Backup Documents 02/26-27/2008 R
Board of County
Commissioners
Regular
Meeting
BACK-UP
DOCUMENTS
February 26-27,2008
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD (CRAB)
AGENDA
February 26-27, 2008
9:00 AM
Tom Henning, BCC Chairman Commissioner, District 3
Donna Fiala, BCC Vice-Chairman Commissioner, District 1; CRAB Chairman
Jim Coletta, BCC Commissioner, District 5; CRAB Vice-Chairman
Frank Halas, BCC Commissioner, District 2
Fred W. Coyle, BCC Commissioner, District 4 (arrived at 10:15 a.m.)
(absent on 2/27/08)
NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM
MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER
WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE
AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. ALL REGISTERED SPEAKERS WILL
RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES UNLESS THE TIME IS ADJUSTED BY
THE CHAIRMAN.
COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003-53, AS AMENDED BY
ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS
SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
(INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE
BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT.
REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON
THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION
TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF
THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS."
Page t
February 26-27, 2008
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD
WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO,
AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD
OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE
TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY
ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING,
YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF
CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LOCATED AT 3301 EAST
TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34112, (239) 252-8380; ASSISTED
LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN
THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE.
LUNCH RECESS SCHEDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1 :00 P.M.
1. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
A. Pastor Chuck Cary, Moorings Presbyterian Church
Pledge of allegiance lead by Chief Don Peterson
2. AGENDA AND MINUTES
A. Approval of to day's regular, consent and summary agenda as amended. (Ex
Parte Disclosure provided by Commission members for consent and
summary agenda.)
Approved and/or Adopted with changes - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle
absent)
B. January 22, 2008 - BCC/LDC Meeting
Approved as Presented - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent)
C. January 25, 2008 - BCC/CRA Advisory Board Workshop
Approved as Presented - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent)
D. January 29, 2008 - BCC/Regular Meeting
Approved as Presented - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent)
Page 2
February 26-27, 2008
3. SERVICE A WARDS: (EMPLOYEE AND ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS)
4. PROCLAMATIONS
A. Proclamation recognizing the continued support for Drug Free Collier and
supporting "The Adolescent Mind and High Risk Behaviors" presentation
scheduled for Wednesday, February 27,2008 by Michael Nerney. To be
accepted by Maria Victoria Delgado of Drug Free Collier.
Adopted - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent)
B. Proclamation to recognize Golden Gate Fire Chief Donald R. Peterson for
27 years of dedicated service to Collier County. To be accepted by Chief
Don Peterson.
Adopted - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent)
C. Proclamation to offer our appreciation and thanks to the volunteer drivers,
office staff, and their families for their efforts in making the quality oflife
better for the veterans in our community. To be accepted by Jim Elson,
President, Collier County Veterans Council and Don Peacock, Treasurer,
Collier County Veterans Council.
Adopted - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent)
5. PRESENTATIONS
A. Construction briefing on six lanes of new roadway including new signals
and street lighting on Collier Boulevard from Golden Gate Boulevard to 7th
Ave North and from Mission Hills to Immokalee Road. Also includes bridge
improvements at Tree Farm Road and new roadway on Tree Farm Road. In
addition building a new multiuse pathway on the east side of the canal
parallel to Collier Boulevard from Vanderbilt Beach Road to Immokalee
Road.
Presented
B. This item to be heard at 1 :00 p.m. Presentation by the Collier County Fire
Chiefs' Association regarding the Consolidation Report.
Motion to have County Manager include all participants including EMS
and other independent parties in the discussions - Approved 5/0;
Motion that the Board ratify that if consolidation occurs EMS will be
included and will not be under control of County Government _
Approved 5/0
Page 3
February 26-27, 2008
C. Recommendation to recognize Mary-Jo Brock, Executive Secretary, County
Manager's Office, as Employee of the Month for January 2008.
Presented
6. PUBLIC PETITIONS
A. Public petition request by Michael and Tammy McEndree to discuss the
Santa Barbara Extension Project and a sound barrier wall on the east side of
Polly Avenue.
Presented
B. Public petition request by Donald Kennedy to discuss clearing of Hurricane
Wilma debris from Rock Creek.
Chairman Henning to write letter to various agencies asking for
assistance - Consensus
C. Public petition request by Gregory Pellechia to discuss Johnnycake Drive
portion of the Willow West Stormwater Improvement Project #510776.
Presented
Item 7 and 8 to be heard no sooner than 1:00 p.m., unless otherwise noted.
7. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
A. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte
disclosure be provided by Commission members. CU-2007-AR-11977
Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, represented by Robert L.
Duane, AICP, of Hole Montes, Inc., requesting a Conditional Use allowed in
the Estates (E) zoning district pursuant to Table 2, Section 2.04.03 of the
Land Development Code (LDC). The 6.5 acre (E) zoned site is proposed for
a Fire Station not to exceed 17,642 square feet. The subject site is located on
6.5 acres in the north east corner of Desoto Boulevard North and the
proposed 22nd Avenue N.E., Golden Gate Estates Unit 72, Section 28,
Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida.
Resolution 2008-50 Adopted 5/0
B. This item has been continued from the February 12,2008 BCC Meetine.
This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte
disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition: V A-2006-AR-
Page 4
February 26-27, 2008
10092 Mohammed M. Rahman, represented by Stephen 1. Fleming, P.E.,
requesting a before-the-fact variance from Section 5.05.05.B. of the LDC to
reduce the lot width along the north and south property line from the
required 150 feet to 135 feet, and to reduce the side yard setback along the
west property line from the required 40 feet to 25 feet to permit an
automobile service station. The subject property is located at 2393 Lake
Trafford Road, Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier
County, Florida.
Resolution 2008-51 withe addition of "no loitering signs"
Adopted 4/1 (Commissioner Coyle opposed)
8. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Request for the Board to consider a proposed amendment to section 1.04.04,
Reduction of Required Site Design Requirements, of the Collier County
Land Development Code as part of the Special Land Development Code
(LDC) amendment cycle for 2008 as previously approved by the Board.
Ordinance 2008-12
B. This item has been continued to the March 11.2008 Meetine. This item
requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be
provided by Commission members. Petition: PUDZ-2006-AR-lOI7l
Eastbourne Bonita, LLC, represented by Laura Spurgeon, of Johnson
Engineering, Inc., and Patrick G. White, Atty. of Porter, Wright, Morris &
Arthur, LLP., requesting a rezone from the Agricultural (A) and Special
Treatment (ST) Overlay Zoning District to the Residential Planned Unit
Development (RPUD) Zoning District for project known as Brandon RPUD,
for the development of204 single-family and multi-family residential units.
The subject property, consisting of 51.1 acres, is located on the southeast
corner of the intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial
Boulevard, Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County,
Florida.
9. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
A. This item to be heard at 10:30 a.m. Presentation to the Board of County
Commissioners by Andrea Sims, Waters-Oldani Executive Recruitment, a
Division of the Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and consideration of the
recommended five finalists for the Collier County Attorney position.
Page 5
February 26-27, 2008
Motion to approve the selection of the 5 final candidates - Approved
5/0; Discussion regarding interviewing procedures and questions;
Interviews will be held on April 9, 2008
B. Appointment of member to the Pelican Bay Services Division Board.
Resolution 2008-47: Appointing Robert A. Pendergrass from the
"Resident" category w/term limits expiring on 3/31/10
Adopted 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent)
C. This item to be heard at 3:00 p.m. To provide information on the status of
the Southwest Florida Expressway Authority (SWFEA) activities and the
ongoing Toll Feasibility Studies for 1-75 and to take action to support or
deny the attached resolution. (Commissioner Coletta)
Motion to direct the County Attorney's Office to prepare a Resolution
to emphasize non-participation in the tolling of Lanes 5 and 6; look at
other options for moving traffic north and south and draft a budget
amendment for a maximum expenditure of $300,000 towards funding
the study - Approved 3/2 (Commissioner Halas and Commissioner
Coyle opposed)
D. Appointment of members to the Radio Road Beautification Advisory
Committee.
Resolution 2008-48: Re-appointing Dale L. Lewis (w/waiver of term
limit) and Betty R. Schudel - Adopted 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent)
E. Appointment of members to the Bayshore Beautification MSTU Advisory
Committee.
Resolution 2008-49: Re-appointing Bill L. Neal w/waiver of term limit
and Maurice Gutierrez( w/waiver of term limit) - Adopted 4/0
(Commissioner Coyle absent)
10. COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Discussion on the history and application of the Land Development Code
regulations concerning the rear yard setback requirements for accessory
structures in the Golden Gate Estates Zoning District. (Susan M. Istenes,
AICP, Director, Zoning & Land Development, CDES)
Motion to approve Option No.3 on lawfully permitted structures;
County Attorney's Office to memorialize actions in a Resolution to be
Page 6
February 26-27, 2008
brought back at the next BCC Meeting - Approved 3/2
(Commissioner Henning and Commissioner Halas opposed)
Continued to March 11, 2008 BCC Meeting
B. Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadway (private) and
drainage improvements for the final plat ofOlde Cypress Unit One (Olde
Cypress PUD). The roadway and drainage improvements will be privately
maintained. (Stan Chrzanowski, Sr. Engineer, Engineering & Environmental
Services Department, CDES)
C. Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners evaluate the
feasibility ofa Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District Transfer of Development
Rights program applicant proposal relative to severance eligibility in relation
to the attainment of the Environmental Restoration & Maintenance and
Conveyance bonus credit to a CDD. (Joe Thompson, Senior Planner,
Comprehensive Planning Department, CDES)
To invite other governmental agencies to the March 25, 2008 BCC
Meeting to discuss options regarding TDR's
D. Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners provide direction
to the County Attorney and the County Manager, or his designee, related to
desired changes to the Charitable Organization Impact Fee Deferral Program
(Amy Patterson, Impact Fee, EDC Manager, CDES)
Motion to accept Alternative Proposal No.2 - Approved 4/1
(Commissioner Coletta opposed)
February 27, 2008
E. Recommendation to adopt FY09 Budget Policy. (John Yonkosky, Director,
Office of Management and Budget)
General Fund Budeet Allocation: - Motion for a mileage rollback minus
2 % reduction in spending (only rollback for MSTU's) - Approved 4/0
(Commissioner Coyle absent);
Milleaee Tareets - Approved 3/1 (Commissioner Henning opposed and
Commissioner Coyle absent);
Staffine: Motion on no new positions and maintain the hiring freeze on
vacancies - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent);
Health Care Proeram: Motion to continue employee health care cost
sharing (80/20) - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) and to
strongly encourage the same with the Constitutional Officers;
Page 7
February 26-27, 2008
Compensation: Motion to approve compensation proposal of only a
COLA (4.2 %) allowance; no merit increases - Approved 4/0
(Commissioner Coyle absent);
Stormwater Capital Fundine - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle
absent);
Resolution 2008-52: Adopting Budget Submittal Date of May 1, 2008 for
the Sheriff's Dept. & the Supervisor of Elections Office - Adopted 4/0
(Commissioner Coyle absent);
Budeet Hearine Schedule - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle
absent);
Comparative Budeet Data - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent)
Contineencies -2.5 % - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent);
Accrued Salary Savines - Cost Center Level - Approved 4/0
(Commissioner Coyle absent);
Revenue Policies - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent);
Three-year Budeet Proiections - Ad Valorem Tax Funds - Approved
4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent)
Time Certain at 5:00 p.m. - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent)
F. This item to be heard at 5:00 p.m. Recommendation to amend the FYOS
Emergency Medical Services Department budget by reducing personnel,
operating and capital expenditures to offset anticipated ambulance fee
revenue shortfalls. (Jeff Page, EMS Chief)
Motion for a Budget Amendment to continue funding (from reserves)
EMS at current staff levels - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle
absent)
Moved from Item #16C3
February 27, 2008
G. Recommendation to adopt a Resolution amending the Collier County
Administrative Code Fee Schedule of development related review and
processing fees as provided for in Code of Laws Section 2-11 to include a
$1,000.00 fee to cover the cost of performing hydraulic modeling and
analysis necessary to ensure concurrency for water and wastewater services.
Resolution 2008-53 - Adopted w/changes 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle
absent)
Moved from Item #16E3
February 27, 2008
Page 8
February 26-27, 2008
H. Recommendation to approve a Resolution authorizing the Chairman of the
Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida, to execute
Agreements, Deeds, and other documents required for the sale of GAC Land
Trust property during the 200S calendar year.
Resolution 2008-54 - Adopted w/stipulations 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle
absent)
February 27, 2008
1]. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON GENERAL TOPICS
A. Ken Thompson - Code violation issues
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
A. This item to be heard at 4:00 p.m. Discussion regarding the Richland PUD
(Pebblebrooke)
Motion to seek legal action to close the bar areas at
Stevie Tomato's - Approved 4/1 (Commissioner Halas opposed)
Moved from Item #16K2
February 27, 2008
B. Recommendation that the Board approve and authorize the Chairman to
execute a continuing retention agreement for services on an "as needed"
basis with the law firm of Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A., to meet County
Purchasing Policy contract requirements.
Approved w/changes - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent)
13. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS
14. AIRPORT AUTHORITY AND/OR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
February 27, 2008
15. STAFF AND COMMISSION GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS
A. County Manager Mudd: Re: power outage February 26, 2008
B. County Manager Mudd: Budget concerns/challenges discussed
C. County Manager Mudd: Feedback on trip to Washington D.C. with
Commissioner Halas - Stressed Collier County's priorities to legislators
D. Jeff Klatzkow: Re: David Weigel's Contract - Motion for Chairman to
offer a written invitation to David Weigel to remain on as County
Page 9
February 26-27, 2008
Attorney until the new candidate is selected - Approved 3/1
(Commissioner Halas opposed and Commissioner Coyle absent)
E. Commissioner Coletta: Illegal immigration services concerns
F. Commissioner Fiala: Note to County Manager to follow-up with
Greyhound Bus owners on the status of cleaning up property
G. Commissioner Halas: Washington trip - positive feedback
H. Chairman Henning: Relay for Life Balloon Sale
I. Chairman Henning: Olde Cypress variance issues; waiting for
interpretation from County Attorney's Office
J. Chairman Henning: Rental registration investigation report inquiry
K. Chairman Henning: Cell phone taxing policy - information to be
brought back to BCC
L. Sue Filson: Re: Animal Services Advisory Committee vacancy
M. Motion to Adjourn - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16. CONSENT AGENDA - All matters listed under this item are considered to be
routine and action will be taken by one motion without separate discussion of
each item. If discussion is desired by a member of the Board, that item(s) will
be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approved and/or Adopted with Changes - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent)
A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
1) Request approval by the Board of County Commissioners for the
proposed schedule for the Land Development Code (LDC)
Amendment Cycle for 200S.
Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 5:05 p.m. in BCC Chambers
2) Recommendation to approve final acceptance of the sewer utility
facility for Botanical Place.
W/release of Utilities Performance Security
3) To accept final and unconditional conveyance of the water utility
facility for Treviso Bay Temporary Sales Facility.
W/release of Utilities Performance Security
Page 10
February 26-27, 2008
4) Recommendation to approve final acceptance of the water and sewer
utility facilities for VeronaWalk, Phase 3A.
W/release of Utilities Performance Security
5) Recommendation to approve final acceptance of the water and sewer
utility facilities for Mediterra, Parcel 106.
W/release of Utilities Performance Security
6) Recommendation to award Bid No. OS-4l97 Nuisance Abatement
Services to Ecosystem Technologies, Inc. and Environmental
Mowing, Inc.
For lawn services and invasive plant removal and maintenance
for code violators
7) Recommendation to approve the Release and Satisfaction of Code
Enforcement Liens for payments received.
As Detailed in the Executive Summary - Recording Cost $650.00;
$10.00 per release of Lien
8) This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by
Commission Members. Should a hearine be held on this item. all
participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to
approve for recording the final plat of Mediterra Parcel 125, Replat of
Lots 44 - 47.
9) This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by
Commission Members. Should a hearine be held on this item. all
participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to
approve for recording the final plat of Alligator Alley Commerce
Center Phase One.
10) Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadway (private) and
drainage improvements for the final plat of Mediterra Parcel 103 with
the roadway and drainage improvements being privately maintained.
Resolution 2008-42 W /release of Maintenance Security
11) Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadway (private) and
drainage improvements for the final plat of Classics Plantation Estates
Phase One, (Lely Resort PUD), the roadway and drainage
Page 11
February 26-27, 2008
improvements will be privately maintained.
Resolution 2008-43 W/release of Maintenance Security
Continued indefinitely
12) Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadway (private) and
drainage improvements for the final plat of Augusta at Pelican Marsh
(Pelican Marsh PUD) with the roadway and drainage improvements
being privately maintained.
B. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
Continued to the March 11, 2008 BCC Meeting
1) Recommendation to award Bid #OS-50l6 On Call Landscape and
Irrigation Service by category to various vendors for an estimated
yearly cost of $500,000 (Fund Ill)
Commercial Land Maintenance, Hannula Landscaping, and Vila
& Son Landscape were awarded for on call landscape and
irrigation services
C. PUBLIC UTILITIES
1) Recommendation to adopt a Resolution to approve the Satisfactions of
Lien for Solid Waste residential accounts wherein the County has
received payment and said Liens are satisfied in full for the 1991,
1995, and 1996 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special
Assessment. Fiscal impact is $6S.50 to record the Satisfactions of
Lien.
Resolution 2008-44
2) Recommendation to approve, execute and record a Satisfaction of a
Notice of Claim of Lien for Sanitary Sewer System Impact Fee. Fiscal
impact is $10.00 to record the Satisfaction of Lien.
For Folio #3] 155007024
Moved to Item #10G
3) Recommendation to adopt a Resolution amending the Collier County
Administrative Code Fee Schedule of development related review and
processing fees as provided for in Code of Laws Section 2-11 to
include a $1,000.00 fee to cover the cost of performing hydraulic
modeling and analysis necessary to ensure concurrency for water and
Page 12
February 26-27, 2008
wastewater services.
4) Approve a budget amendment to recognize funds provided by South
Florida Water Management District Grants in the amount of$450,000
and approve the necessary budget amendment for the Reclaimed
Water Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project #74030
Which is the first phase of this project, four additional wells are
planned to begin in 2011
D. PUBLIC SERVICES
1) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Margarita
Del Socorro Escobar (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County
impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at
Lot 165, Trail Ridge, East Naples.
Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees
2) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Esaie
Foreste and Lyla Foreste (Owners) for deferral of 100% of Collier
County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit
located at Lot 161, Trail Ridge, East Naples.
Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees
3) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Antoinette
Laguerre (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees
for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 163,
Trail Ridge, East Naples.
Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees
4) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Antoine
Joseph and Saintherese Joseph (Owners) for deferral of 100% of
Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing
unit located at Lot 3, Block 14, Naples Manor Addition, East Naples.
Deferring $26,240.68 in Impact Fees
Page 13
February 26-27, 2008
5) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Danielle
Alexandre (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact
fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 162,
Trail Ridge, East Naples.
Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees
6) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Jose J.
Rosas Arroyo and Maria E. Rosas (Owners) for deferral of 100% of
Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing
unit located at Lot 160, Trail Ridge, East Naples.
Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees
7) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Gabince
Fanfan and Monique Willien (Owners) for deferral of 100% of Collier
County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit
located at Lot 49, Trail Ridge, East Naples.
Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees
8) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Zilana
Marc (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for
an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 51, Trail
Ridge, East Naples.
Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees
9) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Lunel
Napoleon (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees
for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 52, Trail
Ridge, East Naples.
Deferring $] 9,372.46 in Impact Fees
10) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Vida
Trainie Baltazard (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County
impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at
Page 14
February 26-27, 2008
Lot 164, Trail Ridge, East Naples.
Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees
11) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Jacqueline
Jules (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for
an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 142,
Independence II-A, Immokalee.
Deferring $19,274.83 in Impact Fees
12) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Jose Angel
Olvera and Nora Beatriz Olvera (Owners) for deferral of 100% of
Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing
unit located at Lot 19, Liberty Landing, Immokalee.
Deferring $] 2,442.52 in Impact Fees
13) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Islaine
Georges (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees
for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 50, Trail
Ridge, East Naples.
Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees
14) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Minouche
Carilus (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees
for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 26,
Liberty Landing, Immokalee.
Deferring $12,442.46 in Impact Fees
15) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Samuel
Trejo and Rebecca Castro (Owners) for deferral of 100% of Collier
County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit
located at Lot 27, Liberty Landing, Immokalee.
Deferring $]2,442.46 in Impact Fees
16) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Emmanuel
Page 15
February 26-27, 2008
Louimare (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees
for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 30,
Liberty Landing, Immokalee.
Deferring $12,442.46 in Impact Fees
17) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Passiana
Belizaire (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees
for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 35,
Liberty Landing, Immokalee.
Deferring $12,442.46 in Impact Fees
18) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Jose
Penaloza Jasso and Aracely Penaloza (Owners) for deferral of 100%
of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable
housing unit located at Lot 31, Liberty Landing, Immokalee.
Deferring $12,442.46 in Impact Fees
19) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Miguel
Angel Gaspar Francisco (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier
County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit
located at Lot 22, Liberty Landing, lmmokalee.
Deferring $12,442.46 in Impact Fees
20) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Jean Vital
Astreide and Marie Astreide (Owners) for deferral of 100% of Collier
County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit
located at Lot 10, Liberty Landing, Immokalee.
Deferring $12,442.52 in Impact Fees
21) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Freeman
and Freeman, Inc. (Developer) for deferral of 100% of Collier County
impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at
Lot 20, Block 29, New Market, Immokalee.
Deferring $19,305.88 in Impact Fees
Page 16
February 26-27, 2008
22) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Freeman
and Freeman, Inc. (Developer) for deferral of 100% of Collier County
impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at
Lot IS, Pine Grove, Immokalee.
Deferring $19,300.01 in Impact Fees
23) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves,
and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Robert
Martinez and Juani Martinez (Owners) for deferral of 100% of Collier
County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit
located at Lot 34, Liberty Landing, Immokalee.
Deferring $12,442.46 in Impact Fees
24) Report to the Board of County Commissioners a summary of the
Impact Fee Deferral Agreements recommended for approval in FYOS,
including the total number of Agreements approved, the total dollar
amount deferred and the balance remaining for additional deferrals in
FYOS.
25) Recommendation to cease implementation of the Collier County
Lethal Yellowing Disease Ordinance 2004-11 suppression program
due to funding constraints and lack of consistent evidence of program
need.
Advertise ordinance to be brought back to repeal Ordinance
2004-11
26) Request to approve the renewal of Contract #03-3445, Vanderbilt
Beach Concession with Day-Star Unlimited, Inc. d/b/a Cabana Dans.
For an additional five years
E. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
1) Recommendation to award bid # OS-5013, Safety Equipment and
Supplies to a primary, secondary and tertiary vendor, based on the
lowest and most qualified bids.
The primairy vendor is Safety Products, Inc., the secondary is
Ritz Safety, LLC and the tertiary is Grainger
Page 17
February 26-27, 2008
2) Recommendation to approve two Second Amendments to Lease
Agreement with A&P Boole, LLC, for the continued use of the
maintenance garage and parking space on Arnold Avenue for the
Sheriff's Office, at a combined annual rental of$92,248.80.
The lease is extended to March 1,2009
Moved to Item #10H
3) Recommendation to approve a Resolution authorizing the Chairman
of the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida, to
execute Agreements, Deeds, and other documents required for the sale
of GAC Land Trust property during the 2008 calendar year.
4) That the Board of County Commissioners award RFP No. 08-5012 for
Cellular Communications Services and Equipment to Sprint Solutions,
Inc. and further authorize the chairman to sign the standard County
Attorney approved contract. ($320,000)
F. COUNTY MANAGER
1) Recommendation to approve a Fifth Amendment To Lease Agreement
with Gulf Shore Associates, Limited Partnership, for the continued
use of office space by the Pelican Bay Services Division at a first
year's annual rent and Common Area Maintenance fees of$33,588.
Located at 80] Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 605; Pelican Bay Services
is requesting an additional three years with a three year extension
option on the lease that is due to expire on February 28, 2008
2) Recommendation to approve the submittal ofa Volunteer Fire
Assistance grant application from the Isles of Capri Fire District to the
Florida Division of Forestry for the purchase of wild land firefighting
equipment and protective clothing.
3) Recommendation to approve the submittal of a Volunteer Fire
Assistance grant application from the Ochopee Fire Rescue District to
the Florida Division of Forestry for the purchase of wild land
firefighting equipment and protective clothing.
As detailed in the Executive Summary (50/50 matching grant)
Page 18
February 26-27, 2008
G. AIRPORT AUTHORITY AND/OR COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
1) Recommendation for the Community Redevelopment Agency to
approve an extension of Site Improvement Grant Agreement OS/2007
between the CRA and Phillip and Debra Pierce due to certain
construction and permitting delays. (3144 Pine Tree Drive.)
Extended to April 30, 2008
2) Recommendation that the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners approve a budget amendment in the amount of
$44,500 to fund mitigation at Rookery Bay to meet South Florida
Water Management District and the Army Corps of Engineers
mitigation requirements for the South Taxiway construction permit at
Everglades Airpark.
The contractor is Environmental Quality, Inc. which is under
contract with Collier County Airport Authority
3) Recommendation that the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners accept additional funds from the Florida Department
of Transportation in the amount of $14,650 and provide a fifty percent
(50%) match in the amount of$14,650 for a total Budget Amendment
of $29,300 for security enhancements for the aviation fuel storage
tank system (fuel farm) at the Marco Island Executive Airport.
4) To approve and execute Sweat Equity Grant Agreement(s) between
the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency and a Grant
Applicant(s) within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community
Redevelopment area. (2500 Lee Street)
5) To approve and execute Site Improvement Grant Agreement(s)
between the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency and
a Grant Applicant(s) within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle
Community Redevelopment area. (3043 Cottage Grove Avenue)
H. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1) Commissioner Henning requests Board approval for reimbursement
for attending a function serving a valid public purpose. Attended the
Economic Development Council's VIP Breakfast Meeting at The
Page 19
February 26-27, 2008
Withdrawn
2)
Hilton Naples on Thursday, February 7, 200S; $20.00 to be paid from
Commissioner Henning's travel budget.
Located at 5111 Tamiami Trail North
Commissioner Henning requests Board approval for reimbursement
for attending a function serving a valid public purpose. Is attending
The Marine Industries Association of Collier County Members
Meeting at the Elks Lodge on Tuesday, February 12th, 200S; $25.00
to be paid from Commissioner Henning's travel budget.
Located at 3950 Radio Road
3)
Commissioner Halas requests Board approval for reimbursement
regarding attendance at a function serving a valid public purpose.
Attending the Economic Development Council of Collier County First
Member Investor Meeting and Mixer for 200S on Thursday, February
2S, 200S, at the Naples Beach Hotel and Golf Club; $40.00 to be paid
from Commissioner Halas' travel budget.
Located at 851 Gulf Shore Boulevard North
4)
Commissioner Fiala requests Board approval for reimbursement for
attending a function serving a valid public purpose. Will be attending
the Celebrate the Naples Launch of DayJet on Wednesday, February
13, 200S, at the Naples Municipal Airport; $7.50 to be paid from
Commissioner Fiala's travel budget.
Located at 580 Terminal Drive
5)
Commissioner Fiala requests Board approval for reimbursement for
attending a function serving a valid public purpose. Will be attending
the 200S Women of Style Honorees on Friday, February 15, 200S, at
the Naples Grande Resort & Club; $125.00 to be paid from
Commissioner Fiala's travel budget.
Located at 475 Seagate Drive
I. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE
1) Miscellaneous items to file for record with action as directed.
J. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS
Page 20
February 26-27, 2008
1) To obtain Board approval for disbursements for the period of
February 2, 200S to February S, 200S and for submission into the
official records of the Board.
2) To obtain Board approval for disbursements for the period of
February 9, 200S to February 15, 200S and for submission into the
official records of the Board.
K. COUNTY ATTORNEY
1) Recommendation to approve a Stipulated Final Judgment for Parcel
Nos. S60 & 960 in the lawsuit styled CC v. J.s. Roath Corp., et aI,
Case No. 05-l093-CA (South County Regional Water Treatment
Wellfield Project #70S92). (Fiscal Impact-- $114,900.00)
Moved to Item #12B
2) Recommendation that the Board approve and authorize the Chairman
to execute a continuing retention agreement for services on an "as
needed" basis with the law firm of Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A., to
meet County Purchasing Policy contract requirements.
3) Recommendation to approve a Stipulated Final Judgment in the
amount of $42,000.00 for Parcels l26FEE and I 26TDRE in the
lawsuit styled Collier County, Florida v. Michael J. Crouch, et al.,
Case No. 07-369l-CA (Oil Well Road Project No. 60044). (Fiscal
Impact $17,762.05)
4) Recommendation to Approve a Mediated Settlement Agreement and a
Stipulated Final Judgment to be drafted incorporating the same terms
and conditions as the Mediated Settlement Agreement in the amount
of $215,000.00 for the acquisition of Parcels l13A, Sl3 and 913 in the
Lawsuit styled Collier County, Florida v. Delbert Ackerman, et al.,
Case No. 06-1 I 24-CA (County Barn Road Project #6010 I). (Fiscal
Impact: $99,919.00)
5) Recommendation that the Board review and approve an Affidavit and
Attorney Certification, as well as a Consent to certain mortgages
made by the Assignee, Light Tower Wireless, LLC, of a certain lease
heretofore entered into by the Board on April 13, 1999 by and
Page 21
February 26-27, 2008
between the County and Acme Towers, Inc.
17. SUMMARY AGENDA - THIS SECTION IS FOR ADVERTISED PUBLIC
HEARINGS AND MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: 1) A
RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FROM STAFF; 2) UNANIMOUS
RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE COLLIER COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION OR OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OF
ALL MEMBERS PRESENT AND VOTING; 3) NO WRITTEN OR ORAL
OBJECTIONS TO THE ITEM RECEIVED BY STAFF, THE COLLIER
COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, OTHER AUTHORIZING
AGENCIES OR THE BOARD, PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF
THE BCC MEETING ON WHICH THE ITEMS ARE SCHEDULED TO BE
HEARD; AND 4) NO INDIVIDUALS ARE REGISTERED TO SPEAK IN
OPPOSITION TO THE ITEM. FOR THOSE ITEMS, WHICH ARE QUASI-
JUDICIAL IN NATURE, ALL PARTICIPANTS MUST BE SWORN IN.
A. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte
disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition: CU-2007-AR-
12384, Enterprise Leasing Company d/b/a Enterprise Rent-a-Car, applicant
and owner, is requesting a Conditional Use pursuant to LDC Section 2.04.03
for a rental car agency within the General Commercial (C-4) Zoning
District. The subject property is located at 13560 Tamiami Trail North, Suite
8, in Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County,
Florida.
Resolution 2008-45
B. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte
disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition: A VESMT-
2006-AR-l0754, to disclaim, renounce and vacate the County's and the
Public's interest in a 25 foot wide drainage easement over the south and east
25 feet of the north of the northeast of the northwest of the southwest of
Section 24, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, and
being more specifically described in Exhibit A and accept the replacement
drainage easement also shown on Exhibit A in place of the vacated
easement.
Resolution 2008-46
18. ADJOURN
Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent)
Page 22
February 26-27, 2008
INQUIRIES CONCERNING CHANGES TO THE BOARD'S AGENDA SHOULD
BE MADE TO THE COUNTY MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 252-8383.
Page 23
February 26-27, 2008
AGENDA CHANGES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
February 26. 2008
Item 10B continued to the March 11. 2008 BCC meetina: Recommendation to grant final approval of the
roadway (private) and drainage improvements for the final plat of Olde Cypress Unit One (Olde Cypress
PUD). The roadway and drainage improvements will be privately maintained. (Staff's request.)
Item 16A1: The date listed in the Executive Summary for the BCC LDC Meeting 1 has been changed from
Thursday, September 18 to Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 5:05 p.m. (Staff's request.)
Item 16A12 continued indefinitelv: Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadway (private) and
drainage improvements for the final plat of Augusta at Pelican Marsh (Pelican Marsh PUD) with the roadway
and drainage improvements being privately maintained. (Petitioner's request.)
Item 16B1 continued to the March 11.2008 BCC meetina: Recommendation to award Bid #08-5016 On Call
Landscape and Irrigation Service by category to various vendors for an estimated yearly cost of $500,000
(Fund 111). (Staff's request.)
Move Item 16C3 to 10G: Recommendation to adopt a Resolution amending the Collier County
Administrative Code Fee Schedule of development related review and processing fees as provided for in
Code of Laws Section 2-11 to include a $1,000.00 fee to cover the cost of performing hydraulic modeling
and analysis necessary to ensure concurrency for water and wastewater services. (Commissioner Fiala's
request.)
Item 16F1: The first sentence in the second paragraph under Considerations should read: "The current
lease term expires on February 28, 2008 . . . " (rather than 2007). (Staff's request.)
Item 16G1: At the time the agenda went to print, the Amendment to extend Grant Agreement for this item
had not been signed. The Agreement has been signed, and replacement pages have been distributed and
provided for the record. (Staff's request.)
Item 16H4 and 16H5: The Recommendation should read: "That the Board of County Commissioners, in
accordance with Resolution No. 99-410, approve payment by the Clerk for Commissioner Fiala (rather than
Commissioner Coletta) to attend function serving a valid public purpose." (Staff's request.)
Item 17B should include the followina: This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte
disclosure be provided by Commission members. (Staff's request.)
Time Certain Items:
Item 5B to be heard at 1 :00 D.m. {rather than 9:30 a.m. as shown on the index.l Presentation by the Collier
County Fire Chiefs Association regarding the Consolidation Report. (Commissioner Henning's request.)
Item 9A to be heard at 10:30 a.m. (rather than 10:00 a.m. as shown on the index). Presentation to the Board
of County Commissioners by Andrea Sims, Waters-Oldani Executive Recruitment, a Division of the Waters
Consulting Group, Inc. and consideration of the recommended five finalists for the Collier County Attorney
position. (Commissioner Henning's request.)
Item 9C to be heard at 3:00 D.m. To provide information on the status of the Southwest Florida
Expressway Authority (SWFEA) activities and the ongoing Toll Feasibility Studies for 1-75 and to take action
to support or deny the attached resolution. (Commissioner Coletta)
Item 12A to be heard at 4:00 D.m. Discussion regarding Richland PUD (Pebblebrooke).
PROCLAMA TION
J 4A
WHEREAS, alcohol and other drug abuse in this nation have reached epidemic
proportions/ and.
WHEREAS, approximately 55 people died in Collier County of accidental drug
overdoses in 2007; an increase of approximately 35% from 2006," and.
WHEREAS, we should keep our youth, our greatest resource, drug and alcohol free
and guide them toward a future of hope and opportunity," and.
WHEREAS, the most effective way to reduce juvenile drug addiction is to reduce
demand." and.
WHEREAS, this effort depends upon the active participation of families, schools,
and community organizations through education and prevention/ and.
WHEREAS, Drug Free Collier, a ctNIlition of ct1lTlmunity leaders and partners,
parents and the community at large, dedicated to heightening
substance abuse awareness and education, urges all the citizens of our
community to participate in alcohol and drug education and all related
prevention activities, thus mtlking a firm statement that we are
strongly ct1lTlmitted to a drug-free lifestyle/ and.
WHEREAS, in recognitkm of and to continue the celebration of February 10-16,
2008 as htlving been designated "National Drug Prevention and
Education Week': Drug Free Collier has invited Michael Nerney,
National Consultant in Substance Abuse Prevention and Education, to
make a presentation entitled "The Adolescent Mind and High Risk
8ehaviorsH on Wednesday, February 27; 2008. This presentation will
be held at the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Administration Center
located at 5775 Osceola Trail in Naples fram 6:30 to 8:00 p.m.
NOW, THEREFORE- be it proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County, Florida, that it urges our community members to make a
visible statement that we are strongly committed to a drug- free
community by both supporting the efforts of Drug Free Collier and.
particularly, by attending this special event.
DONE AND ORDERED THIS 26th Day of February, 2008
80ARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER 'GUN , "LORIDA
ATTEST:
f 48
PROCLAMA TION
WHEREAS, Fire Chief Dona/d R. Peterson has diligently served the residents of the Golden Gote
Fire Contral and Rescue District for 27 years and is the longest serving fire chief in
Collier County history: and,
WHEREAS, under Chief Petersons leadership, the fire district created four new stations and
added numerous firefighters and equipment to better protect a population that has
grown exponential/y since 1 9SO: and,
WHEREAS, the Golden Gate Fire District was the first in the county to support a joint
emergency services facility consisting of fire, emergency medical services and law
enforcement: and,
WHEREAS, the Golden Gate Fire Districts light technical rescue team became the first in Florida
to complete all state-mandated training: tmd,
WHEREAS, Chief Peterson was instrumental in protecting tM Golden Gate Estates from numerous
wildfires, structure fires, hurricanes and other disasters throughout his tenure as
fire chief, serving tU a knowledgeable incident ClHfImandttr, strike team leader and
liaison to state and national agencies: and,
WHEREAS, the fire district htU never had a line-of-duty death: and,
WHEREAS, Chief Peterson has made numerous personal and professional sacrifices to ensure the
safety of the residents of the Golden Gate Fire Contral and Rescue District.
NOW THEREFORE, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, recognize
Chief Donald R. Peterson
for his lifetime career of #rving Col/ier County. We thank you endlessly and wish
you well in your retirement.
DONE AND ORDERED THIS 26th Day of February, 2008.
SOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER Ci UNTY, ORIDA
ATTEST:
TOM HENMNG, CHAr.
PROCLAMA TION
4C
WHEREAS, the Veterans Transportation Program is a cooperative effort
between the Collier County Board of County Commissioners and
the Collier County Veterans Council; and,
WHEREAS, the purpose of the Transportation Program is to provide free
transportation for Collier County veterans to VA healthcare
facilities in Ft Myers, Bay Pines, Tampa, and other facilities in
South Florida; and,
WHEREAS, the drivers in this Program are all volunteers who donate their
time and effort to see that our veterans receive needed
healthcare in a timely manner; and,
WHEREAS, the families of these volunteers also contribute to the success of
this Program by supporting the volunteers and the goals of the
Tronsportatian Program; and,
WHEREAS, in 2007, our volunteer drivers donated 2,044 hours, transported
610 veterans, and logged 57,195 accident-free miles.
NOW THEREFORE, be it proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County, Florida, that we offer our appreciation and our
thanks to the volunteer drivers, office staff. and their families
for their efforts in making the quality of life better for the
veterans in our community.
DONE AND ORDERED THIS 26th Day of February, 2008
IRMAN
DWI~ E. BROCK, CLERK
7A
COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA
REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a:
xxx Normal Legal Advertisement
(Display Adv.,locatioll, etc.)
.-.****************************************************************f~*~~~****
Originating DepU Div: Comm.Dev.Serv./Planning Person: Nancy Gundlach, AICP f \l.(IY~
Other:
~*********
ate: 1'22.05
ontral And Rescue District
Petition No. (If none, give brief description): CU-2007-AR-I J977, Big Corkscrew Island Fir
Petitioner: (Name & Address): Boh Duane, Hole Montes, Inc., 950 Encore Way, Naples. FL 34110
Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Big
Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, 13240 lmmokalee Rd., Naples, FL 34120
Hearing before BeC
BZA
Other
Requested Hearing date:
F ebruarv 26. 2008
Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing.
Newspaper(s) to be used; (Complete only if important):
XXX Naples Daily News
Other
Legally Required
Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: Petition: CU-2007-AR-1l977, Big Corkscrew Island
Fire Control Rescue District, represented by Robert L. Duane. Alep, of Hole Montes, Inc., requesting a Conditional Use
allowed of the Estates (E) zoning disllict pursuant to Section 2.01.03.0.l.e. of the Land Development Code (LDC). The 6.5<0
acre (E) zoned site is proposed for a Safety Service Facility that will be a Fire Station and Administration Building not to
exceed 17,642 square feet. The subject site is located on 6.5 acres in the north east corner of Desoto Boulevard North and
the proposed 22nd Avenue N.E.. Golden Gate Estates Unit 72, Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier
County, Florida.
Companion petition(s), if any & proposed baring date:
Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? Yes
131-138326-649100
No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs:
Revi~ yn ~~ ;htJ ),8
Department Head Date
Approved by:
County Manager
Date
List Attachments:
DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS
A. For hearings before BeC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval
before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal
review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The
Manager's office will distribute copies:
County Manager agenda file: to
Requesting Division
Original Clerk's Office
B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file.
**~*~*****~******************************************************************************************
FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY:
Date Received: ~ Date of Public hearing: Z)2.!, leiS Date Advertised: ~
RESOLUTION NO. 08-_
7A
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A
FIRE STATION AND ADMINISTRATION BUILDING IN
THE ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE
COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,
SECTION 2.01.03.G.l.e., FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON
THE EAST SIDE OF DESOTO BOULEVARD NORTH,
OPPOSITE AND NORTH OF 22 AVENUE NE, IN SECTION
28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH. RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORlDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of
Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to
establis~ coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the
protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code
(Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among
which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after notice as in
said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use
for a rue station and administration building in the Estates (E) Zoning District, pursuant to
Land Development Code Section 2.01.03.G.l.e. on the property hereinafter described, and has
found as a matter of fact (Exhibit lIA") that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been
made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with
Section IO.08.00.D of the Land Development Code, as amended; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this
Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier
County, Florida, that:
Petition CU-2007-AR-II977, mad by Robert L. Duane, AICp of Hole Montes, Inc.,
representing Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, an Independent Special
District and Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, with respect to the property
hereinafter described as:
Page I of2
The South 180 feet of Tract 115, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 72,
according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 8, of the
Public Records of Collier County, Florida, and
7A
1be North 150 feet of Tract 115, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 72,
according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 8, of the
Public Records afeollier County, Florida
is hereby approved for a Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.01.03.G.l.e of the Collier
County Land Development Code in the Estates (E) Zoning District, for a fIre station and
administration building in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan found in Exhibit "B" and
subject to the conditions found in Exhibit "en attached hereto and incorporated by reference
herein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this
Board.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super-majority vote, this _ day of
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORlDA
By:
By:
TOM HENNING, Chainnan
, Deputy Clerk
ow
County Attorney
Exhibits (attached): A. Findings of Fact
B. Conceptual Site Plan, entitled, "Big Corkscrew Island & Rescue
District #14,'. dated 1/07, which is prepared by Hole Montes, Inc.
C. Conditions
Page 2 of2
?A'
FINDINGS OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-11977
The following facts are found:
1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes / No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes /' No
C. Affects neighboring properties in: relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
_ No affect or v'Affect mitigated by M{~/-S J\.kJ\.v,J,lv-c-, J,- <;Qkit'Ct;
_ Affect cannot be mitigated }
D. Compatibility with adj acent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
y es _1<~=No _8,A ~ J O'l^- v", I he 7 ~"'-
Based on the above fmdings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
CHAIRMAN_M~
DATE: !( r \ '\ -0/
EXHIBIT A
?A
FINDING OF FACT
BY .
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-11977
The following facts are found:
1. Section 10.08.00 ofthe Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A.
Consistency ~and Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes No .
B.
Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingr~eSS
Yes_ No_
C.
boring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
No affect or ~ Affect mitigated by
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use wit~trict
YeSLNO_
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
MFMBE~4!?
DATE: /1- If ;-07
EXHIBIT A
7 A '~~
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMIsSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-11977
The following facts are found:
I. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yesl1tt No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes121 No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
1!l No affect or ~ Affect mitigated by
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
Yes~ No_
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, wi tipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE:-A~h
MEMBER:
EXHIBITA
?A
....
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-11977
The following facts are found:
1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes fj--No_
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structur~s thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes~ No_
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
~ffe7:
~ affect or _ Affect mitigated by
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
Yes~ No_
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipula .
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE: ,I 11~!o 7
.0. /:1 . //?-< /0 r'lj
/-oV b-;e.-rT (/ '/
-=---. ~
EXHIBIT A
I 7 A"",.
FINDING OF FACT
. BY .
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMlSSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-11977
The following facts are found:
1.
Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
z.
Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A.
C_ren" 1 <h, Lrnd D~,lopm'm Codo "'" Growili Maru<,,,,,,,,, P1m,
Yes No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
"'" ~ntrnL '1=.s in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingre Ii & egress .
. Yes No_ .
C. Ai ects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
e cts:
No affect or .. Affect mitigated by
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use hithin district
Yes j No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, . th stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE: II Ii 0
EXHIBIT A
?A
FINDING OF FACT
BY .
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-1l977
The following facts are found:
1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes J No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes.~ No_
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
No affect or ~ Affect mitigated by
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
yes-0o_
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE ~,I f 14 J 6l MEM13"" ~ ~
EXHIBIT A
?A
FINDING OF FACT
BY .
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-I1977
The following facts are found:
1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
Z. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affectthe public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes / No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes v' No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects: . .
/ No affect or ~ Affect mitigated by
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
Yes (' No
Based on the above fmdings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE:
/1/15/07
I I
MEMBER: I'IhnA-. '---Re..eA {!d/~
EXHIBIT A
tA
FINDING OF FACT
BY .
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-11977
The following facts are found:
1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code anthorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes V No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes V No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects: .
V No affect or ~ Affect mitigated by
_ Affect carmot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
Yes V No
Based on the above fmdings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
MEMBER: ./~ ~
DATE: 1(~/5=cJ 7
EXHIBIT A
OHw~v..5N1NOZ
3.or,I~.ooM __,
:;Nn~_____'j.~,lt.OON 1'1.
--- _ ~.:!:!l_ _ _ _._._. ..
~
i
,
I!
:1
,
,
il'!!
1 ~5i.
',.
"
,.;., I
"'. ';.." ::.'("r.<.: l.. .':"'3~":~' ',.
~. ",' '::., , '., l.;;_~'''',', : '.~
".-' ....
..{ ....
e....,..... :'.1' ';'.1.'
":
'.'
.: :';'
'"
',"'.!,.,
:;.
.:.
....
.:...
-:
";.' ....' ',," ..... 1,iJ.....
";<;}.; '. '~':
.. '.:::~i';::' ;~,
:. :. -. o.~'!' '.. ':,"'N' :'.
: ,': ,', :]~,~:::::.,;-
.... ......
",'.
.
.
:s
o
!!!
,i
Wi
"
%
Z
o
N
.....j,...
;'.
.
... .,'
::l ":'..," ,Il
....
"
. ~
il~
'.
I,
I
".
"
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
:~
II!
:,
_ __.J.l!_______.
!
.'
,I.
""
'~l
','
~iS~
-.o1.G~OI;tS ...,__uo
~ ... 1AI~1J. ,OO.:!'!L M.OI.f;l.lXIS
.00'0'>\ ~.OUil,OO$ - - ______.___
n 'w'/lt'C ",otrll~. " _________~ _._._._____
:t.________ .___._ ..._9..__
--- --- --~ -------- ------- ---------.., //
--------.-----:::::----.-...--------- '\ ,
--~,:;,-:~t'~~~~~:-a^'8 OJ.OS3a ! !~_m______
\ili ~ ~~ I (MI' 300M .000) -----------------m-------r-'
1 I II ______nn____n;;;..___... '. ~
-----or, ,_"'._.....-'-____n__ , \001"'"31 _ 3 ONINOZ
___~._:J!:!ll2'!?_
A .
I - N
~ ~ . ~ is, ~
II 'I ~ i -
< ~ ~ ! - N
. ~ C .. ~ 01
C ~~ ~. 0- t g: i ~
~ . ~~ ~ it ~ , 8
~ ~w ~ f. ~ ! It) f'l
U .
0 0 LJ [J I i :I,
%
W ":'.
" i'::'.' ..:...._, 1'1
w ..."
.... '.'"
Il!
H; .
~:II :,-,1
"I ~ 1i
H ", ~ i~ ~
n i i I.' ! Ii .
' , ii, li!;.(
~: "I 'Ii' a
~~! i~ 1II,I!lh.!!!!!
O'!~i~! ~ J ~
...._Ii!
,
,
,
,
,
,
i
,
,
,
,
~
~
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
'.
'.
,
,
,
,
I
ii~i!
,
s i
~
c ,
f
0 i
~~
~llt l
<
"-
LU
Z
LU
:;:)
Z~
LU~
~i
"Cl
c
N.
N!
.!i
.
!!!
,i
wi
"
%
I z
, 0
~ Ii N
:1 i
,
,
rtii..CWOt!:lW
-
"'~"1'rl\I:IO'_
'll.... f\j:J<pr
. " .
:. ~ l:i
!5u ; ~
W - ,0<
> ~Si~ ~ l
ffi O~~~Ej~i
'" ~"'!1 t ~
~ a's:..
'0. lit !1.l!: It W
wZ
.,<(
::>~
~w
z!:
0"
>=0:
-w
01-
Z.,
0<(
0;1;
R ~ jl _
i/I Ii'; n ~~~
~, ~~h 1" .~.
-;.: ih.. IO~! rt_<.>-!
/; @.~ '.a. 'a i
~dl hi ~Hi
!II! lh. ~
9 hi ,i~~
;I n~ n<~
III
H
8 .
~ r;
, ,
w ~ ;
o K J:: M ~
:. ~:i :e;
(f). I I
iq~ U
~d n
L.1""nO.H i ~
~~~ ~:i;j:lgo1'" .. 1lI
t , ; . , . . . . I . . . a.
>
0:
~ e UU!H!nB! -! ~
:i (3 d '" If '" . . I . . . .
::) 0( . 1 I I I . .
~ i.1f ~ II
; !..IHiiq!i~
:j Iii Wddhi ~ .
~~~ll
.
!j ~i I
· f ~.
IS 1"'6
~ " i i:
~ ~l ~ ~.
HJ..! ill
ii,l
'I
· !;ii
I ~ ii!~
'I Ilii;
II ,'ii.
JII J'li;l
II ~ , III ~ ~t5
S~;
~~I
c:c
....
iii
:J:
~
!
I:'i!JI
., ,,-I
. .
~ Ii Ii~
I !I,
~ ~
<( *
.Joll
1Il.J\-
;=012
wl=~
~zro
roDe
~()W
a:W::l
Oa:o
O-ro
U.w
(!) a:
iii
'1
I
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
FOR
7A
. "~"f'J
CU-2007-AR-1l977
1. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the Master Site Plan, identified as
"Conditional Use Master Site Plan," prepared by Hole Montes, Inc., dated January, 2007.
The site plan noted is conceptual in nature for conditional use approval. The final design
must be in compliance with all applicable federal, state and county laws and regulations.
The Department of Zoning and Land Development Review Director may approve minor
changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements
authorized by this conditional use, so long as these minor changes remain consistent with all
applicable development standards.
2. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this conditional use approval, or major
changes to the approved plan, shall require the submittal of a new conditional use
application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of
submittal, including Chapter 10.02.03, Site Development Plan (SDP) review and approval,
of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 04-41, as amended.
3. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified
to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded
such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low~pressure sodium lamps are
encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged.
a. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a
"cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only
downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage
recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area.
b. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so that
they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building
entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated.
4. Along Desoto Boulevard and nod Avenue N.E., 30 feet of rights-of-way shall be dedicated
to Collier County at no cost, in exchange for relieving the Big Corkscrew Fire District of
turn lane requirements along Desoto Boulevard and nod A venue N .E.
EXHIBIT C
G; Current{ Gundlach/ Conditional Uses/ Big Corkscrew Fire Admin. Bldg. /Exhibit C Conditions 10-19-07
I
?A
COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA
REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a:
xxx Normal Legal Advertisement Other:
(Display Adv., location, etc.)
...................-..................................*.*.....*...*.*...*...*..**.***.*.****.***~.
Originating Dept/ Div: Comm.Dev.Serv./Planning Person: Nancy Gundlach, AICP ~~: (2,.Il' () I
Petition No. (If none, give brief description): CU~2007~AR-11977. Big Corkscrew Island ),de Control And Rescue District
Petitioner: (Name & Address): Bob Duane, Hole Montes, Inc., 950 Encore Way, Naples. FL 34110
Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Big
Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, 13240 Immokalee Rd., Naples, FL 34120
Hearing before Bee
BZA
Other
Requested Hearing date:
January 15. 2008
Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing.
Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important):
XXX Naples Daily News
Other
Legally Required
Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: Petition: CU-2007~AR-11977. Big Corkscrew Island
Fire Control Rescue District, represented by Robert L. Duane, AlCP, of Hole Montes. Inc., requesting a Conditional Use
allowed of the Estates (E) zoning district pursuant to Section 2.01.03.0.l.e. of the Land Development Code (LDe). The 6.5:!:
acre (E) zoned site is proposed for a Safety Service Facility that will be a Fire Station and Administration Building not to
exceed 17,642 square feet. The subject site is located on 6.5 acres in the north east corner of Desoto Boulevard North and
the proposed 22nd Avenue N.E., Golden Gate Estates Unit 72, Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier
County, Florida.
Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date:
Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? Yes
131-138326-649100
No If Yes, what account should be charged tor advertising costs:
Reviewed by:
~ '-tn. ~ 181/1/07
~parunent Head Date .
Approved by:
County Manager
Date
List Attachments:
DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS
A. For hearings before BeC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval
before submitting to County ~anager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal
review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manlier. The
Manager's office will distribute copies:
County Manager agenda file: to
Requesting Division
Original Clerk's Office
B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy tor tile.
~........**..........*................~~......**....*................................................
FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY:
Date Received: ~ Date of Public hearing: ~ Date Advertised: ~l
RESOLUTION NO. 08._
7A -..
A RESOLUTION 01' THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR TIlE
ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDmONAL USE TO ALLOW A
FIRE STATION AND ADMINISTRATION BUILDING IN
THE ESTATES (E) ZONING D1STRlCT PURSUANT TO THE
COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVEWPMENT CODE,
SECTION 2.01.03.G.l.e., FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON
THE EAST SIDE OF DESOTO BOULEVARD NORTIl,
OPPOSITE AND NORTH OF 22 AVENUE NE, IN SECTION
28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of
Florid.. and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has e<>nferred on Collier County the power to
establish. coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the
protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code
(Ordinance No. 200441, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among
which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after notice as in
said regulations made and provided. and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use
for a fire station and administration bnilding in the Estates (E) Zoning District, pursuant to
Land Development Code Section 2.01.03.G.l.e. on the property hereinafter described, and has
fOWld as a matter of fact (Exhibit "An) that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been
made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with
Section 10.08.00.0 of the Land Development Code, as amended; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this
Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented.
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier
County, Florida, that:
Petition CU-2007-AR-1l977, filed by Robert L. Duane, AICP of Hole Montes, Inc.,
representing Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, an Independent Special
District and Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, with respect to the property
hereinafter described as:
Page lof2
The South 180 feet of Tract liS, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 72,
according to the pl.t thereof recorded in Pl.t Book 5, P.ge 8, of the
Public Records of Collier County, Florida. and
?A
The North ISO feet of Tract liS, Golden G.te Estates, Unit No. 72,
according to the plat thereof recorded in PI.t Book 5, P.ge 8, of the
Public Records of Collier County, Florid.
is hereby approved for. Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.01.03.G.1.e of the Collier
County Land Development Code in the Estates (E) Zoning District, for a fire station and
administration building in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan found in Exhibit "B" and
subject to the cOnditions found in Exhibit tiC' attached hereto and incorporated by reference
herein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOL YED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this
Board.
TItis Resolution adopted after motion, second and super~majority vote, this _ day of
,2007.
ArrEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
, Deputy Clerk
JAMES COLETTA, Chairman
App ovedfS;o form
and cien~:
~fI
Je~ I. Wl_!zkow
Chi A stant County Attorney
Exhibits (attached): A. Findings of Fact
B. Conceptual Site Plan, entitled, "Big Corkscrew Island & Rescue
District #14," dated 1/07, which is prepared by Hole Montes, Inc.
C. Conditions
Page 2 of2
? A -. "
FINDINGS OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-I1977
The following facts are found:
1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
No affect or _ Affect mitigated by
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
Yes No
Based on the above fmdings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE:
CHAIRMAN:
EXHIBIT A
7A
...
'l ~..
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-11977
The following facts are found:
1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control. and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects :
No affect or _ Affect mitigated by
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
Yes No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE:
MEMBER:
EXHIBIT A
I
I.
III
JJ 15
m
CIl;j!O
e1M~
mo"
g~cn
~-Ig
JJJJm
CiO::f:
-Ire;;
otoll'r
t .~
i ! I
. D
. '
i =
.
.I
,
.,
m
><
:J:
l:JI
::;
l:JI
lei
!~
I.
,,~!i~
h!l.r
ill(!
~1l'.1
!II!
11:\
ii!
lip
Ii
i'
,I
~
lA'
. · ': ZONING E - IE.t.t..) . pi
. I , _-"'_'..0) hI_.....
~ ~ i -i: ~ .----------t-l----------------------------~;~:-~,~~-;;;)---------~-'1T-;--- 1- \------
;1 i! I / \, DESOTO BLVD.I fir:! il!\
-", I 0 / '. u..~ "5_""_
Iii! III ... " ~~,.. ....
I iB ft =~......~___._._=:=~=~=~=~=~_=_~=_~==~_=~~=:=~=:~:=:~~=~_=~=:
l(\t~~
~ , liillIHUI!i
;1~~)iiIWI
H
-------1-1- I
':
,
r :
.. ,
z '
c :
c: '$:
Ol
'"
Ol
, . . , . I . . . . . I . > c:
immmm~~
..
::0
i' ;ii~iiiiiiiii ~ <
A
3:"
"0
Olz
-<0
"'-
::0-<
.,0
-z
...."
m,...
"c
,...",
~m
iiP i~ lill! I
~,>Il'il"
i'~! I !ll
~ Pi: 'i i i
· l! i Ii
i' ~I
,i loa
r ~ I: II
, .
; i,
i i
,
.
;
.
po
. e ~
D 8 z
.' Ol
B~
"
. '"
.
.
a
; p~i:; ~
US~~!~ ~
11' R m
n i;
. . .
~
II'
;-! ..oc.,..........
_M;_."....
WI lU~
If i'l:1 ~
I h II!, i,. ~
,!'i -eo iS2 -
~!~a 1111 i!;"
~tJo.. 1Il;! i.ltX
li1i;
_.~
· liHL
i a; ii ~
: I
.
~
P ! ~~
. EZ
.. a ~~
u .
.. . J
.. ! ~
B .
III
hi I I [uDD r
II> " .' . . '"
I' i ,",.;, : ' ~. "
;;.':;. .':>; '"
z
~! s I" ~~ . ~J 1 0
.
" ' ~ I ~ ~ .~ ~
~ " ~ ~~
: ! : ,I .
~ I ~ .
>
~ " ~
~ I ~ I if l
~ ! I ;< 0 ~
__Jlr______ _
--------------~-----~---
SOO"II"IO....
."..
,....
__'1~
i'"
III
"i
'I'
"
N
o
z
z
1~ liil!
l' ,
m 1
.. '
.. ~
-N I
!.~ :
~ i
a.:
,
~~ !
~~ I
C!
m:
Z
m
w~
,
,
'.
;11>.....: I
, i
1 !
: !
1 !
: !
~i
~i
r!
1\
;00\ : I
ii 'I
l f
: !
~ 1
1 !
,
.. .
.. ,~, e
:. . I.
II
.
il
i ,',"
:. ~~:-.
. '
':. .:
. ,,:.
~II
I
N
o
Z
Z
"
I'"
l'
m
..
s-
o
!.
c.
.;.,.
",; ...... .;"
'.
, ..
":,",:,.
..... '.'
.; ki,,;..:.:iil\::~.::
15.... ..: u.
:~(.> '<;r(>."
"'0'
'. - 'j' ~ ,"
. ,.' .'>-" -..- .....', :."
.-:: ~ ':/."',:,"'."':. ~.~.! ..~, ::>:..; ......', >."<. :.;"
'r,~'. ':,;l . ';.; '" ..'
:,;'..;. . :', ~il',':: '~',
.' ..11'..." . "j. . Iii .
'..~!i.;'.:" :" ",' .. . j!
'.,.
11'1:
.$!il :
- ,
,
,
It
I'
,
,
,
,
~
~
~l'Sl"i- UII.lIl'
~~ ii!.gg.lI'l J.llI.Ot'iii)
ZONING A-MHO
---
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
FOR
CU-2007-AR-11977
?A
1. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the Master Site Plan, identified as
"Conditional Use Master Site Plan," prepared by Hole Montes, Inc., dated January, 2007.
The site plan noted is conceptual in nature for conditional use approval. The final design
must be in compliance with all applicable federal, state and county laws and regulations.
The Department of Zoning and Land Development Review Director may approve minor
changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements
authorized by this conditional use, so long as these minor changes remain consistent with all
applicable development standards.
2. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified to protect
neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall he shielded such that direct rays
do not pass property lines. Low-pressure sodium lamps are encouraged while halogen type
lights are discouraged.
a. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a
"cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only
downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage
recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area.
b. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so
that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building
entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated.
EXHIBIT C
G: Current! Gundlach/ Conditional Uses/ Big Corkscrew Fire Admin. Bldg. /Exhibit C Conditions 10-30-07
?A
December IS, 2007
Attn: Legals
Naples Daily News
1075 Central Avenue
Naples, Florida 34102
Re: CU-2007-AR-1l977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue
District
Dear Legals:
Please advertise the above referenced notice on Sunday, December 30, 2007 and
kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges
involved, to this office.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Martha Vergara,
Deputy Clerk
P.O.lAccount # 131-138326-649100
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
?A
Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, January 15,
2008 in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier
County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples,
Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The title of the
proposed resolution is as follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A FIRE STATION AND ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING IN THE ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE
COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, SECTION 2.01.03.G.l.e.,
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DESOTO BOULEVARD
NORTH, OPPOSITE AND NORTH OF 22 AVENUE NE, IN SECTION 28,
TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Petition CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control
Rescue District, represented by Robert L. Duane, AICP, of Hole
Montes, Inc., is requesting a Conditional Use allowed of the
Estates (E) zoning district pursuant to Section 2.01.03.8.1.e. of
the Land Development Code (LDC). The 6.5 +/- acre (E) zoned site
is proposed for a Safety Service Facility that will be a Fire
Station and Administration Building not to exceed 17,642 square
feet. The subject site is located on 6.5 acres in the north east
corner of Desoto Boulevard North and the proposed 22nd Avenue N.E.,
Golden Gate Estates, Unit 72, Section 28, Township 48 South, Range
28 East, Collier County, Florida.
NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must
register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of
the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be
limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual
to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If
recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or
organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item.
Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in
the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3
weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case,
written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be
submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days
prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations
before the Board will become a permanent part of the record.
Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need
a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may
need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is based.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
7 A "~
JAMES COLETTA, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
~mmty of Collier
'"
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY C:OURTfJOUSE
330 I T AMIAMI 1(RAIL EA.ST
P,O. BOX 413044
NAPLES. FLoRlDA~1101-3044
.
7A ~
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
December IS, 2007
Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District
13240 Immokalee Rd.
Naples, FL 34120
Re: Petition CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control
and Rescue District
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, January 15,2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, December 30,
2007.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~v~
Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
W chsite- www.c1erk.collier.f1.us
--'-----.....,----..-.~--,-..~-~.-,,---"-.-.--.---,-.- "" _""H"_'___'_,_"~,_~,,,__,_ ",,_ ...__u__.________.______.___
Fax-(239) 775-2755
Email-colIierclerk\a)c1erk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
'eounty of Collier
1.-
CLERK OF THE CIRCUJT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY <tOURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI ~MIL EA.ST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA 't~101-30~4
-*
? A'
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
December IS, 2007
Bob Duane
Hole Montes, Inc.
950 Encore Way
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control
and Rescue District
Dear Petitioner;
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, January 15,2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, December 30,
2007.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
/~
Martha Vergara,
Enclosure
---,_._.,.,--_.,-_._-,,-,~----.,,---~_._-,---.._,-_._--".-.--
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.coIlier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-coIlierclerk~c1erk.coIlier.f1.us
Martha S. Vergara
?A
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
postmaster@collierclerk.com
Wednesday, December 19, 2007 10:35 AM
Martha S. Vergara
Delivery Status Notification (Relay)
Attachments:
ATT341031.txt; CU-2007-AR-11977 Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue Dist.
[J
B
ATT341031.txt
(231 B)
CU-2007-AR-11977
Big Corkscrew...
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested
delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination.
legals@naplesnews.com
1
Page 1 of 1
7A.."
Martha S. Vergara
----_._---^-_._----~~._---_...._-----_..._-_._----_.
From: Perrell, Pam [PPerrell@Naplesnews.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 8:40 PM
To: Martha S. Vergara
Subject: RE: CU-2007-AR-119n Bi9 Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue Dis!.
OK
-_._._---_.~_._-.,_._----~~~._---_._-_._._-_.- .'...... --.-.-.,*,--"-..,..---.-.-....." - '..---..-..--+.,. - ....-.--.--....+...-...-..-.-.....-...----..+-..----.-~----_.__..+_...
From: Martha 5. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com]
Posted At: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 10:35 AM
Posted To: Legals - NON
Conversation: CU-2007-AR-11977 Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue Dlst.
Subject: CU-2007-AR-11977 Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue Dlst.
Pam,
An ad for you..
Thanks,
Martha Vergara
Deputy Clerk II - BMR
252-7240
12/21/2007
Page 1 of 1
7A
Martha S. Vergara
_.....~-_._--~-_...._---~---_.,--_.,---------,.._~---,'--'-~'-~"--"'----'---'----------~--_._.
From: GundlachNancy [NancyGundlach@colliergov.netl
Sent: Thursday. January 10, 2008 4:53 PM
To: Martha S. Vergara
Subject: RE: CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire & Rescue District
Hi Martha,
This item wili not be heard at the January 15, 2008 BCC meeting. It has been scheduled for the February
26, 2008 BCC hearing.
Regards,
Nancy
From: Martha S. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk,com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 20084:44 PM
To: GundlachNancy
Subject: CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire & Rescue District
Hi Nancy,
Quick question, will you be adding this Item to the BCC Jan. 15th Meeting on the change sheet or has this item
been cancelled?
Was reviewing the items advertised and this one isn't on the Agenda.
Thanks,
Martha Vergara
Deputy Clerk II - BMR
252-7240
1/11/2008
Th,
-.APLES OAIL Y '\[WS
Published Dail~
""pies" FL1~ 1112
Affidavit of Publication
State of rlorida
County of Collier
Before the ltndersigned thc~ sene ;IS lhe ;]uthority. personal1}
appeared B. Lllllh. \\110 on oath S<l\S th;lt lhc~
SCIYC ;lS the i\s,;j"'l:111t Corporate SccrClar,\ of the :-\aplcs Dail).
<l daily IlC\\Sp;lpCr published at Naples. in Collier COUllty.
I:Jof!cl<!: distrihuted ill C'olljer ,lIld lxl' COUlllics or Florida: that
the attached COpy of the adYcrtlsmg. being a
PIJElLlC NOTICE
Illlhe mailer or 1'1 KUC NOTICE
\\JS published in said newspaper I time iIllhc isslle
all December ~OI;I. 2007
\ili<lTl[ hll1hc.:r says 111:11111.: said '\3.pk~ ])ail~ \~'\\" i~;1 JW\lSrap.:r
pubiishcd at '\ark~. in said (nl1i<.:rCDlUlty. l'lorida. and 111<1! the said
nc.:\\~J);qkT jus hc.:rdnj'or<: hc..::n clllltillllllUS]V publislh:d in said (\ll]i~]
("'I!il:\ 11,)ri(b~ di~trihukd in (\,]li~r :md J ,~L ,"l\ln[i>2~ or I']ol',da
L'ilL'h d;I\' :lnd ha:< lw..:n ..:nkr..:d as s>2c,md dass lllail11latkr at the rost
"niL'.' H1 'apks_ 111 said Colli..:r Countv. nonda. (or ;1 pc'riod 01 1
\"::lr nL'_\l pr~~'>2ding 111<.' lirs! rllhli~'ali,'ll ofthc attad1<.'d ;':()P~' of
;ll!\'L,rtis":Il1,'nl: al1d :lnial11 fl111hLT -',1\, 111al lh' Ius lll:illll:r paid llor
pl'>llli~",j ,!Il\ p..:J~"<I_ til'lll ell L\Jlvulallull all;' dh<:"UI1i. l..:h<ll~
;__{)l\1ll1i~,~i('n \'r rcllllld j"l" thl: rurrHl~C Dr ~i.'curing ,hi~ ;ic!\;.'rli,..-mcnl f,lr
II'iLii~;;i"'1 ill Ilk' '~Ild Ill:',\"'pajk'l
/-...--
Signatllfc of affiant)
S"Or!l 1(; and suh<.;nibcd be Core [1\('
This lO'hDa\ of December 20117
hUrL.... (1\[;..."..0<')
( Sig~~-;~F~)l;}r~r;\blic)
FE! )()-257X,127
f~?~~~.~:!t~:l
~~. :;f
"l~.. 0':,,-
",.9f",""
JUDY JANES
Commission DD 675029
Expires May 16, 2011
BonOOdThrurroyFew,i~su'al'~8I)O_:'lJl5'7'OIg
.:18:
Notice Is herebygfven
that the Board of County
Commlsslone.rs of Col-
lier Cownty will hold a
public. heai. Jna on Tues-
.a.. January 15. '008 In
the Boardroom. 3rd
Floor, Adminllt"tlo,n
aLllldlng, COm.r, COlInty
, Go:v\,'p"ment Center.
- ....1 T&mlaml Tratl
"-.:p'8S, Florld.~ The'
meet;IIID, will beolt, at
9:00 ...... The lllle '" the
pr~.osed resolution Is
!liM_
A RE$OI,.UT'ON OF THE
8OARO OF ZONING Ap.
PEALS OF COLLIER
CO'OlIJ!!lJY JI.ORIOA"_PRO.
V 1'WI'1"vR THE ~TAB-
".SI!ME ,.ii Of A"._C.ONDI'
TtOljj\l. -TO:l.\;LOllf
_ A Jl1lU1t8:
IJIQ III TIiIi ESTATES (E)
ik'NGDISTRICT_,
ANT TO TIiIi lERf
. TC~&IJJ; j
''OI....'U.... ~APAOP. ,
Ell'lY LOCATED ON THI
lAST SIDI Of DElOIO
BOUI,fVAR;'NOOTHi up.
POS'TE A NOllTH OF
22 AVINU ~.~~..!IC.
liON 28,TUWIQlftP.
SOUTH. RANGI! 21 lAST,
COLL'ERCQUNTY.
FLORIDA \~\<
petlth~JJ,' cu.tOoi~'4.'
IIW1. IIIll eo_ ..
'and flr.C~':.lJA
Olstrl<l.ra ,.~
R_L._ ,.
Hole Montefi:.ml:.: -ft-
qua"lno a, bMdI.' Ii,: ooa'
use a11owecCif"tKe ES-
tates'(E) zonN~ct
Dur.lI.nt to ....c~
2.0L03.G.l.e. of
ll~' atsm!, .t,::~..ct..
(LI). !fM.~
(t2~' .', ..,.,,<,,"'
r~;d t .~~II~~
Fire r.a~n ~ Admin.
Istratlon Bulldlno not to
exceed 17.642SQua',e
feet. The SU~ !llte .
located on 6.5 acres In
the north east comer of
Desoto Boulevard North
and the ..._~
Avenue N.l., Golden
Gate Estett:., untt n.
:!i;l!:'
NOTE:AU.~ wlsh- I
Ing to'Prik on any
::'"':Itt.~,,~.~ ~
mlnIW4I<)r ,~,"lO ....
sentatJOn- .,w_ ~
_lOlIe_sod.
1~dt:J~.~.~1
i'A
be limited t-osm~
on___ lllase_,
"lion Of... '_Iduel to,
~beh8lf of an
n or' QI'OUP 1.
~~.""'" recoo"
nlZed ~y Iha Chelr. a
5'POk_B" ",';p.r'ton'or a
Qrou,.'''''~or I.at'..
may,.'.aj. . 10 ml~
utes to ,spe on an
_.
per.~;:lshlng to
=, ;rartl'n~"~
the 8cMIrd~~~
ets 'mutt s..t!nll~ Mid
-"" . mtn_ 0/3
_k.l>rtQr ...."'* re.
-~~
l'l.!!lt"'l! ..
,~"..,.'.'"
shalt bllU . I to
tho _rooriate COunty
staff . minimum of sev. '
en d.~rlor18 Ih.
f.~.....IJ:l':~=
11.",lIefora thoBoerd
will bacomo a psnn..
nent part oflhO_.
An..,.,..n who d~d.
os to ......, a _....
"'the_WIII.....a
recprd of th~, _,'", .,
=.r=~hOr~\
to.nsUl'8.'~
Ilm:r,_' rts,d~.....th.~...",
..-1riUtJ.! ....
t1ln'ori ':/ -r:.(i'~e
lnn. cthe_1
OA P OFeii9UNT~
~COUHT~.'\
\~COLETTA, CHAIR'
M HT E e'RO~K,
oVJ\G-'
i~~RKMartha vergara.
\'i'S~('~l.'&lI56
b~
7A
.',",
,
January 29, 200S
Attn: Legals
Naples Daily News
1075 Central Avenue
Naples, Florida 34102
Re: CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue
District
Dear Legals:
Please advertise the above referenced notice on Sunday, February 10,2008 and
kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges
involved, to this office.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Teresa Polaski,
Deputy Clerk
P.O.lAccount # 131-138326-649100
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
7A
I'
Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 26,
2008 in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier
County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples,
Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The title of the
proposed resolution is as follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A FIRE STATION AND ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING IN THE ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE
COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, SECTION 2.01.03.G.l.e.,
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DESOTO BOULEVARD
NORTH, OPPOSITE AND NORTH OF 22 AVENUE NE, IN SECTION 28,
TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Petition CU-2007-AR-ll977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control
Rescue District, represented by Robert L. Duane, AICP, of Hole
Montes, Inc., is requesting a Conditional Use allowed of the
Estates (E) zoning district pursuant to Section 2.0l.03.G.l.e. of
the Land Development Code (LDC). The 6.5 +/- acre (E) zoned site
is proposed for a Safety Service Facility that will be a Fire
Station and Administration Building not to exceed 17,642 square
feet. The subject site is located on 6.5 acres in the north east
corner of Desoto Boulevard North and the proposed 22nd Avenue N.E.,
Golden Gate Estates, Unit 72, Section 28, Township 48 South, Range
28 East, Collier County, Florida.
NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must
register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of
the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be
limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual
to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If
recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or
organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item.
Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in
the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3
weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case,
written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be
submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days
prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations
before the Board will become a permanent part of the record.
Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need
a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may
need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is based.
7A
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation
in order to participate in this proceeding; you are entitled, at
no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please
contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department,
located at 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Building W, Naples, Florida
34112, (239) 252-8380. Assisted listening devices for the hearing
impaired are available in the County Commissioners' Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
:-eOl1pty l;>f Collier
CLERK OF THE C[RCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY ~OURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI 1(MIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES. FLORIDA~4JOI-30~4
*
7A
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
January 29, 200S
Bob Duane
Hole Montes, Inc.
950 Encore Way
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control
and Rescue District
Dear Petitioner;
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
0- f). ~U({ PoCtZ~'1 k
\ '~a Polaski,
Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.clerk.collier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk@J.clerk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e-ouety of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY <tOURT~lOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI 'J\R.AIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES. FLORIDA 'l;IlO 1-3044
*
7A
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
January 29, 200S
Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District
13240 Immokalee Rd.
Naples, FL 34120
Re: Petition CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control
and Rescue District
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
\bL@~ k
eresa Polaski,
Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Wcbsite- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk\alclerk.collier.fl.us
7A
Teresa L. Polaski
To:
Subject:
legals@naplesnews.com
CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District
Attachments:
CU-2007-AR-11977.doc; CU-2007-AR-11977.doc
Legals,
Please advertise the following on Sunday, February 10, 2008. Thank you
~ ~
CU-2007-AR-11977 CU-2007-AR-11977
.doc (29 KB) .doc (29 KB)
Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III
Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners
Minutes and Records Department
239-252-8411
(T eresa.Po las ki@collierclerk.com)
1
Teresa L. Polaski
7A
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
postmaster@collierclerk.com
Wednesday, January 30,20089:42 AM
Teresa L. Polaski
Delivery Status Notification (Relay)
Attachments:
ATT476181.txt; CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District
I~...........'l
L:J
I"~..'-:~..,"I
U
ATT476181.txt CU-2007-AR-11977
(231 B) , Big Corkscre...
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested
delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination.
legals@naplesnews.com
1
CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District
Page 1 of 1
Teresa L. Polaski
7A
From: Perrell, Pam [PPerrell@Naplesnews.com]
Sent: Wednesday. January 30, 2008 12:01 PM
To: Teresa L. Polaski
Subject: RE: CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District
OK
From: Teresa L. Polaski [mailto:Teresa.Polaski@collierclerk.coml
Posted At: Wednesday, January 30,20089:41 AM
Posted To: Legals - NDN
Conversation: CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District
Subject: CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District
Legals,
Please advertise the following on Sunday, February 10, 2008. Thank you
<<CU-2007-AR-11977.doc>> <<CU-2007-AR-11977.doc>>
Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III
Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners
Minutes and Records Department
239-252-8411
(T eresa.Polaski@collierclerk.com)
1/30/2008
7A
Teresa L. Polaski
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Teresa L. Polaski
Wednesday, February 13, 2008 4:01 PM
'Iegals@naplesnews.com.
Ads to run on Friday
Attachments:
PUDZ--2006-AR-10171.doc; GU-2007-AR-11977.doc
~
iWlIl
tJ
PUDZ--2006-AR-l0 CU-2007-AR-11977
171.doc (36 KB... .doc (36 KB)
Per your request, here are the notices to rerun on Friday, February 15, 2008. Please provide our office notification letter
that these ads ran with the incorrect headings on Sunday February 10, 2008. And per our conversation you will be crediting
us for the incorrect ads that ran. Thank you
Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III
Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners
Minutes and Records Department
239-252-8411
(T eresa.Po laski@collierelerk.eom)
1
Ads to run on Friday
Page 1 r f 1
7A
Teresa L. Polaski
~~-----~-_._--~-~'---'-"-~"'-- "-~-,.,'-----
From:
Sent:
To:
Perrell, Pam [PPerrell@Naplesnews.com]
Wednesday, February 13, 2008 4:14 PM
Teresa L. Polaski
Subject: RE: PUDZ-2006-AR010171 & CU-2007 -AR-11977
The above referenced notices ran wrong on Sun. Feb. 10, 2008. The headings were interchanged as well as the
ad numbers at the bottom, and the PO #'s would have been switched as well. We regret the error and any
inconvenience we caused you. They will run correctly on Fri., Feb. 13,2008. I have credited the two (2) notices
that ran incorrectly.
Thank you for your understanding in this matter.
Respectfully,
Pam Perrell
Legal Advertising
Naples Daily News
(239) 263-4832
---~---~,--,.._~,-_._._~.~~-
From: Teresa L. Polaski [mailto:Teresa.Polaski@collierclerk.com]
Posted At: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 4:01 PM
Posted To: Legals - NDN
Conversation: Ads to run on Friday
Subject: Ads to run on Friday
<<PUDZ--2006-AR-10171.doc>> <<CU-2007 -AR-11977.doc>>
Per your request, here are the notices to rerun on Friday, February 15, 2008. Please provide our office notification
letter that these ads ran with the incorrect headings on Sunday February 10, 2008. And per our conversation you
will be crediting us for the incorrect ads that ran. Thank you
Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III
Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners
Minutes and Records Department
239-252-8411
(T eresa.Po laski@collierclerk.com)
2/13/2008
Th.Th,
NAPLES DAILY NEWS
Published Daill
Naples. FL 141112
Affidavit of Publication
State of Florida
County of Collier
Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally
appeared B. L~lInb. who on oath says that they .
serve as the ASSistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daill.
a dailv nev\spaper published at Naples. in Collier Counl\.
Florid:" distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida: that
the attached copy of the ad\'crtising. being a
PUBLIC NOTI<::.E
in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE
was published in said newspaper I time in the issue
On Februarv I :;'C,.21111!!
\flianl hl11hcr sa\'.'; that th" said i\aples Dail... !\.::ws i~ a n.::wspapcr
Puhlislh:d al ~ari"s. in .:ollier county. Floridll and that the said
l1<..'v,spaper has herdnfore been continuously published m .';,l1d Collier
County. F1()rida~ distrihuted in Colli.:r and Lee counties of Florida.
.::aeh (lay and has hecn entered as sc..:ond class mail matter al the post
orli..:.:: in :\arks, in said Collier Cnunt~,. Florida. for a p.:riod of 1
\'Car n<:xl precnling lh.: first puhlication of the attached copy of
~d\'ertiserncnL and aOiant further says that he has neither paid nor
promised ilny person. linn or l.:orporatioll any disl.:oum. rebate,
commission or rdillld for the purpose of securing tillS advertIsement for
~Ubl'''I'<'''~t~:j~'W~
( Signature of affiant)
Sworn to and subscribed before me
This I:;'" 200g
[)ay()fFcbruarv 200H
~a
< . 0.;~
(Signa Ire of al] pu he)
FEI :;~.2:;7g127
."";';'.". JUDY JANES ,
.,"".,.v.". . . 0067'-029
f'f:':!:' _ '.:r~ CommIssion v
~.~ ;:, E,pires May 16, 2011
-;.-0-: .... o~$-~ Bonood Thru 11'\1'1 f~lp In&Ufa,,~e 8OC.38,.70'~
Notice. Is hereby given
that the Board of COunty
Commlsslont,rs of Cor.
lIer County will hold a
~ubllc hearing on Tues-
day, FebruarY 26, .,In
the BoardrOOim, - 3rlf
floor, Ad,mlnJ.t,.U.Q:n
Ilulldtng, CoIIfef Courlty
Government Center,
. 3301 East T"""""".11'olI,
fIIaplu,'1qrlifa-. 1'he
meeting will beam at
9:00 A.M. The ttdeot' the
prqposed resolution Is
as fOllows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE
BOARD- OF lONING.Ap.
P.'EALS OF' COLLIER
COUNTY FLORIDA. PRO.
VIDiNG '0. THE ESTAB-
...........T.
TlONAL US ;1.0
A Fila: STA" ,"~I
MINISTRATI- . LD~G
IN THE ESUnS!E)
ZONING DISTRICT PUR-
SUANT TO THE COLUER
COUNTYLAHO DEVEL.
OPMENT CODl. SEC'nON
2.01.03.0.1...." PRO.Po P-
ERTY lOCA 1iI,THE
EAST SiOE TO
BOULEVA~ ; Olio
POSltE Ii... OF
'22 AVENU EC-
TION 28, 1. 41
SOUT'H, RA
COllieR
FLORIDA.
Petition CO~2007-AR-
,U977, Big CQrktctew'IS.
land Fife ==.
OlsI'Iol b~
.ob.rtL~.,\lCI>,.!
Hole Montes-' i.~"J1J're-
qu."lng a. M. o..i
Use allowed'. 'lfii'ib.
tates (E) zontng .dtatrict
pursuant t,o"Se-Cfto-ri
~.Ol;03.CU.e.o', the .t..and
Developm.nt-Cotfti
(LOC). The .,....
{E) zoned ,'" .ts~ro. .
posed for a '. .
ice Fadlfb' , - a:
FI'. Sla"on and Admin.
Istratlon Building not to
exceed 17,642 square
feet. The -SUbJ&ct site 15
located on 6.5 acres In
the' north eat. comer of
Desoto Boulevar4 NOrth
and the proposed' 22nd
Avenue H.E.. Golden
.. ...ie 1....'4t.rIP.
.u c..._, < . '
OlllirGOUfJtY:, I
7A
N01'E:lllI___
.lng to .....k..onanr
~. :,e*,,1:~""
~ =:"orti: =a
: Item to bAt .re.stlct;
.'ndlvldult.. ".~ers wltl
,beUmlttct,to5:'mtmqs.
L~n~~!\~~
.sPMk . on 'behalf 0; .~
=::~~orln::o:
nlz~"DY th. CIWr:. a
"UlO"'''I~~~'for 'I
,S":=r~
Item,
~~.~~!#\l"g,g
~:t~ii.ili4;.~ \. .te_pack~
fl'm .,r t said
'1nI.terI ''8: of:3
=:~t:~~
MSb1~!If~
shall b.~tted to
the appropriate County
staff a ml,r1Jmum of $ev.
~.~~t,,-1o-.-.tha
f:J\< uH'4'lh"'p~~:
tlons before the Board
will become a ptrma.
nent Part of the record.
Any perso.IL ~() deeJd. I
:f ~:~!f::.r=o~,
recofd7tlt.~.
~'~-=~lhereIO
10 ens-M'hal . t=
tlmreet>r'dof_1 pro-
ceadlng. . . WhICh'
NCord,lnc . ,t t....;j
lImonyond "" ~'n"'!
~on . WItIch the'ilp*t
Is based.
tfyou are a person with
a (Usability whO needs
any actO"""". In
!~fd!~lri. f~ .000~.tn
you,. ~:~tt'
~~.;.,~..~:
~:~li~~{~3~{li
~~a'.~'~~'I~ ..k..U:
devl_,'fGl'\., : ng
Impil'lNd. . a. ble
~~,~~-
~8~:Slg~~Rio,.,nY
COlliER COUNTY,
~~~~~G::~~'t:
Cl.lRK ..
r cT:r" Pm_ DeP.
-= NO.l670116
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO ? A
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
exce tion of the Chairman's si ature, draw a line thrau h routin lines #1 throu #4, com lete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson line #S .
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
List in routin order
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact stafffor additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the BCe Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the BCC office only after the BCC has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff
Contact
Agenda Date Item was
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
I.J
2.
c
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records
Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
Phone Number
Agenda Item Number
Number of Original
Documents Attached
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/ A'. in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a TO riate.
I. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters. must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.)
2. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
3. The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval ofthe
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a Iicable.
4. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si alure and initials are re uired.
5. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCe's actions are nullified. Be w eo our deadlines!
6. The document was approved by the BCC on enter date) and all changes
made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The
Coun Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Ucable.
~~o~
I: Forms! County Forms! BCe Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revis d 1.2605, R vised 2.24.05
~: at - 7aJ7-frR-lI0l7 ~.&14
"-J z:t m\ Y\.
'RYe ~Cl--
I ?A
MEMORANDUM
Date: March 4, 200S
To: Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner
Zoning & Land Development Reivew
From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re: Resolution 2008-50
CU-2007-AR-11977
Big Corkscrew Fire Station & Administration
Enclosed please find one copy of the document referenced above,
Agenda Item #7A, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners
on Tuesday, February 26, 2008.
The original document will be kept as part of the Board's permanent
record.
If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-S4ll.
Thank you.
Enclosure
? A ;..~~
RESOLUTION NO. 08- 50
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A
FIRE STATION AND ADMINISTRATION BUILDING IN
THE ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE
COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,
SECTION 2.01.03.G.1.e., FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON
THE EAST SIDE OF DESOTO BOULEVARD NORTH,
OPPOSITE AND NORTH OF 22 A VENUE NE, IN SECTION
28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of
Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to
establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the
protection ofthe public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code
(Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among
which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after notice as in
said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use
for a fire station and administration building in the Estates (E) Zoning District, pursuant to
Land Development Code Section 2.01.03.G.1.e. on the property hereinafter described, and has
found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A") that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been
made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with
Section 10.08.00.D of the Land Development Code, as amended; and
.
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this
Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier
County, Florida, that:
Petition CU-2007-AR-11977, filed by Robert L. Duane, AICP of Hole Montes, Inc.,
representing Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, an Independent Special
District and Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, with respect to the property
hereinafter described as:
Page 1 of2
?A
The South 180 feet of Tract liS, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 72,
according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 8, of the
Public Records of Collier County, Florida, and
The North ISO feet of Tract liS, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 72,
according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 8, of the
Public Records of Collier County, Florida
is hereby approved for a Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.01.03.G.l.e of the Collier
County Land Development Code in the Estates (E) Zoning District, for a fire station and
administration building in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan found in Exhibit "B" and
subject to the conditions found in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated by reference
herein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this
Board.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super-majority vote, this '2foday of
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT~,#~J<;CLERK
.. \.. . ,> ......~ -'"
'./.!:<.~~~.\
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
, Chairman
Exhibits (attached): A. Findings of Fact
B. Conceptual Site Plan, entitled, "Big Corkscrew Island & Rescue
District #14," dated 1/07, which is prepared by Hole Montes, Inc.
C. Conditions
Item #
fA
Page 2 of2
Agenda ~ 7-lc,( c€,
Date
Date -zhs ic6
~
eputy Clerk ~
7A
"'1
'.,1
,
FINDINGS OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-11977
The following facts are found:
1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes / No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes /' No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
_ No affect or V Affect mitigated by '1n . 11' ,,-s ,v'-Q\v'c..*,~,~. ~~kt(
_ Affect cannot be mitigated ~ }
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
Yes L No _~A ~<:" J o~ Vkl h^ 7l\..*'''\..
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
ClWRMANA\ AI\,
DATE:
1('\."\-0;
EXHIBIT A
7A
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-11977
The following facts are found:
1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A.
B.
Consistency ~nd Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes No
Ingress and egress to propeliy and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress ~ress
Yes /' No
C.
boring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
No affect or ~ Affect mitigated by
~ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Yes
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
MEMB~-f
DATE: /I~ If r-(J 7
EXHIBIT A
.. -7' A
' ...G "
&
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-11977
The following facts are found:
1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes r; No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes tli No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
~ No affect or _ Affect mitigated by
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
Yes ~ No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, wit tipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE:--dIS-h
MEMBER:
EXHIBIT A
?A
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-11977
The following facts are found:
1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
'"
Yes' ----No
-+r-
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes~ No_
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
~o affect or _ Affect mitigated by
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
Yes~ No_
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulatiohs, (c
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE: / /1..;/0 7
r I /
/
" /' :--?
MEMBE~/ ~ / Z
. /' / c//~-< /0 T/ /
EXHIBIT A /--uLJ p;e.-,T
---- ~
7A '..-
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-11977
The following facts are found:
1. Section 10.08,00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A. Consistency 11 the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and a cess in case of fire or catastrophe:
Yes
No
c.
/
Arects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
ef cts:
_ No affect or _ Affect mitigated by
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D.
Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
.
Compatible use hithin district
Yes j No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, 'th stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE: II Ii 0
EXHIBIT A
I 7 A
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-11977
The following facts are found:
1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes J No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes J No
c. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
No affect or _ Affect mitigated by
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
yes-0o_
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE II I J 4 I () -) MEMBER'~ ~
EXHIBIT A
fA
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-1l977
The following facts are found:
1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes ~ No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes Vi No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
/ No affect or _ Affect mitigated by
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
Yes ( No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE:
/1/15/07
I /
MEMBER: ;/3vnfVL... 1......2LA f!aJLd---1"L..J
EXHIBIT A
Yt1 \
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007- AR-11977
The following facts are found:
I. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes V No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes 1/ No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
v" No affect or _ Affect mitigated by
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
Yes '\-/ No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE: /(n/5--:'(") 7
MEMBER:
/ L;--L'
/ c--z.. -~ I'?LI
/
EXHIBIT A
.
I
..
.
m ,
Jl Gi ~
m." 0 .
(Jl_ .
OJlO ,
cmJl
mO"
CO(Jl
(jj~g
-iJlm
~O~ "
-i r (jj .
..SlOr
- >
-I>- Z
C
, I" ,
H~! I
~"'~~. ,
I ~ ~ ~
'" "
,,'~~ - -
'" "
!
m
><
:I:
Cll
=4
Cll
~ei
I~
b
~~i
ifid~<o
: e:"i3.! ,
~n . '"
',i~ ?!
II' ",i
~;~H
--_.....-.~-
ilQ!i~
ill!iF
'1'1'1
i~ .
~I:lai~
ajlil~
'!I'
Q"l:
11,;
\l;i
! j~
..I.
~lr
'j
"I
i'
, ,
~
~~ I ~H
,. " i' N
~; : ~ ~
ill Q ~ ~
!,,, ! ~
"lilj il
,l~ n
~o ....
~~~'-
.
9 .!HI!IHiH!~
;t .. a ''jII' "";;I ~ 1
i ..n--I""I
i ,-DH filo'-
! .. HI
If: ........?,<.
' l'
!!
I I . I . I . . , . . . ~ ~
~ i, i~~~ii~~ii~ia
i j
I . . . . . . . I . ~ . .
i:l!"I";:t~l:l;:~~;;~~
5 i i >l ii !O l; ~ .. .. Ii .. 10
~ ~ ~ ~ f6
. ~ III ~ m
~ " ~ 8 z
,0
. . Ul
~ ~ ~ ::s "
. ~ lo
, 0
, ~ m
,
~ ,
, !
!~ll ~l.l ~
~~lil~ .ot'" 2
;ill j'! ~
,0'1 l~"
'~'" l!e ~
~i'~~ i:i'~
~Qi~ !~ili
! II ~ g
11:0
loo
Ulz
""'0
m_
,,""'
rno
-z
""')>
m...
""c:
"'rn
~m
ij!iHII~11
i!!l.a,b
~'>l'l'i,"
'I' ~ i ~ 'j"
~..; c
I ! Ii, iI
i ~ i ~ i:
... 'f'.~
'I ~ l'.l Ii"'
,i III i~
j' ll'
\' ~ '
<
III
hl-
Ih I
\' i
~o I, ~ II ;
~ a ~
~ ~ ~ i ~
o "tI.;.,
. 0
~ - ,
LP
g, J. ~ ~
I !
~ ~ ~ ~i = ~ ~
~ ~ "~z!il ~
IISl;~i9 ~
lli ~ ;I!a <
. I 1.~ ~ m
~ 6 ~;
, ,
.
III
.1,
;ltc
~'.IoC1\I"''''1<.
PIIQP<lSDlAC1Ij,tL_.34.1I'
?A
~ ~:
----~-i---------
, ,
, I
I ,
, ,
, ,
.../ ',~
,/
---",.-
ZONING E - IE states) _n______ ~!!'~-l"-f!~------
---:"~"-~-(~O-O~-~I~~-;;;)---- ~ IIJ ~ \i~
~ lAI I II.~ \
DESOTO BL VD'k1'r~\,,' ",k-;';'~
.. ".. ..
--~~----~~~-------~~
-----------...~
'm'_________
=--
IP<O<W"'"
PR<PO!EIl_l&.J'
". :1
Ii ~ 'i1~ :;:
i I ~", c
~'f '~ i'l
. 0; .,
: I
,
-0
>
. . ~ ~
I I : ~ . ~ "
" , ~0
. si ! 0
I I "
!: ~ , .
0
" , ~
- . e ~ ! 0
,',.
--~-mli \
~ : ~ I
c I, 1
-'
c: }:
Ul ,
m :
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
SOl11l1'tO"W
[XI';Tl/lG"/'" SOO'lI',o-w
J30.00'I':IJO.OII....
- - SOO'9'10'Wl~00'
-llIO.oo' W5~"~ "/'II
,
,
,
: -- -- --7----'
~ 1"";"--------- ~~ --- ( :
t'il I,: 1\" o::{~ t elQJ :
:11: !Ii I),! :
IS I: ~ 6'" a I
\ I( _________.1
: 1.;....-
-.......,. T :
------ -+ '-'-' I
~~ I \
",= ~ ! i
II,
I :
..1
I
i
I
_"iii
rn
H
- 11:
)>
"
~ -<
~
~
>
~
.:
II
-,
"
,
N
o
Z
Z
"
!m
I'
m
~
il"
r;N
!!!oN
~
a.
i~
<'.m
5Z
C
m
Z
m
"-1'
!~~l- :
" ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
"
"
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
~
II
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
"
"
,
,
,
,
,
~ ~
. '
,
,
,
,
,
'N'
,0
z,
"z
."
.'Im
'-''lI
::II!
o
~.
.' ~~!C "
,i,~~-;;
-- it'
lillll--
=.
,~
,m
.,-.
'.
,
',.'
"m'.
'~
."'S'.,'
.CD'"
'_-lI)
,-,
'.;
'-
" '
El; :
, ,
. ,
,
,
,
,
,
" . 'i~!.
,h-
"j.
If
'<::;1Q
. 'n.
j"'li
I!~I \
, ,
,
,
"
"
i:
I'
,
,
,
,
tr-
[l
"
"
IHJDQi
lD"lJ " "lJ" ~
~2 ~ ~2l 16
g~ 0 ~~ ~
8 ~ ~~ 0
c g ~ ~
~> ' ? ~
~ )> ~
~ ;:; ~ ~
Noo'J,'JO'E l~.oo'
mOa~OlI' (;)
ZONING A-MHO
1_.-......'
-E;C;sn;G-~/w----"
i!~
;2~~
Ii:
_.j
'!:
,.
"
,
, !~:-z
.
.
~
J
N
o
Z
Z
"
!m
3'
.... .
, ,
m
~
;;
r;
!!.
~.
:'.
.
III i'
~ ~ I :II
h!! H ~
~i:l ~lii8
!,,'~ II..
lSl ~ ::p.
j"
I
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
FOR
7A
CU-2007-AR-11977
1. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the Master Site Plan, identified as
"Conditional Use Master Site Plan," prepared by Hole Montes, Inc., dated January, 2007.
The site plan noted is conceptual in nature for conditional use approval. The final design
must be in compliance with all applicable federal, state and county laws and regulations.
The Department of Zoning and Land Development Review Director may approve minor
changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements
authorized by this conditional use, so long as these minor changes remain consistent with all
applicable development standards.
2. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this conditional use approval, or major
changes to the approved plan, shall require the submittal of a new conditional use
application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of
submittal, including Chapter 10.02.03, Site Development Plan (SDP) review and approval,
of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 04-41, as amended.
3. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified
to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded
such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low-pressure sodium lamps are
encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged.
a. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a
"cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only
downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage
recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area.
b. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so
that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building
entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated.
4. Along Desoto Boulevard and 22nd Avenue N.E., 30 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated to
Collier County, at no cost, in exchange for relieving the Big Corkscrew Fire District of turn
lane requirements along Desoto Boulevard and nnd Avenue N.E.
EXHIBIT C
G: Current! Gundlach/ Conditional Uses/ Big Corkscrew Fire Admin. Bldg. /Exhibit C Conditions 2-26-08
78
I..'
COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA
REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a:
xxx Normal Legal Advertisement Other:
(Display Adv., location, etc.)
******.**.*...*..***.......*...****..****.......*~*...**** *
Originating Dept! Div: Conun.Dev.Serv./Plannin
Petition No. (If none, give brief descriptio
......~:;:..\.:.i~.:.~
Petitioner: <Name & Address): Stephen J. Fleming, P.E., 20623 East Goidenelm Drive, Estero, FI. 33928
Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Mohammed
M. Rahman, 13056 Valewood Dr., Naples, Fl. 34119
Hearing before Bee
BZA
Other
Requested Hearing date:
Based onadvertisementapp_'
Newspaper(s) to he used: (Complete only if important):
XXX Naples Daily News
Other
Legally Required
Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: ' ohammed M.
Rahman, represented by Stephen J. Fieming, P.E., requesting a variance from ectlon . . S. . 0 teL C to reduce the lot
width along the north and south property line from the required 150 feet to 135 feet, and to reduce the side yard setback along the
west property line from the required 40 feet to 25 feet to pennit an automobile service station. The subject property is located at
2393 Lake Trafford Road, Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Coliier County, Florida.
Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date:
~eadvertisingCost?
Yes
No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs:
Approved by:
i,s(a<
ate
County Manager
Date
DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS
A. For hearings before BeC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval
before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal
review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The
Manager's office will distribute copies:
County Manager agenda file: to
Requesting Division
Original Clerk's Office
B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file.
...........................................................*........**......................
FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY:
Date Receiv___ Date of pUbliChearin____ Date Advertised~f,
RESOLUTION 08-
78
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PETITION
NUMBER VA-2006-AR-lOO92, FOR A 15-FOOT VARIANCE
FROM THE REQUIRED 150-FOOT LOT WIDTH TO 135 FEET
AND A 15-FooT VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED 40-
FOOT SIDE YARD SE113ACK TO 25 FEET FOR A PROPOSED
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION LOCATED AT 2393
LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD, AS FURTHER HEREINAFTER
DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has
conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and
such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code
(Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular
geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a puhlic hearing after notice as in said
regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a ] 5-foot variance from
the required ISO-foot lot width requirement to 135 feet, and a 15-foot variance from the required
40-foot side yard setback to 25 feet, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision
and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations
and in accordance with Sections 5.05.05. and 9.04.00 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land
Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and
WHEREAS, aU interested parties have been given opportunity to he heard hy this Board
in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that
Petition VA-2006-AR-IOOn filed by Stephen J. Fleming, P.E. of SJF and Associates,
Inc., representing Mohammed M. Rahman, with respect to a proposed automobile service station
on property located at 2393 Lake Trafford Road, lmmokaJee, Florida, as further described in the
attached Exhibit B, be and the same hereby is approved for a 15-foot variance from the required
150-foot lot width requirement to 135 feet, and a IS-foot variance from the required 40-foot side
yard setback to 25 feet as shown on the attached site plan. Exhibit A, subject to the following
conditions:
Page I of2
78
1. The 15-foot variances granted are limited to the side yard encroachment for
the proposed convenience store along the west property boundary and to a 15-
foot lot width reduction, as depicted in the applicant's submitted site plan
dated February 14, 2007, included as Exhibit A.
2. In addition to the required landscaping on the outside of the S-foot high wall,
the inside of the wall shall be landscaped with a sinsle ruw 3-foot minimum
high hedge planted a minimum of 3 feet on center and maintained at a
minimum height of 5 feet.
3. There shall be no outdoor speakers except for those required by a governing
authority.
4. Tbe hours of business operation are limited from 5 a.m. to 11 p.m.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number V A-
2006-AR-10092 he recorded in the minutes of this Board.
This Resolution adopted after motion. second and majority vote, this _ day of
,200S.
ATTEST:
DWlGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
, CHAIRMAN
, Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form
and legal sufficiency:
~jeffrey A. K1atzkow
- \) Chief Assistant County Attorney
Attachments:
Exhibit A - Site Plan dated February 14, 2007
Exhibit B - Legal Description
Pase 2 of2
B
I ":i '1IIi1iii'1l1!:11 ::"111111'
! I!, ! _j .!!'il~ p, :. 'Il, ~
i !:i~ ~. ;;;!ili~~:~l~i ~!; &1 =11
. ad' !t~~..~l;".II,':l1{ .~...< "lI:!1
1I l"'-,~ lL(.."'fl\&~Il~I-" ,~a l, '
~; ~l!I'!.:'1 1'"".. $ 1; i'< .!
! I~~~ i~ ~~ $i~!{;i~~l ~! ~'! ~:
I..:;! '.''"''''I"..llo1r I.' \'
~ "i I~" -..Il ~ P, ..
j :: J.. l::~i .; lIC.lI<l\;::~ ';" 'u. -.!i
. I '1,,;II,I";i;~ II 11
.: ~ i "1..1 "If ,~ j!:l ~,~ t.o:
'" ., ->~} ~
;liiil,i;;il!i!iiil!!1
;~I j h. -~ s.!S
'! - !"
.. ~.
....
I
'I ,- ~
.... -. I
..........)..-- l:
.... ~--""f.... .... !,
i11ii111! ' J
I!~_+l ~
'!I ~
if,l. i I
"l' "
!ill~ : ,; 1~
. · 1'1
ii ; IlJ: i[ I
~L~_~ -=.
~
f
\~
Ir..!;........"..'.".
'''Wj'!f~fi~i!1
jlll'l:IU!!!jl
i, I,Jli~J!1
Ill"
f:
....
.;
,;.
,
-.,'
11 ~
~".;''''''''''
-~-_.........-.-..
....
,~,e
~~ ....
I-~~l "'t m
II ~ .
- I
1....\
[ .
~
......J .
~j It t\
"
,
" 1111,
;11l' .
, g'
liG
ili
"
....... i~
; .
'" ~
>,.J
I
,
"
----{-~-~(ii"iJWI--~-
"
1+ "'" -
t!~, "to-
....
~i z ~m ~ e 0 '"
0 il m r'1
"" 0
r'1 ~~u ~ c
i~ iln R r'1
~. ~" ~~~ U)
;!l;;jn u> ~~ ""
r .~.~ss r'1
!~ . il i~ 0
,I e~n ~~ :;
~ !~ I '"
.c. 'i>
~; s~s~ z
. . ()
" ~ ~ f"l
~
i
~~..~
~}~'
,c
~~
~:I~
n I
(fJ ~ 1-
lJ~.i
.
,-:;,...,..., I
!~(I:~r'~ i
'~~I
~."..
S1R~ fCl. n~u-n-UXll~J(Ull
MINI-SUPERMARKET
Loke Trafford Rood, Immokolee, FL
CONCEPTU.....L SIT[ PLAN
STEI'H(~ J. FLEMING 6: ASSOOAlES. INC.
._s._......_-.._.....,..
_1"'1_' ,..(...j....._
Q~"""'T CHl:0<aI1' _~n
S.f 5J' S.f'
0"11 ~"o.ott:r ..UwKII
EXHIBIT "A"
18
'.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Description of parcel lying in the East Yz of the Northeast Y. of the Southwest Y. of Section
32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida.
Commencing at the Northeast comer of the East Yz ofthe Northeast Y. of the Southwest Y.
of Section 32, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida, run South
88049'30" West 663.40 feet; thence South 01"03'30" East 39.37 feet to the Point of
Beginning, said point being at the Intersection of the West line of said East Yz of the
Northeast Y. of Southwest Y. and the South line of Lake Trafford Road; thence continue
South 01003'30" East 290.63 feet; thence North 89001'00. East 135.00 feet to the West
boundary of Warden Lane; thence North 01003'30" West 290.59 feet along said West
boundary to the South boundary of Lake .Trafford Road; thence South 89003'30. West
135.00 feet along said boundary to the Point of Beginning.
EXHIBIT "B"
?B
.".:,..
January 17,2008
Attn: Legals
Naples Daily News
1075 Central Avenue
Naples, FL 34102
Re: Petition V A-2006-AR-10092: Mini-Supermarket
Dear Legals:
Please advertise the above referenced petition on Sunday, January 27, 2008 and
kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved
to this office.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Ann Jennejohn,
Deputy Clerk
P.O./Account # 113-138312-649110
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
18
Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 12,
2008, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier
County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples,
Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M.
The Board will consider Petition VA-2006-AR-10092, Mohammed M.
Rahman, represented by Stephen J. Fleming, P.E., requesting a
variance from Section 5.05.05.B of the LDC to reduce the lot width
along the north and south property line from the required 150 feet
to 135 feet, and to reduce the side yard setback along the west
property line from the required 40 feet to 25 feet to permit an
automobile service station. The subject property is located at
2393 Lake Trafford Road, Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29
East, Collier County, Florida.
NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must
register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of
the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be
limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual
to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If
recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or
organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item.
Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in
the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3
weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case,
written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be
submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days
prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations
before the Board will become a permanent part of the record.
Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need
a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may
need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is based.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
'eOlli1tyof Collier
\,~
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY d:OURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI l(~AIL EAST
P.O. B01( 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDAtlI01-30~4
...
?B
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
January 17,2008
Mohammed M. Rahman
13056 Valewood Drive
Naples, FL 34119
RE: V A-2006-AR-10092: Mini-Supermarket
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 12, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, January 27, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK.
Ann~~O~~~
Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.clerk.coIlier.tl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerkia1clerk.collier.tl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
.,eOl:lI1ty pf C6l1ier
L-'
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY d::OURT~OUSE
330 I T AMIAMI 1(\l,AIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA ':t1]() 1-30~4
-,
78 ~'i
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
January 17,2008
Stephen J. Fleming, P.E.
20623 East Goldenelm Drive
Estero, FL 33928
RE: V A-2006-AR-I0092: Mini-Supermarket
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 12, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, January 27, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
llu...u- ~,Q.e.
Ann Jennejohn,
Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.t1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk\alclerk.collier.t1.us
Ann P. Jennejohn
'?8
To:
Subject:
legals@naplesnews.com
VA-2006-AR-10092 Mini-Supermarket
Attachments:
VA-2006-AR-1 0092.doc; VA-2006-AR-1 0092.doc
Good Morning,
Please advertise the attached on Sunday, January 27, 2008.
~
~
VA-2006-AR-10092
.doc (24 KB)
VA-2006-AR-10092
.doc (23 KB)
Thank you,
Ann
Senior Clerk to the Board
Minutes & Records Department
252-8406
(ann.jennejohn@coll ierclerk.com)
78 "'-I
Ann P. Jennejohn
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
postmaster@collierclerk.com
Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:55 AM
Ann P. Jennejohn
Delivery Slatus Notification (Relay)
Attachments:
ATT190644.txt; VA-2006-AR-10092 Mini-Supermarket
[J"
:~';;-
,"""
1:::-::1
L.:::J
ATT190644.txt
(229 B)
VA-2006-AR-10092
Mini-Supermar.... .
This IS an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients. but the requested delivery
status notifications may not be generated by the destination.
legals@naplesnews.com
1
V A-2006-AR-l 0092 Mini-Supermarket
Page 1 of 1
78
Ann P. Jennejohn
From: Riley, Becky [BRiley@Naplesnews.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1: 15 PM
To: Ann P. Jennejohn
Subject: RE: VA-2006-AR-10092 Mini-Supermarket
ok
From: Ann P. Jennejohn [mailto:AnnJennejohn@collierclerk.com]
Posted At: Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:55 AM
Posted To: Legals Done - NDN
Conversation: VA-2006-AR-10092 Mini-Supermarket
Subject: VA-2006-AR-10092 Mini-Supermarket
Good Morning,
Please advertise the attached on Sunday, January 27, 2008.
<<V A-2006-AR-1 0092.doc>>
<<VA-2006-AR-10092.doc>>
Thank you,
Ann
Senior Clerk to the Board
Minutes & Records Department
252-8406
(ann.j ennej ohn@collierclerk.com)
1/22/2008
Th.Th,
NAPLES DAILY NEWS
Pubhshed Dailv
Naples. FL .j.j 1112
Affidavit of Publication
State of Florida
County of Collier
Beforc thc undcrsigned Ihcy scrvc as thc authority, pcrsonally
appeared B.,Lamb, who on oath says that thcy
sef\e as thc Assistant Corporatc Seerctary of the Naples Daily,
a daiiy newspaper pubhshed at Naples, in Colher County,
Florida: distributed in Collicr and Lee countics of Florida: that
the attached copy of the advertising, being a
PUBLIC NOTICE
111 the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE
was published in said nc\vspapcr I time in the issue
On Januarv 27'''. 200g
\nlant (llther savs lh,lt Ih.:: said N~plcs Daily \"c\Vs i~ a n.::wspapcr
Puhlished at Naples. in collier county, Florida and that the said
ncwspapcr has herdofofc been continuously published in said Collier
County, Florida~ distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida,
each day and has been entered as second class mail matkr at the post
omc.:: in i\aples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of I
y<,ar I1c:\1 preceding the firs! puhlication oflhe attached copy of
adver1iscmcnL and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor
promised allY 1l<.;r~OIl, finn 01 ..:orporati\>ll any di.~~:()unL rebate,
commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for
pnbli"t"'" ;).";~:7~
( Signatufc of aman!)
Sworn to and subsenbed before Ille
This 27"'.
]),jy or January 2008
I". -
(S;g;li~~;/~~taT)' pu~L'<'&>0
FEI5lJ-2578:l27
,""~"f""
i~~'!I''' ~~,
~*: :*:
~~' .{.:i
'.:~ '.0'1:-,.
"'.9~.f"",
JUDY JANES
Commission DD 675029
Expires May 16, 2011
!londed llmJ r ray F~ln IflSuranoe I~Olhlll.5-701 S
,." 7 B
01. ......
..
........
DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLE~~, lerk
8Y:Ann~nne)otm.De~~1 C
IAlYlJllnI .
Nn la::nfl'11
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing stip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Ofiice only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
ex tion of the Chairman's si -nature, draw a line thrall h roulin lines # I thrall #4, com lete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson line #5 .
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
List in routin order
2.
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records
Clerk ofCourl's Office
/
78
, f"f
\.
J. u,. of'
PRIMARY CONT ACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.
Phone Number
Agenda Item Number
Number of Original
Documents Attached
252-
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/ A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
I. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. 1hat have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.)
2. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
3. The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
4. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si ature and initials are re uired.
5. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the Bee's actions are nullified. Be aware 0 our deadlines!
6. The document was approved by the BCC on enter date) and all changes
made during the meeting have been incorporated in th attached document. The
Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable.
~:cYt:s~c~r:Me~Jr!22~~so~~'~, Revised 2605. Revised 2.24.05
f13
.,
,
MEMORANDUM
Date: March 4, 2008
To: Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner
Zoning & Land Development Reivew
From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re: Resolution 2008-51
V A-2006-AR-I0092
Mini-Supermarket
Enclosed please find one copy of the document referenced above,
Agenda Item #7B, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners
on Tuesday, February 26, 2008.
The original document will be kept as part of the Board's permanent
record.
If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-8411.
Thank you.
Enclosure
"18
RESOLUTION 08- ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PETITION
NUMBER VA-2006-AR-I0092, FOR A IS-FOOT VARIANCE
FROM THE REQUIRED ISO-FOOT LOT WIDTH TO 135 FEET
AND A IS-FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED 40-
FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK TO 25 FEET FOR A PROPOSED
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION LOCATED AT 2393
LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD, AS FURTHER HEREINAFTER
DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has
conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and
such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code
(Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular
geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after notice as in said
regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a IS-foot variance from
the required ISO-foot lot width requirement to 135 feet, and a IS-foot variance from the required
40-foot side yard setback to 25 feet, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision
and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations
and in accordance with Sections 5.05.05. and 9.04.00 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land
Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board
in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that
Petition VA-2006-AR-I0092 filed by Stephen J. Fleming, P.E. of SJF and Associates,
Inc., representing Mohammed M. Rahman, with respect to a proposed automobile service station
on property located at 2393 Lake Trafford Road, Immokalee, Florida, as further described in the
attached Exhibit B, be and the same hereby is approved for a IS-foot variance from the required
ISO-foot lot width requirement to 135 feet, and a IS-foot variance from the required 40-foot side
yard setback to 25 feet as shown on the attached site plan, Exhibit A, subject to the following
conditions:
Page I of2
?B ,~
1. The 15- foot variances granted are limited to the side yard encroachment for
the proposed convenience store along the west property boundary and to a 15-
foot lot width reduction, as depicted in the applicant's submitted site plan
dated February 14,2007, included as Exhibit A.
2. In addition to the required landscaping on the outside of the 8-foot high wall,
the inside of the wall shall be landscaped with a single row 3-foot minimum
high hedge planted a minimum of 3 feet on center and maintained at a
minimum height of 5 feet.
3. There shall be no outdoor speakers except for those required by a governing
authority.
4. The hours of business operation are limited to 5 a.m. to II p.m.
5. "NO LOITERING" signs shall be posted in appropriate locations on the
building and in the parking area.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number V A-
2006-AR-10092 be recorded in the minutes of this Board.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote, this 2w day of
FeIovuavy ,2008. .
.-~ L,,~;,
.,,~~ ~.It.gr~i;:'-~.
ATTEST,.\ \ " ""'. 'C",
J,)' '. <iO,.
DWI9.HT~. BRDCk.WRK
Qj~~~~~8f2t ~L
Atttst..to..Ch<<(~puty Clerk
11...tn.l~.'
App ved as to form
and gal ffi i
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COL.LIEYOUNTY FLORID~
By: .:JfJ1--
TOM HENNING, CHAIRM
Jeffre
Chief
nty Attorney
Attachments:
Exhibit A - Site Plan dated February 14,2007
Exhibit B - Legal Description
Item # --'J.b.
Page 2 of2
,,:.. il\
.."_.~--~.J. .\'-
" ..;.-_~~"^....<"~ 't., 'q, (A'C':-, \
.~_........ . t' ',.kl:.<\\
,'.........._ ~:..,~"".. il~; ....
.,,,,,---..-,--....-
~ €Hi l;~
~ !~i= ~~
i g~,Ii~ ~~~
i ~~ 1;'
~ l!. ~:;''i
'!: ,,;:l~-..
~ ..~j\.!
i1 t. ~
~ U".; z
i'
~
!~i~~lii:!n;~~
t,8;i'i"l~.l~~;"fjOE" f
.~~;f\(~~_~.. i~~ Ii i
i!:._~~ Il".;'; _~. ~ l( ...~
:;~~;~~~H;~~~~
iJ "~.~~"'~ "'h!!i~"'"
l!lmmm!~
~~ ":U...l( ~ ~
Eit; "~li
"'!', ~,,"
I'i." f~l-l
,: ."
~~ ~~~
i~ i1
R"' ~s.
::;$ ~'"
'!" ..'
.. -~
f,"1 :ti-"
~<;. -~fi
~~ t:
,
~~.~lj;lI~~~~'-StH.' ~!i
iitii.~~it~~i;i ~~~$~~
1J~t.t' ~i....~~-!i hiil
!i~)'i~ ~H'I-!~ shr
~i ,. ~ t:~
~,"l>\
."
...~r-
;,%l
-~~~-
"'~.,.
r;;>-"
'.,
:l; ~;
~~
!i
1.~
'.'
I.;
!r.:!~-<,*,~..".".
ijimi.\~i~B~:~~
;~ t~;~JI~~~'l~~~fi
i-<~i.ni;~~~~
~ ~n~,tid~
lf~~ ,;;~
1f'l ~
t'
i
i
!
!
'+.,. \-
~:~.
"
,.
"
~.=e
"
~l .~, ~
':;'.~ .
--)~.i "
IV!.. ~
l"j! . ~
\!u r
__.-----1i
j" i
. "
II
1\'
,
ii!!!
~~~ij~
~ '
"
~,
.
,.,
"
....
'.... '"
!
------{-~-~~-~-~---
"
"
.. z (j)
~~ ~~~:Il e
~< 0 fTl
.~ ...; ~-<~~ ...; 0<
u
<< fTl ~~-<-< OJ .'
~~ (j) 001010 )> rn~
W=;<:ll;l ~o
~l= ~i'i''f n .m
m~ ^ ~l
.0 ;;::.,,~g
.. mm."." (j)
.m ....,~$m
o. i~
~~ h'~ ffie
~~~i
~~~ ~.
~~ ~~
z, ~bl~O ~8
~~ <>.,,"'::
.0 ;;::mill~ <0
~~ .s
~. ~.~~ ~z
f II 0
~ .
~
~
~
"
o ~,I
(j) ~ ~..
\J ~ J
z
{(f!r~) i
.,.,..Y~; I
,.~,!...~,.
lake
STll/lPNO. xx-xx-xx-xxxx-xxu
MINI-SUPERMARKET
Trafford Road, Immokolee, FL
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
''"
......
EXHIBIT "A"
rr~l~-~~rl' ~~ I~i
! ~: K~"' i j i i J
li!!-j..q-j I
. :~:
, ,-;'- i i i I ~,'
i ~ ~ lii~,
,"'" Iii'
!Hi ~ -l"._.~__.l.:i
..l'. 'I!. ! 1 ~! .I!. 1~
,1:1 i I i'~ ~
i ;... ~i ~ i ~ i ~I,: \
' ~ ,.; :: ' ~ I ~',
:'~~L._,___L-.:u_.u
II
{
\"
fB
/
"
liG
iI!
"
~~
\Ii
"-
iil\ ,~
'''ILl'
~ I"
i
o
::0
fTl
o
C
fTl
(j)
...;
fTl
o
<
)>
::0
)>
Z
n
fTl
~~~~
~~
~5~
~~~
;:;~~
~;;!m
~~~
.m
~m
~~
<
.
.
c
<
'I
!
~: =-=-
REVISIONS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Description of parcel lying in the East Yz of the Northeast Yo of the Southwest Yo of Section
32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida.
Commencing at the Northeast corner of the East Yz of the Northeast Yo of the Southwest X
of Section 32, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida, run South
88049'30" West 663.40 feet; thence South 01003'30" East 39.37 feet to the Point of
Beginning, said point being at the intersection of the West line of said East Yz of the
Northeast Y. of Southwest Yo and the South line of Lake Trafford Road; thence continue
South 01003'30" East 290.63 feet; thence North 89001'00" East 135.00 feet to the West
boundary of Warden Lane; thence North 01003'30" West 290.59 feet along said West
boundary to the South boundary of Lake .Trafford Road; thence South 89003'30" West
135.00 feet along said boundary to the Point of Beginning.
EXHIBIT "B"
78'
8A
January 31, 2008
Attn: Legals
Naples Daily News
1075 Central Avenue
Naples, Florida 34102
Re: BCC-LDC AD
Dear Legals:
Please publish the following public notice, for a Display, V. page, with map
attached, in your edition of Saturday, February 16, 2008 and furnish proof of
publication of advertisement to the Collier County Community Development and
Environmental Services Building, Department of Zoning and Land
Development Review, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104,
Attention: Heather Ramirez and
PLEASE SEND DUPICATE ORIGINAL to Collier County Attorneys Office,
2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104, Attention: Jeffrey A.
Klatzkow, and also to the Board Minutes and Records Department.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Teresa Polaski,
Deputy Clerk
P.O./Account # 113-138312-649110
8A
Department of Zoning and Land Development Review
January 30, 2008
Naples Daily News
1075 Central A venue
Naples, Florida 33940
ATTENTION: LEGAL ADVERTISING
Dear Ms. Perrell:
Please publish the following public notice, for a Display, V. page, with map attached, Legal Notice in
your edition of Saturday, February 16 and furnish proof of publication of each advertisement to the
Collier County Development Services Building, Department of Zoning and Land Development Review,
2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104, Attention: Heather Ramirez and
PLEASE SEND DUPICATE ORIGINAL to Jeffrey A. Klatzkow, Esquire, CACA, Collier County Attorneys
Office, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104.
February 26, 2008
NOTICE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHANGE
LDC AMENDMENT CYCLE 2008-1a
Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, February 26 at 9:00 a.m., during its regular meeting in
the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, 3'd Floor, Building "F," Collier County
Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Collier County Board of
County Commissioners proposes to take under advisement an amendment to the Collier County
Land Development Code, the title of which is as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED,
THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,
WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND
REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY PROVIDING FOR:
SECTION ONE, RECITALS; SECTION TWO, FINDINGS OF
FACT; SECTION THREE, ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS
TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, MORE
SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING: SECTION
1.04.04 REDUCTION OF REQUIRED SITE DESIGN
REQUIREMENTS BY PROVIDING THAT AN EXISTING
CONFORMING OR NON-CONFORMING LOT, PARCEL OR
YARD MAY BE REDUCED IN ITS DEGREE OF
COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE WHERE A PORTION OF
SAID LOT, PARCEL OR YARD IS BEING ACQUIRED FOR
PRESENT OR PLANNED PUBLIC USE AND/OR PURPOSE
BY COLLIER COUNTY OR ANOTHER GOVERNMENTAL
8A
ENTITY OR BY A PRIVATE PARTY UNDER AN
AGREEMENT WITH COLLIER COUNTY OR ANOTHER
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY, AND PROVIDING THAT A
LEGAL NON-CONFORMING LOT OR PARCEL OF LESS
THAN FIVE (5) ACRES OR A CONFORMING LOT OF FIVE
(5) ACRES OR MORE SHALL RETAIN ITS STATUS AS
NON-CONFORMING OR CONFORMING AND ITS
ELIGIBILITY TO SEVER TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT
RIGHTS CREDITS WHERE A PORTION OF THE LOT OR
PARCEL IS ACQUIRED FOR A PRESENT OR PLANNED
PUBLIC USE AND/OR PURPOSE BY COLLIER COUNTY
OR ANOTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR BY A
PRIVATE PARTY UNDER AN AGREEMENT WITH COLLIER
COUNTY OR ANOTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY;
SECTION FOUR, CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY;
SECTION FIVE, PUBLICATION AS THE COLLIER COUNTY
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AND SECTION SIX,
EFFECTIVE DATE.
All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ordinance are
available for public inspection in the Zoning and Land Development Review Section, Community
Development Services Center, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, between the hours of
8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission
with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the
proceedings, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal
is to be based.
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY: TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN
8A
Teresa L. Polaski
To:
Subject:
legals@naplesnews.com
LDC AMendment Cycle 2008-1a Ad
Attachments:
BCC LDC Cycle 2008-1a.doc; LDC Amendment Cycle 2008-1 a.doc
Legals,
Please advertise the following on Saturday, February 16, 2008. Thank you
BCC LDC Cycle LDC Amendment
200B-la.doc (29. Cycle 200B-la.do...
Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III
Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners
Minutes and Records Department
239-252-8411
(T eresa.Po las ki@collierclerk.com)
8A
Teresa L. Polaski
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
postmaster@collierclerk.com
Monday, February 04, 2008 8: 19 AM
Teresa L. Polaski
Delivery Status Notification (Relay)
Attachments:
ATT649057.txt; LDC Amendment Cycle 2008-1a Ad
D"
,
[J
ATT649057.txt
(231 B)
LDC Amendment
Cycle 200B-la Ad...
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested
delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination.
legals@naplesnews.com
I
LDC Amendment Cycle 2008-1 a Ad
Page I of I
8A
Teresa L. Polaski
From:
Sent:
To:
Perrell, Pam [PPerrell@Naplesnews.com]
Monday, February 04, 2008 9:14 AM
Teresa L. Polaski
Subject: RE: LDC Amendment Cycle 2008-1a Ad
OK
From: Teresa L. Polaski [mailto:Teresa.Polaski@collierclerk.com]
Posted At: Monday, February 04,20088:19 AM
Posted To: Legals - NDN
Conversation: LDC Amendment Cycle 2008-1a Ad
Subject: LDC Amendment Cycle 2008-1a Ad
Legals,
Please advertise the following on Saturday, February 16, 2008. Thank you
<<BCC LDC Cycle 2008-1 a.doc>> <<LDC Amendment Cycle 2008-1 a.doc>>
Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III
Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners
Minutes and Records Department
239-252-8411
(T eresa.Po laski@collierclerk.com)
2/4/2008
t B A
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNA TURE
Plint on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
excention of the Chairman's sicrnature, draw a line throup-h routinlf lines #1 throuph #4, comnlete the checklist, and fOlWard to Sue Filson line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Iuitials Date
(List in routinO' order)
1.
2.
3.
4. Catherine Fabacher, LDC Manager Zoning & Land Development Review CAF
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending BCC approval. NormalJy the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact infonnation is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the BCC Chainnan's signature are to be delivered to the BCC office only after the BCC has acted to approve the
item)
Name of Primary Staff Catherine Fabacher, LDC Manager Phone Number 252-2322
Contact
Agenda Date Item was February 26, 2008 Agenda Item Number 8-A
Aooroved bv the BCC
Type of Document Ordinance dDD~ -t 0 Number of Original One
Attached Documents Attached
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signedlinitialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
hy the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executcd by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC oftjce within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the Bee's actions are nullifIed. Be aware of your deadlines!
Tbe document was approved by tbe BCC oU 2/19/08 and all cbanges made duriug tbe
meetiug bave heeu incorporated in tbe attached document. The County Attoruey's
Office has reviewed the chao es, if a Iicable.
CAF
Yes
(Initial)
CAF
N/A(Not
A licable)
2.
CAF
3.
CAF
4.
CAF
5.
CAF
6.
I: Formsl County Fonns/ BCC Fonnsl Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
04-COA-OI t9011116
ORDINANCE NO. 08-~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED,
THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,
WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND
REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY PROVIDING FOR:
SECTION ONE, RECITALS; SECTION TWO, FINDINGS OF
FACT; SECTION THREE, ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS
TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, MORE
SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING: CHAPTER
1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS, INCLUDING SECTION 1.04.04
REDUCTION OF REQUIRED SITE DESIGN
REQUIREMENTS; SECTION FOUR, CONFLICT AND
SEVERABILITY; SECTION FIVE, PUBLICATION AS THE
COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AND
SECTION SIX, EFFECTIVE DATE.
Recitals
WHEREAS, on October 30, 1991, the Collier County Board of
County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 91-102, the Collier
County Land Development Code (hereinafter LDC), which was
subsequently amended; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners
(Board) on June 22, 2004, adopted Ordinance No. 04-41, which
repealed and superseded Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended, the
Collier County Land Development Code, which had an effective date of
October 18, 2004; and
WHEREAS, the LDC may not be amended more than two times
in each calendar year unless additional amendment cycles are
approved by the Collier County Board of Commissioners pursuant to
Section 10.02.09 A. of the LDC; and
WHEREAS, this is the second amendment to the LDC for the
calendar year 2007; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 1997, the Board adopted Resolution
97-177 establishing local requirements and procedures for amending
the LDC; and
WHEREAS, all requirements of Resolution 97-177 have been
met; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, in a manner
prescribed by law, did hold an advertised public hearing on February
26, 2008 and did take action concerning these amendments to the LDC;
and
WHEREAS, the subject amendments to the LDC are hereby
determined by this Board to be consistent with and to implement the
Collier County Growth Management Plan as required by Subsections
163.3194 (1) and 163.3202 (1), Florida Statutes; and
Page 1 of 6
Words struok through are deleted, words underlined are added
~ B A
~,'~
WHEREAS, this Ordinance is adopted in compliance with and
pursuant to the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land
Development Regulation Act (F.S. ~ 163.3161 et seq.), and F.S. ~
125.01 (1 )(t) and (1 )(w); and
WHEREAS; this Ordinance is adopted pursuant to the
constitutional and home rule powers of Fla. Const. Art. VIII, ~ 1(g); and
WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural
requirements of the law have otherwise been met.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE:
RECITALS
The foregoing Recitals are true and correct and incorporated by
reference herein as if fully set forth.
SECTION TWO: FINDINGS OF FACT
The Board of Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby
makes the following findings of fact:
1. Collier County, pursuant to Sec. 163.3161, et seq., Fla.
Stat., the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land
Development Regulations Act (herein after the "Act"), is required to
prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan.
2. After adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, the Act and in
particular Section 163.3202(1). Fla. Stat., mandates that Collier County
adopt land development regulations that are consistent with and
implement the adopted comprehensive plan.
3. Section 163.3201, Fla. Stat., provides that it is the intent
of the Act that the adoption and enforcement by Collier County of land
development regulations for the total unincorporated area shall be
based on, be related to, and be a means of implementation for, the
adopted comprehensive plan.
4. Section 163.3194(1)(b), Fla. Stat., requires that all land
development regulations enacted or amended by Collier County be
consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion
thereof, and any land regulations existing at the time of adoption which
are not consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan, or element or
portion thereof, shall be amended so as to be consistent.
5. Section 163.3202(3), Fla. Stat., states that the Act shall
be construed to encourage the use of innovative land development
regulations.
6. On January 10, 19a9, Collier County adopted the Collier
County Growth Management Plan (hereinafter the "Growth
Management Plan" or "GMP") as its comprehensive plan pursuant to
the requirements of Sec. 163.3161 et seq., Fla. Stat., and Rule 9J-5
FAC.
Page 2 of 6
Words Gtruck through are deleted, words underlined are added
t B A
7. Section 163.3194(1 )(a), Fla. Stat., mandates that after a
comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, has been adopted in
conformity with the Act, all development undertaken by, and all actions
taken in regard to development orders by, governmental agencies in
regard to land covered by such comprehensive plan, or element or
portion thereof shall be consistent with such comprehensive plan or
element or portion thereof.
8. Pursuant to Sec. 163.3194(3)(a), Fla. Stat., a
development order or land development regulation shall be consistent
with the comprehensive plan if the land uses, densities or intensities in
the cornprehensive plan and if it meets all other criteria enumerated by
the local government.
9. Section 163.3194(3)(b), Fla. Stat., requires that a
development approved or undertaken by a local government shall be
consistent with the comprehensive plan if the land uses, densities or
intensities, capacity or size, timing, and other aspects of development
are compatible with, and further the objectives, policies, land uses,
densities, or intensities in the comprehensive plan and if it meets all
other criteria enumerated by the local government.
10. On October 30, 1991, Collier County adopted the Collier
County Land Development Code, which became effective on November
13, 1991 and may be amended twice annually. The Land Development
Code adopted in Ordinance 91-102 was recodified and superseded by
Ordinance 04-41.
11. Collier County finds that the Land Development Code is
intended and necessary to preserve and enhance the present
advantages that exist in Collier County; to encourage the most
appropriate use of land, water and resources consistent with the public
interest; to overcome present handicaps; and to deal effectively with
future problems that may result from the use and development of land
within the total unincorporated area of Collier County and it is intended
that this Land Development Code preserve, promote, protect and
improve the public health, safety, comfort, good order, appearance,
convenience and general welfare of Collier County; to prevent the
overcrowding of land and avoid the undue concentration of population;
to facilitate the adequate and ellicient provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, schools, parks, recreational facilities, housing and
other requirements and services; to conserve, develop, utilize and
protect natural resources within the jurisdiction of Collier County; to
protect human, environmental, social and economic resources; and to
maintain through orderly growth and development, the character and
stability of present and future land uses and development in Collier
County.
12. It is the intent of the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County to implement the Land Development Code in accordance
Page 3 of 6
Words 8lruck through are deleted, words underlined are added
, SA
SA
with the provisions of the Collier County Comprehensive Plan, Chapter
125, Fla. Stat., and Chapter 163, Fla. Stat., and through these
amendments to the Code.
SECTION THREE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
CODE
SUBSECTION 3.A. AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 1.04.04 REDUCTION OF REQUIRED
SITE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
Section 1.04.04 Reduction of Required Site Design Requirements, of Ordinance 04-41,
as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended to read as
follows:
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1.04.04 Reduction of Required Site Design Requirements
A. No part of a required yard, required open space, required off-street
parking space, or required off-street loading space, provided in
connection with one building, structure, or use shall be included as
meeting the requirements for any other, structure, or use, except where
specific provision is made in this LDC.
B. Minimum standards; nonconformities created by public acquisition.
1. All lots or yards created after the effective date of this Code [Feb.
14, 2006] must comply with the requirements then established by
this Code.
2. No lot, even though it may consist of one or more abutting lots of
record, or yard, existing at the effective date of this Code [Feb.
14,2006] or lawfully existing on the effective date [Feb. 14, 2006J
of applicable amendments to this Code shall thereafter be
reduced in its degree of compliance, including its size, dimension,
or area, below the minimum requirements then set forth in this
Code, except by reason of a portion thereof being acquired for
present or planned public use bv the followina partv or parties: (i)
Collier Countv; (Ii) another aovernmental entitv or entities
includina the State of Florida, Bia Cvpress Basin, South Florida
Water Manaaement District. Florida Department of Transportation
and public utilitv companies providina public service; (iii) private
utilitv companies providina public service; and/or (Iv) a private
party or parties under an aareement with Collier County or another
aovernmental entity or entities containina provisions for said
private party or parties to make such acauisition and for the future
transfer of ownership (fee or easement interest) to Collier County
or another aovernmental entitv or entities. in any manner,
including dedication, condemnation, purchase, and the like.
a. Required yards on improved lots, lot area, lot
coverage on improved lots, and lot dimensions
rendered nonconforming or more legally
nonconforming as a result of being acquired for present
or planned public use by the party or parties described in
B.2. above may be reduced by the same dimension, area,
or amount involved in the dedication, condemnation,
purchase, or similar method of acquisition for publio usa,
but shall not result in a front yard of less than ten feet
(10') in depth. Acoordingly, the resulting degree of
nonconformity of the area and dimensions of a lot and
the required yards with this Code's then current
requirements will be deemed lawful unless or until the
remaining lot or yard is recreated, typically by re-
development, re-plat or lot re-combination, at which time
such lots and yards must comply with the requirements
Page 4 of 6
Words ctrucl\ through are deleted, words underlined are added
8A
then established by this Code. Further, no conforming lot
otherwise qualifying for a lot split or lot line adjustment
pursuant to Section 10.02.02. 8.8; 10.02.02, 8.12, 1.04.04
or 9.03.03.A 5 may be denied such approval solely on the
grounds that the resulting lot or lots would be less than
the required minimum area for such lot(s) in the
applicable zoning district as a result of acquisition, from
Feb. 14, 2006.
b. Other existing site related legal nonconformities,
including those rendered more nonconforming as a
result of acquisition for present or planned public use Qy
the partv or parties described in 8.2. above and which
pertain to this Code's or other county code requirements,
such as, but not limited to, stormwater management,
landscaping or buffers, preserves, on- or off-site parking,
architectural design standards, etc., will be deemed legally
nonconforming , and all such resulting nonconformities
may be allowed to remain so nonconforming , unless or
until the remaining lot or yard is subsequently re-
created or re-developed, at which time such site related
nonconformities and development must comply with the
then existing requirements of this Code.
c. In those circumstances where acquisition for present or
planned public use, bv the partv or parties described in
8.2. above, of a portion of a lot or yard would result in
one or more nonconformities that would require approval
of a development order or permit in order to implement
the terms of the acquisition, i.e., in order to cure or remedy
the effect of an acquisition, (e.g., an SOP or building permit
required to relocate a prior existing building), the County
manager, or designee, is authorized to approve such
development order or permit so long as any prior existing
legal nonconformity of the type set forth in b. above
would not be increased.
d. A leqal non-conforminq lot or parcel of less than five (5)
acres desiqnated as RFMU sendinq lands or otherwise
eliqible for TOR severance that was in existence as of
June 22. 1999. which is later reduced in size or rendered
more non-conforminq as a result of a portion thereof beinq
acquired for present or planned public use bv Collier
Countv or another partv or parties as described in 8.2.
above, mav be reduced bv the same dimension, area, or
amount involved in the dedication. condemnation,
purchase or similar method of acquisition and the resultinq
lol(s) or parcel(s) not so acquired shall be deemed a leqal
non-conforminq lot or parcel of less than five (5) acres
entitled to severance of base and bonus TOR credits at a
rate of 1 TOR credit per leqal non-conforminq lot or parcel
pursuant to Section 2.03.07 O. 4. of the LOC.
3. A lot or parcel five (5) acres or larqer desiqnated as RFMU
sendinq lands or otherwise eliqible for TOR severance. which is
later reduced in size as a result of a portion thereof beinq acquired
for present or planned public use bv the partv or parties described
in 8.2. above. mav be reduced bv the same dimension. area. or
amount involved in the dedication. condemnation. purchase or
similar method of acquisition and the number of base and bonus
TOR credits qenerated from such resultinq lol(s) or parcel(s) not
so acquired shall be calculated pursuant to Section 2.03.07 O. 4.
of the LOC based on the lot or parcel acreaqe which existed prior
to the dedication, condemnation. purchase or similar method of
acquisition.
Page 5 of 6
Words ()truGI( through are deleted, words underlined are added
SA
3~. This section may be applied to those acquisitions occurring prior
to the adoption of this ordinance so long as the purchase or
dedication of the property has not closed, or the condemnation
proceeding relating to the property acquired has not reached final
disposition.
C. Other than provided for immediately above, required off-street parking
shall not be reduced in area or changed to any other use unless the
permitted or permissible use that it serves is discontinued or modified, or
equivalent required off-street parking is provided meeting the
requirements of this LDC.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
SECTION FOUR: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY
In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other Ordinance of Collier County
or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this
Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such
portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding
Section not affect the validity of the remaining portion.
SECTION FIVE:
INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT
CODE
The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Land
Development Code of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be
renumbered or re-Iettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be
changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word.
SECTION SIX:
EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of
State, Tallahassee, Florida.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County, Florida, this 26th Day of February, 2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHi E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
- -. "
. . . . -. .
BY:..~ ~~O.G.
~\tt &. II ... (it t ~erk
, ......../.1..
Appr ad t arm and
legal uf c
By:
TO
,Or"~
Page 6 of 6
Words Gtruok through are deleted, words underlined are added
SA
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the
Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do
hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct
copy of:
ORDINANCE 2008-12
Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners
on the 26th day of February, 2008, during Regular Session.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of
County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 5th
day of March, 2008.
DWIGHT E. BROCK
Clerk of Courts and .~lefk
Ex-officio to Board of
County Commission~rs
~
~D.C.
By: Ann Jennejohn,
Deputy Clerk
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING S\.IlC 8
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO' -7
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the lioard Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to he lorwarded to the Board Oflicc only after the l30ard has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate fllf additional signatures, dales. and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
exception of the Chairman's sie:naturc, draw a line throue:h routine: lines ill throue:h #4, comolete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routing order)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder orthe original d(lCUmcnt pending Bee approvaL Normall:y the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the cxecutive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the cvent one nl"the addressecs above, including Sue Filson, need to contact stall j(lr additional or missing
information. All original documents nceding the Bee Chairman's signature are to he delivered to the BCC oniee only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.)
Name of Primary Staff Kay Nell, CLA Phone Number Extension B400
Contact Collier County Attorney's Office
Agenda Date Item was February 26. 2008 Agenda Item Number 9B
Approved by the BCC
Type of Document Resolution 2008-47 N umber of Original I
Attached Documents Attached
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a fO riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Otficials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Otfice and all other arties exec t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the
document or the final ne Jotiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs arc placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si lI1ature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided (0 Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approyaL
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullined. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on (enter date) and all changes
made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The
Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable.
Yes
(Initial)
N/A(Not
A licable)
2.
3.
4,
5,
6,
r(jy
N/A
~
(Q{;
(~
I: Forms/ County Forms/ Bee Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04. Revised] .26.05. Revised 2.24.05
~9B
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-47
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO APPOINT ROBERT A.
PENDERGRASS TO THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION
BOARD.
WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 2002-27, as amended, established the
Pelican Bay Services Division Board and provides that the Board shall consist of nine (9)
members with a residential interest within the Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit
("Unit"), and two (2) members with commercial/business or other interests within the
Unit who are residents of Collier County; and
WHEREAS, members of the Pelican Bay Service Division Board are selected by
ballot from the residents of the Unit; and
WHEREAS, there is currently a vacancy on this Board for a member with residential
interest; and
WHEREAS, Robert A. Pendergrass, resident, was elected as the next qualified
candidate to serve on the Pelican Bay Service Division Board pursuant to the ballot
results of March 6, 2007.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that Robert A. Pendergrass,
resident, is hereby appointed to the Pelican Bay Services Division Board to fulfill the
remainder of the vacant term, said term to expire on March 31, 2010.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and unanimous vote.
DATED: February 26, 2008
J
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
~,:Lb-
TOM HENNING, Chairman
AlTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
~.)
BY:~ ~(Y""
'Attel~ IS to' ty Clerk
........' .l~
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
w
ounty Attorney
Ilem# ~
p,genda 1/2tfl....~
Date
11a1~ 1/2-1-0 ~
Reed
['Q .A-'U ) t)..-".
Deputy Clerk (;
CP:08-BCC-00410
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLlfl D
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 7
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Oftice only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures. dates. and/or infonnation needed. If the document is already complete with the
exceotion of the Chairman's signature, draw a line through routing lines #1 through #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routine order)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONT ACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending BCe approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to he delivered to the BCC office only after the BCC has acted to approve the
item.)
Name of Primary Staff Kay Nell, CLA Phone Number Extension 8400
Contact Collier County Attomev's Office
Agenda Date Item was February 26,2008 Agenda Item Number 9D
Approved by the BCC
Type of Document Resolution 2008-48 Number of Original I
Attached Documents Attached
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ra riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office ofthe County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from m
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC V
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and thc Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si rnature and initials are re uired.
ln most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadtines!
The document was approved by the BCC on (enter date) and all changes
made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The
Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable.
1.
2,
3.
4.
5,
6.
N/A(Not
A licable)
N/A
I: Forms/ County Forms/ BCC Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
9D
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-48
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO REAPPOINT MEMBERS TO
THE RADIO ROAD BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 97-52 created and established the Radio
Road Beautification Advisory Committee and provides that the Committee shall be
composed of five (5) members; and
WHEREAS, the terms of two (2) members will expire on March 3, 2008, creating
vacancies on this Committee; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners previously provided public notice
soliciting applications from interested parties; and
WHEREAS, the Committee has provided the Board of County Commissioners with
its recommendations for appointment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. Dale L. Lewis is hereby reappointed to the Radio Road Beautification Advisory
Committee for a 4 year term, said term to commence March 3, 2008, and to expire on
March 3, 2012.
2. Betty R. Schudel is hereby appointed to the Radio Road Beautification Advisory
for a 4 year term, said term to commence March 3, 2008, and to expire on March 3,
2012.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County hereby waives the provisions of Section Seven B. of Ordinance No. 2001-55, as
amended, relating to a limitation of two consecutive terms of office, for the purpose of
reappointment of Dale L. Lewis to this Committee.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote.
DATED: February 26, 2008
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
By: l\.111 " .. =,' ~fl.C
Attis\ u to ,Clerk
119Ntw't ..l~' .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
:,7k_
TOM HENNING, Chairman
Item# qD
Agenda -::b--~ ",-Or
Date U- V I.V
Jeffre
Chief
~:~~d d---=~::~ !
~
Del):Jty C:e;k lJ -U ~
-..0"'_---..--.....,."'"'..,'.,_.
CP:08-BCC-00409
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 9 E
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Oftice only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
exception of the Chaimlan's signature, draw a line throue:h routine: lines #1 throue:h #4, comolete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routine: order)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder ofthc original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to he delivered to the BCe office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.)
Name of Primary Staff Kay Nell, CLA Phone Number Extension 8400
Contact Collier County Attomey's Office
Agenda Date Item was February 26, 2008 Agenda Item Number 9E
Approved by the BCC
Type of Document Resolution 2008-49 Number of Original 1
Attached Documents Attached
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney, This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State OffiCials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chainman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as thc date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiateu contract date whichever is a licable,
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCe's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines!
The document was approved by the Bee on (enter date) and all cbanges
made during tbe meeting bave been incorporated in tbe attacbed document. Tbe
Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Iicable.
Yes
(Initial)
N/A (Not
A licabte)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
@
N/A
(([;
I: Forms/ County Forms/ BCC Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
9E
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-49
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO REAPPOINT MEMBERS TO
THE BAYSHORE AVALON BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY
COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 97-82, as amended, establishing the
Bayshore Avalon Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit and creating the Bayshore
Avalon Beautification Advisory Committee, provides that the Committee shall consist of
five (5) members; and
WHEREAS, the terms of two (2) members will expire on March 3, 2008, creating
vacancies on this Committee; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners previously provided public notice
soliciting applications from interested parties; and
WHEREAS, the Bayshore Avalon Beautification Advisory Committee has provided
the Board of County Commissioners with its recommendations for appointment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF CDUNlY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNlY, FLORIDA, that:
1. Bill L. Neal, resident, is hereby reappointed to the Bayshore Avalon
Beautification Advisory Committee for a four-year term, said term to commence March
3, 2008, and expire on March 3, 2012.
2. Maurice Gutierrez, resident, is hereby reappointed to the Bayshore Avalon
Beautification Advisory Committee for a four-year term, said term to commence March
3, 2008, and expire on March 3, 2012.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County hereby waives the provisions of Section Seven B. of Ordinance No. 2001-55, as
amended, relating to a limitation of two consecutive terms of office, for the purpose of
reappointment of Bill L. Neal and Maurice Gutierrez to this Committee.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote.
DATED: February 26, 2008
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNlY COMMISSIONERS
::Ik
TOM HENNING, Chairman
~~~~~o.~.
I1CJMUrt ..1"
Appr ved as to form and
legalu I 'e c .
Item # q f"
Agenda't,zu, -0 ~ .
Date
~~~d 2,:Zq -0 f I
~lu A /~Ofr-
Deputy Clerk _,
\0 A
JALKiN9 Points
&"C-iZ,
z/21t,lo'i?-
CJ<-
History
I, Since 1982 there has been a separate table in the LDC in a separate section titled
"Supplementary District Regulations" that has specified setbacks for all types of
accessory structures for residential land uses,
2, There are also the district standards in the Estates Zoning District that in 1982 set
forth "minimum yard requirements" but did not qualify as to whether or not the
setback requirements were to apply to principal structures, accessory structures or
both,
3, My theory is that this discrepancy prompted an administrative interpretation to
apply a 10 foot rear yard setback per the setback table in the supplementary
district regulations, per discussions with staff present at that time,
4, This interpretation became more problematic in 1991 when the LDC was adopted
after the adopting of the GMP and text was added to the Zoning District
Regulations in the Estates Zoning District which clarified that the setback
standards stated in the Zoning district (vs the table) applied to accessory
structures, This theoretically "reversed" the historical 10 foot standard,
5, The interpretation of 10 feet carried on throughout all the LDC changes and was
an accepted practice to be applied by staff for over 20 years and accepted by the
public until one inquiry was made approximately 2 months ago by a citizen,
6, No evidence of written policy; not too unusual give the length oftime of the 10
foot setback application, Staff available in the audience to give verbal testimony
to the 10 foot rule application,
Points to Consider:
I, 10 foot rear yard setback has been routinely applied for over 20 years with know
known concerns until now (one concern),
2, A change now to require additional setback beyond 10 feet will create legal non-
conforming structures which is undesirable but can be remedied over time,
3, This discrepancy has been in place throughout the tenure of over two decades of
County Manager's, CDES Administrators, Planning Directors and Building
Officials, I regret to have to be the one to bring this forward to you after all this
time however it is a problem that needs to be resolved so staff can apply Board
desired setback for accessory structures,
Options:
1, Keep the 10 foot rear yard setback requirement for accessory structures associated
with residential dwellings - problem goes away; question about consistency with
GGAMP (75 feet is not expressly stated in the GMP),
2, Require the 75 foot for accessory structures per the LDC/Estates zoning district
standards - creates non-conforming structures,
3, Adopt a different standard for different periods oftime with a build back policy
subject to landscape buffering, Creates different regulations in the zoning district
which are subject to errors in application and confusion,
Numerical data in the report was not clearly stated that it was for a one square mile
sample in the Estates zoning district Staff is prepared at this time to present
additional data regarding the number of impacted properties, but please keep in mind
that lOnon-conforming structures are not any less problematic then 210 non-
conforming structures,
Please direct staff as to how you would like us to remedy the setback situation for
accessory structures, An LDC amendment will more than likely be required so until
that time it will be necessary to get the Board's guidance on what standard to apply,
~cc ---yZ
a1~oK~
JaN S" ICl8L
/J( ( "'1<-
? /2~1C'/?-<:J\
7.10 E - Estates District:
a. District Purpose: The provisions of this district
are intended to apply to an area of low density
residences in a semi-rural to rural environment,
permitting all necessary residential activities
and limited agricultural activities. The district
is designed to accommodate certain structures and
uses subject to restrictions and requirements
necessary to preserve and protect the low density
residential, semi-rural and rural environment
character of the district. It is the intent of
this district to implement the comprehensive Plan
within, but not necessarily limited to those areas
of Collier County shown as Low Density on the Land
Use Plan.
b. Uses and Structures: No building or structure, or
part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used,
or land or water used, in whole or part, for other
than the following:
1) Permitted principal Uses and Structures:
single-family dwellings.
2) Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures:
(a) Accessory uses and structures which are
incidental to and customarily associated
with the uses permitted in the district.
(b) Field crops raised for consumption of
the people residing on the land.
(c) Keeping of fowl or poultry not to exceed
twenty- fi ve (25) in total number pro-
vided such fowl or poul try are kept in
an enclosure located thrity (30) feet or
more from any lot line and at least one
hundred (100) feet from any existing
residence located in adjacent porperty.
(d) Keeping of horses and/or Ii vestock
(excluding pigs and hogs) not to exceed
two (2) per acre. Any roofed structure
fOE the shelter and feeding of such
animals shall be no less than twenty
(20) feet from any lot line or no closer
than one hundred (100) feet to any
existing residence located on adj acent
property. No open feed lot for animals
shall be permitted.
.
30.
elf-*.
iflavlDK' ~R
(e) One guest house
8.38) .
(Subject to section
3) Permitted Provisional Uses and Structures:
( a) Churches and other places of worship.
(b)
Public, private and
and colleges having
academic curriculum.
parochial schools
a conventional
(c) Recreational facilities not accessory to
principal use.
(d) Social and fraternal organizations.
(Subject to Section 8.11)
(e) Owner occupied child care centers (Sub-
ject to Section 8.48), convalescent
homes, hospices, rest homes, homes for
the aged, adult foster homes, children's
homes and rehabilitation centers.
4) Prohibi ted Uses and Structures: Any use or
structure not specifically, provisionally, or
by reasonable implication permitted herein,
or permissible by special exception.
c. Development Standards:
1 )
Minimum Lot Area:
acreS4
Two and one-quarter (2~)
2 )
Minimum Lot width:
feet.
One hundred fifty (150)
3) Minimum Yard Requirements:
(a) Front Yard:
Seventy-five
(75)
feet.
(b)
Side Yard:
Ten (10%) percent of the
width of the lot not to
exceed a maximum require-
ment of thirty (30) feet.
(c) Rear Yard:
seventy-five
(75)
feet.
4)
Maximum Height of Structures:
feet.
Thirty
(30)
5) Maximum Density: One (1) dwelling unit per
two and one-quarter (2~) acres.
.
31.
SECTION 8.
6a-F2- ./
2 jZIf/(f) -
c.t.
6~~el~stYicl
~~\I=;+1~
JaY" 5; I Q82.. 8.;;l. - ~
SUPPLEMENTARY DISTRICT REGULATIONS:
8.1 Visibility at Intersections in All Zoning Districts:
On a corner lot in all zoning districts, no fence,
wall, hedge, planting, or structure shall be erected,
planted, or allowed to grow in such a manner as to
obstruct vision between a height of three (3) feet and
eight (8) feet above the centerline grades of the
intersecting streets in the area bounded by the street
lines of such corner lots and a line joining points
along said street lines forty (40) feet from the point
of intersection. Parking is prohibited in this area.
Trees are permitted, so long as the foliage is cut away
and maintained within the three (3) and eight (8) foot
clearance requirement. Posts for illuminating fix-
tures, traffic control, and street name signs are
permitted, so long as the sign or equipment is not
within the prescribed clear space.
8.2 Location of Accessory Structures: Accessory structures
must be constructed simultaneously with or following
the construction of the principal structure and shall
conform with the following setbacks and building separ-
ations:
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Non-Waterfront Lots - NonGolf Course Lots
FRONT
STRUCTURE
TO STRUCTURE
(If detached)
REAR
SIDE
L
Parking Garage or
Carport - Single Family
10'
SPS
10'
SPS
2.
I-Story Parking
Structures
10'
SPS
35'
SPS
3.
Multi-Story Parking
Structures
*1/1
SPS
35'
SPS
4.
Swimming Pool and/or
Screen Enclosure
(One and two family)
N
SPS
10'
SPS
5.
Swimming Pool
(Multiple family and
Commercial)
N
SPS
20'
15'
6.
Tennis Courts (Private)
(One and two family)
10'
SPS
15'
SPS
.
ll3.
7.
REV. 9
7.
Tennis Courts (Multiple
family and Commercial)
8.
Utility Buildings
9.
Chickee,
Barbecue Areas
10. Attached Screen Porch
11. Unlisted Accessory
12. Satellite Dish Antenna
N = None
N/A = Not Applicable
NP=Structure allowed in rear of
building only. *
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
NP
20'
10'
10'
10'
SPS
15'
15'
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
~~-~
lJW)Oe {{{
20'
10'
N
.
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
On Waterfront Lots and Golf Course Lota
1.
Parking Garage or
Carport - Single Family
2.
I-Story Parking
Structures
3.
Multi-Story Parking
Structures'
4.
Swimming Pool and/or
Screen Enclosure
(One and two family)
5.
Swimming Pool
(Multiple family and
Commercial)
6.
Tennis Courts (Private)
(One and two family)
Tennis Courts (Multiple
family and Commercial)
.
N/A
10'
10'*
SPS = Calculated same as
principal structure.
*1/1 = l/foot of accessory
height = l/foot of
building separation.
FRONT
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
114.
STRUCTURE
REAR** SIDE TO STRUCTURE
(If detached)
SPS
SPS
SPS
10'
20'
15'
35'
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
15 '
SPS
SPS
10'
10'
*1/1
N
N
10'
20'
REV. 9
** In those cases where the Coastal Control Line is involved,
the Coastal Control Line will apply.
114.1
.
e;t-l..
1-f2t4~~
8.3 Exclusions from Height Limits: The height limitations con-
tained in the Schedule of District Regulations do not apply
to spires, belfries, cupolas, flagpoles, antennas, water tanks,
fire towers when operated by a branch of government, ventila-
tors, chimneys, feed storage structures, silos, windmills, or
to other appurtenances usually required to be placed above the
roof level and not intended for human occupancy, or to airport
control towers; provided, however, the heights of these struc-
tures or appurtenances thereto shall not exceed any height
limitations prescribed by the Federal Aviation Agency or
airport zoning regulations within the flight approach zone of
airports. (See Section 9.9).
8.4 Exclusions from Height Limits - Off-Street Parking Within a
Building. In instances where off-street parking is provided
within the primary building, the Zoning Director may waive the
maximum height requirements to the extent necessary to permit
off-street parking within the primary building, provided the
number of off-street parking spaces required by this ordinance
for the use involved may not be reduced, nor may the waiver in
height be greater than that necessary to provide for the
off-street parking within the primary building, with a maximum
of two (2) parking levels. This exclusion shall not apply to
those districts where provisions are made in the Height Limits
for under-building parking.
8.5 Exceptiona to Required Yarda. In all zone districts, yards as
defined in Section 20 shall be as established by the Schedule
of District Regulations except as follows:
115.
10 GiC..
MEMORANDUM
Date:
March 3, 2008
To:
Phil Gramatges, Sr. Project Manager
PUED
From:
Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Resolution 2008-53
Amending Resolution 2007-257
Please find one copy of the Resolution (Agenda Item #10G), as
referenced above, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners
on Wednesday, February 27, 2008.
If you should have any questions, please call me at 252-8406.
Thank you.
Enclosure
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLJ 0 G
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to oJiginal document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
exceotion of the Chairman's sienature, draw a line throuo-h routine: lines #1 throue:h #4, comolete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routinl!' orderl
I. Tom Henning Board of County Commissioners
2. -
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Nonnally lhe primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact infonnation is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the BCC Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the BCe office only after the BCe has acted to approve the
item.)
Name of Primary Staff Porfirio E. Gramatges Phone Number 252-8836
Contact -
Agenda Date Item was February p6, 2008 ~o..f> I v--- Agenda Item Number lOG
Aooroved bv the BCC ,).7
Type of Document Resolution Number of Originat t
Attached Documents Attached
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes cotumn or mark "N/ A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a fO nate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other parties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
signature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception),_,~riginal document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 2/26/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a lieable.
Yes
(Initial)
N/A (Not
A licable)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
r
N/A
N/A
--
I: Forms/ County Forms/ BCe forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
lOG
RESOLUTION NO. 08- 53
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE COLLIER COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FEE
SCHEDULE TO ADD A FEE FOR HYDRAULIC MODELING AND
ANALYSIS NECESSARY TO ENSURE CONCURRENCY FOR WATER
AND WASTEWATER SERVICES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, on December 11, 2007, the Board of County Commissioners ("Board")
approved Resolution No. 2007-357, establishing a fee schedule for services performed or collected
by Collier County's Community Development and Environmental Services Division identified as
Attachment B to Resolution No. 2007-357; and
WHEREAS, the Board recognizes that an addition to the fee schedule is necessary to reflect
the actual cost incurred by the County for hydraulic modeling and analysis necessary to ensure
concurrency for water and wastewater services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1) The Board declares that the additional fee is fair and reasonable to those who will
receive the benefit of services, reviews, and inspections, required pursuant to the Land
Development Code and the County's corresponding development review and permitting processes.
2) The fee schedule indentified as Attachment B to Resolution No. 2007-357 is
amended to add Paragraph F. 7. d. as follows:
F) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7) Utility Plan Review & Inspection Fees-
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
d. Utility Modeling and Analvsis fee (for all DRI's and PUD's) $ 1000 at time ofSDP, SIP.
and PPL application for all developments within the geographic boundaries of the Collier County
Water-Sewer District.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board
with an immediate effective date upon the Board of County Commissioner's approval, and that
Resolution No. 2007-357 is amended as stated above.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote, this 27th day of February,
2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
.' U'.,".
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
I 9lllturt
Approyal as to form and legal
Sufficiency:
Item# lOG
~;~;da a.- o.l-o~
Jenmfer A. Belpe io
Assistant County Attorney
Det~ 01- oa-o Q
Recd a
1 taYTtf-1 OA- Sl,{tf(\;fk'd
Cttr+~-b
loft ~ t.R
i.ifiill"~~.iifili'ii"; I i - ! . -I ..".... - t ~
ilftIJriIIIIJfJ;!II,iil ~ 1 i 1 ~mn! r ~
II
IIi1 iilj hi111hJ llj Iii . I I I umUI
.1 r I I, II I I ~ I
i 111 Ii] II iilJflunmi I i I HlHlfl
i:1 If.1 I ,. ~. ;illl . I n fHfHll
1:111 litl ~i II l..}t ! I I I
ltililri!i Ii i fil!~ . I mm
.
11 Ill;!; >'{ ~. HI .
I II', · I I i
Iii Wlj! II i i In q 0 ,................. ..
... Q.... ..,Qot I
J1J1J1J1I1I1':'
..........."
1iI..........,~
HHOr
! I Uh I · I' I' H~~H.
II to II i'. IIIIUI
'If[l t .. II
')1 i If.. i .. ~ I
'I Ii Ij " I I ; I >, I ..................z I
ill fIll! fJ ~ ~ it
II · In ! I !. .' I ' I' mrml
!I' i · i ,. " . ,
j · II. ~ r, : , mlm
, "
hi 1 c ~ 1 I ! , mml
.. ~ <i II
I :li;l ~ i. ! ,
, HUH,
hill I P f t 11I11I,
~H II j i mm
'r . ,
J
"11 '
:;fi lQ]J
:~, ~
j@
. 9
W
@
~
="
. @
21
~
I' ~ n..
iiHhll!~1I
H~ih '
!
.~'-~---'.-'--l
\<yA..C,Q. ,
u
CD
U
U
I '
~CD
~U
~~
::0
~O
~'
n
CD
~
c I
CD
~
fi W
="
,~
.
1\QJ
i
~
9
@
@8
~;!J11 all
~ IjJ"'I~
m;;i <fi
\ 011./. ffi
u
CD
U
U
I ...
~CD
~'U
~~
::0
~O
~'
n
CD
~
c I
CD
~
'i
f
i
;
,
j
~
I' ~ ijI
I,'ihh III II
WUi
", !
u
CD
U
U
I '
()CD
g,u
ai'
c;
~~
::0
~O
~'
n
CD
~
c I
CD
~
fi (0) ~
16 @ ~
,~~ r=:==IO
,. @ @8
1 @ F::>
"@WJ
~
@8
.
I.,: all
i If I
@2)'.H=hln.
P!Ui
,h !
\oA/L~
u
CD
U
U
I '
~CD
;U
~~
::0
~O
~'
t?
~
C I
CD
~
l2B
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. OrigitHlI documents should be hand de1ivcTI:d 10 the RO<lrd Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only aftl'f the l30ard has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriutc for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed, frthe document is already complete with the
exec lion of the Chairman's si nature, draw a line l:hrou h routin lines # I thrau h #4, com Jete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routin order)
1.
2.
3.
4.
PRIMARY CONT ACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item)
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
Name of Primary Staff Scott R. Teach Phone Number X8400
Contact
Agenda Date ttem was 2/26/08 Agenda Item Number ,~ /;;2.6
Annroved bv the BCC
Type of Document Retention Agreement Number of Original I
Attached Documents Attached
6. Minutes and Records
Clerk of Court's Office
Yes
(Initial)
N/A (Not
A licable)
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on d .Cllo-()S (enter date) and all changes
made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The
Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable.
\)DA
NIR
'DDf\
DDA
D00
uDf1
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
I: Forms! County Forms! Bee Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
MEMORANDUM
Date:
March 7, 2008
To:
Scott Teach
Assistant County Attorney
From:
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Retention Agreement with Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A.
Attached please find one (1) copy, referenced above (Agenda Item 12B),
adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February
27, 2008.
The original agreement will be held in the Minutes & Records
Department as part of the Board's permanent record.
If you should have any questions, please contact me 252-8411.
Thank you.
128
":.'1
, i--.:' ';"" J-..
! f _~.. ; I \~L. U( i ;:-'(~:-
: ,\ il)NTY ATTORNEr
RETENTION AGREEMENT WITII{aD3 MAR - 5
ALLEN. NORTON & BLUE. P.A.
1''' I, 4 (1
II ,. lw
This Retention Agreement is made by and between the Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County, Florida (the "County"), and the law firm of Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A., of
Tampa, Florida ("Allen, Norton").
Whereas, Allen, Norton has special expertise and resources in a wide range oflegal
matters, with particular expertise in labor and employment related matters; and
Whereas, the County from time to time has a requirement and need for legal services
which are particularly within the expertise of Allen, Norton;
Now, Therefore, in consideration of the premises contained herein, the County hereby
hires and retains Allen, Norton and Allen, Norton hereby agrees to provide legal services to
County.
ARTICLE 1
COMPENSATION; METHOD OF PAYMENT
1.1 Compensation shall be paid to Allen, Norton in accordance with the terms set forth in
Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Requirements for reimbursable
expenses are set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Expenses
other than automobile expenses must be documented by copies of paid receipts or other
evidence of payment. The Certificate contained in Exhibit C must be included with every
invoice submitted for payment.
1.2 The rates set forth in Exhibit A shall remain in effect without change for a minimum of
two (2 years) from the effective date of this Agreement. In the third, fourth and fifth
years of the Agreement, upon the request of Allen, Norton, the County Attorney is
Page 1 of 17
128
128
authorized to negotiate to increase the hourly rate up to a maximum often (10) percent
without approval by the Board of County Commissioners. In the negotiation process,
Allen, Norton must substantiate the reason the request is being made (i.e. market
conditions, increase in CPI, etc.)
1.3 Multiple Attorney Assignments.
The County acknowledges that, from time to time, it may be advisable for Allen, Norton
to assign more than one attorney to a project or case. Nevertheless, in order to ensure
that such multiple attorney assignments are efficient and cost-effective for the County,
Allen, Norton agrees to the following procedures and billing limitations for multiple
attorney assignments.
1.3.1 A primary attorney will be identified for such projects or cases and that
attorney will be the sole contact attorney for the County, except in the case of
an emergency or the County's written pre-approval. In practice, this means
that generally only the primary attorney will meet or communicate directly
with County personnel or attend meetings, court, arbitrations, mediations or
other proceedings on behalf of the County.
1.3.2 Attorneys assigned to a project or case other than the primary attorney will be
less senior attorneys with lower billing rates unless the additional attorney(s)
has/have a demonstrated expertise that will demonstrably enhance the value
and efficiency of the legal services being provided to the County.
1.3.3 Allen, Norton agrees that internal or in-house conferences among multiple
attorneys assigned to a project or case shall be kept to the absolute minimum
necessary for the provision of the legal services in question. To the extent
Page 2 of 17
128
internal or in-house conferences among multiple attorneys assigned to a project
or case are necessary, each such attorney may bill at his or her customary rate
for up to thirty (30) minutes for any such conference. To the extent such a
conference exceeds thirty (30) minutes in length, Allen, Norton agrees that it
will discount the total billings for all attorneys involved in the conference by
forty-five (45) percent.
1.4 Allen, Norton may submit invoices for hourly work assignments pursuant to Exhibit A
only after the services for which the invoices are submitted have been completed or
expenses incurred. An original invoice plus one copy is due within fifteen (15) days of
the end of the month, except the final invoice which must be received no later than sixty
(60) days after the work is completed or the expiration oftms Agreement.
1.5 To be deemed proper, all invoices must comply with the requirements set forth in this
Agreement and must be submitted on the form and pursuant to the instruction prescribed
by County. Payment may be withheld for failure of Allen, Norton to comply with a term,
condition, or requirement of this Agreement.
1.6 Payment shall be made to Allen, Norton at:
Allen, Norton, & Blue, P.A.
324 South Hyde Park Avenue
Suite 350
Tampa, Florida 33606
ARTICLE 2
INSURANCE
2.1 In order to insure the indemnification obligation contained above, Allen, Norton shall as
a minimum, provide, pay for, and maintain in force at all times during the term of this
Page 3 of 17
128
Agreement, professional liability insurance in an amount not less than Three Million
Dollars ($3,000,000.00) Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limits. If any liability
insurance obtained by Allen, Norton to comply with the insurance requirements
contained herein is issued on a "claims made" form as opposed to an "occurrence" form,
the retroactive date for coverage shall be no later than the commencement date of the
assigned work to which this Agreement applies, and such insurance shall provide, in the
event of cancellation or non-renewal, that the discovery period for insurance claims (tail
coverage) shall not be less than three years following the completion of the assigned
work and acceptance by the County.
2.2 Such policy or policies shall be issued by United States Treasury approved companies
authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and having agents upon whom service of
process may be made in Collier County, Florida.
2.3 Allen, Norton shall furnish to the Risk Management Director Certificates ofInsurance or
endorsements evidencing the insurance coverages specified by this Article prior to
beginning performance of work under this Agreement.
ARTICLE 3
TERM AND TIME OF PERFORMANCE
3.1 The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of three years to begin February 26,
2008 and to end on February 26, 2011, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the
provisions of this Agreement. Absent notice of intent to terminate, the Agreement may
be renewed upon mutual consent of the parties for two (2) additional terms of one (1)
year each. (In the event the term of this Agreement extends beyond a single fiscal year
Page 4 of 17
128
of County, the continuation of this Agreement beyond the end of any fiscal year shall be
subject to the availability of funds from County in accordance with Chapter 129, Florida
Statutes. )
3.2 Time shall be deemed to be ofthe essence in performing the duties, obligations and
responsibilities by this Agreement.
3.3 Any amendments, alterations, variations, modifications or waivers of provisions of this
Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing, duly signed by
both parties hereto, and attached to the original of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 4
TERMINATION
4.1 This Agreement may be terminated by either party for cause upon ten (10) days' notice or
by the County for convenience upon no less than thirty (30) days' advance written notice
in accordance with the "NOTICES" section of this Agreement.
4.2 Termination of this Agreement for cause shall include, but not be limited to, failure to
suitably perform the work, failure to continuously perform the work in a manner
calculated to meet or accomplish the objectives of County as set forth in this Agreement,
or multiple breach of the provisions ofthis Agreement notwithstanding whether any such
breach was previously waived or cured.
4.3 In the event this Agreement is terminated for convenience, Allen, Norton shall be paid for
any services performed to the date the Agreement is terminated; however, upon being
notified of County's election to terminate, Allen, Norton shall refrain from performing
further services or incurring additional expenses under the term of this Agreement.
Allen, Norton acknowledges and agrees that Ten Dollars ($10) of the compensation to be
Page 5 of 17
128
paid by County, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged by Allen, Norton, is
given as specific consideration to Allen, Norton for County's right to terminate this
Agreement for convenience. Allen, Norton's obligations to the County as provided for
hereunder shall cease upon termination, except for participating in an orderly and
professional transfer of such responsibilities and files or copies of files to the County or
its designee.
ARTICLE 5
RECORD AUDIT AND INSPECTION
5.1 County shall have the right to audit the books and records of Allen, Norton pertinent to
the funding under this Agreement. Allen, Norton shall preserve and make available, at
reasonable times for examination and audit by County, all financial records, supporting
documents, and other documents pertinent to this Agreement for a period of three (3)
years after termination of this Agreement or, if any audit has been initiated and audit
findings have not been resolved at the end of the three years, the books and records shall
be retained until resolution ofthe audit findings.
5.2 If the Florida Public Records Act (Chapter 119, Fla. Stat.) is determined by County to be
applicable to Allen, Norton's records, Allen, Norton shall comply with all requirements
thereof, however, no confidentiality or non-disclosure requirement of either federal or
state law shall be violated by Allen, Norton.
ARTICLE 6
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
6.1 Allen, Norton states that it is familiar with and will comply with the terms and conditions
of Chapter 112, Part III, Florida Statutes (Code of Ethics).
Page 6 of 17
128
6.2 It is important that Allen, Norton be independent and impartial in order to properly
conduct its services to the County. Allen, Norton shall not act as counsel in any lawsuit
or other adversary proceeding in which County is named as an adversary party or in
which Allen, Norton takes an adverse position to the County.
6.3 Neither Allen, Norton nor its employees shall have or hold any continuing or frequently
recurring employment or contractual relationship that is substantially antagonistic or
incompatible with Allen, Norton's loyal and conscientious exercise of judgment related
to its performance under this Agreement.
6.4 In the event Allen, Norton is permitted to utilize subcontractors, herein, to perform any
services required by this Agreement, Allen, Norton agrees to prohibit such
subcontractors, by written contract, from having any conflicts as within the meaning of
this section.
6.5 If at any time Allen, Norton's firm represents a client in matters having to do with the
Collier County government, be it before the Board of County Commissioners or any
other agency or division of Collier County government, Allen, Norton will contact the
County Attorney's Office before undertaking such representation so that it can be
determined whether a conflict of interest exists.
ARTICLE 7
INDEMNIFICATION
7.1 Allen, Norton acknowledges and agrees that Ten Dollars ($10.00) of the compensation to
be paid by County, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged by Allen, Norton, is
given as specific consideration to Allen, Norton so that Allen, Norton shall at all times
hereafter indemnify, hold harmless and, at County's option, defend or pay for an attorney
Page 7 of 17
128
selected by County to defend County, its officers, agents, servants, and employees against
any and all claims, losses, liabilities, and expenditures of any kind, including attorney
fees, court costs, and expenses, caused by negligent act or omission of Allen, Norton, its
employees, agents, servants, or officers, or accruing, resulting from, or related to the
subject matter of this Agreement including, without limitation, any and all claims,
demands or causes of action of any nature whatsoever resulting from injuries or damages
sustained by any person or property. The provisions of this section shall survive the
expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. To the extent considered necessary
by County, any sums due Allen, Norton under this Agreement may be retained by County
until all of County's claims for indemnification pursuant to this Agreement have been
settled or otherwise resolved; and any amount withheld shall not be subject to payment of
interest by County.
ARTICLE 8
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
8.1 Any and all reports, photographs, surveys, and other data and documents provided or
created in connection with this Agreement are and shall remain the property of County.
In the event oftermination ofthis Agreement, any reports, photographs, surveys, and
other data and documents prepared by Allen, Norton, whether finished or unfinished,
shall become the property of County and shall be delivered by Allen, Norton to the
County within seven (7) days oftermination ofthis Agreement by either party. Any
compensation due to Allen, Norton shall be withheld until all documents are received as
provided herein.
Page 8 of 17
128
ARTICLE 9
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
9.1 Allen, Norton is an independent contractor under this Agreement. Services provided by
Allen, Norton shall be subject to the supervision of Allen, Norton, and such services shall
not be provided by Allen, Norton as officers, employees, or agents of the County. The
parties expressly acknowledge that it is not their intent to create any rights or obligations
in any third person or entity under this Agreement.
ARTICLE 10
NONDISCRIMINATION, EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
AND AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
10.1 Allen, Norton shall not unlawfully discriminate against any person in its operations and
activities in its use or expenditure ofthe funds or any portion of the funds provided by
this Agreement and shall affirmatively comply with all applicable provisions of the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in the course of providing any services funded in
whole or in part by County, including Titles I and II of the ADA (regarding
nondiscrimination on the basis of disability), and all applicable regulations, guidelines,
and standards.
10.2 Allen, Norton's decisions regarding the delivery of services under this Agreement shall
be made without regard to or consideration of race, age, religion, color, gender, sexual
orientation national origin, martial status, physical or mental disability, political
affiliation, or any other factor which cannot be lawfully or appropriately used as a basis
for service delivery.
Page 9 of 17
128
10.3 Allen, Norton shall comply with Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act regarding
nondiscrimination on the basis of disability in employment and further shall not
discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, age,
religion, color, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, marital status, political
affiliation, or physical or mental disability. In addition, Allen, Norton shall take
affirmative steps to ensure nondiscrimination in employment against disabled persons.
Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading,
demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff, termination, rates of
pay, other forms of compensation, terms and conditions of employment, training
(including apprenticeship), and accessibility.
10.4 Allen, Norton shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and
employees are treated without regard to race, age, religion, color, gender, sexual
orientation, national origin, marital status, political affiliation, or physical or mental
disability during employment. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the
following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment
advertising, layoff, termination, rates of pay, other forms of compensation, terms and
conditions of employment, training (including apprenticeship), and accessibility.
10.5 Allen, Norton shall not engage in or commit any discriminatory practice in performing
the Scope of Services or any part of Scope of Services of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 11
NOTICES
11.1 Whenever either party desires to give notice to the other, such notice must be in writing,
sent by registered or certified United States Mail, postage prepaid, return receipt
Page 10 of 17
128
requested, or by hand-delivery, addressed to the party for whom it is intended at the place
last specified. The place for giving notice shall remain the same as set forth herein until
changed in writing in the manner provided in this section. For the present, the parties
designate the following:
FOR COLLIER COUNTY:
County Attorney
Government Center
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, Florida 34112
FOR ALLEN, NORTON:
Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A.
324 South Hyde Park Avenue
Suite 350
Tampa, Florida 33606
ARTICLE 12
MISCELLANEOUS
8.1 WAIVER OF BREACH AND MATERIALITY
Failure by County to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a
waiver of the provision or modification of this Agreement. A waiver of any breach of a
provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach and
shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms ofthis Agreement.
8.1 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
Allen, Norton shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws, codes, ordinances,
rules, and regulations in performing its duties, responsibilities, and obligations related to
this Agreement.
Page 11 of 17
128
12.3 SEVERANCE
In the event a portion of this Agreement is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to
be invalid, the remaining provisions shall continue to be effective unless County and
Allen, Norton elect to terminate this Agreement. The election to terminate this
Agreement based upon this provision shall be made within seven (7) days after the
finding by the court becomes final.
12.4 APPLICABLE LAW AND VENUE
This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with and governed by
the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for litigation concerning this Agreement shall be
in Collier County, Florida.
12.5 PRIOR AGREEMENTS
This document supercedes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations,
agreements, and understandings applicable to the matters contained herein and the parties
agree that there are no commitments, agreements or understandings concerning the
subject matter ofthis Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly,
the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any
prior representations or agreements, whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no
modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall
be effective unless contained in a written document in accordance with Article 3 above.
12.6 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
The truth and accuracy of each "Whereas" clause set forth above is acknowledged by the
parties. The attached Exhibits A, B, and C are incorporated into and made a part of this
Agreement.
Page 120f17
""-.,
D~E!!":~~~o'8
~~__,:'(\ --,' J>, _ :..':'..~~"-,.
"T""l>S"'; -, '. "'. ;
;-:M.' ~~".',l'. ',~ '. l;"':
::owiG' E.IlROCk, CLERK
1- "',.-', ""-, '"I . ""'C .
"',' '; I.' -$')'" ;' \M': L..
'\.., 3''''1 oc,
,
~,~ to o.~.... .
'IWI'lllt.... _h.
Approved as to form and
Ie suffi enc
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
~iu .
By' ~
. TO lNG, HAIRM~
S tt R. each
Managing Assistant County Attorney
ALLEN, NORTON, & BLUE, PA
DATE:
Bi~/~/~~
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing Retention Agreement was acknowledged before me this;l.'/3"<<day of
r::E-Bf!-u-f\l2.y ,2008, by MALI< LFV,rr-
as <v.JAkl-fOI-{)=/l. of Allen, Norton & Blue,
P.A., a Florida Professional Association, on behalf of the professional association.@he is
Grso?ally kn~o me or produced as identification.
~~~".^~
Signature of ot Pubhc
~1Yl0FP~ (YJAY.:'Or-J
Name of Notary Pu ic typed, printed or
My Commission Expires:
Q) KIMBERLY MAXSON
"'i CommIssion DO 698670
, ExpIres September 2, 2011
n BondlldThluT~F.......1OOo8I5-70111
Page 13 ofl7
J2p
128
EXHIBIT A
For professional services rendered, Allen, Norton's fee shall be based on the hourly rate as
follows:
$220.00 per hour for services provided by principals and associates
$ 95.00 per hour for services provided by law clerks & paralegals.
Allen, Norton's fee shall not exceed $100,000.00 per Purchase Order without the approval of the
Board of County Commissioners. (Where appropriate a "not to exceed" sum shall be agreed to
when each assignment is made to Allen, Norton.)
In the event that Allen, Norton is required or requested to perform any additional or
extraordinary services not herein contemplated, Allen, Norton shall be entitled to apply for
additional compensation, the amount of which shall be subject to the approval of County and no
such additional compensation in excess of the amount herein stated shall be paid unless
specifically authorized in advance in writing by County in its sole discretion.
Allen, Norton shall provide, at no cost to County, the annual response to County's auditors
regarding pending or threatened litigation. The auditors typically request information regarding
all litigation, claims and assessments considered to be material. The response should include the
nature of the litigation, the progress of the case to date, an estimate of the amount or range of
potential loss, and any other information considered necessary to explain the case. Allen,
Norton shall provide said response within 30 days of receipt of the request.
NOTES:
. Divisions, or departments within such divisions, shall be responsible and pay for legal
counsel services relating to litigation and outside counsel specifically for cases, matters
or issues relating to such division or department, as determined by the County Attorney
in coordination with the County Manager.
Page 14 of 17
128
EXHIBIT B
1. In addition to the charges for professional fees set forth in Exhibit A, and the
Schedules attached hereto, County shall reimburse Allen, Norton for out-of-pocket
expenses reasonably incurred in the course of rendering such legal services, including
costs of long distance calls, printing, costs of reproduction, and necessary travel
expenses (with lodging expenses no greater than $150.00 per night) incurred in
accordance with the requirements of Chapter 112, F.S. Allen, Norton shall not charge
for travel of attorneys between its offices so that it can provide the best available and
most appropriate lawyer in any of its office locations for the issues involved.
2. Allen, Norton shall submit invoices on a monthly basis for the payment of out-of-
pocket expenses. Each invoice shall include a signed certificate listing all costs,
expenses, vouchers, invoices and other documentary evidence that will describe in
reasonable detail the basis for expenditures for which reimbursement is sought as set
forth below.
3. REOUIREMENTS
The following represents Collier County's payment requirements for legal costs
}- Your federal employee identification number must be on all invoices submitted.
}- The applicable Purchase Order number must be on all invoices submitted.
}- No service, interest, or other charge oflike nature is to be imposed with regard to
any item, invoice, or request. All firms doing business with Collier County must
have a current W-9 "Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and
Certification" on file.
}- Services rendered must be specifically and concisely identified, as well as the
bond issue or financing transaction for which the services were rendered.
}- Names of persons performing services, hourly rates, and dates must be listed. The
County agrees to reimburse Allen, Norton for retention and utilization of
sub-consultants.
Page 15 of 17
12n
>- Reimbursable expense must be verified by attached receipts or copies thereof.
>- Claims for mileage and meals cannot exceed statutory allowance as provided for
under Chapter 112, F.S. Meals and mileage cannot be charged unless the
professional has traveled outside the county of the principal business location.
>- Claims for lodging at single rate (actual cost) must be substantiated by paid bill or
charge, with a cap of no more than $150.00 per night.
>- Car rentals required for travel should include compact or standard-size vehicles
only.
>- Common carrier travel shall be reimbursable at tourist or coach class fares only.
>- Accounting Division requires original receipts, or copies ofreceipts which have
been individually certified to be true copies of the originals. In addition the
Certificate contained in Exhibit C must accompany each invoice. The certifying
person must sign the Certification form and a description provided of the items,
which are certified.
>- Faxes shall not be reimbursed
>- Legal Research costs (Lexis-Nexis, Westlaw, etc.) shall not be reimbursed.
Page 16 of 17
128
EXHIBIT C
CERTIFICATE
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that:
1. has been duly designated as special counsel to
render legal services or provider of services for or on behalf of Collier County;
2. Each of the documents hereinafter identified and attached is a true and correct copy of the
original record;
3. Expenditure(s) enumerated represent costs necessarily incurred during the course of
official business for which payment has not been received and for which documentation is
not available or reasonably retrievable;
4. Claims are in compliance with the applicable statutes and administrative orders, and with
the express provision that all other parties are barred from entitlement to any part of these
costs.
RE:
Invoice No.
, Dated
Period Covered:
, Amount
IN-HOUSE CHARGES:
Photocopies:
copIes
$
Mileage:
miles
$
OTHER (Copies of invoices required):
Long Distance Calls
$
Other:
$
TOTAL:
$
FOR THE FIRM
Signed:
Print Name:
Title:
Date:
04-COA-OI1581792 rev I
Page 17 of 17
'J/ "
J ~, i1
(~ k'-'
~/
MEMORANDUM
Date:
February 21, 2008
To:
Brenda Brilhart, Purchasing Agent
Purchasing Department
From:
Ann Jennejohn, Sr. Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Contract #08-4197: "Nuisance Abatement Services"
Contractor: Ecosystems Technology
Attached please find the original contract document, as referenced
above, (Agenda Item #16A6) approved by the Board of County
Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008.
The Minutes & Records Department has also retained an original copy
which will be kept as part of the Board's permanent record.
If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-7240.
Thank you.
Attachments
ITEM NO.: 0t'. VUrDO~l8'
.::'.{~,L ;~:t." \ >:":.t~,
I '...:::'1- t'i'-Ti""\C~,l~.\,
,," '11.1 \" ," \ I' " 11",
\ ~' "~, I : \ '...-"
DATE RECEiVED:
16A
6~
"."'J'.~ >"
" ',: \. (
\ ':' ;',r!; -~
FILE NO.:
ROUTED TO:
DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS LINE
REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES
Date:
March 14,2008
To:
Robert Zachary
Assistant County Attorney
From:
Brenda Brilhart
Purchasing Agent
239-252-8446
Re:
Contract #08-4197 Nuisance Abatement Services
Contractor: Ecosystems Technology
BACKGROUND OF REQUEST:
This contract was approved by the BCC on February 26, 2008; Agenda Item
16.A.6
This item has not been previously submitted.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Contract review and approval.
OTHER COMMENTS:
Please forward to BCC for signature after approval. Ifthere are any questions
concerning the docwnent, please contact me. Purchasing would appreciate
notification when the documents exit your office. Thank you.
3/!1If)r-tR~p- cJujeJJrr;@
C/~~
o z,"f
-;...
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jeff Walker
Risk Management Department
FROM: Brenda Brilhart
Purchasing Department
DATE: March 14,2008
RE: Review of Insurance for Contract No. 08-4197 Nuisance
Abatement Services
Contractor: Ecosystems Technology, Inc.
16A
6~
This Contract was approved by the BCC on February 26, 2008;
Agenda Item16.A.6.
Please review Insurance Certificate in this Agreement for the
above-referenced contract. If everything is acceptable, please forward
to the County Attorney for further review and approval. Also will you
advise me when it has been forwarded. Thank you. If you have any
questions, please contact me at extension 8446.
~eL
7f;;11/"-
16A
6~
A G R E E MEN T 08-4197
for
Nuisance Abatement Services
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this 26th day of February, 2008, by and
between Ecosystem Technologies, Inc., authorized to do business in the State of Florida,
whose business address is 2223 McGregor Boulevard, Fort Myers, Florida 33901, hereinafter
called the "Contractor" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida,
Collier County, Naples, hereinafter called the "County":
WIT N E SSE T H:
1. COMMENCEMENT. The contract shall be for a one (1) year period, commencing on
February 26, 2008 and terminating on February 25, 2009.
The County may, at its discretion and with the consent of the Contractor, renew the
Agreement under all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement for three
(3) additional one (1) year periods. The County shall give the Contractor written notice
of the County's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior
to the end of the Agreement term then in effect.
2. STATEMENT OF WORK. The Contractor shall provide lawn services, as Primary
awardee, and invasive plant removal and additional services, as Secondary awardee, in
accordance with the terms and conditions of Bid #08-4197 and the Contractor's
proposal referred to herein and made an integral part of this agreement. This
Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties and any
modifications to this Agreement shall be mutually agreed upon in writing by the
Contractor and the County Project Manager or his designee, in compliance with the
County Purchasing Policy and Administrative Procedures in effect at the time such
services are authorized.
3. COMPENSATION. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this
Agreement the aggregate of the units actually ordered and furnished at the unit price.
Any county agency may purchase products and services under this contract, provided
sufficient funds are included in their budget(s).
Payment will be made upon receipt of a proper invoice and upon approval by the
Project Manager or his designee, and in compliance with Section 218.70, Fla. Stats.,
otherwise known as the "Florida Prompt Payment Act".
Page 1 of6
16A
6~
4. NOTICES. All notices from the County to the Contractor shall be deemed duly served
if mailed or faxed to the Contractor at the following Address:
Ecosystem Technologies, Inc.
2223 McGregor Boulevard
Fort Myers, Florida 33901
Attention: Jim Walsh, Vice President
Telephone: 239-337-5310
Facsimile: 239-337-4494
All Notices from the Contractor to the County shall be deemed duly served if mailed or
faxed to the County to:
Collier County Government Center
Purchasing Department - Purchasing Building
3301 Tamiami Trail, East
Naples, Florida 34112
Attention: Steve Carnell, PurchasingjGS Director
Telephone: 239-252-8371
Facsimile: 239-252-6584
The Contractor and the County may change the above mailing address at any time
upon giving the other party written notification. All notices under this Agreement
must be in writing.
5. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating
a partnership between the County and the Contractor or to constitute the Contractor as
an agent of the County.
6. PERMITS: LICENSES: TAXES. In compliance with Section 218.80, F.S., all permits
necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be obtained by the Contractor. Payment
for all such permits issued by the County shall be processed internally by the County.
All non-County permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be procured
and paid for by the Contractor. The Contractor shall also be solely responsible for
payment of any and all taxes levied on the Contractor. In addition, the Contractor shall
comply with all rules, regulations and laws of Collier County, the State of Florida, or the
U. S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. The Contractor agrees to comply
with all laws governing the responsibility of an employer with respect to persons
employed by the Contractor.
7. NO IMPROPER USE. The Contractor will not use, nor suffer or permit any person to
use in any manner whatsoever, county facilities for any improper, immoral or offensive
purpose, or for any purpose in violation of any federal, state, county or municipal
ordinance, rule, order or regulation, or of any governmental rule or regulation now in
Page 2 of6
16A
6~
effect or hereafter enacted or adopted. In the event of such violation by the Contractor
or if the County or its authorized representative shall deem any conduct on the part of
the Contractor to be objectionable or improper, the County shall have the right to
suspend the contract of the Contractor. Should the Contractor fail to correct any such
violation, conduct, or practice to the satisfaction of the County within twenty-four (24)
hours after receiving notice of such violation, conduct, or practice, such suspension to
continue until the violation is cured. The Contractor further agrees not to commence
operation during the suspension period until the violation has been corrected to the
satisfaction of the County.
8. TERMINATION. Should the Contractor be found to have failed to perform his
services in a manner satisfactory to the County as per this Agreement, the County may
terminate said agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this
Agreement for convenience with a thirty (30) day written notice. The County shall be
sole judge of non-performance.
9. NO DISCRIMINATION. The Contractor agrees that there shall be no discrimination as
to race, sex, color, creed or national origin.
10. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall provide insurance as follows:
A. Commercial General Liabilitv: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000
Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property
Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent
Contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability.
B. Business Auto Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $500,000 Per
Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property
Damage Liability. This shall include: Owned Vehicles, Hired and Non-Owned
Vehicles and Employee Non-Ownership.
C. Workers' Compensation: Insurance covering all employees meeting Statutory
Limits in compliance with the applicable state and federal laws.
The coverage must include Employers' Liability with a minimum limit of $500,000
for each accident.
Special Requirements: Collier County shall be listed as the Certificate Holder and
included as an Additional Insured on the Comprehensive General Liability
Policy.
Current, valid insurance policies meeting the requirement herein identified shall
be maintained by Contractor during the duration of this Agreement. Renewal
certificates shall be sent to the County thirty (30) days prior to any expiration date.
There shall be a thirty (30) day notification to the County in the event of
cancellation or modification of any stipulated insurance coverage.
Page 3 of6
16A
6'
Contractor shall insure that all subContractors comply with the same insurance
requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide
County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions.
11. INDEMNIFICATION. To the maximum extent permitted by Florida law, the
Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless Collier County, its officers and
employees from any and all liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not
limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and paralegals' fees, to the extent caused by the
negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Contractor or anyone
employed or utilized by the Contractor in the performance of this Agreement. This
indemnification obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or reduce any other
rights or remedies which otherwise may be available to an indemnified party or person
described in this paragraph.
This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of
Collier County.
12. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of
the County by the Code Enforcement Department.
13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Contractor represents that it presently has no interest and
shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner
with the performance of services required hereunder. Contractor further represents
that no persons having any such interest shall be employed to perform those services.
14. COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS CONTRACT. This Contract consists of the attached
component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the contract as if herein set out
verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, Insurance Certificate, Bid #08-4197 Specifi-
cations/Scope of Services and Addenda.
15. SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION. It is further understood and agreed by and
between the parties herein that this agreement is subject to appropriation by the Board
of County Commissioners.
16. PROHIBITION OF GIFTS TO COUNTY EMPLOYEES. No organization or
individual shall offer or give, either directly or indirectly, any favor, gift, loan, fee,
service or other item of value to any County employee, as set forth in Chapter 112,
Part III, Florida Statutes, Collier County Ethics Ordinance No. 2004-05, and County
Administrative Procedure 5311. Violation of this provision may result in one or more
of the following consequences: a. Prohibition by the individual, firm, and/ or any
employee of the firm from contact with County staff for a specified period of time; b.
Prohibition by the individual and/ or firm from doing business with the County for a
specified period of time, including but not limited to: submitting bids, RFP, and/ or
quotes; and, c. immediate termination of any contract held by the individual and/ or
firm for cause.
Page 4 of6
16A
61
17. IMMIGRATION LAW COMPLIANCE. By executing and entering into this
agreement, the Contractor is formally acknowledging without exception or
stipulation that it is fully responsible for complying with the provisions of the
Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 U.s.e. 1324, et seq. and
regulations relating thereto, as either may be amended. Failure by the Contractor to
comply with the laws referenced herein shall constitute a breach of this agreement and
the County shall have the discretion to unilaterally terminate this agreement
immediately.
18. VENUE. Any suit or action brought by either party to this Agreement against the
other party relating to or arising out of this Agreement must be brought in the
appropriate federal or state courts in Collier County, Florida, which courts have sole
and exclusive jurisdiction on all such matters.
19. OFFER EXTENDED TO OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. Collier County
encourages and agrees to the successful proposer extending the pricing, terms and
conditions of this solicitation or resultant contract to other governmental entities at the
discretion of the successful proposer.
20. AGREEMENT TERMS. If any portion of this Agreement is held to be void, invalid,
or otherwise unenforceable, in whole or in part, the remaining portion of this
Agreement shall remain in effect.
21. ADDITIONAL ITEMS/SERVICES. Additional items and/ or services may be added
to this contract upon satisfactory negotiation of price by the Contract Manager and
Contactor.
Page 5 of6
16A
6 ~~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the County, have each, respectively, by an
authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above
written.
ATTESI' ",q > '
Dwi ,: \ E.' Br'6~'f<;, ~lerk
'~
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
B)"1
Datea: .
Attest ,'f'&\~i~
Slgft.~~}~ c'/" s
- .1')'
" h-
'I:f"C.-."
~t .
By: _
T mg, ai;ma~
Ecosvstem Technologies, Inc.
11
rL 117"
we~1 L-.
By:
Fir\;t W'tness
&>\ l\~ ~~ob-=o()
tTypejprin itness namet
~ Qo.. Ku..A. f'J--.-
Second Witness
~\c:\ (y\. :::TC'N/..S, -:rC) 't'~ld-u..t
Typed signature and title
Cha.rl~ 1I\.P. ~ u'mplo-.
tTypej print witness namet
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
Print Name
Page 6 of6
From: (941)747~9946
To: 1239~337~4494
Page 2/2
Date 3/10/2008 11 :0337 AM
16A
6 ~,'~
ACORD~
CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
DATE IMMIDDlYVVY)
3/1012008
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTlACATE
HOLDER THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
10002752
I
PRODUCER
Risk Concepts Corporation
410 43rd Street West Suite N
Bradenton, FL 34209
Phone 1~877~746-2209
INSURED
Administrative Concepts Corp
406 43rd Street West
Bradenton, Fl 34209
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
Insurer A: S~uthem Eagle Insurance Co
Reinsurer B: _L1oyds of london
Reinsurer c: Aspen Reinsuran~"~_
Reinsurer D: Max Re Bermuda
Re:inSl.lrer E Odyssey Re
NAIC#
AA-1122000
., m AA..:~gO~37 ~ "
,u~~:l.~90829~__
23680
COVERAGES
THE POLICIES OF' INSURANCE LISTED BElOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TOTHE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTiFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL TI-lE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDlTIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES. AGGREGATE lIMlTS SHOWN M.A.Y HAVE BEEN REDUCED BVPAID CLAIMS.
iNSfi~~'l:::::~~~::-'"^,"-,cmM~'~"E~~,B,~L'-'-'WO-E-'-Ee- ^,- "'-8',,'j-,U u ummu~;~;,;;~~;;;;;; mmm mp;?}~EFFEct"iVEP1iDCY~ifj,~jij;N=~H~~u~~R~~~~ u~;~;;~~uuuuuuumuuuum
" ".'. ,_ ' .:ii'~:;'j.:GE.-nrRE:i\::.fOi:5 .m..
.:~8:_:;'_~J~I;;..~_[f;_:;,_l!s:?).r_"L'L~~)___ ~
:-----r---j G.!\llvF, :...lKJF 0 CCCIJR I
tj-~"-
i_0f~':- ,tJ" GGR,'F. i(';A:rf.I.I~ IT :'''F;'=:I.:f.~ PF.R
: ! f','q.ICY 1 PfP-i I i I.'JC
\_r::1ii'2,.;,r'i~!,lipnr'>Olll
PSf<S~~.tl!,,':".~.J\Q\~~:J..J_IE(~
.!.._------ ---
GEN~~AL AC"~-:,p~:,':':'_!_~.____
PR,~;,)IJC'S. ,-;c-"t.p/,' p ~.Gc, ~
: II,UTOM08lLE LIABILITY
:~1
H"r-,YAI)FJ i
~-j N I. O'M,lfD /\UTQS I
~..mj SCHF.['~ILF.r-",UTOS I
,_++_ j ~IPFn,\IIIOS I
J ~:~~~~~~'mTOS _..no I
W__.uuu U____U_)
I
: GARAGE U....BILl1Y
:---1
W ANY Al'F'
i
i
I
I
i
,
I
uul
i
i
:C'i.-l8INE2>3IN(;.LE 1..IMf;"
"_''1 "'cCljl"~f
,
i
I
,
,
I
i
I
u____J
I
I
I
30f)IL'{Il':_::)R'1
"ft;:;-"r:;,."'"
800ILll/':,'UR',
("S' "',.cld<j~l)
PR0?Ei'n " Df,~lI,GE
(PS'f!C"iri.,"J)
~l.~.g.0~~--=----!:,:~,::"~-:ClDt:::1T ~~
EAI>.CC S
_ ~u _u.____u_
J1Y-lEF\~J\,N
Aln,~ l'Nt '(
: EXC=sStUMME:lLA LIABIliTY
~ ("',"..-.UR 0 ClAIMSMA[of.
(-J ,'fJ.1I)(~1't81. F~
: ! :<fTf.l\:TIO~1
(CAer CC(:URRF.t~(f
AGG S
,
,
c------.-.--
.1____
A
WORKERS COMPENSAnON AND
E:MPlOYBt$' L1A.81L1TY
AW ;)RO~IETOR,'PARn.;;::R/E;0CUTIVE
Oi=f::::F.R,~8v1fifR F:<CI.ti"fO"
H yl;~_ de~Ci;h", ""'.~<ii
SP.:;CIAL PROVl3iONS 1),,:'1'"
OTHER
Workers Compensation
Excess Coverage
I ',~,f:~-1tJ,1'1 1._1 ..)TH,
_~.__J~Q.E?Hr:,ll'r.s_L__..l_E?. uu ....................um..._
.fc.~u~::~::.~~.s:.I.~!'!T.....un... L.LQQQ.O.Q.Q_...umun
"L.OI~V~"E E.J\EMPLCtYE $ 1,000,000
::: L. DISl::A.3E . "":<l.ICY UMIT l 1,000,000
Please note that Southerri Eagl8 Insurance Company has relnsur~o ItS ~1~lIities In excess 0 , unaer me po ICles 01
insurance ~sted above with underwriters listed A- or better at the time of placement of such rensurance. Such reinsurance are
subject to their own terms, conditions and limin. This is for informational purposes and netting herein shall create any right
under such reinsurances.
1/112008
i
I
I
WC0272682-00
11112009
BC
DE
oeSCRlPnON Of OPERATIONS I LOCATIONSlveHlCLES !EXClU$IONS Aooeo ~ ENDORSEMENT 'SPECIAL PROVISIONS
Coverage is extended to the leased employees of alternate employer (Florida Operations Only):
Ecosystem Technologies Inc
Effective 7/22/2002 021900
DISCLAIMER: This Certificate of Insurance does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s), authorized representative or producer,
and the certificate holder, nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the polcies listed thereon,
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF'TH:: ABOVE OE;SCRlBm POLlOES BE CANCELLED BEfORE l"HE EXPIRA. TION
Collier County Government
Steve Carnell, PurchasinglGS Director
3301 E Tamiami Trail
Naples, Fl 34112
DATe: ThleREOF, THE ISSUNG INSURER WILL ENDE....VOR TO MAIL 30
OAYS WRITTFN
NOTice TO THE CERTIfiCATE HOLDER NA.MEO TO THE LEfT, BUT FAILURE TO 00 SO SHALL
lMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KINO UPON THE INSLRER, ITS AGENTS OR
REPRESENTATIVES.
AUTHORlZeO REPRESENTATIVe ....--..
Fax#
(941) 252-6584
~..>-.-'-. ...
@lACORDCORPORATlON 1988
ACORD 25 (2001/08)
This fax was sent with GFI FAXmaker fax server. For more information, visit: http://VY'\'WV,gfi.com
From:ALAN WILLIAMS @ ASSOCIATES
239 418 1164
03/10/2008 15:20 #647 P.QJh~IJ\
6
ACORQ,. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I DATE (MMIDD/VYYYI
03/10/2008
PRODUCER (239)418-1100 FAX (239)418-1164 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
Alan Williams & Associates Inc. #1 OHL Y AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
13700-1 Ben C. Pratt/ HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
Six Mile Cypress Pkwy
~yers, Fl 33912 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE HAIC#
INSURED Ecosystem TeChnologies Inc. INSURER A;. Ohio ~sualty Group 24074
2223 McGregor Blvd INSURER B: ---
.._~
Fort Myers I Fl 33901 INSURER c'
---
INSURER O.
--
INSURER E
,..nucRA"ce
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF N4Y CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO All THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS POUCY EXPlRATtON'---------- - ~-
I!'I!! ~!!.!!: - POLICY EFFECTIVE -
TYPE OF INSURANCE POUCY NUMBER UMITS
~ERAL LIABILITY BK052666540 10/16/2007 10/16/2008 EACH OCCURRENCE ~- 1,000 001
X COMMERCIAL CENERAlUABILlTY ~~9E TO RENTED" -
. 100 00
I ClAIMS MADE [K] OCCUR MED EXP (An~ one persoo) . 10 , OO(
A .x Contractual liab. PERSONAL & ADV INJURY . 1 OOO,OO(
- GENERAl AGGREGATE S 2,ODO,OO(
---.--
~:_ AGGREGATE LDIIIT APPLIES PER PRooueTS - COMP/OP AGG S 2.000,001
,nPRO- nl
POlICY JEeT LOG
~TOIIOBlLE UABIUT't' BAW52666540 10/16/2007 10/16/2008 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
.
X ~Y AUlD (Eaaccident) _ 1,000 OO(
f'-'- I-- --~---
f-~ ALL OWNED AUTOS BODilY INJURY
.
SCHEDULEO AUTOS (Per pertiOll)
A "- f--- ------ --~
"- HIRED AUTOS BODilY INJURY
.
NON-OWNED AUTOS (Peraccidenl)
f---
"- PROPERTY DAMAGE .
(Per accident)
RRAGE LlAlllUTV AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIOFNT .
ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACe .
AUTO ONLY AGG S
EXCESSlUMBRIW.A UABUTY ~~H OCCURRENCE. S
r:r OCCUR 0 ClAIMS MADE - -
AGGREGATE S
S
-----.
R DEDUCTIBLE ~~ S
RETENTION . S
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND we STATU- IOTH-
EMPLOYERS' UABlUTY --
ANY PROPRIETORlPARTNERlEXECUTWE El_ EACH ACCIDENT S
--
OFFICERlMEMBER EXCLUDED? E,l DISEASE - EA EMPl.OYE S
~~~~I~~~NS billow E,L DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT S
I.P.!H" BK052666540 10/16/2007 10/16/2008 See poliCY schedule
A ~?mmercial Property & $250,000 Value Rented/leased
IJ,nland Marine $500 Deductible
~RIPTlON OF OPERATIONS I {OCAT1ON81 VEHICLE81 ~CLU.ION. ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT 18PlQAL PROVaSIQN8
o lier County is ncluded as ad itional insured with respect to General liability.
C
Collier County Government
3301 E Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
SHOULD ANY Of' THE ABOVE DESCRtBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXptRATlON DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER Will ENDEAVOR TO MAlL
-12- DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE lEFT,
BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICe SHALL I"POSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABlUTY
OF ANY KIND UPON THe INSURER., ITS AGENTS-OR REPRESENTATIVES.
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ....
Jeff Wi 11i ams
ACORD 25 (2001108) FAX: (239)252-6584
~ :; steve-
Co-v rLe. (I
-_~~"'-UlU~'.
-.
-.'-
16A 6"~
MEMORANDUM
Date:
February 21, 2008
To:
Brenda Brilhart, Purchasing Agent
Purchasing Department
From:
Ann Jennejohn, Sr. Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Contract #08-4197: "Nuisance Abatement Services"
Contractor: Environmental Mowing, Inc.
Attached please find the original contract document, as referenced
above, (Agenda Item #16A6) approved by the Board of County
Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008.
The Minutes & Records Department has also retained an original copy
which will be kept as part of the Board's permanent record.
If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-7240.
Thank you.
Attachments
...--_.._--_._,-~.,~"-~_..._.. ......-----..-"--,,--.--.
ITEM NO.:o& -I?tc- Dr.8?:,O
16A 6~
. J,'" ,._
. " i~'..-P 1\ ~::~~ f '.
'; I ) h J II \'1, '1)1r."IC:"\,
J, \;_ I
DATE RECEIVED:
?-,1'"IP 't '
~',,: ':-':,20
,. '-"1
',f" I.):,
FILE NO.:
ROUTED TO:
DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS LINE
REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES
Date:
March 19,2008
To:
Robert Zachary
Assistant County Attorney
From:
Brenda Brilhart
Purchasing Agent
239-252-8446
Re:
Contract #08-4197 Nuisance Abatement Services
Contractor: Environmental Mowing, Inc.
BACKGROUND OF REQUEST:
This contract was approved by the BCC on February 26,2008; Agenda Item
16.A.6
This item has not been previously submitted.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Contract review and approval.
OTHER COMMENTS:
Please forward to BCC for signature after approval. If there are any questions
concerning the docwnent, please contact me. Purchasing would appreciate
notification when the documents exit your office. Thank you.
3/Jo/15 y -~ T d.uJdJ tf-'Y~.fi:)
c.v~
"3- ~'1_i}Fr
16ft,
6-'
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jeff Walker
Risk Management Department
FROM: Brenda Brilhart
Purchasing Department
DATE: March 19,2008
RE: Review of Insurance for Contract No. 08-4197 Nuisance
Abatement Services
Contractor: Environmental Mowing, Inc
This Contract was approved by the BCC on February 26, 2008;
Agenda Itern16.A.6.
Please review Insurance Certificate in this Agreement for the
above-referenced contract. If everything is acceptable, please forward
to the County Attorney for further review and approval. Also will you
advise me when it has been forwarded. Thank you. If you have any
questions, please contact me at extension 8446.
~
1/ :>/z... () I' 't
16A 6
A G R E E MEN T 08-4197
for
Nuisance Abatement Services
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this 26th day of February, 2008, by and
between Environmental Mowing, Inc., authorized to do business in the State of Florida,
whose business address is 445 - 18th Avenue SE, Naples, Florida 34117, hereinafter called the
"Contractor" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Collier
County, Naples, hereinafter called the "County":
WITNESSETH:
1. COMMENCEMENT. The contract shall be for a one (1) year period, commencing on
February 26, 2008, and terminating on February 25, 2009.
The County may, at its discretion and with the consent of the Contractor, renew the
Agreement under all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement for three
(3) additional one (1) year periods. The County shall give the Contractor written notice
of the County's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior
to the end of the Agreement term then in effect.
2. STATEMENT OF WORK. The Contractor shall provide invasive plant removal and
additional services, as Primary awardee, in accordance with the terms and conditions of
Bid #08-4197 and the Contractor's proposal referred to herein and made an integral part
of this agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the
parties and any modifications to this Agreement shall be mutually agreed upon in
writing by the Contractor and the County Project Manager or his designee, in
compliance with the County Purchasing Policy and Administrative Procedures in effect
at the time such services are authorized.
3. COMPENSATION. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this
Agreement the aggregate of the units actually ordered and furnished at the unit price.
Any county agency may purchase products and services under this contract, provided
sufficient funds are included in their budget(s).
Payment will be made upon receipt of a proper invoice and upon approval by the
Project Manager or his designee, and in compliance with Section 218.70, Fla. Stats.,
otherwise known as the "Florida Prompt Payment Act".
Page 1 of6
16 l~
6"~
4. NOTICES. All notices from the County to the Contractor shall be deemed duly served
if mailed or faxed to the Contractor at the following Address:
Environmental Mowing, Inc.
4145 -18th Avenue SE
Naples, Florida 34117
Attention: KennethJ. Parker, President
Telephone: 239-825-4321
Facsimile: 239-455-2777
All Notices from the Contractor to the County shall be deemed duly served if mailed or
faxed to the County to:
Collier County Government Center
Purchasing Department - Purchasing Building
3301 Tamiami Trail, East
Naples, Florida 34112
Attention: Steve Carnell, Purchasing/GS Director
Telephone: 239-252-8371
Facsimile: 239-252-6584
The Contractor and the County may change the above mailing address at any time
upon giving the other party written notification. All notices under this Agreement
must be in writing.
5. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating
a partnership between the County and the Contractor or to constitute the Contractor as
an agent of the County.
6. PERMITS: LICENSES: TAXES. In compliance with Section 218.80, FS., all permits
necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be obtained by the Contractor. Payment
for all such permits issued by the County shall be processed internally by the County.
All non-County permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be procured
and paid for by the Contractor. The Contractor shall also be solely responsible for
payment of any and all taxes levied on the Contractor. In addition, the Contractor shall
comply with all rules, regulations and laws of Collier County, the State of Florida, or the
U. S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. The Contractor agrees to comply
with all laws governing the responsibility of an employer with respect to persons
employed by the Contractor.
7. NO IMPROPER USE. The Contractor will not use, nor suffer or permit any person to
use in any manner whatsoever, county facilities for any improper, immoral or offensive
purpose, or for any purpose in violation of any federal, state, county or municipal
Page 2 of6
16A
6'~
ordinance, rule, order or regulation, or of any governmental rule or regulation now in
effect or hereafter enacted or adopted. In the event of such violation by the Contractor
or if the County or its authorized representative shall deem any conduct on the part of
the Contractor to be objectionable or improper, the County shall have the right to
suspend the contract of the Contractor. Should the Contractor fail to correct any such
violation, conduct, or practice to the satisfaction of the County within twenty-four (24)
hours after receiving notice of such violation, conduct, or practice, such suspension to
continue until the violation is cured. The Contractor further agrees not to commence
operation during the suspension period until the violation has been corrected to the
satisfaction of the County.
8. TERMINATION. Should the Contractor be found to have failed to perform his
services in a manner satisfactory to the County as per this Agreement, the County may
terminate said agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this
Agreement for convenience with a thirty (30) day written notice. The County shall be
sole judge of non-performance.
9. NO DISCRIMINATION. The Contractor agrees that there shall be no discrimination as
to race, sex, color, creed or national origin.
10. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall provide insurance as follows:
A. Commercial General Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000
Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property
Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent
Contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability.
B. Business Auto Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $500,000 Per
Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property
Damage Liability. This shall include: Owned Vehicles, Hired and Non-Owned
Vehicles and Employee Non-Ownership.
C. Workers' Compensation: Insurance covering all employees meeting Statutory
Limits in compliance with the applicable state and federal laws.
The coverage must include Employers' Liability with a minimum limit of $500,000
for each accident.
Special Requirements: Collier County shall be listed as the Certificate Holder and
included as an Additional Insured on the Comprehensive General Liability
Policy.
Current, valid insurance policies meeting the requirement herein identified shall
be maintained by Contractor during the duration of this Agreement. Renewal
certificates shall be sent to the County thirty (30) days prior to any expiration date.
Page 3 of6
16,A 6
There shall be a thirty (30) day notification to the County in the event of
cancellation or modification of any stipulated insurance coverage.
Contractor shall insure that all subContractors comply with the same insurance
requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide
County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions.
11. INDEMNIFICATION. To the maximum extent permitted by Florida law, the
Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless Collier County, its officers and
employees from any and all liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not
limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and paralegals' fees, to the extent caused by the
negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Contractor or anyone
employed or utilized by the Contractor in the performance of this Agreement. This
indemnification obligation shaH not be construed to negate, abridge or reduce any other
rights or remedies which otherwise may be available to an indemnified party or person
described in this paragraph.
This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of
Collier County.
12. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf
of the County by the Code Enforcement Department.
13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Contractor represents that it presently has no interest and
shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner
with the performance of services required hereunder. Contractor further represents
that no persons having any such interest shall be employed to perform those services.
14. COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS CONTRACT. This Contract consists of the attached
component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the contract as if herein set out
verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, Insurance Certificate, Bid #08-4197 Specifi-
cationsjScope of Services and Addenda.
15. SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION. It is further understood and agreed by and
between the parties herein that this agreement is subject to appropriation by the Board
of County Commissioners.
16. PROHIBITION OF GIFTS TO COUNTY EMPLOYEES. No organization or
individual shall offer or give, either directly or indirectly, any favor, gift, loan, fee,
service or other item of value to any County employee, as set forth in Chapter 112,
Part III, Florida Statutes, Collier County Ethics Ordinance No. 2004-05, and County
Administrative Procedure 5311. Violation of this provision may result in one or more
of the following consequences: a. Prohibition by the individual, firm, andj or any
employee of the firm from contact with County staff for a specified period of time; b.
Prohibition by the individual andj or firm from doing business with the County for a
specified period of time, including but not limited to: submitting bids, RFP, andj or
Page 4 of6
16A
6'
quotes; and, c. immediate termination of any contract held by the individual and; or
firm for cause.
17. IMMIGRATION LAW COMPLIANCE. By executing and entering into this
agreement, the Contractor is formally acknowledging without exception or
stipulation that it is fully responsible for complying with the provisions of the
Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 U.s.e. 1324, et seq. and
regulations relating thereto, as either may be amended. Failure by the Contractor to
comply with the laws referenced herein shall constitute a breach of this agreement and
the County shall have the discretion to unilaterally terminate this agreement
immediately.
18. VENUE. Any suit or action brought by either party to this Agreement against the
other party relating to or arising out of this Agreement must be brought in the
appropriate federal or state courts in Collier County, Florida, which courts have sole
and exclusive jurisdiction on all such matters.
19. OFFER EXTENDED TO OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. Collier County
encourages and agrees to the successful proposer extending the pricing, terms and
conditions of this solicitation or resultant contract to other governmental entities at the
discretion of the successful proposer.
20. AGREEMENT TERMS. If any portion of this Agreement is held to be void, invalid,
or otherwise unenforceable, in whole or in part, the remaining portion of this
Agreement shall remain in effect.
21. ADDITIONAL ITEMS/SERVICES. Additional items and; or services may be added
to this contract upon satisfactory negotiation of price by the Contract Manager and
Contactor.
Page 5 of6
16A
61
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the County, have each, respectively, by an
authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above
written.
Bt:
Dafoed:
Atteltl~~-
~ 1 OIlaturt Ofll.
;;;,~",
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
.
Environmental Mowing, Inc.
Contractor
aM~L<- lu t-I-<-.
.
First Witness
By:
~J,a~
C RIST/j\,A M Y;1i2kr?K.
tType/printwitn7t
J'Jtc--z..-~2A .
Second Witness
f<ENf'/ETH J Pi..JRkt(2 .PRc3//Jt.IJT
Typed signature and title
flMfj]YV H kj}!/rA/
tType/print witness namet
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
~
Print Name
Page 6 of6
03/17/2008 16:22 FAX 2393483994
CARR AND ASSOC
16A 6
1ili002
THE POUdES"O
ANY REQUIREM
MAY PERTAIN_ T
POLICIES.. AGGR
INSR Alll)'L
-.
GENE
Oco
DC!
A 0 0
0
G~N'L
o PO
AUTO
=:J A
LJ A
0 '0 s
18 H
N
LJ -
-- --.- D_
OARA
0 18
,
, .XCE
0 0
0
0 0
10 R
WORKERS C -
EMPLOYERS'
A ANY PROPRI
OFFICER 'ME
If yes, describe
SPEQ.!AL P~Q
OTHER
?~".~~~,ERTIFICA TE OF LIAl,l~ ~,-,-, ~~T~I'!, ~ 15,,'~s~Ets A"MATT, ,E, R"O, [,F, I:~~,~,~r""i-~~~ '_-1
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE I
4735 Santa Barba,. Boulevard HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ,
Nap'.'. FL 34104 __ AL TER TH!"J:;OVEBI\.G"__;~FORDJiQJ)' TI:lE POlICIE~ BEL_OV\[.__
,____ Phon. (~39)348:35~__ Fax (239)345-3994 IINl!l,I~S_R_S AFFORDIN~~OVERAGE__ _ I NAI~_#__
t. . . lNSURERA: First Commerciallnsul'ance Co.
INSURED Environmental Mowing mc ~S~;~R5: - -, ' -- - ---------- ---"-
414518thAveSe ]INsuRe~c:-:=~ ------
NAPLES, FL 34117- 'INSURER_D ___=---________
_ _I _ ______ ____ INS~,RER ~'--____ _________,
COVERAGES INSURER F:
F INSURANCE L.,ISTeO HAVE BEENI'SSUED fa THE INSUREO NAMED ABOVE FOR THr! POLicy PERioD"iNDICATE;O. NOTWITHSTAND1NG-
ENT, TE~M OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WliH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS ceRTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
HE INSURANCE. AFFO~DED BY THE POllC1ES DESCRI8ED HeR~IN !S SUBJ~CT TO ALL THE TE;RMS. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
EGAn. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS,
.TYPE OF INSU....;.CE~~~LI~~~~~~"~ IP~~V~~~~E ~~ff.;~:;::r~lN ----------
RAL LIABILITY
MMERCIAL Ge.N~AAL UABILITY
CLAIMS MADE D OCCUR
LIMITS
...,--.-- ~
EACH OCCUFt~ENCE =t
DAMAGE TO RENTED --
!_~!;MISES_tEa. oCCUJ~~L _ __
~~_ EXP (Any ?~~person) _ __ ___"..
PERSONAL & AOV INJURY
--- -- - --
GENERALAGG~EGATE
__. 1
I_:ODUCTS. C:~IO:~ ___
, COMBINEO SINGLE LIMIT
I ,~~~!~~dl:n~~RY- ----"..
W!r per!Q!!L_
BODILY INJURY ,
::~.:~~t~AMAGE ".,-~-..-.
(PerlaCCident)
AU1-0 ON_~Y~-~A- ACCIOEN!, '" "_ .~.
OTHE;R THAN EA Ace
__~~T~?~~_.. _..-~GG-~' ~.
EACH OCCURRENCE
-.-. ----
AGGRI:GATE
AGGREGATE LIMIT APPlll:;S PER:
L1c:Y 0 PROJE~P LOC __.
MOBILE L.IABll.ITY
NY AUTO
Ll OWNED AUTOS
CHEDULED AUTOS
IRED AUTOS
ON OWNED AUTOS
GE LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
SSIUMBRI!!LLA LIABIUTY
CCUR 0 CLAIMS MAOE
eOUCTlBLE
ETENTION $
O~:I~~TlONAND--- TBD 03/17108 03/17/09 -n1:'S:~~SI~~w.s :0 ~BH~ _
IITOR I PARTNER J EXECUTIVE _ E_~ EAC!:, AC~~~~~ _ 500,000
MSER EXCLUDED? Yes I ' n. OISEAS". EA EMPLOYEE 500,000
. _ __ ___ ~1~~NSbeIOW L__ _ _____J ------- ~~_ ____ _ I n'~I~~ASE~POl'CYL",,~T ---- 500,000
I DESCRIPTION OF OpeRATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLes I E"ClUSIONS ADDEO ay ENDORSEMENT I SPECIAL PROVISIONS
C'" "","'" ""." 0" C,.U", M "..,
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
CANCELlATION
Collier County Government Center
Purchasing Department.Purchasing Building
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, FL 34112
I
ACORD 2S (200ii05) -ell'"
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVIf DESCRIBED POUCIES aE CANceLLED BEFORE THE
EXPIfU.TION DATE TltEfU!OF, THE I$SUING INSURER Will ENDeAVOR TO MAil
20 CAYS WRITTEN NOTICe TO TME CERTIFICATE HOL.OER NAMeD TO
THE LEFT, BUT FAilURE TO 00 $0 SHALL IMPose NO OBL.rGATloN OR LIABILITY
OF ANY KIND UPON THe INSURI!R, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIveS.
- . "-.-.------.---. ........--..--
AUTHORIZEO REPRESENTATIVE;
_.L . :oV'- .
."
- 'i;j)ACORO--CORPORATION1955
CARR AND ASSOC
Sander'S ~ax 10: Olson & DINunzio InS"
16A 6
141003
03/17/2008 16:22 FAX 2393483994
Date; 3/17/2008 03:54 PM
Pagl!l Z af2
CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE
rho canpany lndioated below cortifies that tho 1nsurance afforded by the pOlicy or policles numbered and
described belew'is in force as o~ th~ effective dat~ of th1s cert1f1c~te. This Certificate of Insurance
do~~ not amend. @xtend, or otherwise alter the Terms and Cond1tions of Insuranc@ coverage conta1~@d in any
pol1cy numoered end described balow.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER,
COLUER COUNTY
PURCHASI~G DEPT
3301 TAMIAMI TR E
NAPLES, FL 34112
INSURED,
ENVIRONMENTAL MOWING INC
4145 18TH AVE SE
NAPLES, FL 34117-9175
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I [ J other Liability
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I [ ) Umbrella Form
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Should any of the abOve described policIes be cancelled before the
exp1rat1~ date. the insuranca company will mail 30 days
written not1c~ to the above na~ed cert1f1cate holder.
I
TYPE OF INSURANCE I
LIABILITY I
[Xl Liab11ity and I
Medical Expense I
[X] Personal and ,
Adv~rtis1n9 Injuryl
[XJ Medical E<pen.es I
[Xl Fire Legal I
Liability I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
POLICY NUMBER
& ISSUING CO.
77-AC-826130-3001
NATIONWIDE
MUTUAL
INSURANCE CO.
I POLICY I POLICY I
IEFF. DATE IEXP. DATE I
I 0[-27-08 I 01-27-09 I
I I I Any One Occurrence__...___
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
LIMITS OF LIABILITY
(~LIMITS AT INCEPTION)
I
I
I
$ 1.000.000 I
I
I
I
5.000 r
100.000 I
I
2,000.000 I
1,000.000 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DESCRIPTIO~ OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS
VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL !TEMS
sn:VE CARNELL
CERT HOLDER AlSO LISTEO AS
AOOlrIONAL INSURED
Any On. Person/Org _.... _ _ I 1.000.000
ANY ONE PERSON _.......... $
Any One Fire or Explosion $
~en8ral Aggreg~te~ ....... $
Prod/Comp Ops Aggreg~te* . S
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
[ J RUSINESS AUTO
Bodily Injury
(Ead, Person) ........., 1-
(Each Accldont) .__..... I
Property Damage
(Each Accident) ........ I
CQmblned Single Limit .... I
[ 1 awned
[ 1 Hired
[ ] NOn-owned
EXCESS LIABILITY
~ach Occurrence .......... $
Prod/Comp Ops/01sease
Aggregate* ..._....~__.. S
I STATliTORY L1MlTS
I BODILY INJURY/ACCIDENT _.. $
J Bodily Injury by Diso.se
I EACH EMPLOYEE _....____. $
I Bodily Injury by Disease
I POLlCY LIMIT ........ _ __ $
[ J Workers'
Compensat1on
and
( ] Eilip10yer.'
L 1abll1ty
Effective Date Of Certificate, 01-27-2008
Oate Certificate ISSUed, 03-17-2006
Authorized Representative: PHIL DINUNZIO
Countersigned at, 2536 NORTHB~KE PLAZA OR
NAPLES. FL 341)9
Mar,I8, 2008
9: 12PM
No. 405~ 9 ~I 6
ACORD
:;;,.~..,..,.,..~,;O;--"l'-:-,,,,,......,...,--rrr~r">~~"'l-'''''''~'''''~':::'f.''J1'':'!;;;.''''r"7':1fJ11">;!f''
',~''''~ '~'".'ltP 1.., . J. ;;I'~ -<. ~., _' J',;' "'.. ."_"_'>::l.~ :o!P, '.' ~'If'\ ~,~.~'~""1;",1 ;o;,~J
.'" ,~~w)'~.... .~_ _ ."J',l""~'\ .~.#..~,~~"".
l~~.:.- i'I.:"~ "~'-U" J 1- \~,:, f_ '0 JE':'-.(:.'.d..k.b..p,' ""S'- ':1..'-:,' iU,.1"'lf'Vt~1~"-""","1
2E~j.:~:;~~{['" - ~:;~.':, "';;~L~__:~.,~'-J~ __';;~~\d:;;:....~~t:iL,!iJ
DATE (MflNDDfYY)
pAoovei:R
Steve Roe Allstate Insurance Agency
5628 Strand Boulevard, Suite 2
Naples, Florida 34110
Phone 239~593.7333 Fax 239-593-7334 Toll Free 677-744-11;176
3/1812008
THIS CER,TlFICAU IS IssueoASA MATT1!!ROF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS N
RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIfICATE 110LDER.. THIS OEftTlf1CA.TE DOES NOT AMEND
EXTIiiNP OR ALTeR THE COViiilVoG5 AFFOR:tlW BY THliO pOl.IClea BE;:I,.QW.
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPANY ALLSTATE;
A
COMPANY
.
COMPANY
C
COMPANY
D
p. ~ ,
TI-lIS IS TO CiORTIFYTHAT THE POLtCIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN 155UEOrO!HE INSUR6D NAMED ABOVE FOR n-lE POLICY PE.RIOD INOtCATEO, NOTWITHSTAI>{DING
ANY REQUIREl\llENT. TEFl;M bR CONOITION QF: ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT \NrTH RESPECT TO WHICH THis CERTIFICATE MAY ElE 16SUED OR MAY PERrAlfII:THE INSuRANCE
AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES OESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE rl!.RMS, EXCI..IJ$IONS AND CONDlTloNS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE. BEEN REDUCED B
PAID CLAIMS
,"'!lURED
KENNETH PARKER
4145 18TH AVE SE
NAPLES FL 34117
00
on
'NpeOF,N~URANCE
l'OI.lCyNU....~R PQ\'CYijF\"IOCl'M: lIOl'~Y~"''''M.nON LIU.r!I
DATE(~WOOIYY) o.o.~(M~
GENI::R.AI,....GCR.E~TE
PROouCTS - eOMPIOP
~EFI,80NAL&ADV INJUR
EACH OCCURREr>lCE!
FIRE DA"IAGE: (Iv"y~.
MED EJo;P (AnYONlp<l<S'al)
3880785127S 3/18/08 3/18/09
COMBINEO SINGLE LIMIT
2005 DRJ500 VIN-22166
eODlLYINJUR'T' $500.000 I $500,000
(P....~r"'D"'Pllrllodlk\rl!)
GeN'i:RAlllQ'''11Y
X CO?,\MeRCIAl GEfIIEAAl
"un'
CLAIMS MADE Do<:cul'l
OVI'NCR'S" COlllrntlCTORS
PROT
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
ALLSTATE
A)('("UlO
AlLOWNEO^UTOS
X SCHEOULEDAVTOS
HIRED AUTOS
PROPER.TYDi'!.1AGI::
$500,000 .
NON-QWNEO ....UTOI;I
UEOICAL PAY!oENT
$5,000
GARAGE UA8l11lY
AUro ONLY. EA
ANVA,UTO
OTHER THAT AUTO
EACHAG'GIDENT
AGGR.EGA.TE
EACH OGCURRENCE
UMOOELl.}.. FOR~
AGGR.EG^TE
OTHER THAN lJMBRELL1\
WOftKERS COMPeNSAflON
AND
EMPLO'wl!RSllAllILI1Y
TIlEPROPRIETORI
PAR.TNERS/E}(ECUTIV
EOFFICERGARE::
OiliER
\Net.
El D1&:ASE - POLICY
'^cc
6~1)IIOEA6E-EA
DI!.SCRIMIOt>l OF oPeR.ATIDN!tILOCAT10NBlVEH1GLEWliPEGiAL lTEMli
COlliER COUNTY GOVERNMENT IS liSTED AS 80TH A CERTIFICATE HOLDER AND AN ADDITIONAl INSURED FOR THIS POLICY.
.
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
3301 E TAMIAMI TRAIL
NAPLES, FL 34112
ATTN BRENDA BRILHART
5HOULO AtN Of TI-lIi ABOVE OIi.SCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFOfUi IHti:
EXPI~TlON DATE THER.EDF, THE ISSUINO COMPANY WlL.l.. ENOEAvOR TO MAl
3~ DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTlFJCI\TI; HOLO!;R. NAPJIED TO THE LEfT.
BUT OOLURE TO MA1L3IJCH A NoncE $1-lA,LL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF
ANY KIND UNN tHe OOMPAI\IY, ITS; AGENTS OR REPRE3ENTATNE3.
AurtlOltIZEDREI"FlEe.EHTATIlIE
1616 I~~
MEMORANDUM
Date:
February 21, 2008
To:
Brenda Brilhart, Purchasing Agent
Purchasing Department
From:
Ann Jennejohn, Sr. Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Contract #08-4197: "Nuisance Abatement Services"
Contractor: Environmental Mowing, Inc.
Attached please find the original contract document, as referenced
above, (Agenda Item #16A6) approved by the Board of County
Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008.
The Minutes & Records Department has also retained an original copy
which will be kept as part of the Board's permanent record.
If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-7240.
Thank you.
Attachments
16A6
A G R E E MEN T 08-4197
for
Nuisance Abatement Services
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this 26th day of February, 2008, by and
between Environmental Mowing, Inc., authorized to do business in the State of Florida,
whose business address is 445 -18th Avenue SE, Naples, Florida 34117, hereinafter called the
"Contractor" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Collier
County, Naples, hereinafter called the "County":
WIT N E SSE T H:
1. COMMENCEMENT. The contract shall be for a one (1) year period, commencing on
February 26, 2008, and terminating on February 25, 2009.
The County may, at its discretion and with the consent of the Contractor, renew the
Agreement under all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement for three
(3) additional one (1) year periods. The County shall give the Contractor written notice
of the County's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior
to the end of the Agreement term then in effect.
2. STATEMENT OF WORK. The Contractor shall provide invasive plant removal and
additional services, as Primary awardee, in accordance with the terms and conditions of
Bid #08-4197 and the Contractor's proposal referred to herein and made an integral part
of this agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the
parties and any modifications to this Agreement shall be mutually agreed upon in
writing by the Contractor and the County Project Manager or his designee, in
compliance with the County Purchasing Policy and Administrative Procedures in effect
at the time such services are authorized.
3. COMPENSATION. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this
Agreement the aggregate of the units actually ordered and furnished at the unit price.
Any county agency may purchase products and services under this contract, provided
sufficient funds are included in their budget(s).
Payment will be made upon receipt of a proper invoice and upon approval by the
Project Manager or his designee, and in compliance with Section 218.70, Fla. Stats.,
otherwise known as the "Florida Prompt Payment Act".
Page 1 of6
16A6
4. NOTICES. All notices from the County to the Contractor shall be deemed duly served
if mailed or faxed to the Contractor at the following Address:
Environmental Mowing, Inc.
4145 -18th Avenue SE
Naples, Florida 34117
Attention: Kenneth J. Parker, President
Telephone: 239-825-4321
Facsimile: 239-455-2777
All Notices from the Contractor to the County shall be deemed duly served if mailed or
faxed to the County to:
Collier County Government Center
Purchasing Department - Purchasing Building
3301 Tamiami Trail, East
Naples, Florida 34112
Attention: Steve Carnell, Purchasing/GS Director
Telephone: 239-252-8371
Facsimile: 239-252-6584
The Contractor and the County may change the above mailing address at any time
upon giving the other party written notification. All notices under this Agreement
must be in writing.
5. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating
a partnership between the County and the Contractor or to constitute the Contractor as
an agent of the County.
6. PERMITS: LICENSES: TAXES. In compliance with Section 218.80, F.5., all permits
necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be obtained by the Contractor. Payment
for all such permits issued by the County shall be processed internally by the County.
All non-County permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be procured
and paid for by the Contractor. The Contractor shall also be solely responsible for
payment of any and all taxes levied on the Contractor. In addition, the Contractor shall
comply with all rules, regulations and laws of Collier County, the State of Florida, or the
U. S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. The Contractor agrees to comply
with all laws governing the responsibility of an employer with respect to persons
employed by the Contractor.
7. NO IMPROPER USE. The Contractor will not use, nor suffer or permit any person to
use in any manner whatsoever, county facilities for any improper, immoral or offensive
purpose, or for any purpose in violation of any federal, state, county or municipal
Page 201'6
16A6
ordinance, rule, order or regulation, or of any governmental rule or regulation now in
effect or hereafter enacted or adopted. In the event of such violation by the Contractor
or if the County or its authorized representative shall deem any conduct on the part of
the Contractor to be objectionable or improper, the County shall have the right to
suspend the contract of the Contractor. Should the Contractor fail to correct any such
violation, conduct, or practice to the satisfaction of the County within twenty-four (24)
hours after receiving notice of such violation, conduct, or practice, such suspension to
continue until the violation is cured. The Contractor further agrees not to commence
operation during the suspension period until the violation has been corrected to the
satisfaction of the County.
8. TERMINATION. Should the Contractor be found to have failed to perform his
services in a manner satisfactory to the County as per this Agreement, the County may
terminate said agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this
Agreement for convenience with a thirty (30) day written notice. The County shall be
sole judge of non-performance.
9. NO DISCRIMINATION. The Contractor agrees that there shall be no discrimination as
to race, sex, color, creed or national origin.
10. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall provide insurance as follows:
A. Commercial General Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000
Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property
Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent
Contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability.
B. Business Auto Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $500,000 Per
Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property
Damage Liability. This shall include: Owned Vehicles, Hired and Non-Owned
Vehicles and Employee Non-Ownership.
C. Workers' Com{'ensation: Insurance covering all employees meeting Statutory
Limits in compliance with the applicable state and federal laws.
The coverage must include Employers' Liability with a minimum limit of $500,000
for each accident.
Special Requirements: Collier County shall be listed as the Certificate Holder and
included as an Additional Insured on the Comprehensive General Liability
Policy.
Current, valid insurance policies meeting the requirement herein identified shall
be maintained by Contractor during the duration of this Agreement. Renewal
certificates shall be sent to the County thirty (30) days prior to any expiration date.
Page 3 of6
16A6
There shall be a thirty (30) day notification to the County in the event of
cancellation or modification of any stipulated insurance coverage.
Contractor shall insure that all subContractors comply with the same insurance
requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide
County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions.
11. INDEMNIFICATION. To the maximum extent permitted by Florida law, the
Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless Collier County, its officers and
employees from any and all liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not
limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and paralegals' fees, to the extent caused by the
negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Contractor or anyone
employed or utilized by the Contractor in the performance of this Agreement. This
indemnification obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or reduce any other
rights or remedies which otherwise may be available to an indemnified party or person
described in this paragraph.
This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of
Collier County.
12. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf
of the County by the Code Enforcement Department.
13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Contractor represents that it presently has no interest and
shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner
with the performance of services required hereunder. Contractor further represents
that no persons having any such interest shall be employed to perform those services.
14. COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS CONTRACT. This Contract consists of the attached
component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the contract as if herein set out
verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, Insurance Certificate, Bid #08-4197 Specifi-
cations/Scope of Services and Addenda.
15. SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION. It is further understood and agreed by and
between the parties herein that this agreement is subject to appropriation by the Board
of County Commissioners.
16. PROHIBITION OF GIFTS TO COUNTY EMPLOYEES. No organization or
individual shall offer or give, either directly or indirectly, any favor, gift, loan, fee,
service or other item of value to any County employee, as set forth in Chapter 112,
Part III, Florida Statutes, Collier County Ethics Ordinance No. 2004-05, and County
Administrative Procedure 5311. Violation of this provision may result in one or more
of the following consequences: a. Prohibition by the individual, firm, and/ or any
employee of the firm from contact with County staff for a specified period of time; b.
Prohibition by the individual and/ or firm from doing business with the County for a
specified period of time, including but not limited to: submitting bids, RFP, and/ or
Page 401'6
16A6
quotes; and, c. immediate termination of any contract held by the individual and/ or
firm for cause.
17. IMMIGRATION LAW COMPLIANCE. By executing and entering into this
agreement, the Contractor is formally acknowledging without exception or
stipulation that it is fully responsible for complying with the provisions of the
Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 US.c. 1324, et seq. and
regulations relating thereto, as either may be amended. Failure by the Contractor to
comply with the laws referenced herein shall constitute a breach of this agreement and
the County shall have the discretion to unilaterally terminate this agreement
immediately.
18. VENUE. Any suit or action brought by either party to this Agreement against the
other party relating to or arising out of this Agreement must be brought in the
appropriate federal or state courts in Collier County, Florida, which courts have sole
and exclusive jurisdiction on all such matters.
19. OFFER EXTENDED TO OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. Collier County
encourages and agrees to the successful proposer extending the pricing, terms and
conditions of this solicitation or resultant contract to other governmental entities at the
discretion of the successful proposer.
20. AGREEMENT TERMS. If any portion of this Agreement is held to be void, invalid,
or otherwise unenforceable, in whole or in part, the remaining portion of this
Agreement shall remain in effect.
21. ADDITIONAL ITEMS/SERVICES. Additional items and/ or services may be added
to this contract upon satisfactory negotiation of price by the Contract Manager and
Contactor.
Page 5 01'6
16A6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the County, have each, respectively, by an
authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above
written.
ct.I'.lLJP ". "
AT~tiST: ' " '/
~ight ID ~~!",ii;.C~C=,t"
... .,- ~', ~
J?y::' )
~"~ '
"/ .~ t
AtttIt. ( ..'..... .
s 1 Qilat..... ' <Mt 1 .
<<"/2/1
C~~ l.(.::/ ,~l-t-........ t_l j(/I.-.......(...r....
First Witness
(J r< I snit":) M, /j; K k: c''R.
tType j pri~lt wif!;tne~spame t
/1 J--:-c ~ 4-;7 .
/ 0-L~ . , '/ / _ _
I -
Second Witness
/J1J9m.1/ f} kIJL/~-yJ
, tTypejprint witness namet
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
Print Name
Page 6 01'6
By:
Environmental Mowing, Inc.
Contractor
By: ~/h/n~ftl' 124-
SIgna re
kt--tJNU!-I"T, r~;:}koc '^J.f:"SIMd7.
Typed signature and title
.....-"""L
ACC7>RLI
,.... ~
oa/17/2008 16:23 FAX 2393483994 CARR AND ASSOC ~002
CERT.lfIC~TE OF LIABILITY I~.~URANCE .__._~~F,
THIS CeRTIFICATE IS ISSUI!D AS A MAnER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFBIU NO RIGHTS UPON 'Ill. CERTIFICATE
~ HO~DiR. TtlIS ceRTIFICATE DOES NOT AMl!ND, eXTEND OR
,..F'~ (~~~)~48:39Q4, ",. . ~N~~~:~~j:~~~~~~~v, ~:::=~',II:Y TH.E ~~L~\~;~~OW' """
~!!Mll.A: First Comm.~!~j!l.I,I.!l!,!rance Co. ,'. "__
INSURED Environmental Mowing inc
41461Slh Ave Se INSO..!ml&_...__
IN U~ER <;:..__.... ..". '
NAPLES, FL 34117- IUS
I "',," , IN.!1!i.~_E:
COVERAGES INSURSR F:
. THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED HAVEBEEN ISSUED TO THe INSUReD NAMED A80vi FOR THE POLICY peRIOD INDICATeD. NO'IWITHSTANClNO--'-"-
AKY IIIQUIRE!.IENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF fUlY CONTIlACT OR OTHER OOCUMENT WITH REspeCT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFPDRDBD BY THE POLICies DBSCRIBED HEREIN IS SUIlJECT TO ALL THE TEIIMS, eXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS 0' SUCH
POlJCIES,:.. AIJGREGATB LIMITS !lHOWN MAY HAVE.S!,EN. R!'DUCED IlY PAID C,-!\!M.~, . .._..., '.
1N8R ADD'L POI.IeV 1lFF&CTlV~ POUCY IXftIMTlON
T't!~~ OF INsuRANCE POLleY NUM~ER ~YI M~, . ..!lATE (MMlDDN'Y~ UMfT'8
OENERA~ UAIlILITY EACH OCCURReNCE
o CD...-rERCIAL GeNeRAL LIABILITY i5Ali!AGE TO ReNTED -" '~..
P.,REMISES l~ "CCIl_) _.. ,
A 0 00 CLAIMS MADE 0 occu~ M~!XP~"".p..""'.) ,'. .. .
8 _ 1:,:..,~,,~,,~,~~~",j::l,J,TE,~.:,.~,Go..".'.t-, "--._,.,
GEN'L AGCR!!2^TE LIMIT APPLies PER:' f 1-....:
D.poLlCY U PROJECT..g LOC _
AUTOMOBU LIAJlIUTY
o ANY AUTO
o ALL OWNec AUTOS
o 0 SCHEOULED AUiOS
B HIReD AUTOS
NON OWNED AUTOS
o
n
PROOUC)!ll Carr (I A88oolale$
4735 Santa Barbara Boulevard
Naples, FL 3<1104
Phon" (239)348-3555
COMBINED SINOL.e: L.IMIT
JEa "''''.,9""
BODILY INJURY
(per ~.rson
80DIL V INJURY
(Po, accIaenQ
PROPe~TY DAMAGE
1P.!tocckl8nQ_._
AUTO ONLY :~ "C,CIDENT
OTHER THAN ~
AUTO DNLY~.... ... A
,~~H OCClJ~!!~NC,~ '"
AGGREGATE
.'n..._.._....___....._
GARAGE LiAII'UTY
o 0 MlYAUTO
Q..
I/XCESSlUMBRIlLLA LiAIIlLITY
o OCCU~ 0 CLAIMS MAOE
o
o DECUC118LE
o RETENTION . ...-..,..- ,
woRKiRi'COMPENSATIONANO ,1.,----.. .--_. O.....-.......cr-- '.,.
eMPLOYBR8'UAIIIUTY TBD 03/17/08 03/17/09 ,,:r.~Ii..ll?~s_ glr'
A ON( PROPRIETOR 1 PARiNBRI EXECUTIVE ~,~~,~<<9.EENT_.....__
DFFICER/MIMleR EXCLUDED? Yes E.L9'!!..EASE,~EA .eMPL.O,'y~E
tr)'8l. deearib& under -
"',~ ~.RO\l)"SIONS boJow._.. ...__"_" ......." ...."".._-+~J,c~~.EI\SE, PDLI9YLlMIT
.,. OTHIIR.._......, , .."..__....,.._....... ,..___... ,......_,_".,~........
DESCRIPTlON OF OPERATIONS I LOCAllONS I VEHICLI81 EXCLUSIONe ADDID BY eNDORe.MENT I specIAL PROVISIONS
excluded Partners: Kenneth J Parker and Cristina M Parker
500.1.000
/lOO,OOO
5.0"0.oojl
CERTIFlCATIi HOLDER
-' ,'-"-'-'
CA/oICI!~LATlON
...___ u. ....
SHOULD /IoN'( OF THE ABOVE DI!SCRlII'" POI.ICIU Be CANCeu.ID a&'o~e THE
IIXPIRAllON DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING 1N8URIlIOI WlU. eNDeAVOR TO MAIL
20 DAYS \IIIRITTeN NOTIce TO THE CERTlFICATII HOLDER NAMED TO
THEe LEFT, aUT 'A1~URE TO 00 SO SHAl.LIMPOSI' NO OBUGATlON O~ UAllIUTY
OF ~V KINO UPON THllNSUReR,lTS AGINTS OR REPRESENTATIVes.
. AUTHORIZED ..eltResENTATMi"-" . .. --_..... -"
..L . ~"- . .........
, -----."ilj'ACORDCOItPORA1'ioN 1988
Collier COunty Govemm.ant Cftnler
Purchasing Oepsrtment.PurcI1aslng Building
3301 Tamiaml Trail east
Niaple.. F~ 34112
. I
ACORD 25 (2Uu1/ue) QF
03/17/2008 16:23 FAX 2393483994
,,"IB: 3/17/2008 03:54 F'M
CARR AND ASSOC
Send..... Fox 10: OIoon a DitIkJn:tlo Ins
~003
16 fA (fDt'a8a.,
CERTIFICATE OF INSURAMCE
The company indicated below C4!rt1ftes that the insurance afforded by the policy or policies nllllbttrQd and
dllSc'ribecl b.low is in fore. lIS of the effective date of this certificate. This Certificata of Insurance
does not amend. eKtend, or otherwise altor the TaMIlS and Conditions of Insurance coverage contained in any
poliCY ntJllbered and deseribed bel arl.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER,
COLLIER COUNTY
PURCHAsiNG OEPT
3301 TAMIAMI TR E
"^PLES, FL 34112
I~URED:
ENVIIlDNfolEHTALI<<lWING INC
414S 18TH AVE SE
NAPLES. FL 34117-9175
I I POll CY NUMBEIl I POLICY f POLICY I LIMnS OF L1ASI Lln I
I TYPE OF INSURANCE I & ISSUING CO. IEFF. DATE IEXP. DATE I (*lIMITS AT INCEPTION) I
I LIAlIILITY I 77'AC-826130.3001 I 01-27-08 , 01-27-09 I I
I [X) Liabil ity and I "^TlONWIOE I I I ~ One Occurrence,....... $ 1,000.000 I
I Medl cal Upense I MUTUAL I I I I
I [Xl Personal and 1 INSURANCE co. I I I Any One Person/Org '...... S 1,000.000 I
I Advertising Injury! I I I I
I [X) Mlldi ca 1 Expenses , I I I A~ ONE PERSON ........... $ 5.000 1
I (X) Fire legal I I I I Any One Fire or E>cplasion $ 100.000 I
I It obi 1; t,y I I I I I
I I I I I Senera 1 Aggregete* ....... , 2.000,000 I
I I I I I Prod/Camp Ops Aggregate* . $ 1.000.000 I.
I [ J Other LiabIlity I I I I I
I I
I AUT<Ml8I LE llA8lLITY I I I I I
I r ) BUSINESS AUTO I I I I BodIly Injury I
I I I I I (Each Person) .......... s I
I [ l (),mod I I I I (Each Acol dent) ........ I I
I [ ) H1red I I I I Property IlaItJaQo I
I ( ) Non-(),med I I I I (Each AccIdent) ... ..... $ I
I I I I I Combined Single Limit "'. S I
I I
I EXCESS llAllI LITY I I I , Each OCcurrence .......... $ I
I I I I I Prod/comp Cps/Oiseas. I
I ( J Umbrella Form I I I , Aggregate* ............. I I
I I
I , I I STATUTORY LIMITS I
I r ) Workers' I I I BODILY INJURY/ACCIOENT ." S I
I Compensation I I I BodIly Injury by 0lseas. I
I end I I I tACH EMPLOYEE. ......... s I
I [ ] Employers' I I I Sodily Injury by Ofsee.. I
I Liability I I I POLICY LIMI'T ........... S I
I I
Should any of the aOove described poliCIes be cancelled before the DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIDNS/LOCAflONS
e.pirat1cn date. the insurance canpeny wl1l ",,;1 30 dllY' VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS
wrItten notice to the above nen.d certificate hold.r. STEVE CARNELL
CERT HOLDER ALSO LISTED AS
ADDITIONAL I HSUREO
Effective Oate of Certificate: 01,27'2008
Date Cartificate Is.uo<l: 03'17'2008
Authorized Representat1ve: PHIL DINUNZIO
Countersigned at: 2536 HOIITHSIlOOKE PLAZA OR
NAPLES. FL 34119
Mar. 18. 2008
9: 12 PM
No.4059
l~f~~
ACORD
?:~~i~~ ~;::- ?"'~~:~~-"~1:7::7)~ ~~:i;:r':~:(.~~:.<J~~;
.~~~. ,,'.r _ ,\", ". L ~l:..',l..j,_.4 -.,.-.....~.....\.;"';j".<_ r.1..U.'o ,"",j
<>0 J. _:!>~ ".,. -'- :'.", _, ' ~ ~~~~"1..:."~.!.C.1:'-~~~~_~
DATE (MPNDDIYY}
"AODveER
Steve Roe Allstate Insulllnce Agenf;Y
5628 Strand Boulevard, Suite 2
Naples, Florida $4110
Pholle 2~g...593-7333 Fax 239-593-7334 Toll Free 677-744~167a
3/1612006
THIS CERTlF1CAU. IS ISSU&D AS A MATT5R OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFiRS
~ttTS UPON THE CERTIfICATE HOWER. THllS OEftllFlCATE DOES NOT AMI:ND
lDCTEND OR IU.'TER THli c;:gVliii~= 1lFF0FtDEP DY THi POI.IOIE8 BEl..OW.
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPANY ALLSTATE
A
COMPANY
.
IH!I;URED
KENNETH PARKER
4145 18TH AVE SE
NAPLES FL 34117
COMPANY
C
COMPANV
o
THIS IS TO C~TIFYn1AT THE POLICIES OF INBURANCE LISTED 6EI.OVV HAVE BEEN ISSUED'J'O TH SUR NAME:OABOVE POLlCY PERIOD IN . TANDING
AtfY "~QUIREMENT. TeIUol bR CONDITlON OF ANY CONTRAcT OR OTHER DOCUMENT VIIITH RE5f'ECT TO WHICH THis CERTIFICATE MAY BE leaUED OR MAY 1'ooAII\I- THE IN&uRANCE
A~~OR:DED BY THE POUCIES DESCRIBED HE"fIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE Te.r:c~S, E.XCl.U$IONS ANO CO~OlTIONS OF SUCH POliCIES, UMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEeN REDUCED B
PAlO CLAIMS
~
en
'I'T'!Of'INMJIWlCt:
"""-,,,y_A POlw:YliF~ pQLll:vv:-.o.TmN ,-~
DATElMMlDllIT'r') l>IO.~l~
""HE AOOII.EOATE
p~ouCTS. COMP/OP
1lER.6QNAl & ADV INJUR
EACH OOCufl.RENCEl
FIR€ DAA1"GE I/<foy~.
~o IAITyCllll~llI'l)
388076572711 3116/1Ja 3118/09
COMBINED SINGLE L.,rr
2005 DR3500 VIN-22166
eoCllL'r'IN,lUR'T' $500.000 I $500,000
jP"'pIIrsOOfPOIlICddlantl
GEl'aw.llQll,lfY
;0; CQI,WI!RClALGEf\lE~L
,un-
ClAIMS MACE DOOOuI'l
~~$.CO~~TO~S
'"''
ALLSTATE
AUTOMOBILE LlA8Il1TY
AHf,wTO
ALL OWNED ...1IT0$
X SCHEDULED ...UT05
HlREOAlITOS
NOO.QWNEO AUTO!;l
PROPERlY r:wu.G1:
$500,000
UEOrCAL JlAYWiNT
$5,000
GARACiEUABlLITY
"NYAUTO
AUTQONLY.EA
OTHER THAT AUTO
',~'""E;: --1~~~~
EAt;HACCClENT
AIJGREGl.TE
EACH OCCURRENCE
A f1<;ATI:
IN"
l,..fl!'rORY
EL EACH ACCIDENT
WORKER:!; C;OIlPI!N&.ArlOl'l
AND
EMPLOYI!Il.SLIA8LITY
TMEPRCIl"RIETORI
PARTNERSlEX'CCUTIV
EOFFICE~ARI;:
OTllER
ElDlSEAS!;.POLICY
,,"-
~~ QIiEA5E - EA
DI!KRrP"flOH OF oPe~T10N9ILOCAnoN8IVEHlCLUI5PE(;1A1.ITEMI
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT IS LISTED AS 80T~ A CERTIFICATE ~OLDER AND AN ADDITIONAL INSURED FOR THIS POLICY.
r~~"-t'-,q"'J~~'-:\~1T~"'~~' ", ~,-':-. '-.- ~.'-~~~""""'I;p~"(:~~1.:'\:'flq~
~""~_... ~""~ . ~J---'L....... ,,'-....,_~~~ ~ ,..J_-, ""'" _-' :~:;::;,:::~"""'~~...... ~_'"-..",j-~- ~""""i",""'X"",,,,,,_~'c.I~:;j
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMi:NT
3301 E TAMIAMI TRAIL
NAPLES, FL 34112
ATTN: BRENDA BRIL~ART
SHOULD ANY OF TI.1I5 ABove DEliCRIBIiilD POUCIES BE CANlJELLED BEFORi Itll:::
EXPlAJ,T10N DAn;: THeftEOl", THE ISSU~O COMf'o\NT Wll.L GNDEAVOR TO MAl
3Q DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THIi ~I"IOA."I! tfOLDEIt. NHl'ED TO THI! LEFT
Bur FAiLURE TO MAll5UCH A Ncmc:1i SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY Of
"NY KIND UPON tHE COMPANY, rrs AGENTS OR REPftESENTATJYES,
AUI~D"'EI'fI&EllTA1I\IE
16A6 r1
MEMORANDUM
Date:
February 21, 2008
To:
Brenda Brilhart, Purchasing Agent
Purchasing Department
From:
Ann Jennejohn, Sr. Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Contract #08-4197: "Nuisance Abatement Services"
Contractor: Ecosystems Technology
Attached please find the original contract document, as referenced
above, (Agenda Item #16A6) approved by the Board of County
Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008.
The Minutes & Records Department has also retained an original copy
which will be kept as part of the Board's permanent record.
If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-7240.
Thank you.
Attachments
16A6
A G RE E MEN T 08.4197
for
Nuisance Abatement Services
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this 26th day of February, 2008, by and
between Ecosystem Technologies, Inc., authorized to do business in the State of Florida,
whose business address is 2223 McGregor Boulevard, Fort Myers, Florida 33901, hereinafter
called the "Contractor" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida,
Collier County, Naples, hereinafter called the "County":
WITNESSETH:
1. COMMENCEMENT. The contract shall be for a one (1) year period, commencing on
February 26, 2008 and terminating on February 25, 2009.
The County may, at its discretion and with the consent of the Contractor, renew the
Agreement under all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement for three
(3) additional one (1) year periods. The County shall give the Contractor written notice
of the County's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior
to the end of the Agreement term then in effect.
2. STATEMENT OF WORK. The Contractor shall provide lawn services, as Primary
awardee, and invasive plant removal and additional services, as Secondary awardee, in
accordance with the terms and conditions of Bid #08-4197 and the Contractor's
proposal referred to herein and made an integral part of this agreement. This
Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties and any
modifications to this Agreement shall be mutually agreed upon in writing by the
Contractor and the County Project Manager or his designee, in compliance with the
County Purchasing Policy and Administrative Procedures in effect at the time such
services are authorized.
3. COMPENSATION. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this
Agreement the aggregate of the units actually ordered and furnished at the unit price.
Any county agency may purchase products and services under this contract, provided
sufficient funds are included in their budget(s).
Payment will be made upon receipt of a proper invoice and upon approval by the
Project Manager or his designee, and in compliance with Section 218.70, Fla. Stats.,
otherwise known as the "Florida Prompt Payment Act".
Page 1 01'6
16A6
4. NOTICES. All notices from the County to the Contractor shall be deemed duly served
if mailed or faxed to the Contractor at the following Address:
Ecosystem Technologies, Inc.
2223 McGregor Boulevard
Fort Myers, Florida 33901
Attention: Jim Walsh, Vice President
Telephone: 239.337-5310
Facsimile: 239-337.4494
All Notices from the Contractor to the County shall be deemed duly served if mailed or
faxed to the County to:
Collier County Government Center
Purchasing Department. Purchasing Building
3301 Tamiami Trail, East
Naples, Florida 34112
Attention: Steve Carnell, Purchasing/GS Director
Telephone: 239-252-8371
Facsimile: 239.252.6584
The Contractor and the County may change the above mailing address at any time
upon giving the other party written notification. All notices under this Agreement
must be in writing.
5. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating
a partnership between the County and the Contractor or to constitute the Contractor as
an agent of the County.
6. PERMITS: LICENSES: TAXES. In compliance with Section 218.80, F.S., all permits
necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be obtained by the Contractor. Payment
for all such permits issued by the County shall be processed internally by the County.
All non-County permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be procured
and paid for by the Contractor. The Contractor shall also be solely responsible for
payment of any and all taxes levied on the Contractor. In addition, the Contractor shall
comply with all rules, regulations and laws of Collier County, the State of Florida, or the
U, S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. The Contractor agrees to comply
with all laws governing the responsibility of an employer with respect to persons
employed by the Contractor.
7. NO IMPROPER USE. The Contractor will not use, nor suffer or permit any person to
use in any manner whatsoever, county facilities for any improper, immoral or offensive
purpose, or for any purpose in violation of any federal, state, county or municipal
ordinance, rule, order or regulation, or of any governmental rule or regulation now in
Page 2 of6
16A6
effect or hereafter enacted or adopted. In the event of such violation by the Contractor
or if the County or its authorized representative shall deem any conduct on the part of
the Contractor to be objectionable or improper, the County shall have the right to
suspend the contract of the Contractor. Should the Contractor fail to correct any such
violation, conduct, or practice to the satisfaction of the County within twenty-four (24)
hours after receiving notice of such violation, conduct, or practice, such suspension to
continue until the violation is cured. The Contractor further agrees not to commence
operation during the suspension period until the violation has been corrected to the
satisfaction of the County.
8. TERMINATION. Should the Contractor be found to have failed to perform his
services in a manner satisfactory to the County as per this Agreement, the County may
terminate said agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this
Agreement for convenience with a thirty (30) day written notice. The County shall be
sole judge of non-performance.
9. NO DISCRIMINATION. The Contractor agrees that there shall be no discrimination as
to race, sex, color, creed or national origin.
10. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall provide insurance as follows:
A. Commercial General Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000
Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property
Damage Liability, This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent
Contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability.
B. Business Auto Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $500,000 Per
Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property
Damage Liability. This shall include: Owned Vehicles, Hired and Non-Owned
Vehicles and Employee Non-Ownership.
C. Workers' Compensation: Insurance covering all employees meeting Statutory
Limits in compliance with the applicable state and federal laws.
The coverage must include Employers' Liability with a minimum limit of $500,000
for each accident.
Special Requirements: Collier County shall be listed as the Certificate Holder and
included as an Additional Insured on the Comprehensive General Liability
Policy.
Current, valid insurance policies meeting the requirement herein identified shall
be maintained by Contractor during the duration of this Agreement. Renewal
certificates shall be sent to the County thirty (30) days prior to any expiration date.
There shall be a thirty (30) day notification to the County in the event of
cancellation or modification of any stipulated insurance coverage.
Page 3 01'6
16A6~~
Contractor shall insure that all subContractors comply with the same insurance
requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide
County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions.
11. INDEMNIFICATION. To the maximum extent permitted by Florida law, the
Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless Collier County, its officers and
employees from any and all liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not
limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and paralegals' fees, to the extent caused by the
negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Contractor or anyone
employed or utilized by the Contractor in the performance of this Agreement. This
indemnification obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or reduce any other
rights or remedies which otherwise may be available to an indemnified party or person
described in this paragraph.
This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of
Collier County.
12. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of
the County by the Code Enforcement Department.
13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Contractor represents that it presently has no interest and
shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner
with the performance of services required hereunder. Contractor further represents
that no persons having any such interest shall be employed to perform those services.
14. COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS CONTRACT. This Contract consists of the attached
component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the contract as if herein set out
verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, Insurance Certificate, Bid #08-4197 Specifi-
cationsjScope of Services and Addenda.
15. SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION. It is further understood and agreed by and
between the parties herein that this agreement is subject to appropriation by the Board
of County Commissioners.
16. PROHIBITION OF GIFTS TO COUNTY EMPLOYEES. No organization or
individual shall offer or give, either directly or indirectly, any favor, gift, loan, fee,
service or other item of value to any County employee, as set forth in Chapter 112,
Part III, Florida Statutes, Collier County Ethics Ordinance No. 2004-05, and County
Administrative Procedure 5311, Violation of this provision may result in one or more
of the following consequences: a. Prohibition by the individual, firm, andj or any
employee of the firm from contact with County staff for a specified period of time; b.
Prohibition by the individual andj or firm from doing business with the County for a
specified period of time, including but not limited to: submitting bids, RFP, andj or
quotes; and, c. immediate termination of any contract held by the individual andj or
firm for cause.
Page 4 of6
16A6
17. IMMIGRATION LAW COMPLIANCE. By executing and entering into this
agreement, the Contractor is formally acknowledging without exception or
stipulation that it is fully responsible for complying with the provisions of the
Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 U.s.e. 1324, et seq. and
regulations relating thereto, as either may be amended. Failure by the Contractor to
comply with the laws referenced herein shall constitute a breach of this agreement and
the County shall have the discretion to unilaterally terminate this agreement
immediately.
18. VENUE. Any suit or action brought by either party to this Agreement against the
other party relating to or arising out of this Agreement must be brought in the
appropriate federal or state courts in Collier County, Florida, which courts have sole
and exclusive jurisdiction on all such matters.
19. OFFER EXTENDED TO OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. Collier County
encourages and agrees to the successful proposer extending the pricing, terms and
conditions of this solicitation or resultant contract to other governmental entities at the
discretion of the successful proposer.
20. AGREEMENT TERMS. If any portion of this Agreement is held to be void, invalid,
or otherwise unenforceable, in whole or in part, the remaining portion of this
Agreement shall remain in effect.
21. ADDITIONAL ITEMS/SERVICES. Additional items andj or services may be added
to this contract upon satisfactory negotiation of price by the Contract Manager and
Contactor.
Page 5 01'6
16,16
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the County, have each, respectively, by an
authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above
written.
.' ,;:,"oI-j1'")
'. -. '1r'l)
ATTEST:' ~>
Dwi t K Brock~\=let . of Courts
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COU,Y, FLORIDA .
By: J'i'1t
By:
Dated(:;J
Attnt~~
,lqMtur-e 00 1.
Tom Henning, Chairman
/1
I'll ',' '11\
W3{"
By:
\;,
~\o b'2c' n
t(
tTypejprint tness namet
~OQ'-Jl R~
Second Witness
(\ .
.~...Jo...l.l\~ M..::r of'\(.~ I So' )
Typed signature and title
P~.l: l~,J-
C h..lI.J{'l~ M _ R u...mpL--.
tTypejprint witness namet
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
A"ibS~.:'
Print Name
Page 6 of6
From: (941)747.9946
To: 1239.337-4494
Page: 2/2
Date 3/10/200811 :03:37 AM
16A6
ACORD". CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 10002752 I DATE lU.MIDOIYYVy/
3/1012008
PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
Risk Concepts Corporation ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
410 43rd Street West Suite N HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
Bradenton, Fl 34209 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POliCIES BELOW.
Phone: 1-877-746-2209 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC#
INSURED Insurer A: Southern Eagle Insurance Co.
Administrative Concepts Corp Reinsurer B: L10yds of London AA.1122000
406 43rd street West Reinsurer C: Aspen Reinsurance AA.1120337
Bradenton, FL 34209 Reinsurer 0: Max Re Bennuda AA.3190829
, R~insur~r E: Odyssey Re 23680
COVERAGES
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TOTHE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REOUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERT!FICATE !\(A.Y BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDEO BYTHE POLlC!ES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND COODIT10NS OF SUCH
POLICIES, AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
iNSR '-[jO"l~. '~'EN.: ~RAO--M"~'''E~R''~C''':~GENERA'' . """8'" ","T',,"IU ___'..u" '~;~l~.~~~~.mu n...... '?OlitYJf~~1E' 'Pg~~~~~~~N' ~~~"~.~.~~~.~~~~~.---~;~;;~~--- ..muuuuu mum_o"
~"'....... LL L. 'o;..)}.il;GE'f1:Yt.1t::;\i-:E!:Y' ...... 'n'"
, ~ J GAIM3 .1ADE 0 CCCUR _~~;~~~~:~~,~~:o~:~~~~;__: m. mum".n
, , I
~
: : I
.----'
~n.AGGRF.~f..I.IMIT "'\p~~ pm
! ! Pt-Jl.ICY I I ~.E~~ I ! I. IV;
: AUTOMoellE lIAellllY
c~
!..___j ANy A'.;f':;
: i I\ll. ,l',\itlF:-r:l,l\UT0S
~
L...J SCHEOlXILEDi,UTQS
~_.uJ ~IRED,~UTOS
fum] :.JOf'J.(:".V'lNED ,\UTO$
~
I PERSON!'':' & AU,/INJURY
,
:~~!,f,1. t..G,::'R"GI'.TE
~W;DIl':--;2~,- '.;l!'.;P/l"}p ~.G(; ~
"---
C:'I,lalNEa S IHGLE L IMff
(Eo 8ccider~f
,-'
: 30GIL'( II': _;~R ,{ $
L~:~~~:~.~~~~um.... n...........
I ['OC':L'r IN,~dRY
("e.-gccic1i>:1lJ
s
::;
! GARAGE LlABILlTY
c-o
H ,'.Ny AL'TO
i
! t:XCESSlUMBRELLA L1ABlUTY
c-, D
~ CK.l-.l;::< ClAIMSMACE
PR0;JERT" D/\MAGE
(P9,a.::cirl&rt11
--~- --.-" ",,-----"
i\U"O ON~'(. E~ACCID8-.jT
,
A
n:;)f:'f)IKl"I8I.E
~ ~ETf.NTION $
WORKERS COMPENSA nO'N AND
EMPLOYERS'l.,1A8ILlTY
Ar-..'f :'>ROf"-RIETOR:PARTN~RIEXECUTIVE
O",i':CF.R.'MDV:8fh: f.)(.CI.l;OI?D?
lIy"s,dasr-.l:h(lull'ii'-f
SPECIAL PRO\JIG!ONS be:c....
OTHER
Workers Compensation
Excess Coverage
-T--
I
::J1'"lER TI--:A.N
AI,:,) l~NL 'f;
FA".CC S
~.<:;::JRRF.I'';C,E':
"'.GC;,Rf.C,"'.Tr:
AGG S
,
,
f---.-
e-----
,
:}
:}
Be
DE
x I \!\,f:; S'i A.rLJ'_I"""I~JRH"
1/112008 1/112009 .._._LLQR:.-'.J.MlT.S.L ___u....___u___m..m.___n
! r.~c~:.E!.:~~.J.~"~_lg.E!'.:!...m_m_. L.LQQQ.9.QQ...mu_..-
I E.LDISEr...3E"E'AEMPL,-:)YE ~ 1,000000
I 1 [': L. OISEA.ClE. POLICY UMIT ~ 1,000,000
ease note that Southern Eagle Insurance Company has relnsurea its labllties In excess a , under t e po ICles aT
insurance listed above with underwritern listed A. or better at the time of placement of such rensurance. Such reinsurance are
subject to their own terms, conditions and limits. This is for informational purposes and nothing herein shall create any right
undersuchreinsurances.
WC0272682.00
oeSCRlPTION Of" OP~TIONS! lOCA110NS IVEHlCLES' EXCll)SIONS ADDEO BY ENOORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS
Coverage is extended to the leased employees of alternate employer (Florida Operations Only):
Ecosystem Technologies Inc
Effective: 7/22/2002 021900
DISCLAIMER: This Certificate of Insurance does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s), authorlzed representative or producer,
and the certificate holder, nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the po~cies listed thereon.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
CANCEllATION
Collier County Government
steve Carnell, Purchasing/GS Director
3301 E Tamiarni Trail
Naples, FL 34112
SHOlA..O ANY OF THEABOVE DESCRIBED POL.ICIES BE CIl.NCELLED BEFORE THE EXPfRA TlON
DATE 1l-lEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MIl.Il. ~ DAYS WRITIEN
NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOlDER NAMED TO THE l.EFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL
IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON mE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR
REPRBSENTA TlVES.
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTA 11ve ,.-
Fax#
(941) 252,6584
\
",,,,,,_.')'.J.. ... l!IJ-....
@ACORDCORPORATlON 1988
ACORD 25 (2001/08)
This fax was sent with GFl FAXmaker fax server. For more information. visit: http://v{vwv.gfi,com
From:ALAN WILLIAMS @ ASSOCIATES 239418 1164 03/10/2008 15:20 #647 P.OOI/001
A CORa. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
PRODUCER (239)418-1100 FAX (239)418-1164
Alan Williams & Associates Inc. #1
13700-1 Ben C. Pratt/
Six Mile Cypress Pkwy
Ft.Myers, FL 33912
INSURED Ecosystem Technologies Inc.
2223 McGregor Blvd
Fort Myers, FL 33901
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF 0
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFiCATE
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
!NSURERA Ohio ~sualty Group
INSURER B:
INSURER C'
INSURER D:
INSURER E:
NAIC#
24074
cnuERA"c~
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHE~ DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
'!'I!!l ~!!.'!:! PQUCY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION ----
TYPE OF !NSURANCE POUCY NUMBER LIMITS
~ENERAL LIABILITY BK052666540 10/16/2007 10/16/2008 EACH OCCURRENCE , l,OOO.OOU
X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY DAMAGE TO RENTED ---,- , 100,00r
I CLAIMS MADE [K] OCCUR MEa EXP (Anyone person) , 10 , oor
A ~ Contractual Liab. PERSONAL 8. ADV INJURY , l,OOO,OOr
-.
t- GENERAL AGGREGATE , 2,000,00(
h.t AGG~nE LIMIT APnS PER PROOUCTS - COMPfOP AGG , 2 ooo,oor
POlICY ~~8r LOC
I--A~TO"OBILE lIA81LITY BAW52666540 10/16/2007 10/16/2008 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
~ ANYAUTO (Eaaccident) , 1,000 oor
I~ AlL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY
{per person) ,
A '- SCHEDULED AUTOS -
'- HIRED AUTOS BQDll Y INJURY
(Peracadanl) ,
~ NON-OWNED AUTOS
'- PROPERTY DAMAGE ,
(Per accident)
RRAGE UAB'UTY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT ,
/lj4Y AUTO OTHER THAN EAACC ,
AUTO ONLY AGG ,
=.=JESS/UMBREllA llAfUUTY EACH OCCURRENCE ,
OCCUR 0 CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE ,
,
-
~ DEDUCTIBLE f----- ,
RE"'[ENTION , ,
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND Ur~C5;rf.I\l.~1 IOJ~-
QR',
EMPLOYERS' UA81LITY E-L EACH ACCIDENT ,
AIN PROPRIETORlf'ARTNERfEXECUTIVE
OFFtCERlMCMBER EXCLUDED? E.l DISEASE - EA EMPlOYE $
~~~I~S~W~J:~orNS below EL DfSEASE. POLICY LIMIT ,
jjTHER . Property 8. BK052666540 10/16/2007 10/16/2008 See policy schedule
onmerclal
A nland Marine $250,000 Value Rented/Leased
$500 Deductible
~RIPT1ON OF OPERATIONS I lOCATIONS 1 VEHICLES I ~CLUSIONS ADDEO 8Y ENDORSEMENl' I SPECIAL. PROVISIONS
o lier County is included as ad itional insured with respect to General liability.
C
H
R
C
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRAT10N DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING III/SURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL
~ DAYS WRITTEN NOT1CE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,
BUT FAILURE TO MAll SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY
Collier County Government
3301 E Tam;ami Trail
Naples, Fl 34112
Jeff Williams
ACORD 25 (2001108) FAX: (239)252-6584
~ :; SfctJ e- Co..'y r\..t (I
w=~~"',1l:-. -.\,
._(,
,-'
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING ~~Lor d
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO '3 -3 --o~
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original do\:umcnts should be hand delivered to the Board Office, The completed routing slip and 'gi~ A
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Otlice only after the B(i~~~i~a~os~;~ item.) .J. 0 ?
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or infonnation needed. If the document is already complete with the
exceotion ufthe Chainnan's sie:oature, draw a line throue:h routillo lines # 1 through #4, comolete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routinf! order)
I. Sue Filson BCC
2. Judy Puig CDES Admin CAf ;;-;)(".08'
3. Michelle Arnold Code Enforcement rhlj 02.-,,- ot
4.
5.
6.
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMA nON
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the BeC has acted to approve the
item)
Name of Primary Staff Marlene Stewart Phone Number 252-2496
Contact
Agenda Date Item was d.J~v/O'B' Agenda Item Number 16A'7
Approved bv the BCC
Type of Document Release & Satisfaction of Lien Number of Original 65
Attached Documents Attached
I.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a TO riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (AIl documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fuIly executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCe approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a Iicable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the Bec office within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on -.:I ,0 (enter date) and all changes
made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The .
Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable.
Yes
(Initial)
N/A (Not
A licable)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
@f
IJ J If-
0f
cat
I: Forms/ County Forms/ Bee Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
16A?
Recommendation to approve the Release and Satisfaction of Code Enforcement
Liens for payments received
OBJECTIVE:
To approve execution and recording of the Release and Satisfaction of the listed Liens,
acknowledging compliance and recovery of fines and fees related to prosecution of Code
Enforcement matters
CONSIDERATIONS:
Reference Owner of Record Folio Lien Amount
CEB 2006-45 Jesus & Laura Perez 00082961963 $1,200.00
OSM 2006010158 Jesus & Laura Perez 00075200000 $141.09
OSM 2006030904 Armando Yzaguirre 63865240000 $124.34
OSM 2006010540 Francis, Paul & Christopher Lombard 62710200002 $520.00
OSM 2005100286 David Esquivel 66881480003 $5,787.50
OSM 2004110262 Jason Mardis 36514360006 $6,601.25
OSM 2003030309 Amerada Hess Corp. 35640720003 $179.41
OSM 2005070501 Jeffrey & Keith Basik 61510000021 $231.83
OSM 2006110321 Courthouse Shadows Consolidated 00126880007 $659.37
Holdings, Inc.
OSM-SO 145163 Randall Latona N/A $550.00
& 145164
OSM 2006100007 Patricia Dolan 00769680004 $197.99
OSM 2006070400 Ted Barrett, Est. 52393600000 $132.45
OSM 2005070279 Roberto Conti & Gerarda Daidone 55052640007 $156.90
OSM 2006100318 John Emery 81271201301 $384.57
OSM 2006020911 Jeremiah Doran & Hasan Karagoz 63864160000 $151.54
OSM 2006020362 Marco Orbegoso 26630080005 $681.18
OSM 2005110778 Jesus Ayala 00127563307 $194.47
OSM 2005120347 Jean R., Rosalee Darce & Roger 71271920003 $256.06
Anl!ervil
OSM 2005120346 Jean R., Rosalee Darce & Roger 71271920003 $175.52
Angervil
Reference Owner of Record Folio Lien Amount
OSM 2005060680 Robin Okolski 52399800008 $245.57
OSM 2006050116 Diane Muenze Gonzalez 68095560005 $187.72
OSM 2006070623 Josefina Mnnoz 00081120006 $2,000.00
OSM 2005120724 John C. & Sherri L. Morrison 24831??oo06 $170.97
OSM 2005040566 Edward & Rnth Dibene 65221360001 $132.79
OSM 2006050930 Charles & Donna Aylsworth 68047280003 $1,127.97
OSM 2005050079 Betty Shaffer, Tr. 67494560005 $163.47
OSM 2005051029 Ricbard Korman 53350040000 $163.47
OSM 2005051026 Richard Korman 53350040000 $163.47
OSM 2004040835 Miguel & Daima Fernandez 35775720004 $160.03
OSM 2005110434 Melquiades R. Buckow 38456440008 $210.10
OSM 2005060116 Carlos Perez & Saily Fuentes 62266200006 $157.14
OSM 2005080097 Ginger Gandy 35881360002 $1,868.97
OSM 2005040777 Dorene Clark 38332920008 $195.30
OSM 2006040775 Ricardo Ramirez & Sonia Garcia 60481080003 $1,948.73
OSM 2007030825 Wayne C. Womack 52700960003 $247.42
OSM 2006050747 Adan Hernandez 30683440002 $130.12
OSM 2006020827 Cresencio Martinez 60784200001 $170.66
OSM 2006020828 Cresencio Martinez 60784200001 $177.23
OSM 2005100215 Johnnie McSwain Thomas Est. 66930360003 $179.19
OSM 2005040921 Ashby & Denise Gilkenson 38336640009 $27,500.00
OSM 2005040747 Dave Mobley, Est. 77213480000 $115.19
OSM 2006120370 Melquiades Segura & Maria Segura 63856040002 $400.00
OSM- CO Anthony Cesa, Beverly & Joseph Frato 62570840000 $118.42
2005010252
OSM 2005080950 John & Joan Coffman 68045200001 $158.00
OSM 2006060894 Shirley Hnfford 63401960003 $129.58
16A?
Reference Owner of Record Folio Lien Amount
OSM - SO 145152 Juan Acevedo N/A $300.00
OSM 2006020265 Delius Adeka 62047120101 $6,339.28
OSM - CO Charles Aylsworth 62570840000 $606.95
2005020630
OSM 2005010536 Martin & Louisiana Mena 69654640006 $110.10
OSM 2004128483 Manuel Lamoglia 36312240001 $2,148.37
OSM 2006040689 Ricardo & Irma Montes 25577800721 $141.09
OSM 2006050687 Noe & Ivon Munoz 62150760005 $126.22
OSM 2005020112 Frank Lagonigro 62768200009 $140.05
OSM 2006070379 Jnlia Gomez 56405040004 $137.30
OSM 2006050760 Esteban & Rita Martinez 30680080009 $130.12
OSM 2006040832 Francis P. Lord 61780280008 $127.80
OSM - SO 152122 Patricia K. Sullivan N/A $50.00
OSM 2005040764 BFS Retail & Commercial Operation, 7441072003 $19,435.12
LLC
OSM 2005110329 Tereso Bautista & Emiliana Lopes 38045920007 $500.00
Vasquez
OSM-S0151737 Janet M. Clark N/A $250.00
OSM-S0152401 Edward J. Bauman N/A $50.00
OSM-SO 151709 Phyllis A. Emens N/A $250.00
OSM - SO 152418 Wilbert M. Beacham N/A $50.00
OSM 2006060894 Shirley Hufford 63401960003 $129.58
OSM 2005080446 Brenda Soto 52399800008 $350.00
TOTAL 87,918.96
16A
16A?
FISCAL IMPACT:
The only expense incurred by the County is the cost of recording the Releases and
Satisfactions, which is to be approximately $10.00 per release, totaling $650.00. Funds
are budgeted and available in the current fiscal year in the Code Enforcement budget.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT:
This request will have no impact on the County's Growth Management Plan.
LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
This request has been reviewed for legal sufficiency and has no outstanding legal
considerations.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Release and Satisfaction of Code
Enforcement Liens.
PREPARED BY: Marlene Stewart, Administrative Secretary - Code Enforcement
This instrument prepared by:
Jeff E. Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2BOO N, Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135125 OR: 4335 PG: 0419 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 1
03/04/2008 at 09:13AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
REC m 10,00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH !LOOR
BIT 8406
16A?
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Code
Enforcement Board dated February 28, 2007, a certified copy of which was
recorded on March 7, 2007, in O.R. Book 4193, Pages 2086-87, of the Public
Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property,
and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Jesus
and Laura Perez, has been discharged in full:
Jesus and Laura Perez
2942 Immokalee Drive
Immokalee, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
00082961963
$1 ,200
CEB Case No. 2006-45
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as
to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real
and personal property owned by Jesus and Laura Perez, and
consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this
d~~h daYOf~~U4rj
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
::I12;
,CHA MAN
By: ~ ~ Q(..
AtttIt II a QM~tY.Clerk
1111ft1turt 0111.
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Jeff E. Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135126 OR: 4335 PG: 0420 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:13AM OWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC FBi 10.00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16A?
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated August 10, 2006 a certified copy of which was recorded on, August 11,
2006 in O.R. Book 4087, Page 2469, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Jesus and Laura Perez, has been discharged in full.
Jesus and Laura Perez
2942 lmmokalee Drive
Immokalee, FI
Folio No.
Cost:
OSM No:
00075200000
$141.09
2006010158
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Jesus and Laura Perez, and consents to this lien being
di scharged of record.
Dated this df,1h day of J..t.brua,..~
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:~'I't~C:kL. By:
,~onl'
.
,CHAI
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
Jeff right
Assi t County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Jeff E, Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135127 OR: 4335 PG: 0421 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:13AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
REC FBE 10,00
cams 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROmCB 4TH FLOOR
BIT 8406
16A?
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated July 7, 2006 a certified copy of which was recorded on July 21, 2006, in
O.R. Book 4076, Page 0656, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the
following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Armando Yzaguirre, has been discharged in full.
Armando Yzaguirre
211 New Market Road E.
Naples, FL
Folio No.
Cost:
OSM No:
63865240000
$124.34
2006030904
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Armando Yzaguirre, and consents to this lien being
discharged of record.
Dated this J~tJ, day of ~h(LACl(~
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER OUNTY, ORillA
By: j) 11 L{ ~t" vOl:...
",' ,D uty Clerk
Attest IS to 11 ,
slQft1t.... 0lI1.
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
By:
~
Jeff . right
Assist t County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Jeff E. Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135128 OR: 4335 PG: 0422 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03/01/2008 at 09:13AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
REC m 10.00
COPIES 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICB ITH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated August 22, 2006 a certified copy of which was recorded on September 6,
2006, in OR Book 4101, Page 0178, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Francis, Paul, and Christopher Lombard, has been
discharged in full.
Francis, Paul, and Christopher Lombard
72591" Ave N.
Folio No.
Cost:
OSM No:
62710200002
$520.00
2006010540
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Francis, Paul, and Christopher Lombard, and consents
to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this rll.i-h day of J~(Uo.lt
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
, CHAIR N
By; ~ll ^t!~O.L. By:
- M...rt IS to ,~t~ Clerk
Itguwrt _1 ~
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
~.
-vt::
-
Jef . right
Assis nt County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Jeff E. Wright
Assistant County Auorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135129 OR: 4335 PG: 0423 ***
RECORDED in O!!ICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, !L
03/01/2008 at 09:13AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
REC !BE 10,00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROmCE ITH FLOOR
EXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated July 21,2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 2, 2006, in
O.R. Book 4081, Page 2674, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the
following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by David Esquivel, has been discharged in full.
David Esquivel
301 S. 6th Street
Immokalee, Fl 34143
Folio No.
Cost:
OSM No:
66881480003
$5,787.50
2005100286
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by David Esquivel, and consents to this lien being
discharged of record.
Dated this ~ ~ +h day of F.t.bruQ,('1
,2008.
A TrEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
::LL~:ct: .
, CHAIR~
By:llu.u. ~.L
~:Attest.S , ytlerk
S1Q11.t..... 001.
Approved as. to form and
legal sufficiency:
i&E:
Jeff right
Assist t County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
JeffE. Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135130 OR: 4335 PG: 0424 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:13AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC m 10.00
cams 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTKRomCB 4TH FLOOR
BIT 8406
16A?
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated February 28, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 19,
2005, in O.R. Book 3777, Page 4127, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Jason Mardis, has been discharged in full.
Jason Mardi s
4225 31st Place S.W.
Naples, FL
Folio No.
Cost:
OSM No;
36514360006
$6,601.25
2004110262
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Jason Mardis, and consents to this lien being
discharged of record.
Dated this ;216-/Jl day of (.UJfUa.'t.(
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COllIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
Atust IS to . f
atgqttn eM! h
(.
uiY Clerk
By:
, CHAIRM
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
Jeff right
Assi nt County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Jeff E. Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135131 OR: 4335 PG: 0425 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, lL
03/04/2008 at 09:13AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
REC m 10.00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTERomCE 4TH !LOOR
EIT 8406
16P?
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated July 6, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 10,2007, in
O.R. Book 4268, Pagers) 3962 and 3963, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by Amerada Hess Corp., has been discharged
in full.
Amerada Hess Corp.
11655 Collier Blvd
Naples, Fl
Folio No:
Cost:
OSM No:
35640720003
$179.41
2003-030309
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Amerada Hess Corp, and consents to this lien being
di scharged of record.
Dated this J ~#. day of P.u,ruary
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER CO TY, FL RillA
By: ~ ~(. D-l.JiO.Lr By:
ltun " to ~ tl\Clerk
110Rltllrt on!-
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
, CHAIRM
Jeff .
Assis
.
right
t County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Jeff E. Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135132 OR: 4335 PG: 0426 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:13AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
REC m 10,00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16A?
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated February 17, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on February 24,
2006, in O.R. Book 3988, Page 1002, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Jeffrey and Keith Basik, has been discharged in full.
Jeffrey and Keith Basik
195 Basi k Dri ve
Naples, FL
Folio No.
Cost:
OSMNo:
61510000021
$231.83
2005070501
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Jeffrey and Keith Basik, and consents to this lien being
discharged of record.
Dated this ;)lJo/il day of P'.Jlm.u.l.ry
,2008.
By: 1) Jj.J 1 ~D.(.
Attest as CII4 ~Clerk
119l'lture 0111-
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIERYJNTY, F ORillA
By: ,:}fJt-
A TIEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
right
t County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Jeff E, Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive. Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135133 OR: 4335 PG: 0427 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:13AM D~IGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC FBB 10,00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated, July 6, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 10,2007, in
O.R. Book 4268, Pagers) 3970, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against
the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Courthouse Shadows Consolidated Holdings, Inc, has been
discharged in full.
Courthouse Shadows Consolidated Holdings, Inc.
414 Booker Blvd
Immokalee, FL
Folio No.
Cost:
OSM No:
00126880007
$659.37
2006-110321
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Courthouse Shadows Consolidated Holdings, Inc, and
consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this c)l(p#1 day of F..uJru,fAry
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIERYUNTY, ORIDA.
By: .:JrJt
BY:~~S~~=~t.
Itllllltln ~l ~
,CHAIR V\N
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
JeffE. Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135134 OR: 4335 PG: 0428 ***
RECOROED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:13AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLBRK
REC m 10,00
cams 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated August 5, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 9, 2005,
in O.R. Book 3863, Page 2943, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against
the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Randall Latona, has been discharged in full.
Randall Latona
Grills of Naples
Naples, FL
Folio No.
Cost:
SO No:
N/A
$550.00
145163 and 145164
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Randall Latona, and consents to this lien being
discharged of record.
Dated this a(;-Ill day of f':......hru",'Y
, 2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER 7NTY, ORillA
By: ,J<fJt-
By:J)UH ~~().t.
Attest IS Cl\t )N:lerk
'S19'11tlltt Oftl'
, CHAIRM
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Jeff E. Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34] 04
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135137 OR: 4335 PG: 0431 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:18AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CL8RK
RBC PEE 10,00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBRO/FICB 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16A?
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated, July 6,2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 10,2007, in
OR Book 4268, Page(s) 3972 and 3973, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by Patricia Dolan, has been discharged in full.
Patricia Dolan
980 Auto Ranch Road #5
Naples, Fl
Folio No.
Cost:
OSM No:
00769680004
$197.99
2006-100007
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Patricia Dolan, and consents to this lien being
discharged of record.
Dated this Jfo-/ll day of tU('UfM1
,2008.
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Cieri< COLLT' RIDA
By: (\ 1'1J. Lo../ J 6AL~ uO.L. By: V---
Att:.t IS ~y'-:lerk
S lonaturt 011 J .
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Jeff E. Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135138 OR: 4335 PG: 0432 ***
RBCOROBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/200B at 09:18AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC FBB
COPIBS
10.00
\.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BIT 8406
16 h (
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated September 15, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on September
27, 2006, in O.R. Book 4112, Page 2547, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by Ted Barrett, Est., has been discharged in
full.
Ted Barrett, Est.
112 W. Pago Pago Drive
Naples, Fl
Folio No.
Cost:
OSM No:
52393600000
$132.45
2006070400
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Ted Barrett, Est., and consents to this lien being
discharged of record.
Dated this /)(p-lh day of Fibru.b.,Y
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER CO TY, FLORIDA
By: j)..kU.A_ 1t~..t.O~.'
Attest IS to t) Clerk
S lllfl.tur. onl .
By:
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Jeff E. Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135139 OR: 4335 PG: 0433 ***
RBCORDBD in OPPICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, PL
03/04/2008 at 09:18AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC m 10,00
cams 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROmCB 4TH PLOOR
BIT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated September 2, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on September
19, 2005, in O.R. Book 3892, Page 1596, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by Roberto Conti and Gerarda Daidone, has
been discharged in full.
Roberto Conti and Gerarda Daidone
437 Forest Hills Blvd
Naples, FL
Folio No.
Cost:
OSM No:
55052640007
$156.90
2005070279
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Roberto Conti and Gerarda Daidone, and consents to
this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this J(,o/h day of kiJJ fU.MY
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: 11.J111 ~lI~I"'o.(
Attest " Ch. t~Clerk
.igMtw't <MIl-
By:
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
.
This instrument prepared by:
Jeff E. Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135140 OR: 4335 PG: 0434 ***
RECORDED in O!!ICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, !L
03/04/1008 at 09:18AK DKIGHT E, 8ROCK, CLERK
REC!BE 10,00
cams 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THB BOARD
INTERO!!ICE 4TH !LOOR
BIT 8406
16A?
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated, July 6,2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 10,2007, in
O.R. Book 4268, Pagers) 3966 and 3967, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by John Emery, has been discharged in full.
John Emery
2815 Becca Avenue
Naples, FL
Folio No.
Cost:
OSM No:
81271201301
$384.57
2006-100318
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by John Emery, and consents to this lien being discharged
of record.
Dated this J~#I day of Fwru.fu'I
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER C NTY, ORillA
By: llu..u 2f 17~'~{)_( .
AtttJt IS eM ' y perk
11gltltlll"t 011]'
By:
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
~.
-~t
Jeff right ~ -
Assistant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
JetT E. Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 30 I
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135141 OR: 4335 PG: 0435 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:18AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC m 10,00
COPIBS 1,00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SA TISF ACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated, August 10, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on August II,
2006 in O.R. Book 4087, Page 2482, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Jeremiah Doran and Hasan Karagoz, has been
discharged in full.
Jeremiah Doran and Hasan Karagoz
806 Charlotte Street
Immokalee, FL
Folio No.
Cost:
OSM No:
63864160000
$151.54
2006020911
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Jeremiah Doran and Hasan Karagoz, and consents to
this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this ~lIlh day of r.J.bf"u."'Y
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: CD J J J ^L,~(J.(. By:
MttIt .,- to ~l_t~ Clerk
S1gMtln 0111'
,CHA
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
~~
3r
Jeff . right
Assis nt County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Jeff E, Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135142 OR: 4335 PG: 0436 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03/04/1008 at 09:18AM DWIGHT E, EROCK, CLERK
RBC m 10,00
COPIRS 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THB BOARD
INTEROmCB 4TH PLOOR
BXT 8406
16A?
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated, July 20,2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 10,2007,
in O.R. Book 4268, Page(s) 3977 and 3978 , of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by Marco Orbegoso, has been discharged in
full.
Marco Orbegoso
3891 Estey Avenue
Naples, FL
Folio No,
Cost:
OSM No:
26630080005
$681.18
2006-020362
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Marco Orbegoso, and consents to this lien being
discharged of record.
Dated this ;)14.#l day of ~(U.Q(V
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
':(i~
By: 11111.,( ~~~~\.P .l~O.t -By:
Mttst n to Clerk
S1!1ft.turf 0111.
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
right
t County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Jeff E. Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135143 OR: 4335 PG: 0437 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:18AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
REC !BE
coms
10.00
1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROmCE 4TH !LOOR
EIT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated March 17,2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 24, 2006,
in O.R. Book 4023, Page 0882, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against
the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Jesus Ayala, has been discharged in full.
Jesus Ayala
3144th Street S.
Immokalee, FL
Folio No.
Cost:
OSM No:
00127563307
$194.47
2005110778
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Jesus Ayala, and consents to this lien being discharged
of record.
Dated this dfl#t day of PLbrl4.a.ry
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUlER C TY, ORillA
By:J!w..l. ~,~n{~
,D uty Clerk
Attttt IS to CM 11"Mfl \
"9ft.hrt 00 1 .
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
By:
This instrument prepared hy:
Jeff E. Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive. Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135144 OR: 4335 PG: 0438 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:18AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC FiB 10,00
cams 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
EXT 8406
16A?
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated March 17, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 24, 2006,
in O.R. Book 4023, Page 0864, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against
the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Jean R. and Rosalee Darce & Roger Angervil, has been
di scharged in full.
Jean R. and Rosalee Darce & Roger Angervil
47 Royal Cove Drive
Naples, Fl
Folio No.
Cost:
OSM No:
71271920003
$256.06
2005120347
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Jean R. and Rosalee Darce & Roger Angervil and
consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this af4#l day of ~rull"Y
, 2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIERC7Ty,FL RillA
By: -:J'fJL
By: ~(J 1 J1 et J~.L.L () ( .
Attest 1$ C~ lclerk
,tgNtln .1"
, CHAIRM
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
right
County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Jeff E. Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135145 OR: 4335 PG: 0439 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:18AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
REC m 10,00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
EXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated March 17, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 24, 2006,
in O.R. Book 4023, Page 0865, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against
the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Jean R. and Rosalee Darce & Roger Angervil, has been
discharged in full.
Jean R. and Rosalee Darce & Roger Angervil
47 Royal Cove Drive
Naples, FI
Folio No.
Cost:
OSMNo:
71271920003
$175.52
2005120346
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Jean R. and Rosalee Darce & Roger Angervil and
consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this .;lc,-fh day of
FLbIUM,/
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER CO TY, FLORIDA
By: ~ 1', ~t~~:r~.t. By:
Attttt as to eN I..... .
119ft1tur't Oft).
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
, CHAIR
.
Jeff . right
Assis nt County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Jeff E, Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135146 OR: 4335 PG: 0440 ***
RiCORDiD in OFFICIAL RiCORDS of COLLIiR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:18AK DWIGHT i, BROCK, CLiRK
RiC FBi 10,00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLiRK TO THi BOARD
INTBROFFICi 4TH FLOOR
iXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated September 2, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on October 10,
2005, in OR Book 3907, Page 4042, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Robin Okolski, has been discharged in full.
Robin Okolski
145 Capri Blvd
Naples, FL
Folio No.
Cost:
OSM No:
52399800008
$245_57 total
2005060680
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Robin Okolski, and consents to this lien being
discharged of record.
Dated this ~(,-iJl day of f,d,(U4rt
,2008.
By:
attest .S
S1Ql\ltwrt 00 1 .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLL~!UN~TY' F ORillA
By: ..:JrJ1-
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
,
right
nt County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135147 OR: 4335 PG: 0441 ***
RHCORDHD in OFFICIAL RHCORDS of COLLIHR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:26AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC m 10,00
COPIBS 1,00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certiJY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated September I, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on September
12, 2006, in O.R. Book 4104, Page 1071, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by Diane Muenze Gonzalez, has been
discharged in full:
Diane Muenze Gonzalez
3348 Bolero Way
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
68095560005
$187.72
OSM Case No. 2006050116
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Diane Muenze Gonzalez, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this ;]f4-1J'1 day of ~(u(),ri
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By ~AJ
- ~MW
BY:~ fI~O.t.
I IS , yt::lerk
11l1ftlture 011 h
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Dri ve
Naples, Florida 34 J 04
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135148 OR: 4335 PG: 0442 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:16AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CL8RK
RBC m 10.00
COPIBS 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BIT 8406
16t. !
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certiJy that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated June 15,2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on October 15,2007,
in O.R. Book 4292, Pages 0947-0948, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Josefina Munoz, has been discharged in full:
Josefina Munoz
3026 Immokalee Drive
Immokalee, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
00081120006
$2,000.00
OSM Case No. 2006-070623
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Josefina Munoz, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this ~li4h day of r"u'(II.a.ry
, 2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER /NTY, FLORIDA.
By: J~
, CHAIRM
By:jllJH AA.lL~.(/~O_l.
M4._ 0 , D uty Clerk
....w.t IS to ell<< I,.... ,
"tIItart 0111.
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135149 OR: 4335 PG: 0443 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:26AM DWIGHT B. 8ROCK, CLBRK
RBC m 10,00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BIT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated April 7, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 24, 2006, in
O.R. Book 4023, Page 0895, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the
following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by John C. and Sherri L. Morrison, has been discharged in full:
John C. and Sherri L. Morrison
1280 Embassy Ln
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
2483]000006
$]70.97
OSM Case No. 2005]20724
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
John C. and Sherri L. Morrison, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this a {g +1. day of fl.bil.A,ary
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
::LLVORIDA.
~
By:]J.J1JL ~.O(r
Attest as to t)iClerk
110111t.".. 001-
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135150 OR: 4335 PG: 0444 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:26AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC FBB 10,00
COPIBS 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Magistrate dated September 21, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on October
15,2007, in O.R. Book 4292, Pages 0766-0767, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by Edward Dibene and Ruth Dibene, has been
discharged in full:
Edward Dibene and Ruth Dibene
124 Coral Vine Drive
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
65221360001
$132.79
OSM Case No. 2005-040566
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Edward Dibene and Ruth Dibene, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this d fJ -/JI day of p...t.bru. ary
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: lLuLI tt/:i;;lt1,1J.<- .
Attest as to e I, , ,y Clerk
"gHturt 011 h
By:
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples. Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135151 OR: 4335 PG: 0445 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:26AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC m
coms
10,00
1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBRO!FICB 4TH !LOOR
BXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated August 10, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 11,
2006, in O.R. Book 4087, Page 2483, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Charles and Donna Aylsworth, has been discharged
in full:
Charles and Donna Aylsworth
2853 Poinciana Dr
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
68047280003
$1,127.97
OSM Case No. 2006050930
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Charles and Donna Aylsworth, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this :;~~ day of (-J./hruQt y
,2008.
By:.o..uv.. 1L1~ J& QI:".
Att.st ' puty Clerk
I 'glial:: ~ I ;1It '!"11M S
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: J Ai
. J~ -'-~~~
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135152 OR: 4335 PG: 0446 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, PL
03/01/2008 at 09:26AM DWIGHT 8. 8ROCK, CLERK
REC FBi 10,00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE ITH FLOOR
EIT 8106
16A?
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated August 5, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 9, 2005,
in O.R. Book 3863, Page 2934, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against
the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Betty Shaffer TR, has been discharged in full:
Betty Shaffer TR
4620 Outer Dr
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
67494560005
$163.47
OSM Case No. 2005050079
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Betty Shaffer TR, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this <<(,tJ1 day of FV;(().u('1
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: J1IJJ A ~ I~ I() C. .
Attest ,; to c' sty Clerk
"911'turt 0Il1 ~
By:
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135153 OR: 4335 PG: 0447 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/01/2008 at 09:26AM DWIGHT 8, 8ROCK, CLBRK
RBC FEE 10,00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROllICB ITH ILOOR
BXT 8106
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated August 5, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 9, 2005,
in OR Book 3863, Page 2938, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against
the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Richard Korman, has been discharged in full:
Richard Korman
2960 Lunar St
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
53350040000
$163.47
OSM Case No. 2005051029
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Richard Korman, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this .;1",,11 day of Wf/..l(A'Y
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHTE. BROCK, Clerk
,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: ll.uu 1f. ':Jf-.... ().{ .
Attest as to. uty Clerk
119ft1bn 0Il1.
By:
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135154 OR: 4335 PG: 0448 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/1008 at 09:16AK DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC m
COPIBS
10,00
1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16A?
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated August 5, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 9, 2005,
in O.R. Book 3863, Page 2940, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against
the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Richard Korman, has been discharged in full:
Richard Korman
2960 Lunar St
Naples, Florida
Folio No,:
Cost:
Reference:
53350040000
$163.47
OSM Case No. 2005051026
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Richard Korman, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this Jf.#l day of Yl--bru..ary
,2008.
A TIEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER rTY, F ORIDA
By: :J'fJJ--
By: (lJJU t~ J..- Ok.-
Attest IS to I \lfY Clerk
111Jll1ture 0.11'
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
~
Assistant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135155 OR: 4335 PG: 0449 ***
RiCORDiD in OFFICIAL RiCORDS of COLLIiR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:26AM DWIGHT i, BROCK, CLiRK
RBC FBi 10,00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICi 4TH FLOOR
BIT 8406
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
16A7
~.
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated May 19, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on June 5, 2006, in
O.R. Book 4049, Page 1848, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the
following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Miquel and Daima Fernandez, has been discharged in full:
Miquel and Daima Fernandez
1900 42nd St SW
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
35775720004
$160.03
OSM Case No. 2004040835
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Miquel and Daima Fernandez, and consents to this lien being discharged ofrecord.
Dated this ~f.J-M day of wrL-lary
,2008.
By: 1.1.u.tt ALtklUJ..(k_
Atte . -6 , rj~ty Clerk
It as to Chatnlel ,
.'gn.twe OIth
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
i~~
By:
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
~
Assistant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135156 OR: 4335 PG: 0450 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03/04/1008 at 09:16AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
REC m 10,00
COPIBS 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
BIT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Magistrate dated August 17, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on September
13,2007, in OR Book 4281, Pages 0539-0540, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by Melquiades R. Buckow, has been
discharged in full:
Melquiades R. Buckow
6461 Bottlebrush Lane
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
38456440008
$210.10
OSM Case No. 2005-110434
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Melquiades R. Buckow, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this J(P-lll day of r..l..-bru.o.ry
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E, BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By;J)..lJJ1 ~~ .n.t.
Attest 1$ to '" I ul' Clerk
ItpatlIre 0111'
By:
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
J'ff~
Assistant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135158 OR: 4335 PG: 0452 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:30AK DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC FBi 10,00
COPlES 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated July 15, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on July 21, 2005, in
O.R. Book 3850, Page 0401, ofthe Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the
following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Carlos Perez & Saily Fuentes, has been discharged in full:
Carlos Perez & Saily Fuentes
5434 Texas Avenue
Naples, Florida
Folio No,;
Cost:
Reference:
62266200006
$157.14
OSM Case No. 2005060116
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Carlos Perez & Saily Fuentes, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this ;)C.th day of iQ,brt.Aaf1
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E, BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
::~L~
By:lUu..L ~ L}.t
attett &$ to <b.11il tl' Clerk
.t9ftlturt (MIl"
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
~~
- ::fC:,
Jeff righ
Assistant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135159 OR: 4335 PG: 0453 ***
RECORDED in OPPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, PL
03/01/1008 at 09:30AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
REC m 10,00
cams 1,00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFPICE 4TH PLOOR
EXT 8106
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated December 16,2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on January 6,
2006, in O.R. Book 3961, Page 0779, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Ginger Gandy, has been discharged in full:
Ginger Gandy
1993 41 st Ter SW
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
35881360002
$1,868.97
OSM Case No. 2005080097
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Ginger Gandy, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this ;2 " ~ day of _PLb fuar y
,2008.
By: _l\.t.u L ~ Q c.
Attest ... to t ~ Clerk
st9l'Iturt 0111-
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER -:~TY' F ORIDA.
By: :J'fJ1--
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135160 OR: 4335 PG: 0454 ***
RBCORDBD in OPPICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, PL
03/04/2008 at 09:30AM DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLBRK
RBC m 10.00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROPPICB 4TH PLOOR
BIT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated July I, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on July 6, 2005, in
O.R. Book 3837, Page 0581, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the
following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Dorene Clark, has been discharged in full:
Dorene Clark
6171 Green Blvd
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
38332920008
$195.30
OSM Case No. 2005040777
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Dorene Clark, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this ~ it {h day of P..t..h rWJ(Y
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
--Lk~
By: Jlll' 1 !:t 11 ~ J I rt\J .c.. .
Attest .1 to 1"'" uty Clerk
I igllltw't 0111.
By:
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
~.
, ~
Jeff ght '
Assist t County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135161 OR: 4335 PG: 0455 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03/04/1008 at 09:30AN DWIGHT E, EROCK, CLERK
REC FEE 10,00
COPIES 1,00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROPFICB 4TH PLOOR
BXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated August 10, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on August II,
2006, in O.R. Book 4087, Page 2481, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Ricardo Ramirez & Sonia Garcia, has been
discharged in full:
Ricardo Ramirez & Sonia Garcia
4106 Mowhawk PI
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
60481080003
$1,948.73
OSM Case No, 2006040775
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Ricardo Ramirez & Sonia Garcia, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this d&.fh day of P.JJruary
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:[LuJi ~n(
Attest as t:s Clerk
Sigut.-. 0111.
By;
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
.
Jeff ight
Assis ant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403.2496
*** 4135162 OR: 4335 PG: 0456 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:30AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC m 10,00
COPIES 1,00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THE BOARD
INTBROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
BIT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Magistrate dated September 21, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on October
15,2007, in O.R. Book 4292, Pages 0741-0742, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by Wayne C. Womack, has been discharged in
full:
Wayne C. Womack
2960 Van Buren A venue
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
52700960003
$247.42
OSM Case No. 2007-030825
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Wayne C. Womack, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this d~-l~ day of f1.JJrua.,.y
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By ;i, Ai .
~~
By:Cl.UH "V.JQL
Atun as to , ,puty Clerk
,'!llIlt..n OAl-
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
,
right
t County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135163 OR: 4335 PG: 0457 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:30AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLBRK
REC FEE 10,00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
BIT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated August 22, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on September 6,
2006, in O.R. Book 4101, Page 0171, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Adan Hernandez, has been discharged in full:
Adan Hernandez
1412 Peach St
Immokalee, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
30683440002
$130.12
OSM Case No. 2006050747
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Adan Hernandez, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this JiJ-Ih day of F.tJJrUQ.fY
,2008.
By: --'i.b u ~~ (l <..
....,_.... " D uty Clerk ,
ft....~ .S to tnli \
It Q11lt.".t 0111.
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
By;
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135164 OR: 4335 PG: 0458 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/01/2008 at 09:30AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC m 10,00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROmCB ITH FLOOR
BXT 8106
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated May 5, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on May II, 2006, in
O.R. Book 4035, Pages 0416-0417, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Cresencio Martinez, has been discharged in full:
Cresencio Martinez
5257 Cypress Ln
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
60784200001
$170.66
OSM Case No. 2006020827
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Cresencio Martinez, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this a(,th day of J~ru.a(y
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOA!ill OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
::LIIY' nOlliOA
h~
By:fulJl . ~.(.
Attest as to 1 ~y Clerk
'111Jftltlrt 0CI1.
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34\ 04
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135165 OR: 4335 PG: 0459 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS 01 COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03/0412008 at 09:30AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
REC PEE 10,00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROmCE 4TH nOOR
EXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated May 5, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on May 11, 2006, in
OR Book 4035, Pages 0418-0419, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Cresencio Martinez, has been discharged in full:
Cresencio Martinez
5257 Cypress Ln
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
60784200001
$177.23
OSM Case No. 2006020828
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Cresencio Martinez, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this ()(,.J.il day of
~b(l.I.o.ry
,2008.
By:
Atttlt .s Ch4
.tgqturt GIll ~
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER JUNTY, F ORIDA.
By: :J1Jt.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
(
Jeff
Assis
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples. Florida 34] 04
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135166 OR: 4335 PG: 0460 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COURTY, FL
03/04/1008 at 09:30AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC m 10,00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
IRTBROmCB 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16 i!-,
fi/
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated February 17, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on February 24,
2006, in O.R. Book 3988, Page 0987, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Johnnie McSwain Thomas Est., c/o Lucy R. Riley,
has been discharged in full:
Johnnie McSwain Thomas Est., c/o Lucy R. Riley
405 Carver St
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
66930360003
$179.19
OSM Case No. 2005100215
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Johnnie McSwain Thomas Est., c/o Lucy R. Riley, and consents to this lien being
discharged of record.
Dated this Jltt/) day of r.tJJru.at"i
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER CO TY, FLORIDA
, CHAIRMA
By: ^. 'Ll "~ J ~ tl, 0-(. By:
AU;;t IS to , . . ui Clerk
"llM~ OIl!.
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
t
ri t
tant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135167 OR: 4335 PG: 0461 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03/04/1008 at 09:30AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLBRK
REC!BE 10,00
COPIBS 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
EIT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certil)- that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated January 19, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on February 5,
2007, in O.R. Book 4178, Pages 2584-2585, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by Ashby and Denise Gilkeson, has been
discharged in full:
Ashby and Denise Gilkeson
5960 Green Blvd
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference;
38336640009
$27,500.00
OSM Case No. 2005-040921
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Ashby and Denise Gilkeson, and consents to this lien being discharged ofrecord.
Dated this dr,oVl day of ~(lJ.a.(y
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER CO TY, FLORIDA
By: ll..u..u.' ~n(.
ataI\ as to ,puty Clerk
.t~ 011'"
By:
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
t
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135168 OR: 4335 PG: 0462 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/1008 at 09:36AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC FEE 10.00
COPIBS 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16A7
,:!
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated June 3, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on July 6, 2005, in
OR Book 3837, Page 0553, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the
following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Dave Mobley Est., has been discharged in full:
Dave Mobley Est.
157 4th Street
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
77213480000
$115.19
OSM Case No. 2005040747
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Dave Mobley Est., and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this d~ ill day of F' -v:>rua.fY
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
, CHAIRM
By:_~.. ~~C(r
...., ,-- 't" ,D uty Clerk
....wt1 at to ~ I..... ,
. flNtllrt.on I .
By:
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
~
Jeff ght
Assis t County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 341 04
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135169 OR: 4335 PG: 0463 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:36AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
REC PEE 10,00
COFIES 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE EOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
BIT 8406
16A?
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certiJY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Magistrate dated July 6, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 10,
2007, in O.R. Book 4268, Pages 3964-3965, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by Melquiades Segura and Maria Segura, has
been discharged in full:
Melquiades Segura and Maria Segura
612 Jefferson Avenue W
Immokalee, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
63856040002
$400.00
OSM Case No. 2006-120370
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Melquiades Segura and Maria Segura, and consents to
this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this at,4h day of uhruary
,2008.
ATTEST: .
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: J Al
.J()1 ~~~
By: J)..uu ~ ~ ro .'-~
Atust IS to I ~ty Clerk
11gqt.... ORl-
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
~
Jef W .ght
Assis ant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135170 OR: 4335 PG: 0464 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:36AM DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLBRK
RBC m 10,00
COPIBS 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BiT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated April 20, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 26, 2005, in
O.R. Book 3783, Page 0764, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the
following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Anthony Cesa, Beverly Frato and Joseph Frato, has been
discharged in full:
Anthony Cesa, Beverly Frato, and Joseph Frato
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
nla
$118.42
OSM Case No. CO# 2005010252
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Anthony Cesa, Beverly Frato and Joseph Frato, and
consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this O?(,f~ day of y-dJ fuo.y y
,2008.
ATTEST:. '. .
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER /TY, FLORIDA
BY~~
, CHAIRMif
By: D.lH..I '~o.(.
Atttlt IS to 1 . up Clerk
.ignature (0)-
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
Jeff ht
Assist t County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135171 OR: 4335 PG: 0465 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:36AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC m 10,00
COPIRS 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROmCB 4TH FLOOR
BIT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Magistrate dated September 7, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on
September 26, 2007, in O.R. Book 4285, Pages 1768-1769, of the Public Records of
Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real
and personal property located in Collier County, owned by John Coffman and Joan
Coffman, has been discharged in full:
John Coffman and Joan Coffman
3508 Dorado Way
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
68045200001
$158.00
OSM Case No. 2005-080950
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
John Coffman and Joan Coffman, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this JiI-Ift day of P'.dJru.ary
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
.
B:~~ to ct~~C~kL. By:
"gn.turt 0111-
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
, CHAIRM
~
Jef ight
Assis ant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135172 OR: 4335 PG: 0466 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR CODNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:36AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC m 10.00
COPIBS 1,00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated August 22, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on September 6,
2006, in O.R. Book 4101, Pages 0169-0170, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by Shirley Hufford, has been discharged in
full:
Shirley Hufford
1058 Elrado St
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
63401960003
$129.58
OSM Case No. 2006060894
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Shirley Hufford, and consents to this lien being
discharged of record.
Dated this dlJ.JJ.. day of ...flJ, (U AI V
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
11"'un OIll
By:
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
~
Jeff ght
Assist t County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135173 OR: 4335 PG: 0467 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03/01/2008 at 09:36AK DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
REC FBi 10,00
COPIES 1,00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE lTH FLOOR
EXT 8106
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated May 6, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on May 13, 2005, in
O.R. Book 3797, Page 3842, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the
following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Juan Acevedo, has been discharged in full:
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
n/a
$300.00
OSM Case No. SO 145152
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Juan Acevedo, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this ;JuJr. day of FtJ,ru."'1
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER C,NTY, FLORIDA .
By: J7R.-
,CHAI
By:fulLl ~ Q.{.
Mttst as' to, ,'uty Clerk
"plIt"" Oft 1 ·
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34] 04
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135174 OR: 4335 PG: 0468 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
OJ/04/2008 at 09:J6AK DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC m 10.00
coms 1,00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated April 6, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 19, 2007, in
O.R. Book 4215, Pages 4130-4131, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Delius Adeka, has been discharged in full:
Delius Adeka
5314 McCarty Street
Naples, FL
Folio No,:
Cost:
Reference:
62047120101
$6,339.28
OSM Case No. 2006-020265
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Delius Adeka, and consents to this lien being discharged ofrecord,
Dated this ~t,~~ day of ~{(.(4(Y
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER /TY, F ORIDA
By: J~
By: Jl.UH lcf '~~ J{A.()L
. , puty Clerk
Attest IS to Ch.11 rNll ,
., g11ltUl"t 00 1 .
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency;
~
Je 'gH
Assis ant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135175 OR: 4335 PG: 0469 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/01/2008 at 09:36AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC m 10,00
coms 1,00
Retn:
CL8RK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB lTH FLOOR
BIT 8106
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated April I, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 26, 2005, in
OR Book 3783, Page 0757, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the
following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Charles Aylsworth, has been discharged in full:
Charles Aylsworth
2853 Poinciana Drive
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
62570840000
$606.95
OSM Case No. CO# 2005020630
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Charles Aylsworth, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this Jill~ day of f'.drua.ry
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER C UNTY, FLORIDA
,CHAI
By: 1)1111 ~ IJ;i,U L OL .
MUst a, tol ,\ty Clerk
11gNtur. 0f11.
By:
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135176 OR: 4335 PG: 0470 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/01/1008 at 09:36AM DWIGHT 8, 8ROCK, CL8RK
RBC m 10.00
COPI8S 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROmCB ITH FLOOR
BIT 8106
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated May 6, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on May 13, 2005, in
O.R. Book 3797, Page 3869, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the
following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Martin and Louisiana Mena, has been discharged in full:
Martin and Louisiana Mena
2572 River Reach Drive
Naples, FL
Folio No.;
Cost:
Reference:
69654640006
$110.10
OSM Case No, 2005010536
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Martin and Louisiana Mena, and consents to this lien
being discharged of record.
Dated this a4t~ day of Kt,bru,afY
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:f)JlU ~~O.{-
Atttst as , Clerk
119l11t"" OIl .
.
By:
,CHAI
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
'ght
t County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135177 OR: 4335 PG: 0471 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:36AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC FBi 10,00
COPIES 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated June 2, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on July 6, 2005, in
O.R. Book 3837, Page 0557, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the
following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Manuel Lamoglia, has been discharged in full:
Manuel Lamoglia
2268 Hunter Blvd
Naples, FL
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
36312240001
$2,148.37
OSM Case No. 2004120483
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Manuel Lamoglia, and consents to this lien being
discharged of record.
Dated this JlJ#1 day of F.t.hrutJ.1
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E.BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLl7Y' FL RlDA
.By:
By: _()...L.u..l ~ () L
Ilttett IS to ! ~ Clerk
li...t..... 0(11-
, CHAIRMA
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
r' ht
t County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135179 OR: 4335 PG: 0473 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
OJ/04/1008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC FBB 10,00
coms 1,00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BIT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated August 10, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on August II,
2006, in O.R. Book 4087, Pages 2477-2478, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by Ricardo and Irma Montes, has been
discharged in full:
Ricardo and Irma Montes
3504 Carson Lakes Circle
Naples, FL
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
25577800721
$141.09
OSM Case No. 2006040689
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Ricardo and Irma Montes, and consents to this lien
being discharged of record.
Dated this ;;;~ #I day of r-i.-bruary
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER /TY, F ORIDA.
By: Jr'Jt-
, CHAIRMAN
BY:~, ~~'~I4"Or...
,.1 - ,
.t~ ~ ,4T t} flerk
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
t
ht
County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135180 OR: 4335 PG: 0474 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
0310412008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC FEE 10,00
COPIES 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THB BOARD
INTEROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BIT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated August 22, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on September 6,
2006, in OR Book 4101, Page 0173, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Noe and Ivon Munoz, has been discharged in full:
Noe and Ivon Munoz
5317 Warren St
Naples, FL
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
62150760005
$126.22
OSM Case No. 2006050687
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Noe and Ivon Munoz, and consents to this lien being
discharged of record.
Dated this a(,ih day of F~f'lAQ.f'Ij
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER ymTY, F ORIDA.
By: ,:Jf)1.--
By: Cl.u II ~ I,Q.(.
! Malt " to t,,~,r1i1#1\uty Clerk
\ at...turt 001.
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
. ht
t County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135181 OR: 4335 PG: 0475 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03/04/200S at 09:44AK DWIGHT E, EROCK, CLERK
REC m 10.00
COPIES I.OO
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFPlCE 4TH FLOOR
EXTS406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated September 22, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on September
23, 2005, in O.R. Book 3896, Page 1737, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by Frank Lagonigro, has been discharged in
full:
Frank Lagonigro
724 96th Ave N
Naples, FL
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
62768200009
$140.05
OSM Case No. 2005020112
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Frank Lagonigro, and consents to this lien being
discharged of record.
Dated this J~ II> day of ~br(,.u.lt"y
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
::LLlliIl: .
, CHAIRMAIf'
By:lY.LtA ~((I~ to!.....
Attest as to C f'1IIit uty Clerk
.'...tan CMI I ·
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
~~
J ef right
Assistant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135182 OR: 4335 PG: 0476 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:44AK DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC FBB 10.00
COFIBS 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16A?
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated October 6, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on November 3,
2006, in O.R. Book 4132, Pages 1726-1727, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by Julia Gomez, has been discharged in full:
Julia Gomez
419 Jones St
Immokalee, FL
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
56405040004
$137.30
OSM Case No. 2006070379
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Julia Gomez, and consents to this lien being discharged
of record.
Dated this ;)lI-lil day of F..<.,bruary
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER rTY, FLORIDA .
By: .J~ -1/ .
~
By:_().u.,u ~O(
IIttUt It to ChQ1~uty Clerk
11gMtlll"f 01\1.
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135183 OR: 4335 PG: 0477 ***
RECOROED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
OJ/04/1008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
REC FBB 10,00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
EXT 840&
iA7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated August 10, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 11,
2006, in O.R. Book 4087, Page 2484, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Esteban and Rita Martinez, has been discharged in
full:
Esteban and Rita Martinez
1401 Papaya St
Immokalee, FL
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
30680080009
$130.12
OSM Case No. 2006050760
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Esteban and Rita Martinez, and consents to this lien
being discharged of record,
Datedthis J(,+h day of Flbru,ary
,2008,
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
::LLTt:A.
, CHAIRM~
By: _llu..u t;f,.:;e,J-c.,O.(-
Attest as to Ch )mty Clerk
11g1'1ltlll't 0111,
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135184 OR: 4335 PG: 0478 ***
RECORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:44AK DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC FBB 10,00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
~6A?
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated July 7, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on July 21, 2006, in
O.R. Book 4076, Pages 0686-0687, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Francis P. Lord, has been discharged in full:
Francis P. Lord
313 9 Caledonia Avenue
Naples, FL
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
61780280008
$127.80
OSM Case No. 2006040832
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Francis P. Lord, and consents to this lien being
discharged of record.
Dated this ~(, PI day of fih (1.1 ary
,2008.
By: fLu{J~().t
Mttlt IS -to & I 1f:y Clerk
\St...turt 001.
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIERYUNTY, F ORIDA.
. By; Jf'Jt
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK; Clerk
.
Je~~
Assis nt County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34] 04
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135185 OR: 4335 PG: 0479 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:44AM D~IGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
REC !BE 10.00
COPIES 1,00
Retn:
CLERK TO THB BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
EIT 8406
16A?
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated March 3, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on March 20, 2006,
in O.R. Book 4001, Page 0298, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against
the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Patricia K. Sullivan, has been discharged in full:
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
n/a
$50.00
OSM Case No. SO 152122
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Patricia K. Sullivan, and consents to this lien being
discharged of record.
Dated this J(,I-}-' day of r.t.bru.(.uy
,2008.
By: llll (.A t'~ L. O.{
Attest as to 1 ~y Clerk
.iglltn Clll h
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By i AI
- ~~
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
t
t County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Jeff E. Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, florida 34104
(239) 213-2939
*** 4135186 OR: 4335 PG: 0480 ***
RBCORDED in OPPICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, PL
03/01/1008 at 09:11AM DWIGHT 8, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC PBB
coms
10.00
1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROmCB ITH PLOOR
BIT 8106
, 6A7
j
!I!l!
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated January 19, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on February 5,
2007, in O,R. Book 4178, Page 2576 and 2577, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by BFS Retail and Commercial Operation,
LLC, has been discharged in full.
Folio No.
Cost:
OSM No:
74410720003
$19,435,12
2005-040764
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by BFS Retail and Commercial Operation, and consents to
this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this a~fh day of nbruCiI'Y
,2008.
BY:~
Attest as
"glIItln 01
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLL7UNTY, ORillA
By: --." lJL--
A TrEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
, CHAIR AN
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
"
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135187 OR: 4335 PG: 0481 ***
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/04/2008 at 09:44AK DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC m 10,00
COPIBS 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated March 2, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on March 20, 2007,
in O.R. Book 4199, Pages 1612-1613, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Tereso Bautista and Emiliana Lopes Vasquez, has
been discharged in full:
T ereso Bautista and Emiliana Lopes Vasquez
3545 23rd Avenue SW
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
38045920007
$500.00
OSM Case No. 2005-110329
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Tereso Bautista and Emiliana Lopes Vasquez, and consents to this lien being discharged
of record.
Dated this ~(,+h day of (i.brua.,y
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
::L7~A.
, CHAIRM~
By: ~ ~O..c...
MUIt. t' to C I, ty Clerk
.~ Qlll.
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
J ff right
As . tant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples. Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135188 OR: 4335 PG: 0482 ***
RBCORDBD in OIIICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, IL
03/04/1008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC !BE 10,00
coms 1,00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBRomCB 4TH FLOOR
BIT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated March 3, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on March 20, 2006,
in O.R, Book 4001, Page 0294, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against
the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Janet M. Clark, has been discharged in full:
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
n/a
$250.00
OSM Case No. SO 151737
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Janet M. Clark, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this d(,th day of P-UJrwuy
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER C UNTY, FLORIDA
.
By:1Yw ~O(-
'~ttest as to I , dty Clerk
S19ft.~ 0111-
By:
,CHAI
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135189 OR: 4335 PG: 0483 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03/04/1008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
REC PEE 10.00
COPIES 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
EXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated March 3, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on March 20,2006,
in O.R. Book 4001, Page 0296, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against
the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Edward J. Bauman, has been discharged in full:
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
n/a
$50.00
OSM Case No. SO 152401
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Edward J. Bauman, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this 0l~#J day of P,u,rUtI('/
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIE7TY, FLORIDA .
By: ''i':JL-----.4 .. . - .
~
By: _lttu 1 ~ ~ O. C-.
. ,utv Clerk
Attnt as to h<<l "S
,........ oAl ~
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
ight
ant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135190 OR: 4335 PG: 0484 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER CODNTY, FL
03/04/1008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
REC PEE 10.00
COPIES 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROmCE 4TH FLOOR
EIT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated March 3,2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on March 20, 2006,
in O.R. Book 4001, Page 0295, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against
the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Phyllis A. Emens, has been discharged in full:
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
n/a
$250.00
OSM Case No. SO 151709
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Phyllis A. Emens, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this d(,#l day of ~(u.f.uy
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COlL~O~
By::JfjL.---
, CHAI AN
By: (Lu.-u. ~r:u.-'-tO.t.
AttJlt as to I ptlty Clerk
Ii on.turt 001.
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135191 OR: 4335 PG: 0485 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03/04/1008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLBRK
REC PEE 10.00
COPIES 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
EXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated March 3, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on March 20, 2006,
in O.R. Book 4001, Page 0293, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against
the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in
Collier County, owned by Wilbert M. Beacham, has been discharged in full:
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
n/a
$50.00
OSM Case No. SO 152418
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Wilbert M. Beacham, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this J~~ day of WrutAfY
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER crTY, F ORIDA .
By: 1<rn-
BY~~U~~'\O ~~~l~~-
stlJMtlII't 001.
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
,
This instrument prepared by:
Arlene Harper
Administrative Secretary
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 403-2496
*** 4135192 OR: 4335 PG: 0486 ***
RBCORDED in OFPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, PL
03/04/1008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
REC PEE 10.00
COPIES 1,00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTERomCE 4TH FLOOR
BXT 8406
16A7
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated August 22, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on September 6,
2006, in O.R. Book 4101, Pages 0169-0170, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by Shirley Hufford, has been discharged in
full:
Shirley Hufford
1058 Elrado St
Naples, Florida
Folio No.:
Cost:
Reference:
63401960003
$129.58
OSM Case No. 2006060894
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Shirley Hufford, and consents to this lien being
discharged of record.
Dated this J~ 41\ day of F..J.lJ rua.(t
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
.
By: CluM' ~O.(. By:
MttI\- as .\f) ~ Clerk
ItgHturt 00 i ·
, CHAIRM
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
~.~
Jeff r ght
Assis t County Attorney
*** 4135193 OR: 4335 PG: 0487 ***
RECORDED in OPPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, PL
03/04/1008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLBRK
REC m 10.00
COPIES 1.00
This instrument prepared by:
Jerr E. Wright
Assistant County Attorney
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301
Naples, F]orida 34104
(239) 2]3-2939
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROmCE 4TH FLOOR
EIT 8406
16A?
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special
Master dated April 6, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 19,2007, in
OR Book 4215, Page 4144 and 4145, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property
located in Collier County, owned by Brenda Soto, has been discharged in full.
Brenda Soto
5410 Catts Street
Naples, FL
Folio No.
Cost:
OSM No:
52399800008
$350.00
2005-080446
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the
whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal
property owned by Brenda Soto, and consents to this lien being discharged
of record.
Dated this J~~ day of r.u,ru.o,fY
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ByJLu.,1l ~~Ii!dl' Q.C. By:
Attllt as to ru uty Clerk
S1Q11.tUl't 001' .
.
,CH AN
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
~
Assistant County Attorney
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 A
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 10
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item,)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
exee tion of the Chairman's si nature, draw a line thrau h routin lines #1 thrau h #4, com lete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routin order
1.
2.
n
~'.;;J -0
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records
Clerk of Court's Office
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chaimlan's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff J
Contact
Agenda Date Item was
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
I\~ I-+O\>\~l.OoQ:[ t1
l..lu.le ~
~O LvlloN.
Phonc Number
x S t5"1-
le./J, - III
I
Agenda Item Number
OB,t1
Number of Original
Documents Attached
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/ A" in the Not Applicab]e column, whichevcr is Yes N/A (Not
appropriate. (Initial) Applicable)
1. Original document has been signedlinitialed for lega] sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, /'
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Officc and signature pages from
contracts, agreements. etc. that have bcen fully executed by all patties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and possibly State Officials.)
2. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's -
Office and all other parties except the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
3. The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the ,-
document or the final negotiated contract date whichcver is applicable.
4. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's ,./
signature and initials are required.
5. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Fi]son in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. ~
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines!
6. The document was approved by the BCC on :J.~"'- D'il (enter date) and all changes N/A is not
made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The ~ an option for
County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan~es, if applicable. line 6.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
I: forms! County forms/ Bee forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
MEMORANDUM
Date:
March 4, 2008
To:
John Houldsworth, Senior Engineer
Engineering Services Department
From:
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Resolution 2008-42
Enclosed please find one copy of the document as referenced above
(Agenda Items # 16AI0), approved by the Board of County
Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008.
If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me
at 252-8411.
Thank you.
Enclosure
16Al0
16A10
RESOLUTION NO. 08-E-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA AUTHORIZING FINAL
ACCEPTANCE OF CERTAIN ROADWAY AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN MEDITERRA
PARCEL 103, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 34,
PAGES 26 THROUGH 29; RELEASE OF THE
MAINTENANCE SECURITY; AND
ACCEPTANCE OF THE MAINTENANCE
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT
REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE
VILLORESI NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on
March 14,2000 approved the plat of Mediterra Parcel 103 for recording; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway and
drainage improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications as
required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 04-41, as
amended); and
WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway and
drainage improvements and release of his maintenance security; and
WHEREAS, the Engineering and Environmental Services Department has
inspected the roadway and drainage improvements, and is recommending acceptance of
said facilities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance is hereby
granted for those roadway and drainage improvements in Mediterra Parcel 103, pursuant
to the plat thereofrecorded in Plat Book 34, pages 26 through 29, and the Clerk is hereby
authorized to release the maintenance security.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the
future maintenance and other attendant costs for those roadway and drainage
improvements that are not required to be maintained by the Villoresi Neighborhood
Association.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same,
this ;}ftJ#1 day of F.ilJrt-l/lt1 ,2008.
" ,?J, ", ~.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER C UNTY, LORIDA
6(
Approved as to form and legal
sufficiency:
Item #
{(OAIO
Agenda 2..-Iz. k Ire:
Dale ~~j
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 1 6 A 11
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Prinl on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered La the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or infonnation needed. lfthe document is already complete with the
exee tion of the Chairman's si ature, draw a line throu h roulin lines # I thrau h #4, com Jete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson line #5 .
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
List in routin order
1.
Ji
2.
;). )of.,. 0 'g
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records
Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summa!)'. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chainnan's signature are to be delivered to the BCC office only after the BCe has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff
Contact
Agenda Date Item was
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Phone Number
k sg 1-
\-1
2h
101
Agenda Item Number
Ic,...A'
I
~c.t ,,\- ~ "'"
3
Number of Original
Documents Attached
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is Yes N/A(Not
aonrooriate. (Initial) Aoolicable)
1. Original document has been signed/initialed for ]egal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, /'
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and possibly State Officials.)
2. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's r'
Office and all other parties except the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
3. The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the ~
document or the final ne2:otiated contract date whichever is aODlicable.
4. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's ,,/
signature and initials are reauired.
5. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. ~
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCe's actions are nullified. Be aware ofvour deadlines!
6. The document was approved by the BCC ond.;;ll. ,(1 V (enter date) and all changes N/A is not
made during the meeting have heen incorporated iu the attached document. The 9f an option for
Countv Attornev's Office has reviewed the chanves, if annlicahle. line 6.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
J: Forms/ County Forms/BCC Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Origina19.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
16All
MEMORANDUM
Date:
March 4, 2008
To:
John Houldsworth, Senior Engineer
Engineering Services Department
From:
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Resolution 2008-43
Enclosed please find one copy of the document as referenced above
(Agenda Items # 16All), approved by the Board of County
Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008.
If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me
at 252-8411.
Thank you.
Enclosure
16All
RESOLUTION NO. 08- 43
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA AUTHORIZING FINAL
ACCEPTANCE OF CERTAIN ROADWAY AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN CLASSICS
PLANTATION ESTATES, PHASE ONE,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 37, PAGES 87
THROUGH 90; RELEASE OF THE
MAINTENANCE SECURITY; AND
ACCEPTANCE OF THE MAINTENANCE
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT
REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE
CLASSICS PLANTATION ESTATES
HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on
June 6, 2001 approved the plat of Classics Plantation Estates, Phase One for recording;
and
WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway and
drainage improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications as
required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 04-41, as
amended); and
WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway and
drainage improvements and release of his maintenance security; and
WHEREAS, the Engineering Services Section of the Development Services
Department has inspected the roadway and drainage improvements, and is recommending
acceptance of said facilities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance is hereby
granted for those roadway and drainage improvements in Classics Plantation Estates,
Phase One, pursuant to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 37, pages 87 through 90,
and the Clerk is hereby authorized to release the maintenance security.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the
future maintenance and other attendant costs for those roadway and drainage
improvements that are not required to be maintained by the Classics Plantation Estates
Homeowners' Association.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same,
this ~d~~o\ F'L'orw.ry ,2008.
;1..,' C",~>,.,
DA 1;~\i:~:;!:f(:l\.~€
AmST" . '. .
D:~I ::;mt~~
,. '..'..
:~::~url:~~l~,~~~U~~;i:~~1
sufj7fi~rcY: ,
I
I
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER ~~Y' FRIDA
By: :JfJ1--
TOM HENNING, CHAIRMA
Item #
I~A-Il
Agenda Zhk ftif:
Date ~.
Date z..J., ill~1:.
~~~~c
Deputy Clerk
....-:"""
\D (tlCY"d .3"'3~
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 16
Pr;nt on pink pap}~~h ~~~~)C~,~,S~~'~';":n~~~~!c~~~l~~~'~~ l~r,~,~~~,~~~o~,~~~~~~~nd original C 1
do(.;umcnts are 1.0 be forwarded 1.0 the BOard Office only afh'f the Board l1<)s taken uction on lhe item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
exec tion of the Chainnan's si nature, draw a line throll h routin lines # 1 thrau h #4, com Jete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
List in routin order
2.
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
infonnation. All original documents nccding the Bee Chairman's signature are to he delivered to the Bee ol1lce only altcr the Bee has acted to approve the
item.
3.
4.
Board of County Commissioners
Name of Primary Staff Pam Callis Phone Number 403-2359
Contact
Agenda Date Item was February 26, 2008 Agenda Item Number 16CI
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document Executive Summary, Number of Original
Attached Satisfactions of Lien Documents Attached
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager
6. Minutes and Records
Clerk of Court's Office
Yes
(Initial)
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chainnan, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exee t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the Bee's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 2/26/2008 (enter date) and all changes
made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The
Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Iicable.
1J~
:ye
'j) t!-
..ilC!..
....J/
~pl?
-])t.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
I: Fomlsl County Fomlsl Bee Forms! Original Documcnts Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
16Cl
Recommendation to adopt a Resolution to approve the Satisfactions of Lien for Solid Waste
residential accounts wherein the County has received payment and said Liens are satisfied in
full for the 1991, 1995, and 1996 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special
Assessment. Fiscal impact is $68.50 to record the Satisfactions of Lien.
OBJECTIVE: Adopt a Resolution approving the Satisfactions of Lien for residential accounts
where the County has received payment in full for the 1991, 1995, and 1996 Solid Waste Collection
Services Special Assessment.
CONSIDERATIONS:
Resolution No. 93-29 adopted by the Board on January 26, 1993 provided for the recording of the
list of 1991 delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessment and a
mailing of a written notice of the imposition of each residential unit lien. Resolution No. 93-29 was
recorded on February 1, 1993 in Official Record Book 1793, Pages 459 through 598 of the Official
Records of Collier County, Florida, which placed a lien on certain residential properties for the
1991 Solid Waste Collection Services Special Assessment.
Resolution No. 2000-236 adopted by the Board on August 1, 2000 provided for the recording of the
list of 1995 delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessment and a
mailing of a written notice of the imposition of each residential unit lien. Resolution No. 2000-236
was recorded on August 8, 2000 in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273 of the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, which placed a lien on certain residential properties for
the 1995 Solid Waste Collection Services Special Assessment.
Resolution No. 2000-237 adopted by the Board on August 1,2000 provided for the recording of the
list of 1996 delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessment and a
mailing of a written notice of the imposition of each residential unit lien. Resolution No. 2000-237
was recorded on August 8, 2000 in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309 of the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, which placed a lien on certain residential properties for
the 1996 Solid Waste Collection Services Special Assessment.
Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, provides the Satisfactions of Lien shall be
approved by Resolution.
The attached Resolution lists the five accounts that have paid in full for the 1991, 1995, and 1996
Solid Waste Collection Services Special Assessment Lien.
FISCAL IMP ACT: The fiscal impact for recording the Satisfactions of Lien and the Resolutions is
approximately $68.50, which is to be charged to County Water/Sewer Operating Fund (408).
16Cl
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management impact associated with
these items.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached Resolution
approving the five Satisfactions of Lien for the accounts listed in the Resolutions and authorizing
the Chairman to sign the five Satisfactions of Lien for the 1991, 1995, and 1996 Solid Waste
Collection Services Special Assessment Lien.
PREPARED BY: Pam Callis, Revenue Supervisor, Utility Billing and Customer Service.
RESOLUTION NO. 2008 _ 44
16Cl
A RESOLUTION APPROVING SATISFACTIONS OF LIEN
FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE PAID IN FULL
THE 1991, 1995, AND 1996 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
AND DISPOSAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
t'l
~
I--I"-:>~
-...J=l::"""<'D
l\J>-i'fI:><:J......
C>::l:oo :::I
J::=:.~:-:-<: ..
o_~
WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, the Board of ~ ::
='"
=
County Commissioners on January 26, I 993 adopted Resolution No. 93-29 authorizing the recording
~,
=
,-
- =
'-'l t:cJ
'"
of notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments ~
=
=
~,
for 1991; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, the Board of County = :::;
co =
-.=
= =
Commissioners on August I, 2000 adopted Resolution No. 2000-236 authorizing the recording of.;s. ~
~...... ~
notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for :: :: ~
....,.~~
= co
1995 and ;:' ~ ...t:::=.
~ ~.+::::o
.~ =
::lII: ;;::: c:>
WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, the Board of ~ :; ?:'
t;-") t:o<:1
"'=
.~ ~ ...t:::..
County Commissioners on August 1,2000 adopted Resolution No. 2000-237 authorizing the recording ~ ~ c.....>
= 0 <.....>
::O~. ...a:::::.
=
= =
of notices ofliens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments '" g 'U
~ ~ G'")
I:;:-' tx:l ...-
= ~,
=
for 1996 and ~ g c.....>
= --l
~--.J
~ ..J;:::::.
WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, requires the Board to approve
by Resolution and record in the Official Records Satisfactions of Lien on all accounts that have been
paid in full.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended,
the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of the 1991, 1995, and 1996 Service Year Solid Waste
Collection and Disposal Special Assessments for the following accounts numbered below, subsequent
to the adoption of Resolution No. 93-29, 2000-236, 2000-237, whereupon liens have been recorded
on real property pertaining to the accounts identified herein.
The Satisfactions of Lien attached hereto referencing the accounts identified herein are hereby
approved and the Chairman is hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the Board of County
Commissioners, and the Clerk is directed to record this Resolution and these Satisfactions of Lien
individually in the official records of Collier County:
Account No.
22282 24536 29696 87308 94252
-
,-
= =
= =
~=
=-
~=
=
'0 =
= ~
= =
This Resolution adopted this d.i.L day of Febr'Ul1..r~, 2008, after motion,
second and majority vote.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
~ ~~O.C-.
Atttft . to Qi , .
~~s""tm and
lega f . cy: ~
BY;
TOM
16Cl
><-
><-
><-
C)
::0
...".
c....,
LV
...".
--a
c;-)
LV
--:J
-..]
<...n
><-
><-
><-
*** 4134845 OR: 4334 PG: 3776 ***
RBCORDBD in OPPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY. PL
03i03i2008 at 02:31PM DWIGHT B. BROCK. CLERK
RBC PEB 10.00
coms 1.00
This instrument prepared by:
Robert Zachary
Assistant County Attorney
Office of the County Attorney
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
(239) 774- 8400
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTBROPFICE 4TH FLOOR
EX! 7240
Property Folio No. 64920280001
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of
a certain Lien against:
AYALA, MARY GARCIA
1706 PALM AVE
IMMOKALEE FL 33934-0000
The Lien was recorded on the 1st day of February 1993, in Official Record Book
1793, Pages 459 through 598, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of
Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One
Hundred Two Dollars and No Cents ($102.00) plus accrued interest and
penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated
in Collier County, Florida, described as follows:
PALM EST S 93FT N 186FT LOT 4 + S 94FT LOT 4 OR 818 PG
660
Folio No.
Project No.
Account No.
64920280001
60000
87308
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby
acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby
cancels Lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of
Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the
Lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this
Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 01 ~ t;h day of
Fehruo.. ")i . 2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
.
.to By:
TOM
~avid C. eigel
County Attorney
16Cl
This instrument prepared by:
Robert Zachary
Assistant County Attorney
Office of the County Attorney
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
(239) 774- 8400
*** 4134846 OR: 4334 PG: 3777 ***
RECORDED In OFPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIBR COONTY, PL
OJ/OJ/2U08 at 02:J1PM DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK
RBC PEE 10.00
coms 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THB BOARD
INTEROmCB 4TH FLOOR
EKT 7240
16C1
Property Folio No. 68342480003
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of
a certain Lien against:
MORRIS, EARL W & KATHY A
66 ISLE PF ST THOMAS
NAPLES 33961-0000
The Lien was recorded on the 1 st day of February 1993, in Official Record Book
1793, Pages 459 through 598, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of
Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One
Hundred Ninety Nine Dollars and Forty Four Cents ($199.44) plus accrued
interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real
property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows:
PORT AU PRINCE L T 66 OR 1145 PG 1568
Folio No.
Project No.
Account No.
68342480003
60000
94252
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby
acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby
cancels Lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of
Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the
Lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this
Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 61 tP t:h day of
Februa"(4 , 2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
a,
Ailf:iI!JMIns lift It'Orm
a~ ,n~
David C. eigel
County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Robert Zachary
Assistant County Attorney
Office of the County Attorney
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
(239) 774-8400
*** 4134847 OR: 4334 PG: 3778 ***
RECORDED In OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL
OJi03i1008 at 02:31PM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLBRK
REC PEE ]0.00
COPIES 1.00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTEROmCB 4TH FLOOR
m 7240
16Cl
Property Folio No. 62203480009
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the
owner and holder of a certain Lien against:
BOWER, WILLlAM=& RUTH
5537 SHOL TZ ST
NAPLES FL 341138766
The Lien was recorded on the 8th day of August 2000, in Official Record Book
2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court
of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One
Hundred Two Dollars and Eighty Nine Cents ($102.89), plus accrued interest
and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property
situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows:
NAPLES MANOR EXT BLK 5 LOT 15
Folio No.
Project No.
Account No.
62203480009
65000
22282
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby
acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby
cancels Lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of
Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the
Lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of
this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisO?& day of Febf'ua?4
2008. '
ATTEST: .
DWIGHT 'E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER C UNTY, ORIDA
.
0.(.. By:
This instrument prepared by:
Robert Zachary
Assistant County Attorney
Office of the County Attorney
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
(239) 774-8400
*** 4134848 OR: 4334 PG: 3779 ***
RECORDED In OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
03103/2008 at 02:31PM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
RBC m 10.00
COPIBS ].00
Retn:
CLBRK TO THE BOARD
INTERomCE 4TH FLOOR
BXT 7240
Property Folio No: 62203480009
16Cl
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the
owner and holder of a certain Lien against:
BOWER, WILLlAM=& RUTH
5537 SHOL TZ ST
NAPLES FL 341138766
The Lien was recorded on the 8TH day of August 2000, in Official Record Book
2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court
of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One
Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and
penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated
in Collier County, Florida, described as follows:
NAPLES MANOR EXT BLK 5 LOT 15
Folio No.
Project No.
Account No.
62203480009
66000
24536
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby
acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby
cancels Lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of
Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the
Lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida, acting through its Chairman directs execution and recording of
this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thi~ day of Fehrua?l
2008.
ATTEST: BOARD OF UNTY OMMlSSIONERS
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER C NTY, ORIDA
.
~~ (ll.LIA ~l.By:
~.n to C1(jtl'lllli}, - TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN
Ap~... todbtm
Q7cienc~-;
rD!v~ c.;;C
County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Robert Zachary
Assistant County Attorney
Office of the County Attorney
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
(239) 774-8400
*** 4134849 OR: 4334 PG: 3780 ***
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
0'/03/1008 at 02:31PM DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK
RBC FEE 10.00
COPIES 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
BXT 1240
Property Folio No: 68342480003
16Cl
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the
owner and holder of a certain Lien against:
CATETE, JOSE LUIS
LUCILA CATETE
66 ISLE OF SAINT THOMAS ST
NAPLES FL 341149402
The Lien was recorded on the 8TH day of August 2000, in Official Record Book
2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court
of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One
Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and
penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated
in Collier County, Florida, described as follows:
PORT AU PRINCE LOT 66 OR 1860 PG 1561
Folio No.
Project No.
Account No.
68342480003
66000
29696
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby
acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby
cancels Lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of
Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the
Lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida, acting through its Chairman directs execution and recording of
this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisdC.:z.. day of Fehru..~
2008. .
ATTEST:
DWIGHT EO, BROCK, CLERK
BOAR..~OF OUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER OUNT LORlDA
.
By: .
TOM HENNIN , CHAIRM
ApM~\\t"a\m'lorm
and legal sufficiency ~
~/
1; David C. igel
County Attorney
10 {((oid 3-3~
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 16 C 2
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Origmul documenls should be hand dchvcrcd to the Board Ot1icc. n1C completed routing slip and original
documents are to he forwarded to the Board Office only afh.'r the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
exec lion of the Chainnan's si ature, draw a line thrall h routin lines # 1 thrau h #4, com lete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson line #5 .
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
List in routin order)
1.
2.
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the BCe Chairman's sIgnature are to he dcliver..:d to the Bce office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.)
3.
4.
Name of Primary Staff Pam Callis Phone Number 403-2359
Contact
Agenda Date Item was February 26, 2008 Agenda Item Number 16C2
Approved bv the BCC
Type of Document Executive Summary, Exhibit A and Number of Original I
Attached Satisfaction of Notice of Claim of Lien Documents Attached
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
1}6
;])(!.,.
J)~
1)C
1)~
1J~
6. Minutes and Records
Clerk of Court's Office
I: Forms/ County Fomls/ Bee Forms/ Original Documcnts Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in lhe Nol Applicable column, whichever is
a fO nate,
Original document has been signed/inilialed for ]egal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chainnan, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossib] State Officials.
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by lhe County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs arc placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the Bec office within 24 hours ofBCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCe's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines~
The document was approved hy the BCC on 2/26/2008 (enter date) and all changes
made dnring the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The
Count Attorne lS Office has reviewed the chao es, if a licable.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
16C2
Recommendation to approve, execute and record a Satisfaction of a Notice of Claim of Lien for
Sanitary Sewer System Impact Fee. Fiscal impact is $10.00 to record the Satisfaction of Lien.
OBJECTIVE: Recommendation that the Board acknowledges full payment and executes the
Satisfaction of Claim of Lien.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida as the
Governing Body of Collier County and as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County
Water/Sewer District of Collier County, Florida, recorded the Claim of Lien in the Office of the Clerk
of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida.
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"
Full payment and satisfaction of this lien have been made.
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the Satisfaction of Claim of Lien.
FISCAL IMPACT: Payment in full for this Claim of Lien increases the cash flow in the County's
Sewer Impact Fee (Fund 413) by $1,055.00. The fiscal impact for recording this Satisfaction of Claim
of Lien is approximately $10.00, which is to be charged to (Fund 408) the County Water/Sewer
Operating Fund Utility Billing cost center.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT: There is no Growth Management impact associated with this item.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to acknowledge full payment and the satisfaction of this
lien and to surrender the same canceled, and to direct the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County
to cancel the same of record. Authorize the Chairman to execute the Satisfaction of Claim of Lien.
PREPARED BY: Pam Callis, Revenue Supervisor, Utility Billing Customer Service.
EXHIBIT
"A"
1. J. Bryan Emory & June P. Riggin, securing the principal balance of one
thousand fifty five dollars ($1,055.00). Folio# 31155007024.
11:0,
f!6.02
.~-, v
This instrument prepared by:
Robert Zachary
Assistant County Attorney
Office of the County Attorney
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
(239) 774-8400
*** 4134814 OR: 4334 PG: 3736 ***
RBCORDED In OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL
03/03/1008 at 02:16PM DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLBRK
REC FEE 10.00
COPIES 1.00
Retn:
CLERK TO THB BOARD
INTERomCE 4TH FLOOR
BXT me
16C2
SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF CLAIM OF LIEN
FOR SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEES
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF
COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER
COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against:
J. BRYAN EMORY AND JUNE P RIGGIN
19237 SAVANNAH ROAD
GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE, 19947
The Lien was recorded on the 10TH day of February 2005, in Official Record Book
3731, Page(s) 3982, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of
Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand Fifty Five Dollars and No
Cents ($1,055.00), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain
obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows:
UNIT #3 ZIRCON, ENCHANTING SHORES CO-OP, A CO-OPERATIVE MOBILE
HOME PARK LOCATED IN COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA.
FOLIO NUMBER: 31155007024
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County
Water-Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges
receipt of payment in full Satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien
in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to
exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, and as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District,
acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by
action of the Board this~ day of FebruQ;:J ,2008. .... ,,,,,,'.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~~lt. /4e:rQG~
......... 011 h '
Approved as to form and
Legal sufficiency:
~
/KJwCEl
COUNTY ATTORNEY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMtSSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORiDA, AS THE _
GOVERNING BODY OF CQLUERCOUNTY AND
AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARDOp:
THE COLLIER COUNTY WATE;R-SEWER"
DISTRICT, .
Td~N,"~A~
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 D 1
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document Original dOCllt11~1l1s should he hand delivered to the 8o<:lrd Ornce. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be Ic)rwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item,)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or inlormation needed. If the document is already complete with the
r h Ch' d I' h r # h h #4 I h h k' d .
exceptIOn 0 t e airman s sIgnature, raw a me througl routmg tnes It roug , complete tee ec "lIst, an forward to Sue Filson (lme #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routin!!: order)
I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service .::ti-- Z/zv
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of tile original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information, All original documents needing the BCC Chainnan's signature are to be delivered to the BCe office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Slaff Frank Ramsey. Housing Manager
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Phone Number
Agenda Item Number
Number of Original
Documents Attached
252-2336
]6D
Yes
(Initial)
N/A(Not
A licable)
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances.
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
lbe Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved hy the BCC on 02/t2/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Iicable.
1(
'4/-...
7f-.
7(c
n/a
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1i
17C
I: Forms/ County Fonns/ Bee Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
Return to
4134088 OR: 4334 PG: 1225
RBCORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. Fl
01/19/1008 at 01:10PM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLER~
REC FEE
COPIES
27.00
3.00
\)
Frank Ramsey
Collier County HHS
3301 F:. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 341 12
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
EXT7W
16D1
File# 08-133-IF
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this .d...& day of January. 2008, between Collier County. a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Margarita Del Socorro Escobar"
(OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as 'The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impacl fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective dale of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "8," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three
Hundred Seventv Two and 46/100 Dollars ($19,372.46). Repayment shall include any
accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in
no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A." which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against Ihe dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and Ihis Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tcnant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
OR: 4334 PG: 1226
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordinal,6 D 1
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER CO INTY, F ORIDA,
.
.J/
By:JllUJ, ~1~. C\L'
, r: lerk
Attht II. CWI "
11",.turt CMll-
By:
OWNER:
I-k~~ eLf fmMO &~
~el Socorro Escobar
~es.ses' /. ;
r )J)~~~
Print Name I . tfS.
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
OWNER:
2008,
greement was acknowledged before me this ~ day of J{,U\\JO-'~ '
\). . xo\.,c,.c, who is personally known to me or has pr uced
as proof of identity.
Ap
an
/} ~~/U- '~2QFJ~.4
Signature of Person Taking Ackno~ledgment
ssista
Recommend Approval:
~id^~~
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1227 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 165, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77,
inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
13417 Gemmer Road, Naples, Florida 34114
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type ofImpact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
J. Water Impact Fee
K. Sewer Impact Fee
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
JAK Approved_I_I_
Amount Owed
$ I 00.59
$62.08
$368.18
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$4 I 0.00
$171.61
$3,415.00
$3,515.00
$19,372.46
16Dl
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 16 D 2
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered 10 the Board Office lhe completed routing slip and original
documents are to be lorwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken aclioll on the item,)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
excention aCthe Chairman's sionature, draw a line throul1h routinp lines # 1 through #4, comnlete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routin!? order)
I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service '7? ?-/7 '6
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONT ACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending BCe approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Frank Ramsey. Housing Manager
Phone Number
252-2336
16D - 2--
Yes
(Initial)
NIA (Not
A licable)
Agenda Item Number
t Fee Deferra] Agreement
Number of Original
Documents Attached
'1{
nla
.fL
'%
11
ff-
I.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions. etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracls. agreements. etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossib] State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arlies exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
[n most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the ehan es, if a licable.
I: Forms! County Forms! Bee Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised] .26.05, Revised 2.24.05
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
\(7
\
Return to
4134089 OR: 4334 PG: 1228
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL
01/29/2008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK
REC PEE
COPIES
17.00
UO
Frank Ramsey
Collier County HHS
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Floridll34112
Retn:
CLERK TO THB BOARD
INTEROmCE 4TH FLOOR
EXT 7140
16D2
File# 08-134- IF
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into Ihis 2li.. day of January, 2008. between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Esaie Foreste and Lyla Foreste"
(OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
I. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of Ihe Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impacl fees deferred shall be paid 10 the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the Iransfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three
Hundred Seventv Two and 46/1 00 Dollars ($19,372.46). Repayment shall include any
accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in
no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the tolal fee amount
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with Ihis
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interesl, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner. lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory complelion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default undcr the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
-
OR: 4334 PG: 1229
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ord:n~,D 2
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of Ihe County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROCK; Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
B;: (\.LuA ~n-.twtJ'p.c-
IlttUt IS Chi? flerk
ItllftWt 0111-
By:
'..'6'
YltUk
OWNER:
/-7'
~ . ./ /. if;
,~ . t1'J, 0 (~'7G:J .
Esaie Foreste /
W~~ /?
:J ;>u- /
piintName A);" ."",-
~.
1M, . 7
OWNER:
Y;j ttlm. ~
L;''-t~reste ! u u/ S -
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
2008,
The foregoing Agreement was acknowledged before me this ;28 day of j(,nIJOI "ls '
by Eso~e .. [..:,10 ~"'J\e , who is personally known to me or has prod ced
, as proof of identity. _.. --
[NOTARIAL SEAL]
Recommend Ap
/-1
L~
cy Krumbin PA
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1230 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 161, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77,
inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
13437 Gemmer Road, Naples, Florida 34114
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type ofImpact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
J. Water Impact Fee
K. Sewer Impact Fee
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
JAK Approved -.-1_1_
16D2
Amount Owed
$100.59
$62.08
$368.18
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$410.00
$171.61
$3,415.00
$3,515.00
$19,372.46
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered 10 the Board OHlee. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after thi; Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
16D3
Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, andlor information needed. If the document is already complete with the
exception afthe Chairman's signature, draw a line throUl:!h routing lines # I Ihrou 111 #4, comolete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routinl!: order)
I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service 7t ? /l I{
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one ot'the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact stafT for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature arc to be delivered to the Bee office only after the BCC has acted to approve the
item.)
Name of Primary Staff
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager
Phone Number
252-2336
16D- :::,
Yes
(Initia])
N/A(Not
A licable)
Agenda Item Number
Impact Fee Deferral Agreement
~
Number of Original
Documents Attached
-It
,.
#-
n/a
I.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column. whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception ofrnost letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to Ihe Board and ossibly State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Oftice and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si ature and initials are re uircd.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Fi]son in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the ehan es, if a lieable.
7L
lIL
71---
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
I: Forms/ County Forms/ BCC Fanus/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Rcvist:d 2.24.05
Return to
4134090 OR: 4334 PG: 1231
RBCORDED In OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY. FL
01/19/1008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E, BROCK. CLERK
REC PEE
COPIES
17.00
3.00
\;0-;
Frank Ramsey
Collier County HHS
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTERomCE 4TH FLOOR
BX1'7240
16D3
File# 08-BI-IF
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this :J8 day of January, 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Antoinette Laguerre" (OWNER),
collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County. Florida, known as 'The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impacl fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not laler then Ihe effective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "8," the amount of the dcferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three
Hundred Seventv Two and 46/1 00 Dollars ($19,372.46). Repayment shall include any
accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in
no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operale as a lien againsl the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred. assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest. this I ien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any I ien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement. and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
OR: 4334 PG: 1232
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordinan!,6 D 3
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the ofticial records of the County at no cosl to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER C UNTY. 'LORIDA.
'0
BY:_tl.uu ).~oe
Attest IS to6cw.~ ty flerk
I f9!tlt.".. on I .
~, " .
By:
l:sit"
Print Name i~%~\1' S)(PXY'\Ot!\
OWNER:
(J/k~ )'.cL~~e
Antoinette Laguerre
OWNER:
Witn ses:
Print Name
r
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
2008,
The f9.,regoing Agreement was acknowledged before mc this ~ day of J'lrlllClI'-l ,
by / -\ ' Lo.3 ,-x, rt: , who is pes.sonally known to me or has pr6duced
'. as proof of identity.
1 ~m :~tl~ ~
Signature of Person Taking Ackno edgment
[NO' _ .' " ,..; (11(,\ TREJO :
~ \: 1,;\f'I:';' ;'~:)~I'iJ(jl;!:t
';",;l.!t,~ ""ii, ,'" :'[)':1 ~
'''' ,,,,,,,. ;."" S
v""'..r'_",.J","'~'\I'VV'v,,-vV'.~
Ap
and
ow
ounty Attorney
R~mmend Appr. ~~ ~
~rumbi e, MPA
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
Jeffr
Chie
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1233 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 163, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77,
inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
13427 Gemmer Road, Naples, Florida 34114
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type oflmpact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
J. Water Impact Fee
K. Sewer Impact Fee
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
J AK Approved _/_1_
Amount Owed
$100.59
$62.08
$368. I 8
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$410.00
$171.61
$3,415.00
$3,515.00
$19,372.46
16D3
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 D 4
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the [~oard OHicc The completed routing slip and original
documents aTe to be Il)rwardcd to the Board Office only after the Hoard has wkcll actioll 0111hc item)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. Ifthe document is already complete with the
rth d r h h r #1 h h #4 I I h kl d" d S F.l (r #5)
exception 0 e Chairman's sIgnature, raw a me t mugr routmg mes t rougt , comp elc tIC c ec 1St, an orwar to ue I son me
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routing order)
I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service rf- 2/2-,1)'
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman '5 signature are to be delivered to the BeC office only after the BCC has acted to approve the
item.)
Name of Primary Staff
Contact
Agenda Date [tern was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager
Phone Number
252-2336
16D "y
Yes
(Initial)
N/A (Not
A licable)
Agenda Item Number
Number of Original
ocuments Attached
-:U
-Il
-1t-
,*c
Y..
n/a
I.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, musl be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk 10 the Board and ossibly State Officia]s.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all olher arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on Ihe appropriate pages indicaling where the Chairman' s
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable.
71-
'7JL
2,
3.
4.
5.
6.
1: Forms! County Forms! BCe Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revi~ed 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
Return to
4134091 OR: 4334 PG: 1234
RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL
0111911008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLBRK
RBC PEE
COPIES
27.00
3.00
\; fir;
Frank Ramsey
Collier County HHS
3301 E. Tamillmi Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
Retn:
CLERK TO THB BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
BXT 7140
16D4
File# 08-132-IF
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this./8 day of January. 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Antoine Joseph and Saintherese
Joseph" (OWNER). collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, Ihe receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impacl Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement. the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2, The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "B." the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twentv Six Thousand Two
Hundred Fortv and 68/1 00 Dollars ($26.240.68). Repayment shall include any accrued
interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no
event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfac1ion of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with Ihe land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interesl in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee. or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written nolice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
OR: 4334 PG: 1235
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordinaJe,6 D 4-
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare thai the deferred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement. plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis unlil paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIE.7NTY, F ORIDA, .
By: ::J'fJL'. ~~
TOM HENNING, CHAIRM
By:-f'u.u..... ~,,~.Q-(_
Attest ISCllt> )Ierk
Ifgqtwe .1.'1
OWNER:
Wit1J~f!w J~
Print Name:Jloe. woe V\ \
~ J /' .,7
4A"l CJ..U4.e; J ~'5t-l/ht
Antoine Joseph
OWNER:
C (d~~
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
Witnesses:
//~
Print Name
f:)(),;"fljerr-Jp Jo.5e.fl1
Saintherese Joseph
2008,
The foregoing Agreement was acknowledged before me this 22f:L. day o(.,>-J)\\uo,'b '
by I?r; 10'''' " /())(j.J1, -t s ~, who is_personally known to me or has pr duced
, as proof of identily'.
[N~]'i(A7iin()
:.~/"" """ ,
~..... .-" .,. "
,"li ,.' '.
","\.1'''''\/'\/'1.' V'/,~'" v VVV\/\IV'V'V'\I"V'V
, L-L
/}~n-/U<.. JL~
Signature of Person Taking AcknoWledgment
App
and
Recommend Approval:
Jeffre
Chief SSIS
tzkow
t County Attorney
~~'-P
cy Krumbi . PA
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1236 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
,16D4
, t.,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 3, Block 14, Naples Manor Addition, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat
Book 3, pages 67 and 68, Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
Street Address
5410 Hardee Street, Naples, Florida 34113
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type ofImpact Fee
Amount Owed
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
$100.59
$149.38
$460.23
$935.00
$2,068.00
$8,228.00
$6,359.00
$725.00
$285.48
$3,515.00
$3,415.00
$26,240.68
A. EMS Impact Fee
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
l. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
J. Sewer System Impact Fee
K. Water System Impact Fee
JAK Approved _/ _/_
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 D 5
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original documcnt. Original doclIments should be hand delivered to the Board Office. rhe completed routing slip and original
documents are to be f()TWarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
rth Ch .. d r h h r # I h h #4 I h h kr d" d S n (r #5)
exception 0 e alTman S Signature, raw a me t rougr roullng mes t rougn , complete tee ec 1St, an orwar to ue 1 son me
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routinl! order)
l.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service 7t- -'/7~
c>-- ,:_~
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
infonnation, All original documents needing the BCe Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the BCe office only after the nee has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document 1m act Fee Deferra Agreement
Attached
Phone Number
Agenda Hem Number
Number of Original
Documents Attached
252-2336
]60-<;"'
Yes
(Initial)
N/A(Not
A licable)
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Nol App]icable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
Original documenl has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters. must be reviewed and signed
by the Office ofthe County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances.
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials.
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other aTties exce t Ihe BCC Chainnan and the Clerk to the Board
The Chainnan's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriale pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require fOT\varding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the Bee's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by tbe BCe on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed tbe chan es, if a Iicable.
'7r-
Tt
'-"j'
77"--
~-
'-1-(L..
n/a
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
t?
I: Fonns/ County Forms! BeC F'onns/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24,05
Rtturn to
4134092 OR: 4334 PG: 1237
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY. FL
01119/2008 at 01:50FM DWIGHT E, BROCK. CLERK
REC FEE
COPIES
11.00
3.00
\;;
V
Frank Ramsey
Collier County HilS
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 341 12
Retn:
CLERK TO THB BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
EXT 7140
File# 08-129-IF
16D5
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this J 1 day of January, 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Oanielle Alexandre" (OWNER),
collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
I. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as 'The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "8," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three
Hundred Seventy Two and 46/100 Dollars ($19,372.46). Repayment shall include any
accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in
no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
OR: 4334 PG: 1238
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordina~e,6 D 5
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
By: 11. fill ~I~:lj,~.c
Attest. as.to I ~ Clerk
11",aturt OIl . ..
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIE~l)UNTY, LORIDA~
By: ;]'fJt.
TOM HENNING, CHAIR
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
~/
_1.~.'
Dani' e Alexan~re
OWNER:
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
2008,
The fOnOingAgreement was alknowledged before me this .2:..i... day of
by q n""i/" /J IN",,/, r,,-, who is personally known to me or
as proof of identity.
~"''''..."
),,;, ", \lJi\\L\ !,(Y{,{\:'~I)I~lrl
'~. ..,'c...
.) ~ - -\,\<:\'.1-," :i ";'11'.1;',:
~ '\~.-,.,., " - .. . \..'~'i
)1"-1..,'.;,.. " ,
.,"V.r\l\...../'\I\.--\.I'..I'Y,Y\I"VV'J~
'J Z J. ,-4.
//ftU/ : ?>~r ~
Signature of Person Taking Ac wledgment
mend Approval:
Jeffr
Chie
zkow
nt County Attorney
J-J!'O
a cy Krumbine, A
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1239 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 162, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77,
inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
13431 Gemmer Road, Naples, Florida 34114
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type of Impact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
J. Water Impact Fee
K. Sewer Impact Fee
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
JAK Approved _1_1_
Amount Owed
$100.59
$62.08
$368.18
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$410.00
$171.61
$3,415.00
$3,515.00
$19,372.46
1605
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO D 6
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original dncumt;nts should he hand delivered to the Board OHke. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Hoard Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information nceded. If the document is already complete with the
excention afthe Chainnan's signature, draw a line throu!:!h routiOl~ lines # 1 throuf!h #4, comnlete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5)
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routincr order)
I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service "7t- -;'/,:-' ~
(.-_./ L_."
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval, Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one oCthe addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the BCe Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the BCC has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager
Phone Number
252-2336
16D- (C,
Yes
(Initial)
N/A(Not
A licable)
Agenda Item Number
Number of Original
Documents Attached
-:ff::.
~
7J,(
'::f-rC
n/a
I.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initia] the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances.
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements. etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCe approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a Ikable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the Bec office within 24 hours of BCe approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The Couuty Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable.
-::4{
~
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
I: Forms/ COW1ty Forms/ Bee Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
Return to
4134093 OR: 4334 PG: 1240
RECOPDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL
01/29/2008 at 01:50FM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK
REC PEE
COFIES
17.00
3.00
/\)
\)
Frank Ramsey
Collier County HHS
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
EXT 7140
16D6
File# 08-136-IF
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this 31- day of January, 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Jose 1. Rosas Arroyo and Maria E.
Rosas" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "8," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three
Hundred Seventv Two and 46/1 00 Dollars ($19.372.46). Repayment shall include any
accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in
no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
OR: 4334 PG: 1241
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordinal,6 D 6
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROC;:K, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
By:C,,-, 1 U. =oJ L-O.C _
:'.Attest as to ~Ierk
I11J111t... <MIl.
By:
.
,zi,h,wlz-
1?C't:/L
OWNER:
r;idf ~ ~A8 Ii\,
e J. Ro s Arroyo
'1tesstzrh\M(\
prin~ame \C,/'r\ S:)r(lf\sef\
OWNER:
4J;4'~ t $~
Maria E. Rosas
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
2008,
The foregoing Agreement was acknowledged before me this 3L day of _JO/Il/U.r'tJ '
by 10')" \ F~ 1+ ~ ;,l {,L {..It:., who is personally known to me or has pr duced
- as proof of identity.
-;~w~' ',\ ( >i~1i~.,';ii_I\: ~r~{~:;? :
. <"'W' \h' '.,' :
"',""_, ,. ., ',..' "'C
"\f'.~".~"'V\"J"/v'",~~~
/J k7PC ~ ~I;:r
~ r
Signature of Person Taking Acknowledgment
atzkow
t County Attorney
]=:J'~~ ~
Marcy Krumbine. MPA
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1242 ***
EXHIBIT" A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 160, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77,
inclusive, ofthe Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
13441 Gemmer Road, Naples, Florida 34114
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type ofImpact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
1. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
J. Water Impact Fee
K. Sewer Impact Fee
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
JAK Approved_I_/_
Amount Owed
$100.59
$62.08
$368.18
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$410.00
$171.61
$3,415.00
$3,515.00
$19,372.46
16D6
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 16 D ?
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document Original documents should he hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Ofncc only after the l30ard has taken action on the item,)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
. # # h h k
exceotion of the Chainnan's sie:nature, draw a line through routing hnes 1 through 4, comolete tee ec list, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routing order)
I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service Tf- 7jz ?S
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff Frank Ramsey. Housing Manager
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Phone Number
Agenda Item Number
Number of Original
Documents Attached
252-2336
]6D-l-
Yes
(Initial)
N/A (Not
A licab]e)
I.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not App]icable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Altorney. This includes signature pages trom ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC oftice within 24 hours ofBCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCe's actions are nullified. Be aWare of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meetiug have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Iicable.
'1~
It
it
"
---+,,-
ii'
1-t
n/a
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
~-
I: Forms/ County Forms! BCC Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
Return to
4134094 OR: 4334 PG: 1243
RECORDED in OFPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL
01/19/1008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK
REC PEB 17.00
COPIES 3,00
'i)
\J
Frank Ramsey
Collier County HUS
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROPPICE 4TH PLOOR
EXT 1140
,16fJ? .If
File# 08-149-IF
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this ---'-- day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Gabince Fanfan and Monique Willien"
(OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
]. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall app]y.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three
Hundred Seventv Two and 46/100 Dollars ($19,372.46). Repayment shall include any
accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in
no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
tenninate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner. lessee. tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. ]n the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER. the COUNTY
OR: 4334 PG: 1244
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the Ordinance,
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees areJ. 6 D ?
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement. plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
. .
BY:~ ~Of
. . t as to, t:lerk
.,...it,n Oft
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLlIF~JNT~ORIDA' .
By: . ~ z~M
~ imNN G, CHAI~ '
Attest:
DWIGHT E, BROCK, Clerk
~r,~
print:Wame ~\",,':v(~
<ii
Gabt a:fan
~
' .:' 1
- . ,
oni Ii len .
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
2008,
The foregoing Agreement was acknqwledg~d before me this ...L..... day of r;hu. "try' '
by (Iu ;'i"I/L, '1 f j..lJ/11 que W. who IS personally known to me or has produced
, as proof of identity.
~~V~
) ..f~.....~:.", !-.;O;,:~L\ :.U:U.-1'RE.IO
S ~/. ,1i','1 ,'\L\li:,,;i\,~, ~,I,i;lll'~:
~ "\~')f ,\ <,.:' '.i';:") :-, ',:,,';,'-.! ".' ,1i!!.'\ ~
) I "" ~ ~ ' ., c
""""'\I'\.i"I""",,...IVV'^""'''f\f\i'~
~
Ignature of Person Taking Ackn' wledgment
---i-l-- ..
k"
Recommend App oval:
-.t.
--../
latzkow
tant County Attorney
Marcy Krumbi e, MPA
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1245 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 49, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77,
inclusive, ofthe Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
13473 Koinonia Drive, Naples, Florida 34114
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type ofImpact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
1. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
J. Water Impact Fee
K. Sewer Impact Fee
TOTAL IMP ACT FEES
JAK Approved _/ ~_
Amount Owed
$100.59
$62.08
$368.18
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$410.00
$171.61
$3,415.00
$3,515.00
$19,372.46
16D7
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 1
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 6 D 8
THE BOARD 01<' COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should bl~ h,llJd delivered to the Board Office. rhe completed routing slip and original
documents are to he forwarded to the Board Office only after the noard has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate tor additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
exception of the Chainnan's signature, draw a line throup"h routinp lines # I thrOUlTh #4, comnlete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routing order)
I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service -:JI- Z{Zr
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Nomlally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one ofthe addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact stafr lor additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the BCC Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the BCe office only after the BCC has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Phone Number
Agenda Item Number
Number of Original
Documents Attached
252-2336
16D-~
Yes
(Initial)
N/A(Not
A Ii cable)
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signedlinitia]ed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairmau. wilh the exceplion of most letters, musl be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages fTom ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts. agreements. etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials.
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arlies exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are required.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Fi]son in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCe's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable.
?C.
:::tf-.
~
7-L
n/a
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
-...L
~.
I....' .
-:fi--
1: Forms/ County Fonus/ Bee Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Rcvised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
Return to
4134095 OR: 4334 PG: 1246
RECORDBD in OPPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. PL
01/19/1008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK
REC PEE
COPlBS
27.00
3.00
1;
\I
Frank Ramsey
Collier County HHS
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
EXT 7240
16D8
File# 08-147-IF
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this ----1- day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Zilana Marc" (OWNER), collectively
stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflicl with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three
Hundred Seventv Two and 46/100 Dollars ($ I 9,372.461. Repayment shall include any
accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in
no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest. this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person. except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
OR: 4334 PG: 1247
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordinan~, 6 D 8
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. B~OCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER UNTY, LORIDA,
.
By: il..u..u iLl ~cy.l. .[). C. .
, uty Clerk
c ~It IS to .Ch<< IMIItl \
.t..... 0lI'1.
TOM HENNING, CHAIR
By:
~ ~
, In ame~-L)IV ~;O//;J--
OWNER:
3d-O?lfi j{at(~
Zilana Marc
OWNER:
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
2008,
The fo!:egoing Agreemel}t was acknowledged before me thi..s ~ day of Fh"IG''1 '
by Z I furta.. /(,(0,,- , who is personally .knuWll 10 me or has produced
as proof of identity.
~~fr6
:*,,,.,,,,.e. ,,,.,,,,
:; ""-''''Cw\\'~ \, 'j ! ", .~' IL,
; ',",", I
'vv..r.r~""'~".rV'ho' ~...,,',,'~ ..,,"J'.N.'V~~
//.
S gnature of Person Taking Ack wledgment
/'
:1:-
Ap
and
atzkow
t County Attorney
a cy Krumbine,
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
........0
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1248 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 51, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77,
inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
13481 Koinonia Drive, Naples, Florida 34114
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type ofImpact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
1. Water Impact Fee
K. Sewer Impact Fee
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
JAK Approved _1_1_
Amount Owed
$100.59
$62.08
$368.18
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$410.00
$171.61
$3,415.00
$3,515.00
$19,372.46
16D8
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
16D9
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original docullwnts should be hand delivered ((Jlhe Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Hoard Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
excention of the Chairman's sirmature, draw a line through routin!! lines # 1 through #4, comnJetc the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routincr order)
l.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service 7r- 2/2 '(
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMA nON
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the t:vent one of tile addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature arc to be delivered to tile Bee office only alter the BCC has acted to approve the
item.)
Name of Primary Staff
Contacl
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager
Phone Number
252-2336
16D -
Yes
(Initial)
N/A(Not
A Iicable)
Agenda Item Number
1m act Fee Deferra] Agreement
Number of Original
Documents Attached
~-
=ti-
:1i
':ff
n/a
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate,
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been enlered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicaling where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Fi]son in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Iicable.
'-1f-
~
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
I: Forms! County Forms! BCe Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised] .26.05, Revised 2.24.05
Returo to
4134096 OR: 4334 PG: 1249
RECORDED in OFPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL
01/29/2008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK
REC PBE 27.00
COPIES 3.00
IV)
\;
Frank Ramsey
Collier County HHS
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
Retn-
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTEROPPICE 4TH PLOOR
EXT 1140
File# 08-146-IF
This spact for recording
16D9
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this ~ day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Lunel Napoleon" (OWNER),
collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
I. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "8," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three
Hundred Seventy Two and 46/1 00 Dollars ($19,372.46). Repayment shall include any
accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in
no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
OR: 4334 PG: 1250
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the OrdinanceJ. 6 D 9
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER C UNTY, F ORIDA,
.
By: -1)111 ~ j" '~ ~ n.r
Attnt a ~ Glerk
110M'" _1.
By: .
. [log'
OWNER:
f~ (,79//(~-&--c~/
Lunel Napoleon
OWNER:
~:~M
P' NameDee.. ::Py-n'? h \
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
2008,
The foregoing Agree')1ent was acknowledg~d before me this ~ day of r:( 0, Jil~ '
by .Lot] t? / /\!(j '()"!t'~,, '- , who IS personally known to me or has pr uced
FL ,0 j. ' as proof of identity.
~JovS'R'tl"Vf~"V
~ ;,.~;tT,;,_ --~nK~.17\T1J'!\1l.1- rRL\O
'F'~-" ,..;.,.",,'"
, , ", , .' "-'11 \ ': \'" I' .'~ ,,' .'_,
~ .~~'. ,;,.' ' I. "","" I' ",: I I, ~
~~'-rl.'V-V'.,i"r..IV~
4 ;2"
;) . ').;n,z L'!. /. L( .-i::J
Signature of Person Taking Acknowfedgment
Recom end Approval:
latzkow
nt County Attorney
/
<:....-/~
arcy Krumbine,
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
-./L -V
A
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1251 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 52, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77,
inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
13485 Koinonia Drive, Naples, Florida 34114
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type of Impact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
J. Water Impact Fee
K. Sewer Impact Fee
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
JAKApproved~~/_
Amount Owed
$100.59
$62.08
$368.18
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$410.00
$17I.61
$3,415.00
$3,5 I 5.00
$19,372.46
16D9
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 D 1
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 0
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should he hand delivered lolhe 130md OtTice. The completed rOLlting slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Bonrd Office only after Ihe Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Comptete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
excention of the Chairman's signature, draw a line through routing lines # I through #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5),
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routinQ: order)
I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service If-- '7 );"" 5(
t:...-' .-
"-.- (
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder afthe original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff fOf additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the BCC Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the BCe office only after the BCe has acted to approve the
item)
Name of Primary Staff Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336
Contacl
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 Agenda Item Number ]60-\ C
Aooroved bv the BCC
Type of Document ~tf~e Defe'3:1~ement Number of Original I
Attached _IlL. " J Documents Attached
I.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages ITom ordinances.
resolutions, elc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages fTom
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Fi]son in the BCC office within 24 hours of Bee approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the Bee's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 02/1212008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Iicable.
Yes
(fnilial)
N/A(Not
A Ii cable)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
-:1(_
~/:>
-ilL
~
'=fL.
nla
j-iL.
'7fI-
I: Forms/ County Forms/ BeC Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
Return to
4134097 OR: 4334 PG: 1252
RECORDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. PL
01/19/1008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT B, BROCK. CLERK
REC PEE
COPIES
17.00
3.00
'Y)
\,
Frank Ramsey
Collier County HHS
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
EXT 1240
16DIQ
File# 08-130-IF
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this .2.1.. day of January, 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Vida Trainie Baltazard" (OWNER),
collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged. the Parties agree as follows:
I. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impacl fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the etfective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three
Hundred Seventv Two and 46/1 00 Dollars ($19,372.46). Repayment shall include any
accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of tive percent (5%) per annum. but in
no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibil "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land. and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law. regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner. lessee, tenant. mortgagee, or other person. except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County laxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of Ihis AgreemenI's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement. and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to Ihe OWNER. the COUNTY
OR: 4334 PG: 1253
. I . II h' t' . d f' I t' h' h 0 d1 6 D 10
may, at tts so e optIOn, co ect t e tmpact ee amount In e au t as set ort In t e r Inance,
or bring a civil aclion to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs. incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus inlerest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E.13ROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLL~OI~~^:
B ~ ' ~I
y: ~' L)')
---,..: HEN NO, CHAI~~
By:Jj U.U ~/*. tJ-u..,OL-
, Attest .s~, t C~erk
IttNtwt .1"
OWNER:
.~ //
-If. ' /:x:;~7 04/
Vida Trainie Baltaza;t?
OWNER:
Witn~ss.\rX 14
~ ~/1M
Print Name I j iI. 'l (')Q M <R )>
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
Thelotegoing
2008, by V, ir-
ent was \ll(knowledged before me this ;;? ~ay of
,\1\- V ( , who is personally known to me or
as proof of identity.
\b,''',"
r---.
,)'Iy f'U, '";":.J"\i'\rV'Jv'v'V,,.
.o\....~q:j!plRljlHJ SBJXfJj.\'
<J\t;yl." .11 ((l',I'd'\\!IJ\ 1)11' ',,~,; ~:.
-~'(,).."c/r ,\:'1,,' \,;',;.
n ture of Person Taking Acknowledgment
1-ll'~P.."(f,;
latzkow
tant County Attorney
:r'"' A:rA ~
../Marcy Krumbin, PA
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1254 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 164, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77,
inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
13423 Gemmer Road, Naples, Florida 34114
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type oflmpact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
B. Correctional Facilities Impacl Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
l. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
J. Water Impact Fee
K. Sewer Impact Fee
TOTAL IMP ACT FEES
JAK Approved ~/ ~/ ~
16D10
Amount Owed
$100.59
$62.08
$368.18
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$410.00
$171.61
$3,415.00
$3.515.00
$19,372.46
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 D 1
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 1
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original doculllent Original documents should he hand delivered 10 the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only aftl'r the [~oard has taken action on the item,)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
exccotion of the Chairman's signature, draw a line throu!!h routim~ lines # I through #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5)
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routine order)
I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service -Ii- ZllY
e-
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3_
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summaI)'. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the BeC Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the BCe office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff
Contacl
Agenda Date Item was
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager
Phone Number
252-2336
]6D-q
Yes
(Initial)
NIA (Not
A licable)
02/26/2008
Agenda Item Number
1i-
1ft
'--;'fi
lt'
nla
i~~rral Agreement
Number of Original
Documents Attached
7i.
~
I.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initia] the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a fO riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages lTom ordinances.
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except Ihe BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossib]y State Officia]s.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time lTame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines'
The document was approved hy the Bee on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable.
I: Fonns! County Forms! Bee Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1,26.05, Revised 2.24.05
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
'7
\;
Return to
4134098 OR: 4334 PG: 1255
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY. FL
01/1911008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK
REC PEE 17.00
COPIBS 3.00
Frank Ramsey
Collier County HHS
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples. Florida 34112
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROmCB 4TH FLOOR
EXT 7240
16D 11
File# 08-142-IF
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this _2, I day of January, 2007, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Jacqueline Jules" (OWNER),
collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Two
Hundred Seventv Four and 83/] 00 Dollars ($19,274.83). Repayment shall include any
accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in
no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
OR: 4334 PG: 1256
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordinlcP D 11
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROck, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
By:,:..llu..u ~.Q.(,.
Atttlt as to C I Y Clerk
i fgMtlII't 0111-
By:
w~esses: /\ 1\. _ /I
'::f ~~
Print Name M.o....-I-Wt. .j\;lll4raetb
OWNER:
tJar dill e. /, N ~ JU I~g
Jacqueline Jules
~~. cl:t=~
i ameJt'JIo\l"- (~Vl..f-,^-
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
OWNER:
2008,
regoing Agreeme t was acknowledged before me this ..2J.L day OfJ
~ , who is personally known to me has
as proof of Identity.
pn~!u;;ed
[NOTARIAL SEAL
O'~'"O'" AGNES ME~~
<Wi. MY COMMlSSlON. 2 2010
ES septemhel'\ ,
oJ>, 'if EXPIR: SCOU"I,0\s5OC.CO.
""loOf'f'-o:!'" Fl.NotaryDi
1_11(~1.:\.N01ARY
Jeffr
Chief
orm
Reco mend Approval:
i
/
~
arcy Krumbi
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
~:.o
,MPA
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1257 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
16D 11
Lot 142, Independence, Phase II-A, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 43, Pages 64 through 66,
inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
1512 Peace Way, Immokalee, Florida 34142
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type of Impact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
Amount Owed
TOT AL IMPACT FEES
$100.59
$113.53
$460.23
$935.00
$2.068.00
$8,228.00
$6,359.00
$725.00
$285.48
$19,274.83
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
1. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
JAK Approved ~ _1_
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
l6Dl2
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documellts should be hand deli....ered to the Board Offlcc. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
excention of the Chairman's sip-nature, draw a line through routing lines # I through #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routine order)
I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service ?YL ;/;iy
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Phone Number
Agenda Item Number
Number of Original
Documents Attached
252-2336
]6D-1 z...
Yes
(Initial)
N/A (Not
A licable)
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initia] the Yes column or mark UN/A" in the Not Applicab]e column. whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters. must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages trom ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages trom
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials,)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Fi]son in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable.
11-
<;4/
IIL-
~
11
Y'--
n/a
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
11--
I: Forms/ County Forms/ Bee Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
0;,
\I
Return to
4134099 OR: 4334 PG: 1258
RECORDED in OPPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. PL
01119/1008 at 01:10PM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
REC PEB 11.00
COPIES 3.00
Frank Ramsey
Collier County "US
3301 Eo Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROmCB 4TH FLOOR
EXT 7140
16D12
File# 08-138-IF
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this 3L day of January, 2007, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Jose Angel Olvera and Nora Beatriz
Olvera" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four
Hundred Fortv Two and 52/100 Dollars ($12,442.52). Repayment shall include any accrued
interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no
event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
OR: 4334 PG: 1259
16D12
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the Ordinance,
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
Attest: ,
DWIGHTE. BROCK, Clerk
BY:~~ rl~~
MtWL IS to ~1(.e ty perk
If9lllt..... onl-
By:
~~ 0Aa.rb
Print Name ~ ~ A.l.oIt:lr~
OWNER:
:r osG Af\<jel Olvef"q
Jose Angel Olvera
OWNER:
~C\ fudN~CUvq
Nora Beatriz Olvera
ST ATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
2008,
Th~of~greemeqt)Vas acknowledged before me this :3.L day of
by ~ 8t"'J;~ who IS personal
as roof of identity.
,
d
[NOT
....~ AGNES MENDOZA
....:uJ~ M.Y COMMISSION # OD594447
~p EXPIRe.',S",_'Z.ZOIO
"'O!'f',<+"". f1LNllWYDilCOUJltAs:;oc.Co.
1(1:-.' oMt
App
and 1
Recommend Approv
J effre
Chief
C--/
Y Krumbine, MPA
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
~\
'-P
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1260 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
16D12
Lot 19, Liberty Landing, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 47, Pages 71 through 73,
inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
3592 Liberty Way, Immokalee, FL 34142
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type of Impact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
Amount Owed
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
$100.59
$62.14
$368.18
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$410.00
$171.61
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
1. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
TOT AL IMPACT FEES
$12,442.52
JAK Approved .._/._1_
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP.16
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO D 13
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print all pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should he hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be Jilr\varded to the Board Office only arter the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or infonnation needed. If the document is already complete with the
exceotioll of the Chairman's si!'!nature, draw a line throue:h routimzlines # 1 throullh #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routinl7 order)
I.Frank: Ramsey Housing and Human Service # ?/?fS
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee ehaimlan 's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.)
Name of Primary Staff Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 Agenda Item Number 160-1.7.,
Aooroved bv the BCC
Type of Document Impf'it ~e Deferral Agreement N umber of Original I
Attached Documents Attached
J
I.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column. whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by tbe Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chainnan and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uircd.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines'
The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable.
Yes
(Initial)
N/A(Not
A licable)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1i
':Itt-
:r-re
7IC
n/a
';fL
I: Formsl County Forms! Bee Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
Return to
4134100 OR: 4334 PG: 1261
RECORDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY. FL
01/19/2008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLBRK
REC PEE 17.00
COPIES 3.00
'1]
V
Frank Ramsty
Collitr County HHS
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
Retn:
CLBRK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
EXT 7140
16D13
File# 08-148- IF
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this .1.- day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Islaine Georges" (OWNER),
collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
I. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "8." the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three
Hundred Seventv Two and 46/1 00 Dollars ($ I 9.372.46). Repayment shall include any
accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in
no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
OR: 4334 PG: 1262
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the orla6eD 13
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
BY:~. t~~lAOL-
,",It as to I ulY Clerk
11",aturt 00 r.
, .
.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROCK.Slerk
TOM HENNI G, CHAIRM
By:
~stM
Print Name~forhl
OWNER:
WJ~v~ Q~
Islaine Georges
OWNER:
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
2008,
The forel!oi~g Agreement was acknowledg~d before me this ---L- day of r: bnJ<"-'i '
by j.-, IQf/I~ (/(L"(4~-> , who IS personally known to me or has produced
. as proof of identity.
~~16
:* \i','{J\:\1i<,1\,,\;iil1:'jU:';'
~ '>~'?". . ~"'"' <. i ;!I.: -', ,:"::",:,":., .
....,r.~....V\,I'V'.... "..v.,/vv-.r./V'V"V"J"I.^I'\'
2, ,
-; " ,
~ .?I')n?/'/ .. /b/. ;/;;,AJ
Signature of Person Taking Acknowledgment
form
Rec
.....P
latzkow
nt County Attorney
Marcy Krumbine,
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1263 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 50, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77,
inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
13477 Koinonia Drive, Naples, Florida 34114
EXHIBIT "B"
IMP ACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type ofImpact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
J. Water Impact Fee
K. Sewer Impact Fee
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
JAKApproved~/_/_
16D13
Amount Owed
$100.59
$62.08
$368. I 8
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$410.00
$171.61
$3,4 I 5.00
$3,5 I 5.00
$19,372.46
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 16
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE . D 14
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original docurncnts should he hand Jclivcrcd to the Buard Oflkc The completed routmg slip and llnglllal
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the r~oard has l<:lkcn action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. lethe document is already complete with the
exception of the Chairman's signature, draw a line through routing lines # I through #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5)
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routing order)
I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service 11-. Zf-7 f:
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature arc to be delivered to the Bee office only atter the BCC has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager
Phone Number
252-2336
16D -It.j
Yes
(Initial)
N/A(Not
Ap licable)
Agenda Item Number
Number of Original
Documents Attached
11-
1L
7/-,
n/a
lmp
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exceplion of most letters, musl be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances.
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed hy all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossib] State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a lieable.
"1-1--
~
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
I: Formsl County Formsl BeC Fanusl Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
l)
V
4134101 OR: 4334 PG: 1264
RECORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL
02/19/1008 at 01:50FM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
REC PEE
COPIES
17.00
3,00
Return to
Retn:
CLBRK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
EXT 7140
J14
"'rank Ramsey
Collier County HHS
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
File# 08-082- IF
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this j~ day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Minouche Carilus" (OWNER),
collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date ofthe transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "8," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four
Hundred Forty Two and 46/100 Dollars ($12,442.46). Repayment shall include any accrued
interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no
event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
OR: 4334 PG: 1265
may, at its sole option, collect the impact tee amount in default as set forth in the 0~n&1J 14 l!\f
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deterred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROCK;Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER CO NTY, FLORIDA,
z/,7 (.f~ 't
BY:_~ ~~o.c.
at.tnt IS lfrk
,tOft.tlIrt 001-
By:
G, CHAIRM
Witnesses:
\.(Y\~ G~
Print Name f\Ac. r*ha \ \J cu'a...d 0
OWNER:
A';W7,Uk W~&I)
Minouche Carilus -
t'""" ~
' .
-qAA .
in~me Y; J '. AA'/k
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
OWNER:
2008,
s acknowledged before me this -4-- day of 9~~
who is personally known to me or has prod ed
as proof of identity.
App
and I
[NOTARIAL SEAL]
AGNES MENDOZA
MY COMMISSION # 00594447
EXPIRES: Sq>tembcr 12, 2010
l.NOtaryDiscount~Co.
ledgment
Recommend Appr val:
l
i
J effre
Chief
.Kl tz W
sista t County Attorney
arcy Krumbine
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
Jl-o
PA
-P
'.
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1266 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 26, Liberty Landing, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 47, Pages 71 through 73,
inclusive, ofthe Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
3624 Justice Circle, Immokalee, FL 34142
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type ofImpact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
8. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
JAKApproved~~_
Amount Owed
$100.59
$62.08
$368.18
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$410.00
$171.61
$12,442.46
16D14
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIt 6 D 15
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should he hand delivered 10 the Board Office The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only !!Jter the Board has taken action on the item,)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
excention of the Chainnan's signature, draw a line throuRh routine: lines # 1 throue:h #4, comolete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routinlJ order)
l.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service T/- Z/z 'K
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact infonnation is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature arc to be delivered to the BeC office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.)
Name of Primary Staff
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager
Phone Number
252-2336
160-1'5"
Yes
(Initial)
NIA (Not
A lieable)
Agenda Item Number
Number of Original
Documents Attached
-p
/1'-
Ti..
,#-..
nla
I.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column. whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman. with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossih] State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to Ihe Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the Bee's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed tbe chan es, if a licable.
R
11--.
~
,
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
I: Forms! County Forms! Bee Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03,04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24,05
V "J - Return to
Frank Ramsey
Collier County HDS
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples. Florida 34112
4134102 OR: 4334 PG: 1267
RBCORDED in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL
01119/1008 at 01:50FM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK
REC m 17.00
coms 3.00
File# 08-139-IF
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
EXT 7140
16015
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this lLday of January, 2007, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Samuel Trejo and Rebecca Castro"
(OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four
Hundred Fortv Two and 46/100 Dollars ($12,442.46). Repayment shall include any accrued
interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no
event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a releasc or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
OR: 4334 PG: 1268
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in t~ o~iflml, 5
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
By:- ~ fjt~O 4_C.(
, eput lerk
MtHt as to CM /I,
.tgllturt 001-
By:
OWNER:
Witnesses:
Y"\'\.o.JL. (ll,:,~
Print Name Mo('~.... 14\1/4{'4Jo
.f#H7bt/
Samuel Trejo
,
r~l')
~~
U
e cca Castro
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
[NOT AIU
.~ -
.LJ~' MY COMMISSION # 00594447
,,'fi/fIi'A WIRES' S",_12.2010
'..,C>>'~ FIl'lm..,D1IClJ,1l1IAstiOC.Co.
OlJ.J.NOTARY .
owledged before me this .x.. day of dlf,c,..y ,
ho is personally know III me or has produced
as proof of identity
The
2008, by
Reco end Appro 1:
~
4"
latzkow
tant County Attorney
Marcy Krumbine, MPA
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1269 ***
EXHIBIT" A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 27, Liberty Landing, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 47, Pages 71 through 73,
inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
3628 Justice Circle, Immoka1ee, FL 34142
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type of Impact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
1. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
JAK Approved ---.J.-! ~
16D15
Amount Owed
$100.59
$62.08
$368.18
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$410.00
$171.61
$12,442.46
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO D 16
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original docllment. Original docul1lents should be hand delivered to the Board Otllce. The completed routing slip and original
documents arc to be t()fwarded to the Board Office only after the f-3oard has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
exceotion of the Chairman's sie:nature, draw a line through routino lines # I through #4, comolete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routing order)
I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service 7ff-. ?/Z~
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONT ACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder afthe original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager
Contacl
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Phone Number
Agenda Item Number
Number of Original
Documents Attached
252-2336
]6D-ILo
Yes
(Initial)
NIA (Not
A licable)
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate,
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency, (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office oflhe County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines!
The doeument was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Iicable.
it
~
7i
~
nla
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7i
"7i----
I: Forms! County Forms! Bee Fonns/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised ].26.05, Revised 2.24.05
/'\..."
f \
\;'
Return to
4134103 OR: 4334 PG: 1270
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL
01/19/1008 at 02:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLBRK
REC PEE
COPIES
27.00
3.00
Frank Ramsey
Collier County HIlS
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
File# 08-140-IF
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEP.OmCE 4TH FLOOR
EXT 1140
16D16
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this ~ day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Emmanuel Louimare" (OWNER),
collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A"
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four
Hundred Forty Two and 46/100 Dollars ($12.442.46). Repayment shall include any accrued
interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no
event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Af,'reement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
OR: 4334 PG: 1271
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordiff?e, D 16
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIE~~~Y'F RIDA,.
By: .:J'fJI-
TOM HENNING, CHAIR
By;1).J..UJ.... ~tU LaC
Attest as to . ~lerk
.tlNtutt GIll ~
Witnesses:
'-'\i \Qd if', C~L.'("c< olc,
Print Name ~\C'I~Ir,'" -A Ivo, ,,,,,L
OWNER:
~rn--=<<?Z /,y"L ~~
mmanuel Louimare
wi~se~: . / ) +
~eA t.] ~';-I~~4-"-M..
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
2008, ~:~i,~~;:tZ~~:s a~~:~~g~~ b~:~~~n~~vth~i1t~a:~f bed
-asproof of i denti ty.
OWNER:
Q ~y COMMISSION 'DDS92~1~
~ EXPIRES: September \2. Co
~OFf\.~ Fl,NOIal)'DIS(;OUlIIAzsOC.'
1.jl(~I.,_NOTAllS
Appr
and 1
tzkow
sist t County Attorney
cy Krumbine,
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
--
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1272 ***
EXHIBIT" A"
16D16
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 30, Liberty Landing, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 47, Pages 71 through 73,
inclusive, ofthe Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
3640 Justice Circle, Immokalee, FL 34142
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type of Impact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
Amount Owed
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
$100.59
$62.08
$368.18
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$410.00
$171.61
$12,442.46
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
1. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
JAK Approved -.! --.!_
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIPl
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 6 D 17
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Oflicc. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dales, and/or information needed. lethe document is already complete with the
exceotion of the Chairman's sillIlature, draw a line throue.h TOuting lines # 1 through #4, comolete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routinv order)
l.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service 7f-- z/2 r-
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder afthe original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature arc to be delivered to the BCe office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager
Phone Number
252-2336
l6D_I:t
Yes
(Initial)
N/A (Not
A licable)
Agenda l1em Number
Number of Original
Documents Attached
11L
'"TI-
1~
,(
7L
n/a
I.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column. whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by lhe Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by lhe Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except lhe BCC
Chairman and Clerk to lhe Board and ossibl State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all olher arties exce t lhe BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval ofthe
document or lhe final ne otiated contract date whichcver is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or lhe BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Ijcable.
7/lL-
1: Forms! County Forms/ Bce Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Return to
4134104 OR: 4334 PG: 1273
RECORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. F1
01/19/1008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E, BROCK. CLERK
REC PEE
COPIES
17.00
3.00
~
V
Frank Ramsey
Collier County HHS
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
File# 08-153-IF
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
EXT 7140
26D17
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this ~ day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Passiana Belizaire" (OWNER),
collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four
Hundred Forty Two and 46/100 Dollars ($12,442.46). Repayment shall include any accrued
interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no
event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
OR: 4334 PG: 1274
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordin~c~ D 1 7
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
Attest: , "
DWIGHT E. BROCK:, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIERYUNTY, F ORIDA,.
By: :J'fft JIft
TOM HENNING, CHAI
By: ~Clt.u 1 ~r- {'Ie .
, D ty Clerk
Att.Jt, as to . I nun ~
Itgutur'e 001-
"
OWNER:
'~711 S"J ";J d'1t
Passiana Belizaire
i =;,;:'th/JI ([3'
OWNER:
Witnesses; 0 d.
=-1y~~,~~^~>
Print ame ',. (l)YalJ-
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
2008,
The foregoing Agreement was acknowledged before me this M day of 4.AAA..-:iGfe: '
~~ "A~IJ"" ']\ e, If'"A I ,who is personally known to me or has pro ed
as proof of identity.
OTARIAL SEAL]
#!'''''' VIRGINIA CANW
);J. MY COMMISSION' D0594425
~ EXPIRES, SqlladNr 12. 2010
I NOTARY FJ,Notay[)bQgtAa1:.Co.
Appro d s form
and
Si
Jeffrey
Chief A
Reco mend Approval:
cy Krumbi ,MPA
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
""p
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1275 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
16 D 17
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 35, Liberty Landing, according to tbe plat tbereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 47, Pages 7] through 73,
inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
3660 Justice Circle, Immokalee, FL 34]42
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type ofImpact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
Amount Owed
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
$100.59
$62.08
$368.18
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$410.00
$171.61
$12,442.46
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
1. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
JAK Approved-1_/_
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 n
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 18
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
excention of the Chairman's sit:mature, draw a line throuoh routimllines # ] through #4, comnlete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5),
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routinp' order)
I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service 4- Z[z '?"
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder afthe original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact infonnation is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact statffor additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the BCC Chainnan'5 signature arc to be delivered to the BCe office only after the BCe has acted to approve the
item.
Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager
Phone Number
252-2336
16D -I.
Yes
(Initial)
N/A (Not
A licable)
02/26/2008
Agenda Item Number
11--.
'7i
7-L
'7-/-.
7tt-
n/a
act Fee Deferral Agreement
Number of Original
Documents Attached
-w--
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicab]e column. whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a Ii cable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC oflice within 24 hours ofBCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a [icable.
I: Fonns! County Fonus/ BCe Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised J .26.05, Revised 2.24,05
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Return to
4134105 OR: 4334 PG: 1276
RBCORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL
01/19/1008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK
REC PEE 17.00
COPIES 3.00
{'l
Frank Ramsey
Collier County HHS
3301 E. Tamjaml Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
Retn
CLBRK TO THE BOARD
INTEROmCB 4TH FLOOR
EXT 7140
16D18
File# 08-144-IF
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this -L day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Jose Penaloza Jasso and Aracely
Penaloza" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four
Hundred Forty Two and 46/100 Dollars ($12,442.46). Repayment shall include any accrued
interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no
event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 D
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 19
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
excention afthe Chairman's sionature, draw a line throuoh routing lines # 1 throuoh #4, comn!ete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
~oute to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
List in routine: order)
l.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service -%- 7/2 'is
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager
Phone Number
252-2336
160 -19
Yes
(Initial)
N/A(Not
A licable)
Agenda Item Number
ct Fee Deferral Agreement
. lD
Number of Original
Documents Attached
1i-
'TI--
7-;L.
=tt..
71-
nla
I.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chainnan, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chainnan and Clerk to the Board and ossib]y State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chainnan's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the
document or the tinal ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriale pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contra~ts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Fi]son in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCe's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable.
~.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
I: Forms/ County Forms! Bee Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised] .26.05, Revised 2.24.05
/y)
\;
Return to
4134106 OR: 4334 PG: 1279
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
01/19/2008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK
REC PEE
COPIES
27.00
3.00
Frank Ramsey
Collier County HHS
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
File# 08-081-IF
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
EXT 7240
16D19
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this -I-- day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Miguel Angel Gaspar Francisco"
(OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four
Hundred Forty Two and 46/100 Dollars ($12.442.46). Repayment shall include any accrued
interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no
event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
o1her security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
OR: 4334 PG: 1280
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordin~~ D 19
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E: BROCK, Clerk
~- .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER C UNTY, F ORillA,
.
By~: It.u...ti ~O.(.
Attut as "t- perk
.1...... 0111-
By:
Witnesses:
'-\,\o.u~(, 0. Q.vr:.^ts"d.c..
Print Name ~\C\ c \-\'0- \ v (.lInn"
OWNER:
iJ1~ ~~1 ~t:r
Migue Angel Gaspar Franci 0
OWNER:
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
Th~o~~ent was ~wledged before me this -1- day of ~,
2008, by ~ ~ ~" who is personally known ~o me or has pr uced
-as proof of IdentIty. .
owledgment
Q MYCOMMISSION'DDS9441~
~ EXPIRE:'> ~-o1<<nber12.20
'OI-r:/ P\.t<lQliI'Yi)lljG(I'.lnl~CO.
L'-':Io)4'lOTAAY
.L~
Appro
and Ie
Jeffre
Chief A
arcy Krumbine,
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1281 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
l6D19
Lot 22, Liberty Landing, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 47, Pages 71 through 73,
inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
3608 Justice Circle, Immokalee, FL 34142
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type ofImpact Fee
Amount Owed
A. EMS Impact Fee
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
l. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
$100.59
$62.08
$368.18
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$410.00
$171.61
$12,442.46
JAK Approved ___I_j_
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 D2 "".
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO C
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should he hand delivered to the Board Offke. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item,)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
excention of the Chairman's silYnature, draw a line throuQh routing lines # 1 throup"h #4, comnlete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
~oute to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
List in routin'" order)
I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service fi- Z/Zr
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be deljvered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager
Phone Number
252-2336
16D -"2.-0
Yes
(Initial)
N/A (Not
A licable)
Agenda Item Number
Number of Original
Documents Attached
'1L
n1a
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column. whichever is
a ro riate,
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters. must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages fTom ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sigh here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 02/1212008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable.
Tt-
71--.
I: Fonns! County Forms! Bce Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Return to
4134107 OR: 4334 PG: 1282
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL
02/29/2008 at 02:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK
REC FEE 27.00
COPIES 3.00
\;7
Frank Ramsey
ColUer County HHS
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
File# 08-141-IF
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
ElT 7240
16 D 20
This space for recording
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this -I- day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Jean Vital Astreide and Marie
Astreide" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
I. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four
Hundred Forty Two and 52/1 00 Dollars ($12.442.52). Repayment shall include any accrued
interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no
event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
OR: 4334 Pl: 1283
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordinan~, D 20
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
Attest: ..
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER CO NTY, FL RillA,
By:_Cl.t.t.u. Jf/~J'(),('
-u.._-t' ., uty Clerk
ft~~.' Ch4 t
.ttHtwt 0lI1-
By:
Witnesses:
'-....\.'{\(M :I; ii, OJ.! , '. n , o..J-
Print Name \-.\0\ \'N>. A \Jurc-,l,
OWNER: '~
~ \l. fI-/J t~o1C^-
Jean Vital Astreide
OWNER:
+-
Marie Astreide
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
ged before me this 1 day of ~
is personally known to me or has pro ced
as pr f of identity.
[NOTARIAL SEAL
, 'ENDOZA
AGNES lV' 0594441
MY COMM\SSlON~~\2, 20\0
EXP\RES'.sevte:\1 \~Co.
f\-:I f\.l'lClIa>1J:hsC01'"
,
Jeffre . K zkow
Chief A ist t County Attorney
...R
ar Krumbine,
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1284 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
16 D 20
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 10, Liberty Landing, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 47, Pages 71 through 73,
inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
3556 Liberty Way, Immokalee, FL 34142
EXHIBIT "8"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type of Impact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
Amount Owed
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
$100.59
$62.14
$368.18
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$410.00
$171.61
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
$12,442.52
JAK Approved __i_l_
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 1 6
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO D 21
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be lorwarcted to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
excention of the Chairman's sip-nature, draw a line throul!h routing: lines # I throuQ"h #4, comnlete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5),
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routina order)
l.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service %- Z-/ Z-K'
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval, Normal1y the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the BeC Chairman's signature arc to be delivered to the BCC office only after the BCe has acted to approve the
item.'
Name of Primary Staff Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 Agenda Item Number 16D_2[
Annroved bv the BCC
Type of Document ~~~ Agreement Number of Original I
Attached Documents Attached
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/ A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chainnan, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages /Tom ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages /Tom
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chainnan and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chainnan and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval ofthe
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chainnan's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of Bce approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time /Tame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
Tbe document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all cbanges made during
tbe meeting bave been incorporated in the attached document. Tbe County Attorney's
Office has reviewed tbe cban es, if a licable.
Yes
(Initial)
NIA (Not
A licable)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
71--
'{i.
q-L
~
'#-
nla
--:1L
I: Formsl County Formsl BCC Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
OR: 4334 PG: 1285
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
02/29/2008 at 02:50PM D~IGHT E, BROCK. CLERK
REC PEE
coms
\;1;
4134108
Return to
Frank Ramsey
HHS
3301 ~ Tamiami Trail
Naplf:'!, FL 34HZ
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
This spa~JVrJJ!.Qg
File# 08-119-IF
LIEN AGREEMENT WITH DEVELOPER FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF
COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE
HOUSING DWLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this ~ day of January, 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Freeman and Freeman, Ioe:'
(DEVELOPER). collectively stated as the "Parties:'
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall
apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from issuance of this Agreement until six (6) months after
issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the dwelling unit(s).
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon the sale of
the dwelling unit(s), unless the dwelling units are sold to households meeting the criteria set
forth in the Ordinance, and the impact fees are duly deferred. As set forth in Exhibit "B," the
amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three Hundred Five and 88/100
Dollars ($19.305.88).
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A;' which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit(s). The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed from. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage
or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any O\~mer, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien
shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same, including, but not limited to. a full or partial
release of lien.
7. In the event the DEVELOPER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the
default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the DEVELOPER, a
delinquency fee equal to ten percent (10%) of the total impact fee imposed shall be assessed,
and the COUNTY may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default and
assessment as set forth in the Ordinance, or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or
Page I 01"2
27.00
3,00
16 D 21
OR: 4334 PG: 1286
declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The
COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs,
incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum
statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar day basis until paid. DEVELOPER will
sell the unit to persons whose legal status will be verified. documented and kept on file at the
otT1ce of Housing and Human Services. If the developer fails to comply with the tenns of the
agreement, or the unit ceases to be utilized for affordable housing, or is not sold to legal
residents. the full amount of deferred impact fees shall be immediately repaid to the County,
including all applicable interest and penalties.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the DEVELOPER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year
first above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk
SIONERS
By: _lLu-u ~~_oLIlY
~It IS to 1 tyflerk
S19Hturt 0111 ~
Dev~D~', ,-~ ""'-7
Witnesses: 2 :tZ~
Pri~f!::,54 a :k:~/ :l n " e J By: ~reeman
~ 'rn ~ Title: President
Print N~~fU'.J. J1i,'J~
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The toregoing instrumcntAgreement was acknowledged before me this ~ day of
January, 2008, by Ernest Freeman~sident for Freeman and Freeman, Inc. who is
personally known to me or has produced ~ ~ identification. . /J
[NOTARIAL SEAL] ~_iU. &JC<d {l{. 'tL-o--
(Signature OfJfJotj Public)
!l{/~f J Il V' (. /l1. '
(Print Name of Notary Public)
MARGARET M. lEE
NOTARYPUBuc. STAT! OF FlORIDA
COMMISSION # OD305112
EXPIRES 6129/2008
8ONOED THRlJ 1-JV\!l-M'lTA:I1Y,
/.. (..-e-
~\
-
Marcy Krumbine, irector of
Housing & Human Services
Page2of2
7.~ D21
Wi
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1287 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Section 33, Township 46S, Range 29E Comm NE Cr of Lot 20 Blk 29 New Market Subd,
Thence NELY alg N Ii of Escambia St., Extended 80 ft to E Bdy Li of Madison Ave to POB,
Thence alg N Bdy Li of Escambia 300ft, NWL Y & Parell with Madison Ave 500ft to S Li of
F1ager St. Ext, SWL Y alg E Bdy Li of Flager St. 300 ft to intersect of Flager St. & Madison
Ave. SELY alg E Bdy Li of Madison Ave 500ft to NLY Bdy Li of Escambia to POB, less OR
375 pg 141, OR 374 pg 292, OR 374 pg 310, OR 374 pg 298, OR 376 pg 674, OR 374 pg 141,
OR 374 pg 304, OR 316 pg 161, OR 402 pg 510-511, OR 402 pg 505, OR 402 pg 493-494, OR
402 pg 487-488, OR 567 pg 799, Collier County, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
303 Calle Amistad Street, Immokalee, Florida 34142
EXHIBIT "'B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type of Impact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
Amount Owed
$100.59
$144.58
$460.23
$935.00
$2.068.00
$8.228.00
$6,359.00
$725.00
$285.48
$19,305.88
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
JAKApproved_/_I_
J 5 D 21
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 1 6 D 2 2
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Ollice, The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
exccntion of the Chairman's sip-nature, draw a line through routing lines # I through #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in roulin!! order)
l.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service 7?-- Z/zrt
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
(The primary contact is the holder afthe original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact infonnation is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
infonnation. All original documents needing the BeC Chairman's signanue are to be delivered to the BeC office only after the BCe has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro nate.
I. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.)
2. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
3. The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
4. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
5. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. -:::L/
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain ./ f---
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
6. The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
.the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's
Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable.
PRIMARY CONT ACT INFORMATION
Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager
Phone Number
Agenda Item Number
Fee Deferral Agreement
Number of Original
Documents Attached
252-2336
16D - Z,z..
Yes
(Initial)
11---
TR- nla
1: Fonns/ County Forms/ Bee Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
4134109
1"7
V
Return to
OR: 4334 PG: 1288
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL
02/29/2008 at 02:10PM D~IGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
RE C FEE
COPIES
27,00
3.00
Frank Ramsey
HHS
3301 E Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Retn:
CLERK TO THE BOARD
INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR
,,",p.J!Ul,!&. 1 6 D 2 2
LIEN AGREEMENT WITH DEVELOPER FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF
COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE
HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this Z.1~y of January, 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Freeman and Freeman, Inc,"
(DEVELOPER). collectively stated as the "Parties:'
NOW. THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
File# 08-135-IF
Collier County. Florida. known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event afany conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall
apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from issuance of this Agreement until six (6) months after
issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the dwelling unit(s).
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon the sale of
the dwelling unit(s), unless the dwelling units are sold to households meeting the criteria set
forth in the Ordinance, and the impact fees are duly deferred. As set forth in Exhibit "B:' the
amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three Hundred and 01/100 Dollars
($19.300.0 I).
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit(s). The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned. or otherwise
conveyed from. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage
or other security interest. this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien
shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements. COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same, including. but not limited to. a full or partial
release of lien.
7. In the event the DEVELOPER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the
default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the DEVELOPER, a
delinquency fee equal to ten percent (10%) of the total impact fee imposed shall be assessed,
and the COUNTY may. at its sole option. collect the impact fee amount in default and
assessment as set forth in the Ordinance, or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or
Page I 01'2
OR: 4334 PG: 1289
declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The 1 6 D 2 2
COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs.
incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum
statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar day basis until paid. DEVELOPER will
sell the unit to persons whose legal status will be verified, documented and kept on tile at the
office of Housing and Human Services. If the developer fails to comply with the terms of the
agreement, or the unit ceases to be utilized for affordable housing, or is not sold to legal
residents, the full amount of deferred impact fees shall be immediately repaid to the County,
including all applicable interest and penalties.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the DEVELOPER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year
first above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk
fjrt
By: ~ () 1.11 J :t~Lr)~ ~y:
. D ty Clerk
Attest as to 11'Mt1 S
.t...~ CNI1.
Witnesses:
By:
Em reeman
Title: President
j)LI\
'\bflA
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrumentAgreement was acknowledged before me this ~ day of
January, 2008, by Ernest Freeman as President for Freeman and Freeman, Inc. who is
personally known to me or has produced M..4 identification.
L
[NOTARIAL SEAL]
(Signature Not"'7 Public)
/JIa.rg A. rL f /t1. 1. e. .e..-
(Print Name of Notary Public)
NOt MARGARET M LEe
C~'M~L'C. STATE 0, FlORroA
"n~~I~~~~~gg~112
.', '., ','. . <>...,. 'Y"~'!,!?"
d
A~
......P
. arc Krumbine, Dire t of
Housing & Human Services
Page 2 of2
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1290 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
16D22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 18, Pine Grove Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 2, Page
103, Public R<<ords for Collier County, Florida
STREET ADDRESS
420 Carver Street, Immokalee, Florida 34142
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type ofImpact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
Amount Owed
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
$100.59
$138.71
$460.23
$935.00
$2,068.00
$8.228.00
$6.359.00
$725.00
$285.48
$19,300.01
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
1. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
JAK Approved _/_1
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 1
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 6 D 2 3
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
exceDtion of the Chairman's si!!:nature, draw a line throue.h routim!: lines # I throu2h #4, comolcte the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
! (Ust in rautinp' order)
I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service -::;t. '"'j-'t
e" L
2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact infonnation is needed in the event one of the addressees above. including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the BCe Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the BCe office only after the BeC has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column. whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions bave been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. 0/
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain ; IlG
time frame or the BCe's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during
the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's R
Oflice has reviewed the chan es, if a Iicable.
Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager
Phone Number
252-2336
l6D - 2-=<:
Yes N/A(Not
(Initial) A licable)
:fL.
';fL n1a
I: Forms! County Forms! BCC Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
Agenda Item Number
Number of Original
Documents Attached
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
--.. -~._,~, ,_"-~>,""".,-;-~."-~.~..----".........,..~.~..~......."",,,---,,"'~"~--',..._,_....,--._'"
4134110 OR: 4334 PG: 1291
RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER CODNTY. FL
02/29/2008 at 02:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK
REC FBi
coms
27.00
3.00
Return to
Retn:
CLERK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
EXT 7240
Frank Ramsey
Collier County HUS
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples. Florida 34112
File# 08-1S0-IF
This space for recording
16D23
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT
FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS
This Agreement is entered into this ~ day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Robert Martinez and Juani Martinez"
(OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties."
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance"
(Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance
shall apply.
2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A."
3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid.
4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the
sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing ofthe dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead
exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real
property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY
not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set
forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four
Hundred Fortv Two and 46/100 Dollars ($12.442.46). Repayment shall include any accrued
interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no
event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) ofthe total fee amount.
5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien
may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this
Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall
terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the
County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither
the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise
conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or
other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in
the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this
lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes.
6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record
any necessary documentation evidencing same.
7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default
is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY
~
OR: 4334 PG: 1292
16D23
may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the Ordinance,
or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deterred impact fees are
then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover
all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing
this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on
a calendar year basis until paid.
8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest.
9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the
COUNTY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first
above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROck, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLI.JUNTY, ORIDA,
By: ,:JfJL
TOM HENNING, CHAIR
By:~ ~~.I. ,(LC
'Attest IS to t)'lClerk
'1glllt..... on 1 ·
Witnesses:
'-f\ '\ w...lli C&J (,.. u.J-o
Print Name ~\ct( \>\<"" !-\ 100,e..1",
OWNER:
~()J\.{~~
Juani Martinez
STATE OF FL IDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
Sig
of Person Taklllg Acknowledgment
2008,
AL
e~ AGNES MENDOZA
~ MY COMMISSION # 00594447
~",:,.r EXPIRES. S""'"'^" 12. 2010
1"IXj..).NOTARY Fl. NOIary DiSOOmt Assoc. Co.
ounty Attorney
J;;;;(" L -
....-M cy Krumbin ,~A
Director
Collier County Housing and Human Services
Jeffrey .
Chief As
*** OR: 4334 PG: 1293 ***
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 34, Liberty Landing, according to the plat thereof,
as recorded in Plat Book 47, Pages 71 throngh 73,
inclusive, of the Pu blic Records of Collier Connty, Florida.
STREET ADDRESS
3656 Justice Circle, Immokalee, FL 34142
EXHIBIT "B"
IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN
Type ofImpact Fee
A. EMS Impact Fee
B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee
C. Library Impact Fee
D. Community Parks Impact Fee
E. Regional Parks Impact Fee
F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee
G. Road Impact Fee
H. Government Buildings Impact Fee
I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee
TOTAL IMPACT FEES
JAKApproved~_I_
16D23
Amount Owed
$100.59
$62.08
$368.18
$750.00
$1,659.00
$2,862.00
$6,059.00
$410.00
$171.61
$12,442.46
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 E' '
, TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTs SENT TO 2
TEE BOARD OF COUNTY COMl\1ISSIONERS OmCE FOR SIGNATURE ,,'
Prlnl: on pink pap.... Altld1la original "~_r Original "~-.. slIould be baad dmivered la 1lIe Boaro. Office.. Thecomplet<d lOU..g ,lip and original
--"""labe1Crwmled.la1lleBoudOffia:cmly~1boBoudhasllli:ell.acl!oII.0I11l1ei-.) , , , ,', "
, . . ROUTING SLIP
Comp.... rtl1ttiI1g IiDe:I 'llbrcugh 1#4 as ~ fer addiliaW ';Il"'~ dales, mdlor iafoxmadon Deedcd..Jf 1lIe rl"""':'_;is >ircIdy compleo: with 1lIe
. ~tica.ot-tbe~'! . dr1w .Iin. rllroalll MIllie. ..... #lllIroulth 1#4, =....1lIe cbccl:Iist and forward la S... fllson (line ffl.
Route to Addressee(s) . Office Initials Date
(Lisr in ,ow:ilu. crdcrl ].5;'---'
l. ,--=
/.-/./ ,
2.
" ,
.
3. .,
4.
C'.
5. Sue FIlson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners .
6. Minutes and Records ClerIc of Court's Office -
\,.'.'
PRIMARY CONTACT- INFORMA nON
(The primmy _ is the bolder of the origillal documclt pOllding Bee approval. NClDll1l!y the primmy COI1OlCt is tho pcooo _ ClC:lIl:dIpn:pa the executive
SlUIlISIlIIy, Primary = infomwion is aoodod ;., the .VOlll _ 0( 1lIe <1ddm:s= abave, il1cJudiog Suo Mlsoo, lIOCd '" cpotlCt sat! for odditioaa.l or otis3ing
infomwico. All original dccumoolS ooodil1g.... Bee 0Wrma0', siplllIO'" '" b. dolivorod '" 1lIe Bee ollie: only afIor tho Bce has _ '" approve <be
imm.)
Name of Primary Staff J-y > . / Phon. Number 7 .3
Contacl , Ie 0..-_.z iC" r: /
,. \- __._-> (..\L......,'.,
Agenda Dale Irem was '.,,) Agcnda lrem Number /C" ,::1
Armmved bv the BCC c,,) ",.-) (,.. , t.:
Type ofDocumenl , , /)/, ,., ,,2> Number of Original ,,;.;. - / _'--"_C;:'
Atlached .) e Cd.l L:J Do=ents Aaached
.// .
It ^_ {- y
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N1 A. in the Not Applicable column. whichever is
Ie.
1., Original documem has been signcd/"mirialed fer legal sUfficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman. with the exception of most Ie=. must be reviewed aIJd signed
tiy the Oflice of the County Ar1rJrney. This includes signature pages from ordinances.
resolutions. ele. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
conlraclS. agrecmcnrs. Clc. that have been fa1ly =uted by all parties except the BCC
Oairman aIJd Clerk: to the Board aIJd ssibl SlalC Officials.)
2. All iwldwritten,Slri.Ice-through and revisions have been initialed by the County ~y.' s
Office aIJd all other artias I the BCC Chairman aIJd the Clerk to the Board
3. The n.'n-,:..n's signature line dale has beca entered as the dare ofBCC approval of the
documem or the final DC tiated contt:lCl dale wbichever is licable.
4. "Sign here" labs are p~ on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si aIJd initials are
5. In most cases (some conttaclS are an exception), the original documenl aIJd this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive aIJd reqaiIe 'forwarding to T.I1.h"~ee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be a of our n~.,n;nes!
6. The document was approved by the BCe 00 ~ 0.' ""(enter dale) and all c:hanges
made during the meeting bave been incorporated in the attached docnmenl. The
Conn Attorn's OfliC8 has ...viewed the as, if a Iicable.
tv 1
Yes
(Initial)
" -f'\.....
~/'/~
..~ .
~ _ County _ Bee _ Origillal DccumcIls Rccliag Slip WWS Origim.l9,03,04, R.vi.scd 1.26,05. Revised 2.24.05
MEMORANDUM
Date:
August 8, 2008
To:
Michael Dowling, Property Management Specialist
Real Estate Services
From:
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Second Amendment To LeaseAgreement
Attached for your records is one copy of each amendment, referenced above
(Agenda Item #16E2) approved by the Board of County Commissioners
on Tuesday, February 26, 2008.
The Minutes and Records Department has kept the third original lease agreement
for the Board's permanent record.
If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-8411.
Thank you.
Attachments
16E2
16[2
Lease #880
SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT entered into this ~ day of
~lJi._L'-.>. , 2008 at Naples, Collier County, Florida by and between Alan and
Patricia Boole, as signed to A & P Boole, LLC, by way of an Assignment of Lease dated April 4,
2007, whose mailing address is 470 Lagoon Avenue, Naples, Florida 34108, hereinafter referred to
as "LESSOR," and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose
mailing address is 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112, hereinafter referred to as
"LESSEE,"
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, Collier County and A & P Boole, LLC, Boole have previously entered into a Lease
Agreement dated July 31, 2001, and a First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated December 14,
2004;
WHEREAS, the LESSOR and LESSEE are desirous of amending the Lease Agreement;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements provided within said Lease
Agreement dated July 31, 2001, and Ten Dollars ($10,00) and other valuable consideration, said
Lease Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
1. The following provision shall be added to Article 2 of the Lease Agreement:
This Lease is hereby extended until March 1, 2009, hereinafter referred to as "Extended
Lease Term,"
LESSEE is granted the option, provided it is not in default of any of the terms of this Lease,
to renew this Lease for one (1) additional one (1) year terms under the same terms and conditions as
provided for in the Lease dated July 31, 2001, hereinafter referred to as "Extended Renewal Term,"
LESSEE shall be granted the right to terminate the Lease at any time, with or without cause,
by providing a thirty-day written notice of such termination to LESSOR at the address set forth in
Article 1 0 of the Lease dated July 31, 2001. Said notice period shall commence upon placement of
the written notice in an official depository of the United States Post Office, Registered or Certified
Mail, postage prepaid, or by personal delivery or overnight delivery service,
2. The annual rent for the Extended Lease Term shall be increased by four percent from the
previous year's rent and shall be increased by four percent for the Extended Renewal Term, should
the LESSEE elect to renew this Lease,
3, Except as expressly provided herein, the Lease Agreement between Alan and Patricia Boole
and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, for the utilization of the Demised
Premises described in said Lease Agreement dated July 31, 2001, remains in full force and effect
according to the terms and conditions contained therein, and said terms and conditions are
applicable hereto except as expressly provided otherwise herein,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the LESSOR and LESSEE have hereto executed this First
!1..
(Print Name)
,
G(f~u:'\ ~\ZUcuJ
(Print Name)
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
~rt~.~.~~
Jennifer A. Belpe '0
Assistant County Attorney
16E2
BY: ;f4~~~
A-.. (J <3 avl.-t: I /.-t..- c.:
ALAN BOOLE ( 1V\ei"\q,E:<<.
~
.~-. )
\ /
BY: ~.~.~ s~.'-,
A ~ Q (Soo.....Q L..L-(..... .~
I
PATRICIA BOOLE rt(:;:Mg.fR..
I
16[2
Lease #848
SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT
J THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT entered into this"J 0 day of
,<...6.cA_'U.J'f~ ' 2008 at Naples, Collier County, Florida by and between Alan and
Patricia Boole, as signed to A & P Boole, LLC, by way of an ASSignment of Lease dated April 4,
2007, whose mailing address is 470 Lagoon Avenue, Naples, Florida 34108, hereinafter referred to
as "LESSOR," and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose
mailing address is 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112, hereinafter referred to as
"LESSEE,"
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, Collier County and A & P Boole, LLC, Boole have previously entered into a Lease
Agreement dated December 15, 1998, and a First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated December
14,2004;
WHEREAS, the LESSOR and LESSEE are desirous of amending the Lease Agreement;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements provided within said Lease
Agreement dated December 15, 1998, and Ten Dollars ($10,00) and other valuable consideration.
said Lease Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
1. The following provision shall be added to Article 2 of the Lease Agreement:
This Lease is hereby extended until March 1, 2009, hereinafter referred to as "Extended
Lease Term,"
LESSEE is granted the option, provided it is not in default of any of the terms of this Lease,
to renew this Lease for one (1) additional one (1) year terms under the same terms and conditions as
provided for in the Lease dated December 15, 1998, hereinafter referred to as "Extended Renewal
Tenn."
LESSEE shall be granted the right to terminate the Lease at any time, with or without cause,
by providing a thirty-day v,Titten notice of such termination to LESSOR at the address set forth in
Article 10 of the Lease dated December 15, 1998, Said notice period shall commence upon
placement of the written notice in an official depository of the United States Post Otlice, Registered
or Certified Mail, postage prepaid, or by personal delivery or overnight delivery service,
2, The annual rent for the Extended Lease Term shall be increased by four percent from the
previous year's rent and shall be increased by four percent for the Extended Renewal Term, should
the LESSEE elect to renew this Lease,
3, Except as expressly provided herein, the Lease Agreement between Alan and Patricia Boole
and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, for the utilization of the Demised
Premises described in said Lease Agreement dated December 15, 1998, remains in full force and
effect according to the terms and conditions contained therein, and said terms and conditions are
applicable hereto except as expressly provided otherwise herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the LESSOR and LESSEE have hereto executed this First
(Print Name)
Gr~
(Print Name)
~W?UoV
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
iJ(J. ~-~ ~
Assistant County Attorney
16E2
flY ~ /IV
A 4: P oDLf- f G.-c.-
ALAN BOOLE (VI€-fi\.be1
I
BY \&C5LQ, ~<=-
A ~ r bcou; U-c- .
I
PATRICIA BOOLE (YIe.(V\.b.e-f
16 E 4 ""Y
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
March 7, 2008
TO:
Lynn Wood, Contract Specialist
Purchasing Department
FROM:
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes and Records Department
RE:
Contract: 08-5012
"Cellular Communications Services & Equipment"
Contractor: Sprint Solutions, Inc.
Enclosed are two (2) original contract documents, as referenced above
(Agenda Item #16E4) approved by the Board of County Commissioners on
Tuesday, February 26, 2008.
Minutes & Records Department has retained an original copy.
If you should have any questions, you may contact me at 252-8411.
Thank you,
Enclosures (2)
ITEM NO.:~;P\2...('.cO & SC)
FILE NO.:
.. .. . ," \'V'>L DATE
r'\J\-. ':II . ',' ''t,'
:.\ '~~T'{ f:\ll'O~\U
. ,\))1
Ii f'. \ 3
10n~ ~~R -0 p. V'
"",-,
RECEIVED:
,-......,.
ROUTED TO:
DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS LINE
REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES
Date: March 5, 2008
To: Office of the County Attorney
Attention: Robert Zachary
From: Lyn M. Wood, C.P.M., Contract Specialist ::t!
Purchasing Department, Extension 2667 U~
Re: Contract: 08-5012 "Cellular Communications Services & Equipment"
Contractor: Sprint Solutions, Inc.
BACKGROUND OF REQUEST:
This contract was approved by the BCC on February 26, 2008,
Agenda Item 16.EA
This item has not been previously submitted.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Contract review and approval.
OTHER COMMENTS:
Robert, upon approval, please forward to BCC for signature. If there
are any questions concerning the document, please contact me. Purchasing
would appreciate notification when the documents exit your office. Thank you.
C: Scott Johnson, Purchasing
6C.(Vl/2-
3 - '1--6 'if
16E4
,'\"~":~)
""",r"n.
,.,.,,'C1
16E4
FROM:
0-47'('
R('e
Jeff Walker R At4,f _ "('lv('O
Risk Management Department IS,f ,.?fJtJQ>
Lyn M. Wood, C.P.M., Contract specialist) A _ ~,y~
Purchasing Department UXr
March 5, 2008
MEMORANDUM
TO:
DATE:
RE: Review Insurance for Contract 08-5012 "Cellular
Communications Services & Equipment"
Contractor: Sprint Solutions, Inc.
This Contract was approved by the BCC on February 26, 2008, Agenda Item
16.EA
Please review the Insurance Certificates for the above referenced contract. If
everything is acceptable, please forward to the County Attorney for further
review and approval. Also, will you advise me when it has been forwarded.
Thank you. If you have any questions, please contact me at extension 2667.
~-
(){f/Ml-
?:T 3/b/O f
dod/LMW
C: Scott Johnson, Purchasing
16E4
CERTIFICATE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY
I, TRACI TONG, a duly elected and acting Assistant Secretary of Sprint
Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), do hereby
certify that I am a duly elected and acting Assistant Secretary of the
Corporation and have access to the corporate records and minutes of the
Corporation.
I further certify that Leon Frazier, a Vice President of the Corporation,
is authorized to enter into contracts on behalf of the Corporation pursuant to
the fiscal authorization policy applicable to the Corporation.
In witness to the foregoing, I have signed my name as Assistant
Secretary of Sprint Solutions, Inc. this 5th day of March, 2008, at 2001
Edmund Hailey Drive, Reston, Virginia.
~
---... --
~ /"----
r"'>
Traci Tong
Assistant Secretary
www.sunbiz.org - Department of State
Page I of2
16E4
Home
Contact Us
E.Filing Services
Document Searches
Forms
H
Previous on List Next on List Return To List
No Events No Name History Entity Name:
Detail by Entity Name
Foreign Profit Corporation
SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Filing Information
Document Number F02000004082
FEI Number 470882463
Date Filed 08/12/2002
State DE
Status ACTIVE
Principal Address
6500 SPRINT PARKWAY
OVERLAND PARK KS 66251
Changed 04/14/2004
Mailing Address
6500 SPRINT PARKWAY
HL-5ASTX
OVERLAND PARK KS 66251
Changed 04/14/2004
Registered Agent Name & Address
CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY
1201 HAYS STREET
TALLAHASSEE FL 32301-2525 US
Officer/Director Detail
Name & Address
TitleS/D
HILL, CHRISTIE A
2001 EDMUND HALLEY DRIVE
RESTON VA 20191
Title P
ANGELINO, MARK
2001 EDMUND HALLEY DR.
http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?action~D ETFJI ,&illlL doc _ number= F0200000408... 2/5/2008
www.sunbiz.org - Department of State
RESTON VA 20191
TitleT
LINDAHL. RICHARD
2001 EDMUND HALLEY DR
RESTON VA 20191
Title D
KENNEDY, LEONARD
2001 EDMUND HALLEY DR
RESTON VA 20191
TitleVP
BESHEARS, MARK V
6500 SPRINT PARKWAY
OVERLAND PARK KS 66251
Annual Reports
Report Year Filed Date
2005 01/26/2005
2006 04/25/2006
2007 04/30/2007
Document Images
04/30/2007 ,~ANNUAL REPORT
04/25/2006 -- ANNUAL REPORT
01/26/2005 -- ANNUAL REPORT
04/14/2004:co ANNUAL REPORT
02/13/2003 :- ANNUAL REPORT
08/12/2002 'co Foreign Profit
Page 2 of2
16[4
View image in PDF format
View image in PDF format
View image in PDF format
View image in PDF format
View image in PDF format
View image in PDF format
Note: This is not official record. See documents if question or conflict. I
E'LevioU!LaR!-i~1 Next an List
R~t!lmTQ!-i!;t
No Events
No Name History
Entity Name:
Home Contact us Document Searches E-Filing Services Forms Help
Copyright and Privacy Policies
Copyright @ 2007 State of Florida, Department of State.
http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?action~[) ETF1L&inq~ doc ~ numbcr~ F0200000408... 2/5/2008
A G R E E MEN T 08-5012
16[4
for
Cellular Communications Services & Equipment
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this 26th day of February, 2008, by and
between Sprint Solutions, Inc., authorized to do business in the State of Florida, whose
business address is 2001 Edmund Halley Drive, Reston, Virginia 20191, hereinafter called the
"Contractor" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Collier
County, Naples, hereinafter called the "County":
WIT N E SSE T H:
1. COMMENCEMENT.
The contract shall be for a two (2) year period, commencing on March 1, 2008, and
terminating on February 28, 2010. The County retains the right to renew this
Agreement, with the consent of the Contractor, under the same terms and conditions
for two (2) additional one-year periods.
The Purchasing/General Services Director or his designee may, at his discretion, extend
the Agreement under all of the terms and conditions in this Agreement for up to one
hundred eighty (180) days. Any subsequent extensions must be approved by the Board
of County Commissioners. The County shall give the Contractor written notice of the
County's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior to the
end of the Agreement term then in effect.
2. STATEMENT OF WORK. The Contractor shall provide cellular phones, equipment
and services in accordance with the terms and conditions the Contractor's proposal in
response to RFP #08-5012, Collier County's RFP #08-5012, and Exhibit A, Collier
County Operating Parameters, Exhibit B, Wireless Services Term and Volume Discount,
Exhibit C, Sprint Nextel Rate Plans, and Exhibit D, Wireless Services Product Terms and
Conditions, referred to herein and made an integral part of this agreement.
Due to technical and/or service and product changes, as new plan options and/or
services are offered by the Contractor, the County shall have the option of switching,
adding, and/or deleting products and/or services as required. Additional rate plans
and/or services will be identified in subsequent, sequential attachments to this
Agreement. Changes to any plans may be done at any time during this Agreement
without penalty.
This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties and any
modifications to this Agreement shall be mutually agreed upon in writing by the
Page 1 of 21
16E4
Contractor and the County Project Manager or his designee, in compliance with the
County Purchasing Policy and Administrative Procedures in effect at the time such
services are authorized.
Any County agency may purchase products and services under this Agreement,
provided sufficient funds are included in their budgets.
3. COMPENSATION. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this
Agreement the aggregate of the units actually ordered and furnished at the unit price,
together with the cost of any other charges/fees submitted in the proposal and Exhibit
C - Sprint Nextel Rate Plans.
Any and all Nextel iDEN accessories will be at a twenty percent (20%) discount off the
then current price sheet.
Payment will be made upon receipt of a proper invoice and upon approval by the
Project Manager or his designee, and in compliance with Section 218.70, Fla. Stats.,
otherwise known as the "Florida Prompt Payment Act".
Contractor's acceptance of late or partial payments is not a waiver of its right to collect
the full amount due.
Disputed Charges. If the County disputes a charge in good faith, the County may
withhold payment of that charge if the County makes timely payment of all undisputed
charges and, within thirty (30) days of the due date, provides Contractor with a written
explanation of the County's reasons for disputing the charge. The County must
cooperate with Contractor to promptly resolve any disputed charge. If Contractor
determines, in good faith, that the disputed charge is valid, Contractor will notify
Customer and Customer must pay the charge promptly or invoke the dispute
resolution process in this Agreement. If Contractor determines in good faith that the
disputed charge is invalid, Contractor will credit Customer for the invalid charge
4. NOTICES, All notices from the County to the Contractor shall be deemed duly served
if mailed or faxed to the Contractor at the following Address:
Sprint Solutions, Inc.
2001 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 20191
MS: VARESP0101-1076
Attention: Michaela Clairmonte
Manager, Contract Negotiations & Management
Telephone: (703) 433-8581
Facsimile: (703) 433-8798
Page 2 of 21
16E4
With A Copy To:
Sprint Solutions, Inc.
4914 South Tamiami Trail
Sarasota, FL 34231
Attention: Tim Yokum, Public Sector Account Manager
Telephone: 941-929-2108
Facsimile: 941-929-2101
All Notices from the Contractor to the County shall be deemed duly served if mailed or
faxed to the County to:
Collier County Government Center
Purchasing Department - Purchasing Building
3301 Tamiami Trail, East
Naples, Florida 34112
Attention: Scott Johnson, Purchasing Agent
Telephone: 239-252-8995
Facsimile: 239-252-6588
The Contractor and the County may change the above mailing address at any time
upon giving the other party written notification. All notices under this Agreement
must be in writing.
5. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating
a partnership between the County and the Contractor or to constitute the Contractor as
an agent of the County.
6. PERMITS: LICENSES: TAXES. In compliance with Section 218.80, F.S., all permits
necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be obtained by the Contractor. Payment
for all such permits issued by the County shall be processed internally by the County.
All non-County permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be procured
and paid for by the Contractor. In addition, the Contractor shall comply with all rules,
regulations and laws of Collier County, the State of Florida, or the U. S. Government
now in force or hereafter adopted. The Contractor agrees to comply with all laws
governing the responsibility of an employer with respect to persons employed by the
Contractor. Contractor will recognize and honor all validly and properly issued and
executed tax exemption certificates delivered by the County and statutory exemptions
and will not bill the County for any such exempted taxes. Contractor's rates and charges
for Products and Services, set forth in Contractor's response, do not include taxes. The
County will pay all applicable taxes for which it does not hold a valid tax exemption,
including, but not limited to, sales, use, gross receipts, excise, value-added, property,
transaction, or other local, state, or national taxes or charges imposed or based on the
provision, sale or use of Products and Services. Notwithstanding any other provision of
this Agreement, if a jurisdiction where the County conducts business requires the
Page 3 of 21
16E4
County to deduct or withhold separate taxes from any amount due to Contractor, the
County must notify the Contractor in writing. The Contractor will then increase the
gross amount of the County's invoice so that, after the County's deduction or
withholding for taxes, the net amount paid to the Contractor will not be less than the
amount the Contractor would have received without the required deduction or
withholding. The County is not responsible for payment of Contractor's direct income
and employment taxes.
7. NO IMPROPER USE. The Contractor will not use, nor suffer or permit any person to
use in any manner whatsoever, county facilities for any improper, immoral or offensive
purpose, or for any purpose in violation of any federal, state, county or municipal
ordinance, rule, order or regulation, or of any governmental rule or regulation now in
effect or hereafter enacted or adopted. In the event of such violation by the Contractor
or if the County or its authorized representative shall deem any conduct on the part of
the Contractor to be objectionable or improper, the County shall have the right to
suspend the contract of the Contractor. Should the Contractor fail to correct any such
violation, conduct, or practice to the satisfaction of the County within twenty-four (24)
hours after receiving notice of such violation, conduct, or practice, such suspension to
continue until the violation is cured. The Contractor further agrees not to commence
operation during the suspension period until the violation has been corrected to the
satisfaction of the County.
8. TERMINATION. Should either party be found to have failed to perform its services in
a manner satisfactory to the non-breaching party, as per this Agreement, following a
thirty-day period to cure, the non-breaching party may terminate said agreement for
cause; further the County may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a thirty
(30) day written notice.
9. NO DISCRIMINATION. The Contractor agrees that there shall be no discrimination as
to race, sex, color, creed or national origin.
10. INSURANCE, The Contractor shall provide insurance as follows:
A. Commercial General Liabilitv: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000
Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property
Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent
Contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability.
B. Business Auto Liabilitv: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $300,000 Per
Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property
Damage Liability. This shall include: Owned Vehicles, Hired and Non-Owned
Vehicles and Employee Non-Ownership.
C. Workers' Compensation: Insurance covering all employees meeting Statutory
Limits in compliance with the applicable state and federal laws.
Page 4 of 21
16E4
Special Requirements: Collier County shall be listed as the Certificate Holder and
included as an Additional Insured on the Comprehensive General Liability
Policy.
Current, valid insurance policies meeting the requirement herein identified shall
be maintained by Contractor during the duration of this Agreement. Renewal
certificates shall be sent to the County within fifteen (15) days of any expiration
date. There shall be a thirty (30) day notification to the County in the event of
cancellation of any stipulated insurance coverage.
Contractor shall insure that all subContractors comply with the same insurance
requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide
County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions.
11. INDEMNIFICATION. To the maximum extent permitted by law and subject to the
limitations set forth under Florida Statutes Section 768.28, the Contractor shall
indemnify and hold harmless Collier County, its officers and employees from any and
all third party claims for liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not limited
to, reasonable attorneys' fees and paralegals' fees arising directly from performance of
this Agreement and relating to personal injury, death, or damage to tangible personal
property that is alleged to have resulted in whole or in part, by the gross negligence,
recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Contractor or anyone employed
by the Contractor in the performance of this Agreement. This indenmification
obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or reduce any other rights or
remedies which otherwise may be available to an indemnified party or person described
in this paragraph.
This section does not pertain to any incident arIsmg from the sole negligence of
Collier County.
Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as a waiver of the limits of liability County
has by virtue of sovereign immunity in excess of what is afforded under law.
12. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of
the County by the Purchasing Department.
13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Contractor represents that it presently has no interest and
shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner
with the performance of services required hereunder. Contractor further represents
that no persons having any such interest shall be employed to perform those services.
14. COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS CONTRACT. This Contract consists of the attached
component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the contract as if herein set out
verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, Insurance Certificate, RFP #08-5012 Specifi-
cations/Scope of Services and Exhibits A, B, C and D.
Page5of21
16E4
15. SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION. It is further understood and agreed by and between
the parties herein that this agreement is subject to appropriation by the Board of County
Commissioners.
16. PROHIBITION OF GIFTS TO COUNTY EMPLOYEES. No organization or
individual shall offer or give, either directly or indirectly, any favor, gift, loan, fee,
service or other item of value to any County employee, as set forth in Chapter 112, Part
III, Florida Statutes, Collier County Ethics Ordinance No. 2004-05, and County
Administrative Procedure 5311. Violation of this provision may result in one or more of
the following consequences: a. Prohibition by the individual, firm, and/or any
employee of the firm from contact with County staff for a specified period of time; b.
Prohibition by the individual and/or firm from doing business with the County for a
specified period of time, including but not limited to: submitting bids, RFP, and/or
quotes; and, c. immediate termination of any contract held by the individual and/or
firm for cause.
17. IMMIGRATION LAW COMPLIANCE. By executing and entering into this
agreement, the Contractor is formally acknowledging without exception or stipulation
that it is fully responsible for complying with the provisions of the Immigration Reform
and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 U.s.e. 1324, et seq. and regulations relating
thereto, as either may be amended. Failure by the Contractor to comply with the laws
referenced herein shall constitute a breach of this agreement and the County shall have
the discretion to unilaterally terminate this agreement immediately.
18. VENUE. Any suit or action brought by either party to this Agreement against the other
party relating to or arising out of this Agreement must be brought in the appropriate
federal or state courts in Collier County, Florida, which courts have sole and exclusive
jurisdiction on all such matters.
19. OFFER EXTENDED TO OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. Collier County
encourages and agrees to the successful proposer extending the pricing, terms and
conditions of this solicitation or resultant contract to other governmental entities at the
discretion of the successful proposer.
20. AGREEMENT TERMS. If any portion of this Agreement is held to be void, invalid, or
otherwise unenforceable, in whole or in part, the remaining portion of this Agreement
shall remain in effect.
21. ADDITIONAL ITEMS/SERVICES. Additional items and/ or services may be added to
this contract upon satisfactory negotiation of price by the Contract Manager and
Contactor.
22. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Prior to the initiation of any action or proceeding permitted
by this Agreement to resolve disputes between the parties, the parties shall make a good
faith effort to resolve any such disputes by negotiation. The negotiation shall be
attended by representatives of Contractor with full decision-making authority and by
Page 6 of 21
16D4
the County's staff person who would make the presentation of any settlement reached
during negotiations to the County for approval. Failing resolution, and prior to the
commencement of depositions in any litigation between the parties arising out of this
Agreement, the parties shall attempt to resolve the dispute through Mediation before an
agreed-upon Circuit Court Mediator certified by the State of Florida. The mediation
shall be attended by representatives of the Contractor with full decision-making
authority and by the County's staff person who would make the presentation of any
settlement reached at mediation to the County's Board for approval. Should either
party fail to submit to mediation as required hereunder, the other party may obtain a
court order requiring mediation under section 44.102, Fla. Stat.
23. ASSIGNMENT, SUBLEASE, SALE, etc.: Should the contractor sell or sublet this
contract or any part thereof to any person or entity other than the awardee, the Board of
County Commissioners shall be notified in writing immediately upon the transfer of
ownership. The assignment of this contract or any part thereof, shall require that its
assignee be bound to it and to assume toward the contractor, all of the obligations and
responsibilities that contractor has assumed toward the County. In the County's best
interest, and at its option, the service/commodity may be re-bid, delivering a sixty (60)
day written notice to the new owner(s).
Page 7 of 21
16E4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the County, have each, respectively, by an
authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above
written.
ATTEST;::.
''',;., J.,.~; ),,, ,
Dw~g E:'Br.q~~..Clerk of Courts
, '., 0f1 ~ ,",D~.1\_
~ ""~'r~Lr~
Gated: 3<1i:"6~
Att.fSEAL)' "
;S, u.to.,.....~
slqna6i~~j~'''''''''' .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
.
SPRINT SOLUTIONS. INC.
Contractor
By:
iI;I~;5k",,-~
, Signatute"
H. Leon Frazier - Senior Vice President
Typed signature and title
Klc~w\ CU\I(2.f-.{oV'l'tlC-
tType/print witness namet
Sprint - Approved
as to Legal Form
HAF - 25 Feb 2008
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
~
Item # lloe+
Agenda ." _"7 L. 0
Dale ~ <<-<!--oe;
Print Name
~~
Deputy Clerk
Page 8 of 21
EXHIBIT A
16f4
Collier County Operating Parameters
Approved Equipment: The County will approve a total of three (3) units to use. They will
include one data phone (Blackberry), and two traditional voice only units (non-blackberry).
The County may, at its discretion, add units to the approved equipment list after successful
negotiation of price. The County reserves the right to purchase Client Access Licenses
(CALs) for the Blackberry Enterprise Server (BES) from any source.
All equipment shall be delivered to the Contract Manager.
Approved Rate Plans:
1. The County intends to use "pooled voice minutes" as the primary method of billing.
Sprint will make a recommendation of appropriate rate plan(s) for the pooled
packages. The rate shall be billed per phone per OAC. The County requires the
following features free of charge: Caller 10, Voice Mail, Call Waiting, Mobile to Mobile
calling for Sprint COMA subscribers, and free Nights & Weekend minutes between
7PM and 7 AM and on weekends.
2. The Unlimited BlackBerry Email and Web plan to be provided for all County
BlackBerry data devices shall include tethering at no cost as outlined in Sprint's
proposal.
3. The County requests that any services that result in a per item cost such as text
messaging, or any other such item, be blocked from use. Sprint can only block text
messaging on cellular units with voice only services.
4. The entire Sprint portfolio of products and services will be available for the County to
use under this Agreement, however, any changes to the discount structure will require
a letter of approval from the County's Contract Manager.
Number Portability: It is the responsibility of the Contractor to handle all portability issues
as they arise. Contractor will make a commercially reasonable effort to complete numbers
transferred through portability within seven (7) business days. Before a telephone number
previously used with another carrier can be used on a Sprint Network, the County must
provide information about the account with the other carrier (account name, account
number, address, and social security number or tax identification number) and purchase
Sprint Wireless Products from Contractor.
Master Billing Account: Collier County requests a new master billing account. Collier
County will not accept paper bills. Bills must be presented on line. The master billing
account shall include, Department Name, Cost Center information, User Name, Telephone
Number, Rate Plan(s), and the Approved Features.
Page 9 of 21
16[b.
Access to Master Account: The County's Contract Manager shall have full access to manage ·
the account via the internet or by phone. The access shall include, but not limited to, the
ability to move phones from the current billing DAC to another DAC, change Electronic
Serial Numbers (ESN), add or delete features, and/or suspend/reactivate equipment. Any
phone in changes to the Master Account must be approved in writing by the Contract
Manager in advance of the change occurring. The County's Contract Manager shall have the
ability to setup access for other users as needed.
Sprint will establish the new account and setup departmental access credentials to their DAC
only. That access shall be "view only".
Commencement of Invoicing. Contractor may begin invoicing the County in full for non-
recurring and recurring charges on the later of the date the Products or Services are installed
and made available or the first day of the first bill cycle after the Effective Date. The County's
first invoice may contain a pro-rata charge for the period of time from activation to the end of
the then-current billing cycle.
Delavs. In certain instances (e.g., Roaming charges), Contractor may bill the County in the
current invoice cycle for usage that occurred during a prior invoicing cycle, if not previously
invoiced to the County. When Contractor's invoices for usage incurred during a prior
invoicing cycle, those minutes count against minutes in the current invoicing cycle.
Demo Equipment:
The Contractor shall provide the County with a total of twenty-five (25) telephone units
("Loaner Devices") to be used as spares when there is a broken piece of equipment. The
Loaner Devices will be provided to the County Contract Manager in a non-active state for
distribution and activation on an as needed basis. The County will be responsible for the
airtime charges incurred on the Loaner Devices.
Bidirectional Amplifiers: The Contractor shall provide to the County bidirectional
amplifiers, and shall install such bidirectional amplifiers within ninety (90) days upon formal
request by the County Contract Manager. All requests will be made in writing. Requests for
extensions to the ninety (90) day window may be made in writing to the County. There shall
not be a limit to the amount of BOA's the County may request. Additional terms and
conditions will apply to bidirectional amplifier installations.
Access to support: Sprint shall provide the County's Contract Manager with direct access to
technical, billing, and sales support.
Transition Inventory List: Sprint shall provide the County Contract Manager with a
spreadsheet inventory of all phones detailing, Department Name, Department Cost Center,
User Name, Phone number, Model number, ESN number and DAC, at the conclusion of the
transition to the new account.
Page 10 of 21
EXHIBIT B
WIRELESS SERVICES TERM AND VOLUME DISCOUNT
16E4
1. GOVERNMENT DISCOUNT PROGRAM (uGDpU).
1.1 Effective Date of Discounts. For new "Active Units" (defined as a Product that Customer enrolls in a
Business Plan under the Agreement), the discounts below apply as of the Commencement Date. For Active
Units under pre-existing agreement(s) between Sprint and Customer, Sprint will apply the discounts no later
than 60 days after the Commencement Date.
1.2 Government Discount. The Government Discount, described in the table below, is a percentage discount off
the eligible monthly recurring charges ("MRCs") charged for Customer-Liable Active Units.
Network Government Service Individual-Liable Service
Pricing Discount Pricing Discount
Sprint National Network and Nextel 25% 15%
National Network
1.3 How Calculated. Service Pricing Discounts apply to eligible MRCs before taxes and surcharges and after
calculation of all other credits, discounts, and rebates. Overage, usage-based, and third party application and
service charges, as well as certain network-specific Products and Services, are not eligible for Service Pricing
Discounts. Service Pricing Discounts may apply to the MRC of certain promotional rate plans which Sprint may
offer on a limited time basis and subject to promotion-specific restrictions.
1.4 Eligibility. Only Active Units that are included in Customer's Sprint account hierarchy are eligible for the GDP,
It may take up to 2 invoicing cycles to move pre-existing Active Units to the same invoicing cycle in order to
start receiving the Government Discount. Customer's contractors, suppliers, and any non-government, non-
authorized agencies working with Customer are not eligible for the Government Discount.
2, EMPLOYEE DISCOUNT PROGRAM.
2.1 Eligible Employees. New and existing Customer Employee (or Individual-Liable) Active Units may receive the
Individual-Liable Service Pricing Discount in the table above. The Individual-Liable Service Pricing Discount is
contingent upon the Employee signing Sprint's consumer subscriber agreement and providing Sprint with
satisfactory evidence of employment with Customer. Customer and Sprint will agree on methods for
employment verification. Upon termination of this Agreement for any reason, or upon the Employee's
termination of employment with Customer, Sprint may cease applying the Individual.Liable Service Pricing
Discount Except for the Individual-Liable Service Pricing Discount, Individual.Liable Active Units are subject to
the terms and conditions in the consumer subscriber agreement.
2,2 Communications. Customer's employee benefits group and Sprint will develop a communications plan to
present discounts and to sell to Employees within 60 days of the Effective Date. Communications may include,
but are not limited to, new hire materials, benefits enrollment materials, e-mail, payroll stuffers, newsletters, or
Internet and intranet links.
3. WIRELESS DEVICE PURCHASE DISCOUNTS AND UPGRADE TERMS.
3.1 Wireless Device Purchase Discount. New Customer-Liable Active Units are eligible for a minimum 39%
discount off the "one year net price," defined as the suggested retail price less $75.00. The devices offered
with this discounted price may change at any time in Sprint's sole discretion. This discounted device offer may
not be available in all sales channels.
3.2 Upgrade Terms. Existing Customer-Liable Active Units may be upgraded or replaced after 12 months of
continuous service at the discounted device price identified in Section 3.1 above. Otherwise, the suggested
retail price will apply.
4. ACTIVATION FEES. Sprint will waive the nonrefundable activation fee of $36 for each Customer account hierarchy.
Activation fees for Individual-Liable Active Units are governed by Sprint's consumer subscriber agreement.
Page II of21
EXHIBIT C - SPRINT NEXTEL RATE PLANS
16 E 4.
NEXTEL NATIONAL NETWORK BUSINESS PLANS & POLICIES
1. PROVISION OF NEXTEL PRODUCTS AND SERVICES.
This Attachment A-1 applies only to Nextel Products and Services operating on the Nextel National Network.
Any of the following entities may provide the Nextel Services listed in the Agreement, depending on
Customer's billing address or the location where the Nextel Services are activated:
Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc. Nextel of New York, Inc. Nextel South Corp.
Nextel Partners of Upstate New York, Inc. Nextel of California, Inc. Nextel of Texas, Inc.
1.1
1.2
Nextel West Corp.
NPCR, Inc.
2. NEXTEL VOICE AND DATA RATE PLANS. Customer may select from the Nextel voice and data rate plans listed in
this Attachment or promotional rate plans which Sprint may offer on a limited time basis.
2.1 Business Essentials with 7 P.M. Plan.
Business Business Business Business Business Business
Essentials Essentials Essentials Essentials Essentials Essentials
400 1000 1400 2000 3000 4000
MRC $39.99 $59.99 $79.99 $99.99 $149.99 $199.99
Anvtime Minutes 400 1000 1400 2000 3000 4000
A~me Minutes Over~ $OAO/minute $OAO/minute $OAO/minute $OAO/minute $OAO/minute $OAO/minute
Local & Nationwide Walkie-Talkie Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited
Unlimited Nights & Weekends Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited
startinn at 7 n.m.
Shared Minutes Included Included Included Included Included Included
Nationwide Loon Distance Included Included Included Included Included Included
Roamina Not Available Not Available Not Available Nol Available Not Available Not Available
Caller 10 & Voice Mail Included Included Included Included Included Included
Note: TalkgroupSM, Group Walkie-Talkie and International Walkie-Talkie charges not included. Walkie-Talkie available on
Walkie-Talkie enabled devices only.
2.2 Free Incoming Plans.
Free Incoming Free Incoming Free Incoming Free Incoming
300 500 800 1000
MRC $49.99 $59.99 $79.99 $99.99
Anvtime Minutes 300 500 800 1,000
Anvtime Minutes Overane $OA5/minute $OA5/minute $OA5/minute $OA5/minute
Local & Nationwide Walkie-Talkie Uniimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited
Unlimited Ninhts & Weekends startinn at 9 nm Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited
Nationwide Lono Distance Included Included Included Included
Roaminn Not availabie Not available Not available Not available
Shared Minutes Not available Not available Not available Not available
Caller 10 & Voice Mail Included Included Included Included
Note: TalkgroupSM, Group Walkie-Talkie and International Walkie-Talkie charges not included. Walkie-Talkie available on
Walkie-Talkie enabled devices only.
2.3 Unlimited Mobile-to-Mobile Calling Add-On.
I Unlimited Mobile-to-Mobile
MRC . $5.00
Note 1: Mobile-ta-Mobile minutes may be between Nextel, Sprint pes, and Boost subscribers.
Note 2: Long distance charges apply to any plans that do not expressly include Nationwide Long Distance.
2.4 Unlimited Nights and Weekends Add-On.
Unlimited Nights and Weekends 7pm Unlimited Niahts and Weekends 5am
MRC $5.00 $10.00
Page 12 of 21
16E4
SPRINT PCS SERVICES BUSINESS PLANS & POLICIES
1. PROVISION OF SPRINT PCS PRODUCTS AND SERVICES. Sprint Spectrum LP. provides the Sprint PCS Products
and Services operating on the Sprint National Network listed in the Agreement. All terms and conditions in this
Attachment only refer to Sprint PCS Active Units operating on the Sprint National Network.
2. SPRINT PCS AFFILIATES. Pricing in this Attachment may not be available to Active Units activated in Sprint PCS
Affiliate Markets.
3. SPRINT PCS VOICE AND DATA PLANS FOR BUSINESS
3.1 Sprint Business Essentials~ With 7 P.M. Plan.
Business Business Business Business Business Business
Essentials Essentials Essentials Essentials Essentials Essentials
400 1000 1400 2000 3000 4000
MRC $39.99 $59.99 $79.99 $99.99 $149.99 $199.99
Anytime Minutes 400 1000 1400 2000 3000 4000
$OAO/minut $OAO/minut $OAO/minut $OAO/minut $OAO/minut $OAO/minute
Anvtime Minutes Overaoe e e e e e
Mobile to Mobile Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Uniimited Unlimited Unlimited
Uniimited Nights & Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited
Weekends starlina at 7 p.m.
Shared Minutes Included Included Included included Included Included
Nationwide Lana Distance Included Included Included Inciuded Included Included
Roamina Included Included Included Included Included Included
Caller ID & Voice Mail Included Included Included Included Included Included
3.2 Sprint Free Incoming Plan.
Sprint Free Sprint Free Sprint Free Sprint Free
Incoming Incoming Incoming Incoming
300 500 800 1000
MRC $49.99 $59.99 $79.99 $99.99
Anvtime Minutes 300 500 800 1000
Incomina Minutes Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited
Anvtime Minute Overaae $OA5/minute $OA5/minute $OA5/minute $OA5/minute
Unlimited Niahts & Weekends starlina at 9 nm Included Included Included Included
Nationwide Lana Distance Included Included Included Included
Domestic Voice Roamina Included Included Included Included
Domestic Voice Roaming Lang Distance Included Inciuded Included Included
Shared Minutes Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available
Caller ID & Voice Mail Included Included Included Included
3.3 Sprint Unlimited Mobile-to-Mobile Calling Add-On.
I Unlimited Mobile-to-Mobile
MRC $5.00
Note 1: Mobile-ta-Mobile minutes may be between Nextel, Sprint pes, and Boost subscribers.
Note 2: Long distance charges apply to any plans that do not expressly include Nationwide Long Distance.
3.4 Unlimited Nights and Weekends Add-On.
Unlimited Nights and Weekends - 7 om Unlimited Niahts and Weekends - 6 pm
MRC $5.00 $10.00
Page 13 of 21
16
r:lt.
L .
3.5 Sprint PCS Connection Card Plans.
MRC
$39.99
40MB
$0.001/KB
$99.99
$79.99
Unlimited
Not A Iicable
Not Applicable
$0.20 er minute
$0.20 er minute
Note: All pricing and available MBs are the same whether Active Units use the Sprint Mobile Broadband (EV-DO)
network or the Sprint pes Vision (1 xRTT) network. Sprint Mobile Broadband coverage is not available
everywhere and requires a Sprint Mobile Broadband-compatible connection card. Where the Sprint Mobile
Broadband network is available and a Sprint Mobile Broadband-compatible connection card is used, Active
Units will first attempt to connect to the Sprint Mobile Broadband network, then default to the Sprint pes
Vision network depending on coverage and network availability.
4. ELECTRONIC BilLING PRODUCTS.
4.1 The following electronic billing products are offered for customers desiring electronic invoice data. Each
electronic billing product provides Customer-Liabie Active Unit call detail record ("COR") information. Sprint
offers these products under the "Electronic Invoice Reporting and Analytics Product Annex" which is
available for review at www.sprint.com/ratesandconditions and can be attached to this Agreement at
Customer's request. The MRCs are as follows:
One-lime
ELECTRONIC BilliNG PRODUCTS Invoice Data SummarY Data MRC Set-up Fee
eBillinn & Analvsis 3 months 12 months $35.00 $200.00
Electronic Bill Transfer (EBT) 2 months N/A Not Annlicable Not Applicable
Electronic Data Interchanne IEDI\ 1 month N/A Not Applicable Not Aoolicable
4.2 Customer may choose 1 electronic billing product. or eBilling & Analysis and either EDI or EBT. Customer may
not choose the EDI and EBT products together. Upon 30 days prior written notice. Sprint reserves the right to
migrate Customer to an updated or successor version of the selected electronic billing product if available or
to an entirely new electronic billing product.
4.3 Customer will receive a summary invoice (without COR information) or a remittance invoice at no additional
charge. If Customer chooses to receive a detailed paper invoice along with an electronic billing product. the
following MRCs will apply.
Customer-liable Active Units MRC
5-500 $ 100.00
500+ $ 250.00
Page 14 of 21
16E4
EXHIBIT D
WIRELESS SERVICES PRODUCT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. APPLICABILITY. "Sprint Wireless Products and Services" refers generally to Nextel Products and Services provided
over the Nextel National Network (using iDEN technology) and Sprint PCS Products and Services provided over the
Sprint National Network (using COMA technology). Except where noted in this Annex or the Agreement, terms and
conditions of this Annex apply to Wireless Products and Services offered on both networks.
2. WIRELESS SERVICES CHARGES.
2.1 Monthly Recurring Charges ("MRC"). If Customer selects a Business Plan with included minutes, Sprint will
bill for voice Wireless Services based on the MRC, plus charge for voice usage beyond the included minutes
by multiplying the excess minutes by the applicable overcharge rate.
2.2 Usage Charges
A. General. Depending on the Business Plan selected, Customer may incur usage charges based on how,
when and where Customer uses the Services, including wireless voice calls, push-la-talk services such as
Sprint PCS Ready Link, Local Walkie-Talkie, Nationwide Walkie-Talkie, International Walkie-Talkie,
Group Walkie-Taikie, TalkgroupSM, Mobile Messaging, or Wireless Data Services.
B. Voice Call Services. Customer's call usage for voice calls (other than push-to-talk calls) is calcuiated
from the time Customer initiates contact with the Network until the Network connection is broken or
dropped, whether or not the actual connection to the intended recipient of the call or data transmission is
successful. Customer is responsible for incoming and outgoing call charges on calls that are answered.
Circuit-switched calls taking place on Wireless Data Services devices, including Sprint PCS Vision-
capable devices, that do not have voice plans associated with them will incur a per minute charge.
C. Wireless Data. For Active Units that are not on an unlimited data usage Plan, data usage is calculated on
a per kilobyte basis without regard to airtime used. Data usage is rounded up to the next whole kilobyte
(on the Sprint PCS Vision and Power Vision systems) or nearest one-tenth of a kilobyte (on the Nextel
National Network) and kilobyte usage charges are rounded up to the next full cent. Rounding up occurs at
the end of each separate session or each clock hour (at the top of each hour), if the session spans more
than 1 clock hour. Customer's invoice will not separately identify the number of kilobytes attributable to
Customer's use of specific sites, sessions or services used. When traveling on the Network, a data
session may end when moving between coverage areas and a new data session initiated, although no
interruption to the actual data session will occur. Customer may be charged for data exchanges initiated
by other Internet users as well as those Customer initiates. Estimates of data usage, for example, the size
of downloadable files, wili vary from actual use. Customer will be charged for additional data used in
transporting and routing on the Network and for partial or interrupted data downloads and re-sent data, as
well as unsuccessful attempts to reach Web sites and use other applications and services, including
those resulting from dropped network connections.
D. Long Distance/Special Services. Customer may incur long distance charges (including international
calling) or other charges for calls to 800, 866, 877, 888 and other toll-free numbers on Business Plans
that do not include long distance. Customer may also incur charges for special Services such as 411,
operator-assisted calls or call-forwarding. Push-to-talk connections do not incur long distance charges.
E. Push-to-Talk Services.
(1) Airtime Charges. Airtime charges apply to connections using a push-to-talk service for the entire
period of time the transmission is connected to the Network.
(2) Calculation of Airtime Charges. Customer will be charged a 6 second minimum for all push-to-talk
transmissions on the Nextel National Network and a 1 minute minimum for all push-to-talk
transmissions on the Sprint National Network. A push-to-talk transmission begins approximately
when Customer presses the button to initiate a transmission and ends approximately 6 seconds after
completion of a communication (Le., when Customer or another participant releases the button) to
which no participant responds. Customer initiates a new transmission if Customer responds more
than 6 seconds after another participant completes a communication. Airtime charges for push-to-talk
calls are charged to the party that initiates the transmission and, unless a rate plan includes unlimited
transmissions or access, are calculated by multiplying the duration of the transmission (including the
6 second period referred to above) by the applicable rate and the number of participants. After 6
seconds, ~ush-to-talk airtime is rounded up to the next second. Nationwide, international,
TalkgroupS ,and Group Walkie-Talkie calls use the Local Walkie-Talkie minutes in Customer's plan
and may incur additional access and overage charges. Sprint does not charge for sending or
receiving call alert transmissions ("Call Alerts"), but Customer will initiate a new push-to-talk call if
Customer responds to a Call Alert, even if responding within 6 seconds of receiving the alert.
Page 15 of 21
16E4
F. Text and Numeric Messaging, Text and numeric messaging are charged on a per message basis
unless Customer has purchased a block of messages at a fixed monthly price. With block pricing, Sprint
will charge at the per message rate for each message that exceeds Customer's selected block.
2.3 Other Charges.
A. Reactivation Fee. If Sprint temporarily or permanently terminates the Service, Sprint may charge a
reactivation charge per account, in addition to any outstanding account balance, before Sprint reactivates
Services.
B. Roaming Charges. Calls made while off the applicable Network may, depending on Customer's Business
Plan, incur separate Roaming charges. Domestic Roaming rates are set out in the Customer's pricing
attachment. International Roaming rates will vary. For current International Roaming rates, Customer can
access http://www.sorint.com or contact their Sprint Account Representative. There may be delays in
invoicing Roaming charges due to the practices of the roaming service provider.
C, Upgrade Charges. If an Active Unit changes devices using Sprint Wireless Products and Services during
the Term, Sprint may charge an upgrade charge per Active Unit changed. A change in device or Business
Plan that does not involve a move between the Nextel National Network and the Sprint National Network
is not considered a termination of service.
3. CREDITS FOR REDIALED CALLS. Sprint will provide Customer with an airtime credit of 1 minute for a call on a
Customer-Liable Active Unit that is: (a) placed while in an area covered by a Sprint Network, (b) disconnected, and, (c)
redialed within one (1) minute of disconnection. Customer must contact Sprint Wireless Customer Solutions within 24
hours of the disconnection and request credit for the call through the interactive voice response unit. If the interactive
voice response unit is not available, Customer may call Sprint Wireless Customer Solutions to speak directly with a
representative.
4. WIRELESS SERVICE OPTIONS.
4.1 Push-To-Talk Voice Services.
A. "Push-to-talk Services" refers generally to both Sprint PCS Ready Link on the Sprint National Network and
Local Walkie-Talkie, Nationwide Walkie-Talkie, International Walkie-Talkie, Group Walkie-Talkie, and
Talkgroup on the Nextel National Network. Push-to-talk Services require push-to-talk enabled phones on
both the originating and receiving ends of the call. Push-to-talk calls may not work simultaneously with a
voice call or with all types of Wireless Data transmissions from the same push-to-talk phone.
B, "Walkie-Talkie Calling" means calls from one Walkie-Talkie enabled Active Unit on the Nextel National
Network to another Walkie-Talkie enabled Active Unit on the same network. All Walkie-Talkie enabled
wireless devices support Local Walkie-Talkie. Select Walkie-Talkie enabled devices support Nationwide,
International, and Group Walkie-Talkie and TalkgroupsM calls. The number of Walkie-Talkie minutes
included and the applicable overage rates vary by Business Plan. Walkie-Talkie options are available as
an add-on for an additional charge if not already included in Customer's selected Business Plan. To use
Walkie-Talkie or TalkgroupsM features, Customer must have a Business Plan that supports Local Walkie-
Talkie minutes. Nationwide, International, TalkgroupSM, and Group Walkie-Talkie minutes of use are
deducted from the Local Walkie-Talkie minutes when included in Customer's Business Plan unless
Customer's Business Plan includes no Local Walkie-Talkie minutes or unlimited Walkie-Talkie minutes.
For current Local Walkie-Talkie calling areas or international coverage areas, Customers can contact their
Sprint Account Representatives or visit www.sprint.com. Certain restrictions apply to Walkie-Talkie and
Talkgroup features and can be found at www.sprinl.com.
4.2 Sprint Free Incoming Minute Plans. Sprint Free Incoming Minute Plans apply only to calls received in the
United States. Incoming call minutes are not free while Roaming, unless covered under a Roaming option
selected by Customer.
4,3 Sprint Mobile-To-Mobile Calling Option, "Sprint Mobile-to-Mobile Calling" means calls from one Active Unit
on either the Sprint National Network or the Nextel National Network to another Active Unit on either Network.
With this option, Customer may use an unlimited number of minutes each month to make or receive calls on
both Sprint Networks between Sprint PCS and Nextel phones, except for Nextel phones in some affiliate and
partner markets. Sprint Mobile-to-Mobile calls made from or received on an Active Unit that is on a Sprint
Network will use the Sprint Mobile-to-Mobile calling minutes and will not use Anytime Minutes. Sprint Mobile-
to-Mobile calling is not available while Roaming. Sprint Mobile-to-Mobile calls made from or received on a
Sprint PCS Product that is off the Network or in a non-participating affiliate or partner territory will be treated as
Roaming and Roaming charges may apply depending on the applicable Business Plan. Sprint Mobile-to-
Mobile Calling is not available for calls made to check voicemail, obtain directory assistance, or through other
indirect calling methods. If one user has a plan with Sprint Mobile-to-Mobile calling and the other does not, the
user with the Sprint Mobile-to-Mobile Calling will use this feature, while the other user's use is subject to the
terms of that user's Business Plan.
Page 16 of 21
16t4
4.4 PowerSource Phones. Service features and plans vary per PowerSource Phone and may not be available in
all markets. Active Units upgrading to a PowerSource Phone may experience changes in service availability,
pooling eligibility and billing. Nextel Walkie-Talkie service is only available in coverage areas of the Nextel
National Network (using iDEN technology). Voice and data service is only available in coverage areas of the
Sprint National Network (using CDMA technology).
4.5 Voice Command. The Voice Command option, which allows users to dial calls using verbal commands, is not
available while roaming off the Sprint National Network. Calls to 911 or similar emergency numbers cannot be
placed through Voice Command, but Customer may still call 911 through manual dialing. Airtime and
applicable long distance charges begin when the TALK or similar key is pressed.
4.6 Insurance. Customer may purchase insurance to protect against loss, theft, or damage involving Customer's
Wireless Products. Coverage may not be available for all Products and may involve a per claim deductible.
Enhanced warranty coverage is available on some Products. Insurance is provided by third party insurers and
not by Sprint If Customer selects coverage, Sprint will charge Customer a monthly premium per covered
Product and Sprint will remit the premiums to the third party insurer on Customer's behalf. Claims must be
submitted directly to the third party insurer. Terms of insurance coverage are available at the point of sale or in
subsequent communications.
4.7 Shared Minutes I Pooling. Customer must have a minimum of 3 Customer-Liable Active Units sharing to be
eligible for the Shared Minutes option. All Customer-Liable Active Units using this option must subscribe to an
eligible voice Business Plan. After all Anytime Minutes in the pooled Business Plans are exhausted, each
Customer-Liable Active Unit's additional airtime minutes are billed at the overage rate defined in the
associated Business Plan. Shared Minutes only allows pooling of Anytime Minutes, and is not available for
data Business Plans. Shared Minutes are not available with all voice Business Plans. See your Sprint account
representative or www.sorint.com for a full listing of eligible Business Plans.
4.8 Add-A-Phone. Add-A.Phone allows Customers to add Active Units to a voice Business Plan. With this option,
Customers using CDMA technology may add Active Units to the Sprint National Network and Customers using
iDEN technology may add Active Units to the Nextel National Network. Customers must have a minimum of 1
Active Unit with a Business Plan that includes Anytime Minutes to qualify for this option. Sprint may limit the
number of Active Units a Customer adds to its voice Business Plan with this option. Certain features, such as
Sprint Mobile-to-Mobile Calling, may not be included based on the voice Business Plan that Customer selects.
The Add-A-Phone option is not available with all voice Business Plans. Contact your Sprint Account
Representative for eligible Business Plans.
4.9 Roaming Option. Active Units with Business Plans that include Domestic Roaming, may use up to 50% of
their monthly usage (or allotted roaming minutes in certain markets) for Domestic Roaming. If Domestic
Roaming exceeds this threshold, Sprint may terminate the Wireless Service to the Active Unit, transfer the
Active Unit to another Business Plan, or charge the Active Unit at the applicable Roaming rate for the overage.
Roaming minutes may not be shared and are not avaiiable with single-band or digital mode only Active Units.
5. WIRELESS DATA SERVICES.
5.1 Wireless Data Services Defined. Wireless Data Services include applications such as emaii, data,
information and other wireless Internet services (the "Applications"). Use of Wireless Data Services is subject
to any storage, memory or other Product limitation.
5.2 Mobile Broadband I EV-DO. "Mobile Broadband" means wireless high-speed data solutions and Services
provided over the Sprint Power Vision Network (using CDMA technology) in certain coverage areas. To use
this option, Customer must have a Mobile Broadband compatible wireless device and subscribe to a Mobile
Broadband data plan. Access to the Sprint Power Vision Network from a personal computer requires
installation of the Sprint Connection Manager software or Mac OS update for Macintosh. Mobile broadband
rates may vary depending on the coverage area. Coverage is not available in all areas. Customer may learn
more about current coverage at <www.sprintcom/business/products/products/evdoEnterZip.jsp>.
5.3 Compatibility of Third Party Products or Applications. Certain Applications offered by Sprint or authorized
third parties may be compatible with certain Products and Services. Sprint does not guarantee compatibility of
third party Products or Applications with any Sprint Wireless Products or Services. Compatibility or notice from
Sprint of compatibility should not be construed as an endorsement of a third party Product or Application or a
commitment by Sprint that the Product or Application will continue to be compatible with Sprint Products or
Services. Unless otherwise stated in this Agreement, Sprint may, in its sole discretion, disable or discontinue
any third party Product or Application for any reason at any time.
5.4 Use of Wireless Data Services. Sprint Wireless Data Services may be used with mobile clients for
InterneVintranet access and Internet email via a standard HTML browser. Wireless Data Services may also be
used with software for proxy applications, for dispatch applications, for POP3 email access, and for other uses
specifically approved by Sprint Sprint may limit or suspend any heavy, continuous data usage that is
adversely affecting Sprint's network performance or hindering access to the Network. For devices that allow
multiple users to share one connection and subscription, the wireless performance may degrade as more
Page 17 01"21
16tE4.
users are added to the single wireless data device. Network speeds, including but not limited to data deiivery
and latency rates, are estimates based on averages. Actual performance may vary and no minimum speed is
guaranteed. Customer may not receive incoming voice calls or Push-to-talk Services (including Sprint
Business Connection) while using Sprint Wireless Data Services, such as Sprint PCS Vision. Sprint Wireless
Data Services may not be available when Roaming and are not currently available in certain portions of select
market areas within the Sprint Networks. Customer acknowledges that use of certain Sprint Wireless Data
Services, including some messaging services, can result in the disclosure to third parties of the user's email
address and other information in connection with the user's Internet usage. As a result, Customer may receive
advertising, warnings, alerts and other messages, including broadcast messages.
5.5 Premium Services. Access to and downloading of Premium Services is not included in the pricing in this
Agreement. Even if Customer's Business Plan includes "unlimited" kilobytes of data, Customer must still pay
all charges associated with access or use of Premium Services. Charges for Premium Services will be
specified at the time of access or available at www.sprint.com. Data usage charges also apply to and are
separate from charges for Premium Services. Certain Active Units may be blocked from or otherwise unable to
use Premium Services provided by third-party content providers. In certain instances, subject to the terms of
the content purchased, Sprint may delete Premium and non-Premium items downloaded to storage areas
controlled by Sprint, including any pictures, games and other content. Pictures downloaded to any Sprint-
maintained storage area may be deleted after 30 days. Sprint may impose a dollar or other limit on Customer's
use of Premium Services in a specific timeframe (month, week, day, or other time period) based on
Customer's credit.
6. SERVICE USAGE POLICIES.
6.1 Telephone Numbers And Portability. Sprint may change the telephone numbers assigned to each
Customer~Liable Active Unit with reasonable prior notice for commercial reasons, such as fraud prevention,
regulatory requirements, and area code changes. Customers do not have any right of possession or title to
any number, e-mail address or other identifier Sprint may assign to Customer's Wireless Products or
accounts. Customer may not modify, change or transfer any of these identifiers except as Sprint allows or as
allowed for by law. Sprint will comply with any FCC-issued regulations that require Sprint to allow Customer to
retain its assigned telephone numbers upon switching wireless service to another carrier. Before a telephone
number previously used with another carrier can be used on a Sprint Network, Customer must provide
information about the account with the other carrier (account name, account number, address, and social
security number or tax identification number) and purchase Sprint Wireless Products from Sprint. Until the port
from the previous carrier is successful, the Sprint Wireless Product will only be able to call 911 and Sprint
Customer Care. Once the port is completed, Customer's old device will no longer work. However, due to
system limitations and issues outside Sprint's control, some requests to port a telephone number from
another carrier to Sprint, or from Sprint to another carrier, may not be successful. If a transfer to Sprint
is not successful, Customer may return any Sprint Wireless Products within the return period to receive a
credit, and Customer will lose or repay Sprint for any discounts or service credits provided with a returned
Sprint Wireless Product or cancelled Service. Customer is responsible for all charges incurred up to the date
the transfer is completed.
6.2 Lost or Stolen Wireless Product Policy. If Customer's Product is lost or stolen, Customer must promptly
notify Sprint Customer Service to deactivate the Product. Customer is responsible for all service charges
associated with the Product before Customer notifies Sprint of the loss or theft. Sprint may require that
Customer provide evidence of the loss or theft (e.g., a police report or affidavit). If the Product is later found,
Sprint may require Customer to exchange the Product for another Product before reactivating Service and, in
such cases, Sprint will provide a replacement Product of similar quality at Sprint's expense.
6.3 Fraud Policy. Customer will immediately notify Sprint's Customer Care department of any suspected
fraudulent use of Products or Services. Customer will cooperate with Sprint in the investigation of the incident.
Sprint will attempt to contact Customer before interrupting Services in the case of suspected fraud.
7. SERVICE LIMITATIONS.
7.1 TTY Access. TTY-capable Sprint Wireless Products (also known as TOO or Text Telephone) may not function
effectively when attempting 911 calls due to the iimitations of the answering agency. A TTY device should not
be relied on for 911 Calls.
7.2 Pay-Per-Call Services. Sprint will not complete calls from any Product to 900, 976 and similar numbers for
pay-per-call services.
7.3 International Call Blocking. International calling capability will be blocked if not expressly requested by
Customer for an Active Unit.
7.4 Caller 10. Caller identification information may not be available for all incoming calls.
7.5 Product Compatibility.
Page ]80f2]
16E4
A. General. Sprint Wireless Products may not be compatible with services provided by other wireless
carriers, except for services provided over Sprint Affiliate networks or in connection with roaming
agreements. Currently, Sprint PCS Products relying on CDMA technology do not operate on the Nextel
National Network, which uses iDEN technology, and Nextel Products using iDEN technology do not
currently operate on the Sprint National Network.
B. PowerSource Phone. A "PowerSource Phone" is a device which provides both wireless voice and data
Services over the Sprint National Network, Sprint Affiliate networks, and other networks in connection with
roaming agreements (using CDMA technology) and Nextel Walkie-Talkie Services over the Nextel
National Network (using iDEN technology). PowerSource Phones cannot be used for simultaneous
Walkie-Talkie and wireless voice and data sessions.
7.6 911 Or Other Emergency Calls. For 911 calls, an emergency responder's ability to locate Customer through
Sprint Wireless Products and Services may be affected by various factors, including but not limited to the type
of Product used, lack of a GPS-enabled device, geography or other factors such as the porting process. Sprint
is not liable for failures or delays in connecting to the appropriate emergency services provider. In certain
circumstances, a 911 call may be routed to a state patrol dispatcher. Enhanced 911 ("E911") service that is
compatible with the FCC technical requirements is not available in all areas. Customer consents to Sprint's
disclosure of Customer information to governmental and public safety authorities in response to emergencies.
This information may include, but is not limited to, Customer's name, address, number, and the location of the
user of the Service at the time of call.
7.7 Service Affecting Conditions. Sprint is not liable for (a) coverage and service quality problems caused by
atmospheric, geographic, or topographic conditions or other conditions beyond Sprint's control including the
failure of other service providers; (b) interruption and unavailability of Sprint Wireless Services due to
coverage, capacity, product failure or other limitations may occur in the transmission or attempted
transmission of wireless services: or (c) outages or service disruptions occurring as a result of a public safety
emergency.
8. Rate Adjustments. Sprint may impose fees, charges or surcharges on Customer to recover amounts that Sprint is
required or permitted by governmental or quasi-governmental authorities to collect on their behalf, or to pay to others in
support of statutory or regulatory programs, plus a commercially reasonable amount to recover the administrative costs
associated with such charges or programs. These charges include, but are not limited to, state and federal Carrier
Universal Service Charges, Compensation to Payphone Providers, E911, Telephone Relay Service, Wireless Number
Pooling, and Wireless Local Number Portability. Cost recovery charges are not taxes or government required charges.
Sprint may impose additional charges or surcharges to recover amounts Sprint is charged for terminating or originating
a call to other wireless carriers such as international mobile termination charges.
9. WARRANTIES. EXCEPT AS, AND THEN ONLY TO THE EXTENT, EXPRESSLY PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT
OR THE APPLICABLE SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT, PRODUCTS AND SERVICES ARE PROVIDED "AS IS."
SPRINT DISCLAIMS ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES AND IN PARTICULAR DISCLAIMS ALL
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, AND
WARRANTIES RELATED TO EQUIPMENT, MATERIAL, SERVICES, OR SOFTWARE.
10. EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE.
10.1 Products. Sprint does not manufacture Products and, except as provided in this Agreement, is not
responsible for any defects in the Products or for the acts or omissions of the original equipment
manufacturer.
10.2 Software Provided by Sprint.
A. General Licensing Terms and Conditions. Where software is provided with a Product or Service,
Customer is granted a non~exclusive and non-transferable license or sublicense to use the software,
including any related documentation, solely to enable Customer to use the Products and Services in
accordance with the applicable licensing requirements. Software license terms and conditions of Sprint's
software vendors are provided through click and use screens, shrink-wrap notices, physical copies
delivered at the time of Product or Service installation, or copies posted on the Rates and Conditions
Website. Sprint may suspend, block or terminate Customer's use of any software if Customer fails to
comply with any applicable licensing requirement.
B. Prohibitions. Customer is not granted any right to use software on behalf of third parties or for time share
or service bureau activities, or to use or obtain any source code. Customer may not reverse engineer,
decompile, modify, enhance, or copy Sprint-provided software.
C. Ownership. Sprint or its suppliers retain title and property rights to all software. Upon termination or
expiration of the A9reement or the applicable Service, the related software license will terminate and
Customer will return all copies of software to Sprint or provide certification that it has permanently deleted
all Sprint-provided software from Customer-owned Equipment.
Page 190f21
16E4
10.3 Responsibilities. Customer is responsible for any Customer or third party equipment located at the
Customer's premises that impair Product or Service quality. Upon notice from Sprint of an impairment to the
Products or Services, Customer will promptly cure the problem. Customer will continue to pay Sprint for
Products and Services during such impairment or related suspension. If the impairment interferes with the use
of the Sprint Networks by Sprint or third parties, Sprint, in its reasonable discretion, may suspend or
disconnect the affected Products and Services without advance notice to Customer, although Sprint will
provide advance notice where reasonably practical. At Customer's request, Sprint will work with the Customer
to troubleshoot the source of the impairment at Sprint's then-current time and materials rates. Sprint is not
liable if a commercially reasonable change in Sprint Products or Services causes equipment or software used
by Customer to become obsolete, require alteration, or perform at lower levels.
11. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY.
11.1 Direct Damages. Each party's maximum liability for damages caused by its failure to perform its obligations
under this Agreement (other than service disruption) is limited to: (A) proven direct damages for claims arising
out of personai injury or death, or damage to real or tangible personal property, caused by the party's
negligent or willful misconduct; or (B) proven direct damages for all other claims arising out of this Agreement,
excluding service disruptions, not to exceed in the aggregate, in any 12 month period, an amount equal to
Customer's total net payments for the affected Products and Services purchased in the 6 months prior to the
event giving rise to the claim. Customer's payment obligations and Sprint's indemnification obligations under
this Agreement are excluded from this provision.
11.2 Consequential Damages. NEITHER PARTY Will BE LIABLE FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL,
OR INDIRECT DAMAGES FOR ANY CAUSE OF ACTION, WHETHER IN CONTRACT OR TORT.
CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, AND INDIRECT DAMAGES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, LOST
PROFITS, LOST REVENUES, AND LOSS OF BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY, WHETHER OR NOT THE OTHER
PARTY WAS AWARE OR SHOULD HAVE BEEN AWARE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF THESE DAMAGES.
11.3 Service Disruption. Sprint's sole liability arising from or related to Service disruption, regardless of the cause,
is limited to a credit allowance equal to the proportionate charge to Customer for the period of the Service
disruption. Service disruptions do not include unavailability of the Service during periods of scheduled or
unscheduled network maintenance.
11.4 Unauthorized Access I Hacking. Sprint is not liable for unauthorized third party access to, or alteration, theft,
or destruction of, Customer's data, programs or other information through accident, wrongful means or any
other cause while such information is stored on or transmitted across the Sprint Networks.
11.5 Transmission Over Sprint Network. Sprint is not liable for any third-party content accessed through
Products and Services, including but not limited to Premium Services. Sprint is not responsible for any loss,
liability, damage, or expense, including attorney's fees, resulting from any third party claims alleged to arise in
any way from information, data, or messages transmitted over the Sprint Networks by Customer, or by
Customer's own customers or agents, including but not limited to claims for or based on: (A) libel, slander,
invasion of privacy, infringement of copyright, and invasion or alteration of private records or data; (B)
infringement of patents arising from the use of equipment, hardware or software not provided by Sprint; and
(C) transmission and uploading of information that contains viruses, worms, or other destructive media or
other unlawful content.
12. FORCE MAJEURE. Neither party will be responsible for any delay, interruption or other failure to perform under this
Agreement due to acts or events beyond the reasonable control of the otherwise responsible party. Force majeure
events include, but are not limited to: natural disasters (e.g. lightning, earthquakes, hurricanes, floods); wars, riots,
terrorist activities, and civil commotions; inability to obtain parts or equipment from third party suppliers, cable cuts by
third parties, a local exchange carrier's activities, and other acts of third parties; explosions and fires; embargoes,
strikes, and labor disputes; and governmental decrees.
13. DEFINITIONS
13.1 "Active Unit" or "Line" is an active piece of wireless Product that Customer enrolls in a Business Plan under
the Agreement.
13.2 "Anytime Minutes" are the Network minutes of use that are available in a Business Plan that may be used at
anytime other than during Nights and Weekends.
13.3 "Business Plans" are Sprint PCS and Nextel Wireless service plans for business customers on which an
Active Unit is activated. Certain Business Plan options are priced in this Agreement or Customer may select
from any other available Business Plans, subject to the terms and pricing of that Plan.
13.4 "Commencement Date" is the first day of the first bill cycle in which Sprint bills monthly recurring charges or
usage charges.
13.5 "Customer-Liable Active Unit" or "Customer Line" each refer to an Active Unit activated by Customer for
its end use and for which Customer is financially liable.
Page 20 of 21
16[4
13.6 "Domestic Roaming" means Roaming on networks within the United States, Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin
Islands where Sprint has a roaming relationship with the carrier. "Domestic Roaming Long Distance"
means toll calls placed while in Domestic Roaming areas.
13.7 "Employee" means a person in the service of Customer and from whom Customer withholds FICA (Federal
Insurance Contributions Act) contributions from gross pay.
13.8 "Individual-Liable Account" means the Individual-Liable Sprint Wireless Services account in the name of,
and billed directly to, an Employee. "Individual-Liable Active Unit" or "Employee Line" is an Active Unit
activated by an Employee and for which the Employee is financially responsible.
13.9 "Net MRC" means the net monthly recurring charge before taxes and other charges and after calculation of all
other discounts, rebates, service credits or any such similar credits (not including Customer's applicable
volume discount).
13.10 "Nextel National Network" means the Sprint-owned or controlled iDEN wireless network, including network
owned or controlled by Nextel affiliates or partners, used by Sprint to provide Nextel Services.
13.11 "Nextel Services" means wireless services provided on the Nextel National Network by Sprint and authorized
Nextel affiliates and partners.
13.12 "Nights and Weekends" means Monday through Thursday 9:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. and Friday 9:00 p.m. to
Monday 7:00 a.m., unless either the Night and Weekends at 6pm option or Nights and Weekends at 7pm
option is selected. "Night and Weekends at 6pm" means Monday through Thursday 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
and Friday 6:00 p.m. to Monday 7:00 a.m. "Night and Weekends at 7pm" means Monday through Thursday
7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. and Friday 7:00 p.m. to Monday 7:00 a.m. The time used to determine Nights and
Weekends eligibility is the local time where the Product is located when an inbound or outbound call originates
13.13 llPremium Services" means downloads and applications, such as games, ringers and screen savers,
available through Sprint Wireless Data Services that are above and beyond basic data usage.
13.14 "Roaming" means voice or data service provided on another wireless carrier's network through agreements
established by Sprint.
13.15 "Sprint PCS Affiliate" means independent third parties that by contract offer Sprint PCS Products and
Services under the Sprint Marks. "Sprint PCS Affiliate Market" means the regions of the United States
covered by Sprint PCS Affiliates.
13.16 "Sprint PCS Services" means wireless services provided on the Sprint National Network using COMA
technology by Sprint and authorized Sprint PCS Affiliates.
13.17 "Sprint National Network" means the Sprint-owned or controlled COMA wireless network, including network
owned or controlled by Sprint PCS Affiliates, used by Sprint to provide Sprint PCS Services.
Page 21 of 21
16E4
A CORO,. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I DATE (MMIDDIYYYY)
4/1/2008 2/28/2008
PRODUCER Locktan Companies, LLC-I Kansas City THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
444 W. 47th Street, Suite 900 ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
Kansas City MO 64112-1906 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
(816) 960.9000
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC#
INSURED SPRINT CORPORA TION/ INSURER A: CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO. (A XV)
14971 SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INe. INSURER B: AMERICAN CASUAL TV CO.ofReading,PA
6480 SPRINT P ARKW A Y INSURER c: TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE CO.(A XV)
OVERLAND PARK KS 66251 GREAT AMERlCAN ASSURANCE CO.
INSURER 0:
, INSURER E:
nlls CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING
COVERAGES SPReaD 1 DE INSURER(5), AUTHORIZED REf'RESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR ~,~D' POLICY NUMBER Pa>1+~~~~~6gmf Pg~!fJ'I~~~~N LIMITS
LTR NSR TYPE OF INSURANCE
GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 2 000 000
A 'x COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY GL 20 7959 3819 4/1/2005 4/1/2008 ~~~~~~I9E~~~~~~ncei $ XXXXXXX
f- tJ CLAIMS MADE 0 OCCUR XXXXXXX
MED EXP (Anyone person) $
'x CONTRACTUAL PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 2.000.000
'x *TENANTS LEGAL LIAB GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 10,000,000
f- 3,000.000
GEN'l AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $
~ nPRO nlOC
X POllCY JECT
~TOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 2.000.000
A ~ ANY AUTO BVA 20 7959 3836 4/1/2005 4/1/2008 (Eaaccident)
- All OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY
(Per person) $ XXXXXXX
- SCHEDULED AUTOS
- HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY
(Per accident) $ XXXXXXX
- NON-OWNED AUTOS
- PROPERTY DAMAGE $ XXXXXXX
(Per accident}
~RAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ XXXXXXX
ANY AUTO NOT APPLICABLE OTHER THAN EAACC $ XXXXXXX
AUTO ONLY: AGG $ XXXXXXX
EXCESS/UMBRELLA LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 10.000000
D ~ OCCUR D CLAIMS MADE UMB5655283 4/1/2007 4/1/2008 AGGREGATE $ 10000000
$ XXXXXXX
=1 DEDUCTIBLE o UMBRELLA $ XXXXXXX
FORM
RETENTION $ $ XXXXXXX
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND WC 20 7959 3786 (AOS) 4/1/2005 4/l/2008 X I we STATU. I 10TH.
B TORY LIMITS ER
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
C ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE WC 20 7959 3772 (AZ.OR, WI) 4/1/2005 4/1/2008 E.L EACH ACCIDENT $ J ,000.000
B OFFICERiMEMBER EXCLUDED? WC 20 7959 3805 (CA) 4/1/2005 . 4/1/2008 EL DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000
B If yes, describe under NO K/A IN MONOPOLISTIC STATE
SPECIAL PROVISIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ ],000,000
OTHER
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS {'lOCATIONS I VEHICLES I EXCL.USIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT f SPECIAL PROVISIONS
*FlRE DAMAGE IS INCLUDED IN BROADER TENANT'S LEGAL LIABILITY FORM WITH LIMITS OF $1,000,000 PER OCCURRENCE. COLLIER
COUNTY IS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED, AND SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, WHERE REQUIRED BY CONTRACT AND SUBJECT TO POLICY TERMS
AND CONDITIONS.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
3578108
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIOr--TERS
A TIN, L YN M. WOOD C.P.M.
3301 T AMIAMI TRAIL EAST
NAPLES FL 34112
CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION
DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN
NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL
IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR
REPRESENTATIVES.
AUTHOR PRESENTATIVE
ACORD 25 (2001/08)
Forquesllons regarding this certifica1e, contact Ihe number listeol in the 'Prooluc er'seclionaboveandspecifylheclie ode'
,,';
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 F'1'
. TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENr TO
TEE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMrSSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE . .
Prim on pink paper. Att1d1 '" origioaldN-mn-' Origioal rl~m_" 3lIouJd be IwId delivered '" tbc Board 0tIice. Thtcomploled ","liDg ,Up and original
rl~-",,""'betbtwmled"'tbcBoardotlio:onIy~1!IaBoaaIhu_aclioII.OIltbci-') . . .. .. ..
..... ROUTING SLIP .
.Comph:oo roaIing IiDcs Illllrouglll4 as ~ tix addililml nglWllXO!, -. mdlor iD!acnation aeeded.1t tbc .......;,_; i.! aI=dy compleo: with tbc
=donaftbcn",;,."""", . dnw.1inc throul!l -~ _'1 <IIron.m 114, """",!eo: tbc <:IJe::klbt; md ti:nvd '" S... fiJ!aa (liDo 115). .
Route to Addressee(s) . Office Initials Date
(Ibr in ","au ardor) " - .
L' ...
-.
---------..... .
--
z. ---.~
------
.~.
"-
3. '. -~
, '. .
-'..
'- -
-- -.
4. ....-.....
--~~
5. Sue FIlson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners .
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office -
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
('!be primary COI1CICt i.! tbc bolder of tbc origiDal rl~-' p=ding Bee approval. Nonmtlly me primary COlI",", i.! tbc p"",on who =:m:dIJn'PlUCd tbc executive
!lUIlDIlIry. Primary - ilzfcnnatiCl1 i.! - iD tbc CVCIU ace of tbc oddr== >bow. iDclw:!ing Sue Rlscn. l1=! '" <;llltlCt mff tix addiJ:ioaal or orissing
iDfcrm:uico. All origiJW d<>:umc1.. ccoriiDg tbc Bee CllaUmm's sigllll_ ow '" be dcUvc=I '" me Bee office only _ tbc BCe bu lU:lCd '" approve me
item.)
Name of Primary Staff ! 1..
Contact I . Ii "-(,- <-
Agenda Dare Item wa:s
ved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Phone Number
t 7 Y 3
0' r I
Agenda Item Number
c:;, c;J (,.
I, Fol
{'
(-
Number of Original
Documents Attached
fl I" I oj
I
1 -'-<_. I
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in tile Not Applicable column. whichever is Yes N/A (Not
. ce. (Initial) licable)
Original document has been signedfmitialed for legal sUfficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with !he exception of most Ieaers, must be reviewed and signed
liy tile Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances. .
resolutions, etc. signed by the County AlIorney's Office and signature pages from I\~
contracts, llgI'el:ml:nts, etc. tbat have been fully executed by all parties except tile BeC
Chairman and Clerk: to the Board and I State Officials.)
All halldwritten.strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney: s r /\
Office and all other arties the BCC Cb.airman and the Clc:rk to the Board . {i -,...\.
The ChaiIlpan's signature line date ha:s been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the '_____
document or the final ne dated contract date whichever is Iicable. tv,
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si and initials are r
In most ca:ses (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue FUson in the BCC office within 24 houn ofBCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to T.IT.h"see within a cc:rtain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be a of our ,i~.,iHn",,!
The docmnent was approved by the BCC on.) ._' u t' (enter date) and all changes
made durUsg the meeting have been incorpo in the attached document. The
Coon Attorn's Office bas reviewed the as, if a licable.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
l: FomW County _ Bee FonmI Original Documc:Ia Rooricg Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, RcvUcd 2.24.0:1
16ff
~
MEMORANDUM
Date:
February 26, 2008
To:
Michael Dowling, Property Management Specialist
Real Estate Services
From:
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Fifth Amendment to a Lease Agreement
with Gulf Shore Associates, Limited Partnership
Attached please find the original document, as referenced above (Agenda
Item #16Fl) approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday,
February 26, 2008.
After forwardinl! to the appropriate party for signature, please return the
fully executed oril!inal to the Minutes and Records Department where it will
be kept as part of the Board's permanent record.
If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-8411,
Thank you.
Attachments (1)
16Fl
Lease #744
FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT
--p~
THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT entered into this co2 (,.; day of
re 6Lco:"L y , 2008 at Naples, Collier County, Florida by and between Gulf Shore
Associates, LimIted Partnership, whose address is 1300 Post Road East, Westport, Connecticul
06880, hereinafter referred to as "LESSOR", and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of
the Stale of Florida, whose mailing address is 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112,
hereinafter referred to as "LESSEE".
WITNESSETH
WIIEREAS, Collier County and Gulf Shore Associates have previously entered into a Lease
Agreement dated March 31, 1992, an Amendment to Lease Agreement dated February 6, 1996, a
Second Amendment to Lease Agreement dated February 25, 2003, a Third Amendment to Lease
Agreement dated April 27, 2004, and a Fourth Amendment to Lease Agreement dated February 14,
2006.
WIIEREAS, the LESSOR and LESSEE are desirous of amending the Lease Agreement,
Amendment To Lease Agreement, Second Amendment to Lease Agreement, Third Amendment to
Lease Agreement, and the Fourth Amendment to Lease Agreement, and
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements provided within said Fourth
Amendment to Lease Agreement dated February 14, 2006, and Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other
valuable consideration, said Lease Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
I. The following provision shall be added to Article 2 of the Amendment to Lease Agreement:
This Lease is hereby extended until February 28,201 I, hereinafter referred to as 'Renewal
Lease Term.' LESSEE hereby acknowledges that LESSOR has provided response to its request to
extend the Lease tenn.
LESSEE shall have the right to renew this lease. following the February 28, 2011, Renewal
Lease Term, for one (I) additional term of three (3) years, hereinafter referred to a 'Option Term'.
LESSEE shall have the right, however, to terminate this Lease, with or without cause, by
providing 180 day prior written notice of such termination to LESSOR at the address set forth
above. Said notice period shall be effective upon receipt by LESSOR of the written notice.
The base rent for the period of February 29, 2008, to February 28, 2009, shall be $1,799.00
per month. The base rent for each year following the first year of the Renewal Lease Term shall be
increased by four percent, compounded, each year throughout the life of the Renewal Lease Term
and Option Term. The LESSEE is tax exempt.
The Common Area Maintenance rCAM') fees commencing as of March 1,2008 shall be
$1,000.00 per month. If LESSOR is required to increase the CAM during the life of this Lease, the
LESSOR shall notifY LESSEE, in writing, of any increase by March 31 of each year throughout the
life of the Lease.
2. Except as expressly provided herein, the Lease Agreement between Gulf Shore Associates,
Limited Partnership and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, for the
utilization of the Demised Premises described in said Lease Agreemenl dated March 3 I, 1992
remains in full force and effect according to the terms and conditions contained therein, and said
terms and conditions are applicable hereto except as expressly provided otherwise herein.
16Fl
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the LESSOR and LESSEE have hereto executed this Fifth
Amendment to Lease Agreement the day and year first above written.
AS TO THE LESSEE:
DATED: 0./...2(" ) 0 '(
ATTES~;: . . .
, .
.DWIGHT E.B~.pCK, Clerk
:-'~:~~
. Deputy~Ierk
',' Att.,~ It ~..CNlrwa ,
"i-! QIlltwr"Olil.
. , '.!: ~;.~; \. ~ .' .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,
COLLIE:JPUNTY, LORID~
BY:~
Tom Henning - Chairman
AS TO THE LESSOR:
DATED:
-_._-~._~--
Florida corporation
GULF SHORE ASSOCIATES,
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
by its General Partner, Pequol Capital South, Inc., a
BY:
ALBERT J. KLEBAN, President
Witness (Signature)
(Print Name)
-,
Witness (Signature)
(Print Name)
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
_~~<_9.~
. ~.j::'Ni0L?~ f\.6fL-PED:rO
'6 f\ s S~ .., -n'\ tV \' CO J (\.) 11/ t\, fTD e 10 t_ Y
2
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 r
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO ")
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE . <;
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or infonnation needed. If the document is already complete with the
exceotion of the Chainnan's sirnature, draw a line throUf!:t routio2lines #1 through #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routing order)
l. ..-------..
. "
2.
"------._-_._~_. ----..--.---.. --..
3.
-- .'.-, --....- "..
4.
<~~..,~---_..._--- ___ ___.m__"'_ ..
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners c'4(' :J ht,,/D ~
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
-*~d (v'h noS O:..'K'" .u..dl
.. ,
)
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.)
Name of Primary Staff
Contact
Agenda Date Item was
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
1.
'.')
(~IC" I \ \ ~) ll\ (O.:JlC,Vl ~::~:~t~~~~~:~d
(i .. Sc, n l~';SWmCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a fa nate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossihly State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the fmal ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aw e of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on (enter date) and all changes
made during the meeting have been incorporated 'in t e attached document. The
Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable. .
Phone Number
. , ,---
LI17"LL'C:~'.
I' fl ,(-i., !
I" . "
ILF-.~
,.,-)
i
Agenda Item Number
Yes
(Initial)
N/A(Not
A licable)
2.
~..
~t
( r
3.
(' iV'
I""
C'{iC:
4.
5.
cw~
Cj4('
6.
I: Forms! County Forms! BCe Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1_26.05, Revised 2.24.05
MEMORANDUM
Date:
February 27,2008
To:
Christine Chase
Emergency Management
From:
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Grant Application
Enclosed please find a original, as referenced above, (Agenda Item #16F2),
approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26,
2008.
If you should have any questions, please ca11252-8411.
Thank you,
Enclosure (I)
16F2
~,
~~
CHARLESH.BRONSON
COMMISSIONER
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Division of Forestry
VOLUNTEER FIRE ASSISTANCE GRANT APPLICATION
.
16F2
LEGAL NAME
Collier Count Board of Commissioners
ADDRESS
FORM OF ORGANIZA liON: (Municipal, Fire District, Non-Profit, County)
Ochopee Fire Control District
P.O.box 70
CITY
IF COUNTY, LIST VFD'S BENEFITING FROM GRANT:
STATE
COUNTY
EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN)
IS FIRE DEPARTMENT LOCATED IN AN INCORPORATED TOWN? WHAT IS THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ISO RATING? I
YES 0 NO jfl IF YES, NAME OF TOWN: I 7
POPULATION OF TOWN: i IS FIRE DEPARTMENT NIMS COMPLIANT? YES 4l: NO 0
CURRENT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH DOF? YES,g. NO 0
PROTECTED AREA: EST. POPULA TlON:1 SIZE: (So. MILES)r:-:-::-
4,100 1,10 DISTANCE OF CLOSEST MUTUAL AID FIRE DEPARTMENT:I 32
NAME OF FIRE DEPARTMENT: I In"", N~n1",
NUMBER OF FIREFIGHTERS: PAID: r;:; VOLUNTEERS: ~ HAS APPLICANT RECEIVED GRANT FUNDS FROM ANY SOURCE IN
THE PAST 12 MONTHS? YES 0 NOJi)
NO. OF INCIDENTS PAST YEAR: WILDLAND FIRE:rn- OTHER: r684 IF YES, WHERE? I
NO. OF FIREFIGHTERS CERTIFIED AS: AMOUNT: $ 1
WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER' r20 WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER II r-
LIST TOTAL FUNDS RECEIVED FROM OTHER TAXING AUTHORITIES
SUCH AS CITY, COUNTY, TAXING DISTRICTS (Past 12 Months)
AMOUNT, $ I
LIST OF FJREFIGHTING VEHICLES:
TYPE
engine 2
engine
rus
Brush
PUMP CAPACITY (GPM)
WATER CAPACITY (GAL)
1000
1000
750
ESTIMATED GRANT FUNDING REQUEST: LIST OF EQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES TO PURCHASE WITH GRANT FUNDS:
FEDERAL $ 5,220 NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
APPLICANT $ :>,.<.<u 7u C.1ass A Loam u-.v.vv
COUNTY $ ~u Wl.1u.canu C.10Ullng se~s ':J,uvv.
TOTAL $ ~u,
(Federal nol more than 50% of total. Applicant at least 50% of
total in matching funds.)
o
We understand that this is a 50 percent maximum cost~share program (Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978. PL 954313), and that funds on
deposit up to 50 percent of the actual purchase price of the items approved will be committed to our project. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND
BELIEF, ALL DATA IN THIS APPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT HAS DULY AUTHORIZED
THIS DOCUMENT.
Title
Chainnan of Board
Board of County C
Date Signed and Submitted
J/J("/o~
Telephone Number: ( 2 3 9 6 9 5- L.lll'"
sW:opers) J 1 (1- 'G / '1"'/71
EmaiJ:
::. _. :
" ...~:'(, ':.;:~~:
'.'
.. ~,.)~ i;~J
;~~;!~~':;p"~r . ';:;~f'\"'u . ('~ ~gK"; ':";
. 'j:'~'(j.C' :~,,:.v."':, ,,~
~~{~_\o ~l"'" 11
16F2
OMB Approval No. 0348..0040
Note:
ASSURANCES -- NON-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS
Certain of these assurances may not be applicable to your project or program. If you have questions, please contact the awarding agency.
Further, certain Federal awarding agencies may require applicants to certify to additional assurances. If such is the case, you will be
notified.
As the duly authorized representative of the aoolicant I certify that the aoolicant
1. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance, and the
institutional, managerial and financial capability (including funds
sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of project costs) to ensure
proper planning, management and completion of the project
described in this application.
2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the
United States, and if appropriate, the State, through any authorized
representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books,
papers, or documents related to the award; and will establish a proper
accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting
standards or agency directives.
3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using
their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the
appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or
personal gain.
4. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time
frame after receipt of approval of the awarding agency.
5. Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970
(42 U.S.c. !Is 4728A763) relating to prescribed standards for merit
systems for programs funded under one of the nineteen statutes or
regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit
System of Personnel Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F).
6. Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to
nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a)Title VI
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits
discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; (b) Title
IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.c. 9*
1681-1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the
basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended (29 U.S.c. 9 794), which prohibits discrimination on the
basis of handicaps; (d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as
amended (42 U.S.c. 9* 6101.6107), which prohibits discrimination
on the basis of age;
(e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-
255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug
abuse; (f) the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-616),
as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol
abuse or alcoholism; (g) 9* 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service
Act of 1912 (42 U.S.c. 290-dd.3 and 290 ee-3), as amended, relating
to contidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records; (h) Title
VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. I 3601 et seq.), as
amended, relating 10 nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing
of housing; (1) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific
statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being
made; and U) the requirements of any other nondiscrimination
statute(s) which may apply to the application.
7. Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements of
Titles II and III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 961-646) which
provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or
whose property is acquired as a result of Federal or federally assisted
programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property
acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal participation in
purchases.
8. Will comply with the provisions of the Health Act (5 U.S.c. 99
1501~1508 and 7324-7328) which limit the political activities of
employees whose principal employment activities are funded in
whole or in part with Federal funds.
9. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis-
Bacon Act (40 U.S.c. II 276a to 276a-7), the Copeland Act (40
U.S.c. I 276c and 18 U.S.c. II 874), and the Contract Work Hours
and Safety Standards Act (40 U.s.c. II 327-333), regarding labor
standards for federally assisted construction subagreements.
10. Will comply, if applicable, with flood insurance purchase
requirements of Section 102 (a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act
of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires recipients in a special flood
hazard area to participate in the
program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable
construction and acquisition of $1 0,000 or more.
11. Will comply with environmental standards which may be
prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of environmental
quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; (b)
notification of violating facilities pursuant to EO 11738; (c)
protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; (d) evaluation of flood
hazards in floodplains in accordance with EO 11988; (e) assurance of
project consistency with the approved State management program
developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16
D.S.C. ~~ 1451 et seq.); (f) conformity of Federal actions to State
(Clear Air) Implementation Plans under Section I 76(c) of the Clear
Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.c. * 7401 et seq.); (g)
protection of underground sources of drinking water under the Safe
Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended, (P.L. 93.523); and (h)
protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended, (P.L 93-205).
12. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16
U.S.c. S~ 1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential
components of the national wild and scenic rivers system.
V, 8.5 (02/05)
Authorized for Local Reproduction
Standard Fonn 424B (9.03)prescribed by OMB Circular A-102
13. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as
amended (16 U.S.c. 470), EO 11593 (identification and protection of
historic properties), and the Archeological and Historic Preservation
Act of 1974 (16 U.S.c. 469a-1 et seg.).
research, teaching, or other activities supported by this award of
assistance.
26F2
16. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention
Act (42 U.s.c. ii 4801 et seg.) which prohihits the use of lead hased
paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures.
14. Will comply with P.L. 93.348 regarding the protection of
human subjects involved in research, development, and related
activities supported by this award of assistance.
17. Will cause to be performed the required financial and
compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984.
IS. Will comply with the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966
(P.L. 89-544, as amended, 7 U.S.c. 2131 et seq.) pertaining to the
care, handling, and treatment of warm blooded animals held for
18. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other
Federal laws, executive orders, regulations and policies governing
this program.
TITLE
Ill" Hl'llt\lf'!\
Chairman, Boar~of County Commissione s
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION
DATE
SUBMITTED
Q/i.' Ie> r
,<f
i.~1n~_'_
.'.~. ,.).
.' 'y~nS . V,'
t"!....!"\'"'" {i,'-r'i.I~'h" (ft.'J.,
~~~;~V~\Z~,
. Attest u to ~1.~ t,",
siQn.!tltril Of1\ ......\....." ",,-".,""';j' V,B-6(02/05)
'. 4"!t .... '..," .~f~~ed for Local Reproduction)
". U "".1",_.;1, .~;'" StandardForm424B (9-03
",! '.'''.~~.'~!.., l' Prescribed by OMB Circular A-I02
, 0-
....);, ..
""1 ,1~
J,6F2
Form AD-] 047 (1/92)
us. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other
Responsibility Matters - Primary Covered Transactions
This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension,
7 CFR Part 3017, Section 3017.510, Participants' responsibilities. The regulations were published as Part IV of the
January 30,1989, Federal R"ister(pages 4722.4733), Copies of the regulations may be obtained by contacting the
Department of Agriculture agency offering the proposed covered transaction.
(Before completing certIfIcation, read Instructions on reverse.)
OJ The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
(a) are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency;
(b) have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment
rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or Local) transaction or contract under a
public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft,
forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen
property;
(c) are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity
(Federal, State or Local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph O)(b) of this
certification; and
(d) have not within a three. year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public
transactions (Federal, State or Local) terminated for cause or default.
(2) Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification,
such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
ORGANIZATION NAME PRlA WARD NUMBER OR PROJECT NAME
Collier County Board of County Ochopee Fire Control District
Comnissioners
NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
SIGNATURE
DATE
.'
I' "-...
....
">';;J/JL/e ?:
_ ... . ~~.i:
"
. n ,-". ,... ',.', . "LX;j
_..~7!1~..
"EST.!.: .~ ','n
\ '~'~G:;i::: ':::~~~G~ 'k
~,...~ ,f.o'ClWll'WM'
i1l1i1.t.... 'JIt1 ~
07 /"
" /(
,...
,
;)
.....
Form AD-1047 11/92) (REVERSE)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CERTIFICATION
1. By signing and submitting this form, the prospective primary participant is providing the certification set out
on the reverse side in accordance with these instructions.
2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of
participation in this covered transaction. The prospective participant shall submit an explanation of why it
cannot provide the certification set out on this form. The certification or explanation will be considered in
connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However,
failure of the prospective primary participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualifY such
person from participation in this transaction.
3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the
department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective
primary participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to
the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default.
4. The prospective primary participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to
whom this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary participant learns that its certification
was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
5. The terms "covered transaction," "debarred," "suspended," tlineligible," "lower tier covered transaction,"
"participant," "person," "primary covered transaction," "principal," "proposal, tl and tlvoluntarily excluded," as
used in this clause, have the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of the rules
implementing Executive Order 12549. You may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is
being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.
6. The prospective primary participant agrees by submitting this form that, should the proposed covered
transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person
who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered
transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction.
7. The prospective primary participant further agrees by submitting this form that it will include this clause
titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion _ Lower Tier
Covered Transactions," provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without
modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions.
8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification ofa prospective participant in a lower tier
covered transaction that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered
transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and
frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each participant may, but is not required to,
check the Nonprocurement List.
9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order
to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a
participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in lhe ordinary
course of business dealings.
10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered
transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred,
ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies
available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or
default.
2
16F2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the submittal of a Volunteer Fire Assistance
grant application to the Florida Division of Forestry for the purchase of wild
land firefighting equipment and protective clothing.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain Board of County Commissioners approval of an application
for a Volunteer Fire Assistance matching (50/50) grant for the purchase of wild land
firefighting equipment and protective clothing.
CONSIDERATIONS: Ochopee Fire Rescue District has received this type of grant
from the Division of Forestry in past years. The grant has been used to purchase
equipment to improve firefighter safety and firefighting capabilities.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of the equipment requested this year is $10,440. As
this is a 50/50 matching grant, the Division of Forestry will pay $5,220 leaving the
Ochopee Fire Rescue District to provide $5,220 from the contingencies line of Fund 144
(Ochopee Fire Rescue). Following award, budget amendments will be needed in order to
transfer funds to Fund 118, Emergency Management and Fire Grants.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management Impact
associated with this Executive Summary.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners authorize the
Chairman to sign the Florida Division of Forestry Volunteer Fire Assistance Grant
application and approve the budget amendments needed upon award of the grant.
Prepared Bv: Alan McLaul!hlin, Interim Fire Chief
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 1 6 F
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 3 'l"\j
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE .
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
excention of the Chairman's sie:nature, draw a line throulrl1 routing lines #1 throulZh #4, comnlete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #51-
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routin9" order1
1. -- .
2. -.-."
3. -- --.,
.
4.
"
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners I~ /}(1 c")!d-W /tfJ
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the BCC Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the BCC office only after the BeC has acted to approve the
item.
6.
hI \<...H ..~C\l,,(~<:'()
':). :) lo ua
Gn:l'''-: \~ ')\\'cc,',t(CY\ ~::~~~t~~~~~:~d
C' ('
ex. ~\.U'l""o-,~j
lNSTRUCTlONS & CHECKLIST
itial the Yes column or mark "N/ A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re aired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on I' (enter date) and all changes
made during the meeting have been incorporatell in t e attached document. The
Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable.
Phone Number
ell '?I.ocn'-)
/GF3
Name of Primary Staff
Contact
Agenda Date Item was
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document
Attached
Agenda Item Number
'X rred QvilroQ
Ve...-kc
Yes
(Initial)
N/A (Not
A licable)
1.
r ':~
2.
,"',
3.
("~ "
.....~IIl'_..
,,::it:::.
4.
5.
C:f\C
,.1\/?
.11==--
I: Forms! County Forms! BCe Formsl Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Origina19.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
16 --....
If ,)
MEMORANDUM
Date:
February 27,2008
To:
Christine Chase
Emergency Management
From:
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Grant Application
Enclosed please find a original, as referenced above, (Agenda Item #16F3),
approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26,
2008.
If you should have any questions, please call 252-8411.
Thank you.
Enclosure (1)
.
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Division of Forestry
VOLUNTEER FIRE ASSISTANCE GRANT APPLICATION
16F3
.
f:''t-
CHARLES H. BRONSON
COMMISSIONER
LEGAL NAME
FORM OF ORGANIZATION: (Municipal, Fire District. Non-Profit, County)
t Board of Commissioners
ADDRESS
175 Ca ri Blvd.
CITY
Na les
STATE ZIP
FL 34113
COUNTY COUNTY #
Isles of Capri Fire Rescue District
IF COUNTY, LIST VFO'S BENEFITING FROM GRANT
EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN)
IS FIRE DEPARTMENT LOCATED IN AN INCORPORATED TOWN?
YES D NO [lJ IF YES. NAME OF TOWN
POPULATION OF TOWN: I
PROTECTED AREA EST POPULA nON I
3,200
SIZE (SO M/LES)I 19
WHAT IS THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ISO RATING? i 4
IS FIRE DEPARTMENT NIMS COMPLIANT? YESltJ NO D
CURRENT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH DOF? YES ISl NO D
DISTANCE OF CLOSEST MUTUAL AID FIRE DEPARTMENT I 3
NAME OF FIRE DEPARTMENT I
Marco Island
NUMBER OF FIREFIGHTERS' PAID: fl2 VOLUNTEERS'
NO. OF INCIDENTS PAST YEAR WILDLAND FIRE~ OTHER
NO_ OF FIREFIGHTERS CERTIFIED AS
WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER I fl3
r-s
I73l
HAS APPLICANT RECEIVED GRANT FUNDS FROM ANY SOURCE IN
THE PAST 12 MONTHS? YES KI NO D
IF YES, WHERE? I Di v. of Forestry
AMOUNT S I 1670.00
LIST TOTAL FUNDS RECEIVED FROM OTHER TAXING AUTHORITIES
SUCH AS CITY, COUNTY, TAXING DISTRICTS (Past 12 Months)
AMOUNT $ I
WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER 1/ ~
LIST OF FIREFIGHTING VEHICLES
TYPE MAKEIYR.MODEL PUMP CAPACITY (GPM) WATER CAPACITY (GAL.)
Enoine E-One 2005 Typhoon 1500 780
Enaine E-One 2005 Tvohoon 1500 780
Brush Humvee 1997 250 310
ESTIMATED GRANT FUNDING REQUEST: LIST OF eQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES TO PURCHASE WITH GRANT FUNDS:
FEDERAL S 2,392.00 NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
APPLICANT $ 2.1Q? 00 12 Wildland Interface Coats 3204.00
COUNTY $ 5 Fire Shelters 1160.00
TOTAL $ 4 784.00 30 Gallons Class A Foam 420.00
(Federal not more than 50% of total Applicant at least 50% of
total in matching funds.)
We understand that this is a 50 percent maximum cost-share program (Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978, PL 95-313), and that funds on
deposit up to 50 percent of the actual purchase price of the items approved will be committed to our project. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND
BELIEF, ALL DATA IN THIS APPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT HAS DULY AUTHORIZED
THIS DOCUMENT.
Type Name of Authorized Representative
Title Chainnan, Collier
County Board of County
Telephone Numbe~"(';;3Cj;!~'394--8nO
", .-" 'j". ';. _':~. r" " '
FAX ( .r - - .. .:;")
~. - ~
"." '.
Date Signed and Submitted
Email:
J /:J L.l (51\
""~1f1~.i':}
AS'] '.:;"'".' ";J '.. "";~';r; '';1
~, ~.
"
".'~
~.~i~~~.[
16F3 -.
OM8 Approval No. 0348-0040
Note:
ASSlJRANCES - '<ON-CO'<STRtCTlON PROGRA~S
Certain of these assurances may not be applicable to your project or program. If you have questions. please contact the awarding agency.
Further. certain Federal awarding agencies may require applicants to certify to additional assurances. If such is the case, you will be
notified.
As the dulv authorized renresentative of the annlicant I certify that the aoolicant:
I. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance. and the
institutional. managerial and financial capability (including funds
sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of project costs) to ensure
proper planning, management and completion of the project
described in this application.
2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the
United States, and if appropriate, the State, through any authorized
representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books,
papers, or documents related to the award; and will establish a proper
accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting
standards or agency directives.
3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using
their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the
appearance of personal or organizational contlict of interest. or
personal gain.
4. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time
frame after receipt of approval of the awarding agency.
5. Will compl)' with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970
(42 U.S.C. ~~ 4728-4763) relating to prescribed standards for merit
systems tor programs funded under one of the nineteen statutes or
regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit
System of Personnel Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F).
6. Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to
nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a)Title VI
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits
discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; (b) Title
IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.c. ~~
1681-1683, and 1685-1686), Vvhich prohibits discrimination on the
basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended (29 U.S.c. ~ 794). which prohibits discrimination on the
basis of handicaps; (d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as
amended (42 U.S.c. ~~ 6101-6107). which prohibits discrimination
on the basis of age:
(e) the Drug Abuse Oflice and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-
255). as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug
abuse: (I) the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-616),
as amended. relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol
abuse or alcoholism: (g) ~~ 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service
Act of 1912 (42 U .S.c. 290-dd-3 and 290 ee-3). as amended. relating
to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records: (h) Title
VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.e. ~ 3601 et seq.), as
amended, relating to nondiscrimination in the sale. rental or tinancing
of housing: (I) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the spccitic
statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being
made; and U) the requirements of any other nondiscrimination
statute(s) which may apply to the application.
7. Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements of
Titles II and III of the Unifonn Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Pol. 96J~646) which
provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or
whose property is acquired as a result of Federal or federally assisted
programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property
acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal participation in
purchases.
8. Will comply with the provisions of the Health Act (5 U.S.c. ~~
1501-1508 and 7324.7328) which limit the political activities of
employees whose principal employment activities are funded in
whole or in part with Federal funds.
9. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis-
Bacon Act (40 U.S.c. ~~ 276a to 276a.7). the Copeland Act (40
lJ.S.c. ~ 276c and 18 U.S.c. ~~ 874), and the Contract Work Hours
and Safety Standards Act (40 U.s.c. ~~ 327-333), regarding labor
standards for federally assisted construction subagreements.
10. Will comply. if applicable, with tlood insurance purchase
requirements of Section 102 (a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act
of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires recipients in a special tlood
hazard area to participate in the
program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable
construction and acquisition of$10,000 or more.
II. Will comply with environmental standards which may be
prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of environmental
quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; (h)
notification of violating facilities pursuant to EO 11738: (c)
protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; (d) evaluation offload
hazards in floodplains in accordance with EO 11988: (e) assurance of
project consistency with the approved State management program
developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16
USe. ~~ 1451 et seq.); (t) conformity of Federal actions to State
(Clear Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Ch.:ar
Air Act of 1955. as amended (42 U.S.e. ~ 7401 et scq.): (g)
protection of underground sources of drinking "ater under the Safe
Drinking Water Act of 1974. as amended_ (P.L. 93~52J): and (h)
protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species Act
of 1973. as amended, (P.L. 93-205).
12. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16
USe. ~~ 1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential
components of the national wild and scenic rivers system.
V, 8-5 (02105)
Authorized for Local Reproduction
Standard Form 4248 (9-03)prescribed by OMS Circular A.l02
13. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as
amended (16 V.S.c. 470). EO 11593 (identitication and protection of
historic properties). and the Archeological and Historic Preservation
Act of 1974 (16 U.S.c. 4690-1 et seq.).
14. Will comply with P.L. 93~348 regarding the protection of
human subjects involved in research. development. and related
activities supported by this award of assistance.
15. Will comply with the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966
(P.L. 89-544. as amended. 7 U.S.c. 2131 et seq.) pertaining to the
care, handling. and treatment of warm blooded animals held for
CERTIFYI~G OFFICIAL
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION
Collier Count Board of Count commissioners
.' (~iJ)i",,_S...'." '.:EL.'.'.m~r~~iC)
--1..:~f11
Ass;;. . t",~~':j ~;.. I:LL.J(fi21
16 F 3 j~
research, teaching. or other activities supported by this award of
assistance.
16. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention
Act (42 U.S.c. ** 4801 et seq.) which prohibits the use of lead based
paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures.
17. Will cause to be performed the required financial and
compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984.
18. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other
Federal laws. executive orders. regulations and policies governing
this program.
TITLE
'Ion, I b\\ \\ I\.(\
Chairman, Boardl of County Corrmissioners
DATE / I
SUBMITTED ') ,)J, (J'
:'.-("
"';,i ':
. 'f')
~,,"(\ J..:. "'~'~:"~6
~.R~.8tl .~
, -,
Att.,t IS to ~I~ ,
'j-"tlOt't ..I ~,;., .....' .., ,:-? v, 8-6 (02/05)
II T' ';~1 ~.,...A~forLocaIReproductlon)
,j'.. ),: J . Standard Form 4248 (9-03
Prescribed by OMS Circular A-I 02
"
16F3 "
Form AD-1047 (J/92)
u. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other
Responsibility Matters. Primary Covered Transactions
This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, Dcbarment and Suspension,
7 CFR Part 3017, Section 3017.510, Participants' responsibilities. The regulations were published as Part IV of the
January 30. 1989, Federal Rel1ister(pages 4722-4733). Copies of the regulations may be obtained by contacting the
Department of Agriculture agency offering the proposed covered transaction.
(Before completing certification, read instructions on reverse)
(I) The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
(a) are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency;
(b) have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment
rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or Local) transaction or contract under a
public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft,
forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen
property;
(c) are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity
(Federal, State or Local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (I)(b) of this
certification; and
(d) have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public
transactions (Federal, State or Local) terminated for cause or default.
(2) Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification,
such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
ORGANIZA TION NAME
Collier County Board of County
Corrmissioners
PRlA WARD NUMBER OR PROJECTNAME
Isles of Capri Fire Rescue District
,VAME AND TlTLE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Tom Henning
Chairman
DATE
'"JhL, /o'~
.r,'
, . .
'~~.
h",.:: I .~." \,\.. ~;, ",J ,..y..-, ..,.}
. .,:~1,~" i 1/::1 .' .....:.
_ 'r.';' ,..,'-, r't","i~"';. '.--C i \~. t_l
";~'~('.',5'''~~
0L ~ -'--. __:.. ..'
" ',_. .\<,:. . 'V ""C.
~ a,~pilt~,,\.>, ,
'11 J....~t~\l,~~~.'~' ~ .
l6F3
Form AD-I047 (J/92)(REVER5E)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CERTIFICATION
1. By signing and submitting this form, the prospective primary participant is providing the certification set out
on the reverse side in accordance with these instructions.
2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of
participation in this covered transaction. The prospective participant shall submit an explanation of why it
cannot provide the certification set out on this form. The certification or explanation will be considered in
connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However.
failure of the prospective primary participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualifY such
person from participation in this transaction.
3. The certification in this clause is a material representation offact upon which reliance was placed when the
department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective
primary participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to
the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default.
4. The prospective primary participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to
whom this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary participant learns that its certification
was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
5. The terms "covered transaction," "debarred," "suspended," lIineligible," "lower tier covered transaction,"
"participant," "person," "primary covered trarisacticin," "principal," "proposal," and "voluntarily excluded," as
used in this clause, have the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of the rules
implementing Executive Order 12549. You may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is
being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.
6. The prospective primary participant agrees by submitting this form that, should the proposed covered
transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person
who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered
transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction.
7. The prospective primary participant further agrees by submitting this form that it will include this clause
titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier
Covered Transactions," provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without
modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions.
8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier
covered transaction that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered
transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and
frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each participant may, but is not required to,
check the Nonprocurement List.
9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment ofa system of records in order
to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a
participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary
course of business dealings.
10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered
transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred,
ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies
available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or
default.
2
16F3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the submittal of a Volunteer Fire Assistance
grant application to the Florida Division of Forestry for the purchase of wild
land firefighting equipment and protective clothing.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain Board of County Commissioners approval of an application
for a Volunteer Fire Assistance matching (50/50) grant for the purchase of wild land
firefighting equipment and protective clothing.
CONSIDERATIONS: Isles of Capri Fire Rescue District has received this type of grant
from the Division of Forestry in past years, including $1,670 awarded in 2007 and $4,777
awarded in 2006. The grant has been used to purchase equipment to improve firefighter
safety and firefighting capabilities.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of the equipment requested this year is $4,784. As
this is a 50/50 matching grant, the Division of Forestry will pay $2,392 leaving the Isles
of Capri Fire Rescue District to provide $2,392 from the contingencies line of Fund 144
(Isles of Capri Fire Rescue). Following award, budget amendments will be needed in
order to transfer funds to Fund 118, Emergency Management and Fire Grants.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management Impact
associated with this Executive Summary.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners authorize the
Chairman to sign the Florida Division of Forestry Volunteer Fire Assistance Grant
application and approve the budget amendments needed upon award of the grant.
Prepared Bv: Emilio Rodril!:uez. Fire Chief
1661
MEMORANDUM
Date:
February 27,2008
To:
David L. Jackson
Executive Director/CRA
2408 Lindwood Ave, Suite 7
Unit II
Naples, Florida 34112
From:
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Agenda Item #16Gl:
Amendment to Extend Grant Agreement
Attached, for your records, please find one certified copy as referenced
above (Agenda Item #16Gl) approved by the Board of County
Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008.
The Minutes & Records Department has retained an original document for
the record.
If you should have any questions, please contact me at 774-8411.
Thank you,
Attachments
.1:\8"" IG('; i I'Uj/l"lAMI
Fl:=0>Zy ( Z""g> VnlUIIVT'O G
AMENDMENT TO EXTEND GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BAYSHORE GATEWAY 1
TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND OWNER FOR SITE IMPROVEMENT
GRANT COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION
THIS AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT ENTERED into this 26th day of February 2008 by and
between the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency (hereinafter referred to as "CRA") and Phillip
and Debra Pierce (hereinafter referred to as "Owner") (collectively, the "Parties").
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, Owner has previously applied for and entered into an approved Site Improvement Grant
Agreement for property located at 3] 44 Pine Tree Drive in the amount of$7,055.00 dollars; and
WHEREAS, the Owner has requested an extension of the time to complete construction of Site
Improvemenls under that Agreement due to construction and permitting related delays.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenanls contained herein and other valuable
consideration, the Parties agree as follows:
I. Owner agrees to complete the construction of the Site Improvements no later than April 30, 2008, and
all other terms of the Parties' Agreement will remain in effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment to Agreement on the date and
ss Sign tff'e
'bvf;:ANOI( ~v181R[)N C
Printed/Typed Name
O:lL2
<=--..
(I)
By:
(2)
Witness Signa e
D~ .:.cl L. JS\c.k.rDY\
Printedrryped.Nawe
, :.y..' .... ..........'j;.
Debra Pierce
Printed/Typed Nam€
'~
COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY
REDEVELOP NT AGENCY
1664
MEMORANDUM
Date:
February 27,2008
To:
David L. Jackson
Executive Director/CRA
2408 Lindwood Ave, Suite 7
Unit 11
Naples, Florida 34112
From:
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Agenda Item #16G4:
Grant Agreement
Attached, for your records, please find one certified copy as referenced
above (Agenda Item #16G4) approved by the Board of County
Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008.
The Minutes & Records Department has retained an original document for
the record.
If you should have any questions, please contact me at 774-8411.
Thank you,
Attachments
2008 GRANT AGREEMENT
oKiG IN AL
31'(-M '1661(
f~P;7.-(f ,Ullg
GRANTAGREEMENTBETWEENCRAANDOWNER
FOR SWEAT EQUITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR
BAYSHORE/GA TEWA Y TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA
16Gb.
.
THIS AGREEMENT ENTERED this 2.bth day of ~hYIAfJ ~ ' 2.Q)~ by and
between the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency (h remafter referred to as
"CRA") and ~ <c~e\ ~ V-..c.t\C'( (hereinafter referred to as "Owner").
V~-U' Srel
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, in Collier County Ordinance No. 2002-38, the Board of County
Commissioners delegated authority to the CRA to award and administer CRA grants including
contracts with owners for CRA grants; and
WHEREAS, CRA Resolution No. 07-55 established the Sweat Equity Improvement
Grant; and
~ -:UJ WHEREAS, Owner has applied for a Sweat Equity Grant m the amount of
n"J .'l.r; dollars' and
,
WHEREAS, the CRA has determined that Owner meets the eligibility requirements and
was approved for a grant award in the amount of U ~:,. 2-S' dollars on
ftbr~ 7-(P , 2/)Og ("CRA Approval"), which is 100% of the costs to construct
the impro ments.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and
other valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:
I. Owner acknowledges to the CRA that Owner has received a copy of the Collier
County Community Sweat Equity Improvement Grant Program (hereinafter referred to as "Grant
Program"), that Owner has read the Grant Program, and that Owner has had ample opportunity
to discuss the Grant Program with Owner's counselor advisor. Owner further acknowledges to
the CRA that Owner understands and agrees to abide by all of the terms and conditions of the
Grant Program. Owner agrees to the terms and conditions of the Grant Program.
2. Owner is the record owner of property described as V;OO Lf~ sr, NAl'lE K. Yf-l \ "2-
3. Owner has agreed to make certain improvements to the property pursuant to the
grant application submitted to the CRA dated 11-' lit 161- attached hereto as
Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.
4. Owner agrees to complete the construction of the Sweat Equity Improvements
within ninety (90) days of CRA Approval. Owner also agrees to provide the seat equity (labor)
to complete the improvements.
Sweat Equity Grant Agreement FY2008
2008 GRANT AGREEMENT
16G4
5. CRA has approved a grant to Owner in the amount of ~:, . -u; to be
administered pursuant to the terms of this Agreement based on an estimated cost of
\\ ~~ . --;,x; . If the actual cost of materials are less than the estimated costs to construct the
improvements. the grant amount shall be reduced dollar for dollar in CRA funds; however in no
case will the cost of materials for improvements be less than $500.
6. Unless prior disclosure is included in the grant application. no Owner, or any
immediate relative of Owner, shall serve as a contractor or subcontractor for the construction of
the improvements and no Owner, or any immediate relative of Owner, shall receive
compensation for labor for the construction of the improvements. An immediate relative of
Owner shall include mother, father, brother, sister, aunt, uncle and cousin or family member by
marriage to include mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law and sister-in-law.
7. Owner agrees that all improvements completed do not require a Collier County
permit or permit from any other agency. Upon completion of the work, Owner shall submit to the
CRA staff a project summary report, two (2) 8 x 10 after photos, a list of materials and
construction techniques used, and any other information specific to the project or requested by
the CRA staff, The CRA, through its staff, shall confirm that the improvements were constructed
pursuant to the terms of the application approved by the CRA.
8. Within forty-five (45) days after confirmation that the improvements were
constructed pursuant to the terms of the approved application, Owner shall be issued a check in
the amount of the grant. However, if Owner fails to make the improvements pursuant to the
terms of the approved application, or if the project is not completed within ninety (90) days of
CRA approval, or if Owner fails to make improvements of at least $500 value, the grant shall be
deemed revoked and Owner shall be entitled to no funding.
9.
of Florida.
This Agreement shall be governed and construed pursuant to the laws of the State
10. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and their
representatives and agents, and incorporates all prior understandings, whether oral or written.
No change, modification or amendment, or any representation, promise or condition, or any
waiver, to this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized
officer of the party to be charged.
11. This Agreement is personal to Owner, and may not be assigned or transferred by
Owner or to Owner's respective heirs, personal representatives, successors or assigns without the
prior written consent of the CRA.
Sweat Equity Grant Agreement FY2008
')
2008 GRANT AGREEMENT
1664
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year
first written above.
,
o:~~u-
OA~ ref he ((^--
Printe yped Name
Mlcl-/I91L l(l9-;1/ O~.:s'{i;;'L
Printed/Typed Name
E
By ~__ ~JJtf!
I/€-l/~ VQ(1c1l!f~+ej
Printed/T ed Name
Witness Signature
5/fLJtJfr illI/5L'/J
PrintedlTyped ame r
ATTEST:
DWI9'ffii'~~I~~OCK, Clerk
','~:~k
~ . .'.;: ;peputyClerk
~t"$t "l!...C.~t1"lllll1
S(9li.t.......t.'. .
I ,j f; . ,,-. ~ . \', :.c .
COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
d
By:
A FIALA, Chairman
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
{).f.. -;Jt0ti~
MlIIjorie . Student-Sti ling
Assistant County Attorney
Sweat Equity Grant Agreement FY2008
,
.1
1664
BAYSHORE GATEW Y TRINGLE
~
L._...,J
~
/ -,
E33E33l:J
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
APPLICATION I,
,-, ,.." 'I In r-~- ,7 ,,--. ,-, '\ j" 'I ,..,
I , :
OC)
Michael and Kelly VanderStel
2500 Lee Street
Naples, Florida 34112
2008 GRANf APPLICATION 0
1664
SWEAT EQUITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION
Section 1: Applicant Information
Owner Name: >{ A//(/TtlFt W"9.V/}P/~ c<'7g(
Owner Address: v f) <DC) L../--:-F-'
Site Address (if different from owner address):
)r;?J 0 L-tb Srrz.a-,
rJ rll..'l6 ';J;41 { ?-
~ k~( VA1"Q{1t.Srec:.
Legal Description of Site: ,2.S r r-: (E E
Daytime Phone: fl..2cr /'---2D T -- C, s 41-
Alternate Phone:
E-Mail Address: M//cEV/\//lPt.A<; @ Aci ' r"D/I/(
How long have you owned this property?
,'S l/ ic7:;.A c
,
Number of Years in Business at Site Address:
Occupational License Number:
First Time Shereline Impruvement Grant Applicant?
y., ~ r ( ! i
(
Yes~
NoD
NoD
If no, how many applications submitted? Grant(s) awarded? Yes D
Sweat Equity Improvement Grant FY2008
4
Details
Page 1 of I
'J:C:E'miI.
: "
,
16G4
Pr"nerty ~ecord
A-erial
Sketct-:es
€I
Folio No.1 7641 0040008
Current Ownership
I Pn>perty Addressl2500 LEE ST
€I
OWner Nam
Add_
C
VANDERSTEL, MICHAEL=& KELLEY
2500 LEE ST
NAPLES Stale FL
Zip 34112 - 4728
Legall T AMIAMI HGTS LOTS 1
SectIon
11
Township
50
Ra e
25
Acres
0.16
Map No.
5A11
Sllap No.
655300 15A11
Sub No.
~ use.Cod!!
655300
1
TAMIAMI HEIGHTS
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
A...rg
~ Mm.1I!!
11.486
2007 Final Certified Tax Roll
(Subject to Change)
Latest Sales History
E-;:;E \hli"coi, shG\'m i~ciJ-\\' cq:mi~i
p<1(cd vws sreats!c 2;t0r tiE; Fin:,l T,,:~ r:oi,
Date dOOi, - ;~':;';0"- Amount
05 f 2004 3561 - 468 $195,000.00
02 f 2003 3227.-2793 $ 105,000.00
08 f 2002 3091-1919 $ 72,000.00
06 I 2002 3062 - 2415 $ 60,000.00
06 f 2002 3062 - 2414 $ 0.00
06 I 2002 3062 - 2413 $ 0.00
08 / 2000 2712- 1680 $ 0.00
01/1993 1786 - 2242 $ 0.00
Land Value $ 83,754.00
(+ 1m roved Value $ 172,249.00
(=) Markel Value $ 256,003.00
H SOH Exempt Value $ 91,028.00
{= Assessed Value $ 164,975.00
(-) Homestead and other Exempt Value $ 25,000.00
(=) Taxable Value $139,975.00
SOH '" "Save Our Homes" exempt value due to cap on assessment
increases.
'J:C:E'miI
The Information is Updated Weekly.
http://www.colJierappraiser.com/RecordDetail.asp?Map=&FoliolD=000007641 0040008
1/14/Z008
P~e 1 of,1
J.6LLL
,
~<l)
,~
'" CO;;"1\" P~.::;::>"t; ,',.
http://maps.collierappraiser .com/output/Collier 2007 sdeOZ65887 4604800, jpg
1/1412008
2008 GRANT APPLICA nON 1 6 G 4
. Landscaping installation, and improvement at front of building (visible from public
street), and must include in-ground irrigation system
. All work must be completed within 90 days of approval by CRA
Grant funds may not be used for:
. Working capital or administrative costs (payroll, rent, utilities, etc.)
. Sweat equity (time/labor of applicant or family)
. New construction
. Residential additions/expansions of existing buildings or on site
. Residential rental property - apartments or buildings with more than two units
. Interior renovations
. Seawalls or waterfront improvemenls
. Demolition only
. Loans or other capital support
. Work that will extend beyond ninety (90) days of approval by CRA
. Work completed prior to approval of Sweat Equity Improvement Grant
Project Evaluation
All projecls will be evaluated based upon the following:
. Number and extent of improvemenls (minimum 2 for residential)
. Ability to begin work immediately and ability to complete project within 90 days
. Remedy of code enforcement violations
Or
Points
Available
I
1
1
1
1
I
I
3
I
Points
Awarded
Project Provides
Ie
1
2
3
1
1
Subtotal
~~-
Sweat Equity Improvement Grant FY2008 (revised 119nOOS)
2
2008 GRANT APPLICATION
/
/
vt6 G 4.
Section 2: Project Information
Existing Condition of Project (attach additional sheets if necessary):
A'/CJ ElX~.../N G.- ... c., Pq.~ ~ p~C C " / .51:>1< I/Jc./5 ex. fiI2
VVDV{) y')C,', ~ fJ/2:~/ J/V<"y ,<:i{J/vrp lhC;i ..-
Prl2Li/J,f' LJE.."ylJ 71:1&"1=
ATfACH "BEFORE" PHOTOS AT LEAST TWO 8XlO COLOR PHOTOS, OTIIERS MAY BE ADDED
TO ACCURATELY DESCRIBE THE SITE).
Outline Proposed Improvements in Detail (attach additional sheets if necessary):
J;;CK3- 4L1 L4MQ"fJPF tf-4/J[) PDc:t
PEPL/k'P SFfJ 11/('';:' f)f)(JiD
(?'../j)j/V'p (JOY' C;- (/ /VIP 4-D f) JJ FVr/ 7J)~. '1=::-
List Materials to be Used and Construction Methods to be Utilized (i.e. type paint, plant species,
irrigation ~tem' dOOrslwt/?w.si etc.) (Attac~ addition:" sheets ifn~: J.
J:;tJCo.//1/ (.;,. .2 1)f) (71)LJ.:: .s PI I,-.. L
j!) /\)&12 . 1);::-:g J5 L~
PA-UYI T:l2EE-
Sweat Equity Improvement Grant FY2008
5
~.,
16Sl
,
Iv Wlttr 61B'1 rJ t(
~/ D~V8
/:LhcJL.S
~
~
'<.
""..! .'"L
'~:~;~,;" .. .T,J. ~, '~
'~~^" .(
'~?(.,
, .t.~;,~;j'
'. ~ ~;:..lk'r .. '
. ~.... ,.
\-~~~" ,
..." ~
: ,~...-
";';'4
.,.:'
,
"r!' /i t~
"~ c- ~) 4
PfUJi21\1TVG
/CoClLS -
tiDGl (J0 Gj
"
'''"
,
;,""W:
iI
-",.
.
I
,
'.
I
Or{.
'.
"j".
f
,
'.
i'
. %
"
,
.
"
.;
",
it":
..
... AJ,
\. t', .
... ..'v
" ~'\ ".,
.'",:
.
"
\.
." '\"
'w, ~/~ ";,..
.,
.,
.
"
.
""
",'<b ..
q- I __nnn
1.0'
0')'
0:
<.0:
.....'
I '
00:
'O::t:
M'
<.0:
,
. ,
0'
Z:
,
,
,
,
0'
,
~ ,
,,'
0>,
""
a. c
ID
o
~
ol
ro
o
MOl
0_
g::o<C
,0'"
MooO
ol-CO
r- -,
_~o
ol~
('I') C ..
N " C
_U ~ ..
~ ~
.. b CO Q)
Q) CO 0. $:
c ..... U) Q)
o c CO --
..c 0 - >
a..U~~
w
Wt')
~z
<(:J
z--'
Iii>
f-f-
::la:
00
wa.
WooIX:
1-'" -
OM <(
cow
=> ~......
00 ID
~(Q
w~
en
W
--'
a.
0<(
a:z
~
w
I-
o
::>
"
....
....
'"
"?
....
~ C>
E N
~
.
E
o
I
en
CO>
!::!
....
...
<
:c
c.:I
::iE
N
~
...
M
--'
U.
f-
W
W
f-
W
....W
...W
.....--'
(1)0
!:CO
...ID
ClN
25
<n
'I
E .~
<II ~ ---
~ ~ ~
~ 0 .
o E ~
~ <3 ~
a:
o
o
o
t')
z
u
a:
a.
w
W
--'
a. --'
<( u.
Z
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
....'
Q'
Q'
.....'
-,
CC ,
~,
- ,
- ,
.. ,
='
... ,
.s:::,
en.....'
c::!-=t
NO- J
:;=1
~>,
..:. U,I t
"":'" CD I
.... .. ,
g"': I
",a..'
"
a:
W
:J
--'
o
u
>
"
il
L>
N
~
~
...
M
o
N
'0
'"
"
;;
;;
lij-
::> -
C-
".
'"
~~
~"
'E~
-=t)
0::>
~o
~O
or
<=:Q
,,0
'"
~"
"'"
?'O
;;;c:
","
""
-0
,,;;;
E
>
0:
<(
:2:
:2:
:::>
en
w
(.)..
- ..
>=
0:>=
W-;:.:
CJ)~
C ii:
Z ii
<c i
w"
en;Z
- ..
C'"
z~
<(i!
J:'"
US
0:>=
W=:
:2:~
-'
l-
(/)
o
IX:
U.
t'l
Z
:)
I
U
IX:
<(
a:
I-
U
I
-'
o
00
X
<0
M
....
=I:l:
a..
:::l
::.=:
o
ii:
a:
w
:2
o
I-
C/)
:::l
o
C/)
W
o
:>
a:
w
C/)
~
W
C/)
Q
z
<(
:t:
o
a:
w
:2
..J
..J
<(
LL
o
C/)
w
t:'
a:
oCt
:t:
o
..J
<(
I-
o
I-
o ". ".
q M M ;;
~ .....: to <D
N -<I> 0 0
'" M M
'" '"
~ ....
co: =>
l:i ..
I- ....
...
'"
co:
~
co:
...
~
~
I~
<t
to
ol
o
CO
~
to
~
CO
16G4
~,
g
,f",r,J,
\;::;J.
.q
LO
0)
o
c.o
.....
I
to
.q
(Y)
c.o
o
Z
~
~
\~
~
'V
~\
&~
::,~A)
v;<--'
?:jA
-
o
"
0>
'"
a.
00 r----
, -----
I.C) , ---
en:
0'
CD:
.....'
,
I ,
00'
o:::t:
(Y)'
CD:
,
. ,
0'
z:
,
~,
,
,
0'
,
~,
,,'
0>,
""
"- c
I
,
\
~
'"
o
~
ol
cD
o
",ol
0_
~ocn
,00::
"'<Xl'"
Ol-I-
r-......J
_Qien
0> c ..
'" " c
~u ~ ..
h ~
.. 0 Q:l <D
Q:l CO a. ~
c...... (I) Q)
o C IV .-
J:: 0 - >
,,-u"'''
en 0::
L
I
en
wl9
ttZ
<(:J
z-'
::J
I"-
1-1-
::Jo::
00
en 0..
W<XlO::
I-<t-
"'<(
0'" en
=> ~.....
..... 0 '"
\J - '"
en~
en
w
-'
"-
0<(
o::z
~
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
,...,
='
Q'
.....'
-I
... ,
.- ,
;=,
.- ,
..I
""
"-,
-= 1
...1-1
"5I:"CI1
N=I
- ClI 1
~>I
~ fn I
~ c>> I
... CO 1
g"i: I
_________NCI.. t
<:t --
<:t
""
CD
,.:.
. C>
g N
~ 6i
E ...
~ ~
w
I-
o
;:)
o
w
I-
o
::J
o
'" ~ .2 a:
c Z a. w
&. ~ g :3
~ ~ ~ 0
~ u .s.: u
>
.
o
o
U
....
....
CC
:c
~
:!!
'"
~
~
<t
'"
'"
~
"
~
<t
'"
-'
L1.
I-
w
w
I-
en
....w
....w
1--'
(1)0
cz:0
....'"
C1'"
2;
CC~
~
en
w
-'
0.. -'
<( L1.
Z
o
'"
"
;:;
;:;
c _'
'"
:0
0-
".
'"
-:;;
"E
Eo
--
'"
0:0
-u
-0
Ct"
;:;E
,,0
.c'"
-"
"'"
~
"c
",,,,
~
,,:;;
E
>
a:
c::(
~
~
::>
en
W
(J.
S;U
a:~
W'"
cn-!
;;:
o ~
z "
<( ii
U
W
en::
- ..
0:2
Zit:
c::(Sil
Zen
(J:g
a:i;
W....
:iE~
....
:tl::
a..
:;:)
:.::
o
i5:
a:
w
~
e
l-
(/)
::>
o
I -
u
<(
w
a.
-' (f)
-' :J
<( 10
~ (f) 0
I- w Z
::J ffi ~
a. m '"
en w 0::
w a. <(
a5a:~
:::> W (f)
o ~ CD
o 0::
_ u.::;:
- u-'
~ In <{
.a.
Z
;;:
0'"
og
. N
~=
~
-
-
...
!C
..
OM'"
00 <t :::>
o l , ~
OOO>U
<D;~i:
..
...
~
:::>
..
...
::c
U
en
uu
>
a:
w
(/)
ell
w
CI)
S
z
<(
:z::
o
a:
w
~
...I
...I
<(
U.
e
CI)
w
C')
a:
<(
:z::
o
...I
<(
l-
e
I-
co
IS)
m
o
'"
~
cD
<t
...,
'"
o
Z
0::
w
Cl
0::
o
L1.
o
Cl
Z
w
--...-/)., ....
~" \
-/',.
'?
~~
7--:
\//
,
1664
'I"'" .>
\~"''''''''.
\-/-/<.
\":?r"),
!,.~/;~,j:)
71i>
"
00
It)
en
o
<.0
.-
,
00
'd"
M
<.0
o
Z
-
o
"
0>
'"
"-
,;
l ~
o -
~ 2
B ;~
! i!
~ ~l
. c; ..':!:
l3 ~ III ~
ii (I) ~ III
! ;:.; ?g'
'U ~-; l~
i ~~.~ ~2
~].: 2 ~
s~ ~ ~:Oil
-1l1C'.c:
.8 ..: ~ B
"'.!.~ >.;:
fi i1 f} ~ Q.
~~.Eii~
&:E.!2~
.. O~~"'i5
3 .!!! 8 lIl.g C
j t!:J:fi..!
011 ~ ~o; ~
! ~ioc~:
: .;;; i1;; ~
~~g:f~~;
j_2~.g-<<i.~~
;~ai~'&
..10_"0.
E~2-=gl!:
8_ ;-"11
=;=j.!!~~g
is J 2: 8 II> ::J__
i~:i!~g
.ail"';;C:':
... ~.~ 8.2.g
!~&;..iil
:~J:o~o__
ZChtil:a:Q:Q:
~
o
o
N
N
N
~
...I
<(
I-
Z
w
a:
...I
o
o
I-
I-
m
::;
w
()
-
a:
~
[i[EKii
~~~f*.~~
cncnOHftOllllD
0000_00
....,. .
Ii E E E Ii E E
~~it~i~
CD CCHCHIHD ...
0000000
~ !!l!!;:di!i
"""'~l-....CoO.
I
I
(f)
~~
Q.-
<(....
z""
::> ~
::co. N c
f-f- 0
::>0:: '-M_
00 VO II:
(f)a. MN 0
ex) a:: ...IN i
o::t::;: l.L.ri g
M..... 00)_
CO(f) ffil'-:
~w ~mi
B(Oo<((").
cn....a:z!::!cn
~
!
)
888888888888
g-iaioo-iciai<ciociN
l")~~::~~~~N~:;;~
888888888888
ciaiu:iciocOO<DN<'>it'li-i
~~~~~~~~,...::~:!
8888888g8888
O..,j-iciONO-iuiaiaciai
MMl")Mf')MMrl~"'''''M
888888888888
~(')..t":":M":-ipjci":ci
NNNNNNN('f....MMM
_OWr--"'O.-<ONON""
O.............NNNl")fOCOcn
1t)1D...IDIOW......lOonlQlt)
"
.;
~~
~~
u m:x:
e ~:
~ l~
i ~ 8
~ j-;;; ;; <:~
-i ~~ ~~~~~~jj;
~'E8i5'S":!~5>:ti~'ii
~~lD~~3;~~la~~
~.!!'ia;a;'i~~!~ .0
a.:fr:::'iii'iz...g1i~=o
E;; g'r::: c; a OJ G 'i l- c:l g'
o .....-1ii1ii~... > J::'S!:2.~
u~~:e:sgg~~:9:2~
;;(u..u..u..u..a:u-,oa::a;u..
~
N
.,
~
8888888
SO..t.oNr.iN
P)NV__...._
M__lI)OlOlGl
8 ~~~ ~~~~
:i Nom NVV....
::vv ""000
N NMf"lM
~ ~!l~ ~!l!l!l
;; maN lI)COOOCO
N__ co,..,....r-.
8 ~!l~ ~~!l~
..; o~., GOVf"lf"l
~ N vKlIOUl
., m m., dlMNv
g 000 NM..,v
~~~ r-.r-.r-.r-.
~
~
~
oo
I~l~
.g ~Saa
ii !!l-cnll.l
@ .e 8.5.~
...... GlID..Q.
E~lii.~i~~:!i
Gl a. :l c. g
u 2'~ r::: ii: J:::::i:
8..x C i' ~ 01:2
.~6~l-lijij
~1t:~~~!
S:~rt;t;i=i=
!
~
u
!
"-
>
/;
!!
D
5
888888888888888888888888888
~~~~g~~~:gg::~~:3~~~~~:~~~:
MlI)N_f"lV""COr-.COV_NOlIO__~lI)VCCJNNNMV""
888888888888888888888888888
ti~~~g~g~~gg:~g~~;~::::~~ti~~
_N __NNNN_ M_ VN__ ___
888888888888888888888888888
~N~~ci~o~r.icior.i~~..tNN..tr.i~NN..t~~~~
....Ul-_f"lf"lll)UlCOIOV_Nr-.v__~r-.MVNN_....~CO
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~181~1~~~~~~!l
:M~~~~~~3~~m~:~ ~~~ g~~~~:~
-O_NMOvco~~ovm....covcor-._N""lI)ON_NM
8ooooSggoo88~~~~~~~~22~~ggg
~
oo
. .
i ~~ iii
.. 1 ~~ ~~~m
o_-.u_u_ ~ "I ...
=_ J!~ ; ...~~~~
~m~ i~ ~~ ~~~~~511
~;-i "~:~ &o.~~] e.. e
~!:!:!- co _" E!'C) E QI ;: .2'-1; &. i. &.
~ -=....~ ~8~u~--
i~.i ~J:EN.~~8ffia!.333
E 'e (/)=(/)l!~=:l(/H' .B:a-'~::l!:~
...... ;:~"',~~~~~~lo~~~~
~~co.!:!;":l:l :> lSlS15
Ci ti Gl<;:Jol:)oo;(/) ~ ~~.:>],:g.:g,],],E E E
8gij~.g__.-~~ ~ ~~....
uluum~Ul-~~~~~~~~~OOO
Q m_
e! .i.g_
MS~'ii:j:a
_u_:l:lWC)
i"oi~:-;-
iiicz~-:~~~
"2J:~~~3~Q:
15:ldaa~!lii
'i..J:!J:!'iiaJ:
oi=I=t=i=o6.f
88888888888888
:~~ggg~g:~~:lIJ8:i
VlnlDCO..-lIJCOr-.lIJlD....... ....
88888888888888
~;i~ggg~g::~~~~
__N...._NNNN...._ M
88888888888888
~:~:2g:2:2:g~~~:!;i~
88888888888888
"'=f'i":oi~oici.o":f'i..tcioiGi
NMM..........,.....VIDMN...ID
...MIDr-.OlN....ONNmo..o
OOOOO_~NNMMv""lD
lIJCOCOll) COli) lIJa)lIJCOll) co COli)
"
<2
'lii~j~ __ oe
III 0_ _=:l'liiMl-
~5~.~ :!2~~"
.~~i7,:..jgiii~~ ~
.j.:'S!i~oi::!::l!:t:~t..i
~-:'~.::!:o::::~6;:2'~.a
.........C.....Gl.:;;Ol.- li
1_$.!!J:fitQ(Jl:.~5~.!'
1=i=i=;::~~~~..itOld:(I)~
8888888888
g~~~~~~~:8
_Mr-.lQfDCOfDCO....M
8888888888
g~i~g~~~~g
_N_NNNN _
8888888888
uia:icr:i":..t..t..t~~
_NCO""IDIQIOID...N
8888888888
":ci"':"':oa:ia:ia:ioiai
....NVMMMMf"l ...
8~gg~8~:!~~
__NNNNNNMM
~
a g
. u.~11
~~ je~Il2
al ~!.3"~~ _
ji_~i!S~:g5
~c%.gi!I~::~.?
ON~:J:ClxlliEw.~
~i::!@.~~.~ ~ E;-~
;;;J:g~~2:i!~~
:Q>O:lE..!iSS-"
~~m~~13i&5~
16 ~..
8888888888 888
g~~~~~g~:8~~~g~
Nf"l....VMVMM_..._Mf"lCl
88888888888888
oc..t..t~.oci<'ici.o.o..tciw
lIJ;:::!~~~C:O;::IOUJlJ)e~;:;;
88888888888888
ciGi.o":":..toa:i..t..t..two..t
NNM....MMNN__...NMW'>
be
""
88gggggggggggg
";":cioil'i..t..tcicicicioi":a:i
.-NMNNN_N_...__Mf"l
"
~
~
N_l"IlDCOCOONcoc:omOM....
ooooOO.........__NNN
mmmmmcnOl<nOlmmOlOl
1\
I
.
lii U E
~ ~
- ;" ~ 11 -
C) _ .. ....i: to >g~.
. iiE~ 'q .
2' a2~ .!'.. @ ~x
0<1; ti IIJ ~. a; ~ II) .. ....., g.
. c::: -:.... ~ -. lii .... Gl......
l::'!....liiEi:~~~ J:s:oo
"'~"2"2a'-a;o.!:!....~Sl_..
....u.. ",~~=Q.l.o:(/)l.o:lD.!!!:=
:g&~~~...&&&&&&;~
f~~~~~~3~~~~]5
':><-
~
~
W)
:::r-
~
-;-..
-<>
'C)
t-0
\\--
888
~=g
..~~
8888888888
~:gg~~:iggg
IPCONMCO..,.r-.NN....
888
cicio
_w",
NNN
8888888888
:~g28g~ggg
_N _N_N ...
888
-i";~
..m..
8888888888
~:ggg~~;ig~g
~~~
moo",
~~~
8888888888
~;:!~:;;~~:!:!re
Noom
~g:;:
-on.....,.OVlDCOCOV
~~~S':;:;::t;;~
i tii tii
~~;<
U~
~oo'"
. - -
o 0
;: 11 ;
U!
.!i.!i.!i
Q'i
:g?E;P
.. liS . _ u
j@~;:n ~
!!:!. .:;;; Go
!:!~~ii :!
;X:!:EE
o8io8~iLrQ.
Ill) ... N , Q..!! 1;; E 0.
......~E..e..ICa~E
~~~=&~~ 6.l
~~~,,~hid
....c....~_1iOll...
3:33.~;.~118~
J;J;<ZO('lNN3:a:N
2008 GRANT APPLICATION
16G4
PROJECT INITIATION AND COMPLETION FORM
(to be submitted with Site Improvement Grant Application)
I, fYl;?h~{ 'vtMtd(r {j--c..,,( , owner/tenant of the property located at
~S()CJ Lp.-t- ~T. "llt.p, ~ <; , have the funding and capability necessary to begin the
site improvements listed under Section 2 of the completed Sweat Equity Improvement Grant
application and have the ability to complete all improvements within ninety (90) days of the
approval of the improvement grant by the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency.
Signature of Tenant (ifleased)
Date
Signature of Tenant (ifleased)
(if jointly leased)
~e ~%AU
Signature of Owner
Date
~-q>6~
Date
Signature of Owner
(if jointly owned)
Date
Sweat Equity Improvement Grant FY2008 (revised 11912008)
8
2008 GRANT APPLICATION
16G4
Section 3: Project Cost Information
Estimated Project Cost:
. ALL WORK TO BE COMPLETED BY OWNER, FAMILY OR FRIENDS
. APPLICATION MUST HA VB AT LEAST WRITIEN ESTIMATES OR QUOTES
FOR MATERIALS ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION
Estimated Requested from CRA $_ 7-13. 4 ~. ):;,'f
Project materials must be a minimum of $500 and a maximnm of $1,000
COPIES OF ALL RECEIPTS AND/OR CANCELED CHECKS WILL BE REQUIRED UPON PROJECf
COMPLEfION AS PROOF TIlAT ALL MATERIALS FOR IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN PAID. NO
REIMBURSEMENT WILL BE MADE BY THE CRA UNTIL ALL RECEIPTS AND/OR CANCELED CHECKS
HAVE BEEN RECEIVED AND VERIFIED.
Section 4: Availability of Grant Funds
This grant program will be available for limited periods of the calendar year.
. Winter Program - October 1 st through December 30th
.
Summer Program - May 1 st through July 31 st
Jil1!u7-
ate
) d.-l 4--07
,
Date
.. r
s..'
[~~o/t>r
Sweat Equity Improvement Grant FY2008
6
MEMORANDUM
Date:
February 27, 2008
To:
David L. Jackson
Executive Director/CRA
2408 Lindwood Ave, Suite 7
Unit 11
Naples, Florida 34112
From:
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Agenda Item #16G5:
Site Improvement Grant Agreement
Attached, for your records, please find one certified copy as referenced
above (Agenda Item #16G5) approved by the Board of County
Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008.
The Minutes & Records Department has retained an original document for
the record.
If you should have any questions, please contact me at 774-8411.
Thank you,
Attachments
1665
OR-leI ",A.L'f 6 f'
::\. IC"M 1(,6 rjl q 5
rL~ llt>,l{)O'i{
~~
~
. ,-"
SITE IMPROVEMENT GRANT AGREEMENT
. .",<
'I' :1' ,.' after
'-;r1: (':l;::'i::,I:C,F'.T; ;'; :;;-,';ir-:'('T'
4. THE SITE IMPROVEMENT GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CRA
AND OWNER
This agreement is to be signed and witnessed AFTER eRA staff have found the Application to be complete.
THIS AGREEMENT ENTERED this 26 day of February. 2008 by and between the
Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency (hereinafter referred to as "CRA") and
Patrick Phelps (hereinafter referred to as "Owner").
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, in Collier County Ordinance No. 200Z-38, the Board of County
Commissioners delegated authority to the CRA to award and administer CRA grants including
contracts with owners for CRA grants; and
WHEREAS, Owner has applied for a site improvement grant in the amount of 2.586.54
dollars; and
WHEREAS, the CRA has determined that Owner meets the eligibility requirements and
was approved for a grant award in the amount of 2.586.54 dollars on February 26. 2008, ("CRA
Approval"), which is 33% of the costs to construct the site improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and
other valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:
I. Owner acknowledges to the CRA that Owner has received a copy of the Collier
County Community Site Improvement Grant Program (hereinafter referred to as "Grant
Program"), that Owner has read the Grant Program, and that Owner has had ample opportunity
to discuss the Grant Program with Owner's counselor advisor. Owner further acknowledges to
the CRA that Owner understands and agrees to abide by all of the terms and conditions of the
Grant Program. Owner agrees to the terms and conditions of the Grant Program.
2. Owner is the record owner of property described as 3043 CottaJl.e Grove Avenue. Naples.
Florida 341 12.
3. Owner has agreed to make certain improvements to the property pursuant to the
grant application submitted to the CRA dated January I I. 2008 attached hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated herein by reference.
4. Owner agrees to complete the construction of the Site Improvements within one (I) year
ofCRA Approval. Owner also agrees to fund at least 33% of the costs of the Site Improvements.
Owner is prohibited from paying contractors and/or vendors with cash; all payments for
S!:L' ;mnfO.ff;'Hij'}'li Gf';)(17
~,
f ,,;,~,
'1 f.: I~
! ""'" u
SITE IMPROVEMENT GRANT AGREEMENT
,., ;"{:'! <:,.,: '.: ;~._' " H.i'
"'if'
<~;;; ,: after i-;- :\ _',l.)~:f ':,n.:: .,-if')!;'-,-1:1' "~If r;
approved projects must be in the form of a personal check, cashier's check, money order or
credit card.
5. CRA has approved a grant to Owner in the amount of$2.586.54 to be
administered pursuant to the terms of this Agreement based on an estimated cost of $7,838.00.
If the actual costs are less than the estimated costs to construct the Site Improvements and less
than $8,000, the grant amount shall be reduced dollar for dollar in matching CRA funds as
determined by ratio of matching private funds required.
6. Unless prior disclosure is included in the grant application, no Owner, or any
immediate relative of Owner, shall serve as a contractor or subcontractor for the construction of
the Site Improvements and no Owner, or any immediate relative of Owner, shall receive
compensation for labor for the construction of the Site Improvements. An immediate relative of
Owner shall include mother, father, brother, sister, aunt, uncle and cousin or family member by
marriage to include mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law and sister-in-law. Owner has
verified that all contractors who have provided bids for the approved work are actively licensed
by Collier County and owner agrees that all labor will be performed only by the lowest bidding
contractor.
7. Owner agrees to obtain all necessary permits and submit any required plans to the
County's Community Development and Environmental Services Division. Upon completion of
the work, Owner shall submit to the CRA staff a project summary report, two (2) 8 x 10 after
photos, a list of materials and construction techniques used, a list of architects and/or contractors,
and any other information specific to the project or requested by the CRA staff. The CRA,
through its staff, shall confirm that the Site Improvements were constructed pursuant to the terms
of the application approved by the CRA.
8. Within forty-five (45) days after confirmation that the Site Improvements were
constructed pursuant to the terms of the approved application, Owner shall be issued a check in
the amount of the grant. However, if Owner fails to make the improvements pursuant to the
terms of the approved application, or if the project is not completed within one (1) year of CRA
approval, or if Owner fails to fund at least 33% of the cost of the Site Improvements, the grant
shall be deemed revoked and Owner shall be entitled to no funding.
9.
of Florida.
This Agreement shall be governed and construed pursuant to the laws of the State
10. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and their
representatives and agents, and incorporates all prior understandings, whether oral or written.
No change, modification or amendment, or any representation, promise or condition, or any
waiver, to this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized
officer of the party to be charged.
Site Improvement Grant .- I~gre€me\)t
2
1665
....
~
SITE IMPROVEMENT GRANT AGREEMENT
<' jf" :;-:,i: 'l is 'C' ~,I:i I ,i'1rj "l.W"
;llter -,~:3ft f'ol:: :j:_~)il!!:,n<H'! ,.C :i'i'lp,,~h
] ]. This Agreement is personal to Owner, and may not be assigned or transferred by
Owner or to Owner's respective heirs, personal representatives, successors or assigns without the
prior written consent of the CRA.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year
first written above.
OIJf'ci/J
By:
~'
(2) Witness Sign ::~
(iT
'!-J!A- b 12-0N F
Printed/Typed Name
By:
PrintedITyped Name
ATTEST:' "
"'(; .
DW19A.-fE~9CK, Clerk
", n .'. "YL_ r-J.' C
,". ...,~~~tL-
~t uto*';'Cferk
51~<,."'~'
, ':~' ..\..
COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
By: <U ~
DO' A 'ffA"tA,
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
Site Impro'/enHmt Gran~ !\grDement
3
16 F;
o i
BAYSHORE GATEW Y TRIA"NGLE
.~
,.r,<,~,:,-,g:::<"..... '
/. ',:\<tYi.i;~';,)J;'>,:-,:'"
I33I33EJ
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
APPLICATION I,
~
-:;' .'-~ ~',l~-' ir~i ~"-,-'~, I~\ r-\,r r-T'
03 I 2008
Patrick Phelps
3043 Cottage Grove Avenue
Naples, Florida 34112
.s,
.' )S..'
'-,';:Lc-<tl_;
l"'-::~'
16G~
J
APPLICATION FORM
1. THE SITE IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION
1-1 Applicant Information
1. Owner Name: Patrick Phelps
2. Owner Address:
2954 Cottage Grove Avenue
Naples, FL 34112
3. Site Address (if different from owner address):
3043 Cottage Grove Avenue
Naples, FL 34112
4. Folio Number and Legal Description of Site: 23370520006. Bayview Park Lot 17 OR 1995
5. Daytime Phone with area code: 2397755068
6. Alternate Phone with area code: 239 775 5048
7. E-mail Address:pphelps@isp.com
8. If you own this property, how long have you owned it? 2+ years
REQUIRED ATIACHEMENTS TO THIS PAGE FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
I. Property Appraiser's Identification Record.'
2. Aerial photograph of all parcels included in the grant. .
· These can be obtained from the Property Appraiser's website at hltlJ://www.collieralJlJraise...eom/.
9. If you lease this property, how long is lease term? (attach copy oflease)
10. Is this your first time to apply for a Site Improvement Grant? Yes G No D
11. If you have been awarded a Site Improvement Grant in the past, please list the date(s) and
award amounts for each grant you have received. Attach a separate page if necessary.
(OIllIlHTl'lal \pplil'.lllh 1I1lh pILI"{' ,In..." i. I Illllh IJ-IS
12, Tenant Name (Commercial Only):
13. Tenant Daytime Phone:
14. Tenant Alternate Phone:
15. Number of Years in Business at Site Address:
16. Occupational License Number:
17. Other Tenant Names, if any:
-;
UetaIls
Page 1 of1
16G5
Property Record
I:
Aerial
.~~
Sketches
, I
~
FoOo No.1 23370520006
Current Ownership
I Property AddressU 3043 COTTAGE GROVE AVE
~
Owner N
Addresses
PHELPS, PATRICK
2954 COTTAGE GROVE AVE
NAPLES
_ FL
Zip 34112 -7312
Legall BA YVIEW PARK LOT 17 OR 1995
PG 805
Section Townsh A""", Map No. Strap No.
23 50 25 0.16 5A23 182200 175A23
Sub No. 182200 BAYVIEW PARK
...~ Use Code 1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
2007 Final Certified Tax Roll
(Subject to Change)
Latest Sales History
If all Values shown below equal 0 this
parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll
Land Value $ 92,150.00 DaI8 Book. Page Amount
(+)Im Value $ 49,159.00 1112005 3930 -1680 $ 0.00
(=) Market Value $ 141,309.00 1011994 1995 -.B05 $ 40,000.00
H SOH Exempt Value $0.00 0311994 1927- 374 $ 25,500.00
(=) Assessed Value $ 141,309.00
(-) Homestead and other Exempt Value $0.00
(=) Taxable Value $ 141,309.00
SOH = -Save Our Homes. exempt value due to cap on assessment
inCI ~as8S.
m!I!II
The Information is Updated Weekly.
http://www.collierappraiser.comIRecordDetai1.asp?Map=&FolioID=OOOOO23370520006
1/7/2008
Print Map
Page 1 of1
1..6.G5
<<> 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Properly Appraiser is commiUed to providing the most accurate and up-tcH:Sate infonnation, nc
for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation.
http://maps.collierappraiser.comlwebmap/mapprint.aspx?title=&orient=LANDSCAPE&pap... 2/6/2008
..~
"~~~~'-~:'~
16G5
APPLICATION FORM
1-2 Project Information
I. Please describe the existing condition of each project for which you would like funding from
a Site Improvement Grant (attach additional sheets if necessary). Attllch two "Before" photos (8X10
color) to this page for each improvement you want to IfUJke.
Shingles are missing. Roof is 20+ years old.
2. Outline proposed improvements in detaiL Include one of the following for each project: A)
itemized work estimates from actively licensed contractors for work to be done by contractors or
B) material descriptions for work you intend to do yourself on supplier letterhead.
Replace shingles. Put on gauge metal roof. Install new gutters and down pipes.
3. List Materials to be used and construction methods to be utilized (i.e. red bricks will be
installed with traditional masonry methods, awnings will be hung, etc.) (attach additional sheets
if necessary). A1tIlch drawings or sketch of improvements to this page. Attllch color samples for each
improvement to this page.
Shingles. 26 gauge galvalume metal for roof. Wood for service door.
REQUIRED ATfACHEMENTS TO THIS PAGE FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
I. Two blO color photos of eacb project for the Site Improvement Grant.
2. Ifwork is beinl! done by contractors. TWO ESTIMATES from ACTIVELY LICENSED CONTRACTORS
WITH COLLIER COUNTY must be included for each job. Additionally, you must provide license information for
eacb contractor (information available at bUO:l/a00s2.collien!ov.net/webasms/visionlConCertldefault.asox call
contractor to verifY the name under which the license is registered!). Ifwork is beinl! done bv vourself, provide two
official rice otes for t funds do not cover a licant's labor .
..~
{C~:j~.k)
16G
APPLICATION FORM
1-3 Project Points
Directions: In the colwnn labeled "Work Included in Current Application", please indicate work
to be done as proposed in this application with a check mark (,f).
Po."
Projects Work Im."" i. eRA OFFICE
Cwnnt~
USE ONLY
Roof repairs ./ /{'
Removal of or repair 10 DOrches awninos ca'loDies, or cafJXlrts
Installation of or reoairto hurricane shutters
IMndow or door uDa'ade 10 hurricane standards
Exterior woodNork reoair """aoement or ~ inslalation
Stucco work or realacement sidinn
New or realacement roofl1o. rain cn:tter sYStem and soffit work V S
Paintino
Slonn water chinage . ments
Flfst-time aoolicant V Ol.
'r lctiwwav must showsions of damaae)
Installation of or reoair to ctivewav wlverls
Construction of or reolir to fencino I chainlink orohibiledl
Removal of trees for health, safety and weI13re benefits Omproved residential
Io1s onIv)
Removal of exotic veaelalion (tor' residential lots onlvl
Demolition of structures tor health, safety and welfare
Other projects approved by the CRA
7<7'
For office use ollly:
Total number .of pQints for this applK;ation is 2.')...
~ J~lf-)JJ6t(
/ S' tIIre ofCM staff Date
.~
-:J:.I
- .:.s'.'.,.-:.
;"'~~l;::-f
16G5
APPLICATION FORM
1-4 Verification of Resources to Undertake Project
~~ ~~~ ' owner/tenant of the property located at
o C A- " r1v E: , have the funding and capability necessary to begin the
site improvements listed under Section l-Z (page 2 of application) of the completed site
improvement grant application and have the ability to complete all improvements within one
year of the approval of the site improvement grant by the Collier County Community
Redevelopment Agency.
ercial only)
!)-- ~ - ;?d:J~
Date
Signature of Ownerffenant (Commercial only)
(if jointly owned or leased)
Date
Signature of Ownerffenant (Commercial only)
(if join or!
Date
Z--b --O~
Date
--~
.~"...,,~
"~'\~\"-'f
T........, ~"
16G5
APPLICATION FORM
1-5 Project Costs
Estimated Project Cost: $
-:; ~5 ~, 0 2)
,
,
ALL WORK TO BE COMPLETED BY A CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE AT LEAST
TWO (2) WRI'ITEN ESTIMATES OR QUOTES ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION.
Estimated amount requested from CRA $ ~ / <; g (p. s If
I
NOTE: Copies of all receipts and/or cancelled checks will reauired uoon proiect completion as
proof that all materials and contracted improvements have been oaid. No reimbursement will be
made bv the CRA until all receipts and/or cancelled checks have been received and verified.
FOR CRA USE ONLy
Total Estimated Project Cost: reg g ~,o '"
Request from CRA: -;l.fr-'iJb. s'f
3Oo~
Percentage of Total: !.!::.
:-I/-~J
Date
Owner Signature
CRAS~C?
Date
J./cr/o :t
Date
;)
16G5
1665
~,~'li>'!i<&
.::....;..:::.-tJ?-'R~ Sewiee. 1tte.
1755 J&C BOULEVARD' NAPLES. FLORIDA 34109
(239) 59B-2414 . FAX (239) 598-3745
L1C # CCCOSn79
S""""'9 ~ ad Lee ~ 600 zq 'feM4
"When You Want!t Done Ri hi"
www.kin rootio com
Name: Patrick Phelps
Phone: 775-5068
Date: 12119/07
Address: 3043 Cottage Grove Ave
Job Location: Same
City, Slate. Zip: Naples. FL 34112
Date Scheduled
Salesperson: William eKing
General Soecifications
1. At the end of each workday, the working area will be made watertight to protect building from normal weather conditions.
2. The work area will be magnetically swept to pick-up left over nails.
3. All gutters will be cleaned of debris.
4. All work to be performed by K.mg Rooting Service wlii meet or exceed Manutacturers specltlcatlons and Florida building
Code regulations.
Job Site Preparation
I. King Roofing Service will provide a container for the disposal of roofing materials. We will need to locate and prepare a
convenient place for the container.
2. King Roofing Service will have extra felt and tarps ready to cover any exposed areas ofthe roof deck in case of sudden
stonns.
3. King Roofing Service recommends that if you have any contents in your attic that you cover them with a tarp or plastic.
Deck Preparation
1. Remove I layer roofmg and felt and haul away debris to landfill.
2. After removal of roof, wood decking will be inspected for rot and or suspect wood.
3. Any rotted wood to be replaced at the rate of$63.00 per 4x8 sheet. Fascia at 58.00 per hr plus materials
4. Due to plywood overhang King will install 150 feet preussure treated I x2 to perimeter of home.
5. Wood included in estimate to replace existing rotted wood-48 feet Ix6, 64 ft 2x6, 3 sheets 4x8 plywood.
6. After wood repair is complete King roofing shall code nail entire plywood roof deck with 8d ring shank nails 6 inches on
center
Underlavment
Shingle ul,derla)im~l.t, which ;5 aboi,;omfi;unlj'i:.lie~ ftit j"):::.per, i~ ;.vuHabk fn '.:e':~':-'!""~: b,ades.
Underlayment options:
I. Install Tamko Tw secondary self adhered waterproofing underlayment per new code
Ventilation
As reauired bv the FHA. HUD and BOCA Buildin\! Codes. The National Roonn\! Contractors Association. and all Shin\!le
Mannfacturers. vour monn\! svstem will reauire the followin\! ventilation.
Options
I. Install AR V exhaust vent as needed. Paint to match roofing.
2. Install 2 4ft off ridge vents to improve ventilation
Flashinl!S
I. Reuse flashings to sidewalls and chimneys as applicable.
2. Install new 26 gauge 2 'I, inch painted galvalume drip edge to perimeter of home.
3. Install new epdm soil stack boots to all protrusions as needed. Paint to match roofing
Cont page 2
GBD -.Shgl-form
U:Y\V\J "bJok ~
11; 0 0 ~~;t(r}
1665
www.kingroofing.com
~~
--.-,.,""___.___~~..!k_
17SS}&C BOUlEVARD' NAPlES. flOlUDA 34109
(21'J) S'J8-2414' fAX (l3'J) 598-J745
UC~CC;::QiZlli:
Name: Patrick Phelps
Phone: 775-5068
Date: 12/19107
Address: 3043 Cottage Grove Ave
Job Location: Same
City, State, Zip: Naples, FL 34112
Date Scheduled
Salesperson: William eKing
OPTIONS:
Shingle Color _
Eave Co/or__~_"~__
Flat Roof Color
5 V crimp 26 Gauge Gall'u[umc
Mil! finish
~ EPDM Soil Stack Boots Painted to match Shingle Color
if Vented Ridge or ORV's
if Painted Drip Edge Metai
if Tamko Tw underlayment
if Code nail 0.( plywood ro(?fdeck
if Vented with 4 ji ojlridge vents
./ 10 Year Tran~rerable
Labor Warranty
Total Contraet Amount.
57,838.00 .
-----
Approved Inti
/'
GUiiers ( included)
/
..---~ ,/
t Remove _ e.xisting e;utters and hat!t away debris ,. " . . ",--"--
2. Install new 6 inch-aluminum K style gutter-appro;::: 82 feet on right ana lelt sidt: c(ivec<Jges
3. Install3x4 commercial size downspouts
Total Gutters-
Any rotted wood to be replaced at the rate of$63.00 per 4x8 sheet. Fascia at 58.00 per hr plus materials
· Please note additional layers of felt will be removed for additional .05 per sq ft per layer.
Included: All permits, disposal, taxes, insurance and inspections. All employees are covered under our workers compensation
insurance. "i /,::; dn no! use subs or e:-,:er,wi' insunlllcr. llolicies. We are Proud to be a "Drug Free Workplace". Please check our
references and our archive of jobs, we will provide as many as you like.
Payment Terms: $ Deposit (1/3 down,II3 upon dry in and ~"c.
balance due upon full completion
Accepted By: Date: (For company use only)
This contract Accepted
by: Dale
All contracts are subject to review by the home office and may be terminated at anytime prior to start date. Contracts to be approved by a duly authorized representative.
NOTE: This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within 15 days.
L-OnrraC10r L-ertIttcahon Uetail Page
Page 1 of2
1665
--
COlli~rO~D?lJ!lty
Contractor Details
Class Code: 1310
Class Description: ROOFING CONTR.-CERTIFIED
Certification Number: 16483
Original Issue Date: 7/18/1995
Certification Status: ACTIVE
Expiration Date: 8131/2008
County Comp Card:
State Number: CCC 057279
State Expiration Date: 8131/2008
Doing Business As: KING ROOFING SERVICE, INC.
Mailing Address: 1755 J & C BLVD
NAPLES, FL 34109
Phone: (239)598-2414
Fax: (239)598-3745
Back
http://apps2.colliergov .nettwebappslvisionlConCertlDetail.aspx?cert= 16483 1/22/2008
+1
16r.'t;
~ e~
\ Lullflj! 1\-1,lrc,s: P_I. \ Ik ~:, iBIS
:--';"1'1,.,. 1-"L .HIO J
DATE: 12120104
7- [so 0 ~
( t,'l{) )L::-~)f--t~s
" , :)\
l~cc /'Z.K.t-f,,!..ot~
v
()Iti(c Lo"uiOll: 2101 J&(: i'>h-,J.
"lapb. FL .\410<)
Phone: (239) 597-9007
Fa,,, (239) 598-4468
To:
Pat Phelps
3043 Cottage Grove Ave.
Naples. FL 341 12
lOB NAME/LOCATIOI
PHON!;; (239)775-5068
lOB NUt1BER: PhelpsOI.KH
WE HEREBY SUBMIT SPECIFICATION AND ESTIMATES FOR:
Remove existing shingle roof. Haul away all roofing debris. Taxes. insurance, and permits are included in the base price.
5- V METAL ROOF
I. Install self adhering secondary water barrier direct to roof deck.
2. Install 26 gauge galvalume metal eave drip.
3. Install 26 gauge galvalume metal flashing and counter flashing.
4. Install 40' of cobra vent at ridge.
5. Install 26 gauge galvalume metal roof panels mill finish.
6. Install 26 gauge galvalume hip and ridge metal.
7. Fasteners to be screws.
8. Replacement of rotted wood shall be based on time and material in addition to the base pro-
posal amount. $55.00 per man hour plus 25% above cost of materials.
9. Issue a 20 year manufactures warranty.
10. Issue a 5 year Gulf Coast Roofing warranty.
If either party to this contract fails to perform its duties under the contract, the prevailing party in any such dispute shall be entitled
to recover its costs and attorney fees from the non prevailing party.
WE PROPOSE hereby to furnish material and labor-complete in accordance with the above sDecifications for the sum of.
Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars
$7,800.00
Payment to be made as follows:
25% Deposit upon signing of contract, additional 40% on removal of roofing material, dry-in, metal delivery.
Balance due upon completion.
Authorized Signature
All m..teriaJ I~ g....r..Ht~ to bE" II~ SJI"!'<ffit."d. All work to be .:o.nplet<!-d hi ;> profes~iOflIlI
Ill"'"""r ",ccon::!lR& to Sb.Rd",rd pr"ctke~. Aoy ;dter..tions or devi..tio.. from .wOY" sp...:tfic;>tiOftS
'nvohring exu-.. co~ts willlw ex(<cut<!-d only Upo.l wnfte-n orde-rs, IInd wiG b...:ome- 1111 e-xt.... dlll..g<<
_e..- ...nd IIb.ov.. fl... e..tin,...t<>. AU "'1:"-_"",,,(0< "....ti"!;....t u\><>'" ..trik..~. "",,,,dent.. Of .....,..y.. bc<yo"d
our control. Owne.. to "oIlT'f"lir... tomlldo, ..nd oth.... ne"....s'..1' ins"rance. Our work"r.;;ut' fully
Cov",r'!'d by Workers Compe-nsation h""unc...
Acceptance of proposal:
The above prices. ~pecjflcatjons and conditions are satisfact:ory and are
Hereby accepted. You are authori:::ed to do the work as specified
Payment will be made as outlined above.
Date of Acceptance:
Signature:_
Signature:
Contractor CertIticatIon Detail Page
16Plrs of2
Collier Count\;
-FLORIDA -- ~
Contractor Details
Class Code: 1310
Class Description: ROOFING CONTR.-CERTIFIED
Certification Number: 22726
Original Issue Date: 8/24/2001
Certification Status: ACTIVE
Expiration Date: 8/31/2008
County COl11p Card:
State Number: CCC 058172
State Expiration Date: 8/31/2008
Doing Business As: GULF COAST ROOFING CO.,
INe.
Mailing Address: P.O. BOX 7818
NAPLES, FL 34101-
Phone: (239)597-9007
Fax: (239)598-4468
Baek
http://apps2.colliergov.net/webapps/vision/ConCert/Detail.aspx?eert=22726
1/22/2008
'\" "( -=- \,\"'t..,
Jropusal
?eain eollteot oIttlHnillltlJl
3813 Arnold Avenue
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 643-5322 . Fax (239) 643-5893
www.ralnconlrolaluminum.c;om
Pose No.
_.16 bpJs
~
P.'\\ N'.
Sv~
(1wt~ fb',J~H"'Sl
I li I
,as~ . '\ o\L0- II
.--
-oC:
-()
'S;l,. "\""\5-1-\~5b 13'9 j
P'ROflOSAl SU8Mrrrllc TO PHONE
~"'~ Q"R\Q< "\'<j5-5:,/;,8, ~'b?:DD
l-~n ~Q~~ I
.,-, "3' - ~~ "G '-ve 'i "~,M\?,,6A
"'0"'\' c.... \. \. "'" \J<> ,",,'.. . fJJ'7 j ..,
CITY. STATE AAO liP CODE" ~ Joe LOCATION . .
IV An\",.; ~\ '2,'"\\\';l. \3" ~"'""\_.,, c;(,,(\<._
ARCHITECT I DATE OF .....NS '\ I '0& ""ONE ..,
W. hereby tlubmit specifications and t1liotlmate$)~r: ~
f " ~eW\~v..... c>\~ c..~q.,~ ,_~,~ S"~~\\I CI:":~ ~~'~';"o.\\
\&l 5"'''''''''\.5$ ~\"""~"b"'" 6-,...,,,,,,,,, ..."c!l ~J(~ C>.\"'........a... I2.::'_"-'"~_-'''
,",0 \...~ S;, ~'n....t ~~.~ <-I.~ ~.r:-.~~.. "
=
X=:. Oct\.H p..,) S ~t"".~1i\ .
CO\tttl ~('_l-..\.t ~
A. x:
)( f"~(
Ilx;.'t
)( ,"" C
NOTICE OF INYENTION TO FILE LIEN: You are hereby notified that seller Intends to file a lien in connection with this
matelial and installation unless this invoice is paid as $taled.
JIIr tIraplllll' hereby 10 furnish material and labor - complel& in accordance with above specifications.. for the SUm of'
c::" ~
dollars ($ J <:> <> ,
=1
Payrnent to be made OIIlio tollows ~
)
\.)~_AJ r- ........'('\~'"i.~"".u
AI n~ i:;. OUW"AIllead 10 bu ~~ $QOdtkrd. All WGI'It IQ b. COtrIplftIlId in il. WOlkmardikel IJIWftltlPt IlllWflllnlJ
ta ~iItG~. MJ OlIICItAUohotdlaYi~onfromGllG'd~. kl~kMg9Xlr~OO6l'w11 btrwll'
oMDd_1IptlIlWl'ilwtllfdcn,andwlll"-omQMw8cl)wyvOV'Ol'WIIIlcMIbCOCiMmllt.A118glWllllUI'$I
~1tUp:ln~~IlllOt~iDyandQW~.OwnerIl)GMryllio.lOm8dDand"~1ltY
NuI61q, ~ workGl'i 1ft fully cmnd ~ WutkRlun'ii OoIlP,"*11ian lnIuranclit. ... PiIlII duo lWnIS WIll
btI.- 1....por mOlleh iIPlI in cneQ\o'lillllh;:; ~t b rllf.l'I'etd ICI M .lUOMIly kif coIocClOO,lh& Cu.lunlllr
~ sh;)I:lIl1clkt'''~pQfl:ibltIotBltQ;lUffCo:;t;Uf\dlllktrnW)'~_
, . .
Nttptanrt uf Ifrnpullul- The allov. price.. specific,ban.
iJnd condition:; are satisfactory It,d CI!'e hereb~ accepted. You art: i2uthorized
to do the work iJl; SlJIecltled. P'dyment will be made as outlil'ltd above.
Date of Aceuptance:
'-
Authoriz'd ~ SJ, \" .
Sle;oature
Note: ~\. propa$lll may b~
withdri'Wn by us if' ~7~C(:ptOd with7:'
~.~-_.~--
-"'-
310
days.
.b
"
Signature
._~---
SigrnUurs
H31 H3 38'<1d
Wflllt lOellNm Nlllel
,,/'
E689EP95E1:
IE:E8 8081:/P1:/18
16/
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MISCELLANEOUS CORESPOPNDENCE
February 26, 2008
1. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS DIRECTED:
A. Minutes:
1) Bavshore/Gatewav Triangle Local Redevelop Advisorv Board:
Agenda of November 6,2007; December 4,2007; January 8, 2008.
Minutes of November 6,2007; December 4,2007; January 8, 2008.
2) Collier Countv Citizens Corps:
Agenda of December 19, 2007.
Minutes of December 19,2007.
3) Collier Countv Code Enforcement Board - Form 1:
Minutes of November 29, 2007.
4) Collier Countv Planning Commission - Form I:
Agenda of February 7, 2008.
Minutes of November 28,2007; December 6,2007.
5) Development Services Advisorv Committee:
Minutes of January 9, 2008.
6) Emergencv Medical Services Advisorv Council:
Minutes of December 19, 2007; January 17,2008.
7) Environmental Advisorv Council:
Agenda of January 7,2008.
8) Fire Review Task Force:
Minutes of October 30, 2007; November 30,2007; December 14,
2007; January 18,2008; February 1,2008.
9) Forest Lakes Roadwav and Drainage Advisorv Committee:
Agenda of December 12, 2007; January 9,2008.
Minutes of November 14, 2007; December 12, 2007.
10) Golden Gate Communi tv Center Advisorv Committee:
Minutes of January 7,2008.
11) lmmokalee Master Plan and Visioning Committee:
Minutes of October 17, 2007.
.
.
,
161
12) Isle of Capri Fire Control District Advisory Committee:
Agenda of January 3, 2008.
Minutes of January 3, 2008.
13) Land Acquisition Advisory Committee:
Agenda of February 11, 2008.
14) Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee:
Agenda of December 20,2007; January 17,2008.
Minutes of November 15, 2007; December 20, 2007.
15) Library Advisory Board:
Agenda of January 23, 2008.
Minutes of December 12,2007.
16) Pelican Bay Services Division Board:
Minutes of February 6, 2008.
17) Public Vehicle Advisory Committee:
Agenda of February 4, 2008.
18) Radio Road Beautification Advisory Committee:
Agenda of December 18, 2007; January 15,2008.
Minutes of November 20,2007; December 18, 2007.
19) Utility Authority - Form 1:
Minutes of June 25, 2007.
20) Vanderbilt Beach Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee:
Agenda of December 6,2007; January 3,2008.
Minutes of November 1, 2007; December 6,2007.
B. Other:
1) Hearing of the Collier County Special Magistrate:
Minutes of January 4,2008; January 18, 2008.
2) Clam Bay Committee:
Minutes of December 19, 2007.
f>''''''. f. 'il
TilE BAYSIIORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLl6JEV~'LO~ENT AGE~ECEIVED
COM M U NIT y RED EVE LOP MEN T .\ G E N C Y JAN 1 8 2008
2740 8."-YSflORF. DRIVE, lINIT J7 "JAPLES, FL. J4Ll2 PHOT\JE 239.6H.llH FAX 239.775.4456
;'::...8,::i t County Commissioners
BA YSHORE/GA TEW A Y TRIANGLE LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD
Tuesday November 6,2007,6:00 p.m.
2740 Bayshore Drive Unit 10, Naples FL 34112
Al!enda
I. RollCall
Fiala 'Qr____
Halas ~." ;JA".J-.---
Henning J:L:-G'---
Coyle.. ._ u::f::.-_.
Coletta_ _~__.._
2. Adoption of Agcnda
3. Adoption of Minutcs: Rcgular Mccting Octobcr 2, 2007.
4. Exccutivc Director:
a. Projcct Updates
5. Old Business:
a. Davis Blvd Strcct Lighting Projcct
b. Discussion - January 29, 2008 Bonding Rcfcrendum
c. Discussion - Advisory Board Standing Rules of Opcration
6. New Business:
a. Request for Pa}mcnt - Public Financial Managcmcnt
b. Discussion - Sidewalk Requiremcnts on Linda Drivc
c. Discussion - Creating a CRA 501 c3
d. Discussion - Capital Improvement Plan
7. Citizcn Commcnts
8. Adjournment
Note I: All CRA Advisory Board meetings are held in the Bayshore Gateway Meeting Room, 2740
Bayshore Drive, Unit 10.
Note 2: All meetings are publicly noticed in the Harmon Turner Building (Administration
Building), County web site: www.colliergov.net and on the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA web
site: wwwcolliercra.com All meetings are held at the CRA Office Meeting Room. Please call the
Bayshore/Gateway Triangle office at (239) 643-1115 if you have any questions about the meeting.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this
proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact
David Jackson, 2740 Bayshore Drive, Unit 17, Naples, Florida, 34112, (239) 643-1115.
Mise ComlS: I V I A I
Date:
Item#:
:::c~ies to:
/
16 , A 1
THE BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
2740 BAYSHORE DRIVE IINIT 17 NAPLES, FL 34112 PI-lONE 239.643.111.; I'AX 239.775.4456
BAYSHORElGATEWAY TRIANGLE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LOCAL ADVISORY BOARD
MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 6, 2007 MEETING
The meeting of the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Advisory Board
was called to order by Chairman Mr. Lindsey Thomas at 6:00 p.m. at the CRA Office Meeting
Room 2740 Bayshore Drive Unit 10.
1. Roll Call: Present: Advisory Board Members: Lindsey Thomas, Chuck Gunther, Steve
Main, Bruce Preble, Maurice Gutierrez, and Jill Barry. Excused Absence: Bill Mears,
Ron Fowle and Karen Beatty.
CRA Staff Present: David Jackson, Executive Director, Jean Jourdan Project Manager
and Sue Trone Operations Analyst.
County Staff Present: Ma~orie Student-Stirling, Assistant County Attorney, and Bob
Tipton and John Miller from the County Transportation Division.
2. Adoption of Aaenda: Chairman Thomas asked if there were any additions or
corrections to the published agenda, hearing none Mr. Thomas asked for a motion to
approve the agenda: Motion: Mr. Preble. Second: Mr. Gutierrez. Approved 6-0.
3. Adoption of Minutes: Chairman Thomas asked for a motion to approve the October 2,
2007 regular Meeting Minutes: Motion Mr. Main. Second Mr. Preble. Approved 6-0.
4. Executive Director's Report:
a. Project Updates:
i. Mr. Jackson directed the Board's attention to the Board Packet memo
detailing CRA projects updates.
ii. Ms Trone Advised the Board of progress on updating the CRA's website
and first edition of the CRA printed newsletter.
5. Old Business:
a. Davis Blvd Street Liahtina Proiect. Mr. Jackson gave a summary of the Davis
Blvd Street Lighting Project and introduced Mr. Bob Tipton and Mr. John Miller
from the County Transportation Division to discuss CRA financial participation in
the project. Mr. Tipton briefed the Board on the status of the project, and pointed
out that if the CRA was going to pay for the decorative light poles instead of the
standard FOOT poles, the cost would be $345,433.50, and that the total project
was bid higher than the amount of the FOOT grant for standard lighting by
$302.013.49. Mr. Jackson stated that the CRA has budgeted for the decorative
poles since 2004 and has increase the amount each year to meet expected cost
increases. For the FY08 budget, $200,000 was set aside. He also stated that the
Advisory Board had several options to weigh: do a budget amendment for
$145,433 to meet the increased cost for decorative light poles or not pay for the
decorative poles and not expend the money. He reminded the Board that no
matter which option they recommend, the project will still be short $301,013.49,
and the Transportation Division has asked the Board to consider a contribution
of that amount in addition to the poles. Mr. Jackson advised the Board that there
was sufficient funds in reserves to contribute the additional funds to cover the
shortfall, or maybe consider loaning the amount to the County, to be repaid next
November 6 2007 eRA-AB Minutes
16 I f.~ 'If
~
fiscal year. These options should be considered to prevent the project from
being delayed another year. After a roundtable discussion on the project and the
funding options for the poles and total project, the Board came to consensus
that they desired to have the project completed this year. Motion by Mr. Gunther
to not fund the cost of the decorative poles and offer to loan the $301,013.49 to
the County to be repaid out of their FY09 budget. Second: Ms Barry. In
discussion, Russell Rosen in the audience asked about solar lighting. Mr. Tipton
stated that research indicates that they don't work well in Florida. Mr. Gunther
asked why they lights weren't being put in the median at a cost savings. Mr.
Tipton said that FOOT would not allow it. The motion failed to pass 2-4; Gunther
and Barry for; Main. Preble, Thomas. Gutierrez against. Mr. Main stated that he
felt that an offer of a loan to the County would not be well received. He felt that
since the CRA had already budgeted the $200.000 for expenditure for this
project that they gift the $200,000 towards the project and have the County
make up the difference. Mr. Main asked Mr. Tipton where the extra $100,000
would come from. He said that it would have to come out of the Divisions
contingency fund or another project. Motion by Mr. Preble to not pay for
decorative light poles, contribute the CRA's $200,000 towards the project under
the condition that the project is completed this year and the County makes up
the difference. Second: Mr. Gutierrez. Approved 6-0. Mr. Jackson told Mr. Tipton
that he would get a memorandum to him stating the Advisory Board's
recommendation and a CRA Agenda Executive Summary with a draft budget
amendment to take to the BCC.
b. January 29, 2008 BondinQ Referendum. Mr. Jackson detailed the activities to
date conceming the CRA's task to research the requirements for a bonding
referendum and draft referendum language for the ballot. He recommended that
the CRA wait until the Florida Supreme Court publishes its findings which would
not be until the end of January 2008 to see if the CRA had to do a referendum.
He also stated that with the holidays, short timeframe until the voting date and
the significant public awareness campaign required to educate the public, the
vote may fail. Mr. Jackson recommended that the CRA wait until the November
Presidential election. Mr. Thomas stated that he felt that there was no downside
to taking the referendum to a January vote. Even if it fails, the CRA can try again
in November. Ms Barry said that Conservation Collier program was passed by
the public. Mr. Main said that Conservation Collier was for the whole county and
a different type of issue, and that this might be seen as a tax issue or tax
increase. He felt that the CRA would need a tremendous marketing campaign
and there isn't time to do it. The CRA should not risk failure in January. Motion
to recommend to the CRA to not put the referendum on the January 29, 2008
ballot: Mr. Main. Second: Mr. Gunther. Approved 5-1; Mr. Thomas against.
c. Advisory Board Standing Rules of Operation. Mr. Thomas stated that since Mr.
Mears was not present and that this was coming from his subcommittee, he
recommended that the Board table the issue until the next meeting. Motion by
Mr. Main to table. Second: Mr. Gutierrez. Approve 6-0.
6. New Business:
a. Request for Pavment - Public Financial ManaQement (PFM). Mr. Jackson
discussed the invoice from PFM that included work leading up to the CRA RFP
for a $9,000,000 line of credit in the amount of $7.428.00. Motion to pay: Mr.
Gunther. Second: Ms Barry. Approved 6-0.
b. Discussion - Sidewalk Requirements on Linda Drive. Mr. Jackson explained the
background on the sidewalk issue identified by the County Zoning Department
November 6 2007 eRA-AS Minutes
2
161A 1
and the developer, Mr. Rosen. Mr. Jackson introduced Mr. Michael Clough, P.E.
for the developer and Mr. Rosen who were in attendance to speak to the topic.
Mr. Clough stated that the SDP for the street required a sidewalk the length of
the development on the north side of the street. The developer has an option to
not install the sidewalk and make a "payment in lieu of' to the County. He also
stated that the LDC required a seven foot wide sidewalk and that it would be
difficult to install. Also there are two existing homes that would require a costly
modification to retrofit in a sidewalk over their lots. Mr. Jackson asked if the
developer would consider meandering the sidewalk towards the edge of the
street at those lots to minimize the impact and cost. After discussion a motion for
the staff to support the developer's request to install a four-foot sidewalk and
meander it at the two developed lots: Mr. Gunther. Second: Mr. Gutierrez.
Approved 6-0.
c. Discussion - Creatina a CRA 501 c3. Mr. Jackson asked for the Board to
consider the creation of one or more non-profit entities that would support the
goals and objectives of the CRA Master Redevelopment Plan. The Board
members expressed that they were unsure of the requirements or legal authority
to do so, and ask Mr. Jackson to retum with more information.
d. Discussion - Capital Improvement Plan. Mr. Thomas recommended that the
item be tabled until Mr. Mears retumed. Motion to table until the next meeting
Ms Barry. Second: Mr. Gutierrez. Approved 6-0.
7. Citizen Comments. Mr. Thomas asked if there were any comments from the audience.
There were none.
8. Adioumment: The regular meeting was adjoumed at 7:47 pm.
y Lindsey Thomas, CRA-AB Chairman.
App
November 6 2007 eRA-AS Minutes
3
THE BAYSHORE/GATEWAY
RECEIVED
AGENCY
COM M U NIT Y RED EVE LOP MEN TAG ENe Y JAN 1 8 2008
T R I A NG LJ~QJ;~E 1.01 ENT
2740 BAYSHORE DRIVE, {INI'f 17 N_>\.'LES, FL 34112 IllIONE 239.643.1115 F:\x 2J9.775.4ffiB~rdofcountyCommissloners
BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD
Tuesday December 4, 2007, 6:00 p.m.
2740 Bayshore Drive Unit 10, Naples FL 34112
Al!enda
1. RollCall
Fiala
Halas
Henning
Coyle
'::oletta
2. Adoption of Agenda
3. Adoption of Minutes: Regular Meeting November 6, 2007.
4. Prcsentations:
a. Cultural Nceds Assessmcnt ~ Arthur Grecnburg, AMS Planning & Research
b. South Bayshore Drive Improvement Proposal ~ Bill Neal, MSTU Chairman
c. Community Alliance of Bayshore (CAB) - William Baycs, CAB Secrctary
5. Executivc Director:
a. Projcct Updates
6. Old Business:
a. Discussion - Advisory Board Standing Rulcs of Opcration
b. Discussion - Capitallmprovcmcnt Plan
7. Ncw Business:
a. Bayshore Cultural Arts (BCA) Evcnt Support Requcst - Sondra Quinn, BCA President
b. Sweat Equity Grant Approval (Residcntial - John Hotz) - Tronc
c. Site Improvement Grant Approval (Commercial - Seyler & Rcsidcntial - Pallis) - Trone
d. Approve Attcndance at Housing Conference - Tronc
c. January 2008 CRA-AB Meeting Datc Change to January 8, 2008
f. Noticc of January CRA-AB Election of Officers for 2008
8. Citizcn Commcnts
9. Adjournment
Note I: All CRA Advisory Board meetings are held in the Bayshore Gateway Meeting Room, 2740
Bayshore Drive, Unit 10.
Note 2: All meetings are publicly noticed in the Harmon Turner Building (Administration
Building), County web site: www.colliergov.net and on the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA web
site: www.colliercra.com. All meetings are held at the CRA Office Meeting Room. Please call the
Bayshore/Gateway Triangle office at (239) 643-1 ] ] 5 if you have any questions about the meeting.
]f you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this
proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact
David Jackson, 2740 Bayshore Drive, Unit ]7, Naples, Florida, 34] ]2, (239) 643-]] ]5.
Misc. Corres ll.o \ ft \
Date
Item#:
COPies to:
J
TilE BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE
'1'~}lA .,
RED' E ~ E LOP M ~ T AGENCY
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
2740 B,,,"YSHORE DRIYE Ur.;IT 17 NAPLES, FL 34112 PIIONE 239.643.1115 FAX 239.775.4456
BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LOCAL ADVISORY BOARD
MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 4, 2007 MEETING
The meeting of the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Advisory Board
was called to order by Chairman Mr. Lindsey Thomas at 6:00 p.m. at the CRA Office Meeting
Room 2740 Bayshore Drive. Unit 10.
1. Roll Call: Present: Advisory Board Members: Lindsey Thomas, Chuck Gunther, Steve
Main, Bill Mears, Ron Fowle. Karen Beatty, Maurice Gutierrez. and Jill Barry. Absent:
Bruce Preble.
CRA Staff Present: David Jackson. Executive Director, Jean Jourdan Project Manager
and Sue Trone Operations Analyst
County Staff Present: Marjorie Student-Stirling, Assistant County Attorney.
2. Adoption of Aaenda: Chairman Thomas asked if there were any additions or
corrections to the published agenda, Ms Trone asked that Site Improvement Grant for
Ms Francis Pallis be considered in New Business. Mr. Thomas asked for a motion to
approve the agenda as amended: Motion: Mr. Mears. Second: Mr. Main. Approved 8-0.
3. Adoption of Minutes: Chairman Thomas asked for a motion to approve the November 6,
2007 regular Meeting Minutes: Motion Ms Barry. Second Mr. Gutierrez. Approved 8-0.
4. Presentations:
a. Cultural Needs Assessment Mr. Jackson introduced Mr. Arthur Greenberg
representing AMS Planning & Research. Inc., the company contracted to
perform the local cultural needs assessment for the CRA. Mr. Greenberg gave
an overview of the mission of AMS Planning & Research. He outlined the scope
of work that AMS was contracted to perform, and detailed what the potential
outcomes could be. He summarized the preliminary results of the day-long
interviews he had just conducted and added that he would be launching an
internet-base survey also for the leadership of Collier County cultural facilities
and organizations to fill out Mr. Greenberg summarized that he should be able
to complete his report in February 2008. Mr. Gunther asked if Mr. Greenberg
had been to the County Historical Museum or been around Collier County. Mr.
Greenberg outlined his personal work in 2004 when he condLlcted the Collier
County United Arts Council (UAC) county-wide cultural needs assessment Mr.
Thomas thanked Mr. Greenberg for the informative update and that the Advisory
Board would be looking forward to his report in February 2008.
b. South Bayshore Drive Improvement Proposal. Mr. Jackson summarized_the
information in the Board's meeting packet and the recent meeting he had with
Mr. Bill Neal. Chairman of the Bayshore Beautification MLlnicipal Services
Taxing Unit (MSTU). about potential partnership with the MSTU to improve
Bayshore Drive south of Thomasson Drive. Mr. Jackson listed the possible steps
that would have to take place and the need for a formal agreement between the
CRA & MSTU to proceed with the project. He introduced Mr. Bill Neal. Mr. Neal
stated that the MSTU continues to improve Bayshore Drive, and are currently
replacing Buttonwood Trees with new palms and have an agreement with a strip
mall owner to install some new vegetation near his facility. Mr. Neal said that the
December 4 2007 CRA-AB Minutes
~!
161~. 1
MSTU initially had only enough money to improve Bayshore Drive to
Thomasson Drive, and now foresee having the funds to continue farther south.
He stated that Mr Jackson's summary accurately detailed his conversation and
appears to be the best way to approach the task, if the CRA desires to partner
with the MSTU. He asked that if the Advisory Board had interest that Mr.
Jackson attend the next MSTU meeting on December 12, 2007 to discuss
options with the MSTU Board and staff Mr. Thomas asked how much money
does the MSTU have earmarked for the project? Mr. Neal stated that they have
approximately $1.8M ready for the project and receives $800-900K per year in
annual revenues. He said that is the CRA joins in on the initial study that the
MSTU would most likely put up the majority of the construction funds, and that
the MSTU could start right away. Mr. Gunther asked if the developers of Sabal
Bay (the Colliers) had been contacted or approached to be a part of the project?
Mr. Neal said, no not directly, and he felt the first step was to get a design or
plan on paper so the MSTU and CRA could show them what they would be
'buying in to'. Motion by Mr. Mears to join in with the MSTU 50%-50% for the
cost of the study to be followed by further approval for engineering-design
contracts, and for the CRA Executive Director to attend the MSTU meeting to
discuss the project and agreement. Second Ms Beatty. Approved 8-0.
c. Community Alliance of Bavshore (CAB). Mr. Jackson gave a summary of how a
subcommittee was appointed by the CRA-AB to do some grassroots visioning
and public outreach to the residents, property owners and business operators
within the CRA boundary and report back to the CRA-AB with suggestions and
recommendations. He introduced Ms Sondra Quinn to present those
recommendations, and that she was standing in for Mr. William Bayes. Ms
Quinn thanked the CRA-AB for the time to present the group's findings and
recommendations. Ms Quinn covered the strategic framework that the group
had developed and reviewed the material in the Board's meeting packets -
Organizational Structure, Board Responsibilities. Committee Job Descriptions,
and Goals & Objectives. She also mentioned that the group started out with the
name Bayshore Community Alliance (BCA), however the acronym was
confusing with Bayshore Cultural Arts (BCA), so the name was changed to
Community Alliance of Bayshore (CAB). Recently there was some discussion
about expanding the name to be broader to reflect a greater influence on the
region - Naples Bay Corridor Alliance (NBCA). Mr. Thomas congratulated Ms
Quinn on the group's progress. Ms Barry asked if the group had a desire to
operate under the CRA structure but segregate dues, donations and funds? Ms
Student-Stirling, Assistant COLlnty Attorney explained that the group could
become a subcommittee under the CRA, but that it could not be private (501c3)
and be a part of the CRA or government.
5. Executive Director's Report:
a. Proiect Updates. Mr. Jackson gave a short powerpoint presentation of activities
within the CRA as an update to the Board.
6. Old Business:
a. Advisory Board Standino Rules of Operation. Mr. Jackson gave a summary of
the sequence of events concerning this topic. Motion by Ms Beatty to approve
the staff's submission of standing rules. Second: Ms Barry. In discussion Mr.
Mears stated that the intent of the standing rules, as adopted in the updated by-
laws. was that the rules would be for the Advisory Board, not the staff - as they
are currently written. Mr. Jackson stated that he misunderstood the direction or
the intent of the Board and that his submission was written with the staff in mind.
December 4 2007 CRAMAB Minutes
2
,,':" ~ A
161
1
Mr. Mears recommended that this item not be approved and that the original By-
Laws Subcommittee reconvene to draft the standing rules. Ms Barry withdrew
her second and Ms Beatty withdrew her motion.
b. Capital Improvement Plan. Mr. Jackson stated that he did not have anything
additional to report on this topic L1ntil the results of the Florida Supreme Court
published its ruling and the January 29,2008 Presidential Primary Property Tax
Referendum results are known. Motion to table this item indefinitely. Mr. Mears.
Second Mr. Main. Approved 8-0.
7. New Business:
a. Bavshore Cultural Arts (BCA) Event Support Request. Mr. Jackson directed the
Board to the Bayshore Cultural Arts backup information in the Board's packet
and introduced Ms Sondra Quinn to present her request for financial support
from the CRA for the Hearts in the Garden event at the Naples Botanical
Garden. Ms Quinn gave an event overview and focus of the event, and stated
that the event was supported last year by the CRA Advisory Board. She
discussed the budget and request $5,000 promotions and marketing support for
the 2008 event to be held on February 14, 2008. Motion to recommend to the
CRA Board to provide $5,000 sponsorship from the CRA's Promotions and
Marketing budget as reimbursement for fixed event costs: Mr. Main. Second: Ms
Beatty. Discussion: Mr. Mears stated that the CRA gave $5,000 last year and he
thought it was a one-time sponsorship as a start-up assistance. He felt there
were other options that the CRA could provide to assist the group: 1) lend the
money to the group, or 2) buy 150 tickets at $35/ticket to give to the
underserved community (chLlrches and schools) that would not be able to afford
to attend. The mission of the CRA is infrastructLlre. Ms Beatty said she like the
ideas but was not sure that they were doable. If the CRA loaned the money, the
BCA may not be able to pay back soon, for the BCA to carry on the flame of the
'cultural district'. it takes lots of work and time to get that established. She felt
that the sponsorship again this year was worth it. Mr. Gunther explained that the
CRA would not be "giving" away the money. but investing it into the community
and an organization that is giving back to the commLlnity. He felt that even
though this is a second request, all the CRA-AB needs to do is justify the
sponsorship to the CRA Board. Mr. Main stated that he felt the sponsorship was
in the mission of the CRA. and yes, infrastructure is too, but this is part of the
whole concept. Approved 6-1 (Mears against) Ms Barry (Naples Botanical
Garden representative) abstained.
b. Sweat EQuitv Grant Approval (Residential - John Hotz). Mr. Fowle excused
himself from the meeting. Ms Trone explained the CRA's new Sweat Equity
Grant and detailed the CRA's first application for Mr. John Hotz' rental property
on Captains' Cove. He and his renter will do the work consisting of landscape
and irrigation, repaint the house and make repairs to the driveway. The
estimated cost of materials is over $1.000 and meets the requirements of the
Sweat Equity Grant. Motion to recommend to the CRA Board to approve: Mr.
Gunther. Second: Mr. Main. Approved 7-0.
c. Site Improvement Grant Approval (Commercial - Randv Sevier). Ms Trone
briefed the CRA-AB on the commercial site improvement grant for the old Ship's
Inn building, owned by Bayshore Road Holdings, LLC, which is transitioning to
the Tiki Beer Bar under the proprietorship of Ms Heidi Cochran. The
improvements include new signage, fencing, landscaping and installation of rain
gLitter. The total project cost come to $3.828.03 which qualifies for a33% match
December 4 2007 CRA.AB Minutes
3
161 A~
grant of $1.266.55. Motion to recommend to the CRA Board for approval,
pending review and approval of the County Attomey's office: Mr. Mears.
Second: Mr. Main. Approved 7-0. Ms Trone briefed the Board on the add-on
agenda item, Site Improvement Grant for Ms Francis Pallis. This is a residential
grant to replace existing windows and a door with impact resistant windows and
storm proof door. Total cost for the project is $14,947.00 which qualifies for a
33% match of $4,935.51. Motion to recommend to the CRA Board for approval,
pending review and approval by the County Attomey's office: Mr. Mears.
Second: Mr. Gunther. Approved 7-0.
d. Approve Attendance at Housina Conference. Ms Trone briefed the CRA-AB on
her request to attend a state-wide Housing Conference on January 15. 2008.
Motion to approve: Mr. Gunther. Second: Ms Beatty. Approved 7-0.
e. January 2008 CRA-AB Meetina Date Chanae to January 8. 2008. Mr. Jackson
reminded the CRA-AB that the first Tuesday in January is the 1st, and
recommended that the Board move their meeting date one week to January 8,
2008 at 6PM. Motion to move the date: Ms Barry. Second: Mr. GLlnther.
Approved 7-0.
f. Notice of January CRA-AB Election of Officers for 2008. Mr. Thomas reminded
the members that the Board elects a Chairman and Vice Chairman in January of
each year and that this will be on the agenda next month.
8. Citizen Comments. Mr. Thomas asked if there were any comments from the audience.
There were none.
9. Adiournment: The regular meeting was adjourned at 7:35 pm.
and forwarded by Lindsey Thomas, CRA-AB Chairman.
P.."t........ b...v f
N 4. . '<;; I" b l. I % 2 0 0 7 eRA - A B M i nut e 5
4
16'1 A 1
THE BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT
RFCE!VED
AREA~
A. G E N C Y FFfi G d 2008
27.JO 8AY~HORE DRIVE, (lNIT 17 N.-\PLES, FL 34112 PHONE 239.643.1115 FAX 239.775.4~13~-r;cH:i}t,n~'JC(!f1'miSsjoners
BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD
Tuesday January 8, 2008, 6:00 p.m.
2740 Bayshore Drive, Unit 10, Naples, FL 34112
Al!:enda
l.
RollCall
Fiala y~ ~
Halas -#.
f~e. nnin9,%".h) If' 0:-
;joyle .~--
~lJletta~~-
2. Adoption of Agenda
3.
Adoption of Minutes: Regular Meeting December 4, 2007.
4. Executivc Director:
a. Project Updatcs:
I. CRA Newsletter - Trone
II. January 25, 2008 CRA & CRA-AB Joint Workshop
5. Old Business:
a. MSTU Meeting Brief - South Bayshore Drive Improvement
6. New Business:
a. Approve Quotes for Trailer Demolition - Jourdan
b. Bayshore Corridor Strategic Developmcnt Vision
c. Elections: CRA-AB Chairman & Vice Chairman
7. Citizcn Comments
8. Adjournment
Note: All meetings are publicly noticed in the Harmon Tumer Huilding(Administration Building). Please call the Bayshore/Triangle otlice at (239)
643-1115 if you have any questions ahout the meeting. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in
Ihis proceeding. you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Ph~ase .::ontact the Collier County Facilities 11anagement
Department located at 3301 Ea'" Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. 34112, (239) 774-8380: assisted 1i~1ening devices for the hearing impaired are
a...-ailable in the County Commissioner:.; Otlice.
Mise Cot'lllll:
DatelL ( .~
l
:~em#:
-;.~ to
j
THE BAYSIIORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVEI~~'lNT4GE1;\
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
2740 B_-\\'SHORE DRIVE tlNlT 17 NU'I.ES, rL 3,4112 PHONE 2l9,64J.IIL<; r,,\X 239.775,4456
BAYSHORElGATEWAY TRIANGLE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LOCAL ADVISORY BOARD
MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 8, 2007 MEETING
The meeting of the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Communily Redevelopment Advisory Board was called
to order by Chairman Mr. Lindsey Thomas at 6:00 p.m. at the CRA Office Meeting Room 2740 Bayshore
Drive, Unit 10.
1. Roll Call: Present: Advisory Board Members: Lindsey Thomas. Chuck Gunther, Steve Main. Bill
Mears, Ron Fowle, Karen Beatty. Maurice Gutierrez, Jill Barry, and Bruce Preble.
CRA Staff Present: David Jackson, Executive Director, Jean Jourdan Project Manager and Sue
Trone Operations Analyst.
County Staff Present: Marjorie Student-Stirling. Assistant County Attomey.
2. Adoption of Aoenda: Chairman Thomas asked if there were any additions or correclions to the
published agenda. Hearing none he asked for a molion 10 approve the agenda: Motion: Mr.
Main. Second: Mr. Fowle. Approved 9-0.
3. Adoption of Minutes: Chairman Thomas asked for a motion to approve the December 4, 2007
regular meeting minutes: Motion: Mr. Main. Second: Mr. Gunther. Approved 9-0.
4. Executive Director's Report:
a. Proiect Updates. Mr. Jackson gave a showed a CRA marketing video from Florida
Redevelopment Association. Ms Trone distributed the inaugurai CRA newsletter to the
Board for their review. She explained that the goal was to publish the newsletter
quarterly. Mr. Jackson reminded the Board that there was a scheduled joint workshop
with the CRA and that Immokalee CRA Advisory Board was invited to participate.
b. Mr. Mears asked for a status of the 17 acre disposition. He wondered if il was possible
to open up the property to the public for use until a project had been identified. Mr.
Fowle stated that there had been some private party interest expressed in discussions
with the staff and that there was some interest in a private offer for the land. Mr. Thomas
stated that we have a scope of work developed for the RFP that has not been advertised
yet. Mr. Jackson slated Ihat the residential sales markel has collapsed with over two
sheets of CRA homes on the MLS. The CRA condo market is active for empty nesters or
those in the second home market. Indications are the commercial market is slowing and
will continue to slow until the residential market steadies. Since this project is a mixed
use development (residential and commercial). and in light of other southwest Florida
mixed use projects being put on hold, the RFP has not been released.
5. Old Business:
a. MSTU Meetino Brief - South Bayshore Improvemenls. Mr. Jackson updaled the Board
on Ihe results of the Bayshore Beautification MSTU board meeting where the MSTU
agreed to jointly fund the initial field survey. right-of-way study and development of initial
designs to improve the conidor. The MSTU also agreed to allow the CRA to take the
lead to develop the scope of work. contact transportation consultants and acquire a
quote for services. The draft scope of work for conceptual design selVices and follow-on
'work orders' to continue the engineering designs are included in the Boards packets.
Motion to proceed and acquire contractor quotes for the scope of serves: Mr. Mears.
Second: Ms Beatty. Approved 9-0.
b. MSTU Meetino Brief - South Bayshore Drive Street Liohts. Mr. Jackson advised the
Board that the MSTU was interested in funding additional temporary lights on the
southern section for Bayshore Drive 10 complement the seven lights the CRA was
January 8 2008 eRA-AS Minutes
16 I A 1
installing. The MSTU agreed to let Ihe CRA take the lead, contacl FPL for a field survey
and quote to install lights on selected poles. The MSTU approved the expenditure of up
10 $3.000 per year for the lights, and they would repay the CRA through an
intergovernmental transfer.
6. New Business:
a. Approve Quotes for Trailer Demolition. Ms Jourdan presented two quotes for demolition
services for nine trailers in the Bayshore residential infill area. She asked for approval 10
contract Cross Environmental Services for demo services for nine trailers at $22,699.00.
and Gruelle Construction to demo one single family home for $3,170.00. Total cost for
demolnion services is $25,869.00. Motion to approve: Ms Barry. Second: Mr. Preble.
Approved 9-0.
b. Bavshore Corridor Strateqic Development Vision. Mr. Jackson presented a proposal for
the CRA to create a strategic development vision for the Bayshore corridor to quantify
vacant commercial parcels. investigate the development potential of the sites and
determine incentives to offer as a catalyst to redevelop sites. He stated that in the Board
packets there was a draft CRA Resolution that would charter the study and create an ad
hoc committee to perform the tasks. The committee would report to the Advisory Board
their findings and recommendations. Mr. Mears asked that this type of work is the
Advisory Boards job, so why was a differenl committee being created. Mr. Main agreed
that there would be a long education process for this new group and they would be
redundant to the Advisory Board. Mr. Gunter also agreed. Ms Beatty felt that including
new people would invigorate the communny and draw in new ideas. Mr. Mears felt that
the CRA should contract a consultant to revise the CRA redevelopment Plan. Ms Barry
felt that a consultant wouldn't have the interest of the community, they would just do the
work and leave. Ms Beatty thought Ihat a 2 year revision of the CRA Plan was 100 long
right now, and that Bayshore Drive corridor should be looked at soon. After a lengthy
roundtable discussion, Mr. Gunther made the motion to table Ihis item. Second: Mr.
Preble. Approved 9-0. Mr. Jackson asked the Board if they would consider conducting a
workshop in two weeks to further discuss the item so it could be brought back in
February. Motion: Ms Beatty to hold a workshop on January 22, 2008 at 6PM. Second:
Mr. Gutierrez. Approved 8-1, Mr. Mears against.
c. Advisorv Board Election of Officers for 2008. Mr. Main nominated Mr. Thomas for
Chairman and Mr. Mears for Vice Chairman. Mr. Mears said he would second the
nomination for Mr. Thomas but that he was term limned and would not be able to serve
the full term. Mr. Main modified his nomination to be for Mr. Thomas for Chairman.
Second: Mr. Mears. Approved 9-0. Motion by Ms Beatty to nominate Ms Barry as Vice
Chairman. Second: Mr. Gutierrez. Approved 9-0.
7. Citizen Comments. Mr. Thomas asked if there were any comments from the audience. There
were none.
8. Adioumment: The regular m~as adjourned at 7:45 pm.
/
.----
indsey Thomas. CRA-AB Chairman.
Approved and 1.0
January 8 2008 eRA-AS Minutes
2
161A
'""\
c..
"~"""r-.EIVED
; ., ~~-. .
'..~t _
. .~ \ ., '2008
;.."." I.'
,,2~, t. ,} "
Fiala
Halas
Henning.
Coyle
Coletta _
Citizen Corps Advisory Committee
Agenda December 19, 2007
(Physicians Regional - Collier)
,ejl!': (Jj (~ollni\l CmrmllSS!OnP,(S
3:00
Pledge of Allegiance
-Opening Remarks
-Roll Call
Chairman
Sheriff's Office CERV
USCGA Red Cross
Chamber of Commerce
Fire Chiefs CERT CAP
Veterans Council RSVP Salvation Army
EMS
City of Naples
PRMC
Health Dept
Everglades City
NCH
Medical Examiner City of Marco Island
Neighborhood Watch
EM
3:05 Approval of Minutes Chairman
3:10 Threat Update Sheriffs Office
3:15 New Business Chairman
. Elections Chairman
. Homeland Security Joe Frazier
. ESC Tour Jim von Rinteln
3:30
Old Business
Chairman
. EOC Update
. Flu Shots
Jim von Rinteln
Mary Ann Cole
3:45
Next Meeting/Adjourn
(January 167 )
Chairman
3:46
Tour of Hospital
Mise Carres:
10 I A?"
Dale:
Ilem#
I), '" "
/
ColeMaryAnn
1 6 r, ;~1 ,"\
ff l4 c..
Subject:
ColeMaryAnn
Tuesday, December 18. 2007 12:25 PM
BowmanDan; Capt. Alejandro Castillo; CC-Dan Zunzunegul; CC-Debbie Horvath; CC.Gerry
Sugerman; CC-Jerry Sanford; CC-Jim Elson; CC-Joe Wilkins; CC-John Brown; CC-Mike
Murphy; CC-Nfnl1555; CC-Scott Erickson; CC-Ted Soliday; ColeMaryAnn;
'DanAnderson@tdle.state.fl.us'; David Baer; DeArmasMaribel; Doug Porter (dporter143
@comcast.net); foord_m; FrazlerJoseph; Judy Nuland; Kathleen_Marr@doh.state.fl.us; Phil
Reid; reg buxton; Russ Rainey; Ryan Frost; schapin43@aol.com; scribnerj; TeachScott;
veitj; vonrintelnj; Walt Jaskiewicz
Meeting Reminder
From:
Sent:
To:
Importance:
High
All,
Just a reminder that the Citizen Corps will meet Wednesday, December 19th at 3 p.m. at Physicians Regional (8300
Collier Boulevard) in the lobby.
We need a quorum for elections being held, so please be there.
Thank you!
~ ann
Mary Ann Cole
Collier County Emergency Management
3301 East Tamlami Trail, Bldg F
Naples, FL 34112
Phone (239) 252-8000
Fax (239) 775-5008
www.collierqov.net
16 , If'lf!
Collier County Government
Communication &
Customer Relations Department
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Contact: Sandra Arnold
Public Information Coordinator
(239) 252-8308
www.colliereov.net
Dec. 12, 2007
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
COLLIER COUNTY CITIZEN CORPS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WEDNESDA Y, DECEMBER 19,2007
3 p.m.
The Collier County Citizen Corps Advisory Committee will meet Wednesday, December 19 at 3 p.m. at
the Physicians Regional Medical Center, located at 8300 Collier Boulevard, Naples. Please meet in the
main hospital lobby prior to 3 p.m.
In regard to the public meeting:
All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any,
in writing, to the board/committee prior to the meeting if applicable. All registered public speakers will
be limited to three minutes unless permission for additional time is granted by the chairman.
Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board of County Commissioners or quasi-judicial
board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore, may need to ensure that a
verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is to be based.
Collier County Ordinance No. 2004-05, as amended, requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in
any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners, an
advisory board or quasi-judicial board), register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and
Records Department.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this
proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the
Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL
34112, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing
impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office.
For more information, call Jim von Rinteln at 252-8000.
-End-
1/ '.~~esf
~
161A
,~,.,.~~
RECEIVED
JAN :! J 2008 1
~
Fiala
Halas
Henning
Coyle
Coletta. ..- -.----
V oting Members Present:
Collier County
Citizen Corps Advisory Committee
December 19, 2007
13u;:1I"0 oj County Commissioners
Russell Rainey, Community Emergency Response Team
Gerry Sugarman, RSVP
Walter Jaskiewicz, Coast Guard Auxiliary
Lt. George Welch, Collier County Sheriff's Office
Reg Buxton, Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce
Deborah Horvath, American Red Cross
Doug Porter, Naples Civil Air Patrol
Voting Members Absent:
(Excused Absence)
Jerry Sanford, Collier County Fire Chiefs Assoc
James Elson, Collier County Veterans Council
Captain Alejandro Castillo, Salvation Army
Floyd Chapin, Community Emergency Response Volunteers
V oting Members Absent:
(Non-Excused Absence)
Non-Voting Members
Present:
Jim von Rinteln. Collier County Emergency Management
Joe Frazier, Collier County Emergency Management
Chris Rakunas, Physicians Regional Medical Center
Bob Wetenkamp, Physicians Regional Medical Center
Meeting called to order at 3:00 p.m.
Pledge of Allegiance recited and roll call taken.
Approval of Minutes
Motion to accept the minutes of the November 21, 2007 meeting made by Gerry Sugarman and seconded by Debbie
Horvath. Approved unanimously.
Threat Update
Per Lt. Welch, there is no change - we are still at the Elevated Threat (Yellow) level.
New Business
Misc. Corres. I (p I IT 2-
Date:
Elections
Reg Buxton elected Chairman.
Russ Rainey elected Vice-Chairman.
Jerry Sanford elected Secretary.
Vote for positions was unanimous.
!!em#
u;
Homelalld Security
Joe Frazier attended a conference in Orlando and shared a few highlights. It was attended by homeland security
people, including Secret Service, FBI and CIA. Through intelligence, we are expecting a suicidal/homicidal
bombing to come to this country after the Presidential elections as a political statement. Looked at bomber
profiling, which entices people who are hopeless and helpless, and motivate them through the promise of heaven
j
161 A
~".'\
C
~
Collier County Citizen Corps Advisory Committee
December 19,2007
and paradise. 78 of the bomber's family will get into heaven as well. There was footage of children 3-10 years of
age training. They use the American and Israeli flags as floor mats and train them with live ammunition. Terrorists
are looking at hitting transportation areas, ports, etc. Terrorism money right now is very limited. We need to be
ever-vigilant. Public School buses and rail systems arc easy targets, as they are on set schedules. It was determined
that commerce is impacted $50k for every 15 minutes that roads are shut down. We need to get out of our
complacency' Joe has a full report on this conference - Jim von Rinteln will send it to the group.
ESC TOllr
Per Jim Y., the Citizen Corps group will not be able to tour the ESC at the topping ceremony tomorrow. Will know
better in January when the group can tour the building safely. The topping ceremony tomorrow is a Kraft
Construction Company-sponsored party, beginning at 11:30. You can park at Edison College and be shuttled to the
site. All are invited as a support group; however, you cannot go into the building.
Old Business
EOC Update
Per Jim Y., the project is ahead of schedule and in budget. There is still lots to be done. We got additional funding
of S325k from the Justice Department, to be used for technology in the building. This will allow us to get
computers, NY equipment, radios, additional antennas, etc. We are looking at December 2008 or January 2009-
the EOC to be open and functional by hurricane season of 2009. 23 Counties in Florida are building new
Emergency Services Centers. EMS should be moving in around the same time. Per Lt. Welch, the 911 Center is on
their own schedule - the Sheriffs Office priority is to get operations in there by June 2009.
Fill Shots
Per Mary Ann Cole, the Collier County Health Department is offering a final day of flu and pneumonia vaccines on
January 7"' from 9 a.m. to 12 noon at the Senior Friendship Center, 811 7'h Avenue South in Naples. Physicians
Regional Medical Center does not offer flu shots - check the walk in-clinics to see if they are giving any vaccines
Anyone over 50 should get the flu shot, and if over 60, get the pneumonia shot. If you are susceptible, you should
get these shots if you are over 50.
Other
Walt Jaskiewicz suggested that the Citizen Corps put together a float and enter a parade next year. It would be a
great way to get our name out into the community. Reg Buxton suggested that they look at entering the boat parade
as well. Mary Ann will add these suggestions to future agendas.
Russ Rainey discussed Marco CERT is awaiting the Health Department's approval to implement their "Red Plan"
They are looking to write a grant to get a trailer or van to cover the island. Currently, "Code Red" is a phone
system that calls 60,000 people in an hour. They will alert a block of people in a particular neighborhood - condos
are fine for traditional way. Discussion of Florida being listed as one of six states that has not ordered meds for the
pan flu. Per Jim Y.. EMS has ChemPacs and PMRC has medications that are stored in a safe and hidden location.
Per Debbie H., American Red Cross got with local sewing groups and sent 840 stockings for the troops in Iraq.
Palm Beach County Chapter did only 200, so Collier County did a great job. A $lOk donation was made to ARC
for $200 gift cards to active military people who are Collier residents. Target offered to donate $2,000 in extra
cards, since these were purchased from them. 40 cards have been given out so far, and are given on a first-come,
first-served basis. She was on Fox News this morning to get the information out, and received calls. Debbie will
get the information to the Sheriffs Office - Jim Elson is aware of this program as well. The person who donated
the SlOk wishes to remain anonymous - ARC is going to see if this person will help fund the veterun's vehick.
^'
~ ,r,; I ,~
>:,j
I, g H c"'l
~
3
Collier County Citizen Corps Advisory Committee
December 19,2007
The Sheriff's Office did the Adopt-A-Soldier program and had hoped to serve 500 soldiers - they were able to serve
1,380. They are already being given donations for next year.
Lt. Welch attended a tabletop exercise at the Seminole Casino. This included Immokalee Fire and security. There
were no County people invited. It was a good exercise. looking at the mutual aid. The tribe takes care of their own.
It was a learning experience.
Joe Frazier had information on Psychological First Aid training. He took this course and suggested that Citizen
Corps groups look into it. Mary Ann will get the date and information to the group.
Joe's exercise is moving along. Judy Scribner from Emergency Management will contact the CERT teams for
volunteers, Red Cross would like to have their Ministerial Committee work with this drill. This is a great addition
for their disaster mental health issues.
Next Meeting/Adiourn
Next meeting to be held on Wednesday, January 16,2008 at the Board of County Commissioners chambers.
Motion to adjourn the meeting at 3:45 p.m. made by Reg Buxton and seconded by Gerry Sugarman. Approved
unanimously. Tour of Physicians Regional Medical Center by Joanie Jeannette, COO. followed.
Minutes submitted by Mary Ann Cole
Approved by Chair:
J
~",/
~7 /tI k;r
./
Reg Buxton
// //
//// cJ 3"
Date
1'6 I A,\4~
November 29,2007
TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE
~,_ I/,j} .1.1f1f___ CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD p
~u Naples, Florida "
""'I1I""~-f~k-- November 29, 2007 "e,,,"''''''''
~~~ I~E REMEMBERED, that the Code Enforcement Board, in
f)
':, ':. )ll~: I:;;'
and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met
on this date at 9:00 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Community
Development and Environmental Services, Room 609/610,2800
Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, with the following members
present:
CHAIRMAN:
Sheri Barnett
Larry Dean
Kenneth Kelly
Richard Kraenbring
Gerald Lefebvre
Lionel L'Esperance (Alternate)
George Ponte
Charles Martin (Excused Absence)
Jerry Morgan
ALSO PRESENT:
Jean Rawson, Attorney for the Code Enforcement Board
Michelle Arnold, Code Enforcement Director Misc. Co<<1lS ICo I ft S
Bendisa Marku, Operations Coordinator Date
Item II:
Page 1
Copies to,
./
~611A -3
. .. <"
November 29,2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Good morning. At this time I'd
like to call the Code Enforcement Board of Collier County to order.
Notice, the respondent may be limited to 20 minutes per case
presentation, unless additional time is granted by the board. Persons
wishing to speak on any agenda item will receive up to five minutes
unless the time is adjusted by the chairman.
All parties participating in the public hearing are asked to
observe Robert's Rules of Order and speak one at a time so that the
court reporter can record all statements being made.
Any person who decides to appeal a decision on this board will
need a record of proceedings pertaining thereto and, therefore, may
need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes testimony and evidence upon which the appeal
is to be based.
Neither Collier County nor the Code Enforcement Board shall be
responsible for providing this record.
May I have the roll call.
MS. MARKU: Mr. George Ponte?
MR. PONTE: Here.
MS. MARKU: Mr. Gerald Lefebvre?
MR. LEFEBVRE: Here.
MS. MARKU: Mr. Larry Dean?
MR. DEAN: Here.
MS. MARKU: Ms. Sheri Barnett?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Here.
MS. MARKU: Mr. Jerry Morgan?
MR. MORGAN: Here.
MS. MARKU: Mr. Richard Kraenbring?
MR. KRAENBRING: Here.
MS. MARKU: Mr. Kenneth Kelly?
MR. KELLY: Here.
MS. MARKU: Mr. Charles Martin has an excused absence.
Page 2
16 I A 3
November 29,2007
Mr. Lionel L'Esperance?
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Here.
MR. YBACET A: Ladies and gentlemen, before we start, may I
have your attention.
I would like to give you first a little pointer about the
microphones that are in front of you. They aren't the same as the ones
at the BCC board. They're more directional. So we're going to need
for you to talk closer into them, if you don't mind. Thank you very
much.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you.
May we have approval of the agenda.
MR. DEAN: Motion to approve.
MS. ARNOLD: I've got some changes.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's what I figured.
MS. ARNOLD: For the record, Michelle Arnold, Code
Enforcement Director.
Under Item 4-A, it was noted as a motion for withdrawal. We're
changing that to a motion to dismiss without prejudice. Same case.
And we have -- we're withdrawing Case No. 4-C-l, that's Board of
County Commissioners versus John Farrell.
We have a stipulation for 4-C-4, and that will become 4-B-1.
We have a stipulation for 4-C-12, and that will become 4-B-2.
And we also have a stipulation for 4-C-13, and that will become
4-B-3.
Do we have another stipulation just now?
We also have a stipulation for 4-C-6. And just because of the
order, we're going to be making that 4-B-4.
There's also a request to hear 4-C-5 right after 4-B-4, which is
same property owner. He's abated that violation, so we're just going to
go through that quickly.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: 4-C-5?
MS. ARNOLD: 4-C-5 will become I guess 4-C-l.
Page 3
".;,.(.,'
", ',' ' ", """,",
' " j' (.
J. 0 :-11-.*'
November 29,2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I will give the board just a few
minutes to arrange their packet, and then we'll go for an approval.
MR. DEAN: Motion to approve the agenda.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. KRAENBRlNG: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Move to the public hearing.
There's a motion for a continuance, the Board of Collier County
Commissioners versus Glen and Sharon Van Slyke. Oh, I'm sorry, I
missed the approval of minutes. I messed up. Let me back up.
Go for the approval of minutes on October 25th, which I'll have
to abstain, because I was not present.
MR. DEAN: Motion to approve the minutes of October 25th.
MR. PONTE: Second.
MR. KELL Y: We have an approval and a second. All those in
favor?
MR. KRAENBRlNG: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
MR. MARTIN: Aye.
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Anybody opposed?
MR. L'ESPERANCE: I also have to abstain.
MR. KELL Y: Motion carries.
Page 4
16 IA~ j
November 29, 2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Now weill go to the public
hearings. I'm sorry.
And the first case will be motion for continuance of Board of
Collier County Commissioners versus Glen and Sharon VanSlyke.
MS. ARNOLD: There's actually a motion prior to that. The
motion to dismiss without prejudice.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Oh, I thought you -- okay, we
have to approve that. Sorry, people.
We'll go back to Board of Collier County Commissioners versus
Horseshoe Creek Partners, LTD. Motion to dismiss without prejudice.
MS. ARNOLD: That's a motion that the county is presenting to
the board. I believe you all have been provided a copy of that.
We did hear that case previously, so what we're trying to do at
this time is to dismiss the prior case so that there's no -- that can be
removed off the property. And then you have a hearing for another
case today that's going to be presented for -- that's the issue. So we're
needing to remove the prior case.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Entertain a motion?
MR. LEFEBVRE: Make a motion to dismiss the case.
MR. DEAN: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. KRAENBRING: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Now then, we'll go to
motion for continuance. Board of Collier County Commissioners
versus Glen and Sharon VanSlyke.
Page 5
1#""-
16 ~~-3
November 29,2007
MS. ARNOLD: And that particular request was provided to you.
The respondent I don't believe is present, and is requesting a
continuance for I think three months.
MS. O'FARRELL: Ninety days.
MS. ARNOLD: Ninety days.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Looks like she's going to be out of
town, according to the paperwork that we received.
I'll entertain a motion.
MR. PONTE: I'd like to just make an observation. The request
that the respondent has made to continue this case for at least three
months I think is unreasonable. This case has been around since July
of2006. She hasn't suggested a specific date, it's just at least three
months. I would say it's okay to continue this to January 24th, but
certainly to deny the continuance indefinitely.
MS. ARNOLD: And that would be the county's position as well.
MR. LEFEBVRE: I second that motion, if it is a motion.
MR. PONTE: It's a motion.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. KRAENBRING: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We're going to go ahead and
continue until the 24th.
The next case is a motion for modification of orders. And it's
actually three cases. CEB-2006-16, 2006-17, 2006-18.
But before we start, I would like to read something from our rules
and regs. And it basically states, a party may motion a rehearing on
Page 6
-, r-" .41
., ..'-J; d;
November 29,1007
the board's order based only on grounds that a decision was contrary
to evidence of that hearing involving an error or ruling of law which
was fundamental to the decision of the board.
The written motion for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons
thereof. The motion for rehearing shall be written and sent to the
secretary of the board within 10 days of the date the order is received
by the party but no event more than 20 days from the date of mailing
of the order.
The order of the board shall be stayed and the time for taking an
appeal tolled until motion for rehearing has been disposed of and the
decisions received by the parties provided.
However, that in no event shall the order be stayed for a period
longer than 20 days from the date of the mailing of the rehearing
notice or decision.
In that case, this isn't necessarily a request for a rehearing.
They've never made that request, as I understand. It's a modification of
orders, but we can't really do a modification of orders, according to
our attorney in this case.
And I'm going to turn it over to Jean to explain it, because I
spoke to her prior to this meeting.
MS. RAWSON: Well, basically there's nothing in our rules and
regulations, or actually in the statute that allows you to modify an
order. You can have a rehearing, but you have to do it in a timely
fashion. And that hasn't happened here.
Obviously they can file an appeal within 30 days. That hasn't
happened here. So he -- the respondents are back here to ask you for
some relief. Maybe a better motion would be an abatement of the
fines.
You know, you've read his motion to modify and, you know, I
certainly want you to hear his legal argument, but you have to be able
to make orders within the parameters of our rules, which parrot
Chapter 162.
Page 7
1"6 , A 3
November 29,2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So in order to proceed, Michelle, I
don't think we can hear it as requested.
MS. ARNOLD: Well, I would suggest that you hear what the
request is and give Mr. White his day in court, so to speak.
MS. RAWSON: Yeah, I would, too. Because you can't
necessarily go by the title in a motion. You know, let's hear from Mr.
White and see what kind of relief he is requesting.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay.
MR. WHITE: Good morning.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We need to swear you in, please.
MR. WHITE: Yes, Madam Chair. I was going to ask that all
parties who intend to testify.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay.
(Speakers were duly sworn.)
MR. WHITE: I'd just like to start, Patrick White with the law
firm of Porter, Write, Morris & Arthur. I'm here representing Jerry and
Kimberlea Blocker on the three matters listed on your agenda under
my motion and request.
For the record, we did in fact ask for a rehearing timely last May.
And regretfully that was not allowed. So what we have is a
circumstance where although there is a bit of procedural novelty to
what we're looking for, I don't believe it's unprecedented. This board
has in fact issued orders nunc pro tunc, one of those lawyer words.
And I apologize, you know, I have to bring those things forward.
What that basically means is that you go back and you revise an
order. Because under the notions of fairness and fundamental equity,
you are recognizing that there is some aspect of your prior order that
should be modified. And that's why I've stated it as an order to modify
that prior order.
Now, for many reasons we submitted this well in advance so that
we would have all of the board members able to review what those
reasons in support of the motion were, so that you could make a test --
Page 8
16 I f~. ~.W4~
November 29,1607
or apply the test, rather, of fundamental fairness, and operating in a
way where equity would apply.
And I believe there's nothing in your rules of procedure that
prohibits you from doing this. We're not asking for a rehearing, we're
simply saying that your prior order is one that had cause for revision
and modification, because there were aspects of it that are
fundamentally unfair. And two ofthem of course are the notion that
you've asked us to take an action that seems to be in excess of what's
necessary to abate the violation. That being to actually request
demolition permits.
The other of course being to take an action to rezone the property
where, in a timely manner consistent with your order, we went in and
spoke with the county staff and they advised us essentially, you can't
get there from here. If you want a rezoning, you have to first obtain
the comprehensive plan amendment.
So we're stuck in a place where unfortunately we would prefer to
be able to find some way to abate these violations, but regretfully the
county's own processes prevent us from doing so in a timely way.
So I have no other means to come to you than to say would you
please look at your order on at least those two points and consider
under the notion of what's fair and reasonable modifying your order.
You still have jurisdiction of this case. You still have the
opportunity to essentially, if there is no rule on the subject, to create
one. There's nothing -- in fact, therels specific authority for that in
your rules and procedures. You can set them. And there's nothing that
says that you can't set them as you find them necessary, based upon a
particular case.
And I submit to you that this case is as factually long in its
history, well over 50 years, complex in terms of its procedural history
as well, in terms of what rules are supposed to have been applied
when, what the effect of your order is going to be on already approved
and existing building permits, and the idea that somehow we're just
Page 9
i b iA 3
November 29,2007
trying to get to the place where I hope you want us to be and that is to
abate this violation in a way that's consistent with the county's rules.
So to come full circle, the first part of that motion is to ask to be
treated in the same manner as other mobile home parks,
nonconforming mobile home parks. To be treated in the same way that
the folks who owned this property before my clients did were given a
chance, at least under the Notice of Violation that was issued back in
200 I to the Collins. Part of their abatement that was available to them
was the site improvement process plan -- excuse me, site improvement
plan process, the SIP.
So we're asking, have been asking, and hopefully can stop asking
here, to be treated fairly and reasonably by simply being able to
participate on the site improvement plan process that the rules allow
for. And I've provided in your packets the Land Development Code
that creates the opportunity for that to take place. But in order to do
so, you do have to modify your order.
So as a procedural point of fundamental fairness, I think there are
at least three very compelling reasons why the motion should be
considered, and I believe granted.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I've got a question for you in
regards to the consent order that's in our packet.
MR. WHITE: Yes, Madam Chair.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It was not -- the one copies that
we have were not signed.
MR. WHITE: That's correct. They are pursuant to the
Department of Environmental Protection attorney's request. Attorney
named Karen Bishop. We have until tomorrow to sign those, as do the
actual landowners of the junkyard next to us. Both parties, if you will,
have till tomorrow to sign.
We would love to walk out of here knowing that we're going to
be able to abate the violations by way of the site improvement plan
process, work with the Department of Environmental Protection and
Page 10
t~eL1er 2( 2007
the adjacent property owner to complete the cleanup. I have
photographs here showing the substantial level to which that adjacent
right-of-way has been cleaned up, the waste tires removed, many junk
cars removed, at least out ofthe easterly 40 feet of the 80 feet of the
Broward right-of-way.
On Tuesday, the Board of County Commissioners also acted to
grant us quitclaim deeds for the county's interest in that full 80 feet of
right-of-way, plus the other side. That all goes to the owners of the
junk yard, the Ratliff trust. The Blockers get the easterly 40 feet of just
Broward.
The significance of that is that for the first time with those deeds
in hand -- and I told you this is a complex case. The deeds themselves
are conditioned by the county upon a signing the DEP consent order.
So there's a very strong possibility that we're going to sign the consent
order tomorrow, because we believe we need to have the ownership of
that easterly 40 feet in order to in a meaningful way participate in the
site improvement plan process.
That 40 feet gives us the distance and area to provide for proper
setbacks, to create an appropriate wall or fence, and any buffering and
landscaping that may be required.
Additionally, the site improvement plan process, as you may
know, would allow for the replacement of some of those mobile
homes, travel trailers that could benefit from being replaced.
So we feel that it is fair and reasonable to ask for that type of
relief. Our predecessor in title had that opportunity. I don't understand
why five years elapsed before the case was prosecuted, but we are
where we are. And welre simply asking to effectively be treated in the
way that others have.
Now, I understand some ofthe county's objections to that
position, but I think we have good evidence and good explanations for
every aspect of it.
So if you have another question, I'd be happy to answer it.
Page 11
16r 11' 3
November 29, 2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I do, but I think Mr. Kelly has one
also, so I'll go ahead and let him speak.
MR. KELLY: I have more of a comment. I believe if we have the
ability to dismiss an order, I think we have the ability to amend one, as
we did in the first case yet today. So that's just my position.
MS . RAWSON: You do have the ability. And we do issue orders
nunc pro tunc when therels been a mistake. Generally speaking, it's a
clerical mistake. Maybe I, you know, put 2006 instead of2007. But
nevertheless, we have issued orders nunc pro tunc when errors have
been made.
So I would ask you to listen to what Mr. White has to say, listen
to the evidence, listen to what the county has to say and make your
decision.
MR. KELLY: And I would suggest that Mr. White walk us
through step by step and then if we could have county say their
position on each one of these. It would help us understand it.
MR. WHITE: Well, I appreciate that.
Your question, Madam Chair, for follow-up?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'll wait. It may be answered.
MR. WHITE: The significant part of the motion, and why I think
it appears first, relates to the site improvement plan process. And the
county's position has been, and I believe may explain why it wasn't
offered before, that they believe that the use is just flat out illegal. The
evidence that I provided you in the form of affidavits from former
Board of County Commissioners, two of them, as well as a neighbor
who has lived at a location literally around the comer since the mid
Fifties. Those affidavits stand simply for the idea that this use has
been there since the mid Fifties.
The difficulty we've had in working this case forward is that
we've had to keep going backwards further and further in time to be
able to demonstrate either of two things: One, that this use existed and
has continued to exist without interruption since the early -- since the
Page 12
. , ~ -.At 1~
Nov~mber 29, f<)07
mid Fifties. Before, to the best of our ability, we can even find that
there were any county zoning regulations.
That has been my challenge. I have said to my client, welre at the
point where we need to ask Mr. Peabody for the Wayback Machine,
because we keep going back further and further in time. Because the
county's position is, you know, once youlre illegal, essentially you're
always illegal and therefore you're not nonconforming. Our position is
MS. ARNOLD: I object to that. I'd rather speak for the county
rather than have Mr. White speak for the county.
MR. WHITE: Let me clarify, board members. My understanding
of the county's position is that welre illegal. And that is -- in that
regard. And that is not something that was stated to us until the past
two months. So we had nothing to kind of focus on as to what the
objection was until that point in time.
We have been working diligently since I was retained to work on
this case. Almost daily on finding a way to abate this violation under
the law. We believe that the site improvement plan process is one
that's available in any zoning district anywhere in the Immokalee
urban area.
As you may know, the Immokalee master plan and visioning
committee is currently looking to revise the Growth Management Plan
provisions for the Immokalee master plan.
My clients are engaged in that process, along with other family
members that have an interest in that community.
As you may know, the Blockers own a lot of property in the
Immokalee area, so theylre very interested in what happens in that
community and what its reputation is throughout the county and the
region. So they're actively engaged in that process.
And I mention that because it goes back to the point about what
do you need to do in order to get the rezoning? In order to get the
rezoning that you directed us to do and that we went to the staff and
Page 13
16.' A 3
November 29,2007
asked about in a timely manner at a pre-application meeting. They
said we're sorry, we can't accept your application for a rezoning
because you first need to file for a Growth Management Plan
amendment.
Now, filing for a Growth Management Plan amendment at the
very point in time when the process to amend that master plan is
ongoing didnlt seem to indicate that it was a wise expenditure of
money on my clientls part to hire someone to file for a small-scale
amendment to the tune of some $50,000 just to start that process. As
some or all of you may know, that is at a minimum a two-year
process. And thereafter, probably 12 months for a rezoning is, I would
say, very optimistic. The more typical circumstance, that it's a
minimum of 18 months.
So the point is as to your order, the time that was originally
afforded was not sufficient to achieve the objective that you charged
my clients to meet. So we feel that on that ground it makes sense to at
least extend the time frame to allow for the Growth Management Plan
amendment process to work forward. And we would suggest to you
that it makes far more sense to do that as part of the Immokalee master
plan visioning process.
And to just give you an update on where that is, we appeared -- I
appeared, along with Mr. Blocker, in front of that committee in
August. And I asked them specifically not about the rights or wrongs
of this case but I asked them, is there anything in either the existing
master plan or what you're proposing to change in the master plan that
would somehow make us ineligible for the site improvement plan
process at the comprehensive plan level?
And I have a letter back from the chairman, Mr. Thomas, that
was directed to the County Commission Chairman, Mr. Coletta, that
basically says there isn't anything about what we have or would do in
our changes that would preclude you from being able to participate in
site improvement plan process. It is a process that's intended to operate
Page 14
6r, A ~
November 29, 2crrf7
anywhere and everywhere in the Immokalee urban area.
Now, the relevance ofthat is that it creates kind of an umbrella
under which the Land Development Code provision that I put into
your motion packets actually operates. And again, not looking to
speak for the county, but the explanation I believe as to why we may
not have been afforded that SIP opportunity under the original Notice
of Violation is because if you've read that provision in the portion that
I highlighted for you, it indicates that the only way that the window
that closed some year plus ago can be reopened is if this board orders
it.
The reason why that provision is in there is one that I'm very
familiar with. I wrote it. I wrote it working with Michelle. And we
wrote it for the very simple reason, one, we had to reextend the
window for a case that was then ongoing, and we did. But that time
has since passed.
But we also recognize that there was the possibility -- and I know
there are other cases out there where there are nonconforming mobile
home parks in the Immokalee urban area that are going to have to
come through somehow to have their violations, if you will,
addressed. And they're going to need this provision. And you're going
to, I believe, have to consider, the same as in this case, whether you're
going to apply that provision in a way that allows that way to cure the
violation. Effectively to say all those other nonconforming mobile
home parks that have been have been in existence for decades and the
county finally locates and prosecutes the case, you're going to be
afforded the opportunity to consider whether or not site improvement
plan process is the appropriate way to abate that violation.
The county's position, as I understand it here today, is we didn't
originally qualify for that, one because the window was closed, and
they weren't thinking that you could or should reopen it because we
weren't, quote, nonconforming, unquote.
You'll remember back to April of last year there was a significant
Page 15
. 6' 1f~.,~
November 2~2007
amount of discussion about what were the prior rules. In fact, we've
been cited for violating the 70 regulations that are no longer even law.
They've been repealed. Repealed for decades. And yet we're cited for
violating under your order a law that no longer exists.
Minor point, one not worth mentioning in my motion, but
recognizing this is a very complex case. A lot of procedural history, I
have to bring it up.
Next I think it's important to understand that that time line I was
talking about and why it's significant that we have an opportunity for
you to understand this use has existed for well over 50 years. This
board and some of your members struggled with the idea that there
were permits from the Sixties for some of those mobile homes that
Mr. Blocker presented to you and that are part of the record. And you
struggled with the idea of well, how do we effectively eliminate those.
I'd suggest to you that this board doesn't have the authority to
revoke a building permit. I think that only the Board of County
Commissioners and potentially the building official have that
authority. But suffice it to say, that it was something that was
something that was of concern to this board. And thatls because you
understood the idea of something being grandfathered.
This case is one that is the closest to what I would call
great-grandfathering, because the history is so long. We've shown you
by the way of the affidavits that there is a continuing long history. The
thing that's missing -- those are the facts. The thing that's missing is
the law.
And the other thing I came before this board and asked for last
month was an opportunity to have a public records request responded
to by the county. It's been a cause of concern, not only for the county
but for my client as well. And that's because we previously had a copy
of a map that although dated 1952 we couldn't tell you when it was
actually effective.
We have been through the Clerk of Courts, all of their files and
Page 16
16 I A 3
November 29, 2007
microfiche, we've had one of their attorneys in the vault looking for
Zoning Book 1, Page 1 that's supposed to exist. We have gone back to
the root of zoning regulations in this county, and we cannot find
anything that tells us when it began specifically. But the best we can
determine is that we believe we predated those existing rules. So --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Are you going to need a whole lot
longer? Because there is a 20-minute --
MR. WHITE: Well, I appreciate the opportunity that if! have
three cases before you that I might have 20 minutes for each. I
apologize for making that request. I know there's a lot of folks here
who would like to be heard as well.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Well, we have a pretty big docket
today --
MR. WHITE: I understand. I understand, Madam Chair.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- so if you can make it as
expedient as possible, we would appreciate it.
MR. WHITE: My point to you is that as far as grandfathering and
nonconforming go, we believe that we have demonstrated by what we
have provided you and what we additionally can provide if you care to
see it, is that this property has been -- has either existed as a use before
there were any county rules, which is more the case, or even if you
accept the alternative, the last -- the next best set of rules we have are
from 1959. And we believe that under the zoning district we think this
property was then designated as, which is Commercial 3, our use was
permitted under those rules.
So the point at which we became nonconforming wasn't until the
early Seventies when the county changed the zoning district to
industrial.
So what you have here is a case where effectively the county has
sat on its heels for well over 35 years. They attempted to prosecute the
case in 200 1. In 2001 they recognized that SIP was an appropriate
way to handle this case and to abate it.
Page 17
16 I A" 3
~ . '
November 29, 2007
And I submit to you that if the county had gone forward at that
time with the prosecution, my client wouldn't be here today. The site
improvement plan process would have been followed, there would
have been no violation, and we all would have been moving on to the
next case.
So what I'm asking you to do is to recognize that there's law that
allows you to amend your order in this fashion. If for some reason you
don't think that that's fair and best in this case, then the alternative I
put before you is at the minimum you should add two more years to
the time frame we have just to get us back to the place where we
might get a comprehensive plan amendment or work through the
Immokalee master plan visioning process, as we presently are
attempting to do, in order to be able to get the right kind of land use
designation for this property.
And at a minimum, I fail to understand why it is at all necessary
to have to apply for demolition permits for the structures that are on
that property. Every other use case that I've seen, and I've prosecuted a
bunch of cases in my career, simply ceasing that use is sufficient to
abate the violation. Why, can anyone explain to me, my client has to
go and destroy his buildings and his trailers in order to come into
compliance with the law. Something seems fundamentally unfair
about that. And I ask you to well consider the motion.
Ifthere are any questions, I'm happy to address them. There's
certainly more I can bring to your consideration of this, but I
understand that time is limited. And I thank you for bearing with us
thus far in listening to what I have to share with you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, at this time I'll turn it over
to Michelle.
MR. WHITE: Are there any questions?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I think we'll come back to
questions at the end so that we can hear both sides and then question.
MS. ARNOLD: I would agree with Mr. White that you all have
Page 18
161 'J 3
November 29, 2007
the ability to amend your order. I would just caution the board to look
really at what he's asking you to do in his request.
Because this matter was heard by the board in April of 2006, and
yes, Mr. White pursued the first part of the order to request a
pre-application meeting, and did hold a pre-application. So he met that
portion of it. And he was advised at that preap. that he needed to go
through a plan amendment to get the rezone, but failed to pursue that
plan amendment and failed to request an amendment of your order at
that time when he was advised by staff that that was a route that would
remedy the violation.
Instead of coming back to the board at that time, there was an
appeal, in a sense, not the normal appeal that would have gone to the
civil court, but another appeal that went to a special magistrate
process. And much of the things that he discussed with you today was
discussed at that special magistrate process, and the special magistrate
MR. WHITE: Madam Chairman?
MS. ARNOLD: Can I have my opportunity, Patrick?
MR. WHITE: No, ma'am, I don't believe you can. I just -- let me
make my point of my objection.
MR. DEAN: Excuse me. No, sir.
MR. WHITE: I donlt get to tell you why I object? I object -- I
didn't say anything before, Madam Chair, because she was talking
about the procedure of that statutory process. When she wants -- when
Ms. Arnold wants to speak about the substance of it, I have to tell you
that I have to object because it's a matter thatls presently under
litigation, okay? We had to file an appeal, if you will, of that appeal
based upon the way that the Board of County Commissioners
considered that.
So I don't want to inject into this proceeding whatever the
substance of that discussion was. And I'm not trying to hide the facts,
I'm simply saying it's a matter that's under litigation, and I don't know
Page 19
l~'J A 3
November 29,2007
what relevance it has to you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Hold on.
Jean, I'm going to ask for guidance.
MS. RAWSON: He's made his objection for the record.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We can still hear what Michelle
has to say, correct, with that objection in mind?
MS. RAWSON: Yes, you can.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, go ahead, Michelle.
MR. WHITE: I'm assuming that my objection's denied.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Your objection is noted.
MS. RAWSON: I'm not ruling one way or another on his
objection, obviously that's not my role. I'm just telling you, if you note
his objection for the record then you can make a decision to go ahead
and hear what Ms. Arnold has to say.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Well, go ahead--
MR. WHITE: But the point is you're going to have heard what it
is she has to say that I believe may prejudice --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: But we also know that you've
appealed it, so we do know that there's got to be legal reasons for that
appeal.
MR. WHITE: Understood. Thank you, Madam Chair.
MS. ARNOLD: As I was saying, much of the arguments that
were made during that special magistrate process were similar to what
was mentioned to you today. The special magistrate upheld your
decision that there was a violation, there is a violation, and --
MR. WHITE: Madam Chair, I have to again object. Ms. Arnold I
understand is probably explaining to you what she believes the effect
of that magistrate's report was --
MS. ARNOLD: I'm just explaining in my opinion --
MR. WHITE: It had nothing to do --
MS. ARNOLD: -- just like you did note the county's opinion.
MR. WHITE: It had nothing to do with the Code Enforcement Board
Page 20
16 / A3
November 29,2007
order that you entered. It simply was a discussion about those
elements of the statute. And they don't authorize the special master to
make a determine about what you all did. That is still something that
we at the end of that process -- and Ms. Rawson had indicated to you
that we had not yet appealed.
We don't get a right to appeal your April order of '06 until after
the conclusion of the litigation involving the special magistrate. So we
don't know what that court may someday do when we file our appeal.
But we haven't yet.
What I'm trying to do today is to avoid having to go through all
of that process.
So I appreciate what Ms. Arnold is saying, but the magistrate was
not able to comment about your order in the manner -- in the way that
she's characterizing it. Sorry.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Go ahead, Michelle.
MS. ARNOLD: So the special magistrate order has nothing to do
with your order, but yet he can appeal your order after the termination
of what the special magistrate did. Okay.
I just wanted to note that although the special magistrate in Mr.
White's opinion did not uphold your order, those were all things that
were presented through that process. The argument that he made was
presented through that process.
It's the county's position that although something did exist in the
Fifties, what exists today and what was brought to you in August of --
or April of 2006 is not what existed back in the Fifties. It is
progressively increased. And we have a residential use in an industrial
zoned property.
I was a major part of the development of the site improvement
plan process when it was developed back in the county in the -- I can't
even remember how long ago that was. And it was not contemplated
at that time or any time to apply to uses that are not authorized by the
zoning district.
Page 21
q A 3
j; 6 I
November 29,2007
Thatls what we have here in this case. We have a residential use
in the industrial zoning district.
The site improvement plan process can be used anywhere
throughout the Immokalee area is absolutely correct. But the zoning
always is looked at to determine whether or not that use is authorized
in that zoning district before we apply it.
There was a Notice of Violation served to the prior property
owners. It was served in error. That is the reason why it was not
pursued or prosecuted before this board.
Again, I want to caution you all to look at what he's asking you
all to do with the amendment of your order. Essentially he's asking
you to allow something that staffhas, and the zoning department has
determined that is not authorized. The site improvement plan is
allowed but not in an industrial zoning land for residential purposes.
MR. WHITE: May I respond?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Basically, Michelle, what you're
saying is even ifhe were to apply for a site improvement plan, it
probably would not be granted because of the zoning?
MS. ARNOLD: Absolutely.
MR. WHITE: May I respond?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes.
MR. WHITE: There are a number of points that I think need to
be made clear for the record, and I hope you'll indulge me.
First among them is that as to the prior NOV, if the reason why the
county didn't pursue it is because it was in error, as to the idea of the
SIP, why didn't they process it as to the legality of the use?
But let's step past that. Let's look at the NOV in this case. The
NOV in this case does not cite my client in anyone of those three
cases for some kind of an expansion of a nonconforming use. It's not
in there. Itls not cited.
So if the countyls position today is that somehow welve done that
impermissibly, that isn't part of this case.
Page 22
16/}~ 3
November 29,2007
And that's not just some fine legal point of law, it is the
fundamental thrust of what we're saying to you is unfair about this
process.
And as to the magistratels proceeding, the facts that were then
being discussed are different than the facts that further research by
using the Wayback Machine have uncovered. And in fact we were
unaware of some of the things at that time.
Our challenge -- my challenge has been that every time we come
up with something that we think is a way to be treated fairly and
reasonably, the county throws down another barrier. And I understand,
their job is to gain compliance of the law.
We're saying to you that we believe we qualify under that
provision. You've got the words in front of you. In the LDC it talked
about the Immokalee nonconforming mobile home overlay district.
That district is the entirety of the urban area. It doesn't say anything at
all in there that you have to be in a zoning district where the use is
permitted. If that were the case, logically you wouldnlt need the
provision. You'd be lawful. You wouldn't be nonconforming.
But let me tell you about a case that's presently being considered
by the county for SIP. It's a case that in fact --
MS. ARNOLD: I object. Has nothing to do -- we're talking about
the Blocker case. And the relevance or the facts of this other case, and
I don't even know what it is, is no relevance on this one. We're dealing
with this matter right now.
And I just want to correct the record with regard to bringing up
something new. Mr. White is the one that brought up the Wayback
theory, and I just wanted to clarify that that wasn't -- we brought this
case to the board for illegal land use, and that's what we brought to
you all. And I wasn't introducing any further violations by insinuating
that this was something that had grown through the years, I guess, as
implied by Mr. White.
The fact remains, we brought the case for what -- for those
Page 23
1 {:';'l A
November 29, 2J
violations noted.
He did bring up there are older provisions that have been since
repealed. Those were merely showing a historical -- the historical
nature that he's arguing that that particular residential use had never
been authorized, with the exception of a single caretaker's quarters.
And what we were dealing with is multiple units in an industrial area.
MR. WHITE: My point is that the prior regulations that we did
discover I think stood for the proposition. At the time we didn't know
what the district was. Everybody assumed it was industrial.
What we subsequent to the magistrate process discovered by this
intensive research that I would submit may be something that the
county should have done beforehand, but in any event we've now
done at great expense and time, demonstrates that under the
preexisting rules before 1970, this is a permissible use in the industrial
district. We don't believe it was industrial. We think just like the
junkyard next door, it was then commercial C-3. And under those
rules, it was a permissible use.
So the point is either we -- and we think we preexisted even those
earliest rules that we can find.
So the notion is that at some point we were either preexisting,
and when the rules changed and the industrial district was created in
'72, I believe, we became nonconforming.
If we're nonconforming, we're not illegal. And we qualify under
those rules.
And I will tell you for the record and correct Ms. Arnold, that there
has been no determination made by zoning about this issue. In fact,
one of the reasons I said to this board last month I needed time till this
month was to get that public requests record answered.
I went down, my paralegal did, and attempted to find the very
map that we had found before. It doesn't exist in the county's files
today. Maybe they couldn't find it, I don't know. But the reason I
asked for it is because as part of our analysis to try to determine what
Page 24
:'G ( ~;,'~,
~.
November 29, 2007
was the effective date of that map, because it had a 1952 date on it but
it didn't say something like adopted in 1952. The plat that predated
that says yes, accepted as to the road right-of-way. These zoning--
this map doesn't have anything like it on it.
So we went through and for every platted subdivision that was on
there, every feature that was identified, a school, the farmer's market,
we went back to the best of our ability to determine when those things
came into existence.
So my map, the only copy I had, has scribbles all over it of our
notes.
So in order to come to you with a clean document, we went to the
county and asked for those records. They no longer exist. No one can
find any ordinances earlier than the ones in the early Seventies that
actually adopted the zoning regulations that apply to these lands.
But to the best of our ability to determine, we're nonconforming.
And you have the authority to allow us to go forward. But you have to
amend your order.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Kelly, do you have a
question?
MR. KELLY: Thank you, Mr. White. I'm glad that you brought
up the original notice of violation and subsequently our order, because
if I remember correctly the biggest issue that I had in my mind was a
safety issue, health and safety issue. And although I'm not completely
adverse to granting an extension of time in order for you to pursue the
process, I would really like to know that there has been considerable
effort to make sure that the residents, especially children, were at least
safe in that community until somebody determines whether that is
industrial or commercial or allowed or not, improved, otherwise, that
contradicts our order.
MR. LIESPERANCE: Madam Chair, also if! could piggyback
your comments. This seems to be turning into a rehearing. Did we
intend that to happen this morning?
Page 25
I 6" A 3
November 29, 2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: No, we did not.
And I would like to try to ask everybody to keep that in mind,
that we do not want to rehear the case. We're trying to listen to your
request and give both parties the ability to express their side.
Do I have anybody else --
MS. ARNOLD: Can I just make a suggestion? Because this does
seem like it may not be ending any time soon. We do have a few
stipulations. Maybe we can go through those stipulations quickly and
then come back to this?
MR. WHITE: I have no objection to that, Madam Chair.
And in fact, as to the idea that we may need to stipulate to something
else, we would stipulate to the fact that we violate today's zoning
district. Thatls not a problem. We understand we're a residential use.
And the other thing is, we would stipulate to a violation of the
nonconforming provision, if that's required to amend your order,
which I believe it is.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: At this time frame I think --
MR. WHITE: I have photos for Mr. Kelly or others who may
choose to see them.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm going to table this until we get
through the stipulations, because I think itls unfair to the people in the
audience that are waiting. Because I think this is going to be lengthy.
MR. WHITE: I'm more than willing to do so, Madam Chair. And
I appreciate it. And if there had been an original desire on the part of
the county for us to hear this, along with our order imposing fines, we
would have probably been agreeable, try to wrap it up all at once.
MS. ARNOLD: I don't think that request was ever made to me,
so __ if that request was made to me, I would have forwarded that to
you all.
MR. KELL Y: I make a motion we table this.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?g
Page 26
.,;:r:
77 ,6 ,.1
~.~ ~
A 3
November 29, 2007
MR. KRAENBRING: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Opposed?
MR. DEAN: I oppose.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay.
MS. ARNOLD: Okay, we do have one other stipulation that
came in after we approved the agenda. That was item 4-C- 3. And so
the first one would be, that you're going to consider, is Craft, James
Craft. Board of County Commissioners versus James Craft.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Where do you want the 106, the
three to go in, at the end?
MS. ARNOLD: That would go in at the end.
(Speakers were duly sworn.)
MS. O'FARRELL: For the record, Susan O'Farrell, Collier
County Code Investigator, Environmental Specialist.
This would be CEB Case No. 2007-107, and Department Case
No. 2006060535.
Mr. Craft owns a property out on the East Trail heading down
into the Everglades, and what I observed on it was mounds of
vegetative construction litter and a large amount of debris.
Weare here today to present a stipulation. Mr. Craft has agreed
to the violations that existed under Ordinance 05-44, the weed, litter
and exotics control ordinance, sections six through eight, and are
described as property with mounds of vegetative, miscellaneous and
construction litter. Therefore, we have agreed that Mr. Craft will pay
the operational costs in the amount of$600,81 within 30 days of this
hearing, incurred in the prosecution of this case.
He will abate all violations by: Removing all litter on the
property as defined by the Collier County Ordinance 05-44, Section 6
Page 27
fI~.3
November 29,2007
through 8, within 30 days ofthis hearing or a daily penalty of$100
per day will be assessed as long as the violation persists.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Does he have to notify you?
MS. O'FARRELL: I'm not finished. I was trying to let her catch
up a little bit.
The vegetative debris occurring from the property due to storm
damage, which would have been Hurricane Wilma, he is being
allowed to dispose of in an uncovered, excavated three -- no deeper
than three-foot pit on the property.
This is something that I had checked out with the engineers from
our engineering department, and this is allowable as long as it's an
uncovered pit.
The construction debris will be removed from the property and
the vegetative debris that has been dumped on the property by
opportunitistic cleanup people after Storm Wilma will be removed
from the property to an approved landfill facility, and Mr. Craft will
notify me when all of these have been abated.
I would like to add that Mr. Craft has been working diligently for
the last month removing debris from the property. He has graded out
areas where there were large amounts of mulch and topsoil, so the
property is becoming more appropriate to what it should look like. He
has worked very hard since he started.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Craft?
MR. CRAFT: Yes, ma'am.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do you agree with the stipulated
agreement?
MR. CRAFT: Yes, ma'am, I do.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Kelly, do you have a
question?
MR. KELLY: So it was illegal dumping that caused this?
MR. CRAFT: Yes, it was. During Hurricane Wilma I was out of
town for about 30 days. When I come back, they had used my
Page 28
161 A ~
November 29, 2tl'07
property to dump trees and debris and stuff there.
MR. KELLY: Is 30 days going to be sufficient for you?
MR. CRAFT: It is going to be, because I'm going to make it.
With Christmas and New Yearls -- I'm hauling to a separate company,
and as long as they donlt close down on me, we're fine. And they said
as long as they get plenty of work, they're working through that. So
yes, 30 days will be enough. Ifnot, I have to come back and can ask.
But I really believe that I will work whatever I can. I've got a full crew
down there working. We've been working there for a month now, and
we believe that we will have it cleaned up.
MS. O'FARRELL: Could I just add one thing, Mr. Chairman? It's
not all illegal dumping. There was -- a certain amount of it was
illegally dumped, but there was some storm debris from his own
property that he had piled up in into piles and there was some
construction debris I think from other projects maybe that he was
working on.
MR. CRAFT: Yeah. And that part had been cleaned up a year
ago, the construction debris --
MS, O'FARRELL: And I placed a stop work order on his
property and that was when he started cleaning up,
MR. CRAFT: Right, we cleaned all that up. But the debris that
was cleaned from Hurricane Wilma, we went through and picked up
all the trees, piled it in a pile, and according to county ordinance welre
not allowed to pile it on top of the ground, we have to dig a three-foot
hole and put it in the ground. So it wasn't that we -- all the property's
in piles, and actually one major pile. So we just didnlt dig the hole is
what the problem was.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Richard?
MR. KRAENBRING: I just wanted to make sure 30 days was
good. Otherwise, the holidays are coming up, the gentleman has been
working diligently, and it may be better just to give him 60 days.
MS. OIFARRELL: Well, I was on-site yesterday and I believe
Page 29
] 6 , j~ ~
'-,~ O:(I;i:
November 29, 2007
he's about 60 percent completed, so I think 30 days would be plenty.
MR. CRAFT: Can I put a stipulation in? Ifwe have a problem,
we can come back and talk? I will -- I believe I will have it cleaned up
in 30 days.
MS. O'FARRELL: I explained to Mr. Craft that ifthere is an
imposition of fines hearing and he had gone over because of the
holidays that I would testify that we give him some relief on those
fines. I just don't want the case to go any farther than it already has.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Anybody else have any
questions?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, 1'11 close the public hearing
on that and --
MR. LEFEBVRE: I make a motion to accept the stipulation.
MR. KELLY: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have a motion and a second.
MR. PONTE: 1'11 second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. KRAENBRING: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you.
MR. CRAFT: Thank you very much, appreciate it.
MS. OIF ARRELL: Thank you, Mr. Craft.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Michelle, ifI'm in the correct
order, is the next case 2007-1177
MS. ARNOLD: Correct.
Page 30
r6/A 3
November 29, 2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Stipulated agreement for Raymon
Cabrera and Rosa --
MS. ARNOLD: No, that would be Tollgate Commercial Center.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I messed up, sorry. I read the right
number but pulled the wrong case.
Tollgate Commercial, James Nici, registered agent.
MS. O'FARRELL: James Nici is being represented by Mr. Neil
Dorrill.
(Speakers were duly sworn.)
MS. O'FARRELL: For the record, Susan O'Farrell, Collier
County Code Investigator, Environmental Specialist.
This would be CEB Case No. 2007-117, Department Case No.
2005050579.
The Tollgate property has quite extensive preserve area and over
the years had not been maintained on a regular base and had become
infested with exotics. And we have been working over the last two --
three years now in getting this property cleaned up.
Some of the problems that we have had have been the turnover
from the developer to the condominium association.
I began preparing the case for CEB because I was frustrated by
the lack of response. However, when Mr, Dorrill and I began
communicating with each other, immediately action began to be
taken. They are probably 90 percent in compliance right now with the
exotic vegetation being removed. The wetlands are being cared for.
I was on the site day before yesterday with Mr. Dorrill who has
been very good about meeting me on-site and ruining shoes and
walking in mud to get this thing taken care of. They have had a
boundary survey done for the border along 1-75, which shows that
they do have little more exotic removal to be taken care of.
In this case we are presenting a stipulation where Neil Dorrill is
representing the Tollgate Commercial Center. The violation is that of
Sections 3.05,07(A-D) and (H) of the Collier County Land
Page 31
161 ~
November 29,2007
Development Code Ordinance 04-41, and are described as preserve on
property contains a wide variety of plant species including but not
limited to Brazilian Pepper, Air Potato, Melaleuca, Earleaf Acacia and
Java Plum.
Right now all that we have on the property is the Brazilian
Pepper, because they've been working towards compliance.
The Tollgate Commercial Center has agreed to pay the
operational costs in the amount of689.02 within 30 days of this
hearing incurred in the prosecution of this case.
They are going to abate all violations by: Remove all exotics
from the preserve area following the standards set forth in
3.05.07(H)(g)(ii) within six months of this hearing or a daily penalty
of $100 will be imposed as long as the violation persists.
The removal of the exotics shall follow the above mentioned
standards, with special attention paid to the following phrase: All
exotic vegetation within the first 75 feet of the outer edge ofthe
preserve will be physically removed. Any exotic tree that is removed
must be cut down to grade and the stump treated. Exotic vegetation
within the interior of the preserve beyond 75 feet from the outer edge
area can be treated in place if it is determined that the physical
removal will not -- cause more damage to the native vegetation in the
preserve area. I said "not" by accident, so I want to make sure that it's
"will" cause.
Where prohibited, exotic vegetation is removed, but the stump
remains. The stump must be treated with United States Environmental
Protection Agency approved herbicide mixed with a visual tracer dye.
Control of exotics will be conducted on a yearly basis or more
frequently when required. They will obtain any necessary Collier
County or state permits for the removal of vegetation.
That would be because there are some wetlands on the property,
if in the future they need to remove exotics from that area.
Mr. Dorrill has agreed to this and I'm presenting it to you today.
Page 32
l~f A
November J, 2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Does he have to notify you when
all the --
MS. O'FARRELL: Yes.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- exotics have been removed?
MS. O'FARRELL: Yes, Mr. Dorrill will notify me when the
exotics have been removed.
I would like to make some comments, and that is that I gave them
60 __ six months to do this small amount, because Mr. Dorrill is faced
with a new budget year, and I think he's run up to a wall in terms of
money in order to finish the project. So I'd like to give him time to get
a new budget approved by his board in order to have money to
continue.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Dorrill, do you have -- do you
agree to the stipulations?
MR. DORRlLL: (Witness nods head affirmatively.)
MR. LEFEBVRE: Just a --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any comments?
MR. LEFEBVRE: -- comment?
Yes.
In the order it states that it will be hand removal, and I didn't --
MS. O'FARRELL: It's hand removal for the first 75 feet, but
most -- it's already all been done in that area.
MR. DORRlLL: Our contractor has done all hand removal thus
far. Itls quite a good wetland area, and most of it is a created wetland.
But the work that has been done there, and the cypress trees that have
been planted there are actually thriving at the moment, in spite of the
drought conditions. And so we have a very good licensed contractor
who has been doing this work.
It has been constrained by the fact that it is adjacent to 1-75
right-of-way that is entirely infested with Brazilian Peppers. And
many of the pepper trees are growing over. But all ofthe work thus farrhas been hand work, not mechanical work.
Page 33
16 1 -If' ~~\
.p'~
November 29,2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions, comments?
MR. PONTE: I'm just a little concerned about -- you say six
months?
MS. O'FARRELL: I'm trying to work with Mr. Dorrill in terms
of his budget and the process that he has to go through in order to get
more money to finish the job. I'm worried that if we only give him 30
days to finish, he's not going to have the budget in time, and then he's
going to start incurring fees.
So because he's worked so diligently with me on this, I'm trying
to make it possible for us to finish this case with a positive closure,
rather than making it more difficult.
MR. PONTE: When will the new budget be approved?
MR. DORRILL: The new budget will be January.
If! can back up maybe just 30 seconds. This case is a situation
where a developer did not comply with his permit conditions or the
original development order. In the interim period of time, where this
case began, he turned the association over quickly to the property
owners. The community has been -- it's all commercial property -- has
been completely sold, and the owners of the property now run this
commercial condominium association.
They inherited this problem from a developer who shirked his
responsibility under the original Notice of Violation.
But I will tell you this: For these group of commercial property
owners, it's been a very difficult fiscal year. Three of the largest
property owners have not paid any of their assessments this year and
are now facing liens and possible foreclosures as a result of not paying
their assessments. So I only have about half of the remaining property
owners who are paying quarterly into the association.
I think your staff has realized, since our firm was hired by the
property owners and with absolutely no money we have actually
exceeded the original time frames that we were given to do the
removal in phases.
Page 34
16' A 3
November 29,2007
But at this point I'm out of money. And if necessary, our firm
will pay these costs on behalf of this not-for-profit property owners
association in order to comply until I can get access to new funds in
the first quarter ofthe new fiscal year that starts on January the 1st.
MR. PONTE: Thank you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions or
comments?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: If not, I'll close the public hearing
and look for a motion.
MR. LEFEBVRE: I make a motion to accept the stipulation.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear a second?
MR. KRAENBRING: I'll second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. KRAENBRING: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. Good luck.
MR. DORRILL: For those of us who have entered into and are
trying to work with the county, I want to thank you for tabling that
prior motion, for those of us who are attempting to work in good faith
with your staff and this board.
MS. OIF ARRELL: Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Dorri11.
MS. ARNOLD: Madam Chairman, the next item would be
2007-118, Naples South Realty Association.
(Speakers were duly sworn.)
Page 35
',.>'1.:
. .~
161 ~Y1"Y: '.c'
November 29, 2007
MS. O'FARRELL: For the record, Susan O'Farrell, Collier
County Code Investigator, Environmental Specialist.
This is CEB Case No. 2007-118, Department Case No.
2003120279.
It is a violation of Collier County Land Development Code
Ordinance 04-41, as amended. Sections 4.06.05(J)(l) and (2),
maintenance of required landscape.
The description ofthe violation is that the required landscape has
fallen below the standards of the site development plan.
The Naples South Plaza, which is located on 41, has been a case
that I've worked on and several other investigators have worked on
prior to me since 2003.
For some reason we have been just stymied by being able to keep
trees alive in the islands in this parking lot.
As of yesterday I drove over there and the trees have all been
installed due to the hard work and again diligence of Mr. Havens here
who's representing Richard Baer, who is the registered agent for the
LLC.
The irrigation has been replaced. They've had trees replaced three
or four times in the last six months. We've had vandals come in and
turn off irrigation, we've had people come in and screw down the lids
on the bubblers. It's just been one ofthose cases that we'd just like to
die.
So __ and I know Mr. Havens feels the same way.
MR. HA YENS: Three-hour drive from Palm Beach, absolutely.
MS. OfF ARRELL: SO we have come to a stipulation agreement.
Mr. Havens is here on behalf of Richard Baer and Naples South
Realty .
He has agreed that the violations were as stated. He has agreed
that the violation are Sections 4.06.05(J)(2) of the Collier County
Land Development Code Ordinance 04-41, as amended, and are
described as required landscape has not been properly maintained and
Page 36
16(')
November 29, 2007
has fallen below Collier County approved site development plan
standards.
They have agreed to pay the operational costs in the amount of
$1,235.62 within 30 days of this hearing that were incurred in the
prosecution of this case, and to abate all violations by restoring the
required landscape of the property to the standards set by the Collier
County approved site development plan, SDPI 2006 AR 8135, to
include the replacement of dead and dying required plant material in
the property buffers and landscaped areas and fully operational
irrigation within 30 days of this hearing or a daily penalty of $100 per
day will be imposed as long as violation exists.
And that the -- Mr. Havens will notify me with the violation has
been abated. Sorry, I keep forgetting that one.
I would like to say that all the trees are now in place, they've all
been staked as I have requested, the irrigation is all in place, and I
have fervent hope in my heart that it will stay that way for a long time.
I know that Mr. Havens knows that I will be watching the
property, because I have explained to him that with this adjudication
the next step would be to go straight to the Code Enforcement Board
for another hearing if I happen to drive by and 10 out of the 20 trees
are dead.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Hopefully we can find the vandals
too in the process.
MS. OIF ARRELL: Yes, that would be nice. That's been very
difficult.
MR. HAVENS: Send me a photo of it or something.
MS. O'FARRELL: I would also like to say that since Mr. Havens
took over this property, he has been easy to work with, he's been
available by cell phone, always answered my phone calls. He has been
there bye-mail, hels kept on top of his landscaper. And I think at one
point even told his landscaper he was going to fire him if he didn't get
his act together and start making these trees look right. So I would like
Page 37
16-1 A 3
November 29,2007
to say thank you to Mr. Havens for working hard on this job.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Havens, do you agree with
the stipulations that have been --
MR. HAVENS: Yes, ma'am, I do.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do we have any comments?
MR. LEFEBVRE: Just one comment or question. I just want to
make sure that you state for the record that you do have the authority
MR. HA YENS: I'm sorry?
MR. LEFEBVRE: -- to represent--
MR. HAVENS: Yes. Yes, I do.
MS. O'FARRELL: The stipulation is actually signed by Mr.
Baer. So he's here representing Mr. Baer, but the appropriate, you
know, final I guess responsibility has been signed by him.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Okay, thank you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions or
comments?
MR. PONTE: Just one. Has the Sheriffs Department been
notified of this repeated vandalism?
MS. OIF ARRELL: That would be something you'd have to ask
Mr. Havens.
MR. PONTE: I'm curious about that, because you're stipulating
to clear up the problem within 30 days, but the vandalism could return
in 35 days. Maybe extra patrol or something needs -- the property just
needs extra attention.
MR. HAVENS: Well, we have notified them. And we actually--
one of the programs I'm putting in place -- I'm relatively new with the
company, actually since February.
We have vacant space at the plaza, and I'm working with Collier
County Sheriff right now to set up a substation.
And I think it's not necessarily our plaza but it's the entire area.
So right now I'm looking a way to donate the space for their use.
Page 38
16 JA 3
November 29,2007
MR. PONTE: Terrific. Thank you.
MS. O'FARRELL: And I was out there this week, two days prior,
in order to have something to tell you at the hearing today, and there
were two policemen in the back having lunch or something. You
know, they sit in their cars. So there were policemen on property.
MR. PONTE: Thank you.
MS. O'FARRELL: You're welcome.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions or
comments?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: If not, I'll close the public hearing,
ask for a motion.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Make --
MR. PONTE: I make a motion to accept the county's stipulation
as read.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. KRAENBRING: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you.
MS. OIF ARRELL: Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Havens.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is he next one 2007-111?
MS. ARNOLD: Yes. Raymon Cabrera.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes. Raymon Cabrera and Rosa
Pittaluga.
Page 39
:. 6"" I~'
,~ 0
November 29,2007
MS. ARNOLD: Actually, we would ask that we remove Ms.
Rosa's names off both of those cases, because we've since found that
she's not responsible for --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay.
(Speakers were duly sworn.)
MR. SNOW: For the record, Investigator Kitchell Snow.
We have entered into a stipulation in this case. We have agreed
that there is a violation of Sections 5.06.05(M) of 04-41, the Land
Development Code. Specifically window occlusion exceeding the
allowable 25 percent.
We have agreed to remove any window occlusion in excess of
the allowable 25 percent within 14 days of the date of this hearing or a
fine of $150 a day will be imposed until such time as excess occlusion
is removed; and to cease displaying any signs in accordance (sic) to
and compliant with 04-41, the Land Development Code of
Unincorporated Collier County; and to notify the code enforcement
investigator when the violation has been abated.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Cabrera, do you agree to the
stipulated agreement?
MR. CABRERA: Yes.
MR. SNOW: Oh, did we say operational costs? I'm sorry.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes, I'm sorry.
MR. LEFEBVRE: What case are we hearing?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: 2007-111.
MR. DEAN: 111.
MR. KELLY: That's a whole different issue.
MR. LEFEBVRE: That's regarding the facade and 10 percent
painting, not the --
MR. SNOW: That's the occlusion? I'm sorry, there's probably --
therels two cases, so that's probably going to have to be 111 and not
110, for the record.
MR. LEFEBVRE: The 111, ifl'm looking at this correctly, is a
Page 40
16 f \, t~f
HJ<
November 29;2007
facade with more than 10 percent painted a primary second color or --
MR. SNOW: Correct. Itls going to have to be 1 -- III is the
facade painting?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Yes,
MR. SNOW: Then it's going to have to be 110.
MR. LEFEBVRE: It's being stipulated--
MR. SNOW: To 110, correct.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So we pulled the wrong case.
MR. SNOW: No, in the stipulation I probably wrote the incorrect
case number.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So we need to be doing 2010?
MR. SNOW: Yes, ma'am, 2010.
MS. ARNOLD: We need to change the stipulation.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Does the stipulation have 110 on there instead
of 111 ?
MS. ARNOLD: Yeah, it needs to be changed and initialed by the
property owner as well.
MR. SNOW: Weill redo that, sir.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Thank you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And he did not stipulate to the
other one, then, correct?
MR. KELLY: Correct.
MR. SNOW: No, actually we're going to hear the other case as
well. That violation's been abated. All we're asking for is operational
costs on that one.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Good enough. Just so that we get
it right. Okay.
MR. DEAN: The operational costs?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The operational costs are?
MS. ARNOLD: The operational costs -- we've got to check to
see if it's the correct cost, since the wrong number was given.
Page 41
. f, ~, A.. '., ~. .
.-, I H~,.,
. \d; ,
November 29,2007
MR. SNOW: I have it. 111 is 295.37.295.37.
MS. ARNOLD: Let's not confuse it. The stipulation that youlre
considering, the operational cost is 283.14, okay?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Do you want to go back
through it just so that we have everything?
MR. SNOW: Yes, ma'am.
Are we clear? It's 2007-110. 2007-110 is the case for the stipulation.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And the operational costs are
$283.14?
MR. SNOW: Yes, ma'am.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Does everybody understand?
You've got that?
MR. PONTE: Yes.
MR. DEAN: Yes.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, public hearing closed. May
I entertain a motion?
MR. LEFEBVRE: I make a motion to accept the county's and
respondentls stipulation.
MR. DEAN: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. KRAENBRlNG: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you.
MS. ARNOLD: We had the request to hear the other case at this
time as well, so if we can -- while the respondentls here, hear case now
2007-11.
Page 42
....11 r
- ~
~
November 29,2007
MR. SNOW: Real quick, Madam Chair?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Urn-hum.
MR. SNOW: This is a violation of the Land Development Code.
We request a finding of fact. 05-05-08 C--
MS. RAWSON: Both of you need to be sworn again.
(Speakers were duly sworn.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And actually Bendisa needs to
talk before Kitchell, so slow down.
MS. MARKU: For the record, Bendisa Marku, Operations
Coordinator, Collier County Code Enforcement.
The respondent is present and this is in reference to Code
Enforcement Board Case No. 2007-111, Department Case No.
2007081071.
!tIS Collier County Board of County Commissioners verses
Raymon Cabrera.
And for the record, we would also like to remove Rosa M.
Pittaluga, due to her not being the business owner.
The respondent and the board received a package of evidence and
I would like to enter the packet of evidence as Exhibit A.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I have a motion to accept
packet A?
MR. LEFEBVRE: Motion to accept.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in -- do I have a second?
MR. KRAENBRING: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. KRAENBRING: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed?
Page 43
.
16/.rc :>
November 29,2007
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you.
MS. MARKU: Violation of Ordinances 04-41, Collier County
Land Development Code, as amended, Sections 5.05.08(C)(13)(b).
THE COURT REPORTER: Excuse me, Bendisa, I will swear in
the interpreter at this time.
Mr. Ybaceta?
(Interpreter was duly sworn.)
MS. MARKU: Description of violation: A facade with more than
10 percent painted a primary, secondary or florescent.
Location/address where violation exists: 203 West Main Street,
Immoka1ee. Folio No. 33580560003.
Name and address of owner/person in charge of violation
location: Raymon Cabrera, 4862 Weymouth Street, Lake Worth,
Florida, 33463.
Date violation first observed: August 28th, 2007.
Date owner/person in charge given Notice of Violation: September
11 th, 2007.
Date on/by which violation to be corrected: September 27th,
2007.
Date of reinspection: September 28th, 2007.
Results of reinspection: A violation remains. Has it been abated?
MR. SNOW: It has been abated.
MS. MARKU: As oftoday, the violation has been abated.
At this time I would like to turn the case over to Investigator
Kitchell Snow.
MR. SNOW: Good morning. For the record, Investigator Kitchell
Snow.
I would like it be known for the record that Marlene Serrano
interpreted on the previous stipulation, that she did explain to him in
Spanish. I felt that was appropriate. Mr. Cabrera does speak English,
but just so he may be more comfortable in speaking Spanish.
Page 44
],6~'~ 3
November 29,2007
Just for the record, they have abated this. He's worked very
diligently since I've talked to him to try to do this. The property looks
a lot better. They still have some things they need to do, but we're
working with them on that.
All we're asking for is operational costs in the amount of295.37
in the prosecution of this case. And again, the violation has been
abated.
MS. ARNOLD: So the county would be asking that you find a
violation did exist.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Does Mr. Cabrera understand
that?
THE INTERPRETER: How much is the operational cost?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It's $295.37.
THE INTERPRETER: He understands that.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do we have any questions?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Close the public hearing. Look for
a motion first and finding of fact.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Make a motion that there is in fact a finding of
fact.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Violation did exist.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Violation did exist.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I have a second?
MR. MORGAN: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. KRAENBRlNG: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed?
Page 45
l61A "2
November 29;4007
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Look for a motion now as to
imposing the operational costs per the county's request.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Make a motion to impose the operational cost
in the amount of$295.37 to be paid within 30 days.
MR. DEAN: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. KRAENBRING: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. MARTIN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay.
MR. SNOW: Thank you for your patience today.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you.
Then we have the last stipulated agreement of 2007 --
MS. ARNOLD: We do have one more that was added. And
expect another one. They're making copies.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do you want to take a break then?
Cherie', how are you doing?
MS. ARNOLD: Before we take a break, there has been a request.
There is a respondent here that has a young baby, if we could
take her out of order. And I'll let you know what that is when I come
back.
(Recess.)
(At which time, Mr. Kraenbring is absent.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Attention. We need to bring the
meeting back to order, please.
Make note that one of our members had to leave, due to another
Page 46
i "i ,Pf.
) t1,'
, '::'<'1
November 29,2007
engagement. But we still have a quorum.
Michelle, the case next?
MS. ARNOLD: The next case is 2007-106, and it's Jaime Lam.
There is another stipulation that's going to be heard after that, which is
2007 -116, Subway Plaza, Incorporated. And then we'll go to Ms.
Ortiz, and that case would be 2007-120.
(Speakers were duly sworn.)
MS. WALDRON: For had record, Jen Waldron, Environmental
Specialist, Collier County Code Enforcement.
This is CEB Case No. 2007-106, Department Case No.
2006-031099.
The address of the violation is 3580 First Avenue Southwest.
The violation is of Collier County Land Development Code 04-41, as
amended, Section 03.05.0l(B), described as vegetation removed over
the allowable acreage without obtaining the proper permits.
The Respondent Linh Lam has agreed to the stipulation. He has
agreed to pay the operational costs in the amount of$455.76 incurred
in the prosecution of this case within 30 days ofthis hearing.
He's also agreed to prepare a mitigation plan which meets the
criteria stated in 04-41 as amended, Section 10.02.06.E.3. The
mitigation plan shall be prepared by a person who meets or exceeds
the credentials specified in Section 0.02.02.A.3. The respondent is
required to establish a monitoring program that would determine the
80 percent survivability of species of the plants used in the mitigation
effort over a two-year period, with replacement required to maintain
the 80 percent minimum annually.
A minimum of two reports will be submitted by the respondent.
This mitigation plan must be submitted within 60 days of this hearing
or a daily fine of $200 will be imposed for each day until mitigation
plan is submitted.
All plant materials must be installed in accordance with the
mitigation plan within 30 days of acceptance of mitigation plan or a
Page 47
161 A ~
,-:~
November 29, 2007
daily fine of $200 will be imposed for each day until the plant material
is installed.
And respondent agrees to notify code enforcement when the
violation has been abated to perform a site inspection.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Lam, do you understand the
stipulation?
MR. LAM: I do.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any questions, comments?
MR. DEAN: Just one question. Time frame. That was done in
March of'06 and we're all the way down to 8/16/07.
MS. WALDRON: I spoke to Mr. Lam today. The Notice of
Violation was served to his father who lives on the property and they
were never given the copy of the Notice of Violation. So the first copy
they received was the notice of hearing. So we agreed to give them
more time with the holidays also to get that in it.
MR. MORGAN: They've been very cooperative in getting this
work done?
MS. WALDRON: Yes.
MR. LEFEBVRE: I have a couple of questions. First of all, is
this area irrigated at the present time?
MR. LAM: Excuse me?
MR. LEFEBVRE: Is there irrigation?
MR. LAM: No.
MR. LEFEBVRE: We are going into the dry season, so what I'm
worried about is if these plants are planted, if they're going to survive.
MS. WALDRON: I believe there's someone on the property that
will be able to do irrigation, or you could set up temporary irrigation,
correct?
MR. LAM: Definitely, yes.
MR. PONTE: How much acreage is involved here?
MS. WALDRON: It's 2.73 acres. They're allowed to clear one
acre on the property. And the majority of the property has been
Page 48
0;;ov:rn~r2~007
cleared. There are still some trees left on the property. But he also
explained to me that appear lot of trees that were removed were
damaged from Hurricane Wilma and there were also a lot of dead
trees on the property.
So what will happen is the environmental consultant will take all
of that into consideration when they come up with a mitigation plan
for this property.
MR. PONTE: I just share my colleague's concern about the fact
that welre entering a very dry season and already having problems.
And if irrigation is not -- if an irrigation system is not in place now,
chances of survival of new plantings I would think would be at risk.
MS. WALDRON: Well, that's up to your discretion, if you would
like to postpone it until -- the planting until the rainy season starts. But
like this year we had a big problem because there really wasnlt a rainy
season, so.
MR. KELLY: Which is even --
MS. WALDRON: It's a very difficult situation, because we just
donlt know what's going to happen.
MR. KELLY: Which could potentially be a worse situation, now,
going into our dry season after already being so dry.
I'm concerned about the $200 a day fine. I think that's excessive. In
previous environmental cases it's been about 100 bucks a day. So that
was one comment.
And then also, out of that removal was there any exotics, and
should those be taken into consideration?
MS. WALDRON: There may have been exotics. Are exotics on
some of the adjacent properties. Usually towards the front of the
property, there is some Brazilian Pepper. And the environmental
consultant will take all of that into consideration when they do their
plan.
MR. KELLY: And is there a way to get an after-the-fact permit
and just get this approved?
Page 49
,; "..' II ~."
, I,,: i1 ti-
.", ,', I
N;vember 29;2.007
MS. WALDRON: There's really -- we wouldn't approve an
after-the-fact permit for this because it wasn't cleared for any kind of
structure or any kind of use, so --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: If not, I'll close the public hearing,
open it to the board for discussion, motion.
MR. PONTE: Well, I don't have a motion, but I have several
concerns. I do think the fine suggested by the county is high. I do
think that the respondent is at considerable risk of not being able to
cope with the survival of the plants. So I'm not quite sure how to word
the motion. Obviously there's a violation.
MS. BARNETT: Maybe lower the fine and extend the length of
time to get the plants planted?
MR. PONTE: Well, itls not the planting of the plants, it's the
watering of the plants.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Well, if we extend the time to
plant the plants, then it would be extended into the -- you could extend
it into the rainy season.
MR. PONTE: You're talking about extending it to April or May?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Um-hum.
MS . WALDRON: I just want to comment on that, too. Last year
the rainy season did not start till probably at least August, so --
MR. DEAN: Did I not hear the respondent say he had ways to
irrigate? Did you --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: He said he had somebody that
lived on the property that could water.
MR. LAM: Yes.
MR. LEFEBVRE: The problem I have, it's going to be watering
an acre or so ofland, more than likely. I mean, that's a lot to walk
around with a bucket or hoses or whatever the case may be. So --
MR. PONTE: They're already talking about putting limitations
Page 50
,.. A
16 lNovem~29, 2007
on watering just once a day -- I mean once a week, rather.
MR. LEFEBVRE: I think if we accept the 30 days to submit the
mitigation plan.
MS. WALDRON: Sixty days.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Sorry, 60 days to submit the mitigation plan
and maybe 120 dates or 150 days after that the plantings, that would
put them in a position where somewhere around potentially Mayor
June that they could plant and give a chance of these plants surviving,
or these trees surviving.
MR. PONTE: I think that's the right direction. You want to make
a motion? Or it is a motion?
MR. LEFEBVRE: No, I threw out a couple of things. So 1'11
make a motion.
1'11 make a motion that the 455.66 -- is that correct?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: 76.
MR. LEFEBVRE: 76, okay.
__ 76 be paid within 30 days. The mitigation plan submitted
within 60 days.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Or what's the fine?
MR. LEFEBVRE: Or a fine oflet's say $75 a day. And then they
will have -- well, I guess can I ask one question?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Urn-hum.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Very specific. How long does it usually take
to accept a mitigation plan?
MS. WALDRON: Usually if they have it submitted, I can get it
done in the same day. Ifthere needs to be changes, though, ifthere's
something on there that needs to be amended, then they will have
extra time to make those changes.
MR. LEFEBVRE: So we're looking somewhere around the --
yeah, end of January submittal of the mitigation plan at the worst case
scenario, another 15,30 days possibly to accept it ifthere has to be
changes. So we're into February.
Page 51
c, ,. i
I, (.., '
~ ......;.
A 3
November 29, 2007
So let's say 120 days after the mitigation plan has been accepted
to have the plantings in or a fine of$75.
MS. WALDRON: The only thing I see is what happens -- the
only problem I see is what happens if the rainy season does not start
again. Then he's held to these--
MR. PONTE: Then he's back here.
MS. WALDRON: -- time frames and we're back to the same
thing that we're doing right now.
MS. ARNOLD: Then he can come back and ask for a
modification.
MR. DEAN: Correct. Agreed.
MR. KELLY: Can I make a suggestion on your motion?
MR. LEFEBVRE: Sure.
MR. KELLY: Ifwe said 180 days to apply, approve, plant.
MR. LEFEBVRE: And have just one fine?
MR. KELL Y: Just one date, one fine, and kind of go from there.
This wi11leave it open.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I disagree with that, because I
think you need to get the mitigation plan in first so that he has
something to follow. And that could take time because he has to hire
someone to do that. So I think it needs to be in two parts.
MR. KELLY: Okay.
MR. LEFEBVRE: With those changes, I make a motion.
MR. PONTE: 1'11 second the motion.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed?
Page 52
16) ~ovlber 29,2007
(N 0 response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do you understand what we did?
We changed it.
MR. LAM: Yes.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So you pay the operational costs
of 455.76 within 30 days; you get your mitigation plan done within 60
days or a fine of$75 a day will apply. You will then have monitoring
again for two years, as she had stated before. We did not change that.
You can plant 120 days after the acceptance of the mitigation
plan, or $75 a day will be incurred. And you must notify her when that
is completed. Okay?
MR. LAM: Yes, thank you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you.
MS. WALDRON: Thank you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So the next case would be
2007-116?
MS. ARNOLD: Correct.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Subway Plaza. Is the respondent
Ajay R. Patel, registered agent, here?
MR. SANT AFEMIA: He was up until the last break. Never came
back from the break.
(Speaker was duly sworn.)
MR. SANTAFEMIA: For the record, John Santafemia.
S-A-N-T-A-F-E-M-I-A. Property Maintenance Specialist for Collier
County Code Enforcement.
This property -- or this case involves property located at 10565
Tamiami Trail North, also known as the Subway Plaza. It's CEB Case
No. 2007-116, Department Case No. 2007-040895.
I did meet with the property owner and registered agent, Mr.
Ajay Patel this morning and discussed the case with him. He did agree
to enter into a stipulation with me.
He agrees that the -- or he stipulates that the violations do exist.
Page 53
~o~mber 29, 2007
The violations are that of Sections 2.02.03, 1 0.02.06(B)(1 )(a),
and 10.02.06(B)(1)(e)(i) of the Collier County Land Development
Code, Ordinance 2004-41, as amended, and are described as a
commercially zoned structure with a second story being used as rental
property for the employees of the Subway Restaurant located on the
first floor.
Additionally, a second story has been altered from the originally
permitted condition without first obtaining Collier County permits.
Mr. Patel agrees to pay the operational costs of $432.45 incurred
in the prosecution of this case within 30 days of the scheduled hearing
date, which is today, and abate all violations by ceasing the use of the
second-story residential living space as rental property for all residents
except for what is allowable in the C-3 zoning description outlined in
the Collier County Land Development Code 2004-41 within seven
days of this hearing or a fine of$50 per day will be imposed for each
day the violation continues.
Additionally, he agrees to obtain all required permits, inspections
and certificate of occupancy for any unpermitted alterations to the
second-story living space within 90 days of this hearing or a fine of
$200 per day will be imposed for each day the violation continues.
Alternatively, the respondent may obtain a demolition permit and
convert the second story back to its originally permitted condition, and
obtain all inspections and certificate of occupancy within 90 days of
this hearing or a fine of $200 a day will be imposed for each day the
violation continues.
He also agrees to notify code enforcement, myself, when the
violation has been abated in order to conduct a final inspection to
confirm the abatement.
I did check the status yesterday on this property. He has been
issued a permit at this point, so he is well on his way to getting his
inspections and his C.O.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Did he agree to the stipulation?
16f
Page 54
161 A 3
November 29,2007
MR. SANT AFEMIA: Yes, he did. He did sign it. And like I said,
he was here up until the last break.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That is him back there?
MR. SANT AFEMIA: Oh, there he is.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Would you come up, please.
Cherie', I'll have to ask you to swear him in.
MS. ARNOLD: Can I just make a slight change? In the
stipulation, it does say C-3 zoning description. It really should be the
C-3 zoning district. Because the district describes all of the permitted
uses.
(Speaker was duly sworn).
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Good evening (sic), Mr. Patel.
I believe you were in the room when he was going through most of the
stipulated agreement.
MR. PATEL: Yes.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So I'm going to ask you, do you
agree to the stipulated agreement?
MR. PATEL: Yes, I do.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do we have any questions,
comments?
MR. DEAN: I have a question. How many people live on that
second floor?
MR. PATEL: At this time, none. At the time I think two or three
people were there.
MR. DEAN: So nobody's there now?
MR. PATEL: Sorry?
MR. DEAN: Nobody's there now, right?
MR. PATEL: No.
MR. DEAN: Thank you.
MR. LEFEBVRE: You said that there's a permit that has been
applied for?
MR. SANT AFEMIA: Correct.
Page 55
C' ," 'r A
1,1' J
," \" 'Novem 29,2007
MR. LEFEBVRE: What is that permit for?
MR. SANT AFEMIA: The permit is actually issued. It is to
correct the violations. Some of the walls were moved. Interior walls
were removed on the structure that had to be -- and that was done
without permit. So he has gotten a contractor to pull the permit and get
everything done correctly.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Anybody else?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I thought I saw a hand over on
this side.
Okay, if there are no other questions, then I'll close the public
hearing, entertain a motion or discussion.
MR. PONTE: I'll make a motion that we accept the stipulation as
read.
MR. LEFEBVRE: I'll second.
MR. DEAN: I'll second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We have the motion and a second.
All those in favor?
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed?
(N 0 response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Stipulated agreement stands as
read. Thank you.
MR. PATEL: Thank you.
MR. SANT AFEMIA: Thank you.
MS. ARNOLD: I think now we are at 4-C-15, which is BCC
versus Mrs. Ortiz. We do have two other stipulations that were added.
Page 56
161A ';(
November ~ 2007
And I'd rather do it after this particular case. And those are 4-C7 and
4-C-8.
(Speaker was duly sworn.)
MR. GANGULI: Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator
Rob Ganguli. Spelled G-A-N-G-U-L-I.
(Speaker and Interpreter were duly sworn.)
MS. MARKU: This is in reference to Code Enforcement Board
Case No. 2007-120, Department Case No. 2007-040560.
F or the record, I would like to state that the respondent is present.
The respondent and the board were sent a packet of evidence and
I would like to enter the packet of evidence as Exhibit A.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Entertain a motion.
MR. DEAN: I'll make the motion for Exhibit A.
MR. PONTE: Move to accept.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. LIESPERANCE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Opposed?
(No response.)
THE COURT REPORTER: Excuse me, I didn't get a second on
that one.
MR. KELLY: Motion, second.
MR. DEAN: I made the motion.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: He made the motion, and he
seconded.
MS. MARKU: Violation of Ordinances 2004-41, as amended,
the Collier County Land Development Code, Sections
1 0.02.06(B)(1 )(a), 1 0.02.06(B)(1)( e), and 1 0.02.06(B)(1)( e )(i).
Page 57
1611~ ~.
November 29',2007
Description of violation: Unpermitted erection of wooden
privacy fence, aluminum shade awning, and improvements including
electrical and plumbing made to lanai enclosure and kitchen.
Location/address where violation exists: 38 -- 2831 44th Terrace
Southwest, Naples, Florida, 34116.
Name and address of owner/person in charge of violation
location: Ortiz, Yunier E.
Date violation first observed: April 18th, 2007.
Date owner/person in charge given Notice of Violation: April
19th, 2007.
Date onlby which violation to be corrected: May 19th, 2007.
Date of reinspection: June 14th, 2007.
Results of reinspect ion: No permits applied for.
At this time I would like to turn the case over to Code
Enforcement Investigator Rob Ganguli.
MR. GANGULI: Good morning. I'd like to start out with there's
some question of the validity of this lady to represent the respondent.
Her status hasn't quite been established yet.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. So this is not Mrs. Ortiz?
MR. GANGULI: No, ma'am. Not as I understand her.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is she Mrs. Ortiz?
THE INTERPRETER: She says that she's the common law wife.
MR. DEAN: A what?
THE INTERPRETER: Common law wife. They're not legally
married.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Does she have a notified -- there
is a letter that is required from the individual that is being charged that
has to be --
MR. YBACET A: She says no. But if you need that, you can call
him on the phone and he can attest to it.
THE COURT REPORTER: May I have your full name, please?
THE INTERPRETER: Yesenia Moncada. Y-E-S-E-N-I-A. Last
Page 58
,! 6 I A 3
November 29,2007
name M-O-N-C-A-D-A.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Jean, should we give --
MS. RAWSON: We need some authorization from her that she
has his permission to represent him here today.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: She was saying that we could call
him on the phone and ask him. Would that work?
MS. RAWSON : Yes. Probably would have to have the inspector
do it.
MS. ARNOLD: Jean, I just would wonder who would recognize
that she's calling Mr. Ortiz. Because the investigator had indicated that
he wouldn't recognize his voice on the phone.
THE INTERPRETER: She's stated that every time hels gone over
to the house he's been the one thatls talked to her.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is that true?
MR. GANGULI: Yes, ma'am.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So she has been there every time?
MR. GANGULI: I can't testify to every time, but she has been
there in the past.
THE INTERPRETER: She has a driver's license that states that
she lives there.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Can we have her just say for the
record then she has permission?
MS. RAWSON: She can say for the record that she lives there
and that she has his authority to represent him here today.
And, you know, then if we find out later that that's not true, then
we'll have to deal with it. But if she puts that on the record.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, we need her to --
THE INTERPRETER: She has no problem giving that.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, she needs to make the
statement then. And I guess you can interpret it.
THE INTERPRETER: How would you like that?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We would like to say that she
Page 59
16 't~ ~
d'-'J
November 29,2007
lives there and that she has permission to represent Mr. Ortiz.
THE INTERPRETER: She lives there. She lives on that address,
and she has legal representation for it.
MS. ARNOLD: Could we ask where Mr. Ortiz is?
THE INTERPRETER: He's working in Texas.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Then I guess it would be kind of
hard to have him here. I guess weill proceed then. That's what we can
do. Thank you.
MR. GANGULI: Yes, ma'am. Okay, this involves Code
Enforcement Board Case No. 2007-120, Department Case No.
2007-040560.
The location ofthe violation is 2831 44th Terrace Southwest in
Golden Gate City, which is residentially zoned.
The description of the violation is it involves several unpermitted
improvements to the property. One is the erection of a wooden privacy
fence; the addition of an aluminum shade awning to the lanai;
structural improvements made to the lanai; and electrical and
plumbing improvements made to the lanai and kitchen areas.
THE INTERPRETER: No plumbing or electricity.
MR. GANGULI: This case originated from a call-in complaint
about unpermitted work.
On April 19th, 2007, Investigator Ed Morad and myself met with
the respondent who allowed an inspection of the property.
At this time we took photographic documentation, as well as
made explanations of the violation in English, and personal Notice of
Violation service was achieved.
Madam Chair, we don't have the luxury of an overhead projector
and I have several photographs I'd like to submit.
MR. KELLY: I make a motion we accept the photos.
MR. LEFEBVRE: If! second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. DEAN: Aye.&
Page 60
I61A ~
November 1'f, 2007
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed?
(No response.)
MR. GANGULl: Ma'am, I have a second copy of them, if you'd
like to pass them port and starboard in order to expedite this.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That would be great.
MR. GANGULI: I can describe each and every one of them as
rapidly or as slowly as you'd like. If you have any questions, I'll just
begin.
I-A depicts old fencing material with a new fence erected.
I-B represents the new fence itself.
2-A is the lanai enclosure with a shade awning addition.
2-B is the shade awning addition itself.
2-C is the county property appraiser's depiction of the property.
Am I going too fast for the board?
MR. DEAN: No, we're fine.
MR. GANGULl: 2-D is the property appraiser's aerial
photograph of the property configuration.
And 2-E is the same photograph with the area in question
highlighted.
3-A is the structural modification of doors.
3-B is the structural modification of windows.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Those arenlt listed in the charging
documents, are they, the doors and the windows?
MS. ARNOLD: He indicated other structural improvements.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay.
MR. GANGULl: Exhibits 4-A, Band C depict interior electrical
improvements to the lanai.
Page 61
1~"'1 A ~
~ovember z( 2007
Exhibits 4-D and E depict exterior electrical improvements to the
lanai.
THE INTERPRETER: Which numbers are those?
MR. GANGULI: 4-D and 4-E are exterior electrical
improvements.
4-F depicts electrical improvements in the kitchen.
THE INTERPRETER: She states that existing electricity was
there already.
MR. GANGULI: And lastly, 4-G depicts the plumbing
modifications in the kitchen.
THE INTERPRETER: She says that the -- on this last picture
what they removed was the cabinetry. This was the kitchen, but the
plumbing and everything else remained the same. They were just
removing the cabinetry.
MR. GANGULI: Proceed?
On June 29th, 2007, a meeting was held with the Collier County
permitting staff when the respondent was given requirements
necessary in order to retain the improvements made, as well as
demolition options.
THE INTERPRETER: The 1st of June?
MR. GANGULI: 29th of June.
This meeting was also attended by an architectural representative
for the respondent.
On September 13th, 2007, this case was prepared for the Code
Enforcement Board when my investigation revealed that no permits
had been applied for and attempts to contact the respondent for an
update on his progress were unsuccessful.
As of my final inspection conducted yesterday, November 28th,
2007, the violation remained.
I'd like to add to the record that the notice of this hearing was
posted on October 22nd, 2007, and that two days ago on November
27th, 2007, our secretary to the Code Enforcement Board received a
Page 62
~ir II '7
,J . Novenmer ~'2007
request for continuance. It was explained that this request could not be
considered unless it was received at least five business days prior to
the date set for this hearing.
And I'll withhold my recommendation until asked for.
THE INTERPRETER: Could you repeat that, please, so I can --
and slower.
MR. GANGULI: The notice ofthis hearing was posted on
October 22nd, 2007. Two days ago, on November 27th, 2007.
THE INTERPRETER: What date was that?
MR. GANGULl: Two days ago, November 27th, 2007.
Our secretary to the Code Enforcement Board, Bendisa, received
a request for a continuance. And it was explained that the request
could not be considered unless it was received at least five business
days prior to the date set for the hearing.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: He is going to wait for his
recommendation until afterwards, so it's her turn to speak,
THE INTERPRETER: She didn't know that at the time when
they tore down the fence and put it up that they needed a permit.
What they were doing is taking out the old fence and putting in a
new fence.
And the next page, the pictures. This is the new fence that they've
put up.
She also stated that on the first page the fence that you see in the
background is actually not hers.
So the next packet, 2-A, this used to be a screened lanai and what
she did was she closed it in and put in windows and altered it. And
they made a terrace portion of it. You can see that on 2- B.
They have hired an architect that is working on putting together
permits for this, submitting to Collier County for it.
And in the kitchen there was no changes in plumbing or
electricity. It was just changing out the cabinetry, which they want to
install new cabinetry.
Page 63
161A 3
November 29,2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Question for her, then. Can she
explain the picture 4-B?
THE INTERPRETER: 4-B?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Urn-hum.
THE INTERPRETER: She states that if you look at the
receptacle towards the bottom, she says that that receptacle was there
already. What she had added were from the same line done by an
electrical technician. They've added the --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Explain to her that is an electrical
change without a permit.
THE INTERPRETER: Yes.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Would you please explain that to
her.
THE INTERPRETER: I'm sorry . Yes.
She understands that. This is not on the kitchen, though.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: But itls saying lanai and kitchen.
I'm just going through -- I believe the kitchen in question, the
electrical, is 4-F.
MR. GANGULI: Madam Chairman, that is correct.
THE INTERPRETER: The sheetrock that you saw on that photo
that went through the inside, from when they took out the door that led
to the lanai, this portion stayed, so thatls where you see this. This is
actually an existing.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Existing electrical?
THE INTERPRETER: Yes.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: But exposed.
THE INTERPRETER: But exposed, yes.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And it does look like on 4-G that
they possibly removed the cabinets, and the plumbing was existing.
THE INTERPRETER: She says yes, that is the old stuff.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. I will--
THE INTERPRETER: She's asking, do you need a permit to
Page 64
r~" ~.... ~
~vember 29, 2007
change the cabinetry?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes. It's any modifications, as I
understand it. Donlt you, Michelle?
MS. ARNOLD: I don't believe to change out their cabinets they
wouldn't have to get a --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: But they didn't just change out
cabinets, they did windows, walls.
MS. ARNOLD: Well, I believe the person coming in will get a
permit to do everything. I mean, had they just done a simple change
out the cabinet, then it wouldnlt be -- but because of all of the --
THE INTERPRETER: She understands that.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay.
THE INTERPRETER: She understands that now.
She says on the inside when she moved the cabinetry, because
there was __ it was an infestation of roaches. She feels that for the
kitchen she doesn't think that she needed a permit. But for the fence
portion of it too, she didn't know that when you changed out a fence
needed to pull a permit.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. I look to your
recommendations, I guess. Or wait a minute. I guess we'd better close
the -- do we have any questions?
MR. DEAN: I have one.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Go ahead.
MR. DEAN: Would you translate to the young lady that the
reason we have permits for electrical and plumbing is to save the joy
that just left the room that was in her arms. We've read stories and we
have copies of stories of fires, and that's why welre strict on what we
do with the permits. Especially for electrical.
THE INTERPRETER: Okay, thank you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions?
MR. KELLY: I just want to know if there's a permit on the house
at all, any type of permit. Like did they do all of this work without any
Page 65
l~IA 3
November 29, 2007
permit at all?
MR. GANGULI: There was originally a permit for a lanai
enclosure from 1990. It was drawn by a property owner previous to
this one. And it was c.O.ld. I believe the photographs depict this work
has taken place past 1990.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Anybody else?
MR. LEFEBVRE: Yes, I do.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay.
MR. LEFEBVRE: The current is -- I saw a lot of wood and so
forth. Has any of this been finished?
THE INTERPRETER: No, it has not been finished. It's as is.
What you see is what it is now.
MS. ARNOLD: But she needs to obtain a permit to finish it, so--
MR. LEFEBVRE: Right, I understand. But I was wondering if it
was moved along or if the project has stopped.
THE INTERPRETER: She's stating that right now she's in the
process of getting a permit. But depending on how much it cost,
especially with impact fees and everything else, that she might opt just
to remove everything and put as is, or as it was.
MR. LEFEBVRE: What I'm worried about is there's a lot of
exposed wiring in the status that it is.
THE INTERPRETER: She had an electrician do all the work, all
the electrical work, she says.
MR. LEFEBVRE: But what I'm worried about, ifthere's any
power to these outlets and so forth, with a baby in the house.
THE INTERPRETER: She says that right now, no. Some of it is,
some of it isn't. It's disconnected.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, if not, I'll close the public
hearing, look for a finding of fact. Do I hear a motion?
MS. ARNOLD: Would you like to hear the county's
Page 66
'1) ~ I' '.'
-~ \_,,~ I rr;J
November 29,2007 '>
recommendation?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Not until after we --
MS. ARNOLD: Okay.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: They wanted to wait until after
they got the finding of fact.
MS. ARNOLD: Sorry.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I started to do it that way and I got
-- so --
MR. LEFEBVRE: I'd like to make a motion that there is a
violation.
MR. KELL Y: I'll second it.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have a motion and a second. All
those in favor?
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We have found that there was or
is a violation. And we'll now look to the county for their
recommendation.
MR. GANGULI: Ma'am, my recommendation is that the Code
Enforcement Board order the respondent to pay all operational costs
incurred in the prosecution ofthis case in the amount of$338.93
within 30 days of this hearing.
THE INTERPRETER: How much is that?
MR. GANGULI: $338.93.
THE INTERPRETER: $338.93.
MR. GANGULI: Within 30 days.
Page 67
, r fi!
.'. ' Ii.. f,
No~e~ber ~~, 2~7
And abate all violations by obtaining a Collier County building
permit, all required inspections and certificate of occupancy within 90
days of this hearing.
THE INTERPRETER: 90 days?
MR. GANGULI: Yes.
Or a fine of $200 a day will be imposed.
THE INTERPRETER: $200 a day?
MR. GANGULI: $200 a day will be imposed for each day any
violation remains.
THE INTERPRETER: 90 days to finish it or $200 a day?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Correct.
MR. GANGULI: C.O.'d within 90 days or a fine of $200 a day.
Or by obtaining a Collier County demolition permit, all required
inspections and certificate of completion, and restoring the structure to
its originally permitted condition within 90 days of this hearing or a
fine of $200 a day will be imposed for each day any violation remains.
And lastly, the respondent must notify code enforcement when
the violation has been abated in order to conduct a final inspection to
confirm abatement.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you.
Comments from the board as far as how they want to proceed?
MR. KELLY: I like the county's recommendation. I think the
time frame and the amount of the fines are appropriate.
MR. MORGAN: Second.
MR. KELLY: That was my comment, but I'll make that into a
motion. I make a motion we accept the county's order.
MR. MORGAN: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
Page 68
161 A 3
November 29,2007
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Stands as the county stated.
So that's what she has to do. Does she understand all that?
THE INTERPRETER: Yes.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you.
THE INTERPRETER: You're welcome.
MR. GANGULI: Thank you for your patience.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is the next case 2007-l13?
MS. ARNOLD: One, one --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Three and four? 112 and 113.
(Speakers were duly sworn.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Are we ready?
MR. BALDWIN: Board of County Commissioners, Collier
County Florida versus 10bani Gonzalez. We have entered into a
stipulation agreement.
The undersigned 10bani Gonzales on behalf of himself has
represented for the respondent and entered into a stipulation and
agreement with Collier County as the resolution of notices of violation
ofthe recurring violation in reference to the original Case No.
2006-110054, dated the 2nd day of November, 2006.
The violations noted in the referenced Notice of Violation are
accurate and I stipulate to their existence. The violations are of section
2005-44 of the litter, weeds and exotics ordinance and are described as
litter consisting of but not limited to vehicle parts, assorted wood,
metals, plastics, et cetera.
Therefore, is it is agreed between the parties that the respondent
shall pay the operational costs in the amount of $301.41 that incurred
in the prosecution of this case.
As of yesterday, November 28th, 2006 (sic) the violation was
Page 69
['fI'.
A 3
IC:
November 29,2007
abated.
And number three, Collier County would give 60 days from this
hearing -- from the date of this hearing to pay the operational costs of
the 301.41.
And we have down here respondent must notify the Code
Enforcement when the violation has been abated. But again, I was out
at the property yesterday and the violation has been abated.
MR. LIESPERANCE: May I make a note that you meant
yesterday, 2007, this year.
MR. BALDWIN: Yes.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do you understand the stipulated
agreement, that you have to pay the operational costs?
Do we have any questions or comments?
MR. LEFEBVRE: Was the operational cost to be paid within--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Sixty days.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Within 60, okay.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And ifthere's no questions or
other comments, then I'll close the public hearing and look to entertain
a motion.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Make a motion to accept the stipulated
agreement.
MR. MORGAN: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
Page 70
'1' l' A
. "~.J' , 3
".~-' .:,.....
November 29, 2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you.
And for his next case?
(All speakers were duly sworn.)
MR. BALDWIN: Board of County Commissioners, Collier
County, Florida, versus Jobani Gonzalez. CEB No. 2007-113.
Department No. 2007-051073.
The county's entered into a stipulation agreement with Mr.
Gonzalez. He's here to represent himself.
Respondent entered into the stipulation agreement with Collier
County as the resolution of notice of violations for the repeat violation
that was previously adjudicated on April 26th, 2007 by the Code
Enforcement Board, our reference Case No. 2006-11055. And that
was dated the 2nd day of November, 2006.
The violations noted in the reference -- referenced notice of
violation are accurate, and I stipulate to their existence.
The violation is that of Sections 2.02.03, prohibited uses ofthe
Collier County Land Development Code and are described as the
owner storing vehicles, dump trucks not belonging to anyone residing
on the Estates-zoned property, and owner using the Estates-zoned
property for storage in a mechanics shop which is not an allowable use
for the zoning district.
Therefore, the both parties agreed upon: Number one, pay
operational costs in the amount of 455.40 incurred in the prosecution
of the case.
And two, the respondent would abate all violations. He must
cease and desist using the property for storage of vehicles and the
mechanic shop. Owner must use this property only as allowed under
the Land Development Code.
Owner shall comply by removing all stored vehicles or
equipment within three business days ofthis hearing or a fine of $300
a day will be imposed until the violation is abated.
B, if the violation is not abated by the end of the third business
Page 71
16 I' '::~
November 29, 2007
day, the Collier County Code Enforcement may hire a licensed
contractor to remove the commercial vehicles and may obtain
assistance from the Collier County Sheriffs Department, and all costs
of abatement will be assessed to the property owner, including a daily
fine.
e, Collier County to impose a fine of $100 a day commencing
from July 31 st, 2007 for the repeat violation of prohibited uses of
Section 2.02.03, specifically the storage of commercial vehicles, until
October 11th, 2007 for a total of71 days. That equals $7,100.
But Collier County will reduce the total amount of the $7,100 to a
totalof$2,500.
D, the respondent must notify the code enforcement investigator
when the violation has been abated in order to conduct the final
inspection to confirm abatement within 24 hours.
And E, Collier County will give 60 days from the date of this
hearing for the total payment of $2,500 plus operational costs of
$455.40, equaling $2,955.40 to be paid.
And the violation has been abated as of right now. But the
problem with this property was commercial vehicles kept coming back
to the property, so I would still like to after three business days go out
and conduct my final investigation.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have a question for Jean. Only
because we've never done a case where we've gone without an actual
charging document. I mean, I know itls a repeat, but they're going
back to their -- have we ever done that before, and is that allowed?
MS. RAWSON: We've done several repeat violations.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Repeat violations, yes, we usually
up the fines from that time frame but we don't go back to the original
date that --
MS. RAWSON: No, we donlt.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I donlt think welve done that
before, have we?
Page 72
<CJ} {' ~~,;
NO;~~b~r ~~, 2J
MS. RAWSON: We have not.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Are we allowed to do that?
Because there's no charging document to -- I mean, there was no case
at that point. It was abated and now this is a new case. So there was no
standing case.
MS. RAWSON: I understand. I think what I heard him -- the
inspector just say, that the violation has now been abated.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Again. It was abated before, but
they're wanting to charge him $100 a day from July 31 st of 2007 to
October 11th because he was in violation during those time frames.
MS. RAWSON: I don't think that they're going to charge him
that unless there's another violation.
MS. ARNOLD: Let me just -- the statute allows you to go back--
once you've adjudicated a case -- and I was asking the investigator for
the prior order. So this is a repeat violation.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I know it's a repeat. We usually
just up the fines.
MS. ARNOLD: Right. But the statute allows for you to go back
to the date that the violation reoccurred and charge from that date until
it's been abated.
I think the recommendation is to -- although you could do that
7,100, the county's requesting that you charge a penalty for the repeat
violation of 2,500.
MR. BALDWIN: And actually, the case was reopened a month
after, after four -- it was adjudicated on 4/26/2007. I received -- well,
the county received an anonymous complaint in May, a month later,
that the case opened up.
But I did not get on the property to inspect the commercial
vehicles on the property until 7/31 of 107. And I was on the property
with my supervisor and Collier County Sheriffs Department. And we
could confirm that the trucks on the property were not belonging to
anyone residing on the property.
Page 73
'~r: ;(~
Novembe; 29,4073
And I have photos from 7/31 to 10/11 of '07 when those vehicles
were removed. And that was 71 days. And so it's actually the 71 days
from when I could actually prove that the trucks were on the property.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I just wanted to make sure we--
MS. RAWSON: No, that's fine. That's permissible.
Did he sign a stipulated agreement to this?
MR. BALDWIN: Yes.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Do we have any other
questions?
MR. PONTE: Yeah, I don't really understand the rationale about
dropping the fine, I guess, from $7,100 to $2,500. What's the reason
for this generous negotiated reduction?
MR. BALDWIN: The county's reasoning for the reduction is that
on 7/31 finally we learned that the owner did not actually live in the
house 7/31/07. He was not living in the house, he was living
somewhere.
Up until that time for the previous year and a half we were told
by the people living in the house who were on the deed at one time
that he was living in the house and he just would not either call me
back or return any of my phone calls.
So the county is giving him a little leeway in this. And then from
7/31 he still had until October 11th to abate the violation, and so those
are the 71 days that we were concerned about.
MR. PONTE: Thank you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, ifnot, first let me ask,
Jobani, do you understand the stipulated agreement?
MR. GONZALEZ: Yes.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Did you understand you're not
allowed to do this?
MR. GONZALEZ: I'm not living in the house. But it's in my
Page 74
,..... ,
16 'i: .~
November 29, 2007
name, so I have to pay.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. No other questions, I'll
close the public hearing and move to the board for either discussion or
a motion.
MR. KELLY: I make a motion that we accept the county's
recommendation.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Are we finished with
stipulated agreements, I believe?
MS. ARNOLD: We're finished with stipulations and agreements.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We've got six hearings. Do we
want to get through those and then maybe break for lunch? And then
we'll go back to the Blocker case, ifthat's okay with them?
MS. ARNOLD: I think that Patrick's okay with us hearing all the
other cases prior to --
MR. WHITE: I agree with that and had asked Michelle on our
break, thank you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, so then I guess the first
case we need to hear is Board of County Commissioners versus E's
Country Store.
MS. ARNOLD: Correct.
MS. MARKU: This is in reference to Code Enforcement Board
Page 75
.., 6 '
, .. .,
l "'Ii
kq '2
""."
November 29,2007
Case No. 2007-96, Department Case No. 2006-120386.
F or the record, I would like to find out if the respondent is
present?
MR. SNOW: The respondent was here earlier, he is not here
now.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I don't think I understand why.
MR. SNOW: We'll clear it up.
MS. MARKU: The respondent and the board has received a
packet of evidence and I would like to enter the packet of evidence as
Exhibit A.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Make a motion to accept the package.
MR. PONTE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
MS. MARKU: Violation of Ordinances 04-41, Collier County
Land Development Code, as amended, Sections 5.06.04(C)(8)(B),
5.06.04(C)(8)(C), 5.06.04(C)(8)(D) and 5.06.04(C)(8)(E).
Description of violation: Sign installed without obtaining proper
permits, and did not obtain all inspections and CO, certificate of
completion, within 60 days of after-the-fact permit issuance.
Location/address where violation exists: 14344 Immokalee Road.
Folio 76422000065.
Name and address of owner/person in charge of violation
location: E's Country Store, LLC. Burton Eisenbud, as registered
Page 76
1~6 fir '3
November 29, 2007
agent for 21246C Clubhouse Drive, Boca Raton, Florida, 33434.
Date violation first observed: December 12th, 2006.
Date owner/person in charge given notice of violation: April 7th,
2007.
Date on/by which violation to be corrected: April 30th, 2007.
Date of reinspection: August 10th, 2007.
Results of reinspection: The violation has been abated. The
respondent has also paid the operational costs incurred in the case.
MS. ARNOLD: I just want to correct that at the time, the August
10th '07, the violation remained, but the last reinspection was
when? Yesterday?
MR. SNOW: Yes, ma'am.
MS. ARNOLD: Yesterday, September 28th (sic), and at that time
the violation was abated.
(All speakers were duly sworn.)
MR. SNOW: For the record, Investigator Kitchell Snow, Collier
County Code Enforcement.
We request that a finding of fact that there was a violation on the
property issued. This was a sign without a permit. They were required
to get all inspections through certificate of completion within 60 days
of permit issuance.
The permit was issued on 5/23 -- I'm sorry, 5/30/2007. The CO
came at 10/10/2007, so there were a little bit past their time frame.
He did come in, they have complied. The violation is abated.
They have paid operational cost. And I guess Mr. Eisenbud didn't feel
he needed to be here anymore from that, so that's where we're at.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. Any questions?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Ifnot, close the public hearing,
look for a finding of fact.
MR. KELLY: I'll make a motion that a violation did exist.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Second.
Page 77
'11~ .~
.& 6 i g', ~
".
November 29, 2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And as there are no fines incurred
because operational costs have already been paid, that concludes it.
MR. SNOW: Thank you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you.
The next one would be Board of County Commissioners versus
Emma Houston.
MS. MARKU: This is in reference to Code Enforcement Board
Case No. 2007-114. Department Case No. 2007-07-0595.
F or the record, I would like to ask if the respondent is present?
The respondent is present.
(All speakers were duly sworn.)
MS. MARKU: The respondent and the board is in receipt of
packet of evidence and I would like to enter the packet of evidence as
Exhibit A.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have a motion?
MR. PONTE: Move to accept.
MR. DEAN: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
Page 78
1 ~f' A ~
November 29,2007
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
MS. MARKU: Violation of ordinances 2004-41, as amended, the
Collier County Land Development Code, Sections 4.02.01(A), Table
2.1, 1 0.02.06(B)(l )(A), 1 0.02.06(B)(l )(E), 1 0.02.06(B)(l )(E)(I), and
Sections 105.1 of the Florida Building Code 2004 Edition.
Description of violation: Two mobile homes on property which
are approximately 18 to 24 inches from the rear property line in
violation of setback requirements.
Also, both mobile homes have been illegally converted from
single-family units to multi-family without proper permits, and both
mobile homes also have additions which are unpermitted.
Location/address where violation exists: 415 South Third Street,
Immokalee, Florida.
Name and address of owner/person in charge of violation
location: Emma Houston, P.O. Box 1275, Immokalee, Florida.
Date violation first observed: July 18th, 2007.
Date owner/person in charge given Notice of Violation: August
8th, 2007.
Date onlby which violation to be corrected: September 21 st,
2007.
Date of reinspection: September 21 st, 2007.
Results of reinspection: No corrective action taken.
For the record, I would like to state that a couple days ago I
spoke with Ms. Houston and she requested a continuance of the case,
and I stated that due to not being sufficient time and timely manner I
could not accept that continuance.
At this time, I would like to turn the case over to investigator
John Santafemia.
Page 79
1'6' f H~ ~
,-;fl"
November 29,2007
MR. SANTAFEMIA: For the record, John Santafemia,
S_A_N_T_A_F_E_M_I_A, Property Maintenance Specialist for Collier
County Code Enforcement.
MS. ARNOLD: I don't know if the board before going through
this wants to hear why Ms. Houston wants to do a continuance.
Because she approached me out in the hall so --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Actually, she wasn't granted the
right to one.
MS. ARNOLD: Well, I think you can consider one here. We just
couldn't do it --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Through your channels?
MS. ARNOLD: Right.
MR. LEFEBVRE: We didn't accept it on the last case, which,
same situation, there was a request for continuance, and --
MR. L'ESPERANCE: I think we should still hear her request,
though.
MS. RAWSON: I think what happened on the last case, there
was no objection because the person was here. I think they can't
accept the continuance unless they get it five days in advance, in all
fairness to you.
But we have people here that come and stand before you and say
please give me a continuance and you grant them. So I think you
should probably hear her.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'll go ahead, John, before you
start, and we'll go ahead and see what she has.
MS. HOUSTON: Thank you. I'm put in a position that not only
am I put into, but I have met the code enforcement at my place
because of a tenant. And she was three months behind in rent and she
called the code enforcement.
And at that time I just happened to be on the premises when he
checked her house. And that's when I was -- you know, with him. And
it was weeks after that I got a paper after he give me the things to
Page 80
10 1#1 ~
November 29,1007
correct, I went ahead and did it, which went into about 4,000 and
some dollars of my money, which -- you know, personal money.
And then when it come to this, I had like that case confusing also
with a lot of paperwork with this case and another case which was in
Fort Myers, all because ofthe divorce that I have this property.
I didn't do this, but I'm accused of this. And I did not know that
the hearing that I'm attending today was at this impact. I got to sit with
him today and find out, you know, about the setback. I know he said
that I was not -- you know, didn't have a permit.
So then I needed representation, and the papers that I have did
not do any measurements or whatever because I'm not familiar with
these things. So then I did not -- the person that was supposed to come
this morning, they could not come because they didn't have coverage
at their office. So I am in a position.
If! have to go on with this, I must, but I am not ready. But that's
what I'm saying this morning. And I got into this through a divorce,
and this was part of what the judge give me, because it was not
agreement. And I'm knowledge about now that these things are not
permittable. This is my inheritance of my divorce, why I'm standing
here today.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So in giving you a continuance,
what is that going to allow you to do?
MS. HOUSTON: It allows me to get some legal representation
and get some checking back and measurements and to make sure that I
am knowing what I'm doing. Because right now I do not know what
I'm doing, okay. And I'm not -- and I don't have any representation.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: What's the county's stance for
delaying this until January?
MR. SANTAFEMIA: Well--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And allowing her to get legal
representation?
MR. SANT AFEMIA: I don't necessarily oppose a continuance. I
Page 81
"fJ #
rrv
. ('"
J. If'I '
November 29,2007
,
understand her situation. She does have several issues. This case was
actually brought to my attention through an investigation into a
property maintenance minimum housing issue. So she does have a lot
of things going on this property.
Where I kind of part company with her a little bit is that she has
had a lot of time already to work on this problem, to start something
on this problem.
I know you got a copy of my Notice of Violation in your packet.
If you look at it, the supplementals are very specific about what she
needs to do. The first line in my order to correct states that she needs
to hire a licensed professional to help her with this problem. She has
done -- to my knowledge has done none ofthat.
She did inform me today that she did hire somebody, a
contractor, but -- and there was some confusion about what case she
was working on.
My concern is that if you give her a continuance that nothing's
going to come of it. But it is your choice and I don't necessarily
oppose it.
MS. ARNOLD: My request is that because there has been an
issue with Ms. Houston picking up her mail, so if you do get notice
from the post office that you have mail from the county, if you could
go ahead and do that. And I would request that notice be waived for
the next meeting so that we don't have an issue with future notice.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions, comments
from the board?
MR. PONTE: I don't see we have any option whatsoever. If
someone requests legal representation, they must be granted.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'll entertain a motion then for a
continuance until the January meeting, with the stipulation that you
waive your right to notice, which means you know you have to be
here.
MS. HOUSTON: Yes, I will.
Page 82
16'1 /lrt ~
MovenllJer 29;'2007
And may I add, I have stayed in Collier County for over 40 years,
and I have had notices, and I always show up and am responsible.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm just letting you know that we
won't be sending you a notice. We're just telling you right now that if
we grant this and vote on it, that you will have your continuance and it
will be in the January meeting.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Which is what day?
MS. RAWSON: 24th.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The 24th of January.
MR. PONTE: And at a different location.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Right, it will be at the courthouse,
I believe.
MS. ARNOLD: It will be downtown.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So we have a motion. Do I have a
second?
MR. DEAN: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
MR. LEFEBVRE: Opposed.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The next case would be Board of
County Commissioners versus Stanley Fogg, Jr. and Theresa M. Fogg.
MS. MARKU: This is Code Enforcement Board Case No.
2007-115, Department Case No. 2007-040776.
F or the record, the respondent is present.
The respondent and the board were sent a packet of evidence and
I would like to enter the packet of evidence as Exhibit A.
Page 83
]6
November 29, 2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Entertain a motion.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Make a motion to accept.
MR. PONTE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
(All speakers were duly sworn.)
MS. MACALISTER: For the record, I would just like to add that
my name is Colleen MacAlister, and I'm here today as representative
for Mr. Fogg. We'll both be speaking this morning.
Madam clerk, my name is C-O-L-L-E-E-N, M-A-C-A-L-I-S-T-E-R.
And as I came in late, I apologize that we don't have an
additional supplemental packet for you.
MS. MARKU: Violation of ordinances 2004-41, as amended,
Section 2.02.03 of the Collier County Land Development Code.
Description of violation: Sheds being sold on agricultural zoned
property .
Location/address where violation exists: 10270 Immokalee Road,
Naples, Florida, 34120.
Name and address of owner/person in charge of violation
location: Stanley Fogg, Jr. and Theresa M. Fogg, 6151 Everett Street,
Naples, Florida, 34112.
Date violation first observed: April 23rd, 2007.
Date owner/person in charge given Notice of Violation: June
19th, 2007.
Page 84
161A 3
November 29,2007
Date onlby which violation to be corrected. July 19th, 2007.
Date of reinspect ion: July 19th, 2007.
Results of reinspection: Violation remains.
At this time I would like to turn the case over to Code
Enforcement Investigator Michelle Scavone.
MS. SCAVONE: For the record, Collier County Code
Enforcement Investigator Michelle Scavone.
This case is in reference to Department Case No. 2007-04-0776.
Violation of the Ordinance 2004-41, as amended, Section 2.02.03 of
the Collier County Land Development Code, selling of sheds on
agriculturally zoned property.
This case was started as an anonymous complaint on March 9th,
2007 for displaying sheds on the front property off of Immokalee
Road and should not be displaying anything.
April 23rd, 2007, a site visit was made. It was observed that
sheds were being displayed on the agriculturally zoned property,
approximately 15 or more.
Extensive research was done and the owner was contacted.
Mr. Fogg admitted the sales of the shed and insisted that he could sell
them on his agriculturally zoned land. It was expressed to Mr. Fogg
that he would need a zoning verification letter to clarify land use, and
time was granted for him to get the verification letter.
June 19th, 2007, still no letter had been obtained, so personal
service ofthe Notice of Violation was served to Mr. Fogg at the
Immokalee Road address.
June 22nd, 2007, a copy of the verification letter was obtained.
And I'd like to submit that into evidence.
MR. KELLY: Make a motion we accept the packet.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
Page 85
16 J.( 0
November 29, 2007
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MS. SCAVONE: In that letter, it was concluded by Ross
Gochenaur, the planning manager of the zoning and land development
review department, that regarding the sale of prefabricated sheds as an
accessory use to Fogg's Retail Nursery, the sale of prefabricated sheds
is not considered a valid accessory use to the principal use of a retail
plant nursery and is therefore prohibited on the property, therefore, not
to be considered an accessory to the retail plant nursery.
September 10th, 2007, I obtained some pictures, and would like
to enter them into the evidence as County Exhibit B.
MR. KELL Y: I make a motion we accept the Exhibit B.
MR. DEAN: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
MS. ARNOLD: I think that would be C. The second one was B
and then this is C.
MS. SCAVONE: Okay. The first picture is just of the sign
showing that it's Fogg's, and that sheds are that way, the display of the
sheds.
The second picture is the sheds on the property. And the third is a
Page 86
161i~ ~~
November 2(2007
different angle of the sheds on that same property.
As of this present date the violation remains. And I would like to
enter into evidence the County's exhibit for the last picture. Are we on
D now?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear a motion to accept the
packet?
MR. KELLY: Motion to accept.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
MS. SCAVONE: The sheds are still for sale on the agricultural
zoned property in violation of Collier County Land Development
Code.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Madam Chair, I'm going to recuse myself
from voting on this particular case. The counsel is involved with a
legal issue that I'm also involved in. So I'm going to recuse myself
from voting.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's fine. You'll have to get
with Jean to get a paper that you need to fill out and then you return it,
I believe, to Cherie'.
Okay. Ready to hear from you.
MS. MACALISTER: Thank you. I think part ofthe issue here is
the interpretation ofthe Land Development Code. When Mr. -- and I
apologize in advance if! slaughter this gentleman's name -- Mr.
Page 87
16 Lo~em~ 29, 2007
Gochenaur issued his letter, I think he took some rather casual-- he
chose a rather casual definition of the retail sales ordinance section of
the Land Development Code.
What the code actually says under retail plant nurseries subject to
the following conditions is: Retail sales shall be limited primarily to
the sale of plants, decorative products, such as mulch or stone,
fertilizers, pesticides and other products and tools accessory to or
required for the planing and maintenance of said plants.
Mr. Fogg's position is that storage sheds are an integral part of
the maintenance accessories to any plant maintenance regime. I don't
have statistics on how many sheds are sold for other purposes in
Collier County but my guess is most of them house mulch, dirt, rakes,
et cetera.
I think the other thing about the letter is that he takes the
interpretation that they are intended for much more than general use.
Well, a lot of agricultural products have multiple uses. And again, he
says that sheds are not mentioned.
Well, if you look at the Land Development Code ordinance itself,
neither are rakes, neither are hoes, and yet no one would take issue
with the fact that hoes and rakes are accessories or other products
necessary to maintenance of plants in agricultural use.
I have asked the county for any precedent that would support an
interpretation that sheds are a prohibited use.
I would also point out that the Land Development Code, where it
wants to prohibit something, has specifically prohibited it, namely, the
sale of large power equipment, such as lawn mowers, tractors and the
like shall not be permitted in association with a retail plant nursery in
the rural agricultural district. So where the commissioners chose to
limit the application, they have done so specifically.
I think that in this particular case the planning department simply
took a position that because it wasn't dirt and it wasn't mulch, it wasn't
an appropriate item for sale in a retail agricultural environment,
Page 88
161 " I~
November 29;1'007
.....
,.
without any real fundamental justification for tht position other than
well, we just don't think it is.
And I would suggest that, as I said, most storage sheds in Collier
County house rakes, tools, hose, dirt, mulch and pots for plants.
We have some photos -- and again, I apologize that we had them late
__ that Mr. Fogg took. And they show--
MR. FOGG: You want me to just show them all that?
MS. MACALISTER: Yeah, why don't I let him --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: First get a motion to accept your
pictures as your first exhibit.
MR. DEAN: Motion to accept.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: But I think the county wants to
look at them first, right?
(Speaker was duly sworn.)
MR. DANTINI: I might object to the -- what are the pictures of?
MR. FOGG: They're pictures of sheds used in an agricultural
operation, including my own.
MR. DANTINI: Not the sheds on your property?
MR. FOGG: One of the -- yes, two of them are on my property.
And then I showed some examples of other nurseries and agricultural
operations right in the local area that also have sheds also.
MR. DANTINI: I object to the pictures, because they don't
represent the sale of the sheds from his property. It has --
MR. FOGG: They represent the evidence that a shed is an
accessory use to agricultural operation. That's what they --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'll note your exception, but we
have a motion on the floor. I believe there was one.
MR. DEAN: I made the motion.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: He made the motion. We need a
second to accept the packet as their --
MR. DANTINI: I'm sorry.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I have a second?
Page 89
1~ i A 3
Nove~er 29, 2007
MR. LEFEBVRE: I make the second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. We will note your
exception.
MS. MACALISTER: I might point out to the board that Mr.
Fogg has been a retailer on Immokalee Road for 20 years, 10 years in
another location on Immokalee Road and 10 years in this location,
without any code violations.
He made a business decision that sheds were an appropriate item
to sell to customers that he's selling plants, rakes, mulch and other
agricultural plant products to. And he made that decision based on the
experience that that is what most people buy a shed for.
And I think the county has sort of stepped in here and decided to
define business purposes of something that is a retail operation that is
allowed under Land Development Code.
I might also say that I think the operative word in the Land
Development Code is maintenance of said plants. And I think there's
no doubt that sheds are an integral part of the maintenance of plants
that you buy in any setting.
MR. FOGG: I'd like to give a couple of examples today, if! may.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Speak into the microphone more directly,
please.
MR. FOGG: I'd like to give a couple of examples of that, if!
may.
Page 90
16" A ~
~vember 29, i007
The Collier County agricultural extension has two sheds or
outbuildings. The Florida Department of Agriculture on Randall has
three sheds on their property, zoned -- these are agricultural
operations.
Pelican Nursery has sheds, Ray's Lawn and Gardens has a shed.
A lot of operations, I have sheds for my operation. It's a bona fide
accessory. And that's my point. It's definitely a bona fide accessory. It
does not state anywhere in the law that a shed is not. And that's --
MR. DANTINI: May I intervene on that one?
First of all, I don't believe that they were selling their sheds on their
properties; that they had placed them on there, but they weren't for
sale.
The second thing, the county does not -- did not just pick
something out of the sky and say the sheds aren't part of this -- the
problem here, it says under the standard industrial classification code
on No. 5211 that prefab sheds are a building -- buildings including
sheds are identified under the SIC Code 5211 that are sold under
lumber and other building material dealers. And it doesn't have
anything to do with nurseries.
And that's a Bible they go by as far as land use on a lot of their
decisions.
MS. MACALISTER: I am not aware, is that incorporated by
reference into our Land Development Code, the standard industrial
classifications?
MR. DANTINI: That is something that they use for reference.
MS. MACALISTER: I understand that. But is it technically
legally part of our Land Development Code as a basis for making
decisions under our Land Development Code?
MR. DANTINI: I'm not a planner so I can't answer that.
MS. MACALISTER: I'm just not aware that it is, so I'm not
aware how relevant that classification is to the discussion here. I think
we need to look to the language that we have before us that was
Page 91
Vy[ "JJ ~
N6'v~mbe; 19, 2!f11J7
provided by the county.
MS. RAWSON : You've got to look at the statute as it's written,
the ordinance as it's written.
MR. LEFEBVRE: When Mr. Ponte gets done with that letter, can
I please review that again?
MR. FOGG: If I may, we're under the agricultural ordinance, not
industrial ordinance.
MR. DEAN: Can I ask one question? Are some of these sheds
permanent buildings?
MR. FOGG: No.
MR. DEAN: None of them are permanent?
MR. FOGG: On my property I have two permanent sheds which
I'm using myself. The other ones are not permanent. They're loaded on
a truck and they're sold places like I was describing.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The pictures that he showed us of
the other nurseries are permanent structures.
MS. MACALISTER: If you would like the precise language of
the statute to look at -- ordinance, I have it here.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes, please. Could I have that as
MR. KELL Y: Make a motion we accept the Exhibit B from the
respondent.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear a second?
MR. LEFEBVRE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Page 92
No~e~lr 2~, 2J
MR. DANTIN!: We have no objection.
MS. SCAVONE: May I -- I just wanted to quote in the letter -- I
don't know if everyone has gotten a chance to read it or not -- that it
says, such prefabricated buildings are not directly related to growing
and maintaining plants, and although they may be used for storage of
tools and equipment related to growing and maintaining plants, they
are not intended for much more of general use. So therefore, their
sales would not be considered an accessory use to retail plant nursery.
MS. MACALISTER: And of course that is precisely what I just
took issue with, which is that the code doesn't require that they be
directly related, it requires that they be an accessory to. And that was
why I said I thought that the interpretation of the actual ordinance was
really casual by the planning department.
MS. ARNOLD: Can I just interject to something here? If there's
a question with regard to the written interpretation that's been
presented, there is a process afforded to the public to request a formal
interpretation, and then if they disagree with that interpretation, it's
appealable to the Board of County Commissioners.
I don't know if it's correct for the Code Enforcement Board to be
interpreting the code. It's left to the zoning department to do that, and
that's the process that exists currently.
MS. RAWSON: That's precisely what you're being asked to do.
Ms. MacAlister's legal argument is that basically that that's the wrong
interpretation of the statute, that the statute doesn't specifically
prohibit this. In other instances when they mean to prohibit something,
they say it.
This is a legal interpretation of an ordinance, which is really
probably beyond your purview. You can't really find that there's a
violation existing unless you are sure what the statute means.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Correct. So --
MS. RAWSON: And I don't know that you can be the ones to
interpret the statute without some more --
Page 93
..-"
16bl A "2
Novem er 11J, 20if7
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It says products, but it doesn't
specify what those products are, so --
MS. RAWSON: I didn't really know there was this process that
you could do. I think Ms. MacAlister said she asked for precedence
and apparently didn't get any. But I didn't realize that there was a
process by which the county could help give you that interpretation.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We can't make a finding because
we can't interpret the --
MS. RAWSON: Right. Unless Mr. Wright's here and wants to
weigh in.
MS. MACALISTER: Nonetheless, we are here on a code
enforcement violation. So Mr. Fogg is a little bit between the
proverbial rock and a hard spot here.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We understand that, we're trying
to wrestle with it ourselves.
MS. ARNOLD: Staff requested what they got and presented for
you, and they're acting upon what they received from the zoning
department. If there was an objection to that, then the respondent has
the ability to request a formal interpretation.
I'm going to have to kind of look to Jeff to see whether or not the
board asks for a formal interpretation, how that whole thing works out.
MS. SCAVONE: I just wanted to add that also in that letter that
was received it says that if they wish to contest this decision they may
apply to Susan, the zoning director for an official interpretation of the
code.
MS. ARNOLD: Right. And that's the process they should have
taken if they object to that.
MS. MACALISTER: For $1,500. That part ofthe sentence was
left out.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'd like to get from Jeff some
assistance here.
MR. WRIGHT: Thank you, Madam Chairman. I'm not aware of
Page 94
16!A ~
November 29, 2(l'th
any provision that allows for this board to ask for a request for
interpretation. That's not to say one doesn't exist. I'm just not aware of
one. I've never seen it done in practice either.
I think that the process that Michelle has just explained is the
norm, and I know that that is expressed in the code.
Without knowing absolutely for certain, my opinion would be
that we would defer to the language that Michelle just quoted, which
says if they have a problem with this interpretation, they go to her to
follow up on that.
So I'm not aware and I'm not confident that there's any provision
that would allow direct request from this board to have Susan Istenes
issue her interpretation in response to your request.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm kind of caught between--
MS. MACALISTER: I would like to say--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- an issue myself -- excuse me.
MS. MACALISTER: I'm sorry ma'am.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: An issue myself because our
attorney is telling us that technically their attorney is asking us to
interpret the Land Development Code --
MS. ARNOLD: That's not what you do.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- and we can't do that. But
without something -- we have the zoning interpretation, which mayor
may not go along with how they're feeling. I'm not sure how we can
rule.
MR. WRIGHT: Well, I think that if they had a subsequent
redetermination from the zoning director, they could bring that back to
you and make their case and you would have jurisdiction to hear that.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So we would just have to go by
what we have in front of us from the --
MR. WRIGHT: Exactly.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, thank you.
MS. MACALISTER: If! might add, however, it seems to me that
Page 95
1 '0 ~" !~17
November 29,2007
initially code enforcement interpreted the Land Development Code
and cited my client, so we're now in front of the Code Enforcement
Board that says that it's apparently deciding they don't have the
authority to rule on the interpretation because we absolutely have a
code violation here that says he's --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We have a ruling from the zoning
department, who is the department that has the right to interpret the
Land Development Code, as far as I'm understanding.
What we're being asked to do by the county and what I am being
instructed to do by the county's attorney and our attorney is to utilize
that information to make our decision.
If you disagree with that, you have the right to go back and ask
the zoning department, pay the $1,500 fee, I understand, for the more
formal interpretation. And if at that time it comes back in your favor
and that we misinterpreted through what information we were given,
you can come back to us and we will rehear it. That's what I am being
instructed to do at this time. If that is the privy of the board. We
haven't gotten that far.
MS. MACALISTER: I understand.
So what you're telling me is really your authority only extends to
an up or down on the planning director's letter; is that correct?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes. Because I cannot -- we
cannot as a board interpret the Land Development Code.
MS. RAWSON: There's another alternative. If you find a
violation exists because you believe the interpretation of the zoning
board, knowing that you don't really have the power to interpret the
statute, she can appeal and the court may interpret the ordinance.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. And that wouldn't be the
$1,500 fee if you'd let the court do it.
MS. RAWSON: No, it might be more.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Do we have any questions?
MR. LEFEBVRE: Can I look at the LDC, please.
Page 96
..
16 Ii A 3
Novemoer 29,2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Sure. I'll pass both the letter and
that back.
MR. DANTINI: May I ask Mr. Fogg a question, please?
MR. FOGG: Sure.
MR. DANTINI: Is Steve LaRusso -- is he an employee of yours?
MR. FOGG: He is my subcontractor selling sheds for me. He's
my vendor. He represents Ted's Sheds as my vendor, yes.
MR. DANTINI: Thank you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do you have any questions?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: If not, then I'm going to close the
public hearing and open it up to the board for discussion.
MR. KELL Y: I'll make a motion that a violation does not exist.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear a second?
MR. DEAN: I'll second that motion.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Discussion?
MR. PONTE: I'd like a little discussion on that, yes, because the
photographic evidence that I saw and that was presented shows sheds,
a couple of items that look like playhouses, or dollhouses. I didn't see
any agricultural equipment or mulch or -- I didn't see anything there
related to nurseries.
I think there is a violation, just based on common sense of what I
was looking at in the photo evidence.
MR. KELLY: To answer why I don't think a violation exists, I
believe that the attorney's suggestion that it was originally
interpretated (sic) in a loose fashion from the planning department
here, I tend to agree with.
And I think that sheds are directly related to mulch, plants,
nursery items that are allowed to be sold in this property the way it's
zoned.
MR. PONTE: I think that's true, except these are cosmetic sheds.
The ones that we saw in the photo evidence have windows and things
Page 97
1'6 I Ii
Novembe?29,2107
like that. You don't put windows in a shed where you're going to store
mulch.
MR. KELLY: Well, actually, yeah, that's actually a feature of
them. And if there was a better picture of the property zoomed back
further, you would see not just bags of mulch, but entire piles larger
than the size of buildings that are sold in bulk.
So I think this is a bulk, if you will, kind of a wholesale nursery
facility, who into this pretense should be allowed to sell sheds as well.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, I have a motion on the
floor and a second. Any other discussion?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
All those opposed?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: We have a split decision.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: A split decision.
MS. ARNOLD: Mr. L'Esperance, did you --
MR. L'ESPERANCE: I recused myself.
MS. ARNOLD: Oh, that's right, I forgot about that.
MS. RAWSON: A split decision is a denial.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is a denial, correct. So that means
that the plaintiff has won.
MS. RAWSON: Correct.
MR. KELLY: Correct, the violation doesn't exist.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The violation does not exist.
MS. MACALISTER: Thank you.
MS. ARNOLD: Is that correct? Because a split decision is a
Page 98
ClJ;,p'A
J'~; f . ~ "",),
,.:J { . "':
dt"..'
November 29, 2007 '
denial of the motion at hand. They have the ability to --
MS. RAWSON: I think it's in our rules, isn't it?
MS. ARNOLD: -- they have the ability to do additional motions
if they want to.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Let me see. We happen to have
our rules with us today.
MS. RAWSON: No, that's right. Michelle's right, you can make
another motion.
MS. ARNOLD: Because it's -- no --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It's just a dead motion.
MS. ARNOLD: The motion was that there was no violation,
which fails. So you don't go away with no violation if there was no
approval of the motion.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: This is just no approval of the
motion.
So entertain another motion.
MR. KELL Y : We probably need more discussion to change one
person's mind, at least.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Can I look at the LDC once again?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm just thinking --
MS. ARNOLD: Can I ask the question, because Mr. Kelly did
explain why he came to the conclusion, which seemed like an
interpretation of what the zoning should say, or what the regulations
should say.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The public hearing was closed,
though, Michelle.
MR. KELL Y: I will comment, though, for the general benefit,
that although I can't interpret the code, I can interpret the letter that
was being used, I guess, was my rationale behind it.
MR. PONTE: But the letter says the sale of prefabricated sheds is
not considered a valid accessory use to the principal use of a retail
plant nursery and therefore prohibited on the property.
Page 99
Nov~~e~19, ~7
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Accessory of sale of plants,
stating that such sales limited primarily to the sale of plants,
decorative products, tools, accessories to --
MS. ARNOLD: Can you speak into the mic?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Sorry. It says here the Land
Development Code allows certain retail sales as accessory to the sale
of plants, stating that such sales shall be limited to the sale of plants,
decorative products and tools accessory to or required for the planting
and maintenance of said plants.
As you note in your letter, prefabricated sheds are not mentioned.
If you pull out the LDC code -- if you'll give it to me, please -- it
actually states that retail plant nursery subject to the following
conditions. Retail sales shall be limited primarily to the sale of plants,
decorative products such as mulch, stone, fertilizers, pesticides and
other products, and tools accessory to or required for the planting or
maintenance of said plants.
MR. PONTE: May I just direct your attention to that paragraph
that I underlined.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I know, I'm going on. It states -- it
goes on to state that prefabricated sheds are not mentioned. Retail
sales of prefabricated buildings including sheds are identified under
SIC Code 5211, lumber and other building material dealers.
Such prefabricated buildings are not directly related to growing
and maintaining plants. And although they may be used for storage of
tools and equipment related to growing or maintaining plants, they are
intended for much more general use.
The sales would therefore not be considered accessory to a retail
plant nursery.
MR. KELL Y: Shall I explain a little more why?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Sure.
MR. KELLY: If you look at the letter from the zoning
department -- I'm sorry, the department of zoning and land, there's a
Page 100
1 '6'1"" " ,,~'. __
~ ~
November 29;2007
statement that sheds are not considered accessory use, but yet under
that it goes on to cite the zoning ordinance which does include those
items necessary for planting and maintenance of said plants. So I
believe in the letter itself there's a contradiction.
I believe that a shed is necessary to house tools and equipment
and fertilizers in order to maintain those plants. And then I go to the
zoning code itself and it says planting and maintenance of said plants.
That gave me the two bullets that I used to come up with the idea that
they would be allowed.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Can I see the LDC again, please.
It says in Paragraph A in 2.03.01 that uses that are generally
considered compatible to agricultural uses that would not endanger or
damage agriculture, environment, potable water or wildlife resources
to the county are permissible under conditional uses.
Are we saying conditional uses -- conditional use on the next
page under section two, it says accessory uses, uses and structures that
are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right in a district.
Are we saying that these -- are we saying that this needs a
conditional use?
MR. KELLY: I would say that it's not contradictory to the way
that they're zoned and what their land use is allowing.
MR. LEFEBVRE: But I'm wondering if this needs a conditional
use.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I think we're trying to interpret the
Land Development Code.
MR. KELL Y: Yeah. And the letter also cites an occupational
license. And is it possible that maybe the occupational license doesn't
include sheds, yet they're trying to tie that into mounting a case
against them.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Well, it states that one of the conditional uses
would be the sale of potentially what -- a shed. So with that being
said, am I correct that there's a process to get a conditional use or is
Page 101
'~"6' ; A 3
";1.' t
November 29,2007
that just granted under the LDC?
MS. ARNOLD: Do you want us to answer that or --
MR. WRIGHT: Typically there would be a process for that. If!
may just point out a couple of things.
The zoning verification letter was in direct response to a request
from the investigator that was made in April, a couple of months
before. And in that letter from the zoning director, her responses are
specific to this situation.
And if you look at the NOV, it's the selling of sheds on ago zoned
property. There's nothing to suggest that they're using these for mulch
and storage. They're using them to sell them. And in that instance, the
zoning director speaks directly to that. The sale is not considered valid
and is prohibited.
So I just wanted to clarify that for the record.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you.
Okay, we need a motion.
MR. PONTE: I'll make a motion that a violation exists.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear--
MR. MORGAN: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So there is a violation that does
exist.
Recommendation from the county, please.
MS. SCAVONE: The county recommends that the Code
Enforcement Board order the respondent to pay all operational costs in
Page 102
16' "
November 29, 2007
the amount of $331.48 incurred in the prosecution of this case and
abate all violations by removing all sheds for sale within 14 days of
this hearing or a fine of $250 a day will be imposed until the violation
is abated.
The respondent must notify the code enforcement investigator
when the violation has been abated within 24 hours in order to
conduct a final inspection to confirm abatement.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Fourteen days to remove the
sheds?
MS. SCAVONE: Correct.
MS. MACALISTER: May I -- am I allowed to comment on that?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: No. Do you want her to? Go
ahead.
MS. MACALISTER: Thank you, ma'am.
We need longer than 14 days to consider the legal options of
either appeal directly to the circuit court or perhaps to seek the $1,500
letter to bring back to the board. That would be my only comment at
this point.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you.
MR. KELL Y: May I comment?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Sure.
MR. KELL Y: Given the fact that we originally had a split
decision on this, and it is on the borderline and it does need further
interpretation, I would like the board to be lenient in the time frame to
allow the respondent to possibly seek other alternatives.
MR. PONTE: I think that sets a dangerous precedent. Any case
that came before us, the person could -- the respondent could then say
well, I'd like to seek a little more advice here, so whatever the time
frame you've suggested isn't quite sufficient for me to get all of the
information that I need for further support to further develop my case.
That's a totally different situation.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm concerned about 14 days just
Page 103
16' f1 j
November 29,2007
to be able to find a place to move the sheds to legally --
MR. PONTE: It's not our problem.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- and remove them. I don't think
it's enough time, personally.
MR. PONTE: How many sheds are on the property? Didn't look
like that many.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: There were quite a few in the
pictures, I thought.
MR. LEFEBVRE: I have to agree with Mr. Ponte. And the
reason being is they did have an option already back in June when this
letter was written, and the option was to spend the $1,500 and get a
more formal result. And they didn't go forward, they waited until
today and it's the end of November.
And I think 14 days is a little bit short. I think maybe a little bit
more time possibly to move them. But to go through the hoops to go
with all the legal avenues, I think that would be extending it way too
far.
MR. KELLY: I believe it's absolutely reasonable to assume that
they didn't decide to go that route, pay the $1,500 and get the
interpretation was because they did have a very valid argument. And it
was enough of an argument to sway half of this board the first time
around.
I think that 14 days is obviously too soon in order to move those
sheds anyway, so I would agree with you there. But I would ask for
maybe a little more time to try some kind of review process.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: They can always come back to us
as well with extenuating circumstances. So -- are there any questions
to the participants?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Ifnot, I'll close the public hearing
again and move back to formulating a motion.
MR. KELL Y: Can I take a stab at it?
Page 104
16' A ~
"""
November 29, 2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Sure. Oc,
MR. KELLY: You guys can yell at me if you like.
That the respondent pay operational costs of $331.48 within 30
days of the date of this hearing.
Two, remove all sheds within 120 days or a fine of $250 a day
will be imposed for each day thereafter the violation is not abated.
And three, notify code enforcement within 24 hours of abatement.
MR. PONTE: 120 days. These are portable sheds designed to be
put up and taken down quickly. 120 days to take down a half dozen
sheds, I can't go along with that.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Yeah, I think 120 days is excessive.
MR. MORGAN: I agree with 90 days.
MR. KELLY: I'll amend my motion to 90 days for the removal of
all sheds.
MR. DEAN: I'll second that.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
MR. PONTE: Opposed.
MS. ARNOLD: Can we hear the full order again?
MR. KELLY: Pay op. costs of $331.48 within 30 days. To
remove all sheds within 90 days or a fine of $250 per day until the
violation is abated. And three, notify code enforcement within 24
hours of abatement.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And if in your legal process you
find that that's not enough time, then you have recourse to come back
to us and request.
MS. MACALISTER: Absolutely. Thank you very much.
Page 105
; ~ A 3
November 29,2007
And thank you, Mr. L'Esperance.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The next case, Board of County
Commissioners versus R.P.K. Enterprises of Bonita, Inc.
MS. MARKU: This case is in reference to Code Enforcement
Board Case No. 2007-121, Department Case No. 2007-070013.
F or the record, the respondent is present.
(All speakers were duly sworn.)
MS. MARKU: The respondent and the board was sent a packet
of evidence and I would like to enter the packet of evidence as Exhibit
A.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Entertain a motion.
MR. KELLY: Make a motion we accept.
MR. PONTE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MS. MARKU: Violation of Ordinances 04-41, Collier County
Land Development Code as amended, Sections 10.02.06(B)(2)(A),
1O.02.06(B)(2)(D)(ix), 5.04.05(A)(I), 5.04.05(A)(2), and 2004-58, the
Property Maintenance Code, Sections 16(2)(i) and 16(2)(j).
Description of violation: Signs without proper permits and
banner displayed without proper permits.
Location/address where violation exists: 4295 Bonita Beach
Road. Folio No. 24470640005.
Name and address of owner/person in charge of violation
location: R.P.K. Enterprises of Bonita, Incorporated. Attention:
Jeffrey Mantz as registered agent, 27567 Grove Road, Bonita Springs,
Page 106
- 16 f A ~
Novem13er ~9, 2001'"
Florida, 34135.
Date violation first observed: July 7th, 2007.
Date owner/person in charge given notice the violation: August
30th, 2007.
Date onlby which violation to be corrected: September 30th,
2007.
Date of reinspection: October 2nd, 2007.
Results of reinspection: Violation remains.
At this time I would like to turn the case over to Code
Enforcement Investigator Kitchell Snow.
MR. SNOW: Good morning. Before we begin, I would like to
submit an evidence packet with photographs. And it does have a letter
in the back I would like your consideration on.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'll entertain a motion to accept
Packet B for the County.
MR. DEAN: Motion to accept Packet B.
MR. PONTE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
MR. SNOW: For the record, the respondent has seen the
photographs. I have discussed what exactly the evidence details.
If you will look that it shows evidence that there were banners,
there was legal signage. This property used to be Bonita Beach Bar
and Grill. I guess the -- well, I'm sure the business has since left and a
Page 107
(6 fA 3
November 29,2007
new owner moved in there, or a new business owner moved in there.
He erected signs, illegal signs. He had banners. He didn't have any
permits for anything.
I attempted contact several times with him. I left door knockers, I
left business cards. He never called me and I really didn't understand
why. I attempted several times in the evening to go by and see them, I
attempted in the morning, and I exhausted all avenues to try to get in
touch with him. I issued a Notice of Violation.
Once that was issued and the time expired, I had contact, various
contacts with the respondent, Mr. Mantz, and he expressed to me he
had the same problem with his tenant, that he wasn't paying his rent,
he was not in compliance, wouldn't talk to him. And we were having
this discussion, and he was currently trying to get him evicted and
move on.
But unfortunately the violations continued to remain, and that's
why we're here today. The violations, most of them have since been
abated. As the Notice of Violation states, we need temporary use
permits for the banners that were displayed, and we'll discuss that and
my recommendations.
But the letter on the back talks about Mr. Mantz and some of the
issues that he has in this issue. And the county's a little sympathetic
with what happened, but still, the violations were there and the
violations were there for quite some time.
MR. LEFEBVRE: The first page states that there's a
recommendation. Should that be pulled from --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Urn-hum.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Let the record note that the recommendation,
which is the first page of the packet, has been pulled.
MR. SNOW: And the photographs are current yesterday. There's
still a wall sign that has been painted over. We have discussed that. It
needs to be painted in a workmanlike fashion, the same color of the
structure.
Page 108
16/J1 3
November 29, 2007~'
He's indicated to me he's doing a lot of work on his own on the
weekends and will take care of it as soon as he can. And again, we'll
discuss that at a later time.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Snow, is that all you have?
MR. SNOW: Ma'am, yes, ma'am, I'm clear.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Sir, would you like to speak?
MR. MANTZ: Yes. My name is Jeff Mantz. My wife and I are
the owner of that property under the corporation R.P .K. Enterprises.
Last April the former owner of the business, Bonita Beach Grill sold
the business, which we had no part of, to Midnight Enterprises, which
was the corporate entity that took possession of the business. I
executed a lease from them in April, and from the very start had
difficulty with the tenant as far as collecting rent.
I came by one Monday and found he had painted the building
iridescent yellow and then had put -- later on put banners up over the
old signs.
Code violations came out, I tried to contact him a number of
times. And having the lease, I had no right to go on the property and
make the corrections myself.
Everything -- we went from bad to worse. I finally had to hire an
attorney to start eviction proceedings. And I think October 7th, I
believe, or November 7th, he finally vacated the premises and then
within 12 hours I went and removed the signs.
His solution to the iridescent yellow building color was to paint it
a better color, but to paint the name of the business on the side of the
building. So at the same time I removed the banner, I used Kilz to
spray over the old painted-on sign, with the intent I will paint the
entire side of the building so it matches one color.
As I said, I had no right to go on to the property until he vacated
the premises, and so my hands were tied. But as soon as I could access
the property, I took care of the problem.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions?
Page 109
u\ A N~ember29,2007
MR. MORGAN: Mr. Snow, what's the present condition ofthe
building?
MR. SNOW: The building is vacated. The only--
MR. MORGAN: I mean, the exterior is--
MR. SNOW: The exterior still has, if you'll look on one of the
photographs, it's -- looks like it's been whited out on the side where
they had Shooters on. Currently that's the only thing here.
There is some signage on the property, and we'll go over when I
have recommendations about some of the things that we can do on this
property, that he's going to have to do, because there is no tenant in
there. And the code is very specific about signs and when they're
allowed and what you're allowed to do with them. So we can discuss
that.
But to answer your question, the only thing that's left of the
former business is that whiteout of Shooters.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions?
MR. LEFEBVRE: Yeah, I guess a follow-up to that. So the way
__ the status of it being painted in white trying to cover it, is that still a
violation?
MR. SNOW: Yes, sir. The code states in the property
maintenance Code 2004-58, states if a wall sign is removed, it has to
be painted in workmanlike fashion to cover any shadowing created by
that removal. So once he paints that, then that violation will be abated.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Which he has already stated that he's in the
process, this was is a process to kill, or to take care of -- I don't know
what color the lettering was --
MR. MANTZ: It was very dark. It was a brown on a very light
beige building. So I felt the need to put a base coat over first. I used
the Kilz.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Right, it's almost like primer over a dark color
of paint in your house.
MR. MANTZ: Yes. But I'm probably going to need to paint the
Page 11 0
!o~e~ber19, 2~7
entire wall because unless I can match exactly the old color --
MR. LEFEBVRE: Very unlikely you will.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: If not, I'll move to finding of fact.
MR. LEFEBVRE: I'd like to make a motion that there is a
violation.
MR. PONTE: I'll second the motion.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(N 0 response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Would you like to give your
recommendation, please.
MR. SNOW: Yes, ma'am, I would. Madam Chair, I would like to
read a definition for you from the sign code.
When signs -- when a business is no longer there, and if it's got
copy on it or doesn't have copy on it, it could be deemed an
abandoned sign after 90 days.
I would like to read this definition too because this is pertinent to
my recommendations.
It states: Sign Abandon. Any sign or sign structure expressly
installed for the purpose of affixing a sign which bears no sign or copy
for 90 consecutive days or more or for a period of 90 consecutive days
or more, displays information which incorrectly identifies the
business, owner, lessor or principal activity conducted on the site, or
Page 111
pf!flr kl
16' ~ :;
November 29,2007
which through lack of maintenance becomes illegible or nearly so or
in a state of disrepair, signs displaying an Available for Lease or
similar message or partially obliterated faces which do not identify a
particular product, service or facility shall be deemed abandoned.
And the important thing here is there is no copy. If you look on
the photographs, there's no copy on them anymore. So I've discussed
this with him and he's pretty sure he's going to have a tenant there
within 90 days. But if not, then those signs have to come down.
My recommendations are as follows: Obtain required permits for
signs if attainable or remove within 90 days of the date of the hearing
or a fine of$150 a day will be imposed until said signs are permitted
or removed.
If a wall sign is removed, paint facade in a workmanlike fashion
to cover any shadowing created by the removal of said sign. The
permit number is to be affixed to the said sign upon CO.
This is about the temporary use permits and the banners. And we
understand that the tenant was there, but he's also responsible as a
property owner.
Number two, obtain temporary use permit for the banner
displayed on the property from 7/2/07 to 7/15/07 and from 7/17/07 to
7/30/07 within 14 days of the date of the hearing or a fine of$150 a
day will be imposed until such time as the permit is obtained.
After-the-fact permit fees of two times the amount of the normal
permit are to apply.
The respondent is to notify the code enforcement investigator
when the violation has been abated in order to conduct a final
inspection to confirm abatement.
The respondent is to pay all operational costs in the amount of
273.28 incurred in the prosecution ofthis case within 30 days of the
date of the hearing.
MR. MANTZ: Can I speak? You know, the tenant is the one that
applied for the sign. I had nothing to do with that at all and really had
Page 112
16 I A N~~mber 29,2007
no way to control what he did. I guess I just really -- to go -- for me to
have to go pull a permit for a sign that I never wanted to do to begin
with, I wonder how fair that is. That's my only comment.
MS. ARNOLD: Can I just speak to that for a second? It's -- the
temporary use permit for banners are applicable to the business, so -- a
part of why we generally ask for this type of a corrective action is that
if the same business is there, they're not granted additional days
beyond what the code already permits.
In this case you've heard that that business that obtained the
temporary use permit is no longer there. So to penalize the property
owner for permits, after-the-fact permits, I think the county's going to
withdraw that.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So the after-the-fact permits will
be withdrawn.
Entertain a motion? Or ask questions?
MR. LEFEBVRE: A question regarding the sign removal within
or after 90 days. Does that mean the pole and every -- it's the whole
structure?
MR. SNOW: Down to the ground. And the wall sign too. There's
a wall sign up there, sir. So all signage that was permitted before, and
I did research on the property, Bonita Beach Bar and Grill did have
permits for those signs.
Any time you make a change to any sign it requires a new
permit. And even if they put them up and had a new tenant move in,
they're going to have to repermit anything.
The county's concern is it doesn't -- we wanted to make sure that
it aesthetically keeps its same value and doesn't run in disrepair. And
unfortunately it states 90, it's deemed abandoned and has to be brought
to the ground.
MR. MANTZ: My question would be, I have some very good
tenants I'm going to be leasing it to, I'm very sure of. But with the
state of economy, my concern is even if! can't find a tenant in 90
Page 113
I,'i':
16J
"%
- I'
November 29,2007
days, to pull a very valuable, non-replaceable sign down, that's a
rather harsh --
MR. LEFEBVRE: I guess that's what I'm asking, what would be
__ is there any alternative? Can he put up a For Sale sign or For Lease
sign?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: No, because that's what he read in
the code, you couldn't.
MR. MANTZ: I'll move my business in there before I'll pull a
sign down and get a sign permit for the business.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's an alternative.
MR. LEFEBVRE: I mean, because the cost, I would think, to
remove a sign and to install a sign, if it's going to be four months, five
months --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's why he took the time to
read us the code before. He's kind of got his hands tied with that.
MR. MANTZ: I don't believe that sign could ever be replaced
under current codes. That building's been there for a long, long time.
MR. SNOW: Well, it was permitted in 2005, so it's after the 2003
sign code, so it meets current code. I don't think that will be an issue.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Hopefully he can get a tenant in
within 90 days. If not, he'll do it himself.
MR. MANTZ: For sure.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions?
MR. KELLY: One question, Mr. Snow. Does that include the one
on the parapet wall or the mansard as well?
MR. SNOW: Yes, sir. All the signage has to come, so --
MR. MANTZ: That will be done, I think, by the end ofthis
weekend. That looks terrible.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions?
MR. LEFEBVRE: I make a motion to accept the county's
recommendation with the removal of the one section with the
after-the-fact permits.
Page 114
16' A NoJmber 29, 2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear a second?
MR. MORGAN: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
MR. MANTZ: Thank you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you.
And Board of County Commissioners versus Horse Creek
Partners.
(All speakers were duly sworn.)
MS. MARKU: This is in reference to Code Enforcement Board
Case No. 2007-122, Department Case No. 2005-090022.
F or the record, the respondent is present. The respondent and the
board was sent a packet of evidence and I would like to enter the
packet of evidence as Exhibit A.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Entertain a motion.
MR. KELL Y: I'll make a motion to accept it.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
Page 115
Ji}5T i~ ~
Novemoer 29, 2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MS. MARKU: Violation of Ordinance 04-41 as amended, the
Land Development Code, Sections 9.03.03(D)(I)(d), 9.03.03(D)(2)(a)
plus (b), 9.03.03(D)(3)(c), 9.03.03(D)(5), 10.02.06(B)(2)(a), and
1 0.02.06(B)(2)( d)(ix).
Description of violation: Nonconforming sign erected prior to
1991 and exists beyond the operation schedule regarding conformity
to current code and not properly maintained according to code.
Location/address where violation exists: 102 Palm River Boulevard.
Folio No. 65220000100.
Name and address of person/owner person in charge of violation
location: Horse Creek Partners, Ltd, Alan T. Schiffman as registered
agent, 870 Illth Avenue North, Naples, Florida, 34108.
Date violation first observed: August 25th, 2005.
Date owner/person in charge given Notice of Violation: October
1st, 2007.
Date on/by which violation to be corrected: October 19th, 2007.
Date of reinspect ion. October 21st, 2007.
Results of reinspection: Violation remains.
At this time, I would like to turn the case over to Code
Enforcement Investigator Kitchell Snow.
MR. SNOW: Please excuse me, Madam Chair. I haven't showed
the photographs of what I've got, so I will need to show those to the
respondent before we proceed.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay.
MR. SNOW: I would assume you're looking through my --
MS. ARNOLD: You have to ask --
MR. SNOW: Oh. Could you -- I would like to submit as
evidence. I'm sorry. I have photographs and some other evidence. I
would like to submit that, please.
MR. KELLY: Are we making a motion then to accept all of it at
once, then?
Page 116
~1'~6IA 3
November 29,2007
.-
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yeah.
MR. KELL Y: I make a motion to accept.
MR. PONTE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
MR. SNOW: I'll give you all time. This has been a very, very
long running case. It concerns a nonconforming sign. I believe we all
probably know, it's on Immokalee Road, the Fairways Motel. I think
we've all seen it. I've received numerous complaints from citizens
from the Palm River homeowners association concerning this sign.
If you look at the first page I have, that's -- basically we're talking
about the sign, where it's located. That X is where the sign is. And
we've heard this case before, so.
The photographs are taken yesterday of the sign. As you notice,
the sign has a shroud cover on it, which is illegal. It's got no panels in
it, I guess they were blown out in the last hurricane. It does look a
little better than it has in the past, but it still is not what it should be.
If you look at the photographs, the concern about this sign is A,
it's too large, it has never been permitted that we know of, and it is a
nonconforming sign. And according to code, a nonconforming sign
has to be brought up to code by February 1st of2003. I have that listed
in your packet.
I've also included in your packet a letter. There's been several
meetings on this to try to find a solution for the property owners. We
Page 117
1'6 I ~ov~er 29,2007
are very concerned about the businesses and how they're maintained
and helping them find solutions to their problems.
Unfortunately in this case there's been several attempts and
variances and everything, meetings, that have gone on since 2005.
I want to draw your attention to a letter from Susan Istenes that is
one ofthe sole people within code enforcement, as we talked earlier,
or as you heard earlier, that is allowed to interpret code. She's the
VOIce.
And there was a meeting, as you can see. The meeting attendees
were zoning and land development review, Susan Istenes, Code
Enforcement Director Michelle Arnold, Marlene Serrano, my
supervisor, County Attorneys Jeff Wright, JeffKlatzkow, and the
principal planner Nancy Gundlach.
And I will read this for you: The primary purpose -- and this is a
synopsis of the meeting that was held. The primary purpose of this
meeting was to discuss the possibility of how the sign might be made
to be a legal sign that is in conformance with the Collier County Land
Development Code, LDC.
The existing sign must be removed. Must be removed. Because it
is not compliant with the Land Development Code.
Susan Istenes suggested the parking facilities easement site the
existing sign mostly resides on be rezoned to the same R T, or
Residential Tourist, as the land that the motel is located.
Once the rezoning is accomplished, the petitioner could seek a
variance for the dimensional sign requirements such as height and
area. If, if, the variance is granted by the Collier County Board of
Commissioners, then the petitioner could build a new sign and locate
it on the same site as the parking facilities easement.
I've also included another synopsis. And this is from Nancy
Gundlach, an e-mail from her. I will let you all read this one, it's rather
lengthy. It talks about some other things that are involved, how long
the case has drawn out, what has happened in the case.
Page 118
",,,.. u ..
cr, II II'!.".,
, .' L .,~.'. \
. h ~./
November 29, 2007
This is a nonconforming sign. It has been allowed to exist far too
long.
In a large process, which we're talking about variance
applications, I don't know if you're familiar with how this goes, but
basically what happens is you attend a pre-ap meeting. All the people
that are involved with this within the county such as landscape, sign,
principal planners, everyone attends that meeting. The respondent
attends that meeting. They submit for this. It has to go to all the
different departments.
Once that goes to the different departments, they usually receive
a rejection letter in 30 days, that's what we hope. Code stipulates it's
got to be quicker than that, but 30 days.
Once that goes through, the respondent has six months to submit
the correction for that. So technically, this could keep running on and
running on and running -- and that's what has happened in the past.
This is a nonconforming sign, nonconforming structure that's been
allowed to exist for far too long.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is that all you have, Mr.--
MR. SNOW: Yes, ma'am.
MR. HANCOCK: It's not good morning. Good afternoon,
Madam Chair, members of the code enforcement board.
My name is Tim Hancock with Davidson Engineering. I'm here
on behalf of Steven Mirowitz, the owner of Fairways Resort. Also
with us is Ms. Judy Battista, the manager of the property.
And as previously submitted in accordance with a code
enforcement action that you actually withdrew this morning as your
first action of business, we do have authorization from Horse Creek
Partners to represent them in this matter.
The subject property is owned by Horse Creek Partners and
Fairways Resort as a perpetual right to use the parcel for parking to
support the resort, and also has authority granted by the property
owner to erect and maintain a sign on the property.
Page 119
16'j A 3
November 29,2007
The sign in questions is 41 years old. I'm happy to say, it predates
me. Not by much, but it predates me. It's been in continuous use
during that time. This property has never fallen out of use, never been
vacant. It's operated continuously for 41 years.
The current condition of the sign being covered with a temporary
banner is a leftover gift from Hurricane Wilma in September of2005.
Wilma blew out the face of the sign into two pieces, making it
impossible to just simply put it back. This is where the tale of woe
begins for Mr. Mirowitz, who has owned the property for nearly 10
years.
Had the replacement of those panels occurred, we might not even
be here today, despite the fact that the sign does not comply with the
current code. We recognize that.
This item was heard in May of this year by this board, who
approved a stipulated settlement agreement that the petitioner was to
pursue with all diligence a variance for the sign, and upon granting of
that variance, should it be granted, a new sign that met current
regulations would be constructed. We appreciated that consideration.
That was May of 2007.
We had the pre-application for that variance in May of 2006, a
year prior. We filed for that variance in September of2006. Contrary
to what Mr. Snow placed into the record, which is patently false, it did
not take us six months to respond to what the county put forth as
comments, it took the county six months to give us comments on our
variance application.
The comment letter is dated in April of 2007. So no, it wasn't six
months for us to respond. We received it in April, 2007.
We had a hearing before you in May of2007, and in an effort to
resubmit -- and let me tell you why it took six months. The original
planner was Carolina Valera. She was moved to growth management.
Somehow it fell between the cracks. This is not a reflection on Nancy
Gundlach at all. But Nancy picked it up and we began getting activity
16 '" 'A i ,t4/~
Novem~r 29,2007
on it.
What came out of that after our meeting in May is in June we had
several e-mails and several meetings with county staff, and Mr. Snow
attended at least one of them that I attended and maybe two of them,
where we found out or were informed by planning staff that a variance
was not possible. The variance could be granted for, examples,
reductions in measurements or setbacks.
But in this case, the small strip in front of Fairways Resort that
the sign is situated on is zoned RSF-3, which is a single-family zoning
district.
It's a leftover piece. We don't know how this happened. As a
matter of fact, right across the driveway, if you look at the pictures,
you'll see a LaPlaya sign. It also is an off-premise sign located in
RSF-3 zoning--
MR. SNOW: Just for the record, that has no bearing on this case.
That has nothing to do with the sign we're talking about. I object to
that testimony.
MR. HANCOCK: Thank you. It is recognized by us and the
county it was permitted in error. So it's not a precedent, we understand
that.
But this piece is RSF-3.
So after agreeing to pursue a variance, after incurring the cost of
applying for a variance and doing everything you need to do to go
through the variance process, we're told sorry, variance is not an
option.
So in July of this year, we're told you have to rezone the
property. That's a pretty significant step. The property is 1.2 acres,
plus or minus. The cost is going to be $10,000 plus to rezone it, at
which point we haven't even begun to get a sign permitted and built.
But Mr. Mirowitz has decided, because of the value ofthe sign to
the business long-term, quite frankly because the property sits well off
the road, the sign is responsible for a significant amount of business.
Page 121
~
16' ~NoJinber 29,2007
Without it the disadvantages would be too great.
We had a pre-application meeting yesterday with staff on a
rezone for the property. This is starting to feel like the movie
Groundhog Day. In May of last year we had a pre-application for a
variance, which was supposed to help solve this problem, and we got
three-quarters of the way down the road and got turned back.
Here we are again with pre-application conference number two,
all ofthis costing Mr. Mirowitz money and time.
Our goal simply is to do whatever is necessary to allow us to
replace the existing sign with a sign of lesser size that is more
reflective of the current sign code. We mayor may not seek variances
on the permitted height in conjunction with that rezone, but we have
every intent to continue with this rezone in order to effectively replace
the sign with something that is approved by the board.
We have initiated that process. Now that we've literally wasted
the last 12 to 13 months on the issue of a variance, we're going back to
start and going with a rezone.
What we're asking you to consider today in your action is that --
the staff recommendation, I believe, is for just complete removal of
the sign within 120 days. Ifwe had the property rezoned and went to
apply for a building permit for a sign, we'd be lucky to get it in 120
days.
So in effect what staff is saying is four months from now take the
sign down, and if it takes you another eight, nine months to get a new
sign, tough nuts.
This property relies on that sign to a degree. And if I could ask to
enter into the record as Exhibit B -- and I brought copies for
everybody so you don't have to share.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Entertain a motion.
MR. DEAN: Motion to accept Exhibit B from respondent.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
Page 122
16 I ~oveler 29,2007
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
MR. HANCOCK: Unlike many ofthe cases you've heard today
where somebody executed an action that resulted in a code
enforcement violation, all Mr. Mirowitz and Ms. Battista are doing is
running an existing resort that's been there for 41 years.
What I'm providing you is, we have the fortune of being able to
tell you exactly how valuable that sign is and why we would like relief
from the 120 days.
When a person checks into the motel, they're given a card. We
want to know how did you find out about us. Well, it turns out that
somewhere between eight percent and 15 percent of all people coming
into the resort notice the sign. They saw the sign and they turned in.
And 10 and behold, we had guests. That has been annual revenue
impact of somewhere between 50 and $72,000 a year if that sign just
disappears.
So ifMr. Mirowitz seems somewhat obstinate in his position of
not wanting to just simply remove the sign and roll the dice in the
meantime, I think that is a clear exhibit of why he's taken that position.
And again, our position is not to keep the existing sign. We want
to replace it. But it's taken almost a year for us to find the vehicle in
order to do that.
And again, I don't mean to cast aspersions with Mr. Snow, he has
worked with us where he can work with us. But I think, as Mr. Snow
will tell you, we sat in a meeting with a lot of people scratching their
Page 123
161ft
J \
'7
Nevember 29,2007
heads on this very issue, on, gee, what is the solution, what is the
vehicle, how can this happen.
The exhibits attached to that cover letter basically show you the
difference between where that existing sign is located, which is a
green arrow on Page 2, and where, if we were required to erect the
sign on the RT-zoned parcel, is the red arrow.
The difference here is a difference of visibility when you're
coming down Immokalee Road from the Interstate, which is the vast
majority of folks who use the property, of over 1,000 feet when you
can see a sign versus less than 100 feet when it would become visible.
And that's why we feel that the simple removal ofthe sign,
irrespective of the processes that we've been told to go through and
then road blocked and then asked to go through again, is not
appropriate.
What we would request is we have no problem with there being a
time frame placed on the rezone that is reasonable. I've been doing this
for 20 years. Currently a rezone takes a minimum of nine months,
realistically, 12 months to get through the process. Subsequent to the
rezone, and if there are variances required, we would then companion
with the rezone, a sign will have to be permitted. Obviously we can't
permit the sign before the zoning is done.
We can design it, we can be ready to go, we can be ready to put a
sign permit in, and that can take 30 to 60 days for a sign permit.
I know it is difficult to stand here and ask you to allow something
to sit out there that causes Mr. Snow to receive phone calls from folks
for another year.
What we hope to demonstrate to you is that the fiscal impact of
the removal of that sign, the fact that it's been in place for 41 years and
was not in essence an active code violation enacted by the property
owner. And furthermore, that they have spent considerable time and
money over the last 13, 15 months in trying to follow a course of
action provided us by the county planning staff and were then turned
Page 124
16' A 3
November 29,2007
back should not count against us in looking at a window of
opportunity to make this correct.
The last item I want to request is we paid administrative costs the
last time we were before you. That particular violation was actually
withdrawn this morning. And ifthere's any consideration of the
application of paid administrative costs on a Notice of Violation that
was withdrawn, we'd appreciate that. In the overall scheme ofthings
that's a small issue, but it's something I wanted to ask, because once
you close the public hearing we are at your mercy.
With that, I'm going to ask Mr. Mirowitz ifthere's anything else
he would like to add to the testimony provided, with your permission.
And beyond that, that's the extent of what we have to present here
today.
MR. MIROWITZ: I suppose the only other thing I'd like to add
to the testimony is the figures on the revenue dollars. If somebody
returns the following year, we count them as a repeat guest, so it's
quite possible that somebody came to the motel from the sign the first
year and then followed up the subsequent years as a repeat guest,
which would not be reflected in these figures.
And that's about it, unless anybody has any questions.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I don't have any questions. I do
have one comment. And I don't know if it's going to take me offthis
case or not. But I used to live in Cocohatchee River Estates behind
Palm River back in '74, and the sign was there at the time. I just know
it was there.
MS. ARNOLD: I don't think I was sworn, can I --
(Speaker duly sworn.)
MS. ARNOLD: I just wanted to add I don't believe this case --
well, I know the case isn't about the existence of this particular sign
for 41 years, which happens to be younger than me.
MR. HANCOCK: But I look much older.
MS. BARNETT: I just told a story. I'm older than the sign.
Page 125
16ft\ 'X
, N~ember29,2007
MS. ARNOLD: It's merely regarding the fact that it did exist
prior to 1991, and the sign code -- or the sign code portion of the Land
Development Code requires all signs that existed prior to that date that
did not conform to the LDC need to be brought into conformance. So I
just wanted to clarify what the case before you is about.
MR. HANCOCK: And while we don't dispute any of those
points, the truth is as a business owner who's busy operating his
business, when the code was changed in '91, a light didn't go off in
Mr. Mirowitz's head that said, hey, I've got to replace my sign.
Sometimes it takes a code enforcement violation to bring this to their
attention.
MS. ARNOLD: Right. I just merely say that for clarification,
because I think it was kind of being swung off track a little bit.
And, you know, staffwill give you our recommendation, but
obviously it's up to the board to grant whatever time frame you find.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have a question for Michelle in
regards to the fact that we did withdraw the previous case and they did
pay those charges.
MS. ARNOLD: Right. What happened was we withdrew the
Code Enforcement Board case and -- the code department case is the
same case. We're not going to charge an additional operational cost. In
fact, because they've already paid there's no recommendation to
charge operational costs for this case.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So rather than refund, we're just
not charging any additional.
MS. ARNOLD: Right. Well, it's the same -- unfortunately
because we have a separate number for the Code Enforcement Board
cases, the code case is still the same and -- yeah, that's not an issue.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I just needed clarification on that.
Any other questions?
MR. SNOW: If! may add. Sir, when was your original variance
submitted, Mr. Hancock?
Page 126
16 r A Nolmber 29,2007
MR. HANCOCK: Variance was submitted in September of2006.
MR. SNOW: I'm not going to introduce this as evidence because
we did this in the last hearing, but we have a letter from -- to Davidson
Engineering, to Mr. Hancock, a letter that talks about their variance,
and it's a reply letter to them, so it didn't take the county six months.
This is dated January 24th. So he and I differ on the dates about who
was responsible.
I don't think that's the issue. I think the issue here is there's a
nonconforming sign on the property, it's been there a long time, we
need to find a solution.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, if not, I'll close the public
hearing and move to finding of fact. Discussion?
MR. KELLY: Well, I think the respondent admitted that there
was a violation, so I make a motion that a violation does exist.
MR. DEAN: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Recommendation from the
county?
MR. SNOW: Yes, ma'am. Madam Chair, the CEB orders the
respondent to, number one, remove the nonconforming off-premise
sign and structure within 120 days of the date of the hearing or a fine
Page 127
16'
A 3
November 29, 2007
of$150 a day will be imposed until such time as the sign is removed.
The respondent must notify the code enforcement investigator within
24 hours that the violation has been abated in order to conduct a final
inspection to confirm abatement.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Discussion amongst the board?
MR. KELL Y: I believe that -- I don't think the county would
have a problem extending the time frame. I just was a little concerned
that I didn't want to speak too far out without, you know, hearing some
other comments.
But maybe a year. The respondent said nine months would be on
the good end, so maybe a year to get this thing taken care of.
I'd like to hear other people's opinion.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Again, what do you feel would be a time
frame for rezone and a variance?
MR. HANCOCK: Because this rezone hopefully is on the simple
side, since there's no structures involved, I think we're looking at a
minimum of nine months from start to completion of the rezone.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Of the rezone. And then from there you'd have
to get a variance; is that correct?
MR. HANCOCK: Well, the variance, we would agree to run any
variances as companion items of the rezone, and rather then tacking
them on the end. You can do that and they hear both items on the
same day.
So if there are any variances requested, we'd run them companion
with the rezone, because without the rezone we can't request a
vanance.
And then the only thing left would be to pull a permit on the sign.
It would be up to us to take the risk of getting the sign design and
everything done while the rezone is going on so that the permit could
go in shortly thereafter. And sign permits should be issued within 30
days, but sometimes you get an electrical comment and it kicks you to
maybe days for a permit.
Page 128
is rA 3
November 29, 2007
MR. LEFEBVRE: And submittal of the sign permit could not be
done until the rezone and until the variance has been accepted,
correct?
MR. HANCOCK: Based upon my experience with your review
staff, that is correct.
MR. LEFEBVRE: I think a year would be appropriate. So that
way they don't have to come in front of us again.
MR. PONTE: I agree with that. I think that's right.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I agree also. I have a tendency to
agree with that as well, due to the fact that they've already gone
through one mitigating situation. I think we need to give them some
leniency and try to help them along. And the fact that the sign has
existed as long as it has and hasn't really caused any issues, I don't
think it's going to hurt anybody to stay there that length of time.
I know it's not in conformance, but -- and you want to get it
fixed. But I -- this is kind of the way we're leaning --
MR. WRIGHT: I just want to add something. You're probably
going to address this without my comment, but neither the variance
nor the rezone are guaranteed. So I would just ask that your order
reflect the possibility that it would be denied.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: If it's denied then they have 30
days to get a new sign permitted. I would think that would --
MR. KELLY: Whatever. I mean, if you don't get it within 12
months, then you'll have to tear it down and that's the end of it.
MR. LEFEBVRE: I guess that wasn't put in there, correct?
MR. KELLY: Well, it's 12 months to either remove -- it's 12
months to remove the sign or to get -- either way, they're going to
have to remove the sign and put a new one. So, I mean, 12 months to
remove the sign, period.
MR. HANCOCK: For the record, the applicant understands that
the time period is the time period. Period. No exceptions.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Want to take a stab at it?
Page 129
16 I NJember 29,2007
MR. KELLY: Sure. Make a motion that in this case the
respondent has 12 months to remove the sign and abate the violation.
And number two, notify code enforcement within 24 hours of
abatement.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Ifhe doesn't do it in 12 months,
what's the fine?
MR. KELLY: Fine of$150 a day for each day the sign -- or the
violation is not abated.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Operating costs were already
paid.
MR. DEAN: I'll second that motion.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay.
MR. HANCOCK: I thank you.
MR. SNOW: Thank you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It's that time.
MS. ARNOLD: Before we break?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes.
MS. ARNOLD: There has been one other request. We have on
the agenda Item 5- B- 7, which is an imposition of fines. And the
respondent --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Francois?
MS. ARNOLD: Yeah. And they're here and they're requesting to
Page 130
16'1 ~'1~
Novemt?er 29,2007
be heard before lunch break.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Because they have been so
considerate to sit through all this, we'll be glad to hear them.
MR. WHITE: Just for the record, Madam Chair, we have no
objection.
(Speakers were duly sworn.)
MS. ARNOLD: It's my turn. I'm sitting here.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It's been a long morning.
MS. ARNOLD: It's been a long morning. This is Board of
County Commissioners versus Joseph Ferio Francois. And this case
was heard by the Board of County Commissioners -- I mean, sorry,
Code Enforcement Board on October 26th, 2006.
The finding of fact that was entered into the record is attached for
your review. On that date the respondent was found in violation and
ordered to comply in accordance with the order.
Compliance has not been met. This particular case was a
structure that had extensive fire damage, and the respondent is
attempting or had been attempting to get a building permit to correct
the damage and to put the building in operational. That has not
occurred.
As a result, fines have accrued at a rate of $250 per day for the
period between October 27th, 2007 through November 29th, today,
for 33 days, for a total of $8,250.
Additionally, operational costs of $319.79 cents have not yet
been paid. So we're asking at this time for fines to be imposed in the
amount of$8,569.79.
Before the respondent is able to have their opportunity to speak,
the board's order directed them to obtain building permits and COs
within a year, and if they didn't comply, that the fines would accrue.
We have since this time been authorizing the county to consider
removal of structures. And I think that this has been going on for some
time, and the county is going to request an amendment to your order,
Page 131
]"" ,~- A
I, i~-' ~
November1'9,2007
which --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We've already been through that
so we know we can do it.
MS. ARNOLD: Yes, absolutely. To consider an alternate to the
abatement.
But before we discuss that any further, I think the respondent
should have an opportunity to speak to why they haven't obtained
compliance at this time.
MR. BRUGGER: My name is John Brugger. I'm an attorney who
was retained back in July to represent Dr. Francois in moving forward
with his progress on this building.
He acquired the building back in 2005, and as Michelle noted, it
had roof damage. There was a fire damage. He had made application
to the county for a building permit for remodeling, repairing the
building. The building was found structurally sound except for the
roof.
The permits, to the best of my knowledge, have been approved
except for a condition that an SDP had to be obtained for the building.
At the time Dr. Francois looked into, because it was the
Immokalee planning district, to getting an SIP. He had retained Blair
Foley, a local engineer, to meet with the county. They actually held a
meeting on May 4th of 2006, at which time it was determined that an
SDP should be obtained.
Dr. Francois being a busy practitioner, turned things over to the
engineer. I've got a letter here. I've got a couple letters which I'd like
to enter into evidence, one of which is a letter from--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Excuse me one moment, I need to
have that accepted as an evidence packet.
MR. KELL Y: I make a motion to accept the evidence.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
Page 132
16 l,f1 '2
. ~ /,
November 29,2007
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
MR. BRUGGER: Dr. Francois, being a professional, hired a
professional to undertake the work for him and was relying on him.
I've got a letter here that I'm passing out, dated October 25th, 2006, in
which Mr. Foley acknowledges that he was retained back in April to
undertake this work. He's had a number of meetings with different
planning consultants, an architect, et cetera, to move forward, and that
the work should be completed in 30 to 60 days, taking into
consideration that the holidays were ahead and you know. So Dr.
Francois thought something early 2007 would be the result.
He made a number of phone calls to the engineer, got no
response. And in July of2007 he came in and discussed with me what
he had to do to move this matter forward because he wasn't getting a
response from his engineer.
I do quite a bit of development work for a number of clients and
understood the procedure and how things had to move along. I
attempted to contact Mr. Foley several times by telephone, got no
response. I think he was out of town for a period of time.
I finally wrote a letter to him demanding -- and this was in, I'd
say, late July -- demanding a response, because Dr. Francois had
signed an agreement with him for engineering services, had paid the
retainer fees and undertaken what he was supposed to do.
We then received in response to that, Mr. Foley put together a
summation of where he stood. We had a meeting on August 24th of
2007, at which time he assured me that he thought he could get this
Page 133
16 , A 3
November 29, 2007
done in the next 30 to 60 days, but he needed some things
accomplished. One of which, and I don't know the reason, but there
were architectural renderings required, they had not been submitted to
him.
I immediately brought in an architect. We got renderings done,
turned over to Mr. Foley, and in -- by mid-October he returned all the
documents to me for review before they were submitted.
At the time he gave them to me, I noted a concern I had on a survey
that was included. It turned out that a portion of this building, which
had stood there for years, encroached eight feet onto adjoining
property .
And I went back to the individuals, I told them that that
encroachment is going to have to be removed. The county is not going
to grant a variance to allow you to hold eight feet of your building on
an adjoining property.
When we noted that, I returned it to J.D. Allen, who was the
architect. He was out oftown for two weeks. Mr. Allen had to correct
the renderings on the building to remove the footprint because the
materials that had been provided to him showed that the building was
all within the boundaries of the property.
That was accomplished as of about two weeks ago. Items were
returned to Mr. Foley, and Mr. Foley has promised, as he has in the
past, that we would have things ready to file before Christmas.
Based upon his past history, I can't guarantee that will happen.
But I can't agree with, you know, Dr. Francois has been pursuing
this diligently. I can't agree with the county's position on tearing the
building down. He's got over $20,000 invested in engineering fees,
survey fees, architect fees, and he was relying on the professionals
who were doing the work for him.
Also, I would like to note, my understanding from Dr. Francois
was that the county had agreed to a fine of $50 a day, not $250 at the
prior hearing.
Page 134
16 I~NovAber~9 2007
,
We understand we're under a time gun, and we're pushing to get
it accomplished.
Do you have any comment to add?
MS. ARNOLD: I don't know -- the order that I'm reading says
250 per day. So I don't know what Mr. Francois is referring to.
MR. LETOURNEAU: We have a stipulated agreement also that
was signed agreeing to a $250 a day fine.
DR. FRANCOIS: How much was it, 250 or--
MR. LETOURNEAU: Two-fifty.
DR. FRANCOIS: Because I was under the impression it was $50,
that's what, you know, I heard that day, so--
MR. BRUGGER: I wasn't present, so if he signed it, I guess it is
250 a day.
MS. ARNOLD: Yeah, it says 250.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I don't recall us changing it.
MS. ARNOLD: The only way it would have been changed if
there was an amendment to the order to change that amount. Because
the stipulation does says 250 and the board's order says 250.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Jeff, do you have anything to
add?
MR. LETOURNEAU: Yes. They tried to acquire a permit to get
this structure fixed up back in June 16th of2005. They haven't taken
any action on this permit since the last action on this thing was May of
2006. So that's 18 months this thing has been sitting here without any
action by the owner.
I'd like to submit as evidence a note from the fire inspector
declaring this structure a dangerous structure, which I agree with,
because, from what the pictures we got yesterday, it appears that
possible homeless people are living in this right now and who knows
what else is going on. It's on the Main Street of!mmokalee. It's just a
total blight to the whole city.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: You're going to add the pictures
Page 135
161 A 3
November 29,2007
in with your packet too, please.
MR. LETOURNEAU: Yes. What I'll do is this will be County
Exhibit A. I'll drop off a copy to the respondent here.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: May I have a motion to --
MR. DEAN: Motion to accept A.
MR. MORGAN: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
MR. LETOURNEAU: This is the fire inspector's note. I've only
got one set of pictures right here, so I'll let them take a look at it, see if
they have any objection to these pictures being submitted as evidence.
MR. BRUGGER: I guess my only comment is as part ofthe
building permit, we have had structural engineers look at the building
and the building has been found to be structurally safe. The fire
department has passed the permit application.
The only thing holding up the permit approval, to my
understanding, is the fact that the SDP process had to be undertaken.
We've got copies of the documents here, as of April 14th, where they
respond to all the comments of the building department. And the only
condition left undone is the SDP, which as I explained, we shortly
hope to apply for.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is this going to be Packet B for
the county, please? I need to make a motion.
MR. DEAN: I'll make a motion to accept Packet B.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I have a second?
MR. DEAN: A was in, this is B.
Page 136
I~
16 I /' '1'~
Novembe'f29,2007
MS. MARKU: A is the exhibit that--
MR. DEAN: I've got A in my hand --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Two different groups.
MR. DEAN: That's A, that's B.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have a motion, and do I have a
second?
MR. LEFEBVRE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The original application, though,
that was approved, was back in '06, correct?
MR. BRUGGER: The original agreement, the stipulation with
the board here?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: You said that you had gone
through planning and that you had to do an SDP. That was back in '06,
was that not?
MR. BRUGGER: Yes, ma'am. April 13, 2006 was the last letter
from the county setting forth the final requirements to issue the
building permit. And the final requirement was that an SDP would be
required.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Because I'm wondering with the
roof being open how much wear has been added to the building
structure.
MR. BRUGGER: We've actually had a structural engineer out
Page 13 7
1~ I A 3
November 29,2007
there within the last 60 days as a part of the process because I said
before I get involved I want to make sure that the building could be
structurally sound, are we wasting our time and money here.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's pertinent, thank you.
MR. BRUGGER: I guess our request would be if it would be
possible to grant -- it's going to take -- if in fact Mr. Foley gets this
application completed, the engineering work that has to be done, I've
done everything I can, the architect has done his -- if we can get an
application in within 45 days, because I can't guarantee with the
holidays that he's going to get done when I've been pushing him all
along.
After that I would assume it's going to take six months for the
county to comment and approve an SDP, at which time I don't know
where the county would stand on the building permit, whether there
have been code modification that have to be brought up.
But I would request a reduction in the daily fine while this
process continues. Dr. Francois has invested a lot oftime and money
in the engineering and has been the unfortunate recipient of poor
consultation with his professionals.
MR. LETOURNEAU: I would just like to point out again that it's
been 18 months since anything's been done on this property, that
they've tried to move forward on anything on this property.
I can take into consideration that they had some problems with
the people they hired, but if I had a daily fine hanging over my head, I
would think I would look into other --
MR. BRUGGER: I think there's been several problems. One is
Dr. Francois is sort of a quiet individual, and I think that the engineers,
I've found, respond to who's yelling at them the loudest and who needs
the work done. And he received the letter, sat back and trusted the
deadlines that he was provided. It was only when I became involved
and start raising Cain that progress started to progress.
In addition, in the time frame -- I can understand what happened
Page 138
16 i "-
ii c
November 29, 2007
with Mr. Foley, I'm certain, because I'm a development attorney, Lee
County had a jump in impact fees that took effect in January of 2007,
so he probably put aside other work to get his Lee County developers
in. And then Collier County has the same thing occurring now, if you
don't have an application in before January, 2006, your impact fees are
going up. And poor Dr. Francois gets shuffled to the side unless
somebody is riding the engineer hard.
MR. LETOURNEAU: One more point I'd like to make is this fire
occurred on May 24th, 2003, so this building has been sitting out on
Main Street Immokalee for approximately four and a half years in this
condition.
MR. DEAN: Can I ask what the use of that building was? What
was there?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It was a restaurant.
MR. DEAN: Restaurant? Still is?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: No, it's empty --
DR. FRANCOIS: It was a grocery store --
MR. LEFEBVRE: Grocery store.
MR. DEAN: It's a grocery store now?
MR. LETOURNEAU: I thought it was some type of convenience
store, wasn't it?
MR. PONTE: Beer, cigarettes, groceries.
MR. MORGAN: Make sure somebody isn't living there.
Jeff, what does the interior look like?
MR. LETOURNEAU: It's totally gutted -- you know --
MR. MORGAN: Inside?
MR. LETOURNEAU: Inside it's been burnt.
MR. MORGAN: Is there any structural members inside that's
been damaged?
MR. LETOURNEAU: Yeah, the whole inside's pretty much
burnt --
MR. MORGAN: I mean, supporting the roof or rafters or trusses
Page 139
C,' ~J,' A
1 :,. .
,f' . i1
,"'" '
~L1) il i
.:'
November 29,2007
or --
MR. LETOURNEAU: I think that the hold-up they had was that
when they went to submit this permit that more than 40 percent of it
was destroyed by the fire, if that gives you any indication. That's why
the hold-up was, they had to get the site dev -- no, that's --
DR. FRANCOIS: Actually, no. Only the roof was damaged. It's a
block building.
MS. HART: My name is Jacqueline Hart, for the record. Because
once it's 40 or close to 50 percent, then they would require you to do
just actually more than that, pretty much tear down the building. But it
was not 40 percent damaged.
And just for the record, Dr. Francois obtained the property of
2005. He assumed the responsibility, or the headache, with the
property. So he's trying his best to get this accomplished.
And when we applied for the permit, the permit was for the repair
of the damage -- the fire damage; however, during the permitting
review process, that's when they realized that an SDP or an SIP was
required in order to pursue the permit. And that's why the hold-up.
But everything has been approved on the permitting process side
of it. I just wanted to clear it up.
MR. LETOURNEAU: Everything hasn't been approved,
otherwise it would have been issued.
MS. HART: It's just waiting for the SDP, Jeff.
MR. LETOURNEAU: Eighteen months.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Jeff, have you actually been
inside?
MR. LETOURNEAU: No, I haven't been inside. I've just -- you
can see through like the cracks of the windows and stuffwhat's going
on.
MR. BRUGGER: It's been boarded up to prevent people--
MR. LETOURNEAU: It has been boarded, yes.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: You say it's been boarded up, so
Page 140
i61A 3
November 29,2007
you can't see through the windows.
MR. DEAN: So you can't get in.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Any other questions?
MR. BRUGGER: Again, I feel he's very close to being able to
make the application for the SDP, and he was just too passive in the
previous, you know, pursuit of it, having turned it over to other people
to handle it for him. He has paid their fees, everything's been
accomplished.
I would request a little leniency, and give him a little bit more
time. Certainly not go to the extreme of tearing the building down.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions from the
board?
(No response.)
MR. LEFEBVRE: I just have a comment.
Again, it's been going on for 18 months. This building has had a
fire in 2003. Again, four and a half years. I understand that the
respondent took possession ofthis building in 2005. But I feel that,
without the pun, but we need to keep his feet to the fire and make sure
that this property is repaired and repaired in a timely fashion.
And I don't feel that he has taken responsibility and kept on this
and made sure that if you hire professionals, you can fire them if
they're not doing their job. And I feel that hasn't been the case. He
hasn't looked at this as a priority. And he needs to do that. And by
keeping the fine as is and running, when everything is said and done
and the permits are issued and the property comes into compliance,
then he can come back to us.
But I feel that it's still important to keep these fines as is and
runnmg.
MR. BRUGGER: I understand your feeling, but I'd -- when we
talked about replacement when Dr. Francois contacted me back in
July, I looked at the issues and called some other engineers I talked to,
they couldn't fit in commencing it in their schedule for another three
Page 141
J.bi
November 29,2007
months.
So I made the decision that the quickest way to finalize the
matter was to keep pursuing it with the existing professionals, simply
because the other people wouldn't fit it into their schedule for an
extended period.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Are there any other comments,
questions? If not, I'm going to close -- Michelle?
MS. ARNOLD: I just wanted to kind ofsurnmarize. There is the
request to impose fines at a rate of 250 per day. You have a couple of
requests on the table, one of which is -- I think I heard was to reduce
the fines to $50 per day and grant additional time to come into
compliance, and the other one was to abate the -- or modify the order
as well, if you're going to modify to give additional time to give the
option to the county to remove the structure.
So those are all the things that you have on the table for consideration.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: A, B or C. Okay. At this time I'm
going to close the public hearing and go to the board. And as Michelle
just explained, we have three options.
MR. PONTE: Well, there's a fourth, isn't there? The fourth one is
that when we modify then we could also modify and give extended
time for the demolition. I agree with Gerald, that the fining should
continue just as is, but I have some feeling -- sympathy with the fact
that $20,000 has been invested here already and that to tear down the
building at the end of having invested $20,000 is not only
counterproductive, it doesn't make very much sense.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We don't have to grant the
modification.
MR. PONTE: So that we -- I understand that. So that we could
extend the time with the fine running at 250 per day until such time as
the permits are all received and in hand, and perhaps that's only 60 or
90 days from now. And then come back and apply for reduction, if
things are stalled.
Page 142
'''If'I'
Q ~f '_f'
" (,4J'~ ""1"
"'C).. tI', ..,
~overnb~29,2007
But to say okay, it's time, the clock's ticked, we're starting
demolition ofthe building tomorrow, I don't think that serves the
community, actually.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Well, I don't think it serves the
community to have a blight in the middle of downtown either --
MR. PONTE: Oh, I agree. I agree with you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- and it's been there since 2003.
MR. PONTE: I agree.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I empathize with Mr. Francois in
the fact that his professional has not handled this in a timely manner,
but I'm going to chastise Mr. Francois in that he didn't get on the
phone or something and say why aren't you getting this done for me?
Because I know that's what I would do. You were a little bit too
complacent or too busy, one of the two.
You need to get on and to get it finished, because I think there's
an alternative here. We can continue to let the fines go as their going,
give them X amount of time to complete it. If they haven't got it done
in that time frame, then grant the county the right to have the choice to
tear it down.
MR. PONTE: Yes, I'd agree to that. I think that's what I'm
saymg.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Because we've got to do
something and make it stick.
MR. PONTE: Yeah.
MR. MORGAN: From the photographs that I've seen and from
testimony, I agree with the county, remove it. It needs to be torn
down.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: But the gentleman has spent
$20,000. They said --
MR. MORGAN: There's a lot of people spend a lot of money.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: They just said that they had an
engineer within the last 60 days?
Page 143
TO/A
r:""'i';"
,c-l.
iJ
...'
November 29,2007
MR. BRUGGER: He told us the application --
MR. MORGAN: Has he been inside and taken photographs,
taken measurements?
MR. BRUGGER: He didn't take photographs. He did a personal
visit. He did not take photographs.
MR. MORGAN: He just walked through the building.
MR. BRUGGER: He's been a structural engineer for 50 years,
yes.
MR. MORGAN: Did he make an analysis of the inside structure?
MR. BRUGGER: He told me that, in his opinion, by placing a
new -- the walls were structurally sound, the building needed a new
roof and everything would be okay.
MR. MORGAN: I still agree with the county.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'll entertain motions or
suggestions as to how we want to do this imposition of fines and the
other two orders that are -- requests that are out there.
MR. LEFEBVRE: We might be able to have come to an
agreement here by having it stated that within a certain time frame, if,
again, they do not get the building permitted and CO'd and so forth,
that it can be torn down. So that ultimately that would be the end
result, Jerry, and I think that would take care of all the issues.
I guess the question would be what would be your time frame for
having the building CO'd.
MR. BRUGGER: Could I suggest that we would be given 60
days to get the SDP finalized because of the holidays. As I said, he's
promised me it would be before Christmas, but I can't rely on that. So
we would have 60 days to get the SDP submitted to the county -- well,
the approval period is going to take six months probably from the
county for an approval.
I can't guarantee -- again, we've hired a professional engineering
who has experience with the county working with Collier County, and
hopefully the matters are all there. But I'm doing three other SDPs
Page 144
'f,"6..'."~ ~
I. IJ
,:::i!,~ {,. .
November , 2007
right now, they come back for comments after about 45 days, it takes
30 days to respond. Sometimes you get a second set of comments.
So I'm saying it's probably going to take another six !l;lonths after
that to get the SDP approved with the county.
MR. LEFEBVRE: I don't think in this case we can do a blanket
one year and get everything done, because the SDP has to be reviewed
by the county, and you can't penalize the respondent for the time it
takes the county.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is there a guarantee that an SDP
will be granted, Michelle?
MS. ARNOLD: I think that there's no guarantees, but they're--
that was the recommendation from the county that they pursue that, so
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It's plausible then that they --
MS. ARNOLD: -- it's something that they believe is -- yeah, it's
plausible, feasible.
MR. BRUGGER: There's been actually a meeting held with the
county where you have the, you know, pre-SDP meeting, the planning
session meeting, and that was what was suggested. And in my review
of it, I didn't see anything adverse. We've had to make some
modification to include surface water management that wasn't there.
But in speaking with the engineer, the property can be brought into
compliance and there should be no problem.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Can we maybe structure it where it's 60 days
for SDP to be submitted, and then upon any comments regarding SDP,
let's say --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Upon approval of the SDP.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Well, I don't want to say approval, because if
there's comments to be made on the SDP and it takes -- I want to have
a time from for any comments, that they have to come back within a
certain amount of time with those comments. Because they could just
hang up and just sit there.
Page 145
I 6 -I,' ,1-
Novelnbef~9, 2007
So ifthere's any comments from the county regarding SDP, they
must be resubmitted within --
MR. BRUGGER: I'd agree to 30 days for resubmittal.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Within 30 days. And upon approval of the
SDP, X amount of time to pull permits. And then from there--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: She said the permits are all ready
to go except for the SDP.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Okay. All right, then--
MR. BRUGGER: Well, the one thing I would suggest is that we
know during that period whether the county will keep this permit
active or whether or not it has to be brought up to -- whether there's
been code changes.
Because if we feel comfortable we're getting an SDP, there
should be no reason that the permit shouldn't be verified, you know,
that we don't go back and argue over building permits issues then.
MR. LEFEBVRE: When was the permit issued?
MR. BRUGGER: Well, the last comment letter was April 16th of
2006. So it's been a year --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: There's no permit.
MR. LEFEBVRE: There's no permit issued.
MR. KELLY: I have a question. What happens if they miss one
of these deadlines? They're already being fined. Do you fine them
more? Or what is the purpose of all the individual deadlines?
MS. ARNOLD: It sounds like you're recommending to modify
your order to grant additional time. So we would not be imposing
fines today, it would be granting additional time.
MS. RAWSON: I was going to ask you that. Based on your
discussion, I mean, we're here on a request for imposition of fines --
MR. BRUGGER: I would suggest that if we don't make those
deadlines, that the county can come back and bring us here to bring
forward their motion to tear the building down.
MR. KELL Y: I would just make a motion that we impose the
Page 146
!l1 "%
. i, f Novemb& 29, 2007
fines and that we allow the county to, at its decision, decide what to do
with this building, let's say six months from now or nine months from
now.
And then the county, based upon the progress, can decide at that
point whether, hey, another couple of months this thing is going to be
fine and they're going to rebuild it or there's no progress, we need to
remove this structure.
MR. PONTE: Does that mean that we would have to modify our
order where it says -- where the demolition is part of the original
order? So if --
MR. BRUGGER: I don't think demolition, that isn't part of the
existing order, is it? No, you're seeking it now.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It was crossed out. Jean, can we
do that?
MS. RAWSON: I was just asking like where you're going.
Because we are here on a request for an imposition of fines. You don't
have to do that, you can turn this into the modification of the order. I
just need to know what--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Which way we're going?
MS. RAWSON: Right.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We were told we had like -- they
were requesting us to reduce the fine, and we've kind of pretty much
threw that one out.
We were going to, I think, impose the fines and then modify the
order in lieu with -- in other words, they're wanting to tear down the
building, but we know that he's invested 20,000. So we're trying to
give him a little bit of leeway in saying that we're going to let this
continue, we're going to impose the fines as they are now, let it
continue, but then modify our order to state that if in six to nine
months, whatever we decide, that if they have not made enough
progress, then we would allow the county to then demolish the
building on their discretion with how much progress is being made.
Page 147
."
_:" A 3
November 29,2007
So we're kind of combining two things. Are we allowed to do
that? That was my question.
MS. RAWSON: Well, I think it's probably going to require two
orders.
MS. ARNOLD: Well, and I think that there might be some, I
guess, unfairness to the property owner, because then we're going to
allow fines to accrue for another six months and then additional costs
for the demolition would be compounded on top of that. So --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We want to encourage him to
hold his feet to the fire.
MS. ARNOLD: I understand.
MR. KELL Y: Would the county be willing to just pull this
imposition of fines and bring it back in six, nine months, after you
determine whether or not progress has been made?
MS. ARNOLD: I would rather the board, if that's -- if you're
wanting to grant them that time, I would rather you modify your order
to grant them that time so that we're not placing a lien on their
property for this amount --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: In other words, you don't want us
to impose the fines and extend the time, you want us to do one or the
other.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Let me ask another pretty important question.
Are you looking to finance any of this work?
DR. FRANCOIS: It will be a small portion. I mean, to clarify
something, I already spent over $40,000 in the process. Before the first
permit that I was trying to get through the county I spent over
$20,000.
The $20,000 dollars that my lawyer is talking about, that's what I
already give to Mr. Foley. So over $40,000 is already spent, you
know, in the process.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Again, a question. Are you going to finance
any of these repairs? Because if you do and we impose a fine, it is
Page 148
16 I m
NovembJ29,2007
going to be on record and that might impinge on your financing.
DR. FRANCOIS: Yes, I will finance, you know, part of it.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have an idea. That we not
impose the fine at this time, that we modify our order. And this is --
I'm just throwing out as an idea, guys. In six months if not significant
progress has been made, to then allow the county to demolish the
building.
MR. LEFEBVRE: I would agree with that.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's not a motion that I can
make.
MR. LEFEBVRE: I'd like -- I'd like to make a motion to amend
our order where it states ifthere's not sufficient improvement or
progress made to getting permits and so forth, that the county will be
allowed to demolish the building.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Within--
MR. LEFEBVRE: Within six months, thank you.
MR. BRUGGER: At their discretion?
MR. LEFEBVRE: At their discretion.
MR. BRUGGER: I'd like to remove the word improvement, but
progress --
MR. LEFEBVRE: Yes, progress.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I have a second?
MR. PONTE: I will second that motion.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
MR. MORGAN: I disagree.
Page 149
tift A
161 3
November 29, 2007
MS. RAWSON: I need some clarification. Ifwe are modifying
the order that you entered back in October, which gave them one year
till October 26th, 2007, and now you are giving them an additional six
months, that's additional six months from today's date?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: From today's date.
MS. RAWSON: And you're adding one more part of your order
in the alternative the county may demolish --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Demolish the building.
MR. KELLY: So they're technically not in violation now.
MS. RAWSON: Correct. They wouldn't be--
MS. ARNOLD: They're in violation but the fines aren't accruing.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: They're in violation but the fines
are not accruing, so there are no fines at this time.
MR. BRUGGER: Thank you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And with that, can we adjourn for
lunch?
MS. ARNOLD: For how long?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: One hour, thirty minutes? Is there
still a little Subway shop? It's after lunchtime, so everybody else is
gone.
So why don't we adjourn for 30 minutes and we'll be back here at
2:40.
(A lunch break was taken.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We'll get started. Go ahead and
call this meeting back to order. And I guess we'll be hearing the
Blocker case next.
MR. WHITE: I appreciate the reminder. And I would like to
thank the board for allowing us to table the discussion about our
motion and to take the time to fully consider not only that but if we get
as far as the fines aspect of it.
And before I would forget, I would also like to thank you for last
month's continuance to allow us to come back today. I appreciate that.
Page 150
16' I A ~
November 29;'2007
I think where we had left off, if my recollection serves, is that
there was a discussion about the zoning determination and whether in
fact one had been made officially or otherwise by staff.
And as a point of concern from the original hearing back in April
of last, my recollection is in review of the record was there wasn't a
professional planning opinion. And all of that said, today we're at a
place where I'm asking for your consideration of a provision in the
Land Development Code where I'm only aware of most recently there
being some concern based upon what were the then known facts in
law by the county's professional staff.
It's not part ofthese proceedings, it's not part ofthe record, but it
wasn't until, I believe, September of this year that I was apprised of
what, if any, concerns the county may have had about the SIP process.
The reason why we weren't more emphatic about it, I believe,
before when we spoke to you at our rehearing is because we were not
then presently able to effectively apply for and utilize the SIP process.
One of the reasons we asked for our continuance had to do with what I
had mentioned earlier, was the receipt of quitclaim deeds just this past
Tuesday on the board's agenda, Board of County Commissioners'
agenda.
Those quitclaim deeds will become effective after tomorrow
when we sign the Florida Department of Protection's consent order.
Because it's condition ofthe approval of the quitclaim deeds that we
sign the consent order.
That makes sense from the county's perspective because one of
the issues that had been holding up the whole discussion about the
clean-up was who owned the right-of-way, and more so, who had the
responsibility to clean up those tires and junk cars.
MS. ARNOLD: Can I object? Because that has nothing to do
with the Blocker case. Tires on a right-of-way has nothing to do with
the case of the illegal land use that was brought before you all. Ijust
wanted to state that.
Page 151
f"^"':, ' tl,
J .., fl ""r'
N~veinber~9, 21107
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Michelle, I understand your
contention, but I think part of the board's opinion at the time and I
think what he's trying to refer to is we were concerned about the safety
because of the tires and the junk cars that were so close to the
residents' homes at that time. And we pointed that out. So I think that's
what he's reflecting.
MR. WHITE: That's absolutely correct, Madam Chair. And
further to that, I note, and the deed's not here -- and I have
photographs that were taken about six weeks ago of that clean-up as
well as one other piece of information I'd like to put into evidence, if I
may.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, that would be packet --
MR. WHITE: I guess this would be our B.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Does county have an objection?
MS. ARNOLD: I have not seen anything.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Would you like to look at them
first?
MS. ARNOLD: That would be nice.
MR. LEFEBVRE: What relevancy do these pictures have to --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm sorry. He asked what was the
relevancy of the pictures. And I said I think it's because he's trying to
show that they've cleaned up some of the area that's close to the
mobile homes. And that was one of their safety issues that we had in
concern at the original hearing.
MR. WHITE: I'm presenting them presently for the purpose of
demonstrating how we now are able to meaningfully participate in the
site improvement plan process. And without --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We need to have a motion made
whether or not to accept the packet.
MR. DEAN: Motion to accept the packet.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear a second?
MR. PONTE: I'll second.
Page 152
.....
161 A 3
November 29, 2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. PONTE: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
MR. WHITE: Thank you.
And part of that packet -- yes, thank you. There are three
separate photographs. Feel --
MR. LEFEBVRE: They're all copies, correct?
MR. WHITE: Yes.
MS. ARNOLD: I have to object to the second part of it. Again,
because -- well, the objection is the health department's rules have
nothing to do with the county zoning rules. And that's the other thing
that's being--
MR. KELL Y: Is that a separate packet?
MR. WHITE: That was part of what I was looking to bring in.
And if Michelle wants to make a separate objection to that, that's fine.
I'm happy to --
MS. ARNOLD: And I guess I need clarification from the
attorneys on what we're really doing, because I thought this was a
motion to modify the board's order. And it looks like we're getting
additional evidence that wasn't considered previously at the original
hearings. It's almost like a continuation of a hearing that -- I'm not
really clear what we're doing.
MR. WHITE: I can answer that. I'm sorry, Jeff--
MR. WRIGHT: I would like to get into that --let me pipe in a
syllable or two here. The -- earlier we had a discussion today on when
Page 153
16 Ot' '~~:
November 29, 20cr1
would it be appropriate to amend an order. And I agree with Michelle
and Ms. Rawson's comments that it would be appropriate where
there's a clear error or maybe where there's a health and safety issue,
or it's just manifestly unjust the way it is.
And I don't think that there would be any question that it would
be appropriate to amend an order here.
Mr. White, I think, is pointing out a lot ofthings that don't fall
into any of those categories. And I just wanted to point out that, since
the hearing, and I don't know if this is my rebuttal or not, but I want to
get this on the record, since the April, '06 hearing, there was a motion
for rehearing, as you know.
There was a mediation. That didn't go so well, apparently,
because Mr. White has appealed the results ofthat mediation--
MR. WHITE: I have appealed the way that the county handled
the consideration of it.
MR. WRIGHT: And then he's also petitioned the Board of
County Commissioners for relief last Tuesday and pulled it off the
agenda at the last minute and got a continuance at the last meeting.
And Michelle Arnold noted on the record at the last meeting that it
had been pulled twice from the agenda.
So I just want to keep the focus of the board on the issue at hand.
And that is, is it appropriate to modify this order.
And I haven't heard any error pointed out. I haven't heard any
health, safety issues. In fact, Mr. White just pointed out that, based on
these photos, the health, safety issues have been addressed. So there's
no burning building to take care of. And I don't see any grounds on
which a modification would be appropriate.
What I see, if I count them up, how many bites of the apple that
Mr. White is asking for, I'm going to have to start using both of my
hands, because it's been at least five bites.
And I'd also point out, I want to get this on the record too, this
order that he's asking you to modify is presently on appeal in the
Page 154
1, )1 ~
November 19,2007
circuit court.
MR. WHITE: That's not correct.
MR. WRIGHT: I have the appeal here. And if! may read an
excerpt from it.
Nature of relief sought. In the alternative, petitioner seeks to have
its notice of appeal of the CEB's order considered immediately then
filed. Basically --
MR. WHITE: At which point it would then be considered. So it
is more legally correct to say it's not.
MR. WRIGHT: I'd defer to your own attorney on this particular
point. But the caption of the appeal is: Petition for Writ of Certiorari
based on the BCC's handling, or, in the alternative, notice of appeal of
the very orders he's asking you to modify. So he's already submitted
an appeal.
And I'd defer to Ms. Rawson that when you plead in the
alternative it's an either/or. They can be mutually exclusive. But you
are pleading, you're laying it out there. So he -- I'm really not sure
what the result of this hearing -- if for example you were to approve
his modification, whether or not that would mean that he would be
sticking with the appeal of the prior orders or would he change this to
the modified order that you would issue? I'm to really sure.
And maybe, Mr. White, you want to put on record right now that
your notice of appeal is withdrawn. Because otherwise, it's in the
court, it's under consideration by the court, and you represented earlier
that it's not. But I just wanted to point out that it is.
So that's some comments I wanted to get on the record, so you
weren't --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That refers back to my original
request at the beginning, and I was told by our counsel that we should
listen to what the Blockers' attorney had to say, which is what I think
we were doing, was indulging him.
As to whether or not we would even consider making a
Page 155
i6 / u( ~
~_#
November 29,2007
modification, we were just trying to listen to what he had to say.
I did caution before the break, though, that I didn't want to be
rehearing this case. And I don't want to rehear the case, because it's
not a rehearing, it's asking for a modification. So I'm kind of like
going to look for Jean, and also Mr. Kelly has a comment that he
would like to submit.
MS. RAWSON: If your original order of the Code Enforcement
Board is up on appeal, you have no jurisdiction to modify it --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We can't do anything, okay.
MS. RAWSON: -- and I don't know whether it's up on appeal or
not. So I would look to the county attorney for that. He's apparently
got a copy of it with him.
But if it looks like they've appealed your order, you have no
jurisdiction to hear the case.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We can't do anything.
MR. WHITE: May I clarify?
This is going to take a while. I told you this is a complex case
and it has a long procedural history.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: One simple question for you.
MR. WHITE: Yes.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Per the county's attorney, this case
has been appealed --
MR. WHITE: That is not correct.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- is that true?
MR. WHITE: That is not correct. Unless and until the court
determines that the relief we've requested originally, which has to do
with the special magistrate's consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners, is not going to be granted, it cannot be considered
filed until that point.
And if! were to, under Chapter 70, which is the special
magistrate proceeding for this type of alternative relief, if I filed that
notice of appeal, I effectively have lost the jurisdiction of the
Page 156
T?> A 3
November 29,2007
magistrate proceeding.
They are alternatives to each other. And what the statute says is if
you come in and you file a notice of appeal, which I have not done, I
have done it in the alternative and alerted the court, because the time
frame between when the court may choose to deny the relief I'm
seeking as part of the magistrate proceeding, if that's denied, then
instantaneously the clock starts to run for the time for me to file my
notice of appeal.
And I only have 30 days from the original order that you entered.
And my concern is that by the time I actually get the Court's order, my
time to have appealed would have expired. Because I think that there's
a good argument that the county may have -- and I hate having to tell
them the tactics that are their best defense in my filed case -- but if!
don't plead it in the alternative, I don't have the opportunity for
making sure that the window doesn't close on my 30 days, that
everybody says I have, before I file my notice of appeal.
It is not technically filed unless and until the court denies the
otherwise requested relief. Because that continues the magistrate
proceeding, which I expect will remand it, send it back to the Board of
County Commissioners to dispose of. Because that statutory process
says that it doesn't end until the Board of County Commissioners have
disposed of that special magistrate's order -- or report, excuse me.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: You have met with the magistrate
once, though, correct?
MR. WHITE: Yeah, we did. That was -- took forever to get
going, and when we finally did --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And that case you're appealing,
correct?
MR. WHITE: I'm appealing not that but rather the way that the
Board of County Commissioners considered it. We didn't have a
chance to appear at that consideration. We didn't have any notice, so --
we never got to put our side of the story before the Board of County
Page 157
;'r; i! A '"7
." I. ~
Novembef29, 2007
..
Commissioners.
And I __ to tell you what would the result be, my belief is that I
may be able to convince my client that if we enter into the SIP
process, that we withdraw all of those things.
And in fact, the reason why I tell you that this is a complex
matter is because up until near the end of July I was working with the
county attorney's office, Administrator Schmitt, on a compliance
agreement, the significance of which is, if you go back to the
provision I showed you out of the LDC, the alternative way by which
we can have the SIP process entered into is one that's reached by
compliance agreement.
And we spent months working on that in coordination with the
efforts regarding the DEP and the consent order.
So some of the characterizations we really haven't been doing
anything to try to abate these violations, I just can't agree with. We've
been very busy.
Now, what's the reference the photos--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- the legal round, and some
clean-up. So I won't say you haven't been doing anything.
But Jean, I need some general direction, because I've got two --
MS. RAWSON: I can tell you -- again, I haven't seen the appeal
and so I'm just going to give you some general overall rules oflaw. If
you file an appeal of this board's order, you lose jurisdiction. If you
file an appeal in the alternative, and based on the conversation I gather
that he's appealed both the special master--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Magistrate.
MS. RAWSON: -- magistrate's order as well as yours. If you
plead in the alternative, it's as if -- in other words, that's like you have
still lost jurisdiction if you're one of the alternatives.
MR. WHITE: But we won't know what that is, Madam Chair and
board members, until that judge rules.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: But technically then, if you don't
Page 158
t6JnbS 29,3007
know what that is --
MS. RAWSON: When you file -- when you file, you lose
j urisdi cti on.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- we can't know what that is. So
therefore, we can't make a ruling.
MR. WHITE: I wouldn't agree with you. I think it's just the
opposite. You still have jurisdiction until the court says you don't.
MS. RAWSON: I think you'd lose jurisdiction the minute an
appeal is filed. The minute that appeal goes into the clerk's office, it
gets stamped --
MR. WHITE: I have not filed, to my recollection, such a notice.
I'm asking the court to consider it.
MR. WRIGHT: If! may, this does not have a case caption or a
stamped date, but it's captioned Notice of Appeal. I don't know what
case number it is. It's signed by Mr. White, May 24th, saying that he
appeals to the Circuit Court of the 20th Judicial Circuit regarding the
Code Enforcement Board's finding of fact, conclusions of law and
order of the board -- I'm sorry. I can give you a copy of this document,
so -- I was trying to speak --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We couldn't even catch up with
you.
MR. WRIGHT: Bottom line is I have in my hands a notice of
appeal ofthe very cases that he's requesting modification of, signed by
Mr. White, dated May 24th, '07. Maybe he never filed it but this is
what was presented to our office --
MR. WHITE: No, I -- I will put on the record that that is part of
the filing of my petition for Writ of Certiorari, and they're different.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Jean, explain to me what Writ of
Certiorari means.
MS. RAWSON: Petition for Writ of Certiorari is part of your
appeal when you are asking the higher court to reach down and hear a
lower Court's decision. This is not the United States Supreme Court.
Page 159
r 1." .,,,,
! '1:
. .
Novembef 29,2007
That's when you usually hear the Certiorari term used.
But you file a petition of Certiorari because you're asking the
Circuit Court to hear a Code Enforcement Board or a magistrate's
ruling.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So it still takes it out of our hands,
then, doesn't it?
MR. WHITE: No, ma'am.
MS. RAWSON: If it's been filed with the court. In my opinion it
does. If it's been filed at the clerk's office -- and we don't have a filed
stamped copy -- but if it's a petition for Certiorari and that notice of
appeal is attached to it, I don't think you have jurisdiction to do
anything yet.
MR. WHITE: I couldn't object more. And unfortunately, the
reason why this is so critical, not only for your consideration today but
to the rest of our case, because if what you do is effectively consider
me to have appealed the case and argue that you've lost jurisdiction,
you've trumped what the court is being asked to do.
Now, you are loath to step into the shoes of the zoning official
for interpretations of law -- and I just can't tell you how devastating
the effect would be to make that ruling. Because the way that the
Chapter 70 statute works is very precise, it tells you --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do we have a copy ofthat?
MR. WHITE: Chapter 70?
MR. WRIGHT: Yes, ma'am. In fact, I'd like to make this part of
the record, if! could. It's captioned Notice of Appeal submitted by
Patrick White to the Circuit Court.
MR. WHITE: I believe that that, without the rest of the filing, I'm
going to have to object to. It is in and of itself going to be prejudicial
without the rest of the document.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Hang on.
MR. WHITE: The only thing you'll have is something that is
what is Part B of my request, that only becomes legally effective if
Page 160
,I I ~ A
~;v~mber ~~2007
part A is denied.
If my Writ for Certiorari is denied by the Court under the Chapter
70 proceeding and they say there was no error, the Board of County
Commissioners did everything appropriate with regards to that special
magistrate's report, up until that point that notice of appeal is not
considered filed. Because the second it gets filed I've lost the
jurisdiction for the special magistrate proceeding.
So what you would be doing is effectively telling the Court, and I
know you can't do this, that they can't hear what I've asked them to
hear.
And that's why it's of such concern and why I think that -- my
understanding of how that statute is intended to operate. And there's
been a district court of appeal in the Second District that's come out
since that says as long as that magistrate proceeding is going forward
under Chapter 70, that the time is tolled for filing your appeal.
My 30 days, I suspect, could be up by the time I know what the
outcome of the Court's decision is. So in an abundance of caution, to
not have the county come back to me and tell me, sorry, Mr. White,
the window's closed, I filed that as an alternative. I did not separately
file it. It has not activated the Court's time frame to consider your prior
order.
MS. ARNOLD: Jean, is what you're saying or Jeff what you're
saying by filing in the alternative it gives -- it files both motions --
MS. RAWSON: Correct.
MS. ARNOLD: -- and therefore once a decision's made on the
first one, it doesn't --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It mayor may not --
MS. ARNOLD: It doesn't extinguish that 30-day period that he's
concerned about that would toll his appeal.
MS. RAWSON: No, it doesn't.
MS. ARNOLD: So they can consider it right after. But
essentially he's filed both motions, is that what you're saying?
Page 161
.- A
1~' , ~
November 2"9,2007
MS. RAWSON: I think that's what he said. All I have in my hand
is a notice of appeal dated the 29th day of May, 2007.
MR. WHITE: And the problem with that is it seems to suggest to
you that what I've done is cut off my own nose to spite my face, which
of course I have not done. I have not filed a notice of appeal. I am not
telling the court that I'm appealing.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Let me see if! understand what
Jean's trying to tell us. By you filing as you have in --
MS. RAWSON: The alternative.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Alternative means that if A
doesn't go through, your B is then considered.
MR. WHITE: Then B.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: But because you have done that,
you've tied our hands, in my opinion, in what I'm understanding Jean
to explain. Because if A doesn't go through and then B is considered,
B is our case, and so there -- let me finish.
So therefore unless A is accepted, we are at risk of making a
decision on something that may come up in front of the courts and we
have modified something that they are then going to be considering,
and that's going to be null and void anyway. Am I correct, Jean?
MS. RAWSON: I hate to answer your questions in a vacuum,
because I don't really have any of the filings in front of me.
But if you plead in the alternative, they can discount A, go to B,
they can, you know, keep B and throw out A. The alternative means
either one, either/or.
MR. WHITE: No, ma'am. This one is specifically tied to a series
of events that are A and B. You correctly said it, Madam Chairman.
You said if A is denied, only then do they move to B.
They are not a petition for two kinds of relief. If that were true, I
would have filed a separate notice of appeal. I have not done that. And
that is why I strenuously object to any characterization that I did.
You're effectively telling me I would have committed legal
Page 162
"I ',' A 3
J"
~;i! '.....
November 29,2007
malpractice.
MS. RAWSON: Let me say this. I'm really very uncomfortable
with your moving forward and modifying an order when something
has been filed with the Circuit Court like a Writ of Certiorari and
we've not seen it. Unless I see it and can really properly advise you --
and apparently Mr. Wright doesn't have it either -- it's hard for me to
say, oh, well, don't worry about it and let's just go forward.
I have to see it in order to really give you a very good legal opinion.
MR. WHITE: Let me give you a practical outcome. If! had come
to you after the court had ruled, okay, I think that what you're saying
would be absolutely correct. If the court ruled and denied my petition
and started my notice of appeal, you are all absolutely correct,
meaning Jeff and those who see it from that end of the telescope, that I
would have lost jurisdiction.
This is a jurisdictional question and that is why it is so significant
and so important. I don't want you to have lost jurisdiction. If that
were the case, my goodness, what have we been doing trying to
convince you of an alternative way to cure these violations?
And in an abundance of caution, all I would ask you to do is,
even if you're wrong, what's the harm? What's the harm? Is the harm
going to be that I'm going to take you to court and tell you that I don't
want the relief you may give me? Or in the alternative is it going to be
that I'm somehow not going to withdraw my appeal?
I'm telling you on the record under oath that if we have the SIP
relief, we will withdraw it. That was what was in the compliance
agreement back in July.
MS. RAWSON: Let me answer what the harm is. If you don't
have jurisdiction, any order you enter is void.
MR. WHITE: And there is no harm.
MS. RAWSON : You've wasted your time.
MR. WHITE: And the other way for me to cure it is if! withdraw
it before the court rules on it, Madam Chair? That's null and void.
Page 163
Ib j A
NovemJr 29,2007
So I effectively give you the protection, if you will, that you
think you may need, but I'm pretty certain you don't.
MR. WRIGHT: I just want to get a clarification on the record.
I'm a little confused as to how an attorney could sign a notice of
appeal, say it's submitted by me, with a bar number on it --
MR. WHITE: As an attachment.
MR. WRIGHT: As an attachment or however, it went to the clerk
of court. It's now in their hand. And it's captioned Notice of Appeal
submitted by you, and that's not in dispute. To the court, that's not in
dispute.
I'm not sure how there's any other way to interpret it. You could
have zipped it in a ziplock bag, thrown it in as an exhibit. But you
submitted a notice of appeal to the court, period. And it's there.
And I'm not sure if you're denying that. But I think that what you
said on the record is that you did indeed submit that very document,
submitted by you, signed by you, to the Circuit Court. And if that's not
the case, I just want to make sure I've got that right or wrong.
MR. WHITE: Very good arguments, Mr. Wright. But let me ask
you this: Did you check the docket in Circuit Court?
MR. WRIGHT: I did.
MR. WHITE: Does the docket show that I have a running notice
of appeal?
MR. WRIGHT: I'm not really sure. I don't have the docket
memorized.
MR. WHITE: Did you look through the petition for Writ of
Certiorari in the pleading and is it or is it not written in a way that it is
clear how the statutory proceeding under 70 intended to operate, that
you only have jurisdiction under the magistrate up to the point where
you file the notice?
If my notice were filed, I would have cut off my own nose to
spite my face in the petition for Writ of Certiorari. You can't have it
both ways.
Page 164
161 A ~
November19,2007
MR. WRIGHT: That document that's captioned Notice of Appeal
was or was not filed with the clerk of the court?
MR. WHITE: It was filed secondarily to, and would not become
legally effective and operate unless the court denied the petition for
Writ ofCert. That is my answer, sir.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm going to stop here and I'm
going to poll the board just to ask what direction the board wants to
go.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Ifwe just have--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Temporarily I'm closing the
public hearing just to poll the board as to how they want to proceed.
Because I don't want to make this decision myself as to how we want
to go.
MR. PONTE: Personally, I think we're way out of our depth.
This is the Code Enforcement Board, and what we're hearing are legal
arguments between three lawyers about which way to go. I don't think
there's anybody on this board that's qualified to make that decision--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you, George.
MR. PONTE: -- just hearing a legal argument over which we
have no authority or experience.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Madam Chair, if! may give my little input
here also. I feel the same way. I feel that at the minimum we should
continue this until the next hearing, allowing for the attorneys to do a
little bit more research into the court's docket, perhaps, to get the
documents that you need to look at to be sure that the opinions you're
giving are the opinions that you espoused today.
I suggest that we continue this for at least one month.
MR. LEFEBVRE: It would be two months.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Two months. January -- the next hearing,
exactly.
MR. LEFEBVRE: I guess I want to back up a little bit with the
time frame. It came in front of us, we heard the case. Didn't go in
Page 165
ISlA ~
Noverrtber 29,2007
favor of the Blockers, so he went to special magistrate. The special
magistrate upheld --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Actually, he asked for a rehearing
and we denied him. Then he went to the special magistrate.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Thank you. The special magistrate upheld our
decision.
MR. WHITE: Sorry. I know it's not public hearing but I just want
to correct the characterization. I don't think that that's fair.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I remember from discussions
prior, the special magistrate didn't rule on our issue per se according to
the attorney. But he ruled in favor of upholding the basis of it, based
on how it was presented, and they didn't have their right, which is why
he's appealing it.
MR. WHITE: Could I clarify?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: No, I don't want any -- I'm just
trying to make it for our discussion. Thank you.
MR. LEFEBVRE: There was an appeal filed for a procedural
error, whatever case it may be. I feel ifthere was an appeal filed, it
was based on the magistrate made a decision either to support --
whatever, made the decision based on the case.
If you revert back to Steve Lovelace's case, which is a case where
he filed in Circuit Court a day before he was supposed to come back
to us, he asked for a rehearing, and it fell -- our meeting was 31 days
after our previous hearing. So the attorney went and filed in Circuit
Court.
At that point, when Mr. Lovelace and the attorney came in,
which was about a year and a half ago, came in and said I filed in
court, we couldn't hear the case.
So I feel that this would fit under that criteria, that if there was an
appeal it was based on our case, that it's out of our jurisdiction at that
point.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Your input?
Page 166
"']f' IJ ~
,,:< r N~venrl"fer 29 2007
,
MR. DEAN: Well, you know, I can piggyback what Gerald said.
It makes a lot of sense to me. I kind of agree with that. And if I had to
make a decision right now, I'd make a motion for a modification order
to be denied.
Just because it's on my agenda doesn't mean I have to take it. I
mean, I can put it someplace else, and they can go someplace else.
MR. KELL Y: In reference to the opinion as to whether or not
this case -- I think we are able to modify this case, I think because we
modified the order just prior to lunch for Francois, I think we probably
should, only because --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm concerned about the appeals
out there.
MR. KELLY: -- we've done that part. So that's part one.
Part two, I think both sides are strong. However, I think that it does
make procedural sense to have an order have two parts, and the second
part be reliant upon the decision of the first. And I don't think that
second part should be considered as filed until the first is ruled upon.
But I'm not an attorney.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: But that's a legal opinion we're not
qualified to make.
MR. PONTE: We have contradictory advice--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I am comfortable with the thought
of tabling this --
MR. PONTE: We have contradictory advice. Madam Chair, we
have contradictory advice on this. One lawyer has said it is not filed
because it hasn't been accepted by the court or something to that order.
And our attorney is saying it's filed as soon as the clerk receives it.
How are we supposed to make some determination about that?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I am going to lean towards your
decision that we table this until January, have it come back with the
attorneys being able to get all the information together for us,
providing Jean with the documents that she needs to review in order to
Page 167
1'6~1 A ~
November 29,2007
give us a better understanding so that we can then make an educated
ruling one way or the other.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Madam Chair, we are quasi-judicial, not
judicial.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Correct. And we need to listen to
the advice of our attorney. And I don't want to step above and over her
in that guard.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Could we make a ruling --
MS. RAWSON: Did -- I just want to ask a question of Jeff.
Did you get a certificate of service on the Writ of Cert? Because I
know I didn't get it.
MR. WRIGHT: It says certificate of service to David Weigel.
That's how it got to me.
MS. RAWSON: Okay. I haven't seen it. I'm just uncomfortable
because we're talking about documents that I haven't seen.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I am--
MR. WHITE: And I think the reason you haven't seen it, if!
may, Madam Chair, is because the court itself does not consider it to
be a notice of appeal. And if it were, which I'm telling you again, it
can't reach until after the matter's considered by the judge, then the
notice of appeal, then the service would come.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's why I'm leaning towards
thinking the only fair thing to do here is table this until January so that
we can get everybody to have the proper documents that they need to
look at to advise us.
MR. WRIGHT: Madam Chair, if! may, this is -- we're all
conceding here that this is before the court, it may be a contingency
that is before the court, but ultimately the issues he's asking you to
decide are going to be decided by a court.
And I think that when we come back in January we're going to be
stuck with these same legal questions, and they're more appropriate --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Hopefully she'll have seen the
Page 168
'i'I ,if f; n '7
{ ,,' No}kmber 29, 2007
-
documents and can give us some advice as to whether or nOt we could
proceed at all. And that's what I'm looking for.
MR. WRIGHT: I'm afraid that we might be getting an eighth bite
of the apple here.
MS. ARNOLD: And I would speak for the county. I think that's
exactly what we're doing. All of these efforts are delaying any action
whatsoever. And there was one part of your order that was complied
with, a meeting that was attended, and he was given direction at that
time how to comply. No efforts whatsoever have been made to try to
come into compliance with that direction that was given.
MR. WHITE: That is absolutely false. We were not given any
direction --
MS. ARNOLD: Can I speak, Patrick? Because you've allowed
ample time to speak and you've interrupted everybody --
MR. WHITE: I don't have any direction --
MS. ARNOLD: Can I speak --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Excuse me.
MR. WHITE: I don't have any direction.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Excuse me. I'm going to make
everybody stop speaking here in a minute.
MS. ARNOLD: Can I finish, Madam Chair?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Sure.
MS. ARNOLD: There's been arguments about your ability to
amend your order. I don't argue against that. I think you can. The
reasons for amending that order have been given to you. And I think
what he's -- what is being asked of you today is beyond those reasons
that have been granted in prior orders that have been amended.
There's been a request to enter into a site improvement plan
process. That is not something that is afforded to this particular
property because it's zoned inappropriately for that use.
There's been discussion about the compliance agreement process
being another avenue for him to take to get into the site improvement
Page 169
I 6' Jlve~er 29, 2007
plan process, and the county was entering into that. It stopped.
Well, why? Because it's not an adequate avenue for him to
pursue. These are all these --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I don't disagree with you. I agree
with what you're saying. But I am sitting on what I think is more
important is a legal issue as to whether or not we can even move
forward because of a potential appeal that is out there.
And until Jean has a chance to review that or until we can find
out whether or not that his appeal is stated as Mr. White states or if it
states as --
MS. ARNOLD: In the interim, they continue to collect rent on
something since your order has been rendered. And that's my point.
This is just a way to continue to operate in violation of your order.
MR. WHITE: I object.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I feel like my hands are a little bit
tied, Jean. And I'm looking for you, because I really think we need to
__ to do service correctly, we need to look at the legal issue.
MS. RAWSON: Well, here, it's interesting. What Ms. Arnold is
telling you is to deny the motion because it doesn't qualify to be
modified.
My discomfort in your hearing the motion at all is the lack of
jurisdiction. But Mr. White on the other hand is telling you you've got
jurisdiction, go ahead and make a ruling. So --
MR. WHITE: Let me make the rest of my presentation --
MS. RAWSON: -- you know, it's going to be up to you. He says,
oh, yeah, you've got jurisdiction, I want you to have jurisdiction --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So we can make a ruling --
MS. RAWSON: Well, according to Mr. White--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- according to Mr. White--
MS. RAWSON: -- it's okay, you didn't lose any jurisdiction. I
don't know that.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Ifwe don't modify anything, then
Page 170
(
N~vem~r 29, 2007
we don't break the jurisdiction if it has gone to court, correct?
MS. RAWSON: Right. I don't know. I know that when you file
an appeal or a Writ of Cert, and I've seen the documents that you guys
don't have anymore jurisdiction.
He says you've got jurisdiction.
Michelle is saying okay, if you have jurisdiction, deny the
motion.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Jean, do we have in an alternative denial to
hear or denial to rule upon either one ofthese?
MS. RAWSON: You can deny the motion. You can table the
motion.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Table is what I'm thinking of.
MS. RAWSON : You can table the motion.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Which is not denying it.
MR. DEAN: Madam Chair, I'd like to make a motion. Motion for
modification of orders be denied.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear a second --
MR. LEFEBVRE: Denied or tabled?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: He said denied. Do I hear a
second?
MR. KELL Y: By doing that, we're accepting jurisdiction.
MR. DEAN: I agree.
MR. KELLY: Which I'm in favor of. But I'm just saying, I was
the only one who was in favor of accepting jurisdiction on that.
MS. ARNOLD: How are you accepting jurisdiction by acting on
a motion that was asked of you?
MR. KELL Y: If I'm not mistaken, by hearing the motion we're
accepting jurisdiction, where Mr. Wright is saying that we technically
don't have because an appeal was filed.
MS. ARNOLD: Like the Lovelace case, you took action on that
request, you denied it.
MR. WRIGHT: Based on a lack of jurisdiction.
Page 171
16 ,A ~vember 29,2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Exactly.
MR. KELLY: Oh, I'm sorry. Okay, thank you. I see what you're
saymg.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have a motion on the floor. Do I
have a second?
MR. MORGAN: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Opposed.
MR. PONTE: Opposed.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have two opposed?
MR. WHITE: May I comment. You've just cut off my ability to
present you with the evidence that I think could have led you to
conclude otherwise. And I fail to see how that's procedural due
process.
And that's what I'm actually just trying to get for my client is
procedural due process. I don't care how many bites of the apple. If the
apple is sour, my client has a right to keep coming back and asking.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I appreciate you staying here the
length of time you did and allowing the people to go in front of you.
MR. WHITE: Thank you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I feel that in this case we have
ruled the only way we could, other than to suspend it.
MR. WHITE: Certainly that would have been preferred. And I
don't know how you disposed of the motion and I don't recall there
being a second, so procedurally I guess it's --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: There was a second.
Page 172
16 I A "Z
N~mber 29, 2007
MR. WHITE: I'm talking about the motion to table, Madam
Chair.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: There wasn't a second.
MR. WHITE: I understand.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, the next case is Board of
County Commissioners versus -- oh, did he have a question?
MR. WHITE: Well, what I wanted to do was to proffer what I
would have otherwise told you as part of my motion.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I think we've made a decision and
I think that's ended it. I'm sorry.
MR. WHITE: Okay, then I hope to not bore you by telling you
about it in a different manner.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We have the request of
impositions of fines now, the Blockers.
MS. ARNOLD: Right. I guess you can -- I guess -- should I
proceed with those?
MR. KELLY: Michelle, are these all-- they're the same.
MS. ARNOLD: It's the same thing.
MR. KELLY: Can we lump them together or do you have to do
them individually?
MS. ARNOLD: I don't think so. I don't need to do them
individually, unless Jean, you--
MS. RAWSON: I'm going to --
MS. ARNOLD: -- I'll just say it all together.
MS. RAWSON: That's fine. I'm going to write three orders.
MS. ARNOLD: These were all heard on the same day. That was
heard April 27, 2006 and that was Cases No. 2006-16, 2006-17, and
2006-18, Board of County Commissioners versus Jerry and Kimberlea
Blocker.
The violations were of unlawful and unappropriate development
of residential use in an industrial zoned property.
A violation was found on all three cases, and the orders have
Page 173
161A 3
November 29,2007
been attached for your review.
Weare at this time asking that fines be imposed at a rate of $150
per day between the period of June 30th, 2007 through November
27th, 2007, 152 days, for a total of$22,800. Also -- and that was for
item number two, which indicated that if a rezoning action -- if
rezoning -- acting in due diligence to pursue the rezoning and
obtaining the same within 365 days from the pre-application meeting.
So that was not done.
Also, item number six indicated in the alternative by obtaining a
complete and sufficient Collier County demolition permit within 90
days or within 10 days after abandonment of the pursuit of the SDP
rezoning and SDP, whichever is applicable -- and from that there's an
additional $150 per day from the period of July 10th, 2007 through
November 29th, 142 days, for $21,300.
Additionally, there's operational costs of$354.16, for a total of
$44,454.16. And that applies to each case.
The numbers are -- yeah, the amounts are exactly the same for all
three cases.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: 44,000 --
MS. ARNOLD: 44,454.16.
MS. RAWSON: They all go through November the 29th?
MS. ARNOLD: Yes.
MS. RAWSON: So order number nine was -- what was the total?
MS. ARNOLD: The total for order number nine?
MS. RAWSON: Order item nine.
MS. ARNOLD: Okay, all right. Which is equivalent to two,
which is what I said, it's the $22,800. Because in the order we state
what they have to do and then the fine amounts --
MS. RAWSON: Gotcha.
MS. ARNOLD: -- are noted in another number.
So it's a total of 44,454.16 per case.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Jean, I have a question. Because
Page 174
-
16 I A ~ember29,2007
we state in here that if they get a rezoning upon approval of an SDP or
SIP. He's apparently trying to get permission to go after an SIP. So he
is actually trying to comply in one way of proceeding.
MS. RAWSON: Correct.
MS. ARNOLD: But your order says rezone and SDP/SIP,
whichever appropriate.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Right. My thing is he's trying to
get the SIP and get permission to get an SIP, so he's trying to comply
in one respect, correct?
MS. RAWSON: I think he is. And again, if you issue fines and
he complies, he can come back and ask you to abate them.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Right, so he has that --
MR. WHITE: Assuming that those fines and liens aren't
recorded. Because once they are, you lose jurisdiction and it goes to
the Board of County Commissioners.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Well, then they have the right to
waive fines too, I believe.
MS. RAWSON: Well, yes, that's true. Actually, he has the right
to come back and ask you to abate the fines, however, before you end
up turning it over to the county attorney for foreclosure. That's when
you lose jurisdiction.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So even if we impose the fines, if
they get through and they get the SIP or they get through this process,
they can come back and ask us to abate the fines, correct?
MS. RAWSON: We do it all the time. I know there's an Attorney
General's opinion that says you can't do that, but we do it all the time.
And it's not in the statute that you can't. The only time you have ever
lost jurisdiction is when you tell the county attorney to foreclose.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, thank you.
MR. WHITE: I'm just looking for some clarification, because I
had been told by another assistant county attorney, Mr. Klatzkow, that
as soon as those orders were recorded that jurisdiction of this board
Page 175
""1"
-A.. "~l~
Ndember 29,2007
161
was lost. And if I'm mistaken about that, and what's on the record
today is Ms. Rawson's opinion and this board's understanding that up
to the point in the time at which foreclosure is being ordered -- or
sought by this board that I have the opportunity to come back and
request abatement and/or mitigation of fines, then that's fine, and I
guess we could talk about that.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Jean, do you want to answer that
one?
MS. RAWSON: I'm going to ask Jeff for his opinion.
MR. WRIGHT: I agree with Jean, and the reason is, that
particular AG opinion, we like to say it's hard and fast but it's not
really settled law, and that opinion really says that it can only be
released, compromised or settled by the governing body, so nobody
else can get rid of it, but it doesn't say that it can't be amended in that
interim.
So it -- actually the special magistrate and -- the CEB special
magistrate tends to draw the line at the imposition and not amend
orders. But I have seen even her amend her lien orders. And I know,
as Jean says, that you guys have done it regularly. Obviously the clear
line in the sand is that 90-day period, once it's turned over for
foreclosure, but until then the law's not perfectly settled.
So I would defer to Jean and whatever advice you're getting from
her.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: In the past we have released
people.
MS. RAWSON: Yes--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: As long as they come up -- we've
abated --
MS. RAWSON: Even have a form they can fill out to come in
and ask for an abatement or a reduction of fines after they're in
compliance, notwithstanding the AG's opinion.
MR. WHITE: If I could just kind of try to vision how that would
Page 176
1'6 1 ~oJmber 29,2007
have to occur. We would have to be cited for a violation of
non-conforming under SIP.
MR. KELL Y: If you stick around for a few minutes, the next
item on our agenda is a request to forward to the county attorney's
office. At that point you could come and speak to those issues.
MR. WHITE: Understood. I have it clarified. Up until this
moment, my understanding was otherwise, but I'm accepting what's
being said and it makes sense to me.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I will say that is how we have
always practiced. Which is why I brought it out. I wanted to get that
clarified for you.
MS. ARNOLD: I believe there was a discussion with Mr. White
at -- with this board regarding no time period for requesting reduction
abatement of fine specified in your -- so, I mean, if you lose
jurisdiction once you imposed it, how do you not then have -- how do
you abate or reduce those fines if you lose jurisdiction after you've
imposed it?
I don't know if you recall that whole discussion that there was no
time period specified in our rules.
MR. WHITE: I'm not sure if Ms. Arnold is saying something
different than what our general understanding is. I hope not.
MS. ARNOLD: No.
MR. WHITE: We're all in agreement then. That's fine.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So we need to make a ruling as to
whether or not to impose these fines.
MR. WHITE: Madam Chair, I believe that I hopefully have an
opportunity to --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm going to let you speak now.
MR. WHITE: Thank you. My first objection is a procedural one,
and it goes to the rules and regulations of this board. And what I'm
suggesting to you is that -- and I don't know if the rules and
regulations that are out front on the table are the current rules or not?
Page 177
1616
3
November 29,2007
MR. KELLY: They're the current rules aside from two small
changes, and I believe those are highlighted or underlined. They're
underlined.
MR. WHITE: In the document that's out there?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes, that's what I understand.
MR. WHITE: Then I would direct your attention to what I have a
copy of that's Page 8, under Article 10, Roman numeral 10, entitled
Enforcement.
Is everybody with me?
MR. L'ESPERANCE: On Page 10?
MR. WHITE: No, no, sir, Page 8, Roman numeral 10.
MR. DEAN: What section?
MR. WHITE: I'm going to for the moment step over section one
and direct your attention to section two.
lt says the investigator shall file an affidavit of compliance or
noncompliance with the secretary to the board.
There are two affidavits of noncompliance in each of the three
cases that we're here discussing today. Can someone tell me when
those were filed? Because I note that they're dated respectively -- that
they were sworn on anyways, June 29th and July 11th. So I just have a
question as to when they were filed with the secretary.
Is -- Ms. Marku, are you under oath?
(The speaker was duly sworn.)
MS. MARKU: I would like to state that the affidavits of
noncompliance that were provided to me were provided the same date
that they were already signed by the investigator and notarized by the
investigator.
The investigator, Dennis Mazzone, in this case, in the three cases,
the date that he dated the affidavit and the date that he notarized the
affidavit, he provided me with the original copies.
MR. WHITE: So it's your testimony that they were considered
filed on those dates?
Page 178
rt, , A-- Niember 29, 2007
MS. MARKU: Yes, sir.
MR. WHITE: Would it be your duty, Ms. Marku, to send a copy
of those affidavits by regular mail as section two states?
MS. MARKU: Section two in the rules?
MR. WHITE: Yes, ma'am, section two, the second sentence
reads: Copy of said affidavit shall be sent to the violator by regular
U.S. Mail and recorded in the public records of Collier County,
Florida.
And then thirdly, the secretary to the board shall report the status
of the said affidavit at the next scheduled board meeting.
Was there a --
MR. L'ESPERANCE: I'm not reading those provisions in my
copy.
MR. PONTE: I didn't see that. Where are we?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I think you have a different copy
than we do.
MR. WHITE: I have what was out front.
I apologize, board members.
(Discussion was held off the record.)
MR. WHITE: Then can we go back on the record?
MS. ARNOLD: What he's reading from is the one that has
actually been approved by the board. The one that you have in your
packet, it hasn't been approved by the board, and so that's why--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: There were some changes on this
one, that's why we were all looking, going we can't find it, so --
MR. WHITE: Well, the one that I'm reading from --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's the one that is actually the
approved one. So we just went out and got some copies for everybody,
so -- are there any more out there?
Let's go back to Page 8.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Page 8, you said, section ten?
16' A 3
November 29,2007
MS. ARNOLD: Article ten.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: lt's article ten, section two. Now
we're all on the same page.
MR. WHITE: Thank you.
MR. WRIGHT: I would object to this line of questioning about
the issuance of the affidavit and the ordering of the affidavit. The
relevant information that you should be looking at is in section three. I
would just say section three, actually.
MR. WHITE: That's a request for a reduction or abatement of
fines.
MR. LEFEBVRE: These are rules we haven't voted on, correct?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Correct.
MR. LEFEBVRE: So then why are we looking at this?
MR. WHITE: The copy that I have --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The one that's out front is the
current copy that we have voted on. The one that's in our packet is the
one that we have not voted on.
MR. WHITE: I may get confused if this keeps up. I'm sorry for
that. Because I'm just trying to follow the rules. That's my job is to
help us all.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That was our misunderstanding
because we're all looking at the ones we haven't even voted on yet
tonight.
MR. WHITE: Then we're agreed as to what article ten, section
two says under the heading Enforcement.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Should be sent to the violator
regular U.S. Mail and recorded public records -- sorry.
lt says that a copy of said affidavit shall be sent to the violator by
regular U.S. Mail and recorded in the public records of Collier
County, Florida. The secretary to the board shall report the status of
the said affidavit at the next scheduled board meeting.
MR. WHITE: Thank you for putting it into the record.
Page 180
16 , ~r"2
Noven1ter 29,2007
And so I just return to my question, if! may. Ms. Marku, was
there a point in time at which you sent a copy of the affidavits of July
MR. WRIGHT: Objection. This is irrelevant to the question of
whether or not to reduce the amount of the lien.
MR. WHITE: The question is whether they should be imposed or
not. There is no lien.
MS. MARKU: There is no amount oftime where it states in the
rules that I have to provide you with -- that I have to provide the
respondent with a copy of the affidavit.
Also, this case has been going on in a continuance, have been put
on the agenda, I removed off the agenda, so -- and these affidavits has
been part of the exhibits.
MR. WHITE: They're part of the exhibits of to day's --
MS. MARKU: Today, and last hearing when it was continuance.
MS. ARNOLD: Patrick, the process has been--
MR. WHITE: Michelle, I think I can understand how to read the
rules, and I'm just trying to ask some questions about whether your
staff has followed the process, whether the county --
MS. ARNOLD: And I'm trying to answer--
MR. WHITE: -- can at this point lawfully impose fines.
MS. ARNOLD: I'm trying to answer your question, Patrick.
MR. WHITE: I did not ask a question of you, Michelle, I asked a
question of Ms. Marku.
MS. ARNOLD: And she replied to your question. Can I explain
the --
MR. WHITE: And I would like to ask her some more questions
about that answer, if! may, please.
May I inquire, Madam Chair?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Go.
MR. WHITE: Thank you.
So Ms. Marku, let me see if I understand. Is it your testimony
Page 181
~"
16 I ANoJnber 29, 2007
that you never sent a copy of the affidavit to the Blockers by regular
mail?
MS. MARKU: No, I have not.
MR. WHITE: Did you at any point in time record in the public
record of the county those affidavits?
MS. MARKU: No, I have not.
MR. WHITE: And was there a point in time at which you as the
secretary to the board reported the status of those affidavits from July
and June, at whatever would have been the next then scheduled board
meeting?
MS. MARKU: I have placed these copies of the affidavit on the
exhibits that the board members have received from last month's
agenda that they were -- you had a motion for continuance. lt was in
their packets, as well in these packets again.
And it does not state on the rules that it has to be a specific
amount of time where I would have to send these affidavits to the
respondents.
MR. WHITE: Well, that was my first question, which I thought
you previously answered that you had not.
The third question had to with whether you reported the status of
them at the next board meeting. That would be the board meeting
following June 29th and July 11th, which would have been the
meeting at the end of July, as far as I know.
And so my question is, did you report those affidavits at the end
of July, 20077
MS. MARKU: And then my answer again is that they were on
the packets of the board members.
MR. WHITE: For which month?
MS. MARKU: lt was for the last month.
MR. WHITE: For October?
MS. MARKU: Yes.
MR. WHITE: And for November.
Page 182
yo"'"'"
N1veJer 29,2007
MS. MARKU: Yes.
MR. WHITE: So it's fair to say they were not part of the packets
for July then?
MS. MARKU: I have to go back and see if you were -- if you
were on the agenda in July, then yes, they were.
MR. WHITE: lt's okay to say you don't know. I'm not trying to
make this torturous, believe me. I just need to get on the record that
there is a noncompliance with this board's own rules about providing
affidavits of noncompliance.
MS. ARNOLD: And I would have to object, because Patrick
White knows that he has requested continuances prior to coming to
this board so we were unable as staff to place this on the agenda for
your consideration the following month based on his continuances.
MR. WHITE: There are two separate issues of whether the
affidavits of noncompliance are reported --
MS. ARNOLD: And because he's not allowing me to tell him
what the procedures are, I can't explain to him why those affidavits
weren't put on there.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Michelle, I'm going to ask you to
go ahead and explain the procedures to me.
MS. ARNOLD: Well, the normal procedures are once -- and they
are normally placed on the agenda the next month after being filed
with the secretary and then recorded after the board's action has been
taken. But because this particular -- and we do imposition of fines
timely, because the affidavits are requested at the time your specific
actions are so noted in your order.
And in this particular case, you've got several different actions to
be taken. So the affidavits were filed, provided to the secretary to the
board. She attempted to place them on your agenda so that you would
have an update. Several requests were made for continuances, so I've
asked her not to place them on the agenda prior to your being asked
that yourself.
Page 183
16 , ~ lovember 29, 2007
So that was the reason at our last hearing that we asked that that
be the final request for continuance that was being granted for this
particular case, or these cases, because there's been numerous requests
that have been granted for this case, and that's the only reason why
you weren't able to consider them prior to today.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Jean?
MS. RAWSON: Yes.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Because apparently there has been
a difference on how we've handled this case because of the
continuances --
MS. RAWSON: Correct.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- we have apparently not given
the defendant -- his affidavit has not been mailed to him.
MS. RAWSON: lt usually goes out with the packet that you get
that they get.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So he would have received it last
month then.
MS. RAWSON: He should have.
MR. WHITE: No, he did not.
MS. RAWSON: lt's in your packet. They get the same packet
you do.
MS. ARNOLD: What I had indicated is that they would get it
after your consideration. But you've never considered it. So apparently
it was never mailed to them.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, so they haven't actually
received an affidavit then?
MS. MARKU: They have received an affidavit. Yesterday I -- if
I recall correctly, I had a public request from Mr. White's office to
have the packet of evidence, these exhibits, and she has received
those.
MR. WHITE: And the reason we asked is because we hadn't
received them, they hadn't been provided by mail.
Page 184
,'~ 'Z
- Novetf1ber 29, 2007
Now, we're talking about the third of those three things, and the
first of them. But the one that I think is most problematic for this
procedure is the fact that they were never recorded. And certainly I
would suggest that if your rules require something be done and it's not
done, that it's premature and inappropriate for you to consider
imposing fines today.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Jean?
MS. RAWSON : You know, I'm going to let Mr. Wright speak
here. I'm not sure that one has a whole lot to do with the other,
honestly.
You know, the liens and fines are going to continue to accrue
from the June date and from the July date, you know. If you impose
them today or if you impose them next month because now we gave
them a copy of the affidavit, I mean, they're just going to keep going.
MR. WHITE: Like I said, we skipped over section one.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I understand. Mr. Wright?
MR. WRIGHT: I just want to point out that compliance is no
longer at issue. Everybody knows, including Mr. White, that it's not in
compliance. So the fact --
MR. WHITE: I object to Mr. Wright putting words in my mouth.
I wish you would stop.
MR. WRIGHT: I apologize, maybe it is in compliance, in which
case we should be made aware of that. But we haven't been made
aware of that. So far, based on what I've heard and what I've seen, the
property is not in compliance, and I think that's consistent with your
order as well.
Now, whether or not there was a mailing of an affidavit, I trust
that Bendisa put together the appropriate packages and sent it to them.
Regardless of that, compliance is not at issue in this instant matter
which you're considering, which is whether or not to impose a lien.
There's already been a finding of noncompliance. There hasn't been a
finding of compliance.
Page 185
1'61
AoveJer 29,2007
So to get run off the path on this red herring is just going to take
up more of your time. And I would just suggest that you focus
specially whether or not to impose a lien and give him the courtesy of,
as he's requested, considering factors for mitigation of the fine.
MR. WHITE: Certainly the first of those would be whether the
county itself complied with its own rules. And I find it somewhat
astounding that a member of the Bar would suggest to you that you
don't have to follow your rules, that you should just rush to judgment
__ if! may be like you and put some words in your mouth -- and
impose fines without having any discussion about whether or not there
has been compliance, or efforts towards compliance, or what the
gravity of the violations may be.
There are a set of factors that are supposed to be evaluated. And
I'm prepared to put on evidence about those things for you in an effort
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I would like you to move forward
on that then and give us some of that information because I'm getting
tired of listening to everything but the information that should be
pertinent to whether or not we have a fine imposed.
MR. WHITE: I appreciate your frustration, Madam Chair,
believe me, I really do.
I would object that we are not procedurally in a proper position to
be able to consider the imposition of fines unless and until at the
minimum those affidavits are recorded in the public records.
Your rules require it, it's not been done. I don't know how you
can get to the point of going ahead with the process when it hasn't
been complied with under your own rules.
MS. ARNOLD: Can I say something? That these rules are
guidelines for you, and you all as the board being your rules have the
discretion whether or not to accept or require all those actions to be
taken. As Bendisa pointed out, there's no timeline specified ofthe
recording of the liens -- of the affidavits. So I mean, I'm not sure
Page 186
,.51
~ov~ber29,2007
where Mr. White is coming from that they have to first be recorded in
the public records before you all consider imposing those fines.
And if they're recorded, as Jeff Wright indicated, so what?
They're still in noncompliance. The fines still continue to accrue. You
all just need to make a determination whether or not you want to
impose today or we'll bring it back again in another month for you to
impose, because I don't think we're going to get anywhere closer to
compliance.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I want to find out why he thinks
he should -- besides the affidavit issue, because I don't think it falls
into play here, to be honest, because there is no time frame where it
says in our -- it says it needs to be filed, it doesn't say when.
I would like to move forward and listen to what he has to say in
regards to why we shouldn't impose the fines at this time. Because he
says he has arguments in that regard. If I don't hear that information,
then I'm going to stop this proceeding and I'm going to ask the board
to make a decision.
MR. WHITE: Thank you, Madam Chair, I'm happy to move
forward. But I'm noting my procedural concern for the record.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I understand.
MR. WHITE: Thank you. The first thing I'd ask you to do is kind
of go back to where we were before. The gravity of the violation here,
I think, has largely to do with the public health, safety, welfare
concerns that this board saw with respect to the adjacent property.
And the photographs that were provided to you and are part of
the record indicate clearly that there has been significant clean-up and
that largely all of those materials that were offensive and obnoxious
and were a nuisance accumulation have been removed from the
property line and are in the process of continuing to be cleaned up.
And I believe that as to the extent of any violation in terms of this
board feeling that there was a health, safety, welfare concern, that it
has been mitigated. And I would ask that the fine amounts certainly
Page 187
16 I ~ov~er 29,2007
should reflect that.
There are other concerns I have about the affidavit of
noncompliance. And Mr. Mazzone is here and if! may ask him a few
questions, please, about it?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Mazzone. You have to swear
him in, Cherie'.
(Speaker was duly sworn.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Before we start, we're having to
lose another member because he has to be elsewhere. So we'll say
good-bye to George. Merry Christmas, George.
MR. PONTE: Merry Christmas.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We might still be here.
(Mr. Ponte leaves the room.)
MR. WHITE: I was hoping for New Year's, actually.
MS. RAWSON: You're going to lose your attorney very shortly,
because I'm catching a plane. So, Mr. White --
MR. WHITE: Trust me, I had somewhere else I had to be at 3:00
as well.
MS. RAWSON: We're probably going to have to really --
because they can't do without me. So let's get this done.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Go ahead, Mr. White.
MR. WHITE: Thank you. Mr. Mazzone, you're the one that
prepared the June 29th and July 11 th affidavits, and do you have a
copy of one of those in front of you?
MR. MAZZONE: I do not.
MR. WHITE: Could someone provide him with a copy, please.
MR. MAZZONE: I have those now.
MR. WHITE: In paragraph number three of the June 29th
affidavit, you make the statement that -- in the second sentence that
the respondent has not complied with paragraph nine by not having
acted with due diligence in pursuit of a rezone of property in question
by June 29th.
Page 188
"
161A ~
Novefuber 29,2007
What actions did you take to determine that my clients had not
used due diligence?
MR. MAZZONE: I had spoken to a planner who was in charge
of that project and they had stated that there had been no progress
made, they have not heard back from you.
MR. WHITE: Did that individual also tell you, Mr. Mazzone,
that we weren't able to file for a rezoning because we did not have a
comprehensive plan amendment?
MR. MAZZONE: I don't believe they mentioned that.
MR. WHITE: But it is your understanding that one is required?
MR. MAZZONE: Correct.
MR. WHITE: So is it fair to say that no matter what degree of
diligence my clients would have used, there was no way they could
have obtained a rezoning by June 29th because they did not have a
comprehensive plan amendment?
I mean, is that a fair statement?
MR. MAZZONE: I think that's a statement. I believe that the
process of going through a rezone, in my heart of hearts, was one that
was just a delay tactic.
MR. WHITE: I understand. I've heard that from others before.
Thank you for your opinion.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. White, I've got a question. I
think all of this information that you're presenting would be really
good for an abatement of fines if it were imposed at a later time. I
would --
MR. WHITE: lt goes to the second factor ma'am, that says any
actions taken by the violator to correct the violation. My point is
simply this: There were no actions we could take to rezone the
property because we're legally precluded from doing so because we
did not have a comprehensive plan amendment. Nor did this board
afford us time to get one.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Which is what I'm stating is, I
Page 189
16' 1"-:1.,
nove~er 29, 2007
think it would be a better argument for an abatement.
Michelle?
MS. ARNOLD: As I noted earlier, Mr. White indicated that he
was told at that preap. meeting that he needed a compo plan
amendment in order to pursue a rezone. He could have at that time
come back to the board and asked for additional time. He could have
at that time submitted a compo plan amendment request and started
pursuing something towards the rezone, but neither of those avenues
were taken.
MR. WHITE: May I respond, Madam Chair, in kind?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes.
MR. WHITE: No one from code enforcement came to you either
when they recognized that there was a problem. Instead they rely upon
my client to come back here. And we did.
But we felt it was in our best interest to not come back to you all
until we had done what we could under the other factor that says what
can we do to abate the violation that you were concerned about as far
as the health, safety, welfare concern.
And it has taken our best efforts until the end of this month to get
those things in place. So I ask you, was that fair?
The second point that Michelle made was that we haven't filed for a
small-scale amendment.
Well, what we have done in the alternative, as my motion
indicated and I think as some of the testimony has been stated thus far,
is that my clients are actively involved in the Immokalee master plan
restudy process, and routinely attend the master plan visioning
committee meetings.
So I fail to understand why the county's failure to come forward
and look to correct an order which they recognize is a problem
because it doesn't give time to get a compo plan amendment suddenly
becomes my client's problem.
MS. ARNOLD: And I would object. I've never said that. I
Page 190
I 6-' ~ ~
Novemt1er 29,2007
believe your order was -- can I just speak to the comment about --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Actually, the board's getting a
little bit leery.
MS. ARNOLD: Can I just make one comment, speak to the
abatement of the health, safety? lt was Mr. White's testimony
previously, I believe, that he indicated that the site improvement plan
process would afford his clients to come into compliance and allow
them to replace some units that are currently on there.
I would argue that the reason some of those units needs to be
replaced is because they're not completely up to code.
MR. WHITE: There's no evidence of that, ma'am.
MS. ARNOLD: Well, I'm just kind of repeating what -- there
would be no reason for replacement --
MR. WHITE: No, I was simply indicating--
MS. ARNOLD: -- if these units were 100 percent health, safety
without health, safety concerns.
MR. WHITE: There's a large difference between them being
sufficient for human occupancy, and that was the other document I
was seeking to give you from HRS.
MR. DEAN: You're out of compliance.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm done. Right now it is out of
compliance. lt has not come into compliance. I will grant that the
respondent has done some due diligence in trying to bring it -- get it to
where he can bring it into a compliance in the manner that he wants.
I'm going to close it. I think I've heard enough. lt may not be to
your liking, but we need to move forward, because we're about ready
to lose our attorney and we won't be able to finish the rest of our cases
for the day.
MR. WHITE: Madam Chair, I'm prepared to come back at any
point in time when you have a quorum and an attorney.
MR. DEAN: Motion to close the public.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Second.
Page 191
........
1 ~,
. ~ov3ber 29, 2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: There's been a motion from the
board member to close the public hearing, and a second.
MR. WHITE: Just note for the record --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay.
MR. WHITE: I just note for the record there were at least two
other factors --
MR. DEAN: lt's closed--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I understood.
MR. WHITE: Mr. Dean, I believe I have the right to put on the
record for me to appeal --
MR. DEAN: Sir, we closed the meeting for the public. You've
talked for two and a half hours, sir.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. White, I understand that you
have two other points that you would have liked to have brought up,
and I will put it on the record for you. And that should close it.
MR. WHITE: lt does.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm looking for whether or not to
impose the fines.
MR. LEFEBVRE: I make a motion to impose the fines.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear a second?
MR. MORGAN: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
Page 192
'.'''' ill
16 IIJ No1mber 29,2007
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
At this time we're imposing the fines. However, as I stated, you
have the right to come back and ask for abatement once you come into
compliance, however long that takes.
MR. WHITE: As long as it doesn't take more than three months.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And at that time frame, your
arguments would weight heavy. I will tell you that. Okay?
MR. WHITE: I appreciate knowing that, and I would just want to
say for the record that as far as the imposition of fines and the dollar
amounts, I believe that they are in excess of what is necessary to get
us to compliance.
Weare doing things and have demonstrated to you that we have
done things --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Come back at the time you come
into compliance and use that argument, sir. I'm not saying you have to
pay it at this time, I'm saying come into compliance and come back to
us and we will look at abating some of them.
MR. WHITE: You understand that that's at least three years
away.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That may be. Thank you.
MR. WHITE: Thank you.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The next case is Board of County
Commissioners versus Alfredo and Miradis Miralles.
MS. ARNOLD: This case was actually on your agenda last
month, and Mr. Miralles came, and there was question about whether
or not it was clear that he needed to paint over the shadowing, I
believe, of the sign. And you gave him additional time before abating
-- imposing the fines.
Page 193
......1.
16 , ~ N3ember 29, 2007
The violation has been abated. He did it the next day . We went
and verified that. So it's up to you all whether or not you want to
impose the fines that were accrued at that point. That was from
September 7th, 2007 through October 29th, 2007 for a total of 52 days
at a rate of$IOO per day, $5,200.
There is an additional $335.67 for operational costs. None of any
of the fines or operational costs have been paid.
I don't know if you recall at your last hearing as well, there were
several other items I believe on --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I don't recall because I wasn't
here. But does Mr. Snow have an opinion on this particular case?
(Speaker was duly sworn.)
MR. SNOW: Investigator Kitchell Snow for the record.
No ma'am, we have -- if the board would decide leniency on this
matter. lt was just a small matter of painting the shadowing, and we
would have no objection to any reduction of fines.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: He found that out and then he
took care of it the next day.
MR. SNOW: He took care of it the next day. And they were
doing a lot of work up there on it. You weren't here, Madam Chair, but
they were working on another property. They did everything else but
just the shadowing, and he did it the next Monday, right after when the
board ordered. So we would have no objection to any reduction.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'll close the public hearing then.
Wait, Michelle had one more thing to say. Okay.
MS. ARNOLD: I just wanted to note that there is one other case
that you all did consider with Mr. Miralles. He did have operational
costs for that, and those haven't been paid either. So maybe some time
period could be placed on --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: When he has to pay --
MS. ARNOLD: When he has to pay whatever he has to pay.
And if you are reducing it, if it's not paid timely, then maybe some
Page 194
1,-'.
&J ti' ("
:! ;1
~ 3
November 29, 2007
consideration should be given to bumping it back up to what the
original amount was.
MR. KELLY: I'll make a motion that we impose operational
costs of$335.67 to be paid within 30 days.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: If it's not paid within 30 days?
MR. KELL Y: Can we do anything with operational costs as far
as --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: No. We can go back to adding
some of the fine back, though. Michelle had asked that if they didn't
pay what he asked them to pay, operational costs, that we then go
back to incurring some of the fine.
So I was just telling him that that's what he ought to consider.
MR. KELLY: In my motion, we would impose operational costs
of$335.67 to be paid within 30 days or a civil penalty of$I,500
would be imposed.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Second the motion.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Does that work?
MS. ARNOLD: So essentially you're abating the fine, and if not
__ if the operational cost is not paid within 30 days, the fine of$I,500
would be imposed, correct?
MR. KELLY: Yes, ma'am. And the reason why I said that, it's
not a number I pulled out of the air. In the stipulated agreement, there
was, because it was a repeated violation, a $1,500 civil penalty. I think
Page 195
16/ J1 .3
November 29,2007
that's part of the same --
MS. ARNOLD: No.
MR. KELLY: I have a copy of their stipulated agreement.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That was in the original.
MS. ARNOLD: That's what I was going to say. We've had other
cases with Mr. Miralles, and I don't believe it's the same case that you
MR. KELLY: Okay, so this wasn't supposed to be in our packet
then?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Anyway.
MR. KELLY: Well, anyways, that's--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's why he pulled it out.
MR. KELLY: That's why I picked that number.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: lt's still a good number.
MS. ARNOLD: That wasn't supposed to be there. I caught that
too.
MR. MORGAN: I caught one too.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's okay, it was a good number
and we went with it, so continue.
Okay, I believe next is a request to forward to the county
attorney's office. BCC verse EJ. Properties LLC. Leonardo D. Starke,
Esquire.
MR. DEAN: I make a motion we move this to foreclosure.
MR. KELL Y: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And then there was a second.
All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Page 196
l",A ~
~ovember1'9, 2007
Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The next one being Board of
County Commissioners versus Patrice E. Savignano.
MR. KELLY: They went together.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: They went together?
Oh, he sent them together, I'm sorry.
MS. ARNOLD: There's a memo, that was what I was searching
for, that you all should have received, that just lists the properties that
have passed the three-month time period that need to be forwarded for
action before the --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We're sending them both to the--
MS. ARNOLD: County attorney.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, new business. Code
Enforcement Board rules and regs. And I had one little item on the
new ones.
MR. LEFEBVRE: I don't know where I got that in my packet.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: lt was in your packet.
MR. LEFEBVRE: I got mine yesterday. So I'm not sure where it
should be or where it was.
MR. DEAN: What's the number you're looking for?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: lt was on Page 2, article five,
section two. I just need to scratch out a couple of words, if everybody
agrees, because we're planning on not having a meeting in December.
And according to our rules, and we want to make sure we're
going to comply with our rules, the regular meetings, regular meetings
of the Code Enforcement Board shall be held at least monthly. And
seeing that we're skipping a month, we need to strike out that at least
monthly and just say on the fourth Thursday and/or at times and
places as needed determined by the board in the Board of County
Commissioners chambers. And leave it alone.
Ifthat's okay with everybody?
Page 197
l~,A ~
}:(ovember 19, 2007
MR. DEAN: He says if you miss two out of three consecutive--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: No, no, no, no. We're on page --
MR. DEAN: You said Page 2.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Section two, held at least
monthly.
MR. DEAN: Okay.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Madam Chair, I would concur with your
recommendation.
MR. LEFEBVRE: lt says place -- okay.
MR. DEAN: I thought the answer came with 4-B. lt says
succeSSIve.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm just wanting to make sure that
we have the right to skip a meeting if we need to for holidays or
whatever, no ability to have one because we have no room to have
one, whatever the case may be.
MR. DEAN: At least monthly except for holidays.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Let's go to the next -- the comma after
Thursday, and/or at other times and places needed and determined by
the board in the Collier County commission chambers. That's
contradictory. lt's saying that you can only have it in--
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: At the chambers.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Right. But in the sentence before, in that same
sentence it says and/or at other places and times.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: That's not exclusionary, it's inclusive.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: lt's and/or.
All right, move on. Michelle, you had this brought up to us
because of a few changes?
MS. ARNOLD: Yes. We have highlighted in article six of your
agenda just some minor things to reflect really what you're doing
currently on your agenda.
Order of business. And that would be to insert A, motions for
imposition of fines under old business. Motion for
Page 198
..
~~vlm~r 2~2007
reduction/abatement of fines, and to include in there also under item
seven, a consent agenda item, clarifying that those would be motions
for imposition of fines where the respondent is not present.
That was something that you all -- you weren't here -- requested
to be considered, you know, since some ofthese things are so routine.
Once you approve the agenda the consent agenda items are also being
approved.
If the respondents are here for those motions for imposition of
fines, obviously we would have it under old business and they would
be afforded the opportunity to speak.
Same thing for -- well, for the items requesting county attorney's
action.
So those would be -- and the other reason for bringing this back
is number seven. We actually attempted to put this on the Board of
County Commissioners' agenda, and it's been pulled because there was
some language that currently is in your rules that the county manager
felt is in conflict with his ordinance.
So the suggestion is to modify paragraph P, which is on Page 7,
to reflect actually what the statute says is that the board shall notify
the local governing body, which may make all reasonable repairs
required to bring the property into compliance. And this would apply
to when you're giving us authorization to demolish something or to
clean up the litter or to tow, whatever.
So instead of you giving us direction, you're really saying okay,
we're notifying you, you can go ahead and do this if you find fit. And
we've coordinated something with the county manager's office that he
would look at those things.
Is that the only thing? Did you have anything, Jeff?
MR. WRIGHT: Nothing.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do we need to make a vote on
this then?
MR. KELLY: Yeah. I make a motion we accept the changes.
Page 199
16' A"
November 29, ~07
MR. LEFEBVRE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
MR. KELL Y: Under new business, can I add one thing in real
quick? Since Gerald had to resign in order to seek public office and he
was our vice chair, I don't think that it's fair that I stay as vice chair. I
was wondering if it would be okay to step down and to allow Gerald
the opportunity to continue out the rest of his term as we originally
voted. If that's the will of the board.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is there any objection or
comments?
MR. DEAN: Gerald, do you still want to be the vice chair, sir?
MR. LEFEBVRE: Sure, yes.
MR. DEAN: And you want to do that, sir?
MR. KELLY: Yes.
MR. DEAN: I'll make the motion that Gerald Lefebvre become
the vice chair and Mr. Kelly is stepping down.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Need a second.
MR. L'ESPERANCE: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
Page 200
1~" 3
November 29, 2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye.
Any supposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay.
MS. ARNOLD: Can I just add one other comment? Oftentimes
the respondent, although they're supposed to give their packets to us in
advance, they don't do that, and we just kind of as a routine accept it
and the county's not ever seen it. I just request that the board afford us
the opportunity to review it before, just as we do for them.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I tried to do that today when I was
cognizant of the fact you didn't get them.
Okay, do we have any other?
MR. DEAN: Affirmative defense.
MR. WRIGHT: I'll try to limit this to a minute or so. Jeff Wright
for the county attorney's office.
There's a new consolidated Code Enforcement ordinance, as you
probably are all aware of. lt's Ordinance No. 2007-44. And that
ordinance is 14 pages long.
On the 14th page, under article six, is Affirmative Defense. And
that affirmative defense provision provides basically that you go to the
building official, and I will read directly from that paragraph.
lt shall be a complete defense to a code enforcement action, and
I'm paraphrasing here, if you are able to demonstrate to the building
official as defined by the Florida Building Code, by a preponderance
of the evidence.
So basically, anybody that wants to use this particular defense
has to go to the building official, who has his own scale and is trying
to weigh by a preponderance of the evidence. So we've run into some
questions on how does the average person coming through the door at
CDES invoke this affirmative defense.
And I wanted to give you all this information and also the public
the information. There is a person in the lobby right now, Carol
Page 201
JO~!b~ 29'-~07
Stachura, probably not much longer, but Carol Stachura, who is
answering questions directly related to this affirmative defense.
And also, the building department is putting together a formal policy
that they'll publish and have up front for people to look at so they'll
know exactly what they need to do to invoke this defense.
And I would ask if anybody has any questions. We want to kind
of promote this to people so they don't realize it halfway through their
case that they had this option. So we want to make it known that
people have this available to them.
So if you have any questions, call our office, the county
attorney's office. Our number is 774-8400. Or you can call the
permitting hotline. I don't have the number here, but the contact
person is Carol Stachura, S-T-A-C-H-U-R-A.
And I apologize if! went over time, but that's all I have.
MS. ARNOLD: I just have one other announcement. The special
magistrate is going to be conducting a public forum on January 30th?
MS. MARKU: 31st.
MS. ARNOLD: 31st. And it's for the public. She would love it if
you all would attend as well. And it's -- trying to make announcements
in as many places as possible so that we have pretty good attendance.
And the idea behind it is just to give the public some understanding of
that process, which is very similar to this process. And we're going to
try to have like some mock hearings so that the public, if they choose
to participate, they can kind of understand by being placed in certain
__ you know, a situation of a respondent or a situation ofthe
investigator to try to get an idea of what the process is all about and
what's expected of people that are attending that process.
So it's January 31st, and it's going to be in the Board of County
Commissioners' chambers.
MR. DEAN: Sounds like fun. Maybe we'll go into the New Year
MS. ARNOLD: I know, it does sound like fun.
Page 202
16 L~: ~
Noveni~er ~ 2007
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Time frame?
MS. ARNOLD: 9:00? Or is it 8:30?
MS. MARKU: 9:00.
MS. ARNOLD: 9:00.
MR. LEFEBVRE: The other thing is, maybe we can all pull our
packages out for Emma Houston since we're probably going to re-see
this next --
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: There's a couple of them, actually.
I didn't do that, that's in the pile.
MR. LEFEBVRE: But maybe just to save --
MS. ARNOLD: Thank you so much for doing that.
MR. LEFEBVRE: -- some time and money.
MR. DEAN: You said January 31st?
MR. LEFEBVRE: Which was the other case?
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The Skyles.
MR. LEFEBVRE: What was it, Styles?
MS. RAWSON: Van Slykes.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And with that, do we--
MR. DEAN: I make a motion to adjourn.
MR. KELL Y: Second.
CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. All those in favor?
MR. MORGAN: Aye.
MR. DEAN: Aye.
MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye.
MR. LESPERANCE: Aye.
MR. KELLY: Aye.
1~1 A "Z
November 29,2007
*****
There being no further business for the good of the County, the
meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 4:30 p.m.
COLLIER COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
1L- 13~
SHERI BARNETT, Chairman
These minutes approved by the Board on ~ ~ 't) :2 0 07
as presented ~ or as corrected
TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY
COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC. BY CHERIE'
NOTTINGHAM
Page 204
':iaI8 ___\I~..I:'-...L_
Ha!as -- ;fi#-----
Hennlng._~.. __.~
;oyle_. ~___
~()!ettfl . ..._m'" ____.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 AM., THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 2008, IN THE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BillLDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT
CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA:
16/ ,if
"
;,"~
'.:~
'.?r
AGENDA
NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY
ITEM, INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION
OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK
ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN, PERSONS WISHING TO
HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA
PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO
THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING, IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS
INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE
APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE
PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC
WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE A V AILABLE
FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF
APPLICABLE,
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED
A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE
MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS
MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON
WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
L PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY
3, ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA
4, PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES
5, APPROVAL OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, LDC MEETING; DECEMBER 13, LDC MEETING; DECEMBER 20,
REGULAR MEETING;
6. BCC REPORT- RECAPS - Not Available at this time
7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
8, CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
A, Petition: CU-2007-AR-12384, Enterprise Leasing Company d/b/a Enterprise Rent-a-Car, applicant and
owner, is requesting a Conditional Use pursuant to LDC Section 2,04.03 for a rental car agency within the C-4
zoning district The subject property is located 13560 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 8, Section 15, Township 48
South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, (Coordinator: Willie Brown)
9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Petition: PUDZ-2006-AR-lOI71, Eastbourne Bonita, LLC, represented by Laura Spurgeon, of Jolmson
Engineering, Inc., and Patrick G, White, Atty. of Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, LLP., requesting a rezone
from the Agricultural (A) and Special Treatment (ST) Overlay Zoning District to the Residential Planned Unit
Development (RPUD) Zoning District for project known as Brandon RPUD, for the development of 204 single-
family and multi-family residential units, The subject property, consisting of 5 LI acres,..~ located on the
southeast corner of the intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memoria~~~, Section 13,
Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Melissa Zone)CONTINJJ~.p
FROM 1117/08 Date II { III ~
1
Item#:
/
'G~'2S to
16 I ~j'''~A 4
B. Petition: CU-2007-AR- 11394, The Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter Day Saints, represented by Matthew Vasilevski of Wedding, Stephenson, and Ibarguen, Architects, Inc"
is proposing a Conditional Use of the Commercial Professional and General Office (C-I) Zoning District with a
SR29 Commercial Subdistrict Overlay (C-I-SR29-COSD) and the RSF-3 (Residential Single-Family) Zoning
District for ChurchIPlace of Worship, allowed pursuant to LDC Section 2,04,03, Table 2. The 16.8-acre site is
located at 635 State Road 29, in Section 32, To,,",ship 46 South, Range 29 East, Immokalee, Collier County,
Florida, (Coordinator: John-David Moss)
C Petition: PUDZ-2007-AR-12248, Sabal Palm Development, LLC, represented by Robert L. Duane, AICP, of
Hole Montes, Inc, and Richard D, Yovanovich ofGoodlette, Coleman, and Johnson, requesting a rezone from the
Agricultural (A) to the Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Zoning District for project to be leno,,",
as Napoli Village. The +/-8.97- acre site is proposed to pennit an adult congregate living facility, comprising
two four-stOl)' buildings. The subject site is located east of Tamiami Trail North (US 41), west of Sterling
Oaks PUD, and north of the Community Congregational Church, at 15450 Tamiami Trail North, in
Section 9, To,,",ship 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: John-David Moss)
10, OLD BUSINESS
I L NEW BUSINESS
A The CCPC requests to have a progress report be given to them concerning the EAR based LDC amendments
pertaining to Policy 6.2.5 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element
I I. PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM
12, DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA
13, ADJOURN
2/7 108CCPC Agenda/RB/sp/mm
2
RECEIVED 16 I A ! 4'
FEB 0 6 2008 November 28, 2007
hOdr(i of COUilty Commissionejs
TRANSCRIPT OF THE LDC MEETING OF THE
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COM~ISS~~w If"
Naples Florida Fiala - .~
, Halas ~-
November 28, 2007 ~enl1ing1f~ (~
voyle - - -<Z'.--.
Coletta ----
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning
Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted
business herein, met on this date at 8:30 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION
in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida,
with the following members present:
CHAIRMAN:
Mark Strain
Lindy Adelstein
Donna Reed-Caron
Tor Kolflat
Paul Midney
Bob Murray
Brad Schiffer
Robert Vigliotti
ALSO PRESENT:
Jeffrey Klatzkow, Chief Asst. County Attorney
Catherine Fabacher, LDC Manager
Joseph Schmitt, CDES Administrator Misc.Cooes: Iv I A tf
Date:
Item':
Page 1
Copies to:
/
J
1 6" A" J.:
November~, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Microphones are on, everybody.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Let's rise.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Just a minute. No, no, no, no, no.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: We felt like getting up, it's okay.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good morning. And welcome to the
Collier County Planning Commission meeting, November 28th, the
2007 Cycle 2 land development code hearings.
Hopefully we'll start today and hopefully be done before today's
over, but maybe not, depending on the timing.
So if you'll all please rise for the pledge of allegiance.
(Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. And will the secretary please
do the roll call.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Kolflat.
COMMISSIONER KOLFLAT: Here.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Schiffer.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'm here.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Midney.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Here.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Ms. Caron is here.
Mr. Strain.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Here.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Adelstein.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Here.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Murray.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Here.
COMMISSIONER CARON: And Mr. Vigliotti.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Here.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Addenda to the agenda. And we're
basically going to take the book in order. Originally we take in order
of when staffs here to present their particular issues. Although I notice
Page 2
" ~ I,
r '-" ttJ
16& ;-,.~.,.
November 28, 2007
that there are members of the public here. And our first goal has
always been to try to accommodate the public.
So we will defer to the public sections, provided staff are here as
well. Ifthey're not, we'll have to ask staff to come over, so while the
public's here, we can finish that up today, while members ofthe public
are here to speak.
And maybe, Cormac, and Ellie, if the two of you could just come
to the microphone for a minute and tell us what sections you're here
for, and we'll try to make sure staffs here and we can put those first on
the agenda today.
MR. GIBLIN: For the record, Cormac Giblin. I'm here for the -- I
believe it's the second amendment in your packet. It's on Page 3. lt is
LDC Sections 1.08.02 and 2.06.03, the affordable housing density
rating system.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Catherine, do you have people here this
morning to speak on those?
MS. F ABACHER: Right here.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, good. We can go forward with
those. Okay.
MS. KRIER: Good morning. For the record, Ellie Krier. I'm
speaking on LDC 5: 103-104, the open house signs for real estate.
That's the page number that's showing here. Let's see, 5.06.02,
permitted signs.
MS. FABACHER: On Page 43 of the packet.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's what I was looking for.
MS. KRIER: That I did not know, I apologize.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, no problem.
Catherine, do we have staff here who can address that --
MS. F ABACHER: I was hoping Joe was going to show up, but I
can address it.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, there he is.
MS. FABACHER: Well, all right.
Page 3
'<0:-""':
..
161A 4
November 28, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, good. Then the first two items on
the agenda will be those two in the order just presented to us, if that's
-- okay.
Now, before we get into the agenda, we have a series of other
things to talk about.
First of all, our next regular meeting is next Thursday. Our
packets are being distributed today. Those of you -- can everybody
make it to that meeting? Anybody know if they cannot.
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Looks like we'll have a quorum.
The next meeting after that is on the 13th of the month. lt was a
special meeting that we scheduled for the Bert Harris claim involving
the Cocohatchee project. That still is to go on. Yesterday the BCC
talked about it. The outcome of their discussion virtually changes
nothing for us. They may call it something different, but we're still
going to be doing basically the same thing we were asked to do
originally.
And I believe Mr. Schmitt has got a tape that he wants us to see
in regards to the actions taken on this matter yesterday so we can see
verbatim what the BCC is looking for.
Catherine?
MS. F ABACHER: I wanted to remind you, Mr. Chair, that we
have a meeting 5:05 on December 12th, which is our second LDC
meeting.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you for that. How about that for
everybody, on December 12th, does anybody know -- that's in the
evening 5:00. Is everybody okay with that?
COMMISSIONER KOLFLA T: I will not be there.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Tor, if someone were to pick you up and
then drop you back off, would you be able to make it?
COMMISSIONER KOLFLA T: Depends who it is.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I know Brad -- I could or Brad
Page 4
1 6" ,lI'
~vember 28, 2067
could. Would that work for you?
COMMISSIONER KOLFLA T: Fine.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, good.
Lindy, are you okay with the 5:05 meeting?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Yes.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Then we will certainly have that on
schedule.
And by the way, before we go too far, during the break, which
will be at around 10:00, could you have someone from facilities
management contacted by that time so that after the break we can
know how long we can have this room for.
There's been a variety of times, and I understand the room's
needed by the legislative delegation at 2:00. I don't understand why
they want us out of here at 11 :30 when they're going to take a lunch
hour anyway. Why don't we just stay here as long as we can and let
them get in here when they need to get in here.
MR. SCHMITT: Mr. Chairman, I believe they have to set up the
tables down here. They're going to -- the facilities probably have to
get in here at least by noon.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: They don't eat lunch?
I mean, if they --
MR. SCHMITT: We'll find out when facilities -- but they have to
bring the chairs in and set up for the 2:00 meeting. So I'll find out how
long you can stay. I thought we could be in here at least until 1 :00.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I thought so, too. And I've heard
different times now. And I'm kind of trying to understand why the
times are changing the way they are.
MR. SCHMITT: We'll check.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And if we seem to be running out
of time, I need to finish this cycle in the month of December. So I
don't know what it takes to move other people out of this room.
I think the only other people that shouldn't be moved is the BCC,
Page 5
lo.'t-A" "'4
November 28, 2007
because we can't do that. But other than that, I don't know why we
can't have more availability on the times we need to meet to get our
work accomplished.
So the goal is to get this done in December, and whether we have
to meet nights, mornings or part afternoons, I don't know why we can't
do that, Joe, if --
MR. SCHMITT: We have four meetings scheduled. Of course
the one now will be consumed with the --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Cocohatchee.
MR. SCHMITT: Cocohatchee.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. But we also have our regular
meetings that we can add onto if we need to if they're short enough.
Okay, I believe you were going to show us what occurred yesterday.
MR. SCHMITT: I still haven't got it -- this thing will not play it
so -- I need to find out why it won't play it.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'll tell you what, we can go into a
couple of the issues, and then when you get it resolved we'll stop at the
end of whatever one we're into and break for this for a minute.
Catherine, let's move forward with the first one that Cormac is
here for --
MS. F ABACHER: The first one we'll talk about is the affordable
housing density bonus rating system. This is a private petition by
Wi IsonMiller.
Cormac Giblin is here to represent it. lt's on Page 3 of your
booklet, Page A of your summary sheets.
MR. GIBLIN: Good morning, Commissioners. Cormac Giblin,
project manager with Wilson Miller, for the record.
I'm here to represent a private petition that is asking basically for
three text changes to the LDC, two of them having to do with
definitions only . You'll find it on Page 3 of your packet.
The county last year adopted an official definition of essential
personnel housing, or ESP housing, and that was in response to
Page 6
i6 I A b.,
November 28, 2007
Representative Davis's and the legislature and Governor's passage of
the CWHIPP housing program. That program required that the county
adopt and pass a definition, a local definition of essential personnel
housing.
The county did that last year, and it is in its official form. And it
currently lives in the local housing assistance plan.
(Sound interruption.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is that the BCC meeting? Someone gave
you a bogus CD, Joe.
MR. SCHMITT: That was not me, that was on cable.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm sorry, Cormac.
MR. GIBLIN: That's all right. Some days.
The -- so the county has already adopted and incorporated this
very definition of essential personnel housing into the local housing
assistance plan.
What the first part of this amendment does is it brings that same
exact definition into the LDC as well, which is where most of the
county's legal definitions and land use areas lie.
The second part of this definition -- or the second part of this
change, on Page 4 in the middle of the page, adds essential personnel
housing or essential personnel employer-owned housing to the official
definition of affordable workforce housing. Again, kind of just
continuing to bring this into the mix of the county's official affordable
housing programs.
And then the last change can be found on Page 6, a short
underlined right underneath the chart, that says that essential service
personnel employer-owned housing can also take advantage of the
density bonus system at the gap workforce low and very low levels as
well.
This amendment was brought in response to a desire of major
employers in the community wishing to build more affordable
workforce housing for their employees. And after looking at the
Page 7
i~ ,4
November 28, 2007
~..,
current system, we realized that this change was needed to allow that
to happen.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any questions?
Mr. Murray?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Good morning, Cormac. I have a
couple of things on Page 3, just as a little housekeeping thing, under
reason, the third line, the word proving. Is that intended to be
approving or providing? It doesn't seem to work with proving.
MR. GIBLIN: The --
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: See the third line of that, under
reason.
MR. GIBLIN: lt should be providing, providing.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay. You'll want to change that.
More importantly, though, I think we may have an issue with, on
Pages 4 and 6 where it references employer-owned housing.
Part of the coalition -- you have fire departments, they're precluded
from owning homes or owning homes for their people, as far as I
know under the law. And there are others that would be restricted.
Would we not be excluding those organizations that are part of that
CWHIPP program and the people we're intending to support in this
case by this definition?
MR. GIBLIN: I don't --I know that -- I'm not entirely sure about
the fire department. I know that the Sheriffs Department is precluded
from owning housing.
But other members of the coalition, both hospitals in town, the
county government, the city government, basically any employer --
and just to -- you do not need to be a member of this coalition that's
come together to qualify for this change. It would be any employer
that meets this definition, which essentially includes anyone
employing someone who earns less than 80 percent of medium
Income.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yes, but that's not my question.
Page 8
16/ A'4
November 28, 2007
My question is really focused -- I hope is focused effectively for you
on the premise of employer-owned. And if there is an issue, even if it
pertains to only one group, one organization, such as the sheriff, you
may actually be causing a problem unintentionally by using that
definition employer-owned.
Now, I recognize that some of the CWHIPP, if not all of the
CWHIPP intent, and I'm putting that under CWHIPP, there may be
others, that they're talking cooperative. And in that context maybe an
umbrella group alone. But I'm not trying to get into that.
What I'm trying to avoid is the possibility that we'll exclude
somebody.
I just wonder if you give consideration to that.
MR. GIBLIN: If certain organizations' charter or mission
precludes them from being able to own housing for their employees,
there's not really much that the LDC can do to change that.
This is just trying to give that opportunity to those that can avail
themselves of it.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: But we'll actually be going
against the very intent of what we're trying to do for people then by
limiting it right there.
MR. GIBLIN: I'm sorry, I'm not quite following.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Well, here, if the intent is to
provide, for instance, sheriffs deputies with housing and the sheriff is
precluded from having ownership of homes, that entire group will no
longer fall into the category here, will it?
MR. GIBLIN: I don't see how if they're precluded today how this
change negatively impacts them.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And maybe, Mr. Murray, what the
clarity needs is that they currently apply under -- if they want to be
under the workforce housing category, it's still there and still benefits
those categories.
This just opens it up to an additional category of
Page 9
"lJ 6 I ,~ I
.fl. ;1, " l.g. 3
November 28, 2007
employer-owned. They don't have to be employer-owned to be
benefiting from the workforce bonuses, it could still be done --
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I appreciate that. And I
understand. Thank you for the clarification and your premise there.
However, I am aware that they are a member of a group that is
intending to acquire and have housing for those people. So I think --
whether -- I think it needs to be addressed, certainly, okay.
I see something that others may not see, so I'm not sure I can
make it any clearer. If you don't agree -- I don't know ifMr. Klatzkow
can help in this. I think he's familiar.
MR. KLA TZKOW: I've got different issues. I don't really have
an issue with what you are raising.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Klatzkow, if you have other issues,
what are yours, then?
MR. KLA TZKOW: I've got two minor issues. It refers to
median. If you go to Page 3, one, two, three, four, five lines down, it
says 140 percent of median, it should read median income.
The same with the prior line, 120 percent of median income,
rather than just median.
But my question is -- my real question is, I read the last clause as
may be amended from time to time the Collier County Housing
Assistance Plan. And Cormac, what I don't understand is are you
saying that this LDC definition is going to change depending upon
changes to the definition in the Housing Assistance Plan?
MR. GIBLIN: What the county's got now is that the state
legislature requires that the official definition live in the Housing
Assistance Plan, and any updates to it must be made there and then
subsequently made here.
MR. KLA TZKOW: Why don't we just say then that essential
service personnel, and just have the definition, you know, see
definition in the Collier County Housing Assistance Plan.
Page 10
16/A 4
November 28, 2007
Otherwise, we're going to have to amend this LDC every time we
amend the Collier County Housing Assistance Plan.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does that work for you?
MR. GIBLIN: That does.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let's do that then. Anybody object to it?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: No, I have a question.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Klatzkow, were you finished?
MR. KLATZKOW: Yes.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray, I'm sorry, when we went to
Mr. Klatzkow I didn't ask you, are you finished?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I guess I am, because I'm not
able to make my point. And I apologize for my inability to do so, but
there is a point I was attempting to make, and I am concerned, I don't
want to go through a whole process of trying to presume to educate
everybody here in that. I don't have the ability to do that. I just feel
that there is a danger here, that's all.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Cormac, I've got a question in
the definitions. Skilled building trades personnel. Is that everyone?
Every construction employee can say that they're skilled in a certain
manner. So you're saying any construction employee?
MR. GIBLIN: That's the way I would interpret the definition.
The wording of this definition was actually created by the state
legislature and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners last
year. And that is the way I would interpret it. Construction industry
employees.
The goal -- one of the dangers of a definition like this, and I've
had some conversations in the past about it, is it does tend to create
discrimination or special categories. And I think what we've done here
or what the state legislature have done and what we've done
additionally to this definition is to try to make it as all-inclusive as
possible so as to not try to create anyone special category of
Page 11
]7 it, .:
---.L 't./
't
November 28, 2007
employee.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Okay.
MR. GIBLIN: And I think especially the last line in the definition
that says and anybody else who happens to be low income in Collier
County also qualifies as this.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah, I guess that's where I wanted
to go. This is supposed to be a definition of essential service
personnel. But there's nobody who's excluded here. Everybody is
essential service.
MR. GIBLIN: If you're low income, yes.
COMMISSIONER CARON: If you're low income, you're
essential.
MR. GIBLIN: Correct, according to this definition.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: That doesn't make sense.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay.
MR. GIBLIN: And again, this is the existing definition already
adopted by the county and approved by the state. So all we were asked
to do by staff was to bring this into the LDC for clarification.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Additionally, let's go down on Page
4 where you have your definition of employer-owned housing up to
140 percent.
Is that in conflict with the term gap housing lower down that goes
up to 150 percent?
MR. GIBLIN: Gap housing must be owner-occupied up to 150
percent. And employer-owned --
COMMISSIONER CARON: Can only go up--
MR. GIBLIN: To 140.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay.
MR. GIBLIN: And again, that's per state statute. The ESP
housing is capped at 140 percent.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Cormac, could you tell us why you think
Page 12
1 6" I A l..
Noveml;er 28, 2007
or anybody thinks we need this additional category when it seems to
already be covered in the multitude of other categories we already
have?
MR. GIBLIN: What we have heard in the past is that a major
employer in town, an essential service provider employer in town --
take -- just for example, take one ofthe hospitals. They may have a
desire to build housing for their employees. To build that housing,
they would like to avail themselves of a density bonus to make it
affordable and meet their bottom line. Under the current bonus density
system they cannot do that.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But why, when you've got the
percentages there that say household -- if they're going to be within
the 140 percent, which is gap, why couldn't they just apply themselves
to the gap standards that are already in the table inset?
MR. GIBLIN: Because if it's employer-owned, by definition,
they're going to be renting it to their employees.
Right now the table limits gap and workforce to owner-occupied only.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So we don't have any provisions in our
code for rental housing.
MR. GIBLIN: Not at those levels.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So what this is doing is introducing
rental housing in Collier County. Okay, that makes it a lot clearer as to
why it's being --
MR. GIBLIN: As long as it's owned and operated by an essential
services personnel provider.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron, then Mr. Schiffer.
Mr. Midney, did you want to say something too?
COMMISSIONER CARON: So what it is introducing
employer-owned, where you can have an income of $84,000 and get
these bonuses; is that correct? That would be the 140 percent, right?
MR. GIBLIN: Right. And what we see in a lot of job categories
in this income area is registered nurses who may be married to a
Page 13
16 I v:. No~mber 28, 2007
policeman, combined income, they make the workforce and gap
income levels, but still in this market they're having trouble finding
something to rent or own. And so the hospitals, the school board, the
other major employers in town are seeking active ways to try to
provide housing for their employees.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, Mr. Schiffer, then Mr. Midney.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Mr. Klatzkow wants to speak.
MR. KLA TZKOW: I don't know what it means. I've read this
five times, I still don't know what it means.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Klatzkow, we're trying to struggle
with that, too. I'm just wondering though why you're just now saying
that to us.
MR. KLATZKOW: I'm just -- I've been listening to the
explanations and I still don't understand what this means.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Wasn't this supposed to be reviewed by
all departments before it got here today? I mean, legal, too?
MR. KLATZKOW: lt is a private amendment, and he's coming
forward. And on a private amendment we let the private petitioner
come forward and have their day.
And what I'm telling you is I don't know what it means and I
don't understand the explanations.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does that mean that all our LDC
amendments don't have legal sufficiency review prior to coming to us?
MR. KLATZKOW: No, no, no. I've reviewed these. But for
private -- for the private ones, I don't go to the private guy and sit
down and try to redo their amendment.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So who wrote this? Staff did not write
this? I know you guys introduced it, but staff didn't put it into the
format that we're seeing here today?
So this kind of came through in the dark, we get it presented
today and the first time everybody sees it is today.
MR. GIBLIN: Well, it was submitted months ago. It's gone
Page 14
''''''i
A. '4
November 28, 2007
161
through the DSAC twice. lt has been in staffs hands for quite awhile.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I certainly understand Mr.
Klatzkow's dilemma. Ifhe can't make sense of it, it's going to be hard
for anybody to make legal sense of it.
MR. GIBLIN: Maybe I can try to simplify it.
The first three pages are the definition. If we've already taken the
definition off the table and said just refer to the local Housing
Assistance Plan, then I don't see any reason to include that anymore.
Really, the core of this change is the -- one, two, three, four -- six lines
added under the table on Page 6. That is the core of what we're asking
for, and it is to allow major employers in town to provide housing for
their employees using the density bonus chart.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And the difference here is by using the
chart you can apply it to rentals so you can have more density in your
apartment complexes, for example, so when you have a multi-family
complex, of which we're used to seeing 10, 12 units per acre, you
could have a density bonus that would get you to whatever levels you
can get to based on your mix on this table.
MR. GIBLIN: Correct. Correct.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer? I didn't mean to sidetrack
everybody from your question. Go right ahead.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: No, that's fine, I'm enjoying the
conversation.
Cormac, two things. And one thing is the concept of
discrimination. So this is good discrimination. And what we're going
to do -- I mean, the people that are outside this, is it open to them? I
have a software company, can I take advantage ofthis?
lt looks like no, but what if I wrote construction-oriented
software, would I then be able to? Would an architectural --
MR. GIBLIN: That would be up for the county to interpret the
definition.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But you see my point is there's a
Page 15
""'6'" ~ 4
",. r .',
JL ' ;, ..
November 28, 2007
line somewhere. That line is a form of discrimination and that can be
abused.
Second thing, growing up in the northeastern part of
Pennsylvania, the company town with the coal mines, is this going to
create company condos, which could be an abusive environment for
the employees? Is that what the intent is here?
MR. GIBLIN: No, I think the intent is here, as Mr. Murray
alluded to earlier, is to allow a coalition of different major employers
in town to come together, provide a safe, decent, affordable housing
option for their employees.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But the problem is the rental,
that means that they own the unit the person lives in, therefore, their
job controls their ability to live in that unit. So why can't we write
something that really lets them bring people to town, let them buy a
unit, and then from that point on it's free market.
I mean, the concern I have is that becomes a control device. Their
history has shown where that's not a good handle on --
MR. GIBLIN: It was really our decision to limit this to only that
ESP category, because -- rather than open it up to any employer. But I
think maybe to address some of your concerns, maybe that is the angle
to take on this, is just to allow rentals at the gap in workforce level to
meet that market demand.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right. And the other thing is that
these condos will be then totally filled by people who work in that
particular business, especially if it's a single employer owned. I mean,
is that the healthiest environment, versus mixing the rest of the
community together?
MR. GIBLIN: It would depend on what other options are out
there for the residents.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The intent of providing housing
is excellent. I think what the state is trying to do is probably good. But
the concern I have is the rental part. I mean, if you brought somebody
Page 16
If)' f -A' 1 "".~,
,f,,,,
November 28, 2007
to town, you sold them a unit, that's a good idea. The fact that you're
discriminating from other people using the unit could be dangerous
too. lt is -- can be the slippery slope.
Thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, the more I look at this, I
like it. You know, we've always been sort of brought up with the idea
that if you own your own home it's better because you're going to take
better care of it. That's, I think, a lot of the basis behind Habitat and,
you know, the push to try to get people to own their own home.
But in the current environment, just the way things are,
owner-occupied is really impossible for so many people. People can't
afford to get a down payment and to go through -- to get that huge of a
loan in order to afford a house, you know, working people in the
county. And I think a lot of people would be able to get into a rental
thing where they couldn't necessarily afford to buy a house.
So I think that -- you know, no one is forcing the people to rent
there, but I think it could open up housing in a way that, you know,
the programs that we have now that are all focused on ownership can't.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray, then Mr. Vigliotti.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Let me try one more shot at that.
If I understand you correctly, the intent of employer-owned was
to allow for rentals. If the Sheriff cannot own property, that means
none of the deputies can rent unless they rent someplace else at a
disadvantaged rate, potentially. This is intended to cure a
disadvantaged rate because of their salary. Whether we agree with that
or not is unimportant. I think that premise is valid.
So my question is, are we not unintentionally creating a problem?
Are you representing CWHIPP in any case here? Are you representing
the coalition?
MR. GIBLIN : No, sir.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: You've been asked by staff to do
Page 17
i:1f1
1'/
. r'\
. '.
A 4
November 28, 2007
something?
MR. GIBLIN: No, I'm representing a private petitioner that's not
affiliated with the CWHIPP.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: The impact on this whole
coalition could be serious. I'm concerned.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Who are you representing?
MR. GIBLIN: It is Vernon Ray.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Okay. I have to go along with
Brad. I don't like the idea of rentals. I think what people really want is
a chance to buy and own, the pride of ownership. And if you can get
people into a house, because we do have programs -- if you can get
people into a house, as the house escalates, they're in the market. If
people rent, they'll never get out of that rental cycle.
And I'm really concerned with seeing a development of 2,000
houses, okay, called, you know, the hospital complex.
MR. GIBLIN: I think what Mr. Midney's check hit on a minute
ago was a valid point also, though. Not everyone is ready for home
ownership at the same time. Some people may just be moving to the
community. You know, this community has a need for rental housing
as well as owner-occupied housing.
And the current county programs, as evidenced by this very
change that we're asking for, are all geared to provide only that one
type of owner-occupied housing. There's housing needs across the
entire spectrum in this county, and I don't think anybody is
envisioning a company town or trapped employment or anything like
that.
I'm sure that these employers, if they would take advantage of
this, they would say rent here at a discounted rate thanks to the density
bonus for a period of a year, two years, three years, whatever it takes.
But by the very means that we're providing this to you at a discount,
you will be on your way to home ownership sooner, because you're
Page 18
161A4tt
November 28, 2007
not being forced to pay 50 percent of your income in rent.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I understand what you're
saying, but there's got to be a way to limit it. Once we open the door, I
can envision large apartment complexes. If there was a way to limit it
by percentage, so many allowed to be purchased, so many allowed as
rentals, I'd like it a lot better.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Mr. Adelstein, Ms. Caron, and
then Mr. Schiffer.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I understand, for example, let's
take that hospital idea. They're now able to build the homes and get it
straightened out. And the idea for them is so they can rent them. And
when they're renting them:, these people know they have to work there
in order to live there.
Now, coming up with this affordable housing situation was not
an idea of rental, it was an idea of a person who can eventually own a
home. In this situation, if I don't like the way you work for my
hospital I'm going to say you either do this or you won't work here
anymore, or you can work here but I'm going to have to put you out of
your house, because you're renting it.
This was not the beginning or anywhere I ever read until now.
We're talking about affordable housing to be bought by people who
are far less financially helped than people who go work for the
hospital, and yet we're still being able to put houses in their ownership
and still getting along with doing it. I haven't seen very many of them
who had to foreclose it. I haven't found any of them yet in the
newspaper.
This idea of rental is not something that's going to say we're
going to do nice. The hospital is going to say we're going to make sure
we hold on to our people, because they can't stay in our house unless
they work in our building. I don't like that at all.
MR. GIBLIN: With respect, I think maybe that the employers
may look at it from the opposite perspective, that providing the
Page 19
1"6 I A },
November 28, 2007
housing will enable them to attract the highest quality and best
employees, and that they see it as providing an additional service to
their employees.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I think you're thinking it in
your way from your respect, but mostly people who want to do this
want to own a home if they possibly can. Almost everybody does
want to.
In this situation, one of the major people in our whole county
here, the hospitals, are going to be able to say you're going to be able
to rent here, but you aren't going to be able to buy here. And that's not
the way these -- this will force the people to do what they have to do
to live there. That's not what this is supposed to be.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Wouldn't they have the opportunity to
rent somewhere, and then when they get done, and saving enough
money, they can go buy somewhere else?
MR. GIBLIN: That I think is the premise here.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron, Mr. Schiffer, then Mr.
Midney.
COMMISSIONER CARON: The one issue that did come out
was you began to list criteria that might be involved in this, like, for
example, people only rent for a year or two and then can move along.
And I don't see any criteria here, and this is the Land Development
Code, and there should be criteria, I would think, involved. This is the
place for it. And it would seem to me that we would establish criteria
for this.
MR. GIBLIN: I agree that there needs to be some type of
governing criteria. I'm not sure the LDC is the place for it. I think that
that might be something for the private sector to work out.
If you are offering terms that are unattractive to your employees
then they're not going to rent there. If they are attractive, then they are
going to rent it. I don't know if that needs to be set hard and fast in the
LOC.
Page 20
161
m n
L 't ; ~//n"
November 28, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer, Mr. Midney, and then I'm
going to take a few minutes to comment if I could, since everybody
else has had one or two times.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Mark, you go ahead.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, go ahead, after you, and then Mr.
Midney.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Let me give an example of a
concern I have. I had a client, he had multiple operations around the
state, and as we'd fly around he would brag that one of his secrets to
success was that he would buy the manager their house, essentially
they would live in his house. And once the garage got full of junk, he
had them, because he could control them, because if they ever, you
know, acted out, he could throw them out ofthe house.
So that's kind of my concern.
And also, I think congregating the same group of people in one
apartment building.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, it sounds as though some of
the objections is that this somehow is discouraging home ownership.
And nothing in this is against ownership, this is just an alternative for
people who can't own.
And when you look at the credit market right now, there's a lot of
people who are going to be having a hard time owning something but
could afford to rent.
And the other thing is I don't think that you have to say that the
hospital or whatever has to allow the people to only stay in the rental
housing for a certain number of years and then kick them out. If the
person likes it there and is working, I don't think that you should force
that there be sort of a time limit on this.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney, you hit on a point that I
wanted to make, and that is that the credit market is tightening up.
And from all -- and I just got done reading some articles this morning
Page 21
^ t.
1 ~r Vi .t+
,.:; November 28, 2007
before I came here.
It's going to get worse in '08 and '09. Rentals are going to be a
necessity. There is nothing wrong with a rental. In fact, the only way
you save money up for a home, unless you inherit, is to rent
somewhere while you put your money away and save it up.
The problem with this proposal is it seems to want to define
rentals to a selective group of people, and I'm not sure we need to do
that. I think instead we might want to consider scrapping this whole
way you're presenting here today, add an additional table that works
out bonuses for the rental market. And if an employer or whoever
wants to involve themselves with affordable rentals, they go to that
table.
Now, how they rent them out, whether it's to their employees or
to the general public, they can do that through private deed
restrictions, and then they can take the liability for any kind of
discrimination issues that may come out of that. We don't need to. We
simply are providing the opportunity to allow rentals with some
bonuses.
I'm not sure what they'd be. I'm not sure if the BCC and this
board or others would recommend that the bonuses be the same as
ownership homes, because ownership homes are a priority here.
So maybe we work out a double table, one for ownership and one for
rentals, and everything goes away, all the definitions apply and we're
all set to go, just like we are. That's a suggestion.
Ms. Fabacher?
MS. F ABACHER: Fabacher. Thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Your last name sometimes is like Nick's,
but it's not quite so bad.
MS. F ABACHER: Thank you. I just wanted to correct what
might have been a misimpression. Staff does review the private
amendments that come in. This has been reviewed by the zoning
department. I spoke with the staff at the housing department.
Page 22
161 A 4
November 28, 2007
Now, perhaps it would have been better to have given you a
written recommendation, but once we discussed it, they didn't have
any problem with it. It's distributed to all of the directors of all the
departments and --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You know, Catherine, what I think
there's maybe be some disconnect is, all these laws and words we put
in place seem fine. They seem fine to us, the EAC, the DSAC, the
BCC even. But what it boils down to, what is fine in regards to the
attorneys that analyze it when they come before us six months, a year
or five years down the road, and then we end up in court battles.
So from my perspective, more important than your review is the
county attorney's. And then he tells us he can't even understand -- he
doesn't even understand what this means, that raises a flag for me,
why are we even here when we can't even get a sufficient legal
revIew.
And if Jeff had a problem with this before it got here, by God, it
should have been addressed before it got here. So that's where I was
coming from. We have got to be able to do things that are defendable
legally in this county. And the only way we do that is with legal
review ahead of time.
So I wasn't saying staff internally didn't do it. I just want to make
sure legal review is done thoroughly before it comes to us.
MS. F ABACHER: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I just wanted to offer
maybe the option that perhaps we could defer it to our next meeting.
In the meantime I could get a recommendation from our housing
department.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think -- based on what I'm hearing
today, I definitely think this is going to be deferred to our next
meeting.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I won't vote for it.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer, before you say it again,
Mr. Murray did have his hand up before you, and then we'll go back to
Page 23
l' {- .>;
L \.' '. .'"'~"".'"
November 281, 2007
you.
Mr. Murray?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I don't want to keep on kicking
the goose here, but I want to straighten some details out. What I do
know, and I don't pretend to know everything that's going on, but I
have some affiliation with this group.
Let me make something clear, because I am a member of the
board of the hospitals, and I will tell you that they are not in the
business of owning homes. They are concerned, at least I know at
HMA's homes, the Physician's Regional, they were interested in a
right of first refusal that they could have an opportunity for their
employees. They're not concerned with that.
I recognize there may be some Simon Legrees out there, but I
know that NCH historically has -- when they bring in their nurses,
they put them up, they put them up in rental quarters. And they'd love
to be able to facilitate that a little easier than what they do now.
They're not interested, it's not their central work. They're
interested in trying to make available clean, adequate housing for, say,
a young nurse who can't afford a 1,500 square foot apartment, could
afford a 700 square foot, maybe, if there was another nurse. That type
of arrangement, that saves them money, they can get an opportunity to
either choose to leave or they could buy a home.
Focusing exclusively on home purchasing is short-sighted on this
part, so I recognize the desirability of doing this. But again, I'll state
again clearly that I think the coalition needs to represent -- to be here
to talk about this issue, and I would ask them to do that.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Cormac, why is it important that
you put in employer-owned all the time? In other words, why couldn't
a private developer take advantage of this, build a rental thing with the
intent to rent to essential services?
MR. GIBLIN: That was our decision to limit it and just to this
Page 24
1 6 t N~ve~~er 28, 2007
category of employers, rather than open it up to the general public,
because of previous direction by the Board of County Commissioners
that rentals maybe were not such a good idea.
But I really like Mr. Strain's idea that we should open it up to --
my feeling is that we should open it up to anyone and everyone who
wants to build affordable housing, be it rental or ownership, and not
get into this restrictions on who your employer is.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right. And I think the concept
of employer-owned, obviously I've expressed a concern. Imagine the
construction company building an apartment building with a bus that
picks up all the workers every -- I mean, look where that could go.
And the civil rights laws have spent a long time weeding out what that
could start to bring back in.
The second thing is when you do rent this thing, you pay
somebody a salary, how does the value of this rental apply to his
salary? Is it a benefit, is it cheap rent, is it market rent?
MR. GIBLIN: Well, it would be cheap rents. The rent would be
controlled by the percentage of median income that the units are set
aside for, just like the current system. So it would be a reduced rate
from market rate.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Essentially wouldn't that add to
a salary then, the reduction from market rate? And thus could that
throw him out of the program? But anyway, that's a bookkeeping
thing.
I think the concern is that if you went through here and scrapped
the word employer-owned everywhere you put it, I would be a lot
more comfortable with this. Because if a private developer did it then,
you know, the Sheriff could live next to the nurse, who could live next
to the construction worker, which to me is healthier.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Brad, if you scrapped the word
employer-owned, basically then what you've got is the same definition
practically as gap. So why add another definition just to scrap the
Page 25
16' ...,~,j '''lJ.~I;'
.'''''lr';~
November 28, 2007
word employer-owned?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Because it gives you a little bit
bigger benefits than gap, doesn't it? I mean, that's why you're --
otherwise why do this?
MR. GIBLIN: Again, to underline what Mr. Strain said a
moment ago, perhaps the easiest solution here is, the first star under
the chart on Page 6, strike through that entire line, giving the entire
chart to rental, owner-occupied, public, private.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Now, I didn't say, though -- what I'm
concerned about is we are trying to encourage home ownership. We're
not trying to encourage rentals in this county.
But I think that rentals are going to be a necessity with the
marketplace and the credit crunch coming ahead of us in the next two
years. And out of fairness, we ought to supply rentals.
Therefore, I'm not sure we want to provide the same incentive for
rentals that we do for home occupancy, because if we're trying to
promote more home occupancy, the incentive rate should be higher,
and the rental incentive rates might be changed.
So that's why I was suggesting a different table. And that is
something that BCC direction certainly would be where they would
decide where to go.
But I know from listening to the meetings that they prefer home
ownership. And I'm sure that there will be weighted tables in that
regard if this were to happen that way.
Mr. Klatzkow, is there anything you wanted to add to this?
MR. KLATZKOW: The difference between when staff presents
something and when the private sector presents something is I can sit
down with staff and I can say what is it that you're really trying to get
at here.
And when the private petitioner comes in, he has a project in
mind. I don't know what that project is, and he's trying to change the
LDC to get that project, and then we're trying to guess at what that
Page 26
It ' A 4
November 28, 2007
project is and what the ramifications are. And I've still listened to this
and I still don't know what he's trying to get at here.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think we're in agreement with you.
MR. KLATZKOW: Perhaps if you could explain what the
project this client wants placed in, we could then more intelligently
deal with this amendment.
MR. GIBLIN: This change would be used in a --let's say in a
PUD setting, someone building multi-family condominium buildings
and would like the opportunity to sell maybe a block of six or 10 or 12
to the hospital, blocks of 10 to the fire department, a block of 10 to the
county to provide affordable rental housing to their employees.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: They're doing that now.
MR. KLATZKOW: So this is what Ave Maria is trying to do.
MR. GIBLIN: They cannot do that with the density bonus the
way it's currently written.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: If you go down to Manatee Road and
951, there's a project behind the Coral Isle Mall called Rookery.
They're renting out to the hotels on Marco, they're renting out to
different employers blocks of building at a time, and then the
employers put people in there.
MR. GIBLIN: And you can do that --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, so--
MR. GIBLIN: -- but you cannot use a density bonus to make it
even more affordable.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm not sure that they're not using it, but
either way I understand what you're saying there.
I don't think this is going to fly here today.
Mr. Vigliotti?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: What is our procedure from
here? Are we going to rewrite this or do we get to vote yes or no, and
he goes back and tries and tries and rewrites it?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's where I was just headed, but I
Page 27
161
!~
November 28, 2007
wanted to give you the opportunity, because I thought you were going
to -- if you have another question?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: No --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh, okay. Well, then if--
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: -- I want to wrap it up.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- all our questions are finished here
today, I think the direction of this board is it's not going to work and
you might want to come back with something better on our next time
around, because that's the only next chance we're going to have before
it's got to go either forward or not.
MR. GIBLIN: I will see you on the 12th at 5:05 and I'll have
something to Catherine by the end of this week.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Keep an eye on the timing of the
meeting and communicate with Catherine, because if we don't get
through a lot today, I'm going to request staffto squeeze in more
nights and afternoons between now and the 21st of December, because
there's no reason we can't finish this cycle in December. And we will
finish it in December. So there may be another date squeezed in there,
too.
MR. GIBLIN: Great. Thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, sir.
Okay, before we do the video, Joe, I'd like to finish the public
participation here. I'd like to go into the sign ordinance with Ms. Krier
as the next one.
MS. F ABACHER: All right. Our next one will be on Page 43,
and that's going to be the -- actually open house signs. We're going to
go ahead and perhaps take the speakers first. I think Mr. Poteet asked
to speak first.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay.
MS. FABACHER: Page 43. Page D on your summary sheet. Mr.
Poteet.
MR. POTEET: Thank you. For the record, my name is William
Page 28
'1
J,
M 4
November 28,2007
H. Poteet, Jr. I represent the Naples Area Board of Realtors, and we're
here to discuss open house signs.
And the reason the need's there is prior to the original adoption of
the Land Development Code everybody had open house signs in town,
and everybody was doing business and everything was fine.
But subsequently, once the LDC was adopted, the staff over at
code enforcement determined that it was not included in the code and
therefore it was illegal. So now we have illegal open house signs all
throughout Collier County. Not in the City of Naples, but just in
Collier County.
So what we decided to do is I called up Michelle Arnold and
asked to meet with her to see if we could come up with some type of
resolution to correct this, because the realtors are really just trying to
serve their clients.
We have over 12,000 clients out there right now that want to sell
their properties, and one of the best vehicles that we know is the tried
and true open house. So in order to get people to the open house, they
have to be able to know it's open. And you need a sign in front of the
building and possibly a directional sign to show you where it is,
because some of the listings are at the end of streets that are almost a
mile long.
So we met with -- we called Michelle up, we set up a meeting
with Mr. Schmitt and Michelle, and Michelle could not attend but she
sent Dave Scribner from code enforcement. And we had a very, very
productive meeting. We told them our concerns, they told their
concerns, and what you see today is a partial draft of what we
discussed.
The only thing that is missing on that particular draft is we talked
about the directional sign. And we're not trying to be sign crazy,
because we understand one of the complaints that was out there in the
community is I see signs everywhere. We wanted to have open houses
signs just during open house periods. We wanted to make sure that we
Page 29
A 4
November 28, 2007
limited the hours of the open houses, so you don't go by at 7:00 in the
evening and see the sign still out there in the street. If they're going to
have an open house sign, they put it up between 10:00 and 5:00 and
have their open house and then go away after that.
The directional sign, it was also discussed, but was not in the
draft here, unfortunately. And I've had discussions with Mr. Schmitt
about it, and he and I have been e-mailing back and forth some
suggestions on how to do that. And ifhe would like to tell you what
we've talked about, that would be great.
MR. SCHMITT: For the record, Joe Schmitt.
Bill is in fact correct. We talked about this. And one of the
problems also is code enforcement. We on some weekends pick up
maybe 100 to 150 of these what we call snipe signs, some of which
are for sale signs, open house signs. And it is somewhat a disservice, I
guess, if you want to look at it, to the person trying to sell the home,
because they put these signs out there.
Our code mandates that we pick them up. I think the code was
probably a bit too restrictive. The concern here is where do you want
these signs.
But the other issue is, for instance, the -- let's say a home is for
sale in the Estates where you kind of want to lead somebody to the
right street down a direction, but how many directional -- we'll call
them directional signs, even though that is a term specifically dealing
with our sign terminology, so we may have to call it something
different. But auxiliary open house signs or whatever we call it.
But what would be appropriate to put these out, at the comer of
the major thoroughfare. We do not want these in the median, that was
made clear. What this does allow is for them to be 10 feet from the
edge of pavement, so the restriction now currently says they cannot be
in the right-of-way at all.
The other issue here was we wanted to make sure there was a
time limit and we wanted to make sure there was also identification on
Page 30
161 :j 4
':1
I"a
November 28c, 2007
the sign, who put that sign out so we can make sure if they're -- we
pick them up beyond the time limits or they're there and they're left
there, we can certainly deal with it through a neighbor. But the intent
here between Bill and Ellie and I and Michelle and Dave Scribner was
trying to sort out the balance between making sure we do not stifle the
opportunity or the attempt of people trying to sell real estate but at the
same time make sure we don't have sign proliferation.
So I guess maybe we're looking for your guidance on this as well
as have any suggestions dealing with how many signs do you think
would be appropriate. It's hard to describe how we would do that. A
thousand feet, no more than 1,000 feet near the existing sign or in
front of the open house, that property that's conducting the open
house. But then how many more signs do we allow, for instance in the
Estate, all the way up to the Golden Gate Boulevard? I don't know.
You guys -- looking for your guidance on this.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I have a suggestion. I think
they're necessary, for one. But if you put an address on them and you
allotted each open house to have two or three, with that address, code
enforcement could keep track of it, because each sign would have an
address. And if you had 20 for one address that would be overkill, but
if you had just two or three, that would be a starting point with an
address to track.
MR. SCHMITT: And that was my suggestion, no more than
1,000 feet apart, no more than, I believe, three, two to three?
MR. POTEET: You didn't put a number. Our original discussion
was we wanted one directional sign and be able to put it at the end of
the street so we can get them down the street to the house.
Where we run into problems occasionally is if we have more than
one open house going on in the street, and so you'll have a person
halfway down the street has his open house, and the guy at the other
end of the street, nobody goes to it because they thought they already
Page 31
1 ~.'.~ A 4
,,>' ',../
November 28, 2007
got there. So we were going to allow one open house sign per open
house, so they could put another one of them down the street.
But he had suggested no closer than 1,000 feet from the actual
house. But then you run into problems if the house is only three or
four houses in on the block, people that are driving on the cross street
are not going to see the open house sign because they're too far into
the street. So you still need the directional sign at the beginning of the
street.
That's where we really want to make sure that at the beginning of
the street that the open house is on that we have the ability to have a
sign. And this does not preclude those gated communities, they'll have
separate for themselves. This is just in the Golden Gate proper -- or
not Golden Gate proper but the county.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: But Bill --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: -- unless there's an address on
each sign, there's no way to keep track of it. If at the end of a park you
had two oftherm, one for each address, okay, you'd bring people
down there, and they'd know if they went to each one, and then one at
the house --
MR. POTEET: That could be done. I mean, what we've acquired
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You guys, before you go too far, you've
both got to wait till the other one completely finishes talking, because
every word you say has to be recorded, and she can't take two at the
same time. So let him finish before you start, then you start. And we'll
go back and forth like that.
MR. POTEET: I understand.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Again, as a beginning point,
without an address on each sign there's no way to keep track of them
for code enforcement. And if you allow two or three maximum, then
Joe could work the space limitations out from you, I feel more
Page 32
16,A 4
November 28, 2007
comfortable with it.
MR. POTEET: Now, on the address, you just want the address
for information for code enforcement, is that the purpose?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: No, the address for the people
driving down the street. In other words, open house, 125 Jones Lane,
on the particular sign. So now when they see an open house sign
there's an address tied to it and they'll go looking for that. If there's a
sign next to it saying open house, 425 Smith Street down the same
road, they'll know to go to Smith street or Jones Lane. lt would be an
advantage for you because it will help solve that poor guy down at the
end of the block that never got visited.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Morning, Mr. Poteet.
MR. POTEET: Good morning, Mr. Murray.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: How do we feel about multiple
signs at the comer of Jones Lane and directing people to seven homes
that are up for sale? How do we feel about that, the proliferation of
that? Well, that wouldn't be a proliferation, just their being there.
That's a problem, too, isn't it? You would recognize that as an issue.
MR. POTEET: It could be a problem. There would be times that
you would have multiple open houses on the street, yes.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Because I live in a condominium
and there are multiple homes for sale and multiple open houses. I don't
object to it personally, because people should try to be able to sell
their property ifthey want. But it does -- I've also passed places in the
Estates where I've looked and I've said oh, my, there's six signs, there's
six signs suggesting that there are people selling homes on that street.
I think that hurts the character of the neighborhood to some degree. So
I don't know if that impacts on it.
MR. POTEET: The reason we went to code enforcement and
through community development is to come up with a plan that the
community may accept in order to resolve a problem that's out there
Page 33
~ ."""i
t"
I . ~
-.J\.. '
~1
V\li
November 28, 2007
already, because people are violating the rules as it is right now. We
want to cure it. We want to be able to go back to our folks and tell
them these are the rules.
Now these will also apply to the FSBO's. They will have the
same responsibilities and the same opportunities that's out there.
Because currently what they're doing is illegal also.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I wonder if a single sign, for
instance, a sign that directs people down Jones Lane that might say
open house today with a little tab that could be used to get an S in
there, open houses, or however it might be done, that would be a
single sign as a directional sign. And the specific signs at the property
might be useful.
Does that have any credence, any credibility?
MR. POTEET: I could see us saying that we could have one open
house sign at the beginning of a street --
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: That makes sense to me --
MR. GIBLIN: -- and whichever realtor gets there first puts up the
sign, and that's fine.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I have a question of staff. Is this a
private-driven LDC amendment?
MS. F ABACHER: No, this came from community development.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So Mr. Poteet is speaking as a member
of the public?
MS. F ABACHER: Yes, sir.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And so are the other people, Ms.
Krier and -- okay, so this wasn't private like Cormac.
MS. F ABACHER: Right. Correct.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Cormac initiated a broad request for an
LDC amendment as a private sector individual. How does that differ
from what I'm hearing here now? This is being done for a private
sector as well. How is it any different then what Cormac came before
us?
Page 34
L
A 4
November 28, 2007
The reason I'm asking is we're directing all our interaction
between the citizens' comments and we should be directing them to
staff for analysis. And I'm just wondering where the fine line is.
Mr. Adelstein, I'll get to you in just a minute.
MR. SCHMITT: The fine line, Cormac's dealing with a specific
issue dealing with a specific client to amend the code for a particular
situation that he wanted to solve.
When I -- we've been talking -- I've been talking to NABR about
this probably for over a year, different times, about the problems. lt's a
problem for code.
And from a community development perspective, when NABR
asked to meet again with staff, it is a mutually -- it solves mutual
problems, for them as well as us. To me it alleviates some of the
resources that I have to devote on weekends to go out and pick up
signs. So that's the fine line.
lt's an amendment that we proceeded with because it does give
me some -- it basically relaxes some of the restrictions that are in
place, and then it gives me the opportunity to use my resources
elsewhere.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I was just trying to make sure that when
we get down to this, the direction we have to respond to basically is
staff and how they're putting this together and they're going to
interpret it. And the public input is needed more so that we go in the
right direction.
MR. SCHMITT: That's correct. lt's a staff-initiated, mainly
because of the resource issues, and frankly, from that standpoint that's
-- I'm looking at it strictly as I can use resources elsewhere, especially
on weekends, when I'm looking at code enforcement, rather than go
out and picking up 100 signs. I can pick up 100 snipe signs and not
worry about the open house signs. I mean that's, frankly, that's the
Issue.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What's a snipe sign?
Page 35
I 6 I ..~ ({ij~
November 28, 2007
MR. SCHMITT: lt's a nickname for these little signs they pull on
the road, you know, call me if you're going to get foreclosed, or cars
for sale, or -- isn't that what we call them, Michelle? They're snipe
signs, they're just --
MR. KLATZKOW: Signs put on other peoples' property.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I've never head of that before.
MR. SCHMITT: You see them on the road, carpets for sale, open
house, garage sale. We probably pick up a hundred of them a weekend
or more.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein, would you ask your
question please.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Yes, I'm talking about Palm
Drive, which is the first street up this way. Up now we have almost all
the realtors going up to one end and stating which ones are open, and
at the back end, the same thing. And then on the additional spot, the
same thing. This goes on from approximately II :00 in the morning
and then till about 3:00,4:00 in the afternoon.
But at the front of the place, you see where they are and you can
write it down. Coming out the other way you can do exactly the same
thing.
Now they can go into this home with usually a realtor involved,
and that way it doesn't seem to bother any of the other people that are
living there. It's a very simple thing, usually on Sundays. And by 5:00,
5:30, they're gone, the signs and all.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah, I actually was just going to
talk about the actual language here.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'd like to get past the public speakers so
we can get to the staff who wrote the language, and then we can go
from there.
Any other questions of Mr. Poteet?
MS. KRIER: Good morning, Ellie Krier for the record,
Page 36
'1 I' [; ill "
I. t, J, f}n
",c .,,) jJJvem'lir 28, 2007
representing the Naples Area Board of Realtors.
Just two things. If you look on your Page 44 and 45, you'll see on
44, on items 2.A and 2.B, the final paragraph, in parens, no building
permit required. I would ask that that be added to whatever your final
language is. I'm sure that was the intent, but I think that needs to be in
there.
And I would like to address briefly Mr. Strain's comments.
Unlike the prior petitioner, we're here to solve a problem for Collier
County residents. Yes, they're our clients, but there's no unknown
project lurking behind us, it's people trying to sell their homes.
And with regard to multiple signs at the end of the street, which
Mr. Adelstein referred to, as well as Mr. Murray, if a realtor or that
street chooses to have six open houses on one day, it may indeed hurt
them, but that's what the free market allows them to do. It's a public
information that we're trying to convey. They can choose whether they
want to be one of seven or wait till the next Sunday and show it
themselves in isolation.
I don't think that that's the county's need to get into what should
be a free market situation there.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I'd just like to ask Ms. Krier a
question.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sure, go ahead, Mr. Murray.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I think you misunderstood me,
anyway. I was referring to places like the Estates where you're driving
and there then would be, say, six or seven signs at a street where the
homes are way down. I have no objection to home after home after
home having their own sign. I thought that it would be not beneficial
to a community to have all of these signs on a single thing. lt draws a
negative attention.
Recognizing that yes, it is a free market issue, I have no problem
beyond that.
MS. KRIER: Finally, in answer to Mr. Schmitt's question about
Page 37
16 I A 4
November 28, 2007
the word directional, you could always use off-site open house sign as
language that would adequately describe what they are.
Thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Okay, back to the language
of the document. We have it several pages, starting on Page 43.
Does anybody on the planning commission have comments or
questions about the actual language, now that we've heard the
discussion from the public?
Ms. Caron, then Mr. Schiffer.
COMMISSIONER CARON: I have a question about the term
erected. I believe that the signs that we're talking about are these signs
that you just stick in the ground. They're like -- they're essentially
cardboard signs with little metal posts to get them into the ground. I
don't think that they require construction, which seems to be the term
here.
And I just want to make sure that I am correct, and perhaps we
can change that word to may be placed.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, actually, if you look in D and
others, you've got a good point. They use the words located.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Or located, sure.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Another word would probably be better
there, certainly. So I'm sure staff can come up with a word for that. Is
that okay, Catherine?
MS. F ABACHER: Yes, it's fine. Located is good, installed. I
agree if the other text says located, that would be good.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anything else, Mr. Caron?
COMMISSIONER CARON: That's fine for now. I think we've
made a couple of other comments that will come back.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And my suggestion is I think
obviously the two-by-two sign is good at the location. I like Bob
Vigliotti's idea of actually putting the address.
Page 38
16 I' n
, .. .. /J r ~
I .1'Jov~ber 28, 2007
So maybe what we'll do -- I would suggest that we add another
sign, I think, calling it an off-site address sign where you allow an
additional two square feet, which essentially is one-foot by two-foot
where you do put the address. And then that way the realtors can have
their normal two-by-two and then have something that's adjustable
with the address that they could stick on the top or bottom.
Ifwe allow just one of those at their prime intersection with the
address, then not have a whole series of arrow signs leading down, I
think that would be good.
I think the size is important to the people that are going to be in
vehicles reading it, you don't want people stopping on right-of-ways to
take addresses off.
So again, one sign at the premise, the two-by-two, and then an
additional one-by -- well, I'll make it two square feet, that would have
the address to be attached to it off-site. And I guess we can call that
the off-site address sign, and that would do it.
Second thing, Joe, I wish you were in my Boy Scout troop with
this snipe hunt. We would have a lot of fun with you. But
unfortunately you would come back with something and spoil the
whole thing, so.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any other comments on the
language?
Mr. Vigliotti.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: On Page 44, number 2.A, one
ground sign with a maximum height of six feet?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: This is existing language. The only
language for discussion today is the language that's underlined.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Okay. Thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Under G, during supervised real
estate open houses. I'm just wondering why we need supervised in
there. If I were an owner, I would think I would be there. If! were an
Page 39
16/
/~1
,
;j q
November 28, 2007
agent representing an owner, I would be there. That's the supervised, I
would assume.
Is there anything other than supervised real estate open houses?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Catherine, you were just asked a
question.
MS. FABACHER: I'm sorry, excuse me.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Are there any other -- is there
any other thing than a supervised real estate open house?
MS. FABACHER: I would think if you leave a lock box and
some brochures, you could put an open house sign, people could
wander in and look around themselves.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm not sure you'd want that. I think if
you leave the words --
MS. F ABACHER: I think that's what supervised means, is that
there's staff available to show the house.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yes, I understand that. But you're
requiring it as supervised. Suppose somebody -- it says during
supervised. So you're just suggesting that ifthere were no supervision,
what?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: lt couldn't have a model (sic) home sign
MS. F ABACHER: You couldn't have this sign.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: You can't have a sign.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Why would they need one ifnobody
could get in to see the house?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I agree, I would never want
anybody going in without -- I don't know if it was superfluous
language, that's all. I'm glad you qualified it.
MS. FABACHER: Excuse me.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes, ma'am.
MS. F ABACHER: Mrs. Arnold just pointed out that the sign that
we've allowed with the existing language is technically also off-site,
Page 40
It
A 4
November 28, 2007
even though it's in the right-of-way adjacent to the parcel. It's still not
on the property. lt's in our right-of-way, 10 feet from the pavement.
So just not to be confusing, because this would be a second
off-site. When you say one off-site sign, she's correct in saying that
the sign that's going to be at the property is actually off-site because
it's in the right-of-way and not on the property. And so then you may
just -- work with the words on that, that's all she'd like me to point out.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'd been wanting to get to two points.
Number one is how many model (sic) signs are we proposing per lot?
MS. F ABACHER: Open house.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: How many open house signs are we
proposing per open house?
MS. FABACHER: We're proposing, as I understand now, we're
proposing the one that's going to be adjacent and abutting the lot, and
then there's going to be the one we call the off-site address sign.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The one that's adjacent, abutting the lot,
how are we limiting it to one? Is there somewhere in here that says
one? I might have missed that.
MS. FABACHER: lt says an. We can change an open house to
one open house sign.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I would think so. Because in the
following sentence you refer to plurality of signs. And I would -- I
wouldn't want anybody to mix up and come out there with 20 signs
just to cause attention to the open house.
MS. F ABACHER: Thank you for pointing that out.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Brad, before I get finished, did you want
to say --
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: No, that's fine, go ahead.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The directional sign that's been talked
about, off-site and all that. We're back to where off-site means. And I
understand it's in an intersection near streets that are leading to -- with
an address on it.
Page 41
1< 6 I '~'hi ~~
d~~ '..: M If" ~ 1,....
Novem er 28,2007
But we don't want them in the medium, we don't want them
hanging from the light pole. And if they're off-site and they're not in
someone else's front yard and they're at an intersection, where are they
going to be?
MS. F ABACHER: In the right-of-way.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I know, but the right-of-way abuts
someone's front yard. So if I happen to have a comer house on an
intersection, I can expect to wake up in the morning when I'm trying
to cut my lawn and stuff and see 20 real estate signs stacked up out
there with directions to my model home -- or to an open house down
the street?
Is that what we're trying to say is okay?
MS. FABACHER: No, I don't believe so. I think Ms. Krier
suggested that first come, first serve. And that we maybe write
something and say that no two can be within 1,000 feet, you know,
have a distance restriction or something like that.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That still doesn't address my question.
I'm still trying to find out, comer property owners have just as much
right to their piece of the earth as the rest of us do. Just because they
live on a comer, they shouldn't be inundated with signage placed in
their front yards, whether that front yard is part of the right-of-way or
not. My front yard or everybody's front yard is part of some
right-of-way. And you treat it like -- you trim it, you put landscaping
there, you take care of it.
It would be hard to give someone a right just to walk up and stick
a sign in the middle of your lawn or landscape bed and say there's an
open house down the street.
So I'm not saying I'm against it, I'm trying to figure out how we
regulate the placement of it so we don't intrude on someone else's
privacy that we shouldn't be doing.
That's just those two comments are what I had. I think if we limit
it to one on-site -- or, say, off-site, but a contiguous to sign, as we've
Page 42
16' J ~ l"
Ii ":,c,' ,
"',/-
November 28, 2007
done with this language. And by the way, I think the point was well
made, no building permit required. lt should be added to the end like it
is on the others.
And then if we study further this idea of where this directional
sign should go so it's not intruding on someone's privacy, I think that
would be the second way to take a look at it, so.
Mr. Adelstein.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: The idea that I have watched
on this situation is basically we have the sidewalk that goes to the
curb, and that's where the sign goes, not on their property.
In fact, I've watched it now almost every Sunday. And in most
situations, that is always on the curb-in side, and the For Rent,
whatever -- For Sale is on the wherever they want to do it.
But the answer is you always can see it as you drive by because
it's there. And it doesn't really offend anybody because it is not their
property .
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Unfortunately a lot of the county doesn't
have curbs and sidewalks, and where a lot of the real estate is being
sold, in Golden Gate Estates, which is the biggest selling part of the
county, there are no curbs and sidewalks. So that wouldn't fit that
scenario, and that's why I was bringing it up, because all of us out
there have -- could have comer lots and the signs would have to be
stuck on our lawns.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: You're not going to sell it to
them so they so they can get it done?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm not.
So anyway, that's why I -- I think it needs to have more thought
on where that directional sign will go.
Mr. Schiffer.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And this is to Joe, a question.
Do you have any complaints on -- from the citizens on this or --
MR. SCHMITT: I'm going to have to turn to Michelle on that,
Page 43
'11 t. Ill},
1 ',,"/, ~oveiitber 28 2007
,
because I -- dealing with signs --
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Because my point --
MR. SCHMITT: Mostly they are -- the complaints are dealing
with them, the signs not being in the right place. So if you want to
give a little history on this.
MS. ARNOLD: Because we normally --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Michelle Arnold for the record.
MS. ARNOLD: I'm sorry, Michelle Arnold for the record.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You should be used to this by now.
MS. ARNOLD: I should definitely be used to that.
Because we do this on a regular basis in terms of enforcement
going out and picking up these signs, we don't get a lot of complaints.
I think if we don't do it regularly on the weekends and during the
week, we would probably get lots of complaints. So we don't typically
get lots of complaints on this particular issue.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So the question is that it -- this
isn't being driven by the citizens complaining, this is being driven by
the fact that you have been having these snipe hunts and you keep
picking these up.
MS. ARNOLD: Well, I think it's partially driven by, you know,
NABR concerns there, and the market the way it is currently, too.
There's been a concern -- there's been discussions with NABR over
the years of how do we address open house signs so that it can be
sensitive to the citizens as well as that particular industry.
And this is our first attempt to try to address the open house signs
on properties that are being sold. I think that there is still a concern
from NABR's perspective about placement of off-premise open house
signs to attract the public to those properties.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The point Mark made, are you
concerned about that, that if in fact somebody lives on a popular
comer, they could wake up in the morning with a forest of open house
signs?
Page 44
16 I At 1+
November 28, 2007
MS. ARNOLD: That is a concern. Some of the areas that are
prominent for a lot of these open house signs are -- the end of the
street would be commercial, for example, Naples Park. So you're
dealing with commercial property as opposed to residential.
In the Estates, however, you will have that problem where you've
got tons of signs located on somebody's residential property.
That's part of my concerns of proliferation of signs at one
particular comer. And if we could come up with a way to address that
so that it's, you know -- we're not having to pick up ten signs. And if
they are out there beyond the time period that they're allowed, there's
just one sign to pick up, that would be great. Plus it would be
something that addresses the industry.
I don't know how we do that, because you've got real estate --
various real estate companies, so it's not like all of one particular
company is selling the homes that may be on a particular street or in a
particular community, so it is a difficult --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think, Michelle, we're at a point today
where we don't have the complete language to this, and that's been
well documented. But I think direction's been given about our
concerns for better language. Some minor tweaking to the language
that is here, but I think generally G is somewhat in pretty good shape.
But I think what we really need now is to have staff get together with
the real estate people and come back with some refined language on
the directional sign at our next meeting, and we can get this thing over
with and move forward. That might be the most productive way to
resolve this.
Ms. Murry?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I do have one other thought.
Commissioner Caron brought up the issue of erection of a sign, and I
recognize that this would be a responsibility of the condominium
association, but it could apply anywhere.
We had an individual who chose to have installed on the
Page 45
16 fA It
NoverJ;er 28,2007
common property a four-by-four stick in the ground, deep in the
ground, with a post, an extension and a hanging sign that said open
house, you know, for sale by owner. And this was intended to be left
there. And of course, you know, we compelled him to take it down.
But that was in condominium, in common property, which is the
responsibility in my view of the association.
But you also might have that circumstance arising in other
locations where private homes would be for sale.
So I think erection or some language that relates to that is
important because not every open house is going to be simply that.
That's a thought you might take into consideration.
MS. ARNOLD: Well, the size criteria currently contained in
there would probably alleviate that particular problem, a larger than
the current provisions for smaller --
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: The sign itself was probably
within the signage --
MS. ARNOLD: Oh, it was?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: -- but the post stood up probably
six feet, five feet. And so it was clearly visible. It was intended to be
there until that person sold that property.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Under this criteria, though, the height
would be exceeded then. And the action of re-digging that hole and
putting it in the ground, tamping it in and removing it every day,
they'd probably wouldn't want to do that --
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: They didn't do -- intend to
remove, they intended to keep it there.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: This regulation would prevent that.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I hope so.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I do want to wrap this up. But
Mr. Murray brought up a good idea. At the end of the street, the first
sign up could say open house. Now, if you have another realtor
Page 46
16' ,I
:1-
14 Ii '.
November 28,2007
coming in, they would have to either come up with a different sign
that says open houses or some kind of different --
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: A little tab that reveals S--
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: -- something, okay. So one sign
at the end of the block for an open house. And do a tab, we'll come up
with some kind of idea to add an S. So now we have one and then one
at each, in front of the houses.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: lt sounds like the -- realtors are going to
get along and cooperate in sales like that, like the Palestines (sic) and
the Arabs, so good luck in seeing that happen.
But anyway, let's just go ahead and leave it with -- as we've
stated with staff. They'll come back to the next meeting with some
revised language and we'll go from there.
And at this point let's take a break until 10:00 and when we get
back, we'll resume with the -- whatever kind of cartoon we're going to
see. I'm not sure which one now.
(A break was taken.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, everybody. Ifwe resume our
seats.
Yesterday was the Board of County Commissioners meeting in
which the representative of Cocohatchee had asked one of the
commissioners to discuss the possibility of how we should be looking
at this particular issue that's come before us or it's been remanded back
to us. That discussion ensued, and I think I watched it -- I was pretty
clear on what they said, and I think Mr. Schmitt has got a tape for it
for the benefit of everybody here so we can see it again at to providing
direction to this board on the 13th Cocohatchee Bert Harris claim
Issue.
MR. SCHMITT: For the record, Joe Schmitt, Administrator,
Community Development and Environmental Services Division.
I asked the chairman if! could take five minutes -- I think, no
less and no more than about five minutes so the board planning
Page 47
,-
!
" .... fG... ""d n
, j4'"'" fin
I I!{,/f'
November 28,2007
commission can hear the guidance of the board.
Mr. Strain is in fact correct. lt was brought up yesterday during
discussion. In front of me here is resubmittal number seven. I received
it on Wednesday and it was distributed to the staff on Monday. And
this is in comments back from the applicant on our latest rejection.
I'm going to have a meeting on the afternoon of December 7th. The
entire staff involved in the review and anybody and everybody
involved in regards to the applicant, the public, anybody that wants to
come, we are going to review this thing in detail prior to your meeting
on the 13th. But let me play the --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Before you go--
MR. SCHMITT: I'll pause.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I was talking for a minute. But you said
something about reviewing it in detail and everybody is welcome to
come. What were you referring to?
MR. SCHMITT: I opened the meetings up. Certainly it's open to
the public. Anybody that wants to come and --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Which meeting?
MR. SCHMITT: This is -- I'm going to meet -- my staff is
meeting with representatives of the petitioner, the applicant for
Cocohatchee, their design team, anybody that's been involved in this
SDP process to go and review in detail every comment of staff.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But Joe, when?
MR. SCHMITT: This is December 7th. I'm reviewing that prior
to your meeting.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But then we have a problem. What you
just did is invited the planning commission. We can't show up there
without an advertisement. So are you going to be advertising the
December 7th meeting?
MR. SCHMITT: lt is not an advertised meeting. If the planning
commission wants to send somebody there as a representative. But it's
a meeting that -- I would have to ask the county attorney if you all
Page 48
1l A 4
November 28, 2007
come, certainly you wouldn't be able to participate, you just would
have to sit and listen, unless one member wanted to be appointed to sit
and participate in the review process.
But I opened it up to the applicant, I said you can invite anybody
you want, because we are going to devote the afternoon to review this
plan in detail so you could be prepared -- we can be prepared to
discuss this at your December 13th meeting.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But Joe, if you -- ifthe planning
commission attends, we have to -- that has to be a public notice
meeting if more than one of us attend. The information that's going to
be provided at that meeting is going to be relayed to us by staff
anyway.
MR. SCHMITT: That's correct.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So all we're going to do is fill the room
up, and you would have a room this big if you're inviting the public by
announcing it now at this meeting because you're going to have a lot
of people from North Naples who possibly want to be there.
I, under all conditions, want to avoid any problems with the Sunshine
rules in regards to this planning commission and this issue in
particular. lt is a litigation issue. And I'm sure that any mistake made
will be used in any manner it want's to be used in. And we don't want
to make any mistakes by attending that meeting and taking a chance of
a Sunshine Law violation.
So with that in mind, I'd like to ask this commission, does
anybody here intend to attend that meeting? But.
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Because I'd like a confirmation that none
of us will, including myself, we will not attend the meeting then, and
put any kind of idea forward that could cause us to have a cloud over
our 13th meeting.
So fine, you have a clean meeting on the 7th without us. We
expect that staff will give us a full report, and we'll have our own
Page 49
It.: )~
~J t; n ,
November 28, 2007
ability to analyze this stuff when it comes to us for the 13th anyway.
I think everybody here is good for their word. Everybody says that --
nobody's going to attend, right? Then that's the way it will be.
MR. KLATZKOW: Quite frankly, if two of you attend, either
one's leaving or the meeting's been canceled, so it's --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think we're going to get a full report
anyway. There's no need to get into that minutia at this time, so. I
appreciate that. Thank you.
And now we'll go forward, Joe.
(Video presentation begins.)
COMMISSIONER COYLE: -- input from the planning
commission on the Cocohatchee settlement. That the agreement that
we were negotiating at that point in time.
There continues to be a lot of confusion about what it is we want
to do, and I'm not at all sure that it's been properly implemented yet. lt
has been postponed at least once. And I'd like for us to give some
guidance so that we can get this moving along, otherwise it's just
going to linger for a lot longer period of time.
Basically this is my concern: When I read the settlement, it is
difficult for me to determine what the potential impact ofthe
settlement will be on our Land Development Code and its
interpretations and whether or not we're going to get back into a
situation like Cap D'Antibes. So I would like to get the planning
commission to take a look at this so they can tell us what those
provisions in that agreement are likely to do, both negative and
positive.
I am not interested in the planning commission telling me
whether I should have a settlement or not, that's not the planning
commission's job. The settlement issues are legal issues and they are
issues to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners. I
don't mind if they venture an opinion on it, but that's not my reason for
getting it to them.
Page 50
~
16th
,
JJj,
November 28, 2007
My reason for getting it to them is for them to look at what we
are saying in that settlement agreement and advising us whether or not
there are disadvantages to the county contained within that agreement.
And I'd just like to understand that.
So what I'd like to do is to get us to say to the planning
commission, look, schedule a workshop so that you can all get
together and talk and share your ideas about this in the public. And
then after that's happened, have the chairman come here to our
meeting where this will be discussed to provide a summary of the
consensus of the members of the planning commission. And that way
we get the benefit of their input.
They can also talk with any of us and all of us independently, and
I would encourage them to do that.
So basically that's where I was thinking we would go with this.
And I just -- I wanted to bring it up because it just seems to be
lingering and going on and on and on.
CHAIRMAN COLETTA: I like what you're saying, there's only
thing that troubles me a little bit is that we do put a lot on the planning
commission. I would think that their written opinion would be more
acceptable than having to have another person leave work to be able to
come in and explain it to us.
They might willingly do it, but I'm afraid we're going to get to
the point where we're going overburden a voluntary group --
COMMISSIONER COYLE: I understand. As long as we get
their input, whether it's in writing or in presentation. I just want --
they're good at their job, they know what they're doing, and they do it
more thoroughly than we do it. And I don't want to miss the
opportunity to let them review this agreement.
CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Okay, fellow commissioners, I agree
with it. How do you feel?
COMMISSIONER HALAS: I was going to chime in, that's why I
got my light on.
Page 51
'i (' t A ~
J r. -
"d ' Novem er 28, 2007
CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Good. Commissioner Henning, I don't
know if you came before Commissioner Halas or not, but --
COMMISSIONER HALAS: I was next.
CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Go ahead.
COMMISSIONER HALAS: Okay. Since this is in my district,
and of course all of us on this dais, we spent probably the better part of
two and a half hours discussing negotiations to move this thing
forward. At the time we assumed that we had a logical agreement, all
parties that were sitting here and going through the motions of
discussing what needed to be done and directed. lt was voted on.
Everybody concurred with it.
Then of course it came back and I believe at that point in time is
when Commissioner Coyle made the suggestion that this be moved on
to the planning commission.
And obviously we've run into a stalemate here. I believe that this
needs to go to the planning commission to be vented (sic) and, as
Commissioner Coyle brought up, is to make sure that the LDC as it
was written at the time this was approved along with the GMP, that
everything fits accordingly. I think that's where you're going with this
thing.
So I feel that -- and I think that the planning commission is
looking forward to looking at this issue. I know I've had a number of
calls from different people on the planning commission that would
like very much to look at this whole SOP, so -- I hope that we've got
support here so that this moves forward. And I believe there's already
a date established, and I believe it's been advertised or about to be
advertised, December the 12th, isn't it?
MR. MUDD: The 12th or 13th of December.
COMMISSIONER HALAS: So I would hope that we can move
in that direction.
CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Commissioner Henning.
COMMISSIONER HENNING: Well, you know, our staff could
Page 52
".1' , ,rq ,
ri ~~,f '
~ ?
November 28, 2007
evaluate and on seeing ifthere's any deviations from the Land
Development Code and the impacts of it.
COMMISSIONER COYLE: You want to really discuss that here
now? I would -- if! can respond?
COMMISSIONER HENNING: Yeah.
COMMISSIONER COYLE: I'll be quite honest with you, I don't
trust the staffs evaluation on these. lt was the staff that made the
decision on Cap D'Antibes.
Now, I'm not trying to be personally insulting, but I want
somebody who looks at the larger issues. Time and time again we
have had people come before us and tell us that there's a certain
interpretation that should be applied of our codes. And just recently I
saw one where there was a difference of opinion between the staff and
the county attorney's office. And the county attorney was good enough
to point out, no, that's wrong.
Now, we all do that, you know. None of us has a perfect
interpretation of these codes. And so I don't want to sound like I'm
being critical of staff, because I think the comprehensive planning
staff does a pretty dam good job, and they've been carrying a heavy
load. The problem is, I want the broadest possible interpretation, or
broadest possible review. That's all I'm saying.
CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Would you accept staffs
recommendations also in addition to the planning commission?
COMMISSIONER COYLE: Of course.
COMMISSIONER HENNING: I understand where you're
coming from, and I'm glad you clarified it's not demeaning to the staff,
because some of us up here don't like that. But I understand where
you're coming from now.
COMMISSIONER COYLE: Yeah. That's why I didn't want to
discuss it, because I didn't know how to say that without having it
interpreted as being critical of staff, and that's not my intent.
I just think that a lot of times we all focus on things that are
Page 53
16 , '~~/!m 4
November 28, 2007
specific to our job assignment, and we don't necessarily look at it from
a broader perspective. I do that. I think lots of other people too that,
too.
And so I just want the planning commission to have a shot at this.
They are very capable. They delve into these issues in details. I want
to know ifthere's any inconsistent language, anything confusing about
this that's likely to be misinterpreted.
I am right now somewhat confused about how the agreement and
the PUD document correlate and whether or not there are any possible
ways to interpret changes there. And I need to get that sorted out. And
I'd like to have the planning commission's help.
CHAIRMAN COLETTA: r think you have enough support to
have that happen.
Mr. Mudd understands. There's no questions? I think we're clear
enough.
Anything else, Commissioner Coyle?
COMMISSIONER COYLE: No, that's it for me. Did we resolve
that? I mean, is it okay?
MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. Okay.
COMMISSIONER HALAS: That's where we need to go.
(Video presentation ends.)
MR. SCHMITT: Again, that's the board's guidance. As far as the
conduct of the meeting, I do have -- you have your books, we're going
to provide you additional copies. I don't believe you want a complete
set of all these. We'll give you the pertinent documents that are related
to the plan review. There's three different SDPs here, some of it very
detailed. And I don't believe you want that.
rfyou want that, I'll certainly entertain any opportunity. I'd
prefer, if you can make an appointment or we just come down and
look at this, because these are fairly costly to reproduce. And if you
want to come down and we'll set up a time. Any time for you to sit
and review this with the staff is fine, if you want to look at the
Page 54
if} i A 4;~mber 28, 2007
complete set.
The specifics regarding the settlement agreement, that's the
settlement agreement as drafted by the county attorney, and then that
portion will be presented by the county attorney's office. By whom, I
do not know. But that settlement agreement is the county attorney's
document to the Board of County Commissioners.
So with that, any questions, and we'll -- that pretty much
concludes what I wanted to make sure you heard the board's guidance
in regards to what the board is looking for from you at that December
13th meeting.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Joe, who is the CDES staff liaison on
this issue with us? Who do we -- here's where I'm trying to go. I would
want that our meeting on the 13th to be extremely productive. I would
hope we wouldn't answer a lot of questions that are on the plans that
are questions that are irrelevant in regards to whether they can be
changed or not. Ifwe have questions that are questionable in regards
to why is this pipe here, why is that there, call staff up and ask that
question of them first rather than try to beat that to death at a public
meeting.
So I would like to know someone on staff who could be
responding to questions that hopefully the commissioners would ask
in regards to issues that may not need to come up in that kind of detail.
MR. SCHMITT: I have different planners assigned for each of
the three SDPs. So the person you would call -- there's three separate
-- there's the golf course and there's others. But I -- to make this
simple, I would prefer if you want to ask those questions, contact me
or Susan Istanes. Either one of us or would be Ross Gochenaur. He is
the chief back there responsible for plan review from that standpoint.
But one of us three, to contact us and we'll get you an answer.
And, again, if you want to set up a time to come and look at these
plans, or just let me know 15 minutes before you come, and we'll
make somebody's there and you can look at these plans in detail, if
Page 55
161
November 28, 2007
;"Jj
I~'
you so wish.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I know that these plans will be much
more detailed than what this board normally receives.
MR. SCHMITT: That's correct.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I would just not want us to have to go
through a lesson in blueprint reading at our planning commission
meeting on the 13th. I would rather that lesson be accomplished
privately by each member with the staff people, if they see they need
to do that.
I certainly don't see that need myself. I've reviewed all these
blueprints in detail.
It's more a matter of interpretation of the settlement agreement
language versus the PUD language and how that reflects in the
blueprints. And you really don't need to get into some of the fine print
of those blueprints to get to that point, so.
Mr. Kolflat.
COMMISSIONER KOLFLAT: In reference -- Commissioner
Coyle made reference to Cap D'Antibes. I'm not familiar with that
issue. Can you summarize how that relates to this subject?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Where is that, anyway?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: You talking about a writ of
certiorari?
MR. SCHMITT: Commissioner, I think it's best -- that's a long
story. I could get with you off-line and discuss the whole background
of it. lt's an issue from several years ago, almost five years ago or
longer.
lt had to do with a high-rise development in Pelican Bay. The last
development -- it's the Water Park Place. lt's the last developable
property in Pelican Bay.
COMMISSIONER KOLFLAT: The only reason I bring it up, he
mentioned it in his directive, and I want to be sure that I understood
what the direction meant.
Page 56
.....
,
'l" -?' I
r:lk.
~,..., \-,,1 .
J' 4,
November 28, 2007
MR. SCHMITT: I'll get with you on that, if you wouldn't mind.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah, it's -- would be an interesting
story .
Mr. Adelstein, Mr. Murray and Mr. Vigliotti.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Basically, this place is going
to be held as -- by of the Supreme Court of State of Florida under a
Certiorari. Now, in that particular issue, certain things have to be
done. And what I've read is the history of this. But the Certiorari itself
can go on for another year or two years. We don't want to do that, we
want to get rid of it.
So the answer is to find out exactly what is the key that's going to
hold it, because they will keep it open.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein, this is a Bert Harris claim
that was filed. Under the statutes, a Bert Harris claim has to go
through a settlement discussion that can take a certain amount of time.
That's all this is.
The county commission offered a settlement. The applicant
countered the settlement. The commission said, you know, let's have
the planning commission look at the settlement agreement.
All we're looking at is the language of the settlement agreement,
nothing else. The rest of the legal issues are way beyond this board's
ability to be involved with.
So the documents you get will be the proposed settlement
agreement. Our objective is to read it, see where it's inconsistent with
the PUD and the Land Development Code or where the terms in that
agreement could have different impacts than that were intended in the
other documents. And that's all we're supposed to be doing.
Mr. Murray?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I'm going to pass.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: We're getting our packages sent
to us today, I believe?
Page 57
161A 4
November 28, 2007
MR. SCHMITT: You have your books from the August meeting,
which contain most everything you need that had the PUD. Then we
sent a supplemental package in preparation for the meeting three
weeks ago. I believe you got the updated version of the settlement
agreement with that packet.
We just had got this resubmittal. We'll go through and --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It wasn't three weeks ago. I have my
packet that you provided, but it was provided to us but it was much
more than three weeks, it was more like two months ago, when this
first got remanded to us and it got canceled.
So a lot of the members here may have misplaced their
document.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: One packet or two?
MR. SCHMITT: You have original -- a notebook, a large
notebook that was from the August meeting. Then when it was
rescheduled again, part of that we sent out a supplemental packet that
included the revised settlement agreement.
You did not get that?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: No.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That may be the one, I'm not sure -- I
know everything you gave us, I have kept in a file box, and I have all
mine, but I don't remember the second packet.
MR. SCHMITT: We may still be holding that, but I thought the
zoning staff sent that out. I'll check with Ray Bellows. When I get
back this afternoon, we'll check. And we're going to get -- we'll make
-- because there's a supplemental packet.
There's a revised settlement agreement that is different than what
you were given in August. The August one was much more detailed.
This is now the revised one that was prepared by Mr. Pettit before he
left employment with the county. And that was the final version.
Jeff, I'm thinking Labor Day, around that time frame?
MR. KLATZKOW: Yeah.
Page 58
".. ,':',
;, ;/.
o!!"";
"..Il.. ",.,.--"
~i
f~ (C,
'-'?!,
November 28, 2007
MR. SCHMITT: And then we have additional drawings that we
were going to provide to you. One of the things we still need to get to
you are the elevations. But we did the site plans that showed the
building separations, the setbacks from the various points of
measurement for the property. Those are the documents -- I thought
that we sent those out to you already. I'll make sure we get back today
and they'll be sent to you so you can get prepared for that meeting.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think even -- since it's been 90 days,
that would be helpful to do it again.
Mr. Vigliotti?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Just so I'm clear, we're
supposed to have a notebook revised from August, and you're going to
send us --
MR. SCHMITT: I see the look on your face that nobody got that
packet. So we may still have that or we held onto it when you
continued the other meeting.
But just for the record, just so you understand, we'll prepare
another packet with the revisions that will go out to each one of you
that will have -- I guess what I would call the documents that you need
-- the pertinent documents that you may need in regards to the site
plan and site layout and some of the things that you are going to deal
with specifically with the settlement agreement, and make sure you
have the revised settlement agreement as well.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: And what are we getting today?
MR. SCHMITT: Nothing today. I'm just showing you today, this
is the resubmittal packet. I would doubt you want to go through this
entire packet. It's very detailed. As Mr. Strain mentioned, everything
from --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, your utility--
MR. SCHMITT: -- water management to landscaping to all sorts
of aspects of the site plan process. All you really need is the layout
and the elevations.
Page 59
16' A if
November 28, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Those plan contain like your manhole
cuts, your pipe cuts, your embedments for your gravel underneath
your water lines. We don't need all that. That's a requirement of the
SDP.
But Joe, I think that the site plan-related information is the most
critical. You have buffering information because buffering is an issue
as well that's both in the PUD. And I think with any buffer plans, and
most critical to show how the interpretation of the settlement
agreement occurs is the elevation drawings which you haven't got yet
but which we'll need.
So if we have those along with the settlement agreement and a
copy of the most recent PUD with any amendments, we're off and
runnmg.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I do have --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer, then Mr. Murray.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And Joe, any reference drawn,
please make them to full scale, not reduced, okay. In other words, if
it's a 24 by 36 original, send us that.
MR. SCHMITT: Okay.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yeah, this is more for Mr.
Klatzkow.
I remember Marjorie telling us that the settlement agreement
essentially subordinates the PUD. And I'm trying to understand when I
look at this, should I take that into consideration or consider them
separately and then resolve the issue.
MR. KLATZKOW: I think the board gave the planning
commission some very specific direction. The board wants you to look
at --
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Everything.
MR. KLATZKOW: -- everything. And to comment on
everything. And --
Page 60
'f ( A 4
November 28, 2007
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay, and that's what I will
attempt to do. But it was haunting me that somehow this subordinates.
So the issues that would be raised up in the PUD --
MR. KLATZKOW: This has more issues than an onion, quite
frankly, this settlement at this point in time.
But I think your direction is very clear, and I think it would be
very helpful for the board to get that report.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I agree.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: One of the things that the settlement
agreement does, it has language that explains what the PUD already
explains. The problem is the way it's explained in the settlement
agreement is different than the way the definitions are occasionally in
the PUD.
Those differences are what we have to understand how they will
work on these plans and then tell the commission how that may differ
from what the PUD intended.
I'll give you an example. Measured setbacks. They're referring to
habitable space. Well, you know, we don't refer to habitable space in
the LDC. We refer to different points, surfaces of the buildings' walls.
Well, if you measure from habitable space, that may have a different
outcome than the measurement, if you were, to wall surfaces.
Those are the kind of things when you read the settlement, and
I've read it at least five times. If you read that agreement and then see
how it fits to the PUD and the Land Development Code, you may find
the language is not always identical.
Ifit isn't, the BCC seems to want to know what does that mean,
what are we getting then if we improve the settlement agreement and
it changes those definitions? And if we feel it is an impact, we need to
tell them that.
And I think that's where we need to be going on the 13th.
Mr. Klatzkow, ifthere's anything--
MR. KLA TZKOW: No, I think that's right.
Page 61
1~~--"ln<
-'. "'''' i U
November 28, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good, then we will look forward to the
13th on that one.
I had asked -- we just got over a break -- and I had asked --
Cherie? I keep forgetting to slow down. I am sorry. I will try again.
Ifhe could have someone tell us when we have to be out of here.
Now, I just got -- someone checked with Mary Joe downstairs,
and she said we're scheduled in here till 11 :30. That wasn't the answer
that I was looking for. The answer I was looking for is when does
facilities management need to get in here. Because if they're going to
take a lunch break like everybody else, we could work through lunch
and get an extra hour in and be out of this and still have a late lunch
for us, and they get in here on time.
Is there any way by 11 :00 or 11 :30 we could find that answer
out?
MR. SCHMITT: I'll check.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you.
With that, Catherine, we're back on to the Land Development Code --
MS. FABACHER: Okay, we're going to go to Page 47, and this
is going to be amendment to prohibited signs. Let's see, that's on Page
47. And Michelle Arnold's here to explain if you have any questions.
I'd just like to say that on Page 48, there is a corrected reference
on number E there, rotating signs or displays, except barber pole signs,
complying with Section 5.06.04.C, cross out 12, add 13.B.
And then on Page 50, under Subsection X, we added an
exemption, or an exclusion for county transit vehicles, government
vehicles providing information. That's an exemption from the
prohibition against mounting signs on truck beds and other vehicles.
Michelle Arnold's here, if you have any questions.
MS. ARNOLD: For the record, Michelle Arnold.
I did want to point out an additional corrective on Page 48,
Paragraph C, same reference, just correcting them both.
MS. F ABACHER: Thank you.
Page 62
16' '
n
.. I~
[:~Jl:J
"
"
November 28,2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead. Any questions of -- Mr.
Schiffer, then Mr. Vigliotti.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Michelle, on X, when you say
county transit vehicle, is this where we're going to start putting
billboards on the sides of buses and stuff?
MS. ARNOLD: No. What kind of brought us to this amendment
was we do have a code case where there is billboards on trucks driving
through the community. And when we were reviewing the ordinance,
the LDC, it was brought up that we need to take into account that our
county transit buses do have small signs for informational items for
the public so they know which bus to get on. And those are removable
sIgns.
So we're just including this exemption in there to recognize the
county's bus system and the signage that is on there for informational
purposes.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But the way this is worded, how
do we know that it wouldn't allow an advertisement on the side of a
county transit vehicle?
I mean, the thing I fear is, so many buses where they put a screen
on the side of it, you look through it, and then you have a --
MS. ARNOLD: Because it says providing information, not
advertising.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Distract attention for the
purposes of advertising, da, da, da, da, da -- excluding. So you're sure
that that could never happen?
MS. ARNOLD: This section is for prohibiting signage on
vehicles. And the verbiage that we're adding is to exclude county
vehicle -- transit vehicles for governmental vehicles providing
information.
So this is being included in the prohibition section, but we're
excluding the prohibition from government transit vehicles providing
information.
Page 63
161
1'1 W
,~ lj.
November 28, 2007
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But doesn't that then mean they
can do it. In other words, and I'm paraphrasing, and that may be a
mistake, but it's -- you're not allowed to provide, for the purpose of
advertising a business, products, service, et cetera et cetera --
excluding. And then in the exclusion is a county transit.
So essentially could a county I transit be able to have advertising
on the side of it?
MS. ARNOLD: Maybe what we can do is take that comma out of
there. And --
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So you'd say county transit
vehicles or government vehicles providing information.
MS. ARNOLD: Right.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. I'm not against
advertising, but I think Collier County is not a place where you want a
lO-foot head sitting next to you in traffic looking at you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti, then Ms. Caron.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Michelle, why are you writing
this, because you want to disallow the vehicles running around
advertising now but yet let the county do it; is that where you're
going?
MS. ARNOLD: No, we already have a prohibition, in our
opinion, in the code against vehicles with moveable signs driving
around the county.
This request is to recognize that the county has a bus system
now, because this code was written prior to the county's bus system,
and on that bus system there are moveable signage, but it's smaller and
it's only providing information to the traveling public that is utilizing
that system.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Okay, because I'm concerned,
as Brad is, to wind up with advertising. I don't want the county to do
advertising.
MS. ARNOLD: That's not the intent at all.
Page 64
r1~V A
t.1'1 \
'Ik, ' 4
hi . ,
db ~~',
November 28,2007
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Now could we tighten it up?
Providing public information, instead of just providing information?
Public service information?
MS. ARNOLD: I guess I'll look to Jeff to see whether or not he
feels that if we change it to county transit vehicles and governmental
vehicles providing information --
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'm just trying to tighten it up.
MS. ARNOLD: -- do you think that tightens it up or --
MR. KLATZKOW: I'd have an issue the way it is. I don't have
an issue with what you're suggesting, policy decision.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I just want to be reassured that
it's not interpreted so they can do some advertising. So if it's
information, it will be directional or public service information.
MR. KLATZKOW: The way this is written, we could do
advertising.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So Mr. Vigliotti's suggestion then would
tighten it up.
MR. KLATZKOW: Yes.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Public service information.
MR. KLATZKOW: Which could also be a form of advertising, if
you like. Collier County wants you to recycle every day, whatever,
you know -- if you're okay with that.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Okay, no, let me go backwards
then.
Michelle, you're saying directional signs, like for instance we're
going to a current destination?
MS. ARNOLD: Yes, that's what's on the current bus system.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: And that's what you need?
MS. ARNOLD: I just don't want to get into a situation -- I'm just
looking for the benefit of the county. I don't want to get into a
situation where they're looking at -- they're pointing to the signage that
says on the CAT system Golden Gate Boulevard and, you know,
Page 65
:11
~6f-':' r
November 28, 2007
someone conflicting that with advertising, because that's not the intent
of it.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Instead of providing
information or public service information, providing directional
information, will that work for you?
MR. KLATZKOW: You could say -- if you want to just limit this
to county transit vehicles -- if what you're getting at, Michelle, is the
CAT buses --
MS. ARNOLD: Right, that's all it is.
MR. KLATZKOW: Then eliminate government vehicles
providing information, okay. And then for your county transit
vehicles, include language directional or route information.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'm okay with that.
MR. KLATZKOW: I think that gets to your concern, sir.
COMMISSIONER MURRA Y: I have a question.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: After Ms. Caron. Ms. Caron, then Mr.
Murray.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Hey, what about me.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm sorry, Mr. Schiffer after Mr. Murray.
COMMISSIONER CARON: I was happy with adding county
transit vehicles or government vehicles providing public service
information. I think that gets everybody to where they need to be. I
think that's pretty simple.
MS. ARNOLD: The language I have now, based on what Mr.
Klatzkow indicated, has county transit vehicles providing directional
and route information.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Mr. Murray, then Mr. Schiffer.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay, well, I'm going to--
sometimes the county will take one ofthe -- I think it's probably, I
don't know, facilities management has these signs, sometimes the
police have them where they can check speeds and they can put it up
and they can make it provide information about Town Hall meeting or
Page 66
16 I ~\ ,
November 28, 2007
whatever.
MS. ARNOLD: Right, that would not be mounted on a vehicle,
that's stationary in the roadway.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: It is mounted on a vehicle. It's a
trailer.
MS. ARNOLD: But when it's being utilized, it's stationary and
not moving through the community. Those speed signs, to get there
they'll mount it to locate it to whatever street location for the signage.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay, so this is clearly intending
to -- okay.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Michelle, there's a trolly that
runs around with tourists, is that thing in compliance?
MS. ARNOLD: The trolly?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: It's a vehicle that has
advertising.
MS. ARNOLD: These are considered -- we're talking about
moving signs. And the trolly I don't believe has moving signs on it. It
has just stationary signage.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But this is signs mounted on a
vehicle, you got it right there, be it on the roof, hood, trunk and so on,
that are intended to attract or distract the attention of motorists.
MS. ARNOLD: Well, a trolly when it's driving in Collier County
would be not in compliance with this.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So that's not fair.
MS. ARNOLD: Well, we're not addressing the trolly or -- we're
not changing the language that it's currently in place. We are
addressing just county transit facilities.
And if you want to modify it to allow the trolly and not the CAT
system or some other business, then that's something that you guys
would need to determine.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The question is how would you
Page 67
16 , !~
."';1
.......~=
November 28, 2007
grandfather in a vehicle? Because ifthey bought a new vehicle --
essentially we know, and that trolly does operate outside the City of
Naples. I mean, we don't want that thing pulled over. I mean, that's --
so essentially this would cause that trolly to be not in compliance.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Michelle, you had said something in
response to Mr. Schiffer the first time which I thought covered it, but
-- and he's right, I didn't see it in here. You're talking about motion
signs on vehicles.
And if that is the intent of X, maybe if we clarify that, that solves
the problem.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't know. If the intent from your
comment was that this was signs that, you know, that -- I've seen that
truck when it came through Collier County, and it was an absolutely
eyesore. Anybody advertised -- I was shocked by seeing this thing,
and it was certainly a distraction that would only lead, I think, to more
accidents and more people being distracted on the road.
I'm glad we're putting a stop to it. But I'm wondering by your
comment, though, how this helps. Because your first -- by your
comment it was motion signs, but if this doesn't read that way, maybe
we're not getting where we need to be.
Mr. Murray.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I just recalled that one day I was
driving from way up north on 41, driving down, and I was surprised
on the right-hand side there was a moveable sign such as on those
vehicles, but it was stationary.
And I was just wondering what -- I know that's outside ofthe
scope of this at the moment, but I think it bears talking to and relating
to, because it represents a distraction, and I don't know whether you
want to embrace going further with this for that.
And it was, I think, an organization like Moose or Elks or
something of that nature, and I can't remember the organization. But I
Page 68
Iff, A
f, .
1ftl 4
.~. .'" November 28, 2007
was very surprised to see it. And you might want to have somebody
go look. I believe it was stationary, there was no trailer or anything
with it, it was a structure.
So if you're getting at that effort, I would think you might want to
take a look at that. Just a thought.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think, Michelle, with the input you've
got from us, maybe you could take a second look at this language and
make sure it's really addressing what it is that we're supposed to be
here.
MS. ARNOLD: I think the language as it's been modified today
would be all inclusive to whether or not the county's transit system has
a stationary sign or a moving sign. So --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I agree with you, but aren't you trying to
get rid of motion signs on those vehicles and --
MS. ARNOLD: Well, no, the intent of this amendment is not to
address the motion signs. I guess I wasn't real clear.
When we were going through that particular case, we were doing
a full review of our sign code. And it was brought up that, you know,
we don't really have anything in our sign code for the transit system.
And so we're just simply trying to have that inclusion in there.
We're not trying to modify or clean up our ordinance to address
motion signs at all, because we already have a pending lawsuit and we
don't want to give the impression that that's the reason why we're
doing that.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Gotcha. And I understand now. So the
review of the code for one reason sparked the concern over the other --
MS. ARNOLD: Exactly.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- and the other simply was to have
county transit vehicles legal for providing directional routing
information.
MS. ARNOLD: Absolutely.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So we focus on just that issue, we
Page 69
A
November 28, 2007
could pass this form of the LDC, and any other questions we can bring
up at some other future date. Does that work for everybody?
So the language suggested to be changed is simply to be county
transit vehicles providing directional or routing information. And then
we'd strike the words government vehicles providing information.
MS. ARNOLD: Right.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: With that, I think we have an acceptable
language situation here in this amendment?
Is there a motion that we recommend approval of 5.06.06,
Prohibited Signs?
COMMISSIONER CARON: So moved.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: So moved.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made by Commissioner Caron,
seconded by Commissioner Midney. Any further discussion?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor, signify by saying aye.
COMMISSIONER KOLFLA T: Aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Anybody opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Mark, can I ask Michelle a
question?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Of course.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Michelle, so that means that the
trolly, I guess, really has always been out of compliance, then; is that
Page 70
lrl A 4
November 28, 2007
right?
MS. ARNOLD: Yes, Brad, you're making it an issue.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: All right. Thanks.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I was afraid of that. That's why I was
trying to get past it, Michelle.
MS. FABACHER: Commissioners, we have one more short one
for Michelle to discuss, on Page 137, and that is going to be in Page
137 of your book, and it's Section 5.03.02, Fences and Walls.
And basically we had noted that the old coded had required a
building permit for fences and walls, and it was omitted -- that
provision was omitted during recodification. And staffs requesting it
be returned.
Page 137.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, any questions on page -- starts on
page 137 and goes through page 139. Basically, the item number ten is
what the whole issue is about. Nine has a little bit of language added.
Any questions or concerns? Mr. Schiffer?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The building code always has
and always will require a permit, so why is this necessary?
MS. ARNOLD: I think because there's language currently in our
Land Development Code that confuses the issue about whether or not
a permit is required for a fence. And we're just wanting to put it back
in so that there's clarification that yes, you need a permit for a fence.
It's a building code -- it's more just for simplification purposes. It was
there before, it wasn't hurting anything before it was omitted. I think it
just created more confusion with the omission out of the LDC than
simplifying it for the public.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So somebody actually came
forth and said oh, I don't need a permit for my fence? Because the
Land Development Code is silent on it.
MR. KLATZKOW: I think this could become an issue in a code
enforcement case, where somebody would get brought into because
Page 71
1~61~
November 28, 2007
they failed to get a permit for a fence and the LDC is a little bit hazy
on this. So that would just end this issue.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It doesn't hurt to duplicate in this
particular case.
Go ahead, Mr. Murray.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: However, I remember Mr. White
making the point that the purpose for recodification was to eliminate
redundancies and other things. So it's a balancing act, isn't it, it really
IS.
MR. KLATZKOW: We eliminated a lot more than redundancies,
unfortunately.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think the redundancy that he was
looking to eliminate was within the LDC itself --
MS. ARNOLD: Within the LDC.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. And this is not a redundancy in
the LDC, this is a clarification to the LDC that fixes the redundancy of
the fact that we have to have it now reviewed by the LDC as well as
the building code.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yes, I agree. But I was also
aware that he was talking about taking things out of the LDC that were
properly in the building code. So that's what I was making reference
to.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, anyway. Are we -- anybody else
have any comments on pages 137 through Page 139?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'd like to make a motion.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti, go ahead.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'd like to make a motion for
approval with the changes we just discussed.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Second.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That is for LDC Section 5.03.02.A?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Correct.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Motion's been made by Mr.
Page 72
16,
r,
4
November 28,2007
Vigliotti, seconded by Ms. Caron.
Any further discussion?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor, signify by saying aye.
COMMISSIONER KOLFLA T: Aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Anybody opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you.
MS. ARNOLD: Thank you, Commissioner.
MS. FABACHER: Commissioners, our next -- I know we had
given out a tentative agenda, but we've swapped around again a little
bit because Nick could join us. And we'd like to go next to street
system requirements. That would be on Page 53 in your book. And it's
going to deal with Section 6.06.01 and Section 10.02.13.
And just to give you some background, at your request when we
revised the PUD document we asked everyone to take out all the
redundant language. Well, transportation had some issues with their
comments, because they were not included in the LDC. So this is an
attempt by the transportation department to comply with your
direction to put more or less their boilerplate language into the LDC so
it doesn't need to be repeated.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Finally.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: For the record, Nick Casalanguida. I
want to give credit to -- John Podczerwinsky's worked really hard on
this. He's on the development review staff in the back. There you go.
Page 73
16 'No~emb~ 28,2007
As you go through it, the only thing that's really different that
you've asked us to include is on Page 44, number three. Commissioner
Strain, you repeatedly said why are sites under construction and don't
have the appropriate turn lanes in there. So we've added that language
that we've been sticking into the PUDs currently to date.
The rest of the language is pretty much consistent what's in our
standard boilerplate PUD language.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I was pleased to see this. It wraps up or
cleans up -- Ray Bellows has been for a long time attempting to clean
up the PUD process, and this was one lingering problem. So this
works out real well.
Anybody have any questions, comments? Starts on Page 53 and
goes through Page 57.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I have one.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead, Mr. Schiffer.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: On Page 55, it's H.3. What
exactly does that mean? Or let me tell you what I think it means, tell
me if I'm right or wrong. If somebody has to put a turn lane, if that
turn lane is being built on land within the county right-of-way, that
that person would have to pay the county for that land.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: They would reimburse the county
through providing right-of-way adjacent to that turn lane.
In other words, you have a utility line or, you know -- what
happens often is you put in a turn lane and you're now reducing the
ability for the county to provide either a sidewalk or utilities. So you
have to provide compensating right-of-way for that turn lane. And
that's been standard PUD language since I've been here.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: My question isn't expanding the
right-of-way. That I fully understand. It's that this is talking about
within the right-of-way.
So are you essentially paying them to build that portion of a turn
lane within the right-of-way?
Page 74
16~
November 28, 2007
,',,'
l,iJl
L,.,..~
U
MR. CASALANGUIDA: No, sir. What they're doing -- if they
have to put in a turn lane in the county-owned right-of-way that we've
acquired or has been dedicated prior, they have to provide
compensating right-of-way for that turn lane.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'm not sure it really says that,
though.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: If any required turn lane improvements
requires the use of existing county rights-of-way or easements, then
compensating right-of-way shall be provided at no cost to Collier
County as a consequence of such improvement upon final approval of
the turn lane design during the first subsequent development order.
That's standard PUD language that we've used.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. All right. So if you're
going to use up 10 feet for a turn lane, you've got to add 10 feet.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: You've got to, in your property,
dedicate 10 feet back to Collier County.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: All right. Thanks.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: A master plan is created,
eventually a development order is issued.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: Yes, sir.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: On Page 54, number two, where
it says access points shown on a PUD master plan are considered to be
conceptual. My note is until when?
Is it pertinent there to have a clarification, or it's understood?
MR. CASALANGUIDA: It's understood. The PUD master plan,
we don't like to have too much specificity. It's always the Catch-22.
You'd like to see a site plan at that time, and it's hard for staff to
review a site plan at the same time there've reviewing the PUD,
because things change.
So just to say to the applicant you can show the arrows on your
PUD master plan and when you go to do your actual site plan we'll
Page 75
',1
~
I' fl
I......,..,
161
November 28, 2007
adjust that based on what you're putting on the site. Different projects
may require different site access requirements. But you're not going to
get any more access points unless you amend the PUD.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay. Good, thanks.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any other questions about the
transportation issues?
Mr. Vigliotti.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'd like to make a motion, if
there's no other questions.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any speakers of the public?
MS. FABACHER: No, sir.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, go ahead.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'd like to make a motion to
approve with all the changes here.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I'll second the motion.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Now, the motion you're making is to
approve the changes in Section 6.06.01, Street System Requirements
and 10.02.13, Planned Unit Development Procedures. Is that right?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: As on Page 53, correct.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And the second?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Second.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Caron was the second, Mr. Vigliotti
was the motion maker.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I was.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, Mr. Adelstein, ifit matters, then
you can be -- it's irrelevant. Everybody would be willing to second it,
so let's just leave it like that.
Okay. Any further discussion?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All those in favor, signify by saying aye.
COMMISSIONER KOLFLA T: Aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
Page 76
161 A 4
November 28, 2007
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Anybody opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries. Thank you.
Just in case we're not going to get another chance to take a break
or we go longer, we'll take a 10-minute break now for the court
reporter. And then when Joe gets back maybe we'll be able to find out
when we can officially stop.
(A break was taken.)
(Commissioner Kolflat is absent from the boardroom.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, we're back from our break and
during that amount of time Mr. Schmitt found out we can stay here till
1 :00 today, so we will continue.
If the planning commission so agrees, we'll break at 1 :00 and that
will be -- we'll just go right through lunch and stop at 1 :00. Is that
okay with everybody else?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: No.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I'll be leaving earlier.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, that still leaves us a
quorum, so we will still continue.
Okay, Ms. Fabacher, let's go on.
MS. FABACHER: Okay, Commissioners, thank you. We're
going to move next to interim watershed management regulations.
That's on page 7 in your book. And that is going to be a list of section
numbers. These would be amending Section 3.07.00. It's on -- I'm
sorry, it's on Page 17 in your book. Forgive me, Page 17 in your book.
Page 77
16 Jo~mb~ 28, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: By the way, you're going in and out on
your mIC.
MS. FABACHER: Okay. All right. This will include Section
3.07.00, Section 6.05.01, Section 10.02.02, Section 10.02.03, Section
10.02.04. And thank you for your correction, it is on Page 17 in your
book.
And Mr. Wiley is here to answer any questions that you might
have.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, Mr. Wiley, welcome.
MR. WILEY : Yes, sir.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: How are you?
MR. WILEY: I'm doing fine, sir.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any questions? This starts on
Page 17 and we go all the way, looks like it's a long one. But a lot of it
is existing language.
MR. WILEY: Correct. What you'll notice, this is Robert Wiley
for the record, with the Engineering Services Department.
You'll notice that at the very front is the addition of the new
language under 3.07.01.02. That's the new language.
The rest of the stuff, basically you go all the way to the very ends
of each of the sections, you'll see just a reference to go back to 3.07 in
the different areas of development applications that would come in.
There's a lot of paperwork, but most of it is just a copy.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Since most of the language is on
Page 18, do we have any questions from the -- this particular
document from the planning commission?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I do, Mark, one small one.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, and we also have more continuing
language on 20.
Go ahead, Brad.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: On 18.C at the bottom of the
page, the intent there is it's only within those zones that you are to
Page 78
"I' 6' i~ 4
11 ' [(~(\ 'of' ~,
db ' l'
November 28, 2007
provide this; is that right?
MR. WILEY: No, sir. No, sir. In C, what we're saying is when
you are within these three flood zones A, AE and VE, you have to
evaluate it. We're not saying you have to provide it. And the
difference being that there are some coastal properties that there's no
way we would have any reason to claim a benefit by trying to keep
out the Gulf of Mexico.
But we want the evaluation, because some of those zones are also
from freshwater inland flooding which is trying to come towards the
coastline. So that's why we're simply saying they would do the
eval uation.
Now, there is the stipulation that says they should also be
evaluated for areas known to be periodically inundated by intense
rainfall or sheet flow conditions. And those would be areas that may
or may not be in an A, AE or VE zone. They could be other areas
throughout the county.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So obviously the intent is not to
maintain storm surge, although that would be nice for the county if
they could.
But I'm still-- so where does this not apply then? For example, if
you're in an X zone, what do you do?
MR. WILEY: In an X zone, if it happens to be an area that we
know has a flooding problem -- remember, our X zone is strictly
limited from coastal surge flooding. There is no current flood map
produced by FEMA which identifies rainfall induced flooding.
Some of our known areas of flooding problems, street and yard
flooding, are in the X zone portion of the county. So we're saying if
we know these areas are out there, we also want those to be evaluated
for floodplain storage compensation.
It happens to be because the way our floodplain map is
delineated by FEMA. Now, as you know, we're in the process of
producing a new flood map which will address rainfall flooding, but
Page 79
161 A 4
November 28, 2007
we're not there yet.
And if you want, I can show you a map, just to give you an
indication of what we're talking about. Let's look at your visualizer
now.
What we did was we took the map that we currently have
available, we called it our bubble map. Those little circled bubble-type
type of red circles, those are areas that we know have a problem with a
lot of street and yard flooding, sometimes even house flooding.
Then we also took an evaluation off the GIS to just identify
where are the areas which have, on the GIS evaluation, a hydroperiod
of two months or greater to show you the big flowways. These are the
types of areas that we are talking about.
As you'll notice, there's a lot of the county that would not be
here. But this just gives an indication to you. Again, this map doesn't
show you the A, the AE and the VE zones, because that's another
layer we could have added but it sort of cluttered the map up. We're
trying to show you other places that we would be wanting the
evaluation to take place. And then it's up to staff and the applicant to
come to an agreement on whether an evaluation is provided or not
provided.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Where is that map available to
the public?
MR. WILEY: Well, I got it yesterday. So that's how draft this
thing is. Weare not really set on adopting this map. This was just sent
up here for an example for you to see.
But this is in our county GIS system. We can make it readily
available for anybody who wanted to look at.
This would be the type of mapping, once we really narrow it
down, define the areas to make sure that we're satisfied with
particularly the green areas that are identified as wetlands on here,
meaning they have a hydroperiod of two months or greater, you'll see
those are your flowways. This map could be made available. It's no
Page 80
.:fII!< '"
r'f., , b)~. ~':1
K~, ,~) f .,,, t "-,
November 28, 2007
problem. I would be on the GIS layer system.
But this is just to give an indication since we have had the
question asked us by other people, well, is my property in or out of it.
This is the type of consideration we would wanting to work as a tool
to help everyone understand why we would consider the evaluation
necessary .
And of course this being in GIS you can superimpose over
property lines, it's easy to work with at that point.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Question. Based upon the -- I'm
sorry. Based upon our ability of sight conditions, some projects may
incur substantial fiscal impacts. Could you explain that and maybe
give me an example from the beginning.
MR. WILEY: The fiscal impact that we're talking about here
deals with a situation, a property -- for instance, look at this map here
-- happens to be in an area which is identified as a flowway. And the
property comes in and it is required to set back a certain portion of the
property just to allow the water to continue to store on that property.
They could not develop it.
It's called an importer property. You import more water onto
your property than you actually create from the rainfall. That can have
a significant impact. That can affect sometimes 20,25 percent of your
property's buildability under the scenario that if you do not have a
current condition that's being evaluated and you're anticipating just
going in and filling the whole property.
And we've had that particular situation arise already. And we
addressed it through the South Florida Water Management District
permitting criteria that we use for regulating it by anyway.
But that's where we say it can have some significant impacts to certain
properties which are entirely within flowways or depressional storage
areas. It would affect their ability to just construct under normal fill
and build type situation.
Page 81
16 I A ,i~
November28, 2007
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Is this only for new projects
going forward?
MR. WILEY: This would be for new development and for
redevelopment. And in the case of redevelopment, it's probably not
near as applicable, this particular scenario would not be.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: So it doesn't or does not apply
to?
MR. WILEY: It would apply for redevelopment, yes, sir, as well
as new development.
But we're not saying that you would have an existing
development where nothing is transpiring, they would not have to all
want to be found in default and have to provide it. But it's if they come
in for any kind of development application, we would evaluate it.
The situation that we're looking at is if we know we have a
problem, let's don't make it worse in the redevelopment issue. If you
have a development which is low, it's already flooding, you want to
come back in, redevelop it, just fill everything up, well, if you're
already bringing water off site onto the property, make sure that
evaluation takes that into account, because you don't want to pass that
property (sic) onto another neighboring property.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other questions?
Mr. Wiley, on Page 18 you're talking about increasing the
treatment area to 150 percent, that it goes from one to one-and-a-half
inches. It's volumetric, I assume, so that would be done by depth?
MR. WILEY: Depth and/or area, depending upon the vertical
distance you had in your system design.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So by doing this, you're creating more
holding water, but you're going to require more clearing.
MR. WILEY: More -- by clearing, you mean removing
vegetation?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, you can't have this area used--
you can't utilize the preserve or native habitat areas for your water
Page 82
, / r,' A" ,4'
"t ,I
November 28, 2007
retention, so you're going to have to increase your water retention
area. And if you do it by excavation to get the volume area you're
required, would that increase the clearing needs for a project?
MR. WILEY: Potentially it could, yes, sir.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Under C, where you have the word
evaluated, the GMP is our conceptual document in which we state that
we have to perform certain ways, and the LDC is the implementation
document. And I'm wondering where the word evaluated is -- how is
that? Who knows what the -- I just come to you and say I've evaluated
this and it's okay, or what's the evaluation criteria?
MR. WILEY: There's a process that you go through, the
engineering community knows about it. Where already doing it
through the water management district regulations to where you're
making a determination of the amount of water that is stored on your
property predevelopment. And if that amount of water is more than
what your development creates by simple rainfall coming on it, you're
considered an importer.
If you're within an area that goes through an inundation state,
you're either an importer or an exporter.
So the criteria is already out there through the district. That's the
evaluation we're talking about, so that you're showing that the
floodplain storage is not being diminished by the development on the
property .
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I don't think the word evaluation
is a good word to have, because it's ambiguous. It may mean
something to you, but I bet you with just that word, I could argue it
would means something different to me and probably be on the same
ground you're on.
So I'm wondering if you have a way of putting in here a more
precise reference than the word evaluated to what you just tried to say.
Is it like an ERP process with South Florida? Is there wetland
juris -- is there some process that you go through that -- you just said
Page 83
;J
16 Ii:'
~r:,
r
November 28, 2007
the engineering knows this.
So what is it that they know, what is it called? When you ask an
engineer to do this work, what would you specifically say as a type of
evaluation you're asking for?
MR. WILEY: It's simply floodplain storage compensation
calculation. But I put the word evaluation in here because we also,
talking to Mr. Schiffer at the initial discussion here, there are some
situations that because it's coastal surge coming in and a VE zone,
you're not going to hold out the Gulf of Mexico by development,
because we're not designing them to withstand that 1 OO-year event
from the coastal.
So that's sort of where the word evaluation, you look to see is
there a need to do the calculation. And then if there is a need to do the
calculation, then the system for doing the calculation is already
predetermined.
Ifwe need to clarify that just to state that, I'll be glad to do so.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, you know, it all boils down to
what is legally defensible. If Mr. Klatzkow has no problem with the
word evaluate, I don't have a problem with it.
MR. KLATZKOW: I'm okay.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. The last sentence you have, areas
known to be periodically inundated by intense rainfall. And I now
know that the way it's known is by this map.
How does that map know? Where do you get the data from the map
from?
MR. WILEY: This is information that we have within the
county's GIS system right now. And there are various layers that we
have for periods of inundation. And Mack Hatcher is here, he can
explain a lot more detailed about it than I can.
But we took an old map that was developed by the stormwater
management department, which we call our bubble map, that's the
little red circles you see on there. And that's just areas that we
Page 84
r /' I'
c" :) ~. P" '\f
iii Ii ('~-;1 '
November 28, 2007
traditionally, historically, whatever words you want to use for it, when
you get a big rain event you know you're going to start getting
telephone complaints [rom properties in this area that streets are
underwater, my yard's underwater. It's up against my house. These are
areas that we know that if you start filling in that land, you want to
pass water onto some other property that's not having as bad a
problem today as it may tomorrow.
We then superimpose the two maps together. And again, the
periods we used here for the areas of green are called wetlands, that's
the information for hydroperiods of two months or longer that we have
within the GIS system. And it's calculated based upon elevations and
mapping and things.
That's where this example map comes from. Not that we are
suggesting that this is the exact final product map. This gives an
indication to help people understand we're not saying that if you're in
Collier County, that's automatically you're within this area. We're
looking at the serious areas where you know you have the major flows
and storage of water in the big rain events.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Some of that what I heard you say in the
beginning is some of this map is created from people calling in with
complaints that there's water in their streets?
MR. WILEY: That's where we got the little red circles off our
bubble map. That was years ago that we did that.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The only reason is, I mean, I've driven
through those areas many times, and I've watched the county crews
come in and they clear out a clog in the pipe and all of a sudden there's
no flooding there. But yet 100 people may have called in about their
street being flooded.
I also know that streets are designed to flood. That's where some
of the water is supposed to be held in your irregular storm events. And
you might lose a lane on a four-lane road, so the two higher lanes on
the inside are up higher.
Page 85
r'" ,
, '4j
,
November 28, 2007
But I'm not sure that's -- I hope you didn't use that kind of criteria
or you balanced that out when you took these phone calls and decided
an area was prone to flooding.
MR. WILEY: If it was area that was limited strictly to a lack of
maintenance -- I mean, I've got to be careful how I say that, because
sometimes there's a region which has an overall pattern of lack of
maintenance, which causes the water, it's not just a single pipe.
In looking at this, these are areas that while -- went to sleep again
-- it -- sometimes these areas can be cleared up if there is a serious
capital project-level type of replacement and maintenance. And
sometimes they can't. Other areas, you'll see on here are just areas that
always go underwater.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, well, I don't want to belabor the
point, I understand what you're saying, I just wanted to understand
how the map points got there. And I think you've clarified that for me.
On Page 20, Item D, the fifth line, you talk about wetland or wet.
And this is probably better for Mr. Murray to respond to than you
even. That word, I don't even know how to say it rather than
understand what it means. Is that such a word?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: What, the fifth line, what is it?
MR. WILEY: Wet facultative.
COMMISSIONER HALAS: Oh, facultative.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: See, you even said it wrong, Mr. Wiley,
or somebody did.
What in the world does that mean? Is that not a misspelling or is
that a real word?
MR. WILEY: That is a real word and it is a wetland plant, but it
is able to live wet or dry. It can live in either environment.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Nice way of saying it, I guess.
MR. WILEY: I did not make the word up. I have been accused of
that, but this one I didn't create it.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Under E, it says all new development
Page 86
"ft'I')? ',A 4
. !-~", L
-'. .>i ;,
November 28, 2007
and redevelopment projects shall ensure surrounding properties will
not be adversely impacted.
Well, the word ensure has always been a problematic word, from
what I can tell. I'm just wondering why the word ensure needs to be
there.
MR. WILEY: We talked about this in various other meetings that
we've had, and we're not providing insurance, I-N, but it's an
assurance that the design has taken into consideration where the
water's coming towards the property predevelopment, where it's going
after development, so that you don't pass it on to someone else.
If ensure is not a good word --
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Use assure.
MR. WILEY: Assure is A-S-S-U-R-E, ifthat's a better word, I'm
agreeable to that. We just want to make -- the purpose is to put forth
the effort in the design and the approval process to -- here I'm starting
to use the word ensure again, but to address the issues sufficiently so
that that's not going to be a problem.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, 1 don't know why you need the
word ensure. Why can't it read all new development and
redevelopment projects -- well, I see, okay.
Shall not cause any impacts from that project's influence on
stormwater sheet flow. I think you could reword it to take out the
word adversely and the word ensure. I think both of those words might
be arbitrary. That's all I'm going at.
If you can figure out a way to do that, I think it would help. But
that's my thoughts on it.
And then F, isn't that already in the code? In the LDC?
MR. WILEY: I think it is.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You can't get it --
MR. WILEY: I'm not certain, that's why I stuck it in here --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- a development order without -- and
this is the redundancy that we talked about earlier. This is under your
Page 87
16/ ,1."
1/1 ~.,.
".I-" .
,
November 28, 2007
SDP permitting and your platting and all that. You can't get final
development orders without your state and federal environmental
permits. So why would we repeat it here?
You have a process section, Section 10 of the LDC.
MR. WILEY: Right.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And all that's required in that process
section. So I don't know that that needs to be repeated within the code
itself.
MR. WILEY: I would have to defer to someone who knows the
code better than me.
MS. FABACHER: We'll double check on that, Commissioner.
MR. WILEY: I'm not trying to repeat something, 1 was just
wanting to make sure this was -- in the past there has been some issue
raised that a development order was approved by the county prior to
an agency issuing a permit. And this was tried to head that off so that
claim could not be made again.
But if it's already in there, I have no problem removing it.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: As far as the only other thing I brought
up was E. And again, I'll defer to the county attorney on this, Jeff, the
words ensure and adversely.
MR. KLATZKOW: I could rewrite this, but then end result's
going to be the same meaning. I'm okay with, quite frankly.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Then I'll drop my issue on that.
Anybody else have any other issues on this language?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I do, but Robert was first.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti, then Mr. Schiffer.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: All new development and
redevelopment. What is redevelopment specifically, and what triggers
redevelopment for an existing project?
MR. WILEY: Redevelopment as I think of it, and I'll give you
my rationale for this, is when you have an existing development and
someone wants to come in and has a significant impact upon the
Page 88
~. ,f fl
50" I" J~)
'J': " fr."'
1(.,-< I. ' """
, Novemoer 28, 2007
physical structure or impervious area on the property so that there is
an increase in impervious area, even potentially an increase in fill so
that you are having an impact on the stormwater system.
You have the potential to either prevent water from coming onto
the property or you're passing more water off the property. That's
where this redevelopment comes in.
That doesn't mean you want to haul out the inside of a building
and just renovate inside. We're talking about physical footprint
impacts.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: But if we don't have a specific
definition of redevelopment, I believe. Do we?
MS. FABACHER: We had been working on some draft language
with DSAC on that. Do you have that draft language?
MR. WILEY: I have the e-mail that you sent to me, the draft
language we put together. We can pass that to everyone --
MS. F ABACHER: Why don't you just --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You guys, again, please, wait for one to
finish before the other speaks.
MS. F ABACHER: Why don't you go ahead and read it off.
MR. KLATZKOW: Put it on the monitor.
MR. WILEY: I have extra copies, if you all would like to have it
in your hands right now.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: This is interesting. If you're now coming
up with language to define redevelopment, and redevelopment is
something that's part and parcel to this floodplain management
language, how is it we can approve one today without the other?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: We can't.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And to be honest with you, I think we
probably need some time to think about the definition you've just
passed out.
MS. F ABACHER: Commissioner, just to answer, I think it's part
of the process that we get some guidance from you and we look at
Page 89
'"
161,~ /;
November 28, 2007
these things. We always get a lot of comments. It's never 100 percent
-- it's always under review, while we're working on it.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: If you realize there's no
definition for redevelopment, and you put it in here and leave it open
ended, if no one asks the question, then where does it go?
MS. F ABACHER: No, we do have this issue, it's before the
DSAC still. So we're going back to DSAC in December to answer this
Issue.
There are some sections of the code, such as the architectural
standards, which do define redevelopment for the purposes of that
section, but not -- as far as stormwater, it's a different thing. It's really
more about impervious area than any amount of square footage or
value of an addition, which is the way it works for the architectural
standards.
I mean, we don't have a broad definition of redevelopment that
fits every circumstance in the code. I don't think we could.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, okay. But for this floodplain
management change, we need to have something for redevelopment.
Mr. Midney.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: It seems to me like this definition,
which limits it just to the increase of impervious area, is pretty clear to
me.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I'm just wondering how you
decide when that impervious area is triggered. Because it's looking for
a percentage of a building footprint. And then in the second sentence,
it's looking for an assessed value percentage.
I think those are the parts of the redevelopment definition that we
would need completed.
And I'm wondering why we wouldn't just maybe follow the
FEMA guidelines in that regard. FEMA's triggered floodplains are--
you have to come under new floodplain heights if a certain portion of
Page 90
lilt! A 4
~\.....j ,
November 28, 2007
your building is destroyed or a monetary value has to be replaced, and
that's already a given.
Why don't we look at that.
MR. WILEY: The issue is exactly what you're saying. Do we
want to use the FEMA default guideline of 50 percent ofthe value.
That's why the number, if you'll notice, was blank. We're still
discussing among ourselves, do we want to go with the default 50
percent value or do we want to make it higher or lower.
The rationale behind possibly going lower is where we're heading
in with the amendments to our flood protection ordinance is we will be
benefitting the county in our CRS scoring -- it's a complicated trail
here -- but by simply saying at 49 percent, not 50.
So that's where we're looking to amend our current ordinance to
go to 49. So the question is, do we want this to already say 49 or 50.
That's why the line's blank right now, while we're discussing this with
various people who are providing input to the definition.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: See, for the definition purposes, they get
you out of that hook, since that percentage is going to be defined
elsewhere then in the code, why don't you just reference to whatever
the FEMA standards are for the county, adopted by the county.
MR. WILEY: That would be a great way to do it, sir, because at
that point the definition already exists.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. But if the definition changes for
the FEMA, then it automatically corrects itself with this definition
here.
Yes, Ms. Fabacher?
MS. F ABACHER: That's a different issue, though, because
you're looking at flood damages, and the flood damages could be
exclusively to the interior of a home and you could trip the 50 percent.
It doesn't matter to us in items of stormwater management, it does not
matter to us what you do to the inside of your building. It doesn't
matter. You could spend $500,000 replacing the all the fixtures and
Page 91
1,., l"
I '" ~!
6 J i\,
, rl,
November 28, 2007
remodeling and removing the walls. It wouldn't have any impact on
your impact on stormwater.
You could add another story to your building, it would not
change your footprint, it would not change the stormwater runoff that
you need to deal with.
And the reason that we're looking at another number to be fair,
because there are a lot of properties that will be wanting to do some
renovations that are not going to be compliant, because they're not
compliant with South Florida Water Management District permits
right now.
And I think if you look at the DSAC comments, the thing has
been, these are interim standards before the real standards comes
down. But they're like, where will be the relief for the small property
owner that this might be a burden on.
I don't know that 50 percent and following FEMA would be a
good guideline. We tried to look at the factors that will influence it the
most. And your impervious area will increase your runoff. No amount
of changes to the inside of your building will. So that's why we were
trying to go away from -- not follow the FEMA.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I was looking more at the fact if
someone is 49 or 50 percent damaged, destroyed or to a point where
they got to -- they lose their evaluation to that point, whatever
remodeling or rework effort they do to their property would then
trigger enough redesign to address the newest and latest floodplain
management rules that we would have.
I was just looking at some points --
MS. F ABACHER: I understand where you're coming from.
We're looking for any help that we can get. We're still trying to figure
this one out.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer was next again, then Mr.
Vigliotti after that.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: A couple of things. First thing,
Page 92
71 ~ I """', c'
j~ ;0 V'I f "'!QL .
November~8, 2007
Mark, go back to 18.C at the bottom of the page where you were
concerned about, and I share this with you, the word evaluated.
In building code land, to avoid somebody just walking up there and
saying yeah, that looks good, they add the phrase, via rational
analysis, which essentially means someone's doing some calculations
and stuff like that.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What's the phrase?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Via rational analysis.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh, okay. That sounds a lot better.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The virtue of that is it just keeps
somebody from sitting there whistling with their hands in their pocket
saying that looks good.
And then the other thing is the thing Robert just handed out. One
of the things you're doing is coming up with a percentage that would
apply to the building square footage or the impervious site area. So
essentially, if somebody has a big patio or has a patio that they're
building on top of, they're not increasing the impervious at all.
So what's the intent there, is that you would -- if that patio is
large enough to hit this percentage, it would require -- but essentially
you're not changing the impervious area of the site.
So, you don't need to answer what percentage, but I think that's a
bad idea to equate those two things together. You might want two
different percentages, one for one and one for the other. And that's it.
MR. WILEY: If you would allow me to address that issue. If you
have an existing patio and then you decide you simply want to enclose
it, you have not increased the impervious area at all, so therefore it
would not be applicable.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right, but the way this is
worded, there's increase the building size or -- so you're using Boolean
logic. You know, the building size could trigger the need for
something when essentially you're not increasing the impervious.
So my only suggestion is, those are two good concepts, separate
Page 93
l~
161 n 4
November 28, 2007
them. And maybe there's two different percentages for each. Let's say,
Robert, I have a really large patio. The patio is greater than 50 percent
of my house, and that's your number. And I, you know, enclose it. I've
essentially done nothing to the impervious area of the site but I would
trigger the need -- this would be considered then, the renovation, or
reconstruction, whatever you want to call it.
Does that make sense?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I think that was the intent. I think
the intent was to catch some major renovations, whether they are just
to impervious or not, to bring in things that weren't to the current code
and make them comply if they go to a certain extent of expenditure or
percentage of redevelopment.
I don't know if it was just impervious area, because if you leave it
as just impervious area are you catching all the people that may not
now be in compliance? How do you catch them when they come back
in for a major renovation?
So something else other than just impervious area may trigger a
major renovation, to bring other places into compliance that may not
be able to be brought into compliance otherwise.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well, you know, ifthey have a
large impervious area right now, then in fair play, I don't think -- it's
kind of too late to get them.
I mean, is that the intent, Bob? If I have a really big patio in the
back of my house and I'm going to increase -- I'm going cover it. That
would increase my building square footage 50 percent, you want me
to be considered reconfiguration?
MR. WILEY: No, sir.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: You do?
MR. WILEY: No, sir.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. Then what 1 would do--
MR. WILEY: You have not increased your impervious area of
your property. The distinction we were making is you have properties
Page 94
'" A
lL:6 1 4
November 28, 2007
that have a huge impervious area outside the perimeter of the building,
that they not address changing a building, but they may change
impervious area outside the building, such as a parking lot or
something.
So that's where the two issues -- and I had not even thought ofthe
concept of you have a patio, you're just going to enclose it, that would
increase your building size. I hadn't even thought of that concept.
And the intention is not to catch that person as much as it is if
you're actually making your building bigger, you're changing your
parking lot, you know, for commercial property, things of that nature.
You want to pick up, because they're creating an increase or
they're filling in an area that's already storing water, a parking lot
that's known to flood all the time. You're wanting to catch that so that
you, through the development process, you're also alleviating
problems that are already out there.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right. And my only suggestion
is to separate the two, that's all. You know, building footprint is one
thing, impervious is another thing. And come up with maybe different
percentages.
MR. WILEY: That's a very good point of clarification. So that
you understand where I was coming from.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron?
COMMISSIONER CARON: But ifthe intent is to correct some
problems that already exist during a redevelopment phase, I don't see
why you wouldn't be looking at a situation like Brad talked about.
If it's 50 percent or more of the building that's going to be redone
and we know already there are water management issues, why
wouldn't you take that opportunity to get them corrected during the
renovation period?
MR. WILEY: Well, the discussion's basically been along the
lines in an attempt to be fair and equitable to property owners. If they
are not creating additional runoff then why would we penalize them?
Page 95
16; A
Novembe~8, 2007
It's the same -- I know you're saying you have an existing
problem. Yes, we do know that situation is out there. But we're trying
to be as fair as we can so that we don't face some claims of --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't think the issue is you're not --
you're trying to penalize them or not. I think what happened is we
have buildings that were erected 20,30,40 years ago that back then
had very little, if any, compliance for water runoff, water quality,
water treatment.
People come in and buy those old buildings and they think what's
the best way I can make some money off this building.lfIjust
renovate the inside and resell it, I don't have to trigger any changes to
the outside. And as a result I can still keep my poor water quality and
dump everything on my neighbors and not have to worry about it. But
yet I've made a windfall over my renovations that I now can turn an
apartment into a condo or something like that.
I think you could utilize those occurrences to not only require
that if you're going to improve something for your own benefit, you
certainly can improve to the benefits of the surrounding properties
your water treatment that was overlooked 20 or 30 years ago.
I think that was what I thought you were getting to. I now
understand you're only looking purely at the impervious square
postage stamp. But I think you could look further to bring other
projects into compliance that badly need to be.
MR. WILEY: Again, what we're looking at is wanting to go the
direction that you are saying. But understanding these are interim
regulations, we felt like perhaps that should be addressed as watershed
management plans are being developed over the next few years, which
will also be done by 2010.
If you want to tighten it up, I'm in agreement with that. But we
were trying to avoid coming on as though we're very onerous,
knowing those are interim, while the watershed management plan
goes through the process to analyze specifically what are the problems
Page 96
,.."'1'
, .f'" '1
j r'--~I ;,
:1'1 -J W
~~
ilj II
""~ -' . 1l " t'
,;r'i! '!J
November 28,2007
and come up with specific solutions. That's just why we were saying it
this way.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's fair enough, Mr. Wiley, I would
have to agree with you then. And to that aspect, I think you're
certainly, this redevelopment definition needs to get cleaned up and
focused. And that's the key to this whole thing now.
So I would suggest that based on the input you've gotten from us
today, you rework that redevelopment definition and come back with
it as precise as it needs to be for your interim period.
We made a couple suggested changes to C on Page 18. And I
think if you come back with those, we would be ready to finalize our
recommendations on this. But I think that needs to be done first.
Does anybody else have a different thought on this?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Okay, Mr. Wiley?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Mark, before that, a point of
information. Shouldn't everything -- like, let me ask, for example, let's
say that we approved it today and then the DSAC changed the
wording. Would that be proper in the process?
MS. FABACHER: We would have to bring back the changes that
DSAC made to you.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. So obviously we would
have to wait anyway, then, if they're going to work on it some more.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I don't think we have to wait for
them, but I think that they can't put something through without us. I
think it's a different direction.
MR. KLATZKOW: You're the last stop on the train route to the
board.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So if we had approved it today--
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ifwe had approved it today we could
approve it today and it doesn't have to go back to DSAC. DSAC's an
advisory board to everyone, and we can take their input and utilize it if
Page 97
,~ A
I ~lvember ft, 2007
we want to or we can still make recommendations of our own.
Are there any other flood -- Mr. Wiley's issues?
MS. FABACHER: Not on this one. He has a couple other
amendments.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We're going to those next.
MS. F ABACHER: Okay, sure thing. The next amendment we
will look at is on Page 9i in your book. It's Areas of Special Flood
Hazard. And that would be Section 3.02.03 and Section 3.02.05, Basis
for Establishing the Areas of Special Flood Hazard.
This is really a housekeeping issue. The flood insurance rate --
new flood insurance rate maps have been issued, and we're just
updating the code.
Could have said, as amended, but actually we only get these
things every five to 10 years, so we're referencing the new firms.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody have any questions? Page 91
through Page 93.
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Is there a recommendation for
approval of Section 3.02.03 and 3.02.05 as submitted?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Move to approve.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made by Commissioner Caron,
seconded by --
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: (Indicating.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti. Any further discussion?
All in favor, signify by saying aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Page 98
16 Lov~mbe~8, 2007
Anybody opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries.
MS. F ABACHER: Thank you. The last one for Mr. Wiley would
be on Page 141 in your book, Drainage Facility Level of Service. And
let me give you the section number on that. That's going to be Section
6.02.01 and Section 6.02.04 generally. And this is the Drainage
Facility Level of Service Requirements.
And I'm going to let Mr. Wiley explain this one to you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Before you do, you had just referenced
two sections. The section on Page 141, we have 6.02.00. Is there
another section involved?
MS. FABACHER: Well, actually, that is just a title. That's not
being impacted whatsoever.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, when we make our motion,
and Ms. Student in the past in the old, prior LDC meetings, has said
that we need to reference the LDC section to which the motion
applies, so I've been trying to be careful to do that. So that's why I
caught your notation. So if we reference 6.02.00, will that be
adequate?
MS. FABACHER: We've advertised it as 6.02.01 and 6.02.02. If
we need to advertise it another way in the future, please advise. It's
just -- we don't have to -- you can just scratch through the 6.02.00. We
were just trying to be more specific in our advertising.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And I'm trying to be very specific in our
motions because we don't want any mistakes --
MS. FABACHER: Okay, well, strike through that whole line
then.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay.
MS. F ABACHER: Forget it's there.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Before Mr. Wiley goes into a
dissertation on this issue, these are strictly corrections, typographical
Page 99
16JA 1.1
,
November 28, 2007
errors in the LDC. I don't know if we need a lot of discussion, unless a
member of this panel has a question.
Mr. Schiffer?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: We reference quite often LOS in
here. Is that an acronym that's up in the front? It's not bolded.
MS. F ABACHER: I'm pretty sure -- we don't bold the acronyms,
just the definitions. I'm pretty sure it's level of service. Everybody uses
it.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I know what it means. And
Robert, the use of the word capital, what is that for, just out of -- I
think I know the definition of the various uses of the word capital.
MR. WILEY: You have two different types of funding within the
county: You have capital funding, you have operation and
maintenance funding related to the facilities.
So that capital facility is referencing an existing facility in the
ground because it is meeting the threshold of valuation, things of that
nature.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Good enough.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any other questions?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Hearing none, is there a motion to
recommend approval of6.02.01 and 6.02.02?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Motion to approve.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: (Indicating.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron actually stated a motion, Mr.
Vigliotti raised his hand. So let's do Ms. Caron as the motion maker
and Mr. Vigliotti seconded. Any discussion?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All those in favor, signify by saying aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye.
Page 100
161 )j
, ,q.
November 28, 2007
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Anybody opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries.
Mr. Wiley, thank you very much, sir. We'll see you for that one
remaining one next time around.
MR. WILEY: Yes, sir. Thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you.
MS. F ABACHER: And commissioners, I'd like to say that LOS,
the abbreviation, is in the front of the code.
Okay, we're going to switch gears now from engineering aspects
to the environmental aspects.
I would like to look at protected vegetation, the amendment for
the eagle's nest. It's on Page 7 in your book. It is -- for the record, it is
Section 3.05.05, Criteria for Removal of Protected Vegetation.
Steven Lenberger with the Environmental Services Department is
here for any questions, discussion.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Hi, Steve.
MR. LENBERGER: Good afternoon.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I tell you, I attended an HOA meeting
where Steve made a presentation on the exotic and overused -- let's
see, undesirable plants in Collier County. I'll tell you, you'd be amazed
at the amount of information that this man has and what I learned at
that meeting. There's a lot more plants out there that we don't want
that I ever knew. So I went out and pulled all my flowers out. But he
did a good job. It was a very, very interesting meeting.
Now, this issue starts on Page 7, and this was the result of
direction from a couple of boards regarding -- if you recall an eagle's
nest that was torn down in a dead tree in Pine Ridge, I believe, a few
Page 10 1
r'6' A~"4
November 28,2007
months back.
Steve.
MR. LENBERGER: Yes, a few months back. For the record,
Steven Lenberger, Environmental and Engineering Services.
Yes, the tree was cut down. I believe it was a living tree, though,
for this particular one. Authorization -- the homeowners went to the
Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission and the U.S. Fish
& Wildlife Service and asked their permission to have the tree
removed. And they received authorization via e-mail from those
agencies allowing them to do so.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, are there any questions from the
planning commission?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I always do.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Steve, on Page 12, P, there's
nothing really concerned about the wording, just the method of
wording. Is the intent that all those paragraphs apply? Essentially if
the first thing applies, then you're subject to the next paragraph.
And my concern is just the way it's worded, it may end up where
somebody could break the link, and that's not the intent. The intent is
to achieve all of those things, correct?
MR. LENBERGER: They're all different criteria which would
apply. And they're all applicable.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So in the first case that -- let me
just see.
MR. LENBERGER: The first one, removal -- prohibit in
preserves, is that the one you're referring to?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Somebody gets the permit in the
first paragraph, correct?
MR. LENBERGER: Right, that's correct.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. Then we go on. Then he's
subject to the following criteria only ifhe gets that permit.
Page 102
16/
November 28, 2007
MR. LENBERGER: That's correct.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. And then that might be
working.
MR. LENBERGER: If it's in a preserve, it's prohibited, except if
it's a threat to human safety.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So without the permit, nothing
below that applies.
MR. LENBERGER: That's right.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The fourth paragraph down, this
only -- the only concern is if it's the principal structure cannot be
constructed.
In other words, so essentially all attachments to that are -- would
allow the tree to be removed, but accessory structures would not,
meaning a structure that's probably in most zoning 20 feet away. Is
that right?
MR. LEN BERGER: The third criteria, that's the cavities located
on a parcel in which the single-family lots have been subdivided. Is
that the one you're referring to?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Correct. In such a manner that
the principal structure cannot be constructed.
What kind of criteria do you go through for that. Because
obviously, based on design you could work around a tree, but -- so
what happens there? I mean, is this -- if the thing is within the
setbacks, or how do you determine that?
MR. LENBERGER: We haven't set the specific criteria. We
would obviously look at the setback requirements. There's obviously
flexibility there as far as the design of the house. We were trying to
constrain that.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Because obviously this would
happen prior to the construction ofthe house. In other words, there's a
lot of options there. The way somebody would prove that to you is
prove that it was within the setbacks of a principal structure.
Page 103
'" ,
'lI'? It! b
Nove~b~; 28,2007
MR. LENBERGER: And it was necessary to build the principal
structure.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Based on his current design.
MR. LENBERGER: That's correct.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And then the last thing, you
exclude the bald eagles in the last paragraph.
MR. LENBERGER: That's correct.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Is that because they're covered
carefully somewhere else, or -- removal of vegetation with a nest or
cavity of a protected listed -- other than a bald eagle where the nest of
cavity is located --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Better talk a little slower there, Brad.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay, I'm sorry. What I was
doing was just reading that section. I'll do it again.
It says, removal of the vegetation with a nest or cavity of a protected
or listed species other than the bald eagle where the nest or cavity is
located.
In other words, again, I do have concern with -- and Jeff, maybe
it's -- is the way this paragraph is going down, because everything is
kind of linked in logic as and, and, and. And there's not the typical
comma and or something at the end of each paragraph.
But are you saying that this would not apply if it's a bald eagle?
MR. LENBERGER: That's correct. The eagle nest would be
protected.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Meaning that you could take it down for
any species if you go through the process, but you can't take it down if
it's a bald eagle.
MR. LENBERGER: That's correct.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The scary thing is maybe, you know,
when I was reading this over, I got the impression that if it was a bald
eagle, you didn't have to go into this phrase and you could take it
Page 104
,.,:0:""',
1~ A 4
November 28, 2007
down. I mean, that's -- what keeps you from doing that, something
someplace else?
MR. LENBERGER: I didn't quite get what you were saying,
could you repeat that.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So it says the removal of
vegetation other than a bald -- okay, so in other words, no way can a
bald eagle nest --
MR. LENBERGER: That's correct.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: All right. I think I got that.
MR. LENBERGER: We believe that was the direction given to
us by the advisory boards. If we misinterpreted that, please let us
know.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Hi. Page 10, at the top.
Recognizing Mark's pulling his flowers out because he recognized
some things, but Joe Doakes goes and buys a plot of land or buys a
house, actually, that's there, and wants to do some things. How are
they made aware that for instance, ground cover may have a listed
species? What do we do to help them? Or do we do anything or put it
entirely on their responsibility to do that?
Did you understand my question?
MR. LENBERGER: Yes. No, I understand. It would be their
responsibility. Generally the species would be pretty obvious as far as
larger animals, bald eagles, red-cockaded woodpeckers. But I
understand where you're going. Yes, it would be their responsibility.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: It says ground cover.
MR. LENBERGER: Right, I understand.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I don't know what species may
be associated with ground cover. I know we have turtles that we're
concerned about. I don't know -- that's below ground, certainly.
MR. LENBERGER: That's true.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I'm just wondering. I have no
Page 105
161j~ l~
November 28, 2007
problem with making it stringent enough so that we properly keep
people from doing the wrong thing, but I just wonder if we don't have
some vines out there tripping people into bad situations. And we
require of them to be fully knowledgeable. We don't lend them a hand
m any way.
MR. LENBERGER: That's correct.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay, thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Was there a specific species that
you were interested in that regard?
MR. LENBERGER: No, I don't think the ground cover would
matter if it was there or not. We could strike that.
COMMISSIONER CARON: I'm thinking that Mr. Murray has a
point. lfthere's not something specific that we're concerned about, I
don't know that there's a need to include it.
MR. LENBERGER: I agree. We could remove it.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What would you remove then?
MR. LENBERGER: The ground cover.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Just the word ground cover?
MR. LENBERGER: Right.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is that it, Ms. Caron?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I had a question, and it would involve
this definition first. The second line after the parenthetical. It says that
has a nest or a cavity of a federal, state or county-protected listed
speCIes.
My concern is that you could go out and clear a tract of land or
you could go out and cut a tree down. You may not know there's any
species in there until it hits the ground and then flies out you see it
there.
Do we need to insert the word known, that has a known nest or
cavity of a -- I guess not a known cavity, but something to the fact that
Page 106
N~~:Ler 18~ iit7
it doesn't penalize people for something they couldn't have known?
MR. LENBERGER: Bald eagle nests, we know where they all
are.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I know, but this is applying to more than
that.
MR. LENBERGER: I know, that's what I'm trying to say. We
don't know where all the red-cockaded woodpecker cavity trees are.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right.
MR. LENBERGER: And Big Cypress fox squirrels, they could
change their nest locations. We have no way of tracking that.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But if someone were to inadvertently
destroy one of those wooded plants that had a red-cockaded
woodpecker or a fox squirrel might have been living in it, and it's
discovered by a passerby like this eagle's nest coming down was
afterwards and saying, oh, my God, look what you did, then a person
comes around and gets nailed for $35,000. Well, I think the fine is
35,000.
MR. LENBERGER: That was for the eagle.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh, for the eagle. Okay, $5,000. Well, I
don't know if that's really fair. In fact, I don't think it is. I'm wondering
how we could address that.
Do you have any suggestions or any ideas?
MR. LENBERGER: Did you want to limit this to certain
protected species?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, no. I think all species that are
protected are covered by it. But I'm wondering, how do we -- don't we
mean known nests or known cavity trees being utilized by these
protected species?
MR. LENBERGER: We would have no way of tracking that, that
would be the problem.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, that part of it concerns me.
And then if you think about that and then go to P where it says
Page 107
Jr ./ '
{. ,', ..'.
" ,/ ,. ,
~ \ ,," ", ~
November 28, 2007
removal of -- and you get into a restatement of the definition, maybe
you could say removal of protected vegetation, when permits from
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation are provided.
Now, if you think about that and you go back to that definition of
vegetation protected and we want to figure out whether they're known
or not, maybe that's where we bring in that part of the definition of
vegetated protection is when permits from Florida Fish and Wildlife
Service are required. Because they would only be required when that
vegetation was an endangered species or a threatened species habitat,
would they not?
I'm trying to weave the two together so that we're not nailing
someone for an honest not being able to know something was there.
And I can tell you, these cabbage palms and things, you could
knock a cabbage palm down, and once it hits the ground all kinds of
things would could come out of there and you wouldn't know they
were up there in the meantime. And I wouldn't want to see someone
have to pay $5,000 for a $75 cabbage tree because they didn't know
something was in there they should have been worried about.
MR. LENBERGER: I think the main species are going to be the
three that I already mentioned. And they're generally fairly obvious to
recognize. But no, we would have no way of being able to track that.
Just no way.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, maybe we ought to put this back to
where it started out to be, which was bald eagle protection, and not
necessarily go into the others that are already covered by federal and
state species.
Ms. Caron.
COMMISSIONER CARON: And/or if it's three specific species
that we should be concerned about, then maybe we just list those three
and not worry about anything else. I mean, that's pretty simple.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think this broadens it too much. I don't
think it needs to be without the evidence that we have a situation that
Page 108
_ r
16 I ~ l~
November 28, 2007
someone was destroying something intentionally. That's a big
difference.
And also, for the -- my other concern, and I'll finish up on my
questions here, is the $35,000. I mean, that's pretty steep. What is the
federal penalties for bald eagles?
MR. LENBERGER: 35,000 was on the draft Bald Eagle
Management Plan, that was the fine. Actually, it was a recommended
donation if you were to get a permit to remove a bald eagle nest. So
that's where staff started from.
The 5,000 number came through our Land Development Code.
We looked at the fines that we have currently in place, and the
maximum fine we have, if you potentially could impact a sea turtle
nest, would be 5,000.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I personally think 35 is a little extreme.
MR. LENBERGER: I look for your direction, if you want to
change that.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think all of them ought to be 5,000 if
that's the maximum we currently have. I don't know why we'd want to
go above it.
Ms. Fabacher.
MS. F ABACHER: For the record, Catherine Fabacher.
I think that it would be worth it to a developer to pay $5,000 to take
out an eagle's nest. I don't think that would do what you wanted to do.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, then, why don't we make it
500,000 then. Really, you're talking billion dollar developments in
here. If you want to worry about that, let's make it half a million.
That's as unreasonable as 35, as far as I'm concerned.
I think the philosophy you're saying is more -- you've got federal
and state laws that would kick in that would have a much wider and
larger impact on a developer than a county ordinance.
MS. F ABACHER: But they didn't. That's the problem.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, this was a single-family home and it
Page 109
'" A b
Nov~mter 28,' 21)07
was based on -- and you're telling me you want a single-family home
person to be nailed for $35,000? This isn't a big developer that was
doing that. This was a homeowner. And they were wrong in doing it.
MS. F ABACHER: I understand your concern. My only point was
is, to a larger developer $5,000 would be worth it to get rid of the
eagle's nest. That was my only comment.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't think the Stock Development got
away with 5,000 or $35,000. And I think the feds adequately took care
of that.
Mr. Schmitt?
MR. SCHMITT: Can I make a recommendation that we not put
any fine in here at all, given your concerns? And they're certainly
valid.
I would say this would proceed through any type of enforcement
through federal enforcement. It will go to the Code Enforcement
Board if it's a code action and let them assess the fine.
So there would be some language that we would put in here that
would describe that the fine or any adjudication will be processed or
be any -- prosecution, it will be prosecuted through normal channels, I
guess. I'm looking at the county attorney.
MR. KLA TZKOW: I do think you have to list some fine,
whether it's $500 or whatever you deem is appropriate.
It you take this to Code Enforcement Board, they usually looking
at continuing fines for, you know, take care of this for $50 a day and
we'll give you 90 days to do it. This isn't something they'd really look
at.
MR. SCHMITT: But the state has -- we would -- anything like
this we normally turn over to the state first and they prosecute. The
issue here was that the state didn't pursue the last case. It was just
merely -- I guess I'm --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I think we ought to leave--
MR. SCHMITT: Ms. Caron, you remember, just pretty much
Page 110
16/A 4,
November 28, 2007
they shrugged their shoulders and said oh, gee.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Right. And I think as far as fines
are concerned, it's not to be able to charge these fines, it's to prevent
people from taking actions that would cause them to have to pay these
fines.
If you put a significant fine up there, then people will look and
say, oh, wait a minute, I'd better follow the rules and I'd better do
things the right way. And that's the only point. The point is not to
charge people $35,000, it's to prevent people from taking actions that
we don't want them to take. So --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Fabacher.
MS. F ABACHER: I was going to suggest some language.
Perhaps we could may be fined up to 35,000.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Jeff?
MR. KLATZKOW: I'm trying to remember. I think on code
enforcement, $5,000 is the limit that you can do for typical code
enforcement finding. If you just follow that track, just make it $5,000
and we're done.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: To be safe, I think that would be a good
direction to go in.
MR. KLATZKOW: Yeah, I could double check the maximum,
but I think it's 5,000.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I had spoke to the Conservancy about it,
and their issue was not to fine money either. So I don't see why 5,000
wouldn't work across the board.
I think, Steve, this has got to come back. I think you need to
refine the language to the species you're talking about. I would suggest
if you're going to use a definition, then use it, and in P, you don't need
to redefine it there. As we mentioned.
Reduce -- change the fine references and I think we'll be pretty
close to -- and Brad.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I still-- and this is P, I mean, 1
Page III
1( ! A 4
November 28,2007
would be -- and just maybe Jeff, you could look at it. But if the first
paragraph, the second paragraph, you had parentheses one,
parentheses two for the one after that, then I think that would be in a
more understandable code. Because you're saying the following
criteria.
And then let me just go back to what would be parentheses four,
the last paragraph. Is that where you tell everybody that they can't cut
down a bald eagle nest?
Because the concern I have is you have a sentence and then you
exclude the bald eagle nests and then you have other criteria. I think
somebody could prudently interpret that that the bald eagle doesn't
have to meet that criteria. But it doesn't say you can't cut it down yet.
And if the intent of this is to not cut down bald eagle nests, why
doesn't you just say you can't cut down bald eagle nests.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Wait a minute, our code would be way
too short.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And I think this is the -- I mean,
prior to this you could cut down a bald eagle nest in a residential
single- family property, correct?
MR. LENBERGER: That's correct.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And this is the thing that stops
you from doing that. So I think Jeff, am I wrong on four, the way --
MR. KLA TZKOW: No, you're absolutely --
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: -- the way it's written there --
MR. KLA TZKOW: You're looking for clarity in the code, which
is unique, quite frankly. I think it's a great idea. And if, quite frankly,
all we want to do is protect the bald eagle and nothing else, we could
reduce this to --
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: One word, couple words --
MR. KLATZKOW: This whole thing to just a paragraph and
you're done.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think we need to look at hanging it up,
Page 112
ool'Y..>t>l
16""'" ^,
.',1'
"
"
November 28, 2007
so --
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I honestly think the way four is
written, 1 could argue that I can cut down a bald eagle nest that has
nothing to do with the principal building. You've excluded bald eagle
nests from the principal building requirement.
When you talked to me prior to that, you were saying that was
the meat ofthe whole thing, that's where you say you can't cut down a
bald eagle nest. And that's not what it's saying.
Thank you, I'm done, Mark, thanks.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I fully agree with you, Brad. So maybe
Steve, you can come back -- when you come back to us, we can get
some of this refined down to a lot less verbiage.
MR. KLA TZKOW: Just for direction, because there's been a lot
of direction on the board, are we looking to limit this to just the bald
eagle or are we looking at this for all protected species?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It started out with the bald eagle, and it
seems that Steve had mentioned a couple of other species. But I
would, since those haven't been issues and we have other management
plans and species ordinance, rather than get into those, I'm not sure
what they take. It was real clear, a bald eagle's nest is monitored,
they're everywhere, everybody knows where they're at.
I suggest for clarity, why don't we just leave it for now to the
bald eagle, and if we have to add others later, we look at doing that.
Does that --
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I'm in favor ofthat.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And then the code can say you
can't cut down a bald eagle nest.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. It's very simple, we've got a
shorter, healthy --
MR. KLATZKOW: And if you do, it's a $5,000 fine.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Right. Done.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: There you go. So Steve, with that, we
Page 113
-".~
';0", jt~; 4'
J;""\~1j un.
November 28, 2007
just saved you a lot of time.
MR. LENBERGER: Thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, sir. I know we're going to
stay here till 1 :00, and that's only about an hour away, but I think we'll
give the court reporter another break until 12:10, which is seven
minutes, so that will help.
(A break was taken.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Welcome back. We'll resume the
meeting of the Land Development Code, Cycle 2. We're going to be
out of here, I've now been told, at five minutes to 1 :00. We will stop --
MR. SCHMITT: We need to get out of here by 1 :00, so --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We'll make sure we're out--
MR. SCHMITT: Five or ten minutes to so we can clean up our
areas and move out.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Catherine, what's next on the list?
MS. F ABACHER: Next on the list is going to be Steve
Lenberger again, and we're looking at the preservation standards
priorities on Page 95 in your book. That is going to be Section
3.05.07.A.3. And this is an EAR-based amendment where the DCA
asked the environmental and engineering services department to
rearrange the priorities.
As soon as Steve gets back, I think he'll be able to answer any
questions you have on it. But it's really not very much of an issue.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The underlined on Page 96, that's most
of what we're -- this is all about, right?
MS. F ABACHER: Right, exactly. They're just changing the
priorities in order, the different order of the priorities.
Here he is.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any questions from the planning
commission?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I do.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray.
Page 114
16i A 4
November 28, 2007
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Oh, you're there, okay. Page 96,
first item on A. Wetland or upland areas known to be utilized by listed
species or that serve as known corridors? Or do you want corridors,
because it's a discovery, oh, there's a corridor.
MR. LENBERGER: We would use technical assistance from the
agencies as far as the corridors are concerned for listed species. So we
would have to rely on their technical assistance.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay. Then on new F, formerly
H, all other native habitats. Does that include that ground cover again?
MR. LENBERGER: All native habitats, yes.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay. Well, I'm still not clear on
that A section of where you have to be dependent upon them. So in
other words, they determine what the corridors are?
MR. LENBERGER: That's correct. The compo plan requires staff
to -- they get technical assistance from the state and federal wildlife
agencies regarding listed species. We would rely on them for this --
determining this.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So if you have been depending
upon them to do that, provide that information for you, somewhere,
someplace in your organization you have maps, I presume, where
you've patterned in all these corridors. You don't ask them each time
to tell you the same corridors, right?
MR. LENBERGER: We have on the GIS data system
information regarding panthers telemetry, also even black bear. And
so we know pretty much the areas they're inhabiting. And you can
pretty much see corridors for these larger ranging animals. And when
they re-did the comprehensive plan, they took that into effect.
Other species, it would be -- we don't have that information. We
don't have a layer identifying these corridors. They would have to be
determined on a case-by-case basis, and we would have to rely on the
wildlife agencies for their expertise to determine that.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So it is possible that over a
Page 115
'i 'P'q 4) "
; ,r, iI't;/ B,
- 'oj /. '1 :!)J.
November 28, 2007'
period of time you might be asking those organizations for the
information on something you already had, been made known to you.
You might be asking for the same thing again, am I right?
MR. LENBERGER: It is a possibility --
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Or does it change so much?
MR. LENBERGER: We have products that may be in a
particular area and there may be quite a lapse of time before another
product would come in the same area. So the staff there may not be
knowledgeable on what previous technical assistance has been issued.
But then, again, the technical assistance could change, too,
depending on what data the wildlife agencies have acquired since
then.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I think I understand your
circumstance. And I was just thinking the resource of something that
you retained, that you had to access would certainly be your first
effort. Notwithstanding the fact that you may have a policy that
requires you to go to the other people.
But I thought that then they became known corridors. But you're
saying that there really are no known corridors, they vary all the time.
Is that right?
MR. LENBERGER: I wouldn't say they vary, but they're not
known. We only know from telemetry points where they occur for
larger ranging animals such as panther.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So I suppose, just to continue but
for the last statement, suppose it's possible at one point in time the
absence of telemetry would allow somebody to do something on that
property that six months later they would be precluded from doing. Is
that theoretically possible?
MR. LENBERGER: The presence of a telemetry point for a
panther on-site wouldn't necessarily prohibit development. They're
looking at the overall picture as far as the panther movement. And the
federal government requires compensation mitigation for impacts to
Page 116
IIlll" A
._, I' I.t
.
November 28, 2007
panther habitat.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay, I appreciate what you're
doing.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Steve, when you go in for your
corridors, they would be the most recent ones based on deaths and
births of the various species that have to create the corridors in the
first place?
So it will be changing. You can't get something today, lock it in
and say this is a wildlife corridor, because next week or the month
later when the new eggs hatch or whatever happens, you may not have
the same corridor needed by the same species.
So they will be variable, and they will be fluctuating and they
will be responsive based on the time you asked for them from the
agencies, I would assume.
MR. LENBERGER: That could be based on a variety of factors
too, habitat quality, changes over time, development. There's a lot of
things that could affect that.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Mr. Midney?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, it seems like what you've
done is you've moved E and F up above Band C, or C and D. Can you
explain why you did that?
MR. LENBERGER: For the types of habitats, xeric scrub, dune,
strand and hardwood hammocks are very limited in the county. And
they wanted to afford them more protection. That's why they were
moved up in the selection criteria.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: And for A, you're focusing on
corridors for the movement of wildlife. It would seem that C, the
WRAP score or the uniform wetland -- whatever that is -- wetland
mitigation assessment score, those are -- seem like they would be
more easily quantified by a biologist going in than trying to determine
where the corridors for the movement of wildlife are, since it's hard to
see them, they probably mostly move at night.
Page 11 7
n
NoveJ~28, 2007 !)$~
MR. LENBERGER: It would depend on the listed species
involved.
But like I said, we would use technical assistance, and this is
what was adopted in the comprehensive plan as the selection criteria.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Do you think that the WRAP is
more objective or more easy to measure than trying to figure out
where the corridors of wildlife are?
MR. LENBERGER: I can't answer that question. You can figure
out the functionality on a WRAP score or UWMAM. Movement of
wildlife, I don't have the expertise. And you can't necessarily just
pinpoint that, you'd have to rely on the agencies.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: It would seem to me that you
could quantify the WRAP easier because you can actually ground
truth it.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney, unfortunately, and I don't
mean to interrupt, but I wanted to point out to you, we've already
discussed and accepted all this in the CCME. We have to change the
code to correspond to the CCME, we don't have a choice in the order.
So just in case you're trying to get the order changed, 1 don't
think we can do that here today without going back and changing the
CCME.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: No, I was just trying to understand
the rationale.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other questions? Ms. Caron?
COMMISSIONER CARON: No, that was my comment.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Hearing none, are we ready for a motion
on Section 3.05.07?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Motion to approve.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is there a second?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: I'll second it.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney seconded it, Ms. Caron
made the motion. Any discussion?
Page 118
-..... 41
761 '~,:
'" ,~
,~
.II ,~
November 28, 2007
All in favor, signify by saying aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Anybody opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you.
MS. FABACHER: All righty, commissioners, we have one last
topic for environmental area, and that would be marinas on Page 99 in
your book. Two pages on, and that is Section 5.05.0 2.G.
And by way of introduction, this was a BCC-directed, directed to
exclude the shoreline within conservation easement areas for use in
the calculation of maximum number of wet slips in accordance with
the Manatee Protection Plan.
You'll see that obviously the EAC agreed with it and the DSAC
did not.
But anyway, if you have any questions, Steve can answer them.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any questions on this?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'll ask one.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And I honestly don't really
believe this, but one of the things we've done in fair play is allowed
people if they're going to conserve land to use that for density and
things. Is there a reason why we wouldn't keep that fair play going
here?
And Donna has an answer for me, I think.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Yes, I do.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm sure there are probably -- a lot of
Page 119
T, g I A.. ~ 'At.
November 28, 2007
people might have answers for you on that one.
Go ahead.
COMMISSIONER CARON: First of all, I would venture to say
that in 99.9.99999 percent of the time no one grants a conservation
easement without getting something for it to begin with, and/or have it
to offer it as mitigation for something else that they're getting.
What this does is prevent double dipping and being able to use
these conservation easements for more than one thing.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. A concern off of that,
though. Would somebody ever start designing their conservation
easements away from the water to prevent losing the shoreline, at least
this calculation of shoreline?
COMMISSIONER CARON: That's up to us.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What I think you're trying to say is if
you had a shoreline as defined here, and you wanted to utilize it for
something to calculate boat slips with, could you come back in and
stop your conservation easement one or two feet short of the shoreline
and have a strip that you could then use to calculate lineal footage for
boat slips?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: That's even cleverer than what I
was Imagmmg.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: That's what I thought you were
. ..
Imagmmg.
MS. FABACHER: I think that's the intent of this amendment, to
prevent that --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right, that's what I'm getting at--
MS. F ABACHER: Oh, okay, thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- and that's what I was trying to get--
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But didn't you describe a
situation where the conservation easement wasn't at the shoreline. In
other words, let's say the guy pulled it back such a way that the
easement was off the shoreline.
Page 120
1161l "
November 28, 2007
Anyway, I'm going to vote in favor of it, I just wanted to throw
out the fair play question, that's all.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think they could probably try to argue
that the conservation easement may not go to the shoreline, but I'm not
sure how they'd get away with that because from the shoreline down it
would be considered like jurisdictional. So how could you get away
from doing that if it's part of the shoreline.
That's probably why this helps define it. So are there any other
comments on this particular issue?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Motion to approve.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion to approve. And that is LDC
Section 5.05.02.
Is there a second?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: I'll second.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney seconded. Motion is made
by Commissioner Caron. Any discussion?
All in favor, signify by saying aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Any opposed.
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries.
MS. F ABACHER: Thank you, commissioners. Thank you,
Steven. We'll see you back on the 12th.
Okay, I'd like to continue, since I'm the only one left, to do the
ones that I have some knowledge of.
First one we'll go to is on Page 107 in your book. This is going to be
Section 5.06.05, X and Y. You've seen this before. I hope it looks
Page 121
'f A J.
cJ" ' ' 'f.
November 28, 2007
familiar to you. We passed it in the last cycle. But unfortunately, when
we went to write the ordinance, we noted that we had not advertised
properly. So we're simply bringing it back, properly advertised this
time.
If you have any questions, I'd be happy to answer them.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, we unanimously recommended
approval last time. I hope we haven't changed our position on there.
Hearing no comments, is there a motion to reapprove
recommendations for 3.05.10.A.6, 30.05.04.G.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'll do it, Mark.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Pardon me?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well, Paul and I are fighting
over who gets to do it.
Paul can have it.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You're going to recommend deny or
approve, Paul?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Approve, please.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made by Commissioner Midney,
second by Commissioner Schiffer. Is that an affirmative, Brad?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Yes.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Any discussion?
All in favor, signify by saying aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Anybody opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries.
MS. F ABACHER: Thank you, commissioners. Now, if we can
Page 122
'f ;/
,<.
" ,;
November 28, 2007
move to Page 73. And this is going to be for Section 1.08.02.
A little bit of background. I had read this definition for a long
time and one day said well, this doesn't make any sense. So I tried to
correct it.
You'll see that on the fourth line it talks about -- it says neither or
both of the previous separate nonconforming lots. It's hard to
understand, but the way I read it, I thought it should be either.
But I have had discussions with former county attorney office
staff that wrote it. And they said if I take out the neither, then I turn
the definition around 180 degrees. But I just perhaps need some
direction on this one. 1 had said that we --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Have you been running into problems
with it as left as it was --
MS. F ABACHER: No.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- because it seems like it provides a
better opportunity left as it was, because then you've got neither or
both, so you -- would mean you could go either direction with it.
Whereas if you change it to either or both, you may be limiting
yourself to half.
I read it too. I was confused by why it was being changed. I
didn't know if it was needed. I thought there may be some reason
behind it.
MS. FABACHER: No, if you're in agreement with it. I just have
trouble understanding the definition altogether, but --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Did you ask the tax assessor's office if
there was a problem with it, since it involves them?
MS. F ABACHER: No.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And if they've not complained, maybe
we ought to leave well enough alone. I think it might be more
confusing to change it than just to leave it.
MS. FABACHER: Okay. Well, I talked to the former staff and I
will talk to the assessor's office and ask them.
Page 123
161 J(1 ..~
,./"~ A '. "';;1' .;'
"';
November 28, 2007
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Mark?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes, sir, Mr. Murray.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Is there an issue that should
apply here for the word adjacent versus abutting?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, lot splits, they're probably going to
be always side by side.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Abutting, right?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Where it's adjacent here, two or
more adjacent, legal nonconforming lots.
Adjacent as I understand it was where something is in between,
like a road.
MS. F ABACHER: That's a very good catch. I saw that myself.
But unfortunately we hadn't vetted that out.
Perhaps the solution might be when we have the LDC reviewed
by the consultant that's going to come in, that we ask him to look at
this definition.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That would probably be a better idea.
MS. FABACHER: Okay. Then we'll just --
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Until now then, we'll put
abutting?
MS. FABACHER: We'll just leave it as it is. We'll just -- I think
that's the direction I got, unless it's something else.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I just brought it up.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think that Mr. Murray's comment,
though, ought to be brought up to that consultant as well.
MS. FABACHER: Absolutely, I agree.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That would be a better way to handle
this one.
MS. F ABACHER: No, I agree with what Mr. Murray says, too.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So on 73, we're -- Page, 73, which
is we're just recommending not to change it.
Page 124
16'/ A
h
.
November 28, 2007
MR. KLATZKOW: Withdraw.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Withdraw.
MS. FABACHER: We'll withdraw, okay.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Do you need a formal motion on that?
MR. KLATZKOW: Yeah, that would be easier.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. This is Section 1.08.02,
Definitions. We're looking for a formal motion to withdraw.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I'll make the motion.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Made by Mr. Murray, seconded by--
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Second.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- Mr. Midney.
All in favor, signify by saying aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Anybody opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries.
MS. FABACHER: Thank you. The next one we will do is to
expand the definition ofTDR credit. That's going to be on Page 75,
and that will be Section -- for the record, that will be in the definition
section 1.08.02.
And I think it was just a -- it's just a clarification. Page 75. It just
references you to the exact section that talks about TDRs in the code
itself, instead of -- before it was just 2.03.07, which you know is an
immense section that has all the overlays and all the zoning districts.
So this just puts you to your correct subsection. Otherwise you could
hunt for hours looking for a TDR.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Catherine, after the word unit, it says a
Page 125
o
- .., ,_.
'<,
November 28, 2007
unit representing the right to. And I'm not sure in all cases it will
represent the right to if they're trying to apply in a manner that's
inconsistent with its use. And I'm wondering, maybe we could say a
unit that may be used to increase the density or intensity of a
development --
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Or a unit representing the
opportunity. Well, whatever.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Either way.
MS. FABACHER: We could -- perhaps we should maybe hold
this one until Joe Thompson comes, because he has a bunch on the
next meeting, on the TDR program. So perhaps we can discuss that
with him.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, I have no problem with that--
MS. F ABACHER: Because he's the TDR expert.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Put it off till the 12th then.
MS. FABACHER: I'm going to move to Page 89. And this is
going to be Section 2.03.08, Rural Fringe Zoning Districts.
And it's simply removing a duplication in the text. Same phrase
appears twice. You can see on Page 90, facilities for the collection
transfer. It's just in there twice. So we remove that.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any discussion from the planning
commission?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I make amotion.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made by Commissioner Murray
to recommend approval ofLDC Sections 2.03.08.A.3.A, paren 3.H,
and 2.03.08 paren three, paren one.
Is there a second?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: I'll second.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Seconded by Mr. Midney. Any
discussion?
All in favor, signify by saying aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
Page 126
16 I j:j
r
t
November 28, 2007
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Anybody opposed.
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries.
Next one, Ms. Fabacher.
MS. FABACHER: Well, I think we could go back. I don't have
the staff here, but there's some pretty simple ones.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Boy, are you an optimist.
MS. FABACHER: Well, I'm looking at Page 1, which is Section
1.08.02, Definitions Development Order. And it's from the compo
planning department. And they're requesting that we add SRA into the
definition, Stewardship Receiving Area.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Any questions from the planning
commission?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Move to approve.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. Mr. Schiffer.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The concept of a development
order, does that trigger anything, I mean, an impact fee due or
anything like that? When you called changing something into a
stewardship receiving area, would that trigger anything that we're not
predicting here?
MR. KLATZKOW: I've got to tell you, the establishment ofa
stewardship receiving area in my mind is a development order
anyway. I don't think we're adding anything here.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Just clarifying, possibly.
MR. KLATZKOW: We're just clarifying. In my mind, it is. It
does have ramifications.
MS. F ABACHER: I think in general they're trying to. It's like in
Page 127
,...
A L~
November 28, 2007
f
c.'l,-,
a variation of a PUD. And it's not really addressed. And I think there's
some other amendments later on that -- next cycle that we'll be pulling
that into monitoring programs and so forth.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: My only concern was are we --
is there an unpredictable trigger that we're pulling here. I'm fine, let's
go ahead.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other questions from the planning
commission?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, hearing none, is there a
recommendation to approve LDC Section 1.08.02?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I had made the recommendation.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Mr. Murray's made the
recommendation. Is there a second?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: (Indicating.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney seconded. Any discussion?
All in favor, signify by saying aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Anybody opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries.
Next one.
MS. F ABACHER: All right.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Pick an easy one.
MS. F ABACHER: I'm just personally going through the book to
see what we haven't covered here.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Fabacher, while you're doing that, I
Page 128
16 I ,/, ,(~t
November 28, 2007
note, before I forget, we're scheduled for the 12th in this room. Would
you see ifthere's any openings for any other night or afternoon for this
room, or even morning for that matter, either three hours or four
hours, to schedule a follow-up meeting in case we can't finish that
evenmg.
MS. F ABACHER: Okay, I sure will. Actually, I don't think there
are anymore amendments that I would want to discuss without staff.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: How about--
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Mr. Klatzkow's document?
MS. F ABACHER: Well, we can discuss it, if you want to discuss
it.
We were planning to discuss that all at one time with -- it's on
Page 59. We were going to discuss that at the same time with the other
amendments that are kind of trailing along with it. But we can
absolutely go to that discussion.
So we are looking at Section 10.02.03 on Page 59 in your book,
Submittal Requirements for Site Development Plans. I think you all
are pretty familiar with this one.
MR. KLA TZKOW: And my recommendation, quite frankly,
would be that E be put into the noise ordinance, not in the LDC. But I
wanted to do it this approach, because I wanted your input on this.
And you wouldn't normally see an amendment to the noise ordinance.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer had first call, then Mr.
Murray.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: A concern I had is that since our
next meeting is in the evening, and since this doesn't address what to
do with existing problems, I was just wondering, maybe it would be
healthier to do it in the evening.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think that would be more fair. Then we
can at least say we've aired it as much as we can in the public. Why
don't we try that.
Page 129
_~ ,.;.c.., IT ,;J... ., i'!4
~.. ..~ t' ~ 8.f
November 28, 2007
I know there was an attorney, wasn't it Clay Brooker who was --
or somebody was in the audience.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Chris --
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well, Clay was in--
MR. KLATZKOW: Well, Clay represents Pebblebrook and
Stevie Tomatoes, so --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. As a courtesy, since we do know
that there's someone interested in this, couldn't we at least notify them
that we will be hearing this then on the 12th, and that way they have
the opportunity if they want to be to participate.
Having that said, is there any others that we can do today or we rather
defer till the 12th?
MS. F ABACHER: I'd rather wait till the 12th.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: If doing so, it's important that we look
for alternative back-up dates to the 12th as well.
MS. FABACHER: Understood.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Klatzkow, did you want to say
something?
MR. KLA TZKOW: No, sir.
MS. FABACHER: We're going to -- to get your direction, we're
going to continue this hearing to December -- I'm sorry, November
12th at 5:05 p.m. in this chamber.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, we're going to -- I'm looking for a
motion to continue this meeting to December 12th at 5:05 in these
chambers.
MS. F ABACHER: Okay, thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is there such a motion?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Moved.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: (Indicating.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray, seconded had by Mr.
Vigliotti.
All in favor, signify by saying aye.
Page 130
f' i A b
November 28, 2007
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Anybody opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries. And we are done until
then. Thank you.
*****
There being no further business for the good of the County, the
meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 12:35 p.m.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
J;\J:CtAk (l ~k,)~
MA "P. STRA , Chairman
These minutes approved by the Board on \ - II - 0 <i(
as presented v/ or as corrected
,
TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY
COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC. BY CHERIE'
NOTTINGHAM.
Page 131
R'-'''',.-'. !1=D """6 fA 4
\C'..c'Li\ '.., ~ J l
F t ;100B December 6, 2007
'.\();3I,:i ~;f (-'Ui.,'J~!V '>Y!~i':<'\<::joners
TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THEQit -if
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMlMlSSI . " -
/';',J _
N 1 Fl 'd Ha\::lS .,"
ap es,. on a He~nlllg
December 6,2007 Coyle. e.... '
<:::oletta -----
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning
Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted
business herein, met on this date at 8:30 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION
in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida,
with the following members present:
CHAIRMAN:
Mark Strain
Lindy Adelstein
Donna Reed-Caron
Tor Kolflat (Excused)
Paul Midney
Bob Murray
Brad Schiffer
Robert Vigliotti (Excused)
ALSO PRESENT:
Jeffrey Klatzkow, Chief Asst. County Attorney
Marjorie Student-Stirling, Assistant County Attorney
Joseph Schmitt, CDES Director ,11.P I A Ii
Ray Bellows, Zoning & Land Developmenrlltg~~w
Date
!tem#:
Page 1
Copies to
lb I A
,
4
December 6, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good morning, everyone. Welcome to
the December 6th meeting of the Collier County Planning
Commission. If you'll all please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance.
(Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.)
Item #2
ROLL CALL
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, will the secretary please take the
roll call.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Kolflat is absent.
Mr. Schiffer?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'm here.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Midney?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Here.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Ms. Caron is here. Mr. Strain?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Here.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Adelstein?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Here.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Murray?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Here.
COMMISSIONER CARON: And Mr. Vigliotti is absent.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, Mr. Kolflat and Mr. Vigliotti
both notified me, they have personal things they had to take care of
today, so they won't be here. They are excused absences.
Item #3
ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA
We'll move on to the addenda to the agenda. And I want to
Page 2
16 I A ,f ,
December 6~007
remind everyone that next Wednesday night at 5 :05 we have an LDC
continuing meeting from our last time on the LDC Cycle 2.
Is everybody here planning to be there next Wednesday night?
Anybody knowing they're not going to be?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: (Indicating.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney, you're not going to be?
I know that the others, Mr. Vigliotti and Mr. Kolflat, I think,
indicated they previously would be here, so we'll have a quorum.
The following morning on the 13th at 8:30 this panel was
requested to review a settlement agreement on the Bert Harris claim
for Cocohatchee. So that meeting will start at 8:30. It will not go past
1 :00 for sure, but more than likely noon, because this meeting room is
taken up at 1 :00 by other groups. So for scheduling purposes I want to
let you all know.
Anybody here not going to be at the meeting next Thursday at
8:30?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good, we'll have a quorum that day.
Now, on the 14th we have an option. The 12th, on the LDC
meeting -- I would hope we could finish the LDC issues up on the
12th. Ifwe can't, this room is available -- the only other day it's
available is the 14th for the month of December, and I believe it was
like at 1 :00 in the afternoon. I'm hoping we wouldn't need it, but we
may need it as a clean-up day.
Ifwe can't do it on the 14th of December, we'd have to finish the
LDC cycle sometime in January, which keeps pushing it behind
schedule. It should have been done earlier this year, to be honest with
you.
I'd like to ask, if we have to go to the 14th, does anybody here
know they cannot make it on the 14th?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I will not be able.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You cannot be here? So there's a
Page 3
1 ~eLm1er 6~007
potential we could have it.
And the other option is, depending on what our 20th agenda is
like and how much of the LDC cycle we'd have to continue, we might
consider doing it late on the 20th. Although I'm not sure, because of
the time frames and the schedule on the 20th at this point.
At this point I'll ask staffto reserve the 14th meeting room,
pending confirmation of a quorum on the 12th.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: At what date and time?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: 1 :00 in the afternoon. Yeah, it would be
an afternoon meeting.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay, glad I heard that.
Item #4
PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, planning commission absences.
We just went over that.
I asked -- staff asked to discuss with us a potential meeting date
in December of 2008. They're planning ahead. So we stuck it under
this particular item, because it seemed the most convenient to be done.
Is planning staff here? Yes.
MR. STANDRIDGE: Good morning, Commissioners, Noah
Standridge for the record. I'm a Senior Planner in Comprehensive
Planning and currently shepherding the rural land stewardship five
area reVIew.
We anticipate that process to be finishing up in October or
November of next year and we would like and ask to come before you
on one of two dates, December 1 st or December 15th, to give a
presentation on the outcome of that process, and also to review the
information and recommendations of that committee.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are you asking these dates because
Page 4
"II'h , ," ~
'/ .. i.'
d~U 1 .t
December 6, 007
those are the only days in December this room is open?
MR. STANDRIDGE: Yes.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The reason -- both of those are a
Monday. And they're both a Monday prior to a Thursday regular
meeting of ours. Generally the weekends prior to our Thursday
meetings we try to prep for those Thursday meetings.
I know you're going to be presenting us with a review of the
RLSA or the Eastern Lands Study Committee. I can personally tell
you I have multiple pages of corrections I believe that the program
may need. And I think just getting through those is going to be a
lengthy process, plus the study to understand those issues before the
Monday meeting will take time.
I don't know how much data your group plans to give us. I
would assume they're going to be looking at the program in depth,
because there are a lot of issues there.
MR. STANDRIDGE: Well, we are not planning on reevaluating
the entire program. This is a, may I say, tweaking of the program,
looking at areas that can be strengthened.
But currently as it exists the committee is looking to see if it has
been successful in its implementation to meet the four goals outlined
in the Growth Management Plan.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are you also looking to see if it's overly
successful?
MR. STANDRIDGE: Overly successful?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes.
MR. STANDRIDGE: Of course.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Being that it's on a Monday, is
there any other -- are your committee's findings not going to be
available till what month, November, December?
MR. STANDRIDGE: I plan on finalizing two reports, one that
will be the technical review, the status to date of the program, with
numbers and acreages of how much landowner participation has
Page 5
16:"""'.'.71 "
ii,
(j
December 6, 2007
occurred. That report will be finalized in March and April and will be
coming before you in April during your regular hearing meetings to
present that information.
Following that, there will be a second report which will come
before you December 1st. That will be finalized October or November
of2008. And that information can be made available to you well
before your regular -- the hearing dates that we're requesting.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, based on that, if the committee
agrees, I think the December 1 st date might be better for us, because if
we could get the information early, we'd have from November 20th,
which is our third Thursday meeting in November, all the way to that
first Monday of December to at least have the paperwork and fit it in.
That's more time frame for us.
Does that work for everybody?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Good sense.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let's shoot for December 1st then.
MR. STANDRIDGE: Thank you very much, Commissioners.
COMMISSIONER MURRA Y: December 1 st?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: December 1 st.
Well, we'll probably start at 8:30 in the morning.
Item #5
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - OCTOBER 15,2007, AUIR
MEETING; OCTOBER 16,2007, AUIR MEETING; OCTOBER 18,
2007, REGULAR MEETING: OCTOBER 18,2007, LDC MEETING
Okay, approval of minutes. We have four sets of minutes that
came with this package. The first one is October 15th and it's the
AUIR meeting. Is there a recommendation for approval?
Commissioner Adelstein, you're usually willing to do that.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: (Indicating.)
Page 6
16/ 14 4
December 6, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Commissioner Adelstein made the
motion.
Seconded by?
COMMISSIONER CARON: I'll second.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Commissioner Caron.
All those in favor, signify by saying aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Anybody opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries.
The next one is October 16th, again the AUIR meeting.
Motion to approve made by?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: (Indicating.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Commissioner Adelstein. Seconded by?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Second.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Commissioner Caron.
Any discussion?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All those in favor, signify by saying
aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Anybody opposed?
Page 7
.; f:J"
I, . . /.1
di, " H Ls
Decembed5, 2007
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries.
October 18th is our regular meeting. Is there a motion to
approve?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: So moved.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Commissioner Adelstein again.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Second.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Commissioner Caron again.
All in favor, signify by saying aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
The last one is October 18th. Motion to approve?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: So moved.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein, followed by?
COMMISSIONER CARON: (Indicating.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Commissioner Caron.
All in favor, signify by saying aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Any opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries.
I guess it goes to show you how well the minutes are taken by
our court recorder that we don't have corrections to them, because she
Page 8
16 Lecibe!t, 2007
does a good job. So thank you, Cherie'.
Item #6
BCC REPORT - RECAPS
BCC report, Ray?
MR. BELLOWS: Yes, the Board of County Commissioners met
on November 27th and they heard the conditional use for the model--
American Dream Builders model home. The Board of County
Commissioners approved that 5-0.
They also approved the PUD rezone for Gaspar Station. That
was approved 5-0.
And on the summary extension they approved the PUD
extension for Sierra Meadows and the parking exemption for the
Naples Big Cypress Marketplace.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ray, when these approvals happen,
would it be possible to add to your report whether or not they accepted
our recommendations and things like that?
Only because if there are recommendations that we make that
they don't like, it would be good to know perception-wise where
they're seeing those as they review them.
MR. BELLOWS: Sure, I think that's not going to be a problem.
On the American Dream Builders model home, I do have a note
here that the Board of County Commissioners did direct staff to bring
back a GMP and LDC amendment to address the model homes in the
Golden Gate Estates pursuant to your recommendation about model
homes along 951.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, I hope that they understood
that that particular model home didn't have any neighborhood
complaints. There was a lot of particulars with that effort that were
more in line with community standards than some of the others that
Page 9
i1 f. A
",-to . l~ ~
December '6, 2007
have tried to come before us and get approval.
MR. BELLOWS: Yeah, and it's just going to be -- staffwill
bring back recommendations.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Would staff have the stakeholders
involved in that process, meaning I hope you would at least -- there's
one or two civic groups in the Estates that participated heavily in the
model homes, the Oakes advisory group being one and the Golden
Gate Civic Association being the other.
It certainly would be good to have their input on that GMP
amendment since they're the ones that helped develop the original
Growth Management Plan language.
MR. BELLOWS: Yeah, I'm sure that will be the case. I'm not
going to speak for comprehensive planning, but for the Land
Development Code we definitely will get those --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The GMP is the issue.
MR. BELLOWS: Yes. Well, I will relay that information to
them.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, Ray.
Chairman's report. I think I've said enough.
Item #8A
PETITION: PUDZ-2003-AR-360L NEW HOPE MINISTRIES
Advertised public hearings. We'll go straight into our hearings at
this point. There was a change in the schedule, you all should have a
revised two schedule. The boat dock was moved to the last position
and the first two positions were moved -- last two were moved
forward to accommodate some issues that we had to have for
scheduling of others, staff.
The Petition PUDZ-2003-AR-3601, New Hope Ministries,
represented by Tim Hancock, will be the first item up today.
Page 10
161 A 4
December 6, 2007
And all those wishing to testify on behalf of this petition, please
rise to be sworn in by the court reporter.
(All speakers were duly sworn.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there disclosures on the part of the
planning commission?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I had communication with Mr. Hancock
regarding some additional data needed for the transportation
documentation that was supplied to us. I also talked with Nick about
it, and he will be discussing my concerns here today.
So with that, let's move forward. Mr. Hancock.
MR. HANCOCK: Good morning, Mr. Chairman, remaining
members of the planning commission this morning.
Also with us today is -- I'm sorry, for the record, Tim Hancock
with Davidson Engineering.
With us today with New Hope Ministries is Pastor Grant
Thigpen, also Mr. Pete Smith. Part of our project team here this
morning, Mr. Gavin Gillette, who is here to address any concerns with
water management design. Mr. Andrew Roth, also with Davidson
Engineering, to discuss any elements of the traffic impact statement,
and Mr. Jeremy Sterk, also with Davidson Engineering, to answer any
questions you may have on the environmental aspects of this petition.
By way of overview, the proposed project combines two parcels
totaling 39.89 acres, which consist of the existing church site as you
can see on the visualizer, which is the gray rectangle on the right of
the two. That site is nearly 21 acres and immediately -- lies
immediately east of the Neapolitan Park PUD, which is the gray
rectangle on the left of the two. And that project is 18.99 acres.
The proposed rezone seeks to simply expand the existing church
facility and uses to include the Neapolitan Park PUD parcel. That
parcel's currently zoned for mixed use and allows for up to 150,000
square feet of office, up to 38,125 square feet of additional
Page 11
1 ..,
~61 i; 4'
December 6, 2007
commercial, and 81 multi-family units.
While I think it's well understood that even a large church will
produce fewer daily peak hour trips on the local roads than a 19-acre
commercial and residential mixed use project, as Mr. Strain pointed
out in a conversation we had, that analysis was not specifically
included in your packet and available for your review.
To that end, what I'd like to provide you for your consideration
on that aspect is that our traffic impact statement treated the project as
if the current land were unzoned. In other words, we're starting from
scratch, and here's what our added trips would be based on the
expansion of the facility. And so everything you see in your TIS is
based on that premise.
However, when you compare what's in the TIS against the table
before you, what we did is we took the existing uses in the Neapolitan
Park PUD and we placed them into a table using the most constrained
movement, as your transportation staff requires, which is typically
your p.m. peak hour movement.
To that end, by way of comparison, the 19 acres of the
Neapolitan Park PUD at build-out would produce 412 p.m. peak hour
trips. We also in this number did account for what would normally be
a pass-by reduction, as well as an internal capture. So we -- that
number's already been lowered by using those two tools.
So it's not a worst case scenario, it's something your
transportation staff -- very similar to what they would see if you were
to submit a TIS for the project under its current land uses.
This 412 p.m. peak hour trips compares very favorably to a
weekday p.m. peak hour trip generation contained in your TIS of 93
trips for the church. Again, an apples to apples comparison of 93 p.m.
peak hour weekday trips to 412 p.m. peak hour trips under the current
zoned land uses.
We all recognize that churches don't put most of their traffic out
there between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. The church
J, A 4
December 6, 2007
will have a significant amount of traffic for a short period, particularly
on Sundays, but measures such as traffic control being provided by the
church through the Florida Highway Patrol has been in place and will
continue to be in place into the future to address Sunday morning
flows.
The project as proposed will generate fewer trips during those
weekday peak hours on the adjacent roadways and achieve dispersion
through providing access to and through the adjacent Dolphin Plaza
project, which is currently under SDP review by Collier County.
Because the county aerials were flown in January, and the
Dolphin Plaza project, which is on top of this aerial, the cleared area
there, with the exception of the gas station on the corner, was cleared
subsequent to that, the church went for an afternoon flight and took
these pictures.
What you see here at the bottom of the picture is the existing
New Hope campus. That large rectangular squared area is the existing
campus.
To the upper portion of the photograph moving to the west is the
Neapolitan Park PUD, which is the wooded section, which is -- again,
it goes from front to back, left to right. The existing wooded section
behind the church is a part of their current campus.
As you go again to the north, what you have is the Dolphin
Plaza. The Dolphin Plaza has an existing developed gas station at the
corner there of Santa Barbara and Davis.
What the church has proposed and what is currently under SDP
review by Collier County is an interconnection from the northwest, or
as you look at it the upper right wooded section there, an
interconnection between our project and the Dolphin Plaza project.
That same connection is evident on the site development plans that
have been submitted to Collier County for Dolphin Plaza.
We've also provided staff with a copy of a letter [rom Dolphin
Plaza agreeing to continue to work with the church to ensure that
Page 13
1 6 I At ~" t
December 63007
interconnection occurs.
More importantly, your staffhas got us both at SDP and we're
not going to exit that particular process without making that
interconnection happen, neither one of us.
So the project, from a traffic dispersal pattern, will not just put
its traffic onto Davis Boulevard as it does today, but will have use of
Santa Barbara through the Dolphin Plaza project. So the project will
be accessing two major arterial roadways.
We believe the staff report correctly addresses issues of
compatibility and consistency with applicable sections of the Land
Development Code and the Growth Management Plan, with one
exception, which I expect will be the focus of much of our discussion
today, and that centers around water management and preserves.
Mr. Chairman, I've briefly hit on some traffic issues, which
you've raised in a conversation with me. Is it your pleasure to address
the transportation issues now and then focus on what I believe is the
one remaining issue, or go ahead and complete the presentation and
address all at the end?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think you ought to -- Tim, there's a lot
more than traffic as far as clarification goes. And normally, if you'll
complete your presentation, we'll just start with the questioning and
work our way through. Maybe what the best thing we could do is save
transportation to last so Nick can then come up and address all that
collectively.
MR. HANCOCK: Yes, sir. We'll proceed.
The staff recommendation of approval includes a stipulation that
stormwater management not be allowed in preserves for this project.
The basis for this, as stated in your staff report, is that the
environmental staff is of the opinion that the project is not consistent
with Policy 6.1.1, paren (5)(b), which states the receipt of treated
stormwater discharge or such use, including conveyance, treatment
and discharge structures, does not result in adverse impacts to the
Page 14
161 Ai'4-
December 6, 2007
naturally occurring native vegetation to include the loss of the
minimum required vegetation and the harm to any listed species
according to the policies associated with Objective 7.1 as determined
by criteria set forth in Land Development Code regulations.
Discharge to preserve having wetlands requires treatment that
will meet water quality standards as set forth in Chapter 63-302 F AC,
and will conform to the water quality criteria requirements set forth by
the South Florida Water Management District.
In short, it's kind of a do-no-harm statement. If you're going to
put stormwater management in the preserves, staff wants to be
comfortable that such use of those preserves will not adversely affect
the native vegetation.
The difficulty comes in when you look at that statement, there's
a line that says as determined by criteria set forth in the Land
Development regulations. I think this body is all too aware that the last
attempt to actually create a change in the Land Development
regulations that addresses this issue specifically resulted in no action
by the board.
The EAC was on one path and I believe this body had their
recommendations, and the BCC determined that it needed either more
study or more time. And so nothing was implemented in the Land
Development Code as a benchmark, if you will, that a project would
have to meet in order for this standard to clearly be shown than it's
met.
The basis in the staff report really has three elements to it for
their recommendations: Number one is the staffs opinion that
directing stormwater to be retained in the proposed upland preserves
will disrupt the natural hydroperiod balance.
Number two, that the proposed preserve is mostly underlain by
well-drained, non hydric soils.
And three, that directing stormwater runoff to the proposed
upland preserves can result in changes to the nutrient and sediment
Page 15
16'" A'"
b ';"
," ~'i"
ecember 6, 2007
loads.
Through the course of this application, which as you know from
the AR number has been going on for some time, we've provided the
staff with a variety of reports and analysis.
The first thing we were asked to do is a Harper analysis. A
Harper analysis is when you're impacting five or more acres of
wetlands, the District typically will request one, and the county staff
has come now to request one whether the District wants it or not.
The focus of a Harper analysis is to address if the project's water
management design will adequately reduce the nutrient loading from
development so that the post-development nutrient-loading discharge
or the discharge from the project has a lesser degree or an equal
degree of nutrient loading as predevelopment.
We did that analysis. We provided it. We answered some
questions. In the end the Harper analysis was accepted and the project
water management design will achieve that objective. The
downstream nutrient loading will not be worse post-development than
it is predevelopment.
We were then asked to calculate what kind of storm event it
would take for water even to enter the preserves. Let me explain the
stormwater management design as simply as I can.
There is an area of dry detention that all the stormwater goes
into. That dry detention achieves the pretreatment of that storm water,
per Water Management District standards. That water then enters a
lake on the property. The purpose ofthe lake primarily, it does
provide additional treatment, but it primarily provides for quantity or
storage.
When that lake rises to a certain level during peak events, the
water will seep back into the existing preserves, and then as the water
levels fall that water will seep back toward the lake and eventually
discharge from the site. And the term that Mr. Lorenz coined was pop
off. When do we get to that point that water pops off into that
Page 16
161 A 4
December 6, 2007
preserve? The water, other than the ground water elevation itself, will
rise and move into the preserve.
We looked at that, we modeled the system. And what we came
up with is if you have a four-inch rainfall in 24 hours, the system will
allow water to basically seep back into the preserves.
Over the course of 12 years of data there were only a handful of
times you had four inches of rain in a 24-hour period. We submitted
that information.
What we got back was, well, okay, that's not a lot, but what
about successive events? What about in a typical year, what if you
have one amount of rainfall one day and two more days of two or
three or four inches on those days, what happens then?
We went back and basically pulled 12 years of rainfall data. We
analyzed the 12 years, determined what we thought was the year just
above the median. In other words, an average rainfall year, let's take
that next year up and let's model a 30-day window, the wettest month
of that year.
We started at control elevation, which means our control, which
is 9.5, is almost like a glass table in the wet season. When you pour
water on it it's going to do one of two things: It's going to run off or it's
going to stack up.
So assuming we started at wet season water table, which is the
average high, we modeled 30 days. We took the rainfall events, real
time rainfall events and plugged them into the system day after day
after day after day for 30 days.
And what we were able to show is, in that 30-day window the
system achieved full recovery, which means that -- full recovery is
defined by when you have a major event, a 25-year storm event, over
the course of 15 days the system fully recovers. In other words, the
water elevation is back down at that 9.5 control.
There were no successive events that allowed water to stage in
the preserves to any great degree. And more importantly, throughout
Page 17
~! ,
d!i.'- '41
15'" '" I:
, :r,' It" r. 'j
t, 1 ~,,'
I!l,. i l.J
, December 6, 2007
that 30 days, the majority of those days water was not even in the
preserves.
Our control elevation for this site is 9.5 feet. Our natural grade is
between 10 and 10-and-a-half. You'd have to have the water table
elevated six inches or more over the seasonal high to even have water
in your preserves. We provided that information to staff.
And before the EAC, the staff looked at that average year, and
Mr. Lorenz testified that there appeared to be in a given year only
eight or nine times in which water would enter the preserves. Over the
course ofthose 12 years, there were single events in the number of 15
to 20 that may have allowed it to happen.
We felt that information was pretty good. It spoke well of the
design. It spoke of the fact that any water being put back in the
preserves was short term, short duration, and minimal effect.
The EAC agreed with us and recommended approval 5-1.
I'll be candid, though, one of their elements of recommendation
was gee, you haven't given these guys a standard. Every time you ask
them to model something and they do, you ask for more modeling.
Well, that wasn't the end of it. The staff asked for modeling, and
we provided it. We modeled in addition to the 25-year, three-day
event which we had already provided, we provided the requested
10-year event and the five-year event. The result of that additional
modeling was the same recommendation.
And folks, I think what we're dealing with is not -- we don't want
to become the test case. But we have become the de facto test case for
water management in preserves.
Is there a level at which it's acceptable? We don't have that
mark. We believe we've met it.
We believe through proper design our water is pre-treated in dry
pretreatment to a commercial -- exceeding a commercial standard
before it ever goes into our lake. Then it sits in the lake, receives
additional pretreatment before it ever discharges into the preserve.
Page 18
JIIfI' A
16/ 4"
December 6, 2007
And it only discharges in the preserve in peak events for short
durations.
The fact that our EIS states that an increased hydroperiod will be
beneficial to the preserves, we still have a recommendation of denial --
I'm sorry, recommendation of approval with a stipulation that we
cannot discharge into the preserves.
I believe what we have is a philosophical issue, not an issue
based on analysis. That's difficult for me to stand here and deal with.
But let me boil it down to what I think is the actual question we need
to answer with respect to this project.
It is my sincere hope this body hopefully takes one of two
actions today. The one is to approve staff recommendation with the
stipulation. That's obviously our second choice, that we not discharge
into the preserves.
The second is to approve the project or recommend approval
with the fact that the project has shown as designed that it does not
represent adverse impacts to the preserve.
To that end, you're looking at two options. We've given you the
information on option one, and let me try and make it as simple as I
can. The way we've designed the system, that preserve is connected to
our water management system. And the staff sees that as a negative
because it allows for water to build up in the stormwater system and
move back into the preserves.
We candidly think the opposite is true. If we disconnect that
system from the water management system, if we leave that preserve
as it is today, we all know the first thing we do when we build in
Southwest Florida is we elevate the site. Preserves end up being
encased, if you will, in two to three feet of fill. That preserve will
become a bathtub with no outlet. Peak rainfall events as a result will
stand in that preserve and they will stage not higher but longer.
The only benchmark we've been given is a study by Mike
Duever with the South Florida Water Management District. And I'm
Page 19
161 A 4-
December 6, 2007
sure staffwill share that study with you. We're dealing with what's
called a mesic flatwoods. And in Mike's report, he says mesic
flatwoods, which are one step away from a hydric flatwood, can
accept inundation on average for up to two inches over a 30-day
period. None of our models show that this system will be inundated
for greater than 30 days for more than two inches.
I spoke with Mike last week and he went a half step further. That
model is not intended to be a snapshot in time but over a six to 10-year
window.
We believe we have shown that not only do we have a good
design, but if you take Mike Duever's report, where the idea is if you
get over two inches of staging in that area for 30 days or more, you
begin to transition from mesic flatwoods to hydric. Our system does
not do that. The model shows that's not what will happen.
We've met the only standard we've been given. And I think the
alternative is to create a bathtub around the preserve which will
actually cause longer inundation.
So my request to you is we're not asking you to set policy, but I
do want you to take a look at the aerial in front of you, and right
where my pen points, you'll see a strip of green. I know it's difficult to
see on this aerial, but I want to point out that we have a case study of
exactly what we're asking you to approve. It's on-site.
Ten years ago this project was approved by the South Florida
Water Management District. At that time churches were not held to a
commercial standard. Water did not have to be pre-treated prior to
discharging into preserves. Our existing storm water management
system takes the church and the parking lot and discharges the water
through sheet flow into an existing preserve, which is mesic pine
flatwoods.
For nine years this has been going on. We're happy to put
lengthy testimony on, but we don't think it's necessary. That area is
doing well. There's a very simple, and I know, Mr. Strain, you've seen
Page 20
16-'
,~
,
n
"
"."(
December 6, 2007
this, if you go out to cattle lands where you get a lot of standing water
over time, the saw palmetto will get what we call leggy . All of a
sudden the branches on the bottom will die off and it almost looks like
it's trying to step out ofthe water. You'd think after nine years some of
that might be going on if this was being transitioned from mesic to
hydric. That's not evident in any way.
Admittedly, there are three or four pine trees in here that are
stressed. I can take you out to the middle of the Picayune State Forest
and show you three or four pine trees that are stressed too. There's no
indication -- if everything was being stressed due to water or
inundation, we would see a broader application of that.
My point is that we've done all the studies. We've met or tried to
meet what standards we've been provided in the Mike Duever report.
And we have on this very site a case of a higher degree of inundation
going into a preserve than what we are proposing on the new preserve
in the year.
Folks, we've met the standard. And our request of you today is,
assuming we meet the standards in all other areas that -- on this
particular issue that on this project you determine that in fact what
we're proposing does not represent adverse harm to the preserve.
With that, and that being the key issue, if you have any specific
questions about water management design or the health of the system
out there, Jeremy Sterk, who's the environmentalist with our firm, is
here. His -- Dan Underhill did the EIS in your package. Jeremy's
experience with the site actually pre-dates Dan a little bit. He can
address any questions you might have.
I've chosen just to focus our presentation on the one key issue of
the stipulation, but at this point obviously we'd be pleased to address
any questions or concerns you might have about the balance of the
project.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Questions from the planning
commission?
Page 21
16'1 j~ h
,
December 6, 2007
I would like if we could hold our transportation questions
collectively towards the end and we'll have Nick address all those at
one time. At least I have some, so I'll hold mine.
Mr. Midney?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, the way I read the staff
recommendation is not that the area be made into a bathtub and
completely isolated, they're just talking about full water quality
pretreatment before it would backflow into the preserve. Are you
against --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Paul, that's the wrong -- there's been a
new recommendation issued separately by staff. That was their first
recommendation. If you don't have the second one -- here, I'll give it
to you to read.
MR. HANCOCK: The recommendation you have in your packet
we were fine with, and quite frankly was a little confused when we got
it because didn't match the analysis or the statements in the staff
report.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right after our packet went out, I think
it was after the weekend even, a separate recommendation went forth,
and not all of us who get e-mail on a regular basis may have received
it. And that's why Mr. Midney may not have had it.
MR. HANCOCK: Actually, Mr. Midney, if you want to go back
to the previous recommendation, we're all for it.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That was going to be my question. The
previous recommendation seemed to make sense, especially in lieu of
all the studies that you've done and the fact that you're in an activity
center in an urban area, I was surprised to receive the second
recommendation. But we'll go from there.
Mr. Midney, did you want to follow up with that at all?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: No.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any other questions?
Mr. Murray, then Mr. Schiffer after Mr. Murray.
Page 22
16lA 4
December 6,2007
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Good morning. I'm looking at
the PUD that's extant.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray, could you bring the
microphone.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I'm looking at the section one
statement of compliance, and No.8. I just want to make sure I
understand what there are no conflicts. No.8 reads, the planned unit
development includes extensive open spaces which are preserved --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Bob, I'm sorry -- we'd like to follow
along with you. The statement of compliance in the PUD?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yeah, in the old PUD. This is
the Neapolitan Park planned unit. January, 1990. My apologies.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We were looking at the new one.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I apologize. And I'm on page -- I
guess it's 424. Section one.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you.
MR. HANCOCK: Yes, sir, I'm with you now.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I just want to be clear that we
don't have a conflict in any way.
Under No.8, the planned unit development includes extensive
open spaces which are preserved from future development in order to
enhance their natural functions and to serve as a project amenity.
It's that's a statement that's -- although it's intended to be
specific, I think it's more general than I'd like it relative to what you're
currently relating. Because I'm trying to differentiate, do we lose any
of these open spaces as a result of this new program?
MR. HANCOCK: To answer that question, I'll refer you to the
next to last page of Ordinance 90-06, that same document you're
looking at, which is the conceptual PUD master plan for the
Neapolitan Park PUD.
And if you take a look at what -- it's a little tough to see because
it's obviously a scanned -- but if you'll note the size ofthe preserve.
Page 23
Ii.. 1 f~1 "
LtJi t~ 4
December 6, 2007
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I just want to get there, if you
give me a second.
MR. HANCOCK: And the pages are numbered by OR book to
37, then Page 444, then it's the very next page.
COMMISSIONER MURRA Y: Well, I just lost my page.
Anyway, go ahead, sir.
MR. HANCOCK: If you look at the PUD master plan, obviously
compliance statement No.8 is intended to work in concert with the
master plan. The proposed native vegetation that will be retained in
the project exceeds -- if you'll notice that area of preserve on that
master plan?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY : Yes. Well, I'm not sure I can
differentiate -- it's Tract B, I guess, that we're looking at?
MR. HANCOCK: Correct, it's --
COMMISSIONER MURRA Y: One looks like a lake and the
other one might be the -- or are they both preserves?
MR. HANCOCK: No, one is a lake, which provides water
management, the darker of the two. The lighter color is a preserve.
Again, my pen is pointing to the preserve area.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: This needs to be turned on. I
have to look over here. I'll look over here in the meantime.
It's as simple as that, huh. Thank you.
MR. HANCOCK: So the preserve area within the Neapolitan
Park PUD shown on the master plan is actually smaller than what will
be retained on-site through the existing combined PUD.
Furthermore, what was required on the previous conditional use
for the New Hope Ministry site has been increased because the
regulation of the native vegetation requirement since the original
adoption of the conditional use requires more. And the fact that they
left the area to the rear vegetated, it increased our overall.
So when you combine the two projects as currently approved,
the resulting vegetation is more than what those two projects would
Page 24
16 A 4!
December 6, 2007
have had to have done under the current approvals.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: That's interesting. Could you
return to that other photo where you had your pen. While I was
appreciating what you were trying to show us, you showed us what
appeared to be a rather small line of vegetation.
MR. HANCOCK: And I was incorrect. And thank you for
catching me on that. The wider area, which the pen now -- let me get
out of that glare.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: That's a little different.
MR. HANCOCK: Yeah, that looks more like a preserve and less
like a landscape buffer.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yeah. Now it makes a little bit
more sense to me.
And the -- how wide would you say that is? That looks, I would
guess, maybe 35, 40 feet?
MR. HANCOCK: It's actually closer to about 70 feet in width.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: You say there are only a couple
of pines that are stressed?
MR. HANCOCK: There are about 70 pines total in that area, and
there are three or four of them in one small cluster that appear to be
stressed, based on site visits to the site and whatnot. It's not unusual
when one tree gets stressed that you get some boring insects that will
spread out to a couple around it. So it's not terribly disconcerting, but
it does not appear to be anything related to hydrology.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay. Let's see if I have
anything else that's pertinent.
MR. HANCOCK: I do have people far more qualified than I to
make those statements.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Bear with me a second. If! have
anything else that's consequential -- yeah, I have this one I noted, too.
There's a reference in here and I have to find it. It talked -- here. Well,
there's a reference to a 5.12 and there isn't any 5.1 -- Page 8 of the new
Page 25
~.
161
December 6, 2007
planned unit development, the new PUD. Under B, item two. At least
it's not contained in this document that I could find.
MR. HANCOCK: It should read 5.10. When sections were
eliminated from the PUD during the course of review, we failed to
catch that --
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So that's just a scriveners or a
typo?
MR. HANCOCK: That is my fault.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: And I think -- yeah, my note was
a concern I had under Page 4 was internal flooding. I was concerned
with the berm actually creating an internal flooding problem. And not
in the truest sense of flooding, but containment of water that probably
was more -- where are you going to put your water? If you berm it in,
what are you going to do?
MR. HANCOCK: Well, the only berming on-site for water
management areas is going to occur, it's not even going to look like a
berm, it's in essence going to be -- you'll see a flat grass area for
parking and then it will drop off into a dry detention area and that
water is moved through dry detention ultimately back to the lake in
the rear and then it is brought through a system of pipes and swales
back to the front of the property and the ultimate discharge being a
control structure next to the right-of-way on Davis Boulevard.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Well, thank you, sir. Those were
my issues and questions on this for the PUD, thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let the record show Mr. Vigliotti is
here.
And Bob, for your reference, we're on the New Hope Ministries,
and we're just now starting the questions after the presentation.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Thank you. Sorry I'm late,
everyone.
MR. HANCOCK: You didn't miss any of the fireworks, sir.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer, you were next, then Mr.
Page 26
1 [~em1er 6~007
Adelstein.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And my question, I think, is use
of the site and the site planning. What is the educational building?
What is the intent of that?
MR. HANCOCK: It's really a general purpose building, Sunday
school classes and so forth. It's education in association with the
church programs and membership.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Is there a day care on this
grounds?
MR. HANCOCK: No, we do not have day care.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The question is why do you
have that building up front like that? Why wouldn't you push it to the
back? You have a nice axial drive on the future sanctuary. This thing
is going to block that.
MR. HANCOCK: That particular building, as you see on the
PUD master plan what we did is we treated everything at a full
build-out. That particular building doesn't have a set of architectural
plans in the wings waiting to move forward.
And what we're currently proposing, that's in the subsequent
phase. So the likelihood that that building is going to be exactly as
shown, exactly where shown is questionable.
One of the things that you do try and do, though, is that there are
times in which the sanctuary is in use and you have educational uses
that are running concurrent. And I think what it does allow is it allows
you to come onto the campus and access the educational facility
without mixing your parking for those that may be using the
sanctuary .
Can it be moved to the back and be aesthetically nicer or
whatnot? It's possible. But I can tell you that this plan was derived
from thinking ofa couple of years back, and that building may move
in the future.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And the last question, is all this
Page 27
'/flit A ,i
1""1 ',I;';'
-L \-D~cember 6, 2007
parking intended to be paved?
MR. HANCOCK: It is our goal to have as much grass parking
on the site as possible.
I've had discussions with Nicole Ryan at the Conservancy,
because they just recently ran into the same problem with their site.
It's gotten to the point even for churches, you want to do grass parking
but it accounts towards your water management almost as if it were
paved. You get very, very little credit for grass parking because you
have to have stabilized subgrade and limerock under it.
So I've expressed to the Conservancy our desire to work with
them, particular in dealing with not-for-profits in a way to maybe,
maybe improve that, where the required subgrade is not as high so you
get a greater infiltration and you get credit to water management so we
can encourage more grass parking. Our goal is to have as much grass
parking on the site as possible where feasible.
How's that for qualifying?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay, good. Thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Thank you. I have great
respect for your effort. And I'm trying to decide in my own mind how
much larger will this New Hope Ministry become by what we're
doing?
MR. HANCOCK: The proposed sanctuary here, which, due to
the time and expense of this process, the church made the wise
decision to put as big a number in there as they can dream. And we're
talking about a 4,200-seat sanctuary is what we based all of our TIS
information and whatnot on.
The likelihood of getting there on this campus, you know, I don't
know that ultimately all of the ancillary programs that would go with a
membership that high can actually fit on this campus. But we wanted
to maximize that so we didn't have to come back here in two years
because we were off by a thousand.
Page 28
161 A 4;
December 6, 2007
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: That is something that I really
understand and respect. But my problem is, I still know Davis
Boulevard and I know the problem on Davis Boulevard and I can see
what could happen on some of these days in which the traffic will not
be able to flow. And I'm wondering, how are you going to protect
that?
This is a very large street with a very small use availability. And
now we're going to make this much, much larger.
Davis Boulevard maybe is a failed road. There's nothing we can
do about it. And all you're going to do with it now is make it fail faster
and possibly put us into a major problem.
MR. HANCOCK: In response to that, the failure of Davis
Boulevard is a p.m. weekday peak hour failure. It's Monday through
Friday, 4:00 to 6:00 is when it achieves that failed status, if you will.
At build-out, based on 4,200 seats, there's 93 trips in that p.m.
peak hour. The bulk of trips that will apply to this campus will occur
predominantly on a Sunday morning.
In the TIS provided to you, we actually went out and did traffic
counts during the hours of operation of the church on Davis
Boulevard. Right now traffic coming out of the church has two
choices, east or west on Davis. Davis is the only way in, the only way
out.
With the approval of this project and the requirement of the
interconnection, approximately half of our trips will now be heading
to Santa Barbara. And that is going to be a tremendous benefit for
Davis. And that's why I think the number of93 peak hour trips, if you
begin dividing that between Santa Barbara and Davis, it becomes
minuscule.
Will there be some traffic congestion on Sunday mornings?
Absolutely. And all of us that attend a church of any size have dealt
with this. And that's why the church hires the Florida Highway Patrol
to allow for safe ingress and egress of their parishioners.
Page 29
i' p "--II n
, ''',''I iI lif "'if
""l"Q" .,.
December 6, 2007
Because this is an off-peak use, I believe, Commissioner
Adelstein, that the concern over traffic on Davis, the worst thing that
could happen is not rezone this to a church and allow it to become
something that contributes to a higher degree of that weekday p.m.
peak hour. We're off-peak. Ifwe can get more off-peak uses out there,
some of those traffic numbers will look a lot better.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I'm hoping you're thinking the
same way. But the idea is to make sure that it's going to be safe and
usable when it's going to have to be usable.
MR. HANCOCK: I think if we didn't have the access to Santa
Barbara I would probably share your concerns to a greater degree --
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I guarantee that--
MR. HANCOCK: -- but fortunately some of the folks
developing the Dolphin Plaza just happen to be in the congregation on
Sundays, so we've got a good neighbor there.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Thank you.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I've got one more question.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sure, go ahead, Mr. Murray.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: With regard -- if you'd show that
other picture again of the -- I recognize that's the current -- when the
child care, you said you had no child care, and that's fine. But within
the PUD you're asking for the opportunity to provide child care.
MR. HANCOCK: Yes, sir.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So my question would be
relative -- very simple thing. How close, and I can't really make it out
on this master plan, to be honest with you, where would the child care
be relative to those what look to be like residences there? They look
like several story high residences.
MR. HANCOCK: In the next phase of buildings, the only thing
we're actually building in this next phase is -- back by the lake there
was a building that kind of ran east-west?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Could you relate it to that so that
Page 30
1 h J Jj 1. J
'I)ece~ber 6:!'20()7
I get a better orientation and I can try to then relate it to this? Okay,
that far.
MR. HANCOCK: That would be the next building that is firmly
in the building program. Beyond that, quite honestly, we're still a little
bit in the hope, dream and pray a lot phase.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay. So that's -- based on what
you told me earlier is like 70 feet for the preserve area, that's got to be
probably well over 150 feet.
MR. HANCOCK: Yes, the master plan --
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: It's very hard to read this master
plan from my -- it's very --
MR. HANCOCK: You all may remember Ms. Kelly Michelle
Smith, who is with our firm. A wonderful lady , but made the mistake
of giving you way too much detail.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I know.
MR. HANCOCK: She took the SDP plan and submitted it as our
PUD master plan, and it's got way too much stuff on it.
But when you look at this, one of the nice things about the
identification of the preserve area is that we've been able to retain
native vegetation along the perimeter of the boundary everywhere
where we butt up against residential housing, with the exception of, 1
think there's one building immediately to our east that does not look at
the preserve. Everybody else, we're maintaining a strip of preserve
anywhere from 30 to 70 feet around that lake. Then there's a two-acre
lake, then there's a building.
So we feel very comfortable that folks are going to -- when it's
all done and said, would everybody like 10 acres of trees behind
them? Sure. But we think this plan results in the right native
preservation and the right buffering for this condition.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Thank you very much.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any other questions of the
applicant before we ask transportation questions?
Page 31
16 I A it:
December 6, 2057
Ms. Caron?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Hancock, on Page 6 of your
PUD, the new one, the current one.
MR. HANCOCK: Yes, ma'am.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay, question on 3.2(B)(2).
Included here are boat docks. Why would that be?
MR. HANCOCK: Well, with the exception of any type of a
summer program where they might canoe in the lake, you've got me.
COMMISSIONER CARON: I think we can take that out of the
PUD?
MR. HANCOCK: Can we live without boat docks? The kids
will complain, but we'll take it out anyway.
COMMISSIONER CARON: And number three --
MR. HANCOCK: And maybe later you can tell me what you
were getting at, because I understand there's a story there.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Number three includes a bookstore
and a printing shop. So is this for commercial purposes, or is this just
strictly for the church to print their Sunday morning --
MR. HANCOCK: It's to support the church use. Pastor Thigpen
is on tape every Sunday, and there's a lot of recording and production
that goes on and people requesting things from the church and
whatnot.
So one of the concerns we have is these days if you aren't so
inclusive in your PUD and you ask for an interpretation from staff that
it's consistent with what you have, seven months later you're in front
of the county commission asking for a print shop.
So it is to support the church uses, period, it is not a commercial
use.
COMMISSIONER CARON: On Page 9, for your preserve area
plan what are the water management structures that you're talking
about?
MR. HANCOCK: It would strictly be related to an outfall
Page 32
'1l' A 4
~", ,j g
December 6, 2007
structure. As currently designed, we don't have any structures in there,
but if down the road, for example, there was a change in the design,
that's what we would limit it to.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Then I think it should say outfall
structure.
MR. HANCOCK: Okay.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: If you're going to go that far as to define
the structure, you may want to make sure you put in the pipe that leads
to the structure, because the foot of that may end up being into the
structure, and I can see someone mincing words during review that the
pipe isn't allowed but the structure is.
So you might -- I think water management structures covers you
because it's anything that the South Florida Water Management
District basically requires to be good engineering. I'm not sure by
mincing into defining each piece of a structure, if you decide to use an
outfall that might vary in shape or size or use a mitered end or
something like that, then you've got a different kind of structure but
still one that would be reasonable.
COMMISSIONER CARON: The goal was to keep them out of
issues, not to create issues for them. So if everybody is happy with
water management structures --
MR. HANCOCK: It's probably far more limited in actual
application than you may think. There's not too much there --
COMMISSIONER CARON: That's probably the better way to
go.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Could we state water management
structures as required by permitting agencies?
MR. HANCOCK: Yes.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Because you're not going to want to do
more than that anyway, so --
MR. HANCOCK: No, sir, they're kind of expensive.
COMMISSIONER CARON: And on Page 13, vacating the
Page 33
~'fj ,
'11 .'p " IJ.! lip'
If 0'" ' . I t,(
Ce"becember 6, 20af
current conservation easement, is that the conservation easement in
front of your property along Davis? Where is this?
MR. HANCOCK: No, ma'am, that conservation easement, that
preserve area will be retained along the front of the project.
COMMISSIONER CARON: What is the conservation easement
that you're trying to vacate?
MR. HANCOCK: That vacation has already occurred. This
PUD's been in process for a long time. There was a taking that
occurred along Davis Boulevard for right-of-way and drainage, and
there was an alteration in the location and the intended location of the
preserves there. To my knowledge of the current conservation
easements, we're not vacating any of them. So I believe that's holdover
language.
Our goal, Ms. Caron, is basically that what you see meets or
exceeds the county standard, at least for preserve location and type.
The environmental staff has approved it. We just simply -- we're
happy to limit ourselves to what's on the master plan. That may be
holdover language.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay, I'm--
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Do you have any problems striking that
language then?
MR. HANCOCK: I've just been informed by my client that on
the east side there is a narrow strip that the county said is too narrow
to be counted towards the preservation requirements that are in place
today, so we may be vacating that.
However, it's not going to be altered because it's really -- you
know, there's drainage that goes through that area. But that may be the
only area in which we vacate an easement.
As you see on your master plan, though, that area is not culled
out as an easement to meet the county's requirement.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay, can you explain then
exactly where that is? I mean --
Page 34
.,
i ,I " /,':: ~
'~.J " .~ ~~~~.
December 6, 2007
MR. HANCOCK: Going back to the over-information plan, as
you look at the right side of this plan, on the bottom right corner you'll
see that, you know, approximately 70-foot wide preserve area that
we're talking about.
And see how it kind of starts to turn up to the north on the
bottom right corner there? That used to extend up on as a part of our
preserve on that eastern boundary. It's pretty narrow and it's not going
to be part of our preserve plan into the future.
So that would be the only area that I believe that language would
apply to on the current plan.
Our current plan in for SDP review is really not to touch that
area, but we just can't count it as preserves, so why leave a restriction
on it that isn't necessary.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Could you blow that plan up and
specifically show us the easement that the you're considering
vacating?
MR. HANCOCK: Thank you, Mr. Bellows.
Again, lower right-hand corner, you see how it kind of sweeps to
the north a little bit and then the parking area starts? To the right of
that parking area is a narrow strip, and that was part of a conservation
easement that doesn't need to be there anymore.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay. Thank you. I'm good for my
questions in here.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any other questions before we
go into transportation?
Mr. Vigliotti?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'm sorry that I was late. You
might have went over this, this morning before I got here, but where
do you stand on stipulations regarding the water quality?
Sorry .
MR. HANCOCK: I will do my best Reader's Digest version.
We've provided staff with all the information they've requested,
Page 35
., , I A ),
... 0 December6, 2007
we've done countless analyses on it, and there's not a standard that
we're being told we have to meet. And so we are pre-treating all of the
stormwater before it would ever enter the preserve. It will only enter
the preserve on very extreme rainfall events. And my having it
connected to our storm water system, we believe it will exit quicker.
We think it's a better plan than leaving it alone and hemming it in with
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Tim, I think we can shorten this by what
you already suggested, was that the recommendation that was
originally submitted by staff that says the CPUD and master plan
show full water quality pretreatment volume before the water reaches
an elevation that would have the lake overflow its banks and then
backflow into the natural ground area preserves. That one he can live
with.
The new one that came out bye-mail, I know the look on your
face, so that's probably like Mr. Midney, you didn't see it. Another one
came out that said all stormwater shall be prohibited from entering the
preserve shown on the master plan. That one they can't live with.
So they're in agreement with the first one, not in agreement with
the second one.
MR. HANCOCK: Thank you, Mr. Strain, and that is correct.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, does the backflow back
into the preserve? Is that by just natural groundwater seepage or is that
by some sort of plumbing, like pipes?
MR. HANCOCK: No, sir, it's -- between the lake and the
preserve there are no structures as a part of the water management
system. It literally just rises. And because there's a berm around the
lake, portion of the lake that's adjacent to the preserve, the water just
basically seeps back. And as the lake level falls, the water seeps back
toward the lake.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Well, if it's all subterranean,
Page 36
161 r~ i~
December 6, 2007
doesn't that imply that there's not going to be any nutrients, it's just
going to be the natural flow of water?
MR. HANCOCK: To guarantee that there is no nutrient loading
is almost an impossible task --
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: I mean, isn't it considered that if
it's subterranean that you're not talking about nutrients flowing back
and forth?
MR. HANCOCK: That would be correct. And again, because of
the pretreatment factor, that the water's being pretreated before it gets
to the lake and before it gets to the preserve, we believe the statement
that nutrient loading is increased to be erroneous.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, before we get into transportation,
are there any other questions of the applicant?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'm good, thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Tim, if you could, I haven't asked any
questions and I do have a few.
MR. HANCOCK: Yes, sir.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let's start on Page 7, Table 1,
Community Facility Development Standards.
Your maximum height on that table in your PUD, your reference
is 48 feet and three stories. The way we usually do it is three stories
not to exceed 48 feet. Do you have any problem with the correction of
that language?
MR. HANCOCK: No, sir.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Under the requirements where it says
minimum building setbacks, PUD boundary, you have under
accessory use a 10-foot setback. Since most of your buildings are
accessory uses to the main large building, that would potentially put a
huge building right next to some residential areas. Do you have any
objection to a larger setback requirement along residentially-zoned
properties?
Page 37
161 A 1,
December"!, 2007
MR. HANCOCK: I think 25 feet, same as principal, would be
acceptable?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, so PUD boundary, where it abuts
residential, you're saying will do --
MR. HANCOCK: A minimum of 25-foot setback, sir.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm trying to make some of these
changes on notations so we can, in our stipulated motion we can keep
it nice and clean, so --
This project has the potential of a lot of uses that may have
compatibility problems with adjoining residential areas. You're
certainly entitled to the uses you're asking for. However, if you were,
say, sold to a different church, as some churches grow out of their
different areas and move on to others, and some new facility came in
and decided that the uses that are in here mean something different to
them, something greater than what the neighborhood or that this board
or another board may have intended, we have introduced a suggestion
in the code, it hasn't passed yet, but we discussed it with a couple of
other PUDs last week, in implementing noncompatibility language, so
that if a use is interpreted in the future by an applicant in a manner that
seems to be inconsistent to what was intended, staff could request that
that use be rereviewed for potential compatibility uses back before a
board.
I don't know if you're familiar with this language, it was
introduced by Mr. Klatzkow some time ago and it's been working its
way through the system. Your PUD, should it go through now and
prior to that language being instituted, it would basically not fall under
that language or be questionable whether it fell under it.
So I have a copy of that language as it has applied in the last
couple and I was wondering if you have any objection to entering
some noncompatibility language into this PUD for the circumstances
that I just described?
MR. HANCOCK: It I could have the opportunity, as you're
Page 38
16 I 4 !
December 6, 2007
discussing transportation with Mr. Casalanguida, to speak to with Mr.
Klatzkow. My primary concern--
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Here's a copy of it for that purpose,
when you do. And then before we get to the end, I'd like to ask you
your thoughts on it.
What that does is prevent situations like we've had occur in a
couple places in North Naples, one being, as an example, the Stevie
Tomatoes in Pebble brook Plaza incident. So --
MR. HANCOCK: Understood. And because we're not a
commercial site where we have somebody coming in to -- you know,
that was selling property, so to speak, it's lesser of an issue for us.
My concern remains, and I'll discuss this with Mr. Klatzkow, as
-- you know, what constitutes a complaint? Three neighbors who don't
like the church? Are we -- those type of issues. How it ferrets out is
my primary concern for this particular project. But I'll discuss that
with him.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We'll look forward to your comments
before we finish.
On Page 9, your preserve areas. Under 4.2(A)(2), biking, hiking
and nature trails and boardwalks, do you have any concern if we
reference those as being non-paved?
MR. HANCOCK: No, sir. Your EAC LDC subcommittee also is
bringing a recommendation back to you hopefully in the coming
months on that same item.
But no, sir, for this project pervious only would be acceptable. I
assume that does not apply, obviously, to boardwalks.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Elevated non-pervious. No, I'm talking
ground surfaces.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Patent it, you'll be rich for life.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: On your PUD master plan, I have two
problems with the master plan. One is I do not think you really want to
make this your master plan. The fact that you're putting this intensity,
Page 39
1/,./ A'l b
December 6, 2007
and I would have to turn to Marjorie or Jeff or whoever was the
county attorney that reviewed this, this master plan is so detailed, I
would be concerned that you might be back in here every year to
change the movement of a parking space or the -- it's just way beyond
what I think is reasonable in the public record for a master plan.
It is an SDP plan, I certainly agree with you, and that's the
scrutiny that this could entail going through review for one change is
going to be devastating to your applicant.
Ms. Student?
MS. STUDENT-STIRLING: Yes, it would be our opinion that it
should be more conceptual in nature. They typically are.
MR. HANCOCK: With that direction, we'll be happy to modify
it, leaving the uses where they are but taking the detail out of it. We
didn't want to do that in the middle of the process, because we'd go
through 14 reviews. But with your direction, that's only one review, so
we're very happy to do that.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And I think we could stipulate
something that would give us enough assurance that the remaining
plan, say with review by both staff and Margie, would be a plan that
would be something more in line with a conceptual plan that we're
used to seeing, so that we don't have an applicant forced to come back
through the system every few months for a minor change.
MR. HANCOCK: And preserve locations and lake locations will
be unchanged in that plan, basically we're going to remove the parking
detail, primarily. And if there's any water management that's in
addition to this, we'll show it so it's more reflective.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, you have a set of standards in the
LDC that trigger insubstantial and substantial changes. If you were to
use those as a the guideline as the ones needed to be on here, and
anything that doesn't require a substantial change for movement, you
don't need to put it on here. So I think that would be a good way to
approach it.
Page 40
lISt A 4
December 6, 2007
MR. HANCOCK: We appreciate the suggestion and certainly
agree to doing just that.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I have -- and I should have mentioned
this during disclosures, I did speak to the Conservancy, and you
reminded me of that by your reference to them earlier.
Their suggestion, and I happen to agree with it, is that a lot of
these -- and I understand your argument about the grass parking, but
grass parking, while it may not help you in water management
because of the base that still has to be there, it does help in
appearance, a lot of green space and reduces the heat generation from
black asphalt, which is a -- for lack of a better reference, it's a
warming issue that we all need to be aware of. We have way too much
dark asphalt overall.
I would like you to consider limiting your asphalt to aisles only
on that westernmost large parking area and use grass -- with the
exception of those couple of aisles up close to your facility that would
have to be handicapped or more daytime and constant use. But once
you get past the first two aisles, run asphalt in your travel lanes and
leave all your parking spaces grass.
Do you have any concerns with that?
I know the base issue, I know the sod issue. But honestly, I think
if we can do with less asphalt on this planet, we would have a lot
better place to deal with.
MR. HANCOCK: I don't disagree. The problem that a church
faces, for example, is it's a financial issue. Unfortunately it's cheaper
to do asphalt over a 20-year period than it is to maintain grass,
unfortunately.
I think if you will allow me to discuss it with the pastor, maybe
when I come back up and we address this other language, I might have
something more concrete to offer you, no pun intended.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You might want to consider the fact that
our recommendation, if it's such, to limit this master plan, will save
Page 41
16/i~ 41
December 6, 2007
you considerably more money over 20 years than coming back before
this board every month.
MR. HANCOCK: The weight of your recommendation is noted,
SIr.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Tim, I've got to ask you a couple
of questions about the Neapolitan PUD. I'm not sure how familiar you
are with it. It's 90-16.
MR. HANCOCK: Mr. Chairman, I thought I had a copy of it
with me and I don't see it in my packet.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It might be a question I'm going to
better ask of staff. It's not built. So I'm wondering, is this considered
sunsetted, do you know?
MR. HANCOCK: If you look at when we started our rezone, it
would not have been.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: When did you start your rezone?
Because it would have had a five-year window from 91-102, which
was the establishment of our sunsetting provisions. By that would
mean if you hadn't got 15 percent done by '96, it would have
sunsetted.
MR. HANCOCK: We started in 2003 with the application.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You would have needed 45 percent
done by then, which you wouldn't have had. So I would think this is
sunsetted in some manner, unless there is some other action that
prevents it, a failure of government or something like that.
Ray, do you know?
MR. BELLOWS: I don't know if it's sunsetted, but your logic
would apply. And I think it should be classified as sunsetted.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The reason that may be important is
depending on what Nick's got to say when we talk to him about vested
trips and things like that.
Tim, that may be all, except for transportation, of which I have a
lot more.
Page 42
~.:..)/ t.,
;,-' 1"4 ,J
. h '-+
December 6, 2007
So with that, I appreciate your time.
Are there any other questions of Tim while he's up here,
gentlemen, ma'am?
(No response.)
MR. HANCOCK: I'll do my best to listen with one ear while we
speak to Mr. Klatzkow on this language.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: For the record, Nick Casalanguida,
Transportation.
(Speaker was duly sworn.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good morning, Nick.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: Good morning, sir.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I watched you dance around the traffic
corridor questions at the BCC meeting. You did a good job.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: I'm a lousy dancer.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't think you answered their
question in some regards, but you did a good job.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: Thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'll ask the other members here first if
they want to ask you any specific questions first.
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No?
I went and found the traffic analysis for the new -- I didn't find
it, actually, Melissa did at my request, the traffic analysis for the
Neapolitan. And actually Tim's one that they did to provide us with
today was not as bad as it would have been. Actually, he was more
conservative in his approach.
Based on what I can see here, their ending trips were much
higher than what peak and -- entering and ending trips were much
higher than what Tim indicated they were going to build. So in that
regard, it actually comes out better for them.
But they're going from 700 seats to 4,200 seats. I know they're
Page 43
1 bl A IJ.
I
December 6, 2007
doing it off peak, they're doing it on the weekend, but they're relying
upon a traffic access agreement that I haven't seen. Have you seen that
in regards --
MR. CASALANGUIDA: I have not seen that agreement.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Do we know if one's in place?
MR. CASALANGUIDA: I've spoken to Brian Howell probably
about eight months ago, who's building that Dolphin site, and he said
that that was agreeable to him to provide cross access. But I have not
seen the agreement. It might beneficial to have the agreement in place
or brought to the Board of County Commissioners before approval.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Do you know if that agreement, when it
was devised? When the Dolphin one was I think put together a while
back, they would have had to agree to this accessway at the time. And
at the time were they realizing that they were agreeing to it for a
700-seat church or a 4,200-seat church?
MR. CASALANGUIDA: You know, the difficult part is -- I go
to St. Agnes. No church works well on a Sunday morning or a
Saturday afternoon. And you can't design the access points to work
well for a church.
You look at 4,200 seats and you cut it in half and conservatively
say two people per car, 2,000 cars leaving at the same time. Even if
it's 1,000 cars, it's going to muck up the road system for a good hour.
So you can't build the intersection.
Now, I will say this: The intersections that are going to be
designed, Santa Barbara and Davis, are designed to handle p.m. peak
hour traffic significantly higher than Sunday traffic. For that one
concentrated 20 minutes where they all leave church, you're going to
have a problem there. But every single other church in the county
does, too.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But see, my question about that access
that's being -- that access easement area that they're utilizing, they
have a statement in their TIS that says it was designed by
Page 44
c;
,
f A It
~ecember 6: 2007
WilsonMiller.
My question to you as our traffic engineer, it says these turn
lanes have been designed and analyzed by WilsonMiller Engineering,
the engineers who have designed the Dolphin Plaza property, and they
already have a permit for the right-of-way work.
My question is what did they design to for the impacts on that
access? Did that intersection work that they now have a permit for? Is
it with the intention of a 700 traffic-generated church or 4,200, or
would it make a difference?
MR. CASALANGUIDA: No. And it won't make a difference,
and I'll tell you why. I have the WilsonMiller plans here, I pulled them
this morning. The Dolphin Plaza is going to put in a northbound right
turn lane as part of their site plan. The southbound left on Santa
Barbara, which is an access point, is substandard because of the
emergency access we have to provide to the EMS site, so --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You're talking way too fast.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: The southbound left on Santa Barbara
is underdesigned because of the EMS access we have to provide the
emergency medical service.
So again, I can't build any access point to any church to peak
event, peak entrance-exit traffic. You just can't do it. St. Agnes, where
I go is the same thing, you wait a half hour in the parking lot to leave
and you wait to get in. Everybody's coming at the same time and
leaving at the same time.
Now, for point of clarification, on Davis Boulevard -- I spoke to
the church fathers before I came up here and I said, I just want to be
clear on two things, and maybe it wasn't clear in the PUD document.
There is a 60-foot drainage utility easement that's in front of
their -- on their property. It doesn't say right-of-way easement. I would
like that clarified to read right-of-way easement as well, too.
There is an existing eastbound left turn lane, and existing right
turn lane. When we expand that road to six lanes -- and right now it's
Page 45
16'1 A 4
December 6, 2007
four lanes divided, not two as we show -- I'll have to rebuild those turn
lanes. If this site was not going to expand I would do that on the
county's dime.
What I asked the church fathers is when I rebuild this road that I
get compensating right-of-way of 15 additional feet if! need it and
that they pay for those turn lanes. And they've agreed to do that. And I
think that's the best I'm going to do working with the church.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Maybe that answers the next question I
was going to ask, because I think you referenced the same one.
In their traffic report on Page 11 under the Davis Boulevard
section, they talk about that currently the site provides two turn lanes.
The right-hand turn lane is currently maxed out and will remain in
place and operational during and after construction, with no
modifications proposed. Is that the one you're referencing?
MR. CASALANGUIDA: The right turn lane westbound is. And
I'm not worried about that, because that's a decel. lane and you've got
throats, so that will work okay.
The left turn lane will have to be increased, either now or when
we get the SDP, and I have copies of the site's aerial, or at the time I
widen Davis Boulevard, depending on what we see as traffic impacts.
My problem is I'm about a quarter mile from the intersection, I
can only lengthen it so long before I get into the turn lanes for the
intersection, but my median's pretty thick there.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Nick, I have another one. I'm
trying to figure out the best way -- well, there's a couple different
ones.
Under their trip distribution, Page 6 ofthe TIS, it says based on
discussions with the pastor of New Hope Church, anticipated
congregant draw will be about one-third from each of the three
directions north, south and west.
South? We don't have anything south, do we?
MR. CASALANGUIDA: You will, Santa Barbara extension.
Page 46
"~I /' ~" ;~~ ~I 1
j, t::, 9 h "~~.
December 6, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. But currently there's a direction
coming from the east.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: East.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So he's saying that there's no
congregants really coming from the east?
MR. CASALANGUIDA: I show 25 percent of the driving
coming from the east.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. If--
MR. CASALANGUIDA: And keep in mind, this started in
2003. I think in fairness to Davidson, we met and I finally put my
hands up and said I'll deal with the traffic issues. They had three or
four internal engineers that started the traffic statement, some people
that were fairly new, and it got to the point where we met, I don't
know, probably seven times. I said enough, no more traffic statements,
I'm getting a headache. I said we'll review it based on what I know
about the roadway capacities and the road projects that we have on it
with respect to a church.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, then I want to clear a couple of
things up for the record, but at the end I'm probably just going to ask
your overall impression about this in regards to traffic and see where
you go.
Page 4, they talk about Phase 2 trip generation for a multi-use
building, and they base their table of trips based on the church
administrator's prediction. How scientific is that compared to the
standards used in the traffic -- ITE?
MR. CASALANGUIDA: It's not atypical to deal with a site like
this and talk to the church and say what are you doing right now, what
do you propose to use, and you take it on good faith, no pun intended.
What I think, you could look at ITE, church sites, they do
different things. So I look at worst case scenario. Even if I double the
p.m. peak for ancillary uses I'm okay in the future.
So you'd ask the overall opinion, I'm concerned about peak event
Page 47
1 ',' c,
6 ~ecember 6, 2007
traffic. I can't do much about it. P.M. peak I know will be fine. If they
agree to modifY their turn lanes in the future in the right-of-way I
think I get an overall improvement to the system that they've helped
me with.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We have a serious problem with Davis
and 951.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: Yes.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: A lot of times -- every time that I can
recall we've received a TIS we have had a breakdown of the linkage
impacts on each link that the area -- that any particular project
impacts. And in this case we'd have to have Davis Boulevard both east
and west and Santa Barbara at least north.
I didn't see that percentage breakdown, and I know that Tim had
indicated to me in a phone call that it was somewhere in here.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: I think it's on page -- the one I have is
Page 9. They have Davis and Santa Barbara to 951.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't see the percentage, though. Do
you see that?
MR. CASALANGUIDA: Percentage of trips?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Percentage of impact -- where it
broaches the level of service impact that we need to be concerned
about.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: Tim, we've got seven different studies
going around on this thing. Are we looking at the same one? Not the
one I received? Could be. Let me take a look.
Show me 14 over 153.
Okay, I see where he's showing it to me.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, tell me.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: He's showing less than three percent --
roughly one percent impact on that link, based on p.m. peak analysis,
which is what 5.1 tells you to do. Even if! double that, Commissioner
Strain, and I go to two percent impact or three percent impact, I'm still
Page 48
: ,'- ~
Dece~ber 6~007
not going to have an adverse impact on the road going east.
The first part of Davis I'm improving is from Radio to 951.
State's five-year work program just came out and they still have 2011,
20]2 Santa Barbara to Radio in their work program. That's solid, that's
been approved. So those links going east are both scheduled to be
improved.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: In the analysis for the impact on the
adjacent roadways, were you relying on any vested trips for this
project?
MR. CASALANGUIDA: I was not.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So the Neapolitan approval of the PUD
you had not factored in as a vested trip project?
MR. CASALANGUIDA: I took what they had done on worst
case scenario. I took 4,200 seats, cut it in half and said worst case on a
Sunday you've got 2,000 cars. I asked them to do some Sunday
analysis. Based on that, the roadway capacity, even with the additional
cars, say 1,000 on each lane, is still below the service volume that we
look under in p.m. peak design.
So they were okay in terms of that. But will they muck up the
roads on a Sunday for about a half hour? Yes, they will.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No more than the flea market used to
and the drive-in theater across the street probably.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: Probably no more.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: On Page 10, under CCMA
requirements, Item D, flexible work schedules that are expected to
reduce peak hour automobile work trips generated by the
development.
That's the standard they're supposed to be responding to. Their
response is the addition of a multi-purpose building will generate little
new trips and the hours of operation will coincide with that of the
church. The church's main hours operation are during Sunday, which
will not coincide with the peak hours of the adjacent roadway.
Page 49
'Ii [ r'#f'.... lJl .
Jl, 0 'i J.' 4,
Decemb'er 6: 2007
How does that answer the question?
MR. CASALANGUIDA: It really doesn't. And when they
referenced the TCMA, and I can tell you again, we probably had five
different TIS's done by five different people from Davidson going
forward from 2003 till now. They were trying to go through what was
in our policy 5.], they were trying to go through the Growth
Management Plan, and they were responding to all of that in a sense
of overkill. And I said don't worry about that, that's not going to be
applicable to this project.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So Policy 6.2 is not applicable to this
project?
MR. CASALANGUIDA: They're not going to probably have to
do the TCMA requirements when they come in for application, and
that will be reviewed at SDP.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: On Page 12, the second paragraph, they
talk about a significant remaining capacity in the middle of the
paragraph, where it says while our project would only will impose
another 579 Sunday trips, peak direction, peak hour under the
segment.
I'm trying to figure out how they got to that calculation. Because
on Page 3, the existing peak hour is 536. So how can seven times the
existing be only 579?
Again, I may be reading it wrong, so I'm looking for
clarification.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: Peak hour, peak direction. I had said
to you 4,200 seats, cut that in half, that's cars, that's worst case. You're
looking at 2,000. Then you start splitting the trips up, in versus out in
all directions, you get to like a quarter of that. So you get into 500
peak hour, peak direction because they're going to split 25 percent in
all directions.
So when you start looking at that, that's kind of where you can
get to a number like that.
Page 50
TI .~' ~ ~A 1+
.~ '1Jecember 6, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, the Sunday seats in the
Page 3 looks like their peak hours are 536 entering and exiting -- or
228 -- I'm sorry, 211. Which one is the right one for their peak hours?
Page 3.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: I don't think they did a total. I gave
them the number of 2,000. That's probably where you're getting the
500 from. I said assume worst case. So they probably took my
guidance and put that in that response.
Again, I've got to tell you -- on Page 3?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I know it's the existing trips. If they're
seven times now the seating, it would seem to me logical that they're
going to have some ratio of six or seven times what their existing is. If
they're not, that's fine. But I haven't seen any -- I don't know what the
reasoning as to why they're not.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: You're talking about in versus out total
trips. When you do peak hour, peak direction, remember, you're
breaking total trips down into directions. They come out, they go
different directions. If they've got two access points and one goes
north, one goes south, you're getting a reduction.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So it's only one direction that this
579 is referring to.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: Peak hour, peak direction.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That helps.
Under the first bullet, I need to ask you how this is implemented.
It talks about -- and it's on Page 12 again, that they've hired a patrol
officer, and looks like he's been there 14 years -- he certainly likes his
job -- and he's going to continue to service.
Is this an element or an item that is required?
MR. CASALANGUIDA: I don't think it's in our codes. I think
it's a courtesy the church does to their members as well as to the
public. I know at St. Agnes they have a police officer out there as
well, too.
Page 51
J1.L~" i'~" i~!~
,"'"
December 6, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does it have any factor into your
analysis?
MR. CASALANGUIDA: No.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's my traffic questions of you, Nick.
Thank you very much.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: You're welcome.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else that has any traffic
questions or have I beat this to death?
Thank you, sir -- oh, Donna?
COMMISSIONER CARON: I just want to say thank you for the
explanation, because I had that same question, but it's the peak
direction that's being talked about here with the 579.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: It's really hard to analyze a church.
You don't really have -- you know it's going to be a problem, you do
the best you can and go from there.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you very much, sir.
MR. CASALANGUIDA: So those stipulations or
recommendations, Mark, were you able to notate those, about the --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I noted them, but I noted to say no
because Nick asked for them. Did you want those introduced?
MR. CASALANGUIDA: If! could.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: They're here, they're noted. Yes, sir,
thank you.
With that, we'll go into staff presentation.
MS. ZONE: Good morning. Melissa Zone, Principal Planner
with the Department of Zoning and Land Development.
We're going to be brief in my presentation, since it was a very
in-depth presentation from the applicant and transportation.
For the record, New Hope Ministry is on a parcel that is zoned
rural agricultural with a provisional use for the church use.
And they have purchased the Neapolitan Park PUD, which is
west of the church property, current church property. And Neapolitan
Page 52
161,] J,
Decerhber"t, 2007
Park PUD, by standards of the code, has sunsetted. Why they didn't go
through the sunset process staff, you know, can determine that.
And staff will ensure that your recommendations are placed in
the PUD in front of the Board of County Commissioners. So I want
that for the record.
But there is a conflicting recommendation. Transportation wants
the drainage easement along Davis Road, that 60- foot wide drainage
easement, to also include right-of-way. But if that becomes, or if
right-of-way can go into that 60-foot drainage easement, it could
impact the Lely area stormwater project, and there could be issues.
And Robert Wiley is here to address that, if you make that
recommendation to include it as right-of-way with the stormwater.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, we're going to -- Nick's obviously
got a comment on this --
MS. ZONE: I know. I know. As well as probably Robert Wiley.
But I wanted this board, before you make the determination to hear
both sides.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We will certainly, if we have questions
ofMr. Wiley, we'll certainly bring him up here and ask questions of
him, since he is here.
MS. ZONE: If there's any questions for me, I'm happy to address
them; otherwise, staffwill support planning commission's
recommendations.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you.
Nick, would you mind addressing that comment about the --
MR. CASALANGUIDA: Not at all. The LASIP manager who
works on that was Robert, is now Jerry Kurtz, who's in our building,
and we coordinate -- all road projects for LASIP are coordinated with
road projects, so there will not be a conflict.
It's just a clarification that says 60 feet of drainage and utility
easement -- it says right-of-way and I need two feet of that. I wouldn't
want to have to come back for clarification. But Lely would take
Page 53
16'/ A 4
December 6, 2007
precedence over roadway expansion, so that's not -- will not be a
conflict.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Are there any questions of
staff before I go to public speakers?
Ms. Caron?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah, Melissa, I just wanted to let
you know that on Page 3 of 8, I think you've got east and west
confused.
MS. ZONE: Oh, I did. And, you know what, I'll make sure that's
corrected for the -- to be presented to the Board of County
Commissioners. Thank you for pointing that out.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Then if you go to your rezone
findings for PUDs, couple of things. On number four, on Page 2 of3,
it's talking about internal and external compatibility. And one of the
things that you say as far as a pro is concerned is the proposed rezone
document incorporated design and buffering requirements. Additional
buffering requirements might be incorporated during the development
order process. Or we could be stipulating something here today,
correct?
MS. ZONE: Correct.
COMMISSIONER CARON: And I just want to cite an example
for the rest of the CCPC. Mr. Hancock pointed out that in -- that while
they've been very careful here to try to make sure that lakes and
preserves abut all of the homes, one or two of these homes apparently
are not included.
And so I'll ask Mr. Hancock afterward, but I think it would be
appropriate for us to stipulate now that additional buffering be granted
to those residential units.
MS. ZONE: I will address that.
And also, they had asked for a recommendation -- or a deviation
for the wall adjacent to the residential. And staff didn't support that
deviation because we wanted when they come in through the SDP
Page 54
" ,;.' ,
. f."". r l i'
".. 't {, 4;,
, ri J',
December 6, 2007
process, there's -- in the LDC, they can come in for a fence waiver.
And at that time we could determine if they do the fence waiver
against the residential property, they have to enhance the buffering to
what the standards would be.
So that's also another mechanism to -- in addition to the PUD
process or the rezoning process, that we would make sure when they
come in -- if they do come in for the administrative fence waiver. If
not, there will be a fence there to buffer those residential parcels.
COMMISSIONER CARON: So you're not supportive ofa PUD
deviation for fences --
MS. ZONE: Correct.
COMMISSIONER CARON: -- and a wall?
MS. ZONE: We're not supporting that. We're saying that if they
want the fence waiver, they would have to come in and submit an
application and have us look at it more in detail.
COMMISSIONER CARON: But that's not on your
recommendations.
MS. ZONE: Well, no, in the staff report I say we're not
recommending that deviation.
COMMISSIONER CARON: But wouldn't it end up being one
of your recommendations as well not to?
MS. ZONE: Usually we're not supporting it. But if you want, I
could add that in that we're not -- because they're asking -- staff gave
an explanation why we're not supporting it. And -- but if you want me
to present it differently, I'm more than happy to work with --
COMMISSIONER CARON: I just think we need to be specific
again. And we're trying to be very specific and make sure we include
all of these things as to whether they're supported or not supported.
MS. ZONE: Certainly. It's on Page 6 of8 in the staff report.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, are there any other questions
before we go to public speakers?
Mr. Midney?
Page 55
.7 A 4
December 6, 2007
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yes, I notice in the Exhibit A,
area one is existed native preservation and water management area. So
that means that you're combining water management with native
preservation, and that's already been there before.
Is that kind of combination something that is still normal
practice, or are we trying to separate water management areas from
preservation areas?
MS. ZONE: I know that they're wanting to separate them. I don't
believe the LDC amendment -- Barbara might be more informed of
that -- has gone through yet or not. But as a whole, that's how they are
looking at it now.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: In the future.
MS. ZONE: Correct.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Could you have you or somebody
else try to explain the sort of controversy or disagreement between
staff and the applicant in terms of whether they want to have the water
pre-treated or whether they want to prohibit all water from going into
the preserve area?
MS. ZONE: Yes. And I have here, and I'd like to read it into the
record, there is a recommendation that staff has looked at since this
discussion, and to read into the record for a new stipulation for this
water treatment.
It would be that receipt of treated stormwater discharge where
such use, including conveyance, treatment and discharge structures
does not result in adverse impacts to the naturally occurring native
vegetation, to include the loss of the minimum required vegetation and
the harm to any listed species, according to the policies associated
with Objective 7.1, as determined by criteria set forth in land
development regulations.
Discharge to preserves having wetlands requires treatment that
will meet water quality standards as set forth in Chapter 62-302 of the
Florida F AC, it's Florida --
Page 56
16i 4ec~ber 6, 2007
, COMMISSIONER CARON: Administrative Code.
MS. ZONE: Thank you, I had a loss there. Florida
Administrative Code. And now I've lost it.
MR. SCHMITT: The reading is the language from the CCME. I
think Barbara is going to have to read the stipulations.
MS. ZONE: Sorry, I thought that was the stipulation you wanted
m.
MS. BURGESON: For the record, Barbara Burgeson with
Engineering and Environmental Services Department.
The original staff report that you received with the stipulation
regarding the stormwater was not recommended by environmental or
engineering. That was -- it accidentally got into the staff report. It was
part of discussions back and forth. But the final determination by the
engineering and environmental services staff department consolidated
determination that the appropriate stipulation for that staff report
should never have been what you had in your original staff report. It
should have been what was amended and sent out to you, that no
storm water would be permitted in the upland preserve.
And there's a number of things that I wanted to put on record,
just to give you some back-up for that.
The first that I wanted to correct, or at least expand on, is that the
EAC, Environmental Advisory Council, did approve this project. It
was not a unanimous approval. One EAC member did deny the project
for environmental reasons.
But the reason that the remainder of the EAC approved the
project, and as they cited on record was not for any environmental
reasons at all. All of the reasons that they cited to approve the project
was based on the use. And they felt that it was a good use in a good
location. It was not -- there was not environmental basis for their
approval.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Before you go farther, Barbara, on that
point I'd like to ask the county attorney, this is happening more often.
Page 57
6
;~ 4' ,
I
December 6, 2007
Why is the EAC getting involved in planning issues that are outside
their jurisdiction, which is basically they're an Environmental
Advisory Council. And this has happened on other projects.
I'm just curious as what product analysis, use analysis they really
have to offer when their whole objective is environmental.
MR. KLATZKOW: This office allows a free discussion from all
boards on issues that they deem to be appropriate. We don't tell a
board what they should say or what they shouldn't say. If the Board of
County Commissioners starts to feel otherwise, I'm sure it will be
communicated downstream to them.
MS. BURGESON: We do attempt to keep the EAC focused on
just environmental issues. This is one of the -- we rarely see where
they go off, stray quite so much as they did on this one particular
project.
But I just wanted to put that on public record, that it may have
sounded like they supported the site plan environmentally, but that
was not the basis for the five people to support the site plan.
And also, earlier in the discussion there was a comment about
vacating a conservation easement. The original New Hope property,
the original 20 acres had the entire rear half of the property under a
conservation easement. And that was part of the property that had to
have the conservation easement vacated.
I'm not sure if that's been done yet or whether they're still in the
process to assure that that gets done. That was under -- placed under a
conservation easement because of the red-cockaded woodpecker use
on that site and the cavity trees that were in that area and one that was
on that site.
During site visits back with Nino Spagna and Kim Dryden and
myself, we noticed foraging RCWs on that site, back when their
original project was approved. So that's where the vacation of that
easement -- I believe that they did mitigation off-site, and that the
RCWs at that point when the state accepted off-site mitigation and
Page 58
16 -, De1emb~ 6, 2007
vacating that easement, there was no use of that rear portion of the
property for RCWs.
I also wanted to just put on public record at the -- two items: One
is the Board of County Commissioners' final hearing for the language
that was approved for the Growth Management Plan. And when the
Growth Management Plan language was discussed at that final
hearing, there was an attempt to -- or a proposal to modifY what the
EAC and this planning commission had recommended, which was no
adverse impacts.
And at one point both the EAC and the planning commission
had recommended language that said that it needed to actually benefit
the preserve. But then at your final meeting for that hearing, the
language went from benefit to no adverse impacts.
At the Board of County Commissioners a recommendation was
made to change that language. And then towards the end of that
meeting, as it was rediscussed, brought back up for a final evaluation
of that proposed change of the language, it went back to no adverse
impact language.
And in that discussion, Commissioner Henning discussed with --
also with Commissioner Halas and Bill Lorenz, had a fairly in-depth
discussion in terms of that Commissioner Henning had stated that it's
not there to put extra stormwater on vegetation that won't accept it. If
it's acceptable and won't degrade it, that's the whole purpose of it.
They talked about putting stormwater into a system that necessarily is
not used to that much stormwater. And that's why we have the adverse
impact statement in there, inclined to allow this to clarifY the details of
the criteria in the Land Development Code.
But as Mr. -- Commissioner Henning stated, that he would have
a problem if they were trying to degrade existing upland species. That
is not the objective.
So that was the discussions even at the final planning
commission hearing, that the objection is the stormwater was not to
Page 59
J (. A 4.!
December 6, 2007
provide a negative or change to the upland vegetation.
Now, concern that staff has is twofold: One, we went through an
LDC cycle at length last go around. We had created some pretty
specific language that went to the EAC and the planning commission
and the board that identified that it was appropriate for stormwater in
wetlands, and we limited the stormwater to hydric upland soils.
But we were saying that non-hydric upland soils were
inappropriate because of the potential change to that vegetation, that
the reason that we were protecting these preserves as they were
selected was because of the descending criteria. For instance, if we
selected a particular upland preserve, it was because that vegetation
on-site had a higher function and quality than the lower quality
wetland on-site.
And so to allow that upland to be impacted with more water than
is normal may not cause that vegetation necessarily to immediately die
off, but to probably -- and as put on that public record at the board
hearing, that it would definitely degrade the vegetation in that upland
by having the longer hydroperiod, the longer inundation of the upland.
Even the berm around it could have had a spreader swale to
allow that, if you had natural rainfall that might be bermed into that
area to naturally be discharged as opposed to, as the applicant says,
that it would just be a bathtub. You have the ability to do that
differently.
The -- all of the information that we had and reviewed by staff
indicated that we do not have -- we do not have the comfort level that
we could find this consistent with the GMP policies or the policies that
we are currently working on for 2008 first cycle. We are not proposing
language to allow this in the language that we're in draft form right
now.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Barbara, are you about to wrap up your
part of it?
MS. BURGESON: I can be done.
Page 60
161
PI J
t" ,,1.
e
December 6, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. The only reason is, I didn't think
we were going to get into this. I thought we were about done with this
one, and I apologize, Cherie', for not stopping at 10:00.
We will stop now and reconvene at 10:30 and provide you with
the break you should have gotten. Thank you.
(A break was taken.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, everybody, welcome back from
our break.
We left off, Barbara was getting close to wrapping up a
presentation. I'll ask her if she has any final comments before we ask
any questions.
Barbara, there is some questions from several members here of
the planning commission. The first one was Brad, then Mr. Midney,
then Ms. Caron.
Mr. Schiffer?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And Barbara, it goes way back
to the first thing you said is that we have a report that the
Environmental Advisory Council voted 5-1. But you said that that
wasn't an environmental council meeting, that was --
MS. BURGESON: No, I said that was an environmental meeting
but the vote was not -- when they put on record why they voted for it,
they did not list environmental reasons. The reasons that they
supported it were not based on the environmental Conservation Collier
-- the CCME or the environmental sections of the Land Development
Code.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The concern I have is we have
an environmental issue that they reviewed, and from the vote it
appeared they support it, but you're up here negating that support.
MS. BURGESON: I'm saying they supported it, but the
discussion was based on they thought that the church was a good use
of the property, that because of where the location was that they
would support a church in this area, that maybe more people would go
Page 61
"h A J.
..Ii,. '",! ~ Dectmber 6, 2007
to church. I mean, the discussion was not focused on environmental
Issues.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So nowhere in here did they
discuss the issue of putting stormwater into the preserve --
MS. BURGESON: They did discuss it. And the only person that
voted against the project was voting against it based on the
environmental concern.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: This is my last point. So can I
assume that the people who voted for it knew of that concern and
didn't have a problem with it?
I mean, it's the Environmental Advisory Council, it's not the
planning commission.
MS. BURGESON: I could not say that--
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: If you can't say it, that's good
enough.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Barbara, if I was watching a BCC
meeting and I heard staff characterize our vote in the manner you have
characterized theirs, I would be concerned over it.
I don't think it's appropriate. I think that they voted the way they
did because they reviewed everything. Now, they may have
complimented the uses, they may have complimented the fact more
people need to go to church, but the point is they didn't come out as a
majority against it for any environmental reason.
And I think they would have if they thought there was one there.
And I think that's maybe the basis we ought to be relying upon, not
anything else at this point.
Mr. Midney, you were next.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, just to go back to what
Brad is saying. They didn't put any stipulations in. I mean, if they had
some -- if they were unhappy about the environmental aspects, I
would have thought that they would have put in some stipulations.
And they didn't do that; is that correct? The EAC, they didn't -- you
Page 62
11'"
fl, r,
i1 ~"~
J
December 6, 2007
"
ebb,
said that they --
MS. BURGESON: They didn't add stipulations.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Okay. Is the environmental
department's objections related to nutrients entering in or just change
in the water table?
MS. BURGESON: Staffs recommendation on the EAC--
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, staffs recommendations on
this development. And their objection to any stormwater entering the
site, is that based on nutrients or is it just based on water table?
MS. BURGESON: It's mostly based on the water table and the
inundation, not on the nutrients.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: How can you prove that there
will be no adverse impact of a development onto this upland preserve?
MS. BURGESON: The evidence that we were using was the
tables that evaluated the inundation, typical inundation periods of --
and the hydroperiod in a typical upland.
We looked at what the maximum amount of stormwater in that
area might be acceptable in terms of under normal circumstances. But
that's without a berm around it holding it in. And remember, too, that
that is always without the consideration for the duration after that
event.
So if you look at the evaluation for let's just say a storm event
that is going to pop off into that preserve area, and they say that it's
just going to go up to, you know, maybe two or three inches or three
or four inches under normal conditions, if that preserve didn't have a
berm around it and wasn't actually part of the stormwater system
where the intent is to retain it there for a duration of 12 to 15 days.
So you're talking about each of those events has an extended
period of inundation. We had -- no one that we talked to felt that that
-- that they felt comfortable that that would not -- they could not prove
that that would not have a negative impact to upland vegetation,
especially where the upland vegetation was in non-hydric soils.
Page 63
16 r ,A 4
December 6, 2007
I mean, and through the whole year of research that we did with
the last LDC cycle, we came up with the concept back and forth with
the stakeholders group that upland soils were not appropriate. And that
recommendation through that whole process never included upland
soils, it included wetland soils and hydric soils that might not be
jurisdictional. But these are not even hydric soils, these are non-hydric
upland soils.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: I'm starting to understand what
you're saying.
If they're building it up, the area around it, the drainage, I guess,
would be going down. Usually you think of an upland as an area
where water would drain out of. But you're saying I guess that where
they build up the area with fill and everything that it will become an
area where water will drain into it.
MS. BURGESON: Where it pops off after certain major events.
And the concern isn't necessarily how often that does that, but the
concern is the duration of that inundation in that upland area.
And there's another issue, too, and that is when you talk about an
upland area and upland soils and the vegetation, particularly the
ground cover that's in that area being completely flooded, one ofthe
things that's important to know is that it's not just whether or not that
area can accept a minimal amount of flooding, but there's also a
critical dry-down period that is necessary for uplands and upland
plants, and particularly ground cover, to be healthy and successful.
And if what you're doing is just keeping it a little bit wetter all of the
summer, and even if it's just a little bit, you're in the root system,
you're not allowing the natural dry-down and the actual need for an
extreme dry-down in an upland area.
So there wasn't -- and for the whole reason that we went for this
last process, not including upland soils, we feel that the language in
the GMP that requires, and in the discussions with Commissioner
Henning, Commissioner Halas and Mr. Lorenz, to not negatively
Page 64
fl tZ R
,J~ !'~1 H
ft '
j. n '1
,j' 4 L~~
December 6, 2007
impact the upland vegetation, that this would not be -- this would be
not consistent with that GMP language.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: So do you have any suggestions
about how they could manage their stormwater so that it wouldn't
have to go there? Because it seems like it's going to be kind of hard --
they're not talking about directly discharging in by any kind of piping
or anything, but just seepage through the water table. How can you
avoid that?
MS. BURGESON: I understand that from other discussions that
that is a lot more complicated, to design a stormwater system to keep
the -- the point here is directed stormwater into that system. We can't
-- we don't have a GMP language that specifically says that you can't
change the ground table. We do everything we can to prevent
stormwater being added into that preserve as an additional threat to the
upland vegetation, native vegetation in there.
But we do have e-mails back and forth on this particular project
where the project manager did say please -- because our
recommendation was denial of this project initially. And then we said
well, we don't have a stipulation that will allow us to approve this.
And then the recommendation from that applicant was we'll
accept language as a stipulation that there will be no stormwater in the
upland preserve, and we will work around that. And we've got that in
an e-mail that they offered that they could do that.
And so there must be -- and I'm not an engineer designer, but
there must be some other opportunity to design that project, if that was
offered in an e-mail to us, in order to approve the project.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Okay, so you are recognizing that
they're not directly discharging in there by any piping, it would just be
by the seepage from the water table. But --
MS. BURGESON: Well, their proposed plan is direct discharge.
It is as popping off over the system, it is.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Tim, we're certainly going to provide
Page 65
~ F ,1
; /...'
_i... ~: ~~
ll,( 4
H ~
December 6, 2007
you time to rebut, so --
MR. HANCOCK: Sorry.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Okay. All right, thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah, I'm a little concerned, and I
want to go back to the issue of this vacation of the conservation
easement. You made a statement that half of the back of the current
project was a conservation easement.
MS. BURGESON: Correct. That was -- half of that property was
preserved through the previous SDP as listed species preserves and
required a state conservation easement on it.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay. And I read in the back-up
material that they had mitigated for any listed species issues.
MS. BURGESON: Urn-hum.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Now, does the environmental and
engineering staff agree that we as a county are getting more in
preservation at this point than we would have gotten otherwise? In
other words, I'm trying not to lose -- I mean, understanding that
they've mitigated, so that --
MS. BURGESON: Right. I don't have any specific information
on what that off-site mitigation was.
We were concerned to make sure that the project was compliant
with the current GMPs for minimum preservation of native vegetation
on-site. And since, the listed species surveys identified that the RCW
were no longer on the property. So I can't tell you whether -- assuming
that 50 percent of that site, they had originally close to a 10-acre
preserve, sayan eight-acre preserve, we are getting less preservation
on this site. I don't know what the off-site mitigation acreage is.
COMMISSIONER CARON: I'll ask Mr. Hancock, thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I respect the fact that you're
trying to do your job, no question about that.
Page 66
Decln~er'6,10074
But you indicated that there -- in conversations with
Commissioner Henning and others that they felt, you feel, that there
could be no inundation or putting water into those upland preserves,
and I appreciate that.
But I have -- Mr. Hancock indicated that they attempted to
respond to each and every request for scientific determination of when
something can be shown proven, scientifically proven, that it will
degrade the vegetation. And from what I heard, and unless I'm in error
in what I heard, it sounded as though the probability level is extremely
low for these events.
Is there any standard that you use to reference at what point we
should not allow any development relative to such a condition? I
mean, is there any point where you will accept that there's a scientific
basis for going forward?
MS. BURGESON: Yes. And we are in the process of -- Margie
asked that I not discuss too much ofthe draft LDC stuff because it's
not been approved or aired yet, but we are in the process of creating
. . ,
cntena.
And for this project, because it comes before aUuf that criteria is
created, we went through all of the evaluation of all of the data that
was presented to us and the applicant's attempt to support that this
would not be a negative impact to this upland soils and upland
preserve.
And staffs full evaluation and discussion with engineering and
environmental, the conclusion has been from the beginning, each time
additional information was provided to try to support or change staffs
mind that the scientific data would support this stormwater in the
upland preserve, staff did not feel -- not feel -- staff did not evaluate it
the way the applicant is presenting it to you to feel comfortable that
that would not be an adverse impact.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So you're telling us that you
have those criteria.
Page 67
II II<t
16' A 4
December 6, 2007
MS. BURGESON: We are working on that criteria right now for
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So then you don't have those
criteria?
MS. BURGESON: Correct. We have the--
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Well, if you don't have those
criteria, how could you possibly make a determination?
MS. BURGESON: We have the criteria that we developed
through or were using through the LDC cycle last year to come up
with the language that we had proposed through the entire LDC cycle
that this board approved last year, and went to the Board of County
Commissioners and only got to that final meeting where there was a
change in that language.
And we have done a handful of reviews and projects where we
have evaluated whether it's appropriate to put stormwater in
non-wetlands, non-jurisdictional wetlands, and have permitted that
through this similar type of evaluation. But those have always been
hydric soils and not non-hydric --
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I hear you and I respect the fact
that you are attempting to do your job, but I don't think--
MS. BURGESON: We do have criteria that we've been using.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You two can't talk over one another.
And I think we heard the story. I think we know what you're going to
say if we ask you another question.
I have no further questions. Anybody on this panel?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Ray, do we have any public
speakers?
MR. BELLOWS: We have three public speakers, but I believe
they're affiliated with the church. Grant Thigpen, Pete Smith and Earl
Morgan.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ifany of you gentleman would like to
Page 68
i~ f! f It 1.
Deceiriber 6, 2007
speak, you need to come up to the podium and identifY yourselves for
the record. And we ask that you limit your discussion to five minutes.
Thank you.
MR. THIGPEN: Grant Thigpen, Pastor of New Hope Ministries.
I want to thank you for seeing us this morning.
Really, I think Tim has pretty well voiced all of my concerns
and has represented the church very well this morning. And I would
just ask you to -- by the way, I don't envy you having to do this. But I
just ask you to take into consideration what the EAC has
recommended and go with it and let us move on and do what we're
called to do.
But I appreciate you, thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, sir. Any of the other
speakers wish to speak? Ifwe they do so, please come on up.
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Nope, doesn't look like it, Ray.
Okay, with that, Tim, do you want to take a short rebuttal?
MR. HANCOCK: The word short well noted, Mr. Chairman.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you.
MR. HANCOCK: It was not our intent to engage you in a policy
discussion today about stormwater management and preserves, but to
display as clearly as we can the extreme effort we've gone to show on
this site that it works.
I think we have done that. I think the EAC decision reflects that
effort and the evidence put into record, despite the characterizations
you heard today.
I was at that meeting. I'm pretty sure I was, I presented the
information. And the EAC minutes reflect that one of the key issues
was the lack of a standard. And in the face of the lack of a standard
you have to use what is reasonable and prudent. And we as an
applicant met at a minimum that standard.
The only standard that's been touted out there is Mike Duever's
Page 69
._"/' !,
J-CI
December 6, 2007
~
r 1
l,,~~
report which talks about the transition of a hydric soil condition of
mesic flatwoods to a wetter soil condition of hydric flatwoods.
We don't trip it. I don't know what else we can say in the
absence of a standard.
The RCW issue, I want to be very clear about this. That
preserve, Commissioner Caron, was for an RCW colony, which no
longer existed. They even went to the extent of 30 days of continuous
video taping and whatnot. And the agencies all signed off that the
RCWs were no longer present or nesting.
In a form of mitigation for the church when it was originally
built, 30 acres were purchased off-site for a combination of wetland
and RCW mitigation, and were then improved and exotics removed
and so forth.
So any concern about a net loss, actually it goes the other way,
there's a net of -- an increase in land being set aside, when you
combine all of the elements together.
There's a patently false statement by Ms. Burgeson that I have to
point out when she indicated direct discharge into the preserve. I don't
know if it's a lack of understanding, I don't know what it is. But our
water management plan associated with this project under the SDP
review includes all stormwater entering a dry pre-treatment area, then
into a lake before discharging into the preserve. The only direct
discharge into that preserve is rainfall under our plan.
Characterizing water that comes out of a lake which is part of a
water management system as direct discharge is not true. What is true
is when you do directly discharge, that's what you get. (Indicating.)
Wow, that's awful. I'd hate to see that happen.
This is where the water will be going, nine to 15 days a year. I
don't see ground cover drowning in that picture.
Folks, what is an individual approval that we're seeking has been
turned into a policy directive by the environmental staff, and we're not
buying it.
Page 70
16 J A ),
December 6, 23"07
We've proved our case, we've made the best effort we can. We
can only ask for your consideration. And I apologize for placing you
in this position, but on this project where we have nine years of proof
that direct discharge has not adversely affected a preserve, for us to
pre-treat water three times the commercial requirement prior to
discharge into a preserve, meaning less water, less hydroperiod
influence, and to ask for your consideration I hope is more than
appropriate.
With that, sir, I'll answer any other questions you may have.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, could the drainage system
be redesigned to avoid even indirect water table shifts into the upland
preserve?
MR. HANCOCK: Yes, sir. All that requires is that we give more
land up and lose the use of it.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: How much more would you
estimate that it would take?
MR. HANCOCK: It would require the construction of an
additional lake structure, because the existing lake is wrapped on three
sides by the preserve. Due to the side slopes required to even achieve
a one-foot across the board volume in this, it may be as much as two
acres.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: When you say that the lake is
what directly goes into the preserve, is there a berm between the lake
and the preserve? Or what is it like, the lake merging into a wetland?
MR. HANCOCK: The western edge ofthe lake itself -- and I'll
provide the soon to be simplified plan for you. The lake in the upper
right hand comer there, as the water enters that lake it will spill over
that lake on the western side at grade into the preserve. So no, there's
-- it doesn't have to breach a berm necessarily.
Now you will naturally, when the lake is constructed, the edges
of the lake will come up a little bit, just by nature of construction. But
Page 71
161 A 4
December 6, 2007
the water will, almost like a spreader swale, if it gets to that point it
will then spread out into the preserve.
We're not berming the preserve. What we have to do is we have
to elevate the balance of the site in order to meet South Florida
District criteria for finish floor elevation. So by elevating the rest of
the site, it's a de facto berm.
But let me point out that it's happening on the other two sides of
these preserves without us doing anything. The difference is, no
matter what happens water will never sheet flow out of this preserve.
Whether we put storm water management or not, water will cease to
sheet flow across this site.
The question is, is it better for the preserve to connect it to a
water management system with a positive outflow, or do we allow it
to in essence be bermed and isolated and require that the water leave
only one way, vertically? Our answer is no.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anything else?
Ms. Caron, did you have -- did anybody else have anything?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Tim, I had asked you to research two
questions that we had talked about earlier, and I was wondering if
you've gotten responses to those.
MR. HANCOCK: Yes, sir, and I hope they will please you.
On the issue of the language that you put forth, we've reviewed
it with Mr. Klatzkow, and for this particular use in this land we have
no objection to the inclusion of that language.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you.
MR. HANCOCK: The second issues, Mr. Casalanguida
mentioned a IS-foot -- or changing that easement to include
right-of-way. We have no issue with that.
He had requested that the church -- if the turn lanes are required
to be extended prior to the road widening, we have to pay for that. If
they are extended as a function of the roadway widening, we will
Page 72
, -
t f~> J tf
'1 11 (~
December 6, 2007
participate in that also.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I asked you about eliminating the
asphalt for the parking spaces and do asphalt aisles only with the
exception of the two easternmost lanes in that westernmost large
parking lot. How do you feel about that?
MR. HANCOCK: I'd like to go a slightly different route but I
think gets there. While the LDC allows for up to 70 percent
impervious, there's no minimum. In other words, you don't have to do
any.
What we'd like to suggest is that we think we can very easily
live with a minimum of 30 percent of all required parking for the
church will be of pervious surfaces. And we think that what that
allows us to do is because that includes the existing parking, which is
paved, so we don't get ourselves in a bind there, it results in about half
of the required additional parking ending up as pervious.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anything's better than nothing. I think
that's fine.
Anybody else?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Tim, I have one last comment to make,
and your aerial portrays it pretty well. First of all, there's a lake in the
bottom of the aerial, and there's one in the north right-hand comer.
The property, you're digging another lake.
During the rural fringe and during the stewardship area lands
review five years ago the environmental community was very
concerned about excavations close to preserves. Their argument was
that the closer you get with an excavation, the more change to the
hydrology and the draining of those preserves is going to occur as a
result of that excavation.
And so we had minimum standards. And I think they were
asking for 2,500 feet, and I think we ended up with maybe 1,500 or
something like that.
Page 73
C:J //'. .c A 4
I: ......
I. '''"'
, )
December 6, 2007
In this case your lakes are adjacent, contiguous or part of the
preserves. The hydrology is going to change in those preserves. So
from the testimony you supplied today and the engineering that you
supplied today, not only do I feel that you are not having an adverse
impact to those preserves, you're having a positive impact to those
preserves, and I'm glad that you're doing what you're proposing to do.
So with that, I have no other questions or comments.
Mr. Schiffer?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I just have, and this is a huge
question. What was the problem with the dock again? I didn't --
MR. HANCOCK: I'll have to defer to Ms. Caron. We quite
candidly haven't been hanging our hat on the dock anyways, so --
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: It's a nice little pond, the kids
might want a nice little dock.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: It's the same with a boardwalk.
COMMISSIONER CARON: I asked.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The boardwalk wasn't removed.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But Donna, you really don't
want their ability to put a dock in the pond?
COMMISSIONER CARON: No, no, no. I asked a question
about why there was boat docks, plural, in this proposal when they
have a very tiny little lake that --
MR. HANCOCK: We'd rather remove the concern than fight for
the docks.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So you are taking it out?
MR. HANCOCK: I'm happy to remove it.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'm not going to fight much for
that. It just seems -- I mean, the kids could have a canoe dock.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Before we go there, Donna, do you care
if the dock's in or out? You were just asking a question, right?
COMMISSIONER CARON: I just asked a question. It was a
very simple question, along with several others about uses that are on
Page 74
i'l
11 t I', 11
De~m~e~16, 2067
that property, about printing uses and --
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So we can put it back in.
COMMISSIONER CARON: -- book stores and everything else.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right, I think in an effort to not cause a
problem, we jumped to a conclusion that that was something that
somebody didn't want. I don't think that's the case. So why don't we
just not strike boat docks and just leave it there.
MR. HANCOCK: Applicant agrees to leave it in.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Now, what about a marina? Would you
like to go for a marina?
COMMISSIONER CARON: No.
MR. HANCOCK: Nothing over 35 feet, I promise.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ifthere's no other questions--
COMMISSIONER CARON: Don't worry, administratively you
can have it.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti, did you have a question?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: No, I'm waiting for discussion.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, we've got to close the public
hearing first, that's where I was leading to.
No other public speakers? We'll close the public hearing and
we'll first entertain a motion.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I will entertain a motion of
approval. But I'd like to make a discussion beforehand, or do I need a
second?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: I'll second.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Why don't we -- yeah, why don't we
make a motion, then we'd have a discussion as part of the motion.
So Mr. Vigliotti made the motion, Mr. Midney seconded. And
Mr. Vigliotti wanted to make a statement with the motion. So go
ahead, sir.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: It would be good to know what
the motion was.
Page 75
16 J: ,;,
December 6, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion of approval.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'm really concerned about
staffs confusion on this. I'm really disappointed. Staff has
recommendations that should have been in that were noted under
deviations that aren't here. We got stipulations that came last night, it
was early. I have no idea how that happened. Then we're being told
that the wording was wrong on the ones we have.
Also, we spent most of our time talking about environmental
issues and we have an EAC that knows, I believe, more than we do
here. And I think we should go with their recommendation.
So I'm going to make a recommendation for approval without
any stipulations and putting in a 30 percent impervious parking, and
I'm sure commissioners have others, so --
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I'll second the motion.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, Mr. Midney already seconded the
motion.
Mr. Midney, you still second the refined motion, as we'll call it?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Urn-hum.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Motion's been made and
seconded. Now we have discussion.
And I certainly have -- I have 11 notes that have to be discussed.
And Mr. Adelstein wanted to comment. Go ahead, Mr. Adelstein.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: No, it's all right.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody else want to offer any
discussion before I go into the stipulations?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: No, I'm waiting for your
additional notes.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Just notes that I--
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney, you had something you
want to say first?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, I just kind of agree with
Mr. Vigliotti, that if the EAC supports it, and they have more expertise
Page 76
!~e~Ar 6, lJo07
about that than I do, then I'll go along with that.
But I am interested in that there be some sort of standards so
that, you know, if environmental staff does want to prevent water
being discharged into uplands, that there be something concrete that
we can go on. And I'm not opposed to the idea of prohibition of
drainage into uplands, but I would like it to be something that could be
more provable.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, sir.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'd like to add one thing.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead, Mr. Vigliotti.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Over the last few months we've
had quite a few churches come in for PUDs and new construction and
expansion. I'm really glad to see the churches getting together and
realizing this county is growing and they're stepping up to the plate to
the needs of the community and preparing to grow, because it's a
costly and expensive situation for a church to grow, and I'm just glad
to see they're all stepping up to the plate.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, the notes that I have, the
first one is involving the topic we spent probably way too much time
on and that's the wetlands, or the discharge. And basically staff had
given us a recommendation originally and then followed it up by a
second recommendation.
The first recommendation, the applicant has already said they
can design to and they agree with, and I think it's a good
recommendation. And it reads as follows:
The CFPUD and master plan shall full (sic) water quality
pre-treatment volume before the water reaches an elevation that would
have the lake overflow its banks and then backflow into the natural
ground areas, parentheses, preserves.
I would suggest that part of our stipulation, that is the
recommendation that we include.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: That's fine. I'll add that to my
Page 77
161/: 4'~
December 6, 2007
motion.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: (Indicating.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The second does too. Okay.
The next item I have is -- we clarified some language, and I'll go
through it all. Maybe we'll get a comment at the end. 4.2.8.3, the water
management structures that are used -- you have placed in the
preserves will only be those required by the permitting agencies.
We'll strike Item 5.8.C. I'm not sure what that is, I didn't make a
note on it. I'll double check right now so we don't have a mistake.
Thank you, Ms. Caron will get that. While she's doing that I'll go
on to the next one.
The PUD boundary setback to residentially adjacent properties
for accessory structures will be the same as principal, 25 feet.
And Ms. Caron, is that --
COMMISSIONER CARON: 5.8.C was the conservation
easement vacation.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh, that's right, there wasn't any -- the
need, and so we're going to strike that from the PUD.
COMMISSIONER CARON: It's already happened, according to
the applicant.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right.
Under number five, which was the allowable uses in the
preserves: The paths, bikeways and pathways referenced will be for
non-paved surfaces, excluding of course the boardwalk, which
wouldn't qualifY for that. That was 4.2.A.2.
The master plan will be modified to produce it as a conceptual
master plan, because the one that was obtained here is an SDP plan,
which would actually lock you in and cause you to be here many more
times than you need to be.
The master plan shows parking. The 30 percent of the parking
will be impervious. Yeah, will be impervious -- will be pervious areas,
not impervious, will be pervious areas.
Page 78
1"
{-, , ~
,\~; A
December 6,20 7
Okay, now those are the items in the PUD that I found.
Ms. Caron?
COMMISSIONER CARON: No, no, you're--
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: First, before we go further -- I've got
more, but let us finish the PUD ones up first.
Does the motion maker agree with those for the PUD?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Yes, I do.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does the second?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yes.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Then the next ones that I have, there
was a -- Ms. Caron?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Before you go off of that, did you
talk about the 25 feet --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay. I didn't check that off.
Sorry .
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No problem.
We talked about verification that the access agreement between
-- for that other access on Santa Barbara is in place and should be
provided to the BCC by the time this gets to them.
That the right-of-way easement on the south side of the property
along Santa Barbara that's now shown as a drainage easement will also
be shown as a right-of-way -- I mean, it's a drainage easement that will
be shown as a right-of-way easement as well.
MR. HANCOCK: I believe that's Davis.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Davis. I'm sorry, I said Santa Barbara.
I'm glad you corrected me, thank you.
That the applicant has agreed for providing compensating
right-of-way for any additional turn lanes and to pay for the turn lanes
that are going to be installed to service their facility.
Page 79
lr
.r,
/'1
^,J;,
/.(
December 6, 2007
Staff is going to add a comment to show that they are not
supportive of the deviation request and the reasoning why.
And that the applicant has agreed to add the incompatible
language that we introduced in the previous PUDs last week, same
language.
Are there anything that I missed?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Yeah. Three stories, not to
exceed 48 feet.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. That was a grammatical change,
but that's fine, that was one we brought up.
With those changes and those stipulations in mind, does the
motion maker accept those as part of the stipulation?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Yes, I do.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does the second?
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: (Nodding.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Second does by nodding affirmatively.
Any other discussion amongst the panel?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All those in favor, signifY by saying
aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Anybody opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries unanimously 7-0. Thank
you.
MR. HANCOCK: Thank you.
Page 80
16/A 4
December 6, 2007
Item #8B
PETITION: PUDZ-2005-AR-8416, DISTINCTIVE RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT AT LIVINGSTON, LLC
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, the next item up today is Petition
PUDZ-2005-AR-8416, Distinctive Residential Development at
Livingston, LLC, represented by Wayne Arnold and Richard
Y ovanovich, to rezone from agricultural to an RPUD.
All those wishing to testifY on behalf of this application, please
rise to be sworn in by the court reporter.
(All speakers were duly sworn.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Disclosures on the part of
the planning commission?
Mr. Murray?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I had a conversation with Mr.
Y ovanovich and asked him questions and pointed out issues that I had.
And he was going to take it under advisement and we'll discuss it this
mornmg.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I also talked to Mr.
Y ovanovich.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron?
COMMISSIONER CARON: I had a conversation with Mr.
Y ovanovich as well.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: He's been a pretty busy fellow this time.
Anybody else besides me? I had a conversation with Mr.
Y ovanovich and Mr. Arnold. And we will be talking about the same
things here today. And it's involving most of the PUD standards.
Mr. Vigliotti?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: And I also spoke to Mr.
Y ovanovich.
Page 81
161
"
,f
~', i
';'11'
December 6, 2007
,t.
.'~ t
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, with that, the applicant ready for
a presentation?
MR. YOV ANOVICH: Good morning. For the record, Rich
Y ovanovich, on behalf of the applicant. Also with me are Steve
Fiterman and Dave Sturdyvin, representatives ofthe owner of the
property, Wayne Arnold, Mark Minor and Kim Schlachta also are
available to answer questions.
On the visualizer is the -- is an aerial of the property location.
This is a request to rezone 17.52 acres currently zoned agricultural to
RPUD.
The property is located on the east side of Livingston Road just
north of Veterans Memorial, as you can see on the bottom half of the
aerial. It's completely surrounded by Mediterra to the north, east and
south. And further east is Tuscany Reserve.
The property is designated urban residential under the
comprehensive plan.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Richard, your speaker -- as short as you
are, you need to pull that speaker a little closer.
Oh, I'm sorry, I was thinking of Tony Pires.
MR. YOV ANOVICH: There's a short end for the short guy. Is
that better?
Okay. I know, I've got nothing going for me.
Under the urban residential fringe designation in the
comprehensive plan the property owner could ask for the base density
of up to four units per acre, plus various other bonuses. The request
before you is for 43 units, which is essentially a density of2.57 units
per acre.
We worked closely with representatives -- why don't I just do
this. We worked closely with representatives of the developer of
Mediterra on designing what we anticipated putting on this infill piece
of property. They wanted us to have products similar to what they
were doing in Mediterra, so they were looking at decent size
Page 82
l6 i A 4
December 6, 2007
single-family homes or decent size zero lot line product on this parcel.
And if you drive up and down that street, you'd wonder why this
wasn't in Mediterra in the first place. They had issues acquiring the
property with the property owner. We came years later after Mediterra
was designed and did acquire the property. So we're trying to do
basically what's in Mediterra, since it's so close to Mediterra.
More than likely, we'll be doing a zero lot line project on that
property. However, we do want to have the ability to do single-family
if, you know, marketing conditions dictate that we should develop this
as single-family.
Therefore, I need to make a couple of changes in the
development standards table that were pointed out to me through
meetings with various members of the planning commission.
Wayne and I kind of took this project over more than halfway
through and didn't catch these standards in the table.
Under the single-family column, you'll see we have a side yard
setback of seven-and-a-half feet and then a minimum distance
between principal structures of only 10 feet. And as creative as I can
be at times, I couldn't figure out how to make seven-and-a-half and
seven-and-a-half equal 1 O.
And then I realized well, that's usually not what you see in front
of you anyway. Usually you see on single-family, you see a six-foot
setback and a minimum separation of 12 feet between structures. So
that's really the numbers that should be there for the side yard. It
should be a six-foot setback, and then the distance between principal
structures should be 12 feet on the single-family standard.
Also, under maximum height your staff report says that's
maximum zoned height. That wasn't clearly reflected in the table. So
we need to say maximum zoned height on that table of 35 feet.
And really, footnote number seven is really -- I believe it's
footnote number seven, is really not necessary for this project. So
footnote seven should come out. I've got that right, right? So footnote
Page 83
.I tiP'"
. A 1J
December 6, 2007
seven should come out of that development standards table as well.
One other deviation that you'll notice, we didn't ask for, is
because -- which is the standard deviation that -- for cul-de-sacs
greater than 1,000 feet. Do you have the master plan?
You'll notice that when you measure the cul-de-sac, we were
asked to move the access further north to get it away from Mediterra's
access. And what that did is that created that portion of right-of-way
that will put us over 1,000 feet in length.
We were told when we originally went through the submittal of
this that we didn't have to ask for the deviation of 1,000 feet, that it
could be administratively granted. That was asked -- many of you
asked that question of me as we were talking about that. And I just
wanted to clarifY that on the record that yes, we can have that
administratively. Ifnot, I know it's unusual, but we'd like to add that
as a deviation at this point, if it's something that we need to add in the
PUD. It's something you see frequently, so I hope it won't be
something that would be a problem to add that now.
But we were told administratively we can have that. It was
questioned by several planning commissioners. I'd like to get that on
the record. And frankly, it might make more sense to put it in the PUD
so you're not going outside of the PUD document to have to track
down the record as to maybe that administrative provision goes away
in the LDC later and we may have somehow unintentionally gotten
stuck with a problem.
So I think that highlights the changes to the development
standards, highlights the project, shows you what it's about.
Wayne's going to briefly take you through the deviations we've
requested. And after that, if it makes sense -- or you can ask questions
any time, obviously, but if you let Wayne go through the deviation
discussion we'd be available to answer any questions you may have
regarding the project.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Mr. Chairman, if! may?
Page 84
,...,~
: ri ,A f'l
,," 11..,
December 6, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead, Mr'!'Mutray.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: There was one issue that we
discussed on Page 4 having to do with the arithmetic, and 1.4. And I
spoke to you about if the lot lines we weren't sure, you weren't sure
about. I know there's a minimum lot 5,000. When you do the
arithmetic, you come up with 7.404 for the home sites.
Do you recall that conversation?
MR. YOV ANOVICH: Yes, I do. And if you look at the water
management report, and that's another thing I need to bring up, you'll
see that the lots are not uniform in size. The R area on the master plan
is 12.51 acres. So even though we have the minimum lot standards,
they're not all minimum lots. And that's going to be the difference in
how we come up with this size of the development area of 12.51.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay, because my question to
you at the time was what are the 5.1 additional. And I speculated what
was that, clubhouse, pools, what? And you said no, they were not the
amenities. So it's all of those lots, regardless of their size, that are all
dedicated to housing.
MR. YOV ANOVICH: Minus the preserve area, which is .82,
minus the water management area, which is 2.2, and the roads, which
are almost two. The difference is the development area is 12.51.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay. I wanted to get that on the
record, because that makes it what otherwise would be confusing.
MR. YOV ANOVICH: And I was also asked the question about,
you know, the water management report says 41 lots, you're asking for
43. Well, the water management report was the current plan.
However, that could change. And we would like to have the ability to
do 43 units.
In the project it would still be within the same development area
and it would have to still meet the development standards. But right
now the product we're looking at probably will only yield 41. That's
why the water management report shows 41. But we would like to
Page 85
16 rJecem~er 6,4007
have that flexibility that if things change we could go to the maximum
of 43 units.
So that explains the discrepancy between the water management
report and the PUD request.
Any other questions before I turn it over to Wayne to talk about
the deviations?
Yes, sir.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, is this project going to do
anything for affordable housing?
MR. YOV ANOVICH: The answer is yes. And honestly, I didn't
know which way to handle it. I didn't know whether to put it in the
PUD document or go through a separate donation. We're acceptable
going either way. You know, what has become the standard has been
1,000 per unit at closing. We're fine with doing that either in the PUD
document or through a separate letter with an agency that provides
affordable housing.
So that yes, we plan on doing that. And we didn't know which
was the better way of handling it, and we're acceptable either way of
handling that, however the planning commission deems appropriate.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You wait long enough because of the
market, we may be paying you not to do affordable housing.
MR. YOV ANOVICH: I know that's a joke and I hope that it
stays to be a joke.
Anything else before I turn it over to Wayne?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else before we talk to Mr.
Arnold?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Nope. Thank you.
MR. YOV ANOVICH: Thank you.
MR. ARNOLD: Good morning. Wayne Arnold.
I wanted to touch on the couple of deviations that were requested
that staff did not support.
Page 86
.- ~
1, ;;" i i jf
~i:",i; f ""-"j'
'= 'December 6, 2007
We requested a deviation from the standard right-of-way width
for this project from 60 feet down to 40 feet.
Your staff, in the various comments that we received back and
forth over the past several months, we had no idea that staff was not
supportive of that deviation request.
And upon receiving the staff report, we're obviously concerned
that they didn't support the request. We had several examples that both
Rich and I and my assistant have just independently have worked on.
And I came up with seven projects that I've been involved in that have
been approved for that deviation down to 40 feet. Keeping in mind
that we have an infill project, we're trying to go ahead and shape this
in between a developed community. And we know that that standard
can work.
To give you an example, one of the more recent infill projects
that you heard was V ornado, which was over by the Glades. We were
approved with a minimum 40-foot right-of-way for that project.
Rich and I were involved in a project for WCI Communities on
the south end of Livingston Road called Manchester Square. That too
was approved with a 40-foot right-of-way.
Lands End Preserve that's off of Tower Road behind Eagle
Creek, that project was approved with local roads 40 feet.
Copper Cove Preserve, a project that's just north of Fiddler's
Creek and off of Collier Boulevard was approved with local streets of
40 feet in width.
Orange Blossom Ranch, a mixed used project in the Orangetree
area was approved with a reduced right-of-way to 40 feet.
Our neighboring Mediterra community was approved with
private road rights-of-way of 40 feet.
And our clients have developed property in the Pelican Marsh
community, and that PUD as well has reductions to 40 feet for local
roads.
So it's a standard that we know can work and it allows some
Page 87
.'
161
A 4
December 6, 2007
flexibility in design for us and for the product type that we're
developing. I don't believe it's contrary to anything that's happening in
the neighborhood, and it certainly doesn't become, I think, any type of
safety standard for something that's serving 43 lots.
So I would hope that you can support our deviation and override
staffs objection to that, based on the fact that it has been approved on
other cases and we can demonstrate that it can function properly.
This probably will not be a public road network, it would be
private, and again, not requiring the standard types of utility issues and
dedications to the county.
The other objection to a deviation request was to have a
sidewalk on only one side of our cul-de-sac. Staff did not support that.
We had offered that we would pay in lieu of for the second side of the
sidewalk into the county's fund. They didn't support it. I'm not quite
sure on the justification.
There was discussion in the staff report that alluded to that this
would become an overcrowded community. And I think our clients
actually took some very recent photos.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, Wayne, I think the words were
overcrowded neighborhood character and overstuffed residential
neighborhood. And since staff has opined that a 2.57 unit per acre
project is overcrowded and overstuffed, I would hope that we never
see another project in this county above 2.57 acres.
MR. ARNOLD: If! can direct your attention to the visualizer,
that is a project called Terrabella, and it is in Pelican Marsh. It's a
cul-de-sac street system. It shows a sidewalk on one side. That's one
streetscape. It doesn't appear to be an overcrowded streetscape to me.
I can give you another view. I mean, I think it looks like a
typical single-family and villa neighborhood, which it is, very similar
product desired to be placed in the Pezzetino Di Cielo project.
Just another streetscape shot down the cul-de-sac.
Closer in view of the type of attached villa product that has been
Page 88
/11 6
.& (;) 6 ,. F. 1+
December 6, 2007
constructed by our clients. They're attached with privacy walls and
some other attachments for the accessory structures, but it provides a
different style for living on these on smaller lots. You get a lot of
product, no doubt about it, for the lot. But I don't think that the
reduction of the sidewalk or the right-of-way results in an
overcrowded and overstuffed neighborhood that's out of character
with anything else you're seeing. I think these are fine examples of
very beautiful projects, and they command very high prices of
neighborhoods that they're built within.
I have some other examples, again, in Pelican Marsh. A Grand
Isle community. Very similar product. But you get the sense that this
doesn't look like an overcrowded neighborhood to me. It's a very nice
single- family neighborhood.
So I would hope that we could get beyond this. I think that there
are other projects that have been approved with the right-of-way
widths and the single side of the sidewalk. You know, frankly, a
43-unit subdivision to me shouldn't warrant a sidewalk anyway. If you
notice on those pictures, those were taken yesterday in the late
afternoon. I don't see another car on the streets or a person walking on
them.
So, I mean, the character of these neighborhoods, they're
primarily seasonal, they're not heavily used, they're not typically
family neighborhoods, they're more adult-oriented neighborhoods.
And in this particular case, having the sidewalk on one side seems
more than adequate for the streetscape.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: The pictures you've just shown
us, how many units per acre are those?
MR. ARNOLD: Probably in the same range. I mean, the
communities vary, but Pelican Marsh overall is approved at around
three units an acre, I think. I can look that up on a PUD list. But this
isn't a much higher or lower density per se than --e
Page 89
..' A
1 ~eLmber 6~007
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: So it's somewhat equal?
MR. ARNOLD: Pretty similar. Mediterra adjacent to us is a
good example. You'll find certain local streets where they have -- they
were before the days of deviations, but their cross sections allowed
certain cul-de-sacs to have sidewalks, certain cul-de-sacs had one side,
certain local streets had sidewalks on one side.
I don't think they were at the time required to pay into a fund,
but part of our deviation was the ability to pay into the county's fund
and let them use the money where it better fits the community.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I just wanted to make sure
these are a fair comparison, and they are.
MR. ARNOLD: I think they are. I certainly think they are.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other questions of the applicant?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I do.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And it's -- one thing. Wayne,
when you show these things, what are the setbacks for the buildings?
Are they comparable to this project?
I mean, we have a situation here where you could put a side
entrance garage 10 feet, which essentially would put it right on the
edge of your utility easement. And can you plant landscape in the
utility easement?
MR. ARNOLD: I don't know about planting in the utility
easement, but I think that generally speaking if we're going to go to
the smaller lot product, you probably aren't going to find too many
side-loaded garages if we go down to the 50-foot standard. It's just
very impractical to provide the backing and turning movements into
that.
But I will tell you that for the front-loaded garages, we're going
to have to be 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk. And certainly,
though, within the 10 feet that would be in the front yard. I don't see a
scenario where we would be placing the side-entry garage if we went
Page 90
{, .:
tdLU
".'~ 4
. '"
December 6, 2007
that route 10 feet from the right-of-way line because of the easements
that we would have to also deal with.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The product we're looking at
here, what is its front setback at?
MR. ARNOLD: The product you see there, I believe -- I can't
say for sure. It's either 20 on the side that has no sidewalk or I believe
it's 23 on the side where there is a sidewalk. I had a photo where it
actually shows vehicles parked in front in the Terrabella project. Let
me show you that. I didn't show you that on the visualizer.
See, there are a couple of vehicles parked in the driveways on
the left side of the screen. It shows that there's adequate room between
the setback they provided. And I believe the standards are very similar
in Pelican Marsh for what we've proposed here.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But the 23 is only at a garage?
MR. ARNOLD: That's to the face of the garage, yes.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And your setback is 20 for a
building?
MR. ARNOLD: Correct. But if we have a sidewalk, it's required
to be 23 feet. The footnote number two provides for the back of
sidewalk at least 23 feet to the garage --
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: From a garage door, not from a
primary structure.
MR. ARNOLD: Correct.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And one thing, while we're
looking at number two, you have that 20 feet only ifthere's a
sidewalk. Could we also add to that or back of curve, in case there's
not a sidewalk?
In other words, do you want 20 feet from a garage door on the
side of the street without the sidewalk?
MR. ARNOLD: Let me think about that for a moment and I'll
give you an answer. Let me have our client contemplate that to see if
that makes any material change to what they hope to do.
Page 91
16' A: 4
December 6, 2007
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Another question. So essentially
we're going to be 30 feet from the center line and we have a 35-foot
height that we could build to. That could be a problem, I think.
Number four, footnote four on the development standards, some
of the things that I'm not sure about is you can encroach into the
adjoining -- you see my concern is you're allowing people to encroach
if the unit owner allows you. Obviously there's no unit owner, so it
would be designed with that encroachment, I assume.
But what is that you're actually describing to have happen?
MR. ARNOLD: I have a photo that may describe that for you,
Mr. Schiffer.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Wayne, when you talk, you have to be
on the speaker. It's hard to record your comments.
MR. ARNOLD: Let me go back to this one. It's hard to make
out, but in this location, between those two structures is a six-foot high
privacy wall that provides for a courtyard on the interior of that wall
that is utilized by one of those structures. There would be a like
courtyard on the next side for these attached structures.
That also carries forward to the rear of the structure where they
might have a pool or a pool enclosure where you would have a
privacy wall that could be actually on the property line, where you
have the screen enclosures that come and meet on that privacy wall.
That was how that's intended.
It's comparable language to others you've seen. I know that
Mediterra, Pelican Marsh, some of the other communities have
utilized a standard that allows this encroachment language. And I
think that encroachment language is there primarily so that there can
be maintenance easements that are authorized for the continued
maintenance of those facilities.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Why wouldn't you just put the
property line essentially down the centerline of that wall or on the
outside of it or something?
Page 92
UtJnbe: 6, 2~)7'l
MR. ARNOLD: Because in some cases the product doesn't have
just a linear wall that's parallel to that property line. There may be
indentations in and out where there could be the structure built
actually on the property line. In other cases it would be offset from the
property line. But the accessory structures typically would have that
attachment, at least through the privacy wall there that would go
across the property line in the front and rear.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay, that seems -- and then
people would be measuring off of a property line as the wall is come
across. So I mean, that seems --
MR. ARNOLD: Right, that would be -- I mean, ifthere's an
easier way to say it, I'm happy to do so. I guess the intent of the
language was to allow something similar to this, where you would
have privacy walls and accessory structures that would be allowed to
have these encroachments up to and on those property lines.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And the benefit, I guess, being
that if you followed that wall with a property line, your setbacks
would be subject to following that regular property line, I guess.
I mean, if no one has a problem with it, I have no problem with
it.
The -- can you show that one picture you have that showed
Mediterra, the aerial photograph?
MR. ARNOLD: Sure.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And so our preserve will not be
contiguous with their preserves?
MR. ARNOLD: No, it's not.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Thank you.
The other issue is the cul-de-sac. The concern I have is that if a
fire -- emergency vehicle comes into this development, there's really
not enough space for it to turn around prior to the gate. So if they are
in the wrong development, they have to, I guess, go through the gate,
go all the way down, turn around at the end of the cul-de-sac.
Page 93
lSc(ier ~ 2007
Is there a way you could put at least aT-turn or something prior
to the entrance to the gate?
MR. ARNOLD: I think we've designed one. If you look closely,
we have an area that's shown as a utility easement to the north
property line, just north of the preserve, on our master plan.
We've worked with the county to provide the potential for a
pump station at that location. And you could come in and we have to
provide a turnout for the county to get its utility vehicles in. So there is
an opportunity, I think, to -- it would be a backing movement, but I
think that would be acceptable to the fire department to make that
movement.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: It looks a little small now, but if
you could just do that, so that if they are in the wrong development,
they can get out. If they are -- this is the right development, the
lengthy cul-de-sac is not an issue.
MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, I'm certain we can accommodate that.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: That's it. Thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein, then Ms. Caron.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: First of all, we are going to
have driveways of23 feet, aren't we?
MR. ARNOLD: Yes.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: All of them?
MR. ARNOLD: I think the driveways are all going to be -- if
you take it to the edge of the pavement, they certainly would be. But
where you have a sidewalk we have to be 23 feet to our garage door to
provide adequate parking.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: On this idea ofa sidewalk
itself, I see no reason for you to have two of them. It doesn't make
sense. First of all, because of the size of this.
Second of all, you're trying to make it feel comfortable. And in
doing so, I would say even if you wanted it to do for good, for the
actual look and appeal of it on one side of the sidewalk is absolutely
Page 94
7 ~.
t:.- " Ii lJ.
December 6, 2007
correct. Otherwise it gets a little bit out of line for something 42 or 43
units.
MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, I think that it's a difficult thing for people
to understand. But if you live in a community that does or doesn't have
sidewalks, there are a large number of people who really don't want
the sidewalk in their front yard. It takes away from an area that can be
landscaped. And it does.
There's a certain curb appeal that it's just -- it's something that
some people really desire. And for those who don't want to live in a
community that would have dual sidewalks, I would hope that they
would go find a community that offered them, if we're allowed to have
this deviation.
But otherwise, you're going to go know going in when the road
is constructed whether or not you have a sidewalk. And if they choose
to live on the side that would have the sidewalk, that's great. If they
didn't, they would have an option to live on the side that might end up
with a little bit more green space.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: That's correct.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Arnold, could you put up that
last picture that you had with the villa? I think it's in Pelican Marsh.
MR. ARNOLD: Was it this one that showed -- you can't really
see that.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Right, that's the one.
First of all, this is an attached situation. And your PUD, it's not
for attached villas, correct?
MR. ARNOLD: This is technically an attached villa. And we
would do something -- our attached product would be very similar to
this.
COMMISSIONER CARON: That's not what your PUD says.
MR. ARNOLD: Maybe we can look at the development
standards. This would be --
Page 95
ID~L~er 6,~007
COMMISSIONER CARON: Says single-family detached and
zero lot line detached.
MR. ARNOLD: Right, these are zero lot line detached because
the principal structures on that product are not attached. You have the
accessory structures that are the attached component of that villa
product.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: That's what I asked you.
MR. ARNOLD: And again, ifthere's another way to express that
that makes it more clear, I'm happy to do so.
COMMISSIONER CARON: So in other words, this building
that I'm looking at right here, that's one or two units?
MR. ARNOLD: You're looking at the garage face that's there
with the vegetation on it, one unit. And to the right --
COMMISSIONER CARON: To the left?
MR. ARNOLD: -- on the screen is another unit.
COMMISSIONER CARON: To the right is another unit.
MR. ARNOLD: You see the vegetation between it--
COMMISSIONER CARON: Thank you, okay.
MR. ARNOLD: And that attachment on this particular model,
the attachments are the accessory structures over and across those lot
lines. And you end up with a 10- foot separation between the principal
structures.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay, that's what I thought.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Are there any other questions of
the applicant?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Hearing none, we'll ask for a staff
report.
And Melissa did this, you're kind of filling in, right?
MR. BELLOWS: Correct. Yes, for the record, Ray Bellows.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any questions of staff?
(No response.)
Page 96
16 iii 4
December 6, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'll make it easy for you, Ray, because I
know you're probably not prepared to do a presentation. Well, one
may not be needed.
MR. BELLOWS: I appreciate that. Just for the record, I just
want to put on one note in regards to the deviations. I did discuss the
deviations with Melissa Zone, who's the planner.
And the deviation process is one that where the standards that
are being deviated from it, if they are intended to be applicable on
every instance, then those would be the standards that would be the
ones that would be the normal permitted standards and not ones -- so
therefore, deviations wouldn't be required.
And I think it was her opinion, based on -- or her research into
the project that those deviations would reduce or enlarge the footprints
of the buildings and not providing for pedestrian safety.
But the photos, information depicted by the applicant I think
shows that they can work. And ifhe's committing to a development
such as that, I don't have an objection to that.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ray, I think it would be wise if we
avoided terminology that we can't support in the LDC from the
discussion that's used to either to be in favor or against any deviation.
Overcrowding and overstuffed are not terms in the LDC defined.
If there's an incompatibility issue, then fine. But I think we ought
to avoid that kind of terminology. It's ambiguous and doesn't provide a
clear reference to the LDC for a turn down reason, so -- any other
comments of staff?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Do we have any public speakers, Ray?
MR. BELLOWS: No one has registered.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: With that, there's no need for rebuttal
then, thankfully.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Mark, let me just state
something. I asked Wayne to check out something that doesn't make
Page 97
., " , It
.::~ ::
;'''. . J '
~ "" .
4
December 6, 2007
sense, and that is that ifthe garage was on the side without the
sidewalk, there's no way you could get it closer than 25 feet to the
sidewalk, so it's a moot question.
I think it's actually a stupid question I asked.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You don't want to admit that for the
record, Brad.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So the point is, I just don't want
Wayne to waste time trying to figure that one out.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you for the clarification, sir.
Ms. Caron?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Just one thing for Mr. Yovanovich
before we go to a motion. There's been a lot of reference to how well
you've been working with your neighbors at Mediterra. The
landscaping that you have in front of your project, the planned
landscaping, will it be like Mediterra?
MR. YOV ANOVICH: Oh, yes.
COMMISSIONER CARON: So that as we drive down
Livingston, I'm not going to know essentially where Mediterra ends
and where your project picks up?
MR. YOV ANOVICH: Other than signage.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Other than the signage, yes. Thank
you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, no other questions, we'll close the
public hearing and entertain a motion. Anybody have a motion?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I'll make a motion --
COMMISSIONER CARON: I'll make a--
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein, I think, was first, then
we'll go to Ms. Caron.
Mr. Adelstein?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I move that
PUDZ-2005-AR-8416 be forwarded to the Board of County
Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, subject to staff
Page 98
-
. j/(; ~.
c~becember 6,io07
recommendations.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, we need a second before we can
go into discussion. I don't think we -- most of us here don't seem -- I
don't think we're going to be supporting staff recommendations, but
let's see ifthere's a second with it that way.
Is there a second?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, motion dies for lack ofa second.
Ms. Caron, do you have a motion?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Yes, I'll make a motion for
approval for PUDZ-2005-AR-8416, and with the following
conditions.
I believe that the deviations that were listed are appropriate and
we're going to also add deviation D, which is for the 1 ,OOO-foot --
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Minimum tangent.
COMMISSIONER CARON: -- minimum cul-de-sacs. There is
$1,000 a unit for affordable housing. They have offered to pay in lieu
for the second side sidewalk. And we made certain changes to the
development services -- to the development standards table. And let
me try to find those.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Six-foot and--
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray --
COMMISSIONER CARON: Side yards setbacks were six feet.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: For single-family.
COMMISSIONER CARON: For single-family. Which would
make it 12 for -- we've taken out deviation -- I'm sorry, 12 for
minimum distance between principal structures. We've taken out
footnote number seven. And, yes, and the height of course is zoned
height.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That agrees with my notes, too.
COMMISSIONER CARON: I think that was everything that we
talked about.
Page 99
~,
'" ,!
'II "
16decem~er 6:1007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Before we go into discussion, let's have
a second. Is there a second?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I will second that.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein seconded that. Now
discussion.
Mr. Klatzkow, what's your issue?
MR. KLA TZKOW: Just for purposes of clarity, since this is
going to be a PUD stipulation, they're paying in lieu of the sidewalks.
When will the payment be made?
COMMISSIONER CARON: When do we normally require that,
at CO?
MR. KLATZKOW: It's part of the PUD, so we're making a
change to what we're normally doing. It could be CO is fine, building
permit is fine.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: CO is fine.
MR. YOV ANOVICH: CO is fine with us.
COMMISSIONER CARON: I'm sure it is. I'm asking when we
normally do these things.
MR. YOV ANOVICH: We would expect it at plat.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Plat. Thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, it would be at plat approval.
COMMISSIONER CARON: So at plat.
MR. YOV ANOVICH: That's what we expected, yes.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So there's been a change to the payment
in lieu of. The stipulation would be a payment in lieu of for the second
sidewalk at the time of plat.
Does the motion maker accept it?
COMMISSIONER CARON : Yes.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And does the second accept it?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Yes.
MR. YOV ANOVICH: As part of the short comment, we should
get CO, don't you think?
Page 100
'1,'''' A
dl . December It, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You don't want to complicate this any
more.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Really.
MS. STUDENT-STIRLING: I also want clarification on the
affordable housing payment that we use, our typical language, and that
it's credited against any further fees and so on, the typical language
that we use.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is that acceptable to the motion maker?
COMMISSIONER CARON: Absolutely.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Second accept it?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Yes, it is.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Mr. Schiffer?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I just want to add, you know,
the one thing you have in there, the deviation on the cul-de-sac length,
I would like to add into that sentence, if acceptable fire department
turnaround is at the entrance. In other words, that length wouldn't be a
good idea if you couldn't turn around prior to entering that.
COMMISSIONER CARON: I think they've already covered that
in their county easement turnaround right at the entrance, right?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The layouts that they show on
this exhibit wouldn't make it. It's close. I think they can get it. I don't
think it's a hardship.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Brad, the only problem you might want
to consider with that is, if that was up to county staff to make that
decision I think that would be fine. But when you've got a dozen
different fire departments, each having a different idea of what size
truck they may want to turn around, it could get rather complicated for
the applicant to get it figured out.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: There is a county standard for
the turnaround, and it's part of the cul-de-sac requirements. Either the
50-foot outside diameter radius or it's a T-turn, which I think would
work better in this case, which they can make.
Page 101
j~ .. ~'. 11
December 6, 2007
I mean, the reasons we have lengths of cul-de-sac is to prevent
emergency vehicles from being trapped. And especially something
that has such narrow right-of-ways, they'd have no other way to get
out of there but go all the way down to the end.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, Mr. Arnold?
MR. ARNOLD: Again, Wayne Arnold.
I think as we stated on the record, we can and would provide an
appropriate fire turnaround. And I don't know exactly how that's going
to be configured.
I think Mr. Strain's correct, the fire departments all have a little
bit different standard. But it's not always a cul-de-sac. We've found
that they've allowed hammerhead type turns and stabilized
turnarounds and various things.
So I think the provision for us to do it, we certainly will and can.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I have no problem with that.
Ms. Caron accept it as a--
COMMISSIONER CARON: Absolutely.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does the second accept it?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN : Yes.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anything else in this discussion phase?
Mr. Vigliotti?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Just a real quick note. I'm
Italian and I have a real tough time pronouncing the name. I'd like to
see a shorter name, if nothing, for the sign purposes in front of the
street.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Pezzetino Di Cielo --
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'm Italian and I have a
problem with it.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You guys, we're on record here.
Ray, did staff get all that information?
MR. BELLOWS: I just want to go over it. It's being approved
subject to the requested deviations by the applicant, plus the additional
Page 102
16r~'" A h
December 6, 2007
deviation for cul-de-sac length. Then we're also having a condition
that the elimination of the sidewalk would be paid for in lieu of at the
time of plat approval.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right.
MR. BELLOWS: And we're also to add the language to credit if
there's a fee increase.
Then there's a change to the development standards table for
single- family structures. The side yard setback is six feet and the
distance between structures is 12 feet.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right.
MR. BELLOWS: And you're eliminating footnote number
seven. And then on the building, zoned height, we're going to make
sure it says zoned height.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You missed the affordable housing.
MR. BELLOWS: Affordable housing.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And it would be the standard language
that's utilized.
I would think for record purposes we ought to make that by
letter in lieu of in the PUD. Does anybody have a preference on this
panel, since the applicant offered either way?
I think it would be safer to do it by letter.
MR. BELLOWS: Can you say that again?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The applicant offered to make the
commitment to the 1,000 stipulation by letter instead of incorporating
the language in the PUD.
MS. STUDENT-STIRLING: He has to do it in the PUD.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: He has to do it in the PUD?
MS. STUDENT-STIRLING: We always to it in the PUD.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I know we always do. But there's been
some concern over the --
MR. KLATZKOW: I've got a better ability to enforce that if it's
in the PUD than if it's outside the PUD.
Page 103
'i t r~!
Jc OJ fit. "4
December 6, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, then that's the way it will be. Just
trying to clean it up. But that's okay, we'll leave it dirty.
Anybody else have anything?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, we'll call for the vote. All those
in favor, signifY by saying aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Anybody opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 7-0.
Thank you. And we will take a IS-minute break. We'll come
back at noon. I think we'll finish up easily the boat dock and we'll be
closed for the day. So we'll be back at 12:00. Thank you.
(Recess.)
Item #8C
PETITION: BD-2007-AR-12154, SAUNDRA CLANCY-
KOENDARFER
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Please take your seats. Nick is leaving
us. He doesn't feel he can contribute to a boat amendment. We're at a
loss now.
But the next petition up is BD-2007-AR-12154, and it's Saundra
Clancy-Koendarfer, represented by Ben Nelson, boat dock up in Little
Hickory Shores.
Page 104
16 J A 4
December 6, 2007
With that, are there any disclosures on the part of the planning
commission?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, how about let's swear in those
that are wishing to speak on behalf of this petition. I did it backwards.
(Speakers was duly sworn.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. And with that, we'll ask the
applicant for a presentation.
MR. NELSON: Good morning -- or good afternoon, whoops,
there we go. Thank you for your patience this morning. I appreciate
the job you're doing up there, and I have a real appreciation of what
you do, actually.
The applicant, Mrs. Koendarfer, and her husband, what their
plan is here, if you have drawings that show that, is that they want to
replace an existing dock that extends approximately 20 feet out into
the water and is approximately 15 foot from the property line. They
want to replace that with a dock that extends 25 feet out into the water
and has a boat lift on the front of it.
So actually, and I will put this on -- what this drawing does, this
drawing shows the existing dock lighter and it shows the proposed
dock right there.
And also, you're going to notice here -- also you'll notice here
that this is the adjacent property owner. There is the approximate
location of their porch on this side. And this is kind of a line of view
that would go across from this comer over across where the existing
dock is.
And because we've moved this other dock, this is what our
recommendation to the client was, was also to move it over to where it
was a conforming dock to where it was 25 feet off instead of 15 feet
off. And the actual dock extends only about five feet out further than
the existing dock.
So instead of putting a boat lift right in front of this dock, we
Page 105
qj If. ,
: 'e} ~
~~ce~b:r'6, 2~7 '
decided to redo the dock, move it over, go out five more feet to get to
the better water depth, and then add the lift onto it. And that's
essentially it for the boat dock.
I'd just like to comment on the reasons for doing this. Naples and
Collier County, I think you've all been at the forefront of maintaining
in front of these -- in these natural areas, and even on canals,
maintaining a good benthic resource in front of these walls. And one
of the ways to do it is that back in the past, even on the bays, when
somebody would put a seawall in they would dig it out and dig it out
to depth, and then you would have nothing in front of these seawalls.
And I think that, like I said, Naples and Collier County has been
at the forefront of maintaining these now.
And this wall here, the existing wall has some rip-rap at the base
of it. It has a nice gradual slope. It has some benthic resources, which
would be some oyster shells and some other things out.
And we have an aerial that really kind of shows -- I hope it
shows up. I think you can see on -- maybe you can see. Really light,
you can see where this -- the bar comes out right here, the actual
water, edge of the water that's the deep water. You can see the rip-rap
at the base of the wall, just behind the dock, and you can see this edge
of this water. That's what we're trying to get out in front of, well in
front of, because that's at the end of where those resources are.
So anyway, the goal was to go ahead and get enough water
depth to where we would have adequate water depth for the boat that
they presently have and for the future boat lift, and also to move it
away from the adjacent property owner so that it wouldn't be as much
in the view there.
And basically I think that's all I have to say, unless you have
some questions.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron, then Mr. Murray.
COMMISSIONER CARON: How will you affect -- by moving
this dock, how will you affect those oyster beds that are there?
Page 106
161
A 4
December 6, 2007
MR. NELSON: What we're doing is we're going out, we're
going further out over that. The walkway will be in a different area,
but going out further out is the best way to do it, because what we're
trying to do is to get the boat into an area to where we won't disturb
any of that.
The worst problem that we have in a lot of these shallow water
areas, if you put your dock in too shallow water, you know that
automatically your client is going to be prop dredging, trying to move
oyster shells out of the way of the boat. The boat lift is going to
continually bottom out and you're going to cause turbidity and all
types of stuff.
So really, long-term solution, the best way to do this is to go
ahead and go out to deeper water so that boat never does kick up
turbidity, it allows that bottom to go ahead and be a good part of the
ecosystem there. So that's our goal.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: The picture that we're looking at
right now on the visualizer, the -- that's the present boat dock, is it
not?
MR. NELSON: Yes, sir. And there's a boat moored at the front
of it.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I see that, yes.
And you have a line that you put on there that shows the person's
vision from the next door; is that correct?
MR. NELSON: Approximately, yes.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Well, if you were to
superimpose the new dock and push that boat out the distance
associated with the new dock, wouldn't that line of vision be
obstructed?
MR. NELSON: Well, what happens is, though, we come another
10 feet this way. So if we go from here, the actual dock would be out
another five feet. So that line would be right about there, would be
Page 107
':';'
i~
4
December 6, 2007
,.
exactly where the front of the boat would be.
So actually, it wouldn't be any -- and that's what we showed on
the previous drawing.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Well, that's what I'm relating to.
The previous drawing, when -- because you didn't have it marked off
for the new location. Why don't you put that back up then, please.
And I'm not disagreeing with you, I just want to be clear on it
because ofthe old dock.
MR. NELSON: So here's the old dock right there.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: The old dock there. And you're
saying to me that's being moved five feet; is that it?
MR. NELSON: We've moving it actually--
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Ten feet--
MR. NELSON: Ten to 12 feet, actually, because this dock
actually goes at an angle here.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay, you're making me feel
more comfortable when you use the word 12, maybe even 13. Because
I would say to you if you're going to be concerned for the vision of the
people next door, then you need to come more center to the property.
MR. NELSON: Right. And like I said, this dock comes at an
angle. So it's 10 feet here, but actually if you go out here where the
riparian line is, it moves over some. And if you recall, the boat -- the
boat -- actually, I'm going to draw on this. The front of the boat was
actually right there.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yeah, I appreciate it. That's what
drew my attention to it, especially when you put a lift on there and
that size boat.
MR. NELSON: And so when we get over into this area, the boat
would be approximately like this.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Thank you.
MR. NELSON: So I don't think that -- I really think there's a
good argument to be made that it doesn't worsen that part of that view.
Page 108
16 be~mb~ 6, 2007
But I think really that my concern when we design these things
is that I think that we need to look at the environmental challenges
here first, that we really need to start taking better care of our
resources.
So far as dredging in these areas, really the DEP or anything,
they're not going to allow you to do any dredging here, mainly
because you have an option. They're going to tell you go out a little
further and don't do any harm to the environment and keep this littoral
zone intact right here.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron?
COMMISSIONER CARON: The proposed deck area, it is
essentially doubling in size. Is that necessary? Or could you lessen the
overall extension by making that, the proposed platform, narrower?
MR. NELSON: Well, you certainly could narrow it up. I would
say that the waterward section of that, the waterward line, the edge of
the boat lift needs to stay where it is. But I think that you could narrow
that dock up. In other words, right where the boat is moored out is the
important point to get to.
So you could go eight feet with it, you know, and narrow it up
by two feet, but it would actually be the back that moves towards the
open water, if you see what I mean. Where the boat actually sits is the
important part for the mooring. And maybe I can show you on the
drawing.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay, because you do actually
have depth there now. I mean, all you have to do is take a look at your
neighbor to the east. They're only 19 feet out and they've got a lift and
they're --
MR. NELSON: But if you'll look at this aerial again, you can
see -- you see this line, and I'm going to draw the line along the edge
of that. Thanks.
You'll see it actually curves like this. And I'm not sure what the
water depth is like in this in here, but I have an idea by looking at the
Page 109
'1 i, I' ft,:
",g < .t;'-
Decembh 6, 2007
back end of this that it's probably not -- I know it's not as good as the
water depth out here.
And if you come back into here, we have a topographical survey
that shows that the existing dock, the front is like .3 to .35. That's
really not quite adequate for the type of boat that we visualize being
moored here. And we would rather be in that minus four to minus five.
And I think a lot of you, when you see these come in, that's
generally the goal, is to be at that minus four to minus five. Especially
when you have a boat lift, and that boat lift cradle itself can be
anywhere from 10 inches thick to 12 inches thick to support that boat.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Well, again, one of the things we
were trying to protect in these waterways here, because we're in a
shallow backwater area, is that we don't have boats that are too large
for the backwaters.
MR. NELSON: Right.
COMMISSIONER CARON: And so by moving out to a depth
that will just allow you to have a larger boat is not a goal for this panel
or, you know, should it be. We shouldn't be lessening our standards
just to accommodate larger boats in an area where it may not be
appropriate.
MR. NELSON: I agree. And I don't think that this lessens the
standards at all. I really don't.
COMMISSIONER CARON: I'm comfortable with what I see.
MR. NELSON: Thank you very much.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: This is -- waterway is 640 feet wide
there?
MR. NELSON: It's 640 feet, approximately.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And you're looking at 37 feet.
Have your neighbors complained?
MR. NELSON: I think we have had a complaint about the view.
That's why I mentioned the view. The neighbor to the east has made a
complaint about the view there. And that's why I put this drawing up.
Page 110
161 A 4
December 6, 2007
And I know that there's concern, and I'm not going to say that
the neighbor shouldn't be concerned. I mean, neighbors have a right to
be concerned, so I don't want to -- I just want to show you on this
drawing, this is their boat dock right here. This is different for me
here. Sorry. There we go.
This is their boat dock right here. This is their porch and their
lanai right here.
And I think their concern was is that because if we went straight
out with this dock right here the way it was, it was going to get further
into this view. But actually -- and I'm not sure that they were aware of
it or not, they may have well been aware of it, but we are moving it
over, too.
So I think the line of view -- I think a good argument is to be
made is that because of that, we're going to stay approximately in the
same line of view as we are now.
And if you'll notice right here, we have some photographs, but
right in here, the reason that we don't crowd this over, right in here
there's a lot of vegetation. Pretty substantial vegetation right along this
site here that pretty much blocks this view here, the upland view. So
that's why we drew this line across the bow ofthis.
This one is probably more of the concern. And because of where
their own boat dock is right here, we kind of drew the line across from
where that blocked that view.
So I don't know if that's a fair representation or not, but it's the
best I could come up with.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Are there any other questions?
Mr. Schiffer?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And Ray, this is kind ofto you,
is that given them the larger deck area, it would be nice if they would
cover it. There's nothing we do today that gives them the ability to put
a boathouse cover on it or something; isn't that right?
MR. BELLOWS: That's correct.
Page 111
161
A "
fi.
' /~
December 6, 2007
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So they would have to come
back if they wanted to do that?
MR. NELSON: Absolutely. And then I think the county's
criteria on boathouses and the setbacks on boathouses and the criteria
for view really comes into play majorly then.
So I would see little or no chance of that happening.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other questions of the applicant?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is there a staff report?
THE COURT REPORTER: May I have your name, please?
MR. NELSON: Oh, I'm sorry.
For the record, Ben Nelson.
MS. CASERTA: Hi. Ashley Caserta, Senior Planner for the
record.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Did you cut your hair?
MS. ASHTON: Yes, I did.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You look totally different. It looks very
nIce.
MS. ASHTON: Thank you.
No report. Staff does recommend approval. If you have any
questions for me.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any questions of staff?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, thank you very much.
Ray, do we have any public speakers?
MR. BELLOWS: Yes, we have one registered speaker. James C.
Welch.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Welch, if you could approach one
of the podiums. Thank you for your patience today. I'm sorry the
schedule got changed around.
MR. WELCH: Thank you for seeing me. I appreciate it.
THE COURT REPORTER: Were you sworn in?
Page 112
.,",,' J' A',J,
,;i~ bDl~e~ber 6, 2007
MR. WELCH: No, I wasn't.
(Speaker was duly sworn.)
MR. WELCH: I have three current pictures, one, two, three, that
will make some sense. And I also took the liberty of taking the Collier
appraiser's.
I'm not a public speaker, but I'm rather confused why a 37-foot
protrusion is necessary when the maximum permitted protrusion is 20
feet as the norm.
As the three pictures demonstrate, in my opinion, you know, the
docks all along the side are not protruding 37 feet, and they're
considerably large boats connected to them, as my neighbors, which
has a V -bottom boat and doesn't have the need to be out that far.
In my opinion, this will leave -- it will have a major impact on
my westerly view and sunsets I look forward to.
As I see it, there will be a boat hoisted on a lift 25 to 37 feet out
in the water, which I think also compromises the existing customary
channel of navigation, which is along the seawall. I don't understand
why it's necessary to hoist the boat 25 feet from the seawall, as the
pictures show. Other boats are not.
I would appreciate clarification on the purpose. I haven't gotten
it with the depth. I'm asking members of the board to consider the
relevance of size of dock versus depth of water. It appears to me that
three-and-a-half feet at low tide is plenty of depth for a vessel.
I'm also questioning why depth was measured at my property
line, as shown in Nelson's rendering, rather than petitioner's proposed
site of construction.
To this end, I ask that the present character and simplicity ofthe
neighborhood be preserved. I just don't understand the need for a boat
lift 25 feet from the seawall. I do not see on the documents what the
total elevation of the boat lift will be out there, 25 to 37 feet out.
I'm also concerned that at a future date another lift could be
installed along the IS-foot walkway, which would further impede our
Page 113
16/n '.'
December 6, 2007
VIew.
This graph paper, I represented a foot by each block, and I
actually drew it out exactly the way it comes out to show as it would
be rendered, because I couldn't understand the Nelson Marine
rendering per square footage. So I went and did one myself. And as
you can see, there's a considerable impact on view.
I would just ask if this must be approved, I'm going to request
that the dock be placed further west of my property in preserving my
westerly view, which I cherish greatly and why I chose to be at this
location.
It seems this raises the bar for allowed protrusions. There are
three other protrusions in the bay. One is a public dock, and two of
them are for a condo association at the end of the bay. Other than that,
they don't protrude out this far. For one boat on a lift, it seems like a
considerable amount of protrusion into the bay.
I took the picture also, the boat that's there drafts approximately
six inches. I draft approximately one foot with my boat. And it's no
difficulty, you know, being close to the seawall as I am. That boat
right there is a 17- foot boat that I have, and it draws a foot of water.
Pontoon boats typically draw six inches of water.
And I would ask that the board consider either relocating it
further west or maybe by the side of the dock, rather. But the depth, I
question how the depth would come about, because I stand in the
water out there. Thank you very much.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sir, I have a question. You had -- the
last photograph you showed, I mean, I'm trying to figure out where it
is, because the -- maybe you could show it, it was number three, you
had a number three up in the comer of it. There it is.
That picture shows a canal. Where is that in relationship to this
facility?
MR. WELCH: The canal starts about four or five homes down.
My neighbor is still on the bay, as I am.
Page 114
i 6' . Dec~ber 6, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, I was confused. I remember
seeing the diagram that shows a 640-foot deep bay, and that's why I
couldn't figure out where the canal occurred.
Are there any other questions of the gentleman?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I do, Mark.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Is your concern -- in other
words, there's a couple dimensions that are important. One is to the
edge of the dock itself and then one is to the outside, you know, edge
of the lift. Is your concern more to the edge of the dock or the whole
thing out to the outside edge?
What he's asking for, his dimensions are to the outer edge of that
lift, which is 37 feet. If he pulled the whole thing coming in, what kind
of a number would make you comfortable?
MR. WELCH: Well, if the issue is the depth of the boat, if it was
on the side of the dock, that would be perpendicular to the seawall.
That would be one issue.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Correct.
MR. WELCH: But I don't understand the need to go out that far.
I'm confused, because I stand in the water, I know it's deep enough. I
have -- I know what my area is. And by the county's picture, I know
that there's that band that goes around it, goes against the seawall, but
I also know that if you look at that, that's what I'm going to have to
look forward to in reality, not that sketch that I saw from Nelson
Marine.
And I drew that out, hand sketched one foot for every block.
And that's what I'm going to be looking at, 37 feet out, God knows
how high in the water -- out of the water.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But how many people -- it looks
like the existing boat is docked on the outside edge of their dock now.
MR. WELCH: Yes, but it's in--
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: It doesn't have a lift, it's in the
Page 115
16' A Deltnber 6, 2007
water, right? So your concern is even lifting that boat up, it would lift
it into your view.
MR. WELCH: Right. Well, it's going to be one more
obstruction. There's going to be a protected walkway that's going to
have a rail on it. Then there's going to be a dock that's going to be 10
by 20 out. And then on top of that there's going to be a hoisted boat
that's going to be 25 to 37 feet out into the water, and that totally
blocks my view.
I don't know where somebody thinks it doesn't block my view;
it's apparent from this sketch that I took the time to draw.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And Ray, from our past LDC
work, isn't that boat also able to have a cover on it now?
MR. WELCH: It has a cover.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But I mean, where we came up
with regulations on covers that are supported by pilings. So essentially
wouldn't this be allowed even on top of that boat that there's a cover
sitting out there?
MR. BELLOWS: Correct.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So it's worse than you think.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other questions of the gentleman?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, sir.
MR. WELCH: Thank you.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. By the way, Mr. Klatzkow, do
we have to keep the papers he's shown for record? I think we do.
MR. KLA TZKOW: I think you do.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: If you could give them to the court
reporter here, she'll make sure they're filed.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Shouldn't we accept them as
evidence?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. We each haven't got a copy, Bob,
so let's just leave it like it is.
Page 116
" Dece~ber if 2007
MR. NELSON: Mr. Chairman, would I be allowed to make a
couple more comments?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sure, you can have rebuttal.
MR. NELSON: So far as the water depth, I think a lot of you
remember when it used to be -- water depth used to be a source of
contention, the neighbor would say this, we would say that. So that's
why you started requiring for us to get the staff is to get a certified
surveyor to come in and do the water depths on there. You see this
bathymetric survey actually has the water depths on both sides, in
other words.
And what they did, the reason that they put the lines on both
sides here is so that you could kind of connect the dots and come
across here and see where those lines are. So it kind of takes the
dispute out of it of what the water depth is.
And so far as the other docks in the area -- I'm going to change
this again -- you have this drawing, too. This kind of shows kind of an
example of the docks, just a sampling of the docks.
From my experience as a marine contractor, a lot of the times
these older docks that have been put at 20-foot -- and these don't
include the lifts on here, these are just where the dock is, the
protrusion of the dock, and these are fairly accurate measurements
here. And you'll see that a lot of them are 21, 23, 21, they're all in that
area right there.
A lot of times in the past people have just put the docks in at that
20-something feet, rightly because they don't want to go through this
variance process. They come to us or come to somebody else and they
say, what can we put in? Well, you can go out 20 foot or you can pay
another $2,000 and whatever and we'll take a shot at getting you out
there with a boat lift.
Some people choose not to do that. Some people choose just to
go ahead and do a walk-around dock in the shallow water and deal
with that shallow water.
Page 11 7
)
"":- c: /;1
December 6, 2007
I quite frankly don't think that that's the best case scenario. I
think the best case scenario is to get these boats into deeper water,
because the resource -- I believe that the resource is very important.
Not that the view and everything else isn't important, but most people
have a boat and a dock and a boat lift behind their house that they look
at too from behind their house as well.
And I understand how when you want to look towards the sunset
and you want to look across your neighbor's property that that's a
concern, but I think that shouldn't get in the way of somebody's right
to adequately have safe, reasonable access.
And I think that if you ask your staff if this is safe and
reasonable access and a reasonable request as part of the criteria that
you've set out, I think that you'll find it will be.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein, then Mr. Murray.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: What is the depth that you
have it at now?
MR. NELSON: It's probably -- it's at a bit of an angle to the
shoreline, so I'd say it was at an average of a minus 4.5. What that
translates into is about at low tide, it's about four-and-a-half feet deep
at low tide at the front of the dock.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: And at full tide what is it?
MR. NELSON: At full tide it would probably be six foot. If you
get a foot-and-a-halftide change, it would probably be six-foot deep at
high tide.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Thank you.
MR. NELSON: And so far as the channel also, it's fairly deep. I
think it's fairly deep across there.
The gentleman's right, people have a habit of hugging the
shoreline as they go along there. But there is no marked channel in
this area, mainly because it stays so deep.
This is what I would consider to be a -- you wouldn't call it a
manmade waterway, it's a man-altered waterway. Years ago, in the
Page 11 8
1~ I';'~
December 6, 2007
late] 950's, early] 960's, they went around the area and in some areas
they dug this out by crane. You can see that by aerial photo. It's kind
of interesting, really.
And so right now the whole area's taken 40 to 50 years to kind of
recover environmentally from that. And so what our goal here is just
to try to do something that doesn't hinder that process. And although
we would be -- I have no objection at all to moving it further away to
the west away from the client here, I have no objection to doing that at
all, as long as we don't encroach in the 25 feet from the other side.
I'm sure my applicant has no objection to doing that. But it will
make it go towards the other neighbor we haven't heard from, but
they're not here, so I can't speak for them, that's for sure.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray?
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Mr. Nelson, I think you said
something about improving safety or making sure that there was
safety associated with --
MR. NELSON : Yes.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Does that mean that when the
original community was developed that the 20- foot docks were not
safe?
MR. NELSON: Well, I think that what the goal is to have safe
and reasonable access. And because of the 20-foot dock, when you put
a 20-foot dock in there, if it's too shallow, if you don't have a boat lift,
if you don't have proper access, your boat sits on the bottom or
whatever. I don't think it's considered safe access.
And, you know what, there's a good argument to be made that if
you're not in that deep water depth, and as long as you're able to stay
out of a navigational channel, I think that you've got safe access.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Sir, I'm not going to disagree
with you necessarily, but I will say that one of the pictures that we
saw looking down to that canal seemed to be a very large vessel
behind the vessel that was just in front. And I would say that if the
Page 119
~: t.. ~'A ~
'f-;;; i ,
.."- ,[ . . ece~be 6, 2007
community were planned with the 20-foot there, I recognize there's a
great deal of width in the bay, but a vision -- you know, somebody's
view is important, and the community character is important.
And ordinarily I wouldn't take umbrage, but we have somebody
who's indicating it's directly impacting. And even I noted that it
looked to me like when you put that other vessel out there, and you
made a statement earlier on indicating the vessel they want to put
there, which means that they have in mind something other than the
vessel we're looking at right now --
MR. NELSON: Sure, most people do.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: -- which would be considerably
larger.
MR. NELSON: It could be.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Presumably. So I don't know, I
thought that these were safe the way they were. Ijust caught that and
wondered about your choice of the word there.
MR. NELSON: And towards the other end of the canal there,
where the picture was taken down there in the canal, the character of
that canal changes. As you get down further towards the mouth of that
canal, the water depth increases towards the seawall. As you can see
by the drawing, the water depth increases towards the seawall, it gets
deeper, so you're able to come back in there further.
Also, as you get to that canal, you're limited. That canal is only
80 feet wide. You're limited to 20 feet, and that's all you'll ever be able
to do. So that's what they have to live with. And being a manmade
canal then towards that end, you're able to dredge there. So there's a
lot of reasons why it changes as it gets down towards that way right
there.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: From the point of land to the
water, how far out would it be for three feet of water?
MR. NELSON: Right now the dock is 20 feet out, and it's at 3.5
Page 120
161 A
December 6, 2007
feet. So the existing dock. So right now if she just left the boat the way
it is, she's in three-and-a-halffeet of water.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: How long would it be if it
was just three feet?
MR. NELSON: It appears -- it says right here that it's at minus
two point -- see, it drops off rather rapidly. At 15 feet out it's minus
2.3. At 20 feet out it's minus 3.5, so you kind of split the difference in
between there. Approximately 18 feet.
Now, minus three, by the way, minus three, if you ask the
department of environmental protection, minus three is the minimum
water depth that they would consider adequate water depth. And so
very seldom --
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: It is adequate. I've been using
it too.
MR. NELSON: Yeah, it's very minimal adequate water depth,
but -- and it depends on the draft of your boat. Generally, and I think
that in the environmental community, generally minus four, like I said,
a minus four to minus five is the usual, and it is the best thing for the
environment.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, are there any other questions?
Mr. Schiffer?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: One thing right now. They
couldn't put a lift on the existing dock right now, because that would
add dimension to it and would violate the 20 feet, correct?
MR. NELSON: We would still be here. Yeah, we would still be
here to get a variance for that.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So it's not like we're just -- you
know, the rebuilt dock is quite a bit bigger because of that lift. The lift
lifts the boat into a view that it may not normally be in. And because
of the potential ofthe covers that we recently approved, it could be a
permanent structure sitting out there.
I'm done. Thank you, Mark.
Page 121
1
~
, ,
December 6, 2007
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else have any questions of
anyone at this point?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, Mr. Nelson.
Ray, we're done with public speakers?
MR. BELLOWS: Yes.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We'll close the public hearing and
entertain a motion.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'll make a motion.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead, Mr. Schiffer.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Move to deny.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Second.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion's been made to deny, motion's
been seconded. Is there discussion?
The only consideration I would have thought is the gentleman
suggested that if they could move this dock further away from his
house, it might help the situation. And I think they could move it
further away, based on the plan that's presented. I saw that as a
positive. So that was my comment.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Mark, can I respond to that?
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sure.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: He can only move it over five
more feet. And even looking at it, I was trying to sketch it, he could
really only pull it in five more feet. So moving it over five feet and
bringing it down to 32 still doesn't help, I think, the issue with the
neighbor.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: That's right.
MR. NELSON: But I would ask what the option for the client is.
Does he not have the ability to have a boat lift? Is that what the
commission is telling us?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Based upon the 20 feet,
probably not. I mean, nobody else does past the 20 feet.
Page 122
T!~, f A 4
Decemoer 6, 2007
MR. NELSON: Yeah, there's a whole county full of people that
do, actually.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But I mean on the wall of this
thing.
I think there was another thing that Donna said true, too, is that
this isn't an area where they really want to go out of the way to keep
getting bigger and bigger boats into it. So that's another factor.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other comments on the motion?
There's been a motion made to deny. It's been seconded, there's been
discussion.
All those in favor of the motion, signifY by saying aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All those opposed?
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye.
Motion carries 5-2.
Okay, with that, we will end. Thank you all for attending today.
Item #9
OLD BUSINESS
Next order of business is old business. Do we have any old
business?
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I just want to kind of bring one
thing up is -- and Ray, we've got to be wasting a lot of money on
delivery of things. I'm getting letters, I'm getting fellows to the door
with one piece of paper.
Page 123
161 A 4
December 6, 2007
Could we do this, could you organize how you update data and
poll the members to see which they prefer? And here's what happens: I
print out an agenda that comes in e-mail, then two days later there's a
guy handing me one at the door. So we didn't achieve anything other
than the waste, that guy's expense.
So isn't there some way you could poll the board and see what's
the preferable method of update for different members?
And also, I think when you revise the agenda, I think revising it
like you did here, revision two, is a good idea. But I think if you could
just put the date that you revised it, that would be better than
numbering them one, two, three.
So I just really feel bad getting a letter, getting a guy and getting
an e-mail at the same time.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer, rather than have to have
staff make phone calls and correspondence back and forth, why don't
we just ask it? As far as I'm concerned, if we were to establish a
policy, say 10 pages or less it becomes e-mailed, 11 pages or more
you send it out, unless one of us indicates otherwise. Does that work
for everybody here?
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Works for me.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That will save you polling everybody.
MR. BELLOWS: That will help.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay.
MR. BELLOWS: I appreciate it.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Good. Thank you, Mark.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is there any other old business?
Item #10
NEW BUSINESS
Is there any new business?
Page 124
16/ i~
December 6, 201h
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Hearing none, I'll ask for a motion to
adjourn.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: So moved.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Second.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made, seconded by Mr. Midney.
All in favor? Aye.
COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye.
COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We're adjourned. Thank you all.
****
There being no further business for the good of the County, the
meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 12:35 p.m.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
L\j I fAA (1\ \ ?A~t~
MARK P. STRAIN, Chairman
These minutes approved by the Board on ~ ~ I! - o'i?
as presented ;,/ or as corrected
,
TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY
COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC. BY CHERIE'
NOTTINGHAM.
Page 125
16 I A J~nua;i 2008
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Naples, Florida, January 9, 2008
RECEIVED
FEB 0 1 7008
De~);l~Jv~~~~Q:n~;s~~l:~s
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County
Advisory Committee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business
herein, met on this date at 3:30 P,M, in REGULAR SESSION in Conference
Room #610 in the Collier County Community Development and Environmental
Services Center, 2800 N, Horseshoe Drive, Naples,
members present:
CHAIRMAN: William Varian
Charles Abbott
James Boughton
Clay Brooker
David Dunnavant
Marco Espinar
Blair Foley
George Hermanson
Reed Jarvi
Thomas Masters
Robert Mulhere
Dalas Disney (Excused)
David Bryant (Absent)
:sc, Corres:
IG ( ,A-6
ALSO PRESENT:
Joe Sehmitt, CDES Administrator
Marlene Stewart, Staff Liaison
Judy Puig, Operations Analyst, CDES
Phil Gramatges, Public Utilities
Nick Casalanguida, Transportation Services
Susan lstenes, Director, Zoning & Land Development Review
Bob Dunn, Interim Director, Building Review & Permitting Dept.
Mike DeRuntz, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Dept.
,:ate:
:em'
Copies to
,
,J
1 '6 I Ai 5
January 9, 2008
I. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by Chairman William Varian at 3:30 PM,
A quorum was established,
II. Approval of Agenda
Mr. Mulhere moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Masters. Carried
unanimously, 8-0.
III. Approval of Minutes
Mr. Brooker moved to approve the Minutes of December 5,2007 as submitted. Second
by Mr. Espinar. Carried unanimously, 8-0.
IV. Staff Announcements/Updates
C. Public Utilities Update - Phil Gramatges
· Public Utilities Master Plan is in development
· Capital projects will be discussed on Monday
· Anticipated presentation to the Committee and the BCC in May, 2008,
VI. Old Business
C. Presentation of Revised Language - Hydraulic Modeling Fee - Phil Gramatges
· Money is needed in order to perform hydraulic modeling
· Modeling is required to assure capacity at point of connection
· Proposed placing cost for Hydraulic Modeling into Fee Schedule instead of
during SOP or PPL stage
· Fee is $1,000 per model; cost to County is approximately $750 per model
· Threshold: projects with less than 5 ERe's will not need to be modeled
(3:40PM - Reed Jarvi arrived)
Mr. Masters moved to approve the Hydraulic Modeling Fee. Second by Mr. Foley
Discussion ensued, Opposition to the fee was expressed,
Motion was defeated, 8-No, I-Yes, with Mr. Foley infavor.
Mr. Gramatges stated the Hydraulic Modeling Fee was dedicated to the Public Utilities
Department, while the other fees were earmarked for CDES.
Mr. Foley presented problems relative to commercial construction regarding irrigation
and structure usage flow amounts using the new meter form. There is apparently a
second version in use that the Committee did not approve,
Mr. Gramatges stated he would investigate the situation and contact Mr. Foley directly,
(3:48PM - David Dunnavant arrived)
IV. Staff Announcements/Updates:
R Transportation Division Update - Nick Casalanguida
. 1-75/Everglades IJR ("Interchange Justification Report") has been placed on the
agenda Cor review at the next Bee meeting
2
161
~.....,
, ;"'\
January 9;-1008
· The Omnibus Bill appropriated $750,000,00 to commission a year-long study to
evaluate and select a location for the interchange -- Everglades, DeSoto and Big
Cypress will be considered
Chairman Varian asked about potential lane closures during the anticipated Pine Ridge
Road construction,
Mr. Casalanguida stated there would be closures during off-peak and "off' hours,
V. LDC:
A. Amendment Request - 2008 Special Cycle Ia - presented by Douglas Lewis, Esq.
Florida Rock Industries, Inc. (Staff requested Amendment)
There is an exception in the LDC concerning acquisitions and condemnation by
government, or dedication to government. The purpose of the amendment is to add
language that clarifies that the exception also applies when a private party is acting
on behalf of government, and allows severance of TDR (Transfer Development Rights)
Credits, The County will save money since it will only pay for the land and not for
severance damages, The Amendment was approved by EAC after modification to
strike all references to "public purpose,"
Mr. Mulhere moved to approve the Amendment. Second by Mr. Brooker. The
Motion was carried, 9-Yes, I-Abstention (Mr. Hermanson abstained due to conflict
of interest.)
IV. Staff Announcements/Updates:
A. CDES Update - Joe Schmitt, Administrator - CDES
Mr. Schmitt stated the new Fee Schedule was in effect. He asked if there were any
issues the Committee Members wished to discuss,
Chairman Varian stated the fee charged for garage door replacements had been
$53,00 but was now $103,00, He did not remember the Committee approving this
increase, Additionally, there was a significant difference in permit fees for identical
projects in April and December, 2007 - the projects' values and review fees were the
same, no impact fees were involved, yet the permit fee was significantly greater for
the December project.
Mr. Schmitt stated that he would consult with the Building Department to see if fees
had been changed and why,
Speakers:
Brenda Talbert, Executive Vice President, Collier Building Industry
Association, asked about the process for dealing with problems resulting from the
Fee Schedule increases, and how to advise the Association's members as to the best
way to deal with this issue,
Bob Dunn, Acting Building Director, stated he should be contacted and would
handle each situation on a case-by-case basis,
Bob Joslin, Garage Doors of Naples, stated he recently applied for three permits and
had been charged the increased fee, He also asked if the Express Permit Books would
be re-instituted to reduce both paper work, and the time involved,
Joe Schmitt stated if there was a scrivener's error in the Fee Schedule, he would
bring it to the Board's attention so the Ordinance could be amended,
3
161 A 5
January 9, 2008
Also discussed was the application of a proportionate scale to proposed renovations
of older properties, Joe Schmitt stated the Building Code allows for proportionality
when related to improvements and accessibility, The Land Development Code
mandates a renovated structure must be brought up to current Code standards, The
Committee pointed out there are situations where it is not structurally possible or
economically feasible to conform completely to the Code,
Joe Schmitt stated it would be necessary to amend the LDC and asked if a "Task
Force" could be set up to assist him and the LDC Subcommittee in preparing an
Amendment
(4,' fOPM - Charles Abbott arrived)
There was further discussion, The Committee suggested that building improvement
costs could be separated from site improvement costs, the threshold requiring full
compliance to Code might not be triggered, The architectural standards are the
problem.
Mr. Hermanson moved to recommend that the Development Services Director ask
the BCC for direction for Staff to draft an LDC Amendment to allow for more
flexible provisions for building and site improvements. Second by Mr. Jarvi.
Mr. Mulhere suggested adding "for more flexibility and greater definition to the
standard provisions." Mr. Hermanson amended his Motion to include the
suggested language. Carried unanimously, I J - O.
Bob Dunn stated he had spoken with Staff who recommended changing the Fee
Schedule to allow for a minimum permit fee, Convenience permits would be
instituted until the BCC could approve amending the Fee Schedule,
D. Fire Review Update
(Note: Neither Mr. Riley nor a representative from his department was present, but
reports entitled "Summary of Plan Review Activity," and "Fire Plan Review" were
included in the packet of information provided by Staff.)
Bob Dunn stated a Fire Review Task Force Workshop was scheduled for March 18th
from 9:00AM to 12:00 Noon,
VI. Old Business:
A. Floodplain Management Plan 2008 Update
Mike DeRuntz, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Department, stated
the BCC approved the Floodplain Management Plan in December. The Floodplain
Management Planning Committee will review items that could affect either the
Growth Management Plan or the Land Development Code, Proposed Amendments
would be brought to DSAC for review before tinal presentation to the BCe.
Committee members questioned the composition of the Floodplain Management
Planning Committee, There were members from government as well as the general
public,
4
I6iA 5
January 9, 2008
Mr. Jarvi moved to recommend to the BCC and the County Manager that two
professional civil engineers (non-governmental) be included as members of the
Floodplain Management Planning Committee. Second by Mr. Mulhere. Carried
unanimously, 11-0.
VII. New Business:
B. DSAC Applications - Review/Endorsement
Chairman Varian stated there were two vacancies on the Developmental Services
Advisory Committee and two applications had been received for these vacancies,
The terms for Brian Jones and Fred Reischl had expired,
Mr. Masters moved to accept the applications of Laura Spurgeon DeJohn and
Patrick G. White to fill the current DSAC vacancies and to recommend approval to
the BCe. Second by Mr. Foley. Carried unanimously, 11-0.
C. Selection of 2008 DSAC Chairman
Mr. Masters moved to nominate William Varian as Chairman. Second by Mr.
Mulhere. Motion carried 10-Yes, I-Abstention. (Chairman Varian abstained.)
Mr. Foley moved to nominate Thomas Masters as Vice Chair. Second by Mr.
Mulhere. Motion carried IO-Yes, I-Abstention (Mr. Masters abstained.)
(4:30 - Bob Mulhere lefi)
VI. Old Business:
C, Policies and Procedures for Change-out Sheet - Susan Istenes, Zoning Director
Ms. Istenes presented the Staff policy for implementation of the fee for Sheet Trade-
Outs, Copies of the policy were distributed to the Committee. Members commented
that this particular policy actually saved money for contractors.
VIIl. Member Comments:
Clay Brooker stated an issue regarding outdoor seating was presented during the last
LDC cycle, County Attorney Jeff Klatzkow had presented an update to the Committee
in November and stated revisions to the LDC noise ordinance were to be brought back
before the Committee for review in December. Clay recently read that the Planning
Commission was scheduled to vote on proposed changes regarding outdoor seating,
Hc was contacted by a Planning Commissioner asking for DSAC's comments and he
informed that individual DSAC had yet not seen the proposcd changes,
Mr. Espinar moved to request that the Planning Commission forward the changes for
outdoor seating for review by DSA C prior to presentation to the BCC for approval.
Second by Mr. Hermanson.
Chairman Varian stated the changes should have been presented via the usual route - to
DSAC, then to EAC and finally to the Planning Commission,
Chairman Varian calledfor a vote. Carried unanimously, 10-0,
IX. Next Meeting Dates:
February 6, 2008; March 5, 2008; April 2, 2008; May 7,2008
5
161 A
f."":'j
,,'
i;.:.;::i!
"
ia~uary 9, 2008
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by
order of the Chair at 4:45 PM.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
LA') /^"- "/
Wilha~arian, Chairman
These Minutes were approved by the Board/Committee on W(l./.a'1 &, clbO'if
as presented X, ' or as amended ,
6
16 I A~ 6
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ADVISORY COUNCIL
(EMSAC) ,~ ,." , ,
'"-n
December 19,2007
NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC
Second Floor Education Center Located: 120 Goodlette Road North
District I Commission District - Victoria DiNardo, Present .' ,I,... 'If
District 2 Commiss~on District -- Jeffrey Allbritten, Chairman, Present Fiala .,y'y,_ _
Dlstnct 3 CommissIOn Dlstnct - John ValentJ, Absent Halas ..~_ .--
District 4 Commission District - Nancy Lascheid, Vice Chairman, Prese~enning- " ',&, '-, -=
Dlstnct 5 Commission Dlstnct - Vacant . ,oyle . 62~
At Large -- Johan Domenie, Absent Coletta,. -..' .' ..---
At Large - Dr. Douglas Lee, Absent
Naples Community Hospital- Gail Dolan, Present
City of Naples Police and Emergency Services - Jim McEvoy, Chief, Present
Collier County Health Department - Kathleen Marr, Present
City of Marco Island Fire/Rescue -- Michael Murphy, Chief, Present
Collier County Fire Chiefs Associations - Rob Pottieger, Assistant Chief, Absent
Physician's Regional Medical Center -- Dr. Jeffrey Panozzo, Present
Collier County Sheriffs Office - Commander Bill Rule, Absent
Minutes from this month were sent to a transcriber. Please see the 104 page transcribed
minutes.
After the recording stopped, the only thing discussed was the schedule for 2008, Considering there
was no longer a quorum, it was decided to wait until the January meeting to adopt the schedule,
The next meeting will be held on January 30, 2008,
Respectfully Submitted,
Jennifer Florin
AQopted (including transcribed minutes) on:
/ :> -~- ~- C-
/' ':.... '>c/--C:;,'f' ..
/:> " " ~/~., /y/ .
/ ///1-' /, / m~~ .
/ - /." - / ./.. /// - /
//::',/;< (/." .'-/, .
Chairman or Member Representative
Mise, COtTeS:
Iv I Pi ~
Date:
Item I:
Copies to:
J
1
2
TRANSCRIPT OF THE MINUTES OF THE
3
COLLIER COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
4
ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING
5
6
DATE:
December 19, 2007
7
LOCATION:
Neighborhood Health Clinic
120 Goodlette Road North
Naples, FL
8
9
10
APPEARANCES:
11
Chief Jeff Page
12
Jeff Allbritten, Chairman
13
Nancy Laschied, Vice Chairman
14
Chief Michael Murphy
15
Chief Jim McEvoy
16
Gail Dolan
17
Kathleen Marr
18
Dr. Jeff Panozzo
19
Victoria DiNardo
20
Dr. Robert Tober
21
Jennifer Florin
22 TRANSCRIBED BY: JOYCE B. HOWELL, NOTARY PUBLIC
GREGORY COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC,
23 2650 Airport Road South
Naples, FL 34112
24 239,774,4414
25
18~1
A'~6
1
1 (The pledge of allegiance was recited in
2 unison.)
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NANCY LASCHEID: All right, The
chair will entertain motion to adopt the agenda,
if you'll take a look at that, please.
Oh, we can1t pass (inaudible). They donrt
have a quorum. We can1t even pass the minutes.
October -- okay,
Well, then, the chair is going to make the
decision, since the consultant to the master plan
is the old business you're going to review next
is that what yourre going to talk about next?
CHIEF PAGE: Well, I will if you
want me to do that.
NANCY LASCHEID: I'd like to wait
until we have a quorum.
CHIEF PAGE: Sure,
NANCY LASCHEID: And thank you,
(Inaudible) voices.
CHIEF PAGE: They should be here
in just a (inaudible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Sounds like it.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Coming up the
stairs.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay,
16,
2
/
A
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE:
ready (inaudible),
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Some of us can't
(Inaudible) we're
read.
NANCY LASCHEID: I defer to the
chair.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Please, (inaudible)
chair.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yes,
JEFF ALLBRITTEN:
(Inaudible) don't
have the ability to read e-mails, so I shouldn't
be able to run the meeting either.
NANCY LASCHEID: Okay, We're
going to (inaudible) you one more time.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Okay, Adoption of
the agenda. I understand we have a quorum now
that certain lagging members are here.
So do I hear a motion to adopt __
MIKE MURPHY: Motion to approve,
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Okay,
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I'll second,
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Okay, Any
discussion? All in favor?
(Chorus of ayes,)
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: All opposed?
16/
3
,n
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(No response.)
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: All right, I think
you1ve had a chance to review the minutes from
last month's meeting?
Do I hear a motion to adopt the minutes?
JIM MCEVOY: So moved,
NANCY LASCHEID: Second,
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Any discussion?
Any errors or omissions?
Okay. Hearing none, all in favor of
approving the minutes, say aye.
(Chorus of ayes,)
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: All opposed?
(No response.)
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Okay, Chief?
CHIEF PAGE: Sure, The master
plan -- you should have in our packets two
different letters, one from Commissioner or
Chairman Colleta, and the other from, I believe,
the chair of the productivity committee, John
Barlow (phonetic).
Obviously, both those letters indicate that
EMSAC is going to have their own ability to work
with them on that master plan.
Now, everybody should have a copy, correct,
16 f !J~ ~o
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
every board member?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE:
Correct.
CHIEF PAGE:
So I don't know if
any of you have any questions about anything in
the plan that I can answer today, but I wanted to
find out from the chair how you would like to
proceed, you know, from this point forward on
that,
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: You're looking to
me to make that determination?
CHIEF PAGE: Well, or your
board, but
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Right,
CHIEF PAGE: if there's
anything that we can do to kind of -- if there1s
any research you1re wanting or -- 11m sure Mike
has something.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Absolutely,
MIKE MURPHY:
Chief, just a
couple of quick questions.
Have there ever been any revisions to this
whatsoever in reference to they left out, like,
the area toward the Isles and some of those that
we have discussed previously? Have they revised
this in any way, shape or form?
5
1 (51 Af~
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
CHIEF PAGE: Not to my
knowledge, no.
MIKE MURPHY: Okay.
CHIEF PAGE:
I mean, their work
is done when that came out.
MIKE MURPHY; Okay,
CHIEF PAGE: There was one page,
I believe it was like page 37, that was revised on
the financial side of it because we had to provide
them some additional information.
It had to do
with revenue fees and things of that nature that
they were confused about.
But I believe the copies that you have is the
revised page.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay.
MIKE MURPHY; And then in
reference to the actions by this board, they have
made some recommendations for additional positions
and items like that. Does this board need to
address those things prior to your budget, and if
so, when would you like to discuss that in front
of this group?
CHIEF PAGE; Well, I believe
that the productivity committee will start looking
at this in January. So, you know, next month,
16/
6
fj
t-t
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
they're going to be contacting you to set this
joint committee up.
Now, I don't know if that's going to be the
two of you working independently or you're going
to meet together.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE:
CHIEF PAGE: But that's
{Inaudible} ,
something, you know, you, as a group, might want
to consider.
So thatls going to be an additional
meeting for you or do you want a subcommittee?
MIKE MURPHY: Okay. Then I have
a suggestion to the chair that we create a
subcommittee from this group to meet with a
subcommittee of the productivity committee, and
then perhaps sit -- when is your budget, in March,
April? When do you
CHIEF PAGE: We'll have to start
presenting it before that.
MIKE MURPHY: Okay,
So then let
us say, because of the time limits, work towards
that committee meeting and bringing back to a
joint group, maybe at the end of February, is that
timely enough for you?
CHIEF PAGE: Oh, certainly,
MIKE MURPHY: Okay. Then that
7
.;~
A
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
would be my motion, that we create a subcommittee
of this group, have a subommittee -- ask them to
create a subcommittee, and then jointly meet
sometime the end of February, the intent purpose
of discussions of this report and the economic as
well as any other issues that might come up.
CHIEF PAGE, Okay, Just -- we
just need to, whenever that subcommittee meets, we
need to let Jennifer know, because we have to
publicly notice it.
MIKE MURPHY, Absolutely,
CHIEF PAGE, Okay,
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: We have a motion to
create a subcommittee.
(Inaudible) second, first
of all, the motion, we can discuss.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Uh-huh,
NANCY LASCHEID, No, I don't have
a second, but I have a comment.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Okay, Let's first
get a second to his motion. Anybody?
CHIEF PAGE: Mr. Chair?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Uh-huh,
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, I don't believe
that we need a motion and a second to form a
subcommittee. We can do that at your will as
Li!
',1'11"6
fJ
, I
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
chairman of the council.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: You know, absolute
power corrupts absolutely, Okay, I'm happy, but
I want to be democratic about this. That's fine.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay,
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Okay, Question?
Nancy.
NANCY LASCHEID: Comment. My
comment would be concern about how you're going to
divide who's going to be on the subcommittee.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Well, I'd look for
volunteers, first of all. I think the folks who
are the most knowledgeable in the area would be
the most logical folks to serve on this, that can
work directly with us and the other committee.
NANCY LASCHEID: But there should
be some diversity
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Uh-huh,
JEFF PANOZZO: Oh, absolutely,
NANCY LASCHEID: -- within the
committee.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: I stand looking for
volunteers at this moment.
NANCY LASCEID: I volunteer,
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Nancy,
9
161
i>'
it~'*
..,' ~
',,-.#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
10
MIKE MURPHY: I'll volunteer,
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Okay, We have
three. How many more would like to serve on this?
Does the committee feel comfortable with a
committee -- a subcommittee as small as three?
MIKE MURPHY: I would like a
representative, an ad hoc representative from EMS,
though, if you don't mind.
CHIEF PAGE: I don't think we
can do that. I mean, I -- we can serve as a
liaison, but we can't be part of your
subcommittee.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE:
(Inaudible) .
VICTORIA DINARDO: I can volunteer,
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: More volunteers,
okay,
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE:
(Inaudible) ,
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Okay, So we will
have a subcommittee that (inaudible).
NANCY LASCHEID: And how will we
choreograph the scheduling of the subcommittee?
Will that come through your office?
CHIEF PAGE: Yeah, We'll do it
for you.
NANCY LASCHIED: Okay, Thank you,
1 6 f"q 5;;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
11
CHIEF PAGE: And we'll provide
the meeting rooms or whatever you need.
NANCY LASCHEID: Well, we can meet
here, if thatrs conducive
CHIEF PAGE: Sure.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Uh-huh,
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Okay,
CHIEF PAGE: I just need
Jennifer to attend so she can do the minutes and
stuff ,
JEFF PANOZZO: In January or when
are we targeting meeting?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It (inaudible)
early,
MIKE MURPHY: January and then
work towards a goal, I would think, of a joint
committee meeting as they did with the planning
and the productivity committee for one session
sometime at the end of February so that any impact
or economic impact is going to be forwarded into
as recommendations to the individuals who are
going to prepare the budget and eventually Mr.
Summers (phonetic) and everybody else.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay,
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Comfortable with
l' t{
~
i
Y""
I
'")
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
that?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Uh-huh.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Very good. Thank
you, members, who volunteered for that.
Moving forward.
(Inaudible) discuss
consultants.
CHIEF PAGE, Yeah, I think that
covers all I had, unless you had a specific
question about it.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, No, I don't.
Anybody else questions, or are we just going
to save this for the subcommittee? Okay.
New business, then. Medical protocols?
CHIEF PAGE, Chief Murphy had
asked that we bring in the medical director to
discuss the medical protocol, and Dr. Tober is
here today, so I'm going to turn it over to Bob.
DR. TOBER, Thanks, Jeff. Good afternoon,
everybody.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Good afternoon.
DR. TOBER: lId like to go over some of the
thoughts and evolutions that have occurred over
the many years that I have been the medical
director of EMS here in Collier County.
As many of you, some of you may not know,
16/ A 6
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
lIve been here since 1978. We, at that time, had
Cadillac ambulances running as fast as they could
to get to a hospital staff by EMTs, and I think --
were you driving back then?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE,
Probably.
DR. TOBER: That was why the roads were so
dangerous.
And so from June to February 2nd of 179, we
pulled together a -- an ALS system and launched
six vehicles, you know, on February 2nd of 1979,
and at that time, I trained 18 paramedics, men and
women, two of whom were Jeff Page and Tom Maguire,
still with us today. And over this now almost 30
years, we have evolved to 26 ALS units, the
emergence of some ALS engine staff by both Collier
County EMS and the fire department.
And have, thanks be to God, been given
multiple accolades for doing a spectacular job in
saving people's lives in this county.
Today, we have an organized patchwork quilt
of police and fire agencies making up a BLS safety
net of primary intervention and help along with
some areas having the additional backup of ALS
engines, although this is inconsistent from one
place to another.
16/
p?
"
tfr=
~V
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
14
Right now, Immokalee, Corkscrew, Golden Gate
and Ochopee still only respond on a BLS level.
Additionally East Naples Fire, while considered an
ALS department, is not covering its entire
district, as far as I understand, with ALS service
yet.
Over the years, lIve experienced, and like I
say, I have been listening to a lot of people for
a long time here, an increased effort on the part
of the fire departments to play an increasingly
major role in the delivery of pre-hospital medical
care. The motives for such efforts are varied
from firefighter to firefighter and fire chief to
fire chief, but there is little question that over
80 percent of fire response today is to medical
calls.
That response may involve the very, very
important role of fire suppression, extrication,
rescue, water, whatever.
So I don1t belittle
that. The bottom line is that 80 percent of their
response in our county is medical in nature.
I have also increasingly heard the statement
that a paramedic is a paramedic is a paramedic.
That is, all such paramedics, from both the fire
departments and EMS are state certified and
-----.~"-"
"1'J t... ! A 1 'fJ
I'
.. '\...: ~
1
licensed.
So why is there any difference in their
2
protocols or clinical liberties? Why are they
3
medically credentialed at different levels within
4
our one protocol, and why do the fire departments
5
continue to hire and develop additional paramedics
6
in their own systems?
7
Collier County has but one single medical
8
protocol. EMTs are able to work within the BLS
9
system. ALS engine medics work up to the level of
10
the ALS engine system. And rescue paramedics
11
working for Collier County EMS work the entire
12
protocol.
13
I reiterate, however, that there is only one
14
protocol.
People working the streets, inclusive
15
of even the police, in cardiac arrest situations,
16
carry the protocol to whatever level they are
17
competent and practiced to deliver.
18
The rationale and answers to the above
19
questions are specific and with considerable
20
precedent. First and foremost is that a kitchen
21
can only handle so many chefs before each and
22
every chef no longer gets enough hands-on
23
experience to maintain their skills.
24
Hospitals have, for many, many years,
25
attempted to limit the number of critical
16/
(I'
f~,
~.)
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
subspecialists, such as surgeons, so that each and
every surgeon remains competent in their own
skills.
Medical credentialing still watches over the
frequency of procedures and skills so that
physicians remain competent and practiced to do
these skills.
In the last quarter, and I'm going to put on
a few overheads here for you.
I may have to turn
down some of the lights. Just keep moving
everything until it -- is that reasonably visible
to you?
In the last quarter, Collier County EMS wrote
7,484 tickets and did 41,456 procedures ranging
from applying oxygen to complex medication
administration.
In comparison, East Naples, which
is up there, did 608 procedures, of which only six
ALS procedures were done prior to EMS arrival, and
484 procedures were done in the presence of the
lead paramedic decision maker from Collier County
EMS.
I'll be happy to put these back up again, but
I just want to give you some idea of what this
looks like.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE,
(Inaudible) the
16
16
,
j
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
focus, Doctor, if you could, please.
DR. TOBER,
Is that better? I can get both
ways here to see
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, That's better.
DR. TOBER, All right.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Thank you.
DR. TOBER: Marco Island Fire Department,
during the last quarter, wrote zero tickets and
did 197 procedures in the presence of the lead
paramedic decision maker from Collier County EMS.
Naples Fire Department wrote zero tickets and did
102 procedures in the presence of the lead
paramedic decision maker from Collier County EMS.
I've got to keep walking back and forth here
just to give you an idea of what is here. How is
that focused? All right?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Uh-huh.
DR. TOBER: North Naples Fire wrote 286
tickets. They did 517 procedures, of which 13 ALS
procedures were done prior to EMS arrival and 504
were done in the presence of the lead paramedic
decision maker from Collier County EMS.
The medical literature is full of accounts of
virtually a one-to-one correlation between the
number of patient/paramedic encounters and that
16/
17
A
;
~
l,J
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
18
paramedic1s respective abilities in terms of
decision making, IV and airway proficiency.
Great paramedics in our own system, like Jeff
Page, who, at one time, was a very skilled
clinical supervisor, with years of experience,
would admit to you today that he is a dangerous
paramedic because he is not actively engaged in
the type of patient care and complex decision
making that makes up paramedic medicine.
Jeff Panozzo (phonetic), who is one of the
members here, I probably have more than twice, or
three times the years of experience in emergency
department that Jeff has, but I would not go on
duty at Physicians Regional, Collier -- Pine
Ridge, without spending one or two months with
Jeff to make sure that my current level of
experience was high enough and current enough that
I felt competent to staff the emergency department
by myself, which I did for almost 30 years here in
Naples.
Recently, I spoke to an outstanding paramedic
training at Collier County EMS, and now working
for East Naples Fire, and that paramedic admitted
to me that their clinical exposure at East Naples
Fire is trivial in nature and insufficient to
# , A
~" ;;,
(~\ E
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
maintain their skills necessary to provide lead
paramedic decision making.
Why would I, at the insistence of my own
paramedics that we loan to the ALS engine program,
go to the trouble of rotating these same highly
trained medics back to ambulance service every
other month if paramedicine were not a technical
and intellectual skill that requires constant
practice to perfect and maintain?
In Collier County, we have about 36,000 calls
per year, of which about 7,000 of them are
challenging and serious emergencies. Divide that
number of 7,000 by approximately 128 Collier
County EMS paramedics, of which only 115 are
certified to the rescue level, and you have about
54 calls per year per paramedic, or four to five
calls per month that are challenging, and ask that
paramedic to reach deeply into their archives of
skills, training and judgment.
I am not the first medical director who has
figured out that less is more when it comes to the
number of critical paramedic decision makers in a
system.
If I diluted this system another 80 to
100 paramedics, I would face serious skills and
decision making degradation.
16/
19
fJ.
. ,
6
"If
.1
20
1
Additionally, a Collier County EMS paramedic
2
not only arrive at our system with a license and
3
state certification, they go through a five-week
4
paramedic academy, followed by an internship with
5
a field training officer that can range from two
6
months to as long as a year if that field training
7
officer thinks that it is needed.
8
And depending upon the level of skill and
9
experience that that medic arrives, at some point
10
in time, he's either ready to sit in front of me
11
for a final look-see or we either keep him back in
12
training or put him back as an EMT because he
13
canlt qualify at a higher level.
14
Nationwide, there are many fire departments
15
whose stated goal is to have all of their
16
personnel certified as paramedics. This can and
17
does lead to an overkill situation at some times
18
with multiple engines, apparatus and manpower
19
arriving on the scene of an emergency that might
20
only require a few medics and one of them better
21
be sharp and skilled enough to make the right
22
decisions and provide the right care.
23
I do not know the extent to which organized
24
labor pushes for higher skill~based pay for their
25
members, nor the push to demonstrate equivalency
A
6
1
of care with the local ambulance service, i.e.,
2
Collier County EMS, to justify the very existence
3
of multiple tiers of paramedics within a system of
4
emergency response or the eventual plan to take
5
over transport of patients in their own district
6
and fracture the uniform system that we have
7
today.
8
I do know that there is a critical dilution
9
factor reference patient/paramedic experience and
10
our own study of the numbers demonstrates a vast
11
difference, an absolutely vast difference in the
12
patient/paramedic experience between a fire agency
13
and an ambulance-based paramedic.
14
Having the number of medics that we have in
15
the fire department is not all bad. They do, on
16
occasion, fill voids in our system in response to
17
a 911 call, especially if the call gets
18
misdirected or an inordinate number of calls come
19
out at the same moment.
20
I have given the fire departments enough fire
21
power, excuse the pun, to help stabilize a patient
22
prior to the arrival of Collier County EMS, but as
23
you can see from the following numbers, the fire
24
departments never approach the outside boundaries
25
of their clinical liberties with a patient, and in
7
t,. .'"
~ 'l..'
21
A
l
()
...'~.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
general, infrequently provide anything beyond
oxygen and cardiac monitors on an ALS system
basis.
Enclosed are detailed sheets from the last
quarter as well.
11m hitting you with a lot so
you understand how and why we are doing what werre
doing.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE,
Put it down so
that
DR. TOBER,
It's hard to get it allan here,
but I will -- I want to get -- that's better all
the way. There, if you can see from top to
bottom.
The upper portion of that chart is the
medicine that is carried by both ALS engines and
paramedics in the Collier County EMS. The lower
portion is the additional 11 medicines carried by
Collier County EMS. And as you can see here,
these 11 medicines, which is what some of the fire
departments are screaming that I give them, this
is the administration time by a paramedic and EMS
and how deep into a call those administrations
occurred prior to the rescue paramedic actually
administering that medicine.
Again, nowhere near reaching the outside
161
22
A
6
1
limits of the protocols that are involved in this
2
list of medicines, which, in and of itself, is
3
extraordinarily liberal and probably more liberal
4
than most ALS/EMS systems in the United States.
5
So I wanted to make sure everybody
6
understood, on EMSAC, what this was about.
7
Collier County EMS and Bob Tober is unaware
8
of one single circumstance where the fire
9
departments, with far less experience using these
10
drugs, would ever have the opportunity to go that
11
deep into a protocol and reach into that basket of
12
11 additional drugs.
13
In the Emergency Medical Services master
14
plan, I quote the following, page 30. This
15
fragmentation of the certification licensure
16
system has created tension among the various
17
agencies and serves little purpose in the overall
18
medical direction of the system. With a more
19
consistent training and orientation program of all
20
ALS personnel, regardless of agency, the system
21
can begin to function more uniformly in regards to
22
pre-hospital medical care for the citizens of
23
Collier County.
24
Recommendation.
Increase training, education
25
and practice consistency among all ALS providers,
/" ~j'i A 6
t
1"'-.,'-' ,
,. ~ ,
23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
and ensure that all providers are able to perform
equal skills and procedures prior to certifying
them to function within the system, end of quote.
The authors of this master plan spent five
minutes with me on the phone and many afternoons
with respect to fire departments.
Not only does Collier County EMS have nowhere
near the resources to provide field training
internships for another 80 to 100 medics, why
would we bless the expenditure of these resources
to highly train a group of people that could never
maintain their skills?
I reiterate to you that our own highly
trained and experienced paramedics already loaned
to the ALS engine service, with possession of
these skills, are mandated to rotate every other
month full time back to a transport ambulance on a
rescue unit.
Moreover, the figures enclosed do not lie.
They clearly show what I have always maintained.
The fire departments primarily provide a critical
lifesaving BLS safety net to our citizens with
occasional initiation of some ALS procedures.
I have given them more liberties than most
emergency medical systems possess.
I would
16/A 6
24
25
1
consider any further advance of their protocol an
2
act of reckless disregard for patient safety,
3
given the absolute correlation of
4
patient/paramedic contact ratios and the outcomes
5
of those procedures and decision making from such
6
contacts.
7
Should the multiple fire agencies and EMS
8
consolidate someday within Collier County, I would
9
envision the following. Redistribution of
10
manpower to create a more homogenous presence of
11
firefighters and first response apparatus
12
throughout the entire county, continue to add ALS
13
transport units as growth demanded, but instead of
14
going outside to find paramedics, recruit the best
15
fire medics interested in patient care within the
16
agency, provide them field internships for however
17
long it took to bring them up to speed and then
18
emerse them in patient contacts the way rescue
19
medics are now emersed.
20
Continue to refine and maintain a system of
21
first ALS engine and BLS response so that any of
22
us in any corner of this county will receive
23
prompt and competent care.
24
Finally, I have asked Greg Pacter (phonetic)
25
to address all of you for a brief moment. Greg
---...
1 L r.
,-,0 i
.4i'6
1
worked for some years as a paramedic with Marco
2
Island Fire Department. He was an enthusiastic
3
paramedic. He studied hard and was very anxious
4
to provide any and all care that he could either
5
before EMS arrived or concurrent with the presence
6
of EMS.
7
As a matter of fact, he often approached me
8
and asked me for more equipment and the liberty to
9
do more before EMS arrival. To an extent, he was
10
a thorn in my side, always nudging the system to
11
give him more and more clinical liberties.
12
Greg moved on to another job outside of Marco
13
Island Fire Department in Naples, and then
14
returned back to Naples and applied for a job as a
15
paramedic working for Collier County EMS. He
16
recently completed his training, as a matter of
17
fact, certified as a rescue medic with me two days
18
ago. And I wanted to invite you up for a moment,
19
Greg, uncoerced by me and unsolicited by me, to
20
give you his take on both sides of the fence.
21
MR. PACTOR: Thank you, committee, for
22
allowing me to speak to you for a minute.
23
Just a little background of myself.
I've
24
been an EMT since 1987.
In '89, I went to
25
paramedic school.
I worked for Chief Murphy for a
16/
26
..
I~
,
f.,.
U
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
number of years.
I worked for Marco for 14 years,
and five years I was a captain on B shift.
I have an interesting perspective on this,
working both sides of the fence. Just to
understand the firefighter with the fire
department, as also a paramedic, and then a
paramedic who works for the county, also, some are
firefighters, when you have a firefighter, you
come out of the academy a green stick firefighter.
They get into a fire department. They go
through training, a lot of training. They learn
tactics and protocols and skills. And they move
up. And they advance through a chain and through
a ladder.
We want them to do that. We want them to
learn more about the fire department and its
operation so they can be a great firefighter, so
they can go in and do the job working in a team,
working with the engineers and working with their
officers to save lives and fight fires and do the
job there.
AS they progress in their career, they become
engineers. They learn pump operations. They
learn hydraulics, intricate operations of
expensive and complicated equipment that we use to
'f'
.1' f.l!,
-A.. '~... '
27
,....,
.~
~
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
save lives in fires and rescue procedures.
And then they move up to become officers.
They1re learning tactics and protocols and skills.
And we want them to do this. We want these
firefighters to dedicate themselves and train
themselves to be the best firefighters that they
can be, that the best firefighters are out there.
And I've had the fortunate opportunity, with
many of the people in this room, to work alongside
them. There are exceptional firefighters. There
are great firefighters in this county that are,
also some of them are paramedics. And they do a
great job.
Just as in this county, there are the
paramedics with Collier County. They start as
EMTs. They learn the EMT skills and they study
the protocols and the tactics. And then they go
to paramedic school and they become paramedics.
And they dedicate themselves to becoming the best
paramedics possible, by the dedication of learning
these skills, learning the additional procedures
to become these rescue paramedics.
They have this continuous learning and
education to keep high in their skills, so when it
comes times to save lives, when it comes time for
161 A 6
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
29
those special medications and procedures, they're
ready to do that.
We need dedicated firefighters. We need
dedicated fire officers that are trained in their
skills and keep up on the skills and tactics that
can also function as paramedics to a level. They
don't have to go through the same level of
training. They don't have to have the constant,
continuous training to be up to the rescue
paramedic level.
They can have the engine medic level, and I
worked at that level for many years. We had some
drugs. We had enough that in the first ten
minutes or so, or 15 minutes on scene, we can
stabilize the patient. We can maintain that
patient and keep them alive until the transport
capabilities get there to take the care to the
next level, to get them to the hospital.
And with that dedication on both sides, with
those paramedics training and learning and keeping
up on their protocols and their skills, they are
the exceptional paramedics. They are highly
trained paramedics who are there to save the
lives.
And they are two separate functions. We need
16JR
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
paramedics who are at that level, who can keep up
on the drugs and the protocols and the skills and
they can keep -- to take the patient to the
hospital, to maintain and save lives, as we need
firefighters that are at that high level, that can
take a group of men and women into a fire and put
out the fire and save lives and do the rescue
operations.
So there is two separate specialities, and we
need to make sure we have people training
constantly to maintain that level.
That1s my perspective on the operation.
think --
DR. TOBER, Thanks.
MR. PACTOR, Are there any questions that I
I
can answer?
JIM MCEVOY, Are you saying that
you donrt see a benefit to a firefighter/paramedic
riding on ALS engines, having those skills,
knowing those skills, and being able to practice
those skills?
MR. PRACTOR, Actually, it's quite the
contrary.
I really do believe that having
additional paramedics there is very important.
There are times that the engine gets on scene
161A 'a
11 6 I t\ ., ~
~ Ii "",,,,
31
1
first and those paramedics, just as I was a medic
2
on an engine for many years, initiated care,
3
starting the care. But the long-term care isn't
4
there.
5
Very rarely would we ever be on scene
6
anything more than five minutes before an
7
ambulance was on scene with additional paramedics
8
with all the additional equipment.
9
So if we have the drugs that we can maintain
10
a life or save a life within the first ten minutes
11
of that critical care, which we do now, any ALS
12
engine 10 the county that's trained to that ALS
13
engine medic level has those drugs, has those
14
protocols, has those skills that they can do the
15
initial advanced life support care, maintaining
16
the life, saving life, whatever needs to be done
17
in the first, 10, 15 minutes, because we have the
18
protocols that we march on down.
19
We start with the BLS, the basic life
20
support. And then if the patient requires it, we
21
get into the ALS. And there's steps that we go
22
along the way. To get through all those
23
procedures and get through all those protocol
24
steps, it takes quite a bit of time. And that
25
whole time, the ambulance is responding there.
32
1
If the ambulance is in your district when
2
that call drops, they1re there right at the same
3
time as the engine. So very rarely do we start
4
the care as an engine medic and waiting and
5
waiting for an ambulance. They1re right there
6
together.
7
There are times, because of multiple calls,
8
that an engine may be there first. But there are
9
so many ambulances, there's what, 26 ambulances
10
scattered throughout the county, within five, ten
11
minutes, you'll have an ambulance on scene.
12
So to sit there and take your firefighter,
13
who is dedicated and training and constantly
14
educating themselves in the tactics and strategy
15
protocols and everything else with the fire
16
department, and ask them also to take on the
17
constant learning to keep themselves educated on
18
all the additional drugs and all the additional
19
procedures, we have that.
20
We want that firefighter to be the best
21
firefighter they can be, just as we want that
22
paramedic to be the best paramedic they can be.
23
JIM MCEVOY, Why wouldn't you
24
want that firefighter to be the best paramedic
25
that they can be?
161
'" pi,.,..
r~~ ' C"I
33
1
MR. PACTOR: There are some. There are
2
paramedics absolutely out there that can be
3
excellent, exceptional in both. That's not
4
everybody. But it is two separate jobs.
5
And when we sit there and we write protocols,
6
we write procedures, we don't write just for those
7
exceptional few. And 11m not going to say that
8
they are substandard -- there are paramedics out
9
there that meet the standard.
10
So to sit there and say to that paramedic,
11
not only do you have to be the best firefighter
12
that there is, but you also have to be the best
13
paramedic, it's taking two separate jobs and now
14
trying to educate them in that.
15
I think you
JIM MCEVOY,
16
underestimate firefighters.
17
MR. PACTOR, Not at all, sir.
I've worked
18
alongside many firefighters over the years, and
19
there are some great firefighter paramedics out
20
there, and there are some that meet the standard.
21
DR. TOBER, Greg, thanks.
22
Jim, let me just make one comment, again,
23
because it goes back to the same thing.
24
I've got -- there's two doctors that sit on
25
EMSAC, okay, Dr. Lee and Dr. Panozzo.
lIve got
,....,..
16
A
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
34
twice the experience of both of them sum, okay?
Twice the experience, all right? It doesn't make
me better or worse.
It's just a matter of fact.
I'm much older and I have twice the experience,
okay?
I would not go on duty in either one of their
emergency departments without emersing myself back
for a few months in full-time care before I did
it.
What lIve put up on the board is an
illustration that, for the most part, even the
best paramedic/firefighters are only on scene a
few minutes before Collier County EMS gets there,
and then they fall back to a helper situation.
It's not better or worse.
It's what each person
does in the system for a full-time living. That' 5
what it is.
You can only -- you can only support so many
paramedics with so many patient encounters in a
system that has 36,000 calls a year.
Let me close with the following. This county
needs fire suppression, it needs rescue and
extrication services and it needs the carefully
stitched safety net of BLS/ALS fall-back that we
currently have when EMS is delayed by more than a
16 I A6
1 1.';- /
b , :l"'~~
35 , '"..~J
1
few minutes.
2
This system already exists and functions at
3
an extraordinarily high and efficient level, as
4
evidenced by our survival statistics and literally
5
our world acclaim as one of the best places on
6
earth to have cardiac arrest. And that's because
7
of that carefully stitched BLS/ALS system that we
8
have.
9
Medical necessity, patient safety and
10
clinical credentialing have been at the heart and
11
soul of what I have done.
Politics have never
12
played a role in my past decision making, and I
13
will not allow them to play a role in my future
14
decision making.
15
I am providing you with a detailed series of
16
articles, the first written by Matt Zabatski
17
(phonetic), a frequent national speaker and writer
18
about EMS systems, that underscores my points and
19
my insistence on limiting the dilution factor in
20
our emergency medical system.
21
The points of these articles substantiate the
22
following. There is such a thing as too many
23 paramedics and a serious downside to skilled
24 deterioration and a rusting of clinical decision
25 making in such systems.
._------"~. .'------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
lIve gone through the same thing in the
emergency department.
I'd need to be spruced up
by Jeff before I'd go back on duty full time by
myself.
Mannequins are a far cry from real patient
encounters in terms of keeping paramedics fit and
competent as primary decision makers. Degradation
of abilities has been demonstrated repeatedly in
many other systems when clinical encounters are
diluted.
An article from USA Today, which 11m giving
you, indicates that the fewer the number of
paramedics, the better the outcomes in complex
systems such as ours.
The third article I am handing you questions
whether or not every engine even needs a
paramedic, much less a paramedic that rarely
delivers any substantive care past life saving,
basic life support.
Article four talks about survival and how
such survival depends heavily upon how you deploy
your police, fire and EMS resources.
Infighting
and turf wars are very dangerous to the publicrs
health. Moreover, not all firefighters even want
25 to provide medical care.
16/
36
A
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
37
Lastly, fire chiefs can end up having more to
say about medical care than a system's medical
director.
Article five, which is a joint position paper
regarding the future of paramedic staffing in the
State of Florida, endorsed by a host of
organizations including the Florida Ambulance
Association, the Florida Professional
Firefighters, EMS providers, EMS Florida Medical
Directors, the list goes on. There are nine
agencies.
On page four of this article which 11m giving
you, the subject of doing more with more versus
doing more with less is addressed.
It calls into
question the dilution of paramedics distributed
over relatively low call volume, which is
evidenced in the fire department statistics I have
presented you today.
This calls into question the advantage of
having more less experienced medics versus a
smaller pool of highly qualified providers like
Collier County EMS utilizes.
On page five, it goes on to say that this
theory is thought-provoking, but not yet tested.
I totally disagree. Collier County EMS has
...~
6~"1
A""16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
been testing this very theory now for many, many
years.
I do not believe it is an accident nor a
quirk of numbers that we continue to have one of
the most cutting edge and highest survival
emergency medical systems on earth. And that is
due to a very thoughtful and carefully weaved net
of BLS, limited ALS and full ALS that we practice
in the county.
The last article, six, has three major and
important issues. BLS still trumps ALS in many
circumstances involving life and death, as
discovered by Ontario and the Ontario emergency
medical system. There should be more BLSjAED
equipped vehicles, and a small number of paramedic
units result in more frequent practice of ALS
skills and better outcomes.
I brought to you this compelling, dragged out
and lengthy, well-documented and substantiated set
of data on paramedic practice in Collier County
because I want you to have a better grasp of what
I have -- why I have not authorized the wholesale
credentialing of a wide range of paramedics in our
system.
Since I am authorized by the county to
establish the protocol at levels for paramedic
16/
38
.A
6
...,
., .",
~'0 .'..'if
39
1
practice and ultimately to safeguard the public
2
safety in terms of pre-hospital medical practice,
3
I ask that EMSAC stand with me in supporting the
4
standards of excellence that we have achieved and
5
the structure of our deployment of BLS and ALS
6
resources, and the credentialing processes that we
7
have had and used successfully in this county for
8
many, many years.
9
Thanks for your time.
10
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Yes, sir.
11
MIKE MURPHY,
Since I brought it
12
up, I might as well start.
13
First of all, I didn't bring this up as an us
14
against them issue.
I brought this up because,
15
number one, is if you read this report, and you
16
can read whatever you wish to in this report, and
17
I have a lot of admiration for Dr. Tober and the
18
system that's here.
19
But I do believe that we have an opportunity
20
and should seize opportunities to improve the
21
system as we develop these systems and as the
22
economics of this county dictate that we are a
23
service provider, and we need to coordinate this
24
system so that the growth of the system obviously
25
reflects what is necessary.
40
1
We have rural areas in this county. We have
2
other areas in this county. And we need to work
3
together in reference to providing the best system
4
we can provide.
5
You can look at statistics and I can go to
6
page 29 on this report, and it says additional ALS
7
engine personnel are not allowed to carry the same
8
medications and equipment as does Collier County
9
EMS, creating a fragmentation of patient care.
10
To further confuse this issue, many of the
11
personnel currently functioning in the ALS engine
program are current and/or former {inaudible}
12
13
county personnel with equal or greater training,
14
education, experience, as those operating on
15
county transport units. This inconsistency in
16
patient care also limits other personnel in
17
participating in the paramedic SWAP program from
18
performing certain skills and administering
19
certain medications simply due to the vehicle on
20
which they are deployed.
21
And yes, I go -- and you can go back on and
22
say that as you come up to the standards of
23
Collier County training, which I thought was the
24
issue, of what do we do to have to get there, how
25
can we improve this system in order that these
"if L .1
Jl.Oi
"',
. If
41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
individuals -- and we do have a lot of people.
I
would hesitate to say if you were to go through
the data and look at all the personnel and the
experience levels of the personnel, you know, it
becomes questionable. Why move somebody from one
agency to another agency and simply because they
change their patch, they suddenly can't do what
they could do before, yet, they have been trained.
So how do we improve the training component
of
DR. TOBER: Mike, you're missing the point.
It's not training. It1s ongoing experience.
MIKE MURPHY, Dr. Tober, please
let me finish.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, He didn't interrupt
you.
It's the same nonsense
DR. TOBER,
(inaudible) .
MIKE MURPHY,
It's not the same
nonsense, Doctor.
DR. TOBER,
It is the same nonsense, Mike.
1'm sorry.
MIKE MURPHY: There are
(inaudible) .
DR. TOBER,
It's the same exact nonsense that
16 I A .,
42
161
I
/
...~
1
you1ve said about improving training.
2
MIKE MURPHY, There are 316 ALS
3
(inaudible) .
4
DR. TOBER: I have just spent a half a hour
5
showing everybody in this room --
6
MIKE MURPHY,
(Inaudible) .
7
DR. TOBER,
the reason why we have a cadre
8
of highly practiced paramedics that make the
9
decision making and a group of paramedics that
10
help them.
11
How much plainer do I have to be about this?
12
MIKE MURPHY, You are plain. And
13
I have the right and the ability to question.
14
DR. TOBER, All right. I don't have to
15
listen to it.
16
MIKE MURPHY, You don't.
17
MIKE MURPHY: Let me finish,
18
please.
19
NANCY LASCHEID, Mr. Chairman
20
MIKE MURPHY, I just want to
21
bring up another point.
22
We're talking about, in Marco Island, 197
23
calls. First of all, let's give credit where
24
credit is due. The crews that go out there every
25
day do their job. They are a crew. They're a
.--,.-..-------.-.
1
team. They're individuals. There are three
2
paramedics show up on a scene, two paramedics show
3
up on a scene, they work as a crew.
4
This lead paramedic issue is correct. The
5
first paramedic on the scene in most agencies is
6
the lead paramedic who makes the decisions for the
7
process that takes place in reference to that
8
patient care, whether they're there four minutes,
9
five minutes, and they work as a team to get the
10
job done.
11
The data and the statistics obviously show
12
that if 197 times procedures were done on Marco
13
Island, what's the ratio? We keep referring to
14
these people that rarely deliver substantive care,
15
yet they're on the scene -- 80 percent of the time
16
in this county, they're on a scene. So why don't
17
we train those people to the levels of their
18
capabilities.
19
DR. TOBER: They are trained to those levels.
20
NANCY LASCHEID, Mr. Chairman.
21
I'm going to
MIKE MURPHY,
22
recognize (inaudible)
23
I'm not hearing
NANCY LASCHEID,
24
training as much as I'm hearing practice of skill
25
with -- no, wait, excuse me.
43
161
~I
"
t.1
l
~It~"~
S"""
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
44
MIKE MURPHY, Absolutely. Okay.
NANCY LASCHEID, Excuse me.
MIKE MURPHY,
debate that.
NANCY LASCHEID,
I r m prepared to
Practice and
skill. And I'm telling the truth, I sat through
your presentation on October the 30th.
I am
highly questionable about the motivation as to why
you want to change protocol with something that is
so superb.
I read this book, too, from front to back a
couple of times.
I find it to be negative and
bias and it's all about statistics.
It's not
about the delivery of care to the level that we
have enjoyed in Collier County.
In addressing the issue of firefighters
versus EMS, I understand your question.
I think
your question is a valid question.
11m hard
pressed, as someone on this committee, to
understand if my passion in life was to be a
firefighter, which is admirable, why would I want
to be taking care of sick people, too?
It seems to me that the delivery of immediate
care to sustain the patient, coming from an
emergency background myself, makes sense. But
16 141'6
45
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
quite honestly, Mike, I'm really pushed for what
your motivation is, because I'm not reading what
you're reading. And when I
MIKE MURPHY, Your--
NANCY LASCHEID: No, excuse me.
I!m not finished.
MIKE MURPHY, Okay.
NANCY LASHEID, When I'm looking
at those --
MIKE MURPHY,
I wasnrt finished.
NANCY LASCHEID,
-~ statistics,
I'm seeing something that says, man, how are you
going to improve on something like this?
I don't think anything you said the last
meeting or this one holds any water.
MIKE MURPHY, You're entitled to
your opinion.
NANCY LASCHEID, Correct.
MIKE MURPHY,
I think that,
again, I do have -- it's amazing that a system,
such as Broward County, with 338 ALS units on the
road every single day, has training levels and
expects their people and their competency levels
to be the same throughout the county for delivery
of care. Yet, we --
16 J A
1
NANCY LASCHEID, And tell me about
2
your job over there.
3
MIKE MURPHY, What about my job?
4
NANCY LASCHEID, Yeah. Weren't
5
you in --
6
MIKE MURPHY, I was a fire chief.
7
NANCY LASCHEID, Uh-huh.
8
MIKE MURPHY, And actually, I've
9
been certified as a paramedic in the State of
10
Florida since 1976.
11
NANCY LASCHEID, I'm proud of you.
12
But I still donlt think that we need to interrupt
13
what's going on in this community. And my concern
14
is the skill level
15
MIKE MURPHY, You keep saying
16
interrupt. It's -- I think
17
NANCY LASCHEID, I disagree.
18
MIKE MURPHY: The reason we're
19
here talk -- that's right. You're allowed to
20
disagree. And the issue that we're talking about
21
is there are many people moving around in jobs
22
throughout this county and they're moving from EMS
23
systems over into fire. They're moving from fire
24
to EMS, and they are moving around.
25
NANCY LASCHEID, I cannot, for one
46
161
n
u
6
47
1
second, believe that the skill level is at the
2
acuity that it needs to be when you're moving
3
people
4
MIKE MURPHY, I think
5
(inaudible) .
6
NANCY LASCHEID, -- around --
7
MIKE MURPHY, I think if you do
8
an analysis of the actual skill levels and the
9
number of procedures being done by each individual
10
in the field, which is data that isnrt there, no
11
matter what anybody says, it doesn't exist. There
12
is -- the data of the actual procedures being done
13
by medics in the field on a daily basis is not
14
captured across the board.
15
There are -- you go back to -- we keep
16
talking about the lead medic making the
17
determination. First of all, I personally am
18
insulted for all the medics in -- that work in the
19
field in Collier County when a comment is made is
20
that when the lead medic shows up, we continue and
21
they should fall back to a helper status.
22
They're not -- they are a team to begin with.
23
And that's insulting to those people out there
24
that are doing the job.
25
(Inaudible) don't (inaudible).
DR. TOBER,
.'it t i
" ~
_l I.,
A "6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
"
-y "i'I.
,\ '~
48
MIKE MURPHY, They do their
procedure, but we cannot -- we cannot even get --
the EMS cannot document every procedure that every
one of their crews and all the crews that are
being done out there. And I think we donlt give
enough credit to those people that they are doing
those procedures out there.
NANCY LANSCHEID,
It sure smacks of
political innuendos, when, in fact, you have a
proven track record in Collier County.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Recognize
(inaudible) .
JEFF PANOZZO, Thank you.
r wanted to just make a comment about some of
Dr. Tober's comments and just please let me speak.
Doult interrupt.
I have a pretty extensive EMS background.
Certainly not like Dr. Toberrs, and I congratulate
Dr. Tober for a remarkable career. You've done
fantastic things. You are a mentor to me, and
thatrs the only way I look at you.
But I have to -- and the same to Jeff,
obviously, a senior medic. And I think you guys
are cutting yourself a little short by saying what
you said about work.
I'd have you work in our ED
16/
49
1
anytime, and the same with Jeff.
I'm sure could
2
get in an ambulance and do the same things,
3
lifesaving things at any point.
4
But I want to just, since you mentioned some
5
of my background, I want to just make sure it was
6
clear.
I have 12 years of emergency medicine
7
practice, a four-year residency, and I also was
8
involved in emergency medical services as a
9
paramedic for about ten years.
So add that up to
10
around 20 -- I think that's around 26 years,
11
right? 26 years?
12
I was thinking 35.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN,
13
Itrs amazing.
14
JEFF PANOZZO, And unfortunately,
15
it shows my age and some of the gray hair. So I
16
have been in this area a long time, but I want to
17
tell you a unique story, Mr. Chairman.
18
I was working as a fireman during medical
19
school. And we had a fire in the middle of the
20
night.
It was a private
It was a big incident.
21
residence. There were people in the home, and
22
they were looking for these people and these
23
individuals in the home.
24
I happened to be involved on the hose line.
25
I was working as a fireman.
I did have a star of
l4
11
fl
,t,F"'1).
.,.,'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
'-1 /'.'
I.,.
50
life on the side of my helmet, which meant that I
was a medic as well.
And in my job, my job was to find fire and
put the fire out. There were victims. There was
another team that was looking for victims. There
was an ambulance on the scene.
I was not part of
that ambulance, although I really wanted to be.
They did find some victims and they removed
those victims to a hospital. No more ambulances
were on the scene. And they subsequently found a
child, and I was the only medic left.
I was working on the hose.
I put the hose
down and I went and I attended to the patient. I
immediately began the resuscitation measures that
were necessary. EMTs assisted me. We had another
ambulance come in and off we went, okay?
So the point of the matter is that medics can
be firemen and firemen can be medics. This is
werre talking about enhancement here. We're not
talking about changing a level of care. All
right. We're talking about enhancement of the
service.
In the service I came from, you were a true
pit crew.
It wasnrt a two-man crew that told
other people you had to sit by. We were a true
:<1'..11,
"
r
A ,6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
51
pit crew. We could do activities of each
individual up to our level of certification.
I was a paramedic.
I could do anything that
any paramedic in an ambulance could do, and -- as
I worked as a fireman. And our jobs frequently
required it.
And 1'm sure those instances happen here in
Collier County probably almost weekly, at least,
and maybe even daily.
I just wanted to point that out. There's no
personal bias.
I have zero personal bias or
interest other than 11m very interested in EMS,
and I hope my career is long down here in Collier
County, and I'm the director of the emergency
department there, and that's where I will stay.
My only interest is in -- I have a huge
interest in this.
It goes back to my father. My
father was one of the first paramedics in
Illinois, and I owe it to my dad to do it.
I wanted to ask why, just a simple question,
why don't we allow the merging of these teams to
the full extent? Why not? What's -- what is
what is wrong with it?
You mentioned some things, Bob, but I do kind
of wonder about the (inaudible), because 80
161~
,6
"1
.;!"c_,
52
1
percent of the -- you mentioned 80 percent of the
2
calls are -- in fire service are EMS calls, and a
3
lot of those calls are attended by the fire
4
engines.
5
DR. TOBER, They start the call.
6
JEFF PANOZZO, Okay. They start
7
the call.
It seems pretty obvious --
8
DR. TOBER, They start -- they start the call
9
half the time.
10
But one of the problems is werve had nine
11
different separate entities here since I came
12
here.
In '81, I tried to push forward a movement
13
to consolidate all systems, and no one wanted to
14
hear from me.
15
And to the extent that we do things today,
16
again, I reiterate that the protocols that the
17
paramedic/firefighters carry and the drug boxes
18
they carry are more extensive than most emergency
19
medical systems.
20
So I, by no means, am tying their hands. All
21
11m saying is that the reality of calls is that 26
22
ambulances are the primary emersion mechanism of
23
taking care of patients. Okay? I don't need 60
24
ambulances.
I really need an expanded network of
25
BLS activity, which could go all the way to saving
;' A
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
a child in a fire, would still be mostly BLS is
what saves those people.
In Ontario, most of the cardiac arrests are
BLS saves. They1re not ALS saves. They're BLS
saves.
So it's not an issue of tying any patient
of any paramedicls hands or saying that a
paramedic is or is not better than another
paramedic.
It's where you live and what you do on
a daily basis.
I don't operate complex hydraulic pumps on
fire engines.
I don't have the first clue how to,
nor is that what my interest is. There are
paramedic firefighters who are first and foremost
expert rescue, high angle, whatever their
subspecialty may be in the fire service, and
secondarily, they are paramedics doing a good job
out there.
But for the most part, in the network that we
have built in this community for 30 years, they1re
only on scene an average of two to five minutes,
if they get there first, before another paramedic
who is making complex decision making on an
ongoing basis.
And just to take one issue with one thing you
.J~"
53
A
6
"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
said.
I'm perfectly happy to help you in the
emergency department. But before you lock me in
that place all night, I'm spending two months with
you, because I haven't done a lot of things in a
long time. And thatls -- that doesnlt make you
better than me, but your currency of experience is
higher than mine.
I've got paramedics sitting in this room
whose clinical and decision-making experience
continues to degrade because it's not what they do
every day, okay? One of the best paramedics --
l've got two of the best paramedics live ever met
in my life sitting in this room, but they're not
making complex decision making every day. And if
they came back to work for me, which l'd love,
they'd first go back with a field training officer
to get their feet wet again.
JEFF PANOZZO,
l'd just like to
say that you have an open invitation to come and
get those two months, then, because we could use
some other people, and we would not stop you from
that if you were interested.
DR. TOBER: No, no, l'd stop me.
I I d stop
me.
JEFF PANOZZO: We'd want you to be
54
161
A
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
involved, absolutely.
But that's the point. The point is it's a --
this is apolitical to me. This is patient
oriented. And I just wanted to make sure that was
clear. And I appreciate having the chance to talk
to the committee about it.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Just, as
(inaudible) chair privilege, I'll point out that
probably of anyone on the EMSAC committee, I'm
probably the most lay person in the room. While
you're all doing -- working on hoses and people,
l've been working on chemical stuff.
But I think maybe that gives me a unique
perspective, because I'm trying to see both sides
of the issues here.
I don't think there are
sides.
I think there's one big issue that has a
lot of spheres of influence, and 1'm trying to
make sure we just maintain a decorum in the room
and figure out what we can do.
Question for Chief Page. Action necessary,
no action necessary? Simply discussion and move
forward and staff reports?
CHIEF PAGE, Well, I would like
to make one comment on this.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN,
Sure.
55
16/
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
CHIEF PAGE: Within the EMS
department, I mean, I probably have 17 to 20
paramedics that are state certified that have
worked in other agencies before, but because they
havenrt gone through that training and with the
field training officers, they're not able to
practice on their own.
Now, that's the standard that the medical
director set for at least our department.
Whereas, a paramedic firefighter, it's not the
same. They don't have to -- they can operate
independently in a much faster time, without
riding on the ambulances at all.
So Mike -- if you're going to say a paramedic
firefighter from your department that hasn't
ridden or gone through that training like ours
have, and I think most of yours did, but --
MIKE MURPHY: That's correct.
That is the point.
CHIEF PAGE, But it's a little
bit different. I mean, it's a little bit
different, the amount of training you went
through. You had so many PCRs to go through and
things of that nature.
But r'm just saying that it is not the same
56
16rf
A
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
training, and certainly, in your case, Jim, with
your paramedic/firefighters, theyrve never even
served with Dr. Tober. But yet they're able to
practice, where my paramedics can't practice on
their own.
So there is a double standard here. And I
just want to say, you know, werre going to
continue, as an EMS agency, to follow the medical
directorls, you know, standard, whatever that is.
But it's not the same between the two agencies.
And I donlt know how you ever get there. But
one of the things that we did do -- because this
isnrt new about the number of paramedics.
I
think, as you all know, we used to be almost
completely double paramedic teams, and I only had
two or three full-time EMTs at all. And over the
years, through attrition, we now have about I
think, 30 full-time EMT positions to lessen the
number of paramedic to EMT ratios. That's the
standard now.
Now, I do have EMTs that go on to become
paramedics, and they're in that system, but that's
a good thing.
I mean, it's probably a fifth of
our service are EMTs. The rest are paramedics.
But not all of them have been through that
57
161
/'
.'1
.~
\,.c;/;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
58
training, but I!m just saying that is a
difference, and that's really the only comment I
have, okay, is the training standard.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, I'd like to
(inaudible) .
GAIL DOLAN, You go.
JIM MCEVOY, I just wanted to
break down the stereotype that firefighters are
firefighters and paramedics are paramedics and
firefighters don't want to do this paramedic
stuff.
The young men and women coming into the fire
service today, for the last 15 or so years,
understand that a vast majority of the calls that
they're going to run are medical. That's why they
gravitate to the medical training. That's why we
have so many paramedics on our staff today,
because that is what we do. We donlt simply put
out fires and sit and wait for the (inaudible) to
come off and see the smoke.
We're emergency medical service responders,
and as a priority, we1re emergency medical service
responders.
So don't think that firefighters
don't want to learn and be the best paramedics
161
a
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
59
that they possibly can. Thatrs their goal.
That's their focus.
Thatts all I wanted to say about that.
GAIL DOLAN, Well, perhaps we
can help solve this problem.
I've not been here
for 30, but rIve been here for 20 years.
I'm not
a paramedic, I'm not a firefighter.
I am a nurse,
but God, you wouldn't want me to take care of you.
I'm basically an administrator, but I have a
lot of experience with getting people to work
together to solve different issues.
This argument has been going on since I have
been here for 20 years. The paramedics want to do
it one way, the firefighters want to do it another
way. Who's going to do what first? Thatrs been
going on forever.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Uh-huh.
GAIL DOLAN, So my
recommendation would be is that you do have some
sort of a committee or work group, whatever you
want to say, to fix this problem, because itrs not
going to end.
Bob Tober could go to Tahiti tomorrow and
they would say, two days from that, Bob who. Then
what? You know, you have to think about those
](.
A
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
60
things.
Things change. The county grows. Economics
are different.
I mean, we could all go on and on.
I don't think any of you would disagree with that.
But I do think something has -- we do maybe
have to not change the outcomes or the quality
that we have because, in my mind, the patient is
number one. And I don't think anybody disagrees
with that here.
But I do think we all -- a group of you do
need to get together and talk about how we could,
not necessarily change the system, but make the
system so it's more of a team effort and not that
the firefighter has to back away from the
paramedic or whatever the scenario is, but somehow
change the system on how we work together.
Bob.
DR. TOBER: Most rank and file paramedics on
the street, whether they come from an engine
company or EMS, work fine together as a team, but
we have to have somebody who is the A, priority,
establish leader.
If and when there is conflict,
somebody has to have the reins of the horse in
their hands.
We have not had one single episode where a
~ Ift'~
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
fire or engine company has responded to a patient
and been standing around with their hands in their
pockets waiting for EMS to get there because they
could not render care.
It1s never happened.
If it did happen, and as I told Mike Brown,
show me where there are deficiencies or voids in
our safety net, and I will fix them. He hasn't
yet shown me any. And I don't know that any
exist.
So, we, number one, don't ever, ever have
somebody standing around, waiting for an ambulance
because they couldn't do care.
r've entrusted a
lot of trust and ability in the
firefighter/paramedics.
So don't confuse what I allow them to do with
not respecting them.
It's just the -- it1s just a
question of what do they do full time and how far
do they take it.
You wouldn't take the least experienced
firefighter you have and send them to take charge
of a major building fire, and we don't do the same
thing, okay? You've got fire specialists. We
have medical specialists. You have BLS and ALS
engine specialists. We have the final decision
makers who transport these people to the hospital.
16/
61
A
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
4t) a
62
There1s nothing wrong with this system. This
system has still managed a survival, in cardiac
arrest, of 37 percent, and with all due respect to
Broward County, their -- I just gave them a
lecture on cardiac arrest. They1re at 4 percent.
So we are doing something right here, and I
have no intention of diluting the
patient/paramedic contact much further than I do.
I mean, I need -- I need -- I need a lot of
Indians to keep people alive, and I need less
chiefs. But you can only have so many chiefs in a
system.
But when the Indians and the chiefs work
together on a street level, theyrre all working
fine (inaudible). That's not where I have the
issues.
I have the issues at this level. Not on
not on the street.
There are very, very few confrontations on
the street.
If there are, we have a training
department that tries to settle it, and if there1s
still an issue, I step in as the last court of
decision. But for the most part, it works fine,
smoothly, and they are teams.
So don1t confuse respect with what you do day
by day and how often you do it. And I don't
A
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
disrespect my own paramedics who I put on the ALS
engines, who every other month I pull back to a
transport unit and say you need to go and do this
for a month so you don't lose any of those tough
decision-making skills. It's just practice.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Before we have any
more discussion with inside the committee itself,
let me ask the chief, the expectations of
least an advisory recommendation from this
committee, in any direction, or are we simply just
at
debating a very difficult issue?
I'm looking for the expectations while we
still have a quorum.
I doubt that we're going to
see any sort of wisdom of Solomon then come out of
out committee today.
CHIEF PAGE,
I'm just going
to -- even if we put it to a vote, obviously, the
medical director is the sole authority.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, We're just an
advisory commission.
CHIEF PAGE, Not even the board
can tell you what he's going to do and grant.
So -- but as a matter of interest, I would
have an interest in how many, you know, where they
feel, on which side or the other. But I'm
16 , A 6
63
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
certainly not going to ask the chair to poll the
committee.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, The chair has no
problem doing that. It1s just that I'm just
wondering if that's something that would be of any
value or necessity (inaudible).
MIKE MURPHY, Since (inaudible)
again, again, I don't expect a vote, and I don't
expect somebody to try to tell Dr. Tober what to
do. This is communications and discussion. This
is an issue that is out there, and it is something
that impacts the EMS community in the delivery of
service. And that's what this board is here for.
So our discussion on it is good.
DR. TOBER, You're the
chairman. 1111 give this to you.
MIKE MURPHY, So bottom line, I
don't -- there1s no vote going to be taken here to
say Dr. Tober, you shall do this or not do that.
And I would -- I respect him as the medical
director. Again (inaudible).
DR. TOBER,
(Inaudible) I've got to go catch
a plane and go to Tampa (inaudible).
MIKE MURPHY: And I've got a
meeting, too.
16 r APg
64
1
DR. TOBER: This is one protocol, okay? We
2
have a very, very integrated, highly effective
3
system now.
I have still -~ I'm the medical
4
director here and I cannot tell you one medical
5
reason that I would give ALS engine paramedics any
6
more clinical liberties or any more training.
7
They don't get to do -- all these protocols, and
8
they take it to the green level on every one of
9
these pages, they don1t ever reach the bottom of
10
these green levels, okay?
11
If we had a
if we had a difficulty or if
12
we had a void in the system, we would fix it
13
immediately. Everybody who knows me, and there
14
are lots of you in this room that have worked for
15
me for many years, when I know there's a problem,
16
it is fixed yesterday, okay?
17
The one thing I wasn1t gifted with was any
18
political nonsense.
I call a spade a spade.
19
Okay? You give me a solid, intelligible and
20 substantive reason to go and bring a huge amount
21 of training to 80 to 100 additional men who won1t
22 ever touch those skills unless they come to work
23 for EMS, or we have some other reformulated,
24 consolidated system here and throw out every
25 single structure that we now have, and then
......
,
161
65
A
6
-~'-~"~--"'-~'''---,"'-'' -----~.._-_.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
rebuild the system again with a different number
of transport ambulances, it1s just never going to
happen.
NANCY LASCHEID, Mr. Chairman,
this is a lot of material. We have focused on an
issue where there is a success rate within the
community.
There's enough material in here statistically
as to the growth of Collier County that we have
enough to work with.
If, in fact, this issue, and
as Gail said, this has been around, we've been
here longer than Gail has, so this has been around
for quite awhile.
If this issue is to have resolution, itrs not
going to be at this table with people who have
different opinions. There's enough material in
here for us to go forward and enjoy what is status
quo in Dr. Tober's department.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Thank you. And I
believe the fact that we1re going to have a
subcommittee go look on the master plan.
NANCY LASCHEID: Oh, won't we have
fun?
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Along with that.
So, therefore, I would like to bring this
16
66
l
1
l.,..
LJ
,u?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
discussion to a close and move on to the section
of staff report, because I know Chief Murphy has
to leave at 3:30. I will be losing a quorum.
CHIEF PAGE: Okay.
MIKE MURPHY, So in terms of
(inaudible). Is there any action that needs to be
taken (inaudible)?
CHIEF PAGE, No. I mean,
actually, it was your topic. I didn't want to
steal it from you. That was
MIKE MURPHY: No, that1s okay.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE,
(Inaudible) .
MIKE MURPHY, I don't know if
anybody in the audience wishes to speak on it.
Probably not.
CHIEF PAGE, We don't have any
registered speakers, right?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE,
(Inaudible) .
CHIEF PAGE, Okay. The only
thing with staff and report is we're currently
down ten positions full time. l've got how many
part-time positions in? Five or six?
JENNIFER FLORIN, Six.
CHIEF PAGE: Six. So I'm
probably -- I have the support of Mr. Summers of
67
161A 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
68
actually going to the manager's office to see if
we can pick up
I've got one full-time employee
that wants to go back to part-time. So maybe I
can pull a part-timer up to his spot. So welre
going to be looking to go to the manager for some
support on that.
But other than that, that's really all I have
to report.
So are there any questions?
MIKE MURPHY,
(Inaudible) action
by this board in reference to support (inaudible)?
Wouldn't it be good to carry a voice that this
voice would be in favor of that?
CHIEF PAGE, Well, I would like
to get to at least my minimum manning. But the
other side of that, Mike, is that it's a budget.
I can -- when we were fully staffed at the
beginning of this budget year, I had to lose like
nine positions just to make my budget for the
reductions they gave us.
So I think I'm going to be able to do this on
my own, but if I'm not, I'll certainly come back
to you and let you know, so
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Very good. You say
we have no registered speakers for public comment?
This is the biggest audience live ever seen.
16 1 A 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, No. I think
Diane (inaudible) like to speak (inaudible).
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, I don't think we
realized we needed to register.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, It's up to the
chair.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Okay.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, I think there is
one.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, The chair -- if the
committee is (inaudible) some latitude, 1'm
willing to entertain, for at least a (inaudible)
time, some speakers, since there was such a large
attendance.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Sure.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Come up.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, I'd like to thank
everybody for coming. This is the (inaudible). I
was in good company.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Yes, you were.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, (Inaudible) .
MS. WATSON: Hi. My name is Lieutenant Diana
Watson (phonetic). I work for East Naples Fire.
r know everybody here. I worked for Collier
County EMS for 11 years. And I just want -- I
16/ A 6
69
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
70
know this topic has been going on for a long time.
Since I've been here, too.
Very interesting going from the EMS side to
the fire side, as I'm sure is for Greg going from
the fire side to the EMS side, because itrs a
completely different perspective.
One of the things I want to say is, listening
to Dr. Tober speak concerns me.
I love Dr. Tober.
He's my mentor as well. He brought me up.
But one of the things that concerns me is
werre so stuck on they1re only on scene by
themselves for two to four minutes. Well, two to
four minutes isn't the number we should be looking
at. How long are we on scene total with that
patient, you know, how long -- are we providing
patient care as a team?
And my feeling -- when I went to East Naples,
you know, I left Collier County for a reason.
I
mean, East Naples was a better opportunity for me,
and what I realized, after being there for a
couple of months, was I was looking at it wrong.
East Naples Fire Department paramedics and EMTs
didn't have to do it on their own, that the team
approach is what it1s all about, because that's
better for the patient, and that's always been Dr.
,"".'
16 I
A"~6
71
1
Tober1s mantra.
2
And it concerns me when we start trying to
3
pigeonhole people into one place based on they're
4
there two minutes ahead of time, because, in my
5
opinion, when somebody becomes a paramedic, they
6
become a nurse, they become a doctor, they become
7
an EMT. They have a responsibility to maintain
8
their level of certification and their knowledge
9
and their skills. That1s your responsibility when
10
you take that on.
11
So what I always encourage my guys at East
12
is, you know what, you may be only able to
13
function in the green of the protocol, but you
14
need to know the blue, which is rescue paramedic
15
protocol, because you know what, when you're on
16
scene and the patient is going down the drain, and
17
that paramedic is sitting there with five
18
different things he needs to do, if you're
19
standing there going, I don't know that part of
20
the protocol, sorry, I'm not required to know it
21
because I'm only an ALS engine level, who is that
22
fair to?
23
And by differentiating out who can only go to
24
what level, I think you separate the
25
paramedic/firefighters and make the -- it
1 f. ;OJ ;:~~
l.
,.I ,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
belittles their capabilities and what they can do.
And the fact is, is that if you go to any ER,
every nurse doesn't have the same knowledge and
capabilities.
So you want them all to have
knowledge and capabilities, but when you're in
there working together, you know that there's
always one person that's stronger in calculations
than the other person.
And I agree that there should be a lead
medic.
I don1t agree it always has to be the
Collier County EMS medic, because the fact is
there's been a high turnover. A lot of them are
inexperienced. Your most experienced medic may
not be from Collier County EMS.
And you can say they're the lead medic, but
that1s not how it falls out. Just like in an ER
room, if you have someone that's brand new to your
department, they may have more critical care
capability than someone that's been there for 20
years.
Inevitably, when the patient is going down
the drain, that person will step in and start
taking over just from the standpoint that everyone
around knows they have those capabilities.
So why pigeonhole somebody into a position
where if I'm on scene and I see something with
72
161
A
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
73
patient care that's being done incorrectly because
now my certification is lower than it was when I
worked with EMS, I can't function at that level
anymore, why shouldn't I be able to say, hang on.
You know what, I don't think you should do it that
way, and because patient care is what it's all
about. You have to have the ability to function
at that level.
And the other thing that always strikes me
when dealing with EMS, just over the last year
I've seen this, because when I was on the EMS
side, it was like whatever you want to do, the
fire departments do it. They're trying to take
our jobs. So go for it.
You know what? In a year, I've completely
done an about face. They keep talking about how
our skills are going down and theyrre, you know,
getting degraded because we don't have patient
contact and all those things I but at the same
time, we're required, in order to have a ALS SWAP
program, to have one of their paramedics on our
ALS engine, but their firefighter paramedic is
only there six months out of the year. He gets
six months of trainingl when our guys get 12
months of training in firefighting.
'13
1 ",
'"
1"1
;7
i;'~~-;\
:', ..
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
So we1re forced into that to have the ALS
engine agreement. How is that fair? We have
someone on our unit thatts only there six months,
half the time, to learn the same skills and have
the same knowledge as our firefighters.
So if you want parity and you want things to
be fair, then be fair.
If you don't want -- if
you're going to say, on one hand, that the
firefighter paramedics from the fire departments
cantt keep up their skills because they don't ride
a unit, then let1s be fair. Do the EMS
paramedic/firefighters have the skill to ride a
fire truck and respond to structure fires? I
don! t know.
And am I saying one is right, one is wrong?
NO.
I think both sides are equally capable, and I
think that when we're in this position where we're
talking about it, itts very easy to throw out
numbers.
You know, when I see that data on the screen,
I'm very suspect, because I know for a fact we've
only been putting in trip tickets for, I don't
know, four or five months, and even now, our data
is not completely accurate because our system
hasn't been able to verify.
.;0'1 d;~ A 6
iN ~...
-!j'J "",)
74
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
So when I look at those numbers, 1'm suspect.
And not that I wouldn't love for our guys to have
put in that many tickets, but I just -- I don't
know where those numbers are coming from.
So when you're looking at this from a
committee, I completely understand the worry about
skills. But let me tell you, at least from East
Naples, our paramedics get six hours of medical
training a month. Our EMTs get three hours of
medical training a month, plus all the calls and
everything else they do.
I would like to know, and I know EMS provides
direct (inaudible) services every other month for
their paramedics. So if werre going to talk about
training and skills, I think the fire departments
will step up and start doing things, you know, to
make people feel more comfortable, but I think
part of the problem is that there's no parity.
It's expected for the fire departments to do
what they're told to do, and yet, on the flip side
of that, we have no recourse, because we want to
provide ALS engines for our people, and Collier
County holds the certificate of public necessity.
So, you know, werre trying to get along to
get along, but at the same time, don't cut down
16/
75
.';
?o
~.".1"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
76
what we are as paramedics.
I will always consider
myself a paramedic first. And, you know, the fact
is, is that I would put myself up against any
Collier County paramedic, except for Michelle
Williamson and -- any day of the week. And I
would take my medics from East Naples and put them
up against Collier County EMS medics any day of
the week. Sit them down. Do a board. We1re
ready to go.
And I think that North feels the same way,
and you know, these other departments that are up
and coming feel the same way, and I think that
it's something, instead of looking at it as us
versus them, letrs start looking at it as a whole,
the whole patient outcome, because you know what,
the cardiac arrest resuscitation rate means
nothing if NCH doesn't get them out the door or
Physicians doesn't get them out the door. That
rate means absolutely nothing.
So if you guys don't do your jobs, ours means
absolutely nothing. We're a team. That's what
needs to be focused on, always as a team, instead
of as an us versus them.
I don't care about the two minutes of BLS or
ALS care that my guys provide.
I want to know,
16/A 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
77
were they able to do skills in the back and help
that patient, you know, did they help the EMS
medic or were they a hindrance? You know, that's
what's important.
That's all I have to say.
GAIL DOLAN: So have we ever
gotten the fire chiefs and the EMS chiefs together
in a room?
MIKE MURPHY, Yes. Actually,
there is an EMS subcommittee that operates, which
is designed to bring forward things, and one of
their recommendations was one common protocol and
elevate the training levels of the paramedics in
the field for better basic care.
GAIL DOLAN, And what happened
to that?
MIKE MURPHY, The medical
director (inaudible).
CHIEF PAGE: Don't make it so
simple here. Now, listen, because now you're
going to get me upset. But I want to make it
clear, your guys have never agreed to do the same
level of training, period.
When a matrix was decided, you didn't even
want to require them to have 72 hours in a year
'7([ A'6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ride time. 50--
MIKE MURPHY, Absolutely. And
again, I go back to the basic {inaudible} premise.
If you were to analyze every paramedic's skill
thatrs being done in the field by every
individual, you will find that X percent only
deliver babies, X percent only start IVs, X
percent. There is no data that's there.
How you maintain skill levels, because there
aren't that many procedures done in the field
anywhere -- how you maintain levels is through a
phenomenal training program and skill evaluation
program, and an excellent QA, QI system.
There were 88 paramedics out of 122 employees
on my system.
I expected every single one of them
to function to the highest level of capability.
Were there individuals who could do cut-downs in
the field, were there individuals who administered
TPA and paralytics and all of those things? Yes,
there were, but it wasn1t a blanket statement that
says because you arrived on the fire truck, you
weren1t capable of doing the job. And that's
where I feel it1s an insult to these individuals
out here.
Let1s elevate the training level. This isn1t
161
78
.~
6
79
1
political. This is a fact of, as years ago, I
2
came to this county, sat down with the county
3
administrator of this county and said, why aren1t
4
we maximizing the utilization of existing
5
personnel in the field to their greatest
6
capability to the advent of the citizens and the
7
service we deliver in this county.
8
And instead, this is us against them, and
9
it's not. What it needs to be is improvements to
10
the city. And that's my political speech. And I
11
do have to leave.
12
I apologize, but I do have a conference call
13
with my medical -- with my city manager in less
14
than 30 minutes.
15
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, The chair is going
16
to recognize another speaker.
17
MIKE MURPHY, Thanks.
I'm sorry.
18
MR. WATSON: Well, I'm Eric Watson. Most of
19
you in the room know me, and those of you that
20
don't, I worked for EMS for 17 years, 17 plus
21
years, and I've had the opportunity and taken
22
advantage of, to teachJ at Edison, the paramedic
23
program. And I've probably trained, I don't know,
24
a good handful of the paramedics.
I'd like to
25
think the better paramedics that work for Collier
Ir-Cl j;
Vi
A
6
80
1
County EMS right now.
2
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, What school is
3
that?
4
MR. WATSON, Edison.
5
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Edison?
6
MR. WATSON: Yes. And you know, it!s a
7
unique perspective, because I did the opposite of
8
what Greg did earlier.
I left EMS, went into the
9
private sector, something completely different,
10
and found myself coming back and had cross-trained
11
years ago, but originally was an EMT and paramedic
12
since 1984, and chose to go back into the fire
13
service side of things and look at it from that
14
perspective.
15
And you know, I would offer up that I agree
16
with some of the statistics that Dr. Tober says.
17
I mean, the fact of the matter is, Oxytocin, I
18
don't know how many people in here are medical or
19
not medical, but Oxytocin and your Dopamines and
20
your Captoprils, very, very rarely touch, but I
21
would offer up, in opposition to that, is there
22
nothing worse in the world, and I think we've all
23
been in that situation before, than needing a
24
phillips head screwdriver and all you1ve got is a
25
flat head, need a ten millimeter socket and all
16/
fr~.
1~
~L,
81
1
you've got is a nine.
It absolutely, positively
2
stinks.
3
And you know what the fact of the matter is,
4
the reality of it is? More often than not,
5
statistically, you're not going to touch those
6
meds in the first ten minutes. He's absolutely
7
right with that perspective. But from my
8
perspective, and I'm telling you, you know, Diana
9
said she wouldn1t lay her skills down in front of
10
Michelle Williamson, I'll lay them down to anybody
11
in the country, because I stay sharp, I teach, I
12
keep up on these things.
13
So, you know, from my perspective on the fire
14
side, and lId also like to think that the guys in
15
the department I'm with now does not participate
16
in the ALS engine program.
It's Big Corkscrew
17
(inaudible) Fire Rescue, they do the BLS
18
perspective.
19
What I can tell you is we've got six
20
paramedics out there, and 11m going to playa
21
large role in their training, and trust me,
22
they're going to be sharp.
I'd like to think that
23
I just graduated 21 of 22 from Edison that are
24
coming out, and I promise you, they're not
25
cookbook medics. They know their anatomy and
-'l
'A
i
, .
6
";.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
82
physiology. They understand alpha and beta
receptors and how they work and how they interact
with meds and all of those things.
So it, really, a lot of it does come back to
training. And the reality of it is, a lot of the
skills that you're going to practice out there,
mechanical skills, Dr. Tober might have fallen off
the bike a few times, but within a couple months,
herlI learn to ride a bike again, as he admitted
himself.
The reality of it is, a good paramedic and
what makes them a good paramedic ultimately is
assessment, you know, the ability to recognize a
critical situation, and then intervene
appropriately. And that's where the training
makes a difference.
I would offer up that one of the things, as
an example, that's frustrated me in this new
protocol roll-out that we just did was -- and I'll
make two points in this.
One, that these -- that ALS engine paramedics
can't do 12 lead ECGs.
12 lead ECGs, they're not
invasive.
Itls not like 11m intubating somebody.
It's not like 11m using a (inaudible).
It's not
like I'm doing external jugular or an internal or
161
,'I
H
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
a femoral.
And yet, I go back, I've been an ACLS
instructor now 15, 16 years, and I go back to that
chain of survival that the American Heart
Association has been preaching for well over a
decade, early access and early recognition. Well,
I don't have a 12 lead ECG, and we look where we
are in treating MIs, I can't recognize a
myocardial infarction. And you know what, from a
paramedic's perspective, a skilled paramedic, I'm
not worried about the guy that's wringing wet and
is hypotensive and short of breath and crushing
chest pain, because Stevie Wonder can see he's
having an MI.
But if early recognition is really what it's
about, then I need that 12 lead ECG.
I would
offer up, why did EMS purchase the audio course?
Early recognition. They want to be able -- they
-- somebody theorized out there that these S
sounds and murmurs and everything else, that the
heart physically makes sounds when it1s going
through an infarction.
And so early recognition and early access,
being non-invasive, why don1t all paramedics in
Collier County be held to the 12 lead ECG
83
161A
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
84
standard? I can understand not giving them
Dopamine, although I can tell you I can recognize
somebody in cardiogenic shock like that. And you
give me the team of two guys that I work with on a
regular basis, I'll be on it.
I'm telling you
right now I'll drop a Dopamine drip in well under
five minutes it will take me to assess, recognize,
appropriately diagnose and then treat that
patient.
But that's me. And you know what?
Statistically, we can go back and we can look and
see what these paramedics are doing.
I will tell
you in 1987, when I came to work for Collier
County EMS, Terri {inaudible} was my trainer.
Man, oh, man. Tough little trainer. And she got
on me, got in my face one day at the ER. You have
got to know this stuff cold. Do you realize where
you're going to be in three or four months?
Youlre going to be sitting in front of Tober and
you have to know this stuff cold and you've got to
be sharp. And I said, you know what, Terri, I
said, the fact of the matter is, 11m a one-year
(inaudible) .
I'm so afraid of missing something
and zoning in, it1s not even funny. Now, you give
me your seven years of experience, and 1'11 be
16/A 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
85
just as sharp if not sharper than what you are.
So somebody's ability to recognize and then
appropriately treat a patient, I'll draw a strong
correlation to overall experience, not just skill
degradation, but overall experience.
I mean, there's -- 1'm out there running
calls. I'm on an engine. A lot of these people in
this room aren't even out running front line
calls. Like Dr. Tober said, just not out running
calls. Danis not out running calls. Wayne's not
out running calls. Greg is, but for the most
part, if you're -- I'm out there running calls.
11m running calls with six month medics that went
through that regimented training program, and I'm
recognizing -- I've recognized stuff in a third of
the time of what they're recognizing it for no
other reason than my experience and nudging them,
hey, it's this, it1s not that. You know, or just
guide them down that track.
of that situation.
And I think the other frustrating thing was,
So that1s the reality
when this whole ALS engine argument carne about,
what, I don't know, probably ten years ago, Dan?
Something like that. Seven, eight years ago.
In
the fire service, in Collier County, there weren1t
16./ A 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
86
a whole lot of paramedics. And what paramedics
they had, had gone through the training program at
Edison and graduated. So there wasn't a lot of
actual street experience.
Well, now, thatls changed as a result of some
issues that EMS had with the commission or
whatever, and a high turnover rate, George. Where
is he? How many years of experience?
JORGE AUGILLERA,
20 plus.
MR. WATSON,
20 plus myself, now.
Paramedic
for 20 years now.
Diane, how many, ten? Andrea, how many?
You got 40 or 50 years of experience sitting
in the room that were trainers.
I've got an EFTO
pin in my little box on my dresser at home from
when I worked for EMS.
CHIEF PAGE, Yeah, bring that
back.
MR. WATSON, And now Jeff wants it back.
I
was going to keep it and put it on my (inaudible)
and hang it in a shadow box one day.
But the fact of the matter is, yourre sitting
on 40, 50 years of experience in training thatrs
available to the fire service now. And trust me,
these guys, we're training them. I hit my guys
""
f ~
I
'6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
87
161 A
6
hard, I'll tell you that.
And so from that perspective, I just go back
to that little thing. Nothing stinks worse than
needing a phillips head screwdriver when all you
have is a flat head. And some of the Collier
County EMS paramedics are going to get parts of
that protocol because of skills, because of
experience and assessment abilities, and that will
progress in time as they age and as they get to
where I'm at. And trust me, I didn't have that
confidence level when I was a one year medic that
I have now, you know, that I had when I was a ten
year medic.
So I think it's frustrating. You know, an
example is the 12 lead ECG.
I don't argue the
point with the Captoprils and the Dopamines and
the stuff like that, because hers right. For the
most part, you're not going to touch it in a lot
of instances.
But by the same token, I would. And there
are medics out there that were trained that will
touch it. The ones that aren't comfortable or
don't recognize the situation won't do it.
That's all. Thank you.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Thank you.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
88
GAIL DOLAN, This gentleman
just confirms, and I don't know him from that
screen up there, but he just confirms what I said.
You're going to have to get together with the
bosses and the chiefs and all these people with
experience like that, and you're going to have to
come up with some sort of resolution that makes
everybody in agreement.
Obviously, you're not in agreement here. I
mean, you might have that committee, but --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, I think we're at
impasse.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, (Inaudible) .
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, You can't -- can't
the committee (inaudible).
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE,
(Inaudible) .
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, No, I don't. That
hurts.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, He's your boss.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Oh.
(Inaudible) .
MR. WATSON: I mean, lIve been
teaching there for years.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE,
(Inaudible) .
JEFF PANOZZO, Jeff, I think he
needs a raise.
1
!,~\
f\
6
89 16 I A '6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Thanks a lot.
JEFF PANOZZO, And can't the
committee, can't we just draft a letter to -- is
it the Collier --
GAIL DOLAN: Commissioners.
JEFF PANOZZO, -- Board of
Commissions?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Yes.
JEFF PANOZZO, And ask them, plead
with them to address this? I mean, I don't think
we need a
we don't need a -- I mean, something
has to -- we have to come up with something today.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN,
I think we -- if I
understand our role, and I (inaudible) the
spectrum of influence that we might have. It's in
trying to take a bunch of data and look at
positions like this and make a recommendation
through the appropriate agency to the Board on
actions they might take.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Would it be
appropriate for us to make a position on the fact
that there is such a wide (inaudible). I'm
sitting here learning a great deal today. I find
myself, as, once again, on both sides of this
issue. I mean, we could do that. I'm not sure
90
1
(inaudible) .
2
JEFF PANOZZO, We don't have
3
(inaudible) draft a letter of our intention.
4
Exactly what you said. I agree with you
5
totally
6
NANCY LASCHEID, If we agree.
7
JEFF PANOZZO VOICE, -- that --
8
JEFF ALLBRITTEN,
(Inaudible) sitting
9
on the --
10
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, No.
11
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, My guess is, just
12
my guess is if we went to a vote, we'd be split
13
about four, four (inaudible).
14
JEFF PANOZZO, But do we want this
15
to continue for another 20 years? I don't think
16
so.
17
GAIL DOLAN, I don't think so.
18
NANCY LASCHEID: I don't think so,
19
but as I said, you know, therels a lot of material
20
in here unrelated to what we1re talking about, and
21
you're also forming a subcommittee who's going to
22
come back with some kind, hopefully, some kind of
23
outline that will then be discussed again.
24
It's not going to be resolved today. I mean,
25
it hasn't been resolved for years. And I would
161
}~
h
~"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
hope that at some point we can take the political
innuendo, we can take the personal challenges out
of it and we can go forward.
I don1t think we need to do anything today.
We've got a solvent system.
It's just a matter of
moving forward with the project. And as far as
making that kind -- I understand where you're
coming from because you want to bring closure to
something and go forward, but I don't think we're
there yet.
So in respect to that, I would say, yes,
that's something we could probably look at, but
we're not there yet would be my recommendation.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN,
( Inaudible)
subcommittee (inaudible) framework where a
discussion could roll (inaudible). Because
obviously it's not going -- it1s not going to be
pleasing. Whatever we did today, even if we had a
quorum, I'm afraid would be
JEFF PANOZZO,
I'm not a real -- I
don't like to meet, meet, and meet, especially now
you1re listening to
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Really?
JEFF PANOZZO: Well, you're
hearing -- you're hearing some passionate pleas on
16 I A 6
91
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
all sides here.
CHIEF PAGE: Jeff, excuse me,
though, man. I mean, I could have brought in all
my paramedics today, too, but that wasn't what we
had planned to do. I mean, you're hearing from
the fire side, yes, but I can tell you that my
paramedics that have to go through the training
that they're not required to do would be just as
vocal as saying why don't
why give them
certification to perform when my own people canlt?
I mean --
NANCY LASCHEID, My understanding
of today --
JEFF PANOZZO,
(Inaudible) the
gentleman that spoke, that Bob invited up and
spoke (inaudible) that spoke.
NANCY LASCHEDI, My impression of
what was to happen today was that Chief Murphy had
had some very strong feelings at the meeting on
the 30th and had shared those, and it was an
opportunity of Dr. Tober to present some of the
additional data.
So as far as my perception of today's meeting
was we were still gathering data.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN: That's correct.
C;i
'I
Ii.
A
6
92
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
93
NANCY LASCHEID, That was my
understanding. Not that we were making
resolution.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Right.
I couldntt
garner, by reading simply the minutes or reading
any comments between members, exactly the level of
the issue.
NANCY LASCHEID, Oh, you weren't
there at the last I thought (inaudible)
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, We had (inaudible)
NANCY LASCHEID, Yeah, I'm sorry.
JEFF ALLBRITTEN,
(Inaudible) .
So
I'm getting quite an education today.
I certainly
wouldn't be in a position to render an opinion on
my own just as one member of this committee.
So I
think you1re kind of -- Nancy is absolutely right.
We are simply still in fact finding.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE,
(Inaudible) .
GAIL DOLAN,
So if you're at
an impasse, as you say that you are, correct? You
would say that you basically haven't solved the
issue.
CHIEF PAGE, Well, I don't think
there's -- if they don't want to go through the
same training, then how do we do it? I mean,
"",.
","'
ff
~
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
either hers got to lessen the training that the
EMS paramedics have to do in those tirnelines and
them going from zone to zone each month. Our guys
have got to have the same deal. And if it's, you
know what, we're going to dummy it down to it's a
couple of weeks training and nobody has to ride
anymore, that's fine.
I just want my same guys.
GAIL DOLAN, Okay. But maybe
therers a solution.
For instance, rather than
let's not focus on the training part, although
that might very well be the issue. Letts -- how
about we focus on patient outcomes? I mean, 1'm
not saying that's the (inaudible)
Letts focus on
patient outcomes and see.
So if you say to the firefighters, okay, you
know, tell us whatever your training is.
I mean,
I have no idea. Neither do I have any idea about
the paramedics. But maybe there1s some sort of
correlation we can make between the two and say to
the firefighters, okay, you do this, this and
this, and EMS does this, this and this, but
they're the same or whatever.
And then you see, after two months or one
month or six months, however you want to measure
it, how do the patients fare.
161
94
'~!
6
,
,
95
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NANCY LASCHEID, Outcome studies
are always a measurement. That's
GAIL DOLAN, Absolutely.
NANCY LASCHEID, -- always the
best thing to do.
GAIL DOLAN, So if you do some
evidence-based guidelines, just like we do for
everything else, why donlt you do the exact same
thing for that. And then this will definitely,
will go away either way, because you're going to
find out (inaudible).
CHIEF PAGE: Not necessarily
Gail, because Dr. Tober calls the shots,
ultimately.
(Inaudible) .
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE,
GAIL DOLAN, Okay.
JIM MCEVOY: Six years ago, we
didn1t have firefighters practicing as paramedics
in the county at all, in no way, shape or form.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Uh-huh.
JIM MCEVOY, Through much
discussion and cooperation, we developed an ALS
program, and they were even more strict or more
restrictions put on the firefighters three years
ago and four years ago than there are now.
16:
A
6
~
96
1
It has evolved. As George will tell you, we
2
predicted it would.
It would evolve, but we
3
needed to take the baby steps and get a true ALS
4
delivery system going throughout the county in all
5
the fire stations.
6
This is the last little piece. This is the
7
last unfinished bit, and what we have are two
8
immovable forces. We have the fire service saying
9
we want to be able to -- we want to be considered
10
equal to the paramedics in Collier County
11
Emergency Medical Service.
12
Dr. Tober, you can -- you can agree with what
13
he says or disagree with what he says. He's not
14
moving. He hasn't moved.
I think that his logic
15
is not.
I don't find what he's saying,
16
that less is better, that -- being logical.
17
Somehow or other, it makes me think that I'm being
18
snowed under, have a pillow case put over my head
19
or something.
20
But this is the last little piece. And we
21
have tried and we have mentioned this, and I've
22
heard Dr. Tober saying the same spiel for six
23
years, that it's just not going to happen.
24
As far as training is concerned, training is
25
one thing.
Performing your job is another. When
A
(/
,.
L-.
'<< ,
,:,~""
97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
you talk -- riding on an ambulance -- a
firefighter riding on an ambulance for three
months out of the year is not training. That's
work.
I believe that as far as training is
concerned, we need to train our people to those
particular levels, any level that they're capable
of learning. Train them to that level and let
them practice at that level, period.
I mean it's
that simple.
It's what we do with firefighters.
It's our -- our businesses aren't that dissimilar.
So if part of that training that you're
putting out there saying -- and we1re saying we
can't do or won1t do, if part of that training is
our people riding on your ambulances for three
months out of the year, that's not training.
Thatrs work. We're supplementing your work force
that way. That's wrong.
I think developing an actual training program
is doable, and having our in-house trainers
performing that so we don't put the burden on EMS.
CHIEF PAGE,
I would just
encourage you to read the articles that he's
reading off of and -- I mean, like Richmond,
Virginia, their ambulance association is an
16/ .~
98
1
accredited association. I think it's one of five
2
in the world.
3
(Inaudible) .
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE,
4
CHIEF PAGE, They have ALS
5
engines also there, but their protocol is limited.
6
They're limited with what equipment they have.
7
The only way they can maintain their certs is to
8
work eight hours a month on an EMS unit.
9
So I mean, other medical directors have these
10
same kind of requirements, but none of that1s done
11
here. I mean --
12
GAIL DOLAN, Do they have a
13
medical director?
14
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Yeah.
15
GAIL DOLAN, The fire
16
department has a medical --
17
CHIEF PAGE, Oh, no, no.
18
Therers one medical director in the county.
19
JIM MCEVOY, I can show you 15
20
articles that are going to tell you that
21
fire-based ALS delivery is the best way to do it.
22
Are you necessarily going to believe that?
23
GAIL DOLAN: So it's
24
totally --
25
JIM MCEVOY: Just because I give
'/; f
~'<c
A
6
99
1
you 15 articles to read on it, I mean, you can
2
read articles, pros and con, and all that stuff.
3
I mean, you know,
CHIEF PAGE:
4
we can talk all day. We do.
5
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, We're clearly, in
6
the section of board member discussion. And--
7
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Okay. Never
8
mind.
9
-- while I
not
JEFF ALLBRITTEN,
10
to be (inaudible) by the way, 11m on vacation
11
today. You can tell. This is very interesting.
12
I'm learning a great deal. But is there -- if we
13
wish to continue, we certainly can, but 11m not
14
sure where we're going in terms of resolving.
It
15
is interesting.
16
Yes, mar am.
17
I just have one
KATHLEEN MARR,
18
question for Chief Page.
19
Jeff, has there ever been any consideration
20
to tiering the level of fire/medic response, since
21
we can't get everyone the experience that they
22
need? So -- and your medical protocol is under
23
fire EM -- fire, medic response.
24
CHIEF PAGE: How do you mean?
25
I'm not sure I understood your question.
161
~
"
'')
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
100
KATHLEEN MARR, Based on your
level of experience. So you could have two
protocols for fire medic one, fire medic two based
on your level of experience. They could respond
to a higher level on scene.
CHIEF PAGE, Well--
KATHLEEN MARR, Like ladder.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Right.
CHIEF PAGE,
I think the ALS
engine, the way that he set it up, and you guys
correct me if I'm wrong on this part, but the ALS
engine med box is set up to where he feels that
they can reach in that protocol, the whole
protocol, and is geared toward that.
And I believe what he has said in the past
is, at the point you can show me that therels a
need for this bottom rung here, then we'll provide
it, if units are taking too long or whatever.
Now, as far as the 12 lead versus four lead
monitors, I think thatts more of a cost saving.
Why would you buy a $32,000 monitor if, in the
first five to ten minutes, you1ve got a four lead
that can defibrillate.
I mean, usually, that
diagnosis and that far into the protocol is doing
-- going -- or happening during the transport.
't/A L
V U
,~......
101
1
Not so much on scene.
2
So as far
I think, like Jim said, welre
3
very much further ahead than we were even two
4
years ago. And I think, as time marches on, as
5
this system gets bigger, because when we first
6
started and there was 40 employees, that was easy
7
to man and control. But when you get over to
8
Miami Dade and you've got thousands of employees,
9
your protocol starts to get a little bit more
10
controlled and you're asking for more permissions
11
because you canlt, obviously, keep track of all
12
these paramedics and get to know them as well as
13
the medical director.
14
So we -- back when we started, we had
15
different protocols level. We had a -- our own
16
paramedics were able to operate under the -- like
17
a substandard protocol, they could operate under,
18
start IVs, do things like that. Then there was a
19
more advanced protocol.
20
So we had two protocols in the past within
21
our own system, because back then, the day you got
22
your license, you're in the back of the truck with
23
an EMT, and youlre on your own. That's evolved
24
now to so much training and everything else now,
25
that -- I don't know.
I just -- you're saying you
A
/?
,"_.,~
16')
~
L ,;,
!..l!
102
1
need Oxytocin.
I don't know why you do, but I
2
mean
3
JIM MCEVOY,
I don't even know
4
what it is.
5
CHIEF PAGE,
I know, but why are
6
you fighting for it? If you don't -- I mean, I
7
know you're not a paramedic, but what 11m saying
8
is I think there's probably 11 drugs you guys
9
don't have.
Some of those, we have not used in a
10
whole quarter ourselves.
I mean, is there really
11
a need to have it just to say you have it?
12
JIM MCEVOY,
I think it's --
13
it's -- it's beneficial to everybody, all
14
stakeholders, if all the paramedics know what they
15
are, know how to use them.
(Inaudible)
16
CHIEF PAGE, And you know I'm
17
not opposed to that.
I mean
18
GAIL DOLAN,
See what I mean?
19
Those kind of things (inaudible).
20
CHIEF PAGE: Look, I'm not --
21
it's his license he's practicing -- I mean,
22
everybody is working under his license. My guys
23
are a little upset, the fact that fire guys get to
24
do more without or basically being credentialed
25
without having to go through FTOs and things like
1~1
{
"~
,
, .
103
1
that. And that's just part of it.
2
NANCY LASCHEID,
I don't think
3
that conversation really can go further without
4
him having the opportunity to address it.
I mean,
5
thatrs exactly where we were on October 30th.
6
Thatrs why we were here today. Unfortunately
7
JEFF ALLBRITTEN,
I think today has
8
been a good learning experience. Everybody had a
9
chance to be, you know, perhaps a little tense in
10
our debate, but I would, one, like to move on and
11
end this if possible, because I donlt think
12
(inaudible) .
13
Next meeting date, according to the schedule
14
that Jennifer shared with us, January 30th.
15
Thatrs to be voted on. We have to decide -- poor
16
Jennifer (inaudible).
17
JENNIFER FLORIN,
It was just
18
something that I put together. You can decide to
19
keep it that way. You can decide to move it.
20
Itrs whatever you guys want to do.
21
JEFF PANOZZO, Good.
Last few
22
(inaudible) the other one didn't work out.
So we
23
have to make an exact date (inaudible).
24
JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Trying to stick to
25
something like this is easier (end of audio.)
11.,
",..'
104
1
2
3
CERTIFICATE
4
5 State of Florida
6 County of Collier
7
8 I, JOYCE B. HOWELL, Notary Public in and for the
9 State of Florida at Large, certify that I transcribed
10 the foregoing proceedings from an audio CD, and that
11 the transcript and speaker identification is a true and
12 correct record of said proceedings to the best of my
13 ability.
14
15 I further certify that I am not a relative,
16 employee, attorney or counsel of any of the parties,
17 nor am I a relative or employee of any of the parties,
18 attorney or counsel connected with the action, nor am I
19 financially interested in the action.
20
21
Dated this 8th day of January, 2008.
22
23
24
Joyce B. Howell
Notary Public
State of Florida at Large
25
A
6
16."
t~ 17
-il,.. ,. '.'~
,:"~,,
."'t
f~
I, f
"'iala ~~.\\: \)\. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ADVISORY COUNCIL
'Halas ~L . --.-' (EMSAC)
H. enning-- .:fr.- 1--., SUB-COMMITTEE
coyle .. ';l - .'
Coletta ,~._._u. January 17,2008
COLLIER COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES HEADQUARTERS
2705 S Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104
District 1 Commission District - Victoria DiNardo, Present
District 4 Commission District - Nancy Lascheid, Vice Chairman, Present
City of Marco Island Fire/Rescue - Michael Murphy, Chief, Present
Physician's Regional Medical Center - Dr. Jeffrey Panozzo, Present
The regular meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Nancy Lascheid.
A quorum was present at this time.
NEW BUSINESS:
Nancy started off the meeting by asking that the Subcommittee agree on a mission
statement, and also identify three to five goals that they can work towards. She also
asked that we keep everyone's comments to two minutes each, so as to keep the meeting
flowing nicely. Chief Murphy stated that he felt concern that there are some things left
out of the Master Plan, and also has concern that the Productivity Committee will look at
this and have a completely different idea and direction than we would. Therefore it was
agreed that the mission would be to assess the Master Plan from each person's specialty
and background, and relate it strictly to EMS. It was also agreed that the following would
be the goals of the group: I. Feasibility; 2. Financial Aspect; and 3. Improvements. The
two concerns that stood out for Nancy in regard to the feasibility of the plan were the
population increase and expansion of a rural area. The aging population and
demographics would be a concern that falls under population increase. Nancy also stated
a concern that the plan didn't relate at all to was young families. Chief Murphy also
agreed brining up Ave Maria, which is a growing community for young families. Nancy
also referenced page 176 half way down on recommendations it states to "utilize the
facilities offered at Ave Maria." She stated that was the only place in the plan that
referenced Ave Maria at all. She also stated that Ave Maria would also fall under the
topic of expansion of rural areas. Chief Murphy also brought up the 1-75 corridor.
Nancy asked Chief Page about how many people annually were transported to the trauma
center. He stated that it is below 300, somewhere around 286, he thought. She stated that
it doesn't seem to be addressed in the plan; however we would have to anticipate a
trauma aspect. The situation on 1-4 recently was brought up, where there was a 70 car
pile-up. Chief Murphy stated that there are calls there everyday, even if they aren't
necessarily trauma. It was agreed that we do need to look at the trauma aspect also.
Dr Panozzo had a suggestion that we get a clear and concise idea of wllere we are Iv \ AU:>
heading as a group; then break to allow the members to really go throu~tlrgrrtWan and
Ollie:
Item#:
~CJ,:'~' tc
./
1 6 i .1'l ,?
...i ie,
i,'.i, ~",)
analyze it all. Then when we come back everyone will be more prepared to talk about the
goals of the group. He sug~ested meeting again as a subcommittee before the regular
EMSAC meeting on Jan. 30'. He stated that he wasn't sure he could go much further in
to the details of the plan without having an idea of where the group wants to end up in the
long run. He feels that if there is a target, then people will be able to give a more
meaningful opinion when we re-convene. He also wanted to add the analysis of the
Executive Summary of the plan into the mission statement of the group. It was agreed
upon that the Executive Summary at the beginning and the recommendations at the end
are the real contents of the plan, and everything in the middle is just back-up material.
Chief Murphy added that what the group could do would be to put their thoughts together
and submit them to Jennifer to distribute to the other subcommittee members. Then each
person would have a chance to review everyone's ideas and have a clear idea of what
they want to talk about at the next meeting. It was agreed that everyone come back with
something very detailed and in a timely manner. Chief Page stated that the difference
between the size of the plan and the size of the actual material presented to the
consultants was very significant. He stated that if any member would like some
additional information on anything in the plan to feel free to ask, and we would supply
that information. Nancy asked that a deadline be set of Tuesday the 22nd to get the
correspondence to Jennifer so she can distribute it out to the other subcommittee
members.
Moving on to the next goal of financial aspects, Nancy brought up what she
understood to be the three resources we currently have: User Fees, Ad Valorum taxes,
and Impact fees. She stated that she was worried about how vulnerable we are when it
comes to ad valorum taxes and impact fees with the way the economy is right now. Chief
Page explained that a perfect example is the growth units that were recommended in this
study, hasn't' been granted even this year. Nancy stated she thinks we need realistic with
the limitations of resources. She feels that we need to be frugal with the
recommendations due to the demands of funding. Dr Panozzo feels we shouldn't limit
our financial advice for other sources of revenue or other options of obtaining revenue.
Nancy felt that we should only look at sources that are realistic and not use our time to
propose something that is unrealistic. Chief Murphy added that we should add concerns
on limitations as a subcategory for the financial aspect. However we should try to think
of other funding sources. That maybe someone can come up with something that is
viable. Chief Murphy stated that what he thought was being said was that there are
limitations and the new tax structure will have a large impact. He felt that what he
thought Dr Panozzo was saying was that we still have to be concerned with the level of
service, however there is no money. He stated that a good example is Ave Maria, we
can't really be frugal and say that we don't think they should go there, we should try to
be creative and think of additional funding options for them. Or make a statement that
we feel it has to be funded. Another example we could use would be to say that trauma
needs to be looked at, and then let the financial people look at it from their point.
Finally the last goal is improvements. Chief Murphy stated that the
recommendations section states a few things that can be considered improvements. He
feels there were some components that were left out of the plan all together. The
example he gave was Port of the Isles; which was not mentioned at all. He requested
some general ideas on improvements. Nancy requested that in each person's statement to
16/ A 6
Jennifer that they identify three specific ideas on improvements. She requested to have it
limited to three to allow for time to discuss each. In recapping each goal she wanted to
be clear in that she didn't want the discussion on improvements to take us away from the
fact that we have an excellent program in place. She doesn't want to get tied up on things
that we got tied up on in the last meeting. Chief Murphy agreed that we need to look at
the big picture.
Nancy wanted to talk a minute about the trauma aspect. She stated that her
background is in trauma and she understands that 300 cases annually is not that many,
however it will increase over time. Chief Murphy stated that even though there are only
300, there are cases and calls everyday with car accidents or overturned vehicles. The
number of occurrences is very high. He feels that our aspect should be to bring it to the
table for discussion. He stated there was some talk about a station out there. He stated
that the risk factor is very high, and just because there are only 300 patients who meet the
criteria of trauma, there are still calls out there everyday. Nancy wanted to add preparing
for trauma to the improvements goal. Dr Panozzo also wanted to add pandemic and mass
casualty in with trauma. Nancy stated that she attended a presentation and had material at
home that she would bring with her on that.
Chief Page explained what he wanted to see come out of this. He stated that he
feels he knows where the Productivity Committee will stand on this, because he has dealt
with them in the past. Their main focus will be unit hour utilization, fiscal impact, such
as buying different types of transport vehicles. They are also going to look at system
status models versus what we currently provide. He asked that when the group goes
through these things he asked that they keep in mind the Productivity Committee will be
reviewing the financial aspects and also how we do business day to day. Examples might
be staffing levels and when and where they are staffed. He stated that the pandemic
aspect would maybe be better for the entire EMSAC body. Chief Murphy asked that
Chief Page draw up a few questions or "what ifs" that he feels the Productivity
Committee will bring up. Then we can use those questions as our fourth issue or goal to
go over. Chief Page thought that was a good idea because he identified some areas or
issues that they might come up with.
Chief Page asked Chief Murphy if he could share the letter that he wrote him after
the Master Plans were initially handed out. Chief Murphy stated that it was kind of an
overview letter and that he would have his secretary email it.
Chief Murphy asked Dr Panozzo that if he wanted anything added to his response
cards that he sends to all the patients to reference his hospital to email those to his
secretary.
Nancy asked Chief Page a question regarding the Executive Summary for the Fire
Consolidation report and when the meeting took place. Chief Page explained that the
report was a result of several meetings of the Operations Committee which none of the
Fire Chief's sat on. It was a meeting of other Chief's (Battalion Chief's, etc.) and this is
a result of what they would like to see in consolidation. Each Chief had to provide any
information that they requested. Also that report was going before the Fire Steering
Committee tonight.
Meeting Adjourned
161A 6
The next meeting will be held on January 28, 2008 at 2:00pm.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jennifer Florin
Breakdown
Mission:
To conduct a complete analysis of the Master Plan; focusing on the three goals
stated; which to include the Executive Summary and the Recommendations sections of
the Master Plan.
Goals:
1. Feasibility
a. Population Increase
-Aging population & Demographics
b. Expansion of rural areas
-Ave Maria
-1-75 Corridor
2. Financial Aspect
a. Concerns on limitations
b. Ideas for additional funding sources
3. Improvements
a. General Concepts
b. preparing for Trauma
c. Utilization
d. New/Left out Sites
4. Productivity Ouestions from Chief Page
/ ':f'" 'V
Date Adopted: -;/") . - C ?J
(. /
~. //', '/ .
~ />''':r' / 7, A'~ / /
/ :8'r/!~ff/
Vice/-3j.rriian /Cmirfcil MemberSignature
/
,
Fia;a' .._.~ W.~._. ___.
Halasn..;. ----
Henning_ ---r_
coyleJ7f . .---
Coletta .. ---~--
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCil
16~1 A
7
AGENDA
(Revised Dec. 28, 2007)
Monday, January 7, 2008
9:00 A.M.
Commission Boardroom
W. Harmon Turner Building (Building "F") - Third Floor
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Approval of Agenda
IV. Approval of November 7, 2006 meeting minutes
V. Upcoming Environmental Advisory Council Absences
VI. land Use Petitions
A. Planned Unit Development PUDZ.2006.AR.9143
Standing Oaks RPUD
Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East
B. Plat and Construction Plans PPl-2006-AR-9975
Mockingbird Crossing
Section 36, Township 48 South, Range 26 East
VII. New Business
lDC amendment for Special Cycle 2008-1 a
(Florida Rock Industries, Inc.)
I. Old Business
A. Update members on projects
II. Subcommittee Reports
III. Staff Comments
A. Ethics: Conflict of Interest - Jeff Wright
B. Rem inder - Check with staff before amending agenda and vote is needed to amend agenda
C. RlSA presentation in November is 3-4 hours. Schedule a full day at a regular meeting or
have a special session?
IV.
Council Member Comments
A. Water Use - Richard Miller
Misc. Com!s I ~ I It 1
Date:
V.
Public Comments
:tem#
VI. Adjournment
*******************************************************************
Council Members: Please notifv Summer Araaue. Environmental Services Senior Environmental
Scecialist no later than 5:00 C.m. on Januarv 2. 2008 if you cannot attend this meetina or if yOU
have a conflict and will abstain from votina on a cetition (530-6290\.
General Public: Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the
proceedings pertaining thereto; and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of proceedings is
made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
j
16/
.il
.)\
n
'7
J
Text underlined is new text to be added.
T81:1 stril,stRf9iJijR ie: SImeR! t8Xt t8 99 gelated.
Bold text indicates a defined term
LDC Amendment Rellnest
ORIGIN: Florida Rock Industries, Inc. Private Petition
AUTHOR: Doug Lewis and Bruce Anderson in Consultation with County Staff.
DEPARTMENT:
Transportation Division.
AMENDMENT CYCLE: 2008 Special Cycle la
LDC PAGE: LDC1:5-6
LDC SECTION(S): 1.04.04 Reduction of Required Site Design Requirements
CHANGE: Add that reduction of minimum size, dimension or area of existing yards, lots or parcels is
prohibited except where a portion thereof is being acquired for a present or planned public use andlor
purpose by the County or another governmental entity or by a private party under an agreement with the
County or other governmental entity. This exception already exists in LDC for acquisitions and
condemnation by government or dedication to government The amendment merely adds that the
exception also applies where a private party is acting on behalf of government. The amendment also
provides that such reduction shall not effect the eligibility of the lot or parcel to sever Transfer of
Development Rights (TDR) Credits where the reduction occurs as a result of acquisition for a present or
planned public use andlor purpose by the County or another governmental entity or by a private party
under an agreement with the County or another governmental entity.
REASON: To encourage property owners to sell for purposes of public right of way, their lands for
the southern and western portions of the Wilson Boulevard Extension depicted in the North Belle Meade
Overlay of the Growth Management Plan. The purpose is to leave owners of Rural Fringe Sending Lands
in the same legal position after an acquisition, of their lot or parcel for a public use and/or purpose, as the
lands were prior to the acquisition.
FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS: This will significantly reduce the costs of acquisition of
rights of way for a public use andlor purpose within Rural Fringe Sending Lands, because the County will
only be paying for the land not for severance damages for TDRs that could no longer be severed from
such lots or parcels because of the reduction in size as a result of the acquisition by or on behalf of the
County.
RELATED CODES OR REGULATIONS: Subsection 2.03.07 D. 4. Transfer of Development
Rights (TOR).
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT: None.
OTHER NOTESNERSION DATE:
December 20, 2007
Amend the LDC as follows:
1.04.04 Reduction of Required Site Design Requirements
1
C:\Documents and Settings\mendicino ~ c\Desktop\NAPLES-#543514-v1-LDC _Amendment_ Request~ 122007 .DOC
16/ A ?
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Text l;;tr:iketl:II:Sblri!lR;E CblIT9r:1t fe-xl tg 139 9slstBfl.
Bold text indicates a defined term
A. No part of a required yard, required open space, required off-street parking
space, or required off-street loading space, provided in connection with one
building, structure, or use shall be included as meeting the requirements for any
other, structure, or use, except where specific provision is made in this LDC.
B. Minimum standards; nonconformities created by public acquisition.
1. All lots or yards created after the effective date of this Code [Feb. 14,
2006] must comply with the requirements then established by this Code.
2. No lot, even though it may consist of one or more abutting lots of record,
or yard, existing at the effective date of this Code [Feb. 14, 2006J or
lawfully existing on the effective date [Feb. 14, 2006J of applicable
amendments to this Code shall thereafter be reduced in its degree of
compliance, including its size, dimension, or area, below the minimum
requirements then set forth in this Code, except by reason of a portion
thereof being acquired for present or planned public use and/or purpose
by Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by a private party
under an aqreement with Collier County or another qovernmental entity in
any manner, including dedication, condemnation, purchase, and the like.
a. Required yards on improved lots , lot area, lot coverage on
improved lots, and lot dimensions rendered nonconforming
or more legally nonconforming as a result of being acquired faf
public ~se, by Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by
a private party under an aqreement with Collier County or another
qovernmental entity may be reduced by the same dimension,
area, or amount invoived in the dedication, condemnation,
purchase, or similar method of acquisition fur p~blic ~se, but shall
not result in a front yard of less than ten feet (10') in depth.
Accordingly, the resulting degree of nonconformity of the area
and dimensions of a lot and the required yards with this Code's
then current requirements will be deemed lawful unless or until the
remaining lot or yard is recreated, typically by re-development,
re-piat or lot re-combination, at which time such lots and
yards must comply with the requirements then established by this
Code. Further, no conforming lot otherwise qualifying for a lot
split or lot line adjustment pursuant to Section 10.02.02. B.8;
10.02.02, B.12, 1.04.04 or 9.03.03.A 5 may be denied such
approval solely on the grounds that the resulting lot or lots
would be less than the required minimum area for such lot(s) in
the applicable zoning district as a resuit of acquisition, from Feb.
14, 2006.
b. Other existing site related legal nonconformities, including those
rendered more nonconforming as a result of acquisition-fGf
p~l3lic ~S8 by Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by
a private party under an aqreement with Collier County or another
qovernmental entity and which pertain to this Code's or other
county code requirements, such as, but not limited to, stormwater
2
C:\Documents and Settings\mendicino _ c\Desktop\NAPLES.#543514-v1-LDC _Amendment_ Request_ 122007 .DOC
... f. ~ /i1
.1L tJ! Ii
-"
('
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Text Etriksthrswgl:l i& G\.IrrSAt text 19 139 deleted.
Bold text indicates a defined term
management, landscaping or buffers, preserves, on- or off-site
parking, architectural design standards, etc., will be deemed
legally nonconforming ,and all such resulting nonconformities
may be allowed to remain so nonconforming , unless or untii
the remaining lot or yard is subsequently re-created or re-
developed, at which time such site related nonconformities and
development must comply with the then existing requirements of
this Code.
c. In those circumstances where acquisition for p~I3IiG ~S8 by Collier
County or another oovernmental entity or by a private party under
an aoreement with Collier County or another qovernmental entity
of a portion of a lot or yard would result in one or more
nonconformities that would require approvai of a development
order or permit in order to implement the terms of the acquisition,
i.e., in order to cure or remedy the effect of an acquisition, (e.g.,
an SOP or building permit required to relocate a prior existing
building ), the County manager, or designee, is authorized to
approve such development order or permit so long as any prior
existing legal nonconformity of the type set forth in b. above
would not be increased.
d. A leqal non-conforminq lot or parcel of less than five (5) acres
that was in existence as of June 22. 1999 which is reduced in size
or rendered more non-conforminq as a result of a portion thereof
beinq acquired bY Collier County or another oovernmental entity
or by a private party under an aoreement with Collier County or
another qovernmental entity, may be leoally reduced by the same
dimension. area. or amount involved in the dedication.
condemnation. purchase or similar method of acquisition by
Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by a private party
under an aqreement with Collier County or another qovernmental
entity and the resultinq lot(s) or parcel(s) not acouired by Collier
County or another qovernmental entity or by a private party under
an aoreement with Collier County or another oovernmental entity
shall be deemed a leqally non-confirminq iot or parcel of less than
five (5) acres entitled to severance of base and bonus TOR credits
at a rate of 1 TOR credit per leqal non-conforminq lot or parcel
pursuant to Section 2.03.07 O. 4. of the LOC. A lot or parcel five
(5) acres or larqer which is reduced in size as a result of a portion
thereof beinq acquired by Collier County or another qovernmental
entity or by a private party under an aqreement with Collier County
or another qovernmental entity. may be leoally reduced by the
same dimension. area. or amount invoived in the dedication.
condemnation. purchase or simiiar method of acouisition by
Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by a private party
under an aqreement with Collier County or another oovernmental
entity and the number of base and bonus TOR credits oenerated
from such resultino lot(s) or parcel(s) not acquired by Collier
County or another qovernmental entity or by a private party under
an aoreement with Collier County or another qovernmental entity
shall be calculated pursuant to Section 2.03.07 O. 4. of the LOC
3
C:\Documents and Settings\mendicino ~ c\Desktop\NAPLES-#543514-v1-LDC _ Amendment_RequesC 122007 .DOC
16/ A ?
based on the lot or parcel
dedication. condemnation.
acquisition.
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Text driketl:II:S6I8R i& GblFr9F1t text t9 be geleted.
Bold text indicates a defined term
acreaqe which existed prior to the
purchase or similar method of
3. This section may be applied to those acquisitions occurring prior to the
adoption of this ordinance so long as the purchase or dedication of the
property has not closed, or the condemnation proceeding relating to the
property acquired has not reached final disposition.
C. Other than provided for immediately above, required off-street parking shall not
be reduced in area or changed to any other use unless the permitted or
permissible use that it serves is discontinued or modified, or equivalent required
off-street parking is provided meeting the requirements of this LOC.
4
C:\Documents and Settings\mendicino _ c\Desktop\NAPLES-#543514-v1-LDC _ AmendmenC Request_ 122007. DOC
~
Fiala .-' -.--
Halas '~1t--
Hennlng17t:~--..
Coyle -]~ --
Coletta-+- .-----
16/ A .&
October 30,2007
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
FIRE REVIEW TASK FORCE
Naples, Florida, October 30, 2007
RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 2008
Board or County C:ommissioners
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Fire Review Task
Force, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein,
Met on this date at 1:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier
County Community Development and Environmental Services Division
Conference Room #609/610, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida,
With the following members present:
CHAIRMAN: Bradley Schiffer
VICE CHAIRMAN: William Varian
Gary Beaumont
James Boughton
Dalas Disney
J. Christopher Lombardo
William Schreck
Chuck McMahon(Excused)
Angela Davis(Excused)
STAFF PRESENT: Bob Dunn - Interim Building Official
Jeff Wright - Assistant County Attorney
Ed Riley - Fire Code Official
Ricco Longo - Deputy Fire Code Official
Paula Brethauer - Operations Analyst
Bob Salvaggio - Fire Code Official
Jeremy Johnson - Deputy Fire Code Offici~. c I', I A g
k. d I . d ffi ISC. orres L(
Jac Ie e a Osa - Deputy Fire Co e 0 Icia
Paul Mattausch - Director, Utilities Dept. Date
Item#:
'=G~;es to
J
16/
October 30, 24
8
I. Call Meeting to Order
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bradley Schiffer at 1:01 P,M.
II. Roll Call
Roll Call was taken with a quorum established.
III. Approval ofthe Agenda
There were no changes to the agenda.
IV. Approval of Minutes
A. Review Methods
Sue Chapin of Mancan appeared before the Task Force and provided a
summary of Roberts Rules of Order including procedures for calling meetings
to order, quorums, motions, minutes, etc. A Mancan document entitled
"Collier County Advisory Board Meetings, Summary of Roberts Rules of
Order Presentation" dated 2006 was submitted to the Task Force for future
reference.
Mr. Lombardo arrived at 1:20 PM.
B. September 28, 2007
Mr. Beaumont moved to approve the minutes of the September 28, 2007
meeting subject to the following corrections.
Page 2, Old Business, Fire Flow Comments, line I , Mr. Holt to "Mr. Holt's
Staff'.
Second by Mr. Disney. Carried unanimously7-0.
C. October 8, 2007
Mr. Schreck moved to approve the minutes of the October 8,2007 meeting.
Second by Mr. Disney. Carried unanimously 7-0.
V. Old Business Comments (topics will be reviewed at future meetings)
A. Water Supply
None
B. Alarm Systems & Monitoring
Mr. Beaumont noted the requirement to obtain a permit and inspection for
replacing items in existing systems is time consuming and costly for the
owner.
Mr. Riley stated that if the same make and model item is used in the
replacement no permit is required and is categorized as "maintenance".
Different make and model replacement components require review to ensure
compliance with the existing system,
Mr. Disney noted that proyiding a published list of acceptable cross
referenced components for replacement items would be a possible solution to
the issue.
2
16) A 8
Octobcr 30, 2007
Mr. Riley notcd this may be acceptable ifit is not a power consuming
dcvice. Hc is looking at ways to streamline this process.
C. Permit Process
Mr. Schreck submitted draft flow charts entitled "Collier County Permit
Proccss" including the "original flow chart", "suggcsted rcvised flow" and
"correction or reyision flow" for review by the Task Force and Staff
Mr. Boughton requested clarification regarding permission to categorize
building construction type's one category for building code reviews and
another category for fire flow reviews.
Mr. Schiffer noted that the building needs to be categorized as one
construction type throughout the review process.
Mr. Dunn stated that Staff has terminated the requirement for a letter of
explanation for "not applicable" checklist items.
VI. New Business
A. Florida Administrative Code 61G15.32 Process
Mr. Schiffer submitted Section 6] G15.30 and 61 G 15.32 of the Florida
Administratiye Code to thc Task Force for reyiew.
B. Fire Sprinklers Submittal/Review Process
Jeremy Johnson and Jackie de la Osa submitted the 61G-15 Submittal
Requirements - Sprinklers checklist for review by the Task Force.
Ms. de la Osa noted that the chccklist is a synopsis of the requirements of
Section 61 G 15-32.003 "Common Requirements to All Fire Protection
Engineering Documents." The following was noted;
· The quality of information submitted with the initial submittal is poor,
including checklist items missing, technical data omissions, missing or
outdated flow tests rcsults, etc.
· The flow tests are required to be conducted within 6 months of the
submittal date of the application which has been established as a
Department policy to ensurc accurate flow tests rcsults as requircd
under the "Utility Standards Manual" updated 2006.
· In accordance with NFP A 13, the application review requires an actual
flow test result as opposed to a computer modcl result.
Break 2:35 P.M.
Re-convene 2:50 P.M.
A discussion occurred regarding the submittal requirements for structural
support and structural openings required undcr Section 61G-]532.003-(5)
(number 3 of the checklist).
Mr. Riley noted that he would review these requirements as they apply to pre-
engineered structures vs. indiyidually designed structures.
3
~Q"" ,A 0
I '+
, oj
ber 30, 200~
Ms. de la Osa noted that in general the applications for sprinkler systems do
not hold up the overall permit issuance. In addition, "material deviations"
(layout documents or "shop drawings" that are different from the 61G-15
submittal) issues are not a large problem with sprinkler system applications.
Mr. Beaumont noted that the extensive information required by the Fire
Alarm 61G-15 submittal may be causing the "material deviation" issues with
the shop drawings submitted with the Fire Alarm permit application.
Mr. Longo noted that the actual requirements for Fire Alarm submittals are
outlined in 6IG-15.33.006.
C. Inspections
Continued to the next agenda.
D. Revisions
Continued to the next agenda.
VII. Public Comments
James Ditaranto of Commercial Electrical Systems appeared before the Task Force
and expressed concerns over the oyerall Fire Code permit process in Collier County
and lack of continuity between the Building Department and Fire Code Review.
Numerous times the building is nearly completed before the 61 G submittal is
approved. In most cases the Fire Alarm Contractors are not involved until the end of
the permit/construction phase as opposed to the beginning and this creates "material
deviation" issues in shop drawing submittals. For project estimates in Collier County
he allows for 40% of the overall bid cost for permit approvals, in other Counties he
allows 2%. Many Contractors are no longer working in this County due to these
factors. With regard to Fire Alarm permits, other Counties do not have an extensive
checklist and general building permits are not issued until6lG's are approved.
Requirements of 61 G submittals requirements are a matter of interpretation and are
different in the yarious Counties.
Mr. Boughton inquired how projects are allowed to initiate construction before
issuance of building permits.
Mr. Riley stated in the past, buildings have been started under "early start letters" or
"phase permits" which allows initiation of construction without complete permit
approval. He further noted Staff is reviewing ways to improve the Fire Alarm permit
process.
Mr. Schiffer noted a possible solution to document conflicts between the two
submittals (61 G and the subsequent shop drawing for specialty permits) is not
requiring drawings for the 61 G submittal.
Mr. Longo stated that the 61 G-15.33.006 requires drawings for some of the items
listed. If feasible, he would be in favor of one application submittal process.
Mr. Lombardo lef! the meeting at 3:50 P.M.
4
16 I oct1er 30~007
Mr. Dunn stated that the recent policy for the Building Department is not allowing
issuance of any commercial permits without the Fire Department approval. This
includes "early work permits". All Fire Alarm fees go to the Fire Department.
Mr. Disney left the meeting at 4:0(} P.M.
VIII. Review of available dates and topics for future meetings for November,
December and January
Mr. Shiffer stated the Committee Strategy will be fact-finding meetings for the
remainder of the calendar year and review the local Ordinance in January.
The next meeting will be November 30th, I ;00 P.M. The December meeting is
scheduled for December 14, I ;00 P.M. The January meeting is scheduled for January
18th 1 ;00 P.M.
A quorum was lost at 4: 18 P.M.
Assistant County Attorney Jeff Wright noted the Committee may hear speakers with
discussion; however no oflicial action can be taken.
Speakers
Louis Roderiquez of Coastal Fire Protections noted that the Staff consider the "material
deviations" be handled in letter format as opposed to drawing revisions.
Bob Dimodica of Naples Fire Sprinkler stated that the Task Force should review the
permit fee requirements for sprinkler installations and there needs to be a continuity of
inspection procedures within the County.
Michael Vidal of West Coast Fire Protection stated many of the problems of submittals
and "material deyiations," etc. is caused by consultants not familiar with the process of
submitting applications.
There being no further business for the good ofthe County, the meeting was
adjourned by order of the chair at 4:40 P.M.
Collier Coun Fire Review Task Force
~
Bradley Schi er, Chairman
These minutes app;:oved by the Board/Committee on
as presented V or as amended ..
5
16'"./ A n
it><{
November 30, 2007''?
Fiala
Hcdqs
He"
COyiE
Coletta
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Fire Review 1?fs'ltfCountycornmissloners
OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
FIRE REVIEW TASK FORCE
-
Naples, Florida, November 30, 2007
RECE!VED
IAN 2 2 2008
Force, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein,
Met on this date at I :00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier
County Community Development Environmental Services
Conference Room #609/610,2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida,
With the following members present:
CHAIRMAN: Bradley Schiffer
VICE CHAIRMAN: William Varian
Gary Beaumont
James Boughton
Dalas Disney (absent)
J. Christopher Lombardo (absent)
William Schreck
Chuck McMahon
Angela Davis
OTHERS PRESENT: Bob Dunn, Acting Building Official
Jeff Wright, Assistant County Attorney
Ed Riley, Fire Code Official
Ricco Longo, Deputy Fire Code Official
Paula Brethauer, Operations Analyst
Nick Biondo, East Naples Fire Marshal
Bob Salvaggio, Fire Code Official
Karl Reynolds, North Naples Fire Dept.
Tom Cannon, East Naples Fire District
Commissioner
Jackie de la Osa, Deputy Fire Code Official (j
Joyceanna J. Rautio, Facilitator Fire S~bC&n-es lee, \ fr ()
Steering Committee
Date:
item#:
r:c?ie,; tcJ'
J
161
'I
I-~
8
Noyember 30,2007
I. Call Meeting to Order
The meeting was called to order at I ;04 PM by Chairman Schiffer.
II. Roll Call
Roll call was taken and a quorum was established.
III. Approval of Agenda
Mr. Varian moved to approve the agenda. Second by Mr. Schreck. Carried
unanimously 6-0.
IV. Approval of Minutes
A. October 30, 2007
Mr. Varian moved to approve the minutes of the October 30,2007 meeting
subject to the following changes:
Page 2, V. "topics will be reviewed at future meetings" to "topics at past
meetings. "
Carried unanimously 6-0.
V. Old Business (topics from past meetings)
A. Water Supply
Water flow study to be reviewed under VI. D
B. Alarm Systems and Monitoring
Ricco Longo, Deputy Fire Code Official submitted a document outlining
the changes in the Florida Administrative Code Section 61 G 15-32.001 _
32.003 General Responsibility providing requirements for Engineered
Drawings for Fire Alarm Application requirements.
C. Permit Process
None.
D. Florida Administrative Code 61G15.32 Process
None.
E. Fire Sprinklers
None.
VI. New Business
A. Fire Sprinkler Inspections
No concerns were brought forth in this area.
B. Fire Sprinkler Revisions
No concerns were brought forth in this area.
C. Building Official and Fire Official areas of Governing Code review.
Chairman Shiffer asked if there are areas where the Goyerning Codes
conflict in requirements and if there are redundant reviews of applications.
He cited Section 4611 of the Fire Prevention Code which addresses
conflicts in Codes and resolutions.
Ed Riley, Fire Code Official noted there are areas of overlap in the Life
Safety Codes and Building Codes and if necessary there is an avenue of
resolution. To date it has not created a large problem for permit issuances.
2
161~1f "8
November 30,2007
Mr. McMahon joined the meeting at I: 15 PM
Mr. Schreck asked ifthere is a way that the Fire Department plan reyiew
and Building Code plan review could be conducted simultaneously as
opposed to the Building Department having 20 days to review, then the
Fire Department having 20 days to review.
Bill Dunn stated he has been working on this for 7 months, attempting to
combine the 20-day requirement for both jurisdictions and has recently re-
started this procedure and it is working well to date.
Ed Riley noted that this is the requirement in the Fire District, Collier
County inter-local agreement; however, this procedure was previously
halted by Tom Hammond.
SPEAKERS
James Ditaranto of Commercial Electrical Services, addressed the Task Force
noting that it is a problem when the General Building Permit is issued first, then at
a later date the Fire Alarm permits are applied for and issued. He recommended
that Fire Alarm Permits be issued in conjunction with the General Building
Permit.
Chairman Schiffer noted that the current process is for a 61 G application to be
submitted with related Fire Alarm documents as required under 61G, then if the
61 G is approved the Building Permit is issued. It is the responsibility of the Fire
Code Otlice to review the 61 G submittal for Fire Code Compliance. Subsequent
to this, the applicant is required to apply for a separate Fire Alarm Permit,
Sprinkler Permits, etc. accompanied by "shop drawings" that must match the 61G
approyal.
Mr. Schreck noted that the "shop drawings" for Fire Alarm applications are
generally created by the Fire Alarm Contractor who has a better working
knowledge of systems creating a conflict with the original 61 G drawing requiring
the applicant to seek one of the 4 processes of approval for a Material Deyiation.
Ifboth permit applications were reviewed simultaneously it may help alleyiate
these Material Deviations.
A general discussion occurred in how other jurisdictions interpret the 61 G
requirements (information, plan detail, etc.) and the timing of issuance of
Building Permits, Fire Alarm Permits and related certifications by Engineers.
Ed Riley requested citing specific examples of other jurisdiction's procedures for
him to review; he is not aware of any jurisdictions that issue a permit on a 61G
documents without working drawings. Further, all jurisdictions he is aware of
issue separate Building and Fire Alarm permits.
Tom Stasko, of Fire 1, noted that in his interpretation the 61G drawings are a
guideline for the projects design, not a detailed construction plan intended for
specialty permits.
3
16 J A 8
Noyember 30,2007
Mr. McMahon suggested requiring issuance of the Fire Alarm Permit before the
Framing Inspection.
Tom Cannon, Chairman of the East Naples Fire Control and Rescue District
stated that the District is the Administrator of the Fire Code Officials Office. He
further stated that by a unanimous vote of both the East Naples Fire Control
District and the Steering Committee effective January 1,2008 terminated the
unwritten inter-local agreement with the County as far as the Fire Code Office
reviewing 6IG's. It will now be the responsibility of the Building Department.
Ed Riley stated that the Fire Code Office will issue permits for Fire Alarm and
Sprinkler systems with reviews limited to the shop drawings compliance with Fire
and Life Safety Codes, not conformance with the 61 G submittal. This was the
procedure prior to 200 I but was changed to the current process at the request of
the building industry. He recommended a procedure where Specialty Permits
applications and supporting plans (Fire Alarm, Sprinkler, etc.) are submitted with
the 6 I G application and all permits be issued simultaneously. He further noted
that the problem lies with the coordination of the owners, consultants and
contractors in processing pennits. He will work to provide a smooth transition to
the Building Department.
Bob Dunn stated he was not aware of this decision and will set up a team
immediately to address this transition.
James Ditaranto of Commercial Electric Services raised questions regarding "as
built" Fire Alarm drawings he proyides to field inspectors previous to inspections.
Ed Riley recommended Mr. Ditaranto appear before the Fire Alarm Sub-
Committee to resolye any questions regarding these issues.
Break - 2:35PM
Re-Convene - 2:55PM
D. Fire Flow Studies
Chairman Schiffer provided the results of the Fire Flow study conducted
by himself and Mr. Riley which analyzed fire flow requirements for
buildings utilizing the Collier County method, the Insurance Service
Organization (ISO) Method and the NFPA appendix H method. The
Philadelphia Baptist Church, Uno Chicago Grill, Collier County Parking
Garage, Golden Gate Auto Zone and Waterside Parking Structure were
used in the study. It was noted that consultants do not uniformly or
correctly categorize building construction types and this should be
addressed in the Standardized Plan Requirements.
In general the Collier County flow requirements were less stringent than
the ISO method, but more stringent than NFP A appendix H. It was noted
that the ISO requirements do not provide for a sprinkler reduction factor;
Collier County allows a 50 percent reduction in flows for buildings with
sprinklers; NFP A allows for up to a 75 percent reduction in flows for
buildings with sprinklers.
4
161 A 8
November 30, 2007
A discussion occurred on why parking garages haye similar flow
requirements as office buildings, etc.
Karl Reynolds of North Naples Fire Department stated that the flow
requirements are similar as vehicles in parking structures contain a mass
of combustible materials as well as combustible fuel which may cause
extensive damage to structures or threaten life safety. Further, they may
be adjacent to existing structures.
Nick Biondo East Naples Fire District requested clarification of the goal
of the study. He noted that the flow requirements of Collier County were
previously studied and the process to formulate the standards received
input from Steering Committees, District Fire Chiet's, Fire Marshall's,
etc. and wanted to ensure this was brought back up in front of the Task
Force before any recommendations were made in this area. He also stated
he has a concern with the flow pressures provided to the system by the
Utilities Department.
Mr. Varian noted that the larger problem possibly originates in the flows
that are provided by the Utilities Department and this should be addressed.
Chairman Schiffer noted the submission of an email document regarding
the fee structures in different County's. This document was sent
anonymously.
Ed Riley questioned the accuracy ofthe figures provided in the document.
A discussion occurred whether reyiewing an anonymous authored
document was appropriate. It was noted that the author was anonymous,
as he "feared retaliation for himself or his business."
Tom Cannon, Chairman, East Naples Fire Control and Rescue District
stated that there is no retaliation, and if this is found, appropriate employee
disciplinary actions would be taken. He follows up on all complaints he
receIves.
Mr. Beaumont noted that the subject of "retaliation" was not included in
the resolution adopted by the Board of County Commissioners.
Joyceanna J. Rautio, Facilitator of the Fire Service Steering Committee
and an Underground Service Contractor addressed the Task Force. She
stated that while working in the private sector she had heard of this issue
and requested documentation from any contractors in the priyate sector but
could never substantiate a claim to be brought forward to the Fire District.
Further, it is not part of the Task Force Resolution. She also noted the
Task Force should focus on the Utilities Departments delivery of flow
pressures as this issue needs to be investigated and addressed.
VII. Public Comments
None
5
16 t~YembB30, 2007
VIII. Review offuture meetings/topics
A. Friday, December 14,2007 IPM - SPM
· Design Professional interface with Fire Official Otlice
· General and Sub-Contractors interface with Fire Otlicial Office
. Fire Districts
B. Friday, January 18,2008 IPM - SPM
. Permit process
· Collier Local Amendments to the Florida Fire Prevention Code
C. Friday, February 1,2008 IPM - SPM
. Roundtable Discussions
D. Friday, February 8, 2008 IPM - SPM
. Roundtable Discussions
. Establish Report Method
E. Friday, February IS, 2008 IPM - SPM
. Roundtable Discussions
. Review Report Draft
F. Friday, February 22, 2008 IPM - SPM
. Roundtable Discussions
. Review Report Draft
G. Friday February 29, 2008 IPM - SPM
. Review Final Report Draft
H. Tuesday, March 18,2008 9AM - Noon
. BCC/Fire Review Task Force Workshop
There being no further business for the good of the ounty, the meeting was
adjourned by order ofthe chair at 4:19 P.M.
Collier Cou ty Fire Review Task Force
,-'.
Bradley Scll ffer, Chairman
These minutes approved by the Board/Committee 0
Id\I~/Dr
6
as presented
or as amended
~.
7
I 6love4er 38007
./ Ii. (y.Sf'"
Flala\.t T.J.>-
~: ~~~jng~~~.....~ .::~~==::
Coyle .f-~~.
Coletta. .... ... .
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
FIRE REVIEW TASK FORCE
r;-
161 A
8
December 14,2007
Naples, Florida, December 14,2007
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Fire Review Task
Force, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein,
met on this date at 1 :00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier
County Community Development Environmental Services
Conference Room #609/610,2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida,
with the following members present:
CHAIRMAN: Bradley Schiffer
VICE CHAIRMAN: William Varian
Gary Beaumont
James Boughton (excused)
Da1as Disney
J. Christopher Lombardo
William Schreck
Chuck McMahon
Angela Davis (absent)
ALSO PRESENT: Joe Schmitt, Administrator, CDES
Bob Dunn, Acting Building Official
Jeff Wright, Assistant County Attorney
Paula Brethauer, Operations Analyst
MISC. eorres:
r~ \ A ~
Date;
''''I''ll ~
-/
16 J A 8
December 14, 2007
I. Call Meeting to Order
The meeting was called to order at I ;03 PM by Chairman Schiffer.
II. Roll Call
Roll Call was taken and a quorum established.
The following Fire Department Personnel Representatives were present: Ed Riley,
Fire Code Official; Ricco Longo, Deputv Fire Code Official; Nick Biondo. East
Naples Fire Marshal; Bob Salvaggio, Fire Code Official; Bill Sylvester, Golden Gate
Fire Marshal; Jackie D' la Osa. Deputv Fire Code Official; Karl Reynolds, North
Naples Fire Dept.; Dave Robb, North Naples Fire Dept.; Leo Rodgers, Immokalee
Fire Marshal and Michael Brown, North Naples Fire Chief
III. Approval of Agenda
Mr. Varian moved to approve the agenda. Second by Mr. Disney. Carried
unanimously 5-0.
IV. Approval of Minutes
A. November 30, 2007
Mr. Schreck moved to approve the minutes subject to the following changes:
Page 3, paragraph 2, line 10, Tom Hammond to "Bill Hammond."
Page 5, paragraph 6, line I, Joyce Rautio to "Joyceanna J. Rautio"
Second by Mr. Varian. Carried unanimously 5-0.
V. Old Business Comments: (topics from past meetings)
A. Water Supply
None
Mr. Lombardo arrived at 1:06 PM
B. Alarm Systems & Monitoring
Mr. Beaumont noted some contractors are concerned with checklist and
application requirements in changing out devices. Also, a disparity in the fees
between Electrical inspections conducted by the County ($75 per floor for high
rises) and Fire Alarm inspections conducted by the Fire District ($300 per floor
high rises).
Ed Riley noted that the Fire Alarm inspection fees were developed by a Fire
District analysis as the Statute enables the Fire District to recover the associated
costs in proyiding inspections.
Bob Dunn is completing a study on the various inspection fees and will submit
the report to the Task Force.
C. Permit Process
None
D. Florida Administrative Code 61G15.32
2
ie€mtr f:, 200?
Bob Dunn reported the transition for reviewing Fire Alarms and Sprinklers
Systems Compliance with 61 G submittal requirements is going well. It was
noted that the submittal process remains the same; the change is in the review
responsibilities. As an example, the comparison of 61 G compliance with shop
drawings will be conducted by the Building Department.
It was also noted that the new proposed requirements for Fire Alarm systems
make the interpretation ofrequirements for submittals of 61 G applications more
uniform throughout the State of Florida.
Mr. McMahan arrived at J:20 PM
Ricco Longo stated the new proposal makes the requirements more clear, and
the items listed in the proposal were always required. The Collier County
submittal requirements were based on determinations he receiyed from the
Board of Prolessional Engineers and were received verbally or with email
responses on requests for handling specific situations and the intent of
requirements.
It was noted that the re-write is an indication that these items were always
intended to be part of a submittal.
Chairman Schiffer requested a copy of the Declaratory Statement regarding
this issue.
A discussion ensued on the requirements for the Shop Drawing submittal.
Ed Riley stated that Shop Drawings submittals will be required to proyide all
necessary information sufficient to verify that the design is Code compliant and
provide specifications for the installation of the system.
F. Fire Sprinklers
None
G. Building Official and Fire Official of Governing Codes for Review
None
VI. New Business
A. Design Professional interface with Fire Official Office
None
B. General & Sub Contractors interface with the Fire Official Office
None
C. Fire Districts
Bob Salvaggio, Fire Code Official submitted a white binder handout to the
Task Force in response to issues and concerns raised during the past
meetings of the Task Force. Among other items, the response outlined 4
areas of concerns.
3
l~IA€
December ]4, 2007
]. Public perception that the Fire Districts reyiew of applications are
"holding up" the issuance of permits and the permit process. He
provided time frames of applications noting the Consultant controlled
the application substantially more than the Fire District. Among
specific examples were the Philadelphia Baptist Church where it took
the Fire District 10 working days to review the application and took
the Architect 82 working days to re-submit the correction; the County
Parking Garage where the Architect held the Application 85% of the
time while the Fire District controlled it 15% of the time from original
submittal to permit issuance.
2. Building Department Policies regarding responsibilities in application
review and inspections of projects submitted by Private Providers. He
specifically noted times when the Fire District's Review of a Specialty
Permit Application has noted items of non-compliance with the
Building Code and notified the Building Department but the items
have not been addressed.
Joe Schmitt, Administrator of Community Services and Deve]opment
stated that the County has no intentions of reviewing plans submitted by
Private Providers unless directed to do so by the County Attorney. He noted
that if the Building Department is notified of non-compliant code issues they
should be addressed by the Department.
Mr. Lombardo noted concerns on the lack of County oversight regarding
plans submitted by Private Providers and the County's possible non-
conformance with Section 468.604 of the Florida Statute.
Jeff Wright, Assistant County Attorney is preparing a report to be
submitted to the Task Force regarding the County's responsibilities listed
under Section 468.604 of the Florida Statute.
Bob Dunn, Interim Building Official noted that the inspection logs of
Private Providers are reviewed on site by the Building Department to ensure
compliance with the Statute.
Nick Biondo, East Naples Fire Marshal noted that a partnership with the
County Building Department is important and noted the same scenario (Fire
District Inspector finding a Building Code yiolation) could happen with
inspections and this area should be addressed as well.
3. Potential problems in non-compliant Code Construction and Code
Enforcement with the issuance of "Phased Permits" or "Early Start
Letters" where construction is on-going simultaneous to Code reviews.
He cited the County Parking Garage as specific example where an
Early Start letter request was rejected on 5/9/05 citing a deficiency of
"several critical areas", however the Early Start Letter was issued on
4
161
fl
r'~
8
December 14, 2007
5/24/05 before any action on corrections were taken by the Building
Department.
It was determined by the Task Force that this occurrence should be
investigated as well as the Policy of Early Start Procedures.
He further noted the Threshold Inspection of 3/16/06 cited the building as
90% complete, 2 days after the Building Permit was issued on 3/14/06.
Mr. Lombardo lefi the meeting at 2:27PM
The revisions process and continuations of construction were discussed. As
an example were the Collier County Courthouse and the addition for the
Admin/Control Area of the Collier County South Wastewater Reclamation
Facility issues which wcre included in the binder.
Break 2:35PM
Re-convene 2:45PM
4. The issue of "retaliation". Included in the report is a Memorandum to
File on his telephone conyersation with Lynn Eyans, dated October 23,
2007 regarding the Collier County Fueling Station (425 Sgt. Jones Road)
application review which contained items of contention within the Code.
Bob Salyaggio was notified that if the issues could not be resolved in a
reasonable manner and since the Fire District were not County
Employees, they would not be permitted to use the Evans Oil Fueling
Facility as they now do.
5. A discussion ensued on Phased permits.
Another example of a phased permit was Application #2006072856 with
a Phase Permit issued on 6/15/06, when the Building Permit application
itsclf was not submitted until 7/27/06.
Dave Robb of North Naples Fire Department noted these are concerns as he
had to "red tag" "Phase" permitted buildings during construction, as the Fire
Review had not been completed. Subsequent to this the Building
Department has removed the "red tag" without his approval.
Bob Salvaggio noted that the Building Block entitled "Procedure for Phased
Permit per 2004 FBC, Section 105.13" has aided as guidance for "Phase"
permits.
A discussion occurred on the determination and verification of fees paid for
the various applications or inspections; especially impact fees not properly
applied to Phase permits.
Bob Dunn noted he recently met with "Impact Fee" on this issue to ensure
fees are determined and paid properly.
Ed Riley, Deputy Fire Code Official stated he and Mr. Dunn are not in
favor of "Phased" permits or "Early Start Letters."
5
16fA
Q
~
'~
December 14,2007
A discussion ensued regarding the issue of the County processing
applications by Contractors or Consultants without proper licenses (i.e.
Specialty Licensed Contractor applications submitted by General
Contractors). Also application square footage calculations may be
inaccurate. This causes delays for the Fire District's review.
Bob Dunn stated he is currently addressing these situations with a new
training program for the permit technicians.
Chairman Schiffer noted that the Task Force intends to recommend
standardized square footage calculation requirements for application
submittals.
A discussion ensued regarding enforcement of "Phase" permits when the
work exceeds the area of approval. It was noted that some of the "Phase"
permits do not have parameters on the work permitted. Further, if this
occurs, enforcement action needs to be taken by the appropriate Department
responsible for issuance of the required permit.
Nick Biondo asked for a clarification on the procedure when a Fire
Inspector notices a possible Building Code violation or if Contractor has
exceeded work permitted in a "Phased" Permit. He has reported violations
to the County in the past and not received a proper response.
Joe Schmitt noted the Fire District and the County should work together on
enforcement issues and agreed to meet with Mr. Biondo to review the policy
for reporting alleged yiolations.
Chairman Schiffer stated the clarity of "Phased" permits and the drawings
associated with them needs to be addressed.
Bob Salvaggio's presentation was continued to the next meeting.
VII. Public Comments
None
VIII. Review offuture meeting/topics
A. Friday, January IS, 200S1PM - 5PM
. P ermi t process
. Collier Local Amendments to the Florida Fire Prevention Code
B. Friday, February 1, 200S IPM - 5PM
. Roundtable Discussions
C. Friday, February S, 200S 1 PM - 5PM
. Roundtable Discussions
. Establish Report Method
6
D. Friday, February 15,2008 I PM - 5PM
. Roundtable Discussions
. Reyiew Report Draft
E. Friday, February 22, 2008 IPM - 5PM
. Roundtable Discussions
. Review Report Draft
F. Friday February 29, 2008 IPM - 5PM
. Review Final Report Draft
G. Tuesday, March 18,2008 9AM - Noon
. BCC/Fire Review Task Force Workshop
lr< 1 A Q
, I1etember 14. 200~
There being no further business for the goo ofthe County, the meeting was
adjourned by order of the chair at 4:51 P. .
Collier ounty Fire Review Task Force
Bradley chiffer, Chairman
These minutes appryved by the Board/Committee on
as presented V or as amended .
7
,cJ-J / () i
Fiala -\IU"4-~-
/ ,," "'"
Halas ~n~-' ---.
Hennlng_~. . ~
Coyle.-
Coletta --------
16 i A'
January 18, 2008
8
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
FIRE REVIEW TASK FORCE
~r::
Naples, Florida, January 18, 2008
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Fire Review Task
Force, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein,
Met on this date at 1:00 P,M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier
County Community Development Environmental Services
Conference Room #609/610,2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida,
With the following members present:
CHAIRMAN: Bradley Schiffer
VICE CHAIRMAN; William Varian
Gary Beaumont
James Boughton
Dalas Disney
J. Christopher Lombardo(absent)
William Schreck
Chuck McMahon(absent)
Angela Davis(absent)
ALSO PRESENT: Bob Dunn, Interim Building Official
Jeff Wright, Assistant County Attorney
Paula Brethauer, Operations Analyst
Joe Schmitt, Adminstrator, CDES
MIsc. Corres: ! Le I It ~
Date:
JtBrr f'
'v
.- j~
16/ tj
January 18,2008
t'""(
'J I'
,i
I. Call Meeting to Order
The meeting was called to order at 1 ;00 PM by Chairman Schiffer.
II. Roll Call
Roll Call was taken and a quorum was established.
The following Fire District Personnel Representatives were present; Ed Riley,
Fire Code Official; Bob Salvaggio, Fire Code Official; Nick Biondo. East Naples
Fire Marshal; Bill Svlvester, Golden Gate Fire Marshal; Dave RoM. North Naples
Fire Dept.; Leo Rodgers, Immokalee Fire Marshal.
III. Approval of Agenda
Mr. Varian moved to approve the agenda. Second by Mr. Schreck. Carried
unanimously 6-0.
IV. Approval of Minutes
A. December 14,2007
Mr. Varian moved to approve the minutes subject to the following addition:
Page 2 Item D, Florida Administrative Code 6IGIS.32
Mr. Disney requested clarification related to 61 G 15 fire alarm and sprinkler
reviews. After completion of reviews conducted hy the Building Department
will theJire plan reviewers be required to pull the 61G-15 submissionfor
comparison during the suhmittal/shop drawing reviewfor specialty permit? In
response, Mr. Ed Riley stated thefire plan review will befor the
submittal/shop drawings on~vfor compliance with the Florida Fire Prevention
Code inforce and the 61G15 review will be a Building Departmentfunction.
Second by Mr. Disney. Carried unanimously 6-0.
V. Old Business
A. Water Supply
None
B. Alarm Systems & Monitoring
None
C. Permit/Inspection Process
None
D. Florida Administrative Code
None
E. Fire Sprinkler
None
F. Building Official and Fire Official areas of Governing Code review
None
G. Design Professionals interface with the I<'ire Official Office
None
H. General & Sub Contractors interface with the Fire Official Office
None
2
16./ A i 8
January 18,2008
I. Fire Districts
Bob Dunn, Interim Building Official noted that the County and the Fire
District had a joint meeting to discuss the issue of Fire Districts reporting
building code violations to the County Building Department and the
enforcement thereof. The discussions are ongoing.
A discussion occurred on whether or not code upgrades are required when
there are changes to existing structures that may affect the system or life
safety codes.
It was noted that generally, only the area ofrenoyation is required to upgrade
to existing codes, ifit is determined that life safety issues are affected, then
these areas affected must be upgraded to the existing code.
VI. New Business
A. Fire Districts, finish presentation
Bob Salvaggio, Fire Code Official, continued his presentation to the Task
Force. He wanted to recap some of the documentation and issues discussed
in the previous meeting.
Private Provider
Bob Salvaggio noted the Private Provider situation has improved but
requested clarifications from the County Attorney on the Private Provider
Policy regarding Code violations cited during plan reviews reported by the
Fire District to the County Building Department. These are issues that the
District cannot respond to and is the responsibility of the County Building
Department.
Jeff Wright, Assistant County Attorney reported back to the Task Force
regarding the issue and noted that Private Providers are responsible for Plan
Review and Inspections Review. For the County to also provide this function
would be a double review and increase costs to the County. He noted that if
applications show a pattern of poor perfonnance by the Private Provider then
the Building Department could step in for safety concerns. There is a quality
control check in the Statute that allows the Building Officials to duplicate the
review and inspections if they choose to do so.
Ed Riley, Fire Code Official noted a Fire District concern being;
If an applicant chooses to use a Private Proyider service, the Building
Department is not without responsibility to ensure code compliance. If a
permit is issued and in the future it is determined the permit was not code
compliant, the County may be held liable. This is a safety issue first, and also
a legal issue.
Jeff Wright noted that it is appropriate for the Fire District to notify the
Building Department and the Building Department should address the issue.
3
..
A, ~f3
16/
January 18, 2008
Bob Dunn, Interim Building Official noted that he is on top of the Priyate
Proyider issue. He has inspectors on site and will not process a Certificate of
Occupancy if all inspections are not completed. If a code violation is noted by
the Fire District, he has a policy in place to address it to ensure that code
compliant pcnnits are issued.
The Task Force noted that the Priyate Provider issue needs to be addressed.
Jeff Wright noted that outside of the scope of the Committee, an amendment
to the local code may bc the solution.
Parkin!! Gara!!e
Bob Salvaggio requested the status of the investigation of the issuance of the
County Parking Garage permit.
Bob Dunn stated that he will obtain the record and submit the report to the
Task Force.
Courthouse Annex
Bob Salvaggio noted the projects plans are "back on track."
Immokalee Senior Housin!!
Bob Salvaggio stated this project was reviewed through the "simultaneous
plan review" avenue for permit issuance. There was an inconsistency in the
classification of the Building Construction typc. An early start letter was
issued. There was no approval of a site development plan yet the construction
continued beyond the scope of an early start letter. This project's construction
was allowed to continue in lieu of the Fire Districts requests to halt
construction. The permit process in place was not adhered to by the Building
Department.
A time frame of the application submittals will be provided to the Task Force.
Basik Flea Market
Bob Salvaggio noted that correction 14 has been submitted. He requested
clarification on whether or not the project has been "red tagged." He
understood it is "red tagged", but noted people have been working on the
building. In his review, the County computer system notes no "red tag" or
inspection hold."
Bob Dunn stated he had requests to release the inspection hold, etc. and held
a meeting with representatiyes of the project. They were notified the building
must be brought into compliance. He stated the project is "red tagged".
Mr. Riley noted the issue of how a "red tag" is placed on a building, how it is
posted in the computer, etc. and that it needs to be addressed and the Building
Department needs a consistent policy which the Fire District can rely on.
4
"P'1
16 :}
A
8
January 18,2008
Remodelinl! & Addition - Wastewater treatment plant - 5600 Warren
Street
Bob Salvaggio noted that based on a 3/15/06 letter from Roy Anderson, PE
Director of Collier County Public Utilities and Engineering confirming work
the County agreed to complete by 111107, a temporary Certificate of
Occupancy was issued.
On 12/] 8/2006 a letter was sent to Bill Hammond of the Building Department
from Mr. Anderson requesting that no second floor access be required due to a
re-designation of space. The Fire District rejected this re-designation of space
request and to date the original agreed upon work has not been completed and
the renovated space has been in operation for 2 years without a final
Certifieate of Occupancy.
2800 Horseshoe Drive replacement of 6-ton OSA units on rooftop
Bob Salvaggio noted no resolution is in sight with the Building Department.
Two existing units have smoke control. The new one branching off is under
scrutiny. It was noted that this issue was initiated before Bob Dunn was in his
current position. He noted some of the new doors are installed in violation of
code in the Building Department area.
Collier Countv Jail
Bob Salvaggio noted that the County Jail requested permission to start up new
boilers, they were installed without a permit and he instructed them to contact
Nick Biondo.
Nick Biondo, East Naples Fire Marshal stated he spoke with the person and
notified them the boilers could not be started up as they had no permit. To
date he has not heard back and is under the assumption the boilers are
operating.
Sway Lounl!e
Bob Salvaggio stated that permission was given to start this project 4 days
after receiYing the permit application. No review was conducted whatsoever
before issuance of the early start letter.
There was a "red tag" issued on 5/1 0/06 but this "red tag" was overturned
against the Fire Districts recommendation and the contractor was permitted to
continue without the required inspections.
A discussion occurred on who has authority to issue and remove "red tags", in
this case it was a Building Department "red tag."
It was noted that the Fire District has had "red tags" oyerturned by the
Building Department in the past.
]n closing he noted the process is a great concern. The lack of consistent
policies within the Building Department and coordination with the Fire
District have created issues that become more difficult to resolve for all
parties involved.
5
161 8
January 18, 2008
Break - 2:50PM
Re - Convene 3: IOPM
B. Collier Local Amendments to the Florida Fire Prevention Code
It was noted the State Fire Preyention Code allows the ability for local
amendments if needed. The County has carried local amendments in through
the 200 I and 2004 cycles.
Jeff Wright, Assistant County Attorney noted that the County Parking
Garage application and requirements raised the issue of the County revisiting
local amendments to the Fire Code and created the Task Force to review the
amendments and recommend changes.
A discussion ensued on whether any local amendments were necessary to the
code; the status of the local amendments and proposed amendments. It was
further noted that one of the main issues was fire flows/water pressures.
Chairman Schiffer noted the original resolution states "Provide the Board of
County Commissioners with recommendations of practical revisions to the
Collier County Fire Prevention and Protection Ordinance."
Ed Riley, Fire Code Official noted that the County as well as the Fire
Districts are empowered to adopt local amendments to the Florida Code. It
was determined at the time the amendments were developed to adopt it
through the Board of County Commissioners as opposed to each independent
Fire District adopting amendments. This would provide the public haYing a
single location to obtain the amendments to the Ordinance.
It was determined that the Task Force review the following sections of the
Local Amendments in Chapter 58 of the Collier County Laws and Ordinances.
NFPA 1 - Fire Prevention and Protection
10.12.2(3) Fire Protection Plan
Dave Robb, North Naples Fire Dept., noted a Pre-Fire Plan's goal is to
provide safer conditions during an emergency for firefighters and quicker
rescues. It provides personnel a document to review before entering a
building. It can be reviewed periodically without numerous site yisits. This
requirement does not hold up the issuance of a permit. It is a condition of the
Certificate of Occupancy. It was noted a final "as-built" should possibly be
required at the time of Certificates of Occupancy and as changes occur
through the building process.
10.12.2.6 All electronic l!ates are required to receive a buildinl! permit
with fire review prior to installation.
Ed Riley noted that an access gate requires a permit as a common access
system for Police, Fire and Rescue in an emergency is a necessity. It was
6
16"} A 8
January 18,2008
noted that it could possibly be added to the requirements for Gate Pennits and
not an amendment to the Fire Code.
10.16.3 Outdoor Events
Ed Riley noted that the amendment in this section requires the life safety
requirements be submitted 2 weeks in advance of the event to proyide the
reviews in a timely maimer. It has not been a problem in the past.
13.3.2.1.1 Sprinkler System requirements for 4 or more livin!! units
Ed Riley noted that there are other requirements that provide for 3 units
requirements and this section is under review in the next cycle.
13.3.1.7.1.1 Sprinkler System Monitorin!!
Nick Biondo noted this reduces false alanns and provides notification if a
system initiates without anyone present.
13.5.3 Backflow assemblies servin!! maximum of 2 buildin!!s
Ed Riley noted this requirement is to allow the shutting down of water flows
to a maximum of two buildings alleyiating the problem of having to shutdown
multiple buildings when the work perfonned would not require this.
13.7.1.4.11.1.1 Sprinkler Systems require Audio Visual Devices on
Exteriors of Buildin!!s
Dave Robb noted this is effective for firefighters at night and the cost in new
construction is minimal for the benefit proyided. If it is a retrofit they will
evaluate the situation on a case by case basis to detennine if it is necessary.
NFPA 101- Life Safety
4.9.1 Use of Fire and Spark Producin!! Devices in Public Places
Nick Biondo and Ed Riley were in favor ofremoving this section. It was
placed in at the request of the County.
9.7.4.1 Portable Fire Extin!!uishers
Ed Riley noted NFP A 101 does not require Fire Extinguisher in some
occupancies. The amendment was to regulate the placement of extinguishers
to ensure all necessary areas are coyered.
Dave Robb noted the District is looking for an interdependent working
relationship with the Building Department. As previously noted there has been a
meeting and discussions are progressing.
The Task Force requested a flow chart for an application submitted from both the
Fire District and the Building Department.
7
'f I' 1 n
I"'~
-"j , ,~
8
January 18, 2008
In preparation for the next meeting, Chairman Schiffer reyiewed the resolution
from the Board of County Commissioners which states "the purpose of the
committee is to discuss concerns related to fire review and inspections
associated with the building plan review and permitting process; review
building review and permitting procedures related to fire review and provide the
Board of County Commissioners with recommendationsfor practical revisions
to the Collier County Fire Prevention and Protection Ordinance."
VII. Public Comments
Connie Tavalaro of Pinnacle Pools appeared before the Task Force requesting
clarifications on what constitutes Fire District review of a pool permit.
Bob Salvaggio stated that construction of a swimming pool only does not require a
review and to note that on the application that it is for "pool only; deck, gate, etc. by
others." A swimming pool with a gate, deck, pool house. etc. does require a review.
VIII. Review of future meetings/topics
A. Friday, February 1,2008 IPM - 5PM
. Roundtable Discussions
B. Friday, February 8, 2008 IPM - 5PM
. Roundtable Discussions
. Establish Report Method
C. Friday, February 15,2008 IPM - 5PM
· Roundtable Discussions
. Review Report Draft
D. Friday, February 22, 2008 IPM - 5PM
. Roundtable Discussions
. Revicw Report Draft
E. Friday February 29, 2008 IPM - 5PM
· Review Final Report Draft
F. Tuesday, March 18,2008 9AM - Noon
· BCC/Fire Review Task Force Workshop
There being no further business for the good ofthe County, the meeting was
adjourned by order of the chair at 4:51 P.M.
8
16"1 ~
January 18,2008
Collier C unty Fire Review Task Force
('
Bradley chiffer, Chairman
These minutes approv y the Board/Committee on
as presented or as amended
9
\
\
\
,
~\\\O?'
8
. 'ala /.'tx.kN~___
\;'\' 'tt'
'.-j"I"'ll;;; ,- )":. .-.----.-.--.'
101!.... ",-<.w.t~
Hennin~g_- . .._-
,;oyle . .. ,,_.. ,..
C::oJetta ... ... '... ._..
~
'T ~ ,
. ..'." r
J,~:J bl
A "'~8
February I, 2008
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
FIRE REVIEW TASK FORCE
Naples, Florida, February 1,2008
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Fire Review Task
Force, in and forthe County of Collier, having conducted business herein,
Met on this date at I :00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier
County Community Development Environmental Services
Conference Room #609/610,2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida,
With the following members present:
CHAIRMAN: Bradley Schiffer
VICE CHAIRMAN: William Varian
Gary Beaumont (excused)
James Boughton
Dalas Disney
J. Christopher Lombardo (absent)
William Schreck
Chuck McMahon (absent)
Angela Davis (absent)
ALSO PRESENT: Bob Dunn, Interim Building Official
Jeff Wright, Assistant County Attorney
Paula Brethauer, Operations Analyst
Joe Schmitt, Adminstrator, CDES
Kim Grant, Sf. Op~rations & Management CMfse~11,I~nt
JIm Seabasty, Zonmg Department '/1 IL Q
.DaleJ VI f1 0
i'em#
J
16" A R
February 1, 2008 .
I. Call Meeting to Order
The meeting was called to order at 1 ;05 PM by Chairman Schiffer
II. Roll Call
Roll Call was taken and a quorum was established.
The following Fire District Personnel Representatives were present; Ed Riley.
Fire Code Official; Bob Salvaggio, Fire Code Official; Nick Biondo. East Naples
Fire Marshal; Bill Svlvester, Golden Gate Fire Marshal; Dave Robh, North Naples
Fire Dept.
III. Approval of Agenda
Mr. Varian moved to approve the agenda, Second by Mr, Disney, Carried
unanimously 5-0,
IV, Approval of Minutes
A. January 18,2007
Mr. Disney moved to approve the minutes of the January IS. 200S meeting,
Second by Mr, Schreck. Carried unanimously 5-0.
JeJfWright left the meeting at 1: 12PM
The Task Force agreed to hear item # VI first.
VI. New Business
A. Permit Administration Software Update (Kim Grant, Sr. Operations &
Mgmt. Consultant)
Kim Grant appeared before the Task Force to provide an update on the new
"CityView" software being implemented by the County. This system will
replace CD Plus. She noted the implementation of the software is in 3
phases, Code Enforcement and Cashiering, Planning Activities and the
Building Department module with the following timetable for the process;
1. Basic Plan
Current process & future processlideas analysis: March 08
System/Process Design and Confirmation with vendor: June 08
Go Live: End of 2008
2. Issues Already Raised
Electronic Submissions
She noted that Electronic Submissions are not currently in the scope of
the CityView implementation.
Real Time Permit Status
She noted that the status of permit applications and the ability to
review "real time" comments are in the scope of the implementation
pending coordination with the vendor.
2
16// 8
February I, 2008
Website
The Task Force noted Real Time Pennit Status accessibility through the
web site along with outside web access with subscriptions and pin numbers
for persons to access public infonnation with the infonnation cross linked
to GIS data would be optimal.
3. Questions/Input
Among other items, the Task Force noted the importance of the following;
. continuing to pursue the feasibility of providing an
Electronic Submission option if one so chooses (in addition
to the paper submission option)
. the ability to requests inspections online
. the possibility of simultaneous reviews where the client and
reviewer could view the plan on the computer with
comments via a phone conference
Kim Grant noted that all requests may not be able to be fulfilled, howeyer it is a
system with a new fonnat, not the same system with an "upgrade."
Joe Schmitt, CDES Administrator stated that Electronic Submission has been
investigated and is a direction the Department wants to pursue, however at this
point it is not feasible because of the current funding situation within the
Department and timing of the implementation of CityView. He noted he would
welcome a favorable recommendation by the Task Force regarding this issue.
V. Old Business: (topics from past meetings)
A. Water Supply
None
B. Alarm Systems and Monitoring
None
C. Permit/Inspection Process
Paula Brethauer, Operations Analyst submitted a color coded document
representing the current Building Department application review flow chart
for reyiew by the Task Force.
D. Florida Administrative Code
None
E. Fire Sprinkler
None
F. Building Official and Fire Official areas of Governing Code review
None
G. Design Professionals interface with the Fire Official Office
None
H. General & Sub Contractors interface with the Fire Official Office
None
I. Fire Districts
3
:./f"'f!
161
A
8
February 1,2008
Bob Salvaggio, Fire Code Official, submitted the following documents for
review by the Task Force;
. "Phase II" of documentation provided by the Fire District
regarding additional issue identified by the Fire District
. A document entitled "Fire Plan Review Flow Sheet"
. A document entitled "Immokalee Senior Housing
Timeline"
Dave Robb, of North Naples Fire Department conducted a review of a Collier
County Wastewater Treatment Plant in North Naples and determined that a permit
issued in 2003 has not received the proper inspections or a Certificate of
Occupancy. Bob Salvaggio is compiling a report on the status of inspections for
the project and will report back to the Task Force.
Bob Dunn, Interim Building Official, noted that his Department is reviewing
previously issued pennits to insure inspections were completed and Certificate's
of Occupancy have been issued where applicable.
Break: 2:25PM
Re-Convene: 2:45PM
B. Roundtable Discussions
Topics from past meetings were reviewed for possible report recommendations.
Chairman Schiffer moved to recommend that various categories of
standardized calculated square footage areas be included on plans
submitted for approvals. Said categories to be determined atfuture
meetings. Second by Mr. Disney. Carried unanimously 5-0.
A. Water Supply
Mr. Disney moved to recommend that the Collier County Water-Sewer
District Utility Standards Manual be revised to require a low limit of 50 psi
residual for fire flows. Further, Nick. Biondo, Ed Riley and Mr. Disney
determine the exact wording of said proposed revision. Second by Mr.
Schreck. Carried unanimously 5-0.
Mr. Disney moved to recommend requiring all Water Utilities servicing
unincorporated Collier County be required to meet the same standard of a
low limit of 50 psi for fire flows. Second by Mr. Varian. Carried
unanimously 5-0.
B. Alarm Systems and Monitoring
Discussion occurred on the following topics with no recommendations
brought forth.
4
VII.
VIII.
16/ !] 8
February 1,2008
1. Ways to alleviate requirements for permits for maintenance, repair or
renovations of existing systems.
Ed Riley, Fire Code Official noted that permits are not required when
like or similar devices are changed out for maintenance purposes if the
replacement deyices are deemed compatible with the existing system. He
further stated that various Committees such as the Fire Alarm Committee,
the Fire Sprinkler Committee and the Hood Suppression Committee are in
place and continue to pursue feasible means of addressing these types of
Issues.
2. The necessity of the submittal checklist for Fire Alarms applications.
Ed Riley noted that the checklist was developed primarily at the request of
the Fire Alann Contractors with their input. It is designed to assist the
applicant in submitting a Code Compliant Design.
It was noted that the Report should recognize that the Fire District is no
longer reviewing Chapter 6IG /5 (or the Florida Administrative Code)
submittals for the Building Department. The Fire Plan Review conducted by
the Fire District will befor the submittal of shop drawings onlv andfor their
compliance with the F/orida Fire Prevention Code in/orce. Chapter 6/GI5
review will be a Building Departmentfill1ction.
Ed Riley noted that the issues raised by the Fire District regarding the County
Building Department Permit Process occurred before Bob Dunn, Interim
Building Official was in his current position and he has a good working
relationship with Mr. Dunn. The issues raised were not a renection of how
Mr. Dunn is administering the Department.
Bob Dunn agreed that the working relationship between the Building
Department and the Fire District is much improved.
Topics review was continued to the next meeting.
Public Comments
None
Review of future meetings/topics
A. Friday, February 8, 2008 IPM - 5PM
. Roundtable Discussions
. Establish Report Method
B. Friday, February 15,2008 1 PM - 5PM
. Roundtable Discussions
. Review Report Draft
5
C. Friday, February 22, 2008 IPM - 5PM
. Roundtable Discussions
. Review Report Draft
D. Friday February 29, 2008 IPM - 5PM
. Review Final Report Draft
E. Tuesday, March 18,2008 9AM - Noon
. BCC/Fire Review Task Force Workshop
16/
n
8
There being no further business for the good ofthe County, the meeting was
adjourned by order of the chair at 4:51 P.M.
February 1,2008
Collier C unty Fire Review Task Force
Bradley chiffer, Chairman
These minutes approved by the BoardlCommitt
as presented or as amended
on ~/ g ~ !!
, I
6
161i-r-~
Rt:C !\lED
~. .
, i
'. '''8
" ~'_ . I' -:"
" 'i lOti
FOREST
LAKES
RO\IlW\ \\NIlIHL\I"Ii \(;/-: \J.S:P,..(dc>"""'" ; "'''''",o.0ne;
Fiala ~'f_
Halas -L. ~ ~..
Hennlng~ -
Coyle. .--'
Coletta -----
I. Call to Order
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH
NAPLES, FL 34104
December 12, 2007
Aaenda
II. Attendance
III. Approval of Agenda
IV. Approval of Minutes - November 14, 2007
V. Transportation Services Report
A. Budget - Caroline Soto
B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard, Chris Tillman!
Malcome Pirine
VI. Old Business
A. Bond Issue Project - Sharon Newman! Transportation Operations
Manager, Mark Isackson! Budget Analyst
VII. New Business
VIII. Public Comments
IX. Adjournment
The next meeting will be on January 9, 2007 10:00 a.m.
Collier County Transportation Building, East Conference Room
2885 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, FL 34104
MISC. CQffes:
Date l ~.
c
".{\ \
ltem#:
1
-',-.....-.s to
j
NOV-I2-200r 10:44AM
16/ A
POOI/002
~8
FROt.+-
BGNNlf:SS !NC.
Pa\liJ\\1 :Ilut SllLW<XU Coamactors
1990 Seward Avenue
Naples. Florida 34109
(239) S97-6221 . (239) 597-7416 Fa~
\V\VW.bonnessinc.com
proposal
11/12/2007
Submitted TO: Collier County Alternative Transportatio" Modes
Estimate Number: 14812007
H52
Address:
2885 Horseshoe Dr. South
Bid Title:
Forest Lakes MSTU-Pavement Markings
8< Reflectors
Naples, FL 34104
Project Location: Forest Lakes
Contact:
Darryl Richard
Project City, State: Naples, FL
Phone:
(239) 659-5775
Fa};: (239) 530-6219
Engineer I Architect:
lItem #
Item DeSCription
Fnrest t akp.~ Blvd (ThP.rtnODlad'ic On ASDhalt Overlav Only)
01 6" Solid Yellow Thermoplastic (Centerline-9,OOO L.F.).
02 6" Solid White Ihermoplastic (Edgeline-19,700 L.F.)
D3 Amber R.PM.s (4D' Spacing).
04 Thermoplastic Markings Total
Total Price for above Forest Lakes Blvd. (The......oplastic On Asphalt Overlay Only) Items:
Fnrest l3lkp.s Blvd {Painted Markinas}
D5 6" Solid Yellow Paint (Centerline-4,250 L.F,)
D6 6" Solid White Paint (Edgeline-8,SOO L.F ,)
07 Amber R.P.M.s Installed (11D Each).
08 Painted Markings Iota I
Total Price for above Forest Lakes Blvd. (Painted Markings) Items:
Fo~t t .rtIkes nr'iv@ (P:.int.f't Markin9s)
09 6" Solid Yellow Paint (Centerline-4,425 L.F.)
to 6" Solid White Paint (Edgeline-8,850 L.F.)
11 Amber R.P.M.S Installed (115 Each).
12 Painted Markings Total
Total Price for above Forest Lakes Drive (Painted Markings) Items:
Side ~@@b;-s;r.oO RAn; 81 C"..enterlinbe Onlv-SI!F- NOTES
13 24" Solid White Paint (Stopbars-Re-stripe / 22 Each).
14 6" Solid Yellow Paint (Centerline'l,4Sa L.F.).
15 Painted Markings Total
Total Price for abovco Side Streets-Stop 1I.iIr"$ & centerlinbe Only-SEE NOTES Items:
SidA ~ R.p M s At Turns
11/12/20079:37:06 AM
$27,544.65
$6,024.70
$6,247.70
$1,786.42
page 1 of 2
.,;;,;
16/ 4
lEONNIESS me.
~-'8.qat\.-e and Sl(~ COrdr.1l';:roOi
1990 Seward Avenue
Naples, Florida 34109
(239) 597.022\ . (239) 597.7416 fax
www.bonnessinc.com
9
HIS
P 002/002
H52
NOV-IZ-2007 10:45A~
FROM-
Item Description
White R.P.M.S Installed (12.0 Each).
R.P.M.S Total
lItem #
15
17
Total Price for above Side Streets R.P.M.5 At Turns Items:
$1,060.46
Totalllid Price:
$42,663.93
Notes:
. Subject to prompt acceptance within 15 days and to all conditions stipulated on the reverse side, we agree to
furnish materials and labor at the price(s) set forth above, if 15 days have expired propOS<l1 price may still be
honored call to verifY.
. Painting and Stendling of car>tops not included.
. permits and/or fees (if neccesary) by others.
. Above proposal for Items quoted only.
'ThiS estimate is for one toot of paint or thermoplastic only where indicated above and R,p.M.s. There is no
off-site, signage, or emovals of any kind induded in this estimate.
. ....NOTE: SIDE STREETS: Stop bar and centerline only on Azalea Lane, Boxwood Lane, Camelia, Daisy,
Eucalyptus, Fig Lane, Gerdenia Lane, HappOlo Lane, Ivygatte Lane, Jimpson Lane, Kelp Lane, Lyonia Lane,
Milkwort Lane, r"larita Lane, Opuntia Lane, Pyxiemoss Lane, Salvia Lane, Tuppence Lane, Vinca Lane, Wisteria
Lane.
Payment Terms: Payment due within 30 days of date of Invoice, regardleSS of when payment IS made by Owner
ACCEPTED:
The above prices, specifications and tonditiuns are satisfactory
and hereby accepted.
Buyer
Signature:
Date of Acceptance:
CONFIRMED:
Bonness Inc.
Authorized
Signature:
Estimator:
poage 2 of 2
11/12/2007 9:,N. AM
j.'!'
11 /14/2007
."'.',
16/A
9
Wednesday, October 24,2007
Prepared by:
Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes
Tessie Sillery, Operations Coordinator, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes
FOREST LAKES MSTU Proiect Status
(F-36) - ACTIVE ( POC: Tessie Sillery) - Stripping & reflectors within all roads in boundary map
10-10-07: Committee requested for all the roads within the MSTU be stripped and reflector be placed.
10-26-07: Requested quote from Bonness.
11-9-07: Received Quote from Bonness - under review with Chris Tillman - Malcom's office
(F-34) - ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richard, Chris Tilman (Malcolm Pirine) Swale Project Scope
Definitions;
6-13-07: Meeting with Malcolm Pirine to review base map of swales and lakes as per Bond Issue Project
List. Map requires some minor modification. Scope of Swale projects will be derived from Base Map.
SCHEDULE:
(F-31) - ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richard) -Easement for Swales & Lakes
3-29-07: RLS sent to Scott Teach for recommendation regarding request as per Macolm Pirine advisement
that easement may be the option the MSTU would want to pursue for swales and lakes. Also included in
request is evaluation of roadways in terms of easements.
4-30-07: RLS received from Scott Teach regarding obtaining easement within Golf Course Property.
Recommendation is to proceed with obtaining easement within Golf Course for both swales and lakes.
Easement is not required for roadways as per RLS.
5-9-07: Meeting with Kevin Hendricks regarding easements. Kevin will work directly with Chris Tilman
(Consultant) and Liaison Project Manager Darryl Richard in obtaining any required easementlRight of
Entry. Recommendation from Kevin was to pursue negotiation with Golf Course based on a 'preliminary'
map (to be produced by Malcolm Pirine) of the easement areas.
7-6-07: Meeting with Golf Course - review of easements - Chris - Malcom Pernie will be sending out a
report of the results of meeting.
7-23-07: July 16"', draft document received from Malcom Pernie & County staff reviewing with
Consultant - Presentation per Quail Run Golf Course
8-15-07: (week of) Malcolm Pirine coordinating project details with Quail Run Club Mgmt.
8-22-07: RWA will be performing Survey - quote from RWA pending regarding the Golf Course
approval.
9-10-07: Obtaining scope of service from RW A - (RWA to create scope)
1
11/14/2007
16/A
9
9-12-07: RWA has provided draft scope - under review by Malcolm Pirine
10-17-07: Purchasing requested changes in Scope lump sum vs time & material and other verbage.
10-22-07: R W A has provided proposal - county staff to review and requested revisions.
11-6-07: RW A has revised proposal several times per request of county staff. Still pending on revision
11-8-07: RWA responded and Work Order is with Budget Analyst going through signature process.
(F26) - ON GOING-ACTIVE (POC: Tessie SiIlcry)- Signage Maintainance
11-08-06: Fogg moved to utilize annual contractor- maximum $10,000.00
1-29-07: Requested estimate.
2-14-07: PO for annual maintenance in amount of $10,000.00 requested.
3-13-07: PO emailed to Lykins for ongoing maintenance
9-30-07: PO closed for end of fiscal year.
10-10 -07: Requested estimate.
10-20-07: Estimate came in at $5,000.00
11-06-07: Request for PO in process
10-10-07: Received PO for $5,000 and NTP went out.
(F-25) - ON GOING-ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richard) - Pot Hole Repairs
11-08-06: Fogg moved to increase funds for pot hole repair up to $40,000.00
12-13-06: Work Order in Progress
1-10-07: Bonness NTP - $40,000
1-23-07: Bonness - will be marking pot holes.
2-05-07: Bonness marked and in process of repairing pot holes
2-12-07: Bonness repaired pot-holes. Marked areas filled with asphalt. Villas turn area remains for future
project.
4-13-07: Villas area has been completed, some minor pot-holes are forming in other areas. Bonness called
to perform inspection/repair under current PO.
10-24-07: New Fiscal Year 07-08 - Bonness - $ 11,491.61
11-6-07: Work Order in process. - pending signatures
(F-23) ON GOING-ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richard)-Desiltation of Culverts; includes telescope
inspection within Forest Lakes; MSTU Committee vote to obtain annual services from Shenandoah
Construction based on annual contract not to exceed $30,000.00 per year. Project Manager to confirm
scope of work with contractor prior to each service.
10-11-06: Committee approves $30,000 for annual contract with Shenandoah.
11-7-06: Increase to PO ($3,155.70)
1-25-07: Requested for Estimate for annual maintenance not to exceed $26,800.00
3-13-07: NTP-sentto Shanendoah
3-15-07: Shenandoah contacted to de-silt Woodshire Ditch.
4-12-07: Meeting with Mike of Shenandoah for direction in specific project areas within Forest Lakes for
desilting. Areas include: Villas near Lake 6; Pipes near Lake 8 including 4 inch outfall and 24 inch; Pipes
near Lake 13 and Lake 10. Completion by 5/12/07.
4-27-07: Shenandoah completed items near Lake #6 and Villas from 4-12-07 meeting.
5-8-07: All Hems noted on 4-12-07 are completed. Ongoing maintenance as per future request.
5-8-07: Committee requested Darryl to work with company - not following what they requested
5-23-07: Darryl met with company regarding dumping in area. - issue resolved
10-24-07: Purchasing going to BCC for approval of new contractors for annuals.
11-6-07: Pending new bid tab and bee approval.
11-14-07: Spoke with purchasing and this item will not be bid out as of yet - still working on bid process.
Purchasing advised to get three quotes for now.
2
11/14/2007
I'6 1 ff;9'
(F -16) -ON GO I N G- A CTI VE (POC: Tess ie S i lIery )-Exotic Removal- W oodshire Ditch -Lake Doctors
Annual Maintenance Contract - Woodshire Ditch & pump station - Notice to proceed ITEM 5,2005 -
$4,770.00 - Annually
5-15-05 - Purchasing required Re-Bid (quote) for project - Quotes due 5-26-06
5-30-06 - Annual Contractor Aquagenix (George Bowling) to provide quote based on annual contract-
pending
6-12-06 - PO requested waiting on Gloria
6-27-06 - PO issued and ongoing
4-4-07: New Quote received from Lake Doctors for $4,740.00
4-13-07: Quote received from Aquagenics (George Bowling) at $6,180.00; No Quote received from
Aquatic Systems. Lake Doctors is the apparent low at $4,740.00
5-7-07: NTP - Lake Doctors - $4,740.00
9-30-07: PO Closed end of Fiscal Year
10-12-07: New Fiscal Year 07-08 - NTP $ 5, 640.00
(F-15) ONGOING-ACTIVE (POC: Tessie Sillery)- Mowing - Woodshire Drive - Landscape Maintenance
Contract - 400 ft. x 20 ft. Sod Mowing. Quotes requested from annual contractors.
4-17-06; Southern Services under contract for maintenance on annual basis based on contract rates.
3-16-07: Southern Services Contacted to mow up to Forest Lakes Blvd.
5-10-07: Southern Services PO increased by $ 3, 340.00 till end of FY.
9-30-07: End of Fiscal year - po's closed
10-12-07: New Fiscal Vear 07-08 -NTP issued
(F-29) - COMPLETED (POC: Darryl Richard) -Bond Issue Finance Package
12-11-06: Meeting with Mike Smykowski, Office of Business Management & Budget, Director.
12-13-06: Requested project information sent to Mike Smykowski for submittal to PFM (Financial
Consultant).
12-13-06: Package sent to PFM for review.
1-10-7: Mike Smykowski reports that there will be a Budget Meeting on 1-11-07. During Budget meeting
there will be a review of the Forest Lakes Bond Issue. PFM or another option (Loan with a Bank) will be
recommended to fmance bond issue. Alternative funding through a Bank will be reviewed.
1-17-07: Meeting with Chairman & staff to discuss priority project list and finance items
2-14-07: Bond Issue funds are anticipated to be available after April 1,2007. Committee request to see
break-down of Cost for bond issue for next meeting.
3-14-07: PFM will be attending the meeting
3-23-07: PFM sends "Schedule" for bond issue. Staff confirms project list and schedule. Funds are due to
be released in June 2007.
5-9-07: Revised release of funds date is July 2007 as per PFM correspondence.
7-9-07: Kelly - PFM emailed a schedule regarding bond.
7-18-07: Kelly - PFM emailed a new schedule - draft debt service schedules showing
coverage on the allocated millage and a revised Plan of Finance detailing the tax reform issue.
9-10-07: Budget Dept. - Novus Exec. Summary - regarding bonding for forest lakes: Below see exec.
Summary title: 9-11-07 bcc meeting
This item to be heard on or about 11 :00 a.m. A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County, Florida, acting as the Governing Body of Collier County, Florida and the Forest Lakes
Roadway and Drainage Municipal Service Taxing Unit, authorizing the issuance of not exceeding
$6,250,000 in aggregate principal amount of Collier County, Florida Limited General Obligation Bonds
(Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage Municipal Service Taxing Unit), Series 2007, to finance the costs
of certain roadway lighting, roadway-related drainage and roadway restoration within the Forest Lakes
MSTU and to pay certain costs and expenses Incurred with the issuance of the Series 2007 Bonds;
Providing for the payment of said Bonds from ad valorem taxation levied in an amount which shall not
exceed four mills on all taxable property within the boundaries of the MSTU; Making certain covenants
and agreements in connection therewith; Providing for the rights of the holders of such bonds;
authorizing the awarding of said Series 2007 Bonds pursuant to a public bid; Delegating certain
authority to the Chair for the award of the Series 2007 Bonds and the approval of the terms and details
of said Series 2007 Bonds; Authorizing the publication of a notice of sale for the Series 2007 Bonds or a
summary thereof; Appointing the paying agent and registrar for said Series 2007 Bonds; Authorizing
the distribution of a preliminary official statement and the execution and delivery of an official
3
"f1 t','.."
.It fk
A
9
11114/2007
statement with respect to the Series 2007 Bonds; Authorizing the execution and delivery of a continuing
disclosure certificate with respect to the Series 2007 Bonds; Authorizing municipal bond insurance for
the Series 2007 Bonds; and providing an effective date. (Mike Smykowski, Director, Office of
Management and Budget)
10-1-07: Funds were transferred into the MSTU Fund.
-10-07: FYI: Rec'deanemailfrom Russell Edghill Consultant, Public Financial Management,
Inc. 300 South Orange Ave. Suite 1170, Orlando, FL 32801
(P) 407.648.2208 and IF) 407.648.1323 edghillr@pfm.comCoIlierCounty(FL)Lirnited
GO Bonds (Forest LakesRoadway and Drainage MSTU), Series 2007 - Closed transaction on this date:
(F-30) - COMPLETED - (POC: Tessie Sillery) - 0 & E Report for Woodshire Lane
Project is to determine responsibility for Tree Trimming - Woodshire Lane (Includes: ROW Survey and 0
& E Report on ownership at corners intersection of Woodshire Lane @ Pine Ridge Road)
03-09-07: Met in field with George Fogg - reviewed project - questions were raised in regards to which
trees need trimming.
03-09-07: After meeting in field -landscaping was notified of committess concerns - to trim hedge &
remove palm tree for obstruction of oncoming cars.
03-13-07: Project to be discussed at meeting - Who owns the corner of Woodshire & Pine Ridge?
03-22-07: Staff requires survey indicating location of trees prior to issue of Work OrderIPurchase Order to
trim trees. Determination of ROW needs to be made through survey.
04-11-07: MSTU Committee approves not to exceed $6,000.00 for ownership and encumberance report
and survey for the Woodshire Lane from Forest Lakes Blvd. to Pine Ridge Road.
5-11-7 : Confirmation for ownership and encumberance report cost from Executive Title in the amount of
$90.00; Request for Purchase Order submitted. PO issue is pending. Quotes for survey from annual
consultant is for $2,500.00 from ABB Engineering. - Thes two companies are not annuals - denied quotes
5-23-07: PO Request in process - waiting on a PO - $750.00
5-30-07: NTP - 30 days
6-30-07: Received All three 0 & E's on all three locations requested
(F-35) - COMPLETED - (POC: Darryl Richard) - Survey for Woodshire lane up to Forest lakes blvd.
5-15-07: Requested for quote from RW A
5-23-07: Processing WO with Contractor
6-20-07: NTP - with completion date of August 17, 2007
7-23-07: Benchmark delays - Darryl provided RW A with platt map to better define benchmarks.
8-17-07: survey completed.
(F-32) -COMPLETE: (POC: Darryl Richard) Overlay Project #1 - Bond Issue Project List
SCHEDULE:
Forest Lakes MSTU: Overlay Project No. One
3-13-07: Scope of overlay project rec'd from malcome pernie
4-10-07: Quotes for Overlay Project #1 have been reviewed. Contractors have been requested to confirm
unit cost for quote.
4-16-07: Final Quotes for Overlay Project #1 have been received. Bonness is the apparent low quote at
$189,495.79; other quotes: Quality at $197,552.50, Better Roads at $196,829.00; Committee has already
approved not to exceed $310,000 for project at March 14, 2007 meeting.
4-27-07: Approval of Work Order pending. Work Order Issue will be for 30 day time-line.
5-23-07: NTP - 5-14-07 - Bonness
6-13-07: Contractor to start project on 6-18-07 with 2 week construction
6-27-07: Completed
4
11/14/2007
16/A
9
(F-20) COMPLETE (POC: Darryl Richard) - Gravity Flow System: Proposal for Design Phase
9-12-06: Need Scope of Services from Consultant.
9-13-06: MSTU Committee approves 'Not to exceed' for $90,000.00 for the project
9-25-06: Scope of Services received from WilsonMiller exceeds the $90,000.00 limit. Wilson Miller to
revise scope.
10-11-06: Committee approves not to exceed $120,000 for WilsonMiller Scope of Services.
12-6-06: Committee notified that Notice to Proceed will not be sent to WilsonMiller until review of
proposal by Staff and Malcom Pirine has been completed.
1-17-07 : pending Malcom Pirine to review
2-6-07: Upon Consultant review and staff review NTP sent to WilsonMiller for project.
3-13-07: Wilson Miller locating existing utilities for project
4-5-07: Stop Work Issued for Gravity Flow System Project. Project is under review by Malcolm Pirine,
Collier County Stormwater Department (Oversight- In House), and Department of Alternative Trans.
Modes.
7-1-07: Project cancelled as per committee request.
(F-27) - COMPLETE (POC: Tessie Sillel)') - Engineer study -turn on Woodshire
12-05-06: Documentation sent to Traffic Operations for review of proposed installation. Meeting with Bob Tipton, Director, Traffic
Operations.
1-10-07: Bob Tipton confirms that installation is not approved.
1-17-07: As per discussion with Bob Tipton, Traffic Operations will review in terms of , SOP' for Publix shopping center and report
back to A TM Staff.
1-13-07: Discussion with Bob Tipton regarding determination of approval for "No Left Turn" sign.
2-22.07: No Left Turn Sign Installed by Traffic Operationsthrough Bob Tipton
3-8-07: Traffic Ops Director- reviewing PUD- The sign installed by traffic opsis only temporary till further review is done
(F~28) - COMPLI:TF (POC' l)arryl Richard) - Malcom Pirine Project Management Oversight Services- Committee approve
$40,000.00 for annual services.
12-06-06: Committee approved the funding for Malcolm Pirine Contract
12-19-06: Malcolm Pirinedelivers Fee Matrix for proposal
12-20-06: Staff request revised Scope of Services for proposal to math Fee Matrix.
12-22-06: Malcolm Pirine revised Fee Matrix received.
1-08-07: Work Order picked up by Malcolm Pirine for sigmture.
1-17-07: Work Order in system for signatures; Norm Feder has signed; Release from Purchasing Pending
1-19-07: Work Order rejected by pUlchasing- due to Consultant not using fixed fees.
1-23-07: New Proposal received from Consultant
1-25-07: Work Order Ready for Pickup by Consultant
1-26-07: Consultant Picked up WOo
2-08-07: WO went through signature approval and pending purchasing approval & PO release
2-9-07: Notice to Proceed for Malcolm Pirne sent
(F-17) - COMPLETE - Wilson Miller - Annual Consulting Services - WilsonMiller- Scope of Services received for $30,000.00 from
WilsonMiller; Requires Comnittee Approval. Committee approved $30,000.00 - Work Order issued JWlUary 23, 2006.
8-21-06-Ongoing
1-17-06: Reciept offmal invoice from WilsonMiller pendng, following final invoice PO will be closed.
(F-13) - COMPLFTL - BOND Resolution & Execttive Summary - Coordination with Scott Teach based on WilsonMiller cost
estimate.
6-12~06: Scott teach met with Smykowsky & will be working with Finance Board.
6-27-06: Meeting scheduled for 6--28-06
7-18-06: BCC to approve on 7-25-06 - Resolution to put on election ballot for bond issue
8-7-06: Scott Teach reports ballot will be by Mail and not by actual vote onNov. 7, 2006-As per Jennifer Edwards Spvr of Elections.
8-21-06: Tessie Uploaded new resolution superseding2006-201- consent agenda-bee 9-12~06
9-12-06: BCC Approved Bond Resulution. Approval by voters on Nmember 7, 2006 required.
11-08-06: Confirmation from Scott Teach that Bond Issue has been approved by Voters
(F-24) -COMPLFTED - Two Staff Gauges
11-08-06: Fogg moved to install the staff gauges.
12~04-06: Issue of Purchase Order pending for Work Order
12-13-06: NTP- Work Order -$1.200.00 (90 days)
2-14-07: Committee consensus is to cancel this contract. Staff concurs with recommendal:ion, PO will be calcelled.
(F-17) ~ COMPLI:TF - Water Flow Data Loggers (and related request for verification of water levels throughout the Forest Lakes
Community)
5
11114/2007
16/
A
9
7~22-03: Purchase Order for $6,000.00 Project Cost ($2,000,00 installation and $4,000.00 material) issued to WilsonMiller for
installation of water-level recorders.
3-3-06: Gordon River Outflow Meeting with: ClarerL:e Tears, SFWMD; Eugene Calvert, Director Stormwater Dept.;Jerry Kurtz,
Stonnwater Dept.; Darryl Riclmd, MSTU Project Manager; and Craig Pajer, Consultant, WilsonMiller. Clarence Tears states it
meeting that if the Forest Lakes MSTU Cat provide data that the lowering ofthe Gordon River Oltflow Weir Structure (to allow fer
better flow of water from MSTU) is justifiable that the SFWMD would consider such a proposal to lower the outflow level at the weir
structure.
3-6-06: Request sent to WilsonMiller (Criag Pajer) to verify the operational status of the water level recorders.
3-30-06: Request sent to WilsonMiIler for verificationrelated to the warranty of the recorders and location and operation of the
recorders,
5-11-06: Staff Project Manager Darryl Richard request all data related to the installed recorders and status of the recorders and data
obtained.
6-2-06: WilsonMiller Project Manager Craig Pajer delivers electronic files containing data recorded. A report indicating the
significance ofthe data was not provided by WilsonMiller. There has not been any documeIi: produced by consultant analyzing arxtIor
summarizing the data collected,
8-9-06: Committee Voted to wthorize $15,000.00 for the purchase of new (water level) flow meters for Forest Lakes MSTU.
8-21-06: Staff research online indicates that there are a variety ofprodl.l:ts available and consultation with Stormwater Department
indicates that there are products which SFWMD prefers for use in this application.
8-29-06: Stormwater Project Manager Jeny Kurtz meets with MSTU Project Manager to review the proposal, Jerry recommends
contact with Tim Howard ofSFWMD to determine which product best suits the needs of Forest Lakes MSTU.
9-1-06: Phone consult with Tim Howard indicates that the method for obtaining 'verifiable' d<ta which is "defensible' is utilizing a
product that both records the data and automatically sends it for processing. Estimated cost of product and installation of such a
system is $40,000.00. Vendors were reviewed for type of product offered: Campbell Scientific; Hydro lab Products; and YSI Products.
Engineering Consultation was recommended from County Stormwater Dept and from SFWMD for installatiCll and continuous
monitor of system ani data collected. The possibility of tie into the existing SFWMD data base collection system was mentioned
(F-19) - COMPLE"!"]: - Asphalt Repair (3 mobilizations) Pot hole repair aId other ($25,000)
8-18-06 - Bonnes to pick up WO
8-21-06 - waiting on bonnes signature
8-22-06: Bonness signed WO; issue of PO pending.
8-31-06: PO sent to Bonness;
9-19-06: Bonnes confirms that repair areas are marked and areas are approved by Project Mmager.
10-18-06: Bonness crews are onsite rmking repairs to pot-holes (1st mobilization). On Monday 10/23/06 Bonness will re-mobilize for
additional repairs.
10-31-06: Bonness Paver repairs completed.
(F-22) C< )MPl.FTI: - Obtaining Additional Scope ofSelVices for Annual Consultant; at the request of Committee Chairman and
A TM Department Director Liason Staff is obtaining alternate Sc~e of SelVices from Collier CouIty Annual Vendor List and other
private sector Engineering Firms.
10-5-06: Request for Scope ofSelVices sent to annual vendors on Engineering Annual Contract.
11-7-06: List of Firms submitting quote recorded. Staffrecommems Special Meeting for review of proposals.
(F-24) C(JMPLFll.:- MSTU Committee directs staff to meet with SFWMD concening the installation of water level recorders.
Meeting is to have Dept Director Diane Flagg, Project Mananger Darryl Richard, Consultant Craig Pajer, Clearance Tears SFWMD,
Eugene Calvert, Dir. Stormwater Dept, and one representative from Forest Lakes MSTU Committee (recommended was Chairman
Bob Jones).
10-12-06: Committee directs staff to set up meeting and obtain selVices from Mancan for minutes.
10-25-06: SFWMD recommends installation of staff gauges, WilsonMiller to provide quote for installations; In reversal of previous
recommendation - installation of electronic recording devices is not recommended and determined to be WI-necessary,
(F-21 b}- COMPI.].TI: Shenandoah Construction - Quail Forest Blvd. Desilting (includes surrounding areas within Forest Lakes
MSTUj
9-13-06: Forest Lakes MSTU Committee approved project for Shenandoah Construction based on Annual Contract rates.
10-10-06: Shenandoah Construction submits quote based on $15,000.00 amount with invoicing to be as per completion of each section
based on contract rates. Project is complete invoicing is pending. Shendoah invoiced for $13,718.25
(F-21a}- ('OMPLETE -Shenandoah Construction- Woodshire Ditch. Desilting Project
8-9-06 - Committee voted on an up to $15,000 to get clearing and restoring the drainage swale at woodshire dich (east to west
portion.
8-21-06- Pending Quote from Shenaldoah - annual
8-31-06: PO sent to Shenandoah for project.
9.12-06: Project 80% complete
9.15-06: Project 100% complete.
(F-14) CANCELLED- Woodshire Lane - Re-grading/Cutting of ROW Edge & Sod Installation
8-9-06 - Committee approved up to limit- pending Quotes coming in.
8-21-06 - WO # assigned and to be picked up by Bonness (4,962.64)
9~1-06: WO returned from Bonness and forwarded to GIIXia Herrera for review/Sharon then to Norm Feder
9-12-06: Need approval for $4,962.64 for project.
6
11/14/2007
16 JA
9
9-13-06: Committee selected not to approve necessary funding for project.
(F-12) COMPLETE - Committee member Roger SommelVilIe reI. to Swale #15 and nearby Lake; Liason Staff Project Manager and
Consultant to review project to determine any outstanding items and also the level of the Lake in relatirn to the swale level.
8-31-06: WilsonMiIler Craig P~er reports site inspected and no problems or punch list items. Victor (Engineering Tech) performed
inspection
9-7-06: Staff Project Manager meeting with Craig Pajer confirms WilsonMiller inspection finding no out<;tanding punch-list items.
(F-ll) - COMPLFTE-Mail out for Bond Issue Referendum
8-9-06: George Fogg moved to ftmd a mailing to registered voters inorder to explain the ballot, this will be done by staff.
8-21-06: Staff will coordinae with Committee Chairman Bob Jones for content of mail -out. Man Can will provide the assistance for
mailing.
9-13-06: MSTU Committee
9-12-06: County Attorney Scott Teach md Committee Chairman sign off on mailing.
9.19-06: Mancan services sent out mailing.
(F-IO) - COMPLLTL - Pump System Repair- Emergency repair of Forest Lakes Pump System on 7/28/06.
7-28-06: Florida Irrigation Supply (FIS) repairs pump system for Forest Lakes as an emergency call for $600.00.
8-02-06: Purchase Order issued to FIS for repair cost Invoicing is to Forest Lakes MSTU.
8-10-06: F1S invoice for $800.00 exceeds quote. Staff request FIS to re-invoice for correct amolU1t.
(F-9) - CUMPI ,1:1"1,: - Lake # 6- Villas Drainage Improvement- Craig Pager- County Attorneys- To determine if the project scope
is within the authorization of the MSTU Ordinance.
8-23-06: RLS sent to Scott Teach for determination of weather the scope of proposed project is authorized by Ferest Lakes MSTU
Ordinance.
9-1-06: Liaison Staff receives notification from Scott Teach that the scope goes beyond what is authorized by Forest Lakes MSTU
Ordinance. Project is not authorized by Forest Lakes MSTU Ordinance as it is not 'roadway related drainage'.
(F-8) CC);..1PLETE - Roadway Signage and Pavement Marking Study-
Installation of Signs - COMPLETED- Committee approved for signage--committee chairman has requested that consultant review
and revise the quantity of signs.
4-17-06; PO issued to Lykins for $12,045.00; Lykins begins work on 4-17.06.
5-15.06 - NTP given - project under construction - estimated to be done 5-20-06
5-24-06-Project Complete-need to have final walk-through.
7-18-06 - FINAL INSPECTION - PROJECT COMPLETE
(F-7) COMPLETE -. Painting of Markings -Quotes requested from new Collier County AnnualContractor Trutwin (Fort Myers
Location).
5-30-06; Quote from Trutwin based on annual contract for traffic markings pending
6-12-06: Trutwini requested new drawings with textthat is legable from Wilson MilIer:- no drawings reced.
6-27-06: Submitted PO request on 6-27-06
7-12 -06 : Project completed
(F-6) -C()MPLU'I:- New Committee member selected Mr. Fogg-BCC Approved on 9/13/05
Complete: BCC Approved Fogg,
(F-5) COMPI.ETE- SWALE #15 - Kyle Construction 100% complete- need consultant report on final inspection.
4-17-06; Need WilsonMiIler notifirntion of Final Inspeciton.
6/12/06 - Project complete - waiting on WM to submit letter of final completion.
627.06 - Project complete- waiting on WM to submit letter of final completion.
7-12-06 - Craig Pager to meet with DuTyI- final completion documentation
8-7-06: Substantial Completion with Punch-list complete
(F4) - COMPLETE .Swale # 7 & 10 Regrade; WM has completed design. WM completing Bidding with Annuals.
4-17-06; Work Order for Higgins pending
5-15-06, NTP - 5-8-06 - ON Higgins - Wilson Miler performing construction observatioo
6-12-06, Construction Reports from Wilson, Miller- Pending (50% completed)
6-27-06: Waiting on report from Wilson Miller
7-12-06 . Craig Pager to meet with Qmyl- final completion documentation
8-7-06: Substantial Completion with Punch-list complete
(F 3) - c()MPI.FIT - Swale # 2 Regrade;m WM has completed design WM completing Bidding with Annuals.
4-17-06; Work Order for Higgins pending
5.15-06, NTP - 5-8-06 - DN Higgins - Wilson Miller performing construction observatioo.
6-12-06 Completed - need report frem Wilson Miller
6-27-06 Completed- need report from Wilson Miller
7-12-06 - Craig Pager to meet with Ilrrryl- final completion documentation
7
11/14/2007
'fl !),W\
L 'j' '"
A
8-7-06: Final Completion Document Executed
9
(F-2) - COMPLI..TI:: - Woodshire Lane Overl~ Project-}" Overlay of Woods hire Lane, Committee Approved $48,000.00 for this
project.
5-15-06 - Work Order- picked up by Contractof- waiting for signature. - Contractor schedule - Mid June to begin.
5-30-06; Construction to begin on 5-31-06 field meeting to held.
6-27 -06: Completed- and final inspection requested.
7-12-06 - Craig Pager to meet with DuTyI - final completion documentation
8-7-06: Final Completirn Document Executed.
(F-I) COMPL[.:TF - Pump Generator-
8-9-06 - Committee voted to renla generator if its needed in an emergency
8
16lA
9
sillery t
Subject:
Russell Edghill [EDGHILLR@pfm.com]
Wednesday, October 10, 2007 11 :28 AM
christopher1.hall@bmo.com; Alecia M. Ingram; ddraper@bmolaw.com; dlichty@bmolaw.com;
Crystal K. Kinzel; Daniel Tripaldi; Derek M. Johnssen; BrilhartBrenda; RichardDarryl;
weigel_d; flagg_d; muddj; Yonkoskyj; ochsJ; IsacksonMark; PettitMichael; smykowski_m;
ValdesOdalys; newman_s; usher_s; teachscott@colliergovnet; sillery_t; rjones657
@comcast.net; bevin.presutti@mbia.com; dbergamini@ngn-tampa.com; smiller@ngn-
tampa.com; tgiblin@ngn-tampa.com; Hal CANARY; Sergio Masvidal; jeff.alexander1
@usbank.com; timothy.miller3@usbank.com
Re: Collier County (FL) Limited GO Bonds (Forest LakesRoadway and Drainage MSTU),
Series 2007
From:
Sent:
To:
Good Morning:
The above-referenced transaction has successfully closed.
all for your hard work and congratulations to the County.
Thank you
Best Regards,
Russell Edghill
Consultant
Public Financial Management, Inc.
300 South Orange Ave.
Suite 1170
Orlando, FL 32801
(PI 407.648.2208
(FI 407.648.1323
edghillr@pfm.com
1
IiihFM"
~ The PFM Group
Public Financial Management, Inc.
PFM Asset Management LLC
PFM Advisors
, A
LlIn6J'
Suite 1170
300 S. Orange Avenue
Orlando, FL
32801-3470
402,2208
407-648-1323 fax
www.pfm.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: Working Group
FROM: Russell Edghill, Public Financial Management, Inc.
DATE: October 10,2007
RE: Collier County, Florida
Limited General Obligation Bonds (F orest Lakes Roadway and Drainage Municipal Service
Taxing Unit), Series 2007
Final ~ Closing Wiring Instructions
I. SCHEDULE
Pre-Closing
Date: Monday, October 8, 2007
Time: 3:30 PM EDT
Place: BOCC Conference Room, 3" Floor
Closing
Date: Wednesday, October 10,2007
Time: II :00 AM EDT
Place: Via Telephone
II. AMOUNTS DUE AT CLOSING
Par Amount of2007 Bonds
Plus: Net Original Issue Premium
Less: Underwriter's Discount
Purchase Price
Less: Good Faith Deposit
Amount Due from Underwriter
$6,215,000.00
30,814.30
(32,628.75)
$6,213,185.55
(62,500.00)
$6,150,685.55
P;PM'
~
III.
161
)-
J.i
Collier County, FL
Closing Memorandum
Page 2
APPLICATION OF BOND PROCEEDS
From Harris
A. To Collier County for project fund and cost of issuance in the amount of
$6,] ]5,]85.55
Wirinll Instructions
Bank: Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati, OH
ABA #: 042000314
Acct# 113-8577
For: Forest Lakes LOO Bond
Collier County Board of County Commissioners
Contact: Lisa N. Melvin (239) 774-5438
B. To MB]A Insurance Corporation (MBlA) for the Bond Insurance Premium $35,500.00
Wiriml Instructions
Bank: JP Morgan Chase Bank
ABA#: 021000021
For: MBIA Insurance Corporation Premium Account
A/C#: 910-27-721728
Policy #: 502780
Attention: Clifford Pritchard (914-765-3056)
Total Wires from Harris ........ ..... .............. ..... ...................... ........................................ $6,150,685.55
9
~
.'
IV.
161
A
9
Collier County, FL
Closing Memorandum
Page 3
APPLICATION OF A V AILABLE FUNDS
A. Bond Proceeds received by County an d MBIA
From Harris - Closing Wires ............................................................................... $6,150,685.55
From Harris - Good Faith Deposit............................................................................... 62.500.00
Total.................................................................... ................................................. $6,213,185.55
Allocation of Bond Proceeds
Costs of Issuance................................................. ...................................................... $78,700.00
Bond Insurance Premium .......... .............................................................................. .... 35,500.00
Project Fund...... ................... ..................................................... .................... ......... 6.098.985.55
Total.............................................................. ....................................................... $6,213,185.55
V. DELIVERY OF BONDS
Upon confirmation of the wire transfers, Bond Counsel and the Paying Agent/Registrar will
instruct the Depository Trust Company to release the 2007 Bonds to Harris for redelivery.
.
un
II".
~~
~. .
abS
g i c. g
.P
nil
....~
h
~
:1'
"
o
iil
2l.
c-
O>
,..
'"
U>
s::
~
c
;::
0>
U>
'"
~
-c
.9.
'"
Sl
en
g.
'"
Q.
C
iD
;g;>>~ai~.~N:::: ;:; ~li!:lg8~S~~
z
.
HU!UH l UiHnU .
~~~~.~t.t ~ ~~tttt'~l
~UhHn ! !nUHi(
3~ill~c49'!D::::'" WN~"':""Ol51i"
~<" ~!:~-l-4' :-.. -4-4-4.....'-1
~ ~i;~~~~i ~ iii~!!ii:r
ig~HiU~ ~ HUU~~~
. Of%~. --. -i U' .-~~~..
!f~QnHi ~ Uhhi~l
i;H~~~~~~HHH[ ~
~~sa~Ci)&g.!!.~ !il aa!!.!!.!!.r~ !\
~~i~HIH ~ HUh~: ]
71<" ;:'~ lil....2;!-<:t <<< U'Il.o>-,.... E':
II ~ii!." 5'";:;15.....8 ~ ~~;38b1j,!! 11l
~,~~ _or Oorro5 -4
<' 2;'~ ii\r,," -4 rO'Tl'olr! 0
c. ,,' ,,,,'.r q ~r'.-."n:'" ....
lI>-< "...,., I!:."Tl ",' z
0" . 2;' ",;;", C'l
~,,~ m
!;l lI>. g- ~
,Q
.
,
~
~
~
~
~
~.
..
'<
N
..
8
r
~
.
,+
"\~";~
'1<1
.:t:.
'-0
f
$
$
"
$
~
l-
t/)
::E
t/)~
w....
::ic
..JZ
I-~
t/)IL.
W
D::
o
IL.
"
'n;
II.
Oi
::I
-
U
oc(E/}ER-ER-EfJ.EA-ER-tftEA-~
m
'"
N
~
~
Oel>
0...
ON
~18
16'1 A
9
~ , ~:) C) CJ ;:~ .;:y '"
E 0 -, <:;) in r~ c:) '"
..[ :; ,n CJ c> 'D
'" - .t I ,-
0 ,-,
;::. ,. U) <c' m
Co L ., ,oo
.." iY. "
Il '_f'; '..'1 , , n 'i.~
..
ci
a: ~
c_
.,-
co.
o
~
f/) :~
.~ ti c
g. ~ .Q)
uwen
.,
; >- :u
Z g. ~
:pO a.. c
" ."' {l.. l'l
c: 13'c,~ _.'.. c:
~<P.Q~_~aJ
Uu....J.c,:;
.....
Q
Q
N
..;
....
...
CI)
..c
E
CI)
>
o
Z
o
.~
.,
~:) en
m
.'"
..
,- Q)
5~
Ii: en
Q)
0)': (ij
c.c >
.- f/) 0
>'"0 E
~ 8 Q)
::I~a:
en .",
"0 C "i:: 'ii
c:.-..o ~
m m Q) 0
...J:;01-
Q) "'
.20
(:0
Q) 0
. en 0
gE~
- Q)"
- .c ...J
~SQ)
>O.c
a: en I-
- -- -..-. - -
~oma~ONmao~o~oaaaoa~aooao~oaoagM~ooo~
momONM~~OO~O a~oooowaoooo~oooo ~m~oo
~ ..... - . . . . .. ........ - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~_~8~g~~~R8g~gSg~gg~g~ggggg~gggggwR~ggOS
~Svo~~~oomm~o~o5oM~~~OOOM~oo~oo~a~~~~M~O ~
=..O~~maooo roao~~e ~OON~M~ ~N~ riNONNN~~N~.!-
>~m mOOWM ~~M~~~~ ~ NvovNN ~MM
<C( ~ ~m~o_ S - fI')<r---...... NltJ~O~~ "l~-..
~(Q C"')......'V T"""T'""fO
ER-ER-ER-ER-EA-EA-EA-ER-ER-ER-EA-EA-.EA-ER-ER-ER-ER-EA-ER-ER-EA-EA-ER-ER-ER-ER-ER-ER-ER-EA-ER-ER-ER-EA-EA-
. .
C"",
6 n
C) ~
~) '..11
,-
, '"
CO
'"
~ lOSN~ M i 0 m el>
~ ~ r- '" a
lll;; 0 N"'''' on 0 '" ... "'0 on
m ~~mo .n l ci N N cOm ~
"'00 00 t--...--vt-- 0 r- ~ 00 "'N l8.
.. ::1m ~ ...-coO>()) m ... ~ II) on
-~ a:ici-a:i aj
::I .- ! ~ ~
-" "'''' ~ 0
u c o~ ~ ..
c( ., ~ ~ wi
" -
W
~thER>thEflEfltA-fA.69-tA-E:R-
.'!l
c
Q)
.s
's
E
8 ~ER>f1t tA-f1tf1tf1tflltA-fA-f1t 69-. ,,-,
SaSS SoSolo
0000 00000
"CI oog"o oacicil-o
_a;oo 0 00000
"CI -v0-v...- -v 0 1.0 0 a
iji,,;t..,;gfg g~~~S'~
siN NO> or- or- ~..-
c( - -~ - ~ to
_f1ttA-fIltA-tA-tA-tA-fIlfA.fIltA-f1t__f1ttA-f1ttA-tA-f1tf1tf1ttA-
,:_) '.
C-, "'-',
(:'" OJ
,
'-)
,
C)
'j
:;) ,.-, UJ ';,
,i'} <f} f1ttA- EA-EA- EA-EA-f1t EA-M-
'I> ,.,) 'I'"
00
00
gg
on~
N'"4"-
oooooooooooooooogoo
0000000000000000 00
ocicicicicicicig.ocidcicidcicicig'
00000000 000000000
OOOMooo~mor-O..-I.OI.OM'"4"~oa
g~~ NN~M~~g~~~m~~~~z
..- CO') It)Olt) lJ')lt)it{
M~-.:i ~~
EA-tA-f1ttA-EA-tA-tA-tA-EA-f1tf1tEA- tA-EA-f1tf1ttA-f1tfA-f1tfA.fA.tA-tA-f1ttA-f1tEA-f1ttA-f1ttA-tA-f1ttA-
xl-w ~uzw~ m...J 0 ~ 0 ~
~~~ &~~~~ fu:;~ ~ eno ~z~ U ~u ~
I- :;C(I- Z a:woen a:OI-Z z~:; ~ ~u Z
~~uenen2:;:;~~0>1 enoa:oo~ ~~~oo ~enw~~ ~~z~uO
a:Z::lO@:;ooc(c(uw ~zl-enl- wOa:~ Xl-z~c(~ wzzwo~ I-
o-a:wuwa:a:>>~a:. u.c(enwI o~wa:w ~ _ W
I-I-W a:u.u.>>enl- I-Ou.'n~ m~wu w>l-~enc(c(uo ~
~ Z en U Uo II. a: a: a: a: a: en 0 Z U o:::! !:: w - - > en 0 ;:;: Wo O::l o~ a: ~ a: a: u. en 0
>wwo~enwwoowwenz~-I-a:wuuoeno~zwu...JI-~I-I-I-I-~w>w>~
:;::la:-en u.u.u.w5= u~a:-z wc(-=~ _ ~ lD
Ol-zlL~-~~~~en_ww wa:u.a:c(~en a:c(>~c(--wwen~~
c(enwzoo~~a:a:zon.u.>a:a:wl-~a:l-z~wa:g~!::~~OOz~~~
a:w>c(zzc(c(a:a:c(o oa:w5Ienw~~wC>IW~c(~c(c(c(QQc(enwenw~
::l>woooa:a:c(c(a:WZ::l:; I-O...J a:Uwl-lL~a: a:~~~a:
u~a:...Jmml-l-uul-z~WenW~OlLw~IL~...JOO~l-ul-l-mml-a:a:~
N C") 'It It) co ,.... co Q) ~ ;:
.. ..,
- -
'It'''co,,,,, ClOcnO_NM'lt"'CD ,....cocn
______NNNNNNNNNN
., '" ....
..,.., ..,
.. -
.., ..,
~ ~ ~
Fiala c~_'---
Halas ~____c._-
Henning.._.LR-----
g~r~~ta~EST
LAKES
1.'6il"i I A
~t:
i :
Ro.\D\\\ \ \ND 1H~\Ii\\( a :\I.S.I.\ ~.U"''''
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH
NAPLES, FL 34104
SUMMARY OF MINUTES & MOTIONS
November 14,2007
III. Approval of Agenda
William Seabury moved to approve the agenda. Second by George
Fogg. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
IV. Approval of Minutes - October 10, 2007
George Fogg moved to approve the Minutes October 10, 2007.
Second by William Seabury. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
V. B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard
Stripping & Reflectors Project (F-36) - A quote was submitted from
Bonness in the amount of $42,663.93. It was noted that a large portion of
the quote $27,544.65 was for Thermoplastic Pavement Markings. (See
attached)
George Fogg moved to approve the proposal for the marking of the
roads not to exceed $40,000.
Discussions ensued noting the proposal amount was $42,663.93.
Without a second the motion was withdrawn.
George Fogg moved to amend the motion to approve $43,000 for the
stripping and painting of Forest Lakes, Woodshire, and the side
streets. Second by William Seabury. Motion carried unanimously
4-0.
Misc. Corres:
Date:
) :; "! I" ~~<:. ;-:;
':i :1 ~~ut~0
'~.,.'i>:'i ,~, :Ir'~;'.:;'.~.,>~c!'<;
Item#:
~c).eo.; to
... A-,
16 I H-<'.~9:';v;:iJ
fl.'. .,,,
F()REST
LAKES
ROAD\\\\\:";!) I>R\I\M.F \I.S.r~e"
,\. ,:",\:;d:IiI",';'.";,Y:'':':3
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH
NAPLES, FL 34I04
Fiala ---.-----
Halas--r(td...f---=.:
Henr1lf'\9--- .
Coyle-A=. --€/----
Coletta ~----------
November 14, 2007
Minutes
I. Meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. by Robert Jones. Quorum
was established.
II. Attendance
Members: Harold Bergdoll (Excused), William Seabury, George Fogg,
Robert Jones, Virginia Donovan
County: Darryl Richards - Project Manger, Tessie Sillery - Operations
Coordinator, Caroline Soto-Budget Analyst
Other: Chris Tilman - Malcolm Pirnie, Darlene Lafferty - Mancan
Robert Jones requested a cost breakdown on the Bond Project.
Darryl Richard stated he would provide the PFM report that was of public
record. The recommendation was made for Sharon Newman or Mark
Isackson to attend the December 12, 2007 meeting.
III. Approval of Agenda
William Seabury moved to approve the agenda. Second by George
Fogg. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
IV. Approval of Minutes - October 10, 2007
George Fogg moved to approve the Minutes October 10, 2007.
Second by William Seabury. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
V. Transportation Services
A. Budget - Caroline Soto distributed and reviewed the Budget Report.
(See attached)
1. Operating Expense Budget $312,600
2. Total Available Operating Expense $223,802.11
B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard, Chris TilmanlMalcome
Pirnie was distributed & reviewed. (See attached)
. Stripping & Reflectors Project (F-36) - A quote was submitted
from Bonness in the amount of $42,663.93. It was nGtilld Itbatsa
large portion of the quote $27,544.65 was for Thermoplastic
Pavement Markings. (See attached) Date
Item';
-.."';',,<:':.tc
It/A 9
George Fogg noted Woodshire was not listed & should be included
on the bid.
George Fogg moved to approve the proposal for the marking
of the roads not to exceed $40,000.
Discussions ensued noting the proposal amount was $42,663.93.
Without a second the motion was withdrawn.
George Fogg moved to amend the motion to approve $43,000
for the stripping and painting of Forest Lakes, Woodshire, and
the side streets. Second by William Seabury. Motion carried
unanimously 4-0.
Darryl Richard reviewed the Swale Scope Project Schedule
stating upon completion of the RWA Survey documents concerning
easement language would be submitted to the Golf Club Board &
BCC for approval.
Darryl Richard reported there are internal drainage issues
throughout the Forest Lakes Community. It was noted the culverts
were not clogged. He also stated there was public interest in
asphalt overlays for the Cul-de-sac areas. Noted that before
applying overlays the minor drainage issues would need to be
resolved. The Swale Project was the primary objective and would
proceed as scheduled.
Chris Tilman reported there is an existing Storm Water Permit for
the Irrigation System that was installed in 1978. He stated the
Swale proposal is a modification to the existing System and a
General Permit could be issued.
Darryl Richard distributed & reviewed the Project Schedule. (See
attached) Re-addressed the Committee request to advance some
projects.
Chris Tilman stated the Cul-de-sac overlay schedule could be
advanced. Recommended contacting the home owners to discuss
the planting of vegetation in the drainage swale.
VI. Old Business
A. Bond Issue Project - Darryl Richard distributed Memorandum on
Limited General Obligation Bonds from The PFM Group.
Robert Jones posed the following questions:
1. Requested a break down for the $182,000 fees paid for the bonds
to be issued. Including the County Groups and what percentage of
the total did they receive for services.
2
16/A 9
2. When the bonds were sold was the expected return received or
was a premium paid.
Darryl Richard will forward the questions to Mark Isackson and
Sharon Newman and would be answered at the December 12, 2007
meeting.
Virginia Donovan questioned the rate at which the bond was issued.
Was the rate locked in or was it subject to change.
Robert Jones responded the rate was locked in but could not confirm
the rate. Also requested the total interest cost.
VII. New Business
A. Committee Member Attendance Requirements - Darryl Richard
reviewed County Ordinance #86-41 Section 8 applicable to Advisory
Board Members. Stated any Board member shall be automatically
removed under the following conditions;
. Absent from 2 consecutive Board meetings without a satisfactory
excuse.
. Absent from more than 50% of the board meetings in a given fiscal
yr.
. Deemed absent when not present during 75% the meeting.
VIII. Public Comments - None
IX. There being no further business to come before the Committee, the
meeting was adjourned at 11 :40 A.M.
Forest lakes Roadway and Drainage
MSTU Advisory Committee
/~~
These minutes ')(roved by the Committee on
as presented or amended
~Qv 1;;(, l DO,
,
The next meeting will be on December 12, 2007 10:00 a.m.
Collier County Transportation Building, East Conference Room
2885 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, Fl 34104
3
---._.~-.,-,
161 A 9
F()REST
LAKES
Fiala /~~'j-
Halas -r.'J;.I""'" ... ..
H enning ..~. ......._~..........
Coyip.. ... .....
Colett" . .........
RO\D\\\\\NB IH{\IN,\CI: \1."'.1.1.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH
NAPLES, FL 341f1l
January 9, 200f
Aaenda
I. Call to Order
II. Attendance
III. Approval of Agenda
IV. Approval of Minutes - December 12, 2007
V. Transportation Services Report
A. Budget - Caroline Soto
B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard, Chris Tillman/
Malcome Pirine
VI. Old Business
A. Bond Issue Project - Sharon Newman/Transportation Operations
Manager, Mark Isackson/Budget Analyst
VII. New Business
VIII. Public Comments
IX. Adjournment
The next meeting will be on February 13, 2008 10:00 a.m.
Collier County Transportation Building, East Conference Room
2885 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, FL 34104
Mise Corres I i.P l A-q
Date
l~em #...___.__"_._--
1
tc
16 I n 9
Ff)REST
LA.KES
!{O\IlW\\\ND URAIN \(;1 \LS.I.I .
Fia\~ ----.----..
Halas
Henrllng....... .... .--.'"
Gayle -
Coletta ..... ..-.--.....-. ..
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH
NAPLES, FL 34104
December 12, 2007
Minutes
I. Meeting was called to order at 10:07 a.m. by Robert Jones. Quorum
was established.
II. Attendance
Members: Harold Bergdoll, William Seabury, George Fogg, Robert Jones,
Virginia Donovan (Excused)
County: Darryl Richards - Project Manger, Caroline Sote-Budget Analyst
Other: Chris Tilman - Malcolm Pirnie, Darlene Lafferty - Mancan
III. Approval of Agenda
George Fogg moved to approve the agenda. Second by Harold
Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
IV. Approval of Minutes - November 14, 2007
Change: V. B. should read "Striping" & Reflectors Project (F-36)
Page 2 Paragraph 8 should read "existing Surface Water
Management Permit for Quail Run issued in 1982."
George Fogg moved to approve the Minutes of November 14, 2007 as
amended. Second by Harold Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously
4-0.
George Fogg thanked the MSTU for the striping.
V. Transportation Services
A. Budget - Caroline Soto distributed and reviewed the Budget Report.
(See attached)
1. Improvements General available $3,542,100.00
Line item 39 Total Budget amount of $6,289,283.88 was questioned.
Caroline Soto responded the amount was loan proceeds (from the
Bond Issue.)
It was noted that the attendance of Mark Isakson or Sharon INewBlmf>
was requested to answer the questions from the November 14, 2007
meeting concerning the Bond Issue. Date_____---
1
'tern #:_'_'
I
V
tc
161 '-A. .,9
Robert Jones expressed his disappointment in County Staff for not
attending.
Diane Flagg arrived 10:26
Diane Flagg reported County Staff does not have the expertise to
answer Bond Issue questions. The questions have been forwarded to
the Finance Committee & will be answered accordingly. Requested
Caroline Soto pursues with the Finance Committee & report to the
MSTU Committee before the January 9, 2008 meeting.
B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard, Chris TllmanlMalcome
Pirnie was distributed & reviewed. (See attached)
. Pot Hole Repairs (F-25)
1. Recommended approval for $11,491.66 Bonness quote for
overlay of Pot Hole repairs which included Manhole risers
2. Recommended approval for additional monies to continue Pot
Hole repairs throughout the year
George Fogg moved to approve the Work Order in the amount of
$11,491.66 to continue with Pot Hole Repairs. Second by Harold
Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
Discussions ensued & was determined the funds used from the
previous Fiscal Year for ongoing Pot Hole repairs was very effective.
George Fogg moved to approve $30,000 ongoing Pot Hole &
overlay work for this Fiscal Year. Second by William Seabuty.
Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
Chuck Stem pies - Mira Vista Board Member stated the Pot Holes
were not repaired in Mira Vista.
Darryl Richard responded that the repairs for Mira Vista are included
in the additional monies that were approved in the above motion.
Robert Jones requested Chris Tilman inspect the area in question to
determine the necessary repairs.
Darryl Richard reported the Bond Issue Projects in the future will be
included on the Project Status Report. The Committee reviewed the
Bond Issue Projects and the Individual Project Tracking (F-37)
timeline.
Discussions ensued concerning the Swale drainage problems that
extend from Woodshire Lane to Pine Ridge Rd.
Chris Tilman responded that a field crew would examine the Internal
Drainage System & noted the following:
. Advancement of the Regrade on the Project Schedule would occur
after determining the location of drainage issues
2
16/ A 9
. Upon competition of the Regrade the Overlay Project would
commence
Discussions continued.
Darryl Richard requested design parameters from Chris Tilman.
Ed Draguw - Mira Vista Board Member relayed disappointment from
the Community conceming the overlay that was scheduled to be
completed by this time.
Diane Flagg noted the "anticipated' project start date is the end of
January 2008. She questioned the Project Scope limits.
Chris Tilman reviewed the Project Scope as:
1. Overlay entire length of Quail Forest Blvd. to include the Entrance.
2. Drainage corrections from Pine Ridge Rd. to the end of Quail
Forest Blvd.
Discussions ensued concerning the plants in the drainage swales. It
was noted a ROW permit & submission of Landscape Plans is
required.
Discussions ensued concerning the Golf course Easement Language.
Chris Tilman stated a draft form would be submitted for Golf Course
Board review & comments.
George Fogg announced he would not be attending the January 9,
2008 meeting.
VII. New Business - None
VIII. Public Comments - None
IX. There being no further business to come before the Committee, the
meeting was adjourned by the Chair at 11 :50 A.M.
Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage
MSTU Advisory Committee
~~~* ~ ~
Robert Jones, Chair
These minutes approved by the Committee on [ - q ~ f!) 9
as presented v or amended v-
3
161 A 9
The next meeting will be on January 9, 2007 10:00 a.m.
Collier County Transportation Building, East Conference Room
2885 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, FL 34104
4
_....,1
A,9
161
F()REST
LAKES
RO \0\\\ '\ND DI~ \I'\\U \1.".1.1.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH
NAPLES, FL 34104
SUMMARY OF MINUTES & MOTIONS
December 12, 2007
III. Approval of Agenda
George Fogg moved to approve the agenda. Second by Harold
Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
IV. Approval of Minutes - November 14, 2007
Change: V. B. should read "Striping" & Reflectors Project (F-36)
Page 2 Paragraph 8 should read "existing Surface Water
Management Permit for Quail Run issued in 1982."
George Fogg moved to approve the Minutes of November 14, 2007 as
amended. Second by Harold Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously
4-0.
V. B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard
. Pot Hole Repairs (F-25)
1. Recommended approval for $11,491.66 Bonness quote for
overlay of Pot Hole repairs which included Manhole risers
2. Recommended approval for additional monies to continue Pot
Hole repairs throughout the year
George Fogg moved to approve the Work Order in the amount of
$11,491.66 to continue with Pot Hole Repairs. Second by Harold
Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
George Fogg moved to approve $30,000 ongoing Pot Hole &
overlay work for this Fiscal Year. Second by William Seabury.
Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
::)
I- """
II) 0
:::E 0
N
II)mN'
W........
~C...
::izll
I-::)E
II)LLCD
w U
0:: CD
o C
LL
-, 1_'. :t!'"
. '11
A
9
0>0
"'0
NO
~o
~'"
0'"
0'"
o~
0'"
0'"
.;
ON
0..
6";
~'"
...-
~o
-
...
'.
Q.
"ii
:>
-
u
e(fifiER-EA-fiER-fiER-ER-ER-tIt
E &; g
<( .- ,') 0
co t:: (00
o"(fj (-0" c1')
t:: E ('J
o ill V
>- 0:: i.n if) (/1
U.
C) C)
o C)
;::)0
.::) 0
00
'.(; (~J
ro~~;g~
coloocio:i
{{)O<:;!"0JO
(.q (') N {',J to
0Jro([","T~
"' N
(/)U)if)U)'J}i.f)(/)U)
In
o
liE,., ~..
c S IV .- U
CD-~m.g~
Q, "'C._'H....
o (Qa.~:J
00_ ~
C::UlU_
u ..
>- .~ ~~ ~
i5,Jl >.{l EO
,- _ Q) 0
'5.!!! 1: g2
"- .... :J > L,L.
u j! (I) . fI)
c';12,~"O:S~1i
,QJ e CD c: ('Q Q) 0
Cfl'lCfl~::i!Of-
l:: 1l .,
~
.. .. 0
E ~ c Jj '2: 0
c.i .. ..
IV .=~~" .. 0
z .oo1l [1- .CflO
~ ",UQ. u c: ..
.. :n fI) co C .. c:E ~><
... c:=-"'C~ '" 0 ~ -~ ~
c c '0 'C :J .S U <(-
~ ><- c:~"..
o OJ 0 en ,.,'" IV O.J::
muU::.s ~~ ::i!C::Cflf-
00
00
60
00
"'~
N~-
r--CJ')lJ)C>>OlOONCOOOt::'O 00
,.....("')(O')O)O("o,l(").q-I.OOO.O 01.0
CD ............. ci~
4-~~g~g~~~~gg~g 00
~B~q~~~~~CJ')~~q~q .OM
~OCJ')M~~OroO OOOO_lO ~~
>~a NOOOOCOM 1.0_(0')_ lOlO
_ N _mo ..... - ~_-
- - -~ID - M_.
fifiER-fifiER-fiEA-fiEA-fifi~_fiER-fiER-ER-ER-ER-ER-fiER-ER-fifiER-ER-ER-MfifiER-ER-ER-fiER-
.....o~
00<0
cricr--:
"'000
...000
o~
.....
OOCOa)
0000.....
oaoace)
0000(0')
00000("')"""0
OaOOQIO.....r-..
ocicicici.....:~-o
""':N""':
c;:)mO) - lOoN<O '" 0 0 0>0 '" N ..... '" 0
fIJ~~~ "'! NMvLO '" 0 0 '" 0 '" .. "'00 '"
!Mf'-.,M ... .....:oq:aio on 0 0 NO ~ ..; . , <<ill'i ;,;
:>~ljg 00 r--........vf'-.. 0 0 ~ ~o '" '" '" ~
IV "l .....ooma> 0> o. .... ~'" '" - "'''' 00
... . . - cOci-~ .; 0 .,.;
::1'-""'(")0> ..... 00 ~ N
_'t:ICO-N - <0'" 0 -
uc_ ~ "'!- ~
<(.. ~ ~ ~ ...
)(
W
~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~MMMM~~M~M0~MMM~MM~M~
11
c
.. ' ,
.5
"e
E
8 f:ltfiEA-utMf:A.fA-f:A.f:A.EA-EA-fA.M-
00
o "'
o cI)
00
ocr)
01 ,:0
1-:,
V,
CT,
,~
:)
'~J
'=-~)
1- 0
,0 'l:'""
(":.
C')
'" CO
CO 0
1O~
[.'1.....
N
en
,n
~~mu)m~mvtmm~W~fA.f:A.fA.fA.fA.f:A.EA-fA.fA.
o ooS 000000000000000000000
o 000 000000000000000000000
1:1_0 060 cicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicici
~.~ g~e ~eggg~ggg~~ege~g~~~gg
~'t:I~ ~mo N~O~~ NN~~NNONNNID~M~~
-=m moo M .....vavNN .....MM
EmN NO) M~a~ ~~
oC - -e M~. - -
fA.f:A.EA-fA.f:A.f:A.fA.fA.fA.f:A.f:A.fA.EA-.fA.fA.fA.fA.fA.EA-fA.EA-f:A.fA.fA.f:A.fA.fA.f:A.f:A.fA.fA.fA.fA.fA.fA.fA.fA.
X ~w OCUZW~ ~~m~ ~ 0 0 0 Z
<( ~~ &XlU~C::1-- ZlU::i!<( <( ~z[ U ~U ~
I-- ~~ ::i!<(~~Oz oc::m~Cfl C::~~~ ZW::i! Z ~U Z
::i! lU0CflCfl::J::i!::i!OOO CflOOOC::UQ. lU~~OO lU~- Z <(f-~O
~<(~::JO@~OO~~U~ lUCflZf-~::J ZOc::- Q.~~~::J CflCflZU
gffi~~~~[~~~~~~ *~~8~~~~~~~g~~~5~Cfl~~8~
~f-lUlUO~Cflffiffiooffi~ Cfl~C::<1--8m~~~CflO~~~OOoffil--f-ffilU~
Cfl::i!::JC::Q.W~~~~~~ w>Q.::i!U C::C::~ZlU<( f->u~f-~I--I--~>>
~~~~~OO~~~~~'" ~~ffic::~ffi~0~~~~ffi~~~~~~~~~ffiffi
~~>~~55~~~~~@ ~~~~B~~~Cfl~~@~~Q.~~~~gg~~~
u~~c::~mmf-f-UUf-Z~lUCflOW~OQ.lU~Q.~~OO~l--ul--f-mml--C::C::
... N CO') ..,
In U) t-- <0 en ~ :: ~
~~~f;;~~
::! :!:
~ = ~ ~ ~ 2 N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
en 0..... N f")
Nt") CO') M f")
~
~
Gl
:;
."
Gl
ii
CI)
U
Gl
"e-
ll.
~
Gl
1;;
co
::;
::>
f0-
CI)
::;
'"
Gl
..
co
...J
1;;
~
o
u..
i
"
'"
i
's
~
~ ;,
5' .!! :ii
~ . I. ~. 1
~ ~~""~:': ~ ~"~'''' f! :;;
...,j...lu.,u,g..i I- S!u.,...Ic: III.... ~
~ 2:;:~~~.8. 'i~~'" ':;~;,.
W ~~~~N~ ~ _~.o ~!i~
[ ~eiifiH ~ ifih~~i~
I rlnul! inUliii
~et~iU.n ~ tii~~!i~~
.~t.iHJif8t-llH.i .,,,Ii
~~ 81nh~ ~ ~1U.; ~~!
~iIT'=H i ~H.dgg.
!] ~~~~~: ~ ~~~iili,!
",~t~_n._- . -~~,a~~i$
~~~H~H~ ~ ~HHH d
.iilHHH ~ ~UHHH
. Ij~nnn lln~~t!H
~u..aD:::a;a;e:::a:a:: II:: D:::a::a::~zda:dd:
.
z
'!!i;s~S~:g:gb8~ e ::$::!~:!~~~:'!~
lie
16 !
m A 9
9
~
~
~
.
~
~
~
~
a~
~.~
~j~
lii~
.~I'
~. ~
hs
i~H
~ill
.
12/12/2007
1161
tfI* A
9
December 12, 2007
Prepared by:
Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes
Tessie Sillery, Operations Coordinator, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes
FOREST LAKES MSTU Proiect Status
(F-36) . ACTIVE ( POC: Tessie Sillery) - Stripping & rellectors within all roads in boundary map
10-10-07: Committee requested for all the roads within the MSTU be stripped and rellector be placed.
10-26-07: Requested quote from Bonness.
11-9-07: Received Quote from Bonness - under review with Chris Tillman - Malcom's office
11-14-07: committee approved Quote - $ 42,663.93 - Bonness
11-20-07: WO in progress - for signatures
12-10-07: WO & PO - NTP pending to be sent out.
12-12-07: Notice to Proceed sent to Bonness for project. Bonness will schedule for start work within the
week of Dec. 12th
(F-37) - ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richard, Chris Iilman (Malcolm Pirinc) -BOND ISSUE PROJECTS-
INDIVIDUAL PROJECT TRACKING:
12-12-07: Individual projects added to project manager list for tracking of each preject.
Project Description Start/End
No.
01 Install gravity storm sewer from PS to Gordon River'
02 Forest Lakes Blvd. relief sewer to Lake 10'
03 Quail Forest Blvd. North Entrance regrading and paving'
04 Regrade Swale NO.6. Total regrade length approximately 1,500 L.F*
05 Regrade Swale No.1. Total regrade length approximately 1,250 L.F*
06 Regrade Swale NO.3. Total regrade length approximately 300 L.F*
07 Regrade Swale No.4. Total regrade length approximately 570 L.F.'
08 Regrade Swale No. 12. Total regrade length approximately 2,700 L.F*
09 Regrade Swale No. 13. Total regrade length approximately 700 L.F.'
10 Regrade Swale Nos. 14a and 14b adjacent to Emerald Greens. Total regrade length
approximately 2,800 L.F.'
II Regrade Swale No. 11. Total regrade length approximately 1,500 L.F.'
12 Regrade Swale NO.9. Total regrade length approximately 600 L.F.'
13 Regrade Swale No.8. Total regrade length approximately 1,100 L.F*
14 Single Family Area - Side Yard Swale RegradelRoad Cross Drains'
15 New Storm Sewer Outfall at Fairways at Emerald Greens'
16 Overlay Forest Lakes Blvd. and cul-de-sacs throughout Single Family Area'
17 Rebuild Woodshire Lane from Pine Ridge Road to Single Family Area'
18 Overlay Quail Forest Blvd. from GC Clubhouse to southern end'
19 Overlay Forest Lakes Drive and side streets from Forest Lakes Blvd. to south end'
Note: 'indicates cost based on previous estimate from WilsonMiller
(F-34) - ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richard, Chris Tilman (Malcolm Pirine) -- Swale Project Scope
Defmitions;
6-13-07: Meeting with Malcolm Pirine to review base map of swales and lakes as per Bond Issue Project
List. Map requires some minor modification. Scope of Swale projects will be derived from Base Map.
1
12/12/2007
161 i~i
'. Ii
9
SCHEDULE:
Fo.,... Llkesr.usTU: Swale Sc:ope o.fl~!tIO.,. ~ p~
PHASE__"....~
CONST. Overlay Rrojects 16& 17 61151()H/1~Q7.p~OJEeT Q9MPLETE
Doeument Prep.. Sw;;lle Projects 7/11Q1-1/3OJ08i.1~ PROGRESS (50% COmplete)
NTP Survey - RWA 1111412007
60 Day Survey 11114107-1113/08
Survey Comp/etll 1113!2008
Golf Clu.b80;;lrd Meeting-approval 2I1~1!
BCC Approval~nts . 31251?OO8
acC Ap~I.Cl,lntrllctor BIds 312~8
Begin Swafe Projects 4/112008
90 Day conlllrUction 411120Q8.6130J08
SwaJe Construction Complete 613012008
(F-31) - ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richard).Easement for Swales & Lakes
3-29-07: RLS sent to Scott Teach for recommendation regarding request as per Macolm Pirine advisement
that easement may be the option the MSTU would want to pursue for swales and lakes. Also included in
request is evaluation of roadways in terms of easements.
4-30-07: RLS received from Scott Teach regarding obtaining easement within Golf Course Property.
Recommendation is to proceed with obtaining easement within Golf Course for both swales and lakes.
Easement is not required for roadways as per RLS.
5-9-07: Meeting with Kevin Hendricks regarding easements. Kevin will work directly with Chris Tilman
(Consultant) and Liaison Project Manager Darryl Richard in obtaining any required easement/Right of
Enlly. Recommendation from Kevin was to pursue negotiation with Golf Course based on a 'preliminary'
map (to be produced by Malcolm Pirine) of the easement areas.
7-6-07: Meeting with Golf Course - review of easements - Chris - Malcom Pernie will be sending out a
report of the results of meeting.
7-23-07: July 16"', draft document received from Malcom Pernie & County staff reviewing with
Consultant - Presentation per Quail Run Golf Course
8-15-07: (week of) Malcolm Pirine coordinating project details with Quail Run Club Mgmt.
8-22-07: RWA will be perfonning Survey - quote from RWA pending regarding the Golf Course
approval.
9-10-07: Obtaining scope of service from RW A - (RWA to create scope)
9-12-07: RWA has provided draft scope - under review by Malcolm Pirine
10-17-07: Purchasing requested changes in Scope hunp sum vs time & material and other verbage.
10-22-07: RWA has provided proposal - county staff to review and requested revisions.
11-6-07: RW A has revised proposal several times per request of county staff. Still pending on revision
11-8-07: RWA responded and Work Order is with Budget Analyst going through signature process.
11-20-07: NTP sent on 11-20-07 - 60 days - $58,305.50 to be completed by January 19'h, 2008.
(F26) - ON GOING-ACTIVE (POC Tessie SilIery) - Signage Maintainance
11-08-06: Fogg moved to utilize annual contractor - maximum $] 0,000.00
1-29-07: Requested estimate.
2-14-07: PO for annual maintenance in amount 01.$10,000.00 requested.
3-13-07: PO emailed to Lykins for ongoing maintenance
9-30-07: PO closed for end oftiscal year.
10-10 -07: Requested estimate.
10-20-07: Estimate came in at $5,000.00
11-06-07: Request for PO in process
10-10-07: Received PO for $5,000 and NTP went out.
2
12/12/2007
16 I f1
9
(F-25) - ON GOING-ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richard) - Pot Hole Repairs
11-08-06: Fogg moved to increase funds for pot hole repair up to $40,000.00
12-13-06: Work Order in Progress
1-10-07: Bonness NTP - $40,000
1-23-07: Bonness - will be marking pot holes.
2-05-07: Bonness marked and in process of repairing pot holes
2-12-07: Bonness repaired pot-holes. Marked areas filled with asphalt. Villas turn area remains for future
project.
4-13-07: Villas area has been completed, some minor pot-holes are forming in other areas. Bonness called
to perform inspection/repair under current PO.
10-24-07: New Fiscal Vear 07-08 - Bonness - $ 11,491.61
11-6-07: Work Order in process. - pending signatures
11-20-07: Work Order rejected by Newman for minutes backup.
12-10-07: Need to have committee approve the amount for the Work Order - $11,491.61
(F-23) ON GOING-ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richardl-Desiltation of Culverts; includes telescope
inspection within Forest Lakes; MSTU Committee vote to obtain annual services from Shenandoah
Construction based on annual contract not to exceed $30,000.00 per year. Project Manager to confinn
scope of work with contractor prior to each service.
10-11-06: Committee approves $30,000 for annual contract with Shenandoah.
11-7-06: Increase to PO ($3, 155.70)
1-25-07: Requested for Estimate for annual maintenance not to exceed $26,800.00
3-13-07: NTP - sent to Shanendoah
3-15-07: Shenandoah contacted to de-silt Woodshire Ditch.
4-12-07: Meeting with Mike of Shenandoah for direction in specific project areas within Forest Lakes for
desilting. Areas include: Villas near Lake 6; Pipes near Lake 8 including 4 inch outfall and 24 inch; Pipes
near Lake 13 and Lake 10. Completion by 5/12/07.
4-27-07: Shenandoah completed items near Lake #6 and Villas from 4-12-07 meeting.
5-8-07: All Items noted on 4-12-07 are completed. Ongoing maintenance as per future request.
5-8-07: Committee requested Darryl to work with company - not following what they requested
5-23-07: Darryl met with company regarding dumping in area. - issue resolved
10-24-07: Purchasing going to BCC for approval of new contractors for annuals.
11-6-07: Pending new bid tab and bcc approval.
11-14-07: Spoke with purchasing and this item will not be bid out as of yet - still working on bid process.
Purchasing advised to get three quotes for now.
(F-16) -ON GOING-ACTIVE (pOC: Tessie Slllery)-Exotic Removal- Woodshire Ditch -Lake Doctors
Annual Maintenance Contract - Woodshire Ditch & pump station - Notice to proceed ITEM 5, 2005 -
$4,770.00 - Annually
5-15-05 - Purchasing required Re-Bid (quote) for project - Quotes due 5-26-06
5-30-06 - Annual Contractor Aquagenix (George Bowling) to provide quote based on annual contract-
pending
6-12-06 - PO requested waiting on Gloria
6-27-06 - PO issued and ongoing
4-4-07: New Quote received from Lake Doctors for $4,740.00
4-13-07: Quote received from Aquagenics (George Bowling) at $6,180.00; No Quote received from
Aquatic Systems. Lake Doctors is the apparent low at $4,740.00
5-7-07: NTP - Lake Doctors - $4,740.00
9-30-07: PO Closed end of Fiscal Vear
10-12-07: New Fiscal Vear 07-08 - NTP $ 5, 640.00
3
12/12/2007
16"
A
(F-15) ONGOING-ACTIVE (POC: Tessie Sillery) - Mowing - Woodshire Drive - Landscape Maintenance
Contract - 400 ft. x 20 ft. Sod Mowing. Quotes requested from annual contractors.
4-17-06; Southern Services under contract for maintenance on annual basis based on contract rates.
3-16-07: Southern Services Contacted to mow up to Forest Lakes Blvd.
5-10-07: Southern Services PO increased by $ 3, 340.00 till end ofFV.
9-30-07: End of Fiscal year - po's closed
10-12-07: New Fiscal Vear 07-08 -NTP issued
(F-29) - COMPLETED (POC: Darryl Richard) -Bond Issue Finance Package
12-11-06: Meeting with Mike Smykowski, Office of Business Management & Budget, Director.
12-13-06: Requested project information sent to Mike Smykowski for submittal to PFM (Financial
Consultant).
12-13-06: Package sent to PFM for review.
1-10-7: Mike Smykowski reports that there will be a Budget Meeting on 1-11-07. During Budget meeting
there will be a review of the Forest Lakes Bond Issue. PFM or another option (Loan with a Bank) will be
recommended to finance bond issue. Alternative funding through a Bank will be reviewed.
1-17-07: Meeting with Chairman & staff to discuss priority project list and fmance items
2-14-07: Bond Issue funds are anticipated to be available after April I, 2007. Committee request to see
break-down of Cost for bond issue for next meeting.
3-14-07: PFM will be attending the meeting
3-23-07: PFM sends "Schedule" for bond issue. Staff confirms project list and schedule. Funds are due to
be released in June 2007.
5-9-07: Revised release of funds date is July 2007 as per PFM correspondence.
7-9-07: Kelly - PFM emailed a schedule regarding bond.
7-18-07: Kelly - PFM emailed a new schedule - draft debt service schedules showing
coverage on the allocated millage and a revised Plan of Finance detailing the tax reform issue.
9-10-07: Budget Dept. - Novus Exec. Summary - regarding bonding for forest lakes: Below see exec.
Summary title: 9-11-07 bee meeting
This item to be heard on or about 11 :00 a.m. A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of
Collisr County, Florida, acting as the Governing Body of Collier County I Florida and the Forest Lakes
Roadway and Drainage Municipal Service Taxing Unit, authorizing the issuance of not exceeding
$6,250,000 in aggregate principal amount of Collier County, Florida Limited General Obligation Bonds
(Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage Municipal Service Taxing Unit), Series 2007, to finance the costs
of certain roadway lighting, roadway-related drainage and roadway restoration within the Forest Lakes
MSTU and to pay certain costs and expenses Incurred with the issuance of the Series 2007 Bonds;
Providing for the payment of said Bonds from ad valorem taxation levied in an amount which shall not
exceed four mills on all taxable property within the boundaries of the MSTU; Making certain covenants
and agreements in connection therewith; Providing for the rights of the holders of such bonds;
authorizing the awarding of said Series 2007 Bonds pursuant to a public bid; Delegating certain
authority to the Chair for the award of the Series 2007 Bonds and the approval of the terms and details
of said Series 2007 Bonds; Authorizing the publication of a notice of sale for the Series 2007 Bonds or a
summary thereof; Appointing the paying agent and registrar for said Series 2007 Bonds; Authorizing
the distribution of a preliminary official statement and the execution and delivery of an official
statement with respect to the Series 2007 Bonds; Authorizing the execution and delivery of a continuing
disclosure certificate with respect to the Series 2007 Bonds; Authorizing municipal bond insurance for
the Series 2007 Bonds; and providing an effective date. (Mike Smykowskl, Director, OffIce of
Management and Budget)
1O~1-07; Funds were transferred into the MSTU Fund.
-10-07: FYI: Rec'de an email from Russell Edghill Consultant, Public Financial Management,
Inc. 300 South Orange Ave. Suite 1170, Orlando, FL 32801
IPI 407.648.2208 and IF) 407.648.1323 edghillr@pfm.comCollierCounty(FL)Limited
GO Bonds (Forest LakesRoadway and Drainage MSTU), Series 2007 - Closed transaction on this date:
4
12/12/2007
lSfrJ
A
9
(F-30) - COMPLETED - (pOC: Tessie Sillery) - 0 & E Report for Woodshire Lane
Project is to detennine responsibility for Tree Trimming - Woodshire Lane (Includes: ROW Survey and 0
& E Report on ownership at comers intersection of Woodshire Lane @ Pine Ridge Road)
03-09-07: Met in field with George Fogg - reviewed project - questions were raised in regards to which
trees need trimming.
03-09-07: After meeting in field -landscaping was notified of committess concerns - to trim hedge &
remove pahn tree for obstruction of oncoming cars.
03-13-07: Project to be discussed at meeting - Who owns the comer of Woodshire & Pine Ridge?
03-22-07: Staff requires survey indicating location of trees prior to issue of Work Order/Purchase Order to
trim trees. Detennination of ROW needs to be made through survey.
04-11-07: MSTU Committee approves not to exceed $6,000.00 for ownership and encumberance report
and survey for the Woodshire Lane from Forest Lakes Blvd. to Pine Ridge Road.
5-11-7 : Confinnation for ownership and encumberance report cost from Executive Title in the amount of
$90.00; Request for Purchase Order submitted. PO issue is pending. Quotes for survey from annual
consultant is for $2,500.00 from ABB Engineering. - Thes two companies are not annuals - denied quotes
5-23-07: PO Request in process - waiting on a PO - $750.00
5-30-07: NTP - 30 days
6-30-07: Received All three 0 & E's on all three locations requested
(F-35) - COMPLETED - (POC: Darryl Richard) Survey for Woodshire lane up to Forest lakes blvd.
5-15-07: Requested for quote from RW A
5-23-07: Processing WO with Contractor
6-20-07: NTP - with completion date of August 17,2007
7-23-07: Benchmark delays - Danyl provided RW A with platt map to better defme benchmarks.
8-17-07: survey completed.
(F-32) -{:OMPLETF: (POC: Darryl Richard) Overlay Project #1 - Bond Issue Project List
SCHEDULE:
Forest Lakes MSTU: Overlay Project No. One
3-13-07: Scope of overlay project rec'd from malcome pernie
4-10-07: Quotes for Overlay Project # I have been reviewed. Contractors have been requested to confmn
unit cost for quote.
4-16-07: Final Quotes for Overlay Project #1 have been received. Bonness is the apparent low quote at
$189,495.79; other quotes: Quality at $197,552.50, Better Roads at $196,829.00; Committee has already
approved not to exceed $310,000 for project at March 14,2007 meeting.
4-27-07: Approval of Work Order pending. Work Order Issue will be for 30 day time-line.
5-23-07: NTP - 5-14-07 - Bonness
6-13-07: Contractor to start project on 6-18-07 with 2 week construction
6-27-07: Completed
(F-20) COMI'Un (POC: Darryl Richard) - Gravity Flow System: Proposal for Design Phase
9-12-06: Need Scope of Services from Consultant.
9-13-06: MSTU Committee approves 'Not to exceed' for $90,000.00 for the project
9-25-06: Scope of Services received from WilsonMiller exceeds the $90,000.00 limit. WilsonMiller to
revise scope.
10-11-06: Committee approves not to exceed $120,000 for Wilson Miller Scope of Services.
12-6-06: Committee notified that Notice to Proceed will not be sent to WilsonMiller until review of
proposal by Staff and Malcom Pirine has been completed.
1-17 -07 : pending Malcom Pirine to review
2-6-07: Upon Consultant review and staff review NTP sent to WilsonMiller for project.
3-13-07: Wilson Miller locating existing utilities for project
4-5-07: Stop Work Issued for Gravity Flow System Project. Project is under review by Malcolm Pirine,
Collier County Stonnwater Department (Oversight-In House), and Department of Alternative Trans.
Modes.
5
12/12/2007
.,
,J.. ·
"".
A
9
7-1-07: Project cancelled as per committee request.
(F-27) -COMPLETE (pOC Tessie Sil1e!)') - Engineer study - turn on Woodshire
12-05-06: Documentation sent to Traffic Operations for review of proposed installation. Meeting with Bob Tipton, Director, Traffic
Operations.
1-) 0-07: Bob Tipton confirms that installation is not approved,
1-17-07: As per discussion with Bob Tipton, Traffic Operations will review in terms of 'SDP' for Publix ~opping center and report
back to A TM Staff,
1-13-07: Discussion with Bob Tipton regarding determination of approval for "No Left Turn" sign.
2-22-07: No Left Turn Sign Installed by Traffic Operations through Bob Tipton
3-8-07: Traffic Ops Director - reviewing PUD - The sign installed by traffic ops is only tempofmy till further review is done
(F-28) - COMPLETE (POC Darryl Richard) - Malcom Pirine Project Management Oversight Services- Committee approve
$40,000.00 for annual services.
12-06-06: Committee approved the funding for Malcolm Pirine Contract
12-19-06: Malcolm Pirine delivers Fee Matrix for proposal
12-20-06: Staff request revised Scope of Services for proposal to match Fee Matrix.
12-22-06: Malcolm Pirine revised Fee Matrix received.
1-08-07: Work Order picked up by Malcolm Pirine for signature.
1-17-07' Work Order in system for signatures; Nann Feder has signed; Release from Purchasing Pending
1-19-07: Work Order rejected by pun;hasing - due to Consultant not using fixed fees.
1-23-07: New Proposal received from Consultant
1~25-07: Work Order Ready for Pickup by Consultant
1-26-07: Consultant Picked up WOo
2-08-07: WO went through signature approval and pending purchasing approval & PO release
2-9-07: Notice to Proceed for Malcolm Pirhe sent
(F-17) - COMPI ./.Tl: - Wilson Miller - Annual Consulting Services - WilsonMiller- Scope of Services received for $30,000.00 from
WilsonMiller; Requires Comnittee Approval. Committee approved $30,000.00 - Work Order issued January 23, 2006
8-21-06 - Ongoing
1-17-06: Reciept offmal invoice trom WilsonMiller pendhg, following final invoice PO will be closed.
(F-13) - COMPI.f:'rl': - BOND Resolution & Execltive Summary - Coordination with Scott Teach based on WilsonMiIler cost
estimate.
6-12~06: Scott teach met with Smykowsky & will be working with Finance Board,
6-27-06: Meeting scheduled for 6-28-06
7-18-06: BCC to approve on 7-25-06 - Resolution to put on election ballot for bond issue
8-7-06: Scott Teach reports ballot will be by ~tail and not by actual vote on Nov. 7, 2006-As per Jennifer Edwards Spvr of Elections.
8-21-06: Tessie Uploaded new resolution superseding 2006-201 - consent agenda -bec 9~12-06
9-12-06: BCC Approved Booo Resulution. Approval by voters on NO\ember 7, 2006 required.
11-08-06: Confirmation tram Scott Teach that Bond Issue has been approved by Voters
(F-24) -(XlMPLETED - Two Staff Gauges
11-08-06' Fogg moved to install the staff gauges.
12-04-06: Issue of Purchase Order pending for Work Order
12-13-06: NTP - Work Order-$1,200.00 (90 days)
2-14-07: Committee consensus is to cancel this contract StafIconcurs with recommendation, PO will be c<r1celled.
(F-17) - COMPIElT:: ~ Water Flow Data Loggers (and related request for verification of water levels throughOlt the Forest Lakes
CommWlity)
7-22-03: Purchase Order for $6,000.00 Project Cost ($2,000.00 installation and $4,000.00 material) issued to WilsonMiller for
instaJlation of water-level recorders.
3.3-06: Gordon River Outflow Meeting with: Clarerce Tears, SFWMD; Eugene Calvert, Director Stormwater Dept.;Jerry Kurtz,
Stormwater Dep!.; Darryl Rictmd, MSTU Project Manager; and Craig Pajer, Consultant, Wilsontv1i.Iler. Clarence Tears :tates in
meeting that if the Forest Lakes MSTU can provide data that the lowering of the Gordon River Oltflow Weir Structure (to allow foc
better flow of water from MSTU) is justifiable that the SFWMD would consider such a proposal to lower the outflow level at the weir
structure.
3-6-06: Request sent to WilsonMiller (Criag Pajer) to veritY the operational status of the water Level recorders.
3-30-06: Request sent to WilsonMiller for verification related to the warranty of the recorders and location and operation of the
recorders,
5-11-06: Staff Project Manager Darryl Richard request all data related to the installed recorders and status of the recorders and data
obtained,
6-2-06: WilsonMiller Project Manager Craig Pajer delivers electronic files containing data recorded. A report indicating the
significance ofthe data was not provided by WilsonMiller. There has not been any documert produced by consultant analyzing aMlor
summarizing the data collected,
8-9-06: Committee Voted to wthorize $15,000.00 for the purchase of new (water level) flow meters for Forest Lakes MSTU,
6
12/1212007
161
r,
"
9
8~21-06: Staff research online indicates that there are a variety ofprodl.l:ts available and consultation with Stonnwater Department
indicates that there are products which SFWMD prefers for use in this application.
8-29-06: Stonnwater Project lvfanager Jeny Kurtz meets with MSTU Project Manager to review the proposal, Jerry recommends
contact with Tim Howard ofSFWMD to detennine which product best suits the needs afForest Lakes MSTU.
9-1-06: Phone consult with Tim Howard indicates that the method for obtaining 'verifiable' dcta which is 'defensible' is utilizing a
product that both records the data and automatically sends it for processing. Estimated cost of product and installation of such a
system is $40,000.00. Vendors were reviewed for type of product offered: Campbell Scientitic; Hydro lab Prowcts; and YSI Products.
Engineering Consultation was recommended from County Stormwater Dept. and from SFWMD for installatirn and continuous
monitor of system an1 data collected. The possibility of tie into the existing SFWMD data base collection systemwas mentioned
(F-19) - COMPI.FTE - Asphalt Repair (3 mobilizations) Pot hole repair and other ($25,000)
8-18-06 - Bonnes to pick up WO
8-21-06 - waiting on bonnes signature
8-22.06: Bonness signed WO; issue of PO pending.
8-31-06: PO sentto Bonness;
9-19-06: Bonnes confirms that repair areas are marked and areas are approved by Project rvtanager.
10-18-06: Bonness crews are onsite lmking repairs to pot-holes (1st mobilization). On Monday 10/23/06 Bonness will re-mobilize for
additional repairs.
10-31-06: Bonness Paver repairs completed.
(F-22) COMPLETE - Obtaining Additional Scope of Services for Annual Consultant; at the request of Committee Chairman and
A TM Department Director Liason Staff is obtaining alternate Scope of Services from Collier Coulty Annual Vendor List and other
private sector Engineering Firms.
10-5-06: Request for Scope of Services sent to annual vendors on Engineering Ammal Contract.
11-7-06: List of Firms submitting quote recorded. Staffrecommeros Special Meeting for reviC\.V of proposals.
(F-24) COMPLETF - MSTU Committee directs staff to meet with SFWMD concening the installation of water level recorders.
Meeting is to have Oept. Director Diane Flagg, Project Mananger Darryl Richard, Consultant Craig Pajer, Clearance Tears SFWMD,
Eugene Calvert, Oir. Stormwater Dept, and one representative from Forest Lakes MSTU Committee (recommended was Chairman
Bob Jones).
10-12-06: Committee directs staff to set up meeting and obtain services from Mancan for minutes.
10-25-06: SFWMD recommends installation of staff gauges, WilsonMiller to provide quote for installations; In reversal of previous
recommendation - installation of electronic recording devices is not recommended and determined to be un-necessary.
(F-2Ib}- COMPl.l-'TE Shenandoah Construction - Quail Forest Blvd. Desilting (includes surrounding areas within Forest Lakes
MSTU)
9.13-06: Forest Lakes MSTU Committee approved project for Shenandoah Construction based on Annual Contract rates.
10-10-06: Shenandoah Construction submits quote based on $15,000.00 amount with invoicing to be as per completion of each section
based on contract rates. Project is complete invoicing is pending. Shendoah invoiced for $13,718.25
(F-2Ia}- ,~'OMPIJ:TJ-.: .Shenandoah ConstnJl..1ion - Woodshire Ditch. Oesilting Project
8-9-06 - Committee voted on an up to $15,000 to get clearing and restoring the drainage swale at woodshire dtch (east to west
portion.
8.21-06 - Pending Quote from Shenandoah - annual
8-31-06: PO sent to Shenandoah for project.
9-12-06: Project 80% complete
9-15-06: Project 100% complete.
(F-14) CANCELLED - Woodshire Lane - Re-grading/Cutting of ROW Edge & Sod Installation
8.9.06 - Committee approved up to limit - pending Quotes coming in.
8-21-06 - WO # assigned and to be picked up by Bonness (4,962.64)
9.1-06: WO returned from Bonness and forwarded to GI(t'ia Herrera for review/Sharon then to Norm Feder
9-12-06: Need approval for $4,962.64 for project.
9-13-06: Committee selected not to approve necessary funding for project.
(F-12) COMPLETE - Committee member Roger SommelVille reI. to Swale #15 and nearby Lake; Liason StatrProject Manager and
Consultant to review project to determine any outstanding items and also the level of the Lake in relatioo to the swale level.
8.31-06: WilsonMiller Craig Pljer reports site inspected and no problems or punch list items. Victor (Engineering Tech) perfonned
inspection.
9-7.06: StatrProject Manager meeting with Craig Pajer confirms WilsonMiller inspection finding no outstanding punch-list items.
(F-II) - COMPLETE-Mail out for Bond Issue Referendum
8-9-06: George Fogg moved to food a mailing to registered voters inorder to explain the ballot, this will be done by staff.
8-21.06: Staff will coordimte with Committee Chairman Bob Jones for content of mail-out. Man Can will provide !he assistance for
mailing.
9-13-06: MSTU Committee
9-12-06: County Attorney Scott Teach lIld Committee Chainnan sign off on mailing.
9-19-06: Mancan services sent oot mailing.
7
12/12/2007
6 ~
:#:
{
!lO'''~
(F-IO) . COMPLETE - Pump System Repair - Emergency repair afForest Lakes Pump System on 7/28/06.
7-28-06: Florida Irrigation Supply (FIS) repairs pump system for Forest Lakes as an emergency call for $600.00.
&-02-06: Purchase Order issued to FIS for repair cost Invoicing is to Forest Lakes MSTU.
8-10-06: FIS invoice for $800.00 exceeds quote. Staff request FIS to fe-invoice for correct amOlD1t.
(F-9) - ('OMPLETE - Lake # 6- Villas Drainage Improvement - Craig Pager- County Attorneys - To determine if the project scope
is within the authorization of the MSTU Ordinance.
8-23-06: RLS sent to Scott Teach for determination of weather the scope of proposed project is authorized by Fcrest Lakes MSTU
Ordinance.
9-1-06: Liaison Staff receives notification trom Scott Teach that the scope goes beyond what is authorized by Forest Lakes MSTU
Ordinance. Project is not authorized by Forest Lakes MSTU Ordinance as it is not 'roadway related drainage'.
(F-8) COMPLET1:: - Roadway Signage and Pavement Marking Study-
Installation of Signs - COMPLETED - Committee approved for signage-committee chainnan has requested that consultant review
and revise the quantity of signs.
4-17-06; PO issued to Lykins for $12,045.00; Lykins begins work on 4-17-06.
5-15.06 - NTP given- project under construction - estimated to be done 5-20-06
5-24-06-Project Complete-need to have tinal walk-through.
7-18-06 - FrNAL INSPECTION - PROJECT COMPLETE
(F-7) COMPLETE -. Painting of Markings .Quotes requested from new Collier County AnnualContractor Trutwin (Fort Myers
Location).
5-30-06; Quote from Trutwin based on annual contract for traffic markings pending
6-12-06: Trutwini requested new drawings with textthat is legable from Wilson Miller.- no drawings reced.
6-27-06: Submitted PO request on 6-27-06
7-12 -06 : Project completed
(F-6) -COMPLETE- New Committee member selected Mr. Fogg -BCC Approved on 9/13/05
Complete; sec Approved Fogg,
(F-5) COMPI.FTE - SWALE #15 - Kyle Construction 100% complete - need consultant report on final inspection.
4-17-06; Need WilsonMiller notifiQltion of Final Inspeciton.
6/12/06 - Project complete - waiting on WM to submit letter of final completion.
627.06 - Project complete - waiting on WM to submit letter of final completion.
7-12-06 - Craig Pager to meet with Drrryl- final completion documentation
8-7-06: Substantial Completion with Punch-list complete
(F-4) - (:OMPI En: .Swale # 7 & 10 Regrade; WM has completed design. WM completing Bidding with Annuals.
4-17-06; Wark Order for Higgins pending
5-15-06, NTP - 5-8-06 - DN Higgins - Wilson Miler perfanning constIDction observatirn
6-12-06, Construction Reports from Wilson, MiIler- Pending (50% completed)
6-27-06: Waiting on report from Wilson Miler
7-12-06 - Craig Pager to meet with Dtrryl- tinal completion documentation
8-7-06: Substantial Completion with Punch-list complete
(F 3) - l 'OM PI .FTE - Swale # 2 Regrade;m WM has completed design WM completing Bidding with Annuals.
4-17-06; Work Order for Higgins pending
5-15-06, NTP - 5-8-06 - DN Higgins - Wilson Miler perfonning constIDction observatirn.
6-12-06 Completed- need report frcm Wilson Miller
6-27-06 Completed- need report from Wilson Miller
7-12-06 - Craig Pager to meet with Drrryl- final completion docwnentation
8-7-06: Final Completion Document Executed
(F-2) - COMPLLTF - Woodshire Lane Overl~ Project- 1" Overlay of Woods hire Lane. Commttee Approved $48,000.00 for this
project.
5~15-06 - Work Order- picked up by Contractor- waiting tor signature. -Contractor schedule - Mid June to begin.
5-30-06 ; Construction to begin on 5-31-06 field meeting to held.
6-27 -06: Completed- and final inspection requested.
7-12-06 - Craig Pager to meet with Dmyl- final completion docwnentation
8~ 7-06: Final Completioo Docwnent Executed.
(F-I) CnMPL.UT - Pump Generator-
8-9-06 - Committee voted to rent a generator if its needed in an emergency
8
02/04/2008 21:14 2394559556
GGCC
16/A'i 0 PAGE 01.
.1
1""""'Y7,2008
MINUlES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER
'\~' \A___ ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Fiala ---;-:-
Halas <n.c..---~_
~~~~ng~_
Coletta ~-_.__.
Naples, Florida, January 7,2008
RECEIVED
FEB 0 5 2008
Board Of CC~lJnty C(;lllmis~.ioners
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Golden Gate Community
Center Advisory Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted
business herein, met on this date at 6:00 PM in REGULAR SESSION in
Conference Room "e" of the Golden Gate Community Center, 4701 Golden
Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, with the following members present:
CHAIRMAN: Bill Arthur
VICE CHAIR: Jim KIug
Ernie Bretzmann
Vicki Clavelo
Kaydee Tuff
ALSO PRESENT: Ellen R. Barkin, Community Center SUpervisor
Shari Ferguson, Region IT Manager
1
Mise vorres"
Date:.1W.-tiln-
Item#:
~ ':JI:~;1 to
/
02/04/2008 21:14
2394559556
GGCC
16 I Nt O. PAGE .~
1anuary 1. 2008
A. Call to OnIer
The Meeting was caJled to order at 6:05 PM by Chairman Bill Arthur.
B. AQDrcw..1 of ARend.
K4ydee Tuff moved to /#Pp- the ApnJo. Second by Jim Klug. CIlI7'Ied
ullaninunl,ly, 5-9.
C. Aooroval of Medinll Minutes
Jim K1ug requested a change to Item m on page 2. The last sentence in the pa1lIgI'aph
will end at the word, "application."
Kay4ee Tuff moved to appruve tlu M",uta l!ftlle DecMrkr :I, 2007 meetiIfg tl$
amended. &collll by VICki am.elo. C8rried 1IIIIIIIimou$ly, 4-0.
Ernie ~ ablttdtle4 from VOIiIIg tRllce he did IJOt IIIte1ul the December meeti1Jg.
D. Old Business
1) Kitchen Rood Update
Ellen Barkin stated work on the kitchen hood was in progress with only the "finish
work"to be completed.
Chairman Arthur stated he WIIS ll'q)ecting a telephone call from the installers of the
fire !lllJlP<<lSsion system with the date that the system would be ill8ta1led and would
provide the information to Ellen Barkin
E. New Buu_
1) Eleetiou 0(1008 Offirers
Clr.aJnwu. ArlIuIr IWIffiIurtd Jim Kl#g tl$ Chairman for tlte 2008 term. &collll by
Kaydee Tuff.
Jim KIug accepted the nomination with the understanding that he lIlay be traveling
during the summer months.
C8rried IIl1tlnillwluly, 4-0.
Kaydee Tuff aombuded E1'Ifie Bretutuuut 4$ Vrce CIuIir. Second by VICki UIlveIo.
Ernie Bretzmann accepted the nomination and verified that the term would begin with
next month's meeting and nm fur the full calendar year.
C8rried lIIIIlni_ly, 4-0.
Chairman Arthur stated he sent an ema.il to the BCC to lIUggest changing the members'
terms from two-year to staggered 3-year terms and to add an altemate. When he receives
a response, he will forward it to the new Chair.
ElIea Barkin stated she would fotward the names of the new Chair and Vice Chair to
the BCC for approval.
2) Supervilor ffigblighu - Oftemher/Sanuary Programs and Events
· BMX races - December 7'" and 14'" - with a total of 50 participants
· "Walk of Trees" - December 8'" through IS'"
2
02/04/2008 21:14
2394559556
GGCC
16 I A .f 0 PAGE ...j/
IllIIblllY 7, 2008
· Trolley rides - December 15111 - approximately 250 people attended _ Ellen
stated she is considering including trolley rides as part oflarger event for next
year which would allow her to charge a small fee for the rides to off-set the costs
Shari Ferguson said the County has requested each supervisor to review their
department's programs and to compano the revCllUe earned with aSllOciated
expenses; d~isions will be made as to which programs to continue, which to
eliminate, and which to assess a charge. The goal is DOt to make money, but to
be able to support the programs being offered. Those programs which produce a
profit will offset those which do nor.
· "Snow Fest" - December 1" Next year, it may not be "free."
· "Country Jam" will be held at the County Fairgrotmds. Alcohol will be available.
· Bridge Tournament - JanUlU1' 24lh
· "Cool Cmisers Annual Car Show" -lllJ1U81'y 26"" Although it is not a GGCC event,
the sponsor usually makes a large donation to the GGCC after this evem.
· "Bike Fest" - February 9'" and 10'"
· Camps were held over the Christmas holidays with 19 attendees
F. MontbIY Bndtret Renort - EDen Barkin and Shari Fel'JDSOD
The revenue is slightly less than last year's figures. It WllS noted that the Boys &Girls
Club has negatively impacted attendance at GGCC, in addition to tile fact that several
schools now run their own after-school care programs
G. Members Addition. BOd Com.........
Vidd aaveto asked if there was additional information concerning the Metro pes
request regarding a cell tower.
Shari Fergtl$On stated the Bec had requested a proposal from Metro PeS. She is waiting
to hear how the revenue will be alloeated.
Jim KIng suggested each member should present a two or three organizational goals
at next month's meeting, mul he requested allowing approximately 30 minutes for
discussion.
R Inform".". Item.
Ellen Barkin presented a tentative Meeting schedule for 2008. She requested
cancellation of the 1une mlleting instead of the July mlleting due to contlict with the start
of the SlImmer Camp program. Additionally, due to conflict with the Labor Day holiday.
the September meeting will be held on September 2, 2008.
Ernie Bretun4Jfn moved to CIUIcel the Jtme meeting and to hold the July meeting
on July fA. &cotul by VICki OlIVeto. Carried UlUUUlIWllsly, 5.0.
The next meeting II Mooday, Febm..,.. 4, 2008.
3
_._---------_.~-'..,.._-_.....,.~,. "
02/04/2008 21:14
2394559556
GGCC
16 I 4 ,: 0 PAGE 04
Janua.y 7, 2008
'fhere beiD, no fu.......r busID_ fOr the load oflhe County, the Meedna WIllI adjoumed by
order of the CbainnlUl at ':30 PM.
COLLIER COUNTY GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER
ADVlSORY COMMI'ITEE
ft{t:.~~
n- MiIIutes Mn appJ1Wed by the BoanllCommitree Chair 011 (;;1../ If/o 8'
as p_~ V- . or IllI BlDUlded. r .
.
4
----~,_.._._,~-~... -~-~
161
A 11
RECEIVED
,..-._-
I-FH U /'-8
f L,;d
October 17, 2007
8;30am
Career and Seryice Center of Collier County-lmmokalee . ~ . hv/tF
750 South 5th Street Fiala P . " .
. Halas -L.' ...- . .
Immokalee, Flonda, 34142 H '. ~ y -.
ennlnQ_
Coyle _.
MINUTES Coletta _ _ ...'= _'
Immokalee Master Plan and Visioning Committee
P(1..'F-.~ ;.::
(-:::n,rUISSiQp.ers
A. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Fred N. Thomas, Jr. at !OAOAM
B. Roll Call and Announcement of a Ouorum
Advisorv BoardlEZDA:
Present: Fred Thomas, Richard Rice, Bob Soter, Ira Malamut, Denise Blanton,
Eva Deyo, Julio Estremera, RickHeers, Bernado Barnhart, Carol Sykora, and
Caption Tom Davis.
Absent/Excused:, Ana Salazar, Robert Halman, and Floyd Crews. A quorum was
announced as being present.
Immokalee Master Plan and Visionine Committee:
Present: Edward (Ski) Olesky, Fred N. Thomas, Jr., Richard Rice, Clarence A.
Tears, Jr., and Rick Heers.
Absent/Excused: William O'Neill, Leo F. Rogers, Raymond Holland, and Floyd
Crews. A quorum was declared.
Others Present: Robert Grassi, Robert Slate, Brooke Gabrielson, Penny
Phillippi, Patrice Patterson, K.P. Pezeshkan, Jim Coletta, Tammie Nemecke, Susi
Winchell, Essie Serrata, Jacqueline Toemmes, Gene Hearn, Corbett Alday, Bob
Juster, Edward N. Finn and Thomas Greenwood of the Collier County
Comprehensive Planning Department staff.
C. AdOPtion of Agenda. The agenda was approved unanimously upon motion by
Mr. Heers and second by Mr. Olesky with the following agenda additions; item
E3 under the IMPVC agenda an announcement to be made by Bob Juster of TMl
building; Item G3 on the CRA agenda.. ..Brownfield Area designation; and Item
F3 on the EZDA agenda.. ..Brownfield Area designation.
D. Approyal of Minutes of the September 19 and 26, 2007 meetings
The minutes of these meetings were approved as distributed by unanimous vote
upon motion by Mr. Rice and second by Mr. Estremera.
E. Communications (see communications folder at meeting)
1. Brian Goguen of Barron Collier Enterprises: Update on proposed Serenoa
DRI. With Mr. Goguen having a conflict this morning, Mr. Thomas
provided an update with no action taken. Mise Carres : to I k I (
Date:
'tem#:_
\/
1
~oie~ to
161
All
2. CRA 2008-01; Alexandra Sulecki of Conseryation Collier and Possible
Purchase of the Pepper Ranch. This item was discussed by Ms. Sulecki
stating that the owners have approached Conseryation Collier about the
possible sale of the 2500 acre ranch to Conservation Collier.
She stated that she wished to obtain the views and possible support from
this group regarding this proposition. She stated that there are no plans for
the site other than for the possible use for passive recreation (for about 215
acres) and keeping the enyironmentally sensitive lands in that state. The
use of mitigation credits was discussed.
After discussion, a motion was made by Mr. Rice and second by Mr.
Heers that both the IMPVC and the CRA Adyisory Board direct the
President to send letters to both Conservation Collier and to the Board of
County Commissioners in support of this proposal and that mitigation
credits by used somewhere in Collier County and that the proposed use of
the credits be referred to the CRA Advisory Board for recommendation at
a later date. The motion carried unanimously.
3. Announcement bv Mr. Juster of the TMI Building. Mr. Juster announced
that a new national guard armory will locate in Immokalee and also use
some of the space at the airport for the parking/storage of vehicles. The
armory will serve the needs of 5 million residents within a 50 mile radius
and provide for hurricane readiness as well.
F. Old Business
3. CRA 2006-00; Update on Immokalee Area Master Plan Process/LDC
Update Process Mr. Greenwood reported that the 4-person
Comprehensive Planning Department review team is still reviewing the
draft and he has not received any responses from the team, headed by
David Weeks, for further consideration by the Advisory Board and the
IMPVC. Mr. Thomas stated that he had a meeting with the head of the
department and that he would likely be meeting again.
4. Review of IMPVC and CRA Advisory Board Attendance and Possible
Recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. After review of
attendance records during the past year, it was found that IMPVC
members O'Neill and Rodgers missed more than half of the meetings and
more than 2 meetings in a row and in violation of the attendance
requirements outlined in Section 8 of Ordinance No. 2001-55. Upon a
motion by Mr. Rice and second by Mr. Tears, the IMPVC unanimously
directed the Chairman to notify the Board of County Commissioners that
these two positions are declared yacant.
G. New Business
1. CRA 2007-19: Development of a Capital Improvements Plan for the
Immokalee Urban Designated Area to Assist With Implementation of
the lAMP and Update of the Immokalee Component of the Community
2
161
All
Redevelopment Plan. After discussion of the Scope of Services distributed
with the agenda, the fact there would be 4 public meetings before the
Capital Improvement Plan is completed, and that the priorities for capital
improvements will be determined in Immokalee, a recommendation to the
BCC authorize the preparation of a capital improvement plan using the
proposed scope of services and Guardian Community Resources
Management, Inc. (Guardian) was unanimously approved upon motion by
Mr. Olesky and second by the Rice. Corbett Alday of Guardian was
present to answer questions.
H. Citizen Comments. None.
r. Next Meeting Date The next meeting was set for November 14.
J. Adiournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:45am.
MINUTES
Immokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board
A. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 9:45am.
B. Roll Call and Announcement of Ouorum Refer to joint meeting minutes above.
C. Adoption of Agenda Refer to joint meeting minutes above.
D. Approval of Minutes of the September 19 and 26, 2007 meetings. Refer to joint
meeting minutes above.
E. Communications (see communications folder at meeting)
F. Old Business
I. County Code Enforcement Monthly Highlights in Immokalee. Michelle
Arnold, Director of the Code Enforcement Department, stated that there is
a part-time supervisor for Immokalee (has both Golden Gate Estate and
Immokalee) Carol Sykora, and 2 investigators. She stated that a new code
enforcement software is being "rolled out" and will help in enforcement
and that she would be happy to make sure that monthly reports are
provided to the Advisory Board during its monthly meetings. Mr. Thomas
stated that he would like to have reports which indicate symptoms of
problems. No action was taken.
2. CRA 2006-10: Redevelopment of the Farmer's Market No action was
taken.
3. CRA 2006-05; Status of SR 29 Bypass Proiect (Thursday, October 18,
5:30pm "Purpose and Need Scoping Public Meeting" at the One Stop
Career and Service Center) Those present were encouraged to attend.
4. CRA 2006-12; East of 951 Infrastructure and Services Study (Monday,
December 10 at tpm at Career and Service Center). Mr. Rice reported
that the last meeting held earlier this month was largely attended by
Golden Gate Estates property owners and covered fire and EMS services
for the area. The meeting in Immokalee on December 10 will cover
transportation issues.
5. CRA 2007-08; Set UP of Immokalee CRNEZDAlEDC/Chamber/Code
Enforcement Office Set-Up
3
16 I
A 11
-"',
a. Budget Report (FY 07-08). Mr. Thomas requested payment of a
bill from Fund 186 in the amount of $175 to the State of Florida
for a service provided to the CRA. He stated the Bayshore CRA
(Fund 187) has paid for the membership to the Florida
Redevelopment Association which cost $475. Payment was
authorized unanimously upon motion by Ms. Deyo and second
by Ms. Blanton.
b. Office Space Report. Report of Office Space Sub-committee
(Dick Rice) Mr. Rice gaye a report about other office space
(beyond that available for initial temporary use at 310 Alachua
Street). After discussion, unanimous approval was giyen to
county staff, in the interim, to proceed to expend the minimum
necessary funds from Fund 186 to equip and furnish the CRA
office space at 310 Alachua Street so that the Executive Director
can commence work on December 3, following a motion by Mr.
Rice and second by Mr. Estremera.
c. Office Personnel Report. Executive Director Status and/or
Administrative Assistant. A copy of the final draft Employment
Agreement was distributed. It was stated that the new Executive
Director would hired effective on December 3 and would be
responsible for choosing and hiring the Administrative Assistant,
upon the beginning of her tenure as Director.
d. Miscellaneous.
6. Reports on CRNBCC actions taken on Recommendations of the Advisorv
Board
a. CRA 2007-10; Contracts with Guardian Community Resources
Management, Inc. and Summit Professional Services, Inc. No
report other than that they are in effect.
7. CRA 2007-05; New Proiects in the Immokalee Area
· 2007-05(C): Tradeport DRI South of Airport. DRI application is
being reviesed and meetings continue with expected start of
construction in 2008 or 2009.
. 2007-05(G); Family Dollar store (NW comer of Main at 2nd Street,
East. No new report other than under review the second time.
. 2007-05(H); Fiesta 3 (North Side of Boston between 2nd and 3'd
Street). No report other than under review the second time.
8. CRA 2007-11; Progress and Course of Action Regarding Community
Deyelopment Block Grant (FEMA) "Wilma Disaster Recoverv Program"
Round 2 fundin~ in amount of $2.408,025 to assist Low and Moderate
Income Housing with Wind Loss Mitigation Work (tentative plan is to
provide $1 million for "rehablhardening" with emphasis for use in the 2
eRAs) Mr. Heers reported that the funding would be first offered to those
approved preyiously (much of funds are already earmarked for
Immokalee) and any balance would be offered to new applicants.
4
16/
A
, 1
-
G. New Business
1. CRA 2007-15; Discussion of Draft Collier Countv Economic Incentive
Policy Collier Countv Redevelopment Areas This item was discussed in
conjunction with the next agenda item with the following consensus;
· The Immokalee CRA wishes to be a part of the workshop on
January 25, 2008;
· The Economic Incentiye Policy could be part of the workshop
discussion;
· The Immokalee CRA would like to have goal/objective setting
workshop with the new Executive Director prior to the January 25
workshop to develop a basic set of goals and objectiyes for the
fiscal year.
2 CRA Workshop. Discussion of Bayshore/Gateway CRA workshop with
the Community Redevelopment Agency to review its work program for
FY 2007-2008 (information only....January 25, 10;30 to 12:00 in
Administration Building). See above.
3. CRA 2008-02; Robert Slate with Strategic Svstems. Inc. on Behalf of the
Carlisle Development Group: Request Designation of Brownfield Area of
the Crestview. Phases I and 2. Those present heard from Mr. Slate, stating
that the proposed brownfield area is located in the CRA boundary and the
enterprise zone boundary and the designation of the area by the county as
a brownfield area would qualify the owner, the Carlisle Development
Group, for reimbursement of sales taxes on construction materials. Copies
of the site plan for Crestview Phases I and 2 were reviewed along with a
draft Executive Summary and Resolution for the BCC to consider. It was
pointed out that the County attorney has:
· directed that a public hearing be held in Immokalee to consider this
resolution and that the owners of property within 500 feet of the
area be notified as well a notice in the newspaper;
· that a Brownfield review committee be established (it could be the
existing CRA Advisory Board).
Mr. Slate also pointed to other areas, such as Jacksonville and Miami, that
have designated their entire Enterprise Zone as a Brownfield area and that
Collier County should consider this as well as a means to stimulate
economic development and redevelopment.
After further discussion the CRA Advisory Board went on record
unanimously, following a motion by Ms. Blanton and a second by Mr.
Estremera that;
· The CRA Advisory Board recommend to the CRA that the
Advisory Board be the brownfield advisory committee for the
Immokalee CRA area as provided for in Section 376.80(4) of
Florida Statutes;
· That a public hearing be held before the CRA Advisory Board
during its November 14 meeting; and
5
16/
A.11
· That the CRA Advisory Board would like to haye the BCC
consider designating the entire Enterprise Zone as a Brownfield
Area at a later date.
H. Citizen Comments. None
I. Next Meeting Date (November 14,2007 at 8:30am)
J. Adiournment. The meeting was adjourned at !O;15am.
MINUTES
Enterprise Zone Development Agency
A. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 10; 15am.
B Roll Call and Announcement of Ouorum Refer to joint meeting minutes aboye.
C. Adoption of Agenda Refer to joint meeting minutes above.
D. Approyal of Minutes of the September 19 and 26, 2007 meetings. Refer to joint
meeting minutes above.
E. Communications (see communications folder at meeting)
F. Old Business
I. Discussion of Web Page for EntellJrise Zone Development Incentives
and How to Better Communicate the A vailabilitv of these Incentives
hltP://www.colliergoy.net/lndex.aspx.?page= 1596 No discussion.
2. Discussion of Printing of Incentives Brochure Included with Agenda
packet and no discussion.
G. New Business
I. CRA 2008-02: Robert Slate with Strategic SYstems, Inc. on Behalf of the
Carlisle Deyelopment Group; Request Designation of Brownfield Area
of the Crestview. Phases I and 2. Please see discussion under G3 of the
CRA Adyisory Board meeting minutes.
After further discussion the EZDA went on record unanimously,
following a motion by Ms. Blanton and a second by Mr. Estremera that;
· The EZDA recommend to the BCC that the Advisory Board be the
brownfield advisory committee for the Enterprise Zone Area as
provided for in Section 376.80(4) of Florida Statutes;
· That a public hearing be held before the EZDA Advisory Board
during its November 14 meeting; and
· That the EZDA Advisory Board would like to have the BCC
consider designating the entire Enterprise Zone as a Brownfield
Area at a later date.
H. Citizen Comments None
I. Next Meeting (Noyember 14,2007 at 8;30am)
J. Adiournment The meeting was adjourned at !O;30am.
P~epJred by: )> -J.i_ 1 //-- / Y-<.~7
" 7}--~?-C~U?.-P/Yo.li~P
Thomas Greenwood, Principal Planner
Comprehensive Planning Department
6
161 A
* The next joint Advisory Board/EZDA/IMPVC meeting will be held December 19,
2007, at 8:30am at the Career and Seryice Center located at 750 South 5th Street in
Immokalee.
** There is no scheduled IMPVC meeting at this time. Further meetings will be held at
5;30pm at the Career and Service Center located at 750 South 5th Street in Immokalee
and will be appropriately noticed and announced in advance of such meetings.
All meetings will be publicly noticed in the W. Harmon Turner Building (Building F), posted at the
Immokalee Public Library and provided to the County Public Information Department for distribution.
Please call Ekna Guevera, Planning Technician. at 239-659-5749 for additional information. In accordance
with the American with Disabilities Act, persons needing assistance to participate in any of these
proceedings should contact Ekna Guevera, Planning Technician, at least 48 hours before the meeting. The
public should be advised that members of the Immokalee Master Plan and Visioning Committee and the
CRA Advisory Board are also members of the other Boards and Committees, including, but not limited to:
EZDA, lmmokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board, Immokalee Fire Commission, and the Collier
County Housing Authority: etc. In this regard, matters coming before the IMPVC and the Advisory Board
may come before one or more of the referenced Board and Committees from time to time.
7
~\-f
~-t-
f iala -;::::-1,; 1..:...----
Halas ---~
dennlng --ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE/RESCUE
~..,--
';oy\e ORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES
('0Ietl3
'.' JAN. 3, 2008
ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE STATION
161
AI;>
.~
...
ATTENDEES:
Emilio Rodriguez, Fire Chief
Kirk Colvin
Bill Rafeldt, Advisory Board Member
Joseph Langkawel, Advisory Board Member
Thomas Decker, Adyisory Board Member
Barbara Shea, Minutes Preparer
I. CALL TO ORDER
Ted Decker opened the meeting at 6;30 p.m.
II. OLD BUSINESS
A. December 2007 Advisory Board Meeting Minutes
I. Copy of Minutes distributed and approved.
2. Minutes approved by all Advisory Board Members.
3. Kirk Colyin approved and signed Dec. 2007 Minutes.
B. Chiefs Report
I. Discussed monthly calls.
2. Distributed 2007 Annual Report.
a. Highlights of 2007 discussed.
b. Report to be emailed to Kirk for the residents.
III. NEW BUSINESS
A. Consolidation Study Group Operations Committee Report Issued
I. Report was reported to County Fire Chiefs Assoc. Dec. 2007 .
2. Report will be presented to Steering Committee Jan. 2008.
3. Recommends consolidation.
4. BCC has not expressed any opinions.
5. Chief Rodriguez believes an independent consultant analysis is needed.
6. Discusses merger of all 9 fire districts and EMS. Mise Corres I G (A 17-
7. Cities of Marco Island & Naples could each opt out.
Date:
item#'.
J to
161
A
12
~;~
8. Possibility of straw vote in November 2008.
9. Level of services would be enhanced with consolidation.
10. Limited cost sayings would be achieved.
11. Independent unions are in the process of merging.
12. State budget cuts favors the process of consolidation.
13. Implementation of merger estimated to be 5 years.
14. Current millage rates in the county range from .5 to 4 mils.
B. Steering Committee; tentative Jan. 24 meeting.
C. 2008 Fire Season expected to be severe.
I. Less available resources this year.
2. Unknown availability of a helicopter.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7;25 p.m.
Approv
')./~ /63
. (
Date;
161
A12
ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE I RESCUE
ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA
Jan. 3,2008
CHIEF'S REPORT
A. OPERATIONS REPORT
B. VOLUNTEER REPORT
C. TRAINING REPORT
D. BUDGET REPORT
OLD BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
County wide Merger study
BOARD AND CITIZENS' OPEN DISCUSSION
.)
16/
Al,
CIllEF'S REPORT
Dee 31, 2007
OPERATIONS REPORT
Isles 0 f Capri Fire / Rescue personnel provide 24 hour emergency services for the Isles of Capri
commnnity with a consistent average response time 0[3 to 4 minutes. From 8:00 a.m. to 8:00
a.m., a minimum of at least four fully state certified Firefighters are assigned to the fire station.
Additionally, the Isles of Capri Fire / Rescue Department has the only Advanced Life Support
(ALS) equipped boats in Collier County. This means that a medical emergency on the water, be it
a heart attack or trawnatic injury, can be handled with the most advanced emergency care possible
in the field.
The Isles of Capri Fire / Rescue Department welcomes citizens to stop by the station for free blood
pressure checks. We also provide home and condo fire prevention inspections, along with CPR
classes.
"'UPDATES'"
Isles of Capri Fire / Rescue is now an Advanced Ufe Support Provider (partnership with EMS)
. In.Oistrlct
o
o
o
Fire Alarms
Medical Alarms
2
o
Ambulance Calls
Vehicle Accidents
Medical Assists
10
3
o
Haz-Mat Calls
Power Lines Down
o
o
Boat Fire
EMS via water
Dive Rescue
Search & Rescue
Marine Assist
o
2
o
o
o
Public Assists
Move-u
Tech Rescue
o
o
o
Oiit4if~DI$ti1ct I MOiithtvtliiMJ. I' ................YTO......... "1
2 I 2 I 13
0 0 1
0 0 16
28 I 30 I 490
0 0 0
0 I 10 I 141
1 4 14
0 0 0
1 I 1 I 10
0 0 0
9. I 0 I 1
0 2 18
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 I 0 I 15
2 2 28
0 0 0
II 11 I 34 1451747 I
I Total
Note: In-District includes all Marine calls in District 01 (Collier County Waterways)
161
fA 13
CONSERVATION COLLIER
k,,{ \:k LAND ACQUISITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Fiala '. . . February 11, 2008, 9:00 A.M.
Halas .' :~ Commission Boardroom
Henning- ---. Hannon Turner Building (Building "F"), Third Floor
Coyle -~10- __ AGENDA
Coletta --~-- ---
RollCall
Approval of Agenda
Approval of January 14,2008 Minutes
Old Business:
A. Real Estate Services Update - A-list properties
B. Contracts
I. Winchester Head
V. New Business
I.
II.
III.
IV.
l';""~
"
A. Staff Report - BCC- approval of AAl
B. Staff Report - Appointments for Conservation Collier Committee
C. Letter of Thanks to CREW Trust for Starnes Partnership
D. Cycle 6 applications
E. Outreach Subcommittee Recommendation for Cycle 6 Target Areas
F. Outstanding Advisory Committee Member Program
G. Advisory Committee Service Awards
H. Coordinator Communications
VI. Subcommittee Meeting Reports
A. Outreach - Tony Pires, Chair
B. lands Evaluation and Management - Kevin Kacer, Chair
C. Ordinance Policy and Procedures - Will Kriz, Chair
VII. Chair Committee Member Comments
VIII. Public General Comments
IX. Staff Comments
X. Adjourn
******************************************************************************************************
Committee Members: Please notify Alexandra Sulecki at 252-2961 no later than 5:00 p.m. on
February 8. 2008 if YOU cannot attend this meetina.
Mj" .rres Iltl Pr \'7:.
Date
item #
;) tG
/
V'
~lala ~~ ~-- E[
~~~~ngf~~ ESTATES BEAUTIFICATION MSTU
c:;oletta ~,-,,&l_:_- ADVISORY COMMITTEE
2885 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, FI 34104
161
r~E:'
~ llri~
A If~' ,I
r~)
y.
(.ou.!~
1~r.iil n c.;"
,''.1 r,:v ~ .',~~ rn (')1 ;:::,: :)~: '2.r~;,
January 17,2008
AGENDA
I. Call Meeting to Order
II. Attendance
III. Approval of Agenda
IV. Approval of Minutes: December 20, 2007
V. landscape Maintenance Report - ClM
VI. landscape Architect's Report - Michael McGee
A. Doral Survey re-guarding Fence I new fence design with cost
estimates
VII. Budget Report
A. Budget Committee -Caroline Soto & Bob Cole
VIII. Transportation Operations Report
A. Project Manager's Report - Darryl Richard
B. Report re meeting with owner of Doral corner lot I re fence options
IX. Housekeeping Items
A. Rip rap repair on St. Andrew Blvd. near Cypress Gate Condominiums
X. Committee Reports
XI. Old Business
A. Future Beautification Project List
B. Vehicle Accident Report at front entry on 9-20-07 at 3:30 P.M.
C. Damage to rip-rap placed on drainage canal bank by Cypress Lake
condominium
XII. New Business
A. Grants - Therese Stanley
Mise Corres:
Dalej'lP} \\ \ 4-
XIII. Public Comments
item#:
XIV. Adjournment
:"Jy;to
j
The next meeting is scheduled for February 21, 2008 4:00 p.m.
Collier County Transportation Building/East Conference Room
2885 Horseshoe Drive South, Naples, FL 34104
16 ! A 14
"....~
.....
o
o
::::l N
N
1-11)0
CI)_N
:EO'"
:>-ZGl
.J::::l.c
wu..E
.J Gl
U
Gl
o
1: ~'"
4: g' C-
oo .- (
? t::
"- '"
o E
::>_ OJ
,J,.. 0:: IJ) (;f) (I) IF' (I' tn ll! UI I:h V; If, \.0 V! tA- lj)
ii..,
".-
.....
~D..
..
o
r.:
c:
&E
O~
I"---f'.NOC\lgoo
(O'I"'""......C\l1l) ......0
....:r....:r....:-.i-~cicoo
COOCOf'.COQ('t)(")
(")ll) mf'.'If"IOOCl
cri ..j
oeo
"'.....
:gg
~'"
"":or:i
tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-ththfFttA-tA-tA-tA-tA--
""J U
(r: c"
, c (j ;:: 0 .'
(:~; C () "" "'
c.- 0 1;') r: ,.; ~,
c. ,-.J '" 0'
" '. ~ v:: ..... -
, , \b
,'.i
,.~,
"<J' ,-,
c
(~
,,-,:,
a:;
-E . c:
Qi"cuc
~Q)~'m ~O)cno> ~
CJ)Q):;: roccc 2:
0. '- .?;> ~'c 0.. oc.."o..... ::J
0)00 rl .!!1 '0 c: '" rJ rl rl Q) CJ)
c: ~Q) cn.::&:.co;;: roG) fJ) (I) r.n.~ Q)J::
:.;:::l "OcoU........-o"o-o-::::oo
c: 16 c 'C "5 Q) ~ 0 c c c: t:: c: c
(t~~c%~mE~5~.5~.f~
~"'O ~ CO tJ)..J
::>ee.... CD uoo ..!Be(
CIJ >,j.25 c: S;~~ .~1-
E E_mVJ <.'JC1> [j)(I)U) QI-O
ca :JCOe>Q) <(<(<(0)-00
z O"e"En:: 80cdoOEg<(
.... OQ)-~ CCQ)Q)Q):J-
CD~iiiE~1ii e~lDQ)Q)O""""~
"C '0= Eo.: Q)..J:J cGc)C> cn- m
i Q)ooooa..CI)rouooes:~
>(jOOU::LLu..E~~:?!:::2n.a::(()
SOf'-NCO~CONSOOg gCOOOOCOM
1l)lJ)('t)'I"'""......MNMOOV f'-OOO'lf"M
~ .....................
~_~affi~o~~~g~~~~~g8g~~~
IV J!I co~ ,.... N <0_ ~ M N.. CT.I. CO ....._ i25~ ._," o. m. v. o. 0>. N. co.
~..-oo N...... M...... ~MIf'-v,....ll)cnll)lO
>t-O moo..... - N
_ N 'I"'"" N C\I -
- - - --
00 0
00 0
cici 0
00 0
CO 0 0_
IDO N
~ ~
16/
A
14
...
...
N
...
II>
,..:
...
...
...
N
...
II>
,..:
...
eo.......,
"'.., 0)
oj.na:i
.....""'"
oo~
~NM
0"'og08.....,.....8g
CX)NO 0 "l:tCOO
,.;.,..: o~. g'g'.o"':"": 00
"''''0 N~"'OO
co..-Il) U')U)..-......cococo
ri~.,.:NN~~I6ll'ill'i
(f) "l:t"l:t NN ..-..-
NN
uttltfF.H:A'ut~ tltuttlttlttlt tit
tltuttlt~~~m~uttlttlttlttlttlttlt~ut~~tIt~tlttlt~tltw
.,88t:'NCOIOCON Oeo
fLOO)C")..-......COC\l(f)
_:sNMaj..q:cicrici""': ,..:
ta_<c-OCO(f) .....C")co .....
.a:atq,t;,~co. ..-~~N. CD
ucO) N C") (f) ct.
c(CP~ - t:. -
..
LLI~tIt~~~..,.EA-EA-tltEA-ChW
O)CON......ONO
C"),.....LOCOO......N
cicO......:r--:ci""':..q:
m~CX)COO<D......
mLO......M"l:t 0)
-.irIS -.:i
00
....'"
IDcO
..,0
"'~-
EA-EA-~~~~~EA-~EA-~tIt~EA-EA-~_~~EA-fiEA-EA-0EA-tIt
J!l
c:
.,
S
"E
E
o
oEA-~~~
6"
o
"O...ci
~CPo
C "0 N.
",,0
~m~
EA-EA-~tIt
8
g
N
c:i
.....
~
I- 0 Z
I-OwO:Ozwel
~~ ~j~~~~~~
r5;:;;w ~80;:;;;:;;~~00>1
Z ::l 00 w
5 0: -0:; - X 0: 0: 0: :; :; 00 0:.
...Joml-<(I-u.u.>>cnl-
<c-,CJ)ZI-CJ)o:o:O:O:o:CJ)
>~f-~I-WWWOOww
cn....:::cn::>u.LJ...LJ...u.u.~
OOWI-WzCJ)CJ)>->-CJ)O~
<Cc(O:CJ)O:wzZO:O:Z"'i<<
o:-,www>-O:;-O:;O:O:-O:;<.'J~
:J wI-> I- wo:o: -0:; c( 0: w: .
oO~~~O:I-I-OOI-Z
"-'
o
o
0'
{!:, C
('.i 0;,
r'-! l,
('001
C, C)
g ~~;~;
Ci C'J r'j
o CD G'
tD "<j. CC
':---,!'J
,-_.- (:'"
:C "-.l
C:-, (;C
:~ ~;
lD ''.i
~.j" lr,
c': !,
~0m~~lnU)~~0fnmm~W~W0t1tEA-fiEA-~
0000000000000
0000000000000
ci 0 g. ci ci 0 ci ci ci ci ci g' 0
00 00000000 0
"l:tOOOO"l:tOOCOOlOOO
"':u1~cDcD ~Nu:iO cD~~
N...... ...............
...J - cnW C/)
:J-o:;-, -0:; -,OO:J
ml-<c -';:;; -o:;ZZO
::!!(5:J o:~;:;; ii:c(iiiW
W I- W W WZ Z
O:CJ)o:Qo ~WI- f-WO:",;:;;
WWI-O<C w(5CJ) -o:;I-O...JW
:I:WCJ)ZO: >- ~ZO-':I:
I-U.O-f->-CJ)<.'JCJ) ~<(ZWO
O<.'Jolt'Z!::OWo: It';:;;<cgm
8J~1-c(82~~~ c(<.'J<.'J:Effi
wtifrlgo:g:O:c(><::I:g~~O::I:
LL>a:::ClWOWa:~OOI-I-WI-
<.'J 0: Ci Z :I: W I;;: 1il a: -':J Z :I:<.'J ~ :I: a:
Z:J .,.1--'- 0- .,. a:I-W
WCJ)~...JOW~~CJ);:;;...J::JO-Ou.
.....N(f)<Q'lt)fD....COcn~::~::?:~~~~~
O.....N(")<Q'lt)fD....CO
NNNNNNNNN
EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-WEA-fiEA-WEA-WW~EA-WEA-WEA-EA-tltEA-EA-EA-EA-EA-
o ~
"''''
0")<.0
(); M
1'_ ......
<.0
~
~
ogogogo08og
o 0 0 00 0
ggRgggggggsi
.....colOU)U)i2SNCOC5coCD
<<S.....~~NNN<<Sm.o..o
...... v"l:t NN .....-
~NN
w
0: -' <.'J
W 0 0::0 Z
CJ)Z 0 0-0 1=
<.'JZW ~ O-Ol-Z
ZW<.'J>-Z <CI-CJ)O
iili~~~~i!~:1
~~~~~~~~~~~I
OO::!!O 1-1- mml- a: 0::.'"
gj~:;;~;:1~~~l:;~~~
Page lof3
161
n 14
...
.~
From: lulich_P
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 20072:00 PM
To: riley-m
Cc: RichardDarryl; ftagg_d; DeniseWeaver; MoreraJorge; sillery_t; nabizad_s; BetancurNatali
Subject: Lely Golf Resort / Doral Circle Buffer Proposal
Mitch,
This is the initial review of the Rattlesnake Hammock plans submitted by McGee &
Associates, Lely MSTU.
Sincerely,
Pam
REVIEW:
The plan sheet is a proposal by the Lely MSTU to buffer or screen an area on Rattlesnake
Hammock and put a buffer which does not exist along an existing wooden fence.
1. Follow the LDC for Buffer Yards.(See Below.)
2. The property line, right of way lines, fence layout are unreadable. The line weight is
all the same. The scale needs to be larger so that it can be read.
3. Remove any plantings on private property, if the County will be maintaining the
proposed planting.
4. Provide a detail of the proposed wall or fence;
a. Detail of the design height, larger plan view, elevation with heights indicated.
b. Cannot place a wall in the center line of the swale.
5. What is the irrigation source? Are you proposing to tap into the existing irrigation
line? Will the existing irrigation source handle this? Is there room on the controller
for another zone?
6. Stormwater engineering plans are required. A cross-section of the swale area is
required. Elevations of the bottom of the swale and drainage direction.
7. Plant selection:
a. Along the sides of the right of way, the foxtails are declining and we are
planning to remove them. Please propose a native plant that can adjust to the
existing conditions, rock base, high water ph. We are finding that the sabals
and native palms do better than the foxtail.
i. Select another palm.
b. Bouganvilleas are not the appropriate plant for a swale.
C. Are the conditions too wet for dwarf firebush.
d. Plants appear to be on the wrong side of the fence.
7. Remove the shadows from the plan.
Table of buffer yards.
Types of buffers. Within a required buffer strip, the following alternative shall be used
12/20/2007
161
based on the matrix in table 204. A 1 4
1. Alternative A: Ten-foot-wide landscape buffer with trees spaced no more than 30
feet on center.
When a Alternative A buffer is located within a residential PUD and adjacent to a lake, the
required trees may be clustered on common property lines to provide views. Clustered
tree plantings shall not exceed 60 feet between clusters.
2. Alternative B: Fifteen-foot-wide, 80 percent opaque within one year landscape
buffer six feet in height, which may include a wall, fence, hedge, berm or combination
thereof, including trees spaced no more than 25 feet on center. When planting a hedge, it
shall be a minimum of ten gallon plants five feet in height, three feet in spread and
spaced a maximum four feet on center at planting.
When a Alternative B buffer is located within a residential PUD and adjacent to a lake, the
required plant materials may be clustered to provide views. Clustered tree plantings shall
not exceed 60 feet between clusters and the clustered hedge plantings can be provided as
a double row of shrubs that are a minimum of 30 inches in height. When the adjacent lake
exceeds 1500 feet in width the hedge planting shall not be required.
3. Alternative C: 20-foot-wide, opaque within one year, landscape buffer with a six-
foot wall, fence, hedge, or berm, or combination thereof and two staggered rows of trees
spaced no more than 30 feet on center. Projects located within the Golden Gate
Neighborhood center district shall be exempt from the right-of-way requirement of a six-
foot wall, fence, hedge, berm or combination thereof. These projects shall provide a
meandering Type D landscape buffer hedge. In addition, a minimum of 50 percent of the
25-foot wide buffer area shall be composed of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground
covers other than grass.
4. Alternative D; A landscape buffer shall be required adjacent to any road right-of-
way external to the development project and adjacent to any primary access roads
internal to a commercial development. Said landscape buffer shall be consistent with the
provisions of the Collier County Streetscape Master Plan, which is incorporated by
reference herein. The minimum width of the perimeter landscape buffer shall vary
according to the ultimate width of the abutting right-of-way. Where the ultimate width of
the right-of-way is zero to 99 feet, the corresponding landscape buffer shall measure at
least ten feet in width. Where the ultimate width of the right-of-way is 100 or more feet,
the corresponding landscape buffer shall measure at least 15 feet in width, Developments
of 15 acres or more and developments within an activity center shall provide a perimeter
landscape buffer of at least 20 feet in width regardless of the width of the right-of-way.
Activity center right-of-way buffer width requirements shall not be applicable to roadways
internal to the development.
a. Trees shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center in the landscape buffer
abutting a right-of-way or primary access road internal to a commercial development.
b. A continuous three gallon double row hedge spaced three feet on center of at least
24 inches in height at the time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height
within one year shall be required in the landscape buffer where vehicular areas are
adjacent to the road right-of-way, pursuant to section 4.06.05 CA.
c. Where a fence or wall fronts an arterial or collector road as described by the
transportation circulation element of the growth management plan, a continuous three
gallon single row hedge a minimum of 24 inches in height spaced three feet on center,
shall be planted along the right-of-way side of the fence. The required trees shall be
located on the side of the fence facing the right-of-way. Every effort shall be made to
undulate the wall and landscaping design incorporating trees, shrubs, and ground cover
into the design. It is not the intent of this requirement to obscure from view decorative
elements such as emblems, tile, molding and wrought iron.
Page 2 00
"\'11
12/20/2007
16l
A 14 page3~3
d. The remaining area of the required landscape buffer must contain only existing
native vegetation, grass, ground cover, or other landscape treatment. Every effort should
be made to preserve, retain and incorporate the existing native vegetation in these areas.
Pam~I"lLuj~_h, RLt-~A~l.A
Landscape Operations Manager
Collier County Transportation Division
Alternative Transportation Modes Department
2885 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, Florida 34104
Tele: (239) 530-6291
Fax: (239) 213-5899
(lgmlu Ii ch@colli ergov .net
12/20/2007
AG.TRONIX
SPf.CIAUZIIIG 1M MaroRoIJ, IRIiGAIIOlI COMTIlOl S'mEMs
1304 N. 15th STREET
IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142
239-657-5519
161 A 14
QUOl A liON/PROPOSAL
DATE
QUOTE NO.
10/22/2007
815
CUSTOMER NAME
Collier County DOA lMffransportation
2885 HorsesIDe Drive South
N .ples, FI. 34104
TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT
Net 30 SI.:r
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL
2. Scorpio AC 16 Station wlRadio in Stainless Steel
Enclosure
F2848A UHF(450.470MHz) Scorpio AC 2io/8out w/ H1750 2 1,325.00 2,650.00
Radio
FLN2154A Scorpio AC I/O Expansion Kit 2 225.00 450.00
F2805A Scorpio V2 AC 2 io/8 out 2 800.00 1,600.00
800-0365 12v Power Supply LDA50F 4.3amp 2 100.00 200.00
800-7106 H-IN-5 AC Po""r Cable 2 0.00 0.00
800-7111 H.OU-9 DC Power Cable 2 0.00 0.00
SB-18SS SS Enclosure 18W X 36H X 12D 2 1,290.00 2,580.00
PED-18SS SS Pedestals 18W X 12H X 10D 2 375.00 750.00
MLB-8-AC Surge Protector AC 2in/8out 4 266.50 1,066.00
85836 Low Profile Ant UHF 450-470 MHZ 2 90.00 180.00
51020-WM Leviton Surge Protection 2 189.00 378.00
8299-AW GFI WISwitch Leviton (l5Amp) 2 39.00 78.00
T.II Single Gang Box 2 3.99 7.98
Thank you for)Qur business. TOTAL
$9,939.98
QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS.
SIGNATURE
AG.TRONIX
SPECWJZliIIN MoToRolA IRIlllAnON CONTROL S1mIIs
1304 N. 15th STREET
IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142
239-657-5519
161 "
QUOT A TION/PR~P~~L
DATE
QUOTE NO.
10/22/2007
816
CUSTOMER NAME
Collier County DOA 1M!fransportation
2885 Horsesroe Drive South
Naples, FI. 34104
TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT
Net 30 SLT
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL
1.Scorpio DC 8 Station wlRadio in Green Steel Powder
Coated Enclosure
F2948A UHF(450-470MHz) Scorpio DC 21N180UT I 1,360.00 1,360.00
MLB-8-DC Surge Protector DC 2 1N/8 OUT I 241.00 241.00
34962 Sunsaver 6 Voltage Regulator I 50.00 50.00
IS-SC02 Enclosure w/Hood, backpanel, w120W Solar Panel! UHF 1 1.980.00 1,980.00
Antenna, wlMounting Template
710-1300 12v Battery (25AH) Sealed I 89.00 89.00
Note: This enclosure has solar panel built inside.
It's been a pleasure working with you! TOTAL
$3,720.00
QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS.
SIGNATURE
AG.TRONIX
SPICIAlJZJNG IN MOTOROlA IRRItATION CONTROl. SlSTEiIs
1304 N. 15th STREET
IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142
239-657-5519
.161 A 14
QUOTATION/PROPOSAL
DATE
QUOTE NO.
10122/2007
817
CUSTOMER NAME
Collier County DOA 1M!fransportation
2885 Horsesme Drive South
Naples, FI. 34104
TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT
Net 30 SLT
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL
I-Scorpio OC 8 Station w/Radio in Stainless Steel
Enclosure
F2948A UHF(450-470MHz) Scorpio DC 2IN180UT I ] ,360.00 1,360.00
MLB-8-DC Surge Protector DC 2 IN/8 OUT ] 241.00 241.00
34%2 Sunsaver 6 Voltage Regulator ] 50.00 50.00
SB-18SS SS Enclosure 18W X 36H X 12D I 1,290.00 1,290.00
PED-18SS SS Pedestals 18W X 12HX IOD 1 375.00 375.00
BSP2012 20Wart Solar Panel 1 2]9.00 219.00
SPBMD Solar Parel Bracket I 55.00 55.00
85836 Low Profile Ant UHF 450-470 MHZ 1 90.00 90.00
710-1300 12v Battery (25AH) Sealed I 89.00 89.00
Collier County standard cabinet wi solar panel mount
It's been a pleasure working with you! TOTAL
$3,769.00
QUOlE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS.
SIGNATURE
l6t
A14
II
Commercial Land Maintenance
Full Service Landscape Management
3980 Exchange Ave. . Naples. FL 34104
Offfce: (239) 643.6205 . Fax: (239) 643.5012
E-mail: commland@aoJ.com
INVOICMO.
1005963
CUSTOMER NO,
BILL TO:
Collier County Dept 01 TranalNoWiun
3311 Eat T...... TnIiI
NIIplu, A 34tf2
LeIy - 04-3171
lEL Y CONS1RUCllON DAMAGE TO IRRlGA1l0N
REPORTED BY BOB SlEBODNlK 11-26-07
2
IrriglIIion Technician Supervisor l.lIbor to Iroubluhoot
conllruclion dBmllll8d irriglIIion. Replaced damaged
irrlgIIIion heads and leak in pipe . Test sylIlem.
57.64
115.28
2
Irrigation T echnicilln Labor to al8illt with repairs
38.81
n.62
hi'! ." '\'1;... 1\.,
".,. ,~,
~-a
U \l\
~, "'.0_,
,}" -
r r- ,'~" ~~ .
R~~CEIVE
TOTAL
$192.
\.'
" n 2007
Transportation
Services Division
THANK YOU! WE APPRECIATE YOUR BUSINESS
PLEASE NOTE PAYMENT TERMS ON REVERSE SIDE
1.5% WILL BE ADDED MONTHLY TO ALL INVOICES OVER 30 DAYS UNTIL PAID
December 20, 2007
161
;t14
Prepared by:
Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes
Tessie Sillery, Operations Coordinator, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes
Lely MSTU Project Status
(L-43) : ACTIVE- (pac Danyl Richard) Doral Circle and Rattlesnake Hammock Wall and
Landscaping Conceptual Design
11-7-07: WO # TLO-MA-3614-08-02 - $ 2, 490.00 for this project- WO in process of requesting signatures,
12-4-07: PO Issued and WO approved,
12-20-07: Initial plan review received by Pam Lulich, RLA, plans require revision,
(L-41): ACTIVE -(PaC: ressic Sillery): - McGee & Assoc. Annual Contract: 04-3614
10-9-07: Committee approved McGees proposal for $8,525,00
10-24-07: Work Order in progress
11-6-07: County staff requested changes in the proposal.
11-9-07: Work Order in progress for signatures
12-4-07: PO Issued and WO approved,
(L-39) - - ACTIVE {POC: Danyl Richard); Irrigation Refurbishment Project
9-20-07: Committee requosted for Roger Dick - County Irrigation Project Mgr. to attend next meeting,
10-18-07: Requested for estimates per Roger & McGee (team work)
11-7-07: Roger will review and attend the next Lely Meeting with quotes
12-10-07: Still reviewing pricing from AGTRONIX,
12-20-07: quote for project by CLM is pending; additional information plans/specifications requested by CLM,
Confirmation of Ag- Tronix quotes by McGee pending,
(L- 38) - ACTIVE (POC: DalTyl Richard): Palm Tree Replacement Project - medians 4 to 10 median tips
9-20-07: Committee requested CLM to quote project and discuss at next meeting,
10-16-08: CLM submitted estimates for upcoming meeting,
10-18-07: Committee, staff and Mcgee discussed quotes and requested clarification,
11-7-07: Danyl and Jim (CLM) will be meeting on 11-8-07 to review project.
11-15-07: Project approved by committee and staff - contractor to proceed with annual contract,
(L-34) - ACTIVe: (Pac: I c"ic Siilery); Ongoing Maintenance Contract: Commercial Land Maintenance;
Contract 04-3676 "Lely Golf Estates MSTU Roadway Grounds Maint." To Commercial Land Maintenance, Inc,
- Bid # 04-3676 - plus 3 renewals. - expires on 9-28-08
10-12-07: New Fiscal Year 07-08 - PO issued and NTP given,
(L-37) - ACTIVE - POC- (Tessie Sillery) : Bench Facing Lake Project
8-17-07: Committee requested for McGee & Commercial Land to go ahead and do the work, Bench with pavers,
8-22-07: Concept drawings due Sept, 20th for the committee,
9-20-07: McGee did not have drawings completed and will submit drawings to next meeting with costs for wall
in order for committee to make decision on other projects,
10-18-08: Committee requested clarification of quote,
10-24-07: Pending CLM revising and Clarifying Quote
11-7-07: Darryl and Jim (CLM) will be meeting on 11-8-07 to review project,
11-14-07: Quote for Bench received - Swartz $ 793,80
11-15-07: Committee approved and bench is on order.
12-20-07: Bench order is pending delivery to CLM
(L-40) - COMPLETE ! POC: Darryl Richard): - Lift Station Beautification (Baltusrol Course Crossing)
9-20-07: Committee approved up to $3,000 for work to be completed by CLM,
10-16-07: CLM submitted estimate - $ 3,789.30 - over limit committee motioned,
1
161
A 14
10-18-07: Committee approved quote,
10-18-07: Committee requeste McGee to do design,
11-7-07: Danyl and Jim (CLM) will be meeting on 11-8-07 to review project.
12-10-07: Utilities to address beautification,
(L-42): COMPLETE - n (POC: Darryl Richard)- Rip Rap- by Cypress Lake Condominium
10-16-07: Committee requested Road and Bridge to put rip rap on bank,
12-10-07: Repaired and completed,
(L-36) - COMPLETE -(POC: Darryl Richard); Doral Entrance Enhancements & Wall/Fence Project;
Lely MSTU - Survey by RWA at Doral Circle
PHASE Slart - End Date
NTP CONST 9/24/2007
60 Day Const 11/23/2007
Project COMPLETE
11/23/2007
11/7/07 Rec'd
survey
7-19-07: Committee approves $5,000.00 for survey of project area, Ball Park Cost provided from McGee
indicates $25,000 Landscaping; $80,000 for wall; and $40,000 for a fence (on top the wall); Total Project is
estimated as: $145,000,00 Committee Chair will contact Lely Civic Association for cost sharing for this project.
8-16-07: Update: RWA gave estimate for $ 7,900,00 and from staff recommendation for mstu members to make
an amendment to previous motion from $5,000, to $7,900,
8-17 -07: Committee requested to cut down on the size of the parameters for the fence to go up and no more than
$5,000 to spend on survey, - Also, looking at County paying (rattlesnake hammock funds) for the maintenance
(Pam Lulich attended meeting and gave other landscape options) wall vs landscaping
8-22-07: Received estimate at $4,900 from RWA and will work order in process,
9-7-07: Rec'd WO from Vendor and in Work Order Process for additional signatures,
9-20-07: Rec'd PO
9-24-07: NTP - start date 9-24-07 and Completion date: 11-23-07 - PO # 4500084146 - Dated 9-20-07)
WO # RWA-Ff-3944-07-O 8 - "Contract 06-3944 Annual Contract For Roadways"
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
(L-33) - COMPLETE {POC: Darryl Richard); Doral Circle Entry Feature Development; Includes installation
of fence along Rattlesnake Hammock Road and adjoining entry features,
5-17-07: Committee votes to commit $2,500 in consulting fees to McGee for project. McGee will bring
recommendations to 6-21-07 regular meeting,
6-15-07: Project Complete
(L-22) - COMPLETE-(POC: Darryl Richard); (PROJECT PRIORITY #4 AS PER 11-17-06 MEETING)
Angnsta Bonlevard at Forest Hill Planting Project -
SCHEDULE:
Lely MSTU: Augusta at Forest Hill- Landscape & Irrigation
PHASE Start - End Date
Committee Approval for Hannula quote 4/19/2007
BCC APPR Not Required (105 K estimate by McGee)
NTP CONST 5/11/2007
60 DAY Substantial Completion 7/1112007
90 DAY CONST 5/11/2007-8/1012007
CONST-COMPLETE 8/10/2007
Status: Mike McGee has completed 100% plans for project; Presentation to Golf Course Management resulted in
positive approval for project; Waiting on cost estimate from McGee & Associates,
2
161
A14
lI!I!I
5-30-06; Drawings dated 7/14/05 received from McGee; - Project will be scheduled for construction after phase 11
is completed,
7-18-06: Committee has placed project on hold until phase 1I completes,
8-22-06: Project is on hold with 100% plans approved by Golf Course and MSTU Committee,
11-16-06: Committee reviewed plans and McGee provided cost estimate of $30,000,00 for total project. MSTU
Commitment for project estimated by McGee as $15,000,00; Committee Action is required to move project
forward,
12-14-06: MSTU Committee selects to include golf cart crossing area into project.
1-17-07: Meeting with Golf Course Superintendent Allan Cooper to review project.
1-18-07: Golf Course Superintendent is reviewing project. Portion of project is outside of ROW, Portion of
project outside of ROW requires Landscape Maintenance Agreement. One (I) Spare valve is available for use by
the MSTU for project.
2-14-07: Request for Quote sent out- deadline March 9th, 2007
3-15-07: Committee to review quotes and select lowest quote,
4-10-07: Hannula is apparent low quote - Committee approval pending for $25,908,81
4-17-07: Committee approved for Hanula to do the job,
4-30-07: PO Request in process
5-11-07: Notice to Proceed sent to Hannula, Field meeting scheduled for May 22,2007, Meetings to re-occur
each week on Tuesday's
(L-32)- COMPLETE --{POC: Tessie Sillery ); Refurbish entrance sign - damaged by fallen palm at St. Andrews
Sign.
4-17-07: Committee approved for Lykins PO to be opened to repair sign, Committee asked for more information
on deflector plates,
5-17-07: Commitment from Lykins was to be complete by May 11,2007 inspection pending today's drive-
through,
5-17-07: Project Complete
(L-29) -{:OMPLETE --{POCo Tessie Sillery) - Median Re-Painting By Road & Bridge; As per Committee
Request on 11-16-06 Road & Bridge needs to paint "4" numbers at each median opening,
12-20-06: No action taken by Road & Bridge to date, Road & Bridge contacted pertaining Committee request to
paint curbing,
2-14-07: Painting not done by Road & Bridge
3-15-07: R&B supervisor (Don) will meet with staff to make sure the location of #'s
4-17-07: Meeting with Road & Bridge crew to start project on April 23, 2007 with Don Champlin,
4-30-07: Completed
(L-30) - COMPLETE - (Pac: Tessie Sillery) Flag Pole Pole Maintenance - Committee requested staff to
replace American Flag,
1-17-07: Facilities Maint. will replace flag today
1-18-07: Flags replaced
1-18-07: Committee requested for a different size flag
1-23-07 : Requested quote from Lykins
2-10-07: Single quotes and quotes for two for the committee to approve
2-15-07: Committee requested Tessie purchase flags through internet
3-10-07: State Flag and American Flags purchased (2 of each) $187,00
3-15-07: Flags arrived today..,!!!
3-17-07: Flags installed - re-order will be on an as needed basis, County replacement flag is on order.
(L-25) -COMPLETE ~POC Darryl Richard): (PROJECT PRIORITY #3 AS PER 11-17-06 MEETING) Pebble
Beach Blvd, Golf Cart Crossing Area Improvements
10-19-06: Committee directs Committee Chairman Bob Slebodnik to meet with Golf Course to determine if
project is agreeable to Golf Course Management for Construction,
3
16' -.,oA 14
11-17-06: Committee Approved McGee & Associates Concept Based on Foxtail Palm installation, McGee &
Associates to provide one signed and sealed plan and one reproducible not signed and sealed.
12-18-06: Quote for $10,801.94 received from Commercial Land Maintenance,- on hold until see below
12-18-06: Quote from CLM is approved for $10,801.94 under terms of annual contract.
1-17-06: Staff notified that existing irrigation is insufficient for project. Alternative solutions under review by
McGee,
2-15-07: Requirments for project are: (I) need 2 separate valves for irrigation on each side of road; (2) need
confmnation of energized mainline 24 hrs a day; (3) need Golf Course to relocate existing irrigation heads; Bob
Slebodnick will contact Al Cooper and schedule a meeting time for follow-up,
3-14-07: Golf Course installing irrigation - 50% complete
4-10-07: Project Complete
(L-24) -COMPLETE ,POCo Darryl Richard); - (PROJECT PRIORITY #2 AS PER 11-17-06 MEETING)
DORAL CIRCLE LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND LIGHTING PROJECT - Need Committee Action for
award of quote
6-15-06; Quotes received, issues with quotes and discrepancies identified, Committee requested that staff re-quote
project with clarification conceming the discrepancies,
6-27-06: Waiting on quotes,
7-18-06: Need a bi<I-lal> Schedule from McGee & Associates and electrical engineering
8-17-06: Quotes from Annual Contractors for Electrical Installation/Design is pending.
8-21-06: Meeting with Bernie Sinunonds to answer questions regarding quote request.
8-21-06: Owner of Kent Technologies Thom Esch office visit. Thom receives updated copy of plans,
8-22-06: Quotes from Annual Contractors is pending, Due date is August 29, 2006,
8-31-06: Vendors contacted regarding quote: Kent confmns that they will quote, Simmonds will get back to staff
on 9-1-06,
9-3-06: E,B, Simmonds Electrical quote received for $15,725,00 total electrical installation, Poles By County,
9-5-06; Bid Schedule revised and sent out.
10-19-06: Committee directs staff to obtain additional quotes, E,B, Simmonds quote rejected by Committee,
Request for break-down of each line item from E,B, Simmonds,
10-30-06: E.B. Simmonds request meeting with Mike McGee and Staff to review project and quote,
11-7-06: E,B. Simmonds meets with Liaison Staff and reviews original quote, Project is re-quoted for $10,350,00
Committee Approval Required,
11-16-06: Lumec Sales Representative Ron Steedman confirms quote of $2,500 per light for a total of $5,000,00
Committee Approval Required,
11-17-06: Committee Approved E,B, Simmonds for $10,350,00; Approved $5,000,00 for Lumec; Approved
$6,025,00 for Commercial Land Maintenance or other Contractor (ck with Purchasing),
12-20-06: Light Poles are on order, upon receipt E.B. Sinunonds will begin electrical work, followed by
Commercial Land Maintance installation of irrigation and landscaping,
1-17-07 : Light poles are due to be delivered on March 2,2007 pending, PO Issued to EB Simmonds for
Electrical, PO Issued to CLM for landscape project; After receipt of light poles EB Simmonds will install.
3-9-07: Received Lumec Poles for project
3-14-07: Poles picked up by EB Sinunons
3-20-07: Electrical Installation Completed by E,B. Sinunonds
4-10-07: Project Completed
(L-32) - COMPLETE-,POC: Darryl Richard): Phase III Project: Refurbishment of Median #1 and #2 on St.
Andrews at entrance to Lely off of US 41,
2-9-07: 100% plans received from McGee
2-15-07: CLM confirms quote for $8,734.47 for project.
3-15-07: Project Completed
(L-31) - COMPLETE - Coordination with Ted Weiner - LMA Agreement
1-13-07: Letter from Ted Weiner - received and forwarded to Scott Teach
4
16/
A
14
2-15-07: No official confIrmation received from Weiner that they are baking out of LMA, Weiner had discussion
with MSTU Committee Chair and requested assistance with Code Enforcement item, No further action is required
on this item.
(L-23) -{:OMPLETE - (Danyl) - (FDOT) (PROJECT PRIORITY #1 AS PER 11-17-06 MEETING) Lely Phase
II-Landscape and Irrigation; Final 100% Design Approved by FDOT; Permit received from Bryan Dennis FDOT;
Waiting on Notice to Proceed from FDOT (requires checklist approval); Checklist has been submitted to FDOT
for approval.
5-1-06; FDOT Notice to Proceed is pending. Checklist has been approved,
5-15-06; Notice to proceed still pending, checklist has been approved,
5-30-06; FDOT NTP and drawings delivered to purchasing - pending advertisement from purchasing,
6-5-06: Contract Letting by Purchasing, Bids due by 6-30-06; BCC Approval for 7-25-06 meeting (Novus
Deadline of7-10-06)
6-12-06: Bids are due June 30, 2006 - bee 7-25-06
6-15-06; Pre-Bid Meeting on June 20, 2006
6-27 -06; Addendum # I - in progress,
7-18-06; BCC to award bid to Vila & Sons -7-25-06
7-25-06: BCC Approved Vila & Son Contract
8-17-06: Purchasing reports that Vila & Sons is completing paperwork for FDOT portion of contract and will
retum it back to Purchasing prior to issue of Contract/Purchase Order.
8-22-06: Vila & Sons to return paperwork to purchasing and anticipate availability for project within 2 weeks,
Signed contract from Purchasing/County Attomey Office is pending, NTP is anticipated on September 5, 2006,
9-1-06: Contract sent to County Attorney Office for signature by Brenda Brilhart,
9-5-06: Conversation with Kay Nell indicates that Colleen Green is assigned to review contract, She suggests a
follow-up call in 48 hours for confIrmation of approval.
9-19-06: Notice to Proceed for Vila & Son; project begins: September 19,2006 with 90 day contract period
ending December 18, 2006,
11-6-06: Vila & Son Pay Application # 1 reviewed and rejected due to non-completion of' Preparation for
Planting' line item, Pay Application will be sent back to contractor for revision,
11-7-06: Revised pay application approved for payment. Project is 57 % completed,
1-17 -07: Substantial Completion Inspection; Punch-List Complete for outstanding items, Present were: Philip
Thibeaux, Vila & Son; Danyl Richard, A TM Liaison; and Mike McGee, McGee & Associates; Roger Dick,
[rrigation Project Manager.
2-21-07: Confirmation Final Close-out change order is processed (CO #2),
(L-26) - COMPLETE - Order for new Sign - Pebble Beach Median # 19
8-17-06: Lely MSTU Committee requested that Staff have Lykins provide quote for downed sign at median #19
Pebble Beach Drive,
8-31-06: Staff request that Lykins provide quote for issue of PO.
9-8-06: Quote Received, but committee did not approve the amount. - Only to get a quote.
10-9-06: Staff requires Lely MSTU Committee approval for this item in order to proceed,
10-19-06: Committee review of item, Consensus is that item is not an MSTU Project and is the concem of the
Lely Civic Association (HOA), The sign was originally installed by the HOA,
(L-28) - COMPLETE - PEBBLE BEACH OVERPASS PROJECT -Road & Bridge to reconstruct asphalt on
overpass, No confIrmation of schedule from R& B as of today - 3-6-06 and as of5-15-06
5-30-06; Stormwater Director (Calvert) is working on project estimate and scope, To be complete within 2 weeks,
7-18-06: Jerry Kurtz reports project is not funded this fIscal year and there are no immediate project needs,
8-17-06: Lely MSTU Committee request review of project and reconsideration for project schedule,
8-18-06: Eugene Calvert sends email indicating that the project is not scheduled/funded by Stormwater,
8-22-06: Committee has requested review of previous determination by Storm water that the project does not
warrant action by Storm water, A TM Liaison Staff has set up a meeting on August 24, 2006 at I :00 PM to discuss,
8-24-06: Staff meets with Committee Chairman Bob Slebodnik to review project.
9-1-06: RLS sent to Scott Teach to confIrm that the MSTU can fund 50% of $65,000,00 project; Stormwater
Dept. would fund other 50%,
5
16/
A
14
9-11-06: RLS response by Scott Teach indicates that the MSTU cannot ftmd the project. Pending Committee
action to cancel project, the project cannot be funded by MSTU funds,
10-19-06: As per County Attorney's review and response project is determined to be a 'non-MSTU' Project and
falls outside of the authorization as per Current MSTU Ordinance.
(L-25) - COMPLETE-Pending Committee Action - PALM TREE REPLACEMENT - MCGEE
recommendations pending as per committee request. Committee is interested in Foxtail Palms.-
7118/06: McGee provided quote and committee waiting for phase 11 before proceeding with project.
8-17-06: McGee formal written proposal is pending,
8-17-06: Staff requests a formal written proposal from McGee & Associates at MSTU Meeting,
8-22-06: Written Proposal from McGee is pending,
9-11-06: Anticipated delivery date 9-30-06
10-19-06: McGee provides cost estimate with recommendations for Committee, Committee Action is required to
proceed with Project.
(L-27) - COMPLETE - Order for new Sign at Entrance Lely MSTU US 41 at St. Andrews; Lykins quote for
$760.00 approved by Committee on July 20, 2006,
7-24-06: Staff request to purchase for Lykins in the amount of$760,OO
8-17-06: Lykins installation of sign pending,
8-22-06: PO issued to Lykins for installation of sign, Installation to be complete by 2"' week Sept.
8-31-06: Proof will be forwarded to Staff on 9-1-06 for review,
9-7-06; Danyl approved the proof,
9-22-06: Lykins begins installation of sign,
10-1-06: Lykins installation complete
(L-21) COMPLETE - Flag lighting - not working.-
Anticipated completion date - September 30th, 2006
8-17-06; Eb Simmonds contacted for lighting and flagpoles and took care of problem under contract - no fee
charged
10-10-06: Lights reported 100% operational by Committee Chairman
(L-I) - COM PI,ETE- Spraying of Exotic vegetation at St. Andrews Canal-Travis Gossard contacted regarding
request for re~spraying of exotics.
8-22-06: Danny Dominguez confirms that the re-spraying of the Canal has taken place,
(L -2) - COMPLETE--Painting of Curbs and Yellow Paint at Median Tips
6-15-06; Estimate for work approved minus purchase of material (paint), Staff to obtain material separate to
Commercial Land Maintenance proposal.
6-23-06: Requested Gerald Morris to let us know - R&B painting schedule and paint in stock?
7-6-06: Gerald emailed giving us an update on their painting schedule and asked J.Vliet to respond to us,
7-18-06; Spoke to John Vliet and he stated to make sure to use FDOT standards on paint and not to change
anything, Just repaint.
7-18-06; Will purchase paint at Sherwin Williams and provide to CLM,
7-20-06: Paint and materials dropped off to CLM
8-15-06: CLM performing painting, curbs completed, painting of numbers not complete
8-22-06: Project is completed,
(1.-3) -COMPLETE -Sign Plantings of Crown of Thorn (Augusta at Forest Hill) - CLM directed to plant crown of
thorn at existing sign on July 20, 2006,
8-14-06: Inspection indicated that plantings had not occurred CLM contacted,
8-22-06: Plantings of Crown of Thorn is completed,
(L-4) COMPLETE- Solar lighting - HOA Project - Augusta Boulevard at Forest Hill Sign Lighting Project- HOA
to ftmd installation, MSTU to pay for V, of construction cost.
6
161
a 1 h
I
5-15-06: Pending Purchasing approval
5-30-06: Kent Tech is revising their estimate as per contract,
6-12-06: Kent tech has provided requested quote, item being processed by FinancelPurchasing
(L-5) -COMPLETE-Lely Phase II- (Electrical & Lighting & Irrigation Controllers): - Construction Cost: EB
Simmonds Cost $23,010,00; Lumec Cost $17,050,00 ($1,550 per pole wi 11 poles) ~Total Project $40,060,00,
E,B, Simmonds is complete. FPL to power up Meter-pending.
5-1-06; FPL and EB Simmonds work complete,
(L-6) COMPLETE-Potable Water Meter Removal
(L 7) -COMPLETE-Repair of Asphalt on Forest Hill - COMPLETE; Andy Vanisak, Road & Bridge, performed
repairs to the area at no cost to the MSTU; Initial Repair Complete
(L-8) Flag Replacement- COMPLETED-Flag Order for poles at St, Andrews and US 41
6-15-06; as per committee request the flags will be ordered twice a year or "as needed"
(L-9) -COMPLETE-Lely Phase 1- Complete (311105) - COMPLETED
(L-IO) -COMPLETE-Drainage Project -Pebble Beach Road- Non-MSTU Project
(L-ll) -COMPI,ETE-Drainage Project -St. Andrews Boulevard-Embankment Cleaning- 100%
(L-12) COMPLETE-Baltusrol Culvert Inlet Clean-Out
5-12-06; Project Competed by Commercial Land Maintenance
(L-13) -COM PLETE-Baltusrol Overpass Asphalt Repair - at the request of the Committee Chairman Road &
Bridge performed the repair.
3-10-06; Project Completed by Road & Bridge
(L-14) -COMPLETE-Baltusrol Tree near lift station; Committee requested staff investigate weather the tree
identified near the existing lift station was the responsibility of the MSTU to maintain as it was severely damaged
by Hurricane Wilma, had been subsequently removed by others, and a huge stump remained,
2-2-06; Investigation by Staff concludes that the tree stump is outside of the Right of way on Baltusrol and that
the tree is either on Golf Course Property or Lot owner at Lot 133 Baltusrol.
(L-15) COMPLETE- "Pinehurst Estates" Sign Area on Baltusrol Landscape Project; Refurbishment Project to
address the non-planted areas around the existing signs for the entrance into Pinehurst Estates-Lely MSTU Area,
5-5-06; Project Completed by Commercial Land Maintenance,
(L-16) COMPLETE-Dora! Circle: Pepper Tree Removal
6-1-06; Road & Bridge Contacted concerning the removal of pepper tree within County Right of Way,
6-15-06; Pepper Tree reported removed
(L-17) -COMPLETE-Doral Circle Sign Lighting Project
3-15-06Project Completed by Kent Technologies under contract with Lely MSTU,
(L-18) -COMPLETE-Doral Circle Bench Area Refurbishment Project. Committee directed staffto obtain quotes
for Commercial Land Maintenance to pressure clean pavers and apply protective sealant, replace decking on
benches, and reset shrubs in planted beds,
2-10-06; Project reported complete by Commercial Land Maintenance,
(L-19) - On Hold- Phase II Project; Advanced Bench Order and Installation; As per Committee request quote was
requested of Commercial Land Maintenance for the installation of benches to include storage. The order for the
7
16 /
A
14
benches was on hold due to the storage issue, As per the Bid Letting on June 5, 2006 and following Pre-Bid
meeting the benches are to be included in the bid for Phase II Project as an alternate,
(L-20) - COMPLETE -FLAG POLE REPLACEMENT-
a, Received Quotes from annual contractors and other vendors. Lykens Sign Tech was low quote, Purchasing
recommended Lykens Sign Tech, committee cancelled project.
b, Committee has requested CLM to demolition existing poles and bases as per annual contract rates not to exceed
$2,500,00 after demolition, quotes will be requested from Sign Companies,
5-1-06; PO issue is pending as per Committee Approval.
5-15-06; Sign Craft received NTP on 5-12-06 and waiting on material order - drawing prepared.- 3 weeks
estimated for poles to be received,
6-12-06: flag poles to arrive within 1 week. - On site meeting with contract to confirm locations,
6-15-06; Flag poles and all materials received by contractor; Installation to begin upon receipt of Permit from
Collier County Sign Permitting,
6-27-06 : to be installed by June 30'" pending CDS review of construction pad
7-3-06: Flag Poles are up with flags, For 4'" of July..!!!!
8
161 A 14
~:~~ing~ ~fO~ ~.' Rr~~,EI\fFD
c;oyle ----6 JI.
Coletta ~GOLF ESTATES BEAUTIFICATION MSnJ,,,,,,,(,m"''''''''''l<e,,
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
2885 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, FI 34104
December 20, 2007
Minutes
I. The meeting was called to order by Bob Slebodnik at 4:00 PM.
II. Attendance:
Members: Tony Branco, Robert Cole, Kathleen Dammert, David Larson,
Robert Slebodnik
County: Darryl Richard-Project Manager, Tessie Sillery - Operations
Coordinator, Caroline Soter-Budget Analyst
Others: Mike McGee - McGee & Associates, Jim Fritchey - Commercial
Land Maintenance, Darlene Lafferty - Mancan
III. Approval of Agenda
Add: XI. D. Replacement of Lantana with Impatients at Front Entry.
Robert Cole moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Second by
David Larson. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
IV. Approval of Minutes: November 15, 2007
Tony Branco moved to approve the November 15, 2007 Minutes as
submitted. Second by Robert Cole. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
V. Landscape Maintenance Report - CLM
Jim Fritche reported:
. Mulching is complete
. Installation of Foxtail Palms & Bougainvillea complete
VI. Landscape Architect's Report - Michael McGee
A. Doral Survey re-guarding Fence I new fence design with cost
estimates Doral Survey
Darryl Richard distributed an Initial Review by Pam Lulich & reported the
following: (See attached)
}> A revision to the plans was required
}> The recommendation was made to refrain from accessing the ~~es
property on the corner of Doral & Rattlesnake Hammock Rd, Date
item#'
-,., -'s tc
~ Recommended delaying meeting with Property Owners until Plans are
complete 1
~ A pe~mit "may" be required from CDS (Community Development 6 if A 1 ,.
Services) 'I
~ Concerns with the Design work in the Swale that runs parallel to the
fence line
1. Recommendation for review of the Storm Water Management by an
Engineer, as it could affect the Hydrology along the Swale
~ Mike McGee would assess the Initial Review
Discussions ensued & was determined Cross Sections would be required.
The Cross Sections & materials would be resubmitted to Pam Lulich for
review. It was suggested that the Engineer Study be paid by the County,
Darryl Richard announced the ATM would assume responsibility for
maintaining the Plant & Shrub material on Rattlesnake Hammock Rd.
Discussion continued & it was noted that the inclusion of the private
property on the corner of Doral & Rattlesnake Hammock would improve
the safety of the intersection. A decision must be made re-guarding the
inclusion of the private property before the Plans will be completed, The
recommendation was made for Pam Lulich to visit the site.
VII. Budget Report
A. Budget Committee - Caroline Soto - Bob Cole
Budget Report was distributed and reviewed (See attached),
. Improvements General Available $241,500.00
. An invoice was issued to True Wave in the amount of $192.90 for
the Irrigation damage
Darryl Richard reported on incomplete re-grading by the Contractor. He
relayed the Committees dissatisfaction with the incomplete work. He
noted the Committee request for ATM liaison.
Robert Cole questioned the requested $40,000 transfer from
Improvements General to the Operating Budget.
Caroline Soto responded that a P,O. Modification was done in lieu of the
transfer.
It was agreed that a Budget Amendment to include the $40,000 transfer
as per the Motion would be presented at the January 17, 2008
VIII. Transportation Operations Report
A. Project Manager's Report - Darryl Richard distributed and reviewed
(See attached):
o (L-39) Irrigation Refurbishment Project - Additional Internal Review
required by Darryl Richard, Mike McGee, & Roger Dick
o (L-38) Palm Tree Replacement Project - Complete
o (L37) Bench facing Lake Project - Brick Pavers are installed,
waiting for arrival of Bench
2
Robert Slebodnik stated Project (L-42) Rip Rap-by Cypress Laker 6 I
Condominium is not complete. J.
Darryl Richard will follow up with Road & Bridge concerning the Rip
Rap completion. Reported repair work is required on the overpass
noted the asphalt is giving way.
Discussions ensued and was determined the asphalt work last year
was a temporary repair. A request was made to inquire with Road &
Bridge when the permanent repair is scheduled,
o (L-34) Ongoing Maintenance Contract: Commercial Land Contract
expiration date 9-28-08 was noted
B. Report Re meeting with owner of Doral Corner lot I re fence
options - Previously discussed VI. A.
IX. Housekeeping Items
A. Rip rap repair on St. Andrews Blvd. near Cypress Lake
Condominiums - Previously discussed VIII. A.
B. Paving on Pebble Beach Blvd. near golf cart crossing. None
X. Committee Reports - None
XI. Old Business
A. Future Beautification Projects - On hold
B. Vehicle Accident Report at front entry on 9-20-07 at 3:30 P.M.-
With Risk management for collection.
C. Damage to rip-rap placed on drainage canal bank by Cypress
Lake condominium - Previously discussed VIII. A.
XII. New Business
A. Grants - Therese Stanley (not present)
The request was made for the attendance of Therese Stanley at the
January 17, 2007 meeting for direction on reimbursement for the
Irrigation Project
XIV. Public Comments - None
Robert Slebodnik thanked the Committee & Staff for the hard work &
cooperation throughout the year.
XV. There being no further business to come before the Committee, the
meeting was adjourned at 5:23 P.M.
3
A
14
Lely Golf Estates BeautificatiolJw
MSTU Advisory Committee J. 6 I
cCt~.t .&u;t
Robert Slebodnik, Chairman
These minutes approved by the Committee on /- 17- 0&
as presented .j or amended
The next meeting is scheduled for January 17, 20074:00 p.m.
Collier County Transportation Building/East Conference Room
2885 Horseshoe Drive South, Naples, FL 34104
4
A
14
,~-"
""")
)."
"--~{!I.'({9tr. j
~-'~-':: . ~~fH~ ('
.- ......:=:-:......,. ',.,l)fJH!)i$S
-'---'''''::~.:.: ~?2pfS
~~
Fiala
Halas -,--
Hennin9---
Coyle ':J;-'--
Coletta ~p
GOLF ESTATES BEAUTIFICATION MSllJ6 ,
ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1
2885 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, FI 34104
n
December 20, 2007
lLt
--
AGENDA
I. Call Meeting to Order
II. Attendance
III. Approval of Agenda
IV. Approval of Minutes: November 15, 2007
V. Landscape Maintenance Report - CLM
VI. Landscape Architect's Report - Michael McGee
A. Dora I Survey re-guarding Fence I new fence design with cost
estimates
VII. Budget Report
A. Budget Committee -Caroline Soto & Bob Cole
VIII. Transportation Operations Report
A. Project Manager's Report - Darryl Richard
B, Report re meeting with owner of Doral corner lot I re fence options
IX. Housekeeping Items
A. Rip rap repair on SI. Andrew Blvd. near Cypress Gate Condominiums
B, Paving on Pebble Beach Blvd. near golf cart crossover
X. Committee Reports
XI. Old Business
A, Future Beautification Project List
B. Vehicle Accident Report at front entry on 9-20-07 at 3:30 P.M.
C. Damage to rip-rap placed on drainage canal bank by Cypress Lake
condominium
MISC, eOfTes:
XII. New Business
A. Grants - Therese Stanley Date:
XIII. Public Comments Ilem#:
XIV. Adjournment Copies to: /
The next meeting is scheduled for January 17, 20084:00 p,m.
Collier County Transportation Building/East Conference Room
2885 Horseshoe Drive South, Naples, Fl34104
161 A
14
161
~ECEIVED
FEB 0 8 2008
~:~=s ____---- t.~
Henning---- JI.
g~r~~ta~&rmATES BEAUTIFICATION MSTU
ADVISORY COMMlnEE
2885 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, FI 34104
BO;-':!n1 :;;r '~~(ltmty COfnrrtisSIO/lerS
14
November 15,2007
Minutes
I. The meeting was called to order by Bob Slebodnik at 4:02 PM.
II. Attendance:
Members: Tony Branco, Robert Cole, Kathleen Dammert, David Larson,
Robert Slebodnik
County: Darryl Richard-Project Manager, Tessie Sillery - Operations
Coordinator, Caroline Sob-Budget Analyst, Roger Dick - Irrigation
Project Manager
Others: Mike McGee - McGee & Associates, Jim Fritchey - Commercial
Land Maintenance, Darlene Lafferty - Mancan
III. Approval of Agenda
Add: VI. A. Doral Survey re-guarding Fence / new fence design with cost
estimates
XIII. B, Landscaping damage on US41 from St. Andrews Blvd. to
Rattlesnake Hammock Rd.
Kathleen Dammert moved to approve the Agenda as amended.
Second by David Larson. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
IV. Approval of Minutes: October 18, 2007
Change: II. Attendance should read Darryl Richard "arrived late"
Pg. 2 VIII. A. Motion carried unanimously "4-0"
Pg. 3 paragraph 4 should read It was recommended to delay the
installation until more infonnation was available "including a plan
from McGee & Associates" but proceeding with the lift station
staining.
XIII. Should read Tony Branco inquired if the pothole located "at
the entrance to the assisted living" could be filled.
Tony Branco moved to approve the October 18, 2007 Minutes as
amended. Second by Kathleen Dammert. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0. MIS, : ,reS
Date
i,tem#:
--
,
,
V.
Landscape Maintenance Report - CLM
Jim Fritche reported:
. Mulching is in progress
. Removal of stump at median #3
. Bench pavers are in progress
. Trimmed Bougainvillea around the Carpentaria Palms
161
A 14
Darryl Richard requested quote approval from Swartz Associates in the
amount of $793.80 for bench purchase. (See attached)
Robert Cole moved to approve purchase of bench from Swartz
Associates for $793.80 to be installed at Forest Hills & Augusta
intersection. Second by David Larson. Motion carried unanimously
5-0.
VI. Landscape Architect's Report - Michael McGee
A. Doral Survey re-guarding Fence I new fence design with cost
estimates Doral Survey
Mike McGee reported:
. 1 dry Alamanda hedge on the outbound side of US41 entry,
Recommended increasing zone watering time
. Agapanthus is 50% gone on the outbound side. The inbound side is
75% full, Recommended replacing with one of the following:
1. Blueberry Fox Lily or
2, Bougainvillea Silhouette
Discussion ensued concerning replacement of the Agapanthus & the
annual Lantana plantings,
Robert S/ebodnik moved to replace the Lantana at the front entry &
substitute with a bouquet of Impatients & remove Agapanthus and
replace with Silhouette Bougainvillea as per maintenance contract.
Second by Robert Cole. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
Mike McGee reviewed the Doral Circle Fence Project. Reported the
Survey did not indicate a drainage easement on the properties but did
show a swale along the property line. The fence located on the corner of
Doral Circle & Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. was on private property &
curved inward ranging from 1 to 10 ft inside the property line. Reviewed 2
proposed drawings based on the survey:
1, Keeping the Fence inside ROW which would not improve sight visibility
on the corner lot as originally planned.
2. Install the Wall or Fence 6-7 ft. closer to the road which would require
a 6 fl easement on the property. Noted the property owner would gain
yardage. In addition a license agreement to install the Fence &
Landscaping would be required.
2
Reviewed an estimate in the amount of $114,793.50 to include: (See
attached) 16 I
~ Site Demolition, Preparation, & Disposal
~ Site Materials - Retaining Wall & Decorative Concrete Fence
~ Plant Material - Foxtail Palms, Dwarf Firebush, & Bougainvillea
Silhouette
~ Irrigation Materials
~ No contingency is included
A
14
Discussions ensued for the following:
. Approval & coordination with property owner for easement access.
Mike McGee, Darryl Richard & Dave Larson were asked to meet with
the owner of the corner lot to discuss Fence options
. Clarification from Pam Lulich if an agreement could be secured for
MSTU to maintain the installation on Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. under
ATM funding
. Request A TM funding for landscaping
. Request Storm Water funding for the improved drainage
Robert Slebodnik summarized
1, Jurisdiction review by Pam Lulich
2. Additional drawing details are required for expenditure of money
Robert Cole moved to proceed with McGee & Associates plans for
the new wall along Rattlesnake Hammock. Mr. Richard will negotiate
with Pam (Lulich) about future maintenance of the wall & also
negotiate with the comer property owner at Dorsi & Rattlesnake
Hammock about changing their ROW or easement. Second by David
Larson. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
Mike McGee reviewed a quote from AG-TRONIX in the amount of
$17,480 for the Master Control System conversion at US41 & St.
Andrews.
Discussions ensued on various alternatives for the conversion, The
following was noted:
. An additional $5400 would be required to include Doral Circle in the
Master Control System conversion,
. The AG-TRONIX quote did not include installation & would require
additional quotes from installation contractors.
. Available Grant Funds
Tony Branco moved ahead to install this internet connected
communicating System that will monitor evel}' possibility that can go
wrong in our irrigation. Not to exceed $25,000. Second by Robert
S/ebodnik. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
I was suggested to invite Therese Stanley - Grants Coordinator to attend
the December 20,2007 meeting,
VII. Budget Report
A. Budget Committee - Caroline Soto - Bob Cole
3
Budget Report was distributed and reviewed (See attached)." 6 I
. Requested $40,000 Budget amendment was incomplete
A14
VIII.
Transportation Operations Report
A. Project Manager's Report - Darryl Richard distributed and reviewed
(See attached):
o (l40) Lift Station Beautification - Utilities Department has
committed to staining or painting the lift station at County expense
The Committee was very adamant that the County use stain in lieu of
paint.
o (l37) Bench facing lake Project - Bench pad installation in
progress by ClM
B. Landscaping damage on US41 from St. Andrews Blvd. to
Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. - Darryl Richard reported Kent
Technologies was responsible for repairs to the damaged sod &
irrigation.
IX. Housekeeping Items
A. ROW patch on Sl Andrews Blvd. - Darryl Richard reported Road &
Bridge reviewed the pothole on the side of the road and determined it
was located in a private drive and was a homeowner issue
X. Committee Reports - None
XI. Old Business
A. Future Beautification Projects - None
B. Vehicle Accident Report at front entry on 9-20-07 at 3:30 P.M.-
None
C. Damage to rip-rap placed on drainage canal bank by Cypress
Lake condominium - Darryl Richard stated Road & Bridge will not
replace rip-rap.
Robert Slebodnik reported conducting a drive through with Donna
Fiala pointing out the drainage bridge. Noting that unfinished projects
are detracting from MSTU Beautification. Suggestions were given to
Mr. Slebodnik & Ms. Fiala requested to be copied in on all
correspondence '
Robert Cole inquired about Civic Association contribution for the
Fence Project.
Discussions ensued. David Larson stated the Civic Association
agreed to commit funding for landscaping.
It was agreed to accept $11,000 for landscaping,
XII. New Business - None
XIV. Public Comments - None
4
xv.
~,~ .t~ ~ -- I
' 1 '
"."
There being no further business to come before the Committee, the
meeting was adjourned at 5:57 P.M.
Lely Golf Estates Beautification
MSTU Advisory Committee
--:' ~/ /
,/k;:td U47J
Robert Sleb6dnik, Chairman
These minutes approved by the Committee on
as presented or amended if
ii/SOl
The next meeting is scheduled for December 20, 2007 4:00 p.m.
Collier County Transportation Building/East Conference Room
2885 Horseshoe Drive South, Naples, Fl 34104
5
14
16/
A 14
November 15,2007
Prepared by:
Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes
Tessie Sillery, Operations Coordinator, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes
.
Lely MSTU Project Status
(L-43) : ACTIVE - (pOC Darryl Richard) - Doral Circle and Rattlesnake Hammock Wall and
Landscaping Conceptual Design
11-7-07: WO # TLO-MA-3614-08-02 - $ 2, 490,00 for this project - WO in process of requesting signatures,
(L-42): ACTIVE - (POC: Darryl Richard) - Rip Rap- by Cypress Lake Condominium
10-16-07: Committee requested Road and Bridge to put rip rap on banl",
(L-41): ACTIVE -(POC: fessie Sillery}-: - McGee & Assoc. Annual Contract: 04-3614
10-9-07: Committee approved McGees proposal for $8,525,00
10-24-07: Work Order in progress
11-6-07: County staff requested changes in the proposal.
11-9-07: Work Order in progress for signatures
(L-40) - ACTIVE -(POCo Oanyl RIchard); - Lift Station Beautification (Baltusrol Course Crossing)
9-20-07: Committee approved up to $3,000 for work to be completed by CLM,
10-16-07: CLM submitted estimate - $ 3,789,30 - over limit committee motioned,
10-18-07: Committee approved quote,
10-18-07: Committee requeste McGee to do design,
11-7-07: Danyl and Jim (CLM) will be meeting on 11-8-07 to review project.
(L-39) - - ACTIVE (POC Darryl Richard); Irrigation Refurbishment Project
9-20-07: Committee requested for Roger Dick - County Irrigation Project Mgr. to attend next meeting,
10-18-07: Requested for estimates per Roger & McGee (team work)
11-7-07: Roger will review and attend the next Lely Meeting with quotes,
(L- 38) - ACTIVE -(PaC Darryl Richard): Palm Tree Replacement Project - medians 4 to 10 median tips
9-20-07: Committee requested CLM to quote project and discuss at next meeting,
10-16-08: CLM submitted estimates for upcoming meeting,
10-18-07: Committee, staff and Mcgee discussed quotes and requested clarification,
11-7-07: Darryl and Jim (CLM) will be meeting on 11-8-07 to review project.
(L-34) - ACTIVE -(PaC: Tessic Sillery): Ongoing Maintenance Contract: Commercial Land Maintenance;
Contract 04-3676 "Lely Golf Estates MSTU Roadway Grounds Maint," To Commercial Land Maintenance, [nc,
- Bid # 04-3676 - plus 3 renewals. - expires on 9-28-08
10-12-07: New Fiscal Year 07-08 - PO issued and NTP given,
(L-37) - ACTIVE - POC- (Tessie Sillery) : Bench Facing Lake Project
8-17-07: Committee requested for McGee & Commercial Land to go ahead and do the work, Bench with pavers,
8-22-07: Concept drawings due Sept. 20th for the committee,
9-20-07: McGee did not have drawings completed and will submit drawings to next meeting with costs for wall
in order for committee to make decision on other projects.
10-18-08: Committee requested clarification of quote,
10-24-07: Pending CLM revising and Clarifying Quote
11-7-07: Danyl and Jim (CLM) will be meeting on 11-8-07 to review project.
11-14-07: Quote for Bench received - Swartz $ 793,80
1
161
A 14
,-.,...,
(L-36) - COMPLETE - (PaC Darryl RlchardJ~ Doral Entrance Enhancements & Wall/Fence Project;
Lely MSTU - Survey by RWA at Doral Circle
PHASE Start - End Date
NTP CONST 9/24/2007
60 Day Consl 11/23/2007
Project COMPLETE
11/23/2007
11/7/07 Ree'd
survey
7-19-07: Committee approves $5,000,00 for survey of project area, Ball Park Cost provided from McGee
indicates $25,000 Landscaping; $80,000 for wall; and $40,000 for a fence (on top the wall); Total Project is
estimated as: $145,000,00 Committee Chair will contact Lely Civic Association for cost sharing for this project.
8-16-07: Update: RWA gave estimate for $ 7,900,00 and from staff recommendation for mstu members to make
an amendment to previous motion from $5,000, to $7,900,
8-17-07: Committee requested to cut down on the size of the parameters for the fence to go up and no more than
$5,000 to spend on survey, - Also, looking at County paying (rattlesnake hanunock funds) for the maintenance
(Pam Lulich attended meeting and gave other landscape options) wall vs landscaping
8-22-07: Received estimate at $4,900 from R W A and will work order in process,
9-7-07: Rec'd WO from Vendor and in Work Order Process for additional signatures,
9-20-07: Rec'd PO
9-24-07: NTP - start date 9-24-07 and Completion date: 11-23-07 - PO 1/4500084146 - Dated 9-20-07)
WO 1/ RWA-Ff-3944-07-O 8 - "Contract 06-3944 Annual Contract For Roadways"
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
(L-33) - COMPU,:TE( pac Darryl RichardL Doral Circle Entry Feature Development; Includes installation
of fence along Rattlesnake Hammock Road and adjoining entry features,
5-17 -07: Committee votes to commit $2,500 in consulting fees to McGee for project, McGee will bring
recommendations to 6-21-07 regular meeting,
6-15-07: Project Complete
(L-22) - COMPLETE (l'OC Darryl Richard)~ (PROJECT PRIORITY #4 AS PER 11-17-06 MEETING)
Augusta Boulevard at Forest Hill Planting Project-
SCHEDULE:
Lely MSTU: Augusta at Forest Hill- Landscape & Irrigation
PHASE Start - End Date
Committee Approval for Hannula quote 4/19/2007
BCC APPR Not Required (105 K estimate by McGee)
NTP CaNST 5/1l/2007
60 DA Y Substantial Completion 7/11/2007
90 DAY CONST 5111/2007-8/10/2007
CONST-COMPLETE 8110/2007
Status: Mike McGee has completed 100% plans for project; Presentation to Golf Course Management resulted in
positive approval for project; Waiting on cost estimate from McGee & Associates,
5-30-06; Drawings dated 7/14/05 received from McGee; - Project will be scheduled for construction after phase II
is completed.
7-18-06: Committee has placed project on hold until phase II completes.
8-22-06: Project is on hold with 100% plans approved by Golf Course and MSTU Committee,
2
161
'..
A
ILL
.
11-16-06: Committee reviewed plans and McGee provided cost estimate of $30,000,00 for total project. MSTU
Commitment for project estimated by McGee as $15,000,00; Committee Action is required to move project
forward,
12-14-06: MSTU Committee selects to include golf cart crossing area into project.
1-17 -07: Meeting with Golf Course Superintendent Allan Cooper to review project,
1-18-07: Golf Course Superintendent is reviewing project, Portion of project is outside of ROW, Portion of
project outside of ROW requires Landscape Maintenance Agreement. One (I) Spare valve is available for use by
the MSTU for project.
2-14-07 : Request for Quote sent out - deadline March 9ili, 2007
3-15-07: Committee to review quotes and select lowest quote,
4-10-07: Hannula is apparent low quote - Committee approval pending for $25,908,81
4-17-07: Committee approved for Hanula to do the job,
4-30-07: PO Request in process
5-11-07: Notice to Proceed sent to Hannula, Field meeting scheduled for May 22, 2007, Meetings to re-occur
each week on Tuesday's
(L-32)- COMPLETE -{pac: Tessie Sillery ); Refurbish entrance sign - damaged by fallen palm at St. Andrews
Sign,
4-17 -07: Committee approved for Lykins PO to be opened to repair sign, Committee asked for more information
on deflector plates,
5-17-07: Commitment from Lykins was to be complete by May 11,2007 inspection pending today's drive-
through,
5-17-07: Project Complete
(L-29) -COMPLETE -{POCo Tessie Sillery) - Median Re-Painting By Road & Bridge; As per Committee
Request on 11-\6-06 Road & Bridge needs to paint "4" numbers at each median opening,
12-20-06: No action taken by Road & Bridge to date, Road & Bridge contacted pertaining Committee request to
paint curbing,
2-14-07: Painting not done by Road & Bridge
3-15-07: R&B supervisor (Don) will meet with staff to make sure the location of #'s
4-17-07: Meeting with Road & Bridge crew to start project on April23, 2007 with Don Champlin,
4-30-07: Completed
(L-30) - COMPLETE - (PaC Tessie Sille, y, Flag Pole Pole Maintenance - Committee requested staff to
replace American Flag,
1-17-07: Facilities Maint. will replace flag today
1-18-07: Flags replaced
1-18-07: Committee requested for a different size flag
1-23-07 : Requested quote from Lykins
2-10-07: Single quotes and quotes for two for the committee to approve
2-15-07: Committee requested Tessie purchase flags through intemet
3-10-07: State Flag and American Flags purchased (2 of each) $187,00
3-15-07: Flags arrived today..,!!'
3-17-07: Flags installed - re-order will be on an as needed basis, County replacement flag is on order.
(L-25) -COMPLETI' (POC Dan-yl Richard): (PROJECT PRIORITY #3 AS PER 11-17-06 MEETING) Pebble
Beach Blvd, Golf Cart Crossing Area Improvements
10-19-06: Committee directs Committee Chairman Bob Slebodnik to meet with Golf Course to determine if
project is agreeable to Golf Course Management for Construction,
11-17-06: Committee Approved McGee & Associates Concept Based on Foxtail Palm installation, McGee &
Associates to provide one signed and sealed plan and one reproducible not signed and sealed,
12-18-06: Quote for $\0,801.94 received from Commercial Land Maintenance,- on hold until see below
12-18-06: Quote from CLM is approved for $10,801.94 under terms of annual contract.
3
161
A
14
,~
1-17-06: Staff notified that existing irrigation is insufficient for project. Altemative solutions under review by
McGee,
2-15-07: Requirments for project are: (I) need 2 separate valves for irrigation on each side of road; (2) need
confirmation of energized mainline 24 hrs a day; (3) need Golf Course to relocate existing irrigation heads; Bob
Slebodnick will contact AI Cooper and schedule a meeting time for follow-up,
3-14-07: Golf Course installing irrigation - 50% complete
4-10-07: Project Complete
(L-24) -COMPLETE! POC DaIry I Richard): - (PROJECT PRIORITY #2 AS PER 11-17-06 MEETING)
DORAL CIRCLE LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND LIGHTING PROJECT - Need Committee Action for
award of quote
6-15-06; Quotes received, issues with quotes and discrepancies identified, Committee requested that staffre-quote
project with clarification concerning the discrepancies,
6-27-06: Waiting on quotes,
7-18-06: Need a &id-tab Schedule from McGee & Associates and electrical engineering
8-17 -06: Quotes from Annual Contractors for ElectricallnstallationJDesign is pending,
8-21-06: Meeting with Bernie Simmonds to answer questions regarding quote request.
8-21-06: Owner of Kent Technologies Thom Esch office visit. Thom receives updated copy of plans,
8-22-06: Quotes from Annual Contractors is pending, Due date is August 29, 2006,
8-31-06: Vendors contacted regarding quote: Kent confinns that they will quote, Simmonds will get back to staff
on 9-1-06.
9-3-06: E.B. Simmonds Electrical quote received for $15,725,00 total electrical installation, Poles By County,
9-5-06; Bid Schedule revised and sent out,
10-19-06: Committee directs staff to obtain additional quotes, E,B, Simmonds quote rejected by Committee,
Request for break-down of each line item from E,B, Simmonds,
10-30-06: E,8, Simmonds request meeting with Mike McGee and Staff to review project and quote,
11-7-06: E,B, Simmonds meets with Liaison Staff and reviews original quote, Project is re-quoted for $10,350,00
Committee Approval Required,
11-16-06: Lumec Sales Representative Ron Steedman confinns quote of$2,500 per light for a total of$5,000,OO
Committee Approval Required,
11-17-06: Committee Approved E,B, Simmonds for $10,350,00; Approved $5,000,00 for Lumec; Approved
$6,025,00 for Commercial Land Maintenance or other Contractor (ck with Purchasing),
12-20-06: Light Poles are on order, upon receipt E,8, Simmonds will begin electrical work, followed by
Commercial Land Maintance installation of irrigation and landscaping,
1-17-07: Light poles are due to be delivered on March 2, 2007 pending, PO Issued to EB Simmonds for
Electrical, PO Issued to CLM for landscape project; After receipt of light poles EB Simmonds will install.
3-9-07: Received Lumec Poles for project
3-14-07: Poles picked up by E8 Simmons
3-20-07: Electrical Installation Completed by E.B, Simmonds
4-10-07: Project Completed
(L-32) - COMPLETE (POC Danyl Richard): Phase III Project: Refurbishment of Median #1 and #2 on St.
Andrews at entrance to Lely off of US 41,
2-9-07: 100% plans received from McGee
2-15-07: eLM continns quote for $8,734.47 for project.
3-15-07: Project Completed
(L-31) COMPLETE Coordination with Ted Weiner - LMA Agreement
1-13-07: Letter from Ted Weiner - received and forwarded to Scott Teach
2-15-07: No official confmnation received from Weiner that they are baking out ofLMA, Weiner had discussion
with MSTU Committee Chair and requested assistance with Code Enforcement item, No further action is required
on this item.
4
161
A
14
(L-23) ...(:OMPLETE - (Darryl) - (FDOT) (PROJECT PRIORITY #1 AS PER 11-17-06 MEETING) Lely Phase
ll-Landscape and Irrigation; Final 100% Design Approved by FDOT; Permit received from Bryan Dennis FDOT;
Waiting on Notice to Proceed from FOOT (requires checklist approval); Checklist has been submitted to FDOT
for approval.
5-1-06; FDOT Notice to Proceed is pending, Checklist has been approved,
5-15-06; Notice to proceed still pending, checklist has been approved,
5-30-06; FOOT NTP and drawings delivered to purchasing - pending advertisement from purchasing,
6-5-06: Contract Letting by Purchasing, Bids due by 6-30-06; BCC Approval for 7-25-06 meeting (Novus
Deadline of7-10-06)
6-12-06: Bids are due June 30, 2006 - bee 7-25-06
6-15-06; Pre-Bid Meeting on June 20, 2006
6-27-06; Addendum # I - in progress,
7-18-06; BCC to award bid to Vila & Sons -7-25-06
7-25-06: BCC Approved Vila & Son Contract
8-17-06: Purchasing reports that Vila & Sons is completing paperwork for FDOT portion of contract and will
return it back to Purchasing prior to issue of Contract/Purchase Order.
8-22-06: Vila & Sons to return paperwork to purchasing and anticipate availability for project within 2 weeks,
Signed contract from Purchasing/County Attorney Office is pending, NTP is anticipated on September 5, 2006,
9-1-06: Contract sent to County Attorney Office for signature by Brenda Brilhart,
9-5-06: Conversation with Kay Nell indicates that Colleen Green is assigned to review contract. She suggests a
follow-up call in 48 hours for confirmation of approval.
9-19-06: Notice to Proceed for Vila & Son; project begins: September 19,2006 with 90 day contract period
ending December 18, 2006,
11-6-06: Vila & Son Pay Application # I reviewed and rejected due to non-completion of' Preparation for
Planting' line item, Pay Application will be sent back to contractor for revision,
11-7 -06: Revised pay application approved for payment. Project is 57 % completed,
1-17-07: Substantial Completion Inspection; Punch-List Complete for outstanding items, Present were: Philip
Thibeaux, Vila & Son; Danyl Richard, A TM Liaison; and Mike McGee, McGee & Associates; Roger Dick,
Irrigation Project Manager.
2-21-07: Confirmation Final Close-out change order is processed (CO #2),
(L-26) - COMPLE'I E - Order for new Sign - Pebble Beach Median #19
8-17-06: Lely MSTU Committee requested that Staff have Lykins provide quote for downed sign at median #19
Pebble Beach Drive,
8-31-06: Staff request that Lykins provide quote for issue of PO,
9-8-06: Quote Received, but committee did not approve the amount. - Only to get a quote.
10-9-06: Staff requires Lely MSTU Committee approval for this item in order to proceed,
10-19-06: Committee review of item, Consensus is that item is not an MSTU Project and is the concern of the
Lely Civic Association (HOA), The sign was originally installed by the HOA,
(L-28) - COMPLETE - PEBBLE BEACH OVERPASS PROJECT -Road & Bridge to reconstruct asphalt on
overpass, No confirmation of schedule from R& Bas of today - 3-6-06 and as of 5-15-06
5-30-06; Stormwater Director (Calvert) is working on project estimate and scope, To be complete within 2 weeks,
7-18-06: Jerry Kurtz reports project is not funded this fiscal year and there are no immediate project needs,
8-17-06: Lely MSTU Committee request review of project and reconsideration for project schedule,
8-18-06: Eugene Calvert sends email indicating that the project is not scheduled/funded by Stormwater,
8-22-06: Committee has requested review of previous determination by Stormwater that the project does not
warrant action by Storm water. A TM Liaison Staff has set up a meeting on August 24, 2006 at 1 :00 PM to discuss,
8-24-06: Staff meets with Committee Chairman Bob Slebodnik to review project,
9-1-06: RLS sent to Scott Teach to confmn that the MSTU can fund 50% of$65,000,OO project; Stormwater
Dept. would fund other 50%,
9-11-06: RLS response by Scott Teach indicates that the MSTU cannot fund the project, Pending Committee
action to cancel project, the project cannot be funded by MSTU funds.
10-19-06: As per County Attorney's review and response project is determined to be a 'non-MSTU' Project and
falls outside of the authorization as per Current MSTU Ordinance,
5
r
"M 14
(L-25) ~ COMPLETE-Pending Committce Action - PALM TREE REPLACEMENT - MCGEE
recommendations pending as per committee request, Committee is interested in Foxtail Palms, -
7/18/06: McGee provided quote and committee waiting for phase II before proceeding with project.
8-17-06: McGee formal written proposal is pending,
8-17-06: Staff requests a formal written proposal from McGee & Associates at MSTU Meeting,
8-22-06: Written Proposal from McGee is pending,
9-11-06: Anticipated delivery date 9-30-06
10-19-06: McGee provides cost estimate with recommendations for Committee, Committee Action is required to
proceed with Project.
(L-27) ~ COMPLETE - Order for new Sign at Entrance Lely MSTU US 41 at St. Andrews; Lykins quote for
$760,00 approved by Committee on July 20, 2006,
7-24-06: Staff request to purchase for Lykins in the amount of$760.00
8-17-06: Lykins installation of sign pending,
8-22-06: PO issued to Lykins for installation of sign, Installation to be complete by 2" week Sept.
8-31-06: Proof will be forwarded to Staff on 9-1-06 for review,
9-7-06; Darryl approved the proof,
9-22-06: Lykins begins installation of sign,
10-1-06: Lykins installation complete
(L-21) COMPLETE - Flag lighting ~ not working, ~
Anticipated completion date - September 30", 2006
8-17-06; Eb Simmonds contacted for lighting and flagpoles and took care of problem under contract ~ no fee
charged
10-10-06: Lights reported 100% operational by Committee Chairman
(L-I) ~ COMPLETE- Spraying of Exotic vegetation at St. Andrews Canal -Travis Gossard contacted regarding
request for re-spraying of exotics,
8-22-06: Danny Dominguez confirms that the re-spraying of the Canal has taken place,
(L -2) - COMPl.FTF--Painting of Curbs and Yellow Paint at Median Tips
6-15-06; Estimate for work approved minus purchase of material (paint), Staff to obtain material separate to
Commercial Land Maintenance proposal.
6-23-06: Requested Gerald Morris to let us know ~ R&B painting schedule and paint in stock?
7-6-06: Gerald emailed giving us an update on their painting schedule and asked J,Vliet to respond to us,
7-18-06; Spoke to John Vliet and he stated to make sure to use FDOT standards on paint and not to change
anything. Just repaint.
7-18-06; Will purchase paint at Sherwin Williams and provide to CLM,
7-20-06: Paint and materials dropped off to CLM
8-15-06: CLM performing painting, curbs completed, painting of numbers not complete
8-22-06: Project is completed,
(L-3) -COMPU':I'E -Sign Plantings of Crown of Thorn (Augusta at Forest Hill) - CLM directed to plant crown of
thorn at existing sign on July 20, 2006,
8-14-06: Inspection indicated that plantings had not occurred CLM contacted.
8-22-06: Plantings of Crown of Thorn is completed,
(L-4) ("aMPLE rE- Solar lighting - HOA Project - Augusta Boulevard at Forest Hill Sign Lighting Project- HOA
to fund installation, MSTU to pay for Yo of construction cost.
5-15-06: Pending Purchasing approval
5-30-06: Kent Tech is revising their estimate as per contract.
6-12-06: Kent tech has provided requested quote, item being processed by Finance/Purchasing
6
16'
A 14
(L-5) -COMPLETE-Lely Phase II- (Electrical & Lighting & Irrigation Controllers): - Construction Cost: EB
Simmonds Cost $23,010.00; Lumec Cost $17,050,00 ($1,550 per pole will poles) ~Total Project $40,060,00,
E,B, Simmonds is complete, FPL to power up Meter-pending,
5-1-06; FPL and EB Simmonds work complete,
(L-6) COMPLETE-Potable Water Meter Removal
(L 7) -COMPLETE-Repair of Asphalt on Forest Hill - COMPLETE; Andy Vanisak, Road & Bridge, performed
repairs to the area at no cost to the MSTU; Initial Repair Complete
(L-S) Flag Replacement- COMPLETU)-Flag Order for poles at St. Andrews and US 41
6-15-06; as per committee request the flags will be ordered twice a year or "as needed"
(L-9) -COMPLETE-Lely Phase 1- Complete (3/1/05)- COMPLETED
(L-l0) -COMPLETE-Drainage Project -Pebble Beach Road- Non-MSTU Project
(L-ll) -COMPLETE-Drainage Project -St. Andrews Boulevard-Embankment Cleaning- 100%
(L-12) COMPLETE-Baltusrol Culvert Inlet Clean-Out
5-12-06; Project Competed by Commercial Land Maintenance
(1,-13) -COMPLETE-Baltusrol Overpass Asphalt Repair - at the request of the Committee Chairman Road &
Bridge performed the repair.
3-10-06; Project Completed by Road & Bridge
(L-14) -COM PI, ETE-Baltusrol Tree near lift station; Committee requested staff investigate weather the tree
identified near the existing lift station was the responsibility of the MSTU to maintain as it was severely damaged
by Hurricane Wilma, had been subsequently removed by others, and a huge stump remained.
2-2-06; Investigation by Staff concludes that the tree stump is outside of the Right of way on Baltusrol and that
the tree is either on Golf Course Property or Lot owner at Lot 133 Baltusrol.
(L-15) COMPLETE- "Pinehurst Estates" Sign Area on Baltusrol Landscape Project; Refurbishment Project to
address the non-planted areas around the existing signs for the entrance into Pinehurst Estates-Lely MSTU Area,
5-5-06; Project Completed by Commercial Land Maintenance,
(L-16) COMPLETE-Doral Circle: Pepper Tree Removal
6-1-06: Road & Bridge Contacted concerning the removal of pepper tree within County Right of Way,
6-15-06; Pepper Tree reported removed
(L-17) -COMPLETE-Doral Circle Sign Lighting Project
3-15-06Project Completed by Kent Technologies under contract with Lely MSTU,
(L-lS) -COMPLETE-Doral Circle Bench Area Refurbishment Project. Committee directed staff to obtain quotes
for Commercial Land Maintenance to pressure clean pavers and apply protective sealant, replace decking on
benches, and reset shrubs in planted beds,
2-10-06; Project reported complete by Commercial Land Maintenance,
(L-19) - On Hold- Phase II Project; Advanced Bench Order and Installation; As per Committee request quote was
requested of Commercial Land Maintenance for the installation of benches to include storage, The order for the
benches was on hold due to the storage issue, As per the Bid Letting on June 5, 2006 and following Pre-Bid
meeting the benches are to be included in the bid for Phase II Project as an alternate,
(L-20) - COMPl.ETE -FLAG POLE REPLACEMENT-
7
16/
A 14
a, Received Quotes from annual contractors and other vendors, Lykens Sign Tech was low quote, Purchasing
recommended Lykens Sign Tech, committee cancelled project,
b, Committee has requested CLM to demolition existing poles and bases as per annual contract rates not to exceed
$2,500,00 after demolition, quotes will be requested from Sign Companies,
5-1-06; PO issue is pending as per Committee Approval.
5-15-06; Sign Craft received NTP on 5-12-06 and waiting on material order - drawing prepared,- 3 weeks
estimated for poles to be received,
6-12-06: flag poles to arrive within I week... On site meeting with contract to confirm locations,
6-15-06; Flag poles and all materials received by contractor; Installation to begin upon receipt of Permit from
Collier County Sign Permitting,
6-27 -06 : to be installed by June 30'h pending CDS review of construction pad
7-3-06: Flag Poles are up with flags, For 4th of July..!!!!
8
trl, II
..[ (,
14
..
'I
,
AG.TRONIX
SPECIAUIING IN MOTORQLA IRRIGATION CONTRQL SYSiEMS
1304 N. 15th STREET
IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142
239-657-5519
QUOTATION/PROPOSAL
DATE
QUOTE NO,
10/22/2007
815
CUSTOMER NAME
Collier County DOA TMfTransportation
2885 Horsesooe Drive South
Naples, H 34104
TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT
Net 30 SLT
ITEM DESCRIPTION aT'! PRICE TOTAL
12~ S-':OflllO ~C 16 ~[anon \\IRadlo In Sramle~s Sled
Enclosure
F284SA : \ IHF(451'-nlMllz, SCUrplO ~(' 2m Suut" tlT7'-;U 2 1.325.00 2,650,00
I rLN2154A Radio
Scorpio AC un Expill1sion Kit 2 225.00 450,00
I F2805A Scorpio V2 AC :2 ini8 out 2 800,00 1.600,00
800-0365 12v Power Supply LDASOF 4.3mnp 2 100,00 200,00
800-7106 H~IN-5 AC Powel 'able 2 0,00 0,00
SOO-711 \ ' H~OU-9 DC Power Cal~le 2 0,00 0,00
SB-18SS SS Enclosure 18W X 36H X 11D 2 1.290,00 2.580.00
PED-ISSS SSPedestals 18\VX 12HX 10D 2 375.00 750.00
:VILB-S-AC Surge Protector AC liD/Sout 4 266.50 L066,OO
X5836 Low Profile Ant UHF 450-470 tvlllZ 2 90,00 180,00
51020-WM Ll;;::vitOll Surge Protection 2 189,00 378,00
8299-A W (iF! W/Switch Leviron (15Amp) 2 39.00 78,00
]-11 Single Gang Box 2 3.99 7.98
Thilllk you for jOur business. TOTAL
$9.939,98
QCOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS,
SIGNATURE
161
A 14
AG~TRONIX
SPECIAUIING IN MOTO~LA IRRIGATION CONTROL SmEMS
1304 N. 15th STREET
IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142
239-657-5519
QUOTATION/PROPOSAL
DATE
QUOTE NO,
10/22/2007
S16
CUSTOMER NAME
Collier Cmillry DOA TMITransportation
2885 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples. Fl. 34104
TERMS
REP
SHIP VIA
PROJECT
:.Jet 30
SLl
ITEN!
DESCRIPTION
QTY
PRICE
TOTAL
I F2948A
I MLB,S- DC
~4962
I-Scorpio DC 8 Station \v,iRadio in Green Steel Powder
Coated Enclosure
, ,,-SO)2 Enclosure wiHood. bru.:kpaneL wi20\V Solar Paneli UHF I 1,9S0'OOl 1.9S0,OO
!710-1300 Antenna, Wi!VloLltlting Template
12v Battery (25AHl SealeJ 1 89,00 SQOO
, I
I
I
I Note: This enc1amre 11a<; solar panel huilt Inside. I
I 1
It's been a pleasure working with you! TOTAL
$3,no.oo
UHF(450-470r-Hh) Scorpio DC 21N/80UT
Surge Protector DC :2 INiS OUT
Sunsaver 6 Voltage Regulator
I
II
:\
\360.00
241.00
50,00
1.360,00
24 LOa
50,\l0
QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS,
SIGNATURE
AG~TRONIX
SPECIAUIING IN MOTOROLA IRRIGATION CONTROL SYSTEMS
1304 N, 15th STREET
IMNfOKALEE, FL. 34142
239-657-5519
161 A 14
QUOl A liON/PROPOSAL
DATE
QUOTE NO,
10/22/2007
817
CUSTOMER NAME
Collier COMty DOA TMfTransportation
2885 Horseshoe Drive South
'Japles. FI. 34104
TERMS
REP
SHIP VIA
?ROJECT
Net 30
SU
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
QTY
PRICE
TOTAL
l~Scorpio CC g StaUl\O \viRadio in Stainiess Steel
Enclosure
1'2948,1 I L'HFl450-470MI-tzJ SCllrpiu DC 2JN/80UT 1 1.360,00 1.360,00
MLB-8-DC SUf2:C Protector DC 2 L'J/S OUT 11 :~LOO I 241.00
34962 I Sl.lll-saver 6 Voltage Regulator I II ,0,00 50.01}
SB- I 8SS I 5S Enclosure 18\V X 36[-[ X 12D Ii 1,290.001 J,290,OO \
PED- 18SS SS Pcdesrais 18\V ~\ 2JJX IOj) I I' 375,00 \ 375.on
BSP2012 20Wart Solar P,illd :1 219.00 219,00
SPB~m Solar Pm-lei Brack0t \ 55.00, 55,00
85836 i Low Protile .J..nt UHF 450-470 1\111-1] I 90,00 90,00
710- I 3110 ! ] lv Battery (25 AI-!) Sealed 1 89,00 89,()1l
I Collier COllnty standard cabinct wi solur panel mount
,
It's been a pleasure working with you! TOTAL
$3,769,IlO
QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS,
SIGNATURE
161
A
14
,"'"
II
Commercial Land Maintenance
Full Service Landscape Management
. u,/~~. ,NO.
,._,....~^.~~-
',"
3980 Exchange Ave. . Naples, FL 34104
Office: (239) 643.6205 . Fax: (239) 643.5012
E-mail: commland@aol.com
CUSTOMER NO,
BILL TO:
_'.."c:. ,....>J.....,i,l,..v ~,t..,;~4.. ti, ,i ".d..,.;,). c..;
,~..,....,....;;.. . , .,..-1 '
'j
.'-'....J..'.'.
...,.."..,-.'
;.., I. i',i'<....!, "__'~,,,"_, J>../I,"'L,._JII.I\:J I\HLU,j'.;,';', i UL.'"
I '" \J:".' \~, .J-I
;.'-'i
".
L""..J____.',; ,-',;,-" ;; ;...,,-(1: ,_,.f,:.;)";. ....,,'11 ;;~. '.... .--!'-....'....
h\,.~'p C".".
;L','.J
..;(.U;.i.l..;
\...:..J.,.;L,'v dU", ii\;:.tll..ji. .'~' .",'l..U"
'i.-,""""
-j jG.~;,
i .:?u (_~.:.
~>..i _ -..H i'.>l .i ,,-,( ~.;, ",",; 'il ..' -I;
, .:.::).~,
'.~)':""~-J ..:..8
nu.J;"v(, i 1,.;;'::'; ii 1;<';;:_.\, JUl)',;.;l ';1
_",}l~;;
C'J ,iL;l,.j;
;i\~ J.jUlJ/;,''':i h
...........'t
~_'.r~' .u<-
'J
,/, lllWiti'_" 1..l..II, liLhJr L-:.,,1'-"1 tV \l~,->l_..il
~'U
'...1'-_,
~
\~~
~\
TOTAL
.,""
~_"i, l .. J, ,
THANK VOU' WE APPRECIATE 1'0UR BUSINESS
PLEASE NOTE PAI'MENTTERMS ON REVERSE SIDE
1,5'7, WILL BE ADDED MONTHLl' TO AU INVOICES OVER 30 DA)'S UNTIL PAID
161
A
1b
....".
1m
Commercial Land Maintenance
Full Service Landscape Management
,NO.
I" i i i\/ ' - ,~.
3980 Exchange AVe. . Naples. FL 34104
Office: (239) 643-6205 . Fax: (239) 643-5012
E-mail: commland@aol.com
CUSTOMER NO,
BILL TO:
"-rU"if.(,;. ,.,,,,'-Jilt.)'
'i. . ~ ,',\1 ;;~lc,',.)t i ,1,__" J~ j
...., '" ~ .-
;',.,l..h~
:ii .....
..,
'......d
.'--"',.
.,.'.,;....:i\L_v,;..j;. .'... Lt_"",""
r,;: _,_;iH!\;.
,,";, ,;1.....',,,1 i
...:J
'::'Ui-.:";;;l\',...,i I..d} '_'I iij. i'~ ,,'J',-'._ ,:'<i '_~'!,~)'<;i1,~<;k.. ',Jil\i ,i..llJjj",
;;jL\fd;
:;"I.\Yi
":'.Ut;'" ,
ido.:.li",HI'
.-:!\'~il:i,'
i,-.:F~j
(.l,',: Ifl\:J'i lid',,'\.:, '.. ...."... . .;jji",(..';\.l,.
,.";'I"U..,.,j . I.H,'"", <_ ","'....'''''.
L I -.r. _j~
~'.)LH l,v ~_,-~;, -1(.:.(; 1,_, ;- .
'd,;.;,c;,'id;
'..' ,',,1 )1;. ~l~t;..
1 ,'_'U<_'.w
:Iv.l,l'i ,\(.j~,_ ,"'. ..j''''''''_.Lh '._', :,jG,i.~\..".il. '."."i,-"
..:-'.,
.'.'1.., .. ,~! ;;',...
1;..."'.,'.>1....."
'C"J
~. .i, i.J
K
t
\\\ t\ dl
TOTAL
~.., " . . ;
THANK rou' WE APPRECIATE !'OUR BUSINESS
PLEASE NOTE PAYMENT TERMS ON REVERSE SIDE
1,5% WILL BE ADDED MONTHLY TO ALL INVOICES OVER 30 DAYS UN71L PAID
m
BILL TO:
161
A 14
Commercial Land Maintenance
Full Service Landscape Management
NO.
,,:1,....'
3980 Exchange Ave. . Naples, FL 34104
Offfce: (239) 643.6205 . Fax: (239) 643-5012
E-mail: commfand@aol.com
CUSTOMER NO,
",.,~",-- - <:.-. ., _.-, ,
/; l.
"_',/:;:,\..:;1,,
.<..
.' ..;;~ ,_' i. 'Jh:' '-" i'~i . j ;1.dli "
\.(:.,.
, ,'., '~. '-~ , ."
'",:"" -;;A \ ~,U~ii
,J...'.0"
.JJ.Li;..J
~/
~\f
TOTAL
:.1
THANK l'OU' WE APPRECIATE YOUR BUSINESS
PlEASE NOTE PAYMENT TERMS ON REVERSE SIDE
1,5'7< WILL BE ,IDDED MONTHLY TO ALL INVOICES OVER 30 DAIS UNTIL PAID
161
A
14
q~4J~\~Lj
P.O. BOX 280196 . TAMPA, FL 33682
239-597-9500 . FAX: 813-949-2540
E-mail: mail@floridaplay.com
j\n/0'"!\V,,:-::ai(:{~':,~av!':sa..~:cm
TO: Collier Co. Transportation Dept. - ATM
2885 Horseshoe Dr, S
Naples, FL 34104
239-252-5840
Fax: 239-530-6219
Other Office Locations:
Naples, Gainesville. Orlando, Palm Beach
Lely MSTU
QUOTATION # 11115
Playground Equipment, Site Furnishings, Bleachers & Shade Struc1ures
Altn: Tessie Sillery
tessiesi Ilery@colliergov,net
Date: November 15, 2007
Shlo Date: Approx: 4-6 Weeks ARO
Terms: Net 15 Davs
F.O.B.: Destination
Salescerson: Dan Swartz 597-9500
Sl1looed Via: CC
Quantitv Descriction I Unit Price Total :
DuMor I
1 #143-60PL 6' Recycled Plastic Bench wi Cast Iron Supports :$ 684,00 $ 684,00
(Redwood Plastic wi Black Frame)
I Less 5% Discount (per Citrus County S,8, Bid#2006-41) $ (34,20)
$ 649,80 I
Shipping & Handling $ 144,00,
TOT AL PR~C:: $ 793.80 .
I I I
I I
I Price based on Citrus Co, S,B, Bid #2006-41 i
I
Price does not include off-loading, assembly or installation, I
:
I Price valid tor 30 days. I
;
Thank you,
-l~~-llJJlJJ-l-lO~Oo~o~crS:OOZ:2:morZoom~oZ-loo-l~-l~ZOO
Omm~CC~~:l> ~-lm-l~Q~C~oo:l>r-l~OCZ m~:l>:l> ~m-lmc
~oooo:l>OO:l>~~~mI~IZIar~C-l~Ia-~Q~Q~~~z~<mr~
~~~ffiffiffiffiffi~o~~I~~~oo~~~~~~oo~~~~~oo~~oooo~~~~
m<<~-l-l~-lr~~oms:~B~ rz oOo~ml ~~~~~coo<
c::mm~-l-l~Oos:z~~_u, mo~Qo~-lzoo rn~oo~~m-l:l>:;:;
gOO~o~~oo~cmQmlJJ~:l>s:;ll ;omo::;1zmOQo '.-loo;O;O~~~-lrr
!!l ~o~~ ~~zm~~ma~s: ~Qoo ~zg~~z;o~~~;o~~?<~~
oZoooo c~~~~mFo~~ oo~~ :l>o-lmmc::mo;o~OOComm
o~-l:l> ~ Qmzs:~~mm ~m< oo~oo;om<oooS:S:~oS:s:
z o~ z mZQ ZlJJZ~ s:~~ ~m~ zOQ-l:l>cr-l-l
-l o~ 0 zOO m_:l>- :l> ZS: -l :l>~~r:l>?<
O~ 0 m Ozz:l> ~r:l>~ ;o~mx~ mx
Z coor ~ r~lJJ lJJ-mzo;omo
~ r ~ 00 mOO ~ Fe ~ 0 ~
~~~~~t:f::~~t&~~1;ltt
161 A
N N N N N ~ - - - - - - -
. W N _ 0 ~ m ~ ~ ~ . W N
. .
. ..
G m ~ ~ ~ . W N -
~~~~~~~~~~Q~~~M~~~~~~~W~~W
fRtltEflEflEflEflEfl
""I>
"'all>
""c3
o 0. CD
~ "
oCDo.
o_~
o
o
.... "''''~
............ 1'.)1\)......'"
(J'I(1ICOOlNNN............m -Ilo-(J)
mmoco~1.nu.1.n1.ni:D......oo
ooooooogoc.nooo
oeOOOOO 00000
0000000000000
0000000000000
..,,'"
oo>N" mm.......O'I-...J
O1omoo..oooo:':'
00000000000
00000000000
660.06606000
00000000000
N N
..........0 0
-....I we>> -...J
oo.u.-......OJco
O'l 0,"010
!=" 0000
0",,0000
0010.,909
'"
.."
o
~
o
o
o
o
Efl fR 4:Jl W fR Efl Efl tit (:fl fFl (jl 'J) j) ';! ',J.! I.. '/. ;'"1 (,) ,',iI
" 'j) VI fi' ('1 .... W Efl W Efl W -ER -M
fREflEflEflWfREflW_~EflWEflWEflEflEflEflEflWWWEflWEfl4:Jl_EflEflEflEflEflEflW4:JlWEflm
)(
_ _CD:l>
~w_.!" ......::::J n
f\.)w,J:t. --::::.-......9:2'
~~g;o8~t!!..
. . . . . . ...
WN-...I-...JCOOCD
NCOOO>O"'U.
--- --
~
"' ,'....
0 , ,
co ~, C)
W :,-) n i'
0' ") ,j) . ~)
en "
..
I:
...
...
..
'"
o
...
N
I I Q
..
'" '"
"'''''''
<0"'0>
e,.,,,,~
"'0>'"
;'}J c-.
-- ())
" " en
;" (-', co,
" ~2
D
'"
0>
'"
'"
'"
'" ~
N,J:l..~N
OtO-..J-..J
.tlo.OCOc.n
i:nw~~
Q)NWN
..
~
l!l
W
-0>
~
.."
en
53
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_~~~~~~~~w~
...
.....~~
..."''''
Qlmm
,",00
11I00
000
"00
"''''
I\,)I\,)~~C:O
"',...,............0'1
(.n<.n(.nu,O,......
8ggg~g
OOOOWO
OOOomo
"'O>~
.~-..Jm
~...O>
0""'"
i:>>~i\J
0>"''''
'"
o
o
o
o
o
~ ~
00>
am
00
00
00
00
"'~ -
0I(J'l......c.n........,I:lo.-..J
.Jlo.-:....,<.noo~coo
O<OOOOOc.nO
OO'lCOOQOOO
6~i:no66:"""6
O.Jlo.(x)OOO~O
I_I\:) 'i\3 - >-
......~ 0 m ~-4Q1
(.oJ 0'1 ...... W:--J en 0 -.
.c.>><.n:....ootof.vw-..J ......-:.:a.litii'
.....OW(J10COW.Jlo. o.$:lo.-a"
P'!=,"'!='~~9~9~:'-' i"
.....O.Jlo.OO(,.)NW-..JCOCO
00909N0)8mo~
~~'5:S:~~~ooo<
<a()Q)"'U~OOQ.(DCD
~(J) C)::J reD ::!.3 =Q.:J
......omO U1Q.3CD-:Q.
- C ro m - m .... en CD
5".... :::J -<_(1)(1 "'"
oORo "'00 Z
-t' CD >- :;tJ~. -. C Q)
o (/I mm~::J 3
..... eft o!:!". r.;t CD
)> g ~g~c
r- ~ o.~
~;:;,~g>m~.g>~~~iO
:::J;:a.:J 0 ~ 5..::.!.::J a::J 31
o=a.....;:.+O:Jo..('D:::!: _
CD N" rn CD :::!. ~ ~ (J) ....::J ~
(f)~2~Q. ro@QofO :0
c a -.-< ...."'C 0
< s~ s,:mg> .
CD '.0 en ~. s: ~ en
'< CD :::JWCD
:2 r+~....
"" , {; l' "" , " " :0 n
, <
co :; ,-:0
N >-.~ :c. " .:::~
'0 ,-, .~) ex> , '-:") 'n C1 ~ d
00 en en , ,'S f;., (.J '"
W '::) ~ 0 , J', , " ~
'" ::) 0 ~.:J '"
on .:")) 0 r)
.fIt{;A.~ '-f) tfltfltfltfltfltfl tR >
'tin
..-
-. c
o.!!!.
'"
o
...
N
o
'"
.."
0'"
"'0
"'~
'" '"
"'0>
"'...
0><0
"'0
ww
"''''
",,,,0
o
3
3
g
CD
"
Ii!"
14.
z
o
<
CD
3
CT
CD
..
....
JJ1
'"
o
o
~
"fir
c~
Z-(
Os::
....CJ)
U1-i
"'c
~~
()Ol:E-ltll
O::J;::;:O~
::JO-:::Tacn
::J 0 -. m
CD 0 7 c..n m
~ ti ::J.~_
~o""~NO
Q)..., 1_
CD~-o ""0 AI
~. CD::O AI
~m(/)~C5
~~~~~
N~m""O::!
g~Cil~O
CD ;::;:co 0 Z
. :::Tc:"'"
-l _o~
~, ~ ~ ~ ~m
::J '< ..., 0
Q.Q.Q)""OAI
5.~5.;o>
<D:Exxl;;
~mJ...en
-roo~
-0 ..., ~ ffi"
-C. 5" Ul Ul
5" Q- ::T 0>
co 0 c: =
m7"""O
000
~ =1:'0
'" a. '
~<DC
~<'O
& o. (/)
<D'O
0~D3
<D ' '<
xCll;;r
en. en CD
!::!:-im
::J::J0.
COo 0'
O'l:lo
c: -.9-
O'<D-
Q:",
<D -,
~ ~
-i
o
-i
)>
~
>
Z
C
Ul
o
)>
-0
m
Il"
iii
;u
-Ul
Clc
~g
os.
Z!!!.
tIlUl
)>CD
Ulll
m ci' ~
tIl:l 0
0:0
:;'
~
...
o
"''''
~
~ ~ ~
o C:o 00
0000
0090
"'00
000
~~~~~
~~
S:CIlClltllIUl;U~
C&.&.om:{.Qo
r cB3c(I)O-
OtD.,;m CD C"-'<
:r:~05"5J.g~
mQriil~-o-m.m
c: mmQ)(i)...,cr
f3 3Q)<DaJg~
.:< -ci)~c-.""
-0 _.- :JJD@
C 3=Dg.:!!m
'" 0 :E 0 OJ-
to ffim~;o~
CD ~=1....0><
::J _"T1 '< m
a. war 0)--
~ co cr ""0 ""0
m c: m m
~!!l- 33
o;w I\.)~
=co 0 ~
Ol ,- 0
;?; - I\.) m
"'!'
~~ o:r:
~ ~ m-
C
<D
'0
g
'"
o
c
""
0'
Ol
co
'"
~;;r
o '-
, '"
0'0
, "
c..n~~ ~
0000l1\.)
000-.10>
tIlUlCllmm
Q)".mBl
co ~ ~.
'"
-E,B-E,B-E,Biflt.4
Ul
C
0-
,...
o
[
Ul
CD
"
,...
O.c..nOOCDCD
:J o:""'wC:.nC:.n
=0001\.)00
t.4t.4t.4t.4t.4t.4
00 '" ~
OOl ~Ol~
OOO-.lI\.).,I:l.CD
009N!=O~:--J
OlOOOc..nO
000000
~
o
o
I....
,-0
...0
qfJ
o
o
-0
-0- ~
.,::!;!)>
-OlZ
3::J-i
III ~
c:!I:
:1, )>
~-i
~m
0' ;u
m ;;:
~
Oul
:;'
o
E
a.
<D
0'
Ol
o
,,-
~
~
"'0
mm
Ol Ol
"''''
.... '"
0'"
0'"
00
00
"''''
~ '"
-~ f.J
0'"
99
00
00
161
Ol
::J
a.
0-
~
~:-cnc
, CD .,
~;;
;U'U-_'"
CD...,-Ig~
3<Dm ...
'0 --
OBlOmC=
<mm-.-
Ol !l:CLCl
o~"O;:; ....
-<Dr-CD
CD _ - 3
xo-i
en"..., --
!:!:-o 0
::J -ZCD
co ~ .
-0 !::!: ""'0 n
or::J AI:3.
::J co m"
_Ul""'O!:t.
'" -)> 0
:C~AI:::I
<D ~ )>
~ ::J -i
::J 0 _
~roO
m _Ul Z
~""Q.):Io
_OlZ
~ ~ 0
"'OlC
OJ=:>-
::J a.
0.--0
oQo
~ '"
'" '0 )>
~~r-
0=4;
::1i o.
o Ol
Q)!::
!::!:o
o ::J
::J '"
~-
'0
iil
:a
:;'
co
'"
g
3
x'
'0
~
'"
'0
<D
o
=;;
o'
OJ
~
6'
::J
~
...
o
o
o
~
"
'"
ul
c
~
[
ul
CD
"
=:0
0'
:I'"
o
"''''
~ ~
-", '"
00
99
00
00
A14
C
o
~
~
o
iii
o
~
m
Z
o
~
:J:~
tIlm
c~
,,-<
"Cl
mO
;u~
~"
)>m
Zul
C-i
ul)>
O-i
)>m
-oul
m-
1l"!I:
_ul
;u-i
;UC
i5
~
o
Z
;u
m
Z
o
;;
-i
o
Z
o
C
:I
::;:
C
:I
::;:
o
o
III
,...
C
CD
III
cD.
:I
-0
~
o
;'
III
III
o.
:I
!!!.
Ill.
o
"
S'
o.
:I
9,
o
o
III
,...
....
o
![
o
o
..
-
~
00
'" CD
" n
o 0
aD1
<" ~
'" CD
00
g 0
" =
CD ~
co!.
"CD
'" "
::J CD
" =
'" n
OlCD
;:l:
'C
'"
,
::J
o
CD
.(Jl
"Q
iil
::J
(Jl
III
::J
a.
0-
,
(Jl
"Q
'"
"
~
0'
!!t
6'
::J
.e
r;
z
o
en
o
>
~!!!
llOiil
-3:
;u>
~-l
C'lm
!i~
iS~
zen
-l-l-len
OOoc
-4-1-1st
>>>!l.
r-r-r-A>>
mmmcn
>>>CD
enenenn .."
mmm~~
mmmO 0
___::I
000=0
"H" '"
~
~....lI.O<OW
~....lI.VJ"""""'"
...... 0 -....... (,.) 01
<000000
VJQ)(1'lOO
0,0,000
00000
'"
o
o
r
"
'"
~
en
O;u-;:;:;~
CD CD ~ m
o i>> a.
Q _. c: 3:
~=.~.)>
-.::s --.....
~ a:a ~ ~
m:e 0'-
'" Dl '" >
te=(f)r-
'" III en
3 m
III
::J
![
CD
6'
"
'"
;u
'"
6i
S'
S
co
~
~
'C
~
::J
o
CD
!"
"Q
iil
::J
(Jl
III
::J
a.
Q
(Jl
"Q
'"
"
~
0'
!!t
6'
::J
.e
~
o
o
*'
(Jl
c:
"Q
'Q.
iii'
a.
I/<>
CD
'"
o
m
"
'"
Ol
?'
o
o
'"
'"
.CD
<Xl
o
o
o
o
161
-
o
,
....lI.~(I)C
, CD Dl
~S'
m;u'U--'"
oco...,-tg.....a.
=3.g m_~
l'DoQ)ODJ~
~~mm-a.-
"'_ 3: 0
~o~O.."'"
--mr-CD
1(1)_-3
-(~.Q--
.g gJ,lE 00
U)::lmZCD
o co = (II
=-0 _" n
en Di"~ ^'~.
C ::l ..., m
:gur::J"'Og
=_ 0 > =
'" "Q CD ;u
O-CDw)>
Qo ....., - ....
::J"Q _
5'!2.iilO
en CD::l Z
m!ll (I)
;;C"Q III >z
,. -::J
a.~e:c
(/) Q c
mw(i)
a -0 "'0
-"'0
0"
..., =h
UI 0')>
-g~r-
" 0
=+;::l
o'~
III
~
6'
::J
.e
'"
III
S'
(Jl
![
ro
a.
"Q
i3
a.
c:
n.
"Q
'"
,
"Q
iil
::J
(Jl
I/<>
(Jl
"Q
'"
"
~
0'
III
~
6
::J
.e
....
o
010
"'0
om
~'n
"''''
en
C
~
-
!!!.
en
CD
nw
-..,,~
o' 0 0
=00
'" '" '"
Ol"'....
~-.c:a.o
000
"''''0
000
000
A
14
o
o
~
....
o
;ij
o
....
m
z
o
;u
-l
:I:....
mm
c:....
,,-<
"C'l
mO
;u....
r;-n
zm
oen
en-l
o!i
>m
"'llen
m-
1lO3:
_en
;u-l
;uC:
15
>
-l
is
z
;u
m
z
o
<
!i
is
z
o
c:
=
;::;:
c:
=
;::;:
o
CD
..
ciS'
=
"'ll
a
;'
..
..
0'
=
!!!.
..-
o
"Q
oj"
0'
=
o
-
o
o
..
~
o
o
..
-
....
o
[
o
~
~
RECEIVED
IAN 'l II 2008
10 r
A f5- c_
f~,Y'i"! J'
COLLIER COUNTY LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD
:"lOnN ,;o,,,,,,,ss,,,ous Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 9:30 a.m.
Headquarters Library
AGENDA
Fiala Jl\.hv ~
Halas './ ~______
Henni ng_~_J7____,_____,
Coyle -:7 -ktr1 Pc-
Coletta .~~--
Call to order
Approval of Minutes
Literacy Program Report
Report of Officers
Communications
a - Written
b ., Personal
Unfinished Business
1. Employee ofthe Month - Jan '08
2. Golden Gate Library construction
3. South Regional Library construction
4. ENNB Closing Controversy
New Business
General Considerations
Director's Report
Report of the Friends
Adjournment
Mise, Comls I ~ I (t \ &)
Date:
Item#:
COPies to:
j
16/
If
11)
Naples, Florida, December 12,2007
LET IT BE KNOWN that the LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD met on this date in
regular session at 9:30 a.m, in the Main Library with the following members present:
CHAIR: Doris 1. Lewis
VICE-CHAIR: Loretta Murray
Karen Louwsma
Andrew Reiss
ABSENT: Connie L. Bettinger-Hennink
ALSO PRESENT: Marilyn Matthes, Library Director
Roberta Reiss, Literacy Coordinator
Linda Fasulo, Library Public Relations
Luz Pietri, Administrative Assistant
Don Beach, Member, PC Bug Group
Bill Grieve, Member, PC Bug Group
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mrs, Lewis asked for comments or corrections to the minutes of October 23,2007. There
being none, Mrs, Louwsma moved, seconded by Mrs, Murray and carried unanimously,
that the minutes be approved as submitted.
Mr. Don Beach and Mr. Bill Grieve, members of the PC Bug Computer Group were in
attendance, They were here to protest the enforcement of the Library Meeting Rules as
written in the Library Policies, which would allow greater access to more groups wanting
to use the facilities, After some discussion, Mrs, Matthes agreed to let this group have
access to the meeting room for their February and March meetings and to try to re-
schedule the group's meeting in January,
LITERACY PROGRAM REPORT
Mrs, Reiss spoke about all the new programs coming up this season. She also stated that
more tutors have been trained and have surpassed the total from last year by 20.
REPORT OF OFFICERS - None
COMMUNlCA nONS
Mrs. Lewis wanted to commend the Friends ofthe Library on the smashing success of the
recent Gala Event.
Mr. Reiss stated that he had recently received a call frorn the Sheriffs Office to tell him
that the Naples Regional Library appeared to be left unlocked. (His name appears first on
v
161
A 15
a list of LAB members with their phone numbers which is posted by the Library's main
entrance, Mrs, Matthes said the list would be removed since this information can now be
found in the Library's website.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
The Board reviewed the nominations submitted for selection of the Library's Employee
of the Month, Mrs, Murray moved, seconded by Mrs. Louwsma and carried
unanimously, to select Mona Vega, Library Assistant at the Golden Gate Branch, as
EOM for November 2007. Then, Mr. Reiss moved, seconded by Mrs. Louwsma and
carried unanimously, to select Michelle Ramkissoon, Library Assistant at the Naples
Regional, as EOM for December 2007.
In reference to the Golden Gate Library construction, Mrs. Matthes reported that the
construction has been progressing at a rnuch faster pace than anticipated and that it's
expected to be finished by March 2008.
In reference to the South Regional Library, Mrs, Matthes stated that construction there is
also progressing rapidly,
NEW BUSINESS - None
GENERAL CONSIDERA TrONS - None
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Mrs. Matthes stated that the Immokalee CLIC Grant had been approved by the State, She
also stated that the Rose Hall Construction Grant application had ranked 4th out of26
with the State, The Collection Development and the Meeting Room Policies had also
been approved by the County. Lastly, Mrs, Matthes reported that a patron had
complained about a picture in a story about Christmas. Mrs. Matthes handed out copies
of her reply to the patron.
REPORT OF THE FRIENDS - None
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Library Advisory Board, Mr. Reiss
moved, seconded by Mrs. Louwsma and carried unanimously, that the meeting be
adjourned, Time: l0:45 a.m.
APPROVED BY:
C"'-'.~
\)OVJ_o \
r
<~
Doris 1. Lewis v
Chair, Library Advisory Board
~ \ \'
,: ialC! 'J~}~ ' A, .
'. I ~ L ~!' "t"
i-'la a::- ._.' ", .._._.~,_M~__
',"Ien"'jng /f:. ___. .._.m
,"'.'.-.~.~.
.oylc .m.\"~
,;olett3 cre-'.....' -,
161
A 16
PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION
Municipal Services Taxing and Benefit Unit
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 6,2008
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES
DIVISION BOARD AT HAMMOCK OAK CENTER, 8960 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES,
FLORIDA 34108 ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 2008 AT 1:00 P.M.
1, RollCall
2, Approval of Minutes of the January 9, 2008 Meeting
3, Audience Participation
4 Chairman's Report
Vacant Position on the Board
Foundation Incorporation Steering Committee
Foundation Strategic Planning Committee
Budget Committee
Resurfacing Pathways on Myra Janco Daniels Boulevard
Status, Fishing Pier, Vanderbilt Beach
5, Committee Reports
Clam Bay Committee Report
Educational Video
Review of Clam Bay Annual Report
Clam Bay Permit Extension
Mangroves along the Berm
Budget Committee
No Report
Government Relations
No Report
6, Administrator's Report
Pathway Capital Options
Pelican Bay Services Division Office Space Lease
District Offices LLC Proposal
7, Capital Projects
Median Improvements - Myra Janco Daniels Boulevard
Sidewalk Lighting - Myra Janco Daniels Blvd & Vanderbilt Beach Road
Community Issues
Sidewalk Repairs
Hurricane Charley Storm Damage
8, Committee Requests
9, Audience Comments
10. Adjourn
SPEAKERS FROM THE AUDIENCE WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES
ADDITIONALLY, THIS NOTICE ADVISES THAT, IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY
DECISION MADE BY THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD, WITH RESPECT TO
ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A
VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE
TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED, ANY PERSON
REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS AT THIS MEETING BECAUSlf.1fSlf~SABILlTY Mb
OR PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT SHOULD CONTACT THE DIVISION OFFICE AT (2Mj"5~-1749 AT '
LEAST FIVE CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING, Date_l Co { It I ~
Item#:
,- C ):85 te
J
j';:;, '~~:_-eO""R eou"", PUB"e VE",CCE ADVISORY eOMMI~.6 I It J-?
,~~~~~ng-~'ID~ AGENDA
'::o!et'Bate:~Fii6-ruiii;Y 4,2008 at 9:30 A.M.
Location: Collier County Community Development Services Building, 2800 N, Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL,
Conference Room # 609 / 61 0
NOTICE: PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK AT THE MEETING NEED TO COMPLETE A "REQUEST
TO SPEAK" FORM. SPEAKERS MAY BE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR DISCUSSION
UNLESS ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY THE COMMITTEE.
ALL PARTIES PARTICIPATING IN THE PUBLIC MEETING NEED TO SPEAK ONE AT A TIME AND
STATE THEIR FULL NAME AND COMPANY THEY REPRESENT, IF APPLICABLE, SO THAT THE
COURT REPORTER CAN RECORD ALL STATEMENTS BEING MADE.
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD
OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT
A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THAT
TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
PLEASE ENSURE ALL PAGERS AND CELL PHONES ARE OFF OR IN A QUIET POSITION,
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. Roll Call
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
3, APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 7, 2008
4, COMPLAINT REPORT -- Michaelle Crowley
5. NEW BUSINESS
A. New Applications
1. Always on Time Limo, LLC - New CTO. Owner: Mario A. Gonzalez
2. Paradise Airport Rides - New CTO. Owner: Elius Merisnor
3. Express Taxi, Inc. - New CTO. Owner: Ricot Dieujuste
4. SW Cab -- New CTO. Owner: Jean B. Aristil
5. American Taxi - New CTO. Owner: Pierre Jean Louis
6. Bonita Bee Airport Express Service, LLC -- New Ownership. Owner: Scott A. Fox
7. Doris Limousine Service -- New CTO. Owner: William R. Harrop
8. MBA Airport Transportation, LLC -- New CTO. Directors: Mary E. Poelker,
Judith L. Griffin, and John J. Poelker
B. Change of Name
1. Carriage Limousine, LLC -- (from MM Limo, LLC).
Owner: Mostafa Motamad
6. OLD BUSINESS
A. What constitutes a VFH?
B. Request for Legal Opinion re front plate logo on Subcontracted cars
7. SPEAKERS
Mise, ComlS r L, (tl 11
8. NEXT MEETING DATE: March 3, 2008
Dete:
9. ADJOURN
item#:
"::-l;':!S to
j
COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC VEHICLE ADVISOR
A:b,
'i'
..
'f"" \",,\'
,-'~'~, )
AGENDA
; (~r~
Date: February 4,2008 at 9:30 A.M, "",,,, . .",",..,0, "0
Location: Collier County Community Development Services Building, 2800 N, Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL,
Conference Room # 609 / 61 0
NOTICE: PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK AT THE MEETING NEED TO COMPLETE A "REQUEST
TO SPEAK" FORM. SPEAKERS MAY BE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR DISCUSSION
UNLESS ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY THE COMMITTEE.
ALL PARTIES PARTICIPATING IN THE PUBLIC MEETING NEED TO SPEAK ONE AT A TIME AND
STATE THEIR FULL NAME AND COMPANY THEY REPRESENT, IF APPLICABLE, SO THAT THE
COURT REPORTER CAN RECORD ALL STATEMENTS BEING MADE.
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD
OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT
A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THAT
TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
PLEASE ENSURE ALL PAGERS AND CELL PHONES ARE OFF OR IN A QUIET POSITION.
1. CALL TO ORDER Fiala '~..l\,J.yry
Halas ..z:-~.~-_...
A. Roll Call Henning.~-,,--_.,...,..-_.
Coyle _?~LL ','
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Coletla4:-G_..,__.
3, APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 7, 2008
4. COMPLAINT REPORT -- Michaelle Crowley
5. NEW BUSINESS
A. New Applications
1. Always on Time Limo, LLC - New CTO. Owner: Mario A. Gonzalez
2. Paradise Airport Rides - New CTO. Owner: Elius Merisnor
3. Express Taxi, Inc. - New CTO. Owner: Ricot Dieujuste
4. Naples Cab -- New CTO. Owner: Jean B. Aristil
5. American Taxi - New CTO. Owner: Pierre Jean Louis
6. Bonita Bee Airport Express Service, LLC -- New Ownership. Owner: Scott A. Fox
7. Doris Limousine Service -- New CTO. Owner: William R. Harrop
8. MBA Airport Transportation, LLC -- New CTO. Directors: Mary E. Poelker,
Judith L. Griffin, and John J. Poelker
B. Change of Name
1. Carriage Limousine, LLC -- (from MM Limo, LLC).
Owner: Mostafa Motamad
6. OLD BUSINESS
A. What constitutes a VFH?
B. Request for Legal Opinion re front plate logo on Subcontracted cars
7. SPEAKERS
8. NEXT MEETING DATE: March 3, 2008
Mise Com!S: lle ( Pc: \ 1
9. ADJOURN
Date:
Item#:
i :1'; tc
/
Fiala -- --- -.
Halas _..-.-:\\~---- -- ,.
Henning- ,5'_.1'-..-.----
Coyle :;:::--
Coletta- .
:F1.
A FE,
.-----"....."", 8Me. M.s.7.1i.",e ,,;;;
16/
f)
,:"",;;;:".;:;)lle(s
AdviSOry ao".".itt..
270!) Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, FL :-{4104
December 6, 2007
AGENDA
I. Call Meeting to Order
II. Attendance
III. Approval of Agenda
IV. Approval of Minutes: November 1, 2007
V. Transportation Services Report
A. Budget Report - Caroline Soto
B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard
VI. Landscape Maintenance Report - CLM
VII. Old Business
VIII. Working Group Update's
A. Utilities - Charles Arthur
B. Maintenance -
C. Tax Analysis - Bud Martin
D. Liaison - Dick Lydon
IX. New Business
X. Public Comment
XI. Adjournment
The next meeting is scheduled for 2:00 PM, January 3, 2008
At ST. JOHNS PARISH LIFE CENTER Misc, Corres,
625111TH Ave.
Naples, FL.
Date:
Ilem#:
C>:J:~" to.
16/.
,
J1#
, Radio Road Beautification M.S.T.U.
Advisory Committee
z8BS Horsesh:e Drive Sou~h. '._ ~~ \f..'
Naples FL 34 4 ,lata. ,_.._..,_.."..,_..,_ .
December 18, 2007 ~,::~~ingiJii~1~:~
"oyle......1tr' R_
Coletta ., 'V' . ..
AGE DA
I. Call Meeting to Order
II. Attendance
III. Approval of Agenda
IV. Approval of Minutes: November 20, 2007
V. Transportation Services Report
A. Budget Report- Caroline Soto
B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard
VI. Landscape Maintenance Report
A. Monthly Report- Advanced Lawn
VII. Landscape Architects Report- Michael McGee
A. Monthly Report
B. Radio Road Project Phase I and Phase II-A
~--- ',----
VIII. Old Business
A. Greenway Path Public Meeting and Plans
B. Continuation of landscaping east of Santa Barbara
IX. New Business
X. Committee Member Comments
XI. Public Comments
XII. Adjournment
~~l-Bl\/FD
It"':,.
, ,': I ",_,; () r , :-~ i',
The next meeting is scheduled for January 15, 2008 4:30 p.m.
2885 Horseshoe Drive South Mise ewes:
Naples, FL 34104
Date
Item#:
.c
IX,
h" \
t,._ .
-r'
J
161
A18
November 20,2007
Prepared by:
Danyl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes
Tessie Sillery, Operations Coordinator, Collier County Department of Altemative Transportation Modes
Radio Road MSTU Proiect Status
( R- 21) - ACTIVE- (POC: Darryl Richard) - 9-19-07 - Dale Lewis moved to direct Staff to ensure
numbers are re-stenciled on each island, Second by Betty Schedule, Motion carried unanimously 4-0,
10-16-07: Staff verified - stenciling is in the contract with Bonness
Median stenciling delayed until completion of curbing project - additional 20 days was added to the
schedule on curbing project, Median Numbers will be reviewed upon completion of Bonness Curbing
Project.
( R - 14) - ACTIVE & ONGOING-Landscape Maintenance Contract (I'OC Darry Richard) - Contract
#05-3686 Part II Radio Road MSTUlMSTD Roadway Grounds Maintenance.
MSTU FUND: 158 (old 150)-l62545-634999-600811
THIS PO IS FOR MSTU FUND (150) ONLY !Notice To Proceed (P, 0, #4500048335)
MSTD FUND: 112-163652-634999-620141
THIS PO IS FOR MSTD FUND ONLY
Contract Expiration Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Notice To Proceed (P, O. #4500048336)
7-28-05: Original NTP for Contract issued (1 year initial contract; 3 renewal periods of 1 year)
2-20-07: Confirmation of repair oflrrigation Mainline on Devonshire Fund 158 (MSTU)
10-12-07: New Fiscal Year 07/08 - NTP given with PO,
10-16-07: Committee motioned for Advance must attend meetings,
11-20-07: Contract Section: Contractor's Attendance states: CONTRACTOR'S MEETING
ATTENDANCE
"During the Contract Period, the Contract Manager or an Advisory Committee if applicable, may have
questions concerning maintenance issues. The Contractor shall be required to attend monthly meetings and
other special meetings that the Contract Manager should require, There shall be no additional charge for
attendance to these meetings, If the Contractor fails to attend the monthly meetings without an excused
absence an amount equal to two (2) hours of the supervision labor rate as listed on the Bid Page shall be
deducted from the monthly billing of the Contractor against the Contract total."
11-20-07: Advanced Lawn has confirmed attendance at monthly meetings as per staff request,
(R - 13) - ACTIVE & ONGOING (Pac: Tessie Sillery) - Annual Services Contract: McGee &
Associates
9-19-06: Radio Road MSTU Committee Approved proposal from McGee in the amount of: $11,445,00 for
annual consulting services.
11-3-06: NTP was given to McGee & Associates with a Project Completion Date - September 30,
2007.
9-30-07: PO Rolled into FY07-08,
10-19-07: Committee Approved Annual Contract with McGee $ $11,950,00
11-7-07: County staff requested McGee to revise proposal.
11-20-07: Work Order bas been submitted for staff review, Approval of Work Order and PO issue pending,
(R - 12B) &(R-16) (Combined Bidding) - ACTlVE- LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION PROJECT (PaC
Danyl Richard) - Radio Road MSTU: (Phase One & Phase II-A) Landscape & Irrigation - Add
Corporate (CO Pending)
1
16/
A18
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
Radio Road MSTU: (Phase One & Phase II-A) Landscape & Irrigation
FYI:
PHASE
Start. End Date
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PHASE
10ooio Submittal
21 DAY BIDDING
BID DUE
BCC APPR
NTP Material Purchase
90 DAY (Material Purchase & Irrigation install)
CONST-COMPLETE
NTP CONST
90 DAY CONST
CONST -COMPLETE
Start - End Date
9/21/2007
10/5/2007-11/612007
11/6/2007
\2/\ 1/2007
1116/2008
1/16/08-4/14/08
4/14/2008
4/15/2008
4/\5/08-7/\5/08
7/15/2008
(Irrigation, and Plantings) - Work Order for Design to be initiated in FY-06 (October 1,2005);
Construction Cost: $810,000,00 ; Design Cost: $64,300,00 McGee & Associates
4-10-07: Re-use availability is questionable at this time, Roger Dick reports it may be wise to wait until re-
use line is run up to Radio Road as part of current Santa Barbara Project,
4-13-07: Discussion with Roger Dick and Pam Lulich indicate that Re-U se department supplements Re-
Use with Well water during 3 months of the year (typically April, May, and June), Thus water staining may
occur during these 3 months of the year to existing curbing and/or other structures over-sprayed with
irrigation water.
4-17-07: McGee recommends mixing tanks for project. Committee votes to add mixing tanks to project.
5-23-07: McGee recommends not adding Corporate Section to project at this time as it is not entirely
curbed with Type F Curbing,
7-19-07: Overall Committee consensus - not to include Corporate Section into Phase I - Landscape and
Irrigation,
7-23-07: 90% plans - still pending - no plans
8-22-07 90% plans - still pending - no plans
9-12-07 : 100% plans received for bidding - pending Purchasing
11-07-07: Bid 08-5004 -received on 11-6-07 - Hannula low bidder - Bid tabs are pending,
11-20-07: Bid Tabulation received from Purchasing Dept. Hannula is low bid for both base bid
($363,957,06) and alternates ($100,477.56)
(R- 12A) - COMPUTE- (pac Darryl Richard) - Radio Road MSTU: Phase One - Curbing
(Devonshire to Broadview Dr) (Curbing, Irrigation, and Plantings) - Work Order for Design to be
initiated in FY-06 (October 1,2005); Construction Cost: $810,000,00; Design Cost: $64,300,00 McGee &
Associates
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
2
16/
A'
.";!",,
''FYi
/'-1.1"
,
""
Radio Road MSTU: Phase One - Curbing (Devonshire to Broadview Dr)
PHASE 8mrt-EndDaw
DESIGN 9/11/06-1/29/07
14 DAY Quotes from Annual Contract 5/11/2007-5/25/2007
BID DUE 5/25/2007
BCC APPR 6/26/2007
NTP CaNST 7/17/2007
90 DAY CONST 10/15/2007
CONST-COMPLETE 10/15/2007
12-15-05-McGee sent notice to go 'on hold' for Project.
3-06-06 - McGee to revise scope of project as per Don Scott,
3-20-06 - McGee sent 'Go Ahead' on Work Order,
4-4-06-McGee submits request to modify work order in amount of$6,696,OO (submit for Committee
Approval)
5-1-06; Radio Road Curbing Plan 30% Submittal Review is pending, May 2, 2006 meeting to address
Access Management issues.
5-15-06; Access mgmt. Meeting on 5-3-06 ; as per Diane Flagg project will be phased into Phases I and
Phase 11, Dale Bathon confirming with funding from transportation and Don Scott confirming with
Transportation Administration,
5-30-06; Project is to include 3 phases, mcgee & assoc, to provide scope for phase I. - Pending
Phase 1- From (Devonshire - West to western most boundry of Berkshire Lakes Subdivision)
Phase II - From ( Western most boundary of Bershire to Livingston)
Phase III- From (Livingston to Airport)
6-12-06: McGee & Associates preparing proposal for phase I, and waiting on final billing on old work
order.
6-27-06: Need McGee proposal for phase I.
7-12-06: Need McGee proposal for phase I.
8-4-06: MSTU approved McGee Proposal for Phase I
8-22-06: Work Order for McGee Phase I is in process of SAP upload, PO number is pending, NTP is
anticipated by August 24, 2006,
8-25-06: Diane Flagg request verification that the Total Amount spent will not exceed the original Work
Order Amount of $64,300,00 (versus new proposal for: $17,330,00)
9-11-06: McGee & Associates sends correspondence in response to Staff request for confmnation of
anticipated cost for consulting for Phase I, II, and 1II combined, Copy provided for September 19, 2006
Radio Road MSTU regular meeting,
9-11-06: Notice to Proceed issued to McGee & Associates for Phase One Project; TLO-MA-36 14-06-16; p,
0, #4500066290; Total net project is $17,330,02; Work Order time-line of 140 days with Project Start Date
is September 11,2006 and Project End Date is January 29, 2007,
9-19-06: TECM Engineer Dale Bathon submits proposal for advancement of a portion of Phase II Project
into the Phase I project scope from Livingston Rd, to Kings Way, The Radio Road MSTU Committee votes
to not include this section in Phase I Project. Phase One project schedule: Design Complete January 29,
2007; Bidding Phase February 2007; BCC Approval of Award March 13,2007; NTP April 30, 2007;
Construction 120 time-line with Completion by August 30, 2007
11-21-06: McGee 100% submittal for Curbing Phase I has been rejected by TECM Engineers - TECM
recommends Sub-Consultant Engineer for Curbing Plans, TECM requires Signed & Sealed Plans by State
Licensed Engineer prior to approval.
1-16-07 Proposal from McGee for Sub Consultant - to be reviewed by Committee
1-17-07 Committee approved McGee for Sub Consultant - $ 2,510,00
1-29-07: Called and left message for Consultant to revise spreadsheet on costs,
2-13-07: McGee revised spreadsheet included in proposed Change Order #1.
2-20-07: Change Order #1 is being reviewed by Staff for approval. Inclusion of Engineer Sub-consultant is
only item in Change Order.
3-8-07: NTP for Change Order # I.
3
161
A18
3-20-07: Formal Request sent to McGee for confmnation of delivery of 100% Drawings prior to 3-30-07
4-16-07: Coordination meeting for Public Meeting to be held May I" from 5 to 7 PM. 100% plans (revised)
pending from McGee,
5-2-07: TECM revisions as per PIM Meeting forwarded to McGee, Revision due by 5110107,
6-19-07: Novus item - 16B - BCC meeting of 6-26-07 - Bonness, Inc, $ 433,885.43
7-10-07: Bcc approved, - PO request submitted on - 6-27-07 with Signed Work Order,
7-10-07: Pending release from purchasing for PO,
7-17-07: NTP given to Bonness
7-18-07: Discussed overall project with Bonnes & set up weekly meetings - begiruting August 3,d
8-22-07: Root pruning to magnolia trees - ETI - trees to be moved upon receipt of PO -
pending BA,
9-10-07: Budget Amendment processed by Gloria and we received PO for ETI on 9-4-07.
9-18-07: Change Order # 1 pending
10-22-07: Change Order Processed and notification went out to McGee & Assoc.
11-07 -07: Change Order # 1 pending.
(R-20) -COMPLETE - (p.Oe. Darryl) - Root Pruning & Removal and relocation of Trees on
Radio Road
8-22-07: Notice to Proceed - ETI- $1,750 for root pruning and within 3 weeks (after BA) is
approved the PO will be increased with the difference. ($8,530.00 is the total amount of estimate)
9-10-07: Week of 9-24"' to 28"' - anticipation of moving trees, - pending locates
9-24-07: Darryl met in field with En and to be completed by 9-26-07,
9-26-07: Project Completed
(R-20) -COMPLETE - (poe Darryl) - Root Pruning & Removal and relocation of Trees on
Radio Road
8-22-07: Notice to Proceed - ETI - $1,750 for root prunmg and within 3 weeks (after BA) is
approved the PO will be increased with the difference, ($8,530,00 is the total amount of estimate)
9-10-07: Week of 9_24"' to 28"' - anticipation of moving trees, - pending locates
9-24-07: Darryl met in field with En and to be completed by 9-26-07,
9-26-07: Project Completed
(R - 17) - COMPLETE - TECM-Radio Road - (Phase II-A) Curbing - Brairwood to Commercial &
Corporate (IN FORMA nON ONLY)
R-19) - COMPLETE (P,(),C. Darryl) Corporate Square Pavers (P. O. #4500082550: dated 816(2007);
Work Order: BC-FT -3773-0710- (60 day Work Order) completion date October 6, 2007
7-23-07- Requested for Quote from Bonness for project
8-7-07: Notice to Proceed
9-10-07: To be completed by 9-11-07
9-11-07 : Project Complete
(R - 15) - COMPLETE, RE-USE WATER PROJECT PERMI f'TING PHASE (POC: Darryl Richard)
3-08-07: Updated application for Re-Use Gallons per minute and approval pending
4-10-07: Re-use availability is questionable at this time, Roger Dick reports it may be wise to wait until re-
use line is run up to Radio Road as part of current Santa Barbara Project.
4-13-07: Discussion with Roger Dick and Pam Lulich indicate that Re-Use department supplements Re-
Use with Well water during 3 months of the year (typically April, May, and June), Thus water staining may
occur during Ihese 3 months of the year to existing curbing and/or other structures over-sprayed with
irrigation water.
4-17-07: McGee recommends mixing tanks for project, Committee votes to add mixing tanks to project,
4
16/
A18
4-27-07: Utilities confirms that RE-USE Application has been approved and will forward hardcopy,
5-7-07: Re-Use Application is approved. Hardcopy scanned and forwarded to Mike McGee,
( R - 19) - COMPLETE- Painting of Radio Road Median Tips with Numbers - The median tips (bull-
nose) are to be painted yellow in accordance with FDOT standards with median numbers,
10-17-06: Committee approves not to exceed $2,500,00 for project. Directs staff to utilize annual
contractor. Trutwin annual is active for painting within ROW,
10-23-06: Direction to utilize 'in house' Road & Bridge Department funds and resources for project, Given
that the medians are 'County Property',
11-20-06: John Vliet, Road & Bridge rejected plans to paint curb #'s on Radio Road,
11-20-06: Staff requested quote for Trutwin to paint curb #'s on Devonshire,
1-3-07: PO & NTP to Trutwin
1-29-07: Project Complete
(R-Il) COMPLETE - SDP PLAN REQUEST; SOP 3425 Radio Road - Plan review by Committee for
Landscape Plans submitted for development,
11-21-06: This SDP Plan does not affect MSTU/MSTD plantings or irrigations,
( R - 15) - COMPLETE - Pavers for FoxfIre Medians
9-19-06: Radio Road MSTU votes to install pavers at the median tips (bull-nose) for the West Median and
East Median at FoxfIre,
9-19-06: Staff request Quote from Bonness for the paver installation,
10-10-06: Staff receives quote from Bonness in the amount of$9,257,70, Request to Purchase submitted.
11-6-06: Begin Construction of project by Bonness, Inc, pavers to match existing specification,
11-10-06: Project Completed
( R - 18) - COMPLETE - Radio Road Median Irrigation Conversion - Allamanda and Plumago Planting
Beds to be converted from drip line system to irrigation spray heads on risers,
10-17-06: Committee approves of conversion based on 112 funding no motion necessary, Mike McGee
advises Committee and Staff that conversion is necessary to ensure plant health,
10-30-06: Median irrigation conversion is progressing, irrigation mainline break is repaired during project.
11-6-06: Project Complete; Inspection for Punch-List to follow Nov, 6 to 9 for proper operation,
(R-IO) COMPLETE - SDP 7405 Devonshire Blvd-- Plan review by Committee for Landscape Plans
submitted for development.
9-25-06: Plans reviewed with ROW, Contractor has removed shrubs on County ROWand will be required
to replace shrubs and damaged irrigation system,
10-17-06: Copy of Plans provided for Committee review, Landscaping found to be satisfactory,
( R - 17) - COMPLETE - Committee Chairman request for information regarding 'loan' to MSTU
9-19-06: Radio Road MSTU Committee Chairman request staff provide a report on options available to the
MSTU in so far as a 'loan' or advancement of funds, (1) What is the maximum amount? (2) Is there any
interest? (3) What is the amount of time allowed for repayment?
10-17-06: Staff provides answer as per discussion with Budget: (I) Maximum amount is determined by
'Project Need' which would be after all cost considerations are identified. Review and approval by County
Manager's OffIce/ County Attorney's Office Required; (2) Interest on loan would be negotiated through
County Manager's Office and County Attorney; (3) Amount of time for repayment would be negotiated
through County Manager's Office and County Attorney; Note: The advancement of funds requires Board
of County Commissioner's approval.
(R - 14)- COMPLETE -Request from TECM Engineer Dale Bathon - Phase 11 Project item
9-19-06: Dale Bathon submits plans for a section of Phase 11 project (Livingston Rd, to Kings Way) for
inclusion into Phase I project.
9-19-06: Radio Road MSTU Committee votes not to include Phase 11 item into Phase 1 project.
(R-9) CANCEI.LED -Well Water Mitigation (Chemical Treatment of Well Water)- Cancelled-
5
..".._,~,..~
161
A 18
-,v.lll!'
September 12,2005: 8/l6/05 committee cancelled project. Cost was determined to be excessive for annual
maintenance of filtration system,
(R - 8) - COMPLETE -Milage Rate ( ,25 vs .50) - Dale Lewis requested for the history at the Budget
(Carry Forward vs Audit - follow up meeting) with all the MSTU Chairman - 7-17-06
8-22-06: Sharon Newman's report is pending,
8-25-06: Norman Feder, Transportation Administrator accepts responsibility for the adjustment of the
Millage Rate from ,50 to ,25 (during FY-04 to FY-05), The Radio Road MSTU Committee may vote to
increase Millage back to ,50 for the FY-08 Budget Request, Currently the Radio Road Project Funds are
sufficient for current project demands,
(R -7) - COMPLETE - Devonshire Maintenance (Fund 150)-Advanced Lawn Estimate 06-191; On
August 4, 2006, By Committee Action, Committee approved $17,290,00 for items included in Advanced
Lawn estimate for Devonshire Maintenance (Fund 150), Scope of project is stump grinding, Viburnum
replacement and incidental irrigation repairs (included in quote, as per Frank Kip, owner)
8-24-06; Advanced Lawn Crews begin stump Grinding
8-25-06; Mike Luneke, Advanced Lawn confIrms that stump grinding is at 100% completion, Staff to
inspect. Advanced Lawn will fInish planting of Viburnum by 8-26-06,
8-31-06: Project is complete
(R - 6) - COMPLETE - Radio Road Maintenance (Fund 112) -Advanced Lawn Estimate 06-184, 06-185,
and 06-186; On August 4, 2006, Committee reviewed items included in Advanced Lawn estimate for Radio
Road Maintenance (Fund 112), Scope of project is replacement of Juniper Plants, installation of mulch
material, and installation of irrigation components,
8-25-06; Mike Luneke, Advanced Lawn confIrms that project is at 100% completion, Staff to inspect,
(R-5) COMPLETE - PROJECT TRANSFERRED TO CAT FUNDING-CAT Bus Shelter
(R-4) -COMPLETE- Sod Refurbishment at median I Radio Road at Santa Barbara -COMPLETE -
Advanced Lawn,
(R-3) -COMPLETE-Pump Repair -Radio Road- COMPLETE; Repair By County
(R-2) -COMPLETE-Annual Maintenance Contract Bidding-
July 28, 2005: NTP Contract 05-3686 Part ll, issued to Advanced Lawn Maintenance - Completed
(R-l) COMPLETE -ARBORIST SERVICES CONTRACT; Committee requested McGee to provide quote
for arborist services, McGee Scope for Arborist Services cannot be approved as per LA 04-3614,
Landscape Architectural Services Fixed, Terms and Conditions, Additional Quotes requested as per
Committee Direction.
4-17-06; Davey Tree Company is low quote at $15,350,00 for both consultation and maintenance,(submit
for Committee Action)
5-1-06; Documentation for Request to Purchase submitted, PO is pending,
5-15-06: Project complete with Field Inspection pending
5-30-06 Inspection complete - contractor to perform additional final pruning late fall.
6-27-06: Final pruning in fall to be done
6
o~fi::il~~
-4UJUJ)ooo
)ommzQQ
....;:o;oUJmm
m<<"-4-4
)(mmm-4-i
~UJo~~~
Z ;oOzz
UJ nZOOOO
III OUJ-i)>
z-4n"
-4 n"
Z 0;0
Q .-
m
161-'
-. .... \I ;;:: V V .. V' u ~ ~ ~ w Z ... v ~ Z ... 0 - ."" , ~1 B
~~~";o~1~1m)>~zo~~~~~1z0Q~~m~~~~~~~;o
ZZ~ ;om-.m -4 n-4Z;o"m ;o",~z;o;ozzmoo)>
C/)oo)oO)o;o~;o'--OO~m^)>~;O~~m""*~~~~~Z-40
~-4""~~om;;::~~~ Z'-~Q8~-im~m~oo~~ffi~~
~~g~~~~~~)>~ ~~m~~m80~-4C/)~~""~~5
~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~)>)>~~~z;o
~~OO~~~>ooO-i >~Zm g-o;o;om<o;oo;oo;;::;;::g-im~
Q~Z zz;Om zm -. m Z -i)>-' ~
Z mC/)Q mQ~~ o;;::~ cm- -iOQ)>"C;o-i
n ZmOO 0 z)> 00;;::.- )>~~ ~."m)(,,~rn~
o C C 0'- n)> .-)>c mmZn;o-i
;0 "00 (0)>- 00.- 2 0
"'U "'0 m ()r-
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*~~~~~~~~~
- ~ - - ~ m~
t N N - ... ~ N 0; (;) (;)
~ N N a> 'J. a> ~ ~ ~ a> .... '" ~ ~ a> <Xl '" ~N C CD
CD !D .CD .a !>> N N N ~ ~ ~ 1" <0 ~o _0 ~ .a ~ '" ..... CD a> N ~ a> .!'J.9!'J 0.=
Go ~ ~ ..... ~ m ~ '" ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ '0 00 0 .... 0 '0 m '" mOl CnID :.., <Xl 0 <Xl CD 0.
UI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <0 <0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UI 0 CD <0 0 000 _CD
CD 0 0 !=' 0 0 !=' 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 !=' 0 !=' !=' 0 0 0 0 !=' ~ CD 0 ~ ~ !=' 000 0.
:... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~a ~ ~ 0 000
... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a> a> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1>0 .9 a> .9 90.8
... ... ... ... ...... ... ... ... iflt.9t.9t.9t.9i:Ai>9-MtR-EflfIJ.UJifl.UJtIt ... ... ~ tR t.9 t.9.UJ .........
W N
- a> N ~
'" '" ~ N !>> .... N '" ~
:.., ... 0,0 .... ~ ..... m :'::'0 .....
- CD o ~ ~ 0 <Xl CD "'<0 CD
<I> '" 9~ 0 !=' ~ !=' <ON '"
r ~ 00 m 0 :,.. CD 0:"" '"
a> 0'" '" 0 0 ..... o ~ 0
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... t.9t.9-(flt.9tfliflt.9f1J-fh-tfltflifltfltfl-(fl ...... tR -ffl tfl i:A iR .........
o
o
3
3
;:;:
3
CD
=
It
- ~ (;) ~
.... w '" .N .a> ....
b a> a> W N '" '" '" CD '" ..... '" '" ..... -:::;
.... '" N '" CD <Xl <Xl ~ 0 a> 0 - '" '" <Xl ..... .....
0 a> N '" .... !=' ~ <Xl ~ ..... ~ ..... ..., CD N a> '" '"
g, N :,.. ..... N <0 '" a> 0 :,.. 0 <Xl Co N <0 ..... .....
(II ..... <0 <Xl <Xl '" ~ 0 '" a> 0 <0 UI ~ ~~ .9 .9
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ifltfltfl-6't-tRifltfl-ffltfl-tfltRiflifliflt.9 ... ... -Efl tfl tfl -{I} {R .........
m
..
CD )0
an
_. c
-..
c-
iil
OJ
- ~ ~
:.. 0 '0
w ~ N N 0 0 <0
CD <0 CD 0 <Xl ~ .N 1" ~ ~ ....
:.. '" '" ~ '0 <0 '" '" ~ ~ -<0 '" N (j;
W 0 0 ..... a> 0 0 0 0 <0 0 0 0
CD 0 0 ~ :--' a> 00 0 0 '" 0 !=' 0
:.." 0 0 ..... ~ N 00 0 0 0 0 0 0
..... 0 0 '" ~ N 0 0 0 0 .... 0 0 .9
"2 s: "
a III III "
","2. = .-
a '" ,. &l
c '"
0 =>
0
'" !,!,
-<
2
~
'"
- ~ )>
... N 0; (;) (;) -i<
~ ~~ "'- '" '" ~ .... a> <Xl '" ~N o !!.
_<0 0 .... 9' ~ '" 9' ....a> J>> ~(J"I a> '" _N ~o_'" - -
'0 '0 '0 m wm :.., w .. ..
0 .... 0 ..... CD <0 '" 000 -IT
0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 ~ CIlO '" <0 0 ~ <Xl NON CD
!=' !=' !=' 0 N 0 !=' !=' N "'0 ~~ !=' N a> a>oa>
0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 '" NO <0 ~ 0 N <0 wow
0 0 .9 0 0 .9 0 0 .....0 -:::! a> .9 '" a> 809
" ." n III ~
a 0' '" a
iil ~ ~ => < <
'" a: => III CD
- III ",- '" => =
-< =;- n '" 0
'" '" 0.
::::0 :::t 0 0. CD
...
"'CO '0 '-z
",Ill'<
o!:!:m III ..
C a .. ~ 3
n::J"C CD
'" iil
C/J Y.!
.".-
~Jg
==1>>
N :;
!!i 0.
oom
c l'l iD
!!~
OJ fi:
-- ;::]..:<
!!.
~~4'
o~ a
:T ... 5'
o'rc
=>
o
..,
CD
if::J
3 :u
o
ill
;0'-
a III
III =>
0.0.
:e ~
III III
'<1jl
... ...
a> ....
~m
<Xl <0
~ 0
~(o
0.....
<Mifl-tRt.9iflifltfl-fflt.9-tfltflifl>
n
-
c
!!.
~
..
a:
-
w '" CD
W N '" '" ...
~ <Xl <Xl ~ ~ 0 a>
<0 !=' ..... <Xl <0 <Xl
N W CD :,.. m 0 Co
CD ~ '" a> 0 '" CD
~ S
< t
CD "TI C
rrC:~
CD z C
.. c)
.., ... t
001
~ CD i
o (j
o -
...... C
, .,~ J,...
cc.
'L
h luua
Radio Road Beautification M.S.T.U.
16/
'''d' , c), A'ini'101ig",oners
November 20, 2007
Advisory Committee
2885 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples FL 34104 Fiala ..__....__...,..
Halas... ...._..._
Henning...._ .__..._... _, ,
Coyle
Cnletta
.~
Minutes
../
I. The meeting was called to order by Dale Lewis at 4:25 PM.
II. ATTENDANCE
Members: Dale Lewis, Betty Schudel, Bill Jaeger, Helen Carella
(Excused)
County: Darryl Richard - Project Manager, Tessie Sillery - Operations
Coordinator, Caroline Soto - Budget Analyst
Others: Mike McGee - McGee & Assoc., Dan Mote - Advanced Lawn,
Darlene Lafferty- Mancan
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Betty Schudel moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Dale Lewis.
Motion carried unanimously 3-0.
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 16,2007
Betty Schudel moved to approve the October 16, 2007 Minutes as
submitted. Second by Bill Jaeger. Motion carried unanimously 3-0.
V. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT:
A. Budget Report - Caroline Soto distributed and reviewed (See
attached)
· Operating Expense $161605.00
· Improvernents General Available $1,001,100,00
B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard distributed and reviewed
(See attached).
· (R-21) Median numbers were re-painted
· Contractor Meeting Attendance - It was stated Attendance was a
Contractual requirement. Noted Advanced Lawn was in attendance
today & would continue to do so for all future rneetings
· McGee & Associates FY08 proposal in the amount of$II,950.00 is
in the approval process
· (R-2B & (R-16) Landscape & Irrigation Project reviewed l}i.~ 0~-5004
(See attached) recommended awarding Base Bid $363,957.1Jl!i'& orres
Alternate Bid $100,477.56 to Hannula Landscaping. Dale:
Item#:
:'.~J,?<; to'
161
A 18
Dale Lewis questioned Phase I - page 3 MSTU/CoIlier County section
that did not include pricing. Noted if the Bid was approved today the
"By County" cost was not included in the $363,957.06 Base Bid.
Darryl Richard responded that additional "By County" cost
information was needed.
Discussions ensued & it was recommended to approve expenditures
that were listed.
Dale Lewis moved to accept $464,434.62 Bid 08-5004 from Hannula
Landscaping. Second by Bill Jaeger. Motion carried unanimously
3-0.
Darryl Richard stated he would coordinate with McGee & Associates
to address the "By County" items. Additional contractor quotes would
be required
Dale Lewis requested the "By County" Bids for the December IS,
2007.
VI. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT:
Monthly Report - Advanced Lawn Dan Mote reported:
. Devonshire Insecticide treatment 11-13-07
. Radio Road Insecticide treatment 11-14-07
. Devonshire has been mulched
. Wilting beds on Devonshire - will conduct 10 minute checks &
manually water the beds until the problem is resolved
Mike McGee stated the problem was an inadequate water supply. Roger
Dick was checking 2 zones to obtain an accurate count on gallonage. A
schedule would then be re-created based on the number of valves that
were required & determine the number of valves that were disconnected
during Phase I.
VII. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECH REPORT: Mike McGee
A. Monthly Report - reported an accident in the middle of a Plumbago
bed that damaged 2 Buttonwoods.
It was recommended to remove the existing Plumbago and not replant.
The following 2 options were recommended:
1. Remove existing damaged plants and apply mulch
2. Plant Crown of Thoms a very draught tolerant plant
Dale Lewis requested an estimate to plant Crown of Thoms be
submitted at the December IS, 2007.
Darryl Richard announced the possibility of an increase in watering
restrictions to I day per week.
Mike McGee recommended the removal of 3 old Hibiscus trees at
rnedian #3 on Devonshire & replace with mulch.
2
161
AIR
Darryl Richard recommended revisiting at a later date to determine
type of replacement plant once the watering restriction is finalized and
the Project is completed & reuse is connected.
Dale Lewis moved to remove (3 Hibiscus trees) & wait until the
project is completed in regards to the water application& revisit the
project after that Second by Bill Jaeger. Motion carried
unanimously 3-0.
B. Radio Road Curbing - None
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. Greenway Path Public Meeting and Plans - Darryl Richard stated
the report will be available at the December 18, 2007 meeting.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. Continuation of landscaping east of Santa Barbara - Darryl
Richard - None
Mike McGee reported for Phase I received a Contractor quote for Hydro
seed in the amount of$5000 for median interior along Devonshire to Blue
Sky.
Dale Lewis requested delaying the application of the Hydro seed due to
ongoing projects.
Darryl Richard stated he would contact Road & Bridge for approval to
install a strip of sod along the curbing & fill the interior with dirt
temporarily.
X. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS - None
XI. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None
There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was
adjourned at 5:30 PM.
3
Radio Road Beauti!~o! MSTU A 18
Advisory Committee
/;)&t ~~~
Dale Lewis, Chairman
These minutes approved by the Committee on
as presented or amended
The next meeting will be held at 4:30 PM, January 15, 2008
Collier County Transportation BuildinglEast Conference Room
2885 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, FL 34104
4
161
A
18
" "
",
Radio Road Beautification M.S.T.U.
Advisory Committee
2705 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples FL 34104
SUMMARY OF MINUTES & MOTIONS
November 20 2007
III. & IV. Agenda & Minutes of October 16,2007 were approved unanimously.
V. Transportation Services Report
B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard
. Landscape & Irrigation Project reviewed Bid 08-5004 (See attached)
recommended awarding Base Bid $363,957.06 & Alternate Bid
$100,477.56 to Hannula Landscaping.
Dale Lewis questioned Phase I - page 3 MSTU/Collier County section
that did not include pricing. Noted if the Bid was approved today the
"By County" cost was not included in the $363,957.06 Base Bid.
Dale Lewis moved to accept $464,434.62 Bid 08-5004 from Hannula
Landscaping. Second by Bill Jaeger. Motion carried unanimously
3-0.
VII. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECH REPORT: Mike McGee
A. Monthly Report -recomrnended the removal of 3 old Hibiscus trees at
median #3 on Devonshire & replace with mulch.
Dale Lewis moved to remove (3 Hibiscus trees) & wait until the project is
completed in regards to the water application& revisit the project after
that Second by Bill Jaeger. Motion carried unanimously 3-0.
161
,; Radio Road Beautification M.S.T.U.
Advisory Committee
z885 Horseshoe Drive South . ~ ~! \f'
Naples FL J4l04 Fiata, C_~.,' -
~,'_,-j,., eo~~~nq:~~,' "'~.'.vA ','
January 15, 2008 '~ ' y,eJtbp"'"
,_,olett? G!../
AGENDA
I. Call Meeting to Order
II. Attendance
III. Approval of Agenda
IV. Approval of Minutes: December 18,2007
V. Transportation Services Report
A. Budget Report- Caroline Soto
B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard
VI. Landscape Maintenance Report
A. Monthly Report- Advanced Lawn
VII. Landscape Architects Report- Michael McGee
A. Monthly Report
B, Radio Road Project Phase I and Phase II-A
VIII. Old Business
A. Greenway Path Public Meeting and Plans
B, Continuation of landscaping east of Santa Barbara
IX, New Business
X. Committee Member Comments
XI. Public Comments
XII. Adjournment
A 18
"
~
,,~..,,:,,~
lit 12
The next meeting Is scheduled for February 19, 200~if?3tPj9:m.l (;
2885 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, FL 34104
Date:
Item #:__--
16/
A18
.....:.i
,~
, ,
"
,
Radio Road Beautification M.S.T.U.
Advisory Committee .
2885 Horseshoe Drive SouthFlala -----.-.---
Naples FL 34104 Hala~ --:?"i'\r----'---
Henl1lng.:l..D----..-- .,
December 18, 2007 g~f~~4=::& ...
o
Minutes
I. The meeting was called to order by Dale Lewis at 4:32 PM.
II. ATTENDANCE
Members: Dale Lewis, Betty Schudel, Bill Jaeger, Helen Carella
County: Darryl Richard - Project Manager, Tessie SilIery - Operations
Coordinator, Caroline Soto - Budget Analyst, Roger Dick -- Irrigation
Project Manager, Pam Lulich - Landscape Operations Manger
Others: Mike McGee - McGee & Assoc., Dan Mote -- Advanced Lawn,
Darlene Lafferty- Mancan
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Add: V. B. 1. Roger Dick
2, Pam Lulich
Betty Schudel moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Second by
Dale Lewis. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 20, 2007
Change: V. A, to read Operating Expense "$161,605.00 "
Betty Schudel moved to approve the November 20, 2007 Minutes as
amended. Second by Dale Lewis. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
V. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT:
A. Budget Report - Caroline Soto distributed and reviewed (See
attached)
. Irnprovements General Budget $1,264,593.16
. Remaining P.O. Balance $37,191.11 for Bonness
B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard distributed and reviewed
(See attached).
. (R-15) Quote for "By County" Items Bid 08-5004 - The Board of
County Commissioners approved the Bid A ward to Hannula in the
amoWlt of $464,434.62 on December 11,2007. The Contract is
currently Wlder review.
The question was raised if the Project would be restricted due to Misas6m'es
Date
1
l~em #:______
- ~'J(.:.1 tc
161
A18
~
Darryl Ricbard stated the Project would not be delayed based on the
following timeline:
I. The 1 st Notice to Proceed would be issued after receiving approval
from Purchasing, Risk Management, & the County Attorneys
a. Irrigation installation & material purchasing would occur
within the first 90 days
b. Lane closures would not be required during the 90 day period
2. "On or About" April 15, 2008 a Notice to Proceed will be issued
for Landscaping installation to occur within a 90 day period
. (R-12B) & (R-16) (Combined Bidding) Radio Road MSTU (Phase I &
Phase II-A) Landscape & Irrigation
Darryl Ricbard foresees the issuance of the Notice to Proceed by
January 16, 2008. He will monitor closely to remain on schedule.
The Quote for "By County" Items Bid was distributed. (See Attached)
Pam Lulicb announced US41 N was recently landscaped. A ROW Permit
application for US41 N (Phase 5) Two Lakes Development has been
subrnitted. She has requested Mike McGee review the MSTU Radio Rd
Project to integrate the Landscaping materials that will be relocated. She
stated the relocation of materials would be at developer cost noting Radio
Rd. is maintained under the 112 Fund & would reduce MSTU Contract
Cost significantly.
Mike McGee reviewed the "By County" Phase I & Phase IIA MSTU item
cost for the Reuse Conversion totaling $88,600.
Darryl Ricbard distributed AG-TRONIX quote #832 & #833 in the
amount of $22,600. (See Attached)
Mike McGee noted the quotes would upgrade the system to County
Standards for the Reuse Systern.
Discussions ensued & was agreed to wait for cost quotes from Annual
Electrical Contractors.
Dale Lewis moved to accept $22,600 "Not to Exceed" for components
from A G- TRONIX. Second by Betty SchudeL Motion carried
unanimously 4-0.
VI. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT:
A. Montbly Report - Advanced Lawn Dan Mote reported:
. Cleared Palmetto's on Radio Rd. & Devonshire
. Replaced damaged Silver Button Wood Trees & Plumbago from an
accident (across from Taylor Rental) with Crown of Thorn
Dale Lewis inquired about the accident report.
Tessie Sillery responded none received to date
. Rernoved 3 Hibiscus Trees on Devonshire median
2
161 -~
. December 5, 2007 Treated Plumbago. Will continue treatments A 1 8 ""
Bi-weekly
. Problem areas of Alarnanda were lacking irrigation. Advanced Lawn
will heavily water to revive
Darryl Richard reported a notification from Code Enforcement on a
hedge (behind Publix) affecting visibility. Stated the ROW Handbook
requires a height of30 inches. Noted Advanced Lawn would trirn to the
required height.
A Stump in Devonshire median was reported.
Discussions ensued concerning the renumbering of the medians. It was
stated $1,200 was previously paid for median numbering. Noting TECM
installed turn lanes & destroyed the numbering.
Discussions continued & it was determined the numbering process was not
complete. An assessment was needed to determine the number of medians
that required renumbering. After the evaluation TECM would be
contacted for reimbursement.
Dale Lewis moved to know by next meeting a quote on MSTU, TECM &
County (MSTD) cost (for the numbering of the medians). Second by
Helen Carella. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
A large hole in a Palm base located in the median on Devonshire was
reported.
VII. LANDSCAPE ARCBITECH REPORT: Mike McGee
A. Monthly Report - Identified the following problem areas:
:>> Median #9 recommended adding Crown of Thorns
:>> Median #12 Juniper on the median East end is sparse. Will fill in
the tip with Crown of Thorn
:>> Median # 17 Dry Alarnanda will be replaced if it does not rebound.
Plumbago also trending downward.
:>> Median # 19 Section of Plumbago will require a 50% trade out
Discussions ensued & plant replacernent cost was questioned
Dan Mote estimated 90 replacement plants would be required.
Dale Lewis moved to authorize Mike McGee & Advance Lawn to fIX
these areas (Median) not to exceed $3,000. Second by Bill Jaeger.
Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
B. Radio Road Project Phase I and Phase II - Previously discussed V.B.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. Greenway Path Public Meeting and Plans - No funding Available
frorn TECM.
B. Continuation of landscaping east of Santa Barbara - Per Pam
Lulich no information available at this time
3
16/
IX. NEW BUSINESS - None
X. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS - None
XI. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None
There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was
adjourned at 5:30 PM.
Radio Road Beautification MSTU
Advisory Committee
~~/~
Dale Lewis, Chairman
These minutes "roved by the Committee on
as presented I or amended .
1- IS -O~
The next meeting will be held at 4:30 PM, February 19, 2008
Collier County Transportation Building/East Conference Room
2885 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, FL 34104
4
A
IP
~
261
AIQ
Radio Road Beautification M.S.T.U.
Advisory Committee
2705 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples FL 34104
SUMMARY OF MINUTES & MOTIONS
December 18 2007
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Add: VB. 1. Roger Dick
2, Pam Lulich
Betty Schudel moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Second by
Dale Lewis. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
11. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 20, 2007
Change: V A. to read Operating Expense "$161, 605,00"
Betty Schudel moved to approve the November 20, 2007 Minutes as
amended. Second by Dale Lewis. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
111. & IV. Agenda & Minutes of November 20, 2007 were approved
unanimously.
V. Transportation Services Report
B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard
Darryl Richard distributed AG- TRONIX quote #832 & #833 in the
amount of $22,600. (See Attached)
Dale Lewis moved to accept $22,600 "Not to Exceed" for components
from A G _ TRONIX Second by Betty Schudel. Motion carried
unanimously 4-0.
It was stated $1,200 was previously paid for median numbering. Noting
TECM installed turn lanes & destroyed the numbering.
An assessment was needed to determine the number of medians that
required renumbering. After the evaluation TECM would be contacted for
reimbursement.
Dale Lewis moved to know by next meeting a quote on MSTU, TECM &
County (MSTD) cost (for the numbering of the medians). Second by
Helen Carella. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
16/
AlP
Mike McGee reported on Median Landscaping problem areas.
Dan Mote estimated 90 replacement plants would be required.
Dale Lewis moved to authorize Mike McGee & Advance Lawn to fIX
these areas (Median) not to exceed $3,000. Second by Bill Jaeger.
Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
-I
::u
,
"lJ
,
'"
f>-
z"'O-
o ~ '"
(icrg
.. :. Dr
"lJ 0 -
.2, "2. ~
CO '" '"
Sl~m
~" '"
o CO :E
g5';:+:
CO =r
:E CO ~
CO ~ 0
CD Q) 0
Q.c.~
_<D~
CD '0 CD
CDCD...::'.-
Q. ~
c:"O
::!. iir
" "
CO _'"
8 "
" Sco
!!1.
~ '"
c:
Sl ~
o' 0..
" G)
'" -
" ~
Q."O
'" a
;~
5 co
'" Q.
-co
8 Dr
3 ""
"0
iD
~
6'
2-
t61
....lo. Wf\.)......
enlll
->
-I en
r>!=T ~ ~ m
~()",en::Ulll
oc'l:J"Om-
E)r-+"2.W-CC
~"'o',<)>en
g5.g.~,~;il
~ ~ :s ~:::t c
= ~ '" " Om
:Eco3~Zi:
s: co3 ~CT ~ 90 f2
5' Q. co '" G) iii
3 iii' CD CD ~-I
~::S..o m 06
-'"oc: -z
'" co -':E Z
:s ~ CD _. ,......
tn "0 a. g. UI "'D
O'mQ'o ::a
q~~_.a ~
~amn ~
gm5.~ :::!
....l. D:I 0 a- 0
~ a;7l::' o' Z
oQococoC: >
=R co Z
o-(j)"OS' 0
'" -"0
~ ~ ~ 0
*" "0 .2.:: -
o a (tl 0 (J)
-:::!l51~ ."
(')-~o' 0
c<D<" en
a-Oom == )>
_. CD C. . r-
~6i -i
co:=~~
CD 0
o
~
3
o
CD
~
:n
...
-""
'"
""
'"
en",
c:
CT
J.
~~
o
'" '"
......
"" ""
ww
""""
"''''
00
00
)>S:"lJ1lI
en)>)>>
I--<en
~~s:m
;=mmlll
-IZZ-
_)>-10
::UzQoG) 0
m ()"lJ m CD
()mmz '"
oo::u m n
~"b$! t
"lJ-I::u1"" 0'
>~S:"'ll "
Z"T1)>::U
en"T1z0
-()<..
()mm
roO
o~
Z-I
o!l;!
en
"lJ"lJ"lJ
a ~ ~
<
c:0()
CD g g
go ffi" !:t
~ '"
3()g.
21, 0 0
a50
~-<g
"OQo3
co "T1 co
"'oa
8 0 '"
" -I
~"'C
(') 0
~.Q
o
(')
c:
3
co
"
~
'"
r-r-r-
~en~
~ ~ ~
cn~{;,9*
C
O"-"'Oll\,)
,!..u,c.nc"
0000
S'!"!"!"
-000
000
.u.~~.y,
~
O....l.O>I\J
c.nc.no,c.n
0000
0000
0000
0000
:-
18
l/l
-<
;C
~;'
-I ~
m
::ue
:;!!
I""N
UJ~
lID""
~
::u
'"
1lI
is
en
o
:J:
m
o
c:
I""
m
en
N'
CD
Qo
en
"
CD
n
::;;
;;'
..
..
0'
"
c:
"
;:;:
~
c:
:,
..
o
o
..
~
-I
~
f
~88
01""1""
al:l:
;:amm
O;:a;:a
>00
000
,.,c:c:
..zz
in::;!::;!
:-I"'lllll
c:;:a-
. 00
"'ll<..z
~~!'
U> -II
~z
-!'
>
i:
m
o
5>
z
I""
>
Z
o
en
o
>
"'ll
m
lID
;ij
;:a
15
>
-I
a
z
::u
m
z
o
;;
-I
a
z
"'ll
::u
o
<..
m
o
-I
,,-
><
-IOS
O(l)Z
~8G)
g@ sa
~ -I
<ii m
';8 ~
< -I
!!i m
U> ;:0
;;
r-
III
-10
00
'O:J
U> 0
0'
=00
aJOJ
OJ :J
00.
9;00
=(1)
~
-I
;:0
,
"tl
,
w
"tl"tl
(I) (I)
~ ~
"tl"tl
War
:J :J
U> U>
IlOIlO
CJloo
'0 '0
(I) (I)
00
IT IT
~ ~
c5" O'
:J :J
U> U>
000
<<
N~
00
00
Ill......
c
o::r
~_' ~ ~
00
00
... ... ...
N N
<O-.JN
'00'0
000
000
000
000
"tl
OJ
<
(I)
~
U>
~
o
~
o
o
Ill...
c
o::r
~
;'!::l
-W
....
......
01
ow
~-....
N~
:"-0
00
~ ~ 16~ ~A~.
r-om~ooaJaJ"tl"tl"tlIoo>~S::OG)~om
~ COOOOOOO>aJ OO~~::Or-O<1Il
I Z >< III m
m~OaJaJ"tl"tl"tlI-> ~::o-l-lO "
ccOOO~mE~~~ Oo~mro J
-o2.0cScSffS3=t 3 o.~Cin)llo
g~<mmQ.-.O"(6C5 '<-zo-c Z
~~cm--(I)~OJ-3OJ ao~cU> -I
-OJO:", :::a ~ ~ ::I - (C Q) a. or 2. Dr <
~~5~~c3og~m O"m~o~' ~
3g. mmo )>o.::!'f/'J -.CDr-=rCC )>
-, -. OJ OJ :J U> C 0 OJ 0 2' iil ,..,:r -I
~~ f/'Jf/'Jcnm::!.w~=r a~~~ffi' m
::I "O"Omwgmg& OJ ~O::l :::a
(Jl "'!='"'!='a=oQj '^=: Ii S:ID;;:
00' - - c: CD - CD 0 r-
-,j ~ar3~OJ U> ~ III
Q) SCD 0
(iJ c::J ~
o CD c.... m
~.: g g. ~
. :J
U>
o
:J_
1Il
o
-10
cO
=l.z
ooG)~
$' c
:J -
o 0
Iii ::T
'0
::T
~
c
3
U>
(I)
o
C
:J
a.
OJ
~
c
3
00
,...
>
c
(Q
c
U>
~
5'
(I)
.,.;
5'
~
OJ
Iii
3_
01
o
oR.
U>
OJ
:J
a.
(Q
~
:J
""
(I)
0:
3
(I)
OJ
U>
C
Cil
V>
~
G)
iil
a.
(I)
>
m
c
fil
-<
'0
~
C
U>
aJ
iil
:J
a.
N
o
!=
~
c-
OJ
(Q
U>
00
(I)
:::
iil
a.
"l
a.
(I)
'0
5'
O"tl
:IE OJ
OJ Cil
:loO
o ;;!,
a ~
:IE 5
:J -,
'0
o (I)
- ~
-I
::T
o
~
:J
U>
~ w
(Q(Q
Q!.~
Ol~
'N
::T '
,... ::T
. ,...
N-
....N
'....
o '
f>~
- ~
01'
Ow
?fl. 0-
-<'
~~
IlO
01
o
oR.
;u
(I)
a.
aJ
OJ
(Q
U>
mm
!>> ~
W
01
<0
<0
...
WN
Ol~
ow
... ...
....
Co
o
00 00
00
00
...
... ...
~
-.J
en
W
?'
~
o
.N~
00 -.J
~~
00
00
-IOx::03"OOaJ
5:IEOJ~'O:IE:lEc
..,m:J CDQ)m~
:J~Q)"TI:::!.~~~
m g-gel::!!mOJ-
00 =::J lIJ "'"" x
~ - (I) 3
CD ~.=CJ OJ
o :J W c:. :J
c.S G) C/) a.
m w::T Q)
5' C/J
~ en
iil
OJ
wwwwwwww
cococccccococcco
;~.:~.:~.:~.:~~ ~ ~
.....lo.....lo.....lo.....lo.....lo.N.....lo.I\,)
~~~~~~~~
:::T::T::T::T::T::T=r::T
--------
:.....:.....:.....:.....:.....:.....:.....:-.
en C/) (J) VI (f) C/I (f) f/)
"0"'0"0"0"0"0"'0'"0
:"" :"" :-s :"'" :"'" :"'" :"" :""
~~~~~~~~
90.: 00000
o f> ~ f> f> f> r r
o
"
mmmmmmmm
!>> !>> ~ !>> !>> !>> !>> !>>
~ ~ ~
WO'IWC:ONN.I:\o.W
NW(O-.,jNQNN
ift-Elt-ER-EAi:R-t:R-ER-t:R
....lo......lo......lo. ....lo......lo.
c.now(X)~oo(X)
00000000
00000000
<M<M~~~~~~
~
~
COc.n01O>J:a,.NJ:lo,f\.>
OOWO<OOOONOI
!::l!::l:--'!'>00000l
00000000
00000000
~~
05'
~~
~~
1':::0
_0
3~
"tl
OJ
3"
~ ~
....0
,- .
~O
02~
Q~
, (I)
::TO
~ 3.
U> (I)
'0 :J
(I)
o
3'
(I)
:J
mm
~ !>>
W
01 01
... ...
woo
....N
00
00
00
... ...
~
~.""
co ~
00
00
00
00
G)C
o <
0:(1)
(I) 0
:J OJ
-1"-
~
c
3
'0
a
-I
~
(I)
(I)
~Ol
NQ1
,. (Q
~OJ
:'J~
00 ~
(fJ-~
'O~
,., Ol
N';
~~
iq"W
0- ~
~q
U>
'0
,.,
OJ
o
!!!-
mm
OJ OJ
....~
......
01....
01 w
!=>!'>
00
00
... ...
N
..,....
ow
ON
00
00
I
..
III
-<
i:
~~
-10
m-
;:00
-;:0
>0
1;;>
1/00
~ii=
o!'l
;:0-1
~i::
~.
-"
O:J:
Ill>
o III
Im
m=
0>
C
r-1Il
m-l
;:0
m
m
;;l
o
>
"
m
Ul
~
C
-I
:;;
o
>
-I
6
Z
"
;:0
o
'-
m
o
-I
~
o
-
..
=
n'
!.
Z
..
3
CD
o
o
3
3
o
=
Z
..
3
CD
III
i:r
CD
I/O
III
"C
CD
n
::;;
n'
..
-
0'
:J
C
=
==
o
~
C
=
==
o
o
..
-
-I
o
[
(/)
.,.
"
-
o'
"
<l>Z
!lJ~~
=n"m
i'ir;~
~z~
6-tr-
zl>D
~~C
"6~
~~~
ffi m ffi
:lE!!l(/l
mil/O
~l>!:
a;iil~
::j(/)cn
:I:(/Ie:
e: "
Z ~ !ill
.... m m
m n z
~::~
OOr
'T1." Ci5
(') Z ....
ol>m
~ r- 0
"0 Z
l> Z ....
n In :I:
-t :::::j m
em!:
ODl>
n e: ....
i )> ~
m !i :;
::!i ~ !;;
~ )0 RO
'" Z ~
-I ~ ::tJ
:I:""
,,!: III
:~6
WfJ)cn
e: n
" :I:
m m
!: C
m e:
z r
.... m
-
lD
a:
if
3
-
c
::
"
..
j
0'
"
m
..
~
~
-i
;lJ
,
-C
l..
c:
"
::;:
c:
"
::;:
o
o
..
-
w
" 0
C3cn*
_. c
.,. CT
" ~
-o~
-ilito
~-8
~
w
;lJ
11l
="
11l
0.
:C'
11l
-C
ll>
<
11l
3
11l
;a
s:
ll>
~
..
(J)
ib
11l
<
or
co
-
o
~
6'
"
!!!.
OJ
o
CD
~
'"
(J)
if
<
:;'
co
-
o
ar
0.
6'
"
!!!.
OJ
o
CD
~
~
~
0<0
0>
r
;:0
Z
11l
Vi
o
"
.....
Ol
....
.....
~
o
c
5'
,..
n
o
c:
'0
ib
..
<
ll>
:;;:-
11l
.....
161en....w.Al~a
(J))>
CD ::;"
11l;lJ
:5. CD
::J ==
col1l
--
9.<
CD e!.
0.<
_, 11l
o )>
" '"
!!!.'"
OJl1l
o 3
CD Q:
'<
.
-i
o
a
'"
'"
o
(J)
11l
..
iD'
'"
OJ
iil
'"
'"
m
ib
g.
..
5'
(J)
!!!.
:;'
o
0:
<
ll>
:;;:-
11l
C}C}C}C}
a a a a
-nen><><
ffJC5"P"P
o"'C~~
O;lJoo
(J)><-c-c
CD "'C 0 0
:::::!. 0 "C "0
m "9 C: C:
"'TIC:"'C "'0
_'0 ;lJ ;lJ
o (J) 0 0
O"C -_
a. ...., 0 0
OJll>-<-<
c:'<
C'(J)(J)(J)
Q:m~~
CD :::!. ffi' co'
...., m en UJ
CDQm~m~m~~~5'~~~'saUJ~.~~-~~~~n
~m~o~o~o""'-~UJ~~cr~~CD~~Q....,....,Q~o
:::r CD Dl _. OJ _. Q) _. a. ""'-J ~ or ;: ~ CD ..... =j" UJ m ...., ""'0 0 0 0 5
en::J ~ ~ ~CD~ro=~ro""'o~' ~~~~XXOCD
0:8 5 J:~::I:~ :c~-c.c: CD a.~~ ~~o =- 2:"'0 "'C~ n
11l__~_~_~_~<"~<",.. "'O"'ONww~<
OOCD-CD-CD-~~~.~ S'CD-'UJ-'~CD@,A8~QJ
-~g~g~g~UJ~~UJ~~o~i~::J~.~"'C91 o~
3 ::,- Dr I or I W I "'0 ::e ::I ~. ;:::t: ::I Q. CD = 3 0 "'C r::: :::0 :c ::I: ::I CD
CDUJ....,O....,O....,OCD-._~CD_O....,cr ....,5.....,X""'O"'C~::e
~~::eor::eor::eDr~.~O-.Nq....,aCD~.~.~CD~~' ~' ::E=;'
Q) = m en CD en CD en :::!'I Ul ;:::l 0 - (') <. _'"0 ""0 _ (') N _. _.
::J CDcZS.encZS.encZS.en t3:E"" Q) m"" &. <: ,::::j" CD 0 0 "U- ~ =rc.5
a~~~~~~~g~.g~'oo~~~"U~en,i~~~~~o
<::J~0~0~o::J~~3~~_~~'a~'nCD~~~~a
~BOooOooOooen~<gm'<~~~'3c.5~~~~~~~
m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "0 ~ Ia. (ii' ~ a ~ =t.g ~ ~ ~ 'go ~ ~"Co ~
_ ~ ~ ~ CDCD OCDO'O ~~~
00 ~ ~ ~..., CD_ ::J~3::!'CDm<C"U"C"C::J3
.~c ~g<agCD~ ~30'0000CDQ)
...... ..., _ Q) -. :: en _ "C "0 "C ::J '"
ac- <?<<g?<~'~~~."U::Jc:c:c:urCD
co Q)"Um<"U~>5'_0<i"O"O"O'
~. "11l <"o~Q)an=",oennx-><
CD 0 - -"0 - """
enax~~ ~'~ Q~.s:~
11l 11l 11l 11l 11l ~
"H'H"
~
OlW
0>0
~Cow
"'0>0
.....<00
~oo
000
m
!l'
r
:n
0>
o
'"
~
m
'"
o
'"
~
;."
0>
~
o
o
r
:n
....
o
'"
'"
....
'"
o
'"
<0
m
~
o
o
,
:n
0>
o
'"
'"
Ji>.
o
o
'"
~
<0
'"
~
o
o
mm
!>> !>>
W <0
"''''
'"
en'"
~:J:t.
00
00
"''''
.....'"
en ~
00l
00
00
m
ll>
-mmmmm
~ !>> !>> !>> ~ !>>
E
~
11l
r
ll>
ro w
...,0l~0l~
~())OlNCO~
:P~-En--En- ~-En-
'0
:;'
COw
5'~
:J:o
11l 0
ll>
~-En-~~ ~ ~
o
o
'" ~
e~(..)w~
-......loot..> ~ ())
~O-......lCOO
oom""'-Jo
00000
00000
~
o
'"
....
Ol
en
'"
o
....m
ow
00
00
0>
010
wo
00
00
'"
....
'"
en
o
'"
o
o
'"
o
"
-<
~
o
S-
a
or
(J)
8
..
'0
5'
lh
-<
~
~
-i
m
;:u
>
r-
en
SIO
~
;:u
"
III
6
(/)
o
:r
m
c
c:
r-
m
05j
g ;:u
~C5
CD~
.. 6
z
~
-I
m
;:u
>
r-
(/)
c
CD
..
"
..
-6'
-
0'
"
en
N'
CD
SIO
(/)
"0
.,.
"
::;;
n'
..
-
0'
"
c:
"
::;:
~
c:
"
::;:
o
~
-
-i
o
[
16/
-l
::0
,
'U
l..
4l8<
~
~ji:~
enCllC
CD=-._
3i::0
O(=j::O
')>O~
;::r-C
ac."
om:!:
2.::0>
O>OCll
WOm
01:=
Qz):..
~'~
en CIl
I:
"'tI
"'tI
r-
in
C
"'tI
~
c....
m
o
-l
:::j
m
s:
CIl
I:
'0
lC
~
III
C.
(ll
S-
o.>
'"
(f)
![
5'
::>
o
o
::>
~
CD
~
d
~
r-
"'tI
::0
o
c....
m
o
-l
o
o
CIl
-l
CIl
CIl
c
S:m
[0>
0."
o
c
::>
~
"'tI
...
.2,
CD ....
~<:n
..g
CD,
30
III 0
~
....
'"
-."
'"
:-'
~
o
.... ....
-en
"'0
00
0,
' 0
80
16 I
AIR
December 18, 2007
Prepared by:
Danyl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes
Tessie Sillery, Operations Coordinator, Collier County Department of Altemative Transportation Modes
Radio Road MSTU Proiect Status
(R-15) ACTIVE (Darryl Richard); Quote for 'By County' Items Bid 08-5004; Quote request per
Contract 07-4083 "On call Electrical Repairs and New Installation - County Wide" (material Group
93972; Contractors: 115198 Hart's Electricallnc; 112810 American Electric of Miami Inc; 100913 EB
Simmonds Electric; 115640 Mizpah Electric; 103553 Paragon Electric Systems; 102779 Southwest
Electric)
12-17-07: Final Quote from Ag Tronix received for materials cost.
12-18-07: Bid/Quote Package sent to Purchasing & McGee & Associates; McGee to confIrm content of
quote package and make recommendation and/or release for bidding.
( R - 14) - ACTIVE & ONGOING-Landscape Maintenance Contract (POC: Darry Richard) Contract
#05-3686 Part II Radio Road MSTUIMSTD Roadway Grounds Maintenance.
MSTU FUND: 158 (old 150)-162545-634999-600811
THIS PO IS FOR MSTU FUND (150) ONL YlNotice To Proceed (P, 0, #4500048335)
MSTD FUND: 112-163652-634999-620141
THIS PO IS FOR MSTD FUND ONL Y
Contract Expiration Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Notice To Proceed (P, 0, #4500048336)
7-28-05: Original NTP for Contract issued (I year initial contract; 3 renewal periods of I year)
2-20-07: ConfIrmation of repair of Irrigation Mainline on Devonshire Fund 158 (MSTU)
10-12-07: New Fiscal Year 07/08 - NTP given with PO,
10-16-07: Committee motioned for Advance must attend meetings,
11-20-07: Contract Section: Contractor's Attendance states: CONTRACTOR'S MEETING
A TIENDANCE
"During the Contract Period, the Contract Manager or an Advisory Committee if applicable, may have
questions concerning maintenance issues, The Contractor shall be required to attend monthly meetings and
other special meetings that the Contract Manager should require, There shall be no additional charge for
attendance to these meetings, If the Contractor fails to attend the monthly meetings without an excused
absence an amount equal to two (2) hours of the supervision labor rate as listed on the Bid Page shall be
deducted from the monthly billing of the Contractor against the Contract total."
11-20-07: Advanced Lawn has confIrmed attendance at monthly meetings as per staff request.
(R - 13) - ACTIVE & ONGOING (PaC: Tessie Sillery) - Annual Services Contract: McGee &
Associates
9-19-06: Radio Road MSTU Committee Approved proposal from McGee in the amount of: $11,445,00 for
annual consulting services.
11-3-06: NTP was given to McGee & Associates with a Project Completion Date - September 30,
2007.
9-30-07: PO Rolled into FY07-08,
10-19-07: Committee Approved Annual Contract with McGee $ $11,950,00
11-7-07: County staff requested McGee to revise proposal.
11-20-07: Work Order has been submitted for staff review, Approval of Work Order and PO issue pending,
12-11-07: PO and WO issued Notice To Proceed (P, 0, #4500089487)- WO # TLO-MA-3614-08-04
Project Name: " Annual LA. Consulting Services"; Fund # 153-162521 - Golden Gate MSTU
December 11, 2007 , based on Work Order Completion date is: December 10, 2008.
1
16/
A18
(R- 12B) &(R-16) (Combined Bidding) - ACTlVE- LANDSCAPE & IRRIGA TION PROJECT (Pac:
Danyl Richard) - Radio Road MSTU: (pbase One & Pbase II-A) Landscape & Irrigation - Add
Corporate (CO Pending)
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
Radio Road MSTU: (Phase One & Phase II-A) Landscape & Irrigation
FYI:
PHASE
Start. End Date
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PHASE
100"10 Submittal
21 DAY BIDDING
BID DUE
BCC APPR
NTP Material Purchase
90 DAY (Material Purcbase & Irrigation Install)
CONST-COMPLETE
NTP CONST
90 DAY CONST
CONST -COMPLETE
Start - End Date
9/21/2007
10/5/2007-11/6/2007
11/6/2007
12/11/2007
1/16/2008
1/16/08-4/14/08
4/14/2008
4/15/2008
4/15/08-7/15/08
7/15/2008
(Irrigation, and Plantings) - Work Order for Design to be initiated in FY-06 (October 1,2005);
Construction Cost: $810,000,00; Design Cost: $64,300,00 McGee & Associates
4-10-07: Re-use availability is questionable at this time, Roger Dick reports it may be wise to wait until re-
use line is run up to Radio Road as part of current Santa Barbara Project.
4-13-07: Discussion with Roger Dick and Pam Lulich indicate that Re-Use department supplements Re-
Use with Well water during 3 months of the year (typically April, May, and June), Thus water staining may
occur during these 3 months of the year to existing curbing and/or other structures over-sprayed with
irrigation water.
4-17-07: McGee recommends mixing tanks for project. Committee votes to add mixing tanks to project.
5-23-07: McGee recommends not adding Corporate Section to project at this time as it is not entirely
curbed with Type F Curbing,
7 -19-07: Overall Committee consensus - not to include Corporate Section into Phase 1- Landscape and
Irrigation.
7-23-07: 90% plans - still pending - no plans
8-22-07 90% plans - still pending - no plans
9-12-07 : 100% plans received for bidding - pending Purchasing
11-07-07: Bid 08-5004 -received on 11-6-07 - Hannula low bidder- Bid tabs are pending,
11-20-07: Bid Tabulation received from Purchasing Dept. Hannula is low bid for both base bid
($363,957,06) and alternates ($100,477.56)
12-11-07: Contract approved by BCC on 12-11-07- Awarding Hannula,
12-17 -07: Awaiting Contract issue through purchasing,
(R- 21) - COMPLETE- (POC: Darryl Richard)- 9-19-07 - Dale Lewis moved to direct Staff to ensure
numbers are re-stenciled on each island. Second by Betty Schedule, Motion carried unanimously 4-0,
10-16-07: Staff verified - stenciling is in the contract with Bonness
2
16/
A
18
Median stenciling delayed until completion of curbing project - additional 20 days was added to the
schedule on curbing project, Median Numbers will be reviewed upon completion of Bonness Curbing
Project.
12-15-07: Bonness completed painting of numbers on curbing as per Radio Road Curbing Project
(R - 12A) - COMPLETE- (Pac: Darryl Richard)- Radio Road MSTU: Phase One - Curbing
(Devonshire to Broadview Dr) (Curbing, Irrigation, and Plantings) - Work Order for Design to be
initiated in FY-06 (October 1,2005); Construction Cost: $810,000,00; Design Cost: $64,300.00 McGee &
Associates
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
Radio Road MSTU: Phase One - Curbing (Devonshire to Broadview Dr)
PHASE Start - End Date
DESIGN 9/11/06-1/29/07
14 DAY Quotes from Annual Contract 5/11/2007-5/25/2007
BID DUE 5/25/2007
BCC APPR 6/26/2007
NTP CONST 7/17/2007
90 DAY CONST 10/15/2007
CONST-COMPLETE 10/15/2007
12-15-05-McGee sent notice to go 'on hold' for Project.
3-06-06 - McGee to revise scope of project as per Don Scott,
3-20-06 - McGee sent 'Go Ahead' on Work Order.
4-4-06-McGee submits request to modify work order in amount of $6,696.00 (submit for Committee
Approval)
5-1-06; Radio Road Curbing Plan 30% Submittal Review is pending, May 2, 2006 meeting to address
Access Management issues.
5-15-06; Access mgmt. Meeting on 5-3-06 : as per Diane Flagg project will be phased into Phases I and
Phase ll, Dale Bathon confirming with funding from transportation and Don Scott confirming with
Transportation Administration,
5-30-06; Project is to include 3 phases, mcgee & assoc, to provide scope for phase 1. - Pending
Phase 1- From (Devonshire - West to western most boundry of Berkshire Lakes Subdivision)
Phase II - From ( Western most boundary of Bershire to Livingston)
Phase III - From (Livingston to Airport)
6-12-06: McGee & Associates preparing proposal for phase I, and waiting on fmal billing on old work
order.
6-27-06: Need McGee proposal for phase 1.
7-12-06: Need McGee proposal for phase 1.
8-4-06: MSTU approved McGee Proposal for Phase I
8-22-06: Work Order for McGee Phase I is in process of SAP upload. PO number is pending, NTP is
anticipated by August 24, 2006,
8-25-06: Diane Flagg request verification that the Total Amount spent will not exceed the original Work
Order Amount of $64,300,00 (versus new proposal for: $17,330,00)
9-11-06: McGee & Associates sends correspondence in response to Staff request for confirmation of
anticipated cost for consulting for Phase I, ll, and III combined, Copy provided for September 19, 2006
Radio Road MSTU regular meeting,
9-11-06: Notice to Proceed issued to McGee & Associates for Phase One Project; TLO-MA-3614-06-16; p,
0, #4500066290; Total net project is $17,330.02; Work Order time-line of 140 days with Project Start Date
is September 11,2006 and Project End Date is January 29, 2007,
3
161
9-19-06: TECM Engineer Dale Bathon submits proposal for advancement of a portion of Phase 11 Project
into the Phase I project scope from Livingston Rd, to Kings Way, The Radio Road MSTU Committee votes
to not include this section in Phase I Project. Phase One project schedule: Design Complete January 29,
2007; Bidding Phase February 2007; BCC Approval of Award March 13,2007; NTP April 30, 2007;
Construction 120 time-line with Completion by August 30, 2007
11-21-06: McGee 100% submittal for Curbing Phase I has been rejected by TECM Engineers - TECM
recommends Sub-Consultant Engineer for Curbing Plans, TECM requires Signed & Sealed Plans by State
Licensed Engineer prior to approval.
1-16-07 Proposal from McGee for Sub Consultant - to be reviewed by Committee
1-17-07 Committee approved McGee for Sub Consultant - $ 2,510,00
1-29-07: Called and left message for Consultant to revise spreadsheet on costs.
2-13-07: McGee revised spreadsheet included in proposed Change Order # l.
2-20-07: Change Order #1 is being reviewed by Staff for approval. Inclusion of Engineer Sub-consultant is
only item in Change Order.
3-8-07: NTP for Change Order # l.
3-20-07: Formal Request sent to McGee for confIrmation of delivery of 100% Drawings prior to 3-30-07
4-16-07: Coordination meeting for Public Meeting to be held May I" from 5 to 7 PM, 100% plans (revised)
pending from McGee,
5-2-07: TECM revisions as per PIM Meeting forwarded to McGee, Revision due by 5/10/07,
6-19-07: Novus item - 16B - BCC meeting of 6-26-07 - Bonness, Inc. $ 433,885.43
7-10-07: Bcc approved, - PO request submitted on - 6-27-07 with Signed Work Order,
7-10--07: Pending release from purchasing for PO,
7-17--07: NTP given to Bonness
7-18-07: Discussed overall project with Bonnes & set up weekly meetings - beginning August 3,d
8-22-07: Root pruning to magnolia trees - ETI - trees to be moved upon receipt afPO-
pending BA.
9-10-07: Budget Amendment processed by Gloria and we received PO for ETI on 9-4-07.
9-18-07: Change Order # 1 pending
10-22-07: Change Order Processed and notification went out to McGee & Assoc.
11-07-07: Change Order #1 pending.
(R-20) -COMPLETE - (I'.O,C DaITvl) - Root Pruning & Removal and relocation of Trees on
Radio Road
8-22-07: Notice to Proceed - ETI - $1,750 for root pruning and within 3 weeks (after BA) is
approved the PO will be increased with the difference, ($8,530,00 is the total amount of estimate)
9-10-07: Week of9-24th to 28th - anticipation of moving trees, - pending locates
9-24-07: Darryl met in fIeld with ETI and to be completed by 9-26-07,
9-26-07: Project Completed
(R-20) -COMPLETE - (l'.O,c. Darryl) - Root Pruning & Removal and relocation of Trees on
Radio Road
8-22-07: Notice to Proceed - ETI - $1,750 for root pruning and within 3 weeks (after BA) is
approved the PO will be increased with the difference, ($8,530,00 is the total amount of estimate)
9-10-07: Week of9-24th to 28th - anticipation of moving trees, - pending locates
9-24-07: Darryl met in fIeld with ETI and to be completed by 9-26-07.
9-26-07: Project Completed
(R - 17) - COMPLETE -TECM-Radio Road - (phase II-A) Curbing - Brairwood to Commercial &
Corporate (INFORMATION ONLY)
R-19) - COMPLETE - (P,O,C. Darryl) Corporate Square Pavers (P. O. #4500082550; dated 8/6/2007);
Work Order: BC-FT-3773-0710- (60 day Work Order) completion date October 6, 2007
4
A
1p
16/
A 18
7-23-07- Requested for Quote from Bonness for project
8-7-07: Notice to Proceed
9-10-07: To be completed by 9-11-07
9-11-07 : Project Complete
(R - 15) - COMPLETE, RE-USE WATER PROJECT PERMITTING PHASE (Pac: Darryl Richard)
3-08-07: Updated application for Re-Use Gallons per minute and approval pending
4-10-07: Re-use availability is questionable at this time, Roger Dick reports it may be wise to wait until re-
use line is run up to Radio Road as part of current Santa Barbara Project.
4-13-07: Discussion with Roger Dick and Pam Lulich indicate that Re-Use department supplements Re-
Use with Well water during 3 months of the year (typically April, May, and June). Thus water staining may
occur during these 3 months of the year to existing curbing and/or other structures over-sprayed with
irrigation water.
4-17-07: McGee recommends mixing tanks for project. Committee votes to add mixing tanks to project.
4-27-07: Utilities confinns that RE-USE Application has been approved and will forward hardcopy,
5-7-07: Re-Use Application is approved, Hardcopy scanned and forwarded to Mike McGee.
( R - 19) - COM PLETE- Painting of Radio Road Median Tips with Numbers - The median tips (bull-
nose) are to be painted yellow in accordance with FDOT standards with median numbers,
10-17-06: Committee approves not to exceed $2,500,00 for project. Directs staff to utilize annual
contractor. Trutwin annual is active for painting within ROW,
10-23-06: Direction to utilize 'in house' Road & Bridge Department funds and resources for project. Given
that the medians are 'County Properly',
11-20-06: John Vliet, Road & Bridge rejected plans to paint curb #'s on Radio Road,
11-20-06: Staff requested quote for Trutwin to paint curb #'s on Devonshire.
1-3-07: PO & NTP to Trutwin
1-29-07: Project Complete
(R-II) COMPLETE - SDP PLAN REQUEST; SDP 3425 Radio Road - Plan review by Committee for
Landscape Plans submitted for development.
11-21-06: This SDP Plan does not affect MSTUIMSTD plantings or irrigations,
(R - 15) - COMPLErE - Pavers for Foxfrre Medians
9-19-06: Radio Road MSTU votes to install pavers at the median tips (bull-nose) for the West Median and
East Median at Foxfrre,
9-19-06: Staff request Quote from Bonness for the paver installation,
10-10-06: Staff receives quote from Bonness in the amount of $9,257,70, Request to Purchase submitted,
11-6-06: Begin Construction of project by Bonness, [nc, pavers to match existing specification,
11-10-06: Project Completed
( R - 18) - COMPLETE - Radio Road Median Irrigation Conversion - Allamanda and Plumago Planting
Beds to be converted from drip line system to irrigation spray heads on risers.
10-17-06: Committee approves of conversion based on 112 funding no motion necessary, Mike McGee
advises Committee and Staff that conversion is necessary to ensure plant health,
10-30-06: Median irrigation conversion is progressing, irrigation mainline break is repaired during project.
11-6-06: Project Complete; Inspection for Punch-List to follow Nov, 6 to 9 for proper operation,
(R-IO) COMPLETE - SDP 7405 Devonshire Blvd- Plan review by Committee for Landscape Plans
submitted for development.
9-25-06: Plans reviewed with ROW, Contractor has removed shrubs on County ROWand will be required
to replace shrubs and damaged irrigation system.
10-17-06: Copy of Plans provided for Committee review. Landscaping found to be satisfactory.
(R-17) - COMPLETE - Committee Chairman request for infonnation regarding 'loan' to MSTU
5
161
A 18
9-19-06; Radio Road MSTU Committee Chairman request staff provide a report on options available to the
MSTU in so far as a 'loan' or advancement of funds. (I) What is the maximum amount? (2) Is there any
interest? (3) What is the amount of time allowed for repayment?
10-17-06: Staff provides answer as per discussion with Budget: (I) Maximum amount is determined by
'Project Need' which would be after all cost considerations are identified. Review and approval by County
Manager's Office/ County Attomey's Office Required; (2) Interest on loan would be negotiated through
County Manager's Office and County Attorney; (3) Amount of time for repayment would be negotiated
through County Manager's Office and County Attorney; Note: The advancement of funds requires Board
of County Commissioner's approval.
(R- 14) - COMPLETE -Request from TECM Engineer Dale Bathon - Phase II Project item
9-19-06: Dale Bathon submits plans for a section of Phase II project (Livingston Rd, to Kings Way) for
inclusion into Phase I project.
9-19-06: Radio Road MSTU Committee votes not to include Phase II item into Phase I project.
(R-9) CANCELLED -Well Water Mitigation (Chemical Treatment of Well Water)- Cancelled-
September 12, 2005: 8/16/05 committee cancelled project, Cost was determined to be excessive for annual
maintenance of filtration system,
(R - 8) - COMPLETE -Milage Rate (,25 vs .50) - Dale Lewis requested for the history at the Budget
(Cany Forward vs Audit - follow up meeting) with all the MSTU Chairman - 7-17-06
8-22-06: Sharon Newman's report is pending,
8-25-06: Norman Feder, Transportation Administrator accepts responsibility for the adjustment of the
Millage Rate from ,50 to ,25 (during FY-04 to FY-05), The Radio Road MSTU Committee may vote to
increase Millage back to ,50 for the FY-08 Budget Request. Currently the Radio Road Project Funds are
sufficient for current project demands,
(R -7) - COMPLETE: - Devonshire Maintenance (Fund 150)-Advanced Lawn Estimate 06-191; On
August 4,2006, By Committee Action, Committee approved $17,290,00 for items included in Advanced
Lawn estimate for Devonshire Maintenance (Fund 150), Scope of project is stump grinding, Vibumum
replacement and incidental irrigation repairs (included in quote, as per Frank Kip, owner)
8-24-06; Advanced Lawn Crews begin stump Grinding
8-25-06; Mike Luneke, Advanced Lawn confirms that stump grinding is at 100% completion, Staff to
inspect. Advanced Lawn will fmish planting of Vibumum by 8-26-06,
8-31-06: Project is complete
(R- 6) - COMPLETE - Radio Road Maintenance (Fund 112) -Advanced Lawn Estimate 06-184, 06-185,
and 06-186; On August 4, 2006, Committee reviewed items included in Advanced Lawn estimate for Radio
Road Maintenance (Fund 112), Scope of project is replacement of Juniper Plants, installation of mulch
material, and installation of irrigation components,
8-25-06; Mike Luneke, Advanced Lawn confirms that project is at 100% completion, Staffto inspect.
(R-5) COMPLETE - PROJECT TRANSFERRED TO CAT FUNDING-CAT Bus Shelter
(R-4) -COMPLETE- Sod Refurbishment at median I Radio Road at Santa Barbara -COMPLETE -
Advanced Lawn.
(R-3) -COMPLETE-Pump Repair -Radio Road- COMPLETE; Repair By County
(R-2) -COMPLETE-Annual Maintenance Contract Bidding-
July 28, 2005: NTP Contract 05-3686 Part II, issued to Advanced Lawn Maintenance - Completed
(R-I) COMPLETE -ARBORIST SERVICES CONTRACT; Committee requested McGee to provide quote
for arborist services. McGee Scope for Arborist Services cannot be approved as per LA 04-3614,
6
161
A
Landscape Architectural Services Fixed, Terms and Conditions, Additional Quotes requested as per
Committee Direction.
4-17-06; Davey Tree Company is low quote at $15,350,00 for both consultation and maintenance,(submit
for Committee Action)
5-1-06; Documentation for Request to Purchase submitted. PO is pending,
5-15-06: Project complete with Field Inspection pending
5-30-06 Inspection complete - contractor to perform additional final pruning late fall,
6-27-06: Final pruning in fall to be done
7
18
-
'2
::;)
,
!:>. --~
1-
~
,
I
i
I
!
~II
~I
'Vi
<1l
,<,2
>
:;;
if>
I-
&ll ;;
'-';
01 ':;:: ;3-1
0::1',; ..- ,S;;
a. ' ~~ i a.:
z': ~ cO CDi;...
,~I !~i~ g ~i
:a::i =, 0,
w ~ 0 0:"::1
~ull;1 l~ ~!~
>-i ro fJ -s,
~;...::: ell::
~I ::i;c..:'E S9
_ O!C(:.~ 01
WL U'r-' (0"1 O'JI
0:::1 Q) 0 Trli.=::
c I (/) a.. c: OJ .:::::
wi iE .2"..- c E
:J l.L -@:Wi"e- ~
I ~Ii.~ ~ ~ ~ ~
= ::2o'''Q) '-'
o C/)Q.)CU-o..:2~
.- I c:..... 0 01
0. >lc,2 Q)'-IQ.
, - W 1-1 0 ! Cl) I Q..! 0 ::r I
lu Z Z,O'E Q.)jO,Qi
I~ 0 ~_C) \- <.)1~!OI
'..u OiO ill"> i'>
~~UI'2::CO w"'" Q)
E<("Q)i3(/)~V)
," :J::W'I(f) Q) co Q) co
..= a.. :J!.~ ~ ::2 - u
- 0 ..JI.;:; ll) i5',-'5
~<(OIa5a:::<l)=:g
III 0 UI- OI_
l- e::: --; ~ ~ ~ y:~
c: 0:) ....,::-,........ ......
,2 _ ..: <i: ;<i:<i:<i: <i:
t) Cieri ' i '
4l <( i .
<Il 0::\::;:,
..- C'J M -.:t-,t{)'
----+- -----;---'- -- -I
0::'
16 I
~18
"
-
'"
-
,_.,
'5 i
iwi
..,j
-
~
'-
o
I-
~
0:
0011 ,3
~Ii :U
wi, I~'
',1-'1" 151
i-I 03-';::'
'1--'- r:ti
:U1c U5
;,wll-E OCI
:""') 0 v
01n ...,
,.,.,'-','.......
"a: 11251;::;
10- C0
IUJ CU! J.)
':J U5 -g
0.1 <D i "-'"
,a........,tli
'::)1 c' =
<Il15.!,-, '
- \-,Q)
_ o'e:
I- 01-=
20).=
::;)1'" '"
Ooe
Ui'- '-
~11.s .s
~'o .-..
!!:il!~ ~
..J :,'" C0
..J'U ()
0'_ -
U';- >-
....,Ij~,]
~Ii~,~
f-: 10) IU)
~l !
~'; .
~ N
0::'0::
I
--~--'--,-
I
1-----1--
! I
,
000001'0 '00 C
00000 0 alo 0
U; i~l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ll' i~ll~l~l ~l
~ I':I~ ~-""/ ~.\ ,"". <D'i~1 I~-I
: ~ I)_I ~IY>' -1..",:L _,_ I 1"'1-.,.[
,~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I~ ~Il I~
(J !ooooc-' 'o::::i :00,'-1 0
_ '0. o. 0.""."". "I Iwl N ""I" !u
~ ;- ~ ~ 111 to 1'5-1 !~! :1l1- to- '5-! 't;
-------j --1---,- ~ '0 1 ~;w
I~I~!W~WW'~ U ~:~~, i~
; ----+-,--->--- -;----1 g; 1 i W 1 -------~--I-: ~i--1 ~
co co! eni co! cui ail ,001 cui m! 51 ia..
W.I..LJ!WiWIW1o:::! -'~! ._~-i~!uOI---'-;;},
-----;-~~--:i >0: 'e::: "'-
_I 1 ---c---:_- ----'~- "; I-
i;- ;-i......i'\"""";...-j c:,::r: ,............~, C
I I : I, "'I ,I- ,-' 1-'
1 18 I~ 'I~I I
! ~~, ~!
-: -i-
I- (fJ
<Ii 0
. U
:;;: I-
<ii' u
- U1
,8 ..,
..Q 0
,0::
(j) ,,.,'
','......'
, ,
, '
--------------------
, '
~
>-
'"
'"
~i
;i
,-
e!
'iiil
~,
~i
c::
o
'..l
il'
'E! ,
s:i~
'" ~
!!: ~
0) 0
~ U
~ ~
=13
-5 ='
';;: "'I
> "Ci
-g,:.a
.~ ~
u-
o
en
en
'"
en
C
'"
,,=
E
e en
- C
<ii '"
> .'!::
o
E ~,
Q) ~,
'- 'Os::
~,~
'-ien
a;,QJ
:C'~
:::I .::
f.ni"O
c:
'0
..Q
en
'"
-
'"
,!,:
'0
U),:
w'-
.....11 i
,01'::::'
2'<('
I
I
!----'---
0:::
~i
,
,
--t-T-----:--'---'-
,
u~-i
---------~_.
010 gl ~I 16 I
00 Ala
00 0
0 0 0
.".- '" '" 01
'" '" OJ ~-!
'" '" '" "'I
0 0 '" (/)
- 0 0 E l-
'" ., (/)
0 0 0 .. 0
u 0 0
.". '" - U
,;: u
" '" '" ., l-
:::l '" '" '~ u
0
~ UJ
~o.. ...,
>- 0
- ~
"
::l a.
0 ..J
U <(
,;: '" l-
OJ OJ - 0
:::l W W 0 l-
-
.c
-,
(/)
"
(5
f.J
;:: .,
.c
~ >-
OJ
U5 E
N '0
('0 ~
.s ;;;
(J) E
v "
OJ .2
C'> '"
~
=- <ll
::l ;:
;; 'f
0..
(/) " cC
:;: -
'" .. r--
UJ s:
l- u
'" '"
~
l- '" -
U ::l "
., 0
UJ ~ u
..., ., ~
>. 0 .c 0
- ~ - :0
0
0.. .c "
.. -
'" c '3 '"
UJ UJ '0
::; '0 .c
.,
0.. - '"
0.. '"
" '<:3 .c
0 :::l -
(/) 0 E
-.;: '" '"
,9- >- 0 '" 0 ,,;
~ l- "2- '" ~
~ - E
u 2: " '" '"
'" :::l 0 '0 E .,
., 0 " OJ :> ,;:
C UJ if) ~ ., 0 '0
- (/) u Ol ,;: E
<( OJ a. .,
E a::: '2 '" ~ !!! '"
:I: :;:
., a. UJ 0 " .c 0
.. ::; a " i!:
c .?= '" -
'0 ..J :;; ., - '"
m <( 0 ;;; - u
N '" .,
0 u '" u ~-
- a::: (,) ,- .c '"
" ::; ro '0 ::l '-'
0 E " (/) -= '" ii
0 ...: ';:: UJ
-.;: C " t5 "
'-' (/) U) l-
'" <( ,.,"" 0 ..
en a::: ::;; if) W 2: <i' a:::
~ ~;
>a:::~
~
AG.TRONIX
SPECL\IJU(IIN MOTOllOU IRRIGATION CONTllOl. SYsroIs
1304 N. 15th STREET
IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142
239-657-5519
16/ A 18
QUOTA TION/PROPOSAL -"
DATE
QUOTE NO,
1ln/2007
832
CUSTOMER NAME
Collier County DOA 1M!fransportation
2885 HorsesOOe Drive South
Naples, FI. 34104
RECEIVED
DEe 1 C 2007
Transportation
ATM Dept.
TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT
Net 30 SLT
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL
REVISED 12/17107 per conversation wJMike McGee
Radio Road Phase I Landscape lrrigation Project
Bid#08-5004
Controller PI & C4
PI .8 Scorpio AC 8 Station w/Radio in Large Double
Door Cabinet
F2848A UHF(450-470MHz) Scorpio AC 2in/80utwl HT750 I 1,325,00 1,325,00
Radio
800.()365 12v Power Supply LDA50F 4.3amp 1 100,00 100,00
800-7106 H-IN-5 AC Power Cable I 0,00 0,(1)
800-711l H-OU-9 DC Power Cable I 0,00 0,(1)
SB-24DSS SS Enclosure DD 24W X 36H 24D I 2,280.00 2,280,00
PED-24DSS SS Pedestals 24W X 12H X 20D I 585,00 585,00
MLB-8-AC Surge Protector AC 2in/8out I 266.50 266.50
85836 Low Profile Aot UHF 450-470 MHZ I 90,00 90,00
51020-WM Leviton S urge Protection I 176,00 176,00
8299-AW GFI W!Switch Leviton (l5Amp) I 39,00 39,00
T-II Single Gang Box I 0,00 0,00
Controller C4- Scorpio 16 Station wlRaclio (18" Cahinet)
F2848A UHF(450-470MHz) Scorpio AC 2in/8outwl HI750 1 1,325,00 1,325,00
Radio
FLN2154A Scorpio AC VO Expansion Kit I 225,00 225.00
800-0365 12v Power Supply LDA50F 4.3amp I 100,00 100.00
Thank you for )Qur business. TOTAL
QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS,
SIGNATURE
Page 1
AG.TRONIX
SPEClAUZING IN MOlOROl.\ IRRIGAnON CONnloL mIlS
1304 N. 15th STREET
IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142
239-657-5519
18
QUOTA TION/PROPOSAL
16/
A
DATE
QUOTE NO,
11n/200?
832
CUSTOMER NAME
Collier County DOA lMffransportation
2885 Horsesooe Drive South
Naples, Fl. 34104
RECEIVED
i"iEe i e 2007
Transportation
ATM Dept.
TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT
Net 30 SLT
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL
800-7106 H-lN-5 AC Po""r Cable 1 0,00 0,00
800.7111 H-OU-9 DC Power Cable 1 0,00 0,00
SB-18SS SS Enclosure 18W X 36H X 12D 1 1,290,00 1,290,00
SB-18SS SS Enclosure 18W X 36H X lID I 1,290,00 1.290,00
MLB-8-AC Surge Protector AC 2ini80ut 2 235,00 470,00
85836 Low Profile Ant UHF 450-470 MHZ 1 90,00 90,00
51020-WM Leviton Surge Protection 1 189,00 189,00
8299-AW GFl W!Switch Leviton (l5Amp) 1 39,00 39,00
T-ll Single Gang Box 1 0,00 0,00
Thank you for )Our business. TOTAL
$9,879,50
QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS,
SIGNATURE
Page 2
AG.TRONIX
SPEClAUlINllH MOTOROlA 1RRI1iA11OH COImIol S'mEHS
1304 N. 15th STREET
lMMOKALEE, FL. 34142
239-657-5519
161 AIR
QUOTA TION/PROPOSAL
DATE
QUOTE NO,
Un/200?
833
CUSTOMER NAME
Collier County DOA 1MITransportation
2885 Horsesooe Drive South
Naples, Fl. 34104
RECEIVED
[ C"- 1 (\ ~007
~J... !) 1... I
TransportatIon
ATM Dept.
TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT
Net 30 SLT
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL
REVISED 12117/07
Radio Road Phase II Landscape Irrigation Project
Bid#08-5004
Controller C2 & Existing Controller C4 @GlennEagle
Controller C2- Scorpio 32 Station wlRadio in Double
Door Cabinet
The bid calls fQr upgrade of 16 station Scorpio Controller
to a 32 station. The cabinet is not big enough and is not
to Collier County current standards. Please see attached
pictures.
Recommendation: Ccntractor to remove existing
controller and make arrangements for delivery to
Ag- Tronix. Ag- Tronix will rein~iall controller in large
double door cabinet with new surge boards and power
equipment. The Scorpio controller will be upgrared to a
32 station Scorpio and ready for delivery to the county,
for installation. by a contractor.
F2805A Scorpio V2 AC 2 in/8 out I 800,00 800,00
FLN2154A Scorpio AC VO Expansion Kit I 225,00 225,00
800-0365 12v Power Supply LDA50F 4.3amp I 100,00 100,00
800-7106 H-lN-5 AC Power Cable 1 0,00 0,00
800-7111 H-OU-9 DC Power Cable I 0,00 0,00
SB-24DSS SS Enclosure DD 24W X 36H 24D I 2,280,00 2,280,00
Thank you for )Our business. TOTAL
QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS,
SIGNATURE
Page 1
AG.TRONIX
SPICWJ1ING IN MoToROU IRRIGATION CONTROL S1sTI:MS
1304 N. 15th STREET
IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142
239-657-5519
161 A 10
QUOTATION/PROPOSAL
DATE
QUOTE NO,
lln/2007
833
CUSTOMER NAME
Collier County DOA TMffransportation
2885 Horsesooe Drive South
Naples, FI. 34104
RECEIVED
DEe 1 C 2007
TransportatIOn
ATM Dapt.
TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT
Net30 SLT
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL
PED-24DSS SS Pedestals 24W X 1211 X 20D I 585.00 585,00
MLB-8-AC Surge Protector AC 2in/8out 4 266.50 1,066,00
85836 Low Profile Aot UHF 450-470 MHZ 1 90,00 90,00
51020-WM Leviton Surge Protection 1 176,00 176,00
8299-A W GFI W/Switch Leviton (15Amp) 1 39,00 39,00
T-ll Single Gang Box 1 0,00 0,00
Existing Irrinet to upgrade from 32 station to 48 station.
Please see attached picture referring to Irrinet Glenn
Eagle. The old cabinet does not meet Collier COlUlty
current standards. Recommendation: Contractor to
remove existing controller and make arrangements for
delivery to Ag~Tronix. Ag-Tronix will reinstall controller
in large double door cabinet with new surge boards and
power equipment. The Irrinet controller will be upgraded
to a 48 station and ready fer delivery to the county, for
installation by a contractor.
SB-24DSS SS Enclosure DD 24W X 3611 24D 1 2,280.00 2,280,00
PED-24DSS SS Pedestals 24W X 1211 X 20D 1 585,00 585,00
85836 Low Profile Ao! UHF 45D-470 MHZ (Low power radio, 1 90,00 90,00
High power radio has Omni directional antenna on site.)
FLN2016A 16/4 Mixed VO AC M<Xinle Kit 1 800,00 800,00
MLB-8-AC Surge Protector AC 2in/8out 6 235.00 1,410,00
51020-WM Leviton Surge Protection 1 189,00 189,00
8299-AW GFl W/Switch Leviton (15Amp) 1 39,00 39,00
Thank you for )Our business. TOTAL
QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS,
SIGNATURE
Page 2
16/
A 1 R
AG.TRONIX
SPECLW!ING III MOTOIlOl.\ IRRIGAnON CONTROL SYsTEMs
1304 N. 15th STREET
1MMOKALEE, FL. 34142
239-657-5519
QUOTA TION/PROPOSAL
DATE
QUOTE NO,
1ln/200?
833
CUSTOMER NAME
Collier County DOA lMffransportation
2885 Horsesme Drive South
Naples, FI. 34104
RECEIVED
DEe 1 B 2007
Transportation
ATM Dept.
TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT
Net 30 SLT
ITEM DESCRIPTION QlY PRICE TOTAL
T-II Single Gang Box 1 0,00 0,00
TSI Technical Services 8 75,00 600,00
Thank: you for )Our business. TOTAL
$11,354,00
QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS,
SIGNATURE
Page 3
16/
A "liEf
298 Sobol Polm Fiood cjaples, H 34 i 4
Telephone : 239,732.4624 - fox: 2397320077 Em oil info@ allofoaples,co m
December 14. 2007
t~~'rr1Je !'1.'I+,ol
Collier County, Transportation Department
2885 Horseshoe Dr. S
Naples. Fl 34104
Attn: Darryl Richard
We are pleased to submit for your consideration our proposal to provide
the following landscape Service at: Radio Rd; Naples, Fl
SCOPE OF WORK
LandscaDe service:
Install 90 Crown of Thorns (red)
1 gallon across from Taylor Rental on Radio Rd
90 Crown of Thorns at $ 12.00 each
$ 1, 080.00
Install 90 Bags of Eucalyptus Blend Mulch
to plant bed.
90 bags of Mulch at .70 per bag
labor only
$
43,00
Total: $ 1143.00
'~
"\
~' ,
j
:
'.\ .,'V'
\. ~
(07-051 Radio Rd. Landscape prop. 12-12-07)
161
A
1 2e 25, 2007
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
__ 1)f (7\1 ) WATER AND W ASTE/W A TER AUTHORITY
rlala ---------
Halas ..L~-----< ,-
I~ennlng _ ,---~
Joyle .- - ,V--
,-:oletta - ----
Naples, Florida, June 25, 2007
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Water and
Waste/Water Authority in and for the County of Collier, having conducted
business herein, met on this date at 2:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION in
Room 610 at the Community Development and Environmental Services
Building, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, Florida, with the following
members present:
CHAIRMAN: Lowell Lam (Excused)
Robert Bennett
Dr. Fay Biles (Excused)
Jack Markel
Jerry Morgan
ALSO PRESENT: Jamie French - Executive Director, Operations Mgr, CDES
Kenneth Kovensky - Sr. Accountant/Operations, CDES
Tom Palmer - Assistant County Attorney Mise, Con<es 10 (A {q
Date:
Item 11:_
Copies to.
/
161
A June 25, 2007
19
I.
Call to Order and Roll Call (Determination of Quorum)
The rneeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Robert Bennett at 2:08 P,M,
A quorurn was established.
II.
Approval of Minutes - Meeting of March 26, 2007
Mr. Markel moved to approve the minutes of March 26, 2007. Second by Mr.
Morgan. Carried unanimously 5-0.
III. Items Requiring Action by Authority
A. Ave Maria Utility Company, Tariff Sheet
Modification for Miscellaneous Services (Page 5 of Packet)
An updated Revised Sheet No. 14.0 with the Old Base Facility Charge and
new gallonage charge was included in the packet and reviewed.
Mr. French asked the Authority to approve the inclusion of the form of
thc Tariff sheet for the Company's Wastewater Tariff.
Mr. Markel moved to approve the inclusion of the Wastewater Tariff
sheet in the Company's Wastewater Tariff. Second by Mr. Morgan.
Carried unanimously 3-0.
IV. Staff Discussion
A. Staff Update - CDES Office of Operations and Regulatory
Management Web Site
Mr. French updated the Authority on the current changes in personnel.
. He answers to Joe Schmitt,
. The Website was explained and can now be viewed publicly, The
link will be given to the Authority,
. Ken Kovensky is the Senior Accountant for Mr. French's
department and his back up,
B. Upcoming Authority Meetings
Staff doesn't favor short agenda's but the rneeting was necessary for
the Ave Maria's item,
Mr. French did not foresee any case's in the next few months,
An updated Organizational Chart was requested and is available to the
Authority,
V. Open to the Public
Kim Retallick - Orange Tree Utilities - answered questions and gave a brief
update for the Authority. The following are some of the staternents made:
· Has made irnprovements within the Organization
. Introduced the Supervisor for Customer Services
2
161
ite 25,109
-,.;..
.
Can now make payments with Credit Cards
May have a Website in 6 months
Discussed AMR's
Will have onsite training done in August for higher tech rneters
Utility expansion - rnaking progress -waiting for building (SDP has been
submitted)
Have a total of ],8]0 customers with 22 cornrnercial accounts
No longer have the odor problem
.
.
.
.
.
.
Mr. French suggested a tour oJOrange Tree Utility along with Ave Maria at
the same time, Commissioner Coletta will be invited.
VI. Authority Members Discussion - None
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was
adjourned by the order of the Vice Chair at 2:20 PM.
COLLIER COUNTY W A TERIW ASTEW A TER
AUTHORITY
to
<7;1~
These minutes approved by the Board/Comrnittee on -.fA 8/0 <:) C 8' ,
as presented /' or as amended . r
3
.." ,- , i)s~, \1
ria a ".---
,
Halas
Henning
Coyle
Coletta
;r,' I,
"""," LJ II
A a~CF!\fEr.J'
r '0 U b iGU8
8U<ild ,.,r COUI1!'1 (;,j!mn;S~~;(Jn0rs
lltuUi.""t 8Mc. M.s.7.1e.
A""'sc>,,, Oo".".ltt..
270!i Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, 1'1. :-\4104
January 3, 2008
AGENDA
I. Call Meeting to Order
II. Attendance
III. Approval of Agenda
IV. Approval of Minutes: December 6,2007
V. Transportation Services Report
A. Budget Report - Caroline Soto
B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard
VI. Landscape Maintenance Report - CLM
VII. Old Business
VIII. Working Group Update's
A. Utilities - Charles Arthur
B. Maintenance - Bruce Forman
C. Tax Analysis - Bud Martin
D. Liaison - Dick Lydon
IX. New Business
X. Public Comment
XI. Adjournment
The next meeting is scheduled for 2:00 PM, February 7, 2~~Corres
At ST. JOHNS PARISH LIFE CENTER ~ \
625111TH Ave. Date \.)
Naples, FL.
f\~
"em#:
-J 's to
/
R~.("'~ (\ .tr=~
i
161
'."f'.'
I It"'
~ i~:--'; '({IU8
LI ""'-",..;
n ~"~'L'iin:c-
.....
".."."", BMC. M.s.7.1t.
November 1, 2007
Advisory eolltlltltt..
~70S Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, Fl, :-14104
~ IcHi?, ,_H - "-"-." -
llalas .' -:./rt-..
Hennlng,:'l I", ,.' ...
',OyI8ZV.> "~
'~o'et1<lMrt'iO'tE"$'
I. The meeting was called to order by Dick Lydon at 2:00 P.M.
II. Attendance
Members: Bud Martin, Carol Wright, lew Schmidt (Excused), Dick lydon,
Charles Arthur
County: Darryl Richard - MSTU Project Manager, Tessie Sillery - MSTU
Operations Coordinator, Caroline Soto - Budget Analyst
Others: Jim Fritchey - ClM, Darlene Lafferty - Mancan
III. Approval of Agenda
Add: VII. A. Approval of Applicant
Bud Martin moved to approve the agenda as amended. Second by
Charles Arthur. Motion carried unanimously 4--0.
IV. Approval of Minutes - October 18, 2007
Charles Arthur moved to approve the Minutes of October 18, 2007.
Second by Carol Wright. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
V. Transportation Services Report
A. Budget Report - Caroline Sote distributed and reviewed. (See
attached)
. Open P.O.s $68,983.30
. Available Operating Expense115,436.54
B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard distributed and reviewed
(See attached) reported the Staff has not received a response from
FPl on the ROW.
Dick Lydon readdressed the installation of the bridge. Stated due to
closure of the road widening of the bridge should occur simultane~lt\""
Involvement by the Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association was
recommended. 1',"
:~enl u:___ __
1
16 ,
A20
VI. Landscape Maintenance Report - CLM
Dick Lydon commended CLM on the frond removal from the corner of
Vanderbilt & Trade Winds. Noted the material was left by Comcast 10 days
prior.
Dick Lydon requested a letter be sent to Waste Management insisting on a
route reversal for trucks to operate from South to North. Noted the current
route tramples the landscaping.
Darryl Richard confirmed with Mr. Lydon that the problem was the turn
radius for the trucks.
Dick Lydon responded the existing North to South route damages the
landscaping on both sides,
Darryl Richard stated he would contact Waste Management.
Dick Lydon inquired which plants would replace the dying Ixora,
Jim Fritchey responded the Dwarf Fire Bush would be used.
Jim Fritchey reported spraying for Thrips & Broadleaf,
VII. Old Business
A. Approval of Applicant - Dick Lydon noted that Jackie Bammel
withdrew her application.
Bud Martin moved to correct Pg. 3 V. B. Paragraph 6 should read
"Bruce Foreman" of the October 18, 2007 Minutes. Second by Charles
Arthur. Motion carried 4-0.
Charles Arthur moved to recommend to the BCC that Bruce Foreman
be appointed to the Committee. Second by Bud Martin. Motion
carried unanimously 4-0.
VIII. Working Group Update's
A. Utilities - Charles Arthur - None
B. Maintenance - Lew Schmidt - None
C. Tax Analysis - Bud Martin - None
D. Liaison - Dick Lydon - None
IX. New Business - None
X. Public Comment - None
Dick Lydon thanked Carol Wright and Lew Schmidt for the hours spent
working with the Committee. Noting they would be greatly missed.
XI. There being no further business for the good of the County, the
meeting was adjourned at 2:40 P.M.
2
16/
Vanderbilt Beach MSTU
Advisory Co "ttee
Dick Lydon, Chai n
/~ /CJ7
,
These minutes approved by the Committee on
as presented or amended
The next is scheduled for 2:00 P.M., December 6,2007
at ST. JOHNS PARISH LIFE CENTER
625111TH Ave.
Naples, FL
3
A20
16 I A 20
....
"aM""" B... At.s.7.1e.
Advisory 00".".111..
2705 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, FL :-14104
November 1, 2007
Summary of Minutes and Motions
III. Approval of Agenda
Add: VII. A. Approval of Applicant
Bud Martin moved to approve the agenda as amended. Second by
Charles Arthur. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
IV. Approval of Minutes - October 18,2007
Charles Arthur moved to approve the Minutes of October 18, 2007.
Second by Carol Wright. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
VI. Old Business
A. Approval of Applicant - Dick Lydon noted that Jackie Bammel
withdrew her application,
Bud Martin moved to correct Pg. 3 V. B. Paragraph 6 should read
"Bruce Foreman" of the October 18,2007 Minutes. Second by Charles
Arthur. Motion carried 4-0.
Charles Arthur moved to recommend to the BCC that Bruce Foreman
be appointed to the Committee. Second by Bud Martin. Motion
carried unanimously 4-0.
Fiala
Halas _0\-___
H ' ,\11'
enl1lng_____._
Coyle ~--
c!.-/'
oletta _ -----
"11II11.,"" BMe. M.s.7 .IC"'" u'~"uPrv (;"""","suoo,,,
161
A
~C!,::,!VED
" 'I \1 ,,?,S
C' ). 'J dIU
AdviSOry eollllllllt..
~70!i Horseshoe Dlive SOUdl
Naples, FL :-l4104
December 6, 2007
MINUTES
I. The meeting was called to order by Dick Lydon at 2:05 P.M.
II. Attendance
Members: Bud Martin, Dick Lydon, Charles Arthur, Bruce Forman
County: Darryl Richard - MSTU Project Manager, Tessie Sillery - MSTU
Operations Coordinator (Excused), Caroline Soto - Budget Analyst
Others: Darlene Lafferty - Mancan
III. Approval of Agenda
Add: IX. A. Street Lights
Bud Martin moved to approve the agenda as amended. Second by
Charles Arthur. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
IV. Approval of Minutes - November 1, 2007
Change: Page 2. Correct spelling should read "Bruce Forman."
Charles Arthur moved to approve the Minutes of November 1, 2007 as
amended. Second by Bud Martin. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
V. Transportation Services Report
A. Budget Report - Caroline Soto distributed and reviewed. (See
attached)
. Open P,O.s remaining $65,289.03
. Available Improvements General $3,770,900.00
Charles Arthur reported there was an article stating the Florida Fund
was in distress. Noting the Florida Fund was a shared pool &
questioned if it would affect the Vanderbilt MSTU's ability to access
Funds,
Caroline Soto responded that the Vanderbilt MSTU Funds would not
be affected.
B.
Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard distributed and reviewed
(See attached) reported 1 active project - Power Line Underground
Installation, Stated the project was set to go before the Board otlate,
1
:~e('r it-.
.---.....-...----
16/
A 20
County Commissioners on November 27, 2007 noting a revision to the
ROW Agreement was required. (See Attached)
Charles Arthur reported the following:
~ FPl announced a attachment from the original ROW Contract
"Exhibit C" - Defined as the drawing for the location of all
underground lines within the Vanderbilt MSTU, was not available
~ Payment was requested by FPl to initiate the Engineering Report
required to produce "Exhibit C"
~ FPl was advised that payment would not be made until the ROW
Agreement was signed
~ After review of the revised ROW Agreement it was discovered a
provision was inserted "FPL could terminate the ROW unilaterally
if the MSTU did not enter into an underlying construction
agreement within 6 months of signing the ROW Agreement"
~ FPl was questioned if the above terms were required & if so the
Vanderbilt MSTU required a minimum of 2 years
~ A revision was made to page 3 paragraph 5 Term. to include
"However, this agreement may be terminated by FPL upon written
notice in the event a separate Underground Facilities Conversion
Agreement is not entered into within two Years of the date of this
agreement"
~ It was noted Construction must commence within 6 months or
forgo deposit monies
Charles Arthur moved to approve the agreement as redrafted.
Authorize the Chairman Lydon to sign the agreement & authorize
payment of the Engineering process. Second by Bud Martin.
Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
Charles Arthur reported the ROW Agreement was on the December
11, 2007 Agenda for the Board of County Commissioners.
Dick Lydon requested notification from County Staff if the ROW
Agreement was on the Regular Agenda for the Board of County
Commissioners.
Discussions ensued. Confirmation for the Work Started Deadline was
requested in order to seize the 25% discount.
Discussions continued it was determined a timeline from FPl was
needed,
Dick Lydon reported the entry light sign at Blue Bill is inoperable,
VI. Landscape Maintenance Report - CLM
The expiration date for the ClM contract was questioned. Dick Lydon
noted their absence. He requested the monitoring of side Street bushes
that are overgrown. Noting it was a safety issue due to poor visibility.
VII. Old Business - None
2
161
A 20
VIII. Working Group Update's
A. Utilities - Charles Arthur - Previously discussed V. B,
B. Maintenance - Bruce Forman was appointed.
C. Tax Analysis - Bud Martin - None
D. Liaison - Dick Lydon - Requested Jackie Bammel obtain Board
Resolution from the VBRA.
Diane Flagg arrived 2:41 pm
IX. New Business
A. Street Lights
Dick Lydon stated the 2 County installed street lights at Moraya Bay
Condominium on Gulf Shore Dr. were no longer needed. Relocation of
the lights was recommended.
Discussion ensued & was determined the lights would be donated to
Parks & Recreation.
X. Public Comment - None
XI. There being no further business for the good of the County, the
meeting was adjourned at 2:58 P.M.
Vanderbilt Beach MSTU
Advisory Commi
(
/)/
_,?/L/t <-
Dick Lydon, Chair
These minutes approved by the Committee on I J... I It, I 01
as presented ,/ or amended ~
-
The next is scheduled for 2:00 P.M., January 3, 2008
at ST. JOHNS PARISH LIFE CENTER
625111TH Ave.
Naples, FL
3
....
161
III1111f.""t BII*. At.s.7 A.
A 20
Ad"lsory eo....ltt..
270!i Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, FL a4104
December 6, 2007
Summary of Minutes and Motions
III. Approval of Agenda
Add: IX. A. Street Lights
Bud Martin moved to approve the agenda as amended. Second by
Charles Arthur. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
IV. Approval of Minutes - November 1, 2007
Change: Page 2. COlTect spelling should read "Bruce Forman."
Charles Arthur moved to approve the Minutes of November 1, 2007 as
amended. Second by Bud Martin. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
VI. Transportation Services Report
B. Project Managers Report
Charles Arthur report the following:
~ A revision was made to page 3 paragraph 5 Term. to include
"However, this agreement may be terminated by FPL upon written
notice in the event a separate Underground Facilities Conversion
Agreement is not entered into within two Years of the date of this
agreement"
Charles Arthur moved to approve the agreement as redrafted.
Authorize the Chairman Lydon to sign the agreement & authorize
payment of the Engineering process. Second by Bud Martin.
Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
16/
A 20
Thursday, December 06,2007
Prepared by:
Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes
Tessie Sillery, Operations Coordinator, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes
Vanderbilt MSTU Proiect Status
Note; Committee not meeting for June/July/August.
(V A-23)- ACTIVE -(POCo Darryl Richard) Ballpark Estimate & Committee Approval
5-3-07: Committee request that Staff call a Special Meeting only if ROW Agreement is received.
Committee states that Approval of the Ballpark Estimate will not be considered until County has received
ROW Agreement from FPL. Next Meeting is September 6, 2007,
5-16-07: Estimate received from FP&L - $6,680,650,00 - Survey is not included,
5-20-07: FPL confIrms that additional detail will be provided with Engineer's Binding Cost Estimate.
7-19-07 : FP&L Right of Way Agreement from Grover Whidden - County Attorney's reviewing
9-10-07: Committee still waiting on agreement with the pending estimate,
10-18-07: Committee has provided necessary Approval for Engineering deposit in the amount of
$56,712,00, Engineering Deposit fee will be included in Executive Summary to BCC on 11127/07,
(V A-18) - ACTIVE-ONGOING (Pac: Tcssie Sillery)- Maintenance Contract - Contract #05-3687
"Vanderbilt Beach BeautifIcation MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance"; Current Renewal Period
expires December 13,2006, PO#4500052464; dated 10/06/2005; Commercial Land Maintenance (Vendor
100671); Notice of Award sent December IS, 2004; First Contract Period 12/14/04 to 12/13105; Second
Contract Period 12/13105 to 12/13/06; Note: 2 additional renewal periods remain. (Maximum
extension tbis contract is to 12/13/08)
(V A-IS) - ACTIVE -- (Pac: Darryl Richard) -Power Line Underground Installation
FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT: $6,151,000,00
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
Vandl/rbilt MSTU: ROW Ag"",,,,,,nt Phu.. FPL Po_r111l4l. UnCll/rground Installation
PHASE Start . End Date
4/2.312007-5/112007 (2 week FPL
ComlTlitlTlent)
111712007
111712007 (actual)
12/11/2007
A~ Bee Approval & committee approval
12/1112007-6127/2008
612712008
12/281200&
7/27/2007
7/27/20(j7.1124/09
1124/2.009
I
Legal Review
Finalized ROW Agreement
Final Document
Bce APPR
Pay~ to FPL 66 k
FPl binding Cl)St "simate El mo.
FPL Binding CO$t estimate Due
180 day (project must atart by date)
NTP FPL PrQjact construellon
1 SO day constructlon
Projact Complete
Project Preliminary Research Phase; Construction Cost: $6,151,000,00;
1
161
A20
Preliminary Phase; FPL Request Further Breakdown of Project into 1/2 of Gulf Shore Drive for project cost
to come in at approximately 3,5 million, MSTU Committee Sub-Committee Chair for FPL (Charles Arthur)
to set up meeting with Commissioner conceming his request for a meeting with Committee representative,
FPL representative (Grover Whitten), and representative from Homeowner's Association (member TBO),
Subcommittee Chair Charles Author was to meet with Commissioner Frank Halas regarding this request
and report to Staff. Tom Kuck, of Collier County, Engineering Services Department, Engineering Services
Director is new contact as per Charles Arthor, Currently the Project is not moving forward due to budget
constraints, unresolved procedural issues (lack of documentation from FPL i,e. Right of Way Agreement
for the purposes of relocation of existing utilities and future relocation of existing and installed utilities as a
result of the project. During the 1-6-06 MSTU Budget meeting the option ofa 'Revenue Bond' was
mentioned by Mike Isackson he said that this would have to be confmned, FPL is to provide the requested
document for agreement between FPL and Collier County,
4-17-06 -ACTIVE - FP&L to provide agreement for right of way - pending
5-1-06 - Need Documents from FPL in order to proceed with project.
5-15-06- Charles reported that FP&L would have it in a few weeks and will report to proj, mgr,
5-24-06-Call Jamie French to follow-up on status of FPL reI. to County Activities
5-30-06 - Jamie French reports Grover Widden is waiting for public service commission to approve
agreement with collier county and 25% matching funding,
6-12-06 - Contacted Jamie French to obtain exact meeting times/dates which the Public Service
Commission will be considering the 25% FPL cost sharing proposal and the Vanderbilt Beach FPL
Powerline Burial Project.
6-27-06 Contacted Jamie French to obtain exact meeting times/dates which the Public Service Commission
will be considering the 25% FPL cost sharing proposal and the Vanderbilt Beach FPL Powerline Burial
Project.
7- 18-06 ; Review by public service commission - pending on approval ofBCC Vanderbilt Ordinance-
Amendment.
8-7-06: BCC approval on 7/25/06 for ordinance revision to include burial of power lines,
8-22-06: Jamie French confmns meeting with Grover Whiten (Andy Whitely-alternate) and CDES staff on
August 24, 2006 to review 'Hardening' program, Currently the Public Service Commission has not
approved the 25% matching program by FPL (pending), Additionally, Kate Donifrio, FPL reports that they
have yet to receive the fmal copy of the' agreement' for ROW utilization for the project from the FPL
attorney office,
8-24-06: Jamie French, CDES, Diane Flagg, A TM Director, and Tadd Pluck, TECM Engineer attend
CDES/FPL Meeting of August 24, 2006. Still under review Oct-Nov Public Service Commission will
review to approve FPL proposal of 25% Cost Sharing and Right of Way Agreement and Depreciation value
is under review. Funding for private individuals cannot be publicly funded (question), Switch Boxes above
base flood elevation (question),
8-31-06: Jamie French communicates that Tadd Pluck has the Right of Way Agreement that Grover has
been referencing to in previous conversation.
9-14-06: Jamie French reports that the County Attorney is reviewing the proposed ROW agreement. And
that the Fleriela 8tate Legislature and Public Service Commission has to approve the 25% proposal from
FPL. After these approvals the MSTU Committee needs to consider plan to fmance the proposal which is
about 6 million (2006 FPL quote),
12-19-06: Copy of ROW Agreement forwarded to County Attorney Scott Teach for review.
1-3-07: Copy sent to Thomas Palmer County Attorney
1-10-7: County Attomey - FP&L agreement under review
1-17-07: Meeting to be set up with Charles / Grover Whidden lDanyl/ Diane - regarding agreement
1-24-07: Meeting was cancelled due to Charles being out of town and other information needs to be
distributed,
2-28-07: Requested state statute # - Florida Statutes, ~ 337.403(1),
3-23-07: Request for Drawings from Vanderbilt Sidewalk Project to Trinity Scott
3-26-07: Review of Survey Data with Paul Masters and Ray Magsumbol
3-29-07: Meeting has been scheduled in the BCC Conference room - Date: April 12, 2007 - at 2:00pm
- attendees - County Mgr/ Commissioner Halas/ Charles Arthur, Kathryn Donofrio and FPL members,
The meeting agenda includes :Review of the fmal draft of the ROW agreement Engineering Design and
Construction timeline ,
2
161
~o
4-12-07: Meeting at BCC office, FPL will work on Agreement with County Legal. Final Version of
agreement requires BCC approval. Submittal ofrevised project quote request pending Committee
review/approval. Coordination with FPL Working Group Leader Charles Arthur on revised quote request in
preparation of Committee approval.
4-23-07: Scott Teach sends documentation for agreement to Grover Whidden, FPL response pending due
by April 26, 2007 as per commitment in meeting 4/12/07,
4-24-07: Request for re-quote of ballpark estimate sent. Revised estimate due by May 15, 2007 from FPL.
5-16-07: Estimate received from FP&L - $ 6,680,650,00 - Survey is not included,
5-25-07: Grover Whidden indicates that agreement would be produced by June 15,2007,
6-15-07: Agreement has not been received from FPL.
6-19-07: Phone conversation with John Lehr, FPL confIrms that the MSTU would have to provide a survey
of the project roadways, John Lehr will forward a sample drawing for use in obtaining scope of services
from surveyors, John confIrms that the 25% GAF will be assessed in the CIAC Estimate, John confIrms in
order to qualify for GAF 25% project is required to have 3 pole miles, and homeowner hook-up is to be
completed within 6 months of last major power supply connection. Project may be phased for a total of 3
pole miles, however, time in between projects (phases) cannot exceed one year from end construction to
begin construction,
7-19-07: (Grover Widden) FP&L Agreement emailed to County and County Attorney's reviewing
agreement
9-4-07: Request sent to Scott Teach to obtain fmalized agreement.
10-8-07: FPL and County Legal reviewing a fmal version of agreement.
10-11-07: County Attorney - Teach sent fmal version of agreement to County Staff,
10-16-07: Right of Way agreement was emailed to Committee members.
10-18-07: ROW Agreement presented to Committee; Vanderbilt MSTU Committee approved ROW
Agreement as submitted. ROW Agreement will be forwarded to FPL for approval prior to going to BCC on
Nov, 27,2007.
I H-07: Response from FPL is still pending. Deadline for BCC 11/27/07 is 11/08/07,
11-7-07: FP&L Agreement email to us by Scott Teach,
12-6-07: Revised agreement submitted for approval by Committee prior to 12-11-07 BCC Date,
(V A-22)- COMPLETE -{POCo Darryl Richard) Parks & Recreation Signs
1-3-07: Murdo - parks & rec. - addressed committee on design
1-29-07: Murdo will report to Committee at 2-1-07 regular meeting,
2-1-07: Murdo reported with approx, estimate - committee agreed to spend up to $12,000,00
2-21-07: PO sent to Murdo for $15,500 of which Parks & Rec will be IGC'ed at time of invoice $4,000,00
4-5-07: Got the following update from Murdo Smith - Permit has been issued and the sign is being
constructed, Murdo will meet up at the site with Lykins to get the proper placement of the sign,
4-26-07: Murdo Smith indicates that sign location will be further from intersection.
5-2-07: Scan of 'sign location map' sent to Lykins Signteck and Collier Parks & Recreation to confIrm sign
location for Landscape Maintenance Working Group,
7-20-07: ConfIrmed with Murdo Smith - Sign footings have been installed - concrete base
8-12-07: Sign installation is completed with sign logo(s).
(V A-17) - COMPLETE -Conversion to Motorola Irrigation Controller,
9-14-06: Committee votes for staff to proceed with conversion to Motorola Controller.
9-22-06: Site inspection and coordination with existing project drawings.
10-3-06: VerifIcation of specifIcation for Motorola irrinet controller with Irrigation Project Manager Roger
Dick. Request for Quote from E.B, Simmonds is due by Oct, 20, 2006, E.B. Simmonds to provide all
electrical components,
10-18-06: E.B, Simmonds quotes complete project at $22,790,00; requires Committee Approval in order to
proceed,
11-2-06: Committee votes not to proceed with Motorolla Irrigation Controller Conversion,
11-2-06: Project cancelled,
3
16/
A 20
V A-19) ~ COMPLETE-SDP PLAN REQUEST-Request for SDP Plan for Developments within MSTU
Boundary - As per MSTU Committee discussion on 10/5/2006.
11-17-06: No Plans on record as being submitted for review in Transportation per John Podczerwinsky.
Plans once received will be forwarded to MSTU Liason Staff for review.
(V A-16) - COMPLETE -eLM Outstanding Maintenance Items
Added on September 14, 2006: l. Replace 2 valve boxes (and/or covers) at Pine and Vanderbilt Drive.
2. Cut the tops of the ficus hedges as per Working Group direction during previous walkthroughs.Replace
3. any dead and or dying bougainvillea and trim all bougainvilleas to eliminate all leaders. (Comments
regarding "north of Tradewinds' bougainvillea - inspect for replacements and/or pruning)
10-5-06: Item #2 and #3 completed.
10-26-06: Item #3 Completed; all valve covers are in place.
(V A-21) ~ COMPLETE -Request for Staff assistance with vehicles parking on irrigation heads and valves
along Vanderbilt Drive.
10-20-06: Margie Hapke, Public Infonnation Coordinator, Public Utilities/ Admin; contacted regarding
Committee request.
10-23-06: Margie Hapke sends notification to all field crews to avoid parking on grass and in particular
sprinkler heads and landscaping within Vanderbilt MSTU Boundary.
(V A-20) ~ COMPLETE -Request for FPL to trim trees from around power lines.
10-05-06: Committee request to have staff contact FPL to have them trim powerlines within the MSTU
Boundary .
10-20-06: Becki Daniels, FPL, Vegitation Management, Senior Utility Arborist West Region contacted
regarding Committee request.
10-26-06: Becki Daniels has deligated inspection and corrective action with 'Mike' ofFPL field arborist
maintenance crew. Trees are to be inspected and pruned as per standard FPL practices.
(V-14) COMPLETE -Bench Replacement
QUOTE RECEIVED FROM ANNUAL CONTRACTOR V ARrAN CONSTRUCTION FOR
$16,104.00 ($10,229.00 Installation; $5,875.00 Materials) February 10, 2006.
3-06-06 - CLM to provide quote as per committee request.
4-6-06 - CLM quote for $3,057.20 Approved by Committee April 6, 2006.
4-12-06 - Bench Order PO Sent to Contract Connections - Order will be shipped to CLM.
5-1-06 - Product order is pending, CLM is ready to install.
5-15-06 - No change in status waiting on material.
5-30-06 - Mark Adams reports bench order will arrive within two weeks and are being shipped
to CLM.
6-12-06 - Still waiting for delivery.
6-21-06; Check w / Mark Adams on status
6-27-06; Order will be delivered in two weeks - Per Mark Adams
7-12-06; Order was to be shipped outjuly 11th - in transitto commercialland maint.
8-14-06: Order received by CLM and will be installed beginning August 23, 2006. Installation is to
be complete by September 1, 2006.
9-14-06: Installation Complete By Commercial Land.
(V- 1) - COMPLETE- PROJECT-REVISION TO VANDERBILT MSTU ORDINANCE
5-25-06-Scott Teach contacted regarding revision.
5-30-06 - Scott Teach is workiog on revising ordinance.
6-12-06 - Darryl emailed the revised ordinance to scott for approval & Dick Lydon.
6-27-06: Revising original draft coordinates and adding fiscal.
7-18-06 - BCC to approve Amended Ordinance 2006-7-25-06
4
161
~ 20
7-25-06: BCC Approves Ordinance Revision.
8-22-06: Revision to ordinance is complete
(V-2) COMPLETE-Report on Interest Rate for MSTU. Derrick Johnson reported the interest earnings for
the Vanderbilt MSTU Committee. The Committee requested that Derrick provide an annual tabulation of
the interest earnings since the creation of the MSTU in 2001.
3-20-06 - Tessie has request meeting with Derrick Johnson.
4-17-06 - Derrick Johnson to attend next MSTU
5-1-06 - Derrick Johnson to provide 5 year report on interest earned.
5-1506 - Derrick Johnson provided and committee satisfied with report.
5-15-06 - Committee requested an additional report with mstu report.
5-30-06 - Complete: Derek reported at mstu meeting. May 4th.
(V-3) PROJECT CANCELLED-Effluent Connection - Project Preliminary Research Phase; Construction
Cost: $900,000.00; Design Cost: $170,000.00;
(V-4) COMPLETE-Bluebill and Baker Carroll Point Planting Project - Project Complete July 1,2005;
$ll ,006.00
Project Complete
(V-5) -COMPLETE - Bluebill and Gulf-Shore Drive -Project Complete August 30,2005: Construction:
$2,571.00;
(V-6) -PROJECT CANCELLED-Plantings Bayview @ Gulfshore Drive - Cancelled 8/16/05; Construction
Cost: $1,590
(V-7) PROJECT CANCELLED -Channel Drive@GulfshoreDrive-Cancelled8/16/05;Construction
Cost $1,590
Project Scope to possibly include irrigation.
(V-8) - PROJECT CANCELLED - Street Sign Project-Pending Vanderbilt HOA Approval: Construction:
$15,390.00
Requires HOA Approval. Project is not approved by HOA (10-18-05 report from Lew Schmidt).
(V-9) - PROJECT CANCELLED-Plantings III th at Vanderbilt Drive Plantings.
(V-IO) - COMPLETE- Sod Refurbishment Project - Project 50% Complete; Construction & Materials
Cost: West Area ($3,999.20); East Area ($3,999.85).
Project 100% Complete on 10/1/05
(V-10) -NON-MSTU PROJECT-Gulf Shore Drive Sidewalk Project-Pathways-Non-MSTU Project; Trinity
Scott to report on the status of this project.
Trinity Scott to report Status. Change Order to project is being processed.
(V -II) -NON-MSTU PROJECT-Sidewalk Project-East Side of Vanderbilt Drive (Vanderbilt Beach Road
to Illth Avenue- Non-MSTU Project; Pathways Project; Trinity Scott to report on the status of this project.
Trinity Scott to report Status
(V-l2) - COMPLETE, Vanderbilt Drive - Plant Material Replacement Project. Need to review plant
locations with Commercial Land Maintenance prior to installation. Schedule at next sub-committee
meeting. Meeting to be scheduled after Lew Schmidt's meeting with HOA on 1/9/06.
(V-l3) - COMPLETE-BACKFLOW PREVENTION-REPLACEMENT; Backflow preventor failed to
operate. Reported on 3/22/06 and repaired on 3/28/06.
5
16,
A 20
COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY
AGREEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND CONVERSIONS
THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this _ day of
, 2007 by and between the VanderbiJt Beach Beautification Municipal Service
Taxing Unit, by and through its governing body, the Board of eommissioners for eollier
eounty, Florida (hereafter, "VanderbiJt MSTU"), the Board of eommissioners for
eollier eounty, Florida (hereafter, "Local Government") whose mailing address is 3301
Tamiarni Trail, East, Naples, Florida 34112 and Florida Power & Light eompany
("FPL"), a Florida corporation with an address of P.O. Box 14000, 700 Universe
Boulevard, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0429.
WHEREAS, Local Government may request that FPL convert certain overhead
electric distribution facilities located within and specifically limited to the following
boundaries within the VanderbiJt MSTU (the "eonversion"): Ail of that property lying
westerly of the centerline of VanderbiJt Drive from VanderbiJt Beach Road north to the
centerline of the Little Horse Pass Bridge (eollier eounty Bridge No. 030177); thence,
westerly along the meander line of the eocohatchee River until it meets the Gulf of
Mexico. Said lands being more fully depicted on the drawing attached hereto as Exhibit
"A" (collectively, the "Existing Overhead Facilities") to underground facilities,
including transformers, switch cabinets and other appurtenant facilities some of which
may be installed above ground (collectively, the "Underground Facilities") and has
further requested that certain of the Underground Facilities be placed in certain of its road
rights-of-way ("Local Government ROW'') and/or certain road rights-of-way owned by
or under the jurisdiction of other agencies ("Other ROW''). Local Government ROW
and Other ROW may be referred to collectively as "ROW"; and
WHEREAS, the Vanderbilt MSTU is considering paying FPL the cost of such
eonversion as required by FPL' s electric tariff and Section 25-6.115 of the Florida
Administrative eode and is also considering entering into a separate Underground
Facilities eonversion Agreement with FPL; and
WHEREAS, FPL is willing, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this
Agreement, FPL's electric tariff and Section 25-6.115 of the Florida Administrative
eode, to place certain of the Underground Facilities in the ROW, conditioned upon the
Vanderbilt MSTU entering into a separate Underground Facilities eonversion Agreement
and agreeing to pay the cost of such eonversion as required by FPL' s electric tariff and
Section 25-6.1 15 of the Florida Administrative eode.
NOW THEREFORE, in recognition of the foregoing premises and the covenants
and agreements set forth herein, and other consideration the sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties covenant and
agree as follows:
I. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated by
reference into this Agreement.
Page 1 of8
161
A 20
2. Conditions Precedent to Placement of Underground Facilities in
ROW
(a) Local Government covenants, represents and warrants that:
(i) Local Government has full legal right and authority to enter into
this Agreement;
(ii) Local Government has full legal right and authority to take all
actions and measures necessary to fulfill Local Government's
obligations under this Agreement;
(iii) Local Government hereby authorizes the use of the ROW by FPL
for the purposes stated herein.
(b) All applicable permits for FPL to install, construct, or maintain Underground
Facilities in ROW must be issued on a timely basis by the appropriate agency.
(c) The design and location of the Underground Facilities to which Local
Government has agreed are in compliance with all operational and safety
guidelines, codes and standards,
(d) Local Government agrees to provide within ninety (90) days from the date of
this Agreement, at its expense, a legal description that is acceptable to FPL of
the ROW to be occupied by the Underground Facilities at a time before FPL
initiates the design of the Underground Facilities. Said legal description shall
be made part of this Agreement and attached as Exhibit "B."
(e) Within a reasonable period of time after receipt of Exhibit B from Local
Government not to exceed one hundred and twenty (120) days"FPL agrees to
identify and document all existing FPL underground facilities within the
ROW that will not be included under this Agreement. Local Government
shall reimburse FPL' s reasonable costs and expenses to deliver said
documentation. Said documentation shall be made part of this Agreement and
attached as Exhibit "e."
(f) The parties agree that the construction drawings when prepared shall be
attached as Exhibit "D" to this Agreement and that the construction drawings
may be amended to reflect changes to location of the facilities as required.
3. Relocation and Rearrangement of FPL Facilities. If the Local
Government or other agency with control over the Local Government ROW or Other
ROW, for any reason whatsoever, requires that FPL relocate or rearrange, in whole or in
part, any Underground Facilities (as they are to exist as a result of this eonversion, or as
they may later be modified, upgraded, or otherwise altered) from or within the Local
Government ROW or Other ROW, the Local Government, notwithstanding any language
to the contrary in any applicable permit or franchise agreement, and prior to any such
relocation by FPL, shall provide FPL with a substitute location, satisfactory to FPL,
obtain any easements that may be necessary, and shall pay FPL for the costs of any such
relocation, adjustment or rearrangement, now or in the future. Local Government shall
reimburse FPL for all costs to locate, expose, protect or support the Underground
Facilities, whether underground or above ground, in the event of future construction or
excavation in close proximity to the Underground Facilities, when such services are
required by Local Government or other agency with control over the Local Government
ROW or Other ROW Local Government shall use its best efforts in any design and
Page 2 of8
16/
A 20
construction of its future road improvement projects to avoid or mitigate the necessity of
relocating or adjusting the Underground Facilities in Local Government ROWand, to
the extent reasonably practicable, in Other ROW.
4. Abandonment or Sale of Local Government ROW. If the Local
Government desires to subsequently abandon or discontinue use of the Local
Government ROW, and ownership of the land is transferred to a private party, the Local
Government, as a condition of and prior to any such sale, abandonment, or vacation,
shall grant FPL an easement satisfactory to FPL for the Underground Facilities then
existing within the ROW or require the transferee to so grant FPL an easement
satisfactory to FPL at the time of transfer. If ownership of the Local Government
ROW is transferred to another public entity, that public entity shall take the ROW
subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
5. Term. This Agreement shall remain in effect for as long as FPL or any
successor or assign owns or operates the Underground Facilities placed in the ROW.
However, this Agreement may be terminated by FPL upon written notice in the event a
separate Underground Facilities eonversion Agreement is not entered into within two
years of the date of this Agreement.
6. Title and Ownership of Underground Facilities. Title and ownership of
Underground Facilities installed by FPL as a result of this Agreement shall, at all times,
remain the property ofFPL.
7. Conversion Outside ROW. In the event that the FPL Underground
Facilities are not, for any reason other than the sole error of FPL or its contractors,
constructed within the ROW, Local Government shall grant or secure, at Local
Government's sole cost and expense, new easements or ROW grants for the benefit of
FPL for the placement of the Underground Facilities in these areas, and shall secure
subordinations of any mortgages affecting these tracts to the interest of FPL.
8. Agreement Subject to FPL's Electric Tariff. This Agreement is subject
to FPL' s electric tariff, including but not limited to the general rules and regulations for
electric service and the rules of the Florida Public Service eommission, as may be
revised, amended or supplemented from time to time.
9. Venue; Waiver of Jury Trial. This Agreement shall be enforceable in
eollier eounty, Florida, and if legal action is necessary by either party with respect to the
enforcement of any or all of the terms or conditions herein, exclusive venue for the
enforcement of same shall lie in eollier eounty, Florida. By entering into this
Agreement, FPL and the Local Government expressly waive any 'rights either party may
have to a trial by jury of any civil litigation related to or arising out of this Agreement.
This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida.
10. Attorney Fees. In the event it becomes necessary for either party to
institute or defend legal proceedings as a result of the failure of the other party to comply
Page3of8
161
A 2r
with the terms, covenants, or provisions of this Agreement, each party in such litigation
shall bear its own cost and expenses incurred and extended in connection therewith,
including, but not limited to attorneys' fees and court costs through all trial and appellate
levels.
I I. Assignment. The Local Government shall not assign this Agreement
without the written consent of FPL
12. Recording. This Agreement shall be adopted by the Local
Government and maintained in the official records of Local Government for the
duration of the term of this Agreement. This Agreement also shall be recorded in
the Official Records of the eounty in which the Underground Facilities are located,
in the place and in the manner in which deeds are typically recorded.
13. Conflict Between Terms of Permit or Franchise Agreement. In the
event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any permit or franchise
agreement entered into by Local Government and FPL, the terms of this Agreement shall
control.
14. Notice. Any notice, instruction or other communication to be given to
either party hereunder shall be in writing and shall be hand delivered, te1ecopied, sent by
Federal Express or a comparable overnight service or by U. S. registered or certified
mail, with return receipt requested. and postage prepaid to each party at their respective
addresses set forth below:
As to Local Government and Vanderbilt MSTU:
With copies to:
As to FPL:
Page 4 of8
Page 50f8
16 f A 20
16 5
~ 20
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Florida Power & Light eompany, Vanderbilt MSTU and the
Local Government have executed this Agreement on the date ftrst set forth above.
For and on behalf of the VANDERBILT MSTU
Advisory Committee, through its Chairperson,
By:
(signature)
Name:
and
By and through COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA as the LOCAL GOVERNMENT and
in its capacity as the governing body of the
VANDERBILT MSTU:
By:
(signature)
Name:
JAMES N. eOLETTA
Title: eHAIRMAN, BOARD OF
eOMMISSIONERS OF eOLLIER
FLORIDA
eOUNTY
eOUNTY,
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROeK, elerk
By:
Deputy elerk
Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency:
Scott R. Teach,
Managing Assistant eounty Attorney
Page 6 of8
16/
A
For FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
By:
(signature)
Name:
(print or type)
Title:
(print or type)
Page 7 of8
20
16' ~ 20 "'U4f
:J
l-
e/)
:EM
1-"'"
...J....
-0
a1z
a::J
~u..
Z
<
>
0 to ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :5 0 0 0 8 ;3j co N 0 8f::
0 ... '" 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" .... 0
0 ..; N ci 0 <Xi 0 0 0 0 ..; 0 ~ g ~ .... <Xi .,; 0 ~I
0 N co .... 0 '" 0 0 0 0 ... 0 18~ 0 0
'" .... N .... to "'- a 0 '" '" N m m <0 to
.,; ci ~ .,; ci .,; ci ci .,.: ~ .,; .... M ci ga
~ N ~ .... .... N N ~ N '"
~ .... ....
M M ...
o
"-
"
(5
E
2
0..
ii'O
.a oii
uo..
<(
acoLOO
I'- en 0 C\I
ommco
NmmL[)
C\tO_N --..,...
~ 0Cl
CDLOlO""
-q-NN""
r---:cx:iM"':
T'""MLOCO
""'''D
ci
-
~t1}f/t(;R-mEA-(Il-EA-EA-_
E rng
<( := 0
gs~~
;:::: "
o ~
>-C!:
LL
'-T il) .q- C,
,--) (D l.D 0
~5;~ ~ 8
,i) ("-J N
l;) ''''
,
;..l" \.1) ,.,
t_ 0
,~~\ ~ ~
'-1"]) C'-.l
Co! ('".j \()
'"
C"
U)(f)<'/)u-)-mU)U-7UjU)~
"-
.,
(I)
.....
C>
C>
N
cD
..
CI)
.c
E
CI)
u
CI)
o
Q) ~.~ c
U! ~ .~ t1J co
a (I)'"::;:::;:
n:E ::;:~~
CD C)Ol!Su~~
i~:EID5~~.c:
Co c: - .- .- 0
'C nJ e a. a.. s
a o..~"UlUl::;:
CDW-;'COOO:J
~ ~~~~.~~
zOO'o 'i:: 'L: a:::
,,-o(J:V-='-~ c:
~(I)Q)E~~1ii ~
c '0 == E oc ;:: ~ ....J C
CD CD 0 0 O..Q 0 a.. to
>UUUiLLLU-U-::;:
.,
o
5.J
0<(
"'l-
ea
o..l-
:>,]i
'13 m :u
'C Gi ~
Out
.!!! OJ Q)
WUlU-
~ ~
'l"""...........m
Q)co......1.ll
lD ~S;:!N
:is-MOlO
.!!J!Oai~cD
"Iii (0 1.0
~....~ ~
co co to 0 '"
co 0 ... .... co
... N '" 0 0
.... N ~ N ...
...- to N. N
~ cD ~
16 'f
A 20
~~~~~~~~~~EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-mEA-EA-EA-EA-.
;::::-
m
..;
'"
0Cl
ci
:::.
rnmr:::-M'mooG'N'
!'"'":c.c:NtOCO..-CO
"ii.a~S;:2ci.~~~
:::s:cN_O_v ......'1"""(0
!jc~So ri~ai
......CDN ..- en--
a..- '-" ('II
)( ~
W~~EA-mEA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-_EA-EA-EA-mEA-EA-EA-mEA-EA-EA-EA-
"''''....
NN'"
aic-i"':
"''''co
",,,,co
c:i
-
<ONCO
tOtON
N"':'"
"'tOm
OClCO<O
~ari......-
~
..
~
II
c:
..
S
'E ~
E
o
OEA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-*WEA-EA-EA-EA-mmEA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-WEA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-_
N to '" 0 0 '" '" M
~ ... m 0 0 .... .... C>
.,; ... 0 0 0 ~ * '"
N '" 0 0 0 to "'
'" to N 0 '" ... N
ci .,.; M ci N N .,i.
N N '"
8 8888
~ gggl
t ~~~I
:s. ~ri. <tt/i
ER-~~tA~ER-ER-tR-fA-ut"
~ Cnt-~a:x~a:
wU~a.<(<.9t-
I- a::~~<(t- z
::;: w-,u::;:::;:oo III
~<(iz81i100~u(ij::l
ggj~~tiiff:ff:~~~i
<(t-wt-wOCOCoOCoo
>cn::2I--..UJWu..WUJ
OWI-(I).-rlLu.. LL .
<( a:: en W Z en (f) ~ en ';!!. ""'.:
o::wwffi~ZZo::ZIO:!;:
::::It->t-wCiiCii<(Cii@D
O~~~O::I-I-Ol-zF
6'
o
~_o
~CDg
i 'C ~
E :::I '"
<(me
6'
o
o
o
o
,..:
to
~
00
00
do
00
OtO
N
~
00000
00000
aaaoo
00000
oaa~a_1O
..oLriaa
~~N
00
00
cia
00
0'"
ciari
to
000
000
acio
000
00'"
N'M
N'"
ER-fA-fA-ER-EA-ER-ER-fI)fI)fI)fhU)
cc~;;t ......~~US <CZ
~~:> lJjOC::;:O ii:iii
ffioc8~ ~d!~~ ~:s
I~~O:: ~~>-w ~o
tiowt->-owOOU wZ
00..21- a::Z a..<C
OOt-<(oQzuw<( <(<.9
wuuuoc<(;;;;;-'z uz
wwcnc::::I-a::......~wJ:cn-
~~~~frl~~~~~~~
Z 0 <l' t- -' <( 00 a. ;;: :> <l' oca.
w~..JOW~~Ul::;:::;:..J
8g8888g888888~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~.i
Mri~ ~~ N ~ ~-~c:; gg.!!,
..... I"'- ,.... ,is
riri it
EA-fR-ER-fhER-ER-EA-ER-ER-ER-ER-ER-ER-tIt
o Wz 8 ocO ~
~~ ~w ~ 0..0 a::
Ui:'5::;:W<.9>-Z !ic~tii<(
i=...Jwa..cn<['::J cncnzU ...
ocw5t.5iz~~ zzooc 8
wu w ::oo<(<(Uo
>00"'<.9::;::> ocOCOCoc"-oo
o~oc~wOOwt-t-www::l
<( WI->...Jt-u.I-I-u..>>rD
-,ocI<(o<(ooUlWWooOCOC-,
<(WI-cta::t:zz<::><::>zww-c
<.9IOCWa.a.CiiCiiooCiiOOOO""
~b~~;;51-1-~ffil-~~g
~NM~~~,....~m~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~gM~~~~~~
16'1 B 1
January 4,2008
-. I I' JL--h../ 1)f'
rlaa ~___
. ,
HalaS_~~--._..
Hennlng._~
Coyle _. -_.__
Coletta. _..~._
MINUTES OF THE HEARING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
Naples, Florida, January 4, 2008
RECEIVED
JAN 1 8 2008
ROd!d of (;ounty Con>mlssioners
LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Special Magistrate, in and
for the County of Collier having conducted business herein, met on this date at
9:00 AM in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F," 3rd floor, of the
Government Complex, Naples, Florida, and the following persons were present:
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE:
Honorable Brenda Garretson
Sue Chapin, Secretary to the Special Magistrate
STAFF PRESENT: Gary Dantini, Code Enforcement Supervisor
Carol Sykora, Code Enforcement Supervisor
Bendisa Marku, Code Enforcement Operations Coordinator
Misc. Corres I G (B I
Date:
Item#:
;::o,ie.s to:
~
1 6 I ... e. tI!If luary 4, 2008
I. CALL TO ORDER
The Meeting was called to order by the Honorable Special Magistrate Brenda Garretson
at 9:00 AM. All those testifying at the proceeding did so under oath.
A. Hearing Rules and Regulations were given by Special Magistrate Garretson. Special
Magistrate Garretson noted that, prior to conducting the Hearing, the Respondents
were given an opportunity to speak with their Investigating Officer for a Resolution
by Stipulation; looking for compliance without being punitive.
RECESS: 9:12 AM
RECONVENED: 9:30 AM
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Bendisa Marku, Code Enforcement Operations Coordinator, proposed the following changes:
(a) Under Item VI(A.), "Motion for Imposition of Fines," Case # 2007030266 - BCC vs.
Ricardo Montpelier Acosta, and Case # 2007030265 - BCC vs. Ricardo Montpelier
Acosta were withdrawn by the County due to foreclosure.
The Special Magistrate approved the Agenda as amended, subject to changes made during
the course of the Hearing at the discretion of the Special Magistrate.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Minutes of the Hearing held on December 7, 2007 were reviewed by the Special
Magistrate and approved as submitted.
IV. MOTIONS
A. Motions for Continuance:
(under "Motion for Imposition of Fines")
5. Case # 2006100283 - Georl!e G. Smith Jr. Tr.. Anita U. Smith Tr.. Smith Trust
UTD 05/09/07
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was not present.
Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Heinz Box was present.
Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Secs. 6, 7 & 8
Accumulation of litter
Violation address: 1120 St. Clair Shores Rd.
The Special Magistrate noted the Respondent had submitted a written Request for a
Continuance which stated he would be out of town at the time of the Hearing.
The Investigator stated the eounty would not oppose the granting of a eontinuance.
The Special Magistrate APPROVED the Respondent's Request for a Continuance.
2
161
B Janlary 4, 2008
(under "Hearings")
16. Case # 2007070244 - BCC vs. Mary Edwards
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was not present.
Collier County eo de Enforcement Investigator Azure Sorrels was present
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sees. 1O.02.06(B)(1)(A), 1O.02.06(B)(I)(E)
and 10.02.06(B)(1)(E)(I)
Building permits
Violation Address: 47 Moon Bay St.
The Special Magistrate noted the Respondent had submitted a written Request for a
Continuance on December 17, 2007 due to hospitalization and medical treatment.
The Investigator stated the County would not oppose the granting of a Continuance.
The Special Magistrate APPROVED the Respondent's Requestfor a Continuance.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Stipulations:
7. Case # 2007040354 - BCC vs. Desi!!ners' Collectables LLC, Kevin G. Coleman, RIA
The Hearing was requested eollier County Code Enforcement Investigator Stephen Athey
who was present.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 10.02.06(B)(I)(A), 10.02.06(B)(1)(E) &
1O.02.06(B)(I)(E)(I); Collier County Land Development Code, Section 22,
Article II, Subsections 104.1.3.5; Florida Building Code 2004 Edition,
Sees. 105.1 & 105.7
Building permits
Violation address: 792 I loth Ave. N.
A Stipulation had been agreed to by Evelyn Waldron as owner and manager of Designers'
Collectables, LLC, on November 14, 2007.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to obtain all required permits and a
Certificate of Completion on or before March 4, 2008, or afine of $1 00. 00 per day will
be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent
Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate.
The Respondent paid the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the
prosecution of this case in the amount of $235. 83.
The Respondent is to notify the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the
violation(s) had been abated.
3
-.---,-.......". ,,~-. ,-~-,.,._--,_.,..,,''''''....._.._-----'''-~.,._-_.~'_.,~'_......-..,',.
16~
B Janu14, 2008
5. Case # 2006120105 - BCC vs. Albert Rex and VIla M. Rex
The Hearing was requested Collier eounty Code Enforcement Investigator Christopher
Ambach who was present.
The Respondents were not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 1O.02.06(B)(I)(A), 1O.02.06(B)(I)(D) &
1O.02.06(B)(1 )(D)(I); Collier County Land Development eode, Section 22,
Article II, Subsections 104.1.3.5 & 106.1.2; Florida Building Code 2004
Edition, Sees. 105.1 & 105.7
Building permits
Violation address: 40 Island Lake Lane
A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondent. Albert Rex, on January 2, 2008, on
behalf of his wife, Ulla M Rex, and himself
The Investigator stated the violation had been abated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did
exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondents were found GUILTY
of the alleged violation(s) and were ordered to pay Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $288. 61 on or before
January 18, 2008.
15. Case # 2007090235 - BCC vs. Mark W. Markisen & Estella Markisen
The Hearing was requested by eollier County Code Enforcement Investigator Azure
Sorrels who was present.
The Respondent, Mark W. Markisen, was present and also represented his wife, Estella
Markisen.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 1O.02.06(B)(I)(A), 1O.02.06(B)(I)(E) &
1O.02.06(B)(I)(E)(I); Florida Building Code 2004 Edition, Sec. 105.1
Building permits
Violation address: III San Salvador St.
A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondent, Mark w: Markisen, on behalf of his
wife, Estella Markisen, and himself
The Investigator stated the violation had been abated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did
exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondents were found GUILTY
of the alleged violation(s) and were ordered to pay Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $224. 81 on or before
February 4, 2008.
4
1(r1
8 Jlary 4, 2008
1. Case # 2007080054 - BCC vs. Jose Luis Jaimes & Martina Jaimes
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Carol
Sykora who was present.
The Respondents were also present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 7
Rental registration
Violation address: 588 Hope Cir.
A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondent.
The Investigator stated the violation had not been abated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondents were found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and were ordered to obtain a Collier County Rental
Registration on or before January 11, 2008, or afine of $25. 00 per day will be imposed
for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation
or Order of the Special Magistrate.
The Respondents were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $231. 50 on or before
February 4, 2008.
The Respondents are to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the
violation(s) had been abated.
4. Case # 2007080854 - BCC vs. Julia E. Perkins & Gabriel Juan Mejia Medina
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Cristina
Perez who was present.
The Respondents were also present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 1O.02.06(B)(I)(A), 1O.02.06(B)(l)(E) &
1O.02.06(B)( I )(E)(I); eollier County Land Development Code, Section 22,
Article II, Subsections 104.1.3.5 & 106.\.2; Florida Building Code 2004
Edition, Sec. 105.1
Unpermitted shed-type structure on estates-zones parcel
Violation address: 3945 2th Ave. NE, Naples, FL 34120
A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondents on January 3. 2008 and January 4,
2008.
The Investigator stated the violation had been abated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did
exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondents were found GUILTY
of the alleged violation(s) and were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by
Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $244. 23 on or
before February 4, 2008.
5
_._-,"-"""',-~...-
161
8 J~ 4, 2008
18. Case # 2007090903 - BCC vs. Robin Okolski
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Azure
Sorrels who was present.
The Respondent was also present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 1O.02.06(B)(l )(A); Florida Building Code
2004 Edition, Secs. 105.l
Building permits
Violation address: 145 Capri Blvd., Naples, FL 34113
A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondent.
The Investigator stated there is a possibility that a permit does exist. She will conduct further
research.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to obtain a Collier County Building
Permit or a Collier County Demolition Permit, all necessary inspections, and a
Certificate of Completion on or before February 15, 2008, or afine of$100.00 per day
will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a
subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $212.44 on or before
March 4, 2008.
The Respondent is to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the
violation(s) had been abated.
The Special Magistrate ruled that, due to the unusual circumstances in this case, the Order
would not take effect until Wednesday, January 9, 2008, to allow the Investigator some
time to research the possibility of an existing permit. The Investigator is to contact the
Special Magistrate's office with the results of her research. lfthe permit does exist, the
case will be dismissed and Operational Costs will not be assessed.
19. Case # 2007100314 - BCC vs. Anthonv Siracusa
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas
Keegan who was present.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 2.01.00(A)
Inoperable/untagged vehicles
Violation address: 1755 Bay St., Naples, FL 34112
A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondent on January 2, 2008.
The Investigator stated the violation had been abated.
6
.---.,.--,,---
16 :1
Q
i,.",i
1
January 4, 2008
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did
exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY of
the alleged violation(~) and was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $222.14 on or before
February 4, 2008.
24. Case # 2007100131 - BCC vs. Ann P. Moore Tr., Ann P. Moore Rev Livin!! Trust
UTD 12/30/03
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas
Keegan who was present.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-4 \ as amended, Sec. 4.05.03(A)
Multiple vehicles parked/stored on unstablilized surface
Violation address: 2837 Van Buren Ave.
A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Katherine Ferrari, the Respondent's daughter, on
behalf of the Respondent. Ms. Ferrari provided a copy of Letters of Plenary Guardianship
of the Person and Property, attesting to her authority to act on behalfofthe Respondent.
The Investigator stated the violation had been abated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did
exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY of
the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of$209.32 on or before
February 4, 2008.
22. Case # 2007080520 - BCC vs. Gale V. McCain Tr.. Gale V. McCain Rev. Trust
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas
Keegan who was present.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-4\ as amended, Sec. 4.05.03(A)
Vehicles parked/stored on grass on residential.zoned property
Violation address: 22 Constitution Dr.
A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondent who signed as Gail McCain-Brooks.
The Investigator stated the violation had been abated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did
exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY of
the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $215. 01 on or before
February 4, 2008.
7
16r
B
l>ow
I
January 4, 2008
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. Motion for Imposition of Fines:
4. Case # 2006110409 - BCC vs. Carmen Vasallo
The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary
Dantini and Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas Keegan;
The Respondent was also present.
Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Carmelo Gomez served as translator.
Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Secs. 6, 7 & 8
Accumulation oflitter
Violation address: 1013 Newmarket Rd. W., Immokalee, FL
The Respondent stated she would accept Investigator Gomez as a translator because she
had no choice since she had been unable to find anyone to translate for her.
Supervisor Dantini stated the County would not oppose the granting of a Continuance.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED a Continuance in this case. The Respondent will be
re-noticed of the new Hearing date in order to obtain a babysitter for her children and a
Translator to bring with her to the new Hearing.
7. Case # 2004090245 - BCC vs. Cvnthia Jean Guv
The County was represented by eollier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini
and Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator John Santafemia.
The Respondent was also present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41, Secs. lO.02.06(B)(1)(A) & lO.02.06(B)(1)(D)(I)
Garage conversion without permit
Violation address: 3037 55th Terr. SW
Supervisor Dantini stated the violations had been abated.
The County requested imposition of the Operational Costs in the amount of$124.18
together with fines in the amount of$9,350.00 for the period from June 2, 2005 through
December 6,2005 (187 days @ $40.00), for a total fine of $9,474.18.
The Respondent stated the garage conversion was pre-existing when she bought the
property. She presented documentation to the Court attesting to the problems with
contractors and delays caused by professional contractors that she hired who did not
complete the work. The documentation was marked as Respondent's Composite Exhibit
"A" and admitted into evidence.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines but,
due to mitigating circumstances, abatement and due diligence by the Respondent, the
Special Magistrate imposed payment only of Operational Costs of $124. 18.
8
...".......""-"~._-........_,--~...,"_."._-~-_."'.'"... -. --
16 ~
B
JJuary 4, 2008
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Stipulations:
20. Case # 2007110041- BCC vs. Jose A. Ortel!a
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas
Keegan who was present.
The Respondent was also present.
VioIation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 2.0I.00(A)
Repeat Violation: Inoperable/untagged vehicle
Violation Address: 3085 Karen Dr., Naples, FL 34112
The Special Magistrate asked if the Respondent understood both English and the
violations against his property. He stated that he did understand.
The Investigator introduced a photograph of the truck whieh was marked as County Exhibit
"A" and admitted into evidence.
The Respondent stated the truck belonged to his tenant. Since the tenant refused to comply,
he asked the tenant to move from the premises.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violationM and was ordered to pay afine in the amount of
$500.00 on or before February 4, 2008.
The Respondent was ordered to affix a valid license plate and repair the vehicle, or to
store the vehicle in a completely enclosed structure, or to remove it from the premises on
or before January 9, 2007 unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the
Special Magistrate.
If the Respondent is unable to comply within this time frame, Code Enforcement may
obtain contractor bid-out and assess the cost for the abatement to the Respondent. If
necessary, assistance may be requestedfrom the Collier County Sheriff's Office.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $206. 11 on or before
February 4, 2008.
The Respondent is to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the
violation(s) had been abated.
The Special Magistrate advised the Respondent if he could not remove the vehicle by
January 9, 2007, the fine of $1 00 per day would be retroactive from November 2, 2007
until the date of actual abatement.
21. Case # 2007110023 - BCC vs. Jose A. Ortel!a
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas
Keegan who was present.
The Respondent was also present.
9
161
B Jlary 4, 2008
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 2.01.00(A)
Repeat Violation: Inoperable/untagged vehicle
Violation Address: 3069 Karen Dr., Naples, FL 34112
The Investigator introduced photographs of the vehicle which were marked as County's
Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence.
The Respondent stated the tenant operated an auto repair business from the property but
that he has stopped.
The Investigator stated the violation had been abated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to pay afine in the amount of
$1,000.00 on or before February 4, 2008.
The Respondent was ordered to pay Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement
during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $206. 11 on or before January 7,2008.
The Respondent requested additional time to pay and the Special Magistrate extended the
deadline to March 4, 2008for Case # 2007110041 and Case # 2007110023.
RECESS: l1:12AM
RECONVENED: 11:35AM
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
B. Hearings:
8. Case # 20071 00 1 02 - BCC vs. Y ulav Exposito & Aide Exposito
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Carmello
Gomez who was present
The Respondent was also present.
Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Secs. 6 & 7
Unlawful to litter, accumulation of litter
Violation address: 5031 32nd Ave. SW
The Respondent stated he was unable to bring a translator with him to the Hearing.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED a Continuance in this case.
14. Case # 2007060699 - BCC vs. Hubert Jean Baptiste
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Jonathan
Musse who was present.
The Respondent was also present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 7(2)1O.02.06(B)(1)(A), 1O.02.06(B)(1)(E)
10
16 r B 1
January 4, 2008
and 1O.02.06(B)(1 )(E)(I)
Fence permits
Violation address: 626 N. 10th St., Immokalee, FL 34142
The Special Magistrate verified that the Respondent did not need the services of a
translator.
The Investigator introduced a copy of Permit #2005012746 (expired) which was marked
as County Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. He also introduced a copy of Permit
#2007081841, dated August 24,2007, which was marked as County Exhibit "B" and
admitted into evidence.
The Respondent stated he had hired a contractor to complete the work but the contractor
did not obtain the Certificate of Completion and did not tell him. The Respondent
introduced a copy of a eollier County Correct Work Order which was marked as
Respondent's Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence.
The Investigator stated the work has been done, but he has not obtained a Certificate of
Completion.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(~) and was ordered to obtain either a Collier County
Building Permit or a Collier County Demolition Permit, all necessary inspections, and
a Certificate of Completion on or before February 4,2008, or afine of$100.00 per day
will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a
subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $234. OJ on or before
February 4, 2008.
The Respondent is to notify the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the
violation(~) had been abated.
13. Case # 2007070119 - Bee vs. Julius Bembrv
The Hearing was requested by eollier County Code Enforcement Investigator Jonathan
Musse who was present.
The Respondent was also present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 2.01.00(A)
Multiple inoperable/untagged vehicles
Violation address: 1009 Ringo Lane, Immokalee, FL 34142
The Investigator stated he spoke with the Respondent's son-in-law in July 2007. The son-
in-law refused to allow him access to take photographs of the property. In November, the
Investigator was still not allowed access although the Respondent's grandson told him the
vehicles had been removed from the property.
The Investigator introduced two photographs which were marked as County's Composite
Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidcnce.
II
;l')'t",>
B
1 January 4,2008
161
The Respondent stated his son-in-law is basically uncooperative with everyone. He works
in ajunk yard and repairs cars at home as a hobby. He stated there are 3 personal cars on
the premises which are operable but he is not sure if the license plates on the vehicles are
current. The Respondent stated he does not reside on the property and has repeatedly
warned his son-in-law about not accumulating vehicles.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation('~ and was ordered to affIX a valid license plate and
repair the vehicle(s), or to store the vehicle(s) in a completely enclosed structure, or to
remove the vehicles from the premises on or before January 9,2007 or afine of $50. 00
per vehicle per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter unless
altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate.
Ifthe Respondent is unable to comply within this time frame, Code Enforcement may
obtain contractor bid-out and assess the cost for the abatement to the Respondent. If
necessary, assistance may be requestedfrom the Collier County Sheriff's Office to
perform a site inspection.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of$227.33 on or before
March 4, 2008.
The Respondent is to notify the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the
violation(~) had been abated.
2. Case # 2006081160 - BCC vs. Noe Garcia and Enedina Lopez
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Michelle
Scavone who was present.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 1O.02.06(B)(1 )(A), I 0.02.06(B)(1 )(D) &
1O.02.06(B)(1)(D)(l) of the Collier County Land Development Code;
Florida Building eode 2004 Edition, Sec. 106.1.2
Building permits
Violation address: 661 3'd St. NW
The Investigator introduced two photographs of the property which were marked as
County's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence.
The Investigator stated both the property and the Courthouse were posted and there was a
return receipt in the tile which had been signed by Enedina Lopez on September 26, 2006.
The Investigator introduced a copy of a fax, dated April 4, 2007, from J.C. Kosinski
Engineering, Inc. containing drawings of the pump house enclosure which was marked as
County's Exhibit "B" and admitted into evidence.
The Investigator stated no permits had been issued for the property.
12
.._,-_._,~-.,._",--,
__~_<~~..~"..__.u".-"~~",,'-".---.,.-----""'---
16 I-B. Jan14,2008
The Investigator introduced photographs of the painted shed and pump house, dated
January 3, 2008, which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "c" and admitted into
evidence.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to obtain either a Collier County
Building Permit or a Collier County Demolition Permit, all necessary inspections and
a Certificate of Completion on or before February 4,2008, or afine of $100. 00 per day
will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a
subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $263.36 on or before
February 4, 2008.
The Respondent is to notify the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the
violation(s) had been abated.
3. Case # 2007100032 - Bee vs. Jason Bottie:lia
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Mario Bono
who was present.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Florida Building Code 2004 Edition, Secs. 424.2.17.1 to 424.2.17.14, and
Article IV, Property Maintenance Code, Sec. 22.228, Paragraph 15 of the
Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances
Unsecured pool screen and pool maintenance
Violation address: 102 eedar erest Ct.
The Investigator stated the owner does not reside in Florida. The owner stated he
purchased the property without inspection as an investment but that it was vacant. The
pool has dirty, stagnant water and is a health issue. The damaged enclosure screens
allowed access into the pool area and is a safety issue.
The Investigator introduced photographs of the property, dated October 1,2007, which
were marked as eounty's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. He also
introduced photographs of the property dated January 3, 2008 which were marked as
County's Composite Exhibit "B" and admitted into evidence.
The Investigator stated the Notice of Violation had been sent to the Respondent via
Certified mail, and the property had been posted.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to immediately secure the upper-
haifofthe pool screen door on or before January 9, 2008 or afine of $250. 00 per day
will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a
subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate.
The Respondent was ordered to clean the pool and provide clean water on or before
January 11, 2008 or afine of $250. 00 per day will be imposedfor each day the violation
remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special
13
...__.~-,.~".,-,.....",._-,,_.~,-,..'"
161
B 1
January 4, 2008
Magistrate.
If the Respondent is unable to comply within this time frame, Code Enforcement may
hire a licensed contractor to abate the violations and the cost will be assessed to the
Respondent.
The Re~pondent was ordered to pay the Operational Cost.. incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $203. 41 on or before
February 4, 2008.
The Respondent is to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the
violation had been abated.
6. Case # 2007090519 - BCC vs. Pedro A. Ibarbia & Isabel R. Ibarbia
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Stephen
Athey who was present.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 2.01.00(B)(3)
Commercial vehicles(s)/equipment in residential districts
Violation address: 696 1041h Ave. N., Naples, FL 34108
The Investigator stated the violation had been abated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did
exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondents were found GUILTY
of the alleged violation(s) and were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by
Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of$219.44 on or
before February 4, 2008.
(NOTE: Investigator stated during the Hearing that the Violation was a "Covered utility
trailer parked and stored in the driveway in front of dwelling. '1
9. Case # 2007090337 - BCC vs. Georl!:e Cirabisi & Vickie Lea Cirabisi
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Glenn Karr
who was present.
The Respondents were not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6, Subsec. 15
Pool maintenance
Violation address: 1935 Empress Ct., Naples, FL 34110
The Investigator stated he had received a complaint about the condition of the pool.
The property was vacant and there was no electricity. The owner stated that he was
filing bankruptcy and was unable to repair the property.
The Investigator introduced a photograph of the property which was marked as County
Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence.
14
...---,,----~~._~-_._--_._-._..~-"_.
161
R 1
January ,2008
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to clean the pool and provide clean
pool water on or before January 9, 2008 or afine of $250. 00 per day will be imposedfor
each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or
Order of the Special Magistrate.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Cost~. incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $244.47 on or before
February 4, 2008.
The Respondent is to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the
violation had been abated.
10. Case # 2007090300 - BCC vs. Kerry Hvppolite
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator John
Santafemia who was present.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6, Subsecs. 121 & 12L
Ord.04-58, Sec. 7, Subsec. 2
Minimum housing
Violation address: 2640 Santa Barbara Blvd., Naples, FL 34116
The Investigator introduced three photographs of the property, dated September 10,2007,
which were marked as eounty's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. The
property and the Courthouse were posted.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to pay for a Collier County Rental
Registration on or before January 11, 2008, or afine of $25. 00 per day will be imposed
for each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation
or Order of the Special Magistrate.
The Respondent was ordered to repair the broken windows, screens, and air conditioning
unit on or before January 11, 2008 or afine of $250. 00 per day will be imposedfor each
day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order
of the Special Magistrate.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $259.74 on or before
February 4, 2008.
The Respondent is to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the
violation had been abated.
11. Case # 2007070801- BCC vs. Mateo F. Avala
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Jonathan
Musse who was present.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sees. 1.04.01,2.02.03 & 2.01.00(B)
Recreational vehicle being utilized for living/sleeping purposes on
15
-"""-"~~~_._.,._,--~,,....,,
<'"
B
1
161
January 4,2008
residential-zoned property
Violation address: 319 N. 6th St., Immokalee, FL 34142
The Investigator introduced 5 pages of photographs which were marked as County
Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. He also introduced a one page
document verifying abatement which was marked as County Exhibit "B" and admitted
into evidence.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did
exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY of
the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $225. 12 on or before
February 4, 2008.
12. Case # 2007070644 - BCC vs. Rodrie:uez Rentals Inc.
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Jonathan
Musse who was present.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04.41 as amended, Sees. 1O.02.06(B)(1)(A), 1O.02.06(B)(1)(E) &
1 0.02.06(B)(1 )(E)(I)
Building permits
Violation address: 1613 Gross Ave., Immokalee, FL 34142
The Investigator stated the violations had been abated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did
exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY of
the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $233. 93 on or before
February 4, 2008.
17. Case # 2007070649 - BCC vs. James M. Poteet
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Azure
Sorrels who was present.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sees. 10.02.06(B)(1)(A), 1O.02.06(B)(l)(E) &
1O.02.06(B)(l)(E)(I), Florida Building eode 2204 Edition, Sec. 105.1
Building permits
Violation address: 71 Isle of St. Thomas
The Investigator stated the County had withdrawn this case.
23. Case # 2007100819 - BCC vs. Jill J. Weaver
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas
Keegan who was present.
16
------,_._---_.,-_."_."'---~
16\
R 1
January 4, 2008
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Secs. 2.01.00(A)
Repeat Violation: Inoperable/untagged vehicles
Violation address: 4620 Acadia Ln.
The Investigator introduced four photographs of the property which were marked as
County's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(~) and was ordered to affIX a valid license plate and
repair the vehicle(s), or to store the vehicle(s) in a completely enclosed structure, or to
remove the vehicles from the premises on or before January 9, 2007 or afine of $1 00. 00
per day will be imposed retroactive from October 24, 2007 until the date of abatement,
unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate.
If the Respondent is unable to comply within this time frame, Code Enforcement may
obtain contractor bid-out and assess the cost for the abatement to the Respondent. If
necessary, assistance may be requestedfrom the Collier County Sheriff's Office to
perform a site inspection.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $206. 99 on or before
March 4, 2008.
The Respondent is to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the
violation(s) had been abated.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. Motion for Impositiott of Fines:
I. Case # 2007060653 - BCC vs. Richard Carter
The eounty was represented by Code Enforcement Supervisor Carol Sykora and
Investigator Reggie Smith.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Collier County Code of Laws & Ordinances, Article VI, Sec. 22-231(5)
Private pool maintenance
Violation address: 196 Briarcliff Ln., Naples, FL 34113
The Investigator introduced the following documents which were marked as eounty
Exhibits and admitted into evidence:
Exhibit "A" - a copy of the proof of delivery on December 21, 2007 from the
US Postal Service website
Exhibit "8" - copy of Affidavit of Posting by Investigator Mario Bono
dated December 18, 2007
Exhibit "c" - photographs of the posting at the property and the Courthouse
Supervisor Sykora stated the violations had not been abated and fines continued to accrue.
17
...~___",~.__"~.,,~.,~_,,,',M~'~'___.~'_'_' .'~...~
161'
B 1
January 4,2008
Supervisor Sykora stated the County was requesting imposition of the Operational Costs in
the amount of$233.62 together with fines in the amount of $17,250.00 for the period from
October 27,2007 through January 3,2008 (69 days @ $250/day), for a total fine of
$17,483.62.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
2. Case # 2005051118 - BCC vs. Jill J. Weaver & Henrv Tesno
The County was represented by Code Enforcement Supervisor Carol Sykora and
Investigator Thomas Keegan.
The Respondents were not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 99-5], Sec. 7
Litter on property
Violation address: 3203 Woodside Ave., Naples, FL 34112
Supervisor Sykora stated the violation had been abated.
The County requested imposition only of Operational eosts of$219.29
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
3. Case # 2006100087 - BCC vs. Jill J. Weaver
The eounty was represented by Code Enforcement Supervisor Carol Sykora and
Investigator Thomas Keegan.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Sec. II, Para. 1
Weed overgrowth
Violation address: 4620 Acadia Ln.
Supervisor Sykora stated the violation had been abated.
The County requested imposition only of Operational Costs of $144.17
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
6. Case # 2006040453 - BCC vs. Russell J. Leehaul! Tr., Leehaul! Familv Tr.
The County was represented by eode Enforcement Supervisor Carol Sykora and
Investigator Heinz Box.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 7(2)
Failure to register rental property
Violation address: 422] Gulfstream Dr., Naples, FL 34112
Supervisor Sykora stated the violation had been abated.
IS
_...,_",..~_..,_,_.,__."~.,.~._~~,_"__,_,."._..,.n~ ,_,__ _,_,.
16
B Janl4, 2008
The County requested imposition only of Operational Costs of $154.54.
The Investigator stated he contacted the Respondent who confirmed that he had
paid the Operational Costs.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
VII. OLD BUSINESS - None
VIII. CONSENT AGENDA - None
IX. REPORTS
The Special Magistrate stated a Public Forum would be held on January 31,2008 at 9:00AM in
the BCC Chambers. The purpose of the Forum is to give the public an opportunity to learn
more about how a case comes before the Special Magistrate and the Hearing process. There will
be mock hearings with public participation invited.
X. NEXT MEETING DATE -January 18, 2008
There being ttO further business for the good of the County, the Hearing was adjourned by
Order of the Special Magistrate at 1:30 PM.
COLLIER COUNTY SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING
These Minutes wep: approved by the Special Magistrate on
as presented v' , or as amended .
tiN 101
I I
19
_,,_..,,_..,w,__--..,__.._,..~......,._._~.,_______~.~_____.._~_'~__...--.,
i1tot;
161
~, 1
1j .,~ January 18,2008
.:'t
MINUTES OF THE HEARING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY ;; f)P
.~ " ,'; SPECIAL MAGISTRATE Fiala ~~ Y,
Halas '
Henning
Coyle _
Coletta
,::.,ll,':I'C;
Naples, Florida, January 18, 2008
LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Special Magistrate, in and
for the County of Collier having conducted business herein, met on this date at
9:00 AM in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F," 3'd floor, of the
Government Complex, Naples, Florida, and the following persons were present:
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE:
Honorable Brenda Garretson
Sue Chapin, Secretary to the
Special Magistrate
STAFF PRESENT:
Gary Dantini, Code Enforcement Supervisor
Bendisa Marku, Code Enforcement Operations Coordinator
Mile. CClIIfI: 1 G I 6 I
Date:
Item':
Copies to:
J
161 B ;1
January 18, 2008
I. CALL TO ORDER
The Meeting was called to order by the Honorable Special Magistrate Brenda Garretson
at 9:00 AM. All those testifying at the proceeding did so under oath.
A. Hearing Rules and Regulations were given by Special Magistrate Garretson. Special
Magistrate Garretson noted that, prior to conducting the Hearing, the Respondents
were given an opportunity to speak with their Investigating Officer for a Resolution
by Stipulation; looking for compliance without being punitive.
RECESS: 9:14 AM
REeONVENED: 9:32 AM
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Bendisa Marku. Code Enforcement Operations Coordinator, proposed the following changes:
(a) Under Item VCR):
. ease # 2007080938 - Charles Haines was removed as a Respondent
. Case # 2007080683 - BCC vs. Janet St. Onge - the Ordinance Sections were
changed to Secs. 1.04.01 and 2.02.03
(b) Under Item VI(A):
. Case # 2007020739 - BCC vs. Jose A. Ortega - The violation address was changed
to 3107 Karen Drive, Naples, FL 34112
(c) The following cases with WITHDRAWN by the County due to payment of fines:
. ease # 2007030778 - BCe vs. Romana Lipkova & Marian Yanko
. Case # 2004050653 - BCC vs. Dana Watson
· Case # 2004090039 - BCC vs. Rosario M. Sosa & Mercedes Sosa
The Special Magistrate approved the Agenda as amended, subject to changes made during
the course of the Hearing at the discretion of the Special Magistrate.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Minutes of the Hearing held on January 4, 2008 were reviewed by the Special
Magistrate and approved as submilled.
IV. MOTIONS
A. Motions for eontinuance: NONE
Sue Chapin, Secretary to the Special Magistrate, stated Stipulations had been reached in the
following cases:
. Agenda # 8 - BCC ys. Tereatha Hawkins Estate
· Agenda # 5 - BCC ys. Janet St.; Onge
. Agenda # 6 - BCe vs. Janet St. Onge
. Agenda # 7 ~ BeC vs. Janet St. Onge
2
16~ I '-1!lfII ~,,'
L: Ji'.nuary 18, 2008
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Stipulations:
8. Case # 2007080437 - BCC vs. Tereatha Hawkins Estate
The Hearing was requested Collier County Code Enforcement Property Maintenance
Specialist Joe Mucha who was present.
The Respondent was represented by Diane Woolfork.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-58 as amended, Sec.6, Subsec.] 21
Minimum housing
Violation address: ]209 N. 19th Terr., Immokalee, FL
A Stipulation had been agreed to by Diane Woo!fork who is the daughter of the Decedent.
Upon questioning by the Special Magistrate, Ms. Woolfork stated Probate proceedings had
not been opened. She also stated the Decedent had other children. The Special Magistrate
stated she would accept the Stipulation contingent upon receiving letters of authorization
Irom Ms. Woolfork's siblings allowing her to represent them as heirs of the Estate.
The Investigator stated the violation had been abated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did
exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY of
the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to pay Operational Costs incurred by Code
EnjfJrcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $250.39 on or before
March 18,2008.
The Special Magistrate ruled that the Order would not be recorded until proof of
authorization had been sabmitted to Code EnjfJrcement. The Investigator was requested
to forward the information to the Office of the Special Magistrate.
5. Case # 2007080683 - BCe vs. Janet St. On!!e
The Hearing was requested Collier County eode Enforcement Property Maintenance
Specialist Joe Mucha who was present.
The Respondent had been present earlier and entered into a Stipulation, but left before the
Hearing could be heard.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Secs. 1.04.01 & 2.02.03
Unlicensed/inoperable vehicles
Violation address: 11399 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34113
A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondent.
The Investigator stated the violations had not been abated.
3
r.",j"
B
lanuary 18,2008
161
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY (~rthe alleged violationM and was ordered to obtain and affix a valid license
plate for each vehicle, or to store the vehicles in a completely enclosed structure, or to
remove them from the premises on 01' before January 23, 2008, 01' a fine of $50. 00 per
day will be imposed for each day the violations remain thereafter unless altered by a
subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $229.2301101' before
Februmy 18, 20(}8.
The Respondent is to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the
violation(s) had been abated.
6. Case # 2007080682 - BCe vs. Janet St. One:e
The Hearing was requested Collier County eode Enforcement Property Maintenance
Specialist Joe Mucha who was present.
The Respondent had been present earlier and entered into a Stipulation, but left before the
Hearing could be heard.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-58 as amended, Sec. 7(2)
Rental registration
Violation address: 11399 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34] 13
A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Re;pondent.
The Investigator stated the violation was abated on January 6, 2008.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did
exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY of
the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to pay Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $227. 68 on or before
February 18, 2008.
7. Case # 2007080700 - BCC vs. Janet St. One:e
The Hearing was requested Collier County Code Enforcement Property Maintenance
Specialist Joe Mucha who was present.
The Respondent had been present earlier and entered into a Stipulation, but left before the
Hearing could be heard.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-58 as amended, Sec. 6, Subsecs. 9, 11, ]28, ]2], 12P, ]9A, 1ge
and 20
Minimum housing
Violation address: 11399 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 341 13
A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondent.
The Investigator stated the violation had not been abated.
4
J ocr,
/~
/
I -...iFlw 1~
"~"(' . ,.
16 ij J n :ry 18, 2008
Finding the Notice of !fiaring had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alle1;f!d violation(s) and was ordered to repair all the Minimum
Housing violationyUsted on the Property Maintenance Inspection Report dated
November 17, j.!#J'TOn or before January 25, 2008, or a fine of $250.00 per day
will be imposed for each day the violations remain thereafter unless altered by a
subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of$227.15 on or
before February 18, 2008.
The Respondent is to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur
the violation(~') had been abated.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
B. Hearings:
4. ease # 2007080938 - BCC vs. Linda Haines & Williams Haines
The Hearing was requested Collier County Code Enforcement Property Maintenance
Specialist Joe Mucha who was present.
The Respondents were also present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6, Subsecs. 12B, 12e & 12/
Property Maintenance
Violation address: 3087 Lunar St." Naples, FL 34112
The Investigator introduced photographs of the property taken August 20, 2007 which were
marked as County's Exhibits 1-9 and admitted into evidence.
The Respondent, Linda Haines, stated she was aware of the condition of the vacant mobile
home but both she and her son, William Haines, had been hospitalized on several occasions
due to severe medical problems. She stated she lives next door to the property and that it is
fenced. She verified that she was divorced from Charles Haines whose name was removed
as a Respondent.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondents were found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and were ordered to obtain a Collier County
Demolition Permit, inspections and a Certificate of Completion on or before May 18,
2008, or afine of $250. 00 per day will be imposedfor each day the violations remain
thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate.
If the Respondents are unable to comply within this timeframe, Code Enforcement may
obtain contractor bid-out and assess the cost for the abatement to the Respondent. If
necessary, assistance may be requestedfrom the Collier County Sheriff's Office.
The Respondents were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $244.99 on or before
May 18, 2008.
The Respondents were ordered to maintain contact with the Investigator and to contact
him on or before March 18, 2008 with a status report.
5
161
B 1
January 18,2008
RECESS: 10:17 AM
RECONVENED: 10:35AM
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. Motion for Imposition of Fines:
8. Case # 2006110511 - BCC vs. Oscar Garateio & Nircia Alvarez Garateio
The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary
Dantini and Collier County eode Enforcement Investigator Michelle Scavone.
The Respondent, Nircia Alvarez Garatejo, was present and also represented her husband,
Oscar Garatejo.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 1.04.0 I (B). 2.02.03 & 2.03.0 I (B)
Tile stored on Estates-zoned areas
Violation address: 3271 22"d Ave. NE
Supervisor Dantini stated the violations had been abated.
The County requested imposition of the Operational eosts in the amount of$276.53,
together with fines in the amount of $1, I 00.00 for the period from October 13, 2007
through October 24,2005 (II days @ $100.00), for a total fine of $1,276.53.
The Respondent stated she had attempted to remove the tile within the time frame as
previously ordered but, due to the weight of the tiles, required a truck which broke
down and delayed completion. She stated the property is now in foreclosure due to
their financial situation and requested a reduction of the fine.
The Investigator stated the Respondent was very cooperative and maintained contact
during the process.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines
hut due to mitigating circumstances, the Special Magistrate reduced the fines to a total
of $476.53, including Operational Co.\.ts.
21. Case # 2004100730 - BeC vs. Alfredo & Miradis MiraIles
The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary
Dantini and Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Heinz Box.
The Respondents were present.
Alex Miralles served as translator for his parents.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sees. 5.06 & 10.02.06(8)
Wall signs without permits
Violation address: 105 I" Street S., lmmokalee, FL 34] 42
The Investigator stated the violations had been abated.
6
J[ 6 , ~anuary~, 20~8
The County requested imposition of the Operational Costs in the amount of $261.53,
together with fines in the amount of $4,850.00 for the period from August 6, 2005 through
October 31,2005 (97 days @ $50.00), for a total fine of $5, 111.53.
The Respondent stated the tenant erected the sign without permission. He stated he felt
it was unfair for him to be responsible for his tenant's violation. He was unaware of his right
to have the tenant evicted.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines
hut due to mitigating circumstances, the Special Magistrate reduced the fines to a total
of $I, 761.53, including Operational Costs.
22. Case # 2007020295 - BCC vs. Miradis Miralles
The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary
Dantini and eollier eounty eode Enforcement Investigator Heinz Box.
The Respondent was present.
Alex Miralles served as translator for his mother.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 7(2)
Failing to register rental property
Violation address: 431 Wells Street, lmmokalee, FL 34142
Supervisor Dantini stated the violations had been abated.
The County requested payment only of Operational Costs of$265.70.
The Respondent stated she did not know she had to register the property but did so as
soon as she was advised of the violation.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
25. Case # 2007050391 - BCC vs. Octavio Carillo and Y oana Carrillo
The County was represented by Collier County eode Enforcement Supervisor Gary
Dantini and eollier eounty Code Enforcement Investigator Jonathan Musse.
The Respondents were present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 Sec. 2.0 I.OO(C)
Commercial vehicles
Violation address: 1209 N. 18th St., Immokalee, FL 34142
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated.
The County requested imposition of the Operational Costs in the amount of$169.38,
together with fines in the amount of $1,500.00 for the period from September 25,2007
through October 10,2007 (15 days@$100.00), for a total fine of$I,659.38.
7
161
n J. .
~I/ '
,. Janu.18, 2008
The Respondent stated the Operational Costs had been paid and produced a copy of a
money order which was marked as Respondent's Exhibit "A" and entered into evidence.
He stated that he is a seasonal worker who is away from his property for long periods of
time. He was unaware of the violations until the mail caught up with him.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines
but due to mitigating circumstances, the Special Magistrate reduced the fine to a total
of $750.00.
26. Case # 2005030605 - BCC vs. Jose A. Orte!!a
The County was represented by eollier eounty Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary
Dantini.
The Respondent was also present.
Violation(s): Ord. 99-51, Secs. 6 & 7
Litter
Violation address: 3107 Karen Drive, Naples, FL 34112
The Special Magistrate asked the Respondent if he required a translator to understand the
proceedings, he declined.
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated by the eounty On December 1.2005.
The County requested imposition of the Operational Costs in the amount of $1 04.42, and
abatement fees in the amount of $300.00, together with fines in the amount of $22,800.00
for the period from June 8, 2005 through November 7,2005 (152 days @ $150.00), for a
total fine of $23,204.42.
The Respondent stated he lives in Fort Myers and his tenant assured him that he would
remove the litter, appear in eourt and pay the fine. The Respondent also stated he was
unable to check on the tenant because of the hours that he works and that he trusted him.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
27. Case # 2005040514 - BCC vs. Jose A. Orte!!a
The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary
Dantini.
The Respondent was also present.
Violatiott(s): Ord. 99-51, Secs. 7
Litter
Violation address: 3069 Karen Drive, Naples, FL 34112
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated by the County.
8
161
B Janul 18. 2008
The eounty requested imposition of the Operational Costs in the amount of$ I 52.13, and
abatement fees in the amount of $200.00, together with fines in the amount of $14,500.00
for the period from July 16,2005 through December 1,2005 (145 days @ $100.00), for a
total fine of$14,852.13.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
28. Case # 2007020741 - BCC vs. Jose A. Ortel!a
The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary
Dantini and Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas Keegan.
The Respondent was also present.
Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Secs. 6, 7 & 8
Accumulation of Litter
Violation address: 3085 Karen Drive, Naples, FL 34112
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated by the County.
The County requested imposition of the Operational Costs in the amount of$ I 20.94, and
abatement fees in the amount of$800.00, together with a civil penalty of$500 for the
repeat violation, and fines in the amount of$15,000.00 for the period from April 28, 2007
through June 27, 200 (60 days @ $250.00), for a total fine of$16,420.94.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
The Special Magistrate asked the Respondent if he had evicted the tenants who caused
the problems. He stated he had not because they were family and had no where else to go.
The Special Magistrate asked the Respondent why he had not paid more attention to this
properties after he received the Notices of Violation. He had no answer. She asked him
ifhe realized that his inattentiveness made him seem as ifhe were an irresponsible owner.
He agreed.
29. Case # 2007020739 - BCC vs. Jose A. Ortel!a
The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary
Dantini and Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas Keegan.
The Respondent was also present.
Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Secs. 6, 7 & 8
Accumulation of Litter
Violation address: 3\ 07 Karen Drive, Naples, FL 34112
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated by the County.
The County requested imposition of the Operational Costs in the amount of$120.94, and
9
r",
JJahu118,i008
abatement fees in the amount of$1 ,360.00, together with a civil penalty of $250.00 for the
repeat violation, and fines in the amount of$ll ,250.00 for the period from April 28, 2007
through June 11,2007 (45 days @ $250.00), for a total fine of $12,980.94.
,;;.. 6" ~] "-
;" f, I
J . ,
,_i!~
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
30. ease # 2005120130 - BCC vs. Jose A. Ortel!a
The County was represented by eollier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary
Dantini and eode Enforcement Investigator Heinz Box.
The Respondent was also present.
Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Secs. 6, 7 & 8
Accumulation of Litter
Violation address: 3107 Karen Drive, Naples, FL 34112
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated by the Respondent.
The County requested imposition of the Operational Costs in the amount of$166.33,
together with fines in the amount of $ I 0,800.00 for the period from February 24, 2007
through June 11,2007 (108 days @ $100.00), for a total fine of $10,966.33.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
The Special Magistrate stated the total fines due for all of the Respondent's cases is
$78,424.76. She stated there were no mitigating circumstances that would allow her to
reduce the fines.
REeESS: 11:55 AM
REeONVENED: 12:17 PM
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
B. Hearings:
1. ease # 2007080213 - BCC vs. Gilda Navarro
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Glenn Karl'
who was present.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Florida Building Code 2007 as amended, Secs. 424.2.17.1 & 424.2.17.1.8
Swimming pool without fencing or enclosure
Violation Address: 9741 Campbell Cir, Naples, FL 34109
The Investigator introduced a photograph of the property which was marked as County
Exhibit "I" and admitted into evidence.
10
16' B
111
-!iuary 18, 2008
The Investigator stated the property was vacant and subject into foreclosure. He stated the
Notice of Violation was personally served on the owner.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to obtain the appropriate Collier
County Permit to construct a permanent fence, impections and a Certification of
Completion on or before February 18, 2008, or afine of $1 00. 00 per day will be imposed
for each day the violations remain unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of
the Special Magistrate.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during tlte prosecution of tit is case in the amount of $252. 25 on or before
February 18, 2008.
The Respondent is to notifY tlte Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the
violation(s) Itad been abated.
2. Case # 2007090460 - BCC vs. Wells Far!!O Bank c/o David J. Stern
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Mario
Bono who was present.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Florida Building eode 2004 as amended, Secs. 424.2.17.1 & 424.2.17.1.14
and Florida Statute Chapter 515 as adopted by Collier County
Pool screen door panel torn and unsecured from pool enclosure frame
Violation Address: 313 Bay Meadows Dr., Naples, FL 34113
The Special Magistrate stated that David J. Stern was an attorney representing the
Respondent and was, therefore, not a party to this action.
The Investigator introduced photographs of the property which were marked as County's
Exhibits "J" and "2,"and were admitted into evidence.
The Investigator stated the violation had been abated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did
exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, tlte Respondent was found GUILTY of
tlte alleged violationM and was ordered to pay Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $222.2 7 on or before
February 18, 2008.
3. ease # 2007060712 - Bee vs. Paul Huttter & Kellv J_ Hunter
The Hearing was requested by eollier County Code Enforcement Investigator John
Marsh who was present
The Respondents were not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Secs. 6 & 7
Litter
Violation address: 3428 Toledo Way
II
", Eb
'I. j"" \
If'", '
1 t"1 Januar I Jz008
The Investigator introduced photographs of the property which were marked as County's
Exhibits "]" and "6,"and were admitted into evidence. He stated the property was vacant,
and subject to foreclosure. The property and the Courthouse had been posted.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondents were found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and were ordered to remove all litter on or before
January 25, 2008, or afine of $1 00. 00 per day will be imposed for each day the violations
remain unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate.
If the Re~pondents are unable to comply within this time frame, Code Enforcement llIay
obtain contractor bid-out and assess the cost for the abatement to the Respondents. If
necessary, assistance may be requestedfrolll the Collier County Sheriff's Office.
The Re~pondents were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code
Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $337.61 on or bej;n'e
February 18, 2008.
The Respondents are to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours 0/ a workday to concur the
violation had been abated.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. Motion for Imposition of Fines:
I. Case # 2007070252 - BCC vs. Humberto L. Jaen
The County was represented by eollier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Oantini
and Code Enforcement Investigator John Santafemia.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6, Subsecs. 1,2,5,6,9, ] 1,121, 12J, 120, 12P, 12R, 15,
19C & 20
Numerous minimum housing violations
Violation address: 824 981h Ave. N., Naples, FL 34 108
The Special Magistrate noted that "Section 6" had been omitted from the Agenda, and
amended it to include the reference to the Ordinance Section.
Supervisor Oantini stated the violations had not been abated and fines continued to accrue.
The eounty requested imposition of the Operational eosts in the amount of$337.08,
together with fines in the amount of $17,500.00 for the period from November 10, 2007
through January 18,2008 (70 days @ $250/day), for a total fine of$ 1 7,837.08.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion/or the Imposition of Fines.
2. Case # 2007050023 - BCC vs. Janet Perlata
The County was represented by eollier eounty Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Oantini
and Code Enforcement Investigator John Santafemia.
The Respondent was not present.
12
1618
(\~'l,
Jan~y 18, 2008
Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6, Subsecs. I, 8, 9, II, 12C, 121, 12N, 120, 12P, 19A,
190, and 20
Numerous minimum housing violations
Violation address: 2365 55'" Terr. SW, Naples, FL 34 108
The Special Magistrate again noted that "Section 6" had been omitted from the Agenda,
and amended it to include the reference to the Ordinance Section.
Supervisor Oantini stated the violations had not been abated and fines continued to accrue.
The County requested imposition of the Operational eosts in the amount of$323.20,
together with fines in the amount of $17,500.00 for the period from November 10, 2007
through January 18,2008 (70 days @ $250/day), for a total fine of$17,823.20.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
3. Case # 2006100196 - BCC vs. Jill J. Weaver
The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Oantini
and Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6, Subsecs. I & 2
Minimum housing
Violation address: 3064 Van Buren Ave., Naples, FL 34112
Supervisor Oantini stated the violation had been abated although the Respondent had not
provided proof of reimbursement to the tenant.
The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of$236.81, together with a civil
fine in the amount of $500.00, for a total fine of $736.81.
The Investigator stated he could not verify that the tenant had been reimbursed since the
tenant had moved. He requested that this requirement be removed from the previous Order
of the Special Magistrate.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines
and approved the request to remove the reimbursement requirement.
4. Case # 2007090022 - BCC vs. Jill J. Weaver
The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Oantini
and Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 2.01.00(A)
Unlicensed/inoperable vehicles
Violation address: 3080 Van Buren Ave., Naples, FL 34112
13
16
Bnuary}, 2008
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated.
The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of $234.] I, together with a civil
fine in the amount of $500.00, for a total fine of $734.11.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
5. Case # 2007080937 - BCC vs. Jill J. Weaver & Henry Testto
The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini
and Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha.
The Respondents were not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-4] as amended, Sec. 2.01.00(A)
Unlicensed/inoperable vehicles
Violation address: 3072 Van Buren Ave., Naples, FL 34112
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated.
The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of$249.56, together with a civil
fine in the amount of $500.00, for a total fine of $749.56.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
6. Case # 2007090202 - BCC vs. Jill J. Weaver
The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini
and Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 2.01.00(A)
Unlicensed/inoperable vehicles
Violation address: 3064 Van Buren Ave., Naples, FL 34112
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated.
The eounty requested imposition of Operational eosts of$229.04, together with a civil
fine in the amount of$500.00, for a total fine of$729.04.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
7. Case # 2007080921 - BCC vs. Jill J. Weaver
The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini
and Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha.
The Respondents were not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6, Subsec. 7, 121, 12L
Repeat Minimum housing violations
14
~-"-~----,~__.,_... n""_'..._.o, ...__.___
16 I JaJBy Ii,}08
Violation address: 3080 Van Buren Ave., Naples, FL 34112
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had not been abated and fines continue to accrue.
The eounty requested imposition of Operational Costs of$247.07, a civil fine in the
amount of $ ] ,000.00, together with fines in the amount of $24, 150.00 for the period from
November] 0,2007 through January 18,2008 (69 days @ $350/day), for a total fine of
$25,397.07.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for tlte Imposition of Fines.
9. Case # 2007060683 - Bce vs. Peter E. Thomas
The eounty was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini
and Code Enforcement Investigator Stephen Athey.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, LDC Sec. 2.01.00(A)
Unlicensed vehicles
Violation address: 74896']' Ave. N., Naples, FL 34108
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated.
The County requested imposition of Operational eosts of $232.12
Tlte Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
10. Case # 2007060682 - BCC vs. Peter E. Thomas
The eounty was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini
and Code Enforcement Investigator Stephen Athey.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Sec. 7
Accumulation of Litter
Violation address: 748 96]h Ave. N.. Naples, FL 34108
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had not been abated and fines continue to accrue.
The eounty requested imposition of Operational eosts of $232. I 2, together with fines in
the amount of $9,800.00 for the period fi'om October 13, 2007 through January 18, 2008
(98 days @ $1 OO/day), for a total fine of $] 0,032.12
Tlte Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
11. Case # 2007070771 - BCC vs. Fernando Rodrif!uez
The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini
and Code Enforcement Investigator Carmelo Gomez.
15
16' B" Inuary 18,2008
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 03-37, Sec(s). 5A, 58 & 5C
Right of Way permits
Violation address: 1737 42"d St. SW, Naples, FL 34116
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had not been abated and fines continue to accrue.
The County requested imposition of Operational eosts of$227.55, together with fines in
the amount of $19,600.00 for the period from October 13,2007 through January 18,2008
(98 days @ $200/day), for a total fine of $19,827.55.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
13. Case # 2007070221 - BCC vs. Saint Juste Florestant & Joan S. Florestattt
The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini
and eode Enforcement Investigator earmelo Gomez.
The Respondents were not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Sec. 6 & 7
Unlawful litter & accumulation of litter
Violation address: 283 I 47th Terr. SW, Naples, FL 34116
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated in November, 2007.
The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of$259.80.
The Investigator stated the property was sold in December, 2007.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
16. Case # 2006010411- BCC vs. Juan Barnhart
The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini
and eode Enforcement Investigator John Santafemia.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6
Tenants in dwelling exceeds allowable number
Violation address: 614 Newmarket Road, Immokalee, FL 34142
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated.
The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of $177 .45.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
16
'fI .9'
; r""",
G' ',;, ,,~_..;
t-"
c~
January 18, ,zOO8
17. Case # 2005020409 - BCC vs. Saint Juste Florestant & Joan S. Florestant
The County was represented by eollier eounty Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini
and Code Enforcement Investigator Carmelo Gomez.
The Respondents were not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 03- I 4, Sec. 5& 7
Residential property without required posted address
Violation address: 2831 47th Terr. SW, Naples, FL 34116
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated.
The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of $85.19, together with a fine of
$25.00, for a total fine of $11 0.19.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines,
18. Case # 2007030755 - BCC vs. Crvstal M. Holler
The County was represented by Collier eounty eode Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini
and Code Enforcement Investigator John Santafemia.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 7(2)
Rental registration
Violation address: 795 94th Ave. N., Naples, FL 34108
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had not been abated and tines continue to accrue.
The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of $255.26, together with fines in
the amount of$3, 150.00 for the period from September 15,2007 through January 18,2008
(126 days @$25/day), for a total fine of$3,405.26.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
19. Case # 2007040275 - BCC vs. Henrv Testto & Jill Weaver
The County was represented by Collier County eode Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini
and eode Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha.
The Respondents were not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6, Subsec(s). 1-5,8-11,120, 12H, 121, 12K, 12L, 120,
12P,19B
Minimum housing
Violation address: 3137 Lunar Street., Naples, FL 34112
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had not been abated.
The Investigator stated there were two separate Hearings on this property: June 15,2007
and July 6, 2007.
17
"-,
~ -r ~l
')1 i J,..~
~ "I
Anuary lli) 2008
....-.
Hearinl! #1 - June 15,2007:
The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of $224.44, a civil fine in the
amount of$250.00, together with fines in the amount of$47,500 for the period from July
13,2007 through January ]8,2008 (190 days@$250/day), for a total fine of $47,994.44
Hearinl! #2 - Julv 6, 2007
The County requested imposition of Operational eosts of$245.21, a civil fine in the
amount of $5,000.00, together with fines in the amount of $96,500 for the period from
July 10,2007 through January 18,2008 (193 days @ $500/day), for a total fine of
$101,745.21.
Total Amount Due: $149,719.65
The Investigator stated the County will abate the violations by demolition of the mobile
Home and the abatement fees will be assessed 10 the Respondents.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines ami
ruled thutfines will continue to accrue until abatement of the violations by the County.
20. Case # 2007070463 - Bee vs. Jill J. Weaver
The County was represented by eollier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini
and Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas Keegan.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Sec. ] I
Weed overgrowth
Violation address: 4620 Acadia Ln., Naples, FL 34112
The Special Magistrate again noted that "Para I" was incorrect, and amended the Agenda to
remove this reference.
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated by the County.
The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of$223.00, abatement costs of
$250.00, a civil fine in the amount of$500.00, together with fines in the amount of
$2,050.00 for the period from September 15,2007 through October 24,2007 (4] days
@ $50/day), for a total fine of$3,023.00.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
23. Case # 2007060378 - BCC vs. Exante Fils-Aime & Noltine Alexandre
The County was represented by Collier County eode Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini
and Code Enforcement Investigator Carmelo Gomez.
The Respondents were not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 7(2)
18
161
8.: 1
January 18,2008
Rental registration
Violation address: 2821 47'h Terr SW., Naples, FL 34116
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had not been abated. '3
The eounty requested imposition of Operational eosts of$m.62, together with fines in
the amount of$3, 150.00 for the period from September 15, 2007 through January 18,2008
(126 days @$25/day), for a total fine of$3,383.62.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
24. ease # 2007060377 - BCC vs. Exante Fils-Aime & NoItine Alexandre
The eounty was represented by Collier eounty eode Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini
and Code Enforcement Investigator earmelo Gomez.
The Respondents were not present.
Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec(s). 2.0 I.OO(A) & 4.05.03(A)
Abandoned/lnoperable/Untagged vehicle
Violation address: 2821 47'h Terr SW., Naples, FL 34116
Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated.
The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of $241.00, together with fines in
the amount of $1,900.00 for the period from August II, 2007 through September 17, 2007
(38 days@$50/day), for a total fine of$2,141.00.
The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines.
VII. OLD BUSINESS - None
VIII. CONSENT AGENDA - None
IX. REPORTS:
The Special Magistrate stated a Public Forum would be held on January 31, 2008 at 9:00AM
in the BCC Chambers. The purpose of the Forum is to give the public an opportunity to learn
more about how cases come before the Special Magistrate and the Hearing process. There will
be mock hearings and the public is invited to participate.
X. NEXT MEETING DATE - February 1, 2008
19
-----..-~----_._-"_..., "
]!~
8anuaryt. 20~8
There being no further business for the good of the County, the Hearing was adjourned by
Order of the Special Magistrate at 1 :55 PM.
COLLIER COUNTY SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING
-~JL ((1)~~
......-; --
.special Magistrate, Brenda Garretson
These Minutes were approved by the Special Magistrate on
as presented , or as amended 7.
~.
J-9v~
20
16$}' -Bt;;.~
p
. '
-",
~\\ J.["~
..LI
'\_1\ ~y tt.
Fiala ..'
Halas L/ ,'!::;.tl,
Hennlng~-
Coyle ~ -
Coletta ----
LET IT BE NOWN, that the Clam Bay Committee of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board met in
~-:':O;.~i-; "
CLAM BAY COMMITTEE
MINUTES - December 19, 2007
Naples, Florida
"CO',
Regular Session on this date, December 19, 2007 at 10:00 A.M. at The Hammock Oak Center, 8962 Hammock
Oak Drive, Naples, Florida 34108 with the following members present:
Mr. John Domenie, Chairman
Ms. Annette Alvarez (Absent)
Mr. James Burke
Dr. Ted Raia (Absent)
Mrs. Mary Anne Womble
ALSO PRESENT: One (1) member of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board; Mr. Gary McAlpin, Collier County
Coastal Zone Management; Ms. Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Collier C09unty Attorney's Office; Mr. Tim Hall, Turrell, Hall
Associates, Inc.; Mr. Jim Hoppensteadt, President, Pelican Bay Foundation; Ms. Janice Lamed, District Offices,
LLC.; Mr. John Petty, Division Administrator, Pelican Bay Services Division; Mr. Kyle Lukasz, Field Operations
Manager, Pelican Bay Services Division and Mrs. Barbara Smith, Recording Secretary
AGENDA
1. Roll Call
2. Approval of Minutes of the November 21,2007 Meeting
3. Audience Participation
4. Review of Clam Bay Annual Report
5. PBS&J Report
a. Analyze "Conclusions" - Pages 37/38
b. Consider "Recommendations" - Pages 38/39
5. Update on "Renewal Application or "Extension" of Management
Plan
6. Status of additional Osprey Nest
7. Audience Comments
8. Adjourn
ROLL CALL
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: We shall get started with the roll call. Mary Anne.
MS. WOMBLE: Here
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Jim.
Misc. Corres I (p I B 2-
MR. BURKE: Here.
Date:
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: John Domenie. Here.
Item#:
565
Copies to'
v
C;::lam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
16/ 8
("'"1,.
"
!:..,.,
Ted Raia I understand is out of town. And we haven't heard anything from Annette, have we?
MS. SMITH: She did call and her employer is in town today and she will not be available.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Pardon me?
MS. SMITH: Her employer, Mr. Forbes, is in town.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 21. 2007 MEETING
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: The first item is the approval of the minutes of November 21st, and I have some
comments to make.
Barbara Smith always does such a great job on our minutes so that ifs difficult for someone else to step in
and take over temporarily. I would, however, like to commend Elizabeth Brooks of the Gregory Court Reporting
Service for her minutes. It must be difficult to hear new names, abbreviations and listen to the off-the-cuff comments.
I do have some corrections.
In first place, Mr. Petty, is it required to mention what staff members were also present? The minutes merely
reflect the four members of the committee that were here.
MR. PETIY: Mr Chairman, it's not required, but it is good housekeeping though.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay. So let it reflect that Mr. John Petty and Mrs. Barbara Smith and _.
MR. PETIY: Also, Mr. Kyle Lukasz was also present.
Then on page 544, the middle of the page there is talk about fertilizer. And that I think should be 8-0-15
instead of what is written. And a little bit further down is that 8T12 correct, 8T, capital T?
MR. PETIY: No. It should be 8-2-12.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: 8-2-12. Thank you.
Then on page 547, that should read Turrell, T-u-r-r-e-I-l, not Terrell. Then I believe on pages 549, 550 and
551 where we have Mr. Bradinson, I think all those references are to Tom Cravens, C-r-a-v-e-n-s. Somebody may
want to check up on that.
MR. BURKE: I had a question also to Alberto Chavez.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Yes, what page?
MR. BURKE: I'm sorry. The same page 550. He's Rookery Bay; is that right?
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: That's correct. Alberto Chavez is Rookery Bay.
566
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
161
8
,~
c.
On page 551 Bob Naegele, N-a-e-g-e-I-e. And on page 555 I think that's a natural misunderstanding when
we're talking about the sandbar. In this case we were talking about the Sandbar Restaurant with a capital S,
Sandbar.
On page 560 there are two references to Mr. Coleman. Mr. Coleman is present, but I believe that those
should be Mr. Bauer, B-a-u-e-r.
MR. CONNELL: If I could correct that. It's Mr. Connell, not Mr. Coleman.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Oh, is it?
MR. CONNELL: Coleman is my first name.
CHAIRMAN DOMEN1E: I'm sorry. It says Coleman in the minutes. That's why I -- okay. But you didn't say
anything I don't think.
MR. CONNELL: I don't recall. I don't believe I used my name.
MS. WOMBLE: This is about -- Coleman, irs about apple snails. I don't think this was you.
MR. BURKE: He's an old apple snail guy.
MS. WOMBLE: But you're -- infamously it can go either way, Coleman or Connell.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: You're correct. It shouldn't be incorrect, Mr. Connell, but correct is Mr. Bauer.
Thank you.
And at the bottom of page 561 when I'm talking, I'm talking about the Inn at Pelican Bay not just Pelican Bay.
And the other area is the Breakwater not the Greatwater.
And 562 although "pest" with a "P" management is desirable, I believe we were talking about "best" with a
"B", best management practices.
And page 562 no doubt my poor enunciation caused a problem. It's capital PBS&J. But I think under the
circumstances I feel these are very, very good minutes and I thank you very much for your work. And does anybody
else have any other corrections?
MR. BURKE: John, in the depth of your input on the minutes, does it have anything to do with the big print?
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I can read it.
MR. BURKE: I found the same thing. Very good, yeah.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: You have anything? Anybody else?
567
1:1am Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
161
~
.8,
~~\
.d'
t-.
MS. WOMBLE: No.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Do we have a motion?
Mr. Burke moved, seconded by Mrs. Womble and unanimously approved the
Minutes of the November 21, 2007 Meeting subject to the above referenced
changes.
-~~--~-~--
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Now we go to audience participation. Do we have anybody from the audience?
Please step up to the mic and identify yourself.
MR. FINLAY: Yeah. Doug Finlay. And I live in the City of Naples. And I believe at the last Clam Bay
meeting a question was asked as to what fertilizer the city was using, specifically mainly directed towards phosphates.
And I do have that answer for you. I thought you might be interested in knowing.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Yes, please.
MR. FINLAY: I know Joe Pistaglia (phonetic) who's in charge of these things in the city, so I sent him an
e-mail and he wrote back and I'll just kind of quote from -- from his e-mail.
(As read): Doug, last year and the previous years we used the following blends of fertilizers: Sod, 15-1-15 _
so that's 1 percent phosphorus -- ornamentals, 8-4-10; trees and palms, 8-4-10. This year we will be using the
fOllowing fertilizer blends: Sod, 15-0-15 - so going to no phosphates on the sod - omamentals, 8-2-12, dropping from
four; and trees and palms stay at 8-4-10. And then because we do have athletic fields, they use 0-0-50 and 0-0-20.
For the dry season they utilize 18-0-18.
So anyway that helped them figure and answer. Also the city is currently working on a fertilizer ordinance as
we speak. We discussed it with council yesterday and it passed our committee, the CSAB last week. The
Conservancy had some input, but they wanted a little bit more defined ordinance. So I believe we may be talking to
Mike Bauer on that anyway. The City's looking at essentially a mandatory no phosphorus, slow release nitro
ordinance that will be extended from not this -- what I just told you about is what the City puts on its own property but
on the private property.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Very good. That sounds great. Mike, you have anything that you would like to add
to that?
568
~Iam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
16/
B
~
C
MR. BAUER: Mike Bauer, Natural Resources Manager, City of Naples. I think Doug covered it all. We're
looking at no phosphorus where phosphorus was not needed because our systems don't require phosphorus. Slow
release nitrogen to get the mechanism releases. And organic fertilizer, we're recommending that process. And, of
course, we're doing that, putting it into an ordinance and we're putting our landscape certification program into an
ordinance that was established by resolution. Now we're putting it into an ordinance with penalties that are involved
with fines if people do not comply. So we're putting some teeth into it.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Has that passed?
MR. BAUER: No.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: - being -- that's January?
MR. BAUER: January 9th will be the first reading before city council, with the second reading at the next city
council meeting to give the public time to come and talk about it.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: To what extent under the present conditions has there been use, shall we say,
people complied with the people, the landscapers?
MR. BAUER: We've had a fantastic response. We had over 400 people go through the education program.
And we now have over 70 companies that are certified by the city. And they have a little sticker on their trucks so we'll
know they're certified. And so it's been a great success even without any teeth.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Well, congratulations. I think that's great, something for us to discuss.
MR. BAUER: Great.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Incidentally on a separate note, I would like to say that the Mangrove Action Group
is having its annual meeting on Saturday, January 26th, here at the community center at two o'clock. The Mangrove
Action Group is of great assistance to us, encouraging best management practices and has invited Cathleen Fester,
Urban Horticultural Agent and Master Gardener Advisor as their guest speaker. Please show your support by coming
to this meeting and encouraging your friends and neighbors to come also.
And this afternoon at two o'clock there is a meeting of the President's Council. I understand that Mr. Mike
Bauer is going to be one of the speakers?
MR. BAUER: I hadn't heard that. I've got to be at city council at 1 :30 so that's going to be tough.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I was told that you were going to be one of the speakers today as was Cathleen
569
1:1am Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
161 B
'"
'/
,
~_4
Fester and a third person
MR. BAUER: Okay.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: That was according to Tom Cravens when I saw him yesterday.
MR. BURKE: Who is Cathleen Fester?
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: She is an urban horticulture agent
MR. BAUER: She does the Florida Yards & Neighborhoods Program.
MR. BURKE: They had a President's Council meeting last Thursday.
THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sony. I can't hear you.
MR. BURKE: I'm sorry. There was a President's Meeting last Thursday at two o'clock. So maybe Tom
Cravens has got his times confused.
CHAIRMAN DOMEN1E: Okay.
MR. BAUER: He was talking to me about January 9th and something going on.
MR. BURKE: Yeah
MR. BAUER: I mean, according to that, but I don't know about this aftemoon.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Well, perhaps he misspoke yesterday. Thanks. Thank you very much, Mike.
Anybody else have anything?
(No response.)
REVIEW OF CLAM BAY ANNUAL REPORT
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Let's go on then to the next item, review of Clam Bay annual report.
MR. HALL: Hi. Tim Hall with Turrell, Hall & Associates. I just wanted to provide you an update on the status
of the Annual Report. I'll have it ready for the January meeting.
I brought some of the water quality graphs. I know that's been kind of the main issue with Dr Tomasko's
report and the discussions of the last few meetings. I thought I could provide you a preview of the nitrogen
phosphorus levels and what we saw this year
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay.
In the first place, Tim, thank you very much for this. Will the report itself be this size or is it going to be the
small one again where you can't tell one color from the other?
570
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
161 B j~
MR. HALL: No, I'm going to put a full page graph in the report. Okay. If you use the CD and bring it up on
the computer screen it will be actually even clearer.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay.
M R. HALL:
What I included here was the nitrate and ortha-phosphorus levels that we had been
monitoring. And the average monthly as it has every year, bounces all over the place especially with the phosphorus.
The nitrate levels are pretty low in all of the Class II waters, all of the bay waters. You'll see where the big swings are
in our Class III, the St. Lucia and the Pelican Bay 13 which is up towards the north end of the system where the
highest levels of nitrates were recorded. But if you go to the last two sheets the average annual and especially for the
phosphorus level, you'll see this year was kind of a downswing. Almost all of the stations had lower average
phosphorus levels than they had last year.
I know of particular interest to Mr. Domenie was that Upper Clam Bay Creek is in pretty significant decline
this year. I don't know if thars a result of less going into the system or more a result of the fact that we are in a
drought year and have had less rainfall to actually move material into it. Again, it's just something that we're going to
have to keep an eye on. So we'll have to look to see what happens in the next couple of years whether those
numbers jump back up again or not.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Now, where exactly is St. Lucia? It is not behind St. Lucia, is it, Kyle?
MR. LUKASZ: It's close to that area, yes. St. Lucia is the one just north of the Commons.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Right. Irs north of the Commons.
MR. LUKASZ: Yes.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Because there's very little water there. You're taking it east or west of the berm?
MR. LUKASZ: West by that cut and by the weir structure.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Where the culvert is?
MR. LUKASZ: Right, where the culvert is.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Well, doesn't that get influenced a lot by the culvert, because there's a canal there.
MR. LUKASZ: Right, because you've got the weir structure coming across.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Right. Shouldn't you actually be taking that east?
MR. LUKASZ: That's where I've been.
571
"""
16 "'
B.="
.;.('.;)1 J:
. ,.~~ ,>'
I;....
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
MR. HALL: They normally pull it in the water that's coming out.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Oh, okay, as long as they take it there Can you imagine why that area has such a
high phosphate reading?
MR. HALL: Well, I believe that's one of the main outfalls of System 3. And that's the biggest aerial water
management system we have. So that's the one with of the outfalls going in.
MR. PETTY: Let me ask you to define for the Board the nitrogen cycles so they understand the difference
and the evolution of nitrogen and water between ammonia and nitrates.
MR. HALL: Correct.
MR. PETTY: So when you see these spikes in one particular nitrate level, you're looking at really a stage of
the nitrogen. If you could walk them through that, Tim, I'd appreciate it.
MR. HALL: Okay. Basically the nitrogen, as John said, is split into or contained in the system in three
different compounds: nitrates, nitrites, ammonia. And, I mean, I'm not a water quality scientist so most of what I get
I'm trying to remember is from my biology class.
MR. PETTY: Sorry.
MR. HALL: No, that's okay.
MR. PETTY: I didn't mean to stick you with that.
MR. HALL: That's fine. I can definitely with a little more research probably answer that question better.
MR. PETTY: I only know it from the utility business
MR. HALL: Okay.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: So what are we saying?
MR. PETTY: You're trying to measure nitrogen. And nitrogen changes according to the biological activity.
And we're trying to wait for it to get to its most stable form. When you see these spikes, you're not really seeing so
much as new pollution, as you're looking at a possible change of retention. This water may be at the very end of the
system. And the reason we measure it on one side of the berm and not the other is that's the very last bit of
treatment that can happen. Impact is on the other side of the berm.
CHAIRMAN DOMEN1E: Right.
MR. PETTY: So by then we want any nitrogen to be as stable as possible by the biology available in the lake
572
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
16' I 8
,.."
~
and our uptake by any plant material and the like.
So if you see the nitrogen in a young phase of treatment, well, now you're looking for a hydraulic problem
because you haven't retained it in your system. And that gives us an indication that possibly the nitrogen that is
causing this spike came from nearby if there isn't a hydraulic problem. So they're all just indicators when you're
looking at the nitrogen cycle. I think as he said at the end, is the phosphorus levels are on decline this year overall in
our system.
MR. HALL: Yes.
MR. PETTY: Although we see a spike in the May-June time frame at that St. Lucia location. I think overall
for the year, though, we are down; right?
MR. HALL: Yes. Overall for the year we're down in both of those. And the reason we measure - we actually
measure in our water quality we have all of the nitrogen components. We have readings for nitrates, nitrites and
ammonia as well as fertile nitrogen. We also have the ortha-phosphates and total phosphorus. The reason we're
recording those is they've been most closely linked with the algal blooms and algal spikes. That's why we include
these in the report, as well as the chlorophyll levels that we started to see. If we see spikes in one or two of these,
then we look to see if we see corresponding spikes in the chlorophyll or the algae levels within the system and then
kind of link those together.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: So we will have the full report by the next meeting?
MR. HALL: Actually the full report will be to you right after the first of the year. I'm trying to give everybody
between one and a half and two weeks to review it before the full board meeting.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Very good. Thank you very much.
MR. BURKE: So the spike on the graph doesn't necessarily mean there's a pollution problem at that
location?
MR. HALL: Correct, yes. If it wasn't just a spike but if it was a rise and then a sustained high level across
time that would be much more of an indicator that there's a problem. The fact that it's going up and down means that
those natural processes are working or that the actual delivery to that point is intermittent. It's not a constant supply.
The other thing that I wanted to mention was the sea grass, which was one of the other issues. We found
this year that we actually have more aerial coverage of sea grass than we had last year though the density from
573
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
,.,. B
1 ~? 1'H~
where we had sea grass was a little bit lower. So last year we had smaller areas that were denser, whereas, this year
we have larger areas that are a little more spread out.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Now, how did you do it, linear or random?
MR. HALL: If I could comment on that. One of the questions that we had been asked was how many acres
of sea grasses are in Clam Bay. That was never what the monitoring program that was set up for them was designed
to answer.
The permit which allowed the dredging when the original resource surveys were done prior to that located
sea grass beds that were either in the pathway of or very close to the dredging footprint. So when the permit was
issued, they asked us to set up transects, or the permit required transects to be set up to monitor those specific grass
beds to see how they reacted to the dredging. It wasn't a system-wide survey. It was just to monitor specific areas
that were identified at the time of the permit. So that's what our transect system was designed to do.
When Dr. Tomasko did his sea grass thing, his methodology was to use a random point generator and look
at different points within the system which also doesn't give you an acreage cover. It establishes a baseline and a
means to look at changes or patterns that may develop over time. If you keep doing that same type of system, then it
will give you general coverage of sea grass but not any specific increase survey.
In order to actually determine your acreage, you have to do a very systematic transect survey. I think the
best way is where you essentially swim every square inch of the bay and say here's where the grasses are. We
actually did that this year to try to answer that question. We did find additional sea grass beds that we had not
mapped before. We found a lot of Caleurpa which is an algae, macrophitic algae that looks similar to a couple of
different sea grasses but it's an algae, not a true grass.
The other thing that we found this year that we had not found in the past was a very substantial clam
population. It looks like clams are starting to come back into the bay. There were several beds of them that we found
throughout there.
MR. BURKE: Mr. Chairman, I'm looking for the first permit for harvesting if thafs possible.
MR. HALL: The other thing that you'll probably see when our report comes out is that Dr. Tomasko did his
sea grass survey and the work that they did in May early in the year. They found Halophila, which is a little kind of
two-leaved sea grass. When we did our survey it was in late July. We did not find any Halophila. We found all
574
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
161 B
2.
Halodule which actually looks like grass. We also found three different locations of Thallassia which is the manatee
grass, the big thick-leaved grass. In one spot it was only five or six sprigs. In another one it was about a dozen. And
in the third location it was four sprigs of it, but that is more than we have found in past years. So we're pretty happy
that it looks like the extent of the sea grass areas have expanded this year. Again, that could be a result of the rainfall
and less water coming into the bay which allows more to spread out and get established.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: You mean less fresh water and more sea water?
MR HALL: Less fresh water, less fresh water inputs. I believe that was actually something that happened
county wide. With my conversations with the Conservancy and with Rookery Bay, I think a lot of the sea grass
surveys that were conducted this year have found more grasses than they had in the past.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Thank you very much.
MR HALL: Okay.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Any questions?
MR HALL: I guess I should mention the mangroves. They're still doing really well.
MR BURKE: Are there any die-off areas right now, new ones?
MR HALL: Nothing new. There's a couple of lightning-strike areas. And the last die-off area which was the
one around the county boardwalk and a little more in the southern end of the system which was part of the old
channel or canals that were closed off with Hurricane Charley. This is the third year now. Most of that stuff I think
has died or what is going to die has died. We're starting to see some regrowth and some sprouts coming back.
There will probably be a couple more years before we see any major difference in that area.
MR PETTY: If I could, Mr. Chairman, ask a question. I'm going to try and summarize actually.
What we've seen over the last eight years in bringing the mangroves back leads us to believe that attention
by the residents or by this group in keeping the mangroves healthy is something that would be necessary each and
every year into the future
MR HALL: Yes. My opinion for sure is that the maintenance of the system and the work we've done is going
to be a critical component of making sure that the system is able to recover and sustain itself. That is definitely one
thing that we saw when we had the hurricanes and the storm surges associated with them. While they weren't
extreme, there was a surge there. And the mangrove areas all drained and recovered very, very quickly which
575
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
161 -r'B' I~ "}
C
prevented any more additional die-offs to occur.
MR. PETTY: We've had to go back in and we do maintain these handcut channels should they get blocked.
And if the pass gets blocked, that's part of our permit is to keep clear of that. I guess to summarize and make sure we
all understand, it's a very delicate balance in our bay system. And that the difference of a couple of inches of water
elevation means the difference between a healthy system and a stressed system.
MR. HALL: Absolutely, yes. The water level is critical to maintaining IT. That is part of the monitoring every
year. We're not just looking at whether the mangroves are healthy, but we also look at all of those flushing cuts and to
make sure that they're not blocked and are still flowing and working like they are designed.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Well, to me the most amazing thing is when you walk along the berm and those
seven canals that you dug leading into the berm to bring more salinity they brought so many seeds. And that whole
area is just teeming with new 3-foot high mangroves and behind them are mangroves of 5 feet, 7 feet and 9 feet from
the different years that I guess seeds came in. It's really fantastic. I can't believe how much those have grown.
MR. HALL: I think that and the fact that the cattail growth has been curtailed quite a bit. Both of those are
direct byproducts of that additional salt water.
MR. BURKE: That's fine. Thanks.
MS. WOMBLE: I saw that firsthand yesterday thanks to Mr. lukasz. So, absolutely ifs so much better than it
was even five years ago. Doing great.
CHAIRMAN DOMEN1E: Mr. lukasz, will you be deepening some of those canals that lead to the berm?
don't know. It looks like one or two of them may have filled up a little bit.
MR. lUKASZ: Well, we go through and check them.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: When do you do most of that work, in the dry season or the wet season?
MR. LUKASZ: Usually March, April.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: The dry season. Okay. Thank you. Thank you very much, Tim. We look forward
to the full report.
PBS&J REPORT
ANAL VZE "CONCLUSIONS' PAGES 37/38
MR. DOMEN1E: The next item on the agenda is the PBS&J report and analyzing the conclusions on pages
37 and 38. I will give my comments on that and then ask everybody else to join in also.
576
Glam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
~ ~ T""8/1l11 ~
J!. r_~" 0 t!..
In reading the conclusions of the PBS&J report, please bear in mind that the first three referred to what the
author refers to as the total Clam Bay watershed. All other references should read Outer Clam Bay only. The fact
that it is a high salinity environment indicates there is great flushing. Then the author goes on to state (as read):
Analysis of long-term data sets, 1981 through 1998, suggest that salinities decreased over that time period. Well,
that of course is obvious since that was also the time that Clam Pass closed at various times and before the major
dredging that took place in 1998. And I find it very strange that in all the author's work the time period 1998 to 2006
was omitted. If you recall the major dredging took place at that time and greatly increased salinity in the estuary.
And then finally on page 38 (as read): A significant quantity of nitrogen, phosphorus and suspended solids
appear to be coming from areas south of Seagate Drive. As these sub-basins have highly urbanized landscapes with
little evidence of stormwater best management practices, actions that would increase the influence of these areas on
water quality in Outer Clam Bay should be appropriately considered. Within the more immediate watershed of Outer
Clam Bay, the stormwater treatment best management practices in place of the Pelican Bay sub-basin appear to
result in significant reductions in loads of nitrogen, phosphorus and suspended solids.
And then on page 37 the overall conclusion (as read): Combined these results lead to the conclusion that
Outer Clam Bay does not appear to be a seriously distressed system. I just feel that should be part of our record. I
know ifs in the report, but I feel that that should be part of our records.
I don't know if anybody else wants to add anything to the conclusions.
MR. BURKE: The conclusions of the report?
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Conclusions of the report, not the recommendations yet.
MR. BURKE: Did you read conclusion and action plan?
CHAIRMAN DOMEN1E: Yes
MR. BURKE: Okay.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: The first part first part is the conclusion and then it goes into the action.
MR. BURKE: Okay.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I have not touched on the action yet.
MR. BURKE: Okay. Then perhaps I just make some comments. I mean, there is no doubt that, Mr.
Domenie, you and I have done seven years on this committee and there's no doubt we could have been defined as
577
16/
;)
.",',
/:}
{.
c:...
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
mangrove fanatics. I mean, that was the thrust of everything. I will say in past years, Mr. Domenie, you used to bring
up water testing quite a bit, but there's no doubt that a great job has been done with the mangroves. They're healthy.
The system is sound. To me what the Tomasko report has done is point out the need to keep a closer eye on the
water quality. I mean, if I read through all of it, it's a lot about water. I think I'm about right there, aren't I?
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I would agree that it is all about water. I mean, he doesn't touch on the mangroves
at all. Because I guess it was about sea grasses and how they're affected by the water quality. I guess that's what
the aim of the study was.
MR. BURKE: So I guess what my thoughts are, this Tomasko report and our management plan perhaps, is
the impetus we need to maybe not turn this into water fanatics, but to start working at water about as thoroughly as
we did the mangroves. That is my thinking on it. And I'm hoping that we use the conclusions and the
recommendations in a constructive manner when we incorporate them into the plan which I'm sure we will. So that's
about what I have.
CHAIRMAN DaM EN IE: Mary Anne.
MS. WOMBLE: Well, from attending the meeting where Mr. Tomasko gave his presentation and from
listening to he and Mr. Gary McAlpin, who happens to be here, it becomes rather clear to me that absolutely water is
the big issue. And at this point the water south of us is far more important.
(Phone ringing.)
MS. WOMBLE: I'm sorry. I have a new phone and I don't know how to turn it off. And I'd also think it's Mr.
Bob Bittner.
But from those comments that I'm re-reading here that I took from that, it occurs to me that we're all really
concerned about the water issue in all of Clam Bay. And south of us seems to really be needing help. And I think that
the, pardon the expression, grass-roots effort at this point is really important from everything I'm learning which is
enormous from what I used to know from just a couple of years ago. I think that Mr. Tomasko's report was right on. I
think Mr. McAlpin's got the idea and he's going forward for the southem end of Clam Bay. It's really important to get
that up on target. I think that maybe it was a good thing that you were mangrove fanatics.
MR. BURKE: Yes. Yes.
MS. WOMBLE: Because it may have turned out for everyone's best interest, city, county and all the
578
~Iam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
16'~r ~ 8~'" './
e:,.
residents and all of the tourists that come in and enjoy our area and our environment.
I have to say' really am thrilled that Pelican Bay, Westinghouse, and WC' have considered and been very
environmentally concerned enough to keep the mangroves which did not happen all the way south. I'm sorry, it didn't
-- there goes that phone again. But I appreciate all the efforts that are going on and I'm really thrilled to see it all
happening.
So thank all of you who are in this room from whatever area you're involved in. I know you're involved and
you're really trying your best in whatever area you can. And I do thank all of you because this is an important issue
and it's becoming more and more important as fertilizer is fi~ering into our systems from everywhere north of us, west
of us, east of us. I'm figuring we'll get Europe sooner or later from the way things are going. So thank you.
MR. BURKE: Mr. Chairman, one other comment comes to mind and Mrs. Womble caused me to think about
it. When all of our emphasis was on the mangroves, we could be self-contained. I mean, it was us. It was our
mangroves. We could get our arms around it.
But in reading all this material and talking to people about the water, I think that's a broader issue in getting at
it. And I don't think we can just be Pelican Bay because we obviously share the system with the City of Naples. We
share it with other communities. So I think as we move into the future with our stewardship of the water, we're going
to have to look at it in a bigger picture manner. For me this report has helped with that and also some of the other
people that were brought into it with us. I'm looking forward to it.
CONSIDER "RECOMMENDATIONS" - PAGES 38/39
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Do you or, Mrs. Womble want to comment on the recommendations that are made
in there? I have various, but I would like to hear from you two before I say something.
MR. BURKE: Can' mention something about water? Have we already increased or added to our water
testing points? Did I hear the number 16, that there are 16 additional sites?
MR. PETTY: Mr. Chairman, if I could. What has come before the committee before and what they have
opined on, we haven't yet passed it on the budget yet, is that we would reinstate the upstream water quality tests that
we used to take in the old days. We used to take them at the head of the water at the first lake next to Tamiami Trail
and then you take them midway in the system and then right at the berm. And of course you would take it in the bay
system as well to find out what background is to see what your impacts were. It was felt that way if a problem existed
579
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
1 i'!l:J" B ..
.
~
by having at the head works and in the middle you would be able to isolate the cause quicker.
After about ten years of doing that, we found that there was no concem of levels here and it was deleted for
cost savings. Since the issue of water quality has come up, we find ourselves in the position where we are looking to
adopt a little bit of a defensive posture and in an abundance of caution, lers go back to doing it. Even though we don't
have an indication of a problem, let's go back to doing it because there is such a high level of concern of
contaminants being dropped in a specific one-time event that this could give us good evidence. So the cost isn't that
great. And we should be able to bear it. So staff recommended doing it and I believe this body voted to do it as well.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: And all of those locations are east of the berm ?
MR. PETTY: Yes.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: - I think Tim was talking about it being west of the berm.
MR. BURKE: Yes. Have we increased testing points in Outer Clam Bay?
MR. PETTY: No, sir. We have indications from the county from Mr. McAlpin's office that that
recommendation from the PBS&J report is something that they want to look at. They don't have a specific plan to
date, but we've told them we'd be glad to work with them to the best of our ability once he does have that plan. The
county and Mr. McAlpin have expressed an interest in possibly expanding the criteria. We look at it from, is there any
contamination from our water management system. And I think Mr. McAlpin is looking at it as a health indication of
the bay system itself.
MR. BURKE: Entire system.
MR. PETTY: Yes, sir. More than your stormwater system may be working perfectly fine. We're now going
to use the Pelican Bay experiment, add to it, and start developing our own criteria for what a healthy bay system
should and shouldn't be. Which as you may recall we talked about possibly doing the same thing with NOAA, who
has a ten-year program to do the exact same parameter which is what is the determination of a healthy coastal zone.
Well, Mr. McAlpin is the Coastal Zone Manager and I think he's looking to develop that. And I'm kind of proud that he
picked Pelican Bay to start.
MR. BURKE: Uh-huh.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Anything else?
MS. WOMBLE: I understood that also and I'm thrilled. Thank you, Mr. McAlpin.
580
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
16~'
"'B'~''''.''''''
.. '":, ').
. ;
t"
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I have some questions. It says development of a county sponsored random station
location. Do you know what he means with that?
MR. PETTY: These are all works in progress. We had a meeting yesterday where we talked a little bit about
how it would start and the primary concerns and talked with Mr. Leo Ochs about how it would be implemented. Ifs
still very much a work in progress. We don't want to push Mr. McAlpin into having to do this overnight. This is
something that you want to do with due diligence and care. He has some broad objectives and an aggressive
program. I think his time frame is that over the next year or so is where we would go over these one at a time.
MR. McALPIN: Potentially we're looking at developing a plan, implementation.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Gary, would you come up to the mic, please. Thank you.
MR. McALPIN: For the record, Gary McAlpin, Coastal Zone Management. Yes. We're looking over
approximately a one-year period of time coming up, looking at the recommendations maybe adding some, taking
some off, and working with the Pelican Bay Services Division to define what we want to do and then an
implementation plan. We're really in the really early stages of that right now and we want to make sure that we want
to get it right. Thafs why we're spending some time and making sure that the proper support and nourishment for this
plan is there.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Thank you.
MR. McALPIN: Once we have a framework that we as a community can agree on and then I think we would
talk to the appropriate organizations.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay. Thank you. I have a question. Mr. Hall, are the reports that you prepare, as
well as the other two reports, available on the Intemet or not?
MR. PETTY: Mr. Hall's reports are on the Internet year by year.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Oh, all three reports?
MR. PETTY: Every annual report that has ever done is up there.
MR. HALL: Yes, the entire thing goes on the Pelican Bay Services Division's website.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay. Thank you. Excuse my ignorance, what's QC?
MR. PETTY: Quality - quality control.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Oh, quality. What's QA?
581
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
,
.... If "
.1,:; r
B
,''''
r'
MR. PETTY: Questions and answers.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Oh, it is
MR. PETTY: Or quality analysis I would assume if it was anything other than that.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Oh, okay. Quality analysis and quality control.
MR. PETTY: I think that has to do with when you're taking your samples, that's always been done by staff.
And as the test gets more complicated as you look at different items, there is a chain of custody style quality control
criteria that you would adopt to make sure that the results were reliable. Some of the spikes that you may see in this
result are based on just a bad sample graph or bad analysis. So you have to take that into consideration. As you go
into more technical analysis, the lab will get more and more refined on how that must go and they're recommending
that a quality control program be enhanced to cover that.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: The next question it says, As well as required data uploads into STORET,
S-T-O-R-E-T. What is that?
MR. PETTY: Mr. Hall can define it. You defined it to me because I asked him the same question.
MR. HALL: Yes. STORET is a state water quality database where a lot of different agencies will upload their
information so it becomes public. Mike, I'm not sure. I think some of it is only available to governmental agencies or
private access, but a majority of it is also available publicly.
MR. BAUER: It's pretty much available publicly, but it's extremely user unfriendly. You really have to actually
get trained in how to get into and out of it. It's bad.
MR. PETTY: I think the understanding was that this is a commonly checked referenced work for the
scientific community. And as we have seen over the years, various people have come into Pelican Bay and have
done their evaluations, written their reports with various angles of accuracy compared to our long-term view and
sometimes we end up repeating ourselves. So maybe if we adopt a central database, maybe we can start
referencing everybody to it and start getting this body of work into a central standard if you will. I don't know if that's
possible because in Mr. Hall's industry they tend to argue a lot. STORET is what everybody's adopting so far for that
Internet library, I guess, for storing data.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: On Item 3 of the recommendations I presume that's all aimed at Outer Clam Bay.
Should we look at the other bays also? Mr. Hall, do you have any suggestions on that?
582
j"'''1r,
....,,~'-l!':::..
rr y
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
MR. HALL: Well, again, it depends on the type of survey, the type of work you would do, would be what you
want your final product to be. If you want to know the sea grass coverage or the oyster coverage for the entire bay,
you'd have to go out there and survey the entire system. If you want to know what the trends are over time, then you
would do that random point generated survey that Dr. Tomasko had started in his report. And if you wanted to
monitor just specific areas, then you do the transect survey that we do for the sea grass beds. It just depends on
whether you're trying to monitor one specific habitat or general trends or actual numbers for the entire system.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Mr. Hall, as long as you're up there, how deep is Outer Clam Bay? What is the
deepest that you have come across?
MR. HALL: At high tide the deepest is probably six feet. At low tide it's about four feet.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay. That's the deepest, but average is, what, about two feet, three feet?
MR. HALL: Average depends on the tide.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Right.
MR. HALL: It's probably two and a half to three and a half feet.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay. Thank you.
MR. PETTY: Barbara says she knows a fishing hole where it's 15 foot deep in between the two bays, but
she's not telling us.
MR. HALL: That's not in the bay though.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Then they say, Continued maintenance of monitoring of the stormwater best
management practice system for Pelican Bay. We're doing that already. Then Item 6, Development of a public
education program to increase awareness of those activities that can be done to minimize individual impacts on
stormwater loading. We're doing that through both the Foundation and the Mangrove Action Group who are very
much involved in that. Of course, we're also preparing the video and other information. I believe that Mr. Connell is
thinking of some sort of an informational program for the Men's Coffee and perhaps for the Women's League. Am I
right?
MR. CONNELL: That's correct, yes.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: So I think that is all part of this information. I do have a question. Potential use of
ditch blocks within swale systems. I mean, that is for very heavy rainfalls, isn't it? We have the lakes already.
583
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
-
1(' ,
c:'
B
. ,
c.
MR PETTY: A lot of these suggestions cover the very broad area of the study. We are not considering
those as a specific recommendation to Pelican Bay at all. We think he's addressing the bigger area where they have
direct discharge to the ocean without a water management system. Those types of things would probably hamper
our system. So we're not taking it as anything that we should consider at this time.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: On Item 7, Careful consideration of all aspects of increasing flows into Clam Bay
from urbanized area south of Seagate. Does he mean increasing or decreasing the flows or to analyze increased
flows?
MR PETTY: Again, this is basically outside of the Pelican Bayarea. It's in Venetian Bay and Moorings Bay.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Right, but how it affects Outer Clam Bay. I think what he's saying is we somehow
monitor the waters entering Outer Clam Bay from the south.
MR PETTY: Since the water quality is different from the Pelican Bay area to the Seagate area and south,
he's bringing it up in the report that there is a drastic difference in analysis and you should keep that in mind. It is
something that we do and that we have regularly monitored. Don't forget that, of course, we have a flushing action in
there too. Historically, we haven't seen that either increase or decrease to any respective level. We don't go into
Seagate to do analysis, per se, to show what's going on specifically inside. It's outside of our area. I think thafs what
he's recommending that this is an area that the county or the city may have interest in monitoring in the future
because there is such a difference in water quality between the two zones.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Finally, and this is a subject that I know has come up. I think this is a subject that
has been discussed of the possibility of putting a draw bridge at Seagate so that people from Seagate could have
direct access to the gulf without endangering any sea grasses or shallow bays.
MR McALPIN: In my mind there's two things still that need to be done in terms of studies. And thafs some
kind of a hydrologic study that talks about the interplay between Clam Pass and those pipes underneath Seagate. I
don't think anybody has a really good handle on how that system is working now and maybe how it should work and
that may be something thafs the city's responsibility if we had the money.
And the other issue is what is the water quality in Moorings Bay, Venetian Bay and how is that affecting Outer
Clam Bay because the Dr. Tomasko report was based on land uses and relating land use to water quality. We need
some hard data what that water quality really is.
584
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
1 tt'1
B
~
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Well, I think Mr. Finlay stated earlier, at least in private, that data is available on
water qualities in Moorings and Venetian Bay.
MR. McALPIN: I don't think that it is acceptable data to the state STORET system. I think we have to do this
under strict quality analysis and quality control procedures that are really acceptable to the scientific community.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Thank you.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I think earlier I also - go ahead, Doug. Identify yourself again, please.
MR. FINLAY: Doug Finlay. I wanted to add to that because I am on the board of Save the Bays, which is a
group of people that live on Moorings Bay. It's essentially founded to keep the pass open. Thafs all been taken care
of by TDC funding and other things. Now Save the Bay is a little more focused on water quality in Moorings Bay.
They have recently put out some clams and oysters and they're actually, at least the initial reports, are doing quite
well. This is just a test in conjunction with FGCU. That's right, Mike? FGCU and Save the Bays on the clams?
MR. BAUER: It's primarily FGCU.
MR. FINLAY: Intems or whatever. But Save the Bays and the Conservancy do quarterly water testing. But
like Mr. Bauer says, it's not really what he wants to have. Mr. Bauer wants something that can comply with state
standards. It could be much more extensive. He wants monthly reports, probably more parameters. Basically a
much more extensive water quality testing program.
I happen to agree with that. I want more water testing done. We're trying to look at our taxing district, which I
happen to be on the board of, to see if that taxing district might be able to supplement the cost. Since all
municipalities are going through budgetary restraint issues with Tallahassee, perhaps a contribution from Save the
Bays. They're already paying for some water testing. We could get a bigger contribution from them.
So the only thing I can tell you is there are a group of people in the city who do want to see more water
testing done in Moorings Bay to meet the parameters that we're doing to Naples Bay currently. It's a question of
where do we find the money to get that done. And then like Mr. Bauer also said, we do have an exchange of water
undemeath the culverts, but it's probably not a very heavy volume of an exchange. We just don't know. And it
certainly would be nice to know what type of influence happens there. There are no stormwater outfalls in the City of
Naples that enter into the Seagate area or into Clam Bay. We do have about 74 stormwater outfalls, some of which
do dump into ponds into Moorings Bay. So anyway, that kind of helps explains things.
585
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
161
n
LJ
"'\.
.;
C
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Thank you very much. Earlier, John, I think we discussed about trying to have
Humiston & Moore make a study of the water flow through those culverts.
MR. BURKE: Those were the flap gate culverts?
MR. PETTY: Yes. We have past studies where we have gone out there to try and measure the flow, so
we've got that history. But recent reports by people on-site and others that have gone out there have indicated that
there may be additional choking in that canal where they talk about increased siltation. We know that there is some
movement in there. Whether or not it's going up or down, I think is what we're talking about monitoring. Because we
don't know how it changes over time. That's something, of course, that we would be in discussions with Mr. McAlpin
about on those one-by-one characteristics as we go through this issue. I think that one of our future tasks is that over
the next year we determine how that study occurs and what does it get tied to and who does it.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay. Anything else on the report?
MR. BURKE: One of the versions that I remember from early on with this was a recommendation concerning
the development of a random station location water quality monitoring program for Clam Bay with three to five
stations visited monthly. Is that something completely new to us or are we doing something similar now.
MR. PETTY: We are not doing a random test, per se. And the reason for the random tests would probably
best be explained by someone out of the scientific community. Our tests are all based on the stormwater system and
any deterious effects it may have on Clam Bay. So the random stationing may have more to do with moving life
forms than it does with what we're looking at here with our water management facility.
MR. BURKE: So it would be in addition to what we do?
MR. PETTY: Yes.
MR. BURKE: Okay.
MR. PETTY: And that's part of that discussion we're going to be having.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: We actually have two locations in Outer Clam Bay right now that we're monitoring.
One right at Seagate and one near the Foundation Park.
MR. PETTY: That we take samples from for that nutrient loading -
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Yes.
MR. PETTY: Yes, sir.
586
,.:Y ,
'" 0
B'-e
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
MS. WOMBLE: Actually, I believe that Dr. Tomasko had made the comment that if you don't do random
sampling, you can't really use the data. I don't know how accurate that is, but that was one of his comments.
MR. PETTY: I think it's very similar to when an attorney gives you legal advice. If you agree with the advice,
you take it. If you don't, you get another attorney.
MS. WOMBLE: Or doctor.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Anything else on the PBS&J report?
(No response.)
UPDARE ON "RENEWAL APPLICATION" OR "EXTENSION" OF MANAGEMENT PLAN
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Now, the next item is an update on the renewal application or extension of the
management plan. John, I don't know if you would like to get into that, please.
MR. PETTY: That was part of our discussions yesterday with Mr. McAlpin and the rest of the county staff.
We do have the permit being reviewed by the County Manager's Office and whoever he designates it to. Coastal
Zone Management has been asked to take a look at it. Gary has already spoken about what is in genesis right now.
We have talked about, well, do we just submit it to the agency and then any add-ons can happen six months, a year
down the road because it should be a two-year process we understand.
I think Mr. McAlpin prefers and I pretty much agree that you don't want to be sending a permit up there and
then direct it differently with a change later on. There should be a common thought or objective in the permit itself.
And the concern is if we add things to it at a later date, we're sending mixed signals.
With that in mind, we're going to be discussing probably asking for an extension since the permit has been
held up for a couple of months. We're supposed to have a two-year process and I think we're into that two-year time
frame. So it is probable that during the first part of the year, January/February, staffs going to be coming back and
asking for an extension. We've already had some preliminary talks with Turrell, Hall & Associates on that issue. Give
the county a little a little bit more time if you would and then at the next meeting or two we'll come back with that
recommendation on whether it should be an extension or whether we just go for the permit submittal, but we're asking
for it in a month or two.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: But our present permit expires July 2008. Thafs six months from now.
MR. PETTY: Yes
587
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
16 ,
1""
,J
~J
,;;"
C.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: How long can we operate without an extension in place I guess if it takes time to get
an extension?
MR. PETTY: I think the extension, while it's being reviewed would be granted anyway. We're not looking to
default on the issue. And if there's any pressure in that regard, we will immediately bring it to your attention for
consideration. But for right now it is probable that we'll come back to you in either January or February and we will
ask for your permission to go for an extension. Whatever that time frame is will depend on Tim's discussions with the
agencies and the need that we feel we're going to have to give the County the chance to come up with the right
program.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Thank you. Mrs. Womble, do you have any questions?
MR. WOMBLE: No.
MR. BURKE: I'm all right.
STATUS OF ADDITIONAL OSPREY NEST
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: The next subject then the status of an additional osprey nest. I was told that we
couldn't do anything during the turtle season. So that's over. By the way, I walked past the existing nest. I think that
there are new birds there, small birds because I heard loud peeping.
MR. HALL: Yes, I believe so.
MR. BURKE: Is this our fourth nesting?
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Oh, yes. Fourth year. They seem to build the nests up a little more each year.
MR. HALL: Mr. Lukasz and I actually met with a contractor on Monday.
MR. HALL: Showed the site and we're going to provide him with him the specifications. He's going to get a
price back to Mr. Lukasz. The contractor would then be in charge of the Vehicle on The Beach Permit and the
building permit and the other issues required from the county. We have all of the other authorization that are
required. It is now just now a matter of local approvals and getting it put in place before turtle season starts again.
CHAIRMAN DOMEN1E: Okay. Thank you.
MR. BURKE: Mr. Domenie, I know you walk the beach a lot. But that osprey nest is a little bit of a tourist
attraction especially those that are here for the first time. They're stopping and looking. And, of course, they're
thinking it's an eagle.
588
.clam Bay .committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
,
L ,~ i
B
~.. 10
C
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Do you want to put up a sign that says this is an osprey?
MR. BURKE: If you put another nest up, the ospreys are territorial; correct?
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: That was my question.
MR. PETTY: Let me jump in. They're not that bad. If you go down the old access to Marco Island, which is
through Goodland, the southern access, you'll see up on the poles several of them so many feet apart. And they
have five or so up there. I always thought why would you put these things next to a road where everybody tries to pull
off and look up at the nest and their car gets taken out by the semis in the roadway. This is much nicer. You're on
the beach. There's no trailer to come and wipe you out and you can spend all the time you want.
MR. HALL: You can also see them along the 1-4 corridor going through the center of the state. You see
them on almost every power pole along the road.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Also in Key West.
MR. PETTY: They don't flock together, but if you keep the nests so many feet apart, you're okay.
MR. BURKE: They built their own nest on the power poles?
MR. HALL: Yes.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Thank you.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I just have two comments. You know these people that go to the beach, South
Beach sandbar, how Clam Pass Park Beach has increased dramatically in size and the tip of it is nearly even with our
Sandbar Beach. It really has grown dramatically. I don't know how or where that sand has come from, but it has
grown.
MR. PETTY: If we could find out who's responsible and tell them to keep it up, that would be nice.
MR. BURKE: But we're not losing sand, are we?
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I think we have lost a little but, you know, it comes and goes. Some days you go
down there and with high tide it's all the way high. At the moment some new sand seems to be forming in the shallow
water. So I don't know where that is coming from either. I'm going to make a radical suggestion or question if I may.
If you walk on the south boardwalk and you come to that open space and you're looking at acres of non-beach quality
sand. Then I'm thinking we have two areas in Pelican Bay where our dunes could be broached or broken through in
case of a major hurricane hilling us, one just south of Clam Pass Park and one more or less parallel with Inner Clam
589
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19, 2007
161 B
~~
c.
Bay. And I just looked at that and I said I know in the past in 1998 we pumped that type of sand along the beach.
wondered if this is something that should be considered to strengthen the dunes with non-beach quality sand. And,
secondly, if you dig a lot of that sand out of there, then would you get more flushing through the pass also? And, I
mean, irs radical and requires approvals from 20 different people and I don't know who would pay for it, but it's just a
question that I have.
MR. PETlY: Mr. Chairman, it's a very valid question. It is one that I think all of us have said when we've
looked at that point: Does that need to be cleaned out or is that the way iI's supposed to be? And all kinds of issues
come up such as navigation which we've never said we're pro or con about. We're all about the health of the bay
system.
I have had prepared preliminary talks with Mr. McAlpin who brought this subject up in regard to the sand
needs of the Clam Pass Park and dredging. And I talked about how far back can we go. Can you - how far back
can you go to get beach quality sand? I said because some of that appears to be a choke point further back. And
Gary was very good about saying, listen, if it needs to come out of there for the health of the bay system, don't worry
about it. We'll find the right spot for it. And I think he is looking at things like the basin doing restoration in other such
suitable areas where you would put that deposited material.
We haven't looked at that area because it didn't really impact the large mangrove areas that we had the big
concern over. As we talk with the County and look at this expanded consciousness and as Pelican Bay kind of
warms up to the idea of going beyond mangroves to other flora and fauna of the bay system, I think we do start
looking at things of that nature. So I know that the County has already considered such items and I'm excited that
you've seen it too. And I'm sure we'll be talking about such things over the next year.
MR. BURKE: Mr. Domenie, what was the second dune area that you mentioned? I knew the first one.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I'm showing it right near Inner Clam Bay. And the other one is south of the Clam
Pass Park. That Inner Clam Bay area, during one of the no-name storms water or sand drifted in about 150 feet with
water and that's when we rEHlnforced it. We got permission to bring in sand to rEHlnforce the dunes, but this would
be using that non-beach quality sand or soil.
MR. PETlY: Which is appropriate for this location.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay. Anybody else have any questions?
590
Clam Bay Committee Meeting
December 19,2007
l~ r B
~. .'<i'
c!-
MR. BURKE: I'll second it.
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: All in favor?
(Unanimous response.)
CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: No discussion. Thank you very much everybody,
.J.J..J.J.J. J.J
There being no further business, the meeting was adjoumed by order of the Chainnan at 11:15 a.m.
JOHN DOMENIE, CHAIRMAN
TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC., BY CAROLYN J,
FORD, RPR, FPR, NOTARY PUBLIC. - FORMATTED BY BARBARA SMITH, PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION
591
'If
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 16
Print on pink pap}A~ ~~i~oc~~t~?~r~m~~~~~~?e~e~~ t~!!:~~~c;~~o~~?'~~~n~and original K 5
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, andlor information needed. If the document is already complete with the
exception of the Chairman's sianature; draw a line throng!: routin~ lines #1 through #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(Listinroutingorde.r)
1. tZo~ ~...( c../~o ;l.-;z..,,-o~
fZ-c..-
2.
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County eommissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of eourt' s Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Nonnally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional OJ' missing
information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature arc to be delivered to the Bee office only after the BeC has acted to approve the
item.)
Name ofPrirnary Staff t<c6-vt"7 { , Phone Number >' <1 eo ""2-
Contact ,
Agenda Date Item was 2 - -Z ~ -0 'if Agenda Item Number (, 1<5"
Approved by the BCC
Type of Document A-ffi'o;cw,'}- -t C.......,,~.p- Number of Original ~ fJ'<; tef,i"
Attached Documents Attached " 01('0
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/ A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a fO date.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exc t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are r uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Pilson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
The document was approved by the BCC on ' (enter date) and all changes
made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The
Conn Attorne 's Office has reviewed the cban es, if a Ucable.
,,'^
.f-o
cAo
Yes
(Initial)
N/ A (Not
A licable)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
r2"'Z--
r2-~
12'l..-
,Q-z.....
(2"Z.
oz;....
1: Forms! County Forms! Bee Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip wws Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
.. . _.....,,~......- '----_..~..._--_..,._.,~._--.,;--_._--~._,..-~
16K5
MEMORANDUM
Date: February 27,2008
To: Robert Zachary, Assistant County Attorney
Office of the County Attorney
From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re: Affidavit and Consent
Enclosed please find one original of the document referenced above,
Agenda Item #16K5, adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008.
The Minutes andd Records Department has kept an original as part of
the Board's permanent record.
If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-8411.
Thank you.
Enclosure
J6
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
)
)
)
SS: COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX
AFFIDAVIT AND ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION
I, Paul C. Bauer, on this 5th day of February, 2008, after first being duly sworn, on oath
state as follows:
1. I am over the age of 21 years, and if called to testify to the contents of this
Affidavit, I am able and competent to do so.
2. I am currently licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, in
good standing, and I represent Light Tower Wireless LLC.
3. My client, Light Tower Wireless LLC is the assignee of a lease originally
executed by Acme Towers, Inc. and Collier County, Florida.
4. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge the following chain of
assigrunents from Acme Towers, Inc. down to Light Tower Wireless LLC is true and correct:
Land Lease Agreement dated as of April 13, 1999 between Collier County and
Acme Towers, Inc., as evidenced by that certain Memorandum of Lease
recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida on October 26, 1999,
in Official Records Book 2605, Page 0106, with Acme Towers, Inc. assigning
all of its assets, including the above-described lease, to Acme Tower Group,
LLC pursuant to that certain Bill of Sale, Assigrunent and Assumption
Agreement dated as of December 27, 2000, and with Acme Tower Group, LLC
assigning all of its assets, including the above-described lease, to ClearS hot
Communications, LLC pursuant to that certain Bill of Sale, Assigrunent and
Assumption Agreement dated as of June 28, 2001. The membership interests
in ClearShot Communications, LLC were assigned to National Grid Wireless
Holdings, Inc. pursuant to that certain Assigrunent of Limited Liability
Company Interests, Other Agreements and Acceptance of Assigrunent and
Agreement to be Bound dated October 2, 2006. elearShot Communications,
LLC was merged with and into National Grid Communications, Inc. pursuant
to Articles of Merger filed with the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts on November 2, 2006. National Grid Communications, Inc.
was converted into Light Tower Wireless, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, evidenced by the filing of a Certificate of Conversion from a
Page I of3
{Client File5\REA\306080\OOO 1 \F0451809.DOC; 1}
corporation to a limited liability company filed with the Secretary of State of
the State of Delaware on August 14,2007.
16K5
5. I am submitting this Affidavit and Attorney Certification to induce Collier
County, Florida, through its Board of County eommissioners, to execute certain consent
agreements to facilitate loan transactions that Light Tower Wireless, LLC has heretofore made.
FURmER YOUR AFfIANT SAYlW'NAUGHT:@c [],
PAUL C. BAUER
I, the undersigned Notary Public in and for the Commonwealth of Massachus tts, hereby
certify that one PAUL C. BAUER, who is 'f.. personally known to me, or has produced the
following identification ,
appeared before me this ~ day of j::e:On Y\ ~ ' 2008 and, after first been duly
sworn on oath, acknowledged that he freely and vol arily affixed his signature to the above
and foregoing Affidavit and Certification of Attorney.
tf//fl /: tf6
ARY PUBLIC
MMONWEALTH OF
MASSACHUSETTS
Printed Name
Commission Expires:
* MEGHAN E O'NEIL
NOTARY PUBLIC
~IIWEN.TH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Y Commission Expires May 16, 2014
Page 2 of3
{Client Files\REA\306080\OOO 1 \F0451809.DOC;I}
t, "
ACCEPTANCE OF AFFIDAVIT AND eERTIFICA TION OF A HORNEY this 2.C:. day of
~ b ,2008.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLITY, F ORIDA .
By
TOM HENNING, eHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
DWIs:w;t;;~;~ROCK
q~~R:0F.(f~TS
" fl', '. furGll'"
~'~1k
4) 1.jJl1aturtQ<<1 ~
Appro~~d ~s to form and
Legal sufficiency;
~
RobertN. Za y, Esq.
Assistant County Attorney
Page 3 of3
{Client FiJes\REA \306080\0001 \F045 1809 .DOC; I)
M____
Bowditch
&Dewey
16K5
!\1c~hiHI E. Q'Nl'i1
Din;c1Idl.'phonc: (50S) 416.2466
Direct fal.:simik: (SOl(l929-300]
l:mall: ll\oncil((~'!b(nvditch.(;oll1
December 10.1007
VIA FACSIMILE NO. (239) 774-0225
David C. Weigel, Esquire
County Altomey
Collier County
3301 E. Tamiami Trail, S", Fl()(jr
Naples, FL 34112
Re: PCS Site Agreement (the "Lease") by and between Collier County ("Landlord")
and Acme Towers, 111(;. predecessor in interest of Light TO\vcr ,^!ireless LLC
("Tenant") for Certain Property ill Collier County. florida ("'Premises")
Dear Altomey Weigel:
! am writing to you in your capacity as the owner of the Premises.
We represent the Tenant with respect to the Lease. Paragraph 6 of the Lease provides that Tenant
will not mortgage the Lease without the written consent of the Owner, which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld 01' unreasonably delayed. The Tenant has entered into the following 1l1011gages:
Leasehold MOl1gage from Light Towel' Wireless LLC to General Electric Capital Corporation
dated August 15. 2007 and recorded in the Public Records in Collier County, FL on October I J, 1007 in
Book 4191. Page 2677 and Leasehold Mortgage from Light Towel' Wireless LLC to General Electric
Capital Corporation dated August 15,2007 and recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, FL on
October II, 2007 in Book 4191, Page 1700 ("'Mortgages").
Pursuant to Section 6, at your earliest convenience, please acknowledge your consent by (I)
executing thi.":J' letter below, and (2) returning tlte origina/tu me at the above address.
If you have any questions, please contact me as soon as possible at (50S) 416-2466, or via email
ut moneiI1{)bowditch.com. Thank you for yoor prompt attention to this matter.
Sincercly,
r ~.
-l,'.oI"'{'; I,;
::'iJ~~f~;:n E. O'Neil
f)ar~legal
;;/~
0..
.-.-/<................... ~~?".
;,:;;,::,,' ,",;;.." ',.,,", ",'! ;i{.}.'j
t': '.' j' J "I1~"r"
,
CR
u
Name: Tom Henning, CHAIRMAN
Dalc:_.?.....2.<f,- CLK_
:Ctil'l1l Fik:j,ln,\Jfl()o~(r,(I(jOI',.'i1'\:f),\',] l'rn.I{'';'..j'O..J..t 117K[J()( ; 1)
l? A
COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA
REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a:
xxx Normal Legal Advertisement Other:
(Display Adv., location, etc.)
*********.***********************************************************************************.*******
Originating Deptl Div: Comm.Dev .Serv ./Planning
Person: Willie Brown, Alep ~ Date: 1 \).1..\ \ c"&:
Petition No. (If none, give brief description): CU~2007~AR-12384. Enterprise Rental Car
Petitioner: (Name & Address):Enterprise Leasing Company, D/B/A Enterprise Rent A Car, Jon Ellsworth, 4350 Fowler St., #
24, Ft Myers, FL 33901
Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk!s Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) LH & D
Properties LLC, 13560 Tamiami Trail N., Naples, FL 34110
Hearing before BCC
BZA
Other
Requested Hearing date:
Februarv 26. 2008
Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing.
Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important):
XXX Naples Daily News
Other
Legally Required
Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: Petition: CUw2007-AR-12384. Enterprise Leasing
Company d/b/a Enterprise Rentwa-Car, applicant and owner, is requesting a Conditional Use pursuant to LDC Section
2.04.03 for a rental car agency within the C-4 zoning district. The subject property is located 13560 Tamiami Trail North,
Suite 8, Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida.
Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date:
Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? Yes
131-138326-649100
No It Yes. what account should be charged for advertising costs:
Reviewed by: Approved by:
~ \.-f'h .~ /<p-/of
Department Head Date ' County Manager
Date
List Attachments:
DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS
A. For hearings before Bee or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval
before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal
review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The
Manager's office will distribute tupies:
County Manager agenda file: to
Requesting Division
Original Clerk's Office
B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file.
*************************************************************************.****.**.******..*******.***
FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY:
Date Received: ~ Date of Public hearing:~ Date Advertised: z../ Ie !ntO
17A
RESOLUTION NO. 08-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONJNG APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE
ESTABUSHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO AlLOW
AN AUTOMOBILE RENTAL AGENCY IN THE GENERAL
COMMERCIAL (C-4) ZONING DISTRICT AT 13560
TAMlAMI TRAIL NORTH (SR 45), IN SECTION 15,
TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH. RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of
Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes. has conferred on Collier County the power to
establish, coor~inate and enforce zoning and such blLSiness regulations as are necessary for the
protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code
(Ordinance No. 2004AI, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among
which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing and has considered
the advisability of a Conditional Use for a automobile rental agency in the General COlmnercial
(C-4) Zoning District, pursuant to Land Development Code Section 2.04,03, Table 2, on the
property described in Exhibit "B", and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit nAn) that
satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters
required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 1O,OS.OQ,D of the Land
Development Code, as amended; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this
Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier
County, Florida, that:
Petition CU-2007-AR-12384, filed by Enterprise Leasing Company d/b/a Enterprise
Rent-A-Car, with respect to the property described in Exhibit "B," attached hereto and
incorporated by reference herein, is hereby approved for a Conditional Use pursuant to Section
2.04.03, Table 2, of the Collier County Land Development Code in the General Commercial
(C-4) Zoning District, for an automobile rental agency in accordance with the Conceptual Site
Page 1 of2
17A
Plan (Exhibit "C") and subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "D," attached hereto and
incorporated by reference herein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resoiution be recorded in the minutes of this
Board.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super-majority vote, this _ day of
,2008.
ATTEST:
D~GHTE.BROCK,CLERK
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COllIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
, Deputy Clerk
JAMES COLETTA, Chairman
Ap
and
ow
ounty Attorney
Exhibits (attached): A.
B.
C.
D.
Findings of Fact
Legal Description
Conceptual Site Plan
Conditions of Approval
Page 2 of2
17A
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007-AR-12384
The following facts are found:
1. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the oonditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same distlict or neighborhood because of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes V/ No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress ygress
YesL No_
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
_ No affect or /~ffect mitigated by <text> l-.io.-J!, l (v\A.Q) <:cV'-yU ,
_Affect cannot be mitigated L OC- LCV\.Sv.~~-.......
D. Compatibility with adjacent propelties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
Yes v---No
lr' /,"'. ~)CJ-I ~ (i'J-.- fJ v..t<7L
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATEd ,. n -Dr
CHAIRMAN:
EXHffilT A
, ,.
:,,111.J! I h
17 A
,.
i!\'
FINDING OF FACT
BY'
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007-AR-12384
The following facts are found:
1. Section <text> of the Land Development eode authorized the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will
not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or
neighborhood because of:
^' Consistency with the Land Development eode and Growth Management Plan:
Yes I No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes V No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
- No affect or / Affect mitigated by <text>
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
eompatible use within district
Yes / No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE:
/ //7 /!JJY
! /
MEMBER:drl/lL, ';t-t'~ ~u
EXHIBIT A
17 A
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007-AR-12384
The following facts are found:
I. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will
not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or
neighborhood because of:
A. eonsistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yesl No_
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yesi No
e. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
A No affect or . _ Affect mitigated by <text>
Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other ptoperty in the district:
eompatible use within district
Yes.L No_ If
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with ipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE: iSBIv \'1 Zoo'i?
MEMBER: .;
\!,(7t,n .$(\j\~~
EXHIBIT A
17 A
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007-AR-123S4
The following facts are found:
I. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will
not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or
neighborhood because of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development eode and Growth Management Plan:
Yes t/ No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access ill case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes~ No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
No affect or ~ Affect mitigated by <text>
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
Yes ~ No
Based on the above fmdings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE: 1- 11- (J f
MEMBER:
7;?~
EXHIBIT A
17 A
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007-AR-12384
The following facts are found:
I. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will
not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or
neighborhood . because of;
A. eonsistency with the Lan1evelopment eode and Growth Management Plan:
Yes No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress /
Yes -Y- No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects: j -
No affect or _ Affect mitigated by <text> jti~{tiJ'l'.
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. eompatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within disJt
Yes No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, wit stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE:
MEMBER:
EXHIBIT A
17A
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007-AR-12384
The following facts are found:
1. Section <text> of the Land Development eode authorized the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will
not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or
neighborhood because of:
A.
Consistency with the Land7e <610pment eode and Growth Management Plan:
Yes_ No_
B.
Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
c.
Adequate ingress & egres/:
. Yes_ No
Affects nej.ghboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effectV
L No affect or _ Affect mitigated by <text>
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D.
eompatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within diS%'
Yes_ No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
MEMBER: ~
DATE: / ~ /1 ..-- 0 Y
EXHIBIT A
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
17A
CU-2007-AR-12384
The following facts are found:
1. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will
not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or
neighborhood because of:
A.
Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes /NO_
B.
Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
C.
Adequate ingress & egress /"
YesL No_
Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
~o affect or _ Affect mitigated by <text>
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D.
Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
YesL No_
Based on the above frodings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE: I~/?- oj'
~A&/;?r t/IC-.{ (cn-r"
EXHIBIT A
17 A
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007-AR-12384
The following facts are found:
1. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will
not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or
neighborhood . because of:
A. eonsistency with the Land Development eode and Growth Management Plan:
Yes~ No_
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of flIe or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes v/ No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
_ No affect or ~fect mitigated by <text>
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. eompatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
eompatible use within di7
Yes No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE: J } J'1 / 0 ~
f
MEMBER:~~
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
17 A
ENTERPRISE RENTAL CAR
CU-2007-AR-12384
All T.hat par-t of Sec.tion 15, 'row:lship 48 South, Range 2:'
East. Collie~ county, Florida, bainq more particul~rly
de$cribed as follows:
commencinq at the West 1/4 corner of ~aid Section 15: thence
along the South line ot the Nor~hwest 1/4 ot said Section
IS. Sout.h 89. 33' 40" East 14.59 feet to t.he E:asterly riq,ht-
of~way lin@ of U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail); thence along aaid
right-ot-way line and the West~rly line of that land as
d~~crLbed in Official Records Book 1110, Page 1794. of the
Public Rec.ords of Collier county, florida, tlart.h O. 37' 46'
W~st :H~. '13 feet to ,the Point of Beqinning Q! t.he parcel
herein described':
thence continue along said 'line, North 0" 31' 466 West
1'33,24 teet;
thence continue alonQ ~aid linel Northerly l04.a6 feet
the arc of a circula.r curve concave to the \-l'est havinq
radi:u5 of 3,919.12 feet 'artd being subtended by a chor:d
bears North 1- 23' 4S~ West 104.86 teet;
thence leaving said 1 in~1 South 89. 33' 40'" 'East 346.32
teet;
thence SOlJth
thence North
Beg inning of
along
.
which
0" 26' 2'0'" "lest 238.02 feetj
e9# )3' 4.0. West 340.48 feet to
th~ parcel herein describeQ.
the Point of
ExnffiIT "B"
a;:;g
w ~ I
&-...
;Z'"
W ~ I
(J ~ .
... ,. [,
.... I- [I
UJ ~ ill
- 011
a: ~ I.;
z ....,
::lI 30 :
(J) Q ".
I
,
I
,
-'
17 A
J~;;;'~'f~~
:"t; 11_ -'-"
....t~ ' ., .
I
I """"""""""''''m'
1$UJ!I~ 21illtitUUil ....=c..-co ~
,\
JI\
'-
>
,
d\
(-6\
a- I.
l:r~
it.'
,r~
r~
L_._. ./
"
..._~-_._-
~-4' t9 ,l,....MH9lH 'Sn
,
,
,
"
!
~ IU "
I - . ~ i llt1 M" r: ti
. " Ii n Hi! ,,;t I 'I,
.i ~ Iii I'" I,: h
!~ i.H ~
r I t'il 'II' ! I,
, i~1 . i( ~ uH J ! :: i,q !~ i, i
'I /, ,
U l.ll' iii; -fl, 'ml
Ill( h
Iy I Iii i (III l!1I! I It
I l i ~ .
! II.! !! ! I h s
r-'~ l,~ @--_. k:
l~m~l
H..r.i
.~~
i ~l!d ~rl
i 1-'-
I [ .
L ~ 1.(\ ,1~ 'l; ~ . a
: i . l
3 I Oi . l, , II
~ ~ t~ ') .....;
lL. ! ~ I
~" ...._--.J
, I, Ii
i ~R ~
,
, ~ I
I.
, , , l.
,
, , .
! ! ~
, , 5
~~'
i~l
.
~
r-
~
C:'
;> -
gj..: Iii
<C ::>
u Q
....1
<(
..;-""t>-
00 Zgj N
'" 0
N 0
- 00
~g}gt-
-<"'O~
I~OV1
r-ffiN~
o ..0
o o-
N r 0"
~ z .& tJ
UWO:::O
i
EXHlBIT "c"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Enterprise Rental Car CU
CU-2007-AR-12384
Conditions:
1. Within 180 days of the date of approval of this conditional use, landscaping as
depicted on the originally approved February. 1999 Landscaping Plan. prepared
by Phoenix Planning & Engineering Inc., for the Phoenix Center, shall be
installed to meet the minimum approved standards of this plan. and shall be
inspected for compliance by Collier County. Should a permit be required to
install said landscaping or to install or repair any irrigation, said permit shall be
obtained prior to installation or repair.
EXIDBIT "D"
17 A
17A
, .
January 29,2008
Attn: Legals
Naples Daily News
1075 Central Avenue
Naples, Florida 34102
Re: CU-2007-AR-12384, Enterprise Rental Car
Dear Legals:
Please advertise the above referenced notice on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and
kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges
involved, to this office.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Teresa Polaski,
Deputy Clerk
P.O.lAccount # 131-138326-649100
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
1., A
-
Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 26,
2008 in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier
County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples,
Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The title of the
proposed resolution is as follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW AN AUTOMOBILE RENTAL AGENCY IN THE
GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-4) ZONING DISTRICT AT 13560 TAMIAMI
TRAIL NORTH (SR 45), IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE
25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Petition CU-2007-AR-12384, Enterprise Leasing Company d/b/a
Enterprise Rent-a-Car, applicant and owner, is requesting a
Conditional Use pursuant to LDC Section 2.04.03 for a rental car
agency within the C-4 zoning district. The subject site is located
13560 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 8, Section 15, Township 48 South,
Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida.
NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must
register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of
the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be
limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual
to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If
recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or
organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item.
Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in
the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3
weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case,
written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be
submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days
prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations
before the Board will become a permanent part of the record.
Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need
a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may
need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation
in order to participate in this proceeding; you are entitled, at
no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please
contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department,
located at 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Building W, Naples, Florida
34112, (239) 252-8380. Assisted listening devices for the hearing
impaired are available in the County Commissioners' Office.
17 A
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-eountyof Collier
I._-
CLERK OF THE CIR., CUJT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY q;OURT,OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI 'f,R.^IL EAST
P.O. BOt 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA 'r~ to 1-30f4
... .
17 A
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
January 29, 2008
Enterprise Leasing Company, DIBI A Enterprise Rent A Car
J on Ellsworth
4350 Fowler St., # 24
Ft. Myers, FL 33901
Re: Petition CU-2007-AR-12384, Enterprise Rental Car
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
G2:U.JJCl PO[tL~ ~C
Teresa Polaski,
Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Web site- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierc1erk(Q)c1erk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
'.eounty of Collier
t.
CLERK OF THE CIRCUJT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY <tOURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAM11(R,AIL EAST
P.O. BOt 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA 'r~ 1 0 1-30~4
*.
17 A
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
January 29,2008
LH & D Properties LLC
13560 Tamiami Trail N.
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition CU-2007-AR-12384, Enterprise Rental Car
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~~\L
Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email- collierclerklalc1erk.collier.fl.us
17A
Teresa L. Polaski
To:
Subject:
legals@naplesnews.com
GU-2007-AR-12384, Enterprise Rental Car
Attachments:
CU-2007 -AR-12384.doc; CU-2007-AR-12384.doc
Legals,
Please advertise the following on Sunday, February 10, 2008. Thank you
~
~
CU-2007-AR-12384 CU-2007-AR-12384
.doc (28 KB) .doc (28 KB)
Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III
Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners
Minutes and Records Department
239-252-8411
(T eresa.Po las ki@collierclerk.com)
1
Teresa L. Polaski
17A
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
postmaster@collierclerk.com
Wednesday, January 30,20089:25 AM
Teresa L. Polaski
Delivery Status Notification (Relay)
Attachments:
ATT475856.txt; CU-2007-AR-12384, Enterprise Rental Car
1':..:1
~
r;-.;:l
L:..J
ATT475856.txt
(231 B)
CU-2007-AR-12384
, Enterprise R..
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested
delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination.
legals@naplesnews.com
'IIAPLES DAILY NEWS
Publislied Daih
Naples, FL 141112
Affidavit of Publication
State of Florida
County of Collier
Before the undersigned they sen'e as the authority. personally
appeared Phil Lewis, who on oath says that they
serve as the Editor of the Naples Daily, a daity newspaper
published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed
III Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy
of the :ldvcl1ising. being a
PUBLIC NOTICE
in the mattcr of PUBLIC NOTICE
was published III said newspapcr 1 time in the issue
on, February] 0'" 2008
Affianlll1l1her say's that the said Naples Daily :'\ews is a nev.'spaper
published at ~aples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said
n..~\I'srarer has h~rctor()re h.::cn continuously published in said Collier
Ctlll11l\ l'lor-ida. dislrihuh:d in Collier and Lee counties of Florida,
cad, day and has hc..::n cnlen::d as s~'cond dass mail mal1cr at the post
olli,:c in ~apks. III said Collier County. Florida, for a period of I
\car Il,cxl prc.:cding 111," firsl publicatil)Jl o[thc attached copy or
a,h"cl1iscl11cnl: and afliant 1llrth"r says that he has Tl~ither paid nOf
prollli~..:J all;' p':J~Oll. firm or l:orporatioll allY disl:\JUlll. r.:hat..:.
cUl11mission 01" r.:llmd f~lf Ih.: pllrpOS~ oj" securing this ad\"l,::ttis~l1I~nt l~)f
p" "on~n the ~'"P''I''' _
, ,', <-l/k-
( Slgnat ure of a flan!)
Sworn to and subscribed before me
This lOth.200S
Day of Fcbruarv 20118
,_L/j ~~
(Signatuiotnotary p#lic)
//
~~
/!/A:r.~:f~~:l
?.~. .:.,g
~:r.. ,.,so::
"'~,iil.:r,,~"
NANCY EVANS
Commission DD 657030
Expires July 18, 2011
~Th!1,jTmvF~lnlnllUraocealXl.385-7019
CU.;IOOZ,All-l1lll4
NOTICE Of
PUBLIC ,1iEAJItNG', I
Notice Is herebY' given I
that the Board of COunty
Commissioners of' Col-
lIercountx wlll-liold II
~tHlC he~on Tues-
th~ 1:~o,",~~~
Floor, Admlnlstra,tlon
Building. Com,r County
GovernmentC:enter.
3301 East Tamlaml TI'IJI.
Naples. Flortda. The
meetlngwllJ.;,bagln at
9:00 A.M~ 1'ht- title of the
proposed, resolution I,
. as follows:
A- RESOLUTION OF THE
BOARD OF ZONING AP.
PEALS OF COLllEA
~p~nrFcf~"'::
llSHMENT OF A CONDI-
T10NALoUSE -m AUQ.W
AN AUTOMOBILE RENT-
Al AGENCV ll(lfo4l-~-
ERAl COMMERCfAl (C-
4) ~ONINQ DlmlCT AT
13560 TAMIAMl 'TJtAIL
NORTH (SR 45l,IN,SEC-
TION 15. TOWNSIllP48
SOUTH, MANGE 2S EAST,
COlliER COUNTY,
FLORIDA. ' .
PetltlonCU.2007-AR- :
I~~mm/~:!
lerp'rlse ,Ren t.a.earl' ap-,
plltant l!Ild _.....
B.UtI"" . 'COJIdIt onol
s:~tfo~f~or,:f'rD:
rentalcat' ~,wlthin
-4
"lUll ,.1,. 1"I<!<Il!-1
~~~ SUI.1t mJ~~~J=
151 'TOw~ 4tI South.
C.~i
mlnlstrator prior, to pre-
sentation of tat agenda
Item to be Ii ressed.
Individual spq r$ will
be 'limited 005" minutes
on any -Ite:m. The selec-
tion of an Individual ,to
~~~~~':or lr:'e~Og~
nlzed b~ the Chair, a
spokes'Peu~n for a
~y~o~jn!~~
ut6s to speak OM'an
Item.
17A
persons_ wIshing to
have written :or graphiC
,m:t=E' 'hl1i\~
aU )n4$l' 'frt,lt said
material a , knUm of 3
flor :0' the re-
[,"I.t lithe .
'I In " case, written ma.
t.r~, , Intended to be
,;.co " d b the
:'lfhal,', be su~mltt~
the, approprflte County
" ,,:",1'0
Staff a rnttrIImum of sev-
'" d~tlor ,to the
f:..'lNined'l'rf''':l'.i::
tlons before the Board
wlH become a perm..
nentpart of the record.
Any persori Wh'o.'l:tecld!
es to appeal a decision
of the Board will need a
record of the proceed-
Ings ptrtalnlng,thereto
and.ttUHe'or-e.,. m.y
need to ensure 'that a
verbatim record of the
proceedings Is made.
which record Includes
the fe$tlmony and evl-
deMe 'UfOft ',Which the
appei.11S: baled;
If y'ou are a person with
a dlsabHlty who needs
any accommodation In
order to participate li't
this oroceedlng; you are
.elttltledj; at no cost to
you, to the ptQvlilon of
certain Bulst.nce..
Ple.se contliltt-the Col-
lier County Facllltle$
Manageme.nt Depart"
ment, ,lo~ated at 3301
Tartrl.,.,l .'frall East,
BuUttlflO W, Naples,
~, Ida "',112, (239)1
' . is sted Hst ,
d's. rthehear
Imoa:! ' ~-V. avail ,e
I~, .the, ','My Coml1'llS.
$t9ners~, ~ ceo
!SOARD OF COUNTY
CGMMISSlONERS
C::OU.IER COUNTY,;
FlORlDA .
TOM HENNING, CHAIR-
~GHT E:'ll]feC'~,
CLERK , " ' "
~:cTee::- Pol~;"DeP.
(SIAL) , .'
Feb~ 10 No. 1685104
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to be forwarded to the Board Oftice only after the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
exce tion of the Chairman's si ature, draw a line throll h routin lines # I thrall h #4, com Jete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routin order
l?A
1.
t06
J.~.O,(
2.
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records
Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normal1y the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact statffor additional or missing
information. All original documents needing lhe Bee Chairman's signature arc to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item.)
Name of Primary Slaff Willie Brown Phone Number 213-2993
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 2/26/08 Agenda Item Number 17A
Approved bv the BCC
Type of Do cum en 1 Resolution VB At \" Number of Original I
Attached Documents Attached
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
1. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documen1s to be
signed by the Chairman, wilh 1he exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Altorney. This includes signa1ure pages from ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Altorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreem~/lts, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.)
2. All handwritte'n strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the Coun1y Attorney's X
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and 1he Clerk 10 the Board
3. The Chairman's signa1ure line dale has been enlered as the dale ofBCC approval of the X
document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a Iicable.
4. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's X
si ature and initials are re uired.
5. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip X
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee wi1hin a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines!
6. The document was approved by the BCC on 2/26/08 (enter date) and all X
changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document.
The Coun Attorue's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Ucable.
I: Forms! County Forms! Bee Formsl Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Origina19.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
MEMORANDUM
Date:
March 4, 2008
To:
Willie Brown, Principal Planner
Zoning and Land Development
From:
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Resolution 2008-45
Enclosed please find one copy of the document as referenced above
(Agenda Item #17 A), adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008.
If you should have any questions, please call 252-8411.
Thank you.
Enclosure
17 A
l? A
RESOLUTION NO. 08-~
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE
EST ABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW
AN AUTOMOBILE RENTAL AGENCY IN THE GENERAL
COMMERCIAL (C-4) ZONING DISTRICT AT 13560
TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH (SR 45), IN SECTION 15,
TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of
Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to
establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the
protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant there10 has adopted a Land Development Code
(Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among
which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing and has considered
the advisability of a Conditional Use for a automobile rental agency in the General Commercial
(C-4) Zoning District, pursuant to Land Development Code Section 2.04.03, Table 2, on the
property described in Exhibit "B", and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A") that
satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters
required by said regulations and in accordance with Section I 0.08.00.D of the Land
Development Code, as amended; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been gIven opportunity to be heard by this
Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier
County, Florida, that:
Petition CU-2007-AR-12384, filed by Enterprise Leasing Company d/b/a Enterprise
Rent-A-Car, with respect to the property described in Exhibit "B," attached hereto and
incorporated by reference herein, is hereby approved for a Conditional Use pursuant to Section
2.04.03, Table 2, of the Collier County Land Development Code in the General Commercial
(C-4) Zoning District, for an automobile rental agency in accordance with the Conceptual Site
Page I of2
l?A
Plan (Exhibit "C") and subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "D," attached hereto and
incorporated by reference herein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this
Board.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super-majority vote, this ~~-I4day of
Jihr-u.a(y
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGl-Il\,E~~CK, CLERK
~~~~1~
AU.t;;,., "~.-,',"- 1 Deputy Clerk
S 19f14ii;/:J~';dcl'I~'" ,.... {
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER !u:y, ORillA.
By: :.If;-
TOM HENNING, Chairman
A roved as to form
an leg] fficiency:
Jef y . Klatzkow
Chi s istant County Attorney
Exhibits (attached): A.
B.
C.
D.
Findings of Fact
Legal Description
Conceptual Site Plan
Conditions of Approval
Ilem#
/1fl
Agenda -z.lzlvlr'b
Date ~,
Page 2 of 2
17 A
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007-AR-12384
The following facts are found:
I, Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes V No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress 8s- egress
YesL No_
C, Affects neighboring properties in rela1ion to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
_ No affect or j// Affect mitigated by <text> lJo..J, l cYu,,)<:CI".yL-r ,
_Affect ca1illot be mitigated L oC-- (c;.'I.~L.c~ca"-
D. Compatibility with adjacent propelties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
Yes v/No
lr-'I 1'-'" ~),J-I'^') 1~'fJ'c"r-
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>. , _ ill
DATEd - I) -Or CHAIRMAN {/~L} ~2;,
EXHIBIT A
17A
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007-AR-12384
The following facts are found:
1. Sec1ion <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will
not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or
neighborhood because of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes I No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes II' No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
_ No affect or ; Affect mitigated by <text>
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
/
Yes V No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE:
/ /17 J(}f'
I I
MEMBER:))~r1/1.d--, '2-tl'i &hthU
17A
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007-AR-12384
The following facts are found:
1. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will no1 adversely affect the public interest and will
not adversely affect other property or uses in the same distric1 or
neighborhood because of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes.x.. No_
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed struc1ures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes K No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
-A- No affect or _ Affect mitigated by <text>
Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
YesL No
j
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with ipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE: (SBIv \l~OO'i?
MEMBER:
'6l?bn 5(~\\1-~"R-
I
\\
\
1 ?A
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2007-AR-12384
The following facts are found:
I. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will
not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or
neighborhood because of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes v'
No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adeqnate ingress & egress
Yes V No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
No affect or ~ Affect mitigated by <text>
Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
Yes V No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE: 1- 17- Cl f
MEMBER:
72~
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
l?A
CU-2007-AR-12384
The following facts are found:
1. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will
not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or
neighborhood because of:
A. Consistency with the Lanievelopment Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress /
Yes..i.- No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects: J
No affect or _ Affect mitigated by <text> J~~J&.,(llN'-
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within di7t
Yes No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, wi stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE:
MEMBER:
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
17A
CU-2007-AR-I2384
The following facts are found:
1. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will
not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or
neighborhood because of:
A.
Consistency with the Land7e elopmen1 Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes No
B.
Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
C.
Adequate ingress & egres~
Yes No
Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects;,-/
/ No affect or Affect mitigated by <text>
- -
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D.
Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within diS/:
Yes No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE: / ~ /1---- 0 r
>1/--1, /J
MEMBER' / iL----J /'
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
l?A
CU-2007-AR-12384
The following facts are found:
1. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will
not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or
neighborhood because of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes /NO
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
YesL~o_
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
~o affect or _ Affect mi1igated by <text>
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district;
Compatible use within district
YesL No_
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE: /-/7- c>.r-
~AC-Rr
V I C--.{ I eFT-I-,'
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
17A
CU-2007-AR-12384
The following facts are found:
1. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will
not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or
neighborhood because of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
yes.JL. No_
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes yJ No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
No affect or ~fect mitigated by <text>
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within di7
Yes No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached)
(should not) be recommended for approval <text>.
DATE: 1 J J1 J ~ ~
.
MEMBER: '-:::1 ~
.......
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ENTERPRISE RENTAL CAR
CU-2007-AR-12384
All that part ot Section l~, Town~htp 48 South, ~ange 2~
East. Collier County. florida. being more particularly
de5Cribed as follows:
COlMl.encinlJ at thl!! West 1/4 corner of ~aicl Section l~: thence
along th~ South line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section
15. South 89' )3' 40~ East 14. $9 teet to tlul Easterly right-
of-way line of U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail); thence alonq ~aid
.rlgh.t-of-way line and the Westerly line or that land a!l
dea~ribed In Official Records Book 1110. Page 1194. ot the
Public Record~ of Collier County, florida, Nott.n O. 31' 46"
West 33~.13 teet to the Point of BeqinninQ ot ~~e parcel
herein deserib~d:
thence contin:;e along said 1 tne, North O' 31' 46~ West
113.24 hat;
thence COr1tjnu& alonQ .said Hlte. Northerly 104.86 teet
t~~ arc of a circular curve con~ve to the West havinq
radi::u:I of 3.91'.12 feet "and being 3ubtended by ~ chord
be.ars North 1- 23' 45. West 104.86 teet;
thence leavinQ 5aid 1 ine, South 81J. JJ' 40" East J1l6.32
teet;
thence Sout.h
thence North
Beq i.nn1n9 of
a1009
.
which
O. 26. 20. West 238.02 teet;
89- 3)' 40. We"t 340.48 teet. to
the parcel herein de5cribed.
the Point of
EXHIBIT "B"
17 A
17 A ,I,~
D~-------,:;I
_......, -......-.--...::;-
r-Tl_'
, !
\ '
, 1
i,(-1~- '
'~II' il'-
'ill' '
.. .
, -,--
.U1! "
1
J .;:=t:."'~l~.q [ ; .....--... [J]" ..
~ _._ ~~'_I 01_ ,
..... ---~I.W.~WNn~- Q:.:
, .
i.l
I~
~
III
o
-
IX
III
I-
Z
III
(J
....
~
l::!
i
Im~
.J~
.il
I~
I t"
1
I
"\
.11
~-{\
':. \
'~\
,,~
;;
;;10.: tii
-< ;::>
u 0
,..J
-<
..,.f--....
ooZ",
~~g
- ..
a:~gr--
<."O~
,~Oll")
r--o...N__
O~ ..0
~til~~
I f-.~ u
;>Zf::'"
Ub.:Ic..C
;
'.
"
-- --"
,
1
~
~
l.rli,l~
1 l'
! 'I' !
,.",
1_1l1_ _
~ PI'
li ilii
~ ~r ~~~~
Ii ,hi ,'"
II' "" , nil
'. ! .
if ilill li!'
I Iii 11Hl
I !i.lI!!
J
hi , '
f~. .. t
",' ,II
\'" ~ H
~ (II. U
f I II 11 n
~q 1& if ~
i;!i Iii! I
alii I I.
. I '
l ~'~11
! i I .
r~~ '~ ~_. I
;~~~.. .
IT 'I
i H ~. ~lR I Ii g i, h
i " ;eJ ~~
I ~ ~ II . d ~ "
, , ' ~
~ 's i a \:.- .
! I Ii . , i,
L ' , , I
J2 t I ,
I:.. :' I ! t
--LL..-- , I 11 .
EXHIBIT "c"
'i) =, 'I
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Enterprise Rental Car CU
CU-2007-AR-12384
Conditions:
1. The existing landscape buffering to the rear (east) of the subject site, shall be
brought up to current LDC standards for a Type B Buffer where deficient.
2. The days of operation shall be limited to Monday through Saturday. The daily
hours of operation shall be limi1ed from 7:30a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The term
"operation" includes the on-premises washing and in1erior vacuuming of the
rental vehicles associated with this vehicle rental conditional use.
3. Any changes to 1he building's outside appearance, including but not limited to
paint colors, trim colors, and signage, shall be architecturally unified for the
entire building and site. All changes shall be consistent with the County's
architectural guidelines and site design requirements.
4. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this conditional use
approval, or major changes to the approved plan, shall require the submittal of
a new conditional use application, and shall comply with all applicable
County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Chapter
10.02.03, Site Development Plan (SDP) review and approval, of the Collier
County Land Development Code, Ordinance 04-41, as amended.
5. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the conceptual she plan,
identified as "Sunrise Center Conditional Use Conceptual Site Plan," prepared
by Phoenix Planning & Engineering, Inc., dated June 28, 1999. The site plan
noted is conceptual in nature for conditional use approval. The final design
must be in compliance wi1h all applicable federal, state and county laws and
regulations. The Department of Zoning and Land Development Review
Director may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of
buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by this conditional use, so
long as these minor changes remain consistent with all applicable
developmen1 standards.
6. There shall be no amplified sound of any kind or nature emitted from the
premises. This res1riction includes but is not limited to vehicle radios and
portable radios.
EXHIBIT D
COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA ,
REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
(i)
170
To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a:
~ Normallegat Advertisemen1
(Display Adv., location, etc.)
o Other:
**********************************************************************************************************
Originating Deptl Div: Engineering Services, Community Development & Environmental Services
Person: Stephen Higgins
Date: 1/31/2008
Petition No, (If none, give brief description): A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Peti1ioner: (Name & Address): La Playa Golf Club, LLC
116 Viking Way, Naples, Florida 34110
Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separa1e sheet)
Jim Carr, Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc.
7400 Tamiami Trail North, Naples, Florida 34108
Hearing before X BCC BZA Other
Requested Hearing date: (Based on advertisement appearing 20 days before hearing) February 26, 2008
Newspaper(s) 10 be used: (Complete only if important):
~ Naples Daily News
o 01her
o Legally Required
Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: See Resolution
Companion peti1ion(s), ifany & proposed hearing date: nla
Does Peti1ion Fee include advertising cost? 0 Yes ~ No If Yes, wha1 accoun1 shoutd be charged for advertising costs:
131-138327-649100
.'
County Engineer
-=3 i JAV oP--
Date
List Attachments:
Executive Summary -Copy
Resolution with exhibits - Copy
DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS
A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one coy and obtain Division Head approval before
submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request
for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute
copies:
o County Manager agenda file: to
Clerk's Office
o Requesting Division
o Original
8. 01her hearings: Ini1iating Division head 10 approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file.
***********************************************************************************************************
FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE 9,Nk v,:',..,W
Date Received: ~ Date of Public hearing:
2-/ 2lt.?~ Dale Advertised: dMOb
+
7-/t+/Cb
RESOLUTION NO. 08-_
178
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PETITION
AVESMT-2006-AR-10754, DISCLAIMING, RENOUNCING AND
VACATING THE COUNTY'S AND THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN A
25 FOOT WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER THE SOUTH AND
EAST 25 FEET OF THE NORTH % OF THE NORTHWEST Y. OF
THE NORTHWEST Y. OF THE SOUTHWEST Y. OF SECTION 24,
TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, ORIGINALLY
CREATED AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 2693
PAGES 3215 AND 3216, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND NOW FURTHER DESCRIBED IN THE
ATTACHED EXHIBIT 'A', AND ACCEPTING A REPLACEMENT
DRAINAGE EASEMENT, ALSO SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED
EXHIBIT 'A', IN PLACE OF THE VACATED EASEMENT.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 125.01 and 125.37, Florida Statutes, Petitioner,
La Playa Golf Club, LLC, has requested the vacation of a 25 foot wide drainage
easement over the south and east 25 feet of the north % of the northwest y., of the
northwest y., of the southwest y., of Section 24, Township 48 South, Range 25 East
having been originally created and recorded in the Official Record Book 2693 pages
3215 and 3216 of the Public Records Collier County, Florida, and depicted in Exhibit
'A'; and
WHEREAS, in conjunction with, and as part of Petitioner's request, Petitioner
has offered for dedication an alternate 20 foot wide drainage easement as a
replacement easement, attached hereto and also depicted in Exhibit 'A', in place of the
vacated easement; and
WHEREAS, the Board has this day held a public hearing to consider the
Petitioner's request, and notice of said public hearing to vacate was given as required
by law; and
WHEREAS, the granting of the Petitioner's request will not adversely affect the
ownership or right of convenient access of the property owners; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the County's interest in the
25 foot drainage easement as specifically described in Exhibit 'A' is hereby vacated,
extinguished, renounced and disclaimed, and this action is declared to be in the Public's
interest and for the Public's benefit.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County hereby accepts
the dedication of the replacement drainage easement attached hereto and shown on
Exhibit 'A'.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Clerk to the Board is
hereby directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution in the Official Records of
Collier County, Florida.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same,
this day of , 2008.
DATE:
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form and legal
sufficie
''(3)><
lD~' (') "C m
....rren
....~->3:
~"-l-<-1
",N-<)>l
....0 '"
_0 G')O
001 00
.......0 ,...Q)
~ -n:i>
o 3:;:0
00 .......~
o :::0
Z....
-101
m....
Z
>;:0
Zm
C1<
moo
'"
o
c
m
....
-
to
-
o
ClO
Yj
~
~
" .~
~ i.i.
\1!iI
m "
0 ~
R
," :rtl
c' m
D
~ 0
Q
"1
" ~
N
.
" ~ Ui'
"
'" ~ '"
'"
l'i!J d
0
It;; .:
i~ ...
.
:~ ~
'"
~
io
'"
...;
~ ~
i:!l i:!l
o 0
Z Z
'" ...
I ...
'" I
'" ...
I 0
'" I
" 0
co
I
~ ~g
~ r;l~
'" ""'0
Iii
~ ~'"
~ ~i
10: iliJi
... ...
'" ",0
- oZ
.... -'"
o (3P:'
~ ...z
. ",0
-~
iil
!;;
~
o
011
2!
lD
~o
~
50' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
AND UTILITY EASEMENT
1
I
I
1
I
1---1
-1COfTIf')
Os;;!~Ol
m~l""I"'T1
", ",0
<p..,)1T10
>OJZ-I
C1~-10
,... ,..;;0
r;l"O"'~
o>-aZ
"",>
rr1::o~
"'0
",.
-;0
",.
17.8-
CYPRESS WAY --
(NOO1lB'3B"W) (330.42')
-ltofTIN
O~>Ol
lD"'~'"
", ",0
<l'JfTlO
>O':lZ-l
nlO-Io
>.!A,..;;o
M-U(/l~
o>"'l)z
"",>
1"'1::o~
f:39
-;0
",.
~
~
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
I
(~
I
(--
j C5fJ
)
I /
_Jj
J
Ii
~_...--------~
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I L'1iI
--t------;; ~------
z I ]oriel
m I ;\!P'
u1 j g~
~ 1 :'8
"\ 1 ~u... ~'\
e I j;~ \2;
1 ~)~
en ''1 i~
en I ~~.
t" I tlJ~
.5 I ~g
-1- ..~,II1f-----
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-----1
I
I
1
-0 I
(fJ 0 Z ;:0 I
0 I
0 " 0 -0 I
C :;:0 0 1
---1---1 ---1 (f)
II I fT1
:E[11 0
~
[11z'-...., N
(fJON 0
---1:;:0
~---10 0
'-....,I" ;:0
-J>..:E )>
[11---1 Z
O(fJI )>
"---1[11 G)
fT1
(fJ~Z fT1
[11"-...,0
O-J>..:;:O )>
---1 ---1 (f)
fT1
OOI ;;::
z":E fT1
-1[11 Z
N I(fJ -l
-J>.. [11---1
I ~
-J>.. '-....,
CXJ -J>..
I
N
()l
........
~m
><
:x:
OJ
~=i
cB
@
@
\i @
'I
\
I ;0;0
f--- ~~~
I ~JT1
I ",>
I ~~
I
L____________
1
.....L__
1
I I
L___________L_________________________~-
I
1
(SOO'05'3B"E) (330.BB')
I
M:~,D,li:SQil:q1 :!i:llS!lJ!'A!lJ!'!t~
-~PLAni60K32~p-AGES 22 & 2~ 1-'
-,
I
I
I
@
15' ORAINAGE ANO
---LANOSCAPE EASEMENT
178"~ .~
'" '"
~ ~
'" u;
- (5 (f)() 0'" "())>
0
z z co "I Oor
0 ")> COZ rrl rrr
co - C "'0 '--'" '" rr
- IZ 0-,"
I I -< OZ rrl)> :ErrlI
'" "0 0- rrlO
., - '"~ '" (f)"')>
0 :u rrlr
I I (f)- ,"Z Z'" .. ()-i 0
0 ~CO OI 0" rrl
..., 0 )> 00
'" 0 0)> "'rrl C)> (f)
Z'" rrl<:;: '"'" Z'" 0
I )> Ir '"
;:: )>co )>. ~-< '"'"
n nE; (f) rrrl (f)'" .-< "
~ ~~~..-_.".. -'-'~""""-'-"~'-'" rrl'" (f)'" 0 :::!
~~ ~ ;::(j) ,"!O " " 0
:::=Zh>'-"- r
'" !;2z rrl(f) _0 O(f) Z
'" Zo .......0
" '" ZO '"C "'rrl 0
"''' -0
"'" rrl (f))> ..." 0," "
~ '" rrlCO )>'" O~ )>-
",n "'''' 0 "
'" >'" (f)C Zrrl "'" COZ ;0
'" tIlt;; Z 0" rrl 0
I<: "0 '"0 -'" "
'" ~::J r)> ",rrl I" Z... 0
Z )>01 rrlrrl rrl G).
.... "'0 (f)'" '" (f)
Zz Zrrl ;::'" rrl
.... Z '"0 (f)I 0
.., Orrl 00
'" 0 rrl- "'"
0 ;;J'" :u ",Z 0 C ;o:E 0
I<: (f)() ,"r ,"Z rrlZ ;0
O~ Y' -)> IO (f) ~
- I<:n ;:: )> Oz ~~ "I
~ Z Zo )>- Z
~~ 0 (f) (f)I ;0" )>
.... ... 0;:: '" :::!... 01
'"
0 ...." <D r "a ~....... OOl rrl
)> C
~~ 0 Z '" .......'" rrl
'" ;orrl ... r(f)
~ 0 )>0 )>
rrl O~ (f)
"'''' (f) 00 ",C rrl
'1<: 0;0 " r,"
C -<.I ;::
'" '" "'r '" rrl
Z (f)I
.... < Orrl ~rrl 0", Z
rrl (f) rrl)> '"
-< .'-? Oz (f)z
0 (f)0 Sl0
'"
(f) rrl'" [jjrrl
0'"
,"I rrl",
-:E O(j)
Orrl
Z(f) )>rrl
",'" (f))>
(f)
="'~ .'"
.......
...
(f),","
rrlII
orrlrrl
=1Z[Tl
00)>
Z",(f)
",,","
...I",
- - :E (j) 0
fi" ~ '"tI ......... ~ - --l[rio rrl
~ 0 (f)
g CII E! CJ ......... " 0'"0
n It ;- ......... ~ ~~" 0
"c tII ......... .... '"
'~~~....~ 0 (f).......rrl "
o ~ g... .., I",rrl :::!
- '" 0
~o~. ~ l;'l '" "0
~g':1:; ~ Z '" ~"~ Z
"',,~" c::: tI:l 0 n 0
~.g'sz 1>:1 t:: ::J'1:l ~ CXl:tO ~"
0'" (f)rrl," 00
c: Egg t::' :;d zo", "tl o I
0.... ;J > PI' n",~[::l ~ CZrrl "';0
t:l g'~' C') '"0 ",)>
ftg~~ O~rn~ Z ~I:::o (/) "'-
E- "'n <DZ
....":= 0 ,"0
.' . ;oIC "')>
o;~[ g ~ gj ~ ~~ >-3 .01
)>:E'" rrl
~'6. . q ZrrlI "
!; ~ n", " > G)~tv 0rrl
o~" 0 )>
~":;' '" ~ ~1il t"" rrl (j) "'(f)
r:tJ N,O "'rrl
..~~ - ~...~[tl ""l c::: ~;::
=~~ g (j)...0 "'rrl
. co '" ~
'0 Co "'- n fTlo'l ~z
l:~~ . ;:l"'''''1:l t"" < )>,,'" '"
~ .." 00~::J c::: trl (f) '" ........
lo i!l~ 0 :-l--l-f '"
" z t:l:l ><: IO 0
. -'" > "'0 0"''''
~:: 0 co
. ~ ",I<:.., t"" '"
~;'i " "' "- '" t"" O(f)," ~
0 " 0 ~~ rOI <
""~~"'Il '" Q. - n CCI"Tl
0 ~ '" ",," )> :J:
H g ~ 0" 0
""- ... '" ;oIZ )> m
n.. 11 '" :Eo '"
'iH:iiE 0 " 0 0"';0 '" ~::j
ClClIII:ICl '" '" '" '" O(f)," 0
"'........- 0 ~ '" C'"I r->
1~!3; 0
'" '" z~
I I 1 I > '".......I
~==~ '" ~-< .Jlo. ~
....
dl......c.II "'0'"
- "'''' -0 "- "- r."o
'" ore.> ~ C '" ~ ."
"'N 0 "'
":'l:::o "'- '<ii' :E .D' 0
-, " :J ~
- - :>>
""'"
.. t:l ~
...,
178
This Instrument prepared by:
G. Helen Athan, Esq.
Grant, Frtdkln. Pearson, Athan & Crown, P.A.
5551 R1dgewood Drive, Sulle 501
Naples, FL 34108
239-514-1000
A VESMT -2006-AR.1A107N~EN~~~~2
LAPLAYA GOLF M
FACILITY
Project: 2005040080 DUE: 1/9/08
Date: 12/21/07
Project:
PARCEL:
Folio No.:
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
, ~
~ASEMENT, made and entered into this ~ day of
, 2007, by LAPLAYA GOLF CLUB, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, whose mailing address is 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL
34105, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor"), to COLLIER COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiaml Trail East,
Naples, Florida 34112 (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee").
(Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" Include all' the parties
to this instrument and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and
assigns. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as the context requires.)
WIT N E SSE T H:
Grantor, for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable
consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and sells unto the Grantee, a
perpetual, exclusive drainage easement to enter upon and to Install and maintain
drainage structures and facilities, including but not limited to underground pipes, and
various types of water control structures under, upon and across the following
described lands located in Collier County, Florida, to wit:
See attached Exhibit "A" which is
incorporated herein by reference.
Subject to easements, restrictions, and reservations of record.
THIS IS NOT HOMESTEAD PROPERTY
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee together with the right to
enter upon said land and to place and/or excavate materials for the purpose of
178
constructing, operating, and maintaining drainage facilities thereon. The easement
granted herein shall constitute an easement running with the land and shall burden the
lands described above.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Grantor, for itself and its
successors and/or assigns, does hereby reserve the right to use said easement area for
the following purposes: (a) drainage of storm water from land owned by Grantor, which
land is adjacent to said easement area, and (b) a water management berm, back yard
swales and landscaping. Grantor acknowledges that it shall install root barriers for any
plants within 10 feet of any pipes in said easement area and that Grantor shall be liable
for and replace any improvements which Grantor has placed in said easement area and
which may be damaged by the Grantee in exercising its rights hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the
date and year first above written.
WITNESSES:
LAPLAYA GOLF CLUB, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
THE HALSTATT PARTNERSHIP,
a Florida General Partnership, as Managing Member
By: Katherine G. Sproul and Jennifer S. Sullivan, as
Trustees of the JULIET C. SPROUL TRUST under the
Will of BARRON COLLIER, JR., Deceased, and as
confirmed by change of Trustees dated January 1, 2002
and filed March 5, 2002, In Official Records Book 2992,
Page 2016 of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, PARTNER
C1~ U~wv
CAROLYNA. SHAW
Print Name of Witness
~d -:t3,uL<T?'-.' 3' 1'\)
KCl.:\"L 7'''0,(:''\'\0,-7 Zd-v
Print Name of Witness
O~()4ft~
CAROLYN A. SHAW
Print Nal"e o~ess "
~C/ v...--'(b.-~1-, s,'-/'1)
~Gl-k ~,)(lo.i1I() Z'..d-u
Print Name of Witness
17B~
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I::z. 'If, day of M ~
2007, by Katherine G. Sproul, as Trustee of the Juliet C. Sproul Trust under the Will of Barron Collier, Jr.,
Deceased, and as confirmed by change of Trustees dated January 1, 2002 and filed March 5, 2002, in
O.R. Book 2992, Page 2016 of the P.R. of Collier County, Florida, as a general partner of Halslatl
Partnership, as a Managing Member of LaPlaya Golf Club, LLC, who is personally known to me or who
has produced as identification.
~i<.~
Notary Public SUSAN L. MATURO
Print Name:
My Commission Expires: I () - '7 ~ 0 8
~~ SuNnLMoturo
. ~ . My Comrr'llSllOl"l 00343818
""I
....,<.. EIl;Qires0d0ber15.2008
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / ;.. ye.. day of IJ.R ~
2007, by Jennifer S. Sullivan, as Trustee of the Juliet C. Sproul Trust under the Will of Barron Collier, Jr.,
Deceased, and as confirmed by change of Trustees dated January 1, 2002 and filed March 5, 2002, in
O.R. Book 2992, Page 2016 of the P.R. of Collier County, Florida, as a general partner of Halslatl
Partnership, as a Managing Member of LaPlaya Golf Club, LLC, who is personally known to me or who
has produced as identification.' -
~ 'lllufivtJJ
Notary Public SUSAN L. MATURO
Print Name:
My Commission Expires: {{J ~ 15 -0 8
~~ SwalL-..
\, ~/' My CommoaIIOn 0ll343e1G
or ro; Expirea October 1 15. 2001
(]~a,AtUr'
CAROLYNA. SHAW
Print Name of Witness
Zr;\~~:'~ln~, :!rV
Print Name of Witness
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF COLLIER) -fl.-
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /~ day of ~ 2007, by
Paul J. Marinelli, Chief Executive Officer of The Halslall Partnership, as a Managing Member of LaPlaya
Golf Club, LLC, who is personally known to me or who has produced as
identification. - -
4't.~
N~tary Public SUSAN L MATURO
Print Name: .
My Commission Expires; l 0 -I '5"-0 B
~~ SuaorlLMoIuro
. ~ . My COI1lfI'16ssaon 00343818
'\" Of"./ Expires Qctobef 15.2008
--,-~-~,--,----,-----,-_._._._-----'-'-~..~----_.._----....-
17a
1Z8
Q~r-Atg<W/
LAPLAYA GOLF CLUB, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability mpany
CARO~YNA, SHAW
Print Name of Witness
/ -;) "
ff",Q , /~~ , ,'J? 1-< '7.-A',)
" ~
K.a.:~,(~-t>; s r" +v; 1.- n )
Print Name of Witness
By:
"
STATE OF FL
COUNTY OF Qiw"ld.)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this !7-..,.c.day of ~ 2007, by
Stephen J. Lockwood, as a Managing Member of LaPlaya Golf Club, LLC, ~ho is personally known to me
or who has produced as i~ rf? ~
Notary Public ~
Print Name: ~USAN L. MATURO
My Commission Expires: /0-/5 -o<a
'-"~ SuHo L MolufO
. ~ . My CommmlOl'l 00343816
\.~...J ExpicesQclober15.2008
LAPLAYA GOLF CLUB, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
{]~ (to ~w-
By: Stephen J. Lockwood & Company LLC
As A Managing Me r
CARO~YNA. SHAW _
'"tfB~~~~A
J :V"lli\:,(l' -N
Print Name of Witness
STATE OF fL )
COUNTY OF '"....wE1/... ) .,t.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of ~ 2007, by
Stephen J. Lockwood, as Managing Member of Stephen J. Lockwood & Company LLC, as a Managing
Member of LaPlaya Golf Club, LLC, who Is personally known to me or who has produced
as identification.
~t.~
,....~ SU....lMoluro
,'1.1' My Com"*,,,," OO".3lI1O
lSI f\i Expna 0cI0ber 15. 2008
Notary Public
Print Name: SUSAN L. MATURO
My Commission Expires: 10-15-08
~,_._._.._--_.~..._----~.
Acceptance by Grantee:
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK. ClerK
By:
Deputy ClerK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER aOUNTY. FLORIDA
TOM HENNING. CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
By:
J ight
As i tant County Attorney
178
~
!~
-<~
~I
plil
lii~
~i
r
o
(')
~
-
o
z
luST' lll~l
_...:..':... 17 B
3O\!ACRE:GOollU:T1tIlllPUIl
~"
,
il'!
" ,
"
,
I'
"
!'
, '
!" "'
i.,!,
1._,
,
~I
"
o
c
z
.,
-<
_ L ~I'"
i"!I!,L,~\ lii?,i "."
~ ~ ~It~ ~"I""
~ :;; -'- '^" ~ ~~
I ill r! l'
!il ~ .....____1<
i" ·
,I'
-I
[lj! ,
"'
i
,
!
,
~
~
AIR.PORT_PULLINGROAlJ
(C_R ~1)
~ii
"-, i' ll~ <
IPI.!i.! i!
,
,I '
!I! II -! i
. -I!
!'ft
"
I U
,
3:
l>
-C
O~O>lN01S!l,,^,l
I' i'
II ,~ "'
a~ II .Iii ~
"II "I
if "
"'
I,
5~
00
:!:iL
-m
00
z.,
il
'II!
"I"!
, "
- ,
,N1EF<5TA1E.l&
i"
-u
CWIlESS\\OQlS (:QI.F~~Il'lYCl..UB
lNTERSTATE.l~
II
",
""Wl1I<GmH
,
"
" i'
" 0' '::1~
,"
-I
I
!
,
!
,
"
"
'"0
;;00
a
b",
,.
~[;;
a
. II
I
--I.
/ NOTTOS<:1.l.E
.r
~.
;-<;:';
~~
CD
w~
.
~
n
p
no~~
~~
ZO~
O~~
OZ~
~~
".
....
~
.
~
8~
z~
o.
0'
~
.
~
en
-
-l ~
.
rr1 ~
~
z
.
z
3: 00
~~
l> "
.
QP
-C Cc
~w
,
~
.
~
~ " ~
.
r . ~
0 z ~ ~
c z ~ n c-
D < ~ 0
. n c 0
w . 0 ~ ~ 0'"
< ^ ~
~ . ~::j
0 0 0
~ 0 ~ ~ om
~ ~ ~ 0
~ z Z
0
~
~
--~.,---"-----"---
~I
=1
~....
Pd
liim
~~
..,
,.
e
,.
....
..
~
r-
o
n
l>
-f
-
o
z
178~
(~, S'fl 1ffl1W~!
.21
I'RA'lKBOOl.EVN\D
"
!
,
!
r
"'
"'
"
o
c
z
--;
-<
~
l>
-0
!II
2~-<
b
~
0"
0"
~2
Om
z'1
II
-!l!
"
-< IJ
.-
. !l
'~I
INTERSTATE .1~
i !I
, I
, !
.p i ~ '"'
<I i ... ~ '"
! '!
,
--I.. / -
~Or TO SCAlE
!!!
-"
~~i
"
INTERSTATE _ 7~
C_ESSWO/XlSGQl.FIlCOUNTRTQ.lIB
HUN~NGI""
I
h..
,.
~::l
~
-~
" II
I'
<.
,
~
"
c'
'1
"I
.'
"
"i::
~~
CQ
w~
>
~
p
<
.
,
o~
0,
z~
O'
O~
~
.
~
<'
.z
ZO
O~
~~
w
OC
Oz
z,
O~
O~
~
en
-
-f <,
ITI ~.
z,
"'
~.
z-<
..
~ z
00
l> ~~
.
-0 QP
Co
"W
,
~
>
~ ~
L ~
F 0 >
0 I ~
C Z < ~
0 z ~ 0
-< Z
I 0 ~ 0
w . C
-< , " <
0 ~ 0 " .
~ 0 ~ 0
i;; ~ i;; ~
i;; 0
z
0
~ ~
i;; 0
000
~=i
Om
z
l?B
AVESMT-2006-AR-10754 REV: 2
LAPLAYA GOLF MAINTENANCE
FACILITY
Project: 2005040080
Date: 12/21/07 DUE: 1/9/08
/l.;oo "'0"'1\<""
REYI[';gO LIST OF ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS
Falcon Ridge Neighborhood Association Inc.
PO Box 11 0207
Naples, FL 34108
Mr. Angelo Lucarelli
Ms. Gail Lucarelli
400 Euclid Drive
Naples, FL 34110
Sawgrass of Naples Residents Association Inc.
2338lmmokalee Road #137
Naples, FL 34110
Kes Ramsay
277 Sawgrass Court
Naples, FL 34110
Ms. Kathleen J. Thurston
273 Sawgrass ~O"C-I
Naples, FL 3411 0
Mr. Edwin G1asberg
269 Sawgrass Court
Naples, FL 34110
Koco Shkurti
Aksinja Shkurti
265 Sawgrass Court
Naples, FL 34110
Joseph R. Luteran
Karen L. Luteran
261 Sawgrass Court
Naples, FL341 10
LA PLAYA GOLF MAINTENANCE FACILITY
l?B
LIST OF ABUTTING AND OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE PROPOSED
VACATION
1. Epifanio, Joseph R
16 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 32383001008
2. Riddle, Dennis A & Sheryl A
18 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 32383000986
3. Escobar, Braulio & Adiela
20 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 32383000960
4. Short, Everett C & Donna J
22 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 32383000944
5. Tennent Sf., Andrew & Mary
24 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34lto
Folio No. 32383000928
6, Kerekes, Vandoran & Robin L.
26 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34lto
Folio No. 32383000902
7. Joyce, Thomas R & Audrey F
28 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 32383000889
8. Rice, Robert D & Joann
30 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 32383000863
9. Marrelli, Eraldo & Rosaria
32 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 32383000847
139 Marwood Place
Maple, Ontario L6A I - C4, Canada
17.
18.
19.
10.
Raymond, Chester M & JWle
34 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No, 32383000821
17r
11.
lvY-A<" 12-0.N\1',I::. t \C.rz.IST'j,JA ~P.N'I\\(ovA
'2.1 M~I>\ so~ OIZ-.
~f)(ple~ h. 3411O-1'3Z.z...
fe-lIt <\..lv. 5"-' '318Soc.-z.o'4-
12.
Pirrone, Elizabeth R & Angelo
25 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 341to
Folio No. 56318500]81
13.
Peterson, David W & Donna M
29 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 56318500165
14.
Biancaniello, Mino & Silvana
33 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 56318500149
15.
Mahoney, Sean
34 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 341 ] 0
Folio No. 56318500288
16.
Gentry, Norman & Kamila
30 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 56318500262
St. John, Sandra Jean
26 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 56318500246
Di Longo, George
22 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 56318500220
Zanetti et ux, Foster
221 Cypress Way
Unittol
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No, 72130040007
69 Beechwood Road
Oradell, NJ 07649
20.
Kasischke Tr, Carolyn M, Placke Jr., William H & Beth
221 Cypress Way
Unit 102
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 72130080009
27536 Big Bend Road
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
178
21. Arblaster, Earl Edgar
221 Cypress Way
Unit 103
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 72130120008
39 Green Briar Road
Alliston, Ontario L9R 1 ~ R6, Canada
22. Brubaker, Elizabeth
221 Cypress Way
Unit to4
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No, 72130160000
9764 Connecticut Street
Bonita Springs, FL 34135
23. Gray, Theodore M
221 Cypress Way
Unit to5
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 72130200009
1981 North Star Road
Columbus, OH 43212
24. Bayer, William A
221 Cypress Way
Unit 106
Naples, FL 3411 0
Folio No. 72130240001
48 Purnell Place
Manchester, CT 06040
25. Dublino Tr, George & Dub1ino, Marilyn
221 Cypress Way
Unit to7
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 72130280003
9400 Gulf Shore Drive
Naples, FL 34108
26. Wiles, G Christopher
221 Cypress Way
Unit 108
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 72130320002
27, Reed, Carol A l?B
221 Cypress Way
Unit 201
Naples, FL 341to
Folio No. 72130360004
28. Baggs, A R
22] Cypress Way
Unit 202
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 72130400003
29. Moulds, Clifford & Mabel
221 Cypress Way
Unit 203
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 72130440005
30. Putnam, Karlene K
221 Cypress Way
Unit 204
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 72130480007
1] 21 Gulf Shore Boulevard North
Naples, FL 34102
31. Reed, Phyllis A
221 Cypress Way
Unit 205
Naples, FL 34 I to
Folio No. 72130520006
32. Dunckley, Thomas W & Salley J
221 Cypress Way
Unit 206
Naples, FL 341 to
Folio No. 72130560008
33, Johnson, Nancy J
221 Cypress Way
Unit 207
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 72130600007
34. Pontiac National Bk Tr
221 Cypress Way
Unit 208
Naples, FL 34] 10
Folio No. 72130640009
408 Carol Court
Pontiac, IL 61764
35. Hicks, Troy Lee & Corene 178 'J>
333 Cypress Way
Unit 101
Naples, FL 341 10
Folio No. 25030040002
39 Hawthorne Road
Rolla, MO 6540 I
36. Roettele, Thomas P & Carol
333 Cypress Way
Unit 102
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 25030080004
37. Bryant Est, Una Rose
Keybank National Association Pr
333 Cypress Way
Unit 103
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 25030120003
4194 East Normandy Park Drive
Medina, OH 44256
38. Strother Tr, James & Margaret
333 Cypress Way
Unit to5
Naples, FL 341 10
Folio No. 25030 J 60005
1267 Mockingbird Lane
Sun Prairie, WI 53590
39, Coulson, James
333 Cypress Way
Unit to6
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 25030200004
40. Young, William E & Barbara L
333 Cypress Way
Unit 201
Naples, FL 341 10
Folio No. 25030240006
41. French, Kathryn 0
333 Cypress Way
Unit 202
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 25030280008
42. Poole Tr, Barbara E l?S
333 Cypress Way
Unit 203
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 25030320007
22286 Valley Oaks Drive
Beverly Hills, MI 48025
43. Lohman, Jack L
333 Cypress Way
Unit 204
Naples, FL 3411 0
Folio No. 25030360009
44. Hicks Tr, Doin E
333 Cypress Way
Unit 205
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 25030400008
5907 Alexander Lane
Deale, MD 20751
45. Johnson, Margaret J
215 Cypress Way East
UnitA-l
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000020
46, Caraway, Joann
215 Cypress Way East
UnitA-2
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000046
47, Vibral, Donald & Schmidt, Diane
21 5 Cypress Way East
UnitA-3
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000062
48. Giorango, Susan W
215 Cypress Way East
Unit B-1
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000088
542 Gunderson A venue
Oak Park, IL 60304
49. Hall. David E & Lana C
2 15 Cypress Way East
Unit B-2
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000101
50. Downing Tr, Fran S
215 Cypress Way East l?B
Unit B-3
Naples, FL 341to
Folio No. 60570000127
4702 Briar Patch Court
Indianapolis, IN 46250
51. Gerner, Franz-Josef & Bettina
215 Cypress Way East
UnitB-4
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000143
52, Orlea, Mildred L & Richard L
215 Cypress Way East
UnitB-5
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000169
53. Bonamarte, Anne M & Michael
215 Cypress Way East
UnitC-1
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000185
54. Thompson, Nancy & Geoffrey
215 Cypress Way East
UnitC-2
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000208
5652 Morgan Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55419
55. Kurland Tr, Joan E
215 Cypress Way East
Unit C-3
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000224
14325 Country Club Lane
Orland Park, IL 60462
56. Richman, Spencer & Richman Tr, Ellen J
215 Cypress Way East
UnitC-4
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000240
730 Tarpon Cove Drive
Apt. 201
Naples, FL 34110
57. Cabral, Yvonne & Gantzer, Jacqueline & Bleijendaal 178
215 Cypress Way East
Unit C-5
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000266
58. Gauthier, Joyce Kenwood
215 Cypress Way East
UnitC-6
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000282
59. Benn, John M
215 Cypress Way East
UnitC-7
Naples, FL 341 to
Folio No. 60570000305
60. Smith, James F & Emma Jean
215 Cypress Way East
Unit C-8
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000321
61. Thies, Vera
215 Cypress Way East
UnitC-9
Naples, FL 341to
Folio No. 60570000347
62. Beers Est, Marion S
C/O Diane M Dennis Pr
215 Cypress Way East
UnitC-IO
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000363
63. Tlivigno, Frances
215 Cypress Way East
UnitC-11
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000389
64. Matish, Phillip A & Brenda J
2 I 5 Cypress Way East
UnitC-12
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000402
2865 Loreto Drive
Willoughby, OH 44094
65. Ward, Charles J & Joan M 178
215 Cypress Way East
UnitD-1
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000428
to405 San Luis Lane
Orland Park, IL 60467
66, O'Donnell, David J & Roberta M
215 Cypress Way East
Unit 0-2
Naples, FL 341to
Folio No. 60570000444
14344 Country Club Lane
Apt. L
Orland Park, I L 60462
67. Brah1er, Robert B & Marilyn J
2 I 5 Cypress Way East
Unit 0-3
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000460
2006 Tanglewood Circle
Louisville, OH 44641
68, McDonald, James E & Carolyn J
2 15 Cypress Way East
Unit 0-4
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000486
700 Diamond Circle
Apt. 708
Naples, FL 34110
69. Abbott, James W
2 I 5 Cypress Way East
Unit 0-5
Naples, FL 34lto
Folio No. 60570000509
4023 136"' Lane NE
Ham Lake, MN 55304
70. Trombetti, Pamfilo A & Delores
21 5 Cypress Way East
Unit A-2
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000046
134 Eden Crest Drive
Cranston, RI 02920
71. Capone, Natalina 17B~
215 Cypress Way East
Unit D-7
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000541
1043 Albany Court
Naples, FL 34105
72. Nelson, Wanda
2 15 Cypress Way East
Unit 0-8
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No 60570000567
73, Kurland, Thomas E & Elaine J
215 Cypress Way East
UnitD-9
Naples, FL 341to
Folio No. 60570000583
12520 Lucille Lane
Palos Park, 1L 60464
74, Roberts, Joanne & Di1a11a, Joseph
215 Cypress Way East
UnitD-10
Naples, FL 341 to
Folio No. 60570000606
7462 Emilia Lane
Naples, FL 34114
75. Bryant, Angela L
2 15 Cypress Way East
UnitD-11
Naples, FL 341 to
Folio No. 60570000622
76. Plescia, Joseph & Karen E
2]5 Cypress Way East
UnitD-12
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000648
7 North McConnell A venue
Bayport, NY 11705
77. Raynor, Lorene C
2 15 Cypress Way East
UnitE-1
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000664
PO Box 188
Boothbay, ME 04537
78.
Kravec, Stephen J & Deborah E
215 Cypress Way East
UnitE-2
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000680
l?B
79. Sitarz, Shirley
215 Cypress Way East
Unit E-3
Naples, FL 34110
Folio No. 60570000703
14900 Summit Place Circle
Naples, FL 34119
February 4, 2008
Attn: Legals
Naples Daily News
1075 Central Avenue
Naples, Florida 34102
Re: A VESMT 2006-AR-I0754
Dear Legals:
Please advertise the above referenced notice on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and again on Sunday, February 17, 2008. Kindly send the Affidavit of
Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Teresa Polaski,
Deputy Clerk
Account No. 131-138327-649100
l7B
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
110
Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 26,
2008 in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier
County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples,
Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The title of the
proposed Resolution is as follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PETITION AVESMT-2006-AR-10754,
DISCLAIMING, RENOUNCING AND VACATING THE COUNTY'S AND THE PUBLIC'S
INTEREST IN A 25 FOOT WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER THE SOUTH AND
EAST 25 FEET OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 48
SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, ORIGINALLY CREATED AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL
RECORD BOOK 2693, PAGES 3215 AND 3216, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND NOW FURTHER DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED
EXHIBIT 'A', AND ACCEPTING A REPLACEMENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT, ALSO
SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 'A', IN PLACE OF THE VACATED
EASEMENT.
NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must
register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of
the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be
limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual
to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If
recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or
organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item.
Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in
the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3
weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case,
written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be
submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days
prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations
before the Board will become a permanent part of the record.
Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need
a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may
need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation
in order to participate in this proceeding; you are entitled, at
no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please
contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department,
located at 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Building W, Naples, Florida
34112, (239) 252-8380. Assisted listening devices for the hearing
impaired are available in the County Commissioners' Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
118
TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)
"'--~.._~.._-,..>>-
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-t:Otlp-ty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY ctOURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST
,
P.O. BOX 413044 ,
NAPLES, FLORI DA'11l 0 1-3044
...
l?B
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 4,2008
La Playa Golf Club, LLC
116 Viking Way
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~~~lL~t>sf2\ ~K
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.cIerk.collier.fl.us
~-~'_.,--_._~_._-------_._---_._---._.__,,_'"'__."'__~.,M___,__,.,~,~__,.,,________
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerklalclerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-eoupty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE
3301 TAM lAM I 1\RAIL E~ST
P.O, BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLORlDA~4101-30~4
..
li'S
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 4,2008
Jim Carr
Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc.
7400 Tamiami Trail North
Naples, FL 34108
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
~IGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
, 'U0i Cc PCLcL~(Ll \ c
eresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Website- www.clerk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Emai1-collierclerk(ti)c1erk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-eOWlty of Collier
t_--.
CLERK OF THE CIRCUlT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY Q:OURT~OUSE
330 J T AMIAMI TRAIL EAST
,
P.O. BOt 413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA '~~IOJ-30~4
..
.L?B~
Clerk of Court
Accountan
Audita
Custodian of County Fund:
February 5,2008
Falcon Ridge Neighborhood
Association, Inc.
P.O. Box 110207
Naples, FL 34108
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner;
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
Yau are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~( ft'GS(LI ~C
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.coIlier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-coIliercIerk(il)clerk.coIlier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
'eD~nty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTfIOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI T(R,AIL EAST
P.O. BOX413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA:f4IOl-3044
...
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Mr. Angelo Lucarelli &
Ms. Gail Lucarelli
400 Euclid Drive
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner;
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~ fltr ~
' . '. . .~ 5(27 . 0>
eresa Polas i, Deputy Ie?R-
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(tVclerk.collier.t1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
___mm___. __ ('.] .
'-eounty of CollIer
L.- ",
CLERK OF THE CIRCUJT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY d:OURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST
,
P.O. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA '1'1101-3044
...
1 ? 8 14
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Sawgrass of Naples Residents
Association, Inc.
2338 Immokalee Road #137
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DW GHT E. BROCK, CLERK
\ " . ,/1/1,'1 U.' '\r
' J1-'CC"-.'j't d_______
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.cIerk.collier.fl.us
Fax-(239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerklalclerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
~ounty. of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTBOUSE
3301 TAMlAMI ~RA1L EAST
P.O. BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA~4tol-3044
*
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Kes Ramsay
277 Sawgrass Court
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
Ml4f1!tYfJ-;4llk._
Teresa Polaski, cleguty Cfe"rk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.clerk.collier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerkrtiJclerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-eounty of Collier
1;_.
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURT,?OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST
P.O. Bot 413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA 441 0 1-3044
*
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Ms. Kathleen J. Thurston
273 Sawgrass Court
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~('/(t fJ(~{YJ1\ :) ~
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.colIier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email- colIierclerklalclerk.colIier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
~Dun, ty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY (COURTFlOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI ~RAIL E!\ST
P.O. BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA _Htol-3044
..
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Mr. Edwin Glasberg
269 Sawgrass Court
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~' fJ..' .,'If \
(.L1-&t. /ff-{jl,~(L1 Ac.
eresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk '.
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
W cbsitc- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerklalclerk.coIlier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
.eounty ofC'o'l1ier
,--
CLERK OF THE CI~CU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY CCOURT,?OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST
"
P.O. BO:X 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA:t1tol-30f4
...
17B~~
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Koco & Aksinja Shkurti
265 Sawgrass Court
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
(\ 0lU~{ fl,~~L. '~<-..
\T~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646 Fax- (239) 775-2755
Website- www.c1erk.collier.t1.us Email-collierclerklalclerk.collier.t1.us
Dwight E, Brock
Clerk of Courts
-County of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU,T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY C:OURTllOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAsT
,
P.O. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101-3044
*"
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Joseph R. & Karen L. Luteran
261 Sawgrass Court
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~7 f(ltl~f:; !jc'
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk ~.
Enclosure
. '^~.n._._~_ H__..._~.". "_"~"'_"'_~_'~
".."......--... .._.~,..._-~--~------,--_..,,'-~~.,.
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.colIier.t1.us
Fax-(239) 775.2755
Email-colIiercIerk(a)Clerk.colIier.t1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-eounty of Collier
L_, ,
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY C'OURTaOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI 1(RAIL Ei\ST
P.O. BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLORlDAl1101.3044
...
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Joseph R Epifanio
16 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner;
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
a;?~~ t/~t(z'( ~2..--
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646 Fax- (239) 775-2755
Wcbsite- www.c1erk.collier.t1.us Email-collierclerklalclerk.collier.t1.us
-----.__.,_,~_.___._._....__.'"0..._. "_."_,...'m,..~__,__.,,_.,.u_.,,.~.......,",,,_~,____~__.~,~",,__,_._.__._,~_
Dwight E. Brock
Clcrk of Courts
~ounty of Collier
c_
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI 1(RAlL EAST
PO. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA ''',4101-3044
..
178'
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Dennis A. & Sheryl A. Riddle
18 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
(~LL~f'( &'8;k'1 ~------
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
..._^_. d,_.,.__.,~.__~... ., ',_.. .~__',_____._____...
Phonc- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.t1.us
Fax-(239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(ti)c1erk.collier.t1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eoupty of COllier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY C;:OURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI1(RAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA:f1l01-3044
..
l?8
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Braulio & Adiela Escobar
20 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT -2006-AR-l 0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
(\ ~, , . IQ~ Ijt{a~t[{ >~
~ki, Deputy Clerk .
Enclosure
".,.-.--. ---~.._-.~.-_..,.",-"_.,~.,'~-------
---"-""'-~"._--'~"----"'-'-'--"
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.t1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-colliercIerklalcIerk.collier.t1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
{~ounty of Collier
I.. ~"
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COlJ'NTY C;:OURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI ~RAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDAJ4l01-3044
-,'
l?B
Clerk of COUl1S
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Everett C. & Donna J. Short
22 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
(\ \) LLU~ P6({tS@, j~ ~
\~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.t1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-colliercIerklalclerk.collier.t1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
.eounty of Collier
L.
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY <.tOURT,?OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI 1\RAIL EAST
P.O. BO~ 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA '.Htol-3044
*
17t
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Andrew & Mary Tennent, Sf.
24 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
I~~ ftl(iS(t~ ~C>~_.
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.cIerk.collier.t1.us
-~-'~--'~-'--_."~'----'-'--'- _'__'~'-"_~''''_--_''''.'~-_.__''_-~,.q-_..,-,-- ......_--~.,-_. '.--....__...__...__...'w__..___........_""_.
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerklalcIerk.collier.t1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-eounty of Collier
t___
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY <I:OURTt.IOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST
"
P.O. BO}( 413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA'_HI01-3044
-$-
l?B
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Vandoran & Robin L. Kerekes
26 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner;
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing,
Sincerely,
:JDWIGHT E'jfBROCK, CL::RK
( . ~_ ' -,(j).81;... k
esa Pol as i, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Websitc- www.c1erk.collier.t1.us
Fax-(239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(aJclerk.collier.t1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-County of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY C:OURTfloUSE
\
3301 TAMIAMI T,RAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA .~,~ 1 0 1-3044
..
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Thomas R. & Audrey F. Joyce
28 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~ ji"tC,'J \-
\,_ · t.C~ K'C4--61~ TC~
esa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.cIerk.collier.t1.us
Fax-(239) 775-2755
Email-collierc1erk(ti)c1erk.collier.t1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
.eounty of Collier
,-
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE
\
330 I T AMIAMJ TRAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044
NAPLES. FLORIDA 3'41 0 1-3044
..
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Robert D. & loann Rice
30 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
(\ V LUC!\.eCCJ-St~)~
\~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
---~----~_._--_.,.- ........ -_...._~...- _..,.._._'-_.,--_.,----_."..,_...._~-,_._..'^_.,--"_.,--..-
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax-(239) 775-2755
Email-collierc1erklalclerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eounty of Collier
\--.. -
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST
"
P.O. BOt 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA~410l.3044
..Ji}
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Chester M. & June Raymond
34 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
e::lLU_..AJJ"--- 'f6{{C~(1l ~C_
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732.2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax-(239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(ti)c1erk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eOll;Ilty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY <!'OURT~OUSE
330 I T AMI AMI T,RAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA3:~IOI-30fl4
*
17 B '"
Clcrk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Elizabeth & Angelo Pirrone
25 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
(' 'J. UG,,- Pc;(Q_;:;f~\ he
l ~~Iaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
W cbsitc- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
EmaiJ- collierclerkia!c1erk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
.eounty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURT!lOUSE
3301 TAMIAM11(RAIL EAsT
P.O. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORlDAr410l-3044
..:i~
'1
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
David & Donna Peterson
29 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~ 1 ULtc:c_ ~J~e.( ~
\~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
--~---'._--,-,._._..._.__..._.._-,~...__...-,",,--_.._-'-'-~""~.'-""-'---~"~"~'--
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Website- www.cIerk.collier.fl.us
Fax-(239) 775-2755
Emai1-collierclerk(wcIerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eounty of Collier
\,,~ -
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTaOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAJL Ej~ST
"
P.O, BOX 413044.
NAPLES. FLORIDA ~\l101-3044
*'
"~B
- /'.'"
.' ;.'
"
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Mino & Silvana Biancaniello
33 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26,2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
C' rJ ilLW2" Pc-tO--S1L( ~~,.
"~ Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646 Fax- (239) 775-2755
Website- www.clerk.collier.fl.us Email-collierclerk(ti).c1erk.collier.ll.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eOll!1ty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTfJOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI T\RAIL EAST
P.O. 80~ 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA.r41 0 1-3044
*
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Lukas Ramik & Kristyna Ramikova
21 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
C' I) LL-lL-0- {i:Ul${fL{ ~
\<\:Th~:~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax-(239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerklalclerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eounty of Collier
~,~
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAMl ~R,AlL EAST
P.O BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA~410l-3044
*'
17B
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Sean Mahoney
34 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner;
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
r\ /}, lULZ ~(tLHL( ))(j
~olaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732.2646 Fax- (239) 775-2755
Website- www.clerk.collier.fl.us Email- collierclerklalclerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
~ounty of Collier
l_ -^
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY <COURT BOUSE
330 I T AMIAMI T,RAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA .~~ 1 0 1-30fl4
*'
17
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Barbara Poole, Tr
333 Cypress Way
Unit 203
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~ to Llll,.('" ~ttCL~Z tbL.
\~esa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.clerk.coIlier.fl.us
Fax-(239) 775-2755
Email-coIlierclerk(ti)clerk.coIlier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-et}unty of Collier
L__." _.,
CLERK OF THE CIRCD~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURT!JOUSE
3301 TAM1AMI l1R,A1L EAsT
P.O. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA-t1l()I-30~4
..
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Barbara Poole, Tr
333 Cypress Way
Unit 203
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~ (J t I I \.Q ~cio-YJZ\ ~
\~Iaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Web site- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
-------'~---'_..~."._'-"._'-----"-_._~--~-_.._-----_._._.--~ -, -'---"---.-"-
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(a)c1erk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
.eounty of Collier
L_-
CLERK OF THE CI~CU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY <WURTlIOUSE
330 I T AMIAM11(RAIL EAsT
P.O, BOt 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA~~tol-30f4
*'
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Stephen & Deborah Kravec
215 Cypress Way East
Unit E-2
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT -2006-AR-l 0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
Yau are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
(\ /J I I , I P", ~~1L\bc
~'~ski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.clerk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(ti)clerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
--eounty of Collier
1,>-
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST
,
P.O. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA '.H 101-3044
*
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Angela Bryant
215 Cypress Way East
UnitD-11
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner;
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
(\ '1~ ~r:t()-~-t,~t')~l~--
~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Website- www.clerk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerklalclerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eountyof Collier
\.._- ,
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY C:OURT!IOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST
,
P.O. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA~4tol-3044
*'
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Wanda Nelson
215 Cypress Way East
Unit 0-8
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
Yau are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
f\ /) V--CV7{ HS{(LVIC l h-c
~ Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Web site- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(ti)c1erk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
.eounty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CI~CUfT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTfjlOUSE
330 I T AMIAMI T,RAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLOR!DA.f~101-30~4
..
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Frances Trivigno
215 Cypress Way East
UnitC-11
Naples, FL 341 J 0
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
(\ rJ l)uJ.((Rfa.Q:tl)~
~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
__.^_ _. ...._._..'__.0_~"..__,.___..___,__._~
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Website- www.cIerk.coIlier.l1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-coIlierclerklalclerk.coIlier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-eounty of Collier
c~
CLERK OF THE CIRCUJT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY <tOURT~OUSE
3301 T AMIAMI T,~AIL EAST
P.O, BOt 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA~~101-30~4
*
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Marion S. Beers, Est
c/o Diane M. Dennis, Pr
215 Cypress Way East
Unit C-10
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
(\ D lUi€t f)o(g.Q(z( ;.~
~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.cIerk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierc1erklalcIerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
'-eounty of Collier
I,n.' .
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY <tOURTnOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI1([{AIL EAsT
P.O. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044
...
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Vera Thies
215 Cypress Way East
Unit C-9
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
\' 1 ~LR -p6(gg~,- ~L
l..~~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
._.._--"---_.-.~."-."------,"--_._--~.,.-..._.._-"-_.- ---~,-~-,-,,-_.__..._--~,_._._.,.._- - ---"-'~~-'
Phone-(239) 732-2646
W cbsite- www.clerk.colIier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-colIierclerk(tiIc1erk.colIier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
~-ountyof Collier
\.;--'" '
CLERK OF THE CIRCUfT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY CCOURTflOUSE
3301 TAM1AMI rR,A1L E,{ST
P.O. BO~ 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA!41Ol-30~4
.
171
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
James & Emma Jean Smith
215 Cypress Way East
Unit C-8
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
(\ V Ill1e'A. ~((/?tc~ ~(
~e\fa' Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
--_.,.~-~,_._~---.-
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.coIlier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-coIlierclerklalclerk.coIlier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eounty of CbUier
'c_
CLE~o?JE;~~f;~~~gu~?URT
3301 TAM1AMI T,R,AIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101-3044
.~~
178
'I
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
John M. Benn
215 Cypress Way East
Unit C-7
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26,2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
Yau are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
" D Dll IGGHHIT E. BROCK',,~~E,RK
~LC~?cL~'1ll'\ bC__
'. Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerklalc1erk.collier.fl.us
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Website- www.clerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-eounty of Collier
1.-
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY (WURT~OUSE
3301 TAM1AMI ~R,AIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA~4tol-30~4
..
17 B&;J
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Joyce Kenwood Gauthier
215 Cypress Way East
UnitC-6
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
Yau are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
("\ 'J, . tc,,- D.. (~~}l ~ .
~aski, b~uty Clerk - ~.
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerklalclerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eounty of Collier
\~.-
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY <WURT!;IOUSE
3301 TAM1AM11;RAlL E.'\ST
P.O BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORlDA3~tol-3044
..
17E
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Yvonne Cabral &
Jacqueline & Bleijendaal Gantzer
215 Cypress Way East
UnitC-5
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
/\S-l~ ~GG~~tzA ~,.
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
----.---.__~~__,__~."'___~_~___,_.'~_~_____,.h_...... .. _.'_._.._.,__._.._._"___w__.""_,._.__.___.
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Web site- www.clerk.collier.ll.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerklalclerk.colIier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
'eountyof Collier
\,_.
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY (WURTl!OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI T,RAIL EAST
P.O. BOt 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDAWOl.30~4
...
17B~
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Ann & Michael Bonamarte
215 Cypress Way East
UnitC-I
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
r~Rb\~k~<--
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Web site- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerklalcIerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
{:o~ty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY tOURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI rRA1L EAST
P.O. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA '~4101-3044
...
!.
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Mildred & Richard Orlea
215 Cypress Way East
UnitB-5
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
Yau are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~{c&k~~<---
sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
W cbsite- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerklalcIerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
.--eount,y of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY <tOURTl.IOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAsT
,
P.O, BOX413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA'r~tol-3044
*'
178f
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Franz-Josef & Bettina Gerner
215 Cypress Way East
Unit B-4
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~-tl ~YLLl ~G
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Website- www.cIerk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email- collierclerklalcIerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
e-ounty of Collier
L'. ,
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY <!:OURTl'iOUSE
330 I T AMI AMI TRAIL EAsT
,
P,O. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA~41 0] -3044
..
178 .~
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
David & Lana Hall
215 Cypress Way East
Unit B-2
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~ I() I LU..~_ Pt0-~t.A lx
\~ Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email- collierclerklalclerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
, -
eounty of Collier
l:___.
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY <!:OURTBOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI '[(RAIL EAsT
P.O BOX 413044"
NAPLES, FLORIDA '~~ 1 0 1-3044
*"
178'1Si
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Donald Vibral and Diane Schmidt
215 Cypress Way East
UnitA-3
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-10754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
(' 0, . . '12" ~c.Co-Xl~ p~
\--~Iaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.clerk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email- collierc1erklalclerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-eounty of Collier
\,."
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY C::OURT~OUSE
3301 TAMlAMI TRAIL EAST
,
P.O, Bot 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA '~~101-3044
*'
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Joann Caraway
215 Cypress Way East
UnitA-2
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
_ IJ 'D.
c~'^- ~t:0-~S~, :r~
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-colliercIerklalclerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
.-eountyofCollier
L...,
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURT110USE
3301 TAMIAMI ~RAIL E.~ST
P.O, BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA~4tol-3044
*
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
~argaretJ.Johnson
215 Cypress Way East
Unit A-I
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~ ,.
: "-"-^-Nc,-._\t.t~~~(c--\'D'<---"
. eresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax-(239) 775-2755
Email-colliercIerkia!cIerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
.eounty of Collier
\,-
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAM11(R,AIL EAST
P.O. BO:X 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA~4l01-3044
*
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Jack Lohman
333 Cypress Way
Unit 204
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
Yau are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~}..Q,-~~~ iJ~
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email- collierclerk(ti)c1erk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eounty of Collier
\;-- ,
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTI:'IOUSE
330 I T AMIAMI 1(j\AIL E,,{,ST
P.O. BO:1( 413044.
NAPLES. FLORIDA:r~tol-30f14
*'
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Kathryn French
333 Cypress Way
Unit 202
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
"' () L,,-~ \t>c \~k\~L
\,~ Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Websitc- www.clerk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierc1erk(tiiclerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-eounty of Collier
\~~ .
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAM! f,RAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA:f~101-30'l4
*'
1 78 tli.
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
William & Barbara Young
333 Cypress Way
Unit 201
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
Yau are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
o 1 LeUa.. ~J't(2/( J c
\'-~~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax-(239) 775.2755
Email-collierclerklalclerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
~oupty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL Ej~ST
"
P.O, BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA'14101-30;i4
*
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
James Coulson
333 Cypress Way
Unit 106
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~ JlA.J~~,)..~~12r'~~_
\~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Web sitc- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(mclerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
--eounty of Collier
1::_. _
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI T,RAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044 ,
NAPLES, FLORIDA $101-3044
*'
l78
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Thomas & Carol Roettele
333 Cypress Way
Unit 102
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
.~~tll.h" \)C(o.(.{pt'~ C.___
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.cIerk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-colliercIerklalclerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eounty of Collier
L-_
CLERK OF THE CIRCU1T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURT!IOUSE
3301 TAMlAMI T,RAIL E~ST
P.O BOX413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101-30f4
*
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Nancy J. Johnson
221 Cypress Way
Unit 207
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
( il U-llC,- ~&R%h~)~
~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Web site- www.cIerk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-colliercIerklalcIerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e-ounty of Collier
t~_
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE
3301 T AM1AMI "(,RAIL EAST
P.O BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORlDAl110l-3044
..
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Thomas & Salley Dunck1ey
221 Cypress Way
Unit 206
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
C fJ ~C?^'- ?c.~C{:4..-~tL\~
'. ~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Website- www.clerk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(il:clerk.collier.t1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-eounty of Collier
\~- -
CLERK OF THE CIRCUJT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY ~:OURT,?OUSE
330 I T AMIAMI T,RAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101-3()44
4-
,
178
Clcrk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Phyllis A. Reed
221 Cypress Way
Unit 205
Naples, FL 34110
.
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-t0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
r-. <J LU-~L ~D(crih~k
\~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Web site- www.clerk.coIlier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-coIlierclerkialclerk.coIlier.n.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'tHmty of Collier
,,-
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY (WURT~lOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST
"
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101-30~4
-$-
278 "
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Clifford & Mabel Moulds
221 Cypress Way
Unit 203
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~ <J LLUe< PCUSIZ,--:X~
\ ~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Web site- www.c1erk.collier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'ounty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY <tOURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI "(~[L EAST
P.O. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA '~41O 1-3044
-$-
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
AR Baggs
221 Cypress Way
Unit 202
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~~S42L'D-~
eresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.coIlier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
.eounty o..f Collier
l_ ,
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY Q:OURT(IOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI T,~IL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA '34101-3044
-$-
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Carol A. Reed
221 Cypress Way
Unit 201
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
(" 'f)l{ We. ~t~ll21'L{ ~
\~~saj:>olaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.l1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-coIlierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'CH.l;Ilty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI WIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044
...
_c, '~
!. /8
rf.:, t/ "
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Christopher G. Wiles
221 Cypress Way
Unit 108
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
~ '~
t ~ \
\" L\'-c~~ t ,G-?rL.. ,"
"" eresa Polaski, Deputy ~ler~
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.coIlier.l1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.coIlier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'Oll;11ty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY ~OURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST
"
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA '~41 0 1-3044
-$-
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
George Di Longo
22 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
" ()lLtJ[L P[.lo..~1;.1. ~
~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.coIlier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.coIlier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eounty of Collier
1.-
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTtlOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI l(RAIL EAST
P.O BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA~1101,3044
-$-
178 .
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Sandra Jean St. John
26 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008,
You are invited to attend this public hearing,
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
\' 0,. ~\... 8~~tQ\4''k-
"~laski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732,2646
Website- www.cIerk.collier.l1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-coIliercIerk(a)Clerk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'ounty of Collier
t_, .,
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY ltOURT(IOUSE
3301 TAM1AMI l(~IL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA r4101,30~4
-$-
_t..
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Norman & Kamila Gentry
30 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing,
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~ ;1l~ ~o-trJ.- ){2-{ ':D~,
'-~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Website- www.clerk.collier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-colIierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'ounty of Collier
\'---" ,
CLERK OF THE CIRCUJT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY crOURT(IOUSE
3301 TAM1AMI TcRA.IL Ej\ST
P.O. BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA~1101,3044
-$-
J.78
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Shirley Sitarz
215 Cypress Way East
Unit E-3
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
(\ 1/ ~~6~ ~Y;t4 (;K-._
\~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
----~._..,-. .. _.....,~._,_~.__.m'__ _~.__.______._,_._"'_.__"_ "w._._ ........ .~.",. ,_'""_._.",, . .
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.coIlier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.coIlier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eour-ty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTtlOUSE
, \
3301 TAMIAMI '(RAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA',H 10 1-3044
4-
17B
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Lorene Raynor
215 Cypress Way East
Unit E-I
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
~DWIGHT E, BRO~CK' CLE~K
, ( . ':'\ "-;>
WG\', . (lQv~{1.\. r,,"------,
, sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.cIerk.collier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(Q)cIerk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eOll;11ty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY ltOURTBOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI l(~IL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101,3044
~~
ire
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Natalina Capone
215 Cypress Way East
UnitD,7
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008,
You are invited to attend this public hearing,
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~ \. \\\ ( (,I..,;{Z}<-
, ' '--L",.c\.. \'()~!- D . \. k....
-. eresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775,2755
Email-colliercIerk(Q)cIerk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
~Oll;11ty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY C:OURTaOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI "(~IL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA '~~10I,3044
-$-
J
171
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Joseph & Karen Plescia
215 Cypress Way East
UnitD,l2
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing,
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
i\ 1\ ~.. ~t-{o--~t0S.,~,-
\,~ Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Web site- www.cIerk.collier.f1.us
Fax-(239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(Q)cIerk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'ounty of Collier
l__
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY ltOURTtlOUSE
3301 T AMIAMI TRAIL EAST
,
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA'f41 0 1-3044
-$-
l7a
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Joanne Roberts & Joseph Dilalla
215 Cypress Way East
Unit D-IO
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT -2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
(\ IJC'-.,lJve\ ~L~L~V1'D(-::'-,-
l~~ Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.cIerk.coIlier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email.coIlierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eounty of Collier
'-~
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI l(RAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA .:t4I01,3044
-$-
17B
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Thomas & Elaine Kurland
215 Cypress Way East
Unit D-9
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
Yau are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
c{QLUb.~ \\W%ft-.'0~m
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.f1.us
Fax-(239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'ounty of Collier
\,--
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTijOUSE
3301 T AMIAMI ~RAIL EAST
P.O. BO~ 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101-3044
-$-
17ai~
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Pamfilo & Delores Trombetti
215 Cypress Way East
UnitA-2
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing,
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
~U-LW. PCJ__~2c \C,
, Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Web site- www.clerk.collier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-colIierclerk(ti:c1erk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eountYof Collier
1.__-... ,
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTBOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST
,
P.O. 80'<413044,
NAPLES, FLORlDA~41 0 1-30~4
-$-
17a
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
James Abbott
215 Cypress Way East
Unit D-5
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
(\ A l~UC(_ YCCfc~tL(~/
'~~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.clerk.collier.f1.us
Fax, (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(wclerk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eounty of COllier
1.--' _
CLERK OF THE CIRCU1T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY Q:OURT,?OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI l(~IL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA '~4101,30~4
-$-
17a
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
James & Carolyn McDonald
215 Cypress Way East
Unit D-4
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing,
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
(\ ~ Lu.LLC PLla9Z{'K-
\ ~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Website- www.clerk.collier.f1.us
Fax-(239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eounty of Collier
L,~
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY t1:0URTHOUSE
330 I T AMIAM1 TRAIL EAST
,
P.O. BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA '3'1101,3044
-$-
17a
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Robert & Marilyn Brahaler
215 Cypress Way East
UnitD,3
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
r!;:;;l;~~l<
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.l1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email- colliercIerk(il;c1erk.collier.l1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'ounty of Collier
\.:-- - ,
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTtlOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI l(RAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDAW01,3044
-$-
178 ~
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
David & Roberta O'Donnell
215 Cypress Way East
UnitD-2
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008,
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
D~l::~ BRP6~~~~~
~a Pol""k;,' Depoty CI"k
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732,2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierc1erk(Q).cIerk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'ounty of Collier
1.___.. ,
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI T,~IL EAST
P,O. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044
-$-
17a
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Charles & Joan Ward
215 Cypress Way East
UnitD-l
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008,
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
r:-Il. L~, '\\)Cc~~LL b~-
\~~sa Polaski, 6eputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646 Fax- (239) 775-2755
Web site- www.clerk.collier.f1.us Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eounty of Collier
,--
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST
,
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDAr41 0 1-3044
.
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Phillip & Brenda Matish
215 Cypress Way East
UnitC,12
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
Yau are invited to attend this public hearing,
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
G20LUC"'., fo(9-,~V\1 C___
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email.collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'ounty of Collier
,-
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI l(~IL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA:WOI,3044
... .
178~
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Spencer Richman
Ellen J. Richman, Tr
215 Cypress Way East
Unit C-4
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008,
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
(' tJ. . . 'h ~JD-~~~~
"~i, DeputyClerk
Enclosure
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Website- www.cIerk.coIlier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-coIlierclerk(Q)cIerk.coIlier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eOU[1ty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY tOURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAMI T,RAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDAJ4101-3044
-$-
178
C Icrk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of Coullty Funds
February 5, 2008
Joall E, Kurland, Tr
215 Cypress Way East
Unit C-3
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
Yau are invited to attend this public hearing,
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~ ~)"l - 0/; -\. be
: ~\0~ ~G\..C.lL-NL "-.........._.
". esa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732,2646
Web site- www.c1erk.collier.f1.us
Fax-(239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(tl:c1erk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eounty of Collier
"
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY <COURT!IOUSE
3301 TAM1AMI '(RAIL E;\ST
P.O. BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLORIDAJ410l,3044
fr
l?B
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Nancy & Geoffrey Thompson
215 Cypress Way East
UnitC,2
Naples. FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
Yau are invited to attend this public hearing,
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
~LLLLO-. ~o{a81Ll L
Teresa PolaskI, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.colIier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-colIierclerk(ti:c1erk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eounty of Collier
1,-
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE
3301 TAlvIIAMI '(RAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101,3044
~Jt"
l?p
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Fran Downing, Tr
215 Cypress Way East
Unit B-3
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
c-\J. ~.~k-~L\,)L
}~ Polaski, 1~puty Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Web site- www.cIerk.collier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775,2755
Email-collierclerk(wclerk.collier.t1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eounty of Collier
\--.-
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTtlOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL Ef~ST
,
P.o. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDAr4101,30~4
1~
I?"
;
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Susan W. Giorango
215 Cypress Way East
Unit B-1
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing,
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
~ (J t~~ i1:~1.~L[ )C_
I ~a Polaski, ~uty Clerk
Enclosure
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Website- www.clerk.colIier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-colIierclerk(li)c1erk.colIier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'ounty of Collier
,_
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTaOUSE
3301 T AMIAMI TRAIL El~ST
,
P.O. BOX 413044 <
NAPLES, FLORIDA '~4101-3044
-$-
118
Clerk of Courts
Aecountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Doin E. Hicks, Tr
333 Cypress Way
Unit 205
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
l.lnd Sunday, February 17, 2008,
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
!~t1t'(SLku ( ~...~
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Website- www.clerk.collier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'ounty of Collier
t_'. .
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY Q:OURT~OUSE
3301 TAM1AMI TRAIL EAST
PO BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101,307l4
-$-
118
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
James & Margaret Strother, Tr
333 Cypress Way
Unit 105
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008,
Yau are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
- (). U. \Q,-- ~~~L-t'l) c...._
r'~a POlaski, Iiguty Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Web site- www.clerk.collier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email- collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'ounty of Collier
t__
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURT!JOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST
,
P,O. BOX 413044.
NAPLES, FLORIDA'~4101-3044
-$-
17/"
,-
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Una Rosa Bryant, Est
Keybank National Association Pr
333 Cypress Way, Unit 103
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
"'~-1fL0L1 ~~..
'~sr=i;laski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Website, www.c1erk.collier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775,2755
Email-colIierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'o~ty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE
330 I TAMIAMI TRAIL EA,ST
"
P.O. BOX 413044 ,
NAPLES, FLORIDA 44101,3044
-$-
l?n
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Troy Lee & Corene Hicks
333 Cypress Way
Unit 101
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing,
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
o :)~. Vcs~~~\.b <--..
'\~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone, (239) 732-2646
Web site- www.clerk.collier.f1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(ii)c1erk.collier.f1.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'ounty of C:()llier
l_
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY C:OURTtlOUSE
330 I T AMIAMI TRAIL EAST
,
P.O. BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLORlDA '~41OI,3044
...
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Pontiac National Bk Tr
221 Cypress Way
Unit 208
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing,
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
Qto-~0-1~/
Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
_'___"_c_..___~_"__.___._,_,."," '-~'~'-___'_ -. '-'_'___'_* _._._ .____~____"..__,._.._"___...*.....__._,__~,__"._._"_.._._ .., '." _....,..~._.~~_w__.________....__.,.~_
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-coIlierclerk(iVclerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eounty of Collier
L_
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY Q:OURT~OUSE
3301 T AMIAMI TRAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044..
NAPLES, FLORIDA~4IOI,30~4
-$-
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Karlene K. Putnam
221 Cypress Way
Unit 204
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008,
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
f\ <J LLL\(A ~~~
\. ~esa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Website- www.cIerk.coIIier.l1.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-coIIiercIerk((iJcIerk.coIIier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'ountyof Collier
1:-- .
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE
3301 TAMIAM[ TRAIL E.~ST
P.O. BOX 413044.
!\APLES, FLORIDA ~4101,3044
..
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
George Dublino, Tr & Marilyn
Dublino
221 Cypress Way, Unit 107
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT -2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing,
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
\:~L~, jtb{O~;~/1 /Y-
"'-~esa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
"__~__'____.__._...____._._..M_.______.___.~_.
Phone-(239) 732,2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email- collierclerk(a;cIerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'Oll;11ty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY ltOURTtlOUSE
330 I T AMIAMI r,RAIL E;\ST
P.O, BOX 413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101,30~4
-$-
l?S
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
William A. Bayer
221 Cypress Way
Unit 106
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
'" iJ LLClliL Pc Lt1S;Jz i \ /
("'~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Web site- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-colIierclerk(tl)c1erk.colIier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'Oll;11ty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE
3301 TAMIAM1 TRAIL E3.ST
,
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101,3044
.
l?S
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Theodore M. Gray
221 Cypress Way
Unit 105
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008,
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
~ ()U-'Ll(~ &~~':p<---
\'--~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Web site- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax-(239) 775-2755
Email-colliercIerk(tl;cIerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'nunty of Collier
1._.. I
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY (WURTaOUSE
\
3301 T AMIAMI l(RAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA~41 0 1,3044
-$-
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Elizabeth Brubaker
221 Cypress Way
Unit 104
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008,
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
C' ;)'J~ fi&.~2k/t ~ ~
\-~aski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone, (239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email.colliercIerk(iVclerk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'mmty of Collier
,-
CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE
3301 TAMIAM1 T,RAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA ~4101-3044
.
17B
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Earl Edgar Arblaster
221 Cypress Way
Unit 103
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008,
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
~DtIGHT E, BR~~ CLE~
I"~ 'L~~e"^- ruc6S6~ ~Z/
eresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
Phone-(239) 732-2646
Website- www.c1erk.colIier.fl.us
Fax-(239) 775-2755
Email-collierc1erk(Q)c1erk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
-e'ounty of Collier
I.--
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY ltOURT80USE
3301 TAMIAMI l(RAIL EAST
P.O. BOX 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA'~4101-3044
-$-
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Carolyn Kasischkle, Tr
William & Beth Placke, Jr.
221 Cypress Way, Unit 102
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17,2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
\' (U LLt~ )j)Z(a~{L ,'D<---
\'~a Polaski, tJeputy Clerk
Enclosure
~---'--"'-'~~"._----'._--'-"~-"--
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Web site- www.clerk.collier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eounty of Collier
'..
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY COURTaOUSE
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST
P.O. BO~413044
NAPLES, FLORIDA '~41O 1-3044
-$-
17B
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5, 2008
Foster Zanetti, et ux
221 Cypress Way
Unit 101
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing.
Sincerely,
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
\ 0. llV'- Pu{cLgl~t .~~
\~ Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
",.-..--." _.____'.0_.._".' ._"'"~"._" ',._._,,,,__ ,,_ , . ._....~m__.".._...... ,,_~_ ,_,,_,_ __"N^_"',,__~_____"~_._,,__
Phone- (239) 732-2646
Web site- www.c1erk.coIlier.fl.us
Fax- (239) 775-2755
Email-coIlierclerkla)c1erk.coIlier.fl.us
Dwight E. Brock
Clerk of Courts
eOUflty of Collier
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COLLIER COUNTY ltouRTaoUSE
3301 TAMIAMI l(RAIL EAST
P.O. BO;:< 413044,
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101,3044
-$-
178
Clerk of Courts
Accountant
Auditor
Custodian of County Funds
February 5,2008
Eraldo & Rosaria MaITeUi
32 Heritage Way
Naples, FL 34110
Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754
Dear Petitioner:
Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as
indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition
will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008
and Sunday, February 17, 2008.
You are invited to attend this public hearing,
Sincerely,
cZIWGHTE.BROCK,CLERK
f) /' 'f~ \
, , '--C!o..... I-Ci_{~~~ IS~
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure
-~-._~._'-----" -~--"~<...__..._.-" -..--.---- _.~
Phone- (239) 732-2646 Fax- (239) 775-2755
Web site- www.cIerk.collier.fl.us Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.n.us
---~~._--
02/11/2008 00:18
23g2534703
foreign AOOOWlt trumber
001230
Ad#
1667825
Ad Net COllt
~;603 .24
COLLl:l!:~ GOV COMl'LIill( IlLOG J
Name (primary)
Company (primaryl
Street I (Primary) ,'.(). TAMIAMJ: TRAIL Iii
city (Primary) NAPLJ:S
State (Pr~nary) FL
ZIP (Primaryl 39112
phone (primary) i23:') 774-44H
Claus code
0,l20 - N"t: oe of Me"tinq
StArt Date
0://10/201)8
0:2/17f~OOII
Stop Date
prepayment Am.OU~:: Sf) . I 0
Ad Sales Rep. 716 - SlOoky J. RUey
width 1
Pepth 147
Nella: e.
~Blle. HIARING
Notl/;. Isl'I.reby IIj~el'l
that'" ..... of COIrtY
<:ommilllo"ers of' eor.
ne; County \Al1Il held a
p'ublk:: hearin. on Tue.t-
Av.,""",,,,,'~21lO1"
the loardr(loM. 3rt:!
,lqO~. Admlnllt.ra.tiMl
Ulldi"G. coln.rCol,ll'ltY
Government C.rrttt.
3301 ElIIt Tam!"",l Tr.~.
Napl... fl(;\l'lda. Thl
1J1,..ting will bllGln .t
'1GliI J..M;: TI'Ie tltl. Dttlw
DfO.Pi- Rellolutlon hi:
as tol OWl:
A RESOLUTION OF lHE
IOARD O' COUNTY
~ M1S$IONl!.S OF
e '~IR COUNT'Y
'l I A. A"ATlNe Td
TI AVQMH_
.6."-1 ,OISCLAIPJI..e.
REN U CING AND VA-
CATINO THI COUNTY'S
"ND TH! IJ08!'IC'S. IN.
T1iRIST I N A S FeOT
WID' DOA'NA I !AS'.
MINT OVIR THE. SOUTH
A.MD lAST 2J 'UT 01'
TH! N"!liRlI' OF TH!
NORTHW V" Of' TttE
NOR1HW V4 OF TH!
.eUTH V' Of .oe-
TlON 24, TOW~HIP 4
~ror.~oo..,'(,.~..I~n,
AND II~DlD It.! MI-
CIAl.. CORD 1001(
21S11, P is 321S AND
321.. I. ...."e AE.
COFlOS r;OLL.I~R
cOUNTY. ..CRIDA. AND
NOW FURTHER DE-
SeR"ED IN THE AT.
T~~H'D ..HI.,T 'A',
ANAl ACCIPT'~'iIA lit!.
~~fJ~\!,J,!'.....~~OJ
~1oI8~N ON 'tHE iT.
TACH!. EXHI"'T "'t IN
PlAt! m'TH VACA ED
fA5UdINT.
NO"": All Persons
wl:llhlno to ,"",konan;i
AOIIndAItIIm",u.tIWf;JIi:.
CLASS
PAGE 08
178
02/11/2008 00:18
lOr w~h the COUnty 0;-
mlnlstratOI' frior to pry-
!entatlon 0 the l1CM'nCta.
tlm to be ..ddriueel.
Indl,'du" ._or. win
bl lmlrid to5 mlnlolteS
I)n ~ Item. 'The $tlfe'
tlo" Of In Inl:UviduAI to
speak on b,half of an
grllanlutlor) Of i1roup 15
enl;ouraged. If r.,oo,,-
niUI!f by tnl! ch.lr, a
Sl)oktsper$on for a
grOl.l~ or oralnlutlon
may b. allOffed 10 mln~
utes to 5~ta.k on tin
_.
'.rsol'l.:: wiShing t,'
haw wrfft.~ o~ graphH:
materhal.. inClltICled ,n
the Board _Mila PllCk:.
et. mUlt submit said
mawrlal .. minimum of 3
we,klll prIor to thl r.-
sP.etl~ PUb~r.iIftng.
In 8/l'Y eNe. n ma-
"';j4t. rmendl:! to be
""'" ....~.......
sha' bl! $u miUed to
the appropr Cou!'lty
$td'. minimum of it\"
Ill" da~1 prior tQ th.
gUtlllenearlng. All mOl-
tr6~~ =rbnt~~=:'~
will "COI'l'lO: . perma.
nMt: part; of IM~.
An,; ~rson who CI.~id-
"'.~"I.d4K:i.i~n
.f1'. d will __ .
l"COO I) the prc!lMd'
inCl$ "rtalnlng thereto
__'" _n...
to tn.u,. tnat . \'/,rba,
til'l'l rtcord oftn. pro.
~~'i'''''-.cJ"yjhlct
"dUd.$ tne tes-
timony ~~d tvlde"ce
tf~:l' c tl'ie .,~.I
KYOI.l..,.lptlrsonwttJ't
. .".."Ily wh, no,",
8I"S accommodation In
arller tf.\f.1) iClpt,b! In
this 'IlrO 1,* you ....
ontl'l4I h. no .~.".
~~tl'~ :::f;r.~~r
PIOU. camaot the COl.
lieI' Co~nt~ I'actlltlll!'5
Manalemont c.~.rt-
lfltnt. located at nOl
~.roie.ml Tr.1I laJt.
""?i'n!:! w. Nap''',
arl ]4U2, (aJI) 25Z-
SJiO. .lI.ttttclli3teni"!
l:!fil~s for t". tltll'in
Impal,.d are i1.v.irGb
in t". (:our,ty cammls.
iiMll'S' Qil'fteto.
BOUD O. ~OUNTV
COM..'......!1lS
COlLlEIII ~OUNTY.
OLOAIDA
TOld l1!NNINQ.
CIofAIAMAN
il'''''' .. 1AOCl<,
'~..... ""_,,
~-
~. ,11 No1167&:2S
2392534783
CLASS
PAGE 09
178
Teresa L. Polaski
~17B
.
To:
Subject:
legals@naplesnews,com
A VESMT ,2006-AR-1 0754
Attachments:
AVESMT 2006,AR-10754,doc; AVESMT 2006-AR-10754.doc
Legals,
Please advertise the following on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and again on Sunday, February 17, 2008. Thanks
~
AVESMT AVESMT
j-AR'107S4.doc (28 j-AR'10754,doc (28
Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III
Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners
Minutes and Records Department
239-252-B411
(T eresa.Po las ki@collierclerk.com)
1
178
Teresa L. Polaski
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
postmaster@collierclerk.com
Tuesday, February 05, 2008 10:34 AM
Teresa L. Polaski
Delivery Status Notification (Relay)
Attachments:
ATT691949,txt; AVESMT-2006,AR,10754
1':1
l;..J
B
A TT691949. txt A VE5MT ,2006'AR'1
(231 B) 0754
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested
delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination.
legals@naplesnews.com
FW: A VESMT ,2006-AR-l 0754
Page I of 1
17p
Teresa L. Polaski
From: Perrell, Pam [PPerrell@Naplesnews,com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 10:51 AM
To: Teresa L, Polaski
Subject: RE: AVESMT-2006,AR,10754
Yes, they got it. I was out. They tend not to confirm. Sorryl
Pam
From: Teresa L. Polaski [mailto:Teresa.Polaski@colliercierk.com]
Posted At: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:34 AM
Posted To: Legals - NDN
Conversation: AVESMT-2006-AR'l07S4
Subject: FW: AVESMT-2006'AR-I07S4
Just checking to see if you received this email yesterday.ldid not get an ok on it.
Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III
Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners
Minutes and Records Department
239-252-8411
(T eresa.Po laski@colllerclerk.com)
From: Teresa L. Polaski
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 10:34 AM
To: 'Iegals@naplesnews.com'
Subject: AVESMT-2006'AR'10754
Legals,
Please advertise the following on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and again on Sunday, February 17, 2008,
Thanks
<<AVESMT 2006,AR-10754,doc>> <<AVESMT 2006-AR-10754,doc>>
Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III
Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners
Minutes and Records Department
239-252,8411
(T eresa.Polaskl@collierclerk.com)
2/6/2008
Th.Th,
NAPLES DAILY :'IiEWS
Published Dati:
Naples. FLq 102
Affidavit of Publication
State of Florida
County of Collier
Before the undersigned they' serve as the authority. personally
appeared B, Lamb. who on oath says that they
serve as the ASSIstant Corporate Secreta", of the Naples Daily.
a daily newspaper published at Naples. in Collier County.
Florida: dlstrlbuled in Collier and Lee counties of Florida: that
the attached copy of the advertising. being a
PUBUC NOTICE'
in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE
was published in said newspaper 1 time in the issue
On Februa", 1)"',2008
.\lllant lilrthcr says that th~ said :\'lpks ])ail~- !\cws is a nc\\spap..:r
Puhlished at :\apks. in collier county, Florida and Ih<ll the said
n..:wspapcr has hcrdofor.:: b':"::11 continuously Pllolishcd in said Colli..::r
County. Florida~ distributed in Collier and Lee counti..::s of Florida,
.each day and has been entered as s..::cond class mail matter at the post
ollie..:: in !\aples, in said Collier Countv, Florida. for a period of 1
:-i.:ar nexl preceding the tirst publication ofthe attached copy or
advertisement~ and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor
promised any' person, tlrm or corporation any discount, rehate,
commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for
publieation in the said newspaper
Ij.~
( Signature of a ffia ut)
Sworn 10 and subscribed before me
This 17t". 200X
Da\ Of Fehruary 200R
NOTI,C,E OF
PUBUC~
N.t1'iI'l.lie,~~, it.."
thaI tho __countY
commtSislon.... . of. eor.
ner countywUl hold a
I<llI>t1F~'\l.R
r:~' ao,atd'r~"O'". ,3rd
Floot;'~dmltlIJt"'ttQT\
sulldlng,COlUer Cou~
.
,331) amI:
Na S., flor da.. lite
m.', ,,~t~Bt..!!, I>
~d~rtr,
~S:r,+:;' .
~. > OF TtlE
tl1:tlto6A\"ol
IL,LI' ~OUNTY.
, R/OAr TING TO
. ITlON A MToltW.
AR-10754., DISCLAIMING.
RENOUNCtNQAHO VA.
CAT'IN(; T-ME'CQUNTY'S
A,Y-D'lHE" pYBUC'S . tN-
TERUT iN A 2:5 FOOT
WIDE'DRAINAGE EASE-
': tI OV ~^T~E S~TH
IN It~
'NO WEST 114,01' TIlE
SOUTHWlSTiBlI4 F SEC.
TlON 2" T .,' tp 48
~' ,EAST.
o " , ATED
" . OFf'I-
CI L RECORD BOOK
26t!. PAGES321S AND
gg~tNTHE !i,IC RE-
C OS OF 0 lIER
U "FLORID. AND
NOW ,URTHER DE.
SamlBD IN THE AT-
T'.' '~EHI"IT 'A',
I. 'C, lNO A lIE'
P 'Ad DRAlNAOE
EAS . ENT ALSO
SHOWN ON tHE AT.
TAQ4t!D EXHIBIT . A', IN
~.TIIE VACATED
No.T!: All persons
INlshilHllQ .poal< on any
aeon<!( 11Im must reg",
, ter with the County. Ad.
_Istrator friar to pre-
sentation 0 theage(\da
He!J"'I1l , "", 'fit.. ,d.
1i'1a1.V'''' $p. .'.' win
1 bi- Ifrnttld . to' minutes
"OII""X_ -,
'tJon Of. an IAdtvldua' to
speak on, behalf of an
~"5..IS
'. . ". . ' . . J, r:ecoa-
~~~~. ~'.'
l.SPOk...er:$,On for a
aroup,' . or organl14tlon
may 'oe allotted 10 mIn-
utes to s'Peak on an
tl'I'l.,"~-,,,,,,,,,,.~_
C.\ \~ \\.1 I; CUI \ ~~~ 0..( C ,,,-, "ifr';:/iJ'-..- CHANEL A. MCDONALD
(Slgnalure of notary publIc) f.,W' ,~.\ Commission,DD650475
~. ' ..! Expires June 29 2011
Rr:1't\{' &ndedThruTroYFal~lrHI~rilfIQRllQP-3Bi-701g
FEt 59-257RJ27
17B
p.r.ono wr....~!i.'
have written C)I" . t
materlaJi1!'~1 fe. ,n
.the IIOlInJ a -
eumu.t S bmtt ..:ld
mattriaI a minimum Of 3
Wjeks PriM to the .'~~
ItYl\lUbll<heaet!,
m,lal,', n'3.1'r.
. ~.Id' y."" Bo
;' 11'" ulftnttted .
~,. . ~'I..ec.un~
i1lJtfa ml~ of leV-
_~~pays -prior to the
IWtlc'heaWnQ.' All ma- ,
erlalused in presenta-
tions 4:lefofe. the 'Board
will become a perma-
nent p~ 01 ~ ,..cord,
A'n!t:,.,' etson WhOr!1', . d-
estQ~ a . Ion
of the . .wll need a
record of t e proceed-
Ings t~ ~ai,n. thereto
and- ...,.....
to en.ure , t Ii verta~
tlm r.~rit of the pro-
ceedings 'I made whlch
record Inc udes the te,-
tlmony and. evl,dence
uJl'on which- the appeal
Is based. '
II you .... . po",," with
a disability who needs
any accommodation In
order to participate In
this pro:ce8dlngi yOu ,are
entitled; at Rocost to
yO~,' to ttw prQvlslon of
certain. autstance.
Please contaCttbeCol~
lIer County FaclHtles
Management Depart-
ment. lc:aca.te.d ,t 3301
Tamlaml Trait .East,
BUlldln., W. ~'91...
FlortdaMll2; (~'252-
8380. Asslsted Ustenlng
devlce!iJor .the hearlog
Impalre . .1Ift: Bv'lIable
In the eouftW.CG,"",ls.
sloners'i)fttCt.
BOAR,D OF. COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS. .
COLLI ~RC:O,tJ,HTY ,I
FI..aRIDA
TOM HEttNING, '. I
CHAIRMAN
DIYtGHTE. BROCll;
CLlRk
By'T......PoI...'
..f;.'ji..,
($ AL '"
t:eb. 10, 17 No 1661825
,t - ,': ,:,,;;<:~ - :~,', "',:: ", ,~:]f. ,,_
'~;-'-~__~j)'Flf;\~f;::.t'~
.''''\:," ",,_ ,'(- .,:.,',' l' ',,'
~ ,,,,,. "~ _ """" 'i'>~"r"c
"<",',
d.
"-,,:,,\,'i.
'5'1,'"
c.~~',' ;'f~~
- ;'",
~
,"'I
q,,- 2/'
,
'.
3.
i'
4!
'"t'
i
c_"
i:.,
;('f/l/
:~~-'.-;, """':-'-"', "
"
.
:4\<1:" ",t-'~'",'
"gt" , , ;; ,N/A is not
, "": _" "C-.
"~.,, ,
". lin~ 6. "
..~
1
.' ~ "A
'y'
-':".,-,
"" , ~'~i<"'\~~~-':-~-;l?,:~
'., '~\~ _.r?!il~~i"~.,\,,&,_~~,~k-';lH.-~~
"
.,
" IllU "j"lIII"llni1l/~Oli_1)J
IIi, I I!
, il~.~.u9 6* 'Sed 26lrs ~ re(t2~~u """'-;-+,>fi!."'''''''l;",;~.,.,',~'-'/j,:,,~
.1lII._. ....____....... m, ,~VI 'I. "Rev. ."" '
.,.'~',1"'-X-.i--\';--i!l',:'1..-1;~~'-',~ ',''''lIl-,.(;'':''j,
,"c-
"''-'~~~~)l#_~'''}*~N'I'Ii'~~_:~~lb!''~It_~.f~,,*%..~-\.:,~,;;t' :~M~jt~,\"'1t_
Retn:
CLBRK TO THB BOARD
INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR
BIT 7240
4135616 OR: 4335 PG: 2143
RBCORDBD in the OPPICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, PL
03/04/2008 at 03:12PM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK
RBC PBB
coms
27.00
3.00
RESOLUTION NO. 08-~
l?B
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PETITION
AVESMT-2006-AR-10754, DISCLAIMING, RENOUNCING AND
VACATING THE COUNTY'S AND THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN A
25 FOOT WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER THE SOUTH AND
EAST 25 FEET OF THE NORTH 'j, OF THE NORTHWEST Y. OF
THE NORTHWEST Y. OF THE SOUTHWEST Y. OF SECTION 24,
TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, ORIGINALLY
CREATED AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 2693
PAGES 3215 AND 3216, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND NOW FURTHER DESCRIBED IN THE
ATTACHED EXHIBIT 'A', AND ACCEPTING A REPLACEMENT
DRAINAGE EASEMENT, ALSO SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED
EXHIBIT 'A', IN PLACE OF THE VACATED EASEMENT,
WHEREAS. pursuant to Section 125.01 and 125.37. Florida Statutes, Petitioner,
La Playa Golf Club, LLC. has requested the vacation of a 25 foot wide drainage
easement over the south and east 25 feet of the north Y, of the northwest Y. of the
northwest Y. of the southwest Y. of Section 24. Township 48 South, Range 25 East
having been originally created and recorded in the Official Record Book 2693 pages
3215 and 3216 of the Public Records Collier County, Florida. and depicted in Exhibit
'A'; and
WHEREAS, in conjunction with, and as part of Petitioner's request, Petitioner
has offered for dedication an alternate 20 foot wide drainage easement as a
replacement easement, attached hereto and also depicted in Exhibit 'A', in place of the
vacated easement; and
WHEREAS, the Board has this day held a public hearing to consider the
Petitioner's request, and notice of said public hearing to vacate was given as required
by law; and
WHEREAS, the granting of the Petitioner's request will not adversely affect the
ownership or right of convenient access of the property owners; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the County's interest in the
25 foot drainage easement as specifically described in Exhibit 'A' is hereby vacated,
extinguished, renounced and disclaimed, and this action is declared to be in the Public's
interest and for the Public's benefit.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County hereby accepts
the dedication of the replacement drainage easement attached hereto and shown on
Exhibit 'A'.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Clerk to the Board is
hereby directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution in the Official Records of
Collier County, Florida.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same,
this O1(,iJI day of rdJrlkAry ,2008.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ERK, ~
. t,.... I
By:
TOM HENNING,
Approved as to form and legal
sufficie
0""1'11"'")>
"0)>)><
<D~' (1" m
..C1lj=I"'"CJl
......!:l.-)>;s:
"""-1-<-1
t:3N-<)> I
......0 ""
_0 G)O
0", 00
.....0 en
~ 1"'"'
o "1'1)>
o ;s:;o
CO )>.:..
o _0
Z.....
-I'"
m~
Z
)>;0
Zm
(1<
m"
""
o
c:
m
......
-
to
-
o
CO
!/)
>
'~
~
..~
3:t\
,~
Ij~
,Ii
III
III
o
"i
0:1
~
'"
~
Cll
I
'"
'"
I
o
.,
I I
'"
~ "'1;
<;> ~;:
'" <;>""
"" "'...
~ ~~
~ "'a
~ ~O:I
~""
~ ~~
I&: 021
1&:",
~ -
'" ",0
- 021
.... -m
o ~P:-
~ """,2.:
- ,"0
-0:1
;j
~
0:1
:il
~
'"
~8.
0:1
~
'"
-
o
21
~
~
I
~
o
I
o
'"
VI
'"
'"
d
o
..:
'"
.
~
0;
~
'"
.5
1
I
1
I
-HDJ'TlN
00>(11
mO~..."
JT1"':ii::8
<~~-1
~u)-1o
,..J.-'>:::tI
rrl"'OVl~
o>""Uz
<>","
JT1:::t1~
"'0
"'.
-;0
"',
50' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
AND UTILITY EASEMENT
(NOO'08'38'W) (330.42')
~
-
?L
OR: 4335 PG: 2144
CYPRESS WAY
"U
;:0
o
"U
o
(J)
[Tl
o
N
o
o
;:0
)>
z
)>
C)
[Tl
[Tl
)>
(J)
[Tl
:;;:
[Tl
Z
-l
1
I
1
I
1
I
1
I
I
-I
I
1
1
(J)OZ
0'10
C :;;0
-l-l-l
III
::.EfTl
fTl ~
(J)
-l
Z"
ON
:;;0
~-l0
"I'1
-1'-~-l
O(J)I
'1-lfTl
(J)~Z
fTl"O
0-1'-:;;0
-l -l
OOI
z'1::.E
-lfTl
NI(J)
-1'-fTl-l
I
-1'-
OJ
I
N
(Jl
~
"
-1'-
-HIIJT1J\)
08l:i'"
mJ'\~b
<",,)/'.,0
>cnZ-I
otO-Io
>,!.H>::o
r;.l"'C(J)~
0>""lJ)>-
<>",~
JT1;;cj:!r1
"'0
",.
-;0
",.
-
z
'"
'"
01
'"
,,;
'"
.
B
0;
0>
'"
to
'"
....;
I
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
L___________L_________________________~-
I
1
"' '" "
"'to:l ~
g N~.
~... '"
I ()
""'''' ~
.. t::::II ==It::
." ..
b>~
:z:
iii
=i
~
(SOO'05'38'E) (330.86')
B
/
/
,al-
e"!
."
;:gil
~~
~'~
VlC")".
",,,,
"
",,.
ZZ
-<0
15' ORAINAGE ANO
LANOSCAPE EASEMENT
*** OR: 4335 PG: 2145 ***
'" '"
'" '"
:; :;
'" '"
::; ::; (j)O 0..... "o}>
Z Z co "I Oor
Ol ~ G) "(J}> mz '" rrr
~ C ::OG) c...... ..... rr
I I -< oz "'}> IZ 0-.....
l\) "0 0- "'0 :E"'I
co ~ .....~ (j)::O}>
I 0 :u "'r z~
0 I (j)- .....z " o-l 0
..., 0 }> "'m 0G) OI O"(J '"
'" 0 o}> ::0'" c}> (j)
}> Z::o "';:;: .....::0 Z::o 0
I Ir ::0
<"l ;;:: }>m }>. :E-< ..........
<"lE; (j) r", (j)'" c< "(J
~ ::0 "'.. "'", 0 :::J
~~ ~_.,- .._-~.._,-_._------..:;.:.:: os::'" (j)o "" 0
:1>- "'(j) ...... r
c;l ,"Z _0 O(j) Z
'" c;l ZO Zo ,,0 ::0'"
" .....c 0
"''' '" (j)}> .." -0
~ "'" ",m 0..... "
'" ::0::0 }>::O 0r:1 }>-
",<"l 0 "(J
'" >-'" (j)C z'" "..... mZ ::0
a:: "'- Z 0" '" 0
'" ",'" "(JO ::0'" .....0 -'" "(J
a::::l r}> I" Z..
Z "'0 }>G) ",'" '" G). 0
.., ZZ Z'" (j)..... ..... (j)
os::..... '"
;;1 ..., Z .....0 (j)I 0
0 "'- ~" 0", 00
0 ;;1"" :u ::oZ 0 C ::o:E 0
a:: (j)(") .....r .....Z ",Z ::0
0< !fl -}> IO (j)
~ a::>- os:: }> Oz :E::O "(JI :!':
<"l
"! ~~ Z Zo "'..... }>- Z
0 (j) (j)I ::o"(J }>
..., .. 0;;:: ..... :::J.. G)
0 ...," '-' r OOJ '"
'" }> ,,0 -"
l\) 01;' 0 Z ::0 "'" C '"
::0'" r(j)
q 0 .. }>O }>
~'" '" O~
"'''' 00 ::oC (j)
'a:: (j) 0::0 r..... '"
C " -<.I os::
'" ::0 ::Or ..... '"
Z (j)I
.., < 0", :!':'" 0::0 Z
'" (j) "'}> .....
-< Y' Oz ~Z
0 (j)0
::0 ::OG)
(j) ",::0 co'"
0.....
.....I "'N
-:E 0,"
0",
Z(j) }>",
"'..... (j)}>
:"'- (j)
" ......
..
(j)..........
",II
0"''''
~ZfT1
GO}>
Z::O(j)
"'..........
..IN
~ . :E '" 0
~ i ~ "tI ......... ... - -d:ri (:) '"
~ 0
= d......... !;; ~ 0.....0 (j)
(") ~ .... ......... ~ ~-" 0
"g ~ ......... ..., ::0
~ li~....~ 0 (j)" '" "(J
" ~ g g... "" I"'" :::J
~r;;~~ ~ - ..... 0
'" "(JO
'" ,,}> Z
&',,~" c:: I:Il 0 <"l .. Z 0
~~ ;-l!9. Z t3:j t:: ::l... ~ OO:to ~"
&~ g ~ t::1 ~ 0'" (j)"'..... 00
zo'" '1:1 o I
0.... ~ > l':' <"ll\)~[::j ~ CZ'" ::0::0
1:1 f~' !:Ii OI/lo.CI.J~ Z .....0 ",}>
f~g"d ~ E' "'<"l .I ::::0 U1 "'2'
'.ooIli'!i! ..,":z: 0 .....0 <O}>
!D~[ S ' ~~N> ..., ::oIC Y'G)
}>:E..... '"
~..[ . n ~Z c;') Z",I "(J
!~ !l OOOt;lt:::l > C)~N G)'"
d=~" 0 '" '" }>
~".... t"" '-'(j)
z... '" [fJ N":::'O "''''
..go!; - :;l..~~ "'l c::: -os::
. . ,"..0
II~", " . Ol '" ~ '"'"
o '" "" c;lt;; n fTlO" ~Z
l;l~~ . ..."'''' t"" <: }>,,'" .....
:"'.. t: og~::l c::: trl (j) '" -
in :-!-t-l .....
"':;j 0 -<: 0
s z to IO
. O''(j >- "'0 0"''' m
;!' ~ " ~ Q. ..~"" t"" O(j)..... '" m
je;! 0 () 0 ~~ t"" rOI < ><
"Il~~" <0 e. ~ n C:CfT1
0 " }> :I:
~ 0.' "'..... 0
~ g ~ ""~ .. c;l ::oIz }> -
n.. I '" :Eo ..... t-iID
irii'ii 0 " 0 0"'::0 '"
'lDCOID c;l '" '" l\) O(j)..... 0 ~=i
"-IQiI 0 q '" C.....I ""
0
J..,z!Sca '" '" z_
I I I 1 >- ....." I
~WWN
~~M '" ~-< ~ F:
~~o ...,
CIl......W "0"
- ~'" '0 r"o
" "'''' " o "
"II> <;;' ~
"-
~o ~I ~ 0
- ?>
""'"
"t::f~
...
MEMORANDUM
Date: March 4, 2008
To: Stephen Higgins
Engineering Services Department
From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re: Drainage Easement:
La Playa Golf Club, LLC
Enclosed please find an original of the documents, as referenced
above, (Agenda Item #17B), adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008.
If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-8411.
Thank you.
Enclosure
178
178 I~
This instrument prepared by:
G. Helen Athan, Esq.
Grant, Fridkin, Pearson, Athan & Crown, P .A.
5551 Rldgewood Drive, Suite 501
Naples, FL 34108
239-514,1000
AVESMT-2006-AR-10754 REV: 2
LAPLAYA GOLF MAINTENANCE
FACILITY
Project: 2005040080 DUE: 1/9/08
Date: 12/21/07
Project:
PARCEL:
Folio No.:
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
tt-
1\ THI~ I;:ASEMENT, made and entered into this / J- day of
I~ , 2007, by LAPLAYA GOLF CLUB, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, whose mailing address is 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL
34105, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor"), to COLLIER COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami Trail East,
Naples, Florida 34112 (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee").
(Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties
to this instrument and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and
assigns. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as the context requires,)
WIT N E SSE T H:
Grantor, for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable
consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and sells unto the Grantee, a
perpetual, exclusive drainage easement to enter upon and to install and maintain
drainage structures and facilities, including but not limited to underground pipes, and
various types of water control structures under, upon and across the following
described lands located in Collier County, Florida, to wit:
See attached Exhibit "A" which is
incorporated herein by reference.
Subject to easements, restrictions, and reseNations of record.
THIS IS NOT HOMESTEAD PROPERTY
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee together with the right to
enter upon said land and to place and/or excavate materials for the purpose of
178
constructing, operating, and maintaining drainage facilities thereon. The easement
granted herein shall constitute an easement running with the land and shall burden the
lands described above.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Grantor, for itself and its
successors and/or assigns, does hereby reserve the right to use said easement area for
the following purposes: (a) drainage of storm water from land owned by Grantor, which
land is adjacent to said easement area, and (b) a water management berm, back yard
swales and landscaping. Grantor acknowledges that it shall install root barriers for any
plants within 10 feet of any pipes in said easement area and that Grantor shall be liable
for and replace any improvements which Grantor has placed in said easement area and
which may be damaged by the Grantee in exercising its rights hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the
date and year first above written.
WITNESSES:
LAPLAYA GOLF CLUB, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
THE HALSTATT PARTNERSHIP,
a Florida General Partnership, as Managing Member
By: Katherine G. Sproul and Jennifer S. Sullivan, as
Trustees of the JULIET C. SPROUL TRUST under the
Will of BARRON COLLIER, JR., Deceased, and as
confirmed by change of Trustees dated January 1, 2002
and filed March 5, 2002, in Official Records Book 2992,
Page 2016 of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, PARTNER
C1 ~~ UJ1fttv
CAROLYN A SHAW
Print Name of Witness
>/)~d --:Zlt'/?" )' It.
/1/ "-;) . , " -" ,
l..Rt,,- \ ".le-lo:7 ;:',..re
Print Name of Witness
ustee
CJ{).J\.i' ~~ U 11 L~v
CAROLYN A. SHAW
Print Name of W'mjess
??a C/ \1./) ( ,,- f?:L, ':y .,,-u
~l(d{ -:Y'~('Cl1'Jrl Z.ch'
Print Name of Witness
178
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I ::z.~ day of M ~
2007, by Katherine G, Sproul, as Trustee of the Juliet C. Sproul Trust under the Will of Barron Collier, Jr.,
Deceased, and as confirmed by change of Trustees dated January 1, 2002 and filed March 5, 2002, in
O.R. Book 2992, Page 2016 of the P.R. of Collier County, Florida, as a general partner of Halstatt
Partnership, as a Managing Member of LaPlaya Golf Club, LLC, who is personally known to me or who
has produced as identification.
~{(~
Notary Public SUSAN L. MATURO
Print Name:
My Commission Expires: I 0 - It; ~ 0 8
i,J#I ~ Suun l MallKO
. " . My COmmlSSI()Il 003043616
"\'--:,1 !'"~pires October 15. 2008
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / i{, tt- day of /J.R ~
2007, by Jennifer S. Sullivan, as Trustee of the Juliet C. Sproul Trust under the Will of Barron Collier, Jr.,
Deceased, and as confirmed by change of Trustees dated January 1, 2002 and filed March 5, 2002, in
OR Book 2992, Page 2016 of the P.R. of Collier County, Florida, as a general partner of Halstatt
Partnership, as a Managing Member of LaPlaya Golf Club, LLC, who is personally known to me or who
has produced as identification.' _
~ 'l/h,~
Notary Public SUSAN L. MATURO
Print Name:
My Commission Expires: ({) - (S -0 S
..,.,., ~ 50un L Maturo
1 ~ .; My CommiSSIOn 003043616
"?o,"'~ ExpIres October 15, 2008
178
o f)fl otJ.v t(. vU <U/
CAROLVNA. SHAW
Print Name of Witness
i)~~~ .~, ',' .'Vv
, ')')(':j~:' i ~:, 1 ~)
Print Name of Witness
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged t>efore me this I;;. jlZ.-day of ~ 2007, t>y
Paul J. Marinelli, Chief Executive Officer of The Halstatt Partnership, as a Managing Memt>er of LaPlaya
Golf Clut>, LLC, who is personally known to me or who has produced as
identification, - _
4~.~
Notary Put>lic SUSAN L. MATURO
Print Name:
My Commission Expires: 10 -I S--O S
~"~ Susan l Maturo
~ ~ ~ My CommissIOn 00343616
~'t 0"..01 Ex.plres October 15, 2008
178
Q~a,A{~
LAPLAYA GOLF CLUB, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability mpany
/
/
CAROLYN A. SHAW
Print Name of Witness
.," -~ '
:f::'< -:-1 J... ,....h 1.., /" "'j
".? ,
. r:., ,,),., I .,' 1. +,
,-._l"<:;._ t ,)', i"; __~ ,
Print Name of Witness
By:
STATE OF Ft.
COUNTY OF Cbw...,I:ffl..)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this !.2."f'lday of ~, 2007, by
Stephen J. Lockwood, as a Managing Member of LaPlaya Golf Club, LLC, who is personally known to me
or who has produced as;;J::: t. ~
Notary Public .' n
Print Name: ',,/SAN L. MATURO
My Commission Expires: It> -IS -Cl~
J'q1-'f ~ Susan l M8tlKO
. ~ . My CommiSsIOn 003<43616
~~,,..,/ Expires October 15. 2008
LAPLAYA GOLF CLUB, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
()~ U.:AiiLY-
By: Stephen J. Lockwood & Company LLC
As A Managing Me r
CAROLYN A. SHAW
Print Name of Witness
?;i'~ .
. ' ~ '*" ~ .Jr"'j>~
J,(,' 0' 7 \ '1' (J"fu(l --;&tu
Print Name of Witness
STATE OF ft.. )
COUNTY OF r",-uE1t.. ) 'Ii
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of ~ 2007, by
Stephen J. Lockwood, as Managing Member of Stephen J. Lockwood & Company LLC, as a Managing
Member of LaPlaya Golf Club, LLC, who is personally known to me or who has produced
as identification.
~t.~
:P~ ~ Suun l Malul'O
~ ~ . My Comm.SSlOI1 00343816
.,.,. "".../ Expires October 15. 2008
Notary Public .
Print Name: SUSAN L. MATURO
My Commission Expires: 10- I s~o8
Acceptance by Grantee:
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E, BROCK, Clerk
. ,j"
~~'IM@',k
Qeputy Gle.rk "
~t"S\ nto(CN 1,... .
S19lt.tjirJ. ,MI.
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
By:
J ight
As i tant County Attorney
178 4"
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA