HEX Final Decision #2026-30Page 1 of 7
HEX NO. 2026-30
HEARING EXAMINER DECISION
DATE OF HEARING.
April 9, 2026
PETITION.
Petition No. BD-PL20250006008 Kapusta Dock - 737 Palm Point Drive - Request for a 5-foot
boat dock extension, over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier
County Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways 100 feet or greater in width, to construct a
new dock facility that will protrude a total of 25 feet into a waterway that is 345± feet wide, for
the benefit of the subject property.
GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION.
The proposed facility is a 4-foot-wide access or gangway leading to a 4- to 6-foot-wide shore
parallel dock with a single slip, including a 12-foot by 12-foot boat lift for a 32-foot vessel.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
Approval with conditions.
FINDINGS.
1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87(4) of the
Collier County Code of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter
9 of the County Administrative Code.
2. The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all
County and state requirements.
3. The public hearing was conducted electronically and in-person in accordance with
Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04.
4. The public hearing was conducted in the following manner: the County Staff presented the
Petition followed by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner’s representative, public comment and then
rebuttal by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner’s representative. There were no objections at the
public hearing.
5. The Hearing Examiner disclosed having reviewed the record for the petition and having no ex
parte communications.
Page 2 of 7
6. In accordance with LDC Section 5.03.06.H., the Collier County Hearing Examiner shall
approve, approve with conditions, or deny a dock facility extension request based on certain
criteria. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve this request, at least four of the five
primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria must be met.1
Primary Criteria:
1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate
in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the
subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier
islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the
property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be
no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling
unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be
appropriate.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The subject property is zoned for a single-
family residential unit, which warrants no more than 2 slips per CC-LDC. The
proposed docking facility consists of installing one boatlift to accommodate a 40-foot
LOA vessel.” Zoning staff concurred.
2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the
general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner’s application is
unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner’s application
and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching
and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The applicant’s agent stated: The boat dock extension is necessary to
accommodate the owners’ vessel, as the existing shoreline consists of a tall riprap bank
that is being refurbished. The waterway is also classified as an aquatic preserve, and
any proposed dock can only extend out 25-feet or to -4’ MLW contour line. As
proposed, the dock and associated boatlift will extend out to the 25-foot mark, with
most of the actual dock being over the base of the rip-rap shoreline, which only allows
the boatlift and BD-PL20250006008 – 737 Palm Point Drive Page 5 of 7 March 17,
2026 associated vessels to barely reach adequate water depths. Based on this, the water
depths are too shallow within the allowed 20 feet, but the main driving factor is the rip-
rap shoreline not allowing the dock to be constructed any further landward.” Based
upon Attachment B, Cross Sections AA, Zoning staff concurred.
3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation
within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not
1 The Hearing Examiner’s findings are italicized.
Page 3 of 7
intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic
in the channel.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The proposed docking facility will be
constructed on a natural waterway that is open for navigation in this area from
shoreline to shoreline. The waterway width is approximately 345-feet from MHWL to
MHWL, and, as proposed, the dock will not protrude more than 25-feet from that line,
or approximately 8%, which is well within the allowed 25%. Based on this, it is our
opinion that the dock will have no impact to the existing navigation situation on the
subject waterway.” Zoning staff concurred.
4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the
width of the waterway and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway
width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The
facility should maintain the required percentages.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The approximate waterway varies from
the east side of the proposed dock being approximately 345-feet wide. The proposed
dock protrusion is 25-feet which is 8% width of the waterway.” Zoning staff noted that
there is no dock facility on the opposite shoreline; thus, the distance between the subject
dock and the opposite MHWL is 323 feet.
5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the
facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should
not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The proposed docking facility design and
slip layout have taken each existing and potential future adjacent docking facility into
consideration to avoid any potential impacts. As proposed, we are confident that there
will be no new impacts on neighboring docks or on their existing ingress/egress to their
slips/boatlifts. Additionally, as proposed, the dock will provide much larger setbacks
from the riparian lines than the required 15 feet.” Zoning staff concurred.
Secondary Criteria:
1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the
subject property or waterway, that justify the proposed dimensions and location
of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related
to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline
configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
been met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The subject property shoreline consists of a
Page 4 of 7
riprap shoreline with a high elevation, which increases the overall length of the bank
to maintain a 2:1 slope. This special existing on-site condition, which was taken into
consideration when designing the proposed dock, due to the access walkway and
associated boatlifts needing to extend out past to reach the allowed 25-foot mark as
well as adequate water depths.” Zoning staff concurred.
2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the
vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive
deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use
excessive deck area.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The proposed docking facility has been
fully minimized as much as possible and still provides sufficient deck area for routine
maintenance and safe access. Additionally, the dock and associated deck area will also
provide sufficient deck space for recreational activities like fishing. The total over-
water square footage is 272 square feet.” Zoning staff concurred.
3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel or vessels in
combination described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject
property’s linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage
should be maintained.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The existing docking facility has been
designed to moor one vessel, being approximately 32-feet in length. The subject
property’s shoreline length is approximately 145-feet and therefore this criterion is
met.” Zoning staff concurred.
4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view
of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on
the view of a neighboring property owner.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The existing on-site conditions consist of
riprap and a heavily vegetated natural mangrove shoreline. As such, both adjacent
neighboring properties have docks or will have docks, being consistent with the other
properties in this area. Additionally, as proposed, the dock has been designed to be
constructed well within the designated setbacks and to have limited overall protrusion
into the waterway. Based on this, it is our opinion that there are no new impacts to
either adjacent property owner.” Zoning staff concurred.
5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass
beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.J of the LDC must be
demonstrated.)
Page 5 of 7
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The submerged resources survey provided indicates that no seagrass
beds exist within 200 feet of the proposed dock. No seagrass beds will be impacted by
the proposed dock facility.
6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection
requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance
with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
is not applicable. LDC Section 5.03.06.E.11 stipulates that “multi-slip docking
facilities with 10 or more slips will be reviewed for consistency with the Manatee
Protection Plan (MPP).” The proposed project is for a private single slip docking
facility accessory to a single-family residence in Goodland. The proposed facility does
not have more than 10 slips and so is not subject to review for consistency with the
MPP.
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION.
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that Environmental Planning
Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. The proposed
docking facilities will be constructed waterward of the existing rip-rapped shoreline in Blue Hill
Creek. The applicant's submerged resources survey found no submerged resources in the area;
Exhibit sheet page 10 of 10 shows an aerial photo with a note stating that no seagrasses were
observed within 200 feet. The proposed docking facility will be placed in the ACSC/ST Overlay
(Area of State Critical State Concern/Special Treatment). An ST permit will be required prior to
approval of the building permit for the proposed docking facility.
This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review because it does
not fall within the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2,
Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances.
ANALYSIS.
The subject waterfront property comprises 0.39 acres, located within a Village Residential (VR)
Zoning District and the Goodland Zoning Overlay (GZO), upon which a single-family residence
is presently under construction, per Building Permit No. PRFH20240730400, issued on July 9,
2025. The property has 133 feet of waterfrontage on Blue Hill Creek, a natural waterway that is
part of the Rookery Bay Aquatic Preserve on the SW side of Goodland. The shoreline consists of
a newly refurbished rip-rap bank; the previously existing mangroves have been fully removed.
Proposed is a 4-foot-wide access or gangway leading to a 4- to 6-foot-wide shore parallel dock
with a single slip, including a 12-foot by 12-foot boat lift for a 32-foot vessel. The required 15-
foot side/riparian setbacks are satisfied on both sides of the dock facility.
The Hearing Examiner concludes that there is enough competent, substantial evidence based on
the review of the record that includes the Petition, application, exhibits, the County’s staff report,
Page 6 of 7
and comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or their representative(s), County staff and
anyone from the public, to approve the Petition for the boat dock. The boat dock petition meets 5
of the 5 primary criteria and 5 of the 6 secondary criteria with one criterion being not applicable.
The criteria are set forth in Section 5.03.06.H of the Land Development Code.
DECISION.
The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition Number BD-PL20250006008, filed by Jeff
Rogers of Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc., representing the owner/applicant Steven D. Kapusta
Living Trust and Brandy L. Kapusta Living Trust, with respect to the property described as located
at 737 Palm Point Drive, AKA: Lot 2, Goodland Shores, in Section 18, Township 52 South, Range
27 East, Collier County, Florida, for the following:
• To allow a 5-foot boat dock extension over the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet
allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for
waterways 100 feet or greater in width, to allow a new boat docking facility protruding a
total of 25 feet into a waterway that is 345± feet wide, for the benefit of the subject property.
Said changes are fully described in the Proposed Dock and Related Plans attached as Exhibit "A"
and the Record Survey attached as Exhibit “B”, and are subject to the condition(s) set forth below.
ATTACHMENTS.
Exhibit A – Proposed Dock and Related Plans
Exhibit B – Record Survey
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
The subject property is located at 737 Palm Point Drive, AKA: Lot 2, Goodland Shores, in Section
18, Township 52 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida.
CONDITIONS.
All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the
development.
DISCLAIMER.
Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any
way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency
and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant
fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or
undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.
Page 7 of 7
APPEALS.
This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done
in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES
AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR
VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE
NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
April 23, 2026
Date Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP
Hearing Examiner
EXHIBIT “A”
STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 25.920918<> LONGITUDE:W -81.647279SITE ADDRESS:<> 737 PALM POINT DRGOODLAND, FL 34140Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-SOUTH_737LOT.dwg LOCATION MAP 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827737 PALM POINT DRLOCATION MAP52-------------------01 OF 10COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF AMERICA8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY
p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-SOUTH_737LOT.dwg 1/23/2026NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-SOUTH_737LOT.dwg 1952 AERIAL 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827737 PALM POINT DR1952 AERIAL52-------------------02 OF 10PROPERTY BOUNDARY·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC."11-06-25-1.86'+0.54'133'0345'BLUE HILL CREEK
-3.84-4.64-4.44-4
.
5
4
-
4
.
8
4
-
4
.
4
4 -4.14-
4
.
2
4
-
4
.
5
4
-5.34 -5.24 -1.94-1.64
-1
.
8
4
-
1
.
4
4
-2
.
6
4
-2.34-
3
.
1
4
-2.74-3.44-3.14-
3
.
0
4 -0.34-0.4-0.14-0.04-0.34-0.74-0.644.14.10.7-0.84.94.23.31.90.6-1.0-2.25.03.52.10.4-2.34.42.61.1-2.54.93.52.3-0.2-2.45.13.92.40.9-0.9-2.14.93.21.7-0.1-2.64.83.51.40.5-0.5-2.04.94.53.63.01.6-0.3-1.95.14.73.52.01.0-1.4-1.94.52.81.7-0.2-1.6-1.5-1.8p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-SOUTH_737LOT.dwg 1/23/2026NESW0204080SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-SOUTH_737LOT.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827737 PALM POINT DREXISTING CONDITIONS52-------------------03 OF 10PALM POINT DRPROPERTY BOUNDARYMHWLRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINE·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC."11-06-25-1.86'+0.54'133'0345'MANGROVES HAVE BEENREMOVED21'81'14
0
'112'SITE ADDRESS:,737 PALM POINT DRGOODLANDFL34140BLUE HILL CREEKEXISTING RIPRAP6'
6'
7'
6'
4.14.10.7-0.84.94.23.31.90.6-1.0-2.25.03.52.10.4-2.34.42.61.1-2.54.93.52.3-0.2-2.45.13.92.40.9-0.9-2.1NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-SOUTH_737LOT.dwg PROPOSED DOCK-DIMENSIONS 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827737 PALM POINT DRPROPOSED DOCK-DIMENSIONS52-------------------04 OF 10·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:"COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC."11-06-25-1.86'+0.54'133'0345'27727725'PROPERTYBOUNDARYMANGROVES HAVE BEEN REMOVEDMHWLFIXED DOCK12'X12' BOATLIFTRIPARIAN LINE25' OFFSET FROM MHWL4'AA0610
'
1
0
'BLUE HILL CREEKPROPOSEDRAIL (26 LF)27'RIPRAP20
'
16
'50'21'6'
4'
25
'32'25'59'RIPARIAN LINE
-3.84-4.64-4.44-4.54-4.84-4.44-4.14-
4
.
2
4
-4.54 -5.34-1.64-1.84-1.44-
2
.
6
4
-
2
.
3
4
-3.14-2.74-3.44-3.14-3.04-0.34-0.4-0.14-0.04-0.34-0.744.14.10.7-0.84.94.23.31.90.6-1.0-2.25.03.52.10.4-2.34.42.61.1-2.54.93.52.3-0.2-2.45.13.92.40.9-0.9-2.1NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETRIPARIAN LINETurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-SOUTH_737LOT.dwg PROPOSED DOCK-DEPTHS 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827737 PALM POINT DRPROPOSED DOCK-DEPTHS52-------------------05 OF 10PROPERTYBOUNDARYMANGROVES HAVE BEEN REMOVEDMHWLRIPARIAN LINEFIXED DOCK12'X12' BOATLIFT25' OFFSET FROM MHWLBLUE HILL CREEKRIPRAPPROPOSEDRAIL·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:"COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC."11-06-25-1.86'+0.54'133'0345'27727725'
-4.84-3.4403612SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-SOUTH_737LOT.dwg CROSS SECTION AA 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827737 PALM POINT DRCROSS SECTION AA52-------------------06 OF 10BLUEHILLCREEKFIXEDACCESSDOCKMHW = +0.54' NAVD88MLW =-1.86' NAVD88ALL PILES TO BE WRAPPEDFROM 12" ABOVE MHWL TO6" BELOW SUBSTRATEFIXEDDOCK12' BOATLIFTMANGROVES HAVEBEEN REMOVED5'25' PROTRUSION FROM MHWLWOODEN BORDER PLACEDAT ELEV= 5.5' NAVD88STAIRSEXISTING RIPRAPPROPERTY LINE
4.14.10.7-0.84.94.23.31.90.6-1.0-2.25.03.52.10.4-2.34.42.61.1-2.54.93.52.3-0.2-2.45.13.92.40.9-0.9-2.14.93.21.7-0.1-2.64.83.51.40.5-0.5-2.04.94.53.63.01.6-0.3-1.95.14.73.52.01.0-1.4-1.94.
52.81.7-0.2-1.6-1.5-1.8NESW02550100SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-SOUTH_737LOT.dwg ST OVERLAY MAP 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827737 PALM POINT DRST OVERLAY MAP52-------------------07 OF 10PROPERTYBOUNDARYFIXED DOCKBLUE HILL CREEKPALM POINT DRST OVERLAY
4.14.10.7-0.84.94.23.31.90.6-1.0-2.25.03.52.10.4-2.34.42.61.1-2.54.93.52.3-0.2-2.45.13.92.40.9-0.9-2.14.
93.21.7-0.1-2.64.83.51.40.5-0.5-2.04.94.53.63.01.6-0.3-1.95.14.73.52.01.0-1.4-1.94.5
2.
81.7-0.2-1.6-1.5-1.8NESW060120240SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-SOUTH_737LOT.dwg ADJACENT DOCKS 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827737 PALM POINT DRADJACENT DOCKS52-------------------08 OF 10PROPERTYBOUNDARYBLUE HILL CREEKPALM POINT DR65'30'55'28'18'10'34'4'42'21
'38'20'71'47'27'14'17'18'19'25'22'
34'
31'
35'
35'
2
5
'
2
5
'
NESW050100200SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-SOUTH_737LOT.dwg WIDTH OF WATERWAY 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827737 PALM POINT DRWIDTH OF WATERWAY52-------------------09 OF 10PROPERTYBOUNDARYBLUE HILL CREEK34
5
'PALM POINT DR32
3
'
4.14.10.7-0.84.94.23.31.90.6-1.0-2.25.03.52.10.4-2.34.42.61.1-2.54.93.52.3-0.2-2.45.13.92.40.9-0.9-2.14.
93.21.7-0.1-2.64.
83.51.40.5-0.5-2.0NESW02550100SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-SOUTH_737LOT.dwg SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827737 PALM POINT DRSUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY52-------------------10 OF 10PROPERTYBOUNDARYBLUE HILL CREEKNO SEAGRASSES WEREOBSERVED GROWINGWITHIN 200 FT OF THEPROPOSED PROJECTTRANSECTTYPICAL DIVE TRANSECTMHWL2
0
0
'200'1
0
'
EXHIBIT “B”
30' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT(O.R. BOOK 5487, PAGE 743)(O.R. BOOK 6327, PAGE 3713)(O.R. BOOK 6327, PAGE 3717)APPROVED BULKHEAD LINE(PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 19)15'15'50' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT(O.R. BOOK 4217, PAGE 4106)20' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT(O.R. BOOK 4217, PAGE 4106)BLUE HILL CREEKPALM POINT DRIVEPART OF UNDIVIDEDBLOCK Y(PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 7)PART OFTRACT 1(NOT A PART OF GOODLAND ISLES,SECOND ADDITION)(OCCUPIED)N55°15
'15
"E
203
.72
'
(P&S
)LOT 2737 PALM POINT DRIVECONCRETE SLABELEVATION = 6.48FLOOD ZONE AEELEVATION 12.0FLOOD ZONE AEELEVATION 13.0FLOOD ZONE AEELEVATION 12.0FLOOD ZONE AEELEVATION 13.0PART OF UNDIVIDED BLOCK Y(PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 7)REMAINDER OFTRACT 1(NOT A PART OF GOODLAND ISLES,SECOND ADDITION)(OCCUPIED)S15°11'20"E 80.51'(P&S)S
3
4
°
3
6
'
0
0
"
W
1
4
0
.
0
0
'
(
P
&
S
)N55°24'00"W 112.00'(P&S)C1CXX - CURVE TABLECURVEC1(P&S)RADIUS170.00'DELTA07°12'40"LENGTH21.40'CHORD21.38'BEARINGS51°47'42"E20
.
0
1
'
11
9
.
9
9
'ACCRETED/FILLED LANDSAPPROXIMATELY2,552 SQUARE FEETRIPARIAN LINES74°49'57"W
RI
P
A
R
I
A
N
L
I
N
E
S
3
4
°
3
5
'
2
4
"
W APPROXIMATE MEANHIGH WATER LINEELEVATION 0.67 NAVD(133 LINEAR FEET)4.14.10.7-0.84.94.23.31.90.6-1.0-2.25.03.52.10.4-2.34.42.61.1-1.4-2.54.93.52.3-0.2-2.45.13.92.40.9-0.9-2.14.93.21.7-0.1-1.6-2.64.83.51.40.5-0.5-2.04.94.53.63.01.6-0.3-1.95.14.73.52.01.0-2.8-1.4-1.94.52
.
81.7-0.2-1.6-1.5-1.8LOT 1733 PALM POINT DRIVE(UNDER CONSTRUCTION)28.8'36.8'7.9'12.0'44
.
6
'
41
.
3
'11.2'9.4'16.6'1
0
.
0
'
9
.
9
'2.6'6
.
8
'2.4'1
9
.
0
'8.3'8
.
7
'25.4'2
4
.
7
'10.3'1
8
.
3
'8.0'1
5
.
4
'8.0'4.5'1
9
.
4
'18.7'1
9
.
7
'16.8'3.1'1.9'4
.
1
'25.6'0.7'2.7'3.8'1.2'3.6'1.6'7
.
4
'0.6'8
.
0
'7.1'4
6
.
3
'15.3'8
.
3
'11.7'4.5'5
.
0
'4.5'5.0'BOTTOM OFRIP RIPAPPROXIMATE MEANLOW WATER LINEELEVATION = -1.88 NAVD4.8'4.5'0.6'8.9'0.6'9.0'8.9'0.6'4.294
.
2
2 4.354.184.124.144.01RIPAR
IANS55°15
'15
"W
CLIENT:
TITLE:FILE NO.:SHEET OFNO.REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATE BY
COASTAL
28421 BONITA CROSSINGS BOULEVARD
ENGINEERING
CONSULTANTS
INC.
COASTAL AND MARINE ENGINEERING
ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOLOGICAL SERVICES
LAND AND MARINE SURVEY AND MAPPING
BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34135
PHONE: (239)643-2324
FAX: (239)643-1143
www.coastalengineering.com
E-Mail: info@cecifl.com
Serving Florida Since 1977
THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF
SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.
REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND
ADAPTATION BY COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. (CECI) OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES SHALL BE
WITHOUT LIABILITY TO CECI OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES.FLORIDA BUSINESS AUTHORIZATION NO. LB 2464COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: 12/03/25FLORIDA CERTIFICATE NO. 5295PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPERTHE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDANOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE ANDLICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPERDATE OF SIGNATURE: RICHARD J. EWING, VPCHECKED:
F.B.
ACAD NO.
PG.
DRAWN:
DATE:
REF. NO.
SCALE:
SEC.TWP.RNG.25.21611RECORD SURVEY
STEVEN D KAPUSTA LIV TRUST 1" = 20"
M710
53
27E52S
25.216
25.216-735RECORD
12/04/25
MMW
RJE
18LEGAL DESCRIPTIONLOT 2, GOODLAND SHORES AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 76, PAGES 77 AND 78, OF THEPUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.THE ABOVE DESCRIBES AN AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 17,141 SQUARE FEET OR 0.39ACRES OF LAND.GENERAL NOTES1. = SET 4"X4" CONCRETE MONUMENT STAMPED PRM CEC LB 2464.2. = SET 5/8" IRON PIN AND CAP STAMPED CEC LB 2464.3. BEARINGS BASED ON A GRID BEARING OF S15°11'20"E ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PALM POINT DRIVE.4. DESCRIBED PROPERTY LIES IN FLOOD ZONE AE, ELEVATIONS 12.0 AND 13.0 PER F.I.R.M.COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 120067 MAP NO. 12021C 0842J DATED FEBRUARY 08/2024.5. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO NORTH AMERICAN VERTICALDATUM 1988 (N.A.V.D. 88).6. ELEVATIONS AND DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF.7. THIS SURVEY IS CERTIFIED TO THE DATE OF THE FIELD SURVEY, NOTTHE DATE OF SIGNATURE.LEGEND(P) = PLAT DATA(S) = SURVEY DATA(TYP.) = TYPICAL OF LOT 2, GOODLAND SHORES AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 76, PAGES 77 AND 78, OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.402010200SCALE: 1" = 20'