HEX Final Decision #2026-29Page 1 of 7
HEX NO. 2026-29
HEARING EXAMINER DECISION
DATE OF HEARING.
April 9, 2026
PETITION.
Petition No. BD-PL20250006004 (Schulte Dock) - 733 Palm Point Drive - Request for a 5-foot
boat dock extension, over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier
County Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways 100 feet or greater in width, to construct a
new dock facility that will protrude a total of 25 feet into a waterway that is 345± feet wide. The
subject property is located at 733 Palm Point Drive, AKA: Lot 1, Goodland Shores, in Section 18,
Township 52 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida.
GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION.
The proposed dock facility would be a 4-foot-wide access or gangway leading to a 4- to 6-foot-
wide shore parallel dock with a single slip, including a 14-foot by 14-foot boat lift for a 40-foot
vessel. The required 15-foot side/riparian setbacks are satisfied on both sides of the dock facility.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
Approval with conditions.
FINDINGS.
1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87(4) of the
Collier County Code of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter
9 of the County Administrative Code.
2. The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all
County and state requirements.
3. The public hearing was conducted electronically and in-person in accordance with
Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04.
4. The public hearing was conducted in the following manner: the County Staff presented the
Petition followed by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner’s representative, public comment and then
rebuttal by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner’s representative. There were no objections at the
public hearing.
5. The Hearing Examiner disclosed having reviewed the record for the petition and having no ex
parte communications.
Page 2 of 7
6. In accordance with LDC Section 5.03.06.H., the Collier County Hearing Examiner shall
approve, approve with conditions, or deny a dock facility extension request based on certain
criteria. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve this request, at least four of the five
primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria must be met.1
Primary Criteria:
1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate
in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the
subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier
islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the
property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be
no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling
unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be
appropriate.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The subject property is zoned for a single-
family residential unit, which warrants no more than 2 slips per CC-LDC. The
proposed docking facility consists of installing one boatlift to accommodate a 40-foot
LOA vessel.” Zoning staff concurred.
2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the
general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner’s application is
unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner’s application
and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching
and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The boat dock extension is necessary to
extend out past the existing rip-rap shoreline bank that was recently refurbished within
the historical footprint. The subject property is located within the Rookery Bay Aquatic
Preserve, which limits the overall allowed protrusion to 25 feet, even though we are
still within limited water depths at that point and well within the allowed 25% width of
the waterway. Based on the existing rip-rap shoreline, we are limited to bringing the
dock any further landward.” Zoning staff concurred.
3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation
within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not
intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic
in the channel.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The proposed docking facility is located
1 The Hearing Examiner’s findings are italicized.
Page 3 of 7
on an unmarked man-altered waterway; therefore, the entire waterway provides safe
navigation between the two shorelines. As proposed, the docking facilities should not,
in our opinion, have any new impact on the existing navigation on the subject
waterway.” Zoning staff concurred.
4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the
width of the waterway and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway
width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The
facility should maintain the required percentages.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The approximate waterway width varies
from the south to the north side, but on average, the width is labeled as being 345-feet
wide. Based on the proposed dock’s overall protrusion, the dock will only protrude out
into the waterway approximately 8%, which is well within the allowed 25%.” Zoning
staff added that there is no dock facility on the opposite shoreline, thus the distance
between the subject dock and the opposite MHWL is 343 feet.
5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the
facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should
not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The proposed docking facility design and
slip layout has taken each existing and potential future adjacent docking facility into
consideration to avoid any potential impacts. As proposed, we are confident that there
will not be any new impacts to neighboring docks nor their existing ingress/egress to
their existing slips/boatlift. Additionally, as proposed, the dock will provide much
larger setbacks from the riparian lines than the required 15 feet.” Zoning staff
concurred.
Secondary Criteria:
1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the
subject property or waterway, that justify the proposed dimensions and location
of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related
to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline
configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
been met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The subject property shoreline and associated
plated property is unique in that there is a significant amount of filled land between the
MHWL and the plated property line. With the recently acquired Quit Claim Deed, the
new property line is also per the legal description, now the property line, therefore the
dock protrusion will be taken from that point. This and the overall top of rip-rap
Page 4 of 7
elevation being at 5.0’ NAVD increases the proposed dock protrusion for the dock to
reach adequate depths.” Zoning staff concurred.
2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the
vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive
deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use
excessive deck area.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The proposed docking facility has been
fully minimized to meet the state aquatic preserve rules and still provide sufficient deck
area for routine maintenance, safe access, as well as recreational activities like fishing,
plus storage. The total over-water square footage is 270 square feet.” Zoning staff
concurred.
3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel or vessels in
combination described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject
property’s linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage
should be maintained.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The proposed docking facility has been
designed to moor one vessel, approximately 40 feet in length. The subject property’s
shoreline length is approximately 154 feet, therefore leaving more than 50% open as
required.” Zoning staff concurred.
4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view
of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on
the view of a neighboring property owner.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The existing on-site conditions consist of
a newly refurbished riprap and some vegetated natural mangroves along the shoreline.
The vegetation removal has already significantly increased the view of both adjacent
properties to the waterway, as well as the subject property. As such, both adjacent
neighboring properties have docks or will have docks, being consistent with the other
properties in this area. Finally, as proposed, the dock has been designed to be
construed well within the designated setbacks and limited overall protrusion out into
the waterway. Based on this, it is our opinion that there are no new impacts to either
adjacent property owner.” Zoning staff concurred.
5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass
beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.J of the LDC must be
demonstrated.)
Page 5 of 7
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
has been met. The submerged resources survey provided indicates that no seagrass
beds exist within 200 feet of the proposed dock. No seagrass beds will be impacted by
the proposed dock facility.
6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection
requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance
with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
is not applicable. LDC Section 5.03.06.E.11 stipulates that “multi-slip docking
facilities with 10 or more slips will be reviewed for consistency with the Manatee
Protection Plan (MPP).” The proposed project is for a private single slip docking
facility accessory to a single-family residence in Goodland. The proposed facility does
not have more than 10 slips and so is not subject to review for consistency with the
MPP.
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION.
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the Environmental
Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. The
proposed docking facilities will be constructed waterward of the existing rip-rapped shoreline in
Blue Hill Creek. The submerged resources survey provided by the applicant found no submerged
resources in the area; Exhibit sheet page 10 of 10 provides an aerial with a note stating that no
seagrasses were observed within 200 feet. The proposed docking facility will be placed in the
ACSC/ST Overlay (Area of State Critical State Concern/Special Treatment). An ST permit will be
required prior to approval of the building permit for the proposed docking facility.
This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council Board (EAC) review, because
this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in
Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and
Ordinances.
ANALYSIS.
The subject waterfront property comprises 0.53 acres located within a Village Residential (VR)
Zoning District and the Goodland Zoning Overlay (GZO) upon which a single-family residence is
presently under construction per Building Permit No. PRFH20250418174, issued on August 8,
2025. The property has 154 feet of waterfrontage on a natural waterway, Blue Hill Creek, which
is part of the Rookery Bay Aquatic Preserve on the SW side of Goodland. The shoreline consists
of a newly refurbished rip-rap bank; the previously existing mangroves have been fully removed.
Proposed is a 4-foot-wide access or gangway leading to a 4- to 6-foot-wide shore parallel dock
with a single slip, including a 14-foot by 14-foot boat lift for a 40-foot vessel. The required 15-
foot side/riparian setbacks are satisfied on both sides of the dock facility.
Page 6 of 7
The Hearing Examiner concludes that there is enough competent, substantial evidence based on
the review of the record that includes the Petition, application, exhibits, the County’s staff report,
and comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or their representative(s), County staff and
anyone from the public, to approve the Petition for the boat dock. The boat dock petition meets 5
of the 5 primary criteria and 5 of the 6 secondary criteria with one criterion being not applicable.
The criteria are set forth in Section 5.03.06.H of the Land Development Code.
DECISION.
The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition Number BD-PL20250006004, filed by Jeff
Rogers of Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc., representing the owner/applicant Julie Lynn Schulte,
Trustee of the Julie Lynn Schulte Living Trust, with respect to the property described as located
at 733 Palm Point Drive, AKA: Lot 1, Goodland Shores, in Section 18, Township 52 South, Range
27 East, Collier County, Florida, for the following:
• To allow a 5-foot boat dock extension over the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet
allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for
waterways 100 feet or greater in width, to allow a new boat docking facility protruding a
total of 25 feet into a waterway that is 345± feet wide, for the benefit of the subject property.
Said changes are fully described in the Proposed Dock and Related Plans attached as Exhibit "A"
and the Record Survey attached as Exhibit “B”, and are subject to the condition(s) set forth below.
ATTACHMENTS.
Exhibit A – Proposed Dock and Related Plans
Exhibit B – Record Survey
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
The subject property is located at 733 Palm Point Drive, AKA: Lot 1, Goodland Shores, in Section
18, Township 52 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida.
CONDITIONS.
All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the
development.
DISCLAIMER.
Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any
way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency
and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant
fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or
undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.
Page 7 of 7
APPEALS.
This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done
in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES
AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR
VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE
NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
April 23, 2026
Date Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP
Hearing Examiner
EXHIBIT “A”
STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 25.920999<> LONGITUDE:W -81.647423SITE ADDRESS:<> 733 PALM POINT DR GOODLAND, FL 34140Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-NORTH_733LOT.dwg LOCATION MAP 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827733 PALM POINT DRLOCATION MAP52-------------------01 OF 10COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF AMERICA8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY
p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-NORTH_733LOT.dwg 1/23/2026NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-NORTH_733LOT.dwg 1952 AERIAL 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827733 PALM POINT DR1952 AERIAL52-------------------02 OF 10PROPERTY BOUNDARY·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC."11-06-25-1.86'+0.54'151'0345'BLUE HILL CREEK
2.32.23.2-
4
.
1
4 -4.24-4.54-5
.
3
4 -5.24-5.
0
4
-5.24 -4.24-3.04-2.94-2.84-2.54-2.94-1.14-1.54-1.54-2.17-3.74
-2
.
9
4
-1.94-1
.
6
4
-
1
.
8
4
-1.44-2.64-2.34-3
.
1
4
-0.34-0.4-0.14-0.04-0.34-0.74-0.64-0.44-0.260.262.32.25.03.52.10.44.42.61.1-2.54.93.52.3-0.2-2.45.13.92.40.9-0.9-2.14.93.21.7-0.1-2.64.83.51.40.5-0.5-2.04.94.53.63.01.6-0.3-1.95.14.73.52.01.0-1.4-1.94.52.81.7-0.2-1.6-1.5-1.8p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-NORTH_733LOT.dwg 1/23/2026NESW0204080SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-NORTH_733LOT.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827733 PALM POINT DREXISTING CONDITIONS52-------------------03 OF 10PALM POINT DRPROPERTY BOUNDARYMHWLACCRETEDFILLEDLANDSMANGROVE FRINGERIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINESITE ADDRESS:,733 PALM POINT DRGOODLANDFL34140·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC."11-06-25-1.86'+0.54'154'0345'MANGROVES HAVE BEENREMOVED216'59'204'122'BLUE HILL CREEKEXISTINGRIPRAP11'
1.14.93.52.3-0.2-2.45.13.92.40.9-0.9-2.14.93.21.7-0.1-2.64.83.51.40.5-0.5-2.04.94.53.63.01.6-0.3-1.95.14.73.52.01.0-1.4-1.94.52.
81.7-
0
.
2-1.6-1.5-1.8NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-NORTH_733LOT.dwg PROPOSED DOCK-DIMENSIONS 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827733 PALM POINT DRPROPOSED DOCK-DIMENSIONS52-------------------04 OF 10PROPERTYBOUNDARYMHWLRIPARIAN LINEFIXED DOCKRIPARIAN LINE14'X14'BOATLIFT25' OFFSET FROM MHWLMANGROVESHAVE BEENREMOVEDMANGROVESTO REMAINRIPRAPAA0610'PROPOSEDRAIL (26 LF)BLUE HILL CREEK1
4
'14'6'46'4'83'2
5
'·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:"COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC."11-06-25-1.86'+0.54'154'0345'27027025'40'1
3
'26'21'53'42'4'2
5
'ACCRETED/FILLED LANDSAPPROXIMATELY2,552 SF40'
2
.
3 2.23
.
2
-5.34-
5
.
2
4
-
5
.
0
4 -5.24-4.24-3.04-2.94-2.84-2.54-
2
.
9
4-1.14-1.54-1.54-2.17-3.74-2.94-1.94-1.64-1.84-1.44-
2
.
6
4
-2.34-0.14-0.04-0.34-0.74-0.64-0.44-0.260.262
.
3 2.21.14.93.52.3-0.2-2.45.13.92.40.9-0.9-2.14.93.21.7-0.1-2.64.83.51.40.5-0.5-2.04.94.53.63.01.6-0.3-1.95.14.73.52.01.0-1.4-1.94.52.
81.7-
0
.
2-1.6-1.5-1.8NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-NORTH_733LOT.dwg PROPOSED DOCK-DEPTHS 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827733 PALM POINT DRPROPOSED DOCK-DEPTHS52-------------------05 OF 10PROPERTYBOUNDARYMANGROVES HAVEBEEN REMOVEDMHWLRIPARIAN LINEFIXED DOCK14'X14' BOATLIFT25' OFFSET FROM MHWLMANGROVESTO REMAINPROPOSEDRAILBLUE HILL CREEKRIPRAP·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:"COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC."11-06-25-1.86'+0.54'154'0345'27027025'ACCRETED/FILLED LANDSAPPROXIMATELY2,552 SFRIPARIAN LINE
-2.94-5.2403612SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-NORTH_733LOT.dwg CROSS SECTION AA 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827733 PALM POINT DRCROSS SECTION AA52-------------------06 OF 10BLUEHILLCREEKFIXEDDOCKMHW = +0.54' NAVD88MLW =-1.86' NAVD88ALL PILES TO BE WRAPPEDFROM 12" ABOVE MHWL TO6" BELOW SUBSTRATE14' BOATLIFTMANGROVES HAVEBEEN REMOVEDWOODEN BORDER PLACEDAT ELEV= 5.5 NAVD885'6'STAIRS25' PROTRUSION FROM MHWLEXISTING RIPRAP
NESW02550100SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-NORTH_733LOT.dwg ST OVERLAY MAP 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827733 PALM POINT DRST OVERLAY MAP52-------------------07 OF 10PROPERTYBOUNDARYFIXED DOCKBLUE HILL CREEKPALM POINT DRST OVERLAY
NESW060120240SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-NORTH_733LOT.dwg ADJACENT DOCKS 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827733 PALM POINT DRADJACENT DOCKS52-------------------08 OF 10PROPERTYBOUNDARYBLUE HILL CREEKPALM POINT DR65'30'55'28'18'10'34'4'42'21
'38'20'71'47'27'14'17'18'19'25'22'
34'
31'
35'
35'
2
5
'
25
'
4.14.10.7-0.84.94.23.31.90.6-1.0-2.25.03.52.10.4-2.34.42.61.1-2.54.93.52.3-0.2-2.45.13.92.40.9-0.9-2.14.93.21.7-0.1-2.64.83.51.40.5-0.5-2.04.94.53.63.01.6-0.3-1.95.14.73.52.01.0-1.4-1.94.52.81.7-0.
2-1.6-1.5-1.8NESW050100200SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-NORTH_733LOT.dwg WIDTH OF WATERWAY 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827733 PALM POINT DRWIDTH OF WATERWAY52-------------------09 OF 10PROPERTYBOUNDARYBLUE HILL CREEK37
1
'PALM POINT DR34
3
'
NESW02550100SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\23124.00 kapusta - 733 palm point drive\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\23124-BDE-NORTH_733LOT.dwg SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 1/23/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ01-13-2623124-1827733 PALM POINT DRSUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY52-------------------10 OF 10PROPERTYBOUNDARYBLUE HILL CREEKNO SEAGRASSES WEREOBSERVED GROWINGWITHIN 200 FT OF THEPROPOSED PROJECTTRANSECT200'10'200'TYPICAL DIVE TRANSECTMHWL
EXHIBIT “B”