Loading...
Backup Documents 02/26-27/2008 R Board of County Commissioners Regular Meeting BACK-UP DOCUMENTS February 26-27,2008 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD (CRAB) AGENDA February 26-27, 2008 9:00 AM Tom Henning, BCC Chairman Commissioner, District 3 Donna Fiala, BCC Vice-Chairman Commissioner, District 1; CRAB Chairman Jim Coletta, BCC Commissioner, District 5; CRAB Vice-Chairman Frank Halas, BCC Commissioner, District 2 Fred W. Coyle, BCC Commissioner, District 4 (arrived at 10:15 a.m.) (absent on 2/27/08) NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. ALL REGISTERED SPEAKERS WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES UNLESS THE TIME IS ADJUSTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003-53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS." Page t February 26-27, 2008 ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LOCATED AT 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34112, (239) 252-8380; ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE. LUNCH RECESS SCHEDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1 :00 P.M. 1. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. Pastor Chuck Cary, Moorings Presbyterian Church Pledge of allegiance lead by Chief Don Peterson 2. AGENDA AND MINUTES A. Approval of to day's regular, consent and summary agenda as amended. (Ex Parte Disclosure provided by Commission members for consent and summary agenda.) Approved and/or Adopted with changes - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) B. January 22, 2008 - BCC/LDC Meeting Approved as Presented - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) C. January 25, 2008 - BCC/CRA Advisory Board Workshop Approved as Presented - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) D. January 29, 2008 - BCC/Regular Meeting Approved as Presented - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) Page 2 February 26-27, 2008 3. SERVICE A WARDS: (EMPLOYEE AND ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS) 4. PROCLAMATIONS A. Proclamation recognizing the continued support for Drug Free Collier and supporting "The Adolescent Mind and High Risk Behaviors" presentation scheduled for Wednesday, February 27,2008 by Michael Nerney. To be accepted by Maria Victoria Delgado of Drug Free Collier. Adopted - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) B. Proclamation to recognize Golden Gate Fire Chief Donald R. Peterson for 27 years of dedicated service to Collier County. To be accepted by Chief Don Peterson. Adopted - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) C. Proclamation to offer our appreciation and thanks to the volunteer drivers, office staff, and their families for their efforts in making the quality oflife better for the veterans in our community. To be accepted by Jim Elson, President, Collier County Veterans Council and Don Peacock, Treasurer, Collier County Veterans Council. Adopted - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) 5. PRESENTATIONS A. Construction briefing on six lanes of new roadway including new signals and street lighting on Collier Boulevard from Golden Gate Boulevard to 7th Ave North and from Mission Hills to Immokalee Road. Also includes bridge improvements at Tree Farm Road and new roadway on Tree Farm Road. In addition building a new multiuse pathway on the east side of the canal parallel to Collier Boulevard from Vanderbilt Beach Road to Immokalee Road. Presented B. This item to be heard at 1 :00 p.m. Presentation by the Collier County Fire Chiefs' Association regarding the Consolidation Report. Motion to have County Manager include all participants including EMS and other independent parties in the discussions - Approved 5/0; Motion that the Board ratify that if consolidation occurs EMS will be included and will not be under control of County Government _ Approved 5/0 Page 3 February 26-27, 2008 C. Recommendation to recognize Mary-Jo Brock, Executive Secretary, County Manager's Office, as Employee of the Month for January 2008. Presented 6. PUBLIC PETITIONS A. Public petition request by Michael and Tammy McEndree to discuss the Santa Barbara Extension Project and a sound barrier wall on the east side of Polly Avenue. Presented B. Public petition request by Donald Kennedy to discuss clearing of Hurricane Wilma debris from Rock Creek. Chairman Henning to write letter to various agencies asking for assistance - Consensus C. Public petition request by Gregory Pellechia to discuss Johnnycake Drive portion of the Willow West Stormwater Improvement Project #510776. Presented Item 7 and 8 to be heard no sooner than 1:00 p.m., unless otherwise noted. 7. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS A. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. CU-2007-AR-11977 Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, represented by Robert L. Duane, AICP, of Hole Montes, Inc., requesting a Conditional Use allowed in the Estates (E) zoning district pursuant to Table 2, Section 2.04.03 of the Land Development Code (LDC). The 6.5 acre (E) zoned site is proposed for a Fire Station not to exceed 17,642 square feet. The subject site is located on 6.5 acres in the north east corner of Desoto Boulevard North and the proposed 22nd Avenue N.E., Golden Gate Estates Unit 72, Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. Resolution 2008-50 Adopted 5/0 B. This item has been continued from the February 12,2008 BCC Meetine. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition: V A-2006-AR- Page 4 February 26-27, 2008 10092 Mohammed M. Rahman, represented by Stephen 1. Fleming, P.E., requesting a before-the-fact variance from Section 5.05.05.B. of the LDC to reduce the lot width along the north and south property line from the required 150 feet to 135 feet, and to reduce the side yard setback along the west property line from the required 40 feet to 25 feet to permit an automobile service station. The subject property is located at 2393 Lake Trafford Road, Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. Resolution 2008-51 withe addition of "no loitering signs" Adopted 4/1 (Commissioner Coyle opposed) 8. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Request for the Board to consider a proposed amendment to section 1.04.04, Reduction of Required Site Design Requirements, of the Collier County Land Development Code as part of the Special Land Development Code (LDC) amendment cycle for 2008 as previously approved by the Board. Ordinance 2008-12 B. This item has been continued to the March 11.2008 Meetine. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition: PUDZ-2006-AR-lOI7l Eastbourne Bonita, LLC, represented by Laura Spurgeon, of Johnson Engineering, Inc., and Patrick G. White, Atty. of Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, LLP., requesting a rezone from the Agricultural (A) and Special Treatment (ST) Overlay Zoning District to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for project known as Brandon RPUD, for the development of204 single-family and multi-family residential units. The subject property, consisting of 51.1 acres, is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard, Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. 9. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A. This item to be heard at 10:30 a.m. Presentation to the Board of County Commissioners by Andrea Sims, Waters-Oldani Executive Recruitment, a Division of the Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and consideration of the recommended five finalists for the Collier County Attorney position. Page 5 February 26-27, 2008 Motion to approve the selection of the 5 final candidates - Approved 5/0; Discussion regarding interviewing procedures and questions; Interviews will be held on April 9, 2008 B. Appointment of member to the Pelican Bay Services Division Board. Resolution 2008-47: Appointing Robert A. Pendergrass from the "Resident" category w/term limits expiring on 3/31/10 Adopted 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) C. This item to be heard at 3:00 p.m. To provide information on the status of the Southwest Florida Expressway Authority (SWFEA) activities and the ongoing Toll Feasibility Studies for 1-75 and to take action to support or deny the attached resolution. (Commissioner Coletta) Motion to direct the County Attorney's Office to prepare a Resolution to emphasize non-participation in the tolling of Lanes 5 and 6; look at other options for moving traffic north and south and draft a budget amendment for a maximum expenditure of $300,000 towards funding the study - Approved 3/2 (Commissioner Halas and Commissioner Coyle opposed) D. Appointment of members to the Radio Road Beautification Advisory Committee. Resolution 2008-48: Re-appointing Dale L. Lewis (w/waiver of term limit) and Betty R. Schudel - Adopted 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) E. Appointment of members to the Bayshore Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee. Resolution 2008-49: Re-appointing Bill L. Neal w/waiver of term limit and Maurice Gutierrez( w/waiver of term limit) - Adopted 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) 10. COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT A. Discussion on the history and application of the Land Development Code regulations concerning the rear yard setback requirements for accessory structures in the Golden Gate Estates Zoning District. (Susan M. Istenes, AICP, Director, Zoning & Land Development, CDES) Motion to approve Option No.3 on lawfully permitted structures; County Attorney's Office to memorialize actions in a Resolution to be Page 6 February 26-27, 2008 brought back at the next BCC Meeting - Approved 3/2 (Commissioner Henning and Commissioner Halas opposed) Continued to March 11, 2008 BCC Meeting B. Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadway (private) and drainage improvements for the final plat ofOlde Cypress Unit One (Olde Cypress PUD). The roadway and drainage improvements will be privately maintained. (Stan Chrzanowski, Sr. Engineer, Engineering & Environmental Services Department, CDES) C. Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners evaluate the feasibility ofa Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District Transfer of Development Rights program applicant proposal relative to severance eligibility in relation to the attainment of the Environmental Restoration & Maintenance and Conveyance bonus credit to a CDD. (Joe Thompson, Senior Planner, Comprehensive Planning Department, CDES) To invite other governmental agencies to the March 25, 2008 BCC Meeting to discuss options regarding TDR's D. Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners provide direction to the County Attorney and the County Manager, or his designee, related to desired changes to the Charitable Organization Impact Fee Deferral Program (Amy Patterson, Impact Fee, EDC Manager, CDES) Motion to accept Alternative Proposal No.2 - Approved 4/1 (Commissioner Coletta opposed) February 27, 2008 E. Recommendation to adopt FY09 Budget Policy. (John Yonkosky, Director, Office of Management and Budget) General Fund Budeet Allocation: - Motion for a mileage rollback minus 2 % reduction in spending (only rollback for MSTU's) - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent); Milleaee Tareets - Approved 3/1 (Commissioner Henning opposed and Commissioner Coyle absent); Staffine: Motion on no new positions and maintain the hiring freeze on vacancies - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent); Health Care Proeram: Motion to continue employee health care cost sharing (80/20) - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) and to strongly encourage the same with the Constitutional Officers; Page 7 February 26-27, 2008 Compensation: Motion to approve compensation proposal of only a COLA (4.2 %) allowance; no merit increases - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent); Stormwater Capital Fundine - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent); Resolution 2008-52: Adopting Budget Submittal Date of May 1, 2008 for the Sheriff's Dept. & the Supervisor of Elections Office - Adopted 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent); Budeet Hearine Schedule - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent); Comparative Budeet Data - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) Contineencies -2.5 % - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent); Accrued Salary Savines - Cost Center Level - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent); Revenue Policies - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent); Three-year Budeet Proiections - Ad Valorem Tax Funds - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) Time Certain at 5:00 p.m. - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) F. This item to be heard at 5:00 p.m. Recommendation to amend the FYOS Emergency Medical Services Department budget by reducing personnel, operating and capital expenditures to offset anticipated ambulance fee revenue shortfalls. (Jeff Page, EMS Chief) Motion for a Budget Amendment to continue funding (from reserves) EMS at current staff levels - Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) Moved from Item #16C3 February 27, 2008 G. Recommendation to adopt a Resolution amending the Collier County Administrative Code Fee Schedule of development related review and processing fees as provided for in Code of Laws Section 2-11 to include a $1,000.00 fee to cover the cost of performing hydraulic modeling and analysis necessary to ensure concurrency for water and wastewater services. Resolution 2008-53 - Adopted w/changes 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) Moved from Item #16E3 February 27, 2008 Page 8 February 26-27, 2008 H. Recommendation to approve a Resolution authorizing the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida, to execute Agreements, Deeds, and other documents required for the sale of GAC Land Trust property during the 200S calendar year. Resolution 2008-54 - Adopted w/stipulations 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) February 27, 2008 1]. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON GENERAL TOPICS A. Ken Thompson - Code violation issues 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT A. This item to be heard at 4:00 p.m. Discussion regarding the Richland PUD (Pebblebrooke) Motion to seek legal action to close the bar areas at Stevie Tomato's - Approved 4/1 (Commissioner Halas opposed) Moved from Item #16K2 February 27, 2008 B. Recommendation that the Board approve and authorize the Chairman to execute a continuing retention agreement for services on an "as needed" basis with the law firm of Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A., to meet County Purchasing Policy contract requirements. Approved w/changes - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) 13. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 14. AIRPORT AUTHORITY AND/OR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY February 27, 2008 15. STAFF AND COMMISSION GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS A. County Manager Mudd: Re: power outage February 26, 2008 B. County Manager Mudd: Budget concerns/challenges discussed C. County Manager Mudd: Feedback on trip to Washington D.C. with Commissioner Halas - Stressed Collier County's priorities to legislators D. Jeff Klatzkow: Re: David Weigel's Contract - Motion for Chairman to offer a written invitation to David Weigel to remain on as County Page 9 February 26-27, 2008 Attorney until the new candidate is selected - Approved 3/1 (Commissioner Halas opposed and Commissioner Coyle absent) E. Commissioner Coletta: Illegal immigration services concerns F. Commissioner Fiala: Note to County Manager to follow-up with Greyhound Bus owners on the status of cleaning up property G. Commissioner Halas: Washington trip - positive feedback H. Chairman Henning: Relay for Life Balloon Sale I. Chairman Henning: Olde Cypress variance issues; waiting for interpretation from County Attorney's Office J. Chairman Henning: Rental registration investigation report inquiry K. Chairman Henning: Cell phone taxing policy - information to be brought back to BCC L. Sue Filson: Re: Animal Services Advisory Committee vacancy M. Motion to Adjourn - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 16. CONSENT AGENDA - All matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken by one motion without separate discussion of each item. If discussion is desired by a member of the Board, that item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Approved and/or Adopted with Changes - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1) Request approval by the Board of County Commissioners for the proposed schedule for the Land Development Code (LDC) Amendment Cycle for 200S. Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 5:05 p.m. in BCC Chambers 2) Recommendation to approve final acceptance of the sewer utility facility for Botanical Place. W/release of Utilities Performance Security 3) To accept final and unconditional conveyance of the water utility facility for Treviso Bay Temporary Sales Facility. W/release of Utilities Performance Security Page 10 February 26-27, 2008 4) Recommendation to approve final acceptance of the water and sewer utility facilities for VeronaWalk, Phase 3A. W/release of Utilities Performance Security 5) Recommendation to approve final acceptance of the water and sewer utility facilities for Mediterra, Parcel 106. W/release of Utilities Performance Security 6) Recommendation to award Bid No. OS-4l97 Nuisance Abatement Services to Ecosystem Technologies, Inc. and Environmental Mowing, Inc. For lawn services and invasive plant removal and maintenance for code violators 7) Recommendation to approve the Release and Satisfaction of Code Enforcement Liens for payments received. As Detailed in the Executive Summary - Recording Cost $650.00; $10.00 per release of Lien 8) This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission Members. Should a hearine be held on this item. all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of Mediterra Parcel 125, Replat of Lots 44 - 47. 9) This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission Members. Should a hearine be held on this item. all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of Alligator Alley Commerce Center Phase One. 10) Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadway (private) and drainage improvements for the final plat of Mediterra Parcel 103 with the roadway and drainage improvements being privately maintained. Resolution 2008-42 W /release of Maintenance Security 11) Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadway (private) and drainage improvements for the final plat of Classics Plantation Estates Phase One, (Lely Resort PUD), the roadway and drainage Page 11 February 26-27, 2008 improvements will be privately maintained. Resolution 2008-43 W/release of Maintenance Security Continued indefinitely 12) Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadway (private) and drainage improvements for the final plat of Augusta at Pelican Marsh (Pelican Marsh PUD) with the roadway and drainage improvements being privately maintained. B. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES Continued to the March 11, 2008 BCC Meeting 1) Recommendation to award Bid #OS-50l6 On Call Landscape and Irrigation Service by category to various vendors for an estimated yearly cost of $500,000 (Fund Ill) Commercial Land Maintenance, Hannula Landscaping, and Vila & Son Landscape were awarded for on call landscape and irrigation services C. PUBLIC UTILITIES 1) Recommendation to adopt a Resolution to approve the Satisfactions of Lien for Solid Waste residential accounts wherein the County has received payment and said Liens are satisfied in full for the 1991, 1995, and 1996 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Assessment. Fiscal impact is $6S.50 to record the Satisfactions of Lien. Resolution 2008-44 2) Recommendation to approve, execute and record a Satisfaction of a Notice of Claim of Lien for Sanitary Sewer System Impact Fee. Fiscal impact is $10.00 to record the Satisfaction of Lien. For Folio #3] 155007024 Moved to Item #10G 3) Recommendation to adopt a Resolution amending the Collier County Administrative Code Fee Schedule of development related review and processing fees as provided for in Code of Laws Section 2-11 to include a $1,000.00 fee to cover the cost of performing hydraulic modeling and analysis necessary to ensure concurrency for water and Page 12 February 26-27, 2008 wastewater services. 4) Approve a budget amendment to recognize funds provided by South Florida Water Management District Grants in the amount of$450,000 and approve the necessary budget amendment for the Reclaimed Water Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project #74030 Which is the first phase of this project, four additional wells are planned to begin in 2011 D. PUBLIC SERVICES 1) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Margarita Del Socorro Escobar (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 165, Trail Ridge, East Naples. Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees 2) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Esaie Foreste and Lyla Foreste (Owners) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 161, Trail Ridge, East Naples. Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees 3) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Antoinette Laguerre (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 163, Trail Ridge, East Naples. Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees 4) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Antoine Joseph and Saintherese Joseph (Owners) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 3, Block 14, Naples Manor Addition, East Naples. Deferring $26,240.68 in Impact Fees Page 13 February 26-27, 2008 5) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Danielle Alexandre (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 162, Trail Ridge, East Naples. Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees 6) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Jose J. Rosas Arroyo and Maria E. Rosas (Owners) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 160, Trail Ridge, East Naples. Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees 7) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Gabince Fanfan and Monique Willien (Owners) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 49, Trail Ridge, East Naples. Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees 8) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Zilana Marc (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 51, Trail Ridge, East Naples. Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees 9) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Lunel Napoleon (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 52, Trail Ridge, East Naples. Deferring $] 9,372.46 in Impact Fees 10) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Vida Trainie Baltazard (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Page 14 February 26-27, 2008 Lot 164, Trail Ridge, East Naples. Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees 11) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Jacqueline Jules (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 142, Independence II-A, Immokalee. Deferring $19,274.83 in Impact Fees 12) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Jose Angel Olvera and Nora Beatriz Olvera (Owners) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 19, Liberty Landing, Immokalee. Deferring $] 2,442.52 in Impact Fees 13) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Islaine Georges (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 50, Trail Ridge, East Naples. Deferring $19,372.46 in Impact Fees 14) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Minouche Carilus (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 26, Liberty Landing, Immokalee. Deferring $12,442.46 in Impact Fees 15) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Samuel Trejo and Rebecca Castro (Owners) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 27, Liberty Landing, Immokalee. Deferring $]2,442.46 in Impact Fees 16) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Emmanuel Page 15 February 26-27, 2008 Louimare (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 30, Liberty Landing, Immokalee. Deferring $12,442.46 in Impact Fees 17) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Passiana Belizaire (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 35, Liberty Landing, Immokalee. Deferring $12,442.46 in Impact Fees 18) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Jose Penaloza Jasso and Aracely Penaloza (Owners) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 31, Liberty Landing, Immokalee. Deferring $12,442.46 in Impact Fees 19) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Miguel Angel Gaspar Francisco (Owner) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 22, Liberty Landing, lmmokalee. Deferring $12,442.46 in Impact Fees 20) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Jean Vital Astreide and Marie Astreide (Owners) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 10, Liberty Landing, Immokalee. Deferring $12,442.52 in Impact Fees 21) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Freeman and Freeman, Inc. (Developer) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 20, Block 29, New Market, Immokalee. Deferring $19,305.88 in Impact Fees Page 16 February 26-27, 2008 22) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Freeman and Freeman, Inc. (Developer) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot IS, Pine Grove, Immokalee. Deferring $19,300.01 in Impact Fees 23) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves, and authorizes the Chairman to sign, a lien agreement with Robert Martinez and Juani Martinez (Owners) for deferral of 100% of Collier County impact fees for an owner-occupied affordable housing unit located at Lot 34, Liberty Landing, Immokalee. Deferring $12,442.46 in Impact Fees 24) Report to the Board of County Commissioners a summary of the Impact Fee Deferral Agreements recommended for approval in FYOS, including the total number of Agreements approved, the total dollar amount deferred and the balance remaining for additional deferrals in FYOS. 25) Recommendation to cease implementation of the Collier County Lethal Yellowing Disease Ordinance 2004-11 suppression program due to funding constraints and lack of consistent evidence of program need. Advertise ordinance to be brought back to repeal Ordinance 2004-11 26) Request to approve the renewal of Contract #03-3445, Vanderbilt Beach Concession with Day-Star Unlimited, Inc. d/b/a Cabana Dans. For an additional five years E. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1) Recommendation to award bid # OS-5013, Safety Equipment and Supplies to a primary, secondary and tertiary vendor, based on the lowest and most qualified bids. The primairy vendor is Safety Products, Inc., the secondary is Ritz Safety, LLC and the tertiary is Grainger Page 17 February 26-27, 2008 2) Recommendation to approve two Second Amendments to Lease Agreement with A&P Boole, LLC, for the continued use of the maintenance garage and parking space on Arnold Avenue for the Sheriff's Office, at a combined annual rental of$92,248.80. The lease is extended to March 1,2009 Moved to Item #10H 3) Recommendation to approve a Resolution authorizing the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida, to execute Agreements, Deeds, and other documents required for the sale of GAC Land Trust property during the 2008 calendar year. 4) That the Board of County Commissioners award RFP No. 08-5012 for Cellular Communications Services and Equipment to Sprint Solutions, Inc. and further authorize the chairman to sign the standard County Attorney approved contract. ($320,000) F. COUNTY MANAGER 1) Recommendation to approve a Fifth Amendment To Lease Agreement with Gulf Shore Associates, Limited Partnership, for the continued use of office space by the Pelican Bay Services Division at a first year's annual rent and Common Area Maintenance fees of$33,588. Located at 80] Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 605; Pelican Bay Services is requesting an additional three years with a three year extension option on the lease that is due to expire on February 28, 2008 2) Recommendation to approve the submittal ofa Volunteer Fire Assistance grant application from the Isles of Capri Fire District to the Florida Division of Forestry for the purchase of wild land firefighting equipment and protective clothing. 3) Recommendation to approve the submittal of a Volunteer Fire Assistance grant application from the Ochopee Fire Rescue District to the Florida Division of Forestry for the purchase of wild land firefighting equipment and protective clothing. As detailed in the Executive Summary (50/50 matching grant) Page 18 February 26-27, 2008 G. AIRPORT AUTHORITY AND/OR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1) Recommendation for the Community Redevelopment Agency to approve an extension of Site Improvement Grant Agreement OS/2007 between the CRA and Phillip and Debra Pierce due to certain construction and permitting delays. (3144 Pine Tree Drive.) Extended to April 30, 2008 2) Recommendation that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners approve a budget amendment in the amount of $44,500 to fund mitigation at Rookery Bay to meet South Florida Water Management District and the Army Corps of Engineers mitigation requirements for the South Taxiway construction permit at Everglades Airpark. The contractor is Environmental Quality, Inc. which is under contract with Collier County Airport Authority 3) Recommendation that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners accept additional funds from the Florida Department of Transportation in the amount of $14,650 and provide a fifty percent (50%) match in the amount of$14,650 for a total Budget Amendment of $29,300 for security enhancements for the aviation fuel storage tank system (fuel farm) at the Marco Island Executive Airport. 4) To approve and execute Sweat Equity Grant Agreement(s) between the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency and a Grant Applicant(s) within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment area. (2500 Lee Street) 5) To approve and execute Site Improvement Grant Agreement(s) between the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency and a Grant Applicant(s) within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment area. (3043 Cottage Grove Avenue) H. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1) Commissioner Henning requests Board approval for reimbursement for attending a function serving a valid public purpose. Attended the Economic Development Council's VIP Breakfast Meeting at The Page 19 February 26-27, 2008 Withdrawn 2) Hilton Naples on Thursday, February 7, 200S; $20.00 to be paid from Commissioner Henning's travel budget. Located at 5111 Tamiami Trail North Commissioner Henning requests Board approval for reimbursement for attending a function serving a valid public purpose. Is attending The Marine Industries Association of Collier County Members Meeting at the Elks Lodge on Tuesday, February 12th, 200S; $25.00 to be paid from Commissioner Henning's travel budget. Located at 3950 Radio Road 3) Commissioner Halas requests Board approval for reimbursement regarding attendance at a function serving a valid public purpose. Attending the Economic Development Council of Collier County First Member Investor Meeting and Mixer for 200S on Thursday, February 2S, 200S, at the Naples Beach Hotel and Golf Club; $40.00 to be paid from Commissioner Halas' travel budget. Located at 851 Gulf Shore Boulevard North 4) Commissioner Fiala requests Board approval for reimbursement for attending a function serving a valid public purpose. Will be attending the Celebrate the Naples Launch of DayJet on Wednesday, February 13, 200S, at the Naples Municipal Airport; $7.50 to be paid from Commissioner Fiala's travel budget. Located at 580 Terminal Drive 5) Commissioner Fiala requests Board approval for reimbursement for attending a function serving a valid public purpose. Will be attending the 200S Women of Style Honorees on Friday, February 15, 200S, at the Naples Grande Resort & Club; $125.00 to be paid from Commissioner Fiala's travel budget. Located at 475 Seagate Drive I. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE 1) Miscellaneous items to file for record with action as directed. J. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS Page 20 February 26-27, 2008 1) To obtain Board approval for disbursements for the period of February 2, 200S to February S, 200S and for submission into the official records of the Board. 2) To obtain Board approval for disbursements for the period of February 9, 200S to February 15, 200S and for submission into the official records of the Board. K. COUNTY ATTORNEY 1) Recommendation to approve a Stipulated Final Judgment for Parcel Nos. S60 & 960 in the lawsuit styled CC v. J.s. Roath Corp., et aI, Case No. 05-l093-CA (South County Regional Water Treatment Wellfield Project #70S92). (Fiscal Impact-- $114,900.00) Moved to Item #12B 2) Recommendation that the Board approve and authorize the Chairman to execute a continuing retention agreement for services on an "as needed" basis with the law firm of Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A., to meet County Purchasing Policy contract requirements. 3) Recommendation to approve a Stipulated Final Judgment in the amount of $42,000.00 for Parcels l26FEE and I 26TDRE in the lawsuit styled Collier County, Florida v. Michael J. Crouch, et al., Case No. 07-369l-CA (Oil Well Road Project No. 60044). (Fiscal Impact $17,762.05) 4) Recommendation to Approve a Mediated Settlement Agreement and a Stipulated Final Judgment to be drafted incorporating the same terms and conditions as the Mediated Settlement Agreement in the amount of $215,000.00 for the acquisition of Parcels l13A, Sl3 and 913 in the Lawsuit styled Collier County, Florida v. Delbert Ackerman, et al., Case No. 06-1 I 24-CA (County Barn Road Project #6010 I). (Fiscal Impact: $99,919.00) 5) Recommendation that the Board review and approve an Affidavit and Attorney Certification, as well as a Consent to certain mortgages made by the Assignee, Light Tower Wireless, LLC, of a certain lease heretofore entered into by the Board on April 13, 1999 by and Page 21 February 26-27, 2008 between the County and Acme Towers, Inc. 17. SUMMARY AGENDA - THIS SECTION IS FOR ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: 1) A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FROM STAFF; 2) UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OR OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OF ALL MEMBERS PRESENT AND VOTING; 3) NO WRITTEN OR ORAL OBJECTIONS TO THE ITEM RECEIVED BY STAFF, THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OR THE BOARD, PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE BCC MEETING ON WHICH THE ITEMS ARE SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD; AND 4) NO INDIVIDUALS ARE REGISTERED TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THE ITEM. FOR THOSE ITEMS, WHICH ARE QUASI- JUDICIAL IN NATURE, ALL PARTICIPANTS MUST BE SWORN IN. A. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition: CU-2007-AR- 12384, Enterprise Leasing Company d/b/a Enterprise Rent-a-Car, applicant and owner, is requesting a Conditional Use pursuant to LDC Section 2.04.03 for a rental car agency within the General Commercial (C-4) Zoning District. The subject property is located at 13560 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 8, in Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Resolution 2008-45 B. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition: A VESMT- 2006-AR-l0754, to disclaim, renounce and vacate the County's and the Public's interest in a 25 foot wide drainage easement over the south and east 25 feet of the north of the northeast of the northwest of the southwest of Section 24, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, and being more specifically described in Exhibit A and accept the replacement drainage easement also shown on Exhibit A in place of the vacated easement. Resolution 2008-46 18. ADJOURN Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle absent) Page 22 February 26-27, 2008 INQUIRIES CONCERNING CHANGES TO THE BOARD'S AGENDA SHOULD BE MADE TO THE COUNTY MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 252-8383. Page 23 February 26-27, 2008 AGENDA CHANGES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' MEETING February 26. 2008 Item 10B continued to the March 11. 2008 BCC meetina: Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadway (private) and drainage improvements for the final plat of Olde Cypress Unit One (Olde Cypress PUD). The roadway and drainage improvements will be privately maintained. (Staff's request.) Item 16A1: The date listed in the Executive Summary for the BCC LDC Meeting 1 has been changed from Thursday, September 18 to Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 5:05 p.m. (Staff's request.) Item 16A12 continued indefinitelv: Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadway (private) and drainage improvements for the final plat of Augusta at Pelican Marsh (Pelican Marsh PUD) with the roadway and drainage improvements being privately maintained. (Petitioner's request.) Item 16B1 continued to the March 11.2008 BCC meetina: Recommendation to award Bid #08-5016 On Call Landscape and Irrigation Service by category to various vendors for an estimated yearly cost of $500,000 (Fund 111). (Staff's request.) Move Item 16C3 to 10G: Recommendation to adopt a Resolution amending the Collier County Administrative Code Fee Schedule of development related review and processing fees as provided for in Code of Laws Section 2-11 to include a $1,000.00 fee to cover the cost of performing hydraulic modeling and analysis necessary to ensure concurrency for water and wastewater services. (Commissioner Fiala's request.) Item 16F1: The first sentence in the second paragraph under Considerations should read: "The current lease term expires on February 28, 2008 . . . " (rather than 2007). (Staff's request.) Item 16G1: At the time the agenda went to print, the Amendment to extend Grant Agreement for this item had not been signed. The Agreement has been signed, and replacement pages have been distributed and provided for the record. (Staff's request.) Item 16H4 and 16H5: The Recommendation should read: "That the Board of County Commissioners, in accordance with Resolution No. 99-410, approve payment by the Clerk for Commissioner Fiala (rather than Commissioner Coletta) to attend function serving a valid public purpose." (Staff's request.) Item 17B should include the followina: This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. (Staff's request.) Time Certain Items: Item 5B to be heard at 1 :00 D.m. {rather than 9:30 a.m. as shown on the index.l Presentation by the Collier County Fire Chiefs Association regarding the Consolidation Report. (Commissioner Henning's request.) Item 9A to be heard at 10:30 a.m. (rather than 10:00 a.m. as shown on the index). Presentation to the Board of County Commissioners by Andrea Sims, Waters-Oldani Executive Recruitment, a Division of the Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and consideration of the recommended five finalists for the Collier County Attorney position. (Commissioner Henning's request.) Item 9C to be heard at 3:00 D.m. To provide information on the status of the Southwest Florida Expressway Authority (SWFEA) activities and the ongoing Toll Feasibility Studies for 1-75 and to take action to support or deny the attached resolution. (Commissioner Coletta) Item 12A to be heard at 4:00 D.m. Discussion regarding Richland PUD (Pebblebrooke). PROCLAMA TION J 4A WHEREAS, alcohol and other drug abuse in this nation have reached epidemic proportions/ and. WHEREAS, approximately 55 people died in Collier County of accidental drug overdoses in 2007; an increase of approximately 35% from 2006," and. WHEREAS, we should keep our youth, our greatest resource, drug and alcohol free and guide them toward a future of hope and opportunity," and. WHEREAS, the most effective way to reduce juvenile drug addiction is to reduce demand." and. WHEREAS, this effort depends upon the active participation of families, schools, and community organizations through education and prevention/ and. WHEREAS, Drug Free Collier, a ctNIlition of ct1lTlmunity leaders and partners, parents and the community at large, dedicated to heightening substance abuse awareness and education, urges all the citizens of our community to participate in alcohol and drug education and all related prevention activities, thus mtlking a firm statement that we are strongly ct1lTlmitted to a drug-free lifestyle/ and. WHEREAS, in recognitkm of and to continue the celebration of February 10-16, 2008 as htlving been designated "National Drug Prevention and Education Week': Drug Free Collier has invited Michael Nerney, National Consultant in Substance Abuse Prevention and Education, to make a presentation entitled "The Adolescent Mind and High Risk 8ehaviorsH on Wednesday, February 27; 2008. This presentation will be held at the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Administration Center located at 5775 Osceola Trail in Naples fram 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. NOW, THEREFORE- be it proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that it urges our community members to make a visible statement that we are strongly committed to a drug- free community by both supporting the efforts of Drug Free Collier and. particularly, by attending this special event. DONE AND ORDERED THIS 26th Day of February, 2008 80ARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER 'GUN , "LORIDA ATTEST: f 48 PROCLAMA TION WHEREAS, Fire Chief Dona/d R. Peterson has diligently served the residents of the Golden Gote Fire Contral and Rescue District for 27 years and is the longest serving fire chief in Collier County history: and, WHEREAS, under Chief Petersons leadership, the fire district created four new stations and added numerous firefighters and equipment to better protect a population that has grown exponential/y since 1 9SO: and, WHEREAS, the Golden Gate Fire District was the first in the county to support a joint emergency services facility consisting of fire, emergency medical services and law enforcement: and, WHEREAS, the Golden Gate Fire Districts light technical rescue team became the first in Florida to complete all state-mandated training: tmd, WHEREAS, Chief Peterson was instrumental in protecting tM Golden Gate Estates from numerous wildfires, structure fires, hurricanes and other disasters throughout his tenure as fire chief, serving tU a knowledgeable incident ClHfImandttr, strike team leader and liaison to state and national agencies: and, WHEREAS, the fire district htU never had a line-of-duty death: and, WHEREAS, Chief Peterson has made numerous personal and professional sacrifices to ensure the safety of the residents of the Golden Gate Fire Contral and Rescue District. NOW THEREFORE, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, recognize Chief Donald R. Peterson for his lifetime career of #rving Col/ier County. We thank you endlessly and wish you well in your retirement. DONE AND ORDERED THIS 26th Day of February, 2008. SOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER Ci UNTY, ORIDA ATTEST: TOM HENMNG, CHAr. PROCLAMA TION 4C WHEREAS, the Veterans Transportation Program is a cooperative effort between the Collier County Board of County Commissioners and the Collier County Veterans Council; and, WHEREAS, the purpose of the Transportation Program is to provide free transportation for Collier County veterans to VA healthcare facilities in Ft Myers, Bay Pines, Tampa, and other facilities in South Florida; and, WHEREAS, the drivers in this Program are all volunteers who donate their time and effort to see that our veterans receive needed healthcare in a timely manner; and, WHEREAS, the families of these volunteers also contribute to the success of this Program by supporting the volunteers and the goals of the Tronsportatian Program; and, WHEREAS, in 2007, our volunteer drivers donated 2,044 hours, transported 610 veterans, and logged 57,195 accident-free miles. NOW THEREFORE, be it proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that we offer our appreciation and our thanks to the volunteer drivers, office staff. and their families for their efforts in making the quality of life better for the veterans in our community. DONE AND ORDERED THIS 26th Day of February, 2008 IRMAN DWI~ E. BROCK, CLERK 7A COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: xxx Normal Legal Advertisement (Display Adv.,locatioll, etc.) .-.****************************************************************f~*~~~**** Originating DepU Div: Comm.Dev.Serv./Planning Person: Nancy Gundlach, AICP f \l.(IY~ Other: ~********* ate: 1'22.05 ontral And Rescue District Petition No. (If none, give brief description): CU-2007-AR-I J977, Big Corkscrew Island Fir Petitioner: (Name & Address): Boh Duane, Hole Montes, Inc., 950 Encore Way, Naples. FL 34110 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, 13240 lmmokalee Rd., Naples, FL 34120 Hearing before BeC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: F ebruarv 26. 2008 Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing. Newspaper(s) to be used; (Complete only if important): XXX Naples Daily News Other Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: Petition: CU-2007-AR-1l977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, represented by Robert L. Duane. Alep, of Hole Montes, Inc., requesting a Conditional Use allowed of the Estates (E) zoning disllict pursuant to Section 2.01.03.0.l.e. of the Land Development Code (LDC). The 6.5<0 acre (E) zoned site is proposed for a Safety Service Facility that will be a Fire Station and Administration Building not to exceed 17,642 square feet. The subject site is located on 6.5 acres in the north east corner of Desoto Boulevard North and the proposed 22nd Avenue N.E.. Golden Gate Estates Unit 72, Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed baring date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? Yes 131-138326-649100 No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: Revi~ yn ~~ ;htJ ),8 Department Head Date Approved by: County Manager Date List Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BeC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: County Manager agenda file: to Requesting Division Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. **~*~*****~****************************************************************************************** FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received: ~ Date of Public hearing: Z)2.!, leiS Date Advertised: ~ RESOLUTION NO. 08-_ 7A A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A FIRE STATION AND ADMINISTRATION BUILDING IN THE ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, SECTION 2.01.03.G.l.e., FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DESOTO BOULEVARD NORTH, OPPOSITE AND NORTH OF 22 AVENUE NE, IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH. RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORlDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establis~ coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use for a rue station and administration building in the Estates (E) Zoning District, pursuant to Land Development Code Section 2.01.03.G.l.e. on the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit lIA") that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section IO.08.00.D of the Land Development Code, as amended; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that: Petition CU-2007-AR-II977, mad by Robert L. Duane, AICp of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, an Independent Special District and Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Page I of2 The South 180 feet of Tract 115, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 72, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 8, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, and 7A 1be North 150 feet of Tract 115, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 72, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 8, of the Public Records afeollier County, Florida is hereby approved for a Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.01.03.G.l.e of the Collier County Land Development Code in the Estates (E) Zoning District, for a fIre station and administration building in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan found in Exhibit "B" and subject to the conditions found in Exhibit "en attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super-majority vote, this _ day of ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORlDA By: By: TOM HENNING, Chainnan , Deputy Clerk ow County Attorney Exhibits (attached): A. Findings of Fact B. Conceptual Site Plan, entitled, "Big Corkscrew Island & Rescue District #14,'. dated 1/07, which is prepared by Hole Montes, Inc. C. Conditions Page 2 of2 ?A' FINDINGS OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-11977 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes / No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes /' No C. Affects neighboring properties in: relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: _ No affect or v'Affect mitigated by M{~/-S J\.kJ\.v,J,lv-c-, J,- <;Qkit'Ct; _ Affect cannot be mitigated } D. Compatibility with adj acent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district y es _1<~=No _8,A ~ J O'l^- v", I he 7 ~"'- Based on the above fmdings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. CHAIRMAN_M~ DATE: !( r \ '\ -0/ EXHIBIT A ?A FINDING OF FACT BY . COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-11977 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 ofthe Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency ~and Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No . B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingr~eSS Yes_ No_ C. boring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor No affect or ~ Affect mitigated by _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use wit~trict YeSLNO_ Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. MFMBE~4!? DATE: /1- If ;-07 EXHIBIT A 7 A '~~ FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMIsSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-11977 The following facts are found: I. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yesl1tt No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes121 No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: 1!l No affect or ~ Affect mitigated by _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes~ No_ Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, wi tipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE:-A~h MEMBER: EXHIBITA ?A .... FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-11977 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes fj--No_ B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structur~s thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes~ No_ C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor ~ffe7: ~ affect or _ Affect mitigated by _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes~ No_ Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipula . (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: ,I 11~!o 7 .0. /:1 . //?-< /0 r'lj /-oV b-;e.-rT (/ '/ -=---. ~ EXHIBIT A I 7 A"",. FINDING OF FACT . BY . COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMlSSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-11977 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. z. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. C_ren" 1 <h, Lrnd D~,lopm'm Codo "'" Growili Maru<,,,,,,,,, P1m, Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow "'" ~ntrnL '1=.s in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingre Ii & egress . . Yes No_ . C. Ai ects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor e cts: No affect or .. Affect mitigated by _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use hithin district Yes j No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, . th stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: II Ii 0 EXHIBIT A ?A FINDING OF FACT BY . COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-1l977 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes J No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes.~ No_ C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or ~ Affect mitigated by _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district yes-0o_ Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE ~,I f 14 J 6l MEM13"" ~ ~ EXHIBIT A ?A FINDING OF FACT BY . COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-I1977 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. Z. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affectthe public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes / No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes v' No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: . . / No affect or ~ Affect mitigated by _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes (' No Based on the above fmdings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: /1/15/07 I I MEMBER: I'IhnA-. '---Re..eA {!d/~ EXHIBIT A tA FINDING OF FACT BY . COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-11977 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code anthorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes V No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes V No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: . V No affect or ~ Affect mitigated by _ Affect carmot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes V No Based on the above fmdings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. MEMBER: ./~ ~ DATE: 1(~/5=cJ 7 EXHIBIT A OHw~v..5N1NOZ 3.or,I~.ooM __, :;Nn~_____'j.~,lt.OON 1'1. --- _ ~.:!:!l_ _ _ _._._. .. ~ i , I! :1 , , il'!! 1 ~5i. ',. " ,.;., I "'. ';.." ::.'("r.<.: l.. .':"'3~":~' ',. ~. ",' '::., , '., l.;;_~'''',', : '.~ ".-' .... ..{ .... e....,..... :'.1' ';'.1.' ": '.' .: :';' '" ',"'.!,., :;. .:. .... .:... -: ";.' ....' ',," ..... 1,iJ..... ";<;}.; '. '~': .. '.:::~i';::' ;~, :. :. -. o.~'!' '.. ':,"'N' :'. : ,': ,', :]~,~:::::.,;- .... ...... ",'. . . :s o !!! ,i Wi " % Z o N .....j,... ;'. . ... .,' ::l ":'..," ,Il .... " . ~ il~ '. I, I ". " , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , :~ II! :, _ __.J.l!_______. ! .' ,I. "" '~l ',' ~iS~ -.o1.G~OI;tS ...,__uo ~ ... 1AI~1J. ,OO.:!'!L M.OI.f;l.lXIS .00'0'>\ ~.OUil,OO$ - - ______.___ n 'w'/lt'C ",otrll~. " _________~ _._._._____ :t.________ .___._ ..._9..__ --- --- --~ -------- ------- ---------.., // --------.-----:::::----.-...--------- '\ , --~,:;,-:~t'~~~~~:-a^'8 OJ.OS3a ! !~_m______ \ili ~ ~~ I (MI' 300M .000) -----------------m-------r-' 1 I II ______nn____n;;;..___... '. ~ -----or, ,_"'._.....-'-____n__ , \001"'"31 _ 3 ONINOZ ___~._:J!:!ll2'!?_ A . I - N ~ ~ . ~ is, ~ II 'I ~ i - < ~ ~ ! - N . ~ C .. ~ 01 C ~~ ~. 0- t g: i ~ ~ . ~~ ~ it ~ , 8 ~ ~w ~ f. ~ ! It) f'l U . 0 0 LJ [J I i :I, % W ":'. " i'::'.' ..:...._, 1'1 w ..." .... '.'" Il! H; . ~:II :,-,1 "I ~ 1i H ", ~ i~ ~ n i i I.' ! Ii . ' , ii, li!;.( ~: "I 'Ii' a ~~! i~ 1II,I!lh.!!!!! O'!~i~! ~ J ~ ...._Ii! , , , , , , i , , , , ~ ~ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , '. '. , , , , I ii~i! , s i ~ c , f 0 i ~~ ~llt l < "- LU Z LU :;:) Z~ LU~ ~i "Cl c N. N! .!i . !!! ,i wi " % I z , 0 ~ Ii N :1 i , , rtii..CWOt!:lW - "'~"1'rl\I:IO'_ 'll.... f\j:J<pr . " . :. ~ l:i !5u ; ~ W - ,0< > ~Si~ ~ l ffi O~~~Ej~i '" ~"'!1 t ~ ~ a's:.. '0. lit !1.l!: It W wZ .,<( ::>~ ~w z!: 0" >=0: -w 01- Z., 0<( 0;1; R ~ jl _ i/I Ii'; n ~~~ ~, ~~h 1" .~. -;.: ih.. IO~! rt_<.>-! /; @.~ '.a. 'a i ~dl hi ~Hi !II! lh. ~ 9 hi ,i~~ ;I n~ n<~ III H 8 . ~ r; , , w ~ ; o K J:: M ~ :. ~:i :e; (f). I I iq~ U ~d n L.1""nO.H i ~ ~~~ ~:i;j:lgo1'" .. 1lI t , ; . , . . . . I . . . a. > 0: ~ e UU!H!nB! -! ~ :i (3 d '" If '" . . I . . . . ::) 0( . 1 I I I . . ~ i.1f ~ II ; !..IHiiq!i~ :j Iii Wddhi ~ . ~~~ll . !j ~i I · f ~. IS 1"'6 ~ " i i: ~ ~l ~ ~. HJ..! ill ii,l 'I · !;ii I ~ ii!~ 'I Ilii; II ,'ii. JII J'li;l II ~ , III ~ ~t5 S~; ~~I c:c .... iii :J: ~ ! I:'i!JI ., ,,-I . . ~ Ii Ii~ I !I, ~ ~ <( * .Joll 1Il.J\- ;=012 wl=~ ~zro roDe ~()W a:W::l Oa:o O-ro U.w (!) a: iii '1 I CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL FOR 7A . "~"f'J CU-2007-AR-1l977 1. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the Master Site Plan, identified as "Conditional Use Master Site Plan," prepared by Hole Montes, Inc., dated January, 2007. The site plan noted is conceptual in nature for conditional use approval. The final design must be in compliance with all applicable federal, state and county laws and regulations. The Department of Zoning and Land Development Review Director may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by this conditional use, so long as these minor changes remain consistent with all applicable development standards. 2. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this conditional use approval, or major changes to the approved plan, shall require the submittal of a new conditional use application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Chapter 10.02.03, Site Development Plan (SDP) review and approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 04-41, as amended. 3. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low~pressure sodium lamps are encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged. a. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a "cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area. b. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated. 4. Along Desoto Boulevard and nod Avenue N.E., 30 feet of rights-of-way shall be dedicated to Collier County at no cost, in exchange for relieving the Big Corkscrew Fire District of turn lane requirements along Desoto Boulevard and nod A venue N .E. EXHIBIT C G; Current{ Gundlach/ Conditional Uses/ Big Corkscrew Fire Admin. Bldg. /Exhibit C Conditions 10-19-07 I ?A COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: xxx Normal Legal Advertisement Other: (Display Adv., location, etc.) ...................-..................................*.*.....*...*.*...*...*..**.***.*.****.***~. Originating Dept/ Div: Comm.Dev.Serv./Planning Person: Nancy Gundlach, AICP ~~: (2,.Il' () I Petition No. (If none, give brief description): CU~2007~AR-11977. Big Corkscrew Island ),de Control And Rescue District Petitioner: (Name & Address): Bob Duane, Hole Montes, Inc., 950 Encore Way, Naples. FL 34110 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, 13240 Immokalee Rd., Naples, FL 34120 Hearing before Bee BZA Other Requested Hearing date: January 15. 2008 Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing. Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): XXX Naples Daily News Other Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: Petition: CU-2007~AR-11977. Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, represented by Robert L. Duane, AlCP, of Hole Montes. Inc., requesting a Conditional Use allowed of the Estates (E) zoning district pursuant to Section 2.01.03.0.l.e. of the Land Development Code (LDe). The 6.5:!: acre (E) zoned site is proposed for a Safety Service Facility that will be a Fire Station and Administration Building not to exceed 17,642 square feet. The subject site is located on 6.5 acres in the north east corner of Desoto Boulevard North and the proposed 22nd Avenue N.E., Golden Gate Estates Unit 72, Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? Yes 131-138326-649100 No If Yes, what account should be charged tor advertising costs: Reviewed by: ~ '-tn. ~ 181/1/07 ~parunent Head Date . Approved by: County Manager Date List Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BeC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County ~anager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manlier. The Manager's office will distribute copies: County Manager agenda file: to Requesting Division Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy tor tile. ~........**..........*................~~......**....*................................................ FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received: ~ Date of Public hearing: ~ Date Advertised: ~l RESOLUTION NO. 08._ 7A -.. A RESOLUTION 01' THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR TIlE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDmONAL USE TO ALLOW A FIRE STATION AND ADMINISTRATION BUILDING IN THE ESTATES (E) ZONING D1STRlCT PURSUANT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVEWPMENT CODE, SECTION 2.01.03.G.l.e., FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DESOTO BOULEVARD NORTIl, OPPOSITE AND NORTH OF 22 AVENUE NE, IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florid.. and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has e<>nferred on Collier County the power to establish. coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 200441, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided. and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use for a fire station and administration bnilding in the Estates (E) Zoning District, pursuant to Land Development Code Section 2.01.03.G.l.e. on the property hereinafter described, and has fOWld as a matter of fact (Exhibit "An) that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 10.08.00.0 of the Land Development Code, as amended; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that: Petition CU-2007-AR-1l977, filed by Robert L. Duane, AICP of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, an Independent Special District and Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Page lof2 The South 180 feet of Tract liS, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 72, according to the pl.t thereof recorded in Pl.t Book 5, P.ge 8, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. and ?A The North ISO feet of Tract liS, Golden G.te Estates, Unit No. 72, according to the plat thereof recorded in PI.t Book 5, P.ge 8, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florid. is hereby approved for. Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.01.03.G.1.e of the Collier County Land Development Code in the Estates (E) Zoning District, for a fire station and administration building in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan found in Exhibit "B" and subject to the cOnditions found in Exhibit tiC' attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOL YED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. TItis Resolution adopted after motion, second and super~majority vote, this _ day of ,2007. ArrEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: , Deputy Clerk JAMES COLETTA, Chairman App ovedfS;o form and cien~: ~fI Je~ I. Wl_!zkow Chi A stant County Attorney Exhibits (attached): A. Findings of Fact B. Conceptual Site Plan, entitled, "Big Corkscrew Island & Rescue District #14," dated 1/07, which is prepared by Hole Montes, Inc. C. Conditions Page 2 of2 ? A -. " FINDINGS OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-I1977 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or _ Affect mitigated by _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes No Based on the above fmdings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: CHAIRMAN: EXHIBIT A 7A ... 'l ~.. FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-11977 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control. and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects : No affect or _ Affect mitigated by _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: MEMBER: EXHIBIT A I I. III JJ 15 m CIl;j!O e1M~ mo" g~cn ~-Ig JJJJm CiO::f: -Ire;; otoll'r t .~ i ! I . D . ' i = . .I , ., m >< :J: l:JI ::; l:JI lei !~ I. ,,~!i~ h!l.r ill(! ~1l'.1 !II! 11:\ ii! lip Ii i' ,I ~ lA' . · ': ZONING E - IE.t.t..) . pi . I , _-"'_'..0) hI_..... ~ ~ i -i: ~ .----------t-l----------------------------~;~:-~,~~-;;;)---------~-'1T-;--- 1- \------ ;1 i! I / \, DESOTO BLVD.I fir:! il!\ -", I 0 / '. u..~ "5_""_ Iii! III ... " ~~,.. .... I iB ft =~......~___._._=:=~=~=~=~=~_=_~=_~==~_=~~=:=~=:~:=:~~=~_=~=: l(\t~~ ~ , liillIHUI!i ;1~~)iiIWI H -------1-1- I ': , r : .. , z ' c : c: '$: Ol '" Ol , . . , . I . . . . . I . > c: immmm~~ .. ::0 i' ;ii~iiiiiiiii ~ < A 3:" "0 Olz -<0 "'- ::0-< .,0 -z ...." m,... "c ,...", ~m iiP i~ lill! I ~,>Il'il" i'~! I !ll ~ Pi: 'i i i · l! i Ii i' ~I ,i loa r ~ I: II , . ; i, i i , . ; . po . e ~ D 8 z .' Ol B~ " . '" . . a ; p~i:; ~ US~~!~ ~ 11' R m n i; . . . ~ II' ;-! ..oc.,.......... _M;_.".... WI lU~ If i'l:1 ~ I h II!, i,. ~ ,!'i -eo iS2 - ~!~a 1111 i!;" ~tJo.. 1Il;! i.ltX li1i; _.~ · liHL i a; ii ~ : I . ~ P ! ~~ . EZ .. a ~~ u . .. . J .. ! ~ B . III hi I I [uDD r II> " .' . . '" I' i ,",.;, : ' ~. " ;;.':;. .':>; '" z ~! s I" ~~ . ~J 1 0 . " ' ~ I ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ " ~ ~~ : ! : ,I . ~ I ~ . > ~ " ~ ~ I ~ I if l ~ ! I ;< 0 ~ __Jlr______ _ --------------~-----~--- SOO"II"IO.... .".. ,.... __'1~ i'" III "i 'I' " N o z z 1~ liil! l' , m 1 .. ' .. ~ -N I !.~ : ~ i a.: , ~~ ! ~~ I C! m: Z m w~ , , '. ;11>.....: I , i 1 ! : ! 1 ! : ! ~i ~i r! 1\ ;00\ : I ii 'I l f : ! ~ 1 1 ! , .. . .. ,~, e :. . I. II . il i ,'," :. ~~:-. . ' ':. .: . ,,:. ~II I N o Z Z " I'" l' m .. s- o !. c. .;.,. ",; ...... .;" '. , .. ":,",:,. ..... '.' .; ki,,;..:.:iil\::~.:: 15.... ..: u. :~(.> '<;r(>." "'0' '. - 'j' ~ ," . ,.' .'>-" -..- .....', :." .-:: ~ ':/."',:,"'."':. ~.~.! ..~, ::>:..; ......', >."<. :.;" 'r,~'. ':,;l . ';.; '" ..' :,;'..;. . :', ~il',':: '~', .' ..11'..." . "j. . Iii . '..~!i.;'.:" :" ",' .. . j! '.,. 11'1: .$!il : - , , , It I' , , , , ~ ~ ~l'Sl"i- UII.lIl' ~~ ii!.gg.lI'l J.llI.Ot'iii) ZONING A-MHO --- CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL FOR CU-2007-AR-11977 ?A 1. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the Master Site Plan, identified as "Conditional Use Master Site Plan," prepared by Hole Montes, Inc., dated January, 2007. The site plan noted is conceptual in nature for conditional use approval. The final design must be in compliance with all applicable federal, state and county laws and regulations. The Department of Zoning and Land Development Review Director may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by this conditional use, so long as these minor changes remain consistent with all applicable development standards. 2. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall he shielded such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low-pressure sodium lamps are encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged. a. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a "cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area. b. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated. EXHIBIT C G: Current! Gundlach/ Conditional Uses/ Big Corkscrew Fire Admin. Bldg. /Exhibit C Conditions 10-30-07 ?A December IS, 2007 Attn: Legals Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: CU-2007-AR-1l977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Sunday, December 30, 2007 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved, to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk P.O.lAccount # 131-138326-649100 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ?A Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed resolution is as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A FIRE STATION AND ADMINISTRATION BUILDING IN THE ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, SECTION 2.01.03.G.l.e., FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DESOTO BOULEVARD NORTH, OPPOSITE AND NORTH OF 22 AVENUE NE, IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Petition CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, represented by Robert L. Duane, AICP, of Hole Montes, Inc., is requesting a Conditional Use allowed of the Estates (E) zoning district pursuant to Section 2.01.03.8.1.e. of the Land Development Code (LDC). The 6.5 +/- acre (E) zoned site is proposed for a Safety Service Facility that will be a Fire Station and Administration Building not to exceed 17,642 square feet. The subject site is located on 6.5 acres in the north east corner of Desoto Boulevard North and the proposed 22nd Avenue N.E., Golden Gate Estates, Unit 72, Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 7 A "~ JAMES COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts ~mmty of Collier '" CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY C:OURTfJOUSE 330 I T AMIAMI 1(RAIL EA.ST P,O. BOX 413044 NAPLES. FLoRlDA~1101-3044 . 7A ~ Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds December IS, 2007 Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District 13240 Immokalee Rd. Naples, FL 34120 Re: Petition CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, January 15,2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, December 30, 2007. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~v~ Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 W chsite- www.c1erk.collier.f1.us --'-----.....,----..-.~--,-..~-~.-,,---"-.-.--.---,-.- "" _""H"_'___'_,_"~,_~,,,__,_ ",,_ ...__u__.________.______.___ Fax-(239) 775-2755 Email-colIierclerk\a)c1erk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts 'eounty of Collier 1.- CLERK OF THE CIRCUJT COURT COLLIER COUNTY <tOURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI ~MIL EA.ST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA 't~101-30~4 -* ? A' Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds December IS, 2007 Bob Duane Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District Dear Petitioner; Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, January 15,2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, December 30, 2007. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK /~ Martha Vergara, Enclosure ---,_._.,.,--_.,-_._-,,-,~----.,,---~_._-,---.._,-_._--".-.-- Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.coIlier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-coIlierclerk~c1erk.coIlier.f1.us Martha S. Vergara ?A From: Sent: To: Subject: postmaster@collierclerk.com Wednesday, December 19, 2007 10:35 AM Martha S. Vergara Delivery Status Notification (Relay) Attachments: ATT341031.txt; CU-2007-AR-11977 Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue Dist. [J B ATT341031.txt (231 B) CU-2007-AR-11977 Big Corkscrew... This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. legals@naplesnews.com 1 Page 1 of 1 7A.." Martha S. Vergara ----_._---^-_._----~~._---_...._-----_..._-_._----_. From: Perrell, Pam [PPerrell@Naplesnews.com] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 8:40 PM To: Martha S. Vergara Subject: RE: CU-2007-AR-119n Bi9 Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue Dis!. OK -_._._---_.~_._-.,_._----~~~._---_._-_._._-_.- .'...... --.-.-.,*,--"-..,..---.-.-....." - '..---..-..--+.,. - ....-.--.--....+...-...-..-.-.....-...----..+-..----.-~----_.__..+_... From: Martha 5. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com] Posted At: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 10:35 AM Posted To: Legals - NON Conversation: CU-2007-AR-11977 Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue Dlst. Subject: CU-2007-AR-11977 Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue Dlst. Pam, An ad for you.. Thanks, Martha Vergara Deputy Clerk II - BMR 252-7240 12/21/2007 Page 1 of 1 7A Martha S. Vergara _.....~-_._--~-_...._---~---_.,--_.,---------,.._~---,'--'-~'-~"--"'----'---'----------~--_._. From: GundlachNancy [NancyGundlach@colliergov.netl Sent: Thursday. January 10, 2008 4:53 PM To: Martha S. Vergara Subject: RE: CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire & Rescue District Hi Martha, This item wili not be heard at the January 15, 2008 BCC meeting. It has been scheduled for the February 26, 2008 BCC hearing. Regards, Nancy From: Martha S. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk,com] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 20084:44 PM To: GundlachNancy Subject: CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire & Rescue District Hi Nancy, Quick question, will you be adding this Item to the BCC Jan. 15th Meeting on the change sheet or has this item been cancelled? Was reviewing the items advertised and this one isn't on the Agenda. Thanks, Martha Vergara Deputy Clerk II - BMR 252-7240 1/11/2008 Th, -.APLES OAIL Y '\[WS Published Dail~ ""pies" FL1~ 1112 Affidavit of Publication State of rlorida County of Collier Before the ltndersigned thc~ sene ;IS lhe ;]uthority. personal1} appeared B. Lllllh. \\110 on oath S<l\S th;lt lhc~ SCIYC ;lS the i\s,;j"'l:111t Corporate SccrClar,\ of the :-\aplcs Dail). <l daily IlC\\Sp;lpCr published at Naples. in Collier COUllty. I:Jof!cl<!: distrihuted ill C'olljer ,lIld lxl' COUlllics or Florida: that the attached COpy of the adYcrtlsmg. being a PIJElLlC NOTICE Illlhe mailer or 1'1 KUC NOTICE \\JS published in said newspaper I time iIllhc isslle all December ~OI;I. 2007 \ili<lTl[ hll1hc.:r says 111:11111.: said '\3.pk~ ])ail~ \~'\\" i~;1 JW\lSrap.:r pubiishcd at '\ark~. in said (nl1i<.:rCDlUlty. l'lorida. and 111<1! the said nc.:\\~J);qkT jus hc.:rdnj'or<: hc..::n clllltillllllUS]V publislh:d in said (\ll]i~] ("'I!il:\ 11,)ri(b~ di~trihukd in (\,]li~r :md J ,~L ,"l\ln[i>2~ or I']ol',da L'ilL'h d;I\' :lnd ha:< lw..:n ..:nkr..:d as s>2c,md dass lllail11latkr at the rost "niL'.' H1 'apks_ 111 said Colli..:r Countv. nonda. (or ;1 pc'riod 01 1 \"::lr nL'_\l pr~~'>2ding 111<.' lirs! rllhli~'ali,'ll ofthc attad1<.'d ;':()P~' of ;ll!\'L,rtis":Il1,'nl: al1d :lnial11 fl111hLT -',1\, 111al lh' Ius lll:illll:r paid llor pl'>llli~",j ,!Il\ p..:J~"<I_ til'lll ell L\Jlvulallull all;' dh<:"UI1i. l..:h<ll~ ;__{)l\1ll1i~,~i('n \'r rcllllld j"l" thl: rurrHl~C Dr ~i.'curing ,hi~ ;ic!\;.'rli,..-mcnl f,lr II'iLii~;;i"'1 ill Ilk' '~Ild Ill:',\"'pajk'l /-...-- Signatllfc of affiant) S"Or!l 1(; and suh<.;nibcd be Core [1\(' This lO'hDa\ of December 20117 hUrL.... (1\[;..."..0<') ( Sig~~-;~F~)l;}r~r;\blic) FE! )()-257X,127 f~?~~~.~:!t~:l ~~. :;f "l~.. 0':,,- ",.9f","" JUDY JANES Commission DD 675029 Expires May 16, 2011 BonOOdThrurroyFew,i~su'al'~8I)O_:'lJl5'7'OIg .:18: Notice Is herebygfven that the Board of County Commlsslone.rs of Col- lier Cownty will hold a public. heai. Jna on Tues- .a.. January 15. '008 In the Boardroom. 3rd Floor, Adminllt"tlo,n aLllldlng, COm.r, COlInty , Go:v\,'p"ment Center. - ....1 T&mlaml Tratl "-.:p'8S, Florld.~ The' meet;IIID, will beolt, at 9:00 ...... The lllle '" the pr~.osed resolution Is !liM_ A RE$OI,.UT'ON OF THE 8OARO OF ZONING Ap. PEALS OF COLLIER CO'OlIJ!!lJY JI.ORIOA"_PRO. V 1'WI'1"vR THE ~TAB- ".SI!ME ,.ii Of A"._C.ONDI' TtOljj\l. -TO:l.\;LOllf _ A Jl1lU1t8: IJIQ III TIiIi ESTATES (E) ik'NGDISTRICT_, ANT TO TIiIi lERf . TC~&IJJ; j ''OI....'U.... ~APAOP. , Ell'lY LOCATED ON THI lAST SIDI Of DElOIO BOUI,fVAR;'NOOTHi up. POS'TE A NOllTH OF 22 AVINU ~.~~..!IC. liON 28,TUWIQlftP. SOUTH. RANGI! 21 lAST, COLL'ERCQUNTY. FLORIDA \~\< petlth~JJ,' cu.tOoi~'4.' IIW1. IIIll eo_ .. 'and flr.C~':.lJA Olstrl<l.ra ,.~ R_L._ ,. Hole Montefi:.ml:.: -ft- qua"lno a, bMdI.' Ii,: ooa' use a11owecCif"tKe ES- tates'(E) zonN~ct Dur.lI.nt to ....c~ 2.0L03.G.l.e. of ll~' atsm!, .t,::~..ct.. (LI). !fM.~ (t2~' .', ..,.,,<,,"' r~;d t .~~II~~ Fire r.a~n ~ Admin. Istratlon Bulldlno not to exceed 17.642SQua',e feet. The SU~ !llte . located on 6.5 acres In the north east comer of Desoto Boulevard North and the ..._~ Avenue N.l., Golden Gate Estett:., untt n. :!i;l!:' NOTE:AU.~ wlsh- I Ing to'Prik on any ::'"':Itt.~,,~.~ ~ mlnIW4I<)r ,~,"lO .... sentatJOn- .,w_ ~ _lOlIe_sod. 1~dt:J~.~.~1 i'A be limited t-osm~ on___ lllase_, "lion Of... '_Iduel to, ~beh8lf of an n or' QI'OUP 1. ~~.""'" recoo" nlZed ~y Iha Chelr. a 5'POk_B" ",';p.r'ton'or a Qrou,.'''''~or I.at'.. may,.'.aj. . 10 ml~ utes to ,spe on an _. per.~;:lshlng to =, ;rartl'n~"~ the 8cMIrd~~~ ets 'mutt s..t!nll~ Mid -"" . mtn_ 0/3 _k.l>rtQr ...."'* re. -~~ l'l.!!lt"'l! .. ,~"..,.'.'" shalt bllU . I to tho _rooriate COunty staff . minimum of sev. ' en d.~rlor18 Ih. f.~.....IJ:l':~= 11.",lIefora thoBoerd will bacomo a psnn.. nent part oflhO_. An..,.,..n who d~d. os to ......, a _.... "'the_WIII.....a recprd of th~, _,'", ., =.r=~hOr~\ to.nsUl'8.'~ Ilm:r,_' rts,d~.....th.~...", ..-1riUtJ.! .... t1ln'ori ':/ -r:.(i'~e lnn. cthe_1 OA P OFeii9UNT~ ~COUHT~.'\ \~COLETTA, CHAIR' M HT E e'RO~K, oVJ\G-' i~~RKMartha vergara. \'i'S~('~l.'&lI56 b~ 7A .',", , January 29, 200S Attn: Legals Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Sunday, February 10,2008 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved, to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk P.O.lAccount # 131-138326-649100 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 7A I' Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed resolution is as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A FIRE STATION AND ADMINISTRATION BUILDING IN THE ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, SECTION 2.01.03.G.l.e., FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DESOTO BOULEVARD NORTH, OPPOSITE AND NORTH OF 22 AVENUE NE, IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Petition CU-2007-AR-ll977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, represented by Robert L. Duane, AICP, of Hole Montes, Inc., is requesting a Conditional Use allowed of the Estates (E) zoning district pursuant to Section 2.0l.03.G.l.e. of the Land Development Code (LDC). The 6.5 +/- acre (E) zoned site is proposed for a Safety Service Facility that will be a Fire Station and Administration Building not to exceed 17,642 square feet. The subject site is located on 6.5 acres in the north east corner of Desoto Boulevard North and the proposed 22nd Avenue N.E., Golden Gate Estates, Unit 72, Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. 7A If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding; you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Building W, Naples, Florida 34112, (239) 252-8380. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the County Commissioners' Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts :-eOl1pty l;>f Collier CLERK OF THE C[RCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY ~OURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI 1(MIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES. FLORIDA~4JOI-30~4 * 7A Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds January 29, 200S Bob Duane Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District Dear Petitioner; Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK 0- f). ~U({ PoCtZ~'1 k \ '~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.clerk.collier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk@J.clerk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e-ouety of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY <tOURT~lOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI 'J\R.AIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES. FLORIDA 'l;IlO 1-3044 * 7A Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds January 29, 200S Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District 13240 Immokalee Rd. Naples, FL 34120 Re: Petition CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK \bL@~ k eresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone-(239) 732-2646 Wcbsite- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk\alclerk.collier.fl.us 7A Teresa L. Polaski To: Subject: legals@naplesnews.com CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District Attachments: CU-2007-AR-11977.doc; CU-2007-AR-11977.doc Legals, Please advertise the following on Sunday, February 10, 2008. Thank you ~ ~ CU-2007-AR-11977 CU-2007-AR-11977 .doc (29 KB) .doc (29 KB) Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners Minutes and Records Department 239-252-8411 (T eresa.Po las ki@collierclerk.com) 1 Teresa L. Polaski 7A From: Sent: To: Subject: postmaster@collierclerk.com Wednesday, January 30,20089:42 AM Teresa L. Polaski Delivery Status Notification (Relay) Attachments: ATT476181.txt; CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District I~...........'l L:J I"~..'-:~..,"I U ATT476181.txt CU-2007-AR-11977 (231 B) , Big Corkscre... This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. legals@naplesnews.com 1 CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District Page 1 of 1 Teresa L. Polaski 7A From: Perrell, Pam [PPerrell@Naplesnews.com] Sent: Wednesday. January 30, 2008 12:01 PM To: Teresa L. Polaski Subject: RE: CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District OK From: Teresa L. Polaski [mailto:Teresa.Polaski@collierclerk.coml Posted At: Wednesday, January 30,20089:41 AM Posted To: Legals - NDN Conversation: CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District Subject: CU-2007-AR-11977, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District Legals, Please advertise the following on Sunday, February 10, 2008. Thank you <<CU-2007-AR-11977.doc>> <<CU-2007-AR-11977.doc>> Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners Minutes and Records Department 239-252-8411 (T eresa.Polaski@collierclerk.com) 1/30/2008 7A Teresa L. Polaski From: Sent: To: Subject: Teresa L. Polaski Wednesday, February 13, 2008 4:01 PM 'Iegals@naplesnews.com. Ads to run on Friday Attachments: PUDZ--2006-AR-10171.doc; GU-2007-AR-11977.doc ~ iWlIl tJ PUDZ--2006-AR-l0 CU-2007-AR-11977 171.doc (36 KB... .doc (36 KB) Per your request, here are the notices to rerun on Friday, February 15, 2008. Please provide our office notification letter that these ads ran with the incorrect headings on Sunday February 10, 2008. And per our conversation you will be crediting us for the incorrect ads that ran. Thank you Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners Minutes and Records Department 239-252-8411 (T eresa.Po laski@collierelerk.eom) 1 Ads to run on Friday Page 1 r f 1 7A Teresa L. Polaski ~~-----~-_._--~-~'---'-"-~"'-- "-~-,.,'----- From: Sent: To: Perrell, Pam [PPerrell@Naplesnews.com] Wednesday, February 13, 2008 4:14 PM Teresa L. Polaski Subject: RE: PUDZ-2006-AR010171 & CU-2007 -AR-11977 The above referenced notices ran wrong on Sun. Feb. 10, 2008. The headings were interchanged as well as the ad numbers at the bottom, and the PO #'s would have been switched as well. We regret the error and any inconvenience we caused you. They will run correctly on Fri., Feb. 13,2008. I have credited the two (2) notices that ran incorrectly. Thank you for your understanding in this matter. Respectfully, Pam Perrell Legal Advertising Naples Daily News (239) 263-4832 ---~---~,--,.._~,-_._._~.~~- From: Teresa L. Polaski [mailto:Teresa.Polaski@collierclerk.com] Posted At: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 4:01 PM Posted To: Legals - NDN Conversation: Ads to run on Friday Subject: Ads to run on Friday <<PUDZ--2006-AR-10171.doc>> <<CU-2007 -AR-11977.doc>> Per your request, here are the notices to rerun on Friday, February 15, 2008. Please provide our office notification letter that these ads ran with the incorrect headings on Sunday February 10, 2008. And per our conversation you will be crediting us for the incorrect ads that ran. Thank you Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners Minutes and Records Department 239-252-8411 (T eresa.Po laski@collierclerk.com) 2/13/2008 Th.Th, NAPLES DAILY NEWS Published Daill Naples. FL 141112 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared B. L~lInb. who on oath says that they . serve as the ASSistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daill. a dailv nev\spaper published at Naples. in Collier Counl\. Florid:" distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida: that the attached copy of the ad\'crtising. being a PUBLIC NOTI<::.E in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE was published in said newspaper I time in the issue On Februarv I :;'C,.21111!! \flianl hl11hcr sa\'.'; that th" said i\aples Dail... !\.::ws i~ a n.::wspapcr Puhlislh:d al ~ari"s. in .:ollier county. Floridll and that the said l1<..'v,spaper has herdnfore been continuously published m .';,l1d Collier County. F1()rida~ distrihuted in Colli.:r and Lee counties of Florida. .::aeh (lay and has hecn entered as sc..:ond class mail matter al the post orli..:.:: in :\arks, in said Collier Cnunt~,. Florida. for a p.:riod of 1 \'Car n<:xl precnling lh.: first puhlication of the attached copy of ~d\'ertiserncnL and aOiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised ilny person. linn or l.:orporatioll any disl.:oum. rebate, commission or rdillld for the purpose of securing tillS advertIsement for ~Ubl'''I'<'''~t~:j~'W~ ( Signature of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me This I:;'" 200g [)ay()fFcbruarv 200H ~a < . 0.;~ (Signa Ire of al] pu he) FEI :;~.2:;7g127 ."";';'.". JUDY JANES , .,"".,.v.". . . 0067'-029 f'f:':!:' _ '.:r~ CommIssion v ~.~ ;:, E,pires May 16, 2011 -;.-0-: .... o~$-~ Bonood Thru 11'\1'1 f~lp In&Ufa,,~e 8OC.38,.70'~ Notice. Is hereby given that the Board of COunty Commlsslont,rs of Cor. lIer County will hold a ~ubllc hearing on Tues- day, FebruarY 26, .,In the BoardrOOim, - 3rlf floor, Ad,mlnJ.t,.U.Q:n Ilulldtng, CoIIfef Courlty Government Center, . 3301 East T"""""".11'olI, fIIaplu,'1qrlifa-. 1'he meeting will beam at 9:00 A.M. The ttdeot' the prqposed resolution Is as fOllows: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD- OF lONING.Ap. P.'EALS OF' COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA. PRO. VIDiNG '0. THE ESTAB- ...........T. TlONAL US ;1.0 A Fila: STA" ,"~I MINISTRATI- . LD~G IN THE ESUnS!E) ZONING DISTRICT PUR- SUANT TO THE COLUER COUNTYLAHO DEVEL. OPMENT CODl. SEC'nON 2.01.03.0.1...." PRO.Po P- ERTY lOCA 1iI,THE EAST SiOE TO BOULEVA~ ; Olio POSltE Ii... OF '22 AVENU EC- TION 28, 1. 41 SOUT'H, RA COllieR FLORIDA. Petition CO~2007-AR- ,U977, Big CQrktctew'IS. land Fife ==. OlsI'Iol b~ .ob.rtL~.,\lCI>,.! Hole Montes-' i.~"J1J're- qu."lng a. M. o..i Use allowed'. 'lfii'ib. tates (E) zontng .dtatrict pursuant t,o"Se-Cfto-ri ~.Ol;03.CU.e.o', the .t..and Developm.nt-Cotfti (LOC). The .,.... {E) zoned ,'" .ts~ro. . posed for a '. . ice Fadlfb' , - a: FI'. Sla"on and Admin. Istratlon Building not to exceed 17,642 square feet. The -SUbJ&ct site 15 located on 6.5 acres In the' north eat. comer of Desoto Boulevar4 NOrth and the proposed' 22nd Avenue H.E.. Golden .. ...ie 1....'4t.rIP. .u c..._, < . ' OlllirGOUfJtY:, I 7A N01'E:lllI___ .lng to .....k..onanr ~. :,e*,,1:~"" ~ =:"orti: =a : Item to bAt .re.stlct; .'ndlvldult.. ".~ers wltl ,beUmlttct,to5:'mtmqs. L~n~~!\~~ .sPMk . on 'behalf 0; .~ =::~~orln::o: nlz~"DY th. CIWr:. a "UlO"'''I~~~'for 'I ,S":=r~ Item, ~~.~~!#\l"g,g ~:t~ii.ili4;.~ \. .te_pack~ fl'm .,r t said '1nI.terI ''8: of:3 =:~t:~~ MSb1~!If~ shall b.~tted to the appropriate County staff a ml,r1Jmum of $ev. ~.~~t,,-1o-.-.tha f:J\< uH'4'lh"'p~~: tlons before the Board will become a ptrma. nent Part of the record. Any perso.IL ~() deeJd. I :f ~:~!f::.r=o~, recofd7tlt.~. ~'~-=~lhereIO 10 ens-M'hal . t= tlmreet>r'dof_1 pro- ceadlng. . . WhICh' NCord,lnc . ,t t....;j lImonyond "" ~'n"'! ~on . WItIch the'ilp*t Is based. tfyou are a person with a (Usability whO needs any actO"""". In !~fd!~lri. f~ .000~.tn you,. ~:~tt' ~~.;.,~..~: ~:~li~~{~3~{li ~~a'.~'~~'I~ ..k..U: devl_,'fGl'\., : ng Impil'lNd. . a. ble ~~,~~- ~8~:Slg~~Rio,.,nY COlliER COUNTY, ~~~~~G::~~'t: Cl.lRK .. r cT:r" Pm_ DeP. -= NO.l670116 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO ? A THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exce tion of the Chairman's si ature, draw a line thrau h routin lines #1 throu #4, com lete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson line #S . Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date List in routin order (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact stafffor additional or missing information. All original documents needing the BCe Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the BCC office only after the BCC has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Staff Contact Agenda Date Item was A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached I.J 2. c 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION Phone Number Agenda Item Number Number of Original Documents Attached INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/ A'. in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a TO riate. I. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters. must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.) 2. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board 3. The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval ofthe document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a Iicable. 4. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si alure and initials are re uired. 5. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCe's actions are nullified. Be w eo our deadlines! 6. The document was approved by the BCC on enter date) and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The Coun Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Ucable. ~~o~ I: Forms! County Forms! BCe Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revis d 1.2605, R vised 2.24.05 ~: at - 7aJ7-frR-lI0l7 ~.&14 "-J z:t m\ Y\. 'RYe ~Cl-- I ?A MEMORANDUM Date: March 4, 200S To: Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner Zoning & Land Development Reivew From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Resolution 2008-50 CU-2007-AR-11977 Big Corkscrew Fire Station & Administration Enclosed please find one copy of the document referenced above, Agenda Item #7A, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. The original document will be kept as part of the Board's permanent record. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-S4ll. Thank you. Enclosure ? A ;..~~ RESOLUTION NO. 08- 50 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A FIRE STATION AND ADMINISTRATION BUILDING IN THE ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, SECTION 2.01.03.G.1.e., FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DESOTO BOULEVARD NORTH, OPPOSITE AND NORTH OF 22 A VENUE NE, IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection ofthe public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use for a fire station and administration building in the Estates (E) Zoning District, pursuant to Land Development Code Section 2.01.03.G.1.e. on the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A") that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 10.08.00.D of the Land Development Code, as amended; and . WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that: Petition CU-2007-AR-11977, filed by Robert L. Duane, AICP of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, an Independent Special District and Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Page 1 of2 ?A The South 180 feet of Tract liS, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 72, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 8, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, and The North ISO feet of Tract liS, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 72, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 8, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida is hereby approved for a Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.01.03.G.l.e of the Collier County Land Development Code in the Estates (E) Zoning District, for a fire station and administration building in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan found in Exhibit "B" and subject to the conditions found in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super-majority vote, this '2foday of ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT~,#~J<;CLERK .. \.. . ,> ......~ -'" './.!:<.~~~.\ BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: , Chairman Exhibits (attached): A. Findings of Fact B. Conceptual Site Plan, entitled, "Big Corkscrew Island & Rescue District #14," dated 1/07, which is prepared by Hole Montes, Inc. C. Conditions Item # fA Page 2 of2 Agenda ~ 7-lc,( c€, Date Date -zhs ic6 ~ eputy Clerk ~ 7A "'1 '.,1 , FINDINGS OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-11977 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes / No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes /' No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: _ No affect or V Affect mitigated by '1n . 11' ,,-s ,v'-Q\v'c..*,~,~. ~~kt( _ Affect cannot be mitigated ~ } D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes L No _~A ~<:" J o~ Vkl h^ 7l\..*'''\.. Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. ClWRMANA\ AI\, DATE: 1('\."\-0; EXHIBIT A 7A FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-11977 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. B. Consistency ~nd Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No Ingress and egress to propeliy and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress ~ress Yes /' No C. boring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor No affect or ~ Affect mitigated by ~ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Yes Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. MEMB~-f DATE: /I~ If r-(J 7 EXHIBIT A .. -7' A ' ...G " & FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-11977 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes r; No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes tli No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: ~ No affect or _ Affect mitigated by _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes ~ No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, wit tipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE:--dIS-h MEMBER: EXHIBIT A ?A FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-11977 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: '" Yes' ----No -+r- B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes~ No_ C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: ~o affect or _ Affect mitigated by _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes~ No_ Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulatiohs, (c (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: / /1..;/0 7 r I / / " /' :--? MEMBE~/ ~ / Z . /' / c//~-< /0 T/ / EXHIBIT A /--uLJ p;e.-,T ---- ~ 7A '..- FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-11977 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08,00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency 11 the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and a cess in case of fire or catastrophe: Yes No c. / Arects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor ef cts: _ No affect or _ Affect mitigated by _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: . Compatible use hithin district Yes j No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, 'th stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: II Ii 0 EXHIBIT A I 7 A FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-11977 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes J No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes J No c. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or _ Affect mitigated by _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district yes-0o_ Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE II I J 4 I () -) MEMBER'~ ~ EXHIBIT A fA FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-1l977 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes ~ No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes Vi No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: / No affect or _ Affect mitigated by _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes ( No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: /1/15/07 I / MEMBER: ;/3vnfVL... 1......2LA f!aJLd---1"L..J EXHIBIT A Yt1 \ FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007- AR-11977 The following facts are found: I. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes V No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes 1/ No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: v" No affect or _ Affect mitigated by _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes '\-/ No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: /(n/5--:'(") 7 MEMBER: / L;--L' / c--z.. -~ I'?LI / EXHIBIT A . I .. . m , Jl Gi ~ m." 0 . (Jl_ . OJlO , cmJl mO" CO(Jl (jj~g -iJlm ~O~ " -i r (jj . ..SlOr - > -I>- Z C , I" , H~! I ~"'~~. , I ~ ~ ~ '" " ,,'~~ - - '" " ! m >< :I: Cll =4 Cll ~ei I~ b ~~i ifid~<o : e:"i3.! , ~n . '" ',i~ ?! II' ",i ~;~H --_.....-.~- ilQ!i~ ill!iF '1'1'1 i~ . ~I:lai~ ajlil~ '!I' Q"l: 11,; \l;i ! j~ ..I. ~lr 'j "I i' , , ~ ~~ I ~H ,. " i' N ~; : ~ ~ ill Q ~ ~ !,,, ! ~ "lilj il ,l~ n ~o .... ~~~'- . 9 .!HI!IHiH!~ ;t .. a ''jII' "";;I ~ 1 i ..n--I""I i ,-DH filo'- ! .. HI If: ........?,<. ' l' !! I I . I . I . . , . . . ~ ~ ~ i, i~~~ii~~ii~ia i j I . . . . . . . I . ~ . . i:l!"I";:t~l:l;:~~;;~~ 5 i i >l ii !O l; ~ .. .. Ii .. 10 ~ ~ ~ ~ f6 . ~ III ~ m ~ " ~ 8 z ,0 . . Ul ~ ~ ~ ::s " . ~ lo , 0 , ~ m , ~ , , ! !~ll ~l.l ~ ~~lil~ .ot'" 2 ;ill j'! ~ ,0'1 l~" '~'" l!e ~ ~i'~~ i:i'~ ~Qi~ !~ili ! II ~ g 11:0 loo Ulz ""'0 m_ ,,""' rno -z ""')> m... ""c: "'rn ~m ij!iHII~11 i!!l.a,b ~'>l'l'i," 'I' ~ i ~ 'j" ~..; c I ! Ii, iI i ~ i ~ i: ... 'f'.~ 'I ~ l'.l Ii"' ,i III i~ j' ll' \' ~ ' < III hl- Ih I \' i ~o I, ~ II ; ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ o "tI.;., . 0 ~ - , LP g, J. ~ ~ I ! ~ ~ ~ ~i = ~ ~ ~ ~ "~z!il ~ IISl;~i9 ~ lli ~ ;I!a < . I 1.~ ~ m ~ 6 ~; , , . III .1, ;ltc ~'.IoC1\I"''''1<. PIIQP<lSDlAC1Ij,tL_.34.1I' ?A ~ ~: ----~-i--------- , , , I I , , , , , .../ ',~ ,/ ---",.- ZONING E - IE states) _n______ ~!!'~-l"-f!~------ ---:"~"-~-(~O-O~-~I~~-;;;)---- ~ IIJ ~ \i~ ~ lAI I II.~ \ DESOTO BL VD'k1'r~\,,' ",k-;';'~ .. ".. .. --~~----~~~-------~~ -----------...~ 'm'_________ =-- IP<O<W"'" PR<PO!EIl_l&.J' ". :1 Ii ~ 'i1~ :;: i I ~", c ~'f '~ i'l . 0; ., : I , -0 > . . ~ ~ I I : ~ . ~ " " , ~0 . si ! 0 I I " !: ~ , . 0 " , ~ - . e ~ ! 0 ,',. --~-mli \ ~ : ~ I c I, 1 -' c: }: Ul , m : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , SOl11l1'tO"W [XI';Tl/lG"/'" SOO'lI',o-w J30.00'I':IJO.OII.... - - SOO'9'10'Wl~00' -llIO.oo' W5~"~ "/'II , , , : -- -- --7----' ~ 1"";"--------- ~~ --- ( : t'il I,: 1\" o::{~ t elQJ : :11: !Ii I),! : IS I: ~ 6'" a I \ I( _________.1 : 1.;....- -.......,. T : ------ -+ '-'-' I ~~ I \ ",= ~ ! i II, I : ..1 I i I _"iii rn H - 11: )> " ~ -< ~ ~ > ~ .: II -, " , N o Z Z " !m I' m ~ il" r;N !!!oN ~ a. i~ <'.m 5Z C m Z m "-1' !~~l- : " , , , , , , , " " , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ~ II , , , , , , , , , , , , , " " , , , , , ~ ~ . ' , , , , , 'N' ,0 z, "z ." .'Im '-''lI ::II! o ~. .' ~~!C " ,i,~~-;; -- it' lillll-- =. ,~ ,m .,-. '. , ',.' "m'. '~ ."'S'.,' .CD'" '_-lI) ,-, '.; '- " ' El; : , , . , , , , , , " . 'i~!. ,h- "j. If '<::;1Q . 'n. j"'li I!~I \ , , , , " " i: I' , , , , tr- [l " " IHJDQi lD"lJ " "lJ" ~ ~2 ~ ~2l 16 g~ 0 ~~ ~ 8 ~ ~~ 0 c g ~ ~ ~> ' ? ~ ~ )> ~ ~ ;:; ~ ~ Noo'J,'JO'E l~.oo' mOa~OlI' (;) ZONING A-MHO 1_.-......' -E;C;sn;G-~/w----" i!~ ;2~~ Ii: _.j '!: ,. " , , !~:-z . . ~ J N o Z Z " !m 3' .... . , , m ~ ;; r; !!. ~. :'. . III i' ~ ~ I :II h!! H ~ ~i:l ~lii8 !,,'~ II.. lSl ~ ::p. j" I CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL FOR 7A CU-2007-AR-11977 1. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the Master Site Plan, identified as "Conditional Use Master Site Plan," prepared by Hole Montes, Inc., dated January, 2007. The site plan noted is conceptual in nature for conditional use approval. The final design must be in compliance with all applicable federal, state and county laws and regulations. The Department of Zoning and Land Development Review Director may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by this conditional use, so long as these minor changes remain consistent with all applicable development standards. 2. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this conditional use approval, or major changes to the approved plan, shall require the submittal of a new conditional use application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Chapter 10.02.03, Site Development Plan (SDP) review and approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 04-41, as amended. 3. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low-pressure sodium lamps are encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged. a. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a "cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area. b. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated. 4. Along Desoto Boulevard and 22nd Avenue N.E., 30 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated to Collier County, at no cost, in exchange for relieving the Big Corkscrew Fire District of turn lane requirements along Desoto Boulevard and nnd Avenue N.E. EXHIBIT C G: Current! Gundlach/ Conditional Uses/ Big Corkscrew Fire Admin. Bldg. /Exhibit C Conditions 2-26-08 78 I..' COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: xxx Normal Legal Advertisement Other: (Display Adv., location, etc.) ******.**.*...*..***.......*...****..****.......*~*...**** * Originating Dept! Div: Conun.Dev.Serv./Plannin Petition No. (If none, give brief descriptio ......~:;:..\.:.i~.:.~ Petitioner: <Name & Address): Stephen J. Fleming, P.E., 20623 East Goidenelm Drive, Estero, FI. 33928 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Mohammed M. Rahman, 13056 Valewood Dr., Naples, Fl. 34119 Hearing before Bee BZA Other Requested Hearing date: Based onadvertisementapp_' Newspaper(s) to he used: (Complete only if important): XXX Naples Daily News Other Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: ' ohammed M. Rahman, represented by Stephen J. Fieming, P.E., requesting a variance from ectlon . . S. . 0 teL C to reduce the lot width along the north and south property line from the required 150 feet to 135 feet, and to reduce the side yard setback along the west property line from the required 40 feet to 25 feet to pennit an automobile service station. The subject property is located at 2393 Lake Trafford Road, Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Coliier County, Florida. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: ~eadvertisingCost? Yes No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: Approved by: i,s(a< ate County Manager Date DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BeC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: County Manager agenda file: to Requesting Division Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. ...........................................................*........**...................... FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Receiv___ Date of pUbliChearin____ Date Advertised~f, RESOLUTION 08- 78 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER VA-2006-AR-lOO92, FOR A 15-FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED 150-FOOT LOT WIDTH TO 135 FEET AND A 15-FooT VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED 40- FOOT SIDE YARD SE113ACK TO 25 FEET FOR A PROPOSED AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION LOCATED AT 2393 LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD, AS FURTHER HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a puhlic hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a ] 5-foot variance from the required ISO-foot lot width requirement to 135 feet, and a 15-foot variance from the required 40-foot side yard setback to 25 feet, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Sections 5.05.05. and 9.04.00 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, aU interested parties have been given opportunity to he heard hy this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that Petition VA-2006-AR-IOOn filed by Stephen J. Fleming, P.E. of SJF and Associates, Inc., representing Mohammed M. Rahman, with respect to a proposed automobile service station on property located at 2393 Lake Trafford Road, lmmokaJee, Florida, as further described in the attached Exhibit B, be and the same hereby is approved for a 15-foot variance from the required 150-foot lot width requirement to 135 feet, and a IS-foot variance from the required 40-foot side yard setback to 25 feet as shown on the attached site plan. Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: Page I of2 78 1. The 15-foot variances granted are limited to the side yard encroachment for the proposed convenience store along the west property boundary and to a 15- foot lot width reduction, as depicted in the applicant's submitted site plan dated February 14, 2007, included as Exhibit A. 2. In addition to the required landscaping on the outside of the S-foot high wall, the inside of the wall shall be landscaped with a sinsle ruw 3-foot minimum high hedge planted a minimum of 3 feet on center and maintained at a minimum height of 5 feet. 3. There shall be no outdoor speakers except for those required by a governing authority. 4. Tbe hours of business operation are limited from 5 a.m. to 11 p.m. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number V A- 2006-AR-10092 he recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion. second and majority vote, this _ day of ,200S. ATTEST: DWlGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: , CHAIRMAN , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~jeffrey A. K1atzkow - \) Chief Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Plan dated February 14, 2007 Exhibit B - Legal Description Pase 2 of2 B I ":i '1IIi1iii'1l1!:11 ::"111111' ! I!, ! _j .!!'il~ p, :. 'Il, ~ i !:i~ ~. ;;;!ili~~:~l~i ~!; &1 =11 . ad' !t~~..~l;".II,':l1{ .~...< "lI:!1 1I l"'-,~ lL(.."'fl\&~Il~I-" ,~a l, ' ~; ~l!I'!.:'1 1'"".. $ 1; i'< .! ! I~~~ i~ ~~ $i~!{;i~~l ~! ~'! ~: I..:;! '.''"''''I"..llo1r I.' \' ~ "i I~" -..Il ~ P, .. j :: J.. l::~i .; lIC.lI<l\;::~ ';" 'u. -.!i . I '1,,;II,I";i;~ II 11 .: ~ i "1..1 "If ,~ j!:l ~,~ t.o: '" ., ->~} ~ ;liiil,i;;il!i!iiil!!1 ;~I j h. -~ s.!S '! - !" .. ~. .... I 'I ,- ~ .... -. I ..........)..-- l: .... ~--""f.... .... !, i11ii111! ' J I!~_+l ~ '!I ~ if,l. i I "l' " !ill~ : ,; 1~ . · 1'1 ii ; IlJ: i[ I ~L~_~ -=. ~ f \~ Ir..!;........"..'.". '''Wj'!f~fi~i!1 jlll'l:IU!!!jl i, I,Jli~J!1 Ill" f: .... .; ,;. , -.,' 11 ~ ~".;'''''''''' -~-_.........-.-.. .... ,~,e ~~ .... I-~~l "'t m II ~ . - I 1....\ [ . ~ ......J . ~j It t\ " , " 1111, ;11l' . , g' liG ili " ....... i~ ; . '" ~ >,.J I , " ----{-~-~(ii"iJWI--~- " 1+ "'" - t!~, "to- .... ~i z ~m ~ e 0 '" 0 il m r'1 "" 0 r'1 ~~u ~ c i~ iln R r'1 ~. ~" ~~~ U) ;!l;;jn u> ~~ "" r .~.~ss r'1 !~ . il i~ 0 ,I e~n ~~ :; ~ !~ I '" .c. 'i> ~; s~s~ z . . () " ~ ~ f"l ~ i ~~..~ ~}~' ,c ~~ ~:I~ n I (fJ ~ 1- lJ~.i . ,-:;,...,..., I !~(I:~r'~ i '~~I ~.".. S1R~ fCl. n~u-n-UXll~J(Ull MINI-SUPERMARKET Loke Trafford Rood, Immokolee, FL CONCEPTU.....L SIT[ PLAN STEI'H(~ J. FLEMING 6: ASSOOAlES. INC. ._s._......_-.._.....,.. _1"'1_' ,..(...j....._ Q~"""'T CHl:0<aI1' _~n S.f 5J' S.f' 0"11 ~"o.ott:r ..UwKII EXHIBIT "A" 18 '. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Description of parcel lying in the East Yz of the Northeast Y. of the Southwest Y. of Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. Commencing at the Northeast comer of the East Yz ofthe Northeast Y. of the Southwest Y. of Section 32, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida, run South 88049'30" West 663.40 feet; thence South 01"03'30" East 39.37 feet to the Point of Beginning, said point being at the Intersection of the West line of said East Yz of the Northeast Y. of Southwest Y. and the South line of Lake Trafford Road; thence continue South 01003'30" East 290.63 feet; thence North 89001'00. East 135.00 feet to the West boundary of Warden Lane; thence North 01003'30" West 290.59 feet along said West boundary to the South boundary of Lake .Trafford Road; thence South 89003'30. West 135.00 feet along said boundary to the Point of Beginning. EXHIBIT "B" ?B .".:,.. January 17,2008 Attn: Legals Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Petition V A-2006-AR-10092: Mini-Supermarket Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced petition on Sunday, January 27, 2008 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk P.O./Account # 113-138312-649110 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 18 Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 12, 2008, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition VA-2006-AR-10092, Mohammed M. Rahman, represented by Stephen J. Fleming, P.E., requesting a variance from Section 5.05.05.B of the LDC to reduce the lot width along the north and south property line from the required 150 feet to 135 feet, and to reduce the side yard setback along the west property line from the required 40 feet to 25 feet to permit an automobile service station. The subject property is located at 2393 Lake Trafford Road, Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts 'eOlli1tyof Collier \,~ CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY d:OURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI l(~AIL EAST P.O. B01( 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDAtlI01-30~4 ... ?B Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds January 17,2008 Mohammed M. Rahman 13056 Valewood Drive Naples, FL 34119 RE: V A-2006-AR-10092: Mini-Supermarket Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 12, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, January 27, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK. Ann~~O~~~ Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.clerk.coIlier.tl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerkia1clerk.collier.tl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts .,eOl:lI1ty pf C6l1ier L-' CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY d::OURT~OUSE 330 I T AMIAMI 1(\l,AIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA ':t1]() 1-30~4 -, 78 ~'i Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds January 17,2008 Stephen J. Fleming, P.E. 20623 East Goldenelm Drive Estero, FL 33928 RE: V A-2006-AR-I0092: Mini-Supermarket Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 12, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, January 27, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK llu...u- ~,Q.e. Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.t1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk\alclerk.collier.t1.us Ann P. Jennejohn '?8 To: Subject: legals@naplesnews.com VA-2006-AR-10092 Mini-Supermarket Attachments: VA-2006-AR-1 0092.doc; VA-2006-AR-1 0092.doc Good Morning, Please advertise the attached on Sunday, January 27, 2008. ~ ~ VA-2006-AR-10092 .doc (24 KB) VA-2006-AR-10092 .doc (23 KB) Thank you, Ann Senior Clerk to the Board Minutes & Records Department 252-8406 (ann.jennejohn@coll ierclerk.com) 78 "'-I Ann P. Jennejohn From: Sent: To: Subject: postmaster@collierclerk.com Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:55 AM Ann P. Jennejohn Delivery Slatus Notification (Relay) Attachments: ATT190644.txt; VA-2006-AR-10092 Mini-Supermarket [J" :~';;- ,""" 1:::-::1 L.:::J ATT190644.txt (229 B) VA-2006-AR-10092 Mini-Supermar.... . This IS an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients. but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. legals@naplesnews.com 1 V A-2006-AR-l 0092 Mini-Supermarket Page 1 of 1 78 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Riley, Becky [BRiley@Naplesnews.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1: 15 PM To: Ann P. Jennejohn Subject: RE: VA-2006-AR-10092 Mini-Supermarket ok From: Ann P. Jennejohn [mailto:AnnJennejohn@collierclerk.com] Posted At: Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:55 AM Posted To: Legals Done - NDN Conversation: VA-2006-AR-10092 Mini-Supermarket Subject: VA-2006-AR-10092 Mini-Supermarket Good Morning, Please advertise the attached on Sunday, January 27, 2008. <<V A-2006-AR-1 0092.doc>> <<VA-2006-AR-10092.doc>> Thank you, Ann Senior Clerk to the Board Minutes & Records Department 252-8406 (ann.j ennej ohn@collierclerk.com) 1/22/2008 Th.Th, NAPLES DAILY NEWS Pubhshed Dailv Naples. FL .j.j 1112 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida County of Collier Beforc thc undcrsigned Ihcy scrvc as thc authority, pcrsonally appeared B.,Lamb, who on oath says that thcy sef\e as thc Assistant Corporatc Seerctary of the Naples Daily, a daiiy newspaper pubhshed at Naples, in Colher County, Florida: distributed in Collicr and Lee countics of Florida: that the attached copy of the advertising, being a PUBLIC NOTICE 111 the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE was published in said nc\vspapcr I time in the issue On Januarv 27'''. 200g \nlant (llther savs lh,lt Ih.:: said N~plcs Daily \"c\Vs i~ a n.::wspapcr Puhlished at Naples. in collier county, Florida and that the said ncwspapcr has herdofofc been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida~ distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matkr at the post omc.:: in i\aples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of I y<,ar I1c:\1 preceding the firs! puhlication oflhe attached copy of adver1iscmcnL and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised allY 1l<.;r~OIl, finn 01 ..:orporati\>ll any di.~~:()unL rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for pnbli"t"'" ;).";~:7~ ( Signatufc of aman!) Sworn to and subsenbed before Ille This 27"'. ]),jy or January 2008 I". - (S;g;li~~;/~~taT)' pu~L'<'&>0 FEI5lJ-2578:l27 ,""~"f"" i~~'!I''' ~~, ~*: :*: ~~' .{.:i '.:~ '.0'1:-,. "'.9~.f"", JUDY JANES Commission DD 675029 Expires May 16, 2011 !londed llmJ r ray F~ln IflSuranoe I~Olhlll.5-701 S ,." 7 B 01. ...... .. ........ DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLE~~, lerk 8Y:Ann~nne)otm.De~~1 C IAlYlJllnI . Nn la::nfl'11 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing stip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Ofiice only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the ex tion of the Chairman's si -nature, draw a line thrall h roulin lines # I thrall #4, com lete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson line #5 . Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date List in routin order 2. 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk ofCourl's Office / 78 , f"f \. J. u,. of' PRIMARY CONT ACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item. Phone Number Agenda Item Number Number of Original Documents Attached 252- INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/ A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate. I. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. 1hat have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.) 2. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board 3. The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. 4. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si ature and initials are re uired. 5. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the Bee's actions are nullified. Be aware 0 our deadlines! 6. The document was approved by the BCC on enter date) and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in th attached document. The Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable. ~:cYt:s~c~r:Me~Jr!22~~so~~'~, Revised 2605. Revised 2.24.05 f13 ., , MEMORANDUM Date: March 4, 2008 To: Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner Zoning & Land Development Reivew From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Resolution 2008-51 V A-2006-AR-I0092 Mini-Supermarket Enclosed please find one copy of the document referenced above, Agenda Item #7B, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. The original document will be kept as part of the Board's permanent record. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-8411. Thank you. Enclosure "18 RESOLUTION 08- ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER VA-2006-AR-I0092, FOR A IS-FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED ISO-FOOT LOT WIDTH TO 135 FEET AND A IS-FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED 40- FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK TO 25 FEET FOR A PROPOSED AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION LOCATED AT 2393 LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD, AS FURTHER HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a IS-foot variance from the required ISO-foot lot width requirement to 135 feet, and a IS-foot variance from the required 40-foot side yard setback to 25 feet, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Sections 5.05.05. and 9.04.00 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that Petition VA-2006-AR-I0092 filed by Stephen J. Fleming, P.E. of SJF and Associates, Inc., representing Mohammed M. Rahman, with respect to a proposed automobile service station on property located at 2393 Lake Trafford Road, Immokalee, Florida, as further described in the attached Exhibit B, be and the same hereby is approved for a IS-foot variance from the required ISO-foot lot width requirement to 135 feet, and a IS-foot variance from the required 40-foot side yard setback to 25 feet as shown on the attached site plan, Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: Page I of2 ?B ,~ 1. The 15- foot variances granted are limited to the side yard encroachment for the proposed convenience store along the west property boundary and to a 15- foot lot width reduction, as depicted in the applicant's submitted site plan dated February 14,2007, included as Exhibit A. 2. In addition to the required landscaping on the outside of the 8-foot high wall, the inside of the wall shall be landscaped with a single row 3-foot minimum high hedge planted a minimum of 3 feet on center and maintained at a minimum height of 5 feet. 3. There shall be no outdoor speakers except for those required by a governing authority. 4. The hours of business operation are limited to 5 a.m. to II p.m. 5. "NO LOITERING" signs shall be posted in appropriate locations on the building and in the parking area. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number V A- 2006-AR-10092 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote, this 2w day of FeIovuavy ,2008. . .-~ L,,~;, .,,~~ ~.It.gr~i;:'-~. ATTEST,.\ \ " ""'. 'C", J,)' '. <iO,. DWI9.HT~. BRDCk.WRK Qj~~~~~8f2t ~L Atttst..to..Ch<<(~puty Clerk 11...tn.l~.' App ved as to form and gal ffi i BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COL.LIEYOUNTY FLORID~ By: .:JfJ1-- TOM HENNING, CHAIRM Jeffre Chief nty Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Plan dated February 14,2007 Exhibit B - Legal Description Item # --'J.b. Page 2 of2 ,,:.. il\ .."_.~--~.J. .\'- " ..;.-_~~"^....<"~ 't., 'q, (A'C':-, \ .~_........ . t' ',.kl:.<\\ ,'.........._ ~:..,~"".. il~; .... .,,,,,---..-,--....- ~ €Hi l;~ ~ !~i= ~~ i g~,Ii~ ~~~ i ~~ 1;' ~ l!. ~:;''i '!: ,,;:l~-.. ~ ..~j\.! i1 t. ~ ~ U".; z i' ~ !~i~~lii:!n;~~ t,8;i'i"l~.l~~;"fjOE" f .~~;f\(~~_~.. i~~ Ii i i!:._~~ Il".;'; _~. ~ l( ...~ :;~~;~~~H;~~~~ iJ "~.~~"'~ "'h!!i~"'" l!lmmm!~ ~~ ":U...l( ~ ~ Eit; "~li "'!', ~,," I'i." f~l-l ,: ." ~~ ~~~ i~ i1 R"' ~s. ::;$ ~'" '!" ..' .. -~ f,"1 :ti-" ~<;. -~fi ~~ t: , ~~.~lj;lI~~~~'-StH.' ~!i iitii.~~it~~i;i ~~~$~~ 1J~t.t' ~i....~~-!i hiil !i~)'i~ ~H'I-!~ shr ~i ,. ~ t:~ ~,"l>\ ." ...~r- ;,%l -~~~- "'~.,. r;;>-" '., :l; ~; ~~ !i 1.~ '.' I.; !r.:!~-<,*,~..".". ijimi.\~i~B~:~~ ;~ t~;~JI~~~'l~~~fi i-<~i.ni;~~~~ ~ ~n~,tid~ lf~~ ,;;~ 1f'l ~ t' i i ! ! '+.,. \- ~:~. " ,. " ~.=e " ~l .~, ~ ':;'.~ . --)~.i " IV!.. ~ l"j! . ~ \!u r __.-----1i j" i . " II 1\' , ii!!! ~~~ij~ ~ ' " ~, . ,., " .... '.... '" ! ------{-~-~~-~-~--- " " .. z (j) ~~ ~~~:Il e ~< 0 fTl .~ ...; ~-<~~ ...; 0< u << fTl ~~-<-< OJ .' ~~ (j) 001010 )> rn~ W=;<:ll;l ~o ~l= ~i'i''f n .m m~ ^ ~l .0 ;;::.,,~g .. mm."." (j) .m ....,~$m o. i~ ~~ h'~ ffie ~~~i ~~~ ~. ~~ ~~ z, ~bl~O ~8 ~~ <>.,,"':: .0 ;;::mill~ <0 ~~ .s ~. ~.~~ ~z f II 0 ~ . ~ ~ ~ " o ~,I (j) ~ ~.. \J ~ J z {(f!r~) i .,.,..Y~; I ,.~,!...~,. lake STll/lPNO. xx-xx-xx-xxxx-xxu MINI-SUPERMARKET Trafford Road, Immokolee, FL CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN ''" ...... EXHIBIT "A" rr~l~-~~rl' ~~ I~i ! ~: K~"' i j i i J li!!-j..q-j I . :~: , ,-;'- i i i I ~,' i ~ ~ lii~, ,"'" Iii' !Hi ~ -l"._.~__.l.:i ..l'. 'I!. ! 1 ~! .I!. 1~ ,1:1 i I i'~ ~ i ;... ~i ~ i ~ i ~I,: \ ' ~ ,.; :: ' ~ I ~', :'~~L._,___L-.:u_.u II { \" fB / " liG iI! " ~~ \Ii "- iil\ ,~ '''ILl' ~ I" i o ::0 fTl o C fTl (j) ...; fTl o < )> ::0 )> Z n fTl ~~~~ ~~ ~5~ ~~~ ;:;~~ ~;;!m ~~~ .m ~m ~~ < . . c < 'I ! ~: =-=- REVISIONS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Description of parcel lying in the East Yz of the Northeast Yo of the Southwest Yo of Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. Commencing at the Northeast corner of the East Yz of the Northeast Yo of the Southwest X of Section 32, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida, run South 88049'30" West 663.40 feet; thence South 01003'30" East 39.37 feet to the Point of Beginning, said point being at the intersection of the West line of said East Yz of the Northeast Y. of Southwest Yo and the South line of Lake Trafford Road; thence continue South 01003'30" East 290.63 feet; thence North 89001'00" East 135.00 feet to the West boundary of Warden Lane; thence North 01003'30" West 290.59 feet along said West boundary to the South boundary of Lake .Trafford Road; thence South 89003'30" West 135.00 feet along said boundary to the Point of Beginning. EXHIBIT "B" 78' 8A January 31, 2008 Attn: Legals Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: BCC-LDC AD Dear Legals: Please publish the following public notice, for a Display, V. page, with map attached, in your edition of Saturday, February 16, 2008 and furnish proof of publication of advertisement to the Collier County Community Development and Environmental Services Building, Department of Zoning and Land Development Review, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104, Attention: Heather Ramirez and PLEASE SEND DUPICATE ORIGINAL to Collier County Attorneys Office, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104, Attention: Jeffrey A. Klatzkow, and also to the Board Minutes and Records Department. Thank you. Sincerely, Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk P.O./Account # 113-138312-649110 8A Department of Zoning and Land Development Review January 30, 2008 Naples Daily News 1075 Central A venue Naples, Florida 33940 ATTENTION: LEGAL ADVERTISING Dear Ms. Perrell: Please publish the following public notice, for a Display, V. page, with map attached, Legal Notice in your edition of Saturday, February 16 and furnish proof of publication of each advertisement to the Collier County Development Services Building, Department of Zoning and Land Development Review, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104, Attention: Heather Ramirez and PLEASE SEND DUPICATE ORIGINAL to Jeffrey A. Klatzkow, Esquire, CACA, Collier County Attorneys Office, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. February 26, 2008 NOTICE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHANGE LDC AMENDMENT CYCLE 2008-1a Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, February 26 at 9:00 a.m., during its regular meeting in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, 3'd Floor, Building "F," Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners proposes to take under advisement an amendment to the Collier County Land Development Code, the title of which is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, RECITALS; SECTION TWO, FINDINGS OF FACT; SECTION THREE, ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING: SECTION 1.04.04 REDUCTION OF REQUIRED SITE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS BY PROVIDING THAT AN EXISTING CONFORMING OR NON-CONFORMING LOT, PARCEL OR YARD MAY BE REDUCED IN ITS DEGREE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE WHERE A PORTION OF SAID LOT, PARCEL OR YARD IS BEING ACQUIRED FOR PRESENT OR PLANNED PUBLIC USE AND/OR PURPOSE BY COLLIER COUNTY OR ANOTHER GOVERNMENTAL 8A ENTITY OR BY A PRIVATE PARTY UNDER AN AGREEMENT WITH COLLIER COUNTY OR ANOTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY, AND PROVIDING THAT A LEGAL NON-CONFORMING LOT OR PARCEL OF LESS THAN FIVE (5) ACRES OR A CONFORMING LOT OF FIVE (5) ACRES OR MORE SHALL RETAIN ITS STATUS AS NON-CONFORMING OR CONFORMING AND ITS ELIGIBILITY TO SEVER TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS CREDITS WHERE A PORTION OF THE LOT OR PARCEL IS ACQUIRED FOR A PRESENT OR PLANNED PUBLIC USE AND/OR PURPOSE BY COLLIER COUNTY OR ANOTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR BY A PRIVATE PARTY UNDER AN AGREEMENT WITH COLLIER COUNTY OR ANOTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY; SECTION FOUR, CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; SECTION FIVE, PUBLICATION AS THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AND SECTION SIX, EFFECTIVE DATE. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ordinance are available for public inspection in the Zoning and Land Development Review Section, Community Development Services Center, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN 8A Teresa L. Polaski To: Subject: legals@naplesnews.com LDC AMendment Cycle 2008-1a Ad Attachments: BCC LDC Cycle 2008-1a.doc; LDC Amendment Cycle 2008-1 a.doc Legals, Please advertise the following on Saturday, February 16, 2008. Thank you BCC LDC Cycle LDC Amendment 200B-la.doc (29. Cycle 200B-la.do... Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners Minutes and Records Department 239-252-8411 (T eresa.Po las ki@collierclerk.com) 8A Teresa L. Polaski From: Sent: To: Subject: postmaster@collierclerk.com Monday, February 04, 2008 8: 19 AM Teresa L. Polaski Delivery Status Notification (Relay) Attachments: ATT649057.txt; LDC Amendment Cycle 2008-1a Ad D" , [J ATT649057.txt (231 B) LDC Amendment Cycle 200B-la Ad... This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. legals@naplesnews.com I LDC Amendment Cycle 2008-1 a Ad Page I of I 8A Teresa L. Polaski From: Sent: To: Perrell, Pam [PPerrell@Naplesnews.com] Monday, February 04, 2008 9:14 AM Teresa L. Polaski Subject: RE: LDC Amendment Cycle 2008-1a Ad OK From: Teresa L. Polaski [mailto:Teresa.Polaski@collierclerk.com] Posted At: Monday, February 04,20088:19 AM Posted To: Legals - NDN Conversation: LDC Amendment Cycle 2008-1a Ad Subject: LDC Amendment Cycle 2008-1a Ad Legals, Please advertise the following on Saturday, February 16, 2008. Thank you <<BCC LDC Cycle 2008-1 a.doc>> <<LDC Amendment Cycle 2008-1 a.doc>> Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners Minutes and Records Department 239-252-8411 (T eresa.Po laski@collierclerk.com) 2/4/2008 t B A ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNA TURE Plint on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the excention of the Chairman's sicrnature, draw a line throup-h routinlf lines #1 throuph #4, comnlete the checklist, and fOlWard to Sue Filson line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Iuitials Date (List in routinO' order) 1. 2. 3. 4. Catherine Fabacher, LDC Manager Zoning & Land Development Review CAF 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending BCC approval. NormalJy the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact infonnation is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the BCC Chainnan's signature are to be delivered to the BCC office only after the BCC has acted to approve the item) Name of Primary Staff Catherine Fabacher, LDC Manager Phone Number 252-2322 Contact Agenda Date Item was February 26, 2008 Agenda Item Number 8-A Aooroved bv the BCC Type of Document Ordinance dDD~ -t 0 Number of Original One Attached Documents Attached 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signedlinitialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed hy the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executcd by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC oftjce within 24 hours of BCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the Bee's actions are nullifIed. Be aware of your deadlines! Tbe document was approved by tbe BCC oU 2/19/08 and all cbanges made duriug tbe meetiug bave heeu incorporated in tbe attached document. The County Attoruey's Office has reviewed the chao es, if a Iicable. CAF Yes (Initial) CAF N/A(Not A licable) 2. CAF 3. CAF 4. CAF 5. CAF 6. I: Formsl County Fonns/ BCC Fonnsl Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 04-COA-OI t9011116 ORDINANCE NO. 08-~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, RECITALS; SECTION TWO, FINDINGS OF FACT; SECTION THREE, ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING: CHAPTER 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS, INCLUDING SECTION 1.04.04 REDUCTION OF REQUIRED SITE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS; SECTION FOUR, CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; SECTION FIVE, PUBLICATION AS THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AND SECTION SIX, EFFECTIVE DATE. Recitals WHEREAS, on October 30, 1991, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code (hereinafter LDC), which was subsequently amended; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) on June 22, 2004, adopted Ordinance No. 04-41, which repealed and superseded Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which had an effective date of October 18, 2004; and WHEREAS, the LDC may not be amended more than two times in each calendar year unless additional amendment cycles are approved by the Collier County Board of Commissioners pursuant to Section 10.02.09 A. of the LDC; and WHEREAS, this is the second amendment to the LDC for the calendar year 2007; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 1997, the Board adopted Resolution 97-177 establishing local requirements and procedures for amending the LDC; and WHEREAS, all requirements of Resolution 97-177 have been met; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, in a manner prescribed by law, did hold an advertised public hearing on February 26, 2008 and did take action concerning these amendments to the LDC; and WHEREAS, the subject amendments to the LDC are hereby determined by this Board to be consistent with and to implement the Collier County Growth Management Plan as required by Subsections 163.3194 (1) and 163.3202 (1), Florida Statutes; and Page 1 of 6 Words struok through are deleted, words underlined are added ~ B A ~,'~ WHEREAS, this Ordinance is adopted in compliance with and pursuant to the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act (F.S. ~ 163.3161 et seq.), and F.S. ~ 125.01 (1 )(t) and (1 )(w); and WHEREAS; this Ordinance is adopted pursuant to the constitutional and home rule powers of Fla. Const. Art. VIII, ~ 1(g); and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of the law have otherwise been met. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: RECITALS The foregoing Recitals are true and correct and incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth. SECTION TWO: FINDINGS OF FACT The Board of Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. Collier County, pursuant to Sec. 163.3161, et seq., Fla. Stat., the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulations Act (herein after the "Act"), is required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan. 2. After adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, the Act and in particular Section 163.3202(1). Fla. Stat., mandates that Collier County adopt land development regulations that are consistent with and implement the adopted comprehensive plan. 3. Section 163.3201, Fla. Stat., provides that it is the intent of the Act that the adoption and enforcement by Collier County of land development regulations for the total unincorporated area shall be based on, be related to, and be a means of implementation for, the adopted comprehensive plan. 4. Section 163.3194(1)(b), Fla. Stat., requires that all land development regulations enacted or amended by Collier County be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, and any land regulations existing at the time of adoption which are not consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, shall be amended so as to be consistent. 5. Section 163.3202(3), Fla. Stat., states that the Act shall be construed to encourage the use of innovative land development regulations. 6. On January 10, 19a9, Collier County adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan (hereinafter the "Growth Management Plan" or "GMP") as its comprehensive plan pursuant to the requirements of Sec. 163.3161 et seq., Fla. Stat., and Rule 9J-5 FAC. Page 2 of 6 Words Gtruck through are deleted, words underlined are added t B A 7. Section 163.3194(1 )(a), Fla. Stat., mandates that after a comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, has been adopted in conformity with the Act, all development undertaken by, and all actions taken in regard to development orders by, governmental agencies in regard to land covered by such comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof shall be consistent with such comprehensive plan or element or portion thereof. 8. Pursuant to Sec. 163.3194(3)(a), Fla. Stat., a development order or land development regulation shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan if the land uses, densities or intensities in the cornprehensive plan and if it meets all other criteria enumerated by the local government. 9. Section 163.3194(3)(b), Fla. Stat., requires that a development approved or undertaken by a local government shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan if the land uses, densities or intensities, capacity or size, timing, and other aspects of development are compatible with, and further the objectives, policies, land uses, densities, or intensities in the comprehensive plan and if it meets all other criteria enumerated by the local government. 10. On October 30, 1991, Collier County adopted the Collier County Land Development Code, which became effective on November 13, 1991 and may be amended twice annually. The Land Development Code adopted in Ordinance 91-102 was recodified and superseded by Ordinance 04-41. 11. Collier County finds that the Land Development Code is intended and necessary to preserve and enhance the present advantages that exist in Collier County; to encourage the most appropriate use of land, water and resources consistent with the public interest; to overcome present handicaps; and to deal effectively with future problems that may result from the use and development of land within the total unincorporated area of Collier County and it is intended that this Land Development Code preserve, promote, protect and improve the public health, safety, comfort, good order, appearance, convenience and general welfare of Collier County; to prevent the overcrowding of land and avoid the undue concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate and ellicient provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, recreational facilities, housing and other requirements and services; to conserve, develop, utilize and protect natural resources within the jurisdiction of Collier County; to protect human, environmental, social and economic resources; and to maintain through orderly growth and development, the character and stability of present and future land uses and development in Collier County. 12. It is the intent of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County to implement the Land Development Code in accordance Page 3 of 6 Words 8lruck through are deleted, words underlined are added , SA SA with the provisions of the Collier County Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 125, Fla. Stat., and Chapter 163, Fla. Stat., and through these amendments to the Code. SECTION THREE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SUBSECTION 3.A. AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 1.04.04 REDUCTION OF REQUIRED SITE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Section 1.04.04 Reduction of Required Site Design Requirements, of Ordinance 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended to read as follows: * * * * * * * * * * * * 1.04.04 Reduction of Required Site Design Requirements A. No part of a required yard, required open space, required off-street parking space, or required off-street loading space, provided in connection with one building, structure, or use shall be included as meeting the requirements for any other, structure, or use, except where specific provision is made in this LDC. B. Minimum standards; nonconformities created by public acquisition. 1. All lots or yards created after the effective date of this Code [Feb. 14, 2006] must comply with the requirements then established by this Code. 2. No lot, even though it may consist of one or more abutting lots of record, or yard, existing at the effective date of this Code [Feb. 14,2006] or lawfully existing on the effective date [Feb. 14, 2006J of applicable amendments to this Code shall thereafter be reduced in its degree of compliance, including its size, dimension, or area, below the minimum requirements then set forth in this Code, except by reason of a portion thereof being acquired for present or planned public use bv the followina partv or parties: (i) Collier Countv; (Ii) another aovernmental entitv or entities includina the State of Florida, Bia Cvpress Basin, South Florida Water Manaaement District. Florida Department of Transportation and public utilitv companies providina public service; (iii) private utilitv companies providina public service; and/or (Iv) a private party or parties under an aareement with Collier County or another aovernmental entity or entities containina provisions for said private party or parties to make such acauisition and for the future transfer of ownership (fee or easement interest) to Collier County or another aovernmental entitv or entities. in any manner, including dedication, condemnation, purchase, and the like. a. Required yards on improved lots, lot area, lot coverage on improved lots, and lot dimensions rendered nonconforming or more legally nonconforming as a result of being acquired for present or planned public use by the party or parties described in B.2. above may be reduced by the same dimension, area, or amount involved in the dedication, condemnation, purchase, or similar method of acquisition for publio usa, but shall not result in a front yard of less than ten feet (10') in depth. Acoordingly, the resulting degree of nonconformity of the area and dimensions of a lot and the required yards with this Code's then current requirements will be deemed lawful unless or until the remaining lot or yard is recreated, typically by re- development, re-plat or lot re-combination, at which time such lots and yards must comply with the requirements Page 4 of 6 Words ctrucl\ through are deleted, words underlined are added 8A then established by this Code. Further, no conforming lot otherwise qualifying for a lot split or lot line adjustment pursuant to Section 10.02.02. 8.8; 10.02.02, 8.12, 1.04.04 or 9.03.03.A 5 may be denied such approval solely on the grounds that the resulting lot or lots would be less than the required minimum area for such lot(s) in the applicable zoning district as a result of acquisition, from Feb. 14, 2006. b. Other existing site related legal nonconformities, including those rendered more nonconforming as a result of acquisition for present or planned public use Qy the partv or parties described in 8.2. above and which pertain to this Code's or other county code requirements, such as, but not limited to, stormwater management, landscaping or buffers, preserves, on- or off-site parking, architectural design standards, etc., will be deemed legally nonconforming , and all such resulting nonconformities may be allowed to remain so nonconforming , unless or until the remaining lot or yard is subsequently re- created or re-developed, at which time such site related nonconformities and development must comply with the then existing requirements of this Code. c. In those circumstances where acquisition for present or planned public use, bv the partv or parties described in 8.2. above, of a portion of a lot or yard would result in one or more nonconformities that would require approval of a development order or permit in order to implement the terms of the acquisition, i.e., in order to cure or remedy the effect of an acquisition, (e.g., an SOP or building permit required to relocate a prior existing building), the County manager, or designee, is authorized to approve such development order or permit so long as any prior existing legal nonconformity of the type set forth in b. above would not be increased. d. A leqal non-conforminq lot or parcel of less than five (5) acres desiqnated as RFMU sendinq lands or otherwise eliqible for TOR severance that was in existence as of June 22. 1999. which is later reduced in size or rendered more non-conforminq as a result of a portion thereof beinq acquired for present or planned public use bv Collier Countv or another partv or parties as described in 8.2. above, mav be reduced bv the same dimension, area, or amount involved in the dedication. condemnation, purchase or similar method of acquisition and the resultinq lol(s) or parcel(s) not so acquired shall be deemed a leqal non-conforminq lot or parcel of less than five (5) acres entitled to severance of base and bonus TOR credits at a rate of 1 TOR credit per leqal non-conforminq lot or parcel pursuant to Section 2.03.07 O. 4. of the LOC. 3. A lot or parcel five (5) acres or larqer desiqnated as RFMU sendinq lands or otherwise eliqible for TOR severance. which is later reduced in size as a result of a portion thereof beinq acquired for present or planned public use bv the partv or parties described in 8.2. above. mav be reduced bv the same dimension. area. or amount involved in the dedication. condemnation. purchase or similar method of acquisition and the number of base and bonus TOR credits qenerated from such resultinq lol(s) or parcel(s) not so acquired shall be calculated pursuant to Section 2.03.07 O. 4. of the LOC based on the lot or parcel acreaqe which existed prior to the dedication, condemnation. purchase or similar method of acquisition. Page 5 of 6 Words ()truGI( through are deleted, words underlined are added SA 3~. This section may be applied to those acquisitions occurring prior to the adoption of this ordinance so long as the purchase or dedication of the property has not closed, or the condemnation proceeding relating to the property acquired has not reached final disposition. C. Other than provided for immediately above, required off-street parking shall not be reduced in area or changed to any other use unless the permitted or permissible use that it serves is discontinued or modified, or equivalent required off-street parking is provided meeting the requirements of this LDC. . . . . . . . . . . . . SECTION FOUR: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other Ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding Section not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION FIVE: INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Land Development Code of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re-Iettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION SIX: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State, Tallahassee, Florida. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 26th Day of February, 2008. ATTEST: DWIGHi E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA - -. " . . . . -. . BY:..~ ~~O.G. ~\tt &. II ... (it t ~erk , ......../.1.. Appr ad t arm and legal uf c By: TO ,Or"~ Page 6 of 6 Words Gtruok through are deleted, words underlined are added SA STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of: ORDINANCE 2008-12 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 26th day of February, 2008, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 5th day of March, 2008. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and .~lefk Ex-officio to Board of County Commission~rs ~ ~D.C. By: Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING S\.IlC 8 TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO' -7 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the lioard Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to he lorwarded to the Board Oflicc only after the l30ard has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate fllf additional signatures, dales. and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exception of the Chairman's sie:naturc, draw a line throue:h routine: lines ill throue:h #4, comolete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routing order) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder orthe original d(lCUmcnt pending Bee approvaL Normall:y the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the cxecutive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the cvent one nl"the addressecs above, including Sue Filson, need to contact stall j(lr additional or missing information. All original documents nceding the Bee Chairman's signature are to he delivered to the BCC oniee only after the Bee has acted to approve the item.) Name of Primary Staff Kay Nell, CLA Phone Number Extension B400 Contact Collier County Attorney's Office Agenda Date Item was February 26. 2008 Agenda Item Number 9B Approved by the BCC Type of Document Resolution 2008-47 N umber of Original I Attached Documents Attached 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a fO riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Otficials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Otfice and all other arties exec t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the document or the final ne Jotiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs arc placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si lI1ature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided (0 Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approyaL Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullined. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on (enter date) and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable. Yes (Initial) N/A(Not A licable) 2. 3. 4, 5, 6, r(jy N/A ~ (Q{; (~ I: Forms/ County Forms/ Bee Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04. Revised] .26.05. Revised 2.24.05 ~9B RESOLUTION NO. 2008-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO APPOINT ROBERT A. PENDERGRASS TO THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD. WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 2002-27, as amended, established the Pelican Bay Services Division Board and provides that the Board shall consist of nine (9) members with a residential interest within the Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit ("Unit"), and two (2) members with commercial/business or other interests within the Unit who are residents of Collier County; and WHEREAS, members of the Pelican Bay Service Division Board are selected by ballot from the residents of the Unit; and WHEREAS, there is currently a vacancy on this Board for a member with residential interest; and WHEREAS, Robert A. Pendergrass, resident, was elected as the next qualified candidate to serve on the Pelican Bay Service Division Board pursuant to the ballot results of March 6, 2007. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that Robert A. Pendergrass, resident, is hereby appointed to the Pelican Bay Services Division Board to fulfill the remainder of the vacant term, said term to expire on March 31, 2010. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and unanimous vote. DATED: February 26, 2008 J BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ~,:Lb- TOM HENNING, Chairman AlTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk ~.) BY:~ ~(Y"" 'Attel~ IS to' ty Clerk ........' .l~ Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: w ounty Attorney Ilem# ~ p,genda 1/2tfl....~ Date 11a1~ 1/2-1-0 ~ Reed ['Q .A-'U ) t)..-". Deputy Clerk (; CP:08-BCC-00410 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLlfl D TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 7 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Oftice only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures. dates. and/or infonnation needed. If the document is already complete with the exceotion of the Chairman's signature, draw a line through routing lines #1 through #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routine order) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONT ACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending BCe approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to he delivered to the BCC office only after the BCC has acted to approve the item.) Name of Primary Staff Kay Nell, CLA Phone Number Extension 8400 Contact Collier County Attomev's Office Agenda Date Item was February 26,2008 Agenda Item Number 9D Approved by the BCC Type of Document Resolution 2008-48 Number of Original I Attached Documents Attached INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ra riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office ofthe County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from m contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC V Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and thc Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si rnature and initials are re uired. ln most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadtines! The document was approved by the BCC on (enter date) and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable. 1. 2, 3. 4. 5, 6. N/A(Not A licable) N/A I: Forms/ County Forms/ BCC Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 9D RESOLUTION NO. 2008-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO REAPPOINT MEMBERS TO THE RADIO ROAD BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 97-52 created and established the Radio Road Beautification Advisory Committee and provides that the Committee shall be composed of five (5) members; and WHEREAS, the terms of two (2) members will expire on March 3, 2008, creating vacancies on this Committee; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners previously provided public notice soliciting applications from interested parties; and WHEREAS, the Committee has provided the Board of County Commissioners with its recommendations for appointment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. Dale L. Lewis is hereby reappointed to the Radio Road Beautification Advisory Committee for a 4 year term, said term to commence March 3, 2008, and to expire on March 3, 2012. 2. Betty R. Schudel is hereby appointed to the Radio Road Beautification Advisory for a 4 year term, said term to commence March 3, 2008, and to expire on March 3, 2012. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby waives the provisions of Section Seven B. of Ordinance No. 2001-55, as amended, relating to a limitation of two consecutive terms of office, for the purpose of reappointment of Dale L. Lewis to this Committee. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATED: February 26, 2008 ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk By: l\.111 " .. =,' ~fl.C Attis\ u to ,Clerk 119Ntw't ..l~' . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS :,7k_ TOM HENNING, Chairman Item# qD Agenda -::b--~ ",-Or Date U- V I.V Jeffre Chief ~:~~d d---=~::~ ! ~ Del):Jty C:e;k lJ -U ~ -..0"'_---..--.....,."'"'..,'.,_. CP:08-BCC-00409 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 9 E TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Oftice only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exception of the Chaimlan's signature, draw a line throue:h routine: lines #1 throue:h #4, comolete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routine: order) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder ofthc original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to he delivered to the BCe office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item.) Name of Primary Staff Kay Nell, CLA Phone Number Extension 8400 Contact Collier County Attomey's Office Agenda Date Item was February 26, 2008 Agenda Item Number 9E Approved by the BCC Type of Document Resolution 2008-49 Number of Original 1 Attached Documents Attached 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney, This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State OffiCials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chainman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as thc date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiateu contract date whichever is a licable, "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCe's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines! The document was approved by the Bee on (enter date) and all cbanges made during tbe meeting bave been incorporated in tbe attacbed document. Tbe Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Iicable. Yes (Initial) N/A (Not A licabte) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. @ N/A (([; I: Forms/ County Forms/ BCC Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 9E RESOLUTION NO. 2008-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO REAPPOINT MEMBERS TO THE BAYSHORE AVALON BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 97-82, as amended, establishing the Bayshore Avalon Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit and creating the Bayshore Avalon Beautification Advisory Committee, provides that the Committee shall consist of five (5) members; and WHEREAS, the terms of two (2) members will expire on March 3, 2008, creating vacancies on this Committee; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners previously provided public notice soliciting applications from interested parties; and WHEREAS, the Bayshore Avalon Beautification Advisory Committee has provided the Board of County Commissioners with its recommendations for appointment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF CDUNlY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNlY, FLORIDA, that: 1. Bill L. Neal, resident, is hereby reappointed to the Bayshore Avalon Beautification Advisory Committee for a four-year term, said term to commence March 3, 2008, and expire on March 3, 2012. 2. Maurice Gutierrez, resident, is hereby reappointed to the Bayshore Avalon Beautification Advisory Committee for a four-year term, said term to commence March 3, 2008, and expire on March 3, 2012. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby waives the provisions of Section Seven B. of Ordinance No. 2001-55, as amended, relating to a limitation of two consecutive terms of office, for the purpose of reappointment of Bill L. Neal and Maurice Gutierrez to this Committee. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATED: February 26, 2008 ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNlY COMMISSIONERS ::Ik TOM HENNING, Chairman ~~~~~o.~. I1CJMUrt ..1" Appr ved as to form and legalu I 'e c . Item # q f" Agenda't,zu, -0 ~ . Date ~~~d 2,:Zq -0 f I ~lu A /~Ofr- Deputy Clerk _, \0 A JALKiN9 Points &"C-iZ, z/21t,lo'i?- CJ<- History I, Since 1982 there has been a separate table in the LDC in a separate section titled "Supplementary District Regulations" that has specified setbacks for all types of accessory structures for residential land uses, 2, There are also the district standards in the Estates Zoning District that in 1982 set forth "minimum yard requirements" but did not qualify as to whether or not the setback requirements were to apply to principal structures, accessory structures or both, 3, My theory is that this discrepancy prompted an administrative interpretation to apply a 10 foot rear yard setback per the setback table in the supplementary district regulations, per discussions with staff present at that time, 4, This interpretation became more problematic in 1991 when the LDC was adopted after the adopting of the GMP and text was added to the Zoning District Regulations in the Estates Zoning District which clarified that the setback standards stated in the Zoning district (vs the table) applied to accessory structures, This theoretically "reversed" the historical 10 foot standard, 5, The interpretation of 10 feet carried on throughout all the LDC changes and was an accepted practice to be applied by staff for over 20 years and accepted by the public until one inquiry was made approximately 2 months ago by a citizen, 6, No evidence of written policy; not too unusual give the length oftime of the 10 foot setback application, Staff available in the audience to give verbal testimony to the 10 foot rule application, Points to Consider: I, 10 foot rear yard setback has been routinely applied for over 20 years with know known concerns until now (one concern), 2, A change now to require additional setback beyond 10 feet will create legal non- conforming structures which is undesirable but can be remedied over time, 3, This discrepancy has been in place throughout the tenure of over two decades of County Manager's, CDES Administrators, Planning Directors and Building Officials, I regret to have to be the one to bring this forward to you after all this time however it is a problem that needs to be resolved so staff can apply Board desired setback for accessory structures, Options: 1, Keep the 10 foot rear yard setback requirement for accessory structures associated with residential dwellings - problem goes away; question about consistency with GGAMP (75 feet is not expressly stated in the GMP), 2, Require the 75 foot for accessory structures per the LDC/Estates zoning district standards - creates non-conforming structures, 3, Adopt a different standard for different periods oftime with a build back policy subject to landscape buffering, Creates different regulations in the zoning district which are subject to errors in application and confusion, Numerical data in the report was not clearly stated that it was for a one square mile sample in the Estates zoning district Staff is prepared at this time to present additional data regarding the number of impacted properties, but please keep in mind that lOnon-conforming structures are not any less problematic then 210 non- conforming structures, Please direct staff as to how you would like us to remedy the setback situation for accessory structures, An LDC amendment will more than likely be required so until that time it will be necessary to get the Board's guidance on what standard to apply, ~cc ---yZ a1~oK~ JaN S" ICl8L /J( ( "'1<- ? /2~1C'/?-<:J\ 7.10 E - Estates District: a. District Purpose: The provisions of this district are intended to apply to an area of low density residences in a semi-rural to rural environment, permitting all necessary residential activities and limited agricultural activities. The district is designed to accommodate certain structures and uses subject to restrictions and requirements necessary to preserve and protect the low density residential, semi-rural and rural environment character of the district. It is the intent of this district to implement the comprehensive Plan within, but not necessarily limited to those areas of Collier County shown as Low Density on the Land Use Plan. b. Uses and Structures: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or part, for other than the following: 1) Permitted principal Uses and Structures: single-family dwellings. 2) Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: (a) Accessory uses and structures which are incidental to and customarily associated with the uses permitted in the district. (b) Field crops raised for consumption of the people residing on the land. (c) Keeping of fowl or poultry not to exceed twenty- fi ve (25) in total number pro- vided such fowl or poul try are kept in an enclosure located thrity (30) feet or more from any lot line and at least one hundred (100) feet from any existing residence located in adjacent porperty. (d) Keeping of horses and/or Ii vestock (excluding pigs and hogs) not to exceed two (2) per acre. Any roofed structure fOE the shelter and feeding of such animals shall be no less than twenty (20) feet from any lot line or no closer than one hundred (100) feet to any existing residence located on adj acent property. No open feed lot for animals shall be permitted. . 30. elf-*. iflavlDK' ~R (e) One guest house 8.38) . (Subject to section 3) Permitted Provisional Uses and Structures: ( a) Churches and other places of worship. (b) Public, private and and colleges having academic curriculum. parochial schools a conventional (c) Recreational facilities not accessory to principal use. (d) Social and fraternal organizations. (Subject to Section 8.11) (e) Owner occupied child care centers (Sub- ject to Section 8.48), convalescent homes, hospices, rest homes, homes for the aged, adult foster homes, children's homes and rehabilitation centers. 4) Prohibi ted Uses and Structures: Any use or structure not specifically, provisionally, or by reasonable implication permitted herein, or permissible by special exception. c. Development Standards: 1 ) Minimum Lot Area: acreS4 Two and one-quarter (2~) 2 ) Minimum Lot width: feet. One hundred fifty (150) 3) Minimum Yard Requirements: (a) Front Yard: Seventy-five (75) feet. (b) Side Yard: Ten (10%) percent of the width of the lot not to exceed a maximum require- ment of thirty (30) feet. (c) Rear Yard: seventy-five (75) feet. 4) Maximum Height of Structures: feet. Thirty (30) 5) Maximum Density: One (1) dwelling unit per two and one-quarter (2~) acres. . 31. SECTION 8. 6a-F2- ./ 2 jZIf/(f) - c.t. 6~~el~stYicl ~~\I=;+1~ JaY" 5; I Q82.. 8.;;l. - ~ SUPPLEMENTARY DISTRICT REGULATIONS: 8.1 Visibility at Intersections in All Zoning Districts: On a corner lot in all zoning districts, no fence, wall, hedge, planting, or structure shall be erected, planted, or allowed to grow in such a manner as to obstruct vision between a height of three (3) feet and eight (8) feet above the centerline grades of the intersecting streets in the area bounded by the street lines of such corner lots and a line joining points along said street lines forty (40) feet from the point of intersection. Parking is prohibited in this area. Trees are permitted, so long as the foliage is cut away and maintained within the three (3) and eight (8) foot clearance requirement. Posts for illuminating fix- tures, traffic control, and street name signs are permitted, so long as the sign or equipment is not within the prescribed clear space. 8.2 Location of Accessory Structures: Accessory structures must be constructed simultaneously with or following the construction of the principal structure and shall conform with the following setbacks and building separ- ations: ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Non-Waterfront Lots - NonGolf Course Lots FRONT STRUCTURE TO STRUCTURE (If detached) REAR SIDE L Parking Garage or Carport - Single Family 10' SPS 10' SPS 2. I-Story Parking Structures 10' SPS 35' SPS 3. Multi-Story Parking Structures *1/1 SPS 35' SPS 4. Swimming Pool and/or Screen Enclosure (One and two family) N SPS 10' SPS 5. Swimming Pool (Multiple family and Commercial) N SPS 20' 15' 6. Tennis Courts (Private) (One and two family) 10' SPS 15' SPS . ll3. 7. REV. 9 7. Tennis Courts (Multiple family and Commercial) 8. Utility Buildings 9. Chickee, Barbecue Areas 10. Attached Screen Porch 11. Unlisted Accessory 12. Satellite Dish Antenna N = None N/A = Not Applicable NP=Structure allowed in rear of building only. * SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS NP 20' 10' 10' 10' SPS 15' 15' SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS ~~-~ lJW)Oe {{{ 20' 10' N . ACCESSORY STRUCTURES On Waterfront Lots and Golf Course Lota 1. Parking Garage or Carport - Single Family 2. I-Story Parking Structures 3. Multi-Story Parking Structures' 4. Swimming Pool and/or Screen Enclosure (One and two family) 5. Swimming Pool (Multiple family and Commercial) 6. Tennis Courts (Private) (One and two family) Tennis Courts (Multiple family and Commercial) . N/A 10' 10'* SPS = Calculated same as principal structure. *1/1 = l/foot of accessory height = l/foot of building separation. FRONT SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS 114. STRUCTURE REAR** SIDE TO STRUCTURE (If detached) SPS SPS SPS 10' 20' 15' 35' SPS SPS SPS SPS 15 ' SPS SPS 10' 10' *1/1 N N 10' 20' REV. 9 ** In those cases where the Coastal Control Line is involved, the Coastal Control Line will apply. 114.1 . e;t-l.. 1-f2t4~~ 8.3 Exclusions from Height Limits: The height limitations con- tained in the Schedule of District Regulations do not apply to spires, belfries, cupolas, flagpoles, antennas, water tanks, fire towers when operated by a branch of government, ventila- tors, chimneys, feed storage structures, silos, windmills, or to other appurtenances usually required to be placed above the roof level and not intended for human occupancy, or to airport control towers; provided, however, the heights of these struc- tures or appurtenances thereto shall not exceed any height limitations prescribed by the Federal Aviation Agency or airport zoning regulations within the flight approach zone of airports. (See Section 9.9). 8.4 Exclusions from Height Limits - Off-Street Parking Within a Building. In instances where off-street parking is provided within the primary building, the Zoning Director may waive the maximum height requirements to the extent necessary to permit off-street parking within the primary building, provided the number of off-street parking spaces required by this ordinance for the use involved may not be reduced, nor may the waiver in height be greater than that necessary to provide for the off-street parking within the primary building, with a maximum of two (2) parking levels. This exclusion shall not apply to those districts where provisions are made in the Height Limits for under-building parking. 8.5 Exceptiona to Required Yarda. In all zone districts, yards as defined in Section 20 shall be as established by the Schedule of District Regulations except as follows: 115. 10 GiC.. MEMORANDUM Date: March 3, 2008 To: Phil Gramatges, Sr. Project Manager PUED From: Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Resolution 2008-53 Amending Resolution 2007-257 Please find one copy of the Resolution (Agenda Item #10G), as referenced above, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, February 27, 2008. If you should have any questions, please call me at 252-8406. Thank you. Enclosure ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLJ 0 G TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to oJiginal document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exceotion of the Chairman's sienature, draw a line throuo-h routine: lines #1 throue:h #4, comolete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routinl!' orderl I. Tom Henning Board of County Commissioners 2. - 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Nonnally lhe primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact infonnation is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the BCC Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the BCe office only after the BCe has acted to approve the item.) Name of Primary Staff Porfirio E. Gramatges Phone Number 252-8836 Contact - Agenda Date Item was February p6, 2008 ~o..f> I v--- Agenda Item Number lOG Aooroved bv the BCC ,).7 Type of Document Resolution Number of Originat t Attached Documents Attached 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes cotumn or mark "N/ A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a fO nate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other parties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's signature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception),_,~riginal document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 2/26/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a lieable. Yes (Initial) N/A (Not A licable) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. r N/A N/A -- I: Forms/ County Forms/ BCe forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 lOG RESOLUTION NO. 08- 53 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE TO ADD A FEE FOR HYDRAULIC MODELING AND ANALYSIS NECESSARY TO ENSURE CONCURRENCY FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on December 11, 2007, the Board of County Commissioners ("Board") approved Resolution No. 2007-357, establishing a fee schedule for services performed or collected by Collier County's Community Development and Environmental Services Division identified as Attachment B to Resolution No. 2007-357; and WHEREAS, the Board recognizes that an addition to the fee schedule is necessary to reflect the actual cost incurred by the County for hydraulic modeling and analysis necessary to ensure concurrency for water and wastewater services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1) The Board declares that the additional fee is fair and reasonable to those who will receive the benefit of services, reviews, and inspections, required pursuant to the Land Development Code and the County's corresponding development review and permitting processes. 2) The fee schedule indentified as Attachment B to Resolution No. 2007-357 is amended to add Paragraph F. 7. d. as follows: F) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN * * * * * * * * * * * * * 7) Utility Plan Review & Inspection Fees- * * * * * * * * * * * * d. Utility Modeling and Analvsis fee (for all DRI's and PUD's) $ 1000 at time ofSDP, SIP. and PPL application for all developments within the geographic boundaries of the Collier County Water-Sewer District. * * * * * * * * * * * * * BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board with an immediate effective date upon the Board of County Commissioner's approval, and that Resolution No. 2007-357 is amended as stated above. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote, this 27th day of February, 2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK .' U'.,". BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA I 9lllturt Approyal as to form and legal Sufficiency: Item# lOG ~;~;da a.- o.l-o~ Jenmfer A. Belpe io Assistant County Attorney Det~ 01- oa-o Q Recd a 1 taYTtf-1 OA- Sl,{tf(\;fk'd Cttr+~-b loft ~ t.R i.ifiill"~~.iifili'ii"; I i - ! . -I ..".... - t ~ ilftIJriIIIIJfJ;!II,iil ~ 1 i 1 ~mn! r ~ II IIi1 iilj hi111hJ llj Iii . I I I umUI .1 r I I, II I I ~ I i 111 Ii] II iilJflunmi I i I HlHlfl i:1 If.1 I ,. ~. ;illl . I n fHfHll 1:111 litl ~i II l..}t ! I I I ltililri!i Ii i fil!~ . I mm . 11 Ill;!; >'{ ~. HI . I II', · I I i Iii Wlj! II i i In q 0 ,................. .. ... Q.... ..,Qot I J1J1J1J1I1I1':' ..........." 1iI..........,~ HHOr ! I Uh I · I' I' H~~H. II to II i'. IIIIUI 'If[l t .. II ')1 i If.. i .. ~ I 'I Ii Ij " I I ; I >, I ..................z I ill fIll! fJ ~ ~ it II · In ! I !. .' I ' I' mrml !I' i · i ,. " . , j · II. ~ r, : , mlm , " hi 1 c ~ 1 I ! , mml .. ~ <i II I :li;l ~ i. ! , , HUH, hill I P f t 11I11I, ~H II j i mm 'r . , J "11 ' :;fi lQ]J :~, ~ j@ . 9 W @ ~ =" . @ 21 ~ I' ~ n.. iiHhll!~1I H~ih ' ! .~'-~---'.-'--l \<yA..C,Q. , u CD U U I ' ~CD ~U ~~ ::0 ~O ~' n CD ~ c I CD ~ fi W =" ,~ . 1\QJ i ~ 9 @ @8 ~;!J11 all ~ IjJ"'I~ m;;i <fi \ 011./. ffi u CD U U I ... ~CD ~'U ~~ ::0 ~O ~' n CD ~ c I CD ~ 'i f i ; , j ~ I' ~ ijI I,'ihh III II WUi ", ! u CD U U I ' ()CD g,u ai' c; ~~ ::0 ~O ~' n CD ~ c I CD ~ fi (0) ~ 16 @ ~ ,~~ r=:==IO ,. @ @8 1 @ F::> "@WJ ~ @8 . I.,: all i If I @2)'.H=hln. P!Ui ,h ! \oA/L~ u CD U U I ' ~CD ;U ~~ ::0 ~O ~' t? ~ C I CD ~ l2B ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. OrigitHlI documents should be hand de1ivcTI:d 10 the RO<lrd Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only aftl'f the l30ard has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriutc for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed, frthe document is already complete with the exec lion of the Chairman's si nature, draw a line l:hrou h routin lines # I thrau h #4, com Jete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routin order) 1. 2. 3. 4. PRIMARY CONT ACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item) 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners Name of Primary Staff Scott R. Teach Phone Number X8400 Contact Agenda Date ttem was 2/26/08 Agenda Item Number ,~ /;;2.6 Annroved bv the BCC Type of Document Retention Agreement Number of Original I Attached Documents Attached 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office Yes (Initial) N/A (Not A licable) 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on d .Cllo-()S (enter date) and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable. \)DA NIR 'DDf\ DDA D00 uDf1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. I: Forms! County Forms! Bee Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 MEMORANDUM Date: March 7, 2008 To: Scott Teach Assistant County Attorney From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Retention Agreement with Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A. Attached please find one (1) copy, referenced above (Agenda Item 12B), adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 27, 2008. The original agreement will be held in the Minutes & Records Department as part of the Board's permanent record. If you should have any questions, please contact me 252-8411. Thank you. 128 ":.'1 , i--.:' ';"" J-.. ! f _~.. ; I \~L. U( i ;:-'(~:- : ,\ il)NTY ATTORNEr RETENTION AGREEMENT WITII{aD3 MAR - 5 ALLEN. NORTON & BLUE. P.A. 1''' I, 4 (1 II ,. lw This Retention Agreement is made by and between the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (the "County"), and the law firm of Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A., of Tampa, Florida ("Allen, Norton"). Whereas, Allen, Norton has special expertise and resources in a wide range oflegal matters, with particular expertise in labor and employment related matters; and Whereas, the County from time to time has a requirement and need for legal services which are particularly within the expertise of Allen, Norton; Now, Therefore, in consideration of the premises contained herein, the County hereby hires and retains Allen, Norton and Allen, Norton hereby agrees to provide legal services to County. ARTICLE 1 COMPENSATION; METHOD OF PAYMENT 1.1 Compensation shall be paid to Allen, Norton in accordance with the terms set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Requirements for reimbursable expenses are set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Expenses other than automobile expenses must be documented by copies of paid receipts or other evidence of payment. The Certificate contained in Exhibit C must be included with every invoice submitted for payment. 1.2 The rates set forth in Exhibit A shall remain in effect without change for a minimum of two (2 years) from the effective date of this Agreement. In the third, fourth and fifth years of the Agreement, upon the request of Allen, Norton, the County Attorney is Page 1 of 17 128 128 authorized to negotiate to increase the hourly rate up to a maximum often (10) percent without approval by the Board of County Commissioners. In the negotiation process, Allen, Norton must substantiate the reason the request is being made (i.e. market conditions, increase in CPI, etc.) 1.3 Multiple Attorney Assignments. The County acknowledges that, from time to time, it may be advisable for Allen, Norton to assign more than one attorney to a project or case. Nevertheless, in order to ensure that such multiple attorney assignments are efficient and cost-effective for the County, Allen, Norton agrees to the following procedures and billing limitations for multiple attorney assignments. 1.3.1 A primary attorney will be identified for such projects or cases and that attorney will be the sole contact attorney for the County, except in the case of an emergency or the County's written pre-approval. In practice, this means that generally only the primary attorney will meet or communicate directly with County personnel or attend meetings, court, arbitrations, mediations or other proceedings on behalf of the County. 1.3.2 Attorneys assigned to a project or case other than the primary attorney will be less senior attorneys with lower billing rates unless the additional attorney(s) has/have a demonstrated expertise that will demonstrably enhance the value and efficiency of the legal services being provided to the County. 1.3.3 Allen, Norton agrees that internal or in-house conferences among multiple attorneys assigned to a project or case shall be kept to the absolute minimum necessary for the provision of the legal services in question. To the extent Page 2 of 17 128 internal or in-house conferences among multiple attorneys assigned to a project or case are necessary, each such attorney may bill at his or her customary rate for up to thirty (30) minutes for any such conference. To the extent such a conference exceeds thirty (30) minutes in length, Allen, Norton agrees that it will discount the total billings for all attorneys involved in the conference by forty-five (45) percent. 1.4 Allen, Norton may submit invoices for hourly work assignments pursuant to Exhibit A only after the services for which the invoices are submitted have been completed or expenses incurred. An original invoice plus one copy is due within fifteen (15) days of the end of the month, except the final invoice which must be received no later than sixty (60) days after the work is completed or the expiration oftms Agreement. 1.5 To be deemed proper, all invoices must comply with the requirements set forth in this Agreement and must be submitted on the form and pursuant to the instruction prescribed by County. Payment may be withheld for failure of Allen, Norton to comply with a term, condition, or requirement of this Agreement. 1.6 Payment shall be made to Allen, Norton at: Allen, Norton, & Blue, P.A. 324 South Hyde Park Avenue Suite 350 Tampa, Florida 33606 ARTICLE 2 INSURANCE 2.1 In order to insure the indemnification obligation contained above, Allen, Norton shall as a minimum, provide, pay for, and maintain in force at all times during the term of this Page 3 of 17 128 Agreement, professional liability insurance in an amount not less than Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000.00) Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limits. If any liability insurance obtained by Allen, Norton to comply with the insurance requirements contained herein is issued on a "claims made" form as opposed to an "occurrence" form, the retroactive date for coverage shall be no later than the commencement date of the assigned work to which this Agreement applies, and such insurance shall provide, in the event of cancellation or non-renewal, that the discovery period for insurance claims (tail coverage) shall not be less than three years following the completion of the assigned work and acceptance by the County. 2.2 Such policy or policies shall be issued by United States Treasury approved companies authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and having agents upon whom service of process may be made in Collier County, Florida. 2.3 Allen, Norton shall furnish to the Risk Management Director Certificates ofInsurance or endorsements evidencing the insurance coverages specified by this Article prior to beginning performance of work under this Agreement. ARTICLE 3 TERM AND TIME OF PERFORMANCE 3.1 The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of three years to begin February 26, 2008 and to end on February 26, 2011, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. Absent notice of intent to terminate, the Agreement may be renewed upon mutual consent of the parties for two (2) additional terms of one (1) year each. (In the event the term of this Agreement extends beyond a single fiscal year Page 4 of 17 128 of County, the continuation of this Agreement beyond the end of any fiscal year shall be subject to the availability of funds from County in accordance with Chapter 129, Florida Statutes. ) 3.2 Time shall be deemed to be ofthe essence in performing the duties, obligations and responsibilities by this Agreement. 3.3 Any amendments, alterations, variations, modifications or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing, duly signed by both parties hereto, and attached to the original of this Agreement. ARTICLE 4 TERMINATION 4.1 This Agreement may be terminated by either party for cause upon ten (10) days' notice or by the County for convenience upon no less than thirty (30) days' advance written notice in accordance with the "NOTICES" section of this Agreement. 4.2 Termination of this Agreement for cause shall include, but not be limited to, failure to suitably perform the work, failure to continuously perform the work in a manner calculated to meet or accomplish the objectives of County as set forth in this Agreement, or multiple breach of the provisions ofthis Agreement notwithstanding whether any such breach was previously waived or cured. 4.3 In the event this Agreement is terminated for convenience, Allen, Norton shall be paid for any services performed to the date the Agreement is terminated; however, upon being notified of County's election to terminate, Allen, Norton shall refrain from performing further services or incurring additional expenses under the term of this Agreement. Allen, Norton acknowledges and agrees that Ten Dollars ($10) of the compensation to be Page 5 of 17 128 paid by County, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged by Allen, Norton, is given as specific consideration to Allen, Norton for County's right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. Allen, Norton's obligations to the County as provided for hereunder shall cease upon termination, except for participating in an orderly and professional transfer of such responsibilities and files or copies of files to the County or its designee. ARTICLE 5 RECORD AUDIT AND INSPECTION 5.1 County shall have the right to audit the books and records of Allen, Norton pertinent to the funding under this Agreement. Allen, Norton shall preserve and make available, at reasonable times for examination and audit by County, all financial records, supporting documents, and other documents pertinent to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years after termination of this Agreement or, if any audit has been initiated and audit findings have not been resolved at the end of the three years, the books and records shall be retained until resolution ofthe audit findings. 5.2 If the Florida Public Records Act (Chapter 119, Fla. Stat.) is determined by County to be applicable to Allen, Norton's records, Allen, Norton shall comply with all requirements thereof, however, no confidentiality or non-disclosure requirement of either federal or state law shall be violated by Allen, Norton. ARTICLE 6 CONFLICT OF INTEREST 6.1 Allen, Norton states that it is familiar with and will comply with the terms and conditions of Chapter 112, Part III, Florida Statutes (Code of Ethics). Page 6 of 17 128 6.2 It is important that Allen, Norton be independent and impartial in order to properly conduct its services to the County. Allen, Norton shall not act as counsel in any lawsuit or other adversary proceeding in which County is named as an adversary party or in which Allen, Norton takes an adverse position to the County. 6.3 Neither Allen, Norton nor its employees shall have or hold any continuing or frequently recurring employment or contractual relationship that is substantially antagonistic or incompatible with Allen, Norton's loyal and conscientious exercise of judgment related to its performance under this Agreement. 6.4 In the event Allen, Norton is permitted to utilize subcontractors, herein, to perform any services required by this Agreement, Allen, Norton agrees to prohibit such subcontractors, by written contract, from having any conflicts as within the meaning of this section. 6.5 If at any time Allen, Norton's firm represents a client in matters having to do with the Collier County government, be it before the Board of County Commissioners or any other agency or division of Collier County government, Allen, Norton will contact the County Attorney's Office before undertaking such representation so that it can be determined whether a conflict of interest exists. ARTICLE 7 INDEMNIFICATION 7.1 Allen, Norton acknowledges and agrees that Ten Dollars ($10.00) of the compensation to be paid by County, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged by Allen, Norton, is given as specific consideration to Allen, Norton so that Allen, Norton shall at all times hereafter indemnify, hold harmless and, at County's option, defend or pay for an attorney Page 7 of 17 128 selected by County to defend County, its officers, agents, servants, and employees against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, and expenditures of any kind, including attorney fees, court costs, and expenses, caused by negligent act or omission of Allen, Norton, its employees, agents, servants, or officers, or accruing, resulting from, or related to the subject matter of this Agreement including, without limitation, any and all claims, demands or causes of action of any nature whatsoever resulting from injuries or damages sustained by any person or property. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. To the extent considered necessary by County, any sums due Allen, Norton under this Agreement may be retained by County until all of County's claims for indemnification pursuant to this Agreement have been settled or otherwise resolved; and any amount withheld shall not be subject to payment of interest by County. ARTICLE 8 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 8.1 Any and all reports, photographs, surveys, and other data and documents provided or created in connection with this Agreement are and shall remain the property of County. In the event oftermination ofthis Agreement, any reports, photographs, surveys, and other data and documents prepared by Allen, Norton, whether finished or unfinished, shall become the property of County and shall be delivered by Allen, Norton to the County within seven (7) days oftermination ofthis Agreement by either party. Any compensation due to Allen, Norton shall be withheld until all documents are received as provided herein. Page 8 of 17 128 ARTICLE 9 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR 9.1 Allen, Norton is an independent contractor under this Agreement. Services provided by Allen, Norton shall be subject to the supervision of Allen, Norton, and such services shall not be provided by Allen, Norton as officers, employees, or agents of the County. The parties expressly acknowledge that it is not their intent to create any rights or obligations in any third person or entity under this Agreement. ARTICLE 10 NONDISCRIMINATION, EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 10.1 Allen, Norton shall not unlawfully discriminate against any person in its operations and activities in its use or expenditure ofthe funds or any portion of the funds provided by this Agreement and shall affirmatively comply with all applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in the course of providing any services funded in whole or in part by County, including Titles I and II of the ADA (regarding nondiscrimination on the basis of disability), and all applicable regulations, guidelines, and standards. 10.2 Allen, Norton's decisions regarding the delivery of services under this Agreement shall be made without regard to or consideration of race, age, religion, color, gender, sexual orientation national origin, martial status, physical or mental disability, political affiliation, or any other factor which cannot be lawfully or appropriately used as a basis for service delivery. Page 9 of 17 128 10.3 Allen, Norton shall comply with Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act regarding nondiscrimination on the basis of disability in employment and further shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, age, religion, color, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, marital status, political affiliation, or physical or mental disability. In addition, Allen, Norton shall take affirmative steps to ensure nondiscrimination in employment against disabled persons. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff, termination, rates of pay, other forms of compensation, terms and conditions of employment, training (including apprenticeship), and accessibility. 10.4 Allen, Norton shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated without regard to race, age, religion, color, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, marital status, political affiliation, or physical or mental disability during employment. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff, termination, rates of pay, other forms of compensation, terms and conditions of employment, training (including apprenticeship), and accessibility. 10.5 Allen, Norton shall not engage in or commit any discriminatory practice in performing the Scope of Services or any part of Scope of Services of this Agreement. ARTICLE 11 NOTICES 11.1 Whenever either party desires to give notice to the other, such notice must be in writing, sent by registered or certified United States Mail, postage prepaid, return receipt Page 10 of 17 128 requested, or by hand-delivery, addressed to the party for whom it is intended at the place last specified. The place for giving notice shall remain the same as set forth herein until changed in writing in the manner provided in this section. For the present, the parties designate the following: FOR COLLIER COUNTY: County Attorney Government Center 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 FOR ALLEN, NORTON: Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A. 324 South Hyde Park Avenue Suite 350 Tampa, Florida 33606 ARTICLE 12 MISCELLANEOUS 8.1 WAIVER OF BREACH AND MATERIALITY Failure by County to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of the provision or modification of this Agreement. A waiver of any breach of a provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms ofthis Agreement. 8.1 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS Allen, Norton shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws, codes, ordinances, rules, and regulations in performing its duties, responsibilities, and obligations related to this Agreement. Page 11 of 17 128 12.3 SEVERANCE In the event a portion of this Agreement is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the remaining provisions shall continue to be effective unless County and Allen, Norton elect to terminate this Agreement. The election to terminate this Agreement based upon this provision shall be made within seven (7) days after the finding by the court becomes final. 12.4 APPLICABLE LAW AND VENUE This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for litigation concerning this Agreement shall be in Collier County, Florida. 12.5 PRIOR AGREEMENTS This document supercedes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, and understandings applicable to the matters contained herein and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements or understandings concerning the subject matter ofthis Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements, whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless contained in a written document in accordance with Article 3 above. 12.6 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE The truth and accuracy of each "Whereas" clause set forth above is acknowledged by the parties. The attached Exhibits A, B, and C are incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement. Page 120f17 ""-., D~E!!":~~~o'8 ~~__,:'(\ --,' J>, _ :..':'..~~"-,. "T""l>S"'; -, '. "'. ; ;-:M.' ~~".',l'. ',~ '. l;"': ::owiG' E.IlROCk, CLERK 1- "',.-', ""-, '"I . ""'C . "',' '; I.' -$')'" ;' \M': L.. '\.., 3''''1 oc, , ~,~ to o.~.... . 'IWI'lllt.... _h. Approved as to form and Ie suffi enc BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ~iu . By' ~ . TO lNG, HAIRM~ S tt R. each Managing Assistant County Attorney ALLEN, NORTON, & BLUE, PA DATE: Bi~/~/~~ STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Retention Agreement was acknowledged before me this;l.'/3"<<day of r::E-Bf!-u-f\l2.y ,2008, by MALI< LFV,rr- as <v.JAkl-fOI-{)=/l. of Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A., a Florida Professional Association, on behalf of the professional association.@he is Grso?ally kn~o me or produced as identification. ~~~".^~ Signature of ot Pubhc ~1Yl0FP~ (YJAY.:'Or-J Name of Notary Pu ic typed, printed or My Commission Expires: Q) KIMBERLY MAXSON "'i CommIssion DO 698670 , ExpIres September 2, 2011 n BondlldThluT~F.......1OOo8I5-70111 Page 13 ofl7 J2p 128 EXHIBIT A For professional services rendered, Allen, Norton's fee shall be based on the hourly rate as follows: $220.00 per hour for services provided by principals and associates $ 95.00 per hour for services provided by law clerks & paralegals. Allen, Norton's fee shall not exceed $100,000.00 per Purchase Order without the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. (Where appropriate a "not to exceed" sum shall be agreed to when each assignment is made to Allen, Norton.) In the event that Allen, Norton is required or requested to perform any additional or extraordinary services not herein contemplated, Allen, Norton shall be entitled to apply for additional compensation, the amount of which shall be subject to the approval of County and no such additional compensation in excess of the amount herein stated shall be paid unless specifically authorized in advance in writing by County in its sole discretion. Allen, Norton shall provide, at no cost to County, the annual response to County's auditors regarding pending or threatened litigation. The auditors typically request information regarding all litigation, claims and assessments considered to be material. The response should include the nature of the litigation, the progress of the case to date, an estimate of the amount or range of potential loss, and any other information considered necessary to explain the case. Allen, Norton shall provide said response within 30 days of receipt of the request. NOTES: . Divisions, or departments within such divisions, shall be responsible and pay for legal counsel services relating to litigation and outside counsel specifically for cases, matters or issues relating to such division or department, as determined by the County Attorney in coordination with the County Manager. Page 14 of 17 128 EXHIBIT B 1. In addition to the charges for professional fees set forth in Exhibit A, and the Schedules attached hereto, County shall reimburse Allen, Norton for out-of-pocket expenses reasonably incurred in the course of rendering such legal services, including costs of long distance calls, printing, costs of reproduction, and necessary travel expenses (with lodging expenses no greater than $150.00 per night) incurred in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 112, F.S. Allen, Norton shall not charge for travel of attorneys between its offices so that it can provide the best available and most appropriate lawyer in any of its office locations for the issues involved. 2. Allen, Norton shall submit invoices on a monthly basis for the payment of out-of- pocket expenses. Each invoice shall include a signed certificate listing all costs, expenses, vouchers, invoices and other documentary evidence that will describe in reasonable detail the basis for expenditures for which reimbursement is sought as set forth below. 3. REOUIREMENTS The following represents Collier County's payment requirements for legal costs }- Your federal employee identification number must be on all invoices submitted. }- The applicable Purchase Order number must be on all invoices submitted. }- No service, interest, or other charge oflike nature is to be imposed with regard to any item, invoice, or request. All firms doing business with Collier County must have a current W-9 "Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification" on file. }- Services rendered must be specifically and concisely identified, as well as the bond issue or financing transaction for which the services were rendered. }- Names of persons performing services, hourly rates, and dates must be listed. The County agrees to reimburse Allen, Norton for retention and utilization of sub-consultants. Page 15 of 17 12n >- Reimbursable expense must be verified by attached receipts or copies thereof. >- Claims for mileage and meals cannot exceed statutory allowance as provided for under Chapter 112, F.S. Meals and mileage cannot be charged unless the professional has traveled outside the county of the principal business location. >- Claims for lodging at single rate (actual cost) must be substantiated by paid bill or charge, with a cap of no more than $150.00 per night. >- Car rentals required for travel should include compact or standard-size vehicles only. >- Common carrier travel shall be reimbursable at tourist or coach class fares only. >- Accounting Division requires original receipts, or copies ofreceipts which have been individually certified to be true copies of the originals. In addition the Certificate contained in Exhibit C must accompany each invoice. The certifying person must sign the Certification form and a description provided of the items, which are certified. >- Faxes shall not be reimbursed >- Legal Research costs (Lexis-Nexis, Westlaw, etc.) shall not be reimbursed. Page 16 of 17 128 EXHIBIT C CERTIFICATE IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that: 1. has been duly designated as special counsel to render legal services or provider of services for or on behalf of Collier County; 2. Each of the documents hereinafter identified and attached is a true and correct copy of the original record; 3. Expenditure(s) enumerated represent costs necessarily incurred during the course of official business for which payment has not been received and for which documentation is not available or reasonably retrievable; 4. Claims are in compliance with the applicable statutes and administrative orders, and with the express provision that all other parties are barred from entitlement to any part of these costs. RE: Invoice No. , Dated Period Covered: , Amount IN-HOUSE CHARGES: Photocopies: copIes $ Mileage: miles $ OTHER (Copies of invoices required): Long Distance Calls $ Other: $ TOTAL: $ FOR THE FIRM Signed: Print Name: Title: Date: 04-COA-OI1581792 rev I Page 17 of 17 'J/ " J ~, i1 (~ k'-' ~/ MEMORANDUM Date: February 21, 2008 To: Brenda Brilhart, Purchasing Agent Purchasing Department From: Ann Jennejohn, Sr. Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Contract #08-4197: "Nuisance Abatement Services" Contractor: Ecosystems Technology Attached please find the original contract document, as referenced above, (Agenda Item #16A6) approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. The Minutes & Records Department has also retained an original copy which will be kept as part of the Board's permanent record. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-7240. Thank you. Attachments ITEM NO.: 0t'. VUrDO~l8' .::'.{~,L ;~:t." \ >:":.t~, I '...:::'1- t'i'-Ti""\C~,l~.\, ,," '11.1 \" ," \ I' " 11", \ ~' "~, I : \ '...-" DATE RECEiVED: 16A 6~ "."'J'.~ >" " ',: \. ( \ ':' ;',r!; -~ FILE NO.: ROUTED TO: DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS LINE REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES Date: March 14,2008 To: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney From: Brenda Brilhart Purchasing Agent 239-252-8446 Re: Contract #08-4197 Nuisance Abatement Services Contractor: Ecosystems Technology BACKGROUND OF REQUEST: This contract was approved by the BCC on February 26, 2008; Agenda Item 16.A.6 This item has not been previously submitted. ACTION REQUESTED: Contract review and approval. OTHER COMMENTS: Please forward to BCC for signature after approval. Ifthere are any questions concerning the docwnent, please contact me. Purchasing would appreciate notification when the documents exit your office. Thank you. 3/!1If)r-tR~p- cJujeJJrr;@ C/~~ o z,"f -;... MEMORANDUM TO: Jeff Walker Risk Management Department FROM: Brenda Brilhart Purchasing Department DATE: March 14,2008 RE: Review of Insurance for Contract No. 08-4197 Nuisance Abatement Services Contractor: Ecosystems Technology, Inc. 16A 6~ This Contract was approved by the BCC on February 26, 2008; Agenda Item16.A.6. Please review Insurance Certificate in this Agreement for the above-referenced contract. If everything is acceptable, please forward to the County Attorney for further review and approval. Also will you advise me when it has been forwarded. Thank you. If you have any questions, please contact me at extension 8446. ~eL 7f;;11/"- 16A 6~ A G R E E MEN T 08-4197 for Nuisance Abatement Services THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this 26th day of February, 2008, by and between Ecosystem Technologies, Inc., authorized to do business in the State of Florida, whose business address is 2223 McGregor Boulevard, Fort Myers, Florida 33901, hereinafter called the "Contractor" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Collier County, Naples, hereinafter called the "County": WIT N E SSE T H: 1. COMMENCEMENT. The contract shall be for a one (1) year period, commencing on February 26, 2008 and terminating on February 25, 2009. The County may, at its discretion and with the consent of the Contractor, renew the Agreement under all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement for three (3) additional one (1) year periods. The County shall give the Contractor written notice of the County's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior to the end of the Agreement term then in effect. 2. STATEMENT OF WORK. The Contractor shall provide lawn services, as Primary awardee, and invasive plant removal and additional services, as Secondary awardee, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Bid #08-4197 and the Contractor's proposal referred to herein and made an integral part of this agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties and any modifications to this Agreement shall be mutually agreed upon in writing by the Contractor and the County Project Manager or his designee, in compliance with the County Purchasing Policy and Administrative Procedures in effect at the time such services are authorized. 3. COMPENSATION. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Agreement the aggregate of the units actually ordered and furnished at the unit price. Any county agency may purchase products and services under this contract, provided sufficient funds are included in their budget(s). Payment will be made upon receipt of a proper invoice and upon approval by the Project Manager or his designee, and in compliance with Section 218.70, Fla. Stats., otherwise known as the "Florida Prompt Payment Act". Page 1 of6 16A 6~ 4. NOTICES. All notices from the County to the Contractor shall be deemed duly served if mailed or faxed to the Contractor at the following Address: Ecosystem Technologies, Inc. 2223 McGregor Boulevard Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Attention: Jim Walsh, Vice President Telephone: 239-337-5310 Facsimile: 239-337-4494 All Notices from the Contractor to the County shall be deemed duly served if mailed or faxed to the County to: Collier County Government Center Purchasing Department - Purchasing Building 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, Florida 34112 Attention: Steve Carnell, PurchasingjGS Director Telephone: 239-252-8371 Facsimile: 239-252-6584 The Contractor and the County may change the above mailing address at any time upon giving the other party written notification. All notices under this Agreement must be in writing. 5. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating a partnership between the County and the Contractor or to constitute the Contractor as an agent of the County. 6. PERMITS: LICENSES: TAXES. In compliance with Section 218.80, F.S., all permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be obtained by the Contractor. Payment for all such permits issued by the County shall be processed internally by the County. All non-County permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be procured and paid for by the Contractor. The Contractor shall also be solely responsible for payment of any and all taxes levied on the Contractor. In addition, the Contractor shall comply with all rules, regulations and laws of Collier County, the State of Florida, or the U. S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. The Contractor agrees to comply with all laws governing the responsibility of an employer with respect to persons employed by the Contractor. 7. NO IMPROPER USE. The Contractor will not use, nor suffer or permit any person to use in any manner whatsoever, county facilities for any improper, immoral or offensive purpose, or for any purpose in violation of any federal, state, county or municipal ordinance, rule, order or regulation, or of any governmental rule or regulation now in Page 2 of6 16A 6~ effect or hereafter enacted or adopted. In the event of such violation by the Contractor or if the County or its authorized representative shall deem any conduct on the part of the Contractor to be objectionable or improper, the County shall have the right to suspend the contract of the Contractor. Should the Contractor fail to correct any such violation, conduct, or practice to the satisfaction of the County within twenty-four (24) hours after receiving notice of such violation, conduct, or practice, such suspension to continue until the violation is cured. The Contractor further agrees not to commence operation during the suspension period until the violation has been corrected to the satisfaction of the County. 8. TERMINATION. Should the Contractor be found to have failed to perform his services in a manner satisfactory to the County as per this Agreement, the County may terminate said agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a thirty (30) day written notice. The County shall be sole judge of non-performance. 9. NO DISCRIMINATION. The Contractor agrees that there shall be no discrimination as to race, sex, color, creed or national origin. 10. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall provide insurance as follows: A. Commercial General Liabilitv: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent Contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. B. Business Auto Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $500,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include: Owned Vehicles, Hired and Non-Owned Vehicles and Employee Non-Ownership. C. Workers' Compensation: Insurance covering all employees meeting Statutory Limits in compliance with the applicable state and federal laws. The coverage must include Employers' Liability with a minimum limit of $500,000 for each accident. Special Requirements: Collier County shall be listed as the Certificate Holder and included as an Additional Insured on the Comprehensive General Liability Policy. Current, valid insurance policies meeting the requirement herein identified shall be maintained by Contractor during the duration of this Agreement. Renewal certificates shall be sent to the County thirty (30) days prior to any expiration date. There shall be a thirty (30) day notification to the County in the event of cancellation or modification of any stipulated insurance coverage. Page 3 of6 16A 6' Contractor shall insure that all subContractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. 11. INDEMNIFICATION. To the maximum extent permitted by Florida law, the Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless Collier County, its officers and employees from any and all liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and paralegals' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Contractor or anyone employed or utilized by the Contractor in the performance of this Agreement. This indemnification obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or reduce any other rights or remedies which otherwise may be available to an indemnified party or person described in this paragraph. This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of Collier County. 12. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of the County by the Code Enforcement Department. 13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Contractor represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder. Contractor further represents that no persons having any such interest shall be employed to perform those services. 14. COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS CONTRACT. This Contract consists of the attached component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the contract as if herein set out verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, Insurance Certificate, Bid #08-4197 Specifi- cations/Scope of Services and Addenda. 15. SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties herein that this agreement is subject to appropriation by the Board of County Commissioners. 16. PROHIBITION OF GIFTS TO COUNTY EMPLOYEES. No organization or individual shall offer or give, either directly or indirectly, any favor, gift, loan, fee, service or other item of value to any County employee, as set forth in Chapter 112, Part III, Florida Statutes, Collier County Ethics Ordinance No. 2004-05, and County Administrative Procedure 5311. Violation of this provision may result in one or more of the following consequences: a. Prohibition by the individual, firm, and/ or any employee of the firm from contact with County staff for a specified period of time; b. Prohibition by the individual and/ or firm from doing business with the County for a specified period of time, including but not limited to: submitting bids, RFP, and/ or quotes; and, c. immediate termination of any contract held by the individual and/ or firm for cause. Page 4 of6 16A 61 17. IMMIGRATION LAW COMPLIANCE. By executing and entering into this agreement, the Contractor is formally acknowledging without exception or stipulation that it is fully responsible for complying with the provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 U.s.e. 1324, et seq. and regulations relating thereto, as either may be amended. Failure by the Contractor to comply with the laws referenced herein shall constitute a breach of this agreement and the County shall have the discretion to unilaterally terminate this agreement immediately. 18. VENUE. Any suit or action brought by either party to this Agreement against the other party relating to or arising out of this Agreement must be brought in the appropriate federal or state courts in Collier County, Florida, which courts have sole and exclusive jurisdiction on all such matters. 19. OFFER EXTENDED TO OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. Collier County encourages and agrees to the successful proposer extending the pricing, terms and conditions of this solicitation or resultant contract to other governmental entities at the discretion of the successful proposer. 20. AGREEMENT TERMS. If any portion of this Agreement is held to be void, invalid, or otherwise unenforceable, in whole or in part, the remaining portion of this Agreement shall remain in effect. 21. ADDITIONAL ITEMS/SERVICES. Additional items and/ or services may be added to this contract upon satisfactory negotiation of price by the Contract Manager and Contactor. Page 5 of6 16A 6 ~~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the County, have each, respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above written. ATTESI' ",q > ' Dwi ,: \ E.' Br'6~'f<;, ~lerk '~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA B)"1 Datea: . Attest ,'f'&\~i~ Slgft.~~}~ c'/" s - .1')' " h- 'I:f"C.-." ~t . By: _ T mg, ai;ma~ Ecosvstem Technologies, Inc. 11 rL 117" we~1 L-. By: Fir\;t W'tness &>\ l\~ ~~ob-=o() tTypejprin itness namet ~ Qo.. Ku..A. f'J--.- Second Witness ~\c:\ (y\. :::TC'N/..S, -:rC) 't'~ld-u..t Typed signature and title Cha.rl~ 1I\.P. ~ u'mplo-. tTypej print witness namet Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Print Name Page 6 of6 From: (941)747~9946 To: 1239~337~4494 Page 2/2 Date 3/10/2008 11 :0337 AM 16A 6 ~,'~ ACORD~ CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE IMMIDDlYVVY) 3/1012008 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTlACATE HOLDER THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. 10002752 I PRODUCER Risk Concepts Corporation 410 43rd Street West Suite N Bradenton, FL 34209 Phone 1~877~746-2209 INSURED Administrative Concepts Corp 406 43rd Street West Bradenton, Fl 34209 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE Insurer A: S~uthem Eagle Insurance Co Reinsurer B: _L1oyds of london Reinsurer c: Aspen Reinsuran~"~_ Reinsurer D: Max Re Bermuda Re:inSl.lrer E Odyssey Re NAIC# AA-1122000 ., m AA..:~gO~37 ~ " ,u~~:l.~90829~__ 23680 COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF' INSURANCE LISTED BElOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TOTHE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTiFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL TI-lE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDlTIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE lIMlTS SHOWN M.A.Y HAVE BEEN REDUCED BVPAID CLAIMS. iNSfi~~'l:::::~~~::-'"^,"-,cmM~'~"E~~,B,~L'-'-'WO-E-'-Ee- ^,- "'-8',,'j-,U u ummu~;~;,;;~~;;;;;; mmm mp;?}~EFFEct"iVEP1iDCY~ifj,~jij;N=~H~~u~~R~~~~ u~;~;;~~uuuuuuumuuuum " ".'. ,_ ' .:ii'~:;'j.:GE.-nrRE:i\::.fOi:5 .m.. .:~8:_:;'_~J~I;;..~_[f;_:;,_l!s:?).r_"L'L~~)___ ~ :-----r---j G.!\llvF, :...lKJF 0 CCCIJR I tj-~"- i_0f~':- ,tJ" GGR,'F. i(';A:rf.I.I~ IT :'''F;'=:I.:f.~ PF.R : ! f','q.ICY 1 PfP-i I i I.'JC \_r::1ii'2,.;,r'i~!,lipnr'>Olll PSf<S~~.tl!,,':".~.J\Q\~~:J..J_IE(~ .!.._------ --- GEN~~AL AC"~-:,p~:,':':'_!_~.____ PR,~;,)IJC'S. ,-;c-"t.p/,' p ~.Gc, ~ : II,UTOM08lLE LIABILITY :~1 H"r-,YAI)FJ i ~-j N I. O'M,lfD /\UTQS I ~..mj SCHF.['~ILF.r-",UTOS I ,_++_ j ~IPFn,\IIIOS I J ~:~~~~~~'mTOS _..no I W__.uuu U____U_) I : GARAGE U....BILl1Y :---1 W ANY Al'F' i i I I i , I uul i i :C'i.-l8INE2>3IN(;.LE 1..IMf;" "_''1 "'cCljl"~f , i I , , I i I u____J I I I 30f)IL'{Il':_::)R'1 "ft;:;-"r:;,."'" 800ILll/':,'UR', ("S' "',.cld<j~l) PR0?Ei'n " Df,~lI,GE (PS'f!C"iri.,"J) ~l.~.g.0~~--=----!:,:~,::"~-:ClDt:::1T ~~ EAI>.CC S _ ~u _u.____u_ J1Y-lEF\~J\,N Aln,~ l'Nt '( : EXC=sStUMME:lLA LIABIliTY ~ ("',"..-.UR 0 ClAIMSMA[of. (-J ,'fJ.1I)(~1't81. F~ : ! :<fTf.l\:TIO~1 (CAer CC(:URRF.t~(f AGG S , , c------.-.-- .1____ A WORKERS COMPENSAnON AND E:MPlOYBt$' L1A.81L1TY AW ;)RO~IETOR,'PARn.;;::R/E;0CUTIVE Oi=f::::F.R,~8v1fifR F:<CI.ti"fO" H yl;~_ de~Ci;h", ""'.~<ii SP.:;CIAL PROVl3iONS 1),,:'1'" OTHER Workers Compensation Excess Coverage I ',~,f:~-1tJ,1'1 1._1 ..)TH, _~.__J~Q.E?Hr:,ll'r.s_L__..l_E?. uu ....................um..._ .fc.~u~::~::.~~.s:.I.~!'!T.....un... L.LQQQ.O.Q.Q_...umun "L.OI~V~"E E.J\EMPLCtYE $ 1,000,000 ::: L. DISl::A.3E . "":<l.ICY UMIT l 1,000,000 Please note that Southerri Eagl8 Insurance Company has relnsur~o ItS ~1~lIities In excess 0 , unaer me po ICles 01 insurance ~sted above with underwriters listed A- or better at the time of placement of such rensurance. Such reinsurance are subject to their own terms, conditions and limin. This is for informational purposes and netting herein shall create any right under such reinsurances. 1/112008 i I I WC0272682-00 11112009 BC DE oeSCRlPnON Of OPERATIONS I LOCATIONSlveHlCLES !EXClU$IONS Aooeo ~ ENDORSEMENT 'SPECIAL PROVISIONS Coverage is extended to the leased employees of alternate employer (Florida Operations Only): Ecosystem Technologies Inc Effective 7/22/2002 021900 DISCLAIMER: This Certificate of Insurance does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s), authorized representative or producer, and the certificate holder, nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the polcies listed thereon, CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF'TH:: ABOVE OE;SCRlBm POLlOES BE CANCELLED BEfORE l"HE EXPIRA. TION Collier County Government Steve Carnell, PurchasinglGS Director 3301 E Tamiami Trail Naples, Fl 34112 DATe: ThleREOF, THE ISSUNG INSURER WILL ENDE....VOR TO MAIL 30 OAYS WRITTFN NOTice TO THE CERTIfiCATE HOLDER NA.MEO TO THE LEfT, BUT FAILURE TO 00 SO SHALL lMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KINO UPON THE INSLRER, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORlZeO REPRESENTATIVe ....--.. Fax# (941) 252-6584 ~..>-.-'-. ... @lACORDCORPORATlON 1988 ACORD 25 (2001/08) This fax was sent with GFI FAXmaker fax server. For more information, visit: http://VY'\'WV,gfi.com From:ALAN WILLIAMS @ ASSOCIATES 239 418 1164 03/10/2008 15:20 #647 P.QJh~IJ\ 6 ACORQ,. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I DATE (MMIDD/VYYYI 03/10/2008 PRODUCER (239)418-1100 FAX (239)418-1164 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Alan Williams & Associates Inc. #1 OHL Y AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE 13700-1 Ben C. Pratt/ HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Six Mile Cypress Pkwy ~yers, Fl 33912 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE HAIC# INSURED Ecosystem TeChnologies Inc. INSURER A;. Ohio ~sualty Group 24074 2223 McGregor Blvd INSURER B: --- .._~ Fort Myers I Fl 33901 INSURER c' --- INSURER O. -- INSURER E ,..nucRA"ce THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF N4Y CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO All THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS POUCY EXPlRATtON'---------- - ~- I!'I!! ~!!.!!: - POLICY EFFECTIVE - TYPE OF INSURANCE POUCY NUMBER UMITS ~ERAL LIABILITY BK052666540 10/16/2007 10/16/2008 EACH OCCURRENCE ~- 1,000 001 X COMMERCIAL CENERAlUABILlTY ~~9E TO RENTED" - . 100 00 I ClAIMS MADE [K] OCCUR MED EXP (An~ one persoo) . 10 , OO( A .x Contractual liab. PERSONAL & ADV INJURY . 1 OOO,OO( - GENERAl AGGREGATE S 2,ODO,OO( ---.-- ~:_ AGGREGATE LDIIIT APPLIES PER PRooueTS - COMP/OP AGG S 2.000,001 ,nPRO- nl POlICY JEeT LOG ~TOIIOBlLE UABIUT't' BAW52666540 10/16/2007 10/16/2008 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT . X ~Y AUlD (Eaaccident) _ 1,000 OO( f'-'- I-- --~--- f-~ ALL OWNED AUTOS BODilY INJURY . SCHEDULEO AUTOS (Per pertiOll) A "- f--- ------ --~ "- HIRED AUTOS BODilY INJURY . NON-OWNED AUTOS (Peraccidenl) f--- "- PROPERTY DAMAGE . (Per accident) RRAGE LlAlllUTV AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIOFNT . ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACe . AUTO ONLY AGG S EXCESSlUMBRIW.A UABUTY ~~H OCCURRENCE. S r:r OCCUR 0 ClAIMS MADE - - AGGREGATE S S -----. R DEDUCTIBLE ~~ S RETENTION . S WORKERS COMPENSATION AND we STATU- IOTH- EMPLOYERS' UABlUTY -- ANY PROPRIETORlPARTNERlEXECUTWE El_ EACH ACCIDENT S -- OFFICERlMEMBER EXCLUDED? E,l DISEASE - EA EMPl.OYE S ~~~~I~~~NS billow E,L DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT S I.P.!H" BK052666540 10/16/2007 10/16/2008 See poliCY schedule A ~?mmercial Property & $250,000 Value Rented/leased IJ,nland Marine $500 Deductible ~RIPTlON OF OPERATIONS I {OCAT1ON81 VEHICLE81 ~CLU.ION. ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT 18PlQAL PROVaSIQN8 o lier County is ncluded as ad itional insured with respect to General liability. C Collier County Government 3301 E Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 SHOULD ANY Of' THE ABOVE DESCRtBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXptRATlON DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER Will ENDEAVOR TO MAlL -12- DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE lEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICe SHALL I"POSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABlUTY OF ANY KIND UPON THe INSURER., ITS AGENTS-OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE .... Jeff Wi 11i ams ACORD 25 (2001108) FAX: (239)252-6584 ~ :; steve- Co-v rLe. (I -_~~"'-UlU~'. -. -.'- 16A 6"~ MEMORANDUM Date: February 21, 2008 To: Brenda Brilhart, Purchasing Agent Purchasing Department From: Ann Jennejohn, Sr. Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Contract #08-4197: "Nuisance Abatement Services" Contractor: Environmental Mowing, Inc. Attached please find the original contract document, as referenced above, (Agenda Item #16A6) approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. The Minutes & Records Department has also retained an original copy which will be kept as part of the Board's permanent record. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-7240. Thank you. Attachments ...--_.._--_._,-~.,~"-~_..._.. ......-----..-"--,,--.--. ITEM NO.:o& -I?tc- Dr.8?:,O 16A 6~ . J,'" ,._ . " i~'..-P 1\ ~::~~ f '. '; I ) h J II \'1, '1)1r."IC:"\, J, \;_ I DATE RECEIVED: ?-,1'"IP 't ' ~',,: ':-':,20 ,. '-"1 ',f" I.):, FILE NO.: ROUTED TO: DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS LINE REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES Date: March 19,2008 To: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney From: Brenda Brilhart Purchasing Agent 239-252-8446 Re: Contract #08-4197 Nuisance Abatement Services Contractor: Environmental Mowing, Inc. BACKGROUND OF REQUEST: This contract was approved by the BCC on February 26,2008; Agenda Item 16.A.6 This item has not been previously submitted. ACTION REQUESTED: Contract review and approval. OTHER COMMENTS: Please forward to BCC for signature after approval. If there are any questions concerning the docwnent, please contact me. Purchasing would appreciate notification when the documents exit your office. Thank you. 3/Jo/15 y -~ T d.uJdJ tf-'Y~.fi:) c.v~ "3- ~'1_i}Fr 16ft, 6-' MEMORANDUM TO: Jeff Walker Risk Management Department FROM: Brenda Brilhart Purchasing Department DATE: March 19,2008 RE: Review of Insurance for Contract No. 08-4197 Nuisance Abatement Services Contractor: Environmental Mowing, Inc This Contract was approved by the BCC on February 26, 2008; Agenda Itern16.A.6. Please review Insurance Certificate in this Agreement for the above-referenced contract. If everything is acceptable, please forward to the County Attorney for further review and approval. Also will you advise me when it has been forwarded. Thank you. If you have any questions, please contact me at extension 8446. ~ 1/ :>/z... () I' 't 16A 6 A G R E E MEN T 08-4197 for Nuisance Abatement Services THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this 26th day of February, 2008, by and between Environmental Mowing, Inc., authorized to do business in the State of Florida, whose business address is 445 - 18th Avenue SE, Naples, Florida 34117, hereinafter called the "Contractor" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Collier County, Naples, hereinafter called the "County": WITNESSETH: 1. COMMENCEMENT. The contract shall be for a one (1) year period, commencing on February 26, 2008, and terminating on February 25, 2009. The County may, at its discretion and with the consent of the Contractor, renew the Agreement under all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement for three (3) additional one (1) year periods. The County shall give the Contractor written notice of the County's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior to the end of the Agreement term then in effect. 2. STATEMENT OF WORK. The Contractor shall provide invasive plant removal and additional services, as Primary awardee, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Bid #08-4197 and the Contractor's proposal referred to herein and made an integral part of this agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties and any modifications to this Agreement shall be mutually agreed upon in writing by the Contractor and the County Project Manager or his designee, in compliance with the County Purchasing Policy and Administrative Procedures in effect at the time such services are authorized. 3. COMPENSATION. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Agreement the aggregate of the units actually ordered and furnished at the unit price. Any county agency may purchase products and services under this contract, provided sufficient funds are included in their budget(s). Payment will be made upon receipt of a proper invoice and upon approval by the Project Manager or his designee, and in compliance with Section 218.70, Fla. Stats., otherwise known as the "Florida Prompt Payment Act". Page 1 of6 16 l~ 6"~ 4. NOTICES. All notices from the County to the Contractor shall be deemed duly served if mailed or faxed to the Contractor at the following Address: Environmental Mowing, Inc. 4145 -18th Avenue SE Naples, Florida 34117 Attention: KennethJ. Parker, President Telephone: 239-825-4321 Facsimile: 239-455-2777 All Notices from the Contractor to the County shall be deemed duly served if mailed or faxed to the County to: Collier County Government Center Purchasing Department - Purchasing Building 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, Florida 34112 Attention: Steve Carnell, Purchasing/GS Director Telephone: 239-252-8371 Facsimile: 239-252-6584 The Contractor and the County may change the above mailing address at any time upon giving the other party written notification. All notices under this Agreement must be in writing. 5. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating a partnership between the County and the Contractor or to constitute the Contractor as an agent of the County. 6. PERMITS: LICENSES: TAXES. In compliance with Section 218.80, FS., all permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be obtained by the Contractor. Payment for all such permits issued by the County shall be processed internally by the County. All non-County permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be procured and paid for by the Contractor. The Contractor shall also be solely responsible for payment of any and all taxes levied on the Contractor. In addition, the Contractor shall comply with all rules, regulations and laws of Collier County, the State of Florida, or the U. S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. The Contractor agrees to comply with all laws governing the responsibility of an employer with respect to persons employed by the Contractor. 7. NO IMPROPER USE. The Contractor will not use, nor suffer or permit any person to use in any manner whatsoever, county facilities for any improper, immoral or offensive purpose, or for any purpose in violation of any federal, state, county or municipal Page 2 of6 16A 6'~ ordinance, rule, order or regulation, or of any governmental rule or regulation now in effect or hereafter enacted or adopted. In the event of such violation by the Contractor or if the County or its authorized representative shall deem any conduct on the part of the Contractor to be objectionable or improper, the County shall have the right to suspend the contract of the Contractor. Should the Contractor fail to correct any such violation, conduct, or practice to the satisfaction of the County within twenty-four (24) hours after receiving notice of such violation, conduct, or practice, such suspension to continue until the violation is cured. The Contractor further agrees not to commence operation during the suspension period until the violation has been corrected to the satisfaction of the County. 8. TERMINATION. Should the Contractor be found to have failed to perform his services in a manner satisfactory to the County as per this Agreement, the County may terminate said agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a thirty (30) day written notice. The County shall be sole judge of non-performance. 9. NO DISCRIMINATION. The Contractor agrees that there shall be no discrimination as to race, sex, color, creed or national origin. 10. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall provide insurance as follows: A. Commercial General Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent Contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. B. Business Auto Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $500,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include: Owned Vehicles, Hired and Non-Owned Vehicles and Employee Non-Ownership. C. Workers' Compensation: Insurance covering all employees meeting Statutory Limits in compliance with the applicable state and federal laws. The coverage must include Employers' Liability with a minimum limit of $500,000 for each accident. Special Requirements: Collier County shall be listed as the Certificate Holder and included as an Additional Insured on the Comprehensive General Liability Policy. Current, valid insurance policies meeting the requirement herein identified shall be maintained by Contractor during the duration of this Agreement. Renewal certificates shall be sent to the County thirty (30) days prior to any expiration date. Page 3 of6 16,A 6 There shall be a thirty (30) day notification to the County in the event of cancellation or modification of any stipulated insurance coverage. Contractor shall insure that all subContractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. 11. INDEMNIFICATION. To the maximum extent permitted by Florida law, the Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless Collier County, its officers and employees from any and all liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and paralegals' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Contractor or anyone employed or utilized by the Contractor in the performance of this Agreement. This indemnification obligation shaH not be construed to negate, abridge or reduce any other rights or remedies which otherwise may be available to an indemnified party or person described in this paragraph. This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of Collier County. 12. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of the County by the Code Enforcement Department. 13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Contractor represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder. Contractor further represents that no persons having any such interest shall be employed to perform those services. 14. COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS CONTRACT. This Contract consists of the attached component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the contract as if herein set out verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, Insurance Certificate, Bid #08-4197 Specifi- cationsjScope of Services and Addenda. 15. SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties herein that this agreement is subject to appropriation by the Board of County Commissioners. 16. PROHIBITION OF GIFTS TO COUNTY EMPLOYEES. No organization or individual shall offer or give, either directly or indirectly, any favor, gift, loan, fee, service or other item of value to any County employee, as set forth in Chapter 112, Part III, Florida Statutes, Collier County Ethics Ordinance No. 2004-05, and County Administrative Procedure 5311. Violation of this provision may result in one or more of the following consequences: a. Prohibition by the individual, firm, andj or any employee of the firm from contact with County staff for a specified period of time; b. Prohibition by the individual andj or firm from doing business with the County for a specified period of time, including but not limited to: submitting bids, RFP, andj or Page 4 of6 16A 6' quotes; and, c. immediate termination of any contract held by the individual and; or firm for cause. 17. IMMIGRATION LAW COMPLIANCE. By executing and entering into this agreement, the Contractor is formally acknowledging without exception or stipulation that it is fully responsible for complying with the provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 U.s.e. 1324, et seq. and regulations relating thereto, as either may be amended. Failure by the Contractor to comply with the laws referenced herein shall constitute a breach of this agreement and the County shall have the discretion to unilaterally terminate this agreement immediately. 18. VENUE. Any suit or action brought by either party to this Agreement against the other party relating to or arising out of this Agreement must be brought in the appropriate federal or state courts in Collier County, Florida, which courts have sole and exclusive jurisdiction on all such matters. 19. OFFER EXTENDED TO OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. Collier County encourages and agrees to the successful proposer extending the pricing, terms and conditions of this solicitation or resultant contract to other governmental entities at the discretion of the successful proposer. 20. AGREEMENT TERMS. If any portion of this Agreement is held to be void, invalid, or otherwise unenforceable, in whole or in part, the remaining portion of this Agreement shall remain in effect. 21. ADDITIONAL ITEMS/SERVICES. Additional items and; or services may be added to this contract upon satisfactory negotiation of price by the Contract Manager and Contactor. Page 5 of6 16A 61 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the County, have each, respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above written. Bt: Dafoed: Atteltl~~- ~ 1 OIlaturt Ofll. ;;;,~", BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: . Environmental Mowing, Inc. Contractor aM~L<- lu t-I-<-. . First Witness By: ~J,a~ C RIST/j\,A M Y;1i2kr?K. tType/printwitn7t J'Jtc--z..-~2A . Second Witness f<ENf'/ETH J Pi..JRkt(2 .PRc3//Jt.IJT Typed signature and title flMfj]YV H kj}!/rA/ tType/print witness namet Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~ Print Name Page 6 of6 03/17/2008 16:22 FAX 2393483994 CARR AND ASSOC 16A 6 1ili002 THE POUdES"O ANY REQUIREM MAY PERTAIN_ T POLICIES.. AGGR INSR Alll)'L -. GENE Oco DC! A 0 0 0 G~N'L o PO AUTO =:J A LJ A 0 '0 s 18 H N LJ - -- --.- D_ OARA 0 18 , , .XCE 0 0 0 0 0 10 R WORKERS C - EMPLOYERS' A ANY PROPRI OFFICER 'ME If yes, describe SPEQ.!AL P~Q OTHER ?~".~~~,ERTIFICA TE OF LIAl,l~ ~,-,-, ~~T~I'!, ~ 15,,'~s~Ets A"MATT, ,E, R"O, [,F, I:~~,~,~r""i-~~~ '_-1 ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE I 4735 Santa Barba,. Boulevard HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR , Nap'.'. FL 34104 __ AL TER TH!"J:;OVEBI\.G"__;~FORDJiQJ)' TI:lE POlICIE~ BEL_OV\[.__ ,____ Phon. (~39)348:35~__ Fax (239)345-3994 IINl!l,I~S_R_S AFFORDIN~~OVERAGE__ _ I NAI~_#__ t. . . lNSURERA: First Commerciallnsul'ance Co. INSURED Environmental Mowing mc ~S~;~R5: - -, ' -- - ---------- ---"- 414518thAveSe ]INsuRe~c:-:=~ ------ NAPLES, FL 34117- 'INSURER_D ___=---________ _ _I _ ______ ____ INS~,RER ~'--____ _________, COVERAGES INSURER F: F INSURANCE L.,ISTeO HAVE BEENI'SSUED fa THE INSUREO NAMED ABOVE FOR THr! POLicy PERioD"iNDICATE;O. NOTWITHSTAND1NG- ENT, TE~M OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WliH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS ceRTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR HE INSURANCE. AFFO~DED BY THE POllC1ES DESCRI8ED HeR~IN !S SUBJ~CT TO ALL THE TE;RMS. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH EGAn. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS, .TYPE OF INSU....;.CE~~~LI~~~~~~"~ IP~~V~~~~E ~~ff.;~:;::r~lN ---------- RAL LIABILITY MMERCIAL Ge.N~AAL UABILITY CLAIMS MADE D OCCUR LIMITS ...,--.-- ~ EACH OCCUFt~ENCE =t DAMAGE TO RENTED -- !_~!;MISES_tEa. oCCUJ~~L _ __ ~~_ EXP (Any ?~~person) _ __ ___".. PERSONAL & AOV INJURY --- -- - -- GENERALAGG~EGATE __. 1 I_:ODUCTS. C:~IO:~ ___ , COMBINEO SINGLE LIMIT I ,~~~!~~dl:n~~RY- ----".. W!r per!Q!!L_ BODILY INJURY , ::~.:~~t~AMAGE ".,-~-..-. (PerlaCCident) AU1-0 ON_~Y~-~A- ACCIOEN!, '" "_ .~. OTHE;R THAN EA Ace __~~T~?~~_.. _..-~GG-~' ~. EACH OCCURRENCE -.-. ---- AGGRI:GATE AGGREGATE LIMIT APPlll:;S PER: L1c:Y 0 PROJE~P LOC __. MOBILE L.IABll.ITY NY AUTO Ll OWNED AUTOS CHEDULED AUTOS IRED AUTOS ON OWNED AUTOS GE LIABILITY ANY AUTO SSIUMBRI!!LLA LIABIUTY CCUR 0 CLAIMS MAOE eOUCTlBLE ETENTION $ O~:I~~TlONAND--- TBD 03/17108 03/17/09 -n1:'S:~~SI~~w.s :0 ~BH~ _ IITOR I PARTNER J EXECUTIVE _ E_~ EAC!:, AC~~~~~ _ 500,000 MSER EXCLUDED? Yes I ' n. OISEAS". EA EMPLOYEE 500,000 . _ __ ___ ~1~~NSbeIOW L__ _ _____J ------- ~~_ ____ _ I n'~I~~ASE~POl'CYL",,~T ---- 500,000 I DESCRIPTION OF OpeRATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLes I E"ClUSIONS ADDEO ay ENDORSEMENT I SPECIAL PROVISIONS C'" "","'" ""." 0" C,.U", M ".., CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELlATION Collier County Government Center Purchasing Department.Purchasing Building 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 I ACORD 2S (200ii05) -ell'" SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVIf DESCRIBED POUCIES aE CANceLLED BEFORE THE EXPIfU.TION DATE TltEfU!OF, THE I$SUING INSURER Will ENDeAVOR TO MAil 20 CAYS WRITTEN NOTICe TO TME CERTIFICATE HOL.OER NAMeD TO THE LEFT, BUT FAilURE TO 00 $0 SHALL IMPose NO OBL.rGATloN OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THe INSURI!R, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIveS. - . "-.-.------.---. ........--..-- AUTHORIZEO REPRESENTATIVE; _.L . :oV'- . ." - 'i;j)ACORO--CORPORATION1955 CARR AND ASSOC Sander'S ~ax 10: Olson & DINunzio InS" 16A 6 141003 03/17/2008 16:22 FAX 2393483994 Date; 3/17/2008 03:54 PM Pagl!l Z af2 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE rho canpany lndioated below cortifies that tho 1nsurance afforded by the pOlicy or policles numbered and described belew'is in force as o~ th~ effective dat~ of th1s cert1f1c~te. This Certificate of Insurance do~~ not amend. @xtend, or otherwise alter the Terms and Cond1tions of Insuranc@ coverage conta1~@d in any pol1cy numoered end described balow. CERTIFICATE HOLDER, COLUER COUNTY PURCHASI~G DEPT 3301 TAMIAMI TR E NAPLES, FL 34112 INSURED, ENVIRONMENTAL MOWING INC 4145 18TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34117-9175 I I I I I I I I I I I I I [ J other Liability I I I I I I , I I I I I [ ) Umbrella Form I I I I I I I I Should any of the abOve described policIes be cancelled before the exp1rat1~ date. the insuranca company will mail 30 days written not1c~ to the above na~ed cert1f1cate holder. I TYPE OF INSURANCE I LIABILITY I [Xl Liab11ity and I Medical Expense I [X] Personal and , Adv~rtis1n9 Injuryl [XJ Medical E<pen.es I [Xl Fire Legal I Liability I I I I I I I I I I I I I I POLICY NUMBER & ISSUING CO. 77-AC-826130-3001 NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. I POLICY I POLICY I IEFF. DATE IEXP. DATE I I 0[-27-08 I 01-27-09 I I I I Any One Occurrence__...___ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LIMITS OF LIABILITY (~LIMITS AT INCEPTION) I I I $ 1.000.000 I I I I 5.000 r 100.000 I I 2,000.000 I 1,000.000 I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I DESCRIPTIO~ OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL !TEMS sn:VE CARNELL CERT HOLDER AlSO LISTEO AS AOOlrIONAL INSURED Any On. Person/Org _.... _ _ I 1.000.000 ANY ONE PERSON _.......... $ Any One Fire or Explosion $ ~en8ral Aggreg~te~ ....... $ Prod/Comp Ops Aggreg~te* . S AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY [ J RUSINESS AUTO Bodily Injury (Ead, Person) ........., 1- (Each Accldont) .__..... I Property Damage (Each Accident) ........ I CQmblned Single Limit .... I [ 1 awned [ 1 Hired [ ] NOn-owned EXCESS LIABILITY ~ach Occurrence .......... $ Prod/Comp Ops/01sease Aggregate* ..._....~__.. S I STATliTORY L1MlTS I BODILY INJURY/ACCIDENT _.. $ J Bodily Injury by Diso.se I EACH EMPLOYEE _....____. $ I Bodily Injury by Disease I POLlCY LIMIT ........ _ __ $ [ J Workers' Compensat1on and ( ] Eilip10yer.' L 1abll1ty Effective Date Of Certificate, 01-27-2008 Oate Certificate ISSUed, 03-17-2006 Authorized Representative: PHIL DINUNZIO Countersigned at, 2536 NORTHB~KE PLAZA OR NAPLES. FL 341)9 Mar,I8, 2008 9: 12PM No. 405~ 9 ~I 6 ACORD :;;,.~..,..,.,..~,;O;--"l'-:-,,,,,......,...,--rrr~r">~~"'l-'''''''~'''''~':::'f.''J1'':'!;;;.''''r"7':1fJ11">;!f'' ',~''''~ '~'".'ltP 1.., . J. ;;I'~ -<. ~., _' J',;' "'.. ."_"_'>::l.~ :o!P, '.' ~'If'\ ~,~.~'~""1;",1 ;o;,~J .'" ,~~w)'~.... .~_ _ ."J',l""~'\ .~.#..~,~~"". l~~.:.- i'I.:"~ "~'-U" J 1- \~,:, f_ '0 JE':'-.(:.'.d..k.b..p,' ""S'- ':1..'-:,' iU,.1"'lf'Vt~1~"-""","1 2E~j.:~:;~~{['" - ~:;~.':, "';;~L~__:~.,~'-J~ __';;~~\d:;;:....~~t:iL,!iJ DATE (MflNDDfYY) pAoovei:R Steve Roe Allstate Insurance Agency 5628 Strand Boulevard, Suite 2 Naples, Florida 34110 Phone 239~593.7333 Fax 239-593-7334 Toll Free 677-744-11;176 3/1812008 THIS CER,TlFICAU IS IssueoASA MATT1!!ROF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS N RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIfICATE 110LDER.. THIS OEftTlf1CA.TE DOES NOT AMEND EXTIiiNP OR ALTeR THE COViiilVoG5 AFFOR:tlW BY THliO pOl.IClea BE;:I,.QW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY ALLSTATE; A COMPANY . COMPANY C COMPANY D p. ~ , TI-lIS IS TO CiORTIFYTHAT THE POLtCIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN 155UEOrO!HE INSUR6D NAMED ABOVE FOR n-lE POLICY PE.RIOD INOtCATEO, NOTWITHSTAI>{DING ANY REQUIREl\llENT. TEFl;M bR CONOITION QF: ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT \NrTH RESPECT TO WHICH THis CERTIFICATE MAY ElE 16SUED OR MAY PERrAlfII:THE INSuRANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES OESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE rl!.RMS, EXCI..IJ$IONS AND CONDlTloNS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE. BEEN REDUCED B PAID CLAIMS ,"'!lURED KENNETH PARKER 4145 18TH AVE SE NAPLES FL 34117 00 on 'NpeOF,N~URANCE l'OI.lCyNU....~R PQ\'CYijF\"IOCl'M: lIOl'~Y~"''''M.nON LIU.r!I DATE(~WOOIYY) o.o.~(M~ GENI::R.AI,....GCR.E~TE PROouCTS - eOMPIOP ~EFI,80NAL&ADV INJUR EACH OCCURREr>lCE! FIRE DA"IAGE: (Iv"y~. MED EJo;P (AnYONlp<l<S'al) 3880785127S 3/18/08 3/18/09 COMBINEO SINGLE LIMIT 2005 DRJ500 VIN-22166 eODlLYINJUR'T' $500.000 I $500,000 (P....~r"'D"'Pllrllodlk\rl!) GeN'i:RAlllQ'''11Y X CO?,\MeRCIAl GEfIIEAAl "un' CLAIMS MADE Do<:cul'l OVI'NCR'S" COlllrntlCTORS PROT AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ALLSTATE A)('("UlO AlLOWNEO^UTOS X SCHEOULEDAVTOS HIRED AUTOS PROPER.TYDi'!.1AGI:: $500,000 . NON-QWNEO ....UTOI;I UEOICAL PAY!oENT $5,000 GARAGE UA8l11lY AUro ONLY. EA ANVA,UTO OTHER THAT AUTO EACHAG'GIDENT AGGR.EGA.TE EACH OGCURRENCE UMOOELl.}.. FOR~ AGGR.EG^TE OTHER THAN lJMBRELL1\ WOftKERS COMPeNSAflON AND EMPLO'wl!RSllAllILI1Y TIlEPROPRIETORI PAR.TNERS/E}(ECUTIV EOFFICERGARE:: OiliER \Net. El D1&:ASE - POLICY '^cc 6~1)IIOEA6E-EA DI!.SCRIMIOt>l OF oPeR.ATIDN!tILOCAT10NBlVEH1GLEWliPEGiAL lTEMli COlliER COUNTY GOVERNMENT IS liSTED AS 80TH A CERTIFICATE HOLDER AND AN ADDITIONAl INSURED FOR THIS POLICY. . COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 3301 E TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34112 ATTN BRENDA BRILHART 5HOULO AtN Of TI-lIi ABOVE OIi.SCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFOfUi IHti: EXPI~TlON DATE THER.EDF, THE ISSUINO COMPANY WlL.l.. ENOEAvOR TO MAl 3~ DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTlFJCI\TI; HOLO!;R. NAPJIED TO THE LEfT. BUT OOLURE TO MA1L3IJCH A NoncE $1-lA,LL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UNN tHe OOMPAI\IY, ITS; AGENTS OR REPRE3ENTATNE3. AurtlOltIZEDREI"FlEe.EHTATIlIE 1616 I~~ MEMORANDUM Date: February 21, 2008 To: Brenda Brilhart, Purchasing Agent Purchasing Department From: Ann Jennejohn, Sr. Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Contract #08-4197: "Nuisance Abatement Services" Contractor: Environmental Mowing, Inc. Attached please find the original contract document, as referenced above, (Agenda Item #16A6) approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. The Minutes & Records Department has also retained an original copy which will be kept as part of the Board's permanent record. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-7240. Thank you. Attachments 16A6 A G R E E MEN T 08-4197 for Nuisance Abatement Services THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this 26th day of February, 2008, by and between Environmental Mowing, Inc., authorized to do business in the State of Florida, whose business address is 445 -18th Avenue SE, Naples, Florida 34117, hereinafter called the "Contractor" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Collier County, Naples, hereinafter called the "County": WIT N E SSE T H: 1. COMMENCEMENT. The contract shall be for a one (1) year period, commencing on February 26, 2008, and terminating on February 25, 2009. The County may, at its discretion and with the consent of the Contractor, renew the Agreement under all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement for three (3) additional one (1) year periods. The County shall give the Contractor written notice of the County's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior to the end of the Agreement term then in effect. 2. STATEMENT OF WORK. The Contractor shall provide invasive plant removal and additional services, as Primary awardee, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Bid #08-4197 and the Contractor's proposal referred to herein and made an integral part of this agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties and any modifications to this Agreement shall be mutually agreed upon in writing by the Contractor and the County Project Manager or his designee, in compliance with the County Purchasing Policy and Administrative Procedures in effect at the time such services are authorized. 3. COMPENSATION. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Agreement the aggregate of the units actually ordered and furnished at the unit price. Any county agency may purchase products and services under this contract, provided sufficient funds are included in their budget(s). Payment will be made upon receipt of a proper invoice and upon approval by the Project Manager or his designee, and in compliance with Section 218.70, Fla. Stats., otherwise known as the "Florida Prompt Payment Act". Page 1 of6 16A6 4. NOTICES. All notices from the County to the Contractor shall be deemed duly served if mailed or faxed to the Contractor at the following Address: Environmental Mowing, Inc. 4145 -18th Avenue SE Naples, Florida 34117 Attention: Kenneth J. Parker, President Telephone: 239-825-4321 Facsimile: 239-455-2777 All Notices from the Contractor to the County shall be deemed duly served if mailed or faxed to the County to: Collier County Government Center Purchasing Department - Purchasing Building 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, Florida 34112 Attention: Steve Carnell, Purchasing/GS Director Telephone: 239-252-8371 Facsimile: 239-252-6584 The Contractor and the County may change the above mailing address at any time upon giving the other party written notification. All notices under this Agreement must be in writing. 5. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating a partnership between the County and the Contractor or to constitute the Contractor as an agent of the County. 6. PERMITS: LICENSES: TAXES. In compliance with Section 218.80, F.5., all permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be obtained by the Contractor. Payment for all such permits issued by the County shall be processed internally by the County. All non-County permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be procured and paid for by the Contractor. The Contractor shall also be solely responsible for payment of any and all taxes levied on the Contractor. In addition, the Contractor shall comply with all rules, regulations and laws of Collier County, the State of Florida, or the U. S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. The Contractor agrees to comply with all laws governing the responsibility of an employer with respect to persons employed by the Contractor. 7. NO IMPROPER USE. The Contractor will not use, nor suffer or permit any person to use in any manner whatsoever, county facilities for any improper, immoral or offensive purpose, or for any purpose in violation of any federal, state, county or municipal Page 201'6 16A6 ordinance, rule, order or regulation, or of any governmental rule or regulation now in effect or hereafter enacted or adopted. In the event of such violation by the Contractor or if the County or its authorized representative shall deem any conduct on the part of the Contractor to be objectionable or improper, the County shall have the right to suspend the contract of the Contractor. Should the Contractor fail to correct any such violation, conduct, or practice to the satisfaction of the County within twenty-four (24) hours after receiving notice of such violation, conduct, or practice, such suspension to continue until the violation is cured. The Contractor further agrees not to commence operation during the suspension period until the violation has been corrected to the satisfaction of the County. 8. TERMINATION. Should the Contractor be found to have failed to perform his services in a manner satisfactory to the County as per this Agreement, the County may terminate said agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a thirty (30) day written notice. The County shall be sole judge of non-performance. 9. NO DISCRIMINATION. The Contractor agrees that there shall be no discrimination as to race, sex, color, creed or national origin. 10. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall provide insurance as follows: A. Commercial General Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent Contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. B. Business Auto Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $500,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include: Owned Vehicles, Hired and Non-Owned Vehicles and Employee Non-Ownership. C. Workers' Com{'ensation: Insurance covering all employees meeting Statutory Limits in compliance with the applicable state and federal laws. The coverage must include Employers' Liability with a minimum limit of $500,000 for each accident. Special Requirements: Collier County shall be listed as the Certificate Holder and included as an Additional Insured on the Comprehensive General Liability Policy. Current, valid insurance policies meeting the requirement herein identified shall be maintained by Contractor during the duration of this Agreement. Renewal certificates shall be sent to the County thirty (30) days prior to any expiration date. Page 3 of6 16A6 There shall be a thirty (30) day notification to the County in the event of cancellation or modification of any stipulated insurance coverage. Contractor shall insure that all subContractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. 11. INDEMNIFICATION. To the maximum extent permitted by Florida law, the Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless Collier County, its officers and employees from any and all liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and paralegals' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Contractor or anyone employed or utilized by the Contractor in the performance of this Agreement. This indemnification obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or reduce any other rights or remedies which otherwise may be available to an indemnified party or person described in this paragraph. This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of Collier County. 12. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of the County by the Code Enforcement Department. 13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Contractor represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder. Contractor further represents that no persons having any such interest shall be employed to perform those services. 14. COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS CONTRACT. This Contract consists of the attached component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the contract as if herein set out verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, Insurance Certificate, Bid #08-4197 Specifi- cations/Scope of Services and Addenda. 15. SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties herein that this agreement is subject to appropriation by the Board of County Commissioners. 16. PROHIBITION OF GIFTS TO COUNTY EMPLOYEES. No organization or individual shall offer or give, either directly or indirectly, any favor, gift, loan, fee, service or other item of value to any County employee, as set forth in Chapter 112, Part III, Florida Statutes, Collier County Ethics Ordinance No. 2004-05, and County Administrative Procedure 5311. Violation of this provision may result in one or more of the following consequences: a. Prohibition by the individual, firm, and/ or any employee of the firm from contact with County staff for a specified period of time; b. Prohibition by the individual and/ or firm from doing business with the County for a specified period of time, including but not limited to: submitting bids, RFP, and/ or Page 401'6 16A6 quotes; and, c. immediate termination of any contract held by the individual and/ or firm for cause. 17. IMMIGRATION LAW COMPLIANCE. By executing and entering into this agreement, the Contractor is formally acknowledging without exception or stipulation that it is fully responsible for complying with the provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 US.c. 1324, et seq. and regulations relating thereto, as either may be amended. Failure by the Contractor to comply with the laws referenced herein shall constitute a breach of this agreement and the County shall have the discretion to unilaterally terminate this agreement immediately. 18. VENUE. Any suit or action brought by either party to this Agreement against the other party relating to or arising out of this Agreement must be brought in the appropriate federal or state courts in Collier County, Florida, which courts have sole and exclusive jurisdiction on all such matters. 19. OFFER EXTENDED TO OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. Collier County encourages and agrees to the successful proposer extending the pricing, terms and conditions of this solicitation or resultant contract to other governmental entities at the discretion of the successful proposer. 20. AGREEMENT TERMS. If any portion of this Agreement is held to be void, invalid, or otherwise unenforceable, in whole or in part, the remaining portion of this Agreement shall remain in effect. 21. ADDITIONAL ITEMS/SERVICES. Additional items and/ or services may be added to this contract upon satisfactory negotiation of price by the Contract Manager and Contactor. Page 5 01'6 16A6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the County, have each, respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above written. ct.I'.lLJP ". " AT~tiST: ' " '/ ~ight ID ~~!",ii;.C~C=,t" ... .,- ~', ~ J?y::' ) ~"~ ' "/ .~ t AtttIt. ( ..'..... . s 1 Qilat..... ' <Mt 1 . <<"/2/1 C~~ l.(.::/ ,~l-t-........ t_l j(/I.-.......(...r.... First Witness (J r< I snit":) M, /j; K k: c''R. tType j pri~lt wif!;tne~spame t /1 J--:-c ~ 4-;7 . / 0-L~ . , '/ / _ _ I - Second Witness /J1J9m.1/ f} kIJL/~-yJ , tTypejprint witness namet Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Print Name Page 6 01'6 By: Environmental Mowing, Inc. Contractor By: ~/h/n~ftl' 124- SIgna re kt--tJNU!-I"T, r~;:}koc '^J.f:"SIMd7. Typed signature and title .....-"""L ACC7>RLI ,.... ~ oa/17/2008 16:23 FAX 2393483994 CARR AND ASSOC ~002 CERT.lfIC~TE OF LIABILITY I~.~URANCE .__._~~F, THIS CeRTIFICATE IS ISSUI!D AS A MAnER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFBIU NO RIGHTS UPON 'Ill. CERTIFICATE ~ HO~DiR. TtlIS ceRTIFICATE DOES NOT AMl!ND, eXTEND OR ,..F'~ (~~~)~48:39Q4, ",. . ~N~~~:~~j:~~~~~~~v, ~:::=~',II:Y TH.E ~~L~\~;~~OW' """ ~!!Mll.A: First Comm.~!~j!l.I,I.!l!,!rance Co. ,'. "__ INSURED Environmental Mowing inc 41461Slh Ave Se INSO..!ml&_...__ IN U~ER <;:..__.... ..". ' NAPLES, FL 34117- IUS I "',," , IN.!1!i.~_E: COVERAGES INSURSR F: . THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED HAVEBEEN ISSUED TO THe INSUReD NAMED A80vi FOR THE POLICY peRIOD INDICATeD. NO'IWITHSTANClNO--'-"- AKY IIIQUIRE!.IENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF fUlY CONTIlACT OR OTHER OOCUMENT WITH REspeCT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFPDRDBD BY THE POLICies DBSCRIBED HEREIN IS SUIlJECT TO ALL THE TEIIMS, eXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS 0' SUCH POlJCIES,:.. AIJGREGATB LIMITS !lHOWN MAY HAVE.S!,EN. R!'DUCED IlY PAID C,-!\!M.~, . .._..., '. 1N8R ADD'L POI.IeV 1lFF&CTlV~ POUCY IXftIMTlON T't!~~ OF INsuRANCE POLleY NUM~ER ~YI M~, . ..!lATE (MMlDDN'Y~ UMfT'8 OENERA~ UAIlILITY EACH OCCURReNCE o CD...-rERCIAL GeNeRAL LIABILITY i5Ali!AGE TO ReNTED -" '~.. P.,REMISES l~ "CCIl_) _.. , A 0 00 CLAIMS MADE 0 occu~ M~!XP~"".p..""'.) ,'. .. . 8 _ 1:,:..,~,,~,,~,~~~",j::l,J,TE,~.:,.~,Go..".'.t-, "--._,., GEN'L AGCR!!2^TE LIMIT APPLies PER:' f 1-....: D.poLlCY U PROJECT..g LOC _ AUTOMOBU LIAJlIUTY o ANY AUTO o ALL OWNec AUTOS o 0 SCHEOULED AUiOS B HIReD AUTOS NON OWNED AUTOS o n PROOUC)!ll Carr (I A88oolale$ 4735 Santa Barbara Boulevard Naples, FL 3<1104 Phon" (239)348-3555 COMBINED SINOL.e: L.IMIT JEa "''''.,9"" BODILY INJURY (per ~.rson 80DIL V INJURY (Po, accIaenQ PROPe~TY DAMAGE 1P.!tocckl8nQ_._ AUTO ONLY :~ "C,CIDENT OTHER THAN ~ AUTO DNLY~.... ... A ,~~H OCClJ~!!~NC,~ '" AGGREGATE .'n..._.._....___....._ GARAGE LiAII'UTY o 0 MlYAUTO Q.. I/XCESSlUMBRIlLLA LiAIIlLITY o OCCU~ 0 CLAIMS MAOE o o DECUC118LE o RETENTION . ...-..,..- , woRKiRi'COMPENSATIONANO ,1.,----.. .--_. O.....-.......cr-- '.,. eMPLOYBR8'UAIIIUTY TBD 03/17/08 03/17/09 ,,:r.~Ii..ll?~s_ glr' A ON( PROPRIETOR 1 PARiNBRI EXECUTIVE ~,~~,~<<9.EENT_.....__ DFFICER/MIMleR EXCLUDED? Yes E.L9'!!..EASE,~EA .eMPL.O,'y~E tr)'8l. deearib& under - "',~ ~.RO\l)"SIONS boJow._.. ...__"_" ......." ...."".._-+~J,c~~.EI\SE, PDLI9YLlMIT .,. OTHIIR.._......, , .."..__....,.._....... ,..___... ,......_,_".,~........ DESCRIPTlON OF OPERATIONS I LOCAllONS I VEHICLI81 EXCLUSIONe ADDID BY eNDORe.MENT I specIAL PROVISIONS excluded Partners: Kenneth J Parker and Cristina M Parker 500.1.000 /lOO,OOO 5.0"0.oojl CERTIFlCATIi HOLDER -' ,'-"-'-' CA/oICI!~LATlON ...___ u. .... SHOULD /IoN'( OF THE ABOVE DI!SCRlII'" POI.ICIU Be CANCeu.ID a&'o~e THE IIXPIRAllON DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING 1N8URIlIOI WlU. eNDeAVOR TO MAIL 20 DAYS \IIIRITTeN NOTIce TO THE CERTlFICATII HOLDER NAMED TO THEe LEFT, aUT 'A1~URE TO 00 SO SHAl.LIMPOSI' NO OBUGATlON O~ UAllIUTY OF ~V KINO UPON THllNSUReR,lTS AGINTS OR REPRESENTATIVes. . AUTHORIZED ..eltResENTATMi"-" . .. --_..... -" ..L . ~"- . ......... , -----."ilj'ACORDCOItPORA1'ioN 1988 Collier COunty Govemm.ant Cftnler Purchasing Oepsrtment.PurcI1aslng Building 3301 Tamiaml Trail east Niaple.. F~ 34112 . I ACORD 25 (2Uu1/ue) QF 03/17/2008 16:23 FAX 2393483994 ,,"IB: 3/17/2008 03:54 F'M CARR AND ASSOC Send..... Fox 10: OIoon a DitIkJn:tlo Ins ~003 16 fA (fDt'a8a., CERTIFICATE OF INSURAMCE The company indicated below C4!rt1ftes that the insurance afforded by the policy or policies nllllbttrQd and dllSc'ribecl b.low is in fore. lIS of the effective date of this certificate. This Certificata of Insurance does not amend. eKtend, or otherwise altor the TaMIlS and Conditions of Insurance coverage contained in any poliCY ntJllbered and deseribed bel arl. CERTIFICATE HOLDER, COLLIER COUNTY PURCHAsiNG OEPT 3301 TAMIAMI TR E "^PLES, FL 34112 I~URED: ENVIIlDNfolEHTALI<<lWING INC 414S 18TH AVE SE NAPLES. FL 34117-9175 I I POll CY NUMBEIl I POLICY f POLICY I LIMnS OF L1ASI Lln I I TYPE OF INSURANCE I & ISSUING CO. IEFF. DATE IEXP. DATE I (*lIMITS AT INCEPTION) I I LIAlIILITY I 77'AC-826130.3001 I 01-27-08 , 01-27-09 I I I [X) Liabil ity and I "^TlONWIOE I I I ~ One Occurrence,....... $ 1,000.000 I I Medl cal Upense I MUTUAL I I I I I [Xl Personal and 1 INSURANCE co. I I I Any One Person/Org '...... S 1,000.000 I I Advertising Injury! I I I I I [X) Mlldi ca 1 Expenses , I I I A~ ONE PERSON ........... $ 5.000 1 I (X) Fire legal I I I I Any One Fire or E>cplasion $ 100.000 I I It obi 1; t,y I I I I I I I I I I Senera 1 Aggregete* ....... , 2.000,000 I I I I I I Prod/Camp Ops Aggregate* . $ 1.000.000 I. I [ J Other LiabIlity I I I I I I I I AUT<Ml8I LE llA8lLITY I I I I I I r ) BUSINESS AUTO I I I I BodIly Injury I I I I I I (Each Person) .......... s I I [ l (),mod I I I I (Each Acol dent) ........ I I I [ ) H1red I I I I Property IlaItJaQo I I ( ) Non-(),med I I I I (Each AccIdent) ... ..... $ I I I I I I Combined Single Limit "'. S I I I I EXCESS llAllI LITY I I I , Each OCcurrence .......... $ I I I I I I Prod/comp Cps/Oiseas. I I ( J Umbrella Form I I I , Aggregate* ............. I I I I I , I I STATUTORY LIMITS I I r ) Workers' I I I BODILY INJURY/ACCIOENT ." S I I Compensation I I I BodIly Injury by 0lseas. I I end I I I tACH EMPLOYEE. ......... s I I [ ] Employers' I I I Sodily Injury by Ofsee.. I I Liability I I I POLICY LIMI'T ........... S I I I Should any of the aOove described poliCIes be cancelled before the DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIDNS/LOCAflONS e.pirat1cn date. the insurance canpeny wl1l ",,;1 30 dllY' VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS wrItten notice to the above nen.d certificate hold.r. STEVE CARNELL CERT HOLDER ALSO LISTED AS ADDITIONAL I HSUREO Effective Oate of Certificate: 01,27'2008 Date Cartificate Is.uo<l: 03'17'2008 Authorized Representat1ve: PHIL DINUNZIO Countersigned at: 2536 HOIITHSIlOOKE PLAZA OR NAPLES. FL 34119 Mar. 18. 2008 9: 12 PM No.4059 l~f~~ ACORD ?:~~i~~ ~;::- ?"'~~:~~-"~1:7::7)~ ~~:i;:r':~:(.~~:.<J~~; .~~~. ,,'.r _ ,\", ". L ~l:..',l..j,_.4 -.,.-.....~.....\.;"';j".<_ r.1..U.'o ,"",j <>0 J. _:!>~ ".,. -'- :'.", _, ' ~ ~~~~"1..:."~.!.C.1:'-~~~~_~ DATE (MPNDDIYY} "AODveER Steve Roe Allstate Insulllnce Agenf;Y 5628 Strand Boulevard, Suite 2 Naples, Florida $4110 Pholle 2~g...593-7333 Fax 239-593-7334 Toll Free 677-744~167a 3/1612006 THIS CERTlF1CAU. IS ISSU&D AS A MATT5R OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFiRS ~ttTS UPON THE CERTIfICATE HOWER. THllS OEftllFlCATE DOES NOT AMI:ND lDCTEND OR IU.'TER THli c;:gVliii~= 1lFF0FtDEP DY THi POI.IOIE8 BEl..OW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY ALLSTATE A COMPANY . IH!I;URED KENNETH PARKER 4145 18TH AVE SE NAPLES FL 34117 COMPANY C COMPANV o THIS IS TO C~TIFYn1AT THE POLICIES OF INBURANCE LISTED 6EI.OVV HAVE BEEN ISSUED'J'O TH SUR NAME:OABOVE POLlCY PERIOD IN . TANDING AtfY "~QUIREMENT. TeIUol bR CONDITlON OF ANY CONTRAcT OR OTHER DOCUMENT VIIITH RE5f'ECT TO WHICH THis CERTIFICATE MAY BE leaUED OR MAY 1'ooAII\I- THE IN&uRANCE A~~OR:DED BY THE POUCIES DESCRIBED HE"fIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE Te.r:c~S, E.XCl.U$IONS ANO CO~OlTIONS OF SUCH POliCIES, UMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEeN REDUCED B PAlO CLAIMS ~ en 'I'T'!Of'INMJIWlCt: """-,,,y_A POlw:YliF~ pQLll:vv:-.o.TmN ,-~ DATElMMlDllIT'r') l>IO.~l~ ""HE AOOII.EOATE p~ouCTS. COMP/OP 1lER.6QNAl & ADV INJUR EACH OOCufl.RENCEl FIR€ DAA1"GE I/<foy~. ~o IAITyCllll~llI'l) 388076572711 3116/1Ja 3118/09 COMBINED SINGLE L.,rr 2005 DR3500 VIN-22166 eoCllL'r'IN,lUR'T' $500.000 I $500,000 jP"'pIIrsOOfPOIlICddlantl GEl'aw.llQll,lfY ;0; CQI,WI!RClALGEf\lE~L ,un- ClAIMS MACE DOOOuI'l ~~$.CO~~TO~S '"'' ALLSTATE AUTOMOBILE LlA8Il1TY AHf,wTO ALL OWNED ...1IT0$ X SCHEDULED ...UT05 HlREOAlITOS NOO.QWNEO AUTO!;l PROPERlY r:wu.G1: $500,000 UEOrCAL JlAYWiNT $5,000 GARACiEUABlLITY "NYAUTO AUTQONLY.EA OTHER THAT AUTO ',~'""E;: --1~~~~ EAt;HACCClENT AIJGREGl.TE EACH OCCURRENCE A f1<;ATI: IN" l,..fl!'rORY EL EACH ACCIDENT WORKER:!; C;OIlPI!N&.ArlOl'l AND EMPLOYI!Il.SLIA8LITY TMEPRCIl"RIETORI PARTNERSlEX'CCUTIV EOFFICE~ARI;: OTllER ElDlSEAS!;.POLICY ,,"- ~~ QIiEA5E - EA DI!KRrP"flOH OF oPe~T10N9ILOCAnoN8IVEHlCLUI5PE(;1A1.ITEMI COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT IS LISTED AS 80T~ A CERTIFICATE ~OLDER AND AN ADDITIONAL INSURED FOR THIS POLICY. r~~"-t'-,q"'J~~'-:\~1T~"'~~' ", ~,-':-. '-.- ~.'-~~~""""'I;p~"(:~~1.:'\:'flq~ ~""~_... ~""~ . ~J---'L....... ,,'-....,_~~~ ~ ,..J_-, ""'" _-' :~:;::;,:::~"""'~~...... ~_'"-..",j-~- ~""""i",""'X"",,,,,,_~'c.I~:;j COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMi:NT 3301 E TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34112 ATTN: BRENDA BRIL~ART SHOULD ANY OF TI.1I5 ABove DEliCRIBIiilD POUCIES BE CANlJELLED BEFORi Itll::: EXPlAJ,T10N DAn;: THeftEOl", THE ISSU~O COMf'o\NT Wll.L GNDEAVOR TO MAl 3Q DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THIi ~I"IOA."I! tfOLDEIt. NHl'ED TO THI! LEFT Bur FAiLURE TO MAll5UCH A Ncmc:1i SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY Of "NY KIND UPON tHE COMPANY, rrs AGENTS OR REPftESENTATJYES, AUI~D"'EI'fI&EllTA1I\IE 16A6 r1 MEMORANDUM Date: February 21, 2008 To: Brenda Brilhart, Purchasing Agent Purchasing Department From: Ann Jennejohn, Sr. Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Contract #08-4197: "Nuisance Abatement Services" Contractor: Ecosystems Technology Attached please find the original contract document, as referenced above, (Agenda Item #16A6) approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. The Minutes & Records Department has also retained an original copy which will be kept as part of the Board's permanent record. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-7240. Thank you. Attachments 16A6 A G RE E MEN T 08.4197 for Nuisance Abatement Services THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this 26th day of February, 2008, by and between Ecosystem Technologies, Inc., authorized to do business in the State of Florida, whose business address is 2223 McGregor Boulevard, Fort Myers, Florida 33901, hereinafter called the "Contractor" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Collier County, Naples, hereinafter called the "County": WITNESSETH: 1. COMMENCEMENT. The contract shall be for a one (1) year period, commencing on February 26, 2008 and terminating on February 25, 2009. The County may, at its discretion and with the consent of the Contractor, renew the Agreement under all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement for three (3) additional one (1) year periods. The County shall give the Contractor written notice of the County's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior to the end of the Agreement term then in effect. 2. STATEMENT OF WORK. The Contractor shall provide lawn services, as Primary awardee, and invasive plant removal and additional services, as Secondary awardee, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Bid #08-4197 and the Contractor's proposal referred to herein and made an integral part of this agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties and any modifications to this Agreement shall be mutually agreed upon in writing by the Contractor and the County Project Manager or his designee, in compliance with the County Purchasing Policy and Administrative Procedures in effect at the time such services are authorized. 3. COMPENSATION. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Agreement the aggregate of the units actually ordered and furnished at the unit price. Any county agency may purchase products and services under this contract, provided sufficient funds are included in their budget(s). Payment will be made upon receipt of a proper invoice and upon approval by the Project Manager or his designee, and in compliance with Section 218.70, Fla. Stats., otherwise known as the "Florida Prompt Payment Act". Page 1 01'6 16A6 4. NOTICES. All notices from the County to the Contractor shall be deemed duly served if mailed or faxed to the Contractor at the following Address: Ecosystem Technologies, Inc. 2223 McGregor Boulevard Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Attention: Jim Walsh, Vice President Telephone: 239.337-5310 Facsimile: 239-337.4494 All Notices from the Contractor to the County shall be deemed duly served if mailed or faxed to the County to: Collier County Government Center Purchasing Department. Purchasing Building 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, Florida 34112 Attention: Steve Carnell, Purchasing/GS Director Telephone: 239-252-8371 Facsimile: 239.252.6584 The Contractor and the County may change the above mailing address at any time upon giving the other party written notification. All notices under this Agreement must be in writing. 5. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating a partnership between the County and the Contractor or to constitute the Contractor as an agent of the County. 6. PERMITS: LICENSES: TAXES. In compliance with Section 218.80, F.S., all permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be obtained by the Contractor. Payment for all such permits issued by the County shall be processed internally by the County. All non-County permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be procured and paid for by the Contractor. The Contractor shall also be solely responsible for payment of any and all taxes levied on the Contractor. In addition, the Contractor shall comply with all rules, regulations and laws of Collier County, the State of Florida, or the U, S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. The Contractor agrees to comply with all laws governing the responsibility of an employer with respect to persons employed by the Contractor. 7. NO IMPROPER USE. The Contractor will not use, nor suffer or permit any person to use in any manner whatsoever, county facilities for any improper, immoral or offensive purpose, or for any purpose in violation of any federal, state, county or municipal ordinance, rule, order or regulation, or of any governmental rule or regulation now in Page 2 of6 16A6 effect or hereafter enacted or adopted. In the event of such violation by the Contractor or if the County or its authorized representative shall deem any conduct on the part of the Contractor to be objectionable or improper, the County shall have the right to suspend the contract of the Contractor. Should the Contractor fail to correct any such violation, conduct, or practice to the satisfaction of the County within twenty-four (24) hours after receiving notice of such violation, conduct, or practice, such suspension to continue until the violation is cured. The Contractor further agrees not to commence operation during the suspension period until the violation has been corrected to the satisfaction of the County. 8. TERMINATION. Should the Contractor be found to have failed to perform his services in a manner satisfactory to the County as per this Agreement, the County may terminate said agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a thirty (30) day written notice. The County shall be sole judge of non-performance. 9. NO DISCRIMINATION. The Contractor agrees that there shall be no discrimination as to race, sex, color, creed or national origin. 10. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall provide insurance as follows: A. Commercial General Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability, This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent Contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. B. Business Auto Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $500,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include: Owned Vehicles, Hired and Non-Owned Vehicles and Employee Non-Ownership. C. Workers' Compensation: Insurance covering all employees meeting Statutory Limits in compliance with the applicable state and federal laws. The coverage must include Employers' Liability with a minimum limit of $500,000 for each accident. Special Requirements: Collier County shall be listed as the Certificate Holder and included as an Additional Insured on the Comprehensive General Liability Policy. Current, valid insurance policies meeting the requirement herein identified shall be maintained by Contractor during the duration of this Agreement. Renewal certificates shall be sent to the County thirty (30) days prior to any expiration date. There shall be a thirty (30) day notification to the County in the event of cancellation or modification of any stipulated insurance coverage. Page 3 01'6 16A6~~ Contractor shall insure that all subContractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. 11. INDEMNIFICATION. To the maximum extent permitted by Florida law, the Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless Collier County, its officers and employees from any and all liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and paralegals' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Contractor or anyone employed or utilized by the Contractor in the performance of this Agreement. This indemnification obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or reduce any other rights or remedies which otherwise may be available to an indemnified party or person described in this paragraph. This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of Collier County. 12. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of the County by the Code Enforcement Department. 13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Contractor represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder. Contractor further represents that no persons having any such interest shall be employed to perform those services. 14. COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS CONTRACT. This Contract consists of the attached component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the contract as if herein set out verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, Insurance Certificate, Bid #08-4197 Specifi- cationsjScope of Services and Addenda. 15. SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties herein that this agreement is subject to appropriation by the Board of County Commissioners. 16. PROHIBITION OF GIFTS TO COUNTY EMPLOYEES. No organization or individual shall offer or give, either directly or indirectly, any favor, gift, loan, fee, service or other item of value to any County employee, as set forth in Chapter 112, Part III, Florida Statutes, Collier County Ethics Ordinance No. 2004-05, and County Administrative Procedure 5311, Violation of this provision may result in one or more of the following consequences: a. Prohibition by the individual, firm, andj or any employee of the firm from contact with County staff for a specified period of time; b. Prohibition by the individual andj or firm from doing business with the County for a specified period of time, including but not limited to: submitting bids, RFP, andj or quotes; and, c. immediate termination of any contract held by the individual andj or firm for cause. Page 4 of6 16A6 17. IMMIGRATION LAW COMPLIANCE. By executing and entering into this agreement, the Contractor is formally acknowledging without exception or stipulation that it is fully responsible for complying with the provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 U.s.e. 1324, et seq. and regulations relating thereto, as either may be amended. Failure by the Contractor to comply with the laws referenced herein shall constitute a breach of this agreement and the County shall have the discretion to unilaterally terminate this agreement immediately. 18. VENUE. Any suit or action brought by either party to this Agreement against the other party relating to or arising out of this Agreement must be brought in the appropriate federal or state courts in Collier County, Florida, which courts have sole and exclusive jurisdiction on all such matters. 19. OFFER EXTENDED TO OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. Collier County encourages and agrees to the successful proposer extending the pricing, terms and conditions of this solicitation or resultant contract to other governmental entities at the discretion of the successful proposer. 20. AGREEMENT TERMS. If any portion of this Agreement is held to be void, invalid, or otherwise unenforceable, in whole or in part, the remaining portion of this Agreement shall remain in effect. 21. ADDITIONAL ITEMS/SERVICES. Additional items andj or services may be added to this contract upon satisfactory negotiation of price by the Contract Manager and Contactor. Page 5 01'6 16,16 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the County, have each, respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above written. .' ,;:,"oI-j1'") '. -. '1r'l) ATTEST:' ~> Dwi t K Brock~\=let . of Courts BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COU,Y, FLORIDA . By: J'i'1t By: Dated(:;J Attnt~~ ,lqMtur-e 00 1. Tom Henning, Chairman /1 I'll ',' '11\ W3{" By: \;, ~\o b'2c' n t( tTypejprint tness namet ~OQ'-Jl R~ Second Witness (\ . .~...Jo...l.l\~ M..::r of'\(.~ I So' ) Typed signature and title P~.l: l~,J- C h..lI.J{'l~ M _ R u...mpL--. tTypejprint witness namet Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: A"ibS~.:' Print Name Page 6 of6 From: (941)747.9946 To: 1239.337-4494 Page: 2/2 Date 3/10/200811 :03:37 AM 16A6 ACORD". CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 10002752 I DATE lU.MIDOIYYVy/ 3/1012008 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Risk Concepts Corporation ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE 410 43rd Street West Suite N HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR Bradenton, Fl 34209 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POliCIES BELOW. Phone: 1-877-746-2209 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURED Insurer A: Southern Eagle Insurance Co. Administrative Concepts Corp Reinsurer B: L10yds of London AA.1122000 406 43rd street West Reinsurer C: Aspen Reinsurance AA.1120337 Bradenton, FL 34209 Reinsurer 0: Max Re Bennuda AA.3190829 , R~insur~r E: Odyssey Re 23680 COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TOTHE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REOUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERT!FICATE !\(A.Y BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDEO BYTHE POLlC!ES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND COODIT10NS OF SUCH POLICIES, AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. iNSR '-[jO"l~. '~'EN.: ~RAO--M"~'''E~R''~C''':~GENERA'' . """8'" ","T',,"IU ___'..u" '~;~l~.~~~~.mu n...... '?OlitYJf~~1E' 'Pg~~~~~~~N' ~~~"~.~.~~~.~~~~~.---~;~;;~~--- ..muuuuu mum_o" ~"'....... LL L. 'o;..)}.il;GE'f1:Yt.1t::;\i-:E!:Y' ...... 'n'" , ~ J GAIM3 .1ADE 0 CCCUR _~~;~~~~:~~,~~:o~:~~~~;__: m. mum".n , , I ~ : : I .----' ~n.AGGRF.~f..I.IMIT "'\p~~ pm ! ! Pt-Jl.ICY I I ~.E~~ I ! I. IV; : AUTOMoellE lIAellllY c~ !..___j ANy A'.;f':; : i I\ll. ,l',\itlF:-r:l,l\UT0S ~ L...J SCHEOlXILEDi,UTQS ~_.uJ ~IRED,~UTOS fum] :.JOf'J.(:".V'lNED ,\UTO$ ~ I PERSON!'':' & AU,/INJURY , :~~!,f,1. t..G,::'R"GI'.TE ~W;DIl':--;2~,- '.;l!'.;P/l"}p ~.G(; ~ "--- C:'I,lalNEa S IHGLE L IMff (Eo 8ccider~f ,-' : 30GIL'( II': _;~R ,{ $ L~:~~~:~.~~~~um.... n........... I ['OC':L'r IN,~dRY ("e.-gccic1i>:1lJ s ::; ! GARAGE LlABILlTY c-o H ,'.Ny AL'TO i ! t:XCESSlUMBRELLA L1ABlUTY c-, D ~ CK.l-.l;::< ClAIMSMACE PR0;JERT" D/\MAGE (P9,a.::cirl&rt11 --~- --.-" ",,-----" i\U"O ON~'(. E~ACCID8-.jT , A n:;)f:'f)IKl"I8I.E ~ ~ETf.NTION $ WORKERS COMPENSA nO'N AND EMPLOYERS'l.,1A8ILlTY Ar-..'f :'>ROf"-RIETOR:PARTN~RIEXECUTIVE O",i':CF.R.'MDV:8fh: f.)(.CI.l;OI?D? lIy"s,dasr-.l:h(lull'ii'-f SPECIAL PRO\JIG!ONS be:c.... OTHER Workers Compensation Excess Coverage -T-- I ::J1'"lER TI--:A.N AI,:,) l~NL 'f; FA".CC S ~.<:;::JRRF.I'';C,E': "'.GC;,Rf.C,"'.Tr: AGG S , , f---.- e----- , :} :} Be DE x I \!\,f:; S'i A.rLJ'_I"""I~JRH" 1/112008 1/112009 .._._LLQR:.-'.J.MlT.S.L ___u....___u___m..m.___n ! r.~c~:.E!.:~~.J.~"~_lg.E!'.:!...m_m_. L.LQQQ.9.QQ...mu_..- I E.LDISEr...3E"E'AEMPL,-:)YE ~ 1,000000 I 1 [': L. OISEA.ClE. POLICY UMIT ~ 1,000,000 ease note that Southern Eagle Insurance Company has relnsurea its labllties In excess a , under t e po ICles aT insurance listed above with underwritern listed A. or better at the time of placement of such rensurance. Such reinsurance are subject to their own terms, conditions and limits. This is for informational purposes and nothing herein shall create any right undersuchreinsurances. WC0272682.00 oeSCRlPTION Of" OP~TIONS! lOCA110NS IVEHlCLES' EXCll)SIONS ADDEO BY ENOORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS Coverage is extended to the leased employees of alternate employer (Florida Operations Only): Ecosystem Technologies Inc Effective: 7/22/2002 021900 DISCLAIMER: This Certificate of Insurance does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s), authorlzed representative or producer, and the certificate holder, nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the po~cies listed thereon. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCEllATION Collier County Government steve Carnell, Purchasing/GS Director 3301 E Tamiarni Trail Naples, FL 34112 SHOlA..O ANY OF THEABOVE DESCRIBED POL.ICIES BE CIl.NCELLED BEFORE THE EXPfRA TlON DATE 1l-lEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MIl.Il. ~ DAYS WRITIEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOlDER NAMED TO THE l.EFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON mE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR REPRBSENTA TlVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTA 11ve ,.- Fax# (941) 252,6584 \ ",,,,,,_.')'.J.. ... l!IJ-.... @ACORDCORPORATlON 1988 ACORD 25 (2001/08) This fax was sent with GFl FAXmaker fax server. For more information. visit: http://v{vwv.gfi,com From:ALAN WILLIAMS @ ASSOCIATES 239418 1164 03/10/2008 15:20 #647 P.OOI/001 A CORa. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE PRODUCER (239)418-1100 FAX (239)418-1164 Alan Williams & Associates Inc. #1 13700-1 Ben C. Pratt/ Six Mile Cypress Pkwy Ft.Myers, FL 33912 INSURED Ecosystem Technologies Inc. 2223 McGregor Blvd Fort Myers, FL 33901 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF 0 ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFiCATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE !NSURERA Ohio ~sualty Group INSURER B: INSURER C' INSURER D: INSURER E: NAIC# 24074 cnuERA"c~ THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHE~ DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. '!'I!!l ~!!.'!:! PQUCY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION ---- TYPE OF !NSURANCE POUCY NUMBER LIMITS ~ENERAL LIABILITY BK052666540 10/16/2007 10/16/2008 EACH OCCURRENCE , l,OOO.OOU X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY DAMAGE TO RENTED ---,- , 100,00r I CLAIMS MADE [K] OCCUR MEa EXP (Anyone person) , 10 , oor A ~ Contractual Liab. PERSONAL 8. ADV INJURY , l,OOO,OOr -. t- GENERAL AGGREGATE , 2,000,00( h.t AGG~nE LIMIT APnS PER PROOUCTS - COMPfOP AGG , 2 ooo,oor POlICY ~~8r LOC I--A~TO"OBILE lIA81LITY BAW52666540 10/16/2007 10/16/2008 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT ~ ANYAUTO (Eaaccident) , 1,000 oor I~ AlL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY {per person) , A '- SCHEDULED AUTOS - '- HIRED AUTOS BQDll Y INJURY (Peracadanl) , ~ NON-OWNED AUTOS '- PROPERTY DAMAGE , (Per accident) RRAGE UAB'UTY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT , /lj4Y AUTO OTHER THAN EAACC , AUTO ONLY AGG , =.=JESS/UMBREllA llAfUUTY EACH OCCURRENCE , OCCUR 0 CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE , , - ~ DEDUCTIBLE f----- , RE"'[ENTION , , WORKERS COMPENSATION AND Ur~C5;rf.I\l.~1 IOJ~- QR', EMPLOYERS' UA81LITY E-L EACH ACCIDENT , AIN PROPRIETORlf'ARTNERfEXECUTIVE OFFtCERlMCMBER EXCLUDED? E.l DISEASE - EA EMPlOYE $ ~~~I~S~W~J:~orNS below EL DfSEASE. POLICY LIMIT , jjTHER . Property 8. BK052666540 10/16/2007 10/16/2008 See policy schedule onmerclal A nland Marine $250,000 Value Rented/Leased $500 Deductible ~RIPT1ON OF OPERATIONS I lOCATIONS 1 VEHICLES I ~CLUSIONS ADDEO 8Y ENDORSEMENl' I SPECIAL. PROVISIONS o lier County is included as ad itional insured with respect to General liability. C H R C SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRAT10N DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING III/SURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL ~ DAYS WRITTEN NOT1CE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAll SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY Collier County Government 3301 E Tam;ami Trail Naples, Fl 34112 Jeff Williams ACORD 25 (2001108) FAX: (239)252-6584 ~ :; SfctJ e- Co..'y r\..t (I w=~~"',1l:-. -.\, ._(, ,-' ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING ~~Lor d TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO '3 -3 --o~ THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original do\:umcnts should be hand delivered to the Board Office, The completed routing slip and 'gi~ A documents are to be forwarded to the Board Otlice only after the B(i~~~i~a~os~;~ item.) .J. 0 ? Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or infonnation needed. If the document is already complete with the exceotion ufthe Chainnan's sie:oature, draw a line throue:h routillo lines # 1 through #4, comolete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routinf! order) I. Sue Filson BCC 2. Judy Puig CDES Admin CAf ;;-;)(".08' 3. Michelle Arnold Code Enforcement rhlj 02.-,,- ot 4. 5. 6. PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMA nON (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the BeC has acted to approve the item) Name of Primary Staff Marlene Stewart Phone Number 252-2496 Contact Agenda Date Item was d.J~v/O'B' Agenda Item Number 16A'7 Approved bv the BCC Type of Document Release & Satisfaction of Lien Number of Original 65 Attached Documents Attached I. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a TO riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (AIl documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fuIly executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCe approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a Iicable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the Bec office within 24 hours of BCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on -.:I ,0 (enter date) and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The . Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable. Yes (Initial) N/A (Not A licable) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. @f IJ J If- 0f cat I: Forms/ County Forms/ Bee Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16A? Recommendation to approve the Release and Satisfaction of Code Enforcement Liens for payments received OBJECTIVE: To approve execution and recording of the Release and Satisfaction of the listed Liens, acknowledging compliance and recovery of fines and fees related to prosecution of Code Enforcement matters CONSIDERATIONS: Reference Owner of Record Folio Lien Amount CEB 2006-45 Jesus & Laura Perez 00082961963 $1,200.00 OSM 2006010158 Jesus & Laura Perez 00075200000 $141.09 OSM 2006030904 Armando Yzaguirre 63865240000 $124.34 OSM 2006010540 Francis, Paul & Christopher Lombard 62710200002 $520.00 OSM 2005100286 David Esquivel 66881480003 $5,787.50 OSM 2004110262 Jason Mardis 36514360006 $6,601.25 OSM 2003030309 Amerada Hess Corp. 35640720003 $179.41 OSM 2005070501 Jeffrey & Keith Basik 61510000021 $231.83 OSM 2006110321 Courthouse Shadows Consolidated 00126880007 $659.37 Holdings, Inc. OSM-SO 145163 Randall Latona N/A $550.00 & 145164 OSM 2006100007 Patricia Dolan 00769680004 $197.99 OSM 2006070400 Ted Barrett, Est. 52393600000 $132.45 OSM 2005070279 Roberto Conti & Gerarda Daidone 55052640007 $156.90 OSM 2006100318 John Emery 81271201301 $384.57 OSM 2006020911 Jeremiah Doran & Hasan Karagoz 63864160000 $151.54 OSM 2006020362 Marco Orbegoso 26630080005 $681.18 OSM 2005110778 Jesus Ayala 00127563307 $194.47 OSM 2005120347 Jean R., Rosalee Darce & Roger 71271920003 $256.06 Anl!ervil OSM 2005120346 Jean R., Rosalee Darce & Roger 71271920003 $175.52 Angervil Reference Owner of Record Folio Lien Amount OSM 2005060680 Robin Okolski 52399800008 $245.57 OSM 2006050116 Diane Muenze Gonzalez 68095560005 $187.72 OSM 2006070623 Josefina Mnnoz 00081120006 $2,000.00 OSM 2005120724 John C. & Sherri L. Morrison 24831??oo06 $170.97 OSM 2005040566 Edward & Rnth Dibene 65221360001 $132.79 OSM 2006050930 Charles & Donna Aylsworth 68047280003 $1,127.97 OSM 2005050079 Betty Shaffer, Tr. 67494560005 $163.47 OSM 2005051029 Ricbard Korman 53350040000 $163.47 OSM 2005051026 Richard Korman 53350040000 $163.47 OSM 2004040835 Miguel & Daima Fernandez 35775720004 $160.03 OSM 2005110434 Melquiades R. Buckow 38456440008 $210.10 OSM 2005060116 Carlos Perez & Saily Fuentes 62266200006 $157.14 OSM 2005080097 Ginger Gandy 35881360002 $1,868.97 OSM 2005040777 Dorene Clark 38332920008 $195.30 OSM 2006040775 Ricardo Ramirez & Sonia Garcia 60481080003 $1,948.73 OSM 2007030825 Wayne C. Womack 52700960003 $247.42 OSM 2006050747 Adan Hernandez 30683440002 $130.12 OSM 2006020827 Cresencio Martinez 60784200001 $170.66 OSM 2006020828 Cresencio Martinez 60784200001 $177.23 OSM 2005100215 Johnnie McSwain Thomas Est. 66930360003 $179.19 OSM 2005040921 Ashby & Denise Gilkenson 38336640009 $27,500.00 OSM 2005040747 Dave Mobley, Est. 77213480000 $115.19 OSM 2006120370 Melquiades Segura & Maria Segura 63856040002 $400.00 OSM- CO Anthony Cesa, Beverly & Joseph Frato 62570840000 $118.42 2005010252 OSM 2005080950 John & Joan Coffman 68045200001 $158.00 OSM 2006060894 Shirley Hnfford 63401960003 $129.58 16A? Reference Owner of Record Folio Lien Amount OSM - SO 145152 Juan Acevedo N/A $300.00 OSM 2006020265 Delius Adeka 62047120101 $6,339.28 OSM - CO Charles Aylsworth 62570840000 $606.95 2005020630 OSM 2005010536 Martin & Louisiana Mena 69654640006 $110.10 OSM 2004128483 Manuel Lamoglia 36312240001 $2,148.37 OSM 2006040689 Ricardo & Irma Montes 25577800721 $141.09 OSM 2006050687 Noe & Ivon Munoz 62150760005 $126.22 OSM 2005020112 Frank Lagonigro 62768200009 $140.05 OSM 2006070379 Jnlia Gomez 56405040004 $137.30 OSM 2006050760 Esteban & Rita Martinez 30680080009 $130.12 OSM 2006040832 Francis P. Lord 61780280008 $127.80 OSM - SO 152122 Patricia K. Sullivan N/A $50.00 OSM 2005040764 BFS Retail & Commercial Operation, 7441072003 $19,435.12 LLC OSM 2005110329 Tereso Bautista & Emiliana Lopes 38045920007 $500.00 Vasquez OSM-S0151737 Janet M. Clark N/A $250.00 OSM-S0152401 Edward J. Bauman N/A $50.00 OSM-SO 151709 Phyllis A. Emens N/A $250.00 OSM - SO 152418 Wilbert M. Beacham N/A $50.00 OSM 2006060894 Shirley Hufford 63401960003 $129.58 OSM 2005080446 Brenda Soto 52399800008 $350.00 TOTAL 87,918.96 16A 16A? FISCAL IMPACT: The only expense incurred by the County is the cost of recording the Releases and Satisfactions, which is to be approximately $10.00 per release, totaling $650.00. Funds are budgeted and available in the current fiscal year in the Code Enforcement budget. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: This request will have no impact on the County's Growth Management Plan. LEGAL CONSIDERATION: This request has been reviewed for legal sufficiency and has no outstanding legal considerations. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Release and Satisfaction of Code Enforcement Liens. PREPARED BY: Marlene Stewart, Administrative Secretary - Code Enforcement This instrument prepared by: Jeff E. Wright Assistant County Attorney 2BOO N, Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135125 OR: 4335 PG: 0419 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 1 03/04/2008 at 09:13AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK REC m 10,00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH !LOOR BIT 8406 16A? RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Code Enforcement Board dated February 28, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on March 7, 2007, in O.R. Book 4193, Pages 2086-87, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Jesus and Laura Perez, has been discharged in full: Jesus and Laura Perez 2942 Immokalee Drive Immokalee, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 00082961963 $1 ,200 CEB Case No. 2006-45 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Jesus and Laura Perez, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this d~~h daYOf~~U4rj ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ::I12; ,CHA MAN By: ~ ~ Q(.. AtttIt II a QM~tY.Clerk 1111ft1turt 0111. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Jeff E. Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135126 OR: 4335 PG: 0420 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:13AM OWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC FBi 10.00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16A? RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated August 10, 2006 a certified copy of which was recorded on, August 11, 2006 in O.R. Book 4087, Page 2469, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Jesus and Laura Perez, has been discharged in full. Jesus and Laura Perez 2942 lmmokalee Drive Immokalee, FI Folio No. Cost: OSM No: 00075200000 $141.09 2006010158 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Jesus and Laura Perez, and consents to this lien being di scharged of record. Dated this df,1h day of J..t.brua,..~ ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY:~'I't~C:kL. By: ,~onl' . ,CHAI Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Jeff right Assi t County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Jeff E, Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135127 OR: 4335 PG: 0421 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:13AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK REC FBE 10,00 cams 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROmCB 4TH FLOOR BIT 8406 16A? RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated July 7, 2006 a certified copy of which was recorded on July 21, 2006, in O.R. Book 4076, Page 0656, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Armando Yzaguirre, has been discharged in full. Armando Yzaguirre 211 New Market Road E. Naples, FL Folio No. Cost: OSM No: 63865240000 $124.34 2006030904 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Armando Yzaguirre, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this J~tJ, day of ~h(LACl(~ ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER OUNTY, ORillA By: j) 11 L{ ~t" vOl:... ",' ,D uty Clerk Attest IS to 11 , slQft1t.... 0lI1. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: By: ~ Jeff . right Assist t County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Jeff E. Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135128 OR: 4335 PG: 0422 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2008 at 09:13AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK REC m 10.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICB ITH FLOOR BXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated August 22, 2006 a certified copy of which was recorded on September 6, 2006, in OR Book 4101, Page 0178, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Francis, Paul, and Christopher Lombard, has been discharged in full. Francis, Paul, and Christopher Lombard 72591" Ave N. Folio No. Cost: OSM No: 62710200002 $520.00 2006010540 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Francis, Paul, and Christopher Lombard, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this rll.i-h day of J~(Uo.lt ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA , CHAIR N By; ~ll ^t!~O.L. By: - M...rt IS to ,~t~ Clerk Itguwrt _1 ~ Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~. -vt:: - Jef . right Assis nt County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Jeff E. Wright Assistant County Auorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135129 OR: 4335 PG: 0423 *** RECORDED in O!!ICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, !L 03/01/2008 at 09:13AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK REC !BE 10,00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROmCE ITH FLOOR EXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated July 21,2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 2, 2006, in O.R. Book 4081, Page 2674, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by David Esquivel, has been discharged in full. David Esquivel 301 S. 6th Street Immokalee, Fl 34143 Folio No. Cost: OSM No: 66881480003 $5,787.50 2005100286 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by David Esquivel, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ~ ~ +h day of F.t.bruQ,('1 ,2008. A TrEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ::LL~:ct: . , CHAIR~ By:llu.u. ~.L ~:Attest.S , ytlerk S1Q11.t..... 001. Approved as. to form and legal sufficiency: i&E: Jeff right Assist t County Attorney This instrument prepared by: JeffE. Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135130 OR: 4335 PG: 0424 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:13AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC m 10.00 cams 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTKRomCB 4TH FLOOR BIT 8406 16A? RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated February 28, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 19, 2005, in O.R. Book 3777, Page 4127, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Jason Mardis, has been discharged in full. Jason Mardi s 4225 31st Place S.W. Naples, FL Folio No. Cost: OSM No; 36514360006 $6,601.25 2004110262 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Jason Mardis, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ;216-/Jl day of (.UJfUa.'t.( ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COllIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Atust IS to . f atgqttn eM! h (. uiY Clerk By: , CHAIRM Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Jeff right Assi nt County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Jeff E. Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135131 OR: 4335 PG: 0425 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, lL 03/04/2008 at 09:13AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC m 10.00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTERomCE 4TH !LOOR EIT 8406 16P? RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated July 6, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 10,2007, in O.R. Book 4268, Pagers) 3962 and 3963, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Amerada Hess Corp., has been discharged in full. Amerada Hess Corp. 11655 Collier Blvd Naples, Fl Folio No: Cost: OSM No: 35640720003 $179.41 2003-030309 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Amerada Hess Corp, and consents to this lien being di scharged of record. Dated this J ~#. day of P.u,ruary ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO TY, FL RillA By: ~ ~(. D-l.JiO.Lr By: ltun " to ~ tl\Clerk 110Rltllrt on!- Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: , CHAIRM Jeff . Assis . right t County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Jeff E. Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135132 OR: 4335 PG: 0426 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:13AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK REC m 10,00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16A? RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated February 17, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on February 24, 2006, in O.R. Book 3988, Page 1002, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Jeffrey and Keith Basik, has been discharged in full. Jeffrey and Keith Basik 195 Basi k Dri ve Naples, FL Folio No. Cost: OSMNo: 61510000021 $231.83 2005070501 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Jeffrey and Keith Basik, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ;)lJo/il day of P'.Jlm.u.l.ry ,2008. By: 1) Jj.J 1 ~D.(. Attest as CII4 ~Clerk 119l'lture 0111- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIERYJNTY, F ORillA By: ,:}fJt- A TIEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: right t County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Jeff E, Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive. Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135133 OR: 4335 PG: 0427 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:13AM D~IGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC FBB 10,00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated, July 6, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 10,2007, in O.R. Book 4268, Pagers) 3970, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Courthouse Shadows Consolidated Holdings, Inc, has been discharged in full. Courthouse Shadows Consolidated Holdings, Inc. 414 Booker Blvd Immokalee, FL Folio No. Cost: OSM No: 00126880007 $659.37 2006-110321 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Courthouse Shadows Consolidated Holdings, Inc, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this c)l(p#1 day of F..uJru,fAry ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIERYUNTY, ORIDA. By: .:JrJt BY:~~S~~=~t. Itllllltln ~l ~ ,CHAIR V\N Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: JeffE. Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135134 OR: 4335 PG: 0428 *** RECOROED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:13AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLBRK REC m 10,00 cams 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated August 5, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 9, 2005, in O.R. Book 3863, Page 2943, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Randall Latona, has been discharged in full. Randall Latona Grills of Naples Naples, FL Folio No. Cost: SO No: N/A $550.00 145163 and 145164 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Randall Latona, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this a(;-Ill day of f':......hru",'Y , 2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER 7NTY, ORillA By: ,J<fJt- By:J)UH ~~().t. Attest IS Cl\t )N:lerk 'S19'11tlltt Oftl' , CHAIRM Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Jeff E. Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34] 04 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135137 OR: 4335 PG: 0431 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:18AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CL8RK RBC PEE 10,00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBRO/FICB 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16A? RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated, July 6,2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 10,2007, in OR Book 4268, Page(s) 3972 and 3973, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Patricia Dolan, has been discharged in full. Patricia Dolan 980 Auto Ranch Road #5 Naples, Fl Folio No. Cost: OSM No: 00769680004 $197.99 2006-100007 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Patricia Dolan, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this Jfo-/ll day of tU('UfM1 ,2008. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Cieri< COLLT' RIDA By: (\ 1'1J. Lo../ J 6AL~ uO.L. By: V--- Att:.t IS ~y'-:lerk S lonaturt 011 J . Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Jeff E. Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135138 OR: 4335 PG: 0432 *** RBCOROBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/200B at 09:18AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC FBB COPIBS 10.00 \.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BIT 8406 16 h ( RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated September 15, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on September 27, 2006, in O.R. Book 4112, Page 2547, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Ted Barrett, Est., has been discharged in full. Ted Barrett, Est. 112 W. Pago Pago Drive Naples, Fl Folio No. Cost: OSM No: 52393600000 $132.45 2006070400 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Ted Barrett, Est., and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this /)(p-lh day of Fibru.b.,Y ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO TY, FLORIDA By: j)..kU.A_ 1t~..t.O~.' Attest IS to t) Clerk S lllfl.tur. onl . By: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Jeff E. Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135139 OR: 4335 PG: 0433 *** RBCORDBD in OPPICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, PL 03/04/2008 at 09:18AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC m 10,00 cams 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROmCB 4TH PLOOR BIT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated September 2, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on September 19, 2005, in O.R. Book 3892, Page 1596, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Roberto Conti and Gerarda Daidone, has been discharged in full. Roberto Conti and Gerarda Daidone 437 Forest Hills Blvd Naples, FL Folio No. Cost: OSM No: 55052640007 $156.90 2005070279 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Roberto Conti and Gerarda Daidone, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this J(,o/h day of kiJJ fU.MY ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: 11.J111 ~lI~I"'o.( Attest " Ch. t~Clerk .igMtw't <MIl- By: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: . This instrument prepared by: Jeff E. Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135140 OR: 4335 PG: 0434 *** RECORDED in O!!ICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, !L 03/04/1008 at 09:18AK DKIGHT E, 8ROCK, CLERK REC!BE 10,00 cams 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THB BOARD INTERO!!ICE 4TH !LOOR BIT 8406 16A? RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated, July 6,2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 10,2007, in O.R. Book 4268, Pagers) 3966 and 3967, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by John Emery, has been discharged in full. John Emery 2815 Becca Avenue Naples, FL Folio No. Cost: OSM No: 81271201301 $384.57 2006-100318 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by John Emery, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this J~#I day of Fwru.fu'I ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER C NTY, ORillA By: llu..u 2f 17~'~{)_( . AtttJt IS eM ' y perk 11gltltlll"t 011]' By: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~. -~t Jeff right ~ - Assistant County Attorney This instrument prepared by: JetT E. Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 30 I Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135141 OR: 4335 PG: 0435 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:18AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC m 10,00 COPIBS 1,00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SA TISF ACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated, August 10, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on August II, 2006 in O.R. Book 4087, Page 2482, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Jeremiah Doran and Hasan Karagoz, has been discharged in full. Jeremiah Doran and Hasan Karagoz 806 Charlotte Street Immokalee, FL Folio No. Cost: OSM No: 63864160000 $151.54 2006020911 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Jeremiah Doran and Hasan Karagoz, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ~lIlh day of r.J.bf"u."'Y ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: CD J J J ^L,~(J.(. By: MttIt .,- to ~l_t~ Clerk S1gMtln 0111' ,CHA Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~~ 3r Jeff . right Assis nt County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Jeff E, Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135142 OR: 4335 PG: 0436 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/04/1008 at 09:18AM DWIGHT E, EROCK, CLERK RBC m 10,00 COPIRS 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THB BOARD INTEROmCB 4TH PLOOR BXT 8406 16A? RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated, July 20,2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 10,2007, in O.R. Book 4268, Page(s) 3977 and 3978 , of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Marco Orbegoso, has been discharged in full. Marco Orbegoso 3891 Estey Avenue Naples, FL Folio No, Cost: OSM No: 26630080005 $681.18 2006-020362 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Marco Orbegoso, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ;)14.#l day of ~(U.Q(V ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ':(i~ By: 11111.,( ~~~~\.P .l~O.t -By: Mttst n to Clerk S1!1ft.turf 0111. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: right t County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Jeff E. Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135143 OR: 4335 PG: 0437 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:18AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK REC !BE coms 10.00 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROmCE 4TH !LOOR EIT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated March 17,2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 24, 2006, in O.R. Book 4023, Page 0882, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Jesus Ayala, has been discharged in full. Jesus Ayala 3144th Street S. Immokalee, FL Folio No. Cost: OSM No: 00127563307 $194.47 2005110778 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Jesus Ayala, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this dfl#t day of PLbrl4.a.ry ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUlER C TY, ORillA By:J!w..l. ~,~n{~ ,D uty Clerk Attttt IS to CM 11"Mfl \ "9ft.hrt 00 1 . Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: By: This instrument prepared hy: Jeff E. Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive. Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135144 OR: 4335 PG: 0438 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:18AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC FiB 10,00 cams 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR EXT 8406 16A? RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated March 17, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 24, 2006, in O.R. Book 4023, Page 0864, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Jean R. and Rosalee Darce & Roger Angervil, has been di scharged in full. Jean R. and Rosalee Darce & Roger Angervil 47 Royal Cove Drive Naples, Fl Folio No. Cost: OSM No: 71271920003 $256.06 2005120347 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Jean R. and Rosalee Darce & Roger Angervil and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this af4#l day of ~rull"Y , 2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIERC7Ty,FL RillA By: -:J'fJL By: ~(J 1 J1 et J~.L.L () ( . Attest 1$ C~ lclerk ,tgNtln .1" , CHAIRM Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: right County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Jeff E. Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135145 OR: 4335 PG: 0439 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:18AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC m 10,00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated March 17, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 24, 2006, in O.R. Book 4023, Page 0865, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Jean R. and Rosalee Darce & Roger Angervil, has been discharged in full. Jean R. and Rosalee Darce & Roger Angervil 47 Royal Cove Drive Naples, FI Folio No. Cost: OSMNo: 71271920003 $175.52 2005120346 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Jean R. and Rosalee Darce & Roger Angervil and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this .;lc,-fh day of FLbIUM,/ ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO TY, FLORIDA By: ~ 1', ~t~~:r~.t. By: Attttt as to eN I..... . 119ft1tur't Oft). Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: , CHAIR . Jeff . right Assis nt County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Jeff E, Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135146 OR: 4335 PG: 0440 *** RiCORDiD in OFFICIAL RiCORDS of COLLIiR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:18AK DWIGHT i, BROCK, CLiRK RiC FBi 10,00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLiRK TO THi BOARD INTBROFFICi 4TH FLOOR iXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated September 2, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on October 10, 2005, in OR Book 3907, Page 4042, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Robin Okolski, has been discharged in full. Robin Okolski 145 Capri Blvd Naples, FL Folio No. Cost: OSM No: 52399800008 $245_57 total 2005060680 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Robin Okolski, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ~(,-iJl day of f,d,(U4rt ,2008. By: attest .S S1Ql\ltwrt 00 1 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLL~!UN~TY' F ORillA By: ..:JrJ1- ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: , right nt County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135147 OR: 4335 PG: 0441 *** RHCORDHD in OFFICIAL RHCORDS of COLLIHR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:26AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC m 10,00 COPIBS 1,00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certiJY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated September I, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on September 12, 2006, in O.R. Book 4104, Page 1071, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Diane Muenze Gonzalez, has been discharged in full: Diane Muenze Gonzalez 3348 Bolero Way Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 68095560005 $187.72 OSM Case No. 2006050116 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Diane Muenze Gonzalez, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ;]f4-1J'1 day of ~(u(),ri ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By ~AJ - ~MW BY:~ fI~O.t. I IS , yt::lerk 11l1ftlture 011 h Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Dri ve Naples, Florida 34 J 04 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135148 OR: 4335 PG: 0442 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:16AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CL8RK RBC m 10.00 COPIBS 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BIT 8406 16t. ! RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certiJy that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated June 15,2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on October 15,2007, in O.R. Book 4292, Pages 0947-0948, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Josefina Munoz, has been discharged in full: Josefina Munoz 3026 Immokalee Drive Immokalee, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 00081120006 $2,000.00 OSM Case No. 2006-070623 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Josefina Munoz, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ~li4h day of r"u'(II.a.ry , 2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER /NTY, FLORIDA. By: J~ , CHAIRM By:jllJH AA.lL~.(/~O_l. M4._ 0 , D uty Clerk ....w.t IS to ell<< I,.... , "tIItart 0111. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135149 OR: 4335 PG: 0443 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:26AM DWIGHT B. 8ROCK, CLBRK RBC m 10,00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BIT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated April 7, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 24, 2006, in O.R. Book 4023, Page 0895, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by John C. and Sherri L. Morrison, has been discharged in full: John C. and Sherri L. Morrison 1280 Embassy Ln Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 2483]000006 $]70.97 OSM Case No. 2005]20724 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by John C. and Sherri L. Morrison, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this a {g +1. day of fl.bil.A,ary ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ::LLVORIDA. ~ By:]J.J1JL ~.O(r Attest as to t)iClerk 110111t.".. 001- Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135150 OR: 4335 PG: 0444 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:26AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC FBB 10,00 COPIBS 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Magistrate dated September 21, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on October 15,2007, in O.R. Book 4292, Pages 0766-0767, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Edward Dibene and Ruth Dibene, has been discharged in full: Edward Dibene and Ruth Dibene 124 Coral Vine Drive Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 65221360001 $132.79 OSM Case No. 2005-040566 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Edward Dibene and Ruth Dibene, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this d fJ -/JI day of p...t.bru. ary ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: lLuLI tt/:i;;lt1,1J.<- . Attest as to e I, , ,y Clerk "gHturt 011 h By: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples. Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135151 OR: 4335 PG: 0445 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:26AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC m coms 10,00 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBRO!FICB 4TH !LOOR BXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated August 10, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 11, 2006, in O.R. Book 4087, Page 2483, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Charles and Donna Aylsworth, has been discharged in full: Charles and Donna Aylsworth 2853 Poinciana Dr Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 68047280003 $1,127.97 OSM Case No. 2006050930 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Charles and Donna Aylsworth, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this :;~~ day of (-J./hruQt y ,2008. By:.o..uv.. 1L1~ J& QI:". Att.st ' puty Clerk I 'glial:: ~ I ;1It '!"11M S Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: J Ai . J~ -'-~~~ ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135152 OR: 4335 PG: 0446 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, PL 03/01/2008 at 09:26AM DWIGHT 8. 8ROCK, CLERK REC FBi 10,00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE ITH FLOOR EIT 8106 16A? RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated August 5, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 9, 2005, in O.R. Book 3863, Page 2934, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Betty Shaffer TR, has been discharged in full: Betty Shaffer TR 4620 Outer Dr Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 67494560005 $163.47 OSM Case No. 2005050079 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Betty Shaffer TR, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this <<(,tJ1 day of FV;(().u('1 ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: J1IJJ A ~ I~ I() C. . Attest ,; to c' sty Clerk "911'turt 0Il1 ~ By: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135153 OR: 4335 PG: 0447 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/01/2008 at 09:26AM DWIGHT 8, 8ROCK, CLBRK RBC FEE 10,00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROllICB ITH ILOOR BXT 8106 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated August 5, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 9, 2005, in OR Book 3863, Page 2938, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Richard Korman, has been discharged in full: Richard Korman 2960 Lunar St Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 53350040000 $163.47 OSM Case No. 2005051029 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Richard Korman, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this .;1",,11 day of Wf/..l(A'Y ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHTE. BROCK, Clerk , BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: ll.uu 1f. ':Jf-.... ().{ . Attest as to. uty Clerk 119ft1bn 0Il1. By: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135154 OR: 4335 PG: 0448 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/1008 at 09:16AK DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC m COPIBS 10,00 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16A? RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated August 5, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 9, 2005, in O.R. Book 3863, Page 2940, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Richard Korman, has been discharged in full: Richard Korman 2960 Lunar St Naples, Florida Folio No,: Cost: Reference: 53350040000 $163.47 OSM Case No. 2005051026 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Richard Korman, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this Jf.#l day of Yl--bru..ary ,2008. A TIEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER rTY, F ORIDA By: :J'fJJ-- By: (lJJU t~ J..- Ok.- Attest IS to I \lfY Clerk 111Jll1ture 0.11' Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~ Assistant County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135155 OR: 4335 PG: 0449 *** RiCORDiD in OFFICIAL RiCORDS of COLLIiR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:26AM DWIGHT i, BROCK, CLiRK RBC FBi 10,00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICi 4TH FLOOR BIT 8406 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN 16A7 ~. This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated May 19, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on June 5, 2006, in O.R. Book 4049, Page 1848, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Miquel and Daima Fernandez, has been discharged in full: Miquel and Daima Fernandez 1900 42nd St SW Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 35775720004 $160.03 OSM Case No. 2004040835 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Miquel and Daima Fernandez, and consents to this lien being discharged ofrecord. Dated this ~f.J-M day of wrL-lary ,2008. By: 1.1.u.tt ALtklUJ..(k_ Atte . -6 , rj~ty Clerk It as to Chatnlel , .'gn.twe OIth Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA i~~ By: ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk ~ Assistant County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135156 OR: 4335 PG: 0450 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/04/1008 at 09:16AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK REC m 10,00 COPIBS 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Magistrate dated August 17, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on September 13,2007, in OR Book 4281, Pages 0539-0540, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Melquiades R. Buckow, has been discharged in full: Melquiades R. Buckow 6461 Bottlebrush Lane Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 38456440008 $210.10 OSM Case No. 2005-110434 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Melquiades R. Buckow, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this J(P-lll day of r..l..-bru.o.ry ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E, BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By;J)..lJJ1 ~~ .n.t. Attest 1$ to '" I ul' Clerk ItpatlIre 0111' By: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: J'ff~ Assistant County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135158 OR: 4335 PG: 0452 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:30AK DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC FBi 10,00 COPlES 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated July 15, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on July 21, 2005, in O.R. Book 3850, Page 0401, ofthe Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Carlos Perez & Saily Fuentes, has been discharged in full: Carlos Perez & Saily Fuentes 5434 Texas Avenue Naples, Florida Folio No,; Cost: Reference: 62266200006 $157.14 OSM Case No. 2005060116 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Carlos Perez & Saily Fuentes, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ;)C.th day of iQ,brt.Aaf1 ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E, BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ::~L~ By:lUu..L ~ L}.t attett &$ to <b.11il tl' Clerk .t9ftlturt (MIl" Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~~ - ::fC:, Jeff righ Assistant County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135159 OR: 4335 PG: 0453 *** RECORDED in OPPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, PL 03/01/1008 at 09:30AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK REC m 10,00 cams 1,00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFPICE 4TH PLOOR EXT 8106 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated December 16,2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on January 6, 2006, in O.R. Book 3961, Page 0779, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Ginger Gandy, has been discharged in full: Ginger Gandy 1993 41 st Ter SW Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 35881360002 $1,868.97 OSM Case No. 2005080097 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Ginger Gandy, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ;2 " ~ day of _PLb fuar y ,2008. By: _l\.t.u L ~ Q c. Attest ... to t ~ Clerk st9l'Iturt 0111- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER -:~TY' F ORIDA. By: :J'fJ1-- ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135160 OR: 4335 PG: 0454 *** RBCORDBD in OPPICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, PL 03/04/2008 at 09:30AM DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLBRK RBC m 10.00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROPPICB 4TH PLOOR BIT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated July I, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on July 6, 2005, in O.R. Book 3837, Page 0581, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Dorene Clark, has been discharged in full: Dorene Clark 6171 Green Blvd Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 38332920008 $195.30 OSM Case No. 2005040777 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Dorene Clark, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ~ it {h day of P..t..h rWJ(Y ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA --Lk~ By: Jlll' 1 !:t 11 ~ J I rt\J .c.. . Attest .1 to 1"'" uty Clerk I igllltw't 0111. By: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~. , ~ Jeff ght ' Assist t County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135161 OR: 4335 PG: 0455 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/04/1008 at 09:30AN DWIGHT E, EROCK, CLERK REC FEE 10,00 COPIES 1,00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROPFICB 4TH PLOOR BXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated August 10, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on August II, 2006, in O.R. Book 4087, Page 2481, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Ricardo Ramirez & Sonia Garcia, has been discharged in full: Ricardo Ramirez & Sonia Garcia 4106 Mowhawk PI Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 60481080003 $1,948.73 OSM Case No, 2006040775 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Ricardo Ramirez & Sonia Garcia, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this d&.fh day of P.JJruary ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By:[LuJi ~n( Attest as t:s Clerk Sigut.-. 0111. By; Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: . Jeff ight Assis ant County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403.2496 *** 4135162 OR: 4335 PG: 0456 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:30AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC m 10,00 COPIES 1,00 Retn: CLBRK TO THE BOARD INTBROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Magistrate dated September 21, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on October 15,2007, in O.R. Book 4292, Pages 0741-0742, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Wayne C. Womack, has been discharged in full: Wayne C. Womack 2960 Van Buren A venue Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 52700960003 $247.42 OSM Case No. 2007-030825 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Wayne C. Womack, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this d~-l~ day of f1.JJrua.,.y ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By ;i, Ai . ~~ By:Cl.UH "V.JQL Atun as to , ,puty Clerk ,'!llIlt..n OAl- Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: , right t County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135163 OR: 4335 PG: 0457 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:30AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLBRK REC FEE 10,00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated August 22, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on September 6, 2006, in O.R. Book 4101, Page 0171, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Adan Hernandez, has been discharged in full: Adan Hernandez 1412 Peach St Immokalee, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 30683440002 $130.12 OSM Case No. 2006050747 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Adan Hernandez, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this JiJ-Ih day of F.tJJrUQ.fY ,2008. By: --'i.b u ~~ (l <.. ....,_.... " D uty Clerk , ft....~ .S to tnli \ It Q11lt.".t 0111. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: By; ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135164 OR: 4335 PG: 0458 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/01/2008 at 09:30AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC m 10,00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROmCB ITH FLOOR BXT 8106 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated May 5, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on May II, 2006, in O.R. Book 4035, Pages 0416-0417, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Cresencio Martinez, has been discharged in full: Cresencio Martinez 5257 Cypress Ln Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 60784200001 $170.66 OSM Case No. 2006020827 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Cresencio Martinez, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this a(,th day of J~ru.a(y ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOA!ill OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ::LIIY' nOlliOA h~ By:fulJl . ~.(. Attest as to 1 ~y Clerk '111Jftltlrt 0CI1. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34\ 04 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135165 OR: 4335 PG: 0459 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS 01 COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/0412008 at 09:30AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK REC PEE 10,00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROmCE 4TH nOOR EXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated May 5, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on May 11, 2006, in OR Book 4035, Pages 0418-0419, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Cresencio Martinez, has been discharged in full: Cresencio Martinez 5257 Cypress Ln Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 60784200001 $177.23 OSM Case No. 2006020828 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Cresencio Martinez, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ()(,.J.il day of ~b(l.I.o.ry ,2008. By: Atttlt .s Ch4 .tgqturt GIll ~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER JUNTY, F ORIDA. By: :J1Jt. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ( Jeff Assis This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples. Florida 34] 04 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135166 OR: 4335 PG: 0460 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COURTY, FL 03/04/1008 at 09:30AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC m 10,00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD IRTBROmCB 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16 i!-, fi/ RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated February 17, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on February 24, 2006, in O.R. Book 3988, Page 0987, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Johnnie McSwain Thomas Est., c/o Lucy R. Riley, has been discharged in full: Johnnie McSwain Thomas Est., c/o Lucy R. Riley 405 Carver St Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 66930360003 $179.19 OSM Case No. 2005100215 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Johnnie McSwain Thomas Est., c/o Lucy R. Riley, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this Jltt/) day of r.tJJru.at"i ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO TY, FLORIDA , CHAIRMA By: ^. 'Ll "~ J ~ tl, 0-(. By: AU;;t IS to , . . ui Clerk "llM~ OIl!. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: t ri t tant County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135167 OR: 4335 PG: 0461 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/04/1008 at 09:30AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLBRK REC!BE 10,00 COPIBS 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EIT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certil)- that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated January 19, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on February 5, 2007, in O.R. Book 4178, Pages 2584-2585, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Ashby and Denise Gilkeson, has been discharged in full: Ashby and Denise Gilkeson 5960 Green Blvd Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference; 38336640009 $27,500.00 OSM Case No. 2005-040921 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Ashby and Denise Gilkeson, and consents to this lien being discharged ofrecord. Dated this dr,oVl day of ~(lJ.a.(y ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO TY, FLORIDA By: ll..u..u.' ~n(. ataI\ as to ,puty Clerk .t~ 011'" By: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: t This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135168 OR: 4335 PG: 0462 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/1008 at 09:36AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC FEE 10.00 COPIBS 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16A7 ,:! RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated June 3, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on July 6, 2005, in OR Book 3837, Page 0553, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Dave Mobley Est., has been discharged in full: Dave Mobley Est. 157 4th Street Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 77213480000 $115.19 OSM Case No. 2005040747 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Dave Mobley Est., and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this d~ ill day of F' -v:>rua.fY ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA , CHAIRM By:_~.. ~~C(r ...., ,-- 't" ,D uty Clerk ....wt1 at to ~ I..... , . flNtllrt.on I . By: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~ Jeff ght Assis t County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 341 04 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135169 OR: 4335 PG: 0463 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:36AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK REC PEE 10,00 COFIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE EOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 8406 16A? RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certiJY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Magistrate dated July 6, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 10, 2007, in O.R. Book 4268, Pages 3964-3965, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Melquiades Segura and Maria Segura, has been discharged in full: Melquiades Segura and Maria Segura 612 Jefferson Avenue W Immokalee, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 63856040002 $400.00 OSM Case No. 2006-120370 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Melquiades Segura and Maria Segura, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this at,4h day of uhruary ,2008. ATTEST: . DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: J Al .J()1 ~~~ By: J)..uu ~ ~ ro .'-~ Atust IS to I ~ty Clerk 11gqt.... ORl- Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~ Jef W .ght Assis ant County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135170 OR: 4335 PG: 0464 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:36AM DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLBRK RBC m 10,00 COPIBS 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BiT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated April 20, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 26, 2005, in O.R. Book 3783, Page 0764, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Anthony Cesa, Beverly Frato and Joseph Frato, has been discharged in full: Anthony Cesa, Beverly Frato, and Joseph Frato Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: nla $118.42 OSM Case No. CO# 2005010252 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Anthony Cesa, Beverly Frato and Joseph Frato, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this O?(,f~ day of y-dJ fuo.y y ,2008. ATTEST:. '. . DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER /TY, FLORIDA BY~~ , CHAIRMif By: D.lH..I '~o.(. Atttlt IS to 1 . up Clerk .ignature (0)- Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Jeff ht Assist t County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135171 OR: 4335 PG: 0465 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:36AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC m 10,00 COPIRS 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROmCB 4TH FLOOR BIT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Magistrate dated September 7, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on September 26, 2007, in O.R. Book 4285, Pages 1768-1769, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by John Coffman and Joan Coffman, has been discharged in full: John Coffman and Joan Coffman 3508 Dorado Way Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 68045200001 $158.00 OSM Case No. 2005-080950 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by John Coffman and Joan Coffman, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this JiI-Ift day of P'.dJru.ary ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA . B:~~ to ct~~C~kL. By: "gn.turt 0111- Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: , CHAIRM ~ Jef ight Assis ant County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135172 OR: 4335 PG: 0466 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR CODNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:36AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC m 10.00 COPIBS 1,00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated August 22, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on September 6, 2006, in O.R. Book 4101, Pages 0169-0170, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Shirley Hufford, has been discharged in full: Shirley Hufford 1058 Elrado St Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 63401960003 $129.58 OSM Case No. 2006060894 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Shirley Hufford, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this dlJ.JJ.. day of ...flJ, (U AI V ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: 11"'un OIll By: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~ Jeff ght Assist t County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135173 OR: 4335 PG: 0467 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2008 at 09:36AK DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK REC FBi 10,00 COPIES 1,00 Retn: CLBRK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE lTH FLOOR EXT 8106 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated May 6, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on May 13, 2005, in O.R. Book 3797, Page 3842, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Juan Acevedo, has been discharged in full: Folio No.: Cost: Reference: n/a $300.00 OSM Case No. SO 145152 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Juan Acevedo, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ;JuJr. day of FtJ,ru."'1 ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER C,NTY, FLORIDA . By: J7R.- ,CHAI By:fulLl ~ Q.{. Mttst as' to, ,'uty Clerk "plIt"" Oft 1 · Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34] 04 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135174 OR: 4335 PG: 0468 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL OJ/04/2008 at 09:J6AK DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC m 10.00 coms 1,00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated April 6, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 19, 2007, in O.R. Book 4215, Pages 4130-4131, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Delius Adeka, has been discharged in full: Delius Adeka 5314 McCarty Street Naples, FL Folio No,: Cost: Reference: 62047120101 $6,339.28 OSM Case No. 2006-020265 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Delius Adeka, and consents to this lien being discharged ofrecord, Dated this ~t,~~ day of ~{(.(4(Y ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER /TY, F ORIDA By: J~ By: Jl.UH lcf '~~ J{A.()L . , puty Clerk Attest IS to Ch.11 rNll , ., g11ltUl"t 00 1 . Approved as to form and legal sufficiency; ~ Je 'gH Assis ant County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135175 OR: 4335 PG: 0469 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/01/2008 at 09:36AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC m 10,00 coms 1,00 Retn: CL8RK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB lTH FLOOR BIT 8106 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated April I, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 26, 2005, in OR Book 3783, Page 0757, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Charles Aylsworth, has been discharged in full: Charles Aylsworth 2853 Poinciana Drive Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 62570840000 $606.95 OSM Case No. CO# 2005020630 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Charles Aylsworth, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this Jill~ day of f'.drua.ry ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER C UNTY, FLORIDA ,CHAI By: 1)1111 ~ IJ;i,U L OL . MUst a, tol ,\ty Clerk 11gNtur. 0f11. By: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135176 OR: 4335 PG: 0470 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/01/1008 at 09:36AM DWIGHT 8, 8ROCK, CL8RK RBC m 10.00 COPI8S 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROmCB ITH FLOOR BIT 8106 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated May 6, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on May 13, 2005, in O.R. Book 3797, Page 3869, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Martin and Louisiana Mena, has been discharged in full: Martin and Louisiana Mena 2572 River Reach Drive Naples, FL Folio No.; Cost: Reference: 69654640006 $110.10 OSM Case No, 2005010536 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Martin and Louisiana Mena, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this a4t~ day of Kt,bru,afY ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By:f)JlU ~~O.{- Atttst as , Clerk 119l11t"" OIl . . By: ,CHAI Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: 'ght t County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135177 OR: 4335 PG: 0471 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:36AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC FBi 10,00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated June 2, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on July 6, 2005, in O.R. Book 3837, Page 0557, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Manuel Lamoglia, has been discharged in full: Manuel Lamoglia 2268 Hunter Blvd Naples, FL Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 36312240001 $2,148.37 OSM Case No. 2004120483 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Manuel Lamoglia, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this JlJ#1 day of F.t.hrutJ.1 ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E.BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLl7Y' FL RlDA .By: By: _()...L.u..l ~ () L Ilttett IS to ! ~ Clerk li...t..... 0(11- , CHAIRMA Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: r' ht t County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135179 OR: 4335 PG: 0473 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL OJ/04/1008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC FBB 10,00 coms 1,00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BIT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated August 10, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on August II, 2006, in O.R. Book 4087, Pages 2477-2478, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Ricardo and Irma Montes, has been discharged in full: Ricardo and Irma Montes 3504 Carson Lakes Circle Naples, FL Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 25577800721 $141.09 OSM Case No. 2006040689 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Ricardo and Irma Montes, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ;;;~ #I day of r-i.-bruary ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER /TY, F ORIDA. By: Jr'Jt- , CHAIRMAN BY:~, ~~'~I4"Or... ,.1 - , .t~ ~ ,4T t} flerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: t ht County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135180 OR: 4335 PG: 0474 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 0310412008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC FEE 10,00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THB BOARD INTEROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BIT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated August 22, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on September 6, 2006, in OR Book 4101, Page 0173, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Noe and Ivon Munoz, has been discharged in full: Noe and Ivon Munoz 5317 Warren St Naples, FL Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 62150760005 $126.22 OSM Case No. 2006050687 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Noe and Ivon Munoz, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this a(,ih day of F~f'lAQ.f'Ij ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER ymTY, F ORIDA. By: ,:Jf)1.-- By: Cl.u II ~ I,Q.(. ! Malt " to t,,~,r1i1#1\uty Clerk \ at...turt 001. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: . ht t County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135181 OR: 4335 PG: 0475 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/04/200S at 09:44AK DWIGHT E, EROCK, CLERK REC m 10.00 COPIES I.OO Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFPlCE 4TH FLOOR EXTS406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated September 22, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded on September 23, 2005, in O.R. Book 3896, Page 1737, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Frank Lagonigro, has been discharged in full: Frank Lagonigro 724 96th Ave N Naples, FL Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 62768200009 $140.05 OSM Case No. 2005020112 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Frank Lagonigro, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this J~ II> day of ~br(,.u.lt"y ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ::LLlliIl: . , CHAIRMAIf' By:lY.LtA ~((I~ to!..... Attest as to C f'1IIit uty Clerk .'...tan CMI I · Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~~ J ef right Assistant County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135182 OR: 4335 PG: 0476 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:44AK DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC FBB 10.00 COFIBS 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16A? RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated October 6, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on November 3, 2006, in O.R. Book 4132, Pages 1726-1727, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Julia Gomez, has been discharged in full: Julia Gomez 419 Jones St Immokalee, FL Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 56405040004 $137.30 OSM Case No. 2006070379 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Julia Gomez, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ;)lI-lil day of F..<.,bruary ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER rTY, FLORIDA . By: .J~ -1/ . ~ By:_().u.,u ~O( IIttUt It to ChQ1~uty Clerk 11gMtlll"f 01\1. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135183 OR: 4335 PG: 0477 *** RECOROED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL OJ/04/1008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK REC FBB 10,00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 840& iA7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated August 10, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on August 11, 2006, in O.R. Book 4087, Page 2484, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Esteban and Rita Martinez, has been discharged in full: Esteban and Rita Martinez 1401 Papaya St Immokalee, FL Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 30680080009 $130.12 OSM Case No. 2006050760 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Esteban and Rita Martinez, and consents to this lien being discharged of record, Datedthis J(,+h day of Flbru,ary ,2008, ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ::LLTt:A. , CHAIRM~ By: _llu..u t;f,.:;e,J-c.,O.(- Attest as to Ch )mty Clerk 11g1'1ltlll't 0111, Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135184 OR: 4335 PG: 0478 *** RECORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:44AK DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC FBB 10,00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 ~6A? RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated July 7, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on July 21, 2006, in O.R. Book 4076, Pages 0686-0687, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Francis P. Lord, has been discharged in full: Francis P. Lord 313 9 Caledonia Avenue Naples, FL Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 61780280008 $127.80 OSM Case No. 2006040832 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Francis P. Lord, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ~(, PI day of fih (1.1 ary ,2008. By: fLu{J~().t Mttlt IS -to & I 1f:y Clerk \St...turt 001. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIERYUNTY, F ORIDA. . By; Jf'Jt ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK; Clerk . Je~~ Assis nt County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34] 04 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135185 OR: 4335 PG: 0479 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:44AM D~IGHT E, BROCK, CLERK REC !BE 10.00 COPIES 1,00 Retn: CLERK TO THB BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EIT 8406 16A? RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certifY that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated March 3, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on March 20, 2006, in O.R. Book 4001, Page 0298, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Patricia K. Sullivan, has been discharged in full: Folio No.: Cost: Reference: n/a $50.00 OSM Case No. SO 152122 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Patricia K. Sullivan, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this J(,I-}-' day of r.t.bru.(.uy ,2008. By: llll (.A t'~ L. O.{ Attest as to 1 ~y Clerk .iglltn Clll h BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By i AI - ~~ ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: t t County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Jeff E. Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, florida 34104 (239) 213-2939 *** 4135186 OR: 4335 PG: 0480 *** RBCORDED in OPPICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, PL 03/01/1008 at 09:11AM DWIGHT 8, BROCK, CLBRK RBC PBB coms 10.00 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROmCB ITH PLOOR BIT 8106 , 6A7 j !I!l! RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated January 19, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on February 5, 2007, in O,R. Book 4178, Page 2576 and 2577, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by BFS Retail and Commercial Operation, LLC, has been discharged in full. Folio No. Cost: OSM No: 74410720003 $19,435,12 2005-040764 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by BFS Retail and Commercial Operation, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this a~fh day of nbruCiI'Y ,2008. BY:~ Attest as "glIItln 01 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLL7UNTY, ORillA By: --." lJL-- A TrEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk , CHAIR AN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: " This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135187 OR: 4335 PG: 0481 *** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2008 at 09:44AK DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC m 10,00 COPIBS 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated March 2, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on March 20, 2007, in O.R. Book 4199, Pages 1612-1613, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Tereso Bautista and Emiliana Lopes Vasquez, has been discharged in full: T ereso Bautista and Emiliana Lopes Vasquez 3545 23rd Avenue SW Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 38045920007 $500.00 OSM Case No. 2005-110329 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Tereso Bautista and Emiliana Lopes Vasquez, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ~(,+h day of (i.brua.,y ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ::L7~A. , CHAIRM~ By: ~ ~O..c... MUIt. t' to C I, ty Clerk .~ Qlll. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: J ff right As . tant County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples. Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135188 OR: 4335 PG: 0482 *** RBCORDBD in OIIICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, IL 03/04/1008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC !BE 10,00 coms 1,00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBRomCB 4TH FLOOR BIT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated March 3, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on March 20, 2006, in O.R, Book 4001, Page 0294, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Janet M. Clark, has been discharged in full: Folio No.: Cost: Reference: n/a $250.00 OSM Case No. SO 151737 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Janet M. Clark, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this d(,th day of P-UJrwuy ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER C UNTY, FLORIDA . By:1Yw ~O(- '~ttest as to I , dty Clerk S19ft.~ 0111- By: ,CHAI Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135189 OR: 4335 PG: 0483 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/04/1008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC PEE 10.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated March 3, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on March 20,2006, in O.R. Book 4001, Page 0296, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Edward J. Bauman, has been discharged in full: Folio No.: Cost: Reference: n/a $50.00 OSM Case No. SO 152401 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Edward J. Bauman, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this 0l~#J day of P,u,rUtI('/ ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIE7TY, FLORIDA . By: ''i':JL-----.4 .. . - . ~ By: _lttu 1 ~ ~ O. C-. . ,utv Clerk Attnt as to h<<l "S ,........ oAl ~ Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ight ant County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135190 OR: 4335 PG: 0484 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER CODNTY, FL 03/04/1008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC PEE 10.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROmCE 4TH FLOOR EIT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated March 3,2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on March 20, 2006, in O.R. Book 4001, Page 0295, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Phyllis A. Emens, has been discharged in full: Folio No.: Cost: Reference: n/a $250.00 OSM Case No. SO 151709 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Phyllis A. Emens, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this d(,#l day of ~(u.f.uy ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COlL~O~ By::JfjL.--- , CHAI AN By: (Lu.-u. ~r:u.-'-tO.t. AttJlt as to I ptlty Clerk Ii on.turt 001. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135191 OR: 4335 PG: 0485 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/04/1008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLBRK REC PEE 10.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated March 3, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on March 20, 2006, in O.R. Book 4001, Page 0293, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Wilbert M. Beacham, has been discharged in full: Folio No.: Cost: Reference: n/a $50.00 OSM Case No. SO 152418 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Wilbert M. Beacham, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this J~~ day of WrutAfY ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER crTY, F ORIDA . By: 1<rn- BY~~U~~'\O ~~~l~~- stlJMtlII't 001. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: , This instrument prepared by: Arlene Harper Administrative Secretary 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 403-2496 *** 4135192 OR: 4335 PG: 0486 *** RBCORDED in OFPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, PL 03/04/1008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC PEE 10.00 COPIES 1,00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTERomCE 4TH FLOOR BXT 8406 16A7 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated August 22, 2006, a certified copy of which was recorded on September 6, 2006, in O.R. Book 4101, Pages 0169-0170, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Shirley Hufford, has been discharged in full: Shirley Hufford 1058 Elrado St Naples, Florida Folio No.: Cost: Reference: 63401960003 $129.58 OSM Case No. 2006060894 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Shirley Hufford, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this J~ 41\ day of F..J.lJ rua.(t ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA . By: CluM' ~O.(. By: MttI\- as .\f) ~ Clerk ItgHturt 00 i · , CHAIRM Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~.~ Jeff r ght Assis t County Attorney *** 4135193 OR: 4335 PG: 0487 *** RECORDED in OPPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, PL 03/04/1008 at 09:44AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLBRK REC m 10.00 COPIES 1.00 This instrument prepared by: Jerr E. Wright Assistant County Attorney 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Ste 301 Naples, F]orida 34104 (239) 2]3-2939 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROmCE 4TH FLOOR EIT 8406 16A? RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Order of the Special Master dated April 6, 2007, a certified copy of which was recorded on April 19,2007, in OR Book 4215, Page 4144 and 4145, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County, owned by Brenda Soto, has been discharged in full. Brenda Soto 5410 Catts Street Naples, FL Folio No. Cost: OSM No: 52399800008 $350.00 2005-080446 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Brenda Soto, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this J~~ day of r.u,ru.o,fY ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ByJLu.,1l ~~Ii!dl' Q.C. By: Attllt as to ru uty Clerk S1Q11.tUl't 001' . . ,CH AN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~ Assistant County Attorney ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 A TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 10 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item,) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exee tion of the Chairman's si nature, draw a line thrau h routin lines #1 thrau h #4, com lete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routin order 1. 2. n ~'.;;J -0 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chaimlan's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Staff J Contact Agenda Date Item was A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION I\~ I-+O\>\~l.OoQ:[ t1 l..lu.le ~ ~O LvlloN. Phonc Number x S t5"1- le./J, - III I Agenda Item Number OB,t1 Number of Original Documents Attached Initial the Yes column or mark "N/ A" in the Not Applicab]e column, whichevcr is Yes N/A (Not appropriate. (Initial) Applicable) 1. Original document has been signedlinitialed for lega] sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, /' resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Officc and signature pages from contracts, agreements. etc. that have bcen fully executed by all patties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and possibly State Officials.) 2. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's - Office and all other parties except the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board 3. The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the ,- document or the final negotiated contract date whichcver is applicable. 4. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's ,./ signature and initials are required. 5. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Fi]son in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. ~ Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines! 6. The document was approved by the BCC on :J.~"'- D'il (enter date) and all changes N/A is not made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The ~ an option for County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan~es, if applicable. line 6. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST I: forms! County forms/ Bee forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 MEMORANDUM Date: March 4, 2008 To: John Houldsworth, Senior Engineer Engineering Services Department From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Resolution 2008-42 Enclosed please find one copy of the document as referenced above (Agenda Items # 16AI0), approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 252-8411. Thank you. Enclosure 16Al0 16A10 RESOLUTION NO. 08-E- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF CERTAIN ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN MEDITERRA PARCEL 103, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 34, PAGES 26 THROUGH 29; RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY; AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE VILLORESI NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on March 14,2000 approved the plat of Mediterra Parcel 103 for recording; and WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway and drainage improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended); and WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway and drainage improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Engineering and Environmental Services Department has inspected the roadway and drainage improvements, and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance is hereby granted for those roadway and drainage improvements in Mediterra Parcel 103, pursuant to the plat thereofrecorded in Plat Book 34, pages 26 through 29, and the Clerk is hereby authorized to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for those roadway and drainage improvements that are not required to be maintained by the Villoresi Neighborhood Association. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same, this ;}ftJ#1 day of F.ilJrt-l/lt1 ,2008. " ,?J, ", ~. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER C UNTY, LORIDA 6( Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Item # {(OAIO Agenda 2..-Iz. k Ire: Dale ~~j ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 1 6 A 11 TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Prinl on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered La the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or infonnation needed. lfthe document is already complete with the exee tion of the Chairman's si ature, draw a line throu h roulin lines # I thrau h #4, com Jete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson line #5 . Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date List in routin order 1. Ji 2. ;). )of.,. 0 'g 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summa!)'. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chainnan's signature are to be delivered to the BCC office only after the BCe has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Staff Contact Agenda Date Item was A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Phone Number k sg 1- \-1 2h 101 Agenda Item Number Ic,...A' I ~c.t ,,\- ~ "'" 3 Number of Original Documents Attached Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is Yes N/A(Not aonrooriate. (Initial) Aoolicable) 1. Original document has been signed/initialed for ]egal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, /' resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and possibly State Officials.) 2. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's r' Office and all other parties except the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board 3. The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the ~ document or the final ne2:otiated contract date whichever is aODlicable. 4. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's ,,/ signature and initials are reauired. 5. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. ~ Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCe's actions are nullified. Be aware ofvour deadlines! 6. The document was approved by the BCC ond.;;ll. ,(1 V (enter date) and all changes N/A is not made during the meeting have heen incorporated iu the attached document. The 9f an option for Countv Attornev's Office has reviewed the chanves, if annlicahle. line 6. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST J: Forms/ County Forms/BCC Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Origina19.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 16All MEMORANDUM Date: March 4, 2008 To: John Houldsworth, Senior Engineer Engineering Services Department From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Resolution 2008-43 Enclosed please find one copy of the document as referenced above (Agenda Items # 16All), approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 252-8411. Thank you. Enclosure 16All RESOLUTION NO. 08- 43 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF CERTAIN ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN CLASSICS PLANTATION ESTATES, PHASE ONE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 37, PAGES 87 THROUGH 90; RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY; AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE CLASSICS PLANTATION ESTATES HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on June 6, 2001 approved the plat of Classics Plantation Estates, Phase One for recording; and WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway and drainage improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended); and WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway and drainage improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Engineering Services Section of the Development Services Department has inspected the roadway and drainage improvements, and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance is hereby granted for those roadway and drainage improvements in Classics Plantation Estates, Phase One, pursuant to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 37, pages 87 through 90, and the Clerk is hereby authorized to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for those roadway and drainage improvements that are not required to be maintained by the Classics Plantation Estates Homeowners' Association. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same, this ~d~~o\ F'L'orw.ry ,2008. ;1..,' C",~>,., DA 1;~\i:~:;!:f(:l\.~€ AmST" . '. . D:~I ::;mt~~ ,. '..'.. :~::~url:~~l~,~~~U~~;i:~~1 sufj7fi~rcY: , I I BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER ~~Y' FRIDA By: :JfJ1-- TOM HENNING, CHAIRMA Item # I~A-Il Agenda Zhk ftif: Date ~. Date z..J., ill~1:. ~~~~c Deputy Clerk ....-:""" \D (tlCY"d .3"'3~ ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 16 Pr;nt on pink pap}~~h ~~~~)C~,~,S~~'~';":n~~~~!c~~~l~~~'~~ l~r,~,~~~,~~~o~,~~~~~~~nd original C 1 do(.;umcnts are 1.0 be forwarded 1.0 the BOard Office only afh'f the Board l1<)s taken uction on lhe item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exec tion of the Chainnan's si nature, draw a line throll h routin lines # 1 thrau h #4, com Jete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date List in routin order 2. PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing infonnation. All original documents nccding the Bee Chairman's signature are to he delivered to the Bee ol1lce only altcr the Bee has acted to approve the item. 3. 4. Board of County Commissioners Name of Primary Staff Pam Callis Phone Number 403-2359 Contact Agenda Date Item was February 26, 2008 Agenda Item Number 16CI A roved b the BCC Type of Document Executive Summary, Number of Original Attached Satisfactions of Lien Documents Attached 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office Yes (Initial) 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chainnan, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exee t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the Bee's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 2/26/2008 (enter date) and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Iicable. 1J~ :ye 'j) t!- ..ilC!.. ....J/ ~pl? -])t. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. I: Fomlsl County Fomlsl Bee Forms! Original Documcnts Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16Cl Recommendation to adopt a Resolution to approve the Satisfactions of Lien for Solid Waste residential accounts wherein the County has received payment and said Liens are satisfied in full for the 1991, 1995, and 1996 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Assessment. Fiscal impact is $68.50 to record the Satisfactions of Lien. OBJECTIVE: Adopt a Resolution approving the Satisfactions of Lien for residential accounts where the County has received payment in full for the 1991, 1995, and 1996 Solid Waste Collection Services Special Assessment. CONSIDERATIONS: Resolution No. 93-29 adopted by the Board on January 26, 1993 provided for the recording of the list of 1991 delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessment and a mailing of a written notice of the imposition of each residential unit lien. Resolution No. 93-29 was recorded on February 1, 1993 in Official Record Book 1793, Pages 459 through 598 of the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, which placed a lien on certain residential properties for the 1991 Solid Waste Collection Services Special Assessment. Resolution No. 2000-236 adopted by the Board on August 1, 2000 provided for the recording of the list of 1995 delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessment and a mailing of a written notice of the imposition of each residential unit lien. Resolution No. 2000-236 was recorded on August 8, 2000 in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273 of the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, which placed a lien on certain residential properties for the 1995 Solid Waste Collection Services Special Assessment. Resolution No. 2000-237 adopted by the Board on August 1,2000 provided for the recording of the list of 1996 delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessment and a mailing of a written notice of the imposition of each residential unit lien. Resolution No. 2000-237 was recorded on August 8, 2000 in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309 of the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, which placed a lien on certain residential properties for the 1996 Solid Waste Collection Services Special Assessment. Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, provides the Satisfactions of Lien shall be approved by Resolution. The attached Resolution lists the five accounts that have paid in full for the 1991, 1995, and 1996 Solid Waste Collection Services Special Assessment Lien. FISCAL IMP ACT: The fiscal impact for recording the Satisfactions of Lien and the Resolutions is approximately $68.50, which is to be charged to County Water/Sewer Operating Fund (408). 16Cl GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management impact associated with these items. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached Resolution approving the five Satisfactions of Lien for the accounts listed in the Resolutions and authorizing the Chairman to sign the five Satisfactions of Lien for the 1991, 1995, and 1996 Solid Waste Collection Services Special Assessment Lien. PREPARED BY: Pam Callis, Revenue Supervisor, Utility Billing and Customer Service. RESOLUTION NO. 2008 _ 44 16Cl A RESOLUTION APPROVING SATISFACTIONS OF LIEN FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE PAID IN FULL THE 1991, 1995, AND 1996 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS t'l ~ I--I"-:>~ -...J=l::"""<'D l\J>-i'fI:><:J...... C>::l:oo :::I J::=:.~:-:-<: .. o_~ WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, the Board of ~ :: ='" = County Commissioners on January 26, I 993 adopted Resolution No. 93-29 authorizing the recording ~, = ,- - = '-'l t:cJ '" of notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments ~ = = ~, for 1991; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, the Board of County = :::; co = -.= = = Commissioners on August I, 2000 adopted Resolution No. 2000-236 authorizing the recording of.;s. ~ ~...... ~ notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for :: :: ~ ....,.~~ = co 1995 and ;:' ~ ...t:::=. ~ ~.+::::o .~ = ::lII: ;;::: c:> WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, the Board of ~ :; ?:' t;-") t:o<:1 "'= .~ ~ ...t:::.. County Commissioners on August 1,2000 adopted Resolution No. 2000-237 authorizing the recording ~ ~ c.....> = 0 <.....> ::O~. ...a:::::. = = = of notices ofliens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments '" g 'U ~ ~ G'") I:;:-' tx:l ...- = ~, = for 1996 and ~ g c.....> = --l ~--.J ~ ..J;:::::. WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, requires the Board to approve by Resolution and record in the Official Records Satisfactions of Lien on all accounts that have been paid in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of the 1991, 1995, and 1996 Service Year Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Special Assessments for the following accounts numbered below, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. 93-29, 2000-236, 2000-237, whereupon liens have been recorded on real property pertaining to the accounts identified herein. The Satisfactions of Lien attached hereto referencing the accounts identified herein are hereby approved and the Chairman is hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, and the Clerk is directed to record this Resolution and these Satisfactions of Lien individually in the official records of Collier County: Account No. 22282 24536 29696 87308 94252 - ,- = = = = ~= =- ~= = '0 = = ~ = = This Resolution adopted this d.i.L day of Febr'Ul1..r~, 2008, after motion, second and majority vote. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ~ ~~O.C-. Atttft . to Qi , . ~~s""tm and lega f . cy: ~ BY; TOM 16Cl ><- ><- ><- C) ::0 ...". c...., LV ...". --a c;-) LV --:J -..] <...n ><- ><- ><- *** 4134845 OR: 4334 PG: 3776 *** RBCORDBD in OPPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY. PL 03i03i2008 at 02:31PM DWIGHT B. BROCK. CLERK RBC PEB 10.00 coms 1.00 This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 774- 8400 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTBROPFICE 4TH FLOOR EX! 7240 Property Folio No. 64920280001 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: AYALA, MARY GARCIA 1706 PALM AVE IMMOKALEE FL 33934-0000 The Lien was recorded on the 1st day of February 1993, in Official Record Book 1793, Pages 459 through 598, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Two Dollars and No Cents ($102.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: PALM EST S 93FT N 186FT LOT 4 + S 94FT LOT 4 OR 818 PG 660 Folio No. Project No. Account No. 64920280001 60000 87308 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 01 ~ t;h day of Fehruo.. ")i . 2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK . .to By: TOM ~avid C. eigel County Attorney 16Cl This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 774- 8400 *** 4134846 OR: 4334 PG: 3777 *** RECORDED In OFPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIBR COONTY, PL OJ/OJ/2U08 at 02:J1PM DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC PEE 10.00 coms 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THB BOARD INTEROmCB 4TH FLOOR EKT 7240 16C1 Property Folio No. 68342480003 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: MORRIS, EARL W & KATHY A 66 ISLE PF ST THOMAS NAPLES 33961-0000 The Lien was recorded on the 1 st day of February 1993, in Official Record Book 1793, Pages 459 through 598, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Ninety Nine Dollars and Forty Four Cents ($199.44) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: PORT AU PRINCE L T 66 OR 1145 PG 1568 Folio No. Project No. Account No. 68342480003 60000 94252 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 61 tP t:h day of Februa"(4 , 2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK a, Ailf:iI!JMIns lift It'Orm a~ ,n~ David C. eigel County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 774-8400 *** 4134847 OR: 4334 PG: 3778 *** RECORDED In OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL OJi03i1008 at 02:31PM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLBRK REC PEE ]0.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTEROmCB 4TH FLOOR m 7240 16Cl Property Folio No. 62203480009 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: BOWER, WILLlAM=& RUTH 5537 SHOL TZ ST NAPLES FL 341138766 The Lien was recorded on the 8th day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Two Dollars and Eighty Nine Cents ($102.89), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES MANOR EXT BLK 5 LOT 15 Folio No. Project No. Account No. 62203480009 65000 22282 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisO?& day of Febf'ua?4 2008. ' ATTEST: . DWIGHT 'E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER C UNTY, ORIDA . 0.(.. By: This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 774-8400 *** 4134848 OR: 4334 PG: 3779 *** RECORDED In OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03103/2008 at 02:31PM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK RBC m 10.00 COPIBS ].00 Retn: CLBRK TO THE BOARD INTERomCE 4TH FLOOR BXT 7240 Property Folio No: 62203480009 16Cl SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: BOWER, WILLlAM=& RUTH 5537 SHOL TZ ST NAPLES FL 341138766 The Lien was recorded on the 8TH day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES MANOR EXT BLK 5 LOT 15 Folio No. Project No. Account No. 62203480009 66000 24536 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thi~ day of Fehrua?l 2008. ATTEST: BOARD OF UNTY OMMlSSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER C NTY, ORIDA . ~~ (ll.LIA ~l.By: ~.n to C1(jtl'lllli}, - TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN Ap~... todbtm Q7cienc~-; rD!v~ c.;;C County Attorney This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 774-8400 *** 4134849 OR: 4334 PG: 3780 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 0'/03/1008 at 02:31PM DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 10.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BXT 1240 Property Folio No: 68342480003 16Cl SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: CATETE, JOSE LUIS LUCILA CATETE 66 ISLE OF SAINT THOMAS ST NAPLES FL 341149402 The Lien was recorded on the 8TH day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: PORT AU PRINCE LOT 66 OR 1860 PG 1561 Folio No. Project No. Account No. 68342480003 66000 29696 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisdC.:z.. day of Fehru..~ 2008. . ATTEST: DWIGHT EO, BROCK, CLERK BOAR..~OF OUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER OUNT LORlDA . By: . TOM HENNIN , CHAIRM ApM~\\t"a\m'lorm and legal sufficiency ~ ~/ 1; David C. igel County Attorney 10 {((oid 3-3~ ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 16 C 2 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Origmul documenls should be hand dchvcrcd to the Board Ot1icc. n1C completed routing slip and original documents are to he forwarded to the Board Office only afh.'r the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exec lion of the Chainnan's si ature, draw a line thrall h routin lines # 1 thrau h #4, com lete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson line #5 . Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date List in routin order) 1. 2. PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the BCe Chairman's sIgnature are to he dcliver..:d to the Bce office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item.) 3. 4. Name of Primary Staff Pam Callis Phone Number 403-2359 Contact Agenda Date Item was February 26, 2008 Agenda Item Number 16C2 Approved bv the BCC Type of Document Executive Summary, Exhibit A and Number of Original I Attached Satisfaction of Notice of Claim of Lien Documents Attached 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 1}6 ;])(!.,. J)~ 1)C 1)~ 1J~ 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office I: Forms/ County Fomls/ Bee Forms/ Original Documcnts Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in lhe Nol Applicable column, whichever is a fO nate, Original document has been signed/inilialed for ]egal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chainnan, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossib] State Officials. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by lhe County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs arc placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the Bec office within 24 hours ofBCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCe's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines~ The document was approved hy the BCC on 2/26/2008 (enter date) and all changes made dnring the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The Count Attorne lS Office has reviewed the chao es, if a licable. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16C2 Recommendation to approve, execute and record a Satisfaction of a Notice of Claim of Lien for Sanitary Sewer System Impact Fee. Fiscal impact is $10.00 to record the Satisfaction of Lien. OBJECTIVE: Recommendation that the Board acknowledges full payment and executes the Satisfaction of Claim of Lien. CONSIDERATIONS: The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida as the Governing Body of Collier County and as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water/Sewer District of Collier County, Florida, recorded the Claim of Lien in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" Full payment and satisfaction of this lien have been made. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the Satisfaction of Claim of Lien. FISCAL IMPACT: Payment in full for this Claim of Lien increases the cash flow in the County's Sewer Impact Fee (Fund 413) by $1,055.00. The fiscal impact for recording this Satisfaction of Claim of Lien is approximately $10.00, which is to be charged to (Fund 408) the County Water/Sewer Operating Fund Utility Billing cost center. GROWTH MANAGEMENT: There is no Growth Management impact associated with this item. RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to acknowledge full payment and the satisfaction of this lien and to surrender the same canceled, and to direct the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County to cancel the same of record. Authorize the Chairman to execute the Satisfaction of Claim of Lien. PREPARED BY: Pam Callis, Revenue Supervisor, Utility Billing Customer Service. EXHIBIT "A" 1. J. Bryan Emory & June P. Riggin, securing the principal balance of one thousand fifty five dollars ($1,055.00). Folio# 31155007024. 11:0, f!6.02 .~-, v This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 774-8400 *** 4134814 OR: 4334 PG: 3736 *** RBCORDED In OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 03/03/1008 at 02:16PM DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLBRK REC FEE 10.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THB BOARD INTERomCE 4TH FLOOR BXT me 16C2 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF CLAIM OF LIEN FOR SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEES KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: J. BRYAN EMORY AND JUNE P RIGGIN 19237 SAVANNAH ROAD GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE, 19947 The Lien was recorded on the 10TH day of February 2005, in Official Record Book 3731, Page(s) 3982, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand Fifty Five Dollars and No Cents ($1,055.00), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: UNIT #3 ZIRCON, ENCHANTING SHORES CO-OP, A CO-OPERATIVE MOBILE HOME PARK LOCATED IN COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 31155007024 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water-Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full Satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this~ day of FebruQ;:J ,2008. .... ,,,,,,'. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~~lt. /4e:rQG~ ......... 011 h ' Approved as to form and Legal sufficiency: ~ /KJwCEl COUNTY ATTORNEY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMtSSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORiDA, AS THE _ GOVERNING BODY OF CQLUERCOUNTY AND AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARDOp: THE COLLIER COUNTY WATE;R-SEWER" DISTRICT, . Td~N,"~A~ ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 D 1 TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document Original dOCllt11~1l1s should he hand delivered to the 8o<:lrd Ornce. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be Ic)rwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item,) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or inlormation needed. If the document is already complete with the r h Ch' d I' h r # h h #4 I h h k' d . exceptIOn 0 t e airman s sIgnature, raw a me througl routmg tnes It roug , complete tee ec "lIst, an forward to Sue Filson (lme #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routin!!: order) I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service .::ti-- Z/zv 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of tile original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information, All original documents needing the BCC Chainnan's signature are to be delivered to the BCe office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Slaff Frank Ramsey. Housing Manager Contact Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Phone Number Agenda Item Number Number of Original Documents Attached 252-2336 ]6D Yes (Initial) N/A(Not A licable) 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances. resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board lbe Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved hy the BCC on 02/t2/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Iicable. 1( '4/-... 7f-. 7(c n/a 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1i 17C I: Forms/ County Fonns/ Bee Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 Return to 4134088 OR: 4334 PG: 1225 RBCORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. Fl 01/19/1008 at 01:10PM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLER~ REC FEE COPIES 27.00 3.00 \) Frank Ramsey Collier County HHS 3301 F:. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 341 12 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT7W 16D1 File# 08-133-IF This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this .d...& day of January. 2008, between Collier County. a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Margarita Del Socorro Escobar" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as 'The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impacl fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective dale of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "8," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three Hundred Seventv Two and 46/100 Dollars ($19,372.46). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A." which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against Ihe dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and Ihis Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tcnant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY OR: 4334 PG: 1226 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordinal,6 D 1 or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO INTY, F ORIDA, . .J/ By:JllUJ, ~1~. C\L' , r: lerk Attht II. CWI " 11",.turt CMll- By: OWNER: I-k~~ eLf fmMO &~ ~el Socorro Escobar ~es.ses' /. ; r )J)~~~ Print Name I . tfS. STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) OWNER: 2008, greement was acknowledged before me this ~ day of J{,U\\JO-'~ ' \). . xo\.,c,.c, who is personally known to me or has pr uced as proof of identity. Ap an /} ~~/U- '~2QFJ~.4 Signature of Person Taking Ackno~ledgment ssista Recommend Approval: ~id^~~ Director Collier County Housing and Human Services *** OR: 4334 PG: 1227 *** EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 165, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 13417 Gemmer Road, Naples, Florida 34114 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type ofImpact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee J. Water Impact Fee K. Sewer Impact Fee TOTAL IMPACT FEES JAK Approved_I_I_ Amount Owed $ I 00.59 $62.08 $368.18 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $4 I 0.00 $171.61 $3,415.00 $3,515.00 $19,372.46 16Dl ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 16 D 2 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered 10 the Board Office lhe completed routing slip and original documents are to be lorwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken aclioll on the item,) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the excention aCthe Chairman's sionature, draw a line throul1h routinp lines # 1 through #4, comnlete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routin!? order) I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service '7? ?-/7 '6 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONT ACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending BCe approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Staff Contact Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Frank Ramsey. Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336 16D - 2-- Yes (Initial) NIA (Not A licable) Agenda Item Number t Fee Deferra] Agreement Number of Original Documents Attached '1{ nla .fL '% 11 ff- I. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions. etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracls. agreements. etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossib] State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arlies exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. [n most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the ehan es, if a licable. I: Forms! County Forms! Bee Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised] .26.05, Revised 2.24.05 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. \(7 \ Return to 4134089 OR: 4334 PG: 1228 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL 01/29/2008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK REC PEE COPIES 17.00 UO Frank Ramsey Collier County HHS 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Floridll34112 Retn: CLERK TO THB BOARD INTEROmCE 4TH FLOOR EXT 7140 16D2 File# 08-134- IF This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into Ihis 2li.. day of January, 2008. between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Esaie Foreste and Lyla Foreste" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: I. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of Ihe Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impacl fees deferred shall be paid 10 the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the Iransfer. As set forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three Hundred Seventv Two and 46/1 00 Dollars ($19,372.46). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the tolal fee amount 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with Ihis Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interesl, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner. lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory complelion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default undcr the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY - OR: 4334 PG: 1229 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ord:n~,D 2 or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of Ihe County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: DWIGHT E. BROCK; Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, B;: (\.LuA ~n-.twtJ'p.c- IlttUt IS Chi? flerk ItllftWt 0111- By: '..'6' YltUk OWNER: /-7' ~ . ./ /. if; ,~ . t1'J, 0 (~'7G:J . Esaie Foreste / W~~ /? :J ;>u- / piintName A);" ."",- ~. 1M, . 7 OWNER: Y;j ttlm. ~ L;''-t~reste ! u u/ S - STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) 2008, The foregoing Agreement was acknowledged before me this ;28 day of j(,nIJOI "ls ' by Eso~e .. [..:,10 ~"'J\e , who is personally known to me or has prod ced , as proof of identity. _.. -- [NOTARIAL SEAL] Recommend Ap /-1 L~ cy Krumbin PA Director Collier County Housing and Human Services *** OR: 4334 PG: 1230 *** EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 161, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 13437 Gemmer Road, Naples, Florida 34114 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type ofImpact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee J. Water Impact Fee K. Sewer Impact Fee TOTAL IMPACT FEES JAK Approved -.-1_1_ 16D2 Amount Owed $100.59 $62.08 $368.18 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $410.00 $171.61 $3,415.00 $3,515.00 $19,372.46 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered 10 the Board OHlee. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after thi; Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP 16D3 Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, andlor information needed. If the document is already complete with the exception afthe Chairman's signature, draw a line throUl:!h routing lines # I Ihrou 111 #4, comolete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routinl!: order) I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service 7t ? /l I{ 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one ot'the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact stafT for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature arc to be delivered to the Bee office only after the BCC has acted to approve the item.) Name of Primary Staff Contact Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336 16D- :::, Yes (Initia]) N/A(Not A licable) Agenda Item Number Impact Fee Deferral Agreement ~ Number of Original Documents Attached -It ,. #- n/a I. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column. whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception ofrnost letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to Ihe Board and ossibly State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Oftice and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si ature and initials are re uircd. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Fi]son in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the ehan es, if a lieable. 7L lIL 71--- 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. I: Forms/ County Forms/ BCC Fanus/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Rcvist:d 2.24.05 Return to 4134090 OR: 4334 PG: 1231 RBCORDED In OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY. FL 01/19/1008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E, BROCK. CLERK REC PEE COPIES 17.00 3.00 \;0-; Frank Ramsey Collier County HHS 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTERomCE 4TH FLOOR BX1'7240 16D3 File# 08-BI-IF This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this :J8 day of January, 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Antoinette Laguerre" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County. Florida, known as 'The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impacl fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not laler then Ihe effective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "8," the amount of the dcferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three Hundred Seventv Two and 46/1 00 Dollars ($19,372.46). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operale as a lien againsl the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred. assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest. this I ien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any I ien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement. and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY OR: 4334 PG: 1232 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordinan!,6 D 3 or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the ofticial records of the County at no cosl to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER C UNTY. 'LORIDA. '0 BY:_tl.uu ).~oe Attest IS to6cw.~ ty flerk I f9!tlt.".. on I . ~, " . By: l:sit" Print Name i~%~\1' S)(PXY'\Ot!\ OWNER: (J/k~ )'.cL~~e Antoinette Laguerre OWNER: Witn ses: Print Name r STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) 2008, The f9.,regoing Agreement was acknowledged before mc this ~ day of J'lrlllClI'-l , by / -\ ' Lo.3 ,-x, rt: , who is pes.sonally known to me or has pr6duced '. as proof of identity. 1 ~m :~tl~ ~ Signature of Person Taking Ackno edgment [NO' _ .' " ,..; (11(,\ TREJO : ~ \: 1,;\f'I:';' ;'~:)~I'iJ(jl;!:t ';",;l.!t,~ ""ii, ,'" :'[)':1 ~ '''' ,,,,,,,. ;."" S v""'..r'_",.J","'~'\I'VV'v,,-vV'.~ Ap and ow ounty Attorney R~mmend Appr. ~~ ~ ~rumbi e, MPA Director Collier County Housing and Human Services Jeffr Chie *** OR: 4334 PG: 1233 *** EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 163, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 13427 Gemmer Road, Naples, Florida 34114 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type oflmpact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee J. Water Impact Fee K. Sewer Impact Fee TOTAL IMPACT FEES J AK Approved _/_1_ Amount Owed $100.59 $62.08 $368. I 8 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $410.00 $171.61 $3,415.00 $3,515.00 $19,372.46 16D3 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 D 4 TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the [~oard OHicc The completed routing slip and original documents aTe to be Il)rwardcd to the Board Office only after the Hoard has wkcll actioll 0111hc item) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. Ifthe document is already complete with the rth d r h h r #1 h h #4 I I h kl d" d S F.l (r #5) exception 0 e Chairman's sIgnature, raw a me t mugr routmg mes t rougt , comp elc tIC c ec 1St, an orwar to ue I son me Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routing order) I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service rf- 2/2-,1)' 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman '5 signature are to be delivered to the BeC office only after the BCC has acted to approve the item.) Name of Primary Staff Contact Agenda Date [tern was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336 16D "y Yes (Initial) N/A (Not A licable) Agenda Item Number Number of Original ocuments Attached -:U -Il -1t- ,*c Y.. n/a I. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, musl be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk 10 the Board and ossibly State Officia]s.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all olher arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on Ihe appropriate pages indicaling where the Chairman' s si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable. 71- '7JL 2, 3. 4. 5. 6. 1: Forms! County Forms! BCe Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revi~ed 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 Return to 4134091 OR: 4334 PG: 1234 RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL 0111911008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLBRK RBC PEE COPIES 27.00 3.00 \; fir; Frank Ramsey Collier County HHS 3301 E. Tamillmi Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Retn: CLERK TO THB BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BXT 7140 16D4 File# 08-132-IF This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this./8 day of January. 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Antoine Joseph and Saintherese Joseph" (OWNER). collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, Ihe receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impacl Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement. the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2, The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "B." the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twentv Six Thousand Two Hundred Fortv and 68/1 00 Dollars ($26.240.68). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfac1ion of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with Ihe land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interesl in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee. or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written nolice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY OR: 4334 PG: 1235 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordinaJe,6 D 4- or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare thai the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement. plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis unlil paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIE.7NTY, F ORIDA, . By: ::J'fJL'. ~~ TOM HENNING, CHAIRM By:-f'u.u..... ~,,~.Q-(_ Attest ISCllt> )Ierk Ifgqtwe .1.'1 OWNER: Wit1J~f!w J~ Print Name:Jloe. woe V\ \ ~ J /' .,7 4A"l CJ..U4.e; J ~'5t-l/ht Antoine Joseph OWNER: C (d~~ STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Witnesses: //~ Print Name f:)(),;"fljerr-Jp Jo.5e.fl1 Saintherese Joseph 2008, The foregoing Agreement was acknowledged before me this 22f:L. day o(.,>-J)\\uo,'b ' by I?r; 10'''' " /())(j.J1, -t s ~, who is_personally known to me or has pr duced , as proof of identily'. [N~]'i(A7iin() :.~/"" """ , ~..... .-" .,. " ,"li ,.' '. ","\.1'''''\/'\/'1.' V'/,~'" v VVV\/\IV'V'V'\I"V'V , L-L /}~n-/U<.. JL~ Signature of Person Taking AcknoWledgment App and Recommend Approval: Jeffre Chief SSIS tzkow t County Attorney ~~'-P cy Krumbi . PA Director Collier County Housing and Human Services *** OR: 4334 PG: 1236 *** EXHIBIT "A" ,16D4 , t., LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 3, Block 14, Naples Manor Addition, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, pages 67 and 68, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Street Address 5410 Hardee Street, Naples, Florida 34113 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type ofImpact Fee Amount Owed TOTAL IMPACT FEES $100.59 $149.38 $460.23 $935.00 $2,068.00 $8,228.00 $6,359.00 $725.00 $285.48 $3,515.00 $3,415.00 $26,240.68 A. EMS Impact Fee B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee l. Law Enforcement Impact Fee J. Sewer System Impact Fee K. Water System Impact Fee JAK Approved _/ _/_ ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 D 5 TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original documcnt. Original doclIments should be hand delivered to the Board Office. rhe completed routing slip and original documents are to be f()TWarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the rth Ch .. d r h h r # I h h #4 I h h kr d" d S n (r #5) exception 0 e alTman S Signature, raw a me t rougr roullng mes t rougn , complete tee ec 1St, an orwar to ue 1 son me Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routinl! order) l.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service 7t- -'/7~ c>-- ,:_~ 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing infonnation, All original documents needing the BCe Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the BCe office only after the nee has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Staff Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Contact Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document 1m act Fee Deferra Agreement Attached Phone Number Agenda Hem Number Number of Original Documents Attached 252-2336 ]60-<;"' Yes (Initial) N/A(Not A licable) 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Nol App]icable column, whichever is a ro riate. Original documenl has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters. must be reviewed and signed by the Office ofthe County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances. resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other aTties exce t Ihe BCC Chainnan and the Clerk to the Board The Chainnan's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriale pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require fOT\varding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the Bee's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by tbe BCe on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed tbe chan es, if a Iicable. '7r- Tt '-"j' 77"-- ~- '-1-(L.. n/a 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. t? I: Fonns/ County Forms! BeC F'onns/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24,05 Rtturn to 4134092 OR: 4334 PG: 1237 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY. FL 01119/2008 at 01:50FM DWIGHT E, BROCK. CLERK REC FEE COPIES 11.00 3.00 \;; V Frank Ramsey Collier County HilS 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 341 12 Retn: CLERK TO THB BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 7140 File# 08-129-IF 16D5 This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this J 1 day of January, 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Oanielle Alexandre" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: I. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as 'The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "8," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three Hundred Seventy Two and 46/100 Dollars ($19,372.46). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY OR: 4334 PG: 1238 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordina~e,6 D 5 or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. By: 11. fill ~I~:lj,~.c Attest. as.to I ~ Clerk 11",aturt OIl . .. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIE~l)UNTY, LORIDA~ By: ;]'fJt. TOM HENNING, CHAIR Attest: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk ~/ _1.~.' Dani' e Alexan~re OWNER: STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) 2008, The fOnOingAgreement was alknowledged before me this .2:..i... day of by q n""i/" /J IN",,/, r,,-, who is personally known to me or as proof of identity. ~"''''..." ),,;, ", \lJi\\L\ !,(Y{,{\:'~I)I~lrl '~. ..,'c... .) ~ - -\,\<:\'.1-," :i ";'11'.1;',: ~ '\~.-,.,., " - .. . \..'~'i )1"-1..,'.;,.. " , .,"V.r\l\...../'\I\.--\.I'..I'Y,Y\I"VV'J~ 'J Z J. ,-4. //ftU/ : ?>~r ~ Signature of Person Taking Ac wledgment mend Approval: Jeffr Chie zkow nt County Attorney J-J!'O a cy Krumbine, A Director Collier County Housing and Human Services *** OR: 4334 PG: 1239 *** EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 162, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 13431 Gemmer Road, Naples, Florida 34114 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type of Impact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee J. Water Impact Fee K. Sewer Impact Fee TOTAL IMPACT FEES JAK Approved _1_1_ Amount Owed $100.59 $62.08 $368.18 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $410.00 $171.61 $3,415.00 $3,515.00 $19,372.46 1605 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO D 6 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original dncumt;nts should he hand delivered to the Board OHke. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Hoard Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information nceded. If the document is already complete with the excention afthe Chainnan's signature, draw a line throu!:!h routiOl~ lines # 1 throuf!h #4, comnlete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5) Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routincr order) I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service "7t- -;'/,:-' ~ (.-_./ L_." 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval, Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one oCthe addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the BCe Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the BCC has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Staff Contact Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336 16D- (C, Yes (Initial) N/A(Not A licable) Agenda Item Number Number of Original Documents Attached -:ff::. ~ 7J,( '::f-rC n/a I. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initia] the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances. resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements. etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCe approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a Ikable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the Bec office within 24 hours of BCe approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The Couuty Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable. -::4{ ~ 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. I: Forms/ COW1ty Forms/ Bee Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 Return to 4134093 OR: 4334 PG: 1240 RECOPDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL 01/29/2008 at 01:50FM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK REC PEE COFIES 17.00 3.00 /\) \) Frank Ramsey Collier County HHS 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 7140 16D6 File# 08-136-IF This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this 31- day of January, 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Jose 1. Rosas Arroyo and Maria E. Rosas" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "8," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three Hundred Seventv Two and 46/1 00 Dollars ($19.372.46). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY OR: 4334 PG: 1241 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordinal,6 D 6 or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: DWIGHT E. BROC;:K, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, By:C,,-, 1 U. =oJ L-O.C _ :'.Attest as to ~Ierk I11J111t... <MIl. By: . ,zi,h,wlz- 1?C't:/L OWNER: r;idf ~ ~A8 Ii\, e J. Ro s Arroyo '1tesstzrh\M(\ prin~ame \C,/'r\ S:)r(lf\sef\ OWNER: 4J;4'~ t $~ Maria E. Rosas STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) 2008, The foregoing Agreement was acknowledged before me this 3L day of _JO/Il/U.r'tJ ' by 10')" \ F~ 1+ ~ ;,l {,L {..It:., who is personally known to me or has pr duced - as proof of identity. -;~w~' ',\ ( >i~1i~.,';ii_I\: ~r~{~:;? : . <"'W' \h' '.,' : "',""_, ,. ., ',..' "'C "\f'.~".~"'V\"J"/v'",~~~ /J k7PC ~ ~I;:r ~ r Signature of Person Taking Acknowledgment atzkow t County Attorney ]=:J'~~ ~ Marcy Krumbine. MPA Director Collier County Housing and Human Services *** OR: 4334 PG: 1242 *** EXHIBIT" A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 160, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77, inclusive, ofthe Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 13441 Gemmer Road, Naples, Florida 34114 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type ofImpact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee 1. Law Enforcement Impact Fee J. Water Impact Fee K. Sewer Impact Fee TOTAL IMPACT FEES JAK Approved_I_/_ Amount Owed $100.59 $62.08 $368.18 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $410.00 $171.61 $3,415.00 $3,515.00 $19,372.46 16D6 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 16 D ? THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document Original documents should he hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Ofncc only after the l30ard has taken action on the item,) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the . # # h h k exceotion of the Chainnan's sie:nature, draw a line through routing hnes 1 through 4, comolete tee ec list, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routing order) I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service Tf- 7jz ?S 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Staff Frank Ramsey. Housing Manager Contact Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Phone Number Agenda Item Number Number of Original Documents Attached 252-2336 ]6D-l- Yes (Initial) N/A (Not A licab]e) I. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not App]icable column, whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Altorney. This includes signature pages trom ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC oftice within 24 hours ofBCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCe's actions are nullified. Be aWare of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meetiug have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Iicable. '1~ It it " ---+,,- ii' 1-t n/a 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ~- I: Forms/ County Forms! BCC Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 Return to 4134094 OR: 4334 PG: 1243 RECORDED in OFPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL 01/19/1008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK REC PEB 17.00 COPIES 3,00 'i) \J Frank Ramsey Collier County HUS 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROPPICE 4TH PLOOR EXT 1140 ,16fJ? .If File# 08-149-IF This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this ---'-- day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Gabince Fanfan and Monique Willien" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: ]. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall app]y. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three Hundred Seventv Two and 46/100 Dollars ($19,372.46). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall tenninate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner. lessee. tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. ]n the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER. the COUNTY OR: 4334 PG: 1244 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the Ordinance, or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees areJ. 6 D ? then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement. plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. . . BY:~ ~Of . . t as to, t:lerk .,...it,n Oft BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLlIF~JNT~ORIDA' . By: . ~ z~M ~ imNN G, CHAI~ ' Attest: DWIGHT E, BROCK, Clerk ~r,~ print:Wame ~\",,':v(~ <ii Gabt a:fan ~ ' .:' 1 - . , oni Ii len . STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) 2008, The foregoing Agreement was acknqwledg~d before me this ...L..... day of r;hu. "try' ' by (Iu ;'i"I/L, '1 f j..lJ/11 que W. who IS personally known to me or has produced , as proof of identity. ~~V~ ) ..f~.....~:.", !-.;O;,:~L\ :.U:U.-1'RE.IO S ~/. ,1i','1 ,'\L\li:,,;i\,~, ~,I,i;lll'~: ~ "\~')f ,\ <,.:' '.i';:") :-, ',:,,';,'-.! ".' ,1i!!.'\ ~ ) I "" ~ ~ ' ., c """"'\I'\.i"I""",,...IVV'^""'''f\f\i'~ ~ Ignature of Person Taking Ackn' wledgment ---i-l-- .. k" Recommend App oval: -.t. --../ latzkow tant County Attorney Marcy Krumbi e, MPA Director Collier County Housing and Human Services *** OR: 4334 PG: 1245 *** EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 49, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77, inclusive, ofthe Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 13473 Koinonia Drive, Naples, Florida 34114 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type ofImpact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee 1. Law Enforcement Impact Fee J. Water Impact Fee K. Sewer Impact Fee TOTAL IMP ACT FEES JAK Approved _/ ~_ Amount Owed $100.59 $62.08 $368.18 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $410.00 $171.61 $3,415.00 $3,515.00 $19,372.46 16D7 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 1 TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 6 D 8 THE BOARD 01<' COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should bl~ h,llJd delivered to the Board Office. rhe completed routing slip and original documents are to he forwarded to the Board Office only after the noard has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate tor additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exception of the Chainnan's signature, draw a line throup"h routinp lines # I thrOUlTh #4, comnlete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routing order) I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service -:JI- Z{Zr 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Nomlally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one ofthe addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact stafr lor additional or missing information. All original documents needing the BCC Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the BCe office only after the BCC has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Staff Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Contact Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Phone Number Agenda Item Number Number of Original Documents Attached 252-2336 16D-~ Yes (Initial) N/A(Not A Ii cable) 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signedlinitia]ed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairmau. wilh the exceplion of most letters, musl be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages fTom ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts. agreements. etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arlies exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are required. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Fi]son in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCe's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable. ?C. :::tf-. ~ 7-L n/a 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. -...L ~. I....' . -:fi-- 1: Forms/ County Fonus/ Bee Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Rcvised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 Return to 4134095 OR: 4334 PG: 1246 RECORDBD in OPPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. PL 01/19/1008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK REC PEE COPlBS 27.00 3.00 1; \I Frank Ramsey Collier County HHS 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICB 4TH FLOOR EXT 7240 16D8 File# 08-147-IF This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this ----1- day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Zilana Marc" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflicl with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three Hundred Seventv Two and 46/100 Dollars ($ I 9,372.461. Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest. this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person. except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY OR: 4334 PG: 1247 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordinan~, 6 D 8 or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: DWIGHT E. B~OCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER UNTY, LORIDA, . By: il..u..u iLl ~cy.l. .[). C. . , uty Clerk c ~It IS to .Ch<< IMIItl \ .t..... 0lI'1. TOM HENNING, CHAIR By: ~ ~ , In ame~-L)IV ~;O//;J-- OWNER: 3d-O?lfi j{at(~ Zilana Marc OWNER: STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) 2008, The fo!:egoing Agreemel}t was acknowledged before me thi..s ~ day of Fh"IG''1 ' by Z I furta.. /(,(0,,- , who is personally .knuWll 10 me or has produced as proof of identity. ~~fr6 :*,,,.,,,,.e. ,,,.,,,, :; ""-''''Cw\\'~ \, 'j ! ", .~' IL, ; ',",", I 'vv..r.r~""'~".rV'ho' ~...,,',,'~ ..,,"J'.N.'V~~ //. S gnature of Person Taking Ack wledgment /' :1:- Ap and atzkow t County Attorney a cy Krumbine, Director Collier County Housing and Human Services ........0 *** OR: 4334 PG: 1248 *** EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 51, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 13481 Koinonia Drive, Naples, Florida 34114 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type ofImpact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee 1. Water Impact Fee K. Sewer Impact Fee TOTAL IMPACT FEES JAK Approved _1_1_ Amount Owed $100.59 $62.08 $368.18 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $410.00 $171.61 $3,415.00 $3,515.00 $19,372.46 16D8 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE 16D9 Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original docullwnts should be hand delivered ((Jlhe Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Hoard Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the excention of the Chairman's sirmature, draw a line through routin!! lines # 1 through #4, comnJetc the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routincr order) l.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service 7r- 2/2 '( 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMA nON (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the t:vent one of tile addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature arc to be delivered to tile Bee office only alter the BCC has acted to approve the item.) Name of Primary Staff Contacl Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336 16D - Yes (Initial) N/A(Not A Iicable) Agenda Item Number 1m act Fee Deferra] Agreement Number of Original Documents Attached ~- =ti- :1i ':ff n/a 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate, Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been enlered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicaling where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Fi]son in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Iicable. '-1f- ~ 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. I: Forms! County Forms! BCe Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised] .26.05, Revised 2.24.05 Returo to 4134096 OR: 4334 PG: 1249 RECORDED in OFPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL 01/29/2008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK REC PBE 27.00 COPIES 3.00 IV) \; Frank Ramsey Collier County HHS 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Retn- CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTEROPPICE 4TH PLOOR EXT 1140 File# 08-146-IF This spact for recording 16D9 LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this ~ day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Lunel Napoleon" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: I. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "8," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three Hundred Seventy Two and 46/1 00 Dollars ($19,372.46). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY OR: 4334 PG: 1250 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the OrdinanceJ. 6 D 9 or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER C UNTY, F ORIDA, . By: -1)111 ~ j" '~ ~ n.r Attnt a ~ Glerk 110M'" _1. By: . . [log' OWNER: f~ (,79//(~-&--c~/ Lunel Napoleon OWNER: ~:~M P' NameDee.. ::Py-n'? h \ STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) 2008, The foregoing Agree')1ent was acknowledg~d before me this ~ day of r:( 0, Jil~ ' by .Lot] t? / /\!(j '()"!t'~,, '- , who IS personally known to me or has pr uced FL ,0 j. ' as proof of identity. ~JovS'R'tl"Vf~"V ~ ;,.~;tT,;,_ --~nK~.17\T1J'!\1l.1- rRL\O 'F'~-" ,..;.,.",,'" , , ", , .' "-'11 \ ': \'" I' .'~ ,,' .'_, ~ .~~'. ,;,.' ' I. "","" I' ",: I I, ~ ~~'-rl.'V-V'.,i"r..IV~ 4 ;2" ;) . ').;n,z L'!. /. L( .-i::J Signature of Person Taking Acknowfedgment Recom end Approval: latzkow nt County Attorney / <:....-/~ arcy Krumbine, Director Collier County Housing and Human Services -./L -V A *** OR: 4334 PG: 1251 *** EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 52, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 13485 Koinonia Drive, Naples, Florida 34114 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type of Impact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee J. Water Impact Fee K. Sewer Impact Fee TOTAL IMPACT FEES JAKApproved~~/_ Amount Owed $100.59 $62.08 $368.18 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $410.00 $17I.61 $3,415.00 $3,5 I 5.00 $19,372.46 16D9 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 D 1 TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 0 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should he hand delivered lolhe 130md OtTice. The completed rOLlting slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Bonrd Office only after Ihe Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Comptete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the excention of the Chairman's signature, draw a line through routing lines # I through #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5), Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routinQ: order) I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service If-- '7 );"" 5( t:...-' .- "-.- ( 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder afthe original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff fOf additional or missing information. All original documents needing the BCC Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the BCe office only after the BCe has acted to approve the item) Name of Primary Staff Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336 Contacl Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 Agenda Item Number ]60-\ C Aooroved bv the BCC Type of Document ~tf~e Defe'3:1~ement Number of Original I Attached _IlL. " J Documents Attached I. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages ITom ordinances. resolutions, elc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages fTom contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Fi]son in the BCC office within 24 hours of Bee approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the Bee's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 02/1212008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Iicable. Yes (fnilial) N/A(Not A Ii cable) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. -:1(_ ~/:> -ilL ~ '=fL. nla j-iL. '7fI- I: Forms/ County Forms/ BeC Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 Return to 4134097 OR: 4334 PG: 1252 RECORDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. PL 01/19/1008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT B, BROCK. CLERK REC PEE COPIES 17.00 3.00 'Y) \, Frank Ramsey Collier County HHS 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR EXT 1240 16DIQ File# 08-130-IF This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this .2.1.. day of January, 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Vida Trainie Baltazard" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged. the Parties agree as follows: I. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impacl fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the etfective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three Hundred Seventv Two and 46/1 00 Dollars ($19,372.46). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of tive percent (5%) per annum. but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibil "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land. and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law. regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner. lessee, tenant. mortgagee, or other person. except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County laxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of Ihis AgreemenI's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement. and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to Ihe OWNER. the COUNTY OR: 4334 PG: 1253 . I . II h' t' . d f' I t' h' h 0 d1 6 D 10 may, at tts so e optIOn, co ect t e tmpact ee amount In e au t as set ort In t e r Inance, or bring a civil aclion to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs. incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus inlerest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: DWIGHT E.13ROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLL~OI~~^: B ~ ' ~I y: ~' L)') ---,..: HEN NO, CHAI~~ By:Jj U.U ~/*. tJ-u..,OL- , Attest .s~, t C~erk IttNtwt .1" OWNER: .~ // -If. ' /:x:;~7 04/ Vida Trainie Baltaza;t? OWNER: Witn~ss.\rX 14 ~ ~/1M Print Name I j iI. 'l (')Q M <R )> STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Thelotegoing 2008, by V, ir- ent was \ll(knowledged before me this ;;? ~ay of ,\1\- V ( , who is personally known to me or as proof of identity. \b,'''," r---. ,)'Iy f'U, '";":.J"\i'\rV'Jv'v'V,,. .o\....~q:j!plRljlHJ SBJXfJj.\' <J\t;yl." .11 ((l',I'd'\\!IJ\ 1)11' ',,~,; ~:. -~'(,).."c/r ,\:'1,,' \,;',;. n ture of Person Taking Acknowledgment 1-ll'~P.."(f,; latzkow tant County Attorney :r'"' A:rA ~ ../Marcy Krumbin, PA Director Collier County Housing and Human Services *** OR: 4334 PG: 1254 *** EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 164, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 13423 Gemmer Road, Naples, Florida 34114 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type oflmpact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee B. Correctional Facilities Impacl Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee l. Law Enforcement Impact Fee J. Water Impact Fee K. Sewer Impact Fee TOTAL IMP ACT FEES JAK Approved ~/ ~/ ~ 16D10 Amount Owed $100.59 $62.08 $368.18 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $410.00 $171.61 $3,415.00 $3.515.00 $19,372.46 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 D 1 TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 1 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original doculllent Original documents should he hand delivered 10 the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only aftl'r the [~oard has taken action on the item,) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exccotion of the Chairman's signature, draw a line throu!!h routim~ lines # I through #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5) Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routine order) I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service -Ii- ZllY e- 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3_ 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summaI)'. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the BeC Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the BCe office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Staff Contacl Agenda Date Item was A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336 ]6D-q Yes (Initial) NIA (Not A licable) 02/26/2008 Agenda Item Number 1i- 1ft '--;'fi lt' nla i~~rral Agreement Number of Original Documents Attached 7i. ~ I. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initia] the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a fO riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages lTom ordinances. resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except Ihe BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossib]y State Officia]s.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time lTame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines' The document was approved hy the Bee on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable. I: Fonns! County Forms! Bee Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1,26.05, Revised 2.24.05 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. '7 \; Return to 4134098 OR: 4334 PG: 1255 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY. FL 01/1911008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK REC PEE 17.00 COPIBS 3.00 Frank Ramsey Collier County HHS 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples. Florida 34112 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROmCB 4TH FLOOR EXT 7240 16D 11 File# 08-142-IF This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this _2, I day of January, 2007, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Jacqueline Jules" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Two Hundred Seventv Four and 83/] 00 Dollars ($19,274.83). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY OR: 4334 PG: 1256 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordinlcP D 11 or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: DWIGHT E. BROck, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, By:,:..llu..u ~.Q.(,. Atttlt as to C I Y Clerk i fgMtlII't 0111- By: w~esses: /\ 1\. _ /I '::f ~~ Print Name M.o....-I-Wt. .j\;lll4raetb OWNER: tJar dill e. /, N ~ JU I~g Jacqueline Jules ~~. cl:t=~ i ameJt'JIo\l"- (~Vl..f-,^- STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) OWNER: 2008, regoing Agreeme t was acknowledged before me this ..2J.L day OfJ ~ , who is personally known to me has as proof of Identity. pn~!u;;ed [NOTARIAL SEAL O'~'"O'" AGNES ME~~ <Wi. MY COMMlSSlON. 2 2010 ES septemhel'\ , oJ>, 'if EXPIR: SCOU"I,0\s5OC.CO. ""loOf'f'-o:!'" Fl.NotaryDi 1_11(~1.:\.N01ARY Jeffr Chief orm Reco mend Approval: i / ~ arcy Krumbi Director Collier County Housing and Human Services ~:.o ,MPA *** OR: 4334 PG: 1257 *** EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION 16D 11 Lot 142, Independence, Phase II-A, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 43, Pages 64 through 66, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 1512 Peace Way, Immokalee, Florida 34142 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type of Impact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee Amount Owed TOT AL IMPACT FEES $100.59 $113.53 $460.23 $935.00 $2.068.00 $8,228.00 $6,359.00 $725.00 $285.48 $19,274.83 B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee 1. Law Enforcement Impact Fee JAK Approved ~ _1_ ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE l6Dl2 Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documellts should be hand deli....ered to the Board Offlcc. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the excention of the Chairman's sip-nature, draw a line through routing lines # I through #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routine order) I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service ?YL ;/;iy 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Staff Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Contact Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Phone Number Agenda Item Number Number of Original Documents Attached 252-2336 ]6D-1 z... Yes (Initial) N/A (Not A licable) 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initia] the Yes column or mark UN/A" in the Not Applicab]e column. whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters. must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages trom ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages trom contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials,) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Fi]son in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable. 11- <;4/ IIL- ~ 11 Y'-- n/a 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 11-- I: Forms/ County Forms/ Bee Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 0;, \I Return to 4134099 OR: 4334 PG: 1258 RECORDED in OPPICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. PL 01119/1008 at 01:10PM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC PEB 11.00 COPIES 3.00 Frank Ramsey Collier County "US 3301 Eo Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROmCB 4TH FLOOR EXT 7140 16D12 File# 08-138-IF This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this 3L day of January, 2007, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Jose Angel Olvera and Nora Beatriz Olvera" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four Hundred Fortv Two and 52/100 Dollars ($12,442.52). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY OR: 4334 PG: 1259 16D12 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the Ordinance, or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: , DWIGHTE. BROCK, Clerk BY:~~ rl~~ MtWL IS to ~1(.e ty perk If9lllt..... onl- By: ~~ 0Aa.rb Print Name ~ ~ A.l.oIt:lr~ OWNER: :r osG Af\<jel Olvef"q Jose Angel Olvera OWNER: ~C\ fudN~CUvq Nora Beatriz Olvera ST ATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) 2008, Th~of~greemeqt)Vas acknowledged before me this :3.L day of by ~ 8t"'J;~ who IS personal as roof of identity. , d [NOT ....~ AGNES MENDOZA ....:uJ~ M.Y COMMISSION # OD594447 ~p EXPIRe.',S",_'Z.ZOIO "'O!'f',<+"". f1LNllWYDilCOUJltAs:;oc.Co. 1(1:-.' oMt App and 1 Recommend Approv J effre Chief C--/ Y Krumbine, MPA Director Collier County Housing and Human Services ~\ '-P *** OR: 4334 PG: 1260 *** EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION 16D12 Lot 19, Liberty Landing, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 47, Pages 71 through 73, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 3592 Liberty Way, Immokalee, FL 34142 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type of Impact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee Amount Owed B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee $100.59 $62.14 $368.18 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $410.00 $171.61 C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee 1. Law Enforcement Impact Fee TOT AL IMPACT FEES $12,442.52 JAK Approved .._/._1_ ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP.16 TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO D 13 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print all pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should he hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be Jilr\varded to the Board Office only arter the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or infonnation needed. If the document is already complete with the exceotioll of the Chairman's si!'!nature, draw a line throue:h routimzlines # 1 throullh #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routinl7 order) I.Frank: Ramsey Housing and Human Service # ?/?fS 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. . 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee ehaimlan 's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item.) Name of Primary Staff Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336 Contact Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 Agenda Item Number 160-1.7., Aooroved bv the BCC Type of Document Impf'it ~e Deferral Agreement N umber of Original I Attached Documents Attached J I. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column. whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by tbe Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chainnan and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uircd. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines' The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable. Yes (Initial) N/A(Not A licable) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1i ':Itt- :r-re 7IC n/a ';fL I: Formsl County Forms! Bee Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 Return to 4134100 OR: 4334 PG: 1261 RECORDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY. FL 01/19/2008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLBRK REC PEE 17.00 COPIES 3.00 '1] V Frank Ramsty Collitr County HHS 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Retn: CLBRK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICB 4TH FLOOR EXT 7140 16D13 File# 08-148- IF This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this .1.- day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Islaine Georges" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: I. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "8." the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three Hundred Seventv Two and 46/1 00 Dollars ($ I 9.372.46). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY OR: 4334 PG: 1262 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the orla6eD 13 or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. BY:~. t~~lAOL- ,",It as to I ulY Clerk 11",aturt 00 r. , . . Attest: DWIGHT E. BROCK.Slerk TOM HENNI G, CHAIRM By: ~stM Print Name~forhl OWNER: WJ~v~ Q~ Islaine Georges OWNER: STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) 2008, The forel!oi~g Agreement was acknowledg~d before me this ---L- day of r: bnJ<"-'i ' by j.-, IQf/I~ (/(L"(4~-> , who IS personally known to me or has produced . as proof of identity. ~~16 :* \i','{J\:\1i<,1\,,\;iil1:'jU:';' ~ '>~'?". . ~"'"' <. i ;!I.: -', ,:"::",:,":., . ....,r.~....V\,I'V'.... "..v.,/vv-.r./V'V"V"J"I.^I'\' 2, , -; " , ~ .?I')n?/'/ .. /b/. ;/;;,AJ Signature of Person Taking Acknowledgment form Rec .....P latzkow nt County Attorney Marcy Krumbine, Director Collier County Housing and Human Services *** OR: 4334 PG: 1263 *** EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 50, Trail Ridge, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 44, Pages 71 through 77, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 13477 Koinonia Drive, Naples, Florida 34114 EXHIBIT "B" IMP ACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type ofImpact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee J. Water Impact Fee K. Sewer Impact Fee TOTAL IMPACT FEES JAKApproved~/_/_ 16D13 Amount Owed $100.59 $62.08 $368. I 8 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $410.00 $171.61 $3,4 I 5.00 $3,5 I 5.00 $19,372.46 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 16 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE . D 14 Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original docurncnts should he hand Jclivcrcd to the Buard Oflkc The completed routmg slip and llnglllal documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the r~oard has l<:lkcn action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. lethe document is already complete with the exception of the Chairman's signature, draw a line through routing lines # I through #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5) Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routing order) I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service 11-. Zf-7 f: 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature arc to be delivered to the Bee office only atter the BCC has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Staff Contact Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336 16D -It.j Yes (Initial) N/A(Not Ap licable) Agenda Item Number Number of Original Documents Attached 11- 1L 7/-, n/a lmp 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exceplion of most letters, musl be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances. resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed hy all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossib] State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a lieable. "1-1-- ~ 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. I: Formsl County Formsl BeC Fanusl Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 l) V 4134101 OR: 4334 PG: 1264 RECORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL 02/19/1008 at 01:50FM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK REC PEE COPIES 17.00 3,00 Return to Retn: CLBRK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 7140 J14 "'rank Ramsey Collier County HHS 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 File# 08-082- IF This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this j~ day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Minouche Carilus" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date ofthe transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "8," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four Hundred Forty Two and 46/100 Dollars ($12,442.46). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY OR: 4334 PG: 1265 may, at its sole option, collect the impact tee amount in default as set forth in the 0~n&1J 14 l!\f or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deterred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: DWIGHT E. BROCK;Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO NTY, FLORIDA, z/,7 (.f~ 't BY:_~ ~~o.c. at.tnt IS lfrk ,tOft.tlIrt 001- By: G, CHAIRM Witnesses: \.(Y\~ G~ Print Name f\Ac. r*ha \ \J cu'a...d 0 OWNER: A';W7,Uk W~&I) Minouche Carilus - t'""" ~ ' . -qAA . in~me Y; J '. AA'/k STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) OWNER: 2008, s acknowledged before me this -4-- day of 9~~ who is personally known to me or has prod ed as proof of identity. App and I [NOTARIAL SEAL] AGNES MENDOZA MY COMMISSION # 00594447 EXPIRES: Sq>tembcr 12, 2010 l.NOtaryDiscount~Co. ledgment Recommend Appr val: l i J effre Chief .Kl tz W sista t County Attorney arcy Krumbine Director Collier County Housing and Human Services Jl-o PA -P '. *** OR: 4334 PG: 1266 *** EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 26, Liberty Landing, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 47, Pages 71 through 73, inclusive, ofthe Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 3624 Justice Circle, Immokalee, FL 34142 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type ofImpact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee 8. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee TOTAL IMPACT FEES JAKApproved~~_ Amount Owed $100.59 $62.08 $368.18 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $410.00 $171.61 $12,442.46 16D14 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIt 6 D 15 TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should he hand delivered 10 the Board Office The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only !!Jter the Board has taken action on the item,) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the excention of the Chainnan's signature, draw a line throuRh routine: lines # 1 throue:h #4, comolete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routinlJ order) l.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service T/- Z/z 'K 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact infonnation is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature arc to be delivered to the BeC office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item.) Name of Primary Staff Contact Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336 160-1'5" Yes (Initial) NIA (Not A lieable) Agenda Item Number Number of Original Documents Attached -p /1'- Ti.. ,#-.. nla I. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column. whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman. with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossih] State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to Ihe Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the Bee's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed tbe chan es, if a licable. R 11--. ~ , 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. I: Forms! County Forms! Bee Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03,04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24,05 V "J - Return to Frank Ramsey Collier County HDS 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples. Florida 34112 4134102 OR: 4334 PG: 1267 RBCORDED in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL 01119/1008 at 01:50FM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK REC m 17.00 coms 3.00 File# 08-139-IF Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICB 4TH FLOOR EXT 7140 16015 This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this lLday of January, 2007, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Samuel Trejo and Rebecca Castro" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four Hundred Fortv Two and 46/100 Dollars ($12,442.46). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a releasc or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY OR: 4334 PG: 1268 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in t~ o~iflml, 5 or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk By:- ~ fjt~O 4_C.( , eput lerk MtHt as to CM /I, .tgllturt 001- By: OWNER: Witnesses: Y"\'\.o.JL. (ll,:,~ Print Name Mo('~.... 14\1/4{'4Jo .f#H7bt/ Samuel Trejo , r~l') ~~ U e cca Castro STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) [NOT AIU .~ - .LJ~' MY COMMISSION # 00594447 ,,'fi/fIi'A WIRES' S",_12.2010 '..,C>>'~ FIl'lm..,D1IClJ,1l1IAstiOC.Co. OlJ.J.NOTARY . owledged before me this .x.. day of dlf,c,..y , ho is personally know III me or has produced as proof of identity The 2008, by Reco end Appro 1: ~ 4" latzkow tant County Attorney Marcy Krumbine, MPA Director Collier County Housing and Human Services *** OR: 4334 PG: 1269 *** EXHIBIT" A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 27, Liberty Landing, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 47, Pages 71 through 73, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 3628 Justice Circle, Immoka1ee, FL 34142 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type of Impact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee 1. Law Enforcement Impact Fee TOTAL IMPACT FEES JAK Approved ---.J.-! ~ 16D15 Amount Owed $100.59 $62.08 $368.18 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $410.00 $171.61 $12,442.46 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO D 16 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original docllment. Original docul1lents should be hand delivered to the Board Otllce. The completed routing slip and original documents arc to be t()fwarded to the Board Office only after the f-3oard has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exceotion of the Chairman's sie:nature, draw a line through routino lines # I through #4, comolete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routing order) I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service 7ff-. ?/Z~ 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONT ACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder afthe original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Staff Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Contacl Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Phone Number Agenda Item Number Number of Original Documents Attached 252-2336 ]6D-ILo Yes (Initial) NIA (Not A licable) 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate, Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency, (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office oflhe County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines! The doeument was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Iicable. it ~ 7i ~ nla 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7i "7i---- I: Forms! County Forms! Bee Fonns/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised ].26.05, Revised 2.24.05 /'\..." f \ \;' Return to 4134103 OR: 4334 PG: 1270 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL 01/19/1008 at 02:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLBRK REC PEE COPIES 27.00 3.00 Frank Ramsey Collier County HIlS 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 File# 08-140-IF Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEP.OmCE 4TH FLOOR EXT 1140 16D16 This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this ~ day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Emmanuel Louimare" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A" 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four Hundred Forty Two and 46/100 Dollars ($12.442.46). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Af,'reement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY OR: 4334 PG: 1271 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordiff?e, D 16 or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIE~~~Y'F RIDA,. By: .:J'fJI- TOM HENNING, CHAIR By;1).J..UJ.... ~tU LaC Attest as to . ~lerk .tlNtutt GIll ~ Witnesses: '-'\i \Qd if', C~L.'("c< olc, Print Name ~\C'I~Ir,'" -A Ivo, ,,,,,L OWNER: ~rn--=<<?Z /,y"L ~~ mmanuel Louimare wi~se~: . / ) + ~eA t.] ~';-I~~4-"-M.. STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) 2008, ~:~i,~~;:tZ~~:s a~~:~~g~~ b~:~~~n~~vth~i1t~a:~f bed -asproof of i denti ty. OWNER: Q ~y COMMISSION 'DDS92~1~ ~ EXPIRES: September \2. Co ~OFf\.~ Fl,NOIal)'DIS(;OUlIIAzsOC.' 1.jl(~I.,_NOTAllS Appr and 1 tzkow sist t County Attorney cy Krumbine, Director Collier County Housing and Human Services -- *** OR: 4334 PG: 1272 *** EXHIBIT" A" 16D16 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 30, Liberty Landing, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 47, Pages 71 through 73, inclusive, ofthe Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 3640 Justice Circle, Immokalee, FL 34142 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type of Impact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee Amount Owed TOTAL IMPACT FEES $100.59 $62.08 $368.18 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $410.00 $171.61 $12,442.46 B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee 1. Law Enforcement Impact Fee JAK Approved -.! --.!_ ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIPl TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 6 D 17 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Oflicc. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dales, and/or information needed. lethe document is already complete with the exceotion of the Chairman's sillIlature, draw a line throue.h TOuting lines # 1 through #4, comolete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routinv order) l.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service 7f-- z/2 r- 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder afthe original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature arc to be delivered to the BCe office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Staff Contact Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336 l6D_I:t Yes (Initial) N/A (Not A licable) Agenda l1em Number Number of Original Documents Attached 11L '"TI- 1~ ,( 7L n/a I. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column. whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by lhe Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by lhe Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except lhe BCC Chairman and Clerk to lhe Board and ossibl State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all olher arties exce t lhe BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval ofthe document or lhe final ne otiated contract date whichcver is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or lhe BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Ijcable. 7/lL- 1: Forms! County Forms/ Bce Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Return to 4134104 OR: 4334 PG: 1273 RECORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. F1 01/19/1008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E, BROCK. CLERK REC PEE COPIES 17.00 3.00 ~ V Frank Ramsey Collier County HHS 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 File# 08-153-IF Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 7140 26D17 This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this ~ day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Passiana Belizaire" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four Hundred Forty Two and 46/100 Dollars ($12,442.46). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY OR: 4334 PG: 1274 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordin~c~ D 1 7 or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: , " DWIGHT E. BROCK:, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIERYUNTY, F ORIDA,. By: :J'fft JIft TOM HENNING, CHAI By: ~Clt.u 1 ~r- {'Ie . , D ty Clerk Att.Jt, as to . I nun ~ Itgutur'e 001- " OWNER: '~711 S"J ";J d'1t Passiana Belizaire i =;,;:'th/JI ([3' OWNER: Witnesses; 0 d. =-1y~~,~~^~> Print ame ',. (l)YalJ- STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) 2008, The foregoing Agreement was acknowledged before me this M day of 4.AAA..-:iGfe: ' ~~ "A~IJ"" ']\ e, If'"A I ,who is personally known to me or has pro ed as proof of identity. OTARIAL SEAL] #!'''''' VIRGINIA CANW );J. MY COMMISSION' D0594425 ~ EXPIRES, SqlladNr 12. 2010 I NOTARY FJ,Notay[)bQgtAa1:.Co. Appro d s form and Si Jeffrey Chief A Reco mend Approval: cy Krumbi ,MPA Director Collier County Housing and Human Services ""p *** OR: 4334 PG: 1275 *** EXHIBIT "A" 16 D 17 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 35, Liberty Landing, according to tbe plat tbereof, as recorded in Plat Book 47, Pages 7] through 73, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 3660 Justice Circle, Immokalee, FL 34]42 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type ofImpact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee Amount Owed TOTAL IMPACT FEES $100.59 $62.08 $368.18 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $410.00 $171.61 $12,442.46 E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee 1. Law Enforcement Impact Fee JAK Approved-1_/_ ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 n TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 18 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the excention of the Chairman's sit:mature, draw a line throuoh routimllines # ] through #4, comnlete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5), Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routinp' order) I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service 4- Z[z '?" 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder afthe original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact infonnation is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact statffor additional or missing information. All original documents needing the BCC Chainnan'5 signature arc to be delivered to the BCe office only after the BCe has acted to approve the item. Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336 16D -I. Yes (Initial) N/A (Not A licable) 02/26/2008 Agenda Item Number 11--. '7i 7-L '7-/-. 7tt- n/a act Fee Deferral Agreement Number of Original Documents Attached -w-- 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicab]e column. whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibly State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a Ii cable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC oflice within 24 hours ofBCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a [icable. I: Fonns! County Fonus/ BCe Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised J .26.05, Revised 2.24,05 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Return to 4134105 OR: 4334 PG: 1276 RBCORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL 01/19/1008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK REC PEE 17.00 COPIES 3.00 {'l Frank Ramsey Collier County HHS 3301 E. Tamjaml Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Retn CLBRK TO THE BOARD INTEROmCB 4TH FLOOR EXT 7140 16D18 File# 08-144-IF This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this -L day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Jose Penaloza Jasso and Aracely Penaloza" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four Hundred Forty Two and 46/100 Dollars ($12,442.46). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 D TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 19 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the excention afthe Chairman's sionature, draw a line throuoh routing lines # 1 throuoh #4, comn!ete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). ~oute to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date List in routine: order) l.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service -%- 7/2 'is 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Staff Contact Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336 160 -19 Yes (Initial) N/A(Not A licable) Agenda Item Number ct Fee Deferral Agreement . lD Number of Original Documents Attached 1i- 'TI-- 7-;L. =tt.. 71- nla I. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chainnan, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chainnan and Clerk to the Board and ossib]y State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chainnan's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the document or the tinal ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriale pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contra~ts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Fi]son in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCe's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable. ~. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. I: Forms/ County Forms! Bee Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised] .26.05, Revised 2.24.05 /y) \; Return to 4134106 OR: 4334 PG: 1279 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 01/19/2008 at 01:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK REC PEE COPIES 27.00 3.00 Frank Ramsey Collier County HHS 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 File# 08-081-IF Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 7240 16D19 This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this -I-- day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Miguel Angel Gaspar Francisco" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four Hundred Forty Two and 46/100 Dollars ($12.442.46). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or o1her security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY OR: 4334 PG: 1280 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordin~~ D 19 or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: DWIGHT E: BROCK, Clerk ~- . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER C UNTY, F ORillA, . By~: It.u...ti ~O.(. Attut as "t- perk .1...... 0111- By: Witnesses: '-\,\o.u~(, 0. Q.vr:.^ts"d.c.. Print Name ~\C\ c \-\'0- \ v (.lInn" OWNER: iJ1~ ~~1 ~t:r Migue Angel Gaspar Franci 0 OWNER: STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Th~o~~ent was ~wledged before me this -1- day of ~, 2008, by ~ ~ ~" who is personally known ~o me or has pr uced -as proof of IdentIty. . owledgment Q MYCOMMISSION'DDS9441~ ~ EXPIRE:'> ~-o1<<nber12.20 'OI-r:/ P\.t<lQliI'Yi)lljG(I'.lnl~CO. L'-':Io)4'lOTAAY .L~ Appro and Ie Jeffre Chief A arcy Krumbine, Director Collier County Housing and Human Services *** OR: 4334 PG: 1281 *** EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION l6D19 Lot 22, Liberty Landing, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 47, Pages 71 through 73, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 3608 Justice Circle, Immokalee, FL 34142 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type ofImpact Fee Amount Owed A. EMS Impact Fee B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee l. Law Enforcement Impact Fee TOTAL IMPACT FEES $100.59 $62.08 $368.18 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $410.00 $171.61 $12,442.46 JAK Approved ___I_j_ ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 D2 "". TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO C THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should he hand delivered to the Board Offke. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item,) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the excention of the Chairman's silYnature, draw a line throuQh routing lines # 1 throup"h #4, comnlete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). ~oute to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date List in routin'" order) I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service fi- Z/Zr 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be deljvered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Staff Contact Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336 16D -"2.-0 Yes (Initial) N/A (Not A licable) Agenda Item Number Number of Original Documents Attached '1L n1a 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column. whichever is a ro riate, Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters. must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages fTom ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sigh here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 02/1212008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable. Tt- 71--. I: Fonns! County Forms! Bce Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Return to 4134107 OR: 4334 PG: 1282 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL 02/29/2008 at 02:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK REC FEE 27.00 COPIES 3.00 \;7 Frank Ramsey ColUer County HHS 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 File# 08-141-IF Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR ElT 7240 16 D 20 This space for recording LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this -I- day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Jean Vital Astreide and Marie Astreide" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: I. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing of the dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four Hundred Forty Two and 52/1 00 Dollars ($12.442.52). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY OR: 4334 Pl: 1283 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the ordinan~, D 20 or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: .. DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO NTY, FL RillA, By:_Cl.t.t.u. Jf/~J'(),(' -u.._-t' ., uty Clerk ft~~.' Ch4 t .ttHtwt 0lI1- By: Witnesses: '-....\.'{\(M :I; ii, OJ.! , '. n , o..J- Print Name \-.\0\ \'N>. A \Jurc-,l, OWNER: '~ ~ \l. fI-/J t~o1C^- Jean Vital Astreide OWNER: +- Marie Astreide STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) ged before me this 1 day of ~ is personally known to me or has pro ced as pr f of identity. [NOTARIAL SEAL , 'ENDOZA AGNES lV' 0594441 MY COMM\SSlON~~\2, 20\0 EXP\RES'.sevte:\1 \~Co. f\-:I f\.l'lClIa>1J:hsC01'" , Jeffre . K zkow Chief A ist t County Attorney ...R ar Krumbine, Director Collier County Housing and Human Services *** OR: 4334 PG: 1284 *** EXHIBIT "A" 16 D 20 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 10, Liberty Landing, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 47, Pages 71 through 73, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 3556 Liberty Way, Immokalee, FL 34142 EXHIBIT "8" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type of Impact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee Amount Owed B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee $100.59 $62.14 $368.18 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $410.00 $171.61 C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee TOTAL IMPACT FEES $12,442.52 JAK Approved __i_l_ ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 1 6 TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO D 21 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be lorwarcted to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the excention of the Chairman's sip-nature, draw a line throul!h routing: lines # I throuQ"h #4, comnlete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5), Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routina order) l.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service %- Z-/ Z-K' 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval, Normal1y the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the BeC Chairman's signature arc to be delivered to the BCC office only after the BCe has acted to approve the item.' Name of Primary Staff Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336 Contact Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 Agenda Item Number 16D_2[ Annroved bv the BCC Type of Document ~~~ Agreement Number of Original I Attached Documents Attached 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/ A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chainnan, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages /Tom ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages /Tom contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chainnan and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chainnan and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval ofthe document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chainnan's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of Bce approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time /Tame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! Tbe document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all cbanges made during tbe meeting bave been incorporated in the attached document. Tbe County Attorney's Office has reviewed tbe cban es, if a licable. Yes (Initial) NIA (Not A licable) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 71-- '{i. q-L ~ '#- nla --:1L I: Formsl County Formsl BCC Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 OR: 4334 PG: 1285 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 02/29/2008 at 02:50PM D~IGHT E, BROCK. CLERK REC PEE coms \;1; 4134108 Return to Frank Ramsey HHS 3301 ~ Tamiami Trail Naplf:'!, FL 34HZ Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR This spa~JVrJJ!.Qg File# 08-119-IF LIEN AGREEMENT WITH DEVELOPER FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this ~ day of January, 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Freeman and Freeman, Ioe:' (DEVELOPER). collectively stated as the "Parties:' NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from issuance of this Agreement until six (6) months after issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the dwelling unit(s). 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon the sale of the dwelling unit(s), unless the dwelling units are sold to households meeting the criteria set forth in the Ordinance, and the impact fees are duly deferred. As set forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three Hundred Five and 88/100 Dollars ($19.305.88). 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A;' which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit(s). The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed from. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any O\~mer, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same, including, but not limited to. a full or partial release of lien. 7. In the event the DEVELOPER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the DEVELOPER, a delinquency fee equal to ten percent (10%) of the total impact fee imposed shall be assessed, and the COUNTY may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default and assessment as set forth in the Ordinance, or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or Page I 01"2 27.00 3,00 16 D 21 OR: 4334 PG: 1286 declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar day basis until paid. DEVELOPER will sell the unit to persons whose legal status will be verified. documented and kept on file at the otT1ce of Housing and Human Services. If the developer fails to comply with the tenns of the agreement, or the unit ceases to be utilized for affordable housing, or is not sold to legal residents. the full amount of deferred impact fees shall be immediately repaid to the County, including all applicable interest and penalties. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the DEVELOPER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk SIONERS By: _lLu-u ~~_oLIlY ~It IS to 1 tyflerk S19Hturt 0111 ~ Dev~D~', ,-~ ""'-7 Witnesses: 2 :tZ~ Pri~f!::,54 a :k:~/ :l n " e J By: ~reeman ~ 'rn ~ Title: President Print N~~fU'.J. J1i,'J~ STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The toregoing instrumcntAgreement was acknowledged before me this ~ day of January, 2008, by Ernest Freeman~sident for Freeman and Freeman, Inc. who is personally known to me or has produced ~ ~ identification. . /J [NOTARIAL SEAL] ~_iU. &JC<d {l{. 'tL-o-- (Signature OfJfJotj Public) !l{/~f J Il V' (. /l1. ' (Print Name of Notary Public) MARGARET M. lEE NOTARYPUBuc. STAT! OF FlORIDA COMMISSION # OD305112 EXPIRES 6129/2008 8ONOED THRlJ 1-JV\!l-M'lTA:I1Y, /.. (..-e- ~\ - Marcy Krumbine, irector of Housing & Human Services Page2of2 7.~ D21 Wi *** OR: 4334 PG: 1287 *** EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section 33, Township 46S, Range 29E Comm NE Cr of Lot 20 Blk 29 New Market Subd, Thence NELY alg N Ii of Escambia St., Extended 80 ft to E Bdy Li of Madison Ave to POB, Thence alg N Bdy Li of Escambia 300ft, NWL Y & Parell with Madison Ave 500ft to S Li of F1ager St. Ext, SWL Y alg E Bdy Li of Flager St. 300 ft to intersect of Flager St. & Madison Ave. SELY alg E Bdy Li of Madison Ave 500ft to NLY Bdy Li of Escambia to POB, less OR 375 pg 141, OR 374 pg 292, OR 374 pg 310, OR 374 pg 298, OR 376 pg 674, OR 374 pg 141, OR 374 pg 304, OR 316 pg 161, OR 402 pg 510-511, OR 402 pg 505, OR 402 pg 493-494, OR 402 pg 487-488, OR 567 pg 799, Collier County, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 303 Calle Amistad Street, Immokalee, Florida 34142 EXHIBIT "'B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type of Impact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee Amount Owed $100.59 $144.58 $460.23 $935.00 $2.068.00 $8.228.00 $6,359.00 $725.00 $285.48 $19,305.88 B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee TOTAL IMPACT FEES JAKApproved_/_I_ J 5 D 21 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 1 6 D 2 2 TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Ollice, The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exccntion of the Chairman's sip-nature, draw a line through routing lines # I through #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in roulin!! order) l.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service 7?-- Z/zrt 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office (The primary contact is the holder afthe original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact infonnation is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing infonnation. All original documents needing the BeC Chairman's signanue are to be delivered to the BeC office only after the BCe has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Staff Contact Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro nate. I. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.) 2. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board 3. The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. 4. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. 5. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. -:::L/ Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain ./ f--- time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! 6. The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during .the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable. PRIMARY CONT ACT INFORMATION Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number Agenda Item Number Fee Deferral Agreement Number of Original Documents Attached 252-2336 16D - Z,z.. Yes (Initial) 11--- TR- nla 1: Fonns/ County Forms/ Bee Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 4134109 1"7 V Return to OR: 4334 PG: 1288 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 02/29/2008 at 02:10PM D~IGHT E. BROCK, CLERK RE C FEE COPIES 27,00 3.00 Frank Ramsey HHS 3301 E Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR ,,",p.J!Ul,!&. 1 6 D 2 2 LIEN AGREEMENT WITH DEVELOPER FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this Z.1~y of January, 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Freeman and Freeman, Inc," (DEVELOPER). collectively stated as the "Parties:' NOW. THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of File# 08-135-IF Collier County. Florida. known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event afany conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from issuance of this Agreement until six (6) months after issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the dwelling unit(s). 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon the sale of the dwelling unit(s), unless the dwelling units are sold to households meeting the criteria set forth in the Ordinance, and the impact fees are duly deferred. As set forth in Exhibit "B:' the amount of the deferred impact fees is Nineteen Thousand Three Hundred and 01/100 Dollars ($19.300.0 I). 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit(s). The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned. or otherwise conveyed from. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest. this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements. COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same, including. but not limited to. a full or partial release of lien. 7. In the event the DEVELOPER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the DEVELOPER, a delinquency fee equal to ten percent (10%) of the total impact fee imposed shall be assessed, and the COUNTY may. at its sole option. collect the impact fee amount in default and assessment as set forth in the Ordinance, or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or Page I 01'2 OR: 4334 PG: 1289 declare that the deferred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The 1 6 D 2 2 COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs. incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar day basis until paid. DEVELOPER will sell the unit to persons whose legal status will be verified, documented and kept on tile at the office of Housing and Human Services. If the developer fails to comply with the terms of the agreement, or the unit ceases to be utilized for affordable housing, or is not sold to legal residents, the full amount of deferred impact fees shall be immediately repaid to the County, including all applicable interest and penalties. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the DEVELOPER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk fjrt By: ~ () 1.11 J :t~Lr)~ ~y: . D ty Clerk Attest as to 11'Mt1 S .t...~ CNI1. Witnesses: By: Em reeman Title: President j)LI\ '\bflA STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrumentAgreement was acknowledged before me this ~ day of January, 2008, by Ernest Freeman as President for Freeman and Freeman, Inc. who is personally known to me or has produced M..4 identification. L [NOTARIAL SEAL] (Signature Not"'7 Public) /JIa.rg A. rL f /t1. 1. e. .e..- (Print Name of Notary Public) NOt MARGARET M LEe C~'M~L'C. STATE 0, FlORroA "n~~I~~~~~gg~112 .', '., ','. . <>...,. 'Y"~'!,!?" d A~ ......P . arc Krumbine, Dire t of Housing & Human Services Page 2 of2 *** OR: 4334 PG: 1290 *** EXHIBIT "A" 16D22 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 18, Pine Grove Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 103, Public R<<ords for Collier County, Florida STREET ADDRESS 420 Carver Street, Immokalee, Florida 34142 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type ofImpact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee Amount Owed TOTAL IMPACT FEES $100.59 $138.71 $460.23 $935.00 $2,068.00 $8.228.00 $6.359.00 $725.00 $285.48 $19,300.01 B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee 1. Law Enforcement Impact Fee JAK Approved _/_1 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 1 TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 6 D 2 3 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # I through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exceDtion of the Chairman's si!!:nature, draw a line throue.h routim!: lines # I throu2h #4, comolcte the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date ! (Ust in rautinp' order) I.Frank Ramsey Housing and Human Service -::;t. '"'j-'t e" L 2. Chairman Tom Henning BCC 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact infonnation is needed in the event one of the addressees above. including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the BCe Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the BCe office only after the BeC has acted to approve the item. Name of Primary Staff Contact Agenda Date Item was 02/26/2008 A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column. whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions bave been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. 0/ Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain ; IlG time frame or the BCe's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on 02/12/2008 and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's R Oflice has reviewed the chan es, if a Iicable. Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager Phone Number 252-2336 l6D - 2-=<: Yes N/A(Not (Initial) A licable) :fL. ';fL n1a I: Forms! County Forms! BCC Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 Agenda Item Number Number of Original Documents Attached 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. --.. -~._,~, ,_"-~>,""".,-;-~."-~.~..----".........,..~.~..~......."",,,---,,"'~"~--',..._,_....,--._'" 4134110 OR: 4334 PG: 1291 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER CODNTY. FL 02/29/2008 at 02:50PM DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK REC FBi coms 27.00 3.00 Return to Retn: CLERK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR EXT 7240 Frank Ramsey Collier County HUS 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples. Florida 34112 File# 08-1S0-IF This space for recording 16D23 LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 100% OF COLLIER COUNTY IMPACT FEES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNITS This Agreement is entered into this ~ day of February, 2008, between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (COUNTY) and "Robert Martinez and Juani Martinez" (OWNER), collectively stated as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. This Lien Agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, known as "The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" (Ordinance). In the event of any conflict with this Agreement, the terms of the Ordinance shall apply. 2. The legal description of the dwelling unit is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. The term of this Agreement is from the date set forth above until the impact fee is repaid. 4. The amount of the impact fees deferred shall be paid to the COUNTY in full upon: a) the sale of the dwelling unit; b) the refinancing ofthe dwelling unit; c) a loss of the homestead exemption; or d) the first occurrence of any sale or transfer of any part of the affected real property, and in any such event the deferred impact fees shall be paid in full to the COUNTY not later then the closing of the sale, or not later then the effective date of the transfer. As set forth in Exhibit "B," the amount of the deferred impact fees is Twelve Thousand Four Hundred Fortv Two and 46/100 Dollars ($12.442.46). Repayment shall include any accrued interest. Interest shall be computed at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum, but in no event shall it exceed twenty-five percent (25%) ofthe total fee amount. 5. The deferred impact fees shall be a lien on the property described in Exhibit "A," which lien may be foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the Ordinance or with this Agreement. This Agreement shall operate as a lien against the dwelling unit. The lien shall terminate upon the recording of a release or satisfaction of lien in the public records of the County. The deferrals of impact fees and this Agreement shall run with the land, and neither the deferred impact fees nor this Agreement shall be transferred, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. Except as provided by law, regardless of any foreclosure on the first mortgage or other security interest, this lien shall otherwise be superior and paramount to the interest in the dwelling unit of any owner, lessee, tenant, mortgagee, or other person, except that this lien shall be on parity with any lien for County taxes. 6. Upon the satisfactory completion of this Agreement's requirements, COUNTY shall record any necessary documentation evidencing same. 7. In the event the OWNER is in default under the Ordinance or this Agreement, and the default is not cured within 30 days after written notice is provided to the OWNER, the COUNTY ~ OR: 4334 PG: 1292 16D23 may, at its sole option, collect the impact fee amount in default as set forth in the Ordinance, or bring a civil action to enforce this Agreement, or declare that the deterred impact fees are then in default and immediately due and payable. The COUNTY shall be entitled to recover all fees and costs, including attorney's fee and costs, incurred by the COUNTY in enforcing this Agreement, plus interest at the then maximum statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar year basis until paid. 8. This Agreement is the sole agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon the OWNER'S successors and assigns in interest. 9. This Agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the County at no cost to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Attest: DWIGHT E. BROck, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLI.JUNTY, ORIDA, By: ,:JfJL TOM HENNING, CHAIR By:~ ~~.I. ,(LC 'Attest IS to t)'lClerk '1glllt..... on 1 · Witnesses: '-f\ '\ w...lli C&J (,.. u.J-o Print Name ~\ct( \>\<"" !-\ 100,e..1", OWNER: ~()J\.{~~ Juani Martinez STATE OF FL IDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Sig of Person Taklllg Acknowledgment 2008, AL e~ AGNES MENDOZA ~ MY COMMISSION # 00594447 ~",:,.r EXPIRES. S""'"'^" 12. 2010 1"IXj..).NOTARY Fl. NOIary DiSOOmt Assoc. Co. ounty Attorney J;;;;(" L - ....-M cy Krumbin ,~A Director Collier County Housing and Human Services Jeffrey . Chief As *** OR: 4334 PG: 1293 *** EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 34, Liberty Landing, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 47, Pages 71 throngh 73, inclusive, of the Pu blic Records of Collier Connty, Florida. STREET ADDRESS 3656 Justice Circle, Immokalee, FL 34142 EXHIBIT "B" IMPACT FEE BREAKDOWN Type ofImpact Fee A. EMS Impact Fee B. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee C. Library Impact Fee D. Community Parks Impact Fee E. Regional Parks Impact Fee F. Educational Facilities System Impact Fee G. Road Impact Fee H. Government Buildings Impact Fee I. Law Enforcement Impact Fee TOTAL IMPACT FEES JAKApproved~_I_ 16D23 Amount Owed $100.59 $62.08 $368.18 $750.00 $1,659.00 $2,862.00 $6,059.00 $410.00 $171.61 $12,442.46 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 E' ' , TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTs SENT TO 2 TEE BOARD OF COUNTY COMl\1ISSIONERS OmCE FOR SIGNATURE ,,' Prlnl: on pink pap.... Altld1la original "~_r Original "~-.. slIould be baad dmivered la 1lIe Boaro. Office.. Thecomplet<d lOU..g ,lip and original --"""labe1Crwmled.la1lleBoudOffia:cmly~1boBoudhasllli:ell.acl!oII.0I11l1ei-.) , , , ,', " , . . ROUTING SLIP Comp.... rtl1ttiI1g IiDe:I 'llbrcugh 1#4 as ~ fer addiliaW ';Il"'~ dales, mdlor iafoxmadon Deedcd..Jf 1lIe rl"""':'_;is >ircIdy compleo: with 1lIe . ~tica.ot-tbe~'! . dr1w .Iin. rllroalll MIllie. ..... #lllIroulth 1#4, =....1lIe cbccl:Iist and forward la S... fllson (line ffl. Route to Addressee(s) . Office Initials Date (Lisr in ,ow:ilu. crdcrl ].5;'---' l. ,--= /.-/./ , 2. " , . 3. ., 4. C'. 5. Sue FIlson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners . 6. Minutes and Records ClerIc of Court's Office - \,.'.' PRIMARY CONTACT- INFORMA nON (The primmy _ is the bolder of the origillal documclt pOllding Bee approval. NClDll1l!y the primmy COI1OlCt is tho pcooo _ ClC:lIl:dIpn:pa the executive SlUIlISIlIIy, Primary = infomwion is aoodod ;., the .VOlll _ 0( 1lIe <1ddm:s= abave, il1cJudiog Suo Mlsoo, lIOCd '" cpotlCt sat! for odditioaa.l or otis3ing infomwico. All original dccumoolS ooodil1g.... Bee 0Wrma0', siplllIO'" '" b. dolivorod '" 1lIe Bee ollie: only afIor tho Bce has _ '" approve <be imm.) Name of Primary Staff J-y > . / Phon. Number 7 .3 Contacl , Ie 0..-_.z iC" r: / ,. \- __._-> (..\L......,'., Agenda Dale Irem was '.,,) Agcnda lrem Number /C" ,::1 Armmved bv the BCC c,,) ",.-) (,.. , t.: Type ofDocumenl , , /)/, ,., ,,2> Number of Original ,,;.;. - / _'--"_C;:' Atlached .) e Cd.l L:J Do=ents Aaached .// . It ^_ {- y INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N1 A. in the Not Applicable column. whichever is Ie. 1., Original documem has been signcd/"mirialed fer legal sUfficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman. with the exception of most Ie=. must be reviewed aIJd signed tiy the Oflice of the County Ar1rJrney. This includes signature pages from ordinances. resolutions. ele. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from conlraclS. agrecmcnrs. Clc. that have been fa1ly =uted by all parties except the BCC Oairman aIJd Clerk: to the Board aIJd ssibl SlalC Officials.) 2. All iwldwritten,Slri.Ice-through and revisions have been initialed by the County ~y.' s Office aIJd all other artias I the BCC Chairman aIJd the Clerk to the Board 3. The n.'n-,:..n's signature line dale has beca entered as the dare ofBCC approval of the documem or the final DC tiated contt:lCl dale wbichever is licable. 4. "Sign here" labs are p~ on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si aIJd initials are 5. In most cases (some conttaclS are an exception), the original documenl aIJd this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive aIJd reqaiIe 'forwarding to T.I1.h"~ee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be a of our n~.,n;nes! 6. The document was approved by the BCe 00 ~ 0.' ""(enter dale) and all c:hanges made during the meeting bave been incorporated in the attached docnmenl. The Conn Attorn's OfliC8 has ...viewed the as, if a Iicable. tv 1 Yes (Initial) " -f'\..... ~/'/~ ..~ . ~ _ County _ Bee _ Origillal DccumcIls Rccliag Slip WWS Origim.l9,03,04, R.vi.scd 1.26,05. Revised 2.24.05 MEMORANDUM Date: August 8, 2008 To: Michael Dowling, Property Management Specialist Real Estate Services From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Second Amendment To LeaseAgreement Attached for your records is one copy of each amendment, referenced above (Agenda Item #16E2) approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. The Minutes and Records Department has kept the third original lease agreement for the Board's permanent record. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-8411. Thank you. Attachments 16E2 16[2 Lease #880 SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT entered into this ~ day of ~lJi._L'-.>. , 2008 at Naples, Collier County, Florida by and between Alan and Patricia Boole, as signed to A & P Boole, LLC, by way of an Assignment of Lease dated April 4, 2007, whose mailing address is 470 Lagoon Avenue, Naples, Florida 34108, hereinafter referred to as "LESSOR," and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112, hereinafter referred to as "LESSEE," WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Collier County and A & P Boole, LLC, Boole have previously entered into a Lease Agreement dated July 31, 2001, and a First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated December 14, 2004; WHEREAS, the LESSOR and LESSEE are desirous of amending the Lease Agreement; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements provided within said Lease Agreement dated July 31, 2001, and Ten Dollars ($10,00) and other valuable consideration, said Lease Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 1. The following provision shall be added to Article 2 of the Lease Agreement: This Lease is hereby extended until March 1, 2009, hereinafter referred to as "Extended Lease Term," LESSEE is granted the option, provided it is not in default of any of the terms of this Lease, to renew this Lease for one (1) additional one (1) year terms under the same terms and conditions as provided for in the Lease dated July 31, 2001, hereinafter referred to as "Extended Renewal Term," LESSEE shall be granted the right to terminate the Lease at any time, with or without cause, by providing a thirty-day written notice of such termination to LESSOR at the address set forth in Article 1 0 of the Lease dated July 31, 2001. Said notice period shall commence upon placement of the written notice in an official depository of the United States Post Office, Registered or Certified Mail, postage prepaid, or by personal delivery or overnight delivery service, 2. The annual rent for the Extended Lease Term shall be increased by four percent from the previous year's rent and shall be increased by four percent for the Extended Renewal Term, should the LESSEE elect to renew this Lease, 3, Except as expressly provided herein, the Lease Agreement between Alan and Patricia Boole and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, for the utilization of the Demised Premises described in said Lease Agreement dated July 31, 2001, remains in full force and effect according to the terms and conditions contained therein, and said terms and conditions are applicable hereto except as expressly provided otherwise herein, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the LESSOR and LESSEE have hereto executed this First !1.. (Print Name) , G(f~u:'\ ~\ZUcuJ (Print Name) Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~rt~.~.~~ Jennifer A. Belpe '0 Assistant County Attorney 16E2 BY: ;f4~~~ A-.. (J <3 avl.-t: I /.-t..- c.: ALAN BOOLE ( 1V\ei"\q,E:<<. ~ .~-. ) \ / BY: ~.~.~ s~.'-, A ~ Q (Soo.....Q L..L-(..... .~ I PATRICIA BOOLE rt(:;:Mg.fR.. I 16[2 Lease #848 SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT J THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT entered into this"J 0 day of ,<...6.cA_'U.J'f~ ' 2008 at Naples, Collier County, Florida by and between Alan and Patricia Boole, as signed to A & P Boole, LLC, by way of an ASSignment of Lease dated April 4, 2007, whose mailing address is 470 Lagoon Avenue, Naples, Florida 34108, hereinafter referred to as "LESSOR," and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112, hereinafter referred to as "LESSEE," WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Collier County and A & P Boole, LLC, Boole have previously entered into a Lease Agreement dated December 15, 1998, and a First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated December 14,2004; WHEREAS, the LESSOR and LESSEE are desirous of amending the Lease Agreement; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements provided within said Lease Agreement dated December 15, 1998, and Ten Dollars ($10,00) and other valuable consideration. said Lease Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 1. The following provision shall be added to Article 2 of the Lease Agreement: This Lease is hereby extended until March 1, 2009, hereinafter referred to as "Extended Lease Term," LESSEE is granted the option, provided it is not in default of any of the terms of this Lease, to renew this Lease for one (1) additional one (1) year terms under the same terms and conditions as provided for in the Lease dated December 15, 1998, hereinafter referred to as "Extended Renewal Tenn." LESSEE shall be granted the right to terminate the Lease at any time, with or without cause, by providing a thirty-day v,Titten notice of such termination to LESSOR at the address set forth in Article 10 of the Lease dated December 15, 1998, Said notice period shall commence upon placement of the written notice in an official depository of the United States Post Otlice, Registered or Certified Mail, postage prepaid, or by personal delivery or overnight delivery service, 2, The annual rent for the Extended Lease Term shall be increased by four percent from the previous year's rent and shall be increased by four percent for the Extended Renewal Term, should the LESSEE elect to renew this Lease, 3, Except as expressly provided herein, the Lease Agreement between Alan and Patricia Boole and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, for the utilization of the Demised Premises described in said Lease Agreement dated December 15, 1998, remains in full force and effect according to the terms and conditions contained therein, and said terms and conditions are applicable hereto except as expressly provided otherwise herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the LESSOR and LESSEE have hereto executed this First (Print Name) Gr~ (Print Name) ~W?UoV Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: iJ(J. ~-~ ~ Assistant County Attorney 16E2 flY ~ /IV A 4: P oDLf- f G.-c.- ALAN BOOLE (VI€-fi\.be1 I BY \&C5LQ, ~<=- A ~ r bcou; U-c- . I PATRICIA BOOLE (YIe.(V\.b.e-f 16 E 4 ""Y MEMORANDUM DATE: March 7, 2008 TO: Lynn Wood, Contract Specialist Purchasing Department FROM: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Minutes and Records Department RE: Contract: 08-5012 "Cellular Communications Services & Equipment" Contractor: Sprint Solutions, Inc. Enclosed are two (2) original contract documents, as referenced above (Agenda Item #16E4) approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. Minutes & Records Department has retained an original copy. If you should have any questions, you may contact me at 252-8411. Thank you, Enclosures (2) ITEM NO.:~;P\2...('.cO & SC) FILE NO.: .. .. . ," \'V'>L DATE r'\J\-. ':II . ',' ''t,' :.\ '~~T'{ f:\ll'O~\U . ,\))1 Ii f'. \ 3 10n~ ~~R -0 p. V' "",-, RECEIVED: ,-......,. ROUTED TO: DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS LINE REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES Date: March 5, 2008 To: Office of the County Attorney Attention: Robert Zachary From: Lyn M. Wood, C.P.M., Contract Specialist ::t! Purchasing Department, Extension 2667 U~ Re: Contract: 08-5012 "Cellular Communications Services & Equipment" Contractor: Sprint Solutions, Inc. BACKGROUND OF REQUEST: This contract was approved by the BCC on February 26, 2008, Agenda Item 16.EA This item has not been previously submitted. ACTION REQUESTED: Contract review and approval. OTHER COMMENTS: Robert, upon approval, please forward to BCC for signature. If there are any questions concerning the document, please contact me. Purchasing would appreciate notification when the documents exit your office. Thank you. C: Scott Johnson, Purchasing 6C.(Vl/2- 3 - '1--6 'if 16E4 ,'\"~":~) """,r"n. ,.,.,,'C1 16E4 FROM: 0-47'(' R('e Jeff Walker R At4,f _ "('lv('O Risk Management Department IS,f ,.?fJtJQ> Lyn M. Wood, C.P.M., Contract specialist) A _ ~,y~ Purchasing Department UXr March 5, 2008 MEMORANDUM TO: DATE: RE: Review Insurance for Contract 08-5012 "Cellular Communications Services & Equipment" Contractor: Sprint Solutions, Inc. This Contract was approved by the BCC on February 26, 2008, Agenda Item 16.EA Please review the Insurance Certificates for the above referenced contract. If everything is acceptable, please forward to the County Attorney for further review and approval. Also, will you advise me when it has been forwarded. Thank you. If you have any questions, please contact me at extension 2667. ~- (){f/Ml- ?:T 3/b/O f dod/LMW C: Scott Johnson, Purchasing 16E4 CERTIFICATE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY I, TRACI TONG, a duly elected and acting Assistant Secretary of Sprint Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), do hereby certify that I am a duly elected and acting Assistant Secretary of the Corporation and have access to the corporate records and minutes of the Corporation. I further certify that Leon Frazier, a Vice President of the Corporation, is authorized to enter into contracts on behalf of the Corporation pursuant to the fiscal authorization policy applicable to the Corporation. In witness to the foregoing, I have signed my name as Assistant Secretary of Sprint Solutions, Inc. this 5th day of March, 2008, at 2001 Edmund Hailey Drive, Reston, Virginia. ~ ---... -- ~ /"---- r"'> Traci Tong Assistant Secretary www.sunbiz.org - Department of State Page I of2 16E4 Home Contact Us E.Filing Services Document Searches Forms H Previous on List Next on List Return To List No Events No Name History Entity Name: Detail by Entity Name Foreign Profit Corporation SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. Filing Information Document Number F02000004082 FEI Number 470882463 Date Filed 08/12/2002 State DE Status ACTIVE Principal Address 6500 SPRINT PARKWAY OVERLAND PARK KS 66251 Changed 04/14/2004 Mailing Address 6500 SPRINT PARKWAY HL-5ASTX OVERLAND PARK KS 66251 Changed 04/14/2004 Registered Agent Name & Address CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY 1201 HAYS STREET TALLAHASSEE FL 32301-2525 US Officer/Director Detail Name & Address TitleS/D HILL, CHRISTIE A 2001 EDMUND HALLEY DRIVE RESTON VA 20191 Title P ANGELINO, MARK 2001 EDMUND HALLEY DR. http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?action~D ETFJI ,&illlL doc _ number= F0200000408... 2/5/2008 www.sunbiz.org - Department of State RESTON VA 20191 TitleT LINDAHL. RICHARD 2001 EDMUND HALLEY DR RESTON VA 20191 Title D KENNEDY, LEONARD 2001 EDMUND HALLEY DR RESTON VA 20191 TitleVP BESHEARS, MARK V 6500 SPRINT PARKWAY OVERLAND PARK KS 66251 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2005 01/26/2005 2006 04/25/2006 2007 04/30/2007 Document Images 04/30/2007 ,~ANNUAL REPORT 04/25/2006 -- ANNUAL REPORT 01/26/2005 -- ANNUAL REPORT 04/14/2004:co ANNUAL REPORT 02/13/2003 :- ANNUAL REPORT 08/12/2002 'co Foreign Profit Page 2 of2 16[4 View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format Note: This is not official record. See documents if question or conflict. I E'LevioU!LaR!-i~1 Next an List R~t!lmTQ!-i!;t No Events No Name History Entity Name: Home Contact us Document Searches E-Filing Services Forms Help Copyright and Privacy Policies Copyright @ 2007 State of Florida, Department of State. http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?action~[) ETF1L&inq~ doc ~ numbcr~ F0200000408... 2/5/2008 A G R E E MEN T 08-5012 16[4 for Cellular Communications Services & Equipment THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this 26th day of February, 2008, by and between Sprint Solutions, Inc., authorized to do business in the State of Florida, whose business address is 2001 Edmund Halley Drive, Reston, Virginia 20191, hereinafter called the "Contractor" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Collier County, Naples, hereinafter called the "County": WIT N E SSE T H: 1. COMMENCEMENT. The contract shall be for a two (2) year period, commencing on March 1, 2008, and terminating on February 28, 2010. The County retains the right to renew this Agreement, with the consent of the Contractor, under the same terms and conditions for two (2) additional one-year periods. The Purchasing/General Services Director or his designee may, at his discretion, extend the Agreement under all of the terms and conditions in this Agreement for up to one hundred eighty (180) days. Any subsequent extensions must be approved by the Board of County Commissioners. The County shall give the Contractor written notice of the County's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior to the end of the Agreement term then in effect. 2. STATEMENT OF WORK. The Contractor shall provide cellular phones, equipment and services in accordance with the terms and conditions the Contractor's proposal in response to RFP #08-5012, Collier County's RFP #08-5012, and Exhibit A, Collier County Operating Parameters, Exhibit B, Wireless Services Term and Volume Discount, Exhibit C, Sprint Nextel Rate Plans, and Exhibit D, Wireless Services Product Terms and Conditions, referred to herein and made an integral part of this agreement. Due to technical and/or service and product changes, as new plan options and/or services are offered by the Contractor, the County shall have the option of switching, adding, and/or deleting products and/or services as required. Additional rate plans and/or services will be identified in subsequent, sequential attachments to this Agreement. Changes to any plans may be done at any time during this Agreement without penalty. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties and any modifications to this Agreement shall be mutually agreed upon in writing by the Page 1 of 21 16E4 Contractor and the County Project Manager or his designee, in compliance with the County Purchasing Policy and Administrative Procedures in effect at the time such services are authorized. Any County agency may purchase products and services under this Agreement, provided sufficient funds are included in their budgets. 3. COMPENSATION. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Agreement the aggregate of the units actually ordered and furnished at the unit price, together with the cost of any other charges/fees submitted in the proposal and Exhibit C - Sprint Nextel Rate Plans. Any and all Nextel iDEN accessories will be at a twenty percent (20%) discount off the then current price sheet. Payment will be made upon receipt of a proper invoice and upon approval by the Project Manager or his designee, and in compliance with Section 218.70, Fla. Stats., otherwise known as the "Florida Prompt Payment Act". Contractor's acceptance of late or partial payments is not a waiver of its right to collect the full amount due. Disputed Charges. If the County disputes a charge in good faith, the County may withhold payment of that charge if the County makes timely payment of all undisputed charges and, within thirty (30) days of the due date, provides Contractor with a written explanation of the County's reasons for disputing the charge. The County must cooperate with Contractor to promptly resolve any disputed charge. If Contractor determines, in good faith, that the disputed charge is valid, Contractor will notify Customer and Customer must pay the charge promptly or invoke the dispute resolution process in this Agreement. If Contractor determines in good faith that the disputed charge is invalid, Contractor will credit Customer for the invalid charge 4. NOTICES, All notices from the County to the Contractor shall be deemed duly served if mailed or faxed to the Contractor at the following Address: Sprint Solutions, Inc. 2001 Edmund Halley Drive Reston, VA 20191 MS: VARESP0101-1076 Attention: Michaela Clairmonte Manager, Contract Negotiations & Management Telephone: (703) 433-8581 Facsimile: (703) 433-8798 Page 2 of 21 16E4 With A Copy To: Sprint Solutions, Inc. 4914 South Tamiami Trail Sarasota, FL 34231 Attention: Tim Yokum, Public Sector Account Manager Telephone: 941-929-2108 Facsimile: 941-929-2101 All Notices from the Contractor to the County shall be deemed duly served if mailed or faxed to the County to: Collier County Government Center Purchasing Department - Purchasing Building 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, Florida 34112 Attention: Scott Johnson, Purchasing Agent Telephone: 239-252-8995 Facsimile: 239-252-6588 The Contractor and the County may change the above mailing address at any time upon giving the other party written notification. All notices under this Agreement must be in writing. 5. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating a partnership between the County and the Contractor or to constitute the Contractor as an agent of the County. 6. PERMITS: LICENSES: TAXES. In compliance with Section 218.80, F.S., all permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be obtained by the Contractor. Payment for all such permits issued by the County shall be processed internally by the County. All non-County permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be procured and paid for by the Contractor. In addition, the Contractor shall comply with all rules, regulations and laws of Collier County, the State of Florida, or the U. S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. The Contractor agrees to comply with all laws governing the responsibility of an employer with respect to persons employed by the Contractor. Contractor will recognize and honor all validly and properly issued and executed tax exemption certificates delivered by the County and statutory exemptions and will not bill the County for any such exempted taxes. Contractor's rates and charges for Products and Services, set forth in Contractor's response, do not include taxes. The County will pay all applicable taxes for which it does not hold a valid tax exemption, including, but not limited to, sales, use, gross receipts, excise, value-added, property, transaction, or other local, state, or national taxes or charges imposed or based on the provision, sale or use of Products and Services. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, if a jurisdiction where the County conducts business requires the Page 3 of 21 16E4 County to deduct or withhold separate taxes from any amount due to Contractor, the County must notify the Contractor in writing. The Contractor will then increase the gross amount of the County's invoice so that, after the County's deduction or withholding for taxes, the net amount paid to the Contractor will not be less than the amount the Contractor would have received without the required deduction or withholding. The County is not responsible for payment of Contractor's direct income and employment taxes. 7. NO IMPROPER USE. The Contractor will not use, nor suffer or permit any person to use in any manner whatsoever, county facilities for any improper, immoral or offensive purpose, or for any purpose in violation of any federal, state, county or municipal ordinance, rule, order or regulation, or of any governmental rule or regulation now in effect or hereafter enacted or adopted. In the event of such violation by the Contractor or if the County or its authorized representative shall deem any conduct on the part of the Contractor to be objectionable or improper, the County shall have the right to suspend the contract of the Contractor. Should the Contractor fail to correct any such violation, conduct, or practice to the satisfaction of the County within twenty-four (24) hours after receiving notice of such violation, conduct, or practice, such suspension to continue until the violation is cured. The Contractor further agrees not to commence operation during the suspension period until the violation has been corrected to the satisfaction of the County. 8. TERMINATION. Should either party be found to have failed to perform its services in a manner satisfactory to the non-breaching party, as per this Agreement, following a thirty-day period to cure, the non-breaching party may terminate said agreement for cause; further the County may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a thirty (30) day written notice. 9. NO DISCRIMINATION. The Contractor agrees that there shall be no discrimination as to race, sex, color, creed or national origin. 10. INSURANCE, The Contractor shall provide insurance as follows: A. Commercial General Liabilitv: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent Contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. B. Business Auto Liabilitv: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $300,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include: Owned Vehicles, Hired and Non-Owned Vehicles and Employee Non-Ownership. C. Workers' Compensation: Insurance covering all employees meeting Statutory Limits in compliance with the applicable state and federal laws. Page 4 of 21 16E4 Special Requirements: Collier County shall be listed as the Certificate Holder and included as an Additional Insured on the Comprehensive General Liability Policy. Current, valid insurance policies meeting the requirement herein identified shall be maintained by Contractor during the duration of this Agreement. Renewal certificates shall be sent to the County within fifteen (15) days of any expiration date. There shall be a thirty (30) day notification to the County in the event of cancellation of any stipulated insurance coverage. Contractor shall insure that all subContractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. 11. INDEMNIFICATION. To the maximum extent permitted by law and subject to the limitations set forth under Florida Statutes Section 768.28, the Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless Collier County, its officers and employees from any and all third party claims for liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and paralegals' fees arising directly from performance of this Agreement and relating to personal injury, death, or damage to tangible personal property that is alleged to have resulted in whole or in part, by the gross negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Contractor or anyone employed by the Contractor in the performance of this Agreement. This indenmification obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or reduce any other rights or remedies which otherwise may be available to an indemnified party or person described in this paragraph. This section does not pertain to any incident arIsmg from the sole negligence of Collier County. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as a waiver of the limits of liability County has by virtue of sovereign immunity in excess of what is afforded under law. 12. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of the County by the Purchasing Department. 13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Contractor represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder. Contractor further represents that no persons having any such interest shall be employed to perform those services. 14. COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS CONTRACT. This Contract consists of the attached component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the contract as if herein set out verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, Insurance Certificate, RFP #08-5012 Specifi- cations/Scope of Services and Exhibits A, B, C and D. Page5of21 16E4 15. SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties herein that this agreement is subject to appropriation by the Board of County Commissioners. 16. PROHIBITION OF GIFTS TO COUNTY EMPLOYEES. No organization or individual shall offer or give, either directly or indirectly, any favor, gift, loan, fee, service or other item of value to any County employee, as set forth in Chapter 112, Part III, Florida Statutes, Collier County Ethics Ordinance No. 2004-05, and County Administrative Procedure 5311. Violation of this provision may result in one or more of the following consequences: a. Prohibition by the individual, firm, and/or any employee of the firm from contact with County staff for a specified period of time; b. Prohibition by the individual and/or firm from doing business with the County for a specified period of time, including but not limited to: submitting bids, RFP, and/or quotes; and, c. immediate termination of any contract held by the individual and/or firm for cause. 17. IMMIGRATION LAW COMPLIANCE. By executing and entering into this agreement, the Contractor is formally acknowledging without exception or stipulation that it is fully responsible for complying with the provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 U.s.e. 1324, et seq. and regulations relating thereto, as either may be amended. Failure by the Contractor to comply with the laws referenced herein shall constitute a breach of this agreement and the County shall have the discretion to unilaterally terminate this agreement immediately. 18. VENUE. Any suit or action brought by either party to this Agreement against the other party relating to or arising out of this Agreement must be brought in the appropriate federal or state courts in Collier County, Florida, which courts have sole and exclusive jurisdiction on all such matters. 19. OFFER EXTENDED TO OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. Collier County encourages and agrees to the successful proposer extending the pricing, terms and conditions of this solicitation or resultant contract to other governmental entities at the discretion of the successful proposer. 20. AGREEMENT TERMS. If any portion of this Agreement is held to be void, invalid, or otherwise unenforceable, in whole or in part, the remaining portion of this Agreement shall remain in effect. 21. ADDITIONAL ITEMS/SERVICES. Additional items and/ or services may be added to this contract upon satisfactory negotiation of price by the Contract Manager and Contactor. 22. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Prior to the initiation of any action or proceeding permitted by this Agreement to resolve disputes between the parties, the parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve any such disputes by negotiation. The negotiation shall be attended by representatives of Contractor with full decision-making authority and by Page 6 of 21 16D4 the County's staff person who would make the presentation of any settlement reached during negotiations to the County for approval. Failing resolution, and prior to the commencement of depositions in any litigation between the parties arising out of this Agreement, the parties shall attempt to resolve the dispute through Mediation before an agreed-upon Circuit Court Mediator certified by the State of Florida. The mediation shall be attended by representatives of the Contractor with full decision-making authority and by the County's staff person who would make the presentation of any settlement reached at mediation to the County's Board for approval. Should either party fail to submit to mediation as required hereunder, the other party may obtain a court order requiring mediation under section 44.102, Fla. Stat. 23. ASSIGNMENT, SUBLEASE, SALE, etc.: Should the contractor sell or sublet this contract or any part thereof to any person or entity other than the awardee, the Board of County Commissioners shall be notified in writing immediately upon the transfer of ownership. The assignment of this contract or any part thereof, shall require that its assignee be bound to it and to assume toward the contractor, all of the obligations and responsibilities that contractor has assumed toward the County. In the County's best interest, and at its option, the service/commodity may be re-bid, delivering a sixty (60) day written notice to the new owner(s). Page 7 of 21 16E4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the County, have each, respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above written. ATTEST;::. ''',;., J.,.~; ),,, , Dw~g E:'Br.q~~..Clerk of Courts , '., 0f1 ~ ,",D~.1\_ ~ ""~'r~Lr~ Gated: 3<1i:"6~ Att.fSEAL)' " ;S, u.to.,.....~ slqna6i~~j~'''''''''' . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: . SPRINT SOLUTIONS. INC. Contractor By: iI;I~;5k",,-~ , Signatute" H. Leon Frazier - Senior Vice President Typed signature and title Klc~w\ CU\I(2.f-.{oV'l'tlC- tType/print witness namet Sprint - Approved as to Legal Form HAF - 25 Feb 2008 Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~ Item # lloe+ Agenda ." _"7 L. 0 Dale ~ <<-<!--oe; Print Name ~~ Deputy Clerk Page 8 of 21 EXHIBIT A 16f4 Collier County Operating Parameters Approved Equipment: The County will approve a total of three (3) units to use. They will include one data phone (Blackberry), and two traditional voice only units (non-blackberry). The County may, at its discretion, add units to the approved equipment list after successful negotiation of price. The County reserves the right to purchase Client Access Licenses (CALs) for the Blackberry Enterprise Server (BES) from any source. All equipment shall be delivered to the Contract Manager. Approved Rate Plans: 1. The County intends to use "pooled voice minutes" as the primary method of billing. Sprint will make a recommendation of appropriate rate plan(s) for the pooled packages. The rate shall be billed per phone per OAC. The County requires the following features free of charge: Caller 10, Voice Mail, Call Waiting, Mobile to Mobile calling for Sprint COMA subscribers, and free Nights & Weekend minutes between 7PM and 7 AM and on weekends. 2. The Unlimited BlackBerry Email and Web plan to be provided for all County BlackBerry data devices shall include tethering at no cost as outlined in Sprint's proposal. 3. The County requests that any services that result in a per item cost such as text messaging, or any other such item, be blocked from use. Sprint can only block text messaging on cellular units with voice only services. 4. The entire Sprint portfolio of products and services will be available for the County to use under this Agreement, however, any changes to the discount structure will require a letter of approval from the County's Contract Manager. Number Portability: It is the responsibility of the Contractor to handle all portability issues as they arise. Contractor will make a commercially reasonable effort to complete numbers transferred through portability within seven (7) business days. Before a telephone number previously used with another carrier can be used on a Sprint Network, the County must provide information about the account with the other carrier (account name, account number, address, and social security number or tax identification number) and purchase Sprint Wireless Products from Contractor. Master Billing Account: Collier County requests a new master billing account. Collier County will not accept paper bills. Bills must be presented on line. The master billing account shall include, Department Name, Cost Center information, User Name, Telephone Number, Rate Plan(s), and the Approved Features. Page 9 of 21 16[b. Access to Master Account: The County's Contract Manager shall have full access to manage · the account via the internet or by phone. The access shall include, but not limited to, the ability to move phones from the current billing DAC to another DAC, change Electronic Serial Numbers (ESN), add or delete features, and/or suspend/reactivate equipment. Any phone in changes to the Master Account must be approved in writing by the Contract Manager in advance of the change occurring. The County's Contract Manager shall have the ability to setup access for other users as needed. Sprint will establish the new account and setup departmental access credentials to their DAC only. That access shall be "view only". Commencement of Invoicing. Contractor may begin invoicing the County in full for non- recurring and recurring charges on the later of the date the Products or Services are installed and made available or the first day of the first bill cycle after the Effective Date. The County's first invoice may contain a pro-rata charge for the period of time from activation to the end of the then-current billing cycle. Delavs. In certain instances (e.g., Roaming charges), Contractor may bill the County in the current invoice cycle for usage that occurred during a prior invoicing cycle, if not previously invoiced to the County. When Contractor's invoices for usage incurred during a prior invoicing cycle, those minutes count against minutes in the current invoicing cycle. Demo Equipment: The Contractor shall provide the County with a total of twenty-five (25) telephone units ("Loaner Devices") to be used as spares when there is a broken piece of equipment. The Loaner Devices will be provided to the County Contract Manager in a non-active state for distribution and activation on an as needed basis. The County will be responsible for the airtime charges incurred on the Loaner Devices. Bidirectional Amplifiers: The Contractor shall provide to the County bidirectional amplifiers, and shall install such bidirectional amplifiers within ninety (90) days upon formal request by the County Contract Manager. All requests will be made in writing. Requests for extensions to the ninety (90) day window may be made in writing to the County. There shall not be a limit to the amount of BOA's the County may request. Additional terms and conditions will apply to bidirectional amplifier installations. Access to support: Sprint shall provide the County's Contract Manager with direct access to technical, billing, and sales support. Transition Inventory List: Sprint shall provide the County Contract Manager with a spreadsheet inventory of all phones detailing, Department Name, Department Cost Center, User Name, Phone number, Model number, ESN number and DAC, at the conclusion of the transition to the new account. Page 10 of 21 EXHIBIT B WIRELESS SERVICES TERM AND VOLUME DISCOUNT 16E4 1. GOVERNMENT DISCOUNT PROGRAM (uGDpU). 1.1 Effective Date of Discounts. For new "Active Units" (defined as a Product that Customer enrolls in a Business Plan under the Agreement), the discounts below apply as of the Commencement Date. For Active Units under pre-existing agreement(s) between Sprint and Customer, Sprint will apply the discounts no later than 60 days after the Commencement Date. 1.2 Government Discount. The Government Discount, described in the table below, is a percentage discount off the eligible monthly recurring charges ("MRCs") charged for Customer-Liable Active Units. Network Government Service Individual-Liable Service Pricing Discount Pricing Discount Sprint National Network and Nextel 25% 15% National Network 1.3 How Calculated. Service Pricing Discounts apply to eligible MRCs before taxes and surcharges and after calculation of all other credits, discounts, and rebates. Overage, usage-based, and third party application and service charges, as well as certain network-specific Products and Services, are not eligible for Service Pricing Discounts. Service Pricing Discounts may apply to the MRC of certain promotional rate plans which Sprint may offer on a limited time basis and subject to promotion-specific restrictions. 1.4 Eligibility. Only Active Units that are included in Customer's Sprint account hierarchy are eligible for the GDP, It may take up to 2 invoicing cycles to move pre-existing Active Units to the same invoicing cycle in order to start receiving the Government Discount. Customer's contractors, suppliers, and any non-government, non- authorized agencies working with Customer are not eligible for the Government Discount. 2, EMPLOYEE DISCOUNT PROGRAM. 2.1 Eligible Employees. New and existing Customer Employee (or Individual-Liable) Active Units may receive the Individual-Liable Service Pricing Discount in the table above. The Individual-Liable Service Pricing Discount is contingent upon the Employee signing Sprint's consumer subscriber agreement and providing Sprint with satisfactory evidence of employment with Customer. Customer and Sprint will agree on methods for employment verification. Upon termination of this Agreement for any reason, or upon the Employee's termination of employment with Customer, Sprint may cease applying the Individual.Liable Service Pricing Discount Except for the Individual-Liable Service Pricing Discount, Individual.Liable Active Units are subject to the terms and conditions in the consumer subscriber agreement. 2,2 Communications. Customer's employee benefits group and Sprint will develop a communications plan to present discounts and to sell to Employees within 60 days of the Effective Date. Communications may include, but are not limited to, new hire materials, benefits enrollment materials, e-mail, payroll stuffers, newsletters, or Internet and intranet links. 3. WIRELESS DEVICE PURCHASE DISCOUNTS AND UPGRADE TERMS. 3.1 Wireless Device Purchase Discount. New Customer-Liable Active Units are eligible for a minimum 39% discount off the "one year net price," defined as the suggested retail price less $75.00. The devices offered with this discounted price may change at any time in Sprint's sole discretion. This discounted device offer may not be available in all sales channels. 3.2 Upgrade Terms. Existing Customer-Liable Active Units may be upgraded or replaced after 12 months of continuous service at the discounted device price identified in Section 3.1 above. Otherwise, the suggested retail price will apply. 4. ACTIVATION FEES. Sprint will waive the nonrefundable activation fee of $36 for each Customer account hierarchy. Activation fees for Individual-Liable Active Units are governed by Sprint's consumer subscriber agreement. Page II of21 EXHIBIT C - SPRINT NEXTEL RATE PLANS 16 E 4. NEXTEL NATIONAL NETWORK BUSINESS PLANS & POLICIES 1. PROVISION OF NEXTEL PRODUCTS AND SERVICES. This Attachment A-1 applies only to Nextel Products and Services operating on the Nextel National Network. Any of the following entities may provide the Nextel Services listed in the Agreement, depending on Customer's billing address or the location where the Nextel Services are activated: Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc. Nextel of New York, Inc. Nextel South Corp. Nextel Partners of Upstate New York, Inc. Nextel of California, Inc. Nextel of Texas, Inc. 1.1 1.2 Nextel West Corp. NPCR, Inc. 2. NEXTEL VOICE AND DATA RATE PLANS. Customer may select from the Nextel voice and data rate plans listed in this Attachment or promotional rate plans which Sprint may offer on a limited time basis. 2.1 Business Essentials with 7 P.M. Plan. Business Business Business Business Business Business Essentials Essentials Essentials Essentials Essentials Essentials 400 1000 1400 2000 3000 4000 MRC $39.99 $59.99 $79.99 $99.99 $149.99 $199.99 Anvtime Minutes 400 1000 1400 2000 3000 4000 A~me Minutes Over~ $OAO/minute $OAO/minute $OAO/minute $OAO/minute $OAO/minute $OAO/minute Local & Nationwide Walkie-Talkie Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Nights & Weekends Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited startinn at 7 n.m. Shared Minutes Included Included Included Included Included Included Nationwide Loon Distance Included Included Included Included Included Included Roamina Not Available Not Available Not Available Nol Available Not Available Not Available Caller 10 & Voice Mail Included Included Included Included Included Included Note: TalkgroupSM, Group Walkie-Talkie and International Walkie-Talkie charges not included. Walkie-Talkie available on Walkie-Talkie enabled devices only. 2.2 Free Incoming Plans. Free Incoming Free Incoming Free Incoming Free Incoming 300 500 800 1000 MRC $49.99 $59.99 $79.99 $99.99 Anvtime Minutes 300 500 800 1,000 Anvtime Minutes Overane $OA5/minute $OA5/minute $OA5/minute $OA5/minute Local & Nationwide Walkie-Talkie Uniimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Ninhts & Weekends startinn at 9 nm Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Nationwide Lono Distance Included Included Included Included Roaminn Not availabie Not available Not available Not available Shared Minutes Not available Not available Not available Not available Caller 10 & Voice Mail Included Included Included Included Note: TalkgroupSM, Group Walkie-Talkie and International Walkie-Talkie charges not included. Walkie-Talkie available on Walkie-Talkie enabled devices only. 2.3 Unlimited Mobile-to-Mobile Calling Add-On. I Unlimited Mobile-to-Mobile MRC . $5.00 Note 1: Mobile-ta-Mobile minutes may be between Nextel, Sprint pes, and Boost subscribers. Note 2: Long distance charges apply to any plans that do not expressly include Nationwide Long Distance. 2.4 Unlimited Nights and Weekends Add-On. Unlimited Nights and Weekends 7pm Unlimited Niahts and Weekends 5am MRC $5.00 $10.00 Page 12 of 21 16E4 SPRINT PCS SERVICES BUSINESS PLANS & POLICIES 1. PROVISION OF SPRINT PCS PRODUCTS AND SERVICES. Sprint Spectrum LP. provides the Sprint PCS Products and Services operating on the Sprint National Network listed in the Agreement. All terms and conditions in this Attachment only refer to Sprint PCS Active Units operating on the Sprint National Network. 2. SPRINT PCS AFFILIATES. Pricing in this Attachment may not be available to Active Units activated in Sprint PCS Affiliate Markets. 3. SPRINT PCS VOICE AND DATA PLANS FOR BUSINESS 3.1 Sprint Business Essentials~ With 7 P.M. Plan. Business Business Business Business Business Business Essentials Essentials Essentials Essentials Essentials Essentials 400 1000 1400 2000 3000 4000 MRC $39.99 $59.99 $79.99 $99.99 $149.99 $199.99 Anytime Minutes 400 1000 1400 2000 3000 4000 $OAO/minut $OAO/minut $OAO/minut $OAO/minut $OAO/minut $OAO/minute Anvtime Minutes Overaoe e e e e e Mobile to Mobile Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Uniimited Unlimited Unlimited Uniimited Nights & Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Weekends starlina at 7 p.m. Shared Minutes Included Included Included included Included Included Nationwide Lana Distance Included Included Included Inciuded Included Included Roamina Included Included Included Included Included Included Caller ID & Voice Mail Included Included Included Included Included Included 3.2 Sprint Free Incoming Plan. Sprint Free Sprint Free Sprint Free Sprint Free Incoming Incoming Incoming Incoming 300 500 800 1000 MRC $49.99 $59.99 $79.99 $99.99 Anvtime Minutes 300 500 800 1000 Incomina Minutes Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Anvtime Minute Overaae $OA5/minute $OA5/minute $OA5/minute $OA5/minute Unlimited Niahts & Weekends starlina at 9 nm Included Included Included Included Nationwide Lana Distance Included Included Included Included Domestic Voice Roamina Included Included Included Included Domestic Voice Roaming Lang Distance Included Inciuded Included Included Shared Minutes Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Caller ID & Voice Mail Included Included Included Included 3.3 Sprint Unlimited Mobile-to-Mobile Calling Add-On. I Unlimited Mobile-to-Mobile MRC $5.00 Note 1: Mobile-ta-Mobile minutes may be between Nextel, Sprint pes, and Boost subscribers. Note 2: Long distance charges apply to any plans that do not expressly include Nationwide Long Distance. 3.4 Unlimited Nights and Weekends Add-On. Unlimited Nights and Weekends - 7 om Unlimited Niahts and Weekends - 6 pm MRC $5.00 $10.00 Page 13 of 21 16 r:lt. L . 3.5 Sprint PCS Connection Card Plans. MRC $39.99 40MB $0.001/KB $99.99 $79.99 Unlimited Not A Iicable Not Applicable $0.20 er minute $0.20 er minute Note: All pricing and available MBs are the same whether Active Units use the Sprint Mobile Broadband (EV-DO) network or the Sprint pes Vision (1 xRTT) network. Sprint Mobile Broadband coverage is not available everywhere and requires a Sprint Mobile Broadband-compatible connection card. Where the Sprint Mobile Broadband network is available and a Sprint Mobile Broadband-compatible connection card is used, Active Units will first attempt to connect to the Sprint Mobile Broadband network, then default to the Sprint pes Vision network depending on coverage and network availability. 4. ELECTRONIC BilLING PRODUCTS. 4.1 The following electronic billing products are offered for customers desiring electronic invoice data. Each electronic billing product provides Customer-Liabie Active Unit call detail record ("COR") information. Sprint offers these products under the "Electronic Invoice Reporting and Analytics Product Annex" which is available for review at www.sprint.com/ratesandconditions and can be attached to this Agreement at Customer's request. The MRCs are as follows: One-lime ELECTRONIC BilliNG PRODUCTS Invoice Data SummarY Data MRC Set-up Fee eBillinn & Analvsis 3 months 12 months $35.00 $200.00 Electronic Bill Transfer (EBT) 2 months N/A Not Annlicable Not Applicable Electronic Data Interchanne IEDI\ 1 month N/A Not Applicable Not Aoolicable 4.2 Customer may choose 1 electronic billing product. or eBilling & Analysis and either EDI or EBT. Customer may not choose the EDI and EBT products together. Upon 30 days prior written notice. Sprint reserves the right to migrate Customer to an updated or successor version of the selected electronic billing product if available or to an entirely new electronic billing product. 4.3 Customer will receive a summary invoice (without COR information) or a remittance invoice at no additional charge. If Customer chooses to receive a detailed paper invoice along with an electronic billing product. the following MRCs will apply. Customer-liable Active Units MRC 5-500 $ 100.00 500+ $ 250.00 Page 14 of 21 16E4 EXHIBIT D WIRELESS SERVICES PRODUCT TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. APPLICABILITY. "Sprint Wireless Products and Services" refers generally to Nextel Products and Services provided over the Nextel National Network (using iDEN technology) and Sprint PCS Products and Services provided over the Sprint National Network (using COMA technology). Except where noted in this Annex or the Agreement, terms and conditions of this Annex apply to Wireless Products and Services offered on both networks. 2. WIRELESS SERVICES CHARGES. 2.1 Monthly Recurring Charges ("MRC"). If Customer selects a Business Plan with included minutes, Sprint will bill for voice Wireless Services based on the MRC, plus charge for voice usage beyond the included minutes by multiplying the excess minutes by the applicable overcharge rate. 2.2 Usage Charges A. General. Depending on the Business Plan selected, Customer may incur usage charges based on how, when and where Customer uses the Services, including wireless voice calls, push-la-talk services such as Sprint PCS Ready Link, Local Walkie-Talkie, Nationwide Walkie-Talkie, International Walkie-Talkie, Group Walkie-Taikie, TalkgroupSM, Mobile Messaging, or Wireless Data Services. B. Voice Call Services. Customer's call usage for voice calls (other than push-to-talk calls) is calcuiated from the time Customer initiates contact with the Network until the Network connection is broken or dropped, whether or not the actual connection to the intended recipient of the call or data transmission is successful. Customer is responsible for incoming and outgoing call charges on calls that are answered. Circuit-switched calls taking place on Wireless Data Services devices, including Sprint PCS Vision- capable devices, that do not have voice plans associated with them will incur a per minute charge. C. Wireless Data. For Active Units that are not on an unlimited data usage Plan, data usage is calculated on a per kilobyte basis without regard to airtime used. Data usage is rounded up to the next whole kilobyte (on the Sprint PCS Vision and Power Vision systems) or nearest one-tenth of a kilobyte (on the Nextel National Network) and kilobyte usage charges are rounded up to the next full cent. Rounding up occurs at the end of each separate session or each clock hour (at the top of each hour), if the session spans more than 1 clock hour. Customer's invoice will not separately identify the number of kilobytes attributable to Customer's use of specific sites, sessions or services used. When traveling on the Network, a data session may end when moving between coverage areas and a new data session initiated, although no interruption to the actual data session will occur. Customer may be charged for data exchanges initiated by other Internet users as well as those Customer initiates. Estimates of data usage, for example, the size of downloadable files, wili vary from actual use. Customer will be charged for additional data used in transporting and routing on the Network and for partial or interrupted data downloads and re-sent data, as well as unsuccessful attempts to reach Web sites and use other applications and services, including those resulting from dropped network connections. D. Long Distance/Special Services. Customer may incur long distance charges (including international calling) or other charges for calls to 800, 866, 877, 888 and other toll-free numbers on Business Plans that do not include long distance. Customer may also incur charges for special Services such as 411, operator-assisted calls or call-forwarding. Push-to-talk connections do not incur long distance charges. E. Push-to-Talk Services. (1) Airtime Charges. Airtime charges apply to connections using a push-to-talk service for the entire period of time the transmission is connected to the Network. (2) Calculation of Airtime Charges. Customer will be charged a 6 second minimum for all push-to-talk transmissions on the Nextel National Network and a 1 minute minimum for all push-to-talk transmissions on the Sprint National Network. A push-to-talk transmission begins approximately when Customer presses the button to initiate a transmission and ends approximately 6 seconds after completion of a communication (Le., when Customer or another participant releases the button) to which no participant responds. Customer initiates a new transmission if Customer responds more than 6 seconds after another participant completes a communication. Airtime charges for push-to-talk calls are charged to the party that initiates the transmission and, unless a rate plan includes unlimited transmissions or access, are calculated by multiplying the duration of the transmission (including the 6 second period referred to above) by the applicable rate and the number of participants. After 6 seconds, ~ush-to-talk airtime is rounded up to the next second. Nationwide, international, TalkgroupS ,and Group Walkie-Talkie calls use the Local Walkie-Talkie minutes in Customer's plan and may incur additional access and overage charges. Sprint does not charge for sending or receiving call alert transmissions ("Call Alerts"), but Customer will initiate a new push-to-talk call if Customer responds to a Call Alert, even if responding within 6 seconds of receiving the alert. Page 15 of 21 16E4 F. Text and Numeric Messaging, Text and numeric messaging are charged on a per message basis unless Customer has purchased a block of messages at a fixed monthly price. With block pricing, Sprint will charge at the per message rate for each message that exceeds Customer's selected block. 2.3 Other Charges. A. Reactivation Fee. If Sprint temporarily or permanently terminates the Service, Sprint may charge a reactivation charge per account, in addition to any outstanding account balance, before Sprint reactivates Services. B. Roaming Charges. Calls made while off the applicable Network may, depending on Customer's Business Plan, incur separate Roaming charges. Domestic Roaming rates are set out in the Customer's pricing attachment. International Roaming rates will vary. For current International Roaming rates, Customer can access http://www.sorint.com or contact their Sprint Account Representative. There may be delays in invoicing Roaming charges due to the practices of the roaming service provider. C, Upgrade Charges. If an Active Unit changes devices using Sprint Wireless Products and Services during the Term, Sprint may charge an upgrade charge per Active Unit changed. A change in device or Business Plan that does not involve a move between the Nextel National Network and the Sprint National Network is not considered a termination of service. 3. CREDITS FOR REDIALED CALLS. Sprint will provide Customer with an airtime credit of 1 minute for a call on a Customer-Liable Active Unit that is: (a) placed while in an area covered by a Sprint Network, (b) disconnected, and, (c) redialed within one (1) minute of disconnection. Customer must contact Sprint Wireless Customer Solutions within 24 hours of the disconnection and request credit for the call through the interactive voice response unit. If the interactive voice response unit is not available, Customer may call Sprint Wireless Customer Solutions to speak directly with a representative. 4. WIRELESS SERVICE OPTIONS. 4.1 Push-To-Talk Voice Services. A. "Push-to-talk Services" refers generally to both Sprint PCS Ready Link on the Sprint National Network and Local Walkie-Talkie, Nationwide Walkie-Talkie, International Walkie-Talkie, Group Walkie-Talkie, and Talkgroup on the Nextel National Network. Push-to-talk Services require push-to-talk enabled phones on both the originating and receiving ends of the call. Push-to-talk calls may not work simultaneously with a voice call or with all types of Wireless Data transmissions from the same push-to-talk phone. B, "Walkie-Talkie Calling" means calls from one Walkie-Talkie enabled Active Unit on the Nextel National Network to another Walkie-Talkie enabled Active Unit on the same network. All Walkie-Talkie enabled wireless devices support Local Walkie-Talkie. Select Walkie-Talkie enabled devices support Nationwide, International, and Group Walkie-Talkie and TalkgroupsM calls. The number of Walkie-Talkie minutes included and the applicable overage rates vary by Business Plan. Walkie-Talkie options are available as an add-on for an additional charge if not already included in Customer's selected Business Plan. To use Walkie-Talkie or TalkgroupsM features, Customer must have a Business Plan that supports Local Walkie- Talkie minutes. Nationwide, International, TalkgroupSM, and Group Walkie-Talkie minutes of use are deducted from the Local Walkie-Talkie minutes when included in Customer's Business Plan unless Customer's Business Plan includes no Local Walkie-Talkie minutes or unlimited Walkie-Talkie minutes. For current Local Walkie-Talkie calling areas or international coverage areas, Customers can contact their Sprint Account Representatives or visit www.sprint.com. Certain restrictions apply to Walkie-Talkie and Talkgroup features and can be found at www.sprinl.com. 4.2 Sprint Free Incoming Minute Plans. Sprint Free Incoming Minute Plans apply only to calls received in the United States. Incoming call minutes are not free while Roaming, unless covered under a Roaming option selected by Customer. 4,3 Sprint Mobile-To-Mobile Calling Option, "Sprint Mobile-to-Mobile Calling" means calls from one Active Unit on either the Sprint National Network or the Nextel National Network to another Active Unit on either Network. With this option, Customer may use an unlimited number of minutes each month to make or receive calls on both Sprint Networks between Sprint PCS and Nextel phones, except for Nextel phones in some affiliate and partner markets. Sprint Mobile-to-Mobile calls made from or received on an Active Unit that is on a Sprint Network will use the Sprint Mobile-to-Mobile calling minutes and will not use Anytime Minutes. Sprint Mobile- to-Mobile calling is not available while Roaming. Sprint Mobile-to-Mobile calls made from or received on a Sprint PCS Product that is off the Network or in a non-participating affiliate or partner territory will be treated as Roaming and Roaming charges may apply depending on the applicable Business Plan. Sprint Mobile-to- Mobile Calling is not available for calls made to check voicemail, obtain directory assistance, or through other indirect calling methods. If one user has a plan with Sprint Mobile-to-Mobile calling and the other does not, the user with the Sprint Mobile-to-Mobile Calling will use this feature, while the other user's use is subject to the terms of that user's Business Plan. Page 16 of 21 16t4 4.4 PowerSource Phones. Service features and plans vary per PowerSource Phone and may not be available in all markets. Active Units upgrading to a PowerSource Phone may experience changes in service availability, pooling eligibility and billing. Nextel Walkie-Talkie service is only available in coverage areas of the Nextel National Network (using iDEN technology). Voice and data service is only available in coverage areas of the Sprint National Network (using CDMA technology). 4.5 Voice Command. The Voice Command option, which allows users to dial calls using verbal commands, is not available while roaming off the Sprint National Network. Calls to 911 or similar emergency numbers cannot be placed through Voice Command, but Customer may still call 911 through manual dialing. Airtime and applicable long distance charges begin when the TALK or similar key is pressed. 4.6 Insurance. Customer may purchase insurance to protect against loss, theft, or damage involving Customer's Wireless Products. Coverage may not be available for all Products and may involve a per claim deductible. Enhanced warranty coverage is available on some Products. Insurance is provided by third party insurers and not by Sprint If Customer selects coverage, Sprint will charge Customer a monthly premium per covered Product and Sprint will remit the premiums to the third party insurer on Customer's behalf. Claims must be submitted directly to the third party insurer. Terms of insurance coverage are available at the point of sale or in subsequent communications. 4.7 Shared Minutes I Pooling. Customer must have a minimum of 3 Customer-Liable Active Units sharing to be eligible for the Shared Minutes option. All Customer-Liable Active Units using this option must subscribe to an eligible voice Business Plan. After all Anytime Minutes in the pooled Business Plans are exhausted, each Customer-Liable Active Unit's additional airtime minutes are billed at the overage rate defined in the associated Business Plan. Shared Minutes only allows pooling of Anytime Minutes, and is not available for data Business Plans. Shared Minutes are not available with all voice Business Plans. See your Sprint account representative or www.sorint.com for a full listing of eligible Business Plans. 4.8 Add-A-Phone. Add-A.Phone allows Customers to add Active Units to a voice Business Plan. With this option, Customers using CDMA technology may add Active Units to the Sprint National Network and Customers using iDEN technology may add Active Units to the Nextel National Network. Customers must have a minimum of 1 Active Unit with a Business Plan that includes Anytime Minutes to qualify for this option. Sprint may limit the number of Active Units a Customer adds to its voice Business Plan with this option. Certain features, such as Sprint Mobile-to-Mobile Calling, may not be included based on the voice Business Plan that Customer selects. The Add-A-Phone option is not available with all voice Business Plans. Contact your Sprint Account Representative for eligible Business Plans. 4.9 Roaming Option. Active Units with Business Plans that include Domestic Roaming, may use up to 50% of their monthly usage (or allotted roaming minutes in certain markets) for Domestic Roaming. If Domestic Roaming exceeds this threshold, Sprint may terminate the Wireless Service to the Active Unit, transfer the Active Unit to another Business Plan, or charge the Active Unit at the applicable Roaming rate for the overage. Roaming minutes may not be shared and are not avaiiable with single-band or digital mode only Active Units. 5. WIRELESS DATA SERVICES. 5.1 Wireless Data Services Defined. Wireless Data Services include applications such as emaii, data, information and other wireless Internet services (the "Applications"). Use of Wireless Data Services is subject to any storage, memory or other Product limitation. 5.2 Mobile Broadband I EV-DO. "Mobile Broadband" means wireless high-speed data solutions and Services provided over the Sprint Power Vision Network (using CDMA technology) in certain coverage areas. To use this option, Customer must have a Mobile Broadband compatible wireless device and subscribe to a Mobile Broadband data plan. Access to the Sprint Power Vision Network from a personal computer requires installation of the Sprint Connection Manager software or Mac OS update for Macintosh. Mobile broadband rates may vary depending on the coverage area. Coverage is not available in all areas. Customer may learn more about current coverage at <www.sprintcom/business/products/products/evdoEnterZip.jsp>. 5.3 Compatibility of Third Party Products or Applications. Certain Applications offered by Sprint or authorized third parties may be compatible with certain Products and Services. Sprint does not guarantee compatibility of third party Products or Applications with any Sprint Wireless Products or Services. Compatibility or notice from Sprint of compatibility should not be construed as an endorsement of a third party Product or Application or a commitment by Sprint that the Product or Application will continue to be compatible with Sprint Products or Services. Unless otherwise stated in this Agreement, Sprint may, in its sole discretion, disable or discontinue any third party Product or Application for any reason at any time. 5.4 Use of Wireless Data Services. Sprint Wireless Data Services may be used with mobile clients for InterneVintranet access and Internet email via a standard HTML browser. Wireless Data Services may also be used with software for proxy applications, for dispatch applications, for POP3 email access, and for other uses specifically approved by Sprint Sprint may limit or suspend any heavy, continuous data usage that is adversely affecting Sprint's network performance or hindering access to the Network. For devices that allow multiple users to share one connection and subscription, the wireless performance may degrade as more Page 17 01"21 16tE4. users are added to the single wireless data device. Network speeds, including but not limited to data deiivery and latency rates, are estimates based on averages. Actual performance may vary and no minimum speed is guaranteed. Customer may not receive incoming voice calls or Push-to-talk Services (including Sprint Business Connection) while using Sprint Wireless Data Services, such as Sprint PCS Vision. Sprint Wireless Data Services may not be available when Roaming and are not currently available in certain portions of select market areas within the Sprint Networks. Customer acknowledges that use of certain Sprint Wireless Data Services, including some messaging services, can result in the disclosure to third parties of the user's email address and other information in connection with the user's Internet usage. As a result, Customer may receive advertising, warnings, alerts and other messages, including broadcast messages. 5.5 Premium Services. Access to and downloading of Premium Services is not included in the pricing in this Agreement. Even if Customer's Business Plan includes "unlimited" kilobytes of data, Customer must still pay all charges associated with access or use of Premium Services. Charges for Premium Services will be specified at the time of access or available at www.sprint.com. Data usage charges also apply to and are separate from charges for Premium Services. Certain Active Units may be blocked from or otherwise unable to use Premium Services provided by third-party content providers. In certain instances, subject to the terms of the content purchased, Sprint may delete Premium and non-Premium items downloaded to storage areas controlled by Sprint, including any pictures, games and other content. Pictures downloaded to any Sprint- maintained storage area may be deleted after 30 days. Sprint may impose a dollar or other limit on Customer's use of Premium Services in a specific timeframe (month, week, day, or other time period) based on Customer's credit. 6. SERVICE USAGE POLICIES. 6.1 Telephone Numbers And Portability. Sprint may change the telephone numbers assigned to each Customer~Liable Active Unit with reasonable prior notice for commercial reasons, such as fraud prevention, regulatory requirements, and area code changes. Customers do not have any right of possession or title to any number, e-mail address or other identifier Sprint may assign to Customer's Wireless Products or accounts. Customer may not modify, change or transfer any of these identifiers except as Sprint allows or as allowed for by law. Sprint will comply with any FCC-issued regulations that require Sprint to allow Customer to retain its assigned telephone numbers upon switching wireless service to another carrier. Before a telephone number previously used with another carrier can be used on a Sprint Network, Customer must provide information about the account with the other carrier (account name, account number, address, and social security number or tax identification number) and purchase Sprint Wireless Products from Sprint. Until the port from the previous carrier is successful, the Sprint Wireless Product will only be able to call 911 and Sprint Customer Care. Once the port is completed, Customer's old device will no longer work. However, due to system limitations and issues outside Sprint's control, some requests to port a telephone number from another carrier to Sprint, or from Sprint to another carrier, may not be successful. If a transfer to Sprint is not successful, Customer may return any Sprint Wireless Products within the return period to receive a credit, and Customer will lose or repay Sprint for any discounts or service credits provided with a returned Sprint Wireless Product or cancelled Service. Customer is responsible for all charges incurred up to the date the transfer is completed. 6.2 Lost or Stolen Wireless Product Policy. If Customer's Product is lost or stolen, Customer must promptly notify Sprint Customer Service to deactivate the Product. Customer is responsible for all service charges associated with the Product before Customer notifies Sprint of the loss or theft. Sprint may require that Customer provide evidence of the loss or theft (e.g., a police report or affidavit). If the Product is later found, Sprint may require Customer to exchange the Product for another Product before reactivating Service and, in such cases, Sprint will provide a replacement Product of similar quality at Sprint's expense. 6.3 Fraud Policy. Customer will immediately notify Sprint's Customer Care department of any suspected fraudulent use of Products or Services. Customer will cooperate with Sprint in the investigation of the incident. Sprint will attempt to contact Customer before interrupting Services in the case of suspected fraud. 7. SERVICE LIMITATIONS. 7.1 TTY Access. TTY-capable Sprint Wireless Products (also known as TOO or Text Telephone) may not function effectively when attempting 911 calls due to the iimitations of the answering agency. A TTY device should not be relied on for 911 Calls. 7.2 Pay-Per-Call Services. Sprint will not complete calls from any Product to 900, 976 and similar numbers for pay-per-call services. 7.3 International Call Blocking. International calling capability will be blocked if not expressly requested by Customer for an Active Unit. 7.4 Caller 10. Caller identification information may not be available for all incoming calls. 7.5 Product Compatibility. Page ]80f2] 16E4 A. General. Sprint Wireless Products may not be compatible with services provided by other wireless carriers, except for services provided over Sprint Affiliate networks or in connection with roaming agreements. Currently, Sprint PCS Products relying on CDMA technology do not operate on the Nextel National Network, which uses iDEN technology, and Nextel Products using iDEN technology do not currently operate on the Sprint National Network. B. PowerSource Phone. A "PowerSource Phone" is a device which provides both wireless voice and data Services over the Sprint National Network, Sprint Affiliate networks, and other networks in connection with roaming agreements (using CDMA technology) and Nextel Walkie-Talkie Services over the Nextel National Network (using iDEN technology). PowerSource Phones cannot be used for simultaneous Walkie-Talkie and wireless voice and data sessions. 7.6 911 Or Other Emergency Calls. For 911 calls, an emergency responder's ability to locate Customer through Sprint Wireless Products and Services may be affected by various factors, including but not limited to the type of Product used, lack of a GPS-enabled device, geography or other factors such as the porting process. Sprint is not liable for failures or delays in connecting to the appropriate emergency services provider. In certain circumstances, a 911 call may be routed to a state patrol dispatcher. Enhanced 911 ("E911") service that is compatible with the FCC technical requirements is not available in all areas. Customer consents to Sprint's disclosure of Customer information to governmental and public safety authorities in response to emergencies. This information may include, but is not limited to, Customer's name, address, number, and the location of the user of the Service at the time of call. 7.7 Service Affecting Conditions. Sprint is not liable for (a) coverage and service quality problems caused by atmospheric, geographic, or topographic conditions or other conditions beyond Sprint's control including the failure of other service providers; (b) interruption and unavailability of Sprint Wireless Services due to coverage, capacity, product failure or other limitations may occur in the transmission or attempted transmission of wireless services: or (c) outages or service disruptions occurring as a result of a public safety emergency. 8. Rate Adjustments. Sprint may impose fees, charges or surcharges on Customer to recover amounts that Sprint is required or permitted by governmental or quasi-governmental authorities to collect on their behalf, or to pay to others in support of statutory or regulatory programs, plus a commercially reasonable amount to recover the administrative costs associated with such charges or programs. These charges include, but are not limited to, state and federal Carrier Universal Service Charges, Compensation to Payphone Providers, E911, Telephone Relay Service, Wireless Number Pooling, and Wireless Local Number Portability. Cost recovery charges are not taxes or government required charges. Sprint may impose additional charges or surcharges to recover amounts Sprint is charged for terminating or originating a call to other wireless carriers such as international mobile termination charges. 9. WARRANTIES. EXCEPT AS, AND THEN ONLY TO THE EXTENT, EXPRESSLY PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT OR THE APPLICABLE SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT, PRODUCTS AND SERVICES ARE PROVIDED "AS IS." SPRINT DISCLAIMS ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES AND IN PARTICULAR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, AND WARRANTIES RELATED TO EQUIPMENT, MATERIAL, SERVICES, OR SOFTWARE. 10. EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE. 10.1 Products. Sprint does not manufacture Products and, except as provided in this Agreement, is not responsible for any defects in the Products or for the acts or omissions of the original equipment manufacturer. 10.2 Software Provided by Sprint. A. General Licensing Terms and Conditions. Where software is provided with a Product or Service, Customer is granted a non~exclusive and non-transferable license or sublicense to use the software, including any related documentation, solely to enable Customer to use the Products and Services in accordance with the applicable licensing requirements. Software license terms and conditions of Sprint's software vendors are provided through click and use screens, shrink-wrap notices, physical copies delivered at the time of Product or Service installation, or copies posted on the Rates and Conditions Website. Sprint may suspend, block or terminate Customer's use of any software if Customer fails to comply with any applicable licensing requirement. B. Prohibitions. Customer is not granted any right to use software on behalf of third parties or for time share or service bureau activities, or to use or obtain any source code. Customer may not reverse engineer, decompile, modify, enhance, or copy Sprint-provided software. C. Ownership. Sprint or its suppliers retain title and property rights to all software. Upon termination or expiration of the A9reement or the applicable Service, the related software license will terminate and Customer will return all copies of software to Sprint or provide certification that it has permanently deleted all Sprint-provided software from Customer-owned Equipment. Page 190f21 16E4 10.3 Responsibilities. Customer is responsible for any Customer or third party equipment located at the Customer's premises that impair Product or Service quality. Upon notice from Sprint of an impairment to the Products or Services, Customer will promptly cure the problem. Customer will continue to pay Sprint for Products and Services during such impairment or related suspension. If the impairment interferes with the use of the Sprint Networks by Sprint or third parties, Sprint, in its reasonable discretion, may suspend or disconnect the affected Products and Services without advance notice to Customer, although Sprint will provide advance notice where reasonably practical. At Customer's request, Sprint will work with the Customer to troubleshoot the source of the impairment at Sprint's then-current time and materials rates. Sprint is not liable if a commercially reasonable change in Sprint Products or Services causes equipment or software used by Customer to become obsolete, require alteration, or perform at lower levels. 11. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY. 11.1 Direct Damages. Each party's maximum liability for damages caused by its failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement (other than service disruption) is limited to: (A) proven direct damages for claims arising out of personai injury or death, or damage to real or tangible personal property, caused by the party's negligent or willful misconduct; or (B) proven direct damages for all other claims arising out of this Agreement, excluding service disruptions, not to exceed in the aggregate, in any 12 month period, an amount equal to Customer's total net payments for the affected Products and Services purchased in the 6 months prior to the event giving rise to the claim. Customer's payment obligations and Sprint's indemnification obligations under this Agreement are excluded from this provision. 11.2 Consequential Damages. NEITHER PARTY Will BE LIABLE FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR INDIRECT DAMAGES FOR ANY CAUSE OF ACTION, WHETHER IN CONTRACT OR TORT. CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, AND INDIRECT DAMAGES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, LOST PROFITS, LOST REVENUES, AND LOSS OF BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY, WHETHER OR NOT THE OTHER PARTY WAS AWARE OR SHOULD HAVE BEEN AWARE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF THESE DAMAGES. 11.3 Service Disruption. Sprint's sole liability arising from or related to Service disruption, regardless of the cause, is limited to a credit allowance equal to the proportionate charge to Customer for the period of the Service disruption. Service disruptions do not include unavailability of the Service during periods of scheduled or unscheduled network maintenance. 11.4 Unauthorized Access I Hacking. Sprint is not liable for unauthorized third party access to, or alteration, theft, or destruction of, Customer's data, programs or other information through accident, wrongful means or any other cause while such information is stored on or transmitted across the Sprint Networks. 11.5 Transmission Over Sprint Network. Sprint is not liable for any third-party content accessed through Products and Services, including but not limited to Premium Services. Sprint is not responsible for any loss, liability, damage, or expense, including attorney's fees, resulting from any third party claims alleged to arise in any way from information, data, or messages transmitted over the Sprint Networks by Customer, or by Customer's own customers or agents, including but not limited to claims for or based on: (A) libel, slander, invasion of privacy, infringement of copyright, and invasion or alteration of private records or data; (B) infringement of patents arising from the use of equipment, hardware or software not provided by Sprint; and (C) transmission and uploading of information that contains viruses, worms, or other destructive media or other unlawful content. 12. FORCE MAJEURE. Neither party will be responsible for any delay, interruption or other failure to perform under this Agreement due to acts or events beyond the reasonable control of the otherwise responsible party. Force majeure events include, but are not limited to: natural disasters (e.g. lightning, earthquakes, hurricanes, floods); wars, riots, terrorist activities, and civil commotions; inability to obtain parts or equipment from third party suppliers, cable cuts by third parties, a local exchange carrier's activities, and other acts of third parties; explosions and fires; embargoes, strikes, and labor disputes; and governmental decrees. 13. DEFINITIONS 13.1 "Active Unit" or "Line" is an active piece of wireless Product that Customer enrolls in a Business Plan under the Agreement. 13.2 "Anytime Minutes" are the Network minutes of use that are available in a Business Plan that may be used at anytime other than during Nights and Weekends. 13.3 "Business Plans" are Sprint PCS and Nextel Wireless service plans for business customers on which an Active Unit is activated. Certain Business Plan options are priced in this Agreement or Customer may select from any other available Business Plans, subject to the terms and pricing of that Plan. 13.4 "Commencement Date" is the first day of the first bill cycle in which Sprint bills monthly recurring charges or usage charges. 13.5 "Customer-Liable Active Unit" or "Customer Line" each refer to an Active Unit activated by Customer for its end use and for which Customer is financially liable. Page 20 of 21 16[4 13.6 "Domestic Roaming" means Roaming on networks within the United States, Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands where Sprint has a roaming relationship with the carrier. "Domestic Roaming Long Distance" means toll calls placed while in Domestic Roaming areas. 13.7 "Employee" means a person in the service of Customer and from whom Customer withholds FICA (Federal Insurance Contributions Act) contributions from gross pay. 13.8 "Individual-Liable Account" means the Individual-Liable Sprint Wireless Services account in the name of, and billed directly to, an Employee. "Individual-Liable Active Unit" or "Employee Line" is an Active Unit activated by an Employee and for which the Employee is financially responsible. 13.9 "Net MRC" means the net monthly recurring charge before taxes and other charges and after calculation of all other discounts, rebates, service credits or any such similar credits (not including Customer's applicable volume discount). 13.10 "Nextel National Network" means the Sprint-owned or controlled iDEN wireless network, including network owned or controlled by Nextel affiliates or partners, used by Sprint to provide Nextel Services. 13.11 "Nextel Services" means wireless services provided on the Nextel National Network by Sprint and authorized Nextel affiliates and partners. 13.12 "Nights and Weekends" means Monday through Thursday 9:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. and Friday 9:00 p.m. to Monday 7:00 a.m., unless either the Night and Weekends at 6pm option or Nights and Weekends at 7pm option is selected. "Night and Weekends at 6pm" means Monday through Thursday 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. and Friday 6:00 p.m. to Monday 7:00 a.m. "Night and Weekends at 7pm" means Monday through Thursday 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. and Friday 7:00 p.m. to Monday 7:00 a.m. The time used to determine Nights and Weekends eligibility is the local time where the Product is located when an inbound or outbound call originates 13.13 llPremium Services" means downloads and applications, such as games, ringers and screen savers, available through Sprint Wireless Data Services that are above and beyond basic data usage. 13.14 "Roaming" means voice or data service provided on another wireless carrier's network through agreements established by Sprint. 13.15 "Sprint PCS Affiliate" means independent third parties that by contract offer Sprint PCS Products and Services under the Sprint Marks. "Sprint PCS Affiliate Market" means the regions of the United States covered by Sprint PCS Affiliates. 13.16 "Sprint PCS Services" means wireless services provided on the Sprint National Network using COMA technology by Sprint and authorized Sprint PCS Affiliates. 13.17 "Sprint National Network" means the Sprint-owned or controlled COMA wireless network, including network owned or controlled by Sprint PCS Affiliates, used by Sprint to provide Sprint PCS Services. Page 21 of 21 16E4 A CORO,. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I DATE (MMIDDIYYYY) 4/1/2008 2/28/2008 PRODUCER Locktan Companies, LLC-I Kansas City THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION 444 W. 47th Street, Suite 900 ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR Kansas City MO 64112-1906 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. (816) 960.9000 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURED SPRINT CORPORA TION/ INSURER A: CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO. (A XV) 14971 SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INe. INSURER B: AMERICAN CASUAL TV CO.ofReading,PA 6480 SPRINT P ARKW A Y INSURER c: TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE CO.(A XV) OVERLAND PARK KS 66251 GREAT AMERlCAN ASSURANCE CO. INSURER 0: , INSURER E: nlls CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING COVERAGES SPReaD 1 DE INSURER(5), AUTHORIZED REf'RESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR ~,~D' POLICY NUMBER Pa>1+~~~~~6gmf Pg~!fJ'I~~~~N LIMITS LTR NSR TYPE OF INSURANCE GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 2 000 000 A 'x COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY GL 20 7959 3819 4/1/2005 4/1/2008 ~~~~~~I9E~~~~~~ncei $ XXXXXXX f- tJ CLAIMS MADE 0 OCCUR XXXXXXX MED EXP (Anyone person) $ 'x CONTRACTUAL PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 2.000.000 'x *TENANTS LEGAL LIAB GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 10,000,000 f- 3,000.000 GEN'l AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ ~ nPRO nlOC X POllCY JECT ~TOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 2.000.000 A ~ ANY AUTO BVA 20 7959 3836 4/1/2005 4/1/2008 (Eaaccident) - All OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ XXXXXXX - SCHEDULED AUTOS - HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ XXXXXXX - NON-OWNED AUTOS - PROPERTY DAMAGE $ XXXXXXX (Per accident} ~RAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ XXXXXXX ANY AUTO NOT APPLICABLE OTHER THAN EAACC $ XXXXXXX AUTO ONLY: AGG $ XXXXXXX EXCESS/UMBRELLA LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 10.000000 D ~ OCCUR D CLAIMS MADE UMB5655283 4/1/2007 4/1/2008 AGGREGATE $ 10000000 $ XXXXXXX =1 DEDUCTIBLE o UMBRELLA $ XXXXXXX FORM RETENTION $ $ XXXXXXX WORKERS COMPENSATION AND WC 20 7959 3786 (AOS) 4/1/2005 4/l/2008 X I we STATU. I 10TH. B TORY LIMITS ER EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY C ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE WC 20 7959 3772 (AZ.OR, WI) 4/1/2005 4/1/2008 E.L EACH ACCIDENT $ J ,000.000 B OFFICERiMEMBER EXCLUDED? WC 20 7959 3805 (CA) 4/1/2005 . 4/1/2008 EL DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000 B If yes, describe under NO K/A IN MONOPOLISTIC STATE SPECIAL PROVISIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ ],000,000 OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS {'lOCATIONS I VEHICLES I EXCL.USIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT f SPECIAL PROVISIONS *FlRE DAMAGE IS INCLUDED IN BROADER TENANT'S LEGAL LIABILITY FORM WITH LIMITS OF $1,000,000 PER OCCURRENCE. COLLIER COUNTY IS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED, AND SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, WHERE REQUIRED BY CONTRACT AND SUBJECT TO POLICY TERMS AND CONDITIONS. CERTIFICATE HOLDER 3578108 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIOr--TERS A TIN, L YN M. WOOD C.P.M. 3301 T AMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES FL 34112 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHOR PRESENTATIVE ACORD 25 (2001/08) Forquesllons regarding this certifica1e, contact Ihe number listeol in the 'Prooluc er'seclionaboveandspecifylheclie ode' ,,'; ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 F'1' . TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENr TO TEE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMrSSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE . . Prim on pink paper. Att1d1 '" origioaldN-mn-' Origioal rl~m_" 3lIouJd be IwId delivered '" tbc Board 0tIice. Thtcomploled ","liDg ,Up and original rl~-",,""'betbtwmled"'tbcBoardotlio:onIy~1!IaBoaaIhu_aclioII.OIltbci-') . . .. .. .. ..... ROUTING SLIP . .Comph:oo roaIing IiDcs Illllrouglll4 as ~ tix addililml nglWllXO!, -. mdlor iD!acnation aeeded.1t tbc .......;,_; i.! aI=dy compleo: with tbc =donaftbcn",;,."""", . dnw.1inc throul!l -~ _'1 <IIron.m 114, """",!eo: tbc <:IJe::klbt; md ti:nvd '" S... fiJ!aa (liDo 115). . Route to Addressee(s) . Office Initials Date (Ibr in ","au ardor) " - . L' ... -. ---------..... . -- z. ---.~ ------ .~. "- 3. '. -~ , '. . -'.. '- - -- -. 4. ....-..... --~~ 5. Sue FIlson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners . 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office - PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION ('!be primary COI1CICt i.! tbc bolder of tbc origiDal rl~-' p=ding Bee approval. Nonmtlly me primary COlI",", i.! tbc p"",on who =:m:dIJn'PlUCd tbc executive !lUIlDIlIry. Primary - ilzfcnnatiCl1 i.! - iD tbc CVCIU ace of tbc oddr== >bow. iDclw:!ing Sue Rlscn. l1=! '" <;llltlCt mff tix addiJ:ioaal or orissing iDfcrm:uico. All origiJW d<>:umc1.. ccoriiDg tbc Bee CllaUmm's sigllll_ ow '" be dcUvc=I '" me Bee office only _ tbc BCe bu lU:lCd '" approve me item.) Name of Primary Staff ! 1.. Contact I . Ii "-(,- <- Agenda Dare Item wa:s ved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Phone Number t 7 Y 3 0' r I Agenda Item Number c:;, c;J (,. I, Fol {' (- Number of Original Documents Attached fl I" I oj I 1 -'-<_. I 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in tile Not Applicable column. whichever is Yes N/A (Not . ce. (Initial) licable) Original document has been signedfmitialed for legal sUfficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with !he exception of most Ieaers, must be reviewed and signed liy tile Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances. . resolutions, etc. signed by the County AlIorney's Office and signature pages from I\~ contracts, llgI'el:ml:nts, etc. tbat have been fully executed by all parties except tile BeC Chairman and Clerk: to the Board and I State Officials.) All halldwritten.strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney: s r /\ Office and all other arties the BCC Cb.airman and the Clc:rk to the Board . {i -,...\. The ChaiIlpan's signature line date ha:s been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the '_____ document or the final ne dated contract date whichever is Iicable. tv, "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si and initials are r In most ca:ses (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue FUson in the BCC office within 24 houn ofBCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to T.IT.h"see within a cc:rtain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be a of our ,i~.,iHn",,! The docmnent was approved by the BCC on.) ._' u t' (enter date) and all changes made durUsg the meeting have been incorpo in the attached document. The Coon Attorn's Office bas reviewed the as, if a licable. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. l: FomW County _ Bee FonmI Original Documc:Ia Rooricg Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, RcvUcd 2.24.0:1 16ff ~ MEMORANDUM Date: February 26, 2008 To: Michael Dowling, Property Management Specialist Real Estate Services From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Fifth Amendment to a Lease Agreement with Gulf Shore Associates, Limited Partnership Attached please find the original document, as referenced above (Agenda Item #16Fl) approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. After forwardinl! to the appropriate party for signature, please return the fully executed oril!inal to the Minutes and Records Department where it will be kept as part of the Board's permanent record. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-8411, Thank you. Attachments (1) 16Fl Lease #744 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT --p~ THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT entered into this co2 (,.; day of re 6Lco:"L y , 2008 at Naples, Collier County, Florida by and between Gulf Shore Associates, LimIted Partnership, whose address is 1300 Post Road East, Westport, Connecticul 06880, hereinafter referred to as "LESSOR", and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the Stale of Florida, whose mailing address is 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112, hereinafter referred to as "LESSEE". WITNESSETH WIIEREAS, Collier County and Gulf Shore Associates have previously entered into a Lease Agreement dated March 31, 1992, an Amendment to Lease Agreement dated February 6, 1996, a Second Amendment to Lease Agreement dated February 25, 2003, a Third Amendment to Lease Agreement dated April 27, 2004, and a Fourth Amendment to Lease Agreement dated February 14, 2006. WIIEREAS, the LESSOR and LESSEE are desirous of amending the Lease Agreement, Amendment To Lease Agreement, Second Amendment to Lease Agreement, Third Amendment to Lease Agreement, and the Fourth Amendment to Lease Agreement, and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements provided within said Fourth Amendment to Lease Agreement dated February 14, 2006, and Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, said Lease Agreement is hereby amended as follows: I. The following provision shall be added to Article 2 of the Amendment to Lease Agreement: This Lease is hereby extended until February 28,201 I, hereinafter referred to as 'Renewal Lease Term.' LESSEE hereby acknowledges that LESSOR has provided response to its request to extend the Lease tenn. LESSEE shall have the right to renew this lease. following the February 28, 2011, Renewal Lease Term, for one (I) additional term of three (3) years, hereinafter referred to a 'Option Term'. LESSEE shall have the right, however, to terminate this Lease, with or without cause, by providing 180 day prior written notice of such termination to LESSOR at the address set forth above. Said notice period shall be effective upon receipt by LESSOR of the written notice. The base rent for the period of February 29, 2008, to February 28, 2009, shall be $1,799.00 per month. The base rent for each year following the first year of the Renewal Lease Term shall be increased by four percent, compounded, each year throughout the life of the Renewal Lease Term and Option Term. The LESSEE is tax exempt. The Common Area Maintenance rCAM') fees commencing as of March 1,2008 shall be $1,000.00 per month. If LESSOR is required to increase the CAM during the life of this Lease, the LESSOR shall notifY LESSEE, in writing, of any increase by March 31 of each year throughout the life of the Lease. 2. Except as expressly provided herein, the Lease Agreement between Gulf Shore Associates, Limited Partnership and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, for the utilization of the Demised Premises described in said Lease Agreemenl dated March 3 I, 1992 remains in full force and effect according to the terms and conditions contained therein, and said terms and conditions are applicable hereto except as expressly provided otherwise herein. 16Fl IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the LESSOR and LESSEE have hereto executed this Fifth Amendment to Lease Agreement the day and year first above written. AS TO THE LESSEE: DATED: 0./...2(" ) 0 '( ATTES~;: . . . , . .DWIGHT E.B~.pCK, Clerk :-'~:~~ . Deputy~Ierk ',' Att.,~ It ~..CNlrwa , "i-! QIlltwr"Olil. . , '.!: ~;.~; \. ~ .' . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIE:JPUNTY, LORID~ BY:~ Tom Henning - Chairman AS TO THE LESSOR: DATED: -_._-~._~-- Florida corporation GULF SHORE ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP by its General Partner, Pequol Capital South, Inc., a BY: ALBERT J. KLEBAN, President Witness (Signature) (Print Name) -, Witness (Signature) (Print Name) Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: _~~<_9.~ . ~.j::'Ni0L?~ f\.6fL-PED:rO '6 f\ s S~ .., -n'\ tV \' CO J (\.) 11/ t\, fTD e 10 t_ Y 2 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 r TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO ") THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE . <; Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or infonnation needed. If the document is already complete with the exceotion of the Chainnan's sirnature, draw a line throUf!:t routio2lines #1 through #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routing order) l. ..-------.. . " 2. "------._-_._~_. ----..--.---.. --.. 3. -- .'.-, --....- ".. 4. <~~..,~---_..._--- ___ ___.m__"'_ .. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners c'4(' :J ht,,/D ~ 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office -*~d (v'h noS O:..'K'" .u..dl .. , ) PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item.) Name of Primary Staff Contact Agenda Date Item was A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached 1. '.') (~IC" I \ \ ~) ll\ (O.:JlC,Vl ~::~:~t~~~~~:~d (i .. Sc, n l~';SWmCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a fa nate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossihly State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the fmal ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aw e of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on (enter date) and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated 'in t e attached document. The Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable. . Phone Number . , ,--- LI17"LL'C:~'. I' fl ,(-i., ! I" . " ILF-.~ ,.,-) i Agenda Item Number Yes (Initial) N/A(Not A licable) 2. ~.. ~t ( r 3. (' iV' I"" C'{iC: 4. 5. cw~ Cj4(' 6. I: Forms! County Forms! BCe Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1_26.05, Revised 2.24.05 MEMORANDUM Date: February 27,2008 To: Christine Chase Emergency Management From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Grant Application Enclosed please find a original, as referenced above, (Agenda Item #16F2), approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. If you should have any questions, please ca11252-8411. Thank you, Enclosure (I) 16F2 ~, ~~ CHARLESH.BRONSON COMMISSIONER Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Forestry VOLUNTEER FIRE ASSISTANCE GRANT APPLICATION . 16F2 LEGAL NAME Collier Count Board of Commissioners ADDRESS FORM OF ORGANIZA liON: (Municipal, Fire District, Non-Profit, County) Ochopee Fire Control District P.O.box 70 CITY IF COUNTY, LIST VFD'S BENEFITING FROM GRANT: STATE COUNTY EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN) IS FIRE DEPARTMENT LOCATED IN AN INCORPORATED TOWN? WHAT IS THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ISO RATING? I YES 0 NO jfl IF YES, NAME OF TOWN: I 7 POPULATION OF TOWN: i IS FIRE DEPARTMENT NIMS COMPLIANT? YES 4l: NO 0 CURRENT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH DOF? YES,g. NO 0 PROTECTED AREA: EST. POPULA TlON:1 SIZE: (So. MILES)r:-:-::- 4,100 1,10 DISTANCE OF CLOSEST MUTUAL AID FIRE DEPARTMENT:I 32 NAME OF FIRE DEPARTMENT: I In"", N~n1", NUMBER OF FIREFIGHTERS: PAID: r;:; VOLUNTEERS: ~ HAS APPLICANT RECEIVED GRANT FUNDS FROM ANY SOURCE IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS? YES 0 NOJi) NO. OF INCIDENTS PAST YEAR: WILDLAND FIRE:rn- OTHER: r684 IF YES, WHERE? I NO. OF FIREFIGHTERS CERTIFIED AS: AMOUNT: $ 1 WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER' r20 WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER II r- LIST TOTAL FUNDS RECEIVED FROM OTHER TAXING AUTHORITIES SUCH AS CITY, COUNTY, TAXING DISTRICTS (Past 12 Months) AMOUNT, $ I LIST OF FJREFIGHTING VEHICLES: TYPE engine 2 engine rus Brush PUMP CAPACITY (GPM) WATER CAPACITY (GAL) 1000 1000 750 ESTIMATED GRANT FUNDING REQUEST: LIST OF EQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES TO PURCHASE WITH GRANT FUNDS: FEDERAL $ 5,220 NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT APPLICANT $ :>,.<.<u 7u C.1ass A Loam u-.v.vv COUNTY $ ~u Wl.1u.canu C.10Ullng se~s ':J,uvv. TOTAL $ ~u, (Federal nol more than 50% of total. Applicant at least 50% of total in matching funds.) o We understand that this is a 50 percent maximum cost~share program (Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978. PL 954313), and that funds on deposit up to 50 percent of the actual purchase price of the items approved will be committed to our project. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, ALL DATA IN THIS APPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT HAS DULY AUTHORIZED THIS DOCUMENT. Title Chainnan of Board Board of County C Date Signed and Submitted J/J("/o~ Telephone Number: ( 2 3 9 6 9 5- L.lll'" sW:opers) J 1 (1- 'G / '1"'/71 EmaiJ: ::. _. : " ...~:'(, ':.;:~~: '.' .. ~,.)~ i;~J ;~~;!~~':;p"~r . ';:;~f'\"'u . ('~ ~gK"; ':"; . 'j:'~'(j.C' :~,,:.v."':, ,,~ ~~{~_\o ~l"'" 11 16F2 OMB Approval No. 0348..0040 Note: ASSURANCES -- NON-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS Certain of these assurances may not be applicable to your project or program. If you have questions, please contact the awarding agency. Further, certain Federal awarding agencies may require applicants to certify to additional assurances. If such is the case, you will be notified. As the duly authorized representative of the aoolicant I certify that the aoolicant 1. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance, and the institutional, managerial and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of project costs) to ensure proper planning, management and completion of the project described in this application. 2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States, and if appropriate, the State, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the award; and will establish a proper accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards or agency directives. 3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain. 4. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time frame after receipt of approval of the awarding agency. 5. Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S.c. !Is 4728A763) relating to prescribed standards for merit systems for programs funded under one of the nineteen statutes or regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit System of Personnel Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F). 6. Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a)Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.c. 9* 1681-1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.c. 9 794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicaps; (d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.c. 9* 6101.6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; (e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92- 255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; (f) the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; (g) 9* 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.c. 290-dd.3 and 290 ee-3), as amended, relating to contidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records; (h) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. I 3601 et seq.), as amended, relating 10 nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing; (1) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being made; and U) the requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application. 7. Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements of Titles II and III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 961-646) which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of Federal or federally assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal participation in purchases. 8. Will comply with the provisions of the Health Act (5 U.S.c. 99 1501~1508 and 7324-7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds. 9. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis- Bacon Act (40 U.S.c. II 276a to 276a-7), the Copeland Act (40 U.S.c. I 276c and 18 U.S.c. II 874), and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.s.c. II 327-333), regarding labor standards for federally assisted construction subagreements. 10. Will comply, if applicable, with flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102 (a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires recipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and acquisition of $1 0,000 or more. 11. Will comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; (b) notification of violating facilities pursuant to EO 11738; (c) protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; (d) evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with EO 11988; (e) assurance of project consistency with the approved State management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 D.S.C. ~~ 1451 et seq.); (f) conformity of Federal actions to State (Clear Air) Implementation Plans under Section I 76(c) of the Clear Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.c. * 7401 et seq.); (g) protection of underground sources of drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended, (P.L. 93.523); and (h) protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, (P.L 93-205). 12. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.c. S~ 1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system. V, 8.5 (02/05) Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Fonn 424B (9.03)prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 13. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.c. 470), EO 11593 (identification and protection of historic properties), and the Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.c. 469a-1 et seg.). research, teaching, or other activities supported by this award of assistance. 26F2 16. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.s.c. ii 4801 et seg.) which prohihits the use of lead hased paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures. 14. Will comply with P.L. 93.348 regarding the protection of human subjects involved in research, development, and related activities supported by this award of assistance. 17. Will cause to be performed the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984. IS. Will comply with the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (P.L. 89-544, as amended, 7 U.S.c. 2131 et seq.) pertaining to the care, handling, and treatment of warm blooded animals held for 18. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other Federal laws, executive orders, regulations and policies governing this program. TITLE Ill" Hl'llt\lf'!\ Chairman, Boar~of County Commissione s APPLICANT ORGANIZATION DATE SUBMITTED Q/i.' Ie> r ,<f i.~1n~_'_ .'.~. ,.). .' 'y~nS . V,' t"!....!"\'"'" {i,'-r'i.I~'h" (ft.'J., ~~~;~V~\Z~, . Attest u to ~1.~ t,", siQn.!tltril Of1\ ......\....." ",,-".,""';j' V,B-6(02/05) '. 4"!t .... '..," .~f~~ed for Local Reproduction) ". U "".1",_.;1, .~;'" StandardForm424B (9-03 ",! '.'''.~~.'~!.., l' Prescribed by OMB Circular A-I02 , 0- ....);, .. ""1 ,1~ J,6F2 Form AD-] 047 (1/92) us. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters - Primary Covered Transactions This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension, 7 CFR Part 3017, Section 3017.510, Participants' responsibilities. The regulations were published as Part IV of the January 30,1989, Federal R"ister(pages 4722.4733), Copies of the regulations may be obtained by contacting the Department of Agriculture agency offering the proposed covered transaction. (Before completing certIfIcation, read Instructions on reverse.) OJ The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: (a) are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (b) have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or Local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or Local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph O)(b) of this certification; and (d) have not within a three. year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or Local) terminated for cause or default. (2) Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. ORGANIZATION NAME PRlA WARD NUMBER OR PROJECT NAME Collier County Board of County Ochopee Fire Control District Comnissioners NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE DATE .' I' "-... .... ">';;J/JL/e ?: _ ... . ~~.i: " . n ,-". ,... ',.', . "LX;j _..~7!1~.. "EST.!.: .~ ','n \ '~'~G:;i::: ':::~~~G~ 'k ~,...~ ,f.o'ClWll'WM' i1l1i1.t.... 'JIt1 ~ 07 /" " /( ,... , ;) ..... Form AD-1047 11/92) (REVERSE) INSTRUCTIONS FOR CERTIFICATION 1. By signing and submitting this form, the prospective primary participant is providing the certification set out on the reverse side in accordance with these instructions. 2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out on this form. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the prospective primary participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualifY such person from participation in this transaction. 3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective primary participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default. 4. The prospective primary participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to whom this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 5. The terms "covered transaction," "debarred," "suspended," tlineligible," "lower tier covered transaction," "participant," "person," "primary covered transaction," "principal," "proposal, tl and tlvoluntarily excluded," as used in this clause, have the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of the rules implementing Executive Order 12549. You may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. 6. The prospective primary participant agrees by submitting this form that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction. 7. The prospective primary participant further agrees by submitting this form that it will include this clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion _ Lower Tier Covered Transactions," provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions. 8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification ofa prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each participant may, but is not required to, check the Nonprocurement List. 9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in lhe ordinary course of business dealings. 10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default. 2 16F2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve the submittal of a Volunteer Fire Assistance grant application to the Florida Division of Forestry for the purchase of wild land firefighting equipment and protective clothing. OBJECTIVE: To obtain Board of County Commissioners approval of an application for a Volunteer Fire Assistance matching (50/50) grant for the purchase of wild land firefighting equipment and protective clothing. CONSIDERATIONS: Ochopee Fire Rescue District has received this type of grant from the Division of Forestry in past years. The grant has been used to purchase equipment to improve firefighter safety and firefighting capabilities. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of the equipment requested this year is $10,440. As this is a 50/50 matching grant, the Division of Forestry will pay $5,220 leaving the Ochopee Fire Rescue District to provide $5,220 from the contingencies line of Fund 144 (Ochopee Fire Rescue). Following award, budget amendments will be needed in order to transfer funds to Fund 118, Emergency Management and Fire Grants. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management Impact associated with this Executive Summary. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to sign the Florida Division of Forestry Volunteer Fire Assistance Grant application and approve the budget amendments needed upon award of the grant. Prepared Bv: Alan McLaul!hlin, Interim Fire Chief ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 1 6 F TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 3 'l"\j THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE . Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the excention of the Chairman's sie:nature, draw a line throulrl1 routing lines #1 throulZh #4, comnlete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #51- Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routin9" order1 1. -- . 2. -.-." 3. -- --., . 4. " 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners I~ /}(1 c")!d-W /tfJ 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing information. All original documents needing the BCC Chairman's signature are to be delivered to the BCC office only after the BeC has acted to approve the item. 6. hI \<...H ..~C\l,,(~<:'() ':). :) lo ua Gn:l'''-: \~ ')\\'cc,',t(CY\ ~::~~~t~~~~~:~d C' (' ex. ~\.U'l""o-,~j lNSTRUCTlONS & CHECKLIST itial the Yes column or mark "N/ A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are re aired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on I' (enter date) and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporatell in t e attached document. The Count Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable. Phone Number ell '?I.ocn'-) /GF3 Name of Primary Staff Contact Agenda Date Item was A roved b the BCC Type of Document Attached Agenda Item Number 'X rred QvilroQ Ve...-kc Yes (Initial) N/A (Not A licable) 1. r ':~ 2. ,"', 3. ("~ " .....~IIl'_.. ,,::it:::. 4. 5. C:f\C ,.1\/? .11==-- I: Forms! County Forms! BCe Formsl Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Origina19.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 16 --.... If ,) MEMORANDUM Date: February 27,2008 To: Christine Chase Emergency Management From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Grant Application Enclosed please find a original, as referenced above, (Agenda Item #16F3), approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. If you should have any questions, please call 252-8411. Thank you. Enclosure (1) . Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Forestry VOLUNTEER FIRE ASSISTANCE GRANT APPLICATION 16F3 . f:''t- CHARLES H. BRONSON COMMISSIONER LEGAL NAME FORM OF ORGANIZATION: (Municipal, Fire District. Non-Profit, County) t Board of Commissioners ADDRESS 175 Ca ri Blvd. CITY Na les STATE ZIP FL 34113 COUNTY COUNTY # Isles of Capri Fire Rescue District IF COUNTY, LIST VFO'S BENEFITING FROM GRANT EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN) IS FIRE DEPARTMENT LOCATED IN AN INCORPORATED TOWN? YES D NO [lJ IF YES. NAME OF TOWN POPULATION OF TOWN: I PROTECTED AREA EST POPULA nON I 3,200 SIZE (SO M/LES)I 19 WHAT IS THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ISO RATING? i 4 IS FIRE DEPARTMENT NIMS COMPLIANT? YESltJ NO D CURRENT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH DOF? YES ISl NO D DISTANCE OF CLOSEST MUTUAL AID FIRE DEPARTMENT I 3 NAME OF FIRE DEPARTMENT I Marco Island NUMBER OF FIREFIGHTERS' PAID: fl2 VOLUNTEERS' NO. OF INCIDENTS PAST YEAR WILDLAND FIRE~ OTHER NO_ OF FIREFIGHTERS CERTIFIED AS WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER I fl3 r-s I73l HAS APPLICANT RECEIVED GRANT FUNDS FROM ANY SOURCE IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS? YES KI NO D IF YES, WHERE? I Di v. of Forestry AMOUNT S I 1670.00 LIST TOTAL FUNDS RECEIVED FROM OTHER TAXING AUTHORITIES SUCH AS CITY, COUNTY, TAXING DISTRICTS (Past 12 Months) AMOUNT $ I WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER 1/ ~ LIST OF FIREFIGHTING VEHICLES TYPE MAKEIYR.MODEL PUMP CAPACITY (GPM) WATER CAPACITY (GAL.) Enoine E-One 2005 Typhoon 1500 780 Enaine E-One 2005 Tvohoon 1500 780 Brush Humvee 1997 250 310 ESTIMATED GRANT FUNDING REQUEST: LIST OF eQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES TO PURCHASE WITH GRANT FUNDS: FEDERAL S 2,392.00 NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT APPLICANT $ 2.1Q? 00 12 Wildland Interface Coats 3204.00 COUNTY $ 5 Fire Shelters 1160.00 TOTAL $ 4 784.00 30 Gallons Class A Foam 420.00 (Federal not more than 50% of total Applicant at least 50% of total in matching funds.) We understand that this is a 50 percent maximum cost-share program (Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978, PL 95-313), and that funds on deposit up to 50 percent of the actual purchase price of the items approved will be committed to our project. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, ALL DATA IN THIS APPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT HAS DULY AUTHORIZED THIS DOCUMENT. Type Name of Authorized Representative Title Chainnan, Collier County Board of County Telephone Numbe~"(';;3Cj;!~'394--8nO ", .-" 'j". ';. _':~. r" " ' FAX ( .r - - .. .:;") ~. - ~ "." '. Date Signed and Submitted Email: J /:J L.l (51\ ""~1f1~.i':} AS'] '.:;"'".' ";J '.. "";~';r; '';1 ~, ~. " ".'~ ~.~i~~~.[ 16F3 -. OM8 Approval No. 0348-0040 Note: ASSlJRANCES - '<ON-CO'<STRtCTlON PROGRA~S Certain of these assurances may not be applicable to your project or program. If you have questions. please contact the awarding agency. Further. certain Federal awarding agencies may require applicants to certify to additional assurances. If such is the case, you will be notified. As the dulv authorized renresentative of the annlicant I certify that the aoolicant: I. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance. and the institutional. managerial and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of project costs) to ensure proper planning, management and completion of the project described in this application. 2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States, and if appropriate, the State, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the award; and will establish a proper accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards or agency directives. 3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational contlict of interest. or personal gain. 4. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time frame after receipt of approval of the awarding agency. 5. Will compl)' with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. ~~ 4728-4763) relating to prescribed standards for merit systems tor programs funded under one of the nineteen statutes or regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit System of Personnel Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F). 6. Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a)Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.c. ~~ 1681-1683, and 1685-1686), Vvhich prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.c. ~ 794). which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicaps; (d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.c. ~~ 6101-6107). which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age: (e) the Drug Abuse Oflice and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92- 255). as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse: (I) the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-616), as amended. relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism: (g) ~~ 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U .S.c. 290-dd-3 and 290 ee-3). as amended. relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records: (h) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.e. ~ 3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination in the sale. rental or tinancing of housing: (I) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the spccitic statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being made; and U) the requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application. 7. Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements of Titles II and III of the Unifonn Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Pol. 96J~646) which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of Federal or federally assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal participation in purchases. 8. Will comply with the provisions of the Health Act (5 U.S.c. ~~ 1501-1508 and 7324.7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds. 9. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis- Bacon Act (40 U.S.c. ~~ 276a to 276a.7). the Copeland Act (40 lJ.S.c. ~ 276c and 18 U.S.c. ~~ 874), and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.s.c. ~~ 327-333), regarding labor standards for federally assisted construction subagreements. 10. Will comply. if applicable, with tlood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102 (a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires recipients in a special tlood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and acquisition of$10,000 or more. II. Will comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; (h) notification of violating facilities pursuant to EO 11738: (c) protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; (d) evaluation offload hazards in floodplains in accordance with EO 11988: (e) assurance of project consistency with the approved State management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 USe. ~~ 1451 et seq.); (t) conformity of Federal actions to State (Clear Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Ch.:ar Air Act of 1955. as amended (42 U.S.e. ~ 7401 et scq.): (g) protection of underground sources of drinking "ater under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974. as amended_ (P.L. 93~52J): and (h) protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. as amended, (P.L. 93-205). 12. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 USe. ~~ 1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system. V, 8-5 (02105) Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form 4248 (9-03)prescribed by OMS Circular A.l02 13. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 V.S.c. 470). EO 11593 (identitication and protection of historic properties). and the Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.c. 4690-1 et seq.). 14. Will comply with P.L. 93~348 regarding the protection of human subjects involved in research. development. and related activities supported by this award of assistance. 15. Will comply with the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (P.L. 89-544. as amended. 7 U.S.c. 2131 et seq.) pertaining to the care, handling. and treatment of warm blooded animals held for CERTIFYI~G OFFICIAL APPLICANT ORGANIZATION Collier Count Board of Count commissioners .' (~iJ)i",,_S...'." '.:EL.'.'.m~r~~iC) --1..:~f11 Ass;;. . t",~~':j ~;.. I:LL.J(fi21 16 F 3 j~ research, teaching. or other activities supported by this award of assistance. 16. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.c. ** 4801 et seq.) which prohibits the use of lead based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures. 17. Will cause to be performed the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984. 18. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other Federal laws. executive orders. regulations and policies governing this program. TITLE 'Ion, I b\\ \\ I\.(\ Chairman, Boardl of County Corrmissioners DATE / I SUBMITTED ') ,)J, (J' :'.-(" "';,i ': . 'f') ~,,"(\ J..:. "'~'~:"~6 ~.R~.8tl .~ , -, Att.,t IS to ~I~ , 'j-"tlOt't ..I ~,;., .....' .., ,:-? v, 8-6 (02/05) II T' ';~1 ~.,...A~forLocaIReproductlon) ,j'.. ),: J . Standard Form 4248 (9-03 Prescribed by OMS Circular A-I 02 " 16F3 " Form AD-1047 (J/92) u. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters. Primary Covered Transactions This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, Dcbarment and Suspension, 7 CFR Part 3017, Section 3017.510, Participants' responsibilities. The regulations were published as Part IV of the January 30. 1989, Federal Rel1ister(pages 4722-4733). Copies of the regulations may be obtained by contacting the Department of Agriculture agency offering the proposed covered transaction. (Before completing certification, read instructions on reverse) (I) The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: (a) are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (b) have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or Local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or Local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (I)(b) of this certification; and (d) have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or Local) terminated for cause or default. (2) Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. ORGANIZA TION NAME Collier County Board of County Corrmissioners PRlA WARD NUMBER OR PROJECTNAME Isles of Capri Fire Rescue District ,VAME AND TlTLE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Tom Henning Chairman DATE '"JhL, /o'~ .r,' , . . '~~. h",.:: I .~." \,\.. ~;, ",J ,..y..-, ..,.} . .,:~1,~" i 1/::1 .' .....:. _ 'r.';' ,..,'-, r't","i~"';. '.--C i \~. t_l ";~'~('.',5'''~~ 0L ~ -'--. __:.. ..' " ',_. .\<,:. . 'V ""C. ~ a,~pilt~,,\.>, , '11 J....~t~\l,~~~.'~' ~ . l6F3 Form AD-I047 (J/92)(REVER5E) INSTRUCTIONS FOR CERTIFICATION 1. By signing and submitting this form, the prospective primary participant is providing the certification set out on the reverse side in accordance with these instructions. 2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out on this form. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However. failure of the prospective primary participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualifY such person from participation in this transaction. 3. The certification in this clause is a material representation offact upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective primary participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default. 4. The prospective primary participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to whom this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 5. The terms "covered transaction," "debarred," "suspended," lIineligible," "lower tier covered transaction," "participant," "person," "primary covered trarisacticin," "principal," "proposal," and "voluntarily excluded," as used in this clause, have the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of the rules implementing Executive Order 12549. You may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. 6. The prospective primary participant agrees by submitting this form that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction. 7. The prospective primary participant further agrees by submitting this form that it will include this clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Covered Transactions," provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions. 8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each participant may, but is not required to, check the Nonprocurement List. 9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment ofa system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. 10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default. 2 16F3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve the submittal of a Volunteer Fire Assistance grant application to the Florida Division of Forestry for the purchase of wild land firefighting equipment and protective clothing. OBJECTIVE: To obtain Board of County Commissioners approval of an application for a Volunteer Fire Assistance matching (50/50) grant for the purchase of wild land firefighting equipment and protective clothing. CONSIDERATIONS: Isles of Capri Fire Rescue District has received this type of grant from the Division of Forestry in past years, including $1,670 awarded in 2007 and $4,777 awarded in 2006. The grant has been used to purchase equipment to improve firefighter safety and firefighting capabilities. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of the equipment requested this year is $4,784. As this is a 50/50 matching grant, the Division of Forestry will pay $2,392 leaving the Isles of Capri Fire Rescue District to provide $2,392 from the contingencies line of Fund 144 (Isles of Capri Fire Rescue). Following award, budget amendments will be needed in order to transfer funds to Fund 118, Emergency Management and Fire Grants. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management Impact associated with this Executive Summary. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to sign the Florida Division of Forestry Volunteer Fire Assistance Grant application and approve the budget amendments needed upon award of the grant. Prepared Bv: Emilio Rodril!:uez. Fire Chief 1661 MEMORANDUM Date: February 27,2008 To: David L. Jackson Executive Director/CRA 2408 Lindwood Ave, Suite 7 Unit II Naples, Florida 34112 From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Agenda Item #16Gl: Amendment to Extend Grant Agreement Attached, for your records, please find one certified copy as referenced above (Agenda Item #16Gl) approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. The Minutes & Records Department has retained an original document for the record. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 774-8411. Thank you, Attachments .1:\8"" IG('; i I'Uj/l"lAMI Fl:=0>Zy ( Z""g> VnlUIIVT'O G AMENDMENT TO EXTEND GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BAYSHORE GATEWAY 1 TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND OWNER FOR SITE IMPROVEMENT GRANT COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION THIS AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT ENTERED into this 26th day of February 2008 by and between the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency (hereinafter referred to as "CRA") and Phillip and Debra Pierce (hereinafter referred to as "Owner") (collectively, the "Parties"). WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS, Owner has previously applied for and entered into an approved Site Improvement Grant Agreement for property located at 3] 44 Pine Tree Drive in the amount of$7,055.00 dollars; and WHEREAS, the Owner has requested an extension of the time to complete construction of Site Improvemenls under that Agreement due to construction and permitting related delays. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenanls contained herein and other valuable consideration, the Parties agree as follows: I. Owner agrees to complete the construction of the Site Improvements no later than April 30, 2008, and all other terms of the Parties' Agreement will remain in effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment to Agreement on the date and ss Sign tff'e 'bvf;:ANOI( ~v181R[)N C Printed/Typed Name O:lL2 <=--.. (I) By: (2) Witness Signa e D~ .:.cl L. JS\c.k.rDY\ Printedrryped.Nawe , :.y..' .... ..........'j;. Debra Pierce Printed/Typed Nam€ '~ COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOP NT AGENCY 1664 MEMORANDUM Date: February 27,2008 To: David L. Jackson Executive Director/CRA 2408 Lindwood Ave, Suite 7 Unit 11 Naples, Florida 34112 From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Agenda Item #16G4: Grant Agreement Attached, for your records, please find one certified copy as referenced above (Agenda Item #16G4) approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. The Minutes & Records Department has retained an original document for the record. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 774-8411. Thank you, Attachments 2008 GRANT AGREEMENT oKiG IN AL 31'(-M '1661( f~P;7.-(f ,Ullg GRANTAGREEMENTBETWEENCRAANDOWNER FOR SWEAT EQUITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR BAYSHORE/GA TEWA Y TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA 16Gb. . THIS AGREEMENT ENTERED this 2.bth day of ~hYIAfJ ~ ' 2.Q)~ by and between the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency (h remafter referred to as "CRA") and ~ <c~e\ ~ V-..c.t\C'( (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"). V~-U' Srel WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS, in Collier County Ordinance No. 2002-38, the Board of County Commissioners delegated authority to the CRA to award and administer CRA grants including contracts with owners for CRA grants; and WHEREAS, CRA Resolution No. 07-55 established the Sweat Equity Improvement Grant; and ~ -:UJ WHEREAS, Owner has applied for a Sweat Equity Grant m the amount of n"J .'l.r; dollars' and , WHEREAS, the CRA has determined that Owner meets the eligibility requirements and was approved for a grant award in the amount of U ~:,. 2-S' dollars on ftbr~ 7-(P , 2/)Og ("CRA Approval"), which is 100% of the costs to construct the impro ments. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: I. Owner acknowledges to the CRA that Owner has received a copy of the Collier County Community Sweat Equity Improvement Grant Program (hereinafter referred to as "Grant Program"), that Owner has read the Grant Program, and that Owner has had ample opportunity to discuss the Grant Program with Owner's counselor advisor. Owner further acknowledges to the CRA that Owner understands and agrees to abide by all of the terms and conditions of the Grant Program. Owner agrees to the terms and conditions of the Grant Program. 2. Owner is the record owner of property described as V;OO Lf~ sr, NAl'lE K. Yf-l \ "2- 3. Owner has agreed to make certain improvements to the property pursuant to the grant application submitted to the CRA dated 11-' lit 161- attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. 4. Owner agrees to complete the construction of the Sweat Equity Improvements within ninety (90) days of CRA Approval. Owner also agrees to provide the seat equity (labor) to complete the improvements. Sweat Equity Grant Agreement FY2008 2008 GRANT AGREEMENT 16G4 5. CRA has approved a grant to Owner in the amount of ~:, . -u; to be administered pursuant to the terms of this Agreement based on an estimated cost of \\ ~~ . --;,x; . If the actual cost of materials are less than the estimated costs to construct the improvements. the grant amount shall be reduced dollar for dollar in CRA funds; however in no case will the cost of materials for improvements be less than $500. 6. Unless prior disclosure is included in the grant application. no Owner, or any immediate relative of Owner, shall serve as a contractor or subcontractor for the construction of the improvements and no Owner, or any immediate relative of Owner, shall receive compensation for labor for the construction of the improvements. An immediate relative of Owner shall include mother, father, brother, sister, aunt, uncle and cousin or family member by marriage to include mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law and sister-in-law. 7. Owner agrees that all improvements completed do not require a Collier County permit or permit from any other agency. Upon completion of the work, Owner shall submit to the CRA staff a project summary report, two (2) 8 x 10 after photos, a list of materials and construction techniques used, and any other information specific to the project or requested by the CRA staff, The CRA, through its staff, shall confirm that the improvements were constructed pursuant to the terms of the application approved by the CRA. 8. Within forty-five (45) days after confirmation that the improvements were constructed pursuant to the terms of the approved application, Owner shall be issued a check in the amount of the grant. However, if Owner fails to make the improvements pursuant to the terms of the approved application, or if the project is not completed within ninety (90) days of CRA approval, or if Owner fails to make improvements of at least $500 value, the grant shall be deemed revoked and Owner shall be entitled to no funding. 9. of Florida. This Agreement shall be governed and construed pursuant to the laws of the State 10. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and their representatives and agents, and incorporates all prior understandings, whether oral or written. No change, modification or amendment, or any representation, promise or condition, or any waiver, to this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized officer of the party to be charged. 11. This Agreement is personal to Owner, and may not be assigned or transferred by Owner or to Owner's respective heirs, personal representatives, successors or assigns without the prior written consent of the CRA. Sweat Equity Grant Agreement FY2008 ') 2008 GRANT AGREEMENT 1664 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first written above. , o:~~u- OA~ ref he ((^-- Printe yped Name Mlcl-/I91L l(l9-;1/ O~.:s'{i;;'L Printed/Typed Name E By ~__ ~JJtf! I/€-l/~ VQ(1c1l!f~+ej Printed/T ed Name Witness Signature 5/fLJtJfr illI/5L'/J PrintedlTyped ame r ATTEST: DWI9'ffii'~~I~~OCK, Clerk ','~:~k ~ . .'.;: ;peputyClerk ~t"$t "l!...C.~t1"lllll1 S(9li.t.......t.'. . I ,j f; . ,,-. ~ . \', :.c . COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY d By: A FIALA, Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: {).f.. -;Jt0ti~ MlIIjorie . Student-Sti ling Assistant County Attorney Sweat Equity Grant Agreement FY2008 , .1 1664 BAYSHORE GATEW Y TRINGLE ~ L._...,J ~ / -, E33E33l:J COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPLICATION I, ,-, ,.." 'I In r-~- ,7 ,,--. ,-, '\ j" 'I ,.., I , : OC) Michael and Kelly VanderStel 2500 Lee Street Naples, Florida 34112 2008 GRANf APPLICATION 0 1664 SWEAT EQUITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION Section 1: Applicant Information Owner Name: >{ A//(/TtlFt W"9.V/}P/~ c<'7g( Owner Address: v f) <DC) L../--:-F-' Site Address (if different from owner address): )r;?J 0 L-tb Srrz.a-, rJ rll..'l6 ';J;41 { ?- ~ k~( VA1"Q{1t.Srec:. Legal Description of Site: ,2.S r r-: (E E Daytime Phone: fl..2cr /'---2D T -- C, s 41- Alternate Phone: E-Mail Address: M//cEV/\//lPt.A<; @ Aci ' r"D/I/( How long have you owned this property? ,'S l/ ic7:;.A c , Number of Years in Business at Site Address: Occupational License Number: First Time Shereline Impruvement Grant Applicant? y., ~ r ( ! i ( Yes~ NoD NoD If no, how many applications submitted? Grant(s) awarded? Yes D Sweat Equity Improvement Grant FY2008 4 Details Page 1 of I 'J:C:E'miI. : " , 16G4 Pr"nerty ~ecord A-erial Sketct-:es €I Folio No.1 7641 0040008 Current Ownership I Pn>perty Addressl2500 LEE ST €I OWner Nam Add_ C VANDERSTEL, MICHAEL=& KELLEY 2500 LEE ST NAPLES Stale FL Zip 34112 - 4728 Legall T AMIAMI HGTS LOTS 1 SectIon 11 Township 50 Ra e 25 Acres 0.16 Map No. 5A11 Sllap No. 655300 15A11 Sub No. ~ use.Cod!! 655300 1 TAMIAMI HEIGHTS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL A...rg ~ Mm.1I!! 11.486 2007 Final Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Latest Sales History E-;:;E \hli"coi, shG\'m i~ciJ-\\' cq:mi~i p<1(cd vws sreats!c 2;t0r tiE; Fin:,l T,,:~ r:oi, Date dOOi, - ;~':;';0"- Amount 05 f 2004 3561 - 468 $195,000.00 02 f 2003 3227.-2793 $ 105,000.00 08 f 2002 3091-1919 $ 72,000.00 06 I 2002 3062 - 2415 $ 60,000.00 06 f 2002 3062 - 2414 $ 0.00 06 I 2002 3062 - 2413 $ 0.00 08 / 2000 2712- 1680 $ 0.00 01/1993 1786 - 2242 $ 0.00 Land Value $ 83,754.00 (+ 1m roved Value $ 172,249.00 (=) Markel Value $ 256,003.00 H SOH Exempt Value $ 91,028.00 {= Assessed Value $ 164,975.00 (-) Homestead and other Exempt Value $ 25,000.00 (=) Taxable Value $139,975.00 SOH '" "Save Our Homes" exempt value due to cap on assessment increases. 'J:C:E'miI The Information is Updated Weekly. http://www.colJierappraiser.com/RecordDetail.asp?Map=&FoliolD=000007641 0040008 1/14/Z008 P~e 1 of,1 J.6LLL , ~<l) ,~ '" CO;;"1\" P~.::;::>"t; ,',. http://maps.collierappraiser .com/output/Collier 2007 sdeOZ65887 4604800, jpg 1/1412008 2008 GRANT APPLICA nON 1 6 G 4 . Landscaping installation, and improvement at front of building (visible from public street), and must include in-ground irrigation system . All work must be completed within 90 days of approval by CRA Grant funds may not be used for: . Working capital or administrative costs (payroll, rent, utilities, etc.) . Sweat equity (time/labor of applicant or family) . New construction . Residential additions/expansions of existing buildings or on site . Residential rental property - apartments or buildings with more than two units . Interior renovations . Seawalls or waterfront improvemenls . Demolition only . Loans or other capital support . Work that will extend beyond ninety (90) days of approval by CRA . Work completed prior to approval of Sweat Equity Improvement Grant Project Evaluation All projecls will be evaluated based upon the following: . Number and extent of improvemenls (minimum 2 for residential) . Ability to begin work immediately and ability to complete project within 90 days . Remedy of code enforcement violations Or Points Available I 1 1 1 1 I I 3 I Points Awarded Project Provides Ie 1 2 3 1 1 Subtotal ~~- Sweat Equity Improvement Grant FY2008 (revised 119nOOS) 2 2008 GRANT APPLICATION / / vt6 G 4. Section 2: Project Information Existing Condition of Project (attach additional sheets if necessary): A'/CJ ElX~.../N G.- ... c., Pq.~ ~ p~C C " / .51:>1< I/Jc./5 ex. fiI2 VVDV{) y')C,', ~ fJ/2:~/ J/V<"y ,<:i{J/vrp lhC;i ..- Prl2Li/J,f' LJE.."ylJ 71:1&"1= ATfACH "BEFORE" PHOTOS AT LEAST TWO 8XlO COLOR PHOTOS, OTIIERS MAY BE ADDED TO ACCURATELY DESCRIBE THE SITE). Outline Proposed Improvements in Detail (attach additional sheets if necessary): J;;CK3- 4L1 L4MQ"fJPF tf-4/J[) PDc:t PEPL/k'P SFfJ 11/('';:' f)f)(JiD (?'../j)j/V'p (JOY' C;- (/ /VIP 4-D f) JJ FVr/ 7J)~. '1=::- List Materials to be Used and Construction Methods to be Utilized (i.e. type paint, plant species, irrigation ~tem' dOOrslwt/?w.si etc.) (Attac~ addition:" sheets ifn~: J. J:;tJCo.//1/ (.;,. .2 1)f) (71)LJ.:: .s PI I,-.. L j!) /\)&12 . 1);::-:g J5 L~ PA-UYI T:l2EE- Sweat Equity Improvement Grant FY2008 5 ~., 16Sl , Iv Wlttr 61B'1 rJ t( ~/ D~V8 /:LhcJL.S ~ ~ '<. ""..! .'"L '~:~;~,;" .. .T,J. ~, '~ '~~^" .( '~?(., , .t.~;,~;j' '. ~ ~;:..lk'r .. ' . ~.... ,. \-~~~" , ..." ~ : ,~...- ";';'4 .,.:' , "r!' /i t~ "~ c- ~) 4 PfUJi21\1TVG /CoClLS - tiDGl (J0 Gj " '''" , ;,""W: iI -",. . I , '. I Or{. '. "j". f , '. i' . % " , . " .; ", it": .. ... AJ, \. t', . ... ..'v " ~'\ "., .'",: . " \. ." '\" 'w, ~/~ ";,.. ., ., . " . "" ",'<b .. q- I __nnn 1.0' 0')' 0: <.0: .....' I ' 00: 'O::t: M' <.0: , . , 0' Z: , , , , 0' , ~ , ,,' 0>, "" a. c ID o ~ ol ro o MOl 0_ g::o<C ,0'" MooO ol-CO r- -, _~o ol~ ('I') C .. N " C _U ~ .. ~ ~ .. b CO Q) Q) CO 0. $: c ..... U) Q) o c CO -- ..c 0 - > a..U~~ w Wt') ~z <(:J z--' Iii> f-f- ::la: 00 wa. WooIX: 1-'" - OM <( cow => ~...... 00 ID ~(Q w~ en W --' a. 0<( a:z ~ w I- o ::> " .... .... '" "? .... ~ C> E N ~ . E o I en CO> !::! .... ... < :c c.:I ::iE N ~ ... M --' U. f- W W f- W ....W ...W .....--' (1)0 !:CO ...ID ClN 25 <n 'I E .~ <II ~ --- ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 . o E ~ ~ <3 ~ a: o o o t') z u a: a. w W --' a. --' <( u. Z , , , , , , , , , ....' Q' Q' .....' -, CC , ~, - , - , .. , =' ... , .s:::, en.....' c::!-=t NO- J :;=1 ~>, ..:. U,I t "":'" CD I .... .. , g"': I ",a..' " a: W :J --' o u > " il L> N ~ ~ ... M o N '0 '" " ;; ;; lij- ::> - C- ". '" ~~ ~" 'E~ -=t) 0::> ~o ~O or <=:Q ,,0 '" ~" "'" ?'O ;;;c: "," "" -0 ,,;;; E > 0: <( :2: :2: :::> en w (.).. - .. >= 0:>= W-;:.: CJ)~ C ii: Z ii <c i w" en;Z - .. C'" z~ <(i! J:'" US 0:>= W=: :2:~ -' l- (/) o IX: U. t'l Z :) I U IX: <( a: I- U I -' o 00 X <0 M .... =I:l: a.. :::l ::.=: o ii: a: w :2 o I- C/) :::l o C/) W o :> a: w C/) ~ W C/) Q z <( :t: o a: w :2 ..J ..J <( LL o C/) w t:' a: oCt :t: o ..J <( I- o I- o ". ". q M M ;; ~ .....: to <D N -<I> 0 0 '" M M '" '" ~ .... co: => l:i .. I- .... ... '" co: ~ co: ... ~ ~ I~ <t to ol o CO ~ to ~ CO 16G4 ~, g ,f",r,J, \;::;J. .q LO 0) o c.o ..... I to .q (Y) c.o o Z ~ ~ \~ ~ 'V ~\ &~ ::,~A) v;<--' ?:jA - o " 0> '" a. 00 r---- , ----- I.C) , --- en: 0' CD: .....' , I , 00' o:::t: (Y)' CD: , . , 0' z: , ~, , , 0' , ~, ,,' 0>, "" "- c I , \ ~ '" o ~ ol cD o ",ol 0_ ~ocn ,00:: "'<Xl'" Ol-I- r-......J _Qien 0> c .. '" " c ~u ~ .. h ~ .. 0 Q:l <D Q:l CO a. ~ c...... (I) Q) o C IV .- J:: 0 - > ,,-u"''' en 0:: L I en wl9 ttZ <(:J z-' ::J I"- 1-1- ::Jo:: 00 en 0.. W<XlO:: I-<t- "'<( 0'" en => ~..... ..... 0 '" \J - '" en~ en w -' "- 0<( o::z ~ , , , , , , , , I ,..., =' Q' .....' -I ... , .- , ;=, .- , ..I "" "-, -= 1 ...1-1 "5I:"CI1 N=I - ClI 1 ~>I ~ fn I ~ c>> I ... CO 1 g"i: I _________NCI.. t <:t -- <:t "" CD ,.:. . C> g N ~ 6i E ... ~ ~ w I- o ;:) o w I- o ::J o '" ~ .2 a: c Z a. w &. ~ g :3 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ u .s.: u > . o o U .... .... CC :c ~ :!! '" ~ ~ <t '" '" ~ " ~ <t '" -' L1. I- w w I- en ....w ....w 1--' (1)0 cz:0 ....'" C1'" 2; CC~ ~ en w -' 0.. -' <( L1. Z o '" " ;:; ;:; c _' '" :0 0- ". '" -:;; "E Eo -- '" 0:0 -u -0 Ct" ;:;E ,,0 .c'" -" "'" ~ "c ",,,, ~ ,,:;; E > a: c::( ~ ~ ::> en W (J. S;U a:~ W'" cn-! ;;: o ~ z " <( ii U W en:: - .. 0:2 Zit: c::(Sil Zen (J:g a:i; W.... :iE~ .... :tl:: a.. :;:) :.:: o i5: a: w ~ e l- (/) ::> o I - u <( w a. -' (f) -' :J <( 10 ~ (f) 0 I- w Z ::J ffi ~ a. m '" en w 0:: w a. <( a5a:~ :::> W (f) o ~ CD o 0:: _ u.::;: - u-' ~ In <{ .a. Z ;;: 0'" og . N ~= ~ - - ... !C .. OM'" 00 <t :::> o l , ~ OOO>U <D;~i: .. ... ~ :::> .. ... ::c U en uu > a: w (/) ell w CI) S z <( :z:: o a: w ~ ...I ...I <( U. e CI) w C') a: <( :z:: o ...I <( l- e I- co IS) m o '" ~ cD <t ..., '" o Z 0:: w Cl 0:: o L1. o Cl Z w --...-/)., .... ~" \ -/',. '? ~~ 7--: \// , 1664 'I"'" .> \~"''''''''. \-/-/<. \":?r"), !,.~/;~,j:) 71i> " 00 It) en o <.0 .- , 00 'd" M <.0 o Z - o " 0> '" "- ,; l ~ o - ~ 2 B ;~ ! i! ~ ~l . c; ..':!: l3 ~ III ~ ii (I) ~ III ! ;:.; ?g' 'U ~-; l~ i ~~.~ ~2 ~].: 2 ~ s~ ~ ~:Oil -1l1C'.c: .8 ..: ~ B "'.!.~ >.;: fi i1 f} ~ Q. ~~.Eii~ &:E.!2~ .. O~~"'i5 3 .!!! 8 lIl.g C j t!:J:fi..! 011 ~ ~o; ~ ! ~ioc~: : .;;; i1;; ~ ~~g:f~~; j_2~.g-<<i.~~ ;~ai~'& ..10_"0. E~2-=gl!: 8_ ;-"11 =;=j.!!~~g is J 2: 8 II> ::J__ i~:i!~g .ail"';;C:': ... ~.~ 8.2.g !~&;..iil :~J:o~o__ ZChtil:a:Q:Q: ~ o o N N N ~ ...I <( I- Z w a: ...I o o I- I- m ::; w () - a: ~ [i[EKii ~~~f*.~~ cncnOHftOllllD 0000_00 ....,. . Ii E E E Ii E E ~~it~i~ CD CCHCHIHD ... 0000000 ~ !!l!!;:di!i """'~l-....CoO. I I (f) ~~ Q.- <(.... z"" ::> ~ ::co. N c f-f- 0 ::>0:: '-M_ 00 VO II: (f)a. MN 0 ex) a:: ...IN i o::t::;: l.L.ri g M..... 00)_ CO(f) ffil'-: ~w ~mi B(Oo<(("). cn....a:z!::!cn ~ ! ) 888888888888 g-iaioo-iciai<ciociN l")~~::~~~~N~:;;~ 888888888888 ciaiu:iciocOO<DN<'>it'li-i ~~~~~~~~,...::~:! 8888888g8888 O..,j-iciONO-iuiaiaciai MMl")Mf')MMrl~"'''''M 888888888888 ~(')..t":":M":-ipjci":ci NNNNNNN('f....MMM _OWr--"'O.-<ONON"" O.............NNNl")fOCOcn 1t)1D...IDIOW......lOonlQlt) " .; ~~ ~~ u m:x: e ~: ~ l~ i ~ 8 ~ j-;;; ;; <:~ -i ~~ ~~~~~~jj; ~'E8i5'S":!~5>:ti~'ii ~~lD~~3;~~la~~ ~.!!'ia;a;'i~~!~ .0 a.:fr:::'iii'iz...g1i~=o E;; g'r::: c; a OJ G 'i l- c:l g' o .....-1ii1ii~... > J::'S!:2.~ u~~:e:sgg~~:9:2~ ;;(u..u..u..u..a:u-,oa::a;u.. ~ N ., ~ 8888888 SO..t.oNr.iN P)NV__...._ M__lI)OlOlGl 8 ~~~ ~~~~ :i Nom NVV.... ::vv ""000 N NMf"lM ~ ~!l~ ~!l!l!l ;; maN lI)COOOCO N__ co,..,....r-. 8 ~!l~ ~~!l~ ..; o~., GOVf"lf"l ~ N vKlIOUl ., m m., dlMNv g 000 NM..,v ~~~ r-.r-.r-.r-. ~ ~ ~ oo I~l~ .g ~Saa ii !!l-cnll.l @ .e 8.5.~ ...... GlID..Q. E~lii.~i~~:!i Gl a. :l c. g u 2'~ r::: ii: J:::::i: 8..x C i' ~ 01:2 .~6~l-lijij ~1t:~~~! S:~rt;t;i=i= ! ~ u ! "- > /; !! D 5 888888888888888888888888888 ~~~~g~~~:gg::~~:3~~~~~:~~~: MlI)N_f"lV""COr-.COV_NOlIO__~lI)VCCJNNNMV"" 888888888888888888888888888 ti~~~g~g~~gg:~g~~;~::::~~ti~~ _N __NNNN_ M_ VN__ ___ 888888888888888888888888888 ~N~~ci~o~r.icior.i~~..tNN..tr.i~NN..t~~~~ ....Ul-_f"lf"lll)UlCOIOV_Nr-.v__~r-.MVNN_....~CO ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~181~1~~~~~~!l :M~~~~~~3~~m~:~ ~~~ g~~~~:~ -O_NMOvco~~ovm....covcor-._N""lI)ON_NM 8ooooSggoo88~~~~~~~~22~~ggg ~ oo . . i ~~ iii .. 1 ~~ ~~~m o_-.u_u_ ~ "I ... =_ J!~ ; ...~~~~ ~m~ i~ ~~ ~~~~~511 ~;-i "~:~ &o.~~] e.. e ~!:!:!- co _" E!'C) E QI ;: .2'-1; &. i. &. ~ -=....~ ~8~u~-- i~.i ~J:EN.~~8ffia!.333 E 'e (/)=(/)l!~=:l(/H' .B:a-'~::l!:~ ...... ;:~"',~~~~~~lo~~~~ ~~co.!:!;":l:l :> lSlS15 Ci ti Gl<;:Jol:)oo;(/) ~ ~~.:>],:g.:g,],],E E E 8gij~.g__.-~~ ~ ~~.... uluum~Ul-~~~~~~~~~OOO Q m_ e! .i.g_ MS~'ii:j:a _u_:l:lWC) i"oi~:-;- iiicz~-:~~~ "2J:~~~3~Q: 15:ldaa~!lii 'i..J:!J:!'iiaJ: oi=I=t=i=o6.f 88888888888888 :~~ggg~g:~~:lIJ8:i VlnlDCO..-lIJCOr-.lIJlD....... .... 88888888888888 ~;i~ggg~g::~~~~ __N...._NNNN...._ M 88888888888888 ~:~:2g:2:2:g~~~:!;i~ 88888888888888 "'=f'i":oi~oici.o":f'i..tcioiGi NMM..........,.....VIDMN...ID ...MIDr-.OlN....ONNmo..o OOOOO_~NNMMv""lD lIJCOCOll) COli) lIJa)lIJCOll) co COli) " <2 'lii~j~ __ oe III 0_ _=:l'liiMl- ~5~.~ :!2~~" .~~i7,:..jgiii~~ ~ .j.:'S!i~oi::!::l!:t:~t..i ~-:'~.::!:o::::~6;:2'~.a .........C.....Gl.:;;Ol.- li 1_$.!!J:fitQ(Jl:.~5~.!' 1=i=i=;::~~~~..itOld:(I)~ 8888888888 g~~~~~~~:8 _Mr-.lQfDCOfDCO....M 8888888888 g~i~g~~~~g _N_NNNN _ 8888888888 uia:icr:i":..t..t..t~~ _NCO""IDIQIOID...N 8888888888 ":ci"':"':oa:ia:ia:ioiai ....NVMMMMf"l ... 8~gg~8~:!~~ __NNNNNNMM ~ a g . u.~11 ~~ je~Il2 al ~!.3"~~ _ ji_~i!S~:g5 ~c%.gi!I~::~.? ON~:J:ClxlliEw.~ ~i::!@.~~.~ ~ E;-~ ;;;J:g~~2:i!~~ :Q>O:lE..!iSS-" ~~m~~13i&5~ 16 ~.. 8888888888 888 g~~~~~g~:8~~~g~ Nf"l....VMVMM_..._Mf"lCl 88888888888888 oc..t..t~.oci<'ici.o.o..tciw lIJ;:::!~~~C:O;::IOUJlJ)e~;:;; 88888888888888 ciGi.o":":..toa:i..t..t..two..t NNM....MMNN__...NMW'> be "" 88gggggggggggg ";":cioil'i..t..tcicicicioi":a:i .-NMNNN_N_...__Mf"l " ~ ~ N_l"IlDCOCOONcoc:omOM.... ooooOO.........__NNN mmmmmcnOl<nOlmmOlOl 1\ I . lii U E ~ ~ - ;" ~ 11 - C) _ .. ....i: to >g~. . iiE~ 'q . 2' a2~ .!'.. @ ~x 0<1; ti IIJ ~. a; ~ II) .. ....., g. . c::: -:.... ~ -. lii .... Gl...... l::'!....liiEi:~~~ J:s:oo "'~"2"2a'-a;o.!:!....~Sl_.. ....u.. ",~~=Q.l.o:(/)l.o:lD.!!!:= :g&~~~...&&&&&&;~ f~~~~~~3~~~~]5 ':><- ~ ~ W) :::r- ~ -;-.. -<> 'C) t-0 \\-- 888 ~=g ..~~ 8888888888 ~:gg~~:iggg IPCONMCO..,.r-.NN.... 888 cicio _w", NNN 8888888888 :~g28g~ggg _N _N_N ... 888 -i";~ ..m.. 8888888888 ~:ggg~~;ig~g ~~~ moo", ~~~ 8888888888 ~;:!~:;;~~:!:!re Noom ~g:;: -on.....,.OVlDCOCOV ~~~S':;:;::t;;~ i tii tii ~~;< U~ ~oo'" . - - o 0 ;: 11 ; U! .!i.!i.!i Q'i :g?E;P .. liS . _ u j@~;:n ~ !!:!. .:;;; Go !:!~~ii :! ;X:!:EE o8io8~iLrQ. Ill) ... N , Q..!! 1;; E 0. ......~E..e..ICa~E ~~~=&~~ 6.l ~~~,,~hid ....c....~_1iOll... 3:33.~;.~118~ J;J;<ZO('lNN3:a:N 2008 GRANT APPLICATION 16G4 PROJECT INITIATION AND COMPLETION FORM (to be submitted with Site Improvement Grant Application) I, fYl;?h~{ 'vtMtd(r {j--c..,,( , owner/tenant of the property located at ~S()CJ Lp.-t- ~T. "llt.p, ~ <; , have the funding and capability necessary to begin the site improvements listed under Section 2 of the completed Sweat Equity Improvement Grant application and have the ability to complete all improvements within ninety (90) days of the approval of the improvement grant by the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency. Signature of Tenant (ifleased) Date Signature of Tenant (ifleased) (if jointly leased) ~e ~%AU Signature of Owner Date ~-q>6~ Date Signature of Owner (if jointly owned) Date Sweat Equity Improvement Grant FY2008 (revised 11912008) 8 2008 GRANT APPLICATION 16G4 Section 3: Project Cost Information Estimated Project Cost: . ALL WORK TO BE COMPLETED BY OWNER, FAMILY OR FRIENDS . APPLICATION MUST HA VB AT LEAST WRITIEN ESTIMATES OR QUOTES FOR MATERIALS ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION Estimated Requested from CRA $_ 7-13. 4 ~. ):;,'f Project materials must be a minimum of $500 and a maximnm of $1,000 COPIES OF ALL RECEIPTS AND/OR CANCELED CHECKS WILL BE REQUIRED UPON PROJECf COMPLEfION AS PROOF TIlAT ALL MATERIALS FOR IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN PAID. NO REIMBURSEMENT WILL BE MADE BY THE CRA UNTIL ALL RECEIPTS AND/OR CANCELED CHECKS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED AND VERIFIED. Section 4: Availability of Grant Funds This grant program will be available for limited periods of the calendar year. . Winter Program - October 1 st through December 30th . Summer Program - May 1 st through July 31 st Jil1!u7- ate ) d.-l 4--07 , Date .. r s..' [~~o/t>r Sweat Equity Improvement Grant FY2008 6 MEMORANDUM Date: February 27, 2008 To: David L. Jackson Executive Director/CRA 2408 Lindwood Ave, Suite 7 Unit 11 Naples, Florida 34112 From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Agenda Item #16G5: Site Improvement Grant Agreement Attached, for your records, please find one certified copy as referenced above (Agenda Item #16G5) approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. The Minutes & Records Department has retained an original document for the record. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 774-8411. Thank you, Attachments 1665 OR-leI ",A.L'f 6 f' ::\. IC"M 1(,6 rjl q 5 rL~ llt>,l{)O'i{ ~~ ~ . ,-" SITE IMPROVEMENT GRANT AGREEMENT . .",< 'I' :1' ,.' after '-;r1: (':l;::'i::,I:C,F'.T; ;'; :;;-,';ir-:'('T' 4. THE SITE IMPROVEMENT GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CRA AND OWNER This agreement is to be signed and witnessed AFTER eRA staff have found the Application to be complete. THIS AGREEMENT ENTERED this 26 day of February. 2008 by and between the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency (hereinafter referred to as "CRA") and Patrick Phelps (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"). WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS, in Collier County Ordinance No. 200Z-38, the Board of County Commissioners delegated authority to the CRA to award and administer CRA grants including contracts with owners for CRA grants; and WHEREAS, Owner has applied for a site improvement grant in the amount of 2.586.54 dollars; and WHEREAS, the CRA has determined that Owner meets the eligibility requirements and was approved for a grant award in the amount of 2.586.54 dollars on February 26. 2008, ("CRA Approval"), which is 33% of the costs to construct the site improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: I. Owner acknowledges to the CRA that Owner has received a copy of the Collier County Community Site Improvement Grant Program (hereinafter referred to as "Grant Program"), that Owner has read the Grant Program, and that Owner has had ample opportunity to discuss the Grant Program with Owner's counselor advisor. Owner further acknowledges to the CRA that Owner understands and agrees to abide by all of the terms and conditions of the Grant Program. Owner agrees to the terms and conditions of the Grant Program. 2. Owner is the record owner of property described as 3043 CottaJl.e Grove Avenue. Naples. Florida 341 12. 3. Owner has agreed to make certain improvements to the property pursuant to the grant application submitted to the CRA dated January I I. 2008 attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. 4. Owner agrees to complete the construction of the Site Improvements within one (I) year ofCRA Approval. Owner also agrees to fund at least 33% of the costs of the Site Improvements. Owner is prohibited from paying contractors and/or vendors with cash; all payments for S!:L' ;mnfO.ff;'Hij'}'li Gf';)(17 ~, f ,,;,~, '1 f.: I~ ! ""'" u SITE IMPROVEMENT GRANT AGREEMENT ,., ;"{:'! <:,.,: '.: ;~._' " H.i' "'if' <~;;; ,: after i-;- :\ _',l.)~:f ':,n.:: .,-if')!;'-,-1:1' "~If r; approved projects must be in the form of a personal check, cashier's check, money order or credit card. 5. CRA has approved a grant to Owner in the amount of$2.586.54 to be administered pursuant to the terms of this Agreement based on an estimated cost of $7,838.00. If the actual costs are less than the estimated costs to construct the Site Improvements and less than $8,000, the grant amount shall be reduced dollar for dollar in matching CRA funds as determined by ratio of matching private funds required. 6. Unless prior disclosure is included in the grant application, no Owner, or any immediate relative of Owner, shall serve as a contractor or subcontractor for the construction of the Site Improvements and no Owner, or any immediate relative of Owner, shall receive compensation for labor for the construction of the Site Improvements. An immediate relative of Owner shall include mother, father, brother, sister, aunt, uncle and cousin or family member by marriage to include mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law and sister-in-law. Owner has verified that all contractors who have provided bids for the approved work are actively licensed by Collier County and owner agrees that all labor will be performed only by the lowest bidding contractor. 7. Owner agrees to obtain all necessary permits and submit any required plans to the County's Community Development and Environmental Services Division. Upon completion of the work, Owner shall submit to the CRA staff a project summary report, two (2) 8 x 10 after photos, a list of materials and construction techniques used, a list of architects and/or contractors, and any other information specific to the project or requested by the CRA staff. The CRA, through its staff, shall confirm that the Site Improvements were constructed pursuant to the terms of the application approved by the CRA. 8. Within forty-five (45) days after confirmation that the Site Improvements were constructed pursuant to the terms of the approved application, Owner shall be issued a check in the amount of the grant. However, if Owner fails to make the improvements pursuant to the terms of the approved application, or if the project is not completed within one (1) year of CRA approval, or if Owner fails to fund at least 33% of the cost of the Site Improvements, the grant shall be deemed revoked and Owner shall be entitled to no funding. 9. of Florida. This Agreement shall be governed and construed pursuant to the laws of the State 10. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and their representatives and agents, and incorporates all prior understandings, whether oral or written. No change, modification or amendment, or any representation, promise or condition, or any waiver, to this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized officer of the party to be charged. Site Improvement Grant .- I~gre€me\)t 2 1665 .... ~ SITE IMPROVEMENT GRANT AGREEMENT <' jf" :;-:,i: 'l is 'C' ~,I:i I ,i'1rj "l.W" ;llter -,~:3ft f'ol:: :j:_~)il!!:,n<H'! ,.C :i'i'lp,,~h ] ]. This Agreement is personal to Owner, and may not be assigned or transferred by Owner or to Owner's respective heirs, personal representatives, successors or assigns without the prior written consent of the CRA. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first written above. OIJf'ci/J By: ~' (2) Witness Sign ::~ (iT '!-J!A- b 12-0N F Printed/Typed Name By: PrintedITyped Name ATTEST:' " "'(; . DW19A.-fE~9CK, Clerk ", n .'. "YL_ r-J.' C ,". ...,~~~tL- ~t uto*';'Cferk 51~<,."'~' , ':~' ..\.. COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY By: <U ~ DO' A 'ffA"tA, Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Site Impro'/enHmt Gran~ !\grDement 3 16 F; o i BAYSHORE GATEW Y TRIA"NGLE .~ ,.r,<,~,:,-,g:::<"..... ' /. ',:\<tYi.i;~';,)J;'>,:-,:'" I33I33EJ COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPLICATION I, ~ -:;' .'-~ ~',l~-' ir~i ~"-,-'~, I~\ r-\,r r-T' 03 I 2008 Patrick Phelps 3043 Cottage Grove Avenue Naples, Florida 34112 .s, .' )S..' '-,';:Lc-<tl_; l"'-::~' 16G~ J APPLICATION FORM 1. THE SITE IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION 1-1 Applicant Information 1. Owner Name: Patrick Phelps 2. Owner Address: 2954 Cottage Grove Avenue Naples, FL 34112 3. Site Address (if different from owner address): 3043 Cottage Grove Avenue Naples, FL 34112 4. Folio Number and Legal Description of Site: 23370520006. Bayview Park Lot 17 OR 1995 5. Daytime Phone with area code: 2397755068 6. Alternate Phone with area code: 239 775 5048 7. E-mail Address:pphelps@isp.com 8. If you own this property, how long have you owned it? 2+ years REQUIRED ATIACHEMENTS TO THIS PAGE FOR ALL APPLICANTS: I. Property Appraiser's Identification Record.' 2. Aerial photograph of all parcels included in the grant. . · These can be obtained from the Property Appraiser's website at hltlJ://www.collieralJlJraise...eom/. 9. If you lease this property, how long is lease term? (attach copy oflease) 10. Is this your first time to apply for a Site Improvement Grant? Yes G No D 11. If you have been awarded a Site Improvement Grant in the past, please list the date(s) and award amounts for each grant you have received. Attach a separate page if necessary. (OIllIlHTl'lal \pplil'.lllh 1I1lh pILI"{' ,In..." i. I Illllh IJ-IS 12, Tenant Name (Commercial Only): 13. Tenant Daytime Phone: 14. Tenant Alternate Phone: 15. Number of Years in Business at Site Address: 16. Occupational License Number: 17. Other Tenant Names, if any: -; UetaIls Page 1 of1 16G5 Property Record I: Aerial .~~ Sketches , I ~ FoOo No.1 23370520006 Current Ownership I Property AddressU 3043 COTTAGE GROVE AVE ~ Owner N Addresses PHELPS, PATRICK 2954 COTTAGE GROVE AVE NAPLES _ FL Zip 34112 -7312 Legall BA YVIEW PARK LOT 17 OR 1995 PG 805 Section Townsh A""", Map No. Strap No. 23 50 25 0.16 5A23 182200 175A23 Sub No. 182200 BAYVIEW PARK ...~ Use Code 1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 2007 Final Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Latest Sales History If all Values shown below equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Land Value $ 92,150.00 DaI8 Book. Page Amount (+)Im Value $ 49,159.00 1112005 3930 -1680 $ 0.00 (=) Market Value $ 141,309.00 1011994 1995 -.B05 $ 40,000.00 H SOH Exempt Value $0.00 0311994 1927- 374 $ 25,500.00 (=) Assessed Value $ 141,309.00 (-) Homestead and other Exempt Value $0.00 (=) Taxable Value $ 141,309.00 SOH = -Save Our Homes. exempt value due to cap on assessment inCI ~as8S. m!I!II The Information is Updated Weekly. http://www.collierappraiser.comIRecordDetai1.asp?Map=&FolioID=OOOOO23370520006 1/7/2008 Print Map Page 1 of1 1..6.G5 <<> 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Properly Appraiser is commiUed to providing the most accurate and up-tcH:Sate infonnation, nc for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. http://maps.collierappraiser.comlwebmap/mapprint.aspx?title=&orient=LANDSCAPE&pap... 2/6/2008 ..~ "~~~~'-~:'~ 16G5 APPLICATION FORM 1-2 Project Information I. Please describe the existing condition of each project for which you would like funding from a Site Improvement Grant (attach additional sheets if necessary). Attllch two "Before" photos (8X10 color) to this page for each improvement you want to IfUJke. Shingles are missing. Roof is 20+ years old. 2. Outline proposed improvements in detaiL Include one of the following for each project: A) itemized work estimates from actively licensed contractors for work to be done by contractors or B) material descriptions for work you intend to do yourself on supplier letterhead. Replace shingles. Put on gauge metal roof. Install new gutters and down pipes. 3. List Materials to be used and construction methods to be utilized (i.e. red bricks will be installed with traditional masonry methods, awnings will be hung, etc.) (attach additional sheets if necessary). A1tIlch drawings or sketch of improvements to this page. Attllch color samples for each improvement to this page. Shingles. 26 gauge galvalume metal for roof. Wood for service door. REQUIRED ATfACHEMENTS TO THIS PAGE FOR ALL APPLICANTS: I. Two blO color photos of eacb project for the Site Improvement Grant. 2. Ifwork is beinl! done by contractors. TWO ESTIMATES from ACTIVELY LICENSED CONTRACTORS WITH COLLIER COUNTY must be included for each job. Additionally, you must provide license information for eacb contractor (information available at bUO:l/a00s2.collien!ov.net/webasms/visionlConCertldefault.asox call contractor to verifY the name under which the license is registered!). Ifwork is beinl! done bv vourself, provide two official rice otes for t funds do not cover a licant's labor . ..~ {C~:j~.k) 16G APPLICATION FORM 1-3 Project Points Directions: In the colwnn labeled "Work Included in Current Application", please indicate work to be done as proposed in this application with a check mark (,f). Po." Projects Work Im."" i. eRA OFFICE Cwnnt~ USE ONLY Roof repairs ./ /{' Removal of or repair 10 DOrches awninos ca'loDies, or cafJXlrts Installation of or reoairto hurricane shutters IMndow or door uDa'ade 10 hurricane standards Exterior woodNork reoair """aoement or ~ inslalation Stucco work or realacement sidinn New or realacement roofl1o. rain cn:tter sYStem and soffit work V S Paintino Slonn water chinage . ments Flfst-time aoolicant V Ol. 'r lctiwwav must showsions of damaae) Installation of or reoair to ctivewav wlverls Construction of or reolir to fencino I chainlink orohibiledl Removal of trees for health, safety and weI13re benefits Omproved residential Io1s onIv) Removal of exotic veaelalion (tor' residential lots onlvl Demolition of structures tor health, safety and welfare Other projects approved by the CRA 7<7' For office use ollly: Total number .of pQints for this applK;ation is 2.')... ~ J~lf-)JJ6t( / S' tIIre ofCM staff Date .~ -:J:.I - .:.s'.'.,.-:. ;"'~~l;::-f 16G5 APPLICATION FORM 1-4 Verification of Resources to Undertake Project ~~ ~~~ ' owner/tenant of the property located at o C A- " r1v E: , have the funding and capability necessary to begin the site improvements listed under Section l-Z (page 2 of application) of the completed site improvement grant application and have the ability to complete all improvements within one year of the approval of the site improvement grant by the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency. ercial only) !)-- ~ - ;?d:J~ Date Signature of Ownerffenant (Commercial only) (if jointly owned or leased) Date Signature of Ownerffenant (Commercial only) (if join or! Date Z--b --O~ Date --~ .~"...,,~ "~'\~\"-'f T........, ~" 16G5 APPLICATION FORM 1-5 Project Costs Estimated Project Cost: $ -:; ~5 ~, 0 2) , , ALL WORK TO BE COMPLETED BY A CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE AT LEAST TWO (2) WRI'ITEN ESTIMATES OR QUOTES ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION. Estimated amount requested from CRA $ ~ / <; g (p. s If I NOTE: Copies of all receipts and/or cancelled checks will reauired uoon proiect completion as proof that all materials and contracted improvements have been oaid. No reimbursement will be made bv the CRA until all receipts and/or cancelled checks have been received and verified. FOR CRA USE ONLy Total Estimated Project Cost: reg g ~,o '" Request from CRA: -;l.fr-'iJb. s'f 3Oo~ Percentage of Total: !.!::. :-I/-~J Date Owner Signature CRAS~C? Date J./cr/o :t Date ;) 16G5 1665 ~,~'li>'!i<& .::....;..:::.-tJ?-'R~ Sewiee. 1tte. 1755 J&C BOULEVARD' NAPLES. FLORIDA 34109 (239) 59B-2414 . FAX (239) 598-3745 L1C # CCCOSn79 S""""'9 ~ ad Lee ~ 600 zq 'feM4 "When You Want!t Done Ri hi" www.kin rootio com Name: Patrick Phelps Phone: 775-5068 Date: 12119/07 Address: 3043 Cottage Grove Ave Job Location: Same City, Slate. Zip: Naples. FL 34112 Date Scheduled Salesperson: William eKing General Soecifications 1. At the end of each workday, the working area will be made watertight to protect building from normal weather conditions. 2. The work area will be magnetically swept to pick-up left over nails. 3. All gutters will be cleaned of debris. 4. All work to be performed by K.mg Rooting Service wlii meet or exceed Manutacturers specltlcatlons and Florida building Code regulations. Job Site Preparation I. King Roofing Service will provide a container for the disposal of roofing materials. We will need to locate and prepare a convenient place for the container. 2. King Roofing Service will have extra felt and tarps ready to cover any exposed areas ofthe roof deck in case of sudden stonns. 3. King Roofing Service recommends that if you have any contents in your attic that you cover them with a tarp or plastic. Deck Preparation 1. Remove I layer roofmg and felt and haul away debris to landfill. 2. After removal of roof, wood decking will be inspected for rot and or suspect wood. 3. Any rotted wood to be replaced at the rate of$63.00 per 4x8 sheet. Fascia at 58.00 per hr plus materials 4. Due to plywood overhang King will install 150 feet preussure treated I x2 to perimeter of home. 5. Wood included in estimate to replace existing rotted wood-48 feet Ix6, 64 ft 2x6, 3 sheets 4x8 plywood. 6. After wood repair is complete King roofing shall code nail entire plywood roof deck with 8d ring shank nails 6 inches on center Underlavment Shingle ul,derla)im~l.t, which ;5 aboi,;omfi;unlj'i:.lie~ ftit j"):::.per, i~ ;.vuHabk fn '.:e':~':-'!""~: b,ades. Underlayment options: I. Install Tamko Tw secondary self adhered waterproofing underlayment per new code Ventilation As reauired bv the FHA. HUD and BOCA Buildin\! Codes. The National Roonn\! Contractors Association. and all Shin\!le Mannfacturers. vour monn\! svstem will reauire the followin\! ventilation. Options I. Install AR V exhaust vent as needed. Paint to match roofing. 2. Install 2 4ft off ridge vents to improve ventilation Flashinl!S I. Reuse flashings to sidewalls and chimneys as applicable. 2. Install new 26 gauge 2 'I, inch painted galvalume drip edge to perimeter of home. 3. Install new epdm soil stack boots to all protrusions as needed. Paint to match roofing Cont page 2 GBD -.Shgl-form U:Y\V\J "bJok ~ 11; 0 0 ~~;t(r} 1665 www.kingroofing.com ~~ --.-,.,""___.___~~..!k_ 17SS}&C BOUlEVARD' NAPlES. flOlUDA 34109 (21'J) S'J8-2414' fAX (l3'J) 598-J745 UC~CC;::QiZlli: Name: Patrick Phelps Phone: 775-5068 Date: 12/19107 Address: 3043 Cottage Grove Ave Job Location: Same City, State, Zip: Naples, FL 34112 Date Scheduled Salesperson: William eKing OPTIONS: Shingle Color _ Eave Co/or__~_"~__ Flat Roof Color 5 V crimp 26 Gauge Gall'u[umc Mil! finish ~ EPDM Soil Stack Boots Painted to match Shingle Color if Vented Ridge or ORV's if Painted Drip Edge Metai if Tamko Tw underlayment if Code nail 0.( plywood ro(?fdeck if Vented with 4 ji ojlridge vents ./ 10 Year Tran~rerable Labor Warranty Total Contraet Amount. 57,838.00 . ----- Approved Inti /' GUiiers ( included) / ..---~ ,/ t Remove _ e.xisting e;utters and hat!t away debris ,. " . . ",--"-- 2. Install new 6 inch-aluminum K style gutter-appro;::: 82 feet on right ana lelt sidt: c(ivec<Jges 3. Install3x4 commercial size downspouts Total Gutters- Any rotted wood to be replaced at the rate of$63.00 per 4x8 sheet. Fascia at 58.00 per hr plus materials · Please note additional layers of felt will be removed for additional .05 per sq ft per layer. Included: All permits, disposal, taxes, insurance and inspections. All employees are covered under our workers compensation insurance. "i /,::; dn no! use subs or e:-,:er,wi' insunlllcr. llolicies. We are Proud to be a "Drug Free Workplace". Please check our references and our archive of jobs, we will provide as many as you like. Payment Terms: $ Deposit (1/3 down,II3 upon dry in and ~"c. balance due upon full completion Accepted By: Date: (For company use only) This contract Accepted by: Dale All contracts are subject to review by the home office and may be terminated at anytime prior to start date. Contracts to be approved by a duly authorized representative. NOTE: This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within 15 days. L-OnrraC10r L-ertIttcahon Uetail Page Page 1 of2 1665 -- COlli~rO~D?lJ!lty Contractor Details Class Code: 1310 Class Description: ROOFING CONTR.-CERTIFIED Certification Number: 16483 Original Issue Date: 7/18/1995 Certification Status: ACTIVE Expiration Date: 8131/2008 County Comp Card: State Number: CCC 057279 State Expiration Date: 8131/2008 Doing Business As: KING ROOFING SERVICE, INC. Mailing Address: 1755 J & C BLVD NAPLES, FL 34109 Phone: (239)598-2414 Fax: (239)598-3745 Back http://apps2.colliergov .nettwebappslvisionlConCertlDetail.aspx?cert= 16483 1/22/2008 +1 16r.'t; ~ e~ \ Lullflj! 1\-1,lrc,s: P_I. \ Ik ~:, iBIS :--';"1'1,.,. 1-"L .HIO J DATE: 12120104 7- [so 0 ~ ( t,'l{) )L::-~)f--t~s " , :)\ l~cc /'Z.K.t-f,,!..ot~ v ()Iti(c Lo"uiOll: 2101 J&(: i'>h-,J. "lapb. FL .\410<) Phone: (239) 597-9007 Fa,,, (239) 598-4468 To: Pat Phelps 3043 Cottage Grove Ave. Naples. FL 341 12 lOB NAME/LOCATIOI PHON!;; (239)775-5068 lOB NUt1BER: PhelpsOI.KH WE HEREBY SUBMIT SPECIFICATION AND ESTIMATES FOR: Remove existing shingle roof. Haul away all roofing debris. Taxes. insurance, and permits are included in the base price. 5- V METAL ROOF I. Install self adhering secondary water barrier direct to roof deck. 2. Install 26 gauge galvalume metal eave drip. 3. Install 26 gauge galvalume metal flashing and counter flashing. 4. Install 40' of cobra vent at ridge. 5. Install 26 gauge galvalume metal roof panels mill finish. 6. Install 26 gauge galvalume hip and ridge metal. 7. Fasteners to be screws. 8. Replacement of rotted wood shall be based on time and material in addition to the base pro- posal amount. $55.00 per man hour plus 25% above cost of materials. 9. Issue a 20 year manufactures warranty. 10. Issue a 5 year Gulf Coast Roofing warranty. If either party to this contract fails to perform its duties under the contract, the prevailing party in any such dispute shall be entitled to recover its costs and attorney fees from the non prevailing party. WE PROPOSE hereby to furnish material and labor-complete in accordance with the above sDecifications for the sum of. Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars $7,800.00 Payment to be made as follows: 25% Deposit upon signing of contract, additional 40% on removal of roofing material, dry-in, metal delivery. Balance due upon completion. Authorized Signature All m..teriaJ I~ g....r..Ht~ to bE" II~ SJI"!'<ffit."d. All work to be .:o.nplet<!-d hi ;> profes~iOflIlI Ill"'"""r ",ccon::!lR& to Sb.Rd",rd pr"ctke~. Aoy ;dter..tions or devi..tio.. from .wOY" sp...:tfic;>tiOftS 'nvohring exu-.. co~ts willlw ex(<cut<!-d only Upo.l wnfte-n orde-rs, IInd wiG b...:ome- 1111 e-xt.... dlll..g<< _e..- ...nd IIb.ov.. fl... e..tin,...t<>. AU "'1:"-_"",,,(0< "....ti"!;....t u\><>'" ..trik..~. "",,,,dent.. Of .....,..y.. bc<yo"d our control. Owne.. to "oIlT'f"lir... tomlldo, ..nd oth.... ne"....s'..1' ins"rance. Our work"r.;;ut' fully Cov",r'!'d by Workers Compe-nsation h""unc... Acceptance of proposal: The above prices. ~pecjflcatjons and conditions are satisfact:ory and are Hereby accepted. You are authori:::ed to do the work as specified Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of Acceptance: Signature:_ Signature: Contractor CertIticatIon Detail Page 16Plrs of2 Collier Count\; -FLORIDA -- ~ Contractor Details Class Code: 1310 Class Description: ROOFING CONTR.-CERTIFIED Certification Number: 22726 Original Issue Date: 8/24/2001 Certification Status: ACTIVE Expiration Date: 8/31/2008 County COl11p Card: State Number: CCC 058172 State Expiration Date: 8/31/2008 Doing Business As: GULF COAST ROOFING CO., INe. Mailing Address: P.O. BOX 7818 NAPLES, FL 34101- Phone: (239)597-9007 Fax: (239)598-4468 Baek http://apps2.colliergov.net/webapps/vision/ConCert/Detail.aspx?eert=22726 1/22/2008 '\" "( -=- \,\"'t.., Jropusal ?eain eollteot oIttlHnillltlJl 3813 Arnold Avenue NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 643-5322 . Fax (239) 643-5893 www.ralnconlrolaluminum.c;om Pose No. _.16 bpJs ~ P.'\\ N'. Sv~ (1wt~ fb',J~H"'Sl I li I ,as~ . '\ o\L0- II .-- -oC: -() 'S;l,. "\""\5-1-\~5b 13'9 j P'ROflOSAl SU8Mrrrllc TO PHONE ~"'~ Q"R\Q< "\'<j5-5:,/;,8, ~'b?:DD l-~n ~Q~~ I .,-, "3' - ~~ "G '-ve 'i "~,M\?,,6A "'0"'\' c.... \. \. "'" \J<> ,",,'.. . fJJ'7 j .., CITY. STATE AAO liP CODE" ~ Joe LOCATION . . IV An\",.; ~\ '2,'"\\\';l. \3" ~"'""\_.,, c;(,,(\<._ ARCHITECT I DATE OF .....NS '\ I '0& ""ONE .., W. hereby tlubmit specifications and t1liotlmate$)~r: ~ f " ~eW\~v..... c>\~ c..~q.,~ ,_~,~ S"~~\\I CI:":~ ~~'~';"o.\\ \&l 5"'''''''''\.5$ ~\"""~"b"'" 6-,...,,,,,,,,, ..."c!l ~J(~ C>.\"'........a... I2.::'_"-'"~_-''' ,",0 \...~ S;, ~'n....t ~~.~ <-I.~ ~.r:-.~~.. " = X=:. Oct\.H p..,) S ~t"".~1i\ . CO\tttl ~('_l-..\.t ~ A. x: )( f"~( Ilx;.'t )( ,"" C NOTICE OF INYENTION TO FILE LIEN: You are hereby notified that seller Intends to file a lien in connection with this matelial and installation unless this invoice is paid as $taled. JIIr tIraplllll' hereby 10 furnish material and labor - complel& in accordance with above specifications.. for the SUm of' c::" ~ dollars ($ J <:> <> , =1 Payrnent to be made OIIlio tollows ~ ) \.)~_AJ r- ........'('\~'"i.~"".u AI n~ i:;. OUW"AIllead 10 bu ~~ $QOdtkrd. All WGI'It IQ b. COtrIplftIlId in il. WOlkmardikel IJIWftltlPt IlllWflllnlJ ta ~iItG~. MJ OlIICItAUohotdlaYi~onfromGllG'd~. kl~kMg9Xlr~OO6l'w11 btrwll' oMDd_1IptlIlWl'ilwtllfdcn,andwlll"-omQMw8cl)wyvOV'Ol'WIIIlcMIbCOCiMmllt.A118glWllllUI'$I ~1tUp:ln~~IlllOt~iDyandQW~.OwnerIl)GMryllio.lOm8dDand"~1ltY NuI61q, ~ workGl'i 1ft fully cmnd ~ WutkRlun'ii OoIlP,"*11ian lnIuranclit. ... PiIlII duo lWnIS WIll btI.- 1....por mOlleh iIPlI in cneQ\o'lillllh;:; ~t b rllf.l'I'etd ICI M .lUOMIly kif coIocClOO,lh& Cu.lunlllr ~ sh;)I:lIl1clkt'''~pQfl:ibltIotBltQ;lUffCo:;t;Uf\dlllktrnW)'~_ , . . Nttptanrt uf Ifrnpullul- The allov. price.. specific,ban. iJnd condition:; are satisfactory It,d CI!'e hereb~ accepted. You art: i2uthorized to do the work iJl; SlJIecltled. P'dyment will be made as outlil'ltd above. Date of Aceuptance: '- Authoriz'd ~ SJ, \" . Sle;oature Note: ~\. propa$lll may b~ withdri'Wn by us if' ~7~C(:ptOd with7:' ~.~-_.~-- -"'- 310 days. .b " Signature ._~--- SigrnUurs H31 H3 38'<1d Wflllt lOellNm Nlllel ,,/' E689EP95E1: IE:E8 8081:/P1:/18 16/ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MISCELLANEOUS CORESPOPNDENCE February 26, 2008 1. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS DIRECTED: A. Minutes: 1) Bavshore/Gatewav Triangle Local Redevelop Advisorv Board: Agenda of November 6,2007; December 4,2007; January 8, 2008. Minutes of November 6,2007; December 4,2007; January 8, 2008. 2) Collier Countv Citizens Corps: Agenda of December 19, 2007. Minutes of December 19,2007. 3) Collier Countv Code Enforcement Board - Form 1: Minutes of November 29, 2007. 4) Collier Countv Planning Commission - Form I: Agenda of February 7, 2008. Minutes of November 28,2007; December 6,2007. 5) Development Services Advisorv Committee: Minutes of January 9, 2008. 6) Emergencv Medical Services Advisorv Council: Minutes of December 19, 2007; January 17,2008. 7) Environmental Advisorv Council: Agenda of January 7,2008. 8) Fire Review Task Force: Minutes of October 30, 2007; November 30,2007; December 14, 2007; January 18,2008; February 1,2008. 9) Forest Lakes Roadwav and Drainage Advisorv Committee: Agenda of December 12, 2007; January 9,2008. Minutes of November 14, 2007; December 12, 2007. 10) Golden Gate Communi tv Center Advisorv Committee: Minutes of January 7,2008. 11) lmmokalee Master Plan and Visioning Committee: Minutes of October 17, 2007. . . , 161 12) Isle of Capri Fire Control District Advisory Committee: Agenda of January 3, 2008. Minutes of January 3, 2008. 13) Land Acquisition Advisory Committee: Agenda of February 11, 2008. 14) Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee: Agenda of December 20,2007; January 17,2008. Minutes of November 15, 2007; December 20, 2007. 15) Library Advisory Board: Agenda of January 23, 2008. Minutes of December 12,2007. 16) Pelican Bay Services Division Board: Minutes of February 6, 2008. 17) Public Vehicle Advisory Committee: Agenda of February 4, 2008. 18) Radio Road Beautification Advisory Committee: Agenda of December 18, 2007; January 15,2008. Minutes of November 20,2007; December 18, 2007. 19) Utility Authority - Form 1: Minutes of June 25, 2007. 20) Vanderbilt Beach Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee: Agenda of December 6,2007; January 3,2008. Minutes of November 1, 2007; December 6,2007. B. Other: 1) Hearing of the Collier County Special Magistrate: Minutes of January 4,2008; January 18, 2008. 2) Clam Bay Committee: Minutes of December 19, 2007. f>''''''. f. 'il TilE BAYSIIORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLl6JEV~'LO~ENT AGE~ECEIVED COM M U NIT y RED EVE LOP MEN T .\ G E N C Y JAN 1 8 2008 2740 8."-YSflORF. DRIVE, lINIT J7 "JAPLES, FL. J4Ll2 PHOT\JE 239.6H.llH FAX 239.775.4456 ;'::...8,::i t County Commissioners BA YSHORE/GA TEW A Y TRIANGLE LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD Tuesday November 6,2007,6:00 p.m. 2740 Bayshore Drive Unit 10, Naples FL 34112 Al!enda I. RollCall Fiala 'Qr____ Halas ~." ;JA".J-.--- Henning J:L:-G'--- Coyle.. ._ u::f::.-_. Coletta_ _~__.._ 2. Adoption of Agcnda 3. Adoption of Minutcs: Rcgular Mccting Octobcr 2, 2007. 4. Exccutivc Director: a. Projcct Updates 5. Old Business: a. Davis Blvd Strcct Lighting Projcct b. Discussion - January 29, 2008 Bonding Rcfcrendum c. Discussion - Advisory Board Standing Rules of Opcration 6. New Business: a. Request for Pa}mcnt - Public Financial Managcmcnt b. Discussion - Sidewalk Requiremcnts on Linda Drivc c. Discussion - Creating a CRA 501 c3 d. Discussion - Capital Improvement Plan 7. Citizcn Commcnts 8. Adjournment Note I: All CRA Advisory Board meetings are held in the Bayshore Gateway Meeting Room, 2740 Bayshore Drive, Unit 10. Note 2: All meetings are publicly noticed in the Harmon Turner Building (Administration Building), County web site: www.colliergov.net and on the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA web site: wwwcolliercra.com All meetings are held at the CRA Office Meeting Room. Please call the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle office at (239) 643-1115 if you have any questions about the meeting. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact David Jackson, 2740 Bayshore Drive, Unit 17, Naples, Florida, 34112, (239) 643-1115. Mise ComlS: I V I A I Date: Item#: :::c~ies to: / 16 , A 1 THE BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2740 BAYSHORE DRIVE IINIT 17 NAPLES, FL 34112 PI-lONE 239.643.111.; I'AX 239.775.4456 BAYSHORElGATEWAY TRIANGLE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LOCAL ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 6, 2007 MEETING The meeting of the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Advisory Board was called to order by Chairman Mr. Lindsey Thomas at 6:00 p.m. at the CRA Office Meeting Room 2740 Bayshore Drive Unit 10. 1. Roll Call: Present: Advisory Board Members: Lindsey Thomas, Chuck Gunther, Steve Main, Bruce Preble, Maurice Gutierrez, and Jill Barry. Excused Absence: Bill Mears, Ron Fowle and Karen Beatty. CRA Staff Present: David Jackson, Executive Director, Jean Jourdan Project Manager and Sue Trone Operations Analyst. County Staff Present: Ma~orie Student-Stirling, Assistant County Attorney, and Bob Tipton and John Miller from the County Transportation Division. 2. Adoption of Aaenda: Chairman Thomas asked if there were any additions or corrections to the published agenda, hearing none Mr. Thomas asked for a motion to approve the agenda: Motion: Mr. Preble. Second: Mr. Gutierrez. Approved 6-0. 3. Adoption of Minutes: Chairman Thomas asked for a motion to approve the October 2, 2007 regular Meeting Minutes: Motion Mr. Main. Second Mr. Preble. Approved 6-0. 4. Executive Director's Report: a. Project Updates: i. Mr. Jackson directed the Board's attention to the Board Packet memo detailing CRA projects updates. ii. Ms Trone Advised the Board of progress on updating the CRA's website and first edition of the CRA printed newsletter. 5. Old Business: a. Davis Blvd Street Liahtina Proiect. Mr. Jackson gave a summary of the Davis Blvd Street Lighting Project and introduced Mr. Bob Tipton and Mr. John Miller from the County Transportation Division to discuss CRA financial participation in the project. Mr. Tipton briefed the Board on the status of the project, and pointed out that if the CRA was going to pay for the decorative light poles instead of the standard FOOT poles, the cost would be $345,433.50, and that the total project was bid higher than the amount of the FOOT grant for standard lighting by $302.013.49. Mr. Jackson stated that the CRA has budgeted for the decorative poles since 2004 and has increase the amount each year to meet expected cost increases. For the FY08 budget, $200,000 was set aside. He also stated that the Advisory Board had several options to weigh: do a budget amendment for $145,433 to meet the increased cost for decorative light poles or not pay for the decorative poles and not expend the money. He reminded the Board that no matter which option they recommend, the project will still be short $301,013.49, and the Transportation Division has asked the Board to consider a contribution of that amount in addition to the poles. Mr. Jackson advised the Board that there was sufficient funds in reserves to contribute the additional funds to cover the shortfall, or maybe consider loaning the amount to the County, to be repaid next November 6 2007 eRA-AB Minutes 16 I f.~ 'If ~ fiscal year. These options should be considered to prevent the project from being delayed another year. After a roundtable discussion on the project and the funding options for the poles and total project, the Board came to consensus that they desired to have the project completed this year. Motion by Mr. Gunther to not fund the cost of the decorative poles and offer to loan the $301,013.49 to the County to be repaid out of their FY09 budget. Second: Ms Barry. In discussion, Russell Rosen in the audience asked about solar lighting. Mr. Tipton stated that research indicates that they don't work well in Florida. Mr. Gunther asked why they lights weren't being put in the median at a cost savings. Mr. Tipton said that FOOT would not allow it. The motion failed to pass 2-4; Gunther and Barry for; Main. Preble, Thomas. Gutierrez against. Mr. Main stated that he felt that an offer of a loan to the County would not be well received. He felt that since the CRA had already budgeted the $200.000 for expenditure for this project that they gift the $200,000 towards the project and have the County make up the difference. Mr. Main asked Mr. Tipton where the extra $100,000 would come from. He said that it would have to come out of the Divisions contingency fund or another project. Motion by Mr. Preble to not pay for decorative light poles, contribute the CRA's $200,000 towards the project under the condition that the project is completed this year and the County makes up the difference. Second: Mr. Gutierrez. Approved 6-0. Mr. Jackson told Mr. Tipton that he would get a memorandum to him stating the Advisory Board's recommendation and a CRA Agenda Executive Summary with a draft budget amendment to take to the BCC. b. January 29, 2008 BondinQ Referendum. Mr. Jackson detailed the activities to date conceming the CRA's task to research the requirements for a bonding referendum and draft referendum language for the ballot. He recommended that the CRA wait until the Florida Supreme Court publishes its findings which would not be until the end of January 2008 to see if the CRA had to do a referendum. He also stated that with the holidays, short timeframe until the voting date and the significant public awareness campaign required to educate the public, the vote may fail. Mr. Jackson recommended that the CRA wait until the November Presidential election. Mr. Thomas stated that he felt that there was no downside to taking the referendum to a January vote. Even if it fails, the CRA can try again in November. Ms Barry said that Conservation Collier program was passed by the public. Mr. Main said that Conservation Collier was for the whole county and a different type of issue, and that this might be seen as a tax issue or tax increase. He felt that the CRA would need a tremendous marketing campaign and there isn't time to do it. The CRA should not risk failure in January. Motion to recommend to the CRA to not put the referendum on the January 29, 2008 ballot: Mr. Main. Second: Mr. Gunther. Approved 5-1; Mr. Thomas against. c. Advisory Board Standing Rules of Operation. Mr. Thomas stated that since Mr. Mears was not present and that this was coming from his subcommittee, he recommended that the Board table the issue until the next meeting. Motion by Mr. Main to table. Second: Mr. Gutierrez. Approve 6-0. 6. New Business: a. Request for Pavment - Public Financial ManaQement (PFM). Mr. Jackson discussed the invoice from PFM that included work leading up to the CRA RFP for a $9,000,000 line of credit in the amount of $7.428.00. Motion to pay: Mr. Gunther. Second: Ms Barry. Approved 6-0. b. Discussion - Sidewalk Requirements on Linda Drive. Mr. Jackson explained the background on the sidewalk issue identified by the County Zoning Department November 6 2007 eRA-AS Minutes 2 161A 1 and the developer, Mr. Rosen. Mr. Jackson introduced Mr. Michael Clough, P.E. for the developer and Mr. Rosen who were in attendance to speak to the topic. Mr. Clough stated that the SDP for the street required a sidewalk the length of the development on the north side of the street. The developer has an option to not install the sidewalk and make a "payment in lieu of' to the County. He also stated that the LDC required a seven foot wide sidewalk and that it would be difficult to install. Also there are two existing homes that would require a costly modification to retrofit in a sidewalk over their lots. Mr. Jackson asked if the developer would consider meandering the sidewalk towards the edge of the street at those lots to minimize the impact and cost. After discussion a motion for the staff to support the developer's request to install a four-foot sidewalk and meander it at the two developed lots: Mr. Gunther. Second: Mr. Gutierrez. Approved 6-0. c. Discussion - Creatina a CRA 501 c3. Mr. Jackson asked for the Board to consider the creation of one or more non-profit entities that would support the goals and objectives of the CRA Master Redevelopment Plan. The Board members expressed that they were unsure of the requirements or legal authority to do so, and ask Mr. Jackson to retum with more information. d. Discussion - Capital Improvement Plan. Mr. Thomas recommended that the item be tabled until Mr. Mears retumed. Motion to table until the next meeting Ms Barry. Second: Mr. Gutierrez. Approved 6-0. 7. Citizen Comments. Mr. Thomas asked if there were any comments from the audience. There were none. 8. Adioumment: The regular meeting was adjoumed at 7:47 pm. y Lindsey Thomas, CRA-AB Chairman. App November 6 2007 eRA-AS Minutes 3 THE BAYSHORE/GATEWAY RECEIVED AGENCY COM M U NIT Y RED EVE LOP MEN TAG ENe Y JAN 1 8 2008 T R I A NG LJ~QJ;~E 1.01 ENT 2740 BAYSHORE DRIVE, {INI'f 17 N_>\.'LES, FL 34112 IllIONE 239.643.1115 F:\x 2J9.775.4ffiB~rdofcountyCommissloners BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD Tuesday December 4, 2007, 6:00 p.m. 2740 Bayshore Drive Unit 10, Naples FL 34112 Al!enda 1. RollCall Fiala Halas Henning Coyle '::oletta 2. Adoption of Agenda 3. Adoption of Minutes: Regular Meeting November 6, 2007. 4. Prcsentations: a. Cultural Nceds Assessmcnt ~ Arthur Grecnburg, AMS Planning & Research b. South Bayshore Drive Improvement Proposal ~ Bill Neal, MSTU Chairman c. Community Alliance of Bayshore (CAB) - William Baycs, CAB Secrctary 5. Executivc Director: a. Projcct Updates 6. Old Business: a. Discussion - Advisory Board Standing Rulcs of Opcration b. Discussion - Capitallmprovcmcnt Plan 7. Ncw Business: a. Bayshore Cultural Arts (BCA) Evcnt Support Requcst - Sondra Quinn, BCA President b. Sweat Equity Grant Approval (Residcntial - John Hotz) - Tronc c. Site Improvement Grant Approval (Commercial - Seyler & Rcsidcntial - Pallis) - Trone d. Approve Attcndance at Housing Conference - Tronc c. January 2008 CRA-AB Meeting Datc Change to January 8, 2008 f. Noticc of January CRA-AB Election of Officers for 2008 8. Citizcn Commcnts 9. Adjournment Note I: All CRA Advisory Board meetings are held in the Bayshore Gateway Meeting Room, 2740 Bayshore Drive, Unit 10. Note 2: All meetings are publicly noticed in the Harmon Turner Building (Administration Building), County web site: www.colliergov.net and on the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA web site: www.colliercra.com. All meetings are held at the CRA Office Meeting Room. Please call the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle office at (239) 643-1 ] ] 5 if you have any questions about the meeting. ]f you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact David Jackson, 2740 Bayshore Drive, Unit ]7, Naples, Florida, 34] ]2, (239) 643-]] ]5. Misc. Corres ll.o \ ft \ Date Item#: COPies to: J TilE BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE '1'~}lA ., RED' E ~ E LOP M ~ T AGENCY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2740 B,,,"YSHORE DRIYE Ur.;IT 17 NAPLES, FL 34112 PIIONE 239.643.1115 FAX 239.775.4456 BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LOCAL ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 4, 2007 MEETING The meeting of the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Advisory Board was called to order by Chairman Mr. Lindsey Thomas at 6:00 p.m. at the CRA Office Meeting Room 2740 Bayshore Drive. Unit 10. 1. Roll Call: Present: Advisory Board Members: Lindsey Thomas, Chuck Gunther, Steve Main, Bill Mears, Ron Fowle. Karen Beatty, Maurice Gutierrez. and Jill Barry. Absent: Bruce Preble. CRA Staff Present: David Jackson. Executive Director, Jean Jourdan Project Manager and Sue Trone Operations Analyst County Staff Present: Marjorie Student-Stirling, Assistant County Attorney. 2. Adoption of Aaenda: Chairman Thomas asked if there were any additions or corrections to the published agenda, Ms Trone asked that Site Improvement Grant for Ms Francis Pallis be considered in New Business. Mr. Thomas asked for a motion to approve the agenda as amended: Motion: Mr. Mears. Second: Mr. Main. Approved 8-0. 3. Adoption of Minutes: Chairman Thomas asked for a motion to approve the November 6, 2007 regular Meeting Minutes: Motion Ms Barry. Second Mr. Gutierrez. Approved 8-0. 4. Presentations: a. Cultural Needs Assessment Mr. Jackson introduced Mr. Arthur Greenberg representing AMS Planning & Research. Inc., the company contracted to perform the local cultural needs assessment for the CRA. Mr. Greenberg gave an overview of the mission of AMS Planning & Research. He outlined the scope of work that AMS was contracted to perform, and detailed what the potential outcomes could be. He summarized the preliminary results of the day-long interviews he had just conducted and added that he would be launching an internet-base survey also for the leadership of Collier County cultural facilities and organizations to fill out Mr. Greenberg summarized that he should be able to complete his report in February 2008. Mr. Gunther asked if Mr. Greenberg had been to the County Historical Museum or been around Collier County. Mr. Greenberg outlined his personal work in 2004 when he condLlcted the Collier County United Arts Council (UAC) county-wide cultural needs assessment Mr. Thomas thanked Mr. Greenberg for the informative update and that the Advisory Board would be looking forward to his report in February 2008. b. South Bayshore Drive Improvement Proposal. Mr. Jackson summarized_the information in the Board's meeting packet and the recent meeting he had with Mr. Bill Neal. Chairman of the Bayshore Beautification MLlnicipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU). about potential partnership with the MSTU to improve Bayshore Drive south of Thomasson Drive. Mr. Jackson listed the possible steps that would have to take place and the need for a formal agreement between the CRA & MSTU to proceed with the project. He introduced Mr. Bill Neal. Mr. Neal stated that the MSTU continues to improve Bayshore Drive, and are currently replacing Buttonwood Trees with new palms and have an agreement with a strip mall owner to install some new vegetation near his facility. Mr. Neal said that the December 4 2007 CRA-AB Minutes ~! 161~. 1 MSTU initially had only enough money to improve Bayshore Drive to Thomasson Drive, and now foresee having the funds to continue farther south. He stated that Mr Jackson's summary accurately detailed his conversation and appears to be the best way to approach the task, if the CRA desires to partner with the MSTU. He asked that if the Advisory Board had interest that Mr. Jackson attend the next MSTU meeting on December 12, 2007 to discuss options with the MSTU Board and staff Mr. Thomas asked how much money does the MSTU have earmarked for the project? Mr. Neal stated that they have approximately $1.8M ready for the project and receives $800-900K per year in annual revenues. He said that is the CRA joins in on the initial study that the MSTU would most likely put up the majority of the construction funds, and that the MSTU could start right away. Mr. Gunther asked if the developers of Sabal Bay (the Colliers) had been contacted or approached to be a part of the project? Mr. Neal said, no not directly, and he felt the first step was to get a design or plan on paper so the MSTU and CRA could show them what they would be 'buying in to'. Motion by Mr. Mears to join in with the MSTU 50%-50% for the cost of the study to be followed by further approval for engineering-design contracts, and for the CRA Executive Director to attend the MSTU meeting to discuss the project and agreement. Second Ms Beatty. Approved 8-0. c. Community Alliance of Bavshore (CAB). Mr. Jackson gave a summary of how a subcommittee was appointed by the CRA-AB to do some grassroots visioning and public outreach to the residents, property owners and business operators within the CRA boundary and report back to the CRA-AB with suggestions and recommendations. He introduced Ms Sondra Quinn to present those recommendations, and that she was standing in for Mr. William Bayes. Ms Quinn thanked the CRA-AB for the time to present the group's findings and recommendations. Ms Quinn covered the strategic framework that the group had developed and reviewed the material in the Board's meeting packets - Organizational Structure, Board Responsibilities. Committee Job Descriptions, and Goals & Objectives. She also mentioned that the group started out with the name Bayshore Community Alliance (BCA), however the acronym was confusing with Bayshore Cultural Arts (BCA), so the name was changed to Community Alliance of Bayshore (CAB). Recently there was some discussion about expanding the name to be broader to reflect a greater influence on the region - Naples Bay Corridor Alliance (NBCA). Mr. Thomas congratulated Ms Quinn on the group's progress. Ms Barry asked if the group had a desire to operate under the CRA structure but segregate dues, donations and funds? Ms Student-Stirling, Assistant COLlnty Attorney explained that the group could become a subcommittee under the CRA, but that it could not be private (501c3) and be a part of the CRA or government. 5. Executive Director's Report: a. Proiect Updates. Mr. Jackson gave a short powerpoint presentation of activities within the CRA as an update to the Board. 6. Old Business: a. Advisory Board Standino Rules of Operation. Mr. Jackson gave a summary of the sequence of events concerning this topic. Motion by Ms Beatty to approve the staff's submission of standing rules. Second: Ms Barry. In discussion Mr. Mears stated that the intent of the standing rules, as adopted in the updated by- laws. was that the rules would be for the Advisory Board, not the staff - as they are currently written. Mr. Jackson stated that he misunderstood the direction or the intent of the Board and that his submission was written with the staff in mind. December 4 2007 CRAMAB Minutes 2 ,,':" ~ A 161 1 Mr. Mears recommended that this item not be approved and that the original By- Laws Subcommittee reconvene to draft the standing rules. Ms Barry withdrew her second and Ms Beatty withdrew her motion. b. Capital Improvement Plan. Mr. Jackson stated that he did not have anything additional to report on this topic L1ntil the results of the Florida Supreme Court published its ruling and the January 29,2008 Presidential Primary Property Tax Referendum results are known. Motion to table this item indefinitely. Mr. Mears. Second Mr. Main. Approved 8-0. 7. New Business: a. Bavshore Cultural Arts (BCA) Event Support Request. Mr. Jackson directed the Board to the Bayshore Cultural Arts backup information in the Board's packet and introduced Ms Sondra Quinn to present her request for financial support from the CRA for the Hearts in the Garden event at the Naples Botanical Garden. Ms Quinn gave an event overview and focus of the event, and stated that the event was supported last year by the CRA Advisory Board. She discussed the budget and request $5,000 promotions and marketing support for the 2008 event to be held on February 14, 2008. Motion to recommend to the CRA Board to provide $5,000 sponsorship from the CRA's Promotions and Marketing budget as reimbursement for fixed event costs: Mr. Main. Second: Ms Beatty. Discussion: Mr. Mears stated that the CRA gave $5,000 last year and he thought it was a one-time sponsorship as a start-up assistance. He felt there were other options that the CRA could provide to assist the group: 1) lend the money to the group, or 2) buy 150 tickets at $35/ticket to give to the underserved community (chLlrches and schools) that would not be able to afford to attend. The mission of the CRA is infrastructLlre. Ms Beatty said she like the ideas but was not sure that they were doable. If the CRA loaned the money, the BCA may not be able to pay back soon, for the BCA to carry on the flame of the 'cultural district'. it takes lots of work and time to get that established. She felt that the sponsorship again this year was worth it. Mr. Gunther explained that the CRA would not be "giving" away the money. but investing it into the community and an organization that is giving back to the commLlnity. He felt that even though this is a second request, all the CRA-AB needs to do is justify the sponsorship to the CRA Board. Mr. Main stated that he felt the sponsorship was in the mission of the CRA. and yes, infrastructure is too, but this is part of the whole concept. Approved 6-1 (Mears against) Ms Barry (Naples Botanical Garden representative) abstained. b. Sweat EQuitv Grant Approval (Residential - John Hotz). Mr. Fowle excused himself from the meeting. Ms Trone explained the CRA's new Sweat Equity Grant and detailed the CRA's first application for Mr. John Hotz' rental property on Captains' Cove. He and his renter will do the work consisting of landscape and irrigation, repaint the house and make repairs to the driveway. The estimated cost of materials is over $1.000 and meets the requirements of the Sweat Equity Grant. Motion to recommend to the CRA Board to approve: Mr. Gunther. Second: Mr. Main. Approved 7-0. c. Site Improvement Grant Approval (Commercial - Randv Sevier). Ms Trone briefed the CRA-AB on the commercial site improvement grant for the old Ship's Inn building, owned by Bayshore Road Holdings, LLC, which is transitioning to the Tiki Beer Bar under the proprietorship of Ms Heidi Cochran. The improvements include new signage, fencing, landscaping and installation of rain gLitter. The total project cost come to $3.828.03 which qualifies for a33% match December 4 2007 CRA.AB Minutes 3 161 A~ grant of $1.266.55. Motion to recommend to the CRA Board for approval, pending review and approval of the County Attomey's office: Mr. Mears. Second: Mr. Main. Approved 7-0. Ms Trone briefed the Board on the add-on agenda item, Site Improvement Grant for Ms Francis Pallis. This is a residential grant to replace existing windows and a door with impact resistant windows and storm proof door. Total cost for the project is $14,947.00 which qualifies for a 33% match of $4,935.51. Motion to recommend to the CRA Board for approval, pending review and approval by the County Attomey's office: Mr. Mears. Second: Mr. Gunther. Approved 7-0. d. Approve Attendance at Housina Conference. Ms Trone briefed the CRA-AB on her request to attend a state-wide Housing Conference on January 15. 2008. Motion to approve: Mr. Gunther. Second: Ms Beatty. Approved 7-0. e. January 2008 CRA-AB Meetina Date Chanae to January 8. 2008. Mr. Jackson reminded the CRA-AB that the first Tuesday in January is the 1st, and recommended that the Board move their meeting date one week to January 8, 2008 at 6PM. Motion to move the date: Ms Barry. Second: Mr. GLlnther. Approved 7-0. f. Notice of January CRA-AB Election of Officers for 2008. Mr. Thomas reminded the members that the Board elects a Chairman and Vice Chairman in January of each year and that this will be on the agenda next month. 8. Citizen Comments. Mr. Thomas asked if there were any comments from the audience. There were none. 9. Adiournment: The regular meeting was adjourned at 7:35 pm. and forwarded by Lindsey Thomas, CRA-AB Chairman. P.."t........ b...v f N 4. . '<;; I" b l. I % 2 0 0 7 eRA - A B M i nut e 5 4 16'1 A 1 THE BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT RFCE!VED AREA~ A. G E N C Y FFfi G d 2008 27.JO 8AY~HORE DRIVE, (lNIT 17 N.-\PLES, FL 34112 PHONE 239.643.1115 FAX 239.775.4~13~-r;cH:i}t,n~'JC(!f1'miSsjoners BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD Tuesday January 8, 2008, 6:00 p.m. 2740 Bayshore Drive, Unit 10, Naples, FL 34112 Al!:enda l. RollCall Fiala y~ ~ Halas -#. f~e. nnin9,%".h) If' 0:- ;joyle .~-- ~lJletta~~- 2. Adoption of Agenda 3. Adoption of Minutes: Regular Meeting December 4, 2007. 4. Executivc Director: a. Project Updatcs: I. CRA Newsletter - Trone II. January 25, 2008 CRA & CRA-AB Joint Workshop 5. Old Business: a. MSTU Meeting Brief - South Bayshore Drive Improvement 6. New Business: a. Approve Quotes for Trailer Demolition - Jourdan b. Bayshore Corridor Strategic Developmcnt Vision c. Elections: CRA-AB Chairman & Vice Chairman 7. Citizcn Comments 8. Adjournment Note: All meetings are publicly noticed in the Harmon Tumer Huilding(Administration Building). Please call the Bayshore/Triangle otlice at (239) 643-1115 if you have any questions ahout the meeting. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in Ihis proceeding. you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Ph~ase .::ontact the Collier County Facilities 11anagement Department located at 3301 Ea'" Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. 34112, (239) 774-8380: assisted 1i~1ening devices for the hearing impaired are a...-ailable in the County Commissioner:.; Otlice. Mise Cot'lllll: DatelL ( .~ l :~em#: -;.~ to j THE BAYSIIORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVEI~~'lNT4GE1;\ COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2740 B_-\\'SHORE DRIVE tlNlT 17 NU'I.ES, rL 3,4112 PHONE 2l9,64J.IIL<; r,,\X 239.775,4456 BAYSHORElGATEWAY TRIANGLE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LOCAL ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 8, 2007 MEETING The meeting of the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Communily Redevelopment Advisory Board was called to order by Chairman Mr. Lindsey Thomas at 6:00 p.m. at the CRA Office Meeting Room 2740 Bayshore Drive, Unit 10. 1. Roll Call: Present: Advisory Board Members: Lindsey Thomas. Chuck Gunther, Steve Main. Bill Mears, Ron Fowle, Karen Beatty. Maurice Gutierrez, Jill Barry, and Bruce Preble. CRA Staff Present: David Jackson, Executive Director, Jean Jourdan Project Manager and Sue Trone Operations Analyst. County Staff Present: Marjorie Student-Stirling. Assistant County Attomey. 2. Adoption of Aoenda: Chairman Thomas asked if there were any additions or correclions to the published agenda. Hearing none he asked for a molion 10 approve the agenda: Motion: Mr. Main. Second: Mr. Fowle. Approved 9-0. 3. Adoption of Minutes: Chairman Thomas asked for a motion to approve the December 4, 2007 regular meeting minutes: Motion: Mr. Main. Second: Mr. Gunther. Approved 9-0. 4. Executive Director's Report: a. Proiect Updates. Mr. Jackson gave a showed a CRA marketing video from Florida Redevelopment Association. Ms Trone distributed the inaugurai CRA newsletter to the Board for their review. She explained that the goal was to publish the newsletter quarterly. Mr. Jackson reminded the Board that there was a scheduled joint workshop with the CRA and that Immokalee CRA Advisory Board was invited to participate. b. Mr. Mears asked for a status of the 17 acre disposition. He wondered if il was possible to open up the property to the public for use until a project had been identified. Mr. Fowle stated that there had been some private party interest expressed in discussions with the staff and that there was some interest in a private offer for the land. Mr. Thomas stated that we have a scope of work developed for the RFP that has not been advertised yet. Mr. Jackson slated Ihat the residential sales markel has collapsed with over two sheets of CRA homes on the MLS. The CRA condo market is active for empty nesters or those in the second home market. Indications are the commercial market is slowing and will continue to slow until the residential market steadies. Since this project is a mixed use development (residential and commercial). and in light of other southwest Florida mixed use projects being put on hold, the RFP has not been released. 5. Old Business: a. MSTU Meetino Brief - South Bayshore Improvemenls. Mr. Jackson updaled the Board on Ihe results of the Bayshore Beautification MSTU board meeting where the MSTU agreed to jointly fund the initial field survey. right-of-way study and development of initial designs to improve the conidor. The MSTU also agreed to allow the CRA to take the lead to develop the scope of work. contact transportation consultants and acquire a quote for services. The draft scope of work for conceptual design selVices and follow-on 'work orders' to continue the engineering designs are included in the Boards packets. Motion to proceed and acquire contractor quotes for the scope of serves: Mr. Mears. Second: Ms Beatty. Approved 9-0. b. MSTU Meetino Brief - South Bayshore Drive Street Liohts. Mr. Jackson advised the Board that the MSTU was interested in funding additional temporary lights on the southern section for Bayshore Drive 10 complement the seven lights the CRA was January 8 2008 eRA-AS Minutes 16 I A 1 installing. The MSTU agreed to let Ihe CRA take the lead, contacl FPL for a field survey and quote to install lights on selected poles. The MSTU approved the expenditure of up 10 $3.000 per year for the lights, and they would repay the CRA through an intergovernmental transfer. 6. New Business: a. Approve Quotes for Trailer Demolition. Ms Jourdan presented two quotes for demolition services for nine trailers in the Bayshore residential infill area. She asked for approval 10 contract Cross Environmental Services for demo services for nine trailers at $22,699.00. and Gruelle Construction to demo one single family home for $3,170.00. Total cost for demolnion services is $25,869.00. Motion to approve: Ms Barry. Second: Mr. Preble. Approved 9-0. b. Bavshore Corridor Strateqic Development Vision. Mr. Jackson presented a proposal for the CRA to create a strategic development vision for the Bayshore corridor to quantify vacant commercial parcels. investigate the development potential of the sites and determine incentives to offer as a catalyst to redevelop sites. He stated that in the Board packets there was a draft CRA Resolution that would charter the study and create an ad hoc committee to perform the tasks. The committee would report to the Advisory Board their findings and recommendations. Mr. Mears asked that this type of work is the Advisory Boards job, so why was a differenl committee being created. Mr. Main agreed that there would be a long education process for this new group and they would be redundant to the Advisory Board. Mr. Gunter also agreed. Ms Beatty felt that including new people would invigorate the communny and draw in new ideas. Mr. Mears felt that the CRA should contract a consultant to revise the CRA redevelopment Plan. Ms Barry felt that a consultant wouldn't have the interest of the community, they would just do the work and leave. Ms Beatty thought Ihat a 2 year revision of the CRA Plan was 100 long right now, and that Bayshore Drive corridor should be looked at soon. After a lengthy roundtable discussion, Mr. Gunther made the motion to table Ihis item. Second: Mr. Preble. Approved 9-0. Mr. Jackson asked the Board if they would consider conducting a workshop in two weeks to further discuss the item so it could be brought back in February. Motion: Ms Beatty to hold a workshop on January 22, 2008 at 6PM. Second: Mr. Gutierrez. Approved 8-1, Mr. Mears against. c. Advisorv Board Election of Officers for 2008. Mr. Main nominated Mr. Thomas for Chairman and Mr. Mears for Vice Chairman. Mr. Mears said he would second the nomination for Mr. Thomas but that he was term limned and would not be able to serve the full term. Mr. Main modified his nomination to be for Mr. Thomas for Chairman. Second: Mr. Mears. Approved 9-0. Motion by Ms Beatty to nominate Ms Barry as Vice Chairman. Second: Mr. Gutierrez. Approved 9-0. 7. Citizen Comments. Mr. Thomas asked if there were any comments from the audience. There were none. 8. Adioumment: The regular m~as adjourned at 7:45 pm. / .---- indsey Thomas. CRA-AB Chairman. Approved and 1.0 January 8 2008 eRA-AS Minutes 2 161A '""\ c.. "~"""r-.EIVED ; ., ~~-. . '..~t _ . .~ \ ., '2008 ;.."." I.' ,,2~, t. ,} " Fiala Halas Henning. Coyle Coletta _ Citizen Corps Advisory Committee Agenda December 19, 2007 (Physicians Regional - Collier) ,ejl!': (Jj (~ollni\l CmrmllSS!OnP,(S 3:00 Pledge of Allegiance -Opening Remarks -Roll Call Chairman Sheriff's Office CERV USCGA Red Cross Chamber of Commerce Fire Chiefs CERT CAP Veterans Council RSVP Salvation Army EMS City of Naples PRMC Health Dept Everglades City NCH Medical Examiner City of Marco Island Neighborhood Watch EM 3:05 Approval of Minutes Chairman 3:10 Threat Update Sheriffs Office 3:15 New Business Chairman . Elections Chairman . Homeland Security Joe Frazier . ESC Tour Jim von Rinteln 3:30 Old Business Chairman . EOC Update . Flu Shots Jim von Rinteln Mary Ann Cole 3:45 Next Meeting/Adjourn (January 167 ) Chairman 3:46 Tour of Hospital Mise Carres: 10 I A?" Dale: Ilem# I), '" " / ColeMaryAnn 1 6 r, ;~1 ,"\ ff l4 c.. Subject: ColeMaryAnn Tuesday, December 18. 2007 12:25 PM BowmanDan; Capt. Alejandro Castillo; CC-Dan Zunzunegul; CC-Debbie Horvath; CC.Gerry Sugerman; CC-Jerry Sanford; CC-Jim Elson; CC-Joe Wilkins; CC-John Brown; CC-Mike Murphy; CC-Nfnl1555; CC-Scott Erickson; CC-Ted Soliday; ColeMaryAnn; 'DanAnderson@tdle.state.fl.us'; David Baer; DeArmasMaribel; Doug Porter (dporter143 @comcast.net); foord_m; FrazlerJoseph; Judy Nuland; Kathleen_Marr@doh.state.fl.us; Phil Reid; reg buxton; Russ Rainey; Ryan Frost; schapin43@aol.com; scribnerj; TeachScott; veitj; vonrintelnj; Walt Jaskiewicz Meeting Reminder From: Sent: To: Importance: High All, Just a reminder that the Citizen Corps will meet Wednesday, December 19th at 3 p.m. at Physicians Regional (8300 Collier Boulevard) in the lobby. We need a quorum for elections being held, so please be there. Thank you! ~ ann Mary Ann Cole Collier County Emergency Management 3301 East Tamlami Trail, Bldg F Naples, FL 34112 Phone (239) 252-8000 Fax (239) 775-5008 www.collierqov.net 16 , If'lf! Collier County Government Communication & Customer Relations Department 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Contact: Sandra Arnold Public Information Coordinator (239) 252-8308 www.colliereov.net Dec. 12, 2007 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING COLLIER COUNTY CITIZEN CORPS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA WEDNESDA Y, DECEMBER 19,2007 3 p.m. The Collier County Citizen Corps Advisory Committee will meet Wednesday, December 19 at 3 p.m. at the Physicians Regional Medical Center, located at 8300 Collier Boulevard, Naples. Please meet in the main hospital lobby prior to 3 p.m. In regard to the public meeting: All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the board/committee prior to the meeting if applicable. All registered public speakers will be limited to three minutes unless permission for additional time is granted by the chairman. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board of County Commissioners or quasi-judicial board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Collier County Ordinance No. 2004-05, as amended, requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners, an advisory board or quasi-judicial board), register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. For more information, call Jim von Rinteln at 252-8000. -End- 1/ '.~~esf ~ 161A ,~,.,.~~ RECEIVED JAN :! J 2008 1 ~ Fiala Halas Henning Coyle Coletta. ..- -.---- V oting Members Present: Collier County Citizen Corps Advisory Committee December 19, 2007 13u;:1I"0 oj County Commissioners Russell Rainey, Community Emergency Response Team Gerry Sugarman, RSVP Walter Jaskiewicz, Coast Guard Auxiliary Lt. George Welch, Collier County Sheriff's Office Reg Buxton, Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce Deborah Horvath, American Red Cross Doug Porter, Naples Civil Air Patrol Voting Members Absent: (Excused Absence) Jerry Sanford, Collier County Fire Chiefs Assoc James Elson, Collier County Veterans Council Captain Alejandro Castillo, Salvation Army Floyd Chapin, Community Emergency Response Volunteers V oting Members Absent: (Non-Excused Absence) Non-Voting Members Present: Jim von Rinteln. Collier County Emergency Management Joe Frazier, Collier County Emergency Management Chris Rakunas, Physicians Regional Medical Center Bob Wetenkamp, Physicians Regional Medical Center Meeting called to order at 3:00 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance recited and roll call taken. Approval of Minutes Motion to accept the minutes of the November 21, 2007 meeting made by Gerry Sugarman and seconded by Debbie Horvath. Approved unanimously. Threat Update Per Lt. Welch, there is no change - we are still at the Elevated Threat (Yellow) level. New Business Misc. Corres. I (p I IT 2- Date: Elections Reg Buxton elected Chairman. Russ Rainey elected Vice-Chairman. Jerry Sanford elected Secretary. Vote for positions was unanimous. !!em# u; Homelalld Security Joe Frazier attended a conference in Orlando and shared a few highlights. It was attended by homeland security people, including Secret Service, FBI and CIA. Through intelligence, we are expecting a suicidal/homicidal bombing to come to this country after the Presidential elections as a political statement. Looked at bomber profiling, which entices people who are hopeless and helpless, and motivate them through the promise of heaven j 161 A ~".'\ C ~ Collier County Citizen Corps Advisory Committee December 19,2007 and paradise. 78 of the bomber's family will get into heaven as well. There was footage of children 3-10 years of age training. They use the American and Israeli flags as floor mats and train them with live ammunition. Terrorists are looking at hitting transportation areas, ports, etc. Terrorism money right now is very limited. We need to be ever-vigilant. Public School buses and rail systems arc easy targets, as they are on set schedules. It was determined that commerce is impacted $50k for every 15 minutes that roads are shut down. We need to get out of our complacency' Joe has a full report on this conference - Jim von Rinteln will send it to the group. ESC TOllr Per Jim Y., the Citizen Corps group will not be able to tour the ESC at the topping ceremony tomorrow. Will know better in January when the group can tour the building safely. The topping ceremony tomorrow is a Kraft Construction Company-sponsored party, beginning at 11:30. You can park at Edison College and be shuttled to the site. All are invited as a support group; however, you cannot go into the building. Old Business EOC Update Per Jim Y., the project is ahead of schedule and in budget. There is still lots to be done. We got additional funding of S325k from the Justice Department, to be used for technology in the building. This will allow us to get computers, NY equipment, radios, additional antennas, etc. We are looking at December 2008 or January 2009- the EOC to be open and functional by hurricane season of 2009. 23 Counties in Florida are building new Emergency Services Centers. EMS should be moving in around the same time. Per Lt. Welch, the 911 Center is on their own schedule - the Sheriffs Office priority is to get operations in there by June 2009. Fill Shots Per Mary Ann Cole, the Collier County Health Department is offering a final day of flu and pneumonia vaccines on January 7"' from 9 a.m. to 12 noon at the Senior Friendship Center, 811 7'h Avenue South in Naples. Physicians Regional Medical Center does not offer flu shots - check the walk in-clinics to see if they are giving any vaccines Anyone over 50 should get the flu shot, and if over 60, get the pneumonia shot. If you are susceptible, you should get these shots if you are over 50. Other Walt Jaskiewicz suggested that the Citizen Corps put together a float and enter a parade next year. It would be a great way to get our name out into the community. Reg Buxton suggested that they look at entering the boat parade as well. Mary Ann will add these suggestions to future agendas. Russ Rainey discussed Marco CERT is awaiting the Health Department's approval to implement their "Red Plan" They are looking to write a grant to get a trailer or van to cover the island. Currently, "Code Red" is a phone system that calls 60,000 people in an hour. They will alert a block of people in a particular neighborhood - condos are fine for traditional way. Discussion of Florida being listed as one of six states that has not ordered meds for the pan flu. Per Jim Y.. EMS has ChemPacs and PMRC has medications that are stored in a safe and hidden location. Per Debbie H., American Red Cross got with local sewing groups and sent 840 stockings for the troops in Iraq. Palm Beach County Chapter did only 200, so Collier County did a great job. A $lOk donation was made to ARC for $200 gift cards to active military people who are Collier residents. Target offered to donate $2,000 in extra cards, since these were purchased from them. 40 cards have been given out so far, and are given on a first-come, first-served basis. She was on Fox News this morning to get the information out, and received calls. Debbie will get the information to the Sheriffs Office - Jim Elson is aware of this program as well. The person who donated the SlOk wishes to remain anonymous - ARC is going to see if this person will help fund the veterun's vehick. ^' ~ ,r,; I ,~ >:,j I, g H c"'l ~ 3 Collier County Citizen Corps Advisory Committee December 19,2007 The Sheriff's Office did the Adopt-A-Soldier program and had hoped to serve 500 soldiers - they were able to serve 1,380. They are already being given donations for next year. Lt. Welch attended a tabletop exercise at the Seminole Casino. This included Immokalee Fire and security. There were no County people invited. It was a good exercise. looking at the mutual aid. The tribe takes care of their own. It was a learning experience. Joe Frazier had information on Psychological First Aid training. He took this course and suggested that Citizen Corps groups look into it. Mary Ann will get the date and information to the group. Joe's exercise is moving along. Judy Scribner from Emergency Management will contact the CERT teams for volunteers, Red Cross would like to have their Ministerial Committee work with this drill. This is a great addition for their disaster mental health issues. Next Meeting/Adiourn Next meeting to be held on Wednesday, January 16,2008 at the Board of County Commissioners chambers. Motion to adjourn the meeting at 3:45 p.m. made by Reg Buxton and seconded by Gerry Sugarman. Approved unanimously. Tour of Physicians Regional Medical Center by Joanie Jeannette, COO. followed. Minutes submitted by Mary Ann Cole Approved by Chair: J ~",/ ~7 /tI k;r ./ Reg Buxton // // //// cJ 3" Date 1'6 I A,\4~ November 29,2007 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE ~,_ I/,j} .1.1f1f___ CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD p ~u Naples, Florida " ""'I1I""~-f~k-- November 29, 2007 "e,,,"'''''''' ~~~ I~E REMEMBERED, that the Code Enforcement Board, in f) ':, ':. )ll~: I:;;' and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Community Development and Environmental Services, Room 609/610,2800 Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Sheri Barnett Larry Dean Kenneth Kelly Richard Kraenbring Gerald Lefebvre Lionel L'Esperance (Alternate) George Ponte Charles Martin (Excused Absence) Jerry Morgan ALSO PRESENT: Jean Rawson, Attorney for the Code Enforcement Board Michelle Arnold, Code Enforcement Director Misc. Co<<1lS ICo I ft S Bendisa Marku, Operations Coordinator Date Item II: Page 1 Copies to, ./ ~611A -3 . .. <" November 29,2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Good morning. At this time I'd like to call the Code Enforcement Board of Collier County to order. Notice, the respondent may be limited to 20 minutes per case presentation, unless additional time is granted by the board. Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item will receive up to five minutes unless the time is adjusted by the chairman. All parties participating in the public hearing are asked to observe Robert's Rules of Order and speak one at a time so that the court reporter can record all statements being made. Any person who decides to appeal a decision on this board will need a record of proceedings pertaining thereto and, therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Neither Collier County nor the Code Enforcement Board shall be responsible for providing this record. May I have the roll call. MS. MARKU: Mr. George Ponte? MR. PONTE: Here. MS. MARKU: Mr. Gerald Lefebvre? MR. LEFEBVRE: Here. MS. MARKU: Mr. Larry Dean? MR. DEAN: Here. MS. MARKU: Ms. Sheri Barnett? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Here. MS. MARKU: Mr. Jerry Morgan? MR. MORGAN: Here. MS. MARKU: Mr. Richard Kraenbring? MR. KRAENBRING: Here. MS. MARKU: Mr. Kenneth Kelly? MR. KELLY: Here. MS. MARKU: Mr. Charles Martin has an excused absence. Page 2 16 I A 3 November 29,2007 Mr. Lionel L'Esperance? MR. L'ESPERANCE: Here. MR. YBACET A: Ladies and gentlemen, before we start, may I have your attention. I would like to give you first a little pointer about the microphones that are in front of you. They aren't the same as the ones at the BCC board. They're more directional. So we're going to need for you to talk closer into them, if you don't mind. Thank you very much. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. May we have approval of the agenda. MR. DEAN: Motion to approve. MS. ARNOLD: I've got some changes. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's what I figured. MS. ARNOLD: For the record, Michelle Arnold, Code Enforcement Director. Under Item 4-A, it was noted as a motion for withdrawal. We're changing that to a motion to dismiss without prejudice. Same case. And we have -- we're withdrawing Case No. 4-C-l, that's Board of County Commissioners versus John Farrell. We have a stipulation for 4-C-4, and that will become 4-B-1. We have a stipulation for 4-C-12, and that will become 4-B-2. And we also have a stipulation for 4-C-13, and that will become 4-B-3. Do we have another stipulation just now? We also have a stipulation for 4-C-6. And just because of the order, we're going to be making that 4-B-4. There's also a request to hear 4-C-5 right after 4-B-4, which is same property owner. He's abated that violation, so we're just going to go through that quickly. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: 4-C-5? MS. ARNOLD: 4-C-5 will become I guess 4-C-l. Page 3 ".;,.(.,' ", ',' ' ", """,", ' " j' (. J. 0 :-11-.*' November 29,2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I will give the board just a few minutes to arrange their packet, and then we'll go for an approval. MR. DEAN: Motion to approve the agenda. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. KRAENBRlNG: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Move to the public hearing. There's a motion for a continuance, the Board of Collier County Commissioners versus Glen and Sharon Van Slyke. Oh, I'm sorry, I missed the approval of minutes. I messed up. Let me back up. Go for the approval of minutes on October 25th, which I'll have to abstain, because I was not present. MR. DEAN: Motion to approve the minutes of October 25th. MR. PONTE: Second. MR. KELL Y: We have an approval and a second. All those in favor? MR. KRAENBRlNG: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. MR. MARTIN: Aye. MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Anybody opposed? MR. L'ESPERANCE: I also have to abstain. MR. KELL Y: Motion carries. Page 4 16 IA~ j November 29, 2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Now weill go to the public hearings. I'm sorry. And the first case will be motion for continuance of Board of Collier County Commissioners versus Glen and Sharon VanSlyke. MS. ARNOLD: There's actually a motion prior to that. The motion to dismiss without prejudice. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Oh, I thought you -- okay, we have to approve that. Sorry, people. We'll go back to Board of Collier County Commissioners versus Horseshoe Creek Partners, LTD. Motion to dismiss without prejudice. MS. ARNOLD: That's a motion that the county is presenting to the board. I believe you all have been provided a copy of that. We did hear that case previously, so what we're trying to do at this time is to dismiss the prior case so that there's no -- that can be removed off the property. And then you have a hearing for another case today that's going to be presented for -- that's the issue. So we're needing to remove the prior case. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Entertain a motion? MR. LEFEBVRE: Make a motion to dismiss the case. MR. DEAN: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. KRAENBRING: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Now then, we'll go to motion for continuance. Board of Collier County Commissioners versus Glen and Sharon VanSlyke. Page 5 1#""- 16 ~~-3 November 29,2007 MS. ARNOLD: And that particular request was provided to you. The respondent I don't believe is present, and is requesting a continuance for I think three months. MS. O'FARRELL: Ninety days. MS. ARNOLD: Ninety days. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Looks like she's going to be out of town, according to the paperwork that we received. I'll entertain a motion. MR. PONTE: I'd like to just make an observation. The request that the respondent has made to continue this case for at least three months I think is unreasonable. This case has been around since July of2006. She hasn't suggested a specific date, it's just at least three months. I would say it's okay to continue this to January 24th, but certainly to deny the continuance indefinitely. MS. ARNOLD: And that would be the county's position as well. MR. LEFEBVRE: I second that motion, if it is a motion. MR. PONTE: It's a motion. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. KRAENBRING: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We're going to go ahead and continue until the 24th. The next case is a motion for modification of orders. And it's actually three cases. CEB-2006-16, 2006-17, 2006-18. But before we start, I would like to read something from our rules and regs. And it basically states, a party may motion a rehearing on Page 6 -, r-" .41 ., ..'-J; d; November 29,1007 the board's order based only on grounds that a decision was contrary to evidence of that hearing involving an error or ruling of law which was fundamental to the decision of the board. The written motion for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons thereof. The motion for rehearing shall be written and sent to the secretary of the board within 10 days of the date the order is received by the party but no event more than 20 days from the date of mailing of the order. The order of the board shall be stayed and the time for taking an appeal tolled until motion for rehearing has been disposed of and the decisions received by the parties provided. However, that in no event shall the order be stayed for a period longer than 20 days from the date of the mailing of the rehearing notice or decision. In that case, this isn't necessarily a request for a rehearing. They've never made that request, as I understand. It's a modification of orders, but we can't really do a modification of orders, according to our attorney in this case. And I'm going to turn it over to Jean to explain it, because I spoke to her prior to this meeting. MS. RAWSON: Well, basically there's nothing in our rules and regulations, or actually in the statute that allows you to modify an order. You can have a rehearing, but you have to do it in a timely fashion. And that hasn't happened here. Obviously they can file an appeal within 30 days. That hasn't happened here. So he -- the respondents are back here to ask you for some relief. Maybe a better motion would be an abatement of the fines. You know, you've read his motion to modify and, you know, I certainly want you to hear his legal argument, but you have to be able to make orders within the parameters of our rules, which parrot Chapter 162. Page 7 1"6 , A 3 November 29,2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So in order to proceed, Michelle, I don't think we can hear it as requested. MS. ARNOLD: Well, I would suggest that you hear what the request is and give Mr. White his day in court, so to speak. MS. RAWSON: Yeah, I would, too. Because you can't necessarily go by the title in a motion. You know, let's hear from Mr. White and see what kind of relief he is requesting. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. MR. WHITE: Good morning. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We need to swear you in, please. MR. WHITE: Yes, Madam Chair. I was going to ask that all parties who intend to testify. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. (Speakers were duly sworn.) MR. WHITE: I'd just like to start, Patrick White with the law firm of Porter, Write, Morris & Arthur. I'm here representing Jerry and Kimberlea Blocker on the three matters listed on your agenda under my motion and request. For the record, we did in fact ask for a rehearing timely last May. And regretfully that was not allowed. So what we have is a circumstance where although there is a bit of procedural novelty to what we're looking for, I don't believe it's unprecedented. This board has in fact issued orders nunc pro tunc, one of those lawyer words. And I apologize, you know, I have to bring those things forward. What that basically means is that you go back and you revise an order. Because under the notions of fairness and fundamental equity, you are recognizing that there is some aspect of your prior order that should be modified. And that's why I've stated it as an order to modify that prior order. Now, for many reasons we submitted this well in advance so that we would have all of the board members able to review what those reasons in support of the motion were, so that you could make a test -- Page 8 16 I f~. ~.W4~ November 29,1607 or apply the test, rather, of fundamental fairness, and operating in a way where equity would apply. And I believe there's nothing in your rules of procedure that prohibits you from doing this. We're not asking for a rehearing, we're simply saying that your prior order is one that had cause for revision and modification, because there were aspects of it that are fundamentally unfair. And two ofthem of course are the notion that you've asked us to take an action that seems to be in excess of what's necessary to abate the violation. That being to actually request demolition permits. The other of course being to take an action to rezone the property where, in a timely manner consistent with your order, we went in and spoke with the county staff and they advised us essentially, you can't get there from here. If you want a rezoning, you have to first obtain the comprehensive plan amendment. So we're stuck in a place where unfortunately we would prefer to be able to find some way to abate these violations, but regretfully the county's own processes prevent us from doing so in a timely way. So I have no other means to come to you than to say would you please look at your order on at least those two points and consider under the notion of what's fair and reasonable modifying your order. You still have jurisdiction of this case. You still have the opportunity to essentially, if there is no rule on the subject, to create one. There's nothing -- in fact, therels specific authority for that in your rules and procedures. You can set them. And there's nothing that says that you can't set them as you find them necessary, based upon a particular case. And I submit to you that this case is as factually long in its history, well over 50 years, complex in terms of its procedural history as well, in terms of what rules are supposed to have been applied when, what the effect of your order is going to be on already approved and existing building permits, and the idea that somehow we're just Page 9 i b iA 3 November 29,2007 trying to get to the place where I hope you want us to be and that is to abate this violation in a way that's consistent with the county's rules. So to come full circle, the first part of that motion is to ask to be treated in the same manner as other mobile home parks, nonconforming mobile home parks. To be treated in the same way that the folks who owned this property before my clients did were given a chance, at least under the Notice of Violation that was issued back in 200 I to the Collins. Part of their abatement that was available to them was the site improvement process plan -- excuse me, site improvement plan process, the SIP. So we're asking, have been asking, and hopefully can stop asking here, to be treated fairly and reasonably by simply being able to participate on the site improvement plan process that the rules allow for. And I've provided in your packets the Land Development Code that creates the opportunity for that to take place. But in order to do so, you do have to modify your order. So as a procedural point of fundamental fairness, I think there are at least three very compelling reasons why the motion should be considered, and I believe granted. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I've got a question for you in regards to the consent order that's in our packet. MR. WHITE: Yes, Madam Chair. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It was not -- the one copies that we have were not signed. MR. WHITE: That's correct. They are pursuant to the Department of Environmental Protection attorney's request. Attorney named Karen Bishop. We have until tomorrow to sign those, as do the actual landowners of the junkyard next to us. Both parties, if you will, have till tomorrow to sign. We would love to walk out of here knowing that we're going to be able to abate the violations by way of the site improvement plan process, work with the Department of Environmental Protection and Page 10 t~eL1er 2( 2007 the adjacent property owner to complete the cleanup. I have photographs here showing the substantial level to which that adjacent right-of-way has been cleaned up, the waste tires removed, many junk cars removed, at least out ofthe easterly 40 feet of the 80 feet of the Broward right-of-way. On Tuesday, the Board of County Commissioners also acted to grant us quitclaim deeds for the county's interest in that full 80 feet of right-of-way, plus the other side. That all goes to the owners of the junk yard, the Ratliff trust. The Blockers get the easterly 40 feet of just Broward. The significance of that is that for the first time with those deeds in hand -- and I told you this is a complex case. The deeds themselves are conditioned by the county upon a signing the DEP consent order. So there's a very strong possibility that we're going to sign the consent order tomorrow, because we believe we need to have the ownership of that easterly 40 feet in order to in a meaningful way participate in the site improvement plan process. That 40 feet gives us the distance and area to provide for proper setbacks, to create an appropriate wall or fence, and any buffering and landscaping that may be required. Additionally, the site improvement plan process, as you may know, would allow for the replacement of some of those mobile homes, travel trailers that could benefit from being replaced. So we feel that it is fair and reasonable to ask for that type of relief. Our predecessor in title had that opportunity. I don't understand why five years elapsed before the case was prosecuted, but we are where we are. And welre simply asking to effectively be treated in the way that others have. Now, I understand some ofthe county's objections to that position, but I think we have good evidence and good explanations for every aspect of it. So if you have another question, I'd be happy to answer it. Page 11 16r 11' 3 November 29, 2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I do, but I think Mr. Kelly has one also, so I'll go ahead and let him speak. MR. KELLY: I have more of a comment. I believe if we have the ability to dismiss an order, I think we have the ability to amend one, as we did in the first case yet today. So that's just my position. MS . RAWSON: You do have the ability. And we do issue orders nunc pro tunc when therels been a mistake. Generally speaking, it's a clerical mistake. Maybe I, you know, put 2006 instead of2007. But nevertheless, we have issued orders nunc pro tunc when errors have been made. So I would ask you to listen to what Mr. White has to say, listen to the evidence, listen to what the county has to say and make your decision. MR. KELLY: And I would suggest that Mr. White walk us through step by step and then if we could have county say their position on each one of these. It would help us understand it. MR. WHITE: Well, I appreciate that. Your question, Madam Chair, for follow-up? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'll wait. It may be answered. MR. WHITE: The significant part of the motion, and why I think it appears first, relates to the site improvement plan process. And the county's position has been, and I believe may explain why it wasn't offered before, that they believe that the use is just flat out illegal. The evidence that I provided you in the form of affidavits from former Board of County Commissioners, two of them, as well as a neighbor who has lived at a location literally around the comer since the mid Fifties. Those affidavits stand simply for the idea that this use has been there since the mid Fifties. The difficulty we've had in working this case forward is that we've had to keep going backwards further and further in time to be able to demonstrate either of two things: One, that this use existed and has continued to exist without interruption since the early -- since the Page 12 . , ~ -.At 1~ Nov~mber 29, f<)07 mid Fifties. Before, to the best of our ability, we can even find that there were any county zoning regulations. That has been my challenge. I have said to my client, welre at the point where we need to ask Mr. Peabody for the Wayback Machine, because we keep going back further and further in time. Because the county's position is, you know, once youlre illegal, essentially you're always illegal and therefore you're not nonconforming. Our position is MS. ARNOLD: I object to that. I'd rather speak for the county rather than have Mr. White speak for the county. MR. WHITE: Let me clarify, board members. My understanding of the county's position is that welre illegal. And that is -- in that regard. And that is not something that was stated to us until the past two months. So we had nothing to kind of focus on as to what the objection was until that point in time. We have been working diligently since I was retained to work on this case. Almost daily on finding a way to abate this violation under the law. We believe that the site improvement plan process is one that's available in any zoning district anywhere in the Immokalee urban area. As you may know, the Immokalee master plan and visioning committee is currently looking to revise the Growth Management Plan provisions for the Immokalee master plan. My clients are engaged in that process, along with other family members that have an interest in that community. As you may know, the Blockers own a lot of property in the Immokalee area, so theylre very interested in what happens in that community and what its reputation is throughout the county and the region. So they're actively engaged in that process. And I mention that because it goes back to the point about what do you need to do in order to get the rezoning? In order to get the rezoning that you directed us to do and that we went to the staff and Page 13 16.' A 3 November 29,2007 asked about in a timely manner at a pre-application meeting. They said we're sorry, we can't accept your application for a rezoning because you first need to file for a Growth Management Plan amendment. Now, filing for a Growth Management Plan amendment at the very point in time when the process to amend that master plan is ongoing didnlt seem to indicate that it was a wise expenditure of money on my clientls part to hire someone to file for a small-scale amendment to the tune of some $50,000 just to start that process. As some or all of you may know, that is at a minimum a two-year process. And thereafter, probably 12 months for a rezoning is, I would say, very optimistic. The more typical circumstance, that it's a minimum of 18 months. So the point is as to your order, the time that was originally afforded was not sufficient to achieve the objective that you charged my clients to meet. So we feel that on that ground it makes sense to at least extend the time frame to allow for the Growth Management Plan amendment process to work forward. And we would suggest to you that it makes far more sense to do that as part of the Immokalee master plan visioning process. And to just give you an update on where that is, we appeared -- I appeared, along with Mr. Blocker, in front of that committee in August. And I asked them specifically not about the rights or wrongs of this case but I asked them, is there anything in either the existing master plan or what you're proposing to change in the master plan that would somehow make us ineligible for the site improvement plan process at the comprehensive plan level? And I have a letter back from the chairman, Mr. Thomas, that was directed to the County Commission Chairman, Mr. Coletta, that basically says there isn't anything about what we have or would do in our changes that would preclude you from being able to participate in site improvement plan process. It is a process that's intended to operate Page 14 6r, A ~ November 29, 2crrf7 anywhere and everywhere in the Immokalee urban area. Now, the relevance ofthat is that it creates kind of an umbrella under which the Land Development Code provision that I put into your motion packets actually operates. And again, not looking to speak for the county, but the explanation I believe as to why we may not have been afforded that SIP opportunity under the original Notice of Violation is because if you've read that provision in the portion that I highlighted for you, it indicates that the only way that the window that closed some year plus ago can be reopened is if this board orders it. The reason why that provision is in there is one that I'm very familiar with. I wrote it. I wrote it working with Michelle. And we wrote it for the very simple reason, one, we had to reextend the window for a case that was then ongoing, and we did. But that time has since passed. But we also recognize that there was the possibility -- and I know there are other cases out there where there are nonconforming mobile home parks in the Immokalee urban area that are going to have to come through somehow to have their violations, if you will, addressed. And they're going to need this provision. And you're going to, I believe, have to consider, the same as in this case, whether you're going to apply that provision in a way that allows that way to cure the violation. Effectively to say all those other nonconforming mobile home parks that have been have been in existence for decades and the county finally locates and prosecutes the case, you're going to be afforded the opportunity to consider whether or not site improvement plan process is the appropriate way to abate that violation. The county's position, as I understand it here today, is we didn't originally qualify for that, one because the window was closed, and they weren't thinking that you could or should reopen it because we weren't, quote, nonconforming, unquote. You'll remember back to April of last year there was a significant Page 15 . 6' 1f~.,~ November 2~2007 amount of discussion about what were the prior rules. In fact, we've been cited for violating the 70 regulations that are no longer even law. They've been repealed. Repealed for decades. And yet we're cited for violating under your order a law that no longer exists. Minor point, one not worth mentioning in my motion, but recognizing this is a very complex case. A lot of procedural history, I have to bring it up. Next I think it's important to understand that that time line I was talking about and why it's significant that we have an opportunity for you to understand this use has existed for well over 50 years. This board and some of your members struggled with the idea that there were permits from the Sixties for some of those mobile homes that Mr. Blocker presented to you and that are part of the record. And you struggled with the idea of well, how do we effectively eliminate those. I'd suggest to you that this board doesn't have the authority to revoke a building permit. I think that only the Board of County Commissioners and potentially the building official have that authority. But suffice it to say, that it was something that was something that was of concern to this board. And thatls because you understood the idea of something being grandfathered. This case is one that is the closest to what I would call great-grandfathering, because the history is so long. We've shown you by the way of the affidavits that there is a continuing long history. The thing that's missing -- those are the facts. The thing that's missing is the law. And the other thing I came before this board and asked for last month was an opportunity to have a public records request responded to by the county. It's been a cause of concern, not only for the county but for my client as well. And that's because we previously had a copy of a map that although dated 1952 we couldn't tell you when it was actually effective. We have been through the Clerk of Courts, all of their files and Page 16 16 I A 3 November 29, 2007 microfiche, we've had one of their attorneys in the vault looking for Zoning Book 1, Page 1 that's supposed to exist. We have gone back to the root of zoning regulations in this county, and we cannot find anything that tells us when it began specifically. But the best we can determine is that we believe we predated those existing rules. So -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Are you going to need a whole lot longer? Because there is a 20-minute -- MR. WHITE: Well, I appreciate the opportunity that if! have three cases before you that I might have 20 minutes for each. I apologize for making that request. I know there's a lot of folks here who would like to be heard as well. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Well, we have a pretty big docket today -- MR. WHITE: I understand. I understand, Madam Chair. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- so if you can make it as expedient as possible, we would appreciate it. MR. WHITE: My point to you is that as far as grandfathering and nonconforming go, we believe that we have demonstrated by what we have provided you and what we additionally can provide if you care to see it, is that this property has been -- has either existed as a use before there were any county rules, which is more the case, or even if you accept the alternative, the last -- the next best set of rules we have are from 1959. And we believe that under the zoning district we think this property was then designated as, which is Commercial 3, our use was permitted under those rules. So the point at which we became nonconforming wasn't until the early Seventies when the county changed the zoning district to industrial. So what you have here is a case where effectively the county has sat on its heels for well over 35 years. They attempted to prosecute the case in 200 1. In 2001 they recognized that SIP was an appropriate way to handle this case and to abate it. Page 17 16 I A" 3 ~ . ' November 29, 2007 And I submit to you that if the county had gone forward at that time with the prosecution, my client wouldn't be here today. The site improvement plan process would have been followed, there would have been no violation, and we all would have been moving on to the next case. So what I'm asking you to do is to recognize that there's law that allows you to amend your order in this fashion. If for some reason you don't think that that's fair and best in this case, then the alternative I put before you is at the minimum you should add two more years to the time frame we have just to get us back to the place where we might get a comprehensive plan amendment or work through the Immokalee master plan visioning process, as we presently are attempting to do, in order to be able to get the right kind of land use designation for this property. And at a minimum, I fail to understand why it is at all necessary to have to apply for demolition permits for the structures that are on that property. Every other use case that I've seen, and I've prosecuted a bunch of cases in my career, simply ceasing that use is sufficient to abate the violation. Why, can anyone explain to me, my client has to go and destroy his buildings and his trailers in order to come into compliance with the law. Something seems fundamentally unfair about that. And I ask you to well consider the motion. Ifthere are any questions, I'm happy to address them. There's certainly more I can bring to your consideration of this, but I understand that time is limited. And I thank you for bearing with us thus far in listening to what I have to share with you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, at this time I'll turn it over to Michelle. MR. WHITE: Are there any questions? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I think we'll come back to questions at the end so that we can hear both sides and then question. MS. ARNOLD: I would agree with Mr. White that you all have Page 18 161 'J 3 November 29, 2007 the ability to amend your order. I would just caution the board to look really at what he's asking you to do in his request. Because this matter was heard by the board in April of 2006, and yes, Mr. White pursued the first part of the order to request a pre-application meeting, and did hold a pre-application. So he met that portion of it. And he was advised at that preap. that he needed to go through a plan amendment to get the rezone, but failed to pursue that plan amendment and failed to request an amendment of your order at that time when he was advised by staff that that was a route that would remedy the violation. Instead of coming back to the board at that time, there was an appeal, in a sense, not the normal appeal that would have gone to the civil court, but another appeal that went to a special magistrate process. And much of the things that he discussed with you today was discussed at that special magistrate process, and the special magistrate MR. WHITE: Madam Chairman? MS. ARNOLD: Can I have my opportunity, Patrick? MR. WHITE: No, ma'am, I don't believe you can. I just -- let me make my point of my objection. MR. DEAN: Excuse me. No, sir. MR. WHITE: I donlt get to tell you why I object? I object -- I didn't say anything before, Madam Chair, because she was talking about the procedure of that statutory process. When she wants -- when Ms. Arnold wants to speak about the substance of it, I have to tell you that I have to object because it's a matter thatls presently under litigation, okay? We had to file an appeal, if you will, of that appeal based upon the way that the Board of County Commissioners considered that. So I don't want to inject into this proceeding whatever the substance of that discussion was. And I'm not trying to hide the facts, I'm simply saying it's a matter that's under litigation, and I don't know Page 19 l~'J A 3 November 29,2007 what relevance it has to you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Hold on. Jean, I'm going to ask for guidance. MS. RAWSON: He's made his objection for the record. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We can still hear what Michelle has to say, correct, with that objection in mind? MS. RAWSON: Yes, you can. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, go ahead, Michelle. MR. WHITE: I'm assuming that my objection's denied. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Your objection is noted. MS. RAWSON: I'm not ruling one way or another on his objection, obviously that's not my role. I'm just telling you, if you note his objection for the record then you can make a decision to go ahead and hear what Ms. Arnold has to say. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Well, go ahead-- MR. WHITE: But the point is you're going to have heard what it is she has to say that I believe may prejudice -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: But we also know that you've appealed it, so we do know that there's got to be legal reasons for that appeal. MR. WHITE: Understood. Thank you, Madam Chair. MS. ARNOLD: As I was saying, much of the arguments that were made during that special magistrate process were similar to what was mentioned to you today. The special magistrate upheld your decision that there was a violation, there is a violation, and -- MR. WHITE: Madam Chair, I have to again object. Ms. Arnold I understand is probably explaining to you what she believes the effect of that magistrate's report was -- MS. ARNOLD: I'm just explaining in my opinion -- MR. WHITE: It had nothing to do -- MS. ARNOLD: -- just like you did note the county's opinion. MR. WHITE: It had nothing to do with the Code Enforcement Board Page 20 16 / A3 November 29,2007 order that you entered. It simply was a discussion about those elements of the statute. And they don't authorize the special master to make a determine about what you all did. That is still something that we at the end of that process -- and Ms. Rawson had indicated to you that we had not yet appealed. We don't get a right to appeal your April order of '06 until after the conclusion of the litigation involving the special magistrate. So we don't know what that court may someday do when we file our appeal. But we haven't yet. What I'm trying to do today is to avoid having to go through all of that process. So I appreciate what Ms. Arnold is saying, but the magistrate was not able to comment about your order in the manner -- in the way that she's characterizing it. Sorry. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Go ahead, Michelle. MS. ARNOLD: So the special magistrate order has nothing to do with your order, but yet he can appeal your order after the termination of what the special magistrate did. Okay. I just wanted to note that although the special magistrate in Mr. White's opinion did not uphold your order, those were all things that were presented through that process. The argument that he made was presented through that process. It's the county's position that although something did exist in the Fifties, what exists today and what was brought to you in August of -- or April of 2006 is not what existed back in the Fifties. It is progressively increased. And we have a residential use in an industrial zoned property. I was a major part of the development of the site improvement plan process when it was developed back in the county in the -- I can't even remember how long ago that was. And it was not contemplated at that time or any time to apply to uses that are not authorized by the zoning district. Page 21 q A 3 j; 6 I November 29,2007 Thatls what we have here in this case. We have a residential use in the industrial zoning district. The site improvement plan process can be used anywhere throughout the Immokalee area is absolutely correct. But the zoning always is looked at to determine whether or not that use is authorized in that zoning district before we apply it. There was a Notice of Violation served to the prior property owners. It was served in error. That is the reason why it was not pursued or prosecuted before this board. Again, I want to caution you all to look at what he's asking you all to do with the amendment of your order. Essentially he's asking you to allow something that staffhas, and the zoning department has determined that is not authorized. The site improvement plan is allowed but not in an industrial zoning land for residential purposes. MR. WHITE: May I respond? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Basically, Michelle, what you're saying is even ifhe were to apply for a site improvement plan, it probably would not be granted because of the zoning? MS. ARNOLD: Absolutely. MR. WHITE: May I respond? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes. MR. WHITE: There are a number of points that I think need to be made clear for the record, and I hope you'll indulge me. First among them is that as to the prior NOV, if the reason why the county didn't pursue it is because it was in error, as to the idea of the SIP, why didn't they process it as to the legality of the use? But let's step past that. Let's look at the NOV in this case. The NOV in this case does not cite my client in anyone of those three cases for some kind of an expansion of a nonconforming use. It's not in there. Itls not cited. So if the countyls position today is that somehow welve done that impermissibly, that isn't part of this case. Page 22 16/}~ 3 November 29,2007 And that's not just some fine legal point of law, it is the fundamental thrust of what we're saying to you is unfair about this process. And as to the magistratels proceeding, the facts that were then being discussed are different than the facts that further research by using the Wayback Machine have uncovered. And in fact we were unaware of some of the things at that time. Our challenge -- my challenge has been that every time we come up with something that we think is a way to be treated fairly and reasonably, the county throws down another barrier. And I understand, their job is to gain compliance of the law. We're saying to you that we believe we qualify under that provision. You've got the words in front of you. In the LDC it talked about the Immokalee nonconforming mobile home overlay district. That district is the entirety of the urban area. It doesn't say anything at all in there that you have to be in a zoning district where the use is permitted. If that were the case, logically you wouldnlt need the provision. You'd be lawful. You wouldn't be nonconforming. But let me tell you about a case that's presently being considered by the county for SIP. It's a case that in fact -- MS. ARNOLD: I object. Has nothing to do -- we're talking about the Blocker case. And the relevance or the facts of this other case, and I don't even know what it is, is no relevance on this one. We're dealing with this matter right now. And I just want to correct the record with regard to bringing up something new. Mr. White is the one that brought up the Wayback theory, and I just wanted to clarify that that wasn't -- we brought this case to the board for illegal land use, and that's what we brought to you all. And I wasn't introducing any further violations by insinuating that this was something that had grown through the years, I guess, as implied by Mr. White. The fact remains, we brought the case for what -- for those Page 23 1 {:';'l A November 29, 2J violations noted. He did bring up there are older provisions that have been since repealed. Those were merely showing a historical -- the historical nature that he's arguing that that particular residential use had never been authorized, with the exception of a single caretaker's quarters. And what we were dealing with is multiple units in an industrial area. MR. WHITE: My point is that the prior regulations that we did discover I think stood for the proposition. At the time we didn't know what the district was. Everybody assumed it was industrial. What we subsequent to the magistrate process discovered by this intensive research that I would submit may be something that the county should have done beforehand, but in any event we've now done at great expense and time, demonstrates that under the preexisting rules before 1970, this is a permissible use in the industrial district. We don't believe it was industrial. We think just like the junkyard next door, it was then commercial C-3. And under those rules, it was a permissible use. So the point is either we -- and we think we preexisted even those earliest rules that we can find. So the notion is that at some point we were either preexisting, and when the rules changed and the industrial district was created in '72, I believe, we became nonconforming. If we're nonconforming, we're not illegal. And we qualify under those rules. And I will tell you for the record and correct Ms. Arnold, that there has been no determination made by zoning about this issue. In fact, one of the reasons I said to this board last month I needed time till this month was to get that public requests record answered. I went down, my paralegal did, and attempted to find the very map that we had found before. It doesn't exist in the county's files today. Maybe they couldn't find it, I don't know. But the reason I asked for it is because as part of our analysis to try to determine what Page 24 :'G ( ~;,'~, ~. November 29, 2007 was the effective date of that map, because it had a 1952 date on it but it didn't say something like adopted in 1952. The plat that predated that says yes, accepted as to the road right-of-way. These zoning-- this map doesn't have anything like it on it. So we went through and for every platted subdivision that was on there, every feature that was identified, a school, the farmer's market, we went back to the best of our ability to determine when those things came into existence. So my map, the only copy I had, has scribbles all over it of our notes. So in order to come to you with a clean document, we went to the county and asked for those records. They no longer exist. No one can find any ordinances earlier than the ones in the early Seventies that actually adopted the zoning regulations that apply to these lands. But to the best of our ability to determine, we're nonconforming. And you have the authority to allow us to go forward. But you have to amend your order. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Kelly, do you have a question? MR. KELLY: Thank you, Mr. White. I'm glad that you brought up the original notice of violation and subsequently our order, because if I remember correctly the biggest issue that I had in my mind was a safety issue, health and safety issue. And although I'm not completely adverse to granting an extension of time in order for you to pursue the process, I would really like to know that there has been considerable effort to make sure that the residents, especially children, were at least safe in that community until somebody determines whether that is industrial or commercial or allowed or not, improved, otherwise, that contradicts our order. MR. LIESPERANCE: Madam Chair, also if! could piggyback your comments. This seems to be turning into a rehearing. Did we intend that to happen this morning? Page 25 I 6" A 3 November 29, 2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: No, we did not. And I would like to try to ask everybody to keep that in mind, that we do not want to rehear the case. We're trying to listen to your request and give both parties the ability to express their side. Do I have anybody else -- MS. ARNOLD: Can I just make a suggestion? Because this does seem like it may not be ending any time soon. We do have a few stipulations. Maybe we can go through those stipulations quickly and then come back to this? MR. WHITE: I have no objection to that, Madam Chair. And in fact, as to the idea that we may need to stipulate to something else, we would stipulate to the fact that we violate today's zoning district. Thatls not a problem. We understand we're a residential use. And the other thing is, we would stipulate to a violation of the nonconforming provision, if that's required to amend your order, which I believe it is. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: At this time frame I think -- MR. WHITE: I have photos for Mr. Kelly or others who may choose to see them. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm going to table this until we get through the stipulations, because I think itls unfair to the people in the audience that are waiting. Because I think this is going to be lengthy. MR. WHITE: I'm more than willing to do so, Madam Chair. And I appreciate it. And if there had been an original desire on the part of the county for us to hear this, along with our order imposing fines, we would have probably been agreeable, try to wrap it up all at once. MS. ARNOLD: I don't think that request was ever made to me, so __ if that request was made to me, I would have forwarded that to you all. MR. KELL Y: I make a motion we table this. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor?g Page 26 .,;:r: 77 ,6 ,.1 ~.~ ~ A 3 November 29, 2007 MR. KRAENBRING: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Opposed? MR. DEAN: I oppose. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. MS. ARNOLD: Okay, we do have one other stipulation that came in after we approved the agenda. That was item 4-C- 3. And so the first one would be, that you're going to consider, is Craft, James Craft. Board of County Commissioners versus James Craft. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Where do you want the 106, the three to go in, at the end? MS. ARNOLD: That would go in at the end. (Speakers were duly sworn.) MS. O'FARRELL: For the record, Susan O'Farrell, Collier County Code Investigator, Environmental Specialist. This would be CEB Case No. 2007-107, and Department Case No. 2006060535. Mr. Craft owns a property out on the East Trail heading down into the Everglades, and what I observed on it was mounds of vegetative construction litter and a large amount of debris. Weare here today to present a stipulation. Mr. Craft has agreed to the violations that existed under Ordinance 05-44, the weed, litter and exotics control ordinance, sections six through eight, and are described as property with mounds of vegetative, miscellaneous and construction litter. Therefore, we have agreed that Mr. Craft will pay the operational costs in the amount of$600,81 within 30 days of this hearing, incurred in the prosecution of this case. He will abate all violations by: Removing all litter on the property as defined by the Collier County Ordinance 05-44, Section 6 Page 27 fI~.3 November 29,2007 through 8, within 30 days ofthis hearing or a daily penalty of$100 per day will be assessed as long as the violation persists. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Does he have to notify you? MS. O'FARRELL: I'm not finished. I was trying to let her catch up a little bit. The vegetative debris occurring from the property due to storm damage, which would have been Hurricane Wilma, he is being allowed to dispose of in an uncovered, excavated three -- no deeper than three-foot pit on the property. This is something that I had checked out with the engineers from our engineering department, and this is allowable as long as it's an uncovered pit. The construction debris will be removed from the property and the vegetative debris that has been dumped on the property by opportunitistic cleanup people after Storm Wilma will be removed from the property to an approved landfill facility, and Mr. Craft will notify me when all of these have been abated. I would like to add that Mr. Craft has been working diligently for the last month removing debris from the property. He has graded out areas where there were large amounts of mulch and topsoil, so the property is becoming more appropriate to what it should look like. He has worked very hard since he started. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Craft? MR. CRAFT: Yes, ma'am. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do you agree with the stipulated agreement? MR. CRAFT: Yes, ma'am, I do. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Kelly, do you have a question? MR. KELLY: So it was illegal dumping that caused this? MR. CRAFT: Yes, it was. During Hurricane Wilma I was out of town for about 30 days. When I come back, they had used my Page 28 161 A ~ November 29, 2tl'07 property to dump trees and debris and stuff there. MR. KELLY: Is 30 days going to be sufficient for you? MR. CRAFT: It is going to be, because I'm going to make it. With Christmas and New Yearls -- I'm hauling to a separate company, and as long as they donlt close down on me, we're fine. And they said as long as they get plenty of work, they're working through that. So yes, 30 days will be enough. Ifnot, I have to come back and can ask. But I really believe that I will work whatever I can. I've got a full crew down there working. We've been working there for a month now, and we believe that we will have it cleaned up. MS. O'FARRELL: Could I just add one thing, Mr. Chairman? It's not all illegal dumping. There was -- a certain amount of it was illegally dumped, but there was some storm debris from his own property that he had piled up in into piles and there was some construction debris I think from other projects maybe that he was working on. MR. CRAFT: Yeah. And that part had been cleaned up a year ago, the construction debris -- MS, O'FARRELL: And I placed a stop work order on his property and that was when he started cleaning up, MR. CRAFT: Right, we cleaned all that up. But the debris that was cleaned from Hurricane Wilma, we went through and picked up all the trees, piled it in a pile, and according to county ordinance welre not allowed to pile it on top of the ground, we have to dig a three-foot hole and put it in the ground. So it wasn't that we -- all the property's in piles, and actually one major pile. So we just didnlt dig the hole is what the problem was. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Richard? MR. KRAENBRING: I just wanted to make sure 30 days was good. Otherwise, the holidays are coming up, the gentleman has been working diligently, and it may be better just to give him 60 days. MS. OIFARRELL: Well, I was on-site yesterday and I believe Page 29 ] 6 , j~ ~ '-,~ O:(I;i: November 29, 2007 he's about 60 percent completed, so I think 30 days would be plenty. MR. CRAFT: Can I put a stipulation in? Ifwe have a problem, we can come back and talk? I will -- I believe I will have it cleaned up in 30 days. MS. O'FARRELL: I explained to Mr. Craft that ifthere is an imposition of fines hearing and he had gone over because of the holidays that I would testify that we give him some relief on those fines. I just don't want the case to go any farther than it already has. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Anybody else have any questions? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, 1'11 close the public hearing on that and -- MR. LEFEBVRE: I make a motion to accept the stipulation. MR. KELLY: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have a motion and a second. MR. PONTE: 1'11 second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. KRAENBRING: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. MR. CRAFT: Thank you very much, appreciate it. MS. OIF ARRELL: Thank you, Mr. Craft. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Michelle, ifI'm in the correct order, is the next case 2007-1177 MS. ARNOLD: Correct. Page 30 r6/A 3 November 29, 2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Stipulated agreement for Raymon Cabrera and Rosa -- MS. ARNOLD: No, that would be Tollgate Commercial Center. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I messed up, sorry. I read the right number but pulled the wrong case. Tollgate Commercial, James Nici, registered agent. MS. O'FARRELL: James Nici is being represented by Mr. Neil Dorrill. (Speakers were duly sworn.) MS. O'FARRELL: For the record, Susan O'Farrell, Collier County Code Investigator, Environmental Specialist. This would be CEB Case No. 2007-117, Department Case No. 2005050579. The Tollgate property has quite extensive preserve area and over the years had not been maintained on a regular base and had become infested with exotics. And we have been working over the last two -- three years now in getting this property cleaned up. Some of the problems that we have had have been the turnover from the developer to the condominium association. I began preparing the case for CEB because I was frustrated by the lack of response. However, when Mr, Dorrill and I began communicating with each other, immediately action began to be taken. They are probably 90 percent in compliance right now with the exotic vegetation being removed. The wetlands are being cared for. I was on the site day before yesterday with Mr. Dorrill who has been very good about meeting me on-site and ruining shoes and walking in mud to get this thing taken care of. They have had a boundary survey done for the border along 1-75, which shows that they do have little more exotic removal to be taken care of. In this case we are presenting a stipulation where Neil Dorrill is representing the Tollgate Commercial Center. The violation is that of Sections 3.05,07(A-D) and (H) of the Collier County Land Page 31 161 ~ November 29,2007 Development Code Ordinance 04-41, and are described as preserve on property contains a wide variety of plant species including but not limited to Brazilian Pepper, Air Potato, Melaleuca, Earleaf Acacia and Java Plum. Right now all that we have on the property is the Brazilian Pepper, because they've been working towards compliance. The Tollgate Commercial Center has agreed to pay the operational costs in the amount of689.02 within 30 days of this hearing incurred in the prosecution of this case. They are going to abate all violations by: Remove all exotics from the preserve area following the standards set forth in 3.05.07(H)(g)(ii) within six months of this hearing or a daily penalty of $100 will be imposed as long as the violation persists. The removal of the exotics shall follow the above mentioned standards, with special attention paid to the following phrase: All exotic vegetation within the first 75 feet of the outer edge ofthe preserve will be physically removed. Any exotic tree that is removed must be cut down to grade and the stump treated. Exotic vegetation within the interior of the preserve beyond 75 feet from the outer edge area can be treated in place if it is determined that the physical removal will not -- cause more damage to the native vegetation in the preserve area. I said "not" by accident, so I want to make sure that it's "will" cause. Where prohibited, exotic vegetation is removed, but the stump remains. The stump must be treated with United States Environmental Protection Agency approved herbicide mixed with a visual tracer dye. Control of exotics will be conducted on a yearly basis or more frequently when required. They will obtain any necessary Collier County or state permits for the removal of vegetation. That would be because there are some wetlands on the property, if in the future they need to remove exotics from that area. Mr. Dorrill has agreed to this and I'm presenting it to you today. Page 32 l~f A November J, 2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Does he have to notify you when all the -- MS. O'FARRELL: Yes. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- exotics have been removed? MS. O'FARRELL: Yes, Mr. Dorrill will notify me when the exotics have been removed. I would like to make some comments, and that is that I gave them 60 __ six months to do this small amount, because Mr. Dorrill is faced with a new budget year, and I think he's run up to a wall in terms of money in order to finish the project. So I'd like to give him time to get a new budget approved by his board in order to have money to continue. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Dorrill, do you have -- do you agree to the stipulations? MR. DORRlLL: (Witness nods head affirmatively.) MR. LEFEBVRE: Just a -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any comments? MR. LEFEBVRE: -- comment? Yes. In the order it states that it will be hand removal, and I didn't -- MS. O'FARRELL: It's hand removal for the first 75 feet, but most -- it's already all been done in that area. MR. DORRlLL: Our contractor has done all hand removal thus far. Itls quite a good wetland area, and most of it is a created wetland. But the work that has been done there, and the cypress trees that have been planted there are actually thriving at the moment, in spite of the drought conditions. And so we have a very good licensed contractor who has been doing this work. It has been constrained by the fact that it is adjacent to 1-75 right-of-way that is entirely infested with Brazilian Peppers. And many of the pepper trees are growing over. But all ofthe work thus farrhas been hand work, not mechanical work. Page 33 16 1 -If' ~~\ .p'~ November 29,2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions, comments? MR. PONTE: I'm just a little concerned about -- you say six months? MS. O'FARRELL: I'm trying to work with Mr. Dorrill in terms of his budget and the process that he has to go through in order to get more money to finish the job. I'm worried that if we only give him 30 days to finish, he's not going to have the budget in time, and then he's going to start incurring fees. So because he's worked so diligently with me on this, I'm trying to make it possible for us to finish this case with a positive closure, rather than making it more difficult. MR. PONTE: When will the new budget be approved? MR. DORRILL: The new budget will be January. If! can back up maybe just 30 seconds. This case is a situation where a developer did not comply with his permit conditions or the original development order. In the interim period of time, where this case began, he turned the association over quickly to the property owners. The community has been -- it's all commercial property -- has been completely sold, and the owners of the property now run this commercial condominium association. They inherited this problem from a developer who shirked his responsibility under the original Notice of Violation. But I will tell you this: For these group of commercial property owners, it's been a very difficult fiscal year. Three of the largest property owners have not paid any of their assessments this year and are now facing liens and possible foreclosures as a result of not paying their assessments. So I only have about half of the remaining property owners who are paying quarterly into the association. I think your staff has realized, since our firm was hired by the property owners and with absolutely no money we have actually exceeded the original time frames that we were given to do the removal in phases. Page 34 16' A 3 November 29,2007 But at this point I'm out of money. And if necessary, our firm will pay these costs on behalf of this not-for-profit property owners association in order to comply until I can get access to new funds in the first quarter ofthe new fiscal year that starts on January the 1st. MR. PONTE: Thank you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions or comments? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: If not, I'll close the public hearing and look for a motion. MR. LEFEBVRE: I make a motion to accept the stipulation. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear a second? MR. KRAENBRING: I'll second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. KRAENBRING: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. Good luck. MR. DORRILL: For those of us who have entered into and are trying to work with the county, I want to thank you for tabling that prior motion, for those of us who are attempting to work in good faith with your staff and this board. MS. OIF ARRELL: Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Dorri11. MS. ARNOLD: Madam Chairman, the next item would be 2007-118, Naples South Realty Association. (Speakers were duly sworn.) Page 35 ',.>'1.: . .~ 161 ~Y1"Y: '.c' November 29, 2007 MS. O'FARRELL: For the record, Susan O'Farrell, Collier County Code Investigator, Environmental Specialist. This is CEB Case No. 2007-118, Department Case No. 2003120279. It is a violation of Collier County Land Development Code Ordinance 04-41, as amended. Sections 4.06.05(J)(l) and (2), maintenance of required landscape. The description ofthe violation is that the required landscape has fallen below the standards of the site development plan. The Naples South Plaza, which is located on 41, has been a case that I've worked on and several other investigators have worked on prior to me since 2003. For some reason we have been just stymied by being able to keep trees alive in the islands in this parking lot. As of yesterday I drove over there and the trees have all been installed due to the hard work and again diligence of Mr. Havens here who's representing Richard Baer, who is the registered agent for the LLC. The irrigation has been replaced. They've had trees replaced three or four times in the last six months. We've had vandals come in and turn off irrigation, we've had people come in and screw down the lids on the bubblers. It's just been one ofthose cases that we'd just like to die. So __ and I know Mr. Havens feels the same way. MR. HA YENS: Three-hour drive from Palm Beach, absolutely. MS. OfF ARRELL: SO we have come to a stipulation agreement. Mr. Havens is here on behalf of Richard Baer and Naples South Realty . He has agreed that the violations were as stated. He has agreed that the violation are Sections 4.06.05(J)(2) of the Collier County Land Development Code Ordinance 04-41, as amended, and are described as required landscape has not been properly maintained and Page 36 16(') November 29, 2007 has fallen below Collier County approved site development plan standards. They have agreed to pay the operational costs in the amount of $1,235.62 within 30 days of this hearing that were incurred in the prosecution of this case, and to abate all violations by restoring the required landscape of the property to the standards set by the Collier County approved site development plan, SDPI 2006 AR 8135, to include the replacement of dead and dying required plant material in the property buffers and landscaped areas and fully operational irrigation within 30 days of this hearing or a daily penalty of $100 per day will be imposed as long as violation exists. And that the -- Mr. Havens will notify me with the violation has been abated. Sorry, I keep forgetting that one. I would like to say that all the trees are now in place, they've all been staked as I have requested, the irrigation is all in place, and I have fervent hope in my heart that it will stay that way for a long time. I know that Mr. Havens knows that I will be watching the property, because I have explained to him that with this adjudication the next step would be to go straight to the Code Enforcement Board for another hearing if I happen to drive by and 10 out of the 20 trees are dead. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Hopefully we can find the vandals too in the process. MS. OIF ARRELL: Yes, that would be nice. That's been very difficult. MR. HAVENS: Send me a photo of it or something. MS. O'FARRELL: I would also like to say that since Mr. Havens took over this property, he has been easy to work with, he's been available by cell phone, always answered my phone calls. He has been there bye-mail, hels kept on top of his landscaper. And I think at one point even told his landscaper he was going to fire him if he didn't get his act together and start making these trees look right. So I would like Page 37 16-1 A 3 November 29,2007 to say thank you to Mr. Havens for working hard on this job. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Havens, do you agree with the stipulations that have been -- MR. HAVENS: Yes, ma'am, I do. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do we have any comments? MR. LEFEBVRE: Just one comment or question. I just want to make sure that you state for the record that you do have the authority MR. HA YENS: I'm sorry? MR. LEFEBVRE: -- to represent-- MR. HAVENS: Yes. Yes, I do. MS. O'FARRELL: The stipulation is actually signed by Mr. Baer. So he's here representing Mr. Baer, but the appropriate, you know, final I guess responsibility has been signed by him. MR. LEFEBVRE: Okay, thank you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions or comments? MR. PONTE: Just one. Has the Sheriffs Department been notified of this repeated vandalism? MS. OIF ARRELL: That would be something you'd have to ask Mr. Havens. MR. PONTE: I'm curious about that, because you're stipulating to clear up the problem within 30 days, but the vandalism could return in 35 days. Maybe extra patrol or something needs -- the property just needs extra attention. MR. HAVENS: Well, we have notified them. And we actually-- one of the programs I'm putting in place -- I'm relatively new with the company, actually since February. We have vacant space at the plaza, and I'm working with Collier County Sheriff right now to set up a substation. And I think it's not necessarily our plaza but it's the entire area. So right now I'm looking a way to donate the space for their use. Page 38 16 JA 3 November 29,2007 MR. PONTE: Terrific. Thank you. MS. O'FARRELL: And I was out there this week, two days prior, in order to have something to tell you at the hearing today, and there were two policemen in the back having lunch or something. You know, they sit in their cars. So there were policemen on property. MR. PONTE: Thank you. MS. O'FARRELL: You're welcome. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions or comments? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: If not, I'll close the public hearing, ask for a motion. MR. LEFEBVRE: Make -- MR. PONTE: I make a motion to accept the county's stipulation as read. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. KRAENBRING: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. MS. OIF ARRELL: Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Havens. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is he next one 2007-111? MS. ARNOLD: Yes. Raymon Cabrera. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes. Raymon Cabrera and Rosa Pittaluga. Page 39 :. 6"" I~' ,~ 0 November 29,2007 MS. ARNOLD: Actually, we would ask that we remove Ms. Rosa's names off both of those cases, because we've since found that she's not responsible for -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. (Speakers were duly sworn.) MR. SNOW: For the record, Investigator Kitchell Snow. We have entered into a stipulation in this case. We have agreed that there is a violation of Sections 5.06.05(M) of 04-41, the Land Development Code. Specifically window occlusion exceeding the allowable 25 percent. We have agreed to remove any window occlusion in excess of the allowable 25 percent within 14 days of the date of this hearing or a fine of $150 a day will be imposed until such time as excess occlusion is removed; and to cease displaying any signs in accordance (sic) to and compliant with 04-41, the Land Development Code of Unincorporated Collier County; and to notify the code enforcement investigator when the violation has been abated. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Cabrera, do you agree to the stipulated agreement? MR. CABRERA: Yes. MR. SNOW: Oh, did we say operational costs? I'm sorry. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes, I'm sorry. MR. LEFEBVRE: What case are we hearing? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: 2007-111. MR. DEAN: 111. MR. KELLY: That's a whole different issue. MR. LEFEBVRE: That's regarding the facade and 10 percent painting, not the -- MR. SNOW: That's the occlusion? I'm sorry, there's probably -- therels two cases, so that's probably going to have to be 111 and not 110, for the record. MR. LEFEBVRE: The 111, ifl'm looking at this correctly, is a Page 40 16 f \, t~f HJ< November 29;2007 facade with more than 10 percent painted a primary second color or -- MR. SNOW: Correct. Itls going to have to be 1 -- III is the facade painting? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes. MR. LEFEBVRE: Yes, MR. SNOW: Then it's going to have to be 110. MR. LEFEBVRE: It's being stipulated-- MR. SNOW: To 110, correct. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So we pulled the wrong case. MR. SNOW: No, in the stipulation I probably wrote the incorrect case number. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So we need to be doing 2010? MR. SNOW: Yes, ma'am, 2010. MS. ARNOLD: We need to change the stipulation. MR. LEFEBVRE: Does the stipulation have 110 on there instead of 111 ? MS. ARNOLD: Yeah, it needs to be changed and initialed by the property owner as well. MR. SNOW: Weill redo that, sir. MR. LEFEBVRE: Thank you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And he did not stipulate to the other one, then, correct? MR. KELLY: Correct. MR. SNOW: No, actually we're going to hear the other case as well. That violation's been abated. All we're asking for is operational costs on that one. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Good enough. Just so that we get it right. Okay. MR. DEAN: The operational costs? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The operational costs are? MS. ARNOLD: The operational costs -- we've got to check to see if it's the correct cost, since the wrong number was given. Page 41 . f, ~, A.. '., ~. . .-, I H~,., . \d; , November 29,2007 MR. SNOW: I have it. 111 is 295.37.295.37. MS. ARNOLD: Let's not confuse it. The stipulation that youlre considering, the operational cost is 283.14, okay? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Do you want to go back through it just so that we have everything? MR. SNOW: Yes, ma'am. Are we clear? It's 2007-110. 2007-110 is the case for the stipulation. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And the operational costs are $283.14? MR. SNOW: Yes, ma'am. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Does everybody understand? You've got that? MR. PONTE: Yes. MR. DEAN: Yes. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, public hearing closed. May I entertain a motion? MR. LEFEBVRE: I make a motion to accept the county's and respondentls stipulation. MR. DEAN: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. KRAENBRlNG: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. MS. ARNOLD: We had the request to hear the other case at this time as well, so if we can -- while the respondentls here, hear case now 2007-11. Page 42 ....11 r - ~ ~ November 29,2007 MR. SNOW: Real quick, Madam Chair? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Urn-hum. MR. SNOW: This is a violation of the Land Development Code. We request a finding of fact. 05-05-08 C-- MS. RAWSON: Both of you need to be sworn again. (Speakers were duly sworn.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And actually Bendisa needs to talk before Kitchell, so slow down. MS. MARKU: For the record, Bendisa Marku, Operations Coordinator, Collier County Code Enforcement. The respondent is present and this is in reference to Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2007-111, Department Case No. 2007081071. !tIS Collier County Board of County Commissioners verses Raymon Cabrera. And for the record, we would also like to remove Rosa M. Pittaluga, due to her not being the business owner. The respondent and the board received a package of evidence and I would like to enter the packet of evidence as Exhibit A. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I have a motion to accept packet A? MR. LEFEBVRE: Motion to accept. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in -- do I have a second? MR. KRAENBRING: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. KRAENBRING: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed? Page 43 . 16/.rc :> November 29,2007 (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. MS. MARKU: Violation of Ordinances 04-41, Collier County Land Development Code, as amended, Sections 5.05.08(C)(13)(b). THE COURT REPORTER: Excuse me, Bendisa, I will swear in the interpreter at this time. Mr. Ybaceta? (Interpreter was duly sworn.) MS. MARKU: Description of violation: A facade with more than 10 percent painted a primary, secondary or florescent. Location/address where violation exists: 203 West Main Street, Immoka1ee. Folio No. 33580560003. Name and address of owner/person in charge of violation location: Raymon Cabrera, 4862 Weymouth Street, Lake Worth, Florida, 33463. Date violation first observed: August 28th, 2007. Date owner/person in charge given Notice of Violation: September 11 th, 2007. Date on/by which violation to be corrected: September 27th, 2007. Date of reinspection: September 28th, 2007. Results of reinspection: A violation remains. Has it been abated? MR. SNOW: It has been abated. MS. MARKU: As oftoday, the violation has been abated. At this time I would like to turn the case over to Investigator Kitchell Snow. MR. SNOW: Good morning. For the record, Investigator Kitchell Snow. I would like it be known for the record that Marlene Serrano interpreted on the previous stipulation, that she did explain to him in Spanish. I felt that was appropriate. Mr. Cabrera does speak English, but just so he may be more comfortable in speaking Spanish. Page 44 ],6~'~ 3 November 29,2007 Just for the record, they have abated this. He's worked very diligently since I've talked to him to try to do this. The property looks a lot better. They still have some things they need to do, but we're working with them on that. All we're asking for is operational costs in the amount of295.37 in the prosecution of this case. And again, the violation has been abated. MS. ARNOLD: So the county would be asking that you find a violation did exist. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Does Mr. Cabrera understand that? THE INTERPRETER: How much is the operational cost? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It's $295.37. THE INTERPRETER: He understands that. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do we have any questions? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Close the public hearing. Look for a motion first and finding of fact. MR. LEFEBVRE: Make a motion that there is in fact a finding of fact. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Violation did exist. MR. LEFEBVRE: Violation did exist. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I have a second? MR. MORGAN: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. KRAENBRlNG: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed? Page 45 l61A "2 November 29;4007 (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Look for a motion now as to imposing the operational costs per the county's request. MR. LEFEBVRE: Make a motion to impose the operational cost in the amount of$295.37 to be paid within 30 days. MR. DEAN: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. KRAENBRING: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. MARTIN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. MR. SNOW: Thank you for your patience today. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. Then we have the last stipulated agreement of 2007 -- MS. ARNOLD: We do have one more that was added. And expect another one. They're making copies. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do you want to take a break then? Cherie', how are you doing? MS. ARNOLD: Before we take a break, there has been a request. There is a respondent here that has a young baby, if we could take her out of order. And I'll let you know what that is when I come back. (Recess.) (At which time, Mr. Kraenbring is absent.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Attention. We need to bring the meeting back to order, please. Make note that one of our members had to leave, due to another Page 46 i "i ,Pf. ) t1,' , '::'<'1 November 29,2007 engagement. But we still have a quorum. Michelle, the case next? MS. ARNOLD: The next case is 2007-106, and it's Jaime Lam. There is another stipulation that's going to be heard after that, which is 2007 -116, Subway Plaza, Incorporated. And then we'll go to Ms. Ortiz, and that case would be 2007-120. (Speakers were duly sworn.) MS. WALDRON: For had record, Jen Waldron, Environmental Specialist, Collier County Code Enforcement. This is CEB Case No. 2007-106, Department Case No. 2006-031099. The address of the violation is 3580 First Avenue Southwest. The violation is of Collier County Land Development Code 04-41, as amended, Section 03.05.0l(B), described as vegetation removed over the allowable acreage without obtaining the proper permits. The Respondent Linh Lam has agreed to the stipulation. He has agreed to pay the operational costs in the amount of$455.76 incurred in the prosecution of this case within 30 days ofthis hearing. He's also agreed to prepare a mitigation plan which meets the criteria stated in 04-41 as amended, Section 10.02.06.E.3. The mitigation plan shall be prepared by a person who meets or exceeds the credentials specified in Section 0.02.02.A.3. The respondent is required to establish a monitoring program that would determine the 80 percent survivability of species of the plants used in the mitigation effort over a two-year period, with replacement required to maintain the 80 percent minimum annually. A minimum of two reports will be submitted by the respondent. This mitigation plan must be submitted within 60 days of this hearing or a daily fine of $200 will be imposed for each day until mitigation plan is submitted. All plant materials must be installed in accordance with the mitigation plan within 30 days of acceptance of mitigation plan or a Page 47 161 A ~ ,-:~ November 29, 2007 daily fine of $200 will be imposed for each day until the plant material is installed. And respondent agrees to notify code enforcement when the violation has been abated to perform a site inspection. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Lam, do you understand the stipulation? MR. LAM: I do. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any questions, comments? MR. DEAN: Just one question. Time frame. That was done in March of'06 and we're all the way down to 8/16/07. MS. WALDRON: I spoke to Mr. Lam today. The Notice of Violation was served to his father who lives on the property and they were never given the copy of the Notice of Violation. So the first copy they received was the notice of hearing. So we agreed to give them more time with the holidays also to get that in it. MR. MORGAN: They've been very cooperative in getting this work done? MS. WALDRON: Yes. MR. LEFEBVRE: I have a couple of questions. First of all, is this area irrigated at the present time? MR. LAM: Excuse me? MR. LEFEBVRE: Is there irrigation? MR. LAM: No. MR. LEFEBVRE: We are going into the dry season, so what I'm worried about is if these plants are planted, if they're going to survive. MS. WALDRON: I believe there's someone on the property that will be able to do irrigation, or you could set up temporary irrigation, correct? MR. LAM: Definitely, yes. MR. PONTE: How much acreage is involved here? MS. WALDRON: It's 2.73 acres. They're allowed to clear one acre on the property. And the majority of the property has been Page 48 0;;ov:rn~r2~007 cleared. There are still some trees left on the property. But he also explained to me that appear lot of trees that were removed were damaged from Hurricane Wilma and there were also a lot of dead trees on the property. So what will happen is the environmental consultant will take all of that into consideration when they come up with a mitigation plan for this property. MR. PONTE: I just share my colleague's concern about the fact that welre entering a very dry season and already having problems. And if irrigation is not -- if an irrigation system is not in place now, chances of survival of new plantings I would think would be at risk. MS. WALDRON: Well, that's up to your discretion, if you would like to postpone it until -- the planting until the rainy season starts. But like this year we had a big problem because there really wasnlt a rainy season, so. MR. KELLY: Which is even -- MS. WALDRON: It's a very difficult situation, because we just donlt know what's going to happen. MR. KELLY: Which could potentially be a worse situation, now, going into our dry season after already being so dry. I'm concerned about the $200 a day fine. I think that's excessive. In previous environmental cases it's been about 100 bucks a day. So that was one comment. And then also, out of that removal was there any exotics, and should those be taken into consideration? MS. WALDRON: There may have been exotics. Are exotics on some of the adjacent properties. Usually towards the front of the property, there is some Brazilian Pepper. And the environmental consultant will take all of that into consideration when they do their plan. MR. KELLY: And is there a way to get an after-the-fact permit and just get this approved? Page 49 ,; "..' II ~." , I,,: i1 ti- .", ,', I N;vember 29;2.007 MS. WALDRON: There's really -- we wouldn't approve an after-the-fact permit for this because it wasn't cleared for any kind of structure or any kind of use, so -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: If not, I'll close the public hearing, open it to the board for discussion, motion. MR. PONTE: Well, I don't have a motion, but I have several concerns. I do think the fine suggested by the county is high. I do think that the respondent is at considerable risk of not being able to cope with the survival of the plants. So I'm not quite sure how to word the motion. Obviously there's a violation. MS. BARNETT: Maybe lower the fine and extend the length of time to get the plants planted? MR. PONTE: Well, itls not the planting of the plants, it's the watering of the plants. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Well, if we extend the time to plant the plants, then it would be extended into the -- you could extend it into the rainy season. MR. PONTE: You're talking about extending it to April or May? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Um-hum. MS . WALDRON: I just want to comment on that, too. Last year the rainy season did not start till probably at least August, so -- MR. DEAN: Did I not hear the respondent say he had ways to irrigate? Did you -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: He said he had somebody that lived on the property that could water. MR. LAM: Yes. MR. LEFEBVRE: The problem I have, it's going to be watering an acre or so ofland, more than likely. I mean, that's a lot to walk around with a bucket or hoses or whatever the case may be. So -- MR. PONTE: They're already talking about putting limitations Page 50 ,.. A 16 lNovem~29, 2007 on watering just once a day -- I mean once a week, rather. MR. LEFEBVRE: I think if we accept the 30 days to submit the mitigation plan. MS. WALDRON: Sixty days. MR. LEFEBVRE: Sorry, 60 days to submit the mitigation plan and maybe 120 dates or 150 days after that the plantings, that would put them in a position where somewhere around potentially Mayor June that they could plant and give a chance of these plants surviving, or these trees surviving. MR. PONTE: I think that's the right direction. You want to make a motion? Or it is a motion? MR. LEFEBVRE: No, I threw out a couple of things. So 1'11 make a motion. 1'11 make a motion that the 455.66 -- is that correct? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: 76. MR. LEFEBVRE: 76, okay. __ 76 be paid within 30 days. The mitigation plan submitted within 60 days. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Or what's the fine? MR. LEFEBVRE: Or a fine oflet's say $75 a day. And then they will have -- well, I guess can I ask one question? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Urn-hum. MR. LEFEBVRE: Very specific. How long does it usually take to accept a mitigation plan? MS. WALDRON: Usually if they have it submitted, I can get it done in the same day. Ifthere needs to be changes, though, ifthere's something on there that needs to be amended, then they will have extra time to make those changes. MR. LEFEBVRE: So we're looking somewhere around the -- yeah, end of January submittal of the mitigation plan at the worst case scenario, another 15,30 days possibly to accept it ifthere has to be changes. So we're into February. Page 51 c, ,. i I, (.., ' ~ ......;. A 3 November 29, 2007 So let's say 120 days after the mitigation plan has been accepted to have the plantings in or a fine of$75. MS. WALDRON: The only thing I see is what happens -- the only problem I see is what happens if the rainy season does not start again. Then he's held to these-- MR. PONTE: Then he's back here. MS. WALDRON: -- time frames and we're back to the same thing that we're doing right now. MS. ARNOLD: Then he can come back and ask for a modification. MR. DEAN: Correct. Agreed. MR. KELLY: Can I make a suggestion on your motion? MR. LEFEBVRE: Sure. MR. KELLY: Ifwe said 180 days to apply, approve, plant. MR. LEFEBVRE: And have just one fine? MR. KELL Y: Just one date, one fine, and kind of go from there. This wi11leave it open. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I disagree with that, because I think you need to get the mitigation plan in first so that he has something to follow. And that could take time because he has to hire someone to do that. So I think it needs to be in two parts. MR. KELLY: Okay. MR. LEFEBVRE: With those changes, I make a motion. MR. PONTE: 1'11 second the motion. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed? Page 52 16) ~ovlber 29,2007 (N 0 response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do you understand what we did? We changed it. MR. LAM: Yes. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So you pay the operational costs of 455.76 within 30 days; you get your mitigation plan done within 60 days or a fine of$75 a day will apply. You will then have monitoring again for two years, as she had stated before. We did not change that. You can plant 120 days after the acceptance of the mitigation plan, or $75 a day will be incurred. And you must notify her when that is completed. Okay? MR. LAM: Yes, thank you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. MS. WALDRON: Thank you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So the next case would be 2007-116? MS. ARNOLD: Correct. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Subway Plaza. Is the respondent Ajay R. Patel, registered agent, here? MR. SANT AFEMIA: He was up until the last break. Never came back from the break. (Speaker was duly sworn.) MR. SANTAFEMIA: For the record, John Santafemia. S-A-N-T-A-F-E-M-I-A. Property Maintenance Specialist for Collier County Code Enforcement. This property -- or this case involves property located at 10565 Tamiami Trail North, also known as the Subway Plaza. It's CEB Case No. 2007-116, Department Case No. 2007-040895. I did meet with the property owner and registered agent, Mr. Ajay Patel this morning and discussed the case with him. He did agree to enter into a stipulation with me. He agrees that the -- or he stipulates that the violations do exist. Page 53 ~o~mber 29, 2007 The violations are that of Sections 2.02.03, 1 0.02.06(B)(1 )(a), and 10.02.06(B)(1)(e)(i) of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 2004-41, as amended, and are described as a commercially zoned structure with a second story being used as rental property for the employees of the Subway Restaurant located on the first floor. Additionally, a second story has been altered from the originally permitted condition without first obtaining Collier County permits. Mr. Patel agrees to pay the operational costs of $432.45 incurred in the prosecution of this case within 30 days of the scheduled hearing date, which is today, and abate all violations by ceasing the use of the second-story residential living space as rental property for all residents except for what is allowable in the C-3 zoning description outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code 2004-41 within seven days of this hearing or a fine of$50 per day will be imposed for each day the violation continues. Additionally, he agrees to obtain all required permits, inspections and certificate of occupancy for any unpermitted alterations to the second-story living space within 90 days of this hearing or a fine of $200 per day will be imposed for each day the violation continues. Alternatively, the respondent may obtain a demolition permit and convert the second story back to its originally permitted condition, and obtain all inspections and certificate of occupancy within 90 days of this hearing or a fine of $200 a day will be imposed for each day the violation continues. He also agrees to notify code enforcement, myself, when the violation has been abated in order to conduct a final inspection to confirm the abatement. I did check the status yesterday on this property. He has been issued a permit at this point, so he is well on his way to getting his inspections and his C.O. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Did he agree to the stipulation? 16f Page 54 161 A 3 November 29,2007 MR. SANT AFEMIA: Yes, he did. He did sign it. And like I said, he was here up until the last break. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That is him back there? MR. SANT AFEMIA: Oh, there he is. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Would you come up, please. Cherie', I'll have to ask you to swear him in. MS. ARNOLD: Can I just make a slight change? In the stipulation, it does say C-3 zoning description. It really should be the C-3 zoning district. Because the district describes all of the permitted uses. (Speaker was duly sworn). CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Good evening (sic), Mr. Patel. I believe you were in the room when he was going through most of the stipulated agreement. MR. PATEL: Yes. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So I'm going to ask you, do you agree to the stipulated agreement? MR. PATEL: Yes, I do. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do we have any questions, comments? MR. DEAN: I have a question. How many people live on that second floor? MR. PATEL: At this time, none. At the time I think two or three people were there. MR. DEAN: So nobody's there now? MR. PATEL: Sorry? MR. DEAN: Nobody's there now, right? MR. PATEL: No. MR. DEAN: Thank you. MR. LEFEBVRE: You said that there's a permit that has been applied for? MR. SANT AFEMIA: Correct. Page 55 C' ," 'r A 1,1' J ," \" 'Novem 29,2007 MR. LEFEBVRE: What is that permit for? MR. SANT AFEMIA: The permit is actually issued. It is to correct the violations. Some of the walls were moved. Interior walls were removed on the structure that had to be -- and that was done without permit. So he has gotten a contractor to pull the permit and get everything done correctly. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Anybody else? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I thought I saw a hand over on this side. Okay, if there are no other questions, then I'll close the public hearing, entertain a motion or discussion. MR. PONTE: I'll make a motion that we accept the stipulation as read. MR. LEFEBVRE: I'll second. MR. DEAN: I'll second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We have the motion and a second. All those in favor? MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed? (N 0 response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Stipulated agreement stands as read. Thank you. MR. PATEL: Thank you. MR. SANT AFEMIA: Thank you. MS. ARNOLD: I think now we are at 4-C-15, which is BCC versus Mrs. Ortiz. We do have two other stipulations that were added. Page 56 161A ';( November ~ 2007 And I'd rather do it after this particular case. And those are 4-C7 and 4-C-8. (Speaker was duly sworn.) MR. GANGULI: Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Rob Ganguli. Spelled G-A-N-G-U-L-I. (Speaker and Interpreter were duly sworn.) MS. MARKU: This is in reference to Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2007-120, Department Case No. 2007-040560. F or the record, I would like to state that the respondent is present. The respondent and the board were sent a packet of evidence and I would like to enter the packet of evidence as Exhibit A. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Entertain a motion. MR. DEAN: I'll make the motion for Exhibit A. MR. PONTE: Move to accept. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. LIESPERANCE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Opposed? (No response.) THE COURT REPORTER: Excuse me, I didn't get a second on that one. MR. KELLY: Motion, second. MR. DEAN: I made the motion. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: He made the motion, and he seconded. MS. MARKU: Violation of Ordinances 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, Sections 1 0.02.06(B)(1 )(a), 1 0.02.06(B)(1)( e), and 1 0.02.06(B)(1)( e )(i). Page 57 1611~ ~. November 29',2007 Description of violation: Unpermitted erection of wooden privacy fence, aluminum shade awning, and improvements including electrical and plumbing made to lanai enclosure and kitchen. Location/address where violation exists: 38 -- 2831 44th Terrace Southwest, Naples, Florida, 34116. Name and address of owner/person in charge of violation location: Ortiz, Yunier E. Date violation first observed: April 18th, 2007. Date owner/person in charge given Notice of Violation: April 19th, 2007. Date onlby which violation to be corrected: May 19th, 2007. Date of reinspection: June 14th, 2007. Results of reinspect ion: No permits applied for. At this time I would like to turn the case over to Code Enforcement Investigator Rob Ganguli. MR. GANGULI: Good morning. I'd like to start out with there's some question of the validity of this lady to represent the respondent. Her status hasn't quite been established yet. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. So this is not Mrs. Ortiz? MR. GANGULI: No, ma'am. Not as I understand her. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is she Mrs. Ortiz? THE INTERPRETER: She says that she's the common law wife. MR. DEAN: A what? THE INTERPRETER: Common law wife. They're not legally married. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Does she have a notified -- there is a letter that is required from the individual that is being charged that has to be -- MR. YBACET A: She says no. But if you need that, you can call him on the phone and he can attest to it. THE COURT REPORTER: May I have your full name, please? THE INTERPRETER: Yesenia Moncada. Y-E-S-E-N-I-A. Last Page 58 ,! 6 I A 3 November 29,2007 name M-O-N-C-A-D-A. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Jean, should we give -- MS. RAWSON: We need some authorization from her that she has his permission to represent him here today. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: She was saying that we could call him on the phone and ask him. Would that work? MS. RAWSON : Yes. Probably would have to have the inspector do it. MS. ARNOLD: Jean, I just would wonder who would recognize that she's calling Mr. Ortiz. Because the investigator had indicated that he wouldn't recognize his voice on the phone. THE INTERPRETER: She's stated that every time hels gone over to the house he's been the one thatls talked to her. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is that true? MR. GANGULI: Yes, ma'am. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So she has been there every time? MR. GANGULI: I can't testify to every time, but she has been there in the past. THE INTERPRETER: She has a driver's license that states that she lives there. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Can we have her just say for the record then she has permission? MS. RAWSON: She can say for the record that she lives there and that she has his authority to represent him here today. And, you know, then if we find out later that that's not true, then we'll have to deal with it. But if she puts that on the record. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, we need her to -- THE INTERPRETER: She has no problem giving that. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, she needs to make the statement then. And I guess you can interpret it. THE INTERPRETER: How would you like that? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We would like to say that she Page 59 16 't~ ~ d'-'J November 29,2007 lives there and that she has permission to represent Mr. Ortiz. THE INTERPRETER: She lives there. She lives on that address, and she has legal representation for it. MS. ARNOLD: Could we ask where Mr. Ortiz is? THE INTERPRETER: He's working in Texas. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Then I guess it would be kind of hard to have him here. I guess weill proceed then. That's what we can do. Thank you. MR. GANGULI: Yes, ma'am. Okay, this involves Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2007-120, Department Case No. 2007-040560. The location ofthe violation is 2831 44th Terrace Southwest in Golden Gate City, which is residentially zoned. The description of the violation is it involves several unpermitted improvements to the property. One is the erection of a wooden privacy fence; the addition of an aluminum shade awning to the lanai; structural improvements made to the lanai; and electrical and plumbing improvements made to the lanai and kitchen areas. THE INTERPRETER: No plumbing or electricity. MR. GANGULI: This case originated from a call-in complaint about unpermitted work. On April 19th, 2007, Investigator Ed Morad and myself met with the respondent who allowed an inspection of the property. At this time we took photographic documentation, as well as made explanations of the violation in English, and personal Notice of Violation service was achieved. Madam Chair, we don't have the luxury of an overhead projector and I have several photographs I'd like to submit. MR. KELLY: I make a motion we accept the photos. MR. LEFEBVRE: If! second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. DEAN: Aye.& Page 60 I61A ~ November 1'f, 2007 MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed? (No response.) MR. GANGULl: Ma'am, I have a second copy of them, if you'd like to pass them port and starboard in order to expedite this. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That would be great. MR. GANGULI: I can describe each and every one of them as rapidly or as slowly as you'd like. If you have any questions, I'll just begin. I-A depicts old fencing material with a new fence erected. I-B represents the new fence itself. 2-A is the lanai enclosure with a shade awning addition. 2-B is the shade awning addition itself. 2-C is the county property appraiser's depiction of the property. Am I going too fast for the board? MR. DEAN: No, we're fine. MR. GANGULl: 2-D is the property appraiser's aerial photograph of the property configuration. And 2-E is the same photograph with the area in question highlighted. 3-A is the structural modification of doors. 3-B is the structural modification of windows. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Those arenlt listed in the charging documents, are they, the doors and the windows? MS. ARNOLD: He indicated other structural improvements. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. MR. GANGULl: Exhibits 4-A, Band C depict interior electrical improvements to the lanai. Page 61 1~"'1 A ~ ~ovember z( 2007 Exhibits 4-D and E depict exterior electrical improvements to the lanai. THE INTERPRETER: Which numbers are those? MR. GANGULI: 4-D and 4-E are exterior electrical improvements. 4-F depicts electrical improvements in the kitchen. THE INTERPRETER: She states that existing electricity was there already. MR. GANGULI: And lastly, 4-G depicts the plumbing modifications in the kitchen. THE INTERPRETER: She says that the -- on this last picture what they removed was the cabinetry. This was the kitchen, but the plumbing and everything else remained the same. They were just removing the cabinetry. MR. GANGULI: Proceed? On June 29th, 2007, a meeting was held with the Collier County permitting staff when the respondent was given requirements necessary in order to retain the improvements made, as well as demolition options. THE INTERPRETER: The 1st of June? MR. GANGULI: 29th of June. This meeting was also attended by an architectural representative for the respondent. On September 13th, 2007, this case was prepared for the Code Enforcement Board when my investigation revealed that no permits had been applied for and attempts to contact the respondent for an update on his progress were unsuccessful. As of my final inspection conducted yesterday, November 28th, 2007, the violation remained. I'd like to add to the record that the notice of this hearing was posted on October 22nd, 2007, and that two days ago on November 27th, 2007, our secretary to the Code Enforcement Board received a Page 62 ~ir II '7 ,J . Novenmer ~'2007 request for continuance. It was explained that this request could not be considered unless it was received at least five business days prior to the date set for this hearing. And I'll withhold my recommendation until asked for. THE INTERPRETER: Could you repeat that, please, so I can -- and slower. MR. GANGULI: The notice ofthis hearing was posted on October 22nd, 2007. Two days ago, on November 27th, 2007. THE INTERPRETER: What date was that? MR. GANGULl: Two days ago, November 27th, 2007. Our secretary to the Code Enforcement Board, Bendisa, received a request for a continuance. And it was explained that the request could not be considered unless it was received at least five business days prior to the date set for the hearing. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: He is going to wait for his recommendation until afterwards, so it's her turn to speak, THE INTERPRETER: She didn't know that at the time when they tore down the fence and put it up that they needed a permit. What they were doing is taking out the old fence and putting in a new fence. And the next page, the pictures. This is the new fence that they've put up. She also stated that on the first page the fence that you see in the background is actually not hers. So the next packet, 2-A, this used to be a screened lanai and what she did was she closed it in and put in windows and altered it. And they made a terrace portion of it. You can see that on 2- B. They have hired an architect that is working on putting together permits for this, submitting to Collier County for it. And in the kitchen there was no changes in plumbing or electricity. It was just changing out the cabinetry, which they want to install new cabinetry. Page 63 161A 3 November 29,2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Question for her, then. Can she explain the picture 4-B? THE INTERPRETER: 4-B? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Urn-hum. THE INTERPRETER: She states that if you look at the receptacle towards the bottom, she says that that receptacle was there already. What she had added were from the same line done by an electrical technician. They've added the -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Explain to her that is an electrical change without a permit. THE INTERPRETER: Yes. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Would you please explain that to her. THE INTERPRETER: I'm sorry . Yes. She understands that. This is not on the kitchen, though. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: But itls saying lanai and kitchen. I'm just going through -- I believe the kitchen in question, the electrical, is 4-F. MR. GANGULI: Madam Chairman, that is correct. THE INTERPRETER: The sheetrock that you saw on that photo that went through the inside, from when they took out the door that led to the lanai, this portion stayed, so thatls where you see this. This is actually an existing. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Existing electrical? THE INTERPRETER: Yes. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: But exposed. THE INTERPRETER: But exposed, yes. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And it does look like on 4-G that they possibly removed the cabinets, and the plumbing was existing. THE INTERPRETER: She says yes, that is the old stuff. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. I will-- THE INTERPRETER: She's asking, do you need a permit to Page 64 r~" ~.... ~ ~vember 29, 2007 change the cabinetry? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes. It's any modifications, as I understand it. Donlt you, Michelle? MS. ARNOLD: I don't believe to change out their cabinets they wouldn't have to get a -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: But they didn't just change out cabinets, they did windows, walls. MS. ARNOLD: Well, I believe the person coming in will get a permit to do everything. I mean, had they just done a simple change out the cabinet, then it wouldnlt be -- but because of all of the -- THE INTERPRETER: She understands that. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. THE INTERPRETER: She understands that now. She says on the inside when she moved the cabinetry, because there was __ it was an infestation of roaches. She feels that for the kitchen she doesn't think that she needed a permit. But for the fence portion of it too, she didn't know that when you changed out a fence needed to pull a permit. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. I look to your recommendations, I guess. Or wait a minute. I guess we'd better close the -- do we have any questions? MR. DEAN: I have one. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Go ahead. MR. DEAN: Would you translate to the young lady that the reason we have permits for electrical and plumbing is to save the joy that just left the room that was in her arms. We've read stories and we have copies of stories of fires, and that's why welre strict on what we do with the permits. Especially for electrical. THE INTERPRETER: Okay, thank you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions? MR. KELLY: I just want to know if there's a permit on the house at all, any type of permit. Like did they do all of this work without any Page 65 l~IA 3 November 29, 2007 permit at all? MR. GANGULI: There was originally a permit for a lanai enclosure from 1990. It was drawn by a property owner previous to this one. And it was c.O.ld. I believe the photographs depict this work has taken place past 1990. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Anybody else? MR. LEFEBVRE: Yes, I do. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. MR. LEFEBVRE: The current is -- I saw a lot of wood and so forth. Has any of this been finished? THE INTERPRETER: No, it has not been finished. It's as is. What you see is what it is now. MS. ARNOLD: But she needs to obtain a permit to finish it, so-- MR. LEFEBVRE: Right, I understand. But I was wondering if it was moved along or if the project has stopped. THE INTERPRETER: She's stating that right now she's in the process of getting a permit. But depending on how much it cost, especially with impact fees and everything else, that she might opt just to remove everything and put as is, or as it was. MR. LEFEBVRE: What I'm worried about is there's a lot of exposed wiring in the status that it is. THE INTERPRETER: She had an electrician do all the work, all the electrical work, she says. MR. LEFEBVRE: But what I'm worried about, ifthere's any power to these outlets and so forth, with a baby in the house. THE INTERPRETER: She says that right now, no. Some of it is, some of it isn't. It's disconnected. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, if not, I'll close the public hearing, look for a finding of fact. Do I hear a motion? MS. ARNOLD: Would you like to hear the county's Page 66 '1) ~ I' '.' -~ \_,,~ I rr;J November 29,2007 '> recommendation? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Not until after we -- MS. ARNOLD: Okay. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: They wanted to wait until after they got the finding of fact. MS. ARNOLD: Sorry. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I started to do it that way and I got -- so -- MR. LEFEBVRE: I'd like to make a motion that there is a violation. MR. KELL Y: I'll second it. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have a motion and a second. All those in favor? MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We have found that there was or is a violation. And we'll now look to the county for their recommendation. MR. GANGULI: Ma'am, my recommendation is that the Code Enforcement Board order the respondent to pay all operational costs incurred in the prosecution ofthis case in the amount of$338.93 within 30 days of this hearing. THE INTERPRETER: How much is that? MR. GANGULI: $338.93. THE INTERPRETER: $338.93. MR. GANGULI: Within 30 days. Page 67 , r fi! .'. ' Ii.. f, No~e~ber ~~, 2~7 And abate all violations by obtaining a Collier County building permit, all required inspections and certificate of occupancy within 90 days of this hearing. THE INTERPRETER: 90 days? MR. GANGULI: Yes. Or a fine of $200 a day will be imposed. THE INTERPRETER: $200 a day? MR. GANGULI: $200 a day will be imposed for each day any violation remains. THE INTERPRETER: 90 days to finish it or $200 a day? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Correct. MR. GANGULI: C.O.'d within 90 days or a fine of $200 a day. Or by obtaining a Collier County demolition permit, all required inspections and certificate of completion, and restoring the structure to its originally permitted condition within 90 days of this hearing or a fine of $200 a day will be imposed for each day any violation remains. And lastly, the respondent must notify code enforcement when the violation has been abated in order to conduct a final inspection to confirm abatement. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. Comments from the board as far as how they want to proceed? MR. KELLY: I like the county's recommendation. I think the time frame and the amount of the fines are appropriate. MR. MORGAN: Second. MR. KELLY: That was my comment, but I'll make that into a motion. I make a motion we accept the county's order. MR. MORGAN: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. MORGAN: Aye. Page 68 161 A 3 November 29,2007 MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Stands as the county stated. So that's what she has to do. Does she understand all that? THE INTERPRETER: Yes. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. THE INTERPRETER: You're welcome. MR. GANGULI: Thank you for your patience. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is the next case 2007-l13? MS. ARNOLD: One, one -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Three and four? 112 and 113. (Speakers were duly sworn.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Are we ready? MR. BALDWIN: Board of County Commissioners, Collier County Florida versus 10bani Gonzalez. We have entered into a stipulation agreement. The undersigned 10bani Gonzales on behalf of himself has represented for the respondent and entered into a stipulation and agreement with Collier County as the resolution of notices of violation ofthe recurring violation in reference to the original Case No. 2006-110054, dated the 2nd day of November, 2006. The violations noted in the referenced Notice of Violation are accurate and I stipulate to their existence. The violations are of section 2005-44 of the litter, weeds and exotics ordinance and are described as litter consisting of but not limited to vehicle parts, assorted wood, metals, plastics, et cetera. Therefore, is it is agreed between the parties that the respondent shall pay the operational costs in the amount of $301.41 that incurred in the prosecution of this case. As of yesterday, November 28th, 2006 (sic) the violation was Page 69 ['fI'. A 3 IC: November 29,2007 abated. And number three, Collier County would give 60 days from this hearing -- from the date of this hearing to pay the operational costs of the 301.41. And we have down here respondent must notify the Code Enforcement when the violation has been abated. But again, I was out at the property yesterday and the violation has been abated. MR. LIESPERANCE: May I make a note that you meant yesterday, 2007, this year. MR. BALDWIN: Yes. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do you understand the stipulated agreement, that you have to pay the operational costs? Do we have any questions or comments? MR. LEFEBVRE: Was the operational cost to be paid within-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Sixty days. MR. LEFEBVRE: Within 60, okay. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And ifthere's no questions or other comments, then I'll close the public hearing and look to entertain a motion. MR. LEFEBVRE: Make a motion to accept the stipulated agreement. MR. MORGAN: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) Page 70 '1' l' A . "~.J' , 3 ".~-' .:,..... November 29, 2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. And for his next case? (All speakers were duly sworn.) MR. BALDWIN: Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida, versus Jobani Gonzalez. CEB No. 2007-113. Department No. 2007-051073. The county's entered into a stipulation agreement with Mr. Gonzalez. He's here to represent himself. Respondent entered into the stipulation agreement with Collier County as the resolution of notice of violations for the repeat violation that was previously adjudicated on April 26th, 2007 by the Code Enforcement Board, our reference Case No. 2006-11055. And that was dated the 2nd day of November, 2006. The violations noted in the reference -- referenced notice of violation are accurate, and I stipulate to their existence. The violation is that of Sections 2.02.03, prohibited uses ofthe Collier County Land Development Code and are described as the owner storing vehicles, dump trucks not belonging to anyone residing on the Estates-zoned property, and owner using the Estates-zoned property for storage in a mechanics shop which is not an allowable use for the zoning district. Therefore, the both parties agreed upon: Number one, pay operational costs in the amount of 455.40 incurred in the prosecution of the case. And two, the respondent would abate all violations. He must cease and desist using the property for storage of vehicles and the mechanic shop. Owner must use this property only as allowed under the Land Development Code. Owner shall comply by removing all stored vehicles or equipment within three business days ofthis hearing or a fine of $300 a day will be imposed until the violation is abated. B, if the violation is not abated by the end of the third business Page 71 16 I' '::~ November 29, 2007 day, the Collier County Code Enforcement may hire a licensed contractor to remove the commercial vehicles and may obtain assistance from the Collier County Sheriffs Department, and all costs of abatement will be assessed to the property owner, including a daily fine. e, Collier County to impose a fine of $100 a day commencing from July 31 st, 2007 for the repeat violation of prohibited uses of Section 2.02.03, specifically the storage of commercial vehicles, until October 11th, 2007 for a total of71 days. That equals $7,100. But Collier County will reduce the total amount of the $7,100 to a totalof$2,500. D, the respondent must notify the code enforcement investigator when the violation has been abated in order to conduct the final inspection to confirm abatement within 24 hours. And E, Collier County will give 60 days from the date of this hearing for the total payment of $2,500 plus operational costs of $455.40, equaling $2,955.40 to be paid. And the violation has been abated as of right now. But the problem with this property was commercial vehicles kept coming back to the property, so I would still like to after three business days go out and conduct my final investigation. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have a question for Jean. Only because we've never done a case where we've gone without an actual charging document. I mean, I know itls a repeat, but they're going back to their -- have we ever done that before, and is that allowed? MS. RAWSON: We've done several repeat violations. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Repeat violations, yes, we usually up the fines from that time frame but we don't go back to the original date that -- MS. RAWSON: No, we donlt. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I donlt think welve done that before, have we? Page 72 <CJ} {' ~~,; NO;~~b~r ~~, 2J MS. RAWSON: We have not. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Are we allowed to do that? Because there's no charging document to -- I mean, there was no case at that point. It was abated and now this is a new case. So there was no standing case. MS. RAWSON: I understand. I think what I heard him -- the inspector just say, that the violation has now been abated. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Again. It was abated before, but they're wanting to charge him $100 a day from July 31 st of 2007 to October 11th because he was in violation during those time frames. MS. RAWSON: I don't think that they're going to charge him that unless there's another violation. MS. ARNOLD: Let me just -- the statute allows you to go back-- once you've adjudicated a case -- and I was asking the investigator for the prior order. So this is a repeat violation. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I know it's a repeat. We usually just up the fines. MS. ARNOLD: Right. But the statute allows for you to go back to the date that the violation reoccurred and charge from that date until it's been abated. I think the recommendation is to -- although you could do that 7,100, the county's requesting that you charge a penalty for the repeat violation of 2,500. MR. BALDWIN: And actually, the case was reopened a month after, after four -- it was adjudicated on 4/26/2007. I received -- well, the county received an anonymous complaint in May, a month later, that the case opened up. But I did not get on the property to inspect the commercial vehicles on the property until 7/31 of 107. And I was on the property with my supervisor and Collier County Sheriffs Department. And we could confirm that the trucks on the property were not belonging to anyone residing on the property. Page 73 '~r: ;(~ Novembe; 29,4073 And I have photos from 7/31 to 10/11 of '07 when those vehicles were removed. And that was 71 days. And so it's actually the 71 days from when I could actually prove that the trucks were on the property. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I just wanted to make sure we-- MS. RAWSON: No, that's fine. That's permissible. Did he sign a stipulated agreement to this? MR. BALDWIN: Yes. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Do we have any other questions? MR. PONTE: Yeah, I don't really understand the rationale about dropping the fine, I guess, from $7,100 to $2,500. What's the reason for this generous negotiated reduction? MR. BALDWIN: The county's reasoning for the reduction is that on 7/31 finally we learned that the owner did not actually live in the house 7/31/07. He was not living in the house, he was living somewhere. Up until that time for the previous year and a half we were told by the people living in the house who were on the deed at one time that he was living in the house and he just would not either call me back or return any of my phone calls. So the county is giving him a little leeway in this. And then from 7/31 he still had until October 11th to abate the violation, and so those are the 71 days that we were concerned about. MR. PONTE: Thank you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, ifnot, first let me ask, Jobani, do you understand the stipulated agreement? MR. GONZALEZ: Yes. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Did you understand you're not allowed to do this? MR. GONZALEZ: I'm not living in the house. But it's in my Page 74 ,..... , 16 'i: .~ November 29, 2007 name, so I have to pay. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. No other questions, I'll close the public hearing and move to the board for either discussion or a motion. MR. KELLY: I make a motion that we accept the county's recommendation. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Are we finished with stipulated agreements, I believe? MS. ARNOLD: We're finished with stipulations and agreements. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We've got six hearings. Do we want to get through those and then maybe break for lunch? And then we'll go back to the Blocker case, ifthat's okay with them? MS. ARNOLD: I think that Patrick's okay with us hearing all the other cases prior to -- MR. WHITE: I agree with that and had asked Michelle on our break, thank you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, so then I guess the first case we need to hear is Board of County Commissioners versus E's Country Store. MS. ARNOLD: Correct. MS. MARKU: This is in reference to Code Enforcement Board Page 75 .., 6 ' , .. ., l "'Ii kq '2 ""." November 29,2007 Case No. 2007-96, Department Case No. 2006-120386. F or the record, I would like to find out if the respondent is present? MR. SNOW: The respondent was here earlier, he is not here now. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I don't think I understand why. MR. SNOW: We'll clear it up. MS. MARKU: The respondent and the board has received a packet of evidence and I would like to enter the packet of evidence as Exhibit A. MR. LEFEBVRE: Make a motion to accept the package. MR. PONTE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) MS. MARKU: Violation of Ordinances 04-41, Collier County Land Development Code, as amended, Sections 5.06.04(C)(8)(B), 5.06.04(C)(8)(C), 5.06.04(C)(8)(D) and 5.06.04(C)(8)(E). Description of violation: Sign installed without obtaining proper permits, and did not obtain all inspections and CO, certificate of completion, within 60 days of after-the-fact permit issuance. Location/address where violation exists: 14344 Immokalee Road. Folio 76422000065. Name and address of owner/person in charge of violation location: E's Country Store, LLC. Burton Eisenbud, as registered Page 76 1~6 fir '3 November 29, 2007 agent for 21246C Clubhouse Drive, Boca Raton, Florida, 33434. Date violation first observed: December 12th, 2006. Date owner/person in charge given notice of violation: April 7th, 2007. Date on/by which violation to be corrected: April 30th, 2007. Date of reinspection: August 10th, 2007. Results of reinspection: The violation has been abated. The respondent has also paid the operational costs incurred in the case. MS. ARNOLD: I just want to correct that at the time, the August 10th '07, the violation remained, but the last reinspection was when? Yesterday? MR. SNOW: Yes, ma'am. MS. ARNOLD: Yesterday, September 28th (sic), and at that time the violation was abated. (All speakers were duly sworn.) MR. SNOW: For the record, Investigator Kitchell Snow, Collier County Code Enforcement. We request that a finding of fact that there was a violation on the property issued. This was a sign without a permit. They were required to get all inspections through certificate of completion within 60 days of permit issuance. The permit was issued on 5/23 -- I'm sorry, 5/30/2007. The CO came at 10/10/2007, so there were a little bit past their time frame. He did come in, they have complied. The violation is abated. They have paid operational cost. And I guess Mr. Eisenbud didn't feel he needed to be here anymore from that, so that's where we're at. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. Any questions? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Ifnot, close the public hearing, look for a finding of fact. MR. KELLY: I'll make a motion that a violation did exist. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. Page 77 '11~ .~ .& 6 i g', ~ ". November 29, 2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And as there are no fines incurred because operational costs have already been paid, that concludes it. MR. SNOW: Thank you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. The next one would be Board of County Commissioners versus Emma Houston. MS. MARKU: This is in reference to Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2007-114. Department Case No. 2007-07-0595. F or the record, I would like to ask if the respondent is present? The respondent is present. (All speakers were duly sworn.) MS. MARKU: The respondent and the board is in receipt of packet of evidence and I would like to enter the packet of evidence as Exhibit A. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have a motion? MR. PONTE: Move to accept. MR. DEAN: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. Page 78 1 ~f' A ~ November 29,2007 MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) MS. MARKU: Violation of ordinances 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, Sections 4.02.01(A), Table 2.1, 1 0.02.06(B)(l )(A), 1 0.02.06(B)(l )(E), 1 0.02.06(B)(l )(E)(I), and Sections 105.1 of the Florida Building Code 2004 Edition. Description of violation: Two mobile homes on property which are approximately 18 to 24 inches from the rear property line in violation of setback requirements. Also, both mobile homes have been illegally converted from single-family units to multi-family without proper permits, and both mobile homes also have additions which are unpermitted. Location/address where violation exists: 415 South Third Street, Immokalee, Florida. Name and address of owner/person in charge of violation location: Emma Houston, P.O. Box 1275, Immokalee, Florida. Date violation first observed: July 18th, 2007. Date owner/person in charge given Notice of Violation: August 8th, 2007. Date onlby which violation to be corrected: September 21 st, 2007. Date of reinspection: September 21 st, 2007. Results of reinspection: No corrective action taken. For the record, I would like to state that a couple days ago I spoke with Ms. Houston and she requested a continuance of the case, and I stated that due to not being sufficient time and timely manner I could not accept that continuance. At this time, I would like to turn the case over to investigator John Santafemia. Page 79 1'6' f H~ ~ ,-;fl" November 29,2007 MR. SANTAFEMIA: For the record, John Santafemia, S_A_N_T_A_F_E_M_I_A, Property Maintenance Specialist for Collier County Code Enforcement. MS. ARNOLD: I don't know if the board before going through this wants to hear why Ms. Houston wants to do a continuance. Because she approached me out in the hall so -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Actually, she wasn't granted the right to one. MS. ARNOLD: Well, I think you can consider one here. We just couldn't do it -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Through your channels? MS. ARNOLD: Right. MR. LEFEBVRE: We didn't accept it on the last case, which, same situation, there was a request for continuance, and -- MR. L'ESPERANCE: I think we should still hear her request, though. MS. RAWSON: I think what happened on the last case, there was no objection because the person was here. I think they can't accept the continuance unless they get it five days in advance, in all fairness to you. But we have people here that come and stand before you and say please give me a continuance and you grant them. So I think you should probably hear her. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'll go ahead, John, before you start, and we'll go ahead and see what she has. MS. HOUSTON: Thank you. I'm put in a position that not only am I put into, but I have met the code enforcement at my place because of a tenant. And she was three months behind in rent and she called the code enforcement. And at that time I just happened to be on the premises when he checked her house. And that's when I was -- you know, with him. And it was weeks after that I got a paper after he give me the things to Page 80 10 1#1 ~ November 29,1007 correct, I went ahead and did it, which went into about 4,000 and some dollars of my money, which -- you know, personal money. And then when it come to this, I had like that case confusing also with a lot of paperwork with this case and another case which was in Fort Myers, all because ofthe divorce that I have this property. I didn't do this, but I'm accused of this. And I did not know that the hearing that I'm attending today was at this impact. I got to sit with him today and find out, you know, about the setback. I know he said that I was not -- you know, didn't have a permit. So then I needed representation, and the papers that I have did not do any measurements or whatever because I'm not familiar with these things. So then I did not -- the person that was supposed to come this morning, they could not come because they didn't have coverage at their office. So I am in a position. If! have to go on with this, I must, but I am not ready. But that's what I'm saying this morning. And I got into this through a divorce, and this was part of what the judge give me, because it was not agreement. And I'm knowledge about now that these things are not permittable. This is my inheritance of my divorce, why I'm standing here today. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So in giving you a continuance, what is that going to allow you to do? MS. HOUSTON: It allows me to get some legal representation and get some checking back and measurements and to make sure that I am knowing what I'm doing. Because right now I do not know what I'm doing, okay. And I'm not -- and I don't have any representation. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: What's the county's stance for delaying this until January? MR. SANTAFEMIA: Well-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And allowing her to get legal representation? MR. SANT AFEMIA: I don't necessarily oppose a continuance. I Page 81 "fJ # rrv . ('" J. If'I ' November 29,2007 , understand her situation. She does have several issues. This case was actually brought to my attention through an investigation into a property maintenance minimum housing issue. So she does have a lot of things going on this property. Where I kind of part company with her a little bit is that she has had a lot of time already to work on this problem, to start something on this problem. I know you got a copy of my Notice of Violation in your packet. If you look at it, the supplementals are very specific about what she needs to do. The first line in my order to correct states that she needs to hire a licensed professional to help her with this problem. She has done -- to my knowledge has done none ofthat. She did inform me today that she did hire somebody, a contractor, but -- and there was some confusion about what case she was working on. My concern is that if you give her a continuance that nothing's going to come of it. But it is your choice and I don't necessarily oppose it. MS. ARNOLD: My request is that because there has been an issue with Ms. Houston picking up her mail, so if you do get notice from the post office that you have mail from the county, if you could go ahead and do that. And I would request that notice be waived for the next meeting so that we don't have an issue with future notice. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions, comments from the board? MR. PONTE: I don't see we have any option whatsoever. If someone requests legal representation, they must be granted. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'll entertain a motion then for a continuance until the January meeting, with the stipulation that you waive your right to notice, which means you know you have to be here. MS. HOUSTON: Yes, I will. Page 82 16'1 /lrt ~ MovenllJer 29;'2007 And may I add, I have stayed in Collier County for over 40 years, and I have had notices, and I always show up and am responsible. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm just letting you know that we won't be sending you a notice. We're just telling you right now that if we grant this and vote on it, that you will have your continuance and it will be in the January meeting. MR. LEFEBVRE: Which is what day? MS. RAWSON: 24th. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The 24th of January. MR. PONTE: And at a different location. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Right, it will be at the courthouse, I believe. MS. ARNOLD: It will be downtown. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So we have a motion. Do I have a second? MR. DEAN: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? MR. LEFEBVRE: Opposed. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The next case would be Board of County Commissioners versus Stanley Fogg, Jr. and Theresa M. Fogg. MS. MARKU: This is Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2007-115, Department Case No. 2007-040776. F or the record, the respondent is present. The respondent and the board were sent a packet of evidence and I would like to enter the packet of evidence as Exhibit A. Page 83 ]6 November 29, 2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Entertain a motion. MR. LEFEBVRE: Make a motion to accept. MR. PONTE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) (All speakers were duly sworn.) MS. MACALISTER: For the record, I would just like to add that my name is Colleen MacAlister, and I'm here today as representative for Mr. Fogg. We'll both be speaking this morning. Madam clerk, my name is C-O-L-L-E-E-N, M-A-C-A-L-I-S-T-E-R. And as I came in late, I apologize that we don't have an additional supplemental packet for you. MS. MARKU: Violation of ordinances 2004-41, as amended, Section 2.02.03 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Description of violation: Sheds being sold on agricultural zoned property . Location/address where violation exists: 10270 Immokalee Road, Naples, Florida, 34120. Name and address of owner/person in charge of violation location: Stanley Fogg, Jr. and Theresa M. Fogg, 6151 Everett Street, Naples, Florida, 34112. Date violation first observed: April 23rd, 2007. Date owner/person in charge given Notice of Violation: June 19th, 2007. Page 84 161A 3 November 29,2007 Date onlby which violation to be corrected. July 19th, 2007. Date of reinspect ion: July 19th, 2007. Results of reinspection: Violation remains. At this time I would like to turn the case over to Code Enforcement Investigator Michelle Scavone. MS. SCAVONE: For the record, Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Michelle Scavone. This case is in reference to Department Case No. 2007-04-0776. Violation of the Ordinance 2004-41, as amended, Section 2.02.03 of the Collier County Land Development Code, selling of sheds on agriculturally zoned property. This case was started as an anonymous complaint on March 9th, 2007 for displaying sheds on the front property off of Immokalee Road and should not be displaying anything. April 23rd, 2007, a site visit was made. It was observed that sheds were being displayed on the agriculturally zoned property, approximately 15 or more. Extensive research was done and the owner was contacted. Mr. Fogg admitted the sales of the shed and insisted that he could sell them on his agriculturally zoned land. It was expressed to Mr. Fogg that he would need a zoning verification letter to clarify land use, and time was granted for him to get the verification letter. June 19th, 2007, still no letter had been obtained, so personal service ofthe Notice of Violation was served to Mr. Fogg at the Immokalee Road address. June 22nd, 2007, a copy of the verification letter was obtained. And I'd like to submit that into evidence. MR. KELLY: Make a motion we accept the packet. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. Page 85 16 J.( 0 November 29, 2007 MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. MS. SCAVONE: In that letter, it was concluded by Ross Gochenaur, the planning manager of the zoning and land development review department, that regarding the sale of prefabricated sheds as an accessory use to Fogg's Retail Nursery, the sale of prefabricated sheds is not considered a valid accessory use to the principal use of a retail plant nursery and is therefore prohibited on the property, therefore, not to be considered an accessory to the retail plant nursery. September 10th, 2007, I obtained some pictures, and would like to enter them into the evidence as County Exhibit B. MR. KELL Y: I make a motion we accept the Exhibit B. MR. DEAN: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) MS. ARNOLD: I think that would be C. The second one was B and then this is C. MS. SCAVONE: Okay. The first picture is just of the sign showing that it's Fogg's, and that sheds are that way, the display of the sheds. The second picture is the sheds on the property. And the third is a Page 86 161i~ ~~ November 2(2007 different angle of the sheds on that same property. As of this present date the violation remains. And I would like to enter into evidence the County's exhibit for the last picture. Are we on D now? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear a motion to accept the packet? MR. KELLY: Motion to accept. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) MS. SCAVONE: The sheds are still for sale on the agricultural zoned property in violation of Collier County Land Development Code. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Madam Chair, I'm going to recuse myself from voting on this particular case. The counsel is involved with a legal issue that I'm also involved in. So I'm going to recuse myself from voting. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's fine. You'll have to get with Jean to get a paper that you need to fill out and then you return it, I believe, to Cherie'. Okay. Ready to hear from you. MS. MACALISTER: Thank you. I think part ofthe issue here is the interpretation ofthe Land Development Code. When Mr. -- and I apologize in advance if! slaughter this gentleman's name -- Mr. Page 87 16 Lo~em~ 29, 2007 Gochenaur issued his letter, I think he took some rather casual-- he chose a rather casual definition of the retail sales ordinance section of the Land Development Code. What the code actually says under retail plant nurseries subject to the following conditions is: Retail sales shall be limited primarily to the sale of plants, decorative products, such as mulch or stone, fertilizers, pesticides and other products and tools accessory to or required for the planing and maintenance of said plants. Mr. Fogg's position is that storage sheds are an integral part of the maintenance accessories to any plant maintenance regime. I don't have statistics on how many sheds are sold for other purposes in Collier County but my guess is most of them house mulch, dirt, rakes, et cetera. I think the other thing about the letter is that he takes the interpretation that they are intended for much more than general use. Well, a lot of agricultural products have multiple uses. And again, he says that sheds are not mentioned. Well, if you look at the Land Development Code ordinance itself, neither are rakes, neither are hoes, and yet no one would take issue with the fact that hoes and rakes are accessories or other products necessary to maintenance of plants in agricultural use. I have asked the county for any precedent that would support an interpretation that sheds are a prohibited use. I would also point out that the Land Development Code, where it wants to prohibit something, has specifically prohibited it, namely, the sale of large power equipment, such as lawn mowers, tractors and the like shall not be permitted in association with a retail plant nursery in the rural agricultural district. So where the commissioners chose to limit the application, they have done so specifically. I think that in this particular case the planning department simply took a position that because it wasn't dirt and it wasn't mulch, it wasn't an appropriate item for sale in a retail agricultural environment, Page 88 161 " I~ November 29;1'007 ..... ,. without any real fundamental justification for tht position other than well, we just don't think it is. And I would suggest that, as I said, most storage sheds in Collier County house rakes, tools, hose, dirt, mulch and pots for plants. We have some photos -- and again, I apologize that we had them late __ that Mr. Fogg took. And they show-- MR. FOGG: You want me to just show them all that? MS. MACALISTER: Yeah, why don't I let him -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: First get a motion to accept your pictures as your first exhibit. MR. DEAN: Motion to accept. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: But I think the county wants to look at them first, right? (Speaker was duly sworn.) MR. DANTINI: I might object to the -- what are the pictures of? MR. FOGG: They're pictures of sheds used in an agricultural operation, including my own. MR. DANTINI: Not the sheds on your property? MR. FOGG: One of the -- yes, two of them are on my property. And then I showed some examples of other nurseries and agricultural operations right in the local area that also have sheds also. MR. DANTINI: I object to the pictures, because they don't represent the sale of the sheds from his property. It has -- MR. FOGG: They represent the evidence that a shed is an accessory use to agricultural operation. That's what they -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'll note your exception, but we have a motion on the floor. I believe there was one. MR. DEAN: I made the motion. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: He made the motion. We need a second to accept the packet as their -- MR. DANTINI: I'm sorry. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I have a second? Page 89 1~ i A 3 Nove~er 29, 2007 MR. LEFEBVRE: I make the second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. We will note your exception. MS. MACALISTER: I might point out to the board that Mr. Fogg has been a retailer on Immokalee Road for 20 years, 10 years in another location on Immokalee Road and 10 years in this location, without any code violations. He made a business decision that sheds were an appropriate item to sell to customers that he's selling plants, rakes, mulch and other agricultural plant products to. And he made that decision based on the experience that that is what most people buy a shed for. And I think the county has sort of stepped in here and decided to define business purposes of something that is a retail operation that is allowed under Land Development Code. I might also say that I think the operative word in the Land Development Code is maintenance of said plants. And I think there's no doubt that sheds are an integral part of the maintenance of plants that you buy in any setting. MR. FOGG: I'd like to give a couple of examples today, if! may. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Speak into the microphone more directly, please. MR. FOGG: I'd like to give a couple of examples of that, if! may. Page 90 16" A ~ ~vember 29, i007 The Collier County agricultural extension has two sheds or outbuildings. The Florida Department of Agriculture on Randall has three sheds on their property, zoned -- these are agricultural operations. Pelican Nursery has sheds, Ray's Lawn and Gardens has a shed. A lot of operations, I have sheds for my operation. It's a bona fide accessory. And that's my point. It's definitely a bona fide accessory. It does not state anywhere in the law that a shed is not. And that's -- MR. DANTINI: May I intervene on that one? First of all, I don't believe that they were selling their sheds on their properties; that they had placed them on there, but they weren't for sale. The second thing, the county does not -- did not just pick something out of the sky and say the sheds aren't part of this -- the problem here, it says under the standard industrial classification code on No. 5211 that prefab sheds are a building -- buildings including sheds are identified under the SIC Code 5211 that are sold under lumber and other building material dealers. And it doesn't have anything to do with nurseries. And that's a Bible they go by as far as land use on a lot of their decisions. MS. MACALISTER: I am not aware, is that incorporated by reference into our Land Development Code, the standard industrial classifications? MR. DANTINI: That is something that they use for reference. MS. MACALISTER: I understand that. But is it technically legally part of our Land Development Code as a basis for making decisions under our Land Development Code? MR. DANTINI: I'm not a planner so I can't answer that. MS. MACALISTER: I'm just not aware that it is, so I'm not aware how relevant that classification is to the discussion here. I think we need to look to the language that we have before us that was Page 91 Vy[ "JJ ~ N6'v~mbe; 19, 2!f11J7 provided by the county. MS. RAWSON : You've got to look at the statute as it's written, the ordinance as it's written. MR. LEFEBVRE: When Mr. Ponte gets done with that letter, can I please review that again? MR. FOGG: If I may, we're under the agricultural ordinance, not industrial ordinance. MR. DEAN: Can I ask one question? Are some of these sheds permanent buildings? MR. FOGG: No. MR. DEAN: None of them are permanent? MR. FOGG: On my property I have two permanent sheds which I'm using myself. The other ones are not permanent. They're loaded on a truck and they're sold places like I was describing. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The pictures that he showed us of the other nurseries are permanent structures. MS. MACALISTER: If you would like the precise language of the statute to look at -- ordinance, I have it here. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes, please. Could I have that as MR. KELL Y: Make a motion we accept the Exhibit B from the respondent. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear a second? MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Page 92 No~e~lr 2~, 2J MR. DANTIN!: We have no objection. MS. SCAVONE: May I -- I just wanted to quote in the letter -- I don't know if everyone has gotten a chance to read it or not -- that it says, such prefabricated buildings are not directly related to growing and maintaining plants, and although they may be used for storage of tools and equipment related to growing and maintaining plants, they are not intended for much more of general use. So therefore, their sales would not be considered an accessory use to retail plant nursery. MS. MACALISTER: And of course that is precisely what I just took issue with, which is that the code doesn't require that they be directly related, it requires that they be an accessory to. And that was why I said I thought that the interpretation of the actual ordinance was really casual by the planning department. MS. ARNOLD: Can I just interject to something here? If there's a question with regard to the written interpretation that's been presented, there is a process afforded to the public to request a formal interpretation, and then if they disagree with that interpretation, it's appealable to the Board of County Commissioners. I don't know if it's correct for the Code Enforcement Board to be interpreting the code. It's left to the zoning department to do that, and that's the process that exists currently. MS. RAWSON: That's precisely what you're being asked to do. Ms. MacAlister's legal argument is that basically that that's the wrong interpretation of the statute, that the statute doesn't specifically prohibit this. In other instances when they mean to prohibit something, they say it. This is a legal interpretation of an ordinance, which is really probably beyond your purview. You can't really find that there's a violation existing unless you are sure what the statute means. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Correct. So -- MS. RAWSON: And I don't know that you can be the ones to interpret the statute without some more -- Page 93 ..-" 16bl A "2 Novem er 11J, 20if7 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It says products, but it doesn't specify what those products are, so -- MS. RAWSON: I didn't really know there was this process that you could do. I think Ms. MacAlister said she asked for precedence and apparently didn't get any. But I didn't realize that there was a process by which the county could help give you that interpretation. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We can't make a finding because we can't interpret the -- MS. RAWSON: Right. Unless Mr. Wright's here and wants to weigh in. MS. MACALISTER: Nonetheless, we are here on a code enforcement violation. So Mr. Fogg is a little bit between the proverbial rock and a hard spot here. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We understand that, we're trying to wrestle with it ourselves. MS. ARNOLD: Staff requested what they got and presented for you, and they're acting upon what they received from the zoning department. If there was an objection to that, then the respondent has the ability to request a formal interpretation. I'm going to have to kind of look to Jeff to see whether or not the board asks for a formal interpretation, how that whole thing works out. MS. SCAVONE: I just wanted to add that also in that letter that was received it says that if they wish to contest this decision they may apply to Susan, the zoning director for an official interpretation of the code. MS. ARNOLD: Right. And that's the process they should have taken if they object to that. MS. MACALISTER: For $1,500. That part ofthe sentence was left out. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'd like to get from Jeff some assistance here. MR. WRIGHT: Thank you, Madam Chairman. I'm not aware of Page 94 16!A ~ November 29, 2(l'th any provision that allows for this board to ask for a request for interpretation. That's not to say one doesn't exist. I'm just not aware of one. I've never seen it done in practice either. I think that the process that Michelle has just explained is the norm, and I know that that is expressed in the code. Without knowing absolutely for certain, my opinion would be that we would defer to the language that Michelle just quoted, which says if they have a problem with this interpretation, they go to her to follow up on that. So I'm not aware and I'm not confident that there's any provision that would allow direct request from this board to have Susan Istenes issue her interpretation in response to your request. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm kind of caught between-- MS. MACALISTER: I would like to say-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- an issue myself -- excuse me. MS. MACALISTER: I'm sorry ma'am. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: An issue myself because our attorney is telling us that technically their attorney is asking us to interpret the Land Development Code -- MS. ARNOLD: That's not what you do. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- and we can't do that. But without something -- we have the zoning interpretation, which mayor may not go along with how they're feeling. I'm not sure how we can rule. MR. WRIGHT: Well, I think that if they had a subsequent redetermination from the zoning director, they could bring that back to you and make their case and you would have jurisdiction to hear that. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So we would just have to go by what we have in front of us from the -- MR. WRIGHT: Exactly. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, thank you. MS. MACALISTER: If! might add, however, it seems to me that Page 95 1 '0 ~" !~17 November 29,2007 initially code enforcement interpreted the Land Development Code and cited my client, so we're now in front of the Code Enforcement Board that says that it's apparently deciding they don't have the authority to rule on the interpretation because we absolutely have a code violation here that says he's -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We have a ruling from the zoning department, who is the department that has the right to interpret the Land Development Code, as far as I'm understanding. What we're being asked to do by the county and what I am being instructed to do by the county's attorney and our attorney is to utilize that information to make our decision. If you disagree with that, you have the right to go back and ask the zoning department, pay the $1,500 fee, I understand, for the more formal interpretation. And if at that time it comes back in your favor and that we misinterpreted through what information we were given, you can come back to us and we will rehear it. That's what I am being instructed to do at this time. If that is the privy of the board. We haven't gotten that far. MS. MACALISTER: I understand. So what you're telling me is really your authority only extends to an up or down on the planning director's letter; is that correct? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes. Because I cannot -- we cannot as a board interpret the Land Development Code. MS. RAWSON: There's another alternative. If you find a violation exists because you believe the interpretation of the zoning board, knowing that you don't really have the power to interpret the statute, she can appeal and the court may interpret the ordinance. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. And that wouldn't be the $1,500 fee if you'd let the court do it. MS. RAWSON: No, it might be more. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Do we have any questions? MR. LEFEBVRE: Can I look at the LDC, please. Page 96 .. 16 Ii A 3 Novemoer 29,2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Sure. I'll pass both the letter and that back. MR. DANTINI: May I ask Mr. Fogg a question, please? MR. FOGG: Sure. MR. DANTINI: Is Steve LaRusso -- is he an employee of yours? MR. FOGG: He is my subcontractor selling sheds for me. He's my vendor. He represents Ted's Sheds as my vendor, yes. MR. DANTINI: Thank you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do you have any questions? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: If not, then I'm going to close the public hearing and open it up to the board for discussion. MR. KELL Y: I'll make a motion that a violation does not exist. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear a second? MR. DEAN: I'll second that motion. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Discussion? MR. PONTE: I'd like a little discussion on that, yes, because the photographic evidence that I saw and that was presented shows sheds, a couple of items that look like playhouses, or dollhouses. I didn't see any agricultural equipment or mulch or -- I didn't see anything there related to nurseries. I think there is a violation, just based on common sense of what I was looking at in the photo evidence. MR. KELLY: To answer why I don't think a violation exists, I believe that the attorney's suggestion that it was originally interpretated (sic) in a loose fashion from the planning department here, I tend to agree with. And I think that sheds are directly related to mulch, plants, nursery items that are allowed to be sold in this property the way it's zoned. MR. PONTE: I think that's true, except these are cosmetic sheds. The ones that we saw in the photo evidence have windows and things Page 97 1'6 I Ii Novembe?29,2107 like that. You don't put windows in a shed where you're going to store mulch. MR. KELLY: Well, actually, yeah, that's actually a feature of them. And if there was a better picture of the property zoomed back further, you would see not just bags of mulch, but entire piles larger than the size of buildings that are sold in bulk. So I think this is a bulk, if you will, kind of a wholesale nursery facility, who into this pretense should be allowed to sell sheds as well. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, I have a motion on the floor and a second. Any other discussion? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. All those opposed? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: We have a split decision. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: A split decision. MS. ARNOLD: Mr. L'Esperance, did you -- MR. L'ESPERANCE: I recused myself. MS. ARNOLD: Oh, that's right, I forgot about that. MS. RAWSON: A split decision is a denial. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is a denial, correct. So that means that the plaintiff has won. MS. RAWSON: Correct. MR. KELLY: Correct, the violation doesn't exist. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The violation does not exist. MS. MACALISTER: Thank you. MS. ARNOLD: Is that correct? Because a split decision is a Page 98 ClJ;,p'A J'~; f . ~ "",), ,.:J { . "': dt"..' November 29, 2007 ' denial of the motion at hand. They have the ability to -- MS. RAWSON: I think it's in our rules, isn't it? MS. ARNOLD: -- they have the ability to do additional motions if they want to. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Let me see. We happen to have our rules with us today. MS. RAWSON: No, that's right. Michelle's right, you can make another motion. MS. ARNOLD: Because it's -- no -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It's just a dead motion. MS. ARNOLD: The motion was that there was no violation, which fails. So you don't go away with no violation if there was no approval of the motion. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: This is just no approval of the motion. So entertain another motion. MR. KELL Y : We probably need more discussion to change one person's mind, at least. MR. LEFEBVRE: Can I look at the LDC once again? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm just thinking -- MS. ARNOLD: Can I ask the question, because Mr. Kelly did explain why he came to the conclusion, which seemed like an interpretation of what the zoning should say, or what the regulations should say. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The public hearing was closed, though, Michelle. MR. KELL Y: I will comment, though, for the general benefit, that although I can't interpret the code, I can interpret the letter that was being used, I guess, was my rationale behind it. MR. PONTE: But the letter says the sale of prefabricated sheds is not considered a valid accessory use to the principal use of a retail plant nursery and therefore prohibited on the property. Page 99 Nov~~e~19, ~7 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Accessory of sale of plants, stating that such sales limited primarily to the sale of plants, decorative products, tools, accessories to -- MS. ARNOLD: Can you speak into the mic? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Sorry. It says here the Land Development Code allows certain retail sales as accessory to the sale of plants, stating that such sales shall be limited to the sale of plants, decorative products and tools accessory to or required for the planting and maintenance of said plants. As you note in your letter, prefabricated sheds are not mentioned. If you pull out the LDC code -- if you'll give it to me, please -- it actually states that retail plant nursery subject to the following conditions. Retail sales shall be limited primarily to the sale of plants, decorative products such as mulch, stone, fertilizers, pesticides and other products, and tools accessory to or required for the planting or maintenance of said plants. MR. PONTE: May I just direct your attention to that paragraph that I underlined. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I know, I'm going on. It states -- it goes on to state that prefabricated sheds are not mentioned. Retail sales of prefabricated buildings including sheds are identified under SIC Code 5211, lumber and other building material dealers. Such prefabricated buildings are not directly related to growing and maintaining plants. And although they may be used for storage of tools and equipment related to growing or maintaining plants, they are intended for much more general use. The sales would therefore not be considered accessory to a retail plant nursery. MR. KELL Y: Shall I explain a little more why? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Sure. MR. KELLY: If you look at the letter from the zoning department -- I'm sorry, the department of zoning and land, there's a Page 100 1 '6'1"" " ,,~'. __ ~ ~ November 29;2007 statement that sheds are not considered accessory use, but yet under that it goes on to cite the zoning ordinance which does include those items necessary for planting and maintenance of said plants. So I believe in the letter itself there's a contradiction. I believe that a shed is necessary to house tools and equipment and fertilizers in order to maintain those plants. And then I go to the zoning code itself and it says planting and maintenance of said plants. That gave me the two bullets that I used to come up with the idea that they would be allowed. MR. LEFEBVRE: Can I see the LDC again, please. It says in Paragraph A in 2.03.01 that uses that are generally considered compatible to agricultural uses that would not endanger or damage agriculture, environment, potable water or wildlife resources to the county are permissible under conditional uses. Are we saying conditional uses -- conditional use on the next page under section two, it says accessory uses, uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right in a district. Are we saying that these -- are we saying that this needs a conditional use? MR. KELLY: I would say that it's not contradictory to the way that they're zoned and what their land use is allowing. MR. LEFEBVRE: But I'm wondering if this needs a conditional use. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I think we're trying to interpret the Land Development Code. MR. KELL Y: Yeah. And the letter also cites an occupational license. And is it possible that maybe the occupational license doesn't include sheds, yet they're trying to tie that into mounting a case against them. MR. LEFEBVRE: Well, it states that one of the conditional uses would be the sale of potentially what -- a shed. So with that being said, am I correct that there's a process to get a conditional use or is Page 101 '~"6' ; A 3 ";1.' t November 29,2007 that just granted under the LDC? MS. ARNOLD: Do you want us to answer that or -- MR. WRIGHT: Typically there would be a process for that. If! may just point out a couple of things. The zoning verification letter was in direct response to a request from the investigator that was made in April, a couple of months before. And in that letter from the zoning director, her responses are specific to this situation. And if you look at the NOV, it's the selling of sheds on ago zoned property. There's nothing to suggest that they're using these for mulch and storage. They're using them to sell them. And in that instance, the zoning director speaks directly to that. The sale is not considered valid and is prohibited. So I just wanted to clarify that for the record. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. Okay, we need a motion. MR. PONTE: I'll make a motion that a violation exists. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear-- MR. MORGAN: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So there is a violation that does exist. Recommendation from the county, please. MS. SCAVONE: The county recommends that the Code Enforcement Board order the respondent to pay all operational costs in Page 102 16' " November 29, 2007 the amount of $331.48 incurred in the prosecution of this case and abate all violations by removing all sheds for sale within 14 days of this hearing or a fine of $250 a day will be imposed until the violation is abated. The respondent must notify the code enforcement investigator when the violation has been abated within 24 hours in order to conduct a final inspection to confirm abatement. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Fourteen days to remove the sheds? MS. SCAVONE: Correct. MS. MACALISTER: May I -- am I allowed to comment on that? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: No. Do you want her to? Go ahead. MS. MACALISTER: Thank you, ma'am. We need longer than 14 days to consider the legal options of either appeal directly to the circuit court or perhaps to seek the $1,500 letter to bring back to the board. That would be my only comment at this point. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. MR. KELL Y: May I comment? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Sure. MR. KELL Y: Given the fact that we originally had a split decision on this, and it is on the borderline and it does need further interpretation, I would like the board to be lenient in the time frame to allow the respondent to possibly seek other alternatives. MR. PONTE: I think that sets a dangerous precedent. Any case that came before us, the person could -- the respondent could then say well, I'd like to seek a little more advice here, so whatever the time frame you've suggested isn't quite sufficient for me to get all of the information that I need for further support to further develop my case. That's a totally different situation. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm concerned about 14 days just Page 103 16' f1 j November 29,2007 to be able to find a place to move the sheds to legally -- MR. PONTE: It's not our problem. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- and remove them. I don't think it's enough time, personally. MR. PONTE: How many sheds are on the property? Didn't look like that many. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: There were quite a few in the pictures, I thought. MR. LEFEBVRE: I have to agree with Mr. Ponte. And the reason being is they did have an option already back in June when this letter was written, and the option was to spend the $1,500 and get a more formal result. And they didn't go forward, they waited until today and it's the end of November. And I think 14 days is a little bit short. I think maybe a little bit more time possibly to move them. But to go through the hoops to go with all the legal avenues, I think that would be extending it way too far. MR. KELLY: I believe it's absolutely reasonable to assume that they didn't decide to go that route, pay the $1,500 and get the interpretation was because they did have a very valid argument. And it was enough of an argument to sway half of this board the first time around. I think that 14 days is obviously too soon in order to move those sheds anyway, so I would agree with you there. But I would ask for maybe a little more time to try some kind of review process. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: They can always come back to us as well with extenuating circumstances. So -- are there any questions to the participants? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Ifnot, I'll close the public hearing again and move back to formulating a motion. MR. KELL Y: Can I take a stab at it? Page 104 16' A ~ """ November 29, 2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Sure. Oc, MR. KELLY: You guys can yell at me if you like. That the respondent pay operational costs of $331.48 within 30 days of the date of this hearing. Two, remove all sheds within 120 days or a fine of $250 a day will be imposed for each day thereafter the violation is not abated. And three, notify code enforcement within 24 hours of abatement. MR. PONTE: 120 days. These are portable sheds designed to be put up and taken down quickly. 120 days to take down a half dozen sheds, I can't go along with that. MR. LEFEBVRE: Yeah, I think 120 days is excessive. MR. MORGAN: I agree with 90 days. MR. KELLY: I'll amend my motion to 90 days for the removal of all sheds. MR. DEAN: I'll second that. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? MR. PONTE: Opposed. MS. ARNOLD: Can we hear the full order again? MR. KELLY: Pay op. costs of $331.48 within 30 days. To remove all sheds within 90 days or a fine of $250 per day until the violation is abated. And three, notify code enforcement within 24 hours of abatement. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And if in your legal process you find that that's not enough time, then you have recourse to come back to us and request. MS. MACALISTER: Absolutely. Thank you very much. Page 105 ; ~ A 3 November 29,2007 And thank you, Mr. L'Esperance. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The next case, Board of County Commissioners versus R.P.K. Enterprises of Bonita, Inc. MS. MARKU: This case is in reference to Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2007-121, Department Case No. 2007-070013. F or the record, the respondent is present. (All speakers were duly sworn.) MS. MARKU: The respondent and the board was sent a packet of evidence and I would like to enter the packet of evidence as Exhibit A. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Entertain a motion. MR. KELLY: Make a motion we accept. MR. PONTE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. MS. MARKU: Violation of Ordinances 04-41, Collier County Land Development Code as amended, Sections 10.02.06(B)(2)(A), 1O.02.06(B)(2)(D)(ix), 5.04.05(A)(I), 5.04.05(A)(2), and 2004-58, the Property Maintenance Code, Sections 16(2)(i) and 16(2)(j). Description of violation: Signs without proper permits and banner displayed without proper permits. Location/address where violation exists: 4295 Bonita Beach Road. Folio No. 24470640005. Name and address of owner/person in charge of violation location: R.P.K. Enterprises of Bonita, Incorporated. Attention: Jeffrey Mantz as registered agent, 27567 Grove Road, Bonita Springs, Page 106 - 16 f A ~ Novem13er ~9, 2001'" Florida, 34135. Date violation first observed: July 7th, 2007. Date owner/person in charge given notice the violation: August 30th, 2007. Date onlby which violation to be corrected: September 30th, 2007. Date of reinspection: October 2nd, 2007. Results of reinspection: Violation remains. At this time I would like to turn the case over to Code Enforcement Investigator Kitchell Snow. MR. SNOW: Good morning. Before we begin, I would like to submit an evidence packet with photographs. And it does have a letter in the back I would like your consideration on. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'll entertain a motion to accept Packet B for the County. MR. DEAN: Motion to accept Packet B. MR. PONTE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) MR. SNOW: For the record, the respondent has seen the photographs. I have discussed what exactly the evidence details. If you will look that it shows evidence that there were banners, there was legal signage. This property used to be Bonita Beach Bar and Grill. I guess the -- well, I'm sure the business has since left and a Page 107 (6 fA 3 November 29,2007 new owner moved in there, or a new business owner moved in there. He erected signs, illegal signs. He had banners. He didn't have any permits for anything. I attempted contact several times with him. I left door knockers, I left business cards. He never called me and I really didn't understand why. I attempted several times in the evening to go by and see them, I attempted in the morning, and I exhausted all avenues to try to get in touch with him. I issued a Notice of Violation. Once that was issued and the time expired, I had contact, various contacts with the respondent, Mr. Mantz, and he expressed to me he had the same problem with his tenant, that he wasn't paying his rent, he was not in compliance, wouldn't talk to him. And we were having this discussion, and he was currently trying to get him evicted and move on. But unfortunately the violations continued to remain, and that's why we're here today. The violations, most of them have since been abated. As the Notice of Violation states, we need temporary use permits for the banners that were displayed, and we'll discuss that and my recommendations. But the letter on the back talks about Mr. Mantz and some of the issues that he has in this issue. And the county's a little sympathetic with what happened, but still, the violations were there and the violations were there for quite some time. MR. LEFEBVRE: The first page states that there's a recommendation. Should that be pulled from -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Urn-hum. MR. LEFEBVRE: Let the record note that the recommendation, which is the first page of the packet, has been pulled. MR. SNOW: And the photographs are current yesterday. There's still a wall sign that has been painted over. We have discussed that. It needs to be painted in a workmanlike fashion, the same color of the structure. Page 108 16/J1 3 November 29, 2007~' He's indicated to me he's doing a lot of work on his own on the weekends and will take care of it as soon as he can. And again, we'll discuss that at a later time. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Snow, is that all you have? MR. SNOW: Ma'am, yes, ma'am, I'm clear. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Sir, would you like to speak? MR. MANTZ: Yes. My name is Jeff Mantz. My wife and I are the owner of that property under the corporation R.P .K. Enterprises. Last April the former owner of the business, Bonita Beach Grill sold the business, which we had no part of, to Midnight Enterprises, which was the corporate entity that took possession of the business. I executed a lease from them in April, and from the very start had difficulty with the tenant as far as collecting rent. I came by one Monday and found he had painted the building iridescent yellow and then had put -- later on put banners up over the old signs. Code violations came out, I tried to contact him a number of times. And having the lease, I had no right to go on the property and make the corrections myself. Everything -- we went from bad to worse. I finally had to hire an attorney to start eviction proceedings. And I think October 7th, I believe, or November 7th, he finally vacated the premises and then within 12 hours I went and removed the signs. His solution to the iridescent yellow building color was to paint it a better color, but to paint the name of the business on the side of the building. So at the same time I removed the banner, I used Kilz to spray over the old painted-on sign, with the intent I will paint the entire side of the building so it matches one color. As I said, I had no right to go on to the property until he vacated the premises, and so my hands were tied. But as soon as I could access the property, I took care of the problem. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions? Page 109 u\ A N~ember29,2007 MR. MORGAN: Mr. Snow, what's the present condition ofthe building? MR. SNOW: The building is vacated. The only-- MR. MORGAN: I mean, the exterior is-- MR. SNOW: The exterior still has, if you'll look on one of the photographs, it's -- looks like it's been whited out on the side where they had Shooters on. Currently that's the only thing here. There is some signage on the property, and we'll go over when I have recommendations about some of the things that we can do on this property, that he's going to have to do, because there is no tenant in there. And the code is very specific about signs and when they're allowed and what you're allowed to do with them. So we can discuss that. But to answer your question, the only thing that's left of the former business is that whiteout of Shooters. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions? MR. LEFEBVRE: Yeah, I guess a follow-up to that. So the way __ the status of it being painted in white trying to cover it, is that still a violation? MR. SNOW: Yes, sir. The code states in the property maintenance Code 2004-58, states if a wall sign is removed, it has to be painted in workmanlike fashion to cover any shadowing created by that removal. So once he paints that, then that violation will be abated. MR. LEFEBVRE: Which he has already stated that he's in the process, this was is a process to kill, or to take care of -- I don't know what color the lettering was -- MR. MANTZ: It was very dark. It was a brown on a very light beige building. So I felt the need to put a base coat over first. I used the Kilz. MR. LEFEBVRE: Right, it's almost like primer over a dark color of paint in your house. MR. MANTZ: Yes. But I'm probably going to need to paint the Page 11 0 !o~e~ber19, 2~7 entire wall because unless I can match exactly the old color -- MR. LEFEBVRE: Very unlikely you will. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: If not, I'll move to finding of fact. MR. LEFEBVRE: I'd like to make a motion that there is a violation. MR. PONTE: I'll second the motion. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (N 0 response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Would you like to give your recommendation, please. MR. SNOW: Yes, ma'am, I would. Madam Chair, I would like to read a definition for you from the sign code. When signs -- when a business is no longer there, and if it's got copy on it or doesn't have copy on it, it could be deemed an abandoned sign after 90 days. I would like to read this definition too because this is pertinent to my recommendations. It states: Sign Abandon. Any sign or sign structure expressly installed for the purpose of affixing a sign which bears no sign or copy for 90 consecutive days or more or for a period of 90 consecutive days or more, displays information which incorrectly identifies the business, owner, lessor or principal activity conducted on the site, or Page 111 pf!flr kl 16' ~ :; November 29,2007 which through lack of maintenance becomes illegible or nearly so or in a state of disrepair, signs displaying an Available for Lease or similar message or partially obliterated faces which do not identify a particular product, service or facility shall be deemed abandoned. And the important thing here is there is no copy. If you look on the photographs, there's no copy on them anymore. So I've discussed this with him and he's pretty sure he's going to have a tenant there within 90 days. But if not, then those signs have to come down. My recommendations are as follows: Obtain required permits for signs if attainable or remove within 90 days of the date of the hearing or a fine of$150 a day will be imposed until said signs are permitted or removed. If a wall sign is removed, paint facade in a workmanlike fashion to cover any shadowing created by the removal of said sign. The permit number is to be affixed to the said sign upon CO. This is about the temporary use permits and the banners. And we understand that the tenant was there, but he's also responsible as a property owner. Number two, obtain temporary use permit for the banner displayed on the property from 7/2/07 to 7/15/07 and from 7/17/07 to 7/30/07 within 14 days of the date of the hearing or a fine of$150 a day will be imposed until such time as the permit is obtained. After-the-fact permit fees of two times the amount of the normal permit are to apply. The respondent is to notify the code enforcement investigator when the violation has been abated in order to conduct a final inspection to confirm abatement. The respondent is to pay all operational costs in the amount of 273.28 incurred in the prosecution ofthis case within 30 days of the date of the hearing. MR. MANTZ: Can I speak? You know, the tenant is the one that applied for the sign. I had nothing to do with that at all and really had Page 112 16 I A N~~mber 29,2007 no way to control what he did. I guess I just really -- to go -- for me to have to go pull a permit for a sign that I never wanted to do to begin with, I wonder how fair that is. That's my only comment. MS. ARNOLD: Can I just speak to that for a second? It's -- the temporary use permit for banners are applicable to the business, so -- a part of why we generally ask for this type of a corrective action is that if the same business is there, they're not granted additional days beyond what the code already permits. In this case you've heard that that business that obtained the temporary use permit is no longer there. So to penalize the property owner for permits, after-the-fact permits, I think the county's going to withdraw that. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So the after-the-fact permits will be withdrawn. Entertain a motion? Or ask questions? MR. LEFEBVRE: A question regarding the sign removal within or after 90 days. Does that mean the pole and every -- it's the whole structure? MR. SNOW: Down to the ground. And the wall sign too. There's a wall sign up there, sir. So all signage that was permitted before, and I did research on the property, Bonita Beach Bar and Grill did have permits for those signs. Any time you make a change to any sign it requires a new permit. And even if they put them up and had a new tenant move in, they're going to have to repermit anything. The county's concern is it doesn't -- we wanted to make sure that it aesthetically keeps its same value and doesn't run in disrepair. And unfortunately it states 90, it's deemed abandoned and has to be brought to the ground. MR. MANTZ: My question would be, I have some very good tenants I'm going to be leasing it to, I'm very sure of. But with the state of economy, my concern is even if! can't find a tenant in 90 Page 113 I,'i': 16J "% - I' November 29,2007 days, to pull a very valuable, non-replaceable sign down, that's a rather harsh -- MR. LEFEBVRE: I guess that's what I'm asking, what would be __ is there any alternative? Can he put up a For Sale sign or For Lease sign? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: No, because that's what he read in the code, you couldn't. MR. MANTZ: I'll move my business in there before I'll pull a sign down and get a sign permit for the business. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's an alternative. MR. LEFEBVRE: I mean, because the cost, I would think, to remove a sign and to install a sign, if it's going to be four months, five months -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's why he took the time to read us the code before. He's kind of got his hands tied with that. MR. MANTZ: I don't believe that sign could ever be replaced under current codes. That building's been there for a long, long time. MR. SNOW: Well, it was permitted in 2005, so it's after the 2003 sign code, so it meets current code. I don't think that will be an issue. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Hopefully he can get a tenant in within 90 days. If not, he'll do it himself. MR. MANTZ: For sure. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions? MR. KELLY: One question, Mr. Snow. Does that include the one on the parapet wall or the mansard as well? MR. SNOW: Yes, sir. All the signage has to come, so -- MR. MANTZ: That will be done, I think, by the end ofthis weekend. That looks terrible. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions? MR. LEFEBVRE: I make a motion to accept the county's recommendation with the removal of the one section with the after-the-fact permits. Page 114 16' A NoJmber 29, 2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear a second? MR. MORGAN: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) MR. MANTZ: Thank you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. And Board of County Commissioners versus Horse Creek Partners. (All speakers were duly sworn.) MS. MARKU: This is in reference to Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2007-122, Department Case No. 2005-090022. F or the record, the respondent is present. The respondent and the board was sent a packet of evidence and I would like to enter the packet of evidence as Exhibit A. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Entertain a motion. MR. KELL Y: I'll make a motion to accept it. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. Page 115 Ji}5T i~ ~ Novemoer 29, 2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. MS. MARKU: Violation of Ordinance 04-41 as amended, the Land Development Code, Sections 9.03.03(D)(I)(d), 9.03.03(D)(2)(a) plus (b), 9.03.03(D)(3)(c), 9.03.03(D)(5), 10.02.06(B)(2)(a), and 1 0.02.06(B)(2)( d)(ix). Description of violation: Nonconforming sign erected prior to 1991 and exists beyond the operation schedule regarding conformity to current code and not properly maintained according to code. Location/address where violation exists: 102 Palm River Boulevard. Folio No. 65220000100. Name and address of person/owner person in charge of violation location: Horse Creek Partners, Ltd, Alan T. Schiffman as registered agent, 870 Illth Avenue North, Naples, Florida, 34108. Date violation first observed: August 25th, 2005. Date owner/person in charge given Notice of Violation: October 1st, 2007. Date on/by which violation to be corrected: October 19th, 2007. Date of reinspect ion. October 21st, 2007. Results of reinspection: Violation remains. At this time, I would like to turn the case over to Code Enforcement Investigator Kitchell Snow. MR. SNOW: Please excuse me, Madam Chair. I haven't showed the photographs of what I've got, so I will need to show those to the respondent before we proceed. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. MR. SNOW: I would assume you're looking through my -- MS. ARNOLD: You have to ask -- MR. SNOW: Oh. Could you -- I would like to submit as evidence. I'm sorry. I have photographs and some other evidence. I would like to submit that, please. MR. KELLY: Are we making a motion then to accept all of it at once, then? Page 116 ~1'~6IA 3 November 29,2007 .- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yeah. MR. KELL Y: I make a motion to accept. MR. PONTE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) MR. SNOW: I'll give you all time. This has been a very, very long running case. It concerns a nonconforming sign. I believe we all probably know, it's on Immokalee Road, the Fairways Motel. I think we've all seen it. I've received numerous complaints from citizens from the Palm River homeowners association concerning this sign. If you look at the first page I have, that's -- basically we're talking about the sign, where it's located. That X is where the sign is. And we've heard this case before, so. The photographs are taken yesterday of the sign. As you notice, the sign has a shroud cover on it, which is illegal. It's got no panels in it, I guess they were blown out in the last hurricane. It does look a little better than it has in the past, but it still is not what it should be. If you look at the photographs, the concern about this sign is A, it's too large, it has never been permitted that we know of, and it is a nonconforming sign. And according to code, a nonconforming sign has to be brought up to code by February 1st of2003. I have that listed in your packet. I've also included in your packet a letter. There's been several meetings on this to try to find a solution for the property owners. We Page 117 1'6 I ~ov~er 29,2007 are very concerned about the businesses and how they're maintained and helping them find solutions to their problems. Unfortunately in this case there's been several attempts and variances and everything, meetings, that have gone on since 2005. I want to draw your attention to a letter from Susan Istenes that is one ofthe sole people within code enforcement, as we talked earlier, or as you heard earlier, that is allowed to interpret code. She's the VOIce. And there was a meeting, as you can see. The meeting attendees were zoning and land development review, Susan Istenes, Code Enforcement Director Michelle Arnold, Marlene Serrano, my supervisor, County Attorneys Jeff Wright, JeffKlatzkow, and the principal planner Nancy Gundlach. And I will read this for you: The primary purpose -- and this is a synopsis of the meeting that was held. The primary purpose of this meeting was to discuss the possibility of how the sign might be made to be a legal sign that is in conformance with the Collier County Land Development Code, LDC. The existing sign must be removed. Must be removed. Because it is not compliant with the Land Development Code. Susan Istenes suggested the parking facilities easement site the existing sign mostly resides on be rezoned to the same R T, or Residential Tourist, as the land that the motel is located. Once the rezoning is accomplished, the petitioner could seek a variance for the dimensional sign requirements such as height and area. If, if, the variance is granted by the Collier County Board of Commissioners, then the petitioner could build a new sign and locate it on the same site as the parking facilities easement. I've also included another synopsis. And this is from Nancy Gundlach, an e-mail from her. I will let you all read this one, it's rather lengthy. It talks about some other things that are involved, how long the case has drawn out, what has happened in the case. Page 118 ",,,.. u .. cr, II II'!."., , .' L .,~.'. \ . h ~./ November 29, 2007 This is a nonconforming sign. It has been allowed to exist far too long. In a large process, which we're talking about variance applications, I don't know if you're familiar with how this goes, but basically what happens is you attend a pre-ap meeting. All the people that are involved with this within the county such as landscape, sign, principal planners, everyone attends that meeting. The respondent attends that meeting. They submit for this. It has to go to all the different departments. Once that goes to the different departments, they usually receive a rejection letter in 30 days, that's what we hope. Code stipulates it's got to be quicker than that, but 30 days. Once that goes through, the respondent has six months to submit the correction for that. So technically, this could keep running on and running on and running -- and that's what has happened in the past. This is a nonconforming sign, nonconforming structure that's been allowed to exist for far too long. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is that all you have, Mr.-- MR. SNOW: Yes, ma'am. MR. HANCOCK: It's not good morning. Good afternoon, Madam Chair, members of the code enforcement board. My name is Tim Hancock with Davidson Engineering. I'm here on behalf of Steven Mirowitz, the owner of Fairways Resort. Also with us is Ms. Judy Battista, the manager of the property. And as previously submitted in accordance with a code enforcement action that you actually withdrew this morning as your first action of business, we do have authorization from Horse Creek Partners to represent them in this matter. The subject property is owned by Horse Creek Partners and Fairways Resort as a perpetual right to use the parcel for parking to support the resort, and also has authority granted by the property owner to erect and maintain a sign on the property. Page 119 16'j A 3 November 29,2007 The sign in questions is 41 years old. I'm happy to say, it predates me. Not by much, but it predates me. It's been in continuous use during that time. This property has never fallen out of use, never been vacant. It's operated continuously for 41 years. The current condition of the sign being covered with a temporary banner is a leftover gift from Hurricane Wilma in September of2005. Wilma blew out the face of the sign into two pieces, making it impossible to just simply put it back. This is where the tale of woe begins for Mr. Mirowitz, who has owned the property for nearly 10 years. Had the replacement of those panels occurred, we might not even be here today, despite the fact that the sign does not comply with the current code. We recognize that. This item was heard in May of this year by this board, who approved a stipulated settlement agreement that the petitioner was to pursue with all diligence a variance for the sign, and upon granting of that variance, should it be granted, a new sign that met current regulations would be constructed. We appreciated that consideration. That was May of 2007. We had the pre-application for that variance in May of 2006, a year prior. We filed for that variance in September of2006. Contrary to what Mr. Snow placed into the record, which is patently false, it did not take us six months to respond to what the county put forth as comments, it took the county six months to give us comments on our variance application. The comment letter is dated in April of 2007. So no, it wasn't six months for us to respond. We received it in April, 2007. We had a hearing before you in May of2007, and in an effort to resubmit -- and let me tell you why it took six months. The original planner was Carolina Valera. She was moved to growth management. Somehow it fell between the cracks. This is not a reflection on Nancy Gundlach at all. But Nancy picked it up and we began getting activity 16 '" 'A i ,t4/~ Novem~r 29,2007 on it. What came out of that after our meeting in May is in June we had several e-mails and several meetings with county staff, and Mr. Snow attended at least one of them that I attended and maybe two of them, where we found out or were informed by planning staff that a variance was not possible. The variance could be granted for, examples, reductions in measurements or setbacks. But in this case, the small strip in front of Fairways Resort that the sign is situated on is zoned RSF-3, which is a single-family zoning district. It's a leftover piece. We don't know how this happened. As a matter of fact, right across the driveway, if you look at the pictures, you'll see a LaPlaya sign. It also is an off-premise sign located in RSF-3 zoning-- MR. SNOW: Just for the record, that has no bearing on this case. That has nothing to do with the sign we're talking about. I object to that testimony. MR. HANCOCK: Thank you. It is recognized by us and the county it was permitted in error. So it's not a precedent, we understand that. But this piece is RSF-3. So after agreeing to pursue a variance, after incurring the cost of applying for a variance and doing everything you need to do to go through the variance process, we're told sorry, variance is not an option. So in July of this year, we're told you have to rezone the property. That's a pretty significant step. The property is 1.2 acres, plus or minus. The cost is going to be $10,000 plus to rezone it, at which point we haven't even begun to get a sign permitted and built. But Mr. Mirowitz has decided, because of the value ofthe sign to the business long-term, quite frankly because the property sits well off the road, the sign is responsible for a significant amount of business. Page 121 ~ 16' ~NoJinber 29,2007 Without it the disadvantages would be too great. We had a pre-application meeting yesterday with staff on a rezone for the property. This is starting to feel like the movie Groundhog Day. In May of last year we had a pre-application for a variance, which was supposed to help solve this problem, and we got three-quarters of the way down the road and got turned back. Here we are again with pre-application conference number two, all ofthis costing Mr. Mirowitz money and time. Our goal simply is to do whatever is necessary to allow us to replace the existing sign with a sign of lesser size that is more reflective of the current sign code. We mayor may not seek variances on the permitted height in conjunction with that rezone, but we have every intent to continue with this rezone in order to effectively replace the sign with something that is approved by the board. We have initiated that process. Now that we've literally wasted the last 12 to 13 months on the issue of a variance, we're going back to start and going with a rezone. What we're asking you to consider today in your action is that -- the staff recommendation, I believe, is for just complete removal of the sign within 120 days. Ifwe had the property rezoned and went to apply for a building permit for a sign, we'd be lucky to get it in 120 days. So in effect what staff is saying is four months from now take the sign down, and if it takes you another eight, nine months to get a new sign, tough nuts. This property relies on that sign to a degree. And if I could ask to enter into the record as Exhibit B -- and I brought copies for everybody so you don't have to share. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Entertain a motion. MR. DEAN: Motion to accept Exhibit B from respondent. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? Page 122 16 I ~oveler 29,2007 MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) MR. HANCOCK: Unlike many ofthe cases you've heard today where somebody executed an action that resulted in a code enforcement violation, all Mr. Mirowitz and Ms. Battista are doing is running an existing resort that's been there for 41 years. What I'm providing you is, we have the fortune of being able to tell you exactly how valuable that sign is and why we would like relief from the 120 days. When a person checks into the motel, they're given a card. We want to know how did you find out about us. Well, it turns out that somewhere between eight percent and 15 percent of all people coming into the resort notice the sign. They saw the sign and they turned in. And 10 and behold, we had guests. That has been annual revenue impact of somewhere between 50 and $72,000 a year if that sign just disappears. So ifMr. Mirowitz seems somewhat obstinate in his position of not wanting to just simply remove the sign and roll the dice in the meantime, I think that is a clear exhibit of why he's taken that position. And again, our position is not to keep the existing sign. We want to replace it. But it's taken almost a year for us to find the vehicle in order to do that. And again, I don't mean to cast aspersions with Mr. Snow, he has worked with us where he can work with us. But I think, as Mr. Snow will tell you, we sat in a meeting with a lot of people scratching their Page 123 161ft J \ '7 Nevember 29,2007 heads on this very issue, on, gee, what is the solution, what is the vehicle, how can this happen. The exhibits attached to that cover letter basically show you the difference between where that existing sign is located, which is a green arrow on Page 2, and where, if we were required to erect the sign on the RT-zoned parcel, is the red arrow. The difference here is a difference of visibility when you're coming down Immokalee Road from the Interstate, which is the vast majority of folks who use the property, of over 1,000 feet when you can see a sign versus less than 100 feet when it would become visible. And that's why we feel that the simple removal ofthe sign, irrespective of the processes that we've been told to go through and then road blocked and then asked to go through again, is not appropriate. What we would request is we have no problem with there being a time frame placed on the rezone that is reasonable. I've been doing this for 20 years. Currently a rezone takes a minimum of nine months, realistically, 12 months to get through the process. Subsequent to the rezone, and if there are variances required, we would then companion with the rezone, a sign will have to be permitted. Obviously we can't permit the sign before the zoning is done. We can design it, we can be ready to go, we can be ready to put a sign permit in, and that can take 30 to 60 days for a sign permit. I know it is difficult to stand here and ask you to allow something to sit out there that causes Mr. Snow to receive phone calls from folks for another year. What we hope to demonstrate to you is that the fiscal impact of the removal of that sign, the fact that it's been in place for 41 years and was not in essence an active code violation enacted by the property owner. And furthermore, that they have spent considerable time and money over the last 13, 15 months in trying to follow a course of action provided us by the county planning staff and were then turned Page 124 16' A 3 November 29,2007 back should not count against us in looking at a window of opportunity to make this correct. The last item I want to request is we paid administrative costs the last time we were before you. That particular violation was actually withdrawn this morning. And ifthere's any consideration of the application of paid administrative costs on a Notice of Violation that was withdrawn, we'd appreciate that. In the overall scheme ofthings that's a small issue, but it's something I wanted to ask, because once you close the public hearing we are at your mercy. With that, I'm going to ask Mr. Mirowitz ifthere's anything else he would like to add to the testimony provided, with your permission. And beyond that, that's the extent of what we have to present here today. MR. MIROWITZ: I suppose the only other thing I'd like to add to the testimony is the figures on the revenue dollars. If somebody returns the following year, we count them as a repeat guest, so it's quite possible that somebody came to the motel from the sign the first year and then followed up the subsequent years as a repeat guest, which would not be reflected in these figures. And that's about it, unless anybody has any questions. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I don't have any questions. I do have one comment. And I don't know if it's going to take me offthis case or not. But I used to live in Cocohatchee River Estates behind Palm River back in '74, and the sign was there at the time. I just know it was there. MS. ARNOLD: I don't think I was sworn, can I -- (Speaker duly sworn.) MS. ARNOLD: I just wanted to add I don't believe this case -- well, I know the case isn't about the existence of this particular sign for 41 years, which happens to be younger than me. MR. HANCOCK: But I look much older. MS. BARNETT: I just told a story. I'm older than the sign. Page 125 16ft\ 'X , N~ember29,2007 MS. ARNOLD: It's merely regarding the fact that it did exist prior to 1991, and the sign code -- or the sign code portion of the Land Development Code requires all signs that existed prior to that date that did not conform to the LDC need to be brought into conformance. So I just wanted to clarify what the case before you is about. MR. HANCOCK: And while we don't dispute any of those points, the truth is as a business owner who's busy operating his business, when the code was changed in '91, a light didn't go off in Mr. Mirowitz's head that said, hey, I've got to replace my sign. Sometimes it takes a code enforcement violation to bring this to their attention. MS. ARNOLD: Right. I just merely say that for clarification, because I think it was kind of being swung off track a little bit. And, you know, staffwill give you our recommendation, but obviously it's up to the board to grant whatever time frame you find. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have a question for Michelle in regards to the fact that we did withdraw the previous case and they did pay those charges. MS. ARNOLD: Right. What happened was we withdrew the Code Enforcement Board case and -- the code department case is the same case. We're not going to charge an additional operational cost. In fact, because they've already paid there's no recommendation to charge operational costs for this case. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So rather than refund, we're just not charging any additional. MS. ARNOLD: Right. Well, it's the same -- unfortunately because we have a separate number for the Code Enforcement Board cases, the code case is still the same and -- yeah, that's not an issue. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I just needed clarification on that. Any other questions? MR. SNOW: If! may add. Sir, when was your original variance submitted, Mr. Hancock? Page 126 16 r A Nolmber 29,2007 MR. HANCOCK: Variance was submitted in September of2006. MR. SNOW: I'm not going to introduce this as evidence because we did this in the last hearing, but we have a letter from -- to Davidson Engineering, to Mr. Hancock, a letter that talks about their variance, and it's a reply letter to them, so it didn't take the county six months. This is dated January 24th. So he and I differ on the dates about who was responsible. I don't think that's the issue. I think the issue here is there's a nonconforming sign on the property, it's been there a long time, we need to find a solution. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, if not, I'll close the public hearing and move to finding of fact. Discussion? MR. KELLY: Well, I think the respondent admitted that there was a violation, so I make a motion that a violation does exist. MR. DEAN: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Recommendation from the county? MR. SNOW: Yes, ma'am. Madam Chair, the CEB orders the respondent to, number one, remove the nonconforming off-premise sign and structure within 120 days of the date of the hearing or a fine Page 127 16' A 3 November 29, 2007 of$150 a day will be imposed until such time as the sign is removed. The respondent must notify the code enforcement investigator within 24 hours that the violation has been abated in order to conduct a final inspection to confirm abatement. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Discussion amongst the board? MR. KELL Y: I believe that -- I don't think the county would have a problem extending the time frame. I just was a little concerned that I didn't want to speak too far out without, you know, hearing some other comments. But maybe a year. The respondent said nine months would be on the good end, so maybe a year to get this thing taken care of. I'd like to hear other people's opinion. MR. LEFEBVRE: Again, what do you feel would be a time frame for rezone and a variance? MR. HANCOCK: Because this rezone hopefully is on the simple side, since there's no structures involved, I think we're looking at a minimum of nine months from start to completion of the rezone. MR. LEFEBVRE: Of the rezone. And then from there you'd have to get a variance; is that correct? MR. HANCOCK: Well, the variance, we would agree to run any variances as companion items of the rezone, and rather then tacking them on the end. You can do that and they hear both items on the same day. So if there are any variances requested, we'd run them companion with the rezone, because without the rezone we can't request a vanance. And then the only thing left would be to pull a permit on the sign. It would be up to us to take the risk of getting the sign design and everything done while the rezone is going on so that the permit could go in shortly thereafter. And sign permits should be issued within 30 days, but sometimes you get an electrical comment and it kicks you to maybe days for a permit. Page 128 is rA 3 November 29, 2007 MR. LEFEBVRE: And submittal of the sign permit could not be done until the rezone and until the variance has been accepted, correct? MR. HANCOCK: Based upon my experience with your review staff, that is correct. MR. LEFEBVRE: I think a year would be appropriate. So that way they don't have to come in front of us again. MR. PONTE: I agree with that. I think that's right. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I agree also. I have a tendency to agree with that as well, due to the fact that they've already gone through one mitigating situation. I think we need to give them some leniency and try to help them along. And the fact that the sign has existed as long as it has and hasn't really caused any issues, I don't think it's going to hurt anybody to stay there that length of time. I know it's not in conformance, but -- and you want to get it fixed. But I -- this is kind of the way we're leaning -- MR. WRIGHT: I just want to add something. You're probably going to address this without my comment, but neither the variance nor the rezone are guaranteed. So I would just ask that your order reflect the possibility that it would be denied. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: If it's denied then they have 30 days to get a new sign permitted. I would think that would -- MR. KELLY: Whatever. I mean, if you don't get it within 12 months, then you'll have to tear it down and that's the end of it. MR. LEFEBVRE: I guess that wasn't put in there, correct? MR. KELLY: Well, it's 12 months to either remove -- it's 12 months to remove the sign or to get -- either way, they're going to have to remove the sign and put a new one. So, I mean, 12 months to remove the sign, period. MR. HANCOCK: For the record, the applicant understands that the time period is the time period. Period. No exceptions. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Want to take a stab at it? Page 129 16 I NJember 29,2007 MR. KELLY: Sure. Make a motion that in this case the respondent has 12 months to remove the sign and abate the violation. And number two, notify code enforcement within 24 hours of abatement. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Ifhe doesn't do it in 12 months, what's the fine? MR. KELLY: Fine of$150 a day for each day the sign -- or the violation is not abated. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Operating costs were already paid. MR. DEAN: I'll second that motion. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. MR. HANCOCK: I thank you. MR. SNOW: Thank you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It's that time. MS. ARNOLD: Before we break? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes. MS. ARNOLD: There has been one other request. We have on the agenda Item 5- B- 7, which is an imposition of fines. And the respondent -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Francois? MS. ARNOLD: Yeah. And they're here and they're requesting to Page 130 16'1 ~'1~ Novemt?er 29,2007 be heard before lunch break. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Because they have been so considerate to sit through all this, we'll be glad to hear them. MR. WHITE: Just for the record, Madam Chair, we have no objection. (Speakers were duly sworn.) MS. ARNOLD: It's my turn. I'm sitting here. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It's been a long morning. MS. ARNOLD: It's been a long morning. This is Board of County Commissioners versus Joseph Ferio Francois. And this case was heard by the Board of County Commissioners -- I mean, sorry, Code Enforcement Board on October 26th, 2006. The finding of fact that was entered into the record is attached for your review. On that date the respondent was found in violation and ordered to comply in accordance with the order. Compliance has not been met. This particular case was a structure that had extensive fire damage, and the respondent is attempting or had been attempting to get a building permit to correct the damage and to put the building in operational. That has not occurred. As a result, fines have accrued at a rate of $250 per day for the period between October 27th, 2007 through November 29th, today, for 33 days, for a total of $8,250. Additionally, operational costs of $319.79 cents have not yet been paid. So we're asking at this time for fines to be imposed in the amount of$8,569.79. Before the respondent is able to have their opportunity to speak, the board's order directed them to obtain building permits and COs within a year, and if they didn't comply, that the fines would accrue. We have since this time been authorizing the county to consider removal of structures. And I think that this has been going on for some time, and the county is going to request an amendment to your order, Page 131 ]"" ,~- A I, i~-' ~ November1'9,2007 which -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We've already been through that so we know we can do it. MS. ARNOLD: Yes, absolutely. To consider an alternate to the abatement. But before we discuss that any further, I think the respondent should have an opportunity to speak to why they haven't obtained compliance at this time. MR. BRUGGER: My name is John Brugger. I'm an attorney who was retained back in July to represent Dr. Francois in moving forward with his progress on this building. He acquired the building back in 2005, and as Michelle noted, it had roof damage. There was a fire damage. He had made application to the county for a building permit for remodeling, repairing the building. The building was found structurally sound except for the roof. The permits, to the best of my knowledge, have been approved except for a condition that an SDP had to be obtained for the building. At the time Dr. Francois looked into, because it was the Immokalee planning district, to getting an SIP. He had retained Blair Foley, a local engineer, to meet with the county. They actually held a meeting on May 4th of 2006, at which time it was determined that an SDP should be obtained. Dr. Francois being a busy practitioner, turned things over to the engineer. I've got a letter here. I've got a couple letters which I'd like to enter into evidence, one of which is a letter from-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Excuse me one moment, I need to have that accepted as an evidence packet. MR. KELL Y: I make a motion to accept the evidence. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. Page 132 16 l,f1 '2 . ~ /, November 29,2007 MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) MR. BRUGGER: Dr. Francois, being a professional, hired a professional to undertake the work for him and was relying on him. I've got a letter here that I'm passing out, dated October 25th, 2006, in which Mr. Foley acknowledges that he was retained back in April to undertake this work. He's had a number of meetings with different planning consultants, an architect, et cetera, to move forward, and that the work should be completed in 30 to 60 days, taking into consideration that the holidays were ahead and you know. So Dr. Francois thought something early 2007 would be the result. He made a number of phone calls to the engineer, got no response. And in July of2007 he came in and discussed with me what he had to do to move this matter forward because he wasn't getting a response from his engineer. I do quite a bit of development work for a number of clients and understood the procedure and how things had to move along. I attempted to contact Mr. Foley several times by telephone, got no response. I think he was out of town for a period of time. I finally wrote a letter to him demanding -- and this was in, I'd say, late July -- demanding a response, because Dr. Francois had signed an agreement with him for engineering services, had paid the retainer fees and undertaken what he was supposed to do. We then received in response to that, Mr. Foley put together a summation of where he stood. We had a meeting on August 24th of 2007, at which time he assured me that he thought he could get this Page 133 16 , A 3 November 29, 2007 done in the next 30 to 60 days, but he needed some things accomplished. One of which, and I don't know the reason, but there were architectural renderings required, they had not been submitted to him. I immediately brought in an architect. We got renderings done, turned over to Mr. Foley, and in -- by mid-October he returned all the documents to me for review before they were submitted. At the time he gave them to me, I noted a concern I had on a survey that was included. It turned out that a portion of this building, which had stood there for years, encroached eight feet onto adjoining property . And I went back to the individuals, I told them that that encroachment is going to have to be removed. The county is not going to grant a variance to allow you to hold eight feet of your building on an adjoining property. When we noted that, I returned it to J.D. Allen, who was the architect. He was out oftown for two weeks. Mr. Allen had to correct the renderings on the building to remove the footprint because the materials that had been provided to him showed that the building was all within the boundaries of the property. That was accomplished as of about two weeks ago. Items were returned to Mr. Foley, and Mr. Foley has promised, as he has in the past, that we would have things ready to file before Christmas. Based upon his past history, I can't guarantee that will happen. But I can't agree with, you know, Dr. Francois has been pursuing this diligently. I can't agree with the county's position on tearing the building down. He's got over $20,000 invested in engineering fees, survey fees, architect fees, and he was relying on the professionals who were doing the work for him. Also, I would like to note, my understanding from Dr. Francois was that the county had agreed to a fine of $50 a day, not $250 at the prior hearing. Page 134 16 I~NovAber~9 2007 , We understand we're under a time gun, and we're pushing to get it accomplished. Do you have any comment to add? MS. ARNOLD: I don't know -- the order that I'm reading says 250 per day. So I don't know what Mr. Francois is referring to. MR. LETOURNEAU: We have a stipulated agreement also that was signed agreeing to a $250 a day fine. DR. FRANCOIS: How much was it, 250 or-- MR. LETOURNEAU: Two-fifty. DR. FRANCOIS: Because I was under the impression it was $50, that's what, you know, I heard that day, so-- MR. BRUGGER: I wasn't present, so if he signed it, I guess it is 250 a day. MS. ARNOLD: Yeah, it says 250. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I don't recall us changing it. MS. ARNOLD: The only way it would have been changed if there was an amendment to the order to change that amount. Because the stipulation does says 250 and the board's order says 250. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Jeff, do you have anything to add? MR. LETOURNEAU: Yes. They tried to acquire a permit to get this structure fixed up back in June 16th of2005. They haven't taken any action on this permit since the last action on this thing was May of 2006. So that's 18 months this thing has been sitting here without any action by the owner. I'd like to submit as evidence a note from the fire inspector declaring this structure a dangerous structure, which I agree with, because, from what the pictures we got yesterday, it appears that possible homeless people are living in this right now and who knows what else is going on. It's on the Main Street of!mmokalee. It's just a total blight to the whole city. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: You're going to add the pictures Page 135 161 A 3 November 29,2007 in with your packet too, please. MR. LETOURNEAU: Yes. What I'll do is this will be County Exhibit A. I'll drop off a copy to the respondent here. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: May I have a motion to -- MR. DEAN: Motion to accept A. MR. MORGAN: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. MR. LETOURNEAU: This is the fire inspector's note. I've only got one set of pictures right here, so I'll let them take a look at it, see if they have any objection to these pictures being submitted as evidence. MR. BRUGGER: I guess my only comment is as part ofthe building permit, we have had structural engineers look at the building and the building has been found to be structurally safe. The fire department has passed the permit application. The only thing holding up the permit approval, to my understanding, is the fact that the SDP process had to be undertaken. We've got copies of the documents here, as of April 14th, where they respond to all the comments of the building department. And the only condition left undone is the SDP, which as I explained, we shortly hope to apply for. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is this going to be Packet B for the county, please? I need to make a motion. MR. DEAN: I'll make a motion to accept Packet B. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I have a second? MR. DEAN: A was in, this is B. Page 136 I~ 16 I /' '1'~ Novembe'f29,2007 MS. MARKU: A is the exhibit that-- MR. DEAN: I've got A in my hand -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Two different groups. MR. DEAN: That's A, that's B. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have a motion, and do I have a second? MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The original application, though, that was approved, was back in '06, correct? MR. BRUGGER: The original agreement, the stipulation with the board here? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: You said that you had gone through planning and that you had to do an SDP. That was back in '06, was that not? MR. BRUGGER: Yes, ma'am. April 13, 2006 was the last letter from the county setting forth the final requirements to issue the building permit. And the final requirement was that an SDP would be required. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Because I'm wondering with the roof being open how much wear has been added to the building structure. MR. BRUGGER: We've actually had a structural engineer out Page 13 7 1~ I A 3 November 29,2007 there within the last 60 days as a part of the process because I said before I get involved I want to make sure that the building could be structurally sound, are we wasting our time and money here. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's pertinent, thank you. MR. BRUGGER: I guess our request would be if it would be possible to grant -- it's going to take -- if in fact Mr. Foley gets this application completed, the engineering work that has to be done, I've done everything I can, the architect has done his -- if we can get an application in within 45 days, because I can't guarantee with the holidays that he's going to get done when I've been pushing him all along. After that I would assume it's going to take six months for the county to comment and approve an SDP, at which time I don't know where the county would stand on the building permit, whether there have been code modification that have to be brought up. But I would request a reduction in the daily fine while this process continues. Dr. Francois has invested a lot oftime and money in the engineering and has been the unfortunate recipient of poor consultation with his professionals. MR. LETOURNEAU: I would just like to point out again that it's been 18 months since anything's been done on this property, that they've tried to move forward on anything on this property. I can take into consideration that they had some problems with the people they hired, but if I had a daily fine hanging over my head, I would think I would look into other -- MR. BRUGGER: I think there's been several problems. One is Dr. Francois is sort of a quiet individual, and I think that the engineers, I've found, respond to who's yelling at them the loudest and who needs the work done. And he received the letter, sat back and trusted the deadlines that he was provided. It was only when I became involved and start raising Cain that progress started to progress. In addition, in the time frame -- I can understand what happened Page 138 16 i "- ii c November 29, 2007 with Mr. Foley, I'm certain, because I'm a development attorney, Lee County had a jump in impact fees that took effect in January of 2007, so he probably put aside other work to get his Lee County developers in. And then Collier County has the same thing occurring now, if you don't have an application in before January, 2006, your impact fees are going up. And poor Dr. Francois gets shuffled to the side unless somebody is riding the engineer hard. MR. LETOURNEAU: One more point I'd like to make is this fire occurred on May 24th, 2003, so this building has been sitting out on Main Street Immokalee for approximately four and a half years in this condition. MR. DEAN: Can I ask what the use of that building was? What was there? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It was a restaurant. MR. DEAN: Restaurant? Still is? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: No, it's empty -- DR. FRANCOIS: It was a grocery store -- MR. LEFEBVRE: Grocery store. MR. DEAN: It's a grocery store now? MR. LETOURNEAU: I thought it was some type of convenience store, wasn't it? MR. PONTE: Beer, cigarettes, groceries. MR. MORGAN: Make sure somebody isn't living there. Jeff, what does the interior look like? MR. LETOURNEAU: It's totally gutted -- you know -- MR. MORGAN: Inside? MR. LETOURNEAU: Inside it's been burnt. MR. MORGAN: Is there any structural members inside that's been damaged? MR. LETOURNEAU: Yeah, the whole inside's pretty much burnt -- MR. MORGAN: I mean, supporting the roof or rafters or trusses Page 139 C,' ~J,' A 1 :,. . ,f' . i1 ,"'" ' ~L1) il i .:' November 29,2007 or -- MR. LETOURNEAU: I think that the hold-up they had was that when they went to submit this permit that more than 40 percent of it was destroyed by the fire, if that gives you any indication. That's why the hold-up was, they had to get the site dev -- no, that's -- DR. FRANCOIS: Actually, no. Only the roof was damaged. It's a block building. MS. HART: My name is Jacqueline Hart, for the record. Because once it's 40 or close to 50 percent, then they would require you to do just actually more than that, pretty much tear down the building. But it was not 40 percent damaged. And just for the record, Dr. Francois obtained the property of 2005. He assumed the responsibility, or the headache, with the property. So he's trying his best to get this accomplished. And when we applied for the permit, the permit was for the repair of the damage -- the fire damage; however, during the permitting review process, that's when they realized that an SDP or an SIP was required in order to pursue the permit. And that's why the hold-up. But everything has been approved on the permitting process side of it. I just wanted to clear it up. MR. LETOURNEAU: Everything hasn't been approved, otherwise it would have been issued. MS. HART: It's just waiting for the SDP, Jeff. MR. LETOURNEAU: Eighteen months. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Jeff, have you actually been inside? MR. LETOURNEAU: No, I haven't been inside. I've just -- you can see through like the cracks of the windows and stuffwhat's going on. MR. BRUGGER: It's been boarded up to prevent people-- MR. LETOURNEAU: It has been boarded, yes. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: You say it's been boarded up, so Page 140 i61A 3 November 29,2007 you can't see through the windows. MR. DEAN: So you can't get in. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Any other questions? MR. BRUGGER: Again, I feel he's very close to being able to make the application for the SDP, and he was just too passive in the previous, you know, pursuit of it, having turned it over to other people to handle it for him. He has paid their fees, everything's been accomplished. I would request a little leniency, and give him a little bit more time. Certainly not go to the extreme of tearing the building down. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Any other questions from the board? (No response.) MR. LEFEBVRE: I just have a comment. Again, it's been going on for 18 months. This building has had a fire in 2003. Again, four and a half years. I understand that the respondent took possession ofthis building in 2005. But I feel that, without the pun, but we need to keep his feet to the fire and make sure that this property is repaired and repaired in a timely fashion. And I don't feel that he has taken responsibility and kept on this and made sure that if you hire professionals, you can fire them if they're not doing their job. And I feel that hasn't been the case. He hasn't looked at this as a priority. And he needs to do that. And by keeping the fine as is and running, when everything is said and done and the permits are issued and the property comes into compliance, then he can come back to us. But I feel that it's still important to keep these fines as is and runnmg. MR. BRUGGER: I understand your feeling, but I'd -- when we talked about replacement when Dr. Francois contacted me back in July, I looked at the issues and called some other engineers I talked to, they couldn't fit in commencing it in their schedule for another three Page 141 J.bi November 29,2007 months. So I made the decision that the quickest way to finalize the matter was to keep pursuing it with the existing professionals, simply because the other people wouldn't fit it into their schedule for an extended period. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Are there any other comments, questions? If not, I'm going to close -- Michelle? MS. ARNOLD: I just wanted to kind ofsurnmarize. There is the request to impose fines at a rate of 250 per day. You have a couple of requests on the table, one of which is -- I think I heard was to reduce the fines to $50 per day and grant additional time to come into compliance, and the other one was to abate the -- or modify the order as well, if you're going to modify to give additional time to give the option to the county to remove the structure. So those are all the things that you have on the table for consideration. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: A, B or C. Okay. At this time I'm going to close the public hearing and go to the board. And as Michelle just explained, we have three options. MR. PONTE: Well, there's a fourth, isn't there? The fourth one is that when we modify then we could also modify and give extended time for the demolition. I agree with Gerald, that the fining should continue just as is, but I have some feeling -- sympathy with the fact that $20,000 has been invested here already and that to tear down the building at the end of having invested $20,000 is not only counterproductive, it doesn't make very much sense. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We don't have to grant the modification. MR. PONTE: So that we -- I understand that. So that we could extend the time with the fine running at 250 per day until such time as the permits are all received and in hand, and perhaps that's only 60 or 90 days from now. And then come back and apply for reduction, if things are stalled. Page 142 '''If'I' Q ~f '_f' " (,4J'~ ""1" "'C).. tI', .., ~overnb~29,2007 But to say okay, it's time, the clock's ticked, we're starting demolition ofthe building tomorrow, I don't think that serves the community, actually. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Well, I don't think it serves the community to have a blight in the middle of downtown either -- MR. PONTE: Oh, I agree. I agree with you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- and it's been there since 2003. MR. PONTE: I agree. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I empathize with Mr. Francois in the fact that his professional has not handled this in a timely manner, but I'm going to chastise Mr. Francois in that he didn't get on the phone or something and say why aren't you getting this done for me? Because I know that's what I would do. You were a little bit too complacent or too busy, one of the two. You need to get on and to get it finished, because I think there's an alternative here. We can continue to let the fines go as their going, give them X amount of time to complete it. If they haven't got it done in that time frame, then grant the county the right to have the choice to tear it down. MR. PONTE: Yes, I'd agree to that. I think that's what I'm saymg. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Because we've got to do something and make it stick. MR. PONTE: Yeah. MR. MORGAN: From the photographs that I've seen and from testimony, I agree with the county, remove it. It needs to be torn down. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: But the gentleman has spent $20,000. They said -- MR. MORGAN: There's a lot of people spend a lot of money. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: They just said that they had an engineer within the last 60 days? Page 143 TO/A r:""'i';" ,c-l. iJ ...' November 29,2007 MR. BRUGGER: He told us the application -- MR. MORGAN: Has he been inside and taken photographs, taken measurements? MR. BRUGGER: He didn't take photographs. He did a personal visit. He did not take photographs. MR. MORGAN: He just walked through the building. MR. BRUGGER: He's been a structural engineer for 50 years, yes. MR. MORGAN: Did he make an analysis of the inside structure? MR. BRUGGER: He told me that, in his opinion, by placing a new -- the walls were structurally sound, the building needed a new roof and everything would be okay. MR. MORGAN: I still agree with the county. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'll entertain motions or suggestions as to how we want to do this imposition of fines and the other two orders that are -- requests that are out there. MR. LEFEBVRE: We might be able to have come to an agreement here by having it stated that within a certain time frame, if, again, they do not get the building permitted and CO'd and so forth, that it can be torn down. So that ultimately that would be the end result, Jerry, and I think that would take care of all the issues. I guess the question would be what would be your time frame for having the building CO'd. MR. BRUGGER: Could I suggest that we would be given 60 days to get the SDP finalized because of the holidays. As I said, he's promised me it would be before Christmas, but I can't rely on that. So we would have 60 days to get the SDP submitted to the county -- well, the approval period is going to take six months probably from the county for an approval. I can't guarantee -- again, we've hired a professional engineering who has experience with the county working with Collier County, and hopefully the matters are all there. But I'm doing three other SDPs Page 144 'f,"6..'."~ ~ I. IJ ,:::i!,~ {,. . November , 2007 right now, they come back for comments after about 45 days, it takes 30 days to respond. Sometimes you get a second set of comments. So I'm saying it's probably going to take another six !l;lonths after that to get the SDP approved with the county. MR. LEFEBVRE: I don't think in this case we can do a blanket one year and get everything done, because the SDP has to be reviewed by the county, and you can't penalize the respondent for the time it takes the county. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is there a guarantee that an SDP will be granted, Michelle? MS. ARNOLD: I think that there's no guarantees, but they're-- that was the recommendation from the county that they pursue that, so CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It's plausible then that they -- MS. ARNOLD: -- it's something that they believe is -- yeah, it's plausible, feasible. MR. BRUGGER: There's been actually a meeting held with the county where you have the, you know, pre-SDP meeting, the planning session meeting, and that was what was suggested. And in my review of it, I didn't see anything adverse. We've had to make some modification to include surface water management that wasn't there. But in speaking with the engineer, the property can be brought into compliance and there should be no problem. MR. LEFEBVRE: Can we maybe structure it where it's 60 days for SDP to be submitted, and then upon any comments regarding SDP, let's say -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Upon approval of the SDP. MR. LEFEBVRE: Well, I don't want to say approval, because if there's comments to be made on the SDP and it takes -- I want to have a time from for any comments, that they have to come back within a certain amount of time with those comments. Because they could just hang up and just sit there. Page 145 I 6 -I,' ,1- Novelnbef~9, 2007 So ifthere's any comments from the county regarding SDP, they must be resubmitted within -- MR. BRUGGER: I'd agree to 30 days for resubmittal. MR. LEFEBVRE: Within 30 days. And upon approval of the SDP, X amount of time to pull permits. And then from there-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: She said the permits are all ready to go except for the SDP. MR. LEFEBVRE: Okay. All right, then-- MR. BRUGGER: Well, the one thing I would suggest is that we know during that period whether the county will keep this permit active or whether or not it has to be brought up to -- whether there's been code changes. Because if we feel comfortable we're getting an SDP, there should be no reason that the permit shouldn't be verified, you know, that we don't go back and argue over building permits issues then. MR. LEFEBVRE: When was the permit issued? MR. BRUGGER: Well, the last comment letter was April 16th of 2006. So it's been a year -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: There's no permit. MR. LEFEBVRE: There's no permit issued. MR. KELLY: I have a question. What happens if they miss one of these deadlines? They're already being fined. Do you fine them more? Or what is the purpose of all the individual deadlines? MS. ARNOLD: It sounds like you're recommending to modify your order to grant additional time. So we would not be imposing fines today, it would be granting additional time. MS. RAWSON: I was going to ask you that. Based on your discussion, I mean, we're here on a request for imposition of fines -- MR. BRUGGER: I would suggest that if we don't make those deadlines, that the county can come back and bring us here to bring forward their motion to tear the building down. MR. KELL Y: I would just make a motion that we impose the Page 146 !l1 "% . i, f Novemb& 29, 2007 fines and that we allow the county to, at its decision, decide what to do with this building, let's say six months from now or nine months from now. And then the county, based upon the progress, can decide at that point whether, hey, another couple of months this thing is going to be fine and they're going to rebuild it or there's no progress, we need to remove this structure. MR. PONTE: Does that mean that we would have to modify our order where it says -- where the demolition is part of the original order? So if -- MR. BRUGGER: I don't think demolition, that isn't part of the existing order, is it? No, you're seeking it now. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It was crossed out. Jean, can we do that? MS. RAWSON: I was just asking like where you're going. Because we are here on a request for an imposition of fines. You don't have to do that, you can turn this into the modification of the order. I just need to know what-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Which way we're going? MS. RAWSON: Right. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We were told we had like -- they were requesting us to reduce the fine, and we've kind of pretty much threw that one out. We were going to, I think, impose the fines and then modify the order in lieu with -- in other words, they're wanting to tear down the building, but we know that he's invested 20,000. So we're trying to give him a little bit of leeway in saying that we're going to let this continue, we're going to impose the fines as they are now, let it continue, but then modify our order to state that if in six to nine months, whatever we decide, that if they have not made enough progress, then we would allow the county to then demolish the building on their discretion with how much progress is being made. Page 147 ." _:" A 3 November 29,2007 So we're kind of combining two things. Are we allowed to do that? That was my question. MS. RAWSON: Well, I think it's probably going to require two orders. MS. ARNOLD: Well, and I think that there might be some, I guess, unfairness to the property owner, because then we're going to allow fines to accrue for another six months and then additional costs for the demolition would be compounded on top of that. So -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We want to encourage him to hold his feet to the fire. MS. ARNOLD: I understand. MR. KELL Y: Would the county be willing to just pull this imposition of fines and bring it back in six, nine months, after you determine whether or not progress has been made? MS. ARNOLD: I would rather the board, if that's -- if you're wanting to grant them that time, I would rather you modify your order to grant them that time so that we're not placing a lien on their property for this amount -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: In other words, you don't want us to impose the fines and extend the time, you want us to do one or the other. MR. LEFEBVRE: Let me ask another pretty important question. Are you looking to finance any of this work? DR. FRANCOIS: It will be a small portion. I mean, to clarify something, I already spent over $40,000 in the process. Before the first permit that I was trying to get through the county I spent over $20,000. The $20,000 dollars that my lawyer is talking about, that's what I already give to Mr. Foley. So over $40,000 is already spent, you know, in the process. MR. LEFEBVRE: Again, a question. Are you going to finance any of these repairs? Because if you do and we impose a fine, it is Page 148 16 I m NovembJ29,2007 going to be on record and that might impinge on your financing. DR. FRANCOIS: Yes, I will finance, you know, part of it. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have an idea. That we not impose the fine at this time, that we modify our order. And this is -- I'm just throwing out as an idea, guys. In six months if not significant progress has been made, to then allow the county to demolish the building. MR. LEFEBVRE: I would agree with that. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's not a motion that I can make. MR. LEFEBVRE: I'd like -- I'd like to make a motion to amend our order where it states ifthere's not sufficient improvement or progress made to getting permits and so forth, that the county will be allowed to demolish the building. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Within-- MR. LEFEBVRE: Within six months, thank you. MR. BRUGGER: At their discretion? MR. LEFEBVRE: At their discretion. MR. BRUGGER: I'd like to remove the word improvement, but progress -- MR. LEFEBVRE: Yes, progress. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I have a second? MR. PONTE: I will second that motion. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? MR. MORGAN: I disagree. Page 149 tift A 161 3 November 29, 2007 MS. RAWSON: I need some clarification. Ifwe are modifying the order that you entered back in October, which gave them one year till October 26th, 2007, and now you are giving them an additional six months, that's additional six months from today's date? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: From today's date. MS. RAWSON: And you're adding one more part of your order in the alternative the county may demolish -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Demolish the building. MR. KELLY: So they're technically not in violation now. MS. RAWSON: Correct. They wouldn't be-- MS. ARNOLD: They're in violation but the fines aren't accruing. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: They're in violation but the fines are not accruing, so there are no fines at this time. MR. BRUGGER: Thank you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And with that, can we adjourn for lunch? MS. ARNOLD: For how long? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: One hour, thirty minutes? Is there still a little Subway shop? It's after lunchtime, so everybody else is gone. So why don't we adjourn for 30 minutes and we'll be back here at 2:40. (A lunch break was taken.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We'll get started. Go ahead and call this meeting back to order. And I guess we'll be hearing the Blocker case next. MR. WHITE: I appreciate the reminder. And I would like to thank the board for allowing us to table the discussion about our motion and to take the time to fully consider not only that but if we get as far as the fines aspect of it. And before I would forget, I would also like to thank you for last month's continuance to allow us to come back today. I appreciate that. Page 150 16' I A ~ November 29;'2007 I think where we had left off, if my recollection serves, is that there was a discussion about the zoning determination and whether in fact one had been made officially or otherwise by staff. And as a point of concern from the original hearing back in April of last, my recollection is in review of the record was there wasn't a professional planning opinion. And all of that said, today we're at a place where I'm asking for your consideration of a provision in the Land Development Code where I'm only aware of most recently there being some concern based upon what were the then known facts in law by the county's professional staff. It's not part ofthese proceedings, it's not part ofthe record, but it wasn't until, I believe, September of this year that I was apprised of what, if any, concerns the county may have had about the SIP process. The reason why we weren't more emphatic about it, I believe, before when we spoke to you at our rehearing is because we were not then presently able to effectively apply for and utilize the SIP process. One of the reasons we asked for our continuance had to do with what I had mentioned earlier, was the receipt of quitclaim deeds just this past Tuesday on the board's agenda, Board of County Commissioners' agenda. Those quitclaim deeds will become effective after tomorrow when we sign the Florida Department of Protection's consent order. Because it's condition ofthe approval of the quitclaim deeds that we sign the consent order. That makes sense from the county's perspective because one of the issues that had been holding up the whole discussion about the clean-up was who owned the right-of-way, and more so, who had the responsibility to clean up those tires and junk cars. MS. ARNOLD: Can I object? Because that has nothing to do with the Blocker case. Tires on a right-of-way has nothing to do with the case of the illegal land use that was brought before you all. Ijust wanted to state that. Page 151 f"^"':, ' tl, J .., fl ""r' N~veinber~9, 21107 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Michelle, I understand your contention, but I think part of the board's opinion at the time and I think what he's trying to refer to is we were concerned about the safety because of the tires and the junk cars that were so close to the residents' homes at that time. And we pointed that out. So I think that's what he's reflecting. MR. WHITE: That's absolutely correct, Madam Chair. And further to that, I note, and the deed's not here -- and I have photographs that were taken about six weeks ago of that clean-up as well as one other piece of information I'd like to put into evidence, if I may. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, that would be packet -- MR. WHITE: I guess this would be our B. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Does county have an objection? MS. ARNOLD: I have not seen anything. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Would you like to look at them first? MS. ARNOLD: That would be nice. MR. LEFEBVRE: What relevancy do these pictures have to -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm sorry. He asked what was the relevancy of the pictures. And I said I think it's because he's trying to show that they've cleaned up some of the area that's close to the mobile homes. And that was one of their safety issues that we had in concern at the original hearing. MR. WHITE: I'm presenting them presently for the purpose of demonstrating how we now are able to meaningfully participate in the site improvement plan process. And without -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We need to have a motion made whether or not to accept the packet. MR. DEAN: Motion to accept the packet. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear a second? MR. PONTE: I'll second. Page 152 ..... 161 A 3 November 29, 2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. PONTE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) MR. WHITE: Thank you. And part of that packet -- yes, thank you. There are three separate photographs. Feel -- MR. LEFEBVRE: They're all copies, correct? MR. WHITE: Yes. MS. ARNOLD: I have to object to the second part of it. Again, because -- well, the objection is the health department's rules have nothing to do with the county zoning rules. And that's the other thing that's being-- MR. KELL Y: Is that a separate packet? MR. WHITE: That was part of what I was looking to bring in. And if Michelle wants to make a separate objection to that, that's fine. I'm happy to -- MS. ARNOLD: And I guess I need clarification from the attorneys on what we're really doing, because I thought this was a motion to modify the board's order. And it looks like we're getting additional evidence that wasn't considered previously at the original hearings. It's almost like a continuation of a hearing that -- I'm not really clear what we're doing. MR. WHITE: I can answer that. I'm sorry, Jeff-- MR. WRIGHT: I would like to get into that --let me pipe in a syllable or two here. The -- earlier we had a discussion today on when Page 153 16 Ot' '~~: November 29, 20cr1 would it be appropriate to amend an order. And I agree with Michelle and Ms. Rawson's comments that it would be appropriate where there's a clear error or maybe where there's a health and safety issue, or it's just manifestly unjust the way it is. And I don't think that there would be any question that it would be appropriate to amend an order here. Mr. White, I think, is pointing out a lot ofthings that don't fall into any of those categories. And I just wanted to point out that, since the hearing, and I don't know if this is my rebuttal or not, but I want to get this on the record, since the April, '06 hearing, there was a motion for rehearing, as you know. There was a mediation. That didn't go so well, apparently, because Mr. White has appealed the results ofthat mediation-- MR. WHITE: I have appealed the way that the county handled the consideration of it. MR. WRIGHT: And then he's also petitioned the Board of County Commissioners for relief last Tuesday and pulled it off the agenda at the last minute and got a continuance at the last meeting. And Michelle Arnold noted on the record at the last meeting that it had been pulled twice from the agenda. So I just want to keep the focus of the board on the issue at hand. And that is, is it appropriate to modify this order. And I haven't heard any error pointed out. I haven't heard any health, safety issues. In fact, Mr. White just pointed out that, based on these photos, the health, safety issues have been addressed. So there's no burning building to take care of. And I don't see any grounds on which a modification would be appropriate. What I see, if I count them up, how many bites of the apple that Mr. White is asking for, I'm going to have to start using both of my hands, because it's been at least five bites. And I'd also point out, I want to get this on the record too, this order that he's asking you to modify is presently on appeal in the Page 154 1, )1 ~ November 19,2007 circuit court. MR. WHITE: That's not correct. MR. WRIGHT: I have the appeal here. And if! may read an excerpt from it. Nature of relief sought. In the alternative, petitioner seeks to have its notice of appeal of the CEB's order considered immediately then filed. Basically -- MR. WHITE: At which point it would then be considered. So it is more legally correct to say it's not. MR. WRIGHT: I'd defer to your own attorney on this particular point. But the caption of the appeal is: Petition for Writ of Certiorari based on the BCC's handling, or, in the alternative, notice of appeal of the very orders he's asking you to modify. So he's already submitted an appeal. And I'd defer to Ms. Rawson that when you plead in the alternative it's an either/or. They can be mutually exclusive. But you are pleading, you're laying it out there. So he -- I'm really not sure what the result of this hearing -- if for example you were to approve his modification, whether or not that would mean that he would be sticking with the appeal of the prior orders or would he change this to the modified order that you would issue? I'm to really sure. And maybe, Mr. White, you want to put on record right now that your notice of appeal is withdrawn. Because otherwise, it's in the court, it's under consideration by the court, and you represented earlier that it's not. But I just wanted to point out that it is. So that's some comments I wanted to get on the record, so you weren't -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That refers back to my original request at the beginning, and I was told by our counsel that we should listen to what the Blockers' attorney had to say, which is what I think we were doing, was indulging him. As to whether or not we would even consider making a Page 155 i6 / u( ~ ~_# November 29,2007 modification, we were just trying to listen to what he had to say. I did caution before the break, though, that I didn't want to be rehearing this case. And I don't want to rehear the case, because it's not a rehearing, it's asking for a modification. So I'm kind of like going to look for Jean, and also Mr. Kelly has a comment that he would like to submit. MS. RAWSON: If your original order of the Code Enforcement Board is up on appeal, you have no jurisdiction to modify it -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We can't do anything, okay. MS. RAWSON: -- and I don't know whether it's up on appeal or not. So I would look to the county attorney for that. He's apparently got a copy of it with him. But if it looks like they've appealed your order, you have no jurisdiction to hear the case. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We can't do anything. MR. WHITE: May I clarify? This is going to take a while. I told you this is a complex case and it has a long procedural history. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: One simple question for you. MR. WHITE: Yes. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Per the county's attorney, this case has been appealed -- MR. WHITE: That is not correct. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- is that true? MR. WHITE: That is not correct. Unless and until the court determines that the relief we've requested originally, which has to do with the special magistrate's consideration by the Board of County Commissioners, is not going to be granted, it cannot be considered filed until that point. And if! were to, under Chapter 70, which is the special magistrate proceeding for this type of alternative relief, if I filed that notice of appeal, I effectively have lost the jurisdiction of the Page 156 T?> A 3 November 29,2007 magistrate proceeding. They are alternatives to each other. And what the statute says is if you come in and you file a notice of appeal, which I have not done, I have done it in the alternative and alerted the court, because the time frame between when the court may choose to deny the relief I'm seeking as part of the magistrate proceeding, if that's denied, then instantaneously the clock starts to run for the time for me to file my notice of appeal. And I only have 30 days from the original order that you entered. And my concern is that by the time I actually get the Court's order, my time to have appealed would have expired. Because I think that there's a good argument that the county may have -- and I hate having to tell them the tactics that are their best defense in my filed case -- but if! don't plead it in the alternative, I don't have the opportunity for making sure that the window doesn't close on my 30 days, that everybody says I have, before I file my notice of appeal. It is not technically filed unless and until the court denies the otherwise requested relief. Because that continues the magistrate proceeding, which I expect will remand it, send it back to the Board of County Commissioners to dispose of. Because that statutory process says that it doesn't end until the Board of County Commissioners have disposed of that special magistrate's order -- or report, excuse me. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: You have met with the magistrate once, though, correct? MR. WHITE: Yeah, we did. That was -- took forever to get going, and when we finally did -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And that case you're appealing, correct? MR. WHITE: I'm appealing not that but rather the way that the Board of County Commissioners considered it. We didn't have a chance to appear at that consideration. We didn't have any notice, so -- we never got to put our side of the story before the Board of County Page 157 ;'r; i! A '"7 ." I. ~ Novembef29, 2007 .. Commissioners. And I __ to tell you what would the result be, my belief is that I may be able to convince my client that if we enter into the SIP process, that we withdraw all of those things. And in fact, the reason why I tell you that this is a complex matter is because up until near the end of July I was working with the county attorney's office, Administrator Schmitt, on a compliance agreement, the significance of which is, if you go back to the provision I showed you out of the LDC, the alternative way by which we can have the SIP process entered into is one that's reached by compliance agreement. And we spent months working on that in coordination with the efforts regarding the DEP and the consent order. So some of the characterizations we really haven't been doing anything to try to abate these violations, I just can't agree with. We've been very busy. Now, what's the reference the photos-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- the legal round, and some clean-up. So I won't say you haven't been doing anything. But Jean, I need some general direction, because I've got two -- MS. RAWSON: I can tell you -- again, I haven't seen the appeal and so I'm just going to give you some general overall rules oflaw. If you file an appeal of this board's order, you lose jurisdiction. If you file an appeal in the alternative, and based on the conversation I gather that he's appealed both the special master-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Magistrate. MS. RAWSON: -- magistrate's order as well as yours. If you plead in the alternative, it's as if -- in other words, that's like you have still lost jurisdiction if you're one of the alternatives. MR. WHITE: But we won't know what that is, Madam Chair and board members, until that judge rules. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: But technically then, if you don't Page 158 t6JnbS 29,3007 know what that is -- MS. RAWSON: When you file -- when you file, you lose j urisdi cti on. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- we can't know what that is. So therefore, we can't make a ruling. MR. WHITE: I wouldn't agree with you. I think it's just the opposite. You still have jurisdiction until the court says you don't. MS. RAWSON: I think you'd lose jurisdiction the minute an appeal is filed. The minute that appeal goes into the clerk's office, it gets stamped -- MR. WHITE: I have not filed, to my recollection, such a notice. I'm asking the court to consider it. MR. WRIGHT: If! may, this does not have a case caption or a stamped date, but it's captioned Notice of Appeal. I don't know what case number it is. It's signed by Mr. White, May 24th, saying that he appeals to the Circuit Court of the 20th Judicial Circuit regarding the Code Enforcement Board's finding of fact, conclusions of law and order of the board -- I'm sorry. I can give you a copy of this document, so -- I was trying to speak -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We couldn't even catch up with you. MR. WRIGHT: Bottom line is I have in my hands a notice of appeal ofthe very cases that he's requesting modification of, signed by Mr. White, dated May 24th, '07. Maybe he never filed it but this is what was presented to our office -- MR. WHITE: No, I -- I will put on the record that that is part of the filing of my petition for Writ of Certiorari, and they're different. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Jean, explain to me what Writ of Certiorari means. MS. RAWSON: Petition for Writ of Certiorari is part of your appeal when you are asking the higher court to reach down and hear a lower Court's decision. This is not the United States Supreme Court. Page 159 r 1." .,,,, ! '1: . . Novembef 29,2007 That's when you usually hear the Certiorari term used. But you file a petition of Certiorari because you're asking the Circuit Court to hear a Code Enforcement Board or a magistrate's ruling. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So it still takes it out of our hands, then, doesn't it? MR. WHITE: No, ma'am. MS. RAWSON: If it's been filed with the court. In my opinion it does. If it's been filed at the clerk's office -- and we don't have a filed stamped copy -- but if it's a petition for Certiorari and that notice of appeal is attached to it, I don't think you have jurisdiction to do anything yet. MR. WHITE: I couldn't object more. And unfortunately, the reason why this is so critical, not only for your consideration today but to the rest of our case, because if what you do is effectively consider me to have appealed the case and argue that you've lost jurisdiction, you've trumped what the court is being asked to do. Now, you are loath to step into the shoes of the zoning official for interpretations of law -- and I just can't tell you how devastating the effect would be to make that ruling. Because the way that the Chapter 70 statute works is very precise, it tells you -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do we have a copy ofthat? MR. WHITE: Chapter 70? MR. WRIGHT: Yes, ma'am. In fact, I'd like to make this part of the record, if! could. It's captioned Notice of Appeal submitted by Patrick White to the Circuit Court. MR. WHITE: I believe that that, without the rest of the filing, I'm going to have to object to. It is in and of itself going to be prejudicial without the rest of the document. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Hang on. MR. WHITE: The only thing you'll have is something that is what is Part B of my request, that only becomes legally effective if Page 160 ,I I ~ A ~;v~mber ~~2007 part A is denied. If my Writ for Certiorari is denied by the Court under the Chapter 70 proceeding and they say there was no error, the Board of County Commissioners did everything appropriate with regards to that special magistrate's report, up until that point that notice of appeal is not considered filed. Because the second it gets filed I've lost the jurisdiction for the special magistrate proceeding. So what you would be doing is effectively telling the Court, and I know you can't do this, that they can't hear what I've asked them to hear. And that's why it's of such concern and why I think that -- my understanding of how that statute is intended to operate. And there's been a district court of appeal in the Second District that's come out since that says as long as that magistrate proceeding is going forward under Chapter 70, that the time is tolled for filing your appeal. My 30 days, I suspect, could be up by the time I know what the outcome of the Court's decision is. So in an abundance of caution, to not have the county come back to me and tell me, sorry, Mr. White, the window's closed, I filed that as an alternative. I did not separately file it. It has not activated the Court's time frame to consider your prior order. MS. ARNOLD: Jean, is what you're saying or Jeff what you're saying by filing in the alternative it gives -- it files both motions -- MS. RAWSON: Correct. MS. ARNOLD: -- and therefore once a decision's made on the first one, it doesn't -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: It mayor may not -- MS. ARNOLD: It doesn't extinguish that 30-day period that he's concerned about that would toll his appeal. MS. RAWSON: No, it doesn't. MS. ARNOLD: So they can consider it right after. But essentially he's filed both motions, is that what you're saying? Page 161 .- A 1~' , ~ November 2"9,2007 MS. RAWSON: I think that's what he said. All I have in my hand is a notice of appeal dated the 29th day of May, 2007. MR. WHITE: And the problem with that is it seems to suggest to you that what I've done is cut off my own nose to spite my face, which of course I have not done. I have not filed a notice of appeal. I am not telling the court that I'm appealing. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Let me see if! understand what Jean's trying to tell us. By you filing as you have in -- MS. RAWSON: The alternative. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Alternative means that if A doesn't go through, your B is then considered. MR. WHITE: Then B. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: But because you have done that, you've tied our hands, in my opinion, in what I'm understanding Jean to explain. Because if A doesn't go through and then B is considered, B is our case, and so there -- let me finish. So therefore unless A is accepted, we are at risk of making a decision on something that may come up in front of the courts and we have modified something that they are then going to be considering, and that's going to be null and void anyway. Am I correct, Jean? MS. RAWSON: I hate to answer your questions in a vacuum, because I don't really have any of the filings in front of me. But if you plead in the alternative, they can discount A, go to B, they can, you know, keep B and throw out A. The alternative means either one, either/or. MR. WHITE: No, ma'am. This one is specifically tied to a series of events that are A and B. You correctly said it, Madam Chairman. You said if A is denied, only then do they move to B. They are not a petition for two kinds of relief. If that were true, I would have filed a separate notice of appeal. I have not done that. And that is why I strenuously object to any characterization that I did. You're effectively telling me I would have committed legal Page 162 "I ',' A 3 J" ~;i! '..... November 29,2007 malpractice. MS. RAWSON: Let me say this. I'm really very uncomfortable with your moving forward and modifying an order when something has been filed with the Circuit Court like a Writ of Certiorari and we've not seen it. Unless I see it and can really properly advise you -- and apparently Mr. Wright doesn't have it either -- it's hard for me to say, oh, well, don't worry about it and let's just go forward. I have to see it in order to really give you a very good legal opinion. MR. WHITE: Let me give you a practical outcome. If! had come to you after the court had ruled, okay, I think that what you're saying would be absolutely correct. If the court ruled and denied my petition and started my notice of appeal, you are all absolutely correct, meaning Jeff and those who see it from that end of the telescope, that I would have lost jurisdiction. This is a jurisdictional question and that is why it is so significant and so important. I don't want you to have lost jurisdiction. If that were the case, my goodness, what have we been doing trying to convince you of an alternative way to cure these violations? And in an abundance of caution, all I would ask you to do is, even if you're wrong, what's the harm? What's the harm? Is the harm going to be that I'm going to take you to court and tell you that I don't want the relief you may give me? Or in the alternative is it going to be that I'm somehow not going to withdraw my appeal? I'm telling you on the record under oath that if we have the SIP relief, we will withdraw it. That was what was in the compliance agreement back in July. MS. RAWSON: Let me answer what the harm is. If you don't have jurisdiction, any order you enter is void. MR. WHITE: And there is no harm. MS. RAWSON : You've wasted your time. MR. WHITE: And the other way for me to cure it is if! withdraw it before the court rules on it, Madam Chair? That's null and void. Page 163 Ib j A NovemJr 29,2007 So I effectively give you the protection, if you will, that you think you may need, but I'm pretty certain you don't. MR. WRIGHT: I just want to get a clarification on the record. I'm a little confused as to how an attorney could sign a notice of appeal, say it's submitted by me, with a bar number on it -- MR. WHITE: As an attachment. MR. WRIGHT: As an attachment or however, it went to the clerk of court. It's now in their hand. And it's captioned Notice of Appeal submitted by you, and that's not in dispute. To the court, that's not in dispute. I'm not sure how there's any other way to interpret it. You could have zipped it in a ziplock bag, thrown it in as an exhibit. But you submitted a notice of appeal to the court, period. And it's there. And I'm not sure if you're denying that. But I think that what you said on the record is that you did indeed submit that very document, submitted by you, signed by you, to the Circuit Court. And if that's not the case, I just want to make sure I've got that right or wrong. MR. WHITE: Very good arguments, Mr. Wright. But let me ask you this: Did you check the docket in Circuit Court? MR. WRIGHT: I did. MR. WHITE: Does the docket show that I have a running notice of appeal? MR. WRIGHT: I'm not really sure. I don't have the docket memorized. MR. WHITE: Did you look through the petition for Writ of Certiorari in the pleading and is it or is it not written in a way that it is clear how the statutory proceeding under 70 intended to operate, that you only have jurisdiction under the magistrate up to the point where you file the notice? If my notice were filed, I would have cut off my own nose to spite my face in the petition for Writ of Certiorari. You can't have it both ways. Page 164 161 A ~ November19,2007 MR. WRIGHT: That document that's captioned Notice of Appeal was or was not filed with the clerk of the court? MR. WHITE: It was filed secondarily to, and would not become legally effective and operate unless the court denied the petition for Writ ofCert. That is my answer, sir. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm going to stop here and I'm going to poll the board just to ask what direction the board wants to go. MR. LEFEBVRE: Ifwe just have-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Temporarily I'm closing the public hearing just to poll the board as to how they want to proceed. Because I don't want to make this decision myself as to how we want to go. MR. PONTE: Personally, I think we're way out of our depth. This is the Code Enforcement Board, and what we're hearing are legal arguments between three lawyers about which way to go. I don't think there's anybody on this board that's qualified to make that decision-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you, George. MR. PONTE: -- just hearing a legal argument over which we have no authority or experience. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Madam Chair, if! may give my little input here also. I feel the same way. I feel that at the minimum we should continue this until the next hearing, allowing for the attorneys to do a little bit more research into the court's docket, perhaps, to get the documents that you need to look at to be sure that the opinions you're giving are the opinions that you espoused today. I suggest that we continue this for at least one month. MR. LEFEBVRE: It would be two months. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Two months. January -- the next hearing, exactly. MR. LEFEBVRE: I guess I want to back up a little bit with the time frame. It came in front of us, we heard the case. Didn't go in Page 165 ISlA ~ Noverrtber 29,2007 favor of the Blockers, so he went to special magistrate. The special magistrate upheld -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Actually, he asked for a rehearing and we denied him. Then he went to the special magistrate. MR. LEFEBVRE: Thank you. The special magistrate upheld our decision. MR. WHITE: Sorry. I know it's not public hearing but I just want to correct the characterization. I don't think that that's fair. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I remember from discussions prior, the special magistrate didn't rule on our issue per se according to the attorney. But he ruled in favor of upholding the basis of it, based on how it was presented, and they didn't have their right, which is why he's appealing it. MR. WHITE: Could I clarify? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: No, I don't want any -- I'm just trying to make it for our discussion. Thank you. MR. LEFEBVRE: There was an appeal filed for a procedural error, whatever case it may be. I feel ifthere was an appeal filed, it was based on the magistrate made a decision either to support -- whatever, made the decision based on the case. If you revert back to Steve Lovelace's case, which is a case where he filed in Circuit Court a day before he was supposed to come back to us, he asked for a rehearing, and it fell -- our meeting was 31 days after our previous hearing. So the attorney went and filed in Circuit Court. At that point, when Mr. Lovelace and the attorney came in, which was about a year and a half ago, came in and said I filed in court, we couldn't hear the case. So I feel that this would fit under that criteria, that if there was an appeal it was based on our case, that it's out of our jurisdiction at that point. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Your input? Page 166 "']f' IJ ~ ,,:< r N~venrl"fer 29 2007 , MR. DEAN: Well, you know, I can piggyback what Gerald said. It makes a lot of sense to me. I kind of agree with that. And if I had to make a decision right now, I'd make a motion for a modification order to be denied. Just because it's on my agenda doesn't mean I have to take it. I mean, I can put it someplace else, and they can go someplace else. MR. KELL Y: In reference to the opinion as to whether or not this case -- I think we are able to modify this case, I think because we modified the order just prior to lunch for Francois, I think we probably should, only because -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm concerned about the appeals out there. MR. KELLY: -- we've done that part. So that's part one. Part two, I think both sides are strong. However, I think that it does make procedural sense to have an order have two parts, and the second part be reliant upon the decision of the first. And I don't think that second part should be considered as filed until the first is ruled upon. But I'm not an attorney. MR. L'ESPERANCE: But that's a legal opinion we're not qualified to make. MR. PONTE: We have contradictory advice-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I am comfortable with the thought of tabling this -- MR. PONTE: We have contradictory advice. Madam Chair, we have contradictory advice on this. One lawyer has said it is not filed because it hasn't been accepted by the court or something to that order. And our attorney is saying it's filed as soon as the clerk receives it. How are we supposed to make some determination about that? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I am going to lean towards your decision that we table this until January, have it come back with the attorneys being able to get all the information together for us, providing Jean with the documents that she needs to review in order to Page 167 1'6~1 A ~ November 29,2007 give us a better understanding so that we can then make an educated ruling one way or the other. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Madam Chair, we are quasi-judicial, not judicial. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Correct. And we need to listen to the advice of our attorney. And I don't want to step above and over her in that guard. MR. LEFEBVRE: Could we make a ruling -- MS. RAWSON: Did -- I just want to ask a question of Jeff. Did you get a certificate of service on the Writ of Cert? Because I know I didn't get it. MR. WRIGHT: It says certificate of service to David Weigel. That's how it got to me. MS. RAWSON: Okay. I haven't seen it. I'm just uncomfortable because we're talking about documents that I haven't seen. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I am-- MR. WHITE: And I think the reason you haven't seen it, if! may, Madam Chair, is because the court itself does not consider it to be a notice of appeal. And if it were, which I'm telling you again, it can't reach until after the matter's considered by the judge, then the notice of appeal, then the service would come. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's why I'm leaning towards thinking the only fair thing to do here is table this until January so that we can get everybody to have the proper documents that they need to look at to advise us. MR. WRIGHT: Madam Chair, if! may, this is -- we're all conceding here that this is before the court, it may be a contingency that is before the court, but ultimately the issues he's asking you to decide are going to be decided by a court. And I think that when we come back in January we're going to be stuck with these same legal questions, and they're more appropriate -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Hopefully she'll have seen the Page 168 'i'I ,if f; n '7 { ,,' No}kmber 29, 2007 - documents and can give us some advice as to whether or nOt we could proceed at all. And that's what I'm looking for. MR. WRIGHT: I'm afraid that we might be getting an eighth bite of the apple here. MS. ARNOLD: And I would speak for the county. I think that's exactly what we're doing. All of these efforts are delaying any action whatsoever. And there was one part of your order that was complied with, a meeting that was attended, and he was given direction at that time how to comply. No efforts whatsoever have been made to try to come into compliance with that direction that was given. MR. WHITE: That is absolutely false. We were not given any direction -- MS. ARNOLD: Can I speak, Patrick? Because you've allowed ample time to speak and you've interrupted everybody -- MR. WHITE: I don't have any direction -- MS. ARNOLD: Can I speak -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Excuse me. MR. WHITE: I don't have any direction. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Excuse me. I'm going to make everybody stop speaking here in a minute. MS. ARNOLD: Can I finish, Madam Chair? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Sure. MS. ARNOLD: There's been arguments about your ability to amend your order. I don't argue against that. I think you can. The reasons for amending that order have been given to you. And I think what he's -- what is being asked of you today is beyond those reasons that have been granted in prior orders that have been amended. There's been a request to enter into a site improvement plan process. That is not something that is afforded to this particular property because it's zoned inappropriately for that use. There's been discussion about the compliance agreement process being another avenue for him to take to get into the site improvement Page 169 I 6' Jlve~er 29, 2007 plan process, and the county was entering into that. It stopped. Well, why? Because it's not an adequate avenue for him to pursue. These are all these -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I don't disagree with you. I agree with what you're saying. But I am sitting on what I think is more important is a legal issue as to whether or not we can even move forward because of a potential appeal that is out there. And until Jean has a chance to review that or until we can find out whether or not that his appeal is stated as Mr. White states or if it states as -- MS. ARNOLD: In the interim, they continue to collect rent on something since your order has been rendered. And that's my point. This is just a way to continue to operate in violation of your order. MR. WHITE: I object. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I feel like my hands are a little bit tied, Jean. And I'm looking for you, because I really think we need to __ to do service correctly, we need to look at the legal issue. MS. RAWSON: Well, here, it's interesting. What Ms. Arnold is telling you is to deny the motion because it doesn't qualify to be modified. My discomfort in your hearing the motion at all is the lack of jurisdiction. But Mr. White on the other hand is telling you you've got jurisdiction, go ahead and make a ruling. So -- MR. WHITE: Let me make the rest of my presentation -- MS. RAWSON: -- you know, it's going to be up to you. He says, oh, yeah, you've got jurisdiction, I want you to have jurisdiction -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So we can make a ruling -- MS. RAWSON: Well, according to Mr. White-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- according to Mr. White-- MS. RAWSON: -- it's okay, you didn't lose any jurisdiction. I don't know that. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Ifwe don't modify anything, then Page 170 ( N~vem~r 29, 2007 we don't break the jurisdiction if it has gone to court, correct? MS. RAWSON: Right. I don't know. I know that when you file an appeal or a Writ of Cert, and I've seen the documents that you guys don't have anymore jurisdiction. He says you've got jurisdiction. Michelle is saying okay, if you have jurisdiction, deny the motion. MR. LEFEBVRE: Jean, do we have in an alternative denial to hear or denial to rule upon either one ofthese? MS. RAWSON: You can deny the motion. You can table the motion. MR. LEFEBVRE: Table is what I'm thinking of. MS. RAWSON : You can table the motion. MR. LEFEBVRE: Which is not denying it. MR. DEAN: Madam Chair, I'd like to make a motion. Motion for modification of orders be denied. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear a second -- MR. LEFEBVRE: Denied or tabled? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: He said denied. Do I hear a second? MR. KELL Y: By doing that, we're accepting jurisdiction. MR. DEAN: I agree. MR. KELLY: Which I'm in favor of. But I'm just saying, I was the only one who was in favor of accepting jurisdiction on that. MS. ARNOLD: How are you accepting jurisdiction by acting on a motion that was asked of you? MR. KELL Y: If I'm not mistaken, by hearing the motion we're accepting jurisdiction, where Mr. Wright is saying that we technically don't have because an appeal was filed. MS. ARNOLD: Like the Lovelace case, you took action on that request, you denied it. MR. WRIGHT: Based on a lack of jurisdiction. Page 171 16 ,A ~vember 29,2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Exactly. MR. KELLY: Oh, I'm sorry. Okay, thank you. I see what you're saymg. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have a motion on the floor. Do I have a second? MR. MORGAN: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? MR. L'ESPERANCE: Opposed. MR. PONTE: Opposed. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I have two opposed? MR. WHITE: May I comment. You've just cut off my ability to present you with the evidence that I think could have led you to conclude otherwise. And I fail to see how that's procedural due process. And that's what I'm actually just trying to get for my client is procedural due process. I don't care how many bites of the apple. If the apple is sour, my client has a right to keep coming back and asking. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I appreciate you staying here the length of time you did and allowing the people to go in front of you. MR. WHITE: Thank you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I feel that in this case we have ruled the only way we could, other than to suspend it. MR. WHITE: Certainly that would have been preferred. And I don't know how you disposed of the motion and I don't recall there being a second, so procedurally I guess it's -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: There was a second. Page 172 16 I A "Z N~mber 29, 2007 MR. WHITE: I'm talking about the motion to table, Madam Chair. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: There wasn't a second. MR. WHITE: I understand. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, the next case is Board of County Commissioners versus -- oh, did he have a question? MR. WHITE: Well, what I wanted to do was to proffer what I would have otherwise told you as part of my motion. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I think we've made a decision and I think that's ended it. I'm sorry. MR. WHITE: Okay, then I hope to not bore you by telling you about it in a different manner. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We have the request of impositions of fines now, the Blockers. MS. ARNOLD: Right. I guess you can -- I guess -- should I proceed with those? MR. KELLY: Michelle, are these all-- they're the same. MS. ARNOLD: It's the same thing. MR. KELLY: Can we lump them together or do you have to do them individually? MS. ARNOLD: I don't think so. I don't need to do them individually, unless Jean, you-- MS. RAWSON: I'm going to -- MS. ARNOLD: -- I'll just say it all together. MS. RAWSON: That's fine. I'm going to write three orders. MS. ARNOLD: These were all heard on the same day. That was heard April 27, 2006 and that was Cases No. 2006-16, 2006-17, and 2006-18, Board of County Commissioners versus Jerry and Kimberlea Blocker. The violations were of unlawful and unappropriate development of residential use in an industrial zoned property. A violation was found on all three cases, and the orders have Page 173 161A 3 November 29,2007 been attached for your review. Weare at this time asking that fines be imposed at a rate of $150 per day between the period of June 30th, 2007 through November 27th, 2007, 152 days, for a total of$22,800. Also -- and that was for item number two, which indicated that if a rezoning action -- if rezoning -- acting in due diligence to pursue the rezoning and obtaining the same within 365 days from the pre-application meeting. So that was not done. Also, item number six indicated in the alternative by obtaining a complete and sufficient Collier County demolition permit within 90 days or within 10 days after abandonment of the pursuit of the SDP rezoning and SDP, whichever is applicable -- and from that there's an additional $150 per day from the period of July 10th, 2007 through November 29th, 142 days, for $21,300. Additionally, there's operational costs of$354.16, for a total of $44,454.16. And that applies to each case. The numbers are -- yeah, the amounts are exactly the same for all three cases. MR. L'ESPERANCE: 44,000 -- MS. ARNOLD: 44,454.16. MS. RAWSON: They all go through November the 29th? MS. ARNOLD: Yes. MS. RAWSON: So order number nine was -- what was the total? MS. ARNOLD: The total for order number nine? MS. RAWSON: Order item nine. MS. ARNOLD: Okay, all right. Which is equivalent to two, which is what I said, it's the $22,800. Because in the order we state what they have to do and then the fine amounts -- MS. RAWSON: Gotcha. MS. ARNOLD: -- are noted in another number. So it's a total of 44,454.16 per case. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Jean, I have a question. Because Page 174 - 16 I A ~ember29,2007 we state in here that if they get a rezoning upon approval of an SDP or SIP. He's apparently trying to get permission to go after an SIP. So he is actually trying to comply in one way of proceeding. MS. RAWSON: Correct. MS. ARNOLD: But your order says rezone and SDP/SIP, whichever appropriate. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Right. My thing is he's trying to get the SIP and get permission to get an SIP, so he's trying to comply in one respect, correct? MS. RAWSON: I think he is. And again, if you issue fines and he complies, he can come back and ask you to abate them. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Right, so he has that -- MR. WHITE: Assuming that those fines and liens aren't recorded. Because once they are, you lose jurisdiction and it goes to the Board of County Commissioners. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Well, then they have the right to waive fines too, I believe. MS. RAWSON: Well, yes, that's true. Actually, he has the right to come back and ask you to abate the fines, however, before you end up turning it over to the county attorney for foreclosure. That's when you lose jurisdiction. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So even if we impose the fines, if they get through and they get the SIP or they get through this process, they can come back and ask us to abate the fines, correct? MS. RAWSON: We do it all the time. I know there's an Attorney General's opinion that says you can't do that, but we do it all the time. And it's not in the statute that you can't. The only time you have ever lost jurisdiction is when you tell the county attorney to foreclose. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, thank you. MR. WHITE: I'm just looking for some clarification, because I had been told by another assistant county attorney, Mr. Klatzkow, that as soon as those orders were recorded that jurisdiction of this board Page 175 ""1" -A.. "~l~ Ndember 29,2007 161 was lost. And if I'm mistaken about that, and what's on the record today is Ms. Rawson's opinion and this board's understanding that up to the point in the time at which foreclosure is being ordered -- or sought by this board that I have the opportunity to come back and request abatement and/or mitigation of fines, then that's fine, and I guess we could talk about that. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Jean, do you want to answer that one? MS. RAWSON: I'm going to ask Jeff for his opinion. MR. WRIGHT: I agree with Jean, and the reason is, that particular AG opinion, we like to say it's hard and fast but it's not really settled law, and that opinion really says that it can only be released, compromised or settled by the governing body, so nobody else can get rid of it, but it doesn't say that it can't be amended in that interim. So it -- actually the special magistrate and -- the CEB special magistrate tends to draw the line at the imposition and not amend orders. But I have seen even her amend her lien orders. And I know, as Jean says, that you guys have done it regularly. Obviously the clear line in the sand is that 90-day period, once it's turned over for foreclosure, but until then the law's not perfectly settled. So I would defer to Jean and whatever advice you're getting from her. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: In the past we have released people. MS. RAWSON: Yes-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: As long as they come up -- we've abated -- MS. RAWSON: Even have a form they can fill out to come in and ask for an abatement or a reduction of fines after they're in compliance, notwithstanding the AG's opinion. MR. WHITE: If I could just kind of try to vision how that would Page 176 1'6 1 ~oJmber 29,2007 have to occur. We would have to be cited for a violation of non-conforming under SIP. MR. KELL Y: If you stick around for a few minutes, the next item on our agenda is a request to forward to the county attorney's office. At that point you could come and speak to those issues. MR. WHITE: Understood. I have it clarified. Up until this moment, my understanding was otherwise, but I'm accepting what's being said and it makes sense to me. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I will say that is how we have always practiced. Which is why I brought it out. I wanted to get that clarified for you. MS. ARNOLD: I believe there was a discussion with Mr. White at -- with this board regarding no time period for requesting reduction abatement of fine specified in your -- so, I mean, if you lose jurisdiction once you imposed it, how do you not then have -- how do you abate or reduce those fines if you lose jurisdiction after you've imposed it? I don't know if you recall that whole discussion that there was no time period specified in our rules. MR. WHITE: I'm not sure if Ms. Arnold is saying something different than what our general understanding is. I hope not. MS. ARNOLD: No. MR. WHITE: We're all in agreement then. That's fine. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So we need to make a ruling as to whether or not to impose these fines. MR. WHITE: Madam Chair, I believe that I hopefully have an opportunity to -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm going to let you speak now. MR. WHITE: Thank you. My first objection is a procedural one, and it goes to the rules and regulations of this board. And what I'm suggesting to you is that -- and I don't know if the rules and regulations that are out front on the table are the current rules or not? Page 177 1616 3 November 29,2007 MR. KELLY: They're the current rules aside from two small changes, and I believe those are highlighted or underlined. They're underlined. MR. WHITE: In the document that's out there? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes, that's what I understand. MR. WHITE: Then I would direct your attention to what I have a copy of that's Page 8, under Article 10, Roman numeral 10, entitled Enforcement. Is everybody with me? MR. L'ESPERANCE: On Page 10? MR. WHITE: No, no, sir, Page 8, Roman numeral 10. MR. DEAN: What section? MR. WHITE: I'm going to for the moment step over section one and direct your attention to section two. lt says the investigator shall file an affidavit of compliance or noncompliance with the secretary to the board. There are two affidavits of noncompliance in each of the three cases that we're here discussing today. Can someone tell me when those were filed? Because I note that they're dated respectively -- that they were sworn on anyways, June 29th and July 11th. So I just have a question as to when they were filed with the secretary. Is -- Ms. Marku, are you under oath? (The speaker was duly sworn.) MS. MARKU: I would like to state that the affidavits of noncompliance that were provided to me were provided the same date that they were already signed by the investigator and notarized by the investigator. The investigator, Dennis Mazzone, in this case, in the three cases, the date that he dated the affidavit and the date that he notarized the affidavit, he provided me with the original copies. MR. WHITE: So it's your testimony that they were considered filed on those dates? Page 178 rt, , A-- Niember 29, 2007 MS. MARKU: Yes, sir. MR. WHITE: Would it be your duty, Ms. Marku, to send a copy of those affidavits by regular mail as section two states? MS. MARKU: Section two in the rules? MR. WHITE: Yes, ma'am, section two, the second sentence reads: Copy of said affidavit shall be sent to the violator by regular U.S. Mail and recorded in the public records of Collier County, Florida. And then thirdly, the secretary to the board shall report the status of the said affidavit at the next scheduled board meeting. Was there a -- MR. L'ESPERANCE: I'm not reading those provisions in my copy. MR. PONTE: I didn't see that. Where are we? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I think you have a different copy than we do. MR. WHITE: I have what was out front. I apologize, board members. (Discussion was held off the record.) MR. WHITE: Then can we go back on the record? MS. ARNOLD: What he's reading from is the one that has actually been approved by the board. The one that you have in your packet, it hasn't been approved by the board, and so that's why-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: There were some changes on this one, that's why we were all looking, going we can't find it, so -- MR. WHITE: Well, the one that I'm reading from -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's the one that is actually the approved one. So we just went out and got some copies for everybody, so -- are there any more out there? Let's go back to Page 8. MR. LEFEBVRE: Page 8, you said, section ten? 16' A 3 November 29,2007 MS. ARNOLD: Article ten. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: lt's article ten, section two. Now we're all on the same page. MR. WHITE: Thank you. MR. WRIGHT: I would object to this line of questioning about the issuance of the affidavit and the ordering of the affidavit. The relevant information that you should be looking at is in section three. I would just say section three, actually. MR. WHITE: That's a request for a reduction or abatement of fines. MR. LEFEBVRE: These are rules we haven't voted on, correct? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Correct. MR. LEFEBVRE: So then why are we looking at this? MR. WHITE: The copy that I have -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The one that's out front is the current copy that we have voted on. The one that's in our packet is the one that we have not voted on. MR. WHITE: I may get confused if this keeps up. I'm sorry for that. Because I'm just trying to follow the rules. That's my job is to help us all. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That was our misunderstanding because we're all looking at the ones we haven't even voted on yet tonight. MR. WHITE: Then we're agreed as to what article ten, section two says under the heading Enforcement. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Should be sent to the violator regular U.S. Mail and recorded public records -- sorry. lt says that a copy of said affidavit shall be sent to the violator by regular U.S. Mail and recorded in the public records of Collier County, Florida. The secretary to the board shall report the status of the said affidavit at the next scheduled board meeting. MR. WHITE: Thank you for putting it into the record. Page 180 16 , ~r"2 Noven1ter 29,2007 And so I just return to my question, if! may. Ms. Marku, was there a point in time at which you sent a copy of the affidavits of July MR. WRIGHT: Objection. This is irrelevant to the question of whether or not to reduce the amount of the lien. MR. WHITE: The question is whether they should be imposed or not. There is no lien. MS. MARKU: There is no amount oftime where it states in the rules that I have to provide you with -- that I have to provide the respondent with a copy of the affidavit. Also, this case has been going on in a continuance, have been put on the agenda, I removed off the agenda, so -- and these affidavits has been part of the exhibits. MR. WHITE: They're part of the exhibits of to day's -- MS. MARKU: Today, and last hearing when it was continuance. MS. ARNOLD: Patrick, the process has been-- MR. WHITE: Michelle, I think I can understand how to read the rules, and I'm just trying to ask some questions about whether your staff has followed the process, whether the county -- MS. ARNOLD: And I'm trying to answer-- MR. WHITE: -- can at this point lawfully impose fines. MS. ARNOLD: I'm trying to answer your question, Patrick. MR. WHITE: I did not ask a question of you, Michelle, I asked a question of Ms. Marku. MS. ARNOLD: And she replied to your question. Can I explain the -- MR. WHITE: And I would like to ask her some more questions about that answer, if! may, please. May I inquire, Madam Chair? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Go. MR. WHITE: Thank you. So Ms. Marku, let me see if I understand. Is it your testimony Page 181 ~" 16 I ANoJnber 29, 2007 that you never sent a copy of the affidavit to the Blockers by regular mail? MS. MARKU: No, I have not. MR. WHITE: Did you at any point in time record in the public record of the county those affidavits? MS. MARKU: No, I have not. MR. WHITE: And was there a point in time at which you as the secretary to the board reported the status of those affidavits from July and June, at whatever would have been the next then scheduled board meeting? MS. MARKU: I have placed these copies of the affidavit on the exhibits that the board members have received from last month's agenda that they were -- you had a motion for continuance. lt was in their packets, as well in these packets again. And it does not state on the rules that it has to be a specific amount of time where I would have to send these affidavits to the respondents. MR. WHITE: Well, that was my first question, which I thought you previously answered that you had not. The third question had to with whether you reported the status of them at the next board meeting. That would be the board meeting following June 29th and July 11th, which would have been the meeting at the end of July, as far as I know. And so my question is, did you report those affidavits at the end of July, 20077 MS. MARKU: And then my answer again is that they were on the packets of the board members. MR. WHITE: For which month? MS. MARKU: lt was for the last month. MR. WHITE: For October? MS. MARKU: Yes. MR. WHITE: And for November. Page 182 yo"'"'" N1veJer 29,2007 MS. MARKU: Yes. MR. WHITE: So it's fair to say they were not part of the packets for July then? MS. MARKU: I have to go back and see if you were -- if you were on the agenda in July, then yes, they were. MR. WHITE: lt's okay to say you don't know. I'm not trying to make this torturous, believe me. I just need to get on the record that there is a noncompliance with this board's own rules about providing affidavits of noncompliance. MS. ARNOLD: And I would have to object, because Patrick White knows that he has requested continuances prior to coming to this board so we were unable as staff to place this on the agenda for your consideration the following month based on his continuances. MR. WHITE: There are two separate issues of whether the affidavits of noncompliance are reported -- MS. ARNOLD: And because he's not allowing me to tell him what the procedures are, I can't explain to him why those affidavits weren't put on there. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Michelle, I'm going to ask you to go ahead and explain the procedures to me. MS. ARNOLD: Well, the normal procedures are once -- and they are normally placed on the agenda the next month after being filed with the secretary and then recorded after the board's action has been taken. But because this particular -- and we do imposition of fines timely, because the affidavits are requested at the time your specific actions are so noted in your order. And in this particular case, you've got several different actions to be taken. So the affidavits were filed, provided to the secretary to the board. She attempted to place them on your agenda so that you would have an update. Several requests were made for continuances, so I've asked her not to place them on the agenda prior to your being asked that yourself. Page 183 16 , ~ lovember 29, 2007 So that was the reason at our last hearing that we asked that that be the final request for continuance that was being granted for this particular case, or these cases, because there's been numerous requests that have been granted for this case, and that's the only reason why you weren't able to consider them prior to today. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Jean? MS. RAWSON: Yes. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Because apparently there has been a difference on how we've handled this case because of the continuances -- MS. RAWSON: Correct. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: -- we have apparently not given the defendant -- his affidavit has not been mailed to him. MS. RAWSON: lt usually goes out with the packet that you get that they get. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: So he would have received it last month then. MS. RAWSON: He should have. MR. WHITE: No, he did not. MS. RAWSON: lt's in your packet. They get the same packet you do. MS. ARNOLD: What I had indicated is that they would get it after your consideration. But you've never considered it. So apparently it was never mailed to them. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, so they haven't actually received an affidavit then? MS. MARKU: They have received an affidavit. Yesterday I -- if I recall correctly, I had a public request from Mr. White's office to have the packet of evidence, these exhibits, and she has received those. MR. WHITE: And the reason we asked is because we hadn't received them, they hadn't been provided by mail. Page 184 ,'~ 'Z - Novetf1ber 29, 2007 Now, we're talking about the third of those three things, and the first of them. But the one that I think is most problematic for this procedure is the fact that they were never recorded. And certainly I would suggest that if your rules require something be done and it's not done, that it's premature and inappropriate for you to consider imposing fines today. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Jean? MS. RAWSON : You know, I'm going to let Mr. Wright speak here. I'm not sure that one has a whole lot to do with the other, honestly. You know, the liens and fines are going to continue to accrue from the June date and from the July date, you know. If you impose them today or if you impose them next month because now we gave them a copy of the affidavit, I mean, they're just going to keep going. MR. WHITE: Like I said, we skipped over section one. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I understand. Mr. Wright? MR. WRIGHT: I just want to point out that compliance is no longer at issue. Everybody knows, including Mr. White, that it's not in compliance. So the fact -- MR. WHITE: I object to Mr. Wright putting words in my mouth. I wish you would stop. MR. WRIGHT: I apologize, maybe it is in compliance, in which case we should be made aware of that. But we haven't been made aware of that. So far, based on what I've heard and what I've seen, the property is not in compliance, and I think that's consistent with your order as well. Now, whether or not there was a mailing of an affidavit, I trust that Bendisa put together the appropriate packages and sent it to them. Regardless of that, compliance is not at issue in this instant matter which you're considering, which is whether or not to impose a lien. There's already been a finding of noncompliance. There hasn't been a finding of compliance. Page 185 1'61 AoveJer 29,2007 So to get run off the path on this red herring is just going to take up more of your time. And I would just suggest that you focus specially whether or not to impose a lien and give him the courtesy of, as he's requested, considering factors for mitigation of the fine. MR. WHITE: Certainly the first of those would be whether the county itself complied with its own rules. And I find it somewhat astounding that a member of the Bar would suggest to you that you don't have to follow your rules, that you should just rush to judgment __ if! may be like you and put some words in your mouth -- and impose fines without having any discussion about whether or not there has been compliance, or efforts towards compliance, or what the gravity of the violations may be. There are a set of factors that are supposed to be evaluated. And I'm prepared to put on evidence about those things for you in an effort CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I would like you to move forward on that then and give us some of that information because I'm getting tired of listening to everything but the information that should be pertinent to whether or not we have a fine imposed. MR. WHITE: I appreciate your frustration, Madam Chair, believe me, I really do. I would object that we are not procedurally in a proper position to be able to consider the imposition of fines unless and until at the minimum those affidavits are recorded in the public records. Your rules require it, it's not been done. I don't know how you can get to the point of going ahead with the process when it hasn't been complied with under your own rules. MS. ARNOLD: Can I say something? That these rules are guidelines for you, and you all as the board being your rules have the discretion whether or not to accept or require all those actions to be taken. As Bendisa pointed out, there's no timeline specified ofthe recording of the liens -- of the affidavits. So I mean, I'm not sure Page 186 ,.51 ~ov~ber29,2007 where Mr. White is coming from that they have to first be recorded in the public records before you all consider imposing those fines. And if they're recorded, as Jeff Wright indicated, so what? They're still in noncompliance. The fines still continue to accrue. You all just need to make a determination whether or not you want to impose today or we'll bring it back again in another month for you to impose, because I don't think we're going to get anywhere closer to compliance. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I want to find out why he thinks he should -- besides the affidavit issue, because I don't think it falls into play here, to be honest, because there is no time frame where it says in our -- it says it needs to be filed, it doesn't say when. I would like to move forward and listen to what he has to say in regards to why we shouldn't impose the fines at this time. Because he says he has arguments in that regard. If I don't hear that information, then I'm going to stop this proceeding and I'm going to ask the board to make a decision. MR. WHITE: Thank you, Madam Chair, I'm happy to move forward. But I'm noting my procedural concern for the record. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I understand. MR. WHITE: Thank you. The first thing I'd ask you to do is kind of go back to where we were before. The gravity of the violation here, I think, has largely to do with the public health, safety, welfare concerns that this board saw with respect to the adjacent property. And the photographs that were provided to you and are part of the record indicate clearly that there has been significant clean-up and that largely all of those materials that were offensive and obnoxious and were a nuisance accumulation have been removed from the property line and are in the process of continuing to be cleaned up. And I believe that as to the extent of any violation in terms of this board feeling that there was a health, safety, welfare concern, that it has been mitigated. And I would ask that the fine amounts certainly Page 187 16 I ~ov~er 29,2007 should reflect that. There are other concerns I have about the affidavit of noncompliance. And Mr. Mazzone is here and if! may ask him a few questions, please, about it? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. Mazzone. You have to swear him in, Cherie'. (Speaker was duly sworn.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Before we start, we're having to lose another member because he has to be elsewhere. So we'll say good-bye to George. Merry Christmas, George. MR. PONTE: Merry Christmas. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We might still be here. (Mr. Ponte leaves the room.) MR. WHITE: I was hoping for New Year's, actually. MS. RAWSON: You're going to lose your attorney very shortly, because I'm catching a plane. So, Mr. White -- MR. WHITE: Trust me, I had somewhere else I had to be at 3:00 as well. MS. RAWSON: We're probably going to have to really -- because they can't do without me. So let's get this done. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Go ahead, Mr. White. MR. WHITE: Thank you. Mr. Mazzone, you're the one that prepared the June 29th and July 11 th affidavits, and do you have a copy of one of those in front of you? MR. MAZZONE: I do not. MR. WHITE: Could someone provide him with a copy, please. MR. MAZZONE: I have those now. MR. WHITE: In paragraph number three of the June 29th affidavit, you make the statement that -- in the second sentence that the respondent has not complied with paragraph nine by not having acted with due diligence in pursuit of a rezone of property in question by June 29th. Page 188 " 161A ~ Novefuber 29,2007 What actions did you take to determine that my clients had not used due diligence? MR. MAZZONE: I had spoken to a planner who was in charge of that project and they had stated that there had been no progress made, they have not heard back from you. MR. WHITE: Did that individual also tell you, Mr. Mazzone, that we weren't able to file for a rezoning because we did not have a comprehensive plan amendment? MR. MAZZONE: I don't believe they mentioned that. MR. WHITE: But it is your understanding that one is required? MR. MAZZONE: Correct. MR. WHITE: So is it fair to say that no matter what degree of diligence my clients would have used, there was no way they could have obtained a rezoning by June 29th because they did not have a comprehensive plan amendment? I mean, is that a fair statement? MR. MAZZONE: I think that's a statement. I believe that the process of going through a rezone, in my heart of hearts, was one that was just a delay tactic. MR. WHITE: I understand. I've heard that from others before. Thank you for your opinion. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. White, I've got a question. I think all of this information that you're presenting would be really good for an abatement of fines if it were imposed at a later time. I would -- MR. WHITE: lt goes to the second factor ma'am, that says any actions taken by the violator to correct the violation. My point is simply this: There were no actions we could take to rezone the property because we're legally precluded from doing so because we did not have a comprehensive plan amendment. Nor did this board afford us time to get one. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Which is what I'm stating is, I Page 189 16' 1"-:1., nove~er 29, 2007 think it would be a better argument for an abatement. Michelle? MS. ARNOLD: As I noted earlier, Mr. White indicated that he was told at that preap. meeting that he needed a compo plan amendment in order to pursue a rezone. He could have at that time come back to the board and asked for additional time. He could have at that time submitted a compo plan amendment request and started pursuing something towards the rezone, but neither of those avenues were taken. MR. WHITE: May I respond, Madam Chair, in kind? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Yes. MR. WHITE: No one from code enforcement came to you either when they recognized that there was a problem. Instead they rely upon my client to come back here. And we did. But we felt it was in our best interest to not come back to you all until we had done what we could under the other factor that says what can we do to abate the violation that you were concerned about as far as the health, safety, welfare concern. And it has taken our best efforts until the end of this month to get those things in place. So I ask you, was that fair? The second point that Michelle made was that we haven't filed for a small-scale amendment. Well, what we have done in the alternative, as my motion indicated and I think as some of the testimony has been stated thus far, is that my clients are actively involved in the Immokalee master plan restudy process, and routinely attend the master plan visioning committee meetings. So I fail to understand why the county's failure to come forward and look to correct an order which they recognize is a problem because it doesn't give time to get a compo plan amendment suddenly becomes my client's problem. MS. ARNOLD: And I would object. I've never said that. I Page 190 I 6-' ~ ~ Novemt1er 29,2007 believe your order was -- can I just speak to the comment about -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Actually, the board's getting a little bit leery. MS. ARNOLD: Can I just make one comment, speak to the abatement of the health, safety? lt was Mr. White's testimony previously, I believe, that he indicated that the site improvement plan process would afford his clients to come into compliance and allow them to replace some units that are currently on there. I would argue that the reason some of those units needs to be replaced is because they're not completely up to code. MR. WHITE: There's no evidence of that, ma'am. MS. ARNOLD: Well, I'm just kind of repeating what -- there would be no reason for replacement -- MR. WHITE: No, I was simply indicating-- MS. ARNOLD: -- if these units were 100 percent health, safety without health, safety concerns. MR. WHITE: There's a large difference between them being sufficient for human occupancy, and that was the other document I was seeking to give you from HRS. MR. DEAN: You're out of compliance. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm done. Right now it is out of compliance. lt has not come into compliance. I will grant that the respondent has done some due diligence in trying to bring it -- get it to where he can bring it into a compliance in the manner that he wants. I'm going to close it. I think I've heard enough. lt may not be to your liking, but we need to move forward, because we're about ready to lose our attorney and we won't be able to finish the rest of our cases for the day. MR. WHITE: Madam Chair, I'm prepared to come back at any point in time when you have a quorum and an attorney. MR. DEAN: Motion to close the public. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. Page 191 ........ 1 ~, . ~ov3ber 29, 2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: There's been a motion from the board member to close the public hearing, and a second. MR. WHITE: Just note for the record -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. MR. WHITE: I just note for the record there were at least two other factors -- MR. DEAN: lt's closed-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I understood. MR. WHITE: Mr. Dean, I believe I have the right to put on the record for me to appeal -- MR. DEAN: Sir, we closed the meeting for the public. You've talked for two and a half hours, sir. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Mr. White, I understand that you have two other points that you would have liked to have brought up, and I will put it on the record for you. And that should close it. MR. WHITE: lt does. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm looking for whether or not to impose the fines. MR. LEFEBVRE: I make a motion to impose the fines. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do I hear a second? MR. MORGAN: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. Page 192 '.'''' ill 16 IIJ No1mber 29,2007 MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. At this time we're imposing the fines. However, as I stated, you have the right to come back and ask for abatement once you come into compliance, however long that takes. MR. WHITE: As long as it doesn't take more than three months. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And at that time frame, your arguments would weight heavy. I will tell you that. Okay? MR. WHITE: I appreciate knowing that, and I would just want to say for the record that as far as the imposition of fines and the dollar amounts, I believe that they are in excess of what is necessary to get us to compliance. Weare doing things and have demonstrated to you that we have done things -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Come back at the time you come into compliance and use that argument, sir. I'm not saying you have to pay it at this time, I'm saying come into compliance and come back to us and we will look at abating some of them. MR. WHITE: You understand that that's at least three years away. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That may be. Thank you. MR. WHITE: Thank you. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The next case is Board of County Commissioners versus Alfredo and Miradis Miralles. MS. ARNOLD: This case was actually on your agenda last month, and Mr. Miralles came, and there was question about whether or not it was clear that he needed to paint over the shadowing, I believe, of the sign. And you gave him additional time before abating -- imposing the fines. Page 193 ......1. 16 , ~ N3ember 29, 2007 The violation has been abated. He did it the next day . We went and verified that. So it's up to you all whether or not you want to impose the fines that were accrued at that point. That was from September 7th, 2007 through October 29th, 2007 for a total of 52 days at a rate of$IOO per day, $5,200. There is an additional $335.67 for operational costs. None of any of the fines or operational costs have been paid. I don't know if you recall at your last hearing as well, there were several other items I believe on -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I don't recall because I wasn't here. But does Mr. Snow have an opinion on this particular case? (Speaker was duly sworn.) MR. SNOW: Investigator Kitchell Snow for the record. No ma'am, we have -- if the board would decide leniency on this matter. lt was just a small matter of painting the shadowing, and we would have no objection to any reduction of fines. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: He found that out and then he took care of it the next day. MR. SNOW: He took care of it the next day. And they were doing a lot of work up there on it. You weren't here, Madam Chair, but they were working on another property. They did everything else but just the shadowing, and he did it the next Monday, right after when the board ordered. So we would have no objection to any reduction. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'll close the public hearing then. Wait, Michelle had one more thing to say. Okay. MS. ARNOLD: I just wanted to note that there is one other case that you all did consider with Mr. Miralles. He did have operational costs for that, and those haven't been paid either. So maybe some time period could be placed on -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: When he has to pay -- MS. ARNOLD: When he has to pay whatever he has to pay. And if you are reducing it, if it's not paid timely, then maybe some Page 194 1,-'. &J ti' (" :! ;1 ~ 3 November 29, 2007 consideration should be given to bumping it back up to what the original amount was. MR. KELLY: I'll make a motion that we impose operational costs of$335.67 to be paid within 30 days. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: If it's not paid within 30 days? MR. KELL Y: Can we do anything with operational costs as far as -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: No. We can go back to adding some of the fine back, though. Michelle had asked that if they didn't pay what he asked them to pay, operational costs, that we then go back to incurring some of the fine. So I was just telling him that that's what he ought to consider. MR. KELLY: In my motion, we would impose operational costs of$335.67 to be paid within 30 days or a civil penalty of$I,500 would be imposed. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second the motion. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. Does that work? MS. ARNOLD: So essentially you're abating the fine, and if not __ if the operational cost is not paid within 30 days, the fine of$I,500 would be imposed, correct? MR. KELLY: Yes, ma'am. And the reason why I said that, it's not a number I pulled out of the air. In the stipulated agreement, there was, because it was a repeated violation, a $1,500 civil penalty. I think Page 195 16/ J1 .3 November 29,2007 that's part of the same -- MS. ARNOLD: No. MR. KELLY: I have a copy of their stipulated agreement. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That was in the original. MS. ARNOLD: That's what I was going to say. We've had other cases with Mr. Miralles, and I don't believe it's the same case that you MR. KELLY: Okay, so this wasn't supposed to be in our packet then? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Anyway. MR. KELLY: Well, anyways, that's-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's why he pulled it out. MR. KELLY: That's why I picked that number. MR. L'ESPERANCE: lt's still a good number. MS. ARNOLD: That wasn't supposed to be there. I caught that too. MR. MORGAN: I caught one too. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: That's okay, it was a good number and we went with it, so continue. Okay, I believe next is a request to forward to the county attorney's office. BCC verse EJ. Properties LLC. Leonardo D. Starke, Esquire. MR. DEAN: I make a motion we move this to foreclosure. MR. KELL Y: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And then there was a second. All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Page 196 l",A ~ ~ovember1'9, 2007 Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The next one being Board of County Commissioners versus Patrice E. Savignano. MR. KELLY: They went together. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: They went together? Oh, he sent them together, I'm sorry. MS. ARNOLD: There's a memo, that was what I was searching for, that you all should have received, that just lists the properties that have passed the three-month time period that need to be forwarded for action before the -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: We're sending them both to the-- MS. ARNOLD: County attorney. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay, new business. Code Enforcement Board rules and regs. And I had one little item on the new ones. MR. LEFEBVRE: I don't know where I got that in my packet. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: lt was in your packet. MR. LEFEBVRE: I got mine yesterday. So I'm not sure where it should be or where it was. MR. DEAN: What's the number you're looking for? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: lt was on Page 2, article five, section two. I just need to scratch out a couple of words, if everybody agrees, because we're planning on not having a meeting in December. And according to our rules, and we want to make sure we're going to comply with our rules, the regular meetings, regular meetings of the Code Enforcement Board shall be held at least monthly. And seeing that we're skipping a month, we need to strike out that at least monthly and just say on the fourth Thursday and/or at times and places as needed determined by the board in the Board of County Commissioners chambers. And leave it alone. Ifthat's okay with everybody? Page 197 l~,A ~ }:(ovember 19, 2007 MR. DEAN: He says if you miss two out of three consecutive-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: No, no, no, no. We're on page -- MR. DEAN: You said Page 2. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Section two, held at least monthly. MR. DEAN: Okay. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Madam Chair, I would concur with your recommendation. MR. LEFEBVRE: lt says place -- okay. MR. DEAN: I thought the answer came with 4-B. lt says succeSSIve. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I'm just wanting to make sure that we have the right to skip a meeting if we need to for holidays or whatever, no ability to have one because we have no room to have one, whatever the case may be. MR. DEAN: At least monthly except for holidays. MR. LEFEBVRE: Let's go to the next -- the comma after Thursday, and/or at other times and places needed and determined by the board in the Collier County commission chambers. That's contradictory. lt's saying that you can only have it in-- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: At the chambers. MR. LEFEBVRE: Right. But in the sentence before, in that same sentence it says and/or at other places and times. MR. L'ESPERANCE: That's not exclusionary, it's inclusive. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: lt's and/or. All right, move on. Michelle, you had this brought up to us because of a few changes? MS. ARNOLD: Yes. We have highlighted in article six of your agenda just some minor things to reflect really what you're doing currently on your agenda. Order of business. And that would be to insert A, motions for imposition of fines under old business. Motion for Page 198 .. ~~vlm~r 2~2007 reduction/abatement of fines, and to include in there also under item seven, a consent agenda item, clarifying that those would be motions for imposition of fines where the respondent is not present. That was something that you all -- you weren't here -- requested to be considered, you know, since some ofthese things are so routine. Once you approve the agenda the consent agenda items are also being approved. If the respondents are here for those motions for imposition of fines, obviously we would have it under old business and they would be afforded the opportunity to speak. Same thing for -- well, for the items requesting county attorney's action. So those would be -- and the other reason for bringing this back is number seven. We actually attempted to put this on the Board of County Commissioners' agenda, and it's been pulled because there was some language that currently is in your rules that the county manager felt is in conflict with his ordinance. So the suggestion is to modify paragraph P, which is on Page 7, to reflect actually what the statute says is that the board shall notify the local governing body, which may make all reasonable repairs required to bring the property into compliance. And this would apply to when you're giving us authorization to demolish something or to clean up the litter or to tow, whatever. So instead of you giving us direction, you're really saying okay, we're notifying you, you can go ahead and do this if you find fit. And we've coordinated something with the county manager's office that he would look at those things. Is that the only thing? Did you have anything, Jeff? MR. WRIGHT: Nothing. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Do we need to make a vote on this then? MR. KELLY: Yeah. I make a motion we accept the changes. Page 199 16' A" November 29, ~07 MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) MR. KELL Y: Under new business, can I add one thing in real quick? Since Gerald had to resign in order to seek public office and he was our vice chair, I don't think that it's fair that I stay as vice chair. I was wondering if it would be okay to step down and to allow Gerald the opportunity to continue out the rest of his term as we originally voted. If that's the will of the board. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Is there any objection or comments? MR. DEAN: Gerald, do you still want to be the vice chair, sir? MR. LEFEBVRE: Sure, yes. MR. DEAN: And you want to do that, sir? MR. KELLY: Yes. MR. DEAN: I'll make the motion that Gerald Lefebvre become the vice chair and Mr. Kelly is stepping down. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Need a second. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. Page 200 1~" 3 November 29, 2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Aye. Any supposed? (No response.) CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Okay. MS. ARNOLD: Can I just add one other comment? Oftentimes the respondent, although they're supposed to give their packets to us in advance, they don't do that, and we just kind of as a routine accept it and the county's not ever seen it. I just request that the board afford us the opportunity to review it before, just as we do for them. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: I tried to do that today when I was cognizant of the fact you didn't get them. Okay, do we have any other? MR. DEAN: Affirmative defense. MR. WRIGHT: I'll try to limit this to a minute or so. Jeff Wright for the county attorney's office. There's a new consolidated Code Enforcement ordinance, as you probably are all aware of. lt's Ordinance No. 2007-44. And that ordinance is 14 pages long. On the 14th page, under article six, is Affirmative Defense. And that affirmative defense provision provides basically that you go to the building official, and I will read directly from that paragraph. lt shall be a complete defense to a code enforcement action, and I'm paraphrasing here, if you are able to demonstrate to the building official as defined by the Florida Building Code, by a preponderance of the evidence. So basically, anybody that wants to use this particular defense has to go to the building official, who has his own scale and is trying to weigh by a preponderance of the evidence. So we've run into some questions on how does the average person coming through the door at CDES invoke this affirmative defense. And I wanted to give you all this information and also the public the information. There is a person in the lobby right now, Carol Page 201 JO~!b~ 29'-~07 Stachura, probably not much longer, but Carol Stachura, who is answering questions directly related to this affirmative defense. And also, the building department is putting together a formal policy that they'll publish and have up front for people to look at so they'll know exactly what they need to do to invoke this defense. And I would ask if anybody has any questions. We want to kind of promote this to people so they don't realize it halfway through their case that they had this option. So we want to make it known that people have this available to them. So if you have any questions, call our office, the county attorney's office. Our number is 774-8400. Or you can call the permitting hotline. I don't have the number here, but the contact person is Carol Stachura, S-T-A-C-H-U-R-A. And I apologize if! went over time, but that's all I have. MS. ARNOLD: I just have one other announcement. The special magistrate is going to be conducting a public forum on January 30th? MS. MARKU: 31st. MS. ARNOLD: 31st. And it's for the public. She would love it if you all would attend as well. And it's -- trying to make announcements in as many places as possible so that we have pretty good attendance. And the idea behind it is just to give the public some understanding of that process, which is very similar to this process. And we're going to try to have like some mock hearings so that the public, if they choose to participate, they can kind of understand by being placed in certain __ you know, a situation of a respondent or a situation ofthe investigator to try to get an idea of what the process is all about and what's expected of people that are attending that process. So it's January 31st, and it's going to be in the Board of County Commissioners' chambers. MR. DEAN: Sounds like fun. Maybe we'll go into the New Year MS. ARNOLD: I know, it does sound like fun. Page 202 16 L~: ~ Noveni~er ~ 2007 CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Time frame? MS. ARNOLD: 9:00? Or is it 8:30? MS. MARKU: 9:00. MS. ARNOLD: 9:00. MR. LEFEBVRE: The other thing is, maybe we can all pull our packages out for Emma Houston since we're probably going to re-see this next -- CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: There's a couple of them, actually. I didn't do that, that's in the pile. MR. LEFEBVRE: But maybe just to save -- MS. ARNOLD: Thank you so much for doing that. MR. LEFEBVRE: -- some time and money. MR. DEAN: You said January 31st? MR. LEFEBVRE: Which was the other case? CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: The Skyles. MR. LEFEBVRE: What was it, Styles? MS. RAWSON: Van Slykes. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: And with that, do we-- MR. DEAN: I make a motion to adjourn. MR. KELL Y: Second. CHAIRWOMAN BARNETT: Thank you. All those in favor? MR. MORGAN: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. LESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KELLY: Aye. 1~1 A "Z November 29,2007 ***** There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 4:30 p.m. COLLIER COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD 1L- 13~ SHERI BARNETT, Chairman These minutes approved by the Board on ~ ~ 't) :2 0 07 as presented ~ or as corrected TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC. BY CHERIE' NOTTINGHAM Page 204 ':iaI8 ___\I~..I:'-...L_ Ha!as -- ;fi#----- Hennlng._~.. __.~ ;oyle_. ~___ ~()!ettfl . ..._m'" ____. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 AM., THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 2008, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BillLDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA: 16/ ,if " ;,"~ '.:~ '.?r AGENDA NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM, INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN, PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING, IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE A V AILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE, ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. L PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY 3, ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 4, PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES 5, APPROVAL OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, LDC MEETING; DECEMBER 13, LDC MEETING; DECEMBER 20, REGULAR MEETING; 6. BCC REPORT- RECAPS - Not Available at this time 7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 8, CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A, Petition: CU-2007-AR-12384, Enterprise Leasing Company d/b/a Enterprise Rent-a-Car, applicant and owner, is requesting a Conditional Use pursuant to LDC Section 2,04.03 for a rental car agency within the C-4 zoning district The subject property is located 13560 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 8, Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, (Coordinator: Willie Brown) 9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Petition: PUDZ-2006-AR-lOI71, Eastbourne Bonita, LLC, represented by Laura Spurgeon, of Jolmson Engineering, Inc., and Patrick G, White, Atty. of Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, LLP., requesting a rezone from the Agricultural (A) and Special Treatment (ST) Overlay Zoning District to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for project known as Brandon RPUD, for the development of 204 single- family and multi-family residential units, The subject property, consisting of 5 LI acres,..~ located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memoria~~~, Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Melissa Zone)CONTINJJ~.p FROM 1117/08 Date II { III ~ 1 Item#: / 'G~'2S to 16 I ~j'''~A 4 B. Petition: CU-2007-AR- 11394, The Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, represented by Matthew Vasilevski of Wedding, Stephenson, and Ibarguen, Architects, Inc" is proposing a Conditional Use of the Commercial Professional and General Office (C-I) Zoning District with a SR29 Commercial Subdistrict Overlay (C-I-SR29-COSD) and the RSF-3 (Residential Single-Family) Zoning District for ChurchIPlace of Worship, allowed pursuant to LDC Section 2,04,03, Table 2. The 16.8-acre site is located at 635 State Road 29, in Section 32, To,,",ship 46 South, Range 29 East, Immokalee, Collier County, Florida, (Coordinator: John-David Moss) C Petition: PUDZ-2007-AR-12248, Sabal Palm Development, LLC, represented by Robert L. Duane, AICP, of Hole Montes, Inc, and Richard D, Yovanovich ofGoodlette, Coleman, and Johnson, requesting a rezone from the Agricultural (A) to the Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Zoning District for project to be leno,,", as Napoli Village. The +/-8.97- acre site is proposed to pennit an adult congregate living facility, comprising two four-stOl)' buildings. The subject site is located east of Tamiami Trail North (US 41), west of Sterling Oaks PUD, and north of the Community Congregational Church, at 15450 Tamiami Trail North, in Section 9, To,,",ship 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: John-David Moss) 10, OLD BUSINESS I L NEW BUSINESS A The CCPC requests to have a progress report be given to them concerning the EAR based LDC amendments pertaining to Policy 6.2.5 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element I I. PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM 12, DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 13, ADJOURN 2/7 108CCPC Agenda/RB/sp/mm 2 RECEIVED 16 I A ! 4' FEB 0 6 2008 November 28, 2007 hOdr(i of COUilty Commissionejs TRANSCRIPT OF THE LDC MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COM~ISS~~w If" Naples Florida Fiala - .~ , Halas ~- November 28, 2007 ~enl1ing1f~ (~ voyle - - -<Z'.--. Coletta ---- LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 8:30 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Mark Strain Lindy Adelstein Donna Reed-Caron Tor Kolflat Paul Midney Bob Murray Brad Schiffer Robert Vigliotti ALSO PRESENT: Jeffrey Klatzkow, Chief Asst. County Attorney Catherine Fabacher, LDC Manager Joseph Schmitt, CDES Administrator Misc.Cooes: Iv I A tf Date: Item': Page 1 Copies to: / J 1 6" A" J.: November~, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Microphones are on, everybody. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Let's rise. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Just a minute. No, no, no, no, no. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: We felt like getting up, it's okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good morning. And welcome to the Collier County Planning Commission meeting, November 28th, the 2007 Cycle 2 land development code hearings. Hopefully we'll start today and hopefully be done before today's over, but maybe not, depending on the timing. So if you'll all please rise for the pledge of allegiance. (Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. And will the secretary please do the roll call. COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Kolflat. COMMISSIONER KOLFLAT: Here. COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Schiffer. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'm here. COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Midney. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Here. COMMISSIONER CARON: Ms. Caron is here. Mr. Strain. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Here. COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Adelstein. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Here. COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Murray. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Here. COMMISSIONER CARON: And Mr. Vigliotti. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Here. COMMISSIONER CARON: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Addenda to the agenda. And we're basically going to take the book in order. Originally we take in order of when staffs here to present their particular issues. Although I notice Page 2 " ~ I, r '-" ttJ 16& ;-,.~.,. November 28, 2007 that there are members of the public here. And our first goal has always been to try to accommodate the public. So we will defer to the public sections, provided staff are here as well. Ifthey're not, we'll have to ask staff to come over, so while the public's here, we can finish that up today, while members ofthe public are here to speak. And maybe, Cormac, and Ellie, if the two of you could just come to the microphone for a minute and tell us what sections you're here for, and we'll try to make sure staffs here and we can put those first on the agenda today. MR. GIBLIN: For the record, Cormac Giblin. I'm here for the -- I believe it's the second amendment in your packet. It's on Page 3. lt is LDC Sections 1.08.02 and 2.06.03, the affordable housing density rating system. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Catherine, do you have people here this morning to speak on those? MS. F ABACHER: Right here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, good. We can go forward with those. Okay. MS. KRIER: Good morning. For the record, Ellie Krier. I'm speaking on LDC 5: 103-104, the open house signs for real estate. That's the page number that's showing here. Let's see, 5.06.02, permitted signs. MS. FABACHER: On Page 43 of the packet. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's what I was looking for. MS. KRIER: That I did not know, I apologize. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, no problem. Catherine, do we have staff here who can address that -- MS. F ABACHER: I was hoping Joe was going to show up, but I can address it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, there he is. MS. FABACHER: Well, all right. Page 3 '<0:-""': .. 161A 4 November 28, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, good. Then the first two items on the agenda will be those two in the order just presented to us, if that's -- okay. Now, before we get into the agenda, we have a series of other things to talk about. First of all, our next regular meeting is next Thursday. Our packets are being distributed today. Those of you -- can everybody make it to that meeting? Anybody know if they cannot. (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Looks like we'll have a quorum. The next meeting after that is on the 13th of the month. lt was a special meeting that we scheduled for the Bert Harris claim involving the Cocohatchee project. That still is to go on. Yesterday the BCC talked about it. The outcome of their discussion virtually changes nothing for us. They may call it something different, but we're still going to be doing basically the same thing we were asked to do originally. And I believe Mr. Schmitt has got a tape that he wants us to see in regards to the actions taken on this matter yesterday so we can see verbatim what the BCC is looking for. Catherine? MS. F ABACHER: I wanted to remind you, Mr. Chair, that we have a meeting 5:05 on December 12th, which is our second LDC meeting. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you for that. How about that for everybody, on December 12th, does anybody know -- that's in the evening 5:00. Is everybody okay with that? COMMISSIONER KOLFLA T: I will not be there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Tor, if someone were to pick you up and then drop you back off, would you be able to make it? COMMISSIONER KOLFLA T: Depends who it is. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I know Brad -- I could or Brad Page 4 1 6" ,lI' ~vember 28, 2067 could. Would that work for you? COMMISSIONER KOLFLA T: Fine. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, good. Lindy, are you okay with the 5:05 meeting? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Then we will certainly have that on schedule. And by the way, before we go too far, during the break, which will be at around 10:00, could you have someone from facilities management contacted by that time so that after the break we can know how long we can have this room for. There's been a variety of times, and I understand the room's needed by the legislative delegation at 2:00. I don't understand why they want us out of here at 11 :30 when they're going to take a lunch hour anyway. Why don't we just stay here as long as we can and let them get in here when they need to get in here. MR. SCHMITT: Mr. Chairman, I believe they have to set up the tables down here. They're going to -- the facilities probably have to get in here at least by noon. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: They don't eat lunch? I mean, if they -- MR. SCHMITT: We'll find out when facilities -- but they have to bring the chairs in and set up for the 2:00 meeting. So I'll find out how long you can stay. I thought we could be in here at least until 1 :00. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I thought so, too. And I've heard different times now. And I'm kind of trying to understand why the times are changing the way they are. MR. SCHMITT: We'll check. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And if we seem to be running out of time, I need to finish this cycle in the month of December. So I don't know what it takes to move other people out of this room. I think the only other people that shouldn't be moved is the BCC, Page 5 lo.'t-A" "'4 November 28, 2007 because we can't do that. But other than that, I don't know why we can't have more availability on the times we need to meet to get our work accomplished. So the goal is to get this done in December, and whether we have to meet nights, mornings or part afternoons, I don't know why we can't do that, Joe, if -- MR. SCHMITT: We have four meetings scheduled. Of course the one now will be consumed with the -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Cocohatchee. MR. SCHMITT: Cocohatchee. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. But we also have our regular meetings that we can add onto if we need to if they're short enough. Okay, I believe you were going to show us what occurred yesterday. MR. SCHMITT: I still haven't got it -- this thing will not play it so -- I need to find out why it won't play it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'll tell you what, we can go into a couple of the issues, and then when you get it resolved we'll stop at the end of whatever one we're into and break for this for a minute. Catherine, let's move forward with the first one that Cormac is here for -- MS. F ABACHER: The first one we'll talk about is the affordable housing density bonus rating system. This is a private petition by Wi IsonMiller. Cormac Giblin is here to represent it. lt's on Page 3 of your booklet, Page A of your summary sheets. MR. GIBLIN: Good morning, Commissioners. Cormac Giblin, project manager with Wilson Miller, for the record. I'm here to represent a private petition that is asking basically for three text changes to the LDC, two of them having to do with definitions only . You'll find it on Page 3 of your packet. The county last year adopted an official definition of essential personnel housing, or ESP housing, and that was in response to Page 6 i6 I A b., November 28, 2007 Representative Davis's and the legislature and Governor's passage of the CWHIPP housing program. That program required that the county adopt and pass a definition, a local definition of essential personnel housing. The county did that last year, and it is in its official form. And it currently lives in the local housing assistance plan. (Sound interruption.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is that the BCC meeting? Someone gave you a bogus CD, Joe. MR. SCHMITT: That was not me, that was on cable. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm sorry, Cormac. MR. GIBLIN: That's all right. Some days. The -- so the county has already adopted and incorporated this very definition of essential personnel housing into the local housing assistance plan. What the first part of this amendment does is it brings that same exact definition into the LDC as well, which is where most of the county's legal definitions and land use areas lie. The second part of this definition -- or the second part of this change, on Page 4 in the middle of the page, adds essential personnel housing or essential personnel employer-owned housing to the official definition of affordable workforce housing. Again, kind of just continuing to bring this into the mix of the county's official affordable housing programs. And then the last change can be found on Page 6, a short underlined right underneath the chart, that says that essential service personnel employer-owned housing can also take advantage of the density bonus system at the gap workforce low and very low levels as well. This amendment was brought in response to a desire of major employers in the community wishing to build more affordable workforce housing for their employees. And after looking at the Page 7 i~ ,4 November 28, 2007 ~.., current system, we realized that this change was needed to allow that to happen. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any questions? Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Good morning, Cormac. I have a couple of things on Page 3, just as a little housekeeping thing, under reason, the third line, the word proving. Is that intended to be approving or providing? It doesn't seem to work with proving. MR. GIBLIN: The -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: See the third line of that, under reason. MR. GIBLIN: lt should be providing, providing. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay. You'll want to change that. More importantly, though, I think we may have an issue with, on Pages 4 and 6 where it references employer-owned housing. Part of the coalition -- you have fire departments, they're precluded from owning homes or owning homes for their people, as far as I know under the law. And there are others that would be restricted. Would we not be excluding those organizations that are part of that CWHIPP program and the people we're intending to support in this case by this definition? MR. GIBLIN: I don't --I know that -- I'm not entirely sure about the fire department. I know that the Sheriffs Department is precluded from owning housing. But other members of the coalition, both hospitals in town, the county government, the city government, basically any employer -- and just to -- you do not need to be a member of this coalition that's come together to qualify for this change. It would be any employer that meets this definition, which essentially includes anyone employing someone who earns less than 80 percent of medium Income. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yes, but that's not my question. Page 8 16/ A'4 November 28, 2007 My question is really focused -- I hope is focused effectively for you on the premise of employer-owned. And if there is an issue, even if it pertains to only one group, one organization, such as the sheriff, you may actually be causing a problem unintentionally by using that definition employer-owned. Now, I recognize that some of the CWHIPP, if not all of the CWHIPP intent, and I'm putting that under CWHIPP, there may be others, that they're talking cooperative. And in that context maybe an umbrella group alone. But I'm not trying to get into that. What I'm trying to avoid is the possibility that we'll exclude somebody. I just wonder if you give consideration to that. MR. GIBLIN: If certain organizations' charter or mission precludes them from being able to own housing for their employees, there's not really much that the LDC can do to change that. This is just trying to give that opportunity to those that can avail themselves of it. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: But we'll actually be going against the very intent of what we're trying to do for people then by limiting it right there. MR. GIBLIN: I'm sorry, I'm not quite following. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Well, here, if the intent is to provide, for instance, sheriffs deputies with housing and the sheriff is precluded from having ownership of homes, that entire group will no longer fall into the category here, will it? MR. GIBLIN: I don't see how if they're precluded today how this change negatively impacts them. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And maybe, Mr. Murray, what the clarity needs is that they currently apply under -- if they want to be under the workforce housing category, it's still there and still benefits those categories. This just opens it up to an additional category of Page 9 "lJ 6 I ,~ I .fl. ;1, " l.g. 3 November 28, 2007 employer-owned. They don't have to be employer-owned to be benefiting from the workforce bonuses, it could still be done -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I appreciate that. And I understand. Thank you for the clarification and your premise there. However, I am aware that they are a member of a group that is intending to acquire and have housing for those people. So I think -- whether -- I think it needs to be addressed, certainly, okay. I see something that others may not see, so I'm not sure I can make it any clearer. If you don't agree -- I don't know ifMr. Klatzkow can help in this. I think he's familiar. MR. KLA TZKOW: I've got different issues. I don't really have an issue with what you are raising. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Klatzkow, if you have other issues, what are yours, then? MR. KLA TZKOW: I've got two minor issues. It refers to median. If you go to Page 3, one, two, three, four, five lines down, it says 140 percent of median, it should read median income. The same with the prior line, 120 percent of median income, rather than just median. But my question is -- my real question is, I read the last clause as may be amended from time to time the Collier County Housing Assistance Plan. And Cormac, what I don't understand is are you saying that this LDC definition is going to change depending upon changes to the definition in the Housing Assistance Plan? MR. GIBLIN: What the county's got now is that the state legislature requires that the official definition live in the Housing Assistance Plan, and any updates to it must be made there and then subsequently made here. MR. KLA TZKOW: Why don't we just say then that essential service personnel, and just have the definition, you know, see definition in the Collier County Housing Assistance Plan. Page 10 16/A 4 November 28, 2007 Otherwise, we're going to have to amend this LDC every time we amend the Collier County Housing Assistance Plan. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does that work for you? MR. GIBLIN: That does. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let's do that then. Anybody object to it? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: No, I have a question. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Klatzkow, were you finished? MR. KLATZKOW: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray, I'm sorry, when we went to Mr. Klatzkow I didn't ask you, are you finished? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I guess I am, because I'm not able to make my point. And I apologize for my inability to do so, but there is a point I was attempting to make, and I am concerned, I don't want to go through a whole process of trying to presume to educate everybody here in that. I don't have the ability to do that. I just feel that there is a danger here, that's all. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Cormac, I've got a question in the definitions. Skilled building trades personnel. Is that everyone? Every construction employee can say that they're skilled in a certain manner. So you're saying any construction employee? MR. GIBLIN: That's the way I would interpret the definition. The wording of this definition was actually created by the state legislature and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners last year. And that is the way I would interpret it. Construction industry employees. The goal -- one of the dangers of a definition like this, and I've had some conversations in the past about it, is it does tend to create discrimination or special categories. And I think what we've done here or what the state legislature have done and what we've done additionally to this definition is to try to make it as all-inclusive as possible so as to not try to create anyone special category of Page 11 ]7 it, .: ---.L 't./ 't November 28, 2007 employee. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Okay. MR. GIBLIN: And I think especially the last line in the definition that says and anybody else who happens to be low income in Collier County also qualifies as this. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah, I guess that's where I wanted to go. This is supposed to be a definition of essential service personnel. But there's nobody who's excluded here. Everybody is essential service. MR. GIBLIN: If you're low income, yes. COMMISSIONER CARON: If you're low income, you're essential. MR. GIBLIN: Correct, according to this definition. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: That doesn't make sense. COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay. MR. GIBLIN: And again, this is the existing definition already adopted by the county and approved by the state. So all we were asked to do by staff was to bring this into the LDC for clarification. COMMISSIONER CARON: Additionally, let's go down on Page 4 where you have your definition of employer-owned housing up to 140 percent. Is that in conflict with the term gap housing lower down that goes up to 150 percent? MR. GIBLIN: Gap housing must be owner-occupied up to 150 percent. And employer-owned -- COMMISSIONER CARON: Can only go up-- MR. GIBLIN: To 140. COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay. MR. GIBLIN: And again, that's per state statute. The ESP housing is capped at 140 percent. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Cormac, could you tell us why you think Page 12 1 6" I A l.. Noveml;er 28, 2007 or anybody thinks we need this additional category when it seems to already be covered in the multitude of other categories we already have? MR. GIBLIN: What we have heard in the past is that a major employer in town, an essential service provider employer in town -- take -- just for example, take one ofthe hospitals. They may have a desire to build housing for their employees. To build that housing, they would like to avail themselves of a density bonus to make it affordable and meet their bottom line. Under the current bonus density system they cannot do that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But why, when you've got the percentages there that say household -- if they're going to be within the 140 percent, which is gap, why couldn't they just apply themselves to the gap standards that are already in the table inset? MR. GIBLIN: Because if it's employer-owned, by definition, they're going to be renting it to their employees. Right now the table limits gap and workforce to owner-occupied only. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So we don't have any provisions in our code for rental housing. MR. GIBLIN: Not at those levels. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So what this is doing is introducing rental housing in Collier County. Okay, that makes it a lot clearer as to why it's being -- MR. GIBLIN: As long as it's owned and operated by an essential services personnel provider. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron, then Mr. Schiffer. Mr. Midney, did you want to say something too? COMMISSIONER CARON: So what it is introducing employer-owned, where you can have an income of $84,000 and get these bonuses; is that correct? That would be the 140 percent, right? MR. GIBLIN: Right. And what we see in a lot of job categories in this income area is registered nurses who may be married to a Page 13 16 I v:. No~mber 28, 2007 policeman, combined income, they make the workforce and gap income levels, but still in this market they're having trouble finding something to rent or own. And so the hospitals, the school board, the other major employers in town are seeking active ways to try to provide housing for their employees. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, Mr. Schiffer, then Mr. Midney. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Mr. Klatzkow wants to speak. MR. KLA TZKOW: I don't know what it means. I've read this five times, I still don't know what it means. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Klatzkow, we're trying to struggle with that, too. I'm just wondering though why you're just now saying that to us. MR. KLATZKOW: I'm just -- I've been listening to the explanations and I still don't understand what this means. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Wasn't this supposed to be reviewed by all departments before it got here today? I mean, legal, too? MR. KLATZKOW: lt is a private amendment, and he's coming forward. And on a private amendment we let the private petitioner come forward and have their day. And what I'm telling you is I don't know what it means and I don't understand the explanations. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does that mean that all our LDC amendments don't have legal sufficiency review prior to coming to us? MR. KLATZKOW: No, no, no. I've reviewed these. But for private -- for the private ones, I don't go to the private guy and sit down and try to redo their amendment. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So who wrote this? Staff did not write this? I know you guys introduced it, but staff didn't put it into the format that we're seeing here today? So this kind of came through in the dark, we get it presented today and the first time everybody sees it is today. MR. GIBLIN: Well, it was submitted months ago. It's gone Page 14 ''''''i A. '4 November 28, 2007 161 through the DSAC twice. lt has been in staffs hands for quite awhile. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I certainly understand Mr. Klatzkow's dilemma. Ifhe can't make sense of it, it's going to be hard for anybody to make legal sense of it. MR. GIBLIN: Maybe I can try to simplify it. The first three pages are the definition. If we've already taken the definition off the table and said just refer to the local Housing Assistance Plan, then I don't see any reason to include that anymore. Really, the core of this change is the -- one, two, three, four -- six lines added under the table on Page 6. That is the core of what we're asking for, and it is to allow major employers in town to provide housing for their employees using the density bonus chart. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And the difference here is by using the chart you can apply it to rentals so you can have more density in your apartment complexes, for example, so when you have a multi-family complex, of which we're used to seeing 10, 12 units per acre, you could have a density bonus that would get you to whatever levels you can get to based on your mix on this table. MR. GIBLIN: Correct. Correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer? I didn't mean to sidetrack everybody from your question. Go right ahead. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: No, that's fine, I'm enjoying the conversation. Cormac, two things. And one thing is the concept of discrimination. So this is good discrimination. And what we're going to do -- I mean, the people that are outside this, is it open to them? I have a software company, can I take advantage ofthis? lt looks like no, but what if I wrote construction-oriented software, would I then be able to? Would an architectural -- MR. GIBLIN: That would be up for the county to interpret the definition. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But you see my point is there's a Page 15 ""'6'" ~ 4 ",. r .', JL ' ;, .. November 28, 2007 line somewhere. That line is a form of discrimination and that can be abused. Second thing, growing up in the northeastern part of Pennsylvania, the company town with the coal mines, is this going to create company condos, which could be an abusive environment for the employees? Is that what the intent is here? MR. GIBLIN: No, I think the intent is here, as Mr. Murray alluded to earlier, is to allow a coalition of different major employers in town to come together, provide a safe, decent, affordable housing option for their employees. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But the problem is the rental, that means that they own the unit the person lives in, therefore, their job controls their ability to live in that unit. So why can't we write something that really lets them bring people to town, let them buy a unit, and then from that point on it's free market. I mean, the concern I have is that becomes a control device. Their history has shown where that's not a good handle on -- MR. GIBLIN: It was really our decision to limit this to only that ESP category, because -- rather than open it up to any employer. But I think maybe to address some of your concerns, maybe that is the angle to take on this, is just to allow rentals at the gap in workforce level to meet that market demand. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right. And the other thing is that these condos will be then totally filled by people who work in that particular business, especially if it's a single employer owned. I mean, is that the healthiest environment, versus mixing the rest of the community together? MR. GIBLIN: It would depend on what other options are out there for the residents. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The intent of providing housing is excellent. I think what the state is trying to do is probably good. But the concern I have is the rental part. I mean, if you brought somebody Page 16 If)' f -A' 1 "".~, ,f,,,, November 28, 2007 to town, you sold them a unit, that's a good idea. The fact that you're discriminating from other people using the unit could be dangerous too. lt is -- can be the slippery slope. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, the more I look at this, I like it. You know, we've always been sort of brought up with the idea that if you own your own home it's better because you're going to take better care of it. That's, I think, a lot of the basis behind Habitat and, you know, the push to try to get people to own their own home. But in the current environment, just the way things are, owner-occupied is really impossible for so many people. People can't afford to get a down payment and to go through -- to get that huge of a loan in order to afford a house, you know, working people in the county. And I think a lot of people would be able to get into a rental thing where they couldn't necessarily afford to buy a house. So I think that -- you know, no one is forcing the people to rent there, but I think it could open up housing in a way that, you know, the programs that we have now that are all focused on ownership can't. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray, then Mr. Vigliotti. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Let me try one more shot at that. If I understand you correctly, the intent of employer-owned was to allow for rentals. If the Sheriff cannot own property, that means none of the deputies can rent unless they rent someplace else at a disadvantaged rate, potentially. This is intended to cure a disadvantaged rate because of their salary. Whether we agree with that or not is unimportant. I think that premise is valid. So my question is, are we not unintentionally creating a problem? Are you representing CWHIPP in any case here? Are you representing the coalition? MR. GIBLIN : No, sir. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: You've been asked by staff to do Page 17 i:1f1 1'/ . r'\ . '. A 4 November 28, 2007 something? MR. GIBLIN: No, I'm representing a private petitioner that's not affiliated with the CWHIPP. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: The impact on this whole coalition could be serious. I'm concerned. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Who are you representing? MR. GIBLIN: It is Vernon Ray. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Okay. I have to go along with Brad. I don't like the idea of rentals. I think what people really want is a chance to buy and own, the pride of ownership. And if you can get people into a house, because we do have programs -- if you can get people into a house, as the house escalates, they're in the market. If people rent, they'll never get out of that rental cycle. And I'm really concerned with seeing a development of 2,000 houses, okay, called, you know, the hospital complex. MR. GIBLIN: I think what Mr. Midney's check hit on a minute ago was a valid point also, though. Not everyone is ready for home ownership at the same time. Some people may just be moving to the community. You know, this community has a need for rental housing as well as owner-occupied housing. And the current county programs, as evidenced by this very change that we're asking for, are all geared to provide only that one type of owner-occupied housing. There's housing needs across the entire spectrum in this county, and I don't think anybody is envisioning a company town or trapped employment or anything like that. I'm sure that these employers, if they would take advantage of this, they would say rent here at a discounted rate thanks to the density bonus for a period of a year, two years, three years, whatever it takes. But by the very means that we're providing this to you at a discount, you will be on your way to home ownership sooner, because you're Page 18 161A4tt November 28, 2007 not being forced to pay 50 percent of your income in rent. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I understand what you're saying, but there's got to be a way to limit it. Once we open the door, I can envision large apartment complexes. If there was a way to limit it by percentage, so many allowed to be purchased, so many allowed as rentals, I'd like it a lot better. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Mr. Adelstein, Ms. Caron, and then Mr. Schiffer. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I understand, for example, let's take that hospital idea. They're now able to build the homes and get it straightened out. And the idea for them is so they can rent them. And when they're renting them:, these people know they have to work there in order to live there. Now, coming up with this affordable housing situation was not an idea of rental, it was an idea of a person who can eventually own a home. In this situation, if I don't like the way you work for my hospital I'm going to say you either do this or you won't work here anymore, or you can work here but I'm going to have to put you out of your house, because you're renting it. This was not the beginning or anywhere I ever read until now. We're talking about affordable housing to be bought by people who are far less financially helped than people who go work for the hospital, and yet we're still being able to put houses in their ownership and still getting along with doing it. I haven't seen very many of them who had to foreclose it. I haven't found any of them yet in the newspaper. This idea of rental is not something that's going to say we're going to do nice. The hospital is going to say we're going to make sure we hold on to our people, because they can't stay in our house unless they work in our building. I don't like that at all. MR. GIBLIN: With respect, I think maybe that the employers may look at it from the opposite perspective, that providing the Page 19 1"6 I A }, November 28, 2007 housing will enable them to attract the highest quality and best employees, and that they see it as providing an additional service to their employees. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I think you're thinking it in your way from your respect, but mostly people who want to do this want to own a home if they possibly can. Almost everybody does want to. In this situation, one of the major people in our whole county here, the hospitals, are going to be able to say you're going to be able to rent here, but you aren't going to be able to buy here. And that's not the way these -- this will force the people to do what they have to do to live there. That's not what this is supposed to be. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Wouldn't they have the opportunity to rent somewhere, and then when they get done, and saving enough money, they can go buy somewhere else? MR. GIBLIN: That I think is the premise here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron, Mr. Schiffer, then Mr. Midney. COMMISSIONER CARON: The one issue that did come out was you began to list criteria that might be involved in this, like, for example, people only rent for a year or two and then can move along. And I don't see any criteria here, and this is the Land Development Code, and there should be criteria, I would think, involved. This is the place for it. And it would seem to me that we would establish criteria for this. MR. GIBLIN: I agree that there needs to be some type of governing criteria. I'm not sure the LDC is the place for it. I think that that might be something for the private sector to work out. If you are offering terms that are unattractive to your employees then they're not going to rent there. If they are attractive, then they are going to rent it. I don't know if that needs to be set hard and fast in the LOC. Page 20 161 m n L 't ; ~//n" November 28, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer, Mr. Midney, and then I'm going to take a few minutes to comment if I could, since everybody else has had one or two times. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Mark, you go ahead. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, go ahead, after you, and then Mr. Midney. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Let me give an example of a concern I have. I had a client, he had multiple operations around the state, and as we'd fly around he would brag that one of his secrets to success was that he would buy the manager their house, essentially they would live in his house. And once the garage got full of junk, he had them, because he could control them, because if they ever, you know, acted out, he could throw them out ofthe house. So that's kind of my concern. And also, I think congregating the same group of people in one apartment building. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, it sounds as though some of the objections is that this somehow is discouraging home ownership. And nothing in this is against ownership, this is just an alternative for people who can't own. And when you look at the credit market right now, there's a lot of people who are going to be having a hard time owning something but could afford to rent. And the other thing is I don't think that you have to say that the hospital or whatever has to allow the people to only stay in the rental housing for a certain number of years and then kick them out. If the person likes it there and is working, I don't think that you should force that there be sort of a time limit on this. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney, you hit on a point that I wanted to make, and that is that the credit market is tightening up. And from all -- and I just got done reading some articles this morning Page 21 ^ t. 1 ~r Vi .t+ ,.:; November 28, 2007 before I came here. It's going to get worse in '08 and '09. Rentals are going to be a necessity. There is nothing wrong with a rental. In fact, the only way you save money up for a home, unless you inherit, is to rent somewhere while you put your money away and save it up. The problem with this proposal is it seems to want to define rentals to a selective group of people, and I'm not sure we need to do that. I think instead we might want to consider scrapping this whole way you're presenting here today, add an additional table that works out bonuses for the rental market. And if an employer or whoever wants to involve themselves with affordable rentals, they go to that table. Now, how they rent them out, whether it's to their employees or to the general public, they can do that through private deed restrictions, and then they can take the liability for any kind of discrimination issues that may come out of that. We don't need to. We simply are providing the opportunity to allow rentals with some bonuses. I'm not sure what they'd be. I'm not sure if the BCC and this board or others would recommend that the bonuses be the same as ownership homes, because ownership homes are a priority here. So maybe we work out a double table, one for ownership and one for rentals, and everything goes away, all the definitions apply and we're all set to go, just like we are. That's a suggestion. Ms. Fabacher? MS. F ABACHER: Fabacher. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Your last name sometimes is like Nick's, but it's not quite so bad. MS. F ABACHER: Thank you. I just wanted to correct what might have been a misimpression. Staff does review the private amendments that come in. This has been reviewed by the zoning department. I spoke with the staff at the housing department. Page 22 161 A 4 November 28, 2007 Now, perhaps it would have been better to have given you a written recommendation, but once we discussed it, they didn't have any problem with it. It's distributed to all of the directors of all the departments and -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You know, Catherine, what I think there's maybe be some disconnect is, all these laws and words we put in place seem fine. They seem fine to us, the EAC, the DSAC, the BCC even. But what it boils down to, what is fine in regards to the attorneys that analyze it when they come before us six months, a year or five years down the road, and then we end up in court battles. So from my perspective, more important than your review is the county attorney's. And then he tells us he can't even understand -- he doesn't even understand what this means, that raises a flag for me, why are we even here when we can't even get a sufficient legal revIew. And if Jeff had a problem with this before it got here, by God, it should have been addressed before it got here. So that's where I was coming from. We have got to be able to do things that are defendable legally in this county. And the only way we do that is with legal review ahead of time. So I wasn't saying staff internally didn't do it. I just want to make sure legal review is done thoroughly before it comes to us. MS. F ABACHER: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I just wanted to offer maybe the option that perhaps we could defer it to our next meeting. In the meantime I could get a recommendation from our housing department. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think -- based on what I'm hearing today, I definitely think this is going to be deferred to our next meeting. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I won't vote for it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer, before you say it again, Mr. Murray did have his hand up before you, and then we'll go back to Page 23 l' {- .>; L \.' '. .'"'~"".'" November 281, 2007 you. Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I don't want to keep on kicking the goose here, but I want to straighten some details out. What I do know, and I don't pretend to know everything that's going on, but I have some affiliation with this group. Let me make something clear, because I am a member of the board of the hospitals, and I will tell you that they are not in the business of owning homes. They are concerned, at least I know at HMA's homes, the Physician's Regional, they were interested in a right of first refusal that they could have an opportunity for their employees. They're not concerned with that. I recognize there may be some Simon Legrees out there, but I know that NCH historically has -- when they bring in their nurses, they put them up, they put them up in rental quarters. And they'd love to be able to facilitate that a little easier than what they do now. They're not interested, it's not their central work. They're interested in trying to make available clean, adequate housing for, say, a young nurse who can't afford a 1,500 square foot apartment, could afford a 700 square foot, maybe, if there was another nurse. That type of arrangement, that saves them money, they can get an opportunity to either choose to leave or they could buy a home. Focusing exclusively on home purchasing is short-sighted on this part, so I recognize the desirability of doing this. But again, I'll state again clearly that I think the coalition needs to represent -- to be here to talk about this issue, and I would ask them to do that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Cormac, why is it important that you put in employer-owned all the time? In other words, why couldn't a private developer take advantage of this, build a rental thing with the intent to rent to essential services? MR. GIBLIN: That was our decision to limit it and just to this Page 24 1 6 t N~ve~~er 28, 2007 category of employers, rather than open it up to the general public, because of previous direction by the Board of County Commissioners that rentals maybe were not such a good idea. But I really like Mr. Strain's idea that we should open it up to -- my feeling is that we should open it up to anyone and everyone who wants to build affordable housing, be it rental or ownership, and not get into this restrictions on who your employer is. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right. And I think the concept of employer-owned, obviously I've expressed a concern. Imagine the construction company building an apartment building with a bus that picks up all the workers every -- I mean, look where that could go. And the civil rights laws have spent a long time weeding out what that could start to bring back in. The second thing is when you do rent this thing, you pay somebody a salary, how does the value of this rental apply to his salary? Is it a benefit, is it cheap rent, is it market rent? MR. GIBLIN: Well, it would be cheap rents. The rent would be controlled by the percentage of median income that the units are set aside for, just like the current system. So it would be a reduced rate from market rate. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Essentially wouldn't that add to a salary then, the reduction from market rate? And thus could that throw him out of the program? But anyway, that's a bookkeeping thing. I think the concern is that if you went through here and scrapped the word employer-owned everywhere you put it, I would be a lot more comfortable with this. Because if a private developer did it then, you know, the Sheriff could live next to the nurse, who could live next to the construction worker, which to me is healthier. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Brad, if you scrapped the word employer-owned, basically then what you've got is the same definition practically as gap. So why add another definition just to scrap the Page 25 16' ...,~,j '''lJ.~I;' .'''''lr';~ November 28, 2007 word employer-owned? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Because it gives you a little bit bigger benefits than gap, doesn't it? I mean, that's why you're -- otherwise why do this? MR. GIBLIN: Again, to underline what Mr. Strain said a moment ago, perhaps the easiest solution here is, the first star under the chart on Page 6, strike through that entire line, giving the entire chart to rental, owner-occupied, public, private. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Now, I didn't say, though -- what I'm concerned about is we are trying to encourage home ownership. We're not trying to encourage rentals in this county. But I think that rentals are going to be a necessity with the marketplace and the credit crunch coming ahead of us in the next two years. And out of fairness, we ought to supply rentals. Therefore, I'm not sure we want to provide the same incentive for rentals that we do for home occupancy, because if we're trying to promote more home occupancy, the incentive rate should be higher, and the rental incentive rates might be changed. So that's why I was suggesting a different table. And that is something that BCC direction certainly would be where they would decide where to go. But I know from listening to the meetings that they prefer home ownership. And I'm sure that there will be weighted tables in that regard if this were to happen that way. Mr. Klatzkow, is there anything you wanted to add to this? MR. KLATZKOW: The difference between when staff presents something and when the private sector presents something is I can sit down with staff and I can say what is it that you're really trying to get at here. And when the private petitioner comes in, he has a project in mind. I don't know what that project is, and he's trying to change the LDC to get that project, and then we're trying to guess at what that Page 26 It ' A 4 November 28, 2007 project is and what the ramifications are. And I've still listened to this and I still don't know what he's trying to get at here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think we're in agreement with you. MR. KLATZKOW: Perhaps if you could explain what the project this client wants placed in, we could then more intelligently deal with this amendment. MR. GIBLIN: This change would be used in a --let's say in a PUD setting, someone building multi-family condominium buildings and would like the opportunity to sell maybe a block of six or 10 or 12 to the hospital, blocks of 10 to the fire department, a block of 10 to the county to provide affordable rental housing to their employees. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: They're doing that now. MR. KLATZKOW: So this is what Ave Maria is trying to do. MR. GIBLIN: They cannot do that with the density bonus the way it's currently written. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: If you go down to Manatee Road and 951, there's a project behind the Coral Isle Mall called Rookery. They're renting out to the hotels on Marco, they're renting out to different employers blocks of building at a time, and then the employers put people in there. MR. GIBLIN: And you can do that -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, so-- MR. GIBLIN: -- but you cannot use a density bonus to make it even more affordable. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm not sure that they're not using it, but either way I understand what you're saying there. I don't think this is going to fly here today. Mr. Vigliotti? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: What is our procedure from here? Are we going to rewrite this or do we get to vote yes or no, and he goes back and tries and tries and rewrites it? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's where I was just headed, but I Page 27 161 !~ November 28, 2007 wanted to give you the opportunity, because I thought you were going to -- if you have another question? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: No -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh, okay. Well, then if-- COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: -- I want to wrap it up. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- all our questions are finished here today, I think the direction of this board is it's not going to work and you might want to come back with something better on our next time around, because that's the only next chance we're going to have before it's got to go either forward or not. MR. GIBLIN: I will see you on the 12th at 5:05 and I'll have something to Catherine by the end of this week. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Keep an eye on the timing of the meeting and communicate with Catherine, because if we don't get through a lot today, I'm going to request staffto squeeze in more nights and afternoons between now and the 21st of December, because there's no reason we can't finish this cycle in December. And we will finish it in December. So there may be another date squeezed in there, too. MR. GIBLIN: Great. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, sir. Okay, before we do the video, Joe, I'd like to finish the public participation here. I'd like to go into the sign ordinance with Ms. Krier as the next one. MS. F ABACHER: All right. Our next one will be on Page 43, and that's going to be the -- actually open house signs. We're going to go ahead and perhaps take the speakers first. I think Mr. Poteet asked to speak first. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MS. FABACHER: Page 43. Page D on your summary sheet. Mr. Poteet. MR. POTEET: Thank you. For the record, my name is William Page 28 '1 J, M 4 November 28,2007 H. Poteet, Jr. I represent the Naples Area Board of Realtors, and we're here to discuss open house signs. And the reason the need's there is prior to the original adoption of the Land Development Code everybody had open house signs in town, and everybody was doing business and everything was fine. But subsequently, once the LDC was adopted, the staff over at code enforcement determined that it was not included in the code and therefore it was illegal. So now we have illegal open house signs all throughout Collier County. Not in the City of Naples, but just in Collier County. So what we decided to do is I called up Michelle Arnold and asked to meet with her to see if we could come up with some type of resolution to correct this, because the realtors are really just trying to serve their clients. We have over 12,000 clients out there right now that want to sell their properties, and one of the best vehicles that we know is the tried and true open house. So in order to get people to the open house, they have to be able to know it's open. And you need a sign in front of the building and possibly a directional sign to show you where it is, because some of the listings are at the end of streets that are almost a mile long. So we met with -- we called Michelle up, we set up a meeting with Mr. Schmitt and Michelle, and Michelle could not attend but she sent Dave Scribner from code enforcement. And we had a very, very productive meeting. We told them our concerns, they told their concerns, and what you see today is a partial draft of what we discussed. The only thing that is missing on that particular draft is we talked about the directional sign. And we're not trying to be sign crazy, because we understand one of the complaints that was out there in the community is I see signs everywhere. We wanted to have open houses signs just during open house periods. We wanted to make sure that we Page 29 A 4 November 28, 2007 limited the hours of the open houses, so you don't go by at 7:00 in the evening and see the sign still out there in the street. If they're going to have an open house sign, they put it up between 10:00 and 5:00 and have their open house and then go away after that. The directional sign, it was also discussed, but was not in the draft here, unfortunately. And I've had discussions with Mr. Schmitt about it, and he and I have been e-mailing back and forth some suggestions on how to do that. And ifhe would like to tell you what we've talked about, that would be great. MR. SCHMITT: For the record, Joe Schmitt. Bill is in fact correct. We talked about this. And one of the problems also is code enforcement. We on some weekends pick up maybe 100 to 150 of these what we call snipe signs, some of which are for sale signs, open house signs. And it is somewhat a disservice, I guess, if you want to look at it, to the person trying to sell the home, because they put these signs out there. Our code mandates that we pick them up. I think the code was probably a bit too restrictive. The concern here is where do you want these signs. But the other issue is, for instance, the -- let's say a home is for sale in the Estates where you kind of want to lead somebody to the right street down a direction, but how many directional -- we'll call them directional signs, even though that is a term specifically dealing with our sign terminology, so we may have to call it something different. But auxiliary open house signs or whatever we call it. But what would be appropriate to put these out, at the comer of the major thoroughfare. We do not want these in the median, that was made clear. What this does allow is for them to be 10 feet from the edge of pavement, so the restriction now currently says they cannot be in the right-of-way at all. The other issue here was we wanted to make sure there was a time limit and we wanted to make sure there was also identification on Page 30 161 :j 4 ':1 I"a November 28c, 2007 the sign, who put that sign out so we can make sure if they're -- we pick them up beyond the time limits or they're there and they're left there, we can certainly deal with it through a neighbor. But the intent here between Bill and Ellie and I and Michelle and Dave Scribner was trying to sort out the balance between making sure we do not stifle the opportunity or the attempt of people trying to sell real estate but at the same time make sure we don't have sign proliferation. So I guess maybe we're looking for your guidance on this as well as have any suggestions dealing with how many signs do you think would be appropriate. It's hard to describe how we would do that. A thousand feet, no more than 1,000 feet near the existing sign or in front of the open house, that property that's conducting the open house. But then how many more signs do we allow, for instance in the Estate, all the way up to the Golden Gate Boulevard? I don't know. You guys -- looking for your guidance on this. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I have a suggestion. I think they're necessary, for one. But if you put an address on them and you allotted each open house to have two or three, with that address, code enforcement could keep track of it, because each sign would have an address. And if you had 20 for one address that would be overkill, but if you had just two or three, that would be a starting point with an address to track. MR. SCHMITT: And that was my suggestion, no more than 1,000 feet apart, no more than, I believe, three, two to three? MR. POTEET: You didn't put a number. Our original discussion was we wanted one directional sign and be able to put it at the end of the street so we can get them down the street to the house. Where we run into problems occasionally is if we have more than one open house going on in the street, and so you'll have a person halfway down the street has his open house, and the guy at the other end of the street, nobody goes to it because they thought they already Page 31 1 ~.'.~ A 4 ,,>' ',../ November 28, 2007 got there. So we were going to allow one open house sign per open house, so they could put another one of them down the street. But he had suggested no closer than 1,000 feet from the actual house. But then you run into problems if the house is only three or four houses in on the block, people that are driving on the cross street are not going to see the open house sign because they're too far into the street. So you still need the directional sign at the beginning of the street. That's where we really want to make sure that at the beginning of the street that the open house is on that we have the ability to have a sign. And this does not preclude those gated communities, they'll have separate for themselves. This is just in the Golden Gate proper -- or not Golden Gate proper but the county. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: But Bill -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: -- unless there's an address on each sign, there's no way to keep track of it. If at the end of a park you had two oftherm, one for each address, okay, you'd bring people down there, and they'd know if they went to each one, and then one at the house -- MR. POTEET: That could be done. I mean, what we've acquired CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You guys, before you go too far, you've both got to wait till the other one completely finishes talking, because every word you say has to be recorded, and she can't take two at the same time. So let him finish before you start, then you start. And we'll go back and forth like that. MR. POTEET: I understand. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Again, as a beginning point, without an address on each sign there's no way to keep track of them for code enforcement. And if you allow two or three maximum, then Joe could work the space limitations out from you, I feel more Page 32 16,A 4 November 28, 2007 comfortable with it. MR. POTEET: Now, on the address, you just want the address for information for code enforcement, is that the purpose? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: No, the address for the people driving down the street. In other words, open house, 125 Jones Lane, on the particular sign. So now when they see an open house sign there's an address tied to it and they'll go looking for that. If there's a sign next to it saying open house, 425 Smith Street down the same road, they'll know to go to Smith street or Jones Lane. lt would be an advantage for you because it will help solve that poor guy down at the end of the block that never got visited. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Morning, Mr. Poteet. MR. POTEET: Good morning, Mr. Murray. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: How do we feel about multiple signs at the comer of Jones Lane and directing people to seven homes that are up for sale? How do we feel about that, the proliferation of that? Well, that wouldn't be a proliferation, just their being there. That's a problem, too, isn't it? You would recognize that as an issue. MR. POTEET: It could be a problem. There would be times that you would have multiple open houses on the street, yes. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Because I live in a condominium and there are multiple homes for sale and multiple open houses. I don't object to it personally, because people should try to be able to sell their property ifthey want. But it does -- I've also passed places in the Estates where I've looked and I've said oh, my, there's six signs, there's six signs suggesting that there are people selling homes on that street. I think that hurts the character of the neighborhood to some degree. So I don't know if that impacts on it. MR. POTEET: The reason we went to code enforcement and through community development is to come up with a plan that the community may accept in order to resolve a problem that's out there Page 33 ~ ."""i t" I . ~ -.J\.. ' ~1 V\li November 28, 2007 already, because people are violating the rules as it is right now. We want to cure it. We want to be able to go back to our folks and tell them these are the rules. Now these will also apply to the FSBO's. They will have the same responsibilities and the same opportunities that's out there. Because currently what they're doing is illegal also. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I wonder if a single sign, for instance, a sign that directs people down Jones Lane that might say open house today with a little tab that could be used to get an S in there, open houses, or however it might be done, that would be a single sign as a directional sign. And the specific signs at the property might be useful. Does that have any credence, any credibility? MR. POTEET: I could see us saying that we could have one open house sign at the beginning of a street -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: That makes sense to me -- MR. GIBLIN: -- and whichever realtor gets there first puts up the sign, and that's fine. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I have a question of staff. Is this a private-driven LDC amendment? MS. F ABACHER: No, this came from community development. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So Mr. Poteet is speaking as a member of the public? MS. F ABACHER: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And so are the other people, Ms. Krier and -- okay, so this wasn't private like Cormac. MS. F ABACHER: Right. Correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Cormac initiated a broad request for an LDC amendment as a private sector individual. How does that differ from what I'm hearing here now? This is being done for a private sector as well. How is it any different then what Cormac came before us? Page 34 L A 4 November 28, 2007 The reason I'm asking is we're directing all our interaction between the citizens' comments and we should be directing them to staff for analysis. And I'm just wondering where the fine line is. Mr. Adelstein, I'll get to you in just a minute. MR. SCHMITT: The fine line, Cormac's dealing with a specific issue dealing with a specific client to amend the code for a particular situation that he wanted to solve. When I -- we've been talking -- I've been talking to NABR about this probably for over a year, different times, about the problems. lt's a problem for code. And from a community development perspective, when NABR asked to meet again with staff, it is a mutually -- it solves mutual problems, for them as well as us. To me it alleviates some of the resources that I have to devote on weekends to go out and pick up signs. So that's the fine line. lt's an amendment that we proceeded with because it does give me some -- it basically relaxes some of the restrictions that are in place, and then it gives me the opportunity to use my resources elsewhere. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I was just trying to make sure that when we get down to this, the direction we have to respond to basically is staff and how they're putting this together and they're going to interpret it. And the public input is needed more so that we go in the right direction. MR. SCHMITT: That's correct. lt's a staff-initiated, mainly because of the resource issues, and frankly, from that standpoint that's -- I'm looking at it strictly as I can use resources elsewhere, especially on weekends, when I'm looking at code enforcement, rather than go out and picking up 100 signs. I can pick up 100 snipe signs and not worry about the open house signs. I mean that's, frankly, that's the Issue. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What's a snipe sign? Page 35 I 6 I ..~ ({ij~ November 28, 2007 MR. SCHMITT: lt's a nickname for these little signs they pull on the road, you know, call me if you're going to get foreclosed, or cars for sale, or -- isn't that what we call them, Michelle? They're snipe signs, they're just -- MR. KLATZKOW: Signs put on other peoples' property. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I've never head of that before. MR. SCHMITT: You see them on the road, carpets for sale, open house, garage sale. We probably pick up a hundred of them a weekend or more. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein, would you ask your question please. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Yes, I'm talking about Palm Drive, which is the first street up this way. Up now we have almost all the realtors going up to one end and stating which ones are open, and at the back end, the same thing. And then on the additional spot, the same thing. This goes on from approximately II :00 in the morning and then till about 3:00,4:00 in the afternoon. But at the front of the place, you see where they are and you can write it down. Coming out the other way you can do exactly the same thing. Now they can go into this home with usually a realtor involved, and that way it doesn't seem to bother any of the other people that are living there. It's a very simple thing, usually on Sundays. And by 5:00, 5:30, they're gone, the signs and all. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah, I actually was just going to talk about the actual language here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'd like to get past the public speakers so we can get to the staff who wrote the language, and then we can go from there. Any other questions of Mr. Poteet? MS. KRIER: Good morning, Ellie Krier for the record, Page 36 '1 I' [; ill " I. t, J, f}n ",c .,,) jJJvem'lir 28, 2007 representing the Naples Area Board of Realtors. Just two things. If you look on your Page 44 and 45, you'll see on 44, on items 2.A and 2.B, the final paragraph, in parens, no building permit required. I would ask that that be added to whatever your final language is. I'm sure that was the intent, but I think that needs to be in there. And I would like to address briefly Mr. Strain's comments. Unlike the prior petitioner, we're here to solve a problem for Collier County residents. Yes, they're our clients, but there's no unknown project lurking behind us, it's people trying to sell their homes. And with regard to multiple signs at the end of the street, which Mr. Adelstein referred to, as well as Mr. Murray, if a realtor or that street chooses to have six open houses on one day, it may indeed hurt them, but that's what the free market allows them to do. It's a public information that we're trying to convey. They can choose whether they want to be one of seven or wait till the next Sunday and show it themselves in isolation. I don't think that that's the county's need to get into what should be a free market situation there. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I'd just like to ask Ms. Krier a question. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sure, go ahead, Mr. Murray. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I think you misunderstood me, anyway. I was referring to places like the Estates where you're driving and there then would be, say, six or seven signs at a street where the homes are way down. I have no objection to home after home after home having their own sign. I thought that it would be not beneficial to a community to have all of these signs on a single thing. lt draws a negative attention. Recognizing that yes, it is a free market issue, I have no problem beyond that. MS. KRIER: Finally, in answer to Mr. Schmitt's question about Page 37 16 I A 4 November 28, 2007 the word directional, you could always use off-site open house sign as language that would adequately describe what they are. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Okay, back to the language of the document. We have it several pages, starting on Page 43. Does anybody on the planning commission have comments or questions about the actual language, now that we've heard the discussion from the public? Ms. Caron, then Mr. Schiffer. COMMISSIONER CARON: I have a question about the term erected. I believe that the signs that we're talking about are these signs that you just stick in the ground. They're like -- they're essentially cardboard signs with little metal posts to get them into the ground. I don't think that they require construction, which seems to be the term here. And I just want to make sure that I am correct, and perhaps we can change that word to may be placed. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, actually, if you look in D and others, you've got a good point. They use the words located. COMMISSIONER CARON: Or located, sure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Another word would probably be better there, certainly. So I'm sure staff can come up with a word for that. Is that okay, Catherine? MS. F ABACHER: Yes, it's fine. Located is good, installed. I agree if the other text says located, that would be good. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anything else, Mr. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: That's fine for now. I think we've made a couple of other comments that will come back. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And my suggestion is I think obviously the two-by-two sign is good at the location. I like Bob Vigliotti's idea of actually putting the address. Page 38 16 I' n , .. .. /J r ~ I .1'Jov~ber 28, 2007 So maybe what we'll do -- I would suggest that we add another sign, I think, calling it an off-site address sign where you allow an additional two square feet, which essentially is one-foot by two-foot where you do put the address. And then that way the realtors can have their normal two-by-two and then have something that's adjustable with the address that they could stick on the top or bottom. Ifwe allow just one of those at their prime intersection with the address, then not have a whole series of arrow signs leading down, I think that would be good. I think the size is important to the people that are going to be in vehicles reading it, you don't want people stopping on right-of-ways to take addresses off. So again, one sign at the premise, the two-by-two, and then an additional one-by -- well, I'll make it two square feet, that would have the address to be attached to it off-site. And I guess we can call that the off-site address sign, and that would do it. Second thing, Joe, I wish you were in my Boy Scout troop with this snipe hunt. We would have a lot of fun with you. But unfortunately you would come back with something and spoil the whole thing, so. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any other comments on the language? Mr. Vigliotti. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: On Page 44, number 2.A, one ground sign with a maximum height of six feet? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: This is existing language. The only language for discussion today is the language that's underlined. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Under G, during supervised real estate open houses. I'm just wondering why we need supervised in there. If I were an owner, I would think I would be there. If! were an Page 39 16/ /~1 , ;j q November 28, 2007 agent representing an owner, I would be there. That's the supervised, I would assume. Is there anything other than supervised real estate open houses? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Catherine, you were just asked a question. MS. FABACHER: I'm sorry, excuse me. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Are there any other -- is there any other thing than a supervised real estate open house? MS. FABACHER: I would think if you leave a lock box and some brochures, you could put an open house sign, people could wander in and look around themselves. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm not sure you'd want that. I think if you leave the words -- MS. F ABACHER: I think that's what supervised means, is that there's staff available to show the house. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yes, I understand that. But you're requiring it as supervised. Suppose somebody -- it says during supervised. So you're just suggesting that ifthere were no supervision, what? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: lt couldn't have a model (sic) home sign MS. F ABACHER: You couldn't have this sign. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: You can't have a sign. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Why would they need one ifnobody could get in to see the house? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I agree, I would never want anybody going in without -- I don't know if it was superfluous language, that's all. I'm glad you qualified it. MS. FABACHER: Excuse me. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes, ma'am. MS. F ABACHER: Mrs. Arnold just pointed out that the sign that we've allowed with the existing language is technically also off-site, Page 40 It A 4 November 28, 2007 even though it's in the right-of-way adjacent to the parcel. It's still not on the property. lt's in our right-of-way, 10 feet from the pavement. So just not to be confusing, because this would be a second off-site. When you say one off-site sign, she's correct in saying that the sign that's going to be at the property is actually off-site because it's in the right-of-way and not on the property. And so then you may just -- work with the words on that, that's all she'd like me to point out. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'd been wanting to get to two points. Number one is how many model (sic) signs are we proposing per lot? MS. F ABACHER: Open house. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: How many open house signs are we proposing per open house? MS. FABACHER: We're proposing, as I understand now, we're proposing the one that's going to be adjacent and abutting the lot, and then there's going to be the one we call the off-site address sign. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The one that's adjacent, abutting the lot, how are we limiting it to one? Is there somewhere in here that says one? I might have missed that. MS. FABACHER: lt says an. We can change an open house to one open house sign. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I would think so. Because in the following sentence you refer to plurality of signs. And I would -- I wouldn't want anybody to mix up and come out there with 20 signs just to cause attention to the open house. MS. F ABACHER: Thank you for pointing that out. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Brad, before I get finished, did you want to say -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: No, that's fine, go ahead. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The directional sign that's been talked about, off-site and all that. We're back to where off-site means. And I understand it's in an intersection near streets that are leading to -- with an address on it. Page 41 1< 6 I '~'hi ~~ d~~ '..: M If" ~ 1,.... Novem er 28,2007 But we don't want them in the medium, we don't want them hanging from the light pole. And if they're off-site and they're not in someone else's front yard and they're at an intersection, where are they going to be? MS. F ABACHER: In the right-of-way. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I know, but the right-of-way abuts someone's front yard. So if I happen to have a comer house on an intersection, I can expect to wake up in the morning when I'm trying to cut my lawn and stuff and see 20 real estate signs stacked up out there with directions to my model home -- or to an open house down the street? Is that what we're trying to say is okay? MS. FABACHER: No, I don't believe so. I think Ms. Krier suggested that first come, first serve. And that we maybe write something and say that no two can be within 1,000 feet, you know, have a distance restriction or something like that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That still doesn't address my question. I'm still trying to find out, comer property owners have just as much right to their piece of the earth as the rest of us do. Just because they live on a comer, they shouldn't be inundated with signage placed in their front yards, whether that front yard is part of the right-of-way or not. My front yard or everybody's front yard is part of some right-of-way. And you treat it like -- you trim it, you put landscaping there, you take care of it. It would be hard to give someone a right just to walk up and stick a sign in the middle of your lawn or landscape bed and say there's an open house down the street. So I'm not saying I'm against it, I'm trying to figure out how we regulate the placement of it so we don't intrude on someone else's privacy that we shouldn't be doing. That's just those two comments are what I had. I think if we limit it to one on-site -- or, say, off-site, but a contiguous to sign, as we've Page 42 16' J ~ l" Ii ":,c,' , "',/- November 28, 2007 done with this language. And by the way, I think the point was well made, no building permit required. lt should be added to the end like it is on the others. And then if we study further this idea of where this directional sign should go so it's not intruding on someone's privacy, I think that would be the second way to take a look at it, so. Mr. Adelstein. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: The idea that I have watched on this situation is basically we have the sidewalk that goes to the curb, and that's where the sign goes, not on their property. In fact, I've watched it now almost every Sunday. And in most situations, that is always on the curb-in side, and the For Rent, whatever -- For Sale is on the wherever they want to do it. But the answer is you always can see it as you drive by because it's there. And it doesn't really offend anybody because it is not their property . CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Unfortunately a lot of the county doesn't have curbs and sidewalks, and where a lot of the real estate is being sold, in Golden Gate Estates, which is the biggest selling part of the county, there are no curbs and sidewalks. So that wouldn't fit that scenario, and that's why I was bringing it up, because all of us out there have -- could have comer lots and the signs would have to be stuck on our lawns. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: You're not going to sell it to them so they so they can get it done? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm not. So anyway, that's why I -- I think it needs to have more thought on where that directional sign will go. Mr. Schiffer. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And this is to Joe, a question. Do you have any complaints on -- from the citizens on this or -- MR. SCHMITT: I'm going to have to turn to Michelle on that, Page 43 '11 t. Ill}, 1 ',,"/, ~oveiitber 28 2007 , because I -- dealing with signs -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Because my point -- MR. SCHMITT: Mostly they are -- the complaints are dealing with them, the signs not being in the right place. So if you want to give a little history on this. MS. ARNOLD: Because we normally -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Michelle Arnold for the record. MS. ARNOLD: I'm sorry, Michelle Arnold for the record. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You should be used to this by now. MS. ARNOLD: I should definitely be used to that. Because we do this on a regular basis in terms of enforcement going out and picking up these signs, we don't get a lot of complaints. I think if we don't do it regularly on the weekends and during the week, we would probably get lots of complaints. So we don't typically get lots of complaints on this particular issue. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So the question is that it -- this isn't being driven by the citizens complaining, this is being driven by the fact that you have been having these snipe hunts and you keep picking these up. MS. ARNOLD: Well, I think it's partially driven by, you know, NABR concerns there, and the market the way it is currently, too. There's been a concern -- there's been discussions with NABR over the years of how do we address open house signs so that it can be sensitive to the citizens as well as that particular industry. And this is our first attempt to try to address the open house signs on properties that are being sold. I think that there is still a concern from NABR's perspective about placement of off-premise open house signs to attract the public to those properties. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The point Mark made, are you concerned about that, that if in fact somebody lives on a popular comer, they could wake up in the morning with a forest of open house signs? Page 44 16 I At 1+ November 28, 2007 MS. ARNOLD: That is a concern. Some of the areas that are prominent for a lot of these open house signs are -- the end of the street would be commercial, for example, Naples Park. So you're dealing with commercial property as opposed to residential. In the Estates, however, you will have that problem where you've got tons of signs located on somebody's residential property. That's part of my concerns of proliferation of signs at one particular comer. And if we could come up with a way to address that so that it's, you know -- we're not having to pick up ten signs. And if they are out there beyond the time period that they're allowed, there's just one sign to pick up, that would be great. Plus it would be something that addresses the industry. I don't know how we do that, because you've got real estate -- various real estate companies, so it's not like all of one particular company is selling the homes that may be on a particular street or in a particular community, so it is a difficult -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think, Michelle, we're at a point today where we don't have the complete language to this, and that's been well documented. But I think direction's been given about our concerns for better language. Some minor tweaking to the language that is here, but I think generally G is somewhat in pretty good shape. But I think what we really need now is to have staff get together with the real estate people and come back with some refined language on the directional sign at our next meeting, and we can get this thing over with and move forward. That might be the most productive way to resolve this. Ms. Murry? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I do have one other thought. Commissioner Caron brought up the issue of erection of a sign, and I recognize that this would be a responsibility of the condominium association, but it could apply anywhere. We had an individual who chose to have installed on the Page 45 16 fA It NoverJ;er 28,2007 common property a four-by-four stick in the ground, deep in the ground, with a post, an extension and a hanging sign that said open house, you know, for sale by owner. And this was intended to be left there. And of course, you know, we compelled him to take it down. But that was in condominium, in common property, which is the responsibility in my view of the association. But you also might have that circumstance arising in other locations where private homes would be for sale. So I think erection or some language that relates to that is important because not every open house is going to be simply that. That's a thought you might take into consideration. MS. ARNOLD: Well, the size criteria currently contained in there would probably alleviate that particular problem, a larger than the current provisions for smaller -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: The sign itself was probably within the signage -- MS. ARNOLD: Oh, it was? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: -- but the post stood up probably six feet, five feet. And so it was clearly visible. It was intended to be there until that person sold that property. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Under this criteria, though, the height would be exceeded then. And the action of re-digging that hole and putting it in the ground, tamping it in and removing it every day, they'd probably wouldn't want to do that -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: They didn't do -- intend to remove, they intended to keep it there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: This regulation would prevent that. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I hope so. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I do want to wrap this up. But Mr. Murray brought up a good idea. At the end of the street, the first sign up could say open house. Now, if you have another realtor Page 46 16' ,I :1- 14 Ii '. November 28,2007 coming in, they would have to either come up with a different sign that says open houses or some kind of different -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: A little tab that reveals S-- COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: -- something, okay. So one sign at the end of the block for an open house. And do a tab, we'll come up with some kind of idea to add an S. So now we have one and then one at each, in front of the houses. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: lt sounds like the -- realtors are going to get along and cooperate in sales like that, like the Palestines (sic) and the Arabs, so good luck in seeing that happen. But anyway, let's just go ahead and leave it with -- as we've stated with staff. They'll come back to the next meeting with some revised language and we'll go from there. And at this point let's take a break until 10:00 and when we get back, we'll resume with the -- whatever kind of cartoon we're going to see. I'm not sure which one now. (A break was taken.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, everybody. Ifwe resume our seats. Yesterday was the Board of County Commissioners meeting in which the representative of Cocohatchee had asked one of the commissioners to discuss the possibility of how we should be looking at this particular issue that's come before us or it's been remanded back to us. That discussion ensued, and I think I watched it -- I was pretty clear on what they said, and I think Mr. Schmitt has got a tape for it for the benefit of everybody here so we can see it again at to providing direction to this board on the 13th Cocohatchee Bert Harris claim Issue. MR. SCHMITT: For the record, Joe Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development and Environmental Services Division. I asked the chairman if! could take five minutes -- I think, no less and no more than about five minutes so the board planning Page 47 ,- ! " .... fG... ""d n , j4'"'" fin I I!{,/f' November 28,2007 commission can hear the guidance of the board. Mr. Strain is in fact correct. lt was brought up yesterday during discussion. In front of me here is resubmittal number seven. I received it on Wednesday and it was distributed to the staff on Monday. And this is in comments back from the applicant on our latest rejection. I'm going to have a meeting on the afternoon of December 7th. The entire staff involved in the review and anybody and everybody involved in regards to the applicant, the public, anybody that wants to come, we are going to review this thing in detail prior to your meeting on the 13th. But let me play the -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Before you go-- MR. SCHMITT: I'll pause. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I was talking for a minute. But you said something about reviewing it in detail and everybody is welcome to come. What were you referring to? MR. SCHMITT: I opened the meetings up. Certainly it's open to the public. Anybody that wants to come and -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Which meeting? MR. SCHMITT: This is -- I'm going to meet -- my staff is meeting with representatives of the petitioner, the applicant for Cocohatchee, their design team, anybody that's been involved in this SDP process to go and review in detail every comment of staff. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But Joe, when? MR. SCHMITT: This is December 7th. I'm reviewing that prior to your meeting. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But then we have a problem. What you just did is invited the planning commission. We can't show up there without an advertisement. So are you going to be advertising the December 7th meeting? MR. SCHMITT: lt is not an advertised meeting. If the planning commission wants to send somebody there as a representative. But it's a meeting that -- I would have to ask the county attorney if you all Page 48 1l A 4 November 28, 2007 come, certainly you wouldn't be able to participate, you just would have to sit and listen, unless one member wanted to be appointed to sit and participate in the review process. But I opened it up to the applicant, I said you can invite anybody you want, because we are going to devote the afternoon to review this plan in detail so you could be prepared -- we can be prepared to discuss this at your December 13th meeting. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But Joe, if you -- ifthe planning commission attends, we have to -- that has to be a public notice meeting if more than one of us attend. The information that's going to be provided at that meeting is going to be relayed to us by staff anyway. MR. SCHMITT: That's correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So all we're going to do is fill the room up, and you would have a room this big if you're inviting the public by announcing it now at this meeting because you're going to have a lot of people from North Naples who possibly want to be there. I, under all conditions, want to avoid any problems with the Sunshine rules in regards to this planning commission and this issue in particular. lt is a litigation issue. And I'm sure that any mistake made will be used in any manner it want's to be used in. And we don't want to make any mistakes by attending that meeting and taking a chance of a Sunshine Law violation. So with that in mind, I'd like to ask this commission, does anybody here intend to attend that meeting? But. (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Because I'd like a confirmation that none of us will, including myself, we will not attend the meeting then, and put any kind of idea forward that could cause us to have a cloud over our 13th meeting. So fine, you have a clean meeting on the 7th without us. We expect that staff will give us a full report, and we'll have our own Page 49 It.: )~ ~J t; n , November 28, 2007 ability to analyze this stuff when it comes to us for the 13th anyway. I think everybody here is good for their word. Everybody says that -- nobody's going to attend, right? Then that's the way it will be. MR. KLATZKOW: Quite frankly, if two of you attend, either one's leaving or the meeting's been canceled, so it's -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think we're going to get a full report anyway. There's no need to get into that minutia at this time, so. I appreciate that. Thank you. And now we'll go forward, Joe. (Video presentation begins.) COMMISSIONER COYLE: -- input from the planning commission on the Cocohatchee settlement. That the agreement that we were negotiating at that point in time. There continues to be a lot of confusion about what it is we want to do, and I'm not at all sure that it's been properly implemented yet. lt has been postponed at least once. And I'd like for us to give some guidance so that we can get this moving along, otherwise it's just going to linger for a lot longer period of time. Basically this is my concern: When I read the settlement, it is difficult for me to determine what the potential impact ofthe settlement will be on our Land Development Code and its interpretations and whether or not we're going to get back into a situation like Cap D'Antibes. So I would like to get the planning commission to take a look at this so they can tell us what those provisions in that agreement are likely to do, both negative and positive. I am not interested in the planning commission telling me whether I should have a settlement or not, that's not the planning commission's job. The settlement issues are legal issues and they are issues to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners. I don't mind if they venture an opinion on it, but that's not my reason for getting it to them. Page 50 ~ 16th , JJj, November 28, 2007 My reason for getting it to them is for them to look at what we are saying in that settlement agreement and advising us whether or not there are disadvantages to the county contained within that agreement. And I'd just like to understand that. So what I'd like to do is to get us to say to the planning commission, look, schedule a workshop so that you can all get together and talk and share your ideas about this in the public. And then after that's happened, have the chairman come here to our meeting where this will be discussed to provide a summary of the consensus of the members of the planning commission. And that way we get the benefit of their input. They can also talk with any of us and all of us independently, and I would encourage them to do that. So basically that's where I was thinking we would go with this. And I just -- I wanted to bring it up because it just seems to be lingering and going on and on and on. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: I like what you're saying, there's only thing that troubles me a little bit is that we do put a lot on the planning commission. I would think that their written opinion would be more acceptable than having to have another person leave work to be able to come in and explain it to us. They might willingly do it, but I'm afraid we're going to get to the point where we're going overburden a voluntary group -- COMMISSIONER COYLE: I understand. As long as we get their input, whether it's in writing or in presentation. I just want -- they're good at their job, they know what they're doing, and they do it more thoroughly than we do it. And I don't want to miss the opportunity to let them review this agreement. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Okay, fellow commissioners, I agree with it. How do you feel? COMMISSIONER HALAS: I was going to chime in, that's why I got my light on. Page 51 'i (' t A ~ J r. - "d ' Novem er 28, 2007 CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Good. Commissioner Henning, I don't know if you came before Commissioner Halas or not, but -- COMMISSIONER HALAS: I was next. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Go ahead. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Okay. Since this is in my district, and of course all of us on this dais, we spent probably the better part of two and a half hours discussing negotiations to move this thing forward. At the time we assumed that we had a logical agreement, all parties that were sitting here and going through the motions of discussing what needed to be done and directed. lt was voted on. Everybody concurred with it. Then of course it came back and I believe at that point in time is when Commissioner Coyle made the suggestion that this be moved on to the planning commission. And obviously we've run into a stalemate here. I believe that this needs to go to the planning commission to be vented (sic) and, as Commissioner Coyle brought up, is to make sure that the LDC as it was written at the time this was approved along with the GMP, that everything fits accordingly. I think that's where you're going with this thing. So I feel that -- and I think that the planning commission is looking forward to looking at this issue. I know I've had a number of calls from different people on the planning commission that would like very much to look at this whole SOP, so -- I hope that we've got support here so that this moves forward. And I believe there's already a date established, and I believe it's been advertised or about to be advertised, December the 12th, isn't it? MR. MUDD: The 12th or 13th of December. COMMISSIONER HALAS: So I would hope that we can move in that direction. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Commissioner Henning. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Well, you know, our staff could Page 52 ".1' , ,rq , ri ~~,f ' ~ ? November 28, 2007 evaluate and on seeing ifthere's any deviations from the Land Development Code and the impacts of it. COMMISSIONER COYLE: You want to really discuss that here now? I would -- if! can respond? COMMISSIONER HENNING: Yeah. COMMISSIONER COYLE: I'll be quite honest with you, I don't trust the staffs evaluation on these. lt was the staff that made the decision on Cap D'Antibes. Now, I'm not trying to be personally insulting, but I want somebody who looks at the larger issues. Time and time again we have had people come before us and tell us that there's a certain interpretation that should be applied of our codes. And just recently I saw one where there was a difference of opinion between the staff and the county attorney's office. And the county attorney was good enough to point out, no, that's wrong. Now, we all do that, you know. None of us has a perfect interpretation of these codes. And so I don't want to sound like I'm being critical of staff, because I think the comprehensive planning staff does a pretty dam good job, and they've been carrying a heavy load. The problem is, I want the broadest possible interpretation, or broadest possible review. That's all I'm saying. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Would you accept staffs recommendations also in addition to the planning commission? COMMISSIONER COYLE: Of course. COMMISSIONER HENNING: I understand where you're coming from, and I'm glad you clarified it's not demeaning to the staff, because some of us up here don't like that. But I understand where you're coming from now. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Yeah. That's why I didn't want to discuss it, because I didn't know how to say that without having it interpreted as being critical of staff, and that's not my intent. I just think that a lot of times we all focus on things that are Page 53 16 , '~~/!m 4 November 28, 2007 specific to our job assignment, and we don't necessarily look at it from a broader perspective. I do that. I think lots of other people too that, too. And so I just want the planning commission to have a shot at this. They are very capable. They delve into these issues in details. I want to know ifthere's any inconsistent language, anything confusing about this that's likely to be misinterpreted. I am right now somewhat confused about how the agreement and the PUD document correlate and whether or not there are any possible ways to interpret changes there. And I need to get that sorted out. And I'd like to have the planning commission's help. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: r think you have enough support to have that happen. Mr. Mudd understands. There's no questions? I think we're clear enough. Anything else, Commissioner Coyle? COMMISSIONER COYLE: No, that's it for me. Did we resolve that? I mean, is it okay? MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. Okay. COMMISSIONER HALAS: That's where we need to go. (Video presentation ends.) MR. SCHMITT: Again, that's the board's guidance. As far as the conduct of the meeting, I do have -- you have your books, we're going to provide you additional copies. I don't believe you want a complete set of all these. We'll give you the pertinent documents that are related to the plan review. There's three different SDPs here, some of it very detailed. And I don't believe you want that. rfyou want that, I'll certainly entertain any opportunity. I'd prefer, if you can make an appointment or we just come down and look at this, because these are fairly costly to reproduce. And if you want to come down and we'll set up a time. Any time for you to sit and review this with the staff is fine, if you want to look at the Page 54 if} i A 4;~mber 28, 2007 complete set. The specifics regarding the settlement agreement, that's the settlement agreement as drafted by the county attorney, and then that portion will be presented by the county attorney's office. By whom, I do not know. But that settlement agreement is the county attorney's document to the Board of County Commissioners. So with that, any questions, and we'll -- that pretty much concludes what I wanted to make sure you heard the board's guidance in regards to what the board is looking for from you at that December 13th meeting. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Joe, who is the CDES staff liaison on this issue with us? Who do we -- here's where I'm trying to go. I would want that our meeting on the 13th to be extremely productive. I would hope we wouldn't answer a lot of questions that are on the plans that are questions that are irrelevant in regards to whether they can be changed or not. Ifwe have questions that are questionable in regards to why is this pipe here, why is that there, call staff up and ask that question of them first rather than try to beat that to death at a public meeting. So I would like to know someone on staff who could be responding to questions that hopefully the commissioners would ask in regards to issues that may not need to come up in that kind of detail. MR. SCHMITT: I have different planners assigned for each of the three SDPs. So the person you would call -- there's three separate -- there's the golf course and there's others. But I -- to make this simple, I would prefer if you want to ask those questions, contact me or Susan Istanes. Either one of us or would be Ross Gochenaur. He is the chief back there responsible for plan review from that standpoint. But one of us three, to contact us and we'll get you an answer. And, again, if you want to set up a time to come and look at these plans, or just let me know 15 minutes before you come, and we'll make somebody's there and you can look at these plans in detail, if Page 55 161 November 28, 2007 ;"Jj I~' you so wish. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I know that these plans will be much more detailed than what this board normally receives. MR. SCHMITT: That's correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I would just not want us to have to go through a lesson in blueprint reading at our planning commission meeting on the 13th. I would rather that lesson be accomplished privately by each member with the staff people, if they see they need to do that. I certainly don't see that need myself. I've reviewed all these blueprints in detail. It's more a matter of interpretation of the settlement agreement language versus the PUD language and how that reflects in the blueprints. And you really don't need to get into some of the fine print of those blueprints to get to that point, so. Mr. Kolflat. COMMISSIONER KOLFLAT: In reference -- Commissioner Coyle made reference to Cap D'Antibes. I'm not familiar with that issue. Can you summarize how that relates to this subject? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Where is that, anyway? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: You talking about a writ of certiorari? MR. SCHMITT: Commissioner, I think it's best -- that's a long story. I could get with you off-line and discuss the whole background of it. lt's an issue from several years ago, almost five years ago or longer. lt had to do with a high-rise development in Pelican Bay. The last development -- it's the Water Park Place. lt's the last developable property in Pelican Bay. COMMISSIONER KOLFLAT: The only reason I bring it up, he mentioned it in his directive, and I want to be sure that I understood what the direction meant. Page 56 ..... , 'l" -?' I r:lk. ~,..., \-,,1 . J' 4, November 28, 2007 MR. SCHMITT: I'll get with you on that, if you wouldn't mind. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah, it's -- would be an interesting story . Mr. Adelstein, Mr. Murray and Mr. Vigliotti. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Basically, this place is going to be held as -- by of the Supreme Court of State of Florida under a Certiorari. Now, in that particular issue, certain things have to be done. And what I've read is the history of this. But the Certiorari itself can go on for another year or two years. We don't want to do that, we want to get rid of it. So the answer is to find out exactly what is the key that's going to hold it, because they will keep it open. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein, this is a Bert Harris claim that was filed. Under the statutes, a Bert Harris claim has to go through a settlement discussion that can take a certain amount of time. That's all this is. The county commission offered a settlement. The applicant countered the settlement. The commission said, you know, let's have the planning commission look at the settlement agreement. All we're looking at is the language of the settlement agreement, nothing else. The rest of the legal issues are way beyond this board's ability to be involved with. So the documents you get will be the proposed settlement agreement. Our objective is to read it, see where it's inconsistent with the PUD and the Land Development Code or where the terms in that agreement could have different impacts than that were intended in the other documents. And that's all we're supposed to be doing. Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I'm going to pass. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: We're getting our packages sent to us today, I believe? Page 57 161A 4 November 28, 2007 MR. SCHMITT: You have your books from the August meeting, which contain most everything you need that had the PUD. Then we sent a supplemental package in preparation for the meeting three weeks ago. I believe you got the updated version of the settlement agreement with that packet. We just had got this resubmittal. We'll go through and -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It wasn't three weeks ago. I have my packet that you provided, but it was provided to us but it was much more than three weeks, it was more like two months ago, when this first got remanded to us and it got canceled. So a lot of the members here may have misplaced their document. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: One packet or two? MR. SCHMITT: You have original -- a notebook, a large notebook that was from the August meeting. Then when it was rescheduled again, part of that we sent out a supplemental packet that included the revised settlement agreement. You did not get that? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: No. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That may be the one, I'm not sure -- I know everything you gave us, I have kept in a file box, and I have all mine, but I don't remember the second packet. MR. SCHMITT: We may still be holding that, but I thought the zoning staff sent that out. I'll check with Ray Bellows. When I get back this afternoon, we'll check. And we're going to get -- we'll make -- because there's a supplemental packet. There's a revised settlement agreement that is different than what you were given in August. The August one was much more detailed. This is now the revised one that was prepared by Mr. Pettit before he left employment with the county. And that was the final version. Jeff, I'm thinking Labor Day, around that time frame? MR. KLATZKOW: Yeah. Page 58 ".. ,':', ;, ;/. o!!""; "..Il.. ",.,.--" ~i f~ (C, '-'?!, November 28, 2007 MR. SCHMITT: And then we have additional drawings that we were going to provide to you. One of the things we still need to get to you are the elevations. But we did the site plans that showed the building separations, the setbacks from the various points of measurement for the property. Those are the documents -- I thought that we sent those out to you already. I'll make sure we get back today and they'll be sent to you so you can get prepared for that meeting. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think even -- since it's been 90 days, that would be helpful to do it again. Mr. Vigliotti? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Just so I'm clear, we're supposed to have a notebook revised from August, and you're going to send us -- MR. SCHMITT: I see the look on your face that nobody got that packet. So we may still have that or we held onto it when you continued the other meeting. But just for the record, just so you understand, we'll prepare another packet with the revisions that will go out to each one of you that will have -- I guess what I would call the documents that you need -- the pertinent documents that you may need in regards to the site plan and site layout and some of the things that you are going to deal with specifically with the settlement agreement, and make sure you have the revised settlement agreement as well. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: And what are we getting today? MR. SCHMITT: Nothing today. I'm just showing you today, this is the resubmittal packet. I would doubt you want to go through this entire packet. It's very detailed. As Mr. Strain mentioned, everything from -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, your utility-- MR. SCHMITT: -- water management to landscaping to all sorts of aspects of the site plan process. All you really need is the layout and the elevations. Page 59 16' A if November 28, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Those plan contain like your manhole cuts, your pipe cuts, your embedments for your gravel underneath your water lines. We don't need all that. That's a requirement of the SDP. But Joe, I think that the site plan-related information is the most critical. You have buffering information because buffering is an issue as well that's both in the PUD. And I think with any buffer plans, and most critical to show how the interpretation of the settlement agreement occurs is the elevation drawings which you haven't got yet but which we'll need. So if we have those along with the settlement agreement and a copy of the most recent PUD with any amendments, we're off and runnmg. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I do have -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer, then Mr. Murray. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And Joe, any reference drawn, please make them to full scale, not reduced, okay. In other words, if it's a 24 by 36 original, send us that. MR. SCHMITT: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yeah, this is more for Mr. Klatzkow. I remember Marjorie telling us that the settlement agreement essentially subordinates the PUD. And I'm trying to understand when I look at this, should I take that into consideration or consider them separately and then resolve the issue. MR. KLATZKOW: I think the board gave the planning commission some very specific direction. The board wants you to look at -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Everything. MR. KLATZKOW: -- everything. And to comment on everything. And -- Page 60 'f ( A 4 November 28, 2007 COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay, and that's what I will attempt to do. But it was haunting me that somehow this subordinates. So the issues that would be raised up in the PUD -- MR. KLATZKOW: This has more issues than an onion, quite frankly, this settlement at this point in time. But I think your direction is very clear, and I think it would be very helpful for the board to get that report. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I agree. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: One of the things that the settlement agreement does, it has language that explains what the PUD already explains. The problem is the way it's explained in the settlement agreement is different than the way the definitions are occasionally in the PUD. Those differences are what we have to understand how they will work on these plans and then tell the commission how that may differ from what the PUD intended. I'll give you an example. Measured setbacks. They're referring to habitable space. Well, you know, we don't refer to habitable space in the LDC. We refer to different points, surfaces of the buildings' walls. Well, if you measure from habitable space, that may have a different outcome than the measurement, if you were, to wall surfaces. Those are the kind of things when you read the settlement, and I've read it at least five times. If you read that agreement and then see how it fits to the PUD and the Land Development Code, you may find the language is not always identical. Ifit isn't, the BCC seems to want to know what does that mean, what are we getting then if we improve the settlement agreement and it changes those definitions? And if we feel it is an impact, we need to tell them that. And I think that's where we need to be going on the 13th. Mr. Klatzkow, ifthere's anything-- MR. KLA TZKOW: No, I think that's right. Page 61 1~~--"ln< -'. "'''' i U November 28, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good, then we will look forward to the 13th on that one. I had asked -- we just got over a break -- and I had asked -- Cherie? I keep forgetting to slow down. I am sorry. I will try again. Ifhe could have someone tell us when we have to be out of here. Now, I just got -- someone checked with Mary Joe downstairs, and she said we're scheduled in here till 11 :30. That wasn't the answer that I was looking for. The answer I was looking for is when does facilities management need to get in here. Because if they're going to take a lunch break like everybody else, we could work through lunch and get an extra hour in and be out of this and still have a late lunch for us, and they get in here on time. Is there any way by 11 :00 or 11 :30 we could find that answer out? MR. SCHMITT: I'll check. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. With that, Catherine, we're back on to the Land Development Code -- MS. FABACHER: Okay, we're going to go to Page 47, and this is going to be amendment to prohibited signs. Let's see, that's on Page 47. And Michelle Arnold's here to explain if you have any questions. I'd just like to say that on Page 48, there is a corrected reference on number E there, rotating signs or displays, except barber pole signs, complying with Section 5.06.04.C, cross out 12, add 13.B. And then on Page 50, under Subsection X, we added an exemption, or an exclusion for county transit vehicles, government vehicles providing information. That's an exemption from the prohibition against mounting signs on truck beds and other vehicles. Michelle Arnold's here, if you have any questions. MS. ARNOLD: For the record, Michelle Arnold. I did want to point out an additional corrective on Page 48, Paragraph C, same reference, just correcting them both. MS. F ABACHER: Thank you. Page 62 16' ' n .. I~ [:~Jl:J " " November 28,2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead. Any questions of -- Mr. Schiffer, then Mr. Vigliotti. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Michelle, on X, when you say county transit vehicle, is this where we're going to start putting billboards on the sides of buses and stuff? MS. ARNOLD: No. What kind of brought us to this amendment was we do have a code case where there is billboards on trucks driving through the community. And when we were reviewing the ordinance, the LDC, it was brought up that we need to take into account that our county transit buses do have small signs for informational items for the public so they know which bus to get on. And those are removable sIgns. So we're just including this exemption in there to recognize the county's bus system and the signage that is on there for informational purposes. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But the way this is worded, how do we know that it wouldn't allow an advertisement on the side of a county transit vehicle? I mean, the thing I fear is, so many buses where they put a screen on the side of it, you look through it, and then you have a -- MS. ARNOLD: Because it says providing information, not advertising. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Distract attention for the purposes of advertising, da, da, da, da, da -- excluding. So you're sure that that could never happen? MS. ARNOLD: This section is for prohibiting signage on vehicles. And the verbiage that we're adding is to exclude county vehicle -- transit vehicles for governmental vehicles providing information. So this is being included in the prohibition section, but we're excluding the prohibition from government transit vehicles providing information. Page 63 161 1'1 W ,~ lj. November 28, 2007 COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But doesn't that then mean they can do it. In other words, and I'm paraphrasing, and that may be a mistake, but it's -- you're not allowed to provide, for the purpose of advertising a business, products, service, et cetera et cetera -- excluding. And then in the exclusion is a county transit. So essentially could a county I transit be able to have advertising on the side of it? MS. ARNOLD: Maybe what we can do is take that comma out of there. And -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So you'd say county transit vehicles or government vehicles providing information. MS. ARNOLD: Right. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. I'm not against advertising, but I think Collier County is not a place where you want a lO-foot head sitting next to you in traffic looking at you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti, then Ms. Caron. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Michelle, why are you writing this, because you want to disallow the vehicles running around advertising now but yet let the county do it; is that where you're going? MS. ARNOLD: No, we already have a prohibition, in our opinion, in the code against vehicles with moveable signs driving around the county. This request is to recognize that the county has a bus system now, because this code was written prior to the county's bus system, and on that bus system there are moveable signage, but it's smaller and it's only providing information to the traveling public that is utilizing that system. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Okay, because I'm concerned, as Brad is, to wind up with advertising. I don't want the county to do advertising. MS. ARNOLD: That's not the intent at all. Page 64 r1~V A t.1'1 \ 'Ik, ' 4 hi . , db ~~', November 28,2007 COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Now could we tighten it up? Providing public information, instead of just providing information? Public service information? MS. ARNOLD: I guess I'll look to Jeff to see whether or not he feels that if we change it to county transit vehicles and governmental vehicles providing information -- COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'm just trying to tighten it up. MS. ARNOLD: -- do you think that tightens it up or -- MR. KLATZKOW: I'd have an issue the way it is. I don't have an issue with what you're suggesting, policy decision. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I just want to be reassured that it's not interpreted so they can do some advertising. So if it's information, it will be directional or public service information. MR. KLATZKOW: The way this is written, we could do advertising. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So Mr. Vigliotti's suggestion then would tighten it up. MR. KLATZKOW: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Public service information. MR. KLATZKOW: Which could also be a form of advertising, if you like. Collier County wants you to recycle every day, whatever, you know -- if you're okay with that. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Okay, no, let me go backwards then. Michelle, you're saying directional signs, like for instance we're going to a current destination? MS. ARNOLD: Yes, that's what's on the current bus system. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: And that's what you need? MS. ARNOLD: I just don't want to get into a situation -- I'm just looking for the benefit of the county. I don't want to get into a situation where they're looking at -- they're pointing to the signage that says on the CAT system Golden Gate Boulevard and, you know, Page 65 :11 ~6f-':' r November 28, 2007 someone conflicting that with advertising, because that's not the intent of it. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Instead of providing information or public service information, providing directional information, will that work for you? MR. KLATZKOW: You could say -- if you want to just limit this to county transit vehicles -- if what you're getting at, Michelle, is the CAT buses -- MS. ARNOLD: Right, that's all it is. MR. KLATZKOW: Then eliminate government vehicles providing information, okay. And then for your county transit vehicles, include language directional or route information. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'm okay with that. MR. KLATZKOW: I think that gets to your concern, sir. COMMISSIONER MURRA Y: I have a question. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: After Ms. Caron. Ms. Caron, then Mr. Murray. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Hey, what about me. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm sorry, Mr. Schiffer after Mr. Murray. COMMISSIONER CARON: I was happy with adding county transit vehicles or government vehicles providing public service information. I think that gets everybody to where they need to be. I think that's pretty simple. MS. ARNOLD: The language I have now, based on what Mr. Klatzkow indicated, has county transit vehicles providing directional and route information. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Mr. Murray, then Mr. Schiffer. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay, well, I'm going to-- sometimes the county will take one ofthe -- I think it's probably, I don't know, facilities management has these signs, sometimes the police have them where they can check speeds and they can put it up and they can make it provide information about Town Hall meeting or Page 66 16 I ~\ , November 28, 2007 whatever. MS. ARNOLD: Right, that would not be mounted on a vehicle, that's stationary in the roadway. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: It is mounted on a vehicle. It's a trailer. MS. ARNOLD: But when it's being utilized, it's stationary and not moving through the community. Those speed signs, to get there they'll mount it to locate it to whatever street location for the signage. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay, so this is clearly intending to -- okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Michelle, there's a trolly that runs around with tourists, is that thing in compliance? MS. ARNOLD: The trolly? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: It's a vehicle that has advertising. MS. ARNOLD: These are considered -- we're talking about moving signs. And the trolly I don't believe has moving signs on it. It has just stationary signage. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But this is signs mounted on a vehicle, you got it right there, be it on the roof, hood, trunk and so on, that are intended to attract or distract the attention of motorists. MS. ARNOLD: Well, a trolly when it's driving in Collier County would be not in compliance with this. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So that's not fair. MS. ARNOLD: Well, we're not addressing the trolly or -- we're not changing the language that it's currently in place. We are addressing just county transit facilities. And if you want to modify it to allow the trolly and not the CAT system or some other business, then that's something that you guys would need to determine. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The question is how would you Page 67 16 , !~ ."';1 .......~= November 28, 2007 grandfather in a vehicle? Because ifthey bought a new vehicle -- essentially we know, and that trolly does operate outside the City of Naples. I mean, we don't want that thing pulled over. I mean, that's -- so essentially this would cause that trolly to be not in compliance. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Michelle, you had said something in response to Mr. Schiffer the first time which I thought covered it, but -- and he's right, I didn't see it in here. You're talking about motion signs on vehicles. And if that is the intent of X, maybe if we clarify that, that solves the problem. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't know. If the intent from your comment was that this was signs that, you know, that -- I've seen that truck when it came through Collier County, and it was an absolutely eyesore. Anybody advertised -- I was shocked by seeing this thing, and it was certainly a distraction that would only lead, I think, to more accidents and more people being distracted on the road. I'm glad we're putting a stop to it. But I'm wondering by your comment, though, how this helps. Because your first -- by your comment it was motion signs, but if this doesn't read that way, maybe we're not getting where we need to be. Mr. Murray. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I just recalled that one day I was driving from way up north on 41, driving down, and I was surprised on the right-hand side there was a moveable sign such as on those vehicles, but it was stationary. And I was just wondering what -- I know that's outside ofthe scope of this at the moment, but I think it bears talking to and relating to, because it represents a distraction, and I don't know whether you want to embrace going further with this for that. And it was, I think, an organization like Moose or Elks or something of that nature, and I can't remember the organization. But I Page 68 Iff, A f, . 1ftl 4 .~. .'" November 28, 2007 was very surprised to see it. And you might want to have somebody go look. I believe it was stationary, there was no trailer or anything with it, it was a structure. So if you're getting at that effort, I would think you might want to take a look at that. Just a thought. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think, Michelle, with the input you've got from us, maybe you could take a second look at this language and make sure it's really addressing what it is that we're supposed to be here. MS. ARNOLD: I think the language as it's been modified today would be all inclusive to whether or not the county's transit system has a stationary sign or a moving sign. So -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I agree with you, but aren't you trying to get rid of motion signs on those vehicles and -- MS. ARNOLD: Well, no, the intent of this amendment is not to address the motion signs. I guess I wasn't real clear. When we were going through that particular case, we were doing a full review of our sign code. And it was brought up that, you know, we don't really have anything in our sign code for the transit system. And so we're just simply trying to have that inclusion in there. We're not trying to modify or clean up our ordinance to address motion signs at all, because we already have a pending lawsuit and we don't want to give the impression that that's the reason why we're doing that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Gotcha. And I understand now. So the review of the code for one reason sparked the concern over the other -- MS. ARNOLD: Exactly. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- and the other simply was to have county transit vehicles legal for providing directional routing information. MS. ARNOLD: Absolutely. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So we focus on just that issue, we Page 69 A November 28, 2007 could pass this form of the LDC, and any other questions we can bring up at some other future date. Does that work for everybody? So the language suggested to be changed is simply to be county transit vehicles providing directional or routing information. And then we'd strike the words government vehicles providing information. MS. ARNOLD: Right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: With that, I think we have an acceptable language situation here in this amendment? Is there a motion that we recommend approval of 5.06.06, Prohibited Signs? COMMISSIONER CARON: So moved. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: So moved. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made by Commissioner Caron, seconded by Commissioner Midney. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER KOLFLA T: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Mark, can I ask Michelle a question? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Of course. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Michelle, so that means that the trolly, I guess, really has always been out of compliance, then; is that Page 70 lrl A 4 November 28, 2007 right? MS. ARNOLD: Yes, Brad, you're making it an issue. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: All right. Thanks. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I was afraid of that. That's why I was trying to get past it, Michelle. MS. FABACHER: Commissioners, we have one more short one for Michelle to discuss, on Page 137, and that is going to be in Page 137 of your book, and it's Section 5.03.02, Fences and Walls. And basically we had noted that the old coded had required a building permit for fences and walls, and it was omitted -- that provision was omitted during recodification. And staffs requesting it be returned. Page 137. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, any questions on page -- starts on page 137 and goes through page 139. Basically, the item number ten is what the whole issue is about. Nine has a little bit of language added. Any questions or concerns? Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The building code always has and always will require a permit, so why is this necessary? MS. ARNOLD: I think because there's language currently in our Land Development Code that confuses the issue about whether or not a permit is required for a fence. And we're just wanting to put it back in so that there's clarification that yes, you need a permit for a fence. It's a building code -- it's more just for simplification purposes. It was there before, it wasn't hurting anything before it was omitted. I think it just created more confusion with the omission out of the LDC than simplifying it for the public. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So somebody actually came forth and said oh, I don't need a permit for my fence? Because the Land Development Code is silent on it. MR. KLATZKOW: I think this could become an issue in a code enforcement case, where somebody would get brought into because Page 71 1~61~ November 28, 2007 they failed to get a permit for a fence and the LDC is a little bit hazy on this. So that would just end this issue. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It doesn't hurt to duplicate in this particular case. Go ahead, Mr. Murray. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: However, I remember Mr. White making the point that the purpose for recodification was to eliminate redundancies and other things. So it's a balancing act, isn't it, it really IS. MR. KLATZKOW: We eliminated a lot more than redundancies, unfortunately. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think the redundancy that he was looking to eliminate was within the LDC itself -- MS. ARNOLD: Within the LDC. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. And this is not a redundancy in the LDC, this is a clarification to the LDC that fixes the redundancy of the fact that we have to have it now reviewed by the LDC as well as the building code. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yes, I agree. But I was also aware that he was talking about taking things out of the LDC that were properly in the building code. So that's what I was making reference to. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, anyway. Are we -- anybody else have any comments on pages 137 through Page 139? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'd like to make a motion. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti, go ahead. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'd like to make a motion for approval with the changes we just discussed. COMMISSIONER CARON: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That is for LDC Section 5.03.02.A? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Motion's been made by Mr. Page 72 16, r, 4 November 28,2007 Vigliotti, seconded by Ms. Caron. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER KOLFLA T: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. MS. ARNOLD: Thank you, Commissioner. MS. FABACHER: Commissioners, our next -- I know we had given out a tentative agenda, but we've swapped around again a little bit because Nick could join us. And we'd like to go next to street system requirements. That would be on Page 53 in your book. And it's going to deal with Section 6.06.01 and Section 10.02.13. And just to give you some background, at your request when we revised the PUD document we asked everyone to take out all the redundant language. Well, transportation had some issues with their comments, because they were not included in the LDC. So this is an attempt by the transportation department to comply with your direction to put more or less their boilerplate language into the LDC so it doesn't need to be repeated. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Finally. MR. CASALANGUIDA: For the record, Nick Casalanguida. I want to give credit to -- John Podczerwinsky's worked really hard on this. He's on the development review staff in the back. There you go. Page 73 16 'No~emb~ 28,2007 As you go through it, the only thing that's really different that you've asked us to include is on Page 44, number three. Commissioner Strain, you repeatedly said why are sites under construction and don't have the appropriate turn lanes in there. So we've added that language that we've been sticking into the PUDs currently to date. The rest of the language is pretty much consistent what's in our standard boilerplate PUD language. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I was pleased to see this. It wraps up or cleans up -- Ray Bellows has been for a long time attempting to clean up the PUD process, and this was one lingering problem. So this works out real well. Anybody have any questions, comments? Starts on Page 53 and goes through Page 57. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I have one. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead, Mr. Schiffer. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: On Page 55, it's H.3. What exactly does that mean? Or let me tell you what I think it means, tell me if I'm right or wrong. If somebody has to put a turn lane, if that turn lane is being built on land within the county right-of-way, that that person would have to pay the county for that land. MR. CASALANGUIDA: They would reimburse the county through providing right-of-way adjacent to that turn lane. In other words, you have a utility line or, you know -- what happens often is you put in a turn lane and you're now reducing the ability for the county to provide either a sidewalk or utilities. So you have to provide compensating right-of-way for that turn lane. And that's been standard PUD language since I've been here. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: My question isn't expanding the right-of-way. That I fully understand. It's that this is talking about within the right-of-way. So are you essentially paying them to build that portion of a turn lane within the right-of-way? Page 74 16~ November 28, 2007 ,',,' l,iJl L,.,..~ U MR. CASALANGUIDA: No, sir. What they're doing -- if they have to put in a turn lane in the county-owned right-of-way that we've acquired or has been dedicated prior, they have to provide compensating right-of-way for that turn lane. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'm not sure it really says that, though. MR. CASALANGUIDA: If any required turn lane improvements requires the use of existing county rights-of-way or easements, then compensating right-of-way shall be provided at no cost to Collier County as a consequence of such improvement upon final approval of the turn lane design during the first subsequent development order. That's standard PUD language that we've used. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. All right. So if you're going to use up 10 feet for a turn lane, you've got to add 10 feet. MR. CASALANGUIDA: You've got to, in your property, dedicate 10 feet back to Collier County. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: All right. Thanks. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: A master plan is created, eventually a development order is issued. MR. CASALANGUIDA: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: On Page 54, number two, where it says access points shown on a PUD master plan are considered to be conceptual. My note is until when? Is it pertinent there to have a clarification, or it's understood? MR. CASALANGUIDA: It's understood. The PUD master plan, we don't like to have too much specificity. It's always the Catch-22. You'd like to see a site plan at that time, and it's hard for staff to review a site plan at the same time there've reviewing the PUD, because things change. So just to say to the applicant you can show the arrows on your PUD master plan and when you go to do your actual site plan we'll Page 75 ',1 ~ I' fl I......,.., 161 November 28, 2007 adjust that based on what you're putting on the site. Different projects may require different site access requirements. But you're not going to get any more access points unless you amend the PUD. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay. Good, thanks. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any other questions about the transportation issues? Mr. Vigliotti. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'd like to make a motion, if there's no other questions. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any speakers of the public? MS. FABACHER: No, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, go ahead. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'd like to make a motion to approve with all the changes here. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I'll second the motion. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Now, the motion you're making is to approve the changes in Section 6.06.01, Street System Requirements and 10.02.13, Planned Unit Development Procedures. Is that right? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: As on Page 53, correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And the second? COMMISSIONER CARON: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Caron was the second, Mr. Vigliotti was the motion maker. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I was. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, Mr. Adelstein, ifit matters, then you can be -- it's irrelevant. Everybody would be willing to second it, so let's just leave it like that. Okay. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All those in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER KOLFLA T: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. Page 76 161 A 4 November 28, 2007 COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries. Thank you. Just in case we're not going to get another chance to take a break or we go longer, we'll take a 10-minute break now for the court reporter. And then when Joe gets back maybe we'll be able to find out when we can officially stop. (A break was taken.) (Commissioner Kolflat is absent from the boardroom.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, we're back from our break and during that amount of time Mr. Schmitt found out we can stay here till 1 :00 today, so we will continue. If the planning commission so agrees, we'll break at 1 :00 and that will be -- we'll just go right through lunch and stop at 1 :00. Is that okay with everybody else? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: No. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I'll be leaving earlier. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, that still leaves us a quorum, so we will still continue. Okay, Ms. Fabacher, let's go on. MS. FABACHER: Okay, Commissioners, thank you. We're going to move next to interim watershed management regulations. That's on page 7 in your book. And that is going to be a list of section numbers. These would be amending Section 3.07.00. It's on -- I'm sorry, it's on Page 17 in your book. Forgive me, Page 17 in your book. Page 77 16 Jo~mb~ 28, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: By the way, you're going in and out on your mIC. MS. FABACHER: Okay. All right. This will include Section 3.07.00, Section 6.05.01, Section 10.02.02, Section 10.02.03, Section 10.02.04. And thank you for your correction, it is on Page 17 in your book. And Mr. Wiley is here to answer any questions that you might have. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, Mr. Wiley, welcome. MR. WILEY : Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: How are you? MR. WILEY: I'm doing fine, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any questions? This starts on Page 17 and we go all the way, looks like it's a long one. But a lot of it is existing language. MR. WILEY: Correct. What you'll notice, this is Robert Wiley for the record, with the Engineering Services Department. You'll notice that at the very front is the addition of the new language under 3.07.01.02. That's the new language. The rest of the stuff, basically you go all the way to the very ends of each of the sections, you'll see just a reference to go back to 3.07 in the different areas of development applications that would come in. There's a lot of paperwork, but most of it is just a copy. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Since most of the language is on Page 18, do we have any questions from the -- this particular document from the planning commission? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I do, Mark, one small one. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, and we also have more continuing language on 20. Go ahead, Brad. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: On 18.C at the bottom of the page, the intent there is it's only within those zones that you are to Page 78 "I' 6' i~ 4 11 ' [(~(\ 'of' ~, db ' l' November 28, 2007 provide this; is that right? MR. WILEY: No, sir. No, sir. In C, what we're saying is when you are within these three flood zones A, AE and VE, you have to evaluate it. We're not saying you have to provide it. And the difference being that there are some coastal properties that there's no way we would have any reason to claim a benefit by trying to keep out the Gulf of Mexico. But we want the evaluation, because some of those zones are also from freshwater inland flooding which is trying to come towards the coastline. So that's why we're simply saying they would do the eval uation. Now, there is the stipulation that says they should also be evaluated for areas known to be periodically inundated by intense rainfall or sheet flow conditions. And those would be areas that may or may not be in an A, AE or VE zone. They could be other areas throughout the county. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So obviously the intent is not to maintain storm surge, although that would be nice for the county if they could. But I'm still-- so where does this not apply then? For example, if you're in an X zone, what do you do? MR. WILEY: In an X zone, if it happens to be an area that we know has a flooding problem -- remember, our X zone is strictly limited from coastal surge flooding. There is no current flood map produced by FEMA which identifies rainfall induced flooding. Some of our known areas of flooding problems, street and yard flooding, are in the X zone portion of the county. So we're saying if we know these areas are out there, we also want those to be evaluated for floodplain storage compensation. It happens to be because the way our floodplain map is delineated by FEMA. Now, as you know, we're in the process of producing a new flood map which will address rainfall flooding, but Page 79 161 A 4 November 28, 2007 we're not there yet. And if you want, I can show you a map, just to give you an indication of what we're talking about. Let's look at your visualizer now. What we did was we took the map that we currently have available, we called it our bubble map. Those little circled bubble-type type of red circles, those are areas that we know have a problem with a lot of street and yard flooding, sometimes even house flooding. Then we also took an evaluation off the GIS to just identify where are the areas which have, on the GIS evaluation, a hydroperiod of two months or greater to show you the big flowways. These are the types of areas that we are talking about. As you'll notice, there's a lot of the county that would not be here. But this just gives an indication to you. Again, this map doesn't show you the A, the AE and the VE zones, because that's another layer we could have added but it sort of cluttered the map up. We're trying to show you other places that we would be wanting the evaluation to take place. And then it's up to staff and the applicant to come to an agreement on whether an evaluation is provided or not provided. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Where is that map available to the public? MR. WILEY: Well, I got it yesterday. So that's how draft this thing is. Weare not really set on adopting this map. This was just sent up here for an example for you to see. But this is in our county GIS system. We can make it readily available for anybody who wanted to look at. This would be the type of mapping, once we really narrow it down, define the areas to make sure that we're satisfied with particularly the green areas that are identified as wetlands on here, meaning they have a hydroperiod of two months or greater, you'll see those are your flowways. This map could be made available. It's no Page 80 .:fII!< '" r'f., , b)~. ~':1 K~, ,~) f .,,, t "-, November 28, 2007 problem. I would be on the GIS layer system. But this is just to give an indication since we have had the question asked us by other people, well, is my property in or out of it. This is the type of consideration we would wanting to work as a tool to help everyone understand why we would consider the evaluation necessary . And of course this being in GIS you can superimpose over property lines, it's easy to work with at that point. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Question. Based upon the -- I'm sorry. Based upon our ability of sight conditions, some projects may incur substantial fiscal impacts. Could you explain that and maybe give me an example from the beginning. MR. WILEY: The fiscal impact that we're talking about here deals with a situation, a property -- for instance, look at this map here -- happens to be in an area which is identified as a flowway. And the property comes in and it is required to set back a certain portion of the property just to allow the water to continue to store on that property. They could not develop it. It's called an importer property. You import more water onto your property than you actually create from the rainfall. That can have a significant impact. That can affect sometimes 20,25 percent of your property's buildability under the scenario that if you do not have a current condition that's being evaluated and you're anticipating just going in and filling the whole property. And we've had that particular situation arise already. And we addressed it through the South Florida Water Management District permitting criteria that we use for regulating it by anyway. But that's where we say it can have some significant impacts to certain properties which are entirely within flowways or depressional storage areas. It would affect their ability to just construct under normal fill and build type situation. Page 81 16 I A ,i~ November28, 2007 COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Is this only for new projects going forward? MR. WILEY: This would be for new development and for redevelopment. And in the case of redevelopment, it's probably not near as applicable, this particular scenario would not be. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: So it doesn't or does not apply to? MR. WILEY: It would apply for redevelopment, yes, sir, as well as new development. But we're not saying that you would have an existing development where nothing is transpiring, they would not have to all want to be found in default and have to provide it. But it's if they come in for any kind of development application, we would evaluate it. The situation that we're looking at is if we know we have a problem, let's don't make it worse in the redevelopment issue. If you have a development which is low, it's already flooding, you want to come back in, redevelop it, just fill everything up, well, if you're already bringing water off site onto the property, make sure that evaluation takes that into account, because you don't want to pass that property (sic) onto another neighboring property. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other questions? Mr. Wiley, on Page 18 you're talking about increasing the treatment area to 150 percent, that it goes from one to one-and-a-half inches. It's volumetric, I assume, so that would be done by depth? MR. WILEY: Depth and/or area, depending upon the vertical distance you had in your system design. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So by doing this, you're creating more holding water, but you're going to require more clearing. MR. WILEY: More -- by clearing, you mean removing vegetation? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, you can't have this area used-- you can't utilize the preserve or native habitat areas for your water Page 82 , / r,' A" ,4' "t ,I November 28, 2007 retention, so you're going to have to increase your water retention area. And if you do it by excavation to get the volume area you're required, would that increase the clearing needs for a project? MR. WILEY: Potentially it could, yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Under C, where you have the word evaluated, the GMP is our conceptual document in which we state that we have to perform certain ways, and the LDC is the implementation document. And I'm wondering where the word evaluated is -- how is that? Who knows what the -- I just come to you and say I've evaluated this and it's okay, or what's the evaluation criteria? MR. WILEY: There's a process that you go through, the engineering community knows about it. Where already doing it through the water management district regulations to where you're making a determination of the amount of water that is stored on your property predevelopment. And if that amount of water is more than what your development creates by simple rainfall coming on it, you're considered an importer. If you're within an area that goes through an inundation state, you're either an importer or an exporter. So the criteria is already out there through the district. That's the evaluation we're talking about, so that you're showing that the floodplain storage is not being diminished by the development on the property . CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I don't think the word evaluation is a good word to have, because it's ambiguous. It may mean something to you, but I bet you with just that word, I could argue it would means something different to me and probably be on the same ground you're on. So I'm wondering if you have a way of putting in here a more precise reference than the word evaluated to what you just tried to say. Is it like an ERP process with South Florida? Is there wetland juris -- is there some process that you go through that -- you just said Page 83 ;J 16 Ii:' ~r:, r November 28, 2007 the engineering knows this. So what is it that they know, what is it called? When you ask an engineer to do this work, what would you specifically say as a type of evaluation you're asking for? MR. WILEY: It's simply floodplain storage compensation calculation. But I put the word evaluation in here because we also, talking to Mr. Schiffer at the initial discussion here, there are some situations that because it's coastal surge coming in and a VE zone, you're not going to hold out the Gulf of Mexico by development, because we're not designing them to withstand that 1 OO-year event from the coastal. So that's sort of where the word evaluation, you look to see is there a need to do the calculation. And then if there is a need to do the calculation, then the system for doing the calculation is already predetermined. Ifwe need to clarify that just to state that, I'll be glad to do so. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, you know, it all boils down to what is legally defensible. If Mr. Klatzkow has no problem with the word evaluate, I don't have a problem with it. MR. KLATZKOW: I'm okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. The last sentence you have, areas known to be periodically inundated by intense rainfall. And I now know that the way it's known is by this map. How does that map know? Where do you get the data from the map from? MR. WILEY: This is information that we have within the county's GIS system right now. And there are various layers that we have for periods of inundation. And Mack Hatcher is here, he can explain a lot more detailed about it than I can. But we took an old map that was developed by the stormwater management department, which we call our bubble map, that's the little red circles you see on there. And that's just areas that we Page 84 r /' I' c" :) ~. P" '\f iii Ii ('~-;1 ' November 28, 2007 traditionally, historically, whatever words you want to use for it, when you get a big rain event you know you're going to start getting telephone complaints [rom properties in this area that streets are underwater, my yard's underwater. It's up against my house. These are areas that we know that if you start filling in that land, you want to pass water onto some other property that's not having as bad a problem today as it may tomorrow. We then superimpose the two maps together. And again, the periods we used here for the areas of green are called wetlands, that's the information for hydroperiods of two months or longer that we have within the GIS system. And it's calculated based upon elevations and mapping and things. That's where this example map comes from. Not that we are suggesting that this is the exact final product map. This gives an indication to help people understand we're not saying that if you're in Collier County, that's automatically you're within this area. We're looking at the serious areas where you know you have the major flows and storage of water in the big rain events. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Some of that what I heard you say in the beginning is some of this map is created from people calling in with complaints that there's water in their streets? MR. WILEY: That's where we got the little red circles off our bubble map. That was years ago that we did that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The only reason is, I mean, I've driven through those areas many times, and I've watched the county crews come in and they clear out a clog in the pipe and all of a sudden there's no flooding there. But yet 100 people may have called in about their street being flooded. I also know that streets are designed to flood. That's where some of the water is supposed to be held in your irregular storm events. And you might lose a lane on a four-lane road, so the two higher lanes on the inside are up higher. Page 85 r'" , , '4j , November 28, 2007 But I'm not sure that's -- I hope you didn't use that kind of criteria or you balanced that out when you took these phone calls and decided an area was prone to flooding. MR. WILEY: If it was area that was limited strictly to a lack of maintenance -- I mean, I've got to be careful how I say that, because sometimes there's a region which has an overall pattern of lack of maintenance, which causes the water, it's not just a single pipe. In looking at this, these are areas that while -- went to sleep again -- it -- sometimes these areas can be cleared up if there is a serious capital project-level type of replacement and maintenance. And sometimes they can't. Other areas, you'll see on here are just areas that always go underwater. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, well, I don't want to belabor the point, I understand what you're saying, I just wanted to understand how the map points got there. And I think you've clarified that for me. On Page 20, Item D, the fifth line, you talk about wetland or wet. And this is probably better for Mr. Murray to respond to than you even. That word, I don't even know how to say it rather than understand what it means. Is that such a word? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: What, the fifth line, what is it? MR. WILEY: Wet facultative. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Oh, facultative. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: See, you even said it wrong, Mr. Wiley, or somebody did. What in the world does that mean? Is that not a misspelling or is that a real word? MR. WILEY: That is a real word and it is a wetland plant, but it is able to live wet or dry. It can live in either environment. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Nice way of saying it, I guess. MR. WILEY: I did not make the word up. I have been accused of that, but this one I didn't create it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Under E, it says all new development Page 86 "ft'I')? ',A 4 . !-~", L -'. .>i ;, November 28, 2007 and redevelopment projects shall ensure surrounding properties will not be adversely impacted. Well, the word ensure has always been a problematic word, from what I can tell. I'm just wondering why the word ensure needs to be there. MR. WILEY: We talked about this in various other meetings that we've had, and we're not providing insurance, I-N, but it's an assurance that the design has taken into consideration where the water's coming towards the property predevelopment, where it's going after development, so that you don't pass it on to someone else. If ensure is not a good word -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Use assure. MR. WILEY: Assure is A-S-S-U-R-E, ifthat's a better word, I'm agreeable to that. We just want to make -- the purpose is to put forth the effort in the design and the approval process to -- here I'm starting to use the word ensure again, but to address the issues sufficiently so that that's not going to be a problem. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, 1 don't know why you need the word ensure. Why can't it read all new development and redevelopment projects -- well, I see, okay. Shall not cause any impacts from that project's influence on stormwater sheet flow. I think you could reword it to take out the word adversely and the word ensure. I think both of those words might be arbitrary. That's all I'm going at. If you can figure out a way to do that, I think it would help. But that's my thoughts on it. And then F, isn't that already in the code? In the LDC? MR. WILEY: I think it is. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You can't get it -- MR. WILEY: I'm not certain, that's why I stuck it in here -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- a development order without -- and this is the redundancy that we talked about earlier. This is under your Page 87 16/ ,1." 1/1 ~.,. ".I-" . , November 28, 2007 SDP permitting and your platting and all that. You can't get final development orders without your state and federal environmental permits. So why would we repeat it here? You have a process section, Section 10 of the LDC. MR. WILEY: Right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And all that's required in that process section. So I don't know that that needs to be repeated within the code itself. MR. WILEY: I would have to defer to someone who knows the code better than me. MS. FABACHER: We'll double check on that, Commissioner. MR. WILEY: I'm not trying to repeat something, 1 was just wanting to make sure this was -- in the past there has been some issue raised that a development order was approved by the county prior to an agency issuing a permit. And this was tried to head that off so that claim could not be made again. But if it's already in there, I have no problem removing it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: As far as the only other thing I brought up was E. And again, I'll defer to the county attorney on this, Jeff, the words ensure and adversely. MR. KLATZKOW: I could rewrite this, but then end result's going to be the same meaning. I'm okay with, quite frankly. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Then I'll drop my issue on that. Anybody else have any other issues on this language? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I do, but Robert was first. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti, then Mr. Schiffer. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: All new development and redevelopment. What is redevelopment specifically, and what triggers redevelopment for an existing project? MR. WILEY: Redevelopment as I think of it, and I'll give you my rationale for this, is when you have an existing development and someone wants to come in and has a significant impact upon the Page 88 ~. ,f fl 50" I" J~) 'J': " fr."' 1(.,-< I. ' """ , Novemoer 28, 2007 physical structure or impervious area on the property so that there is an increase in impervious area, even potentially an increase in fill so that you are having an impact on the stormwater system. You have the potential to either prevent water from coming onto the property or you're passing more water off the property. That's where this redevelopment comes in. That doesn't mean you want to haul out the inside of a building and just renovate inside. We're talking about physical footprint impacts. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: But if we don't have a specific definition of redevelopment, I believe. Do we? MS. FABACHER: We had been working on some draft language with DSAC on that. Do you have that draft language? MR. WILEY: I have the e-mail that you sent to me, the draft language we put together. We can pass that to everyone -- MS. F ABACHER: Why don't you just -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You guys, again, please, wait for one to finish before the other speaks. MS. F ABACHER: Why don't you go ahead and read it off. MR. KLATZKOW: Put it on the monitor. MR. WILEY: I have extra copies, if you all would like to have it in your hands right now. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: This is interesting. If you're now coming up with language to define redevelopment, and redevelopment is something that's part and parcel to this floodplain management language, how is it we can approve one today without the other? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: We can't. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And to be honest with you, I think we probably need some time to think about the definition you've just passed out. MS. F ABACHER: Commissioner, just to answer, I think it's part of the process that we get some guidance from you and we look at Page 89 '" 161,~ /; November 28, 2007 these things. We always get a lot of comments. It's never 100 percent -- it's always under review, while we're working on it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: If you realize there's no definition for redevelopment, and you put it in here and leave it open ended, if no one asks the question, then where does it go? MS. F ABACHER: No, we do have this issue, it's before the DSAC still. So we're going back to DSAC in December to answer this Issue. There are some sections of the code, such as the architectural standards, which do define redevelopment for the purposes of that section, but not -- as far as stormwater, it's a different thing. It's really more about impervious area than any amount of square footage or value of an addition, which is the way it works for the architectural standards. I mean, we don't have a broad definition of redevelopment that fits every circumstance in the code. I don't think we could. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, okay. But for this floodplain management change, we need to have something for redevelopment. Mr. Midney. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: It seems to me like this definition, which limits it just to the increase of impervious area, is pretty clear to me. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I'm just wondering how you decide when that impervious area is triggered. Because it's looking for a percentage of a building footprint. And then in the second sentence, it's looking for an assessed value percentage. I think those are the parts of the redevelopment definition that we would need completed. And I'm wondering why we wouldn't just maybe follow the FEMA guidelines in that regard. FEMA's triggered floodplains are-- you have to come under new floodplain heights if a certain portion of Page 90 lilt! A 4 ~\.....j , November 28, 2007 your building is destroyed or a monetary value has to be replaced, and that's already a given. Why don't we look at that. MR. WILEY: The issue is exactly what you're saying. Do we want to use the FEMA default guideline of 50 percent ofthe value. That's why the number, if you'll notice, was blank. We're still discussing among ourselves, do we want to go with the default 50 percent value or do we want to make it higher or lower. The rationale behind possibly going lower is where we're heading in with the amendments to our flood protection ordinance is we will be benefitting the county in our CRS scoring -- it's a complicated trail here -- but by simply saying at 49 percent, not 50. So that's where we're looking to amend our current ordinance to go to 49. So the question is, do we want this to already say 49 or 50. That's why the line's blank right now, while we're discussing this with various people who are providing input to the definition. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: See, for the definition purposes, they get you out of that hook, since that percentage is going to be defined elsewhere then in the code, why don't you just reference to whatever the FEMA standards are for the county, adopted by the county. MR. WILEY: That would be a great way to do it, sir, because at that point the definition already exists. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. But if the definition changes for the FEMA, then it automatically corrects itself with this definition here. Yes, Ms. Fabacher? MS. F ABACHER: That's a different issue, though, because you're looking at flood damages, and the flood damages could be exclusively to the interior of a home and you could trip the 50 percent. It doesn't matter to us in items of stormwater management, it does not matter to us what you do to the inside of your building. It doesn't matter. You could spend $500,000 replacing the all the fixtures and Page 91 1,., l" I '" ~! 6 J i\, , rl, November 28, 2007 remodeling and removing the walls. It wouldn't have any impact on your impact on stormwater. You could add another story to your building, it would not change your footprint, it would not change the stormwater runoff that you need to deal with. And the reason that we're looking at another number to be fair, because there are a lot of properties that will be wanting to do some renovations that are not going to be compliant, because they're not compliant with South Florida Water Management District permits right now. And I think if you look at the DSAC comments, the thing has been, these are interim standards before the real standards comes down. But they're like, where will be the relief for the small property owner that this might be a burden on. I don't know that 50 percent and following FEMA would be a good guideline. We tried to look at the factors that will influence it the most. And your impervious area will increase your runoff. No amount of changes to the inside of your building will. So that's why we were trying to go away from -- not follow the FEMA. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I was looking more at the fact if someone is 49 or 50 percent damaged, destroyed or to a point where they got to -- they lose their evaluation to that point, whatever remodeling or rework effort they do to their property would then trigger enough redesign to address the newest and latest floodplain management rules that we would have. I was just looking at some points -- MS. F ABACHER: I understand where you're coming from. We're looking for any help that we can get. We're still trying to figure this one out. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer was next again, then Mr. Vigliotti after that. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: A couple of things. First thing, Page 92 71 ~ I """', c' j~ ;0 V'I f "'!QL . November~8, 2007 Mark, go back to 18.C at the bottom of the page where you were concerned about, and I share this with you, the word evaluated. In building code land, to avoid somebody just walking up there and saying yeah, that looks good, they add the phrase, via rational analysis, which essentially means someone's doing some calculations and stuff like that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What's the phrase? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Via rational analysis. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh, okay. That sounds a lot better. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The virtue of that is it just keeps somebody from sitting there whistling with their hands in their pocket saying that looks good. And then the other thing is the thing Robert just handed out. One of the things you're doing is coming up with a percentage that would apply to the building square footage or the impervious site area. So essentially, if somebody has a big patio or has a patio that they're building on top of, they're not increasing the impervious at all. So what's the intent there, is that you would -- if that patio is large enough to hit this percentage, it would require -- but essentially you're not changing the impervious area of the site. So, you don't need to answer what percentage, but I think that's a bad idea to equate those two things together. You might want two different percentages, one for one and one for the other. And that's it. MR. WILEY: If you would allow me to address that issue. If you have an existing patio and then you decide you simply want to enclose it, you have not increased the impervious area at all, so therefore it would not be applicable. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right, but the way this is worded, there's increase the building size or -- so you're using Boolean logic. You know, the building size could trigger the need for something when essentially you're not increasing the impervious. So my only suggestion is, those are two good concepts, separate Page 93 l~ 161 n 4 November 28, 2007 them. And maybe there's two different percentages for each. Let's say, Robert, I have a really large patio. The patio is greater than 50 percent of my house, and that's your number. And I, you know, enclose it. I've essentially done nothing to the impervious area of the site but I would trigger the need -- this would be considered then, the renovation, or reconstruction, whatever you want to call it. Does that make sense? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I think that was the intent. I think the intent was to catch some major renovations, whether they are just to impervious or not, to bring in things that weren't to the current code and make them comply if they go to a certain extent of expenditure or percentage of redevelopment. I don't know if it was just impervious area, because if you leave it as just impervious area are you catching all the people that may not now be in compliance? How do you catch them when they come back in for a major renovation? So something else other than just impervious area may trigger a major renovation, to bring other places into compliance that may not be able to be brought into compliance otherwise. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well, you know, ifthey have a large impervious area right now, then in fair play, I don't think -- it's kind of too late to get them. I mean, is that the intent, Bob? If I have a really big patio in the back of my house and I'm going to increase -- I'm going cover it. That would increase my building square footage 50 percent, you want me to be considered reconfiguration? MR. WILEY: No, sir. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: You do? MR. WILEY: No, sir. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. Then what 1 would do-- MR. WILEY: You have not increased your impervious area of your property. The distinction we were making is you have properties Page 94 '" A lL:6 1 4 November 28, 2007 that have a huge impervious area outside the perimeter of the building, that they not address changing a building, but they may change impervious area outside the building, such as a parking lot or something. So that's where the two issues -- and I had not even thought ofthe concept of you have a patio, you're just going to enclose it, that would increase your building size. I hadn't even thought of that concept. And the intention is not to catch that person as much as it is if you're actually making your building bigger, you're changing your parking lot, you know, for commercial property, things of that nature. You want to pick up, because they're creating an increase or they're filling in an area that's already storing water, a parking lot that's known to flood all the time. You're wanting to catch that so that you, through the development process, you're also alleviating problems that are already out there. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right. And my only suggestion is to separate the two, that's all. You know, building footprint is one thing, impervious is another thing. And come up with maybe different percentages. MR. WILEY: That's a very good point of clarification. So that you understand where I was coming from. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: But ifthe intent is to correct some problems that already exist during a redevelopment phase, I don't see why you wouldn't be looking at a situation like Brad talked about. If it's 50 percent or more of the building that's going to be redone and we know already there are water management issues, why wouldn't you take that opportunity to get them corrected during the renovation period? MR. WILEY: Well, the discussion's basically been along the lines in an attempt to be fair and equitable to property owners. If they are not creating additional runoff then why would we penalize them? Page 95 16; A Novembe~8, 2007 It's the same -- I know you're saying you have an existing problem. Yes, we do know that situation is out there. But we're trying to be as fair as we can so that we don't face some claims of -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't think the issue is you're not -- you're trying to penalize them or not. I think what happened is we have buildings that were erected 20,30,40 years ago that back then had very little, if any, compliance for water runoff, water quality, water treatment. People come in and buy those old buildings and they think what's the best way I can make some money off this building.lfIjust renovate the inside and resell it, I don't have to trigger any changes to the outside. And as a result I can still keep my poor water quality and dump everything on my neighbors and not have to worry about it. But yet I've made a windfall over my renovations that I now can turn an apartment into a condo or something like that. I think you could utilize those occurrences to not only require that if you're going to improve something for your own benefit, you certainly can improve to the benefits of the surrounding properties your water treatment that was overlooked 20 or 30 years ago. I think that was what I thought you were getting to. I now understand you're only looking purely at the impervious square postage stamp. But I think you could look further to bring other projects into compliance that badly need to be. MR. WILEY: Again, what we're looking at is wanting to go the direction that you are saying. But understanding these are interim regulations, we felt like perhaps that should be addressed as watershed management plans are being developed over the next few years, which will also be done by 2010. If you want to tighten it up, I'm in agreement with that. But we were trying to avoid coming on as though we're very onerous, knowing those are interim, while the watershed management plan goes through the process to analyze specifically what are the problems Page 96 ,.."'1' , .f'" '1 j r'--~I ;, :1'1 -J W ~~ ilj II ""~ -' . 1l " t' ,;r'i! '!J November 28,2007 and come up with specific solutions. That's just why we were saying it this way. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's fair enough, Mr. Wiley, I would have to agree with you then. And to that aspect, I think you're certainly, this redevelopment definition needs to get cleaned up and focused. And that's the key to this whole thing now. So I would suggest that based on the input you've gotten from us today, you rework that redevelopment definition and come back with it as precise as it needs to be for your interim period. We made a couple suggested changes to C on Page 18. And I think if you come back with those, we would be ready to finalize our recommendations on this. But I think that needs to be done first. Does anybody else have a different thought on this? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Okay, Mr. Wiley? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Mark, before that, a point of information. Shouldn't everything -- like, let me ask, for example, let's say that we approved it today and then the DSAC changed the wording. Would that be proper in the process? MS. FABACHER: We would have to bring back the changes that DSAC made to you. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. So obviously we would have to wait anyway, then, if they're going to work on it some more. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I don't think we have to wait for them, but I think that they can't put something through without us. I think it's a different direction. MR. KLATZKOW: You're the last stop on the train route to the board. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So if we had approved it today-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ifwe had approved it today we could approve it today and it doesn't have to go back to DSAC. DSAC's an advisory board to everyone, and we can take their input and utilize it if Page 97 ,~ A I ~lvember ft, 2007 we want to or we can still make recommendations of our own. Are there any other flood -- Mr. Wiley's issues? MS. FABACHER: Not on this one. He has a couple other amendments. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We're going to those next. MS. F ABACHER: Okay, sure thing. The next amendment we will look at is on Page 9i in your book. It's Areas of Special Flood Hazard. And that would be Section 3.02.03 and Section 3.02.05, Basis for Establishing the Areas of Special Flood Hazard. This is really a housekeeping issue. The flood insurance rate -- new flood insurance rate maps have been issued, and we're just updating the code. Could have said, as amended, but actually we only get these things every five to 10 years, so we're referencing the new firms. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody have any questions? Page 91 through Page 93. (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Is there a recommendation for approval of Section 3.02.03 and 3.02.05 as submitted? COMMISSIONER CARON: Move to approve. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made by Commissioner Caron, seconded by -- COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: (Indicating.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti. Any further discussion? All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Page 98 16 Lov~mbe~8, 2007 Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries. MS. F ABACHER: Thank you. The last one for Mr. Wiley would be on Page 141 in your book, Drainage Facility Level of Service. And let me give you the section number on that. That's going to be Section 6.02.01 and Section 6.02.04 generally. And this is the Drainage Facility Level of Service Requirements. And I'm going to let Mr. Wiley explain this one to you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Before you do, you had just referenced two sections. The section on Page 141, we have 6.02.00. Is there another section involved? MS. FABACHER: Well, actually, that is just a title. That's not being impacted whatsoever. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, when we make our motion, and Ms. Student in the past in the old, prior LDC meetings, has said that we need to reference the LDC section to which the motion applies, so I've been trying to be careful to do that. So that's why I caught your notation. So if we reference 6.02.00, will that be adequate? MS. FABACHER: We've advertised it as 6.02.01 and 6.02.02. If we need to advertise it another way in the future, please advise. It's just -- we don't have to -- you can just scratch through the 6.02.00. We were just trying to be more specific in our advertising. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And I'm trying to be very specific in our motions because we don't want any mistakes -- MS. FABACHER: Okay, well, strike through that whole line then. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MS. F ABACHER: Forget it's there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Before Mr. Wiley goes into a dissertation on this issue, these are strictly corrections, typographical Page 99 16JA 1.1 , November 28, 2007 errors in the LDC. I don't know if we need a lot of discussion, unless a member of this panel has a question. Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: We reference quite often LOS in here. Is that an acronym that's up in the front? It's not bolded. MS. F ABACHER: I'm pretty sure -- we don't bold the acronyms, just the definitions. I'm pretty sure it's level of service. Everybody uses it. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I know what it means. And Robert, the use of the word capital, what is that for, just out of -- I think I know the definition of the various uses of the word capital. MR. WILEY: You have two different types of funding within the county: You have capital funding, you have operation and maintenance funding related to the facilities. So that capital facility is referencing an existing facility in the ground because it is meeting the threshold of valuation, things of that nature. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Good enough. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any other questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Hearing none, is there a motion to recommend approval of6.02.01 and 6.02.02? COMMISSIONER CARON: Motion to approve. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: (Indicating.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron actually stated a motion, Mr. Vigliotti raised his hand. So let's do Ms. Caron as the motion maker and Mr. Vigliotti seconded. Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All those in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye. Page 100 161 )j , ,q. November 28, 2007 COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries. Mr. Wiley, thank you very much, sir. We'll see you for that one remaining one next time around. MR. WILEY: Yes, sir. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. MS. F ABACHER: And commissioners, I'd like to say that LOS, the abbreviation, is in the front of the code. Okay, we're going to switch gears now from engineering aspects to the environmental aspects. I would like to look at protected vegetation, the amendment for the eagle's nest. It's on Page 7 in your book. It is -- for the record, it is Section 3.05.05, Criteria for Removal of Protected Vegetation. Steven Lenberger with the Environmental Services Department is here for any questions, discussion. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Hi, Steve. MR. LENBERGER: Good afternoon. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I tell you, I attended an HOA meeting where Steve made a presentation on the exotic and overused -- let's see, undesirable plants in Collier County. I'll tell you, you'd be amazed at the amount of information that this man has and what I learned at that meeting. There's a lot more plants out there that we don't want that I ever knew. So I went out and pulled all my flowers out. But he did a good job. It was a very, very interesting meeting. Now, this issue starts on Page 7, and this was the result of direction from a couple of boards regarding -- if you recall an eagle's nest that was torn down in a dead tree in Pine Ridge, I believe, a few Page 10 1 r'6' A~"4 November 28,2007 months back. Steve. MR. LENBERGER: Yes, a few months back. For the record, Steven Lenberger, Environmental and Engineering Services. Yes, the tree was cut down. I believe it was a living tree, though, for this particular one. Authorization -- the homeowners went to the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and asked their permission to have the tree removed. And they received authorization via e-mail from those agencies allowing them to do so. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, are there any questions from the planning commission? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I always do. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Steve, on Page 12, P, there's nothing really concerned about the wording, just the method of wording. Is the intent that all those paragraphs apply? Essentially if the first thing applies, then you're subject to the next paragraph. And my concern is just the way it's worded, it may end up where somebody could break the link, and that's not the intent. The intent is to achieve all of those things, correct? MR. LENBERGER: They're all different criteria which would apply. And they're all applicable. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So in the first case that -- let me just see. MR. LENBERGER: The first one, removal -- prohibit in preserves, is that the one you're referring to? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Somebody gets the permit in the first paragraph, correct? MR. LENBERGER: Right, that's correct. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. Then we go on. Then he's subject to the following criteria only ifhe gets that permit. Page 102 16/ November 28, 2007 MR. LENBERGER: That's correct. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. And then that might be working. MR. LENBERGER: If it's in a preserve, it's prohibited, except if it's a threat to human safety. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So without the permit, nothing below that applies. MR. LENBERGER: That's right. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The fourth paragraph down, this only -- the only concern is if it's the principal structure cannot be constructed. In other words, so essentially all attachments to that are -- would allow the tree to be removed, but accessory structures would not, meaning a structure that's probably in most zoning 20 feet away. Is that right? MR. LEN BERGER: The third criteria, that's the cavities located on a parcel in which the single-family lots have been subdivided. Is that the one you're referring to? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Correct. In such a manner that the principal structure cannot be constructed. What kind of criteria do you go through for that. Because obviously, based on design you could work around a tree, but -- so what happens there? I mean, is this -- if the thing is within the setbacks, or how do you determine that? MR. LENBERGER: We haven't set the specific criteria. We would obviously look at the setback requirements. There's obviously flexibility there as far as the design of the house. We were trying to constrain that. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Because obviously this would happen prior to the construction ofthe house. In other words, there's a lot of options there. The way somebody would prove that to you is prove that it was within the setbacks of a principal structure. Page 103 '" , 'lI'? It! b Nove~b~; 28,2007 MR. LENBERGER: And it was necessary to build the principal structure. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Based on his current design. MR. LENBERGER: That's correct. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And then the last thing, you exclude the bald eagles in the last paragraph. MR. LENBERGER: That's correct. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Is that because they're covered carefully somewhere else, or -- removal of vegetation with a nest or cavity of a protected listed -- other than a bald eagle where the nest of cavity is located -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Better talk a little slower there, Brad. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay, I'm sorry. What I was doing was just reading that section. I'll do it again. It says, removal of the vegetation with a nest or cavity of a protected or listed species other than the bald eagle where the nest or cavity is located. In other words, again, I do have concern with -- and Jeff, maybe it's -- is the way this paragraph is going down, because everything is kind of linked in logic as and, and, and. And there's not the typical comma and or something at the end of each paragraph. But are you saying that this would not apply if it's a bald eagle? MR. LENBERGER: That's correct. The eagle nest would be protected. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Meaning that you could take it down for any species if you go through the process, but you can't take it down if it's a bald eagle. MR. LENBERGER: That's correct. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The scary thing is maybe, you know, when I was reading this over, I got the impression that if it was a bald eagle, you didn't have to go into this phrase and you could take it Page 104 ,.,:0:""', 1~ A 4 November 28, 2007 down. I mean, that's -- what keeps you from doing that, something someplace else? MR. LENBERGER: I didn't quite get what you were saying, could you repeat that. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So it says the removal of vegetation other than a bald -- okay, so in other words, no way can a bald eagle nest -- MR. LENBERGER: That's correct. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: All right. I think I got that. MR. LENBERGER: We believe that was the direction given to us by the advisory boards. If we misinterpreted that, please let us know. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Hi. Page 10, at the top. Recognizing Mark's pulling his flowers out because he recognized some things, but Joe Doakes goes and buys a plot of land or buys a house, actually, that's there, and wants to do some things. How are they made aware that for instance, ground cover may have a listed species? What do we do to help them? Or do we do anything or put it entirely on their responsibility to do that? Did you understand my question? MR. LENBERGER: Yes. No, I understand. It would be their responsibility. Generally the species would be pretty obvious as far as larger animals, bald eagles, red-cockaded woodpeckers. But I understand where you're going. Yes, it would be their responsibility. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: It says ground cover. MR. LENBERGER: Right, I understand. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I don't know what species may be associated with ground cover. I know we have turtles that we're concerned about. I don't know -- that's below ground, certainly. MR. LENBERGER: That's true. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I'm just wondering. I have no Page 105 161j~ l~ November 28, 2007 problem with making it stringent enough so that we properly keep people from doing the wrong thing, but I just wonder if we don't have some vines out there tripping people into bad situations. And we require of them to be fully knowledgeable. We don't lend them a hand m any way. MR. LENBERGER: That's correct. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay, thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Was there a specific species that you were interested in that regard? MR. LENBERGER: No, I don't think the ground cover would matter if it was there or not. We could strike that. COMMISSIONER CARON: I'm thinking that Mr. Murray has a point. lfthere's not something specific that we're concerned about, I don't know that there's a need to include it. MR. LENBERGER: I agree. We could remove it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What would you remove then? MR. LENBERGER: The ground cover. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Just the word ground cover? MR. LENBERGER: Right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is that it, Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I had a question, and it would involve this definition first. The second line after the parenthetical. It says that has a nest or a cavity of a federal, state or county-protected listed speCIes. My concern is that you could go out and clear a tract of land or you could go out and cut a tree down. You may not know there's any species in there until it hits the ground and then flies out you see it there. Do we need to insert the word known, that has a known nest or cavity of a -- I guess not a known cavity, but something to the fact that Page 106 N~~:Ler 18~ iit7 it doesn't penalize people for something they couldn't have known? MR. LENBERGER: Bald eagle nests, we know where they all are. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I know, but this is applying to more than that. MR. LENBERGER: I know, that's what I'm trying to say. We don't know where all the red-cockaded woodpecker cavity trees are. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. MR. LENBERGER: And Big Cypress fox squirrels, they could change their nest locations. We have no way of tracking that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But if someone were to inadvertently destroy one of those wooded plants that had a red-cockaded woodpecker or a fox squirrel might have been living in it, and it's discovered by a passerby like this eagle's nest coming down was afterwards and saying, oh, my God, look what you did, then a person comes around and gets nailed for $35,000. Well, I think the fine is 35,000. MR. LENBERGER: That was for the eagle. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh, for the eagle. Okay, $5,000. Well, I don't know if that's really fair. In fact, I don't think it is. I'm wondering how we could address that. Do you have any suggestions or any ideas? MR. LENBERGER: Did you want to limit this to certain protected species? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, no. I think all species that are protected are covered by it. But I'm wondering, how do we -- don't we mean known nests or known cavity trees being utilized by these protected species? MR. LENBERGER: We would have no way of tracking that, that would be the problem. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, that part of it concerns me. And then if you think about that and then go to P where it says Page 107 Jr ./ ' {. ,', ..'. " ,/ ,. , ~ \ ,," ", ~ November 28, 2007 removal of -- and you get into a restatement of the definition, maybe you could say removal of protected vegetation, when permits from Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation are provided. Now, if you think about that and you go back to that definition of vegetation protected and we want to figure out whether they're known or not, maybe that's where we bring in that part of the definition of vegetated protection is when permits from Florida Fish and Wildlife Service are required. Because they would only be required when that vegetation was an endangered species or a threatened species habitat, would they not? I'm trying to weave the two together so that we're not nailing someone for an honest not being able to know something was there. And I can tell you, these cabbage palms and things, you could knock a cabbage palm down, and once it hits the ground all kinds of things would could come out of there and you wouldn't know they were up there in the meantime. And I wouldn't want to see someone have to pay $5,000 for a $75 cabbage tree because they didn't know something was in there they should have been worried about. MR. LENBERGER: I think the main species are going to be the three that I already mentioned. And they're generally fairly obvious to recognize. But no, we would have no way of being able to track that. Just no way. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, maybe we ought to put this back to where it started out to be, which was bald eagle protection, and not necessarily go into the others that are already covered by federal and state species. Ms. Caron. COMMISSIONER CARON: And/or if it's three specific species that we should be concerned about, then maybe we just list those three and not worry about anything else. I mean, that's pretty simple. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think this broadens it too much. I don't think it needs to be without the evidence that we have a situation that Page 108 _ r 16 I ~ l~ November 28, 2007 someone was destroying something intentionally. That's a big difference. And also, for the -- my other concern, and I'll finish up on my questions here, is the $35,000. I mean, that's pretty steep. What is the federal penalties for bald eagles? MR. LENBERGER: 35,000 was on the draft Bald Eagle Management Plan, that was the fine. Actually, it was a recommended donation if you were to get a permit to remove a bald eagle nest. So that's where staff started from. The 5,000 number came through our Land Development Code. We looked at the fines that we have currently in place, and the maximum fine we have, if you potentially could impact a sea turtle nest, would be 5,000. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I personally think 35 is a little extreme. MR. LENBERGER: I look for your direction, if you want to change that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think all of them ought to be 5,000 if that's the maximum we currently have. I don't know why we'd want to go above it. Ms. Fabacher. MS. F ABACHER: For the record, Catherine Fabacher. I think that it would be worth it to a developer to pay $5,000 to take out an eagle's nest. I don't think that would do what you wanted to do. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, then, why don't we make it 500,000 then. Really, you're talking billion dollar developments in here. If you want to worry about that, let's make it half a million. That's as unreasonable as 35, as far as I'm concerned. I think the philosophy you're saying is more -- you've got federal and state laws that would kick in that would have a much wider and larger impact on a developer than a county ordinance. MS. F ABACHER: But they didn't. That's the problem. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, this was a single-family home and it Page 109 '" A b Nov~mter 28,' 21)07 was based on -- and you're telling me you want a single-family home person to be nailed for $35,000? This isn't a big developer that was doing that. This was a homeowner. And they were wrong in doing it. MS. F ABACHER: I understand your concern. My only point was is, to a larger developer $5,000 would be worth it to get rid of the eagle's nest. That was my only comment. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't think the Stock Development got away with 5,000 or $35,000. And I think the feds adequately took care of that. Mr. Schmitt? MR. SCHMITT: Can I make a recommendation that we not put any fine in here at all, given your concerns? And they're certainly valid. I would say this would proceed through any type of enforcement through federal enforcement. It will go to the Code Enforcement Board if it's a code action and let them assess the fine. So there would be some language that we would put in here that would describe that the fine or any adjudication will be processed or be any -- prosecution, it will be prosecuted through normal channels, I guess. I'm looking at the county attorney. MR. KLA TZKOW: I do think you have to list some fine, whether it's $500 or whatever you deem is appropriate. It you take this to Code Enforcement Board, they usually looking at continuing fines for, you know, take care of this for $50 a day and we'll give you 90 days to do it. This isn't something they'd really look at. MR. SCHMITT: But the state has -- we would -- anything like this we normally turn over to the state first and they prosecute. The issue here was that the state didn't pursue the last case. It was just merely -- I guess I'm -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I think we ought to leave-- MR. SCHMITT: Ms. Caron, you remember, just pretty much Page 110 16/A 4, November 28, 2007 they shrugged their shoulders and said oh, gee. COMMISSIONER CARON: Right. And I think as far as fines are concerned, it's not to be able to charge these fines, it's to prevent people from taking actions that would cause them to have to pay these fines. If you put a significant fine up there, then people will look and say, oh, wait a minute, I'd better follow the rules and I'd better do things the right way. And that's the only point. The point is not to charge people $35,000, it's to prevent people from taking actions that we don't want them to take. So -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Fabacher. MS. F ABACHER: I was going to suggest some language. Perhaps we could may be fined up to 35,000. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Jeff? MR. KLATZKOW: I'm trying to remember. I think on code enforcement, $5,000 is the limit that you can do for typical code enforcement finding. If you just follow that track, just make it $5,000 and we're done. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: To be safe, I think that would be a good direction to go in. MR. KLATZKOW: Yeah, I could double check the maximum, but I think it's 5,000. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I had spoke to the Conservancy about it, and their issue was not to fine money either. So I don't see why 5,000 wouldn't work across the board. I think, Steve, this has got to come back. I think you need to refine the language to the species you're talking about. I would suggest if you're going to use a definition, then use it, and in P, you don't need to redefine it there. As we mentioned. Reduce -- change the fine references and I think we'll be pretty close to -- and Brad. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I still-- and this is P, I mean, 1 Page III 1( ! A 4 November 28,2007 would be -- and just maybe Jeff, you could look at it. But if the first paragraph, the second paragraph, you had parentheses one, parentheses two for the one after that, then I think that would be in a more understandable code. Because you're saying the following criteria. And then let me just go back to what would be parentheses four, the last paragraph. Is that where you tell everybody that they can't cut down a bald eagle nest? Because the concern I have is you have a sentence and then you exclude the bald eagle nests and then you have other criteria. I think somebody could prudently interpret that that the bald eagle doesn't have to meet that criteria. But it doesn't say you can't cut it down yet. And if the intent of this is to not cut down bald eagle nests, why doesn't you just say you can't cut down bald eagle nests. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Wait a minute, our code would be way too short. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And I think this is the -- I mean, prior to this you could cut down a bald eagle nest in a residential single- family property, correct? MR. LENBERGER: That's correct. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And this is the thing that stops you from doing that. So I think Jeff, am I wrong on four, the way -- MR. KLA TZKOW: No, you're absolutely -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: -- the way it's written there -- MR. KLA TZKOW: You're looking for clarity in the code, which is unique, quite frankly. I think it's a great idea. And if, quite frankly, all we want to do is protect the bald eagle and nothing else, we could reduce this to -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: One word, couple words -- MR. KLATZKOW: This whole thing to just a paragraph and you're done. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think we need to look at hanging it up, Page 112 ool'Y..>t>l 16""'" ^, .',1' " " November 28, 2007 so -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I honestly think the way four is written, 1 could argue that I can cut down a bald eagle nest that has nothing to do with the principal building. You've excluded bald eagle nests from the principal building requirement. When you talked to me prior to that, you were saying that was the meat ofthe whole thing, that's where you say you can't cut down a bald eagle nest. And that's not what it's saying. Thank you, I'm done, Mark, thanks. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I fully agree with you, Brad. So maybe Steve, you can come back -- when you come back to us, we can get some of this refined down to a lot less verbiage. MR. KLA TZKOW: Just for direction, because there's been a lot of direction on the board, are we looking to limit this to just the bald eagle or are we looking at this for all protected species? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It started out with the bald eagle, and it seems that Steve had mentioned a couple of other species. But I would, since those haven't been issues and we have other management plans and species ordinance, rather than get into those, I'm not sure what they take. It was real clear, a bald eagle's nest is monitored, they're everywhere, everybody knows where they're at. I suggest for clarity, why don't we just leave it for now to the bald eagle, and if we have to add others later, we look at doing that. Does that -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I'm in favor ofthat. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And then the code can say you can't cut down a bald eagle nest. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. It's very simple, we've got a shorter, healthy -- MR. KLATZKOW: And if you do, it's a $5,000 fine. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Right. Done. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: There you go. So Steve, with that, we Page 113 -".~ ';0", jt~; 4' J;""\~1j un. November 28, 2007 just saved you a lot of time. MR. LENBERGER: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, sir. I know we're going to stay here till 1 :00, and that's only about an hour away, but I think we'll give the court reporter another break until 12:10, which is seven minutes, so that will help. (A break was taken.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Welcome back. We'll resume the meeting of the Land Development Code, Cycle 2. We're going to be out of here, I've now been told, at five minutes to 1 :00. We will stop -- MR. SCHMITT: We need to get out of here by 1 :00, so -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We'll make sure we're out-- MR. SCHMITT: Five or ten minutes to so we can clean up our areas and move out. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Catherine, what's next on the list? MS. F ABACHER: Next on the list is going to be Steve Lenberger again, and we're looking at the preservation standards priorities on Page 95 in your book. That is going to be Section 3.05.07.A.3. And this is an EAR-based amendment where the DCA asked the environmental and engineering services department to rearrange the priorities. As soon as Steve gets back, I think he'll be able to answer any questions you have on it. But it's really not very much of an issue. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The underlined on Page 96, that's most of what we're -- this is all about, right? MS. F ABACHER: Right, exactly. They're just changing the priorities in order, the different order of the priorities. Here he is. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any questions from the planning commission? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I do. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray. Page 114 16i A 4 November 28, 2007 COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Oh, you're there, okay. Page 96, first item on A. Wetland or upland areas known to be utilized by listed species or that serve as known corridors? Or do you want corridors, because it's a discovery, oh, there's a corridor. MR. LENBERGER: We would use technical assistance from the agencies as far as the corridors are concerned for listed species. So we would have to rely on their technical assistance. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay. Then on new F, formerly H, all other native habitats. Does that include that ground cover again? MR. LENBERGER: All native habitats, yes. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay. Well, I'm still not clear on that A section of where you have to be dependent upon them. So in other words, they determine what the corridors are? MR. LENBERGER: That's correct. The compo plan requires staff to -- they get technical assistance from the state and federal wildlife agencies regarding listed species. We would rely on them for this -- determining this. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So if you have been depending upon them to do that, provide that information for you, somewhere, someplace in your organization you have maps, I presume, where you've patterned in all these corridors. You don't ask them each time to tell you the same corridors, right? MR. LENBERGER: We have on the GIS data system information regarding panthers telemetry, also even black bear. And so we know pretty much the areas they're inhabiting. And you can pretty much see corridors for these larger ranging animals. And when they re-did the comprehensive plan, they took that into effect. Other species, it would be -- we don't have that information. We don't have a layer identifying these corridors. They would have to be determined on a case-by-case basis, and we would have to rely on the wildlife agencies for their expertise to determine that. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So it is possible that over a Page 115 'i 'P'q 4) " ; ,r, iI't;/ B, - 'oj /. '1 :!)J. November 28, 2007' period of time you might be asking those organizations for the information on something you already had, been made known to you. You might be asking for the same thing again, am I right? MR. LENBERGER: It is a possibility -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Or does it change so much? MR. LENBERGER: We have products that may be in a particular area and there may be quite a lapse of time before another product would come in the same area. So the staff there may not be knowledgeable on what previous technical assistance has been issued. But then, again, the technical assistance could change, too, depending on what data the wildlife agencies have acquired since then. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I think I understand your circumstance. And I was just thinking the resource of something that you retained, that you had to access would certainly be your first effort. Notwithstanding the fact that you may have a policy that requires you to go to the other people. But I thought that then they became known corridors. But you're saying that there really are no known corridors, they vary all the time. Is that right? MR. LENBERGER: I wouldn't say they vary, but they're not known. We only know from telemetry points where they occur for larger ranging animals such as panther. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So I suppose, just to continue but for the last statement, suppose it's possible at one point in time the absence of telemetry would allow somebody to do something on that property that six months later they would be precluded from doing. Is that theoretically possible? MR. LENBERGER: The presence of a telemetry point for a panther on-site wouldn't necessarily prohibit development. They're looking at the overall picture as far as the panther movement. And the federal government requires compensation mitigation for impacts to Page 116 IIlll" A ._, I' I.t . November 28, 2007 panther habitat. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay, I appreciate what you're doing. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Steve, when you go in for your corridors, they would be the most recent ones based on deaths and births of the various species that have to create the corridors in the first place? So it will be changing. You can't get something today, lock it in and say this is a wildlife corridor, because next week or the month later when the new eggs hatch or whatever happens, you may not have the same corridor needed by the same species. So they will be variable, and they will be fluctuating and they will be responsive based on the time you asked for them from the agencies, I would assume. MR. LENBERGER: That could be based on a variety of factors too, habitat quality, changes over time, development. There's a lot of things that could affect that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Mr. Midney? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, it seems like what you've done is you've moved E and F up above Band C, or C and D. Can you explain why you did that? MR. LENBERGER: For the types of habitats, xeric scrub, dune, strand and hardwood hammocks are very limited in the county. And they wanted to afford them more protection. That's why they were moved up in the selection criteria. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: And for A, you're focusing on corridors for the movement of wildlife. It would seem that C, the WRAP score or the uniform wetland -- whatever that is -- wetland mitigation assessment score, those are -- seem like they would be more easily quantified by a biologist going in than trying to determine where the corridors for the movement of wildlife are, since it's hard to see them, they probably mostly move at night. Page 11 7 n NoveJ~28, 2007 !)$~ MR. LENBERGER: It would depend on the listed species involved. But like I said, we would use technical assistance, and this is what was adopted in the comprehensive plan as the selection criteria. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Do you think that the WRAP is more objective or more easy to measure than trying to figure out where the corridors of wildlife are? MR. LENBERGER: I can't answer that question. You can figure out the functionality on a WRAP score or UWMAM. Movement of wildlife, I don't have the expertise. And you can't necessarily just pinpoint that, you'd have to rely on the agencies. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: It would seem to me that you could quantify the WRAP easier because you can actually ground truth it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney, unfortunately, and I don't mean to interrupt, but I wanted to point out to you, we've already discussed and accepted all this in the CCME. We have to change the code to correspond to the CCME, we don't have a choice in the order. So just in case you're trying to get the order changed, 1 don't think we can do that here today without going back and changing the CCME. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: No, I was just trying to understand the rationale. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other questions? Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: No, that was my comment. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Hearing none, are we ready for a motion on Section 3.05.07? COMMISSIONER CARON: Motion to approve. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: I'll second it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney seconded it, Ms. Caron made the motion. Any discussion? Page 118 -..... 41 761 '~,: '" ,~ ,~ .II ,~ November 28, 2007 All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. MS. FABACHER: All righty, commissioners, we have one last topic for environmental area, and that would be marinas on Page 99 in your book. Two pages on, and that is Section 5.05.0 2.G. And by way of introduction, this was a BCC-directed, directed to exclude the shoreline within conservation easement areas for use in the calculation of maximum number of wet slips in accordance with the Manatee Protection Plan. You'll see that obviously the EAC agreed with it and the DSAC did not. But anyway, if you have any questions, Steve can answer them. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any questions on this? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'll ask one. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And I honestly don't really believe this, but one of the things we've done in fair play is allowed people if they're going to conserve land to use that for density and things. Is there a reason why we wouldn't keep that fair play going here? And Donna has an answer for me, I think. COMMISSIONER CARON: Yes, I do. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm sure there are probably -- a lot of Page 119 T, g I A.. ~ 'At. November 28, 2007 people might have answers for you on that one. Go ahead. COMMISSIONER CARON: First of all, I would venture to say that in 99.9.99999 percent of the time no one grants a conservation easement without getting something for it to begin with, and/or have it to offer it as mitigation for something else that they're getting. What this does is prevent double dipping and being able to use these conservation easements for more than one thing. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. A concern off of that, though. Would somebody ever start designing their conservation easements away from the water to prevent losing the shoreline, at least this calculation of shoreline? COMMISSIONER CARON: That's up to us. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What I think you're trying to say is if you had a shoreline as defined here, and you wanted to utilize it for something to calculate boat slips with, could you come back in and stop your conservation easement one or two feet short of the shoreline and have a strip that you could then use to calculate lineal footage for boat slips? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: That's even cleverer than what I was Imagmmg. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: That's what I thought you were . .. Imagmmg. MS. FABACHER: I think that's the intent of this amendment, to prevent that -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right, that's what I'm getting at-- MS. F ABACHER: Oh, okay, thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- and that's what I was trying to get-- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But didn't you describe a situation where the conservation easement wasn't at the shoreline. In other words, let's say the guy pulled it back such a way that the easement was off the shoreline. Page 120 1161l " November 28, 2007 Anyway, I'm going to vote in favor of it, I just wanted to throw out the fair play question, that's all. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think they could probably try to argue that the conservation easement may not go to the shoreline, but I'm not sure how they'd get away with that because from the shoreline down it would be considered like jurisdictional. So how could you get away from doing that if it's part of the shoreline. That's probably why this helps define it. So are there any other comments on this particular issue? COMMISSIONER CARON: Motion to approve. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion to approve. And that is LDC Section 5.05.02. Is there a second? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: I'll second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney seconded. Motion is made by Commissioner Caron. Any discussion? All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Any opposed. (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries. MS. F ABACHER: Thank you, commissioners. Thank you, Steven. We'll see you back on the 12th. Okay, I'd like to continue, since I'm the only one left, to do the ones that I have some knowledge of. First one we'll go to is on Page 107 in your book. This is going to be Section 5.06.05, X and Y. You've seen this before. I hope it looks Page 121 'f A J. cJ" ' ' 'f. November 28, 2007 familiar to you. We passed it in the last cycle. But unfortunately, when we went to write the ordinance, we noted that we had not advertised properly. So we're simply bringing it back, properly advertised this time. If you have any questions, I'd be happy to answer them. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, we unanimously recommended approval last time. I hope we haven't changed our position on there. Hearing no comments, is there a motion to reapprove recommendations for 3.05.10.A.6, 30.05.04.G. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'll do it, Mark. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Pardon me? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well, Paul and I are fighting over who gets to do it. Paul can have it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You're going to recommend deny or approve, Paul? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Approve, please. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made by Commissioner Midney, second by Commissioner Schiffer. Is that an affirmative, Brad? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Any discussion? All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries. MS. F ABACHER: Thank you, commissioners. Now, if we can Page 122 'f ;/ ,<. " ,; November 28, 2007 move to Page 73. And this is going to be for Section 1.08.02. A little bit of background. I had read this definition for a long time and one day said well, this doesn't make any sense. So I tried to correct it. You'll see that on the fourth line it talks about -- it says neither or both of the previous separate nonconforming lots. It's hard to understand, but the way I read it, I thought it should be either. But I have had discussions with former county attorney office staff that wrote it. And they said if I take out the neither, then I turn the definition around 180 degrees. But I just perhaps need some direction on this one. 1 had said that we -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Have you been running into problems with it as left as it was -- MS. F ABACHER: No. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- because it seems like it provides a better opportunity left as it was, because then you've got neither or both, so you -- would mean you could go either direction with it. Whereas if you change it to either or both, you may be limiting yourself to half. I read it too. I was confused by why it was being changed. I didn't know if it was needed. I thought there may be some reason behind it. MS. FABACHER: No, if you're in agreement with it. I just have trouble understanding the definition altogether, but -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Did you ask the tax assessor's office if there was a problem with it, since it involves them? MS. F ABACHER: No. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And if they've not complained, maybe we ought to leave well enough alone. I think it might be more confusing to change it than just to leave it. MS. FABACHER: Okay. Well, I talked to the former staff and I will talk to the assessor's office and ask them. Page 123 161 J(1 ..~ ,./"~ A '. "';;1' .;' "'; November 28, 2007 COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Mark? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes, sir, Mr. Murray. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Is there an issue that should apply here for the word adjacent versus abutting? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, lot splits, they're probably going to be always side by side. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Abutting, right? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Where it's adjacent here, two or more adjacent, legal nonconforming lots. Adjacent as I understand it was where something is in between, like a road. MS. F ABACHER: That's a very good catch. I saw that myself. But unfortunately we hadn't vetted that out. Perhaps the solution might be when we have the LDC reviewed by the consultant that's going to come in, that we ask him to look at this definition. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That would probably be a better idea. MS. FABACHER: Okay. Then we'll just -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Until now then, we'll put abutting? MS. FABACHER: We'll just leave it as it is. We'll just -- I think that's the direction I got, unless it's something else. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I just brought it up. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think that Mr. Murray's comment, though, ought to be brought up to that consultant as well. MS. FABACHER: Absolutely, I agree. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That would be a better way to handle this one. MS. F ABACHER: No, I agree with what Mr. Murray says, too. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So on 73, we're -- Page, 73, which is we're just recommending not to change it. Page 124 16'/ A h . November 28, 2007 MR. KLATZKOW: Withdraw. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Withdraw. MS. FABACHER: We'll withdraw, okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Do you need a formal motion on that? MR. KLATZKOW: Yeah, that would be easier. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. This is Section 1.08.02, Definitions. We're looking for a formal motion to withdraw. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I'll make the motion. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Made by Mr. Murray, seconded by-- COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- Mr. Midney. All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries. MS. FABACHER: Thank you. The next one we will do is to expand the definition ofTDR credit. That's going to be on Page 75, and that will be Section -- for the record, that will be in the definition section 1.08.02. And I think it was just a -- it's just a clarification. Page 75. It just references you to the exact section that talks about TDRs in the code itself, instead of -- before it was just 2.03.07, which you know is an immense section that has all the overlays and all the zoning districts. So this just puts you to your correct subsection. Otherwise you could hunt for hours looking for a TDR. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Catherine, after the word unit, it says a Page 125 o - .., ,_. '<, November 28, 2007 unit representing the right to. And I'm not sure in all cases it will represent the right to if they're trying to apply in a manner that's inconsistent with its use. And I'm wondering, maybe we could say a unit that may be used to increase the density or intensity of a development -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Or a unit representing the opportunity. Well, whatever. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Either way. MS. FABACHER: We could -- perhaps we should maybe hold this one until Joe Thompson comes, because he has a bunch on the next meeting, on the TDR program. So perhaps we can discuss that with him. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, I have no problem with that-- MS. F ABACHER: Because he's the TDR expert. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Put it off till the 12th then. MS. FABACHER: I'm going to move to Page 89. And this is going to be Section 2.03.08, Rural Fringe Zoning Districts. And it's simply removing a duplication in the text. Same phrase appears twice. You can see on Page 90, facilities for the collection transfer. It's just in there twice. So we remove that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any discussion from the planning commission? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I make amotion. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made by Commissioner Murray to recommend approval ofLDC Sections 2.03.08.A.3.A, paren 3.H, and 2.03.08 paren three, paren one. Is there a second? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: I'll second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Seconded by Mr. Midney. Any discussion? All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. Page 126 16 I j:j r t November 28, 2007 COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed. (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries. Next one, Ms. Fabacher. MS. FABACHER: Well, I think we could go back. I don't have the staff here, but there's some pretty simple ones. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Boy, are you an optimist. MS. FABACHER: Well, I'm looking at Page 1, which is Section 1.08.02, Definitions Development Order. And it's from the compo planning department. And they're requesting that we add SRA into the definition, Stewardship Receiving Area. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Any questions from the planning commission? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Move to approve. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. Mr. Schiffer. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The concept of a development order, does that trigger anything, I mean, an impact fee due or anything like that? When you called changing something into a stewardship receiving area, would that trigger anything that we're not predicting here? MR. KLATZKOW: I've got to tell you, the establishment ofa stewardship receiving area in my mind is a development order anyway. I don't think we're adding anything here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Just clarifying, possibly. MR. KLATZKOW: We're just clarifying. In my mind, it is. It does have ramifications. MS. F ABACHER: I think in general they're trying to. It's like in Page 127 ,... A L~ November 28, 2007 f c.'l,-, a variation of a PUD. And it's not really addressed. And I think there's some other amendments later on that -- next cycle that we'll be pulling that into monitoring programs and so forth. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: My only concern was are we -- is there an unpredictable trigger that we're pulling here. I'm fine, let's go ahead. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other questions from the planning commission? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, hearing none, is there a recommendation to approve LDC Section 1.08.02? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I had made the recommendation. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Mr. Murray's made the recommendation. Is there a second? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: (Indicating.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney seconded. Any discussion? All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries. Next one. MS. F ABACHER: All right. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Pick an easy one. MS. F ABACHER: I'm just personally going through the book to see what we haven't covered here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Fabacher, while you're doing that, I Page 128 16 I ,/, ,(~t November 28, 2007 note, before I forget, we're scheduled for the 12th in this room. Would you see ifthere's any openings for any other night or afternoon for this room, or even morning for that matter, either three hours or four hours, to schedule a follow-up meeting in case we can't finish that evenmg. MS. F ABACHER: Okay, I sure will. Actually, I don't think there are anymore amendments that I would want to discuss without staff. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: How about-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Mr. Klatzkow's document? MS. F ABACHER: Well, we can discuss it, if you want to discuss it. We were planning to discuss that all at one time with -- it's on Page 59. We were going to discuss that at the same time with the other amendments that are kind of trailing along with it. But we can absolutely go to that discussion. So we are looking at Section 10.02.03 on Page 59 in your book, Submittal Requirements for Site Development Plans. I think you all are pretty familiar with this one. MR. KLA TZKOW: And my recommendation, quite frankly, would be that E be put into the noise ordinance, not in the LDC. But I wanted to do it this approach, because I wanted your input on this. And you wouldn't normally see an amendment to the noise ordinance. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer had first call, then Mr. Murray. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: A concern I had is that since our next meeting is in the evening, and since this doesn't address what to do with existing problems, I was just wondering, maybe it would be healthier to do it in the evening. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think that would be more fair. Then we can at least say we've aired it as much as we can in the public. Why don't we try that. Page 129 _~ ,.;.c.., IT ,;J... ., i'!4 ~.. ..~ t' ~ 8.f November 28, 2007 I know there was an attorney, wasn't it Clay Brooker who was -- or somebody was in the audience. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Chris -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well, Clay was in-- MR. KLATZKOW: Well, Clay represents Pebblebrook and Stevie Tomatoes, so -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. As a courtesy, since we do know that there's someone interested in this, couldn't we at least notify them that we will be hearing this then on the 12th, and that way they have the opportunity if they want to be to participate. Having that said, is there any others that we can do today or we rather defer till the 12th? MS. F ABACHER: I'd rather wait till the 12th. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: If doing so, it's important that we look for alternative back-up dates to the 12th as well. MS. FABACHER: Understood. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Klatzkow, did you want to say something? MR. KLA TZKOW: No, sir. MS. FABACHER: We're going to -- to get your direction, we're going to continue this hearing to December -- I'm sorry, November 12th at 5:05 p.m. in this chamber. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, we're going to -- I'm looking for a motion to continue this meeting to December 12th at 5:05 in these chambers. MS. F ABACHER: Okay, thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is there such a motion? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Moved. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: (Indicating.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray, seconded had by Mr. Vigliotti. All in favor, signify by saying aye. Page 130 f' i A b November 28, 2007 COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries. And we are done until then. Thank you. ***** There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 12:35 p.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION J;\J:CtAk (l ~k,)~ MA "P. STRA , Chairman These minutes approved by the Board on \ - II - 0 <i( as presented v/ or as corrected , TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC. BY CHERIE' NOTTINGHAM. Page 131 R'-'''',.-'. !1=D """6 fA 4 \C'..c'Li\ '.., ~ J l F t ;100B December 6, 2007 '.\();3I,:i ~;f (-'Ui.,'J~!V '>Y!~i':<'\<::joners TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THEQit -if COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMlMlSSI . " - /';',J _ N 1 Fl 'd Ha\::lS .," ap es,. on a He~nlllg December 6,2007 Coyle. e.... ' <:::oletta ----- LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 8:30 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Mark Strain Lindy Adelstein Donna Reed-Caron Tor Kolflat (Excused) Paul Midney Bob Murray Brad Schiffer Robert Vigliotti (Excused) ALSO PRESENT: Jeffrey Klatzkow, Chief Asst. County Attorney Marjorie Student-Stirling, Assistant County Attorney Joseph Schmitt, CDES Director ,11.P I A Ii Ray Bellows, Zoning & Land Developmenrlltg~~w Date !tem#: Page 1 Copies to lb I A , 4 December 6, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good morning, everyone. Welcome to the December 6th meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission. If you'll all please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. (Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) Item #2 ROLL CALL CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, will the secretary please take the roll call. COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Kolflat is absent. Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'm here. COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Midney? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Here. COMMISSIONER CARON: Ms. Caron is here. Mr. Strain? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Here. COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Adelstein? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Here. COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Here. COMMISSIONER CARON: And Mr. Vigliotti is absent. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, Mr. Kolflat and Mr. Vigliotti both notified me, they have personal things they had to take care of today, so they won't be here. They are excused absences. Item #3 ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA We'll move on to the addenda to the agenda. And I want to Page 2 16 I A ,f , December 6~007 remind everyone that next Wednesday night at 5 :05 we have an LDC continuing meeting from our last time on the LDC Cycle 2. Is everybody here planning to be there next Wednesday night? Anybody knowing they're not going to be? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: (Indicating.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney, you're not going to be? I know that the others, Mr. Vigliotti and Mr. Kolflat, I think, indicated they previously would be here, so we'll have a quorum. The following morning on the 13th at 8:30 this panel was requested to review a settlement agreement on the Bert Harris claim for Cocohatchee. So that meeting will start at 8:30. It will not go past 1 :00 for sure, but more than likely noon, because this meeting room is taken up at 1 :00 by other groups. So for scheduling purposes I want to let you all know. Anybody here not going to be at the meeting next Thursday at 8:30? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good, we'll have a quorum that day. Now, on the 14th we have an option. The 12th, on the LDC meeting -- I would hope we could finish the LDC issues up on the 12th. Ifwe can't, this room is available -- the only other day it's available is the 14th for the month of December, and I believe it was like at 1 :00 in the afternoon. I'm hoping we wouldn't need it, but we may need it as a clean-up day. Ifwe can't do it on the 14th of December, we'd have to finish the LDC cycle sometime in January, which keeps pushing it behind schedule. It should have been done earlier this year, to be honest with you. I'd like to ask, if we have to go to the 14th, does anybody here know they cannot make it on the 14th? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I will not be able. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You cannot be here? So there's a Page 3 1 ~eLm1er 6~007 potential we could have it. And the other option is, depending on what our 20th agenda is like and how much of the LDC cycle we'd have to continue, we might consider doing it late on the 20th. Although I'm not sure, because of the time frames and the schedule on the 20th at this point. At this point I'll ask staffto reserve the 14th meeting room, pending confirmation of a quorum on the 12th. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: At what date and time? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: 1 :00 in the afternoon. Yeah, it would be an afternoon meeting. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay, glad I heard that. Item #4 PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, planning commission absences. We just went over that. I asked -- staff asked to discuss with us a potential meeting date in December of 2008. They're planning ahead. So we stuck it under this particular item, because it seemed the most convenient to be done. Is planning staff here? Yes. MR. STANDRIDGE: Good morning, Commissioners, Noah Standridge for the record. I'm a Senior Planner in Comprehensive Planning and currently shepherding the rural land stewardship five area reVIew. We anticipate that process to be finishing up in October or November of next year and we would like and ask to come before you on one of two dates, December 1 st or December 15th, to give a presentation on the outcome of that process, and also to review the information and recommendations of that committee. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are you asking these dates because Page 4 "II'h , ," ~ '/ .. i.' d~U 1 .t December 6, 007 those are the only days in December this room is open? MR. STANDRIDGE: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The reason -- both of those are a Monday. And they're both a Monday prior to a Thursday regular meeting of ours. Generally the weekends prior to our Thursday meetings we try to prep for those Thursday meetings. I know you're going to be presenting us with a review of the RLSA or the Eastern Lands Study Committee. I can personally tell you I have multiple pages of corrections I believe that the program may need. And I think just getting through those is going to be a lengthy process, plus the study to understand those issues before the Monday meeting will take time. I don't know how much data your group plans to give us. I would assume they're going to be looking at the program in depth, because there are a lot of issues there. MR. STANDRIDGE: Well, we are not planning on reevaluating the entire program. This is a, may I say, tweaking of the program, looking at areas that can be strengthened. But currently as it exists the committee is looking to see if it has been successful in its implementation to meet the four goals outlined in the Growth Management Plan. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are you also looking to see if it's overly successful? MR. STANDRIDGE: Overly successful? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. MR. STANDRIDGE: Of course. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Being that it's on a Monday, is there any other -- are your committee's findings not going to be available till what month, November, December? MR. STANDRIDGE: I plan on finalizing two reports, one that will be the technical review, the status to date of the program, with numbers and acreages of how much landowner participation has Page 5 16:"""'.'.71 " ii, (j December 6, 2007 occurred. That report will be finalized in March and April and will be coming before you in April during your regular hearing meetings to present that information. Following that, there will be a second report which will come before you December 1st. That will be finalized October or November of2008. And that information can be made available to you well before your regular -- the hearing dates that we're requesting. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, based on that, if the committee agrees, I think the December 1 st date might be better for us, because if we could get the information early, we'd have from November 20th, which is our third Thursday meeting in November, all the way to that first Monday of December to at least have the paperwork and fit it in. That's more time frame for us. Does that work for everybody? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Good sense. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let's shoot for December 1st then. MR. STANDRIDGE: Thank you very much, Commissioners. COMMISSIONER MURRA Y: December 1 st? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: December 1 st. Well, we'll probably start at 8:30 in the morning. Item #5 APPROVAL OF MINUTES - OCTOBER 15,2007, AUIR MEETING; OCTOBER 16,2007, AUIR MEETING; OCTOBER 18, 2007, REGULAR MEETING: OCTOBER 18,2007, LDC MEETING Okay, approval of minutes. We have four sets of minutes that came with this package. The first one is October 15th and it's the AUIR meeting. Is there a recommendation for approval? Commissioner Adelstein, you're usually willing to do that. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: (Indicating.) Page 6 16/ 14 4 December 6, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Commissioner Adelstein made the motion. Seconded by? COMMISSIONER CARON: I'll second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Commissioner Caron. All those in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries. The next one is October 16th, again the AUIR meeting. Motion to approve made by? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: (Indicating.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Commissioner Adelstein. Seconded by? COMMISSIONER CARON: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Commissioner Caron. Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All those in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? Page 7 .; f:J" I, . . /.1 di, " H Ls Decembed5, 2007 (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries. October 18th is our regular meeting. Is there a motion to approve? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: So moved. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Commissioner Adelstein again. COMMISSIONER CARON: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Commissioner Caron again. All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. The last one is October 18th. Motion to approve? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: So moved. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein, followed by? COMMISSIONER CARON: (Indicating.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Commissioner Caron. All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries. I guess it goes to show you how well the minutes are taken by our court recorder that we don't have corrections to them, because she Page 8 16 Lecibe!t, 2007 does a good job. So thank you, Cherie'. Item #6 BCC REPORT - RECAPS BCC report, Ray? MR. BELLOWS: Yes, the Board of County Commissioners met on November 27th and they heard the conditional use for the model-- American Dream Builders model home. The Board of County Commissioners approved that 5-0. They also approved the PUD rezone for Gaspar Station. That was approved 5-0. And on the summary extension they approved the PUD extension for Sierra Meadows and the parking exemption for the Naples Big Cypress Marketplace. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ray, when these approvals happen, would it be possible to add to your report whether or not they accepted our recommendations and things like that? Only because if there are recommendations that we make that they don't like, it would be good to know perception-wise where they're seeing those as they review them. MR. BELLOWS: Sure, I think that's not going to be a problem. On the American Dream Builders model home, I do have a note here that the Board of County Commissioners did direct staff to bring back a GMP and LDC amendment to address the model homes in the Golden Gate Estates pursuant to your recommendation about model homes along 951. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, I hope that they understood that that particular model home didn't have any neighborhood complaints. There was a lot of particulars with that effort that were more in line with community standards than some of the others that Page 9 i1 f. A ",-to . l~ ~ December '6, 2007 have tried to come before us and get approval. MR. BELLOWS: Yeah, and it's just going to be -- staffwill bring back recommendations. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Would staff have the stakeholders involved in that process, meaning I hope you would at least -- there's one or two civic groups in the Estates that participated heavily in the model homes, the Oakes advisory group being one and the Golden Gate Civic Association being the other. It certainly would be good to have their input on that GMP amendment since they're the ones that helped develop the original Growth Management Plan language. MR. BELLOWS: Yeah, I'm sure that will be the case. I'm not going to speak for comprehensive planning, but for the Land Development Code we definitely will get those -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The GMP is the issue. MR. BELLOWS: Yes. Well, I will relay that information to them. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, Ray. Chairman's report. I think I've said enough. Item #8A PETITION: PUDZ-2003-AR-360L NEW HOPE MINISTRIES Advertised public hearings. We'll go straight into our hearings at this point. There was a change in the schedule, you all should have a revised two schedule. The boat dock was moved to the last position and the first two positions were moved -- last two were moved forward to accommodate some issues that we had to have for scheduling of others, staff. The Petition PUDZ-2003-AR-3601, New Hope Ministries, represented by Tim Hancock, will be the first item up today. Page 10 161 A 4 December 6, 2007 And all those wishing to testify on behalf of this petition, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (All speakers were duly sworn.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there disclosures on the part of the planning commission? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I had communication with Mr. Hancock regarding some additional data needed for the transportation documentation that was supplied to us. I also talked with Nick about it, and he will be discussing my concerns here today. So with that, let's move forward. Mr. Hancock. MR. HANCOCK: Good morning, Mr. Chairman, remaining members of the planning commission this morning. Also with us today is -- I'm sorry, for the record, Tim Hancock with Davidson Engineering. With us today with New Hope Ministries is Pastor Grant Thigpen, also Mr. Pete Smith. Part of our project team here this morning, Mr. Gavin Gillette, who is here to address any concerns with water management design. Mr. Andrew Roth, also with Davidson Engineering, to discuss any elements of the traffic impact statement, and Mr. Jeremy Sterk, also with Davidson Engineering, to answer any questions you may have on the environmental aspects of this petition. By way of overview, the proposed project combines two parcels totaling 39.89 acres, which consist of the existing church site as you can see on the visualizer, which is the gray rectangle on the right of the two. That site is nearly 21 acres and immediately -- lies immediately east of the Neapolitan Park PUD, which is the gray rectangle on the left of the two. And that project is 18.99 acres. The proposed rezone seeks to simply expand the existing church facility and uses to include the Neapolitan Park PUD parcel. That parcel's currently zoned for mixed use and allows for up to 150,000 square feet of office, up to 38,125 square feet of additional Page 11 1 .., ~61 i; 4' December 6, 2007 commercial, and 81 multi-family units. While I think it's well understood that even a large church will produce fewer daily peak hour trips on the local roads than a 19-acre commercial and residential mixed use project, as Mr. Strain pointed out in a conversation we had, that analysis was not specifically included in your packet and available for your review. To that end, what I'd like to provide you for your consideration on that aspect is that our traffic impact statement treated the project as if the current land were unzoned. In other words, we're starting from scratch, and here's what our added trips would be based on the expansion of the facility. And so everything you see in your TIS is based on that premise. However, when you compare what's in the TIS against the table before you, what we did is we took the existing uses in the Neapolitan Park PUD and we placed them into a table using the most constrained movement, as your transportation staff requires, which is typically your p.m. peak hour movement. To that end, by way of comparison, the 19 acres of the Neapolitan Park PUD at build-out would produce 412 p.m. peak hour trips. We also in this number did account for what would normally be a pass-by reduction, as well as an internal capture. So we -- that number's already been lowered by using those two tools. So it's not a worst case scenario, it's something your transportation staff -- very similar to what they would see if you were to submit a TIS for the project under its current land uses. This 412 p.m. peak hour trips compares very favorably to a weekday p.m. peak hour trip generation contained in your TIS of 93 trips for the church. Again, an apples to apples comparison of 93 p.m. peak hour weekday trips to 412 p.m. peak hour trips under the current zoned land uses. We all recognize that churches don't put most of their traffic out there between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. The church J, A 4 December 6, 2007 will have a significant amount of traffic for a short period, particularly on Sundays, but measures such as traffic control being provided by the church through the Florida Highway Patrol has been in place and will continue to be in place into the future to address Sunday morning flows. The project as proposed will generate fewer trips during those weekday peak hours on the adjacent roadways and achieve dispersion through providing access to and through the adjacent Dolphin Plaza project, which is currently under SDP review by Collier County. Because the county aerials were flown in January, and the Dolphin Plaza project, which is on top of this aerial, the cleared area there, with the exception of the gas station on the corner, was cleared subsequent to that, the church went for an afternoon flight and took these pictures. What you see here at the bottom of the picture is the existing New Hope campus. That large rectangular squared area is the existing campus. To the upper portion of the photograph moving to the west is the Neapolitan Park PUD, which is the wooded section, which is -- again, it goes from front to back, left to right. The existing wooded section behind the church is a part of their current campus. As you go again to the north, what you have is the Dolphin Plaza. The Dolphin Plaza has an existing developed gas station at the corner there of Santa Barbara and Davis. What the church has proposed and what is currently under SDP review by Collier County is an interconnection from the northwest, or as you look at it the upper right wooded section there, an interconnection between our project and the Dolphin Plaza project. That same connection is evident on the site development plans that have been submitted to Collier County for Dolphin Plaza. We've also provided staff with a copy of a letter [rom Dolphin Plaza agreeing to continue to work with the church to ensure that Page 13 1 6 I At ~" t December 63007 interconnection occurs. More importantly, your staffhas got us both at SDP and we're not going to exit that particular process without making that interconnection happen, neither one of us. So the project, from a traffic dispersal pattern, will not just put its traffic onto Davis Boulevard as it does today, but will have use of Santa Barbara through the Dolphin Plaza project. So the project will be accessing two major arterial roadways. We believe the staff report correctly addresses issues of compatibility and consistency with applicable sections of the Land Development Code and the Growth Management Plan, with one exception, which I expect will be the focus of much of our discussion today, and that centers around water management and preserves. Mr. Chairman, I've briefly hit on some traffic issues, which you've raised in a conversation with me. Is it your pleasure to address the transportation issues now and then focus on what I believe is the one remaining issue, or go ahead and complete the presentation and address all at the end? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think you ought to -- Tim, there's a lot more than traffic as far as clarification goes. And normally, if you'll complete your presentation, we'll just start with the questioning and work our way through. Maybe what the best thing we could do is save transportation to last so Nick can then come up and address all that collectively. MR. HANCOCK: Yes, sir. We'll proceed. The staff recommendation of approval includes a stipulation that stormwater management not be allowed in preserves for this project. The basis for this, as stated in your staff report, is that the environmental staff is of the opinion that the project is not consistent with Policy 6.1.1, paren (5)(b), which states the receipt of treated stormwater discharge or such use, including conveyance, treatment and discharge structures, does not result in adverse impacts to the Page 14 161 Ai'4- December 6, 2007 naturally occurring native vegetation to include the loss of the minimum required vegetation and the harm to any listed species according to the policies associated with Objective 7.1 as determined by criteria set forth in Land Development Code regulations. Discharge to preserve having wetlands requires treatment that will meet water quality standards as set forth in Chapter 63-302 F AC, and will conform to the water quality criteria requirements set forth by the South Florida Water Management District. In short, it's kind of a do-no-harm statement. If you're going to put stormwater management in the preserves, staff wants to be comfortable that such use of those preserves will not adversely affect the native vegetation. The difficulty comes in when you look at that statement, there's a line that says as determined by criteria set forth in the Land Development regulations. I think this body is all too aware that the last attempt to actually create a change in the Land Development regulations that addresses this issue specifically resulted in no action by the board. The EAC was on one path and I believe this body had their recommendations, and the BCC determined that it needed either more study or more time. And so nothing was implemented in the Land Development Code as a benchmark, if you will, that a project would have to meet in order for this standard to clearly be shown than it's met. The basis in the staff report really has three elements to it for their recommendations: Number one is the staffs opinion that directing stormwater to be retained in the proposed upland preserves will disrupt the natural hydroperiod balance. Number two, that the proposed preserve is mostly underlain by well-drained, non hydric soils. And three, that directing stormwater runoff to the proposed upland preserves can result in changes to the nutrient and sediment Page 15 16'" A'" b ';" ," ~'i" ecember 6, 2007 loads. Through the course of this application, which as you know from the AR number has been going on for some time, we've provided the staff with a variety of reports and analysis. The first thing we were asked to do is a Harper analysis. A Harper analysis is when you're impacting five or more acres of wetlands, the District typically will request one, and the county staff has come now to request one whether the District wants it or not. The focus of a Harper analysis is to address if the project's water management design will adequately reduce the nutrient loading from development so that the post-development nutrient-loading discharge or the discharge from the project has a lesser degree or an equal degree of nutrient loading as predevelopment. We did that analysis. We provided it. We answered some questions. In the end the Harper analysis was accepted and the project water management design will achieve that objective. The downstream nutrient loading will not be worse post-development than it is predevelopment. We were then asked to calculate what kind of storm event it would take for water even to enter the preserves. Let me explain the stormwater management design as simply as I can. There is an area of dry detention that all the stormwater goes into. That dry detention achieves the pretreatment of that storm water, per Water Management District standards. That water then enters a lake on the property. The purpose ofthe lake primarily, it does provide additional treatment, but it primarily provides for quantity or storage. When that lake rises to a certain level during peak events, the water will seep back into the existing preserves, and then as the water levels fall that water will seep back toward the lake and eventually discharge from the site. And the term that Mr. Lorenz coined was pop off. When do we get to that point that water pops off into that Page 16 161 A 4 December 6, 2007 preserve? The water, other than the ground water elevation itself, will rise and move into the preserve. We looked at that, we modeled the system. And what we came up with is if you have a four-inch rainfall in 24 hours, the system will allow water to basically seep back into the preserves. Over the course of 12 years of data there were only a handful of times you had four inches of rain in a 24-hour period. We submitted that information. What we got back was, well, okay, that's not a lot, but what about successive events? What about in a typical year, what if you have one amount of rainfall one day and two more days of two or three or four inches on those days, what happens then? We went back and basically pulled 12 years of rainfall data. We analyzed the 12 years, determined what we thought was the year just above the median. In other words, an average rainfall year, let's take that next year up and let's model a 30-day window, the wettest month of that year. We started at control elevation, which means our control, which is 9.5, is almost like a glass table in the wet season. When you pour water on it it's going to do one of two things: It's going to run off or it's going to stack up. So assuming we started at wet season water table, which is the average high, we modeled 30 days. We took the rainfall events, real time rainfall events and plugged them into the system day after day after day after day for 30 days. And what we were able to show is, in that 30-day window the system achieved full recovery, which means that -- full recovery is defined by when you have a major event, a 25-year storm event, over the course of 15 days the system fully recovers. In other words, the water elevation is back down at that 9.5 control. There were no successive events that allowed water to stage in the preserves to any great degree. And more importantly, throughout Page 17 ~! , d!i.'- '41 15'" '" I: , :r,' It" r. 'j t, 1 ~,,' I!l,. i l.J , December 6, 2007 that 30 days, the majority of those days water was not even in the preserves. Our control elevation for this site is 9.5 feet. Our natural grade is between 10 and 10-and-a-half. You'd have to have the water table elevated six inches or more over the seasonal high to even have water in your preserves. We provided that information to staff. And before the EAC, the staff looked at that average year, and Mr. Lorenz testified that there appeared to be in a given year only eight or nine times in which water would enter the preserves. Over the course ofthose 12 years, there were single events in the number of 15 to 20 that may have allowed it to happen. We felt that information was pretty good. It spoke well of the design. It spoke of the fact that any water being put back in the preserves was short term, short duration, and minimal effect. The EAC agreed with us and recommended approval 5-1. I'll be candid, though, one of their elements of recommendation was gee, you haven't given these guys a standard. Every time you ask them to model something and they do, you ask for more modeling. Well, that wasn't the end of it. The staff asked for modeling, and we provided it. We modeled in addition to the 25-year, three-day event which we had already provided, we provided the requested 10-year event and the five-year event. The result of that additional modeling was the same recommendation. And folks, I think what we're dealing with is not -- we don't want to become the test case. But we have become the de facto test case for water management in preserves. Is there a level at which it's acceptable? We don't have that mark. We believe we've met it. We believe through proper design our water is pre-treated in dry pretreatment to a commercial -- exceeding a commercial standard before it ever goes into our lake. Then it sits in the lake, receives additional pretreatment before it ever discharges into the preserve. Page 18 JIIfI' A 16/ 4" December 6, 2007 And it only discharges in the preserve in peak events for short durations. The fact that our EIS states that an increased hydroperiod will be beneficial to the preserves, we still have a recommendation of denial -- I'm sorry, recommendation of approval with a stipulation that we cannot discharge into the preserves. I believe what we have is a philosophical issue, not an issue based on analysis. That's difficult for me to stand here and deal with. But let me boil it down to what I think is the actual question we need to answer with respect to this project. It is my sincere hope this body hopefully takes one of two actions today. The one is to approve staff recommendation with the stipulation. That's obviously our second choice, that we not discharge into the preserves. The second is to approve the project or recommend approval with the fact that the project has shown as designed that it does not represent adverse impacts to the preserve. To that end, you're looking at two options. We've given you the information on option one, and let me try and make it as simple as I can. The way we've designed the system, that preserve is connected to our water management system. And the staff sees that as a negative because it allows for water to build up in the stormwater system and move back into the preserves. We candidly think the opposite is true. If we disconnect that system from the water management system, if we leave that preserve as it is today, we all know the first thing we do when we build in Southwest Florida is we elevate the site. Preserves end up being encased, if you will, in two to three feet of fill. That preserve will become a bathtub with no outlet. Peak rainfall events as a result will stand in that preserve and they will stage not higher but longer. The only benchmark we've been given is a study by Mike Duever with the South Florida Water Management District. And I'm Page 19 161 A 4- December 6, 2007 sure staffwill share that study with you. We're dealing with what's called a mesic flatwoods. And in Mike's report, he says mesic flatwoods, which are one step away from a hydric flatwood, can accept inundation on average for up to two inches over a 30-day period. None of our models show that this system will be inundated for greater than 30 days for more than two inches. I spoke with Mike last week and he went a half step further. That model is not intended to be a snapshot in time but over a six to 10-year window. We believe we have shown that not only do we have a good design, but if you take Mike Duever's report, where the idea is if you get over two inches of staging in that area for 30 days or more, you begin to transition from mesic flatwoods to hydric. Our system does not do that. The model shows that's not what will happen. We've met the only standard we've been given. And I think the alternative is to create a bathtub around the preserve which will actually cause longer inundation. So my request to you is we're not asking you to set policy, but I do want you to take a look at the aerial in front of you, and right where my pen points, you'll see a strip of green. I know it's difficult to see on this aerial, but I want to point out that we have a case study of exactly what we're asking you to approve. It's on-site. Ten years ago this project was approved by the South Florida Water Management District. At that time churches were not held to a commercial standard. Water did not have to be pre-treated prior to discharging into preserves. Our existing storm water management system takes the church and the parking lot and discharges the water through sheet flow into an existing preserve, which is mesic pine flatwoods. For nine years this has been going on. We're happy to put lengthy testimony on, but we don't think it's necessary. That area is doing well. There's a very simple, and I know, Mr. Strain, you've seen Page 20 16-' ,~ , n " "."( December 6, 2007 this, if you go out to cattle lands where you get a lot of standing water over time, the saw palmetto will get what we call leggy . All of a sudden the branches on the bottom will die off and it almost looks like it's trying to step out ofthe water. You'd think after nine years some of that might be going on if this was being transitioned from mesic to hydric. That's not evident in any way. Admittedly, there are three or four pine trees in here that are stressed. I can take you out to the middle of the Picayune State Forest and show you three or four pine trees that are stressed too. There's no indication -- if everything was being stressed due to water or inundation, we would see a broader application of that. My point is that we've done all the studies. We've met or tried to meet what standards we've been provided in the Mike Duever report. And we have on this very site a case of a higher degree of inundation going into a preserve than what we are proposing on the new preserve in the year. Folks, we've met the standard. And our request of you today is, assuming we meet the standards in all other areas that -- on this particular issue that on this project you determine that in fact what we're proposing does not represent adverse harm to the preserve. With that, and that being the key issue, if you have any specific questions about water management design or the health of the system out there, Jeremy Sterk, who's the environmentalist with our firm, is here. His -- Dan Underhill did the EIS in your package. Jeremy's experience with the site actually pre-dates Dan a little bit. He can address any questions you might have. I've chosen just to focus our presentation on the one key issue of the stipulation, but at this point obviously we'd be pleased to address any questions or concerns you might have about the balance of the project. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Questions from the planning commission? Page 21 16'1 j~ h , December 6, 2007 I would like if we could hold our transportation questions collectively towards the end and we'll have Nick address all those at one time. At least I have some, so I'll hold mine. Mr. Midney? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, the way I read the staff recommendation is not that the area be made into a bathtub and completely isolated, they're just talking about full water quality pretreatment before it would backflow into the preserve. Are you against -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Paul, that's the wrong -- there's been a new recommendation issued separately by staff. That was their first recommendation. If you don't have the second one -- here, I'll give it to you to read. MR. HANCOCK: The recommendation you have in your packet we were fine with, and quite frankly was a little confused when we got it because didn't match the analysis or the statements in the staff report. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right after our packet went out, I think it was after the weekend even, a separate recommendation went forth, and not all of us who get e-mail on a regular basis may have received it. And that's why Mr. Midney may not have had it. MR. HANCOCK: Actually, Mr. Midney, if you want to go back to the previous recommendation, we're all for it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That was going to be my question. The previous recommendation seemed to make sense, especially in lieu of all the studies that you've done and the fact that you're in an activity center in an urban area, I was surprised to receive the second recommendation. But we'll go from there. Mr. Midney, did you want to follow up with that at all? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: No. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any other questions? Mr. Murray, then Mr. Schiffer after Mr. Murray. Page 22 16lA 4 December 6,2007 COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Good morning. I'm looking at the PUD that's extant. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray, could you bring the microphone. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I'm looking at the section one statement of compliance, and No.8. I just want to make sure I understand what there are no conflicts. No.8 reads, the planned unit development includes extensive open spaces which are preserved -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Bob, I'm sorry -- we'd like to follow along with you. The statement of compliance in the PUD? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yeah, in the old PUD. This is the Neapolitan Park planned unit. January, 1990. My apologies. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We were looking at the new one. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I apologize. And I'm on page -- I guess it's 424. Section one. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. MR. HANCOCK: Yes, sir, I'm with you now. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I just want to be clear that we don't have a conflict in any way. Under No.8, the planned unit development includes extensive open spaces which are preserved from future development in order to enhance their natural functions and to serve as a project amenity. It's that's a statement that's -- although it's intended to be specific, I think it's more general than I'd like it relative to what you're currently relating. Because I'm trying to differentiate, do we lose any of these open spaces as a result of this new program? MR. HANCOCK: To answer that question, I'll refer you to the next to last page of Ordinance 90-06, that same document you're looking at, which is the conceptual PUD master plan for the Neapolitan Park PUD. And if you take a look at what -- it's a little tough to see because it's obviously a scanned -- but if you'll note the size ofthe preserve. Page 23 Ii.. 1 f~1 " LtJi t~ 4 December 6, 2007 COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I just want to get there, if you give me a second. MR. HANCOCK: And the pages are numbered by OR book to 37, then Page 444, then it's the very next page. COMMISSIONER MURRA Y: Well, I just lost my page. Anyway, go ahead, sir. MR. HANCOCK: If you look at the PUD master plan, obviously compliance statement No.8 is intended to work in concert with the master plan. The proposed native vegetation that will be retained in the project exceeds -- if you'll notice that area of preserve on that master plan? COMMISSIONER MURRAY : Yes. Well, I'm not sure I can differentiate -- it's Tract B, I guess, that we're looking at? MR. HANCOCK: Correct, it's -- COMMISSIONER MURRA Y: One looks like a lake and the other one might be the -- or are they both preserves? MR. HANCOCK: No, one is a lake, which provides water management, the darker of the two. The lighter color is a preserve. Again, my pen is pointing to the preserve area. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: This needs to be turned on. I have to look over here. I'll look over here in the meantime. It's as simple as that, huh. Thank you. MR. HANCOCK: So the preserve area within the Neapolitan Park PUD shown on the master plan is actually smaller than what will be retained on-site through the existing combined PUD. Furthermore, what was required on the previous conditional use for the New Hope Ministry site has been increased because the regulation of the native vegetation requirement since the original adoption of the conditional use requires more. And the fact that they left the area to the rear vegetated, it increased our overall. So when you combine the two projects as currently approved, the resulting vegetation is more than what those two projects would Page 24 16 A 4! December 6, 2007 have had to have done under the current approvals. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: That's interesting. Could you return to that other photo where you had your pen. While I was appreciating what you were trying to show us, you showed us what appeared to be a rather small line of vegetation. MR. HANCOCK: And I was incorrect. And thank you for catching me on that. The wider area, which the pen now -- let me get out of that glare. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: That's a little different. MR. HANCOCK: Yeah, that looks more like a preserve and less like a landscape buffer. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yeah. Now it makes a little bit more sense to me. And the -- how wide would you say that is? That looks, I would guess, maybe 35, 40 feet? MR. HANCOCK: It's actually closer to about 70 feet in width. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: You say there are only a couple of pines that are stressed? MR. HANCOCK: There are about 70 pines total in that area, and there are three or four of them in one small cluster that appear to be stressed, based on site visits to the site and whatnot. It's not unusual when one tree gets stressed that you get some boring insects that will spread out to a couple around it. So it's not terribly disconcerting, but it does not appear to be anything related to hydrology. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay. Let's see if I have anything else that's pertinent. MR. HANCOCK: I do have people far more qualified than I to make those statements. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Bear with me a second. If! have anything else that's consequential -- yeah, I have this one I noted, too. There's a reference in here and I have to find it. It talked -- here. Well, there's a reference to a 5.12 and there isn't any 5.1 -- Page 8 of the new Page 25 ~. 161 December 6, 2007 planned unit development, the new PUD. Under B, item two. At least it's not contained in this document that I could find. MR. HANCOCK: It should read 5.10. When sections were eliminated from the PUD during the course of review, we failed to catch that -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So that's just a scriveners or a typo? MR. HANCOCK: That is my fault. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: And I think -- yeah, my note was a concern I had under Page 4 was internal flooding. I was concerned with the berm actually creating an internal flooding problem. And not in the truest sense of flooding, but containment of water that probably was more -- where are you going to put your water? If you berm it in, what are you going to do? MR. HANCOCK: Well, the only berming on-site for water management areas is going to occur, it's not even going to look like a berm, it's in essence going to be -- you'll see a flat grass area for parking and then it will drop off into a dry detention area and that water is moved through dry detention ultimately back to the lake in the rear and then it is brought through a system of pipes and swales back to the front of the property and the ultimate discharge being a control structure next to the right-of-way on Davis Boulevard. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Well, thank you, sir. Those were my issues and questions on this for the PUD, thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let the record show Mr. Vigliotti is here. And Bob, for your reference, we're on the New Hope Ministries, and we're just now starting the questions after the presentation. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Thank you. Sorry I'm late, everyone. MR. HANCOCK: You didn't miss any of the fireworks, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer, you were next, then Mr. Page 26 1 [~em1er 6~007 Adelstein. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And my question, I think, is use of the site and the site planning. What is the educational building? What is the intent of that? MR. HANCOCK: It's really a general purpose building, Sunday school classes and so forth. It's education in association with the church programs and membership. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Is there a day care on this grounds? MR. HANCOCK: No, we do not have day care. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The question is why do you have that building up front like that? Why wouldn't you push it to the back? You have a nice axial drive on the future sanctuary. This thing is going to block that. MR. HANCOCK: That particular building, as you see on the PUD master plan what we did is we treated everything at a full build-out. That particular building doesn't have a set of architectural plans in the wings waiting to move forward. And what we're currently proposing, that's in the subsequent phase. So the likelihood that that building is going to be exactly as shown, exactly where shown is questionable. One of the things that you do try and do, though, is that there are times in which the sanctuary is in use and you have educational uses that are running concurrent. And I think what it does allow is it allows you to come onto the campus and access the educational facility without mixing your parking for those that may be using the sanctuary . Can it be moved to the back and be aesthetically nicer or whatnot? It's possible. But I can tell you that this plan was derived from thinking ofa couple of years back, and that building may move in the future. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And the last question, is all this Page 27 '/flit A ,i 1""1 ',I;';' -L \-D~cember 6, 2007 parking intended to be paved? MR. HANCOCK: It is our goal to have as much grass parking on the site as possible. I've had discussions with Nicole Ryan at the Conservancy, because they just recently ran into the same problem with their site. It's gotten to the point even for churches, you want to do grass parking but it accounts towards your water management almost as if it were paved. You get very, very little credit for grass parking because you have to have stabilized subgrade and limerock under it. So I've expressed to the Conservancy our desire to work with them, particular in dealing with not-for-profits in a way to maybe, maybe improve that, where the required subgrade is not as high so you get a greater infiltration and you get credit to water management so we can encourage more grass parking. Our goal is to have as much grass parking on the site as possible where feasible. How's that for qualifying? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay, good. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Thank you. I have great respect for your effort. And I'm trying to decide in my own mind how much larger will this New Hope Ministry become by what we're doing? MR. HANCOCK: The proposed sanctuary here, which, due to the time and expense of this process, the church made the wise decision to put as big a number in there as they can dream. And we're talking about a 4,200-seat sanctuary is what we based all of our TIS information and whatnot on. The likelihood of getting there on this campus, you know, I don't know that ultimately all of the ancillary programs that would go with a membership that high can actually fit on this campus. But we wanted to maximize that so we didn't have to come back here in two years because we were off by a thousand. Page 28 161 A 4; December 6, 2007 COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: That is something that I really understand and respect. But my problem is, I still know Davis Boulevard and I know the problem on Davis Boulevard and I can see what could happen on some of these days in which the traffic will not be able to flow. And I'm wondering, how are you going to protect that? This is a very large street with a very small use availability. And now we're going to make this much, much larger. Davis Boulevard maybe is a failed road. There's nothing we can do about it. And all you're going to do with it now is make it fail faster and possibly put us into a major problem. MR. HANCOCK: In response to that, the failure of Davis Boulevard is a p.m. weekday peak hour failure. It's Monday through Friday, 4:00 to 6:00 is when it achieves that failed status, if you will. At build-out, based on 4,200 seats, there's 93 trips in that p.m. peak hour. The bulk of trips that will apply to this campus will occur predominantly on a Sunday morning. In the TIS provided to you, we actually went out and did traffic counts during the hours of operation of the church on Davis Boulevard. Right now traffic coming out of the church has two choices, east or west on Davis. Davis is the only way in, the only way out. With the approval of this project and the requirement of the interconnection, approximately half of our trips will now be heading to Santa Barbara. And that is going to be a tremendous benefit for Davis. And that's why I think the number of93 peak hour trips, if you begin dividing that between Santa Barbara and Davis, it becomes minuscule. Will there be some traffic congestion on Sunday mornings? Absolutely. And all of us that attend a church of any size have dealt with this. And that's why the church hires the Florida Highway Patrol to allow for safe ingress and egress of their parishioners. Page 29 i' p "--II n , ''',''I iI lif "'if ""l"Q" .,. December 6, 2007 Because this is an off-peak use, I believe, Commissioner Adelstein, that the concern over traffic on Davis, the worst thing that could happen is not rezone this to a church and allow it to become something that contributes to a higher degree of that weekday p.m. peak hour. We're off-peak. Ifwe can get more off-peak uses out there, some of those traffic numbers will look a lot better. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I'm hoping you're thinking the same way. But the idea is to make sure that it's going to be safe and usable when it's going to have to be usable. MR. HANCOCK: I think if we didn't have the access to Santa Barbara I would probably share your concerns to a greater degree -- COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I guarantee that-- MR. HANCOCK: -- but fortunately some of the folks developing the Dolphin Plaza just happen to be in the congregation on Sundays, so we've got a good neighbor there. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Thank you. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I've got one more question. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sure, go ahead, Mr. Murray. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: With regard -- if you'd show that other picture again of the -- I recognize that's the current -- when the child care, you said you had no child care, and that's fine. But within the PUD you're asking for the opportunity to provide child care. MR. HANCOCK: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So my question would be relative -- very simple thing. How close, and I can't really make it out on this master plan, to be honest with you, where would the child care be relative to those what look to be like residences there? They look like several story high residences. MR. HANCOCK: In the next phase of buildings, the only thing we're actually building in this next phase is -- back by the lake there was a building that kind of ran east-west? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Could you relate it to that so that Page 30 1 h J Jj 1. J 'I)ece~ber 6:!'20()7 I get a better orientation and I can try to then relate it to this? Okay, that far. MR. HANCOCK: That would be the next building that is firmly in the building program. Beyond that, quite honestly, we're still a little bit in the hope, dream and pray a lot phase. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay. So that's -- based on what you told me earlier is like 70 feet for the preserve area, that's got to be probably well over 150 feet. MR. HANCOCK: Yes, the master plan -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: It's very hard to read this master plan from my -- it's very -- MR. HANCOCK: You all may remember Ms. Kelly Michelle Smith, who is with our firm. A wonderful lady , but made the mistake of giving you way too much detail. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I know. MR. HANCOCK: She took the SDP plan and submitted it as our PUD master plan, and it's got way too much stuff on it. But when you look at this, one of the nice things about the identification of the preserve area is that we've been able to retain native vegetation along the perimeter of the boundary everywhere where we butt up against residential housing, with the exception of, 1 think there's one building immediately to our east that does not look at the preserve. Everybody else, we're maintaining a strip of preserve anywhere from 30 to 70 feet around that lake. Then there's a two-acre lake, then there's a building. So we feel very comfortable that folks are going to -- when it's all done and said, would everybody like 10 acres of trees behind them? Sure. But we think this plan results in the right native preservation and the right buffering for this condition. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any other questions of the applicant before we ask transportation questions? Page 31 16 I A it: December 6, 2057 Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Hancock, on Page 6 of your PUD, the new one, the current one. MR. HANCOCK: Yes, ma'am. COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay, question on 3.2(B)(2). Included here are boat docks. Why would that be? MR. HANCOCK: Well, with the exception of any type of a summer program where they might canoe in the lake, you've got me. COMMISSIONER CARON: I think we can take that out of the PUD? MR. HANCOCK: Can we live without boat docks? The kids will complain, but we'll take it out anyway. COMMISSIONER CARON: And number three -- MR. HANCOCK: And maybe later you can tell me what you were getting at, because I understand there's a story there. COMMISSIONER CARON: Number three includes a bookstore and a printing shop. So is this for commercial purposes, or is this just strictly for the church to print their Sunday morning -- MR. HANCOCK: It's to support the church use. Pastor Thigpen is on tape every Sunday, and there's a lot of recording and production that goes on and people requesting things from the church and whatnot. So one of the concerns we have is these days if you aren't so inclusive in your PUD and you ask for an interpretation from staff that it's consistent with what you have, seven months later you're in front of the county commission asking for a print shop. So it is to support the church uses, period, it is not a commercial use. COMMISSIONER CARON: On Page 9, for your preserve area plan what are the water management structures that you're talking about? MR. HANCOCK: It would strictly be related to an outfall Page 32 '1l' A 4 ~", ,j g December 6, 2007 structure. As currently designed, we don't have any structures in there, but if down the road, for example, there was a change in the design, that's what we would limit it to. COMMISSIONER CARON: Then I think it should say outfall structure. MR. HANCOCK: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: If you're going to go that far as to define the structure, you may want to make sure you put in the pipe that leads to the structure, because the foot of that may end up being into the structure, and I can see someone mincing words during review that the pipe isn't allowed but the structure is. So you might -- I think water management structures covers you because it's anything that the South Florida Water Management District basically requires to be good engineering. I'm not sure by mincing into defining each piece of a structure, if you decide to use an outfall that might vary in shape or size or use a mitered end or something like that, then you've got a different kind of structure but still one that would be reasonable. COMMISSIONER CARON: The goal was to keep them out of issues, not to create issues for them. So if everybody is happy with water management structures -- MR. HANCOCK: It's probably far more limited in actual application than you may think. There's not too much there -- COMMISSIONER CARON: That's probably the better way to go. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Could we state water management structures as required by permitting agencies? MR. HANCOCK: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Because you're not going to want to do more than that anyway, so -- MR. HANCOCK: No, sir, they're kind of expensive. COMMISSIONER CARON: And on Page 13, vacating the Page 33 ~'fj , '11 .'p " IJ.! lip' If 0'" ' . I t,( Ce"becember 6, 20af current conservation easement, is that the conservation easement in front of your property along Davis? Where is this? MR. HANCOCK: No, ma'am, that conservation easement, that preserve area will be retained along the front of the project. COMMISSIONER CARON: What is the conservation easement that you're trying to vacate? MR. HANCOCK: That vacation has already occurred. This PUD's been in process for a long time. There was a taking that occurred along Davis Boulevard for right-of-way and drainage, and there was an alteration in the location and the intended location of the preserves there. To my knowledge of the current conservation easements, we're not vacating any of them. So I believe that's holdover language. Our goal, Ms. Caron, is basically that what you see meets or exceeds the county standard, at least for preserve location and type. The environmental staff has approved it. We just simply -- we're happy to limit ourselves to what's on the master plan. That may be holdover language. COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay, I'm-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Do you have any problems striking that language then? MR. HANCOCK: I've just been informed by my client that on the east side there is a narrow strip that the county said is too narrow to be counted towards the preservation requirements that are in place today, so we may be vacating that. However, it's not going to be altered because it's really -- you know, there's drainage that goes through that area. But that may be the only area in which we vacate an easement. As you see on your master plan, though, that area is not culled out as an easement to meet the county's requirement. COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay, can you explain then exactly where that is? I mean -- Page 34 ., i ,I " /,':: ~ '~.J " .~ ~~~~. December 6, 2007 MR. HANCOCK: Going back to the over-information plan, as you look at the right side of this plan, on the bottom right corner you'll see that, you know, approximately 70-foot wide preserve area that we're talking about. And see how it kind of starts to turn up to the north on the bottom right corner there? That used to extend up on as a part of our preserve on that eastern boundary. It's pretty narrow and it's not going to be part of our preserve plan into the future. So that would be the only area that I believe that language would apply to on the current plan. Our current plan in for SDP review is really not to touch that area, but we just can't count it as preserves, so why leave a restriction on it that isn't necessary. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Could you blow that plan up and specifically show us the easement that the you're considering vacating? MR. HANCOCK: Thank you, Mr. Bellows. Again, lower right-hand corner, you see how it kind of sweeps to the north a little bit and then the parking area starts? To the right of that parking area is a narrow strip, and that was part of a conservation easement that doesn't need to be there anymore. COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay. Thank you. I'm good for my questions in here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any other questions before we go into transportation? Mr. Vigliotti? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'm sorry that I was late. You might have went over this, this morning before I got here, but where do you stand on stipulations regarding the water quality? Sorry . MR. HANCOCK: I will do my best Reader's Digest version. We've provided staff with all the information they've requested, Page 35 ., , I A ), ... 0 December6, 2007 we've done countless analyses on it, and there's not a standard that we're being told we have to meet. And so we are pre-treating all of the stormwater before it would ever enter the preserve. It will only enter the preserve on very extreme rainfall events. And my having it connected to our storm water system, we believe it will exit quicker. We think it's a better plan than leaving it alone and hemming it in with CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Tim, I think we can shorten this by what you already suggested, was that the recommendation that was originally submitted by staff that says the CPUD and master plan show full water quality pretreatment volume before the water reaches an elevation that would have the lake overflow its banks and then backflow into the natural ground area preserves. That one he can live with. The new one that came out bye-mail, I know the look on your face, so that's probably like Mr. Midney, you didn't see it. Another one came out that said all stormwater shall be prohibited from entering the preserve shown on the master plan. That one they can't live with. So they're in agreement with the first one, not in agreement with the second one. MR. HANCOCK: Thank you, Mr. Strain, and that is correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, does the backflow back into the preserve? Is that by just natural groundwater seepage or is that by some sort of plumbing, like pipes? MR. HANCOCK: No, sir, it's -- between the lake and the preserve there are no structures as a part of the water management system. It literally just rises. And because there's a berm around the lake, portion of the lake that's adjacent to the preserve, the water just basically seeps back. And as the lake level falls, the water seeps back toward the lake. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Well, if it's all subterranean, Page 36 161 r~ i~ December 6, 2007 doesn't that imply that there's not going to be any nutrients, it's just going to be the natural flow of water? MR. HANCOCK: To guarantee that there is no nutrient loading is almost an impossible task -- COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: I mean, isn't it considered that if it's subterranean that you're not talking about nutrients flowing back and forth? MR. HANCOCK: That would be correct. And again, because of the pretreatment factor, that the water's being pretreated before it gets to the lake and before it gets to the preserve, we believe the statement that nutrient loading is increased to be erroneous. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, before we get into transportation, are there any other questions of the applicant? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'm good, thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Tim, if you could, I haven't asked any questions and I do have a few. MR. HANCOCK: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let's start on Page 7, Table 1, Community Facility Development Standards. Your maximum height on that table in your PUD, your reference is 48 feet and three stories. The way we usually do it is three stories not to exceed 48 feet. Do you have any problem with the correction of that language? MR. HANCOCK: No, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Under the requirements where it says minimum building setbacks, PUD boundary, you have under accessory use a 10-foot setback. Since most of your buildings are accessory uses to the main large building, that would potentially put a huge building right next to some residential areas. Do you have any objection to a larger setback requirement along residentially-zoned properties? Page 37 161 A 1, December"!, 2007 MR. HANCOCK: I think 25 feet, same as principal, would be acceptable? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, so PUD boundary, where it abuts residential, you're saying will do -- MR. HANCOCK: A minimum of 25-foot setback, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm trying to make some of these changes on notations so we can, in our stipulated motion we can keep it nice and clean, so -- This project has the potential of a lot of uses that may have compatibility problems with adjoining residential areas. You're certainly entitled to the uses you're asking for. However, if you were, say, sold to a different church, as some churches grow out of their different areas and move on to others, and some new facility came in and decided that the uses that are in here mean something different to them, something greater than what the neighborhood or that this board or another board may have intended, we have introduced a suggestion in the code, it hasn't passed yet, but we discussed it with a couple of other PUDs last week, in implementing noncompatibility language, so that if a use is interpreted in the future by an applicant in a manner that seems to be inconsistent to what was intended, staff could request that that use be rereviewed for potential compatibility uses back before a board. I don't know if you're familiar with this language, it was introduced by Mr. Klatzkow some time ago and it's been working its way through the system. Your PUD, should it go through now and prior to that language being instituted, it would basically not fall under that language or be questionable whether it fell under it. So I have a copy of that language as it has applied in the last couple and I was wondering if you have any objection to entering some noncompatibility language into this PUD for the circumstances that I just described? MR. HANCOCK: It I could have the opportunity, as you're Page 38 16 I 4 ! December 6, 2007 discussing transportation with Mr. Casalanguida, to speak to with Mr. Klatzkow. My primary concern-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Here's a copy of it for that purpose, when you do. And then before we get to the end, I'd like to ask you your thoughts on it. What that does is prevent situations like we've had occur in a couple places in North Naples, one being, as an example, the Stevie Tomatoes in Pebble brook Plaza incident. So -- MR. HANCOCK: Understood. And because we're not a commercial site where we have somebody coming in to -- you know, that was selling property, so to speak, it's lesser of an issue for us. My concern remains, and I'll discuss this with Mr. Klatzkow, as -- you know, what constitutes a complaint? Three neighbors who don't like the church? Are we -- those type of issues. How it ferrets out is my primary concern for this particular project. But I'll discuss that with him. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We'll look forward to your comments before we finish. On Page 9, your preserve areas. Under 4.2(A)(2), biking, hiking and nature trails and boardwalks, do you have any concern if we reference those as being non-paved? MR. HANCOCK: No, sir. Your EAC LDC subcommittee also is bringing a recommendation back to you hopefully in the coming months on that same item. But no, sir, for this project pervious only would be acceptable. I assume that does not apply, obviously, to boardwalks. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Elevated non-pervious. No, I'm talking ground surfaces. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Patent it, you'll be rich for life. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: On your PUD master plan, I have two problems with the master plan. One is I do not think you really want to make this your master plan. The fact that you're putting this intensity, Page 39 1/,./ A'l b December 6, 2007 and I would have to turn to Marjorie or Jeff or whoever was the county attorney that reviewed this, this master plan is so detailed, I would be concerned that you might be back in here every year to change the movement of a parking space or the -- it's just way beyond what I think is reasonable in the public record for a master plan. It is an SDP plan, I certainly agree with you, and that's the scrutiny that this could entail going through review for one change is going to be devastating to your applicant. Ms. Student? MS. STUDENT-STIRLING: Yes, it would be our opinion that it should be more conceptual in nature. They typically are. MR. HANCOCK: With that direction, we'll be happy to modify it, leaving the uses where they are but taking the detail out of it. We didn't want to do that in the middle of the process, because we'd go through 14 reviews. But with your direction, that's only one review, so we're very happy to do that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And I think we could stipulate something that would give us enough assurance that the remaining plan, say with review by both staff and Margie, would be a plan that would be something more in line with a conceptual plan that we're used to seeing, so that we don't have an applicant forced to come back through the system every few months for a minor change. MR. HANCOCK: And preserve locations and lake locations will be unchanged in that plan, basically we're going to remove the parking detail, primarily. And if there's any water management that's in addition to this, we'll show it so it's more reflective. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, you have a set of standards in the LDC that trigger insubstantial and substantial changes. If you were to use those as a the guideline as the ones needed to be on here, and anything that doesn't require a substantial change for movement, you don't need to put it on here. So I think that would be a good way to approach it. Page 40 lISt A 4 December 6, 2007 MR. HANCOCK: We appreciate the suggestion and certainly agree to doing just that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I have -- and I should have mentioned this during disclosures, I did speak to the Conservancy, and you reminded me of that by your reference to them earlier. Their suggestion, and I happen to agree with it, is that a lot of these -- and I understand your argument about the grass parking, but grass parking, while it may not help you in water management because of the base that still has to be there, it does help in appearance, a lot of green space and reduces the heat generation from black asphalt, which is a -- for lack of a better reference, it's a warming issue that we all need to be aware of. We have way too much dark asphalt overall. I would like you to consider limiting your asphalt to aisles only on that westernmost large parking area and use grass -- with the exception of those couple of aisles up close to your facility that would have to be handicapped or more daytime and constant use. But once you get past the first two aisles, run asphalt in your travel lanes and leave all your parking spaces grass. Do you have any concerns with that? I know the base issue, I know the sod issue. But honestly, I think if we can do with less asphalt on this planet, we would have a lot better place to deal with. MR. HANCOCK: I don't disagree. The problem that a church faces, for example, is it's a financial issue. Unfortunately it's cheaper to do asphalt over a 20-year period than it is to maintain grass, unfortunately. I think if you will allow me to discuss it with the pastor, maybe when I come back up and we address this other language, I might have something more concrete to offer you, no pun intended. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You might want to consider the fact that our recommendation, if it's such, to limit this master plan, will save Page 41 16/i~ 41 December 6, 2007 you considerably more money over 20 years than coming back before this board every month. MR. HANCOCK: The weight of your recommendation is noted, SIr. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Tim, I've got to ask you a couple of questions about the Neapolitan PUD. I'm not sure how familiar you are with it. It's 90-16. MR. HANCOCK: Mr. Chairman, I thought I had a copy of it with me and I don't see it in my packet. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It might be a question I'm going to better ask of staff. It's not built. So I'm wondering, is this considered sunsetted, do you know? MR. HANCOCK: If you look at when we started our rezone, it would not have been. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: When did you start your rezone? Because it would have had a five-year window from 91-102, which was the establishment of our sunsetting provisions. By that would mean if you hadn't got 15 percent done by '96, it would have sunsetted. MR. HANCOCK: We started in 2003 with the application. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You would have needed 45 percent done by then, which you wouldn't have had. So I would think this is sunsetted in some manner, unless there is some other action that prevents it, a failure of government or something like that. Ray, do you know? MR. BELLOWS: I don't know if it's sunsetted, but your logic would apply. And I think it should be classified as sunsetted. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The reason that may be important is depending on what Nick's got to say when we talk to him about vested trips and things like that. Tim, that may be all, except for transportation, of which I have a lot more. Page 42 ~.:..)/ t., ;,-' 1"4 ,J . h '-+ December 6, 2007 So with that, I appreciate your time. Are there any other questions of Tim while he's up here, gentlemen, ma'am? (No response.) MR. HANCOCK: I'll do my best to listen with one ear while we speak to Mr. Klatzkow on this language. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. MR. CASALANGUIDA: For the record, Nick Casalanguida, Transportation. (Speaker was duly sworn.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good morning, Nick. MR. CASALANGUIDA: Good morning, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I watched you dance around the traffic corridor questions at the BCC meeting. You did a good job. MR. CASALANGUIDA: I'm a lousy dancer. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't think you answered their question in some regards, but you did a good job. MR. CASALANGUIDA: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'll ask the other members here first if they want to ask you any specific questions first. (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No? I went and found the traffic analysis for the new -- I didn't find it, actually, Melissa did at my request, the traffic analysis for the Neapolitan. And actually Tim's one that they did to provide us with today was not as bad as it would have been. Actually, he was more conservative in his approach. Based on what I can see here, their ending trips were much higher than what peak and -- entering and ending trips were much higher than what Tim indicated they were going to build. So in that regard, it actually comes out better for them. But they're going from 700 seats to 4,200 seats. I know they're Page 43 1 bl A IJ. I December 6, 2007 doing it off peak, they're doing it on the weekend, but they're relying upon a traffic access agreement that I haven't seen. Have you seen that in regards -- MR. CASALANGUIDA: I have not seen that agreement. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Do we know if one's in place? MR. CASALANGUIDA: I've spoken to Brian Howell probably about eight months ago, who's building that Dolphin site, and he said that that was agreeable to him to provide cross access. But I have not seen the agreement. It might beneficial to have the agreement in place or brought to the Board of County Commissioners before approval. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Do you know if that agreement, when it was devised? When the Dolphin one was I think put together a while back, they would have had to agree to this accessway at the time. And at the time were they realizing that they were agreeing to it for a 700-seat church or a 4,200-seat church? MR. CASALANGUIDA: You know, the difficult part is -- I go to St. Agnes. No church works well on a Sunday morning or a Saturday afternoon. And you can't design the access points to work well for a church. You look at 4,200 seats and you cut it in half and conservatively say two people per car, 2,000 cars leaving at the same time. Even if it's 1,000 cars, it's going to muck up the road system for a good hour. So you can't build the intersection. Now, I will say this: The intersections that are going to be designed, Santa Barbara and Davis, are designed to handle p.m. peak hour traffic significantly higher than Sunday traffic. For that one concentrated 20 minutes where they all leave church, you're going to have a problem there. But every single other church in the county does, too. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But see, my question about that access that's being -- that access easement area that they're utilizing, they have a statement in their TIS that says it was designed by Page 44 c; , f A It ~ecember 6: 2007 WilsonMiller. My question to you as our traffic engineer, it says these turn lanes have been designed and analyzed by WilsonMiller Engineering, the engineers who have designed the Dolphin Plaza property, and they already have a permit for the right-of-way work. My question is what did they design to for the impacts on that access? Did that intersection work that they now have a permit for? Is it with the intention of a 700 traffic-generated church or 4,200, or would it make a difference? MR. CASALANGUIDA: No. And it won't make a difference, and I'll tell you why. I have the WilsonMiller plans here, I pulled them this morning. The Dolphin Plaza is going to put in a northbound right turn lane as part of their site plan. The southbound left on Santa Barbara, which is an access point, is substandard because of the emergency access we have to provide to the EMS site, so -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You're talking way too fast. MR. CASALANGUIDA: The southbound left on Santa Barbara is underdesigned because of the EMS access we have to provide the emergency medical service. So again, I can't build any access point to any church to peak event, peak entrance-exit traffic. You just can't do it. St. Agnes, where I go is the same thing, you wait a half hour in the parking lot to leave and you wait to get in. Everybody's coming at the same time and leaving at the same time. Now, for point of clarification, on Davis Boulevard -- I spoke to the church fathers before I came up here and I said, I just want to be clear on two things, and maybe it wasn't clear in the PUD document. There is a 60-foot drainage utility easement that's in front of their -- on their property. It doesn't say right-of-way easement. I would like that clarified to read right-of-way easement as well, too. There is an existing eastbound left turn lane, and existing right turn lane. When we expand that road to six lanes -- and right now it's Page 45 16'1 A 4 December 6, 2007 four lanes divided, not two as we show -- I'll have to rebuild those turn lanes. If this site was not going to expand I would do that on the county's dime. What I asked the church fathers is when I rebuild this road that I get compensating right-of-way of 15 additional feet if! need it and that they pay for those turn lanes. And they've agreed to do that. And I think that's the best I'm going to do working with the church. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Maybe that answers the next question I was going to ask, because I think you referenced the same one. In their traffic report on Page 11 under the Davis Boulevard section, they talk about that currently the site provides two turn lanes. The right-hand turn lane is currently maxed out and will remain in place and operational during and after construction, with no modifications proposed. Is that the one you're referencing? MR. CASALANGUIDA: The right turn lane westbound is. And I'm not worried about that, because that's a decel. lane and you've got throats, so that will work okay. The left turn lane will have to be increased, either now or when we get the SDP, and I have copies of the site's aerial, or at the time I widen Davis Boulevard, depending on what we see as traffic impacts. My problem is I'm about a quarter mile from the intersection, I can only lengthen it so long before I get into the turn lanes for the intersection, but my median's pretty thick there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Nick, I have another one. I'm trying to figure out the best way -- well, there's a couple different ones. Under their trip distribution, Page 6 ofthe TIS, it says based on discussions with the pastor of New Hope Church, anticipated congregant draw will be about one-third from each of the three directions north, south and west. South? We don't have anything south, do we? MR. CASALANGUIDA: You will, Santa Barbara extension. Page 46 "~I /' ~" ;~~ ~I 1 j, t::, 9 h "~~. December 6, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. But currently there's a direction coming from the east. MR. CASALANGUIDA: East. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So he's saying that there's no congregants really coming from the east? MR. CASALANGUIDA: I show 25 percent of the driving coming from the east. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. If-- MR. CASALANGUIDA: And keep in mind, this started in 2003. I think in fairness to Davidson, we met and I finally put my hands up and said I'll deal with the traffic issues. They had three or four internal engineers that started the traffic statement, some people that were fairly new, and it got to the point where we met, I don't know, probably seven times. I said enough, no more traffic statements, I'm getting a headache. I said we'll review it based on what I know about the roadway capacities and the road projects that we have on it with respect to a church. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, then I want to clear a couple of things up for the record, but at the end I'm probably just going to ask your overall impression about this in regards to traffic and see where you go. Page 4, they talk about Phase 2 trip generation for a multi-use building, and they base their table of trips based on the church administrator's prediction. How scientific is that compared to the standards used in the traffic -- ITE? MR. CASALANGUIDA: It's not atypical to deal with a site like this and talk to the church and say what are you doing right now, what do you propose to use, and you take it on good faith, no pun intended. What I think, you could look at ITE, church sites, they do different things. So I look at worst case scenario. Even if I double the p.m. peak for ancillary uses I'm okay in the future. So you'd ask the overall opinion, I'm concerned about peak event Page 47 1 ',' c, 6 ~ecember 6, 2007 traffic. I can't do much about it. P.M. peak I know will be fine. If they agree to modifY their turn lanes in the future in the right-of-way I think I get an overall improvement to the system that they've helped me with. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We have a serious problem with Davis and 951. MR. CASALANGUIDA: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: A lot of times -- every time that I can recall we've received a TIS we have had a breakdown of the linkage impacts on each link that the area -- that any particular project impacts. And in this case we'd have to have Davis Boulevard both east and west and Santa Barbara at least north. I didn't see that percentage breakdown, and I know that Tim had indicated to me in a phone call that it was somewhere in here. MR. CASALANGUIDA: I think it's on page -- the one I have is Page 9. They have Davis and Santa Barbara to 951. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't see the percentage, though. Do you see that? MR. CASALANGUIDA: Percentage of trips? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Percentage of impact -- where it broaches the level of service impact that we need to be concerned about. MR. CASALANGUIDA: Tim, we've got seven different studies going around on this thing. Are we looking at the same one? Not the one I received? Could be. Let me take a look. Show me 14 over 153. Okay, I see where he's showing it to me. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, tell me. MR. CASALANGUIDA: He's showing less than three percent -- roughly one percent impact on that link, based on p.m. peak analysis, which is what 5.1 tells you to do. Even if! double that, Commissioner Strain, and I go to two percent impact or three percent impact, I'm still Page 48 : ,'- ~ Dece~ber 6~007 not going to have an adverse impact on the road going east. The first part of Davis I'm improving is from Radio to 951. State's five-year work program just came out and they still have 2011, 20]2 Santa Barbara to Radio in their work program. That's solid, that's been approved. So those links going east are both scheduled to be improved. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: In the analysis for the impact on the adjacent roadways, were you relying on any vested trips for this project? MR. CASALANGUIDA: I was not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So the Neapolitan approval of the PUD you had not factored in as a vested trip project? MR. CASALANGUIDA: I took what they had done on worst case scenario. I took 4,200 seats, cut it in half and said worst case on a Sunday you've got 2,000 cars. I asked them to do some Sunday analysis. Based on that, the roadway capacity, even with the additional cars, say 1,000 on each lane, is still below the service volume that we look under in p.m. peak design. So they were okay in terms of that. But will they muck up the roads on a Sunday for about a half hour? Yes, they will. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No more than the flea market used to and the drive-in theater across the street probably. MR. CASALANGUIDA: Probably no more. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: On Page 10, under CCMA requirements, Item D, flexible work schedules that are expected to reduce peak hour automobile work trips generated by the development. That's the standard they're supposed to be responding to. Their response is the addition of a multi-purpose building will generate little new trips and the hours of operation will coincide with that of the church. The church's main hours operation are during Sunday, which will not coincide with the peak hours of the adjacent roadway. Page 49 'Ii [ r'#f'.... lJl . Jl, 0 'i J.' 4, Decemb'er 6: 2007 How does that answer the question? MR. CASALANGUIDA: It really doesn't. And when they referenced the TCMA, and I can tell you again, we probably had five different TIS's done by five different people from Davidson going forward from 2003 till now. They were trying to go through what was in our policy 5.], they were trying to go through the Growth Management Plan, and they were responding to all of that in a sense of overkill. And I said don't worry about that, that's not going to be applicable to this project. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So Policy 6.2 is not applicable to this project? MR. CASALANGUIDA: They're not going to probably have to do the TCMA requirements when they come in for application, and that will be reviewed at SDP. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: On Page 12, the second paragraph, they talk about a significant remaining capacity in the middle of the paragraph, where it says while our project would only will impose another 579 Sunday trips, peak direction, peak hour under the segment. I'm trying to figure out how they got to that calculation. Because on Page 3, the existing peak hour is 536. So how can seven times the existing be only 579? Again, I may be reading it wrong, so I'm looking for clarification. MR. CASALANGUIDA: Peak hour, peak direction. I had said to you 4,200 seats, cut that in half, that's cars, that's worst case. You're looking at 2,000. Then you start splitting the trips up, in versus out in all directions, you get to like a quarter of that. So you get into 500 peak hour, peak direction because they're going to split 25 percent in all directions. So when you start looking at that, that's kind of where you can get to a number like that. Page 50 TI .~' ~ ~A 1+ .~ '1Jecember 6, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, the Sunday seats in the Page 3 looks like their peak hours are 536 entering and exiting -- or 228 -- I'm sorry, 211. Which one is the right one for their peak hours? Page 3. MR. CASALANGUIDA: I don't think they did a total. I gave them the number of 2,000. That's probably where you're getting the 500 from. I said assume worst case. So they probably took my guidance and put that in that response. Again, I've got to tell you -- on Page 3? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I know it's the existing trips. If they're seven times now the seating, it would seem to me logical that they're going to have some ratio of six or seven times what their existing is. If they're not, that's fine. But I haven't seen any -- I don't know what the reasoning as to why they're not. MR. CASALANGUIDA: You're talking about in versus out total trips. When you do peak hour, peak direction, remember, you're breaking total trips down into directions. They come out, they go different directions. If they've got two access points and one goes north, one goes south, you're getting a reduction. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So it's only one direction that this 579 is referring to. MR. CASALANGUIDA: Peak hour, peak direction. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That helps. Under the first bullet, I need to ask you how this is implemented. It talks about -- and it's on Page 12 again, that they've hired a patrol officer, and looks like he's been there 14 years -- he certainly likes his job -- and he's going to continue to service. Is this an element or an item that is required? MR. CASALANGUIDA: I don't think it's in our codes. I think it's a courtesy the church does to their members as well as to the public. I know at St. Agnes they have a police officer out there as well, too. Page 51 J1.L~" i'~" i~!~ ,"'" December 6, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does it have any factor into your analysis? MR. CASALANGUIDA: No. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's my traffic questions of you, Nick. Thank you very much. MR. CASALANGUIDA: You're welcome. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else that has any traffic questions or have I beat this to death? Thank you, sir -- oh, Donna? COMMISSIONER CARON: I just want to say thank you for the explanation, because I had that same question, but it's the peak direction that's being talked about here with the 579. MR. CASALANGUIDA: It's really hard to analyze a church. You don't really have -- you know it's going to be a problem, you do the best you can and go from there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you very much, sir. MR. CASALANGUIDA: So those stipulations or recommendations, Mark, were you able to notate those, about the -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I noted them, but I noted to say no because Nick asked for them. Did you want those introduced? MR. CASALANGUIDA: If! could. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: They're here, they're noted. Yes, sir, thank you. With that, we'll go into staff presentation. MS. ZONE: Good morning. Melissa Zone, Principal Planner with the Department of Zoning and Land Development. We're going to be brief in my presentation, since it was a very in-depth presentation from the applicant and transportation. For the record, New Hope Ministry is on a parcel that is zoned rural agricultural with a provisional use for the church use. And they have purchased the Neapolitan Park PUD, which is west of the church property, current church property. And Neapolitan Page 52 161,] J, Decerhber"t, 2007 Park PUD, by standards of the code, has sunsetted. Why they didn't go through the sunset process staff, you know, can determine that. And staff will ensure that your recommendations are placed in the PUD in front of the Board of County Commissioners. So I want that for the record. But there is a conflicting recommendation. Transportation wants the drainage easement along Davis Road, that 60- foot wide drainage easement, to also include right-of-way. But if that becomes, or if right-of-way can go into that 60-foot drainage easement, it could impact the Lely area stormwater project, and there could be issues. And Robert Wiley is here to address that, if you make that recommendation to include it as right-of-way with the stormwater. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, we're going to -- Nick's obviously got a comment on this -- MS. ZONE: I know. I know. As well as probably Robert Wiley. But I wanted this board, before you make the determination to hear both sides. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We will certainly, if we have questions ofMr. Wiley, we'll certainly bring him up here and ask questions of him, since he is here. MS. ZONE: If there's any questions for me, I'm happy to address them; otherwise, staffwill support planning commission's recommendations. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Nick, would you mind addressing that comment about the -- MR. CASALANGUIDA: Not at all. The LASIP manager who works on that was Robert, is now Jerry Kurtz, who's in our building, and we coordinate -- all road projects for LASIP are coordinated with road projects, so there will not be a conflict. It's just a clarification that says 60 feet of drainage and utility easement -- it says right-of-way and I need two feet of that. I wouldn't want to have to come back for clarification. But Lely would take Page 53 16'/ A 4 December 6, 2007 precedence over roadway expansion, so that's not -- will not be a conflict. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Are there any questions of staff before I go to public speakers? Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah, Melissa, I just wanted to let you know that on Page 3 of 8, I think you've got east and west confused. MS. ZONE: Oh, I did. And, you know what, I'll make sure that's corrected for the -- to be presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Thank you for pointing that out. COMMISSIONER CARON: Then if you go to your rezone findings for PUDs, couple of things. On number four, on Page 2 of3, it's talking about internal and external compatibility. And one of the things that you say as far as a pro is concerned is the proposed rezone document incorporated design and buffering requirements. Additional buffering requirements might be incorporated during the development order process. Or we could be stipulating something here today, correct? MS. ZONE: Correct. COMMISSIONER CARON: And I just want to cite an example for the rest of the CCPC. Mr. Hancock pointed out that in -- that while they've been very careful here to try to make sure that lakes and preserves abut all of the homes, one or two of these homes apparently are not included. And so I'll ask Mr. Hancock afterward, but I think it would be appropriate for us to stipulate now that additional buffering be granted to those residential units. MS. ZONE: I will address that. And also, they had asked for a recommendation -- or a deviation for the wall adjacent to the residential. And staff didn't support that deviation because we wanted when they come in through the SDP Page 54 " ,;.' , . f."". r l i' ".. 't {, 4;, , ri J', December 6, 2007 process, there's -- in the LDC, they can come in for a fence waiver. And at that time we could determine if they do the fence waiver against the residential property, they have to enhance the buffering to what the standards would be. So that's also another mechanism to -- in addition to the PUD process or the rezoning process, that we would make sure when they come in -- if they do come in for the administrative fence waiver. If not, there will be a fence there to buffer those residential parcels. COMMISSIONER CARON: So you're not supportive ofa PUD deviation for fences -- MS. ZONE: Correct. COMMISSIONER CARON: -- and a wall? MS. ZONE: We're not supporting that. We're saying that if they want the fence waiver, they would have to come in and submit an application and have us look at it more in detail. COMMISSIONER CARON: But that's not on your recommendations. MS. ZONE: Well, no, in the staff report I say we're not recommending that deviation. COMMISSIONER CARON: But wouldn't it end up being one of your recommendations as well not to? MS. ZONE: Usually we're not supporting it. But if you want, I could add that in that we're not -- because they're asking -- staff gave an explanation why we're not supporting it. And -- but if you want me to present it differently, I'm more than happy to work with -- COMMISSIONER CARON: I just think we need to be specific again. And we're trying to be very specific and make sure we include all of these things as to whether they're supported or not supported. MS. ZONE: Certainly. It's on Page 6 of8 in the staff report. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, are there any other questions before we go to public speakers? Mr. Midney? Page 55 .7 A 4 December 6, 2007 COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yes, I notice in the Exhibit A, area one is existed native preservation and water management area. So that means that you're combining water management with native preservation, and that's already been there before. Is that kind of combination something that is still normal practice, or are we trying to separate water management areas from preservation areas? MS. ZONE: I know that they're wanting to separate them. I don't believe the LDC amendment -- Barbara might be more informed of that -- has gone through yet or not. But as a whole, that's how they are looking at it now. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: In the future. MS. ZONE: Correct. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Could you have you or somebody else try to explain the sort of controversy or disagreement between staff and the applicant in terms of whether they want to have the water pre-treated or whether they want to prohibit all water from going into the preserve area? MS. ZONE: Yes. And I have here, and I'd like to read it into the record, there is a recommendation that staff has looked at since this discussion, and to read into the record for a new stipulation for this water treatment. It would be that receipt of treated stormwater discharge where such use, including conveyance, treatment and discharge structures does not result in adverse impacts to the naturally occurring native vegetation, to include the loss of the minimum required vegetation and the harm to any listed species, according to the policies associated with Objective 7.1, as determined by criteria set forth in land development regulations. Discharge to preserves having wetlands requires treatment that will meet water quality standards as set forth in Chapter 62-302 of the Florida F AC, it's Florida -- Page 56 16i 4ec~ber 6, 2007 , COMMISSIONER CARON: Administrative Code. MS. ZONE: Thank you, I had a loss there. Florida Administrative Code. And now I've lost it. MR. SCHMITT: The reading is the language from the CCME. I think Barbara is going to have to read the stipulations. MS. ZONE: Sorry, I thought that was the stipulation you wanted m. MS. BURGESON: For the record, Barbara Burgeson with Engineering and Environmental Services Department. The original staff report that you received with the stipulation regarding the stormwater was not recommended by environmental or engineering. That was -- it accidentally got into the staff report. It was part of discussions back and forth. But the final determination by the engineering and environmental services staff department consolidated determination that the appropriate stipulation for that staff report should never have been what you had in your original staff report. It should have been what was amended and sent out to you, that no storm water would be permitted in the upland preserve. And there's a number of things that I wanted to put on record, just to give you some back-up for that. The first that I wanted to correct, or at least expand on, is that the EAC, Environmental Advisory Council, did approve this project. It was not a unanimous approval. One EAC member did deny the project for environmental reasons. But the reason that the remainder of the EAC approved the project, and as they cited on record was not for any environmental reasons at all. All of the reasons that they cited to approve the project was based on the use. And they felt that it was a good use in a good location. It was not -- there was not environmental basis for their approval. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Before you go farther, Barbara, on that point I'd like to ask the county attorney, this is happening more often. Page 57 6 ;~ 4' , I December 6, 2007 Why is the EAC getting involved in planning issues that are outside their jurisdiction, which is basically they're an Environmental Advisory Council. And this has happened on other projects. I'm just curious as what product analysis, use analysis they really have to offer when their whole objective is environmental. MR. KLATZKOW: This office allows a free discussion from all boards on issues that they deem to be appropriate. We don't tell a board what they should say or what they shouldn't say. If the Board of County Commissioners starts to feel otherwise, I'm sure it will be communicated downstream to them. MS. BURGESON: We do attempt to keep the EAC focused on just environmental issues. This is one of the -- we rarely see where they go off, stray quite so much as they did on this one particular project. But I just wanted to put that on public record, that it may have sounded like they supported the site plan environmentally, but that was not the basis for the five people to support the site plan. And also, earlier in the discussion there was a comment about vacating a conservation easement. The original New Hope property, the original 20 acres had the entire rear half of the property under a conservation easement. And that was part of the property that had to have the conservation easement vacated. I'm not sure if that's been done yet or whether they're still in the process to assure that that gets done. That was under -- placed under a conservation easement because of the red-cockaded woodpecker use on that site and the cavity trees that were in that area and one that was on that site. During site visits back with Nino Spagna and Kim Dryden and myself, we noticed foraging RCWs on that site, back when their original project was approved. So that's where the vacation of that easement -- I believe that they did mitigation off-site, and that the RCWs at that point when the state accepted off-site mitigation and Page 58 16 -, De1emb~ 6, 2007 vacating that easement, there was no use of that rear portion of the property for RCWs. I also wanted to just put on public record at the -- two items: One is the Board of County Commissioners' final hearing for the language that was approved for the Growth Management Plan. And when the Growth Management Plan language was discussed at that final hearing, there was an attempt to -- or a proposal to modifY what the EAC and this planning commission had recommended, which was no adverse impacts. And at one point both the EAC and the planning commission had recommended language that said that it needed to actually benefit the preserve. But then at your final meeting for that hearing, the language went from benefit to no adverse impacts. At the Board of County Commissioners a recommendation was made to change that language. And then towards the end of that meeting, as it was rediscussed, brought back up for a final evaluation of that proposed change of the language, it went back to no adverse impact language. And in that discussion, Commissioner Henning discussed with -- also with Commissioner Halas and Bill Lorenz, had a fairly in-depth discussion in terms of that Commissioner Henning had stated that it's not there to put extra stormwater on vegetation that won't accept it. If it's acceptable and won't degrade it, that's the whole purpose of it. They talked about putting stormwater into a system that necessarily is not used to that much stormwater. And that's why we have the adverse impact statement in there, inclined to allow this to clarifY the details of the criteria in the Land Development Code. But as Mr. -- Commissioner Henning stated, that he would have a problem if they were trying to degrade existing upland species. That is not the objective. So that was the discussions even at the final planning commission hearing, that the objection is the stormwater was not to Page 59 J (. A 4.! December 6, 2007 provide a negative or change to the upland vegetation. Now, concern that staff has is twofold: One, we went through an LDC cycle at length last go around. We had created some pretty specific language that went to the EAC and the planning commission and the board that identified that it was appropriate for stormwater in wetlands, and we limited the stormwater to hydric upland soils. But we were saying that non-hydric upland soils were inappropriate because of the potential change to that vegetation, that the reason that we were protecting these preserves as they were selected was because of the descending criteria. For instance, if we selected a particular upland preserve, it was because that vegetation on-site had a higher function and quality than the lower quality wetland on-site. And so to allow that upland to be impacted with more water than is normal may not cause that vegetation necessarily to immediately die off, but to probably -- and as put on that public record at the board hearing, that it would definitely degrade the vegetation in that upland by having the longer hydroperiod, the longer inundation of the upland. Even the berm around it could have had a spreader swale to allow that, if you had natural rainfall that might be bermed into that area to naturally be discharged as opposed to, as the applicant says, that it would just be a bathtub. You have the ability to do that differently. The -- all of the information that we had and reviewed by staff indicated that we do not have -- we do not have the comfort level that we could find this consistent with the GMP policies or the policies that we are currently working on for 2008 first cycle. We are not proposing language to allow this in the language that we're in draft form right now. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Barbara, are you about to wrap up your part of it? MS. BURGESON: I can be done. Page 60 161 PI J t" ,,1. e December 6, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. The only reason is, I didn't think we were going to get into this. I thought we were about done with this one, and I apologize, Cherie', for not stopping at 10:00. We will stop now and reconvene at 10:30 and provide you with the break you should have gotten. Thank you. (A break was taken.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, everybody, welcome back from our break. We left off, Barbara was getting close to wrapping up a presentation. I'll ask her if she has any final comments before we ask any questions. Barbara, there is some questions from several members here of the planning commission. The first one was Brad, then Mr. Midney, then Ms. Caron. Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And Barbara, it goes way back to the first thing you said is that we have a report that the Environmental Advisory Council voted 5-1. But you said that that wasn't an environmental council meeting, that was -- MS. BURGESON: No, I said that was an environmental meeting but the vote was not -- when they put on record why they voted for it, they did not list environmental reasons. The reasons that they supported it were not based on the environmental Conservation Collier -- the CCME or the environmental sections of the Land Development Code. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The concern I have is we have an environmental issue that they reviewed, and from the vote it appeared they support it, but you're up here negating that support. MS. BURGESON: I'm saying they supported it, but the discussion was based on they thought that the church was a good use of the property, that because of where the location was that they would support a church in this area, that maybe more people would go Page 61 "h A J. ..Ii,. '",! ~ Dectmber 6, 2007 to church. I mean, the discussion was not focused on environmental Issues. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So nowhere in here did they discuss the issue of putting stormwater into the preserve -- MS. BURGESON: They did discuss it. And the only person that voted against the project was voting against it based on the environmental concern. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: This is my last point. So can I assume that the people who voted for it knew of that concern and didn't have a problem with it? I mean, it's the Environmental Advisory Council, it's not the planning commission. MS. BURGESON: I could not say that-- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: If you can't say it, that's good enough. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Barbara, if I was watching a BCC meeting and I heard staff characterize our vote in the manner you have characterized theirs, I would be concerned over it. I don't think it's appropriate. I think that they voted the way they did because they reviewed everything. Now, they may have complimented the uses, they may have complimented the fact more people need to go to church, but the point is they didn't come out as a majority against it for any environmental reason. And I think they would have if they thought there was one there. And I think that's maybe the basis we ought to be relying upon, not anything else at this point. Mr. Midney, you were next. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, just to go back to what Brad is saying. They didn't put any stipulations in. I mean, if they had some -- if they were unhappy about the environmental aspects, I would have thought that they would have put in some stipulations. And they didn't do that; is that correct? The EAC, they didn't -- you Page 62 11'" fl, r, i1 ~"~ J December 6, 2007 " ebb, said that they -- MS. BURGESON: They didn't add stipulations. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Okay. Is the environmental department's objections related to nutrients entering in or just change in the water table? MS. BURGESON: Staffs recommendation on the EAC-- COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, staffs recommendations on this development. And their objection to any stormwater entering the site, is that based on nutrients or is it just based on water table? MS. BURGESON: It's mostly based on the water table and the inundation, not on the nutrients. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: How can you prove that there will be no adverse impact of a development onto this upland preserve? MS. BURGESON: The evidence that we were using was the tables that evaluated the inundation, typical inundation periods of -- and the hydroperiod in a typical upland. We looked at what the maximum amount of stormwater in that area might be acceptable in terms of under normal circumstances. But that's without a berm around it holding it in. And remember, too, that that is always without the consideration for the duration after that event. So if you look at the evaluation for let's just say a storm event that is going to pop off into that preserve area, and they say that it's just going to go up to, you know, maybe two or three inches or three or four inches under normal conditions, if that preserve didn't have a berm around it and wasn't actually part of the stormwater system where the intent is to retain it there for a duration of 12 to 15 days. So you're talking about each of those events has an extended period of inundation. We had -- no one that we talked to felt that that -- that they felt comfortable that that would not -- they could not prove that that would not have a negative impact to upland vegetation, especially where the upland vegetation was in non-hydric soils. Page 63 16 r ,A 4 December 6, 2007 I mean, and through the whole year of research that we did with the last LDC cycle, we came up with the concept back and forth with the stakeholders group that upland soils were not appropriate. And that recommendation through that whole process never included upland soils, it included wetland soils and hydric soils that might not be jurisdictional. But these are not even hydric soils, these are non-hydric upland soils. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: I'm starting to understand what you're saying. If they're building it up, the area around it, the drainage, I guess, would be going down. Usually you think of an upland as an area where water would drain out of. But you're saying I guess that where they build up the area with fill and everything that it will become an area where water will drain into it. MS. BURGESON: Where it pops off after certain major events. And the concern isn't necessarily how often that does that, but the concern is the duration of that inundation in that upland area. And there's another issue, too, and that is when you talk about an upland area and upland soils and the vegetation, particularly the ground cover that's in that area being completely flooded, one ofthe things that's important to know is that it's not just whether or not that area can accept a minimal amount of flooding, but there's also a critical dry-down period that is necessary for uplands and upland plants, and particularly ground cover, to be healthy and successful. And if what you're doing is just keeping it a little bit wetter all of the summer, and even if it's just a little bit, you're in the root system, you're not allowing the natural dry-down and the actual need for an extreme dry-down in an upland area. So there wasn't -- and for the whole reason that we went for this last process, not including upland soils, we feel that the language in the GMP that requires, and in the discussions with Commissioner Henning, Commissioner Halas and Mr. Lorenz, to not negatively Page 64 fl tZ R ,J~ !'~1 H ft ' j. n '1 ,j' 4 L~~ December 6, 2007 impact the upland vegetation, that this would not be -- this would be not consistent with that GMP language. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: So do you have any suggestions about how they could manage their stormwater so that it wouldn't have to go there? Because it seems like it's going to be kind of hard -- they're not talking about directly discharging in by any kind of piping or anything, but just seepage through the water table. How can you avoid that? MS. BURGESON: I understand that from other discussions that that is a lot more complicated, to design a stormwater system to keep the -- the point here is directed stormwater into that system. We can't -- we don't have a GMP language that specifically says that you can't change the ground table. We do everything we can to prevent stormwater being added into that preserve as an additional threat to the upland vegetation, native vegetation in there. But we do have e-mails back and forth on this particular project where the project manager did say please -- because our recommendation was denial of this project initially. And then we said well, we don't have a stipulation that will allow us to approve this. And then the recommendation from that applicant was we'll accept language as a stipulation that there will be no stormwater in the upland preserve, and we will work around that. And we've got that in an e-mail that they offered that they could do that. And so there must be -- and I'm not an engineer designer, but there must be some other opportunity to design that project, if that was offered in an e-mail to us, in order to approve the project. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Okay, so you are recognizing that they're not directly discharging in there by any piping, it would just be by the seepage from the water table. But -- MS. BURGESON: Well, their proposed plan is direct discharge. It is as popping off over the system, it is. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Tim, we're certainly going to provide Page 65 ~ F ,1 ; /...' _i... ~: ~~ ll,( 4 H ~ December 6, 2007 you time to rebut, so -- MR. HANCOCK: Sorry. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Okay. All right, thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah, I'm a little concerned, and I want to go back to the issue of this vacation of the conservation easement. You made a statement that half of the back of the current project was a conservation easement. MS. BURGESON: Correct. That was -- half of that property was preserved through the previous SDP as listed species preserves and required a state conservation easement on it. COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay. And I read in the back-up material that they had mitigated for any listed species issues. MS. BURGESON: Urn-hum. COMMISSIONER CARON: Now, does the environmental and engineering staff agree that we as a county are getting more in preservation at this point than we would have gotten otherwise? In other words, I'm trying not to lose -- I mean, understanding that they've mitigated, so that -- MS. BURGESON: Right. I don't have any specific information on what that off-site mitigation was. We were concerned to make sure that the project was compliant with the current GMPs for minimum preservation of native vegetation on-site. And since, the listed species surveys identified that the RCW were no longer on the property. So I can't tell you whether -- assuming that 50 percent of that site, they had originally close to a 10-acre preserve, sayan eight-acre preserve, we are getting less preservation on this site. I don't know what the off-site mitigation acreage is. COMMISSIONER CARON: I'll ask Mr. Hancock, thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I respect the fact that you're trying to do your job, no question about that. Page 66 Decln~er'6,10074 But you indicated that there -- in conversations with Commissioner Henning and others that they felt, you feel, that there could be no inundation or putting water into those upland preserves, and I appreciate that. But I have -- Mr. Hancock indicated that they attempted to respond to each and every request for scientific determination of when something can be shown proven, scientifically proven, that it will degrade the vegetation. And from what I heard, and unless I'm in error in what I heard, it sounded as though the probability level is extremely low for these events. Is there any standard that you use to reference at what point we should not allow any development relative to such a condition? I mean, is there any point where you will accept that there's a scientific basis for going forward? MS. BURGESON: Yes. And we are in the process of -- Margie asked that I not discuss too much ofthe draft LDC stuff because it's not been approved or aired yet, but we are in the process of creating . . , cntena. And for this project, because it comes before aUuf that criteria is created, we went through all of the evaluation of all of the data that was presented to us and the applicant's attempt to support that this would not be a negative impact to this upland soils and upland preserve. And staffs full evaluation and discussion with engineering and environmental, the conclusion has been from the beginning, each time additional information was provided to try to support or change staffs mind that the scientific data would support this stormwater in the upland preserve, staff did not feel -- not feel -- staff did not evaluate it the way the applicant is presenting it to you to feel comfortable that that would not be an adverse impact. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So you're telling us that you have those criteria. Page 67 II II<t 16' A 4 December 6, 2007 MS. BURGESON: We are working on that criteria right now for COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So then you don't have those criteria? MS. BURGESON: Correct. We have the-- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Well, if you don't have those criteria, how could you possibly make a determination? MS. BURGESON: We have the criteria that we developed through or were using through the LDC cycle last year to come up with the language that we had proposed through the entire LDC cycle that this board approved last year, and went to the Board of County Commissioners and only got to that final meeting where there was a change in that language. And we have done a handful of reviews and projects where we have evaluated whether it's appropriate to put stormwater in non-wetlands, non-jurisdictional wetlands, and have permitted that through this similar type of evaluation. But those have always been hydric soils and not non-hydric -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I hear you and I respect the fact that you are attempting to do your job, but I don't think-- MS. BURGESON: We do have criteria that we've been using. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You two can't talk over one another. And I think we heard the story. I think we know what you're going to say if we ask you another question. I have no further questions. Anybody on this panel? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Ray, do we have any public speakers? MR. BELLOWS: We have three public speakers, but I believe they're affiliated with the church. Grant Thigpen, Pete Smith and Earl Morgan. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ifany of you gentleman would like to Page 68 i~ f! f It 1. Deceiriber 6, 2007 speak, you need to come up to the podium and identifY yourselves for the record. And we ask that you limit your discussion to five minutes. Thank you. MR. THIGPEN: Grant Thigpen, Pastor of New Hope Ministries. I want to thank you for seeing us this morning. Really, I think Tim has pretty well voiced all of my concerns and has represented the church very well this morning. And I would just ask you to -- by the way, I don't envy you having to do this. But I just ask you to take into consideration what the EAC has recommended and go with it and let us move on and do what we're called to do. But I appreciate you, thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, sir. Any of the other speakers wish to speak? Ifwe they do so, please come on up. (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Nope, doesn't look like it, Ray. Okay, with that, Tim, do you want to take a short rebuttal? MR. HANCOCK: The word short well noted, Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. MR. HANCOCK: It was not our intent to engage you in a policy discussion today about stormwater management and preserves, but to display as clearly as we can the extreme effort we've gone to show on this site that it works. I think we have done that. I think the EAC decision reflects that effort and the evidence put into record, despite the characterizations you heard today. I was at that meeting. I'm pretty sure I was, I presented the information. And the EAC minutes reflect that one of the key issues was the lack of a standard. And in the face of the lack of a standard you have to use what is reasonable and prudent. And we as an applicant met at a minimum that standard. The only standard that's been touted out there is Mike Duever's Page 69 ._"/' !, J-CI December 6, 2007 ~ r 1 l,,~~ report which talks about the transition of a hydric soil condition of mesic flatwoods to a wetter soil condition of hydric flatwoods. We don't trip it. I don't know what else we can say in the absence of a standard. The RCW issue, I want to be very clear about this. That preserve, Commissioner Caron, was for an RCW colony, which no longer existed. They even went to the extent of 30 days of continuous video taping and whatnot. And the agencies all signed off that the RCWs were no longer present or nesting. In a form of mitigation for the church when it was originally built, 30 acres were purchased off-site for a combination of wetland and RCW mitigation, and were then improved and exotics removed and so forth. So any concern about a net loss, actually it goes the other way, there's a net of -- an increase in land being set aside, when you combine all of the elements together. There's a patently false statement by Ms. Burgeson that I have to point out when she indicated direct discharge into the preserve. I don't know if it's a lack of understanding, I don't know what it is. But our water management plan associated with this project under the SDP review includes all stormwater entering a dry pre-treatment area, then into a lake before discharging into the preserve. The only direct discharge into that preserve is rainfall under our plan. Characterizing water that comes out of a lake which is part of a water management system as direct discharge is not true. What is true is when you do directly discharge, that's what you get. (Indicating.) Wow, that's awful. I'd hate to see that happen. This is where the water will be going, nine to 15 days a year. I don't see ground cover drowning in that picture. Folks, what is an individual approval that we're seeking has been turned into a policy directive by the environmental staff, and we're not buying it. Page 70 16 J A ), December 6, 23"07 We've proved our case, we've made the best effort we can. We can only ask for your consideration. And I apologize for placing you in this position, but on this project where we have nine years of proof that direct discharge has not adversely affected a preserve, for us to pre-treat water three times the commercial requirement prior to discharge into a preserve, meaning less water, less hydroperiod influence, and to ask for your consideration I hope is more than appropriate. With that, sir, I'll answer any other questions you may have. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, could the drainage system be redesigned to avoid even indirect water table shifts into the upland preserve? MR. HANCOCK: Yes, sir. All that requires is that we give more land up and lose the use of it. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: How much more would you estimate that it would take? MR. HANCOCK: It would require the construction of an additional lake structure, because the existing lake is wrapped on three sides by the preserve. Due to the side slopes required to even achieve a one-foot across the board volume in this, it may be as much as two acres. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: When you say that the lake is what directly goes into the preserve, is there a berm between the lake and the preserve? Or what is it like, the lake merging into a wetland? MR. HANCOCK: The western edge ofthe lake itself -- and I'll provide the soon to be simplified plan for you. The lake in the upper right hand comer there, as the water enters that lake it will spill over that lake on the western side at grade into the preserve. So no, there's -- it doesn't have to breach a berm necessarily. Now you will naturally, when the lake is constructed, the edges of the lake will come up a little bit, just by nature of construction. But Page 71 161 A 4 December 6, 2007 the water will, almost like a spreader swale, if it gets to that point it will then spread out into the preserve. We're not berming the preserve. What we have to do is we have to elevate the balance of the site in order to meet South Florida District criteria for finish floor elevation. So by elevating the rest of the site, it's a de facto berm. But let me point out that it's happening on the other two sides of these preserves without us doing anything. The difference is, no matter what happens water will never sheet flow out of this preserve. Whether we put storm water management or not, water will cease to sheet flow across this site. The question is, is it better for the preserve to connect it to a water management system with a positive outflow, or do we allow it to in essence be bermed and isolated and require that the water leave only one way, vertically? Our answer is no. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anything else? Ms. Caron, did you have -- did anybody else have anything? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Tim, I had asked you to research two questions that we had talked about earlier, and I was wondering if you've gotten responses to those. MR. HANCOCK: Yes, sir, and I hope they will please you. On the issue of the language that you put forth, we've reviewed it with Mr. Klatzkow, and for this particular use in this land we have no objection to the inclusion of that language. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. MR. HANCOCK: The second issues, Mr. Casalanguida mentioned a IS-foot -- or changing that easement to include right-of-way. We have no issue with that. He had requested that the church -- if the turn lanes are required to be extended prior to the road widening, we have to pay for that. If they are extended as a function of the roadway widening, we will Page 72 , - t f~> J tf '1 11 (~ December 6, 2007 participate in that also. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I asked you about eliminating the asphalt for the parking spaces and do asphalt aisles only with the exception of the two easternmost lanes in that westernmost large parking lot. How do you feel about that? MR. HANCOCK: I'd like to go a slightly different route but I think gets there. While the LDC allows for up to 70 percent impervious, there's no minimum. In other words, you don't have to do any. What we'd like to suggest is that we think we can very easily live with a minimum of 30 percent of all required parking for the church will be of pervious surfaces. And we think that what that allows us to do is because that includes the existing parking, which is paved, so we don't get ourselves in a bind there, it results in about half of the required additional parking ending up as pervious. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anything's better than nothing. I think that's fine. Anybody else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Tim, I have one last comment to make, and your aerial portrays it pretty well. First of all, there's a lake in the bottom of the aerial, and there's one in the north right-hand comer. The property, you're digging another lake. During the rural fringe and during the stewardship area lands review five years ago the environmental community was very concerned about excavations close to preserves. Their argument was that the closer you get with an excavation, the more change to the hydrology and the draining of those preserves is going to occur as a result of that excavation. And so we had minimum standards. And I think they were asking for 2,500 feet, and I think we ended up with maybe 1,500 or something like that. Page 73 C:J //'. .c A 4 I: ...... I. '''"' , ) December 6, 2007 In this case your lakes are adjacent, contiguous or part of the preserves. The hydrology is going to change in those preserves. So from the testimony you supplied today and the engineering that you supplied today, not only do I feel that you are not having an adverse impact to those preserves, you're having a positive impact to those preserves, and I'm glad that you're doing what you're proposing to do. So with that, I have no other questions or comments. Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I just have, and this is a huge question. What was the problem with the dock again? I didn't -- MR. HANCOCK: I'll have to defer to Ms. Caron. We quite candidly haven't been hanging our hat on the dock anyways, so -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: It's a nice little pond, the kids might want a nice little dock. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: It's the same with a boardwalk. COMMISSIONER CARON: I asked. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The boardwalk wasn't removed. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But Donna, you really don't want their ability to put a dock in the pond? COMMISSIONER CARON: No, no, no. I asked a question about why there was boat docks, plural, in this proposal when they have a very tiny little lake that -- MR. HANCOCK: We'd rather remove the concern than fight for the docks. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So you are taking it out? MR. HANCOCK: I'm happy to remove it. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'm not going to fight much for that. It just seems -- I mean, the kids could have a canoe dock. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Before we go there, Donna, do you care if the dock's in or out? You were just asking a question, right? COMMISSIONER CARON: I just asked a question. It was a very simple question, along with several others about uses that are on Page 74 i'l 11 t I', 11 De~m~e~16, 2067 that property, about printing uses and -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So we can put it back in. COMMISSIONER CARON: -- book stores and everything else. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right, I think in an effort to not cause a problem, we jumped to a conclusion that that was something that somebody didn't want. I don't think that's the case. So why don't we just not strike boat docks and just leave it there. MR. HANCOCK: Applicant agrees to leave it in. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Now, what about a marina? Would you like to go for a marina? COMMISSIONER CARON: No. MR. HANCOCK: Nothing over 35 feet, I promise. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ifthere's no other questions-- COMMISSIONER CARON: Don't worry, administratively you can have it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti, did you have a question? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: No, I'm waiting for discussion. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, we've got to close the public hearing first, that's where I was leading to. No other public speakers? We'll close the public hearing and we'll first entertain a motion. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I will entertain a motion of approval. But I'd like to make a discussion beforehand, or do I need a second? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: I'll second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Why don't we -- yeah, why don't we make a motion, then we'd have a discussion as part of the motion. So Mr. Vigliotti made the motion, Mr. Midney seconded. And Mr. Vigliotti wanted to make a statement with the motion. So go ahead, sir. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: It would be good to know what the motion was. Page 75 16 J: ,;, December 6, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion of approval. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'm really concerned about staffs confusion on this. I'm really disappointed. Staff has recommendations that should have been in that were noted under deviations that aren't here. We got stipulations that came last night, it was early. I have no idea how that happened. Then we're being told that the wording was wrong on the ones we have. Also, we spent most of our time talking about environmental issues and we have an EAC that knows, I believe, more than we do here. And I think we should go with their recommendation. So I'm going to make a recommendation for approval without any stipulations and putting in a 30 percent impervious parking, and I'm sure commissioners have others, so -- COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I'll second the motion. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, Mr. Midney already seconded the motion. Mr. Midney, you still second the refined motion, as we'll call it? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Urn-hum. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Motion's been made and seconded. Now we have discussion. And I certainly have -- I have 11 notes that have to be discussed. And Mr. Adelstein wanted to comment. Go ahead, Mr. Adelstein. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: No, it's all right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody else want to offer any discussion before I go into the stipulations? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: No, I'm waiting for your additional notes. COMMISSIONER CARON: Just notes that I-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney, you had something you want to say first? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, I just kind of agree with Mr. Vigliotti, that if the EAC supports it, and they have more expertise Page 76 !~e~Ar 6, lJo07 about that than I do, then I'll go along with that. But I am interested in that there be some sort of standards so that, you know, if environmental staff does want to prevent water being discharged into uplands, that there be something concrete that we can go on. And I'm not opposed to the idea of prohibition of drainage into uplands, but I would like it to be something that could be more provable. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, sir. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'd like to add one thing. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead, Mr. Vigliotti. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Over the last few months we've had quite a few churches come in for PUDs and new construction and expansion. I'm really glad to see the churches getting together and realizing this county is growing and they're stepping up to the plate to the needs of the community and preparing to grow, because it's a costly and expensive situation for a church to grow, and I'm just glad to see they're all stepping up to the plate. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, the notes that I have, the first one is involving the topic we spent probably way too much time on and that's the wetlands, or the discharge. And basically staff had given us a recommendation originally and then followed it up by a second recommendation. The first recommendation, the applicant has already said they can design to and they agree with, and I think it's a good recommendation. And it reads as follows: The CFPUD and master plan shall full (sic) water quality pre-treatment volume before the water reaches an elevation that would have the lake overflow its banks and then backflow into the natural ground areas, parentheses, preserves. I would suggest that part of our stipulation, that is the recommendation that we include. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: That's fine. I'll add that to my Page 77 161/: 4'~ December 6, 2007 motion. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: (Indicating.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The second does too. Okay. The next item I have is -- we clarified some language, and I'll go through it all. Maybe we'll get a comment at the end. 4.2.8.3, the water management structures that are used -- you have placed in the preserves will only be those required by the permitting agencies. We'll strike Item 5.8.C. I'm not sure what that is, I didn't make a note on it. I'll double check right now so we don't have a mistake. Thank you, Ms. Caron will get that. While she's doing that I'll go on to the next one. The PUD boundary setback to residentially adjacent properties for accessory structures will be the same as principal, 25 feet. And Ms. Caron, is that -- COMMISSIONER CARON: 5.8.C was the conservation easement vacation. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh, that's right, there wasn't any -- the need, and so we're going to strike that from the PUD. COMMISSIONER CARON: It's already happened, according to the applicant. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. Under number five, which was the allowable uses in the preserves: The paths, bikeways and pathways referenced will be for non-paved surfaces, excluding of course the boardwalk, which wouldn't qualifY for that. That was 4.2.A.2. The master plan will be modified to produce it as a conceptual master plan, because the one that was obtained here is an SDP plan, which would actually lock you in and cause you to be here many more times than you need to be. The master plan shows parking. The 30 percent of the parking will be impervious. Yeah, will be impervious -- will be pervious areas, not impervious, will be pervious areas. Page 78 1" {-, , ~ ,\~; A December 6,20 7 Okay, now those are the items in the PUD that I found. Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: No, no, you're-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: First, before we go further -- I've got more, but let us finish the PUD ones up first. Does the motion maker agree with those for the PUD? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Yes, I do. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does the second? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Then the next ones that I have, there was a -- Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Before you go off of that, did you talk about the 25 feet -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay. I didn't check that off. Sorry . CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No problem. We talked about verification that the access agreement between -- for that other access on Santa Barbara is in place and should be provided to the BCC by the time this gets to them. That the right-of-way easement on the south side of the property along Santa Barbara that's now shown as a drainage easement will also be shown as a right-of-way -- I mean, it's a drainage easement that will be shown as a right-of-way easement as well. MR. HANCOCK: I believe that's Davis. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Davis. I'm sorry, I said Santa Barbara. I'm glad you corrected me, thank you. That the applicant has agreed for providing compensating right-of-way for any additional turn lanes and to pay for the turn lanes that are going to be installed to service their facility. Page 79 lr .r, /'1 ^,J;, /.( December 6, 2007 Staff is going to add a comment to show that they are not supportive of the deviation request and the reasoning why. And that the applicant has agreed to add the incompatible language that we introduced in the previous PUDs last week, same language. Are there anything that I missed? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Yeah. Three stories, not to exceed 48 feet. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. That was a grammatical change, but that's fine, that was one we brought up. With those changes and those stipulations in mind, does the motion maker accept those as part of the stipulation? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Yes, I do. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does the second? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: (Nodding.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Second does by nodding affirmatively. Any other discussion amongst the panel? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All those in favor, signifY by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries unanimously 7-0. Thank you. MR. HANCOCK: Thank you. Page 80 16/A 4 December 6, 2007 Item #8B PETITION: PUDZ-2005-AR-8416, DISTINCTIVE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT LIVINGSTON, LLC CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, the next item up today is Petition PUDZ-2005-AR-8416, Distinctive Residential Development at Livingston, LLC, represented by Wayne Arnold and Richard Y ovanovich, to rezone from agricultural to an RPUD. All those wishing to testifY on behalf of this application, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (All speakers were duly sworn.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Disclosures on the part of the planning commission? Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I had a conversation with Mr. Y ovanovich and asked him questions and pointed out issues that I had. And he was going to take it under advisement and we'll discuss it this mornmg. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I also talked to Mr. Y ovanovich. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: I had a conversation with Mr. Y ovanovich as well. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: He's been a pretty busy fellow this time. Anybody else besides me? I had a conversation with Mr. Y ovanovich and Mr. Arnold. And we will be talking about the same things here today. And it's involving most of the PUD standards. Mr. Vigliotti? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: And I also spoke to Mr. Y ovanovich. Page 81 161 " ,f ~', i ';'11' December 6, 2007 ,t. .'~ t CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, with that, the applicant ready for a presentation? MR. YOV ANOVICH: Good morning. For the record, Rich Y ovanovich, on behalf of the applicant. Also with me are Steve Fiterman and Dave Sturdyvin, representatives ofthe owner of the property, Wayne Arnold, Mark Minor and Kim Schlachta also are available to answer questions. On the visualizer is the -- is an aerial of the property location. This is a request to rezone 17.52 acres currently zoned agricultural to RPUD. The property is located on the east side of Livingston Road just north of Veterans Memorial, as you can see on the bottom half of the aerial. It's completely surrounded by Mediterra to the north, east and south. And further east is Tuscany Reserve. The property is designated urban residential under the comprehensive plan. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Richard, your speaker -- as short as you are, you need to pull that speaker a little closer. Oh, I'm sorry, I was thinking of Tony Pires. MR. YOV ANOVICH: There's a short end for the short guy. Is that better? Okay. I know, I've got nothing going for me. Under the urban residential fringe designation in the comprehensive plan the property owner could ask for the base density of up to four units per acre, plus various other bonuses. The request before you is for 43 units, which is essentially a density of2.57 units per acre. We worked closely with representatives -- why don't I just do this. We worked closely with representatives of the developer of Mediterra on designing what we anticipated putting on this infill piece of property. They wanted us to have products similar to what they were doing in Mediterra, so they were looking at decent size Page 82 l6 i A 4 December 6, 2007 single-family homes or decent size zero lot line product on this parcel. And if you drive up and down that street, you'd wonder why this wasn't in Mediterra in the first place. They had issues acquiring the property with the property owner. We came years later after Mediterra was designed and did acquire the property. So we're trying to do basically what's in Mediterra, since it's so close to Mediterra. More than likely, we'll be doing a zero lot line project on that property. However, we do want to have the ability to do single-family if, you know, marketing conditions dictate that we should develop this as single-family. Therefore, I need to make a couple of changes in the development standards table that were pointed out to me through meetings with various members of the planning commission. Wayne and I kind of took this project over more than halfway through and didn't catch these standards in the table. Under the single-family column, you'll see we have a side yard setback of seven-and-a-half feet and then a minimum distance between principal structures of only 10 feet. And as creative as I can be at times, I couldn't figure out how to make seven-and-a-half and seven-and-a-half equal 1 O. And then I realized well, that's usually not what you see in front of you anyway. Usually you see on single-family, you see a six-foot setback and a minimum separation of 12 feet between structures. So that's really the numbers that should be there for the side yard. It should be a six-foot setback, and then the distance between principal structures should be 12 feet on the single-family standard. Also, under maximum height your staff report says that's maximum zoned height. That wasn't clearly reflected in the table. So we need to say maximum zoned height on that table of 35 feet. And really, footnote number seven is really -- I believe it's footnote number seven, is really not necessary for this project. So footnote seven should come out. I've got that right, right? So footnote Page 83 .I tiP'" . A 1J December 6, 2007 seven should come out of that development standards table as well. One other deviation that you'll notice, we didn't ask for, is because -- which is the standard deviation that -- for cul-de-sacs greater than 1,000 feet. Do you have the master plan? You'll notice that when you measure the cul-de-sac, we were asked to move the access further north to get it away from Mediterra's access. And what that did is that created that portion of right-of-way that will put us over 1,000 feet in length. We were told when we originally went through the submittal of this that we didn't have to ask for the deviation of 1,000 feet, that it could be administratively granted. That was asked -- many of you asked that question of me as we were talking about that. And I just wanted to clarifY that on the record that yes, we can have that administratively. Ifnot, I know it's unusual, but we'd like to add that as a deviation at this point, if it's something that we need to add in the PUD. It's something you see frequently, so I hope it won't be something that would be a problem to add that now. But we were told administratively we can have that. It was questioned by several planning commissioners. I'd like to get that on the record. And frankly, it might make more sense to put it in the PUD so you're not going outside of the PUD document to have to track down the record as to maybe that administrative provision goes away in the LDC later and we may have somehow unintentionally gotten stuck with a problem. So I think that highlights the changes to the development standards, highlights the project, shows you what it's about. Wayne's going to briefly take you through the deviations we've requested. And after that, if it makes sense -- or you can ask questions any time, obviously, but if you let Wayne go through the deviation discussion we'd be available to answer any questions you may have regarding the project. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Mr. Chairman, if! may? Page 84 ,...,~ : ri ,A f'l ,," 11.., December 6, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead, Mr'!'Mutray. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: There was one issue that we discussed on Page 4 having to do with the arithmetic, and 1.4. And I spoke to you about if the lot lines we weren't sure, you weren't sure about. I know there's a minimum lot 5,000. When you do the arithmetic, you come up with 7.404 for the home sites. Do you recall that conversation? MR. YOV ANOVICH: Yes, I do. And if you look at the water management report, and that's another thing I need to bring up, you'll see that the lots are not uniform in size. The R area on the master plan is 12.51 acres. So even though we have the minimum lot standards, they're not all minimum lots. And that's going to be the difference in how we come up with this size of the development area of 12.51. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay, because my question to you at the time was what are the 5.1 additional. And I speculated what was that, clubhouse, pools, what? And you said no, they were not the amenities. So it's all of those lots, regardless of their size, that are all dedicated to housing. MR. YOV ANOVICH: Minus the preserve area, which is .82, minus the water management area, which is 2.2, and the roads, which are almost two. The difference is the development area is 12.51. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay. I wanted to get that on the record, because that makes it what otherwise would be confusing. MR. YOV ANOVICH: And I was also asked the question about, you know, the water management report says 41 lots, you're asking for 43. Well, the water management report was the current plan. However, that could change. And we would like to have the ability to do 43 units. In the project it would still be within the same development area and it would have to still meet the development standards. But right now the product we're looking at probably will only yield 41. That's why the water management report shows 41. But we would like to Page 85 16 rJecem~er 6,4007 have that flexibility that if things change we could go to the maximum of 43 units. So that explains the discrepancy between the water management report and the PUD request. Any other questions before I turn it over to Wayne to talk about the deviations? Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, is this project going to do anything for affordable housing? MR. YOV ANOVICH: The answer is yes. And honestly, I didn't know which way to handle it. I didn't know whether to put it in the PUD document or go through a separate donation. We're acceptable going either way. You know, what has become the standard has been 1,000 per unit at closing. We're fine with doing that either in the PUD document or through a separate letter with an agency that provides affordable housing. So that yes, we plan on doing that. And we didn't know which was the better way of handling it, and we're acceptable either way of handling that, however the planning commission deems appropriate. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You wait long enough because of the market, we may be paying you not to do affordable housing. MR. YOV ANOVICH: I know that's a joke and I hope that it stays to be a joke. Anything else before I turn it over to Wayne? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else before we talk to Mr. Arnold? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Nope. Thank you. MR. YOV ANOVICH: Thank you. MR. ARNOLD: Good morning. Wayne Arnold. I wanted to touch on the couple of deviations that were requested that staff did not support. Page 86 .- ~ 1, ;;" i i jf ~i:",i; f ""-"j' '= 'December 6, 2007 We requested a deviation from the standard right-of-way width for this project from 60 feet down to 40 feet. Your staff, in the various comments that we received back and forth over the past several months, we had no idea that staff was not supportive of that deviation request. And upon receiving the staff report, we're obviously concerned that they didn't support the request. We had several examples that both Rich and I and my assistant have just independently have worked on. And I came up with seven projects that I've been involved in that have been approved for that deviation down to 40 feet. Keeping in mind that we have an infill project, we're trying to go ahead and shape this in between a developed community. And we know that that standard can work. To give you an example, one of the more recent infill projects that you heard was V ornado, which was over by the Glades. We were approved with a minimum 40-foot right-of-way for that project. Rich and I were involved in a project for WCI Communities on the south end of Livingston Road called Manchester Square. That too was approved with a 40-foot right-of-way. Lands End Preserve that's off of Tower Road behind Eagle Creek, that project was approved with local roads 40 feet. Copper Cove Preserve, a project that's just north of Fiddler's Creek and off of Collier Boulevard was approved with local streets of 40 feet in width. Orange Blossom Ranch, a mixed used project in the Orangetree area was approved with a reduced right-of-way to 40 feet. Our neighboring Mediterra community was approved with private road rights-of-way of 40 feet. And our clients have developed property in the Pelican Marsh community, and that PUD as well has reductions to 40 feet for local roads. So it's a standard that we know can work and it allows some Page 87 .' 161 A 4 December 6, 2007 flexibility in design for us and for the product type that we're developing. I don't believe it's contrary to anything that's happening in the neighborhood, and it certainly doesn't become, I think, any type of safety standard for something that's serving 43 lots. So I would hope that you can support our deviation and override staffs objection to that, based on the fact that it has been approved on other cases and we can demonstrate that it can function properly. This probably will not be a public road network, it would be private, and again, not requiring the standard types of utility issues and dedications to the county. The other objection to a deviation request was to have a sidewalk on only one side of our cul-de-sac. Staff did not support that. We had offered that we would pay in lieu of for the second side of the sidewalk into the county's fund. They didn't support it. I'm not quite sure on the justification. There was discussion in the staff report that alluded to that this would become an overcrowded community. And I think our clients actually took some very recent photos. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, Wayne, I think the words were overcrowded neighborhood character and overstuffed residential neighborhood. And since staff has opined that a 2.57 unit per acre project is overcrowded and overstuffed, I would hope that we never see another project in this county above 2.57 acres. MR. ARNOLD: If! can direct your attention to the visualizer, that is a project called Terrabella, and it is in Pelican Marsh. It's a cul-de-sac street system. It shows a sidewalk on one side. That's one streetscape. It doesn't appear to be an overcrowded streetscape to me. I can give you another view. I mean, I think it looks like a typical single-family and villa neighborhood, which it is, very similar product desired to be placed in the Pezzetino Di Cielo project. Just another streetscape shot down the cul-de-sac. Closer in view of the type of attached villa product that has been Page 88 /11 6 .& (;) 6 ,. F. 1+ December 6, 2007 constructed by our clients. They're attached with privacy walls and some other attachments for the accessory structures, but it provides a different style for living on these on smaller lots. You get a lot of product, no doubt about it, for the lot. But I don't think that the reduction of the sidewalk or the right-of-way results in an overcrowded and overstuffed neighborhood that's out of character with anything else you're seeing. I think these are fine examples of very beautiful projects, and they command very high prices of neighborhoods that they're built within. I have some other examples, again, in Pelican Marsh. A Grand Isle community. Very similar product. But you get the sense that this doesn't look like an overcrowded neighborhood to me. It's a very nice single- family neighborhood. So I would hope that we could get beyond this. I think that there are other projects that have been approved with the right-of-way widths and the single side of the sidewalk. You know, frankly, a 43-unit subdivision to me shouldn't warrant a sidewalk anyway. If you notice on those pictures, those were taken yesterday in the late afternoon. I don't see another car on the streets or a person walking on them. So, I mean, the character of these neighborhoods, they're primarily seasonal, they're not heavily used, they're not typically family neighborhoods, they're more adult-oriented neighborhoods. And in this particular case, having the sidewalk on one side seems more than adequate for the streetscape. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: The pictures you've just shown us, how many units per acre are those? MR. ARNOLD: Probably in the same range. I mean, the communities vary, but Pelican Marsh overall is approved at around three units an acre, I think. I can look that up on a PUD list. But this isn't a much higher or lower density per se than --e Page 89 ..' A 1 ~eLmber 6~007 COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: So it's somewhat equal? MR. ARNOLD: Pretty similar. Mediterra adjacent to us is a good example. You'll find certain local streets where they have -- they were before the days of deviations, but their cross sections allowed certain cul-de-sacs to have sidewalks, certain cul-de-sacs had one side, certain local streets had sidewalks on one side. I don't think they were at the time required to pay into a fund, but part of our deviation was the ability to pay into the county's fund and let them use the money where it better fits the community. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I just wanted to make sure these are a fair comparison, and they are. MR. ARNOLD: I think they are. I certainly think they are. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other questions of the applicant? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I do. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And it's -- one thing. Wayne, when you show these things, what are the setbacks for the buildings? Are they comparable to this project? I mean, we have a situation here where you could put a side entrance garage 10 feet, which essentially would put it right on the edge of your utility easement. And can you plant landscape in the utility easement? MR. ARNOLD: I don't know about planting in the utility easement, but I think that generally speaking if we're going to go to the smaller lot product, you probably aren't going to find too many side-loaded garages if we go down to the 50-foot standard. It's just very impractical to provide the backing and turning movements into that. But I will tell you that for the front-loaded garages, we're going to have to be 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk. And certainly, though, within the 10 feet that would be in the front yard. I don't see a scenario where we would be placing the side-entry garage if we went Page 90 {, .: tdLU ".'~ 4 . '" December 6, 2007 that route 10 feet from the right-of-way line because of the easements that we would have to also deal with. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The product we're looking at here, what is its front setback at? MR. ARNOLD: The product you see there, I believe -- I can't say for sure. It's either 20 on the side that has no sidewalk or I believe it's 23 on the side where there is a sidewalk. I had a photo where it actually shows vehicles parked in front in the Terrabella project. Let me show you that. I didn't show you that on the visualizer. See, there are a couple of vehicles parked in the driveways on the left side of the screen. It shows that there's adequate room between the setback they provided. And I believe the standards are very similar in Pelican Marsh for what we've proposed here. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But the 23 is only at a garage? MR. ARNOLD: That's to the face of the garage, yes. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And your setback is 20 for a building? MR. ARNOLD: Correct. But if we have a sidewalk, it's required to be 23 feet. The footnote number two provides for the back of sidewalk at least 23 feet to the garage -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: From a garage door, not from a primary structure. MR. ARNOLD: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And one thing, while we're looking at number two, you have that 20 feet only ifthere's a sidewalk. Could we also add to that or back of curve, in case there's not a sidewalk? In other words, do you want 20 feet from a garage door on the side of the street without the sidewalk? MR. ARNOLD: Let me think about that for a moment and I'll give you an answer. Let me have our client contemplate that to see if that makes any material change to what they hope to do. Page 91 16' A: 4 December 6, 2007 COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Another question. So essentially we're going to be 30 feet from the center line and we have a 35-foot height that we could build to. That could be a problem, I think. Number four, footnote four on the development standards, some of the things that I'm not sure about is you can encroach into the adjoining -- you see my concern is you're allowing people to encroach if the unit owner allows you. Obviously there's no unit owner, so it would be designed with that encroachment, I assume. But what is that you're actually describing to have happen? MR. ARNOLD: I have a photo that may describe that for you, Mr. Schiffer. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Wayne, when you talk, you have to be on the speaker. It's hard to record your comments. MR. ARNOLD: Let me go back to this one. It's hard to make out, but in this location, between those two structures is a six-foot high privacy wall that provides for a courtyard on the interior of that wall that is utilized by one of those structures. There would be a like courtyard on the next side for these attached structures. That also carries forward to the rear of the structure where they might have a pool or a pool enclosure where you would have a privacy wall that could be actually on the property line, where you have the screen enclosures that come and meet on that privacy wall. That was how that's intended. It's comparable language to others you've seen. I know that Mediterra, Pelican Marsh, some of the other communities have utilized a standard that allows this encroachment language. And I think that encroachment language is there primarily so that there can be maintenance easements that are authorized for the continued maintenance of those facilities. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Why wouldn't you just put the property line essentially down the centerline of that wall or on the outside of it or something? Page 92 UtJnbe: 6, 2~)7'l MR. ARNOLD: Because in some cases the product doesn't have just a linear wall that's parallel to that property line. There may be indentations in and out where there could be the structure built actually on the property line. In other cases it would be offset from the property line. But the accessory structures typically would have that attachment, at least through the privacy wall there that would go across the property line in the front and rear. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay, that seems -- and then people would be measuring off of a property line as the wall is come across. So I mean, that seems -- MR. ARNOLD: Right, that would be -- I mean, ifthere's an easier way to say it, I'm happy to do so. I guess the intent of the language was to allow something similar to this, where you would have privacy walls and accessory structures that would be allowed to have these encroachments up to and on those property lines. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And the benefit, I guess, being that if you followed that wall with a property line, your setbacks would be subject to following that regular property line, I guess. I mean, if no one has a problem with it, I have no problem with it. The -- can you show that one picture you have that showed Mediterra, the aerial photograph? MR. ARNOLD: Sure. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And so our preserve will not be contiguous with their preserves? MR. ARNOLD: No, it's not. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Thank you. The other issue is the cul-de-sac. The concern I have is that if a fire -- emergency vehicle comes into this development, there's really not enough space for it to turn around prior to the gate. So if they are in the wrong development, they have to, I guess, go through the gate, go all the way down, turn around at the end of the cul-de-sac. Page 93 lSc(ier ~ 2007 Is there a way you could put at least aT-turn or something prior to the entrance to the gate? MR. ARNOLD: I think we've designed one. If you look closely, we have an area that's shown as a utility easement to the north property line, just north of the preserve, on our master plan. We've worked with the county to provide the potential for a pump station at that location. And you could come in and we have to provide a turnout for the county to get its utility vehicles in. So there is an opportunity, I think, to -- it would be a backing movement, but I think that would be acceptable to the fire department to make that movement. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: It looks a little small now, but if you could just do that, so that if they are in the wrong development, they can get out. If they are -- this is the right development, the lengthy cul-de-sac is not an issue. MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, I'm certain we can accommodate that. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: That's it. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein, then Ms. Caron. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: First of all, we are going to have driveways of23 feet, aren't we? MR. ARNOLD: Yes. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: All of them? MR. ARNOLD: I think the driveways are all going to be -- if you take it to the edge of the pavement, they certainly would be. But where you have a sidewalk we have to be 23 feet to our garage door to provide adequate parking. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: On this idea ofa sidewalk itself, I see no reason for you to have two of them. It doesn't make sense. First of all, because of the size of this. Second of all, you're trying to make it feel comfortable. And in doing so, I would say even if you wanted it to do for good, for the actual look and appeal of it on one side of the sidewalk is absolutely Page 94 7 ~. t:.- " Ii lJ. December 6, 2007 correct. Otherwise it gets a little bit out of line for something 42 or 43 units. MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, I think that it's a difficult thing for people to understand. But if you live in a community that does or doesn't have sidewalks, there are a large number of people who really don't want the sidewalk in their front yard. It takes away from an area that can be landscaped. And it does. There's a certain curb appeal that it's just -- it's something that some people really desire. And for those who don't want to live in a community that would have dual sidewalks, I would hope that they would go find a community that offered them, if we're allowed to have this deviation. But otherwise, you're going to go know going in when the road is constructed whether or not you have a sidewalk. And if they choose to live on the side that would have the sidewalk, that's great. If they didn't, they would have an option to live on the side that might end up with a little bit more green space. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: That's correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Arnold, could you put up that last picture that you had with the villa? I think it's in Pelican Marsh. MR. ARNOLD: Was it this one that showed -- you can't really see that. COMMISSIONER CARON: Right, that's the one. First of all, this is an attached situation. And your PUD, it's not for attached villas, correct? MR. ARNOLD: This is technically an attached villa. And we would do something -- our attached product would be very similar to this. COMMISSIONER CARON: That's not what your PUD says. MR. ARNOLD: Maybe we can look at the development standards. This would be -- Page 95 ID~L~er 6,~007 COMMISSIONER CARON: Says single-family detached and zero lot line detached. MR. ARNOLD: Right, these are zero lot line detached because the principal structures on that product are not attached. You have the accessory structures that are the attached component of that villa product. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: That's what I asked you. MR. ARNOLD: And again, ifthere's another way to express that that makes it more clear, I'm happy to do so. COMMISSIONER CARON: So in other words, this building that I'm looking at right here, that's one or two units? MR. ARNOLD: You're looking at the garage face that's there with the vegetation on it, one unit. And to the right -- COMMISSIONER CARON: To the left? MR. ARNOLD: -- on the screen is another unit. COMMISSIONER CARON: To the right is another unit. MR. ARNOLD: You see the vegetation between it-- COMMISSIONER CARON: Thank you, okay. MR. ARNOLD: And that attachment on this particular model, the attachments are the accessory structures over and across those lot lines. And you end up with a 10- foot separation between the principal structures. COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay, that's what I thought. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Are there any other questions of the applicant? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Hearing none, we'll ask for a staff report. And Melissa did this, you're kind of filling in, right? MR. BELLOWS: Correct. Yes, for the record, Ray Bellows. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any questions of staff? (No response.) Page 96 16 iii 4 December 6, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'll make it easy for you, Ray, because I know you're probably not prepared to do a presentation. Well, one may not be needed. MR. BELLOWS: I appreciate that. Just for the record, I just want to put on one note in regards to the deviations. I did discuss the deviations with Melissa Zone, who's the planner. And the deviation process is one that where the standards that are being deviated from it, if they are intended to be applicable on every instance, then those would be the standards that would be the ones that would be the normal permitted standards and not ones -- so therefore, deviations wouldn't be required. And I think it was her opinion, based on -- or her research into the project that those deviations would reduce or enlarge the footprints of the buildings and not providing for pedestrian safety. But the photos, information depicted by the applicant I think shows that they can work. And ifhe's committing to a development such as that, I don't have an objection to that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ray, I think it would be wise if we avoided terminology that we can't support in the LDC from the discussion that's used to either to be in favor or against any deviation. Overcrowding and overstuffed are not terms in the LDC defined. If there's an incompatibility issue, then fine. But I think we ought to avoid that kind of terminology. It's ambiguous and doesn't provide a clear reference to the LDC for a turn down reason, so -- any other comments of staff? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Do we have any public speakers, Ray? MR. BELLOWS: No one has registered. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: With that, there's no need for rebuttal then, thankfully. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Mark, let me just state something. I asked Wayne to check out something that doesn't make Page 97 ., " , It .::~ :: ;'''. . J ' ~ "" . 4 December 6, 2007 sense, and that is that ifthe garage was on the side without the sidewalk, there's no way you could get it closer than 25 feet to the sidewalk, so it's a moot question. I think it's actually a stupid question I asked. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You don't want to admit that for the record, Brad. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So the point is, I just don't want Wayne to waste time trying to figure that one out. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you for the clarification, sir. Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Just one thing for Mr. Yovanovich before we go to a motion. There's been a lot of reference to how well you've been working with your neighbors at Mediterra. The landscaping that you have in front of your project, the planned landscaping, will it be like Mediterra? MR. YOV ANOVICH: Oh, yes. COMMISSIONER CARON: So that as we drive down Livingston, I'm not going to know essentially where Mediterra ends and where your project picks up? MR. YOV ANOVICH: Other than signage. COMMISSIONER CARON: Other than the signage, yes. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, no other questions, we'll close the public hearing and entertain a motion. Anybody have a motion? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I'll make a motion -- COMMISSIONER CARON: I'll make a-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein, I think, was first, then we'll go to Ms. Caron. Mr. Adelstein? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I move that PUDZ-2005-AR-8416 be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, subject to staff Page 98 - . j/(; ~. c~becember 6,io07 recommendations. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, we need a second before we can go into discussion. I don't think we -- most of us here don't seem -- I don't think we're going to be supporting staff recommendations, but let's see ifthere's a second with it that way. Is there a second? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, motion dies for lack ofa second. Ms. Caron, do you have a motion? COMMISSIONER CARON: Yes, I'll make a motion for approval for PUDZ-2005-AR-8416, and with the following conditions. I believe that the deviations that were listed are appropriate and we're going to also add deviation D, which is for the 1 ,OOO-foot -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Minimum tangent. COMMISSIONER CARON: -- minimum cul-de-sacs. There is $1,000 a unit for affordable housing. They have offered to pay in lieu for the second side sidewalk. And we made certain changes to the development services -- to the development standards table. And let me try to find those. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Six-foot and-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray -- COMMISSIONER CARON: Side yards setbacks were six feet. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: For single-family. COMMISSIONER CARON: For single-family. Which would make it 12 for -- we've taken out deviation -- I'm sorry, 12 for minimum distance between principal structures. We've taken out footnote number seven. And, yes, and the height of course is zoned height. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That agrees with my notes, too. COMMISSIONER CARON: I think that was everything that we talked about. Page 99 ~, '" ,! 'II " 16decem~er 6:1007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Before we go into discussion, let's have a second. Is there a second? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: I will second that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein seconded that. Now discussion. Mr. Klatzkow, what's your issue? MR. KLA TZKOW: Just for purposes of clarity, since this is going to be a PUD stipulation, they're paying in lieu of the sidewalks. When will the payment be made? COMMISSIONER CARON: When do we normally require that, at CO? MR. KLATZKOW: It's part of the PUD, so we're making a change to what we're normally doing. It could be CO is fine, building permit is fine. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: CO is fine. MR. YOV ANOVICH: CO is fine with us. COMMISSIONER CARON: I'm sure it is. I'm asking when we normally do these things. MR. YOV ANOVICH: We would expect it at plat. COMMISSIONER CARON: Plat. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, it would be at plat approval. COMMISSIONER CARON: So at plat. MR. YOV ANOVICH: That's what we expected, yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So there's been a change to the payment in lieu of. The stipulation would be a payment in lieu of for the second sidewalk at the time of plat. Does the motion maker accept it? COMMISSIONER CARON : Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And does the second accept it? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Yes. MR. YOV ANOVICH: As part of the short comment, we should get CO, don't you think? Page 100 '1,'''' A dl . December It, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You don't want to complicate this any more. COMMISSIONER CARON: Really. MS. STUDENT-STIRLING: I also want clarification on the affordable housing payment that we use, our typical language, and that it's credited against any further fees and so on, the typical language that we use. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is that acceptable to the motion maker? COMMISSIONER CARON: Absolutely. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Second accept it? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Yes, it is. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I just want to add, you know, the one thing you have in there, the deviation on the cul-de-sac length, I would like to add into that sentence, if acceptable fire department turnaround is at the entrance. In other words, that length wouldn't be a good idea if you couldn't turn around prior to entering that. COMMISSIONER CARON: I think they've already covered that in their county easement turnaround right at the entrance, right? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The layouts that they show on this exhibit wouldn't make it. It's close. I think they can get it. I don't think it's a hardship. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Brad, the only problem you might want to consider with that is, if that was up to county staff to make that decision I think that would be fine. But when you've got a dozen different fire departments, each having a different idea of what size truck they may want to turn around, it could get rather complicated for the applicant to get it figured out. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: There is a county standard for the turnaround, and it's part of the cul-de-sac requirements. Either the 50-foot outside diameter radius or it's a T-turn, which I think would work better in this case, which they can make. Page 101 j~ .. ~'. 11 December 6, 2007 I mean, the reasons we have lengths of cul-de-sac is to prevent emergency vehicles from being trapped. And especially something that has such narrow right-of-ways, they'd have no other way to get out of there but go all the way down to the end. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, Mr. Arnold? MR. ARNOLD: Again, Wayne Arnold. I think as we stated on the record, we can and would provide an appropriate fire turnaround. And I don't know exactly how that's going to be configured. I think Mr. Strain's correct, the fire departments all have a little bit different standard. But it's not always a cul-de-sac. We've found that they've allowed hammerhead type turns and stabilized turnarounds and various things. So I think the provision for us to do it, we certainly will and can. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I have no problem with that. Ms. Caron accept it as a-- COMMISSIONER CARON: Absolutely. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does the second accept it? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN : Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anything else in this discussion phase? Mr. Vigliotti? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Just a real quick note. I'm Italian and I have a real tough time pronouncing the name. I'd like to see a shorter name, if nothing, for the sign purposes in front of the street. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Pezzetino Di Cielo -- COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'm Italian and I have a problem with it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You guys, we're on record here. Ray, did staff get all that information? MR. BELLOWS: I just want to go over it. It's being approved subject to the requested deviations by the applicant, plus the additional Page 102 16r~'" A h December 6, 2007 deviation for cul-de-sac length. Then we're also having a condition that the elimination of the sidewalk would be paid for in lieu of at the time of plat approval. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. MR. BELLOWS: And we're also to add the language to credit if there's a fee increase. Then there's a change to the development standards table for single- family structures. The side yard setback is six feet and the distance between structures is 12 feet. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. MR. BELLOWS: And you're eliminating footnote number seven. And then on the building, zoned height, we're going to make sure it says zoned height. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You missed the affordable housing. MR. BELLOWS: Affordable housing. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And it would be the standard language that's utilized. I would think for record purposes we ought to make that by letter in lieu of in the PUD. Does anybody have a preference on this panel, since the applicant offered either way? I think it would be safer to do it by letter. MR. BELLOWS: Can you say that again? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The applicant offered to make the commitment to the 1,000 stipulation by letter instead of incorporating the language in the PUD. MS. STUDENT-STIRLING: He has to do it in the PUD. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: He has to do it in the PUD? MS. STUDENT-STIRLING: We always to it in the PUD. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I know we always do. But there's been some concern over the -- MR. KLATZKOW: I've got a better ability to enforce that if it's in the PUD than if it's outside the PUD. Page 103 'i t r~! Jc OJ fit. "4 December 6, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, then that's the way it will be. Just trying to clean it up. But that's okay, we'll leave it dirty. Anybody else have anything? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, we'll call for the vote. All those in favor, signifY by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 7-0. Thank you. And we will take a IS-minute break. We'll come back at noon. I think we'll finish up easily the boat dock and we'll be closed for the day. So we'll be back at 12:00. Thank you. (Recess.) Item #8C PETITION: BD-2007-AR-12154, SAUNDRA CLANCY- KOENDARFER CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Please take your seats. Nick is leaving us. He doesn't feel he can contribute to a boat amendment. We're at a loss now. But the next petition up is BD-2007-AR-12154, and it's Saundra Clancy-Koendarfer, represented by Ben Nelson, boat dock up in Little Hickory Shores. Page 104 16 J A 4 December 6, 2007 With that, are there any disclosures on the part of the planning commission? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, how about let's swear in those that are wishing to speak on behalf of this petition. I did it backwards. (Speakers was duly sworn.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. And with that, we'll ask the applicant for a presentation. MR. NELSON: Good morning -- or good afternoon, whoops, there we go. Thank you for your patience this morning. I appreciate the job you're doing up there, and I have a real appreciation of what you do, actually. The applicant, Mrs. Koendarfer, and her husband, what their plan is here, if you have drawings that show that, is that they want to replace an existing dock that extends approximately 20 feet out into the water and is approximately 15 foot from the property line. They want to replace that with a dock that extends 25 feet out into the water and has a boat lift on the front of it. So actually, and I will put this on -- what this drawing does, this drawing shows the existing dock lighter and it shows the proposed dock right there. And also, you're going to notice here -- also you'll notice here that this is the adjacent property owner. There is the approximate location of their porch on this side. And this is kind of a line of view that would go across from this comer over across where the existing dock is. And because we've moved this other dock, this is what our recommendation to the client was, was also to move it over to where it was a conforming dock to where it was 25 feet off instead of 15 feet off. And the actual dock extends only about five feet out further than the existing dock. So instead of putting a boat lift right in front of this dock, we Page 105 qj If. , : 'e} ~ ~~ce~b:r'6, 2~7 ' decided to redo the dock, move it over, go out five more feet to get to the better water depth, and then add the lift onto it. And that's essentially it for the boat dock. I'd just like to comment on the reasons for doing this. Naples and Collier County, I think you've all been at the forefront of maintaining in front of these -- in these natural areas, and even on canals, maintaining a good benthic resource in front of these walls. And one of the ways to do it is that back in the past, even on the bays, when somebody would put a seawall in they would dig it out and dig it out to depth, and then you would have nothing in front of these seawalls. And I think that, like I said, Naples and Collier County has been at the forefront of maintaining these now. And this wall here, the existing wall has some rip-rap at the base of it. It has a nice gradual slope. It has some benthic resources, which would be some oyster shells and some other things out. And we have an aerial that really kind of shows -- I hope it shows up. I think you can see on -- maybe you can see. Really light, you can see where this -- the bar comes out right here, the actual water, edge of the water that's the deep water. You can see the rip-rap at the base of the wall, just behind the dock, and you can see this edge of this water. That's what we're trying to get out in front of, well in front of, because that's at the end of where those resources are. So anyway, the goal was to go ahead and get enough water depth to where we would have adequate water depth for the boat that they presently have and for the future boat lift, and also to move it away from the adjacent property owner so that it wouldn't be as much in the view there. And basically I think that's all I have to say, unless you have some questions. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron, then Mr. Murray. COMMISSIONER CARON: How will you affect -- by moving this dock, how will you affect those oyster beds that are there? Page 106 161 A 4 December 6, 2007 MR. NELSON: What we're doing is we're going out, we're going further out over that. The walkway will be in a different area, but going out further out is the best way to do it, because what we're trying to do is to get the boat into an area to where we won't disturb any of that. The worst problem that we have in a lot of these shallow water areas, if you put your dock in too shallow water, you know that automatically your client is going to be prop dredging, trying to move oyster shells out of the way of the boat. The boat lift is going to continually bottom out and you're going to cause turbidity and all types of stuff. So really, long-term solution, the best way to do this is to go ahead and go out to deeper water so that boat never does kick up turbidity, it allows that bottom to go ahead and be a good part of the ecosystem there. So that's our goal. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: The picture that we're looking at right now on the visualizer, the -- that's the present boat dock, is it not? MR. NELSON: Yes, sir. And there's a boat moored at the front of it. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I see that, yes. And you have a line that you put on there that shows the person's vision from the next door; is that correct? MR. NELSON: Approximately, yes. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Well, if you were to superimpose the new dock and push that boat out the distance associated with the new dock, wouldn't that line of vision be obstructed? MR. NELSON: Well, what happens is, though, we come another 10 feet this way. So if we go from here, the actual dock would be out another five feet. So that line would be right about there, would be Page 107 ':';' i~ 4 December 6, 2007 ,. exactly where the front of the boat would be. So actually, it wouldn't be any -- and that's what we showed on the previous drawing. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Well, that's what I'm relating to. The previous drawing, when -- because you didn't have it marked off for the new location. Why don't you put that back up then, please. And I'm not disagreeing with you, I just want to be clear on it because ofthe old dock. MR. NELSON: So here's the old dock right there. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: The old dock there. And you're saying to me that's being moved five feet; is that it? MR. NELSON: We've moving it actually-- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Ten feet-- MR. NELSON: Ten to 12 feet, actually, because this dock actually goes at an angle here. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay, you're making me feel more comfortable when you use the word 12, maybe even 13. Because I would say to you if you're going to be concerned for the vision of the people next door, then you need to come more center to the property. MR. NELSON: Right. And like I said, this dock comes at an angle. So it's 10 feet here, but actually if you go out here where the riparian line is, it moves over some. And if you recall, the boat -- the boat -- actually, I'm going to draw on this. The front of the boat was actually right there. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yeah, I appreciate it. That's what drew my attention to it, especially when you put a lift on there and that size boat. MR. NELSON: And so when we get over into this area, the boat would be approximately like this. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Thank you. MR. NELSON: So I don't think that -- I really think there's a good argument to be made that it doesn't worsen that part of that view. Page 108 16 be~mb~ 6, 2007 But I think really that my concern when we design these things is that I think that we need to look at the environmental challenges here first, that we really need to start taking better care of our resources. So far as dredging in these areas, really the DEP or anything, they're not going to allow you to do any dredging here, mainly because you have an option. They're going to tell you go out a little further and don't do any harm to the environment and keep this littoral zone intact right here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: The proposed deck area, it is essentially doubling in size. Is that necessary? Or could you lessen the overall extension by making that, the proposed platform, narrower? MR. NELSON: Well, you certainly could narrow it up. I would say that the waterward section of that, the waterward line, the edge of the boat lift needs to stay where it is. But I think that you could narrow that dock up. In other words, right where the boat is moored out is the important point to get to. So you could go eight feet with it, you know, and narrow it up by two feet, but it would actually be the back that moves towards the open water, if you see what I mean. Where the boat actually sits is the important part for the mooring. And maybe I can show you on the drawing. COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay, because you do actually have depth there now. I mean, all you have to do is take a look at your neighbor to the east. They're only 19 feet out and they've got a lift and they're -- MR. NELSON: But if you'll look at this aerial again, you can see -- you see this line, and I'm going to draw the line along the edge of that. Thanks. You'll see it actually curves like this. And I'm not sure what the water depth is like in this in here, but I have an idea by looking at the Page 109 '1 i, I' ft,: ",g < .t;'- Decembh 6, 2007 back end of this that it's probably not -- I know it's not as good as the water depth out here. And if you come back into here, we have a topographical survey that shows that the existing dock, the front is like .3 to .35. That's really not quite adequate for the type of boat that we visualize being moored here. And we would rather be in that minus four to minus five. And I think a lot of you, when you see these come in, that's generally the goal, is to be at that minus four to minus five. Especially when you have a boat lift, and that boat lift cradle itself can be anywhere from 10 inches thick to 12 inches thick to support that boat. COMMISSIONER CARON: Well, again, one of the things we were trying to protect in these waterways here, because we're in a shallow backwater area, is that we don't have boats that are too large for the backwaters. MR. NELSON: Right. COMMISSIONER CARON: And so by moving out to a depth that will just allow you to have a larger boat is not a goal for this panel or, you know, should it be. We shouldn't be lessening our standards just to accommodate larger boats in an area where it may not be appropriate. MR. NELSON: I agree. And I don't think that this lessens the standards at all. I really don't. COMMISSIONER CARON: I'm comfortable with what I see. MR. NELSON: Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: This is -- waterway is 640 feet wide there? MR. NELSON: It's 640 feet, approximately. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And you're looking at 37 feet. Have your neighbors complained? MR. NELSON: I think we have had a complaint about the view. That's why I mentioned the view. The neighbor to the east has made a complaint about the view there. And that's why I put this drawing up. Page 110 161 A 4 December 6, 2007 And I know that there's concern, and I'm not going to say that the neighbor shouldn't be concerned. I mean, neighbors have a right to be concerned, so I don't want to -- I just want to show you on this drawing, this is their boat dock right here. This is different for me here. Sorry. There we go. This is their boat dock right here. This is their porch and their lanai right here. And I think their concern was is that because if we went straight out with this dock right here the way it was, it was going to get further into this view. But actually -- and I'm not sure that they were aware of it or not, they may have well been aware of it, but we are moving it over, too. So I think the line of view -- I think a good argument is to be made is that because of that, we're going to stay approximately in the same line of view as we are now. And if you'll notice right here, we have some photographs, but right in here, the reason that we don't crowd this over, right in here there's a lot of vegetation. Pretty substantial vegetation right along this site here that pretty much blocks this view here, the upland view. So that's why we drew this line across the bow ofthis. This one is probably more of the concern. And because of where their own boat dock is right here, we kind of drew the line across from where that blocked that view. So I don't know if that's a fair representation or not, but it's the best I could come up with. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Are there any other questions? Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And Ray, this is kind ofto you, is that given them the larger deck area, it would be nice if they would cover it. There's nothing we do today that gives them the ability to put a boathouse cover on it or something; isn't that right? MR. BELLOWS: That's correct. Page 111 161 A " fi. ' /~ December 6, 2007 COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So they would have to come back if they wanted to do that? MR. NELSON: Absolutely. And then I think the county's criteria on boathouses and the setbacks on boathouses and the criteria for view really comes into play majorly then. So I would see little or no chance of that happening. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other questions of the applicant? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is there a staff report? THE COURT REPORTER: May I have your name, please? MR. NELSON: Oh, I'm sorry. For the record, Ben Nelson. MS. CASERTA: Hi. Ashley Caserta, Senior Planner for the record. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Did you cut your hair? MS. ASHTON: Yes, I did. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You look totally different. It looks very nIce. MS. ASHTON: Thank you. No report. Staff does recommend approval. If you have any questions for me. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any questions of staff? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, thank you very much. Ray, do we have any public speakers? MR. BELLOWS: Yes, we have one registered speaker. James C. Welch. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Welch, if you could approach one of the podiums. Thank you for your patience today. I'm sorry the schedule got changed around. MR. WELCH: Thank you for seeing me. I appreciate it. THE COURT REPORTER: Were you sworn in? Page 112 .,",,' J' A',J, ,;i~ bDl~e~ber 6, 2007 MR. WELCH: No, I wasn't. (Speaker was duly sworn.) MR. WELCH: I have three current pictures, one, two, three, that will make some sense. And I also took the liberty of taking the Collier appraiser's. I'm not a public speaker, but I'm rather confused why a 37-foot protrusion is necessary when the maximum permitted protrusion is 20 feet as the norm. As the three pictures demonstrate, in my opinion, you know, the docks all along the side are not protruding 37 feet, and they're considerably large boats connected to them, as my neighbors, which has a V -bottom boat and doesn't have the need to be out that far. In my opinion, this will leave -- it will have a major impact on my westerly view and sunsets I look forward to. As I see it, there will be a boat hoisted on a lift 25 to 37 feet out in the water, which I think also compromises the existing customary channel of navigation, which is along the seawall. I don't understand why it's necessary to hoist the boat 25 feet from the seawall, as the pictures show. Other boats are not. I would appreciate clarification on the purpose. I haven't gotten it with the depth. I'm asking members of the board to consider the relevance of size of dock versus depth of water. It appears to me that three-and-a-half feet at low tide is plenty of depth for a vessel. I'm also questioning why depth was measured at my property line, as shown in Nelson's rendering, rather than petitioner's proposed site of construction. To this end, I ask that the present character and simplicity ofthe neighborhood be preserved. I just don't understand the need for a boat lift 25 feet from the seawall. I do not see on the documents what the total elevation of the boat lift will be out there, 25 to 37 feet out. I'm also concerned that at a future date another lift could be installed along the IS-foot walkway, which would further impede our Page 113 16/n '.' December 6, 2007 VIew. This graph paper, I represented a foot by each block, and I actually drew it out exactly the way it comes out to show as it would be rendered, because I couldn't understand the Nelson Marine rendering per square footage. So I went and did one myself. And as you can see, there's a considerable impact on view. I would just ask if this must be approved, I'm going to request that the dock be placed further west of my property in preserving my westerly view, which I cherish greatly and why I chose to be at this location. It seems this raises the bar for allowed protrusions. There are three other protrusions in the bay. One is a public dock, and two of them are for a condo association at the end of the bay. Other than that, they don't protrude out this far. For one boat on a lift, it seems like a considerable amount of protrusion into the bay. I took the picture also, the boat that's there drafts approximately six inches. I draft approximately one foot with my boat. And it's no difficulty, you know, being close to the seawall as I am. That boat right there is a 17- foot boat that I have, and it draws a foot of water. Pontoon boats typically draw six inches of water. And I would ask that the board consider either relocating it further west or maybe by the side of the dock, rather. But the depth, I question how the depth would come about, because I stand in the water out there. Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sir, I have a question. You had -- the last photograph you showed, I mean, I'm trying to figure out where it is, because the -- maybe you could show it, it was number three, you had a number three up in the comer of it. There it is. That picture shows a canal. Where is that in relationship to this facility? MR. WELCH: The canal starts about four or five homes down. My neighbor is still on the bay, as I am. Page 114 i 6' . Dec~ber 6, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, I was confused. I remember seeing the diagram that shows a 640-foot deep bay, and that's why I couldn't figure out where the canal occurred. Are there any other questions of the gentleman? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I do, Mark. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Is your concern -- in other words, there's a couple dimensions that are important. One is to the edge of the dock itself and then one is to the outside, you know, edge of the lift. Is your concern more to the edge of the dock or the whole thing out to the outside edge? What he's asking for, his dimensions are to the outer edge of that lift, which is 37 feet. If he pulled the whole thing coming in, what kind of a number would make you comfortable? MR. WELCH: Well, if the issue is the depth of the boat, if it was on the side of the dock, that would be perpendicular to the seawall. That would be one issue. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Correct. MR. WELCH: But I don't understand the need to go out that far. I'm confused, because I stand in the water, I know it's deep enough. I have -- I know what my area is. And by the county's picture, I know that there's that band that goes around it, goes against the seawall, but I also know that if you look at that, that's what I'm going to have to look forward to in reality, not that sketch that I saw from Nelson Marine. And I drew that out, hand sketched one foot for every block. And that's what I'm going to be looking at, 37 feet out, God knows how high in the water -- out of the water. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But how many people -- it looks like the existing boat is docked on the outside edge of their dock now. MR. WELCH: Yes, but it's in-- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: It doesn't have a lift, it's in the Page 115 16' A Deltnber 6, 2007 water, right? So your concern is even lifting that boat up, it would lift it into your view. MR. WELCH: Right. Well, it's going to be one more obstruction. There's going to be a protected walkway that's going to have a rail on it. Then there's going to be a dock that's going to be 10 by 20 out. And then on top of that there's going to be a hoisted boat that's going to be 25 to 37 feet out into the water, and that totally blocks my view. I don't know where somebody thinks it doesn't block my view; it's apparent from this sketch that I took the time to draw. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And Ray, from our past LDC work, isn't that boat also able to have a cover on it now? MR. WELCH: It has a cover. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But I mean, where we came up with regulations on covers that are supported by pilings. So essentially wouldn't this be allowed even on top of that boat that there's a cover sitting out there? MR. BELLOWS: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So it's worse than you think. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other questions of the gentleman? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, sir. MR. WELCH: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. By the way, Mr. Klatzkow, do we have to keep the papers he's shown for record? I think we do. MR. KLA TZKOW: I think you do. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: If you could give them to the court reporter here, she'll make sure they're filed. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Shouldn't we accept them as evidence? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. We each haven't got a copy, Bob, so let's just leave it like it is. Page 116 " Dece~ber if 2007 MR. NELSON: Mr. Chairman, would I be allowed to make a couple more comments? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sure, you can have rebuttal. MR. NELSON: So far as the water depth, I think a lot of you remember when it used to be -- water depth used to be a source of contention, the neighbor would say this, we would say that. So that's why you started requiring for us to get the staff is to get a certified surveyor to come in and do the water depths on there. You see this bathymetric survey actually has the water depths on both sides, in other words. And what they did, the reason that they put the lines on both sides here is so that you could kind of connect the dots and come across here and see where those lines are. So it kind of takes the dispute out of it of what the water depth is. And so far as the other docks in the area -- I'm going to change this again -- you have this drawing, too. This kind of shows kind of an example of the docks, just a sampling of the docks. From my experience as a marine contractor, a lot of the times these older docks that have been put at 20-foot -- and these don't include the lifts on here, these are just where the dock is, the protrusion of the dock, and these are fairly accurate measurements here. And you'll see that a lot of them are 21, 23, 21, they're all in that area right there. A lot of times in the past people have just put the docks in at that 20-something feet, rightly because they don't want to go through this variance process. They come to us or come to somebody else and they say, what can we put in? Well, you can go out 20 foot or you can pay another $2,000 and whatever and we'll take a shot at getting you out there with a boat lift. Some people choose not to do that. Some people choose just to go ahead and do a walk-around dock in the shallow water and deal with that shallow water. Page 11 7 ) "":- c: /;1 December 6, 2007 I quite frankly don't think that that's the best case scenario. I think the best case scenario is to get these boats into deeper water, because the resource -- I believe that the resource is very important. Not that the view and everything else isn't important, but most people have a boat and a dock and a boat lift behind their house that they look at too from behind their house as well. And I understand how when you want to look towards the sunset and you want to look across your neighbor's property that that's a concern, but I think that shouldn't get in the way of somebody's right to adequately have safe, reasonable access. And I think that if you ask your staff if this is safe and reasonable access and a reasonable request as part of the criteria that you've set out, I think that you'll find it will be. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein, then Mr. Murray. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: What is the depth that you have it at now? MR. NELSON: It's probably -- it's at a bit of an angle to the shoreline, so I'd say it was at an average of a minus 4.5. What that translates into is about at low tide, it's about four-and-a-half feet deep at low tide at the front of the dock. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: And at full tide what is it? MR. NELSON: At full tide it would probably be six foot. If you get a foot-and-a-halftide change, it would probably be six-foot deep at high tide. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Thank you. MR. NELSON: And so far as the channel also, it's fairly deep. I think it's fairly deep across there. The gentleman's right, people have a habit of hugging the shoreline as they go along there. But there is no marked channel in this area, mainly because it stays so deep. This is what I would consider to be a -- you wouldn't call it a manmade waterway, it's a man-altered waterway. Years ago, in the Page 11 8 1~ I';'~ December 6, 2007 late] 950's, early] 960's, they went around the area and in some areas they dug this out by crane. You can see that by aerial photo. It's kind of interesting, really. And so right now the whole area's taken 40 to 50 years to kind of recover environmentally from that. And so what our goal here is just to try to do something that doesn't hinder that process. And although we would be -- I have no objection at all to moving it further away to the west away from the client here, I have no objection to doing that at all, as long as we don't encroach in the 25 feet from the other side. I'm sure my applicant has no objection to doing that. But it will make it go towards the other neighbor we haven't heard from, but they're not here, so I can't speak for them, that's for sure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Mr. Nelson, I think you said something about improving safety or making sure that there was safety associated with -- MR. NELSON : Yes. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Does that mean that when the original community was developed that the 20- foot docks were not safe? MR. NELSON: Well, I think that what the goal is to have safe and reasonable access. And because of the 20-foot dock, when you put a 20-foot dock in there, if it's too shallow, if you don't have a boat lift, if you don't have proper access, your boat sits on the bottom or whatever. I don't think it's considered safe access. And, you know what, there's a good argument to be made that if you're not in that deep water depth, and as long as you're able to stay out of a navigational channel, I think that you've got safe access. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Sir, I'm not going to disagree with you necessarily, but I will say that one of the pictures that we saw looking down to that canal seemed to be a very large vessel behind the vessel that was just in front. And I would say that if the Page 119 ~: t.. ~'A ~ 'f-;;; i , .."- ,[ . . ece~be 6, 2007 community were planned with the 20-foot there, I recognize there's a great deal of width in the bay, but a vision -- you know, somebody's view is important, and the community character is important. And ordinarily I wouldn't take umbrage, but we have somebody who's indicating it's directly impacting. And even I noted that it looked to me like when you put that other vessel out there, and you made a statement earlier on indicating the vessel they want to put there, which means that they have in mind something other than the vessel we're looking at right now -- MR. NELSON: Sure, most people do. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: -- which would be considerably larger. MR. NELSON: It could be. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Presumably. So I don't know, I thought that these were safe the way they were. Ijust caught that and wondered about your choice of the word there. MR. NELSON: And towards the other end of the canal there, where the picture was taken down there in the canal, the character of that canal changes. As you get down further towards the mouth of that canal, the water depth increases towards the seawall. As you can see by the drawing, the water depth increases towards the seawall, it gets deeper, so you're able to come back in there further. Also, as you get to that canal, you're limited. That canal is only 80 feet wide. You're limited to 20 feet, and that's all you'll ever be able to do. So that's what they have to live with. And being a manmade canal then towards that end, you're able to dredge there. So there's a lot of reasons why it changes as it gets down towards that way right there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Adelstein? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: From the point of land to the water, how far out would it be for three feet of water? MR. NELSON: Right now the dock is 20 feet out, and it's at 3.5 Page 120 161 A December 6, 2007 feet. So the existing dock. So right now if she just left the boat the way it is, she's in three-and-a-halffeet of water. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: How long would it be if it was just three feet? MR. NELSON: It appears -- it says right here that it's at minus two point -- see, it drops off rather rapidly. At 15 feet out it's minus 2.3. At 20 feet out it's minus 3.5, so you kind of split the difference in between there. Approximately 18 feet. Now, minus three, by the way, minus three, if you ask the department of environmental protection, minus three is the minimum water depth that they would consider adequate water depth. And so very seldom -- COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: It is adequate. I've been using it too. MR. NELSON: Yeah, it's very minimal adequate water depth, but -- and it depends on the draft of your boat. Generally, and I think that in the environmental community, generally minus four, like I said, a minus four to minus five is the usual, and it is the best thing for the environment. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, are there any other questions? Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: One thing right now. They couldn't put a lift on the existing dock right now, because that would add dimension to it and would violate the 20 feet, correct? MR. NELSON: We would still be here. Yeah, we would still be here to get a variance for that. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So it's not like we're just -- you know, the rebuilt dock is quite a bit bigger because of that lift. The lift lifts the boat into a view that it may not normally be in. And because of the potential ofthe covers that we recently approved, it could be a permanent structure sitting out there. I'm done. Thank you, Mark. Page 121 1 ~ , , December 6, 2007 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else have any questions of anyone at this point? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, Mr. Nelson. Ray, we're done with public speakers? MR. BELLOWS: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We'll close the public hearing and entertain a motion. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'll make a motion. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead, Mr. Schiffer. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Move to deny. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion's been made to deny, motion's been seconded. Is there discussion? The only consideration I would have thought is the gentleman suggested that if they could move this dock further away from his house, it might help the situation. And I think they could move it further away, based on the plan that's presented. I saw that as a positive. So that was my comment. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Mark, can I respond to that? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sure. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: He can only move it over five more feet. And even looking at it, I was trying to sketch it, he could really only pull it in five more feet. So moving it over five feet and bringing it down to 32 still doesn't help, I think, the issue with the neighbor. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: That's right. MR. NELSON: But I would ask what the option for the client is. Does he not have the ability to have a boat lift? Is that what the commission is telling us? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Based upon the 20 feet, probably not. I mean, nobody else does past the 20 feet. Page 122 T!~, f A 4 Decemoer 6, 2007 MR. NELSON: Yeah, there's a whole county full of people that do, actually. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But I mean on the wall of this thing. I think there was another thing that Donna said true, too, is that this isn't an area where they really want to go out of the way to keep getting bigger and bigger boats into it. So that's another factor. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other comments on the motion? There's been a motion made to deny. It's been seconded, there's been discussion. All those in favor of the motion, signifY by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All those opposed? COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Motion carries 5-2. Okay, with that, we will end. Thank you all for attending today. Item #9 OLD BUSINESS Next order of business is old business. Do we have any old business? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I just want to kind of bring one thing up is -- and Ray, we've got to be wasting a lot of money on delivery of things. I'm getting letters, I'm getting fellows to the door with one piece of paper. Page 123 161 A 4 December 6, 2007 Could we do this, could you organize how you update data and poll the members to see which they prefer? And here's what happens: I print out an agenda that comes in e-mail, then two days later there's a guy handing me one at the door. So we didn't achieve anything other than the waste, that guy's expense. So isn't there some way you could poll the board and see what's the preferable method of update for different members? And also, I think when you revise the agenda, I think revising it like you did here, revision two, is a good idea. But I think if you could just put the date that you revised it, that would be better than numbering them one, two, three. So I just really feel bad getting a letter, getting a guy and getting an e-mail at the same time. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer, rather than have to have staff make phone calls and correspondence back and forth, why don't we just ask it? As far as I'm concerned, if we were to establish a policy, say 10 pages or less it becomes e-mailed, 11 pages or more you send it out, unless one of us indicates otherwise. Does that work for everybody here? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Works for me. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That will save you polling everybody. MR. BELLOWS: That will help. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MR. BELLOWS: I appreciate it. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Good. Thank you, Mark. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is there any other old business? Item #10 NEW BUSINESS Is there any new business? Page 124 16/ i~ December 6, 201h (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Hearing none, I'll ask for a motion to adjourn. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: So moved. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made, seconded by Mr. Midney. All in favor? Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. COMMISSIONER ADELSTEIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We're adjourned. Thank you all. **** There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 12:35 p.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION L\j I fAA (1\ \ ?A~t~ MARK P. STRAIN, Chairman These minutes approved by the Board on ~ ~ I! - o'i? as presented ;,/ or as corrected , TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC. BY CHERIE' NOTTINGHAM. Page 125 16 I A J~nua;i 2008 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Naples, Florida, January 9, 2008 RECEIVED FEB 0 1 7008 De~);l~Jv~~~~Q:n~;s~~l:~s LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Advisory Committee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 3:30 P,M, in REGULAR SESSION in Conference Room #610 in the Collier County Community Development and Environmental Services Center, 2800 N, Horseshoe Drive, Naples, members present: CHAIRMAN: William Varian Charles Abbott James Boughton Clay Brooker David Dunnavant Marco Espinar Blair Foley George Hermanson Reed Jarvi Thomas Masters Robert Mulhere Dalas Disney (Excused) David Bryant (Absent) :sc, Corres: IG ( ,A-6 ALSO PRESENT: Joe Sehmitt, CDES Administrator Marlene Stewart, Staff Liaison Judy Puig, Operations Analyst, CDES Phil Gramatges, Public Utilities Nick Casalanguida, Transportation Services Susan lstenes, Director, Zoning & Land Development Review Bob Dunn, Interim Director, Building Review & Permitting Dept. Mike DeRuntz, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Dept. ,:ate: :em' Copies to , ,J 1 '6 I Ai 5 January 9, 2008 I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chairman William Varian at 3:30 PM, A quorum was established, II. Approval of Agenda Mr. Mulhere moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Masters. Carried unanimously, 8-0. III. Approval of Minutes Mr. Brooker moved to approve the Minutes of December 5,2007 as submitted. Second by Mr. Espinar. Carried unanimously, 8-0. IV. Staff Announcements/Updates C. Public Utilities Update - Phil Gramatges · Public Utilities Master Plan is in development · Capital projects will be discussed on Monday · Anticipated presentation to the Committee and the BCC in May, 2008, VI. Old Business C. Presentation of Revised Language - Hydraulic Modeling Fee - Phil Gramatges · Money is needed in order to perform hydraulic modeling · Modeling is required to assure capacity at point of connection · Proposed placing cost for Hydraulic Modeling into Fee Schedule instead of during SOP or PPL stage · Fee is $1,000 per model; cost to County is approximately $750 per model · Threshold: projects with less than 5 ERe's will not need to be modeled (3:40PM - Reed Jarvi arrived) Mr. Masters moved to approve the Hydraulic Modeling Fee. Second by Mr. Foley Discussion ensued, Opposition to the fee was expressed, Motion was defeated, 8-No, I-Yes, with Mr. Foley infavor. Mr. Gramatges stated the Hydraulic Modeling Fee was dedicated to the Public Utilities Department, while the other fees were earmarked for CDES. Mr. Foley presented problems relative to commercial construction regarding irrigation and structure usage flow amounts using the new meter form. There is apparently a second version in use that the Committee did not approve, Mr. Gramatges stated he would investigate the situation and contact Mr. Foley directly, (3:48PM - David Dunnavant arrived) IV. Staff Announcements/Updates: R Transportation Division Update - Nick Casalanguida . 1-75/Everglades IJR ("Interchange Justification Report") has been placed on the agenda Cor review at the next Bee meeting 2 161 ~....., , ;"'\ January 9;-1008 · The Omnibus Bill appropriated $750,000,00 to commission a year-long study to evaluate and select a location for the interchange -- Everglades, DeSoto and Big Cypress will be considered Chairman Varian asked about potential lane closures during the anticipated Pine Ridge Road construction, Mr. Casalanguida stated there would be closures during off-peak and "off' hours, V. LDC: A. Amendment Request - 2008 Special Cycle Ia - presented by Douglas Lewis, Esq. Florida Rock Industries, Inc. (Staff requested Amendment) There is an exception in the LDC concerning acquisitions and condemnation by government, or dedication to government. The purpose of the amendment is to add language that clarifies that the exception also applies when a private party is acting on behalf of government, and allows severance of TDR (Transfer Development Rights) Credits, The County will save money since it will only pay for the land and not for severance damages, The Amendment was approved by EAC after modification to strike all references to "public purpose," Mr. Mulhere moved to approve the Amendment. Second by Mr. Brooker. The Motion was carried, 9-Yes, I-Abstention (Mr. Hermanson abstained due to conflict of interest.) IV. Staff Announcements/Updates: A. CDES Update - Joe Schmitt, Administrator - CDES Mr. Schmitt stated the new Fee Schedule was in effect. He asked if there were any issues the Committee Members wished to discuss, Chairman Varian stated the fee charged for garage door replacements had been $53,00 but was now $103,00, He did not remember the Committee approving this increase, Additionally, there was a significant difference in permit fees for identical projects in April and December, 2007 - the projects' values and review fees were the same, no impact fees were involved, yet the permit fee was significantly greater for the December project. Mr. Schmitt stated that he would consult with the Building Department to see if fees had been changed and why, Speakers: Brenda Talbert, Executive Vice President, Collier Building Industry Association, asked about the process for dealing with problems resulting from the Fee Schedule increases, and how to advise the Association's members as to the best way to deal with this issue, Bob Dunn, Acting Building Director, stated he should be contacted and would handle each situation on a case-by-case basis, Bob Joslin, Garage Doors of Naples, stated he recently applied for three permits and had been charged the increased fee, He also asked if the Express Permit Books would be re-instituted to reduce both paper work, and the time involved, Joe Schmitt stated if there was a scrivener's error in the Fee Schedule, he would bring it to the Board's attention so the Ordinance could be amended, 3 161 A 5 January 9, 2008 Also discussed was the application of a proportionate scale to proposed renovations of older properties, Joe Schmitt stated the Building Code allows for proportionality when related to improvements and accessibility, The Land Development Code mandates a renovated structure must be brought up to current Code standards, The Committee pointed out there are situations where it is not structurally possible or economically feasible to conform completely to the Code, Joe Schmitt stated it would be necessary to amend the LDC and asked if a "Task Force" could be set up to assist him and the LDC Subcommittee in preparing an Amendment (4,' fOPM - Charles Abbott arrived) There was further discussion, The Committee suggested that building improvement costs could be separated from site improvement costs, the threshold requiring full compliance to Code might not be triggered, The architectural standards are the problem. Mr. Hermanson moved to recommend that the Development Services Director ask the BCC for direction for Staff to draft an LDC Amendment to allow for more flexible provisions for building and site improvements. Second by Mr. Jarvi. Mr. Mulhere suggested adding "for more flexibility and greater definition to the standard provisions." Mr. Hermanson amended his Motion to include the suggested language. Carried unanimously, I J - O. Bob Dunn stated he had spoken with Staff who recommended changing the Fee Schedule to allow for a minimum permit fee, Convenience permits would be instituted until the BCC could approve amending the Fee Schedule, D. Fire Review Update (Note: Neither Mr. Riley nor a representative from his department was present, but reports entitled "Summary of Plan Review Activity," and "Fire Plan Review" were included in the packet of information provided by Staff.) Bob Dunn stated a Fire Review Task Force Workshop was scheduled for March 18th from 9:00AM to 12:00 Noon, VI. Old Business: A. Floodplain Management Plan 2008 Update Mike DeRuntz, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Department, stated the BCC approved the Floodplain Management Plan in December. The Floodplain Management Planning Committee will review items that could affect either the Growth Management Plan or the Land Development Code, Proposed Amendments would be brought to DSAC for review before tinal presentation to the BCe. Committee members questioned the composition of the Floodplain Management Planning Committee, There were members from government as well as the general public, 4 I6iA 5 January 9, 2008 Mr. Jarvi moved to recommend to the BCC and the County Manager that two professional civil engineers (non-governmental) be included as members of the Floodplain Management Planning Committee. Second by Mr. Mulhere. Carried unanimously, 11-0. VII. New Business: B. DSAC Applications - Review/Endorsement Chairman Varian stated there were two vacancies on the Developmental Services Advisory Committee and two applications had been received for these vacancies, The terms for Brian Jones and Fred Reischl had expired, Mr. Masters moved to accept the applications of Laura Spurgeon DeJohn and Patrick G. White to fill the current DSAC vacancies and to recommend approval to the BCe. Second by Mr. Foley. Carried unanimously, 11-0. C. Selection of 2008 DSAC Chairman Mr. Masters moved to nominate William Varian as Chairman. Second by Mr. Mulhere. Motion carried 10-Yes, I-Abstention. (Chairman Varian abstained.) Mr. Foley moved to nominate Thomas Masters as Vice Chair. Second by Mr. Mulhere. Motion carried IO-Yes, I-Abstention (Mr. Masters abstained.) (4:30 - Bob Mulhere lefi) VI. Old Business: C, Policies and Procedures for Change-out Sheet - Susan Istenes, Zoning Director Ms. Istenes presented the Staff policy for implementation of the fee for Sheet Trade- Outs, Copies of the policy were distributed to the Committee. Members commented that this particular policy actually saved money for contractors. VIIl. Member Comments: Clay Brooker stated an issue regarding outdoor seating was presented during the last LDC cycle, County Attorney Jeff Klatzkow had presented an update to the Committee in November and stated revisions to the LDC noise ordinance were to be brought back before the Committee for review in December. Clay recently read that the Planning Commission was scheduled to vote on proposed changes regarding outdoor seating, Hc was contacted by a Planning Commissioner asking for DSAC's comments and he informed that individual DSAC had yet not seen the proposcd changes, Mr. Espinar moved to request that the Planning Commission forward the changes for outdoor seating for review by DSA C prior to presentation to the BCC for approval. Second by Mr. Hermanson. Chairman Varian stated the changes should have been presented via the usual route - to DSAC, then to EAC and finally to the Planning Commission, Chairman Varian calledfor a vote. Carried unanimously, 10-0, IX. Next Meeting Dates: February 6, 2008; March 5, 2008; April 2, 2008; May 7,2008 5 161 A f."":'j ,,' i;.:.;::i! " ia~uary 9, 2008 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 4:45 PM. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE LA') /^"- "/ Wilha~arian, Chairman These Minutes were approved by the Board/Committee on W(l./.a'1 &, clbO'if as presented X, ' or as amended , 6 16 I A~ 6 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ADVISORY COUNCIL (EMSAC) ,~ ,." , , '"-n December 19,2007 NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC Second Floor Education Center Located: 120 Goodlette Road North District I Commission District - Victoria DiNardo, Present .' ,I,... 'If District 2 Commiss~on District -- Jeffrey Allbritten, Chairman, Present Fiala .,y'y,_ _ Dlstnct 3 CommissIOn Dlstnct - John ValentJ, Absent Halas ..~_ .-- District 4 Commission District - Nancy Lascheid, Vice Chairman, Prese~enning- " ',&, '-, -= Dlstnct 5 Commission Dlstnct - Vacant . ,oyle . 62~ At Large -- Johan Domenie, Absent Coletta,. -..' .' ..--- At Large - Dr. Douglas Lee, Absent Naples Community Hospital- Gail Dolan, Present City of Naples Police and Emergency Services - Jim McEvoy, Chief, Present Collier County Health Department - Kathleen Marr, Present City of Marco Island Fire/Rescue -- Michael Murphy, Chief, Present Collier County Fire Chiefs Associations - Rob Pottieger, Assistant Chief, Absent Physician's Regional Medical Center -- Dr. Jeffrey Panozzo, Present Collier County Sheriffs Office - Commander Bill Rule, Absent Minutes from this month were sent to a transcriber. Please see the 104 page transcribed minutes. After the recording stopped, the only thing discussed was the schedule for 2008, Considering there was no longer a quorum, it was decided to wait until the January meeting to adopt the schedule, The next meeting will be held on January 30, 2008, Respectfully Submitted, Jennifer Florin AQopted (including transcribed minutes) on: / :> -~- ~- C- /' ':.... '>c/--C:;,'f' .. /:> " " ~/~., /y/ . / ///1-' /, / m~~ . / - /." - / ./.. /// - / //::',/;< (/." .'-/, . Chairman or Member Representative Mise, COtTeS: Iv I Pi ~ Date: Item I: Copies to: J 1 2 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MINUTES OF THE 3 COLLIER COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 4 ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING 5 6 DATE: December 19, 2007 7 LOCATION: Neighborhood Health Clinic 120 Goodlette Road North Naples, FL 8 9 10 APPEARANCES: 11 Chief Jeff Page 12 Jeff Allbritten, Chairman 13 Nancy Laschied, Vice Chairman 14 Chief Michael Murphy 15 Chief Jim McEvoy 16 Gail Dolan 17 Kathleen Marr 18 Dr. Jeff Panozzo 19 Victoria DiNardo 20 Dr. Robert Tober 21 Jennifer Florin 22 TRANSCRIBED BY: JOYCE B. HOWELL, NOTARY PUBLIC GREGORY COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC, 23 2650 Airport Road South Naples, FL 34112 24 239,774,4414 25 18~1 A'~6 1 1 (The pledge of allegiance was recited in 2 unison.) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NANCY LASCHEID: All right, The chair will entertain motion to adopt the agenda, if you'll take a look at that, please. Oh, we can1t pass (inaudible). They donrt have a quorum. We can1t even pass the minutes. October -- okay, Well, then, the chair is going to make the decision, since the consultant to the master plan is the old business you're going to review next is that what yourre going to talk about next? CHIEF PAGE: Well, I will if you want me to do that. NANCY LASCHEID: I'd like to wait until we have a quorum. CHIEF PAGE: Sure, NANCY LASCHEID: And thank you, (Inaudible) voices. CHIEF PAGE: They should be here in just a (inaudible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Sounds like it. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Coming up the stairs. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay, 16, 2 / A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: ready (inaudible), JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Some of us can't (Inaudible) we're read. NANCY LASCHEID: I defer to the chair. JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Please, (inaudible) chair. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yes, JEFF ALLBRITTEN: (Inaudible) don't have the ability to read e-mails, so I shouldn't be able to run the meeting either. NANCY LASCHEID: Okay, We're going to (inaudible) you one more time. JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Okay, Adoption of the agenda. I understand we have a quorum now that certain lagging members are here. So do I hear a motion to adopt __ MIKE MURPHY: Motion to approve, JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Okay, UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I'll second, JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Okay, Any discussion? All in favor? (Chorus of ayes,) JEFF ALLBRITTEN: All opposed? 16/ 3 ,n 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (No response.) JEFF ALLBRITTEN: All right, I think you1ve had a chance to review the minutes from last month's meeting? Do I hear a motion to adopt the minutes? JIM MCEVOY: So moved, NANCY LASCHEID: Second, JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Any discussion? Any errors or omissions? Okay. Hearing none, all in favor of approving the minutes, say aye. (Chorus of ayes,) JEFF ALLBRITTEN: All opposed? (No response.) JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Okay, Chief? CHIEF PAGE: Sure, The master plan -- you should have in our packets two different letters, one from Commissioner or Chairman Colleta, and the other from, I believe, the chair of the productivity committee, John Barlow (phonetic). Obviously, both those letters indicate that EMSAC is going to have their own ability to work with them on that master plan. Now, everybody should have a copy, correct, 16 f !J~ ~o 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 every board member? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Correct. CHIEF PAGE: So I don't know if any of you have any questions about anything in the plan that I can answer today, but I wanted to find out from the chair how you would like to proceed, you know, from this point forward on that, JEFF ALLBRITTEN: You're looking to me to make that determination? CHIEF PAGE: Well, or your board, but JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Right, CHIEF PAGE: if there's anything that we can do to kind of -- if there1s any research you1re wanting or -- 11m sure Mike has something. JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Absolutely, MIKE MURPHY: Chief, just a couple of quick questions. Have there ever been any revisions to this whatsoever in reference to they left out, like, the area toward the Isles and some of those that we have discussed previously? Have they revised this in any way, shape or form? 5 1 (51 Af~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CHIEF PAGE: Not to my knowledge, no. MIKE MURPHY: Okay. CHIEF PAGE: I mean, their work is done when that came out. MIKE MURPHY; Okay, CHIEF PAGE: There was one page, I believe it was like page 37, that was revised on the financial side of it because we had to provide them some additional information. It had to do with revenue fees and things of that nature that they were confused about. But I believe the copies that you have is the revised page. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. MIKE MURPHY; And then in reference to the actions by this board, they have made some recommendations for additional positions and items like that. Does this board need to address those things prior to your budget, and if so, when would you like to discuss that in front of this group? CHIEF PAGE; Well, I believe that the productivity committee will start looking at this in January. So, you know, next month, 16/ 6 fj t-t 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 they're going to be contacting you to set this joint committee up. Now, I don't know if that's going to be the two of you working independently or you're going to meet together. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: CHIEF PAGE: But that's {Inaudible} , something, you know, you, as a group, might want to consider. So thatls going to be an additional meeting for you or do you want a subcommittee? MIKE MURPHY: Okay. Then I have a suggestion to the chair that we create a subcommittee from this group to meet with a subcommittee of the productivity committee, and then perhaps sit -- when is your budget, in March, April? When do you CHIEF PAGE: We'll have to start presenting it before that. MIKE MURPHY: Okay, So then let us say, because of the time limits, work towards that committee meeting and bringing back to a joint group, maybe at the end of February, is that timely enough for you? CHIEF PAGE: Oh, certainly, MIKE MURPHY: Okay. Then that 7 .;~ A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 would be my motion, that we create a subcommittee of this group, have a subommittee -- ask them to create a subcommittee, and then jointly meet sometime the end of February, the intent purpose of discussions of this report and the economic as well as any other issues that might come up. CHIEF PAGE, Okay, Just -- we just need to, whenever that subcommittee meets, we need to let Jennifer know, because we have to publicly notice it. MIKE MURPHY, Absolutely, CHIEF PAGE, Okay, JEFF ALLBRITTEN: We have a motion to create a subcommittee. (Inaudible) second, first of all, the motion, we can discuss. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Uh-huh, NANCY LASCHEID, No, I don't have a second, but I have a comment. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Okay, Let's first get a second to his motion. Anybody? CHIEF PAGE: Mr. Chair? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Uh-huh, UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, I don't believe that we need a motion and a second to form a subcommittee. We can do that at your will as Li! ',1'11"6 fJ , I 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 chairman of the council. JEFF ALLBRITTEN: You know, absolute power corrupts absolutely, Okay, I'm happy, but I want to be democratic about this. That's fine. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay, JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Okay, Question? Nancy. NANCY LASCHEID: Comment. My comment would be concern about how you're going to divide who's going to be on the subcommittee. JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Well, I'd look for volunteers, first of all. I think the folks who are the most knowledgeable in the area would be the most logical folks to serve on this, that can work directly with us and the other committee. NANCY LASCHEID: But there should be some diversity UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Uh-huh, JEFF PANOZZO: Oh, absolutely, NANCY LASCHEID: -- within the committee. JEFF ALLBRITTEN: I stand looking for volunteers at this moment. NANCY LASCEID: I volunteer, JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Nancy, 9 161 i>' it~'* ..,' ~ ',,-.# 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 10 MIKE MURPHY: I'll volunteer, JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Okay, We have three. How many more would like to serve on this? Does the committee feel comfortable with a committee -- a subcommittee as small as three? MIKE MURPHY: I would like a representative, an ad hoc representative from EMS, though, if you don't mind. CHIEF PAGE: I don't think we can do that. I mean, I -- we can serve as a liaison, but we can't be part of your subcommittee. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Inaudible) . VICTORIA DINARDO: I can volunteer, JEFF ALLBRITTEN: More volunteers, okay, UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Inaudible) , JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Okay, So we will have a subcommittee that (inaudible). NANCY LASCHEID: And how will we choreograph the scheduling of the subcommittee? Will that come through your office? CHIEF PAGE: Yeah, We'll do it for you. NANCY LASCHIED: Okay, Thank you, 1 6 f"q 5;; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 11 CHIEF PAGE: And we'll provide the meeting rooms or whatever you need. NANCY LASCHEID: Well, we can meet here, if thatrs conducive CHIEF PAGE: Sure. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Uh-huh, JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Okay, CHIEF PAGE: I just need Jennifer to attend so she can do the minutes and stuff , JEFF PANOZZO: In January or when are we targeting meeting? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It (inaudible) early, MIKE MURPHY: January and then work towards a goal, I would think, of a joint committee meeting as they did with the planning and the productivity committee for one session sometime at the end of February so that any impact or economic impact is going to be forwarded into as recommendations to the individuals who are going to prepare the budget and eventually Mr. Summers (phonetic) and everybody else. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay, JEFF ALLBRITTEN: Comfortable with l' t{ ~ i Y"" I '") 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 that? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Uh-huh. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Very good. Thank you, members, who volunteered for that. Moving forward. (Inaudible) discuss consultants. CHIEF PAGE, Yeah, I think that covers all I had, unless you had a specific question about it. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, No, I don't. Anybody else questions, or are we just going to save this for the subcommittee? Okay. New business, then. Medical protocols? CHIEF PAGE, Chief Murphy had asked that we bring in the medical director to discuss the medical protocol, and Dr. Tober is here today, so I'm going to turn it over to Bob. DR. TOBER, Thanks, Jeff. Good afternoon, everybody. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Good afternoon. DR. TOBER: lId like to go over some of the thoughts and evolutions that have occurred over the many years that I have been the medical director of EMS here in Collier County. As many of you, some of you may not know, 16/ A 6 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 lIve been here since 1978. We, at that time, had Cadillac ambulances running as fast as they could to get to a hospital staff by EMTs, and I think -- were you driving back then? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Probably. DR. TOBER: That was why the roads were so dangerous. And so from June to February 2nd of 179, we pulled together a -- an ALS system and launched six vehicles, you know, on February 2nd of 1979, and at that time, I trained 18 paramedics, men and women, two of whom were Jeff Page and Tom Maguire, still with us today. And over this now almost 30 years, we have evolved to 26 ALS units, the emergence of some ALS engine staff by both Collier County EMS and the fire department. And have, thanks be to God, been given multiple accolades for doing a spectacular job in saving people's lives in this county. Today, we have an organized patchwork quilt of police and fire agencies making up a BLS safety net of primary intervention and help along with some areas having the additional backup of ALS engines, although this is inconsistent from one place to another. 16/ p? " tfr= ~V 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 14 Right now, Immokalee, Corkscrew, Golden Gate and Ochopee still only respond on a BLS level. Additionally East Naples Fire, while considered an ALS department, is not covering its entire district, as far as I understand, with ALS service yet. Over the years, lIve experienced, and like I say, I have been listening to a lot of people for a long time here, an increased effort on the part of the fire departments to play an increasingly major role in the delivery of pre-hospital medical care. The motives for such efforts are varied from firefighter to firefighter and fire chief to fire chief, but there is little question that over 80 percent of fire response today is to medical calls. That response may involve the very, very important role of fire suppression, extrication, rescue, water, whatever. So I don1t belittle that. The bottom line is that 80 percent of their response in our county is medical in nature. I have also increasingly heard the statement that a paramedic is a paramedic is a paramedic. That is, all such paramedics, from both the fire departments and EMS are state certified and -----.~"-" "1'J t... ! A 1 'fJ I' .. '\...: ~ 1 licensed. So why is there any difference in their 2 protocols or clinical liberties? Why are they 3 medically credentialed at different levels within 4 our one protocol, and why do the fire departments 5 continue to hire and develop additional paramedics 6 in their own systems? 7 Collier County has but one single medical 8 protocol. EMTs are able to work within the BLS 9 system. ALS engine medics work up to the level of 10 the ALS engine system. And rescue paramedics 11 working for Collier County EMS work the entire 12 protocol. 13 I reiterate, however, that there is only one 14 protocol. People working the streets, inclusive 15 of even the police, in cardiac arrest situations, 16 carry the protocol to whatever level they are 17 competent and practiced to deliver. 18 The rationale and answers to the above 19 questions are specific and with considerable 20 precedent. First and foremost is that a kitchen 21 can only handle so many chefs before each and 22 every chef no longer gets enough hands-on 23 experience to maintain their skills. 24 Hospitals have, for many, many years, 25 attempted to limit the number of critical 16/ (I' f~, ~.) 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 subspecialists, such as surgeons, so that each and every surgeon remains competent in their own skills. Medical credentialing still watches over the frequency of procedures and skills so that physicians remain competent and practiced to do these skills. In the last quarter, and I'm going to put on a few overheads here for you. I may have to turn down some of the lights. Just keep moving everything until it -- is that reasonably visible to you? In the last quarter, Collier County EMS wrote 7,484 tickets and did 41,456 procedures ranging from applying oxygen to complex medication administration. In comparison, East Naples, which is up there, did 608 procedures, of which only six ALS procedures were done prior to EMS arrival, and 484 procedures were done in the presence of the lead paramedic decision maker from Collier County EMS. I'll be happy to put these back up again, but I just want to give you some idea of what this looks like. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, (Inaudible) the 16 16 , j 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 focus, Doctor, if you could, please. DR. TOBER, Is that better? I can get both ways here to see UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, That's better. DR. TOBER, All right. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Thank you. DR. TOBER: Marco Island Fire Department, during the last quarter, wrote zero tickets and did 197 procedures in the presence of the lead paramedic decision maker from Collier County EMS. Naples Fire Department wrote zero tickets and did 102 procedures in the presence of the lead paramedic decision maker from Collier County EMS. I've got to keep walking back and forth here just to give you an idea of what is here. How is that focused? All right? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Uh-huh. DR. TOBER: North Naples Fire wrote 286 tickets. They did 517 procedures, of which 13 ALS procedures were done prior to EMS arrival and 504 were done in the presence of the lead paramedic decision maker from Collier County EMS. The medical literature is full of accounts of virtually a one-to-one correlation between the number of patient/paramedic encounters and that 16/ 17 A ; ~ l,J 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 18 paramedic1s respective abilities in terms of decision making, IV and airway proficiency. Great paramedics in our own system, like Jeff Page, who, at one time, was a very skilled clinical supervisor, with years of experience, would admit to you today that he is a dangerous paramedic because he is not actively engaged in the type of patient care and complex decision making that makes up paramedic medicine. Jeff Panozzo (phonetic), who is one of the members here, I probably have more than twice, or three times the years of experience in emergency department that Jeff has, but I would not go on duty at Physicians Regional, Collier -- Pine Ridge, without spending one or two months with Jeff to make sure that my current level of experience was high enough and current enough that I felt competent to staff the emergency department by myself, which I did for almost 30 years here in Naples. Recently, I spoke to an outstanding paramedic training at Collier County EMS, and now working for East Naples Fire, and that paramedic admitted to me that their clinical exposure at East Naples Fire is trivial in nature and insufficient to # , A ~" ;;, (~\ E 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 maintain their skills necessary to provide lead paramedic decision making. Why would I, at the insistence of my own paramedics that we loan to the ALS engine program, go to the trouble of rotating these same highly trained medics back to ambulance service every other month if paramedicine were not a technical and intellectual skill that requires constant practice to perfect and maintain? In Collier County, we have about 36,000 calls per year, of which about 7,000 of them are challenging and serious emergencies. Divide that number of 7,000 by approximately 128 Collier County EMS paramedics, of which only 115 are certified to the rescue level, and you have about 54 calls per year per paramedic, or four to five calls per month that are challenging, and ask that paramedic to reach deeply into their archives of skills, training and judgment. I am not the first medical director who has figured out that less is more when it comes to the number of critical paramedic decision makers in a system. If I diluted this system another 80 to 100 paramedics, I would face serious skills and decision making degradation. 16/ 19 fJ. . , 6 "If .1 20 1 Additionally, a Collier County EMS paramedic 2 not only arrive at our system with a license and 3 state certification, they go through a five-week 4 paramedic academy, followed by an internship with 5 a field training officer that can range from two 6 months to as long as a year if that field training 7 officer thinks that it is needed. 8 And depending upon the level of skill and 9 experience that that medic arrives, at some point 10 in time, he's either ready to sit in front of me 11 for a final look-see or we either keep him back in 12 training or put him back as an EMT because he 13 canlt qualify at a higher level. 14 Nationwide, there are many fire departments 15 whose stated goal is to have all of their 16 personnel certified as paramedics. This can and 17 does lead to an overkill situation at some times 18 with multiple engines, apparatus and manpower 19 arriving on the scene of an emergency that might 20 only require a few medics and one of them better 21 be sharp and skilled enough to make the right 22 decisions and provide the right care. 23 I do not know the extent to which organized 24 labor pushes for higher skill~based pay for their 25 members, nor the push to demonstrate equivalency A 6 1 of care with the local ambulance service, i.e., 2 Collier County EMS, to justify the very existence 3 of multiple tiers of paramedics within a system of 4 emergency response or the eventual plan to take 5 over transport of patients in their own district 6 and fracture the uniform system that we have 7 today. 8 I do know that there is a critical dilution 9 factor reference patient/paramedic experience and 10 our own study of the numbers demonstrates a vast 11 difference, an absolutely vast difference in the 12 patient/paramedic experience between a fire agency 13 and an ambulance-based paramedic. 14 Having the number of medics that we have in 15 the fire department is not all bad. They do, on 16 occasion, fill voids in our system in response to 17 a 911 call, especially if the call gets 18 misdirected or an inordinate number of calls come 19 out at the same moment. 20 I have given the fire departments enough fire 21 power, excuse the pun, to help stabilize a patient 22 prior to the arrival of Collier County EMS, but as 23 you can see from the following numbers, the fire 24 departments never approach the outside boundaries 25 of their clinical liberties with a patient, and in 7 t,. .'" ~ 'l..' 21 A l () ...'~. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 general, infrequently provide anything beyond oxygen and cardiac monitors on an ALS system basis. Enclosed are detailed sheets from the last quarter as well. 11m hitting you with a lot so you understand how and why we are doing what werre doing. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Put it down so that DR. TOBER, It's hard to get it allan here, but I will -- I want to get -- that's better all the way. There, if you can see from top to bottom. The upper portion of that chart is the medicine that is carried by both ALS engines and paramedics in the Collier County EMS. The lower portion is the additional 11 medicines carried by Collier County EMS. And as you can see here, these 11 medicines, which is what some of the fire departments are screaming that I give them, this is the administration time by a paramedic and EMS and how deep into a call those administrations occurred prior to the rescue paramedic actually administering that medicine. Again, nowhere near reaching the outside 161 22 A 6 1 limits of the protocols that are involved in this 2 list of medicines, which, in and of itself, is 3 extraordinarily liberal and probably more liberal 4 than most ALS/EMS systems in the United States. 5 So I wanted to make sure everybody 6 understood, on EMSAC, what this was about. 7 Collier County EMS and Bob Tober is unaware 8 of one single circumstance where the fire 9 departments, with far less experience using these 10 drugs, would ever have the opportunity to go that 11 deep into a protocol and reach into that basket of 12 11 additional drugs. 13 In the Emergency Medical Services master 14 plan, I quote the following, page 30. This 15 fragmentation of the certification licensure 16 system has created tension among the various 17 agencies and serves little purpose in the overall 18 medical direction of the system. With a more 19 consistent training and orientation program of all 20 ALS personnel, regardless of agency, the system 21 can begin to function more uniformly in regards to 22 pre-hospital medical care for the citizens of 23 Collier County. 24 Recommendation. Increase training, education 25 and practice consistency among all ALS providers, /" ~j'i A 6 t 1"'-.,'-' , ,. ~ , 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 and ensure that all providers are able to perform equal skills and procedures prior to certifying them to function within the system, end of quote. The authors of this master plan spent five minutes with me on the phone and many afternoons with respect to fire departments. Not only does Collier County EMS have nowhere near the resources to provide field training internships for another 80 to 100 medics, why would we bless the expenditure of these resources to highly train a group of people that could never maintain their skills? I reiterate to you that our own highly trained and experienced paramedics already loaned to the ALS engine service, with possession of these skills, are mandated to rotate every other month full time back to a transport ambulance on a rescue unit. Moreover, the figures enclosed do not lie. They clearly show what I have always maintained. The fire departments primarily provide a critical lifesaving BLS safety net to our citizens with occasional initiation of some ALS procedures. I have given them more liberties than most emergency medical systems possess. I would 16/A 6 24 25 1 consider any further advance of their protocol an 2 act of reckless disregard for patient safety, 3 given the absolute correlation of 4 patient/paramedic contact ratios and the outcomes 5 of those procedures and decision making from such 6 contacts. 7 Should the multiple fire agencies and EMS 8 consolidate someday within Collier County, I would 9 envision the following. Redistribution of 10 manpower to create a more homogenous presence of 11 firefighters and first response apparatus 12 throughout the entire county, continue to add ALS 13 transport units as growth demanded, but instead of 14 going outside to find paramedics, recruit the best 15 fire medics interested in patient care within the 16 agency, provide them field internships for however 17 long it took to bring them up to speed and then 18 emerse them in patient contacts the way rescue 19 medics are now emersed. 20 Continue to refine and maintain a system of 21 first ALS engine and BLS response so that any of 22 us in any corner of this county will receive 23 prompt and competent care. 24 Finally, I have asked Greg Pacter (phonetic) 25 to address all of you for a brief moment. Greg ---... 1 L r. ,-,0 i .4i'6 1 worked for some years as a paramedic with Marco 2 Island Fire Department. He was an enthusiastic 3 paramedic. He studied hard and was very anxious 4 to provide any and all care that he could either 5 before EMS arrived or concurrent with the presence 6 of EMS. 7 As a matter of fact, he often approached me 8 and asked me for more equipment and the liberty to 9 do more before EMS arrival. To an extent, he was 10 a thorn in my side, always nudging the system to 11 give him more and more clinical liberties. 12 Greg moved on to another job outside of Marco 13 Island Fire Department in Naples, and then 14 returned back to Naples and applied for a job as a 15 paramedic working for Collier County EMS. He 16 recently completed his training, as a matter of 17 fact, certified as a rescue medic with me two days 18 ago. And I wanted to invite you up for a moment, 19 Greg, uncoerced by me and unsolicited by me, to 20 give you his take on both sides of the fence. 21 MR. PACTOR: Thank you, committee, for 22 allowing me to speak to you for a minute. 23 Just a little background of myself. I've 24 been an EMT since 1987. In '89, I went to 25 paramedic school. I worked for Chief Murphy for a 16/ 26 .. I~ , f.,. U 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 number of years. I worked for Marco for 14 years, and five years I was a captain on B shift. I have an interesting perspective on this, working both sides of the fence. Just to understand the firefighter with the fire department, as also a paramedic, and then a paramedic who works for the county, also, some are firefighters, when you have a firefighter, you come out of the academy a green stick firefighter. They get into a fire department. They go through training, a lot of training. They learn tactics and protocols and skills. And they move up. And they advance through a chain and through a ladder. We want them to do that. We want them to learn more about the fire department and its operation so they can be a great firefighter, so they can go in and do the job working in a team, working with the engineers and working with their officers to save lives and fight fires and do the job there. AS they progress in their career, they become engineers. They learn pump operations. They learn hydraulics, intricate operations of expensive and complicated equipment that we use to 'f' .1' f.l!, -A.. '~... ' 27 ,...., .~ ~ 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 save lives in fires and rescue procedures. And then they move up to become officers. They1re learning tactics and protocols and skills. And we want them to do this. We want these firefighters to dedicate themselves and train themselves to be the best firefighters that they can be, that the best firefighters are out there. And I've had the fortunate opportunity, with many of the people in this room, to work alongside them. There are exceptional firefighters. There are great firefighters in this county that are, also some of them are paramedics. And they do a great job. Just as in this county, there are the paramedics with Collier County. They start as EMTs. They learn the EMT skills and they study the protocols and the tactics. And then they go to paramedic school and they become paramedics. And they dedicate themselves to becoming the best paramedics possible, by the dedication of learning these skills, learning the additional procedures to become these rescue paramedics. They have this continuous learning and education to keep high in their skills, so when it comes times to save lives, when it comes time for 161 A 6 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 29 those special medications and procedures, they're ready to do that. We need dedicated firefighters. We need dedicated fire officers that are trained in their skills and keep up on the skills and tactics that can also function as paramedics to a level. They don't have to go through the same level of training. They don't have to have the constant, continuous training to be up to the rescue paramedic level. They can have the engine medic level, and I worked at that level for many years. We had some drugs. We had enough that in the first ten minutes or so, or 15 minutes on scene, we can stabilize the patient. We can maintain that patient and keep them alive until the transport capabilities get there to take the care to the next level, to get them to the hospital. And with that dedication on both sides, with those paramedics training and learning and keeping up on their protocols and their skills, they are the exceptional paramedics. They are highly trained paramedics who are there to save the lives. And they are two separate functions. We need 16JR 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 paramedics who are at that level, who can keep up on the drugs and the protocols and the skills and they can keep -- to take the patient to the hospital, to maintain and save lives, as we need firefighters that are at that high level, that can take a group of men and women into a fire and put out the fire and save lives and do the rescue operations. So there is two separate specialities, and we need to make sure we have people training constantly to maintain that level. That1s my perspective on the operation. think -- DR. TOBER, Thanks. MR. PACTOR, Are there any questions that I I can answer? JIM MCEVOY, Are you saying that you donrt see a benefit to a firefighter/paramedic riding on ALS engines, having those skills, knowing those skills, and being able to practice those skills? MR. PRACTOR, Actually, it's quite the contrary. I really do believe that having additional paramedics there is very important. There are times that the engine gets on scene 161A 'a 11 6 I t\ ., ~ ~ Ii "",,,, 31 1 first and those paramedics, just as I was a medic 2 on an engine for many years, initiated care, 3 starting the care. But the long-term care isn't 4 there. 5 Very rarely would we ever be on scene 6 anything more than five minutes before an 7 ambulance was on scene with additional paramedics 8 with all the additional equipment. 9 So if we have the drugs that we can maintain 10 a life or save a life within the first ten minutes 11 of that critical care, which we do now, any ALS 12 engine 10 the county that's trained to that ALS 13 engine medic level has those drugs, has those 14 protocols, has those skills that they can do the 15 initial advanced life support care, maintaining 16 the life, saving life, whatever needs to be done 17 in the first, 10, 15 minutes, because we have the 18 protocols that we march on down. 19 We start with the BLS, the basic life 20 support. And then if the patient requires it, we 21 get into the ALS. And there's steps that we go 22 along the way. To get through all those 23 procedures and get through all those protocol 24 steps, it takes quite a bit of time. And that 25 whole time, the ambulance is responding there. 32 1 If the ambulance is in your district when 2 that call drops, they1re there right at the same 3 time as the engine. So very rarely do we start 4 the care as an engine medic and waiting and 5 waiting for an ambulance. They1re right there 6 together. 7 There are times, because of multiple calls, 8 that an engine may be there first. But there are 9 so many ambulances, there's what, 26 ambulances 10 scattered throughout the county, within five, ten 11 minutes, you'll have an ambulance on scene. 12 So to sit there and take your firefighter, 13 who is dedicated and training and constantly 14 educating themselves in the tactics and strategy 15 protocols and everything else with the fire 16 department, and ask them also to take on the 17 constant learning to keep themselves educated on 18 all the additional drugs and all the additional 19 procedures, we have that. 20 We want that firefighter to be the best 21 firefighter they can be, just as we want that 22 paramedic to be the best paramedic they can be. 23 JIM MCEVOY, Why wouldn't you 24 want that firefighter to be the best paramedic 25 that they can be? 161 '" pi,.,.. r~~ ' C"I 33 1 MR. PACTOR: There are some. There are 2 paramedics absolutely out there that can be 3 excellent, exceptional in both. That's not 4 everybody. But it is two separate jobs. 5 And when we sit there and we write protocols, 6 we write procedures, we don't write just for those 7 exceptional few. And 11m not going to say that 8 they are substandard -- there are paramedics out 9 there that meet the standard. 10 So to sit there and say to that paramedic, 11 not only do you have to be the best firefighter 12 that there is, but you also have to be the best 13 paramedic, it's taking two separate jobs and now 14 trying to educate them in that. 15 I think you JIM MCEVOY, 16 underestimate firefighters. 17 MR. PACTOR, Not at all, sir. I've worked 18 alongside many firefighters over the years, and 19 there are some great firefighter paramedics out 20 there, and there are some that meet the standard. 21 DR. TOBER, Greg, thanks. 22 Jim, let me just make one comment, again, 23 because it goes back to the same thing. 24 I've got -- there's two doctors that sit on 25 EMSAC, okay, Dr. Lee and Dr. Panozzo. lIve got ,....,.. 16 A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 34 twice the experience of both of them sum, okay? Twice the experience, all right? It doesn't make me better or worse. It's just a matter of fact. I'm much older and I have twice the experience, okay? I would not go on duty in either one of their emergency departments without emersing myself back for a few months in full-time care before I did it. What lIve put up on the board is an illustration that, for the most part, even the best paramedic/firefighters are only on scene a few minutes before Collier County EMS gets there, and then they fall back to a helper situation. It's not better or worse. It's what each person does in the system for a full-time living. That' 5 what it is. You can only -- you can only support so many paramedics with so many patient encounters in a system that has 36,000 calls a year. Let me close with the following. This county needs fire suppression, it needs rescue and extrication services and it needs the carefully stitched safety net of BLS/ALS fall-back that we currently have when EMS is delayed by more than a 16 I A6 1 1.';- / b , :l"'~~ 35 , '"..~J 1 few minutes. 2 This system already exists and functions at 3 an extraordinarily high and efficient level, as 4 evidenced by our survival statistics and literally 5 our world acclaim as one of the best places on 6 earth to have cardiac arrest. And that's because 7 of that carefully stitched BLS/ALS system that we 8 have. 9 Medical necessity, patient safety and 10 clinical credentialing have been at the heart and 11 soul of what I have done. Politics have never 12 played a role in my past decision making, and I 13 will not allow them to play a role in my future 14 decision making. 15 I am providing you with a detailed series of 16 articles, the first written by Matt Zabatski 17 (phonetic), a frequent national speaker and writer 18 about EMS systems, that underscores my points and 19 my insistence on limiting the dilution factor in 20 our emergency medical system. 21 The points of these articles substantiate the 22 following. There is such a thing as too many 23 paramedics and a serious downside to skilled 24 deterioration and a rusting of clinical decision 25 making in such systems. ._------"~. .'------ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 lIve gone through the same thing in the emergency department. I'd need to be spruced up by Jeff before I'd go back on duty full time by myself. Mannequins are a far cry from real patient encounters in terms of keeping paramedics fit and competent as primary decision makers. Degradation of abilities has been demonstrated repeatedly in many other systems when clinical encounters are diluted. An article from USA Today, which 11m giving you, indicates that the fewer the number of paramedics, the better the outcomes in complex systems such as ours. The third article I am handing you questions whether or not every engine even needs a paramedic, much less a paramedic that rarely delivers any substantive care past life saving, basic life support. Article four talks about survival and how such survival depends heavily upon how you deploy your police, fire and EMS resources. Infighting and turf wars are very dangerous to the publicrs health. Moreover, not all firefighters even want 25 to provide medical care. 16/ 36 A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 37 Lastly, fire chiefs can end up having more to say about medical care than a system's medical director. Article five, which is a joint position paper regarding the future of paramedic staffing in the State of Florida, endorsed by a host of organizations including the Florida Ambulance Association, the Florida Professional Firefighters, EMS providers, EMS Florida Medical Directors, the list goes on. There are nine agencies. On page four of this article which 11m giving you, the subject of doing more with more versus doing more with less is addressed. It calls into question the dilution of paramedics distributed over relatively low call volume, which is evidenced in the fire department statistics I have presented you today. This calls into question the advantage of having more less experienced medics versus a smaller pool of highly qualified providers like Collier County EMS utilizes. On page five, it goes on to say that this theory is thought-provoking, but not yet tested. I totally disagree. Collier County EMS has ...~ 6~"1 A""16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 been testing this very theory now for many, many years. I do not believe it is an accident nor a quirk of numbers that we continue to have one of the most cutting edge and highest survival emergency medical systems on earth. And that is due to a very thoughtful and carefully weaved net of BLS, limited ALS and full ALS that we practice in the county. The last article, six, has three major and important issues. BLS still trumps ALS in many circumstances involving life and death, as discovered by Ontario and the Ontario emergency medical system. There should be more BLSjAED equipped vehicles, and a small number of paramedic units result in more frequent practice of ALS skills and better outcomes. I brought to you this compelling, dragged out and lengthy, well-documented and substantiated set of data on paramedic practice in Collier County because I want you to have a better grasp of what I have -- why I have not authorized the wholesale credentialing of a wide range of paramedics in our system. Since I am authorized by the county to establish the protocol at levels for paramedic 16/ 38 .A 6 ..., ., .", ~'0 .'..'if 39 1 practice and ultimately to safeguard the public 2 safety in terms of pre-hospital medical practice, 3 I ask that EMSAC stand with me in supporting the 4 standards of excellence that we have achieved and 5 the structure of our deployment of BLS and ALS 6 resources, and the credentialing processes that we 7 have had and used successfully in this county for 8 many, many years. 9 Thanks for your time. 10 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Yes, sir. 11 MIKE MURPHY, Since I brought it 12 up, I might as well start. 13 First of all, I didn't bring this up as an us 14 against them issue. I brought this up because, 15 number one, is if you read this report, and you 16 can read whatever you wish to in this report, and 17 I have a lot of admiration for Dr. Tober and the 18 system that's here. 19 But I do believe that we have an opportunity 20 and should seize opportunities to improve the 21 system as we develop these systems and as the 22 economics of this county dictate that we are a 23 service provider, and we need to coordinate this 24 system so that the growth of the system obviously 25 reflects what is necessary. 40 1 We have rural areas in this county. We have 2 other areas in this county. And we need to work 3 together in reference to providing the best system 4 we can provide. 5 You can look at statistics and I can go to 6 page 29 on this report, and it says additional ALS 7 engine personnel are not allowed to carry the same 8 medications and equipment as does Collier County 9 EMS, creating a fragmentation of patient care. 10 To further confuse this issue, many of the 11 personnel currently functioning in the ALS engine program are current and/or former {inaudible} 12 13 county personnel with equal or greater training, 14 education, experience, as those operating on 15 county transport units. This inconsistency in 16 patient care also limits other personnel in 17 participating in the paramedic SWAP program from 18 performing certain skills and administering 19 certain medications simply due to the vehicle on 20 which they are deployed. 21 And yes, I go -- and you can go back on and 22 say that as you come up to the standards of 23 Collier County training, which I thought was the 24 issue, of what do we do to have to get there, how 25 can we improve this system in order that these "if L .1 Jl.Oi "', . If 41 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 individuals -- and we do have a lot of people. I would hesitate to say if you were to go through the data and look at all the personnel and the experience levels of the personnel, you know, it becomes questionable. Why move somebody from one agency to another agency and simply because they change their patch, they suddenly can't do what they could do before, yet, they have been trained. So how do we improve the training component of DR. TOBER: Mike, you're missing the point. It's not training. It1s ongoing experience. MIKE MURPHY, Dr. Tober, please let me finish. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, He didn't interrupt you. It's the same nonsense DR. TOBER, (inaudible) . MIKE MURPHY, It's not the same nonsense, Doctor. DR. TOBER, It is the same nonsense, Mike. 1'm sorry. MIKE MURPHY: There are (inaudible) . DR. TOBER, It's the same exact nonsense that 16 I A ., 42 161 I / ...~ 1 you1ve said about improving training. 2 MIKE MURPHY, There are 316 ALS 3 (inaudible) . 4 DR. TOBER: I have just spent a half a hour 5 showing everybody in this room -- 6 MIKE MURPHY, (Inaudible) . 7 DR. TOBER, the reason why we have a cadre 8 of highly practiced paramedics that make the 9 decision making and a group of paramedics that 10 help them. 11 How much plainer do I have to be about this? 12 MIKE MURPHY, You are plain. And 13 I have the right and the ability to question. 14 DR. TOBER, All right. I don't have to 15 listen to it. 16 MIKE MURPHY, You don't. 17 MIKE MURPHY: Let me finish, 18 please. 19 NANCY LASCHEID, Mr. Chairman 20 MIKE MURPHY, I just want to 21 bring up another point. 22 We're talking about, in Marco Island, 197 23 calls. First of all, let's give credit where 24 credit is due. The crews that go out there every 25 day do their job. They are a crew. They're a .--,.-..-------.-. 1 team. They're individuals. There are three 2 paramedics show up on a scene, two paramedics show 3 up on a scene, they work as a crew. 4 This lead paramedic issue is correct. The 5 first paramedic on the scene in most agencies is 6 the lead paramedic who makes the decisions for the 7 process that takes place in reference to that 8 patient care, whether they're there four minutes, 9 five minutes, and they work as a team to get the 10 job done. 11 The data and the statistics obviously show 12 that if 197 times procedures were done on Marco 13 Island, what's the ratio? We keep referring to 14 these people that rarely deliver substantive care, 15 yet they're on the scene -- 80 percent of the time 16 in this county, they're on a scene. So why don't 17 we train those people to the levels of their 18 capabilities. 19 DR. TOBER: They are trained to those levels. 20 NANCY LASCHEID, Mr. Chairman. 21 I'm going to MIKE MURPHY, 22 recognize (inaudible) 23 I'm not hearing NANCY LASCHEID, 24 training as much as I'm hearing practice of skill 25 with -- no, wait, excuse me. 43 161 ~I " t.1 l ~It~"~ S""" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 44 MIKE MURPHY, Absolutely. Okay. NANCY LASCHEID, Excuse me. MIKE MURPHY, debate that. NANCY LASCHEID, I r m prepared to Practice and skill. And I'm telling the truth, I sat through your presentation on October the 30th. I am highly questionable about the motivation as to why you want to change protocol with something that is so superb. I read this book, too, from front to back a couple of times. I find it to be negative and bias and it's all about statistics. It's not about the delivery of care to the level that we have enjoyed in Collier County. In addressing the issue of firefighters versus EMS, I understand your question. I think your question is a valid question. 11m hard pressed, as someone on this committee, to understand if my passion in life was to be a firefighter, which is admirable, why would I want to be taking care of sick people, too? It seems to me that the delivery of immediate care to sustain the patient, coming from an emergency background myself, makes sense. But 16 141'6 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 quite honestly, Mike, I'm really pushed for what your motivation is, because I'm not reading what you're reading. And when I MIKE MURPHY, Your-- NANCY LASCHEID: No, excuse me. I!m not finished. MIKE MURPHY, Okay. NANCY LASHEID, When I'm looking at those -- MIKE MURPHY, I wasnrt finished. NANCY LASCHEID, -~ statistics, I'm seeing something that says, man, how are you going to improve on something like this? I don't think anything you said the last meeting or this one holds any water. MIKE MURPHY, You're entitled to your opinion. NANCY LASCHEID, Correct. MIKE MURPHY, I think that, again, I do have -- it's amazing that a system, such as Broward County, with 338 ALS units on the road every single day, has training levels and expects their people and their competency levels to be the same throughout the county for delivery of care. Yet, we -- 16 J A 1 NANCY LASCHEID, And tell me about 2 your job over there. 3 MIKE MURPHY, What about my job? 4 NANCY LASCHEID, Yeah. Weren't 5 you in -- 6 MIKE MURPHY, I was a fire chief. 7 NANCY LASCHEID, Uh-huh. 8 MIKE MURPHY, And actually, I've 9 been certified as a paramedic in the State of 10 Florida since 1976. 11 NANCY LASCHEID, I'm proud of you. 12 But I still donlt think that we need to interrupt 13 what's going on in this community. And my concern 14 is the skill level 15 MIKE MURPHY, You keep saying 16 interrupt. It's -- I think 17 NANCY LASCHEID, I disagree. 18 MIKE MURPHY: The reason we're 19 here talk -- that's right. You're allowed to 20 disagree. And the issue that we're talking about 21 is there are many people moving around in jobs 22 throughout this county and they're moving from EMS 23 systems over into fire. They're moving from fire 24 to EMS, and they are moving around. 25 NANCY LASCHEID, I cannot, for one 46 161 n u 6 47 1 second, believe that the skill level is at the 2 acuity that it needs to be when you're moving 3 people 4 MIKE MURPHY, I think 5 (inaudible) . 6 NANCY LASCHEID, -- around -- 7 MIKE MURPHY, I think if you do 8 an analysis of the actual skill levels and the 9 number of procedures being done by each individual 10 in the field, which is data that isnrt there, no 11 matter what anybody says, it doesn't exist. There 12 is -- the data of the actual procedures being done 13 by medics in the field on a daily basis is not 14 captured across the board. 15 There are -- you go back to -- we keep 16 talking about the lead medic making the 17 determination. First of all, I personally am 18 insulted for all the medics in -- that work in the 19 field in Collier County when a comment is made is 20 that when the lead medic shows up, we continue and 21 they should fall back to a helper status. 22 They're not -- they are a team to begin with. 23 And that's insulting to those people out there 24 that are doing the job. 25 (Inaudible) don't (inaudible). DR. TOBER, .'it t i " ~ _l I., A "6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 " -y "i'I. ,\ '~ 48 MIKE MURPHY, They do their procedure, but we cannot -- we cannot even get -- the EMS cannot document every procedure that every one of their crews and all the crews that are being done out there. And I think we donlt give enough credit to those people that they are doing those procedures out there. NANCY LANSCHEID, It sure smacks of political innuendos, when, in fact, you have a proven track record in Collier County. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Recognize (inaudible) . JEFF PANOZZO, Thank you. r wanted to just make a comment about some of Dr. Tober's comments and just please let me speak. Doult interrupt. I have a pretty extensive EMS background. Certainly not like Dr. Toberrs, and I congratulate Dr. Tober for a remarkable career. You've done fantastic things. You are a mentor to me, and thatrs the only way I look at you. But I have to -- and the same to Jeff, obviously, a senior medic. And I think you guys are cutting yourself a little short by saying what you said about work. I'd have you work in our ED 16/ 49 1 anytime, and the same with Jeff. I'm sure could 2 get in an ambulance and do the same things, 3 lifesaving things at any point. 4 But I want to just, since you mentioned some 5 of my background, I want to just make sure it was 6 clear. I have 12 years of emergency medicine 7 practice, a four-year residency, and I also was 8 involved in emergency medical services as a 9 paramedic for about ten years. So add that up to 10 around 20 -- I think that's around 26 years, 11 right? 26 years? 12 I was thinking 35. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, 13 Itrs amazing. 14 JEFF PANOZZO, And unfortunately, 15 it shows my age and some of the gray hair. So I 16 have been in this area a long time, but I want to 17 tell you a unique story, Mr. Chairman. 18 I was working as a fireman during medical 19 school. And we had a fire in the middle of the 20 night. It was a private It was a big incident. 21 residence. There were people in the home, and 22 they were looking for these people and these 23 individuals in the home. 24 I happened to be involved on the hose line. 25 I was working as a fireman. I did have a star of l4 11 fl ,t,F"'1). .,.,' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 '-1 /'.' I.,. 50 life on the side of my helmet, which meant that I was a medic as well. And in my job, my job was to find fire and put the fire out. There were victims. There was another team that was looking for victims. There was an ambulance on the scene. I was not part of that ambulance, although I really wanted to be. They did find some victims and they removed those victims to a hospital. No more ambulances were on the scene. And they subsequently found a child, and I was the only medic left. I was working on the hose. I put the hose down and I went and I attended to the patient. I immediately began the resuscitation measures that were necessary. EMTs assisted me. We had another ambulance come in and off we went, okay? So the point of the matter is that medics can be firemen and firemen can be medics. This is werre talking about enhancement here. We're not talking about changing a level of care. All right. We're talking about enhancement of the service. In the service I came from, you were a true pit crew. It wasnrt a two-man crew that told other people you had to sit by. We were a true :<1'..11, " r A ,6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 51 pit crew. We could do activities of each individual up to our level of certification. I was a paramedic. I could do anything that any paramedic in an ambulance could do, and -- as I worked as a fireman. And our jobs frequently required it. And 1'm sure those instances happen here in Collier County probably almost weekly, at least, and maybe even daily. I just wanted to point that out. There's no personal bias. I have zero personal bias or interest other than 11m very interested in EMS, and I hope my career is long down here in Collier County, and I'm the director of the emergency department there, and that's where I will stay. My only interest is in -- I have a huge interest in this. It goes back to my father. My father was one of the first paramedics in Illinois, and I owe it to my dad to do it. I wanted to ask why, just a simple question, why don't we allow the merging of these teams to the full extent? Why not? What's -- what is what is wrong with it? You mentioned some things, Bob, but I do kind of wonder about the (inaudible), because 80 161~ ,6 "1 .;!"c_, 52 1 percent of the -- you mentioned 80 percent of the 2 calls are -- in fire service are EMS calls, and a 3 lot of those calls are attended by the fire 4 engines. 5 DR. TOBER, They start the call. 6 JEFF PANOZZO, Okay. They start 7 the call. It seems pretty obvious -- 8 DR. TOBER, They start -- they start the call 9 half the time. 10 But one of the problems is werve had nine 11 different separate entities here since I came 12 here. In '81, I tried to push forward a movement 13 to consolidate all systems, and no one wanted to 14 hear from me. 15 And to the extent that we do things today, 16 again, I reiterate that the protocols that the 17 paramedic/firefighters carry and the drug boxes 18 they carry are more extensive than most emergency 19 medical systems. 20 So I, by no means, am tying their hands. All 21 11m saying is that the reality of calls is that 26 22 ambulances are the primary emersion mechanism of 23 taking care of patients. Okay? I don't need 60 24 ambulances. I really need an expanded network of 25 BLS activity, which could go all the way to saving ;' A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 a child in a fire, would still be mostly BLS is what saves those people. In Ontario, most of the cardiac arrests are BLS saves. They1re not ALS saves. They're BLS saves. So it's not an issue of tying any patient of any paramedicls hands or saying that a paramedic is or is not better than another paramedic. It's where you live and what you do on a daily basis. I don't operate complex hydraulic pumps on fire engines. I don't have the first clue how to, nor is that what my interest is. There are paramedic firefighters who are first and foremost expert rescue, high angle, whatever their subspecialty may be in the fire service, and secondarily, they are paramedics doing a good job out there. But for the most part, in the network that we have built in this community for 30 years, they1re only on scene an average of two to five minutes, if they get there first, before another paramedic who is making complex decision making on an ongoing basis. And just to take one issue with one thing you .J~" 53 A 6 " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 said. I'm perfectly happy to help you in the emergency department. But before you lock me in that place all night, I'm spending two months with you, because I haven't done a lot of things in a long time. And thatls -- that doesnlt make you better than me, but your currency of experience is higher than mine. I've got paramedics sitting in this room whose clinical and decision-making experience continues to degrade because it's not what they do every day, okay? One of the best paramedics -- l've got two of the best paramedics live ever met in my life sitting in this room, but they're not making complex decision making every day. And if they came back to work for me, which l'd love, they'd first go back with a field training officer to get their feet wet again. JEFF PANOZZO, l'd just like to say that you have an open invitation to come and get those two months, then, because we could use some other people, and we would not stop you from that if you were interested. DR. TOBER: No, no, l'd stop me. I I d stop me. JEFF PANOZZO: We'd want you to be 54 161 A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 involved, absolutely. But that's the point. The point is it's a -- this is apolitical to me. This is patient oriented. And I just wanted to make sure that was clear. And I appreciate having the chance to talk to the committee about it. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Just, as (inaudible) chair privilege, I'll point out that probably of anyone on the EMSAC committee, I'm probably the most lay person in the room. While you're all doing -- working on hoses and people, l've been working on chemical stuff. But I think maybe that gives me a unique perspective, because I'm trying to see both sides of the issues here. I don't think there are sides. I think there's one big issue that has a lot of spheres of influence, and 1'm trying to make sure we just maintain a decorum in the room and figure out what we can do. Question for Chief Page. Action necessary, no action necessary? Simply discussion and move forward and staff reports? CHIEF PAGE, Well, I would like to make one comment on this. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Sure. 55 16/ 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CHIEF PAGE: Within the EMS department, I mean, I probably have 17 to 20 paramedics that are state certified that have worked in other agencies before, but because they havenrt gone through that training and with the field training officers, they're not able to practice on their own. Now, that's the standard that the medical director set for at least our department. Whereas, a paramedic firefighter, it's not the same. They don't have to -- they can operate independently in a much faster time, without riding on the ambulances at all. So Mike -- if you're going to say a paramedic firefighter from your department that hasn't ridden or gone through that training like ours have, and I think most of yours did, but -- MIKE MURPHY: That's correct. That is the point. CHIEF PAGE, But it's a little bit different. I mean, it's a little bit different, the amount of training you went through. You had so many PCRs to go through and things of that nature. But r'm just saying that it is not the same 56 16rf A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 training, and certainly, in your case, Jim, with your paramedic/firefighters, theyrve never even served with Dr. Tober. But yet they're able to practice, where my paramedics can't practice on their own. So there is a double standard here. And I just want to say, you know, werre going to continue, as an EMS agency, to follow the medical directorls, you know, standard, whatever that is. But it's not the same between the two agencies. And I donlt know how you ever get there. But one of the things that we did do -- because this isnrt new about the number of paramedics. I think, as you all know, we used to be almost completely double paramedic teams, and I only had two or three full-time EMTs at all. And over the years, through attrition, we now have about I think, 30 full-time EMT positions to lessen the number of paramedic to EMT ratios. That's the standard now. Now, I do have EMTs that go on to become paramedics, and they're in that system, but that's a good thing. I mean, it's probably a fifth of our service are EMTs. The rest are paramedics. But not all of them have been through that 57 161 /' .'1 .~ \,.c;/; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 58 training, but I!m just saying that is a difference, and that's really the only comment I have, okay, is the training standard. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, I'd like to (inaudible) . GAIL DOLAN, You go. JIM MCEVOY, I just wanted to break down the stereotype that firefighters are firefighters and paramedics are paramedics and firefighters don't want to do this paramedic stuff. The young men and women coming into the fire service today, for the last 15 or so years, understand that a vast majority of the calls that they're going to run are medical. That's why they gravitate to the medical training. That's why we have so many paramedics on our staff today, because that is what we do. We donlt simply put out fires and sit and wait for the (inaudible) to come off and see the smoke. We're emergency medical service responders, and as a priority, we1re emergency medical service responders. So don't think that firefighters don't want to learn and be the best paramedics 161 a 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 59 that they possibly can. Thatrs their goal. That's their focus. Thatts all I wanted to say about that. GAIL DOLAN, Well, perhaps we can help solve this problem. I've not been here for 30, but rIve been here for 20 years. I'm not a paramedic, I'm not a firefighter. I am a nurse, but God, you wouldn't want me to take care of you. I'm basically an administrator, but I have a lot of experience with getting people to work together to solve different issues. This argument has been going on since I have been here for 20 years. The paramedics want to do it one way, the firefighters want to do it another way. Who's going to do what first? Thatrs been going on forever. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Uh-huh. GAIL DOLAN, So my recommendation would be is that you do have some sort of a committee or work group, whatever you want to say, to fix this problem, because itrs not going to end. Bob Tober could go to Tahiti tomorrow and they would say, two days from that, Bob who. Then what? You know, you have to think about those ](. A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 60 things. Things change. The county grows. Economics are different. I mean, we could all go on and on. I don't think any of you would disagree with that. But I do think something has -- we do maybe have to not change the outcomes or the quality that we have because, in my mind, the patient is number one. And I don't think anybody disagrees with that here. But I do think we all -- a group of you do need to get together and talk about how we could, not necessarily change the system, but make the system so it's more of a team effort and not that the firefighter has to back away from the paramedic or whatever the scenario is, but somehow change the system on how we work together. Bob. DR. TOBER: Most rank and file paramedics on the street, whether they come from an engine company or EMS, work fine together as a team, but we have to have somebody who is the A, priority, establish leader. If and when there is conflict, somebody has to have the reins of the horse in their hands. We have not had one single episode where a ~ Ift'~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 fire or engine company has responded to a patient and been standing around with their hands in their pockets waiting for EMS to get there because they could not render care. It1s never happened. If it did happen, and as I told Mike Brown, show me where there are deficiencies or voids in our safety net, and I will fix them. He hasn't yet shown me any. And I don't know that any exist. So, we, number one, don't ever, ever have somebody standing around, waiting for an ambulance because they couldn't do care. r've entrusted a lot of trust and ability in the firefighter/paramedics. So don't confuse what I allow them to do with not respecting them. It's just the -- it1s just a question of what do they do full time and how far do they take it. You wouldn't take the least experienced firefighter you have and send them to take charge of a major building fire, and we don't do the same thing, okay? You've got fire specialists. We have medical specialists. You have BLS and ALS engine specialists. We have the final decision makers who transport these people to the hospital. 16/ 61 A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4t) a 62 There1s nothing wrong with this system. This system has still managed a survival, in cardiac arrest, of 37 percent, and with all due respect to Broward County, their -- I just gave them a lecture on cardiac arrest. They1re at 4 percent. So we are doing something right here, and I have no intention of diluting the patient/paramedic contact much further than I do. I mean, I need -- I need -- I need a lot of Indians to keep people alive, and I need less chiefs. But you can only have so many chiefs in a system. But when the Indians and the chiefs work together on a street level, theyrre all working fine (inaudible). That's not where I have the issues. I have the issues at this level. Not on not on the street. There are very, very few confrontations on the street. If there are, we have a training department that tries to settle it, and if there1s still an issue, I step in as the last court of decision. But for the most part, it works fine, smoothly, and they are teams. So don1t confuse respect with what you do day by day and how often you do it. And I don't A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 disrespect my own paramedics who I put on the ALS engines, who every other month I pull back to a transport unit and say you need to go and do this for a month so you don't lose any of those tough decision-making skills. It's just practice. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Before we have any more discussion with inside the committee itself, let me ask the chief, the expectations of least an advisory recommendation from this committee, in any direction, or are we simply just at debating a very difficult issue? I'm looking for the expectations while we still have a quorum. I doubt that we're going to see any sort of wisdom of Solomon then come out of out committee today. CHIEF PAGE, I'm just going to -- even if we put it to a vote, obviously, the medical director is the sole authority. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, We're just an advisory commission. CHIEF PAGE, Not even the board can tell you what he's going to do and grant. So -- but as a matter of interest, I would have an interest in how many, you know, where they feel, on which side or the other. But I'm 16 , A 6 63 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 certainly not going to ask the chair to poll the committee. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, The chair has no problem doing that. It1s just that I'm just wondering if that's something that would be of any value or necessity (inaudible). MIKE MURPHY, Since (inaudible) again, again, I don't expect a vote, and I don't expect somebody to try to tell Dr. Tober what to do. This is communications and discussion. This is an issue that is out there, and it is something that impacts the EMS community in the delivery of service. And that's what this board is here for. So our discussion on it is good. DR. TOBER, You're the chairman. 1111 give this to you. MIKE MURPHY, So bottom line, I don't -- there1s no vote going to be taken here to say Dr. Tober, you shall do this or not do that. And I would -- I respect him as the medical director. Again (inaudible). DR. TOBER, (Inaudible) I've got to go catch a plane and go to Tampa (inaudible). MIKE MURPHY: And I've got a meeting, too. 16 r APg 64 1 DR. TOBER: This is one protocol, okay? We 2 have a very, very integrated, highly effective 3 system now. I have still -~ I'm the medical 4 director here and I cannot tell you one medical 5 reason that I would give ALS engine paramedics any 6 more clinical liberties or any more training. 7 They don't get to do -- all these protocols, and 8 they take it to the green level on every one of 9 these pages, they don1t ever reach the bottom of 10 these green levels, okay? 11 If we had a if we had a difficulty or if 12 we had a void in the system, we would fix it 13 immediately. Everybody who knows me, and there 14 are lots of you in this room that have worked for 15 me for many years, when I know there's a problem, 16 it is fixed yesterday, okay? 17 The one thing I wasn1t gifted with was any 18 political nonsense. I call a spade a spade. 19 Okay? You give me a solid, intelligible and 20 substantive reason to go and bring a huge amount 21 of training to 80 to 100 additional men who won1t 22 ever touch those skills unless they come to work 23 for EMS, or we have some other reformulated, 24 consolidated system here and throw out every 25 single structure that we now have, and then ...... , 161 65 A 6 -~'-~"~--"'-~'''---,"'-'' -----~.._-_. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 rebuild the system again with a different number of transport ambulances, it1s just never going to happen. NANCY LASCHEID, Mr. Chairman, this is a lot of material. We have focused on an issue where there is a success rate within the community. There's enough material in here statistically as to the growth of Collier County that we have enough to work with. If, in fact, this issue, and as Gail said, this has been around, we've been here longer than Gail has, so this has been around for quite awhile. If this issue is to have resolution, itrs not going to be at this table with people who have different opinions. There's enough material in here for us to go forward and enjoy what is status quo in Dr. Tober's department. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Thank you. And I believe the fact that we1re going to have a subcommittee go look on the master plan. NANCY LASCHEID: Oh, won't we have fun? JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Along with that. So, therefore, I would like to bring this 16 66 l 1 l.,.. LJ ,u? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 discussion to a close and move on to the section of staff report, because I know Chief Murphy has to leave at 3:30. I will be losing a quorum. CHIEF PAGE: Okay. MIKE MURPHY, So in terms of (inaudible). Is there any action that needs to be taken (inaudible)? CHIEF PAGE, No. I mean, actually, it was your topic. I didn't want to steal it from you. That was MIKE MURPHY: No, that1s okay. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, (Inaudible) . MIKE MURPHY, I don't know if anybody in the audience wishes to speak on it. Probably not. CHIEF PAGE, We don't have any registered speakers, right? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, (Inaudible) . CHIEF PAGE, Okay. The only thing with staff and report is we're currently down ten positions full time. l've got how many part-time positions in? Five or six? JENNIFER FLORIN, Six. CHIEF PAGE: Six. So I'm probably -- I have the support of Mr. Summers of 67 161A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 68 actually going to the manager's office to see if we can pick up I've got one full-time employee that wants to go back to part-time. So maybe I can pull a part-timer up to his spot. So welre going to be looking to go to the manager for some support on that. But other than that, that's really all I have to report. So are there any questions? MIKE MURPHY, (Inaudible) action by this board in reference to support (inaudible)? Wouldn't it be good to carry a voice that this voice would be in favor of that? CHIEF PAGE, Well, I would like to get to at least my minimum manning. But the other side of that, Mike, is that it's a budget. I can -- when we were fully staffed at the beginning of this budget year, I had to lose like nine positions just to make my budget for the reductions they gave us. So I think I'm going to be able to do this on my own, but if I'm not, I'll certainly come back to you and let you know, so JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Very good. You say we have no registered speakers for public comment? This is the biggest audience live ever seen. 16 1 A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, No. I think Diane (inaudible) like to speak (inaudible). UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, I don't think we realized we needed to register. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, It's up to the chair. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Okay. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, I think there is one. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, The chair -- if the committee is (inaudible) some latitude, 1'm willing to entertain, for at least a (inaudible) time, some speakers, since there was such a large attendance. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Sure. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Come up. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, I'd like to thank everybody for coming. This is the (inaudible). I was in good company. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Yes, you were. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, (Inaudible) . MS. WATSON: Hi. My name is Lieutenant Diana Watson (phonetic). I work for East Naples Fire. r know everybody here. I worked for Collier County EMS for 11 years. And I just want -- I 16/ A 6 69 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 70 know this topic has been going on for a long time. Since I've been here, too. Very interesting going from the EMS side to the fire side, as I'm sure is for Greg going from the fire side to the EMS side, because itrs a completely different perspective. One of the things I want to say is, listening to Dr. Tober speak concerns me. I love Dr. Tober. He's my mentor as well. He brought me up. But one of the things that concerns me is werre so stuck on they1re only on scene by themselves for two to four minutes. Well, two to four minutes isn't the number we should be looking at. How long are we on scene total with that patient, you know, how long -- are we providing patient care as a team? And my feeling -- when I went to East Naples, you know, I left Collier County for a reason. I mean, East Naples was a better opportunity for me, and what I realized, after being there for a couple of months, was I was looking at it wrong. East Naples Fire Department paramedics and EMTs didn't have to do it on their own, that the team approach is what it1s all about, because that's better for the patient, and that's always been Dr. ,"".' 16 I A"~6 71 1 Tober1s mantra. 2 And it concerns me when we start trying to 3 pigeonhole people into one place based on they're 4 there two minutes ahead of time, because, in my 5 opinion, when somebody becomes a paramedic, they 6 become a nurse, they become a doctor, they become 7 an EMT. They have a responsibility to maintain 8 their level of certification and their knowledge 9 and their skills. That1s your responsibility when 10 you take that on. 11 So what I always encourage my guys at East 12 is, you know what, you may be only able to 13 function in the green of the protocol, but you 14 need to know the blue, which is rescue paramedic 15 protocol, because you know what, when you're on 16 scene and the patient is going down the drain, and 17 that paramedic is sitting there with five 18 different things he needs to do, if you're 19 standing there going, I don't know that part of 20 the protocol, sorry, I'm not required to know it 21 because I'm only an ALS engine level, who is that 22 fair to? 23 And by differentiating out who can only go to 24 what level, I think you separate the 25 paramedic/firefighters and make the -- it 1 f. ;OJ ;:~~ l. ,.I , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 belittles their capabilities and what they can do. And the fact is, is that if you go to any ER, every nurse doesn't have the same knowledge and capabilities. So you want them all to have knowledge and capabilities, but when you're in there working together, you know that there's always one person that's stronger in calculations than the other person. And I agree that there should be a lead medic. I don1t agree it always has to be the Collier County EMS medic, because the fact is there's been a high turnover. A lot of them are inexperienced. Your most experienced medic may not be from Collier County EMS. And you can say they're the lead medic, but that1s not how it falls out. Just like in an ER room, if you have someone that's brand new to your department, they may have more critical care capability than someone that's been there for 20 years. Inevitably, when the patient is going down the drain, that person will step in and start taking over just from the standpoint that everyone around knows they have those capabilities. So why pigeonhole somebody into a position where if I'm on scene and I see something with 72 161 A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 73 patient care that's being done incorrectly because now my certification is lower than it was when I worked with EMS, I can't function at that level anymore, why shouldn't I be able to say, hang on. You know what, I don't think you should do it that way, and because patient care is what it's all about. You have to have the ability to function at that level. And the other thing that always strikes me when dealing with EMS, just over the last year I've seen this, because when I was on the EMS side, it was like whatever you want to do, the fire departments do it. They're trying to take our jobs. So go for it. You know what? In a year, I've completely done an about face. They keep talking about how our skills are going down and theyrre, you know, getting degraded because we don't have patient contact and all those things I but at the same time, we're required, in order to have a ALS SWAP program, to have one of their paramedics on our ALS engine, but their firefighter paramedic is only there six months out of the year. He gets six months of trainingl when our guys get 12 months of training in firefighting. '13 1 ", '" 1"1 ;7 i;'~~-;\ :', .. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 So we1re forced into that to have the ALS engine agreement. How is that fair? We have someone on our unit thatts only there six months, half the time, to learn the same skills and have the same knowledge as our firefighters. So if you want parity and you want things to be fair, then be fair. If you don't want -- if you're going to say, on one hand, that the firefighter paramedics from the fire departments cantt keep up their skills because they don't ride a unit, then let1s be fair. Do the EMS paramedic/firefighters have the skill to ride a fire truck and respond to structure fires? I don! t know. And am I saying one is right, one is wrong? NO. I think both sides are equally capable, and I think that when we're in this position where we're talking about it, itts very easy to throw out numbers. You know, when I see that data on the screen, I'm very suspect, because I know for a fact we've only been putting in trip tickets for, I don't know, four or five months, and even now, our data is not completely accurate because our system hasn't been able to verify. .;0'1 d;~ A 6 iN ~... -!j'J "",) 74 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 So when I look at those numbers, 1'm suspect. And not that I wouldn't love for our guys to have put in that many tickets, but I just -- I don't know where those numbers are coming from. So when you're looking at this from a committee, I completely understand the worry about skills. But let me tell you, at least from East Naples, our paramedics get six hours of medical training a month. Our EMTs get three hours of medical training a month, plus all the calls and everything else they do. I would like to know, and I know EMS provides direct (inaudible) services every other month for their paramedics. So if werre going to talk about training and skills, I think the fire departments will step up and start doing things, you know, to make people feel more comfortable, but I think part of the problem is that there's no parity. It's expected for the fire departments to do what they're told to do, and yet, on the flip side of that, we have no recourse, because we want to provide ALS engines for our people, and Collier County holds the certificate of public necessity. So, you know, werre trying to get along to get along, but at the same time, don't cut down 16/ 75 .'; ?o ~.".1" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 76 what we are as paramedics. I will always consider myself a paramedic first. And, you know, the fact is, is that I would put myself up against any Collier County paramedic, except for Michelle Williamson and -- any day of the week. And I would take my medics from East Naples and put them up against Collier County EMS medics any day of the week. Sit them down. Do a board. We1re ready to go. And I think that North feels the same way, and you know, these other departments that are up and coming feel the same way, and I think that it's something, instead of looking at it as us versus them, letrs start looking at it as a whole, the whole patient outcome, because you know what, the cardiac arrest resuscitation rate means nothing if NCH doesn't get them out the door or Physicians doesn't get them out the door. That rate means absolutely nothing. So if you guys don't do your jobs, ours means absolutely nothing. We're a team. That's what needs to be focused on, always as a team, instead of as an us versus them. I don't care about the two minutes of BLS or ALS care that my guys provide. I want to know, 16/A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 77 were they able to do skills in the back and help that patient, you know, did they help the EMS medic or were they a hindrance? You know, that's what's important. That's all I have to say. GAIL DOLAN: So have we ever gotten the fire chiefs and the EMS chiefs together in a room? MIKE MURPHY, Yes. Actually, there is an EMS subcommittee that operates, which is designed to bring forward things, and one of their recommendations was one common protocol and elevate the training levels of the paramedics in the field for better basic care. GAIL DOLAN, And what happened to that? MIKE MURPHY, The medical director (inaudible). CHIEF PAGE: Don't make it so simple here. Now, listen, because now you're going to get me upset. But I want to make it clear, your guys have never agreed to do the same level of training, period. When a matrix was decided, you didn't even want to require them to have 72 hours in a year '7([ A'6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ride time. 50-- MIKE MURPHY, Absolutely. And again, I go back to the basic {inaudible} premise. If you were to analyze every paramedic's skill thatrs being done in the field by every individual, you will find that X percent only deliver babies, X percent only start IVs, X percent. There is no data that's there. How you maintain skill levels, because there aren't that many procedures done in the field anywhere -- how you maintain levels is through a phenomenal training program and skill evaluation program, and an excellent QA, QI system. There were 88 paramedics out of 122 employees on my system. I expected every single one of them to function to the highest level of capability. Were there individuals who could do cut-downs in the field, were there individuals who administered TPA and paralytics and all of those things? Yes, there were, but it wasn1t a blanket statement that says because you arrived on the fire truck, you weren1t capable of doing the job. And that's where I feel it1s an insult to these individuals out here. Let1s elevate the training level. This isn1t 161 78 .~ 6 79 1 political. This is a fact of, as years ago, I 2 came to this county, sat down with the county 3 administrator of this county and said, why aren1t 4 we maximizing the utilization of existing 5 personnel in the field to their greatest 6 capability to the advent of the citizens and the 7 service we deliver in this county. 8 And instead, this is us against them, and 9 it's not. What it needs to be is improvements to 10 the city. And that's my political speech. And I 11 do have to leave. 12 I apologize, but I do have a conference call 13 with my medical -- with my city manager in less 14 than 30 minutes. 15 JEFF ALLBRITTEN, The chair is going 16 to recognize another speaker. 17 MIKE MURPHY, Thanks. I'm sorry. 18 MR. WATSON: Well, I'm Eric Watson. Most of 19 you in the room know me, and those of you that 20 don't, I worked for EMS for 17 years, 17 plus 21 years, and I've had the opportunity and taken 22 advantage of, to teachJ at Edison, the paramedic 23 program. And I've probably trained, I don't know, 24 a good handful of the paramedics. I'd like to 25 think the better paramedics that work for Collier Ir-Cl j; Vi A 6 80 1 County EMS right now. 2 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, What school is 3 that? 4 MR. WATSON, Edison. 5 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Edison? 6 MR. WATSON: Yes. And you know, it!s a 7 unique perspective, because I did the opposite of 8 what Greg did earlier. I left EMS, went into the 9 private sector, something completely different, 10 and found myself coming back and had cross-trained 11 years ago, but originally was an EMT and paramedic 12 since 1984, and chose to go back into the fire 13 service side of things and look at it from that 14 perspective. 15 And you know, I would offer up that I agree 16 with some of the statistics that Dr. Tober says. 17 I mean, the fact of the matter is, Oxytocin, I 18 don't know how many people in here are medical or 19 not medical, but Oxytocin and your Dopamines and 20 your Captoprils, very, very rarely touch, but I 21 would offer up, in opposition to that, is there 22 nothing worse in the world, and I think we've all 23 been in that situation before, than needing a 24 phillips head screwdriver and all you1ve got is a 25 flat head, need a ten millimeter socket and all 16/ fr~. 1~ ~L, 81 1 you've got is a nine. It absolutely, positively 2 stinks. 3 And you know what the fact of the matter is, 4 the reality of it is? More often than not, 5 statistically, you're not going to touch those 6 meds in the first ten minutes. He's absolutely 7 right with that perspective. But from my 8 perspective, and I'm telling you, you know, Diana 9 said she wouldn1t lay her skills down in front of 10 Michelle Williamson, I'll lay them down to anybody 11 in the country, because I stay sharp, I teach, I 12 keep up on these things. 13 So, you know, from my perspective on the fire 14 side, and lId also like to think that the guys in 15 the department I'm with now does not participate 16 in the ALS engine program. It's Big Corkscrew 17 (inaudible) Fire Rescue, they do the BLS 18 perspective. 19 What I can tell you is we've got six 20 paramedics out there, and 11m going to playa 21 large role in their training, and trust me, 22 they're going to be sharp. I'd like to think that 23 I just graduated 21 of 22 from Edison that are 24 coming out, and I promise you, they're not 25 cookbook medics. They know their anatomy and -'l 'A i , . 6 ";. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 82 physiology. They understand alpha and beta receptors and how they work and how they interact with meds and all of those things. So it, really, a lot of it does come back to training. And the reality of it is, a lot of the skills that you're going to practice out there, mechanical skills, Dr. Tober might have fallen off the bike a few times, but within a couple months, herlI learn to ride a bike again, as he admitted himself. The reality of it is, a good paramedic and what makes them a good paramedic ultimately is assessment, you know, the ability to recognize a critical situation, and then intervene appropriately. And that's where the training makes a difference. I would offer up that one of the things, as an example, that's frustrated me in this new protocol roll-out that we just did was -- and I'll make two points in this. One, that these -- that ALS engine paramedics can't do 12 lead ECGs. 12 lead ECGs, they're not invasive. Itls not like 11m intubating somebody. It's not like 11m using a (inaudible). It's not like I'm doing external jugular or an internal or 161 ,'I H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 a femoral. And yet, I go back, I've been an ACLS instructor now 15, 16 years, and I go back to that chain of survival that the American Heart Association has been preaching for well over a decade, early access and early recognition. Well, I don't have a 12 lead ECG, and we look where we are in treating MIs, I can't recognize a myocardial infarction. And you know what, from a paramedic's perspective, a skilled paramedic, I'm not worried about the guy that's wringing wet and is hypotensive and short of breath and crushing chest pain, because Stevie Wonder can see he's having an MI. But if early recognition is really what it's about, then I need that 12 lead ECG. I would offer up, why did EMS purchase the audio course? Early recognition. They want to be able -- they -- somebody theorized out there that these S sounds and murmurs and everything else, that the heart physically makes sounds when it1s going through an infarction. And so early recognition and early access, being non-invasive, why don1t all paramedics in Collier County be held to the 12 lead ECG 83 161A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 84 standard? I can understand not giving them Dopamine, although I can tell you I can recognize somebody in cardiogenic shock like that. And you give me the team of two guys that I work with on a regular basis, I'll be on it. I'm telling you right now I'll drop a Dopamine drip in well under five minutes it will take me to assess, recognize, appropriately diagnose and then treat that patient. But that's me. And you know what? Statistically, we can go back and we can look and see what these paramedics are doing. I will tell you in 1987, when I came to work for Collier County EMS, Terri {inaudible} was my trainer. Man, oh, man. Tough little trainer. And she got on me, got in my face one day at the ER. You have got to know this stuff cold. Do you realize where you're going to be in three or four months? Youlre going to be sitting in front of Tober and you have to know this stuff cold and you've got to be sharp. And I said, you know what, Terri, I said, the fact of the matter is, 11m a one-year (inaudible) . I'm so afraid of missing something and zoning in, it1s not even funny. Now, you give me your seven years of experience, and 1'11 be 16/A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 85 just as sharp if not sharper than what you are. So somebody's ability to recognize and then appropriately treat a patient, I'll draw a strong correlation to overall experience, not just skill degradation, but overall experience. I mean, there's -- 1'm out there running calls. I'm on an engine. A lot of these people in this room aren't even out running front line calls. Like Dr. Tober said, just not out running calls. Danis not out running calls. Wayne's not out running calls. Greg is, but for the most part, if you're -- I'm out there running calls. 11m running calls with six month medics that went through that regimented training program, and I'm recognizing -- I've recognized stuff in a third of the time of what they're recognizing it for no other reason than my experience and nudging them, hey, it's this, it1s not that. You know, or just guide them down that track. of that situation. And I think the other frustrating thing was, So that1s the reality when this whole ALS engine argument carne about, what, I don't know, probably ten years ago, Dan? Something like that. Seven, eight years ago. In the fire service, in Collier County, there weren1t 16./ A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 86 a whole lot of paramedics. And what paramedics they had, had gone through the training program at Edison and graduated. So there wasn't a lot of actual street experience. Well, now, thatls changed as a result of some issues that EMS had with the commission or whatever, and a high turnover rate, George. Where is he? How many years of experience? JORGE AUGILLERA, 20 plus. MR. WATSON, 20 plus myself, now. Paramedic for 20 years now. Diane, how many, ten? Andrea, how many? You got 40 or 50 years of experience sitting in the room that were trainers. I've got an EFTO pin in my little box on my dresser at home from when I worked for EMS. CHIEF PAGE, Yeah, bring that back. MR. WATSON, And now Jeff wants it back. I was going to keep it and put it on my (inaudible) and hang it in a shadow box one day. But the fact of the matter is, yourre sitting on 40, 50 years of experience in training thatrs available to the fire service now. And trust me, these guys, we're training them. I hit my guys "" f ~ I '6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 87 161 A 6 hard, I'll tell you that. And so from that perspective, I just go back to that little thing. Nothing stinks worse than needing a phillips head screwdriver when all you have is a flat head. And some of the Collier County EMS paramedics are going to get parts of that protocol because of skills, because of experience and assessment abilities, and that will progress in time as they age and as they get to where I'm at. And trust me, I didn't have that confidence level when I was a one year medic that I have now, you know, that I had when I was a ten year medic. So I think it's frustrating. You know, an example is the 12 lead ECG. I don't argue the point with the Captoprils and the Dopamines and the stuff like that, because hers right. For the most part, you're not going to touch it in a lot of instances. But by the same token, I would. And there are medics out there that were trained that will touch it. The ones that aren't comfortable or don't recognize the situation won't do it. That's all. Thank you. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Thank you. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 88 GAIL DOLAN, This gentleman just confirms, and I don't know him from that screen up there, but he just confirms what I said. You're going to have to get together with the bosses and the chiefs and all these people with experience like that, and you're going to have to come up with some sort of resolution that makes everybody in agreement. Obviously, you're not in agreement here. I mean, you might have that committee, but -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, I think we're at impasse. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, (Inaudible) . UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, You can't -- can't the committee (inaudible). UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, (Inaudible) . UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, No, I don't. That hurts. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, He's your boss. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Oh. (Inaudible) . MR. WATSON: I mean, lIve been teaching there for years. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, (Inaudible) . JEFF PANOZZO, Jeff, I think he needs a raise. 1 !,~\ f\ 6 89 16 I A '6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Thanks a lot. JEFF PANOZZO, And can't the committee, can't we just draft a letter to -- is it the Collier -- GAIL DOLAN: Commissioners. JEFF PANOZZO, -- Board of Commissions? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Yes. JEFF PANOZZO, And ask them, plead with them to address this? I mean, I don't think we need a we don't need a -- I mean, something has to -- we have to come up with something today. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, I think we -- if I understand our role, and I (inaudible) the spectrum of influence that we might have. It's in trying to take a bunch of data and look at positions like this and make a recommendation through the appropriate agency to the Board on actions they might take. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Would it be appropriate for us to make a position on the fact that there is such a wide (inaudible). I'm sitting here learning a great deal today. I find myself, as, once again, on both sides of this issue. I mean, we could do that. I'm not sure 90 1 (inaudible) . 2 JEFF PANOZZO, We don't have 3 (inaudible) draft a letter of our intention. 4 Exactly what you said. I agree with you 5 totally 6 NANCY LASCHEID, If we agree. 7 JEFF PANOZZO VOICE, -- that -- 8 JEFF ALLBRITTEN, (Inaudible) sitting 9 on the -- 10 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, No. 11 JEFF ALLBRITTEN, My guess is, just 12 my guess is if we went to a vote, we'd be split 13 about four, four (inaudible). 14 JEFF PANOZZO, But do we want this 15 to continue for another 20 years? I don't think 16 so. 17 GAIL DOLAN, I don't think so. 18 NANCY LASCHEID: I don't think so, 19 but as I said, you know, therels a lot of material 20 in here unrelated to what we1re talking about, and 21 you're also forming a subcommittee who's going to 22 come back with some kind, hopefully, some kind of 23 outline that will then be discussed again. 24 It's not going to be resolved today. I mean, 25 it hasn't been resolved for years. And I would 161 }~ h ~" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 hope that at some point we can take the political innuendo, we can take the personal challenges out of it and we can go forward. I don1t think we need to do anything today. We've got a solvent system. It's just a matter of moving forward with the project. And as far as making that kind -- I understand where you're coming from because you want to bring closure to something and go forward, but I don't think we're there yet. So in respect to that, I would say, yes, that's something we could probably look at, but we're not there yet would be my recommendation. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, ( Inaudible) subcommittee (inaudible) framework where a discussion could roll (inaudible). Because obviously it's not going -- it1s not going to be pleasing. Whatever we did today, even if we had a quorum, I'm afraid would be JEFF PANOZZO, I'm not a real -- I don't like to meet, meet, and meet, especially now you1re listening to UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Really? JEFF PANOZZO: Well, you're hearing -- you're hearing some passionate pleas on 16 I A 6 91 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 all sides here. CHIEF PAGE: Jeff, excuse me, though, man. I mean, I could have brought in all my paramedics today, too, but that wasn't what we had planned to do. I mean, you're hearing from the fire side, yes, but I can tell you that my paramedics that have to go through the training that they're not required to do would be just as vocal as saying why don't why give them certification to perform when my own people canlt? I mean -- NANCY LASCHEID, My understanding of today -- JEFF PANOZZO, (Inaudible) the gentleman that spoke, that Bob invited up and spoke (inaudible) that spoke. NANCY LASCHEDI, My impression of what was to happen today was that Chief Murphy had had some very strong feelings at the meeting on the 30th and had shared those, and it was an opportunity of Dr. Tober to present some of the additional data. So as far as my perception of today's meeting was we were still gathering data. JEFF ALLBRITTEN: That's correct. C;i 'I Ii. A 6 92 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 93 NANCY LASCHEID, That was my understanding. Not that we were making resolution. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Right. I couldntt garner, by reading simply the minutes or reading any comments between members, exactly the level of the issue. NANCY LASCHEID, Oh, you weren't there at the last I thought (inaudible) UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, We had (inaudible) NANCY LASCHEID, Yeah, I'm sorry. JEFF ALLBRITTEN, (Inaudible) . So I'm getting quite an education today. I certainly wouldn't be in a position to render an opinion on my own just as one member of this committee. So I think you1re kind of -- Nancy is absolutely right. We are simply still in fact finding. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, (Inaudible) . GAIL DOLAN, So if you're at an impasse, as you say that you are, correct? You would say that you basically haven't solved the issue. CHIEF PAGE, Well, I don't think there's -- if they don't want to go through the same training, then how do we do it? I mean, "",. ","' ff ~ 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 either hers got to lessen the training that the EMS paramedics have to do in those tirnelines and them going from zone to zone each month. Our guys have got to have the same deal. And if it's, you know what, we're going to dummy it down to it's a couple of weeks training and nobody has to ride anymore, that's fine. I just want my same guys. GAIL DOLAN, Okay. But maybe therers a solution. For instance, rather than let's not focus on the training part, although that might very well be the issue. Letts -- how about we focus on patient outcomes? I mean, 1'm not saying that's the (inaudible) Letts focus on patient outcomes and see. So if you say to the firefighters, okay, you know, tell us whatever your training is. I mean, I have no idea. Neither do I have any idea about the paramedics. But maybe there1s some sort of correlation we can make between the two and say to the firefighters, okay, you do this, this and this, and EMS does this, this and this, but they're the same or whatever. And then you see, after two months or one month or six months, however you want to measure it, how do the patients fare. 161 94 '~! 6 , , 95 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NANCY LASCHEID, Outcome studies are always a measurement. That's GAIL DOLAN, Absolutely. NANCY LASCHEID, -- always the best thing to do. GAIL DOLAN, So if you do some evidence-based guidelines, just like we do for everything else, why donlt you do the exact same thing for that. And then this will definitely, will go away either way, because you're going to find out (inaudible). CHIEF PAGE: Not necessarily Gail, because Dr. Tober calls the shots, ultimately. (Inaudible) . UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, GAIL DOLAN, Okay. JIM MCEVOY: Six years ago, we didn1t have firefighters practicing as paramedics in the county at all, in no way, shape or form. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Uh-huh. JIM MCEVOY, Through much discussion and cooperation, we developed an ALS program, and they were even more strict or more restrictions put on the firefighters three years ago and four years ago than there are now. 16: A 6 ~ 96 1 It has evolved. As George will tell you, we 2 predicted it would. It would evolve, but we 3 needed to take the baby steps and get a true ALS 4 delivery system going throughout the county in all 5 the fire stations. 6 This is the last little piece. This is the 7 last unfinished bit, and what we have are two 8 immovable forces. We have the fire service saying 9 we want to be able to -- we want to be considered 10 equal to the paramedics in Collier County 11 Emergency Medical Service. 12 Dr. Tober, you can -- you can agree with what 13 he says or disagree with what he says. He's not 14 moving. He hasn't moved. I think that his logic 15 is not. I don't find what he's saying, 16 that less is better, that -- being logical. 17 Somehow or other, it makes me think that I'm being 18 snowed under, have a pillow case put over my head 19 or something. 20 But this is the last little piece. And we 21 have tried and we have mentioned this, and I've 22 heard Dr. Tober saying the same spiel for six 23 years, that it's just not going to happen. 24 As far as training is concerned, training is 25 one thing. Performing your job is another. When A (/ ,. L-. '<< , ,:,~"" 97 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 you talk -- riding on an ambulance -- a firefighter riding on an ambulance for three months out of the year is not training. That's work. I believe that as far as training is concerned, we need to train our people to those particular levels, any level that they're capable of learning. Train them to that level and let them practice at that level, period. I mean it's that simple. It's what we do with firefighters. It's our -- our businesses aren't that dissimilar. So if part of that training that you're putting out there saying -- and we1re saying we can't do or won1t do, if part of that training is our people riding on your ambulances for three months out of the year, that's not training. Thatrs work. We're supplementing your work force that way. That's wrong. I think developing an actual training program is doable, and having our in-house trainers performing that so we don't put the burden on EMS. CHIEF PAGE, I would just encourage you to read the articles that he's reading off of and -- I mean, like Richmond, Virginia, their ambulance association is an 16/ .~ 98 1 accredited association. I think it's one of five 2 in the world. 3 (Inaudible) . UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, 4 CHIEF PAGE, They have ALS 5 engines also there, but their protocol is limited. 6 They're limited with what equipment they have. 7 The only way they can maintain their certs is to 8 work eight hours a month on an EMS unit. 9 So I mean, other medical directors have these 10 same kind of requirements, but none of that1s done 11 here. I mean -- 12 GAIL DOLAN, Do they have a 13 medical director? 14 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE, Yeah. 15 GAIL DOLAN, The fire 16 department has a medical -- 17 CHIEF PAGE, Oh, no, no. 18 Therers one medical director in the county. 19 JIM MCEVOY, I can show you 15 20 articles that are going to tell you that 21 fire-based ALS delivery is the best way to do it. 22 Are you necessarily going to believe that? 23 GAIL DOLAN: So it's 24 totally -- 25 JIM MCEVOY: Just because I give '/; f ~'<c A 6 99 1 you 15 articles to read on it, I mean, you can 2 read articles, pros and con, and all that stuff. 3 I mean, you know, CHIEF PAGE: 4 we can talk all day. We do. 5 JEFF ALLBRITTEN, We're clearly, in 6 the section of board member discussion. And-- 7 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Okay. Never 8 mind. 9 -- while I not JEFF ALLBRITTEN, 10 to be (inaudible) by the way, 11m on vacation 11 today. You can tell. This is very interesting. 12 I'm learning a great deal. But is there -- if we 13 wish to continue, we certainly can, but 11m not 14 sure where we're going in terms of resolving. It 15 is interesting. 16 Yes, mar am. 17 I just have one KATHLEEN MARR, 18 question for Chief Page. 19 Jeff, has there ever been any consideration 20 to tiering the level of fire/medic response, since 21 we can't get everyone the experience that they 22 need? So -- and your medical protocol is under 23 fire EM -- fire, medic response. 24 CHIEF PAGE: How do you mean? 25 I'm not sure I understood your question. 161 ~ " '') 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 100 KATHLEEN MARR, Based on your level of experience. So you could have two protocols for fire medic one, fire medic two based on your level of experience. They could respond to a higher level on scene. CHIEF PAGE, Well-- KATHLEEN MARR, Like ladder. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE, Right. CHIEF PAGE, I think the ALS engine, the way that he set it up, and you guys correct me if I'm wrong on this part, but the ALS engine med box is set up to where he feels that they can reach in that protocol, the whole protocol, and is geared toward that. And I believe what he has said in the past is, at the point you can show me that therels a need for this bottom rung here, then we'll provide it, if units are taking too long or whatever. Now, as far as the 12 lead versus four lead monitors, I think thatts more of a cost saving. Why would you buy a $32,000 monitor if, in the first five to ten minutes, you1ve got a four lead that can defibrillate. I mean, usually, that diagnosis and that far into the protocol is doing -- going -- or happening during the transport. 't/A L V U ,~...... 101 1 Not so much on scene. 2 So as far I think, like Jim said, welre 3 very much further ahead than we were even two 4 years ago. And I think, as time marches on, as 5 this system gets bigger, because when we first 6 started and there was 40 employees, that was easy 7 to man and control. But when you get over to 8 Miami Dade and you've got thousands of employees, 9 your protocol starts to get a little bit more 10 controlled and you're asking for more permissions 11 because you canlt, obviously, keep track of all 12 these paramedics and get to know them as well as 13 the medical director. 14 So we -- back when we started, we had 15 different protocols level. We had a -- our own 16 paramedics were able to operate under the -- like 17 a substandard protocol, they could operate under, 18 start IVs, do things like that. Then there was a 19 more advanced protocol. 20 So we had two protocols in the past within 21 our own system, because back then, the day you got 22 your license, you're in the back of the truck with 23 an EMT, and youlre on your own. That's evolved 24 now to so much training and everything else now, 25 that -- I don't know. I just -- you're saying you A /? ,"_.,~ 16') ~ L ,;, !..l! 102 1 need Oxytocin. I don't know why you do, but I 2 mean 3 JIM MCEVOY, I don't even know 4 what it is. 5 CHIEF PAGE, I know, but why are 6 you fighting for it? If you don't -- I mean, I 7 know you're not a paramedic, but what 11m saying 8 is I think there's probably 11 drugs you guys 9 don't have. Some of those, we have not used in a 10 whole quarter ourselves. I mean, is there really 11 a need to have it just to say you have it? 12 JIM MCEVOY, I think it's -- 13 it's -- it's beneficial to everybody, all 14 stakeholders, if all the paramedics know what they 15 are, know how to use them. (Inaudible) 16 CHIEF PAGE, And you know I'm 17 not opposed to that. I mean 18 GAIL DOLAN, See what I mean? 19 Those kind of things (inaudible). 20 CHIEF PAGE: Look, I'm not -- 21 it's his license he's practicing -- I mean, 22 everybody is working under his license. My guys 23 are a little upset, the fact that fire guys get to 24 do more without or basically being credentialed 25 without having to go through FTOs and things like 1~1 { "~ , , . 103 1 that. And that's just part of it. 2 NANCY LASCHEID, I don't think 3 that conversation really can go further without 4 him having the opportunity to address it. I mean, 5 thatrs exactly where we were on October 30th. 6 Thatrs why we were here today. Unfortunately 7 JEFF ALLBRITTEN, I think today has 8 been a good learning experience. Everybody had a 9 chance to be, you know, perhaps a little tense in 10 our debate, but I would, one, like to move on and 11 end this if possible, because I donlt think 12 (inaudible) . 13 Next meeting date, according to the schedule 14 that Jennifer shared with us, January 30th. 15 Thatrs to be voted on. We have to decide -- poor 16 Jennifer (inaudible). 17 JENNIFER FLORIN, It was just 18 something that I put together. You can decide to 19 keep it that way. You can decide to move it. 20 Itrs whatever you guys want to do. 21 JEFF PANOZZO, Good. Last few 22 (inaudible) the other one didn't work out. So we 23 have to make an exact date (inaudible). 24 JEFF ALLBRITTEN, Trying to stick to 25 something like this is easier (end of audio.) 11., ",..' 104 1 2 3 CERTIFICATE 4 5 State of Florida 6 County of Collier 7 8 I, JOYCE B. HOWELL, Notary Public in and for the 9 State of Florida at Large, certify that I transcribed 10 the foregoing proceedings from an audio CD, and that 11 the transcript and speaker identification is a true and 12 correct record of said proceedings to the best of my 13 ability. 14 15 I further certify that I am not a relative, 16 employee, attorney or counsel of any of the parties, 17 nor am I a relative or employee of any of the parties, 18 attorney or counsel connected with the action, nor am I 19 financially interested in the action. 20 21 Dated this 8th day of January, 2008. 22 23 24 Joyce B. Howell Notary Public State of Florida at Large 25 A 6 16." t~ 17 -il,.. ,. '.'~ ,:"~,, ."'t f~ I, f "'iala ~~.\\: \)\. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ADVISORY COUNCIL 'Halas ~L . --.-' (EMSAC) H. enning-- .:fr.- 1--., SUB-COMMITTEE coyle .. ';l - .' Coletta ,~._._u. January 17,2008 COLLIER COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES HEADQUARTERS 2705 S Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 District 1 Commission District - Victoria DiNardo, Present District 4 Commission District - Nancy Lascheid, Vice Chairman, Present City of Marco Island Fire/Rescue - Michael Murphy, Chief, Present Physician's Regional Medical Center - Dr. Jeffrey Panozzo, Present The regular meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Nancy Lascheid. A quorum was present at this time. NEW BUSINESS: Nancy started off the meeting by asking that the Subcommittee agree on a mission statement, and also identify three to five goals that they can work towards. She also asked that we keep everyone's comments to two minutes each, so as to keep the meeting flowing nicely. Chief Murphy stated that he felt concern that there are some things left out of the Master Plan, and also has concern that the Productivity Committee will look at this and have a completely different idea and direction than we would. Therefore it was agreed that the mission would be to assess the Master Plan from each person's specialty and background, and relate it strictly to EMS. It was also agreed that the following would be the goals of the group: I. Feasibility; 2. Financial Aspect; and 3. Improvements. The two concerns that stood out for Nancy in regard to the feasibility of the plan were the population increase and expansion of a rural area. The aging population and demographics would be a concern that falls under population increase. Nancy also stated a concern that the plan didn't relate at all to was young families. Chief Murphy also agreed brining up Ave Maria, which is a growing community for young families. Nancy also referenced page 176 half way down on recommendations it states to "utilize the facilities offered at Ave Maria." She stated that was the only place in the plan that referenced Ave Maria at all. She also stated that Ave Maria would also fall under the topic of expansion of rural areas. Chief Murphy also brought up the 1-75 corridor. Nancy asked Chief Page about how many people annually were transported to the trauma center. He stated that it is below 300, somewhere around 286, he thought. She stated that it doesn't seem to be addressed in the plan; however we would have to anticipate a trauma aspect. The situation on 1-4 recently was brought up, where there was a 70 car pile-up. Chief Murphy stated that there are calls there everyday, even if they aren't necessarily trauma. It was agreed that we do need to look at the trauma aspect also. Dr Panozzo had a suggestion that we get a clear and concise idea of wllere we are Iv \ AU:> heading as a group; then break to allow the members to really go throu~tlrgrrtWan and Ollie: Item#: ~CJ,:'~' tc ./ 1 6 i .1'l ,? ...i ie, i,'.i, ~",) analyze it all. Then when we come back everyone will be more prepared to talk about the goals of the group. He sug~ested meeting again as a subcommittee before the regular EMSAC meeting on Jan. 30'. He stated that he wasn't sure he could go much further in to the details of the plan without having an idea of where the group wants to end up in the long run. He feels that if there is a target, then people will be able to give a more meaningful opinion when we re-convene. He also wanted to add the analysis of the Executive Summary of the plan into the mission statement of the group. It was agreed upon that the Executive Summary at the beginning and the recommendations at the end are the real contents of the plan, and everything in the middle is just back-up material. Chief Murphy added that what the group could do would be to put their thoughts together and submit them to Jennifer to distribute to the other subcommittee members. Then each person would have a chance to review everyone's ideas and have a clear idea of what they want to talk about at the next meeting. It was agreed that everyone come back with something very detailed and in a timely manner. Chief Page stated that the difference between the size of the plan and the size of the actual material presented to the consultants was very significant. He stated that if any member would like some additional information on anything in the plan to feel free to ask, and we would supply that information. Nancy asked that a deadline be set of Tuesday the 22nd to get the correspondence to Jennifer so she can distribute it out to the other subcommittee members. Moving on to the next goal of financial aspects, Nancy brought up what she understood to be the three resources we currently have: User Fees, Ad Valorum taxes, and Impact fees. She stated that she was worried about how vulnerable we are when it comes to ad valorum taxes and impact fees with the way the economy is right now. Chief Page explained that a perfect example is the growth units that were recommended in this study, hasn't' been granted even this year. Nancy stated she thinks we need realistic with the limitations of resources. She feels that we need to be frugal with the recommendations due to the demands of funding. Dr Panozzo feels we shouldn't limit our financial advice for other sources of revenue or other options of obtaining revenue. Nancy felt that we should only look at sources that are realistic and not use our time to propose something that is unrealistic. Chief Murphy added that we should add concerns on limitations as a subcategory for the financial aspect. However we should try to think of other funding sources. That maybe someone can come up with something that is viable. Chief Murphy stated that what he thought was being said was that there are limitations and the new tax structure will have a large impact. He felt that what he thought Dr Panozzo was saying was that we still have to be concerned with the level of service, however there is no money. He stated that a good example is Ave Maria, we can't really be frugal and say that we don't think they should go there, we should try to be creative and think of additional funding options for them. Or make a statement that we feel it has to be funded. Another example we could use would be to say that trauma needs to be looked at, and then let the financial people look at it from their point. Finally the last goal is improvements. Chief Murphy stated that the recommendations section states a few things that can be considered improvements. He feels there were some components that were left out of the plan all together. The example he gave was Port of the Isles; which was not mentioned at all. He requested some general ideas on improvements. Nancy requested that in each person's statement to 16/ A 6 Jennifer that they identify three specific ideas on improvements. She requested to have it limited to three to allow for time to discuss each. In recapping each goal she wanted to be clear in that she didn't want the discussion on improvements to take us away from the fact that we have an excellent program in place. She doesn't want to get tied up on things that we got tied up on in the last meeting. Chief Murphy agreed that we need to look at the big picture. Nancy wanted to talk a minute about the trauma aspect. She stated that her background is in trauma and she understands that 300 cases annually is not that many, however it will increase over time. Chief Murphy stated that even though there are only 300, there are cases and calls everyday with car accidents or overturned vehicles. The number of occurrences is very high. He feels that our aspect should be to bring it to the table for discussion. He stated there was some talk about a station out there. He stated that the risk factor is very high, and just because there are only 300 patients who meet the criteria of trauma, there are still calls out there everyday. Nancy wanted to add preparing for trauma to the improvements goal. Dr Panozzo also wanted to add pandemic and mass casualty in with trauma. Nancy stated that she attended a presentation and had material at home that she would bring with her on that. Chief Page explained what he wanted to see come out of this. He stated that he feels he knows where the Productivity Committee will stand on this, because he has dealt with them in the past. Their main focus will be unit hour utilization, fiscal impact, such as buying different types of transport vehicles. They are also going to look at system status models versus what we currently provide. He asked that when the group goes through these things he asked that they keep in mind the Productivity Committee will be reviewing the financial aspects and also how we do business day to day. Examples might be staffing levels and when and where they are staffed. He stated that the pandemic aspect would maybe be better for the entire EMSAC body. Chief Murphy asked that Chief Page draw up a few questions or "what ifs" that he feels the Productivity Committee will bring up. Then we can use those questions as our fourth issue or goal to go over. Chief Page thought that was a good idea because he identified some areas or issues that they might come up with. Chief Page asked Chief Murphy if he could share the letter that he wrote him after the Master Plans were initially handed out. Chief Murphy stated that it was kind of an overview letter and that he would have his secretary email it. Chief Murphy asked Dr Panozzo that if he wanted anything added to his response cards that he sends to all the patients to reference his hospital to email those to his secretary. Nancy asked Chief Page a question regarding the Executive Summary for the Fire Consolidation report and when the meeting took place. Chief Page explained that the report was a result of several meetings of the Operations Committee which none of the Fire Chief's sat on. It was a meeting of other Chief's (Battalion Chief's, etc.) and this is a result of what they would like to see in consolidation. Each Chief had to provide any information that they requested. Also that report was going before the Fire Steering Committee tonight. Meeting Adjourned 161A 6 The next meeting will be held on January 28, 2008 at 2:00pm. Respectfully Submitted, Jennifer Florin Breakdown Mission: To conduct a complete analysis of the Master Plan; focusing on the three goals stated; which to include the Executive Summary and the Recommendations sections of the Master Plan. Goals: 1. Feasibility a. Population Increase -Aging population & Demographics b. Expansion of rural areas -Ave Maria -1-75 Corridor 2. Financial Aspect a. Concerns on limitations b. Ideas for additional funding sources 3. Improvements a. General Concepts b. preparing for Trauma c. Utilization d. New/Left out Sites 4. Productivity Ouestions from Chief Page / ':f'" 'V Date Adopted: -;/") . - C ?J (. / ~. //', '/ . ~ />''':r' / 7, A'~ / / / :8'r/!~ff/ Vice/-3j.rriian /Cmirfcil MemberSignature / , Fia;a' .._.~ W.~._. ___. Halasn..;. ---- Henning_ ---r_ coyleJ7f . .--- Coletta .. ---~-- ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCil 16~1 A 7 AGENDA (Revised Dec. 28, 2007) Monday, January 7, 2008 9:00 A.M. Commission Boardroom W. Harmon Turner Building (Building "F") - Third Floor I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of November 7, 2006 meeting minutes V. Upcoming Environmental Advisory Council Absences VI. land Use Petitions A. Planned Unit Development PUDZ.2006.AR.9143 Standing Oaks RPUD Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East B. Plat and Construction Plans PPl-2006-AR-9975 Mockingbird Crossing Section 36, Township 48 South, Range 26 East VII. New Business lDC amendment for Special Cycle 2008-1 a (Florida Rock Industries, Inc.) I. Old Business A. Update members on projects II. Subcommittee Reports III. Staff Comments A. Ethics: Conflict of Interest - Jeff Wright B. Rem inder - Check with staff before amending agenda and vote is needed to amend agenda C. RlSA presentation in November is 3-4 hours. Schedule a full day at a regular meeting or have a special session? IV. Council Member Comments A. Water Use - Richard Miller Misc. Com!s I ~ I It 1 Date: V. Public Comments :tem# VI. Adjournment ******************************************************************* Council Members: Please notifv Summer Araaue. Environmental Services Senior Environmental Scecialist no later than 5:00 C.m. on Januarv 2. 2008 if you cannot attend this meetina or if yOU have a conflict and will abstain from votina on a cetition (530-6290\. General Public: Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto; and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. j 16/ .il .)\ n '7 J Text underlined is new text to be added. T81:1 stril,stRf9iJijR ie: SImeR! t8Xt t8 99 gelated. Bold text indicates a defined term LDC Amendment Rellnest ORIGIN: Florida Rock Industries, Inc. Private Petition AUTHOR: Doug Lewis and Bruce Anderson in Consultation with County Staff. DEPARTMENT: Transportation Division. AMENDMENT CYCLE: 2008 Special Cycle la LDC PAGE: LDC1:5-6 LDC SECTION(S): 1.04.04 Reduction of Required Site Design Requirements CHANGE: Add that reduction of minimum size, dimension or area of existing yards, lots or parcels is prohibited except where a portion thereof is being acquired for a present or planned public use andlor purpose by the County or another governmental entity or by a private party under an agreement with the County or other governmental entity. This exception already exists in LDC for acquisitions and condemnation by government or dedication to government The amendment merely adds that the exception also applies where a private party is acting on behalf of government. The amendment also provides that such reduction shall not effect the eligibility of the lot or parcel to sever Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Credits where the reduction occurs as a result of acquisition for a present or planned public use andlor purpose by the County or another governmental entity or by a private party under an agreement with the County or another governmental entity. REASON: To encourage property owners to sell for purposes of public right of way, their lands for the southern and western portions of the Wilson Boulevard Extension depicted in the North Belle Meade Overlay of the Growth Management Plan. The purpose is to leave owners of Rural Fringe Sending Lands in the same legal position after an acquisition, of their lot or parcel for a public use and/or purpose, as the lands were prior to the acquisition. FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS: This will significantly reduce the costs of acquisition of rights of way for a public use andlor purpose within Rural Fringe Sending Lands, because the County will only be paying for the land not for severance damages for TDRs that could no longer be severed from such lots or parcels because of the reduction in size as a result of the acquisition by or on behalf of the County. RELATED CODES OR REGULATIONS: Subsection 2.03.07 D. 4. Transfer of Development Rights (TOR). GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT: None. OTHER NOTESNERSION DATE: December 20, 2007 Amend the LDC as follows: 1.04.04 Reduction of Required Site Design Requirements 1 C:\Documents and Settings\mendicino ~ c\Desktop\NAPLES-#543514-v1-LDC _Amendment_ Request~ 122007 .DOC 16/ A ? Text underlined is new text to be added. Text l;;tr:iketl:II:Sblri!lR;E CblIT9r:1t fe-xl tg 139 9slstBfl. Bold text indicates a defined term A. No part of a required yard, required open space, required off-street parking space, or required off-street loading space, provided in connection with one building, structure, or use shall be included as meeting the requirements for any other, structure, or use, except where specific provision is made in this LDC. B. Minimum standards; nonconformities created by public acquisition. 1. All lots or yards created after the effective date of this Code [Feb. 14, 2006] must comply with the requirements then established by this Code. 2. No lot, even though it may consist of one or more abutting lots of record, or yard, existing at the effective date of this Code [Feb. 14, 2006J or lawfully existing on the effective date [Feb. 14, 2006J of applicable amendments to this Code shall thereafter be reduced in its degree of compliance, including its size, dimension, or area, below the minimum requirements then set forth in this Code, except by reason of a portion thereof being acquired for present or planned public use and/or purpose by Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by a private party under an aqreement with Collier County or another qovernmental entity in any manner, including dedication, condemnation, purchase, and the like. a. Required yards on improved lots , lot area, lot coverage on improved lots, and lot dimensions rendered nonconforming or more legally nonconforming as a result of being acquired faf public ~se, by Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by a private party under an aqreement with Collier County or another qovernmental entity may be reduced by the same dimension, area, or amount invoived in the dedication, condemnation, purchase, or similar method of acquisition fur p~blic ~se, but shall not result in a front yard of less than ten feet (10') in depth. Accordingly, the resulting degree of nonconformity of the area and dimensions of a lot and the required yards with this Code's then current requirements will be deemed lawful unless or until the remaining lot or yard is recreated, typically by re-development, re-piat or lot re-combination, at which time such lots and yards must comply with the requirements then established by this Code. Further, no conforming lot otherwise qualifying for a lot split or lot line adjustment pursuant to Section 10.02.02. B.8; 10.02.02, B.12, 1.04.04 or 9.03.03.A 5 may be denied such approval solely on the grounds that the resulting lot or lots would be less than the required minimum area for such lot(s) in the applicable zoning district as a resuit of acquisition, from Feb. 14, 2006. b. Other existing site related legal nonconformities, including those rendered more nonconforming as a result of acquisition-fGf p~l3lic ~S8 by Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by a private party under an aqreement with Collier County or another qovernmental entity and which pertain to this Code's or other county code requirements, such as, but not limited to, stormwater 2 C:\Documents and Settings\mendicino _ c\Desktop\NAPLES.#543514-v1-LDC _Amendment_ Request_ 122007 .DOC ... f. ~ /i1 .1L tJ! Ii -" (' Text underlined is new text to be added. Text Etriksthrswgl:l i& G\.IrrSAt text 19 139 deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term management, landscaping or buffers, preserves, on- or off-site parking, architectural design standards, etc., will be deemed legally nonconforming ,and all such resulting nonconformities may be allowed to remain so nonconforming , unless or untii the remaining lot or yard is subsequently re-created or re- developed, at which time such site related nonconformities and development must comply with the then existing requirements of this Code. c. In those circumstances where acquisition for p~I3IiG ~S8 by Collier County or another oovernmental entity or by a private party under an aoreement with Collier County or another qovernmental entity of a portion of a lot or yard would result in one or more nonconformities that would require approvai of a development order or permit in order to implement the terms of the acquisition, i.e., in order to cure or remedy the effect of an acquisition, (e.g., an SOP or building permit required to relocate a prior existing building ), the County manager, or designee, is authorized to approve such development order or permit so long as any prior existing legal nonconformity of the type set forth in b. above would not be increased. d. A leqal non-conforminq lot or parcel of less than five (5) acres that was in existence as of June 22. 1999 which is reduced in size or rendered more non-conforminq as a result of a portion thereof beinq acquired bY Collier County or another oovernmental entity or by a private party under an aoreement with Collier County or another qovernmental entity, may be leoally reduced by the same dimension. area. or amount involved in the dedication. condemnation. purchase or similar method of acquisition by Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by a private party under an aqreement with Collier County or another qovernmental entity and the resultinq lot(s) or parcel(s) not acouired by Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by a private party under an aoreement with Collier County or another oovernmental entity shall be deemed a leqally non-confirminq iot or parcel of less than five (5) acres entitled to severance of base and bonus TOR credits at a rate of 1 TOR credit per leqal non-conforminq lot or parcel pursuant to Section 2.03.07 O. 4. of the LOC. A lot or parcel five (5) acres or larqer which is reduced in size as a result of a portion thereof beinq acquired by Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by a private party under an aqreement with Collier County or another qovernmental entity. may be leoally reduced by the same dimension. area. or amount invoived in the dedication. condemnation. purchase or simiiar method of acouisition by Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by a private party under an aqreement with Collier County or another oovernmental entity and the number of base and bonus TOR credits oenerated from such resultino lot(s) or parcel(s) not acquired by Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by a private party under an aoreement with Collier County or another qovernmental entity shall be calculated pursuant to Section 2.03.07 O. 4. of the LOC 3 C:\Documents and Settings\mendicino ~ c\Desktop\NAPLES-#543514-v1-LDC _ Amendment_RequesC 122007 .DOC 16/ A ? based on the lot or parcel dedication. condemnation. acquisition. Text underlined is new text to be added. Text driketl:II:S6I8R i& GblFr9F1t text t9 be geleted. Bold text indicates a defined term acreaqe which existed prior to the purchase or similar method of 3. This section may be applied to those acquisitions occurring prior to the adoption of this ordinance so long as the purchase or dedication of the property has not closed, or the condemnation proceeding relating to the property acquired has not reached final disposition. C. Other than provided for immediately above, required off-street parking shall not be reduced in area or changed to any other use unless the permitted or permissible use that it serves is discontinued or modified, or equivalent required off-street parking is provided meeting the requirements of this LOC. 4 C:\Documents and Settings\mendicino _ c\Desktop\NAPLES-#543514-v1-LDC _ AmendmenC Request_ 122007. DOC ~ Fiala .-' -.-- Halas '~1t-- Hennlng17t:~--.. Coyle -]~ -- Coletta-+- .----- 16/ A .& October 30,2007 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY FIRE REVIEW TASK FORCE Naples, Florida, October 30, 2007 RECEIVED JAN 2 2 2008 Board or County C:ommissioners LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Fire Review Task Force, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, Met on this date at 1:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier County Community Development and Environmental Services Division Conference Room #609/610, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, With the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Bradley Schiffer VICE CHAIRMAN: William Varian Gary Beaumont James Boughton Dalas Disney J. Christopher Lombardo William Schreck Chuck McMahon(Excused) Angela Davis(Excused) STAFF PRESENT: Bob Dunn - Interim Building Official Jeff Wright - Assistant County Attorney Ed Riley - Fire Code Official Ricco Longo - Deputy Fire Code Official Paula Brethauer - Operations Analyst Bob Salvaggio - Fire Code Official Jeremy Johnson - Deputy Fire Code Offici~. c I', I A g k. d I . d ffi ISC. orres L( Jac Ie e a Osa - Deputy Fire Co e 0 Icia Paul Mattausch - Director, Utilities Dept. Date Item#: '=G~;es to J 16/ October 30, 24 8 I. Call Meeting to Order The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bradley Schiffer at 1:01 P,M. II. Roll Call Roll Call was taken with a quorum established. III. Approval ofthe Agenda There were no changes to the agenda. IV. Approval of Minutes A. Review Methods Sue Chapin of Mancan appeared before the Task Force and provided a summary of Roberts Rules of Order including procedures for calling meetings to order, quorums, motions, minutes, etc. A Mancan document entitled "Collier County Advisory Board Meetings, Summary of Roberts Rules of Order Presentation" dated 2006 was submitted to the Task Force for future reference. Mr. Lombardo arrived at 1:20 PM. B. September 28, 2007 Mr. Beaumont moved to approve the minutes of the September 28, 2007 meeting subject to the following corrections. Page 2, Old Business, Fire Flow Comments, line I , Mr. Holt to "Mr. Holt's Staff'. Second by Mr. Disney. Carried unanimously7-0. C. October 8, 2007 Mr. Schreck moved to approve the minutes of the October 8,2007 meeting. Second by Mr. Disney. Carried unanimously 7-0. V. Old Business Comments (topics will be reviewed at future meetings) A. Water Supply None B. Alarm Systems & Monitoring Mr. Beaumont noted the requirement to obtain a permit and inspection for replacing items in existing systems is time consuming and costly for the owner. Mr. Riley stated that if the same make and model item is used in the replacement no permit is required and is categorized as "maintenance". Different make and model replacement components require review to ensure compliance with the existing system, Mr. Disney noted that proyiding a published list of acceptable cross referenced components for replacement items would be a possible solution to the issue. 2 16) A 8 Octobcr 30, 2007 Mr. Riley notcd this may be acceptable ifit is not a power consuming dcvice. Hc is looking at ways to streamline this process. C. Permit Process Mr. Schreck submitted draft flow charts entitled "Collier County Permit Proccss" including the "original flow chart", "suggcsted rcvised flow" and "correction or reyision flow" for review by the Task Force and Staff Mr. Boughton requested clarification regarding permission to categorize building construction type's one category for building code reviews and another category for fire flow reviews. Mr. Schiffer noted that the building needs to be categorized as one construction type throughout the review process. Mr. Dunn stated that Staff has terminated the requirement for a letter of explanation for "not applicable" checklist items. VI. New Business A. Florida Administrative Code 61G15.32 Process Mr. Schiffer submitted Section 6] G15.30 and 61 G 15.32 of the Florida Administratiye Code to thc Task Force for reyiew. B. Fire Sprinklers Submittal/Review Process Jeremy Johnson and Jackie de la Osa submitted the 61G-15 Submittal Requirements - Sprinklers checklist for review by the Task Force. Ms. de la Osa noted that the chccklist is a synopsis of the requirements of Section 61 G 15-32.003 "Common Requirements to All Fire Protection Engineering Documents." The following was noted; · The quality of information submitted with the initial submittal is poor, including checklist items missing, technical data omissions, missing or outdated flow tests rcsults, etc. · The flow tests are required to be conducted within 6 months of the submittal date of the application which has been established as a Department policy to ensurc accurate flow tests rcsults as requircd under the "Utility Standards Manual" updated 2006. · In accordance with NFP A 13, the application review requires an actual flow test result as opposed to a computer modcl result. Break 2:35 P.M. Re-convene 2:50 P.M. A discussion occurred regarding the submittal requirements for structural support and structural openings required undcr Section 61G-]532.003-(5) (number 3 of the checklist). Mr. Riley noted that he would review these requirements as they apply to pre- engineered structures vs. indiyidually designed structures. 3 ~Q"" ,A 0 I '+ , oj ber 30, 200~ Ms. de la Osa noted that in general the applications for sprinkler systems do not hold up the overall permit issuance. In addition, "material deviations" (layout documents or "shop drawings" that are different from the 61G-15 submittal) issues are not a large problem with sprinkler system applications. Mr. Beaumont noted that the extensive information required by the Fire Alarm 61G-15 submittal may be causing the "material deviation" issues with the shop drawings submitted with the Fire Alarm permit application. Mr. Longo noted that the actual requirements for Fire Alarm submittals are outlined in 6IG-15.33.006. C. Inspections Continued to the next agenda. D. Revisions Continued to the next agenda. VII. Public Comments James Ditaranto of Commercial Electrical Systems appeared before the Task Force and expressed concerns over the oyerall Fire Code permit process in Collier County and lack of continuity between the Building Department and Fire Code Review. Numerous times the building is nearly completed before the 61 G submittal is approved. In most cases the Fire Alarm Contractors are not involved until the end of the permit/construction phase as opposed to the beginning and this creates "material deviation" issues in shop drawing submittals. For project estimates in Collier County he allows for 40% of the overall bid cost for permit approvals, in other Counties he allows 2%. Many Contractors are no longer working in this County due to these factors. With regard to Fire Alarm permits, other Counties do not have an extensive checklist and general building permits are not issued until6lG's are approved. Requirements of 61 G submittals requirements are a matter of interpretation and are different in the yarious Counties. Mr. Boughton inquired how projects are allowed to initiate construction before issuance of building permits. Mr. Riley stated in the past, buildings have been started under "early start letters" or "phase permits" which allows initiation of construction without complete permit approval. He further noted Staff is reviewing ways to improve the Fire Alarm permit process. Mr. Schiffer noted a possible solution to document conflicts between the two submittals (61 G and the subsequent shop drawing for specialty permits) is not requiring drawings for the 61 G submittal. Mr. Longo stated that the 61 G-15.33.006 requires drawings for some of the items listed. If feasible, he would be in favor of one application submittal process. Mr. Lombardo lef! the meeting at 3:50 P.M. 4 16 I oct1er 30~007 Mr. Dunn stated that the recent policy for the Building Department is not allowing issuance of any commercial permits without the Fire Department approval. This includes "early work permits". All Fire Alarm fees go to the Fire Department. Mr. Disney left the meeting at 4:0(} P.M. VIII. Review of available dates and topics for future meetings for November, December and January Mr. Shiffer stated the Committee Strategy will be fact-finding meetings for the remainder of the calendar year and review the local Ordinance in January. The next meeting will be November 30th, I ;00 P.M. The December meeting is scheduled for December 14, I ;00 P.M. The January meeting is scheduled for January 18th 1 ;00 P.M. A quorum was lost at 4: 18 P.M. Assistant County Attorney Jeff Wright noted the Committee may hear speakers with discussion; however no oflicial action can be taken. Speakers Louis Roderiquez of Coastal Fire Protections noted that the Staff consider the "material deviations" be handled in letter format as opposed to drawing revisions. Bob Dimodica of Naples Fire Sprinkler stated that the Task Force should review the permit fee requirements for sprinkler installations and there needs to be a continuity of inspection procedures within the County. Michael Vidal of West Coast Fire Protection stated many of the problems of submittals and "material deyiations," etc. is caused by consultants not familiar with the process of submitting applications. There being no further business for the good ofthe County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair at 4:40 P.M. Collier Coun Fire Review Task Force ~ Bradley Schi er, Chairman These minutes app;:oved by the Board/Committee on as presented V or as amended .. 5 16'"./ A n it><{ November 30, 2007''? Fiala Hcdqs He" COyiE Coletta LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Fire Review 1?fs'ltfCountycornmissloners OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY FIRE REVIEW TASK FORCE - Naples, Florida, November 30, 2007 RECE!VED IAN 2 2 2008 Force, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, Met on this date at I :00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier County Community Development Environmental Services Conference Room #609/610,2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, With the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Bradley Schiffer VICE CHAIRMAN: William Varian Gary Beaumont James Boughton Dalas Disney (absent) J. Christopher Lombardo (absent) William Schreck Chuck McMahon Angela Davis OTHERS PRESENT: Bob Dunn, Acting Building Official Jeff Wright, Assistant County Attorney Ed Riley, Fire Code Official Ricco Longo, Deputy Fire Code Official Paula Brethauer, Operations Analyst Nick Biondo, East Naples Fire Marshal Bob Salvaggio, Fire Code Official Karl Reynolds, North Naples Fire Dept. Tom Cannon, East Naples Fire District Commissioner Jackie de la Osa, Deputy Fire Code Official (j Joyceanna J. Rautio, Facilitator Fire S~bC&n-es lee, \ fr () Steering Committee Date: item#: r:c?ie,; tcJ' J 161 'I I-~ 8 Noyember 30,2007 I. Call Meeting to Order The meeting was called to order at I ;04 PM by Chairman Schiffer. II. Roll Call Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. III. Approval of Agenda Mr. Varian moved to approve the agenda. Second by Mr. Schreck. Carried unanimously 6-0. IV. Approval of Minutes A. October 30, 2007 Mr. Varian moved to approve the minutes of the October 30,2007 meeting subject to the following changes: Page 2, V. "topics will be reviewed at future meetings" to "topics at past meetings. " Carried unanimously 6-0. V. Old Business (topics from past meetings) A. Water Supply Water flow study to be reviewed under VI. D B. Alarm Systems and Monitoring Ricco Longo, Deputy Fire Code Official submitted a document outlining the changes in the Florida Administrative Code Section 61 G 15-32.001 _ 32.003 General Responsibility providing requirements for Engineered Drawings for Fire Alarm Application requirements. C. Permit Process None. D. Florida Administrative Code 61G15.32 Process None. E. Fire Sprinklers None. VI. New Business A. Fire Sprinkler Inspections No concerns were brought forth in this area. B. Fire Sprinkler Revisions No concerns were brought forth in this area. C. Building Official and Fire Official areas of Governing Code review. Chairman Shiffer asked if there are areas where the Goyerning Codes conflict in requirements and if there are redundant reviews of applications. He cited Section 4611 of the Fire Prevention Code which addresses conflicts in Codes and resolutions. Ed Riley, Fire Code Official noted there are areas of overlap in the Life Safety Codes and Building Codes and if necessary there is an avenue of resolution. To date it has not created a large problem for permit issuances. 2 161~1f "8 November 30,2007 Mr. McMahon joined the meeting at I: 15 PM Mr. Schreck asked ifthere is a way that the Fire Department plan reyiew and Building Code plan review could be conducted simultaneously as opposed to the Building Department having 20 days to review, then the Fire Department having 20 days to review. Bill Dunn stated he has been working on this for 7 months, attempting to combine the 20-day requirement for both jurisdictions and has recently re- started this procedure and it is working well to date. Ed Riley noted that this is the requirement in the Fire District, Collier County inter-local agreement; however, this procedure was previously halted by Tom Hammond. SPEAKERS James Ditaranto of Commercial Electrical Services, addressed the Task Force noting that it is a problem when the General Building Permit is issued first, then at a later date the Fire Alarm permits are applied for and issued. He recommended that Fire Alarm Permits be issued in conjunction with the General Building Permit. Chairman Schiffer noted that the current process is for a 61 G application to be submitted with related Fire Alarm documents as required under 61G, then if the 61 G is approved the Building Permit is issued. It is the responsibility of the Fire Code Otlice to review the 61 G submittal for Fire Code Compliance. Subsequent to this, the applicant is required to apply for a separate Fire Alarm Permit, Sprinkler Permits, etc. accompanied by "shop drawings" that must match the 61G approyal. Mr. Schreck noted that the "shop drawings" for Fire Alarm applications are generally created by the Fire Alarm Contractor who has a better working knowledge of systems creating a conflict with the original 61 G drawing requiring the applicant to seek one of the 4 processes of approval for a Material Deyiation. Ifboth permit applications were reviewed simultaneously it may help alleyiate these Material Deviations. A general discussion occurred in how other jurisdictions interpret the 61 G requirements (information, plan detail, etc.) and the timing of issuance of Building Permits, Fire Alarm Permits and related certifications by Engineers. Ed Riley requested citing specific examples of other jurisdiction's procedures for him to review; he is not aware of any jurisdictions that issue a permit on a 61G documents without working drawings. Further, all jurisdictions he is aware of issue separate Building and Fire Alarm permits. Tom Stasko, of Fire 1, noted that in his interpretation the 61G drawings are a guideline for the projects design, not a detailed construction plan intended for specialty permits. 3 16 J A 8 Noyember 30,2007 Mr. McMahon suggested requiring issuance of the Fire Alarm Permit before the Framing Inspection. Tom Cannon, Chairman of the East Naples Fire Control and Rescue District stated that the District is the Administrator of the Fire Code Officials Office. He further stated that by a unanimous vote of both the East Naples Fire Control District and the Steering Committee effective January 1,2008 terminated the unwritten inter-local agreement with the County as far as the Fire Code Office reviewing 6IG's. It will now be the responsibility of the Building Department. Ed Riley stated that the Fire Code Office will issue permits for Fire Alarm and Sprinkler systems with reviews limited to the shop drawings compliance with Fire and Life Safety Codes, not conformance with the 61 G submittal. This was the procedure prior to 200 I but was changed to the current process at the request of the building industry. He recommended a procedure where Specialty Permits applications and supporting plans (Fire Alarm, Sprinkler, etc.) are submitted with the 6 I G application and all permits be issued simultaneously. He further noted that the problem lies with the coordination of the owners, consultants and contractors in processing pennits. He will work to provide a smooth transition to the Building Department. Bob Dunn stated he was not aware of this decision and will set up a team immediately to address this transition. James Ditaranto of Commercial Electric Services raised questions regarding "as built" Fire Alarm drawings he proyides to field inspectors previous to inspections. Ed Riley recommended Mr. Ditaranto appear before the Fire Alarm Sub- Committee to resolye any questions regarding these issues. Break - 2:35PM Re-Convene - 2:55PM D. Fire Flow Studies Chairman Schiffer provided the results of the Fire Flow study conducted by himself and Mr. Riley which analyzed fire flow requirements for buildings utilizing the Collier County method, the Insurance Service Organization (ISO) Method and the NFPA appendix H method. The Philadelphia Baptist Church, Uno Chicago Grill, Collier County Parking Garage, Golden Gate Auto Zone and Waterside Parking Structure were used in the study. It was noted that consultants do not uniformly or correctly categorize building construction types and this should be addressed in the Standardized Plan Requirements. In general the Collier County flow requirements were less stringent than the ISO method, but more stringent than NFP A appendix H. It was noted that the ISO requirements do not provide for a sprinkler reduction factor; Collier County allows a 50 percent reduction in flows for buildings with sprinklers; NFP A allows for up to a 75 percent reduction in flows for buildings with sprinklers. 4 161 A 8 November 30, 2007 A discussion occurred on why parking garages haye similar flow requirements as office buildings, etc. Karl Reynolds of North Naples Fire Department stated that the flow requirements are similar as vehicles in parking structures contain a mass of combustible materials as well as combustible fuel which may cause extensive damage to structures or threaten life safety. Further, they may be adjacent to existing structures. Nick Biondo East Naples Fire District requested clarification of the goal of the study. He noted that the flow requirements of Collier County were previously studied and the process to formulate the standards received input from Steering Committees, District Fire Chiet's, Fire Marshall's, etc. and wanted to ensure this was brought back up in front of the Task Force before any recommendations were made in this area. He also stated he has a concern with the flow pressures provided to the system by the Utilities Department. Mr. Varian noted that the larger problem possibly originates in the flows that are provided by the Utilities Department and this should be addressed. Chairman Schiffer noted the submission of an email document regarding the fee structures in different County's. This document was sent anonymously. Ed Riley questioned the accuracy ofthe figures provided in the document. A discussion occurred whether reyiewing an anonymous authored document was appropriate. It was noted that the author was anonymous, as he "feared retaliation for himself or his business." Tom Cannon, Chairman, East Naples Fire Control and Rescue District stated that there is no retaliation, and if this is found, appropriate employee disciplinary actions would be taken. He follows up on all complaints he receIves. Mr. Beaumont noted that the subject of "retaliation" was not included in the resolution adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. Joyceanna J. Rautio, Facilitator of the Fire Service Steering Committee and an Underground Service Contractor addressed the Task Force. She stated that while working in the private sector she had heard of this issue and requested documentation from any contractors in the priyate sector but could never substantiate a claim to be brought forward to the Fire District. Further, it is not part of the Task Force Resolution. She also noted the Task Force should focus on the Utilities Departments delivery of flow pressures as this issue needs to be investigated and addressed. VII. Public Comments None 5 16 t~YembB30, 2007 VIII. Review offuture meetings/topics A. Friday, December 14,2007 IPM - SPM · Design Professional interface with Fire Official Otlice · General and Sub-Contractors interface with Fire Otlicial Office . Fire Districts B. Friday, January 18,2008 IPM - SPM . Permit process · Collier Local Amendments to the Florida Fire Prevention Code C. Friday, February 1,2008 IPM - SPM . Roundtable Discussions D. Friday, February 8, 2008 IPM - SPM . Roundtable Discussions . Establish Report Method E. Friday, February IS, 2008 IPM - SPM . Roundtable Discussions . Review Report Draft F. Friday, February 22, 2008 IPM - SPM . Roundtable Discussions . Review Report Draft G. Friday February 29, 2008 IPM - SPM . Review Final Report Draft H. Tuesday, March 18,2008 9AM - Noon . BCC/Fire Review Task Force Workshop There being no further business for the good of the ounty, the meeting was adjourned by order ofthe chair at 4:19 P.M. Collier Cou ty Fire Review Task Force ,-'. Bradley Scll ffer, Chairman These minutes approved by the Board/Committee 0 Id\I~/Dr 6 as presented or as amended ~. 7 I 6love4er 38007 ./ Ii. (y.Sf'" Flala\.t T.J.>- ~: ~~~jng~~~.....~ .::~~==:: Coyle .f-~~. Coletta. .... ... . MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY FIRE REVIEW TASK FORCE r;- 161 A 8 December 14,2007 Naples, Florida, December 14,2007 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Fire Review Task Force, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 1 :00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier County Community Development Environmental Services Conference Room #609/610,2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Bradley Schiffer VICE CHAIRMAN: William Varian Gary Beaumont James Boughton (excused) Da1as Disney J. Christopher Lombardo William Schreck Chuck McMahon Angela Davis (absent) ALSO PRESENT: Joe Schmitt, Administrator, CDES Bob Dunn, Acting Building Official Jeff Wright, Assistant County Attorney Paula Brethauer, Operations Analyst MISC. eorres: r~ \ A ~ Date; ''''I''ll ~ -/ 16 J A 8 December 14, 2007 I. Call Meeting to Order The meeting was called to order at I ;03 PM by Chairman Schiffer. II. Roll Call Roll Call was taken and a quorum established. The following Fire Department Personnel Representatives were present: Ed Riley, Fire Code Official; Ricco Longo, Deputv Fire Code Official; Nick Biondo. East Naples Fire Marshal; Bob Salvaggio, Fire Code Official; Bill Sylvester, Golden Gate Fire Marshal; Jackie D' la Osa. Deputv Fire Code Official; Karl Reynolds, North Naples Fire Dept.; Dave Robb, North Naples Fire Dept.; Leo Rodgers, Immokalee Fire Marshal and Michael Brown, North Naples Fire Chief III. Approval of Agenda Mr. Varian moved to approve the agenda. Second by Mr. Disney. Carried unanimously 5-0. IV. Approval of Minutes A. November 30, 2007 Mr. Schreck moved to approve the minutes subject to the following changes: Page 3, paragraph 2, line 10, Tom Hammond to "Bill Hammond." Page 5, paragraph 6, line I, Joyce Rautio to "Joyceanna J. Rautio" Second by Mr. Varian. Carried unanimously 5-0. V. Old Business Comments: (topics from past meetings) A. Water Supply None Mr. Lombardo arrived at 1:06 PM B. Alarm Systems & Monitoring Mr. Beaumont noted some contractors are concerned with checklist and application requirements in changing out devices. Also, a disparity in the fees between Electrical inspections conducted by the County ($75 per floor for high rises) and Fire Alarm inspections conducted by the Fire District ($300 per floor high rises). Ed Riley noted that the Fire Alarm inspection fees were developed by a Fire District analysis as the Statute enables the Fire District to recover the associated costs in proyiding inspections. Bob Dunn is completing a study on the various inspection fees and will submit the report to the Task Force. C. Permit Process None D. Florida Administrative Code 61G15.32 2 ie€mtr f:, 200? Bob Dunn reported the transition for reviewing Fire Alarms and Sprinklers Systems Compliance with 61 G submittal requirements is going well. It was noted that the submittal process remains the same; the change is in the review responsibilities. As an example, the comparison of 61 G compliance with shop drawings will be conducted by the Building Department. It was also noted that the new proposed requirements for Fire Alarm systems make the interpretation ofrequirements for submittals of 61 G applications more uniform throughout the State of Florida. Mr. McMahan arrived at J:20 PM Ricco Longo stated the new proposal makes the requirements more clear, and the items listed in the proposal were always required. The Collier County submittal requirements were based on determinations he receiyed from the Board of Prolessional Engineers and were received verbally or with email responses on requests for handling specific situations and the intent of requirements. It was noted that the re-write is an indication that these items were always intended to be part of a submittal. Chairman Schiffer requested a copy of the Declaratory Statement regarding this issue. A discussion ensued on the requirements for the Shop Drawing submittal. Ed Riley stated that Shop Drawings submittals will be required to proyide all necessary information sufficient to verify that the design is Code compliant and provide specifications for the installation of the system. F. Fire Sprinklers None G. Building Official and Fire Official of Governing Codes for Review None VI. New Business A. Design Professional interface with Fire Official Office None B. General & Sub Contractors interface with the Fire Official Office None C. Fire Districts Bob Salvaggio, Fire Code Official submitted a white binder handout to the Task Force in response to issues and concerns raised during the past meetings of the Task Force. Among other items, the response outlined 4 areas of concerns. 3 l~IA€ December ]4, 2007 ]. Public perception that the Fire Districts reyiew of applications are "holding up" the issuance of permits and the permit process. He provided time frames of applications noting the Consultant controlled the application substantially more than the Fire District. Among specific examples were the Philadelphia Baptist Church where it took the Fire District 10 working days to review the application and took the Architect 82 working days to re-submit the correction; the County Parking Garage where the Architect held the Application 85% of the time while the Fire District controlled it 15% of the time from original submittal to permit issuance. 2. Building Department Policies regarding responsibilities in application review and inspections of projects submitted by Private Providers. He specifically noted times when the Fire District's Review of a Specialty Permit Application has noted items of non-compliance with the Building Code and notified the Building Department but the items have not been addressed. Joe Schmitt, Administrator of Community Services and Deve]opment stated that the County has no intentions of reviewing plans submitted by Private Providers unless directed to do so by the County Attorney. He noted that if the Building Department is notified of non-compliant code issues they should be addressed by the Department. Mr. Lombardo noted concerns on the lack of County oversight regarding plans submitted by Private Providers and the County's possible non- conformance with Section 468.604 of the Florida Statute. Jeff Wright, Assistant County Attorney is preparing a report to be submitted to the Task Force regarding the County's responsibilities listed under Section 468.604 of the Florida Statute. Bob Dunn, Interim Building Official noted that the inspection logs of Private Providers are reviewed on site by the Building Department to ensure compliance with the Statute. Nick Biondo, East Naples Fire Marshal noted that a partnership with the County Building Department is important and noted the same scenario (Fire District Inspector finding a Building Code yiolation) could happen with inspections and this area should be addressed as well. 3. Potential problems in non-compliant Code Construction and Code Enforcement with the issuance of "Phased Permits" or "Early Start Letters" where construction is on-going simultaneous to Code reviews. He cited the County Parking Garage as specific example where an Early Start letter request was rejected on 5/9/05 citing a deficiency of "several critical areas", however the Early Start Letter was issued on 4 161 fl r'~ 8 December 14, 2007 5/24/05 before any action on corrections were taken by the Building Department. It was determined by the Task Force that this occurrence should be investigated as well as the Policy of Early Start Procedures. He further noted the Threshold Inspection of 3/16/06 cited the building as 90% complete, 2 days after the Building Permit was issued on 3/14/06. Mr. Lombardo lefi the meeting at 2:27PM The revisions process and continuations of construction were discussed. As an example were the Collier County Courthouse and the addition for the Admin/Control Area of the Collier County South Wastewater Reclamation Facility issues which wcre included in the binder. Break 2:35PM Re-convene 2:45PM 4. The issue of "retaliation". Included in the report is a Memorandum to File on his telephone conyersation with Lynn Eyans, dated October 23, 2007 regarding the Collier County Fueling Station (425 Sgt. Jones Road) application review which contained items of contention within the Code. Bob Salyaggio was notified that if the issues could not be resolved in a reasonable manner and since the Fire District were not County Employees, they would not be permitted to use the Evans Oil Fueling Facility as they now do. 5. A discussion ensued on Phased permits. Another example of a phased permit was Application #2006072856 with a Phase Permit issued on 6/15/06, when the Building Permit application itsclf was not submitted until 7/27/06. Dave Robb of North Naples Fire Department noted these are concerns as he had to "red tag" "Phase" permitted buildings during construction, as the Fire Review had not been completed. Subsequent to this the Building Department has removed the "red tag" without his approval. Bob Salvaggio noted that the Building Block entitled "Procedure for Phased Permit per 2004 FBC, Section 105.13" has aided as guidance for "Phase" permits. A discussion occurred on the determination and verification of fees paid for the various applications or inspections; especially impact fees not properly applied to Phase permits. Bob Dunn noted he recently met with "Impact Fee" on this issue to ensure fees are determined and paid properly. Ed Riley, Deputy Fire Code Official stated he and Mr. Dunn are not in favor of "Phased" permits or "Early Start Letters." 5 16fA Q ~ '~ December 14,2007 A discussion ensued regarding the issue of the County processing applications by Contractors or Consultants without proper licenses (i.e. Specialty Licensed Contractor applications submitted by General Contractors). Also application square footage calculations may be inaccurate. This causes delays for the Fire District's review. Bob Dunn stated he is currently addressing these situations with a new training program for the permit technicians. Chairman Schiffer noted that the Task Force intends to recommend standardized square footage calculation requirements for application submittals. A discussion ensued regarding enforcement of "Phase" permits when the work exceeds the area of approval. It was noted that some of the "Phase" permits do not have parameters on the work permitted. Further, if this occurs, enforcement action needs to be taken by the appropriate Department responsible for issuance of the required permit. Nick Biondo asked for a clarification on the procedure when a Fire Inspector notices a possible Building Code violation or if Contractor has exceeded work permitted in a "Phased" Permit. He has reported violations to the County in the past and not received a proper response. Joe Schmitt noted the Fire District and the County should work together on enforcement issues and agreed to meet with Mr. Biondo to review the policy for reporting alleged yiolations. Chairman Schiffer stated the clarity of "Phased" permits and the drawings associated with them needs to be addressed. Bob Salvaggio's presentation was continued to the next meeting. VII. Public Comments None VIII. Review offuture meeting/topics A. Friday, January IS, 200S1PM - 5PM . P ermi t process . Collier Local Amendments to the Florida Fire Prevention Code B. Friday, February 1, 200S IPM - 5PM . Roundtable Discussions C. Friday, February S, 200S 1 PM - 5PM . Roundtable Discussions . Establish Report Method 6 D. Friday, February 15,2008 I PM - 5PM . Roundtable Discussions . Reyiew Report Draft E. Friday, February 22, 2008 IPM - 5PM . Roundtable Discussions . Review Report Draft F. Friday February 29, 2008 IPM - 5PM . Review Final Report Draft G. Tuesday, March 18,2008 9AM - Noon . BCC/Fire Review Task Force Workshop lr< 1 A Q , I1etember 14. 200~ There being no further business for the goo ofthe County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair at 4:51 P. . Collier ounty Fire Review Task Force Bradley chiffer, Chairman These minutes appryved by the Board/Committee on as presented V or as amended . 7 ,cJ-J / () i Fiala -\IU"4-~- / ,," "'" Halas ~n~-' ---. Hennlng_~. . ~ Coyle.- Coletta -------- 16 i A' January 18, 2008 8 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY FIRE REVIEW TASK FORCE ~r:: Naples, Florida, January 18, 2008 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Fire Review Task Force, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, Met on this date at 1:00 P,M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier County Community Development Environmental Services Conference Room #609/610,2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, With the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Bradley Schiffer VICE CHAIRMAN; William Varian Gary Beaumont James Boughton Dalas Disney J. Christopher Lombardo(absent) William Schreck Chuck McMahon(absent) Angela Davis(absent) ALSO PRESENT: Bob Dunn, Interim Building Official Jeff Wright, Assistant County Attorney Paula Brethauer, Operations Analyst Joe Schmitt, Adminstrator, CDES MIsc. Corres: ! Le I It ~ Date: JtBrr f' 'v .- j~ 16/ tj January 18,2008 t'""( 'J I' ,i I. Call Meeting to Order The meeting was called to order at 1 ;00 PM by Chairman Schiffer. II. Roll Call Roll Call was taken and a quorum was established. The following Fire District Personnel Representatives were present; Ed Riley, Fire Code Official; Bob Salvaggio, Fire Code Official; Nick Biondo. East Naples Fire Marshal; Bill Svlvester, Golden Gate Fire Marshal; Dave RoM. North Naples Fire Dept.; Leo Rodgers, Immokalee Fire Marshal. III. Approval of Agenda Mr. Varian moved to approve the agenda. Second by Mr. Schreck. Carried unanimously 6-0. IV. Approval of Minutes A. December 14,2007 Mr. Varian moved to approve the minutes subject to the following addition: Page 2 Item D, Florida Administrative Code 6IGIS.32 Mr. Disney requested clarification related to 61 G 15 fire alarm and sprinkler reviews. After completion of reviews conducted hy the Building Department will theJire plan reviewers be required to pull the 61G-15 submissionfor comparison during the suhmittal/shop drawing reviewfor specialty permit? In response, Mr. Ed Riley stated thefire plan review will befor the submittal/shop drawings on~vfor compliance with the Florida Fire Prevention Code inforce and the 61G15 review will be a Building Departmentfunction. Second by Mr. Disney. Carried unanimously 6-0. V. Old Business A. Water Supply None B. Alarm Systems & Monitoring None C. Permit/Inspection Process None D. Florida Administrative Code None E. Fire Sprinkler None F. Building Official and Fire Official areas of Governing Code review None G. Design Professionals interface with the I<'ire Official Office None H. General & Sub Contractors interface with the Fire Official Office None 2 16./ A i 8 January 18,2008 I. Fire Districts Bob Dunn, Interim Building Official noted that the County and the Fire District had a joint meeting to discuss the issue of Fire Districts reporting building code violations to the County Building Department and the enforcement thereof. The discussions are ongoing. A discussion occurred on whether or not code upgrades are required when there are changes to existing structures that may affect the system or life safety codes. It was noted that generally, only the area ofrenoyation is required to upgrade to existing codes, ifit is determined that life safety issues are affected, then these areas affected must be upgraded to the existing code. VI. New Business A. Fire Districts, finish presentation Bob Salvaggio, Fire Code Official, continued his presentation to the Task Force. He wanted to recap some of the documentation and issues discussed in the previous meeting. Private Provider Bob Salvaggio noted the Private Provider situation has improved but requested clarifications from the County Attorney on the Private Provider Policy regarding Code violations cited during plan reviews reported by the Fire District to the County Building Department. These are issues that the District cannot respond to and is the responsibility of the County Building Department. Jeff Wright, Assistant County Attorney reported back to the Task Force regarding the issue and noted that Private Providers are responsible for Plan Review and Inspections Review. For the County to also provide this function would be a double review and increase costs to the County. He noted that if applications show a pattern of poor perfonnance by the Private Provider then the Building Department could step in for safety concerns. There is a quality control check in the Statute that allows the Building Officials to duplicate the review and inspections if they choose to do so. Ed Riley, Fire Code Official noted a Fire District concern being; If an applicant chooses to use a Private Proyider service, the Building Department is not without responsibility to ensure code compliance. If a permit is issued and in the future it is determined the permit was not code compliant, the County may be held liable. This is a safety issue first, and also a legal issue. Jeff Wright noted that it is appropriate for the Fire District to notify the Building Department and the Building Department should address the issue. 3 .. A, ~f3 16/ January 18, 2008 Bob Dunn, Interim Building Official noted that he is on top of the Priyate Proyider issue. He has inspectors on site and will not process a Certificate of Occupancy if all inspections are not completed. If a code violation is noted by the Fire District, he has a policy in place to address it to ensure that code compliant pcnnits are issued. The Task Force noted that the Priyate Provider issue needs to be addressed. Jeff Wright noted that outside of the scope of the Committee, an amendment to the local code may bc the solution. Parkin!! Gara!!e Bob Salvaggio requested the status of the investigation of the issuance of the County Parking Garage permit. Bob Dunn stated that he will obtain the record and submit the report to the Task Force. Courthouse Annex Bob Salvaggio noted the projects plans are "back on track." Immokalee Senior Housin!! Bob Salvaggio stated this project was reviewed through the "simultaneous plan review" avenue for permit issuance. There was an inconsistency in the classification of the Building Construction typc. An early start letter was issued. There was no approval of a site development plan yet the construction continued beyond the scope of an early start letter. This project's construction was allowed to continue in lieu of the Fire Districts requests to halt construction. The permit process in place was not adhered to by the Building Department. A time frame of the application submittals will be provided to the Task Force. Basik Flea Market Bob Salvaggio noted that correction 14 has been submitted. He requested clarification on whether or not the project has been "red tagged." He understood it is "red tagged", but noted people have been working on the building. In his review, the County computer system notes no "red tag" or inspection hold." Bob Dunn stated he had requests to release the inspection hold, etc. and held a meeting with representatiyes of the project. They were notified the building must be brought into compliance. He stated the project is "red tagged". Mr. Riley noted the issue of how a "red tag" is placed on a building, how it is posted in the computer, etc. and that it needs to be addressed and the Building Department needs a consistent policy which the Fire District can rely on. 4 "P'1 16 :} A 8 January 18,2008 Remodelinl! & Addition - Wastewater treatment plant - 5600 Warren Street Bob Salvaggio noted that based on a 3/15/06 letter from Roy Anderson, PE Director of Collier County Public Utilities and Engineering confirming work the County agreed to complete by 111107, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy was issued. On 12/] 8/2006 a letter was sent to Bill Hammond of the Building Department from Mr. Anderson requesting that no second floor access be required due to a re-designation of space. The Fire District rejected this re-designation of space request and to date the original agreed upon work has not been completed and the renovated space has been in operation for 2 years without a final Certifieate of Occupancy. 2800 Horseshoe Drive replacement of 6-ton OSA units on rooftop Bob Salvaggio noted no resolution is in sight with the Building Department. Two existing units have smoke control. The new one branching off is under scrutiny. It was noted that this issue was initiated before Bob Dunn was in his current position. He noted some of the new doors are installed in violation of code in the Building Department area. Collier Countv Jail Bob Salvaggio noted that the County Jail requested permission to start up new boilers, they were installed without a permit and he instructed them to contact Nick Biondo. Nick Biondo, East Naples Fire Marshal stated he spoke with the person and notified them the boilers could not be started up as they had no permit. To date he has not heard back and is under the assumption the boilers are operating. Sway Lounl!e Bob Salvaggio stated that permission was given to start this project 4 days after receiYing the permit application. No review was conducted whatsoever before issuance of the early start letter. There was a "red tag" issued on 5/1 0/06 but this "red tag" was overturned against the Fire Districts recommendation and the contractor was permitted to continue without the required inspections. A discussion occurred on who has authority to issue and remove "red tags", in this case it was a Building Department "red tag." It was noted that the Fire District has had "red tags" oyerturned by the Building Department in the past. ]n closing he noted the process is a great concern. The lack of consistent policies within the Building Department and coordination with the Fire District have created issues that become more difficult to resolve for all parties involved. 5 161 8 January 18, 2008 Break - 2:50PM Re - Convene 3: IOPM B. Collier Local Amendments to the Florida Fire Prevention Code It was noted the State Fire Preyention Code allows the ability for local amendments if needed. The County has carried local amendments in through the 200 I and 2004 cycles. Jeff Wright, Assistant County Attorney noted that the County Parking Garage application and requirements raised the issue of the County revisiting local amendments to the Fire Code and created the Task Force to review the amendments and recommend changes. A discussion ensued on whether any local amendments were necessary to the code; the status of the local amendments and proposed amendments. It was further noted that one of the main issues was fire flows/water pressures. Chairman Schiffer noted the original resolution states "Provide the Board of County Commissioners with recommendations of practical revisions to the Collier County Fire Prevention and Protection Ordinance." Ed Riley, Fire Code Official noted that the County as well as the Fire Districts are empowered to adopt local amendments to the Florida Code. It was determined at the time the amendments were developed to adopt it through the Board of County Commissioners as opposed to each independent Fire District adopting amendments. This would provide the public haYing a single location to obtain the amendments to the Ordinance. It was determined that the Task Force review the following sections of the Local Amendments in Chapter 58 of the Collier County Laws and Ordinances. NFPA 1 - Fire Prevention and Protection 10.12.2(3) Fire Protection Plan Dave Robb, North Naples Fire Dept., noted a Pre-Fire Plan's goal is to provide safer conditions during an emergency for firefighters and quicker rescues. It provides personnel a document to review before entering a building. It can be reviewed periodically without numerous site yisits. This requirement does not hold up the issuance of a permit. It is a condition of the Certificate of Occupancy. It was noted a final "as-built" should possibly be required at the time of Certificates of Occupancy and as changes occur through the building process. 10.12.2.6 All electronic l!ates are required to receive a buildinl! permit with fire review prior to installation. Ed Riley noted that an access gate requires a permit as a common access system for Police, Fire and Rescue in an emergency is a necessity. It was 6 16"} A 8 January 18,2008 noted that it could possibly be added to the requirements for Gate Pennits and not an amendment to the Fire Code. 10.16.3 Outdoor Events Ed Riley noted that the amendment in this section requires the life safety requirements be submitted 2 weeks in advance of the event to proyide the reviews in a timely maimer. It has not been a problem in the past. 13.3.2.1.1 Sprinkler System requirements for 4 or more livin!! units Ed Riley noted that there are other requirements that provide for 3 units requirements and this section is under review in the next cycle. 13.3.1.7.1.1 Sprinkler System Monitorin!! Nick Biondo noted this reduces false alanns and provides notification if a system initiates without anyone present. 13.5.3 Backflow assemblies servin!! maximum of 2 buildin!!s Ed Riley noted this requirement is to allow the shutting down of water flows to a maximum of two buildings alleyiating the problem of having to shutdown multiple buildings when the work perfonned would not require this. 13.7.1.4.11.1.1 Sprinkler Systems require Audio Visual Devices on Exteriors of Buildin!!s Dave Robb noted this is effective for firefighters at night and the cost in new construction is minimal for the benefit proyided. If it is a retrofit they will evaluate the situation on a case by case basis to detennine if it is necessary. NFPA 101- Life Safety 4.9.1 Use of Fire and Spark Producin!! Devices in Public Places Nick Biondo and Ed Riley were in favor ofremoving this section. It was placed in at the request of the County. 9.7.4.1 Portable Fire Extin!!uishers Ed Riley noted NFP A 101 does not require Fire Extinguisher in some occupancies. The amendment was to regulate the placement of extinguishers to ensure all necessary areas are coyered. Dave Robb noted the District is looking for an interdependent working relationship with the Building Department. As previously noted there has been a meeting and discussions are progressing. The Task Force requested a flow chart for an application submitted from both the Fire District and the Building Department. 7 'f I' 1 n I"'~ -"j , ,~ 8 January 18, 2008 In preparation for the next meeting, Chairman Schiffer reyiewed the resolution from the Board of County Commissioners which states "the purpose of the committee is to discuss concerns related to fire review and inspections associated with the building plan review and permitting process; review building review and permitting procedures related to fire review and provide the Board of County Commissioners with recommendationsfor practical revisions to the Collier County Fire Prevention and Protection Ordinance." VII. Public Comments Connie Tavalaro of Pinnacle Pools appeared before the Task Force requesting clarifications on what constitutes Fire District review of a pool permit. Bob Salvaggio stated that construction of a swimming pool only does not require a review and to note that on the application that it is for "pool only; deck, gate, etc. by others." A swimming pool with a gate, deck, pool house. etc. does require a review. VIII. Review of future meetings/topics A. Friday, February 1,2008 IPM - 5PM . Roundtable Discussions B. Friday, February 8, 2008 IPM - 5PM . Roundtable Discussions . Establish Report Method C. Friday, February 15,2008 IPM - 5PM · Roundtable Discussions . Review Report Draft D. Friday, February 22, 2008 IPM - 5PM . Roundtable Discussions . Revicw Report Draft E. Friday February 29, 2008 IPM - 5PM · Review Final Report Draft F. Tuesday, March 18,2008 9AM - Noon · BCC/Fire Review Task Force Workshop There being no further business for the good ofthe County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair at 4:51 P.M. 8 16"1 ~ January 18,2008 Collier C unty Fire Review Task Force (' Bradley chiffer, Chairman These minutes approv y the Board/Committee on as presented or as amended 9 \ \ \ , ~\\\O?' 8 . 'ala /.'tx.kN~___ \;'\' 'tt' '.-j"I"'ll;;; ,- )":. .-.----.-.--.' 101!.... ",-<.w.t~ Hennin~g_- . .._- ,;oyle . .. ,,_.. ,.. C::oJetta ... ... '... ._.. ~ 'T ~ , . ..'." r J,~:J bl A "'~8 February I, 2008 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY FIRE REVIEW TASK FORCE Naples, Florida, February 1,2008 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Fire Review Task Force, in and forthe County of Collier, having conducted business herein, Met on this date at I :00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier County Community Development Environmental Services Conference Room #609/610,2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, With the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Bradley Schiffer VICE CHAIRMAN: William Varian Gary Beaumont (excused) James Boughton Dalas Disney J. Christopher Lombardo (absent) William Schreck Chuck McMahon (absent) Angela Davis (absent) ALSO PRESENT: Bob Dunn, Interim Building Official Jeff Wright, Assistant County Attorney Paula Brethauer, Operations Analyst Joe Schmitt, Adminstrator, CDES Kim Grant, Sf. Op~rations & Management CMfse~11,I~nt JIm Seabasty, Zonmg Department '/1 IL Q .DaleJ VI f1 0 i'em# J 16" A R February 1, 2008 . I. Call Meeting to Order The meeting was called to order at 1 ;05 PM by Chairman Schiffer II. Roll Call Roll Call was taken and a quorum was established. The following Fire District Personnel Representatives were present; Ed Riley. Fire Code Official; Bob Salvaggio, Fire Code Official; Nick Biondo. East Naples Fire Marshal; Bill Svlvester, Golden Gate Fire Marshal; Dave Robh, North Naples Fire Dept. III. Approval of Agenda Mr. Varian moved to approve the agenda, Second by Mr, Disney, Carried unanimously 5-0, IV, Approval of Minutes A. January 18,2007 Mr. Disney moved to approve the minutes of the January IS. 200S meeting, Second by Mr, Schreck. Carried unanimously 5-0. JeJfWright left the meeting at 1: 12PM The Task Force agreed to hear item # VI first. VI. New Business A. Permit Administration Software Update (Kim Grant, Sr. Operations & Mgmt. Consultant) Kim Grant appeared before the Task Force to provide an update on the new "CityView" software being implemented by the County. This system will replace CD Plus. She noted the implementation of the software is in 3 phases, Code Enforcement and Cashiering, Planning Activities and the Building Department module with the following timetable for the process; 1. Basic Plan Current process & future processlideas analysis: March 08 System/Process Design and Confirmation with vendor: June 08 Go Live: End of 2008 2. Issues Already Raised Electronic Submissions She noted that Electronic Submissions are not currently in the scope of the CityView implementation. Real Time Permit Status She noted that the status of permit applications and the ability to review "real time" comments are in the scope of the implementation pending coordination with the vendor. 2 16// 8 February I, 2008 Website The Task Force noted Real Time Pennit Status accessibility through the web site along with outside web access with subscriptions and pin numbers for persons to access public infonnation with the infonnation cross linked to GIS data would be optimal. 3. Questions/Input Among other items, the Task Force noted the importance of the following; . continuing to pursue the feasibility of providing an Electronic Submission option if one so chooses (in addition to the paper submission option) . the ability to requests inspections online . the possibility of simultaneous reviews where the client and reviewer could view the plan on the computer with comments via a phone conference Kim Grant noted that all requests may not be able to be fulfilled, howeyer it is a system with a new fonnat, not the same system with an "upgrade." Joe Schmitt, CDES Administrator stated that Electronic Submission has been investigated and is a direction the Department wants to pursue, however at this point it is not feasible because of the current funding situation within the Department and timing of the implementation of CityView. He noted he would welcome a favorable recommendation by the Task Force regarding this issue. V. Old Business: (topics from past meetings) A. Water Supply None B. Alarm Systems and Monitoring None C. Permit/Inspection Process Paula Brethauer, Operations Analyst submitted a color coded document representing the current Building Department application review flow chart for reyiew by the Task Force. D. Florida Administrative Code None E. Fire Sprinkler None F. Building Official and Fire Official areas of Governing Code review None G. Design Professionals interface with the Fire Official Office None H. General & Sub Contractors interface with the Fire Official Office None I. Fire Districts 3 :./f"'f! 161 A 8 February 1,2008 Bob Salvaggio, Fire Code Official, submitted the following documents for review by the Task Force; . "Phase II" of documentation provided by the Fire District regarding additional issue identified by the Fire District . A document entitled "Fire Plan Review Flow Sheet" . A document entitled "Immokalee Senior Housing Timeline" Dave Robb, of North Naples Fire Department conducted a review of a Collier County Wastewater Treatment Plant in North Naples and determined that a permit issued in 2003 has not received the proper inspections or a Certificate of Occupancy. Bob Salvaggio is compiling a report on the status of inspections for the project and will report back to the Task Force. Bob Dunn, Interim Building Official, noted that his Department is reviewing previously issued pennits to insure inspections were completed and Certificate's of Occupancy have been issued where applicable. Break: 2:25PM Re-Convene: 2:45PM B. Roundtable Discussions Topics from past meetings were reviewed for possible report recommendations. Chairman Schiffer moved to recommend that various categories of standardized calculated square footage areas be included on plans submitted for approvals. Said categories to be determined atfuture meetings. Second by Mr. Disney. Carried unanimously 5-0. A. Water Supply Mr. Disney moved to recommend that the Collier County Water-Sewer District Utility Standards Manual be revised to require a low limit of 50 psi residual for fire flows. Further, Nick. Biondo, Ed Riley and Mr. Disney determine the exact wording of said proposed revision. Second by Mr. Schreck. Carried unanimously 5-0. Mr. Disney moved to recommend requiring all Water Utilities servicing unincorporated Collier County be required to meet the same standard of a low limit of 50 psi for fire flows. Second by Mr. Varian. Carried unanimously 5-0. B. Alarm Systems and Monitoring Discussion occurred on the following topics with no recommendations brought forth. 4 VII. VIII. 16/ !] 8 February 1,2008 1. Ways to alleviate requirements for permits for maintenance, repair or renovations of existing systems. Ed Riley, Fire Code Official noted that permits are not required when like or similar devices are changed out for maintenance purposes if the replacement deyices are deemed compatible with the existing system. He further stated that various Committees such as the Fire Alarm Committee, the Fire Sprinkler Committee and the Hood Suppression Committee are in place and continue to pursue feasible means of addressing these types of Issues. 2. The necessity of the submittal checklist for Fire Alarms applications. Ed Riley noted that the checklist was developed primarily at the request of the Fire Alann Contractors with their input. It is designed to assist the applicant in submitting a Code Compliant Design. It was noted that the Report should recognize that the Fire District is no longer reviewing Chapter 6IG /5 (or the Florida Administrative Code) submittals for the Building Department. The Fire Plan Review conducted by the Fire District will befor the submittal of shop drawings onlv andfor their compliance with the F/orida Fire Prevention Code in/orce. Chapter 6/GI5 review will be a Building Departmentfill1ction. Ed Riley noted that the issues raised by the Fire District regarding the County Building Department Permit Process occurred before Bob Dunn, Interim Building Official was in his current position and he has a good working relationship with Mr. Dunn. The issues raised were not a renection of how Mr. Dunn is administering the Department. Bob Dunn agreed that the working relationship between the Building Department and the Fire District is much improved. Topics review was continued to the next meeting. Public Comments None Review of future meetings/topics A. Friday, February 8, 2008 IPM - 5PM . Roundtable Discussions . Establish Report Method B. Friday, February 15,2008 1 PM - 5PM . Roundtable Discussions . Review Report Draft 5 C. Friday, February 22, 2008 IPM - 5PM . Roundtable Discussions . Review Report Draft D. Friday February 29, 2008 IPM - 5PM . Review Final Report Draft E. Tuesday, March 18,2008 9AM - Noon . BCC/Fire Review Task Force Workshop 16/ n 8 There being no further business for the good ofthe County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair at 4:51 P.M. February 1,2008 Collier C unty Fire Review Task Force Bradley chiffer, Chairman These minutes approved by the BoardlCommitt as presented or as amended on ~/ g ~ !! , I 6 161i-r-~ Rt:C !\lED ~. . , i '. '''8 " ~'_ . I' -:" " 'i lOti FOREST LAKES RO\IlW\ \\NIlIHL\I"Ii \(;/-: \J.S:P,..(dc>"""'" ; "'''''",o.0ne; Fiala ~'f_ Halas -L. ~ ~.. Hennlng~ - Coyle. .--' Coletta ----- I. Call to Order ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FL 34104 December 12, 2007 Aaenda II. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes - November 14, 2007 V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget - Caroline Soto B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard, Chris Tillman! Malcome Pirine VI. Old Business A. Bond Issue Project - Sharon Newman! Transportation Operations Manager, Mark Isackson! Budget Analyst VII. New Business VIII. Public Comments IX. Adjournment The next meeting will be on January 9, 2007 10:00 a.m. Collier County Transportation Building, East Conference Room 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 MISC. CQffes: Date l ~. c ".{\ \ ltem#: 1 -',-.....-.s to j NOV-I2-200r 10:44AM 16/ A POOI/002 ~8 FROt.+- BGNNlf:SS !NC. Pa\liJ\\1 :Ilut SllLW<XU Coamactors 1990 Seward Avenue Naples. Florida 34109 (239) S97-6221 . (239) 597-7416 Fa~ \V\VW.bonnessinc.com proposal 11/12/2007 Submitted TO: Collier County Alternative Transportatio" Modes Estimate Number: 14812007 H52 Address: 2885 Horseshoe Dr. South Bid Title: Forest Lakes MSTU-Pavement Markings 8< Reflectors Naples, FL 34104 Project Location: Forest Lakes Contact: Darryl Richard Project City, State: Naples, FL Phone: (239) 659-5775 Fa};: (239) 530-6219 Engineer I Architect: lItem # Item DeSCription Fnrest t akp.~ Blvd (ThP.rtnODlad'ic On ASDhalt Overlav Only) 01 6" Solid Yellow Thermoplastic (Centerline-9,OOO L.F.). 02 6" Solid White Ihermoplastic (Edgeline-19,700 L.F.) D3 Amber R.PM.s (4D' Spacing). 04 Thermoplastic Markings Total Total Price for above Forest Lakes Blvd. (The......oplastic On Asphalt Overlay Only) Items: Fnrest l3lkp.s Blvd {Painted Markinas} D5 6" Solid Yellow Paint (Centerline-4,250 L.F,) D6 6" Solid White Paint (Edgeline-8,SOO L.F ,) 07 Amber R.P.M.s Installed (11D Each). 08 Painted Markings Iota I Total Price for above Forest Lakes Blvd. (Painted Markings) Items: Fo~t t .rtIkes nr'iv@ (P:.int.f't Markin9s) 09 6" Solid Yellow Paint (Centerline-4,425 L.F.) to 6" Solid White Paint (Edgeline-8,850 L.F.) 11 Amber R.P.M.S Installed (115 Each). 12 Painted Markings Total Total Price for above Forest Lakes Drive (Painted Markings) Items: Side ~@@b;-s;r.oO RAn; 81 C"..enterlinbe Onlv-SI!F- NOTES 13 24" Solid White Paint (Stopbars-Re-stripe / 22 Each). 14 6" Solid Yellow Paint (Centerline'l,4Sa L.F.). 15 Painted Markings Total Total Price for abovco Side Streets-Stop 1I.iIr"$ & centerlinbe Only-SEE NOTES Items: SidA ~ R.p M s At Turns 11/12/20079:37:06 AM $27,544.65 $6,024.70 $6,247.70 $1,786.42 page 1 of 2 .,;;,; 16/ 4 lEONNIESS me. ~-'8.qat\.-e and Sl(~ COrdr.1l';:roOi 1990 Seward Avenue Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597.022\ . (239) 597.7416 fax www.bonnessinc.com 9 HIS P 002/002 H52 NOV-IZ-2007 10:45A~ FROM- Item Description White R.P.M.S Installed (12.0 Each). R.P.M.S Total lItem # 15 17 Total Price for above Side Streets R.P.M.5 At Turns Items: $1,060.46 Totalllid Price: $42,663.93 Notes: . Subject to prompt acceptance within 15 days and to all conditions stipulated on the reverse side, we agree to furnish materials and labor at the price(s) set forth above, if 15 days have expired propOS<l1 price may still be honored call to verifY. . Painting and Stendling of car>tops not included. . permits and/or fees (if neccesary) by others. . Above proposal for Items quoted only. 'ThiS estimate is for one toot of paint or thermoplastic only where indicated above and R,p.M.s. There is no off-site, signage, or emovals of any kind induded in this estimate. . ....NOTE: SIDE STREETS: Stop bar and centerline only on Azalea Lane, Boxwood Lane, Camelia, Daisy, Eucalyptus, Fig Lane, Gerdenia Lane, HappOlo Lane, Ivygatte Lane, Jimpson Lane, Kelp Lane, Lyonia Lane, Milkwort Lane, r"larita Lane, Opuntia Lane, Pyxiemoss Lane, Salvia Lane, Tuppence Lane, Vinca Lane, Wisteria Lane. Payment Terms: Payment due within 30 days of date of Invoice, regardleSS of when payment IS made by Owner ACCEPTED: The above prices, specifications and tonditiuns are satisfactory and hereby accepted. Buyer Signature: Date of Acceptance: CONFIRMED: Bonness Inc. Authorized Signature: Estimator: poage 2 of 2 11/12/2007 9:,N. AM j.'!' 11 /14/2007 ."'.', 16/A 9 Wednesday, October 24,2007 Prepared by: Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Tessie Sillery, Operations Coordinator, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes FOREST LAKES MSTU Proiect Status (F-36) - ACTIVE ( POC: Tessie Sillery) - Stripping & reflectors within all roads in boundary map 10-10-07: Committee requested for all the roads within the MSTU be stripped and reflector be placed. 10-26-07: Requested quote from Bonness. 11-9-07: Received Quote from Bonness - under review with Chris Tillman - Malcom's office (F-34) - ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richard, Chris Tilman (Malcolm Pirine) Swale Project Scope Definitions; 6-13-07: Meeting with Malcolm Pirine to review base map of swales and lakes as per Bond Issue Project List. Map requires some minor modification. Scope of Swale projects will be derived from Base Map. SCHEDULE: (F-31) - ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richard) -Easement for Swales & Lakes 3-29-07: RLS sent to Scott Teach for recommendation regarding request as per Macolm Pirine advisement that easement may be the option the MSTU would want to pursue for swales and lakes. Also included in request is evaluation of roadways in terms of easements. 4-30-07: RLS received from Scott Teach regarding obtaining easement within Golf Course Property. Recommendation is to proceed with obtaining easement within Golf Course for both swales and lakes. Easement is not required for roadways as per RLS. 5-9-07: Meeting with Kevin Hendricks regarding easements. Kevin will work directly with Chris Tilman (Consultant) and Liaison Project Manager Darryl Richard in obtaining any required easementlRight of Entry. Recommendation from Kevin was to pursue negotiation with Golf Course based on a 'preliminary' map (to be produced by Malcolm Pirine) of the easement areas. 7-6-07: Meeting with Golf Course - review of easements - Chris - Malcom Pernie will be sending out a report of the results of meeting. 7-23-07: July 16"', draft document received from Malcom Pernie & County staff reviewing with Consultant - Presentation per Quail Run Golf Course 8-15-07: (week of) Malcolm Pirine coordinating project details with Quail Run Club Mgmt. 8-22-07: RWA will be performing Survey - quote from RWA pending regarding the Golf Course approval. 9-10-07: Obtaining scope of service from RW A - (RWA to create scope) 1 11/14/2007 16/A 9 9-12-07: RWA has provided draft scope - under review by Malcolm Pirine 10-17-07: Purchasing requested changes in Scope lump sum vs time & material and other verbage. 10-22-07: R W A has provided proposal - county staff to review and requested revisions. 11-6-07: RW A has revised proposal several times per request of county staff. Still pending on revision 11-8-07: RWA responded and Work Order is with Budget Analyst going through signature process. (F26) - ON GOING-ACTIVE (POC: Tessie SiIlcry)- Signage Maintainance 11-08-06: Fogg moved to utilize annual contractor- maximum $10,000.00 1-29-07: Requested estimate. 2-14-07: PO for annual maintenance in amount of $10,000.00 requested. 3-13-07: PO emailed to Lykins for ongoing maintenance 9-30-07: PO closed for end of fiscal year. 10-10 -07: Requested estimate. 10-20-07: Estimate came in at $5,000.00 11-06-07: Request for PO in process 10-10-07: Received PO for $5,000 and NTP went out. (F-25) - ON GOING-ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richard) - Pot Hole Repairs 11-08-06: Fogg moved to increase funds for pot hole repair up to $40,000.00 12-13-06: Work Order in Progress 1-10-07: Bonness NTP - $40,000 1-23-07: Bonness - will be marking pot holes. 2-05-07: Bonness marked and in process of repairing pot holes 2-12-07: Bonness repaired pot-holes. Marked areas filled with asphalt. Villas turn area remains for future project. 4-13-07: Villas area has been completed, some minor pot-holes are forming in other areas. Bonness called to perform inspection/repair under current PO. 10-24-07: New Fiscal Year 07-08 - Bonness - $ 11,491.61 11-6-07: Work Order in process. - pending signatures (F-23) ON GOING-ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richard)-Desiltation of Culverts; includes telescope inspection within Forest Lakes; MSTU Committee vote to obtain annual services from Shenandoah Construction based on annual contract not to exceed $30,000.00 per year. Project Manager to confirm scope of work with contractor prior to each service. 10-11-06: Committee approves $30,000 for annual contract with Shenandoah. 11-7-06: Increase to PO ($3,155.70) 1-25-07: Requested for Estimate for annual maintenance not to exceed $26,800.00 3-13-07: NTP-sentto Shanendoah 3-15-07: Shenandoah contacted to de-silt Woodshire Ditch. 4-12-07: Meeting with Mike of Shenandoah for direction in specific project areas within Forest Lakes for desilting. Areas include: Villas near Lake 6; Pipes near Lake 8 including 4 inch outfall and 24 inch; Pipes near Lake 13 and Lake 10. Completion by 5/12/07. 4-27-07: Shenandoah completed items near Lake #6 and Villas from 4-12-07 meeting. 5-8-07: All Hems noted on 4-12-07 are completed. Ongoing maintenance as per future request. 5-8-07: Committee requested Darryl to work with company - not following what they requested 5-23-07: Darryl met with company regarding dumping in area. - issue resolved 10-24-07: Purchasing going to BCC for approval of new contractors for annuals. 11-6-07: Pending new bid tab and bee approval. 11-14-07: Spoke with purchasing and this item will not be bid out as of yet - still working on bid process. Purchasing advised to get three quotes for now. 2 11/14/2007 I'6 1 ff;9' (F -16) -ON GO I N G- A CTI VE (POC: Tess ie S i lIery )-Exotic Removal- W oodshire Ditch -Lake Doctors Annual Maintenance Contract - Woodshire Ditch & pump station - Notice to proceed ITEM 5,2005 - $4,770.00 - Annually 5-15-05 - Purchasing required Re-Bid (quote) for project - Quotes due 5-26-06 5-30-06 - Annual Contractor Aquagenix (George Bowling) to provide quote based on annual contract- pending 6-12-06 - PO requested waiting on Gloria 6-27-06 - PO issued and ongoing 4-4-07: New Quote received from Lake Doctors for $4,740.00 4-13-07: Quote received from Aquagenics (George Bowling) at $6,180.00; No Quote received from Aquatic Systems. Lake Doctors is the apparent low at $4,740.00 5-7-07: NTP - Lake Doctors - $4,740.00 9-30-07: PO Closed end of Fiscal Year 10-12-07: New Fiscal Year 07-08 - NTP $ 5, 640.00 (F-15) ONGOING-ACTIVE (POC: Tessie Sillery)- Mowing - Woodshire Drive - Landscape Maintenance Contract - 400 ft. x 20 ft. Sod Mowing. Quotes requested from annual contractors. 4-17-06; Southern Services under contract for maintenance on annual basis based on contract rates. 3-16-07: Southern Services Contacted to mow up to Forest Lakes Blvd. 5-10-07: Southern Services PO increased by $ 3, 340.00 till end of FY. 9-30-07: End of Fiscal year - po's closed 10-12-07: New Fiscal Vear 07-08 -NTP issued (F-29) - COMPLETED (POC: Darryl Richard) -Bond Issue Finance Package 12-11-06: Meeting with Mike Smykowski, Office of Business Management & Budget, Director. 12-13-06: Requested project information sent to Mike Smykowski for submittal to PFM (Financial Consultant). 12-13-06: Package sent to PFM for review. 1-10-7: Mike Smykowski reports that there will be a Budget Meeting on 1-11-07. During Budget meeting there will be a review of the Forest Lakes Bond Issue. PFM or another option (Loan with a Bank) will be recommended to fmance bond issue. Alternative funding through a Bank will be reviewed. 1-17-07: Meeting with Chairman & staff to discuss priority project list and finance items 2-14-07: Bond Issue funds are anticipated to be available after April 1,2007. Committee request to see break-down of Cost for bond issue for next meeting. 3-14-07: PFM will be attending the meeting 3-23-07: PFM sends "Schedule" for bond issue. Staff confirms project list and schedule. Funds are due to be released in June 2007. 5-9-07: Revised release of funds date is July 2007 as per PFM correspondence. 7-9-07: Kelly - PFM emailed a schedule regarding bond. 7-18-07: Kelly - PFM emailed a new schedule - draft debt service schedules showing coverage on the allocated millage and a revised Plan of Finance detailing the tax reform issue. 9-10-07: Budget Dept. - Novus Exec. Summary - regarding bonding for forest lakes: Below see exec. Summary title: 9-11-07 bcc meeting This item to be heard on or about 11 :00 a.m. A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting as the Governing Body of Collier County, Florida and the Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage Municipal Service Taxing Unit, authorizing the issuance of not exceeding $6,250,000 in aggregate principal amount of Collier County, Florida Limited General Obligation Bonds (Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage Municipal Service Taxing Unit), Series 2007, to finance the costs of certain roadway lighting, roadway-related drainage and roadway restoration within the Forest Lakes MSTU and to pay certain costs and expenses Incurred with the issuance of the Series 2007 Bonds; Providing for the payment of said Bonds from ad valorem taxation levied in an amount which shall not exceed four mills on all taxable property within the boundaries of the MSTU; Making certain covenants and agreements in connection therewith; Providing for the rights of the holders of such bonds; authorizing the awarding of said Series 2007 Bonds pursuant to a public bid; Delegating certain authority to the Chair for the award of the Series 2007 Bonds and the approval of the terms and details of said Series 2007 Bonds; Authorizing the publication of a notice of sale for the Series 2007 Bonds or a summary thereof; Appointing the paying agent and registrar for said Series 2007 Bonds; Authorizing the distribution of a preliminary official statement and the execution and delivery of an official 3 "f1 t','.." .It fk A 9 11114/2007 statement with respect to the Series 2007 Bonds; Authorizing the execution and delivery of a continuing disclosure certificate with respect to the Series 2007 Bonds; Authorizing municipal bond insurance for the Series 2007 Bonds; and providing an effective date. (Mike Smykowski, Director, Office of Management and Budget) 10-1-07: Funds were transferred into the MSTU Fund. -10-07: FYI: Rec'deanemailfrom Russell Edghill Consultant, Public Financial Management, Inc. 300 South Orange Ave. Suite 1170, Orlando, FL 32801 (P) 407.648.2208 and IF) 407.648.1323 edghillr@pfm.comCoIlierCounty(FL)Lirnited GO Bonds (Forest LakesRoadway and Drainage MSTU), Series 2007 - Closed transaction on this date: (F-30) - COMPLETED - (POC: Tessie Sillery) - 0 & E Report for Woodshire Lane Project is to determine responsibility for Tree Trimming - Woodshire Lane (Includes: ROW Survey and 0 & E Report on ownership at corners intersection of Woodshire Lane @ Pine Ridge Road) 03-09-07: Met in field with George Fogg - reviewed project - questions were raised in regards to which trees need trimming. 03-09-07: After meeting in field -landscaping was notified of committess concerns - to trim hedge & remove palm tree for obstruction of oncoming cars. 03-13-07: Project to be discussed at meeting - Who owns the corner of Woodshire & Pine Ridge? 03-22-07: Staff requires survey indicating location of trees prior to issue of Work OrderIPurchase Order to trim trees. Determination of ROW needs to be made through survey. 04-11-07: MSTU Committee approves not to exceed $6,000.00 for ownership and encumberance report and survey for the Woodshire Lane from Forest Lakes Blvd. to Pine Ridge Road. 5-11-7 : Confirmation for ownership and encumberance report cost from Executive Title in the amount of $90.00; Request for Purchase Order submitted. PO issue is pending. Quotes for survey from annual consultant is for $2,500.00 from ABB Engineering. - Thes two companies are not annuals - denied quotes 5-23-07: PO Request in process - waiting on a PO - $750.00 5-30-07: NTP - 30 days 6-30-07: Received All three 0 & E's on all three locations requested (F-35) - COMPLETED - (POC: Darryl Richard) - Survey for Woodshire lane up to Forest lakes blvd. 5-15-07: Requested for quote from RW A 5-23-07: Processing WO with Contractor 6-20-07: NTP - with completion date of August 17, 2007 7-23-07: Benchmark delays - Darryl provided RW A with platt map to better define benchmarks. 8-17-07: survey completed. (F-32) -COMPLETE: (POC: Darryl Richard) Overlay Project #1 - Bond Issue Project List SCHEDULE: Forest Lakes MSTU: Overlay Project No. One 3-13-07: Scope of overlay project rec'd from malcome pernie 4-10-07: Quotes for Overlay Project #1 have been reviewed. Contractors have been requested to confirm unit cost for quote. 4-16-07: Final Quotes for Overlay Project #1 have been received. Bonness is the apparent low quote at $189,495.79; other quotes: Quality at $197,552.50, Better Roads at $196,829.00; Committee has already approved not to exceed $310,000 for project at March 14, 2007 meeting. 4-27-07: Approval of Work Order pending. Work Order Issue will be for 30 day time-line. 5-23-07: NTP - 5-14-07 - Bonness 6-13-07: Contractor to start project on 6-18-07 with 2 week construction 6-27-07: Completed 4 11/14/2007 16/A 9 (F-20) COMPLETE (POC: Darryl Richard) - Gravity Flow System: Proposal for Design Phase 9-12-06: Need Scope of Services from Consultant. 9-13-06: MSTU Committee approves 'Not to exceed' for $90,000.00 for the project 9-25-06: Scope of Services received from WilsonMiller exceeds the $90,000.00 limit. Wilson Miller to revise scope. 10-11-06: Committee approves not to exceed $120,000 for WilsonMiller Scope of Services. 12-6-06: Committee notified that Notice to Proceed will not be sent to WilsonMiller until review of proposal by Staff and Malcom Pirine has been completed. 1-17-07 : pending Malcom Pirine to review 2-6-07: Upon Consultant review and staff review NTP sent to WilsonMiller for project. 3-13-07: Wilson Miller locating existing utilities for project 4-5-07: Stop Work Issued for Gravity Flow System Project. Project is under review by Malcolm Pirine, Collier County Stormwater Department (Oversight- In House), and Department of Alternative Trans. Modes. 7-1-07: Project cancelled as per committee request. (F-27) - COMPLETE (POC: Tessie Sillel)') - Engineer study -turn on Woodshire 12-05-06: Documentation sent to Traffic Operations for review of proposed installation. Meeting with Bob Tipton, Director, Traffic Operations. 1-10-07: Bob Tipton confirms that installation is not approved. 1-17-07: As per discussion with Bob Tipton, Traffic Operations will review in terms of , SOP' for Publix shopping center and report back to A TM Staff. 1-13-07: Discussion with Bob Tipton regarding determination of approval for "No Left Turn" sign. 2-22.07: No Left Turn Sign Installed by Traffic Operationsthrough Bob Tipton 3-8-07: Traffic Ops Director- reviewing PUD- The sign installed by traffic opsis only temporary till further review is done (F~28) - COMPLI:TF (POC' l)arryl Richard) - Malcom Pirine Project Management Oversight Services- Committee approve $40,000.00 for annual services. 12-06-06: Committee approved the funding for Malcolm Pirine Contract 12-19-06: Malcolm Pirinedelivers Fee Matrix for proposal 12-20-06: Staff request revised Scope of Services for proposal to math Fee Matrix. 12-22-06: Malcolm Pirine revised Fee Matrix received. 1-08-07: Work Order picked up by Malcolm Pirine for sigmture. 1-17-07: Work Order in system for signatures; Norm Feder has signed; Release from Purchasing Pending 1-19-07: Work Order rejected by pUlchasing- due to Consultant not using fixed fees. 1-23-07: New Proposal received from Consultant 1-25-07: Work Order Ready for Pickup by Consultant 1-26-07: Consultant Picked up WOo 2-08-07: WO went through signature approval and pending purchasing approval & PO release 2-9-07: Notice to Proceed for Malcolm Pirne sent (F-17) - COMPLETE - Wilson Miller - Annual Consulting Services - WilsonMiller- Scope of Services received for $30,000.00 from WilsonMiller; Requires Comnittee Approval. Committee approved $30,000.00 - Work Order issued JWlUary 23, 2006. 8-21-06-Ongoing 1-17-06: Reciept offmal invoice from WilsonMiller pendng, following final invoice PO will be closed. (F-13) - COMPLFTL - BOND Resolution & Execttive Summary - Coordination with Scott Teach based on WilsonMiller cost estimate. 6-12~06: Scott teach met with Smykowsky & will be working with Finance Board. 6-27-06: Meeting scheduled for 6--28-06 7-18-06: BCC to approve on 7-25-06 - Resolution to put on election ballot for bond issue 8-7-06: Scott Teach reports ballot will be by Mail and not by actual vote onNov. 7, 2006-As per Jennifer Edwards Spvr of Elections. 8-21-06: Tessie Uploaded new resolution superseding2006-201- consent agenda-bee 9-12~06 9-12-06: BCC Approved Bond Resulution. Approval by voters on Nmember 7, 2006 required. 11-08-06: Confirmation from Scott Teach that Bond Issue has been approved by Voters (F-24) -COMPLFTED - Two Staff Gauges 11-08-06: Fogg moved to install the staff gauges. 12~04-06: Issue of Purchase Order pending for Work Order 12-13-06: NTP- Work Order -$1.200.00 (90 days) 2-14-07: Committee consensus is to cancel this contract. Staff concurs with recommendal:ion, PO will be calcelled. (F-17) ~ COMPLI:TF - Water Flow Data Loggers (and related request for verification of water levels throughout the Forest Lakes Community) 5 11114/2007 16/ A 9 7~22-03: Purchase Order for $6,000.00 Project Cost ($2,000,00 installation and $4,000.00 material) issued to WilsonMiller for installation of water-level recorders. 3-3-06: Gordon River Outflow Meeting with: ClarerL:e Tears, SFWMD; Eugene Calvert, Director Stormwater Dept.;Jerry Kurtz, Stonnwater Dept.; Darryl Riclmd, MSTU Project Manager; and Craig Pajer, Consultant, WilsonMiller. Clarence Tears states it meeting that if the Forest Lakes MSTU Cat provide data that the lowering ofthe Gordon River Oltflow Weir Structure (to allow fer better flow of water from MSTU) is justifiable that the SFWMD would consider such a proposal to lower the outflow level at the weir structure. 3-6-06: Request sent to WilsonMiller (Criag Pajer) to verify the operational status of the water level recorders. 3-30-06: Request sent to WilsonMiIler for verificationrelated to the warranty of the recorders and location and operation of the recorders, 5-11-06: Staff Project Manager Darryl Richard request all data related to the installed recorders and status of the recorders and data obtained. 6-2-06: WilsonMiller Project Manager Craig Pajer delivers electronic files containing data recorded. A report indicating the significance ofthe data was not provided by WilsonMiller. There has not been any documeIi: produced by consultant analyzing arxtIor summarizing the data collected, 8-9-06: Committee Voted to wthorize $15,000.00 for the purchase of new (water level) flow meters for Forest Lakes MSTU. 8-21-06: Staff research online indicates that there are a variety ofprodl.l:ts available and consultation with Stormwater Department indicates that there are products which SFWMD prefers for use in this application. 8-29-06: Stormwater Project Manager Jeny Kurtz meets with MSTU Project Manager to review the proposal, Jerry recommends contact with Tim Howard ofSFWMD to determine which product best suits the needs of Forest Lakes MSTU. 9-1-06: Phone consult with Tim Howard indicates that the method for obtaining 'verifiable' d<ta which is "defensible' is utilizing a product that both records the data and automatically sends it for processing. Estimated cost of product and installation of such a system is $40,000.00. Vendors were reviewed for type of product offered: Campbell Scientific; Hydro lab Products; and YSI Products. Engineering Consultation was recommended from County Stormwater Dept and from SFWMD for installatiCll and continuous monitor of system ani data collected. The possibility of tie into the existing SFWMD data base collection system was mentioned (F-19) - COMPLE"!"]: - Asphalt Repair (3 mobilizations) Pot hole repair aId other ($25,000) 8-18-06 - Bonnes to pick up WO 8-21-06 - waiting on bonnes signature 8-22-06: Bonness signed WO; issue of PO pending. 8-31-06: PO sent to Bonness; 9-19-06: Bonnes confirms that repair areas are marked and areas are approved by Project Mmager. 10-18-06: Bonness crews are onsite rmking repairs to pot-holes (1st mobilization). On Monday 10/23/06 Bonness will re-mobilize for additional repairs. 10-31-06: Bonness Paver repairs completed. (F-22) C< )MPl.FTI: - Obtaining Additional Scope ofSelVices for Annual Consultant; at the request of Committee Chairman and A TM Department Director Liason Staff is obtaining alternate Sc~e of SelVices from Collier CouIty Annual Vendor List and other private sector Engineering Firms. 10-5-06: Request for Scope ofSelVices sent to annual vendors on Engineering Annual Contract. 11-7-06: List of Firms submitting quote recorded. Staffrecommems Special Meeting for review of proposals. (F-24) C(JMPLFll.:- MSTU Committee directs staff to meet with SFWMD concening the installation of water level recorders. Meeting is to have Dept Director Diane Flagg, Project Mananger Darryl Richard, Consultant Craig Pajer, Clearance Tears SFWMD, Eugene Calvert, Dir. Stormwater Dept, and one representative from Forest Lakes MSTU Committee (recommended was Chairman Bob Jones). 10-12-06: Committee directs staff to set up meeting and obtain selVices from Mancan for minutes. 10-25-06: SFWMD recommends installation of staff gauges, WilsonMiller to provide quote for installations; In reversal of previous recommendation - installation of electronic recording devices is not recommended and determined to be WI-necessary, (F-21 b}- COMPI.].TI: Shenandoah Construction - Quail Forest Blvd. Desilting (includes surrounding areas within Forest Lakes MSTUj 9-13-06: Forest Lakes MSTU Committee approved project for Shenandoah Construction based on Annual Contract rates. 10-10-06: Shenandoah Construction submits quote based on $15,000.00 amount with invoicing to be as per completion of each section based on contract rates. Project is complete invoicing is pending. Shendoah invoiced for $13,718.25 (F-21a}- ('OMPLETE -Shenandoah Construction- Woodshire Ditch. Desilting Project 8-9-06 - Committee voted on an up to $15,000 to get clearing and restoring the drainage swale at woodshire dich (east to west portion. 8-21-06- Pending Quote from Shenaldoah - annual 8-31-06: PO sent to Shenandoah for project. 9.12-06: Project 80% complete 9.15-06: Project 100% complete. (F-14) CANCELLED- Woodshire Lane - Re-grading/Cutting of ROW Edge & Sod Installation 8-9-06 - Committee approved up to limit- pending Quotes coming in. 8-21-06 - WO # assigned and to be picked up by Bonness (4,962.64) 9~1-06: WO returned from Bonness and forwarded to GIIXia Herrera for review/Sharon then to Norm Feder 9-12-06: Need approval for $4,962.64 for project. 6 11/14/2007 16 JA 9 9-13-06: Committee selected not to approve necessary funding for project. (F-12) COMPLETE - Committee member Roger SommelVilIe reI. to Swale #15 and nearby Lake; Liason Staff Project Manager and Consultant to review project to determine any outstanding items and also the level of the Lake in relatirn to the swale level. 8-31-06: WilsonMiIler Craig P~er reports site inspected and no problems or punch list items. Victor (Engineering Tech) performed inspection 9-7-06: Staff Project Manager meeting with Craig Pajer confirms WilsonMiller inspection finding no out<;tanding punch-list items. (F-ll) - COMPLFTE-Mail out for Bond Issue Referendum 8-9-06: George Fogg moved to ftmd a mailing to registered voters inorder to explain the ballot, this will be done by staff. 8-21-06: Staff will coordinae with Committee Chairman Bob Jones for content of mail -out. Man Can will provide the assistance for mailing. 9-13-06: MSTU Committee 9-12-06: County Attorney Scott Teach md Committee Chairman sign off on mailing. 9.19-06: Mancan services sent out mailing. (F-IO) - COMPLLTL - Pump System Repair- Emergency repair of Forest Lakes Pump System on 7/28/06. 7-28-06: Florida Irrigation Supply (FIS) repairs pump system for Forest Lakes as an emergency call for $600.00. 8-02-06: Purchase Order issued to FIS for repair cost Invoicing is to Forest Lakes MSTU. 8-10-06: F1S invoice for $800.00 exceeds quote. Staff request FIS to re-invoice for correct amolU1t. (F-9) - CUMPI ,1:1"1,: - Lake # 6- Villas Drainage Improvement- Craig Pager- County Attorneys- To determine if the project scope is within the authorization of the MSTU Ordinance. 8-23-06: RLS sent to Scott Teach for determination of weather the scope of proposed project is authorized by Ferest Lakes MSTU Ordinance. 9-1-06: Liaison Staff receives notification from Scott Teach that the scope goes beyond what is authorized by Forest Lakes MSTU Ordinance. Project is not authorized by Forest Lakes MSTU Ordinance as it is not 'roadway related drainage'. (F-8) CC);..1PLETE - Roadway Signage and Pavement Marking Study- Installation of Signs - COMPLETED- Committee approved for signage--committee chairman has requested that consultant review and revise the quantity of signs. 4-17-06; PO issued to Lykins for $12,045.00; Lykins begins work on 4-17.06. 5-15.06 - NTP given - project under construction - estimated to be done 5-20-06 5-24-06-Project Complete-need to have final walk-through. 7-18-06 - FINAL INSPECTION - PROJECT COMPLETE (F-7) COMPLETE -. Painting of Markings -Quotes requested from new Collier County AnnualContractor Trutwin (Fort Myers Location). 5-30-06; Quote from Trutwin based on annual contract for traffic markings pending 6-12-06: Trutwini requested new drawings with textthat is legable from Wilson MilIer:- no drawings reced. 6-27-06: Submitted PO request on 6-27-06 7-12 -06 : Project completed (F-6) -C()MPLU'I:- New Committee member selected Mr. Fogg-BCC Approved on 9/13/05 Complete: BCC Approved Fogg, (F-5) COMPI.ETE- SWALE #15 - Kyle Construction 100% complete- need consultant report on final inspection. 4-17-06; Need WilsonMiIler notifirntion of Final Inspeciton. 6/12/06 - Project complete - waiting on WM to submit letter of final completion. 627.06 - Project complete- waiting on WM to submit letter of final completion. 7-12-06 - Craig Pager to meet with DuTyI- final completion documentation 8-7-06: Substantial Completion with Punch-list complete (F4) - COMPLETE .Swale # 7 & 10 Regrade; WM has completed design. WM completing Bidding with Annuals. 4-17-06; Work Order for Higgins pending 5-15-06, NTP - 5-8-06 - ON Higgins - Wilson Miler performing construction observatioo 6-12-06, Construction Reports from Wilson, Miller- Pending (50% completed) 6-27-06: Waiting on report from Wilson Miller 7-12-06 . Craig Pager to meet with Qmyl- final completion documentation 8-7-06: Substantial Completion with Punch-list complete (F 3) - c()MPI.FIT - Swale # 2 Regrade;m WM has completed design WM completing Bidding with Annuals. 4-17-06; Work Order for Higgins pending 5.15-06, NTP - 5-8-06 - DN Higgins - Wilson Miller performing construction observatioo. 6-12-06 Completed - need report frem Wilson Miller 6-27-06 Completed- need report from Wilson Miller 7-12-06 - Craig Pager to meet with Ilrrryl- final completion documentation 7 11/14/2007 'fl !),W\ L 'j' '" A 8-7-06: Final Completion Document Executed 9 (F-2) - COMPLI..TI:: - Woodshire Lane Overl~ Project-}" Overlay of Woods hire Lane, Committee Approved $48,000.00 for this project. 5-15-06 - Work Order- picked up by Contractof- waiting for signature. - Contractor schedule - Mid June to begin. 5-30-06; Construction to begin on 5-31-06 field meeting to held. 6-27 -06: Completed- and final inspection requested. 7-12-06 - Craig Pager to meet with DuTyI - final completion documentation 8-7-06: Final Completirn Document Executed. (F-I) COMPL[.:TF - Pump Generator- 8-9-06 - Committee voted to renla generator if its needed in an emergency 8 16lA 9 sillery t Subject: Russell Edghill [EDGHILLR@pfm.com] Wednesday, October 10, 2007 11 :28 AM christopher1.hall@bmo.com; Alecia M. Ingram; ddraper@bmolaw.com; dlichty@bmolaw.com; Crystal K. Kinzel; Daniel Tripaldi; Derek M. Johnssen; BrilhartBrenda; RichardDarryl; weigel_d; flagg_d; muddj; Yonkoskyj; ochsJ; IsacksonMark; PettitMichael; smykowski_m; ValdesOdalys; newman_s; usher_s; teachscott@colliergovnet; sillery_t; rjones657 @comcast.net; bevin.presutti@mbia.com; dbergamini@ngn-tampa.com; smiller@ngn- tampa.com; tgiblin@ngn-tampa.com; Hal CANARY; Sergio Masvidal; jeff.alexander1 @usbank.com; timothy.miller3@usbank.com Re: Collier County (FL) Limited GO Bonds (Forest LakesRoadway and Drainage MSTU), Series 2007 From: Sent: To: Good Morning: The above-referenced transaction has successfully closed. all for your hard work and congratulations to the County. Thank you Best Regards, Russell Edghill Consultant Public Financial Management, Inc. 300 South Orange Ave. Suite 1170 Orlando, FL 32801 (PI 407.648.2208 (FI 407.648.1323 edghillr@pfm.com 1 IiihFM" ~ The PFM Group Public Financial Management, Inc. PFM Asset Management LLC PFM Advisors , A LlIn6J' Suite 1170 300 S. Orange Avenue Orlando, FL 32801-3470 402,2208 407-648-1323 fax www.pfm.com MEMORANDUM TO: Working Group FROM: Russell Edghill, Public Financial Management, Inc. DATE: October 10,2007 RE: Collier County, Florida Limited General Obligation Bonds (F orest Lakes Roadway and Drainage Municipal Service Taxing Unit), Series 2007 Final ~ Closing Wiring Instructions I. SCHEDULE Pre-Closing Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 Time: 3:30 PM EDT Place: BOCC Conference Room, 3" Floor Closing Date: Wednesday, October 10,2007 Time: II :00 AM EDT Place: Via Telephone II. AMOUNTS DUE AT CLOSING Par Amount of2007 Bonds Plus: Net Original Issue Premium Less: Underwriter's Discount Purchase Price Less: Good Faith Deposit Amount Due from Underwriter $6,215,000.00 30,814.30 (32,628.75) $6,213,185.55 (62,500.00) $6,150,685.55 P;PM' ~ III. 161 )- J.i Collier County, FL Closing Memorandum Page 2 APPLICATION OF BOND PROCEEDS From Harris A. To Collier County for project fund and cost of issuance in the amount of $6,] ]5,]85.55 Wirinll Instructions Bank: Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati, OH ABA #: 042000314 Acct# 113-8577 For: Forest Lakes LOO Bond Collier County Board of County Commissioners Contact: Lisa N. Melvin (239) 774-5438 B. To MB]A Insurance Corporation (MBlA) for the Bond Insurance Premium $35,500.00 Wiriml Instructions Bank: JP Morgan Chase Bank ABA#: 021000021 For: MBIA Insurance Corporation Premium Account A/C#: 910-27-721728 Policy #: 502780 Attention: Clifford Pritchard (914-765-3056) Total Wires from Harris ........ ..... .............. ..... ...................... ........................................ $6,150,685.55 9 ~ .' IV. 161 A 9 Collier County, FL Closing Memorandum Page 3 APPLICATION OF A V AILABLE FUNDS A. Bond Proceeds received by County an d MBIA From Harris - Closing Wires ............................................................................... $6,150,685.55 From Harris - Good Faith Deposit............................................................................... 62.500.00 Total.................................................................... ................................................. $6,213,185.55 Allocation of Bond Proceeds Costs of Issuance................................................. ...................................................... $78,700.00 Bond Insurance Premium .......... .............................................................................. .... 35,500.00 Project Fund...... ................... ..................................................... .................... ......... 6.098.985.55 Total.............................................................. ....................................................... $6,213,185.55 V. DELIVERY OF BONDS Upon confirmation of the wire transfers, Bond Counsel and the Paying Agent/Registrar will instruct the Depository Trust Company to release the 2007 Bonds to Harris for redelivery. . un II". ~~ ~. . abS g i c. g .P nil ....~ h ~ :1' " o iil 2l. c- O> ,.. '" U> s:: ~ c ;:: 0> U> '" ~ -c .9. '" Sl en g. '" Q. C iD ;g;>>~ai~.~N:::: ;:; ~li!:lg8~S~~ z . HU!UH l UiHnU . ~~~~.~t.t ~ ~~tttt'~l ~UhHn ! !nUHi( 3~ill~c49'!D::::'" WN~"':""Ol51i" ~<" ~!:~-l-4' :-.. -4-4-4.....'-1 ~ ~i;~~~~i ~ iii~!!ii:r ig~HiU~ ~ HUU~~~ . Of%~. --. -i U' .-~~~.. !f~QnHi ~ Uhhi~l i;H~~~~~~HHH[ ~ ~~sa~Ci)&g.!!.~ !il aa!!.!!.!!.r~ !\ ~~i~HIH ~ HUh~: ] 71<" ;:'~ lil....2;!-<:t <<< U'Il.o>-,.... E': II ~ii!." 5'";:;15.....8 ~ ~~;38b1j,!! 11l ~,~~ _or Oorro5 -4 <' 2;'~ ii\r,," -4 rO'Tl'olr! 0 c. ,,' ,,,,'.r q ~r'.-."n:'" .... lI>-< "...,., I!:."Tl ",' z 0" . 2;' ",;;", C'l ~,,~ m !;l lI>. g- ~ ,Q . , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. .. '< N .. 8 r ~ . ,+ "\~";~ '1<1 .:t:. '-0 f $ $ " $ ~ l- t/) ::E t/)~ w.... ::ic ..JZ I-~ t/)IL. W D:: o IL. " 'n; II. Oi ::I - U oc(E/}ER-ER-EfJ.EA-ER-tftEA-~ m '" N ~ ~ Oel> 0... ON ~18 16'1 A 9 ~ , ~:) C) CJ ;:~ .;:y '" E 0 -, <:;) in r~ c:) '" ..[ :; ,n CJ c> 'D '" - .t I ,- 0 ,-, ;::. ,. U) <c' m Co L ., ,oo .." iY. " Il '_f'; '..'1 , , n 'i.~ .. ci a: ~ c_ .,- co. o ~ f/) :~ .~ ti c g. ~ .Q) uwen ., ; >- :u Z g. ~ :pO a.. c " ."' {l.. l'l c: 13'c,~ _.'.. c: ~<P.Q~_~aJ Uu....J.c,:; ..... Q Q N ..; .... ... CI) ..c E CI) > o Z o .~ ., ~:) en m .'" .. ,- Q) 5~ Ii: en Q) 0)': (ij c.c > .- f/) 0 >'"0 E ~ 8 Q) ::I~a: en .", "0 C "i:: 'ii c:.-..o ~ m m Q) 0 ...J:;01- Q) "' .20 (:0 Q) 0 . en 0 gE~ - Q)" - .c ...J ~SQ) >O.c a: en I- - -- -..-. - - ~oma~ONmao~o~oaaaoa~aooao~oaoagM~ooo~ momONM~~OO~O a~oooowaoooo~oooo ~m~oo ~ ..... - . . . . .. ........ - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~_~8~g~~~R8g~gSg~gg~g~ggggg~gggggwR~ggOS ~Svo~~~oomm~o~o5oM~~~OOOM~oo~oo~a~~~~M~O ~ =..O~~maooo roao~~e ~OON~M~ ~N~ riNONNN~~N~.!- >~m mOOWM ~~M~~~~ ~ NvovNN ~MM <C( ~ ~m~o_ S - fI')<r---...... NltJ~O~~ "l~-.. ~(Q C"')......'V T"""T'""fO ER-ER-ER-ER-EA-EA-EA-ER-ER-ER-EA-EA-.EA-ER-ER-ER-ER-EA-ER-ER-EA-EA-ER-ER-ER-ER-ER-ER-ER-EA-ER-ER-ER-EA-EA- . . C"", 6 n C) ~ ~) '..11 ,- , '" CO '" ~ lOSN~ M i 0 m el> ~ ~ r- '" a lll;; 0 N"'''' on 0 '" ... "'0 on m ~~mo .n l ci N N cOm ~ "'00 00 t--...--vt-- 0 r- ~ 00 "'N l8. .. ::1m ~ ...-coO>()) m ... ~ II) on -~ a:ici-a:i aj ::I .- ! ~ ~ -" "'''' ~ 0 u c o~ ~ .. c( ., ~ ~ wi " - W ~thER>thEflEfltA-fA.69-tA-E:R- .'!l c Q) .s 's E 8 ~ER>f1t tA-f1tf1tf1tflltA-fA-f1t 69-. ,,-, SaSS SoSolo 0000 00000 "CI oog"o oacicil-o _a;oo 0 00000 "CI -v0-v...- -v 0 1.0 0 a iji,,;t..,;gfg g~~~S'~ siN NO> or- or- ~..- c( - -~ - ~ to _f1ttA-fIltA-tA-tA-tA-fIlfA.fIltA-f1t__f1ttA-f1ttA-tA-f1tf1tf1ttA- ,:_) '. C-, "'-', (:'" OJ , '-) , C) 'j :;) ,.-, UJ ';, ,i'} <f} f1ttA- EA-EA- EA-EA-f1t EA-M- 'I> ,.,) 'I'" 00 00 gg on~ N'"4"- oooooooooooooooogoo 0000000000000000 00 ocicicicicicicig.ocidcicidcicicig' 00000000 000000000 OOOMooo~mor-O..-I.OI.OM'"4"~oa g~~ NN~M~~g~~~m~~~~z ..- CO') It)Olt) lJ')lt)it{ M~-.:i ~~ EA-tA-f1ttA-EA-tA-tA-tA-EA-f1tf1tEA- tA-EA-f1tf1ttA-f1tfA-f1tfA.fA.tA-tA-f1ttA-f1tEA-f1ttA-f1ttA-tA-f1ttA- xl-w ~uzw~ m...J 0 ~ 0 ~ ~~~ &~~~~ fu:;~ ~ eno ~z~ U ~u ~ I- :;C(I- Z a:woen a:OI-Z z~:; ~ ~u Z ~~uenen2:;:;~~0>1 enoa:oo~ ~~~oo ~enw~~ ~~z~uO a:Z::lO@:;ooc(c(uw ~zl-enl- wOa:~ Xl-z~c(~ wzzwo~ I- o-a:wuwa:a:>>~a:. u.c(enwI o~wa:w ~ _ W I-I-W a:u.u.>>enl- I-Ou.'n~ m~wu w>l-~enc(c(uo ~ ~ Z en U Uo II. a: a: a: a: a: en 0 Z U o:::! !:: w - - > en 0 ;:;: Wo O::l o~ a: ~ a: a: u. en 0 >wwo~enwwoowwenz~-I-a:wuuoeno~zwu...JI-~I-I-I-I-~w>w>~ :;::la:-en u.u.u.w5= u~a:-z wc(-=~ _ ~ lD Ol-zlL~-~~~~en_ww wa:u.a:c(~en a:c(>~c(--wwen~~ c(enwzoo~~a:a:zon.u.>a:a:wl-~a:l-z~wa:g~!::~~OOz~~~ a:w>c(zzc(c(a:a:c(o oa:w5Ienw~~wC>IW~c(~c(c(c(QQc(enwenw~ ::l>woooa:a:c(c(a:WZ::l:; I-O...J a:Uwl-lL~a: a:~~~a: u~a:...Jmml-l-uul-z~WenW~OlLw~IL~...JOO~l-ul-l-mml-a:a:~ N C") 'It It) co ,.... co Q) ~ ;: .. .., - - 'It'''co,,,,, ClOcnO_NM'lt"'CD ,....cocn ______NNNNNNNNNN ., '" .... ..,.., .., .. - .., .., ~ ~ ~ Fiala c~_'--- Halas ~____c._- Henning.._.LR----- g~r~~ta~EST LAKES 1.'6il"i I A ~t: i : Ro.\D\\\ \ \ND 1H~\Ii\\( a :\I.S.I.\ ~.U"'''' ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FL 34104 SUMMARY OF MINUTES & MOTIONS November 14,2007 III. Approval of Agenda William Seabury moved to approve the agenda. Second by George Fogg. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. IV. Approval of Minutes - October 10, 2007 George Fogg moved to approve the Minutes October 10, 2007. Second by William Seabury. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. V. B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard Stripping & Reflectors Project (F-36) - A quote was submitted from Bonness in the amount of $42,663.93. It was noted that a large portion of the quote $27,544.65 was for Thermoplastic Pavement Markings. (See attached) George Fogg moved to approve the proposal for the marking of the roads not to exceed $40,000. Discussions ensued noting the proposal amount was $42,663.93. Without a second the motion was withdrawn. George Fogg moved to amend the motion to approve $43,000 for the stripping and painting of Forest Lakes, Woodshire, and the side streets. Second by William Seabury. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. Misc. Corres: Date: ) :; "! I" ~~<:. ;-:; ':i :1 ~~ut~0 '~.,.'i>:'i ,~, :Ir'~;'.:;'.~.,>~c!'<; Item#: ~c).eo.; to ... A-, 16 I H-<'.~9:';v;:iJ fl.'. .,,, F()REST LAKES ROAD\\\\\:";!) I>R\I\M.F \I.S.r~e" ,\. ,:",\:;d:IiI",';'.";,Y:'':':3 ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FL 34I04 Fiala ---.----- Halas--r(td...f---=.: Henr1lf'\9--- . Coyle-A=. --€/---- Coletta ~---------- November 14, 2007 Minutes I. Meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. by Robert Jones. Quorum was established. II. Attendance Members: Harold Bergdoll (Excused), William Seabury, George Fogg, Robert Jones, Virginia Donovan County: Darryl Richards - Project Manger, Tessie Sillery - Operations Coordinator, Caroline Soto-Budget Analyst Other: Chris Tilman - Malcolm Pirnie, Darlene Lafferty - Mancan Robert Jones requested a cost breakdown on the Bond Project. Darryl Richard stated he would provide the PFM report that was of public record. The recommendation was made for Sharon Newman or Mark Isackson to attend the December 12, 2007 meeting. III. Approval of Agenda William Seabury moved to approve the agenda. Second by George Fogg. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. IV. Approval of Minutes - October 10, 2007 George Fogg moved to approve the Minutes October 10, 2007. Second by William Seabury. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. V. Transportation Services A. Budget - Caroline Soto distributed and reviewed the Budget Report. (See attached) 1. Operating Expense Budget $312,600 2. Total Available Operating Expense $223,802.11 B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard, Chris TilmanlMalcome Pirnie was distributed & reviewed. (See attached) . Stripping & Reflectors Project (F-36) - A quote was submitted from Bonness in the amount of $42,663.93. It was nGtilld Itbatsa large portion of the quote $27,544.65 was for Thermoplastic Pavement Markings. (See attached) Date Item'; -.."';',,<:':.tc It/A 9 George Fogg noted Woodshire was not listed & should be included on the bid. George Fogg moved to approve the proposal for the marking of the roads not to exceed $40,000. Discussions ensued noting the proposal amount was $42,663.93. Without a second the motion was withdrawn. George Fogg moved to amend the motion to approve $43,000 for the stripping and painting of Forest Lakes, Woodshire, and the side streets. Second by William Seabury. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. Darryl Richard reviewed the Swale Scope Project Schedule stating upon completion of the RWA Survey documents concerning easement language would be submitted to the Golf Club Board & BCC for approval. Darryl Richard reported there are internal drainage issues throughout the Forest Lakes Community. It was noted the culverts were not clogged. He also stated there was public interest in asphalt overlays for the Cul-de-sac areas. Noted that before applying overlays the minor drainage issues would need to be resolved. The Swale Project was the primary objective and would proceed as scheduled. Chris Tilman reported there is an existing Storm Water Permit for the Irrigation System that was installed in 1978. He stated the Swale proposal is a modification to the existing System and a General Permit could be issued. Darryl Richard distributed & reviewed the Project Schedule. (See attached) Re-addressed the Committee request to advance some projects. Chris Tilman stated the Cul-de-sac overlay schedule could be advanced. Recommended contacting the home owners to discuss the planting of vegetation in the drainage swale. VI. Old Business A. Bond Issue Project - Darryl Richard distributed Memorandum on Limited General Obligation Bonds from The PFM Group. Robert Jones posed the following questions: 1. Requested a break down for the $182,000 fees paid for the bonds to be issued. Including the County Groups and what percentage of the total did they receive for services. 2 16/A 9 2. When the bonds were sold was the expected return received or was a premium paid. Darryl Richard will forward the questions to Mark Isackson and Sharon Newman and would be answered at the December 12, 2007 meeting. Virginia Donovan questioned the rate at which the bond was issued. Was the rate locked in or was it subject to change. Robert Jones responded the rate was locked in but could not confirm the rate. Also requested the total interest cost. VII. New Business A. Committee Member Attendance Requirements - Darryl Richard reviewed County Ordinance #86-41 Section 8 applicable to Advisory Board Members. Stated any Board member shall be automatically removed under the following conditions; . Absent from 2 consecutive Board meetings without a satisfactory excuse. . Absent from more than 50% of the board meetings in a given fiscal yr. . Deemed absent when not present during 75% the meeting. VIII. Public Comments - None IX. There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 11 :40 A.M. Forest lakes Roadway and Drainage MSTU Advisory Committee /~~ These minutes ')(roved by the Committee on as presented or amended ~Qv 1;;(, l DO, , The next meeting will be on December 12, 2007 10:00 a.m. Collier County Transportation Building, East Conference Room 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Fl 34104 3 ---._.~-.,-, 161 A 9 F()REST LAKES Fiala /~~'j- Halas -r.'J;.I""'" ... .. H enning ..~. ......._~.......... Coyip.. ... ..... Colett" . ......... RO\D\\\\\NB IH{\IN,\CI: \1."'.1.1. ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FL 341f1l January 9, 200f Aaenda I. Call to Order II. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes - December 12, 2007 V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget - Caroline Soto B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard, Chris Tillman/ Malcome Pirine VI. Old Business A. Bond Issue Project - Sharon Newman/Transportation Operations Manager, Mark Isackson/Budget Analyst VII. New Business VIII. Public Comments IX. Adjournment The next meeting will be on February 13, 2008 10:00 a.m. Collier County Transportation Building, East Conference Room 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 Mise Corres I i.P l A-q Date l~em #...___.__"_._-- 1 tc 16 I n 9 Ff)REST LA.KES !{O\IlW\\\ND URAIN \(;1 \LS.I.I . Fia\~ ----.----.. Halas Henrllng....... .... .--.'" Gayle - Coletta ..... ..-.--.....-. .. ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FL 34104 December 12, 2007 Minutes I. Meeting was called to order at 10:07 a.m. by Robert Jones. Quorum was established. II. Attendance Members: Harold Bergdoll, William Seabury, George Fogg, Robert Jones, Virginia Donovan (Excused) County: Darryl Richards - Project Manger, Caroline Sote-Budget Analyst Other: Chris Tilman - Malcolm Pirnie, Darlene Lafferty - Mancan III. Approval of Agenda George Fogg moved to approve the agenda. Second by Harold Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. IV. Approval of Minutes - November 14, 2007 Change: V. B. should read "Striping" & Reflectors Project (F-36) Page 2 Paragraph 8 should read "existing Surface Water Management Permit for Quail Run issued in 1982." George Fogg moved to approve the Minutes of November 14, 2007 as amended. Second by Harold Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. George Fogg thanked the MSTU for the striping. V. Transportation Services A. Budget - Caroline Soto distributed and reviewed the Budget Report. (See attached) 1. Improvements General available $3,542,100.00 Line item 39 Total Budget amount of $6,289,283.88 was questioned. Caroline Soto responded the amount was loan proceeds (from the Bond Issue.) It was noted that the attendance of Mark Isakson or Sharon INewBlmf> was requested to answer the questions from the November 14, 2007 meeting concerning the Bond Issue. Date_____--- 1 'tern #:_'_' I V tc 161 '-A. .,9 Robert Jones expressed his disappointment in County Staff for not attending. Diane Flagg arrived 10:26 Diane Flagg reported County Staff does not have the expertise to answer Bond Issue questions. The questions have been forwarded to the Finance Committee & will be answered accordingly. Requested Caroline Soto pursues with the Finance Committee & report to the MSTU Committee before the January 9, 2008 meeting. B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard, Chris TllmanlMalcome Pirnie was distributed & reviewed. (See attached) . Pot Hole Repairs (F-25) 1. Recommended approval for $11,491.66 Bonness quote for overlay of Pot Hole repairs which included Manhole risers 2. Recommended approval for additional monies to continue Pot Hole repairs throughout the year George Fogg moved to approve the Work Order in the amount of $11,491.66 to continue with Pot Hole Repairs. Second by Harold Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. Discussions ensued & was determined the funds used from the previous Fiscal Year for ongoing Pot Hole repairs was very effective. George Fogg moved to approve $30,000 ongoing Pot Hole & overlay work for this Fiscal Year. Second by William Seabuty. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. Chuck Stem pies - Mira Vista Board Member stated the Pot Holes were not repaired in Mira Vista. Darryl Richard responded that the repairs for Mira Vista are included in the additional monies that were approved in the above motion. Robert Jones requested Chris Tilman inspect the area in question to determine the necessary repairs. Darryl Richard reported the Bond Issue Projects in the future will be included on the Project Status Report. The Committee reviewed the Bond Issue Projects and the Individual Project Tracking (F-37) timeline. Discussions ensued concerning the Swale drainage problems that extend from Woodshire Lane to Pine Ridge Rd. Chris Tilman responded that a field crew would examine the Internal Drainage System & noted the following: . Advancement of the Regrade on the Project Schedule would occur after determining the location of drainage issues 2 16/ A 9 . Upon competition of the Regrade the Overlay Project would commence Discussions continued. Darryl Richard requested design parameters from Chris Tilman. Ed Draguw - Mira Vista Board Member relayed disappointment from the Community conceming the overlay that was scheduled to be completed by this time. Diane Flagg noted the "anticipated' project start date is the end of January 2008. She questioned the Project Scope limits. Chris Tilman reviewed the Project Scope as: 1. Overlay entire length of Quail Forest Blvd. to include the Entrance. 2. Drainage corrections from Pine Ridge Rd. to the end of Quail Forest Blvd. Discussions ensued concerning the plants in the drainage swales. It was noted a ROW permit & submission of Landscape Plans is required. Discussions ensued concerning the Golf course Easement Language. Chris Tilman stated a draft form would be submitted for Golf Course Board review & comments. George Fogg announced he would not be attending the January 9, 2008 meeting. VII. New Business - None VIII. Public Comments - None IX. There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned by the Chair at 11 :50 A.M. Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage MSTU Advisory Committee ~~~* ~ ~ Robert Jones, Chair These minutes approved by the Committee on [ - q ~ f!) 9 as presented v or amended v- 3 161 A 9 The next meeting will be on January 9, 2007 10:00 a.m. Collier County Transportation Building, East Conference Room 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 4 _....,1 A,9 161 F()REST LAKES RO \0\\\ '\ND DI~ \I'\\U \1.".1.1. ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FL 34104 SUMMARY OF MINUTES & MOTIONS December 12, 2007 III. Approval of Agenda George Fogg moved to approve the agenda. Second by Harold Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. IV. Approval of Minutes - November 14, 2007 Change: V. B. should read "Striping" & Reflectors Project (F-36) Page 2 Paragraph 8 should read "existing Surface Water Management Permit for Quail Run issued in 1982." George Fogg moved to approve the Minutes of November 14, 2007 as amended. Second by Harold Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. V. B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard . Pot Hole Repairs (F-25) 1. Recommended approval for $11,491.66 Bonness quote for overlay of Pot Hole repairs which included Manhole risers 2. Recommended approval for additional monies to continue Pot Hole repairs throughout the year George Fogg moved to approve the Work Order in the amount of $11,491.66 to continue with Pot Hole Repairs. Second by Harold Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. George Fogg moved to approve $30,000 ongoing Pot Hole & overlay work for this Fiscal Year. Second by William Seabury. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. ::) I- """ II) 0 :::E 0 N II)mN' W........ ~C... ::izll I-::)E II)LLCD w U 0:: CD o C LL -, 1_'. :t!'" . '11 A 9 0>0 "'0 NO ~o ~'" 0'" 0'" o~ 0'" 0'" .; ON 0.. 6"; ~'" ...- ~o - ... '. Q. "ii :> - u e(fifiER-EA-fiER-fiER-ER-ER-tIt E &; g <( .- ,') 0 co t:: (00 o"(fj (-0" c1') t:: E ('J o ill V >- 0:: i.n if) (/1 U. C) C) o C) ;::)0 .::) 0 00 '.(; (~J ro~~;g~ coloocio:i {{)O<:;!"0JO (.q (') N {',J to 0Jro([","T~ "' N (/)U)if)U)'J}i.f)(/)U) In o liE,., ~.. c S IV .- U CD-~m.g~ Q, "'C._'H.... o (Qa.~:J 00_ ~ C::UlU_ u .. >- .~ ~~ ~ i5,Jl >.{l EO ,- _ Q) 0 '5.!!! 1: g2 "- .... :J > L,L. u j! (I) . fI) c';12,~"O:S~1i ,QJ e CD c: ('Q Q) 0 Cfl'lCfl~::i!Of- l:: 1l ., ~ .. .. 0 E ~ c Jj '2: 0 c.i .. .. IV .=~~" .. 0 z .oo1l [1- .CflO ~ ",UQ. u c: .. .. :n fI) co C .. c:E ~>< ... c:=-"'C~ '" 0 ~ -~ ~ c c '0 'C :J .S U <(- ~ ><- c:~".. o OJ 0 en ,.,'" IV O.J:: muU::.s ~~ ::i!C::Cflf- 00 00 60 00 "'~ N~- r--CJ')lJ)C>>OlOONCOOOt::'O 00 ,.....("')(O')O)O("o,l(").q-I.OOO.O 01.0 CD ............. ci~ 4-~~g~g~~~~gg~g 00 ~B~q~~~~~CJ')~~q~q .OM ~OCJ')M~~OroO OOOO_lO ~~ >~a NOOOOCOM 1.0_(0')_ lOlO _ N _mo ..... - ~_- - - -~ID - M_. fifiER-fifiER-fiEA-fiEA-fifi~_fiER-fiER-ER-ER-ER-ER-fiER-ER-fifiER-ER-ER-MfifiER-ER-ER-fiER- .....o~ 00<0 cricr--: "'000 ...000 o~ ..... OOCOa) 0000..... oaoace) 0000(0') 00000("')"""0 OaOOQIO.....r-.. ocicicici.....:~-o ""':N""': c;:)mO) - lOoN<O '" 0 0 0>0 '" N ..... '" 0 fIJ~~~ "'! NMvLO '" 0 0 '" 0 '" .. "'00 '" !Mf'-.,M ... .....:oq:aio on 0 0 NO ~ ..; . , <<ill'i ;,; :>~ljg 00 r--........vf'-.. 0 0 ~ ~o '" '" '" ~ IV "l .....ooma> 0> o. .... ~'" '" - "'''' 00 ... . . - cOci-~ .; 0 .,.; ::1'-""'(")0> ..... 00 ~ N _'t:ICO-N - <0'" 0 - uc_ ~ "'!- ~ <(.. ~ ~ ~ ... )( W ~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~MMMM~~M~M0~MMM~MM~M~ 11 c .. ' , .5 "e E 8 f:ltfiEA-utMf:A.fA-f:A.f:A.EA-EA-fA.M- 00 o "' o cI) 00 ocr) 01 ,:0 1-:, V, CT, ,~ :) '~J '=-~) 1- 0 ,0 'l:'"" (":. C') '" CO CO 0 1O~ [.'1..... N en ,n ~~mu)m~mvtmm~W~fA.f:A.fA.fA.fA.f:A.EA-fA.fA. o ooS 000000000000000000000 o 000 000000000000000000000 1:1_0 060 cicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicici ~.~ g~e ~eggg~ggg~~ege~g~~~gg ~'t:I~ ~mo N~O~~ NN~~NNONNNID~M~~ -=m moo M .....vavNN .....MM EmN NO) M~a~ ~~ oC - -e M~. - - fA.f:A.EA-fA.f:A.f:A.fA.fA.fA.f:A.f:A.fA.EA-.fA.fA.fA.fA.fA.EA-fA.EA-f:A.fA.fA.f:A.fA.fA.f:A.f:A.fA.fA.fA.fA.fA.fA.fA.fA. X ~w OCUZW~ ~~m~ ~ 0 0 0 Z <( ~~ &XlU~C::1-- ZlU::i!<( <( ~z[ U ~U ~ I-- ~~ ::i!<(~~Oz oc::m~Cfl C::~~~ ZW::i! Z ~U Z ::i! lU0CflCfl::J::i!::i!OOO CflOOOC::UQ. lU~~OO lU~- Z <(f-~O ~<(~::JO@~OO~~U~ lUCflZf-~::J ZOc::- Q.~~~::J CflCflZU gffi~~~~[~~~~~~ *~~8~~~~~~~g~~~5~Cfl~~8~ ~f-lUlUO~Cflffiffiooffi~ Cfl~C::<1--8m~~~CflO~~~OOoffil--f-ffilU~ Cfl::i!::JC::Q.W~~~~~~ w>Q.::i!U C::C::~ZlU<( f->u~f-~I--I--~>> ~~~~~OO~~~~~'" ~~ffic::~ffi~0~~~~ffi~~~~~~~~~ffiffi ~~>~~55~~~~~@ ~~~~B~~~Cfl~~@~~Q.~~~~gg~~~ u~~c::~mmf-f-UUf-Z~lUCflOW~OQ.lU~Q.~~OO~l--ul--f-mml--C::C:: ... N CO') .., In U) t-- <0 en ~ :: ~ ~~~f;;~~ ::! :!: ~ = ~ ~ ~ 2 N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ en 0..... N f") Nt") CO') M f") ~ ~ Gl :; ." Gl ii CI) U Gl "e- ll. ~ Gl 1;; co ::; ::> f0- CI) ::; '" Gl .. co ...J 1;; ~ o u.. i " '" i 's ~ ~ ;, 5' .!! :ii ~ . I. ~. 1 ~ ~~""~:': ~ ~"~'''' f! :;; ...,j...lu.,u,g..i I- S!u.,...Ic: III.... ~ ~ 2:;:~~~.8. 'i~~'" ':;~;,. W ~~~~N~ ~ _~.o ~!i~ [ ~eiifiH ~ ifih~~i~ I rlnul! inUliii ~et~iU.n ~ tii~~!i~~ .~t.iHJif8t-llH.i .,,,Ii ~~ 81nh~ ~ ~1U.; ~~! ~iIT'=H i ~H.dgg. !] ~~~~~: ~ ~~~iili,! ",~t~_n._- . -~~,a~~i$ ~~~H~H~ ~ ~HHH d .iilHHH ~ ~UHHH . Ij~nnn lln~~t!H ~u..aD:::a;a;e:::a:a:: II:: D:::a::a::~zda:dd: . z '!!i;s~S~:g:gb8~ e ::$::!~:!~~~:'!~ lie 16 ! m A 9 9 ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~.~ ~j~ lii~ .~I' ~. ~ hs i~H ~ill . 12/12/2007 1161 tfI* A 9 December 12, 2007 Prepared by: Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Tessie Sillery, Operations Coordinator, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes FOREST LAKES MSTU Proiect Status (F-36) . ACTIVE ( POC: Tessie Sillery) - Stripping & rellectors within all roads in boundary map 10-10-07: Committee requested for all the roads within the MSTU be stripped and rellector be placed. 10-26-07: Requested quote from Bonness. 11-9-07: Received Quote from Bonness - under review with Chris Tillman - Malcom's office 11-14-07: committee approved Quote - $ 42,663.93 - Bonness 11-20-07: WO in progress - for signatures 12-10-07: WO & PO - NTP pending to be sent out. 12-12-07: Notice to Proceed sent to Bonness for project. Bonness will schedule for start work within the week of Dec. 12th (F-37) - ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richard, Chris Iilman (Malcolm Pirinc) -BOND ISSUE PROJECTS- INDIVIDUAL PROJECT TRACKING: 12-12-07: Individual projects added to project manager list for tracking of each preject. Project Description Start/End No. 01 Install gravity storm sewer from PS to Gordon River' 02 Forest Lakes Blvd. relief sewer to Lake 10' 03 Quail Forest Blvd. North Entrance regrading and paving' 04 Regrade Swale NO.6. Total regrade length approximately 1,500 L.F* 05 Regrade Swale No.1. Total regrade length approximately 1,250 L.F* 06 Regrade Swale NO.3. Total regrade length approximately 300 L.F* 07 Regrade Swale No.4. Total regrade length approximately 570 L.F.' 08 Regrade Swale No. 12. Total regrade length approximately 2,700 L.F* 09 Regrade Swale No. 13. Total regrade length approximately 700 L.F.' 10 Regrade Swale Nos. 14a and 14b adjacent to Emerald Greens. Total regrade length approximately 2,800 L.F.' II Regrade Swale No. 11. Total regrade length approximately 1,500 L.F.' 12 Regrade Swale NO.9. Total regrade length approximately 600 L.F.' 13 Regrade Swale No.8. Total regrade length approximately 1,100 L.F* 14 Single Family Area - Side Yard Swale RegradelRoad Cross Drains' 15 New Storm Sewer Outfall at Fairways at Emerald Greens' 16 Overlay Forest Lakes Blvd. and cul-de-sacs throughout Single Family Area' 17 Rebuild Woodshire Lane from Pine Ridge Road to Single Family Area' 18 Overlay Quail Forest Blvd. from GC Clubhouse to southern end' 19 Overlay Forest Lakes Drive and side streets from Forest Lakes Blvd. to south end' Note: 'indicates cost based on previous estimate from WilsonMiller (F-34) - ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richard, Chris Tilman (Malcolm Pirine) -- Swale Project Scope Defmitions; 6-13-07: Meeting with Malcolm Pirine to review base map of swales and lakes as per Bond Issue Project List. Map requires some minor modification. Scope of Swale projects will be derived from Base Map. 1 12/12/2007 161 i~i '. Ii 9 SCHEDULE: Fo.,... Llkesr.usTU: Swale Sc:ope o.fl~!tIO.,. ~ p~ PHASE__"....~ CONST. Overlay Rrojects 16& 17 61151()H/1~Q7.p~OJEeT Q9MPLETE Doeument Prep.. Sw;;lle Projects 7/11Q1-1/3OJ08i.1~ PROGRESS (50% COmplete) NTP Survey - RWA 1111412007 60 Day Survey 11114107-1113/08 Survey Comp/etll 1113!2008 Golf Clu.b80;;lrd Meeting-approval 2I1~1! BCC Approval~nts . 31251?OO8 acC Ap~I.Cl,lntrllctor BIds 312~8 Begin Swafe Projects 4/112008 90 Day conlllrUction 411120Q8.6130J08 SwaJe Construction Complete 613012008 (F-31) - ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richard).Easement for Swales & Lakes 3-29-07: RLS sent to Scott Teach for recommendation regarding request as per Macolm Pirine advisement that easement may be the option the MSTU would want to pursue for swales and lakes. Also included in request is evaluation of roadways in terms of easements. 4-30-07: RLS received from Scott Teach regarding obtaining easement within Golf Course Property. Recommendation is to proceed with obtaining easement within Golf Course for both swales and lakes. Easement is not required for roadways as per RLS. 5-9-07: Meeting with Kevin Hendricks regarding easements. Kevin will work directly with Chris Tilman (Consultant) and Liaison Project Manager Darryl Richard in obtaining any required easement/Right of Enlly. Recommendation from Kevin was to pursue negotiation with Golf Course based on a 'preliminary' map (to be produced by Malcolm Pirine) of the easement areas. 7-6-07: Meeting with Golf Course - review of easements - Chris - Malcom Pernie will be sending out a report of the results of meeting. 7-23-07: July 16"', draft document received from Malcom Pernie & County staff reviewing with Consultant - Presentation per Quail Run Golf Course 8-15-07: (week of) Malcolm Pirine coordinating project details with Quail Run Club Mgmt. 8-22-07: RWA will be perfonning Survey - quote from RWA pending regarding the Golf Course approval. 9-10-07: Obtaining scope of service from RW A - (RWA to create scope) 9-12-07: RWA has provided draft scope - under review by Malcolm Pirine 10-17-07: Purchasing requested changes in Scope hunp sum vs time & material and other verbage. 10-22-07: RWA has provided proposal - county staff to review and requested revisions. 11-6-07: RW A has revised proposal several times per request of county staff. Still pending on revision 11-8-07: RWA responded and Work Order is with Budget Analyst going through signature process. 11-20-07: NTP sent on 11-20-07 - 60 days - $58,305.50 to be completed by January 19'h, 2008. (F26) - ON GOING-ACTIVE (POC Tessie SilIery) - Signage Maintainance 11-08-06: Fogg moved to utilize annual contractor - maximum $] 0,000.00 1-29-07: Requested estimate. 2-14-07: PO for annual maintenance in amount 01.$10,000.00 requested. 3-13-07: PO emailed to Lykins for ongoing maintenance 9-30-07: PO closed for end oftiscal year. 10-10 -07: Requested estimate. 10-20-07: Estimate came in at $5,000.00 11-06-07: Request for PO in process 10-10-07: Received PO for $5,000 and NTP went out. 2 12/12/2007 16 I f1 9 (F-25) - ON GOING-ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richard) - Pot Hole Repairs 11-08-06: Fogg moved to increase funds for pot hole repair up to $40,000.00 12-13-06: Work Order in Progress 1-10-07: Bonness NTP - $40,000 1-23-07: Bonness - will be marking pot holes. 2-05-07: Bonness marked and in process of repairing pot holes 2-12-07: Bonness repaired pot-holes. Marked areas filled with asphalt. Villas turn area remains for future project. 4-13-07: Villas area has been completed, some minor pot-holes are forming in other areas. Bonness called to perform inspection/repair under current PO. 10-24-07: New Fiscal Vear 07-08 - Bonness - $ 11,491.61 11-6-07: Work Order in process. - pending signatures 11-20-07: Work Order rejected by Newman for minutes backup. 12-10-07: Need to have committee approve the amount for the Work Order - $11,491.61 (F-23) ON GOING-ACTIVE (POC: Darryl Richardl-Desiltation of Culverts; includes telescope inspection within Forest Lakes; MSTU Committee vote to obtain annual services from Shenandoah Construction based on annual contract not to exceed $30,000.00 per year. Project Manager to confinn scope of work with contractor prior to each service. 10-11-06: Committee approves $30,000 for annual contract with Shenandoah. 11-7-06: Increase to PO ($3, 155.70) 1-25-07: Requested for Estimate for annual maintenance not to exceed $26,800.00 3-13-07: NTP - sent to Shanendoah 3-15-07: Shenandoah contacted to de-silt Woodshire Ditch. 4-12-07: Meeting with Mike of Shenandoah for direction in specific project areas within Forest Lakes for desilting. Areas include: Villas near Lake 6; Pipes near Lake 8 including 4 inch outfall and 24 inch; Pipes near Lake 13 and Lake 10. Completion by 5/12/07. 4-27-07: Shenandoah completed items near Lake #6 and Villas from 4-12-07 meeting. 5-8-07: All Items noted on 4-12-07 are completed. Ongoing maintenance as per future request. 5-8-07: Committee requested Darryl to work with company - not following what they requested 5-23-07: Darryl met with company regarding dumping in area. - issue resolved 10-24-07: Purchasing going to BCC for approval of new contractors for annuals. 11-6-07: Pending new bid tab and bcc approval. 11-14-07: Spoke with purchasing and this item will not be bid out as of yet - still working on bid process. Purchasing advised to get three quotes for now. (F-16) -ON GOING-ACTIVE (pOC: Tessie Slllery)-Exotic Removal- Woodshire Ditch -Lake Doctors Annual Maintenance Contract - Woodshire Ditch & pump station - Notice to proceed ITEM 5, 2005 - $4,770.00 - Annually 5-15-05 - Purchasing required Re-Bid (quote) for project - Quotes due 5-26-06 5-30-06 - Annual Contractor Aquagenix (George Bowling) to provide quote based on annual contract- pending 6-12-06 - PO requested waiting on Gloria 6-27-06 - PO issued and ongoing 4-4-07: New Quote received from Lake Doctors for $4,740.00 4-13-07: Quote received from Aquagenics (George Bowling) at $6,180.00; No Quote received from Aquatic Systems. Lake Doctors is the apparent low at $4,740.00 5-7-07: NTP - Lake Doctors - $4,740.00 9-30-07: PO Closed end of Fiscal Vear 10-12-07: New Fiscal Vear 07-08 - NTP $ 5, 640.00 3 12/12/2007 16" A (F-15) ONGOING-ACTIVE (POC: Tessie Sillery) - Mowing - Woodshire Drive - Landscape Maintenance Contract - 400 ft. x 20 ft. Sod Mowing. Quotes requested from annual contractors. 4-17-06; Southern Services under contract for maintenance on annual basis based on contract rates. 3-16-07: Southern Services Contacted to mow up to Forest Lakes Blvd. 5-10-07: Southern Services PO increased by $ 3, 340.00 till end ofFV. 9-30-07: End of Fiscal year - po's closed 10-12-07: New Fiscal Vear 07-08 -NTP issued (F-29) - COMPLETED (POC: Darryl Richard) -Bond Issue Finance Package 12-11-06: Meeting with Mike Smykowski, Office of Business Management & Budget, Director. 12-13-06: Requested project information sent to Mike Smykowski for submittal to PFM (Financial Consultant). 12-13-06: Package sent to PFM for review. 1-10-7: Mike Smykowski reports that there will be a Budget Meeting on 1-11-07. During Budget meeting there will be a review of the Forest Lakes Bond Issue. PFM or another option (Loan with a Bank) will be recommended to finance bond issue. Alternative funding through a Bank will be reviewed. 1-17-07: Meeting with Chairman & staff to discuss priority project list and fmance items 2-14-07: Bond Issue funds are anticipated to be available after April I, 2007. Committee request to see break-down of Cost for bond issue for next meeting. 3-14-07: PFM will be attending the meeting 3-23-07: PFM sends "Schedule" for bond issue. Staff confirms project list and schedule. Funds are due to be released in June 2007. 5-9-07: Revised release of funds date is July 2007 as per PFM correspondence. 7-9-07: Kelly - PFM emailed a schedule regarding bond. 7-18-07: Kelly - PFM emailed a new schedule - draft debt service schedules showing coverage on the allocated millage and a revised Plan of Finance detailing the tax reform issue. 9-10-07: Budget Dept. - Novus Exec. Summary - regarding bonding for forest lakes: Below see exec. Summary title: 9-11-07 bee meeting This item to be heard on or about 11 :00 a.m. A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collisr County, Florida, acting as the Governing Body of Collier County I Florida and the Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage Municipal Service Taxing Unit, authorizing the issuance of not exceeding $6,250,000 in aggregate principal amount of Collier County, Florida Limited General Obligation Bonds (Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage Municipal Service Taxing Unit), Series 2007, to finance the costs of certain roadway lighting, roadway-related drainage and roadway restoration within the Forest Lakes MSTU and to pay certain costs and expenses Incurred with the issuance of the Series 2007 Bonds; Providing for the payment of said Bonds from ad valorem taxation levied in an amount which shall not exceed four mills on all taxable property within the boundaries of the MSTU; Making certain covenants and agreements in connection therewith; Providing for the rights of the holders of such bonds; authorizing the awarding of said Series 2007 Bonds pursuant to a public bid; Delegating certain authority to the Chair for the award of the Series 2007 Bonds and the approval of the terms and details of said Series 2007 Bonds; Authorizing the publication of a notice of sale for the Series 2007 Bonds or a summary thereof; Appointing the paying agent and registrar for said Series 2007 Bonds; Authorizing the distribution of a preliminary official statement and the execution and delivery of an official statement with respect to the Series 2007 Bonds; Authorizing the execution and delivery of a continuing disclosure certificate with respect to the Series 2007 Bonds; Authorizing municipal bond insurance for the Series 2007 Bonds; and providing an effective date. (Mike Smykowskl, Director, OffIce of Management and Budget) 1O~1-07; Funds were transferred into the MSTU Fund. -10-07: FYI: Rec'de an email from Russell Edghill Consultant, Public Financial Management, Inc. 300 South Orange Ave. Suite 1170, Orlando, FL 32801 IPI 407.648.2208 and IF) 407.648.1323 edghillr@pfm.comCollierCounty(FL)Limited GO Bonds (Forest LakesRoadway and Drainage MSTU), Series 2007 - Closed transaction on this date: 4 12/12/2007 lSfrJ A 9 (F-30) - COMPLETED - (pOC: Tessie Sillery) - 0 & E Report for Woodshire Lane Project is to detennine responsibility for Tree Trimming - Woodshire Lane (Includes: ROW Survey and 0 & E Report on ownership at comers intersection of Woodshire Lane @ Pine Ridge Road) 03-09-07: Met in field with George Fogg - reviewed project - questions were raised in regards to which trees need trimming. 03-09-07: After meeting in field -landscaping was notified of committess concerns - to trim hedge & remove pahn tree for obstruction of oncoming cars. 03-13-07: Project to be discussed at meeting - Who owns the comer of Woodshire & Pine Ridge? 03-22-07: Staff requires survey indicating location of trees prior to issue of Work Order/Purchase Order to trim trees. Detennination of ROW needs to be made through survey. 04-11-07: MSTU Committee approves not to exceed $6,000.00 for ownership and encumberance report and survey for the Woodshire Lane from Forest Lakes Blvd. to Pine Ridge Road. 5-11-7 : Confinnation for ownership and encumberance report cost from Executive Title in the amount of $90.00; Request for Purchase Order submitted. PO issue is pending. Quotes for survey from annual consultant is for $2,500.00 from ABB Engineering. - Thes two companies are not annuals - denied quotes 5-23-07: PO Request in process - waiting on a PO - $750.00 5-30-07: NTP - 30 days 6-30-07: Received All three 0 & E's on all three locations requested (F-35) - COMPLETED - (POC: Darryl Richard) Survey for Woodshire lane up to Forest lakes blvd. 5-15-07: Requested for quote from RW A 5-23-07: Processing WO with Contractor 6-20-07: NTP - with completion date of August 17,2007 7-23-07: Benchmark delays - Danyl provided RW A with platt map to better defme benchmarks. 8-17-07: survey completed. (F-32) -{:OMPLETF: (POC: Darryl Richard) Overlay Project #1 - Bond Issue Project List SCHEDULE: Forest Lakes MSTU: Overlay Project No. One 3-13-07: Scope of overlay project rec'd from malcome pernie 4-10-07: Quotes for Overlay Project # I have been reviewed. Contractors have been requested to confmn unit cost for quote. 4-16-07: Final Quotes for Overlay Project #1 have been received. Bonness is the apparent low quote at $189,495.79; other quotes: Quality at $197,552.50, Better Roads at $196,829.00; Committee has already approved not to exceed $310,000 for project at March 14,2007 meeting. 4-27-07: Approval of Work Order pending. Work Order Issue will be for 30 day time-line. 5-23-07: NTP - 5-14-07 - Bonness 6-13-07: Contractor to start project on 6-18-07 with 2 week construction 6-27-07: Completed (F-20) COMI'Un (POC: Darryl Richard) - Gravity Flow System: Proposal for Design Phase 9-12-06: Need Scope of Services from Consultant. 9-13-06: MSTU Committee approves 'Not to exceed' for $90,000.00 for the project 9-25-06: Scope of Services received from WilsonMiller exceeds the $90,000.00 limit. WilsonMiller to revise scope. 10-11-06: Committee approves not to exceed $120,000 for Wilson Miller Scope of Services. 12-6-06: Committee notified that Notice to Proceed will not be sent to WilsonMiller until review of proposal by Staff and Malcom Pirine has been completed. 1-17 -07 : pending Malcom Pirine to review 2-6-07: Upon Consultant review and staff review NTP sent to WilsonMiller for project. 3-13-07: Wilson Miller locating existing utilities for project 4-5-07: Stop Work Issued for Gravity Flow System Project. Project is under review by Malcolm Pirine, Collier County Stonnwater Department (Oversight-In House), and Department of Alternative Trans. Modes. 5 12/12/2007 ., ,J.. · "". A 9 7-1-07: Project cancelled as per committee request. (F-27) -COMPLETE (pOC Tessie Sil1e!)') - Engineer study - turn on Woodshire 12-05-06: Documentation sent to Traffic Operations for review of proposed installation. Meeting with Bob Tipton, Director, Traffic Operations. 1-) 0-07: Bob Tipton confirms that installation is not approved, 1-17-07: As per discussion with Bob Tipton, Traffic Operations will review in terms of 'SDP' for Publix ~opping center and report back to A TM Staff, 1-13-07: Discussion with Bob Tipton regarding determination of approval for "No Left Turn" sign. 2-22-07: No Left Turn Sign Installed by Traffic Operations through Bob Tipton 3-8-07: Traffic Ops Director - reviewing PUD - The sign installed by traffic ops is only tempofmy till further review is done (F-28) - COMPLETE (POC Darryl Richard) - Malcom Pirine Project Management Oversight Services- Committee approve $40,000.00 for annual services. 12-06-06: Committee approved the funding for Malcolm Pirine Contract 12-19-06: Malcolm Pirine delivers Fee Matrix for proposal 12-20-06: Staff request revised Scope of Services for proposal to match Fee Matrix. 12-22-06: Malcolm Pirine revised Fee Matrix received. 1-08-07: Work Order picked up by Malcolm Pirine for signature. 1-17-07' Work Order in system for signatures; Nann Feder has signed; Release from Purchasing Pending 1-19-07: Work Order rejected by pun;hasing - due to Consultant not using fixed fees. 1-23-07: New Proposal received from Consultant 1~25-07: Work Order Ready for Pickup by Consultant 1-26-07: Consultant Picked up WOo 2-08-07: WO went through signature approval and pending purchasing approval & PO release 2-9-07: Notice to Proceed for Malcolm Pirhe sent (F-17) - COMPI ./.Tl: - Wilson Miller - Annual Consulting Services - WilsonMiller- Scope of Services received for $30,000.00 from WilsonMiller; Requires Comnittee Approval. Committee approved $30,000.00 - Work Order issued January 23, 2006 8-21-06 - Ongoing 1-17-06: Reciept offmal invoice trom WilsonMiller pendhg, following final invoice PO will be closed. (F-13) - COMPI.f:'rl': - BOND Resolution & Execltive Summary - Coordination with Scott Teach based on WilsonMiIler cost estimate. 6-12~06: Scott teach met with Smykowsky & will be working with Finance Board, 6-27-06: Meeting scheduled for 6-28-06 7-18-06: BCC to approve on 7-25-06 - Resolution to put on election ballot for bond issue 8-7-06: Scott Teach reports ballot will be by ~tail and not by actual vote on Nov. 7, 2006-As per Jennifer Edwards Spvr of Elections. 8-21-06: Tessie Uploaded new resolution superseding 2006-201 - consent agenda -bec 9~12-06 9-12-06: BCC Approved Booo Resulution. Approval by voters on NO\ember 7, 2006 required. 11-08-06: Confirmation tram Scott Teach that Bond Issue has been approved by Voters (F-24) -(XlMPLETED - Two Staff Gauges 11-08-06' Fogg moved to install the staff gauges. 12-04-06: Issue of Purchase Order pending for Work Order 12-13-06: NTP - Work Order-$1,200.00 (90 days) 2-14-07: Committee consensus is to cancel this contract StafIconcurs with recommendation, PO will be c<r1celled. (F-17) - COMPIElT:: ~ Water Flow Data Loggers (and related request for verification of water levels throughOlt the Forest Lakes CommWlity) 7-22-03: Purchase Order for $6,000.00 Project Cost ($2,000.00 installation and $4,000.00 material) issued to WilsonMiller for instaJlation of water-level recorders. 3.3-06: Gordon River Outflow Meeting with: Clarerce Tears, SFWMD; Eugene Calvert, Director Stormwater Dept.;Jerry Kurtz, Stormwater Dep!.; Darryl Rictmd, MSTU Project Manager; and Craig Pajer, Consultant, Wilsontv1i.Iler. Clarence Tears :tates in meeting that if the Forest Lakes MSTU can provide data that the lowering of the Gordon River Oltflow Weir Structure (to allow foc better flow of water from MSTU) is justifiable that the SFWMD would consider such a proposal to lower the outflow level at the weir structure. 3-6-06: Request sent to WilsonMiller (Criag Pajer) to veritY the operational status of the water Level recorders. 3-30-06: Request sent to WilsonMiller for verification related to the warranty of the recorders and location and operation of the recorders, 5-11-06: Staff Project Manager Darryl Richard request all data related to the installed recorders and status of the recorders and data obtained, 6-2-06: WilsonMiller Project Manager Craig Pajer delivers electronic files containing data recorded. A report indicating the significance ofthe data was not provided by WilsonMiller. There has not been any documert produced by consultant analyzing aMlor summarizing the data collected, 8-9-06: Committee Voted to wthorize $15,000.00 for the purchase of new (water level) flow meters for Forest Lakes MSTU, 6 12/1212007 161 r, " 9 8~21-06: Staff research online indicates that there are a variety ofprodl.l:ts available and consultation with Stonnwater Department indicates that there are products which SFWMD prefers for use in this application. 8-29-06: Stonnwater Project lvfanager Jeny Kurtz meets with MSTU Project Manager to review the proposal, Jerry recommends contact with Tim Howard ofSFWMD to detennine which product best suits the needs afForest Lakes MSTU. 9-1-06: Phone consult with Tim Howard indicates that the method for obtaining 'verifiable' dcta which is 'defensible' is utilizing a product that both records the data and automatically sends it for processing. Estimated cost of product and installation of such a system is $40,000.00. Vendors were reviewed for type of product offered: Campbell Scientitic; Hydro lab Prowcts; and YSI Products. Engineering Consultation was recommended from County Stormwater Dept. and from SFWMD for installatirn and continuous monitor of system an1 data collected. The possibility of tie into the existing SFWMD data base collection systemwas mentioned (F-19) - COMPI.FTE - Asphalt Repair (3 mobilizations) Pot hole repair and other ($25,000) 8-18-06 - Bonnes to pick up WO 8-21-06 - waiting on bonnes signature 8-22.06: Bonness signed WO; issue of PO pending. 8-31-06: PO sentto Bonness; 9-19-06: Bonnes confirms that repair areas are marked and areas are approved by Project rvtanager. 10-18-06: Bonness crews are onsite lmking repairs to pot-holes (1st mobilization). On Monday 10/23/06 Bonness will re-mobilize for additional repairs. 10-31-06: Bonness Paver repairs completed. (F-22) COMPLETE - Obtaining Additional Scope of Services for Annual Consultant; at the request of Committee Chairman and A TM Department Director Liason Staff is obtaining alternate Scope of Services from Collier Coulty Annual Vendor List and other private sector Engineering Firms. 10-5-06: Request for Scope of Services sent to annual vendors on Engineering Ammal Contract. 11-7-06: List of Firms submitting quote recorded. Staffrecommeros Special Meeting for reviC\.V of proposals. (F-24) COMPLETF - MSTU Committee directs staff to meet with SFWMD concening the installation of water level recorders. Meeting is to have Oept. Director Diane Flagg, Project Mananger Darryl Richard, Consultant Craig Pajer, Clearance Tears SFWMD, Eugene Calvert, Oir. Stormwater Dept, and one representative from Forest Lakes MSTU Committee (recommended was Chairman Bob Jones). 10-12-06: Committee directs staff to set up meeting and obtain services from Mancan for minutes. 10-25-06: SFWMD recommends installation of staff gauges, WilsonMiller to provide quote for installations; In reversal of previous recommendation - installation of electronic recording devices is not recommended and determined to be un-necessary. (F-2Ib}- COMPl.l-'TE Shenandoah Construction - Quail Forest Blvd. Desilting (includes surrounding areas within Forest Lakes MSTU) 9.13-06: Forest Lakes MSTU Committee approved project for Shenandoah Construction based on Annual Contract rates. 10-10-06: Shenandoah Construction submits quote based on $15,000.00 amount with invoicing to be as per completion of each section based on contract rates. Project is complete invoicing is pending. Shendoah invoiced for $13,718.25 (F-2Ia}- ,~'OMPIJ:TJ-.: .Shenandoah ConstnJl..1ion - Woodshire Ditch. Oesilting Project 8-9-06 - Committee voted on an up to $15,000 to get clearing and restoring the drainage swale at woodshire dtch (east to west portion. 8.21-06 - Pending Quote from Shenandoah - annual 8-31-06: PO sent to Shenandoah for project. 9-12-06: Project 80% complete 9-15-06: Project 100% complete. (F-14) CANCELLED - Woodshire Lane - Re-grading/Cutting of ROW Edge & Sod Installation 8.9.06 - Committee approved up to limit - pending Quotes coming in. 8-21-06 - WO # assigned and to be picked up by Bonness (4,962.64) 9.1-06: WO returned from Bonness and forwarded to GI(t'ia Herrera for review/Sharon then to Norm Feder 9-12-06: Need approval for $4,962.64 for project. 9-13-06: Committee selected not to approve necessary funding for project. (F-12) COMPLETE - Committee member Roger SommelVille reI. to Swale #15 and nearby Lake; Liason StatrProject Manager and Consultant to review project to determine any outstanding items and also the level of the Lake in relatioo to the swale level. 8.31-06: WilsonMiller Craig Pljer reports site inspected and no problems or punch list items. Victor (Engineering Tech) perfonned inspection. 9-7.06: StatrProject Manager meeting with Craig Pajer confirms WilsonMiller inspection finding no outstanding punch-list items. (F-II) - COMPLETE-Mail out for Bond Issue Referendum 8-9-06: George Fogg moved to food a mailing to registered voters inorder to explain the ballot, this will be done by staff. 8-21.06: Staff will coordimte with Committee Chairman Bob Jones for content of mail-out. Man Can will provide !he assistance for mailing. 9-13-06: MSTU Committee 9-12-06: County Attorney Scott Teach lIld Committee Chainnan sign off on mailing. 9-19-06: Mancan services sent oot mailing. 7 12/12/2007 6 ~ :#: { !lO'''~ (F-IO) . COMPLETE - Pump System Repair - Emergency repair afForest Lakes Pump System on 7/28/06. 7-28-06: Florida Irrigation Supply (FIS) repairs pump system for Forest Lakes as an emergency call for $600.00. &-02-06: Purchase Order issued to FIS for repair cost Invoicing is to Forest Lakes MSTU. 8-10-06: FIS invoice for $800.00 exceeds quote. Staff request FIS to fe-invoice for correct amOlD1t. (F-9) - ('OMPLETE - Lake # 6- Villas Drainage Improvement - Craig Pager- County Attorneys - To determine if the project scope is within the authorization of the MSTU Ordinance. 8-23-06: RLS sent to Scott Teach for determination of weather the scope of proposed project is authorized by Fcrest Lakes MSTU Ordinance. 9-1-06: Liaison Staff receives notification trom Scott Teach that the scope goes beyond what is authorized by Forest Lakes MSTU Ordinance. Project is not authorized by Forest Lakes MSTU Ordinance as it is not 'roadway related drainage'. (F-8) COMPLET1:: - Roadway Signage and Pavement Marking Study- Installation of Signs - COMPLETED - Committee approved for signage-committee chainnan has requested that consultant review and revise the quantity of signs. 4-17-06; PO issued to Lykins for $12,045.00; Lykins begins work on 4-17-06. 5-15.06 - NTP given- project under construction - estimated to be done 5-20-06 5-24-06-Project Complete-need to have tinal walk-through. 7-18-06 - FrNAL INSPECTION - PROJECT COMPLETE (F-7) COMPLETE -. Painting of Markings .Quotes requested from new Collier County AnnualContractor Trutwin (Fort Myers Location). 5-30-06; Quote from Trutwin based on annual contract for traffic markings pending 6-12-06: Trutwini requested new drawings with textthat is legable from Wilson Miller.- no drawings reced. 6-27-06: Submitted PO request on 6-27-06 7-12 -06 : Project completed (F-6) -COMPLETE- New Committee member selected Mr. Fogg -BCC Approved on 9/13/05 Complete; sec Approved Fogg, (F-5) COMPI.FTE - SWALE #15 - Kyle Construction 100% complete - need consultant report on final inspection. 4-17-06; Need WilsonMiller notifiQltion of Final Inspeciton. 6/12/06 - Project complete - waiting on WM to submit letter of final completion. 627.06 - Project complete - waiting on WM to submit letter of final completion. 7-12-06 - Craig Pager to meet with Drrryl- final completion documentation 8-7-06: Substantial Completion with Punch-list complete (F-4) - (:OMPI En: .Swale # 7 & 10 Regrade; WM has completed design. WM completing Bidding with Annuals. 4-17-06; Wark Order for Higgins pending 5-15-06, NTP - 5-8-06 - DN Higgins - Wilson Miler perfanning constIDction observatirn 6-12-06, Construction Reports from Wilson, MiIler- Pending (50% completed) 6-27-06: Waiting on report from Wilson Miler 7-12-06 - Craig Pager to meet with Dtrryl- tinal completion documentation 8-7-06: Substantial Completion with Punch-list complete (F 3) - l 'OM PI .FTE - Swale # 2 Regrade;m WM has completed design WM completing Bidding with Annuals. 4-17-06; Work Order for Higgins pending 5-15-06, NTP - 5-8-06 - DN Higgins - Wilson Miler perfonning constIDction observatirn. 6-12-06 Completed- need report frcm Wilson Miller 6-27-06 Completed- need report from Wilson Miller 7-12-06 - Craig Pager to meet with Drrryl- final completion docwnentation 8-7-06: Final Completion Document Executed (F-2) - COMPLLTF - Woodshire Lane Overl~ Project- 1" Overlay of Woods hire Lane. Commttee Approved $48,000.00 for this project. 5~15-06 - Work Order- picked up by Contractor- waiting tor signature. -Contractor schedule - Mid June to begin. 5-30-06 ; Construction to begin on 5-31-06 field meeting to held. 6-27 -06: Completed- and final inspection requested. 7-12-06 - Craig Pager to meet with Dmyl- final completion docwnentation 8~ 7-06: Final Completioo Docwnent Executed. (F-I) CnMPL.UT - Pump Generator- 8-9-06 - Committee voted to rent a generator if its needed in an emergency 8 02/04/2008 21:14 2394559556 GGCC 16/A'i 0 PAGE 01. .1 1""""'Y7,2008 MINUlES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER '\~' \A___ ADVISORY COMMITTEE Fiala ---;-:- Halas <n.c..---~_ ~~~~ng~_ Coletta ~-_.__. Naples, Florida, January 7,2008 RECEIVED FEB 0 5 2008 Board Of CC~lJnty C(;lllmis~.ioners LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 6:00 PM in REGULAR SESSION in Conference Room "e" of the Golden Gate Community Center, 4701 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Bill Arthur VICE CHAIR: Jim KIug Ernie Bretzmann Vicki Clavelo Kaydee Tuff ALSO PRESENT: Ellen R. Barkin, Community Center SUpervisor Shari Ferguson, Region IT Manager 1 Mise vorres" Date:.1W.-tiln- Item#: ~ ':JI:~;1 to / 02/04/2008 21:14 2394559556 GGCC 16 I Nt O. PAGE .~ 1anuary 1. 2008 A. Call to OnIer The Meeting was caJled to order at 6:05 PM by Chairman Bill Arthur. B. AQDrcw..1 of ARend. K4ydee Tuff moved to /#Pp- the ApnJo. Second by Jim Klug. CIlI7'Ied ullaninunl,ly, 5-9. C. Aooroval of Medinll Minutes Jim K1ug requested a change to Item m on page 2. The last sentence in the pa1lIgI'aph will end at the word, "application." Kay4ee Tuff moved to appruve tlu M",uta l!ftlle DecMrkr :I, 2007 meetiIfg tl$ amended. &collll by VICki am.elo. C8rried 1IIIIIIIimou$ly, 4-0. Ernie ~ ablttdtle4 from VOIiIIg tRllce he did IJOt IIIte1ul the December meeti1Jg. D. Old Business 1) Kitchen Rood Update Ellen Barkin stated work on the kitchen hood was in progress with only the "finish work"to be completed. Chairman Arthur stated he WIIS ll'q)ecting a telephone call from the installers of the fire !lllJlP<<lSsion system with the date that the system would be ill8ta1led and would provide the information to Ellen Barkin E. New Buu_ 1) Eleetiou 0(1008 Offirers Clr.aJnwu. ArlIuIr IWIffiIurtd Jim Kl#g tl$ Chairman for tlte 2008 term. &collll by Kaydee Tuff. Jim KIug accepted the nomination with the understanding that he lIlay be traveling during the summer months. C8rried IIl1tlnillwluly, 4-0. Kaydee Tuff aombuded E1'Ifie Bretutuuut 4$ Vrce CIuIir. Second by VICki UIlveIo. Ernie Bretzmann accepted the nomination and verified that the term would begin with next month's meeting and nm fur the full calendar year. C8rried lIIIIlni_ly, 4-0. Chairman Arthur stated he sent an ema.il to the BCC to lIUggest changing the members' terms from two-year to staggered 3-year terms and to add an altemate. When he receives a response, he will forward it to the new Chair. ElIea Barkin stated she would fotward the names of the new Chair and Vice Chair to the BCC for approval. 2) Supervilor ffigblighu - Oftemher/Sanuary Programs and Events · BMX races - December 7'" and 14'" - with a total of 50 participants · "Walk of Trees" - December 8'" through IS'" 2 02/04/2008 21:14 2394559556 GGCC 16 I A .f 0 PAGE ...j/ IllIIblllY 7, 2008 · Trolley rides - December 15111 - approximately 250 people attended _ Ellen stated she is considering including trolley rides as part oflarger event for next year which would allow her to charge a small fee for the rides to off-set the costs Shari Ferguson said the County has requested each supervisor to review their department's programs and to compano the revCllUe earned with aSllOciated expenses; d~isions will be made as to which programs to continue, which to eliminate, and which to assess a charge. The goal is DOt to make money, but to be able to support the programs being offered. Those programs which produce a profit will offset those which do nor. · "Snow Fest" - December 1" Next year, it may not be "free." · "Country Jam" will be held at the County Fairgrotmds. Alcohol will be available. · Bridge Tournament - JanUlU1' 24lh · "Cool Cmisers Annual Car Show" -lllJ1U81'y 26"" Although it is not a GGCC event, the sponsor usually makes a large donation to the GGCC after this evem. · "Bike Fest" - February 9'" and 10'" · Camps were held over the Christmas holidays with 19 attendees F. MontbIY Bndtret Renort - EDen Barkin and Shari Fel'JDSOD The revenue is slightly less than last year's figures. It WllS noted that the Boys &Girls Club has negatively impacted attendance at GGCC, in addition to tile fact that several schools now run their own after-school care programs G. Members Addition. BOd Com......... Vidd aaveto asked if there was additional information concerning the Metro pes request regarding a cell tower. Shari Fergtl$On stated the Bec had requested a proposal from Metro PeS. She is waiting to hear how the revenue will be alloeated. Jim KIng suggested each member should present a two or three organizational goals at next month's meeting, mul he requested allowing approximately 30 minutes for discussion. R Inform".". Item. Ellen Barkin presented a tentative Meeting schedule for 2008. She requested cancellation of the 1une mlleting instead of the July mlleting due to contlict with the start of the SlImmer Camp program. Additionally, due to conflict with the Labor Day holiday. the September meeting will be held on September 2, 2008. Ernie Bretun4Jfn moved to CIUIcel the Jtme meeting and to hold the July meeting on July fA. &cotul by VICki OlIVeto. Carried UlUUUlIWllsly, 5.0. The next meeting II Mooday, Febm..,.. 4, 2008. 3 _._---------_.~-'..,.._-_.....,.~,. " 02/04/2008 21:14 2394559556 GGCC 16 I 4 ,: 0 PAGE 04 Janua.y 7, 2008 'fhere beiD, no fu.......r busID_ fOr the load oflhe County, the Meedna WIllI adjoumed by order of the CbainnlUl at ':30 PM. COLLIER COUNTY GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER ADVlSORY COMMI'ITEE ft{t:.~~ n- MiIIutes Mn appJ1Wed by the BoanllCommitree Chair 011 (;;1../ If/o 8' as p_~ V- . or IllI BlDUlded. r . . 4 ----~,_.._._,~-~... -~-~ 161 A 11 RECEIVED ,..-._- I-FH U /'-8 f L,;d October 17, 2007 8;30am Career and Seryice Center of Collier County-lmmokalee . ~ . hv/tF 750 South 5th Street Fiala P . " . . Halas -L.' ...- . . Immokalee, Flonda, 34142 H '. ~ y -. ennlnQ_ Coyle _. MINUTES Coletta _ _ ...'= _' Immokalee Master Plan and Visioning Committee P(1..'F-.~ ;.:: (-:::n,rUISSiQp.ers A. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Fred N. Thomas, Jr. at !OAOAM B. Roll Call and Announcement of a Ouorum Advisorv BoardlEZDA: Present: Fred Thomas, Richard Rice, Bob Soter, Ira Malamut, Denise Blanton, Eva Deyo, Julio Estremera, RickHeers, Bernado Barnhart, Carol Sykora, and Caption Tom Davis. Absent/Excused:, Ana Salazar, Robert Halman, and Floyd Crews. A quorum was announced as being present. Immokalee Master Plan and Visionine Committee: Present: Edward (Ski) Olesky, Fred N. Thomas, Jr., Richard Rice, Clarence A. Tears, Jr., and Rick Heers. Absent/Excused: William O'Neill, Leo F. Rogers, Raymond Holland, and Floyd Crews. A quorum was declared. Others Present: Robert Grassi, Robert Slate, Brooke Gabrielson, Penny Phillippi, Patrice Patterson, K.P. Pezeshkan, Jim Coletta, Tammie Nemecke, Susi Winchell, Essie Serrata, Jacqueline Toemmes, Gene Hearn, Corbett Alday, Bob Juster, Edward N. Finn and Thomas Greenwood of the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department staff. C. AdOPtion of Agenda. The agenda was approved unanimously upon motion by Mr. Heers and second by Mr. Olesky with the following agenda additions; item E3 under the IMPVC agenda an announcement to be made by Bob Juster of TMl building; Item G3 on the CRA agenda.. ..Brownfield Area designation; and Item F3 on the EZDA agenda.. ..Brownfield Area designation. D. Approyal of Minutes of the September 19 and 26, 2007 meetings The minutes of these meetings were approved as distributed by unanimous vote upon motion by Mr. Rice and second by Mr. Estremera. E. Communications (see communications folder at meeting) 1. Brian Goguen of Barron Collier Enterprises: Update on proposed Serenoa DRI. With Mr. Goguen having a conflict this morning, Mr. Thomas provided an update with no action taken. Mise Carres : to I k I ( Date: 'tem#:_ \/ 1 ~oie~ to 161 All 2. CRA 2008-01; Alexandra Sulecki of Conseryation Collier and Possible Purchase of the Pepper Ranch. This item was discussed by Ms. Sulecki stating that the owners have approached Conseryation Collier about the possible sale of the 2500 acre ranch to Conservation Collier. She stated that she wished to obtain the views and possible support from this group regarding this proposition. She stated that there are no plans for the site other than for the possible use for passive recreation (for about 215 acres) and keeping the enyironmentally sensitive lands in that state. The use of mitigation credits was discussed. After discussion, a motion was made by Mr. Rice and second by Mr. Heers that both the IMPVC and the CRA Adyisory Board direct the President to send letters to both Conservation Collier and to the Board of County Commissioners in support of this proposal and that mitigation credits by used somewhere in Collier County and that the proposed use of the credits be referred to the CRA Advisory Board for recommendation at a later date. The motion carried unanimously. 3. Announcement bv Mr. Juster of the TMI Building. Mr. Juster announced that a new national guard armory will locate in Immokalee and also use some of the space at the airport for the parking/storage of vehicles. The armory will serve the needs of 5 million residents within a 50 mile radius and provide for hurricane readiness as well. F. Old Business 3. CRA 2006-00; Update on Immokalee Area Master Plan Process/LDC Update Process Mr. Greenwood reported that the 4-person Comprehensive Planning Department review team is still reviewing the draft and he has not received any responses from the team, headed by David Weeks, for further consideration by the Advisory Board and the IMPVC. Mr. Thomas stated that he had a meeting with the head of the department and that he would likely be meeting again. 4. Review of IMPVC and CRA Advisory Board Attendance and Possible Recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. After review of attendance records during the past year, it was found that IMPVC members O'Neill and Rodgers missed more than half of the meetings and more than 2 meetings in a row and in violation of the attendance requirements outlined in Section 8 of Ordinance No. 2001-55. Upon a motion by Mr. Rice and second by Mr. Tears, the IMPVC unanimously directed the Chairman to notify the Board of County Commissioners that these two positions are declared yacant. G. New Business 1. CRA 2007-19: Development of a Capital Improvements Plan for the Immokalee Urban Designated Area to Assist With Implementation of the lAMP and Update of the Immokalee Component of the Community 2 161 All Redevelopment Plan. After discussion of the Scope of Services distributed with the agenda, the fact there would be 4 public meetings before the Capital Improvement Plan is completed, and that the priorities for capital improvements will be determined in Immokalee, a recommendation to the BCC authorize the preparation of a capital improvement plan using the proposed scope of services and Guardian Community Resources Management, Inc. (Guardian) was unanimously approved upon motion by Mr. Olesky and second by the Rice. Corbett Alday of Guardian was present to answer questions. H. Citizen Comments. None. r. Next Meeting Date The next meeting was set for November 14. J. Adiournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:45am. MINUTES Immokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board A. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 9:45am. B. Roll Call and Announcement of Ouorum Refer to joint meeting minutes above. C. Adoption of Agenda Refer to joint meeting minutes above. D. Approval of Minutes of the September 19 and 26, 2007 meetings. Refer to joint meeting minutes above. E. Communications (see communications folder at meeting) F. Old Business I. County Code Enforcement Monthly Highlights in Immokalee. Michelle Arnold, Director of the Code Enforcement Department, stated that there is a part-time supervisor for Immokalee (has both Golden Gate Estate and Immokalee) Carol Sykora, and 2 investigators. She stated that a new code enforcement software is being "rolled out" and will help in enforcement and that she would be happy to make sure that monthly reports are provided to the Advisory Board during its monthly meetings. Mr. Thomas stated that he would like to have reports which indicate symptoms of problems. No action was taken. 2. CRA 2006-10: Redevelopment of the Farmer's Market No action was taken. 3. CRA 2006-05; Status of SR 29 Bypass Proiect (Thursday, October 18, 5:30pm "Purpose and Need Scoping Public Meeting" at the One Stop Career and Service Center) Those present were encouraged to attend. 4. CRA 2006-12; East of 951 Infrastructure and Services Study (Monday, December 10 at tpm at Career and Service Center). Mr. Rice reported that the last meeting held earlier this month was largely attended by Golden Gate Estates property owners and covered fire and EMS services for the area. The meeting in Immokalee on December 10 will cover transportation issues. 5. CRA 2007-08; Set UP of Immokalee CRNEZDAlEDC/Chamber/Code Enforcement Office Set-Up 3 16 I A 11 -"', a. Budget Report (FY 07-08). Mr. Thomas requested payment of a bill from Fund 186 in the amount of $175 to the State of Florida for a service provided to the CRA. He stated the Bayshore CRA (Fund 187) has paid for the membership to the Florida Redevelopment Association which cost $475. Payment was authorized unanimously upon motion by Ms. Deyo and second by Ms. Blanton. b. Office Space Report. Report of Office Space Sub-committee (Dick Rice) Mr. Rice gaye a report about other office space (beyond that available for initial temporary use at 310 Alachua Street). After discussion, unanimous approval was giyen to county staff, in the interim, to proceed to expend the minimum necessary funds from Fund 186 to equip and furnish the CRA office space at 310 Alachua Street so that the Executive Director can commence work on December 3, following a motion by Mr. Rice and second by Mr. Estremera. c. Office Personnel Report. Executive Director Status and/or Administrative Assistant. A copy of the final draft Employment Agreement was distributed. It was stated that the new Executive Director would hired effective on December 3 and would be responsible for choosing and hiring the Administrative Assistant, upon the beginning of her tenure as Director. d. Miscellaneous. 6. Reports on CRNBCC actions taken on Recommendations of the Advisorv Board a. CRA 2007-10; Contracts with Guardian Community Resources Management, Inc. and Summit Professional Services, Inc. No report other than that they are in effect. 7. CRA 2007-05; New Proiects in the Immokalee Area · 2007-05(C): Tradeport DRI South of Airport. DRI application is being reviesed and meetings continue with expected start of construction in 2008 or 2009. . 2007-05(G); Family Dollar store (NW comer of Main at 2nd Street, East. No new report other than under review the second time. . 2007-05(H); Fiesta 3 (North Side of Boston between 2nd and 3'd Street). No report other than under review the second time. 8. CRA 2007-11; Progress and Course of Action Regarding Community Deyelopment Block Grant (FEMA) "Wilma Disaster Recoverv Program" Round 2 fundin~ in amount of $2.408,025 to assist Low and Moderate Income Housing with Wind Loss Mitigation Work (tentative plan is to provide $1 million for "rehablhardening" with emphasis for use in the 2 eRAs) Mr. Heers reported that the funding would be first offered to those approved preyiously (much of funds are already earmarked for Immokalee) and any balance would be offered to new applicants. 4 16/ A , 1 - G. New Business 1. CRA 2007-15; Discussion of Draft Collier Countv Economic Incentive Policy Collier Countv Redevelopment Areas This item was discussed in conjunction with the next agenda item with the following consensus; · The Immokalee CRA wishes to be a part of the workshop on January 25, 2008; · The Economic Incentiye Policy could be part of the workshop discussion; · The Immokalee CRA would like to have goal/objective setting workshop with the new Executive Director prior to the January 25 workshop to develop a basic set of goals and objectiyes for the fiscal year. 2 CRA Workshop. Discussion of Bayshore/Gateway CRA workshop with the Community Redevelopment Agency to review its work program for FY 2007-2008 (information only....January 25, 10;30 to 12:00 in Administration Building). See above. 3. CRA 2008-02; Robert Slate with Strategic Svstems. Inc. on Behalf of the Carlisle Development Group: Request Designation of Brownfield Area of the Crestview. Phases I and 2. Those present heard from Mr. Slate, stating that the proposed brownfield area is located in the CRA boundary and the enterprise zone boundary and the designation of the area by the county as a brownfield area would qualify the owner, the Carlisle Development Group, for reimbursement of sales taxes on construction materials. Copies of the site plan for Crestview Phases I and 2 were reviewed along with a draft Executive Summary and Resolution for the BCC to consider. It was pointed out that the County attorney has: · directed that a public hearing be held in Immokalee to consider this resolution and that the owners of property within 500 feet of the area be notified as well a notice in the newspaper; · that a Brownfield review committee be established (it could be the existing CRA Advisory Board). Mr. Slate also pointed to other areas, such as Jacksonville and Miami, that have designated their entire Enterprise Zone as a Brownfield area and that Collier County should consider this as well as a means to stimulate economic development and redevelopment. After further discussion the CRA Advisory Board went on record unanimously, following a motion by Ms. Blanton and a second by Mr. Estremera that; · The CRA Advisory Board recommend to the CRA that the Advisory Board be the brownfield advisory committee for the Immokalee CRA area as provided for in Section 376.80(4) of Florida Statutes; · That a public hearing be held before the CRA Advisory Board during its November 14 meeting; and 5 16/ A.11 · That the CRA Advisory Board would like to haye the BCC consider designating the entire Enterprise Zone as a Brownfield Area at a later date. H. Citizen Comments. None I. Next Meeting Date (November 14,2007 at 8:30am) J. Adiournment. The meeting was adjourned at !O;15am. MINUTES Enterprise Zone Development Agency A. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 10; 15am. B Roll Call and Announcement of Ouorum Refer to joint meeting minutes aboye. C. Adoption of Agenda Refer to joint meeting minutes above. D. Approyal of Minutes of the September 19 and 26, 2007 meetings. Refer to joint meeting minutes above. E. Communications (see communications folder at meeting) F. Old Business I. Discussion of Web Page for EntellJrise Zone Development Incentives and How to Better Communicate the A vailabilitv of these Incentives hltP://www.colliergoy.net/lndex.aspx.?page= 1596 No discussion. 2. Discussion of Printing of Incentives Brochure Included with Agenda packet and no discussion. G. New Business I. CRA 2008-02: Robert Slate with Strategic SYstems, Inc. on Behalf of the Carlisle Deyelopment Group; Request Designation of Brownfield Area of the Crestview. Phases I and 2. Please see discussion under G3 of the CRA Adyisory Board meeting minutes. After further discussion the EZDA went on record unanimously, following a motion by Ms. Blanton and a second by Mr. Estremera that; · The EZDA recommend to the BCC that the Advisory Board be the brownfield advisory committee for the Enterprise Zone Area as provided for in Section 376.80(4) of Florida Statutes; · That a public hearing be held before the EZDA Advisory Board during its November 14 meeting; and · That the EZDA Advisory Board would like to have the BCC consider designating the entire Enterprise Zone as a Brownfield Area at a later date. H. Citizen Comments None I. Next Meeting (Noyember 14,2007 at 8;30am) J. Adiournment The meeting was adjourned at !O;30am. P~epJred by: )> -J.i_ 1 //-- / Y-<.~7 " 7}--~?-C~U?.-P/Yo.li~P Thomas Greenwood, Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Department 6 161 A * The next joint Advisory Board/EZDA/IMPVC meeting will be held December 19, 2007, at 8:30am at the Career and Seryice Center located at 750 South 5th Street in Immokalee. ** There is no scheduled IMPVC meeting at this time. Further meetings will be held at 5;30pm at the Career and Service Center located at 750 South 5th Street in Immokalee and will be appropriately noticed and announced in advance of such meetings. All meetings will be publicly noticed in the W. Harmon Turner Building (Building F), posted at the Immokalee Public Library and provided to the County Public Information Department for distribution. Please call Ekna Guevera, Planning Technician. at 239-659-5749 for additional information. In accordance with the American with Disabilities Act, persons needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact Ekna Guevera, Planning Technician, at least 48 hours before the meeting. The public should be advised that members of the Immokalee Master Plan and Visioning Committee and the CRA Advisory Board are also members of the other Boards and Committees, including, but not limited to: EZDA, lmmokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board, Immokalee Fire Commission, and the Collier County Housing Authority: etc. In this regard, matters coming before the IMPVC and the Advisory Board may come before one or more of the referenced Board and Committees from time to time. 7 ~\-f ~-t- f iala -;::::-1,; 1..:...---- Halas ---~ dennlng --ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE/RESCUE ~..,-- ';oy\e ORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES ('0Ietl3 '.' JAN. 3, 2008 ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE STATION 161 AI;> .~ ... ATTENDEES: Emilio Rodriguez, Fire Chief Kirk Colvin Bill Rafeldt, Advisory Board Member Joseph Langkawel, Advisory Board Member Thomas Decker, Adyisory Board Member Barbara Shea, Minutes Preparer I. CALL TO ORDER Ted Decker opened the meeting at 6;30 p.m. II. OLD BUSINESS A. December 2007 Advisory Board Meeting Minutes I. Copy of Minutes distributed and approved. 2. Minutes approved by all Advisory Board Members. 3. Kirk Colyin approved and signed Dec. 2007 Minutes. B. Chiefs Report I. Discussed monthly calls. 2. Distributed 2007 Annual Report. a. Highlights of 2007 discussed. b. Report to be emailed to Kirk for the residents. III. NEW BUSINESS A. Consolidation Study Group Operations Committee Report Issued I. Report was reported to County Fire Chiefs Assoc. Dec. 2007 . 2. Report will be presented to Steering Committee Jan. 2008. 3. Recommends consolidation. 4. BCC has not expressed any opinions. 5. Chief Rodriguez believes an independent consultant analysis is needed. 6. Discusses merger of all 9 fire districts and EMS. Mise Corres I G (A 17- 7. Cities of Marco Island & Naples could each opt out. Date: item#'. J to 161 A 12 ~;~ 8. Possibility of straw vote in November 2008. 9. Level of services would be enhanced with consolidation. 10. Limited cost sayings would be achieved. 11. Independent unions are in the process of merging. 12. State budget cuts favors the process of consolidation. 13. Implementation of merger estimated to be 5 years. 14. Current millage rates in the county range from .5 to 4 mils. B. Steering Committee; tentative Jan. 24 meeting. C. 2008 Fire Season expected to be severe. I. Less available resources this year. 2. Unknown availability of a helicopter. IV. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7;25 p.m. Approv ')./~ /63 . ( Date; 161 A12 ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE I RESCUE ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA Jan. 3,2008 CHIEF'S REPORT A. OPERATIONS REPORT B. VOLUNTEER REPORT C. TRAINING REPORT D. BUDGET REPORT OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS County wide Merger study BOARD AND CITIZENS' OPEN DISCUSSION .) 16/ Al, CIllEF'S REPORT Dee 31, 2007 OPERATIONS REPORT Isles 0 f Capri Fire / Rescue personnel provide 24 hour emergency services for the Isles of Capri commnnity with a consistent average response time 0[3 to 4 minutes. From 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., a minimum of at least four fully state certified Firefighters are assigned to the fire station. Additionally, the Isles of Capri Fire / Rescue Department has the only Advanced Life Support (ALS) equipped boats in Collier County. This means that a medical emergency on the water, be it a heart attack or trawnatic injury, can be handled with the most advanced emergency care possible in the field. The Isles of Capri Fire / Rescue Department welcomes citizens to stop by the station for free blood pressure checks. We also provide home and condo fire prevention inspections, along with CPR classes. "'UPDATES'" Isles of Capri Fire / Rescue is now an Advanced Ufe Support Provider (partnership with EMS) . In.Oistrlct o o o Fire Alarms Medical Alarms 2 o Ambulance Calls Vehicle Accidents Medical Assists 10 3 o Haz-Mat Calls Power Lines Down o o Boat Fire EMS via water Dive Rescue Search & Rescue Marine Assist o 2 o o o Public Assists Move-u Tech Rescue o o o Oiit4if~DI$ti1ct I MOiithtvtliiMJ. I' ................YTO......... "1 2 I 2 I 13 0 0 1 0 0 16 28 I 30 I 490 0 0 0 0 I 10 I 141 1 4 14 0 0 0 1 I 1 I 10 0 0 0 9. I 0 I 1 0 2 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 I 15 2 2 28 0 0 0 II 11 I 34 1451747 I I Total Note: In-District includes all Marine calls in District 01 (Collier County Waterways) 161 fA 13 CONSERVATION COLLIER k,,{ \:k LAND ACQUISITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE Fiala '. . . February 11, 2008, 9:00 A.M. Halas .' :~ Commission Boardroom Henning- ---. Hannon Turner Building (Building "F"), Third Floor Coyle -~10- __ AGENDA Coletta --~-- --- RollCall Approval of Agenda Approval of January 14,2008 Minutes Old Business: A. Real Estate Services Update - A-list properties B. Contracts I. Winchester Head V. New Business I. II. III. IV. l';""~ " A. Staff Report - BCC- approval of AAl B. Staff Report - Appointments for Conservation Collier Committee C. Letter of Thanks to CREW Trust for Starnes Partnership D. Cycle 6 applications E. Outreach Subcommittee Recommendation for Cycle 6 Target Areas F. Outstanding Advisory Committee Member Program G. Advisory Committee Service Awards H. Coordinator Communications VI. Subcommittee Meeting Reports A. Outreach - Tony Pires, Chair B. lands Evaluation and Management - Kevin Kacer, Chair C. Ordinance Policy and Procedures - Will Kriz, Chair VII. Chair Committee Member Comments VIII. Public General Comments IX. Staff Comments X. Adjourn ****************************************************************************************************** Committee Members: Please notify Alexandra Sulecki at 252-2961 no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 8. 2008 if YOU cannot attend this meetina. Mj" .rres Iltl Pr \'7:. Date item # ;) tG / V' ~lala ~~ ~-- E[ ~~~~ngf~~ ESTATES BEAUTIFICATION MSTU c:;oletta ~,-,,&l_:_- ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FI 34104 161 r~E:' ~ llri~ A If~' ,I r~) y. (.ou.!~ 1~r.iil n c.;" ,''.1 r,:v ~ .',~~ rn (')1 ;:::,: :)~: '2.r~;, January 17,2008 AGENDA I. Call Meeting to Order II. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes: December 20, 2007 V. landscape Maintenance Report - ClM VI. landscape Architect's Report - Michael McGee A. Doral Survey re-guarding Fence I new fence design with cost estimates VII. Budget Report A. Budget Committee -Caroline Soto & Bob Cole VIII. Transportation Operations Report A. Project Manager's Report - Darryl Richard B. Report re meeting with owner of Doral corner lot I re fence options IX. Housekeeping Items A. Rip rap repair on St. Andrew Blvd. near Cypress Gate Condominiums X. Committee Reports XI. Old Business A. Future Beautification Project List B. Vehicle Accident Report at front entry on 9-20-07 at 3:30 P.M. C. Damage to rip-rap placed on drainage canal bank by Cypress Lake condominium XII. New Business A. Grants - Therese Stanley Mise Corres: Dalej'lP} \\ \ 4- XIII. Public Comments item#: XIV. Adjournment :"Jy;to j The next meeting is scheduled for February 21, 2008 4:00 p.m. Collier County Transportation Building/East Conference Room 2885 Horseshoe Drive South, Naples, FL 34104 16 ! A 14 "....~ ..... o o ::::l N N 1-11)0 CI)_N :EO'" :>-ZGl .J::::l.c wu..E .J Gl U Gl o 1: ~'" 4: g' C- oo .- ( ? t:: "- '" o E ::>_ OJ ,J,.. 0:: IJ) (;f) (I) IF' (I' tn ll! UI I:h V; If, \.0 V! tA- lj) ii.., ".- ..... ~D.. .. o r.: c: &E O~ I"---f'.NOC\lgoo (O'I"'""......C\l1l) ......0 ....:r....:r....:-.i-~cicoo COOCOf'.COQ('t)(") (")ll) mf'.'If"IOOCl cri ..j oeo "'..... :gg ~'" "":or:i tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-ththfFttA-tA-tA-tA-tA-- ""J U (r: c" , c (j ;:: 0 .' (:~; C () "" "' c.- 0 1;') r: ,.; ~, c. ,-.J '" 0' " '. ~ v:: ..... - , , \b ,'.i ,.~, "<J' ,-, c (~ ,,-,:, a:; -E . c: Qi"cuc ~Q)~'m ~O)cno> ~ CJ)Q):;: roccc 2: 0. '- .?;> ~'c 0.. oc.."o..... ::J 0)00 rl .!!1 '0 c: '" rJ rl rl Q) CJ) c: ~Q) cn.::&:.co;;: roG) fJ) (I) r.n.~ Q)J:: :.;:::l "OcoU........-o"o-o-::::oo c: 16 c 'C "5 Q) ~ 0 c c c: t:: c: c (t~~c%~mE~5~.5~.f~ ~"'O ~ CO tJ)..J ::>ee.... CD uoo ..!Be( CIJ >,j.25 c: S;~~ .~1- E E_mVJ <.'JC1> [j)(I)U) QI-O ca :JCOe>Q) <(<(<(0)-00 z O"e"En:: 80cdoOEg<( .... OQ)-~ CCQ)Q)Q):J- CD~iiiE~1ii e~lDQ)Q)O""""~ "C '0= Eo.: Q)..J:J cGc)C> cn- m i Q)ooooa..CI)rouooes:~ >(jOOU::LLu..E~~:?!:::2n.a::(() SOf'-NCO~CONSOOg gCOOOOCOM 1l)lJ)('t)'I"'""......MNMOOV f'-OOO'lf"M ~ ..................... ~_~affi~o~~~g~~~~~g8g~~~ IV J!I co~ ,.... N <0_ ~ M N.. CT.I. CO ....._ i25~ ._," o. m. v. o. 0>. N. co. ~..-oo N...... M...... ~MIf'-v,....ll)cnll)lO >t-O moo..... - N _ N 'I"'"" N C\I - - - - -- 00 0 00 0 cici 0 00 0 CO 0 0_ IDO N ~ ~ 16/ A 14 ... ... N ... II> ,..: ... ... ... N ... II> ,..: ... eo......., "'.., 0) oj.na:i .....""'" oo~ ~NM 0"'og08.....,.....8g CX)NO 0 "l:tCOO ,.;.,..: o~. g'g'.o"':"": 00 "''''0 N~"'OO co..-Il) U')U)..-......cococo ri~.,.:NN~~I6ll'ill'i (f) "l:t"l:t NN ..-..- NN uttltfF.H:A'ut~ tltuttlttlttlt tit tltuttlt~~~m~uttlttlttlttlttlttlt~ut~~tIt~tlttlt~tltw .,88t:'NCOIOCON Oeo fLOO)C")..-......COC\l(f) _:sNMaj..q:cicrici""': ,..: ta_<c-OCO(f) .....C")co ..... .a:atq,t;,~co. ..-~~N. CD ucO) N C") (f) ct. c(CP~ - t:. - .. LLI~tIt~~~..,.EA-EA-tltEA-ChW O)CON......ONO C"),.....LOCOO......N cicO......:r--:ci""':..q: m~CX)COO<D...... mLO......M"l:t 0) -.irIS -.:i 00 ....'" IDcO ..,0 "'~- EA-EA-~~~~~EA-~EA-~tIt~EA-EA-~_~~EA-fiEA-EA-0EA-tIt J!l c: ., S "E E o oEA-~~~ 6" o "O...ci ~CPo C "0 N. ",,0 ~m~ EA-EA-~tIt 8 g N c:i ..... ~ I- 0 Z I-OwO:Ozwel ~~ ~j~~~~~~ r5;:;;w ~80;:;;;:;;~~00>1 Z ::l 00 w 5 0: -0:; - X 0: 0: 0: :; :; 00 0:. ...Joml-<(I-u.u.>>cnl- <c-,CJ)ZI-CJ)o:o:O:O:o:CJ) >~f-~I-WWWOOww cn....:::cn::>u.LJ...LJ...u.u.~ OOWI-WzCJ)CJ)>->-CJ)O~ <Cc(O:CJ)O:wzZO:O:Z"'i<< o:-,www>-O:;-O:;O:O:-O:;<.'J~ :J wI-> I- wo:o: -0:; c( 0: w: . oO~~~O:I-I-OOI-Z "-' o o 0' {!:, C ('.i 0;, r'-! l, ('001 C, C) g ~~;~; Ci C'J r'j o CD G' tD "<j. CC ':---,!'J ,-_.- (:'" :C "-.l C:-, (;C :~ ~; lD ''.i ~.j" lr, c': !, ~0m~~lnU)~~0fnmm~W~W0t1tEA-fiEA-~ 0000000000000 0000000000000 ci 0 g. ci ci 0 ci ci ci ci ci g' 0 00 00000000 0 "l:tOOOO"l:tOOCOOlOOO "':u1~cDcD ~Nu:iO cD~~ N...... ............... ...J - cnW C/) :J-o:;-, -0:; -,OO:J ml-<c -';:;; -o:;ZZO ::!!(5:J o:~;:;; ii:c(iiiW W I- W W WZ Z O:CJ)o:Qo ~WI- f-WO:",;:;; WWI-O<C w(5CJ) -o:;I-O...JW :I:WCJ)ZO: >- ~ZO-':I: I-U.O-f->-CJ)<.'JCJ) ~<(ZWO O<.'Jolt'Z!::OWo: It';:;;<cgm 8J~1-c(82~~~ c(<.'J<.'J:Effi wtifrlgo:g:O:c(><::I:g~~O::I: LL>a:::ClWOWa:~OOI-I-WI- <.'J 0: Ci Z :I: W I;;: 1il a: -':J Z :I:<.'J ~ :I: a: Z:J .,.1--'- 0- .,. a:I-W WCJ)~...JOW~~CJ);:;;...J::JO-Ou. .....N(f)<Q'lt)fD....COcn~::~::?:~~~~~ O.....N(")<Q'lt)fD....CO NNNNNNNNN EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-WEA-fiEA-WEA-WW~EA-WEA-WEA-EA-tltEA-EA-EA-EA-EA- o ~ "'''' 0")<.0 (); M 1'_ ...... <.0 ~ ~ ogogogo08og o 0 0 00 0 ggRgggggggsi .....colOU)U)i2SNCOC5coCD <<S.....~~NNN<<Sm.o..o ...... v"l:t NN .....- ~NN w 0: -' <.'J W 0 0::0 Z CJ)Z 0 0-0 1= <.'JZW ~ O-Ol-Z ZW<.'J>-Z <CI-CJ)O iili~~~~i!~:1 ~~~~~~~~~~~I OO::!!O 1-1- mml- a: 0::.'" gj~:;;~;:1~~~l:;~~~ Page lof3 161 n 14 ... .~ From: lulich_P Sent: Thursday, December 20, 20072:00 PM To: riley-m Cc: RichardDarryl; ftagg_d; DeniseWeaver; MoreraJorge; sillery_t; nabizad_s; BetancurNatali Subject: Lely Golf Resort / Doral Circle Buffer Proposal Mitch, This is the initial review of the Rattlesnake Hammock plans submitted by McGee & Associates, Lely MSTU. Sincerely, Pam REVIEW: The plan sheet is a proposal by the Lely MSTU to buffer or screen an area on Rattlesnake Hammock and put a buffer which does not exist along an existing wooden fence. 1. Follow the LDC for Buffer Yards.(See Below.) 2. The property line, right of way lines, fence layout are unreadable. The line weight is all the same. The scale needs to be larger so that it can be read. 3. Remove any plantings on private property, if the County will be maintaining the proposed planting. 4. Provide a detail of the proposed wall or fence; a. Detail of the design height, larger plan view, elevation with heights indicated. b. Cannot place a wall in the center line of the swale. 5. What is the irrigation source? Are you proposing to tap into the existing irrigation line? Will the existing irrigation source handle this? Is there room on the controller for another zone? 6. Stormwater engineering plans are required. A cross-section of the swale area is required. Elevations of the bottom of the swale and drainage direction. 7. Plant selection: a. Along the sides of the right of way, the foxtails are declining and we are planning to remove them. Please propose a native plant that can adjust to the existing conditions, rock base, high water ph. We are finding that the sabals and native palms do better than the foxtail. i. Select another palm. b. Bouganvilleas are not the appropriate plant for a swale. C. Are the conditions too wet for dwarf firebush. d. Plants appear to be on the wrong side of the fence. 7. Remove the shadows from the plan. Table of buffer yards. Types of buffers. Within a required buffer strip, the following alternative shall be used 12/20/2007 161 based on the matrix in table 204. A 1 4 1. Alternative A: Ten-foot-wide landscape buffer with trees spaced no more than 30 feet on center. When a Alternative A buffer is located within a residential PUD and adjacent to a lake, the required trees may be clustered on common property lines to provide views. Clustered tree plantings shall not exceed 60 feet between clusters. 2. Alternative B: Fifteen-foot-wide, 80 percent opaque within one year landscape buffer six feet in height, which may include a wall, fence, hedge, berm or combination thereof, including trees spaced no more than 25 feet on center. When planting a hedge, it shall be a minimum of ten gallon plants five feet in height, three feet in spread and spaced a maximum four feet on center at planting. When a Alternative B buffer is located within a residential PUD and adjacent to a lake, the required plant materials may be clustered to provide views. Clustered tree plantings shall not exceed 60 feet between clusters and the clustered hedge plantings can be provided as a double row of shrubs that are a minimum of 30 inches in height. When the adjacent lake exceeds 1500 feet in width the hedge planting shall not be required. 3. Alternative C: 20-foot-wide, opaque within one year, landscape buffer with a six- foot wall, fence, hedge, or berm, or combination thereof and two staggered rows of trees spaced no more than 30 feet on center. Projects located within the Golden Gate Neighborhood center district shall be exempt from the right-of-way requirement of a six- foot wall, fence, hedge, berm or combination thereof. These projects shall provide a meandering Type D landscape buffer hedge. In addition, a minimum of 50 percent of the 25-foot wide buffer area shall be composed of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. 4. Alternative D; A landscape buffer shall be required adjacent to any road right-of- way external to the development project and adjacent to any primary access roads internal to a commercial development. Said landscape buffer shall be consistent with the provisions of the Collier County Streetscape Master Plan, which is incorporated by reference herein. The minimum width of the perimeter landscape buffer shall vary according to the ultimate width of the abutting right-of-way. Where the ultimate width of the right-of-way is zero to 99 feet, the corresponding landscape buffer shall measure at least ten feet in width. Where the ultimate width of the right-of-way is 100 or more feet, the corresponding landscape buffer shall measure at least 15 feet in width, Developments of 15 acres or more and developments within an activity center shall provide a perimeter landscape buffer of at least 20 feet in width regardless of the width of the right-of-way. Activity center right-of-way buffer width requirements shall not be applicable to roadways internal to the development. a. Trees shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center in the landscape buffer abutting a right-of-way or primary access road internal to a commercial development. b. A continuous three gallon double row hedge spaced three feet on center of at least 24 inches in height at the time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one year shall be required in the landscape buffer where vehicular areas are adjacent to the road right-of-way, pursuant to section 4.06.05 CA. c. Where a fence or wall fronts an arterial or collector road as described by the transportation circulation element of the growth management plan, a continuous three gallon single row hedge a minimum of 24 inches in height spaced three feet on center, shall be planted along the right-of-way side of the fence. The required trees shall be located on the side of the fence facing the right-of-way. Every effort shall be made to undulate the wall and landscaping design incorporating trees, shrubs, and ground cover into the design. It is not the intent of this requirement to obscure from view decorative elements such as emblems, tile, molding and wrought iron. Page 2 00 "\'11 12/20/2007 16l A 14 page3~3 d. The remaining area of the required landscape buffer must contain only existing native vegetation, grass, ground cover, or other landscape treatment. Every effort should be made to preserve, retain and incorporate the existing native vegetation in these areas. Pam~I"lLuj~_h, RLt-~A~l.A Landscape Operations Manager Collier County Transportation Division Alternative Transportation Modes Department 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Florida 34104 Tele: (239) 530-6291 Fax: (239) 213-5899 (lgmlu Ii ch@colli ergov .net 12/20/2007 AG.TRONIX SPf.CIAUZIIIG 1M MaroRoIJ, IRIiGAIIOlI COMTIlOl S'mEMs 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239-657-5519 161 A 14 QUOl A liON/PROPOSAL DATE QUOTE NO. 10/22/2007 815 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOA lMffransportation 2885 HorsesIDe Drive South N .ples, FI. 34104 TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SI.:r ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL 2. Scorpio AC 16 Station wlRadio in Stainless Steel Enclosure F2848A UHF(450.470MHz) Scorpio AC 2io/8out w/ H1750 2 1,325.00 2,650.00 Radio FLN2154A Scorpio AC I/O Expansion Kit 2 225.00 450.00 F2805A Scorpio V2 AC 2 io/8 out 2 800.00 1,600.00 800-0365 12v Power Supply LDA50F 4.3amp 2 100.00 200.00 800-7106 H-IN-5 AC Po""r Cable 2 0.00 0.00 800-7111 H.OU-9 DC Power Cable 2 0.00 0.00 SB-18SS SS Enclosure 18W X 36H X 12D 2 1,290.00 2,580.00 PED-18SS SS Pedestals 18W X 12H X 10D 2 375.00 750.00 MLB-8-AC Surge Protector AC 2in/8out 4 266.50 1,066.00 85836 Low Profile Ant UHF 450-470 MHZ 2 90.00 180.00 51020-WM Leviton Surge Protection 2 189.00 378.00 8299-AW GFI WISwitch Leviton (l5Amp) 2 39.00 78.00 T.II Single Gang Box 2 3.99 7.98 Thank you for)Qur business. TOTAL $9,939.98 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. SIGNATURE AG.TRONIX SPECWJZliIIN MoToRolA IRIlllAnON CONTROL S1mIIs 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239-657-5519 161 " QUOT A TION/PR~P~~L DATE QUOTE NO. 10/22/2007 816 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOA 1M!fransportation 2885 Horsesroe Drive South Naples, FI. 34104 TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SLT ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL 1.Scorpio DC 8 Station wlRadio in Green Steel Powder Coated Enclosure F2948A UHF(450-470MHz) Scorpio DC 21N180UT I 1,360.00 1,360.00 MLB-8-DC Surge Protector DC 2 1N/8 OUT I 241.00 241.00 34962 Sunsaver 6 Voltage Regulator I 50.00 50.00 IS-SC02 Enclosure w/Hood, backpanel, w120W Solar Panel! UHF 1 1.980.00 1,980.00 Antenna, wlMounting Template 710-1300 12v Battery (25AH) Sealed I 89.00 89.00 Note: This enclosure has solar panel built inside. It's been a pleasure working with you! TOTAL $3,720.00 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. SIGNATURE AG.TRONIX SPICIAlJZJNG IN MOTOROlA IRRItATION CONTROl. SlSTEiIs 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239-657-5519 .161 A 14 QUOTATION/PROPOSAL DATE QUOTE NO. 10122/2007 817 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOA 1M!fransportation 2885 Horsesme Drive South Naples, FI. 34104 TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SLT ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL I-Scorpio OC 8 Station w/Radio in Stainless Steel Enclosure F2948A UHF(450-470MHz) Scorpio DC 2IN180UT I ] ,360.00 1,360.00 MLB-8-DC Surge Protector DC 2 IN/8 OUT ] 241.00 241.00 34%2 Sunsaver 6 Voltage Regulator ] 50.00 50.00 SB-18SS SS Enclosure 18W X 36H X 12D I 1,290.00 1,290.00 PED-18SS SS Pedestals 18W X 12HX IOD 1 375.00 375.00 BSP2012 20Wart Solar Panel 1 2]9.00 219.00 SPBMD Solar Parel Bracket I 55.00 55.00 85836 Low Profile Ant UHF 450-470 MHZ 1 90.00 90.00 710-1300 12v Battery (25AH) Sealed I 89.00 89.00 Collier County standard cabinet wi solar panel mount It's been a pleasure working with you! TOTAL $3,769.00 QUOlE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. SIGNATURE l6t A14 II Commercial Land Maintenance Full Service Landscape Management 3980 Exchange Ave. . Naples. FL 34104 Offfce: (239) 643.6205 . Fax: (239) 643.5012 E-mail: commland@aoJ.com INVOICMO. 1005963 CUSTOMER NO, BILL TO: Collier County Dept 01 TranalNoWiun 3311 Eat T...... TnIiI NIIplu, A 34tf2 LeIy - 04-3171 lEL Y CONS1RUCllON DAMAGE TO IRRlGA1l0N REPORTED BY BOB SlEBODNlK 11-26-07 2 IrriglIIion Technician Supervisor l.lIbor to Iroubluhoot conllruclion dBmllll8d irriglIIion. Replaced damaged irrlgIIIion heads and leak in pipe . Test sylIlem. 57.64 115.28 2 Irrigation T echnicilln Labor to al8illt with repairs 38.81 n.62 hi'! ." '\'1;... 1\., ".,. ,~, ~-a U \l\ ~, "'.0_, ,}" - r r- ,'~" ~~ . R~~CEIVE TOTAL $192. \.' " n 2007 Transportation Services Division THANK YOU! WE APPRECIATE YOUR BUSINESS PLEASE NOTE PAYMENT TERMS ON REVERSE SIDE 1.5% WILL BE ADDED MONTHLY TO ALL INVOICES OVER 30 DAYS UNTIL PAID December 20, 2007 161 ;t14 Prepared by: Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Tessie Sillery, Operations Coordinator, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Lely MSTU Project Status (L-43) : ACTIVE- (pac Danyl Richard) Doral Circle and Rattlesnake Hammock Wall and Landscaping Conceptual Design 11-7-07: WO # TLO-MA-3614-08-02 - $ 2, 490.00 for this project- WO in process of requesting signatures, 12-4-07: PO Issued and WO approved, 12-20-07: Initial plan review received by Pam Lulich, RLA, plans require revision, (L-41): ACTIVE -(PaC: ressic Sillery): - McGee & Assoc. Annual Contract: 04-3614 10-9-07: Committee approved McGees proposal for $8,525,00 10-24-07: Work Order in progress 11-6-07: County staff requested changes in the proposal. 11-9-07: Work Order in progress for signatures 12-4-07: PO Issued and WO approved, (L-39) - - ACTIVE {POC: Danyl Richard); Irrigation Refurbishment Project 9-20-07: Committee requosted for Roger Dick - County Irrigation Project Mgr. to attend next meeting, 10-18-07: Requested for estimates per Roger & McGee (team work) 11-7-07: Roger will review and attend the next Lely Meeting with quotes 12-10-07: Still reviewing pricing from AGTRONIX, 12-20-07: quote for project by CLM is pending; additional information plans/specifications requested by CLM, Confirmation of Ag- Tronix quotes by McGee pending, (L- 38) - ACTIVE (POC: DalTyl Richard): Palm Tree Replacement Project - medians 4 to 10 median tips 9-20-07: Committee requested CLM to quote project and discuss at next meeting, 10-16-08: CLM submitted estimates for upcoming meeting, 10-18-07: Committee, staff and Mcgee discussed quotes and requested clarification, 11-7-07: Danyl and Jim (CLM) will be meeting on 11-8-07 to review project. 11-15-07: Project approved by committee and staff - contractor to proceed with annual contract, (L-34) - ACTIVe: (Pac: I c"ic Siilery); Ongoing Maintenance Contract: Commercial Land Maintenance; Contract 04-3676 "Lely Golf Estates MSTU Roadway Grounds Maint." To Commercial Land Maintenance, Inc, - Bid # 04-3676 - plus 3 renewals. - expires on 9-28-08 10-12-07: New Fiscal Year 07-08 - PO issued and NTP given, (L-37) - ACTIVE - POC- (Tessie Sillery) : Bench Facing Lake Project 8-17-07: Committee requested for McGee & Commercial Land to go ahead and do the work, Bench with pavers, 8-22-07: Concept drawings due Sept, 20th for the committee, 9-20-07: McGee did not have drawings completed and will submit drawings to next meeting with costs for wall in order for committee to make decision on other projects, 10-18-08: Committee requested clarification of quote, 10-24-07: Pending CLM revising and Clarifying Quote 11-7-07: Darryl and Jim (CLM) will be meeting on 11-8-07 to review project, 11-14-07: Quote for Bench received - Swartz $ 793,80 11-15-07: Committee approved and bench is on order. 12-20-07: Bench order is pending delivery to CLM (L-40) - COMPLETE ! POC: Darryl Richard): - Lift Station Beautification (Baltusrol Course Crossing) 9-20-07: Committee approved up to $3,000 for work to be completed by CLM, 10-16-07: CLM submitted estimate - $ 3,789.30 - over limit committee motioned, 1 161 A 14 10-18-07: Committee approved quote, 10-18-07: Committee requeste McGee to do design, 11-7-07: Danyl and Jim (CLM) will be meeting on 11-8-07 to review project. 12-10-07: Utilities to address beautification, (L-42): COMPLETE - n (POC: Darryl Richard)- Rip Rap- by Cypress Lake Condominium 10-16-07: Committee requested Road and Bridge to put rip rap on bank, 12-10-07: Repaired and completed, (L-36) - COMPLETE -(POC: Darryl Richard); Doral Entrance Enhancements & Wall/Fence Project; Lely MSTU - Survey by RWA at Doral Circle PHASE Slart - End Date NTP CONST 9/24/2007 60 Day Const 11/23/2007 Project COMPLETE 11/23/2007 11/7/07 Rec'd survey 7-19-07: Committee approves $5,000.00 for survey of project area, Ball Park Cost provided from McGee indicates $25,000 Landscaping; $80,000 for wall; and $40,000 for a fence (on top the wall); Total Project is estimated as: $145,000,00 Committee Chair will contact Lely Civic Association for cost sharing for this project. 8-16-07: Update: RWA gave estimate for $ 7,900,00 and from staff recommendation for mstu members to make an amendment to previous motion from $5,000, to $7,900, 8-17 -07: Committee requested to cut down on the size of the parameters for the fence to go up and no more than $5,000 to spend on survey, - Also, looking at County paying (rattlesnake hammock funds) for the maintenance (Pam Lulich attended meeting and gave other landscape options) wall vs landscaping 8-22-07: Received estimate at $4,900 from RWA and will work order in process, 9-7-07: Rec'd WO from Vendor and in Work Order Process for additional signatures, 9-20-07: Rec'd PO 9-24-07: NTP - start date 9-24-07 and Completion date: 11-23-07 - PO # 4500084146 - Dated 9-20-07) WO # RWA-Ff-3944-07-O 8 - "Contract 06-3944 Annual Contract For Roadways" PROJECT SCHEDULE: (L-33) - COMPLETE {POC: Darryl Richard); Doral Circle Entry Feature Development; Includes installation of fence along Rattlesnake Hammock Road and adjoining entry features, 5-17-07: Committee votes to commit $2,500 in consulting fees to McGee for project. McGee will bring recommendations to 6-21-07 regular meeting, 6-15-07: Project Complete (L-22) - COMPLETE-(POC: Darryl Richard); (PROJECT PRIORITY #4 AS PER 11-17-06 MEETING) Angnsta Bonlevard at Forest Hill Planting Project - SCHEDULE: Lely MSTU: Augusta at Forest Hill- Landscape & Irrigation PHASE Start - End Date Committee Approval for Hannula quote 4/19/2007 BCC APPR Not Required (105 K estimate by McGee) NTP CONST 5/11/2007 60 DAY Substantial Completion 7/1112007 90 DAY CONST 5/11/2007-8/1012007 CONST-COMPLETE 8/10/2007 Status: Mike McGee has completed 100% plans for project; Presentation to Golf Course Management resulted in positive approval for project; Waiting on cost estimate from McGee & Associates, 2 161 A14 lI!I!I 5-30-06; Drawings dated 7/14/05 received from McGee; - Project will be scheduled for construction after phase 11 is completed, 7-18-06: Committee has placed project on hold until phase 1I completes, 8-22-06: Project is on hold with 100% plans approved by Golf Course and MSTU Committee, 11-16-06: Committee reviewed plans and McGee provided cost estimate of $30,000,00 for total project. MSTU Commitment for project estimated by McGee as $15,000,00; Committee Action is required to move project forward, 12-14-06: MSTU Committee selects to include golf cart crossing area into project. 1-17-07: Meeting with Golf Course Superintendent Allan Cooper to review project. 1-18-07: Golf Course Superintendent is reviewing project. Portion of project is outside of ROW, Portion of project outside of ROW requires Landscape Maintenance Agreement. One (I) Spare valve is available for use by the MSTU for project. 2-14-07: Request for Quote sent out- deadline March 9th, 2007 3-15-07: Committee to review quotes and select lowest quote, 4-10-07: Hannula is apparent low quote - Committee approval pending for $25,908,81 4-17-07: Committee approved for Hanula to do the job, 4-30-07: PO Request in process 5-11-07: Notice to Proceed sent to Hannula, Field meeting scheduled for May 22,2007, Meetings to re-occur each week on Tuesday's (L-32)- COMPLETE --{POC: Tessie Sillery ); Refurbish entrance sign - damaged by fallen palm at St. Andrews Sign. 4-17-07: Committee approved for Lykins PO to be opened to repair sign, Committee asked for more information on deflector plates, 5-17-07: Commitment from Lykins was to be complete by May 11,2007 inspection pending today's drive- through, 5-17-07: Project Complete (L-29) -{:OMPLETE --{POCo Tessie Sillery) - Median Re-Painting By Road & Bridge; As per Committee Request on 11-16-06 Road & Bridge needs to paint "4" numbers at each median opening, 12-20-06: No action taken by Road & Bridge to date, Road & Bridge contacted pertaining Committee request to paint curbing, 2-14-07: Painting not done by Road & Bridge 3-15-07: R&B supervisor (Don) will meet with staff to make sure the location of #'s 4-17-07: Meeting with Road & Bridge crew to start project on April 23, 2007 with Don Champlin, 4-30-07: Completed (L-30) - COMPLETE - (Pac: Tessie Sillery) Flag Pole Pole Maintenance - Committee requested staff to replace American Flag, 1-17-07: Facilities Maint. will replace flag today 1-18-07: Flags replaced 1-18-07: Committee requested for a different size flag 1-23-07 : Requested quote from Lykins 2-10-07: Single quotes and quotes for two for the committee to approve 2-15-07: Committee requested Tessie purchase flags through internet 3-10-07: State Flag and American Flags purchased (2 of each) $187,00 3-15-07: Flags arrived today..,!!! 3-17-07: Flags installed - re-order will be on an as needed basis, County replacement flag is on order. (L-25) -COMPLETE ~POC Darryl Richard): (PROJECT PRIORITY #3 AS PER 11-17-06 MEETING) Pebble Beach Blvd, Golf Cart Crossing Area Improvements 10-19-06: Committee directs Committee Chairman Bob Slebodnik to meet with Golf Course to determine if project is agreeable to Golf Course Management for Construction, 3 16' -.,oA 14 11-17-06: Committee Approved McGee & Associates Concept Based on Foxtail Palm installation, McGee & Associates to provide one signed and sealed plan and one reproducible not signed and sealed. 12-18-06: Quote for $10,801.94 received from Commercial Land Maintenance,- on hold until see below 12-18-06: Quote from CLM is approved for $10,801.94 under terms of annual contract. 1-17-06: Staff notified that existing irrigation is insufficient for project. Alternative solutions under review by McGee, 2-15-07: Requirments for project are: (I) need 2 separate valves for irrigation on each side of road; (2) need confmnation of energized mainline 24 hrs a day; (3) need Golf Course to relocate existing irrigation heads; Bob Slebodnick will contact Al Cooper and schedule a meeting time for follow-up, 3-14-07: Golf Course installing irrigation - 50% complete 4-10-07: Project Complete (L-24) -COMPLETE ,POCo Darryl Richard); - (PROJECT PRIORITY #2 AS PER 11-17-06 MEETING) DORAL CIRCLE LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND LIGHTING PROJECT - Need Committee Action for award of quote 6-15-06; Quotes received, issues with quotes and discrepancies identified, Committee requested that staff re-quote project with clarification conceming the discrepancies, 6-27-06: Waiting on quotes, 7-18-06: Need a bi<I-lal> Schedule from McGee & Associates and electrical engineering 8-17-06: Quotes from Annual Contractors for Electrical Installation/Design is pending. 8-21-06: Meeting with Bernie Sinunonds to answer questions regarding quote request. 8-21-06: Owner of Kent Technologies Thom Esch office visit. Thom receives updated copy of plans, 8-22-06: Quotes from Annual Contractors is pending, Due date is August 29, 2006, 8-31-06: Vendors contacted regarding quote: Kent confmns that they will quote, Simmonds will get back to staff on 9-1-06, 9-3-06: E,B, Simmonds Electrical quote received for $15,725,00 total electrical installation, Poles By County, 9-5-06; Bid Schedule revised and sent out. 10-19-06: Committee directs staff to obtain additional quotes, E,B, Simmonds quote rejected by Committee, Request for break-down of each line item from E,B, Simmonds, 10-30-06: E.B. Simmonds request meeting with Mike McGee and Staff to review project and quote, 11-7-06: E,B. Simmonds meets with Liaison Staff and reviews original quote, Project is re-quoted for $10,350,00 Committee Approval Required, 11-16-06: Lumec Sales Representative Ron Steedman confirms quote of $2,500 per light for a total of $5,000,00 Committee Approval Required, 11-17-06: Committee Approved E,B, Simmonds for $10,350,00; Approved $5,000,00 for Lumec; Approved $6,025,00 for Commercial Land Maintenance or other Contractor (ck with Purchasing), 12-20-06: Light Poles are on order, upon receipt E.B. Sinunonds will begin electrical work, followed by Commercial Land Maintance installation of irrigation and landscaping, 1-17-07 : Light poles are due to be delivered on March 2,2007 pending, PO Issued to EB Simmonds for Electrical, PO Issued to CLM for landscape project; After receipt of light poles EB Simmonds will install. 3-9-07: Received Lumec Poles for project 3-14-07: Poles picked up by EB Sinunons 3-20-07: Electrical Installation Completed by E,B. Sinunonds 4-10-07: Project Completed (L-32) - COMPLETE-,POC: Darryl Richard): Phase III Project: Refurbishment of Median #1 and #2 on St. Andrews at entrance to Lely off of US 41, 2-9-07: 100% plans received from McGee 2-15-07: CLM confirms quote for $8,734.47 for project. 3-15-07: Project Completed (L-31) - COMPLETE - Coordination with Ted Weiner - LMA Agreement 1-13-07: Letter from Ted Weiner - received and forwarded to Scott Teach 4 16/ A 14 2-15-07: No official confIrmation received from Weiner that they are baking out of LMA, Weiner had discussion with MSTU Committee Chair and requested assistance with Code Enforcement item, No further action is required on this item. (L-23) -{:OMPLETE - (Danyl) - (FDOT) (PROJECT PRIORITY #1 AS PER 11-17-06 MEETING) Lely Phase II-Landscape and Irrigation; Final 100% Design Approved by FDOT; Permit received from Bryan Dennis FDOT; Waiting on Notice to Proceed from FDOT (requires checklist approval); Checklist has been submitted to FDOT for approval. 5-1-06; FDOT Notice to Proceed is pending. Checklist has been approved, 5-15-06; Notice to proceed still pending, checklist has been approved, 5-30-06; FDOT NTP and drawings delivered to purchasing - pending advertisement from purchasing, 6-5-06: Contract Letting by Purchasing, Bids due by 6-30-06; BCC Approval for 7-25-06 meeting (Novus Deadline of7-10-06) 6-12-06: Bids are due June 30, 2006 - bee 7-25-06 6-15-06; Pre-Bid Meeting on June 20, 2006 6-27 -06; Addendum # I - in progress, 7-18-06; BCC to award bid to Vila & Sons -7-25-06 7-25-06: BCC Approved Vila & Son Contract 8-17-06: Purchasing reports that Vila & Sons is completing paperwork for FDOT portion of contract and will retum it back to Purchasing prior to issue of Contract/Purchase Order. 8-22-06: Vila & Sons to return paperwork to purchasing and anticipate availability for project within 2 weeks, Signed contract from Purchasing/County Attomey Office is pending, NTP is anticipated on September 5, 2006, 9-1-06: Contract sent to County Attorney Office for signature by Brenda Brilhart, 9-5-06: Conversation with Kay Nell indicates that Colleen Green is assigned to review contract, She suggests a follow-up call in 48 hours for confIrmation of approval. 9-19-06: Notice to Proceed for Vila & Son; project begins: September 19,2006 with 90 day contract period ending December 18, 2006, 11-6-06: Vila & Son Pay Application # 1 reviewed and rejected due to non-completion of' Preparation for Planting' line item, Pay Application will be sent back to contractor for revision, 11-7-06: Revised pay application approved for payment. Project is 57 % completed, 1-17 -07: Substantial Completion Inspection; Punch-List Complete for outstanding items, Present were: Philip Thibeaux, Vila & Son; Danyl Richard, A TM Liaison; and Mike McGee, McGee & Associates; Roger Dick, [rrigation Project Manager. 2-21-07: Confirmation Final Close-out change order is processed (CO #2), (L-26) - COMPLETE - Order for new Sign - Pebble Beach Median # 19 8-17-06: Lely MSTU Committee requested that Staff have Lykins provide quote for downed sign at median #19 Pebble Beach Drive, 8-31-06: Staff request that Lykins provide quote for issue of PO. 9-8-06: Quote Received, but committee did not approve the amount. - Only to get a quote. 10-9-06: Staff requires Lely MSTU Committee approval for this item in order to proceed, 10-19-06: Committee review of item, Consensus is that item is not an MSTU Project and is the concem of the Lely Civic Association (HOA), The sign was originally installed by the HOA, (L-28) - COMPLETE - PEBBLE BEACH OVERPASS PROJECT -Road & Bridge to reconstruct asphalt on overpass, No confIrmation of schedule from R& B as of today - 3-6-06 and as of5-15-06 5-30-06; Stormwater Director (Calvert) is working on project estimate and scope, To be complete within 2 weeks, 7-18-06: Jerry Kurtz reports project is not funded this fIscal year and there are no immediate project needs, 8-17-06: Lely MSTU Committee request review of project and reconsideration for project schedule, 8-18-06: Eugene Calvert sends email indicating that the project is not scheduled/funded by Stormwater, 8-22-06: Committee has requested review of previous determination by Storm water that the project does not warrant action by Storm water, A TM Liaison Staff has set up a meeting on August 24, 2006 at I :00 PM to discuss, 8-24-06: Staff meets with Committee Chairman Bob Slebodnik to review project. 9-1-06: RLS sent to Scott Teach to confIrm that the MSTU can fund 50% of $65,000,00 project; Stormwater Dept. would fund other 50%, 5 16/ A 14 9-11-06: RLS response by Scott Teach indicates that the MSTU cannot ftmd the project. Pending Committee action to cancel project, the project cannot be funded by MSTU funds, 10-19-06: As per County Attorney's review and response project is determined to be a 'non-MSTU' Project and falls outside of the authorization as per Current MSTU Ordinance. (L-25) - COMPLETE-Pending Committee Action - PALM TREE REPLACEMENT - MCGEE recommendations pending as per committee request. Committee is interested in Foxtail Palms.- 7118/06: McGee provided quote and committee waiting for phase 11 before proceeding with project. 8-17-06: McGee formal written proposal is pending, 8-17-06: Staff requests a formal written proposal from McGee & Associates at MSTU Meeting, 8-22-06: Written Proposal from McGee is pending, 9-11-06: Anticipated delivery date 9-30-06 10-19-06: McGee provides cost estimate with recommendations for Committee, Committee Action is required to proceed with Project. (L-27) - COMPLETE - Order for new Sign at Entrance Lely MSTU US 41 at St. Andrews; Lykins quote for $760.00 approved by Committee on July 20, 2006, 7-24-06: Staff request to purchase for Lykins in the amount of$760,OO 8-17-06: Lykins installation of sign pending, 8-22-06: PO issued to Lykins for installation of sign, Installation to be complete by 2"' week Sept. 8-31-06: Proof will be forwarded to Staff on 9-1-06 for review, 9-7-06; Danyl approved the proof, 9-22-06: Lykins begins installation of sign, 10-1-06: Lykins installation complete (L-21) COMPLETE - Flag lighting - not working.- Anticipated completion date - September 30th, 2006 8-17-06; Eb Simmonds contacted for lighting and flagpoles and took care of problem under contract - no fee charged 10-10-06: Lights reported 100% operational by Committee Chairman (L-I) - COM PI,ETE- Spraying of Exotic vegetation at St. Andrews Canal-Travis Gossard contacted regarding request for re~spraying of exotics. 8-22-06: Danny Dominguez confirms that the re-spraying of the Canal has taken place, (L -2) - COMPLETE--Painting of Curbs and Yellow Paint at Median Tips 6-15-06; Estimate for work approved minus purchase of material (paint), Staff to obtain material separate to Commercial Land Maintenance proposal. 6-23-06: Requested Gerald Morris to let us know - R&B painting schedule and paint in stock? 7-6-06: Gerald emailed giving us an update on their painting schedule and asked J.Vliet to respond to us, 7-18-06; Spoke to John Vliet and he stated to make sure to use FDOT standards on paint and not to change anything, Just repaint. 7-18-06; Will purchase paint at Sherwin Williams and provide to CLM, 7-20-06: Paint and materials dropped off to CLM 8-15-06: CLM performing painting, curbs completed, painting of numbers not complete 8-22-06: Project is completed, (1.-3) -COMPLETE -Sign Plantings of Crown of Thorn (Augusta at Forest Hill) - CLM directed to plant crown of thorn at existing sign on July 20, 2006, 8-14-06: Inspection indicated that plantings had not occurred CLM contacted, 8-22-06: Plantings of Crown of Thorn is completed, (L-4) COMPLETE- Solar lighting - HOA Project - Augusta Boulevard at Forest Hill Sign Lighting Project- HOA to ftmd installation, MSTU to pay for V, of construction cost. 6 161 a 1 h I 5-15-06: Pending Purchasing approval 5-30-06: Kent Tech is revising their estimate as per contract, 6-12-06: Kent tech has provided requested quote, item being processed by FinancelPurchasing (L-5) -COMPLETE-Lely Phase II- (Electrical & Lighting & Irrigation Controllers): - Construction Cost: EB Simmonds Cost $23,010,00; Lumec Cost $17,050,00 ($1,550 per pole wi 11 poles) ~Total Project $40,060,00, E,B, Simmonds is complete. FPL to power up Meter-pending. 5-1-06; FPL and EB Simmonds work complete, (L-6) COMPLETE-Potable Water Meter Removal (L 7) -COMPLETE-Repair of Asphalt on Forest Hill - COMPLETE; Andy Vanisak, Road & Bridge, performed repairs to the area at no cost to the MSTU; Initial Repair Complete (L-8) Flag Replacement- COMPLETED-Flag Order for poles at St, Andrews and US 41 6-15-06; as per committee request the flags will be ordered twice a year or "as needed" (L-9) -COMPLETE-Lely Phase 1- Complete (311105) - COMPLETED (L-IO) -COMPLETE-Drainage Project -Pebble Beach Road- Non-MSTU Project (L-ll) -COMPI,ETE-Drainage Project -St. Andrews Boulevard-Embankment Cleaning- 100% (L-12) COMPLETE-Baltusrol Culvert Inlet Clean-Out 5-12-06; Project Competed by Commercial Land Maintenance (L-13) -COM PLETE-Baltusrol Overpass Asphalt Repair - at the request of the Committee Chairman Road & Bridge performed the repair. 3-10-06; Project Completed by Road & Bridge (L-14) -COMPLETE-Baltusrol Tree near lift station; Committee requested staff investigate weather the tree identified near the existing lift station was the responsibility of the MSTU to maintain as it was severely damaged by Hurricane Wilma, had been subsequently removed by others, and a huge stump remained, 2-2-06; Investigation by Staff concludes that the tree stump is outside of the Right of way on Baltusrol and that the tree is either on Golf Course Property or Lot owner at Lot 133 Baltusrol. (L-15) COMPLETE- "Pinehurst Estates" Sign Area on Baltusrol Landscape Project; Refurbishment Project to address the non-planted areas around the existing signs for the entrance into Pinehurst Estates-Lely MSTU Area, 5-5-06; Project Completed by Commercial Land Maintenance, (L-16) COMPLETE-Dora! Circle: Pepper Tree Removal 6-1-06; Road & Bridge Contacted concerning the removal of pepper tree within County Right of Way, 6-15-06; Pepper Tree reported removed (L-17) -COMPLETE-Doral Circle Sign Lighting Project 3-15-06Project Completed by Kent Technologies under contract with Lely MSTU, (L-18) -COMPLETE-Doral Circle Bench Area Refurbishment Project. Committee directed staffto obtain quotes for Commercial Land Maintenance to pressure clean pavers and apply protective sealant, replace decking on benches, and reset shrubs in planted beds, 2-10-06; Project reported complete by Commercial Land Maintenance, (L-19) - On Hold- Phase II Project; Advanced Bench Order and Installation; As per Committee request quote was requested of Commercial Land Maintenance for the installation of benches to include storage. The order for the 7 16 / A 14 benches was on hold due to the storage issue, As per the Bid Letting on June 5, 2006 and following Pre-Bid meeting the benches are to be included in the bid for Phase II Project as an alternate, (L-20) - COMPLETE -FLAG POLE REPLACEMENT- a, Received Quotes from annual contractors and other vendors. Lykens Sign Tech was low quote, Purchasing recommended Lykens Sign Tech, committee cancelled project. b, Committee has requested CLM to demolition existing poles and bases as per annual contract rates not to exceed $2,500,00 after demolition, quotes will be requested from Sign Companies, 5-1-06; PO issue is pending as per Committee Approval. 5-15-06; Sign Craft received NTP on 5-12-06 and waiting on material order - drawing prepared.- 3 weeks estimated for poles to be received, 6-12-06: flag poles to arrive within 1 week. - On site meeting with contract to confirm locations, 6-15-06; Flag poles and all materials received by contractor; Installation to begin upon receipt of Permit from Collier County Sign Permitting, 6-27-06 : to be installed by June 30'" pending CDS review of construction pad 7-3-06: Flag Poles are up with flags, For 4'" of July..!!!! 8 161 A 14 ~:~~ing~ ~fO~ ~.' Rr~~,EI\fFD c;oyle ----6 JI. Coletta ~GOLF ESTATES BEAUTIFICATION MSnJ,,,,,,,(,m"''''''''''l<e,, ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FI 34104 December 20, 2007 Minutes I. The meeting was called to order by Bob Slebodnik at 4:00 PM. II. Attendance: Members: Tony Branco, Robert Cole, Kathleen Dammert, David Larson, Robert Slebodnik County: Darryl Richard-Project Manager, Tessie Sillery - Operations Coordinator, Caroline Soter-Budget Analyst Others: Mike McGee - McGee & Associates, Jim Fritchey - Commercial Land Maintenance, Darlene Lafferty - Mancan III. Approval of Agenda Add: XI. D. Replacement of Lantana with Impatients at Front Entry. Robert Cole moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Second by David Larson. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. IV. Approval of Minutes: November 15, 2007 Tony Branco moved to approve the November 15, 2007 Minutes as submitted. Second by Robert Cole. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. V. Landscape Maintenance Report - CLM Jim Fritche reported: . Mulching is complete . Installation of Foxtail Palms & Bougainvillea complete VI. Landscape Architect's Report - Michael McGee A. Doral Survey re-guarding Fence I new fence design with cost estimates Doral Survey Darryl Richard distributed an Initial Review by Pam Lulich & reported the following: (See attached) }> A revision to the plans was required }> The recommendation was made to refrain from accessing the ~~es property on the corner of Doral & Rattlesnake Hammock Rd, Date item#' -,., -'s tc ~ Recommended delaying meeting with Property Owners until Plans are complete 1 ~ A pe~mit "may" be required from CDS (Community Development 6 if A 1 ,. Services) 'I ~ Concerns with the Design work in the Swale that runs parallel to the fence line 1. Recommendation for review of the Storm Water Management by an Engineer, as it could affect the Hydrology along the Swale ~ Mike McGee would assess the Initial Review Discussions ensued & was determined Cross Sections would be required. The Cross Sections & materials would be resubmitted to Pam Lulich for review. It was suggested that the Engineer Study be paid by the County, Darryl Richard announced the ATM would assume responsibility for maintaining the Plant & Shrub material on Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. Discussion continued & it was noted that the inclusion of the private property on the corner of Doral & Rattlesnake Hammock would improve the safety of the intersection. A decision must be made re-guarding the inclusion of the private property before the Plans will be completed, The recommendation was made for Pam Lulich to visit the site. VII. Budget Report A. Budget Committee - Caroline Soto - Bob Cole Budget Report was distributed and reviewed (See attached), . Improvements General Available $241,500.00 . An invoice was issued to True Wave in the amount of $192.90 for the Irrigation damage Darryl Richard reported on incomplete re-grading by the Contractor. He relayed the Committees dissatisfaction with the incomplete work. He noted the Committee request for ATM liaison. Robert Cole questioned the requested $40,000 transfer from Improvements General to the Operating Budget. Caroline Soto responded that a P,O. Modification was done in lieu of the transfer. It was agreed that a Budget Amendment to include the $40,000 transfer as per the Motion would be presented at the January 17, 2008 VIII. Transportation Operations Report A. Project Manager's Report - Darryl Richard distributed and reviewed (See attached): o (L-39) Irrigation Refurbishment Project - Additional Internal Review required by Darryl Richard, Mike McGee, & Roger Dick o (L-38) Palm Tree Replacement Project - Complete o (L37) Bench facing Lake Project - Brick Pavers are installed, waiting for arrival of Bench 2 Robert Slebodnik stated Project (L-42) Rip Rap-by Cypress Laker 6 I Condominium is not complete. J. Darryl Richard will follow up with Road & Bridge concerning the Rip Rap completion. Reported repair work is required on the overpass noted the asphalt is giving way. Discussions ensued and was determined the asphalt work last year was a temporary repair. A request was made to inquire with Road & Bridge when the permanent repair is scheduled, o (L-34) Ongoing Maintenance Contract: Commercial Land Contract expiration date 9-28-08 was noted B. Report Re meeting with owner of Doral Corner lot I re fence options - Previously discussed VI. A. IX. Housekeeping Items A. Rip rap repair on St. Andrews Blvd. near Cypress Lake Condominiums - Previously discussed VIII. A. B. Paving on Pebble Beach Blvd. near golf cart crossing. None X. Committee Reports - None XI. Old Business A. Future Beautification Projects - On hold B. Vehicle Accident Report at front entry on 9-20-07 at 3:30 P.M.- With Risk management for collection. C. Damage to rip-rap placed on drainage canal bank by Cypress Lake condominium - Previously discussed VIII. A. XII. New Business A. Grants - Therese Stanley (not present) The request was made for the attendance of Therese Stanley at the January 17, 2007 meeting for direction on reimbursement for the Irrigation Project XIV. Public Comments - None Robert Slebodnik thanked the Committee & Staff for the hard work & cooperation throughout the year. XV. There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 5:23 P.M. 3 A 14 Lely Golf Estates BeautificatiolJw MSTU Advisory Committee J. 6 I cCt~.t .&u;t Robert Slebodnik, Chairman These minutes approved by the Committee on /- 17- 0& as presented .j or amended The next meeting is scheduled for January 17, 20074:00 p.m. Collier County Transportation Building/East Conference Room 2885 Horseshoe Drive South, Naples, FL 34104 4 A 14 ,~-" """) )." "--~{!I.'({9tr. j ~-'~-':: . ~~fH~ (' .- ......:=:-:......,. ',.,l)fJH!)i$S -'---'''''::~.:.: ~?2pfS ~~ Fiala Halas -,-- Hennin9--- Coyle ':J;-'-- Coletta ~p GOLF ESTATES BEAUTIFICATION MSllJ6 , ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FI 34104 n December 20, 2007 lLt -- AGENDA I. Call Meeting to Order II. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes: November 15, 2007 V. Landscape Maintenance Report - CLM VI. Landscape Architect's Report - Michael McGee A. Dora I Survey re-guarding Fence I new fence design with cost estimates VII. Budget Report A. Budget Committee -Caroline Soto & Bob Cole VIII. Transportation Operations Report A. Project Manager's Report - Darryl Richard B, Report re meeting with owner of Doral corner lot I re fence options IX. Housekeeping Items A. Rip rap repair on SI. Andrew Blvd. near Cypress Gate Condominiums B, Paving on Pebble Beach Blvd. near golf cart crossover X. Committee Reports XI. Old Business A, Future Beautification Project List B. Vehicle Accident Report at front entry on 9-20-07 at 3:30 P.M. C. Damage to rip-rap placed on drainage canal bank by Cypress Lake condominium MISC, eOfTes: XII. New Business A. Grants - Therese Stanley Date: XIII. Public Comments Ilem#: XIV. Adjournment Copies to: / The next meeting is scheduled for January 17, 20084:00 p,m. Collier County Transportation Building/East Conference Room 2885 Horseshoe Drive South, Naples, Fl34104 161 A 14 161 ~ECEIVED FEB 0 8 2008 ~:~=s ____---- t.~ Henning---- JI. g~r~~ta~&rmATES BEAUTIFICATION MSTU ADVISORY COMMlnEE 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FI 34104 BO;-':!n1 :;;r '~~(ltmty COfnrrtisSIO/lerS 14 November 15,2007 Minutes I. The meeting was called to order by Bob Slebodnik at 4:02 PM. II. Attendance: Members: Tony Branco, Robert Cole, Kathleen Dammert, David Larson, Robert Slebodnik County: Darryl Richard-Project Manager, Tessie Sillery - Operations Coordinator, Caroline Sob-Budget Analyst, Roger Dick - Irrigation Project Manager Others: Mike McGee - McGee & Associates, Jim Fritchey - Commercial Land Maintenance, Darlene Lafferty - Mancan III. Approval of Agenda Add: VI. A. Doral Survey re-guarding Fence / new fence design with cost estimates XIII. B, Landscaping damage on US41 from St. Andrews Blvd. to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. Kathleen Dammert moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Second by David Larson. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. IV. Approval of Minutes: October 18, 2007 Change: II. Attendance should read Darryl Richard "arrived late" Pg. 2 VIII. A. Motion carried unanimously "4-0" Pg. 3 paragraph 4 should read It was recommended to delay the installation until more infonnation was available "including a plan from McGee & Associates" but proceeding with the lift station staining. XIII. Should read Tony Branco inquired if the pothole located "at the entrance to the assisted living" could be filled. Tony Branco moved to approve the October 18, 2007 Minutes as amended. Second by Kathleen Dammert. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. MIS, : ,reS Date i,tem#: -- , , V. Landscape Maintenance Report - CLM Jim Fritche reported: . Mulching is in progress . Removal of stump at median #3 . Bench pavers are in progress . Trimmed Bougainvillea around the Carpentaria Palms 161 A 14 Darryl Richard requested quote approval from Swartz Associates in the amount of $793.80 for bench purchase. (See attached) Robert Cole moved to approve purchase of bench from Swartz Associates for $793.80 to be installed at Forest Hills & Augusta intersection. Second by David Larson. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. VI. Landscape Architect's Report - Michael McGee A. Doral Survey re-guarding Fence I new fence design with cost estimates Doral Survey Mike McGee reported: . 1 dry Alamanda hedge on the outbound side of US41 entry, Recommended increasing zone watering time . Agapanthus is 50% gone on the outbound side. The inbound side is 75% full, Recommended replacing with one of the following: 1. Blueberry Fox Lily or 2, Bougainvillea Silhouette Discussion ensued concerning replacement of the Agapanthus & the annual Lantana plantings, Robert S/ebodnik moved to replace the Lantana at the front entry & substitute with a bouquet of Impatients & remove Agapanthus and replace with Silhouette Bougainvillea as per maintenance contract. Second by Robert Cole. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Mike McGee reviewed the Doral Circle Fence Project. Reported the Survey did not indicate a drainage easement on the properties but did show a swale along the property line. The fence located on the corner of Doral Circle & Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. was on private property & curved inward ranging from 1 to 10 ft inside the property line. Reviewed 2 proposed drawings based on the survey: 1, Keeping the Fence inside ROW which would not improve sight visibility on the corner lot as originally planned. 2. Install the Wall or Fence 6-7 ft. closer to the road which would require a 6 fl easement on the property. Noted the property owner would gain yardage. In addition a license agreement to install the Fence & Landscaping would be required. 2 Reviewed an estimate in the amount of $114,793.50 to include: (See attached) 16 I ~ Site Demolition, Preparation, & Disposal ~ Site Materials - Retaining Wall & Decorative Concrete Fence ~ Plant Material - Foxtail Palms, Dwarf Firebush, & Bougainvillea Silhouette ~ Irrigation Materials ~ No contingency is included A 14 Discussions ensued for the following: . Approval & coordination with property owner for easement access. Mike McGee, Darryl Richard & Dave Larson were asked to meet with the owner of the corner lot to discuss Fence options . Clarification from Pam Lulich if an agreement could be secured for MSTU to maintain the installation on Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. under ATM funding . Request A TM funding for landscaping . Request Storm Water funding for the improved drainage Robert Slebodnik summarized 1, Jurisdiction review by Pam Lulich 2. Additional drawing details are required for expenditure of money Robert Cole moved to proceed with McGee & Associates plans for the new wall along Rattlesnake Hammock. Mr. Richard will negotiate with Pam (Lulich) about future maintenance of the wall & also negotiate with the comer property owner at Dorsi & Rattlesnake Hammock about changing their ROW or easement. Second by David Larson. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Mike McGee reviewed a quote from AG-TRONIX in the amount of $17,480 for the Master Control System conversion at US41 & St. Andrews. Discussions ensued on various alternatives for the conversion, The following was noted: . An additional $5400 would be required to include Doral Circle in the Master Control System conversion, . The AG-TRONIX quote did not include installation & would require additional quotes from installation contractors. . Available Grant Funds Tony Branco moved ahead to install this internet connected communicating System that will monitor evel}' possibility that can go wrong in our irrigation. Not to exceed $25,000. Second by Robert S/ebodnik. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. I was suggested to invite Therese Stanley - Grants Coordinator to attend the December 20,2007 meeting, VII. Budget Report A. Budget Committee - Caroline Soto - Bob Cole 3 Budget Report was distributed and reviewed (See attached)." 6 I . Requested $40,000 Budget amendment was incomplete A14 VIII. Transportation Operations Report A. Project Manager's Report - Darryl Richard distributed and reviewed (See attached): o (l40) Lift Station Beautification - Utilities Department has committed to staining or painting the lift station at County expense The Committee was very adamant that the County use stain in lieu of paint. o (l37) Bench facing lake Project - Bench pad installation in progress by ClM B. Landscaping damage on US41 from St. Andrews Blvd. to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. - Darryl Richard reported Kent Technologies was responsible for repairs to the damaged sod & irrigation. IX. Housekeeping Items A. ROW patch on Sl Andrews Blvd. - Darryl Richard reported Road & Bridge reviewed the pothole on the side of the road and determined it was located in a private drive and was a homeowner issue X. Committee Reports - None XI. Old Business A. Future Beautification Projects - None B. Vehicle Accident Report at front entry on 9-20-07 at 3:30 P.M.- None C. Damage to rip-rap placed on drainage canal bank by Cypress Lake condominium - Darryl Richard stated Road & Bridge will not replace rip-rap. Robert Slebodnik reported conducting a drive through with Donna Fiala pointing out the drainage bridge. Noting that unfinished projects are detracting from MSTU Beautification. Suggestions were given to Mr. Slebodnik & Ms. Fiala requested to be copied in on all correspondence ' Robert Cole inquired about Civic Association contribution for the Fence Project. Discussions ensued. David Larson stated the Civic Association agreed to commit funding for landscaping. It was agreed to accept $11,000 for landscaping, XII. New Business - None XIV. Public Comments - None 4 xv. ~,~ .t~ ~ -- I ' 1 ' "." There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 5:57 P.M. Lely Golf Estates Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee --:' ~/ / ,/k;:td U47J Robert Sleb6dnik, Chairman These minutes approved by the Committee on as presented or amended if ii/SOl The next meeting is scheduled for December 20, 2007 4:00 p.m. Collier County Transportation Building/East Conference Room 2885 Horseshoe Drive South, Naples, Fl 34104 5 14 16/ A 14 November 15,2007 Prepared by: Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Tessie Sillery, Operations Coordinator, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes . Lely MSTU Project Status (L-43) : ACTIVE - (pOC Darryl Richard) - Doral Circle and Rattlesnake Hammock Wall and Landscaping Conceptual Design 11-7-07: WO # TLO-MA-3614-08-02 - $ 2, 490,00 for this project - WO in process of requesting signatures, (L-42): ACTIVE - (POC: Darryl Richard) - Rip Rap- by Cypress Lake Condominium 10-16-07: Committee requested Road and Bridge to put rip rap on banl", (L-41): ACTIVE -(POC: fessie Sillery}-: - McGee & Assoc. Annual Contract: 04-3614 10-9-07: Committee approved McGees proposal for $8,525,00 10-24-07: Work Order in progress 11-6-07: County staff requested changes in the proposal. 11-9-07: Work Order in progress for signatures (L-40) - ACTIVE -(POCo Oanyl RIchard); - Lift Station Beautification (Baltusrol Course Crossing) 9-20-07: Committee approved up to $3,000 for work to be completed by CLM, 10-16-07: CLM submitted estimate - $ 3,789,30 - over limit committee motioned, 10-18-07: Committee approved quote, 10-18-07: Committee requeste McGee to do design, 11-7-07: Danyl and Jim (CLM) will be meeting on 11-8-07 to review project. (L-39) - - ACTIVE (POC Darryl Richard); Irrigation Refurbishment Project 9-20-07: Committee requested for Roger Dick - County Irrigation Project Mgr. to attend next meeting, 10-18-07: Requested for estimates per Roger & McGee (team work) 11-7-07: Roger will review and attend the next Lely Meeting with quotes, (L- 38) - ACTIVE -(PaC Darryl Richard): Palm Tree Replacement Project - medians 4 to 10 median tips 9-20-07: Committee requested CLM to quote project and discuss at next meeting, 10-16-08: CLM submitted estimates for upcoming meeting, 10-18-07: Committee, staff and Mcgee discussed quotes and requested clarification, 11-7-07: Darryl and Jim (CLM) will be meeting on 11-8-07 to review project. (L-34) - ACTIVE -(PaC: Tessic Sillery): Ongoing Maintenance Contract: Commercial Land Maintenance; Contract 04-3676 "Lely Golf Estates MSTU Roadway Grounds Maint," To Commercial Land Maintenance, [nc, - Bid # 04-3676 - plus 3 renewals. - expires on 9-28-08 10-12-07: New Fiscal Year 07-08 - PO issued and NTP given, (L-37) - ACTIVE - POC- (Tessie Sillery) : Bench Facing Lake Project 8-17-07: Committee requested for McGee & Commercial Land to go ahead and do the work, Bench with pavers, 8-22-07: Concept drawings due Sept. 20th for the committee, 9-20-07: McGee did not have drawings completed and will submit drawings to next meeting with costs for wall in order for committee to make decision on other projects. 10-18-08: Committee requested clarification of quote, 10-24-07: Pending CLM revising and Clarifying Quote 11-7-07: Danyl and Jim (CLM) will be meeting on 11-8-07 to review project. 11-14-07: Quote for Bench received - Swartz $ 793,80 1 161 A 14 ,-.,..., (L-36) - COMPLETE - (PaC Darryl RlchardJ~ Doral Entrance Enhancements & Wall/Fence Project; Lely MSTU - Survey by RWA at Doral Circle PHASE Start - End Date NTP CONST 9/24/2007 60 Day Consl 11/23/2007 Project COMPLETE 11/23/2007 11/7/07 Ree'd survey 7-19-07: Committee approves $5,000,00 for survey of project area, Ball Park Cost provided from McGee indicates $25,000 Landscaping; $80,000 for wall; and $40,000 for a fence (on top the wall); Total Project is estimated as: $145,000,00 Committee Chair will contact Lely Civic Association for cost sharing for this project. 8-16-07: Update: RWA gave estimate for $ 7,900,00 and from staff recommendation for mstu members to make an amendment to previous motion from $5,000, to $7,900, 8-17-07: Committee requested to cut down on the size of the parameters for the fence to go up and no more than $5,000 to spend on survey, - Also, looking at County paying (rattlesnake hanunock funds) for the maintenance (Pam Lulich attended meeting and gave other landscape options) wall vs landscaping 8-22-07: Received estimate at $4,900 from R W A and will work order in process, 9-7-07: Rec'd WO from Vendor and in Work Order Process for additional signatures, 9-20-07: Rec'd PO 9-24-07: NTP - start date 9-24-07 and Completion date: 11-23-07 - PO 1/4500084146 - Dated 9-20-07) WO 1/ RWA-Ff-3944-07-O 8 - "Contract 06-3944 Annual Contract For Roadways" PROJECT SCHEDULE: (L-33) - COMPU,:TE( pac Darryl RichardL Doral Circle Entry Feature Development; Includes installation of fence along Rattlesnake Hammock Road and adjoining entry features, 5-17 -07: Committee votes to commit $2,500 in consulting fees to McGee for project, McGee will bring recommendations to 6-21-07 regular meeting, 6-15-07: Project Complete (L-22) - COMPLETE (l'OC Darryl Richard)~ (PROJECT PRIORITY #4 AS PER 11-17-06 MEETING) Augusta Boulevard at Forest Hill Planting Project- SCHEDULE: Lely MSTU: Augusta at Forest Hill- Landscape & Irrigation PHASE Start - End Date Committee Approval for Hannula quote 4/19/2007 BCC APPR Not Required (105 K estimate by McGee) NTP CaNST 5/1l/2007 60 DA Y Substantial Completion 7/11/2007 90 DAY CONST 5111/2007-8/10/2007 CONST-COMPLETE 8110/2007 Status: Mike McGee has completed 100% plans for project; Presentation to Golf Course Management resulted in positive approval for project; Waiting on cost estimate from McGee & Associates, 5-30-06; Drawings dated 7/14/05 received from McGee; - Project will be scheduled for construction after phase II is completed. 7-18-06: Committee has placed project on hold until phase II completes. 8-22-06: Project is on hold with 100% plans approved by Golf Course and MSTU Committee, 2 161 '.. A ILL . 11-16-06: Committee reviewed plans and McGee provided cost estimate of $30,000,00 for total project. MSTU Commitment for project estimated by McGee as $15,000,00; Committee Action is required to move project forward, 12-14-06: MSTU Committee selects to include golf cart crossing area into project. 1-17 -07: Meeting with Golf Course Superintendent Allan Cooper to review project, 1-18-07: Golf Course Superintendent is reviewing project, Portion of project is outside of ROW, Portion of project outside of ROW requires Landscape Maintenance Agreement. One (I) Spare valve is available for use by the MSTU for project. 2-14-07 : Request for Quote sent out - deadline March 9ili, 2007 3-15-07: Committee to review quotes and select lowest quote, 4-10-07: Hannula is apparent low quote - Committee approval pending for $25,908,81 4-17-07: Committee approved for Hanula to do the job, 4-30-07: PO Request in process 5-11-07: Notice to Proceed sent to Hannula, Field meeting scheduled for May 22, 2007, Meetings to re-occur each week on Tuesday's (L-32)- COMPLETE -{pac: Tessie Sillery ); Refurbish entrance sign - damaged by fallen palm at St. Andrews Sign, 4-17 -07: Committee approved for Lykins PO to be opened to repair sign, Committee asked for more information on deflector plates, 5-17-07: Commitment from Lykins was to be complete by May 11,2007 inspection pending today's drive- through, 5-17-07: Project Complete (L-29) -COMPLETE -{POCo Tessie Sillery) - Median Re-Painting By Road & Bridge; As per Committee Request on 11-\6-06 Road & Bridge needs to paint "4" numbers at each median opening, 12-20-06: No action taken by Road & Bridge to date, Road & Bridge contacted pertaining Committee request to paint curbing, 2-14-07: Painting not done by Road & Bridge 3-15-07: R&B supervisor (Don) will meet with staff to make sure the location of #'s 4-17-07: Meeting with Road & Bridge crew to start project on April23, 2007 with Don Champlin, 4-30-07: Completed (L-30) - COMPLETE - (PaC Tessie Sille, y, Flag Pole Pole Maintenance - Committee requested staff to replace American Flag, 1-17-07: Facilities Maint. will replace flag today 1-18-07: Flags replaced 1-18-07: Committee requested for a different size flag 1-23-07 : Requested quote from Lykins 2-10-07: Single quotes and quotes for two for the committee to approve 2-15-07: Committee requested Tessie purchase flags through intemet 3-10-07: State Flag and American Flags purchased (2 of each) $187,00 3-15-07: Flags arrived today..,!!' 3-17-07: Flags installed - re-order will be on an as needed basis, County replacement flag is on order. (L-25) -COMPLETI' (POC Dan-yl Richard): (PROJECT PRIORITY #3 AS PER 11-17-06 MEETING) Pebble Beach Blvd, Golf Cart Crossing Area Improvements 10-19-06: Committee directs Committee Chairman Bob Slebodnik to meet with Golf Course to determine if project is agreeable to Golf Course Management for Construction, 11-17-06: Committee Approved McGee & Associates Concept Based on Foxtail Palm installation, McGee & Associates to provide one signed and sealed plan and one reproducible not signed and sealed, 12-18-06: Quote for $\0,801.94 received from Commercial Land Maintenance,- on hold until see below 12-18-06: Quote from CLM is approved for $10,801.94 under terms of annual contract. 3 161 A 14 ,~ 1-17-06: Staff notified that existing irrigation is insufficient for project. Altemative solutions under review by McGee, 2-15-07: Requirments for project are: (I) need 2 separate valves for irrigation on each side of road; (2) need confirmation of energized mainline 24 hrs a day; (3) need Golf Course to relocate existing irrigation heads; Bob Slebodnick will contact AI Cooper and schedule a meeting time for follow-up, 3-14-07: Golf Course installing irrigation - 50% complete 4-10-07: Project Complete (L-24) -COMPLETE! POC DaIry I Richard): - (PROJECT PRIORITY #2 AS PER 11-17-06 MEETING) DORAL CIRCLE LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND LIGHTING PROJECT - Need Committee Action for award of quote 6-15-06; Quotes received, issues with quotes and discrepancies identified, Committee requested that staffre-quote project with clarification concerning the discrepancies, 6-27-06: Waiting on quotes, 7-18-06: Need a &id-tab Schedule from McGee & Associates and electrical engineering 8-17 -06: Quotes from Annual Contractors for ElectricallnstallationJDesign is pending, 8-21-06: Meeting with Bernie Simmonds to answer questions regarding quote request. 8-21-06: Owner of Kent Technologies Thom Esch office visit. Thom receives updated copy of plans, 8-22-06: Quotes from Annual Contractors is pending, Due date is August 29, 2006, 8-31-06: Vendors contacted regarding quote: Kent confinns that they will quote, Simmonds will get back to staff on 9-1-06. 9-3-06: E.B. Simmonds Electrical quote received for $15,725,00 total electrical installation, Poles By County, 9-5-06; Bid Schedule revised and sent out, 10-19-06: Committee directs staff to obtain additional quotes, E,B, Simmonds quote rejected by Committee, Request for break-down of each line item from E,B, Simmonds, 10-30-06: E,8, Simmonds request meeting with Mike McGee and Staff to review project and quote, 11-7-06: E,B, Simmonds meets with Liaison Staff and reviews original quote, Project is re-quoted for $10,350,00 Committee Approval Required, 11-16-06: Lumec Sales Representative Ron Steedman confinns quote of$2,500 per light for a total of$5,000,OO Committee Approval Required, 11-17-06: Committee Approved E,B, Simmonds for $10,350,00; Approved $5,000,00 for Lumec; Approved $6,025,00 for Commercial Land Maintenance or other Contractor (ck with Purchasing), 12-20-06: Light Poles are on order, upon receipt E,8, Simmonds will begin electrical work, followed by Commercial Land Maintance installation of irrigation and landscaping, 1-17-07: Light poles are due to be delivered on March 2, 2007 pending, PO Issued to EB Simmonds for Electrical, PO Issued to CLM for landscape project; After receipt of light poles EB Simmonds will install. 3-9-07: Received Lumec Poles for project 3-14-07: Poles picked up by E8 Simmons 3-20-07: Electrical Installation Completed by E.B, Simmonds 4-10-07: Project Completed (L-32) - COMPLETE (POC Danyl Richard): Phase III Project: Refurbishment of Median #1 and #2 on St. Andrews at entrance to Lely off of US 41, 2-9-07: 100% plans received from McGee 2-15-07: eLM continns quote for $8,734.47 for project. 3-15-07: Project Completed (L-31) COMPLETE Coordination with Ted Weiner - LMA Agreement 1-13-07: Letter from Ted Weiner - received and forwarded to Scott Teach 2-15-07: No official confmnation received from Weiner that they are baking out ofLMA, Weiner had discussion with MSTU Committee Chair and requested assistance with Code Enforcement item, No further action is required on this item. 4 161 A 14 (L-23) ...(:OMPLETE - (Darryl) - (FDOT) (PROJECT PRIORITY #1 AS PER 11-17-06 MEETING) Lely Phase ll-Landscape and Irrigation; Final 100% Design Approved by FDOT; Permit received from Bryan Dennis FDOT; Waiting on Notice to Proceed from FOOT (requires checklist approval); Checklist has been submitted to FDOT for approval. 5-1-06; FDOT Notice to Proceed is pending, Checklist has been approved, 5-15-06; Notice to proceed still pending, checklist has been approved, 5-30-06; FOOT NTP and drawings delivered to purchasing - pending advertisement from purchasing, 6-5-06: Contract Letting by Purchasing, Bids due by 6-30-06; BCC Approval for 7-25-06 meeting (Novus Deadline of7-10-06) 6-12-06: Bids are due June 30, 2006 - bee 7-25-06 6-15-06; Pre-Bid Meeting on June 20, 2006 6-27-06; Addendum # I - in progress, 7-18-06; BCC to award bid to Vila & Sons -7-25-06 7-25-06: BCC Approved Vila & Son Contract 8-17-06: Purchasing reports that Vila & Sons is completing paperwork for FDOT portion of contract and will return it back to Purchasing prior to issue of Contract/Purchase Order. 8-22-06: Vila & Sons to return paperwork to purchasing and anticipate availability for project within 2 weeks, Signed contract from Purchasing/County Attorney Office is pending, NTP is anticipated on September 5, 2006, 9-1-06: Contract sent to County Attorney Office for signature by Brenda Brilhart, 9-5-06: Conversation with Kay Nell indicates that Colleen Green is assigned to review contract. She suggests a follow-up call in 48 hours for confirmation of approval. 9-19-06: Notice to Proceed for Vila & Son; project begins: September 19,2006 with 90 day contract period ending December 18, 2006, 11-6-06: Vila & Son Pay Application # I reviewed and rejected due to non-completion of' Preparation for Planting' line item, Pay Application will be sent back to contractor for revision, 11-7 -06: Revised pay application approved for payment. Project is 57 % completed, 1-17-07: Substantial Completion Inspection; Punch-List Complete for outstanding items, Present were: Philip Thibeaux, Vila & Son; Danyl Richard, A TM Liaison; and Mike McGee, McGee & Associates; Roger Dick, Irrigation Project Manager. 2-21-07: Confirmation Final Close-out change order is processed (CO #2), (L-26) - COMPLE'I E - Order for new Sign - Pebble Beach Median #19 8-17-06: Lely MSTU Committee requested that Staff have Lykins provide quote for downed sign at median #19 Pebble Beach Drive, 8-31-06: Staff request that Lykins provide quote for issue of PO, 9-8-06: Quote Received, but committee did not approve the amount. - Only to get a quote. 10-9-06: Staff requires Lely MSTU Committee approval for this item in order to proceed, 10-19-06: Committee review of item, Consensus is that item is not an MSTU Project and is the concern of the Lely Civic Association (HOA), The sign was originally installed by the HOA, (L-28) - COMPLETE - PEBBLE BEACH OVERPASS PROJECT -Road & Bridge to reconstruct asphalt on overpass, No confirmation of schedule from R& Bas of today - 3-6-06 and as of 5-15-06 5-30-06; Stormwater Director (Calvert) is working on project estimate and scope, To be complete within 2 weeks, 7-18-06: Jerry Kurtz reports project is not funded this fiscal year and there are no immediate project needs, 8-17-06: Lely MSTU Committee request review of project and reconsideration for project schedule, 8-18-06: Eugene Calvert sends email indicating that the project is not scheduled/funded by Stormwater, 8-22-06: Committee has requested review of previous determination by Stormwater that the project does not warrant action by Storm water. A TM Liaison Staff has set up a meeting on August 24, 2006 at 1 :00 PM to discuss, 8-24-06: Staff meets with Committee Chairman Bob Slebodnik to review project, 9-1-06: RLS sent to Scott Teach to confmn that the MSTU can fund 50% of$65,000,OO project; Stormwater Dept. would fund other 50%, 9-11-06: RLS response by Scott Teach indicates that the MSTU cannot fund the project, Pending Committee action to cancel project, the project cannot be funded by MSTU funds. 10-19-06: As per County Attorney's review and response project is determined to be a 'non-MSTU' Project and falls outside of the authorization as per Current MSTU Ordinance, 5 r "M 14 (L-25) ~ COMPLETE-Pending Committce Action - PALM TREE REPLACEMENT - MCGEE recommendations pending as per committee request, Committee is interested in Foxtail Palms, - 7/18/06: McGee provided quote and committee waiting for phase II before proceeding with project. 8-17-06: McGee formal written proposal is pending, 8-17-06: Staff requests a formal written proposal from McGee & Associates at MSTU Meeting, 8-22-06: Written Proposal from McGee is pending, 9-11-06: Anticipated delivery date 9-30-06 10-19-06: McGee provides cost estimate with recommendations for Committee, Committee Action is required to proceed with Project. (L-27) ~ COMPLETE - Order for new Sign at Entrance Lely MSTU US 41 at St. Andrews; Lykins quote for $760,00 approved by Committee on July 20, 2006, 7-24-06: Staff request to purchase for Lykins in the amount of$760.00 8-17-06: Lykins installation of sign pending, 8-22-06: PO issued to Lykins for installation of sign, Installation to be complete by 2" week Sept. 8-31-06: Proof will be forwarded to Staff on 9-1-06 for review, 9-7-06; Darryl approved the proof, 9-22-06: Lykins begins installation of sign, 10-1-06: Lykins installation complete (L-21) COMPLETE - Flag lighting ~ not working, ~ Anticipated completion date - September 30", 2006 8-17-06; Eb Simmonds contacted for lighting and flagpoles and took care of problem under contract ~ no fee charged 10-10-06: Lights reported 100% operational by Committee Chairman (L-I) ~ COMPLETE- Spraying of Exotic vegetation at St. Andrews Canal -Travis Gossard contacted regarding request for re-spraying of exotics, 8-22-06: Danny Dominguez confirms that the re-spraying of the Canal has taken place, (L -2) - COMPl.FTF--Painting of Curbs and Yellow Paint at Median Tips 6-15-06; Estimate for work approved minus purchase of material (paint), Staff to obtain material separate to Commercial Land Maintenance proposal. 6-23-06: Requested Gerald Morris to let us know ~ R&B painting schedule and paint in stock? 7-6-06: Gerald emailed giving us an update on their painting schedule and asked J,Vliet to respond to us, 7-18-06; Spoke to John Vliet and he stated to make sure to use FDOT standards on paint and not to change anything. Just repaint. 7-18-06; Will purchase paint at Sherwin Williams and provide to CLM, 7-20-06: Paint and materials dropped off to CLM 8-15-06: CLM performing painting, curbs completed, painting of numbers not complete 8-22-06: Project is completed, (L-3) -COMPU':I'E -Sign Plantings of Crown of Thorn (Augusta at Forest Hill) - CLM directed to plant crown of thorn at existing sign on July 20, 2006, 8-14-06: Inspection indicated that plantings had not occurred CLM contacted. 8-22-06: Plantings of Crown of Thorn is completed, (L-4) ("aMPLE rE- Solar lighting - HOA Project - Augusta Boulevard at Forest Hill Sign Lighting Project- HOA to fund installation, MSTU to pay for Yo of construction cost. 5-15-06: Pending Purchasing approval 5-30-06: Kent Tech is revising their estimate as per contract. 6-12-06: Kent tech has provided requested quote, item being processed by Finance/Purchasing 6 16' A 14 (L-5) -COMPLETE-Lely Phase II- (Electrical & Lighting & Irrigation Controllers): - Construction Cost: EB Simmonds Cost $23,010.00; Lumec Cost $17,050,00 ($1,550 per pole will poles) ~Total Project $40,060,00, E,B, Simmonds is complete, FPL to power up Meter-pending, 5-1-06; FPL and EB Simmonds work complete, (L-6) COMPLETE-Potable Water Meter Removal (L 7) -COMPLETE-Repair of Asphalt on Forest Hill - COMPLETE; Andy Vanisak, Road & Bridge, performed repairs to the area at no cost to the MSTU; Initial Repair Complete (L-S) Flag Replacement- COMPLETU)-Flag Order for poles at St. Andrews and US 41 6-15-06; as per committee request the flags will be ordered twice a year or "as needed" (L-9) -COMPLETE-Lely Phase 1- Complete (3/1/05)- COMPLETED (L-l0) -COMPLETE-Drainage Project -Pebble Beach Road- Non-MSTU Project (L-ll) -COMPLETE-Drainage Project -St. Andrews Boulevard-Embankment Cleaning- 100% (L-12) COMPLETE-Baltusrol Culvert Inlet Clean-Out 5-12-06; Project Competed by Commercial Land Maintenance (1,-13) -COMPLETE-Baltusrol Overpass Asphalt Repair - at the request of the Committee Chairman Road & Bridge performed the repair. 3-10-06; Project Completed by Road & Bridge (L-14) -COM PI, ETE-Baltusrol Tree near lift station; Committee requested staff investigate weather the tree identified near the existing lift station was the responsibility of the MSTU to maintain as it was severely damaged by Hurricane Wilma, had been subsequently removed by others, and a huge stump remained. 2-2-06; Investigation by Staff concludes that the tree stump is outside of the Right of way on Baltusrol and that the tree is either on Golf Course Property or Lot owner at Lot 133 Baltusrol. (L-15) COMPLETE- "Pinehurst Estates" Sign Area on Baltusrol Landscape Project; Refurbishment Project to address the non-planted areas around the existing signs for the entrance into Pinehurst Estates-Lely MSTU Area, 5-5-06; Project Completed by Commercial Land Maintenance, (L-16) COMPLETE-Doral Circle: Pepper Tree Removal 6-1-06: Road & Bridge Contacted concerning the removal of pepper tree within County Right of Way, 6-15-06; Pepper Tree reported removed (L-17) -COMPLETE-Doral Circle Sign Lighting Project 3-15-06Project Completed by Kent Technologies under contract with Lely MSTU, (L-lS) -COMPLETE-Doral Circle Bench Area Refurbishment Project. Committee directed staff to obtain quotes for Commercial Land Maintenance to pressure clean pavers and apply protective sealant, replace decking on benches, and reset shrubs in planted beds, 2-10-06; Project reported complete by Commercial Land Maintenance, (L-19) - On Hold- Phase II Project; Advanced Bench Order and Installation; As per Committee request quote was requested of Commercial Land Maintenance for the installation of benches to include storage, The order for the benches was on hold due to the storage issue, As per the Bid Letting on June 5, 2006 and following Pre-Bid meeting the benches are to be included in the bid for Phase II Project as an alternate, (L-20) - COMPl.ETE -FLAG POLE REPLACEMENT- 7 16/ A 14 a, Received Quotes from annual contractors and other vendors, Lykens Sign Tech was low quote, Purchasing recommended Lykens Sign Tech, committee cancelled project, b, Committee has requested CLM to demolition existing poles and bases as per annual contract rates not to exceed $2,500,00 after demolition, quotes will be requested from Sign Companies, 5-1-06; PO issue is pending as per Committee Approval. 5-15-06; Sign Craft received NTP on 5-12-06 and waiting on material order - drawing prepared,- 3 weeks estimated for poles to be received, 6-12-06: flag poles to arrive within I week... On site meeting with contract to confirm locations, 6-15-06; Flag poles and all materials received by contractor; Installation to begin upon receipt of Permit from Collier County Sign Permitting, 6-27 -06 : to be installed by June 30'h pending CDS review of construction pad 7-3-06: Flag Poles are up with flags, For 4th of July..!!!! 8 trl, II ..[ (, 14 .. 'I , AG.TRONIX SPECIAUIING IN MOTORQLA IRRIGATION CONTRQL SYSiEMS 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239-657-5519 QUOTATION/PROPOSAL DATE QUOTE NO, 10/22/2007 815 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOA TMfTransportation 2885 Horsesooe Drive South Naples, H 34104 TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SLT ITEM DESCRIPTION aT'! PRICE TOTAL 12~ S-':OflllO ~C 16 ~[anon \\IRadlo In Sramle~s Sled Enclosure F284SA : \ IHF(451'-nlMllz, SCUrplO ~(' 2m Suut" tlT7'-;U 2 1.325.00 2,650,00 I rLN2154A Radio Scorpio AC un Expill1sion Kit 2 225.00 450,00 I F2805A Scorpio V2 AC :2 ini8 out 2 800,00 1.600,00 800-0365 12v Power Supply LDASOF 4.3mnp 2 100,00 200,00 800-7106 H~IN-5 AC Powel 'able 2 0,00 0,00 SOO-711 \ ' H~OU-9 DC Power Cal~le 2 0,00 0,00 SB-18SS SS Enclosure 18W X 36H X 11D 2 1.290,00 2.580.00 PED-ISSS SSPedestals 18\VX 12HX 10D 2 375.00 750.00 :VILB-S-AC Surge Protector AC liD/Sout 4 266.50 L066,OO X5836 Low Profile Ant UHF 450-470 tvlllZ 2 90,00 180,00 51020-WM Ll;;::vitOll Surge Protection 2 189,00 378,00 8299-A W (iF! W/Switch Leviron (15Amp) 2 39.00 78,00 ]-11 Single Gang Box 2 3.99 7.98 Thilllk you for jOur business. TOTAL $9.939,98 QCOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS, SIGNATURE 161 A 14 AG~TRONIX SPECIAUIING IN MOTO~LA IRRIGATION CONTROL SmEMS 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239-657-5519 QUOTATION/PROPOSAL DATE QUOTE NO, 10/22/2007 S16 CUSTOMER NAME Collier Cmillry DOA TMITransportation 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples. Fl. 34104 TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT :.Jet 30 SLl ITEN! DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL I F2948A I MLB,S- DC ~4962 I-Scorpio DC 8 Station \v,iRadio in Green Steel Powder Coated Enclosure , ,,-SO)2 Enclosure wiHood. bru.:kpaneL wi20\V Solar Paneli UHF I 1,9S0'OOl 1.9S0,OO !710-1300 Antenna, Wi!VloLltlting Template 12v Battery (25AHl SealeJ 1 89,00 SQOO , I I I I Note: This enc1amre 11a<; solar panel huilt Inside. I I 1 It's been a pleasure working with you! TOTAL $3,no.oo UHF(450-470r-Hh) Scorpio DC 21N/80UT Surge Protector DC :2 INiS OUT Sunsaver 6 Voltage Regulator I II :\ \360.00 241.00 50,00 1.360,00 24 LOa 50,\l0 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS, SIGNATURE AG~TRONIX SPECIAUIING IN MOTOROLA IRRIGATION CONTROL SYSTEMS 1304 N, 15th STREET IMNfOKALEE, FL. 34142 239-657-5519 161 A 14 QUOl A liON/PROPOSAL DATE QUOTE NO, 10/22/2007 817 CUSTOMER NAME Collier COMty DOA TMfTransportation 2885 Horseshoe Drive South 'Japles. FI. 34104 TERMS REP SHIP VIA ?ROJECT Net 30 SU ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL l~Scorpio CC g StaUl\O \viRadio in Stainiess Steel Enclosure 1'2948,1 I L'HFl450-470MI-tzJ SCllrpiu DC 2JN/80UT 1 1.360,00 1.360,00 MLB-8-DC SUf2:C Protector DC 2 L'J/S OUT 11 :~LOO I 241.00 34962 I Sl.lll-saver 6 Voltage Regulator I II ,0,00 50.01} SB- I 8SS I 5S Enclosure 18\V X 36[-[ X 12D Ii 1,290.001 J,290,OO \ PED- 18SS SS Pcdesrais 18\V ~\ 2JJX IOj) I I' 375,00 \ 375.on BSP2012 20Wart Solar P,illd :1 219.00 219,00 SPB~m Solar Pm-lei Brack0t \ 55.00, 55,00 85836 i Low Protile .J..nt UHF 450-470 1\111-1] I 90,00 90,00 710- I 3110 ! ] lv Battery (25 AI-!) Sealed 1 89,00 89,()1l I Collier COllnty standard cabinct wi solur panel mount , It's been a pleasure working with you! TOTAL $3,769,IlO QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS, SIGNATURE 161 A 14 ,"'" II Commercial Land Maintenance Full Service Landscape Management . u,/~~. ,NO. ,._,....~^.~~- '," 3980 Exchange Ave. . Naples, FL 34104 Office: (239) 643.6205 . Fax: (239) 643.5012 E-mail: commland@aol.com CUSTOMER NO, BILL TO: _'.."c:. ,....>J.....,i,l,..v ~,t..,;~4.. ti, ,i ".d..,.;,). c..; ,~..,....,....;;.. . , .,..-1 ' 'j .'-'....J..'.'. ...,.."..,-.' ;.., I. i',i'<....!, "__'~,,,"_, J>../I,"'L,._JII.I\:J I\HLU,j'.;,';', i UL.'" I '" \J:".' \~, .J-I ;.'-'i ". L""..J____.',; ,-',;,-" ;; ;...,,-(1: ,_,.f,:.;)";. ....,,'11 ;;~. '.... .--!'-....'.... h\,.~'p C".". ;L','.J ..;(.U;.i.l..; \...:..J.,.;L,'v dU", ii\;:.tll..ji. .'~' .",'l..U" 'i.-,"""" -j jG.~;, i .:?u (_~.:. ~>..i _ -..H i'.>l .i ,,-,( ~.;, ",",; 'il ..' -I; , .:.::).~, '.~)':""~-J ..:..8 nu.J;"v(, i 1,.;;'::'; ii 1;<';;:_.\, JUl)',;.;l ';1 _",}l~;; C'J ,iL;l,.j; ;i\~ J.jUlJ/;,''':i h ...........'t ~_'.r~' .u<- 'J ,/, lllWiti'_" 1..l..II, liLhJr L-:.,,1'-"1 tV \l~,->l_..il ~'U '...1'-_, ~ \~~ ~\ TOTAL .,"" ~_"i, l .. J, , THANK VOU' WE APPRECIATE 1'0UR BUSINESS PLEASE NOTE PAI'MENTTERMS ON REVERSE SIDE 1,5'7, WILL BE ADDED MONTHLl' TO AU INVOICES OVER 30 DA)'S UNTIL PAID 161 A 1b ....". 1m Commercial Land Maintenance Full Service Landscape Management ,NO. I" i i i\/ ' - ,~. 3980 Exchange AVe. . Naples. FL 34104 Office: (239) 643-6205 . Fax: (239) 643-5012 E-mail: commland@aol.com CUSTOMER NO, BILL TO: "-rU"if.(,;. ,.,,,,'-Jilt.)' 'i. . ~ ,',\1 ;;~lc,',.)t i ,1,__" J~ j ...., '" ~ .- ;',.,l..h~ :ii ..... .., '......d .'--"',. .,.'.,;....:i\L_v,;..j;. .'... Lt_"","" r,;: _,_;iH!\;. ,,";, ,;1.....',,,1 i ...:J '::'Ui-.:";;;l\',...,i I..d} '_'I iij. i'~ ,,'J',-'._ ,:'<i '_~'!,~)'<;i1,~<;k.. ',Jil\i ,i..llJjj", ;;jL\fd; :;"I.\Yi ":'.Ut;'" , ido.:.li",HI' .-:!\'~il:i,' i,-.:F~j (.l,',: Ifl\:J'i lid',,'\.:, '.. ...."... . .;jji",(..';\.l,. ,.";'I"U..,.,j . I.H,'"", <_ ","'....'''''. L I -.r. _j~ ~'.)LH l,v ~_,-~;, -1(.:.(; 1,_, ;- . 'd,;.;,c;,'id; '..' ,',,1 )1;. ~l~t;.. 1 ,'_'U<_'.w :Iv.l,l'i ,\(.j~,_ ,"'. ..j''''''''_.Lh '._', :,jG,i.~\..".il. '."."i,-" ..:-'., .'.'1.., .. ,~! ;;',... 1;..."'.,'.>1....." 'C"J ~. .i, i.J K t \\\ t\ dl TOTAL ~.., " . . ; THANK rou' WE APPRECIATE !'OUR BUSINESS PLEASE NOTE PAYMENT TERMS ON REVERSE SIDE 1,5% WILL BE ADDED MONTHLY TO ALL INVOICES OVER 30 DAYS UN71L PAID m BILL TO: 161 A 14 Commercial Land Maintenance Full Service Landscape Management NO. ,,:1,....' 3980 Exchange Ave. . Naples, FL 34104 Offfce: (239) 643.6205 . Fax: (239) 643-5012 E-mail: commfand@aol.com CUSTOMER NO, ",.,~",-- - <:.-. ., _.-, , /; l. "_',/:;:,\..:;1,, .<.. .' ..;;~ ,_' i. 'Jh:' '-" i'~i . j ;1.dli " \.(:.,. , ,'., '~. '-~ , ." '",:"" -;;A \ ~,U~ii ,J...'.0" .JJ.Li;..J ~/ ~\f TOTAL :.1 THANK l'OU' WE APPRECIATE YOUR BUSINESS PlEASE NOTE PAYMENT TERMS ON REVERSE SIDE 1,5'7< WILL BE ,IDDED MONTHLY TO ALL INVOICES OVER 30 DAIS UNTIL PAID 161 A 14 q~4J~\~Lj P.O. BOX 280196 . TAMPA, FL 33682 239-597-9500 . FAX: 813-949-2540 E-mail: mail@floridaplay.com j\n/0'"!\V,,:-::ai(:{~':,~av!':sa..~:cm TO: Collier Co. Transportation Dept. - ATM 2885 Horseshoe Dr, S Naples, FL 34104 239-252-5840 Fax: 239-530-6219 Other Office Locations: Naples, Gainesville. Orlando, Palm Beach Lely MSTU QUOTATION # 11115 Playground Equipment, Site Furnishings, Bleachers & Shade Struc1ures Altn: Tessie Sillery tessiesi Ilery@colliergov,net Date: November 15, 2007 Shlo Date: Approx: 4-6 Weeks ARO Terms: Net 15 Davs F.O.B.: Destination Salescerson: Dan Swartz 597-9500 Sl1looed Via: CC Quantitv Descriction I Unit Price Total : DuMor I 1 #143-60PL 6' Recycled Plastic Bench wi Cast Iron Supports :$ 684,00 $ 684,00 (Redwood Plastic wi Black Frame) I Less 5% Discount (per Citrus County S,8, Bid#2006-41) $ (34,20) $ 649,80 I Shipping & Handling $ 144,00, TOT AL PR~C:: $ 793.80 . I I I I I I Price based on Citrus Co, S,B, Bid #2006-41 i I Price does not include off-loading, assembly or installation, I : I Price valid tor 30 days. I ; Thank you, -l~~-llJJlJJ-l-lO~Oo~o~crS:OOZ:2:morZoom~oZ-loo-l~-l~ZOO Omm~CC~~:l> ~-lm-l~Q~C~oo:l>r-l~OCZ m~:l>:l> ~m-lmc ~oooo:l>OO:l>~~~mI~IZIar~C-l~Ia-~Q~Q~~~z~<mr~ ~~~ffiffiffiffiffi~o~~I~~~oo~~~~~~oo~~~~~oo~~oooo~~~~ m<<~-l-l~-lr~~oms:~B~ rz oOo~ml ~~~~~coo< c::mm~-l-l~Oos:z~~_u, mo~Qo~-lzoo rn~oo~~m-l:l>:;:; gOO~o~~oo~cmQmlJJ~:l>s:;ll ;omo::;1zmOQo '.-loo;O;O~~~-lrr !!l ~o~~ ~~zm~~ma~s: ~Qoo ~zg~~z;o~~~;o~~?<~~ oZoooo c~~~~mFo~~ oo~~ :l>o-lmmc::mo;o~OOComm o~-l:l> ~ Qmzs:~~mm ~m< oo~oo;om<oooS:S:~oS:s: z o~ z mZQ ZlJJZ~ s:~~ ~m~ zOQ-l:l>cr-l-l -l o~ 0 zOO m_:l>- :l> ZS: -l :l>~~r:l>?< O~ 0 m Ozz:l> ~r:l>~ ;o~mx~ mx Z coor ~ r~lJJ lJJ-mzo;omo ~ r ~ 00 mOO ~ Fe ~ 0 ~ ~~~~~t:f::~~t&~~1;ltt 161 A N N N N N ~ - - - - - - - . W N _ 0 ~ m ~ ~ ~ . W N . . . .. G m ~ ~ ~ . W N - ~~~~~~~~~~Q~~~M~~~~~~~W~~W fRtltEflEflEflEflEfl ""I> "'all> ""c3 o 0. CD ~ " oCDo. o_~ o o .... "''''~ ............ 1'.)1\)......'" (J'I(1ICOOlNNN............m -Ilo-(J) mmoco~1.nu.1.n1.ni:D......oo ooooooogoc.nooo oeOOOOO 00000 0000000000000 0000000000000 ..,,'" oo>N" mm.......O'I-...J O1omoo..oooo:':' 00000000000 00000000000 660.06606000 00000000000 N N ..........0 0 -....I we>> -...J oo.u.-......OJco O'l 0,"010 !=" 0000 0",,0000 0010.,909 '" .." o ~ o o o o Efl fR 4:Jl W fR Efl Efl tit (:fl fFl (jl 'J) j) ';! ',J.! I.. '/. ;'"1 (,) ,',iI " 'j) VI fi' ('1 .... W Efl W Efl W -ER -M fREflEflEflWfREflW_~EflWEflWEflEflEflEflEflWWWEflWEfl4:Jl_EflEflEflEflEflEflW4:JlWEflm )( _ _CD:l> ~w_.!" ......::::J n f\.)w,J:t. --::::.-......9:2' ~~g;o8~t!!.. . . . . . . ... WN-...I-...JCOOCD NCOOO>O"'U. --- -- ~ "' ,'.... 0 , , co ~, C) W :,-) n i' 0' ") ,j) . ~) en " .. I: ... ... .. '" o ... N I I Q .. '" '" "''''''' <0"'0> e,.,,,,~ "'0>'" ;'}J c-. -- ()) " " en ;" (-', co, " ~2 D '" 0> '" '" '" '" ~ N,J:l..~N OtO-..J-..J .tlo.OCOc.n i:nw~~ Q)NWN .. ~ l!l W -0> ~ .." en 53 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_~~~~~~~~w~ ... .....~~ ..."'''' Qlmm ,",00 11I00 000 "00 "'''' I\,)I\,)~~C:O "',...,............0'1 (.n<.n(.nu,O,...... 8ggg~g OOOOWO OOOomo "'O>~ .~-..Jm ~...O> 0""'" i:>>~i\J 0>"'''' '" o o o o o ~ ~ 00> am 00 00 00 00 "'~ - 0I(J'l......c.n........,I:lo.-..J .Jlo.-:....,<.noo~coo O<OOOOOc.nO OO'lCOOQOOO 6~i:no66:"""6 O.Jlo.(x)OOO~O I_I\:) 'i\3 - >- ......~ 0 m ~-4Q1 (.oJ 0'1 ...... W:--J en 0 -. .c.>><.n:....ootof.vw-..J ......-:.:a.litii' .....OW(J10COW.Jlo. o.$:lo.-a" P'!=,"'!='~~9~9~:'-' i" .....O.Jlo.OO(,.)NW-..JCOCO 00909N0)8mo~ ~~'5:S:~~~ooo< <a()Q)"'U~OOQ.(DCD ~(J) C)::J reD ::!.3 =Q.:J ......omO U1Q.3CD-:Q. - C ro m - m .... en CD 5".... :::J -<_(1)(1 "'" oORo "'00 Z -t' CD >- :;tJ~. -. C Q) o (/I mm~::J 3 ..... eft o!:!". r.;t CD )> g ~g~c r- ~ o.~ ~;:;,~g>m~.g>~~~iO :::J;:a.:J 0 ~ 5..::.!.::J a::J 31 o=a.....;:.+O:Jo..('D:::!: _ CD N" rn CD :::!. ~ ~ (J) ....::J ~ (f)~2~Q. ro@QofO :0 c a -.-< ...."'C 0 < s~ s,:mg> . CD '.0 en ~. s: ~ en '< CD :::JWCD :2 r+~.... "" , {; l' "" , " " :0 n , < co :; ,-:0 N >-.~ :c. " .:::~ '0 ,-, .~) ex> , '-:") 'n C1 ~ d 00 en en , ,'S f;., (.J '" W '::) ~ 0 , J', , " ~ '" ::) 0 ~.:J '" on .:")) 0 r) .fIt{;A.~ '-f) tfltfltfltfltfltfl tR > 'tin ..- -. c o.!!!. '" o ... N o '" .." 0'" "'0 "'~ '" '" "'0> "'... 0><0 "'0 ww "'''' ",,,,0 o 3 3 g CD " Ii!" 14. z o < CD 3 CT CD .. .... JJ1 '" o o ~ "fir c~ Z-( Os:: ....CJ) U1-i "'c ~~ ()Ol:E-ltll O::J;::;:O~ ::JO-:::Tacn ::J 0 -. m CD 0 7 c..n m ~ ti ::J.~_ ~o""~NO Q)..., 1_ CD~-o ""0 AI ~. CD::O AI ~m(/)~C5 ~~~~~ N~m""O::! g~Cil~O CD ;::;:co 0 Z . :::Tc:"'" -l _o~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~m ::J '< ..., 0 Q.Q.Q)""OAI 5.~5.;o> <D:Exxl;; ~mJ...en -roo~ -0 ..., ~ ffi" -C. 5" Ul Ul 5" Q- ::T 0> co 0 c: = m7"""O 000 ~ =1:'0 '" a. ' ~<DC ~<'O & o. (/) <D'O 0~D3 <D ' '< xCll;;r en. en CD !::!:-im ::J::J0. COo 0' O'l:lo c: -.9- O'<D- Q:", <D -, ~ ~ -i o -i )> ~ > Z C Ul o )> -0 m Il" iii ;u -Ul Clc ~g os. Z!!!. tIlUl )>CD Ulll m ci' ~ tIl:l 0 0:0 :;' ~ ... o "'''' ~ ~ ~ ~ o C:o 00 0000 0090 "'00 000 ~~~~~ ~~ S:CIlClltllIUl;U~ C&.&.om:{.Qo r cB3c(I)O- OtD.,;m CD C"-'< :r:~05"5J.g~ mQriil~-o-m.m c: mmQ)(i)...,cr f3 3Q)<DaJg~ .:< -ci)~c-."" -0 _.- :JJD@ C 3=Dg.:!!m '" 0 :E 0 OJ- to ffim~;o~ CD ~=1....0>< ::J _"T1 '< m a. war 0)-- ~ co cr ""0 ""0 m c: m m ~!!l- 33 o;w I\.)~ =co 0 ~ Ol ,- 0 ;?; - I\.) m "'!' ~~ o:r: ~ ~ m- C <D '0 g '" o c "" 0' Ol co '" ~;;r o '- , '" 0'0 , " c..n~~ ~ 0000l1\.) 000-.10> tIlUlCllmm Q)".mBl co ~ ~. '" -E,B-E,B-E,Biflt.4 Ul C 0- ,... o [ Ul CD " ,... O.c..nOOCDCD :J o:""'wC:.nC:.n =0001\.)00 t.4t.4t.4t.4t.4t.4 00 '" ~ OOl ~Ol~ OOO-.lI\.).,I:l.CD 009N!=O~:--J OlOOOc..nO 000000 ~ o o I.... ,-0 ...0 qfJ o o -0 -0- ~ .,::!;!)> -OlZ 3::J-i III ~ c:!I: :1, )> ~-i ~m 0' ;u m ;;: ~ Oul :;' o E a. <D 0' Ol o ,,- ~ ~ "'0 mm Ol Ol "'''' .... '" 0'" 0'" 00 00 "'''' ~ '" -~ f.J 0'" 99 00 00 161 Ol ::J a. 0- ~ ~:-cnc , CD ., ~;; ;U'U-_'" CD...,-Ig~ 3<Dm ... '0 -- OBlOmC= <mm-.- Ol !l:CLCl o~"O;:; .... -<Dr-CD CD _ - 3 xo-i en"..., -- !:!:-o 0 ::J -ZCD co ~ . -0 !::!: ""'0 n or::J AI:3. ::J co m" _Ul""'O!:t. '" -)> 0 :C~AI:::I <D ~ )> ~ ::J -i ::J 0 _ ~roO m _Ul Z ~""Q.):Io _OlZ ~ ~ 0 "'OlC OJ=:>- ::J a. 0.--0 oQo ~ '" '" '0 )> ~~r- 0=4; ::1i o. o Ol Q)!:: !::!:o o ::J ::J '" ~- '0 iil :a :;' co '" g 3 x' '0 ~ '" '0 <D o =;; o' OJ ~ 6' ::J ~ ... o o o ~ " '" ul c ~ [ ul CD " =:0 0' :I'" o "'''' ~ ~ -", '" 00 99 00 00 A14 C o ~ ~ o iii o ~ m Z o ~ :J:~ tIlm c~ ,,-< "Cl mO ;u~ ~" )>m Zul C-i ul)> O-i )>m -oul m- 1l"!I: _ul ;u-i ;UC i5 ~ o Z ;u m Z o ;; -i o Z o C :I ::;: C :I ::;: o o III ,... C CD III cD. :I -0 ~ o ;' III III o. :I !!!. Ill. o " S' o. :I 9, o o III ,... .... o ![ o o .. - ~ 00 '" CD " n o 0 aD1 <" ~ '" CD 00 g 0 " = CD ~ co!. "CD '" " ::J CD " = '" n OlCD ;:l: 'C '" , ::J o CD .(Jl "Q iil ::J (Jl III ::J a. 0- , (Jl "Q '" " ~ 0' !!t 6' ::J .e r; z o en o > ~!!! llOiil -3: ;u> ~-l C'lm !i~ iS~ zen -l-l-len OOoc -4-1-1st >>>!l. r-r-r-A>> mmmcn >>>CD enenenn .." mmm~~ mmmO 0 ___::I 000=0 "H" '" ~ ~....lI.O<OW ~....lI.VJ"""""'" ...... 0 -....... (,.) 01 <000000 VJQ)(1'lOO 0,0,000 00000 '" o o r " '" ~ en O;u-;:;:;~ CD CD ~ m o i>> a. Q _. c: 3: ~=.~.)> -.::s --..... ~ a:a ~ ~ m:e 0'- '" Dl '" > te=(f)r- '" III en 3 m III ::J ![ CD 6' " '" ;u '" 6i S' S co ~ ~ 'C ~ ::J o CD !" "Q iil ::J (Jl III ::J a. Q (Jl "Q '" " ~ 0' !!t 6' ::J .e ~ o o *' (Jl c: "Q 'Q. iii' a. I/<> CD '" o m " '" Ol ?' o o '" '" .CD <Xl o o o o 161 - o , ....lI.~(I)C , CD Dl ~S' m;u'U--'" oco...,-tg.....a. =3.g m_~ l'DoQ)ODJ~ ~~mm-a.- "'_ 3: 0 ~o~O.."'" --mr-CD 1(1)_-3 -(~.Q-- .g gJ,lE 00 U)::lmZCD o co = (II =-0 _" n en Di"~ ^'~. C ::l ..., m :gur::J"'Og =_ 0 > = '" "Q CD ;u O-CDw)> Qo ....., - .... ::J"Q _ 5'!2.iilO en CD::l Z m!ll (I) ;;C"Q III >z ,. -::J a.~e:c (/) Q c mw(i) a -0 "'0 -"'0 0" ..., =h UI 0')> -g~r- " 0 =+;::l o'~ III ~ 6' ::J .e '" III S' (Jl ![ ro a. "Q i3 a. c: n. "Q '" , "Q iil ::J (Jl I/<> (Jl "Q '" " ~ 0' III ~ 6 ::J .e .... o 010 "'0 om ~'n "'''' en C ~ - !!!. en CD nw -..,,~ o' 0 0 =00 '" '" '" Ol"'.... ~-.c:a.o 000 "''''0 000 000 A 14 o o ~ .... o ;ij o .... m z o ;u -l :I:.... mm c:.... ,,-< "C'l mO ;u.... r;-n zm oen en-l o!i >m "'llen m- 1lO3: _en ;u-l ;uC: 15 > -l is z ;u m z o < !i is z o c: = ;::;: c: = ;::;: o CD .. ciS' = "'ll a ;' .. .. 0' = !!!. ..- o "Q oj" 0' = o - o o .. ~ o o .. - .... o [ o ~ ~ RECEIVED IAN 'l II 2008 10 r A f5- c_ f~,Y'i"! J' COLLIER COUNTY LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD :"lOnN ,;o,,,,,,,ss,,,ous Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 9:30 a.m. Headquarters Library AGENDA Fiala Jl\.hv ~ Halas './ ~______ Henni ng_~_J7____,_____, Coyle -:7 -ktr1 Pc- Coletta .~~-- Call to order Approval of Minutes Literacy Program Report Report of Officers Communications a - Written b ., Personal Unfinished Business 1. Employee ofthe Month - Jan '08 2. Golden Gate Library construction 3. South Regional Library construction 4. ENNB Closing Controversy New Business General Considerations Director's Report Report of the Friends Adjournment Mise, Comls I ~ I (t \ &) Date: Item#: COPies to: j 16/ If 11) Naples, Florida, December 12,2007 LET IT BE KNOWN that the LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD met on this date in regular session at 9:30 a.m, in the Main Library with the following members present: CHAIR: Doris 1. Lewis VICE-CHAIR: Loretta Murray Karen Louwsma Andrew Reiss ABSENT: Connie L. Bettinger-Hennink ALSO PRESENT: Marilyn Matthes, Library Director Roberta Reiss, Literacy Coordinator Linda Fasulo, Library Public Relations Luz Pietri, Administrative Assistant Don Beach, Member, PC Bug Group Bill Grieve, Member, PC Bug Group APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mrs, Lewis asked for comments or corrections to the minutes of October 23,2007. There being none, Mrs, Louwsma moved, seconded by Mrs, Murray and carried unanimously, that the minutes be approved as submitted. Mr. Don Beach and Mr. Bill Grieve, members of the PC Bug Computer Group were in attendance, They were here to protest the enforcement of the Library Meeting Rules as written in the Library Policies, which would allow greater access to more groups wanting to use the facilities, After some discussion, Mrs, Matthes agreed to let this group have access to the meeting room for their February and March meetings and to try to re- schedule the group's meeting in January, LITERACY PROGRAM REPORT Mrs, Reiss spoke about all the new programs coming up this season. She also stated that more tutors have been trained and have surpassed the total from last year by 20. REPORT OF OFFICERS - None COMMUNlCA nONS Mrs. Lewis wanted to commend the Friends ofthe Library on the smashing success of the recent Gala Event. Mr. Reiss stated that he had recently received a call frorn the Sheriffs Office to tell him that the Naples Regional Library appeared to be left unlocked. (His name appears first on v 161 A 15 a list of LAB members with their phone numbers which is posted by the Library's main entrance, Mrs, Matthes said the list would be removed since this information can now be found in the Library's website. UNFINISHED BUSINESS The Board reviewed the nominations submitted for selection of the Library's Employee of the Month, Mrs, Murray moved, seconded by Mrs. Louwsma and carried unanimously, to select Mona Vega, Library Assistant at the Golden Gate Branch, as EOM for November 2007. Then, Mr. Reiss moved, seconded by Mrs. Louwsma and carried unanimously, to select Michelle Ramkissoon, Library Assistant at the Naples Regional, as EOM for December 2007. In reference to the Golden Gate Library construction, Mrs. Matthes reported that the construction has been progressing at a rnuch faster pace than anticipated and that it's expected to be finished by March 2008. In reference to the South Regional Library, Mrs, Matthes stated that construction there is also progressing rapidly, NEW BUSINESS - None GENERAL CONSIDERA TrONS - None DIRECTOR'S REPORT Mrs. Matthes stated that the Immokalee CLIC Grant had been approved by the State, She also stated that the Rose Hall Construction Grant application had ranked 4th out of26 with the State, The Collection Development and the Meeting Room Policies had also been approved by the County. Lastly, Mrs, Matthes reported that a patron had complained about a picture in a story about Christmas. Mrs. Matthes handed out copies of her reply to the patron. REPORT OF THE FRIENDS - None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Library Advisory Board, Mr. Reiss moved, seconded by Mrs. Louwsma and carried unanimously, that the meeting be adjourned, Time: l0:45 a.m. APPROVED BY: C"'-'.~ \)OVJ_o \ r <~ Doris 1. Lewis v Chair, Library Advisory Board ~ \ \' ,: ialC! 'J~}~ ' A, . '. I ~ L ~!' "t" i-'la a::- ._.' ", .._._.~,_M~__ ',"Ien"'jng /f:. ___. .._.m ,"'.'.-.~.~. .oylc .m.\"~ ,;olett3 cre-'.....' -, 161 A 16 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION Municipal Services Taxing and Benefit Unit NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 6,2008 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD AT HAMMOCK OAK CENTER, 8960 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108 ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 2008 AT 1:00 P.M. 1, RollCall 2, Approval of Minutes of the January 9, 2008 Meeting 3, Audience Participation 4 Chairman's Report Vacant Position on the Board Foundation Incorporation Steering Committee Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Budget Committee Resurfacing Pathways on Myra Janco Daniels Boulevard Status, Fishing Pier, Vanderbilt Beach 5, Committee Reports Clam Bay Committee Report Educational Video Review of Clam Bay Annual Report Clam Bay Permit Extension Mangroves along the Berm Budget Committee No Report Government Relations No Report 6, Administrator's Report Pathway Capital Options Pelican Bay Services Division Office Space Lease District Offices LLC Proposal 7, Capital Projects Median Improvements - Myra Janco Daniels Boulevard Sidewalk Lighting - Myra Janco Daniels Blvd & Vanderbilt Beach Road Community Issues Sidewalk Repairs Hurricane Charley Storm Damage 8, Committee Requests 9, Audience Comments 10. Adjourn SPEAKERS FROM THE AUDIENCE WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES ADDITIONALLY, THIS NOTICE ADVISES THAT, IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED, ANY PERSON REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS AT THIS MEETING BECAUSlf.1fSlf~SABILlTY Mb OR PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT SHOULD CONTACT THE DIVISION OFFICE AT (2Mj"5~-1749 AT ' LEAST FIVE CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING, Date_l Co { It I ~ Item#: ,- C ):85 te J j';:;, '~~:_-eO""R eou"", PUB"e VE",CCE ADVISORY eOMMI~.6 I It J-? ,~~~~~ng-~'ID~ AGENDA '::o!et'Bate:~Fii6-ruiii;Y 4,2008 at 9:30 A.M. Location: Collier County Community Development Services Building, 2800 N, Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL, Conference Room # 609 / 61 0 NOTICE: PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK AT THE MEETING NEED TO COMPLETE A "REQUEST TO SPEAK" FORM. SPEAKERS MAY BE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR DISCUSSION UNLESS ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY THE COMMITTEE. ALL PARTIES PARTICIPATING IN THE PUBLIC MEETING NEED TO SPEAK ONE AT A TIME AND STATE THEIR FULL NAME AND COMPANY THEY REPRESENT, IF APPLICABLE, SO THAT THE COURT REPORTER CAN RECORD ALL STATEMENTS BEING MADE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THAT TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. PLEASE ENSURE ALL PAGERS AND CELL PHONES ARE OFF OR IN A QUIET POSITION, 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Roll Call 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3, APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 7, 2008 4, COMPLAINT REPORT -- Michaelle Crowley 5. NEW BUSINESS A. New Applications 1. Always on Time Limo, LLC - New CTO. Owner: Mario A. Gonzalez 2. Paradise Airport Rides - New CTO. Owner: Elius Merisnor 3. Express Taxi, Inc. - New CTO. Owner: Ricot Dieujuste 4. SW Cab -- New CTO. Owner: Jean B. Aristil 5. American Taxi - New CTO. Owner: Pierre Jean Louis 6. Bonita Bee Airport Express Service, LLC -- New Ownership. Owner: Scott A. Fox 7. Doris Limousine Service -- New CTO. Owner: William R. Harrop 8. MBA Airport Transportation, LLC -- New CTO. Directors: Mary E. Poelker, Judith L. Griffin, and John J. Poelker B. Change of Name 1. Carriage Limousine, LLC -- (from MM Limo, LLC). Owner: Mostafa Motamad 6. OLD BUSINESS A. What constitutes a VFH? B. Request for Legal Opinion re front plate logo on Subcontracted cars 7. SPEAKERS Mise, ComlS r L, (tl 11 8. NEXT MEETING DATE: March 3, 2008 Dete: 9. ADJOURN item#: "::-l;':!S to j COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC VEHICLE ADVISOR A:b, 'i' .. 'f"" \",,\' ,-'~'~, ) AGENDA ; (~r~ Date: February 4,2008 at 9:30 A.M, "",,,, . .",",..,0, "0 Location: Collier County Community Development Services Building, 2800 N, Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL, Conference Room # 609 / 61 0 NOTICE: PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK AT THE MEETING NEED TO COMPLETE A "REQUEST TO SPEAK" FORM. SPEAKERS MAY BE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR DISCUSSION UNLESS ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY THE COMMITTEE. ALL PARTIES PARTICIPATING IN THE PUBLIC MEETING NEED TO SPEAK ONE AT A TIME AND STATE THEIR FULL NAME AND COMPANY THEY REPRESENT, IF APPLICABLE, SO THAT THE COURT REPORTER CAN RECORD ALL STATEMENTS BEING MADE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THAT TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. PLEASE ENSURE ALL PAGERS AND CELL PHONES ARE OFF OR IN A QUIET POSITION. 1. CALL TO ORDER Fiala '~..l\,J.yry Halas ..z:-~.~-_... A. Roll Call Henning.~-,,--_.,...,..-_. Coyle _?~LL ',' 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Coletla4:-G_..,__. 3, APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 7, 2008 4. COMPLAINT REPORT -- Michaelle Crowley 5. NEW BUSINESS A. New Applications 1. Always on Time Limo, LLC - New CTO. Owner: Mario A. Gonzalez 2. Paradise Airport Rides - New CTO. Owner: Elius Merisnor 3. Express Taxi, Inc. - New CTO. Owner: Ricot Dieujuste 4. Naples Cab -- New CTO. Owner: Jean B. Aristil 5. American Taxi - New CTO. Owner: Pierre Jean Louis 6. Bonita Bee Airport Express Service, LLC -- New Ownership. Owner: Scott A. Fox 7. Doris Limousine Service -- New CTO. Owner: William R. Harrop 8. MBA Airport Transportation, LLC -- New CTO. Directors: Mary E. Poelker, Judith L. Griffin, and John J. Poelker B. Change of Name 1. Carriage Limousine, LLC -- (from MM Limo, LLC). Owner: Mostafa Motamad 6. OLD BUSINESS A. What constitutes a VFH? B. Request for Legal Opinion re front plate logo on Subcontracted cars 7. SPEAKERS 8. NEXT MEETING DATE: March 3, 2008 Mise Com!S: lle ( Pc: \ 1 9. ADJOURN Date: Item#: i :1'; tc / Fiala -- --- -. Halas _..-.-:\\~---- -- ,. Henning- ,5'_.1'-..-.---- Coyle :;:::-- Coletta- . :F1. A FE, .-----"....."", 8Me. M.s.7.1i.",e ,,;;; 16/ f) ,:"",;;;:".;:;)lle(s AdviSOry ao".".itt.. 270!) Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL :-{4104 December 6, 2007 AGENDA I. Call Meeting to Order II. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes: November 1, 2007 V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report - Caroline Soto B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard VI. Landscape Maintenance Report - CLM VII. Old Business VIII. Working Group Update's A. Utilities - Charles Arthur B. Maintenance - C. Tax Analysis - Bud Martin D. Liaison - Dick Lydon IX. New Business X. Public Comment XI. Adjournment The next meeting is scheduled for 2:00 PM, January 3, 2008 At ST. JOHNS PARISH LIFE CENTER Misc, Corres, 625111TH Ave. Naples, FL. Date: Ilem#: C>:J:~" to. 16/. , J1# , Radio Road Beautification M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee z8BS Horsesh:e Drive Sou~h. '._ ~~ \f..' Naples FL 34 4 ,lata. ,_.._..,_.."..,_..,_ . December 18, 2007 ~,::~~ingiJii~1~:~ "oyle......1tr' R_ Coletta ., 'V' . .. AGE DA I. Call Meeting to Order II. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes: November 20, 2007 V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report- Caroline Soto B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard VI. Landscape Maintenance Report A. Monthly Report- Advanced Lawn VII. Landscape Architects Report- Michael McGee A. Monthly Report B. Radio Road Project Phase I and Phase II-A ~--- ',---- VIII. Old Business A. Greenway Path Public Meeting and Plans B. Continuation of landscaping east of Santa Barbara IX. New Business X. Committee Member Comments XI. Public Comments XII. Adjournment ~~l-Bl\/FD It"':,. , ,': I ",_,; () r , :-~ i', The next meeting is scheduled for January 15, 2008 4:30 p.m. 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Mise ewes: Naples, FL 34104 Date Item#: .c IX, h" \ t,._ . -r' J 161 A18 November 20,2007 Prepared by: Danyl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Tessie Sillery, Operations Coordinator, Collier County Department of Altemative Transportation Modes Radio Road MSTU Proiect Status ( R- 21) - ACTIVE- (POC: Darryl Richard) - 9-19-07 - Dale Lewis moved to direct Staff to ensure numbers are re-stenciled on each island, Second by Betty Schedule, Motion carried unanimously 4-0, 10-16-07: Staff verified - stenciling is in the contract with Bonness Median stenciling delayed until completion of curbing project - additional 20 days was added to the schedule on curbing project, Median Numbers will be reviewed upon completion of Bonness Curbing Project. ( R - 14) - ACTIVE & ONGOING-Landscape Maintenance Contract (I'OC Darry Richard) - Contract #05-3686 Part II Radio Road MSTUlMSTD Roadway Grounds Maintenance. MSTU FUND: 158 (old 150)-l62545-634999-600811 THIS PO IS FOR MSTU FUND (150) ONLY !Notice To Proceed (P, 0, #4500048335) MSTD FUND: 112-163652-634999-620141 THIS PO IS FOR MSTD FUND ONLY Contract Expiration Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 Notice To Proceed (P, O. #4500048336) 7-28-05: Original NTP for Contract issued (1 year initial contract; 3 renewal periods of 1 year) 2-20-07: Confirmation of repair oflrrigation Mainline on Devonshire Fund 158 (MSTU) 10-12-07: New Fiscal Year 07/08 - NTP given with PO, 10-16-07: Committee motioned for Advance must attend meetings, 11-20-07: Contract Section: Contractor's Attendance states: CONTRACTOR'S MEETING ATTENDANCE "During the Contract Period, the Contract Manager or an Advisory Committee if applicable, may have questions concerning maintenance issues. The Contractor shall be required to attend monthly meetings and other special meetings that the Contract Manager should require, There shall be no additional charge for attendance to these meetings, If the Contractor fails to attend the monthly meetings without an excused absence an amount equal to two (2) hours of the supervision labor rate as listed on the Bid Page shall be deducted from the monthly billing of the Contractor against the Contract total." 11-20-07: Advanced Lawn has confirmed attendance at monthly meetings as per staff request, (R - 13) - ACTIVE & ONGOING (Pac: Tessie Sillery) - Annual Services Contract: McGee & Associates 9-19-06: Radio Road MSTU Committee Approved proposal from McGee in the amount of: $11,445,00 for annual consulting services. 11-3-06: NTP was given to McGee & Associates with a Project Completion Date - September 30, 2007. 9-30-07: PO Rolled into FY07-08, 10-19-07: Committee Approved Annual Contract with McGee $ $11,950,00 11-7-07: County staff requested McGee to revise proposal. 11-20-07: Work Order bas been submitted for staff review, Approval of Work Order and PO issue pending, (R - 12B) &(R-16) (Combined Bidding) - ACTlVE- LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION PROJECT (PaC Danyl Richard) - Radio Road MSTU: (Phase One & Phase II-A) Landscape & Irrigation - Add Corporate (CO Pending) 1 16/ A18 PROJECT SCHEDULE: Radio Road MSTU: (Phase One & Phase II-A) Landscape & Irrigation FYI: PHASE Start. End Date PROJECT SCHEDULE: PHASE 10ooio Submittal 21 DAY BIDDING BID DUE BCC APPR NTP Material Purchase 90 DAY (Material Purchase & Irrigation install) CONST-COMPLETE NTP CONST 90 DAY CONST CONST -COMPLETE Start - End Date 9/21/2007 10/5/2007-11/612007 11/6/2007 \2/\ 1/2007 1116/2008 1/16/08-4/14/08 4/14/2008 4/15/2008 4/\5/08-7/\5/08 7/15/2008 (Irrigation, and Plantings) - Work Order for Design to be initiated in FY-06 (October 1,2005); Construction Cost: $810,000,00 ; Design Cost: $64,300,00 McGee & Associates 4-10-07: Re-use availability is questionable at this time, Roger Dick reports it may be wise to wait until re- use line is run up to Radio Road as part of current Santa Barbara Project, 4-13-07: Discussion with Roger Dick and Pam Lulich indicate that Re-U se department supplements Re- Use with Well water during 3 months of the year (typically April, May, and June), Thus water staining may occur during these 3 months of the year to existing curbing and/or other structures over-sprayed with irrigation water. 4-17-07: McGee recommends mixing tanks for project. Committee votes to add mixing tanks to project. 5-23-07: McGee recommends not adding Corporate Section to project at this time as it is not entirely curbed with Type F Curbing, 7-19-07: Overall Committee consensus - not to include Corporate Section into Phase I - Landscape and Irrigation, 7-23-07: 90% plans - still pending - no plans 8-22-07 90% plans - still pending - no plans 9-12-07 : 100% plans received for bidding - pending Purchasing 11-07-07: Bid 08-5004 -received on 11-6-07 - Hannula low bidder - Bid tabs are pending, 11-20-07: Bid Tabulation received from Purchasing Dept. Hannula is low bid for both base bid ($363,957,06) and alternates ($100,477.56) (R- 12A) - COMPUTE- (pac Darryl Richard) - Radio Road MSTU: Phase One - Curbing (Devonshire to Broadview Dr) (Curbing, Irrigation, and Plantings) - Work Order for Design to be initiated in FY-06 (October 1,2005); Construction Cost: $810,000,00; Design Cost: $64,300,00 McGee & Associates PROJECT SCHEDULE: 2 16/ A' .";!",, ''FYi /'-1.1" , "" Radio Road MSTU: Phase One - Curbing (Devonshire to Broadview Dr) PHASE 8mrt-EndDaw DESIGN 9/11/06-1/29/07 14 DAY Quotes from Annual Contract 5/11/2007-5/25/2007 BID DUE 5/25/2007 BCC APPR 6/26/2007 NTP CaNST 7/17/2007 90 DAY CONST 10/15/2007 CONST-COMPLETE 10/15/2007 12-15-05-McGee sent notice to go 'on hold' for Project. 3-06-06 - McGee to revise scope of project as per Don Scott, 3-20-06 - McGee sent 'Go Ahead' on Work Order, 4-4-06-McGee submits request to modify work order in amount of$6,696,OO (submit for Committee Approval) 5-1-06; Radio Road Curbing Plan 30% Submittal Review is pending, May 2, 2006 meeting to address Access Management issues. 5-15-06; Access mgmt. Meeting on 5-3-06 ; as per Diane Flagg project will be phased into Phases I and Phase 11, Dale Bathon confirming with funding from transportation and Don Scott confirming with Transportation Administration, 5-30-06; Project is to include 3 phases, mcgee & assoc, to provide scope for phase I. - Pending Phase 1- From (Devonshire - West to western most boundry of Berkshire Lakes Subdivision) Phase II - From ( Western most boundary of Bershire to Livingston) Phase III- From (Livingston to Airport) 6-12-06: McGee & Associates preparing proposal for phase I, and waiting on final billing on old work order. 6-27-06: Need McGee proposal for phase I. 7-12-06: Need McGee proposal for phase I. 8-4-06: MSTU approved McGee Proposal for Phase I 8-22-06: Work Order for McGee Phase I is in process of SAP upload, PO number is pending, NTP is anticipated by August 24, 2006, 8-25-06: Diane Flagg request verification that the Total Amount spent will not exceed the original Work Order Amount of $64,300,00 (versus new proposal for: $17,330,00) 9-11-06: McGee & Associates sends correspondence in response to Staff request for confmnation of anticipated cost for consulting for Phase I, II, and 1II combined, Copy provided for September 19, 2006 Radio Road MSTU regular meeting, 9-11-06: Notice to Proceed issued to McGee & Associates for Phase One Project; TLO-MA-36 14-06-16; p, 0, #4500066290; Total net project is $17,330,02; Work Order time-line of 140 days with Project Start Date is September 11,2006 and Project End Date is January 29, 2007, 9-19-06: TECM Engineer Dale Bathon submits proposal for advancement of a portion of Phase II Project into the Phase I project scope from Livingston Rd, to Kings Way, The Radio Road MSTU Committee votes to not include this section in Phase I Project. Phase One project schedule: Design Complete January 29, 2007; Bidding Phase February 2007; BCC Approval of Award March 13,2007; NTP April 30, 2007; Construction 120 time-line with Completion by August 30, 2007 11-21-06: McGee 100% submittal for Curbing Phase I has been rejected by TECM Engineers - TECM recommends Sub-Consultant Engineer for Curbing Plans, TECM requires Signed & Sealed Plans by State Licensed Engineer prior to approval. 1-16-07 Proposal from McGee for Sub Consultant - to be reviewed by Committee 1-17-07 Committee approved McGee for Sub Consultant - $ 2,510,00 1-29-07: Called and left message for Consultant to revise spreadsheet on costs, 2-13-07: McGee revised spreadsheet included in proposed Change Order #1. 2-20-07: Change Order #1 is being reviewed by Staff for approval. Inclusion of Engineer Sub-consultant is only item in Change Order. 3-8-07: NTP for Change Order # I. 3 161 A18 3-20-07: Formal Request sent to McGee for confmnation of delivery of 100% Drawings prior to 3-30-07 4-16-07: Coordination meeting for Public Meeting to be held May I" from 5 to 7 PM. 100% plans (revised) pending from McGee, 5-2-07: TECM revisions as per PIM Meeting forwarded to McGee, Revision due by 5110107, 6-19-07: Novus item - 16B - BCC meeting of 6-26-07 - Bonness, Inc, $ 433,885.43 7-10-07: Bcc approved, - PO request submitted on - 6-27-07 with Signed Work Order, 7-10-07: Pending release from purchasing for PO, 7-17-07: NTP given to Bonness 7-18-07: Discussed overall project with Bonnes & set up weekly meetings - begiruting August 3,d 8-22-07: Root pruning to magnolia trees - ETI - trees to be moved upon receipt of PO - pending BA, 9-10-07: Budget Amendment processed by Gloria and we received PO for ETI on 9-4-07. 9-18-07: Change Order # 1 pending 10-22-07: Change Order Processed and notification went out to McGee & Assoc. 11-07 -07: Change Order # 1 pending. (R-20) -COMPLETE - (p.Oe. Darryl) - Root Pruning & Removal and relocation of Trees on Radio Road 8-22-07: Notice to Proceed - ETI- $1,750 for root pruning and within 3 weeks (after BA) is approved the PO will be increased with the difference. ($8,530.00 is the total amount of estimate) 9-10-07: Week of 9-24"' to 28"' - anticipation of moving trees, - pending locates 9-24-07: Darryl met in field with En and to be completed by 9-26-07, 9-26-07: Project Completed (R-20) -COMPLETE - (poe Darryl) - Root Pruning & Removal and relocation of Trees on Radio Road 8-22-07: Notice to Proceed - ETI - $1,750 for root prunmg and within 3 weeks (after BA) is approved the PO will be increased with the difference, ($8,530,00 is the total amount of estimate) 9-10-07: Week of 9_24"' to 28"' - anticipation of moving trees, - pending locates 9-24-07: Darryl met in field with En and to be completed by 9-26-07, 9-26-07: Project Completed (R - 17) - COMPLETE - TECM-Radio Road - (Phase II-A) Curbing - Brairwood to Commercial & Corporate (IN FORMA nON ONLY) R-19) - COMPLETE (P,(),C. Darryl) Corporate Square Pavers (P. O. #4500082550: dated 816(2007); Work Order: BC-FT -3773-0710- (60 day Work Order) completion date October 6, 2007 7-23-07- Requested for Quote from Bonness for project 8-7-07: Notice to Proceed 9-10-07: To be completed by 9-11-07 9-11-07 : Project Complete (R - 15) - COMPLETE, RE-USE WATER PROJECT PERMI f'TING PHASE (POC: Darryl Richard) 3-08-07: Updated application for Re-Use Gallons per minute and approval pending 4-10-07: Re-use availability is questionable at this time, Roger Dick reports it may be wise to wait until re- use line is run up to Radio Road as part of current Santa Barbara Project. 4-13-07: Discussion with Roger Dick and Pam Lulich indicate that Re-Use department supplements Re- Use with Well water during 3 months of the year (typically April, May, and June), Thus water staining may occur during Ihese 3 months of the year to existing curbing and/or other structures over-sprayed with irrigation water. 4-17-07: McGee recommends mixing tanks for project, Committee votes to add mixing tanks to project, 4 16/ A18 4-27-07: Utilities confirms that RE-USE Application has been approved and will forward hardcopy, 5-7-07: Re-Use Application is approved. Hardcopy scanned and forwarded to Mike McGee, ( R - 19) - COMPLETE- Painting of Radio Road Median Tips with Numbers - The median tips (bull- nose) are to be painted yellow in accordance with FDOT standards with median numbers, 10-17-06: Committee approves not to exceed $2,500,00 for project. Directs staff to utilize annual contractor. Trutwin annual is active for painting within ROW, 10-23-06: Direction to utilize 'in house' Road & Bridge Department funds and resources for project, Given that the medians are 'County Property', 11-20-06: John Vliet, Road & Bridge rejected plans to paint curb #'s on Radio Road, 11-20-06: Staff requested quote for Trutwin to paint curb #'s on Devonshire, 1-3-07: PO & NTP to Trutwin 1-29-07: Project Complete (R-Il) COMPLETE - SDP PLAN REQUEST; SOP 3425 Radio Road - Plan review by Committee for Landscape Plans submitted for development, 11-21-06: This SDP Plan does not affect MSTU/MSTD plantings or irrigations, ( R - 15) - COMPLETE - Pavers for FoxfIre Medians 9-19-06: Radio Road MSTU votes to install pavers at the median tips (bull-nose) for the West Median and East Median at FoxfIre, 9-19-06: Staff request Quote from Bonness for the paver installation, 10-10-06: Staff receives quote from Bonness in the amount of$9,257,70, Request to Purchase submitted. 11-6-06: Begin Construction of project by Bonness, Inc, pavers to match existing specification, 11-10-06: Project Completed ( R - 18) - COMPLETE - Radio Road Median Irrigation Conversion - Allamanda and Plumago Planting Beds to be converted from drip line system to irrigation spray heads on risers, 10-17-06: Committee approves of conversion based on 112 funding no motion necessary, Mike McGee advises Committee and Staff that conversion is necessary to ensure plant health, 10-30-06: Median irrigation conversion is progressing, irrigation mainline break is repaired during project. 11-6-06: Project Complete; Inspection for Punch-List to follow Nov, 6 to 9 for proper operation, (R-IO) COMPLETE - SDP 7405 Devonshire Blvd-- Plan review by Committee for Landscape Plans submitted for development. 9-25-06: Plans reviewed with ROW, Contractor has removed shrubs on County ROWand will be required to replace shrubs and damaged irrigation system, 10-17-06: Copy of Plans provided for Committee review, Landscaping found to be satisfactory, ( R - 17) - COMPLETE - Committee Chairman request for information regarding 'loan' to MSTU 9-19-06: Radio Road MSTU Committee Chairman request staff provide a report on options available to the MSTU in so far as a 'loan' or advancement of funds, (1) What is the maximum amount? (2) Is there any interest? (3) What is the amount of time allowed for repayment? 10-17-06: Staff provides answer as per discussion with Budget: (I) Maximum amount is determined by 'Project Need' which would be after all cost considerations are identified. Review and approval by County Manager's OffIce/ County Attorney's Office Required; (2) Interest on loan would be negotiated through County Manager's Office and County Attorney; (3) Amount of time for repayment would be negotiated through County Manager's Office and County Attorney; Note: The advancement of funds requires Board of County Commissioner's approval. (R - 14)- COMPLETE -Request from TECM Engineer Dale Bathon - Phase 11 Project item 9-19-06: Dale Bathon submits plans for a section of Phase 11 project (Livingston Rd, to Kings Way) for inclusion into Phase I project. 9-19-06: Radio Road MSTU Committee votes not to include Phase 11 item into Phase 1 project. (R-9) CANCEI.LED -Well Water Mitigation (Chemical Treatment of Well Water)- Cancelled- 5 ..".._,~,..~ 161 A 18 -,v.lll!' September 12,2005: 8/l6/05 committee cancelled project. Cost was determined to be excessive for annual maintenance of filtration system, (R - 8) - COMPLETE -Milage Rate ( ,25 vs .50) - Dale Lewis requested for the history at the Budget (Carry Forward vs Audit - follow up meeting) with all the MSTU Chairman - 7-17-06 8-22-06: Sharon Newman's report is pending, 8-25-06: Norman Feder, Transportation Administrator accepts responsibility for the adjustment of the Millage Rate from ,50 to ,25 (during FY-04 to FY-05), The Radio Road MSTU Committee may vote to increase Millage back to ,50 for the FY-08 Budget Request, Currently the Radio Road Project Funds are sufficient for current project demands, (R -7) - COMPLETE - Devonshire Maintenance (Fund 150)-Advanced Lawn Estimate 06-191; On August 4, 2006, By Committee Action, Committee approved $17,290,00 for items included in Advanced Lawn estimate for Devonshire Maintenance (Fund 150), Scope of project is stump grinding, Viburnum replacement and incidental irrigation repairs (included in quote, as per Frank Kip, owner) 8-24-06; Advanced Lawn Crews begin stump Grinding 8-25-06; Mike Luneke, Advanced Lawn confIrms that stump grinding is at 100% completion, Staff to inspect. Advanced Lawn will fInish planting of Viburnum by 8-26-06, 8-31-06: Project is complete (R - 6) - COMPLETE - Radio Road Maintenance (Fund 112) -Advanced Lawn Estimate 06-184, 06-185, and 06-186; On August 4, 2006, Committee reviewed items included in Advanced Lawn estimate for Radio Road Maintenance (Fund 112), Scope of project is replacement of Juniper Plants, installation of mulch material, and installation of irrigation components, 8-25-06; Mike Luneke, Advanced Lawn confIrms that project is at 100% completion, Staff to inspect, (R-5) COMPLETE - PROJECT TRANSFERRED TO CAT FUNDING-CAT Bus Shelter (R-4) -COMPLETE- Sod Refurbishment at median I Radio Road at Santa Barbara -COMPLETE - Advanced Lawn, (R-3) -COMPLETE-Pump Repair -Radio Road- COMPLETE; Repair By County (R-2) -COMPLETE-Annual Maintenance Contract Bidding- July 28, 2005: NTP Contract 05-3686 Part ll, issued to Advanced Lawn Maintenance - Completed (R-l) COMPLETE -ARBORIST SERVICES CONTRACT; Committee requested McGee to provide quote for arborist services, McGee Scope for Arborist Services cannot be approved as per LA 04-3614, Landscape Architectural Services Fixed, Terms and Conditions, Additional Quotes requested as per Committee Direction. 4-17-06; Davey Tree Company is low quote at $15,350,00 for both consultation and maintenance,(submit for Committee Action) 5-1-06; Documentation for Request to Purchase submitted, PO is pending, 5-15-06: Project complete with Field Inspection pending 5-30-06 Inspection complete - contractor to perform additional final pruning late fall. 6-27-06: Final pruning in fall to be done 6 o~fi::il~~ -4UJUJ)ooo )ommzQQ ....;:o;oUJmm m<<"-4-4 )(mmm-4-i ~UJo~~~ Z ;oOzz UJ nZOOOO III OUJ-i)> z-4n" -4 n" Z 0;0 Q .- m 161-' -. .... \I ;;:: V V .. V' u ~ ~ ~ w Z ... v ~ Z ... 0 - ."" , ~1 B ~~~";o~1~1m)>~zo~~~~~1z0Q~~m~~~~~~~;o ZZ~ ;om-.m -4 n-4Z;o"m ;o",~z;o;ozzmoo)> C/)oo)oO)o;o~;o'--OO~m^)>~;O~~m""*~~~~~Z-40 ~-4""~~om;;::~~~ Z'-~Q8~-im~m~oo~~ffi~~ ~~g~~~~~~)>~ ~~m~~m80~-4C/)~~""~~5 ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~)>)>~~~z;o ~~OO~~~>ooO-i >~Zm g-o;o;om<o;oo;oo;;::;;::g-im~ Q~Z zz;Om zm -. m Z -i)>-' ~ Z mC/)Q mQ~~ o;;::~ cm- -iOQ)>"C;o-i n ZmOO 0 z)> 00;;::.- )>~~ ~."m)(,,~rn~ o C C 0'- n)> .-)>c mmZn;o-i ;0 "00 (0)>- 00.- 2 0 "'U "'0 m ()r- -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*~~~~~~~~~ - ~ - - ~ m~ t N N - ... ~ N 0; (;) (;) ~ N N a> 'J. a> ~ ~ ~ a> .... '" ~ ~ a> <Xl '" ~N C CD CD !D .CD .a !>> N N N ~ ~ ~ 1" <0 ~o _0 ~ .a ~ '" ..... CD a> N ~ a> .!'J.9!'J 0.= Go ~ ~ ..... ~ m ~ '" ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ '0 00 0 .... 0 '0 m '" mOl CnID :.., <Xl 0 <Xl CD 0. UI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <0 <0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UI 0 CD <0 0 000 _CD CD 0 0 !=' 0 0 !=' 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 !=' 0 !=' !=' 0 0 0 0 !=' ~ CD 0 ~ ~ !=' 000 0. :... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~a ~ ~ 0 000 ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a> a> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1>0 .9 a> .9 90.8 ... ... ... ... ...... ... ... ... iflt.9t.9t.9t.9i:Ai>9-MtR-EflfIJ.UJifl.UJtIt ... ... ~ tR t.9 t.9.UJ ......... W N - a> N ~ '" '" ~ N !>> .... N '" ~ :.., ... 0,0 .... ~ ..... m :'::'0 ..... - CD o ~ ~ 0 <Xl CD "'<0 CD <I> '" 9~ 0 !=' ~ !=' <ON '" r ~ 00 m 0 :,.. CD 0:"" '" a> 0'" '" 0 0 ..... o ~ 0 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... t.9t.9-(flt.9tfliflt.9f1J-fh-tfltflifltfltfl-(fl ...... tR -ffl tfl i:A iR ......... o o 3 3 ;:;: 3 CD = It - ~ (;) ~ .... w '" .N .a> .... b a> a> W N '" '" '" CD '" ..... '" '" ..... -:::; .... '" N '" CD <Xl <Xl ~ 0 a> 0 - '" '" <Xl ..... ..... 0 a> N '" .... !=' ~ <Xl ~ ..... ~ ..... ..., CD N a> '" '" g, N :,.. ..... N <0 '" a> 0 :,.. 0 <Xl Co N <0 ..... ..... (II ..... <0 <Xl <Xl '" ~ 0 '" a> 0 <0 UI ~ ~~ .9 .9 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ifltfltfl-6't-tRifltfl-ffltfl-tfltRiflifliflt.9 ... ... -Efl tfl tfl -{I} {R ......... m .. CD )0 an _. c -.. c- iil OJ - ~ ~ :.. 0 '0 w ~ N N 0 0 <0 CD <0 CD 0 <Xl ~ .N 1" ~ ~ .... :.. '" '" ~ '0 <0 '" '" ~ ~ -<0 '" N (j; W 0 0 ..... a> 0 0 0 0 <0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 ~ :--' a> 00 0 0 '" 0 !=' 0 :.." 0 0 ..... ~ N 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... 0 0 '" ~ N 0 0 0 0 .... 0 0 .9 "2 s: " a III III " ","2. = .- a '" ,. &l c '" 0 => 0 '" !,!, -< 2 ~ '" - ~ )> ... N 0; (;) (;) -i< ~ ~~ "'- '" '" ~ .... a> <Xl '" ~N o !!. _<0 0 .... 9' ~ '" 9' ....a> J>> ~(J"I a> '" _N ~o_'" - - '0 '0 '0 m wm :.., w .. .. 0 .... 0 ..... CD <0 '" 000 -IT 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 ~ CIlO '" <0 0 ~ <Xl NON CD !=' !=' !=' 0 N 0 !=' !=' N "'0 ~~ !=' N a> a>oa> 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 '" NO <0 ~ 0 N <0 wow 0 0 .9 0 0 .9 0 0 .....0 -:::! a> .9 '" a> 809 " ." n III ~ a 0' '" a iil ~ ~ => < < '" a: => III CD - III ",- '" => = -< =;- n '" 0 '" '" 0. ::::0 :::t 0 0. CD ... "'CO '0 '-z ",Ill'< o!:!:m III .. C a .. ~ 3 n::J"C CD '" iil C/J Y.! .".- ~Jg ==1>> N :; !!i 0. oom c l'l iD !!~ OJ fi: -- ;::]..:< !!. ~~4' o~ a :T ... 5' o'rc => o .., CD if::J 3 :u o ill ;0'- a III III => 0.0. :e ~ III III '<1jl ... ... a> .... ~m <Xl <0 ~ 0 ~(o 0..... <Mifl-tRt.9iflifltfl-fflt.9-tfltflifl> n - c !!. ~ .. a: - w '" CD W N '" '" ... ~ <Xl <Xl ~ ~ 0 a> <0 !=' ..... <Xl <0 <Xl N W CD :,.. m 0 Co CD ~ '" a> 0 '" CD ~ S < t CD "TI C rrC:~ CD z C .. c) .., ... t 001 ~ CD i o (j o - ...... C , .,~ J,... cc. 'L h luua Radio Road Beautification M.S.T.U. 16/ '''d' , c), A'ini'101ig",oners November 20, 2007 Advisory Committee 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples FL 34104 Fiala ..__....__...,.. Halas... ...._..._ Henning...._ .__..._... _, , Coyle Cnletta .~ Minutes ../ I. The meeting was called to order by Dale Lewis at 4:25 PM. II. ATTENDANCE Members: Dale Lewis, Betty Schudel, Bill Jaeger, Helen Carella (Excused) County: Darryl Richard - Project Manager, Tessie Sillery - Operations Coordinator, Caroline Soto - Budget Analyst Others: Mike McGee - McGee & Assoc., Dan Mote - Advanced Lawn, Darlene Lafferty- Mancan III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Betty Schudel moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Dale Lewis. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 16,2007 Betty Schudel moved to approve the October 16, 2007 Minutes as submitted. Second by Bill Jaeger. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. V. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: A. Budget Report - Caroline Soto distributed and reviewed (See attached) · Operating Expense $161605.00 · Improvernents General Available $1,001,100,00 B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard distributed and reviewed (See attached). · (R-21) Median numbers were re-painted · Contractor Meeting Attendance - It was stated Attendance was a Contractual requirement. Noted Advanced Lawn was in attendance today & would continue to do so for all future rneetings · McGee & Associates FY08 proposal in the amount of$II,950.00 is in the approval process · (R-2B & (R-16) Landscape & Irrigation Project reviewed l}i.~ 0~-5004 (See attached) recommended awarding Base Bid $363,957.1Jl!i'& orres Alternate Bid $100,477.56 to Hannula Landscaping. Dale: Item#: :'.~J,?<; to' 161 A 18 Dale Lewis questioned Phase I - page 3 MSTU/CoIlier County section that did not include pricing. Noted if the Bid was approved today the "By County" cost was not included in the $363,957.06 Base Bid. Darryl Richard responded that additional "By County" cost information was needed. Discussions ensued & it was recommended to approve expenditures that were listed. Dale Lewis moved to accept $464,434.62 Bid 08-5004 from Hannula Landscaping. Second by Bill Jaeger. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. Darryl Richard stated he would coordinate with McGee & Associates to address the "By County" items. Additional contractor quotes would be required Dale Lewis requested the "By County" Bids for the December IS, 2007. VI. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT: Monthly Report - Advanced Lawn Dan Mote reported: . Devonshire Insecticide treatment 11-13-07 . Radio Road Insecticide treatment 11-14-07 . Devonshire has been mulched . Wilting beds on Devonshire - will conduct 10 minute checks & manually water the beds until the problem is resolved Mike McGee stated the problem was an inadequate water supply. Roger Dick was checking 2 zones to obtain an accurate count on gallonage. A schedule would then be re-created based on the number of valves that were required & determine the number of valves that were disconnected during Phase I. VII. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECH REPORT: Mike McGee A. Monthly Report - reported an accident in the middle of a Plumbago bed that damaged 2 Buttonwoods. It was recommended to remove the existing Plumbago and not replant. The following 2 options were recommended: 1. Remove existing damaged plants and apply mulch 2. Plant Crown of Thoms a very draught tolerant plant Dale Lewis requested an estimate to plant Crown of Thoms be submitted at the December IS, 2007. Darryl Richard announced the possibility of an increase in watering restrictions to I day per week. Mike McGee recommended the removal of 3 old Hibiscus trees at rnedian #3 on Devonshire & replace with mulch. 2 161 AIR Darryl Richard recommended revisiting at a later date to determine type of replacement plant once the watering restriction is finalized and the Project is completed & reuse is connected. Dale Lewis moved to remove (3 Hibiscus trees) & wait until the project is completed in regards to the water application& revisit the project after that Second by Bill Jaeger. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. B. Radio Road Curbing - None VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. Greenway Path Public Meeting and Plans - Darryl Richard stated the report will be available at the December 18, 2007 meeting. IX. NEW BUSINESS A. Continuation of landscaping east of Santa Barbara - Darryl Richard - None Mike McGee reported for Phase I received a Contractor quote for Hydro seed in the amount of$5000 for median interior along Devonshire to Blue Sky. Dale Lewis requested delaying the application of the Hydro seed due to ongoing projects. Darryl Richard stated he would contact Road & Bridge for approval to install a strip of sod along the curbing & fill the interior with dirt temporarily. X. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS - None XI. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 5:30 PM. 3 Radio Road Beauti!~o! MSTU A 18 Advisory Committee /;)&t ~~~ Dale Lewis, Chairman These minutes approved by the Committee on as presented or amended The next meeting will be held at 4:30 PM, January 15, 2008 Collier County Transportation BuildinglEast Conference Room 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 4 161 A 18 " " ", Radio Road Beautification M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Naples FL 34104 SUMMARY OF MINUTES & MOTIONS November 20 2007 III. & IV. Agenda & Minutes of October 16,2007 were approved unanimously. V. Transportation Services Report B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard . Landscape & Irrigation Project reviewed Bid 08-5004 (See attached) recommended awarding Base Bid $363,957.06 & Alternate Bid $100,477.56 to Hannula Landscaping. Dale Lewis questioned Phase I - page 3 MSTU/Collier County section that did not include pricing. Noted if the Bid was approved today the "By County" cost was not included in the $363,957.06 Base Bid. Dale Lewis moved to accept $464,434.62 Bid 08-5004 from Hannula Landscaping. Second by Bill Jaeger. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. VII. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECH REPORT: Mike McGee A. Monthly Report -recomrnended the removal of 3 old Hibiscus trees at median #3 on Devonshire & replace with mulch. Dale Lewis moved to remove (3 Hibiscus trees) & wait until the project is completed in regards to the water application& revisit the project after that Second by Bill Jaeger. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. 161 ,; Radio Road Beautification M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee z885 Horseshoe Drive South . ~ ~! \f' Naples FL J4l04 Fiata, C_~.,' - ~,'_,-j,., eo~~~nq:~~,' "'~.'.vA ',' January 15, 2008 '~ ' y,eJtbp"'" ,_,olett? G!../ AGENDA I. Call Meeting to Order II. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes: December 18,2007 V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report- Caroline Soto B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard VI. Landscape Maintenance Report A. Monthly Report- Advanced Lawn VII. Landscape Architects Report- Michael McGee A. Monthly Report B, Radio Road Project Phase I and Phase II-A VIII. Old Business A. Greenway Path Public Meeting and Plans B, Continuation of landscaping east of Santa Barbara IX, New Business X. Committee Member Comments XI. Public Comments XII. Adjournment A 18 " ~ ,,~..,,:,,~ lit 12 The next meeting Is scheduled for February 19, 200~if?3tPj9:m.l (; 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 Date: Item #:__-- 16/ A18 .....:.i ,~ , , " , Radio Road Beautification M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee . 2885 Horseshoe Drive SouthFlala -----.-.--- Naples FL 34104 Hala~ --:?"i'\r----'--- Henl1lng.:l..D----..-- ., December 18, 2007 g~f~~4=::& ... o Minutes I. The meeting was called to order by Dale Lewis at 4:32 PM. II. ATTENDANCE Members: Dale Lewis, Betty Schudel, Bill Jaeger, Helen Carella County: Darryl Richard - Project Manager, Tessie SilIery - Operations Coordinator, Caroline Soto - Budget Analyst, Roger Dick -- Irrigation Project Manager, Pam Lulich - Landscape Operations Manger Others: Mike McGee - McGee & Assoc., Dan Mote -- Advanced Lawn, Darlene Lafferty- Mancan III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Add: V. B. 1. Roger Dick 2, Pam Lulich Betty Schudel moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Second by Dale Lewis. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 20, 2007 Change: V. A, to read Operating Expense "$161,605.00 " Betty Schudel moved to approve the November 20, 2007 Minutes as amended. Second by Dale Lewis. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. V. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: A. Budget Report - Caroline Soto distributed and reviewed (See attached) . Irnprovements General Budget $1,264,593.16 . Remaining P.O. Balance $37,191.11 for Bonness B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard distributed and reviewed (See attached). . (R-15) Quote for "By County" Items Bid 08-5004 - The Board of County Commissioners approved the Bid A ward to Hannula in the amoWlt of $464,434.62 on December 11,2007. The Contract is currently Wlder review. The question was raised if the Project would be restricted due to Misas6m'es Date 1 l~em #:______ - ~'J(.:.1 tc 161 A18 ~ Darryl Ricbard stated the Project would not be delayed based on the following timeline: I. The 1 st Notice to Proceed would be issued after receiving approval from Purchasing, Risk Management, & the County Attorneys a. Irrigation installation & material purchasing would occur within the first 90 days b. Lane closures would not be required during the 90 day period 2. "On or About" April 15, 2008 a Notice to Proceed will be issued for Landscaping installation to occur within a 90 day period . (R-12B) & (R-16) (Combined Bidding) Radio Road MSTU (Phase I & Phase II-A) Landscape & Irrigation Darryl Ricbard foresees the issuance of the Notice to Proceed by January 16, 2008. He will monitor closely to remain on schedule. The Quote for "By County" Items Bid was distributed. (See Attached) Pam Lulicb announced US41 N was recently landscaped. A ROW Permit application for US41 N (Phase 5) Two Lakes Development has been subrnitted. She has requested Mike McGee review the MSTU Radio Rd Project to integrate the Landscaping materials that will be relocated. She stated the relocation of materials would be at developer cost noting Radio Rd. is maintained under the 112 Fund & would reduce MSTU Contract Cost significantly. Mike McGee reviewed the "By County" Phase I & Phase IIA MSTU item cost for the Reuse Conversion totaling $88,600. Darryl Ricbard distributed AG-TRONIX quote #832 & #833 in the amount of $22,600. (See Attached) Mike McGee noted the quotes would upgrade the system to County Standards for the Reuse Systern. Discussions ensued & was agreed to wait for cost quotes from Annual Electrical Contractors. Dale Lewis moved to accept $22,600 "Not to Exceed" for components from A G- TRONIX. Second by Betty SchudeL Motion carried unanimously 4-0. VI. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT: A. Montbly Report - Advanced Lawn Dan Mote reported: . Cleared Palmetto's on Radio Rd. & Devonshire . Replaced damaged Silver Button Wood Trees & Plumbago from an accident (across from Taylor Rental) with Crown of Thorn Dale Lewis inquired about the accident report. Tessie Sillery responded none received to date . Rernoved 3 Hibiscus Trees on Devonshire median 2 161 -~ . December 5, 2007 Treated Plumbago. Will continue treatments A 1 8 "" Bi-weekly . Problem areas of Alarnanda were lacking irrigation. Advanced Lawn will heavily water to revive Darryl Richard reported a notification from Code Enforcement on a hedge (behind Publix) affecting visibility. Stated the ROW Handbook requires a height of30 inches. Noted Advanced Lawn would trirn to the required height. A Stump in Devonshire median was reported. Discussions ensued concerning the renumbering of the medians. It was stated $1,200 was previously paid for median numbering. Noting TECM installed turn lanes & destroyed the numbering. Discussions continued & it was determined the numbering process was not complete. An assessment was needed to determine the number of medians that required renumbering. After the evaluation TECM would be contacted for reimbursement. Dale Lewis moved to know by next meeting a quote on MSTU, TECM & County (MSTD) cost (for the numbering of the medians). Second by Helen Carella. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. A large hole in a Palm base located in the median on Devonshire was reported. VII. LANDSCAPE ARCBITECH REPORT: Mike McGee A. Monthly Report - Identified the following problem areas: :>> Median #9 recommended adding Crown of Thorns :>> Median #12 Juniper on the median East end is sparse. Will fill in the tip with Crown of Thorn :>> Median # 17 Dry Alarnanda will be replaced if it does not rebound. Plumbago also trending downward. :>> Median # 19 Section of Plumbago will require a 50% trade out Discussions ensued & plant replacernent cost was questioned Dan Mote estimated 90 replacement plants would be required. Dale Lewis moved to authorize Mike McGee & Advance Lawn to fIX these areas (Median) not to exceed $3,000. Second by Bill Jaeger. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. B. Radio Road Project Phase I and Phase II - Previously discussed V.B. VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. Greenway Path Public Meeting and Plans - No funding Available frorn TECM. B. Continuation of landscaping east of Santa Barbara - Per Pam Lulich no information available at this time 3 16/ IX. NEW BUSINESS - None X. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS - None XI. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 5:30 PM. Radio Road Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee ~~/~ Dale Lewis, Chairman These minutes "roved by the Committee on as presented I or amended . 1- IS -O~ The next meeting will be held at 4:30 PM, February 19, 2008 Collier County Transportation Building/East Conference Room 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 4 A IP ~ 261 AIQ Radio Road Beautification M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Naples FL 34104 SUMMARY OF MINUTES & MOTIONS December 18 2007 I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Add: VB. 1. Roger Dick 2, Pam Lulich Betty Schudel moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Second by Dale Lewis. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. 11. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 20, 2007 Change: V A. to read Operating Expense "$161, 605,00" Betty Schudel moved to approve the November 20, 2007 Minutes as amended. Second by Dale Lewis. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. 111. & IV. Agenda & Minutes of November 20, 2007 were approved unanimously. V. Transportation Services Report B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard Darryl Richard distributed AG- TRONIX quote #832 & #833 in the amount of $22,600. (See Attached) Dale Lewis moved to accept $22,600 "Not to Exceed" for components from A G _ TRONIX Second by Betty Schudel. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. It was stated $1,200 was previously paid for median numbering. Noting TECM installed turn lanes & destroyed the numbering. An assessment was needed to determine the number of medians that required renumbering. After the evaluation TECM would be contacted for reimbursement. Dale Lewis moved to know by next meeting a quote on MSTU, TECM & County (MSTD) cost (for the numbering of the medians). Second by Helen Carella. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. 16/ AlP Mike McGee reported on Median Landscaping problem areas. Dan Mote estimated 90 replacement plants would be required. Dale Lewis moved to authorize Mike McGee & Advance Lawn to fIX these areas (Median) not to exceed $3,000. Second by Bill Jaeger. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. -I ::u , "lJ , '" f>- z"'O- o ~ '" (icrg .. :. Dr "lJ 0 - .2, "2. ~ CO '" '" Sl~m ~" '" o CO :E g5';:+: CO =r :E CO ~ CO ~ 0 CD Q) 0 Q.c.~ _<D~ CD '0 CD CDCD...::'.- Q. ~ c:"O ::!. iir " " CO _'" 8 " " Sco !!1. ~ '" c: Sl ~ o' 0.. " G) '" - " ~ Q."O '" a ;~ 5 co '" Q. -co 8 Dr 3 "" "0 iD ~ 6' 2- t61 ....lo. Wf\.)...... enlll -> -I en r>!=T ~ ~ m ~()",en::Ulll oc'l:J"Om- E)r-+"2.W-CC ~"'o',<)>en g5.g.~,~;il ~ ~ :s ~:::t c = ~ '" " Om :Eco3~Zi: s: co3 ~CT ~ 90 f2 5' Q. co '" G) iii 3 iii' CD CD ~-I ~::S..o m 06 -'"oc: -z '" co -':E Z :s ~ CD _. ,...... tn "0 a. g. UI "'D O'mQ'o ::a q~~_.a ~ ~amn ~ gm5.~ :::! ....l. D:I 0 a- 0 ~ a;7l::' o' Z oQococoC: > =R co Z o-(j)"OS' 0 '" -"0 ~ ~ ~ 0 *" "0 .2.:: - o a (tl 0 (J) -:::!l51~ ." (')-~o' 0 c<D<" en a-Oom == )> _. CD C. . r- ~6i -i co:=~~ CD 0 o ~ 3 o CD ~ :n ... -"" '" "" '" en", c: CT J. ~~ o '" '" ...... "" "" ww """" "'''' 00 00 )>S:"lJ1lI en)>)>> I--<en ~~s:m ;=mmlll -IZZ- _)>-10 ::UzQoG) 0 m ()"lJ m CD ()mmz '" oo::u m n ~"b$! t "lJ-I::u1"" 0' >~S:"'ll " Z"T1)>::U en"T1z0 -()<.. ()mm roO o~ Z-I o!l;! en "lJ"lJ"lJ a ~ ~ < c:0() CD g g go ffi" !:t ~ '" 3()g. 21, 0 0 a50 ~-<g "OQo3 co "T1 co "'oa 8 0 '" " -I ~"'C (') 0 ~.Q o (') c: 3 co " ~ '" r-r-r- ~en~ ~ ~ ~ cn~{;,9* C O"-"'Oll\,) ,!..u,c.nc" 0000 S'!"!"!" -000 000 .u.~~.y, ~ O....l.O>I\J c.nc.no,c.n 0000 0000 0000 0000 :- 18 l/l -< ;C ~;' -I ~ m ::ue :;!! I""N UJ~ lID"" ~ ::u '" 1lI is en o :J: m o c: I"" m en N' CD Qo en " CD n ::;; ;;' .. .. 0' " c: " ;:;: ~ c: :, .. o o .. ~ -I ~ f ~88 01""1"" al:l: ;:amm O;:a;:a >00 000 ,.,c:c: ..zz in::;!::;! :-I"'lllll c:;:a- . 00 "'ll<..z ~~!' U> -II ~z -!' > i: m o 5> z I"" > Z o en o > "'ll m lID ;ij ;:a 15 > -I a z ::u m z o ;; -I a z "'ll ::u o <.. m o -I ,,- >< -IOS O(l)Z ~8G) g@ sa ~ -I <ii m ';8 ~ < -I !!i m U> ;:0 ;; r- III -10 00 'O:J U> 0 0' =00 aJOJ OJ :J 00. 9;00 =(1) ~ -I ;:0 , "tl , w "tl"tl (I) (I) ~ ~ "tl"tl War :J :J U> U> IlOIlO CJloo '0 '0 (I) (I) 00 IT IT ~ ~ c5" O' :J :J U> U> 000 << N~ 00 00 Ill...... c o::r ~_' ~ ~ 00 00 ... ... ... N N <O-.JN '00'0 000 000 000 000 "tl OJ < (I) ~ U> ~ o ~ o o Ill... c o::r ~ ;'!::l -W .... ...... 01 ow ~-.... N~ :"-0 00 ~ ~ 16~ ~A~. r-om~ooaJaJ"tl"tl"tlIoo>~S::OG)~om ~ COOOOOOO>aJ OO~~::Or-O<1Il I Z >< III m m~OaJaJ"tl"tl"tlI-> ~::o-l-lO " ccOOO~mE~~~ Oo~mro J -o2.0cScSffS3=t 3 o.~Cin)llo g~<mmQ.-.O"(6C5 '<-zo-c Z ~~cm--(I)~OJ-3OJ ao~cU> -I -OJO:", :::a ~ ~ ::I - (C Q) a. or 2. Dr < ~~5~~c3og~m O"m~o~' ~ 3g. mmo )>o.::!'f/'J -.CDr-=rCC )> -, -. OJ OJ :J U> C 0 OJ 0 2' iil ,..,:r -I ~~ f/'Jf/'Jcnm::!.w~=r a~~~ffi' m ::I "O"Omwgmg& OJ ~O::l :::a (Jl "'!='"'!='a=oQj '^=: Ii S:ID;;: 00' - - c: CD - CD 0 r- -,j ~ar3~OJ U> ~ III Q) SCD 0 (iJ c::J ~ o CD c.... m ~.: g g. ~ . :J U> o :J_ 1Il o -10 cO =l.z ooG)~ $' c :J - o 0 Iii ::T '0 ::T ~ c 3 U> (I) o C :J a. OJ ~ c 3 00 ,... > c (Q c U> ~ 5' (I) .,.; 5' ~ OJ Iii 3_ 01 o oR. U> OJ :J a. (Q ~ :J "" (I) 0: 3 (I) OJ U> C Cil V> ~ G) iil a. (I) > m c fil -< '0 ~ C U> aJ iil :J a. N o != ~ c- OJ (Q U> 00 (I) ::: iil a. "l a. (I) '0 5' O"tl :IE OJ OJ Cil :loO o ;;!, a ~ :IE 5 :J -, '0 o (I) - ~ -I ::T o ~ :J U> ~ w (Q(Q Q!.~ Ol~ 'N ::T ' ,... ::T . ,... N- ....N '.... o ' f>~ - ~ 01' Ow ?fl. 0- -<' ~~ IlO 01 o oR. ;u (I) a. aJ OJ (Q U> mm !>> ~ W 01 <0 <0 ... WN Ol~ ow ... ... .... Co o 00 00 00 00 ... ... ... ~ -.J en W ?' ~ o .N~ 00 -.J ~~ 00 00 -IOx::03"OOaJ 5:IEOJ~'O:IE:lEc ..,m:J CDQ)m~ :J~Q)"TI:::!.~~~ m g-gel::!!mOJ- 00 =::J lIJ "'"" x ~ - (I) 3 CD ~.=CJ OJ o :J W c:. :J c.S G) C/) a. m w::T Q) 5' C/J ~ en iil OJ wwwwwwww cococccccococcco ;~.:~.:~.:~.:~~ ~ ~ .....lo.....lo.....lo.....lo.....lo.N.....lo.I\,) ~~~~~~~~ :::T::T::T::T::T::T=r::T -------- :.....:.....:.....:.....:.....:.....:.....:-. en C/) (J) VI (f) C/I (f) f/) "0"'0"0"0"0"0"'0'"0 :"" :"" :-s :"'" :"'" :"'" :"" :"" ~~~~~~~~ 90.: 00000 o f> ~ f> f> f> r r o " mmmmmmmm !>> !>> ~ !>> !>> !>> !>> !>> ~ ~ ~ WO'IWC:ONN.I:\o.W NW(O-.,jNQNN ift-Elt-ER-EAi:R-t:R-ER-t:R ....lo......lo......lo. ....lo......lo. c.now(X)~oo(X) 00000000 00000000 <M<M~~~~~~ ~ ~ COc.n01O>J:a,.NJ:lo,f\.> OOWO<OOOONOI !::l!::l:--'!'>00000l 00000000 00000000 ~~ 05' ~~ ~~ 1':::0 _0 3~ "tl OJ 3" ~ ~ ....0 ,- . ~O 02~ Q~ , (I) ::TO ~ 3. U> (I) '0 :J (I) o 3' (I) :J mm ~ !>> W 01 01 ... ... woo ....N 00 00 00 ... ... ~ ~."" co ~ 00 00 00 00 G)C o < 0:(1) (I) 0 :J OJ -1"- ~ c 3 '0 a -I ~ (I) (I) ~Ol NQ1 ,. (Q ~OJ :'J~ 00 ~ (fJ-~ 'O~ ,., Ol N'; ~~ iq"W 0- ~ ~q U> '0 ,., OJ o !!!- mm OJ OJ ....~ ...... 01.... 01 w !=>!'> 00 00 ... ... N ..,.... ow ON 00 00 I .. III -< i: ~~ -10 m- ;:00 -;:0 >0 1;;> 1/00 ~ii= o!'l ;:0-1 ~i:: ~. -" O:J: Ill> o III Im m= 0> C r-1Il m-l ;:0 m m ;;l o > " m Ul ~ C -I :;; o > -I 6 Z " ;:0 o '- m o -I ~ o - .. = n' !. Z .. 3 CD o o 3 3 o = Z .. 3 CD III i:r CD I/O III "C CD n ::;; n' .. - 0' :J C = == o ~ C = == o o .. - -I o [ (/) .,. " - o' " <l>Z !lJ~~ =n"m i'ir;~ ~z~ 6-tr- zl>D ~~C "6~ ~~~ ffi m ffi :lE!!l(/l mil/O ~l>!: a;iil~ ::j(/)cn :I:(/Ie: e: " Z ~ !ill .... m m m n z ~::~ OOr 'T1." Ci5 (') Z .... ol>m ~ r- 0 "0 Z l> Z .... n In :I: -t :::::j m em!: ODl> n e: .... i )> ~ m !i :; ::!i ~ !;; ~ )0 RO '" Z ~ -I ~ ::tJ :I:"" ,,!: III :~6 WfJ)cn e: n " :I: m m !: C m e: z r .... m - lD a: if 3 - c :: " .. j 0' " m .. ~ ~ -i ;lJ , -C l.. c: " ::;: c: " ::;: o o .. - w " 0 C3cn* _. c .,. CT " ~ -o~ -ilito ~-8 ~ w ;lJ 11l =" 11l 0. :C' 11l -C ll> < 11l 3 11l ;a s: ll> ~ .. (J) ib 11l < or co - o ~ 6' " !!!. OJ o CD ~ '" (J) if < :;' co - o ar 0. 6' " !!!. OJ o CD ~ ~ ~ 0<0 0> r ;:0 Z 11l Vi o " ..... Ol .... ..... ~ o c 5' ,.. n o c: '0 ib .. < ll> :;;:- 11l ..... 161en....w.Al~a (J))> CD ::;" 11l;lJ :5. CD ::J == col1l -- 9.< CD e!. 0.< _, 11l o )> " '" !!!.'" OJl1l o 3 CD Q: '< . -i o a '" '" o (J) 11l .. iD' '" OJ iil '" '" m ib g. .. 5' (J) !!!. :;' o 0: < ll> :;;:- 11l C}C}C}C} a a a a -nen><>< ffJC5"P"P o"'C~~ O;lJoo (J)><-c-c CD "'C 0 0 :::::!. 0 "C "0 m "9 C: C: "'TIC:"'C "'0 _'0 ;lJ ;lJ o (J) 0 0 O"C -_ a. ...., 0 0 OJll>-<-< c:'< C'(J)(J)(J) Q:m~~ CD :::!. ffi' co' ...., m en UJ CDQm~m~m~~~5'~~~'saUJ~.~~-~~~~n ~m~o~o~o""'-~UJ~~cr~~CD~~Q....,....,Q~o :::r CD Dl _. OJ _. Q) _. a. ""'-J ~ or ;: ~ CD ..... =j" UJ m ...., ""'0 0 0 0 5 en::J ~ ~ ~CD~ro=~ro""'o~' ~~~~XXOCD 0:8 5 J:~::I:~ :c~-c.c: CD a.~~ ~~o =- 2:"'0 "'C~ n 11l__~_~_~_~<"~<",.. "'O"'ONww~< OOCD-CD-CD-~~~.~ S'CD-'UJ-'~CD@,A8~QJ -~g~g~g~UJ~~UJ~~o~i~::J~.~"'C91 o~ 3 ::,- Dr I or I W I "'0 ::e ::I ~. ;:::t: ::I Q. CD = 3 0 "'C r::: :::0 :c ::I: ::I CD CDUJ....,O....,O....,OCD-._~CD_O....,cr ....,5.....,X""'O"'C~::e ~~::eor::eor::eDr~.~O-.Nq....,aCD~.~.~CD~~' ~' ::E=;' Q) = m en CD en CD en :::!'I Ul ;:::l 0 - (') <. _'"0 ""0 _ (') N _. _. ::J CDcZS.encZS.encZS.en t3:E"" Q) m"" &. <: ,::::j" CD 0 0 "U- ~ =rc.5 a~~~~~~~g~.g~'oo~~~"U~en,i~~~~~o <::J~0~0~o::J~~3~~_~~'a~'nCD~~~~a ~BOooOooOooen~<gm'<~~~'3c.5~~~~~~~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "0 ~ Ia. (ii' ~ a ~ =t.g ~ ~ ~ 'go ~ ~"Co ~ _ ~ ~ ~ CDCD OCDO'O ~~~ 00 ~ ~ ~..., CD_ ::J~3::!'CDm<C"U"C"C::J3 .~c ~g<agCD~ ~30'0000CDQ) ...... ..., _ Q) -. :: en _ "C "0 "C ::J '" ac- <?<<g?<~'~~~."U::Jc:c:c:urCD co Q)"Um<"U~>5'_0<i"O"O"O' ~. "11l <"o~Q)an=",oennx->< CD 0 - -"0 - """ enax~~ ~'~ Q~.s:~ 11l 11l 11l 11l 11l ~ "H'H" ~ OlW 0>0 ~Cow "'0>0 .....<00 ~oo 000 m !l' r :n 0> o '" ~ m '" o '" ~ ;." 0> ~ o o r :n .... o '" '" .... '" o '" <0 m ~ o o , :n 0> o '" '" Ji>. o o '" ~ <0 '" ~ o o mm !>> !>> W <0 "'''' '" en'" ~:J:t. 00 00 "'''' .....'" en ~ 00l 00 00 m ll> -mmmmm ~ !>> !>> !>> ~ !>> E ~ 11l r ll> ro w ...,0l~0l~ ~())OlNCO~ :P~-En--En- ~-En- '0 :;' COw 5'~ :J:o 11l 0 ll> ~-En-~~ ~ ~ o o '" ~ e~(..)w~ -......loot..> ~ ()) ~O-......lCOO oom""'-Jo 00000 00000 ~ o '" .... Ol en '" o ....m ow 00 00 0> 010 wo 00 00 '" .... '" en o '" o o '" o " -< ~ o S- a or (J) 8 .. '0 5' lh -< ~ ~ -i m ;:u > r- en SIO ~ ;:u " III 6 (/) o :r m c c: r- m 05j g ;:u ~C5 CD~ .. 6 z ~ -I m ;:u > r- (/) c CD .. " .. -6' - 0' " en N' CD SIO (/) "0 .,. " ::;; n' .. - 0' " c: " ::;: ~ c: " ::;: o ~ - -i o [ 16/ -l ::0 , 'U l.. 4l8< ~ ~ji:~ enCllC CD=-._ 3i::0 O(=j::O ')>O~ ;::r-C ac." om:!: 2.::0> O>OCll WOm 01:= Qz):.. ~'~ en CIl I: "'tI "'tI r- in C "'tI ~ c.... m o -l :::j m s: CIl I: '0 lC ~ III C. (ll S- o.> '" (f) ![ 5' ::> o o ::> ~ CD ~ d ~ r- "'tI ::0 o c.... m o -l o o CIl -l CIl CIl c S:m [0> 0." o c ::> ~ "'tI ... .2, CD .... ~<:n ..g CD, 30 III 0 ~ .... '" -." '" :-' ~ o .... .... -en "'0 00 0, ' 0 80 16 I AIR December 18, 2007 Prepared by: Danyl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Tessie Sillery, Operations Coordinator, Collier County Department of Altemative Transportation Modes Radio Road MSTU Proiect Status (R-15) ACTIVE (Darryl Richard); Quote for 'By County' Items Bid 08-5004; Quote request per Contract 07-4083 "On call Electrical Repairs and New Installation - County Wide" (material Group 93972; Contractors: 115198 Hart's Electricallnc; 112810 American Electric of Miami Inc; 100913 EB Simmonds Electric; 115640 Mizpah Electric; 103553 Paragon Electric Systems; 102779 Southwest Electric) 12-17-07: Final Quote from Ag Tronix received for materials cost. 12-18-07: Bid/Quote Package sent to Purchasing & McGee & Associates; McGee to confIrm content of quote package and make recommendation and/or release for bidding. ( R - 14) - ACTIVE & ONGOING-Landscape Maintenance Contract (POC: Darry Richard) Contract #05-3686 Part II Radio Road MSTUIMSTD Roadway Grounds Maintenance. MSTU FUND: 158 (old 150)-162545-634999-600811 THIS PO IS FOR MSTU FUND (150) ONL YlNotice To Proceed (P, 0, #4500048335) MSTD FUND: 112-163652-634999-620141 THIS PO IS FOR MSTD FUND ONL Y Contract Expiration Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 Notice To Proceed (P, 0, #4500048336) 7-28-05: Original NTP for Contract issued (I year initial contract; 3 renewal periods of I year) 2-20-07: ConfIrmation of repair of Irrigation Mainline on Devonshire Fund 158 (MSTU) 10-12-07: New Fiscal Year 07/08 - NTP given with PO, 10-16-07: Committee motioned for Advance must attend meetings, 11-20-07: Contract Section: Contractor's Attendance states: CONTRACTOR'S MEETING A TIENDANCE "During the Contract Period, the Contract Manager or an Advisory Committee if applicable, may have questions concerning maintenance issues, The Contractor shall be required to attend monthly meetings and other special meetings that the Contract Manager should require, There shall be no additional charge for attendance to these meetings, If the Contractor fails to attend the monthly meetings without an excused absence an amount equal to two (2) hours of the supervision labor rate as listed on the Bid Page shall be deducted from the monthly billing of the Contractor against the Contract total." 11-20-07: Advanced Lawn has confIrmed attendance at monthly meetings as per staff request. (R - 13) - ACTIVE & ONGOING (PaC: Tessie Sillery) - Annual Services Contract: McGee & Associates 9-19-06: Radio Road MSTU Committee Approved proposal from McGee in the amount of: $11,445,00 for annual consulting services. 11-3-06: NTP was given to McGee & Associates with a Project Completion Date - September 30, 2007. 9-30-07: PO Rolled into FY07-08, 10-19-07: Committee Approved Annual Contract with McGee $ $11,950,00 11-7-07: County staff requested McGee to revise proposal. 11-20-07: Work Order has been submitted for staff review, Approval of Work Order and PO issue pending, 12-11-07: PO and WO issued Notice To Proceed (P, 0, #4500089487)- WO # TLO-MA-3614-08-04 Project Name: " Annual LA. Consulting Services"; Fund # 153-162521 - Golden Gate MSTU December 11, 2007 , based on Work Order Completion date is: December 10, 2008. 1 16/ A18 (R- 12B) &(R-16) (Combined Bidding) - ACTlVE- LANDSCAPE & IRRIGA TION PROJECT (Pac: Danyl Richard) - Radio Road MSTU: (pbase One & Pbase II-A) Landscape & Irrigation - Add Corporate (CO Pending) PROJECT SCHEDULE: Radio Road MSTU: (Phase One & Phase II-A) Landscape & Irrigation FYI: PHASE Start. End Date PROJECT SCHEDULE: PHASE 100"10 Submittal 21 DAY BIDDING BID DUE BCC APPR NTP Material Purchase 90 DAY (Material Purcbase & Irrigation Install) CONST-COMPLETE NTP CONST 90 DAY CONST CONST -COMPLETE Start - End Date 9/21/2007 10/5/2007-11/6/2007 11/6/2007 12/11/2007 1/16/2008 1/16/08-4/14/08 4/14/2008 4/15/2008 4/15/08-7/15/08 7/15/2008 (Irrigation, and Plantings) - Work Order for Design to be initiated in FY-06 (October 1,2005); Construction Cost: $810,000,00; Design Cost: $64,300,00 McGee & Associates 4-10-07: Re-use availability is questionable at this time, Roger Dick reports it may be wise to wait until re- use line is run up to Radio Road as part of current Santa Barbara Project. 4-13-07: Discussion with Roger Dick and Pam Lulich indicate that Re-Use department supplements Re- Use with Well water during 3 months of the year (typically April, May, and June), Thus water staining may occur during these 3 months of the year to existing curbing and/or other structures over-sprayed with irrigation water. 4-17-07: McGee recommends mixing tanks for project. Committee votes to add mixing tanks to project. 5-23-07: McGee recommends not adding Corporate Section to project at this time as it is not entirely curbed with Type F Curbing, 7 -19-07: Overall Committee consensus - not to include Corporate Section into Phase 1- Landscape and Irrigation. 7-23-07: 90% plans - still pending - no plans 8-22-07 90% plans - still pending - no plans 9-12-07 : 100% plans received for bidding - pending Purchasing 11-07-07: Bid 08-5004 -received on 11-6-07 - Hannula low bidder- Bid tabs are pending, 11-20-07: Bid Tabulation received from Purchasing Dept. Hannula is low bid for both base bid ($363,957,06) and alternates ($100,477.56) 12-11-07: Contract approved by BCC on 12-11-07- Awarding Hannula, 12-17 -07: Awaiting Contract issue through purchasing, (R- 21) - COMPLETE- (POC: Darryl Richard)- 9-19-07 - Dale Lewis moved to direct Staff to ensure numbers are re-stenciled on each island. Second by Betty Schedule, Motion carried unanimously 4-0, 10-16-07: Staff verified - stenciling is in the contract with Bonness 2 16/ A 18 Median stenciling delayed until completion of curbing project - additional 20 days was added to the schedule on curbing project, Median Numbers will be reviewed upon completion of Bonness Curbing Project. 12-15-07: Bonness completed painting of numbers on curbing as per Radio Road Curbing Project (R - 12A) - COMPLETE- (Pac: Darryl Richard)- Radio Road MSTU: Phase One - Curbing (Devonshire to Broadview Dr) (Curbing, Irrigation, and Plantings) - Work Order for Design to be initiated in FY-06 (October 1,2005); Construction Cost: $810,000,00; Design Cost: $64,300.00 McGee & Associates PROJECT SCHEDULE: Radio Road MSTU: Phase One - Curbing (Devonshire to Broadview Dr) PHASE Start - End Date DESIGN 9/11/06-1/29/07 14 DAY Quotes from Annual Contract 5/11/2007-5/25/2007 BID DUE 5/25/2007 BCC APPR 6/26/2007 NTP CONST 7/17/2007 90 DAY CONST 10/15/2007 CONST-COMPLETE 10/15/2007 12-15-05-McGee sent notice to go 'on hold' for Project. 3-06-06 - McGee to revise scope of project as per Don Scott, 3-20-06 - McGee sent 'Go Ahead' on Work Order. 4-4-06-McGee submits request to modify work order in amount of $6,696.00 (submit for Committee Approval) 5-1-06; Radio Road Curbing Plan 30% Submittal Review is pending, May 2, 2006 meeting to address Access Management issues. 5-15-06; Access mgmt. Meeting on 5-3-06 : as per Diane Flagg project will be phased into Phases I and Phase ll, Dale Bathon confirming with funding from transportation and Don Scott confirming with Transportation Administration, 5-30-06; Project is to include 3 phases, mcgee & assoc, to provide scope for phase 1. - Pending Phase 1- From (Devonshire - West to western most boundry of Berkshire Lakes Subdivision) Phase II - From ( Western most boundary of Bershire to Livingston) Phase III - From (Livingston to Airport) 6-12-06: McGee & Associates preparing proposal for phase I, and waiting on fmal billing on old work order. 6-27-06: Need McGee proposal for phase 1. 7-12-06: Need McGee proposal for phase 1. 8-4-06: MSTU approved McGee Proposal for Phase I 8-22-06: Work Order for McGee Phase I is in process of SAP upload. PO number is pending, NTP is anticipated by August 24, 2006, 8-25-06: Diane Flagg request verification that the Total Amount spent will not exceed the original Work Order Amount of $64,300,00 (versus new proposal for: $17,330,00) 9-11-06: McGee & Associates sends correspondence in response to Staff request for confirmation of anticipated cost for consulting for Phase I, ll, and III combined, Copy provided for September 19, 2006 Radio Road MSTU regular meeting, 9-11-06: Notice to Proceed issued to McGee & Associates for Phase One Project; TLO-MA-3614-06-16; p, 0, #4500066290; Total net project is $17,330.02; Work Order time-line of 140 days with Project Start Date is September 11,2006 and Project End Date is January 29, 2007, 3 161 9-19-06: TECM Engineer Dale Bathon submits proposal for advancement of a portion of Phase 11 Project into the Phase I project scope from Livingston Rd, to Kings Way, The Radio Road MSTU Committee votes to not include this section in Phase I Project. Phase One project schedule: Design Complete January 29, 2007; Bidding Phase February 2007; BCC Approval of Award March 13,2007; NTP April 30, 2007; Construction 120 time-line with Completion by August 30, 2007 11-21-06: McGee 100% submittal for Curbing Phase I has been rejected by TECM Engineers - TECM recommends Sub-Consultant Engineer for Curbing Plans, TECM requires Signed & Sealed Plans by State Licensed Engineer prior to approval. 1-16-07 Proposal from McGee for Sub Consultant - to be reviewed by Committee 1-17-07 Committee approved McGee for Sub Consultant - $ 2,510,00 1-29-07: Called and left message for Consultant to revise spreadsheet on costs. 2-13-07: McGee revised spreadsheet included in proposed Change Order # l. 2-20-07: Change Order #1 is being reviewed by Staff for approval. Inclusion of Engineer Sub-consultant is only item in Change Order. 3-8-07: NTP for Change Order # l. 3-20-07: Formal Request sent to McGee for confIrmation of delivery of 100% Drawings prior to 3-30-07 4-16-07: Coordination meeting for Public Meeting to be held May I" from 5 to 7 PM, 100% plans (revised) pending from McGee, 5-2-07: TECM revisions as per PIM Meeting forwarded to McGee, Revision due by 5/10/07, 6-19-07: Novus item - 16B - BCC meeting of 6-26-07 - Bonness, Inc. $ 433,885.43 7-10-07: Bcc approved, - PO request submitted on - 6-27-07 with Signed Work Order, 7-10--07: Pending release from purchasing for PO, 7-17--07: NTP given to Bonness 7-18-07: Discussed overall project with Bonnes & set up weekly meetings - beginning August 3,d 8-22-07: Root pruning to magnolia trees - ETI - trees to be moved upon receipt afPO- pending BA. 9-10-07: Budget Amendment processed by Gloria and we received PO for ETI on 9-4-07. 9-18-07: Change Order # 1 pending 10-22-07: Change Order Processed and notification went out to McGee & Assoc. 11-07-07: Change Order #1 pending. (R-20) -COMPLETE - (I'.O,C DaITvl) - Root Pruning & Removal and relocation of Trees on Radio Road 8-22-07: Notice to Proceed - ETI - $1,750 for root pruning and within 3 weeks (after BA) is approved the PO will be increased with the difference, ($8,530,00 is the total amount of estimate) 9-10-07: Week of9-24th to 28th - anticipation of moving trees, - pending locates 9-24-07: Darryl met in fIeld with ETI and to be completed by 9-26-07, 9-26-07: Project Completed (R-20) -COMPLETE - (l'.O,c. Darryl) - Root Pruning & Removal and relocation of Trees on Radio Road 8-22-07: Notice to Proceed - ETI - $1,750 for root pruning and within 3 weeks (after BA) is approved the PO will be increased with the difference, ($8,530,00 is the total amount of estimate) 9-10-07: Week of9-24th to 28th - anticipation of moving trees, - pending locates 9-24-07: Darryl met in fIeld with ETI and to be completed by 9-26-07. 9-26-07: Project Completed (R - 17) - COMPLETE -TECM-Radio Road - (phase II-A) Curbing - Brairwood to Commercial & Corporate (INFORMATION ONLY) R-19) - COMPLETE - (P,O,C. Darryl) Corporate Square Pavers (P. O. #4500082550; dated 8/6/2007); Work Order: BC-FT-3773-0710- (60 day Work Order) completion date October 6, 2007 4 A 1p 16/ A 18 7-23-07- Requested for Quote from Bonness for project 8-7-07: Notice to Proceed 9-10-07: To be completed by 9-11-07 9-11-07 : Project Complete (R - 15) - COMPLETE, RE-USE WATER PROJECT PERMITTING PHASE (Pac: Darryl Richard) 3-08-07: Updated application for Re-Use Gallons per minute and approval pending 4-10-07: Re-use availability is questionable at this time, Roger Dick reports it may be wise to wait until re- use line is run up to Radio Road as part of current Santa Barbara Project. 4-13-07: Discussion with Roger Dick and Pam Lulich indicate that Re-Use department supplements Re- Use with Well water during 3 months of the year (typically April, May, and June). Thus water staining may occur during these 3 months of the year to existing curbing and/or other structures over-sprayed with irrigation water. 4-17-07: McGee recommends mixing tanks for project. Committee votes to add mixing tanks to project. 4-27-07: Utilities confinns that RE-USE Application has been approved and will forward hardcopy, 5-7-07: Re-Use Application is approved, Hardcopy scanned and forwarded to Mike McGee. ( R - 19) - COM PLETE- Painting of Radio Road Median Tips with Numbers - The median tips (bull- nose) are to be painted yellow in accordance with FDOT standards with median numbers, 10-17-06: Committee approves not to exceed $2,500,00 for project. Directs staff to utilize annual contractor. Trutwin annual is active for painting within ROW, 10-23-06: Direction to utilize 'in house' Road & Bridge Department funds and resources for project. Given that the medians are 'County Properly', 11-20-06: John Vliet, Road & Bridge rejected plans to paint curb #'s on Radio Road, 11-20-06: Staff requested quote for Trutwin to paint curb #'s on Devonshire. 1-3-07: PO & NTP to Trutwin 1-29-07: Project Complete (R-II) COMPLETE - SDP PLAN REQUEST; SDP 3425 Radio Road - Plan review by Committee for Landscape Plans submitted for development. 11-21-06: This SDP Plan does not affect MSTUIMSTD plantings or irrigations, (R - 15) - COMPLErE - Pavers for Foxfrre Medians 9-19-06: Radio Road MSTU votes to install pavers at the median tips (bull-nose) for the West Median and East Median at Foxfrre, 9-19-06: Staff request Quote from Bonness for the paver installation, 10-10-06: Staff receives quote from Bonness in the amount of $9,257,70, Request to Purchase submitted, 11-6-06: Begin Construction of project by Bonness, [nc, pavers to match existing specification, 11-10-06: Project Completed ( R - 18) - COMPLETE - Radio Road Median Irrigation Conversion - Allamanda and Plumago Planting Beds to be converted from drip line system to irrigation spray heads on risers. 10-17-06: Committee approves of conversion based on 112 funding no motion necessary, Mike McGee advises Committee and Staff that conversion is necessary to ensure plant health, 10-30-06: Median irrigation conversion is progressing, irrigation mainline break is repaired during project. 11-6-06: Project Complete; Inspection for Punch-List to follow Nov, 6 to 9 for proper operation, (R-IO) COMPLETE - SDP 7405 Devonshire Blvd- Plan review by Committee for Landscape Plans submitted for development. 9-25-06: Plans reviewed with ROW, Contractor has removed shrubs on County ROWand will be required to replace shrubs and damaged irrigation system. 10-17-06: Copy of Plans provided for Committee review. Landscaping found to be satisfactory. (R-17) - COMPLETE - Committee Chairman request for infonnation regarding 'loan' to MSTU 5 161 A 18 9-19-06; Radio Road MSTU Committee Chairman request staff provide a report on options available to the MSTU in so far as a 'loan' or advancement of funds. (I) What is the maximum amount? (2) Is there any interest? (3) What is the amount of time allowed for repayment? 10-17-06: Staff provides answer as per discussion with Budget: (I) Maximum amount is determined by 'Project Need' which would be after all cost considerations are identified. Review and approval by County Manager's Office/ County Attomey's Office Required; (2) Interest on loan would be negotiated through County Manager's Office and County Attorney; (3) Amount of time for repayment would be negotiated through County Manager's Office and County Attorney; Note: The advancement of funds requires Board of County Commissioner's approval. (R- 14) - COMPLETE -Request from TECM Engineer Dale Bathon - Phase II Project item 9-19-06: Dale Bathon submits plans for a section of Phase II project (Livingston Rd, to Kings Way) for inclusion into Phase I project. 9-19-06: Radio Road MSTU Committee votes not to include Phase II item into Phase I project. (R-9) CANCELLED -Well Water Mitigation (Chemical Treatment of Well Water)- Cancelled- September 12, 2005: 8/16/05 committee cancelled project, Cost was determined to be excessive for annual maintenance of filtration system, (R - 8) - COMPLETE -Milage Rate (,25 vs .50) - Dale Lewis requested for the history at the Budget (Cany Forward vs Audit - follow up meeting) with all the MSTU Chairman - 7-17-06 8-22-06: Sharon Newman's report is pending, 8-25-06: Norman Feder, Transportation Administrator accepts responsibility for the adjustment of the Millage Rate from ,50 to ,25 (during FY-04 to FY-05), The Radio Road MSTU Committee may vote to increase Millage back to ,50 for the FY-08 Budget Request. Currently the Radio Road Project Funds are sufficient for current project demands, (R -7) - COMPLETE: - Devonshire Maintenance (Fund 150)-Advanced Lawn Estimate 06-191; On August 4,2006, By Committee Action, Committee approved $17,290,00 for items included in Advanced Lawn estimate for Devonshire Maintenance (Fund 150), Scope of project is stump grinding, Vibumum replacement and incidental irrigation repairs (included in quote, as per Frank Kip, owner) 8-24-06; Advanced Lawn Crews begin stump Grinding 8-25-06; Mike Luneke, Advanced Lawn confirms that stump grinding is at 100% completion, Staff to inspect. Advanced Lawn will fmish planting of Vibumum by 8-26-06, 8-31-06: Project is complete (R- 6) - COMPLETE - Radio Road Maintenance (Fund 112) -Advanced Lawn Estimate 06-184, 06-185, and 06-186; On August 4, 2006, Committee reviewed items included in Advanced Lawn estimate for Radio Road Maintenance (Fund 112), Scope of project is replacement of Juniper Plants, installation of mulch material, and installation of irrigation components, 8-25-06; Mike Luneke, Advanced Lawn confirms that project is at 100% completion, Staffto inspect. (R-5) COMPLETE - PROJECT TRANSFERRED TO CAT FUNDING-CAT Bus Shelter (R-4) -COMPLETE- Sod Refurbishment at median I Radio Road at Santa Barbara -COMPLETE - Advanced Lawn. (R-3) -COMPLETE-Pump Repair -Radio Road- COMPLETE; Repair By County (R-2) -COMPLETE-Annual Maintenance Contract Bidding- July 28, 2005: NTP Contract 05-3686 Part II, issued to Advanced Lawn Maintenance - Completed (R-I) COMPLETE -ARBORIST SERVICES CONTRACT; Committee requested McGee to provide quote for arborist services. McGee Scope for Arborist Services cannot be approved as per LA 04-3614, 6 161 A Landscape Architectural Services Fixed, Terms and Conditions, Additional Quotes requested as per Committee Direction. 4-17-06; Davey Tree Company is low quote at $15,350,00 for both consultation and maintenance,(submit for Committee Action) 5-1-06; Documentation for Request to Purchase submitted. PO is pending, 5-15-06: Project complete with Field Inspection pending 5-30-06 Inspection complete - contractor to perform additional final pruning late fall, 6-27-06: Final pruning in fall to be done 7 18 - '2 ::;) , !:>. --~ 1- ~ , I i I ! ~II ~I 'Vi <1l ,<,2 > :;; if> I- &ll ;; '-'; 01 ':;:: ;3-1 0::1',; ..- ,S;; a. ' ~~ i a.: z': ~ cO CDi;... ,~I !~i~ g ~i :a::i =, 0, w ~ 0 0:"::1 ~ull;1 l~ ~!~ >-i ro fJ -s, ~;...::: ell:: ~I ::i;c..:'E S9 _ O!C(:.~ 01 WL U'r-' (0"1 O'JI 0:::1 Q) 0 Trli.=:: c I (/) a.. c: OJ .::::: wi iE .2"..- c E :J l.L -@:Wi"e- ~ I ~Ii.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ::2o'''Q) '-' o C/)Q.)CU-o..:2~ .- I c:..... 0 01 0. >lc,2 Q)'-IQ. , - W 1-1 0 ! Cl) I Q..! 0 ::r I lu Z Z,O'E Q.)jO,Qi I~ 0 ~_C) \- <.)1~!OI '..u OiO ill"> i'> ~~UI'2::CO w"'" Q) E<("Q)i3(/)~V) ," :J::W'I(f) Q) co Q) co ..= a.. :J!.~ ~ ::2 - u - 0 ..JI.;:; ll) i5',-'5 ~<(OIa5a:::<l)=:g III 0 UI- OI_ l- e::: --; ~ ~ ~ y:~ c: 0:) ....,::-,........ ...... ,2 _ ..: <i: ;<i:<i:<i: <i: t) Cieri ' i ' 4l <( i . <Il 0::\::;:, ..- C'J M -.:t-,t{)' ----+- -----;---'- -- -I 0::' 16 I ~18 " - '" - ,_., '5 i iwi ..,j - ~ '- o I- ~ 0: 0011 ,3 ~Ii :U wi, I~' ',1-'1" 151 i-I 03-';::' '1--'- r:ti :U1c U5 ;,wll-E OCI :""') 0 v 01n ..., ,.,.,'-','....... "a: 11251;::; 10- C0 IUJ CU! J.) ':J U5 -g 0.1 <D i "-'" ,a........,tli '::)1 c' = <Il15.!,-, ' - \-,Q) _ o'e: I- 01-= 20).= ::;)1'" '" Ooe Ui'- '- ~11.s .s ~'o .-.. !!:il!~ ~ ..J :,'" C0 ..J'U () 0'_ - U';- >- ....,Ij~,] ~Ii~,~ f-: 10) IU) ~l ! ~'; . ~ N 0::'0:: I --~--'--,- I 1-----1-- ! I , 000001'0 '00 C 00000 0 alo 0 U; i~l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ll' i~ll~l~l ~l ~ I':I~ ~-""/ ~.\ ,"". <D'i~1 I~-I : ~ I)_I ~IY>' -1..",:L _,_ I 1"'1-.,.[ ,~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I~ ~Il I~ (J !ooooc-' 'o::::i :00,'-1 0 _ '0. o. 0.""."". "I Iwl N ""I" !u ~ ;- ~ ~ 111 to 1'5-1 !~! :1l1- to- '5-! 't; -------j --1---,- ~ '0 1 ~;w I~I~!W~WW'~ U ~:~~, i~ ; ----+-,--->--- -;----1 g; 1 i W 1 -------~--I-: ~i--1 ~ co co! eni co! cui ail ,001 cui m! 51 ia.. W.I..LJ!WiWIW1o:::! -'~! ._~-i~!uOI---'-;;}, -----;-~~--:i >0: 'e::: "'- _I 1 ---c---:_- ----'~- "; I- i;- ;-i......i'\"""";...-j c:,::r: ,............~, C I I : I, "'I ,I- ,-' 1-' 1 18 I~ 'I~I I ! ~~, ~! -: -i- I- (fJ <Ii 0 . U :;;: I- <ii' u - U1 ,8 .., ..Q 0 ,0:: (j) ,,.,' ','......' , , , ' -------------------- , ' ~ >- '" '" ~i ;i ,- e! 'iiil ~, ~i c:: o '..l il' 'E! , s:i~ '" ~ !!: ~ 0) 0 ~ U ~ ~ =13 -5 =' ';;: "'I > "Ci -g,:.a .~ ~ u- o en en '" en C '" ,,= E e en - C <ii '" > .'!:: o E ~, Q) ~, '- 'Os:: ~,~ '-ien a;,QJ :C'~ :::I .:: f.ni"O c: '0 ..Q en '" - '" ,!,: '0 U),: w'- .....11 i ,01'::::' 2'<(' I I !----'--- 0::: ~i , , --t-T-----:--'---'- , u~-i ---------~_. 010 gl ~I 16 I 00 Ala 00 0 0 0 0 .".- '" '" 01 '" '" OJ ~-! '" '" '" "'I 0 0 '" (/) - 0 0 E l- '" ., (/) 0 0 0 .. 0 u 0 0 .". '" - U ,;: u " '" '" ., l- :::l '" '" '~ u 0 ~ UJ ~o.. ..., >- 0 - ~ " ::l a. 0 ..J U <( ,;: '" l- OJ OJ - 0 :::l W W 0 l- - .c -, (/) " (5 f.J ;:: ., .c ~ >- OJ U5 E N '0 ('0 ~ .s ;;; (J) E v " OJ .2 C'> '" ~ =- <ll ::l ;: ;; 'f 0.. (/) " cC :;: - '" .. r-- UJ s: l- u '" '" ~ l- '" - U ::l " ., 0 UJ ~ u ..., ., ~ >. 0 .c 0 - ~ - :0 0 0.. .c " .. - '" c '3 '" UJ UJ '0 ::; '0 .c ., 0.. - '" 0.. '" " '<:3 .c 0 :::l - (/) 0 E -.;: '" '" ,9- >- 0 '" 0 ,,; ~ l- "2- '" ~ ~ - E u 2: " '" '" '" :::l 0 '0 E ., ., 0 " OJ :> ,;: C UJ if) ~ ., 0 '0 - (/) u Ol ,;: E <( OJ a. ., E a::: '2 '" ~ !!! '" :I: :;: ., a. UJ 0 " .c 0 .. ::; a " i!: c .?= '" - '0 ..J :;; ., - '" m <( 0 ;;; - u N '" ., 0 u '" u ~- - a::: (,) ,- .c '" " ::; ro '0 ::l '-' 0 E " (/) -= '" ii 0 ...: ';:: UJ -.;: C " t5 " '-' (/) U) l- '" <( ,.,"" 0 .. en a::: ::;; if) W 2: <i' a::: ~ ~; >a:::~ ~ AG.TRONIX SPECL\IJU(IIN MOTOllOU IRRIGATION CONTllOl. SYsroIs 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239-657-5519 16/ A 18 QUOTA TION/PROPOSAL -" DATE QUOTE NO, 1ln/2007 832 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOA 1M!fransportation 2885 HorsesOOe Drive South Naples, FI. 34104 RECEIVED DEe 1 C 2007 Transportation ATM Dept. TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SLT ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL REVISED 12/17107 per conversation wJMike McGee Radio Road Phase I Landscape lrrigation Project Bid#08-5004 Controller PI & C4 PI .8 Scorpio AC 8 Station w/Radio in Large Double Door Cabinet F2848A UHF(450-470MHz) Scorpio AC 2in/80utwl HT750 I 1,325,00 1,325,00 Radio 800.()365 12v Power Supply LDA50F 4.3amp 1 100,00 100,00 800-7106 H-IN-5 AC Power Cable I 0,00 0,(1) 800-711l H-OU-9 DC Power Cable I 0,00 0,(1) SB-24DSS SS Enclosure DD 24W X 36H 24D I 2,280.00 2,280,00 PED-24DSS SS Pedestals 24W X 12H X 20D I 585,00 585,00 MLB-8-AC Surge Protector AC 2in/8out I 266.50 266.50 85836 Low Profile Aot UHF 450-470 MHZ I 90,00 90,00 51020-WM Leviton S urge Protection I 176,00 176,00 8299-AW GFI W!Switch Leviton (l5Amp) I 39,00 39,00 T-II Single Gang Box I 0,00 0,00 Controller C4- Scorpio 16 Station wlRaclio (18" Cahinet) F2848A UHF(450-470MHz) Scorpio AC 2in/8outwl HI750 1 1,325,00 1,325,00 Radio FLN2154A Scorpio AC VO Expansion Kit I 225,00 225.00 800-0365 12v Power Supply LDA50F 4.3amp I 100,00 100.00 Thank you for )Qur business. TOTAL QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS, SIGNATURE Page 1 AG.TRONIX SPEClAUZING IN MOlOROl.\ IRRIGAnON CONnloL mIlS 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239-657-5519 18 QUOTA TION/PROPOSAL 16/ A DATE QUOTE NO, 11n/200? 832 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOA lMffransportation 2885 Horsesooe Drive South Naples, Fl. 34104 RECEIVED i"iEe i e 2007 Transportation ATM Dept. TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SLT ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL 800-7106 H-lN-5 AC Po""r Cable 1 0,00 0,00 800.7111 H-OU-9 DC Power Cable 1 0,00 0,00 SB-18SS SS Enclosure 18W X 36H X 12D 1 1,290,00 1,290,00 SB-18SS SS Enclosure 18W X 36H X lID I 1,290,00 1.290,00 MLB-8-AC Surge Protector AC 2ini80ut 2 235,00 470,00 85836 Low Profile Ant UHF 450-470 MHZ 1 90,00 90,00 51020-WM Leviton Surge Protection 1 189,00 189,00 8299-AW GFl W!Switch Leviton (l5Amp) 1 39,00 39,00 T-ll Single Gang Box 1 0,00 0,00 Thank you for )Our business. TOTAL $9,879,50 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS, SIGNATURE Page 2 AG.TRONIX SPEClAUlINllH MOTOROlA 1RRI1iA11OH COImIol S'mEHS 1304 N. 15th STREET lMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239-657-5519 161 AIR QUOTA TION/PROPOSAL DATE QUOTE NO, Un/200? 833 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOA 1MITransportation 2885 Horsesooe Drive South Naples, Fl. 34104 RECEIVED [ C"- 1 (\ ~007 ~J... !) 1... I TransportatIon ATM Dept. TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SLT ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL REVISED 12117/07 Radio Road Phase II Landscape Irrigation Project Bid#08-5004 Controller C2 & Existing Controller C4 @GlennEagle Controller C2- Scorpio 32 Station wlRadio in Double Door Cabinet The bid calls fQr upgrade of 16 station Scorpio Controller to a 32 station. The cabinet is not big enough and is not to Collier County current standards. Please see attached pictures. Recommendation: Ccntractor to remove existing controller and make arrangements for delivery to Ag- Tronix. Ag- Tronix will rein~iall controller in large double door cabinet with new surge boards and power equipment. The Scorpio controller will be upgrared to a 32 station Scorpio and ready for delivery to the county, for installation. by a contractor. F2805A Scorpio V2 AC 2 in/8 out I 800,00 800,00 FLN2154A Scorpio AC VO Expansion Kit I 225,00 225,00 800-0365 12v Power Supply LDA50F 4.3amp I 100,00 100,00 800-7106 H-lN-5 AC Power Cable 1 0,00 0,00 800-7111 H-OU-9 DC Power Cable I 0,00 0,00 SB-24DSS SS Enclosure DD 24W X 36H 24D I 2,280,00 2,280,00 Thank you for )Our business. TOTAL QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS, SIGNATURE Page 1 AG.TRONIX SPICWJ1ING IN MoToROU IRRIGATION CONTROL S1sTI:MS 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239-657-5519 161 A 10 QUOTATION/PROPOSAL DATE QUOTE NO, lln/2007 833 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOA TMffransportation 2885 Horsesooe Drive South Naples, FI. 34104 RECEIVED DEe 1 C 2007 TransportatIOn ATM Dapt. TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net30 SLT ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL PED-24DSS SS Pedestals 24W X 1211 X 20D I 585.00 585,00 MLB-8-AC Surge Protector AC 2in/8out 4 266.50 1,066,00 85836 Low Profile Aot UHF 450-470 MHZ 1 90,00 90,00 51020-WM Leviton Surge Protection 1 176,00 176,00 8299-A W GFI W/Switch Leviton (15Amp) 1 39,00 39,00 T-ll Single Gang Box 1 0,00 0,00 Existing Irrinet to upgrade from 32 station to 48 station. Please see attached picture referring to Irrinet Glenn Eagle. The old cabinet does not meet Collier COlUlty current standards. Recommendation: Contractor to remove existing controller and make arrangements for delivery to Ag~Tronix. Ag-Tronix will reinstall controller in large double door cabinet with new surge boards and power equipment. The Irrinet controller will be upgraded to a 48 station and ready fer delivery to the county, for installation by a contractor. SB-24DSS SS Enclosure DD 24W X 3611 24D 1 2,280.00 2,280,00 PED-24DSS SS Pedestals 24W X 1211 X 20D 1 585,00 585,00 85836 Low Profile Ao! UHF 45D-470 MHZ (Low power radio, 1 90,00 90,00 High power radio has Omni directional antenna on site.) FLN2016A 16/4 Mixed VO AC M<Xinle Kit 1 800,00 800,00 MLB-8-AC Surge Protector AC 2in/8out 6 235.00 1,410,00 51020-WM Leviton Surge Protection 1 189,00 189,00 8299-AW GFl W/Switch Leviton (15Amp) 1 39,00 39,00 Thank you for )Our business. TOTAL QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS, SIGNATURE Page 2 16/ A 1 R AG.TRONIX SPECLW!ING III MOTOIlOl.\ IRRIGAnON CONTROL SYsTEMs 1304 N. 15th STREET 1MMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239-657-5519 QUOTA TION/PROPOSAL DATE QUOTE NO, 1ln/200? 833 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOA lMffransportation 2885 Horsesme Drive South Naples, FI. 34104 RECEIVED DEe 1 B 2007 Transportation ATM Dept. TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SLT ITEM DESCRIPTION QlY PRICE TOTAL T-II Single Gang Box 1 0,00 0,00 TSI Technical Services 8 75,00 600,00 Thank: you for )Our business. TOTAL $11,354,00 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS, SIGNATURE Page 3 16/ A "liEf 298 Sobol Polm Fiood cjaples, H 34 i 4 Telephone : 239,732.4624 - fox: 2397320077 Em oil info@ allofoaples,co m December 14. 2007 t~~'rr1Je !'1.'I+,ol Collier County, Transportation Department 2885 Horseshoe Dr. S Naples. Fl 34104 Attn: Darryl Richard We are pleased to submit for your consideration our proposal to provide the following landscape Service at: Radio Rd; Naples, Fl SCOPE OF WORK LandscaDe service: Install 90 Crown of Thorns (red) 1 gallon across from Taylor Rental on Radio Rd 90 Crown of Thorns at $ 12.00 each $ 1, 080.00 Install 90 Bags of Eucalyptus Blend Mulch to plant bed. 90 bags of Mulch at .70 per bag labor only $ 43,00 Total: $ 1143.00 '~ "\ ~' , j : '.\ .,'V' \. ~ (07-051 Radio Rd. Landscape prop. 12-12-07) 161 A 1 2e 25, 2007 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY __ 1)f (7\1 ) WATER AND W ASTE/W A TER AUTHORITY rlala --------- Halas ..L~-----< ,- I~ennlng _ ,---~ Joyle .- - ,V-- ,-:oletta - ---- Naples, Florida, June 25, 2007 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Water and Waste/Water Authority in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 2:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION in Room 610 at the Community Development and Environmental Services Building, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Lowell Lam (Excused) Robert Bennett Dr. Fay Biles (Excused) Jack Markel Jerry Morgan ALSO PRESENT: Jamie French - Executive Director, Operations Mgr, CDES Kenneth Kovensky - Sr. Accountant/Operations, CDES Tom Palmer - Assistant County Attorney Mise, Con<es 10 (A {q Date: Item 11:_ Copies to. / 161 A June 25, 2007 19 I. Call to Order and Roll Call (Determination of Quorum) The rneeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Robert Bennett at 2:08 P,M, A quorurn was established. II. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of March 26, 2007 Mr. Markel moved to approve the minutes of March 26, 2007. Second by Mr. Morgan. Carried unanimously 5-0. III. Items Requiring Action by Authority A. Ave Maria Utility Company, Tariff Sheet Modification for Miscellaneous Services (Page 5 of Packet) An updated Revised Sheet No. 14.0 with the Old Base Facility Charge and new gallonage charge was included in the packet and reviewed. Mr. French asked the Authority to approve the inclusion of the form of thc Tariff sheet for the Company's Wastewater Tariff. Mr. Markel moved to approve the inclusion of the Wastewater Tariff sheet in the Company's Wastewater Tariff. Second by Mr. Morgan. Carried unanimously 3-0. IV. Staff Discussion A. Staff Update - CDES Office of Operations and Regulatory Management Web Site Mr. French updated the Authority on the current changes in personnel. . He answers to Joe Schmitt, . The Website was explained and can now be viewed publicly, The link will be given to the Authority, . Ken Kovensky is the Senior Accountant for Mr. French's department and his back up, B. Upcoming Authority Meetings Staff doesn't favor short agenda's but the rneeting was necessary for the Ave Maria's item, Mr. French did not foresee any case's in the next few months, An updated Organizational Chart was requested and is available to the Authority, V. Open to the Public Kim Retallick - Orange Tree Utilities - answered questions and gave a brief update for the Authority. The following are some of the staternents made: · Has made irnprovements within the Organization . Introduced the Supervisor for Customer Services 2 161 ite 25,109 -,.;.. . Can now make payments with Credit Cards May have a Website in 6 months Discussed AMR's Will have onsite training done in August for higher tech rneters Utility expansion - rnaking progress -waiting for building (SDP has been submitted) Have a total of ],8]0 customers with 22 cornrnercial accounts No longer have the odor problem . . . . . . Mr. French suggested a tour oJOrange Tree Utility along with Ave Maria at the same time, Commissioner Coletta will be invited. VI. Authority Members Discussion - None There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the order of the Vice Chair at 2:20 PM. COLLIER COUNTY W A TERIW ASTEW A TER AUTHORITY to <7;1~ These minutes approved by the Board/Comrnittee on -.fA 8/0 <:) C 8' , as presented /' or as amended . r 3 .." ,- , i)s~, \1 ria a ".--- , Halas Henning Coyle Coletta ;r,' I, """," LJ II A a~CF!\fEr.J' r '0 U b iGU8 8U<ild ,.,r COUI1!'1 (;,j!mn;S~~;(Jn0rs lltuUi.""t 8Mc. M.s.7.1e. A""'sc>,,, Oo".".ltt.. 270!i Horseshoe Drive South Naples, 1'1. :-\4104 January 3, 2008 AGENDA I. Call Meeting to Order II. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes: December 6,2007 V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report - Caroline Soto B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard VI. Landscape Maintenance Report - CLM VII. Old Business VIII. Working Group Update's A. Utilities - Charles Arthur B. Maintenance - Bruce Forman C. Tax Analysis - Bud Martin D. Liaison - Dick Lydon IX. New Business X. Public Comment XI. Adjournment The next meeting is scheduled for 2:00 PM, February 7, 2~~Corres At ST. JOHNS PARISH LIFE CENTER ~ \ 625111TH Ave. Date \.) Naples, FL. f\~ "em#: -J 's to / R~.("'~ (\ .tr=~ i 161 '."f'.' I It"' ~ i~:--'; '({IU8 LI ""'-",..; n ~"~'L'iin:c- ..... ".."."", BMC. M.s.7.1t. November 1, 2007 Advisory eolltlltltt.. ~70S Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Fl, :-14104 ~ IcHi?, ,_H - "-"-." - llalas .' -:./rt-.. Hennlng,:'l I", ,.' ... ',OyI8ZV.> "~ '~o'et1<lMrt'iO'tE"$' I. The meeting was called to order by Dick Lydon at 2:00 P.M. II. Attendance Members: Bud Martin, Carol Wright, lew Schmidt (Excused), Dick lydon, Charles Arthur County: Darryl Richard - MSTU Project Manager, Tessie Sillery - MSTU Operations Coordinator, Caroline Soto - Budget Analyst Others: Jim Fritchey - ClM, Darlene Lafferty - Mancan III. Approval of Agenda Add: VII. A. Approval of Applicant Bud Martin moved to approve the agenda as amended. Second by Charles Arthur. Motion carried unanimously 4--0. IV. Approval of Minutes - October 18, 2007 Charles Arthur moved to approve the Minutes of October 18, 2007. Second by Carol Wright. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report - Caroline Sote distributed and reviewed. (See attached) . Open P.O.s $68,983.30 . Available Operating Expense115,436.54 B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard distributed and reviewed (See attached) reported the Staff has not received a response from FPl on the ROW. Dick Lydon readdressed the installation of the bridge. Stated due to closure of the road widening of the bridge should occur simultane~lt\"" Involvement by the Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association was recommended. 1'," :~enl u:___ __ 1 16 , A20 VI. Landscape Maintenance Report - CLM Dick Lydon commended CLM on the frond removal from the corner of Vanderbilt & Trade Winds. Noted the material was left by Comcast 10 days prior. Dick Lydon requested a letter be sent to Waste Management insisting on a route reversal for trucks to operate from South to North. Noted the current route tramples the landscaping. Darryl Richard confirmed with Mr. Lydon that the problem was the turn radius for the trucks. Dick Lydon responded the existing North to South route damages the landscaping on both sides, Darryl Richard stated he would contact Waste Management. Dick Lydon inquired which plants would replace the dying Ixora, Jim Fritchey responded the Dwarf Fire Bush would be used. Jim Fritchey reported spraying for Thrips & Broadleaf, VII. Old Business A. Approval of Applicant - Dick Lydon noted that Jackie Bammel withdrew her application. Bud Martin moved to correct Pg. 3 V. B. Paragraph 6 should read "Bruce Foreman" of the October 18, 2007 Minutes. Second by Charles Arthur. Motion carried 4-0. Charles Arthur moved to recommend to the BCC that Bruce Foreman be appointed to the Committee. Second by Bud Martin. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. VIII. Working Group Update's A. Utilities - Charles Arthur - None B. Maintenance - Lew Schmidt - None C. Tax Analysis - Bud Martin - None D. Liaison - Dick Lydon - None IX. New Business - None X. Public Comment - None Dick Lydon thanked Carol Wright and Lew Schmidt for the hours spent working with the Committee. Noting they would be greatly missed. XI. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned at 2:40 P.M. 2 16/ Vanderbilt Beach MSTU Advisory Co "ttee Dick Lydon, Chai n /~ /CJ7 , These minutes approved by the Committee on as presented or amended The next is scheduled for 2:00 P.M., December 6,2007 at ST. JOHNS PARISH LIFE CENTER 625111TH Ave. Naples, FL 3 A20 16 I A 20 .... "aM""" B... At.s.7.1e. Advisory 00".".111.. 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL :-14104 November 1, 2007 Summary of Minutes and Motions III. Approval of Agenda Add: VII. A. Approval of Applicant Bud Martin moved to approve the agenda as amended. Second by Charles Arthur. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. IV. Approval of Minutes - October 18,2007 Charles Arthur moved to approve the Minutes of October 18, 2007. Second by Carol Wright. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. VI. Old Business A. Approval of Applicant - Dick Lydon noted that Jackie Bammel withdrew her application, Bud Martin moved to correct Pg. 3 V. B. Paragraph 6 should read "Bruce Foreman" of the October 18,2007 Minutes. Second by Charles Arthur. Motion carried 4-0. Charles Arthur moved to recommend to the BCC that Bruce Foreman be appointed to the Committee. Second by Bud Martin. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. Fiala Halas _0\-___ H ' ,\11' enl1lng_____._ Coyle ~-- c!.-/' oletta _ ----- "11II11.,"" BMe. M.s.7 .IC"'" u'~"uPrv (;"""","suoo,,, 161 A ~C!,::,!VED " 'I \1 ,,?,S C' ). 'J dIU AdviSOry eollllllllt.. ~70!i Horseshoe Dlive SOUdl Naples, FL :-l4104 December 6, 2007 MINUTES I. The meeting was called to order by Dick Lydon at 2:05 P.M. II. Attendance Members: Bud Martin, Dick Lydon, Charles Arthur, Bruce Forman County: Darryl Richard - MSTU Project Manager, Tessie Sillery - MSTU Operations Coordinator (Excused), Caroline Soto - Budget Analyst Others: Darlene Lafferty - Mancan III. Approval of Agenda Add: IX. A. Street Lights Bud Martin moved to approve the agenda as amended. Second by Charles Arthur. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. IV. Approval of Minutes - November 1, 2007 Change: Page 2. Correct spelling should read "Bruce Forman." Charles Arthur moved to approve the Minutes of November 1, 2007 as amended. Second by Bud Martin. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report - Caroline Soto distributed and reviewed. (See attached) . Open P,O.s remaining $65,289.03 . Available Improvements General $3,770,900.00 Charles Arthur reported there was an article stating the Florida Fund was in distress. Noting the Florida Fund was a shared pool & questioned if it would affect the Vanderbilt MSTU's ability to access Funds, Caroline Soto responded that the Vanderbilt MSTU Funds would not be affected. B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard distributed and reviewed (See attached) reported 1 active project - Power Line Underground Installation, Stated the project was set to go before the Board otlate, 1 :~e('r it-. .---.....-...---- 16/ A 20 County Commissioners on November 27, 2007 noting a revision to the ROW Agreement was required. (See Attached) Charles Arthur reported the following: ~ FPl announced a attachment from the original ROW Contract "Exhibit C" - Defined as the drawing for the location of all underground lines within the Vanderbilt MSTU, was not available ~ Payment was requested by FPl to initiate the Engineering Report required to produce "Exhibit C" ~ FPl was advised that payment would not be made until the ROW Agreement was signed ~ After review of the revised ROW Agreement it was discovered a provision was inserted "FPL could terminate the ROW unilaterally if the MSTU did not enter into an underlying construction agreement within 6 months of signing the ROW Agreement" ~ FPl was questioned if the above terms were required & if so the Vanderbilt MSTU required a minimum of 2 years ~ A revision was made to page 3 paragraph 5 Term. to include "However, this agreement may be terminated by FPL upon written notice in the event a separate Underground Facilities Conversion Agreement is not entered into within two Years of the date of this agreement" ~ It was noted Construction must commence within 6 months or forgo deposit monies Charles Arthur moved to approve the agreement as redrafted. Authorize the Chairman Lydon to sign the agreement & authorize payment of the Engineering process. Second by Bud Martin. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. Charles Arthur reported the ROW Agreement was on the December 11, 2007 Agenda for the Board of County Commissioners. Dick Lydon requested notification from County Staff if the ROW Agreement was on the Regular Agenda for the Board of County Commissioners. Discussions ensued. Confirmation for the Work Started Deadline was requested in order to seize the 25% discount. Discussions continued it was determined a timeline from FPl was needed, Dick Lydon reported the entry light sign at Blue Bill is inoperable, VI. Landscape Maintenance Report - CLM The expiration date for the ClM contract was questioned. Dick Lydon noted their absence. He requested the monitoring of side Street bushes that are overgrown. Noting it was a safety issue due to poor visibility. VII. Old Business - None 2 161 A 20 VIII. Working Group Update's A. Utilities - Charles Arthur - Previously discussed V. B, B. Maintenance - Bruce Forman was appointed. C. Tax Analysis - Bud Martin - None D. Liaison - Dick Lydon - Requested Jackie Bammel obtain Board Resolution from the VBRA. Diane Flagg arrived 2:41 pm IX. New Business A. Street Lights Dick Lydon stated the 2 County installed street lights at Moraya Bay Condominium on Gulf Shore Dr. were no longer needed. Relocation of the lights was recommended. Discussion ensued & was determined the lights would be donated to Parks & Recreation. X. Public Comment - None XI. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned at 2:58 P.M. Vanderbilt Beach MSTU Advisory Commi ( /)/ _,?/L/t <- Dick Lydon, Chair These minutes approved by the Committee on I J... I It, I 01 as presented ,/ or amended ~ - The next is scheduled for 2:00 P.M., January 3, 2008 at ST. JOHNS PARISH LIFE CENTER 625111TH Ave. Naples, FL 3 .... 161 III1111f.""t BII*. At.s.7 A. A 20 Ad"lsory eo....ltt.. 270!i Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL a4104 December 6, 2007 Summary of Minutes and Motions III. Approval of Agenda Add: IX. A. Street Lights Bud Martin moved to approve the agenda as amended. Second by Charles Arthur. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. IV. Approval of Minutes - November 1, 2007 Change: Page 2. COlTect spelling should read "Bruce Forman." Charles Arthur moved to approve the Minutes of November 1, 2007 as amended. Second by Bud Martin. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. VI. Transportation Services Report B. Project Managers Report Charles Arthur report the following: ~ A revision was made to page 3 paragraph 5 Term. to include "However, this agreement may be terminated by FPL upon written notice in the event a separate Underground Facilities Conversion Agreement is not entered into within two Years of the date of this agreement" Charles Arthur moved to approve the agreement as redrafted. Authorize the Chairman Lydon to sign the agreement & authorize payment of the Engineering process. Second by Bud Martin. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. 16/ A 20 Thursday, December 06,2007 Prepared by: Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Tessie Sillery, Operations Coordinator, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Vanderbilt MSTU Proiect Status Note; Committee not meeting for June/July/August. (V A-23)- ACTIVE -(POCo Darryl Richard) Ballpark Estimate & Committee Approval 5-3-07: Committee request that Staff call a Special Meeting only if ROW Agreement is received. Committee states that Approval of the Ballpark Estimate will not be considered until County has received ROW Agreement from FPL. Next Meeting is September 6, 2007, 5-16-07: Estimate received from FP&L - $6,680,650,00 - Survey is not included, 5-20-07: FPL confIrms that additional detail will be provided with Engineer's Binding Cost Estimate. 7-19-07 : FP&L Right of Way Agreement from Grover Whidden - County Attorney's reviewing 9-10-07: Committee still waiting on agreement with the pending estimate, 10-18-07: Committee has provided necessary Approval for Engineering deposit in the amount of $56,712,00, Engineering Deposit fee will be included in Executive Summary to BCC on 11127/07, (V A-18) - ACTIVE-ONGOING (Pac: Tcssie Sillery)- Maintenance Contract - Contract #05-3687 "Vanderbilt Beach BeautifIcation MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance"; Current Renewal Period expires December 13,2006, PO#4500052464; dated 10/06/2005; Commercial Land Maintenance (Vendor 100671); Notice of Award sent December IS, 2004; First Contract Period 12/14/04 to 12/13105; Second Contract Period 12/13105 to 12/13/06; Note: 2 additional renewal periods remain. (Maximum extension tbis contract is to 12/13/08) (V A-IS) - ACTIVE -- (Pac: Darryl Richard) -Power Line Underground Installation FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT: $6,151,000,00 PROJECT SCHEDULE: Vandl/rbilt MSTU: ROW Ag"",,,,,,nt Phu.. FPL Po_r111l4l. UnCll/rground Installation PHASE Start . End Date 4/2.312007-5/112007 (2 week FPL ComlTlitlTlent) 111712007 111712007 (actual) 12/11/2007 A~ Bee Approval & committee approval 12/1112007-6127/2008 612712008 12/281200& 7/27/2007 7/27/20(j7.1124/09 1124/2.009 I Legal Review Finalized ROW Agreement Final Document Bce APPR Pay~ to FPL 66 k FPl binding Cl)St "simate El mo. FPL Binding CO$t estimate Due 180 day (project must atart by date) NTP FPL PrQjact construellon 1 SO day constructlon Projact Complete Project Preliminary Research Phase; Construction Cost: $6,151,000,00; 1 161 A20 Preliminary Phase; FPL Request Further Breakdown of Project into 1/2 of Gulf Shore Drive for project cost to come in at approximately 3,5 million, MSTU Committee Sub-Committee Chair for FPL (Charles Arthur) to set up meeting with Commissioner conceming his request for a meeting with Committee representative, FPL representative (Grover Whitten), and representative from Homeowner's Association (member TBO), Subcommittee Chair Charles Author was to meet with Commissioner Frank Halas regarding this request and report to Staff. Tom Kuck, of Collier County, Engineering Services Department, Engineering Services Director is new contact as per Charles Arthor, Currently the Project is not moving forward due to budget constraints, unresolved procedural issues (lack of documentation from FPL i,e. Right of Way Agreement for the purposes of relocation of existing utilities and future relocation of existing and installed utilities as a result of the project. During the 1-6-06 MSTU Budget meeting the option ofa 'Revenue Bond' was mentioned by Mike Isackson he said that this would have to be confmned, FPL is to provide the requested document for agreement between FPL and Collier County, 4-17-06 -ACTIVE - FP&L to provide agreement for right of way - pending 5-1-06 - Need Documents from FPL in order to proceed with project. 5-15-06- Charles reported that FP&L would have it in a few weeks and will report to proj, mgr, 5-24-06-Call Jamie French to follow-up on status of FPL reI. to County Activities 5-30-06 - Jamie French reports Grover Widden is waiting for public service commission to approve agreement with collier county and 25% matching funding, 6-12-06 - Contacted Jamie French to obtain exact meeting times/dates which the Public Service Commission will be considering the 25% FPL cost sharing proposal and the Vanderbilt Beach FPL Powerline Burial Project. 6-27-06 Contacted Jamie French to obtain exact meeting times/dates which the Public Service Commission will be considering the 25% FPL cost sharing proposal and the Vanderbilt Beach FPL Powerline Burial Project. 7- 18-06 ; Review by public service commission - pending on approval ofBCC Vanderbilt Ordinance- Amendment. 8-7-06: BCC approval on 7/25/06 for ordinance revision to include burial of power lines, 8-22-06: Jamie French confmns meeting with Grover Whiten (Andy Whitely-alternate) and CDES staff on August 24, 2006 to review 'Hardening' program, Currently the Public Service Commission has not approved the 25% matching program by FPL (pending), Additionally, Kate Donifrio, FPL reports that they have yet to receive the fmal copy of the' agreement' for ROW utilization for the project from the FPL attorney office, 8-24-06: Jamie French, CDES, Diane Flagg, A TM Director, and Tadd Pluck, TECM Engineer attend CDES/FPL Meeting of August 24, 2006. Still under review Oct-Nov Public Service Commission will review to approve FPL proposal of 25% Cost Sharing and Right of Way Agreement and Depreciation value is under review. Funding for private individuals cannot be publicly funded (question), Switch Boxes above base flood elevation (question), 8-31-06: Jamie French communicates that Tadd Pluck has the Right of Way Agreement that Grover has been referencing to in previous conversation. 9-14-06: Jamie French reports that the County Attorney is reviewing the proposed ROW agreement. And that the Fleriela 8tate Legislature and Public Service Commission has to approve the 25% proposal from FPL. After these approvals the MSTU Committee needs to consider plan to fmance the proposal which is about 6 million (2006 FPL quote), 12-19-06: Copy of ROW Agreement forwarded to County Attorney Scott Teach for review. 1-3-07: Copy sent to Thomas Palmer County Attorney 1-10-7: County Attomey - FP&L agreement under review 1-17-07: Meeting to be set up with Charles / Grover Whidden lDanyl/ Diane - regarding agreement 1-24-07: Meeting was cancelled due to Charles being out of town and other information needs to be distributed, 2-28-07: Requested state statute # - Florida Statutes, ~ 337.403(1), 3-23-07: Request for Drawings from Vanderbilt Sidewalk Project to Trinity Scott 3-26-07: Review of Survey Data with Paul Masters and Ray Magsumbol 3-29-07: Meeting has been scheduled in the BCC Conference room - Date: April 12, 2007 - at 2:00pm - attendees - County Mgr/ Commissioner Halas/ Charles Arthur, Kathryn Donofrio and FPL members, The meeting agenda includes :Review of the fmal draft of the ROW agreement Engineering Design and Construction timeline , 2 161 ~o 4-12-07: Meeting at BCC office, FPL will work on Agreement with County Legal. Final Version of agreement requires BCC approval. Submittal ofrevised project quote request pending Committee review/approval. Coordination with FPL Working Group Leader Charles Arthur on revised quote request in preparation of Committee approval. 4-23-07: Scott Teach sends documentation for agreement to Grover Whidden, FPL response pending due by April 26, 2007 as per commitment in meeting 4/12/07, 4-24-07: Request for re-quote of ballpark estimate sent. Revised estimate due by May 15, 2007 from FPL. 5-16-07: Estimate received from FP&L - $ 6,680,650,00 - Survey is not included, 5-25-07: Grover Whidden indicates that agreement would be produced by June 15,2007, 6-15-07: Agreement has not been received from FPL. 6-19-07: Phone conversation with John Lehr, FPL confIrms that the MSTU would have to provide a survey of the project roadways, John Lehr will forward a sample drawing for use in obtaining scope of services from surveyors, John confIrms that the 25% GAF will be assessed in the CIAC Estimate, John confIrms in order to qualify for GAF 25% project is required to have 3 pole miles, and homeowner hook-up is to be completed within 6 months of last major power supply connection. Project may be phased for a total of 3 pole miles, however, time in between projects (phases) cannot exceed one year from end construction to begin construction, 7-19-07: (Grover Widden) FP&L Agreement emailed to County and County Attorney's reviewing agreement 9-4-07: Request sent to Scott Teach to obtain fmalized agreement. 10-8-07: FPL and County Legal reviewing a fmal version of agreement. 10-11-07: County Attorney - Teach sent fmal version of agreement to County Staff, 10-16-07: Right of Way agreement was emailed to Committee members. 10-18-07: ROW Agreement presented to Committee; Vanderbilt MSTU Committee approved ROW Agreement as submitted. ROW Agreement will be forwarded to FPL for approval prior to going to BCC on Nov, 27,2007. I H-07: Response from FPL is still pending. Deadline for BCC 11/27/07 is 11/08/07, 11-7-07: FP&L Agreement email to us by Scott Teach, 12-6-07: Revised agreement submitted for approval by Committee prior to 12-11-07 BCC Date, (V A-22)- COMPLETE -{POCo Darryl Richard) Parks & Recreation Signs 1-3-07: Murdo - parks & rec. - addressed committee on design 1-29-07: Murdo will report to Committee at 2-1-07 regular meeting, 2-1-07: Murdo reported with approx, estimate - committee agreed to spend up to $12,000,00 2-21-07: PO sent to Murdo for $15,500 of which Parks & Rec will be IGC'ed at time of invoice $4,000,00 4-5-07: Got the following update from Murdo Smith - Permit has been issued and the sign is being constructed, Murdo will meet up at the site with Lykins to get the proper placement of the sign, 4-26-07: Murdo Smith indicates that sign location will be further from intersection. 5-2-07: Scan of 'sign location map' sent to Lykins Signteck and Collier Parks & Recreation to confIrm sign location for Landscape Maintenance Working Group, 7-20-07: ConfIrmed with Murdo Smith - Sign footings have been installed - concrete base 8-12-07: Sign installation is completed with sign logo(s). (V A-17) - COMPLETE -Conversion to Motorola Irrigation Controller, 9-14-06: Committee votes for staff to proceed with conversion to Motorola Controller. 9-22-06: Site inspection and coordination with existing project drawings. 10-3-06: VerifIcation of specifIcation for Motorola irrinet controller with Irrigation Project Manager Roger Dick. Request for Quote from E.B, Simmonds is due by Oct, 20, 2006, E.B. Simmonds to provide all electrical components, 10-18-06: E.B, Simmonds quotes complete project at $22,790,00; requires Committee Approval in order to proceed, 11-2-06: Committee votes not to proceed with Motorolla Irrigation Controller Conversion, 11-2-06: Project cancelled, 3 16/ A 20 V A-19) ~ COMPLETE-SDP PLAN REQUEST-Request for SDP Plan for Developments within MSTU Boundary - As per MSTU Committee discussion on 10/5/2006. 11-17-06: No Plans on record as being submitted for review in Transportation per John Podczerwinsky. Plans once received will be forwarded to MSTU Liason Staff for review. (V A-16) - COMPLETE -eLM Outstanding Maintenance Items Added on September 14, 2006: l. Replace 2 valve boxes (and/or covers) at Pine and Vanderbilt Drive. 2. Cut the tops of the ficus hedges as per Working Group direction during previous walkthroughs.Replace 3. any dead and or dying bougainvillea and trim all bougainvilleas to eliminate all leaders. (Comments regarding "north of Tradewinds' bougainvillea - inspect for replacements and/or pruning) 10-5-06: Item #2 and #3 completed. 10-26-06: Item #3 Completed; all valve covers are in place. (V A-21) ~ COMPLETE -Request for Staff assistance with vehicles parking on irrigation heads and valves along Vanderbilt Drive. 10-20-06: Margie Hapke, Public Infonnation Coordinator, Public Utilities/ Admin; contacted regarding Committee request. 10-23-06: Margie Hapke sends notification to all field crews to avoid parking on grass and in particular sprinkler heads and landscaping within Vanderbilt MSTU Boundary. (V A-20) ~ COMPLETE -Request for FPL to trim trees from around power lines. 10-05-06: Committee request to have staff contact FPL to have them trim powerlines within the MSTU Boundary . 10-20-06: Becki Daniels, FPL, Vegitation Management, Senior Utility Arborist West Region contacted regarding Committee request. 10-26-06: Becki Daniels has deligated inspection and corrective action with 'Mike' ofFPL field arborist maintenance crew. Trees are to be inspected and pruned as per standard FPL practices. (V-14) COMPLETE -Bench Replacement QUOTE RECEIVED FROM ANNUAL CONTRACTOR V ARrAN CONSTRUCTION FOR $16,104.00 ($10,229.00 Installation; $5,875.00 Materials) February 10, 2006. 3-06-06 - CLM to provide quote as per committee request. 4-6-06 - CLM quote for $3,057.20 Approved by Committee April 6, 2006. 4-12-06 - Bench Order PO Sent to Contract Connections - Order will be shipped to CLM. 5-1-06 - Product order is pending, CLM is ready to install. 5-15-06 - No change in status waiting on material. 5-30-06 - Mark Adams reports bench order will arrive within two weeks and are being shipped to CLM. 6-12-06 - Still waiting for delivery. 6-21-06; Check w / Mark Adams on status 6-27-06; Order will be delivered in two weeks - Per Mark Adams 7-12-06; Order was to be shipped outjuly 11th - in transitto commercialland maint. 8-14-06: Order received by CLM and will be installed beginning August 23, 2006. Installation is to be complete by September 1, 2006. 9-14-06: Installation Complete By Commercial Land. (V- 1) - COMPLETE- PROJECT-REVISION TO VANDERBILT MSTU ORDINANCE 5-25-06-Scott Teach contacted regarding revision. 5-30-06 - Scott Teach is workiog on revising ordinance. 6-12-06 - Darryl emailed the revised ordinance to scott for approval & Dick Lydon. 6-27-06: Revising original draft coordinates and adding fiscal. 7-18-06 - BCC to approve Amended Ordinance 2006-7-25-06 4 161 ~ 20 7-25-06: BCC Approves Ordinance Revision. 8-22-06: Revision to ordinance is complete (V-2) COMPLETE-Report on Interest Rate for MSTU. Derrick Johnson reported the interest earnings for the Vanderbilt MSTU Committee. The Committee requested that Derrick provide an annual tabulation of the interest earnings since the creation of the MSTU in 2001. 3-20-06 - Tessie has request meeting with Derrick Johnson. 4-17-06 - Derrick Johnson to attend next MSTU 5-1-06 - Derrick Johnson to provide 5 year report on interest earned. 5-1506 - Derrick Johnson provided and committee satisfied with report. 5-15-06 - Committee requested an additional report with mstu report. 5-30-06 - Complete: Derek reported at mstu meeting. May 4th. (V-3) PROJECT CANCELLED-Effluent Connection - Project Preliminary Research Phase; Construction Cost: $900,000.00; Design Cost: $170,000.00; (V-4) COMPLETE-Bluebill and Baker Carroll Point Planting Project - Project Complete July 1,2005; $ll ,006.00 Project Complete (V-5) -COMPLETE - Bluebill and Gulf-Shore Drive -Project Complete August 30,2005: Construction: $2,571.00; (V-6) -PROJECT CANCELLED-Plantings Bayview @ Gulfshore Drive - Cancelled 8/16/05; Construction Cost: $1,590 (V-7) PROJECT CANCELLED -Channel Drive@GulfshoreDrive-Cancelled8/16/05;Construction Cost $1,590 Project Scope to possibly include irrigation. (V-8) - PROJECT CANCELLED - Street Sign Project-Pending Vanderbilt HOA Approval: Construction: $15,390.00 Requires HOA Approval. Project is not approved by HOA (10-18-05 report from Lew Schmidt). (V-9) - PROJECT CANCELLED-Plantings III th at Vanderbilt Drive Plantings. (V-IO) - COMPLETE- Sod Refurbishment Project - Project 50% Complete; Construction & Materials Cost: West Area ($3,999.20); East Area ($3,999.85). Project 100% Complete on 10/1/05 (V-10) -NON-MSTU PROJECT-Gulf Shore Drive Sidewalk Project-Pathways-Non-MSTU Project; Trinity Scott to report on the status of this project. Trinity Scott to report Status. Change Order to project is being processed. (V -II) -NON-MSTU PROJECT-Sidewalk Project-East Side of Vanderbilt Drive (Vanderbilt Beach Road to Illth Avenue- Non-MSTU Project; Pathways Project; Trinity Scott to report on the status of this project. Trinity Scott to report Status (V-l2) - COMPLETE, Vanderbilt Drive - Plant Material Replacement Project. Need to review plant locations with Commercial Land Maintenance prior to installation. Schedule at next sub-committee meeting. Meeting to be scheduled after Lew Schmidt's meeting with HOA on 1/9/06. (V-l3) - COMPLETE-BACKFLOW PREVENTION-REPLACEMENT; Backflow preventor failed to operate. Reported on 3/22/06 and repaired on 3/28/06. 5 16, A 20 COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND CONVERSIONS THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this _ day of , 2007 by and between the VanderbiJt Beach Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit, by and through its governing body, the Board of eommissioners for eollier eounty, Florida (hereafter, "VanderbiJt MSTU"), the Board of eommissioners for eollier eounty, Florida (hereafter, "Local Government") whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiarni Trail, East, Naples, Florida 34112 and Florida Power & Light eompany ("FPL"), a Florida corporation with an address of P.O. Box 14000, 700 Universe Boulevard, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0429. WHEREAS, Local Government may request that FPL convert certain overhead electric distribution facilities located within and specifically limited to the following boundaries within the VanderbiJt MSTU (the "eonversion"): Ail of that property lying westerly of the centerline of VanderbiJt Drive from VanderbiJt Beach Road north to the centerline of the Little Horse Pass Bridge (eollier eounty Bridge No. 030177); thence, westerly along the meander line of the eocohatchee River until it meets the Gulf of Mexico. Said lands being more fully depicted on the drawing attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (collectively, the "Existing Overhead Facilities") to underground facilities, including transformers, switch cabinets and other appurtenant facilities some of which may be installed above ground (collectively, the "Underground Facilities") and has further requested that certain of the Underground Facilities be placed in certain of its road rights-of-way ("Local Government ROW'') and/or certain road rights-of-way owned by or under the jurisdiction of other agencies ("Other ROW''). Local Government ROW and Other ROW may be referred to collectively as "ROW"; and WHEREAS, the Vanderbilt MSTU is considering paying FPL the cost of such eonversion as required by FPL' s electric tariff and Section 25-6.115 of the Florida Administrative eode and is also considering entering into a separate Underground Facilities eonversion Agreement with FPL; and WHEREAS, FPL is willing, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, FPL's electric tariff and Section 25-6.115 of the Florida Administrative eode, to place certain of the Underground Facilities in the ROW, conditioned upon the Vanderbilt MSTU entering into a separate Underground Facilities eonversion Agreement and agreeing to pay the cost of such eonversion as required by FPL' s electric tariff and Section 25-6.1 15 of the Florida Administrative eode. NOW THEREFORE, in recognition of the foregoing premises and the covenants and agreements set forth herein, and other consideration the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties covenant and agree as follows: I. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement. Page 1 of8 161 A 20 2. Conditions Precedent to Placement of Underground Facilities in ROW (a) Local Government covenants, represents and warrants that: (i) Local Government has full legal right and authority to enter into this Agreement; (ii) Local Government has full legal right and authority to take all actions and measures necessary to fulfill Local Government's obligations under this Agreement; (iii) Local Government hereby authorizes the use of the ROW by FPL for the purposes stated herein. (b) All applicable permits for FPL to install, construct, or maintain Underground Facilities in ROW must be issued on a timely basis by the appropriate agency. (c) The design and location of the Underground Facilities to which Local Government has agreed are in compliance with all operational and safety guidelines, codes and standards, (d) Local Government agrees to provide within ninety (90) days from the date of this Agreement, at its expense, a legal description that is acceptable to FPL of the ROW to be occupied by the Underground Facilities at a time before FPL initiates the design of the Underground Facilities. Said legal description shall be made part of this Agreement and attached as Exhibit "B." (e) Within a reasonable period of time after receipt of Exhibit B from Local Government not to exceed one hundred and twenty (120) days"FPL agrees to identify and document all existing FPL underground facilities within the ROW that will not be included under this Agreement. Local Government shall reimburse FPL' s reasonable costs and expenses to deliver said documentation. Said documentation shall be made part of this Agreement and attached as Exhibit "e." (f) The parties agree that the construction drawings when prepared shall be attached as Exhibit "D" to this Agreement and that the construction drawings may be amended to reflect changes to location of the facilities as required. 3. Relocation and Rearrangement of FPL Facilities. If the Local Government or other agency with control over the Local Government ROW or Other ROW, for any reason whatsoever, requires that FPL relocate or rearrange, in whole or in part, any Underground Facilities (as they are to exist as a result of this eonversion, or as they may later be modified, upgraded, or otherwise altered) from or within the Local Government ROW or Other ROW, the Local Government, notwithstanding any language to the contrary in any applicable permit or franchise agreement, and prior to any such relocation by FPL, shall provide FPL with a substitute location, satisfactory to FPL, obtain any easements that may be necessary, and shall pay FPL for the costs of any such relocation, adjustment or rearrangement, now or in the future. Local Government shall reimburse FPL for all costs to locate, expose, protect or support the Underground Facilities, whether underground or above ground, in the event of future construction or excavation in close proximity to the Underground Facilities, when such services are required by Local Government or other agency with control over the Local Government ROW or Other ROW Local Government shall use its best efforts in any design and Page 2 of8 16/ A 20 construction of its future road improvement projects to avoid or mitigate the necessity of relocating or adjusting the Underground Facilities in Local Government ROWand, to the extent reasonably practicable, in Other ROW. 4. Abandonment or Sale of Local Government ROW. If the Local Government desires to subsequently abandon or discontinue use of the Local Government ROW, and ownership of the land is transferred to a private party, the Local Government, as a condition of and prior to any such sale, abandonment, or vacation, shall grant FPL an easement satisfactory to FPL for the Underground Facilities then existing within the ROW or require the transferee to so grant FPL an easement satisfactory to FPL at the time of transfer. If ownership of the Local Government ROW is transferred to another public entity, that public entity shall take the ROW subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 5. Term. This Agreement shall remain in effect for as long as FPL or any successor or assign owns or operates the Underground Facilities placed in the ROW. However, this Agreement may be terminated by FPL upon written notice in the event a separate Underground Facilities eonversion Agreement is not entered into within two years of the date of this Agreement. 6. Title and Ownership of Underground Facilities. Title and ownership of Underground Facilities installed by FPL as a result of this Agreement shall, at all times, remain the property ofFPL. 7. Conversion Outside ROW. In the event that the FPL Underground Facilities are not, for any reason other than the sole error of FPL or its contractors, constructed within the ROW, Local Government shall grant or secure, at Local Government's sole cost and expense, new easements or ROW grants for the benefit of FPL for the placement of the Underground Facilities in these areas, and shall secure subordinations of any mortgages affecting these tracts to the interest of FPL. 8. Agreement Subject to FPL's Electric Tariff. This Agreement is subject to FPL' s electric tariff, including but not limited to the general rules and regulations for electric service and the rules of the Florida Public Service eommission, as may be revised, amended or supplemented from time to time. 9. Venue; Waiver of Jury Trial. This Agreement shall be enforceable in eollier eounty, Florida, and if legal action is necessary by either party with respect to the enforcement of any or all of the terms or conditions herein, exclusive venue for the enforcement of same shall lie in eollier eounty, Florida. By entering into this Agreement, FPL and the Local Government expressly waive any 'rights either party may have to a trial by jury of any civil litigation related to or arising out of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. 10. Attorney Fees. In the event it becomes necessary for either party to institute or defend legal proceedings as a result of the failure of the other party to comply Page3of8 161 A 2r with the terms, covenants, or provisions of this Agreement, each party in such litigation shall bear its own cost and expenses incurred and extended in connection therewith, including, but not limited to attorneys' fees and court costs through all trial and appellate levels. I I. Assignment. The Local Government shall not assign this Agreement without the written consent of FPL 12. Recording. This Agreement shall be adopted by the Local Government and maintained in the official records of Local Government for the duration of the term of this Agreement. This Agreement also shall be recorded in the Official Records of the eounty in which the Underground Facilities are located, in the place and in the manner in which deeds are typically recorded. 13. Conflict Between Terms of Permit or Franchise Agreement. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any permit or franchise agreement entered into by Local Government and FPL, the terms of this Agreement shall control. 14. Notice. Any notice, instruction or other communication to be given to either party hereunder shall be in writing and shall be hand delivered, te1ecopied, sent by Federal Express or a comparable overnight service or by U. S. registered or certified mail, with return receipt requested. and postage prepaid to each party at their respective addresses set forth below: As to Local Government and Vanderbilt MSTU: With copies to: As to FPL: Page 4 of8 Page 50f8 16 f A 20 16 5 ~ 20 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Florida Power & Light eompany, Vanderbilt MSTU and the Local Government have executed this Agreement on the date ftrst set forth above. For and on behalf of the VANDERBILT MSTU Advisory Committee, through its Chairperson, By: (signature) Name: and By and through COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA as the LOCAL GOVERNMENT and in its capacity as the governing body of the VANDERBILT MSTU: By: (signature) Name: JAMES N. eOLETTA Title: eHAIRMAN, BOARD OF eOMMISSIONERS OF eOLLIER FLORIDA eOUNTY eOUNTY, ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROeK, elerk By: Deputy elerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Scott R. Teach, Managing Assistant eounty Attorney Page 6 of8 16/ A For FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY By: (signature) Name: (print or type) Title: (print or type) Page 7 of8 20 16' ~ 20 "'U4f :J l- e/) :EM 1-"'" ...J.... -0 a1z a::J ~u.. Z < > 0 to ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :5 0 0 0 8 ;3j co N 0 8f:: 0 ... '" 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" .... 0 0 ..; N ci 0 <Xi 0 0 0 0 ..; 0 ~ g ~ .... <Xi .,; 0 ~I 0 N co .... 0 '" 0 0 0 0 ... 0 18~ 0 0 '" .... N .... to "'- a 0 '" '" N m m <0 to .,; ci ~ .,; ci .,; ci ci .,.: ~ .,; .... M ci ga ~ N ~ .... .... N N ~ N '" ~ .... .... M M ... o "- " (5 E 2 0.. ii'O .a oii uo.. <( acoLOO I'- en 0 C\I ommco NmmL[) C\tO_N --..,... ~ 0Cl CDLOlO"" -q-NN"" r---:cx:iM"': T'""MLOCO ""'''D ci - ~t1}f/t(;R-mEA-(Il-EA-EA-_ E rng <( := 0 gs~~ ;:::: " o ~ >-C!: LL '-T il) .q- C, ,--) (D l.D 0 ~5;~ ~ 8 ,i) ("-J N l;) '''' , ;..l" \.1) ,., t_ 0 ,~~\ ~ ~ '-1"]) C'-.l Co! ('".j \() '" C" U)(f)<'/)u-)-mU)U-7UjU)~ "- ., (I) ..... C> C> N cD .. CI) .c E CI) u CI) o Q) ~.~ c U! ~ .~ t1J co a (I)'"::;:::;: n:E ::;:~~ CD C)Ol!Su~~ i~:EID5~~.c: Co c: - .- .- 0 'C nJ e a. a.. s a o..~"UlUl::;: CDW-;'COOO:J ~ ~~~~.~~ zOO'o 'i:: 'L: a::: ,,-o(J:V-='-~ c: ~(I)Q)E~~1ii ~ c '0 == E oc ;:: ~ ....J C CD CD 0 0 O..Q 0 a.. to >UUUiLLLU-U-::;: ., o 5.J 0<( "'l- ea o..l- :>,]i '13 m :u 'C Gi ~ Out .!!! OJ Q) WUlU- ~ ~ 'l"""...........m Q)co......1.ll lD ~S;:!N :is-MOlO .!!J!Oai~cD "Iii (0 1.0 ~....~ ~ co co to 0 '" co 0 ... .... co ... N '" 0 0 .... N ~ N ... ...- to N. N ~ cD ~ 16 'f A 20 ~~~~~~~~~~EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-mEA-EA-EA-EA-. ;::::- m ..; '" 0Cl ci :::. rnmr:::-M'mooG'N' !'"'":c.c:NtOCO..-CO "ii.a~S;:2ci.~~~ :::s:cN_O_v ......'1"""(0 !jc~So ri~ai ......CDN ..- en-- a..- '-" ('II )( ~ W~~EA-mEA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-_EA-EA-EA-mEA-EA-EA-mEA-EA-EA-EA- "''''.... NN'" aic-i"': "''''co ",,,,co c:i - <ONCO tOtON N"':'" "'tOm OClCO<O ~ari......- ~ .. ~ II c: .. S 'E ~ E o OEA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-*WEA-EA-EA-EA-mmEA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-WEA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-_ N to '" 0 0 '" '" M ~ ... m 0 0 .... .... C> .,; ... 0 0 0 ~ * '" N '" 0 0 0 to "' '" to N 0 '" ... N ci .,.; M ci N N .,i. N N '" 8 8888 ~ gggl t ~~~I :s. ~ri. <tt/i ER-~~tA~ER-ER-tR-fA-ut" ~ Cnt-~a:x~a: wU~a.<(<.9t- I- a::~~<(t- z ::;: w-,u::;:::;:oo III ~<(iz81i100~u(ij::l ggj~~tiiff:ff:~~~i <(t-wt-wOCOCoOCoo >cn::2I--..UJWu..WUJ OWI-(I).-rlLu.. LL . <( a:: en W Z en (f) ~ en ';!!. ""'.: o::wwffi~ZZo::ZIO:!;: ::::It->t-wCiiCii<(Cii@D O~~~O::I-I-Ol-zF 6' o ~_o ~CDg i 'C ~ E :::I '" <(me 6' o o o o ,..: to ~ 00 00 do 00 OtO N ~ 00000 00000 aaaoo 00000 oaa~a_1O ..oLriaa ~~N 00 00 cia 00 0'" ciari to 000 000 acio 000 00'" N'M N'" ER-fA-fA-ER-EA-ER-ER-fI)fI)fI)fhU) cc~;;t ......~~US <CZ ~~:> lJjOC::;:O ii:iii ffioc8~ ~d!~~ ~:s I~~O:: ~~>-w ~o tiowt->-owOOU wZ 00..21- a::Z a..<C OOt-<(oQzuw<( <(<.9 wuuuoc<(;;;;;-'z uz wwcnc::::I-a::......~wJ:cn- ~~~~frl~~~~~~~ Z 0 <l' t- -' <( 00 a. ;;: :> <l' oca. w~..JOW~~Ul::;:::;:..J 8g8888g888888~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~.i Mri~ ~~ N ~ ~-~c:; gg.!!, ..... I"'- ,.... ,is riri it EA-fR-ER-fhER-ER-EA-ER-ER-ER-ER-ER-ER-tIt o Wz 8 ocO ~ ~~ ~w ~ 0..0 a:: Ui:'5::;:W<.9>-Z !ic~tii<( i=...Jwa..cn<['::J cncnzU ... ocw5t.5iz~~ zzooc 8 wu w ::oo<(<(Uo >00"'<.9::;::> ocOCOCoc"-oo o~oc~wOOwt-t-www::l <( WI->...Jt-u.I-I-u..>>rD -,ocI<(o<(ooUlWWooOCOC-, <(WI-cta::t:zz<::><::>zww-c <.9IOCWa.a.CiiCiiooCiiOOOO"" ~b~~;;51-1-~ffil-~~g ~NM~~~,....~m~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~gM~~~~~~ 16'1 B 1 January 4,2008 -. I I' JL--h../ 1)f' rlaa ~___ . , HalaS_~~--._.. Hennlng._~ Coyle _. -_.__ Coletta. _..~._ MINUTES OF THE HEARING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY SPECIAL MAGISTRATE Naples, Florida, January 4, 2008 RECEIVED JAN 1 8 2008 ROd!d of (;ounty Con>mlssioners LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Special Magistrate, in and for the County of Collier having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 AM in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F," 3rd floor, of the Government Complex, Naples, Florida, and the following persons were present: SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: Honorable Brenda Garretson Sue Chapin, Secretary to the Special Magistrate STAFF PRESENT: Gary Dantini, Code Enforcement Supervisor Carol Sykora, Code Enforcement Supervisor Bendisa Marku, Code Enforcement Operations Coordinator Misc. Corres I G (B I Date: Item#: ;::o,ie.s to: ~ 1 6 I ... e. tI!If luary 4, 2008 I. CALL TO ORDER The Meeting was called to order by the Honorable Special Magistrate Brenda Garretson at 9:00 AM. All those testifying at the proceeding did so under oath. A. Hearing Rules and Regulations were given by Special Magistrate Garretson. Special Magistrate Garretson noted that, prior to conducting the Hearing, the Respondents were given an opportunity to speak with their Investigating Officer for a Resolution by Stipulation; looking for compliance without being punitive. RECESS: 9:12 AM RECONVENED: 9:30 AM II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Bendisa Marku, Code Enforcement Operations Coordinator, proposed the following changes: (a) Under Item VI(A.), "Motion for Imposition of Fines," Case # 2007030266 - BCC vs. Ricardo Montpelier Acosta, and Case # 2007030265 - BCC vs. Ricardo Montpelier Acosta were withdrawn by the County due to foreclosure. The Special Magistrate approved the Agenda as amended, subject to changes made during the course of the Hearing at the discretion of the Special Magistrate. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Minutes of the Hearing held on December 7, 2007 were reviewed by the Special Magistrate and approved as submitted. IV. MOTIONS A. Motions for Continuance: (under "Motion for Imposition of Fines") 5. Case # 2006100283 - Georl!e G. Smith Jr. Tr.. Anita U. Smith Tr.. Smith Trust UTD 05/09/07 The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was not present. Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Heinz Box was present. Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Secs. 6, 7 & 8 Accumulation of litter Violation address: 1120 St. Clair Shores Rd. The Special Magistrate noted the Respondent had submitted a written Request for a Continuance which stated he would be out of town at the time of the Hearing. The Investigator stated the eounty would not oppose the granting of a eontinuance. The Special Magistrate APPROVED the Respondent's Request for a Continuance. 2 161 B Janlary 4, 2008 (under "Hearings") 16. Case # 2007070244 - BCC vs. Mary Edwards The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was not present. Collier County eo de Enforcement Investigator Azure Sorrels was present Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sees. 1O.02.06(B)(1)(A), 1O.02.06(B)(I)(E) and 10.02.06(B)(1)(E)(I) Building permits Violation Address: 47 Moon Bay St. The Special Magistrate noted the Respondent had submitted a written Request for a Continuance on December 17, 2007 due to hospitalization and medical treatment. The Investigator stated the County would not oppose the granting of a Continuance. The Special Magistrate APPROVED the Respondent's Requestfor a Continuance. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Stipulations: 7. Case # 2007040354 - BCC vs. Desi!!ners' Collectables LLC, Kevin G. Coleman, RIA The Hearing was requested eollier County Code Enforcement Investigator Stephen Athey who was present. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 10.02.06(B)(I)(A), 10.02.06(B)(1)(E) & 1O.02.06(B)(I)(E)(I); Collier County Land Development Code, Section 22, Article II, Subsections 104.1.3.5; Florida Building Code 2004 Edition, Sees. 105.1 & 105.7 Building permits Violation address: 792 I loth Ave. N. A Stipulation had been agreed to by Evelyn Waldron as owner and manager of Designers' Collectables, LLC, on November 14, 2007. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to obtain all required permits and a Certificate of Completion on or before March 4, 2008, or afine of $1 00. 00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent paid the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $235. 83. The Respondent is to notify the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the violation(s) had been abated. 3 -.---,-.......". ,,~-. ,-~-,.,._--,_.,..,,''''''....._.._-----'''-~.,._-_.~'_.,~'_......-..,',. 16~ B Janu14, 2008 5. Case # 2006120105 - BCC vs. Albert Rex and VIla M. Rex The Hearing was requested Collier eounty Code Enforcement Investigator Christopher Ambach who was present. The Respondents were not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 1O.02.06(B)(I)(A), 1O.02.06(B)(I)(D) & 1O.02.06(B)(1 )(D)(I); Collier County Land Development eode, Section 22, Article II, Subsections 104.1.3.5 & 106.1.2; Florida Building Code 2004 Edition, Sees. 105.1 & 105.7 Building permits Violation address: 40 Island Lake Lane A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondent. Albert Rex, on January 2, 2008, on behalf of his wife, Ulla M Rex, and himself The Investigator stated the violation had been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondents were found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and were ordered to pay Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $288. 61 on or before January 18, 2008. 15. Case # 2007090235 - BCC vs. Mark W. Markisen & Estella Markisen The Hearing was requested by eollier County Code Enforcement Investigator Azure Sorrels who was present. The Respondent, Mark W. Markisen, was present and also represented his wife, Estella Markisen. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 1O.02.06(B)(I)(A), 1O.02.06(B)(I)(E) & 1O.02.06(B)(I)(E)(I); Florida Building Code 2004 Edition, Sec. 105.1 Building permits Violation address: III San Salvador St. A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondent, Mark w: Markisen, on behalf of his wife, Estella Markisen, and himself The Investigator stated the violation had been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondents were found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and were ordered to pay Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $224. 81 on or before February 4, 2008. 4 1(r1 8 Jlary 4, 2008 1. Case # 2007080054 - BCC vs. Jose Luis Jaimes & Martina Jaimes The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Carol Sykora who was present. The Respondents were also present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 7 Rental registration Violation address: 588 Hope Cir. A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondent. The Investigator stated the violation had not been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondents were found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and were ordered to obtain a Collier County Rental Registration on or before January 11, 2008, or afine of $25. 00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondents were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $231. 50 on or before February 4, 2008. The Respondents are to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the violation(s) had been abated. 4. Case # 2007080854 - BCC vs. Julia E. Perkins & Gabriel Juan Mejia Medina The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Cristina Perez who was present. The Respondents were also present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 1O.02.06(B)(I)(A), 1O.02.06(B)(l)(E) & 1O.02.06(B)( I )(E)(I); eollier County Land Development Code, Section 22, Article II, Subsections 104.1.3.5 & 106.\.2; Florida Building Code 2004 Edition, Sec. 105.1 Unpermitted shed-type structure on estates-zones parcel Violation address: 3945 2th Ave. NE, Naples, FL 34120 A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondents on January 3. 2008 and January 4, 2008. The Investigator stated the violation had been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondents were found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $244. 23 on or before February 4, 2008. 5 _._-,"-"""',-~...- 161 8 J~ 4, 2008 18. Case # 2007090903 - BCC vs. Robin Okolski The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Azure Sorrels who was present. The Respondent was also present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 1O.02.06(B)(l )(A); Florida Building Code 2004 Edition, Secs. 105.l Building permits Violation address: 145 Capri Blvd., Naples, FL 34113 A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondent. The Investigator stated there is a possibility that a permit does exist. She will conduct further research. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to obtain a Collier County Building Permit or a Collier County Demolition Permit, all necessary inspections, and a Certificate of Completion on or before February 15, 2008, or afine of$100.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $212.44 on or before March 4, 2008. The Respondent is to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the violation(s) had been abated. The Special Magistrate ruled that, due to the unusual circumstances in this case, the Order would not take effect until Wednesday, January 9, 2008, to allow the Investigator some time to research the possibility of an existing permit. The Investigator is to contact the Special Magistrate's office with the results of her research. lfthe permit does exist, the case will be dismissed and Operational Costs will not be assessed. 19. Case # 2007100314 - BCC vs. Anthonv Siracusa The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas Keegan who was present. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 2.01.00(A) Inoperable/untagged vehicles Violation address: 1755 Bay St., Naples, FL 34112 A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondent on January 2, 2008. The Investigator stated the violation had been abated. 6 .---.,.--,,--- 16 :1 Q i,.",i 1 January 4, 2008 Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation(~) and was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $222.14 on or before February 4, 2008. 24. Case # 2007100131 - BCC vs. Ann P. Moore Tr., Ann P. Moore Rev Livin!! Trust UTD 12/30/03 The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas Keegan who was present. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-4 \ as amended, Sec. 4.05.03(A) Multiple vehicles parked/stored on unstablilized surface Violation address: 2837 Van Buren Ave. A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Katherine Ferrari, the Respondent's daughter, on behalf of the Respondent. Ms. Ferrari provided a copy of Letters of Plenary Guardianship of the Person and Property, attesting to her authority to act on behalfofthe Respondent. The Investigator stated the violation had been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of$209.32 on or before February 4, 2008. 22. Case # 2007080520 - BCC vs. Gale V. McCain Tr.. Gale V. McCain Rev. Trust The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas Keegan who was present. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-4\ as amended, Sec. 4.05.03(A) Vehicles parked/stored on grass on residential.zoned property Violation address: 22 Constitution Dr. A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondent who signed as Gail McCain-Brooks. The Investigator stated the violation had been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $215. 01 on or before February 4, 2008. 7 16r B l>ow I January 4, 2008 VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Motion for Imposition of Fines: 4. Case # 2006110409 - BCC vs. Carmen Vasallo The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas Keegan; The Respondent was also present. Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Carmelo Gomez served as translator. Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Secs. 6, 7 & 8 Accumulation oflitter Violation address: 1013 Newmarket Rd. W., Immokalee, FL The Respondent stated she would accept Investigator Gomez as a translator because she had no choice since she had been unable to find anyone to translate for her. Supervisor Dantini stated the County would not oppose the granting of a Continuance. The Special Magistrate GRANTED a Continuance in this case. The Respondent will be re-noticed of the new Hearing date in order to obtain a babysitter for her children and a Translator to bring with her to the new Hearing. 7. Case # 2004090245 - BCC vs. Cvnthia Jean Guv The County was represented by eollier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator John Santafemia. The Respondent was also present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41, Secs. lO.02.06(B)(1)(A) & lO.02.06(B)(1)(D)(I) Garage conversion without permit Violation address: 3037 55th Terr. SW Supervisor Dantini stated the violations had been abated. The County requested imposition of the Operational Costs in the amount of$124.18 together with fines in the amount of$9,350.00 for the period from June 2, 2005 through December 6,2005 (187 days @ $40.00), for a total fine of $9,474.18. The Respondent stated the garage conversion was pre-existing when she bought the property. She presented documentation to the Court attesting to the problems with contractors and delays caused by professional contractors that she hired who did not complete the work. The documentation was marked as Respondent's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines but, due to mitigating circumstances, abatement and due diligence by the Respondent, the Special Magistrate imposed payment only of Operational Costs of $124. 18. 8 ...".......""-"~._-........_,--~...,"_."._-~-_."'.'"... -. -- 16 ~ B JJuary 4, 2008 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Stipulations: 20. Case # 2007110041- BCC vs. Jose A. Ortel!a The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas Keegan who was present. The Respondent was also present. VioIation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 2.0I.00(A) Repeat Violation: Inoperable/untagged vehicle Violation Address: 3085 Karen Dr., Naples, FL 34112 The Special Magistrate asked if the Respondent understood both English and the violations against his property. He stated that he did understand. The Investigator introduced a photograph of the truck whieh was marked as County Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. The Respondent stated the truck belonged to his tenant. Since the tenant refused to comply, he asked the tenant to move from the premises. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violationM and was ordered to pay afine in the amount of $500.00 on or before February 4, 2008. The Respondent was ordered to affix a valid license plate and repair the vehicle, or to store the vehicle in a completely enclosed structure, or to remove it from the premises on or before January 9, 2007 unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. If the Respondent is unable to comply within this time frame, Code Enforcement may obtain contractor bid-out and assess the cost for the abatement to the Respondent. If necessary, assistance may be requestedfrom the Collier County Sheriff's Office. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $206. 11 on or before February 4, 2008. The Respondent is to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the violation(s) had been abated. The Special Magistrate advised the Respondent if he could not remove the vehicle by January 9, 2007, the fine of $1 00 per day would be retroactive from November 2, 2007 until the date of actual abatement. 21. Case # 2007110023 - BCC vs. Jose A. Ortel!a The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas Keegan who was present. The Respondent was also present. 9 161 B Jlary 4, 2008 Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 2.01.00(A) Repeat Violation: Inoperable/untagged vehicle Violation Address: 3069 Karen Dr., Naples, FL 34112 The Investigator introduced photographs of the vehicle which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. The Respondent stated the tenant operated an auto repair business from the property but that he has stopped. The Investigator stated the violation had been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to pay afine in the amount of $1,000.00 on or before February 4, 2008. The Respondent was ordered to pay Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $206. 11 on or before January 7,2008. The Respondent requested additional time to pay and the Special Magistrate extended the deadline to March 4, 2008for Case # 2007110041 and Case # 2007110023. RECESS: l1:12AM RECONVENED: 11:35AM V. PUBLIC HEARINGS B. Hearings: 8. Case # 20071 00 1 02 - BCC vs. Y ulav Exposito & Aide Exposito The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Carmello Gomez who was present The Respondent was also present. Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Secs. 6 & 7 Unlawful to litter, accumulation of litter Violation address: 5031 32nd Ave. SW The Respondent stated he was unable to bring a translator with him to the Hearing. The Special Magistrate GRANTED a Continuance in this case. 14. Case # 2007060699 - BCC vs. Hubert Jean Baptiste The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Jonathan Musse who was present. The Respondent was also present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 7(2)1O.02.06(B)(1)(A), 1O.02.06(B)(1)(E) 10 16 r B 1 January 4, 2008 and 1O.02.06(B)(1 )(E)(I) Fence permits Violation address: 626 N. 10th St., Immokalee, FL 34142 The Special Magistrate verified that the Respondent did not need the services of a translator. The Investigator introduced a copy of Permit #2005012746 (expired) which was marked as County Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. He also introduced a copy of Permit #2007081841, dated August 24,2007, which was marked as County Exhibit "B" and admitted into evidence. The Respondent stated he had hired a contractor to complete the work but the contractor did not obtain the Certificate of Completion and did not tell him. The Respondent introduced a copy of a eollier County Correct Work Order which was marked as Respondent's Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. The Investigator stated the work has been done, but he has not obtained a Certificate of Completion. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation(~) and was ordered to obtain either a Collier County Building Permit or a Collier County Demolition Permit, all necessary inspections, and a Certificate of Completion on or before February 4,2008, or afine of$100.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $234. OJ on or before February 4, 2008. The Respondent is to notify the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the violation(~) had been abated. 13. Case # 2007070119 - Bee vs. Julius Bembrv The Hearing was requested by eollier County Code Enforcement Investigator Jonathan Musse who was present. The Respondent was also present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 2.01.00(A) Multiple inoperable/untagged vehicles Violation address: 1009 Ringo Lane, Immokalee, FL 34142 The Investigator stated he spoke with the Respondent's son-in-law in July 2007. The son- in-law refused to allow him access to take photographs of the property. In November, the Investigator was still not allowed access although the Respondent's grandson told him the vehicles had been removed from the property. The Investigator introduced two photographs which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidcnce. II ;l')'t",> B 1 January 4,2008 161 The Respondent stated his son-in-law is basically uncooperative with everyone. He works in ajunk yard and repairs cars at home as a hobby. He stated there are 3 personal cars on the premises which are operable but he is not sure if the license plates on the vehicles are current. The Respondent stated he does not reside on the property and has repeatedly warned his son-in-law about not accumulating vehicles. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation('~ and was ordered to affIX a valid license plate and repair the vehicle(s), or to store the vehicle(s) in a completely enclosed structure, or to remove the vehicles from the premises on or before January 9,2007 or afine of $50. 00 per vehicle per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. Ifthe Respondent is unable to comply within this time frame, Code Enforcement may obtain contractor bid-out and assess the cost for the abatement to the Respondent. If necessary, assistance may be requestedfrom the Collier County Sheriff's Office to perform a site inspection. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of$227.33 on or before March 4, 2008. The Respondent is to notify the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the violation(~) had been abated. 2. Case # 2006081160 - BCC vs. Noe Garcia and Enedina Lopez The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Michelle Scavone who was present. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 1O.02.06(B)(1 )(A), I 0.02.06(B)(1 )(D) & 1O.02.06(B)(1)(D)(l) of the Collier County Land Development Code; Florida Building eode 2004 Edition, Sec. 106.1.2 Building permits Violation address: 661 3'd St. NW The Investigator introduced two photographs of the property which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. The Investigator stated both the property and the Courthouse were posted and there was a return receipt in the tile which had been signed by Enedina Lopez on September 26, 2006. The Investigator introduced a copy of a fax, dated April 4, 2007, from J.C. Kosinski Engineering, Inc. containing drawings of the pump house enclosure which was marked as County's Exhibit "B" and admitted into evidence. The Investigator stated no permits had been issued for the property. 12 .._,-_._,~-.,._",--, __~_<~~..~"..__.u".-"~~",,'-".---.,.-----""'--- 16 I-B. Jan14,2008 The Investigator introduced photographs of the painted shed and pump house, dated January 3, 2008, which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "c" and admitted into evidence. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to obtain either a Collier County Building Permit or a Collier County Demolition Permit, all necessary inspections and a Certificate of Completion on or before February 4,2008, or afine of $100. 00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $263.36 on or before February 4, 2008. The Respondent is to notify the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the violation(s) had been abated. 3. Case # 2007100032 - Bee vs. Jason Bottie:lia The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Mario Bono who was present. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Florida Building Code 2004 Edition, Secs. 424.2.17.1 to 424.2.17.14, and Article IV, Property Maintenance Code, Sec. 22.228, Paragraph 15 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances Unsecured pool screen and pool maintenance Violation address: 102 eedar erest Ct. The Investigator stated the owner does not reside in Florida. The owner stated he purchased the property without inspection as an investment but that it was vacant. The pool has dirty, stagnant water and is a health issue. The damaged enclosure screens allowed access into the pool area and is a safety issue. The Investigator introduced photographs of the property, dated October 1,2007, which were marked as eounty's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. He also introduced photographs of the property dated January 3, 2008 which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "B" and admitted into evidence. The Investigator stated the Notice of Violation had been sent to the Respondent via Certified mail, and the property had been posted. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to immediately secure the upper- haifofthe pool screen door on or before January 9, 2008 or afine of $250. 00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent was ordered to clean the pool and provide clean water on or before January 11, 2008 or afine of $250. 00 per day will be imposedfor each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special 13 ...__.~-,.~".,-,.....",._-,,_.~,-,..'" 161 B 1 January 4, 2008 Magistrate. If the Respondent is unable to comply within this time frame, Code Enforcement may hire a licensed contractor to abate the violations and the cost will be assessed to the Respondent. The Re~pondent was ordered to pay the Operational Cost.. incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $203. 41 on or before February 4, 2008. The Respondent is to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the violation had been abated. 6. Case # 2007090519 - BCC vs. Pedro A. Ibarbia & Isabel R. Ibarbia The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Stephen Athey who was present. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 2.01.00(B)(3) Commercial vehicles(s)/equipment in residential districts Violation address: 696 1041h Ave. N., Naples, FL 34108 The Investigator stated the violation had been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondents were found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of$219.44 on or before February 4, 2008. (NOTE: Investigator stated during the Hearing that the Violation was a "Covered utility trailer parked and stored in the driveway in front of dwelling. '1 9. Case # 2007090337 - BCC vs. Georl!:e Cirabisi & Vickie Lea Cirabisi The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Glenn Karr who was present. The Respondents were not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6, Subsec. 15 Pool maintenance Violation address: 1935 Empress Ct., Naples, FL 34110 The Investigator stated he had received a complaint about the condition of the pool. The property was vacant and there was no electricity. The owner stated that he was filing bankruptcy and was unable to repair the property. The Investigator introduced a photograph of the property which was marked as County Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. 14 ...---,,----~~._~-_._--_._-._..~-"_. 161 R 1 January ,2008 Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to clean the pool and provide clean pool water on or before January 9, 2008 or afine of $250. 00 per day will be imposedfor each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Cost~. incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $244.47 on or before February 4, 2008. The Respondent is to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the violation had been abated. 10. Case # 2007090300 - BCC vs. Kerry Hvppolite The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator John Santafemia who was present. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6, Subsecs. 121 & 12L Ord.04-58, Sec. 7, Subsec. 2 Minimum housing Violation address: 2640 Santa Barbara Blvd., Naples, FL 34116 The Investigator introduced three photographs of the property, dated September 10,2007, which were marked as eounty's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. The property and the Courthouse were posted. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to pay for a Collier County Rental Registration on or before January 11, 2008, or afine of $25. 00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent was ordered to repair the broken windows, screens, and air conditioning unit on or before January 11, 2008 or afine of $250. 00 per day will be imposedfor each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $259.74 on or before February 4, 2008. The Respondent is to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the violation had been abated. 11. Case # 2007070801- BCC vs. Mateo F. Avala The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Jonathan Musse who was present. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sees. 1.04.01,2.02.03 & 2.01.00(B) Recreational vehicle being utilized for living/sleeping purposes on 15 -"""-"~~~_._.,._,--~,,....,, <'" B 1 161 January 4,2008 residential-zoned property Violation address: 319 N. 6th St., Immokalee, FL 34142 The Investigator introduced 5 pages of photographs which were marked as County Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. He also introduced a one page document verifying abatement which was marked as County Exhibit "B" and admitted into evidence. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $225. 12 on or before February 4, 2008. 12. Case # 2007070644 - BCC vs. Rodrie:uez Rentals Inc. The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Jonathan Musse who was present. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04.41 as amended, Sees. 1O.02.06(B)(1)(A), 1O.02.06(B)(1)(E) & 1 0.02.06(B)(1 )(E)(I) Building permits Violation address: 1613 Gross Ave., Immokalee, FL 34142 The Investigator stated the violations had been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $233. 93 on or before February 4, 2008. 17. Case # 2007070649 - BCC vs. James M. Poteet The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Azure Sorrels who was present. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sees. 10.02.06(B)(1)(A), 1O.02.06(B)(l)(E) & 1O.02.06(B)(l)(E)(I), Florida Building eode 2204 Edition, Sec. 105.1 Building permits Violation address: 71 Isle of St. Thomas The Investigator stated the County had withdrawn this case. 23. Case # 2007100819 - BCC vs. Jill J. Weaver The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas Keegan who was present. 16 ------,_._---_.,-_."_."'---~ 16\ R 1 January 4, 2008 The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Secs. 2.01.00(A) Repeat Violation: Inoperable/untagged vehicles Violation address: 4620 Acadia Ln. The Investigator introduced four photographs of the property which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation(~) and was ordered to affIX a valid license plate and repair the vehicle(s), or to store the vehicle(s) in a completely enclosed structure, or to remove the vehicles from the premises on or before January 9, 2007 or afine of $1 00. 00 per day will be imposed retroactive from October 24, 2007 until the date of abatement, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. If the Respondent is unable to comply within this time frame, Code Enforcement may obtain contractor bid-out and assess the cost for the abatement to the Respondent. If necessary, assistance may be requestedfrom the Collier County Sheriff's Office to perform a site inspection. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $206. 99 on or before March 4, 2008. The Respondent is to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the violation(s) had been abated. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Motion for Impositiott of Fines: I. Case # 2007060653 - BCC vs. Richard Carter The eounty was represented by Code Enforcement Supervisor Carol Sykora and Investigator Reggie Smith. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Collier County Code of Laws & Ordinances, Article VI, Sec. 22-231(5) Private pool maintenance Violation address: 196 Briarcliff Ln., Naples, FL 34113 The Investigator introduced the following documents which were marked as eounty Exhibits and admitted into evidence: Exhibit "A" - a copy of the proof of delivery on December 21, 2007 from the US Postal Service website Exhibit "8" - copy of Affidavit of Posting by Investigator Mario Bono dated December 18, 2007 Exhibit "c" - photographs of the posting at the property and the Courthouse Supervisor Sykora stated the violations had not been abated and fines continued to accrue. 17 ...~___",~.__"~.,,~.,~_,,,',M~'~'___.~'_'_' .'~...~ 161' B 1 January 4,2008 Supervisor Sykora stated the County was requesting imposition of the Operational Costs in the amount of$233.62 together with fines in the amount of $17,250.00 for the period from October 27,2007 through January 3,2008 (69 days @ $250/day), for a total fine of $17,483.62. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 2. Case # 2005051118 - BCC vs. Jill J. Weaver & Henrv Tesno The County was represented by Code Enforcement Supervisor Carol Sykora and Investigator Thomas Keegan. The Respondents were not present. Violation(s): Ord. 99-5], Sec. 7 Litter on property Violation address: 3203 Woodside Ave., Naples, FL 34112 Supervisor Sykora stated the violation had been abated. The County requested imposition only of Operational eosts of$219.29 The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 3. Case # 2006100087 - BCC vs. Jill J. Weaver The eounty was represented by Code Enforcement Supervisor Carol Sykora and Investigator Thomas Keegan. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Sec. II, Para. 1 Weed overgrowth Violation address: 4620 Acadia Ln. Supervisor Sykora stated the violation had been abated. The County requested imposition only of Operational Costs of $144.17 The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 6. Case # 2006040453 - BCC vs. Russell J. Leehaul! Tr., Leehaul! Familv Tr. The County was represented by eode Enforcement Supervisor Carol Sykora and Investigator Heinz Box. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 7(2) Failure to register rental property Violation address: 422] Gulfstream Dr., Naples, FL 34112 Supervisor Sykora stated the violation had been abated. IS _...,_",..~_..,_,_.,__."~.,.~._~~,_"__,_,."._..,.n~ ,_,__ _,_,. 16 B Janl4, 2008 The County requested imposition only of Operational Costs of $154.54. The Investigator stated he contacted the Respondent who confirmed that he had paid the Operational Costs. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. VII. OLD BUSINESS - None VIII. CONSENT AGENDA - None IX. REPORTS The Special Magistrate stated a Public Forum would be held on January 31,2008 at 9:00AM in the BCC Chambers. The purpose of the Forum is to give the public an opportunity to learn more about how a case comes before the Special Magistrate and the Hearing process. There will be mock hearings with public participation invited. X. NEXT MEETING DATE -January 18, 2008 There being ttO further business for the good of the County, the Hearing was adjourned by Order of the Special Magistrate at 1:30 PM. COLLIER COUNTY SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING These Minutes wep: approved by the Special Magistrate on as presented v' , or as amended . tiN 101 I I 19 _,,_..,,_..,w,__--..,__.._,..~......,._._~.,_______~.~_____.._~_'~__...--., i1tot; 161 ~, 1 1j .,~ January 18,2008 .:'t MINUTES OF THE HEARING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY ;; f)P .~ " ,'; SPECIAL MAGISTRATE Fiala ~~ Y, Halas ' Henning Coyle _ Coletta ,::.,ll,':I'C; Naples, Florida, January 18, 2008 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Special Magistrate, in and for the County of Collier having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 AM in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F," 3'd floor, of the Government Complex, Naples, Florida, and the following persons were present: SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: Honorable Brenda Garretson Sue Chapin, Secretary to the Special Magistrate STAFF PRESENT: Gary Dantini, Code Enforcement Supervisor Bendisa Marku, Code Enforcement Operations Coordinator Mile. CClIIfI: 1 G I 6 I Date: Item': Copies to: J 161 B ;1 January 18, 2008 I. CALL TO ORDER The Meeting was called to order by the Honorable Special Magistrate Brenda Garretson at 9:00 AM. All those testifying at the proceeding did so under oath. A. Hearing Rules and Regulations were given by Special Magistrate Garretson. Special Magistrate Garretson noted that, prior to conducting the Hearing, the Respondents were given an opportunity to speak with their Investigating Officer for a Resolution by Stipulation; looking for compliance without being punitive. RECESS: 9:14 AM REeONVENED: 9:32 AM II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Bendisa Marku. Code Enforcement Operations Coordinator, proposed the following changes: (a) Under Item VCR): . ease # 2007080938 - Charles Haines was removed as a Respondent . Case # 2007080683 - BCC vs. Janet St. Onge - the Ordinance Sections were changed to Secs. 1.04.01 and 2.02.03 (b) Under Item VI(A): . Case # 2007020739 - BCC vs. Jose A. Ortega - The violation address was changed to 3107 Karen Drive, Naples, FL 34112 (c) The following cases with WITHDRAWN by the County due to payment of fines: . ease # 2007030778 - BCe vs. Romana Lipkova & Marian Yanko . Case # 2004050653 - BCC vs. Dana Watson · Case # 2004090039 - BCC vs. Rosario M. Sosa & Mercedes Sosa The Special Magistrate approved the Agenda as amended, subject to changes made during the course of the Hearing at the discretion of the Special Magistrate. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Minutes of the Hearing held on January 4, 2008 were reviewed by the Special Magistrate and approved as submilled. IV. MOTIONS A. Motions for eontinuance: NONE Sue Chapin, Secretary to the Special Magistrate, stated Stipulations had been reached in the following cases: . Agenda # 8 - BCC ys. Tereatha Hawkins Estate · Agenda # 5 - BCC ys. Janet St.; Onge . Agenda # 6 - BCe vs. Janet St. Onge . Agenda # 7 ~ BeC vs. Janet St. Onge 2 16~ I '-1!lfII ~,,' L: Ji'.nuary 18, 2008 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Stipulations: 8. Case # 2007080437 - BCC vs. Tereatha Hawkins Estate The Hearing was requested Collier County Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha who was present. The Respondent was represented by Diane Woolfork. Violation(s): Ord. 04-58 as amended, Sec.6, Subsec.] 21 Minimum housing Violation address: ]209 N. 19th Terr., Immokalee, FL A Stipulation had been agreed to by Diane Woo!fork who is the daughter of the Decedent. Upon questioning by the Special Magistrate, Ms. Woolfork stated Probate proceedings had not been opened. She also stated the Decedent had other children. The Special Magistrate stated she would accept the Stipulation contingent upon receiving letters of authorization Irom Ms. Woolfork's siblings allowing her to represent them as heirs of the Estate. The Investigator stated the violation had been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to pay Operational Costs incurred by Code EnjfJrcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $250.39 on or before March 18,2008. The Special Magistrate ruled that the Order would not be recorded until proof of authorization had been sabmitted to Code EnjfJrcement. The Investigator was requested to forward the information to the Office of the Special Magistrate. 5. Case # 2007080683 - BCe vs. Janet St. On!!e The Hearing was requested Collier County eode Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha who was present. The Respondent had been present earlier and entered into a Stipulation, but left before the Hearing could be heard. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Secs. 1.04.01 & 2.02.03 Unlicensed/inoperable vehicles Violation address: 11399 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34113 A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondent. The Investigator stated the violations had not been abated. 3 r.",j" B lanuary 18,2008 161 Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY (~rthe alleged violationM and was ordered to obtain and affix a valid license plate for each vehicle, or to store the vehicles in a completely enclosed structure, or to remove them from the premises on 01' before January 23, 2008, 01' a fine of $50. 00 per day will be imposed for each day the violations remain thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $229.2301101' before Februmy 18, 20(}8. The Respondent is to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the violation(s) had been abated. 6. Case # 2007080682 - BCe vs. Janet St. One:e The Hearing was requested Collier County eode Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha who was present. The Respondent had been present earlier and entered into a Stipulation, but left before the Hearing could be heard. Violation(s): Ord. 04-58 as amended, Sec. 7(2) Rental registration Violation address: 11399 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34] 13 A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Re;pondent. The Investigator stated the violation was abated on January 6, 2008. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to pay Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $227. 68 on or before February 18, 2008. 7. Case # 2007080700 - BCC vs. Janet St. One:e The Hearing was requested Collier County Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha who was present. The Respondent had been present earlier and entered into a Stipulation, but left before the Hearing could be heard. Violation(s): Ord. 04-58 as amended, Sec. 6, Subsecs. 9, 11, ]28, ]2], 12P, ]9A, 1ge and 20 Minimum housing Violation address: 11399 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 341 13 A Stipulation had been agreed to by the Respondent. The Investigator stated the violation had not been abated. 4 J ocr, /~ / I -...iFlw 1~ "~"(' . ,. 16 ij J n :ry 18, 2008 Finding the Notice of !fiaring had been properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alle1;f!d violation(s) and was ordered to repair all the Minimum Housing violationyUsted on the Property Maintenance Inspection Report dated November 17, j.!#J'TOn or before January 25, 2008, or a fine of $250.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violations remain thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of$227.15 on or before February 18, 2008. The Respondent is to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the violation(~') had been abated. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS B. Hearings: 4. ease # 2007080938 - BCC vs. Linda Haines & Williams Haines The Hearing was requested Collier County Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha who was present. The Respondents were also present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6, Subsecs. 12B, 12e & 12/ Property Maintenance Violation address: 3087 Lunar St." Naples, FL 34112 The Investigator introduced photographs of the property taken August 20, 2007 which were marked as County's Exhibits 1-9 and admitted into evidence. The Respondent, Linda Haines, stated she was aware of the condition of the vacant mobile home but both she and her son, William Haines, had been hospitalized on several occasions due to severe medical problems. She stated she lives next door to the property and that it is fenced. She verified that she was divorced from Charles Haines whose name was removed as a Respondent. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondents were found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and were ordered to obtain a Collier County Demolition Permit, inspections and a Certificate of Completion on or before May 18, 2008, or afine of $250. 00 per day will be imposedfor each day the violations remain thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. If the Respondents are unable to comply within this timeframe, Code Enforcement may obtain contractor bid-out and assess the cost for the abatement to the Respondent. If necessary, assistance may be requestedfrom the Collier County Sheriff's Office. The Respondents were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $244.99 on or before May 18, 2008. The Respondents were ordered to maintain contact with the Investigator and to contact him on or before March 18, 2008 with a status report. 5 161 B 1 January 18,2008 RECESS: 10:17 AM RECONVENED: 10:35AM VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Motion for Imposition of Fines: 8. Case # 2006110511 - BCC vs. Oscar Garateio & Nircia Alvarez Garateio The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and Collier County eode Enforcement Investigator Michelle Scavone. The Respondent, Nircia Alvarez Garatejo, was present and also represented her husband, Oscar Garatejo. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 1.04.0 I (B). 2.02.03 & 2.03.0 I (B) Tile stored on Estates-zoned areas Violation address: 3271 22"d Ave. NE Supervisor Dantini stated the violations had been abated. The County requested imposition of the Operational eosts in the amount of$276.53, together with fines in the amount of $1, I 00.00 for the period from October 13, 2007 through October 24,2005 (II days @ $100.00), for a total fine of $1,276.53. The Respondent stated she had attempted to remove the tile within the time frame as previously ordered but, due to the weight of the tiles, required a truck which broke down and delayed completion. She stated the property is now in foreclosure due to their financial situation and requested a reduction of the fine. The Investigator stated the Respondent was very cooperative and maintained contact during the process. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines hut due to mitigating circumstances, the Special Magistrate reduced the fines to a total of $476.53, including Operational Co.\.ts. 21. Case # 2004100730 - BeC vs. Alfredo & Miradis MiraIles The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Heinz Box. The Respondents were present. Alex Miralles served as translator for his parents. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sees. 5.06 & 10.02.06(8) Wall signs without permits Violation address: 105 I" Street S., lmmokalee, FL 34] 42 The Investigator stated the violations had been abated. 6 J[ 6 , ~anuary~, 20~8 The County requested imposition of the Operational Costs in the amount of $261.53, together with fines in the amount of $4,850.00 for the period from August 6, 2005 through October 31,2005 (97 days @ $50.00), for a total fine of $5, 111.53. The Respondent stated the tenant erected the sign without permission. He stated he felt it was unfair for him to be responsible for his tenant's violation. He was unaware of his right to have the tenant evicted. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines hut due to mitigating circumstances, the Special Magistrate reduced the fines to a total of $I, 761.53, including Operational Costs. 22. Case # 2007020295 - BCC vs. Miradis Miralles The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and eollier eounty eode Enforcement Investigator Heinz Box. The Respondent was present. Alex Miralles served as translator for his mother. Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 7(2) Failing to register rental property Violation address: 431 Wells Street, lmmokalee, FL 34142 Supervisor Dantini stated the violations had been abated. The County requested payment only of Operational Costs of$265.70. The Respondent stated she did not know she had to register the property but did so as soon as she was advised of the violation. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 25. Case # 2007050391 - BCC vs. Octavio Carillo and Y oana Carrillo The County was represented by Collier County eode Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and eollier eounty Code Enforcement Investigator Jonathan Musse. The Respondents were present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 Sec. 2.0 I.OO(C) Commercial vehicles Violation address: 1209 N. 18th St., Immokalee, FL 34142 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated. The County requested imposition of the Operational Costs in the amount of$169.38, together with fines in the amount of $1,500.00 for the period from September 25,2007 through October 10,2007 (15 days@$100.00), for a total fine of$I,659.38. 7 161 n J. . ~I/ ' ,. Janu.18, 2008 The Respondent stated the Operational Costs had been paid and produced a copy of a money order which was marked as Respondent's Exhibit "A" and entered into evidence. He stated that he is a seasonal worker who is away from his property for long periods of time. He was unaware of the violations until the mail caught up with him. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines but due to mitigating circumstances, the Special Magistrate reduced the fine to a total of $750.00. 26. Case # 2005030605 - BCC vs. Jose A. Orte!!a The County was represented by eollier eounty Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini. The Respondent was also present. Violation(s): Ord. 99-51, Secs. 6 & 7 Litter Violation address: 3107 Karen Drive, Naples, FL 34112 The Special Magistrate asked the Respondent if he required a translator to understand the proceedings, he declined. Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated by the eounty On December 1.2005. The County requested imposition of the Operational Costs in the amount of $1 04.42, and abatement fees in the amount of $300.00, together with fines in the amount of $22,800.00 for the period from June 8, 2005 through November 7,2005 (152 days @ $150.00), for a total fine of $23,204.42. The Respondent stated he lives in Fort Myers and his tenant assured him that he would remove the litter, appear in eourt and pay the fine. The Respondent also stated he was unable to check on the tenant because of the hours that he works and that he trusted him. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 27. Case # 2005040514 - BCC vs. Jose A. Orte!!a The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini. The Respondent was also present. Violatiott(s): Ord. 99-51, Secs. 7 Litter Violation address: 3069 Karen Drive, Naples, FL 34112 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated by the County. 8 161 B Janul 18. 2008 The eounty requested imposition of the Operational Costs in the amount of$ I 52.13, and abatement fees in the amount of $200.00, together with fines in the amount of $14,500.00 for the period from July 16,2005 through December 1,2005 (145 days @ $100.00), for a total fine of$14,852.13. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 28. Case # 2007020741 - BCC vs. Jose A. Ortel!a The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas Keegan. The Respondent was also present. Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Secs. 6, 7 & 8 Accumulation of Litter Violation address: 3085 Karen Drive, Naples, FL 34112 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated by the County. The County requested imposition of the Operational Costs in the amount of$ I 20.94, and abatement fees in the amount of$800.00, together with a civil penalty of$500 for the repeat violation, and fines in the amount of$15,000.00 for the period from April 28, 2007 through June 27, 200 (60 days @ $250.00), for a total fine of$16,420.94. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. The Special Magistrate asked the Respondent if he had evicted the tenants who caused the problems. He stated he had not because they were family and had no where else to go. The Special Magistrate asked the Respondent why he had not paid more attention to this properties after he received the Notices of Violation. He had no answer. She asked him ifhe realized that his inattentiveness made him seem as ifhe were an irresponsible owner. He agreed. 29. Case # 2007020739 - BCC vs. Jose A. Ortel!a The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas Keegan. The Respondent was also present. Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Secs. 6, 7 & 8 Accumulation of Litter Violation address: 3\ 07 Karen Drive, Naples, FL 34112 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated by the County. The County requested imposition of the Operational Costs in the amount of$120.94, and 9 r", JJahu118,i008 abatement fees in the amount of$1 ,360.00, together with a civil penalty of $250.00 for the repeat violation, and fines in the amount of$ll ,250.00 for the period from April 28, 2007 through June 11,2007 (45 days @ $250.00), for a total fine of $12,980.94. ,;;.. 6" ~] "- ;" f, I J . , ,_i!~ The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 30. ease # 2005120130 - BCC vs. Jose A. Ortel!a The County was represented by eollier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and eode Enforcement Investigator Heinz Box. The Respondent was also present. Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Secs. 6, 7 & 8 Accumulation of Litter Violation address: 3107 Karen Drive, Naples, FL 34112 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated by the Respondent. The County requested imposition of the Operational Costs in the amount of$166.33, together with fines in the amount of $ I 0,800.00 for the period from February 24, 2007 through June 11,2007 (108 days @ $100.00), for a total fine of $10,966.33. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. The Special Magistrate stated the total fines due for all of the Respondent's cases is $78,424.76. She stated there were no mitigating circumstances that would allow her to reduce the fines. REeESS: 11:55 AM REeONVENED: 12:17 PM V. PUBLIC HEARINGS B. Hearings: 1. ease # 2007080213 - BCC vs. Gilda Navarro The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Glenn Karl' who was present. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Florida Building Code 2007 as amended, Secs. 424.2.17.1 & 424.2.17.1.8 Swimming pool without fencing or enclosure Violation Address: 9741 Campbell Cir, Naples, FL 34109 The Investigator introduced a photograph of the property which was marked as County Exhibit "I" and admitted into evidence. 10 16' B 111 -!iuary 18, 2008 The Investigator stated the property was vacant and subject into foreclosure. He stated the Notice of Violation was personally served on the owner. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and was ordered to obtain the appropriate Collier County Permit to construct a permanent fence, impections and a Certification of Completion on or before February 18, 2008, or afine of $1 00. 00 per day will be imposed for each day the violations remain unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during tlte prosecution of tit is case in the amount of $252. 25 on or before February 18, 2008. The Respondent is to notifY tlte Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to concur the violation(s) Itad been abated. 2. Case # 2007090460 - BCC vs. Wells Far!!O Bank c/o David J. Stern The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Mario Bono who was present. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Florida Building eode 2004 as amended, Secs. 424.2.17.1 & 424.2.17.1.14 and Florida Statute Chapter 515 as adopted by Collier County Pool screen door panel torn and unsecured from pool enclosure frame Violation Address: 313 Bay Meadows Dr., Naples, FL 34113 The Special Magistrate stated that David J. Stern was an attorney representing the Respondent and was, therefore, not a party to this action. The Investigator introduced photographs of the property which were marked as County's Exhibits "J" and "2,"and were admitted into evidence. The Investigator stated the violation had been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, and finding the violation(s) did exist but was CORRECTED prior to the Hearing, tlte Respondent was found GUILTY of tlte alleged violationM and was ordered to pay Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $222.2 7 on or before February 18, 2008. 3. ease # 2007060712 - Bee vs. Paul Huttter & Kellv J_ Hunter The Hearing was requested by eollier County Code Enforcement Investigator John Marsh who was present The Respondents were not present. Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Secs. 6 & 7 Litter Violation address: 3428 Toledo Way II ", Eb 'I. j"" \ If'", ' 1 t"1 Januar I Jz008 The Investigator introduced photographs of the property which were marked as County's Exhibits "]" and "6,"and were admitted into evidence. He stated the property was vacant, and subject to foreclosure. The property and the Courthouse had been posted. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondents were found GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and were ordered to remove all litter on or before January 25, 2008, or afine of $1 00. 00 per day will be imposed for each day the violations remain unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. If the Re~pondents are unable to comply within this time frame, Code Enforcement llIay obtain contractor bid-out and assess the cost for the abatement to the Respondents. If necessary, assistance may be requestedfrolll the Collier County Sheriff's Office. The Re~pondents were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $337.61 on or bej;n'e February 18, 2008. The Respondents are to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours 0/ a workday to concur the violation had been abated. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Motion for Imposition of Fines: I. Case # 2007070252 - BCC vs. Humberto L. Jaen The County was represented by eollier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Oantini and Code Enforcement Investigator John Santafemia. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6, Subsecs. 1,2,5,6,9, ] 1,121, 12J, 120, 12P, 12R, 15, 19C & 20 Numerous minimum housing violations Violation address: 824 981h Ave. N., Naples, FL 34 108 The Special Magistrate noted that "Section 6" had been omitted from the Agenda, and amended it to include the reference to the Ordinance Section. Supervisor Oantini stated the violations had not been abated and fines continued to accrue. The eounty requested imposition of the Operational eosts in the amount of$337.08, together with fines in the amount of $17,500.00 for the period from November 10, 2007 through January 18,2008 (70 days @ $250/day), for a total fine of$ 1 7,837.08. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion/or the Imposition of Fines. 2. Case # 2007050023 - BCC vs. Janet Perlata The County was represented by eollier eounty Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Oantini and Code Enforcement Investigator John Santafemia. The Respondent was not present. 12 1618 (\~'l, Jan~y 18, 2008 Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6, Subsecs. I, 8, 9, II, 12C, 121, 12N, 120, 12P, 19A, 190, and 20 Numerous minimum housing violations Violation address: 2365 55'" Terr. SW, Naples, FL 34 108 The Special Magistrate again noted that "Section 6" had been omitted from the Agenda, and amended it to include the reference to the Ordinance Section. Supervisor Oantini stated the violations had not been abated and fines continued to accrue. The County requested imposition of the Operational eosts in the amount of$323.20, together with fines in the amount of $17,500.00 for the period from November 10, 2007 through January 18,2008 (70 days @ $250/day), for a total fine of$17,823.20. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 3. Case # 2006100196 - BCC vs. Jill J. Weaver The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Oantini and Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6, Subsecs. I & 2 Minimum housing Violation address: 3064 Van Buren Ave., Naples, FL 34112 Supervisor Oantini stated the violation had been abated although the Respondent had not provided proof of reimbursement to the tenant. The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of$236.81, together with a civil fine in the amount of $500.00, for a total fine of $736.81. The Investigator stated he could not verify that the tenant had been reimbursed since the tenant had moved. He requested that this requirement be removed from the previous Order of the Special Magistrate. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines and approved the request to remove the reimbursement requirement. 4. Case # 2007090022 - BCC vs. Jill J. Weaver The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Oantini and Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 2.01.00(A) Unlicensed/inoperable vehicles Violation address: 3080 Van Buren Ave., Naples, FL 34112 13 16 Bnuary}, 2008 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated. The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of $234.] I, together with a civil fine in the amount of $500.00, for a total fine of $734.11. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 5. Case # 2007080937 - BCC vs. Jill J. Weaver & Henry Testto The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha. The Respondents were not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-4] as amended, Sec. 2.01.00(A) Unlicensed/inoperable vehicles Violation address: 3072 Van Buren Ave., Naples, FL 34112 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated. The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of$249.56, together with a civil fine in the amount of $500.00, for a total fine of $749.56. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 6. Case # 2007090202 - BCC vs. Jill J. Weaver The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec. 2.01.00(A) Unlicensed/inoperable vehicles Violation address: 3064 Van Buren Ave., Naples, FL 34112 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated. The eounty requested imposition of Operational eosts of$229.04, together with a civil fine in the amount of$500.00, for a total fine of$729.04. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 7. Case # 2007080921 - BCC vs. Jill J. Weaver The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha. The Respondents were not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6, Subsec. 7, 121, 12L Repeat Minimum housing violations 14 ~-"-~----,~__.,_... n""_'..._.o, ...__.___ 16 I JaJBy Ii,}08 Violation address: 3080 Van Buren Ave., Naples, FL 34112 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had not been abated and fines continue to accrue. The eounty requested imposition of Operational Costs of$247.07, a civil fine in the amount of $ ] ,000.00, together with fines in the amount of $24, 150.00 for the period from November] 0,2007 through January 18,2008 (69 days @ $350/day), for a total fine of $25,397.07. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for tlte Imposition of Fines. 9. Case # 2007060683 - Bce vs. Peter E. Thomas The eounty was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and Code Enforcement Investigator Stephen Athey. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, LDC Sec. 2.01.00(A) Unlicensed vehicles Violation address: 74896']' Ave. N., Naples, FL 34108 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated. The County requested imposition of Operational eosts of $232.12 Tlte Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 10. Case # 2007060682 - BCC vs. Peter E. Thomas The eounty was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and Code Enforcement Investigator Stephen Athey. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Sec. 7 Accumulation of Litter Violation address: 748 96]h Ave. N.. Naples, FL 34108 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had not been abated and fines continue to accrue. The eounty requested imposition of Operational eosts of $232. I 2, together with fines in the amount of $9,800.00 for the period fi'om October 13, 2007 through January 18, 2008 (98 days @ $1 OO/day), for a total fine of $] 0,032.12 Tlte Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 11. Case # 2007070771 - BCC vs. Fernando Rodrif!uez The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and Code Enforcement Investigator Carmelo Gomez. 15 16' B" Inuary 18,2008 The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 03-37, Sec(s). 5A, 58 & 5C Right of Way permits Violation address: 1737 42"d St. SW, Naples, FL 34116 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had not been abated and fines continue to accrue. The County requested imposition of Operational eosts of$227.55, together with fines in the amount of $19,600.00 for the period from October 13,2007 through January 18,2008 (98 days @ $200/day), for a total fine of $19,827.55. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 13. Case # 2007070221 - BCC vs. Saint Juste Florestant & Joan S. Florestattt The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and eode Enforcement Investigator earmelo Gomez. The Respondents were not present. Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Sec. 6 & 7 Unlawful litter & accumulation of litter Violation address: 283 I 47th Terr. SW, Naples, FL 34116 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated in November, 2007. The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of$259.80. The Investigator stated the property was sold in December, 2007. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 16. Case # 2006010411- BCC vs. Juan Barnhart The County was represented by Collier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and eode Enforcement Investigator John Santafemia. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6 Tenants in dwelling exceeds allowable number Violation address: 614 Newmarket Road, Immokalee, FL 34142 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated. The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of $177 .45. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 16 'fI .9' ; r""", G' ',;, ,,~_..; t-" c~ January 18, ,zOO8 17. Case # 2005020409 - BCC vs. Saint Juste Florestant & Joan S. Florestant The County was represented by eollier eounty Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and Code Enforcement Investigator Carmelo Gomez. The Respondents were not present. Violation(s): Ord. 03- I 4, Sec. 5& 7 Residential property without required posted address Violation address: 2831 47th Terr. SW, Naples, FL 34116 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated. The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of $85.19, together with a fine of $25.00, for a total fine of $11 0.19. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines, 18. Case # 2007030755 - BCC vs. Crvstal M. Holler The County was represented by Collier eounty eode Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and Code Enforcement Investigator John Santafemia. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 7(2) Rental registration Violation address: 795 94th Ave. N., Naples, FL 34108 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had not been abated and tines continue to accrue. The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of $255.26, together with fines in the amount of$3, 150.00 for the period from September 15,2007 through January 18,2008 (126 days @$25/day), for a total fine of$3,405.26. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 19. Case # 2007040275 - BCC vs. Henrv Testto & Jill Weaver The County was represented by Collier County eode Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and eode Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha. The Respondents were not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 6, Subsec(s). 1-5,8-11,120, 12H, 121, 12K, 12L, 120, 12P,19B Minimum housing Violation address: 3137 Lunar Street., Naples, FL 34112 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had not been abated. The Investigator stated there were two separate Hearings on this property: June 15,2007 and July 6, 2007. 17 "-, ~ -r ~l ')1 i J,..~ ~ "I Anuary lli) 2008 ....-. Hearinl! #1 - June 15,2007: The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of $224.44, a civil fine in the amount of$250.00, together with fines in the amount of$47,500 for the period from July 13,2007 through January ]8,2008 (190 days@$250/day), for a total fine of $47,994.44 Hearinl! #2 - Julv 6, 2007 The County requested imposition of Operational eosts of$245.21, a civil fine in the amount of $5,000.00, together with fines in the amount of $96,500 for the period from July 10,2007 through January 18,2008 (193 days @ $500/day), for a total fine of $101,745.21. Total Amount Due: $149,719.65 The Investigator stated the County will abate the violations by demolition of the mobile Home and the abatement fees will be assessed 10 the Respondents. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines ami ruled thutfines will continue to accrue until abatement of the violations by the County. 20. Case # 2007070463 - Bee vs. Jill J. Weaver The County was represented by eollier County Code Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and Code Enforcement Investigator Thomas Keegan. The Respondent was not present. Violation(s): Ord. 05-44, Sec. ] I Weed overgrowth Violation address: 4620 Acadia Ln., Naples, FL 34112 The Special Magistrate again noted that "Para I" was incorrect, and amended the Agenda to remove this reference. Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated by the County. The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of$223.00, abatement costs of $250.00, a civil fine in the amount of$500.00, together with fines in the amount of $2,050.00 for the period from September 15,2007 through October 24,2007 (4] days @ $50/day), for a total fine of$3,023.00. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 23. Case # 2007060378 - BCC vs. Exante Fils-Aime & Noltine Alexandre The County was represented by Collier County eode Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and Code Enforcement Investigator Carmelo Gomez. The Respondents were not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-58, Sec. 7(2) 18 161 8.: 1 January 18,2008 Rental registration Violation address: 2821 47'h Terr SW., Naples, FL 34116 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had not been abated. '3 The eounty requested imposition of Operational eosts of$m.62, together with fines in the amount of$3, 150.00 for the period from September 15, 2007 through January 18,2008 (126 days @$25/day), for a total fine of$3,383.62. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. 24. ease # 2007060377 - BCC vs. Exante Fils-Aime & NoItine Alexandre The eounty was represented by Collier eounty eode Enforcement Supervisor Gary Dantini and Code Enforcement Investigator earmelo Gomez. The Respondents were not present. Violation(s): Ord. 04-41 as amended, Sec(s). 2.0 I.OO(A) & 4.05.03(A) Abandoned/lnoperable/Untagged vehicle Violation address: 2821 47'h Terr SW., Naples, FL 34116 Supervisor Dantini stated the violation had been abated. The County requested imposition of Operational Costs of $241.00, together with fines in the amount of $1,900.00 for the period from August II, 2007 through September 17, 2007 (38 days@$50/day), for a total fine of$2,141.00. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for the Imposition of Fines. VII. OLD BUSINESS - None VIII. CONSENT AGENDA - None IX. REPORTS: The Special Magistrate stated a Public Forum would be held on January 31, 2008 at 9:00AM in the BCC Chambers. The purpose of the Forum is to give the public an opportunity to learn more about how cases come before the Special Magistrate and the Hearing process. There will be mock hearings and the public is invited to participate. X. NEXT MEETING DATE - February 1, 2008 19 -----..-~----_._-"_..., " ]!~ 8anuaryt. 20~8 There being no further business for the good of the County, the Hearing was adjourned by Order of the Special Magistrate at 1 :55 PM. COLLIER COUNTY SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING -~JL ((1)~~ ......-; -- .special Magistrate, Brenda Garretson These Minutes were approved by the Special Magistrate on as presented , or as amended 7. ~. J-9v~ 20 16$}' -Bt;;.~ p . ' -", ~\\ J.["~ ..LI '\_1\ ~y tt. Fiala ..' Halas L/ ,'!::;.tl, Hennlng~- Coyle ~ - Coletta ---- LET IT BE NOWN, that the Clam Bay Committee of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board met in ~-:':O;.~i-; " CLAM BAY COMMITTEE MINUTES - December 19, 2007 Naples, Florida "CO', Regular Session on this date, December 19, 2007 at 10:00 A.M. at The Hammock Oak Center, 8962 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples, Florida 34108 with the following members present: Mr. John Domenie, Chairman Ms. Annette Alvarez (Absent) Mr. James Burke Dr. Ted Raia (Absent) Mrs. Mary Anne Womble ALSO PRESENT: One (1) member of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board; Mr. Gary McAlpin, Collier County Coastal Zone Management; Ms. Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Collier C09unty Attorney's Office; Mr. Tim Hall, Turrell, Hall Associates, Inc.; Mr. Jim Hoppensteadt, President, Pelican Bay Foundation; Ms. Janice Lamed, District Offices, LLC.; Mr. John Petty, Division Administrator, Pelican Bay Services Division; Mr. Kyle Lukasz, Field Operations Manager, Pelican Bay Services Division and Mrs. Barbara Smith, Recording Secretary AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of the November 21,2007 Meeting 3. Audience Participation 4. Review of Clam Bay Annual Report 5. PBS&J Report a. Analyze "Conclusions" - Pages 37/38 b. Consider "Recommendations" - Pages 38/39 5. Update on "Renewal Application or "Extension" of Management Plan 6. Status of additional Osprey Nest 7. Audience Comments 8. Adjourn ROLL CALL CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: We shall get started with the roll call. Mary Anne. MS. WOMBLE: Here CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Jim. Misc. Corres I (p I B 2- MR. BURKE: Here. Date: CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: John Domenie. Here. Item#: 565 Copies to' v C;::lam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 16/ 8 ("'"1,. " !:..,., Ted Raia I understand is out of town. And we haven't heard anything from Annette, have we? MS. SMITH: She did call and her employer is in town today and she will not be available. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Pardon me? MS. SMITH: Her employer, Mr. Forbes, is in town. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 21. 2007 MEETING CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: The first item is the approval of the minutes of November 21st, and I have some comments to make. Barbara Smith always does such a great job on our minutes so that ifs difficult for someone else to step in and take over temporarily. I would, however, like to commend Elizabeth Brooks of the Gregory Court Reporting Service for her minutes. It must be difficult to hear new names, abbreviations and listen to the off-the-cuff comments. I do have some corrections. In first place, Mr. Petty, is it required to mention what staff members were also present? The minutes merely reflect the four members of the committee that were here. MR. PETIY: Mr Chairman, it's not required, but it is good housekeeping though. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay. So let it reflect that Mr. John Petty and Mrs. Barbara Smith and _. MR. PETIY: Also, Mr. Kyle Lukasz was also present. Then on page 544, the middle of the page there is talk about fertilizer. And that I think should be 8-0-15 instead of what is written. And a little bit further down is that 8T12 correct, 8T, capital T? MR. PETIY: No. It should be 8-2-12. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: 8-2-12. Thank you. Then on page 547, that should read Turrell, T-u-r-r-e-I-l, not Terrell. Then I believe on pages 549, 550 and 551 where we have Mr. Bradinson, I think all those references are to Tom Cravens, C-r-a-v-e-n-s. Somebody may want to check up on that. MR. BURKE: I had a question also to Alberto Chavez. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Yes, what page? MR. BURKE: I'm sorry. The same page 550. He's Rookery Bay; is that right? CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: That's correct. Alberto Chavez is Rookery Bay. 566 Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 161 8 ,~ c. On page 551 Bob Naegele, N-a-e-g-e-I-e. And on page 555 I think that's a natural misunderstanding when we're talking about the sandbar. In this case we were talking about the Sandbar Restaurant with a capital S, Sandbar. On page 560 there are two references to Mr. Coleman. Mr. Coleman is present, but I believe that those should be Mr. Bauer, B-a-u-e-r. MR. CONNELL: If I could correct that. It's Mr. Connell, not Mr. Coleman. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Oh, is it? MR. CONNELL: Coleman is my first name. CHAIRMAN DOMEN1E: I'm sorry. It says Coleman in the minutes. That's why I -- okay. But you didn't say anything I don't think. MR. CONNELL: I don't recall. I don't believe I used my name. MS. WOMBLE: This is about -- Coleman, irs about apple snails. I don't think this was you. MR. BURKE: He's an old apple snail guy. MS. WOMBLE: But you're -- infamously it can go either way, Coleman or Connell. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: You're correct. It shouldn't be incorrect, Mr. Connell, but correct is Mr. Bauer. Thank you. And at the bottom of page 561 when I'm talking, I'm talking about the Inn at Pelican Bay not just Pelican Bay. And the other area is the Breakwater not the Greatwater. And 562 although "pest" with a "P" management is desirable, I believe we were talking about "best" with a "B", best management practices. And page 562 no doubt my poor enunciation caused a problem. It's capital PBS&J. But I think under the circumstances I feel these are very, very good minutes and I thank you very much for your work. And does anybody else have any other corrections? MR. BURKE: John, in the depth of your input on the minutes, does it have anything to do with the big print? CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I can read it. MR. BURKE: I found the same thing. Very good, yeah. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: You have anything? Anybody else? 567 1:1am Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 161 ~ .8, ~~\ .d' t-. MS. WOMBLE: No. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Do we have a motion? Mr. Burke moved, seconded by Mrs. Womble and unanimously approved the Minutes of the November 21, 2007 Meeting subject to the above referenced changes. -~~--~-~-- AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Now we go to audience participation. Do we have anybody from the audience? Please step up to the mic and identify yourself. MR. FINLAY: Yeah. Doug Finlay. And I live in the City of Naples. And I believe at the last Clam Bay meeting a question was asked as to what fertilizer the city was using, specifically mainly directed towards phosphates. And I do have that answer for you. I thought you might be interested in knowing. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Yes, please. MR. FINLAY: I know Joe Pistaglia (phonetic) who's in charge of these things in the city, so I sent him an e-mail and he wrote back and I'll just kind of quote from -- from his e-mail. (As read): Doug, last year and the previous years we used the following blends of fertilizers: Sod, 15-1-15 _ so that's 1 percent phosphorus -- ornamentals, 8-4-10; trees and palms, 8-4-10. This year we will be using the fOllowing fertilizer blends: Sod, 15-0-15 - so going to no phosphates on the sod - omamentals, 8-2-12, dropping from four; and trees and palms stay at 8-4-10. And then because we do have athletic fields, they use 0-0-50 and 0-0-20. For the dry season they utilize 18-0-18. So anyway that helped them figure and answer. Also the city is currently working on a fertilizer ordinance as we speak. We discussed it with council yesterday and it passed our committee, the CSAB last week. The Conservancy had some input, but they wanted a little bit more defined ordinance. So I believe we may be talking to Mike Bauer on that anyway. The City's looking at essentially a mandatory no phosphorus, slow release nitro ordinance that will be extended from not this -- what I just told you about is what the City puts on its own property but on the private property. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Very good. That sounds great. Mike, you have anything that you would like to add to that? 568 ~Iam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 16/ B ~ C MR. BAUER: Mike Bauer, Natural Resources Manager, City of Naples. I think Doug covered it all. We're looking at no phosphorus where phosphorus was not needed because our systems don't require phosphorus. Slow release nitrogen to get the mechanism releases. And organic fertilizer, we're recommending that process. And, of course, we're doing that, putting it into an ordinance and we're putting our landscape certification program into an ordinance that was established by resolution. Now we're putting it into an ordinance with penalties that are involved with fines if people do not comply. So we're putting some teeth into it. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Has that passed? MR. BAUER: No. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: - being -- that's January? MR. BAUER: January 9th will be the first reading before city council, with the second reading at the next city council meeting to give the public time to come and talk about it. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: To what extent under the present conditions has there been use, shall we say, people complied with the people, the landscapers? MR. BAUER: We've had a fantastic response. We had over 400 people go through the education program. And we now have over 70 companies that are certified by the city. And they have a little sticker on their trucks so we'll know they're certified. And so it's been a great success even without any teeth. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Well, congratulations. I think that's great, something for us to discuss. MR. BAUER: Great. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Incidentally on a separate note, I would like to say that the Mangrove Action Group is having its annual meeting on Saturday, January 26th, here at the community center at two o'clock. The Mangrove Action Group is of great assistance to us, encouraging best management practices and has invited Cathleen Fester, Urban Horticultural Agent and Master Gardener Advisor as their guest speaker. Please show your support by coming to this meeting and encouraging your friends and neighbors to come also. And this afternoon at two o'clock there is a meeting of the President's Council. I understand that Mr. Mike Bauer is going to be one of the speakers? MR. BAUER: I hadn't heard that. I've got to be at city council at 1 :30 so that's going to be tough. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I was told that you were going to be one of the speakers today as was Cathleen 569 1:1am Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 161 B '" '/ , ~_4 Fester and a third person MR. BAUER: Okay. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: That was according to Tom Cravens when I saw him yesterday. MR. BURKE: Who is Cathleen Fester? CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: She is an urban horticulture agent MR. BAUER: She does the Florida Yards & Neighborhoods Program. MR. BURKE: They had a President's Council meeting last Thursday. THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sony. I can't hear you. MR. BURKE: I'm sorry. There was a President's Meeting last Thursday at two o'clock. So maybe Tom Cravens has got his times confused. CHAIRMAN DOMEN1E: Okay. MR. BAUER: He was talking to me about January 9th and something going on. MR. BURKE: Yeah MR. BAUER: I mean, according to that, but I don't know about this aftemoon. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Well, perhaps he misspoke yesterday. Thanks. Thank you very much, Mike. Anybody else have anything? (No response.) REVIEW OF CLAM BAY ANNUAL REPORT CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Let's go on then to the next item, review of Clam Bay annual report. MR. HALL: Hi. Tim Hall with Turrell, Hall & Associates. I just wanted to provide you an update on the status of the Annual Report. I'll have it ready for the January meeting. I brought some of the water quality graphs. I know that's been kind of the main issue with Dr Tomasko's report and the discussions of the last few meetings. I thought I could provide you a preview of the nitrogen phosphorus levels and what we saw this year CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay. In the first place, Tim, thank you very much for this. Will the report itself be this size or is it going to be the small one again where you can't tell one color from the other? 570 Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 161 B j~ MR. HALL: No, I'm going to put a full page graph in the report. Okay. If you use the CD and bring it up on the computer screen it will be actually even clearer. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay. M R. HALL: What I included here was the nitrate and ortha-phosphorus levels that we had been monitoring. And the average monthly as it has every year, bounces all over the place especially with the phosphorus. The nitrate levels are pretty low in all of the Class II waters, all of the bay waters. You'll see where the big swings are in our Class III, the St. Lucia and the Pelican Bay 13 which is up towards the north end of the system where the highest levels of nitrates were recorded. But if you go to the last two sheets the average annual and especially for the phosphorus level, you'll see this year was kind of a downswing. Almost all of the stations had lower average phosphorus levels than they had last year. I know of particular interest to Mr. Domenie was that Upper Clam Bay Creek is in pretty significant decline this year. I don't know if thars a result of less going into the system or more a result of the fact that we are in a drought year and have had less rainfall to actually move material into it. Again, it's just something that we're going to have to keep an eye on. So we'll have to look to see what happens in the next couple of years whether those numbers jump back up again or not. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Now, where exactly is St. Lucia? It is not behind St. Lucia, is it, Kyle? MR. LUKASZ: It's close to that area, yes. St. Lucia is the one just north of the Commons. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Right. Irs north of the Commons. MR. LUKASZ: Yes. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Because there's very little water there. You're taking it east or west of the berm? MR. LUKASZ: West by that cut and by the weir structure. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Where the culvert is? MR. LUKASZ: Right, where the culvert is. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Well, doesn't that get influenced a lot by the culvert, because there's a canal there. MR. LUKASZ: Right, because you've got the weir structure coming across. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Right. Shouldn't you actually be taking that east? MR. LUKASZ: That's where I've been. 571 """ 16 "' B.=" .;.('.;)1 J: . ,.~~ ,>' I;.... Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 MR. HALL: They normally pull it in the water that's coming out. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Oh, okay, as long as they take it there Can you imagine why that area has such a high phosphate reading? MR. HALL: Well, I believe that's one of the main outfalls of System 3. And that's the biggest aerial water management system we have. So that's the one with of the outfalls going in. MR. PETTY: Let me ask you to define for the Board the nitrogen cycles so they understand the difference and the evolution of nitrogen and water between ammonia and nitrates. MR. HALL: Correct. MR. PETTY: So when you see these spikes in one particular nitrate level, you're looking at really a stage of the nitrogen. If you could walk them through that, Tim, I'd appreciate it. MR. HALL: Okay. Basically the nitrogen, as John said, is split into or contained in the system in three different compounds: nitrates, nitrites, ammonia. And, I mean, I'm not a water quality scientist so most of what I get I'm trying to remember is from my biology class. MR. PETTY: Sorry. MR. HALL: No, that's okay. MR. PETTY: I didn't mean to stick you with that. MR. HALL: That's fine. I can definitely with a little more research probably answer that question better. MR. PETTY: I only know it from the utility business MR. HALL: Okay. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: So what are we saying? MR. PETTY: You're trying to measure nitrogen. And nitrogen changes according to the biological activity. And we're trying to wait for it to get to its most stable form. When you see these spikes, you're not really seeing so much as new pollution, as you're looking at a possible change of retention. This water may be at the very end of the system. And the reason we measure it on one side of the berm and not the other is that's the very last bit of treatment that can happen. Impact is on the other side of the berm. CHAIRMAN DOMEN1E: Right. MR. PETTY: So by then we want any nitrogen to be as stable as possible by the biology available in the lake 572 Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 16' I 8 ,.." ~ and our uptake by any plant material and the like. So if you see the nitrogen in a young phase of treatment, well, now you're looking for a hydraulic problem because you haven't retained it in your system. And that gives us an indication that possibly the nitrogen that is causing this spike came from nearby if there isn't a hydraulic problem. So they're all just indicators when you're looking at the nitrogen cycle. I think as he said at the end, is the phosphorus levels are on decline this year overall in our system. MR. HALL: Yes. MR. PETTY: Although we see a spike in the May-June time frame at that St. Lucia location. I think overall for the year, though, we are down; right? MR. HALL: Yes. Overall for the year we're down in both of those. And the reason we measure - we actually measure in our water quality we have all of the nitrogen components. We have readings for nitrates, nitrites and ammonia as well as fertile nitrogen. We also have the ortha-phosphates and total phosphorus. The reason we're recording those is they've been most closely linked with the algal blooms and algal spikes. That's why we include these in the report, as well as the chlorophyll levels that we started to see. If we see spikes in one or two of these, then we look to see if we see corresponding spikes in the chlorophyll or the algae levels within the system and then kind of link those together. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: So we will have the full report by the next meeting? MR. HALL: Actually the full report will be to you right after the first of the year. I'm trying to give everybody between one and a half and two weeks to review it before the full board meeting. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Very good. Thank you very much. MR. BURKE: So the spike on the graph doesn't necessarily mean there's a pollution problem at that location? MR. HALL: Correct, yes. If it wasn't just a spike but if it was a rise and then a sustained high level across time that would be much more of an indicator that there's a problem. The fact that it's going up and down means that those natural processes are working or that the actual delivery to that point is intermittent. It's not a constant supply. The other thing that I wanted to mention was the sea grass, which was one of the other issues. We found this year that we actually have more aerial coverage of sea grass than we had last year though the density from 573 Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 ,.,. B 1 ~? 1'H~ where we had sea grass was a little bit lower. So last year we had smaller areas that were denser, whereas, this year we have larger areas that are a little more spread out. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Now, how did you do it, linear or random? MR. HALL: If I could comment on that. One of the questions that we had been asked was how many acres of sea grasses are in Clam Bay. That was never what the monitoring program that was set up for them was designed to answer. The permit which allowed the dredging when the original resource surveys were done prior to that located sea grass beds that were either in the pathway of or very close to the dredging footprint. So when the permit was issued, they asked us to set up transects, or the permit required transects to be set up to monitor those specific grass beds to see how they reacted to the dredging. It wasn't a system-wide survey. It was just to monitor specific areas that were identified at the time of the permit. So that's what our transect system was designed to do. When Dr. Tomasko did his sea grass thing, his methodology was to use a random point generator and look at different points within the system which also doesn't give you an acreage cover. It establishes a baseline and a means to look at changes or patterns that may develop over time. If you keep doing that same type of system, then it will give you general coverage of sea grass but not any specific increase survey. In order to actually determine your acreage, you have to do a very systematic transect survey. I think the best way is where you essentially swim every square inch of the bay and say here's where the grasses are. We actually did that this year to try to answer that question. We did find additional sea grass beds that we had not mapped before. We found a lot of Caleurpa which is an algae, macrophitic algae that looks similar to a couple of different sea grasses but it's an algae, not a true grass. The other thing that we found this year that we had not found in the past was a very substantial clam population. It looks like clams are starting to come back into the bay. There were several beds of them that we found throughout there. MR. BURKE: Mr. Chairman, I'm looking for the first permit for harvesting if thafs possible. MR. HALL: The other thing that you'll probably see when our report comes out is that Dr. Tomasko did his sea grass survey and the work that they did in May early in the year. They found Halophila, which is a little kind of two-leaved sea grass. When we did our survey it was in late July. We did not find any Halophila. We found all 574 Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 161 B 2. Halodule which actually looks like grass. We also found three different locations of Thallassia which is the manatee grass, the big thick-leaved grass. In one spot it was only five or six sprigs. In another one it was about a dozen. And in the third location it was four sprigs of it, but that is more than we have found in past years. So we're pretty happy that it looks like the extent of the sea grass areas have expanded this year. Again, that could be a result of the rainfall and less water coming into the bay which allows more to spread out and get established. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: You mean less fresh water and more sea water? MR HALL: Less fresh water, less fresh water inputs. I believe that was actually something that happened county wide. With my conversations with the Conservancy and with Rookery Bay, I think a lot of the sea grass surveys that were conducted this year have found more grasses than they had in the past. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Thank you very much. MR HALL: Okay. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Any questions? MR HALL: I guess I should mention the mangroves. They're still doing really well. MR BURKE: Are there any die-off areas right now, new ones? MR HALL: Nothing new. There's a couple of lightning-strike areas. And the last die-off area which was the one around the county boardwalk and a little more in the southern end of the system which was part of the old channel or canals that were closed off with Hurricane Charley. This is the third year now. Most of that stuff I think has died or what is going to die has died. We're starting to see some regrowth and some sprouts coming back. There will probably be a couple more years before we see any major difference in that area. MR PETTY: If I could, Mr. Chairman, ask a question. I'm going to try and summarize actually. What we've seen over the last eight years in bringing the mangroves back leads us to believe that attention by the residents or by this group in keeping the mangroves healthy is something that would be necessary each and every year into the future MR HALL: Yes. My opinion for sure is that the maintenance of the system and the work we've done is going to be a critical component of making sure that the system is able to recover and sustain itself. That is definitely one thing that we saw when we had the hurricanes and the storm surges associated with them. While they weren't extreme, there was a surge there. And the mangrove areas all drained and recovered very, very quickly which 575 Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 161 -r'B' I~ "} C prevented any more additional die-offs to occur. MR. PETTY: We've had to go back in and we do maintain these handcut channels should they get blocked. And if the pass gets blocked, that's part of our permit is to keep clear of that. I guess to summarize and make sure we all understand, it's a very delicate balance in our bay system. And that the difference of a couple of inches of water elevation means the difference between a healthy system and a stressed system. MR. HALL: Absolutely, yes. The water level is critical to maintaining IT. That is part of the monitoring every year. We're not just looking at whether the mangroves are healthy, but we also look at all of those flushing cuts and to make sure that they're not blocked and are still flowing and working like they are designed. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Well, to me the most amazing thing is when you walk along the berm and those seven canals that you dug leading into the berm to bring more salinity they brought so many seeds. And that whole area is just teeming with new 3-foot high mangroves and behind them are mangroves of 5 feet, 7 feet and 9 feet from the different years that I guess seeds came in. It's really fantastic. I can't believe how much those have grown. MR. HALL: I think that and the fact that the cattail growth has been curtailed quite a bit. Both of those are direct byproducts of that additional salt water. MR. BURKE: That's fine. Thanks. MS. WOMBLE: I saw that firsthand yesterday thanks to Mr. lukasz. So, absolutely ifs so much better than it was even five years ago. Doing great. CHAIRMAN DOMEN1E: Mr. lukasz, will you be deepening some of those canals that lead to the berm? don't know. It looks like one or two of them may have filled up a little bit. MR. lUKASZ: Well, we go through and check them. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: When do you do most of that work, in the dry season or the wet season? MR. LUKASZ: Usually March, April. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: The dry season. Okay. Thank you. Thank you very much, Tim. We look forward to the full report. PBS&J REPORT ANAL VZE "CONCLUSIONS' PAGES 37/38 MR. DOMEN1E: The next item on the agenda is the PBS&J report and analyzing the conclusions on pages 37 and 38. I will give my comments on that and then ask everybody else to join in also. 576 Glam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 ~ ~ T""8/1l11 ~ J!. r_~" 0 t!.. In reading the conclusions of the PBS&J report, please bear in mind that the first three referred to what the author refers to as the total Clam Bay watershed. All other references should read Outer Clam Bay only. The fact that it is a high salinity environment indicates there is great flushing. Then the author goes on to state (as read): Analysis of long-term data sets, 1981 through 1998, suggest that salinities decreased over that time period. Well, that of course is obvious since that was also the time that Clam Pass closed at various times and before the major dredging that took place in 1998. And I find it very strange that in all the author's work the time period 1998 to 2006 was omitted. If you recall the major dredging took place at that time and greatly increased salinity in the estuary. And then finally on page 38 (as read): A significant quantity of nitrogen, phosphorus and suspended solids appear to be coming from areas south of Seagate Drive. As these sub-basins have highly urbanized landscapes with little evidence of stormwater best management practices, actions that would increase the influence of these areas on water quality in Outer Clam Bay should be appropriately considered. Within the more immediate watershed of Outer Clam Bay, the stormwater treatment best management practices in place of the Pelican Bay sub-basin appear to result in significant reductions in loads of nitrogen, phosphorus and suspended solids. And then on page 37 the overall conclusion (as read): Combined these results lead to the conclusion that Outer Clam Bay does not appear to be a seriously distressed system. I just feel that should be part of our record. I know ifs in the report, but I feel that that should be part of our records. I don't know if anybody else wants to add anything to the conclusions. MR. BURKE: The conclusions of the report? CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Conclusions of the report, not the recommendations yet. MR. BURKE: Did you read conclusion and action plan? CHAIRMAN DOMEN1E: Yes MR. BURKE: Okay. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: The first part first part is the conclusion and then it goes into the action. MR. BURKE: Okay. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I have not touched on the action yet. MR. BURKE: Okay. Then perhaps I just make some comments. I mean, there is no doubt that, Mr. Domenie, you and I have done seven years on this committee and there's no doubt we could have been defined as 577 16/ ;) .",', /:} {. c:... Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 mangrove fanatics. I mean, that was the thrust of everything. I will say in past years, Mr. Domenie, you used to bring up water testing quite a bit, but there's no doubt that a great job has been done with the mangroves. They're healthy. The system is sound. To me what the Tomasko report has done is point out the need to keep a closer eye on the water quality. I mean, if I read through all of it, it's a lot about water. I think I'm about right there, aren't I? CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I would agree that it is all about water. I mean, he doesn't touch on the mangroves at all. Because I guess it was about sea grasses and how they're affected by the water quality. I guess that's what the aim of the study was. MR. BURKE: So I guess what my thoughts are, this Tomasko report and our management plan perhaps, is the impetus we need to maybe not turn this into water fanatics, but to start working at water about as thoroughly as we did the mangroves. That is my thinking on it. And I'm hoping that we use the conclusions and the recommendations in a constructive manner when we incorporate them into the plan which I'm sure we will. So that's about what I have. CHAIRMAN DaM EN IE: Mary Anne. MS. WOMBLE: Well, from attending the meeting where Mr. Tomasko gave his presentation and from listening to he and Mr. Gary McAlpin, who happens to be here, it becomes rather clear to me that absolutely water is the big issue. And at this point the water south of us is far more important. (Phone ringing.) MS. WOMBLE: I'm sorry. I have a new phone and I don't know how to turn it off. And I'd also think it's Mr. Bob Bittner. But from those comments that I'm re-reading here that I took from that, it occurs to me that we're all really concerned about the water issue in all of Clam Bay. And south of us seems to really be needing help. And I think that the, pardon the expression, grass-roots effort at this point is really important from everything I'm learning which is enormous from what I used to know from just a couple of years ago. I think that Mr. Tomasko's report was right on. I think Mr. McAlpin's got the idea and he's going forward for the southem end of Clam Bay. It's really important to get that up on target. I think that maybe it was a good thing that you were mangrove fanatics. MR. BURKE: Yes. Yes. MS. WOMBLE: Because it may have turned out for everyone's best interest, city, county and all the 578 ~Iam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 16'~r ~ 8~'" './ e:,. residents and all of the tourists that come in and enjoy our area and our environment. I have to say' really am thrilled that Pelican Bay, Westinghouse, and WC' have considered and been very environmentally concerned enough to keep the mangroves which did not happen all the way south. I'm sorry, it didn't -- there goes that phone again. But I appreciate all the efforts that are going on and I'm really thrilled to see it all happening. So thank all of you who are in this room from whatever area you're involved in. I know you're involved and you're really trying your best in whatever area you can. And I do thank all of you because this is an important issue and it's becoming more and more important as fertilizer is fi~ering into our systems from everywhere north of us, west of us, east of us. I'm figuring we'll get Europe sooner or later from the way things are going. So thank you. MR. BURKE: Mr. Chairman, one other comment comes to mind and Mrs. Womble caused me to think about it. When all of our emphasis was on the mangroves, we could be self-contained. I mean, it was us. It was our mangroves. We could get our arms around it. But in reading all this material and talking to people about the water, I think that's a broader issue in getting at it. And I don't think we can just be Pelican Bay because we obviously share the system with the City of Naples. We share it with other communities. So I think as we move into the future with our stewardship of the water, we're going to have to look at it in a bigger picture manner. For me this report has helped with that and also some of the other people that were brought into it with us. I'm looking forward to it. CONSIDER "RECOMMENDATIONS" - PAGES 38/39 CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Do you or, Mrs. Womble want to comment on the recommendations that are made in there? I have various, but I would like to hear from you two before I say something. MR. BURKE: Can' mention something about water? Have we already increased or added to our water testing points? Did I hear the number 16, that there are 16 additional sites? MR. PETTY: Mr. Chairman, if I could. What has come before the committee before and what they have opined on, we haven't yet passed it on the budget yet, is that we would reinstate the upstream water quality tests that we used to take in the old days. We used to take them at the head of the water at the first lake next to Tamiami Trail and then you take them midway in the system and then right at the berm. And of course you would take it in the bay system as well to find out what background is to see what your impacts were. It was felt that way if a problem existed 579 Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 1 i'!l:J" B .. . ~ by having at the head works and in the middle you would be able to isolate the cause quicker. After about ten years of doing that, we found that there was no concem of levels here and it was deleted for cost savings. Since the issue of water quality has come up, we find ourselves in the position where we are looking to adopt a little bit of a defensive posture and in an abundance of caution, lers go back to doing it. Even though we don't have an indication of a problem, let's go back to doing it because there is such a high level of concern of contaminants being dropped in a specific one-time event that this could give us good evidence. So the cost isn't that great. And we should be able to bear it. So staff recommended doing it and I believe this body voted to do it as well. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: And all of those locations are east of the berm ? MR. PETTY: Yes. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: - I think Tim was talking about it being west of the berm. MR. BURKE: Yes. Have we increased testing points in Outer Clam Bay? MR. PETTY: No, sir. We have indications from the county from Mr. McAlpin's office that that recommendation from the PBS&J report is something that they want to look at. They don't have a specific plan to date, but we've told them we'd be glad to work with them to the best of our ability once he does have that plan. The county and Mr. McAlpin have expressed an interest in possibly expanding the criteria. We look at it from, is there any contamination from our water management system. And I think Mr. McAlpin is looking at it as a health indication of the bay system itself. MR. BURKE: Entire system. MR. PETTY: Yes, sir. More than your stormwater system may be working perfectly fine. We're now going to use the Pelican Bay experiment, add to it, and start developing our own criteria for what a healthy bay system should and shouldn't be. Which as you may recall we talked about possibly doing the same thing with NOAA, who has a ten-year program to do the exact same parameter which is what is the determination of a healthy coastal zone. Well, Mr. McAlpin is the Coastal Zone Manager and I think he's looking to develop that. And I'm kind of proud that he picked Pelican Bay to start. MR. BURKE: Uh-huh. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Anything else? MS. WOMBLE: I understood that also and I'm thrilled. Thank you, Mr. McAlpin. 580 Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 16~' "'B'~''''.'''''' .. '":, '). . ; t" CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I have some questions. It says development of a county sponsored random station location. Do you know what he means with that? MR. PETTY: These are all works in progress. We had a meeting yesterday where we talked a little bit about how it would start and the primary concerns and talked with Mr. Leo Ochs about how it would be implemented. Ifs still very much a work in progress. We don't want to push Mr. McAlpin into having to do this overnight. This is something that you want to do with due diligence and care. He has some broad objectives and an aggressive program. I think his time frame is that over the next year or so is where we would go over these one at a time. MR. McALPIN: Potentially we're looking at developing a plan, implementation. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Gary, would you come up to the mic, please. Thank you. MR. McALPIN: For the record, Gary McAlpin, Coastal Zone Management. Yes. We're looking over approximately a one-year period of time coming up, looking at the recommendations maybe adding some, taking some off, and working with the Pelican Bay Services Division to define what we want to do and then an implementation plan. We're really in the really early stages of that right now and we want to make sure that we want to get it right. Thafs why we're spending some time and making sure that the proper support and nourishment for this plan is there. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Thank you. MR. McALPIN: Once we have a framework that we as a community can agree on and then I think we would talk to the appropriate organizations. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay. Thank you. I have a question. Mr. Hall, are the reports that you prepare, as well as the other two reports, available on the Intemet or not? MR. PETTY: Mr. Hall's reports are on the Internet year by year. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Oh, all three reports? MR. PETTY: Every annual report that has ever done is up there. MR. HALL: Yes, the entire thing goes on the Pelican Bay Services Division's website. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay. Thank you. Excuse my ignorance, what's QC? MR. PETTY: Quality - quality control. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Oh, quality. What's QA? 581 Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 , .... If " .1,:; r B ,'''' r' MR. PETTY: Questions and answers. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Oh, it is MR. PETTY: Or quality analysis I would assume if it was anything other than that. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Oh, okay. Quality analysis and quality control. MR. PETTY: I think that has to do with when you're taking your samples, that's always been done by staff. And as the test gets more complicated as you look at different items, there is a chain of custody style quality control criteria that you would adopt to make sure that the results were reliable. Some of the spikes that you may see in this result are based on just a bad sample graph or bad analysis. So you have to take that into consideration. As you go into more technical analysis, the lab will get more and more refined on how that must go and they're recommending that a quality control program be enhanced to cover that. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: The next question it says, As well as required data uploads into STORET, S-T-O-R-E-T. What is that? MR. PETTY: Mr. Hall can define it. You defined it to me because I asked him the same question. MR. HALL: Yes. STORET is a state water quality database where a lot of different agencies will upload their information so it becomes public. Mike, I'm not sure. I think some of it is only available to governmental agencies or private access, but a majority of it is also available publicly. MR. BAUER: It's pretty much available publicly, but it's extremely user unfriendly. You really have to actually get trained in how to get into and out of it. It's bad. MR. PETTY: I think the understanding was that this is a commonly checked referenced work for the scientific community. And as we have seen over the years, various people have come into Pelican Bay and have done their evaluations, written their reports with various angles of accuracy compared to our long-term view and sometimes we end up repeating ourselves. So maybe if we adopt a central database, maybe we can start referencing everybody to it and start getting this body of work into a central standard if you will. I don't know if that's possible because in Mr. Hall's industry they tend to argue a lot. STORET is what everybody's adopting so far for that Internet library, I guess, for storing data. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: On Item 3 of the recommendations I presume that's all aimed at Outer Clam Bay. Should we look at the other bays also? Mr. Hall, do you have any suggestions on that? 582 j"'''1r, ....,,~'-l!':::.. rr y Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 MR. HALL: Well, again, it depends on the type of survey, the type of work you would do, would be what you want your final product to be. If you want to know the sea grass coverage or the oyster coverage for the entire bay, you'd have to go out there and survey the entire system. If you want to know what the trends are over time, then you would do that random point generated survey that Dr. Tomasko had started in his report. And if you wanted to monitor just specific areas, then you do the transect survey that we do for the sea grass beds. It just depends on whether you're trying to monitor one specific habitat or general trends or actual numbers for the entire system. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Mr. Hall, as long as you're up there, how deep is Outer Clam Bay? What is the deepest that you have come across? MR. HALL: At high tide the deepest is probably six feet. At low tide it's about four feet. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay. That's the deepest, but average is, what, about two feet, three feet? MR. HALL: Average depends on the tide. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Right. MR. HALL: It's probably two and a half to three and a half feet. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay. Thank you. MR. PETTY: Barbara says she knows a fishing hole where it's 15 foot deep in between the two bays, but she's not telling us. MR. HALL: That's not in the bay though. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Then they say, Continued maintenance of monitoring of the stormwater best management practice system for Pelican Bay. We're doing that already. Then Item 6, Development of a public education program to increase awareness of those activities that can be done to minimize individual impacts on stormwater loading. We're doing that through both the Foundation and the Mangrove Action Group who are very much involved in that. Of course, we're also preparing the video and other information. I believe that Mr. Connell is thinking of some sort of an informational program for the Men's Coffee and perhaps for the Women's League. Am I right? MR. CONNELL: That's correct, yes. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: So I think that is all part of this information. I do have a question. Potential use of ditch blocks within swale systems. I mean, that is for very heavy rainfalls, isn't it? We have the lakes already. 583 Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 - 1(' , c:' B . , c. MR PETTY: A lot of these suggestions cover the very broad area of the study. We are not considering those as a specific recommendation to Pelican Bay at all. We think he's addressing the bigger area where they have direct discharge to the ocean without a water management system. Those types of things would probably hamper our system. So we're not taking it as anything that we should consider at this time. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: On Item 7, Careful consideration of all aspects of increasing flows into Clam Bay from urbanized area south of Seagate. Does he mean increasing or decreasing the flows or to analyze increased flows? MR PETTY: Again, this is basically outside of the Pelican Bayarea. It's in Venetian Bay and Moorings Bay. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Right, but how it affects Outer Clam Bay. I think what he's saying is we somehow monitor the waters entering Outer Clam Bay from the south. MR PETTY: Since the water quality is different from the Pelican Bay area to the Seagate area and south, he's bringing it up in the report that there is a drastic difference in analysis and you should keep that in mind. It is something that we do and that we have regularly monitored. Don't forget that, of course, we have a flushing action in there too. Historically, we haven't seen that either increase or decrease to any respective level. We don't go into Seagate to do analysis, per se, to show what's going on specifically inside. It's outside of our area. I think thafs what he's recommending that this is an area that the county or the city may have interest in monitoring in the future because there is such a difference in water quality between the two zones. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Finally, and this is a subject that I know has come up. I think this is a subject that has been discussed of the possibility of putting a draw bridge at Seagate so that people from Seagate could have direct access to the gulf without endangering any sea grasses or shallow bays. MR McALPIN: In my mind there's two things still that need to be done in terms of studies. And thafs some kind of a hydrologic study that talks about the interplay between Clam Pass and those pipes underneath Seagate. I don't think anybody has a really good handle on how that system is working now and maybe how it should work and that may be something thafs the city's responsibility if we had the money. And the other issue is what is the water quality in Moorings Bay, Venetian Bay and how is that affecting Outer Clam Bay because the Dr. Tomasko report was based on land uses and relating land use to water quality. We need some hard data what that water quality really is. 584 Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 1 tt'1 B ~ CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Well, I think Mr. Finlay stated earlier, at least in private, that data is available on water qualities in Moorings and Venetian Bay. MR. McALPIN: I don't think that it is acceptable data to the state STORET system. I think we have to do this under strict quality analysis and quality control procedures that are really acceptable to the scientific community. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Thank you. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I think earlier I also - go ahead, Doug. Identify yourself again, please. MR. FINLAY: Doug Finlay. I wanted to add to that because I am on the board of Save the Bays, which is a group of people that live on Moorings Bay. It's essentially founded to keep the pass open. Thafs all been taken care of by TDC funding and other things. Now Save the Bay is a little more focused on water quality in Moorings Bay. They have recently put out some clams and oysters and they're actually, at least the initial reports, are doing quite well. This is just a test in conjunction with FGCU. That's right, Mike? FGCU and Save the Bays on the clams? MR. BAUER: It's primarily FGCU. MR. FINLAY: Intems or whatever. But Save the Bays and the Conservancy do quarterly water testing. But like Mr. Bauer says, it's not really what he wants to have. Mr. Bauer wants something that can comply with state standards. It could be much more extensive. He wants monthly reports, probably more parameters. Basically a much more extensive water quality testing program. I happen to agree with that. I want more water testing done. We're trying to look at our taxing district, which I happen to be on the board of, to see if that taxing district might be able to supplement the cost. Since all municipalities are going through budgetary restraint issues with Tallahassee, perhaps a contribution from Save the Bays. They're already paying for some water testing. We could get a bigger contribution from them. So the only thing I can tell you is there are a group of people in the city who do want to see more water testing done in Moorings Bay to meet the parameters that we're doing to Naples Bay currently. It's a question of where do we find the money to get that done. And then like Mr. Bauer also said, we do have an exchange of water undemeath the culverts, but it's probably not a very heavy volume of an exchange. We just don't know. And it certainly would be nice to know what type of influence happens there. There are no stormwater outfalls in the City of Naples that enter into the Seagate area or into Clam Bay. We do have about 74 stormwater outfalls, some of which do dump into ponds into Moorings Bay. So anyway, that kind of helps explains things. 585 Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 161 n LJ "'\. .; C CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Thank you very much. Earlier, John, I think we discussed about trying to have Humiston & Moore make a study of the water flow through those culverts. MR. BURKE: Those were the flap gate culverts? MR. PETTY: Yes. We have past studies where we have gone out there to try and measure the flow, so we've got that history. But recent reports by people on-site and others that have gone out there have indicated that there may be additional choking in that canal where they talk about increased siltation. We know that there is some movement in there. Whether or not it's going up or down, I think is what we're talking about monitoring. Because we don't know how it changes over time. That's something, of course, that we would be in discussions with Mr. McAlpin about on those one-by-one characteristics as we go through this issue. I think that one of our future tasks is that over the next year we determine how that study occurs and what does it get tied to and who does it. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay. Anything else on the report? MR. BURKE: One of the versions that I remember from early on with this was a recommendation concerning the development of a random station location water quality monitoring program for Clam Bay with three to five stations visited monthly. Is that something completely new to us or are we doing something similar now. MR. PETTY: We are not doing a random test, per se. And the reason for the random tests would probably best be explained by someone out of the scientific community. Our tests are all based on the stormwater system and any deterious effects it may have on Clam Bay. So the random stationing may have more to do with moving life forms than it does with what we're looking at here with our water management facility. MR. BURKE: So it would be in addition to what we do? MR. PETTY: Yes. MR. BURKE: Okay. MR. PETTY: And that's part of that discussion we're going to be having. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: We actually have two locations in Outer Clam Bay right now that we're monitoring. One right at Seagate and one near the Foundation Park. MR. PETTY: That we take samples from for that nutrient loading - CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Yes. MR. PETTY: Yes, sir. 586 ,.:Y , '" 0 B'-e Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 MS. WOMBLE: Actually, I believe that Dr. Tomasko had made the comment that if you don't do random sampling, you can't really use the data. I don't know how accurate that is, but that was one of his comments. MR. PETTY: I think it's very similar to when an attorney gives you legal advice. If you agree with the advice, you take it. If you don't, you get another attorney. MS. WOMBLE: Or doctor. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Anything else on the PBS&J report? (No response.) UPDARE ON "RENEWAL APPLICATION" OR "EXTENSION" OF MANAGEMENT PLAN CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Now, the next item is an update on the renewal application or extension of the management plan. John, I don't know if you would like to get into that, please. MR. PETTY: That was part of our discussions yesterday with Mr. McAlpin and the rest of the county staff. We do have the permit being reviewed by the County Manager's Office and whoever he designates it to. Coastal Zone Management has been asked to take a look at it. Gary has already spoken about what is in genesis right now. We have talked about, well, do we just submit it to the agency and then any add-ons can happen six months, a year down the road because it should be a two-year process we understand. I think Mr. McAlpin prefers and I pretty much agree that you don't want to be sending a permit up there and then direct it differently with a change later on. There should be a common thought or objective in the permit itself. And the concern is if we add things to it at a later date, we're sending mixed signals. With that in mind, we're going to be discussing probably asking for an extension since the permit has been held up for a couple of months. We're supposed to have a two-year process and I think we're into that two-year time frame. So it is probable that during the first part of the year, January/February, staffs going to be coming back and asking for an extension. We've already had some preliminary talks with Turrell, Hall & Associates on that issue. Give the county a little a little bit more time if you would and then at the next meeting or two we'll come back with that recommendation on whether it should be an extension or whether we just go for the permit submittal, but we're asking for it in a month or two. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: But our present permit expires July 2008. Thafs six months from now. MR. PETTY: Yes 587 Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 16 , 1"" ,J ~J ,;;" C. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: How long can we operate without an extension in place I guess if it takes time to get an extension? MR. PETTY: I think the extension, while it's being reviewed would be granted anyway. We're not looking to default on the issue. And if there's any pressure in that regard, we will immediately bring it to your attention for consideration. But for right now it is probable that we'll come back to you in either January or February and we will ask for your permission to go for an extension. Whatever that time frame is will depend on Tim's discussions with the agencies and the need that we feel we're going to have to give the County the chance to come up with the right program. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Thank you. Mrs. Womble, do you have any questions? MR. WOMBLE: No. MR. BURKE: I'm all right. STATUS OF ADDITIONAL OSPREY NEST CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: The next subject then the status of an additional osprey nest. I was told that we couldn't do anything during the turtle season. So that's over. By the way, I walked past the existing nest. I think that there are new birds there, small birds because I heard loud peeping. MR. HALL: Yes, I believe so. MR. BURKE: Is this our fourth nesting? CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Oh, yes. Fourth year. They seem to build the nests up a little more each year. MR. HALL: Mr. Lukasz and I actually met with a contractor on Monday. MR. HALL: Showed the site and we're going to provide him with him the specifications. He's going to get a price back to Mr. Lukasz. The contractor would then be in charge of the Vehicle on The Beach Permit and the building permit and the other issues required from the county. We have all of the other authorization that are required. It is now just now a matter of local approvals and getting it put in place before turtle season starts again. CHAIRMAN DOMEN1E: Okay. Thank you. MR. BURKE: Mr. Domenie, I know you walk the beach a lot. But that osprey nest is a little bit of a tourist attraction especially those that are here for the first time. They're stopping and looking. And, of course, they're thinking it's an eagle. 588 .clam Bay .committee Meeting December 19, 2007 , L ,~ i B ~.. 10 C CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Do you want to put up a sign that says this is an osprey? MR. BURKE: If you put another nest up, the ospreys are territorial; correct? CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: That was my question. MR. PETTY: Let me jump in. They're not that bad. If you go down the old access to Marco Island, which is through Goodland, the southern access, you'll see up on the poles several of them so many feet apart. And they have five or so up there. I always thought why would you put these things next to a road where everybody tries to pull off and look up at the nest and their car gets taken out by the semis in the roadway. This is much nicer. You're on the beach. There's no trailer to come and wipe you out and you can spend all the time you want. MR. HALL: You can also see them along the 1-4 corridor going through the center of the state. You see them on almost every power pole along the road. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Also in Key West. MR. PETTY: They don't flock together, but if you keep the nests so many feet apart, you're okay. MR. BURKE: They built their own nest on the power poles? MR. HALL: Yes. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Thank you. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I just have two comments. You know these people that go to the beach, South Beach sandbar, how Clam Pass Park Beach has increased dramatically in size and the tip of it is nearly even with our Sandbar Beach. It really has grown dramatically. I don't know how or where that sand has come from, but it has grown. MR. PETTY: If we could find out who's responsible and tell them to keep it up, that would be nice. MR. BURKE: But we're not losing sand, are we? CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I think we have lost a little but, you know, it comes and goes. Some days you go down there and with high tide it's all the way high. At the moment some new sand seems to be forming in the shallow water. So I don't know where that is coming from either. I'm going to make a radical suggestion or question if I may. If you walk on the south boardwalk and you come to that open space and you're looking at acres of non-beach quality sand. Then I'm thinking we have two areas in Pelican Bay where our dunes could be broached or broken through in case of a major hurricane hilling us, one just south of Clam Pass Park and one more or less parallel with Inner Clam 589 Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19, 2007 161 B ~~ c. Bay. And I just looked at that and I said I know in the past in 1998 we pumped that type of sand along the beach. wondered if this is something that should be considered to strengthen the dunes with non-beach quality sand. And, secondly, if you dig a lot of that sand out of there, then would you get more flushing through the pass also? And, I mean, irs radical and requires approvals from 20 different people and I don't know who would pay for it, but it's just a question that I have. MR. PETlY: Mr. Chairman, it's a very valid question. It is one that I think all of us have said when we've looked at that point: Does that need to be cleaned out or is that the way iI's supposed to be? And all kinds of issues come up such as navigation which we've never said we're pro or con about. We're all about the health of the bay system. I have had prepared preliminary talks with Mr. McAlpin who brought this subject up in regard to the sand needs of the Clam Pass Park and dredging. And I talked about how far back can we go. Can you - how far back can you go to get beach quality sand? I said because some of that appears to be a choke point further back. And Gary was very good about saying, listen, if it needs to come out of there for the health of the bay system, don't worry about it. We'll find the right spot for it. And I think he is looking at things like the basin doing restoration in other such suitable areas where you would put that deposited material. We haven't looked at that area because it didn't really impact the large mangrove areas that we had the big concern over. As we talk with the County and look at this expanded consciousness and as Pelican Bay kind of warms up to the idea of going beyond mangroves to other flora and fauna of the bay system, I think we do start looking at things of that nature. So I know that the County has already considered such items and I'm excited that you've seen it too. And I'm sure we'll be talking about such things over the next year. MR. BURKE: Mr. Domenie, what was the second dune area that you mentioned? I knew the first one. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: I'm showing it right near Inner Clam Bay. And the other one is south of the Clam Pass Park. That Inner Clam Bay area, during one of the no-name storms water or sand drifted in about 150 feet with water and that's when we rEHlnforced it. We got permission to bring in sand to rEHlnforce the dunes, but this would be using that non-beach quality sand or soil. MR. PETlY: Which is appropriate for this location. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: Okay. Anybody else have any questions? 590 Clam Bay Committee Meeting December 19,2007 l~ r B ~. .'<i' c!- MR. BURKE: I'll second it. CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: All in favor? (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN DOMENIE: No discussion. Thank you very much everybody, .J.J..J.J.J. J.J There being no further business, the meeting was adjoumed by order of the Chainnan at 11:15 a.m. JOHN DOMENIE, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC., BY CAROLYN J, FORD, RPR, FPR, NOTARY PUBLIC. - FORMATTED BY BARBARA SMITH, PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION 591 'If ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 16 Print on pink pap}A~ ~~i~oc~~t~?~r~m~~~~~~?e~e~~ t~!!:~~~c;~~o~~?'~~~n~and original K 5 documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, andlor information needed. If the document is already complete with the exception of the Chairman's sianature; draw a line throng!: routin~ lines #1 through #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (Listinroutingorde.r) 1. tZo~ ~...( c../~o ;l.-;z..,,-o~ fZ-c..- 2. 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County eommissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of eourt' s Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Nonnally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional OJ' missing information. All original documents needing the Bee Chairman's signature arc to be delivered to the Bee office only after the BeC has acted to approve the item.) Name ofPrirnary Staff t<c6-vt"7 { , Phone Number >' <1 eo ""2- Contact , Agenda Date Item was 2 - -Z ~ -0 'if Agenda Item Number (, 1<5" Approved by the BCC Type of Document A-ffi'o;cw,'}- -t C.......,,~.p- Number of Original ~ fJ'<; tef,i" Attached Documents Attached " 01('0 1. INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/ A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a fO date. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.) All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's Office and all other arties exc t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a licable. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's si nature and initials are r uired. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip should be provided to Sue Pilson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! The document was approved by the BCC on ' (enter date) and all changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The Conn Attorne 's Office has reviewed the cban es, if a Ucable. ,,'^ .f-o cAo Yes (Initial) N/ A (Not A licable) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. r2"'Z-- r2-~ 12'l..- ,Q-z..... (2"Z. oz;.... 1: Forms! County Forms! Bee Forms! Original Documents Routing Slip wws Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 .. . _.....,,~......- '----_..~..._--_..,._.,~._--.,;--_._--~._,..-~ 16K5 MEMORANDUM Date: February 27,2008 To: Robert Zachary, Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Affidavit and Consent Enclosed please find one original of the document referenced above, Agenda Item #16K5, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. The Minutes andd Records Department has kept an original as part of the Board's permanent record. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-8411. Thank you. Enclosure J6 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) SS: COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX AFFIDAVIT AND ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION I, Paul C. Bauer, on this 5th day of February, 2008, after first being duly sworn, on oath state as follows: 1. I am over the age of 21 years, and if called to testify to the contents of this Affidavit, I am able and competent to do so. 2. I am currently licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, in good standing, and I represent Light Tower Wireless LLC. 3. My client, Light Tower Wireless LLC is the assignee of a lease originally executed by Acme Towers, Inc. and Collier County, Florida. 4. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge the following chain of assigrunents from Acme Towers, Inc. down to Light Tower Wireless LLC is true and correct: Land Lease Agreement dated as of April 13, 1999 between Collier County and Acme Towers, Inc., as evidenced by that certain Memorandum of Lease recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida on October 26, 1999, in Official Records Book 2605, Page 0106, with Acme Towers, Inc. assigning all of its assets, including the above-described lease, to Acme Tower Group, LLC pursuant to that certain Bill of Sale, Assigrunent and Assumption Agreement dated as of December 27, 2000, and with Acme Tower Group, LLC assigning all of its assets, including the above-described lease, to ClearS hot Communications, LLC pursuant to that certain Bill of Sale, Assigrunent and Assumption Agreement dated as of June 28, 2001. The membership interests in ClearShot Communications, LLC were assigned to National Grid Wireless Holdings, Inc. pursuant to that certain Assigrunent of Limited Liability Company Interests, Other Agreements and Acceptance of Assigrunent and Agreement to be Bound dated October 2, 2006. elearShot Communications, LLC was merged with and into National Grid Communications, Inc. pursuant to Articles of Merger filed with the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on November 2, 2006. National Grid Communications, Inc. was converted into Light Tower Wireless, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, evidenced by the filing of a Certificate of Conversion from a Page I of3 {Client File5\REA\306080\OOO 1 \F0451809.DOC; 1} corporation to a limited liability company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on August 14,2007. 16K5 5. I am submitting this Affidavit and Attorney Certification to induce Collier County, Florida, through its Board of County eommissioners, to execute certain consent agreements to facilitate loan transactions that Light Tower Wireless, LLC has heretofore made. FURmER YOUR AFfIANT SAYlW'NAUGHT:@c [], PAUL C. BAUER I, the undersigned Notary Public in and for the Commonwealth of Massachus tts, hereby certify that one PAUL C. BAUER, who is 'f.. personally known to me, or has produced the following identification , appeared before me this ~ day of j::e:On Y\ ~ ' 2008 and, after first been duly sworn on oath, acknowledged that he freely and vol arily affixed his signature to the above and foregoing Affidavit and Certification of Attorney. tf//fl /: tf6 ARY PUBLIC MMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Printed Name Commission Expires: * MEGHAN E O'NEIL NOTARY PUBLIC ~IIWEN.TH OF MASSACHUSETTS Y Commission Expires May 16, 2014 Page 2 of3 {Client Files\REA\306080\OOO 1 \F0451809.DOC;I} t, " ACCEPTANCE OF AFFIDAVIT AND eERTIFICA TION OF A HORNEY this 2.C:. day of ~ b ,2008. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLITY, F ORIDA . By TOM HENNING, eHAIRMAN ATTEST: DWIs:w;t;;~;~ROCK q~~R:0F.(f~TS " fl', '. furGll'" ~'~1k 4) 1.jJl1aturtQ<<1 ~ Appro~~d ~s to form and Legal sufficiency; ~ RobertN. Za y, Esq. Assistant County Attorney Page 3 of3 {Client FiJes\REA \306080\0001 \F045 1809 .DOC; I) M____ Bowditch &Dewey 16K5 !\1c~hiHI E. Q'Nl'i1 Din;c1Idl.'phonc: (50S) 416.2466 Direct fal.:simik: (SOl(l929-300] l:mall: ll\oncil((~'!b(nvditch.(;oll1 December 10.1007 VIA FACSIMILE NO. (239) 774-0225 David C. Weigel, Esquire County Altomey Collier County 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, S", Fl()(jr Naples, FL 34112 Re: PCS Site Agreement (the "Lease") by and between Collier County ("Landlord") and Acme Towers, 111(;. predecessor in interest of Light TO\vcr ,^!ireless LLC ("Tenant") for Certain Property ill Collier County. florida ("'Premises") Dear Altomey Weigel: ! am writing to you in your capacity as the owner of the Premises. We represent the Tenant with respect to the Lease. Paragraph 6 of the Lease provides that Tenant will not mortgage the Lease without the written consent of the Owner, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld 01' unreasonably delayed. The Tenant has entered into the following 1l1011gages: Leasehold MOl1gage from Light Towel' Wireless LLC to General Electric Capital Corporation dated August 15. 2007 and recorded in the Public Records in Collier County, FL on October I J, 1007 in Book 4191. Page 2677 and Leasehold Mortgage from Light Towel' Wireless LLC to General Electric Capital Corporation dated August 15,2007 and recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, FL on October II, 2007 in Book 4191, Page 1700 ("'Mortgages"). Pursuant to Section 6, at your earliest convenience, please acknowledge your consent by (I) executing thi.":J' letter below, and (2) returning tlte origina/tu me at the above address. If you have any questions, please contact me as soon as possible at (50S) 416-2466, or via email ut moneiI1{)bowditch.com. Thank you for yoor prompt attention to this matter. Sincercly, r ~. -l,'.oI"'{'; I,; ::'iJ~~f~;:n E. O'Neil f)ar~legal ;;/~ 0.. .-.-/<................... ~~?". ;,:;;,::,,' ,",;;.." ',.,,", ",'! ;i{.}.'j t': '.' j' J "I1~"r" , CR u Name: Tom Henning, CHAIRMAN Dalc:_.?.....2.<f,- CLK_ :Ctil'l1l Fik:j,ln,\Jfl()o~(r,(I(jOI',.'i1'\:f),\',] l'rn.I{'';'..j'O..J..t 117K[J()( ; 1) l? A COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: xxx Normal Legal Advertisement Other: (Display Adv., location, etc.) *********.***********************************************************************************.******* Originating Deptl Div: Comm.Dev .Serv ./Planning Person: Willie Brown, Alep ~ Date: 1 \).1..\ \ c"&: Petition No. (If none, give brief description): CU~2007~AR-12384. Enterprise Rental Car Petitioner: (Name & Address):Enterprise Leasing Company, D/B/A Enterprise Rent A Car, Jon Ellsworth, 4350 Fowler St., # 24, Ft Myers, FL 33901 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk!s Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) LH & D Properties LLC, 13560 Tamiami Trail N., Naples, FL 34110 Hearing before BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: Februarv 26. 2008 Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing. Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): XXX Naples Daily News Other Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: Petition: CUw2007-AR-12384. Enterprise Leasing Company d/b/a Enterprise Rentwa-Car, applicant and owner, is requesting a Conditional Use pursuant to LDC Section 2.04.03 for a rental car agency within the C-4 zoning district. The subject property is located 13560 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 8, Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? Yes 131-138326-649100 No It Yes. what account should be charged for advertising costs: Reviewed by: Approved by: ~ \.-f'h .~ /<p-/of Department Head Date ' County Manager Date List Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before Bee or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute tupies: County Manager agenda file: to Requesting Division Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. *************************************************************************.****.**.******..*******.*** FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received: ~ Date of Public hearing:~ Date Advertised: z../ Ie !ntO 17A RESOLUTION NO. 08-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONJNG APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABUSHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO AlLOW AN AUTOMOBILE RENTAL AGENCY IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-4) ZONING DISTRICT AT 13560 TAMlAMI TRAIL NORTH (SR 45), IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH. RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes. has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coor~inate and enforce zoning and such blLSiness regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004AI, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use for a automobile rental agency in the General COlmnercial (C-4) Zoning District, pursuant to Land Development Code Section 2.04,03, Table 2, on the property described in Exhibit "B", and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit nAn) that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 1O,OS.OQ,D of the Land Development Code, as amended; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that: Petition CU-2007-AR-12384, filed by Enterprise Leasing Company d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car, with respect to the property described in Exhibit "B," attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, is hereby approved for a Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.04.03, Table 2, of the Collier County Land Development Code in the General Commercial (C-4) Zoning District, for an automobile rental agency in accordance with the Conceptual Site Page 1 of2 17A Plan (Exhibit "C") and subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "D," attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resoiution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super-majority vote, this _ day of ,2008. ATTEST: D~GHTE.BROCK,CLERK BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COllIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: , Deputy Clerk JAMES COLETTA, Chairman Ap and ow ounty Attorney Exhibits (attached): A. B. C. D. Findings of Fact Legal Description Conceptual Site Plan Conditions of Approval Page 2 of2 17A BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007-AR-12384 The following facts are found: 1. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the oonditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same distlict or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes V/ No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress ygress YesL No_ C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: _ No affect or /~ffect mitigated by <text> l-.io.-J!, l (v\A.Q) <:cV'-yU , _Affect cannot be mitigated L OC- LCV\.Sv.~~-....... D. Compatibility with adjacent propelties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes v---No lr' /,"'. ~)CJ-I ~ (i'J-.- fJ v..t<7L Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATEd ,. n -Dr CHAIRMAN: EXHffilT A , ,. :,,111.J! I h 17 A ,. i!\' FINDING OF FACT BY' COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007-AR-12384 The following facts are found: 1. Section <text> of the Land Development eode authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: ^' Consistency with the Land Development eode and Growth Management Plan: Yes I No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes V No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: - No affect or / Affect mitigated by <text> _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: eompatible use within district Yes / No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: / //7 /!JJY ! / MEMBER:drl/lL, ';t-t'~ ~u EXHIBIT A 17 A FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007-AR-12384 The following facts are found: I. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. eonsistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yesl No_ B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yesi No e. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: A No affect or . _ Affect mitigated by <text> Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other ptoperty in the district: eompatible use within district Yes.L No_ If Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with ipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: iSBIv \'1 Zoo'i? MEMBER: .; \!,(7t,n .$(\j\~~ EXHIBIT A 17 A FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007-AR-123S4 The following facts are found: I. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development eode and Growth Management Plan: Yes t/ No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access ill case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes~ No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or ~ Affect mitigated by <text> _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes ~ No Based on the above fmdings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: 1- 11- (J f MEMBER: 7;?~ EXHIBIT A 17 A FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007-AR-12384 The following facts are found: I. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood . because of; A. eonsistency with the Lan1evelopment eode and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress / Yes -Y- No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: j - No affect or _ Affect mitigated by <text> jti~{tiJ'l'. _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. eompatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within disJt Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, wit stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: MEMBER: EXHIBIT A 17A FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007-AR-12384 The following facts are found: 1. Section <text> of the Land Development eode authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land7e <610pment eode and Growth Management Plan: Yes_ No_ B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: c. Adequate ingress & egres/: . Yes_ No Affects nej.ghboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effectV L No affect or _ Affect mitigated by <text> _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. eompatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within diS%' Yes_ No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. MEMBER: ~ DATE: / ~ /1 ..-- 0 Y EXHIBIT A FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR 17A CU-2007-AR-12384 The following facts are found: 1. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes /NO_ B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: C. Adequate ingress & egress /" YesL No_ Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: ~o affect or _ Affect mitigated by <text> _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district YesL No_ Based on the above frodings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: I~/?- oj' ~A&/;?r t/IC-.{ (cn-r" EXHIBIT A 17 A FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007-AR-12384 The following facts are found: 1. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood . because of: A. eonsistency with the Land Development eode and Growth Management Plan: Yes~ No_ B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of flIe or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes v/ No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: _ No affect or ~fect mitigated by <text> _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. eompatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: eompatible use within di7 Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: J } J'1 / 0 ~ f MEMBER:~~ EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION 17 A ENTERPRISE RENTAL CAR CU-2007-AR-12384 All T.hat par-t of Sec.tion 15, 'row:lship 48 South, Range 2:' East. Collie~ county, Florida, bainq more particul~rly de$cribed as follows: commencinq at the West 1/4 corner of ~aid Section 15: thence along the South line ot the Nor~hwest 1/4 ot said Section IS. Sout.h 89. 33' 40" East 14.59 feet to t.he E:asterly riq,ht- of~way lin@ of U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail); thence along aaid right-ot-way line and the West~rly line of that land as d~~crLbed in Official Records Book 1110, Page 1794. of the Public Rec.ords of Collier county, florida, tlart.h O. 37' 46' W~st :H~. '13 feet to ,the Point of Beqinning Q! t.he parcel herein described': thence continue along said 'line, North 0" 31' 466 West 1'33,24 teet; thence continue alonQ ~aid linel Northerly l04.a6 feet the arc of a circula.r curve concave to the \-l'est havinq radi:u5 of 3,919.12 feet 'artd being subtended by a chor:d bears North 1- 23' 4S~ West 104.86 teet; thence leaving said 1 in~1 South 89. 33' 40'" 'East 346.32 teet; thence SOlJth thence North Beg inning of along . which 0" 26' 2'0'" "lest 238.02 feetj e9# )3' 4.0. West 340.48 feet to th~ parcel herein describeQ. the Point of ExnffiIT "B" a;:;g w ~ I &-... ;Z'" W ~ I (J ~ . ... ,. [, .... I- [I UJ ~ ill - 011 a: ~ I.; z ...., ::lI 30 : (J) Q ". I , I , -' 17 A J~;;;'~'f~~ :"t; 11_ -'-" ....t~ ' ., . I I """"""""""''''m' 1$UJ!I~ 21illtitUUil ....=c..-co ~ ,\ JI\ '- > , d\ (-6\ a- I. l:r~ it.' ,r~ r~ L_._. ./ " ..._~-_._- ~-4' t9 ,l,....MH9lH 'Sn , , , " ! ~ IU " I - . ~ i llt1 M" r: ti . " Ii n Hi! ,,;t I 'I, .i ~ Iii I'" I,: h !~ i.H ~ r I t'il 'II' ! I, , i~1 . i( ~ uH J ! :: i,q !~ i, i 'I /, , U l.ll' iii; -fl, 'ml Ill( h Iy I Iii i (III l!1I! I It I l i ~ . ! II.! !! ! I h s r-'~ l,~ @--_. k: l~m~l H..r.i .~~ i ~l!d ~rl i 1-'- I [ . L ~ 1.(\ ,1~ 'l; ~ . a : i . l 3 I Oi . l, , II ~ ~ t~ ') .....; lL. ! ~ I ~" ...._--.J , I, Ii i ~R ~ , , ~ I I. , , , l. , , , . ! ! ~ , , 5 ~~' i~l . ~ r- ~ C:' ;> - gj..: Iii <C ::> u Q ....1 <( ..;-""t>- 00 Zgj N '" 0 N 0 - 00 ~g}gt- -<"'O~ I~OV1 r-ffiN~ o ..0 o o- N r 0" ~ z .& tJ UWO:::O i EXHlBIT "c" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Enterprise Rental Car CU CU-2007-AR-12384 Conditions: 1. Within 180 days of the date of approval of this conditional use, landscaping as depicted on the originally approved February. 1999 Landscaping Plan. prepared by Phoenix Planning & Engineering Inc., for the Phoenix Center, shall be installed to meet the minimum approved standards of this plan. and shall be inspected for compliance by Collier County. Should a permit be required to install said landscaping or to install or repair any irrigation, said permit shall be obtained prior to installation or repair. EXIDBIT "D" 17 A 17A , . January 29,2008 Attn: Legals Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: CU-2007-AR-12384, Enterprise Rental Car Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved, to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk P.O.lAccount # 131-138326-649100 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 1., A - Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed resolution is as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW AN AUTOMOBILE RENTAL AGENCY IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-4) ZONING DISTRICT AT 13560 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH (SR 45), IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Petition CU-2007-AR-12384, Enterprise Leasing Company d/b/a Enterprise Rent-a-Car, applicant and owner, is requesting a Conditional Use pursuant to LDC Section 2.04.03 for a rental car agency within the C-4 zoning district. The subject site is located 13560 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 8, Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding; you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Building W, Naples, Florida 34112, (239) 252-8380. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the County Commissioners' Office. 17 A BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -eountyof Collier I._- CLERK OF THE CIR., CUJT COURT COLLIER COUNTY q;OURT,OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI 'f,R.^IL EAST P.O. BOt 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA 'r~ to 1-30f4 ... . 17 A Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds January 29, 2008 Enterprise Leasing Company, DIBI A Enterprise Rent A Car J on Ellsworth 4350 Fowler St., # 24 Ft. Myers, FL 33901 Re: Petition CU-2007-AR-12384, Enterprise Rental Car Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK G2:U.JJCl PO[tL~ ~C Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone-(239) 732-2646 Web site- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierc1erk(Q)c1erk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts '.eounty of Collier t. CLERK OF THE CIRCUJT COURT COLLIER COUNTY <tOURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAM11(R,AIL EAST P.O. BOt 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA 'r~ 1 0 1-30~4 *. 17 A Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds January 29,2008 LH & D Properties LLC 13560 Tamiami Trail N. Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition CU-2007-AR-12384, Enterprise Rental Car Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~~\L Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone-(239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email- collierclerklalc1erk.collier.fl.us 17A Teresa L. Polaski To: Subject: legals@naplesnews.com GU-2007-AR-12384, Enterprise Rental Car Attachments: CU-2007 -AR-12384.doc; CU-2007-AR-12384.doc Legals, Please advertise the following on Sunday, February 10, 2008. Thank you ~ ~ CU-2007-AR-12384 CU-2007-AR-12384 .doc (28 KB) .doc (28 KB) Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners Minutes and Records Department 239-252-8411 (T eresa.Po las ki@collierclerk.com) 1 Teresa L. Polaski 17A From: Sent: To: Subject: postmaster@collierclerk.com Wednesday, January 30,20089:25 AM Teresa L. Polaski Delivery Status Notification (Relay) Attachments: ATT475856.txt; CU-2007-AR-12384, Enterprise Rental Car 1':..:1 ~ r;-.;:l L:..J ATT475856.txt (231 B) CU-2007-AR-12384 , Enterprise R.. This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. legals@naplesnews.com 'IIAPLES DAILY NEWS Publislied Daih Naples, FL 141112 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned they sen'e as the authority. personally appeared Phil Lewis, who on oath says that they serve as the Editor of the Naples Daily, a daity newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed III Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the :ldvcl1ising. being a PUBLIC NOTICE in the mattcr of PUBLIC NOTICE was published III said newspapcr 1 time in the issue on, February] 0'" 2008 Affianlll1l1her say's that the said Naples Daily :'\ews is a nev.'spaper published at ~aples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said n..~\I'srarer has h~rctor()re h.::cn continuously published in said Collier Ctlll11l\ l'lor-ida. dislrihuh:d in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, cad, day and has hc..::n cnlen::d as s~'cond dass mail mal1cr at the post olli,:c in ~apks. III said Collier County. Florida, for a period of I \car Il,cxl prc.:cding 111," firsl publicatil)Jl o[thc attached copy or a,h"cl1iscl11cnl: and afliant 1llrth"r says that he has Tl~ither paid nOf prollli~..:J all;' p':J~Oll. firm or l:orporatioll allY disl:\JUlll. r.:hat..:. cUl11mission 01" r.:llmd f~lf Ih.: pllrpOS~ oj" securing this ad\"l,::ttis~l1I~nt l~)f p" "on~n the ~'"P''I''' _ , ,', <-l/k- ( Slgnat ure of a flan!) Sworn to and subscribed before me This lOth.200S Day of Fcbruarv 20118 ,_L/j ~~ (Signatuiotnotary p#lic) // ~~ /!/A:r.~:f~~:l ?.~. .:.,g ~:r.. ,.,so:: "'~,iil.:r,,~" NANCY EVANS Commission DD 657030 Expires July 18, 2011 ~Th!1,jTmvF~lnlnllUraocealXl.385-7019 CU.;IOOZ,All-l1lll4 NOTICE Of PUBLIC ,1iEAJItNG', I Notice Is herebY' given I that the Board of COunty Commissioners of' Col- lIercountx wlll-liold II ~tHlC he~on Tues- th~ 1:~o,",~~~ Floor, Admlnlstra,tlon Building. Com,r County GovernmentC:enter. 3301 East Tamlaml TI'IJI. Naples. Flortda. The meetlngwllJ.;,bagln at 9:00 A.M~ 1'ht- title of the proposed, resolution I, . as follows: A- RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING AP. PEALS OF COLllEA ~p~nrFcf~"':: llSHMENT OF A CONDI- T10NALoUSE -m AUQ.W AN AUTOMOBILE RENT- Al AGENCV ll(lfo4l-~- ERAl COMMERCfAl (C- 4) ~ONINQ DlmlCT AT 13560 TAMIAMl 'TJtAIL NORTH (SR 45l,IN,SEC- TION 15. TOWNSIllP48 SOUTH, MANGE 2S EAST, COlliER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ' . PetltlonCU.2007-AR- : I~~mm/~:! lerp'rlse ,Ren t.a.earl' ap-, plltant l!Ild _..... B.UtI"" . 'COJIdIt onol s:~tfo~f~or,:f'rD: rentalcat' ~,wlthin -4 "lUll ,.1,. 1"I<!<Il!-1 ~~~ SUI.1t mJ~~~J= 151 'TOw~ 4tI South. C.~i mlnlstrator prior, to pre- sentation of tat agenda Item to be Ii ressed. Individual spq r$ will be 'limited 005" minutes on any -Ite:m. The selec- tion of an Individual ,to ~~~~~':or lr:'e~Og~ nlzed b~ the Chair, a spokes'Peu~n for a ~y~o~jn!~~ ut6s to speak OM'an Item. 17A persons_ wIshing to have written :or graphiC ,m:t=E' 'hl1i\~ aU )n4$l' 'frt,lt said material a , knUm of 3 flor :0' the re- [,"I.t lithe . 'I In " case, written ma. t.r~, , Intended to be ,;.co " d b the :'lfhal,', be su~mltt~ the, approprflte County " ,,:",1'0 Staff a rnttrIImum of sev- '" d~tlor ,to the f:..'lNined'l'rf''':l'.i:: tlons before the Board wlH become a perm.. nentpart of the record. Any persori Wh'o.'l:tecld! es to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceed- Ings ptrtalnlng,thereto and.ttUHe'or-e.,. m.y need to ensure 'that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made. which record Includes the fe$tlmony and evl- deMe 'UfOft ',Which the appei.11S: baled; If y'ou are a person with a dlsabHlty who needs any accommodation In order to participate li't this oroceedlng; you are .elttltledj; at no cost to you, to the ptQvlilon of certain Bulst.nce.. Ple.se contliltt-the Col- lier County Facllltle$ Manageme.nt Depart" ment, ,lo~ated at 3301 Tartrl.,.,l .'frall East, BuUttlflO W, Naples, ~, Ida "',112, (239)1 ' . is sted Hst , d's. rthehear Imoa:! ' ~-V. avail ,e I~, .the, ','My Coml1'llS. $t9ners~, ~ ceo !SOARD OF COUNTY CGMMISSlONERS C::OU.IER COUNTY,; FlORlDA . TOM HENNING, CHAIR- ~GHT E:'ll]feC'~, CLERK , " ' " ~:cTee::- Pol~;"DeP. (SIAL) , .' Feb~ 10 No. 1685104 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Oftice only after the Board has taken action on the item.) ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exce tion of the Chairman's si ature, draw a line throll h routin lines # I thrall h #4, com Jete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5). Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date (List in routin order l?A 1. t06 J.~.O,( 2. 3. 4. 5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners 6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION (The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending Bee approval. Normal1y the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the executive summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above, including Sue Filson, need to contact statffor additional or missing information. All original documents needing lhe Bee Chairman's signature arc to be delivered to the Bee office only after the Bee has acted to approve the item.) Name of Primary Slaff Willie Brown Phone Number 213-2993 Contact Agenda Date Item was 2/26/08 Agenda Item Number 17A Approved bv the BCC Type of Do cum en 1 Resolution VB At \" Number of Original I Attached Documents Attached INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is a ro riate. 1. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documen1s to be signed by the Chairman, wilh 1he exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Altorney. This includes signa1ure pages from ordinances, resolutions, etc. signed by the County Altorney's Office and signature pages from contracts, agreem~/lts, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl State Officials.) 2. All handwritte'n strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the Coun1y Attorney's X Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and 1he Clerk 10 the Board 3. The Chairman's signa1ure line dale has been enlered as the dale ofBCC approval of the X document or the final ne otiated contract date whichever is a Iicable. 4. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's X si ature and initials are re uired. 5. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip X should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours of BCC approval. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee wi1hin a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of our deadlines! 6. The document was approved by the BCC on 2/26/08 (enter date) and all X changes made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The Coun Attorue's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a Ucable. I: Forms! County Forms! Bee Formsl Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Origina19.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05 MEMORANDUM Date: March 4, 2008 To: Willie Brown, Principal Planner Zoning and Land Development From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Resolution 2008-45 Enclosed please find one copy of the document as referenced above (Agenda Item #17 A), adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. If you should have any questions, please call 252-8411. Thank you. Enclosure 17 A l? A RESOLUTION NO. 08-~ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE EST ABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW AN AUTOMOBILE RENTAL AGENCY IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-4) ZONING DISTRICT AT 13560 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH (SR 45), IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant there10 has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use for a automobile rental agency in the General Commercial (C-4) Zoning District, pursuant to Land Development Code Section 2.04.03, Table 2, on the property described in Exhibit "B", and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A") that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section I 0.08.00.D of the Land Development Code, as amended; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been gIven opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that: Petition CU-2007-AR-12384, filed by Enterprise Leasing Company d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car, with respect to the property described in Exhibit "B," attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, is hereby approved for a Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.04.03, Table 2, of the Collier County Land Development Code in the General Commercial (C-4) Zoning District, for an automobile rental agency in accordance with the Conceptual Site Page I of2 l?A Plan (Exhibit "C") and subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "D," attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super-majority vote, this ~~-I4day of Jihr-u.a(y ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGl-Il\,E~~CK, CLERK ~~~~1~ AU.t;;,., "~.-,',"- 1 Deputy Clerk S 19f14ii;/:J~';dcl'I~'" ,.... { BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER !u:y, ORillA. By: :.If;- TOM HENNING, Chairman A roved as to form an leg] fficiency: Jef y . Klatzkow Chi s istant County Attorney Exhibits (attached): A. B. C. D. Findings of Fact Legal Description Conceptual Site Plan Conditions of Approval Ilem# /1fl Agenda -z.lzlvlr'b Date ~, Page 2 of 2 17 A BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007-AR-12384 The following facts are found: I, Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes V No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress 8s- egress YesL No_ C, Affects neighboring properties in rela1ion to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: _ No affect or j// Affect mitigated by <text> lJo..J, l cYu,,)<:CI".yL-r , _Affect ca1illot be mitigated L oC-- (c;.'I.~L.c~ca"- D. Compatibility with adjacent propelties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes v/No lr-'I 1'-'" ~),J-I'^') 1~'fJ'c"r- Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. , _ ill DATEd - I) -Or CHAIRMAN {/~L} ~2;, EXHIBIT A 17A FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007-AR-12384 The following facts are found: 1. Sec1ion <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes I No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes II' No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: _ No affect or ; Affect mitigated by <text> _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district / Yes V No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: / /17 J(}f' I I MEMBER:))~r1/1.d--, '2-tl'i &hthU 17A FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007-AR-12384 The following facts are found: 1. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will no1 adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same distric1 or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes.x.. No_ B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed struc1ures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes K No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: -A- No affect or _ Affect mitigated by <text> Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district YesL No j Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with ipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: (SBIv \l~OO'i? MEMBER: '6l?bn 5(~\\1-~"R- I \\ \ 1 ?A FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2007-AR-12384 The following facts are found: I. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes v' No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adeqnate ingress & egress Yes V No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or ~ Affect mitigated by <text> Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes V No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: 1- 17- Cl f MEMBER: 72~ FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR l?A CU-2007-AR-12384 The following facts are found: 1. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Lanievelopment Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress / Yes..i.- No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: J No affect or _ Affect mitigated by <text> J~~J&.,(llN'- _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within di7t Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, wi stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: MEMBER: FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR 17A CU-2007-AR-I2384 The following facts are found: 1. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land7e elopmen1 Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: C. Adequate ingress & egres~ Yes No Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects;,-/ / No affect or Affect mitigated by <text> - - _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within diS/: Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: / ~ /1---- 0 r >1/--1, /J MEMBER' / iL----J /' FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR l?A CU-2007-AR-12384 The following facts are found: 1. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes /NO B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress YesL~o_ C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: ~o affect or _ Affect mi1igated by <text> _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district; Compatible use within district YesL No_ Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: /-/7- c>.r- ~AC-Rr V I C--.{ I eFT-I-,' FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR 17A CU-2007-AR-12384 The following facts are found: 1. Section <text> of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: yes.JL. No_ B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes yJ No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or ~fect mitigated by <text> _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within di7 Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval <text>. DATE: 1 J J1 J ~ ~ . MEMBER: '-:::1 ~ ....... LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENTERPRISE RENTAL CAR CU-2007-AR-12384 All that part ot Section l~, Town~htp 48 South, ~ange 2~ East. Collier County. florida. being more particularly de5Cribed as follows: COlMl.encinlJ at thl!! West 1/4 corner of ~aicl Section l~: thence along th~ South line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 15. South 89' )3' 40~ East 14. $9 teet to tlul Easterly right- of-way line of U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail); thence alonq ~aid .rlgh.t-of-way line and the Westerly line or that land a!l dea~ribed In Official Records Book 1110. Page 1194. ot the Public Record~ of Collier County, florida, Nott.n O. 31' 46" West 33~.13 teet to the Point of BeqinninQ ot ~~e parcel herein deserib~d: thence contin:;e along said 1 tne, North O' 31' 46~ West 113.24 hat; thence COr1tjnu& alonQ .said Hlte. Northerly 104.86 teet t~~ arc of a circular curve con~ve to the West havinq radi::u:I of 3.91'.12 feet "and being 3ubtended by ~ chord be.ars North 1- 23' 45. West 104.86 teet; thence leavinQ 5aid 1 ine, South 81J. JJ' 40" East J1l6.32 teet; thence Sout.h thence North Beq i.nn1n9 of a1009 . which O. 26. 20. West 238.02 teet; 89- 3)' 40. We"t 340.48 teet. to the parcel herein de5cribed. the Point of EXHIBIT "B" 17 A 17 A ,I,~ D~-------,:;I _......, -......-.--...::;- r-Tl_' , ! \ ' , 1 i,(-1~- ' '~II' il'- 'ill' ' .. . , -,-- .U1! " 1 J .;:=t:."'~l~.q [ ; .....--... [J]" .. ~ _._ ~~'_I 01_ , ..... ---~I.W.~WNn~- Q:.: , . i.l I~ ~ III o - IX III I- Z III (J .... ~ l::! i Im~ .J~ .il I~ I t" 1 I "\ .11 ~-{\ ':. \ '~\ ,,~ ;; ;;10.: tii -< ;::> u 0 ,..J -< ..,.f--.... ooZ", ~~g - .. a:~gr-- <."O~ ,~Oll") r--o...N__ O~ ..0 ~til~~ I f-.~ u ;>Zf::'" Ub.:Ic..C ; '. " -- --" , 1 ~ ~ l.rli,l~ 1 l' ! 'I' ! ,.", 1_1l1_ _ ~ PI' li ilii ~ ~r ~~~~ Ii ,hi ,'" II' "" , nil '. ! . if ilill li!' I Iii 11Hl I !i.lI!! J hi , ' f~. .. t ",' ,II \'" ~ H ~ (II. U f I II 11 n ~q 1& if ~ i;!i Iii! I alii I I. . I ' l ~'~11 ! i I . r~~ '~ ~_. I ;~~~.. . IT 'I i H ~. ~lR I Ii g i, h i " ;eJ ~~ I ~ ~ II . d ~ " , , ' ~ ~ 's i a \:.- . ! I Ii . , i, L ' , , I J2 t I , I:.. :' I ! t --LL..-- , I 11 . EXHIBIT "c" 'i) =, 'I CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Enterprise Rental Car CU CU-2007-AR-12384 Conditions: 1. The existing landscape buffering to the rear (east) of the subject site, shall be brought up to current LDC standards for a Type B Buffer where deficient. 2. The days of operation shall be limited to Monday through Saturday. The daily hours of operation shall be limi1ed from 7:30a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The term "operation" includes the on-premises washing and in1erior vacuuming of the rental vehicles associated with this vehicle rental conditional use. 3. Any changes to 1he building's outside appearance, including but not limited to paint colors, trim colors, and signage, shall be architecturally unified for the entire building and site. All changes shall be consistent with the County's architectural guidelines and site design requirements. 4. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this conditional use approval, or major changes to the approved plan, shall require the submittal of a new conditional use application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Chapter 10.02.03, Site Development Plan (SDP) review and approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 04-41, as amended. 5. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the conceptual she plan, identified as "Sunrise Center Conditional Use Conceptual Site Plan," prepared by Phoenix Planning & Engineering, Inc., dated June 28, 1999. The site plan noted is conceptual in nature for conditional use approval. The final design must be in compliance wi1h all applicable federal, state and county laws and regulations. The Department of Zoning and Land Development Review Director may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by this conditional use, so long as these minor changes remain consistent with all applicable developmen1 standards. 6. There shall be no amplified sound of any kind or nature emitted from the premises. This res1riction includes but is not limited to vehicle radios and portable radios. EXHIBIT D COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA , REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS (i) 170 To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: ~ Normallegat Advertisemen1 (Display Adv., location, etc.) o Other: ********************************************************************************************************** Originating Deptl Div: Engineering Services, Community Development & Environmental Services Person: Stephen Higgins Date: 1/31/2008 Petition No, (If none, give brief description): A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Peti1ioner: (Name & Address): La Playa Golf Club, LLC 116 Viking Way, Naples, Florida 34110 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separa1e sheet) Jim Carr, Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc. 7400 Tamiami Trail North, Naples, Florida 34108 Hearing before X BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: (Based on advertisement appearing 20 days before hearing) February 26, 2008 Newspaper(s) 10 be used: (Complete only if important): ~ Naples Daily News o 01her o Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: See Resolution Companion peti1ion(s), ifany & proposed hearing date: nla Does Peti1ion Fee include advertising cost? 0 Yes ~ No If Yes, wha1 accoun1 shoutd be charged for advertising costs: 131-138327-649100 .' County Engineer -=3 i JAV oP-- Date List Attachments: Executive Summary -Copy Resolution with exhibits - Copy DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one coy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: o County Manager agenda file: to Clerk's Office o Requesting Division o Original 8. 01her hearings: Ini1iating Division head 10 approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. *********************************************************************************************************** FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE 9,Nk v,:',..,W Date Received: ~ Date of Public hearing: 2-/ 2lt.?~ Dale Advertised: dMOb + 7-/t+/Cb RESOLUTION NO. 08-_ 178 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PETITION AVESMT-2006-AR-10754, DISCLAIMING, RENOUNCING AND VACATING THE COUNTY'S AND THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN A 25 FOOT WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER THE SOUTH AND EAST 25 FEET OF THE NORTH % OF THE NORTHWEST Y. OF THE NORTHWEST Y. OF THE SOUTHWEST Y. OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, ORIGINALLY CREATED AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 2693 PAGES 3215 AND 3216, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND NOW FURTHER DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 'A', AND ACCEPTING A REPLACEMENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT, ALSO SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 'A', IN PLACE OF THE VACATED EASEMENT. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 125.01 and 125.37, Florida Statutes, Petitioner, La Playa Golf Club, LLC, has requested the vacation of a 25 foot wide drainage easement over the south and east 25 feet of the north % of the northwest y., of the northwest y., of the southwest y., of Section 24, Township 48 South, Range 25 East having been originally created and recorded in the Official Record Book 2693 pages 3215 and 3216 of the Public Records Collier County, Florida, and depicted in Exhibit 'A'; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with, and as part of Petitioner's request, Petitioner has offered for dedication an alternate 20 foot wide drainage easement as a replacement easement, attached hereto and also depicted in Exhibit 'A', in place of the vacated easement; and WHEREAS, the Board has this day held a public hearing to consider the Petitioner's request, and notice of said public hearing to vacate was given as required by law; and WHEREAS, the granting of the Petitioner's request will not adversely affect the ownership or right of convenient access of the property owners; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the County's interest in the 25 foot drainage easement as specifically described in Exhibit 'A' is hereby vacated, extinguished, renounced and disclaimed, and this action is declared to be in the Public's interest and for the Public's benefit. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County hereby accepts the dedication of the replacement drainage easement attached hereto and shown on Exhibit 'A'. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Clerk to the Board is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same, this day of , 2008. DATE: ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficie ''(3)>< lD~' (') "C m ....rren ....~->3: ~"-l-<-1 ",N-<)>l ....0 '" _0 G')O 001 00 .......0 ,...Q) ~ -n:i> o 3:;:0 00 .......~ o :::0 Z.... -101 m.... Z >;:0 Zm C1< moo '" o c m .... - to - o ClO Yj ~ ~ " .~ ~ i.i. \1!iI m " 0 ~ R ," :rtl c' m D ~ 0 Q "1 " ~ N . " ~ Ui' " '" ~ '" '" l'i!J d 0 It;; .: i~ ... . :~ ~ '" ~ io '" ...; ~ ~ i:!l i:!l o 0 Z Z '" ... I ... '" I '" ... I 0 '" I " 0 co I ~ ~g ~ r;l~ '" ""'0 Iii ~ ~'" ~ ~i 10: iliJi ... ... '" ",0 - oZ .... -'" o (3P:' ~ ...z . ",0 -~ iil !;; ~ o 011 2! lD ~o ~ 50' DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND UTILITY EASEMENT 1 I I 1 I 1---1 -1COfTIf') Os;;!~Ol m~l""I"'T1 ", ",0 <p..,)1T10 >OJZ-I C1~-10 ,... ,..;;0 r;l"O"'~ o>-aZ "",> rr1::o~ "'0 ",. -;0 ",. 17.8- CYPRESS WAY -- (NOO1lB'3B"W) (330.42') -ltofTIN O~>Ol lD"'~'" ", ",0 <l'JfTlO >O':lZ-l nlO-Io >.!A,..;;o M-U(/l~ o>"'l)z "",> 1"'1::o~ f:39 -;0 ",. ~ ~ 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I (~ I (-- j C5fJ ) I / _Jj J Ii ~_...--------~ 1 1 1 I I I I I I I L'1iI --t------;; ~------ z I ]oriel m I ;\!P' u1 j g~ ~ 1 :'8 "\ 1 ~u... ~'\ e I j;~ \2; 1 ~)~ en ''1 i~ en I ~~. t" I tlJ~ .5 I ~g -1- ..~,II1f----- I I 1 I I I I I I I I -----1 I I 1 -0 I (fJ 0 Z ;:0 I 0 I 0 " 0 -0 I C :;:0 0 1 ---1---1 ---1 (f) II I fT1 :E[11 0 ~ [11z'-...., N (fJON 0 ---1:;:0 ~---10 0 '-....,I" ;:0 -J>..:E )> [11---1 Z O(fJI )> "---1[11 G) fT1 (fJ~Z fT1 [11"-...,0 O-J>..:;:O )> ---1 ---1 (f) fT1 OOI ;;:: z":E fT1 -1[11 Z N I(fJ -l -J>.. [11---1 I ~ -J>.. '-...., CXJ -J>.. I N ()l ........ ~m >< :x: OJ ~=i cB @ @ \i @ 'I \ I ;0;0 f--- ~~~ I ~JT1 I ",> I ~~ I L____________ 1 .....L__ 1 I I L___________L_________________________~- I 1 (SOO'05'3B"E) (330.BB') I M:~,D,li:SQil:q1 :!i:llS!lJ!'A!lJ!'!t~ -~PLAni60K32~p-AGES 22 & 2~ 1-' -, I I I @ 15' ORAINAGE ANO ---LANOSCAPE EASEMENT 178"~ .~ '" '" ~ ~ '" u; - (5 (f)() 0'" "())> 0 z z co "I Oor 0 ")> COZ rrl rrr co - C "'0 '--'" '" rr - IZ 0-," I I -< OZ rrl)> :ErrlI '" "0 0- rrlO ., - '"~ '" (f)"')> 0 :u rrlr I I (f)- ,"Z Z'" .. ()-i 0 0 ~CO OI 0" rrl ..., 0 )> 00 '" 0 0)> "'rrl C)> (f) Z'" rrl<:;: '"'" Z'" 0 I )> Ir '" ;:: )>co )>. ~-< '"'" n nE; (f) rrrl (f)'" .-< " ~ ~~~..-_.".. -'-'~""""-'-"~'-'" rrl'" (f)'" 0 :::! ~~ ~ ;::(j) ,"!O " " 0 :::=Zh>'-"- r '" !;2z rrl(f) _0 O(f) Z '" Zo .......0 " '" ZO '"C "'rrl 0 "''' -0 "'" rrl (f))> ..." 0," " ~ '" rrlCO )>'" O~ )>- ",n "'''' 0 " '" >'" (f)C Zrrl "'" COZ ;0 '" tIlt;; Z 0" rrl 0 I<: "0 '"0 -'" " '" ~::J r)> ",rrl I" Z... 0 Z )>01 rrlrrl rrl G). .... "'0 (f)'" '" (f) Zz Zrrl ;::'" rrl .... Z '"0 (f)I 0 .., Orrl 00 '" 0 rrl- "'" 0 ;;J'" :u ",Z 0 C ;o:E 0 I<: (f)() ,"r ,"Z rrlZ ;0 O~ Y' -)> IO (f) ~ - I<:n ;:: )> Oz ~~ "I ~ Z Zo )>- Z ~~ 0 (f) (f)I ;0" )> .... ... 0;:: '" :::!... 01 '" 0 ...." <D r "a ~....... OOl rrl )> C ~~ 0 Z '" .......'" rrl '" ;orrl ... r(f) ~ 0 )>0 )> rrl O~ (f) "'''' (f) 00 ",C rrl '1<: 0;0 " r," C -<.I ;:: '" '" "'r '" rrl Z (f)I .... < Orrl ~rrl 0", Z rrl (f) rrl)> '" -< .'-? Oz (f)z 0 (f)0 Sl0 '" (f) rrl'" [jjrrl 0'" ,"I rrl", -:E O(j) Orrl Z(f) )>rrl ",'" (f))> (f) ="'~ .'" ....... ... (f),"," rrlII orrlrrl =1Z[Tl 00)> Z",(f) ",,"," ...I", - - :E (j) 0 fi" ~ '"tI ......... ~ - --l[rio rrl ~ 0 (f) g CII E! CJ ......... " 0'"0 n It ;- ......... ~ ~~" 0 "c tII ......... .... '" '~~~....~ 0 (f).......rrl " o ~ g... .., I",rrl :::! - '" 0 ~o~. ~ l;'l '" "0 ~g':1:; ~ Z '" ~"~ Z "',,~" c::: tI:l 0 n 0 ~.g'sz 1>:1 t:: ::J'1:l ~ CXl:tO ~" 0'" (f)rrl," 00 c: Egg t::' :;d zo", "tl o I 0.... ;J > PI' n",~[::l ~ CZrrl "';0 t:l g'~' C') '"0 ",)> ftg~~ O~rn~ Z ~I:::o (/) "'- E- "'n <DZ ....":= 0 ,"0 .' . ;oIC "')> o;~[ g ~ gj ~ ~~ >-3 .01 )>:E'" rrl ~'6. . q ZrrlI " !; ~ n", " > G)~tv 0rrl o~" 0 )> ~":;' '" ~ ~1il t"" rrl (j) "'(f) r:tJ N,O "'rrl ..~~ - ~...~[tl ""l c::: ~;:: =~~ g (j)...0 "'rrl . co '" ~ '0 Co "'- n fTlo'l ~z l:~~ . ;:l"'''''1:l t"" < )>,,'" '" ~ .." 00~::J c::: trl (f) '" ........ lo i!l~ 0 :-l--l-f '" " z t:l:l ><: IO 0 . -'" > "'0 0"'''' ~:: 0 co . ~ ",I<:.., t"" '" ~;'i " "' "- '" t"" O(f)," ~ 0 " 0 ~~ rOI < ""~~"'Il '" Q. - n CCI"Tl 0 ~ '" ",," )> :J: H g ~ 0" 0 ""- ... '" ;oIZ )> m n.. 11 '" :Eo '" 'iH:iiE 0 " 0 0"';0 '" ~::j ClClIII:ICl '" '" '" '" O(f)," 0 "'........- 0 ~ '" C'"I r-> 1~!3; 0 '" '" z~ I I 1 I > '".......I ~==~ '" ~-< .Jlo. ~ .... dl......c.II "'0'" - "'''' -0 "- "- r."o '" ore.> ~ C '" ~ ." "'N 0 "' ":'l:::o "'- '<ii' :E .D' 0 -, " :J ~ - - :>> ""'" .. t:l ~ ..., 178 This Instrument prepared by: G. Helen Athan, Esq. Grant, Frtdkln. Pearson, Athan & Crown, P.A. 5551 R1dgewood Drive, Sulle 501 Naples, FL 34108 239-514-1000 A VESMT -2006-AR.1A107N~EN~~~~2 LAPLAYA GOLF M FACILITY Project: 2005040080 DUE: 1/9/08 Date: 12/21/07 Project: PARCEL: Folio No.: DRAINAGE EASEMENT , ~ ~ASEMENT, made and entered into this ~ day of , 2007, by LAPLAYA GOLF CLUB, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, whose mailing address is 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL 34105, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor"), to COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiaml Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112 (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"). (Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" Include all' the parties to this instrument and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as the context requires.) WIT N E SSE T H: Grantor, for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and sells unto the Grantee, a perpetual, exclusive drainage easement to enter upon and to Install and maintain drainage structures and facilities, including but not limited to underground pipes, and various types of water control structures under, upon and across the following described lands located in Collier County, Florida, to wit: See attached Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein by reference. Subject to easements, restrictions, and reservations of record. THIS IS NOT HOMESTEAD PROPERTY TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee together with the right to enter upon said land and to place and/or excavate materials for the purpose of 178 constructing, operating, and maintaining drainage facilities thereon. The easement granted herein shall constitute an easement running with the land and shall burden the lands described above. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Grantor, for itself and its successors and/or assigns, does hereby reserve the right to use said easement area for the following purposes: (a) drainage of storm water from land owned by Grantor, which land is adjacent to said easement area, and (b) a water management berm, back yard swales and landscaping. Grantor acknowledges that it shall install root barriers for any plants within 10 feet of any pipes in said easement area and that Grantor shall be liable for and replace any improvements which Grantor has placed in said easement area and which may be damaged by the Grantee in exercising its rights hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. WITNESSES: LAPLAYA GOLF CLUB, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company THE HALSTATT PARTNERSHIP, a Florida General Partnership, as Managing Member By: Katherine G. Sproul and Jennifer S. Sullivan, as Trustees of the JULIET C. SPROUL TRUST under the Will of BARRON COLLIER, JR., Deceased, and as confirmed by change of Trustees dated January 1, 2002 and filed March 5, 2002, In Official Records Book 2992, Page 2016 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, PARTNER C1~ U~wv CAROLYNA. SHAW Print Name of Witness ~d -:t3,uL<T?'-.' 3' 1'\) KCl.:\"L 7'''0,(:''\'\0,-7 Zd-v Print Name of Witness O~()4ft~ CAROLYN A. SHAW Print Nal"e o~ess " ~C/ v...--'(b.-~1-, s,'-/'1) ~Gl-k ~,)(lo.i1I() Z'..d-u Print Name of Witness 17B~ STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF COLLIER) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I::z. 'If, day of M ~ 2007, by Katherine G. Sproul, as Trustee of the Juliet C. Sproul Trust under the Will of Barron Collier, Jr., Deceased, and as confirmed by change of Trustees dated January 1, 2002 and filed March 5, 2002, in O.R. Book 2992, Page 2016 of the P.R. of Collier County, Florida, as a general partner of Halslatl Partnership, as a Managing Member of LaPlaya Golf Club, LLC, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. ~i<.~ Notary Public SUSAN L. MATURO Print Name: My Commission Expires: I () - '7 ~ 0 8 ~~ SuNnLMoturo . ~ . My Comrr'llSllOl"l 00343818 ""I ....,<.. EIl;Qires0d0ber15.2008 STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF COLLIER) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / ;.. ye.. day of IJ.R ~ 2007, by Jennifer S. Sullivan, as Trustee of the Juliet C. Sproul Trust under the Will of Barron Collier, Jr., Deceased, and as confirmed by change of Trustees dated January 1, 2002 and filed March 5, 2002, in O.R. Book 2992, Page 2016 of the P.R. of Collier County, Florida, as a general partner of Halslatl Partnership, as a Managing Member of LaPlaya Golf Club, LLC, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification.' - ~ 'lllufivtJJ Notary Public SUSAN L. MATURO Print Name: My Commission Expires: {{J ~ 15 -0 8 ~~ SwalL-.. \, ~/' My CommoaIIOn 0ll343e1G or ro; Expirea October 1 15. 2001 (]~a,AtUr' CAROLYNA. SHAW Print Name of Witness Zr;\~~:'~ln~, :!rV Print Name of Witness STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF COLLIER) -fl.- The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /~ day of ~ 2007, by Paul J. Marinelli, Chief Executive Officer of The Halslall Partnership, as a Managing Member of LaPlaya Golf Club, LLC, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. - - 4't.~ N~tary Public SUSAN L MATURO Print Name: . My Commission Expires; l 0 -I '5"-0 B ~~ SuaorlLMoIuro . ~ . My COI1lfI'16ssaon 00343818 '\" Of"./ Expires Qctobef 15.2008 --,-~-~,--,----,-----,-_._._._-----'-'-~..~----_.._----....- 17a 1Z8 Q~r-Atg<W/ LAPLAYA GOLF CLUB, LLC, a Delaware limited liability mpany CARO~YNA, SHAW Print Name of Witness / -;) " ff",Q , /~~ , ,'J? 1-< '7.-A',) " ~ K.a.:~,(~-t>; s r" +v; 1.- n ) Print Name of Witness By: " STATE OF FL COUNTY OF Qiw"ld.) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this !7-..,.c.day of ~ 2007, by Stephen J. Lockwood, as a Managing Member of LaPlaya Golf Club, LLC, ~ho is personally known to me or who has produced as i~ rf? ~ Notary Public ~ Print Name: ~USAN L. MATURO My Commission Expires: /0-/5 -o<a '-"~ SuHo L MolufO . ~ . My CommmlOl'l 00343816 \.~...J ExpicesQclober15.2008 LAPLAYA GOLF CLUB, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company {]~ (to ~w- By: Stephen J. Lockwood & Company LLC As A Managing Me r CARO~YNA. SHAW _ '"tfB~~~~A J :V"lli\:,(l' -N Print Name of Witness STATE OF fL ) COUNTY OF '"....wE1/... ) .,t. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of ~ 2007, by Stephen J. Lockwood, as Managing Member of Stephen J. Lockwood & Company LLC, as a Managing Member of LaPlaya Golf Club, LLC, who Is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. ~t.~ ,....~ SU....lMoluro ,'1.1' My Com"*,,,," OO".3lI1O lSI f\i Expna 0cI0ber 15. 2008 Notary Public Print Name: SUSAN L. MATURO My Commission Expires: 10-15-08 ~,_._._.._--_.~..._----~. Acceptance by Grantee: ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK. ClerK By: Deputy ClerK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER aOUNTY. FLORIDA TOM HENNING. CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: By: J ight As i tant County Attorney 178 ~ !~ -<~ ~I plil lii~ ~i r o (') ~ - o z luST' lll~l _...:..':... 17 B 3O\!ACRE:GOollU:T1tIlllPUIl ~" , il'! " , " , I' " !' , ' !" "' i.,!, 1._, , ~I " o c z ., -< _ L ~I'" i"!I!,L,~\ lii?,i "." ~ ~ ~It~ ~"I"" ~ :;; -'- '^" ~ ~~ I ill r! l' !il ~ .....____1< i" · ,I' -I [lj! , "' i , ! , ~ ~ AIR.PORT_PULLINGROAlJ (C_R ~1) ~ii "-, i' ll~ < IPI.!i.! i! , ,I ' !I! II -! i . -I! !'ft " I U , 3: l> -C O~O>lN01S!l,,^,l I' i' II ,~ "' a~ II .Iii ~ "II "I if " "' I, 5~ 00 :!:iL -m 00 z., il 'II! "I"! , " - , ,N1EF<5TA1E.l& i" -u CWIlESS\\OQlS (:QI.F~~Il'lYCl..UB lNTERSTATE.l~ II ", ""Wl1I<GmH , " " i' " 0' '::1~ ," -I I ! , ! , " " '"0 ;;00 a b", ,. ~[;; a . II I --I. / NOTTOS<:1.l.E .r ~. ;-<;:'; ~~ CD w~ . ~ n p no~~ ~~ ZO~ O~~ OZ~ ~~ ". .... ~ . ~ 8~ z~ o. 0' ~ . ~ en - -l ~ . rr1 ~ ~ z . z 3: 00 ~~ l> " . QP -C Cc ~w , ~ . ~ ~ " ~ . r . ~ 0 z ~ ~ c z ~ n c- D < ~ 0 . n c 0 w . 0 ~ ~ 0'" < ^ ~ ~ . ~::j 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ om ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ z Z 0 ~ ~ --~.,---"-----"--- ~I =1 ~.... Pd liim ~~ .., ,. e ,. .... .. ~ r- o n l> -f - o z 178~ (~, S'fl 1ffl1W~! .21 I'RA'lKBOOl.EVN\D " ! , ! r "' "' " o c z --; -< ~ l> -0 !II 2~-< b ~ 0" 0" ~2 Om z'1 II -!l! " -< IJ .- . !l '~I INTERSTATE .1~ i !I , I , ! .p i ~ '"' <I i ... ~ '" ! '! , --I.. / - ~Or TO SCAlE !!! -" ~~i " INTERSTATE _ 7~ C_ESSWO/XlSGQl.FIlCOUNTRTQ.lIB HUN~NGI"" I h.. ,. ~::l ~ -~ " II I' <. , ~ " c' '1 "I .' " "i:: ~~ CQ w~ > ~ p < . , o~ 0, z~ O' O~ ~ . ~ <' .z ZO O~ ~~ w OC Oz z, O~ O~ ~ en - -f <, ITI ~. z, "' ~. z-< .. ~ z 00 l> ~~ . -0 QP Co "W , ~ > ~ ~ L ~ F 0 > 0 I ~ C Z < ~ 0 z ~ 0 -< Z I 0 ~ 0 w . C -< , " < 0 ~ 0 " . ~ 0 ~ 0 i;; ~ i;; ~ i;; 0 z 0 ~ ~ i;; 0 000 ~=i Om z l?B AVESMT-2006-AR-10754 REV: 2 LAPLAYA GOLF MAINTENANCE FACILITY Project: 2005040080 Date: 12/21/07 DUE: 1/9/08 /l.;oo "'0"'1\<"" REYI[';gO LIST OF ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS Falcon Ridge Neighborhood Association Inc. PO Box 11 0207 Naples, FL 34108 Mr. Angelo Lucarelli Ms. Gail Lucarelli 400 Euclid Drive Naples, FL 34110 Sawgrass of Naples Residents Association Inc. 2338lmmokalee Road #137 Naples, FL 34110 Kes Ramsay 277 Sawgrass Court Naples, FL 34110 Ms. Kathleen J. Thurston 273 Sawgrass ~O"C-I Naples, FL 3411 0 Mr. Edwin G1asberg 269 Sawgrass Court Naples, FL 34110 Koco Shkurti Aksinja Shkurti 265 Sawgrass Court Naples, FL 34110 Joseph R. Luteran Karen L. Luteran 261 Sawgrass Court Naples, FL341 10 LA PLAYA GOLF MAINTENANCE FACILITY l?B LIST OF ABUTTING AND OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE PROPOSED VACATION 1. Epifanio, Joseph R 16 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 32383001008 2. Riddle, Dennis A & Sheryl A 18 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 32383000986 3. Escobar, Braulio & Adiela 20 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 32383000960 4. Short, Everett C & Donna J 22 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 32383000944 5. Tennent Sf., Andrew & Mary 24 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34lto Folio No. 32383000928 6, Kerekes, Vandoran & Robin L. 26 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34lto Folio No. 32383000902 7. Joyce, Thomas R & Audrey F 28 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 32383000889 8. Rice, Robert D & Joann 30 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 32383000863 9. Marrelli, Eraldo & Rosaria 32 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 32383000847 139 Marwood Place Maple, Ontario L6A I - C4, Canada 17. 18. 19. 10. Raymond, Chester M & JWle 34 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Folio No, 32383000821 17r 11. lvY-A<" 12-0.N\1',I::. t \C.rz.IST'j,JA ~P.N'I\\(ovA '2.1 M~I>\ so~ OIZ-. ~f)(ple~ h. 3411O-1'3Z.z... fe-lIt <\..lv. 5"-' '318Soc.-z.o'4- 12. Pirrone, Elizabeth R & Angelo 25 Madison Drive Naples, FL 341to Folio No. 56318500]81 13. Peterson, David W & Donna M 29 Madison Drive Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 56318500165 14. Biancaniello, Mino & Silvana 33 Madison Drive Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 56318500149 15. Mahoney, Sean 34 Madison Drive Naples, FL 341 ] 0 Folio No. 56318500288 16. Gentry, Norman & Kamila 30 Madison Drive Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 56318500262 St. John, Sandra Jean 26 Madison Drive Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 56318500246 Di Longo, George 22 Madison Drive Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 56318500220 Zanetti et ux, Foster 221 Cypress Way Unittol Naples, FL 34110 Folio No, 72130040007 69 Beechwood Road Oradell, NJ 07649 20. Kasischke Tr, Carolyn M, Placke Jr., William H & Beth 221 Cypress Way Unit 102 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 72130080009 27536 Big Bend Road Bonita Springs, FL 34134 178 21. Arblaster, Earl Edgar 221 Cypress Way Unit 103 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 72130120008 39 Green Briar Road Alliston, Ontario L9R 1 ~ R6, Canada 22. Brubaker, Elizabeth 221 Cypress Way Unit to4 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No, 72130160000 9764 Connecticut Street Bonita Springs, FL 34135 23. Gray, Theodore M 221 Cypress Way Unit to5 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 72130200009 1981 North Star Road Columbus, OH 43212 24. Bayer, William A 221 Cypress Way Unit 106 Naples, FL 3411 0 Folio No. 72130240001 48 Purnell Place Manchester, CT 06040 25. Dublino Tr, George & Dub1ino, Marilyn 221 Cypress Way Unit to7 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 72130280003 9400 Gulf Shore Drive Naples, FL 34108 26. Wiles, G Christopher 221 Cypress Way Unit 108 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 72130320002 27, Reed, Carol A l?B 221 Cypress Way Unit 201 Naples, FL 341to Folio No. 72130360004 28. Baggs, A R 22] Cypress Way Unit 202 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 72130400003 29. Moulds, Clifford & Mabel 221 Cypress Way Unit 203 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 72130440005 30. Putnam, Karlene K 221 Cypress Way Unit 204 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 72130480007 1] 21 Gulf Shore Boulevard North Naples, FL 34102 31. Reed, Phyllis A 221 Cypress Way Unit 205 Naples, FL 34 I to Folio No. 72130520006 32. Dunckley, Thomas W & Salley J 221 Cypress Way Unit 206 Naples, FL 341 to Folio No. 72130560008 33, Johnson, Nancy J 221 Cypress Way Unit 207 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 72130600007 34. Pontiac National Bk Tr 221 Cypress Way Unit 208 Naples, FL 34] 10 Folio No. 72130640009 408 Carol Court Pontiac, IL 61764 35. Hicks, Troy Lee & Corene 178 'J> 333 Cypress Way Unit 101 Naples, FL 341 10 Folio No. 25030040002 39 Hawthorne Road Rolla, MO 6540 I 36. Roettele, Thomas P & Carol 333 Cypress Way Unit 102 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 25030080004 37. Bryant Est, Una Rose Keybank National Association Pr 333 Cypress Way Unit 103 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 25030120003 4194 East Normandy Park Drive Medina, OH 44256 38. Strother Tr, James & Margaret 333 Cypress Way Unit to5 Naples, FL 341 10 Folio No. 25030 J 60005 1267 Mockingbird Lane Sun Prairie, WI 53590 39, Coulson, James 333 Cypress Way Unit to6 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 25030200004 40. Young, William E & Barbara L 333 Cypress Way Unit 201 Naples, FL 341 10 Folio No. 25030240006 41. French, Kathryn 0 333 Cypress Way Unit 202 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 25030280008 42. Poole Tr, Barbara E l?S 333 Cypress Way Unit 203 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 25030320007 22286 Valley Oaks Drive Beverly Hills, MI 48025 43. Lohman, Jack L 333 Cypress Way Unit 204 Naples, FL 3411 0 Folio No. 25030360009 44. Hicks Tr, Doin E 333 Cypress Way Unit 205 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 25030400008 5907 Alexander Lane Deale, MD 20751 45. Johnson, Margaret J 215 Cypress Way East UnitA-l Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000020 46, Caraway, Joann 215 Cypress Way East UnitA-2 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000046 47, Vibral, Donald & Schmidt, Diane 21 5 Cypress Way East UnitA-3 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000062 48. Giorango, Susan W 215 Cypress Way East Unit B-1 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000088 542 Gunderson A venue Oak Park, IL 60304 49. Hall. David E & Lana C 2 15 Cypress Way East Unit B-2 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000101 50. Downing Tr, Fran S 215 Cypress Way East l?B Unit B-3 Naples, FL 341to Folio No. 60570000127 4702 Briar Patch Court Indianapolis, IN 46250 51. Gerner, Franz-Josef & Bettina 215 Cypress Way East UnitB-4 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000143 52, Orlea, Mildred L & Richard L 215 Cypress Way East UnitB-5 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000169 53. Bonamarte, Anne M & Michael 215 Cypress Way East UnitC-1 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000185 54. Thompson, Nancy & Geoffrey 215 Cypress Way East UnitC-2 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000208 5652 Morgan Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55419 55. Kurland Tr, Joan E 215 Cypress Way East Unit C-3 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000224 14325 Country Club Lane Orland Park, IL 60462 56. Richman, Spencer & Richman Tr, Ellen J 215 Cypress Way East UnitC-4 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000240 730 Tarpon Cove Drive Apt. 201 Naples, FL 34110 57. Cabral, Yvonne & Gantzer, Jacqueline & Bleijendaal 178 215 Cypress Way East Unit C-5 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000266 58. Gauthier, Joyce Kenwood 215 Cypress Way East UnitC-6 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000282 59. Benn, John M 215 Cypress Way East UnitC-7 Naples, FL 341 to Folio No. 60570000305 60. Smith, James F & Emma Jean 215 Cypress Way East Unit C-8 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000321 61. Thies, Vera 215 Cypress Way East UnitC-9 Naples, FL 341to Folio No. 60570000347 62. Beers Est, Marion S C/O Diane M Dennis Pr 215 Cypress Way East UnitC-IO Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000363 63. Tlivigno, Frances 215 Cypress Way East UnitC-11 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000389 64. Matish, Phillip A & Brenda J 2 I 5 Cypress Way East UnitC-12 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000402 2865 Loreto Drive Willoughby, OH 44094 65. Ward, Charles J & Joan M 178 215 Cypress Way East UnitD-1 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000428 to405 San Luis Lane Orland Park, IL 60467 66, O'Donnell, David J & Roberta M 215 Cypress Way East Unit 0-2 Naples, FL 341to Folio No. 60570000444 14344 Country Club Lane Apt. L Orland Park, I L 60462 67. Brah1er, Robert B & Marilyn J 2 I 5 Cypress Way East Unit 0-3 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000460 2006 Tanglewood Circle Louisville, OH 44641 68, McDonald, James E & Carolyn J 2 15 Cypress Way East Unit 0-4 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000486 700 Diamond Circle Apt. 708 Naples, FL 34110 69. Abbott, James W 2 I 5 Cypress Way East Unit 0-5 Naples, FL 34lto Folio No. 60570000509 4023 136"' Lane NE Ham Lake, MN 55304 70. Trombetti, Pamfilo A & Delores 21 5 Cypress Way East Unit A-2 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000046 134 Eden Crest Drive Cranston, RI 02920 71. Capone, Natalina 17B~ 215 Cypress Way East Unit D-7 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000541 1043 Albany Court Naples, FL 34105 72. Nelson, Wanda 2 15 Cypress Way East Unit 0-8 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No 60570000567 73, Kurland, Thomas E & Elaine J 215 Cypress Way East UnitD-9 Naples, FL 341to Folio No. 60570000583 12520 Lucille Lane Palos Park, 1L 60464 74, Roberts, Joanne & Di1a11a, Joseph 215 Cypress Way East UnitD-10 Naples, FL 341 to Folio No. 60570000606 7462 Emilia Lane Naples, FL 34114 75. Bryant, Angela L 2 15 Cypress Way East UnitD-11 Naples, FL 341 to Folio No. 60570000622 76. Plescia, Joseph & Karen E 2]5 Cypress Way East UnitD-12 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000648 7 North McConnell A venue Bayport, NY 11705 77. Raynor, Lorene C 2 15 Cypress Way East UnitE-1 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000664 PO Box 188 Boothbay, ME 04537 78. Kravec, Stephen J & Deborah E 215 Cypress Way East UnitE-2 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000680 l?B 79. Sitarz, Shirley 215 Cypress Way East Unit E-3 Naples, FL 34110 Folio No. 60570000703 14900 Summit Place Circle Naples, FL 34119 February 4, 2008 Attn: Legals Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: A VESMT 2006-AR-I0754 Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and again on Sunday, February 17, 2008. Kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Account No. 131-138327-649100 l7B NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 110 Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Resolution is as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PETITION AVESMT-2006-AR-10754, DISCLAIMING, RENOUNCING AND VACATING THE COUNTY'S AND THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN A 25 FOOT WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER THE SOUTH AND EAST 25 FEET OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, ORIGINALLY CREATED AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 2693, PAGES 3215 AND 3216, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND NOW FURTHER DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 'A', AND ACCEPTING A REPLACEMENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT, ALSO SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 'A', IN PLACE OF THE VACATED EASEMENT. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding; you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Building W, Naples, Florida 34112, (239) 252-8380. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the County Commissioners' Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 118 TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) "'--~.._~.._-,..>>- Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -t:Otlp-ty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY ctOURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST , P.O. BOX 413044 , NAPLES, FLORI DA'11l 0 1-3044 ... l?B Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 4,2008 La Playa Golf Club, LLC 116 Viking Way Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~~~lL~t>sf2\ ~K Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.cIerk.collier.fl.us ~-~'_.,--_._~_._-------_._---_._---._.__,,_'"'__."'__~.,M___,__,.,~,~__,.,,________ Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerklalclerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -eoupty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAM lAM I 1\RAIL E~ST P.O, BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORlDA~4101-30~4 .. li'S Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 4,2008 Jim Carr Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc. 7400 Tamiami Trail North Naples, FL 34108 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, ~IGHT E. BROCK, CLERK , 'U0i Cc PCLcL~(Ll \ c eresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone-(239) 732-2646 Website- www.clerk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Emai1-collierclerk(ti)c1erk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -eOWlty of Collier t_--. CLERK OF THE CIRCUlT COURT COLLIER COUNTY Q:OURT~OUSE 330 J T AMIAMI TRAIL EAST , P.O. BOt 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA '~~IOJ-30~4 .. .L?B~ Clerk of Court Accountan Audita Custodian of County Fund: February 5,2008 Falcon Ridge Neighborhood Association, Inc. P.O. Box 110207 Naples, FL 34108 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner; Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. Yau are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~( ft'GS(LI ~C Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.coIlier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-coIliercIerk(il)clerk.coIlier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts 'eD~nty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTfIOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI T(R,AIL EAST P.O. BOX413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA:f4IOl-3044 ... 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Mr. Angelo Lucarelli & Ms. Gail Lucarelli 400 Euclid Drive Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner; Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~ fltr ~ ' . '. . .~ 5(27 . 0> eresa Polas i, Deputy Ie?R- Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(tVclerk.collier.t1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts ___mm___. __ ('.] . '-eounty of CollIer L.- ", CLERK OF THE CIRCUJT COURT COLLIER COUNTY d:OURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST , P.O. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA '1'1101-3044 ... 1 ? 8 14 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Sawgrass of Naples Residents Association, Inc. 2338 Immokalee Road #137 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DW GHT E. BROCK, CLERK \ " . ,/1/1,'1 U.' '\r ' J1-'CC"-.'j't d_______ Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.cIerk.collier.fl.us Fax-(239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerklalclerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts ~ounty. of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTBOUSE 3301 TAMlAMI ~RA1L EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA~4tol-3044 * 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Kes Ramsay 277 Sawgrass Court Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Ml4f1!tYfJ-;4llk._ Teresa Polaski, cleguty Cfe"rk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.clerk.collier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerkrtiJclerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -eounty of Collier 1;_. CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURT,?OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. Bot 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 441 0 1-3044 * 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Ms. Kathleen J. Thurston 273 Sawgrass Court Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~('/(t fJ(~{YJ1\ :) ~ Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone-(239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.colIier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email- colIierclerklalclerk.colIier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts ~Dun, ty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY (COURTFlOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI ~RAIL E!\ST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA _Htol-3044 .. 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Mr. Edwin Glasberg 269 Sawgrass Court Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~' fJ..' .,'If \ (.L1-&t. /ff-{jl,~(L1 Ac. eresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk '. Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 W cbsitc- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerklalclerk.coIlier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts .eounty ofC'o'l1ier ,-- CLERK OF THE CI~CU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY CCOURT,?OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST " P.O. BO:X 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA:t1tol-30f4 ... 17B~~ Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Koco & Aksinja Shkurti 265 Sawgrass Court Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK (\ 0lU~{ fl,~~L. '~<-.. \T~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Fax- (239) 775-2755 Website- www.c1erk.collier.t1.us Email-collierclerklalclerk.collier.t1.us Dwight E, Brock Clerk of Courts -County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU,T COURT COLLIER COUNTY C:OURTllOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAsT , P.O. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101-3044 *" 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Joseph R. & Karen L. Luteran 261 Sawgrass Court Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~7 f(ltl~f:; !jc' Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk ~. Enclosure . '^~.n._._~_ H__..._~.". "_"~"'_"'_~_'~ ".."......--... .._.~,..._-~--~------,--_..,,'-~~.,. Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.colIier.t1.us Fax-(239) 775.2755 Email-colIiercIerk(a)Clerk.colIier.t1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -eounty of Collier L_, , CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY C'OURTaOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI 1(RAIL Ei\ST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORlDAl1101.3044 ... 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Joseph R Epifanio 16 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner; Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK a;?~~ t/~t(z'( ~2..-- Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Fax- (239) 775-2755 Wcbsite- www.c1erk.collier.t1.us Email-collierclerklalclerk.collier.t1.us -----.__.,_,~_.___._._....__.'"0..._. "_."_,...'m,..~__,__.,,_.,.u_.,,.~.......,",,,_~,____~__.~,~",,__,_._.__._,~_ Dwight E. Brock Clcrk of Courts ~ounty of Collier c_ CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI 1(RAlL EAST PO. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA ''',4101-3044 .. 178' Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Dennis A. & Sheryl A. Riddle 18 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK (~LL~f'( &'8;k'1 ~------ Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure ..._^_. d,_.,.__.,~.__~... ., ',_.. .~__',_____._____... Phonc- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.t1.us Fax-(239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(ti)c1erk.collier.t1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eoupty of COllier CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY C;:OURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI1(RAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA:f1l01-3044 .. l?8 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Braulio & Adiela Escobar 20 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT -2006-AR-l 0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK (\ ~, , . IQ~ Ijt{a~t[{ >~ ~ki, Deputy Clerk . Enclosure ".,.-.--. ---~.._-.~.-_..,.",-"_.,~.,'~------- ---"-""'-~"._--'~"----"'-'-'--" Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.t1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-colliercIerklalcIerk.collier.t1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts {~ounty of Collier I.. ~" CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COlJ'NTY C;:OURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI ~RAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDAJ4l01-3044 -,' l?B Clerk of COUl1S Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Everett C. & Donna J. Short 22 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK (\ \) LLU~ P6({tS@, j~ ~ \~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.t1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-colliercIerklalclerk.collier.t1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts .eounty of Collier L. CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY <.tOURT,?OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI 1\RAIL EAST P.O. BO~ 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA '.Htol-3044 * 17t Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Andrew & Mary Tennent, Sf. 24 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK I~~ ftl(iS(t~ ~C>~_. Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.cIerk.collier.t1.us -~-'~--'~-'--_."~'----'-'--'- _'__'~'-"_~''''_--_''''.'~-_.__''_-~,.q-_..,-,-- ......_--~.,-_. '.--....__...__...__...'w__..___........_""_. Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerklalcIerk.collier.t1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -eounty of Collier t___ CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY <I:OURTt.IOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST " P.O. BO}( 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA'_HI01-3044 -$- l?B Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Vandoran & Robin L. Kerekes 26 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner; Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing, Sincerely, :JDWIGHT E'jfBROCK, CL::RK ( . ~_ ' -,(j).81;... k esa Pol as i, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Websitc- www.c1erk.collier.t1.us Fax-(239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(aJclerk.collier.t1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY C:OURTfloUSE \ 3301 TAMIAMI T,RAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA .~,~ 1 0 1-3044 .. 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Thomas R. & Audrey F. Joyce 28 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~ ji"tC,'J \- \,_ · t.C~ K'C4--61~ TC~ esa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.cIerk.collier.t1.us Fax-(239) 775-2755 Email-collierc1erk(ti)c1erk.collier.t1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts .eounty of Collier ,- CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE \ 330 I T AMIAMJ TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES. FLORIDA 3'41 0 1-3044 .. 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Robert D. & loann Rice 30 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK (\ V LUC!\.eCCJ-St~)~ \~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure ---~----~_._--_.,.- ........ -_...._~...- _..,.._._'-_.,--_.,----_."..,_...._~-,_._..'^_.,--"_.,--..- Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax-(239) 775-2755 Email-collierc1erklalclerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eounty of Collier \--.. - CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST " P.O. BOt 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA~410l.3044 ..Ji} 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Chester M. & June Raymond 34 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK e::lLU_..AJJ"--- 'f6{{C~(1l ~C_ Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732.2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax-(239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(ti)c1erk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eOll;Ilty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY <!'OURT~OUSE 330 I T AMI AMI T,RAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA3:~IOI-30fl4 * 17 B '" Clcrk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Elizabeth & Angelo Pirrone 25 Madison Drive Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK (' 'J. UG,,- Pc;(Q_;:;f~\ he l ~~Iaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 W cbsitc- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 EmaiJ- collierclerkia!c1erk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts .eounty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURT!lOUSE 3301 TAMIAM11(RAIL EAsT P.O. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORlDAr410l-3044 ..:i~ '1 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 David & Donna Peterson 29 Madison Drive Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~ 1 ULtc:c_ ~J~e.( ~ \~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure --~---'._--,-,._._..._.__..._.._-,~...__...-,",,--_.._-'-'-~""~.'-""-'---~"~"~'-- Phone-(239) 732-2646 Website- www.cIerk.collier.fl.us Fax-(239) 775-2755 Emai1-collierclerk(wcIerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eounty of Collier \,,~ - CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTaOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAJL Ej~ST " P.O, BOX 413044. NAPLES. FLORIDA ~\l101-3044 *' "~B - /'.'" .' ;.' " Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Mino & Silvana Biancaniello 33 Madison Drive Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26,2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK C' rJ ilLW2" Pc-tO--S1L( ~~,. "~ Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Fax- (239) 775-2755 Website- www.clerk.collier.fl.us Email-collierclerk(ti).c1erk.collier.ll.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eOll!1ty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTfJOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI T\RAIL EAST P.O. 80~ 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA.r41 0 1-3044 * 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Lukas Ramik & Kristyna Ramikova 21 Madison Drive Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK C' I) LL-lL-0- {i:Ul${fL{ ~ \<\:Th~:~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax-(239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerklalclerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eounty of Collier ~,~ CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAMl ~R,AlL EAST P.O BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA~410l-3044 *' 17B Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Sean Mahoney 34 Madison Drive Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner; Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK r\ /}, lULZ ~(tLHL( ))(j ~olaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732.2646 Fax- (239) 775-2755 Website- www.clerk.collier.fl.us Email- collierclerklalclerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts ~ounty of Collier l_ -^ CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY <COURT BOUSE 330 I T AMIAMI T,RAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA .~~ 1 0 1-30fl4 *' 17 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Barbara Poole, Tr 333 Cypress Way Unit 203 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~ to Llll,.('" ~ttCL~Z tbL. \~esa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.clerk.coIlier.fl.us Fax-(239) 775-2755 Email-coIlierclerk(ti)clerk.coIlier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -et}unty of Collier L__." _., CLERK OF THE CIRCD~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURT!JOUSE 3301 TAM1AMI l1R,A1L EAsT P.O. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA-t1l()I-30~4 .. 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Barbara Poole, Tr 333 Cypress Way Unit 203 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~ (J t I I \.Q ~cio-YJZ\ ~ \~Iaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Web site- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us -------'~---'_..~."._'-"._'-----"-_._~--~-_.._-----_._._.--~ -, -'---"---.-"- Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(a)c1erk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts .eounty of Collier L_- CLERK OF THE CI~CU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY <WURTlIOUSE 330 I T AMIAM11(RAIL EAsT P.O, BOt 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA~~tol-30f4 *' 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Stephen & Deborah Kravec 215 Cypress Way East Unit E-2 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT -2006-AR-l 0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. Yau are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK (\ /J I I , I P", ~~1L\bc ~'~ski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.clerk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(ti)clerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts --eounty of Collier 1,>- CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST , P.O. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA '.H 101-3044 * 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Angela Bryant 215 Cypress Way East UnitD-11 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner; Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK (\ '1~ ~r:t()-~-t,~t')~l~-- ~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone-(239) 732-2646 Website- www.clerk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerklalclerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eountyof Collier \.._- , CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY C:OURT!IOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST , P.O. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA~4tol-3044 *' 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Wanda Nelson 215 Cypress Way East Unit 0-8 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. Yau are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK f\ /) V--CV7{ HS{(LVIC l h-c ~ Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Web site- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(ti)c1erk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts .eounty of Collier CLERK OF THE CI~CUfT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTfjlOUSE 330 I T AMIAMI T,RAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLOR!DA.f~101-30~4 .. 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Frances Trivigno 215 Cypress Way East UnitC-11 Naples, FL 341 J 0 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK (\ rJ l)uJ.((Rfa.Q:tl)~ ~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure __.^_ _. ...._._..'__.0_~"..__,.___..___,__._~ Phone-(239) 732-2646 Website- www.cIerk.coIlier.l1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-coIlierclerklalclerk.coIlier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -eounty of Collier c~ CLERK OF THE CIRCUJT COURT COLLIER COUNTY <tOURT~OUSE 3301 T AMIAMI T,~AIL EAST P.O, BOt 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA~~101-30~4 * 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Marion S. Beers, Est c/o Diane M. Dennis, Pr 215 Cypress Way East Unit C-10 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK (\ D lUi€t f)o(g.Q(z( ;.~ ~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.cIerk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierc1erklalcIerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts '-eounty of Collier I,n.' . CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY <tOURTnOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI1([{AIL EAsT P.O. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 ... 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Vera Thies 215 Cypress Way East Unit C-9 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK \' 1 ~LR -p6(gg~,- ~L l..~~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure ._.._--"---_.-.~."-."------,"--_._--~.,.-..._.._-"-_.- ---~,-~-,-,,-_.__..._--~,_._._.,.._- - ---"-'~~-' Phone-(239) 732-2646 W cbsite- www.clerk.colIier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-colIierclerk(tiIc1erk.colIier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts ~-ountyof Collier \.;--'" ' CLERK OF THE CIRCUfT COURT COLLIER COUNTY CCOURTflOUSE 3301 TAM1AMI rR,A1L E,{ST P.O. BO~ 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA!41Ol-30~4 . 171 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 James & Emma Jean Smith 215 Cypress Way East Unit C-8 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK (\ V Ill1e'A. ~((/?tc~ ~( ~e\fa' Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure --_.,.~-~,_._~---.- Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.coIlier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-coIlierclerklalclerk.coIlier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eounty of CbUier 'c_ CLE~o?JE;~~f;~~~gu~?URT 3301 TAM1AMI T,R,AIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101-3044 .~~ 178 'I Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 John M. Benn 215 Cypress Way East Unit C-7 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26,2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. Yau are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, " D Dll IGGHHIT E. BROCK',,~~E,RK ~LC~?cL~'1ll'\ bC__ '. Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerklalc1erk.collier.fl.us Phone-(239) 732-2646 Website- www.clerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -eounty of Collier 1.- CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY (WURT~OUSE 3301 TAM1AMI ~R,AIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA~4tol-30~4 .. 17 B&;J Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Joyce Kenwood Gauthier 215 Cypress Way East UnitC-6 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. Yau are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ("\ 'J, . tc,,- D.. (~~}l ~ . ~aski, b~uty Clerk - ~. Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerklalclerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eounty of Collier \~.- CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY <WURT!;IOUSE 3301 TAM1AM11;RAlL E.'\ST P.O BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORlDA3~tol-3044 .. 17E Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Yvonne Cabral & Jacqueline & Bleijendaal Gantzer 215 Cypress Way East UnitC-5 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK /\S-l~ ~GG~~tzA ~,. Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure ----.---.__~~__,__~."'___~_~___,_.'~_~_____,.h_...... .. _.'_._.._.,__._.._._"___w__.""_,._.__.___. Phone- (239) 732-2646 Web site- www.clerk.collier.ll.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerklalclerk.colIier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts 'eountyof Collier \,_. CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY (WURTl!OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI T,RAIL EAST P.O. BOt 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDAWOl.30~4 ... 17B~ Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Ann & Michael Bonamarte 215 Cypress Way East UnitC-I Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK r~Rb\~k~<-- Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Web site- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerklalcIerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts {:o~ty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY tOURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI rRA1L EAST P.O. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA '~4101-3044 ... !. 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Mildred & Richard Orlea 215 Cypress Way East UnitB-5 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. Yau are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~{c&k~~<--- sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 W cbsite- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerklalcIerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts .--eount,y of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY <tOURTl.IOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAsT , P.O, BOX413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA'r~tol-3044 *' 178f Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Franz-Josef & Bettina Gerner 215 Cypress Way East Unit B-4 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~-tl ~YLLl ~G Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone-(239) 732-2646 Website- www.cIerk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email- collierclerklalcIerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts e-ounty of Collier L'. , CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY <!:OURTl'iOUSE 330 I T AMI AMI TRAIL EAsT , P,O. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA~41 0] -3044 .. 178 .~ Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 David & Lana Hall 215 Cypress Way East Unit B-2 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~ I() I LU..~_ Pt0-~t.A lx \~ Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email- collierclerklalclerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts , - eounty of Collier l:___. CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY <!:OURTBOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI '[(RAIL EAsT P.O BOX 413044" NAPLES, FLORIDA '~~ 1 0 1-3044 *" 178'1Si Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Donald Vibral and Diane Schmidt 215 Cypress Way East UnitA-3 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-10754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK (' 0, . . '12" ~c.Co-Xl~ p~ \--~Iaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.clerk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email- collierc1erklalclerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -eounty of Collier \,." CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY C::OURT~OUSE 3301 TAMlAMI TRAIL EAST , P.O, Bot 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA '~~101-3044 *' 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Joann Caraway 215 Cypress Way East UnitA-2 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK _ IJ 'D. c~'^- ~t:0-~S~, :r~ Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-colliercIerklalclerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts .-eountyofCollier L..., CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURT110USE 3301 TAMIAMI ~RAIL E.~ST P.O, BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA~4tol-3044 * 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 ~argaretJ.Johnson 215 Cypress Way East Unit A-I Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~ ,. : "-"-^-Nc,-._\t.t~~~(c--\'D'<---" . eresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax-(239) 775-2755 Email-colliercIerkia!cIerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts .eounty of Collier \,- CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAM11(R,AIL EAST P.O. BO:X 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA~4l01-3044 * 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Jack Lohman 333 Cypress Way Unit 204 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. Yau are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~}..Q,-~~~ iJ~ Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email- collierclerk(ti)c1erk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eounty of Collier \;-- , CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTI:'IOUSE 330 I T AMIAMI 1(j\AIL E,,{,ST P.O. BO:1( 413044. NAPLES. FLORIDA:r~tol-30f14 *' 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Kathryn French 333 Cypress Way Unit 202 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK "' () L,,-~ \t>c \~k\~L \,~ Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Websitc- www.clerk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierc1erk(tiiclerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -eounty of Collier \~~ . CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAM! f,RAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA:f~101-30'l4 *' 1 78 tli. Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 William & Barbara Young 333 Cypress Way Unit 201 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. Yau are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK o 1 LeUa.. ~J't(2/( J c \'-~~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone-(239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax-(239) 775.2755 Email-collierclerklalclerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts ~oupty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL Ej~ST " P.O, BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA'14101-30;i4 * 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 James Coulson 333 Cypress Way Unit 106 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~ JlA.J~~,)..~~12r'~~_ \~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Web sitc- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(mclerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts --eounty of Collier 1::_. _ CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI T,RAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 , NAPLES, FLORIDA $101-3044 *' l78 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Thomas & Carol Roettele 333 Cypress Way Unit 102 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK .~~tll.h" \)C(o.(.{pt'~ C.___ Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.cIerk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-colliercIerklalclerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eounty of Collier L-_ CLERK OF THE CIRCU1T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURT!IOUSE 3301 TAMlAMI T,RAIL E~ST P.O BOX413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101-30f4 * 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Nancy J. Johnson 221 Cypress Way Unit 207 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ( il U-llC,- ~&R%h~)~ ~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Web site- www.cIerk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-colliercIerklalcIerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e-ounty of Collier t~_ CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE 3301 T AM1AMI "(,RAIL EAST P.O BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORlDAl110l-3044 .. 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Thomas & Salley Dunck1ey 221 Cypress Way Unit 206 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK C fJ ~C?^'- ?c.~C{:4..-~tL\~ '. ~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone-(239) 732-2646 Website- www.clerk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(il:clerk.collier.t1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -eounty of Collier \~- - CLERK OF THE CIRCUJT COURT COLLIER COUNTY ~:OURT,?OUSE 330 I T AMIAMI T,RAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101-3()44 4- , 178 Clcrk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Phyllis A. Reed 221 Cypress Way Unit 205 Naples, FL 34110 . Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-t0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK r-. <J LU-~L ~D(crih~k \~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Web site- www.clerk.coIlier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-coIlierclerkialclerk.coIlier.n.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'tHmty of Collier ,,- CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY (WURT~lOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST " P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101-30~4 -$- 278 " Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Clifford & Mabel Moulds 221 Cypress Way Unit 203 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~ <J LLUe< PCUSIZ,--:X~ \ ~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Web site- www.c1erk.collier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'ounty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY <tOURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI "(~[L EAST P.O. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA '~41O 1-3044 -$- 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 AR Baggs 221 Cypress Way Unit 202 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~~S42L'D-~ eresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.coIlier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts .eounty o..f Collier l_ , CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY Q:OURT(IOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI T,~IL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA '34101-3044 -$- 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Carol A. Reed 221 Cypress Way Unit 201 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK (" 'f)l{ We. ~t~ll21'L{ ~ \~~saj:>olaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.l1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-coIlierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'CH.l;Ilty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI WIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 ... _c, '~ !. /8 rf.:, t/ " Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Christopher G. Wiles 221 Cypress Way Unit 108 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK ~ '~ t ~ \ \" L\'-c~~ t ,G-?rL.. ," "" eresa Polaski, Deputy ~ler~ Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.coIlier.l1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.coIlier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'Oll;11ty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY ~OURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST " P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA '~41 0 1-3044 -$- 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 George Di Longo 22 Madison Drive Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK " ()lLtJ[L P[.lo..~1;.1. ~ ~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.coIlier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.coIlier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eounty of Collier 1.- CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTtlOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI l(RAIL EAST P.O BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA~1101,3044 -$- 178 . Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Sandra Jean St. John 26 Madison Drive Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008, You are invited to attend this public hearing, Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK \' 0,. ~\... 8~~tQ\4''k- "~laski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732,2646 Website- www.cIerk.collier.l1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-coIliercIerk(a)Clerk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'ounty of Collier t_, ., CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY ltOURT(IOUSE 3301 TAM1AMI l(~IL EAST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA r4101,30~4 -$- _t.. 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Norman & Kamila Gentry 30 Madison Drive Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing, Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~ ;1l~ ~o-trJ.- ){2-{ ':D~, '-~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone-(239) 732-2646 Website- www.clerk.collier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-colIierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'ounty of Collier \'---" , CLERK OF THE CIRCUJT COURT COLLIER COUNTY crOURT(IOUSE 3301 TAM1AMI TcRA.IL Ej\ST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA~1101,3044 -$- J.78 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Shirley Sitarz 215 Cypress Way East Unit E-3 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK (\ 1/ ~~6~ ~Y;t4 (;K-._ \~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure ----~._..,-. .. _.....,~._,_~.__.m'__ _~.__.______._,_._"'_.__"_ "w._._ ........ .~.",. ,_'""_._.",, . . Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.coIlier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.coIlier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eour-ty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTtlOUSE , \ 3301 TAMIAMI '(RAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA',H 10 1-3044 4- 17B Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Lorene Raynor 215 Cypress Way East Unit E-I Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, ~DWIGHT E, BRO~CK' CLE~K , ( . ':'\ "-;> WG\', . (lQv~{1.\. r,,"------, , sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.cIerk.collier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(Q)cIerk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eOll;11ty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY ltOURTBOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI l(~IL EAST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101,3044 ~~ ire Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Natalina Capone 215 Cypress Way East UnitD,7 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008, You are invited to attend this public hearing, Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~ \. \\\ ( (,I..,;{Z}<- , ' '--L",.c\.. \'()~!- D . \. k.... -. eresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775,2755 Email-colliercIerk(Q)cIerk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts ~Oll;11ty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY C:OURTaOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI "(~IL EAST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA '~~10I,3044 -$- J 171 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Joseph & Karen Plescia 215 Cypress Way East UnitD,l2 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing, Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK i\ 1\ ~.. ~t-{o--~t0S.,~,- \,~ Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Web site- www.cIerk.collier.f1.us Fax-(239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(Q)cIerk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'ounty of Collier l__ CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY ltOURTtlOUSE 3301 T AMIAMI TRAIL EAST , P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA'f41 0 1-3044 -$- l7a Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Joanne Roberts & Joseph Dilalla 215 Cypress Way East Unit D-IO Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT -2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK (\ IJC'-.,lJve\ ~L~L~V1'D(-::'-,- l~~ Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.cIerk.coIlier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email.coIlierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eounty of Collier '-~ CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI l(RAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA .:t4I01,3044 -$- 17B Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Thomas & Elaine Kurland 215 Cypress Way East Unit D-9 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. Yau are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK c{QLUb.~ \\W%ft-.'0~m Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.f1.us Fax-(239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'ounty of Collier \,-- CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTijOUSE 3301 T AMIAMI ~RAIL EAST P.O. BO~ 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101-3044 -$- 17ai~ Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Pamfilo & Delores Trombetti 215 Cypress Way East UnitA-2 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing, Sincerely, DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK ~U-LW. PCJ__~2c \C, , Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Web site- www.clerk.collier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-colIierclerk(ti:c1erk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eountYof Collier 1.__-... , CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTBOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST , P.O. 80'<413044, NAPLES, FLORlDA~41 0 1-30~4 -$- 17a Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 James Abbott 215 Cypress Way East Unit D-5 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK (\ A l~UC(_ YCCfc~tL(~/ '~~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.clerk.collier.f1.us Fax, (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(wclerk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eounty of COllier 1.--' _ CLERK OF THE CIRCU1T COURT COLLIER COUNTY Q:OURT,?OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI l(~IL EAST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA '~4101,30~4 -$- 17a Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 James & Carolyn McDonald 215 Cypress Way East Unit D-4 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing, Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK (\ ~ Lu.LLC PLla9Z{'K- \ ~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone-(239) 732-2646 Website- www.clerk.collier.f1.us Fax-(239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eounty of Collier L,~ CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY t1:0URTHOUSE 330 I T AMIAM1 TRAIL EAST , P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA '3'1101,3044 -$- 17a Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Robert & Marilyn Brahaler 215 Cypress Way East UnitD,3 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, r!;:;;l;~~l< Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.l1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email- colliercIerk(il;c1erk.collier.l1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'ounty of Collier \.:-- - , CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTtlOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI l(RAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDAW01,3044 -$- 178 ~ Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 David & Roberta O'Donnell 215 Cypress Way East UnitD-2 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008, You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, D~l::~ BRP6~~~~~ ~a Pol""k;,' Depoty CI"k Enclosure Phone- (239) 732,2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierc1erk(Q).cIerk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'ounty of Collier 1.___.. , CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI T,~IL EAST P,O. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 -$- 17a Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Charles & Joan Ward 215 Cypress Way East UnitD-l Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008, You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK r:-Il. L~, '\\)Cc~~LL b~- \~~sa Polaski, 6eputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Fax- (239) 775-2755 Web site- www.clerk.collier.f1.us Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eounty of Collier ,-- CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST , P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDAr41 0 1-3044 . 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Phillip & Brenda Matish 215 Cypress Way East UnitC,12 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. Yau are invited to attend this public hearing, Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK G20LUC"'., fo(9-,~V\1 C___ Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email.collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'ounty of Collier ,- CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI l(~IL EAST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA:WOI,3044 ... . 178~ Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Spencer Richman Ellen J. Richman, Tr 215 Cypress Way East Unit C-4 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008, You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK (' tJ. . . 'h ~JD-~~~~ "~i, DeputyClerk Enclosure Phone-(239) 732-2646 Website- www.cIerk.coIlier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-coIlierclerk(Q)cIerk.coIlier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eOU[1ty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY tOURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAMI T,RAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDAJ4101-3044 -$- 178 C Icrk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of Coullty Funds February 5, 2008 Joall E, Kurland, Tr 215 Cypress Way East Unit C-3 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. Yau are invited to attend this public hearing, Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~ ~)"l - 0/; -\. be : ~\0~ ~G\..C.lL-NL "-.........._. ". esa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732,2646 Web site- www.c1erk.collier.f1.us Fax-(239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(tl:c1erk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eounty of Collier " CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY <COURT!IOUSE 3301 TAM1AMI '(RAIL E;\ST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDAJ410l,3044 fr l?B Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Nancy & Geoffrey Thompson 215 Cypress Way East UnitC,2 Naples. FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. Yau are invited to attend this public hearing, Sincerely, DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK ~LLLLO-. ~o{a81Ll L Teresa PolaskI, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.colIier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-colIierclerk(ti:c1erk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eounty of Collier 1,- CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAlvIIAMI '(RAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101,3044 ~Jt" l?p Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Fran Downing, Tr 215 Cypress Way East Unit B-3 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK c-\J. ~.~k-~L\,)L }~ Polaski, 1~puty Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Web site- www.cIerk.collier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775,2755 Email-collierclerk(wclerk.collier.t1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eounty of Collier \--.- CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTtlOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL Ef~ST , P.o. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDAr4101,30~4 1~ I?" ; Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Susan W. Giorango 215 Cypress Way East Unit B-1 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing, Sincerely, DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK ~ (J t~~ i1:~1.~L[ )C_ I ~a Polaski, ~uty Clerk Enclosure Phone-(239) 732-2646 Website- www.clerk.colIier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-colIierclerk(li)c1erk.colIier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'ounty of Collier ,_ CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTaOUSE 3301 T AMIAMI TRAIL El~ST , P.O. BOX 413044 < NAPLES, FLORIDA '~4101-3044 -$- 118 Clerk of Courts Aecountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Doin E. Hicks, Tr 333 Cypress Way Unit 205 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 l.lnd Sunday, February 17, 2008, You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK !~t1t'(SLku ( ~...~ Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone-(239) 732-2646 Website- www.clerk.collier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'ounty of Collier t_'. . CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY Q:OURT~OUSE 3301 TAM1AMI TRAIL EAST PO BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101,307l4 -$- 118 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 James & Margaret Strother, Tr 333 Cypress Way Unit 105 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008, Yau are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK - (). U. \Q,-- ~~~L-t'l) c...._ r'~a POlaski, Iiguty Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Web site- www.clerk.collier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email- collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'ounty of Collier t__ CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURT!JOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST , P,O. BOX 413044. NAPLES, FLORIDA'~4101-3044 -$- 17/" ,- Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Una Rosa Bryant, Est Keybank National Association Pr 333 Cypress Way, Unit 103 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK "'~-1fL0L1 ~~.. '~sr=i;laski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone-(239) 732-2646 Website, www.c1erk.collier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775,2755 Email-colIierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'o~ty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE 330 I TAMIAMI TRAIL EA,ST " P.O. BOX 413044 , NAPLES, FLORIDA 44101,3044 -$- l?n Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Troy Lee & Corene Hicks 333 Cypress Way Unit 101 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing, Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK o :)~. Vcs~~~\.b <--.. '\~a Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone, (239) 732-2646 Web site- www.clerk.collier.f1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(ii)c1erk.collier.f1.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'ounty of C:()llier l_ CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY C:OURTtlOUSE 330 I T AMIAMI TRAIL EAST , P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORlDA '~41OI,3044 ... 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Pontiac National Bk Tr 221 Cypress Way Unit 208 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing, Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Qto-~0-1~/ Deputy Clerk Enclosure _'___"_c_..___~_"__.___._,_,."," '-~'~'-___'_ -. '-'_'___'_* _._._ .____~____"..__,._.._"___...*.....__._,__~,__"._._"_.._._ .., '." _....,..~._.~~_w__.________....__.,.~_ Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-coIlierclerk(iVclerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eounty of Collier L_ CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY Q:OURT~OUSE 3301 T AMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044.. NAPLES, FLORIDA~4IOI,30~4 -$- 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Karlene K. Putnam 221 Cypress Way Unit 204 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008, You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK f\ <J LLL\(A ~~~ \. ~esa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.cIerk.coIIier.l1.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-coIIiercIerk((iJcIerk.coIIier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'ountyof Collier 1:-- . CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAM[ TRAIL E.~ST P.O. BOX 413044. !\APLES, FLORIDA ~4101,3044 .. 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 George Dublino, Tr & Marilyn Dublino 221 Cypress Way, Unit 107 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT -2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing, Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK \:~L~, jtb{O~;~/1 /Y- "'-~esa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure "__~__'____.__._...____._._..M_.______.___.~_. Phone-(239) 732,2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email- collierclerk(a;cIerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'Oll;11ty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY ltOURTtlOUSE 330 I T AMIAMI r,RAIL E;\ST P.O, BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA~4101,30~4 -$- l?S Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 William A. Bayer 221 Cypress Way Unit 106 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK '" iJ LLClliL Pc Lt1S;Jz i \ / ("'~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Web site- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-colIierclerk(tl)c1erk.colIier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'Oll;11ty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAM1 TRAIL E3.ST , P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101,3044 . l?S Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Theodore M. Gray 221 Cypress Way Unit 105 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008, You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~ ()U-'Ll(~ &~~':p<--- \'--~sa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 732-2646 Web site- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax-(239) 775-2755 Email-colliercIerk(tl;cIerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'nunty of Collier 1._.. I CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY (WURTaOUSE \ 3301 T AMIAMI l(RAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA~41 0 1,3044 -$- 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Elizabeth Brubaker 221 Cypress Way Unit 104 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice, The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008, You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK C' ;)'J~ fi&.~2k/t ~ ~ \-~aski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone, (239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email.colliercIerk(iVclerk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'mmty of Collier ,- CLERK OF THE CIRCU!T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURT~OUSE 3301 TAMIAM1 T,RAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA ~4101-3044 . 17B Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Earl Edgar Arblaster 221 Cypress Way Unit 103 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008, You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, ~DtIGHT E, BR~~ CLE~ I"~ 'L~~e"^- ruc6S6~ ~Z/ eresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone-(239) 732-2646 Website- www.c1erk.colIier.fl.us Fax-(239) 775-2755 Email-collierc1erk(Q)c1erk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts -e'ounty of Collier I.-- CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY ltOURT80USE 3301 TAMIAMI l(RAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA'~4101-3044 -$- 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Carolyn Kasischkle, Tr William & Beth Placke, Jr. 221 Cypress Way, Unit 102 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17,2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK \' (U LLt~ )j)Z(a~{L ,'D<--- \'~a Polaski, tJeputy Clerk Enclosure ~---'--"'-'~~"._----'._--'-"~-"-- Phone- (239) 732-2646 Web site- www.clerk.collier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eounty of Collier '.. CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTaOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BO~413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA '~41O 1-3044 -$- 17B Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5, 2008 Foster Zanetti, et ux 221 Cypress Way Unit 101 Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition A VESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK \ 0. llV'- Pu{cLgl~t .~~ \~ Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure ",.-..--." _.____'.0_.._".' ._"'"~"._" ',._._,,,,__ ,,_ , . ._....~m__.".._...... ,,_~_ ,_,,_,_ __"N^_"',,__~_____"~_._,,__ Phone- (239) 732-2646 Web site- www.c1erk.coIlier.fl.us Fax- (239) 775-2755 Email-coIlierclerkla)c1erk.coIlier.fl.us Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts eOUflty of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY ltouRTaoUSE 3301 TAMIAMI l(RAIL EAST P.O. BO;:< 413044, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101,3044 -$- 178 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds February 5,2008 Eraldo & Rosaria MaITeUi 32 Heritage Way Naples, FL 34110 Re: Petition AVESMT-2006-AR-I0754 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10,2008 and Sunday, February 17, 2008. You are invited to attend this public hearing, Sincerely, cZIWGHTE.BROCK,CLERK f) /' 'f~ \ , , '--C!o..... I-Ci_{~~~ IS~ Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Enclosure -~-._~._'-----" -~--"~<...__..._.-" -..--.---- _.~ Phone- (239) 732-2646 Fax- (239) 775-2755 Web site- www.cIerk.collier.fl.us Email-collierclerk(Q)c1erk.collier.n.us ---~~._-- 02/11/2008 00:18 23g2534703 foreign AOOOWlt trumber 001230 Ad# 1667825 Ad Net COllt ~;603 .24 COLLl:l!:~ GOV COMl'LIill( IlLOG J Name (primary) Company (primaryl Street I (Primary) ,'.(). TAMIAMJ: TRAIL Iii city (Primary) NAPLJ:S State (Pr~nary) FL ZIP (Primaryl 39112 phone (primary) i23:') 774-44H Claus code 0,l20 - N"t: oe of Me"tinq StArt Date 0://10/201)8 0:2/17f~OOII Stop Date prepayment Am.OU~:: Sf) . I 0 Ad Sales Rep. 716 - SlOoky J. RUey width 1 Pepth 147 Nella: e. ~Blle. HIARING Notl/;. Isl'I.reby IIj~el'l that'" ..... of COIrtY <:ommilllo"ers of' eor. ne; County \Al1Il held a p'ublk:: hearin. on Tue.t- Av.,""",,,,,'~21lO1" the loardr(loM. 3rt:! ,lqO~. Admlnllt.ra.tiMl Ulldi"G. coln.rCol,ll'ltY Government C.rrttt. 3301 ElIIt Tam!"",l Tr.~. Napl... fl(;\l'lda. Thl 1J1,..ting will bllGln .t '1GliI J..M;: TI'Ie tltl. Dttlw DfO.Pi- Rellolutlon hi: as tol OWl: A RESOLUTION OF lHE IOARD O' COUNTY ~ M1S$IONl!.S OF e '~IR COUNT'Y 'l I A. A"ATlNe Td TI AVQMH_ .6."-1 ,OISCLAIPJI..e. REN U CING AND VA- CATINO THI COUNTY'S "ND TH! IJ08!'IC'S. IN. T1iRIST I N A S FeOT WID' DOA'NA I !AS'. MINT OVIR THE. SOUTH A.MD lAST 2J 'UT 01' TH! N"!liRlI' OF TH! NORTHW V" Of' TttE NOR1HW V4 OF TH! .eUTH V' Of .oe- TlON 24, TOW~HIP 4 ~ror.~oo..,'(,.~..I~n, AND II~DlD It.! MI- CIAl.. CORD 1001( 21S11, P is 321S AND 321.. I. ...."e AE. COFlOS r;OLL.I~R cOUNTY. ..CRIDA. AND NOW FURTHER DE- SeR"ED IN THE AT. T~~H'D ..HI.,T 'A', ANAl ACCIPT'~'iIA lit!. ~~fJ~\!,J,!'.....~~OJ ~1oI8~N ON 'tHE iT. TACH!. EXHI"'T "'t IN PlAt! m'TH VACA ED fA5UdINT. NO"": All Persons wl:llhlno to ,"",konan;i AOIIndAItIIm",u.tIWf;JIi:. CLASS PAGE 08 178 02/11/2008 00:18 lOr w~h the COUnty 0;- mlnlstratOI' frior to pry- !entatlon 0 the l1CM'nCta. tlm to be ..ddriueel. Indl,'du" ._or. win bl lmlrid to5 mlnlolteS I)n ~ Item. 'The $tlfe' tlo" Of In Inl:UviduAI to speak on b,half of an grllanlutlor) Of i1roup 15 enl;ouraged. If r.,oo,,- niUI!f by tnl! ch.lr, a Sl)oktsper$on for a grOl.l~ or oralnlutlon may b. allOffed 10 mln~ utes to 5~ta.k on tin _. '.rsol'l.:: wiShing t,' haw wrfft.~ o~ graphH: materhal.. inClltICled ,n the Board _Mila PllCk:. et. mUlt submit said mawrlal .. minimum of 3 we,klll prIor to thl r.- sP.etl~ PUb~r.iIftng. In 8/l'Y eNe. n ma- "';j4t. rmendl:! to be ""'" ....~....... sha' bl! $u miUed to the appropr Cou!'lty $td'. minimum of it\" Ill" da~1 prior tQ th. gUtlllenearlng. All mOl- tr6~~ =rbnt~~=:'~ will "COI'l'lO: . perma. nMt: part; of IM~. An,; ~rson who CI.~id- "'.~"I.d4K:i.i~n .f1'. d will __ . l"COO I) the prc!lMd' inCl$ "rtalnlng thereto __'" _n... to tn.u,. tnat . \'/,rba, til'l'l rtcord oftn. pro. ~~'i'''''-.cJ"yjhlct "dUd.$ tne tes- timony ~~d tvlde"ce tf~:l' c tl'ie .,~.I KYOI.l..,.lptlrsonwttJ't . .".."Ily wh, no,", 8I"S accommodation In arller tf.\f.1) iClpt,b! In this 'IlrO 1,* you .... ontl'l4I h. no .~.". ~~tl'~ :::f;r.~~r PIOU. camaot the COl. lieI' Co~nt~ I'actlltlll!'5 Manalemont c.~.rt- lfltnt. located at nOl ~.roie.ml Tr.1I laJt. ""?i'n!:! w. Nap''', arl ]4U2, (aJI) 25Z- SJiO. .lI.ttttclli3teni"! l:!fil~s for t". tltll'in Impal,.d are i1.v.irGb in t". (:our,ty cammls. iiMll'S' Qil'fteto. BOUD O. ~OUNTV COM..'......!1lS COlLlEIII ~OUNTY. OLOAIDA TOld l1!NNINQ. CIofAIAMAN il'''''' .. 1AOCl<, '~..... ""_,, ~- ~. ,11 No1167&:2S 2392534783 CLASS PAGE 09 178 Teresa L. Polaski ~17B . To: Subject: legals@naplesnews,com A VESMT ,2006-AR-1 0754 Attachments: AVESMT 2006,AR-10754,doc; AVESMT 2006-AR-10754.doc Legals, Please advertise the following on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and again on Sunday, February 17, 2008. Thanks ~ AVESMT AVESMT j-AR'107S4.doc (28 j-AR'10754,doc (28 Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners Minutes and Records Department 239-252-B411 (T eresa.Po las ki@collierclerk.com) 1 178 Teresa L. Polaski From: Sent: To: Subject: postmaster@collierclerk.com Tuesday, February 05, 2008 10:34 AM Teresa L. Polaski Delivery Status Notification (Relay) Attachments: ATT691949,txt; AVESMT-2006,AR,10754 1':1 l;..J B A TT691949. txt A VE5MT ,2006'AR'1 (231 B) 0754 This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. legals@naplesnews.com FW: A VESMT ,2006-AR-l 0754 Page I of 1 17p Teresa L. Polaski From: Perrell, Pam [PPerrell@Naplesnews,com] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 10:51 AM To: Teresa L, Polaski Subject: RE: AVESMT-2006,AR,10754 Yes, they got it. I was out. They tend not to confirm. Sorryl Pam From: Teresa L. Polaski [mailto:Teresa.Polaski@colliercierk.com] Posted At: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:34 AM Posted To: Legals - NDN Conversation: AVESMT-2006-AR'l07S4 Subject: FW: AVESMT-2006'AR-I07S4 Just checking to see if you received this email yesterday.ldid not get an ok on it. Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners Minutes and Records Department 239-252-8411 (T eresa.Po laski@colllerclerk.com) From: Teresa L. Polaski Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 10:34 AM To: 'Iegals@naplesnews.com' Subject: AVESMT-2006'AR'10754 Legals, Please advertise the following on Sunday, February 10, 2008 and again on Sunday, February 17, 2008, Thanks <<AVESMT 2006,AR-10754,doc>> <<AVESMT 2006-AR-10754,doc>> Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners Minutes and Records Department 239-252,8411 (T eresa.Polaskl@collierclerk.com) 2/6/2008 Th.Th, NAPLES DAILY :'IiEWS Published Dati: Naples. FLq 102 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned they' serve as the authority. personally appeared B, Lamb. who on oath says that they serve as the ASSIstant Corporate Secreta", of the Naples Daily. a daily newspaper published at Naples. in Collier County. Florida: dlstrlbuled in Collier and Lee counties of Florida: that the attached copy of the advertising. being a PUBUC NOTICE' in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE was published in said newspaper 1 time in the issue On Februa", 1)"',2008 .\lllant lilrthcr says that th~ said :\'lpks ])ail~- !\cws is a nc\\spap..:r Puhlished at :\apks. in collier county, Florida and Ih<ll the said n..:wspapcr has hcrdofor.:: b':"::11 continuously Pllolishcd in said Colli..::r County. Florida~ distributed in Collier and Lee counti..::s of Florida, .each day and has been entered as s..::cond class mail matter at the post ollie..:: in !\aples, in said Collier Countv, Florida. for a period of 1 :-i.:ar nexl preceding the tirst publication ofthe attached copy or advertisement~ and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any' person, tlrm or corporation any discount, rehate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publieation in the said newspaper Ij.~ ( Signature of a ffia ut) Sworn 10 and subscribed before me This 17t". 200X Da\ Of Fehruary 200R NOTI,C,E OF PUBUC~ N.t1'iI'l.lie,~~, it.." thaI tho __countY commtSislon.... . of. eor. ner countywUl hold a I<llI>t1F~'\l.R r:~' ao,atd'r~"O'". ,3rd Floot;'~dmltlIJt"'ttQT\ sulldlng,COlUer Cou~ . ,331) amI: Na S., flor da.. lite m.', ,,~t~Bt..!!, I> ~d~rtr, ~S:r,+:;' . ~. > OF TtlE tl1:tlto6A\"ol IL,LI' ~OUNTY. , R/OAr TING TO . ITlON A MToltW. AR-10754., DISCLAIMING. RENOUNCtNQAHO VA. CAT'IN(; T-ME'CQUNTY'S A,Y-D'lHE" pYBUC'S . tN- TERUT iN A 2:5 FOOT WIDE'DRAINAGE EASE- ': tI OV ~^T~E S~TH IN It~ 'NO WEST 114,01' TIlE SOUTHWlSTiBlI4 F SEC. TlON 2" T .,' tp 48 ~' ,EAST. o " , ATED " . OFf'I- CI L RECORD BOOK 26t!. PAGES321S AND gg~tNTHE !i,IC RE- C OS OF 0 lIER U "FLORID. AND NOW ,URTHER DE. SamlBD IN THE AT- T'.' '~EHI"IT 'A', I. 'C, lNO A lIE' P 'Ad DRAlNAOE EAS . ENT ALSO SHOWN ON tHE AT. TAQ4t!D EXHIBIT . A', IN ~.TIIE VACATED No.T!: All persons INlshilHllQ .poal< on any aeon<!( 11Im must reg", , ter with the County. Ad. _Istrator friar to pre- sentation 0 theage(\da He!J"'I1l , "", 'fit.. ,d. 1i'1a1.V'''' $p. .'.' win 1 bi- Ifrnttld . to' minutes "OII""X_ -, 'tJon Of. an IAdtvldua' to speak on, behalf of an ~"5..IS '. . ". . ' . . J, r:ecoa- ~~~~. ~'.' l.SPOk...er:$,On for a aroup,' . or organl14tlon may 'oe allotted 10 mIn- utes to s'Peak on an tl'I'l.,"~-,,,,,,,,,,.~_ C.\ \~ \\.1 I; CUI \ ~~~ 0..( C ,,,-, "ifr';:/iJ'-..- CHANEL A. MCDONALD (Slgnalure of notary publIc) f.,W' ,~.\ Commission,DD650475 ~. ' ..! Expires June 29 2011 Rr:1't\{' &ndedThruTroYFal~lrHI~rilfIQRllQP-3Bi-701g FEt 59-257RJ27 17B p.r.ono wr....~!i.' have written C)I" . t materlaJi1!'~1 fe. ,n .the IIOlInJ a - eumu.t S bmtt ..:ld mattriaI a minimum Of 3 Wjeks PriM to the .'~~ ItYl\lUbll<heaet!, m,lal,', n'3.1'r. . ~.Id' y."" Bo ;' 11'" ulftnttted . ~,. . ~'I..ec.un~ i1lJtfa ml~ of leV- _~~pays -prior to the IWtlc'heaWnQ.' All ma- , erlalused in presenta- tions 4:lefofe. the 'Board will become a perma- nent p~ 01 ~ ,..cord, A'n!t:,.,' etson WhOr!1', . d- estQ~ a . Ion of the . .wll need a record of t e proceed- Ings t~ ~ai,n. thereto and- ...,..... to en.ure , t Ii verta~ tlm r.~rit of the pro- ceedings 'I made whlch record Inc udes the te,- tlmony and. evl,dence uJl'on which- the appeal Is based. ' II you .... . po",," with a disability who needs any accommodation In order to participate In this pro:ce8dlngi yOu ,are entitled; at Rocost to yO~,' to ttw prQvlslon of certain. autstance. Please contaCttbeCol~ lIer County FaclHtles Management Depart- ment. lc:aca.te.d ,t 3301 Tamlaml Trait .East, BUlldln., W. ~'91... FlortdaMll2; (~'252- 8380. Asslsted Ustenlng devlce!iJor .the hearlog Impalre . .1Ift: Bv'lIable In the eouftW.CG,"",ls. sloners'i)fttCt. BOAR,D OF. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. . COLLI ~RC:O,tJ,HTY ,I FI..aRIDA TOM HEttNING, '. I CHAIRMAN DIYtGHTE. BROCll; CLlRk By'T......PoI...' ..f;.'ji.., ($ AL '" t:eb. 10, 17 No 1661825 ,t - ,': ,:,,;;<:~ - :~,', "',:: ", ,~:]f. ,,_ '~;-'-~__~j)'Flf;\~f;::.t'~ .''''\:," ",,_ ,'(- .,:.,',' l' ',,' ~ ,,,,,. "~ _ """" 'i'>~"r"c "<",', d. "-,,:,,\,'i. '5'1,'" c.~~',' ;'f~~ - ;'", ~ ,"'I q,,- 2/' , '. 3. i' 4! '"t' i c_" i:., ;('f/l/ :~~-'.-;, """':-'-"', " " . :4\<1:" ",t-'~'",' "gt" , , ;; ,N/A is not , "": _" "C-. "~.,, , ". lin~ 6. " ..~ 1 .' ~ "A 'y' -':".,-, "" , ~'~i<"'\~~~-':-~-;l?,:~ '., '~\~ _.r?!il~~i"~.,\,,&,_~~,~k-';lH.-~~ " ., " IllU "j"lIII"llni1l/~Oli_1)J IIi, I I! , il~.~.u9 6* 'Sed 26lrs ~ re(t2~~u """'-;-+,>fi!."'''''''l;",;~.,.,',~'-'/j,:,,~ .1lII._. ....____....... m, ,~VI 'I. "Rev. ."" ' .,.'~',1"'-X-.i--\';--i!l',:'1..-1;~~'-',~ ',''''lIl-,.(;'':''j, ,"c- "''-'~~~~)l#_~'''}*~N'I'Ii'~~_:~~lb!''~It_~.f~,,*%..~-\.:,~,;;t' :~M~jt~,\"'1t_ Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 4135616 OR: 4335 PG: 2143 RBCORDBD in the OPPICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, PL 03/04/2008 at 03:12PM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLBRK RBC PBB coms 27.00 3.00 RESOLUTION NO. 08-~ l?B A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PETITION AVESMT-2006-AR-10754, DISCLAIMING, RENOUNCING AND VACATING THE COUNTY'S AND THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN A 25 FOOT WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER THE SOUTH AND EAST 25 FEET OF THE NORTH 'j, OF THE NORTHWEST Y. OF THE NORTHWEST Y. OF THE SOUTHWEST Y. OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, ORIGINALLY CREATED AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 2693 PAGES 3215 AND 3216, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND NOW FURTHER DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 'A', AND ACCEPTING A REPLACEMENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT, ALSO SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 'A', IN PLACE OF THE VACATED EASEMENT, WHEREAS. pursuant to Section 125.01 and 125.37. Florida Statutes, Petitioner, La Playa Golf Club, LLC. has requested the vacation of a 25 foot wide drainage easement over the south and east 25 feet of the north Y, of the northwest Y. of the northwest Y. of the southwest Y. of Section 24. Township 48 South, Range 25 East having been originally created and recorded in the Official Record Book 2693 pages 3215 and 3216 of the Public Records Collier County, Florida. and depicted in Exhibit 'A'; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with, and as part of Petitioner's request, Petitioner has offered for dedication an alternate 20 foot wide drainage easement as a replacement easement, attached hereto and also depicted in Exhibit 'A', in place of the vacated easement; and WHEREAS, the Board has this day held a public hearing to consider the Petitioner's request, and notice of said public hearing to vacate was given as required by law; and WHEREAS, the granting of the Petitioner's request will not adversely affect the ownership or right of convenient access of the property owners; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the County's interest in the 25 foot drainage easement as specifically described in Exhibit 'A' is hereby vacated, extinguished, renounced and disclaimed, and this action is declared to be in the Public's interest and for the Public's benefit. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County hereby accepts the dedication of the replacement drainage easement attached hereto and shown on Exhibit 'A'. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Clerk to the Board is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same, this O1(,iJI day of rdJrlkAry ,2008. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ERK, ~ . t,.... I By: TOM HENNING, Approved as to form and legal sufficie 0""1'11"'")> "0)>)>< <D~' (1" m ..C1lj=I"'"CJl ......!:l.-)>;s: """-1-<-1 t:3N-<)> I ......0 "" _0 G)O 0", 00 .....0 en ~ 1"'"' o "1'1)> o ;s:;o CO )>.:.. o _0 Z..... -I'" m~ Z )>;0 Zm (1< m" "" o c: m ...... - to - o CO !/) > '~ ~ ..~ 3:t\ ,~ Ij~ ,Ii III III o "i 0:1 ~ '" ~ Cll I '" '" I o ., I I '" ~ "'1; <;> ~;: '" <;>"" "" "'... ~ ~~ ~ "'a ~ ~O:I ~"" ~ ~~ I&: 021 1&:", ~ - '" ",0 - 021 .... -m o ~P:- ~ """,2.: - ,"0 -0:1 ;j ~ 0:1 :il ~ '" ~8. 0:1 ~ '" - o 21 ~ ~ I ~ o I o '" VI '" '" d o ..: '" . ~ 0; ~ '" .5 1 I 1 I -HDJ'TlN 00>(11 mO~..." JT1"':ii::8 <~~-1 ~u)-1o ,..J.-'>:::tI rrl"'OVl~ o>""Uz <>"," JT1:::t1~ "'0 "'. -;0 "', 50' DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND UTILITY EASEMENT (NOO'08'38'W) (330.42') ~ - ?L OR: 4335 PG: 2144 CYPRESS WAY "U ;:0 o "U o (J) [Tl o N o o ;:0 )> z )> C) [Tl [Tl )> (J) [Tl :;;: [Tl Z -l 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I -I I 1 1 (J)OZ 0'10 C :;;0 -l-l-l III ::.EfTl fTl ~ (J) -l Z" ON :;;0 ~-l0 "I'1 -1'-~-l O(J)I '1-lfTl (J)~Z fTl"O 0-1'-:;;0 -l -l OOI z'1::.E -lfTl NI(J) -1'-fTl-l I -1'- OJ I N (Jl ~ " -1'- -HIIJT1J\) 08l:i'" mJ'\~b <",,)/'.,0 >cnZ-I otO-Io >,!.H>::o r;.l"'C(J)~ 0>""lJ)>- <>",~ JT1;;cj:!r1 "'0 ",. -;0 ",. - z '" '" 01 '" ,,; '" . B 0; 0> '" to '" ....; I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 L___________L_________________________~- I 1 "' '" " "'to:l ~ g N~. ~... '" I () ""'''' ~ .. t::::II ==It:: ." .. b>~ :z: iii =i ~ (SOO'05'38'E) (330.86') B / / ,al- e"! ." ;:gil ~~ ~'~ VlC")". ",,,, " ",,. ZZ -<0 15' ORAINAGE ANO LANOSCAPE EASEMENT *** OR: 4335 PG: 2145 *** '" '" '" '" :; :; '" '" ::; ::; (j)O 0..... "o}> Z Z co "I Oor Ol ~ G) "(J}> mz '" rrr ~ C ::OG) c...... ..... rr I I -< oz "'}> IZ 0-..... l\) "0 0- "'0 :E"'I co ~ .....~ (j)::O}> I 0 :u "'r z~ 0 I (j)- .....z " o-l 0 ..., 0 }> "'m 0G) OI O"(J '" '" 0 o}> ::0'" c}> (j) }> Z::o "';:;: .....::0 Z::o 0 I Ir ::0 <"l ;;:: }>m }>. :E-< .......... <"lE; (j) r", (j)'" c< "(J ~ ::0 "'.. "'", 0 :::J ~~ ~_.,- .._-~.._,-_._------..:;.:.:: os::'" (j)o "" 0 :1>- "'(j) ...... r c;l ,"Z _0 O(j) Z '" c;l ZO Zo ,,0 ::0'" " .....c 0 "''' '" (j)}> .." -0 ~ "'" ",m 0..... " '" ::0::0 }>::O 0r:1 }>- ",<"l 0 "(J '" >-'" (j)C z'" "..... mZ ::0 a:: "'- Z 0" '" 0 '" ",'" "(JO ::0'" .....0 -'" "(J a::::l r}> I" Z.. Z "'0 }>G) ",'" '" G). 0 .., ZZ Z'" (j)..... ..... (j) os::..... '" ;;1 ..., Z .....0 (j)I 0 0 "'- ~" 0", 00 0 ;;1"" :u ::oZ 0 C ::o:E 0 a:: (j)(") .....r .....Z ",Z ::0 0< !fl -}> IO (j) ~ a::>- os:: }> Oz :E::O "(JI :!': <"l "! ~~ Z Zo "'..... }>- Z 0 (j) (j)I ::o"(J }> ..., .. 0;;:: ..... :::J.. G) 0 ...," '-' r OOJ '" '" }> ,,0 -" l\) 01;' 0 Z ::0 "'" C '" ::0'" r(j) q 0 .. }>O }> ~'" '" O~ "'''' 00 ::oC (j) 'a:: (j) 0::0 r..... '" C " -<.I os:: '" ::0 ::Or ..... '" Z (j)I .., < 0", :!':'" 0::0 Z '" (j) "'}> ..... -< Y' Oz ~Z 0 (j)0 ::0 ::OG) (j) ",::0 co'" 0..... .....I "'N -:E 0," 0", Z(j) }>", "'..... (j)}> :"'- (j) " ...... .. (j).......... ",II 0"'''' ~ZfT1 GO}> Z::O(j) "'.......... ..IN ~ . :E '" 0 ~ i ~ "tI ......... ... - -d:ri (:) '" ~ 0 = d......... !;; ~ 0.....0 (j) (") ~ .... ......... ~ ~-" 0 "g ~ ......... ..., ::0 ~ li~....~ 0 (j)" '" "(J " ~ g g... "" I"'" :::J ~r;;~~ ~ - ..... 0 '" "(JO '" ,,}> Z &',,~" c:: I:Il 0 <"l .. Z 0 ~~ ;-l!9. Z t3:j t:: ::l... ~ OO:to ~" &~ g ~ t::1 ~ 0'" (j)"'..... 00 zo'" '1:1 o I 0.... ~ > l':' <"ll\)~[::j ~ CZ'" ::0::0 1:1 f~' !:Ii OI/lo.CI.J~ Z .....0 ",}> f~g"d ~ E' "'<"l .I ::::0 U1 "'2' '.ooIli'!i! ..,":z: 0 .....0 <O}> !D~[ S ' ~~N> ..., ::oIC Y'G) }>:E..... '" ~..[ . n ~Z c;') Z",I "(J !~ !l OOOt;lt:::l > C)~N G)'" d=~" 0 '" '" }> ~".... t"" '-'(j) z... '" [fJ N":::'O "'''' ..go!; - :;l..~~ "'l c::: -os:: . . ,"..0 II~", " . Ol '" ~ '"'" o '" "" c;lt;; n fTlO" ~Z l;l~~ . ..."'''' t"" <: }>,,'" ..... :"'.. t: og~::l c::: trl (j) '" - in :-!-t-l ..... "':;j 0 -<: 0 s z to IO . O''(j >- "'0 0"''' m ;!' ~ " ~ Q. ..~"" t"" O(j)..... '" m je;! 0 () 0 ~~ t"" rOI < >< "Il~~" <0 e. ~ n C:CfT1 0 " }> :I: ~ 0.' "'..... 0 ~ g ~ ""~ .. c;l ::oIz }> - n.. I '" :Eo ..... t-iID irii'ii 0 " 0 0"'::0 '" 'lDCOID c;l '" '" l\) O(j)..... 0 ~=i "-IQiI 0 q '" C.....I "" 0 J..,z!Sca '" '" z_ I I I 1 >- ....." I ~WWN ~~M '" ~-< ~ F: ~~o ..., CIl......W "0" - ~'" '0 r"o " "'''' " o " "II> <;;' ~ "- ~o ~I ~ 0 - ?> ""'" "t::f~ ... MEMORANDUM Date: March 4, 2008 To: Stephen Higgins Engineering Services Department From: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Drainage Easement: La Playa Golf Club, LLC Enclosed please find an original of the documents, as referenced above, (Agenda Item #17B), adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2008. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 252-8411. Thank you. Enclosure 178 178 I~ This instrument prepared by: G. Helen Athan, Esq. Grant, Fridkin, Pearson, Athan & Crown, P .A. 5551 Rldgewood Drive, Suite 501 Naples, FL 34108 239-514,1000 AVESMT-2006-AR-10754 REV: 2 LAPLAYA GOLF MAINTENANCE FACILITY Project: 2005040080 DUE: 1/9/08 Date: 12/21/07 Project: PARCEL: Folio No.: DRAINAGE EASEMENT tt- 1\ THI~ I;:ASEMENT, made and entered into this / J- day of I~ , 2007, by LAPLAYA GOLF CLUB, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, whose mailing address is 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL 34105, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor"), to COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112 (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"). (Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as the context requires,) WIT N E SSE T H: Grantor, for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and sells unto the Grantee, a perpetual, exclusive drainage easement to enter upon and to install and maintain drainage structures and facilities, including but not limited to underground pipes, and various types of water control structures under, upon and across the following described lands located in Collier County, Florida, to wit: See attached Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein by reference. Subject to easements, restrictions, and reseNations of record. THIS IS NOT HOMESTEAD PROPERTY TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee together with the right to enter upon said land and to place and/or excavate materials for the purpose of 178 constructing, operating, and maintaining drainage facilities thereon. The easement granted herein shall constitute an easement running with the land and shall burden the lands described above. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Grantor, for itself and its successors and/or assigns, does hereby reserve the right to use said easement area for the following purposes: (a) drainage of storm water from land owned by Grantor, which land is adjacent to said easement area, and (b) a water management berm, back yard swales and landscaping. Grantor acknowledges that it shall install root barriers for any plants within 10 feet of any pipes in said easement area and that Grantor shall be liable for and replace any improvements which Grantor has placed in said easement area and which may be damaged by the Grantee in exercising its rights hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. WITNESSES: LAPLAYA GOLF CLUB, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company THE HALSTATT PARTNERSHIP, a Florida General Partnership, as Managing Member By: Katherine G. Sproul and Jennifer S. Sullivan, as Trustees of the JULIET C. SPROUL TRUST under the Will of BARRON COLLIER, JR., Deceased, and as confirmed by change of Trustees dated January 1, 2002 and filed March 5, 2002, in Official Records Book 2992, Page 2016 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, PARTNER C1 ~~ UJ1fttv CAROLYN A SHAW Print Name of Witness >/)~d --:Zlt'/?" )' It. /1/ "-;) . , " -" , l..Rt,,- \ ".le-lo:7 ;:',..re Print Name of Witness ustee CJ{).J\.i' ~~ U 11 L~v CAROLYN A. SHAW Print Name of W'mjess ??a C/ \1./) ( ,,- f?:L, ':y .,,-u ~l(d{ -:Y'~('Cl1'Jrl Z.ch' Print Name of Witness 178 STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF COLLIER) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I ::z.~ day of M ~ 2007, by Katherine G, Sproul, as Trustee of the Juliet C. Sproul Trust under the Will of Barron Collier, Jr., Deceased, and as confirmed by change of Trustees dated January 1, 2002 and filed March 5, 2002, in O.R. Book 2992, Page 2016 of the P.R. of Collier County, Florida, as a general partner of Halstatt Partnership, as a Managing Member of LaPlaya Golf Club, LLC, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. ~{(~ Notary Public SUSAN L. MATURO Print Name: My Commission Expires: I 0 - It; ~ 0 8 i,J#I ~ Suun l MallKO . " . My COmmlSSI()Il 003043616 "\'--:,1 !'"~pires October 15. 2008 STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF COLLIER) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / i{, tt- day of /J.R ~ 2007, by Jennifer S. Sullivan, as Trustee of the Juliet C. Sproul Trust under the Will of Barron Collier, Jr., Deceased, and as confirmed by change of Trustees dated January 1, 2002 and filed March 5, 2002, in OR Book 2992, Page 2016 of the P.R. of Collier County, Florida, as a general partner of Halstatt Partnership, as a Managing Member of LaPlaya Golf Club, LLC, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification.' _ ~ 'l/h,~ Notary Public SUSAN L. MATURO Print Name: My Commission Expires: ({) - (S -0 S ..,.,., ~ 50un L Maturo 1 ~ .; My CommiSSIOn 003043616 "?o,"'~ ExpIres October 15, 2008 178 o f)fl otJ.v t(. vU <U/ CAROLVNA. SHAW Print Name of Witness i)~~~ .~, ',' .'Vv , ')')(':j~:' i ~:, 1 ~) Print Name of Witness STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF COLLIER) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged t>efore me this I;;. jlZ.-day of ~ 2007, t>y Paul J. Marinelli, Chief Executive Officer of The Halstatt Partnership, as a Managing Memt>er of LaPlaya Golf Clut>, LLC, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification, - _ 4~.~ Notary Put>lic SUSAN L. MATURO Print Name: My Commission Expires: 10 -I S--O S ~"~ Susan l Maturo ~ ~ ~ My CommissIOn 00343616 ~'t 0"..01 Ex.plres October 15, 2008 178 Q~a,A{~ LAPLAYA GOLF CLUB, LLC, a Delaware limited liability mpany / / CAROLYN A. SHAW Print Name of Witness .," -~ ' :f::'< -:-1 J... ,....h 1.., /" "'j ".? , . r:., ,,),., I .,' 1. +, ,-._l"<:;._ t ,)', i"; __~ , Print Name of Witness By: STATE OF Ft. COUNTY OF Cbw...,I:ffl..) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this !.2."f'lday of ~, 2007, by Stephen J. Lockwood, as a Managing Member of LaPlaya Golf Club, LLC, who is personally known to me or who has produced as;;J::: t. ~ Notary Public .' n Print Name: ',,/SAN L. MATURO My Commission Expires: It> -IS -Cl~ J'q1-'f ~ Susan l M8tlKO . ~ . My CommiSsIOn 003<43616 ~~,,..,/ Expires October 15. 2008 LAPLAYA GOLF CLUB, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ()~ U.:AiiLY- By: Stephen J. Lockwood & Company LLC As A Managing Me r CAROLYN A. SHAW Print Name of Witness ?;i'~ . . ' ~ '*" ~ .Jr"'j>~ J,(,' 0' 7 \ '1' (J"fu(l --;&tu Print Name of Witness STATE OF ft.. ) COUNTY OF r",-uE1t.. ) 'Ii The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of ~ 2007, by Stephen J. Lockwood, as Managing Member of Stephen J. Lockwood & Company LLC, as a Managing Member of LaPlaya Golf Club, LLC, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. ~t.~ :P~ ~ Suun l Malul'O ~ ~ . My Comm.SSlOI1 00343816 .,.,. "".../ Expires October 15. 2008 Notary Public . Print Name: SUSAN L. MATURO My Commission Expires: 10- I s~o8 Acceptance by Grantee: ATTEST: DWIGHT E, BROCK, Clerk . ,j" ~~'IM@',k Qeputy Gle.rk " ~t"S\ nto(CN 1,... . S19lt.tjirJ. ,MI. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: By: J ight As i tant County Attorney 178 4" BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA