Loading...
Agenda 04/28/2026 Item # 9D (Ordinance amending the zoning classification from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Special Treatment Overlay (ST) to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for a project to be known as Imperial Lakes RPUD)4/28/2026 Item # 9.1) ID# 2026-738 Executive Summary This item requires Commission members to provide ex-parte disclosure. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending the zoning classification from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Special Treatment Overlay (ST) to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for a project to be known as Imperial Lakes RPUD to allow development of the previously approved 430 multifamily dwelling units or an alternative of 313 dwelling units including single family, two family, townhouse and multifamily subject to a trip cap for 78.28+ acres of property located on the future extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard, north of Imperial Golf Club, west of Castlewood at Imperial Planned Unit Development, in Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East; providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 82-81; and providing an effective date. [PL20250006588 - Imperial Lakes PUDA] (This item is a companion to Item 9C) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners ("Board") review staff s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding this PUD Amendment (PUDA) petition; and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The site is +78.28 acres located on the south side of the future extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard, north of Imperial Golf Club and west of Castlewood at Imperial Planned Unit Development and Aubry Rodgers High School. To the west and also to the north is the Railhead Scrub Preserve, environmentally sensitive land managed by Collier County through the Conservation Collier Program. Veterans Memorial Boulevard currently terminates approximately 880 feet east of the site, where it accesses Aubrey Rogers High School. The extension of the east -west corridor has been planned for over 40 years. A Developer Agreement is proposed to advance the construction of the western extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard to the Seminole Gulf Railway, providing access to this development. The site is comprised of one parcel identified as Parcel ID #00153160004. This site is currently undeveloped with two lakes remnant from past commercial excavation. The site was originally rezoned from A-2, Agricultural, and ST, Special Treatment Overlay, to Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development (PUD) by Ordinance Number 82-81 approved on September 21, 1982 (see Attachment B). The approved PUD allowed for two commercial excavation lakes and for development of up to 430 multi -family units, which equates to 5.5 units per acre. The maximum number of units allowed on the site per the current PUD approval is 430 multi -family units. This request is to allow an alternative of up to 313 of a combination of multi -family, single family detached, two family, and townhouse units subject to a trip cap not to exceed 290 peak hour two-way trips, which is +/- 85 net new PM peak hour trips in addition to the currently vested +/-205 PM peak hour trips for this PUD. Relief from application of the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance (Ordinance 90-23) was granted through an exemption approval letter issued on February 4, 1991, see Attachment C. This relief recognized the density of the PUD as allowable due to the property owner's deed of the north 50 feet of the property to Collier County to provide for half of the planned 100-foot right-of-way for an east -west arterial road. The deed is recorded in Official Record Book 1051, Page 1686. The proposed PUD Amendment is to update the PUD, repealing Ordinance Number 82-81. Staff and the petitioner note that the ST, Special Treatment Overlay, areas remain on the official zoning atlas despite the reference to their rezoning to PUD in the approved Ordinance. This PUD Amendment action will recognize that the ST Special Treatment Overlays are not applicable to the property should the amendment be approved. Six deviations from subdivision regulations were granted as part of Ordinance Number 82-81. The petitioner seeks three deviations: Deviation 1 is to carry forward the relief from the required minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet to allow 50-foot wide internal access easements or rights -of -way. Deviation 2 is request for relief from the requirement for sidewalks on both sides of internal streets to allow a bike path on one side and a sidewalk on the other. 4/28/2026 Item # 9.1) ID# 2026-738 Deviation 3 is a request for relief from the requirement for preserve areas to be connected on the site to allow four separate preserve areas. The petitioner has a pending request to vacate (VAC-PL20260000213) the 30-foot-wide Roadway Easement over the thirty (30) feet of the south line of the northeast quarter of Section 15, recorded in Official Records 238, Page 913, which is a portion of a sixty (60) foot wide roadway easement. The Roadway Easement encumbers the southern thirty (30) feet of the Property. If the vacation is not approved, then the setback on the southern boundary will be measured from the roadway easement and not the property line. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPQ RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard Petition PL20250006588, Imperial Lakes PUDA, on March 5, 2026. Three members of the public spoke during the Planning Commission hearing, including two residents of Castlewood at Imperial PUD voicing concerns about flood risk, setbacks, exposure to views through the proposed buffers, security fencing, light pollution, wildlife protection, disconnection of preserves and voicing preference for conservation uses. Brad Cornell of Audubon Western Everglades spoke with concerns about compatibility with Railhead Scrub Preserve, fire protection and buffering, light impact on wildlife, bear conflicts and bear -proof trashcans, littoral plantings, coastal scrub habitat destruction in the northwest corner of the property, and turf grass fertilizer impacts to water quality. The Planning Commission discussed matters related to state and federal permitting governing stormwater management and species management, compatibility, access, lighting, setbacks, and the project's bear management plan. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval subject to the following conditions which are reflected in the Ordinance attached to this Executive Summary: • The petitioner will limit use of the southeastern portion of the property bordering Castlewood at Imperial PUD to single family units with maximum height of 2 stories. Principal & accessory structure rear setbacks in this location shall not be reduced to 0 where abutting open space or landscape buffer tract. • Common area lighting and streetlights in the RPUD will be a maximum color temperature of 3,000 Kelvin (K). • The RPUD will utilize County -approved bear -proof dumpsters/trash cans for all residential and non-residential uses, with locations of dumpsters being determined at time of Site Development Plan (SDP) approval. All costs including maintenance of bear -proof dumpsters will be borne by the owner/developer. • Access to the RPUD will be provided pursuant to a companion Developer's Agreement. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Specifically, the project is within the 330-foot and 660-foot bald eagle nest protection zones, and the petitioner is requesting a deviation to allow the preservation areas to not be contiguous as required by LDC Section 3.05.07.A.5. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the petition. The CCPC acting as the EAC voted unanimously to recommend approval subject to the conditions noted above which are reflected in the Ordinance attached to this Executive Summary. This item is consistent with the Collier County strategic plan objective to implement prudent and inclusive policy development through effective planning for transportation, land use, and growth management. FISCAL IMPACT: The rezoning by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build -out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the PUD Rezone is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impact of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvements Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. 4/28/2026 Item # 9.1) ID# 2026-738 Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The subject property is located within the Urban designated area (Urban — Urban Mixed -Use District — Urban Residential Subdistrict), as identified on the Future Land Use Map. As part of Resolution No. 97-72, "the density of the PUD has been determined to be vested." This vesting is based on the exemption approved pursuant to the Zoning Re -Evaluation Ordinance No. 90-23. Approval of the exemption precluded the County from applying a down -zoning to the property, resulting in the PUD zoning remaining in effect and continuing to allow 430 multi -family units. FLUE Map #9 indicates that the Imperial Lakes PUD received an exemption, or compatibility exception, during the Zoning Re -Evaluation Program and is deemed consistent pursuant to Policy 5.12. The Imperial Lakes PUD, approved by Ordinance 82-81, allows a maximum gross project density of 5.5 dwelling units per acre (DU/A), with the total number of dwelling units not to exceed 430 (430 units / 78.28 acres = 5.49 DU/A). One of the proposed housing types maintains a maximum of 430 multi -family dwelling units at a density of 5.49 DU/A. The petitioner is proposing to allow up to 313 dwelling units if developed with a combination of dwelling unit types, which would result in a density of 3.99 units per acre. The Urban designated areas, as identified in the FLUE, will accommodate residential uses, including single-family, multi -family, and duplex. The Density Rating System is only applicable to areas designated on the Future Land Use Map as: Urban, Urban Mixed Use District. Within the applicable Urban Designated Areas, a base density of 4 residential dwelling units per gross acre may be allowed, though not an entitlement. This base level of density may be adjusted depending upon the location and characteristics of the project. For purposes of calculating the eligible number of dwelling units for a project (gross acreage multiplied by eligible number of dwelling units per acre), the total number of dwelling units may be rounded up by one unit if the dwelling unit total yields a fraction of a unit .5 or greater. If the petitioner develops the site with the proposed maximum of 313 dwelling units, the resulting density would be 3.99 DU/A (313 units / 78.28 acres = 3.99 < 4 DU/A), and is compliant with the base 4 DU/A allowed by the Density Rating System. Comprehensive Planning staff concludes based on analysis of proposed uses and densities that the PUD Amendment is consistent with the Future Land Use Element. Based on the TIS provided by the applicant, the 2024 and 2025 AUIR, the subject PUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. A companion Developer Agreement is proposed to address the extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard including access to this development. Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the CCME. The project site is 78.28 acres; 47.86 acres of the site meets the LDC definition of native vegetation. A minimum of 11.97 acres (25% of 47.86 acres of native vegetation) of preserve is required and shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. The proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with the GMP. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a site -specific amendment to a Planned Unit Development Zoning District. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed amendment is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners, should it consider denying the amendment, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Should this item be denied, Florida Statutes section 125.022(5) requires the County to provide written notice to the applicant citing applicable portions of an ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority for the denial. 4/28/2026 Item # 9.1) ID# 2026-738 Criteria for PUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed PUD Amendment with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with RPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed PUD Amendment be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested PUD Amendment result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 4/28/2026 Item # 9.1) ID# 2026-738 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed PUD Amendment on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the PUD Amendment request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. This item is approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. — (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION(S): To approve Petition PUDA-PL20250006588, Imperial Lakes PUDA and adopt the Ordinance amending the Imperial Lakes PUD. PREPARED BY: Ray Bellows, AICP, Zoning Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. CCPC Staff Report - Imperial Lakes PUDA 2. Art A - Ordinance - 031726 3. CCPC Art B - Original PUD Ord 82-81 - Imperial Lakes PUDA 4. CCPC Att C - Determination Letter 02-1991 - Imperial Lakes PUDA 5. CCPC Art D - Applicant Backup - Imperial Lakes PUDA 6. CCPC Art E - NIM Documentation - Imperial Lakes PUDA 7. CCPC Public Input - Imperial Lakes PUDA 8. CCPC Aff Sign Posting - Imperial Lakes PUDA 9. Legal Ad - BCC 42826 Imperial Lakes PL20250006588 _f) Collier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: MARCH 5, 2026 SUBJECT: PL20250006588 — IMPERIAL LAKES PUD AMENDMENT (PUDA) PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner/Applicant: N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. 8156 Fiddler's Creek Pkwy Naples, FL 34114 Agents: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Naples, FL, 34102 Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail N., Suite 300. Naples, FL 34103 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) consider changing the zoning classification from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Special Treatment Overlay (ST) District to the Imperial Lakes Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to allow development of the previously approved 430 multifamily dwelling units or an alternative of 313 dwelling units including single family, two family, townhouse and multifamily subject to a trip cap and providing for repeal of Ordinance 82-81 for 78.28+ acres of property located on the future extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard, north of Imperial Golf Club, west of Castlewood at Imperial Planned Unit Development in Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The property consists of 78.28+ acres located on the future extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard, north of Imperial Golf Club, west of Castlewood at Imperial PUD in Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 1 of 22 February 19, 2026 Vi ro a ��-- P� o m R 1 e PROJECT • BL ^ LOCATION Ar n RD l� tier Cen r a AY t R e ra s Me r' G D c S nr s C W. DUk z n o rial GU r, g� Tri LVD .a ess E a 8 C AVE s y V Location Map IMPERIAL LAKES pt STLEM CAAT IMPERi�- .I N1 Petition Number: PL20250006588 Zoning Map PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The property consists of 78.28+ acres of vegetation and lake area located on the south side of the future extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard, north of Imperial Golf Club, and west of Aubrey Rogers High School and the Castlewood at Imperial PUD. To the west and north is the Railhead Scrub Preserve, an environmentally sensitive land managed by Collier County. Veterans Memorial Boulevard currently terminates approximately 880 feet east of the site, where it accesses Aubrey Rogers High School. The extension of the east -west corridor has been planned for over 40 years. A Developer Agreement is proposed to address the extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard, including access to this development. The proposed amendment is to allow for residential development with an expanded range of dwelling unit types as an alternative to the currently allowed 430 multi -family units. The alternative is to allow up to 313 of a combination of multi -family, single family detached, two family, and townhouse units, subject to a trip cap not to exceed 290 peak hour two-way trips, which is +/- 85 net new PM peak hour trips in addition to the currently vested +/-205 PM peak hour trips for this PUD. The site was originally rezoned from A-2, Agricultural, and ST, Special Treatment Overlay, to Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development (PUD) by Ordinance Number 82-81 approved on September 21, 1982 (see Attachment B). The approved PUD allowed for two commercial excavation lakes and for development of up to 430 multi -family units, which equates to 5.5 units per acre. See the PUD Master Plan approved for the Imperial Lakes PUD on the following page. PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 2 of 22 February 19, 2026 Relief from application of the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance (Ordinance 90-23) was granted through an exemption approval letter issued on February 4, 1991, see Attachment C. This relief recognized the density of the PUD as allowable due to the property owner's deed of the north 50 feet of the property to Collier County to provide for half of the planned 100-foot right-of-way for an east -west arterial road. The deed is recorded in Official Record Book 1051, Page 1686. The proposed PUD Amendment updates the PUD by repealing Ordinance Number 82-81. Staff and the petitioner note that the ST (Special Treatment Overlay) areas remain on the official zoning atlas despite the reference to their rezoning to PUD in the approved Ordinance. This PUD Amendment action will recognize that the ST Special Treatment Overlays are not applicable to the property if the amendment is approved. IMPERIAL LAKES MASTER PLAN I I I . ' ease• I I I a oY Oa' I. I \. r�� [m � � •I I I'. ,a. I J rI t 21 so 1 -- r err f e i I a 4 arr � I .•, r. i, l� IIIL_ _p_�_____ ____ �..... .� _...'oY oYe e���FV ~•'_— —_ 120 LD RI aE YNITS on0l/ VR4+[cT I—: i6 3e 4 k& »Y�w�• r yL[�� >I�a M•V 916[ ux•7, G[0[e N[NiIT><: e.L9 YMI19 NACRE fir= . D TOTAL On ITS IMPERIAL LAKES NOTE. MANTES •-• ASSOCIATES, IML R+srW n+Y to Approved PUD Master Plan from Ordinance 82-81, see Attachment B PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 3 of 22 February 19, 2026 Six deviations from subdivision regulations were granted as part of Ordinance Number 82-81. The petitioner seeks three deviations. Deviation 1 is to carry forward the relief from the required minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet to allow 50-foot-wide internal access easements or rights -of -way. Deviation 2 is a request for relief from the requirement for sidewalks on both sides of internal streets to allow a bike path on one side and a sidewalk on the other. Deviation 3 is a request for relief from the requirement for preserve areas to be connected on the site to allow four separate preserve areas. See page 19 of this report for a discussion of the deviations. 5V RUND RLGHT-OF-WAY IN FEE SIMPLE MR. IM I PG 16061 M W ROADWAY EASEMENT 011238 PG 013 AMD OR 242 PG 25I 21Y WIDE TYPED' n LANDSCAPE BUFFER ZONE: I SCALE. 1" = 400' UNDEtiEL(RED LIJLii.�'IrFLR,,';G�1#� Y4f.kF%'AIFIHi1F}FH lfk i[7dii14f kAC.kilAlll_ ZONED; A r� I i'0NSERVATIONC'0LI3I.R PRESERVE I 6OUNDARYS' 130"D �I f. IT WIDE TYPE'&' LANDSCAPE ZONED:.4 CONSERVATION COLLIER I PRESERVE Ll AA f R V WIDE RESERVATION BUFFER R 15'1ti9DBTYPE'B LANDSCAPE BUFFER % fi' WIDE RESERVATION 15UFFER Z4NEV, A HIGH SCHOOL 4 1 w i f f r T WIDETYFE'B' TRACT'B" CA17FLEW00D AT IMPERIAL PUP IRESIDENTIAL WI ATTUN DF %74Lti"C1YCi kRi' L7iJSIiNG Sn ROADWAY EASEkIBHF ORAM kC:E EASEMENT EXISTING I J, DRAINAGE EASEMENT R RESTT]F.MIAL OR 1 9 PH 39, FU 8I-S2 AA AMENITY AREA OR 139 FIF 913 L LAKE TARED' GC. P PRESERVE IMPERIAL GOLFCLUB IMPERIAL LAKES RPUD G.....'1.—, u osLu...l..,...., ur. r-Y 41. vl4/ n.r. s��•+. RrHk sna• aw�Ytnmh I3,IIMWema . W`df—S— r Pl— ��_.. EXHIBIT C MASTER PIM REVEED a,..�...oms...,..tea•-"" RriiltY� iU MT.II�I oL�nw u..» iv FTn Llrw iMrAh{W 120DA& O ew-+- � �w 2 Petitioner's Proposed RPUD Master Plan from Draft Ordinance, see Attachment A PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 4 of 22 February 19, 2026 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the boundaries of the subject property, zoned Imperial Lakes PUD, which currently allows for 430 multifamily dwelling units (5.5 dwelling units per acre): North: To the north are two narrow privately owned strips of land, zoned Industrial (I), where the east -west Veterans Memorial Boulevard extension is planned, beyond which is the Collier County Railhead Scrub Preserve, also zoned I. South: Imperial Golf Club golf course and residences, zoned GC and RMF-16. The Krehling Industries PUD is also to the southwest. East: Aubrey Rogers High School zoned Rural Agricultural (A) and Castlewood at Imperial PUD, approved by Ord. No. 01-16 for 34 units, and built out with 31 single family homes on 21.16 acres (equates to 1.47 units per acre) West: Collier County Railhead Scrub Preserve zoned Rural Agricultural (A). Image source: Collier County Property Appraiser PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 5 of 22 February 19, 2026 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subj ect property is located within the Urban designated area (Urban — Urban Mixed - Use District — Urban Residential Subdistrict), as identified on the Future Land Use Map. As part of Resolution No. 97-72, "the density of the PUD has been determined to be vested." This vesting is based on the exemption approved pursuant to the Zoning Re -Evaluation Ordinance No. 90-23. Approval of the exemption precluded the County from applying a down -zoning to the property, resulting in the PUD zoning remaining in effect and continuing to allow 430 multi -family units. FLUE Map #9 indicates that the Imperial Lakes PUD received an exemption, or compatibility exception, during the Zoning Re -Evaluation Program and is deemed consistent pursuant to Policy 5.12. The Imperial Lakes PUD, approved by Ordinance 82-81, allows a maximum gross project density of 5.5 dwelling units per acre (DU/A), with the total number of dwelling units not to exceed 430 (430 units / 78.28 acres = 5.49 DU/A). One of the proposed housing types maintains a maximum of 430 multi -family dwelling units at a density of 5.49 DU/A. The petitioner proposes allowing up to 313 dwelling units, developed with a combination of dwelling types, resulting in a density of 3.99 units per acre. The Urban designated areas, as identified in the FLUE, will accommodate residential uses, including single-family, multi -family, and duplex. The Density Rating System is applicable only to areas designated on the Future Land Use Map as Urban or Urban Mixed -Use District. Within the applicable Urban Designated Areas, a base density of 4 residential dwelling units per gross acre may be allowed, though not an entitlement. This base level of density may be adjusted depending upon the location and characteristics of the project. For purposes of calculating the eligible number of dwelling units for a project (gross acreage multiplied by the eligible number of dwelling units per acre), the total number of dwelling units may be rounded up by one unit if the dwelling unit total yields a fraction of a unit .5 or greater. If the petitioner develops the site with the proposed maximum of 313 dwelling units, the resulting density would be 3.99 DU/A (313 units / 78.28 acres = 3.99 < 4 DU/A) and would be compliant with the base 4 DU/A allowed by the Density Rating System. Comprehensive Planning staff concludes, based on an analysis of the proposed uses and densities, that the PUD Amendment is consistent with the Future Land Use Element. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicants' October 12, 2025, Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2024 and 2025 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states: "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity ofpermissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 6 of 22 February 19, 2026 projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impact if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project' significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff findings: According to the TIS provided with this petition, the proposed Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment will generate a total of +/- 290 PM peak :hour trips on the adjacent roadway, Veterans Memorial Boulevard. This represents an increase of +/- 85 net new PM peak hour trips in addition to the currently vested +/-205 PM peak hour trips for this PUD. The (net) new trips generated will occur on the following adjacent roadway network links: Current Peak Hour Projected Roadway/Link Link Peak P.M Peak 2024 2024 2025 2025 Direction Hour/Peak Level of Remaining Level of Remaining Volume/ Direction Service Capacity Service Capacity Peak Project (LOS) (LOS) Direction Traffic 1 Veterans US-41 to 2,000/WB 30/WB N/A N/A N/A N/A Memorial Livingston Blvd/NA (2) Rd Livingston Imperial St 3,000/NB 119/NB B 1,393 C 1,289 Road/51.0 to Immokalee Rd Immokalee Livingston 3,100/EB 8/EB D 167 F (2) (3) Road/42.1 Rd to Airport Rd US-41/98.0 Lee Co. 3,100/NB 14/NB C 926 D 716 Line to Wiggins Pass Source for P.M. Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Traffic is October 12, 2025; Traffic Impact Statement provided by the petitioner. Currently, this roadway is not included in the AUIR. Deficiency is due to the Trip Bank, not caused by this development. See State Statutes summary below. PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 7 of 22 February 19, 2026 Florida Statute 163.3180 • Must allow an applicant to enter into a binding agreement to pay or construct their proportionate fair share. • Facilities determined to be deficient with existing, committed, and vested trips plus projected background traffic from any source other than the development shall be removed from the proportionate share calculation. • The improvement necessary to correct this type of deficiency is the funding responsibility of the maintaining entity. • Applicant must receive a credit for the anticipated road impact fees. • The applicant calculated their proportionate share, and it does not exceed the impact fees anticipated to be collected. Based on the TIS provided by the applicant and the 2024 and 2025 AUIR, the subject PUD is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. A companion Developer Agreement is proposed to address the extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard, including access to this development. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the CCME. The project site is 78.28+ acres; 47.86 acres of the site meets the LDC definition of native vegetation. A minimum of 11.97 acres (25% of 47.86 acres of native vegetation) of preserve is required and shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding whether a finding is consistent or inconsistent with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. The proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with the GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." Stormwater Management: The PUD Amendment is not anticipated to create a stormwater management problem for the area. The site is currently covered by a South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Environmental Resource Permit (ERP); Imperial Lakes # 1I- 0064-5. An SFWMD permit modification will be required prior to any proposed change in land use or development. That process will ensure consistency with all applicable state standards for stormwater systems. In addition, site development approval (SDP/Plat) will be required from Collier County, to ensure that local development standards are maintained and that proposed stormwater system(s) are designed consistent with relevant LDC and County Ordinances for water quality and water quantity, during both the interim construction phase and final implementation. PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 8 of 22 February 19, 2026 Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff have reviewed the petition to address environmental concerns. The preserve requirement is 11.97 acres (25% of 47.86 acres of native vegetation). Ordinance 82-81 required approximately 12.26 acres of preservation for the property. The petitioner proposes 15.45 acres for preservation per the PUD Master Plan. This request is to change the configuration of the preserve and location of the preserve. The preserve will include four separate areas of preservation. Two preservation areas are located centrally, adjacent to a proposed lake, and two preservation areas will be located along the east boundary of the subject property. The native vegetation will be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. The environmental data indicates that the proposed project is in an area with the potential to host a variety of protected animal species. The listed species survey revealed twenty-two gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrows were observed onsite. The burrows are in the northwestern portion of the subject property (Page 42 of 62 of the petitioner's Environmental Data included in Attachment D). A gopher tortoise relocation permit will need to be obtained from the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) prior to approval of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) and/or Plat and Plans (PPL). The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) wildlife data indicates the presence of Blackbear (Ursus americanus floridanus) in the area. A black bear management plan must be included in the SDP or PPL review. Lastly, the property contains an active bald eagle's nest, which will require an incidental take permit from the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and a bald eagle management plan as part of the SDP/PPL review. The proposed project is located within the FWS consultation area for Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridanus). The property contains five observed cavity trees (Page 52 of 62 of the Environmental Data included in Attachment D). A Bonneted Bat visual survey was conducted on the subject property; however, no evidence was found indicating the trees were being utilized for nesting. Landscape Review: The buffers labeled on the Master Plan are consistent with the LDC. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Utility Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the north wastewater service area of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (CCWSD). Water and wastewater services are or will be available via infrastructure within the adjacent right-of-way. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. Developer commitments are listed in Exhibit F under the "UTILITIES" section of the Draft Ordinance (Attachment A). Any improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utilities acceptance. PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 9 of 22 February 19, 2026 Zoning Services Review: Zoning Division staff has evaluated the proposed uses, intensity, and development standards related to compatibility. Proposed additional uses and revised dimensional standards are in Exhibit A, Residential Tract Principal Uses, and Exhibit B, Development Standards of the Draft Ordinance (Attachment A). The proposed additional residential unit types are less intense than the currently approved multifamily unit type, contributing to compatibility with the surrounding uses. To promote the project's compatibility with the abutting single-family neighborhood, staff recommends that unit types abutting the Castlewood at Imperial PUD be limited to single-family detached, townhouse, or two-family. This ensures the existing single-family homeowners will be in view of buildings of a compatible scale, with a maximum building height of 35 feet (zoned height) / 45 feet (actual height). As an additional compatibility measure, staff recommends adding a developer commitment that the RPUD shall conform with "Dark Sky" lighting design principles (flat panel, full cut-off fixtures -backlight, up light and glare [BUG] ration where U-0) to avoid light trespass onto adjacent property. Site lighting fixtures will have a maximum color temperature of 3000 K. Related to development standards, LDC Section 4.07.02.E. governs minimum dimensional standards for PUDs and provides that ...dimensional standards within any tract or increment of the proposed PUD shall conform to the minimum dimensional and other standards of the zoning district to which it most closely resembles in type, density, and intensity of use. Where there is uncertainty, the more restrictive standards shall apply. Analysis of the development standards proposed for multifamily, single family, and townhouse unit types is provided below. Dimensional standards for multifamily development Below is a comparison of the proposed changes in contrast to the currently approved Imperial Lakes PUD, which only permits multifamily dwellings, and in contrast to the standards of the zoning district, the proposed multifamily project density of 5.5 units per acre most closely resembles that of the RMF-6 zoning district. This comparison shows that the minimum unit area is proposed to be smaller; the minimum yards are proposed to be smaller; and the proposed maximum height is measured in feet rather than stories, compared to the current approved PUD. PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 10 of 22 February 19, 2026 Table 1: Multifamily Standards (Current vs. Proposed vs. RMF-6 Zoning District) Multifamily Ord.82-81 Proposed RMF-6 (current Imperial Zoning Dimensional Standards Lakes PUD) PUD Amendment District Minimum Floor Area (per unit) 1,000 sq. feet 700 sq. feet 750 sq. feet Minimum Setbacks Front (Multi -family structure) 50 feet from back 20 feet* 30 feet of curb Front (Accessory structure) 30 feet from back 20 feet* 30 feet of curb Side Yard %2 Building height, 10 feet 15 feet not less than 10 feet Rear Yard 25 feet 10 feet** 20 feet Maximum Height 5 stories 60 feet (zoned) 35 feet 70 feet (actual) Notes: * Front -facing garages shall provide a minimum of 23 feet from the sidewalk to the garage and may be reduced to 15 feet for side -entry garages. ** Rear yard may be reduced to 0 feet where abutting open space, water management, or landscape buffer tract, providing architectural bank treatment is incorporated into design. Dimensional standards for single-family development To determine compatibility of the proposed development with the surrounding residential neighborhoods, a comparison is shown below showing the dimensional standards that apply to the abutting Castlewood at Imperial PUD, which only permits single family dwellings, in contrast to the standards of the zoning district the proposed single family project density of 4 units per acre most closely resembles, which is the RSF-4 zoning district. This comparison shows that the minimum lot area and lot width are proposed to be smaller, and the minimum yards are proposed to be smaller; building heights are proposed to be consistent. PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 11 of 22 February 19, 2026 Table 2: Single Family Residential Standards (Castlewood at Imperial PUD vs. Proposed vs. RSF-4 Zoning District) Single Family Castlewood at Proposed RSF-4 Imperial PUD Dimensional Standards (Ord. No. 01-16) PUD Amendment Zoning District Minimum Lot Area 12,000 sq. feet 5,000 sq. feet 7,500 sq. feet Minimum Lot Width 85 feet 50 feet 70 feet (Interior) Minimum Lot Width 95 feet n/a 75 feet (Corner) Minimum Lot Width 75 feet n/a n/a (Cul-de-Sac) Minimum Lot Depth n/a 100 feet n/a Minimum Setbacks Front Yard 25 feet 20 feet* 25 feet Side Yard 7.5 feet 5 feet 7.5 feet Rear Yard 20 feet 10 feet** 25 feet Maximum Height 35 feet 35 feet (zoned) 35 feet (Principal Structure) 45 feet (actual) Notes: * Front -facing garages shall provide a minimum of 23 feet from the sidewalk to the garage and may be reduced to 15 feet for side -entry garages. ** Rear yard may be reduced to 0 feet where abutting open space, water management, or landscape buffer tract, providing architectural bank treatment is incorporated into design. Dimensional standards for townhouse development The County standards that most closely resemble the proposed townhouse development are found in LDC Section 5.05.07. The table that follows compares County standards for townhouse development with the proposed standards for the Imperial Lakes RPUD, as found in the Development Standards Table I in Exhibit B of the draft Ordinance (Attachment A). This comparison shows that the minimum lot area and lot width are proposed to be smaller, and the minimum yards are proposed to be generally consistent. PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 12 of 22 February 19, 2026 Table 3: Townhouse Standards (Proposed vs. LDC Section 5.05.07) Townhouse Proposed Imperial LDC Sec. 5.05.07 Development Lakes RPUD Townhouse Standard Develo ment Minimum Lot Area 1,600 s . feet 2,500 s . feet Minimum Lot Width 16 feet 30 feet Minimum Front Yard 20 feet* 20 feet 0 feet, otherwise 10 feet or 0 feet if attached, 5 feet if %2 the sum of the heights Minimum Side Yard detached of wall facing each other, whichever is greater Minimum Rear Yard 10 feet** 10 feet Maximum Height 35 feet (zoned) n/a 45 feet actual Notes: * Front -facing garages shall provide a minimum of 23 feet from the sidewalk to the garage and may be reduced to 15 feet for side -entry garages. ** Rear yard may be reduced to 0 feet where abutting open space, water management, or landscape buffer tract, providing architectural bank treatment is incorporated into design. In summary, the review of dimensional standards: • Proposed multifamily standards for minimum unit area and minimum yards are proposed to be smaller than the comparable RMF-6 zoning district. • Proposed single family standards for minimum lot area, lot width, and minimum yards are proposed to be smaller than the comparable RSF-4 zoning district. • Proposed townhouse standards for minimum lot area and lot width are proposed to be smaller than standards of LDC. Sec. 5.05.07 for townhouse development. Variations from minimum comparable standards may be approved if the PUD demonstrates unique or innovative design per LDC Section 4.07.02.E.2. The Master Plan provides for preservation of native vegetation that exceeds the minimum required preserve area (11.97 acres of preserve is required per the LDC; Ordinance 82-81 required approximately 12.26 acres of preserve; the petitioner is proposing 15.45 acres of preserve) which is an example of unique and innovative design per LDC Section 4.07.02.E.2.f. by providing for the integration and preservation of natural resources and areas of unusual beauty or importance to the natural ecosystem. The petitioner requests a deviation to allow the location of preserved land to align with Special Treatment overlays positioned in the property's south and east and the location of an eagle nest along the property's eastern boundary. To improve compatibility where the proposed PUD abuts the high school and Castlewood at Imperial PUD to the east, the Railhead Scrub Preserve to the west, and Imperial Golf Club to the south, staff recommends increasing the proposed minimum rear yard setback of 10 feet to 20 feet for all unit types (with no option to reduce to 0 feet where abutting open space or a landscape buffer tract). As an additional compatibility measure, staff recommends adding a developer commitment that the RPUD shall conform with "Dark Sky" lighting design principles (flat panel, full cut-off fixtures -backlight, up light and glare [BUG] ration where U- PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 13 of 22 February 19, 2026 0) to avoid light trespass onto adjacent property. Site lighting fixtures will have a maximum color temperature of 3000 K. CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS: The petitioner has a pending request to vacate (VAC-PL20260000213) the 30-foot-wide Roadway Easement over the thirty (30) feet of the south line of the northeast quarter of Section 15, recorded in Official Records 238, Page 913, which is a portion of a sixty (60) foot wide roadway easement. The Roadway Easement encumbers the southern thirty (30) feet of the Property. The request is pending review by various County Departments, and the Board will make the final decision of the County Commissioners. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08." (Zoning Division staff responses are in non - bold). a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The surrounding area is a mixed development pattern. To the east is Aubrey Rogers High School, zoned Agricultural (A), and Castlewood at Imperial PUD, approved by Ord. No. 01-16 for 34 units, and built out with 31 single family homes on 21.16 acres (equates to 1.47 units per acre). To the south is the Imperial Golf Club golf course and residences, zoned GC and RMF-16. The Krehling Industries PUD is also to the southwest. To the north and west lies the Railhead Scrub Preserve, an environmentally sensitive area managed by Collier County. The site is located on the south side of the future extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard. The extension of the east -west corridor has been planned for over 40 years. Stormwater Management review staff found that the PUD Amendment is not anticipated to create a stormwater management problem for the area. Water and wastewater mains are or will be available along Veterans Memorial Boulevard. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the project. Any improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utilities acceptance. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which the County Attorney's Office reviewed, demonstrate unified control of the property. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, policies, and the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis on conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 14 of 22 February 19, 2026 staff report on page 6. Staff concludes the proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with the GMP. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The Imperial Lakes PUD is approved to allow 430 multi -family units. As part of Resolution No. 97-72, "the density of the PUD has been determined to be vested." This vesting is based on the exemption approved pursuant to the Zoning Re -Evaluation Ordinance No. 90-23. Approval of the exemption precluded the County from applying a down -zoning to the property, resulting in the PUD zoning remaining in effect and continuing to allow 430 multifamily units. The proposed amendment is to also allow single family detached, townhouse, and two-family dwelling units as an alternative to the previously approved multifamily unit type. The alternative is to allow up to 313 of a combination of multifamily, single family detached, two family, and townhouse units, subject to a trip cap not to exceed 290 peak hour two-way trips. The previously approved maximum building height was five stories, and the proposed maximum multifamily building height is 60 feet (zoned) and 70 feet (actual), consistent with the previous approval. The surrounding area is developed with single family and multi -family dwellings, making the proposed additional types of dwelling units consistent with the existing pattern of development in the area. To promote the project's compatibility with the abutting single-family neighborhood, staff recommends that unit types abutting the Castlewood at Imperial PUD be limited to single-family detached, townhouse, or two-family. This ensures the existing single-family homeowners will be in view of buildings of compatible scale, with a maximum building height of 35 feet (zoned height) / 45 feet (actual height). To improve compatibility where the proposed PUD abuts the high school and Castlewood at Imperial PUD to the east, the Railhead Scrub Preserve to the west, and Imperial Golf Club to the south, staff recommends increasing the proposed minimum rear yard setback of 10 feet to 20 feet for all unit types (with no option to reduce to 0 feet where abutting open space or a landscape buffer tract). As an additional compatibility measure, staff recommends adding a developer commitment that the RPUD shall conform with "Dark Sky" lighting design principles (flat panel, full cut-off fixtures -backlight, up light and glare [BUG] ration where U-0) to avoid light trespass onto adjacent property. Site lighting fixtures will have a maximum color temperature of 3000 K. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. Usable open space will be provided as required by the LDC; the PUD Master Plan (Exhibit C of the draft Ordinance in Attachment A) indicates the minimum 60% open space requirement will be met with at least 46 acres of open space. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 15 of 22 February 19, 2026 Development will be contingent on the extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard to provide access to the site. Exhibit F of the draft Ordinance (Attachment A) includes Transportation commitments that the owner at its cost shall provide left and right turn storage lanes on CR-887 at the project entrance road; the PUD shall be limited to a maximum of 290 p.m. peak hour two- way trips; and the owner shall pay Collier County their proportionate share for the cost of a traffic signal at the intersection of Veteran's Memorial Boulevard and Livingston Road prior to approval of the first Site Development Plan or Plat for the PUD. Exhibit F of the draft Ordinance (Attachment A) also includes Utilities commitments that, at the time of application for PPL and/or SDP approval, offsite improvements and/or upgrades to the wastewater collection/transmission system may be required to adequately handle the total estimated peak hour flow from the project. Whether or not such improvements are necessary, and if so, the exact nature of such improvements and/or upgrades shall be determined during PPL or SDP review. Such improvement and/or upgrades as may be necessary shall be permitted and installed at the developer's expense and may be required to be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion or phase of the development that triggers the need for such improvements and/or upgrades. Transportation operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including, but not limited to, any plats and/or site development plans, are sought. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The Imperial Lakes PUD is approved and is surrounded by environmentally preserved lands and developed lands. The approved PUD boundary is not proposed to be modified or expanded. It. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Three deviations are requested. See the discussion of deviations on page 19 of this staff report. REZONE FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners ... shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable." (Zoning Division staff responses are in non -bold). 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies, and the Future Land Use Map, and the elements of the GMP. Consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and other elements of the GMP is summarized within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report on page 6. Staff concludes the proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with the GMP. PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 16 of 22 February 19, 2026 2. The existing land use pattern. The surrounding uses are described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The surrounding area is a mixed development pattern. To the east is Aubrey Rogers High School, zoned Agricultural (A) and Castlewood at Imperial PUD, approved by Ord. No. 01-16 for 34 units, and built out with 31 single family homes on 21.16 acres (equates to 1.47 units per acre). To the south is the Imperial Golf Club golf course and residences, zoned GC and RMF-16. The Krehling Industries PUD is also to the southwest. To the north and west lies the Railhead Scrub Preserve, an environmentally sensitive area managed by Collier County. The site is located on the south side of the future extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard. The extension of the east -west corridor has been planned for over 40 years. The PUD was previously approved and is vested for up to 430 dwelling units. The site is within the urban area and will have urban services available. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. This Amendment does not represent the creation of a district. The subject site is already zoned PUD and allowed to develop with residential uses; this Amendment is to allow additional types of residential uses on the property. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The existing district boundaries are logically drawn. This petition does not propose any change to the PUD's boundaries. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary; however, it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes, as the petitioner wishes to include the proposed uses and development standards specific to the subject property. Residential uses have been approved for the subject site since 1982. This PUD Amendment reflects the property owner's interest in adjusting the array of residential uses and the conceptual plan to respond to current market conditions. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Adding residential unit types to the PUD will not have any adverse impact on living conditions in the area. The PUD is approved for the construction of up to 430 multi -family dwellings on the property. The proposed changes to development standards introduce some reductions in minimum yards. To promote the project's compatibility with the abutting single-family neighborhood, staff recommends that unit types abutting the Castlewood at Imperial PUD be limited to single-family detached, townhouse, or two-family. This ensures the existing single-family homeowners will be in view of buildings of compatible scale, with a maximum building height of 35 feet (zoned height) / 45 feet (actual height). To improve compatibility where the proposed PUD abuts the PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 17 of 22 February 19, 2026 high school and Castlewood at Imperial PUD to the east, the Railhead Scrub Preserve to the west, and Imperial Golf Club to the south, staff recommends increasing the proposed minimum rear yard setback of 10 feet to 20 feet for all unit types (with no option to reduce to 0 feet where abutting open space or a landscape buffer tract). As an additional compatibility measure, staff recommends adding a developer commitment that the RPUD shall conform with "Dark Sky" lighting design principles (flat panel, full cut-off fixtures -backlight, up light and glare [BUG] ration where U-0) to avoid light trespass onto adjacent property. Site lighting fixtures will have a maximum color temperature of 3000 K. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create adverse drainage impacts in the area, provided stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage on this project are addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). Water Management and Dry Detention areas are generally depicted on the conceptual master plan. County staff will evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of SDP and/or PPL. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed PUD Amendment is not anticipated to seriously reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors, including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Adjacent properties are already developed or dedicated as preserve areas. This PUD Amendment does not constitute a deterrent to development of other properties in accordance with existing regulations. PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 18 of 22 February 19, 2026 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. The proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with the Growth Management Plan's policies, so it can be deemed aligned with public welfare and not a grant of special privilege. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the additional residential uses cannot be achieved without amending the PUD. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. The proposed developer commitments help ensure the project is not out of scale with the community's needs. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Other sites in the County do accommodate the proposed uses. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff did not do comparisons or evaluations of other sites in the course of review of this petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development allowable within the PUD would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. Public facility capacities have been reviewed as part of this petition review process. The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable GMP goals and objectives regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by county staff who are responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and staff have concluded that the developer has provided appropriate commitments to comply with the level of service standards. PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 19 of 22 February 19, 2026 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: Six deviations from subdivision regulations were granted as part of Ordinance Number 82-81. The petitioner seeks three deviations through this PUD Amendment. Deviation # 1 is to carry forward the relief from the required minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet to allow 50-foot-wide internal access easements or rights -of -way. Deviation #2 is a request for relief from the requirement for sidewalks on both sides of internal streets to allow a bike path on one side and a sidewalk on the other. Deviation #3 is a request for relief from the requirement for preserve areas to be connected on the site to allow four separate preserve areas. See below for additional discussion of the deviations. Proposed Deviation #1: (Local Streets) Relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, "Street System Requirements" and "Appendix B, Typical Street Sections and Right -of -Way Design Standards". The LDC establishes a minimum 60-foot right-of-way width for local streets. This deviation proposes to instead allow for private roads within the site to be located in a 50-foot-wide access easement or Right -of -Way. Petitioner's Justification: Number of lanes, required lane width, and other infrastructure can be accommodated within the proposed 50 foot access easements or rights of way, and the reduction in the minimum required width will provide for a more efficient and compact development project. The reduced right-of-way width will allow for more flexibility in designing the internal road network due to the presence of three separate wetland preserves and two existing lakes within the project. This deviation will not have a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community as the 50 foot right of way width is sufficient to accommodate all required elements for a local roadway. The internal roadways will be private and have no impact to the public. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommend APPROVAL, recognizing that the proposed 50-foot-wide dimension for private roadways minimizes the space consumed by roads, allowing for the preservation of environmentally sensitive site features. In compliance with LDC section 10.02.13.A.3, the applicant has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community". In compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.13.51, the applicant has demonstrated that the deviation is 'Justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. " Proposed Deviation #2: (Sidewalk/Bike Lane) Relief from LDC Section 6.06.02 A.2, "Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements", which requires Sidewalks and bike lanes must be constructed within public and private rights -of -way or easements, which are internal to the site on both sides of the local/internal accessway to instead allow the option to construct a sidewalk on one side and a bike path on the other side of the roadway. Petitioner's Justification: This deviation is warranted as the owner wishes to provide the option for separating cyclists from pedestrians within the community. The applicant has successfully utilized this in the Fiddler's Creek development, and it is well used by the PUDA-PI-20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 20 of 22 February 19, 2026 community's residents. The deviation will not have a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community and will provide a safer opportunity for both cyclists and pedestrians to move about the Imperial Lakes community without conflicts or requiring the use of the local streets by cyclists. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommend APPROVAL, recognizing the proposed design of a sidewalk and a bike lane accommodates pedestrians and cyclists without compromising safety or convenience. In compliance with LDC section 10.02.13.A.3, the applicant has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community." In compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the applicant has demonstrated that the deviation is 'justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. " Proposed Deviation #3: (Non -Continuous Preserves) Relief from LDC Section 3.05.07 A.S., "Preservation Standards", which requires preservation areas shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors, to allow onsite preserves to be non-contiguous. Petitioner's Justification: The deviation is warranted because the native vegetation areas are not naturally contiguous on -site. The proposed preserves represent areas of the highest quality vegetation (wetlands) on -site, and their locations are consistent with the SFWMD Permit application. The proposed preserves represent areas of the highest quality vegetation (wetlands) and buffering around a bald eagle nest tree. Their locations are consistent with the SFWMD Permit application. The deviation will not have a detrimental effect on the community's health, safety, and welfare. The deviation will enhance the opportunity to preserve the highest quality native vegetation on site as well as an area surrounding a bald eagle nest. There will be no detrimental impact to the community by granting this deviation. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommend the APPROVAL, recognizing the applicant has selected the highest quality vegetation found onsite. Most of the vegetation to be preserved is wetlands, separated by preexisting excavation lakes. The Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME Objective 6.2) and Collier County Land Development Code (LDC Section 3.05.07.17) mandate the preservation of existing wetland land areas as a top priority for preserve locations. Although some of the selected preservation areas are not interconnected, these areas will still provide habitat for various species and improve water quality onsite (wetlands). Environmental Services staff support the deviation request to allow the preservation areas not to be contiguous. In compliance with LDC section 10.02.13.A.3, the applicant has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community." In compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the applicant has demonstrated that the deviation is 'Justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. " PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 21 of 22 February 19, 2026 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The NIM was held on October 21, 2025, at the Headquarters Library, Sugden Theatre, 2385 Orange Blossom Drive, Naples, FL 34109. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:30 p.m. and ended at 6:15 p.m. 11 people attended, and remote participation was available via Zoom. Attendees from the Castlewood at Imperial neighborhood expressed concerns about buffering, building height, parking location, and light pollution. An attendee inquired why preserves and lakes could not be moved to improve the views for homeowners in Castlewood at Imperial. An attendee noted that wildlife, including deer, will be displaced. The agent responded to questions about any affordable housing component of the project, explaining that it was originally proposed but that the developer has removed it from consideration. See Attachment E for the NIM documentation. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does require an Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project does meet the scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Specifically, the project is within the 330-foot and 660-foot bald eagle nest protection zones, and it is requesting a deviation to allow the preservation areas to not be contiguous, as required by LDC Section 3.05.07.A.5. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the petition. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on February 9, 2026. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) forward Petition PUDA- PL20250006588 to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. Dwelling Unit types abutting the Castlewood at Imperial PUD shall be limited to single family detached, townhouse or two family. 2. Rear yard setbacks shall be increased from the proposed 10 feet to 20 feet, and rear yards shall not be reduced to 0 feet where abutting open space or landscape buffer tract. 3. The RPUD shall conform with "Dark Sky" lighting design principles (flat panel, full cut-off fixtures -backlight, up light and glare [BUG] ration where U-0) to avoid light trespass onto adjacent property. Site lighting fixtures will have a maximum color temperature of 3000 K. Attachments: A. Draft Ordinance B. Ordinance Number 82-81, Imperial Lakes PUD C. Zoning Reevaluation Exemption approval letter dated February 4, 1991 D. Application/Backup Materials E. NIM Documentation PUDA-PL20250006588; Imperial Lakes PUDA Page 22 of 22 February 19, 2026 ORDINANCE NO. 2026- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ZONING DISTRICT AND SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY (ST) TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS IMPERIAL LAKES RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 430 MULTIFAMILY DWELLING UNITS OR AN ALTERNATIVE OF 313 DWELLING UNITS INCLUDING SINGLE FAMILY, TWO FAMILY, TOWNHOUSE AND MULTIFAMILY SUBJECT TO A TRIP CAP; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-81. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD, NORTH OF IMPERIAL GOLF CLUB, WEST OF CASTLEWOOD AT IMPERIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, CONSISTING OF 78.28f ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20250006588] WHEREAS, on September 14, 1982, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 8281, establishing the Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Pape -Dawson Consulting Engineers, LLC, and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. representing N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: [25-CPS-02676/2008466/ 1 ] 118 Imperial Lakes / PL20250006588 3/17/26 1 of 3 SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District and Special Treatment Overlay (ST) to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for a 78.28+/- acre project to be known as Imperial Lakes RPUD, to allow development of the previously approved 430 multifamily dwelling units or an alternative of 313 dwelling units including single family, two family, townhouse and multifamily subject to a trip cap in accordance with Exhibits A through F attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Ordinance No. 82-81, the Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development, is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK , Deputy Clerk [25-CPS-02676/2008466/ 11118 Imperial Lakes / PL20250006588 3/17/26 2 of 3 day of , 2026. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Un Dan Kowal, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development and Design Standards Exhibit C: Master Concept Plan Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: Deviations Exhibit E-1: Typical ROW Cross Section Exhibit F: Development Commitments [25-CPS-02676/2008466/ 1 ] 118 Imperial Lakes / PL20250006588 3/17/26 3 of 3 EXHIBIT 'A' LIST OF PERMITTED USES IMPERIAL LAKES RPUD Regulations for development of the Imperial Lakes Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) shall be in accordance with the contents of this Document and applicable sections of the Growth Management Plan (GMP), Land Development Code (LDC), and the Administrative Code in effect at the time of approval of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) or plat. Statement of Compliance The Imperial Lakes RPUD was originally approved by Collier County Ordinance 82-81. The property owner reserved and provided a 50-foot-wide area for a future east/west County Road. This planned roadway is the only means of ingress/egress to the Imperial Lakes RPUD. A Zoning Exemption was issued by Collier County on February 4, 1991, which stated the RPUD is exempt from the zoning re-evaluation program in Ordinance 90-23. PERMITTED USES: A maximum of 430 multi -family residential dwelling units or up to 313 residential dwelling units in any combination of dwelling unit types, not to exceed the trip cap specified in Exhibit F, item 3.13, shall be permitted within the RPUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: I. RESIDENTIAL TRACT: A. Principal Uses: 1. Residential Dwelling Units a. Single Family Residential; b. Two family; c. Townhouse; d. Multi -family Residential; 2. Gatehouses and access control structures. 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas. 4. Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing. 5. Any other use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or the hearing examiner. B. Accessory Uses: Customary accessory uses associated with the principal uses permitted in this RPUD, including but not limited to garages, carports, swimming pools, spas, screen enclosures and utility buildings. Imperial Lakes RPUD (PL20250006588) Revised March 16, 2026 Page 1 of 12 2. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas. 3. Any other accessory use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this PUD as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner. II. AMENITY AREA TRACT: A. Principal Uses: 1. Clubhouses with cafes, snack bars and similar uses intended to serve residents and guests. 2. Community administrative and recreation facilities. Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis/pickle ball courts and basketball courts, parks, playgrounds, pedestrian/bikeways, and passive and/or active water features (private intended for use by the residents and their guests only). 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, bikeways, landscape nurseries, gazebos, boat and canoe docks, fishing piers, picnic areas, fitness trails and shelters to serve residents and their guests. 4. Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing (permitted until 90% of project sales are complete). B. Accessory Uses: 1. Any other accessory use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this PUD as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner. III. PRESERVE A. Allowable Uses: 1. Nature trails and boardwalks that do not reduce the amount of required preserve area to be retained. 2. Mitigation areas. 3. Passive Recreation areas, as per LDC requirements. 4. Water management and water management structures, as per LDC requirements. Imperial Lakes RPUD (PL20250006588) Revised March 16, 2026 Page 2 of 12 EXHIBIT 'B' DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IMPERIAL LAKES RPUD The standards for land uses within the development shall be as stated in these development standard tables. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. TABLE I PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES *2, SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED TOWNHOUSE TWO FAMILY MULTI- FAMILY AMENITY CENTER Minimum Floor Area (per unit) 1,250 SF 1,200 SF 1,500 SF 700 N/A Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 1,600 SF 3,500 SF 1 acre 5,000 SF Minimum Lot Width 50 feet 16 feet 35 feet 100 feet N/A Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 100 feet 90 feet 100 feet N/A Minimum Setbacks Front Yard *6 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet N/A Side Yard 5 feet 5 feet *7 5 feet *7 10 feet 5 feet Rear Yard *4 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet PUD Boundary 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet Preserve 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Minimum Distance Between Structures 10 feet 10 feet *3 10 feet *3 10 feet N/A Maximum Height *5 Zoned Actual 35 feet 45 feet 35 feet 45 feet 35 feet 45 feet 60 feet 70 feet 35 feet 45 feet ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Minimum Setbacks *1 Front Yard*6 SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Side Yard SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Rear Yard *4 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet PUD Boundary 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Preserve 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Distance Between Structures 10 feet 10 feet *3 10 feet *3 10 feet 10 feet Maximum Height *5 Zoned Actual 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 35 feet 45 feet SPS - Same as Principal Structure *1 - Does not apply to passive recreational uses such as trails/pathways, which may be located within internal open space areas. *2 - Community structures such as guardhouses, gatehouses, fences, walls, columns, decorative architectural features, streetscape, passive parks and access control structures shall have no required internal setback, and are permitted throughout the PUD; however, such structures shall be located such that they do not cause vehicular Imperial Lakes RPUD (PL20250006588) Revised March 16, 2026 Page 3 of 12 stacking into the road right-of-way or create site distance issues for motorists and pedestrians or where they would conflict with utility standards for required separation between utility infrastructure and buildings or structures. *3 - Zero feet if attached, 10 feet if detached. *4 - May be reduced to 0 feet where abutting an open space, water management or landscape buffer tract, provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into design. Except the setback for property in the hatched area on the PUD master plan shall not be reduced to 0'. *5 - Maximum Height for Guardhouses/Gatehouses: Zoned: 25' Actual: 30' *6 - Applies to attached or detached Garages. Front -facing garages shall provide a minimum of 23 feet from sidewalk to the garage and may be reduced to 15' for side entry garages. *7 - Zero feet if attached, 5 feet if detached. General Notes: a. Nothing in this PUD Document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in the list of deviations in Exhibit E. b. Setbacks must comply with the required separation between utility infrastructure and buildings or structures provided in the Utility Standards and Procedures Ordinance, Chapter 134, Article III of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Imperial Lakes RPUD (PL20250006588) Revised March 16, 2026 Page 4 of 12 50' ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY IN FEE SIMPLE (OR 1051 PG 1686) 60' ROADWAY EASEMENT OR 238 PG 913 AND OR 242 PG 251 I N 20' WIDE TYPED' � 0 200' 400' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ZONE: I SCALE: 1 = 400' UNDEVELOPED -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - _FUO URE 7I T€RANS #I MOR4AL LEV- - - - - (- - ooK� 951, RAGE 1686) _ _ _ _ Wp W AA W W � uW WWw WSW ZONED: A CONSERVATION COLLIER PRESERVE PROJECT BOUNDA1-,"j 15' WIDE TYPE'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ZONED:A CONSERVATION COLLIER PRESERVE LEGEND A DEVIATION R RESIDENTIAL AA AMENITY AREA L LAKE P PRESERVE FAMILY ®SINGLE (MAX. 2 STORIES) SEE EXHIBIT B, R R i wWwWWW�WWyWWWW NO B r- EXISTING 60' ROADWAY EASEMENT (OR 238 PG 913) 30' PORTION OF ROADWAY EASEMENT ON RPUD PROPERTY IS PROPOSED FOR VACATION PL20260000213 GradyMinor 0.Grady Minor and A111 Viales. 116 a7t1111 Via Dol Ecy a PAPm—vAvd*0N company Bonita Springy, Florida 31131 Civil Engineers . Land Surveyors . Planners . Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. ER 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 — m. G'raOyMinor. cem Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 �6' WIDE RESERVATION I BUFFER R R 15' WIDE TYPE'B' 1 LANDSCAPE BUFFER 6' WIDE RESERVATION / BUFFER . .. ZONED: A WWWw HIGH SCHOOL �WWWW��W \� �9G 30,W 15' WIDE TYPE'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER R TRACT "B" CASTLEWOOD AT IMPERIAL PUD PB39 PG 81-82 RESIDENTIAL -FER REQUIRED _ EXISTING 50' EXISTING 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT PB 39, PG 81-82 OR 1864 PG 451-459 ZONED:GC IMPERIAL GOLF CLUB IMPERIAL LAKES RPUD EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN REVISED u"r zozs FILE NAME: 3/16/2026 SHEET 1 OF 2 SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA: 78.28± AC VETERANS MEMORIAL ROW RESIDENTIAL AMENITY AREA PRESERVE WATER MANAGEMENT MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS MULTI -FAMILY: 1.47f AC (2%) 49.75f AC (64%) 2.2± AC (3%) 15.45f AC (19%) 9.41f AC (12%) NOTE 3 ANY COMBINATION OF DWELLING UNIT TYPES PRESERVE: 430 (5.6 DU/AC) 313 (4.0 DU/AC) REQUIRED: 11.97f ACRES (47.86f ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION X 25%) PROVIDED: 15.45± ACRES OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED: 46f ACRES (78.28f AC - 1.47f AC (VETERANS MEMORIAL ROW) = 76.81 X 60%) PROVIDED: 464: ACRES DEVIATIONS (SEE EXHIBIT E) RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.01.N, "STREET SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS" AND "APPENDIX B, TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DESIGN STANDARDS. 0 RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.02 A.2, "SIDEWALKS, BIKE LANE AND PATHWAY REQUIREMENTS". RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 3.05.07 A.5, "PRESERVATION STANDARDS". NOTES 1. ALL ACREAGES, EXCEPT PRESERVE, ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AT THE TIME OF SDP OR PLAT APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LDC. 2. PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH 4.06.02 AND 4.06.05.E.1. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. IN ORDER TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF A TYPE 'B' BUFFER, A 6-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESERVATION LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE PRESERVE WILL BE CONVEYED BY OWNER TO A HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION OR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION AT TIME OF SDP OR PLAT APPROVAL. THE 6' WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESERVATION HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED ON THE MASTER PLAN. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PRESERVE DOES NOT MEET BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER REMOVAL OF EXOTICS AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING WITHIN THE PRESERVE, PLANTINGS WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE 6' WIDE RESERVATION TO MEET THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. THE TYPE, SIZE AND NUMBER OF SUCH PLANTINGS, IF NECESSARY, WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF INITIAL SDP OR PLAT AND INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE SDP OR PLAT 3. A MAXIMUM OF 430 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS (VESTED UNITS) OR 313 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS IN ANY COMBINATION, NOT TO EXCEED THE TRIP CAP SPECIFIED IN EXHIBIT F, ITEM 3.C, SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE RPUD. Gr a dyMi n or Grady Minor anJ Assaeiales. 10B CO IMPERIAL LAKES RPUD DE: :17t1111 Via Drl Rcy mrLSr Ia1 a PApo-OVWN company Bonita Springy, Florida 31131 DALE EXHIBIT C 1— mz Civil Engineers Land Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects REVISED ME NAME: Cert. of A,th. ER 0005151 Cert. of A,th. LB 0005151 Bnsiaem LC 26000266 MASTER PLAN NOTES 12/04/2025 `Ls`-`"" """-V7-n Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 — m. CraUpMinor. cem Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 SHEET 2 OF 2 EXHIBIT 'D' LEGAL DESCRIPTION IMPERIAL LAKES RPUD THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHEAST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY OVERAND UNDER THE SOUTH THIRTY FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 10, AND ALSO ON, OVER AND UNDER THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH THIRTY FEET OF SAID SECTION 15 EXTENDING FROM THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) TO THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF SECTION 15 LESS ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND ALSO ON, OVER, AND UNDER A STRIP OF LAND SIXTY FEET IN WIDTH LYING THIRTY FEET ON EACH SIDE OF A LINE COMMON TO THE NORTH ONE-HALF AND THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF THAT PORTION OF SAID SECTION 15 LYING EAST OF U.S. HIGHWAY 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) RIGHT-OF-WAY EXCEPT THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, ALL LYING AND BEING IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONSISTING OF 78.28 ACRES MORE OR LESS. Imperial Lakes RPUD (PL20250006588) Revised March 16, 2026 Page 7 of 12 EXHIBIT 'E' LIST OF DEVIATIONS IMPERIAL LAKES RPUD Deviation 1: Relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, "Street System Requirements" and "Appendix B, Typical Street Sections and Right -of -Way Design Standards". The LDC establishes a minimum 60-foot right of way width for local streets. This deviation proposes to instead allow for private roads within the site to be located in a 50-foot-wide access easement or Right -of -Way. See Exhibit E1, Typical ROW Cross Section. Deviation 2: Relief from LDC Section 6.06.02 A.2, "Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements", which requires Sidewalks and bike lanes must be constructed within public and private rights -of - way or easements, which are internal to the site on both sides of the local/internal accessway to instead allow the option to construct a sidewalk on one side and a bike path on the other side of the roadway as depicted on Exhibit E1. Deviation 3: Relief from LDC Section 3.05.07 A.S., "Preservation Standards", which requires preservation areas shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors, to instead allow the onsite preserves to be non-contiguous. Imperial Lakes RPUD (PL20250006588) Revised March 16, 2026 Page 8 of 12 RESIDENTIAL LOT 50' PRIVATE R.O.W. RESIDENTIAL LOT 10' 4' 5' 4' 2' 10' 10' 2' 4' 5' 4' 10' PUE SOD CONC, SOD TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE SOD CONC. SOD PUE WALK/ WALK BIKE PATH I I I � I z' 2' I I I 0.00 VARIES •I+. i v ti 1 I WATER METER 7.5' 715' LOCATION SEWER CO LOCATION SAN. SEWERSAN. IN TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION INTS LEGEND U. Grady lAtmor and Associates. 11C GradyMinor IMPERIAL LAKES RPUD SCA NE:S JOB CODE �^^ 3800 Via Del Rey a PAPi—DAwmai 1 company Bonita Springs. Florida 34134 HATE: Civil Engineers . LandSurve ors . Planners . Landscape g v EXHIBIT E1 _ _ _ owl CROSS-S Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. I.0 0005151 Ousineaa LC 28000286 TYPICAL ROW CROSS SECTION SHEET 1 OF 1 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 a ww. Crady 111nor. row Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 EXHIBIT 'F' LIST OF DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS IMPERIAL LAKES RPUD PURPOSE: The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of this project. 1. GENERAL: A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is N.A. Realty Trust, Inc., 8156 Fiddler's Creek Pkwy, Naples, Florida 34114. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. B. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law." (Section 125.022, FS) C. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. D. The southeastern portion of the RPUD bordering Castlewood at Imperial PUD shown on the master plan as a hatched area will be limited to single family dwelling units with maximum height of 2 stories. 2. UTILITIES: A. At the time of application for subdivision Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) approval, as the case may be, offsite improvements and/or upgrades to the wastewater collection/transmission system may be required to adequately handle the total estimated peak hour flow from the project. Whether or not such improvements are necessary, and if so, the exact nature of such improvements and/or upgrades shall be determined during PPL or SDP review. Such improvement and/or upgrades as may be necessary shall be permitted and installed at the developer's expense and may be required to be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion or phase of the development that triggers the need for such improvements and/or upgrades. B. At the time of application for subdivision Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) approval, as the case may be, offsite improvements and/or upgrades to the water distribution/transmission system may be required to adequately handle the total estimated peak hour Imperial Lakes RPUD (PL20250006588) Revised March 16, 2026 Page 10 of 12 flow to the project. Whether or not such improvements are necessary, and if so, the exact nature of such improvements and/or upgrades shall be determined during PPL or SDP review. Such improvement and/or upgrades as may be necessary shall be permitted and installed at the developer's expense and may be required to be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion or phase of the development that triggers the need for such improvements and/or upgrades. C. In addition to two connections along Veterans Memorial BLVD, in accordance with subsection 2.2.2 of the Design Criteria (Section 1, Part 2, of the Utilities Standards Manual, Resolution No. 2025-67), the developer will provide a stub -out at the southwest corner of the PUD for future development and future looping of the water distribution system. The water main will be a minimum size of 8 inches and will be located in a County Utility Easement dedicated to the Collier County Water -Sewer District (District) by the Owner. The CUE will be shown on any final subdivision plat and will be conveyed in accordance with the Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (04-31, as amended) at no cost to the County or District, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, prior to or concurrent with final acceptance of utilities. The developer will provide an in -line gate valve immediately downstream of the last water service connection to allow for isolation of the water main stub -out and eliminating the need for automatic flushing device at the dead end. D. Common area lighting and streetlights in the RPUD will be a maximum color temperature of 3,000 K. 3. TRANSPORTATION: A. The owner at its cost shall provide left and right turn storage lanes on CR-887 at the project entrance road. B. The PUD shall be limited to a maximum of 290 p.m. peak hour two-way trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. C. Owner shall pay to Collier County its proportionate share in the amount of $29,887.68 for the cost of a traffic signal at the intersection of Veteran's Memorial Boulevard and Livingston Road and shall be paid to Collier County prior to approval of the first Site Development Plan or Plat for the PUD. D. Access to the RPUD will be provided pursuant to a companion Developer's Agreement. 4. ENVIRONMENTAL: A. The RPUD shall be required to preserve 25% of native vegetation, 47.86± acres of native vegetation exists on -site requiring a minimum preservation of 11.97± acres (47.86 x .25 = 11.97) of native vegetation to be retained. The preservation plans shall meet or exceed the requirements of the LDC. B. A management plan for the project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to gopher tortoises, Black Bear and Eagles. The management plan shall be submitted at the time of plat or SDP approval. C. The RPUD will utilize County -approved bear -proof dumpsters/trash cans for all residential and non- residential uses, with locations of dumpsters being determined at time of Site Development Plan (SDP) approval. All costs including maintenance of bear -proof dumpsters will be borne by the owner/developer. Imperial Lakes RPUD (PL20250006588) Revised March 16, 2026 Page 11 of 12 S. LANDSCAPING A. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. In order to meet the requirements of a Type 'B' buffer, a 6-foot- wide landscape buffer reservation located outside of the preserve will be conveyed by owner to a homeowner's association or condominium association at time of SDP or plat approval. The 6' wide landscape buffer reservation has been identified on the master plan. In the event that the preserve does not meet buffer requirements after removal of exotics and supplemental planting within the preserve, plantings will be provided in the 6' wide reservation to meet the buffer requirements. The type, size and number of such plantings, if necessary, will be determined at time of initial SDP or plat and included on the landscape plans for the SDP or plat. Imperial Lakes RPUD (PL20250006588) Revised March 16, 2026 Page 12 of 12 f ORD;NANCE 82- 81 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 82-2 THE COM- PREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCOR- PORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 48-23-5 BY CHANCING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "A-2 AND "ST" TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR IMPERIAL LAKES LOCATED NE OF KREHLING CONCRETE PLANT AND NORTH OF IMPERIAL WEST GOLF COURSE ; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE: WHEREAS, Paul Toppino, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the Zoning Classification of the herein described real property; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida: �. SECTION ONE: The Zoning Classification of the herein described real property'- - located in Section 15, Township 48, Range 25, Collier County, Florida is changed from "A-2 and ST" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD document attached hereto as Exhibit "A" which is incorporated h-erain and by reference made part j hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas Map Number, Number 48-25-3, as described in Ordinance 82-2, is hereby amended accordingly: �w to T East of the NEIc of Section 15, Township 48 South, fi ti Rance 25 East Co (�.. . a ti N ti _. 1 of 9 800K Div PACT 69 [.. + 4 rc� • ' ' 'r�i�.�•,. r0AN SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of notice that is has been filed with the Secretary of State. DATE: September 14, 1982 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: BY: C14�� /"e LL;MI J. REAGAN, CL C. . ' L' M , CHAIRMAN D/. ',. r• ". ,. R=82-25C PUD STAT�-OF FLORIDA ) "rrin+• COC> N OF COLLIER ) I, WILIZ M J. RFW.AN, Clerk of Courts in and for the Mentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true original of: ORDINANCE NO. 82-81 which was adopted by the Board of County Com,nissieners during Regular Session September 14, 1982. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Hoard of County Com- missioners of Collier County, Florida, this 1.5th day of Septm er, 1982. WILLIAi"I J REAMN . Clerk of Courts and Ex-officio to Board'of �f County Cannissiogers ByVirgioda �'• • De puty - • Clark ........, This ordinance filed with the Secretary of State's office the-21at day of September, 1982 and acknowledgement of that' filing received this 23rd day of September, 1982. BY . Virg magr , Deput er K6 FAU 74 2 of 9 N �L RUC •�111 • • IMPERIAL LAKES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT C DISTRICT ZONE: PUD PERMITTED USES: Multi -family dwellings; temporary sewage treatment and disposal facilitj PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES 6 STRUCTURES: Recreational and utilitarian accessory uses and structures which are customary In multi -family residential communities; administrative and sales offices, which offices may be located in temporary or permanent structures and may bo located within a residential structure. Temporary commercial fill pits. Removal of commercial fill from a prole lake shall be terminated prior to the development of dwelling units on that lake, and shall only occur in accord with standards Incorporated In a County approved commercial excavation permit. MAXIMUM GROSS PROJECT DENSITY: 5.5 units per acre. Total dwelling unit count shall not exceed 430. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: MULTI -FAMILY SITES: Minimum building setback from street: 50 ft. from back of curb for multi -family structures, 30 ft. from back of curb for accessory structures. Minimum rear yard: 25 feet Minimum side yards: One-half the building height, but not less than 10 feet. Maximum building height: 5 stories. Minimum dwelling unit floor area: 1,000 sq. ft. Minimum offstreet parking spaces: 2 spaces per dwelling unit, 11 of which shall be Improved, 1 /2 of which may be unimproved and landscaped. Planned, but unimproved spaces shall be Improved at a future date when warranted by the Zoning Director. 3of9 1 r/� BOOK ON PAGE �6J, • Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document Page 2. • MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING UNIT DISTRIBUTION: Multi -family dwelling unit distribution shall occur generally as Indicated on the approved Master Plan. Two or more adjoining multi -family sites may be joined to become a single development site. With the approval of the Director, minor changes in lot line location and in the distribution of multi -family dwelling units indicated on the approved Master Plan may be made, so long as the total multi -family dwelling unit count does not exceed 430. MASTER PLAN: The approved Imperial Lakes Master Plan shall also constitute the approved Subdivision Master Plan. STREETS: Streets within the project will be privately owned and maintained. All streets within the project shall be classified as local. EXCEPTIONS TO COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS: Article X, Section 19: Street name signs shall be approved by the County Engineer but need not meet the U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Street pavement painting, striping, and reflective edging requirements shall be waived, except at the project entrance drive and at interior intersections. Artic►e X1, Section 17.F. & G.: Street right-of-way and cross section shall be as shown on the following page. Article X1, Section 17.H.: The 1,000 ft. maximum dead-end street length requirement shall be waived. Article X1, Section 17.1.: Back of curb radii at street intersections shall be minimum of 30 feet. Article XI, Section 17.K.: The requirement for 100 ft. tangent section between reverse curves of streets shall be waived. Article XI, Section 21.: The requirement for blank utility casings shalt be waived. 4 of 9 I Kq"K 016 FAGS 72- e 6mmJ W ImperlaP Lakes, Pub! IP06� 3. HVIPE51AL. LAKES • ROADWAY TYPIOALS . Sol , . a�v' T �•,. 1 4' 4! A A A aitA$3 PERIMETER ROAD I N.T.S-. SOUTHERN' & INTERIOR ROAD N.T.S. No?as 1) SICEI,JAL.K LOLATIOW 421ES A►40 \✓ILI,- MEANCER IN AND OU'r OF'THE RI(AHT-Of-WAY 1..INQ,' Z)AD01-rIONAL UTILI'rj tASF-mew r5 oU'r51OL it'4t 4 r'-OF-WA`( WWICS AS READ. 3)Fu:ure connection may be allowed to perimeter road from soith easement. A. 12" STAaLIZED SUB(mrZADE Lr3 R ■ 3C, �• l." L1mr-ROCK r6ASE (PRIMED) I" ASPHALTIC. LON rzF-TF- 7YPE- (6-1) MOO. �. -$LOPE To MCET f.)(IST►N4 4RADS r� slC:•../aLK - b"THICK- A' WIDE SNtr r I or 2 ao�>< 016 Pact: 73 , 3 1 5, o! 9 �. ,ti 11 GRADE C, P, -ACCESS ROAD N.T.S. SEE NOTES t Lrzqv-MC) ON DETAIL SHEET IGPZ to 0 Cy :lu .Iry 47, C-D G) • imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document Page S. PUD APPROVAL STIPULATIONS. The following stipulations were made a part of the Board of County Commissioners approval of this PUD document. TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS: 1. The developer shall provide left and right turn storage lanes on CR-887 at its intersection with the project entrance road. 2. Fifty feet of right-of-way (1 /2 of a planned 100 ft. right- of-way) shall be reserved along the north property boundary to accomodate an east/west arterial road shown on the County Comprehensive Plan. If this planned east/west arterial Is deleted from the comprehensive plan at a future date, the developer shall be released from this right-of-way reservation obligation. UTILITIES: 1. All construction plans and technical specification for the proposed Utility Facilities must be reviewed and approved by the Utility Division prior to commencement of construction. 2. All on-sito and off -site Utility Facilities construction by the Developer in connection with the Development shall be constructed to County Standards at no cost to the County and shall be deeded to the County Water -Sewer District, In accordance with applicable County Ordinances and Regu- lations. 3. All customers connecting to the sanitary sewer and water distribution facilities will be customers of the County Water -Sewer District and will be billed in accordance with a rate structure approved by the County. 4. All construction of proposed sanitary sewer system shall utilize the proper methods and materials to Insure water tight conditions. 7 of 9 1 50 Ole PAsi 75 o,.wwol Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document ' Page 6. 5. Data pertaining to percolation rates for the proposed sewage disposal ponds shall be submitted with the con- struction plans to aid in evaluating the capacity of the site to handle the proposed wastewater flow. G. Appropriate Utility Easement dedicated to the County Water -Sewer District must be provided for the proposed water and sewer facilities to be constructed, when they do not lie within public right-of-way or Utility Easemen 7. Data required under County Ordinance No.80-112 must submitted and approved prior to approval of the constr documents for the project. A copy of the approved DE permit application for the sewage collection and transmit system and a copy of the approved DER permit applicat and construction permit for the wastewater treatment fa to be utilized shall be submitted to the County Utility Department. 8. The petitioner and/or his assigns acknowledges that ado water supply and pressure may not be available from tt County's Regional Water System to the project when cor structlon Is ready to commence. 9. If both adequate supply and pressure are not available the time construction is to start, building permits will i be issued until the petitioner or his assigns presents p specifications, and cost estimates prepared by a Florida registered engineer to the Fire Control District and Utl Division for their approval. These documents must she that the petitioner is able and committed to provide on - water supply or storage facilities adequate and capable meeting the water demands of the proposed developmen, .Those on -site facilities must not adversely affect the operation and safety of the existing water supply and service area. 8 of 9 I bc9K 016 rh:i 76 Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document Page 7. 10. If Interim on -site facilities are required, the Developer Is strongly encouraged to coordinate his planning efforts with Utilities Division. A joint financial cooperation and effort on the part of the Developer and other Developers In similar circumstances may permit the construction of permanent facilities In advance of the Districts schedule and financial abilities. 11. Connection to the County's Central Water and Sewer facilities will be made by the owners, their assigns or successors, at no cost to the County Water -Sewer District within 90 days after such facilities become available. COMMERCIAL EXCAVATION PIT: 1. All applicable provisions of Excavation Ordinance No.80-26 shall be adhered to. 2. Depth of excavation Is limited to elevation -7.0 ngvd. for the north lake (Lake 1) and -4.0 n9vd. for the south lake(Lake 11) and a water quality monitoring program shall be Initiated. 3. No blasting shall be conducted unless a Blasting Permit Is obtained from the County Engineer. 4. There shall be no off -site discharge of groundwater f?om the excavation pits. S. The commercial excavation shall not exceed three years In duration from the date of Issuance of the excavation permit. 6. The South.easement may be used for hauling of fill for one CL) year after start of operations of fill activity. 9 of 9 . . . ...... . .. .... . 0 r r f ORD;NANCE 82- 81 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 82-2 THE COM- PREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCOR- PORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 48-23-5 BY CHANCING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "A-2 AND "ST" TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR IMPERIAL LAKES LOCATED NE OF KREHLING CONCRETE PLANT AND NORTH OF IMPERIAL WEST GOLF COURSE ; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE: WHEREAS, Paul Toppino, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the Zoning Classification of the herein described real property; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida: �. SECTION ONE: The Zoning Classification of the herein described real property'- - located in Section 15, Township 48, Range 25, Collier County, Florida is changed from "A-2 and ST" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD document attached hereto as Exhibit "A" which is incorporated h-erain and by reference made part j hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas Map Number, Number 48-25-3, as described in Ordinance 82-2, is hereby amended accordingly: �w to T East of the NEIc of Section 15, Township 48 South, fi ti Rance 25 East Co (�.. . a ti N ti _. 1 of 9 800K Div PACT 69 [.. + 4 rc� • ' ' 'r�i�.�•,. r0AN SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of notice that is has been filed with the Secretary of State. DATE: September 14, 1982 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: BY: C14�� /"e LL;MI J. REAGAN, CL C. . ' L' M , CHAIRMAN D/. ',. r• ". ,. R=82-25C PUD STAT�-OF FLORIDA ) "rrin+• COC> N OF COLLIER ) I, WILIZ M J. RFW.AN, Clerk of Courts in and for the Mentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true original of: ORDINANCE NO. 82-81 which was adopted by the Board of County Com,nissieners during Regular Session September 14, 1982. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Hoard of County Com- missioners of Collier County, Florida, this 1.5th day of Septm er, 1982. WILLIAi"I J REAMN . Clerk of Courts and Ex-officio to Board'of �f County Cannissiogers ByVirgioda �'• • De puty - • Clark ........, This ordinance filed with the Secretary of State's office the-21at day of September, 1982 and acknowledgement of that' filing received this 23rd day of September, 1982. BY . Virg magr , Deput er K6 FAU 74 2 of 9 N �L RUC •�111 • • IMPERIAL LAKES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT C DISTRICT ZONE: PUD PERMITTED USES: Multi -family dwellings; temporary sewage treatment and disposal facilitj PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES 6 STRUCTURES: Recreational and utilitarian accessory uses and structures which are customary In multi -family residential communities; administrative and sales offices, which offices may be located in temporary or permanent structures and may bo located within a residential structure. Temporary commercial fill pits. Removal of commercial fill from a prole lake shall be terminated prior to the development of dwelling units on that lake, and shall only occur in accord with standards Incorporated In a County approved commercial excavation permit. MAXIMUM GROSS PROJECT DENSITY: 5.5 units per acre. Total dwelling unit count shall not exceed 430. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: MULTI -FAMILY SITES: Minimum building setback from street: 50 ft. from back of curb for multi -family structures, 30 ft. from back of curb for accessory structures. Minimum rear yard: 25 feet Minimum side yards: One-half the building height, but not less than 10 feet. Maximum building height: 5 stories. Minimum dwelling unit floor area: 1,000 sq. ft. Minimum offstreet parking spaces: 2 spaces per dwelling unit, 11 of which shall be Improved, 1 /2 of which may be unimproved and landscaped. Planned, but unimproved spaces shall be Improved at a future date when warranted by the Zoning Director. 3of9 1 r/� BOOK ON PAGE �6J, • Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document Page 2. • MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING UNIT DISTRIBUTION: Multi -family dwelling unit distribution shall occur generally as Indicated on the approved Master Plan. Two or more adjoining multi -family sites may be joined to become a single development site. With the approval of the Director, minor changes in lot line location and in the distribution of multi -family dwelling units indicated on the approved Master Plan may be made, so long as the total multi -family dwelling unit count does not exceed 430. MASTER PLAN: The approved Imperial Lakes Master Plan shall also constitute the approved Subdivision Master Plan. STREETS: Streets within the project will be privately owned and maintained. All streets within the project shall be classified as local. EXCEPTIONS TO COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS: Article X, Section 19: Street name signs shall be approved by the County Engineer but need not meet the U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Street pavement painting, striping, and reflective edging requirements shall be waived, except at the project entrance drive and at interior intersections. Artic►e X1, Section 17.F. & G.: Street right-of-way and cross section shall be as shown on the following page. Article X1, Section 17.H.: The 1,000 ft. maximum dead-end street length requirement shall be waived. Article X1, Section 17.1.: Back of curb radii at street intersections shall be minimum of 30 feet. Article XI, Section 17.K.: The requirement for 100 ft. tangent section between reverse curves of streets shall be waived. Article XI, Section 21.: The requirement for blank utility casings shalt be waived. 4 of 9 I Kq"K 016 FAGS 72- e 6mmJ W ImperlaP Lakes, Pub! IP06� 3. HVIPE51AL. LAKES • ROADWAY TYPIOALS . Sol , . a�v' T �•,. 1 4' 4! A A A aitA$3 PERIMETER ROAD I N.T.S-. SOUTHERN' & INTERIOR ROAD N.T.S. No?as 1) SICEI,JAL.K LOLATIOW 421ES A►40 \✓ILI,- MEANCER IN AND OU'r OF'THE RI(AHT-Of-WAY 1..INQ,' Z)AD01-rIONAL UTILI'rj tASF-mew r5 oU'r51OL it'4t 4 r'-OF-WA`( WWICS AS READ. 3)Fu:ure connection may be allowed to perimeter road from soith easement. A. 12" STAaLIZED SUB(mrZADE Lr3 R ■ 3C, �• l." L1mr-ROCK r6ASE (PRIMED) I" ASPHALTIC. LON rzF-TF- 7YPE- (6-1) MOO. �. -$LOPE To MCET f.)(IST►N4 4RADS r� slC:•../aLK - b"THICK- A' WIDE SNtr r I or 2 ao�>< 016 Pact: 73 , 3 1 5, o! 9 �. ,ti 11 GRADE C, P, -ACCESS ROAD N.T.S. SEE NOTES t Lrzqv-MC) ON DETAIL SHEET IGPZ to 0 Cy :lu .Iry 47, C-D G) • imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document Page S. PUD APPROVAL STIPULATIONS. The following stipulations were made a part of the Board of County Commissioners approval of this PUD document. TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS: 1. The developer shall provide left and right turn storage lanes on CR-887 at its intersection with the project entrance road. 2. Fifty feet of right-of-way (1 /2 of a planned 100 ft. right- of-way) shall be reserved along the north property boundary to accomodate an east/west arterial road shown on the County Comprehensive Plan. If this planned east/west arterial Is deleted from the comprehensive plan at a future date, the developer shall be released from this right-of-way reservation obligation. UTILITIES: 1. All construction plans and technical specification for the proposed Utility Facilities must be reviewed and approved by the Utility Division prior to commencement of construction. 2. All on-sito and off -site Utility Facilities construction by the Developer in connection with the Development shall be constructed to County Standards at no cost to the County and shall be deeded to the County Water -Sewer District, In accordance with applicable County Ordinances and Regu- lations. 3. All customers connecting to the sanitary sewer and water distribution facilities will be customers of the County Water -Sewer District and will be billed in accordance with a rate structure approved by the County. 4. All construction of proposed sanitary sewer system shall utilize the proper methods and materials to Insure water tight conditions. 7 of 9 1 50 Ole PAsi 75 o,.wwol Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document ' Page 6. 5. Data pertaining to percolation rates for the proposed sewage disposal ponds shall be submitted with the con- struction plans to aid in evaluating the capacity of the site to handle the proposed wastewater flow. G. Appropriate Utility Easement dedicated to the County Water -Sewer District must be provided for the proposed water and sewer facilities to be constructed, when they do not lie within public right-of-way or Utility Easemen 7. Data required under County Ordinance No.80-112 must submitted and approved prior to approval of the constr documents for the project. A copy of the approved DE permit application for the sewage collection and transmit system and a copy of the approved DER permit applicat and construction permit for the wastewater treatment fa to be utilized shall be submitted to the County Utility Department. 8. The petitioner and/or his assigns acknowledges that ado water supply and pressure may not be available from tt County's Regional Water System to the project when cor structlon Is ready to commence. 9. If both adequate supply and pressure are not available the time construction is to start, building permits will i be issued until the petitioner or his assigns presents p specifications, and cost estimates prepared by a Florida registered engineer to the Fire Control District and Utl Division for their approval. These documents must she that the petitioner is able and committed to provide on - water supply or storage facilities adequate and capable meeting the water demands of the proposed developmen, .Those on -site facilities must not adversely affect the operation and safety of the existing water supply and service area. 8 of 9 I bc9K 016 rh:i 76 Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document Page 7. 10. If Interim on -site facilities are required, the Developer Is strongly encouraged to coordinate his planning efforts with Utilities Division. A joint financial cooperation and effort on the part of the Developer and other Developers In similar circumstances may permit the construction of permanent facilities In advance of the Districts schedule and financial abilities. 11. Connection to the County's Central Water and Sewer facilities will be made by the owners, their assigns or successors, at no cost to the County Water -Sewer District within 90 days after such facilities become available. COMMERCIAL EXCAVATION PIT: 1. All applicable provisions of Excavation Ordinance No.80-26 shall be adhered to. 2. Depth of excavation Is limited to elevation -7.0 ngvd. for the north lake (Lake 1) and -4.0 n9vd. for the south lake(Lake 11) and a water quality monitoring program shall be Initiated. 3. No blasting shall be conducted unless a Blasting Permit Is obtained from the County Engineer. 4. There shall be no off -site discharge of groundwater f?om the excavation pits. S. The commercial excavation shall not exceed three years In duration from the date of Issuance of the excavation permit. 6. The South.easement may be used for hauling of fill for one CL) year after start of operations of fill activity. 9 of 9 . . . ...... . .. .... . 0 r r COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT February 4, 1991 Mr. R. Bruce Anderson, Agent Young, Van Assenderp, Varnadoe 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 33963 �E8. - 61994 3301 E. TA M1AM1 TR. NAPL,ES, FL 33962 (813)774-8282 A CERTIFIED DLUE CH[P COMMUNITY and Benton, P. A. Re: EXM-031-NN (s.econd response} for Property Described as the E 1/2 of NE 1/4 of Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East,.STRAP #482515-010.000; Owner: N. A. Realty Trust, Inc.. ZONING: PUD - Imperial Lakes (residential) Dear Bruce; Please be advised the following determination has been made by the Growth Planning Department regarding the above -referenced Exemption application. Though the subject property is deemed inconsistent and unimproved, it is exempted from the Zoning Reevaluation Program contained in the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance 90-23, pursuant to the Exemption granted below: Determination * approved Exemption Requested Development Dedications, Contributions and Conveyances (Sec. 2.4.6) Limitations 1. A determination which grants anyexemption shall exempt development only to the extent expressly contained in such exemption provision. 2. An exemption applies to the land and is therefore transferable from owner to owner of the land subject to the exemption. See enclosed memorandum from Bob Blanchard dated January,281 1991. Mr. Anderson February 4, 1991 Page 2 3. Anything in the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance to the contrary notwithstanding, an exemption may be revoked upon a showing by the County of a peril to public health, safety or general welfare of the residents of Collier County unknown at the time. of approval. It is important that a copy of this Exemption approval letter accompany all development order (e.g. Final Site Development Plan, building permit, sign permit, etc.) applications to assist in avoiding any delay in processing and reviewing of that development order application(s). Should you have any questions regarding the contents of this Letter, or the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance in general, please ::all me at 774-8282. PREPARED BY REVIEWED BY David Weeks Senior Planner Growth Planning Director cc: EXM/File DW/2.491/BA MEMORANDUM T0: David Weeks, Se�or Planner FROM: Bob Blanchardi Growth Planning Director DATE: January 289 1991 SUBJECT: EXM-031�NN, Imperial Lakes PUD, R. Bruce Anderson Agent, Request For Exemption 2.4.6 f BACKGROUND Section.2.4.6 of the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance (Ordinance 90-23) permits the following exemption to the application of the Ordinance: 2.4..6 Development Dedications, Contributions and Conveyances. The provisions of this Ordinance shall not affect the validity of any lawfully issued and effective development order (including a development order that acquired its density or intensity of use through the transfer of development rights) which was approved or issued subject to a condition that required a dedication, contribution or conveyance of a substantial interest in real or personal property to any governmental agency if: 2.4.6.1 The dedication, contribution or 0. conveyance on which the development order was conditioned has been lawfully granted, accepted by the applicable governmental agency and recorded, if appropriate, in the public records of Collier County, Florida; and 2.4.6.2 The dedication, contribution or conveyance on which the development order was conditioned benefits the public; and 2.4.6.3 The dedication, contribution or conveyance on which the development order was conditioned is in excess of those required under the Collier County Subdivision Regulations (Ordinance No. 76-6), as amended, the Collier County Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No.,82-2.), as amended, and the Collier County Growth Management Plan, as amended, and clearly benefits the public or property other than the subject property. This exemption is subject to the same limitations outlined Section 2.4.7 as all other exemptions provided for in the ordinance,. The applicant has submitted for.an exemption to the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance for the.Imperial Lakes PUD based on in the dedication of fifty (50) feet of right of way along the north property line to accommodate a portion of Livingston Road. ANALYSIS The applicant has furnished all of the information required by the exemption application. This analysis and any conclusion based thereon is conditioned upon the accuracy and validity of the facts, evidence or information as presented by the applicant. xt is clear that the referenced dedications represent a substantial interest of real or personal property. The d the time of the dedication was the sole owner of the property property owner at the time of development order approval an including the property subject to the dedication. Ordinance 82-81 is the development order that approves what is known as Imperial Lakes PUD. The development order requires the developer to reserve fifty feet of right of way along the north property boundary to accommodate an east/west arterial road (the planned Livingston Road). The development order provides that the developer could be released from this reservation if the planned arterial is ever deleted from the comprehensive plan. However, the applicant dedicated the property subject to the reservation to Collier County in the form of a Warranty Deed which was recorded in the public records of the County. The dedication will benefit the public as Livingston Road is I constructed. The ultimate construction of this corridor will provide an alternative corridors for travel in this area of the County. The Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance requires that the dedication,. conveyance and contributions that are the subject of the exemption application be in excess of the County's Subdivision Regulations (Ordinance 76-6), Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance 82-2) and the Collier County Growth Management Plana these references make it clear that the comparison is to the regulations currently in effect, not those regulations in effect at the time of development order approval. The dedication of this right of way is beyond the requirements outlined in these three regulations. FINDINGS Based on the material provided by the applicant and the above analyses, I have made the following findings: 1. The property owner at the time of the dedication of the right of way for a portion of the Livingston Road Corridor had a substantial interest in the property which included the right of way. sale owner of the property. The property owner was the 2. The reservation of fifty feet of right of way was a condition of the development order (Ordinance 82W81) approving the Imperial Lakes PUD. 3. The dedication of the right of way was accepted by Collier County and recorded in the Public Records of Collier County. 4. The provision of right of way is in excess of the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations, Zoning Ordinance and the Growth Management Plan. i CONCLUSION This application meets the criteria for an exemption to the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance under Section 2.4.6 of that ordinance and is approved. �i FEB � � 1�Ji RESOLUTION 97- 72 A RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.7.3.4 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND bEVELOPMENT CODE AFFECTING ORDINANCE 82-81 KNOWN A3 IMPERIAL LAKES PUD, EXTENDING THE CURRENT PUD APPROVAL TO FEBRUARY 11, 2002; AND PROVIDINt3 AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the imperial Lakes PUD, Ordinance 82-91 adopted on September 14, 1982, may be subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.1, of the Land Development Code LDC), Time Limits far Approved PUD Zoning Districts together with their respective Master Planer and WHEREAS, the PUD was adopted consistent with and under the provisions of the Collier County Growth Management Plan and has a valid and effective Final Sfte Development Plan approval, which approval prohibited the issuance of building permits for the PUD until Livingston Road was constructed by the County, and said road has not yet been constructed; and WHEREP,S, the density of the PUD has previously been determined to be vested; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has reviewed the PUD and has determined to extend the current PUD Zoning for five years, until February 11, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florfda that: 1. The above recitals are adopted herein by reference as if fully set forth herein. 2. This Resolution shall constitute evidence of the County's compliance with the review requirements of Section 2.7.3.4 of the LAC. 3. Pursuant to said section of the LDC, the current PUD approval is hereby extended to February 11, 2002; at the end of which time it may be determined whether the PUD property owner is required to submit to the procedures in LDC Section 2.7.3.4. 4. Prior to construction under the authority of approved Final Site Development Plan (ESOP) No. 89-134, said FSDP shall be reviewed for compliance with the LDC requirements in effect on the date of this Resolution and shall be amended to be brought into compliance to the extent that said requirements do not invalidate or require changes or amendments to the permits of other agencies and do not cause the placement of buildings and infrastructure shown on the FSDP to be changed or the buildable area to be xeduced. _�.._.-......_..._._.--�.�_�._,_..........._......._,.._-____�.."._... _........�r._..._ This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its approval. BE IT FURTHER RE30LVED that this Resolution be racorded in the minutes of this Board and in the records of the Petition Far Khich the extension is granted. vote. This Resolution adapted after motion, second and majority Done this _� day of February, 1997. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI83ION8R9 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ;' d3WIt3HT E: ;�BRQGK, CLERK �,' �, i. "•., `�1 • .ROVED AB.�TQ�•FORM' AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: .. ... ��. MARJ iE M. S DENT A33ISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY 50•zba\r�tolution PAPE - DAWSON Imperial Lakes RPUD (PUDA) PL20250006588 CCPC Hearing Backup Application and Supporting Documents Bonita Springs I Orlando I Jacksonville I Maitland I Fort Myers I Sarasota I Miramar Beach I Freeport 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 239-947-1144 PAPE-DAWSON.COM Florida Engineering Firm #39101 Florida Surveying & Mapping License #LB8694 GradyMinor a PAPS-DAWSO i company Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects August 11, 2025 Amended September 29, 2025 Ms. Laura Delohn Collier County Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Imperial Lakes RPUD Amendment (PL20250006588), Submittal 1 Dear Ms. Delohn: On behalf of our client, N.A. Realty Trust, Inc., we are submitting an application for an Amendment to a PUD for the above referenced project. Imperial Lakes is vested for 430 multifamily dwelling units. The proposed amendment to the Imperial Lakes RPUD is being requested in order to add a range of dwelling unit types and appropriate development standards for each dwelling unit type. The amendment is also intended to correct a scrivener's error that did not remove the "ST" Overlay from the County zoning map, even though the PUD Ordinance states it was removed. The PUD document and conceptual master plan has been revised to be consistent with current PUD format. Documents filed with submittal 1 include the following: 1. Cover Letter 2. Application 3. Evaluation Criteria 4. Preapp Notes S. Affidavit of Authorization 6. Property Ownership Disclosure Form 7. Covenant of Unified Control 8. Addressing Checklist 9. Warranty Deed(s) and Easements 10. Determination Letter 02-04-1991 11. Excavation Permit 12. Aerial Location Map 13. Environmental Data Requirements Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC Ph. 239-947-1144 • Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 • LB 0005151 • LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Ms. Laura DeJohn RE: Imperial Lakes RPUD Amendment (PL20250006588), Submittal 1 August 11, 2025, Amended September 29, 2025 Page 2 of 2 14. Traffic Impact Study 15. Historical Waiver 16. School Impact Analysis 17. Original PUD Approval 18. RPUD Exhibits A-F 19. Deviation Justification Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Enclosures Cc: N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. GradyMinor File (IMPLSP) Need Help? Co per Col."ty Growth Management Community Development Department GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsections 10.02.13 E; and 10.03.06.8; and Ch. 3 G.2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. File a separate application for an insubstantial or minor change to a PUD. Name of Property Owner(s) APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 8156 Fiddler's Creek Pkwy Telephone: 239.732.9400 E-Mail Address:-parisij@gulfbay.com City, Naples Cell: State: FL ZIP: 34114 Name of Agent: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP 1 Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Firm: Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC 1 Coleman, Yovanavich R Koester, P.A. Address: 3800 Via Del Rey city: Bonita Springs State: FL Zip: 34134 Telephone: 239-947-1144 Cell: E-Mail Address: warnold@gradyminor.com; sumpenhour@gradyminor.com; ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com If Property is under contract to be sold: Name of Property Buyer(s): N.A. Name of Applicant if different than buyer: N.A. Address: Telephone: E-Mail Address: Name of Agent: N.A. Firm: Address: City: City: Cell: Telephone: Cell: E-Mail Address: State: ZIP: State: ZIP: PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 1 of 11 Planning and Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive - Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www. co I I ie rcc u n tyfl. gov REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: N •A• Zoning district(s) to the N.A. Zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Undeveloped Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Residential Dwelling Units Original PUD Name: Imperial Lakes PUD Ordinance No: 82-81 PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • If required to do so at the pre -application meeting, the applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six (6) months, maximum 1" to 460' scale), and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerningthe legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: 15/ 48/ 25 Lot: N.A. Block: N.A. Subdivision: N.A. Metes & Bounds Description: See Exhibit D of the Proposed PUD Document Plat Book: N.A. Page #: N.A Property ID Number: 00153160004 Size of Property: 2,634+/- ft. x 1,268+/- ft. = 3,345,408+/- Total Sq. Ft. Address/General Location of Subject Property: of Castlewood at Imperial PUD PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 Q Acres: 78.28+/- North of Imperial Golf Club and west ❑ Commercial❑ Residential ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Industrial ❑ Community Facilities ❑ Research and Technology Park ❑ Airport Operations ❑ Other: PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 2 of 11 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N I, Industrial Undeveloped S GC, RMF16 and KrehIing Industries PUD Imperial Golf Course, residential and undeveloped E A and Castiewocd at Imperial Undeveloped and residential W A Undeveloped If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: N.A- / N.A. / N.A. Lot: N-A- Block: N.A. Subdivision: N.A. Plat Book: N.A. Page #: N.A. Metes & Bounds Description: N.A. Property ID Number: N.A. ASSOCIATIONS Complete the followingfor all registered Home Owner / Civic Association(s) that could be affected by this petition and located within I,000 feet of the subject property. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Civic Associations and Communities page on the Board of County Commissioner's website. Applicant is responsible for and shall confirm the current mailing addresses for each association as registered by the Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations. Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Imperial Golf Estates Homeowners Association, Inc. Mailing Address: 9150 Galleria Court Suite 201 Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: PC HOX 111809 City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34199 Imperial Golf Club, Inc. City: Naples State: EL ZIP: 34108 Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Castlewood at Imperial Homewoner's Association Inc. Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: City: —State: —ZIP: City: —State: ZIP: PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 3 of 11 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what subdistrict, policy, or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that subdistrict, policy, or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 4 of 11 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? No Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes ❑1 No If yes, please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 8 B of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.05. Fallowing the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment, or change, for a period of six [6] months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing, and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees, and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 5 of 11 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. Address: 8156 Fiddler's Creek Pkwy City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34114 Telephone: 239.732.9400 Cell: E-Mail Address: parisij@gulfbay.com Address of Subject Property (If available): N.A. City: State: Zip: 34119 PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: 1548 / 25 Lot: N.A. Block: N.A Subdivision: N.A. Metes & Bounds Description: See Exhibit D of the PUD Exhibits Plat Book: N.A. page #: N.A. Check applicable system: Property ID Number: 00153160004 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System X b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System d. Package Treatment Plant e. Septic System Check applicable system: Provide Name: (GPD Capacity): Type: TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System X b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: No increase in density or intensity Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: N.A. B. Sewer -Peak: NA Average Daily Demands: N.A. Average Daily Demands: N•A. PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 6 of 11 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Attach additional pages if necessary. rkM Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 7 of 11 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code H Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G.2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code The following submittal requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please upload the submittal items with cover sheets attached to each section via the GMCD Portal. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted, or processed. View sample PUD document. REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with narrative statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary Completed application with required attachments (download latest version) Pre -application meeting notes Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized Property Ownership Disclosure Form Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control Completed Addressing Checklist (no older than 6 months) Warranty Deed(s) Signed and sealed Boundary Survey (no older than 6 months) ❑X Architectural rendering of proposed structures X Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. Q ❑ Statement of utility provisions Li Statement of compliance with Growth Management Plan Environmental data requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 X Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. See Chapter 7 A. of the Administrative Code ❑ ❑X Listed or protected species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. ❑ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Historical and Archaeological Survey or Waiver 0 ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable with residential uses X Location of existing public facilities that will serve the PUD Electronic copy of all required documents Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑X ❑ Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and one (1) 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ ❑X *Checklist continues on next page PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 9 of 11 Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑X ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined ❑X ❑ Development Commitments (infrastructure and related matters) 01 Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification Li I X +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: ■ Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses ■ Exhibit B: Development Standards Table for each type of land use • Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code • Exhibit D: Legal Description • Exhibit E. List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each • Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas, pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08 A.2.a.(2)(b)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS— INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nicole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Anthony Stolts Parks and Recreation Director: ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ Stormwater Management: ❑ Fire: City of Naples Planning Director: Erica Martin Q Other: ❑ City of Naples Utilities: ❑ Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS ® Fire Pre -Application Meeting: $150.00 (Applied as credit towards fire review fee upon submittal of application if within 9 months of the pre-app meeting date) ® Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 XJ Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 Q Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 ® Transportation Review Fees: • Methodology Review: $500.00 (Methodology by Email to Staff) *Additional fees tc be determined at Methodology Meeting • Minor Study Review: $750.00 • Major Study Review $1,500.00 PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 10 of 11 ® Fire Planning Review Fee: ($300 PUD2, PUDR) ($150 PUDA) ® Estimated Legal Advertising fee: • CCPC: $1,125.00 • BCC: $500.00 ® If appiicable, an additional fee for Property Owner Notifications will be billed to the applicant after Hearing Examiner hearing date. (Variable) ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: • Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District incoordination with the County All fees are collected at the time of application. Property Notification Letters, if required by The Land Development Code, will be invoiced after the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, l attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package, l understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee far the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department i GMCD Public Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountvfl.gov Signature of Petitioner or Agent D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Printed Named of Signing Party 9/29/2025 Date PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 11 of 11 Imperial Lakes RPUD (PL20250006588) Evaluation Criteria Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staffs analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. The Imperial Lakes PUD is vested for 430 conventional multi -family dwelling units. The PUD amendment proposes to add a range of dwelling unit types including single-family detached, two-family attached and townhomes. Appropriate development standards for each dwelling unit type have been added. The development standards, while different than conventional zoning district standards, are consistent with those utilized by the applicant in other PUDs. These standards will allow the project to be developed in an innovative way due to the presence of the non-contiguous wetland preserves and an active Bald Eagle nest. The PUD will have a maximum of 430 total multi -family dwelling units or a maximum of 313 dwelling units if a combination of dwelling unit types are constructed. The conceptual master plan has been revised, and it is shown in the current PUD master plan format. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The additional types of dwelling units proposed are appropriate and consistent with the pattern of development in the area. The area to the east, north and south are developed with a variety of single family and multi -family dwellings. Veteran's Memorial Boulevard must be extended west from its current terminus at the adjacent Aubrey Rogers High School and will serve as access to the Imperial Lakes PUD. The Collier County Transportation Management Services Department Head has confirmed that County funds are available to construct the extension of Veteran's Memorial Boulevard past the project's entrance, and the applicant will be meeting with the Department Head to discuss entering a Developer Agreement, if it elects to at its sole discretion. Development of Imperial Lakes can occur following the extension of Veteran's Memorial Blvd. to the project's entrance or, at the Developer's option, following the entering of a Developer's Agreement with Collier County. The site will have water and sewer services provided by Collier County Utilities and will be obtaining a surface water management permit from the South Florida Water Management District. Based upon the findings of the PUD's Traffic Impact Statement, it was determined that the most -intense development alternative of Imperial Lakes RPUD will not have a negative impact upon the surrounding road network or cause any roadways to operate below their adopted level of service standard. It was determined that all roadways within the project's area of impact, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the net new nonvested traffic generated by the maximum development intensity of up to 313 single family dwelling units. More specifically, the existing property rights would allow for the development of 313 single-family units or as vested up to 430 multi -family units or 216 single-family or any combination of multi-family/single-family dwelling units that does not exceed the previously vested trip cap of 205 new PM peak hour two-way trips. GradMinor Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx GradyMinor 27, 2025 a vav�-owwsan company Page 1 of 11 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-] i44 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.gradyminor.com b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. The applicant is the owner of the PUD. G Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) The Imperial Lakes PUD lies within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict of the Future Land Use Map of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The subdistrict permits residential and non-residential land uses at a base density of 4 dwelling units per acre. The original PUD was approved in 1982 at 5.5 dwelling units per acre, which was consistent with the Growth Management Plan at that time. The property was determined to be exempt from the 1990 Zoning Re-evaluation Ordinance due to the required roadway dedication for the Veteran's Memorial Boulevard ROW. Policy 5.10 of the Future Land Use Element recognizes that those properties determined to be exempt or having been issued a compatibility exception are deemed to be consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. The legally vested density for the 430 multi -family development is 5.5 dwelling units per acre. This PUD amendment application proposes to add a range of residential dwelling unit types including single family, two family, variable lot line, and townhouse. The Imperial Lakes PUD was deemed consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan through an exemption determination by the County during the 1990 zoning re- evaluation program. Policy 5.1 of the Future Land Use Element permits changes to be made to projects that received compatibility exemptions provided that the change does not result in an overall increase in the intensity of development compared to that allowed in the current zoning district. The site today would be eligible for up to 313 market rate units (78.2 ac x 4 du/ac = 313). The proposed option that would include multi -family and non -multi- family units has been capped at a maximum of 313 units and the cap for multi -family only will remain at the vested maximum of 430 units. Any combination of uses are subject to the trip cap established in the PUD. The alternative development scenario of 313 dwellings would include a combination of multi -family and non -multi -family dwelling units which is consistent with the current density rating system of the Growth Management Plan. Future Land Use Element Policy 5.4 requires that all applications must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan as determined by the Board of County Commissioners. The Imperial Lakes PUD was deemed consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan through an exemption determination by the County during the 1990 zoning re- evaluation program. Policy 5.1 of the Future Land Use Element permits changes to be made Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 2 of 11 to projects that received compatibility exemptions provided that the change does not result in an overall increase in the intensity of development compared to that allowed in the current zoning district. The site today would be eligible for up to 313 units market rate units (78.2 ac x 4 du/ac = 313). The proposed single-family option has been capped at a maximum of 313 units and the cap for multi -family will remain at the vested maximum of 430 units. The proposed PUD amendments are consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Policies 5.5 and 5.7 discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl by utilizing urban areas for development before redesignating new property for urban intensity. The subject PUD is an existing and vested project. It is also an infill project due to its adjacency to developed properties to the south and east. The site is within the Urban designated area and has access to potable water and sanitary sewer facilities located within Veteran's Memorial Parkway, which terminates at Aubrey Rogers High School, located immediately to the east. The PUD amendment does not promote urban sprawl. Policy 5.6 requires that new projects will be compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses. The proposed amendments to the existing PUD are compatible and complementary to the surrounding land uses. The project was previously approved for multi -story, multi -family development. This amendment adds dwelling unit types and appropriate development standards. The master plan has also been revised to reflect changing preservation areas due to current regulatory standards, and proximity to an existing Bald Eagle nest. Objective 7, and implementing Policies 7.1-7.7, promote smart growth policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to adhere to the development character of the County. The proposed project cannot be interconnected to the adjoining propertyto the west, south or east as these lands are utilized for preservation (Conservation Collier), gated residential development and existing High School respectively. No direct interconnection to the high school is proposed; however, pedestrian access to the high school will be available via the sidewalk that will be connected to the existing sidewalk in the Veteran's Memorial Boulevard ROW. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The project will connect directly to Veteran's Memorial Boulevard, which is a designated 2- lane collector roadway, which will be extended along the project's property frontage. The property owner previously provided an easement for Veteran's Memorial Boulevard, and the easement has been identified on the conceptual PUD Master Plan. Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The project proposes a single access point along Veteran's Memorial Boulevard and provides for an internal roadway network. Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 3 of 11 Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. The subject PUD is an infill project due to its adjacency to developed properties to the south and east. Interconnection to the fully developed single-family golf course neighborhood to the south is not feasible as it is a gated community. Property to the west is owned by Collier County and was acquired as an urban preserve as part of the Conservation Collier program. Interconnection with the property immediately east of Imperial Lakes is not feasible to provide vehicular connection as it is owned by the Collier County Public School District and developed as the Aubrey Rogers High School. Pedestrian connectivity will occur via the sidewalk that will be constructed on Veteran's Memorial Boulevard. The PUD is consistent with the intent of Goal 7 and implementing policies of the Future Land Use Element. Access will be to a collector roadway as encouraged and a range of housing types are proposed consistent with the County policies. No direct interconnection can be provided to the nearby residential developments due to their developed status. FLUE Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. The Imperial Lakes RPUD is consistent with this Policy. The project will have either sidewalks on both sides of the internal loop road or an optional separate bike lane and sidewalk on either side of the local street. The project will be connected to a sidewalk that will be constructed within the Veteran's Memorial Boulevard ROW, which will provide pedestrian access to the nearby school and other residential neighborhoods. Transportation Element Please see the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by which demonstrates compliance with the Level of Service Standards for the surrounding roadways. Conservation and Coastal Management Element The PUD is consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, and specifically Policy 6.1.1. Policy 6.1.1 requires preservation of 25% of the existing native vegetation on sites exceeding 20 acres in size. The site contains approximately 47.86± acres of native vegetation and 15.45± acres are proposed to be preserved on -site in conservation easements. The Comprehensive Plan requires preservation of 25% of the on -site native vegetation, and the 15.45± acres of on -site preserve shown on the conceptual master plan represents 25% of the on -site native vegetation, which meets the 25% standard. The on -site preserve areas are not contiguous due to prior excavated areas on the property. These designated preserve areas do represent the highest quality native vegetation and habitat on -site. A deviation to permit the non-contiguous preserve areas has been requested. Policy 6.2.5 is directed at reducing impacts to wetlands. The conceptual PUD master plan has been designed to minimize impacts to the existing on -site wetlands. The preserve areas identified on the conceptual PUD master plan are wetland areas that will be preserved with permitted impacts to other wetlands on -site to be permitted through the ERP process with the Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 4 of 11 SFW and USCCOE. The wetland areas are not naturally connected; therefore, a deviation has been submitted to permit the non-contiguous preserve areas. The two preserve areas located along the eastern property boundary do abut off -site preserve areas on the Collier County Public School site and provide a buffer to an active eagle nest. The radius from the Bald Eagle nest is shown on the conceptual PUD master plan. Please see the environmental assessment prepared by Turrell Hall & Associates for a discussion on the vegetation associations on the site, and further discussion on the nearby Bald Eagle nest. Objective 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. The environmental assessment discusses the proximity to listed species and acknowledges that the site will be developed with guidelines of the Florida Wildlife Commission or regulating agencies. The site does propose preserve areas adjacent to the nearby Bald Eagle nest. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The PUD contains development standards for each residential dwelling unit type, which are similar to other previously approved projects in the vicinity. The site does contain some good quality native vegetation, and the conceptual PUD master plan identifies the locations of the proposed buffer areas and native preservation areas which provide buffers and open space consistent with the LDC requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. Usable open space will be provided within the PUD as required by the LDC and will meet the 60% requirement. Native preservation areas have been designated and are provided consistent with Section 3.05 of the LDC. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The project is subject to concurrency and adequate infrastructure must be in place to support future development on the site. There are no known capacity issues that will impact this project. Development cannot commence until the extension of Veteran's Memorial Boulevard occurs. The Collier County Transportation Management Services Department Head has confirmed that County funds are available to construct the extension of Veteran's Memorial Boulevard past the project's entrance, and the applicant will be meeting with the Department Head to discuss entering a Developer Agreement, if it elects to at its sole discretion. If a Developer Agreement is not entered into, development will not occur until Veteran's Memorial Boulevard is extended to the projects entrance. g The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The Imperial Lakes PUD is an existing PUD, which is surrounded by zoned undeveloped and developed land. Expansion of the PUD boundary is not proposed. Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 5 of 11 h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The Imperial Lakes PUD was originally approved September 14,1982, by Ordinance Number 82-81. The proposed PUD includes uses and development standards appropriate for the site and consistent with the policies expressed in the Growth Management Plan. LDC Section 10.02.08 F - Requirements for Amendments to the Official Zoning Atlas Nature of requirements of Planning Commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08 E shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistentwith the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth ManagementPlan. Future Land Use Element Policy 5.4 requires that all applications must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan as determined by the Board of County Commissioners. The Imperial Lakes PUD was deemed consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan through an exemption determination by the County during the 1990 zoning re- evaluation program. Policy 5.1 of the Future Land Use Element permits changes to be made to projects that received compatibility exemptions provided that the change does not result in an overall increase in the intensity of development compared to that allowed in the current zoning district. The site today would be eligible for up to 313 units market rate units (78.2 ac x 4 du/ac = 313). The proposed development option of multi -family and non -multi- family dwelling units has been capped at a maximum of 313 units, and the cap for the multi- family dwelling unit only option will remain at the vested maximum of 430 units. Policies 5.5 and 5.7 discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl by utilizing urban areas for development before redesignating new property for urban intensity. The subject PUD is an existing and vested project. It is also an infill project due to its adjacency to developed properties to the south and east. The site is within the Urban designated area and has access to potable water and sanitary sewer facilities located within Veteran's Memorial Boulevard, which terminates at the Aubrey Rogers High School, located immediately to the east. The PUD amendment does not promote urban sprawl. Policy 5.6 requires that new projects will be compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses. The proposed amendments to the existing PUD are compatible and complementary to the surrounding land uses. The project was previously approved for multi -story, multi -family development. This amendment adds dwelling unit types and appropriate development Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 6 of 11 standards. The master plan has also been revised to reflect changing preservation areas due to current regulatory standards, and proximity to an existing Bald Eagle nest. Objective 7, and implementing Policies 7.1-7.7, promote smart growth policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to adhere to the development character of the County. The proposed project cannot be interconnected to the adjoining property to the west, south or east as these lands are utilized for preservation, gated residential development and an existing High School respectively. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The project will connect directly to Veteran's Memorial Boulevard, which is a designated 2- lane collector roadway, which will be extended along the project's property frontage. Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The project proposes a single access point along Veteran's Memorial Boulevard and provide for an internal roadway network. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. The subject PUD is an infill project due to its adjacency to developed properties to the south and east. Interconnection to the fully developed single-family golf course neighborhood to the south is not feasible as it is a gated community. Property to the west is owned by Collier County and was acquired as an urban preserve as part of the Conservation Collier program. Interconnection with the property immediately east of Imperial Lakes is not feasible to provide vehicular connection as it is owned by the Collier County Public School District and developed as the Aubrey Rogers High School, which is an access -restricted school property. Pedestrian connectivity will occur via the sidewalk that will be constructed on Veteran's Memorial Boulevard. The PUD is consistent with the intent of Goal 7 and implementing policies of the Future Land Use Element. Access will be to a collector roadway as encouraged and a range of housing types are proposed consistent with the County policies. No direct interconnection can be provided to the nearby residential developments due to their developed status. FLUE Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. The Imperial Lakes RPUD is consistent with this Policy. The project will have either sidewalks on both sides of the internal loop road or an optional separate bike lane and sidewalk on either side of the local street. The project will be connected to a sidewalk that will be constructed within the Veteran's Memorial Boulevard ROW, which will provide pedestrian access to the nearby school and other residential neighborhoods. Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 7 of 11 Transportation Element Please see the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by which demonstrates compliance with the Level of Service Standards for the surrounding roadways. Conservation and Coastal Management Element The PUD is consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, and specifically Policy 6.1.1. Policy 6.1.1 requires preservation of 25% of the existing native vegetation on sites exceeding 20 acres in size. The site contains approximately 47.86± acres of native vegetation and 15.45± acres are proposed to be preserved on -site in conservation easements. The Comprehensive Plan requires preservation of 25% of the on -site native vegetation, and the 15.45± acres of on -site preserve shown on the conceptual master plan represents 25% of the on -site native vegetation, which meets the 25% standard. Policy 6.2.5 is directed at reducing impacts to wetlands. The conceptual PUD master plan has been designed to minimize impacts to the existing on -site wetlands. The preserve areas identified on the conceptual PUD master plan are wetland areas that will be preserved with permitted impacts to other wetlands on -site to be permitted through the ERP process with the SFWMD and USCCOE. The wetland areas are not naturally connected; therefore, a deviation has been submitted to permit the non-contiguous preserve areas. The two preserve areas located along the eastern property boundary do abut off -site preserve areas on the Collier County Public School site and provide a buffer to an active eagle nest. The radius from the Bald Eagle nest is shown on the conceptual PUD master plan. Please see the environmental assessment prepared by Turrell Hall & Associates for a discussion on the vegetation associations on the site, and further discussion on the nearby Bald Eagle nest. Objective 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. The environmental assessment discusses the proximity to listed species and acknowledges that the site will be developed with guidelines of the Florida Wildlife Commission or regulating agencies. The site does propose preserve areas adjacent to the nearby Bald Eagle nest. 2. The existing land use pattern. The subject property has developed residential properties to the south and southeast. Lands to the west are owned by Collier County and are part of the County's Conservation Collier Urban Land preservation program. Lands to the east are owned by the Collier County School District and are developed as the Aubrey Rogers High School. The PUD has previously been approved and is a vested PUD for up to 430 dwelling units. The PUD is located in the urban area and will have urban services available at the site. Further, the applicant is coordinating with Collier County to extend Veteran's Memorial Boulevard to the site. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property is already zoned PUD and is entitled to construct 430 multi -family dwellings on the site. An isolated district will not be created as a result of the proposed amendment to the PUD. Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 8 of 11 4. W ether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The PUD boundaries are not illogically drawn and reflect the entirety of property owned by the applicant. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The existing PUD provides for only multi -family dwelling unit product types. The amendment proposes to add a full range of housing types, and the potential for development of affordable housing option. These modifications are proposed in response to changing market conditions and continuing demand in the urban area for a variety of housing types. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change to the PUD to add a full range of dwelling unit product types will not have any adverse impact on living conditions in the area. The PUD is an active PUD and has the ability to construct up to 430 multi -family dwellings on the property today. The development standards and perimeter buffers are adequate to ensure that the PUD will not adversely affect living conditions in the surrounding area. The type of dwelling units proposed are consistent with those types of units developed in the surrounding communities. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect publicsafety. Based upon the TIS, the project will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion. The applicant will be responsible for completing a portion Veteran's Memorial Boulevard along the property frontage. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. Prior to development occurring on the property, a surface water management permit will need to be issued by the South Florida Water Management District. The District permit will address surface water management on -site as well as the amount of water that may be discharged off -site. The applicant is working with Collier County to address stormwater needs for the Veteran's Memorial Boulevard extension. Drainage problems will not result from development of this property. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Open space will be provided in accordance with the Collier County Land Development Code. The PUD amendment will not result in reduction of light or air to adjacent areas. 10. W ether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 9 of 11 The residential development resulting from the proposed PUD amendment will not adversely affect property values. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The PUD amendment will have no impact to the improvement or redevelopment of adjacent properties. The PUD has been in existence since 1982, which preceded any of the residential development near this PUD. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The PUD amendment is consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and LDC and does not constitute a grant of special privilege to the property owner. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used inaccordance with existing zoning. The PUD does currently permit 430 multi -family residences to be constructed on -site. The amendment adds product types consistent with the real estate market trends, which may include single-family, multi -family and townhome dwelling types. The Growth Management Plan encourages projects to include a variety of product types. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The PUD amendment to add a wider variety of dwelling unit product types does not change the scale of the currently approved project and is not out of scale with the needs of the community. The increase in density for a potential affordable housing component is in response to the need Countywide for affordable housing. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The property is already zoned PUD and permits up to 430 dwelling units. The owner of the property simply wishes to modify the PUD to permit additional dwelling unit product types, including an option for affordable housing. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The property has previously been altered with the construction of the two existing lakes on - site. Additional land alteration will be required to clear and fill the residential development pads, which is typical for most land development activities in Collier County. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilitiesand services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 10 of 11 Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. There are adequate roadways and utilities available for the site. There are no public facilities deficiencies at the present time, and none will occur as a result of this project. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. The project is consistent with the Growth Management Plan, and it is compatible with surrounding development. Evaluation Criteria- rLdocx October 27, 2025 Page 11 of 11 -t, Collier County GMCD Public Portal Land Development Code Administrative Code Zoning Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: PUD An-tendment (PUDA ) Date and Time: Tuesday 7/1/2025 at 3 : OOpm ZOOM Property Information Assigned Planner: Laura DeJohn Project Name: Imperial Lakes [PUDA] PL.#: 20250006588 Property lD #: 00153160004 Current Zoning: Imperia'. Lakes (PUD) Project Address: City: Naples -State: FL Zip: 3 411 C Applicant: GradyMinor - Sharon Umpenhour Agent Name radyMinor - D. Wayne ArnoldpkoC 2 9-947-1144 Agent/Firm Address; 3800 Via Del Rey Cisonita Spr s, ;"L 34134 y: 'Sete:_ Zip: Property Owner: N A Realty Trust Inc Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: 78.48 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: Max 313 SF Units 4 d/u per Acre iii. Proposed # of Affordable Housing Units: iv. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: V. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: vi. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vii. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#IPL.#: viii. is Project within an Area of Historical/Archaeological Probability? Pre -Application Meeting Notes 3/10/2025 Page 1 of 5 Growth Managcmcnl 01rnwunity Dovelopracnt • Piannino & Zoning 2800 North Horscshoe Drikc • \'aPlc., FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • %%%%w collicrrfjomY _,soN, Collier County J Meeting Notes 5,e-,o- AVWC-h,Q vTeS oN ?A+G,a �. t �� �• 3.a. S ¢10 Y4774chJ-C) nkA-t L � ► cit�.r c -q a b. rpm t Nfa wired: The most current Application Forms & the Property Ownership Disclosure Form are required for your submittal. Download from this link: https:1/www.co1Hercou fl. oil a�ernmentJ rowth-mana emerttldi�isionsl Fannin -and- zoninp• divisionlland-use-a lications#!I Disclaimer., inforrnation provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LAC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required date - Pre -Application Meeting Notes 3/10/2025 Page 2 of 5 Growth Management Community Development • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naplez, FL 34104 • 239-252-24M • N%m %%,. nl irrruu nt, tl ui, r PL20250006588 - Imperial Lakes PUDA - 2,-"j ! V C. P 0 s Site is 78.5 acres per Property Appraiser. Site area was 78.28 acres per Ord. 82-081. Site area was 76.81 acres per PUDA-PL20150001695, recognizing reduction of 1.47 acres due to ROW dedication. Camp Planning staff determined during review of PUDA- PL20150001695 that the original78.28 acres should be used for density calculations, due to the Imperial Lakes PUD being approved prior to Zoning Re -Evaluation Program. Zoning: Imperial Lakes PUD (Ord. 82-081) and ST Parcels 15C & 15D Past actions: • Determination Letter 2/4/91 - exemption granted from the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance based ❑n the dedication of 50 feet of ROW along the north property line by Warranty Deed recorded in the public records of the County (for Veterans Memorial Parkway). • Resolution 97-72 - extended PUD approvat recognizing density of the PUD has previously been determined to be vested and Final Site Development Plan (FSDP) No. 89-134 • PUDA-PL20150001695 seekingto add a variety of residential unit types became inactive and did not go to hearing. This PUD Amendment is for a max. 430 multifamily units (market rate) or max. 313 single family units (market rate), and add itionaLty up t❑ 320 bonus units through the affordable housing bonuses of LDC Sec. 2.06.03. for a total maximum of 750 units. Site access is proposed from Veterans Memorial Parkway extension. Provide a PU❑ Master Plan that includes all the required information on the Master Plan as outlined in the Administrative Code for Land Development, Chapter 3, Section G.1, PU❑ Master Plan Contents (items #1 through 13). If cut de sacs are proposed in excess of 1,000 feet, deviation is needed from LDC 6.06.01.J. List the deviations in Exhibit E and indicate deviation locations with symbots on the Master Plan. Also provide a document that states the deviation along with justifications demonstrating such master plan elements may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community (LDC section 10.02.13.A.3), and/or demonstrating that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivaLent to literal application of such regulations" per 10.02.13.B.5.h.A Historical & Archeological Survey or Waiver is required. Lands to west, north and small corner of at the northwest corner of the subject site is in the County's designated area of f�G�,�.r Archeological Probability. State Master Site File #CR00737 lies along the northern edge of subject property. Ray Bellows stated during Pre Application meeting that boundary survey is not required, considering that the previously approved PUD boundary is not changing_ Note: In Exhibit F, list development commitments, do not categorize any commitments with a heading of "Other" or "Miscellaneous." A Neighborhood Information Meeting is required. See Administrative Cade, Chapter 8, B. for guidance updated per Resolution 2023-211. Two public hearings are required for PU❑ Rezones: Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners. P6 ,� N.;� ThornasClarkeVEN From: 5tephenne Barter Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2025 11:15 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: James Sabo Subject: Pre-App Meeting Notes - PL20250006588 Imperial Lakes (PUMA) Attachments: PL20250006588 - imperial Lakes (PUDA).pdf Thomas, Attached is my Pre -Application notes for the referenced petition. Stephenne Barter Planner II Zoning Office: 239-252-7707 2800 Horseshoe ❑r. Naples, Florida 34104 Stephenne.BarterCcD,coliiercountyfl .gov j& Collier County affloom Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing. Pre -Application — 7/1/2025 Stephenne Barter PL20250006588 - Imperial Lakes (PUDA) Request/Proposal: The applicant is proposing an amendment to modify the PUD to add a maximum of 430 multi -family units or a maximum of 313 single-family dwelling units and appropriate development standards. Future Land Use (FLU) designation is Urban Residential Subdistrict of the Urban Mixed -Use District. Per Ordinance 82-081, the Imperial Lakes PUD was approved for a maximum of 430 multi -family units or 5.5 DU/A in which the total dwelling count is not to exceed 430. If the applicant wishes to develop the proposed maximum of 313 single-family dwelling units, the density would be 4 DU/A (313 Dus/78.28 = 3.99 which is 4 ❑U/A allowed by the ❑ensity Rating System. There appear to be no issues with the proposed change as it relates to Comprehensive Planning, as this designation allows for residential uses, including single-family and multi -family. Please list and address Policy 5.6 and Policies 7.1-7.4 ?A, G 4-1 d Z J - ThomasClarkeVEN From: Michael Sawyer Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2025 2:36 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: LauraDeJohnVEN Subject: RE: Pre-App Notes for Imperial Lakes (PUDA)- PL20250006588 Apologies, I was working on deadlines and did not see the meeting reminder. Ptease provide the fat€awing notes to the applicant. Transportation Planning; A methodology meeting by email is required and provide a note on the TIS cover sheet that the fee will be collected at the time of PU❑ submittal. Address all transportation elements of the GMP. Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. Provide trip limit/cap Commitment based on TIS using standard language. "The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the 1TE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision ,plat approval." ADDITIONALLY, A meeting is required with County staff to discuss Veterans Memorial Parkway Phase 2, directly adjacent to this development. There are issues related to the construction timing and related concerns. Respectfully, Michael Saviyer Project Manager 11 Transportation Management Services Department Transportation Planning 239-252-2926 tilicliael.saxvveLcCvcolliercouiitvfl.gov Michael Sawyer Project Manager 11 Transportation Engineering Office:239-252-2926 Michael.Sawyer@col.liercountyfl.gov From: ThomasClarkeVEN Thomas.Clarke@coiliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2025 10.17 AM To: Michael Sawyer <Michael.Sawyer@ coIIiercountyfl.gova Cc: LauraDeiohnVEN Laura.DeJohn@coliiercountyfl.gov> Subject: Pre-App Notes for Imperial Lakes (PUDA)- 131-20250006588 Z_ Collier County nifflocom �+ (.;, %a_ C� C, Hi Mike, ThomasClarkeVEN From: Mark Templeton Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2025 3:18 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN 01 e S Subject: RE: Zoning Pre-App*E�I=1 - Imperial Lakes (PUDA) - PL20250006588 Hi Thomas, Comments forth is one below: East buffer should be all Type B. Add the 6' wide reservation area outside of the preserve on the East and include the typical mote about preserves meeting b uffer requirern en ts after removal of exotics orsupplemental planting will be provided in the 6' wide reservation area..... If the property is greater than or equal to 15 acres, the Type D buffer should be 20' wide. Mark Templeton Planner III Development Review Office:239-252-2475 2800 North Horseshoe ❑r. Naples, FL 34104 Mark.Templeton colliercountyfLgov From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Collier County UNOOM Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2025 10:28 AM To: Heidi Ashton <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; Austin Grubb <Austin.Grubb@coliiercountyfl.gov>; Claudia Carmenate Claudia.Carmenate@colliercountyfl.gov>; Jaime Cook <Jaime.Cook@colliercountyfl.gov>; Cormac Gibfin <Cormac.Giblin@coiliercountyfl.gov>; Craig Brown Craig.Brown@colliercountyfl.gov>; Daniel Turner <Daniel.Turner@cofliercountyfl.gov>; David Roe <David.Rae@colliercountyfl.gov>; Drew Cody <Drew.Cody@ coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Impact Fees <ImpactFees @colliercountyfl.gov>; James Sabo <James.Sabo@coIIiercountyf1.gov>; Jessica Constantinescu <Jessica.Constantinescu@ coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Jocelyn NageondeLestang <J.NageondeLestang@colliercountyff.gov>; Jocelyn NageondeLestang EJ.NageondeLestang@colliercountyfl.gov>; Laurie Beard <Laurie.Beard@coiliercountyfl.gov>; Lisa Blacklidge Lisa.Blacklidge@coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Maria Estrada <Maria.Est rada@coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Mark Templeton Mark.Templeton@coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Michael Sawyer <Michael.Sawyer@ coiIiercountyf1.gov>; Michele Mosca <Michele.Mosca@colliercountyfl.gov>; NaplesUnda <Linda.Naples@colliercountyfl.gov>; Parker Klopf <Parker.Klopf@coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Sally Ashkar<Sally.Ash kar@coIIiercountyfl.gov,; Sarah Harrington <Sarah.Harrington@colliercountyfl.gov>; Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>; Thomas Mastroberto <Thomas.Mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercounty€I.gov>; Stephenne Barter<Stephenne.Barter@colliercountyfl.gov>; Ray Bellows <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Zoning Pre-App RESEARCH - Imperial Lakes (PUDA) - PL20250006588 Good morning all, Please see the attached Zoning Pre-App Research for: Imperial Lakes (PUDA) - PL20250006588 Collier County 0- Meeting Notes -Continued G(TjilTl �o'5 - ['G &�Dja T-Ve W 4 h L! 7. E .7, . C W� �3S 1 �e Qa-- 'QLVKA-tL Aeu C, 6 L,, �, Tirc`r Cv rYr rrc_ li+,,r 7 0 .f - S� •! G e a x- `-e c r w F-a -� e-41#rt p}'� rt, p wvF�o.uwt�w?- Qe lLL+SG a Pa- & _)3a,� Note 1: Ifsite is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Department along with a request that the}, send us a letter or email of "no objection " to the petition. Bob Middleton R.�liddleton(d na les ov.coni ,Allyson Holland AMliolland d a les ov.com Robin Singer RShi er u;nu lest ay.cori? Erica Martin enrartinLa:!ua lesnov.c•om Nnte2: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help ojj'set the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maiWain the adopted Level 4?f Service (LOS).for public, facilities. Other fees collected prior to the issuance of a building permit include building permit reviewfees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. Pre -Application Meeting Notes 3/10/2025 Page 3 of 5 Growdl Management Community Deveiopment • Planning & Zoning 2SW North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 •239-252-2400 • %vw%r ro. I I iercou ng 11,r ❑/ ThomasClarkeVEN From: Claudia Carmenate Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2025 4:19 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Utilities Website htt s: www.coII!ercoUnt fl. ov overnment ubIic-utilities water -sewer -district en ineerin -and- p ro ect- rn an age m e nt/resou rces Claudia Carmenate Project Manager I Public Utilities Engineering & Project Management J5 Office:239-252-1335 Collier Count) J 3339 Tartiiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 91 M00 M Claudia. CarmenateCcx7cclliercountyfl.gav From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Cfarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 4.18 PM To: Claudia Carmenate <Claudia.Carmenate@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Utilities Website Hi Claudia, Could you send me that link to that Utilities website and the form you mention during the Zoning Pre-App meetings so when you mention it in the Zoom meeting 1 can send it to the applicant if applicable. Thank You, 7� �farle Operations Analyst - Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2526 Thomas Clarke Operations Analyst ❑eveloprnent Review Off ice:239-252-2526 ff Collier County ThomasClarkeVlEN From: Laurie Beard Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2025 3:22 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: Pre-App Meeting PL20250006588 Imperial Lakes (PUDA) Attachments: PU❑ monitoring pre app handout 2024.docx Fallow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged PUS Monitoring pre-app notes attached. Also, please contact Cormac Giblin to discuss the Affordable Housing option at 239-252-2450. Laurie Beard Project Manager II Development Review Ofice:239-252-5782 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 Laurie. Beard(a)colIiercountyfl.gov xs_ Collier County GEMOM Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your a -mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing. PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments; Transportation Planning " The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. PUD Monitoring "One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." Miscellaneous Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. r ThomasClarkeVEN From: Craig Brown Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2025 6:06 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN NOS FS Subject: RE. Zoning Pre-App R#SZd*C1 - imperial Lakes {PUDA) - PL20250006588 Attachments: Imperial Lakes Environmental Data PUDA.doc Thomas, Here are my notes for this one. There is an existing eagle nest so there wilt need to be an eagle management plan as part of the development commitment. The preserves will require a deviation request with justifications for the request for preservations not be interconnected. 1. Please provide Environmental Data: Please provide a FLUCFCS aerial map of the subject property please include the invasive exotic plant percentage amounts and indicate which FLUCFCS are being considered Native Vegetation. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location, and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other naturalI land features, located on abutting properties. Please provide wetland functionality scores WRAP or UMAM if they have been created and or reviewed by the D E P or SFWMD. Please provide a current Listed species survey, which should include listed plants far the subject property. Provide supporting exhibits (i.e. Panther zones ect.) be sure to include Black Bear and Florida Bonneted Bat as part of the evaluation. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03. 3. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site ❑r mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.E-D; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H.1.d-e) (25% of native vegetation is required for preservation). 4. Please address how the Proposed promect is consistent with Conservation Coastal Management Element CCME Policy 6.1 and Obiective 7.1. S. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation requirements and minimizes impacts to listed species as required in the CCME, (The preservation Requirement is 25% of native vegetation). 6. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. (If found onsite). Please address how potential listed species that may be present on Conservation Collier property (East/North) will be deterred from entering the subject property. 7. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. Environmental. Data fee $2,500. Craig Brown Manager - Environmental Services Development Review Office:239-252-2548 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Craig. Brown(7colliercountyfl. gov Collier County Uffloom From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colfiercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2025 10:28 AM To: Heidi Ashton <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; Austin Grubb <Austin.Grubb@colliercountyfl.gov>; Claudia Carmenate Claudia -Ca rmenate@col liercountyfl.gov>; Jaime Cook rJaime.Cook@colliercountyf4�gov>; Cormac Giblin <Cormac.GibIin@ccIIiercountyfl.gov>; Craig Brown <Craig.Brow n@coIIiercountyfi.gov>; Daniel Turner •Daniel.Turner@ coIIiercountyf€.gov>; David Roe < David. Roe @coIIiercountyf,.gov>; Drew Cody •Drew.Cody@coIIiercountyfl.gov>; impact Fees<ImpactFees @coIIiercopnfyfl.gov>; James Sabo games.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov>; Jessica Constantinescu <Jessica.C6nstantinescu@colliercountyfl.gov>; Jocelyn NageondeLestang <J.NageondeLestang@ coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Jocelyn NageondeLestang <J.NageondeLestang@colliercountyfl.gov>; Laurie Beard LaurieBeard@colliercountyfl.gov>; Lisa Blacklidge Lisa .Blacklidge@ colliercountyfl.gov>; Maria Estrada <Maria"Estrada@ coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Mark Templeton <Mark.Templeton@colliercountyfl.gov>; Michael Sawyer/�Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>; Michele Mosca <Michele.Mosca@colliercountyfl.gov>; NaplesLinda <Linda.Naples@col lie rcountyfl.gov>; Parker Klopf Parker.Klopf@coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Sally Ash kar <,Q61ly.Ashkar@ co11iercountyfl.gov>; Sarah Harrington <Sarah.Harrington@colliercountyfl.gov>; Sean Sarrnrnon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>; Thomas Mastrobert❑ <Thomas. Mastroberto@col liercountyfl.gov> Cc: LauraDelohnVEN Laura, DeJohn@collilercountyfl.gov>; Stephenne Barter<Stephenne.Barter@colliercountyff.gov>; Ray Bellows Ray. Bellows @ coIIiercountyfl.ggv� Subject: Zoning Pre-App RESEARCH - fcnperial Lakes (PUDA) - PL20250006588 Good morning all, ; Please see the attached Zoning Pre-App Research for: Imperial Lakes This Zoning Pre�App ZOOM meeting is scheduled for today Tuesda 7/1/2025 at 3:00 m See attached link below: Zoom Invite: Topic: Pre-App Meeting PL20250006588 Imperial Lakes (PUDA) Time: Jul 1, 2025, 03:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada) �r<1 C,� 3 �• a Environmental Data Checklist The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 1. Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. 2. WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida 3. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. 4. SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. S. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3,05.07 H have been met. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans d. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered 7. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 8. Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Identify the Iocation of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the � ('..' '5C,3. location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 9. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agEiLultural operation, provide documentation that the parce](s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parce](s) are in compliance with the I0 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06. 10. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. a. Provide descriptions of each FLUCFCS code Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. a. Demonstrate on map. b. Provide a companion chart. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 11. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 12. Where off site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05,07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off -site parcel(s) if off -site donation of land is to occur. 13. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 14. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. I5. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) a. Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. b. Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. c. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. e. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 4�A_ (, -a 3 (�_,y. 16. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PU❑ rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement {EIS} document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. Collier Countv J Zoning Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20250006588 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Mike Bosi Division Director-Planning&Zoning 252-1061 Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov LiKRay Bellows Manager — Planning & Zoning 252-2463 raymond.beliows@co11iercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Hende.rlong Zoning -Planner III 252-2464 rchard.henderlong@colliercountyfi.gov Laura DeJohn Zoning - Vendor 252-5587 Laura.dejohn@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Kelly Zoning -Planner Ill 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning - Planner 111 252-4312 timothy.finn@coiliercountyfl.gov ❑ Nancy Gund lach, AICP Zoning — Planner 111 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Eric Ortman Zoning — Planner ill 252-1032 Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sean 5ammon Zoning— Planner 111 252-8422 Sean.sammon@colliercountyfl.gov 0' Maria Estrada Zoning Planner II 252-2408 Maria Estrads@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP zoning - Planner III 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke zoning - Operations Analyst 252-2526 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Anthony Stoltz Utility Planning - Supervisor 252-5835 Anthony.stoltz@colllercountyfl.gov ❑ Drew Cody Utility Planning— Project Mgr. III 252-2917 Drew.cody@col IiercountyfLgov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 bra ndi.pollard@ col I lerco u ntyf Lgov Claudia '��' Zw s "� Utility Planning — Project Mgr. 1 252-2917 Dr-�y@cal IiercountyfLgov LI 5hon Fandrich Utilities -Project Mgt -Supervisor 252-8835 Shon.fandrich@colliercountyfi.gov _ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baiuch@colliercountyfl.gov I_I Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov Michael Gibbons Structural/Resident Plan Review 252-2426 michae!.gibbons@coiliercountyfl.gov L Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring -Project Mgr. II 252-5782 laurie.beard@colfiercountyfl.gov U Sean Lintz Battalion Chief - N. Collier Fire 597-9227 slintz@northcoliierfire.com 0 Bryan Horbal Captain — N. Collier Fire 552-1367 Bryan.horbal@colliercountyfl.gov FFf' Daniel Turner Plan Examiner - N. Collier Fire 252-2521 Daniel.turner@colliercountyfl.gov L%' Linda Naples Sr. Plan Examiner — N. Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.napies @col lie rcountyfi.gov Shar A. Beddow Dep. Fire Marshal - Gr Naples Fire 241-1422 sbeddow@gnfire.org Thomas Mastroberto Gr. Naples Fire Site Plans Rev. III 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov PJ James Sabo, AICP GMP, Comp Planning Manager 252-2708 james.sabo@colliercountyff.gov Lir Parker Klopf GMP—Comp Planning— Planner III 252-2471 Parker.klopf@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Malloy GMP-Comp Planning -Planner 11 252-4329 Jessica.malloy@coiliercountyfl.gov Stephen ne Barter GMP—Comp Planning — Planner II 252-7707 Stephenne.barter@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Austin Grubb GMP—Comp Planning— Planner III 252-2834 Austin.Grubb@coIIiercountyfl.gov Pre -Application Meeting Notes 3/10/2025 Page 4 of 5 Growth Management Community Development • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 2 39-252.2400 1 WM., iercouni 1 rovI Collier County J ❑ Michele Mosca,A1CP Community Development 252-2834 Michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov Planner III Craig Brown Environmental Review -Mgr. 252-2548 craig.brown @coiliercountyfLgov ❑ Alexandra Mitchel Environmental Specialist 252-2907 Alexandra.Mitchel@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ David Roe Environmental Specialist 252-2915 David.Roe@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Lauren Murray Environmental Specialist 252-2306 Lauren.murray@colliercountyfl.gov _ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision Vend. 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov Jocelyn Nageon De Lestang,P.E. Engineering -5tormwater 252-2434 Jocel n.Na eondeLesta ngft cc) liiercount fl, ov Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack.mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov Matt McLean, P.E. Division Director - IF, CPP & 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov PM Cormac Giblin, AICP Division Director— 252-2460 Cormac.giblin@coil iercountyfLgov Economic. Dev. & Housing ❑ Sarah Harrington Manager— Planning 252-4211 Sarah.harrington@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Division Director- 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov Development Review ❑ Lisa 6lacklidge Development Review 252-2758 Lisa.blacklidge@cclliercountyfl.gov Manager- Planning Li Christine Willoughby Planner Ill 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brett Rosenblum-P.E. Development Review— 252-2905 Brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov Supervisor Pro'ect M r. Mark Templeton Landscape Review— Planner Ill 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov J Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov Ll Gino Santabarbara Impact Fees — Planner [II 252-2925 Gino.santabarbara@colliercountyfl.gov J Diane Lynch Management Analyst I 252-4283 diane.iynch@colliercountyfi.gov LJ Renald Paul Program Coordinator 252-2443 Renaid.pauf@colliercountyfl.gov Ll Connie Thomas Client Services -Supervisor 252-6369 Cons uela.thomas@colFercountyfLgov J Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov Ll Derek Perry Assistant County Attorney 252-8066 Derek.perry@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email jnu�.r'� r tft-h n.or—. W14rN4-A&,AOo tD t iL+G�1 duN�+aV, CY 1G LAW Pre -Application Meeting Notes 3/10/2025 5of5 Growth Management Community Development • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104. 239-252.2400 • col liercokip ytl,go_I Pre-App Zoom Attendance: Meeting Date: 7 aaaday 7/1/2.Q25 at ❑aM Irn trial. Lak _dAj- PL20250006588_ Planner: Laura De ohn 4S Participants (16) — ❑ x Q Find a participant thomasciarkeven (Me) !/ Craig Brown 0 CDJ aLauraDeJohnVEN 0 0 Richard's Wad 4 vsurripenhour D Cs; 0 Beard_I ClaudiaCarmenate 0 Daniel Turner. NCFR f vestradamaria CDq lantzlorraine LindaNaples V- 0 MarkTempleton 133 0 Parker Kopf C-.0 0 Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager aStephenne.Barter (/ 0 Tim Hail C r Gam--- y Growth Management Community Development Dept. ZONING STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING Meeting Date: Tuesday 7 1 2025 at 3:00 m ZOOM Zoning Operations Staff : Thomas Clarke Imperial Lakes PUDA - PL20250006588 Planner: Laura DeJohn • Applicant Submitting Request: GradyMinor—Sharon Umpenhour 239-947-1144 sumpenhour@gradyminor.com ■ Agent to list for PL# GradyMi nor — D. Wayne Arnold AICP • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) N A Realty Trust Inc. Parcel # 00153160004 ■ Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: Amendment to Imperial Lakes PU❑ (PUDA) Is Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): Maximum 313 Single Family Dwelling Units at 4 d/u per acre • Details about Project: Proposed amendment to modify the PUD to add single family dwelling units and appropriate development standards. the amendment is also intended to correct a scrivener's error that did not remove the "ST" Overlay from the County zoning map, even though the PUD Ordinance states it was removed. Cancellation & Reschedule Requests: Contact: Client Services Email: g►ndclientservices colliercountyfi gov Phone: 239-252-1036 May 15, 2025 Location: G:�CDES Planning Services\Current\Zonirig Staff Information Meru IM P L5P•gxh C MCP i14_ x f Create � ❑ X toms Fdit Convert t-Sign Rnd text artods Q a i;)D. !� Q" s.7 ROADWA) E.►sa11- :1 r❑ Ok x-fl .PG laf 1 Ofi;JaPOP 13AND OR'+_PG_'1 U 7TS>� i 1-r m �-n'1KSCAFE 11 1 AA ITER $' 'a1:�. A n-n i R I R k =-.,. _ Tom• `II r `���f }•� R IS WD—t MG A O ate AIDS aC>~:FIS A taC- 4 CAME von AT "MLAL P n L>=MND I� DFVL'iTIOV r+9s'iIIwew �35�G sn Dis.4i'�A� ��sFs�V'F ZOADA:'1'i AS��`�� �RiLtiAGE E AMI—IT� 3 R RESiD NFI;i o1e sau watt va,a wa: a: v :kA ANfL-.% AREA OR •tiiGPt3 L LAKE I0117D CK > r P PRESERVE aYrPs u CUES CILT- �r�T trL'I1119T n ... w IYPERlA7. r,nwS 1PF'G7 •� -SM PLAN AD ry 4 d C—z L Sw •N 4knlwh Imperial Lakes RPUQ Location Map ALIM� [nr cur. i3�/f .+, D a q q ii o-� L T Mi N b a I � Q C � e®� sass DAT.1 T07AL517E ARF.L 76311 AG MsWENITAL 48.43l AC E63%] AMUNnAREA L65eACEPW4 FRESERri 14.T3YAC{1.9W WAT(R}IANACEMEM 11 DDk AC[T4%) MAi1SlHM MVAS.[NG UNTS ISM NOF1:5± A_wD 311 MULTI-FA.WLl': 4X 6,6 DUMC1 • SEE NOTES SINGLEFAMLY. 313C40DOIAC] 5EEN07E3 An(mmRI.F- BOMBING 75G 0 7e DUµC) WE Nfl'T'E ± ME"i REQUIKV>'-3.9IS ACRES fSS.W_ AMES NATIVE r'EGEIATM Y_55i1 PRODDED: I 5411 ACRES 6^ pRvnDlu 6mr OEMATIUN$ 1- kmLBEF FPDM LDC SECTRH E06.0I. •STREET MSTEM ermUU1 VrS• AND APPE! um E. 71PlCAL S WM SECTIONS AND RI6d1T-OF-WAl DESIGN 5TAFDA WS' THE LDC EMABLLSHE] A YA[iNUM ✓Sa lODT RIGHT OF%%AY k7DT4 MR LOCAL SfREEn THI& OEr7ATIOF PROPOSES TO JNVEAD ALLOW FOR PRIVATE ROADS MTFNIN THE $Tff TO BE LCKAMD IN A SO FOOT trTDEACCE3S E.TSEML4T OR RIGF70F WRY. AEdEF FROM LSO SP.C•EIOX 1.oM7 AS. -ME51.RVATTWI STAHDARIIS. N7ITGN I EUgUMES PRESERVATION AREAS SHALL BE JNTERGONPECTFD "TT IB! THE SITE AND SO AUIOPSM OFT -SITE PRESERVATION AREAS OR NILOUFE CfWRH)ORS TO INSTc ALIAAti THE 0nsm PRLSEIam TO BE NON-CONTI000U5 YOTfi I. ALL AREAGM p3 UT PRESERVE ARE AP"MIMATE A.YD RHHECT TO MOOMC.A71% AT ME TIM OF 5DP OR FLAT AFPRul'AL LN ACLDRD0.YCE WITH THE EDL THE PAO]ECT TS LIMITED TO A MAMMOAI OF 43D MM.LLNG UNITS. 11HLLS6 THE DEVELOPER ELECTS TO CONSTRICT ON -SITE AFFORDABLE HOUSING- Ip A}7:ORDASLE HOUSING UNITS ARE DEVELOPED. THE MAgMU31 TOTAL WMBER OF DIrTLLIN6 BITS YERMITTEDN7THINTNF. MMTDSHALL UE nO IA%Tla,YOlII�TM AFFORDABLE ONTLlR70 UKITS MUST Be PROWDED IR ACCCIRDANCE IVITK IDC SECTION :D6. AFPORDAEU KOti % OEHS[TY WHIM AFTf THE LTOOML' AND DENSITY RO!IHSES PAOVLDED P< IBC SECTHM 7A 03, TA4UA. 3, ANY EOMBIHATIOK OF MLILTT-EAMPLY AND SIMAL FAMILY %M To E EEu THE FRIp OAP LY FXIHBIT'P. TRANWMATIUb COMMIPMENT. ITEJM C_ �C]!'•M1Itl10: _ _ fYAlw:tf u8 r ercn . y,�'.� - � .. —_ Cobh Yf3at• Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G.2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 GA of the Administrative Code The following submittal requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please upload the submittal items with cover sheets attached to each section via the GMCD Portal. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted, or processed. View sample PUD document. REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with narrative statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary Completed application with required attachments (download latest version) Q� Pre -application meeting notes Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized Pro e rty Ow;ne rs h ip Disclosure Form Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control Com P leted Add ressin Checklist (no older than 6 months) X Warranty Deed(s) Signed and sealed Boundary Survey (n❑ older than 6 months) Architectural rendering of proposed structures X Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 0 ❑ Statement of utility provisions Li Statement of compliance with Growth Management Plan Environmental data requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. See Chapter 7 A. of the Administrative Code ® ❑ Listed or protected species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. ❑ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Historical and Archaeological Survey or Waiver X School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable with residential uses X Location of existing public facilities that will serve the PUD N Electronic copy of all required documents Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additionai information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) Q ❑ Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and one (1) 8 %2' x II" copy 0 ❑ *Checklist continues on next page PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PURR) 4122124 Page 9 of 11 Original PLED document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD Q ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined ❑ Development Commitments (infrastructure and related matters) Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 7C +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: ■ Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses • Exhibit B: Development Standards Table for each type of land use • Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code • Exhibit D: Legal Description • Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each • Exhibit R List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed [Ise] Receiving Laird Areas, pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08 A.2.a.(2)(b)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: 0 School District (Residential Components); Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nicole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Anthony Stolts Parks and Recreation Director: Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay El Water/Sewer District: 0 Stormwater Management: ❑ Fire: City of Naples Planning Director; Erica Martin Other: ❑ City of Naples Utilities: ❑ Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS ® Fire Pre -Application Meeting: $150.00 (Applied as credit towards fire review fee upon submittal of application if within 9 months of the pre-app meeting date) ® Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 ® PUD Rezane: $10,000.00* plus $25,00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 ® Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet {submittal determined at pre -application meeting}: $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 ] Transportation Review Fees: • Methodology Review: $500.00 (Methodology by Email to Staff) *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting • Minor Study Review: $750.00 • Major Study Review $1,500.00 PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PURR) 4/22/24 Page 10 of 11 Fire Planning Review Fee: ($300 PUDZ, PUDR) ($150 PUDA) Estimated Legal Advertising fee: • le , CCPC: $ �• 0 00 ■ 6CC: $500.00 If applicable, an additional fee for Property Owner Notifications will be billed to the applicant after Hearing Examiner hearing date. (Variable) ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: • Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School district incoordination with the County All fees are collected at the time of application, Property Notification letters, if required by The Land Development Code, will be invoiced after the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the Sth and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to. Growth Management Community Development Department I GMCD Public Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.govlcityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDc#ientservices colliercount i. ov w Signature of Petitioner or Printed Na6ed of Signing Party Date PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 11 of 11 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20250006588 1 Joseph Livio Parisi (print name), as Vice President (title, If applicable) of N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner0 applicant=contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Q. Grady Minorand Associates, LLC and Coleman, Yovanovich R Koester, P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee': • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of 19physical presence or 0 online notarization this -day of 20 25 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Joseph Livio Parisi as Vice President Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Eff Are personally known to me ® Has produced a current drivers license ® Has produced as identification. Notary Signature: 12L"- Y CP108-COA-001151155 REV 3/4/2020 Notary Public State of Florida �1 Aaron A. Hask 1� 111» My Commission HH 635291 Expires 2/212029 Cote er County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov ww.colliercountyfl.gov PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. Realty Trust, Inc., 8156 Fiddler's Creek Parkway, Naples, FL 100 34114 Aubrey J. Ferrao, Director, President (Ownership Interest) Also see attached Annual Report If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. 01/2023 Page 1 of 3 Cottle' r County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov ww.colliercountyfl.gov e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, includingthe officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, orpartners: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, ortrust: Name and Address N.A. g. Date subject property acquired 1988 ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: 01/2023 Page 2 of 3 Cote er County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov ww.colliercountyfl.gov on reauired to have Property Ownership Disclosure. will not be accepted without this form. Reauirements I AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION I for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, 1 attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. 1 understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *The completed appli(ation, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal: littps;//cvl)ortal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityvie%-jwel) Questions? Email: GMDclientseryices@colliercountyfl.gov June 10, 2025 Agent/Owner Signature Date D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Agent/Owner Name (please print) 01/2023 Page 3 of 3 COVENANT OF CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Imperial Lakes PUD (Parcel ID #00153160004) Petition Number PL20250006588 (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in ExhibitA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Residential planned unit development ( R PUD) zoning. We hereby designate,' Wa Y h Kces� 1e9'" , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Si ature of Owner Signature of Owner Joseph Livio Parisi, as Vice President of N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. Printed Name of Owner Printed Name of Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of 91 physical presence or ❑ online notarization this day of 20 25 by Joseph Livio Parisi, as Vice President of N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. who is 21personally known to me or ❑ has produced as identification. l Notary Public State of Florida Aaron A. Haak Sign re of No Pu711/ +III My commission HH 635291 Expires 212/2029 /f/y) 1. Print Name of Notary Public PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 8 of 11 Imperial Lakes RPUD (PL20250006588) Exhibit A Legal Description THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHEAST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY OVER AND UNDER THE SOUTH THIRTY FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 10, AND ALSO ON, OVER AND UNDER THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH THIRTY FEET OF SAID SECTION 15 EXTENDING FROM THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) TO THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF SECTION 15 LESS ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND ALSO ON, OVER, AND UNDER A STRIP OF LAND SIXTY FEET IN WIDTH LYING THIRTY FEET ON EACH SIDE OF A LINE COMMON TO THE NORTH ONE-HALF AND THE SOUTH ONE- HALF OF THAT PORTION OF SAID SECTION 15 LYING EAST OF U.S. HIGHWAY 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) RIGHT- OF-WAY EXCEPT THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, ALL LYING AND BEING IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. June4, Zozs 0GradyMinor Exhibit Legal Description. docx Page 1 of I a once-nAwsau company Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engincering@gradyminor.com • www.gradymJnor.com Collier County Addressing Checklist GMCD Public Portal Land Development Code Administrative Code Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with a * are required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Applicant Contact Information *Name of Owner/Agent: Sharon Umpenhour Firm [if agent]: Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC *Address: 3800 Via Del Rey *Telephone: (239) 947-1144 *City: Bonita Springs Cell: *E-Mail Address: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Location Information *State: FL *ZIP: 34134 Fax: *Folio (Property ID) Number(s) of the subject property or properties [Attach list if necessary]: 00153160004 *Legal Description of subject property or properties [Attach list if necessary]: S 15 T48 R25 Street Address(es) where applicable, if already assigned: Not assigned Addressing Checklist 6/14/2024 Page 1 of 2 Growth Management Community Development • Operations & Regulatory Management 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104. 239-252-2400 • www.colliercountyflgov/ Collier County Project Information Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre -approval of project name and/or street name may be requested by contacting us at GMD Addressing (cDcolliercountyfl.gov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. Current Project Name: Imperial Lakes PUD Proposed Project Name: N.A. Proposed Street Name: N.A. Latest Approved Project Number [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] N.A. Submittal Requirement Checklist Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include. Checkmark the items included with this application: Requirements for Review: Required: LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. ❑x List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. ❑ E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre -approved project and/or street names. ❑ The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMCD Portal: https://cvportal.col liercountyfl.gov/citvviewweb Questions? Email: Front. Des k(a)colIiercountyfl.gov Addressing Checklist 6/14/2024 Page 2 of 2 Growth Management Community Development • Operations & Regulatory Management 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104. 239-252-2400 • www.collicrcountyf1.�ov/ ((J► IN Ttll: '1WL3N(__*"t'Il JUDIC11h CIItCUI'P IN AND KUIt (�l lat (ll )l iPtl'Y, V I 1 1It I I H1 RCC o ° PRM sr-0 v Laws of r-lorida, 1971, Chapter 28093 DO C N f Z44A0 Section 702.02 (4) , Florida Statutes 1971 lade CD l 4rocorrect uproperty ndescription.✓ T w ANNE ELIZABETH NORTH ) plaintiff o vs CASE NO. 87-0178-CA-01-HDH In w CKT INVESTMENTS, INC., FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, ) � etc . , etal .— r ^, Defendant n — � �1 N 0 i ! 9 7 40 ° 1388 JUL i � pal 12: 13 ��JpICATE OP TITU-" / �•riECORDEt� V COLLIER COUNTY r� r t— Ln c-:1 Cn M _ w 0 o C) U O to d* T$ The tu)de.rsigned, JAMES C. GILFS, Clark of the Court, certi fits tlwt tw executed and filed a certif cate._pf sale in this action on June 22nd tl'19 88,for the propRt� scAb �J4 e,and that no ot.�je�ctitans to tie_ sa]t� iulvt� time all forLCo,ty,, n+ obiva ions. been filed within t� — �rt llic r t F]crid,i: The folla+iing ProFx. q etr of Section 15, Township The East and-haf of o cn 48 South, Rapge'02 togher with an easement for under die Souk th k,y egtOf the Southeast one -quarter roadway over,, and of Section 1( �d also on, over end 'l nde�7 ­, t portion of the North thirty feet of id Section 15 d f om the East right-of-way line of U.S. 41 (T Trail) to the E t �ondary line of Section 15 less Atlantic Coastu.r, 4lroad ri h�-o and also on, over, and under gh a strip of land sixty'e Aw' feet on each side of a line common to the Noma 6 Z11-'and the South one-half of that portion of said Section 15 lying East of U.S. Highway 41 (Tamiami Trail) right -of- o way except the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad right-of-way, all lying and being in Collier County, Florida. , cs was sold tO N.A. REALTY TRUST, INC. ~ 6101 Pelican Bay Blvd., Naples, Florida 33963 o WITNESS My hand and seal of the court on July 6th , 19_88,_. '• • r. M 238 137992 TIC DIED DEED made this 4(,7 by Traverse Cprporat corporation Incorporated and existing under the laws of the !hate of Florida '­4T " whose post office address Is 365 Fifth Avenue South. I a$, Florida Inafter called the Grantor) to the grantees hereinafter named, whose post' on,glyd. nd,Rap�48. Michigan 49506., office address Is 928 Princeton S. E. ra 4 WITNESS I T 4 The,Grantor, In consideration of-,the%sum of Ton Dollars and other good i and valuable considerations, the recelpt;y"mof-vis cknowledgedp1hb .... rantsi.kargaInsi.sells, transf hereby A ars and convoys M.,an u n d 1,4 1 d a d 3/4 Inter t .... In the following described lands,to.Loonard 0sterink,and,JanIce F , UP' . husband ,and wife, and their heIrss succat.sars,.and assigns. divided. 1/4 ',interest In the following described lands to Bruce J. Osterink and Margo J. OstorInk. husband and wife, and their,,heirso-successors.and The West -half (WI).of the Northeast quor ter (NEI). except,,At lent le Coast Line Railroad Alght-of-way In Soctlon 15i Township 48 Southo Range 25 East, ubjgc'j',to­inid'together with (and the Grantor her:by rasarvess excepts, : In favor of the Grantor rants and declares) an easement for roadway signs and 9 successors and as and Grantee. and their respective heirs, also In favor of all current owners of butting land and the public on over, and under :,:trip of land sixty (60) feet In width, lying S S2 I thirty (30) feet On h side of section I thir Ins. of Sections 10 and 15 lying East of U. S. Hlghviaya-41,��rlot�,t-cf-way,ex-, cept the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad right -of! we and also is strip of land nd sixty (60) feet In width lying thirty (301 feet on each side ,of a line common to the Nurth-half (NO and South -half ($I) of that portion of Section 15 lying East of U. , Sright-of-way, mlghway 41 right-of-way except xcept.the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad gh t -of4aj, all being In Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier Cjunty, Florida. 4 TOGETHER wiWall tonements'i rten hereditaments and,appu 'ihiei"'ind,a I ' ""I , , V . A, rights, powers, privileges, titles, Interests. eitMOS,�-roiirslons. remainders easem I an ts, and'.r I - pirlan and littoral rights thereto belonging or In any wise per- i taming. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. SUBJECT to any oil, gas or mineral leases or Interests of record, and to any'" rights of way,. easements or, conveyances of record or4 t hot an accurate Sur Tslaor,- ",,Z, _iq­� 46 4i r railroads. I road$ f -mi, Inspectlo" would disclose for roads* construction of oads public utilities, telephone and power lines. borrow pits, outfoll dltc'�es and dralnsqsq,'�' A0 K. P 7-.;- MLP. V, s N 4S �« 238 nrt 914 ' STAT0e►FLOF�It�A CU�7cNYTAs'Nga"4SO0g T ! tMt2t{7�ie �xoa>Ana(>I�aoaxtoaxeha(xb(a�aoaaaaaoc i IN VIThiSS 1.'}�I•iEOFA the Orantor has signeds sealsd and delivered this deed the day and year first above mentioned. II i Signed, scaled and deli- TRAVERSE CDRPOP..ITICN vered in our presences Bye Via President ► a c i -may ATTEBT s ' Secretary STATE OF FLORI111 ) i' s.• , I r COUNTT OF coyT=R) �•, IA an officer authorised to tale acknowledgments of deeds according to the laws of the State of Florida, duly qualified and acting# . hereby certify that E. N. Parker; and George K. Wall respectively, as Vice President and Secretary of Traverse Corporation, W ® Boa = C W to me personally known, this day acknowledged before me that they executed rn o CD -Z c the foregoing deed as such officers of said corporations and that they affixed o0 a -r, thereto the official goal of said corporation{ and I further certify that I v o n n M O making said acknowledgments to be the individuals de- D r- p )MOW the said persons 0 . scribed in and who executed the said deed.Fm 1 YJJa t' a v IN tilITkiESS k1kiEREOFA I have hereunto not gT hand and official 19 seal�.hls ��� day of ���'i 67. QJ i C) g r� s Tyr E FLOPIDA •<� L Notary PYb110 r� DOCUw.E21T,.^r STAMP tAY, _ 4 v tir2re�/rrY"s t `. ' 9 RolAsn ronK saAn os noeo� r Wit 3 C 0= / YT COMMISSION tiFl4LS A►L-11. Ili? � "4 •� .w..M� .M. �. M/K1..MA• . „.. 004�1 ROWAN soft M COLLIER COUNTY. /LMDA "An"RaT T. e0017 - 01A e1 on" ago FFU pit 242 251 - 140051 Jv,19 10 07 AN'67 rT.SCOiT Ci • r• u1T Count bi.;ES ,-OJSIf. FLORIDA ;- s:ade this JI. A.'& �J IY67 by Evernie Corporation, a corporation incorporated and Wdsiiog under the laws of the 1' Stata of Florida, whose poet office address is 365 Fifth !revue South, Naples, Florida (hereinafter ctlled the Grantor) to Leven S. North, Sr. and Anne Elizabeth North, his WIN 1307 Felton Court Lutherville, Maryland (hereinafter called the Grantee). 3. 11 I T N E S S 15 T H s s Grantor, in consideration of the suss of Ten Dollars and other good and valua'.ls considerations, the receipt whereof is hereby aolmowledged, hereby grants, barEains, sells, transfer and conveys to the Grantee, and the Grantee's heir&, eucceesorr and assigns, the following described lands situate, lying and being in Cal Iler County, State of Fioridat The East-heif (Q) of the Northeast quarter (N°}) of Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, subject to and together with (and the Grantor hereby declares) an easement for roadway in favor of reserves, excepts, grants and the Grantor and the Grantee and their respective heirs, s4ccessors, and assigns and also in favo- of all current owners of abutting lands and the public on, (30) feet of the Southeast quarter (SE}) of over and under the South thirty Section 10, and also on, over and under that portion of the North thirty (30) feet of said Section 15 extending from the east right-of-way line of U. S. #41 (Taniani Trail) to the East boundary line of Section 15 less Atlantic Coast Line R.ilroad right-of-way, and also on, over, and under a strip of land sixty (60) feet In width lying thirty (30) feet on each side of a line T common to the North -half (NO and the South -half (Si) of that portion of said Section 15 lying East of U. S. Highway #41 (Tamiaml Trail) right-of-way except the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad right-0-way. TOGS:h'Fai with all tenements, hersditaments and appurtenances, mad all rights,', powers, privileges, titles, interests, estates, reversiono, remainder&, easements, and ripariaa mad littoral righte thereto belonging or in wW vies pertaining. TO HAVE AN'D TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. SUMCT to any oil, gas or mineral leases or interests of record, and to arr rights of way, ease wrte or (conveyances of record or that an accurate surrey or inspection would disclose for reads, construction of roads, railroads, public utilities, telephone and power lines, borrow pits, cutfall ditches and drainage. r, Pill, cu cr cvt tr.''ul ;�curcCA t �� �• :f aEc 242 ma 252 irzmTXKLNNXINXiK/Xlk1II2NfItlIYX2lIlI> In r. III WITNESS W"MZOF, the Orantor has signed, sealed and delivered this deed the day end year first above rAntioned. , Signed, sealed and deli— vered in our presences i EVERNIA CORPORATION 1�ys Vice President ATTESTi i J -,J 4+ a �G ' ► Secretary STATE OF FLORML COOA'I'Z OF COMM U' I, an officer authorized to take acknowledgments of deeds .'�• `�' ' according to the laws of the State of Florida, duly qualified and acting, hereby certify that E. N. Parker abd George K. Mall respectively, as Vice President and Secretary of Evernla Corporation, to as persona.117 known, this day acknowlolrad before me that they executed the foregoing deed as such officers of said corporation, and that they affixed thereto the official seal of said corporation) and I further certify that I know the said persons making said acknowledgments to be the individuals de— scribed in and who executed the said deed. Ili UITIMS IWIMREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal this A) f� '' day of X ' e , 19 c� 7 STATE: - FL0R'fBA u�:: 0OCU.%'=,_ ?_FT4t�0 TA J � � ,: tills%! • lti' 9;005 IDA y { �� ?`i 1✓ TV 4A1 phis is a tie and coat C e� �t 1t rF �' tt the -OFFICIAL �. - tECgS my hand _ ano oEial DWo r j Notary Public NOTARY ►Otl1c.:TAT, of /IORI/� AT NO Mr CO ,v1S; ox C7p1RES Art 17 u vvvnv i..w...wu r,. . N71 r erv.r�.N���t•.,, �� r Mw.... 1. Oarr..l *~ft 0"6 of 609AM9 DOWN". ne.ra MA"IkRCT T. =" Curt A MCNA CW 5CP 00842235 1983NOV 16 PH 2257 W ARRANI'Y OECD .RAMCa FORM 37 irstom `aRnORATraN' COLLIER COUNTY RECORDED This 10arranty ]Deed 4\111de (furl executed file 9 slay D. to 6? l,y IMPERIAL LAKE, INC, a Florida corporation a corpornlio n existing under llte lmas of FLORIDA and having its principal pince of business of Route 2, Box 1704, Naples, Florida 33940 hereinafter caller) tire grantor, to COLLIER COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, a whose postoffice address Is 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 33962, a C hereinafter called the grnutee: G I N'h rnrr nrd herein the term+ ..rann,r" nd "at ntre" inrlu it ail the Parties to this 'mamnent and the brio, Irral rrpreuntati.o and arum. of individuals, and the surcnenn and in of rmpantiom) bitneWth: Thal flat, grantor, for and in consideration of llte stun of S 1.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged. 6y these presents does grant, bargnln, sell, alien, remise, release• convey and ronfirm unto fhe grantee, all flint certain land siluafe In County, Florida, viz: The North 50 feet of: The East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 15, 'township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, subject to and together with all easements for roadways (the above referenced North 50 feet includes an already existing 30 foot road right—of—way easement with reference to O.R. Book 242, Page 251, Public Records, Collier County, Florida). "lopSubject to all asn�, rgtcs, and reservations of record b \. Together tell all wise appertaining. To Vaue at�d t a F Rnd tie prang beg, v simple; Iltal it hasopgk,, rl rants llte title to Sanl'ik lafl� aid that said land t Urea all encumbrances belonging or in any- w4irk, it'W lawfully �seized of said land in feo and only sar%lan►1; Ibot it hereby fully war- inst l ai+,..1aiYTfu1 c tms of all persons whomsoever: cei� l octiitory Stamp Tax ") a bunty, Florida r rxi J. Reon,Clerk" A M te n $$ 1� RI1,,:� "11t I grantor has caused these presents to (CORPORATE SEAL) Y "+:,� • n hr r.Yt c'htJ.c ; it ins Jrarrir, gpdwils corporate sent to be hereunto affixed, by its V, 11 proper of firers Ihrreunlo duly authorized, llte day (still year first above written. ATTEST:....................................................................... IMPERIAL LAF,E, IN . Secretary ..................... �............ ....... ............... .................. .Signed, stale(] 1 delivered in (he pmsertce of: \� NDy'Pau1.......Tl.......n ...:.................... r P + STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER I HEREBY CERTIFY that on thi+ tar, helurr me, an officer duly authorised in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, .. 14 fi.,,.11y ape .... d PAUL E. TOPPINO wrli•knvKn%b meto be the ]'resident and regseairely of the corporation named allNrantnr In, the Torntyirut 'deed, and that they se+.nlly .cknowlydged executing the mine in the presence of two .ulmFibing witnesses freely and vnlunlarily. e+•'.siarlrr •asiihnritr duly voted in them by said corporation and that the seal affixed thereto is the true corporate seal d laid emenratiun. C ' WITNESS Jar hand and oIri,i.1 ..I in the County and State last aforesaid this / day of �(/Ul�E7 %�E�.' . A. D. 19 83 f 7JI& lbsiruferia prrpnrrrf Gy: ✓ p !1W/fJi NDIART PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA n NY C0NNJ551 ONXP, OCT A, 1987 HOW IHRU GENERAL INS. UND. B �• 1 C 0 fT co rn xY�F,�ry '.' jam. J�. ^•, ��, ..( p.:- i k. .;1:.• EG� DOC INT iel= YR. ruce Anew prcpued by: �'EP (0 f H 23 o n; van A;,uerNV.m.doe S Benton. P.A. 0 1 7 3 9 4 3 9 801 eOak Drive, suite 700 COLLIER COUNTY RECORDED Naples, Fl Florida 77%7 (817) 597.21114 DRAINAGE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 27 day of January , 1993, by and between IMPERIAL GOLF CLUB, INC., a Florida Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "IMPERIAL"), and N.A. C �L REALTY TRUST, INC., a Florida Corporation (hereinafter referred to _, as "REALTY TRUST"). cc ao O O rn RECITALS 7X 4+' A. There presently exists a drainage easement recorded in Official Record Book 808, Pages 1897-1898, Official Records of Collier County, Florida, which easement was granted to Collier County, Florida, by the predecessor in interest of both IMPERIAL and REALTY TRUST to provide for drainage easement discharge and storage rights from the real property now owned by REALTY TRUST onto the real property now owned by IMPERIAL; B. Said drainage easement is not now being utilized by o either REALTY TRUST or Collier County, Florida; o o C. Both IMPERIAL and REALTY TRUST desire to relocate said m drainage easement and Collier County, Florida has requested that v• IMPERIAL and REALTY TRUST enter into this Agreement to agree to relocate said easement prior to issuance of certain development approvals by Collier County to REALTY TRUST; NOW, THEREFORE, II4P�Rn�Y TRUST agree as follows: 1. The above "�tcsiare trues inorporated by reference herein as a part 9 t �s Agreement. 2. Subject recorded in Of tic County Public," Re Agreement, IMP RIP easement for pu referenced in th property descrl1 incorporated by,., easement. Said attached hereto 4. TRUST to dischar4 described in Exh: :o 1 e a 51 v , in,„ Ex ri dAt2whidl ference herein,4, inc .sement shall b 'I -in chibit "B" . Sal dV,�s store surface a Maintenazlc� easement shall be °'-thleJ*e'sPP-P-9..? "" successors and assigns* sw , t e "existing easement ag�s 897-1898, Collier oI1,� execution of this � , , r.un%y a new drainage iie I drainage easement a ci !across the real -4s at ached hereto and ud�r) I a sketch of the sqb' stdntially the form (at,/Ahall enable REALTY can the real property reponsibility for said of REALTY TRUST or its 3. Upon execution of this Agreement, REALTY TRUST shall, at its own cost and expense, petition Collier County, Florida to abandon the existing drainage easement and to accept a new drainage easement over and across the real property described in Exhibit "A". IMPERIAL shall join in the petition with REALTY TRUST, at REALTY TRUST'S cost and expense, and execute all documents deemed necessary by Collier County or REALTY TRUST to effectuate this Agreement. REALTY TRUST, its successors and assigns, shall indemnify and hold IMPERIAL harmless and free from any liability, expenses or damages resulting from the easement. Use, maintenance and repair of the easement shall not interfere with normal golf course use and REALTY TRUST shall reimburse IMPERIAL for damages if it does. 4. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between IMPERIAL and REALTY TRUST and may not be modified except in writing signed by both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, IMPERIAL GOLF CLUB, INC. and N.A. REALTY TRUST, INC., have executed this easement as of the day and year first above written. Iy- 1?3 - 00-5- CC, 9/7/43 ;� �,', �•'* toasy11,��" u��"� �,apf*L.4� pit p Witnesses: Signature Nurse Printed i "",/" l " Signature Nurse Printed Wi se si .�oNnature 04 N hg �� a Printed n ure Nurse Printed STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE ME, an offi last aforesaid to tale" day personally appe#"c as President of WEIR� me well known and/'knhi the for,,6goi'iid me that he/she bxee expressed. WITNESS MY napal'an- STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 1864 000448 OR BOOK PAGEy IMPERIAL GOLFS,'SUB, INC. a Florida C p ra do By: Prins N.me. FRANK J. BRINKMAN Its: PRESIDENT (CORPORATE SEAL) N.A. REAETY TRUST, INC. a Flo d Co pora�,injl By: Print Name: Aub a Fe a0 Its• President FRANK J. GOLF CLUB, INC., o me_ to be the p -.cl (instrument f ojfi�i4 dki pa, i1 Notary 'ub1F Print Name°,,.,> (CORPORATE SEAL) in the state and County administer oaths, this 3brida Corporation, Lo on described in and who Fwlelged to and before ,r,the, purposes therein OR FLORIDA. M March J , 1"S. .IC UNDUBMUTER& of BEFORE ME, an officer duly authorized in the state and County last aforesaid to take acknowledgments and administer oaths, this day personally appeared AL)&egq FEgago I as President of N.A. REALTY TRUST, INC. a Florida Corporation, to me well known and known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to and before me that he/she executed said instrument for the purposes therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and official se is day of , 1993. Notary u is Print Name Commission Number 20881M NOTARY PL'&LIc St*t6 of IFLONIDA _ NY COMISSI011 T.RF. 11AX. 5,1994 WINDED TNP.0 (2112RAL JN,^. CND. -2- V i N x O .4 43 a Q 0 1864 000449 JR BOOK PAGE NWTH LINE SE 1/4 SEC 15-45-25 HMA FILE NO. 68.46 FEBRUARY 15, 1990 DRAINAGE EASEMENT v 15' D.E. A strip of land 15 foot wide located In the Southeast Quarter of a Section 15. Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, a Florida being further described as follows Commence at the Northeast comer of the Southeast Quartero Section 15, Township 48 South, Collier County, Florida; thence n North 89' 17' 40" W ILO 00 1 i P.O.B. ' / I W u7 O - N89' 1 T0 W 4260.84 - W b to O NE COR SE 1/4 SEC 15-48-25 W O I Z Z cn ' � J cn Q pt, along the North line of the Southebs�arter of the said Section 15 for a distance of 260.84 feet to 0q T OF BEGINNING of the parcel of land herein described; thence u{i South 35' 42' 20" West for a distance ad 115.25 feet; t�ieaFj jrun �� m North 54' 17' 40" West for a distance of 15.DO feet; thience ir�1n North 35' € 42' 20" East for a distance of 104.75 feet to a point the North line of the Southeast Quarter of the sold Section n,£, ence p, run South 89' 17' 40' East along the North line fo the t�ast Quarter of the said Section 15 for a distance of 18.31 f�ei� the POINT OF BEGINNING 1 i Containing 0.0379 Acres, more or less. e `: �` `s i Bearings shown hereon refer to on assumed bearing of N89 1'7 Yit 9 along the North line of the SE 1/4 Section 15, Township 48 South Range 25 East SIGNED. ' zz 9cF ` .. HOLE MONTES & ASSOCIATES, INC. BY: � ', �/ G -- P.I-S. 3741 Thomas J. Garris State of no. • NOT A SURVEY • '� HOLE, MONTES & ASSOCIATES •P, ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS NAPLES - FORT MYERS - BONITA SPRINGS 80 0 80 160 SCALE IN FEET SKETCH OF A LEGAL DESCRIPTION 88.46 DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 SEC. 15, TMP 48 S. RGE 25 E SSE uE f vwmm ` a164'1T 4Cw �' <� gT4Y 7?E2_'' iTP 1T 40'E °;tOl7S *02'29" E 50' �25' r I' I 00'00" E HMA FILE NO. 88.46 FEBRUARY 15. 1990 DRAINAGE EASEMENT E 1/4 COR. SEC. 15-48-25 N8917'40'W 788.43 SOUTH LINE NE 1/4 SEC. 15-48-25 N89'17'40'W N89'17'40'W 788.43 A strip of land 50 foot wide located in Section 15. Township 4 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida being further described as follows: The South 25 feet of the East 788.43 feet of the Northeast ic of Section 15. Township 48 South, Range 25 East. Collier Coon Florida; and the North 25 feet of the East 788.43 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 15. Township 48 South. Range 4: Collier County, Florida. Containing 0.905 Acres, more or less Bearings shown hereon refer to an assumed bearing of N89'17' along the South line of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 15 Twp 48 S, Rge SIGNED: G' Z HOLE, MONIES k ASSOCIATES. INC. BY: P.L.S. 3741 Thomas J. Garris t State of Flo. * NOT A SURVEY * m or. nm 4u 2 HOLE, MONTES do ASSOCIATES I'm 6Y. DATE �D. 2 00 �� ENGINEERS — PLANNERS — SURVEYORS 117, D Err: DAZE NAPLES — FORT MYERS — SONITA SPRINGS 25' L0 N I 00 1 Lo U Uj In w� z o -� o � O Q 80 0 80 160 SCALE IN FEET SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED IN THE E 1/2 OF SEC 15. TWP 48 S. RGE 25 E O cn m x x H q B-1295 ro PRO&= NO. q G� 88.46 N RUEF"CE NO. o ee{ewr .� N - �� d` 7 Thin laalrument prepared by: R. Brae Anderson, Esq. Young, ran Auenderp, Vamadoe d Benton, P.A. 801 IAurel Oat Drive, Suite 700 Naples, Florida 77967 (817) 597_7814 1864 OR BOOK EXHIBIT "B" 000451 PAGE GRANT OF REVISED DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made and entered into this 27 day of January , 1993, by and between IMPERIAL GOLF CLUB, INC., a Florida corporation, as Grantor, and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, its successors, assigns and licensees, as Grantee: WITNESSETH: That the Grantor for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, by these presents does hereby grant to the Grantee, its successors, assigns and licensees, a perpetual, nonexclusive easement for drainage purposes, over, under, upon and across the following lands, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, described in the attached Exhibit "Art which is incorporated by reference herein.,r x.. Subject to easemeptstl cs f reservations of record. To have and t3iold the same -,,unt said Grantee, its successors, assi ns;,°And licensees, toghewith the right to enter upon said lands`"ti C"onstruct and maint`gin rainage facilities thereof, together *ith^� impro improvements, rates, fills, cuts, drains, ditches anc other i►cidettals vwhich Grantee, its successors, asst�igns,,in&44C"o o e wCes ary or convenient in connection tthewthnc nit' no»� '�th,this instrument. By accept.ncs"fig xof hsnsrument, Grantee abandons, relinq�iishes and waives 4,ta11 n eVgt' in that certain drainage easem�� ecorded at 0 R" .k"JoC B BB Pages 1897-1898, Official Recorder ,Collier County -al loiic'a� in acknowledgement that the easement", rented by this j�nl% 'umeFlt is to replace the prior recorded dr 2,h (6.easement. This dedication,' -ands? - 0 e of the same shall not place any duty, burden or 11i Al u pn Collier County, by formal act of the governing body,o_aacQept the of herein and hereby dedicated, not obligate Collier County to improve the aforesaid property in any manner, nor shall acceptance of this dedication by Collier County obligate Collier County to improve the aforesaid property in any manner. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the be executed in its name and hereto by its proper officer year first above written. witnesses: AZ,c.J4f-:e•p �• ��'-eta signature Name Printed Si�nature t: r Name Printed 1% - q,3 -0 11 Grantor has caused these presents to its corporation seal to be affixed thereunto duly authorized the day and IMPERIAL GOLF B, INC. a Florida C p ratio By Print Name: FRANK J. BRINKMAN Its: PRESIDENT _ (CORPORATE SEAL) JFirtjk Q4 - �'°p.� w I ATTEST: Dy �AW ,,SROCS, CLBRR ,y _f ',�Approved,ap"to form and legal • stif tiency Assistant Co'tty Attorney STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 1864 OR BOOK 000452 PAGEi BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, F,1.9RIDA - BORT L. SAUNDERS, y�IjIMAN Its• Chairman /�/ BEFORE ME, an officer duly authorized in the state and County last aforesaid to take acknowledgments and administer oaths, this day personally appeared FRANK J. BRINKMAN as President of IMPERIAL GOLF CLUB, INC., a Florida Corporation, to me well known and known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to and before me that he/she executed said instrument for the purposes therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and official seal this Z day of Jftn ce ��Zv , 1993. N STATE OF FLORI COUNTY OF COLT WA ANNE SANZAR Print Name' ~ C 088158 S` x=\ ' an officer duly I HEREBY d FY,- iat this ay, iiefbrO' ►i°, Y authorized in tTe State and 4�gount�y �resaid to take acknowledgments;j`p tsonally appeared'�'URTIL [NA!'RS well known to me to be they ft- Arman of the Bo�I�d bf ,ty commissioners, Collier County, F is , As The Governing' ody of Collier County and as Ex-Officio e� c ,rnin Board o tie,, ollier County Water- g Sewer District, bean utkorized sO �"g , executed the foregoing Grant of Revised DrainAc�t-E se,m mar abandonment of Existing Drainage Easement for thereTT:aes`" therein contained under authority duly invested by the Board of County Commissioners, and that the seal affixed thereto is the true seal of said Board. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this day of , 1993. Notary ublic )a - Printed Name Commission Number My Commission expires: Y SEAL 2088IM FF ItOLYN OS'Uf E IC FILSON OF FL rJDA NOT PU4LIC STAfFCC��44 COMMISSION NO. htY S--- EXP. AUG. 6,1996 CUraN' IR64 000453 OR BOOK RM PAGE 1 OF 3 EXHIBIT "A" DRAINAGE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION The North 25 feet of the East 788.43 feet of Southeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida and A strip of land 15 foot wide located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida being further described as follows: Commence at the Northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida; thence run North 89'17'40" West, along the North line of the Southeast Quarter of the said Section 15 for a distance of 260.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel of land herein described; thence run South 35'42'20" West for a distance of 115.25 feet; thence run thence run North 35*42'2� North line of the So,th 89*17140" East alon 15 for a distance o, Containing 0.4904 A Bearings shown here line of the SE 1/4 - " %stfor a distance Quarter of the said North line o to Souea 1 tie to` the kPQ N� O ' E $y' .'er to an assumed be ring Ze, r"5, Township 48 SoAilk t a distance of 15.00 feet; '�,75 feet to a point on the t�ctioti 15; thence run South Otart�r of the said Section 4011W along the North East. E 1/4 COR. SEC. 15-48-25 ?'29" E F25' (- 50' _ N89'17'40"W 788.4.3 -�' SOUTH LINE NE 1/4 SEC. 15-48-25 N8917'40'W —� NB917'40'W 788.43 YOO" E HMA FILE NO. 88.46 FEBRUARY 15. 1990 DRAINAGE EASEMENT locatedA strip of land 50 foot wide In Section 15�- South. Range 25 EwL CollierCoun IP Florid being further described as follows: The South 25 feet of the East 788.43 feet of the Northeast Du of Section 15. Township 48 South. Range 25 East. Collier Counts Florida; and the North 25 feet of the East 788.43 feet of the Southeast Oundnr of Suction 15. Township 48 s-,th -Remga 25 Collier County. Florldo. Containing 0.905 Acres. more or lass Bearings shown hereon refer to an assumed bearing of N89'17'4 along the South line of the HE 1/4 of Sec. 15 Twp 48 S. Rge SIGNED: * FZ HOLE. MONTES & ASSOCUITM INC. P.L.S. 3741 Thomas .L Gorris State of Fla • NOT A SURVEY • L HOLE. MONTES do ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS —PLANNERS —SURVEYORS NAPLES — FORT MYERS — BONRA SPRINGS 25' 1 25' LO N 1 Go i U W rn W1 Z O J O I-- o Na b KTZ 80 0 80 160 SCALE IN FEET SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED IN THE E 1/2 OF SEC 15. TWP 48 S. RGE 25 E B-1295 88.46 W46ea.. C: � O ao O M 51 a E4 FA on F-4 X ril 1�64 000455 lik BOOK PAGE] NORTH UNE SE 1/4 SEC 15-48-25 PROPOSED 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT A strip of land 15 foot wide located in the Southeast Ouarter" Section 15. Township 48 South, Range 25 East, CollierCounty. Florido being further described as follows: Commence at the Northeast corner of the S0pjhea_st , arter Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East,-!,C��O�k�'1 r County. Florida; thence run North 89'17'40- West, c�o -t_hpe North line the Southeast Quarter of the said Sectlarl,'1r3ar O distance c 278.35 feet; thence run South 00'42'20 _* tt or a distance" 25.00 feet to the P&INT OF BEGINNING Ofr ,parcel at 4a71d 1 described: thence run South 35'42'20 1VGst for a distance of feet; thence run South 45'31'36' West for 4 Idistance of r53.4 thence run North 44'2824" West for agdistorlce of 1500 feet thence run North 45*31'36- East fora 41i t a of 5215#feet; run North 35'42'20- East for a distance r 71,3.59 feet to o"dp 25.00 feet South of, as measured at ri es to, )Ke Not Of the Southeast Ouarter of the said Sectn 15; then e r" South 89'17'40 East parallel with the Narth of the S, utt Ouorter of the said Section 15 for a drs� t§18.3 ft t POINT OF BEGINNING, Containing 0.0455 Aaregre +pr ss, Bearings shown hereon refer to on assumed bepru of_N,.89, along the North line of the Southeast Quarter oT Section TSr. Township 48 South, Range 25 East. N IMPERIAL LAKES ao , W _ O N89-1 40 W 278.35 0 7DD.E. L1 O P.O.B. NE COR SE 1/4 SEC 15-48-25 W O Z CO J Z LLtn Q W UNE ', DfRi;Q ON DISTANCE W 7`. 25.00 85.M 3 'W � 5 t)4,5�f7��'E 52.1D5 6 ft `4 40 E ?O 73.59 11131 18 31 7 �`t k; SCALE SIGNED: 08/20/92 ZZTES AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BY: P.L.S. #4175 Stephen Seidler State of no. * NOT A SURVEY HOLE, MONTES & ASSOCIATES SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION �PROPOSED 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS ENGINEERS - BONRA SPRINGS LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 SEC- 15, TWP 48 S. RGE 25 E � NAPLES -FORT MYERS a 1864 000456 JR BOOK PAGE1 This Instrument prepared by: R. Bruce Anderson, Esq. Young, van Assenderp, Va rnadoe 6 Benton, P.A. a01 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 33963 (813) 597-2814 GRANT OF REVISED DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT 'H S ND NTURE, made and entered into this -.- day of 1993, by and between N.A. REALTY INC., a Florida corporation, as Grantor, and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, its successors, assigns and licensees, as Grantee: WITNESSETH: That the Grantor for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($l.00) and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, by these presents does hereby grant to the Grantee, its successors, assigns and licensees, a perpetualand nonexclusive easement for drainage purposes, over, under, up across the following lands, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, described in the attached Exhibit All which is incorporated by reference herein. Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record. To have and successors, assigns enter upon said lands thereof, together 5 drains, ditches / successors, assigns in connection t"rei By accept abandons, reli drainage easen Official Recor that the easen prior recorded to hold the__ same other inciden licensees, may( aft-C not in con :a 3 ®0L1 mid. pia s ala: rec t E �i�r `CCu1Fit( � t isx in easement. unto said Grantee, its ,gether with the right to `1gtain drainage facilities ' grades, fills, cuts, a,is)p;aPhich Grantee, its �e�tne ssary or convenient lic w ih this instrument. this instrument, Grantee est` in that certain o`,808, 'Pages 1897-1898, Lbr�daj J-4 acknowledgement t nimerLF- s to replace the This dedic i and the recor*ion )o 'VJie same shallno place any duty, bit e or liability ubdn','S6i County, by formal act of the governs body, to accept the.,,,, he 33�o)$erty herein and hereby dedicated, not obli }a� slier Conyt� "improve the aforesaid property in any manned, rl Sla Ccece of this dedication by Collier County obligatedl >e,, to improve the aforesaid .. property in any manner. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name and its corporation seal to be affixed hereto by its proper officer thereunto duly authorized the day and year first above written. N.A. TY TRUST, C. Wi se a F1 r' a Cow, t n r�i 3 � _ Signature By. M J C►M.1 HAMGS �.j Print Name: UBRE FERRAO S Name Printed V � • Its: President ignature Z Q (CORPORATE SEAL) X m Name Printed 0 V. 7 ,r Or ,k. ATT ps�S .(�Icock, Cleck ;-49 �!%&bved. ap,.to form and q���] " tciency Assistant Cou y Attorney STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 1864 OR BOOK 000457 PROM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER OUNT FL O IDA By: BURT L. SAUNDERS Its• Chairman BEFORE ME, an officer duly authorized in the state and County last aforesaid to take acknowledgments and administer oaths, this day personally appeared AUBREY FERRAO, as President of N.A. REALTY TRUST, INC., a Florida Corporation, to me well known and known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to and before me that he executed said instrument for the purposes therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and official seal this 3day of 1993. Ncatax Public jZ Commissioir'�Ner OTARY ►UBM STATE OF ►LORmA AT LARW M . COMMOSION EXPIRES AUGUST M.1994 ,f 80 ED THRU AGENT'S NOTARY BROKERAGR s STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER . I HEREBY CERL'X z�L nL u11g t-110', z I authorized irk ' rekerid: Co' acknowledgment6`s i s r al appe "rd BI to me to be tla airman of the Bo Collier County,:�'�'Jida, As The Gov4a and as Ex -Of f iciq the, Governing Board Sewer District, b'A6ng°\,authorized so to Grant of Revised e Easement a, Drainage Easement ob �Purpps�:s authority duly investdd by ]Ae PQ 9 that the seal affixed tharm is a �t 6r met, an officer duly aforesaid to take SANDERS, well known "..= Commissioners, OdA Cy $'cads?,. of Collier County e co llier County Water- - cuted the foregoing donment of Existing e'rein contained under unty Commissioners, and seal of said Board. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this _2111- day of 1993. Notary Pu is C-0111n't�eNa�me� Commission Number My Commission expires: 208 81M 9I;1� Qa(jN �I(1'fi AV 0 3KXSTARE (OF 1 - ��/COA�ON NO. OC= lk �864 000458 OR BOOK MO PAGE 1 OF 2 EXHIBIT "A" DRAINAGE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South 25 feet of the East 788.43 feet of the Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Containing 0.4525 Acres, more or less. { E 1/4 COR. SEC. 15-48-25 3'02'29" E , 50 0' �25 N8997'40*W 788.43 SOUTH LINE NE 1/4 SEC. 15-48-25 �—�E — — — — — — — — N89'17'40'W ,0 N89'17'40"W 788.43 O'00'00" E HMA FILE NO. 88.46 FEBRUARY 15. 1990 DRAINAGE EASEMENT A strip of land 50 t wideSouth. Range 25 East.Collie, County. Flor1 Floridaod being further described as follows The South 25 feet of the East 788.43 feet of the NortheasO Fof lorida;Section 15. nd the NorthIP48 South. 25 feet of thRange tEast 71B&43 feet of(1 Southeast Ouader ofSection,M TmenshlP 48 South._Raogs. Collier County, Florida Containing 0.905 Acres. more or less Bearings shown hereon refer to an assumed bearing of N89 along the South line of to NE 1/4 of Sea 15 TwP 48 S. F SIGNED: * HOLE. MONTES do ASSOCIATES. INC. P.L.S. 3741 BY: T ` ' Thomas J. Game State of Fla 0, e. ' -> ;c o - x j F7 s >, 3 3 -'"` ro .-.,:i,�✓ - ns�xr 3 gip' g. _, -. v 25' 1 25' to N I 00 I U W nn LaZ Q J o � o 80 0 80 160 SCALE IN FEET to x x H m ;X' OCO O C" ;K 4w- -0 O 1 c,n co SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION 88.46 HOLE, IrfONTES do ASSOCIATES dN a DRAINAGE EASEMENT 0 A� ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS LOCATED IN THE E 1/2 OF SEC 15. TWP 48 S. RGE 25 E ee+e.a. MAPLES - FORT MYERS - BONITA SPRINGS * NOT A SURVEY * B-1295 V! • 1 r - F r' - 61991 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 3301 E. TAMIAMI TR. GROWTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FL 33962 (813)774-8282 A CERTIFIED BLUE CHIP COMMUNITY February 4, 1991 Mr. R. Bruce Anderson, Agent Young, Van Assenderp, Varnadoe and Benton, P. A. 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 33963 Re: EXM-031--NN (second response) for Property Described as the E 1/2 of NE 1/4 of Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East,.STRAP #482515-010.000; Owner: N. A. Realty Trust, Inc.. ZONING: PUD - Imperial Lakes (residential) Dear Bruce: Please be advised the following determination has been made by the Growth Planning Department regarding the above -referenced Exemption application. Though the subject property is deemed inconsistent and unimproved, it is exempted from the Zoning Reevaluation Program contained in the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance 90--23, pursuant to the Exemption granted below: Determination Exemption Requested * approved Development Dedications, Contributions and Conveyances (Sec. 2.4.6) Limitations I. A determination which grants anyexemption shall exempt development only to the extent expressly contained in such exemption provision. 2. An exemption applies to the land and is therefore transferable from owner to owner of the land subject to the exemption. See enclosed memorandum from Bob Blanchard dated January-28, 1991. Mr. Anderson February 4, 1991 Page 2 3.. Anything in the Zoning Reevaluation ordinance to the contrary notwithstanding, an exemption may be revoked upon a showing by the County of a peril to public health, safety or general welfare of the residents of Collier County unknown at the time. of approval. it is important that a copy of this Exemption approval letter accompany all development order (e.g. Final Site Development Plan, building permit, sign permit, etc.) applications to assist in avoiding any delay in processing and reviewing of that development order application(s). Should you have any questions regarding the contents of this letter, or the Zoning Reevaluation ordinance in general, please call me at 774--8282. PREPARED BY P-4,"-j " "�~ David Weeks Senior Planner REVIEWED BY Growth Planning Director cc: EXM/File DW/2.491/BA MEMORANDUM TO: David Weeks, Se�or Planner Y'eFROM: Bob Blanchardi Growth Planning Director DATE: January 28, 1991 SUBJECT: EXM-031-NN, Imperial Lakes PUD, R. Bruce Anderson Agent, Request For Exemption 2.4.6 f BACKGROUND Section.2.4.6 of the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance (Ordinance 90-23) permits the following exemption to the application of the Ordinance: 2.4..6 Development Dedications, Contributions and Conveyances. The provisions of this Ordinance shall not affect the validity of any lawfully issued and effective development order (including a development order that acquired its density or intensity of use through the transfer of development rights) which was approved or issued subject to a condition that required a dedication, contribution or conveyance of a substantial interest in real or personal property to any governmental agency if: 2.4.6.1 The dedication, contribution or conveyance on which the development order was conditioned has been lawfully granted, accepted by the applicable governmental agency and recorded, if appropriate, in the public records of Collier County, Florida; and 2.4.6.2 The dedication, contribution or conveyance on which the development order was conditioned benefits the public; and 2.4.6.3 The dedication, contribution or conveyance on which the development order was conditioned is in excess of those required under the Collier County Subdivision Regulations (Ordinance No. 76-6), as amended, the Collier County Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No.,82-2.), as amended, and the Collier County Growth Management Plan, as amended, and clearly benefits the public or property other than the subject property. This exemption is subject to the same limitations outlined in Section 2.4.7 as all other exemptions provided for in the Ordinance. The applicant has submitted for. an exemption to the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance for the.Imperial Lakes PUD based on the dedication of fifty (50) feet of right of way along the north property line to accommodate a portion of Livingston Road. ANALYSIS The applicant has furnished all of the information required by the exemption application. This analysis and any conclusion based thereon is conditioned upon the accuracy and validity of the facts, evidence or information as presented by the applicant. It is clear that the referenced dedications represent a substantial interest of real or personal property. The property owner at the time of development order approval and the time of the dedication was the sole owner of the property including the property subject to the dedication. Ordinance 82-81 is the development order that approves what is known as Imperial Lakes PUD. The development order requires the developer to reserve fifty feet of right of way along the north property boundary to accommodate an east/west arterial road (the planned Livingston Road). The development order provides that the developer could be released from this reservation if the planned arterial is ever deleted from the comprehensive plan. However, the applicant dedicated the property subject to the reservation to Collier County in the form of a Warranty Deed which was recorded in the public records of the County. The dedication will benefit the public as Livingston Road is actually constructed. The ultimate construction of this corridor will provide an alternative corridors for travel in this area of the County. The Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance requires that the dedication,. conveyance and contributions that are the subject of the exemption application be in excess of the County's Subdivision Regulations (Ordinance 76-6), Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance 82-2) and the Collier County Growth Management Plana these references make it clear that the comparison is to the regulations currently in effect, not those regulations in effect at the time of development order approval. The dedication of this right of way is beyond the requirements outlined in these three regulations. FINDINGS Based on the material provided by the applicant and the above analyses, I have made the following findings: 1. The property owner at the time of the dedication of the right of way for a portion of the Livingston Road Corridor had a substantial interest in the property which included the right of way. The property owner was the sole owner of the property. 2. The reservation of fifty feet of right of way was a condition of the development order (Ordinance 82W81) approving the Imperial Lakes PUD. 3. The dedication of the right of way was accepted by Collier County and recorded in the Public Records of Collier County. 4. The provision of right of way is in excess of the requirements of the Subdivision Regulauions, Zoning Ordinance and ti he Growth Management Plan. CONCLUSION This application meets the criteria for an exemption to the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance under Section 2.4.6 of that Ordinance and is approved. El r r E8 I I mi RESOLUTION 97- 72 A RESOLUT10N BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.7.3.4 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AFFECTING ORDINANCE 82-81 KNOWN AS IMPERIAL LAKES PUD, EXTENDING THE CURRENT PUD APPROVAL TO FEBRUARY 11, 2002; AND PROVIpING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Imperial Lakes PUD, Ordinance 02-81 adopters on September 14, 1982, may be subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.1., of the Land Development Cade (LDC), Time Limite for Approved PUD Zoning Districts together with their respective Master Pl.a,nni and WHEREAS, the PUD was adopted consistent with and under the provisions of the Colliers County Grewth Management Plan and has a valid and effective Final Site Development Plan approval, which approval prohibited the issuance of building permits for the PUD until Livingston Road was constructed by the County, and said road has not yet been constructed; and WHEREAS, the density of the PUD has previously been determined, to be vested; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has reviewed the PUD and has determined to extend the current PUD Zoning for five years, until February 11, 2002. NOW, 'THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of County commissioners of Collier County, Florida that: 1. The above recitals are adopted herein by reference as if fully set forth herein. 2. This Resolution shall constitute evidence of the County's compliance with the review requirements of Section 2.7.3.4 of the LDC. 3. Pursuant. to said section of the LDC, the current PUD approval is hereby extended to February 11, 2002; at the end of which time it may be determined whether the PUD property owner is required to submit to the procedures its LDC Section 2.7.3.4. 4. Prior to construction under the authority of approved Final. Site Development Plan (VSDP) No. 89-134, Said FSDP 9ha11 be reviewed for compliance with the r_DC requirements in of fact on the date of this Resolution and shall be amended to be brought into compliance to the extent that said requirements do not invalidate or require changes or amendments to the permits of other agencies and do not cause the placement of buildings and infrastructure shown an the FSDP to be changed or the buildable area to be reduced. FEB 1 1 S7 This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its approval. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board and in the records of the Petition For which the extension is granted. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this _Z day of February, 1997. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ,,;,...., TIMOTHY HANCOCK, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E: ; BRQGK, CLERK i. �1 ROV-D AB.,TQVFORM'AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: MARJ IE M. STUDENT ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY 50•rba\r*to1ution V, COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 0 WATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING D November 22, 1988 N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. 6101 Pelican Bay Blvd. Naples, FL 33963 RE: Excavation Permit No. 59.148 "Imperial Lakes" Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East Collier County, Florida Dear Gentlemen: Collier County records show that the property located east of Old US 41 (see attached map) and more particularly described as: The East 1/2 of the NE la of Section 15, T 48 S, R 25 E, subject to easements, was purchased to you in July 1988. The Board of County Commissioners had issued an excavation permit on this property several years ago. However, due to the lapse in activity on the excavation, the permit is considered to be void. During an inspection of the site on October 18, 1988, it was discovered that work was being done to clear the area and prepare it for excavation. The operator indicated that "West Coast" had purchased the property. I would greatly appreciate any information you could provide as to the proposed intentions to do work on this site. If you are not directly involved or have subsequently sold this property, please provide any information you can as to who can be contacted to discuss this project. Thank you for your help in this matter. Please contact rme'or Stephanie R. Smith of this office at 813--774-8277, as soon as possible. Sincerely, 1 & .,' John H. Boldt, P.E. Water Management Director JHB/S RS/als Enc. 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FLORIDA 33962-4977 813-774-8999 WATER W1ANAGEMENT PLAN Figure � VIUINiTY MAP d o e z 2000 0 2000 4000 z '~ �1 t scale i"= 20C?0 ' ` ,eef' SECrTjo:j COR.11ER , e d `° •?. EAST BOUNDARY. co cv SEC7. 6. T1`i P.46S.R G E.25E s - a- 'SITE .PLAN `9-2B6 1000 0 - 1000 scale V=1000 feet 77— �. p rt• ,. p. Development Services Department F rah Community Development Division 1 Collier County Government ;k. = ;= 2800 North Horseshoe Drive 1 Naples, FL 33942.6917 Phone; 813 1 643.8400 D f`^ r PROJECT REVIEW SERVICES may. July 24, 1990 Mr. Jeff Nunner Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc. 715 Tenth Street South Naples, Florida 33939 r f� JU t4 u� RE: Development Excavation Permit No. 59.148 "Imperial Lakes" Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East Collier County, Florida Dear Jeff: In accordance with the authority given in Section 6.B of County Ordinance No. 88-26, your application for a "Development" Excavation is hereby approved subject to the following stipulations: 1. The excavation shall be limited to a bottom elevation of -3.0 ft. ngvd. All disturbed areas proposed for lake excavation shall be excavated to a minimum elevation of 1.5 ft. ngvd. 2. No excavated material shall, be removed from the project site. Since we are in receipt of the excavation performance guarantee in the amount of $10,000.00 and the permit fee in the amount of $154.00 this letter is your authorization to proceed with the excavation project in accordance with your plans and the above -mentioned stipulations. Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact us at (813).:643-8471. cerely Gre Robertson Sent gineer GHR/ gs cc: Clyde Fugate, Engineering Inspection Supervisor Margaret Kincaid; SFWMD Field Engineer (Naples) July 11, 1990 N A REALTY TRUST A = N C 1� 6401 PELICAN BAY BLVD. MAPLES, FLORIDA 33963 e"i c� 1 VIA HAND DELIVERY Mr. Gregory H. Robertson Senior Engineer Collier County Development Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, F1 33942 RE: DEVELOPMENT EXCAVATION NO, 59.148 "IMPERIAL LAKES" Section 1S, Township 48 South, Range 25 East Collier County, Florida Dear Greg: Enclosed for your use and review .is an irrevocable standby Letter of credit issued by Barnett Bank of Naples for the above referenced project and excavation permit. Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to ca 11 . Your,s �u , John Hayes / — Development( Manager JH/hg Enclosure CC'. Jeff Nunner, Hole Montes k IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 513 ISSUER: Barnett Bank of Naples, 796 Fifth Ave. S. Naples, F133940 (hereinafter "Issuer") PLACE AND DATE OF ISSUE: 796 fifth Ave.. S., Naples, FL 33940 June 5, 1990 PLACE OF EXPIRY: At Issuer's Counters DATE OF EXPIRY: This Credit shall be valid until June 5, 1991 and shall thereafter be automatically renewed for successive one-year periods on the anniversary of its issue unless at least sixty (60) days prior to any such anniversary date, th.e Issuer notifies the Beneficiary in writing by registered mail that the Issuer elects riot to renew this Credit. APPLICANT: N.A. Realty 'Trust 6401 Pelican Bay Blvd. Naliles, FL 3396340 (hereinafter "Applicant") BENEFICIARY: The Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida (Hereinafter "Beneficiary") Collier County Courthouse Complex Naples, Florida 33962, Attn: Project Review Services AMOUNT: $10,000.00 (U.S.) up town aggregate thereof. CREDIT AVAILABLE WITH: Issuer BY: Payment against documents detailed herein and Beneficiary's drafts at sight drawn on the Issuer. DOCUMENTS REQUIRED: AVAILABLE BY BENEFICIARY`S DRAFT(S) AT SIGHT DRAWN ON THE ISSUER AND ACCOMPANIED BY BENEFICIARY'S STATEMENT PURPORTEDLY SIGNED BY THE COUNTY MANAGER, CERTIFYING THAT: "N.A. Realty Trust" has failed to meet or complete the requirements of the Excavation Permit #59.148, Site Development Plan #89-184 for the project named Imperial Lakes or a final inspection satisfactory to Collier County, pursuant to Colli.erCounty Ordinance No. 88-26, has not been performed prior to the date of expiry and satisfactory alternative performance security has not been provided to and formally accepted by the "Beneficiary". DRAFT(S) DRAWN UNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT MUST BE MARKED: "Drawn under Barnett Bank of Naples, Credit No. 513 dated June 5, 1990. The original letter of credit and all amendments, if any, must be presented for proper endorsement. Letter of Credit No. 513 N.A. Realty Trust Page 2 This Letter of Credit sets forth in full the terms of the Issuer's undertaking and such undertaking shall not in any way be modified, amended or amplified by reference to any documents, instrument, or agreement referenced to herein or in which this letter of credit relates, and any such reference shall not be deemed to incorporate herein by reference any document, instrument or agreement. Issuer hereby engages with Beneficiary that draft(s) drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this credit will be duly honored by Issuer if presented within the validity of this credit. This credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (1983 Revision) International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 400. BARNETT BANK OF NAPLES .1 BY Ldc t..t _ !/ Sri Christ pher C Houtchens Senior Vice President Senior Loan Officer `a w al Y i a•y - w � , Y �1. r r j It 1 _ • !�i!' ^� a 4 � ■mow � � +!+ ' �. r ' •r� - 1 r. +. g�ayypp �'., pr i � � � . rri ■ 'r arc #' .•s�Ew�vgrrr Ap ■ ti rt r.�ri= ■ •• +. IF v.r:'64. nil: tauR wl•�r Afar �� w"Parwooma ' ■ _'r" r l u ' ■ -,arch �. jo Ila i' } 'a. r•'i.•'-r..• .,rls� •i�• lap + ,• +•l�s_'� ■ j i nt pp Epold to _ a .rY , ' •. RRr 'l+sj�,; -+'M �Iiti4r ;ci -r `L Af 9w, UPC r�, I 1 1,400 700 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLEMENT IMPERIAL LAKES JULY 2025 Prepared by: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. Marine & Environmental Consulting PHONE:239-643-0166 WWW.THANAPLES.COM Table of Contents 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................................1 2 Existing Conditions (Pre-Development).......................................................................................................3 2.1 FLUCFCS Codes and Habitat Descriptions...........................................................................................3 2.2 Vegetative Associations............................................................................................................................4 2.3 Topography and Drainage Patterns.......................................................................................................6 2.4 Wetlands & Other Surface Waters..........................................................................................................7 2.4.1 Wetland Seasonal High -Water Table & Hydroperiod.....................................................................7 2.4.2 Jurisdictional Status of Wetlands and Other Surface Waters.........................................................7 2.5 Native Habitat...........................................................................................................................................8 2.6 Listed Plant and Animal Species.............................................................................................................9 2.7 Historical and Archaeological Resources............................................................................................10 2.8 Soils...........................................................................................................................................................10 3 Proposed Conditions (Post Development).................................................................................................19 3.1 Proposed Project......................................................................................................................................19 3.2 Project Impacts to Wetlands..................................................................................................................20 3.2.1 Direct, Permanent Impacts................................................................................................................20 3.2.2 Temporary Impacts............................................................................................................................20 3.2.3 Secondary Impacts to Wetlands and Water Resources..................................................................20 3.2.4 Cumulative Impacts to Wetlands.....................................................................................................21 3.3 Preservation of Wetlands, Other Surface Waters, and Uplands.......................................................21 3.4 Project Impact to Listed Species............................................................................................................22 3.5 Project Impacts to Archaeological/Historical Resources..................................................................26 4 Avoidance and Minimization of Wetland Impacts..................................................................................27 5 Project Consistency with CCME..................................................................................................................28 AppendixA: Exhibits................................................................................................................................................1 Appendix B: Listed Species Survey........................................................................................................................2 Appendix C: Initial Coordination with Division of Historical Resources .....................................................3 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 1 INTRODUCTION The Imperial Lakes PUD is approximately 78.28 acres in size and contains the 76.81-acre project site and approximately 1.47 acres of road right-of-way set aside for the Veterans Memorial Blvd Extension in northern Collier County, east of Old U.S. 41 and west of Livingston Road, just south of the Lee/ Collier County line. The property is located within Sections 14 and 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, in Collier County, Florida. The project site is identified as folio number 00153160004 by the Collier County property appraiser's office. Access to the project is via Veterans Memorial Extension from Livingston Road to the northern property line. A general location map is provided in the included exhibits. The proposed project lands have been used in the past as a fill borrow pit (Collier County Excavation Permit # 59.148), and it was permitted through the SFWMD permit for a residential development in 1990 (Permit #11-00684-S), though the property is currently undeveloped/vegetated land. There are residential developments and golf courses in the vicinity to the east and south. There are also commercial and industrial uses within 1,000 feet to the west and northwest of the property. The property directly adjacent to the east is a new high school. Properties immediately west and northwest of the site are part of the Collier County Railhead Preserve which was purchased and protected as part of the Conservation Collier Program. The overall project boundary is limited to the approximately 76.81-acre Imperial Lakes property. The site consists primarily of undeveloped, forested land surrounding two man-made fill pit ponds from when the site was mined for fill. These ponds will be partially preserved and incorporated into the development's surface water management program and there will be no loss of surface waters as a result of the project. A majority of the site has been infested to varying degrees by exotic vegetation including melaleuca and Brazilian pepper. The property has also been impacted by historic ORV use. The property contains about 39.13 acres of upland habitats (51% of the project area) and 23.04 acres of wetland habitats (30% of the project area) as well as 14.64 acres of other surface waters (OSW) (19% of the project area). Development of the access roadway to the project site has been initiated by Collier County. Planning and permitting for the Veterans Memorial Extension will soon be underway. The proposed project is occurring on a site which has been heavily impacted by past mining and off -road vehicle activities. The proposed development does impact state jurisdictional wetlands, though these impacts have been minimized to the maximum extent practicable. The majority of the wetlands proposed to be impacted are relatively low functioning wetlands due to past impacts and exotic vegetation infestation. A wetland enhancement program is proposed which will improve the long-term viability prospect of the remaining on -site wetlands as well as provide increased functional value and wading bird foraging values to the local watershed. The preserved wetlands meet the County hierarchy with respect to native vegetation preservation requirements for the project, though they are not interconnected with each other or to the off -site Railhead Preserve. 1 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 This document provides information concerning the proposed Imperial Lakes project site as it relates to natural resources and environmental issues. It is submitted to Collier County in support of an Amended Planned Unit Development zoning request. The document was compiled by Timothy Hall, Senior Ecologist and Vice President at Turrell, Hall & Associates Inc. Mr. Hall received his Bachelor's and Master's degrees in Wildlife and Wetlands Ecology from University of Florida has been conducting wetland and wildlife surveys in Collier County for the past 25 years. 2 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PRE -DEVELOPMENT) Of the total 76.81 acres contained within the Imperial Lakes property boundary, approximately 51% are considered uplands (39.13 ac.) and 49% are considered wetlands or other surface waters (23.04 ac. of wetlands and 14.64 ac. of OSW). Several portions of the property have been infested and taken over to some degree by noxious exotic vegetation; including earleaf acacia, melaleuca and Brazilian pepper. 2.1 FLUCFCS CODES AND HABITAT DESCRIPTIONS The Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) manual was used to classify all of the vegetative communities occurring within the parcel boundaries. The attached FLUCFCS exhibit shows the subject property together with its vegetative cover and depicts the approximate limits of the wetland and upland areas. A general description is provided below in Table 1. Table 1: FLUCFCS Codes and Descriptions of Community Types FLUCFCS Code Description Acres Jurisdictional Wetlands/OSW_ 322 Coastal Scrub 3.91 No 411E1-E3 Pine Flatwoods 22.83 No 411E4 Pine Flatwoods (Brazilian pepper)** 11.50 No 414 Pine - Mesic Oak 0.89 No 520 OSW - Ponds 14.64 Yes 621E1-E3 Cypress 13.15 Yes 621E4 Cypress (Melaleuca)** 0.51 Yes 624E2 Cypress - Pine - Cabbage Palm 3.33 Yes 625E1-E3 H dric Pine Flatwoods 2.91 Yes 625E4 H dric Pine Flatwoods (Melaleuca)** 2.30 Yes 641 Freshwater Marsh 0.84 Yes Total: 76.81 23.04 / 14.64 **Areas do not qualify as native habitat under Collier County guidelines. There is a small remnant coastal scrub component in the north-west corner of the project site which has been severely impacted by off -road vehicle use. There are no other rare or exceptional vegetation associations present on the project lands. 3 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 2.2 VEGETATIVE ASSOCIATIONS A list of plant species observed within each habitat type is found below. C = Canopy M = Midstory G = Groundcover V = Vine E = Epiphyte * - Protected species 322 - Coastal Scrub, 3.91 acres in Imperial Property Slash pine Pinus elliottii C & M Dominant Saw palmetto Serenoa repens G Dominant Tarflower Bejaria racemosa G Occasional Florida rosemary Ceratiola ericoides G Common Gallberry Ilex glabra G Occasional Rusty lyonia Lyonia fruticose G Occasional Scrub oak Quercus inopina G Occasional Pennyroyal Piloblephis rigida G Occasional 411(E1-E3) - Pine Flatwoods. 29.95 acres in Imperial Pronert Slash pine Pinus elliottii C & M Dominant Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M & G Dominant Occasional Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M & G Dominant Australian Pine Casuarina equisetifolia C Common Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquinervia C, M & G Common Sand live oak Quercus geminate C Occasional Earleaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis C Occasional Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M & G Common Wax myrtle Myrica cerifera M & G Occasional Caesar weed Urena lobate G Occasional Wire grass Aristida stricta G Common Broom grass Andropogon virginicus G Common Saw palmetto Serenoa repens G Occasional Greenbriar Smilax spp. V Occasional Grapevine Vitis rotundifolia V Occasional 411(E4) - Pine Flatwoods Brazilian Penner. 4.38 acres in Imperial Pronert Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Rare Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M & G Dominant Cabbage Palm Sabal palmetto C Occasional Australian Pine Casuarina equisetifolia C Occasional Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M & G Rare Wax myrtle Myrica cerifera M & G Rare 4 to Caesar weed Greenbriar Urena lobate Smilax spp. 414 - Pine - Mesic Oak. 0.89 acres in Imperial Prover Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto Slash pine Pinus elliottii Myrsine Myrsine guianensis 621 (El-E3) - Cypress -13.15 acres in Imperial Property Cypress Taxodium distichum Melaleuca Melaleuca quiquinervia Carolina Willow Salix caroliniana Pond apple Annonna glabra Brazilian Pepper Schinus terebinthifolia Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum Alligator flag Thalia geniculata Royal fern Osmunda regalis 621 (E41 - Cvpress / Melalueca- 0.51 acres in Imperial Propert Cypress Taxodium distichum Melaleuca Melaleuca quiquinervia Slash Pine Pinus elliottii Brazilian Pepper Schinus terebinthifolia Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum 624 - Cvpress-Pine-Cabbage Palm - 3.33 acres in Imperial Proper Cypress Taxodium distichum Slash Pine Pinus elliottii Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum Sawgrass Cladium jamaicense Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 G V C C C M&G C&M C, M & G M&G M&G M G G G C C, M & G C M G C, M, & G C&M C,M&G C&M G G M&G Occasional Common Dominant Dominant Common Common Dominant Common Dominant Common Occasional Common Common Occasional Rare Rare Dominant Rare Common Common Dominant Occasional Common Common Dominant Occasional Common 625 (El-E3)- Hydric Pine Flatwoods - 3.57 acres in Imperial Property Slash pine Pinus elliottii C, M & G Dominant Dahoon holly Ilex cassine C & M Occasional Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M & G Common 5 to Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 Common to Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquinervia C, M & G Dominant Earleaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis C & M Occasional Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M & G Common Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia M Common Wax myrtle Myrica cerifera M Common Coco plum Chrysobalanus icaco M Occasional Saw grass Cladium jamaicense G Occasional Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Common Wire grass Aristida stricta G Occasional 625 (E4)- Hydric Pine Flatwoods / Melaleuca -1.64 acres in Imperial Property Slash pine Pinus elliottii C, M & G Cabbage palm Melaleuca Cypress Myrsine Brazilian pepper Wax myrtle Coco plum Sabal palmetto Melaleuca quinquinervia Taxodium distichum Myrsine guianensis Schinus terebinthifolia Myrica cerifera Chrysobalanus icaco 641- Freshwater Marsh - 0.84 acres in Imperial Property Alligator flag Thalia geniculate Pond apple Annona glabra 2.3 TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE PATTERNS AN C, M & G C M&G M M M G M Occasional Rare Dominant Rare Occcasional Common Occasional Rare Dominant Occasional According to the SFWMD, the project lands as well as surrounding off -site lands are located within the Cocohatchee drainage basin sandwiched between the much larger Estero Bay and West Collier drainage sub -basins. The basin boundary (divide) to the south generally follows Immokalee Road (SR 846) east and west approximately 1.5 miles south of the southern property boundary of the project site. The basin divide to the north generally follows the county boundary about 1 mile to the north. Historically, prior to extensive human development of the area, water generally flowed from northeast to southwest driven by the land elevations dropping toward the Gulf of Mexico. Water generally flows in this same direction but largely via the existing stormwater swales and ponds associated with the surrounding developments. Surface water moves to tide quickly once it reaches the Cocohatchee canal and river. Surface water within the project boundary is not tidally connected and has been isolated and contained by the surrounding development. Once developed, water flow will move towards the river slowly via overland flow through stormwater management lakes, pipes, and swales south and west of the project site. n Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 2.4 WETLANDS & OTHER SURFACE WATERS Qualified Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. (THA) environmental staff inspected the project site for the purpose of delineating wetlands and other surface waters. The wetland delineation methodologies and criteria set forth by the state (in Chapter 62-340, FAC, Delineation of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface Waters) and the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) (in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual) were followed in determining whether an area was considered as a wetland or other surface water and in delineating the limits (boundaries) of potential jurisdictional wetlands and other surface waters. THA biologists flagged the boundaries of those areas which are considered wetlands according to the state and federal guidelines. There were very few cases where it appeared wetland lines established based on the state methodology would differ from those established based on the federal (Corps) methodology. Where this did occur, the feature boundary was flagged based on the landward -most extent of the two methods - in other words, the methodology that produced the greatest extent of wetlands was used to flag the wetland line. Sheet 03 of the enclosed exhibits depicts wetlands present on the project lands. Within the Imperial Lakes property there are 3 distinct wetland areas which are connected to each other through the on -site ponds. These "on -site" wetlands are not individually identified and are treated as one contiguous wetland system. All of the on -site wetlands are jurisdictional to the State of Florida but are not jurisdictional to the Corps of Engineers due to the lack of open water or wetland connectivity to navigable waters. 2.4.1 Wetland Seasonal High -Water Table & Hydroperiod The hydrologic regime on this property is extremely altered from historical levels and patterns by surrounding urban uses. Seasonal high water elevations were determined using water lines, lichen lines, adventitious rooting, and other hydrologic indicators. Nails were placed in several trees at the seasonal high water level indicators and will be later surveyed to determine elevations and help establish final control elevations for the development. The wetland areas are interconnected with each other and the existing ponds. Water flow appears to be from the northeast to the south into the site. Water from adjacent properties is now mostly cut off as a result of the construction of multi -family housing developments and golf courses to the northeast and south, and the school to the east, therefore the wetland hydroperiod is driven by rainfall events. There is standing water in the ponds year-round, however the remainder of the site dries out seasonally before being inundated again during rainy season. There is no natural outfall from the project site. An outfall structure was placed in the southeast portion of the property as part of the 1990 SFWMD permitting effort. When water stages up high enough on the property, it can overflow into the outfall box which directs water into the adjacent golf course lakes. 2.4.2 Jurisdictional Status of Wetlands and Other Surface Waters Almost all of the wetlands now present on the project lands were assumed to be jurisdictional with the SFWMD. The wetland areas within the property are believed to not be jurisdictional to the Corps due to their isolation from navigable waters. Wetlands are all isolated both vegetatively 7 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 and hydrologically by surrounding developments. Flows from the property are via lakes, pipes, and swales through those developments to downstream waters. These on -site wetlands were assumed to not be Corps jurisdictional because of these factors though this determination will still need to be verified by the USACE under a formal jurisdictional determination during their review of the permit applications. The other surface waters present on the property are man-made fill pit ponds excavated in the mid-1980's for fill that was used on nearby projects and sand that was used by the nearby concrete plant. Due to the lack of connectivity via surficial permanent water connections to downstream navigable waters of the U.S. (tidal waters), these OSWs were assumed to be jurisdictional with the SFWMD but not with the Corps. 2.5 NATIVE HABITAT Collier County Land Development Code regulations require that projects preserve a portion of their on -site native habitat as part of their development proposal. Calculations are based on a percentage of the acreage of native habitat existing on the site. Since the Imperial Lakes property is greater than 20 acres in size, it will be required to preserve 25% of the native vegetation on the site. The property is 76.81 acres in size and based on the FLUCFCS mapping 14.64 acres are open water lakes and 14.31 acres are dense exotics, which did not count towards native vegetation totals. The remaining 47.86 acres qualify as existing native vegetation (see Native Vegetation Table Below). The project will be required to preserve 25% of this acreage or a minimum of 11.97 acres. The project is proposing to preserve 15.45 acres of native habitat onsite; therefore, it is compliant with the County LDC preservation requirements of section 3.05.07. Table 2: Native Vegetation Acreages Wetland Habitat FLUCCS Code Imperial Lake Acreage Native Vegetation Acreage Coastal Scrub 322 3.91 3.91 Pine Flatwoods 411 34.33 22.83 Pine - Mesic Oak 414 0.89 0.89 Man-made Ponds 520 14.64 0.00 Cypress 621 13.66 13.15 Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm 624 3.33 3.33 Hydric Pine Flatwoods 625 5.21 2.91 Freshwater Marsh 641 0.84 0.84 76.81 47.86 25% Native Vegetation Retention 11.97 Proposed Onsite Preservation 15.45 Surplus 3.48 1.1 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 2.6 LISTED PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIES Endangered species are as any species of plant, insect, or wildlife naturally occurring in Florida, whose prospects of survival are in jeopardy due to modification or loss of habitat; over -utilization for commercial, sporting, scientific or educational purposes; disease; predation; inadequacy of regulatory mechanisms; or other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence (F.S. 372.072). Threatened species include any species of plant or wildlife naturally occurring in Florida, which may not be in immediate danger of extinction, but which exist in such small populations as to become endangered if it is subjected to increased stress as a result of further modification of its environment. Several listed animal species have the potential to occur onsite. The probability of these animals utilizing suitable habitats ranges from high to low depending on the particular species. It is improbable that most of these species currently reside or nest onsite. A list of potential listed species and their designations are provided below in Table 4. Table 3: Potential Threatened and Endangered Species Common Name Scientific Name Status Eastern indigo snake Drymarchon cou eri FT Gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus ST Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus P Little blue heron Egretta caerulea ST Roseate spoonbill Platalea ajaja ST Tricolored heron Egretta tricolor ST Wood stork Mycteria americana FT Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia ST Florida bonneted bat Eumops floridanus FE FE = Federally Endangered FT = Federally Threatened ST = State Threatened P = Protected FT (S/A) = Federally designated Threatened species due to Similarity of Appearance A survey for listed animal and plant species has been conducted within the project area by THA biologists. This threatened and endangered species survey and its results are discussed in the attached Appendix B. The Threatened & Endangered Species report describes the approximate locations where listed animal species were observed on and near the project area during the course of the survey. During the survey events white ibis (Eudocimus albus), snowy egret (Egretta thula), wood stork (Mycteria americana), and little blue heron (Egretta caerulea) were observed. Several gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrows were located on or in close proximity to the site. More recent survey efforts located 22 burrows within the project boundaries. These burrows will be impacted or isolated by the proposed development and tortoises present will need to be relocated off of the project. Appropriate permits from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) will be obtained prior to construction. None of the other listed species observed reside on or nest within the project area. 6 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 Several listed animal species in addition to those documented on the project lands by TH have some potential for occurring in certain habitats present on project lands. These species are discussed in Appendix B and include; indigo snake, gopher frog, roseate spoonbill, limpkin, burrowing owl, southeastern American kestrel, Big Cypress fox squirrel, Florida bonneted bat, Florida black bear, and Florida panther. The probability of these animals utilizing suitable habitats in project lands ranges from very low to moderate depending upon the particular species (see discussion in Appendix B). It is improbable that any of these species currently reside or nest on the project lands. These listed species records and the source of these records are also discussed in Appendix B. It is highly unlikely that any federally listed plant species could be present on the project lands. Several butterfly orchids (Encyclia tampensis) were observed growing on cypress trees on the project site. These orchids are listed as "less rare' in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The orchids were located within areas proposed to be preserved so no relocation will be required. Due to isolation, exotic species encroachment, off -road vehicle use, and degradation of foraging habitat, it is apparent that this site offers only minimal value to local wildlife. The surrounding developments, golf courses and roads have partially isolated this property and made travel to it by larger terrestrial wildlife difficult. Management plans for Bald eagle, black bear, and gopher tortoises will be coordinated with FWC and FWS as appropriate and provided to the County as part of the site development reviews. 2.7 HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Florida Master Site File (MSF) is a database of the known historic and archaeological sites in the state of Florida. The MSF office was contacted and the response back indicated that there were two recorded archaeological sites in close proximity to the subject property. One of these sites (CR00737) is located right on the northern border of the site. According to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) evaluation, this site was not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The second site (CR00242) is located approximately 3/4 of a mile west of the project site and will not be affected at all by the proposed project. Given the past disturbance and mining of the site, the likelihood of any historical or archaeological site remaining is unlikely. If a suspected archaeological or historical artifact is discovered during the course of site development activities (construction, clearing, etc.), the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. 2.8 SOILS Based on the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) "Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida" (NRCS, 1998) there are five (5) different soil types (soil map units) present on the project lands. Exhibit 9 provides a soils map for the project area as derived from the NRCS mapping. The following sub -sections provide a brief description of each soil map unit identified 10 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 on the project lands. Information is provided about the soil's landscape position (i.e. it's typical location in the landscape on a county -wide basis), the soil's profile (i.e. textural composition and thickness or depth range of the layers or horizons commonly present in the soil), and the soil's drainage and hydrologic characteristics. The soils occurring on project lands are as follows: (25) Cypress Lake -Riviera -Copeland Fine Sands, Frequently Ponded These level, very poorly drained soils are found primarily in depressions, cypress swamps and marshes. This soil mapping unit is found in the southwest corner of the project area within the area identified as wetlands. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape and range from 100 to 3000 acres. The slope is 0 to 1 percent. Typically, the Cypress Lake soil has surface layer of very dark gray fine sand to a depth of about 26 inches; the upper part is light gray and the lower part is brown. The subsoil is dark grayish brown fine sandy loam to a depth of about 30 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 30 inches. Typically, the Riviera soil has a surface layer of gray fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 32 inches; the upper part is light brownish gray and the lower part is light gray. The subsoil is sandy clay loam to a depth of about 54 inches; the upper part is grayish brown and the lower part is dark gray. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 54 inches. Typically, the Copeland soil has a surface layer of black fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 18 inches; the upper part is very dark grayish brown and the lower part is dark gray. The subsoil is light gray mottled, sandy clay loam to a depth of about 24 inches. The substratum is light gray marl to a depth of about 30 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 30 inches. Areas mapped can consist entirely of Cypress lake soil, Riviera, limestone substratum, soil Copeland soil, or any combination of the three soils. These three soils were not separated in mapping because of similar management needs brought about by ponding. The characteristics of Holopaw, Malabar, and Pineda soils are similar. Soils of dissimilar characteristics included in these units are small areas of Basinger, Dania, Gator, and Hallendale soils on similar landscape positions. These soils make up about 20 percent or less of the units. The permeability of the Cypress lake soil is moderate and the available water capacity is very low. The permeability of the Riviera soils is moderately rapid to moderately slow and the available water capacity is low. The permeability of the Copeland soil is moderated and the available water capacity is moderate. In most years, under natural conditions, these soils are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more each year. In other months the water table is within 12 inches of the surface and recedes to a depth of 12 to 40 inches during extended dry periods. 11 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 These soils are not suited for cultivated crops or citrus because of flooding, ponding and wetness. These soils are used for natural wetlands. Natural vegetation consists mostly of bald cypress, pickerelweed, rushes, fire flag, saw grass and Florida willow. The Cypress lake, Riviera and Copeland soils have no range site. These soils are in the Cypress Swamp ecological community. These soils have severe limitations for all urban and recreational uses because of ponding. An effective drainage system that keeps the water table at a given depth is expensive and difficult to establish and maintain. Also, these soils act as a collecting basin for the area; therefore, a suitable outlet to remove the water is not available. These soils require an adequate amount of fill material to maintain house foundations and roadbeds above the high water table. Even when a good drainage system is installed and the proper amount of fill material is added, keeping the area dry is a continuing problem because of seepage water from the slightly higher adjacent sloughs and flatwoods. The Cypress lake, Riviera and Copeland soils are in capability subclass VIIw. (101) Basinger Fine Sand This nearly level, poorly drained soil is in sloughs and poorly defined drainage ways. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape, and they range from 20 to 800 acres in size. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. Typically, the surface layer is grayish brown fine sand about 3 inches thick. The subsurface layer is light brown fine sand to a depth of about 25 inches. The subsoil is brown fine sand to a depth of about 44 inches. The substratum is brown fine sand to a depth of about 80 inches. In 95 percent of the areas mapped as Basinger fine sand, Basinger and similar soils make up 83 to 98 percent of the map unit. In the remaining areas, the Basinger soil makes up either a higher or lower percentage of the mapped areas. The characteristics of Malabar soils are similar to those of the Basinger soil. The dissimilar soils in this map unit are small areas of Immokalee soils on flatwoods. These soils make up 17 percent or less of the map unit. The permeability of this soil is rapid. The available water capacity is low. Under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table is within a depth of 12 inches for 3 to 6 months during most years. During the other months, the water table is below a depth of 12 inches, and it recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. During periods of high rainfall, the soil is covered by shallow, slowly moving water for about 7 days. 12 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 The natural vegetation consists of scattered areas of South Florida slash pine, cypress, cabbage palms, saw palmetto, wax myrtle, blue maidencane, sand cordgrass, pineland threeawn, chalky bluestem, and St. Johns's wort. This soil is poorly suited to cultivated crops because of the wetness and droughtiness. With good water -control and soil -improving measures, this soil is suitable for many fruit and vegetable crops. A water -control system is needed to remove excess water during wet seasons and to provide water through subsurface irrigation during dry seasons. Because of the rapid permeability, the water table is difficult to maintain. Row crops should be rotated with cover crops. Seedbed preparation should include bedding of the rows. Applications of fertilizer and lime should be based on the needs of the crops. With proper water -control measures, the soil is moderately suited to citrus. A water -control system that maintains good drainage to an effective depth is needed. Planting on raised beds provides good surface and internal drainage and elevates the trees above the seasonal high water table. Planting a good grass cover crop between the trees helps to protect the soil from blowing when the trees are younger. With good water -control management, this soil is well suited to pasture. A water -control system is needed to remove excess water during the wet season. This soil is well suited to pangolagrass, bahiagrass, and clover. Excellent pastures of grass or a grass clover mixture can be grown with good management. Regular applications of fertilizer and controlled grazing are needed for the highest possible yields. This soil is well suited to range. The dominant forage consists of blue maidencane, chalky bluestem, and bluejoint panicum. Management practices should include deferred grazing. This Basinger soil is in the Slough range site. This soil has severe limitations for most urban uses because of the high water table. It has severe limitations for septic tank absorption fields because of wetness and poor filtration. Building sites and septic tank absorption fields should be mounded to overcome these limitations. This soil also has severe limitations for recreational development because of wetness and the sandy texture. The problems associated with wetness can be corrected by providing adequate drainage and drainage outlets to control the high water table. The sandy texture can be overcome by adding suitable topsoil or by resurfacing the area. This Basinger soil is in capability subclass IVw. (103) Cypress Lake -Riviera -Copeland Fine Sands, Frequently Ponded-Urban Land Association These level, very poorly drained soils are found primarily in depressions, cypress swamps and marshes. This soil mapping unit is found in the southwest corner of the project area within the area identified as wetlands. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape and range from 100 to 3000 acres. The slope is 0 to 1 percent. 13 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 Typically, the Cypress Lake soil has surface layer of very dark gray fine sand to a depth of about 26 inches; the upper part is light gray and the lower part is brown. The subsoil is dark grayish brown fine sandy loam to a depth of about 30 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 30 inches. Typically, the Riviera soil has a surface layer of gray fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 32 inches; the upper part is light brownish gray and the lower part is light gray. The subsoil is sandy clay loam to a depth of about 54 inches; the upper part is grayish brown and the lower part is dark gray. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 54 inches. Typically, the Copeland soil has a surface layer of black fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 18 inches; the upper part is very dark grayish brown and the lower part is dark gray. The subsoil is light gray mottled, sandy clay loam to a depth of about 24 inches. The substratum is light gray marl to a depth of about 30 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 30 inches. Areas mapped can consist entirely of Cypress lake soil, Riviera, limestone substratum, soil Copeland soil, or any combination of the three soils. These three soils were not separated in mapping because of similar management needs brought about by ponding. The characteristics of Holopaw, Malabar, and Pineda soils are similar. Soils of dissimilar characteristics included in these units are small areas of Basinger, Dania, Gator, and Hallendale soils on similar landscape positions. These soils make up about 20 percent or less of the units. The permeability of the Cypress lake soil is moderate and the available water capacity is very low. The permeability of the Riviera soils is moderately rapid to moderately slow and the available water capacity is low. The permeability of the Copeland soil is moderated and the available water capacity is moderate. In most years, under natural conditions, these soils are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more each year. In other months the water table is within 12 inches of the surface and recedes to a depth of 12 to 40 inches during extended dry periods. These soils are not suited for cultivated crops or citrus because of flooding, ponding and wetness. These soils are used for natural wetlands. Natural vegetation consists mostly of bald cypress, pickerelweed, rushes, fire flag, saw grass and Florida willow. The Cypress lake, Riviera and Copeland soils have no range site. These soils are in the Cypress Swamp ecological community. These soils have severe limitations for all urban and recreational uses because of ponding. An effective drainage system that keeps the water table at a given depth is expensive and difficult to establish and maintain. Also, these soils act as a collecting basin for the area; therefore, a suitable outlet to remove the water is not available. These soils require an adequate amount of fill material 14 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 to maintain house foundations and roadbeds above the high water table. Even when a good drainage system is installed and the proper amount of fill material is added, keeping the area dry is a continuing problem because of seepage water from the slightly higher adjacent sloughs and flatwoods. The Cypress lake, Riviera and Copeland soils are in capability subclass VIIw. (117) Immokalee Fine Sand This nearly level, poorly drained soil is on flatwoods. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape, and they range from 10 to 500 acres in size. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. Typically, the surface layer is black fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is light gray fine sand to a depth of about 35 inches. The subsoil is fine sand to a depth of about 58 inches. The upper part of the subsoil is black, the next part is dark reddish brown, and the lower part is dark brown. The substratum is pale brown fine sand to a depth of about 80 inches. In 95 percent of the areas mapped as Immokalee fine sand, Immokalee and similar soils make up 89 to 99 percent of the map unit. In the remaining areas, the Immokalee soil makes up either a higher or lower percentage of the mapped areas. The characteristics of Myakka and Oldsmar soils are similar to those of the Immokalee soil. The dissimilar soils in this map unit are small areas of Basinger and Holopaw soils in sloughs. These soils make up about 1 to 11 percent of the unit. The permeability of this soil is moderate. The available water capacity is low. Under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table is at a depth of 6 to 18 inches for 1 to 6 months during most years. During the other months, the water table is below a depth of 18 inches, and it recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. The natural vegetation consists of South Florida slash pine, saw palmetto, wax myrtle, chalky bluestem, creeping bluestem, and pineland threeawn. This soil is poorly suited to cultivated crops because of the wetness and droughtiness. The number of adapted crops is limited unless very intensive management practices are used. With good water -control and soil -improving measures, this soil is suitable for many fruit and vegetable crops. A water -control system is needed to remove excess water during wet seasons and to provide water through subsurface irrigation during dry seasons. Row crops should be rotated with cover crops. Seedbed preparation should include bedding of the rows. Applications of fertilizer and lime should be based on the needs of the crops. With proper water -control measures, the soil is well suited to citrus. A water -control system that maintains good drainage to an effective depth is needed. Planting on raised beds provides good surface and internal drainage and elevates the trees above the seasonal high water table. Planting 15 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 a good grass cover crop between the trees helps to protect the soil from blowing when the trees are younger. With good water -control management, this soil is well suited to pasture. A water -control system is needed to remove excess water during the wet season. This soil is well suited to pangolagrass, bahiagrass, and clover. Excellent pastures of grass or a grass -clover mixture can be grown with good management. Regular applications of fertilizer and controlled grazing are needed for the highest possible yields. This soil is moderately suited to range. The dominant forage consists of creeping bluestem, lopsided indiangrass, pineland threeawn, and chalky bluestem. Management practices should include deferred grazing and brush control. This Immokalee soil is in the South Florida Flatwoods range site. This soil has severe limitations for most urban uses and septic tank absorption fields because of the wetness. If this soil is used as a septic tank absorption field, it should be mounded to maintain the system well above the seasonal high water table. For recreational uses, this soil also has severe limitations because of wetness and the sandy texture; however, with proper drainage to remove excess surface water during wet periods, many of the effects of these limitations can be overcome. This Immokalee soil is in capability subclass IVw. (132) Rivera, Limestone Substratum, Copeland Fine Sand, Urban Land Association These level, very poorly drained soils are found primarily in flatwoods and depressions on marine terraces. This soil mapping unit is found in the southwest corner of the project area within the area identified as wetlands. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape and range from 100 to 3000 acres. The slope is 0 to 1 percent. Typically, the Riviera soil has a surface layer of gray fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 32 inches; the upper part is light brownish gray and the lower part is light gray. The subsoil is sandy clay loam to a depth of about 54 inches; the upper part is grayish brown and the lower part is dark gray. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 54 inches. Typically, the Copeland soil has a surface layer of black fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 18 inches; the upper part is very dark grayish brown and the lower part is dark gray. The subsoil is light gray mottled, sandy clay loam to a depth of about 24 inches. The substratum is light gray marl to a depth of about 30 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 30 inches. Areas mapped are generally around 36 percent Rivera, 30 percent Urban, and 27 percent Copeland. These three soils were not separated in mapping because of similar management needs brought about by ponding. The characteristics of Holopaw, Malabar, and Pineda soils are similar. 16 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 The permeability of the Riviera soil is moderately rapid to moderately slow, and the available water capacity is low. The permeability of the Copeland soil is moderate, and the available water capacity is moderate. In most years, under natural conditions, these soils are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more each year. In other months the water table is within 12 inches of the surface and recedes to a depth of 12 to 40 inches during extended dry periods. These soils are not suited for cultivated crops or citrus because of flooding, ponding and wetness. These soils are used for natural wetlands. Natural vegetation consists mostly of bald cypress, pickerelweed, rushes, fire flag, saw grass and Florida willow. These soils have severe limitations for all urban and recreational uses because of ponding. An effective drainage system that keeps the water table at a given depth is expensive and difficult to establish and maintain. Also, these soils act as a collecting basin for the area; therefore, a suitable outlet to remove the water is not available. These soils require an adequate amount of fill material to maintain house foundations and roadbeds above the high water table. Even when a good drainage system is installed and the proper amount of fill material is added, keeping the area dry is a continuing problem because of seepage water from the slightly higher adjacent sloughs and flatwoods. The, Riviera Urban and Copeland soils are in capability subclass VIIw. (133) Satellite Fine Sand This nearly level, somewhat poorly drained soil is on low coastal ridges. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape, and they range from 10 to 400 acres in size. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. Typically, the surface layer is gray fine sand about 3 inches thick. The substratum is light gray to white fine sand to a depth of about 80 inches. In 95 percent of the areas mapped as Satellite fine sand, the Satellite soil makes up 81 to 100 percent of the map unit. In the remaining areas, it makes up either a higher or lower percentage of the mapped areas. The dissimilar soils in this map unit are small areas of Oldsmar soils in landscape positions similar to those of the Satellite soil. The permeability of this soil is very rapid. The available water capacity is very low. Under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table is at a depth of 18 to 42 inches for 1 to 6 months during most years. During the other months, the water table is below a depth of 40 inches. The natural vegetation consists of Florida rosemary, sand live oak, South Florida slash pine, saw palmetto, prickly pear, pineland threeawn, and creeping bluestem. This soil is poorly suited to 17 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 cultivated crops because of the droughtiness. The number of adapted crops is limited unless very intensive management practices are used. With good water -control and soil -improving measures, this soil is suitable for many fruit and vegetable crops. A water -control system is needed to remove excess water during wet seasons and to provide water through subsurface irrigation during dry seasons. Because of the rapid permeability, the water table is difficult to maintain. Row crops should be rotated with cover crops. Seedbed preparation should include bedding of the rows. Applications of fertilizer and lime should be based on the needs of the crops. With proper water -control measures, the soil is well suited to citrus. A water -control system that maintains good drainage to an effective depth is needed. Planting on raised beds provides good surface and internal drainage and elevates the trees above the seasonal high water table. Planting a good grass cover crop between the trees helps to protect the soil from blowing when the trees are younger. The soil is moderately suited to pasture. Pangolagrass and bahiagrass are adapted species, but they produce only fair yields with good management. Regular applications of fertilizer and controlled grazing are needed for the highest possible yields. This soil is poorly suited to range. The dominant forage consists of creeping bluestem, lopsided indiangrass, pineland threeawn, and chalky bluestem. The dense growth of scrubby oaks, saw palmetto, and other shrubs dominates the desirable forage. Management practices should include deferred grazing and brush control. Livestock usually do not use this range site, except for protection as dry -bedding ground during the wet seasons. This Satellite soil is in the Sand Pine Scrub range site. This soil has severe limitations for most urban uses because of wetness and droughtiness. It has severe limitations for septic tank absorption fields because of wetness and poor filtration. If this soil is used as a septic tank absorption field, it should be mounded to maintain the system well above the seasonal high water table. For recreational uses, this soil also has severe limitations because of wetness and the sandy texture; however with proper drainage to remove excess surface water during wet periods, many of the effects of the wetness can be overcome. Suitable topsoil or other material should be added to improve trafficability. This Satellite soil is in capability subclass VIs. IM TABLE 4. IMPERIAL LAKES PROJECT CUMULATIVE ACREAGE SUMMARY LAND TYPES IMPERIAL LAKES PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPOSED PROTECT -PROPERTY ACREAGE EXISTING CONDITIONS Total Area 78.28 Acres Road Right of Way 1.47 Acres Project Site 76.81 Acres Existing Wetlands &Waters Wetlands 23.04 Acres OSW 14.64 Acres man-made fill it ponds) TOTAL Wetlands &Waters 37.68 Acres Uplands 39.13 Acres PROPOSED PROTECT ACREAGE Wetlands to be Impacted Wetland Impacts Direct 9.29 Wetland Impacts Secondary 2.07 TOTAL Wetlands to be Impacted 11.36 Acres Uplands to be Developed 37.43 Acres Wetlands &Waters to be Enhanced and Preserved Wetlands 13.75 Acres Uplands to be Enhanced and Preserved Uplands 1.70 Acres TOTAL Lands Preserved 15.45 Acres Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 3 PROPOSED CONDITIONS POST DEVELOPMENT) 3.1 PROPOSED PROJECT The purpose of the proposed Imperial Lakes project is to develop a new residential community within the northern Collier County area. The location of the project is in a region where there is currently a demand for upscale home sites with access to community amenities such are found in the northern Collier County area (access to beaches, golf courses, shopping, etc.). Various acreage estimates for the proposed project are provided in Table 4 below. 19 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 The proposed project will impact a portion of the existing wetlands on the development site (approximately 9.29 acres of direct impacts and 2.07 acres of secondary impacts). The wetlands that will be directly impacted have been degraded to varying degrees by exotic vegetation infestations and alteration of the hydrology on -site and off -site. The enclosed exhibit (Sheet 06) illustrates the wetlands that will be impacted by development. 3.2 PROJECT IMPACTS TO WETLANDS 3.2.1 Direct, Permanent Impacts Development of the proposed project cannot be done without impacting some wetlands. The location of the wetlands across the project site are spread throughout the project area. The proposed development will result in direct, permanent impacts on the project site to a total of 9.29 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and 2.07 acres of secondary impacts. Please see attached Exhibit (Sheet 06) for more detail. As used herein, the term "direct impacts" refers to actions that will result in the complete elimination of jurisdictional areas (i.e. dredging and filling). The remainder of the existing wetlands on -site will be preserved (13.75 acres which includes the secondary impacted areas). The wetlands proposed to be impacted are all somewhat degraded by exotic vegetation. The proposed project is occurring on a site which has been heavily impacted by past mining and off -road vehicle activities. The wetlands proposed to be impacted are relatively low functioning wetlands due to these past impacts and the exotic vegetation infestation. UMAM scores for the existing functional values of these wetlands range from 0.30-0.63. The wetlands to be preserved on the eastern side of the property are contiguous to off -site preserve associated with the high school and eagle nest tree. The wetlands to be preserved internal to the development adjacent to the existing man-made fill pit ponds are of the highest quality and diversity. Transient use of these wetlands by wading birds will continue to be available within the preserves proposed. 3.2.2 Temporary Impacts Minimal temporary impacts are expected with this development. Prior to construction commencement all preserved areas will be enclosed with siltation -prevention devices, which will remain in place until the adjacent construction is completed. Temporary impacts may occur within the preserve areas as a result of the exotic removal activities. Any impacts will be restored immediately following the exotic removal. 3.2.3 Secondary Impacts to Wetlands and Water Resources The proposed layout of the project's development features will result in 2.07 acres of secondary impacts due to encroachment of the development. Secondary impacts were calculated for those wetland areas where there is not a minimum 25 foot naturally vegetated upland buffer between the development and the wetland. This is consistent with the State's Environmental Resource 20 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 Permitting guidelines. The proposed wetland and upland preserve along the eastern boundary will prevent additional secondary impacts to any off -site wetland areas. 3.2.4 Cumulative Impacts to Wetlands Most of the lands around the proposed project lands have already been developed with a mix of residential and golf course construction. There are two remaining partially undeveloped properties to the southwest of the proposed project which are part of the concrete plant. The two properties to the north and west are lands purchased under the Conservation Collier program and are currently designated as the Railhead Scrub Preserve so future development of these parcels is not anticipated. As such, no adverse cumulative impacts are anticipated with the currently proposed project. Mitigation for the project will comply with the State guidelines and be purchased from a mitigation bank that has a service area covering the project site. If an out -of - basin mitigation bank is used, the appropriate proximity factor as outlined in SB 492. 3.3 PRESERVATION OF WETLANDS, OTHER SURFACE WATERS, AND UPLANDS Development of the proposed Imperial Lakes project will impact 9.29 acres of the existing wetlands within the property boundaries. The proposed project will impact predominately disturbed, exotic infested habitat areas on the property. Higher quality native wetland areas will be preserved. All of the preserved areas will be enhanced through the removal of exotic vegetation and improvements to hydrology. The proposed Imperial Lakes project will include 4 conservation areas within the project boundaries which will contain preserved and enhanced wetlands and uplands. These conservation areas will include the two cypress domes adjacent to the existing pit ponds, the wet flatwood habitat in the northeast corner of the property, and the buffer zone around the eagle nest tree along the eastern boundary. The attached Exhibits (Sheet 07) illustrate the location of the proposed conservation areas. The preserved wetlands will be hydrologically connected to the stormwater management lakes within the development. Once water quality treatment criteria have been met, water can enter into the wetlands from the lakes and contribute to the hydrologic connectivity and health of the wetlands. All of the preserved areas will be placed under appropriate conservation easements as required, which will protect the future integrity of the wetland and upland habitats contained in these areas. Appropriate access easements will also be provided to ensure future maintenance of the preserved areas can be undertaken. All preserve areas will be delineated and marked with appropriate signage identifying the preserve boundary and restrictions associated with the preserve. Signage will be placed at least 150 feet apart and no more than 300 feet apart along all interfaces with the development. Signage will not be placed along the shared borders with existing Conservation lands or lakes. 21 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 3.4 PROJECT IMPACT TO LISTED SPECIES A survey for listed animal and plant species was initially conducted on the project site by THA biologists in 2014 and updated in late 2016/early 2017 and more recently in 2024/2025. The listed animals associated with this project site as observed directly or indirectly by THA included the white ibis, snowy egret, wood stork, and little blue heron. During the initial surveys conducted in 2014, several gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrows were also located on -site. More recent survey updates have located 22 burrows within the Imperial Lakes property and several more within the adjacent roadway ROW. These burrows will be impacted or isolated by the proposed site plan and will need to be relocated. Appropriate permits from FWC will be required prior to any land clearing activities. A small alligator was also documented in the northern pond. Currently there is one documented active eagle's nests within very close proximity of the project site. Nest number C0071 is located along the eastern property boundary between this project site and the adjacent high school. This nest was documented as active in 2024/25 nesting season. Additionally, nest number C00047 is located approximately 0.5 miles to the south and was last documented as active in 2014. And nest C0001 is located approximately 1 mile to the southwest of the project site and was last documented as active in 2015. A few listed animal species, in addition to those documented, have the potential to occur in certain habitats present on -site. These species include but are not limited to the indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi), tricolor heron (Egretta tricolor), roseate spoonbill (Platalea ajaja), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger), and Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus). The probability of these animals utilizing suitable on -site habitats ranges from high to low depending on the particular species. It is improbable that any of these species currently reside or nest on -site. The following subsections provide an assessment of the proposed project's potential impacts to various listed animal species. The species addressed include those observed on or in close proximity to the subject property as well as certain species that could potentially occur on the Imperial Lakes site or on nearby off -site parcels. Wood Storks (Mt/cteria americans) No wood stork nests, rookeries, or roosting sites have been found on the subject property though one wood stork was observed foraging in the freshwater marsh area during the listed species investigations. The closest documented wood stork colony is located approximately 11 miles to the northeast at Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary. The site is appropriate for foraging within the littoral zone of the existing man-made fill pit ponds, cypress habitats, and freshwater marsh habitats. The small cypress area immediately adjacent to the open waters of the pit pond could be appropriate for establishment of a small rookery. This cypress area adjacent to the existing pond will be preserved under the current project proposal. The proposed project will impact 9.29 acres of wetlands on -site, however these areas are of lower value foraging habitat for the wood stork. The foraging opportunities provided can vary significantly during a given year due to a wide array of factors that include but are not limited to: water levels present; variable abundance of prey species; and available access of prey species 22 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 to wetland areas. The proposed wetland preserve area will result in the preservation and enhancement of suitable wood stork foraging habitats. Proposed Determination of Effect: Given these considerations, use of the USFWS Wood Stork Key, outlined in the USFWS South Florida Programmatic Concurrence Letter dated January 25, 2010 and the May 18, 2010 addendum, to conduct a sequential effect determination for the species resulted in the following key sequential determination: A-B-C-E-NLAA and it is concluded that the proposed project "may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect" wood storks (MANLAA). Various Listed Wading Birds Snowy egrets (Egretta thula), little blue herons (Egretta caerulea), and white ibis (Eudocimus alba) have been documented in the wetlands on -site and within the vicinity of the site. No nests of these species have been observed within the project area. In addition to the observed species, other listed wading birds that could frequent appropriate habitats within the project area include roseate spoonbills (Platalea ajaja), tricolor herons (Egretta tricolor), and limpkins (Aramus guarauna). Development of the project area will result in the loss of 9.29 acres of on -site wetlands that could be utilized by the wading birds mentioned, though it is important to note that the majority of these wetlands are infested by dense exotic vegetation and do not provide high quality foraging opportunities. The on -site preserve will enhance and protect 13.75 acres of appropriate on -site habitats that could be utilized by foraging wading birds in addition to maintaining the lake shorelines where the majority of foraging activities have been observed. Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus Polyphemus) There are two suitable gopher tortoise habitat areas on this site. Both areas are coastal scrub and dominated by saw palmetto, scrub oak, and other upland shrubs. The larger of the two areas is located on the northwest corner of the property and contains a majority (all except for 2) of the burrows observed on site. All documented burrows located were georeferenced by handheld GPS and are shown on the attached Listed Species Observations Exhibit. A summary of the results gives; Potentially Occupied burrows -16 Abandoned burrows - 6 Total burrows - 22 To estimate the population of tortoises actually on the site a correction factor is applied to the number of active plus inactive burrows. The correction factor reflects the habitat type and the estimated utilization of burrows across the site. Using the FWC protocols of 0.50 times the number of potentially occupied burrows results in (16 * 0.50 = 8) tortoises on -site. However, based on our site analysis we believe the number could be closer to 60% of the burrows on site, which would increase the number of tortoises to (16*0.60=10). 23 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 Relocation methods will involve a combination of mechanical and hand digging. All burrows will be surveyed again prior to relocation and all active and inactive burrows within the proposed development footprint will be excavated. Where mechanical methods are employed (digging with a small backhoe), digging by hand will take over during the last few feet. Any tortoise burrow that lies within the proposed upland preserve and is greater than 25 feet from the proposed impacts will be left undisturbed. Proposed Determination of Effect: The gopher tortoise was listed as threatened by the FWC in 2007. While it is not federally listed, it is a candidate for listing and protected under the current State of Florida regulations. Coordination with the FWC and adherence with all state guidelines will ensure that that no adverse impacts occur to the gopher tortoise. Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais coy eri� No indigo snakes have been observed on -site, however the majority of the project area does provide suitable habitat for indigo snakes. Considering their elusive nature, their large home range, and the wide array of habitats they may utilize, there is potential that indigo snakes could occasionally frequent portions of the project area. The presence of gopher tortoise burrows observed during the surveys conducted on the project site indicate that there is potential for indigo snake utilization on -site, as well as the presence of suitable habitats. Proposed Determination of Effect: In consideration of these points and given the potential probability of any indigo snakes occurring on the project lands, use of the USFWS Eastern Indigo Snake Key outlined in the USFWS' North and South Florida Programmatic Concurrence Letter, dated January 25, 2010 and the August 13, 2013 Addendum, to conduct a sequential effect determination for the species resulted in the following key sequential determination: A-B-C-D-E- NLAA and results in a "May affect, not likely to adversely affect" determination for this species. Florida Bonneted Bat (Eumops oridanus) The Florida bonneted bat (FBB) utilizes habitats such as hardwoods and pinelands for foraging. The project area consists of pine flatwoods, pine-mesic oak, and cypress -pine -palm habitats suitable for Florida bonneted bat foraging though it is important to note that much of this habitat is densely infested with exotic vegetation which would preclude bat flight through the forested areas. Much of this habitat will be impacted with the development of the proposed project, however, following the enhancement activities, the entire preserve area will consist of open forested habitat suitable (1.70 acres of pine flatwoods, 8.28 acres of cypress wetlands, 1.22 acres of cypress -pine -cabbage palm, and 3.42 acres of hydric pine) that will be restored to open forested habitats) for Florida bonneted bat foraging. The project will also preserve and maintain 0.83 acre of freshwater marsh. The project site is located within the FBB consultation area but is not located within any of the Focal Areas that have been designated by FWS. 24 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 Surveys of the site have been conducted to search for potential roosts. Cavity trees observed were peeped to determine if any roosting was present. To date no evidence of any bat presence on the site has been observed. Proposed Determination of Effect: Based on our analysis of the existing conditions of the site, the proposed, enhanced, open forested preserve areas, and the lack of any documented FBB presence, our use of the USFWS Florida Bonneted Bat Consultation Key provided in the USFWS' Florida Bonneted Bat Consultation Guidelines, 2024 Revision resulted in the following key sequential determination: 1a-2a-3c-4b-9b-11a-NLAA with required BMPs and results in a "May affect, not likely to adversely affect" determination for this species as long as appropriate BMPS are enacted within the development. Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus !t erg The Big Cypress Fox Squirrel has not been observed on -site or in the ROW, however they have been known to utilize habitats such as cypress, cypress -pine -cabbage palm, and pine flatwoods that do exist on the project site. They are also documented on the golf courses to the south and northeast of the project site. Much of the habitat has been infested with dense exotic vegetation which precludes fox squirrel use and foraging. The proposed project would result in impacts to 5.39 acres of cypress, 2.11 acres of cypress -pine -cabbage palm, and 1.79 acres of hydric pine flatwoods. Fox squirrels have been shown in many locations to prefer suburban habitats including golf courses and low -density residential areas. The area surrounding the Imperial Lakes project does contain golf courses and residential components. There are suitable preferred habitats on -site as well, a portion of which will be preserved (1.70 acres of pine flatwoods, 8.28 acres of cypress wetlands,1.22 acres of cypress -pine - cabbage palm, and 3.42 acres of hydric pine). The preserve habitats will be enhanced for fox squirrel utilization through the elimination of exotic vegetation and the opening up of the site through said removal. With the preservation and enhancement of suitable habitat and the proximity of the preserves to the adjacent open golf course, little effect to the Big Cypress fox squirrel is expected. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) There is an eagle nest located along the eastern property line of the project site. A 330 foot buffer will be left around the nest tree and development will be timed so that work between 660 and 330 feet of the nest tree will be done outside of the eagle nesting season. Proposed Determination of Effect: Eagle nesting and utilization has been documented on the project site. Since the proposed development is less than 660 feet from the eagle nest tree, permitting under the Bald and Golden Eagle protection act will likely be required. The project will pursue an incidental take permit from the FWS for development impacts within the 660 to 330 foot buffer around the nest. The 330 foot buffer around the nest will be cleared of exotic vegetation and preserved as natural habitat. 25 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 3.5 PROJECT IMPACTS TO ARCHAEOLOGICAWHISTORICAL RESO CES The Florida Master Site File (MSF) is a database of the known historic and archaeological sites in the state of Florida. The MSF office was contacted and the response back indicated that there were two recorded archaeological sites in close proximity to the subject property. One of these sites (CR00737) is located right on the northern border of the site. According to the MSF this site is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The second recorded site is located approximately 3/4 of a mile west of the project site near US 41 and will not be impacted at all by the proposed project. Should any archaeological evidence be discovered during construction, the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. 26 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 4 AVOID E AND MINIMIZATION OF WETLAND IMPACTS Alternative Site Plans The applicant has made all appropriate and practicable steps to minimize impacts to existing jurisdictional wetlands. The final site plan as presented in this document shows that the majority of the higher quality natural wetlands within the project boundary have been avoided. The wetland preserves will be avoided and tied into the project's surface water management system so that hydrology is maintained and improved over the current conditions. The preservation of upland and wetland areas along the eastern boundary will provide a buffer between the development and the adjacent eagle nest tree. Avoidance During; Construction During construction, appropriate best management practices will be employed to help protect water quality and avoid the discharge of sediments and/or turbid water from the project site into both the on -site and off -site wetlands. The specific erosion/sediment/turbidity control methods and devices used will conform to applicable standards and criteria set forth in the "FDER Florida Development Manual," Sections 6-301 through 6-500 (FDER. 1988. "The Florida Development Manual: A Guide to Sound Land and Water Management," Chapter 6: "Storm Water and Erosion Control Best Management Practices for Developing Areas; Guidelines for Using Erosion and Sediment Control Practices," ES BMP 1.01-1.67. FDER, Tallahassee, FL.). These methods will also conform to applicable standards and guidelines set forth in the "Florida Stormwater, Erosion, and Sedimentation Control Inspector's Manual" (FDEP, 2002). The boundaries of all the wetland areas adjacent to the construction activities will be delineated with silt fencing in order to clearly identify the wetland areas and to protect them from inadvertent impacts or encroachment by the machinery during project construction. Preserve Management Plan The Imperial Lakes project has proposed to establish on -site preserve areas to minimize wetland impacts associated with the proposed residential development. The project will also undertake enhancement activities within the preserved areas which will improve the functional value of the wetlands and ensure that no long-term impacts will occur as a result of the proposed development activities. A Management Plan for the short and long-term enhancement and maintenance activities will be created and submitted for review at the time of the site development plan approval. 27 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 5 PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH COME The following Section outlines how the project is consistent with the Goals and Objectives of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Each of the 13 Goals of the CCME is listed along with how that Goal is applicable to the proposed project. For those Goals that are not applicable, no further description is included. GOAL 1: TO PLAN FOR THE PROTECTION, CONSERVATION, MANAGEMENT AND APPROPRIATE USE OF THE COUNTY'S NATURAL RESOURCES. This Goal is more applicable to the County process in general than to any single project. The project has used data available from the County resources to plan the project and protect species, habitats, and resources to the greatest extent practicable. GOAL 2: TO PROTECT THE COUNTY'S SURFACE AND ESTUARINE WATER RESOURCES. The Project will undergo review by the South Florida Water Management District as part of the ERP process. The project will also be reviewed by County reviewers during the PUD and SDP applications. Surface water management, water quality concerns, and outfall quantities and locations will all undergo review and will be consistent with any regional or local Watershed Management Plans. The Project stormwater will meet all applicable State and Local water quality criteria. GOAL 3: TO PROTECT THE COUNTY'S GROUND WATER RESOURCES TO ENSURE THE HIGHEST WATER QUALITY PRACTICAL. The Project will undergo review by the South Florida Water Management District as part of the ERP process. Groundwater extractions for the purposes of irrigation may be permitted upon SFWMD review. Any irrigation use will be monitored to ensure that adverse impacts to groundwater resources are not adversely impacted. GOAL 4: TO CONSERVE, PROTECT AND APPROPRIATELY MANAGE THE COUNTY'S FRESH WATER RESOURCES. The Project will undergo review by the South Florida Water Management District as part of the ERP process. Groundwater extractions for the purposes of irrigation may be permitted upon SFWMD review. If applicable and available, the Project will utilize treated effluent (re -use) water for irrigation. GOAL 5: TO PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE THE COUNTY'S MINERAL AND SOIL RESOURCES. The Project site was formerly permitted as a mining operation and the resultant lakes will be incorporated into the Project stormwater management system under the current residential development proposal. No future mineral extraction is contemplated on the Project property. 0. Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 The Project will utilize appropriate BMPs to protect soils on the project site from erosion or disturbance during construction activities. Silt fencing, protective barriers, berms, and swales could all be used during construction activities on the site. GOAL 6: TO IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. The Project as proposed is consistent with Goal 6 and its objectives specifically; Objective 6.1 - The Project will preserve a minimum of 25% of the existing native habitat on the project site. The property contains 47.86 acres of native vegetation and is required to preserve a minimum of 11.97 acres. As proposed, the project will preserve 15.45 acres of native habitats. In addition, the areas proposed for preservation meet the hierarchy standards of this Objective in that the areas are utilized by listed species and do include the higher functional wetlands. Because of the separation of the high -quality areas by water and dense exotic vegetation, the preserves are not interconnected within the site. One of the preserve areas is contiguous with offsite lands to the east while the remaining three preserves are completely contained within the development area. Objective 6.2 - The Project will preserve higher quality functional wetlands within the project boundary and will appropriately mitigate for lost functions through purchase of mitigation credits from an approved wetland mitigation bank. Valuation of the functionality of the wetlands to be impacted and the mitigation requirements will be reviewed by both the SFWMD and the USACE as part of the ERP review process. Preservation of the higher quality wetland habitats will be a priority for the state and federal permitting agencies. Objective 6.5 - The Project is adjacent to the Conservation Collier Railhead preserve lands. Appropriate buffers and setbacks from construction activities on the project site will be maintained from this existing adjacent preserve. GOAL 7: TO PROTECT AND CONSERVE THE COUNTY'S FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. The Project as proposed is consistent with Goal 7 and its objectives specifically; Objective 7.1 - The Project has conducted a Protected Species Survey over the Project lands. This survey will be updated periodically during the permitting process to ensure that new species do not take up residence on the Project lands without knowledge. Lands known to be inhabited by listed species, such as the eagle nest tree along the east property line of the project have been proposed for preservation. Species Management Plans will be completed for the Project which will outline how the proposed project can move forward while minimizing the risk of adversely impacting any protected species. Coordination and review with both the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) will be undertaken to ensure that potential impacts to state and federally protected species are minimized. GOAL 8: TO MAINTAIN COLLIER COUNTY'S EXISTING AIR QUALITY. The Project will comply with all applicable State and Federal air quality standards. All site construction equipment will be maintained appropriately in terms of emissions standards and potential air pollution. 29 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 GOAL 9: TO APPROPRIATELY MANAGE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE TO PROTECT THE COUNTY'S POPULOUS AND NATURAL RESOURCES AND TO ENSURE THE HIGHEST ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. This Goal is more applicable to County efforts than to individual projects. Consistent with Objective 9.3, the project will encourage resident participation in hazardous waste collection days to try and help ensure that household hazardous wastes are disposed of properly in coordination with the County's efforts. GOAL 10: TO PROTECT, CONSERVE, MANAGE, AND APPROPRIATELY USE THE COUNTY'S COASTAL BARRIERS INCLUDING SHORELINES, BEACHES AND DUNES AND PLAN FOR, AND WHERE APPROPRIATE, RESTRICT ACTIVITIES WHERE SUCH ACTIVITIES WILL DAMAGE OR DESTROY COASTAL RESOURCES. This Project will not affect any coastal barriers, dunes, beaches, shorelines, or any other coastal resources. GOAL 11: TO PROVIDE FOR THE PROTECTION, RESERVATION, AND SENSITIVE RE- USE OF HISTORIC RESOURCES. This Project will not affect any historical or archaeological properties or resources. GOAL 12: TO MAKE EVERY REASONABLE EFFORT TO ENSURE THE PUBLIC SAFETY, HEALTH AND WELFARE OF PEOPLE AND PROPERTY FROM THE EFFECTS OF HURRICANE STORM DAMAGE. The Project is not located within the County's Coastal High Hazard Area. All building construction on the Project will be subject to building code regulation and will adhere to construction standards with respect to wind loadings and hurricane protection. On -site construction will have a hurricane preparedness plan outlining steps to follow should a hurricane approach while site construction is under way. GOAL 13: TO AVOID UNNECESSARY DUPLICATION OF EXISTING REGULATORY PROGRAMS. The Project will undergo review by the SFWMD, the USACE, the FWC, and the FWS. All correspondence and permitting undertaken with these agencies will be provided to the County upon request to assist with County review and minimize duplication of permitting efforts. 30 APPENDIX A: EXHIBITS S—F^—FE OF FLC)P.,ID^ 11 EVERGLADES CITY COLLIER COUNTY SUBJECT 70FT.MYERQS VNAPLAS MIA I D' KEY WEST v- -#'-Q SITE ADDRESS <>00146640104,00145720106,00146080007,00153160 —NAPLES.FL NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURP AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION — LATITUDE: N 26.298232 — LONGITUDE: W -81.787992 Buup Ran pub Caa/�fev4 'ur WCA.Ukri-Vd h Rd O'l VICINITY MAP COUNTY AERIAL 1-19 DESIGNED: TH I Twell, Hall & Associates, Inc. I M F> I—= FZ I A I— LAKES DRAWN BY RMJ 2. Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED 07-31-25 3 JOB NO, 7372 4. )��3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 LOCATION MAP SHEET NO. 01 OF 13 1 I Email: tunaCawnell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E ROADWAY DEDICATION (1.47 AC)�'f,. 25500 1000 SC�fLE 9N ��2:7 I I SUBJECT I PROPERTY NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "Q. GRADY MINOR' SURVEY DATED: 8-19-13 DESIGNED: TH 1, Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. I M P S IR I A L L A K E S DRAWN BY: RMJ 2. Marine 0- Enviroment, 1 Consulting CREATED: 07-31-25 3. OG 1: 1 l� 1 JOB NO.: 1342 4. P2��773584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 EXISTING AERIAL SHEET NO.: 102 OF 13 5. Email:tllna®tall-associates.com Phone:(239) 643.0166 Fax: (239)643.6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E 322 411 E2 ROADWAY DEDICATION (1.47 AC) 625 SUBJECT PROPERTY 411E4 621 322 624E2 520 411E2 - 621 641 --621E3 Zol 621E4 411 621 E2 520 621 625 414 621 E2 i 641 411E4 411E3 411 E 621 E2 J —v w S 0 250 500 +ol JC7{LE 9N �EE� FLUCCS DESCRIPTION AREA (AC) 322 COASTAL SCRUB 3.91 411 PINE FLATWOODS 0.96 411 E2 PINE FLATWOODS 15.77 411E3 PINE FLATWOODS 6.10 411E4 PINE FLATWOODS 11.50 414 PINE & MESIC OAK 0.89 520 LAKES 14.64 621 CYPRESS 4.63 621 E2 CYPRESS 8.05 621 E3 CYPRESS 0.47 621 E4 CYPRESS 0.51 624E2 CYPRESS -PINE -CABBAGE PALM 3.33 625 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 1.31 625E2 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 1.60 625E4 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 2.30 641 FRESHWATER MARSHES 0.84 TOTAL 76.81 EXOTICS NOTE: E1: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING <25% EXOTIC SPECIES. E2: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING 25-50 % EXOTIC SPECIES. E3: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING 50-75 % EXOTIC SPECIES. E4: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING>75% EXOTIC SPECIES. Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. DESIGNED TH 2. M P E R I A L L A K E S DRAWN D: RMJ 2. Marne 9 LnYlr01)men 1 Consulting g CREATED: 1342 25 3. OG 1: 1 l� 1 JOB NO.: 1342 4. IP2��773584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 SITE F L U C C S MAP SHEET NO.: 03 OF 13 5. Email:tuna®tall-associates.com Phene:(239) 643.0166 Fax: (239)643.6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25F UPLAND (ACRES): 39.13 ® WETLAND (ACRES): 23.04 OSW (ACRES): 14.64 PROJECT (ACRES): 76.81 NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "Q. GRADY MINOR" SURVEY DATED: 8-19-13 1 — — 322 411 E2 625E4 411 E4 621 322 624E2 520 411 E4 411E2 621 641 520 411 621 E 621 625 414 6 21 E2 641 411E3 1 E 621 E2 —v w Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Marine & Environmental Consulting P2��>�358Mxchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 Email: tuna®tall-assoeiates.00m Phone: (239) 643.0166 Fax: (239) 643.6632 r3.C';1,AT — SUBJECT E3 PROPERTY E4 s a ego goo f000 S00CE 9N FEE7 FLUCCS DESCRIPTION AREA (AC) 322 COASTAL SCRUB 3.91 411 PINE FLATWOODS 0.96 411E2 PINE FLATWOODS 15.77 411E3 PINE FLATWOODS 6.10 414 PINE & MESIC OAK 0.89 621 CYPRESS 4.63 621 E2 CYPRESS 8.05 621E3 CYPRESS 0.47 624E2 CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM 3.33 625 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 1.31 625E2 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 1.60 641 FRESHWATER MARSHES 0.84 TOTAL 47.86 NATIVE HABITAT ACRES : 47.86 EXOTICNOTE: ( ) El: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING <25% EXOTIC SPECIES. E2: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING 25-50 % EXOTIC SPECIES. E3: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING 50-75 % EXOTIC SPECIES. NATIVE VEGETATION E4: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING>75% EXOTIC SPECIES. 47.86 ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION. GMP NOTES: REQUIRES 25% PRESERVATION OF NATIVE THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND VEGETATION. FOR THIS SITE, A MINIMUM OF ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. 11.97 ACRES OF NATIVE VEGETATION MUST BE SURVEY COURTESY OF: "Q. GRADY MINOR" PRESERVED. SURVEY DATED: 8.19.13 M P E R I A I— L A K FEE `E3 NATIVE HABITAT MAP DESIGNED: TH 1Ew. BRAWN BY: RMJ — TREATED: 07-31-25 3. E JOB NO.: 1342 4. SHEET NO.: 04 OF 13 5. SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E A O O m N m l t In= `/rOSED �CPMENT f / f �I /f /f ff fj f f/ /f fj f fj f ff f / f /f f PROPOSED / I PRESERVE PROPOSED PRESERVE PROPOSED PRESERVE SUBJECT PROPERTY PROPOSED PRESERVE PROPERTY AREAS TYPE AREA SITE 76.81 S' 0 250 goo f000 SCAZZ 9N?EE7 DESIGNED: TH 1. Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. M P E R I A L LA K E S DRAWN BY RMJ 2 Marine & Environmental Consulting JOB NO.: 342 CREATED: 125 3. 342 4. 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104.3732 PROPOSED SITE SHEET NO.: 05 OF 13 5. Email:taaa@turrell-assoelates.uom Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax:(239) 643-6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E I SECONDARY WETLAND IMPACTS EXISTING LAKE I 'r r r r jr WETLAND r IMPACTS r r rr r rr EXISTING LAKE SUBJECT �� PROPERTY ♦♦♦Oi♦i♦i ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Marine & Environmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104.3732 Email: t ma@harell-assoeiates.eom Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643a , h -_ 1 I t . WETLAND IMPACT (AC) 9.29 © SECONDARY WETLAND IMPACT (AC) 2.07 NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "Q. GRADY MINOR" SURVEY DATED: 8-19-13 b, V- 3v� x >E 0 250 500 foe SCALE9NFEE7 SITE WETLANDS IMPACTS FLUCCS DESCRIPTION AREA (AC) 621 CYPRESS 1.98 621E2 CYPRESS 3.38 621E3 CYPRESS 0.03 624E2 CYPRESS -PINE -CABBAGE PALM 2.11 625 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 0.28 625E2 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 0.80 625E4 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 0.71 TOTAL 9.29 SITE SECONDARY WETLANDS IMPACTS FLUCCS DESCRIPTION AREA (Ac) 621 CYPRESS 0.35 621E2 CYPRESS 0.73 621E3 CYPRESS 0.02 624E2 CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM 0.39 625 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 0.08 625E2 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 0.12 625E4 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 0.38 TOTAL 2.07 EXOTICS NOTE: E1: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING <25 % EXOTIC SPECIES. E2: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING 25-50 % EXOTIC SPECIES. E3: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING 50-75 % EXOTIC SPECIES. E4: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING >75 % EXOTIC SPECIES. ED: TH 1- IMPERIAL LAKES DRAWN BY: I ^ CREATED: 07--31-25 13. - - - - JOB NO.: 1342 4. SITE IMPACTS MAP SHEET NO.: 06 OF 13 15. 1 1 1 1- I-E-1--ESECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E 11 PROPOSED PRESERVE \11 �� I PROPOSED PRESERVE r'r�r�i r rrrrrr r I rr i PRO 0 DEVEL01� r r rr rr rr rr rrrr rr✓ PROPOSEDI PRESERVE I L PROPOSED I PRESERVE 7) — SUBJECT PROPERTY 0 250 500 1000 SCALE9N'FEE7 ® UPLAND (ACRES): 1.70 WETLAND (ACRES): 13.75 TOTAL PRESERVE (ACRES): 15.45 (REQUIRED PRESERVE 11.97 AC.) NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND EXOTICS NOTE: ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. E1: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING <25% EXOTIC SPECIES. - - T E2: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING 25-50% EXOTIC SPECIES. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "0. GRADY MINOR" E3' INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING 50-75% EXOTIC SPECIES. SURVEY DATED: 8-19-13 E4: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING >75% EXOTIC SPECIES. Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. DESIGNED: TH 2. M P E R I A L L A K E S DRAWN B. RMJ 2. Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 1342 25 3. JOB NO.: 1342 4. 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 341043132 PRESERVES MAP SHEET NO.: 07 OF 13 s. Email:tana@tulnll-associates.com Phone: (239)643.0166 Fax: (239)643.6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E FLUCCS DESCRIPTION AREA (AC) 411 PINE FLATWOODS 0.64 411E2 PINE FLATWOODS 0.38 411E3 PINE FLATWOODS 0.66 411E4 PINE FLATWOODS 0.02 621 CYPRESS 2.66 621E2 CYPRESS 4.66 621E3 CYPRESS 0.45 621E4 CYPRESS 0.51 624E2 CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM 1.22 625 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 1.03 625E2 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 0.80 625E4 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 1.59 641 FRESHWATER MARSHES 0.83 TOTAL 15.45 25 101 � 117 1 132 117 — 1 103 103 0 N 128 S 0 250 500 a000 J'C7{LE 7N �EE7 L31 UBJECT ROPERTY CODE DESCRIPTION HYDRIC ACRES CYPRESS LAKE-RIVIERA-COPELAND 25 FINE SANDS, FREQ. PONDED YES 5.35 99 WATER 14.01 101 BASINGER FINE SAND YES 29.69 CYPRESS LAKE-RIVIERA-COPELAND FINE 103 SANDS, FREQUENTLY PONDED-URBAN YES 25.30 LAND ASSOCIATION 117 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND 0.97 RIVIERA, LIMESTONE 132 SUBSTRATUM-COPELAND FINE YES 0.40 SAND -URBAN LAND ASSOCIATION 133 SATELLITE FINE SAND 1.09 TOTAL 76.81 DESIGNED: TH 1. Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. I M P E R I A L L A K E S DRAWN BY RMJ 2 ---_ Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 07-31-25 3. JOB NO.: 1342 4. 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104.3732 SOILS MAP SHEET NO.: 08 OF 13 s. E41: hma@tmrell-associws.Com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E AB GT PO ■ ■ LJ SE AA GT O LB �- AA® B WS PO SUBJECT PROPERTY EAGLE NEST 330' EAGLE NEST BUFFER v 4� rex4z- z S 0 25o goo 1000 SC?ICE 9N PEE7 SPECIES LEGEND SYMBOL ID DESCRIPTION QUANTITY GT GOPHER TORTOISE - POTENTIALLY OCCUPIED 16 AB GOPHER TORTOISE - ABANDONED 6 ® AA AMERICAN ALLIGATOR 2 LB LITTLE BLUE HERON 2 '* WS WOOD STORK 1 X WI WHITE IBIS 2 SE SNOWY EGRET 1 NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "Q. GRADY MINOR" SURVEY DATED: 8-19-13 x Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. DESIGNED: TH M P E R I A L LAKES DRAWN BY RMJ 2. Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 5 3. JOB NO.: 1342 1342 14. TV 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104.3732 LISTED SPECIES SHEET NO.: 109 OF 13 15. Email:tuna@Wmll-associafs.Com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E L- i'7KF 2� 20.0 3 12.411.8 ,11.4 10.0 o I . 11.8 1.8 .12.9 9.1 tt55 tt 14.3 16:5 I 12.6 36 14.6 SUBJECT 55 tt2.& 28 13.1 .2 PROPERTY 11 2 115.0 �3:4 16.6 11.4 15.3 14.4 16.5 16.3 10.8 10.2 1 Jpp .2 10.7 9.2 F 14.13.9 10.4 15.5 10.3 15.1 1511.9 12.9 9.6 I 14.9 14.7 15.1 92.9 gg 4 3 13.9 0.2 1i597 162�% 14.5 �5:0 14:� 14.91414 6 ! 1.2 16.0 122811.0 12.1 10.0 10.8 -v w N \` 0 2g0 goo 101 DESIGNED: TH 1, Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. M P E R I A L L A K E S DRAWN BY: RMJ 2. Marne 0 LnV�r�l)men1 Consulting CREATED: 07-31-25 3. OG E 1 C 1 JOB NO.: 1342 4. 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SHEET NO.: ,o OF 13 5. Email:lnna®tnll-assomates.e0m Phone:(239) W-0166 Fax: (239)643.6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E 50' O.C. TRANSECTS — SUBJECT PROPERTY w OVLI'. AS o 250 500 10l SCAZZ NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "Q. GRADY MINOR" SURVEY DATED: 8-19-13 DESIGNED: TH 1, Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. I M P S IR I A L L A K E S DRAWN BY: RMJ 2. Marine 0 LnV�r�en1 Consulting CREATED: 07-31-25 3. OG E 1 C 1 JOB NO.: 1342 4. P2��773584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 T RA N S E C T MAP SHEET NO.: 111 OF 13 5. _ _ Email:lnna®tnll-associates.com Phone:(239) 643.0166 Fax: (239)643.6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E Ba y c luL FcwfY 51 0 1 2 �I • Mi • Bonita L r i3tinii ELk%.bRdSY4 1�JIj $ ° ..._ ApnitS{X't�achf�d� �111-r 0 0 )TMILE BUFFER may,^�=1•V`k,II= - .c-%iniFr'_.'uL. • o j 'O O • • ° • �`° ♦ bl• lb { a eimeRc' ,t4L'esl Golf • � o • 4 ° ':ountry Glub °O`•O • • 00 O 0 0 • • 0 •• Q • O a 17 0 • ° F 4 • 0"1 • aS - 0 • O rJ u31 C me3, 0c) Co uetiv C luti C 4. 00 • <'O 0 0 _i 5tooe ° 0 p • La kv 0 Co •&0 0•0 Legend •• s • • Q PROPERTY BOUNDARY 0 e • I' • • ° 3 MILE BUFFER Im rvok BBB Ru. " • • ° • Bear Report Date (Total: 268) • 0 2023 (QTY: 37) PROPERTY BOUNDARY ° - ° 2022 (QTY: 82) - 2021 (QTY: 32) 2020 (QTY: 35) I 0 2019 (QTY: 82) Twell, Hall &Associates, Inc DRAWN BY: RMJ REVISION: SCALE: I 1 -1.13 mi CREATED: 10-14-25 N/A FILE PATH: Marine & Environmental Consulting 3484ExchangeAve.SuiteB.Naples,FL34104-3732 IMPERIAL LAKES BEAR RELATED CALL MAP JOB NO.: 1342 N/A P:\1342-Imperial Lakes\GIS\ 1342-BEARS CALLS—d SHEET: 01 OF01 N/A Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone:(239)643-0166 Fax:(239)643-6632 SECTION-15 TOWNSHIP-48S RA GE-25E APPENDIX B: LISTED SPECIES SURVEY THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SUMMARY IMPERIAL LAKES UPDATED JUNE 2025 Prepared by: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLEs, FL 34104 1.0 INTRODUCTION & SITE DESCRIPTION The Imperial Lakes project site is approximately 76.81 acres located in northern Collier County, east of Old U.S. 41 and west of Livingston Road, just south of the Lee/Collier County line. The project property is located within Sections 14 and 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The project is identified as folio number 00153160004 by the Collier County property appraiser's office. Access to the project is via a road access easement from Livingston Road to the northern property line. A general location map is provided in the included exhibits. The proposed project is located on undeveloped land, with multifamily developments and golf courses in the vicinity on all sides. The properties directly adjacent to the parcel are mostly undeveloped, with the exception of the property to the south and to the east near the southern end of the subject parcel. The property boundary encompasses approximately 76.82 acres and consists primarily of undeveloped, forested land and two lakes. The lakes were excavated for fill between 1984 and 1985. A majority of the site has been infested to varying degrees by exotic vegetation including melaleuca and Brazilian pepper. The property contains about 39.85 acres of upland habitats (52% of the project area) and 22.33 acres of wetland habitats (29% of the project area) as well as 14.64 acres of other surface waters (OSW) (19% of the project area). A Threatened and Endangered Species Survey was performed to consider potential effects of the proposed project on any state or federally listed species that may utilize the property for feeding/foraging and/or nesting. All observations to date are described in the following report. 2.0 LISTED SPECIES SURVEYS Wildlife and listed species surveys were conducted by Turrell, Hall & Associates (THA) biologists on the project lands. As used herein, the term "listed animal species" refers to those animals listed as endangered or threatened by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) or the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) as well as those animal species listed as species of special concern by the FWC. The term "listed plant species" refers to those plants listed as endangered or threatened by the FWS. Several animal species listed by FWC are also classified (listed) by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) as wetland dependent species. THA's wildlife/listed species surveys were supplemented by research concerning listed species. The following subsections document these efforts and the results of these efforts. 2.1 DATABASE RESEARCH Prior to field investigations, aerial photos, soils maps, and prior mapping for the Imperial Lakes property were reviewed to identify the various vegetation associations potentially present on and adjacent to project lands. Various publications and databases were reviewed to determine listed plant and wildlife species which could occur and those that had been previously documented on or near the project lands as well as to gather information concerning listed species (see listed references in Section 4). Based on the habitat types identified, existing knowledge of the project area, contact with agency biologists, and review of publications and databases, a preliminary list of listed plant and animal species with the potential to occur within or near the project lands was determined. 2.2 FIELD BIOTIC SURVEY METHODOLOGY Preliminary biotic and listed species surveys for the proposed project have been conducted by THA personnel in 2016, 2018, 2021, and 2025. Table 2 provides the specific dates and times of these surveys, the total number of man-hours spent surveying on a given date, and the ecologists who conducted the surveys on a given date. In excess of 60 staff hours (man-hours) have thus far been spent conducting the surveys. Surveys were conducted such that observations included time periods ranging from sunrise to sunset and across multiple years. Barring seasonal considerations, the survey dates allowed for observations during likely times of probable occurrence for the majority of the listed animal species which could occur on or immediately adjacent to the project lands. The field surveys consisted of ecologists walking relatively straight and meandering transects through the various habitats found on the project lands. Space between transects usually varied, depending on type of habitat, visibility limits, and density of vegetation. Observers were equipped with aerials, wildlife and plant identification books and notes, binoculars, field notebooks, and hand- held GPS units. Along the transects, the biologists periodically stopped, looked for wildlife and signs of wildlife, looked for listed plant species in appropriate habitats, and listened for wildlife vocalizations. The approximate location of observed listed wildlife and plant species and their numbers were mapped on aerials and recorded in field notebooks on a daily basis as were signs of listed wildlife species that were noted. In the same fashion, observed non -listed wildlife species encountered or signs of such species were recorded daily. When performing the pedestrian transects through appropriate habitats, particular consideration was given to looking for signs of gopher tortoise burrows and potential bonneted bat roosting locations. These efforts included examining all pine trees greater than 6"dbh for evidence of cavities. All dead snags were also examined for cavities that could support bonneted bat roosting. The field survey methodologies utilized on the project lands were generally consistent with those prescribed by the FWC (GFC, 1988). The following provides a discussion of how the methodologies employed deviated from the specific subcategories of wildlife survey methods recommended in the referenced FWC (formerly GFC) document. "Small Mammal Sampling" No small mammal trapping was performed. None of the species listed under this methodology could be reasonably expected to occur on the project lands due to inappropriate habitat and/or the range of the species not extending into the project area. "Gopher Tortoise Burrow Surveys" Methods used were consistent except for: (1) survey transects occupied a higher density of transects than is recommended plus covered a higher percentage of potentially suitable habitats than is recommended; (2) survey transects included habitat types not normally considered appropriate for gopher tortoises. The surveys were performed by the following THA personnel: Tim Hall Education: B.S. in Forest Resources and Conservation, M.S. in Wildlife Ecology. Experience: 26 years as an environmental consultant with emphasis on listed species surveys and management plans, environmental impact analyses and assessments, wetland delineation, environmental permitting, and various other environmental topics. Christina Hall Education: B.A. in Environmental Studies. Experience: 5 years of professional environmental consulting and ecological studies experience in Florida including performing wetland delineations, listed species/wildlife surveys, habitat mapping, tortoise relocations, and environmental permitting. Sara Packard Education: B.A. in Environmental Studies. Experience: 1 year of professional environmental consulting and ecological studies experience in Florida including performing wetland delineations, habitat mapping, and environmental permitting. 2.3 RESULTS 2.3.1 Research Results The review conducted of the various existing databases concerning documented listed species (FWC, FWS, FNAI) did not reveal records of any listed plant species documented on the project lands. Conversations with FWC personnel indicated that black bears were suspected of crossing the property for transient passage, though this use has decreased with all of the development that has occurred in the area. THA's review of these existing databases included searching records for documented listed species occurring within approximately 5,000 feet of the subject property boundary. Other listed animal species previously documented outside the project lands but within 5,000 feet of the Imperial Lakes property included little blue heron, tricolored heron, and bald eagle. There were no records of any listed plant species occurring in the query area. 2.3.2 Listed Animal Species Observed Several different animal species, including six protected species, were observed during the course of THA's wildlife/listed species surveys. Table 3 provides a listing of all the wildlife (animal) species observed on the Imperial Lakes property during the course of THA's surveys. Surveys specific to the bonneted bat resulted in no observations of roosting activities. Surveys specific to gopher tortoises resulted in location of 22 tortoise burrows from an estimated population of 12 to 14 tortoises. The following subsections briefly address the listed animal species observed on -site (i.e. within the Imperial Lakes property boundary). Snowy Egret Snowy egrets (Egretta thula) were observed several occasions foraging along the pond shorelines. No snowy egret nests or signs of nesting were observed on -site or in the adjacent areas. White This Several white ibis (Eudocimus albus) were observed on different occasions foraging within the open trails and adjacent wooded areas between the two ponds. White ibis were also observed perching in cypress trees within the southern cypress dome. No white ibis nests or signs of nesting were observed on -site or in adjacent areas. Little Blue Heron Little blue herons (Egretta caerulea) were also documented foraging along the shorelines of the two ponds. No heron nests or signs of nesting were observed on -site or in adjacent areas. Wood Stork Two wood storks (Mycteria americana) was observed within the marsh area at the center of the southern cypress dome. No wood stork nests or signs of nesting were observed on -site or in adjacent areas. Bald Eagle A bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) nest has been documented along the southeastern property line of the site. This nest (CO071) was active during the 2024/25 nesting season and is apparently acclimated to some disturbance as the adjacent high school was constructed while this nest has been in use. Gopher Tortoise Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrows were observed predominately in the scrub habitat at the northwest corner of the site. Approximately 22 burrows were located and flagged. 2.3.3 Listed Animal Species Which Have the Potential to Occur but Were Not Observed Although not observed on the project lands during the listed species surveys, additional state and/or federally listed faunal species could potentially occur on the Imperial Lakes property or on lands adjacent to the property. Based on habitats present within these areas, land uses, species observed near the project during biotic surveys, habitats present in the general area, review of various sources of information previously, and personal experience of project ecologists, assessments were made as to the probability of occurrence of other listed species on the project lands. Three species of mammals, 1 species of reptile, 1 amphibian species, and 1 species of birds were considered to have some potential for occurring on the Imperial Lakes property. These species are listed in Table 4. This table provides the state and federal designation status of each species along with a generalized rating as to the probability for each species to occur on project lands. By "occur", it is meant that the species could either utilize project lands for hunting/foraging purposes, traverse/pass through project lands, directly reside on the project lands (unlikely), or use the lands for nests, burrows, or dens as applicable to the species. The following sub -sections address the identified species. Big Cypress Fox Squirrel The Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) (BCFS) is considered a threatened species by the FWC and is classified as a wetland dependent species by SFWMD. BCFS typically reside in pine flatwoods and mixed pine and cypress forests and prefer mature forests that are open and "park -like" (e.g., have a scattered subcanopy and a ground cover not dominated by woody species or vines). BCFS can also be found in melaleuca infested forests provided some desirable habitat remains in the general area and can also forage areas containing hardwoods such as oaks and cabbage palms. The areas of pine flatwoods present on -site are thoroughly infested with exotic vegetation, predominately melaleuca. As a result, the site does not have the open mid -story that is normally favored by BCFS. The golf course immediately to the south of the project site has documented fox squirrels on the course so it is likely that BCFS could theoretically occupy some habitats around the southern project lands, and there is a very limited possibility that BCFS may occasionally forage in semi -appropriate habitats present elsewhere on the property. During the course of the listed species/wildlife surveys, no BUS individuals were observed. Day beds and chewed cones were observed on -site but were attributed to grey squirrels which were observed. Given this and the absence of suitable habitats, the potential for BUS residing on the project lands is judged to be moderate. Florida Black Bear The Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) was recently delisted from threatened status by the FWC and is classified as a wetland dependent species by SFWMD. Black bears are known to travel great distances to forage and mate. The range of habitat types used and traversed by the Florida black bear is very broad and could theoretically encompass the project lands. Personal conversations with FWC staff revealed several records within 5 miles of the project lands. During the course of THA's biotic surveys, staff did not find any Florida black bears or positive signs of this species' presence. However, black bear presence has been noted on the adjacent Conservation Collier lands to the west of this site. It is unlikely that any black bears would den on the project lands due to the relatively small size and proximity to adjacent development. Suitability of the majority of the project lands for bear foraging is low due to the melaleuca and other exotic vegetation infestation, thus it is anticipated that chances of bears using the project lands to any significant degree are limited. There is a high chance that black bears may occasionally roam through portions of the project lands considering the number of reported sightings within 5 miles of the project. Florida Bonneted Bat The Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) was listed as endangered by FWS in December 2013. There is very little information regarding the life history or distribution of the Florida bonneted bat. The majority of roosts are found in non-native habitat or artificial roosts such as bat houses. Typically, the colonies are small consisting of one male and several females. Roosting can occur in tree cavities or in artificial structures such as bat houses or buildings. Foraging typically occurs in native habitats including hardwoods, pinelands and mangrove habitats, but golf courses and neighborhoods may also be utilized. A thorough survey of the project lands was conducted to search for tree cavities or other structure that could be utilized by bonneted bats. A total of 5 cavities were located in 4 dead snags in the northern portions of the project site. These cavities were peeped with a small camera and monitor system and were determined to be unoccupied. No evidence of any bat utilization was observed on the project site. Gopher Frog Gopher frogs (Rana capito), listed as a Species of Special Concern (SSC) by the FWC, are potential commensals with gopher tortoises. Several gopher tortoises were found on the Imperial Lakes property and adjacent lands so it is possible that gopher frogs could also be present. Special care will be taken when relocating tortoises to insure that gopher frogs or other commensals are not harmed during the relocation efforts. Although gopher frogs are highly dependent upon gopher tortoise burrows for shelter, they occasionally also find refuge in other burrows (crayfish, rodent) and features such as stump holes. Such features are also present on the Imperial Lakes property, however the on - site wetlands are not highly suitable gopher frog habitats and appropriate nearby wetlands are a necessary component of the frog's life cycle. Eastern Indigo Snake The eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) is listed as threatened by FWS and FWC. Generally this species lives and hunts in a wide variety of habitats and its territory can cover large areas. They can be associated with gopher tortoise burrows (as a commensal) and favor pine flatwoods, palmetto prairies, and scrub habitats as well as wetland edges. They are relatively reclusive in nature and observations in the wild are rather rare. There would seem to be a moderate probability that one or more eastern indigo snakes may occasionally utilize any number of different habitats present in the project lands. It seems unlikely that such snakes actually reside on the Imperial Lakes property given the restricted access due to past disturbances and surrounding development. Indigo snakes could theoretically reside on the property, however chances seem remote. Southeastern American Kestrel American kestrels are represented in south Florida by two subspecies. The year-round resident, the Southeastern American kestrel (Falco sparverius paulus), is listed by FWC as threatened, while the second subspecies, the Eastern American kestrel (F. sparverius sparverius) migrates to Florida in the winter months and is not listed by the FWC. Kestrels typically forage for insects and lizards in pastures, open fields, and park -like landscapes with a relatively open midstory and canopy and short herbaceous groundcover (Stys, 1993). They typically nest in dead trees in cavities created by other avian species. The nest trees are usually in close proximity to suitable foraging areas. Listed kestrels may infrequently spend time hunting the open fairways of the golf courses to the south of the project site, though there is no appropriate foraging habitat on the site itself. Although listed kestrels may forage in such areas on occasion, it is unlikely that any reside on the property. No listed kestrels were seen on or adjacent to the property nor were signs of possible kestrel nests observed. 2.3.4 General Wildlife Observations During the biotic surveys conducted on the project lands, ecologists recorded sightings and signs of non -listed wildlife in addition to listed species. Table 3 contains all wildlife observed on the project lands. Signs of larger mammals, such as white-tailed deer, were observed in portions of the Imperial Lakes property. Other mammals actually observed on the Imperial Lakes property were armadillo, raccoon, and gray squirrels. Observations of non -listed bird species were generally widely scattered and low in number and were particularly infrequent in the interior of the site. Although several species of non -listed birds are indicated in Table 3, the actual number of individuals and number of species observed during any given period of wildlife observations was typically low. A few of the non -migratory bird species may reside on the project lands, however very few nests were observed. Observations of non -listed herps were largely restricted to the Imperial Lakes property's ponds. 2.3.5 Listed Plant Species According to the FWS, no federally listed plant species have been documented in Collier County (USFWS, 2015). No listed plant species were observed on the project lands during the course of the listed species/wildlife surveys conducted and a review of pertinent databases concerning listed plant species found no records of such plants occurring on project lands or within 5,000 feet of these lands. Considering these points, it seems highly improbable that any plant species currently listed by FWS may be present on project lands. Several butterfly orchids (Encyclia tampensis) were observed on cypress trees within the on -site cypress domes. All of the observed specimens are within the proposed preserve areas and will not be impacted by the proposed development. Any orchid specimens found within the development footprint will be relocated to within the preserve boundaries. REFERENCES Chafin, L.G. 2000. Field guide to the rare plants of Florida. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee, Florida. Deyrup, Mark and R. Franz (ed.). 1994. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume IV, invertebrates. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 1999. Florida land use, cover, and forms classification system. FDOT, Tallahassee, FL. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). 2013. Florida's endangered species, threatened species, and species of special concern - official lists. FWC, Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). 2014. Florida panther telemetry data, 2/23/1981 through 7/24/2014 — GIS database. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. FWC. 2015. Florida panther mortality data, 2/13/1972 through 12/31/2015 — GIS database. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. FWC. 2015. Florida black bear nuisance report data, 1980 through 2014 — GIS database. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). 2015. Florida's waterbird colony locator. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. Available online: http://atoll.floridamarine.org/WaterBirds/ (Accessed June, 2015) FWC. 2015. FWC eagle nest locator; data for 2000 through 20014. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. Available online: http://myfwc.com/eagle/eaglenests. (Accessed June, 2015) Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (GFC). 1988. Wildlife methodology guidelines for section 18.1) of the Application for Development Approval. GFC, Tallahassee, FL. Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI). 2014. Species and natural communities tracking list for Collier County, Florida. FNAI, Tallahassee, FL. Available online: http://www.fnai.org/trackinglist.cfm (accessed June, 2015) Gilbert, C.R. 1992. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume II, fishes. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Hipes, D., D.R. Jackson, K. NeSmith, D. Printiss, and K. Brandt. 2000. Field guide to the rare animals of Florida. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee, Florida. Humphrey, Stephen R. (ed.). 1992. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume I, Mammals. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Kautz, R., R. Kawula, T. Hoctor, J. Comiskey, D. Jansen, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti, R. McBride, L. Johnson, and K. Root. 2006. How much is enough? Landscape -scale conservation for the Florida panther. Biological Conservation 130, 118-133. Moler, Paul E. (ed.). 1992. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume IIl, amphibians and reptiles. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Multi-Species/Ecosystem Recovery Implementation Team (MERIT) for South Florida, Florida Panther Subteam. 2002. Landscape conservation strategy for the Florida panther in south Florida. USFWS, Vero Beach, FL. Rodgers, J.A, H.W. Kale, and H.T. Smith (ed.). 1996. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume V, birds. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Runde, D.E., J.A. Gore, J.A. Hovis, M.S. Robson, and P.D. Southall. 1991. The Florida atlas of breeding sites for herons and their allies. Nongame wildlife program technical report No. 10. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL. South Florida Water Management District. June, 2005. Basis of review for environmental resource permit applications within the South Florida Water Management District - Table 4.2.7-1: Listed wildlife species that are aquatic or wetland dependent and that use upland habitats for nesting or denning. SFWMD, West Palm Beach, Florida. Stys, Beth. 1993. Ecology and habitat protection needs of the Southeastern American kestrel on large- scale development sites in Florida. Nongame Wildlife Technical Report #13. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. South Florida multi -species recovery plan. USFWS, Vero Beach, FL. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Red -cockaded Woodpecker South Florida Survey Protocol. USFWS, Vero Beach, FL. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015. Federally listed and candidate species in Collier County, Florida, Vero Beach, FL. Available online: http://www.fws.gov/verobeach/ (Accessed June, 2015). Ward, Daniel B. (ed.). 1991. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume V, plants. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Appendix 1: Tables APPENDIX 1 TABLES Table 1. Existing FLUCFCS categories present on the Imperial Lakes property. FLUCFCS FLUCFCS Description Acres % of Total Code Property 322 Coastal Scrub 3.91 5.1 411 Pine Flatwoods 0.96 1.2 411E2 Pine Flatwoods (25% - 50% exotics) 15.77 20.5 411E3 Pine Flatwoods (50% - 75% exotics) 6.10 7.9 411E4 Pine Flatwoods (75% - 100% exotics) 11.50 14.9 414 Pine Mesic Oak Flatwoods 0.89 1.1 520 Lakes 14.64 19.1 621 Cypress 4.63 6.0 621E2 Cypress (25% - 50% exotics) 8.05 10.5 621E3 Cypress (50% - 75% exotics) 0.47 0.1 621E4 Cypress (75% - 100% exotics) 0.51 0.1 624E2 Cypress / Pine / Palm (50% - 75% exotics) 3.33 4.3 625 Hydric Pine Flatwood 1.31 1.7 625E2 Hydric Pine Flatwood(25% - 50% exotics) 1.60 2.1 625E4 Hydric Pine Flatwood (75% - 100% exotics) 2.30 3.0 641 Freshwater Marsh 0.84 1.1 TOTAL ACRES 76.81 Appendix 1: Tables Table 3. Wildlife species observed on or immediately adjacent to the Imperial Lakes property. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS FWC FWS SFWMD REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS American alligator Alligator mississippiensis WDS Green anole Anolis carolinensis -- -- -- Brown anole Anolis sagrei -- -- -- Southern black racer Coluber constrictor priapus -- -- -- Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus T -- -- Red rat snake Pantherophis guttatus -- -- -- BIRDS Great blue heron Ardea herodias -- -- -- Cattle egret Bubulcus ibis -- -- -- Red-shouldered hawk Buteo lineatus -- -- -- Northern cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis -- -- -- Turkey vulture Cathartes aura -- -- -- Belted kingfisher Ceryle alcyon Common killdeer Charadrius vociferus -- -- -- Ground dove Columbina passerina -- -- -- Black vulture Coragyps atratus -- -- -- Yellow-romped warbler Dendroica coronata -- -- -- Pileated woodpecker Dryocopus pileatus -- -- -- Gray catbird Dumetella carolinensis Swallow-tailed kite Elanoides forficatus -- -- -- White ibis Eudocimus albus SSC -- WDS Little blue heron E retta caerulea SSC -- WDS Snowy egret E retta thula SSC -- WDS Bald Ea le Haliaeetus leucoce halus -- -- WDS Loggerhead shrike Lanius ludovicianus -- -- -- Red-bellied woodpecker Melaner es carolinus -- -- -- Northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos -- -- -- Boat-tailed grackle Quiscalus major -- -- -- Carolina wren Thryothorus ludovicianus -- -- -- Mourning dove Zenaida macroura -- -- -- MAMMALS Feral dog (Coyote?)* Canis spp. -- -- -- Nine-banded armadillo* Dasypus novemcinctus -- -- -- White-tailed deer* Odocoileus virginianus -- -- -- Raccoon Procyon lotor -- -- -- Gray squirrel Sciurus carolinensis -- -- -- FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service SFWMD = South Florida Water Management District E = Endangered SSC = Species of Special Concern T = Threatened T (S/A) = Threatened (due to similarity of appearance to crocodile) WDS = Wetland dependent species -- = Not Listed * = Indicates species not directly observed but signs of the species (i.e. scat, tracks, etc.) were documented. Note: This table is based on species the results of listed species/wildlife surveys conducted by THA, Inc. Table 4. Animal species listed by FWS and FWC that were not observed on -site but could utilize or reside on the Imperial Lakes property, along with their relative probability of occurrence. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE FWS FWC REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS Eastern indigo snake Drymarchon corais couperi T T Moderate Gopher frog Rana capito -- SSC Very Low BIRDS Southeastern American kestrel Falco sparverius paulus -- T Moderate / Low MAMMALS Florida bonneted bat Eumops floridanus E E Very Low Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia -- T Moderate Florida black bear Ursus americanus floridanus -- -- Moderate FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service E = Endangered SSC = Species of Special Concern T = Threatened -- = Not Listed PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE = Relative probability of indicated species inhabiting or utilizing the sites as based on the following scale: Very High, High, Moderate, Low, Very Low. A rating of "none" indicates it is highly unlikely that the species may inhabit or utilize the area (no probability). APPENDIX C: INITIAL COORDINATION WITH DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES This record search is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute a project review. This search only identifies resources recorded at the Florida Master Site File and does NOT provide project approval from the Division of Historical Resources. Contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333 for project review information. March 2, 2016 Arielle Poulos Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 3584 Exchange Avenue Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 643-0166 Email: Ariellek,Turrell-Associates.com In response to your inquiry of March 2, 2016 the Florida Master Site File lists two archeological sites and no other cultural resources found at the designated parcel in Collier County, Florida Township 48S Range 25E Sections 14 & 15 as submitted with the search request When interpreting the results of our search, please consider the following information: • This search area may contain unrecorded archaeological sites, historical structures or other resources even if previously surveyed for cultural resources. • Because vandalism and looting are common at Florida sites, we ask that you limit the distribution of location information on archaeological sites. • While many of our records document historically significant resources, the documentation of a resource at the Florida Master Site File does not necessarily mean the resource is historically significant. • Federal, state and local laws require formal environmental review for most projects. This search DOES NOT constitute such a review. If your project falls under these laws, you should contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding the results of this search. Sincerely, Eman M. Vovsi Historical Data Analyst, FMSF EMVovsi@DOS.MyFlorida.com 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 • www.flheritage.com/preservation/sitefile 850.245.6440 ph 1 850.245.6439 fax I SiteFile@dos. state.fl.us 1 13 4k— All II l Il 4- -, ANINA-7 2 11 11 II II 0111<4 LLJL.11. IJ I I LAU �j II rj' ]IF Trade r 5- fir III Qk- CROO559 II CF4&,60 . .. . .... . . . . * . w - 0 • 0 ......... . .1, . ........... o db Gof C C� 10 30-1 rce: Esn 3qiQitA'G.Idbe e apping.- �erd, r I.G�I , 1-9 urse , J� a --- — ------ . ■ij�■ Golf Cou Se Nq:n. )-,Z-.aOstar eographmds, CNE&AAirbus DS­ USDA, US b At wis ,,Stapd, and the GIS User Co'[n::t' nity Florida Master Site File 'TFiTlorida AR=2 Master ss=e CM=O Site AMb RG=O File otal=2 Tota SitelD Type Site Name CR00242 AR SAND KNOLL CR00737 AR LIVINGSTON ROAD NONE <4 MILES Cultural Resource Roster Address Additional Info SHPO Eval Not Eligible Created: 3/2/2016 NR Status Page 1 of 1 E-A V C lu L } N TFY� � 0 1 2 I�I • Mi • Bonita oaaliag�.YcnRdSW ° prings c. Apnitaa,t� h"S �1-r o ° ° 3 MILE BUFFER N N �i ;asin'j _..uL. • O %• u� • O O• .. __•�'w—_I ._—Q �, .�.. --=�—ice._,_-O• -- • -—— — - — — — — —— • —• MedmeRa • ::ounvy lub • •� 4 o 00 • �0 • O° • O ` V °• • • 8 i �° o o •� o °°g,. ,a o • riu=Nlceea3, ;i ,. O®46 ou CI • Co uti Cl _. i! r'4.. n L ° •1% • Legend • • _ • 00 e • • 00 Q PROPERTY BOUNDARY • ' 1. 3 MILE BUFFER , ui .•iP it -- _ ._.. im rvok Ifte Mu. • • O • '�; Bear Report Date (Total: 268) • 2023 (QTY: 37) PROPERTY BOUNDARY O - c _ ti 17° 2022 (QTY: 82) v'. t - 2021 (QTY: 32) 2020 (QTY: 35) I ' • 2019 (QTY: 82) lwrell, Hall &Associates, Inc DRAWN BY: RMJ REVISION: SCALE: 1 1-1.13— CREATED: 10-14-25 N/A FILE PATH: Marine & Environmental Consulting 3484ExchangeAve.SuiteB.Naples,FL34104-3732 IMPERIAL LAKES BEAR RELATED CALL MAP JOB NO.: 1342 N/A R\,342-m,p�n.l Lak.\GIS\ 1342-BEARS CAias.—d SHEET: 01 OF01 N/A Email: llma@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION- 15 TOWNSHIP-48 S RANGE-25 E J MB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT Imperial Lakes RPUD Amendment (Veterans Memorial Boulevard, Collier County, Florida) October 12, 2025 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = ,$500.00 TIS (Major Study) Review Fee = $1,500.00 Prepared by: v MB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 471 1 7Tw AvENuE SW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 1 9 (239) 227-2355 CERTIFICATE of AUTHORIZATION NO. 278313 (PROJECT No. 1 701 1 1) TABLE OF CONTENTS Summation and Conclusions 2 Methodology S Scope of Project 6 Table A - Proposed Development Scenarios 6 Figure i - Project Location & Roadway Classification 6.1 Master Concept Plan 6.2 Project Generated Traffic 7 Table B - Net New Trips Generated 7 Table 1A - Trip Generation Computations 7.1 Table 113 - Trip Generation Computations 7.2 Existing + Committed Road Network 8 Project Generated Traffic Distribution 8 Area of Significant Impact 8 Figure 2 - Project Traffic Distribution 8.1 Table 2 - Area of Impact/Road Classification 8.2 2024 thru 2029 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions 9 Table 3 - 2024 & 2029 Link Volumes 9.1 Table 4 - 2029 Link Volumes/Capacity Analysis 9.2 1 Summation and Conclusions Imperial Lakes RPUD is an existing PUD that was approved and vested for the development of 430 multi -family dwelling units and having a vested trip cap of 205 new PM peak hour two-way trips. The vested 430 multi -family dwelling units are equivalent to 216 single-family dwelling units that would also have a trip cap of 205 PM trips. It is proposed to amend the Imperial Lakes RPUD which would allow for two (2) potential development scenarios for the subject property as described below. A. Development Pursuant to Growth Management Plan (GMT) - The property could be developed with 313 single-family and/or multi -family dwelling units and would have a trip cap of 290 new PM peak hour two-way trips- B. Vested Development Rights - 430 multi -family dwelling units having a vested trip cap of 205 new PM peak hour two-way trips. The vested 430 multi -family units are equivalent to 216 single-family dwelling units that would also have a trip cap of 205 PM trips. Based upon the findings of this report, it was determined that the two development alternatives for Imperial Lakes RPUD will not significantly or negatively impact the surrounding road network or cause any roadways to operate below their adopted level of service standard. It is noted that per Collier County's 2024 AUIR, the current traffic demand on the segment of U.S. 41 (between Immokalee Road and Wiggins Pass Road) and Old 41 (north of U.S. 41) exceeds the adopted level of service capacity. These roadway links are not within the project's area of impact and are not significantly or negatively impacted by the project's net new trips_ The project's vested trips (i.e., 205 two-way PM peak hour trips) are, by vested rights, included in the 2024 background traffic and the net new trips will not significantly or negatively impact these roadways. Those specific roadway links currently operate at a level of service that exceed their respective adopted LOS standards, regardless of the development of Imperial Lakes PUD. All other roadways, within the project's area of influence, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the net new traffic generated by the maximum development intensity of 313 single-family units or as vested up to 430 multifamily units having a vested trip cap of 205 new PM peak hour two-way trips. The vested 430 multi- family dwelling units are equivalent to 216 single-family dwelling units that would also have a trip cap of 205 PM trips. Although the project does not adversely impact any roads or cause any roads to operate below the adopted LOS standard, the Developer will be required to pay for its portion of "consumed" capacity via payment of road impact fees. As set forth by Collier County's Impact Fee Ordinance, the fees are a pro rata assessment towards the funding of area - wide transportation improvements to support new growth. The amount of road impact fees paid per type of land use are determined via a "consumption -based impact fee approach", in which new development is charged based upon the proportion ofvehicle- 2 miles of travel (VMT) that each unit of new development is expected to consume of a lane mile of roadway network. The cost of consumed lane mule is based upon current roadway construction costs within Collier County. Therefore, the payment of road impact fees is the projects pro rata share of funding transportation improvements that are deemed necessary to support the demands generated by new growth. Northwest Traffic Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) The proposed residential project is located within the Northwest Traffic Concurrency Management Area (NW-TCMA) and is subject to Collier County's Growth Management Plan. The following summarizes the GMP conditions and the project's compliance status. Policy 5.6 In order to be exempt from link -specific concurrency, developments within the TCMA must provide documentation to the Transportation Planning Section that at least two (2) Transportation Demand Management (TD* strategies utilized meet the criteria of the LDC. Monitoring of the use and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the required annual monitoring report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report shall, for three (3) years following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the use and effectiveness of the selected strategies in a, forma provided by the County. Modifications to the applied TDM strategies may be made within the first three (3) years of'development if they are deemed ineffective. Modifications to the new TDMstrategies may be made within this second three-year period and subsequent three-year periods if the TDM strategies are deemed ineffective. Another assessment shall be completed within three (3) years and in three- year increments until the TDMstrategies are deemed effective. Project Status -- Satisfied The net new nonvested trips associated with the most -intense development scenario (i.e., 313 single-family units) as proposed by the PUD amendment will not directly access a road or significantly impact a road that currently operates below its adopted level of service. Therefore, the project is not requested to be exempt from link -specific concurrency. Policy 5.7 Each TCMA shall maintain 85% of its lane miles at or above the LOS standards described in Policies .1.5.A and I.5.B of the Capital Improvement Element. If any Tragic Impact Statement (TIS)for a proposed development indicates that fewer than 85% of the large miler in a TCMA are achieving the LOS standards indicated alcove, the proposed development shall not be permitted where such condition occurs awnless modification of the development is made sufficient to maintain the LOSS' standard for the TCMA, or the facilities required to maintain the TCMA LDS standard are committed utilizing the standards for committed improvements in Policy 5.3 of the Capital Improvement Element of the Plan. 3 Project Status - Satisfied The Northwest TCMA has 85% of its north/south and east/west lane miles operating at or above the LOS standards described in Policies 1.5.A. and 1.5.B. of the GMP, and therefore, no further action is required to address this policy. Policy 5.8. Should the TIS far a proposed development reflect that it will impact either a constrained roadway lank andlor a deficient roadway link within a TCMA as determined in the most current Annual Update and Inventory Report (A UIR), by more than a de minimis amount (more than I % of the maximum service volume at the adopted LOS), yet continue to maintain the established percentage of lanes miles indicated in Policy 5.7 of this Element, a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment shall be required as follows: (YI)(IX)a. Congestion mitigation payments shall be calculated using the formula established in Section 163.3180(5)(h), Florida Statutes. The facility cast for a constrained roadway link shall be established using a typical lane mile cost, as determined by the Collier County Transportation Administrator, of adding Ianes to a similar arealfacility type as the constrained facility. (VI)b. Congestion mitigation payments shall be utilized by Collier County to add trip capacity within the impacted TCMA, road segments) andlor to enhance mass transit or other non -automotive transportation alternatives, which adds trip capacity within the impact fee district or adjoining impact fee district_ (VI)c. Congestion mitigation payments under this Policy shall be determined subsequent to a finding of concurrency for a proposed project within a TCMA and shall not influence the concurrency determination process. (W)(IA)d. No impact will be de minimis if it exceeds the adopted LOS standard of any affected designated hurricane evacuation routes within a TCMA. Hurricane routes in Collier County are shown on Map TR-7. Any impact to a hurricane evacuation route within a TCMA shall require a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment provided the remaining LOS requirements of the TCMA are maintained. Project Status — Satisfied The net new nonvested trips associated with the most -intense development scenario (i.e., 313 single-family units) as proposed by the PUD amendment will not directly access a road or significantly impact a road that currently operates below its adopted level of service. Furthermore, any road that currently or will operate below its adopted level of service, it was determined that the project has a de minimis impact on that road, except for Old 41 which the project's impact is less than 2.%. 4 Methodology On June 20, 2025, a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Methodology Report was submitted to the office of Collier County Transportation Planning Department. The $500.00 methodology meeting fee will be paid at the time of submitting the zoning application. Revisions to the TIS subse uent to Methodology Approval I. The TIS reflects the funded extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard from its western terminus to U.S. 41, per Collier County's 5-year CIP. 2. The distribution of trips were revised based upon the extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard. 3. The maximum development intensity will be limited to 313 single-family units. 4. Based upon the new and reduced maximum development intensity having a .net new trips of 85 vph during the PM peak hour, the project is now considered a "minor" TIS vs. a major study. 5 Scope of Project It is proposed to amend the Imperial Lakes RPUD which would allow for two (2) potential development scenarios for the subject property as described below. 5. Development Pursuant to Growth Management Plan (GMP) - The property could be developed with 313 single-family and/or multi -family dwelling units and would have a trip cap of 290 new PM peak hour two-way trips. 6. Vested Development Rights - 430 multi -family dwelling units having a vested trip cap of 205 new PM peak hour two-way trips. The vested 430 multi -family units are equivalent to 216 single-family dwelling units that would also have a trip cap of 205 PM trips. The site is located on the south side of the future Veterans Memorial Boulevard West extension and approximately 1.3 miles west of Livingston Road, within Collier County, Florida. Access to the site will be created by the funded extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard (VMB) from its west terminus to the project site and to intersect U.S. 41 as funded per Collier County's 5-year CIP. Table A Proposed Development Scenarios Development Scenario Proposed Land Use Maximum Number of Dwelling Units Trips Cap Per Dev. Scenario Development Scenario A Single -Family 290 Trips (Development Per GMP) and/or 313 d.u.'s 183 enterll07 exit Multi -Family (Refer to Table I R) Development Scenario B1 205 Trips {Vested Development) Multi -Family 430 d.u.'s 129 enter176 exit (Refer to Table 1 C) Note 1 Vested Development Rights - 430 multi -family dwelling units having a vested trip cap of 205 new PM peak hour two-way trips. The vested 430 multi -family units are equivalent to 216 single-family dwelling units that would also have a trip cap of 205 PM trips. 0 Pennsylvan'so Ave --Bonito Seach Rd — ! I Dean 5t ' a`ao a I I w � c w a a x 0 ' #I U 7 e 9 m _ EI 0 0 I a+ C IP C J 1 --- -----1-------- Veterans Mem. Blvd 1 Learning Lone Raving Way IEntrodo Ave 1-F I � I I � � m x c y � I � y � I 0 0 1 Immokolae Rd 0 LEGEND FUNDED 4-LANE ARTERIAL 6-LANE ARTERIAL • 4-LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR — — — 2-LANE ARTERIAL 2-LANE COUECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD — MTRANSPORTATI❑N ENGINEI=RINm. INC. Imperial Lakes RPUD I N m i NORTH N.r.s. u� n' Lakes Blvd 4mmokolee Rd a a o .a a � rn m C I � Q � Project Location & Roadway Classification FIGURE 'I a 5U ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY 1N FEE SIMPLE i N 60' ROADWAY EASEMENT OR 238 PG 913 AND OR 242 PG 251 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 2[1a { V ZONE: I SCALE. 1" = 400' UNDEVELOPED ---FC.]TIIRP3II TFR�,l�.gMPMOPIAT- .-naLTUVAJnA so�01t 90 _-4ss ------_-===f ==w _ - - - - - �l AA , ZONED: A CONSERVATION COLLIER 6 WIDE PRESERVE j - - , RESERVATION BUFFER -- I5WIDE TYPES' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 6 WIDE I rrr rrrrr f RESERVATION PROJECT 1 ' �� BUFFER BOUNDARY ZONED A f - HIGH SCHOOL 15' WIDE TYPE �' rr rr R ' ►��c3o: L BUFFERPE rrr l I 1 IS WIDE TYPE'B' ZONED: A . ' . " - - \ _ t —LANDSCAPE BUFFER CONSE11VATTON COLLIER PRESERVE j[ TRACT"B'I R CASTLEWOOD AT IMPERIAL PUD PB39 PG 81-82 II RESIDENTLA . _ NO BUFFER RE_UIRED R � LEGEND �— ---- E?aSTING 15' EXISTING 69 EXISTING 50' ® DEVIATION DRAINAGE EASEMENT DRAINAGE EASF8viTNT R RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY 23 EASEMENT 913 OR 1864 PG 451459 PS 39, PG 81-82 DR 238 PG 913 AA AMENITY AREA L LAKE ZONED- GC P PRESERVE IMPERIAL GOLF CLUB �ti P&{��'i�1110C' a. cMva 1111i MHIia up ON cl,e IMPERIAL LAKES RPUD .41tw Y13 la 1 - RPS IMww-mmm lwcfmpnnv P&A. $pA.rL Pluada 3 r I S I mw EXHIBIT C 11 v111inglnlx;rs L�n1w sufvcYars I�1anRCIy [,al:dsrape nl,�Ilcects REVISED w.—sl oun�ISI cu�wnula.wawa�n, pwm...I.e xemme.R MASTER PiAisi 09/29/2025 - - D- ;prra": 299.947.11.14 kv w Ir, rragrnfan at. vnm Irun Nbcm; 239.If96.93BO YOHM 1 OF 2 61 Project Generated Traffic Traffic that can be expected to be generated by the project was estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, I I'h Edition. That is, historical traffic data collected at similar land uses was relied upon in estimating the project's traffic. It was concluded that land use codes Single -Family (LUC 210) and Multi -Family (LUC 220) were most appropriate in estimating the project traffic of the most intense land uses. Note, the project's traffic impact assessment is based upon the most -intense development scenario (i.e., Development Scenario A), which will generate a total net new nonvested (i.e., more than vested) trips of 85 PM peak hour trips. This study assesses the project's impact based upon the net new trips generated. Table l A and 1 B provide a detail of the estimated total trips for the two development scenarios. Table B provides a summary of the results. Table B Proposed Development Scenarios and Maximum Trips Cap Net PM Pk Hour Max Number Trips Cap Trips Increase Development Scenario Proposed of Dwelling Per vs. Land Use Units Dev. Scenario Vested Scenario C Trips Development Scenario A Single -Family 290 Trips (+} 85 Trips (Development Per GMP) and/or 313 d.u.'s 183 enter/107 exit (+) 54 enterl31 exit Multi -Family (Refer to Table IA) Development Scenario Bx 205 Trips (Vested Development) Multi -Family 430 d.u.'s 129 enter/76 exit None (Refer to Table 1 B) Note 2 Vested Development Rights - 430 multi -family dwelling units having a vested trip cap of 205 new PM peak hour two-way trips. The vested 430 multi -family units are equivalent to 216 single-family dwelling units that would also have a trip cap of 205 PM trips. The report concludes that the project will generate more than 50 net new nonvested trip ends during the weekday highest peak hour_ As such, the report investigates the traffic impacts associated with the project based upon the criteria set forth by the Collier County Government's Traffic Impact Statement Guidelines for developments generating "more than 50 trips", which is defined as a minor study. Note, the project's traffic impact assessment is based upon the most -intense development scenario (i.e., Development Scenario A), which will generate a total net new (i.e., more than vested) trips of 85 PM 7 TABLE 1A TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Imperial Lakes RP❑ Development by Right Land Use Cade Land Use Description Build Schedule 210 Single -Family Detached Housing 313 Units Cade Trip Period Trip Generation Equation LUC 210 Daily Traffic (ADT) = Ln(T) = 0.92Ln(X)+2.68 = AM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.91Ln(X)+0.12 = 26% Enter/ 74% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.94Ln(X)+0.27 = 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 2,883 ADT 210 Kph 55 / 156 vph 290 Kph 183 / 107 vph 7.1 TABLE 1B TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Imperial Lakes RPD Vested Development Rights Land UsQ Code Land Use Description 220 Multi -Family (Low Rise) Build Schedule 430 Units Land Use Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips Trips EnterzExit LUC 220 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T = 6.41(X) + 75.31= 2,832 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.31(X) + 22.85 = 156 vph 37 / 119 vph 24% Enter/ 76% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.43(X) + 20.55 = 205 vph 129 / 76 vph 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = Equivalent to the Vested Development Rights Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 210 Single -Family Detached Housing 216 Units Land Use Code Trip Period LUC 210 Daily Traffic (ADT) _ AM Peak Hour (vph) _ PM Peak Hour (vph) _ Trio Generation Equation Ln(T) = 0.92Ln(X)+2.68 = Ln(T) = 0.91Ln(X)+0.12 = 26% Enter/ 74% Exit = Ln(T) _ ❑.94Ln(X)+0.27 = 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 2,049 ADT 150 vph 39 1 111 vph 205 vph 129 f 76 vph peak hour trips. This study assesses the project's impact based upon the net new trips generated. Existing + Committed Road Network Table 2 provides a detail of the surrounding E + C road network and their respective minimum level of service performance standards and capacity. Access to the site will be created by extending Veterans Memorial Boulevard from its west terminus to the project site and extended to intersect Old 41 and U.S. 41 which will provide the project with an alternate means of ingress/egress from the west. Veterans Memorial Boulevard (west of Livingston Road) functions as a four -lane divided arterial that is approximately 1.5 miles in length and extends to the east and west at its intersection with Livingston Road. As funded per Collier County"s 5-year CIP, Veterans Memorial Boulevard (VMB) will be extended from its west terminus to intersect U.S. 41. The 2027 estimated and vested traffic for Veterans Memorial Boulevard (900 vphpd on Table 3) was based upon the assumption that the newly created parallel facility to Immokalee Road might have a demand of about 1 /3 that of the averaged demand along the same segments of lmmokalee Road. In this case, the averaged demand is slightly less than 900 but the results were rounded up to 900 vphpd. Livingston Road is classified as a six -lane divided arterial. The road functions as a primary north/south corridor that extends from its southern terminus at its intersection with Radio Road to the Collier/Lee County boundary where it continues north/south and is known as Imperial Parkway. Within proximity of the site, the posted speed limit of Livingston Road is 45 MPH. Livingston Road & Veterans Memorial Boulevard is a four-way signalized intersection. Project Generated Traffic Distribution The project's net new traffic was distributed to the surrounding road network based upon logical means of ingress/egress, current and future traffic patterns in the area and business opportunities, as well as growth trends for the surrounding areas. Figure 2 provides a detail of the traffic distributions based on a percentage basis and Table 2 depicts the expected net new AM and PM traffic assignments for peak hour peak direction and non - peak direction. Area of Significant Impact The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2%, 2% and 3% criteria (i.e., if the project's traffic is 2% or more of a roadway's adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Table 2 describes the project traffic distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. Roads that were identified as being within the project's area of impact are shown in ['able 2- 8 Pennsylvania Ave 1 �! Bonita Beach Rd Tamarind Cay Ln , I o-J 1 a. o �❑1 rl_ 1 45% Way i I Y 61 mI n Y C Dean L p i F i U C a a: f C yam.. N �I �I tv i — 55%— ra Vetens Mem. Blvd i Learning Lane , Ravinp Woy Entrada Ave I i a 4 I d I a 0 Immokaiee Rd 0 T—— LEGEND 1 5t L i � c i La a o O�- PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT %WTRAN^aPORTATICN ENGINEERINI;, INC. I T, L m m NORTH N.T.S. f f u� r. f r Lakes Blvd H i f IN U ! H i r T_rn_■..___�_ krnokalee Rd i o a Of f \ a- to3 Imperial Lakes RPUD Project -Generated FIGURE Z September 29, 2025 Traffic Distribution TABLE 2 PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = 54 Entering NET NEW NONVE5TED TRIPS Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) = 31 Exiting NET NEW NONVESTED TRIPS LOtiS Service Project Project PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project Roar! Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Nan-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significant Class LO5 v{ php) % Dist. V( phod) a Qir (vph) DiR Standard Imlact Impaat Veterans Memorial Blvd NW-TCMA N/A U.S. 41 to Site 4D ❑ 2000 45% 24 E 14 W 2% 1.20% No NW-TCMA NIA Site to Livingston Road 4D ❑ 2000 55% 30 W 17 E 2% 1.50% No Airport Pulling Rd NW-TCMA 4 1.0 Immokalee to Vanderbilt 4D ❑ 2200 15% 8 N 5 S 3% 0.36% No N Immokalee Road NW-TCMA 41.2 G o od lette-F ra n k to Airport 6D E 3100 5% 3 E 2 W 3% 0.10% No NW-TCMA 42.1 Airport Road to Livingston Rd 6D E 3100 15% 8 E 5 W 3% 0.26% No NWTCMA 42.2 Livingston Rd to 1.75 61D/813 E 3500 10% 5 W 3 E 3% 0.14% No Livingston Road NW-TCMA 51.a Imperial St to Veterans Memorial 6141D ❑ 3000 20% 11 S 6 N 2% 0.37% No NWTCMA 51.b Veterans Memorial to Immokalee R( 6140 D 3000 35% 19 N 11 S 2% 0.63% No NW-TCMA 52.0 Immokalee Rd to Vanderbilt 6D E 3100 10% 5 N 3 S 3% 0.16% No Old 41 NW-TCMA E2.a Lee/Collier Line to VMB Ext 2U D 1000 5% 3 S 2 N 2% 0.30% No NW-TCMA 62.ti VIM Ext to U.S. 41 21J D 1000 25% 14 N 8 S 2% 1,40% No Tamiami Trail North NW-TCMA 98.0 N. of Wiggins Pass 6D E 3100 25% 14 N 8 8 2% 0.45% No roadways. Roads that were identified as being within the project's area of impact are shown in Table 2. 2024 thru 2029 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions In order to establish 2024 thru 2029 project build -out traffic conditions, two forecasting methods were used. The first traffic forecasting method was the County's traffic count data was adjusted for peak season conditions, peak hour conditions, peak direction, and an annual growth rate was then applied. The peak season/peak hour/peak direction factor and annual growth rate were derived from the 2024 Collier County AUIR Report. Using the annual growth rate, the 2029 background traffic conditions were determined, which are depicted in Table 3- The second traffic forecasting method was to add the vested trips (trip bank) identified in the 2024 AUIR report to the adjusted peak season, peak hour and peak direction traffic counts. The 2029 vested trips "V' background traffic volumes are depicted in Table 3. The greater of the two values produced by the two forecasting procedures was then considered to reflect the 2029 background traffic. The net new nonvested project generated traffic was then added to the background traffic. Table 4 provides a summary of the 2024 thra 2029 traffic conditions and the roadways' level of service and remaining available capacity. As shown, all project impacted roadways will continue to operate at the County's adopted minimum level of service thresholds at project build -out. Based upon the findings of this report, it was determined that the two development alternatives for Imperial Lakes RPUD will not significantly or negatively impact the surrounding road network or cause any roadways to operate below their adopted level of service standard. It is noted that per Collier County's 2024 AUIR, the current traffic demand on the segment of U.S. 41 (between Immokalee Road and Wiggins Pass Road) and Old 41 (north of U.S. 41) exceeds the adopted level of service capacity_ These roadway links are not within the project's area of impact and are not significantly or negatively impacted by the project's net new trips. The project's vested trips (i.e., 205 two-way PM peak hour trips) are, by vested rights, included in the background traffic and the net new trips will not significantly or negatively impact these roadways. Those specific roadway links currently operate at a level of service that exceed their respective adopted LDS standards, regardless of the development of Imperial Lakes PUD. All other roadways, within the projects area of influence, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the net new traffic generated by the maximum development intensity of 313 single-family units or as vested up to 430 multi -family units having a vested trip cap of 205 new PM peak hour two-way trips. The vested 430 multi- family dwelling units are equivalent to 216 single-family dwelling units that would also have a trip cap of 205 PM trips. 0 TABLE 3 2024 & 2029 ROADWAY LINT{ VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Meths Per Growth Rate Method 2029 2027 2029 Peak Hour 2024 Estimated Growth Peak Hour PIS Direction AUIR & Vested AUIR Rate PIC Direction Trip Background Traffic Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips (Vphpol (vohod] DiR AUIR Ivnhodl { phpol (vohod) Veterans Memorial Blvd NW-TCMA NIA U.S. 41 to Site See Note 1 900 E 2.00% 936 936 NW-TCMA N/A Site to Livingston Road See Note 1 900 W 2.00% 936 936 Livingston Road NW-TCMA 51.a imperial St to Veterans Memorial 1570 N 2.61 % 1786 37 1607 NW-TCMA 51.b Veterans Memorial to Immokalee Rd 1570 N 2.61 % 1786 37 1607 NW-TCMA 52.0 Immokalee Rd to Vanderbilt 2100 N 2 00% 2319 0 2100 Immokalee Road NW-TCMA 41.2 G o od I ette- Fra n k to Airport 2620 E 2.15% 2914 27 2647 NW-TCMA 42.1 Airport Road to Livingston Rd 2930 E 2.00% 3235 3 2933 NW-TCMA 42.2 Livingston Rd to 1-75 3140 E 2.00°/a 3467 56 3196 Old 41 NW-TCMA 62.a LeelCollier Line to VMB Ext 1130 N 2.00% 1248 0 1130 NW-TCMA 62.b VMB Ext to U.S. 41 1130 N 2.00°/6 1248 0 1130 Note 1 The 2027 estimated and vested traffic for Veterans (900 vphpd) was based upon the assumption that the newly created parallel facility to Immokalee Road might have a demand of about 1/3 that of the averaged demand along the same segments of Immokalee Road. In this case, the averaged demand is slightly less than 900 but rounded up to 900. Veterans Memorial Blvd NW-TCMA NIA U.S. 41 to Site NW-TCMA NIA Site to Livingston Road Livingston Road NW-TCMA 51.a Imperial St to Veterans Men NW-TCMA fi1.b Veterans Memorial to Immo NW-TCMA 52.0 immokalee Rd to Vanderbilt TABLE 4 2029 ROADWAY LINT{ VOLUMEXAPACITY ANALYSIS 2029 2029 2029 2029 2029 2024 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build -Cut Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak How Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hour Project PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dh Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Direction Significant phpd, LOS (vphpol Dir LOS [Vphi)d) Dir (vvh) fir (phpd) (phpd) We Ratio LOS Impact 900 E 936 E B 24 E 14 W 961 2000 0.48 B No 900 W 936 W B 30 W 17 E 966 2000 0.48 B NO 1570 C 1786 N C 11 S 6 N 1792 3000 0.50 C No 1570 C 1786 N C 19 N 11 S 1805 3000 0.60 C No 2100 C 2319 N C 5 N 3 S 2324 3100 0.75 C No Co Ier COU14ty Growth Management Community Development Department Need Help? GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides L. WAIVER APPLICATION FROM REQUIRED HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT LDC Subsection 2.03.07 E 2.j. SUBMITTAL DATE: ASSIGNED PLANNER: PETITION NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH WAIVER: PL20250006588 PROJECT NAME: Imperial Lakes RPUD LOCATION: (Common Description) The PUD is located northeast of the Krehling concrete plant, north of the Imperial Golf Club and west of Castlewood at Imperial PUD. SUMMARY OF WAIVER REQUEST: See attached (Properties located within an area of Historical and Archaeological Probability but with a low potential for historical/archaeological sites may petition the Growth Management Community Development to waive the requirement for a Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment. Once the waiver application has been submitted, it shall be reviewed and acted upon within five (5) working days. The waiver request shall adequately demonstrate that the area has low potential for historical/archaeological sites.) Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 1 of 5 Planning and Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.coiliercountVfl.gov/ APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): N .A. Realty Trust, Inc Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 8156 Fiddler's Creek Pkwy City. Naples Telephone: 239.732.9400 Cell: E-Mail Address: parisij@gulfbay.com Name of Agent: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Firm: Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC State: FL ZIP: 34114 / Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. / Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Address: 3800 Via Del Rey City: Bonita Springs Telephone: 239.947.1144 Cell: E-Mail Address: warnold@gradyminor.com / ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com State: FL ZIP: 34134 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Property I.D. Number 00153160004 Section/Township/Range: 15 / 48 125 Subdivision: N•A• Block: N.A- Lot: N.A. Plat Book N.A. Page # N.A. Metes & Bounds Description. See attached Summary of Waiver Request If the applicant includes multiple contiguous parcels, the legal description may describe the perimeter boundary of the total area, and need not describe each individual parcel, except where different zoning requests are made on individual parcels. A boundary sketch is also required. Collier County has the right to reject any legal description, which is not sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property, and may require a certified survey or boundary sketch to be submitted. Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 2 of 5 PROPERTY INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS Size of Property: 1 268+/ft. x 2634+/- ft. Total Sq. ft. 3345408+/- Acres 78.28 Width Along Roadway: 1 ,268+/- feet Depth: 2, 634+/- feet Present Zoning Classification: Imperial Lakes RPUD Present Use of Property: Undeveloped REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with narrative statement detailing the reason for the waiver request Completed application with required attachments (download latest version) Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized Property Ownership Disclosure Form Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. Any other conditions in previously approved development order(s). ❑ ❑ Other: Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 3 of 5 WAIVER CRITERIA Note: This provision is to cover instances in which it is obvious that any archaeological or historic resource that may have existed has been destroyed. Examples would be evidence that a major building has been constructed on the site or that an area has been excavated. A. Waiver Request Justification. I . Interpretation of Aerial Photograph shows property is undeveloped 2. Historical Land Use Description: undeveloped 3. Land, cover, formation and vegetation description: The site contains vegetation and water retention areas. 4. Other: B. The County Manager or designee may deny a waiver, grant the waiver, or grant the waiver with conditions. He shall be authorized to require examination of the site by an accredited archaeologist where deemed appropriate. The applicant shall bear the cost of such evaluation by an independent accredited archaeologist. The decision of the County Manager or designee regarding the waiver request shall be provided to the applicant in writing. In the event of a denial of the waiver request, written notice shall be provided stating the reasons for such denial. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the County Manager or designee regarding a waiver request may appeal to the Preservation Board. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the Preservation Board regarding a waiver request may appeal that decision to the Board of County Commissioners. Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 4 of 5 CERTIFICATION A. The applicant shall be responsible for the accuracy and completeness of this application. Any time delays or additional expenses necessitated due to the submittal of inaccurate or incomplete information shall be the responsibility of the applicant. B. All information submitted with the application becomes a part of the public record and shall be a permanent part of the file. C. All attachments and exhibits submitted shall be of a size that will fit or conveniently fold to fit into a legal size (8 1/2" x 14") folder. Signature of Applicant or Agent D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Printed Name of Applicant or Agent TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION - NOTICE OF DECISION ::1 The County Manager or designee has made the following determination: ❑ Approved on: an ❑ Approved with Conditions on: By: (see attached) ❑ Denied on: (see attached) Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 5 of 5 Imperial Lakes RPUD (PL20250006588) Summary of Waiver Request The Imperial Lakes RPUD property is approximately 78.28± acres, which is undeveloped. The Archaeological Probability Map #1 shows the project is located east of known areas of Historical/Archaeological probability and south of an archaeological site (CR737). The small portion of the northwestern corner may be located within an area of Historical/Archaeological probability. The project is located in Section 15, Township 48 S, Range 25 E. trom hnvironmental KeDort: 2.7 HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Florida Master Site File (MSF) is a database of the known historic and archaeological sites in the state of Florida. The MSF office was contacted and the response back indicated that there were two recorded archaeological sites in close proximity to the subject property. One of these sites (CR00737) is located right on the northern border of the site. According to the State Historic Preseivation Office (SHPO) evaluation, this site was not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The second site (CR00242) is located approximately 3/4 of a mile west of the project site and will not be affected at all by the proposed project. If a suspected archaeological or historical artifact is discovered during the course of site development activities (construction, clearing, etc.), the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the fund and determine the proper course of action. July 11, zozs GradyMinor Summary of Waiver Request. docx Page 1 of 3 a PApm-oawsoN company Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com Historical/Archeological Map #1: July 11, 2025 Summary of Waiver Request. docx Page 2 of 3 Legal Description: THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHEAST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY OVER AND UNDER THE SOUTH THIRTY FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 10, AND ALSO ON, OVER AND UNDER THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH THIRTY FEET OF SAID SECTION 15 EXTENDING FROM THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) TO THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF SECTION 15 LESS ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND ALSO ON, OVER, AND UNDER A STRIP OF LAND SIXTY FEET IN WIDTH LYING THIRTY FEET ON EACH SIDE OF A LINE COMMON TO THE NORTH ONE-HALF AND THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF THAT PORTION OF SAID SECTION 15 LYING EAST OF U.S. HIGHWAY 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) RIGHT-OF-WAY EXCEPT THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, ALL LYING AND BEING IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONSISTING OF 78.28 ACRES MORE OR LESS. July 11, 2025 Summary of Waiver Request. docx Page 3 of 3 Strict Schoo/ 4 � TV � o � jollier ou- Collier County School District School Impact Analysis Application Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for each new residential project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management Department at 239-377-0267. Please check [v] type of application request (one only): OSchool Capacity Review Exemption Letter F-�Concurrency Determination [] Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, Project Name: Imperial Lakes PUD Project Information: Municipality: Collier County Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): 00153160004 Location/Address of subject property: North of Imperial Golf Club, west of Castlewood at imperial PU❑ Closest Major Intersection: U.S- 41 and Old 41 Road Owner/Contract Purchaser Name(s) Agent/Contact Person: n- Wayne Arnold, II. Ownership/Agent Information: N.H. Realty Trust, Ina. (Attach location map) (Please note that if agent or contact information is completed the District will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: 0. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Telephone#: 2 39-94 7-1144 Fax: Email warnoId@gradyminor.com I hereby certify the statements and/or information contained in this application with any attachments submitted herewith are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Owner or Authorized Agent Signature III. Development Information July 7, 2025 Date Project Data Unit Types defined on page 2 of application) Current Land Use Designation: Undeveloped Proposed Land Use Designation: Residential Current zoning: Imperial Lakes PUD Proposed Zoning: Imperial Lakes PUD Project Acreage: Unit Type: SF MF MH C G Total Units Currently Allowed by Type: 0 430 Total Units Proposed by Type: 313 430 Is this a phasedproject: Yes or No If yes, please complete page 2 of this application. Date/time stamp: Worksheet is required to be completed by the Applicant only if the project is to be phased: Unit Type Yrl Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yrb YO Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ Years SF MF MH C G Totals bv Yr Grand Total Insert totals by unit type by years. Unit Types: SF = Single Family MF = Multi-Family/Apartments MH = Mobile Homes C = Condo/Co-Op G = Government EXAMPLE: Unit Yrl Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yrb Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 YrI O Yr 1 1-20 20+ Years _Type SF 25 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- MF 50 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- MH NIA C NIA G NIA Totals by Yr 75 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Grand Total Grand Total I I50 2 Types of Reviews: School Impact Analysis: This review should be divided into two categories: - School Capacity Review (land use and rezonings), and; - Concurrency ❑eterminations (site plans and subdivisions). School Capacity Review is the review of a project in the land use and rezoning stage of development. It is a review of the impact of the development on school capacity and is considered long range planning. This may be a review resulting in mitigation being required. In situations where the applicant may be required to mitigate, capacity may be reserved dependent on the type of mitigation. Concurrency Determination is the review of residential site plans and subdivisions to determine whether there is available capacity. When capacity is determined to be available a School Capacity Determination Letter (SCADL) will be issued verifying available capacity to the applicant and the local government. If a project exceeds the adopted level of service standards, the applicant is afforded the option of a negotiation period that may ❑r may not result in an executed/recorded mitigation agreement Mitigation at this stage is expressed as a Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement. For those residential developments that may have an impact but are otherwise exempt from concurrency, an exemption letter will be prepared for the applicant upon request. For those residential developments that are determined to not have an impact, a letter of no impact will be prepared for the applicant upon request. Exemption Letter: An applicant may request an Exemption Letter as documentation for the local government. These are projects that would be exempt from school concurrency review or projects that d❑ not impact the public schools. Exemptions from school concurrency are limited to existing single family or mobile home lots of record; amendments to previously approved site plans or plats that do not increase the number of dwelling units or change the dwelling unit type; age restricted communities with no permanent residents under the age of 18; or residential site plans or plats or amendments to site plans or plats that generate less than one student; or are authorized as a Development of Regional Impact (Chapter 380, F.S.) as of July 1, 2005. Concurrency ❑etermination Amendment: An applicant may request an amendment to a previously issued School Concurrency ❑etermination or to an application being processed. This review may require additional staff time beyond the initial concurrency determination review and results in a modified determination being issued. An amendment could result in a negotiation period and/or a mitigation agreement being issued or a previously approved determination being modified and reissued. 3 war ORDINANCE 82- 81 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 82-2 THE COM- PREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCOR- PORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 48-25-5 BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "A-2 AND "ST" TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR IMPERIAL LAKES LOCATED NE OF KREHLINC CONCRETE PLANT AND NORTH OF IMPERIAL WEST GOLF COURSE ; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE: WHEREAS, Paul Toppino, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the Zoning Classification of the herein described real property; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Count4l Commissioners of Collier County. Florida: �. SECTION ONE: The Zoning Classification of the herein described real property'_ r -" located in Section 15, Township 48, Range 25, CollierCounty, Florida is changed from "A-2 and ST" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD document attached hereto as Exhibit "A" which is incorporated heroin and by reference made part hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas Map Number. Number 48-25-5, as described in Ordinance 82-2, is hereby amended accordingly: rn ir East of the NEIc of Section 15, Township 48 South. fi r2.. -71 Rance 25 East a -c CoCa x 1 of 9 ti? y i 800ic 019 PACT W ti �, t.....4 b0WWA..) • L ►aurricr , • Plll.f,l' GA11 • SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of notice that is has been filed with the Secretary of State. DATE: September 14, 1982 ATTEST: •,'" Oil LL;MI J. REAGAN, C t,01., C. R=82'--25e PUD +, S`I717, • OF FLORIDA ) COC1N N OF COLLIER ) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY : )A..�~ C. . ' L' VIM , CHAIRMAN I, WIII.IAM J. RE74CM, Clerk of Courts in and for the Nmtieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true original of: ORDINANCE NO. 82-81 which was adopted by the Board of County Cmmissioners during Regular Session September 14, 1982. WIn;ESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Com- missioners of Collier County, Florida, this 1.5th day of September, 1982. WII Z M J. REAMN • ' Clerk of Courts and Clret�c�' Ex-officio to Board' of County Commissioners 13Y • Deputy Clark'• '''••......... This ordinance filed with the Secretary of State's office the-21at day of September, 1982 and acknowledgement of that filing received this 23rc1 day of September, 1982. Virg magi , Deputrelerk bm 016 PACs 74 2 of 9 • sn N JL i1 L'�' if LD fu% •�111 IMPERIAL LAKES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT DISTRICT ZONE: PUD PERMITTED USES: Multi -family dwellings; temporary sewage treatment and disposal facilitj PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES 6 STRUCTURES: Recreational and utilitarian accessory uses and structures which are customary In multi -family residential communities; administrative and sales offices, which offices may be located In temporary or permanent structures and may bo located within a residential structure. Temporary commercial fill pits. Removal of commercial fill from a proje lake shall be tarminatod prior to the development of dwelling units on that lake, and shall only occur in accord with standards Incorporated In a County approved commercial excavation permit. MAXIMUM GROSS PROJECT DENSITY: 5.5 units per acre. Total dwelling unit count shall not exceed 430. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: MULTI -FAMILY SITES: Minimum building setback from street: 50 ft. from back of curb for multi -family structures, 30 ft. from back of curb for accessory structures. Minimum rear yard: 25 feet Minimum side yards: One-half the buiiding height, but not less than 10 feet. Maximum building height: 5 stories. Minimum dwelling unit floor area: 1,000 sq. ft. Minimum offstreet parking spaces: 2 spaces per dwelling unit, 1} of which shall be Improved, 1 /2 of which may be unimproved and landscaped. Planned, but unimproved spaces shall be Improved at a future date when warranted by the Zoning Director. 3of9 1 BOOK 016 PAU U f Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document Page 2. • MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING UNIT DISTRIBUTION: Multi -family dwelling unit distribution shall occur generally as Indicated on the approved Master Plan. Two or more adjoining multi -family sites may be joined to become a single development site. With the approval of the Director, minor changes in lot line location and in the distribution of multi -family dwelling units indicated on the approved Master Plan may be made, so long as the total multl-family dwelling unit count does not exceed 430. MASTER PLAN: The approved Imperial Lakes Master Plan shall also constitute the approved Subdivision Master Plan. STREETS: Streets within the project will be privately owned and maintained. All streets within the project shall be classified as local. EXCEPTIONS TO COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS: Article X, Section 19: Street name signs shall be approved by the County Engineer but need not meet the U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Street pavement painting, striping, and reflective edging requirements shall be waived, except at the project entrance drive and at interior intersections. Artic►e Xi, Section 17.F. & G.: Street right-of-way and cross section shall be as shown on the following page. Article Xi, Section 17.H.: The 1,000 ft. maximum dead-end street length requirement shall be waived. Article X1, Section 17.1.: Back of curb radii at street intersections shall be minimum of 30 feet. Article XI, Section 17.K.: The requirement for 100 ft. tangent section between reverse curves of streets shall be waived. Article XI, Section 21.: The requirement for blank utility casings shall be waived. 4 of 9 I Kq"K 016 Fne 72. 6mmJ Imperla,%( Lakes, Pub!, 'Pa6� 3. W HVIPEf IAL. LAKES • ROADWAY TYPIOALS >OI , �'- 4' 4/ 1 E A A A ORA3� PERIMETER ROAD N.T.S-. �i w—. SOUTHERN' INTERIOR ROAD N.T.S. NOTES I) ZICfI.IALK LOLATIOAJ �AQIF-fa AND \�✓IL.L MEANCETZ IN ANC OUT OF THE V(AHT-Of-WAY L.IWF-' Z)AD01-rIONAL UTILI'TI L°ASEnnew-rS OUTSIDL Rtt„HT-oF-WAY I-I►+ES AS CEOD. 3)Fu:ure connection may be allowed to perimeter road from soath easement. A. 12" STAaLIZED SUF3C rZADE Lf3 R ■ ?�C, �. C." LIMEROCK BASE (PRIMEO) I" ASPHALTIL CON—c rzF-Tc 7YPE. (5-1) MOO. �. SL JPE To MEET EXI4jT1N4 CaRADIL E. SIC!51-, ALK = a"THILK- 4' WIDE s%tr-r I as 2 ao�>< 016 PAru 73 , 3 5,of 9 11 5 as r o 'J*A GRADE C, P, ACCESS ROAD N.T.S. SEE NOTES ON DETAIL SHEET IOP2- to cy :lu fr. Cl 47, • imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document Pago S. PUD APPROVAL STIPULATIONS. The following stipulations were made a part of the Board of County Commissioners approval of this PUD document. TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS: 1. The developer shall provide left and right turn storage lanes on CR-887 at Its intersection with the project entrance road. 2. Fifty feet of right-of-way (1 /2 of a planned 100 ft. right- of-way) shall be reserved along the north property boundary to accomodate an east/west arterial road shown on the County Comprehensive Plan. If this planned oast/west arterial Is deleted from the comprehensive plan at a future date, the developer shall be released from this right-of-way reservation obligation. UTILITIES: 1. All construction plans and technical specification for the proposed Utility Facilities must be reviewed and approved by the Utility Division prior to commencement of construction. 2. All on -site and off -site Utility Facilities construction by the Developer in connection with the Development shall be constructed to County Standards at no cost to the County and shall be deeded to the County Water -Sewer District, In accordance with applicable County Ordinances and Regu- lations. 3. All customers connecting to the sanitary sewer and water distribution facilities will be customers of the County Water -Sewer District and will be billed in accordance with a rate structure approved by the County. 4. All construction of proposed sanitary sewer system shall utilize the proper methods and materials to Insure water tight conditions. 7 of 9 I DOCK Ole PAu 75 Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document Page 6. S. Data pertaining to percolation rates for the proposed sewage disposal ponds shall be submitted with the con- struction plans to aid in evaluating the capacity of the site to handle the proposed wastewater flow. G. Appropriate Utility Easement dedicated to the County Water -Sower District must be provided for the proposed water and sewer facilities to be constructed, when they do not lie within public right-of-way or Utility Easomen 7. Data required under County Ordinance No.80-112 must submitted and approved prior to approval of the constr documents for the project. A copy of the approved DE permit application for the sewage collection and transmit system and a copy of the approved DER permit applieat and construction permit for the wastewater treatment fa to be utilized shall be submitted to the County Utility Department. 8. The petitioner and/or his assigns acknowledges that ado water supply and pressure may not be available from tt County's Regional Water System to the project when cor structlon is ready to commence. 9. If both adequate supply and pressure are not available the time construction is to start, building permits will i be issued until the petitioner or his assigns presents p specifications, and cost estimates prepared by a Florida registered engineer to the Fire Control District and Utl Division for their approval. These documents must she that the petitioner Is able and committed to provide on - water supply or storage facilities adequate and capable meeting the water demands of the proposed developmen' .These on -site facilities must not adversely affect the operation and safety of the existing water supply and service area. 8 of 9 I Ec'JK 016 rh;i 76 Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document Page 7. 10. If interim on -site facilities are required, the Developer Is strongly encouraged to coordinate his planning efforts with Utilities Division. A Joint financial cooperation and effort on the part of the Developer and other Developers in similar circumstances may permit the construction of permanent facilities in advance of the Districts schedule and financial abilities. 11. Connection to the County's Central Water and Sewer facilities will be made by the owners, their assigns or successors, at no cost to the County Water -Sewer District within 90 days after such facilities become available. COMMERCIAL EXCAVATION PIT: 1. All applicable provisions of Excavation Ordinance No.80-26 shall be adhered to. Z. Depth of excavation is limited to elevation -7.0 ngvd. for the north lake (Lake 1) and -4.0 ngvd. for the south lake(Lake 11) and a water quality monitoring program shall be initiated. 3. No blasting shall be conducted unless a Blasting Permit is obtained from the County Engineer. 4. There shall be no off -site discharge of groundwater from the excavation pits. S. The commercial excavation shall not exceed three years in duration from the date of issuance of the excavation permit. 6. The South.easement may be used for hauling of fill for one GO year after start of operations of fill activity. 9 of 9 HE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT SITE Imperial Lakes RPUD (PL20250006588) Deviation justification 1. Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, "Street System Requirements" and "Appendix B, Typical Street Sections and Right -of -Way Design Standards". The LDC establishes a minimum 60- foot right of way width for local streets. This deviation proposes to instead allow for private roads within the site to be located in a 50-foot wide access easement or Right -of -Way. justification: Number of lanes, required lane width, and other infrastructure can be accommodated within the proposed 50-foot access easements or rights of way and the reduction in the minimum required width will provide for a more efficient and compact development project. The reduced right-of-way width will allow for more flexibility in designing the internal road network due to the presence of three separate wetland preserves and two existing lakes within the project. This deviation will not have a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community as the 50 foot right of way width is sufficient to accommodate all required elements for a local roadway. The internal roadways will be private and have no impact to the public. Deviation 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02 A.2, "Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements", which requires Sidewalks and bike lanes must be constructed within public and private rights -of -way or easements, which are internal to the site both sides of the local/internal accessway to instead allow the option to construct a sidewalk on one side and a bike path on the other side of the roadway as depicted on Exhibit E1. justification: This deviation is warranted as the owner wishes to provide the option for separating cyclists from pedestrians within the community. This has been successfully utilized by the applicant in the Fiddler's Creek development and is well utilized by residents of the community. The deviation will not have a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community and will provide a safer opportunity for both cyclists and pedestrians to move about the Imperial Lakes community without conflicts or requiring use of the local streets by cyclists. Deviation 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07 A.5., "Preservation Standards", which requires preservation areas shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors, to allow the onsite preserves to be non-contiguous. justification: The deviation is warranted because the native vegetation areas are not naturally contiguous on -site. The proposed preserves represent areas of the highest quality vegetation (wetlands) on -site and their locations are consistent with the SFWMD Permit application. The proposed preserves represent areas of the highest quality vegetation (wetlands) and buffering around a bald eagle nest tree. Their locations are consistent with the SFWMD Permit application. The deviation will not have a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community. The deviation will enhance the opportunity to preserve the highest quality native vegetation on site as well as an area surrounding a bald eagle nest. There will be no detrimental impact to the community by granting this deviation GradyMinar a vav�-owwsan rompany Deviation Justification-rl. docx September 29, 2025 Page 1 of 1 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-] 144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.gradyminor.com f ORD;NANCE 82- 81 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 82-2 THE COM- PREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCOR- PORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 48-23-5 BY CHANCING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "A-2 AND "ST" TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR IMPERIAL LAKES LOCATED NE OF KREHLING CONCRETE PLANT AND NORTH OF IMPERIAL WEST GOLF COURSE ; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE: WHEREAS, Paul Toppino, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the Zoning Classification of the herein described real property; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida: �. SECTION ONE: The Zoning Classification of the herein described real property'- - located in Section 15, Township 48, Range 25, Collier County, Florida is changed from "A-2 and ST" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD document attached hereto as Exhibit "A" which is incorporated h-erain and by reference made part j hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas Map Number, Number 48-25-3, as described in Ordinance 82-2, is hereby amended accordingly: �w to T East of the NEIc of Section 15, Township 48 South, fi ti Rance 25 East Co (�.. . a ti N ti _. 1 of 9 800K Div PACT 69 [.. + 4 rc� • ' ' 'r�i�.�•,. r0AN SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of notice that is has been filed with the Secretary of State. DATE: September 14, 1982 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: BY: C14�� /"e LL;MI J. REAGAN, CL C. . ' L' M , CHAIRMAN D/. ',. r• ". ,. R=82-25C PUD STAT�-OF FLORIDA ) "rrin+• COC> N OF COLLIER ) I, WILIZ M J. RFW.AN, Clerk of Courts in and for the Mentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true original of: ORDINANCE NO. 82-81 which was adopted by the Board of County Com,nissieners during Regular Session September 14, 1982. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Hoard of County Com- missioners of Collier County, Florida, this 1.5th day of Septm er, 1982. WILLIAi"I J REAMN . Clerk of Courts and Ex-officio to Board'of �f County Cannissiogers ByVirgioda �'• • De puty - • Clark ........, This ordinance filed with the Secretary of State's office the-21at day of September, 1982 and acknowledgement of that' filing received this 23rd day of September, 1982. BY . Virg magr , Deput er K6 FAU 74 2 of 9 N �L RUC •�111 • • IMPERIAL LAKES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT C DISTRICT ZONE: PUD PERMITTED USES: Multi -family dwellings; temporary sewage treatment and disposal facilitj PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES 6 STRUCTURES: Recreational and utilitarian accessory uses and structures which are customary In multi -family residential communities; administrative and sales offices, which offices may be located in temporary or permanent structures and may bo located within a residential structure. Temporary commercial fill pits. Removal of commercial fill from a prole lake shall be terminated prior to the development of dwelling units on that lake, and shall only occur in accord with standards Incorporated In a County approved commercial excavation permit. MAXIMUM GROSS PROJECT DENSITY: 5.5 units per acre. Total dwelling unit count shall not exceed 430. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: MULTI -FAMILY SITES: Minimum building setback from street: 50 ft. from back of curb for multi -family structures, 30 ft. from back of curb for accessory structures. Minimum rear yard: 25 feet Minimum side yards: One-half the building height, but not less than 10 feet. Maximum building height: 5 stories. Minimum dwelling unit floor area: 1,000 sq. ft. Minimum offstreet parking spaces: 2 spaces per dwelling unit, 11 of which shall be Improved, 1 /2 of which may be unimproved and landscaped. Planned, but unimproved spaces shall be Improved at a future date when warranted by the Zoning Director. 3of9 1 r/� BOOK ON PAGE �6J, • Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document Page 2. • MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING UNIT DISTRIBUTION: Multi -family dwelling unit distribution shall occur generally as Indicated on the approved Master Plan. Two or more adjoining multi -family sites may be joined to become a single development site. With the approval of the Director, minor changes in lot line location and in the distribution of multi -family dwelling units indicated on the approved Master Plan may be made, so long as the total multi -family dwelling unit count does not exceed 430. MASTER PLAN: The approved Imperial Lakes Master Plan shall also constitute the approved Subdivision Master Plan. STREETS: Streets within the project will be privately owned and maintained. All streets within the project shall be classified as local. EXCEPTIONS TO COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS: Article X, Section 19: Street name signs shall be approved by the County Engineer but need not meet the U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Street pavement painting, striping, and reflective edging requirements shall be waived, except at the project entrance drive and at interior intersections. Artic►e X1, Section 17.F. & G.: Street right-of-way and cross section shall be as shown on the following page. Article X1, Section 17.H.: The 1,000 ft. maximum dead-end street length requirement shall be waived. Article X1, Section 17.1.: Back of curb radii at street intersections shall be minimum of 30 feet. Article XI, Section 17.K.: The requirement for 100 ft. tangent section between reverse curves of streets shall be waived. Article XI, Section 21.: The requirement for blank utility casings shalt be waived. 4 of 9 I Kq"K 016 FAGS 72- e 6mmJ W ImperlaP Lakes, Pub! IP06� 3. HVIPE51AL. LAKES • ROADWAY TYPIOALS . Sol , . a�v' T �•,. 1 4' 4! A A A aitA$3 PERIMETER ROAD I N.T.S-. SOUTHERN' & INTERIOR ROAD N.T.S. No?as 1) SICEI,JAL.K LOLATIOW 421ES A►40 \✓ILI,- MEANCER IN AND OU'r OF'THE RI(AHT-Of-WAY 1..INQ,' Z)AD01-rIONAL UTILI'rj tASF-mew r5 oU'r51OL it'4t 4 r'-OF-WA`( WWICS AS READ. 3)Fu:ure connection may be allowed to perimeter road from soith easement. A. 12" STAaLIZED SUB(mrZADE Lr3 R ■ 3C, �• l." L1mr-ROCK r6ASE (PRIMED) I" ASPHALTIC. LON rzF-TF- 7YPE- (6-1) MOO. �. -$LOPE To MCET f.)(IST►N4 4RADS r� slC:•../aLK - b"THICK- A' WIDE SNtr r I or 2 ao�>< 016 Pact: 73 , 3 1 5, o! 9 �. ,ti 11 GRADE C, P, -ACCESS ROAD N.T.S. SEE NOTES t Lrzqv-MC) ON DETAIL SHEET IGPZ to 0 Cy :lu .Iry 47, C-D G) • imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document Page S. PUD APPROVAL STIPULATIONS. The following stipulations were made a part of the Board of County Commissioners approval of this PUD document. TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS: 1. The developer shall provide left and right turn storage lanes on CR-887 at its intersection with the project entrance road. 2. Fifty feet of right-of-way (1 /2 of a planned 100 ft. right- of-way) shall be reserved along the north property boundary to accomodate an east/west arterial road shown on the County Comprehensive Plan. If this planned east/west arterial Is deleted from the comprehensive plan at a future date, the developer shall be released from this right-of-way reservation obligation. UTILITIES: 1. All construction plans and technical specification for the proposed Utility Facilities must be reviewed and approved by the Utility Division prior to commencement of construction. 2. All on-sito and off -site Utility Facilities construction by the Developer in connection with the Development shall be constructed to County Standards at no cost to the County and shall be deeded to the County Water -Sewer District, In accordance with applicable County Ordinances and Regu- lations. 3. All customers connecting to the sanitary sewer and water distribution facilities will be customers of the County Water -Sewer District and will be billed in accordance with a rate structure approved by the County. 4. All construction of proposed sanitary sewer system shall utilize the proper methods and materials to Insure water tight conditions. 7 of 9 1 50 Ole PAsi 75 o,.wwol Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document ' Page 6. 5. Data pertaining to percolation rates for the proposed sewage disposal ponds shall be submitted with the con- struction plans to aid in evaluating the capacity of the site to handle the proposed wastewater flow. G. Appropriate Utility Easement dedicated to the County Water -Sewer District must be provided for the proposed water and sewer facilities to be constructed, when they do not lie within public right-of-way or Utility Easemen 7. Data required under County Ordinance No.80-112 must submitted and approved prior to approval of the constr documents for the project. A copy of the approved DE permit application for the sewage collection and transmit system and a copy of the approved DER permit applicat and construction permit for the wastewater treatment fa to be utilized shall be submitted to the County Utility Department. 8. The petitioner and/or his assigns acknowledges that ado water supply and pressure may not be available from tt County's Regional Water System to the project when cor structlon Is ready to commence. 9. If both adequate supply and pressure are not available the time construction is to start, building permits will i be issued until the petitioner or his assigns presents p specifications, and cost estimates prepared by a Florida registered engineer to the Fire Control District and Utl Division for their approval. These documents must she that the petitioner is able and committed to provide on - water supply or storage facilities adequate and capable meeting the water demands of the proposed developmen, .Those on -site facilities must not adversely affect the operation and safety of the existing water supply and service area. 8 of 9 I bc9K 016 rh:i 76 Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document Page 7. 10. If Interim on -site facilities are required, the Developer Is strongly encouraged to coordinate his planning efforts with Utilities Division. A joint financial cooperation and effort on the part of the Developer and other Developers In similar circumstances may permit the construction of permanent facilities In advance of the Districts schedule and financial abilities. 11. Connection to the County's Central Water and Sewer facilities will be made by the owners, their assigns or successors, at no cost to the County Water -Sewer District within 90 days after such facilities become available. COMMERCIAL EXCAVATION PIT: 1. All applicable provisions of Excavation Ordinance No.80-26 shall be adhered to. 2. Depth of excavation Is limited to elevation -7.0 ngvd. for the north lake (Lake 1) and -4.0 n9vd. for the south lake(Lake 11) and a water quality monitoring program shall be Initiated. 3. No blasting shall be conducted unless a Blasting Permit Is obtained from the County Engineer. 4. There shall be no off -site discharge of groundwater f?om the excavation pits. S. The commercial excavation shall not exceed three years In duration from the date of Issuance of the excavation permit. 6. The South.easement may be used for hauling of fill for one CL) year after start of operations of fill activity. 9 of 9 . . . ...... . .. .... . 0 r r COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT February 4, 1991 Mr. R. Bruce Anderson, Agent Young, Van Assenderp, Varnadoe 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 33963 �E8. - 61994 3301 E. TA M1AM1 TR. NAPL,ES, FL 33962 (813)774-8282 A CERTIFIED DLUE CH[P COMMUNITY and Benton, P. A. Re: EXM-031-NN (s.econd response} for Property Described as the E 1/2 of NE 1/4 of Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East,.STRAP #482515-010.000; Owner: N. A. Realty Trust, Inc.. ZONING: PUD - Imperial Lakes (residential) Dear Bruce; Please be advised the following determination has been made by the Growth Planning Department regarding the above -referenced Exemption application. Though the subject property is deemed inconsistent and unimproved, it is exempted from the Zoning Reevaluation Program contained in the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance 90-23, pursuant to the Exemption granted below: Determination * approved Exemption Requested Development Dedications, Contributions and Conveyances (Sec. 2.4.6) Limitations 1. A determination which grants anyexemption shall exempt development only to the extent expressly contained in such exemption provision. 2. An exemption applies to the land and is therefore transferable from owner to owner of the land subject to the exemption. See enclosed memorandum from Bob Blanchard dated January,281 1991. Mr. Anderson February 4, 1991 Page 2 3. Anything in the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance to the contrary notwithstanding, an exemption may be revoked upon a showing by the County of a peril to public health, safety or general welfare of the residents of Collier County unknown at the time. of approval. It is important that a copy of this Exemption approval letter accompany all development order (e.g. Final Site Development Plan, building permit, sign permit, etc.) applications to assist in avoiding any delay in processing and reviewing of that development order application(s). Should you have any questions regarding the contents of this Letter, or the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance in general, please ::all me at 774-8282. PREPARED BY REVIEWED BY David Weeks Senior Planner Growth Planning Director cc: EXM/File DW/2.491/BA MEMORANDUM T0: David Weeks, Se�or Planner FROM: Bob Blanchardi Growth Planning Director DATE: January 289 1991 SUBJECT: EXM-031�NN, Imperial Lakes PUD, R. Bruce Anderson Agent, Request For Exemption 2.4.6 f BACKGROUND Section.2.4.6 of the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance (Ordinance 90-23) permits the following exemption to the application of the Ordinance: 2.4..6 Development Dedications, Contributions and Conveyances. The provisions of this Ordinance shall not affect the validity of any lawfully issued and effective development order (including a development order that acquired its density or intensity of use through the transfer of development rights) which was approved or issued subject to a condition that required a dedication, contribution or conveyance of a substantial interest in real or personal property to any governmental agency if: 2.4.6.1 The dedication, contribution or 0. conveyance on which the development order was conditioned has been lawfully granted, accepted by the applicable governmental agency and recorded, if appropriate, in the public records of Collier County, Florida; and 2.4.6.2 The dedication, contribution or conveyance on which the development order was conditioned benefits the public; and 2.4.6.3 The dedication, contribution or conveyance on which the development order was conditioned is in excess of those required under the Collier County Subdivision Regulations (Ordinance No. 76-6), as amended, the Collier County Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No.,82-2.), as amended, and the Collier County Growth Management Plan, as amended, and clearly benefits the public or property other than the subject property. This exemption is subject to the same limitations outlined Section 2.4.7 as all other exemptions provided for in the ordinance,. The applicant has submitted for.an exemption to the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance for the.Imperial Lakes PUD based on in the dedication of fifty (50) feet of right of way along the north property line to accommodate a portion of Livingston Road. ANALYSIS The applicant has furnished all of the information required by the exemption application. This analysis and any conclusion based thereon is conditioned upon the accuracy and validity of the facts, evidence or information as presented by the applicant. xt is clear that the referenced dedications represent a substantial interest of real or personal property. The d the time of the dedication was the sole owner of the property property owner at the time of development order approval an including the property subject to the dedication. Ordinance 82-81 is the development order that approves what is known as Imperial Lakes PUD. The development order requires the developer to reserve fifty feet of right of way along the north property boundary to accommodate an east/west arterial road (the planned Livingston Road). The development order provides that the developer could be released from this reservation if the planned arterial is ever deleted from the comprehensive plan. However, the applicant dedicated the property subject to the reservation to Collier County in the form of a Warranty Deed which was recorded in the public records of the County. The dedication will benefit the public as Livingston Road is I constructed. The ultimate construction of this corridor will provide an alternative corridors for travel in this area of the County. The Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance requires that the dedication,. conveyance and contributions that are the subject of the exemption application be in excess of the County's Subdivision Regulations (Ordinance 76-6), Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance 82-2) and the Collier County Growth Management Plana these references make it clear that the comparison is to the regulations currently in effect, not those regulations in effect at the time of development order approval. The dedication of this right of way is beyond the requirements outlined in these three regulations. FINDINGS Based on the material provided by the applicant and the above analyses, I have made the following findings: 1. The property owner at the time of the dedication of the right of way for a portion of the Livingston Road Corridor had a substantial interest in the property which included the right of way. sale owner of the property. The property owner was the 2. The reservation of fifty feet of right of way was a condition of the development order (Ordinance 82W81) approving the Imperial Lakes PUD. 3. The dedication of the right of way was accepted by Collier County and recorded in the Public Records of Collier County. 4. The provision of right of way is in excess of the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations, Zoning Ordinance and the Growth Management Plan. i CONCLUSION This application meets the criteria for an exemption to the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance under Section 2.4.6 of that ordinance and is approved. �i FEB � � 1�Ji RESOLUTION 97- 72 A RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.7.3.4 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND bEVELOPMENT CODE AFFECTING ORDINANCE 82-81 KNOWN A3 IMPERIAL LAKES PUD, EXTENDING THE CURRENT PUD APPROVAL TO FEBRUARY 11, 2002; AND PROVIDINt3 AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the imperial Lakes PUD, Ordinance 82-91 adopted on September 14, 1982, may be subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.1, of the Land Development Code LDC), Time Limits far Approved PUD Zoning Districts together with their respective Master Planer and WHEREAS, the PUD was adopted consistent with and under the provisions of the Collier County Growth Management Plan and has a valid and effective Final Sfte Development Plan approval, which approval prohibited the issuance of building permits for the PUD until Livingston Road was constructed by the County, and said road has not yet been constructed; and WHEREP,S, the density of the PUD has previously been determined to be vested; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has reviewed the PUD and has determined to extend the current PUD Zoning for five years, until February 11, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florfda that: 1. The above recitals are adopted herein by reference as if fully set forth herein. 2. This Resolution shall constitute evidence of the County's compliance with the review requirements of Section 2.7.3.4 of the LAC. 3. Pursuant to said section of the LDC, the current PUD approval is hereby extended to February 11, 2002; at the end of which time it may be determined whether the PUD property owner is required to submit to the procedures in LDC Section 2.7.3.4. 4. Prior to construction under the authority of approved Final Site Development Plan (ESOP) No. 89-134, said FSDP shall be reviewed for compliance with the LDC requirements in effect on the date of this Resolution and shall be amended to be brought into compliance to the extent that said requirements do not invalidate or require changes or amendments to the permits of other agencies and do not cause the placement of buildings and infrastructure shown on the FSDP to be changed or the buildable area to be xeduced. _�.._.-......_..._._.--�.�_�._,_..........._......._,.._-____�.."._... _........�r._..._ This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its approval. BE IT FURTHER RE30LVED that this Resolution be racorded in the minutes of this Board and in the records of the Petition Far Khich the extension is granted. vote. This Resolution adapted after motion, second and majority Done this _� day of February, 1997. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI83ION8R9 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ;' d3WIt3HT E: ;�BRQGK, CLERK �,' �, i. "•., `�1 • .ROVED AB.�TQ�•FORM' AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: .. ... ��. MARJ iE M. S DENT A33ISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY 50•zba\r�tolution PAPE - DAWSON Imperial Lakes RPUD (PUDA) PL20250006588 CCPC Hearing Backup Application and Supporting Documents Bonita Springs I Orlando I Jacksonville I Maitland I Fort Myers I Sarasota I Miramar Beach I Freeport 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 239-947-1144 PAPE-DAWSON.COM Florida Engineering Firm #39101 Florida Surveying & Mapping License #LB8694 GradyMinor a PAPS-DAWSO i company Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects August 11, 2025 Amended September 29, 2025 Ms. Laura Delohn Collier County Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Imperial Lakes RPUD Amendment (PL20250006588), Submittal 1 Dear Ms. Delohn: On behalf of our client, N.A. Realty Trust, Inc., we are submitting an application for an Amendment to a PUD for the above referenced project. Imperial Lakes is vested for 430 multifamily dwelling units. The proposed amendment to the Imperial Lakes RPUD is being requested in order to add a range of dwelling unit types and appropriate development standards for each dwelling unit type. The amendment is also intended to correct a scrivener's error that did not remove the "ST" Overlay from the County zoning map, even though the PUD Ordinance states it was removed. The PUD document and conceptual master plan has been revised to be consistent with current PUD format. Documents filed with submittal 1 include the following: 1. Cover Letter 2. Application 3. Evaluation Criteria 4. Preapp Notes S. Affidavit of Authorization 6. Property Ownership Disclosure Form 7. Covenant of Unified Control 8. Addressing Checklist 9. Warranty Deed(s) and Easements 10. Determination Letter 02-04-1991 11. Excavation Permit 12. Aerial Location Map 13. Environmental Data Requirements Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC Ph. 239-947-1144 • Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 • LB 0005151 • LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Ms. Laura DeJohn RE: Imperial Lakes RPUD Amendment (PL20250006588), Submittal 1 August 11, 2025, Amended September 29, 2025 Page 2 of 2 14. Traffic Impact Study 15. Historical Waiver 16. School Impact Analysis 17. Original PUD Approval 18. RPUD Exhibits A-F 19. Deviation Justification Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Enclosures Cc: N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. GradyMinor File (IMPLSP) Need Help? Co per Col."ty Growth Management Community Development Department GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsections 10.02.13 E; and 10.03.06.8; and Ch. 3 G.2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. File a separate application for an insubstantial or minor change to a PUD. Name of Property Owner(s) APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 8156 Fiddler's Creek Pkwy Telephone: 239.732.9400 E-Mail Address:-parisij@gulfbay.com City, Naples Cell: State: FL ZIP: 34114 Name of Agent: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP 1 Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Firm: Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC 1 Coleman, Yovanavich R Koester, P.A. Address: 3800 Via Del Rey city: Bonita Springs State: FL Zip: 34134 Telephone: 239-947-1144 Cell: E-Mail Address: warnold@gradyminor.com; sumpenhour@gradyminor.com; ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com If Property is under contract to be sold: Name of Property Buyer(s): N.A. Name of Applicant if different than buyer: N.A. Address: Telephone: E-Mail Address: Name of Agent: N.A. Firm: Address: City: City: Cell: Telephone: Cell: E-Mail Address: State: ZIP: State: ZIP: PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 1 of 11 Planning and Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive - Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www. co I I ie rcc u n tyfl. gov REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: N •A• Zoning district(s) to the N.A. Zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Undeveloped Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Residential Dwelling Units Original PUD Name: Imperial Lakes PUD Ordinance No: 82-81 PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • If required to do so at the pre -application meeting, the applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six (6) months, maximum 1" to 460' scale), and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerningthe legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: 15/ 48/ 25 Lot: N.A. Block: N.A. Subdivision: N.A. Metes & Bounds Description: See Exhibit D of the Proposed PUD Document Plat Book: N.A. Page #: N.A Property ID Number: 00153160004 Size of Property: 2,634+/- ft. x 1,268+/- ft. = 3,345,408+/- Total Sq. Ft. Address/General Location of Subject Property: of Castlewood at Imperial PUD PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 Q Acres: 78.28+/- North of Imperial Golf Club and west ❑ Commercial❑ Residential ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Industrial ❑ Community Facilities ❑ Research and Technology Park ❑ Airport Operations ❑ Other: PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 2 of 11 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N I, Industrial Undeveloped S GC, RMF16 and KrehIing Industries PUD Imperial Golf Course, residential and undeveloped E A and Castiewocd at Imperial Undeveloped and residential W A Undeveloped If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: N.A- / N.A. / N.A. Lot: N-A- Block: N.A. Subdivision: N.A. Plat Book: N.A. Page #: N.A. Metes & Bounds Description: N.A. Property ID Number: N.A. ASSOCIATIONS Complete the followingfor all registered Home Owner / Civic Association(s) that could be affected by this petition and located within I,000 feet of the subject property. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Civic Associations and Communities page on the Board of County Commissioner's website. Applicant is responsible for and shall confirm the current mailing addresses for each association as registered by the Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations. Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Imperial Golf Estates Homeowners Association, Inc. Mailing Address: 9150 Galleria Court Suite 201 Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: PC HOX 111809 City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34199 Imperial Golf Club, Inc. City: Naples State: EL ZIP: 34108 Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Castlewood at Imperial Homewoner's Association Inc. Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: City: —State: —ZIP: City: —State: ZIP: PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 3 of 11 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what subdistrict, policy, or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that subdistrict, policy, or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 4 of 11 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? No Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes ❑1 No If yes, please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 8 B of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.05. Fallowing the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment, or change, for a period of six [6] months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing, and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees, and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 5 of 11 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. Address: 8156 Fiddler's Creek Pkwy City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34114 Telephone: 239.732.9400 Cell: E-Mail Address: parisij@gulfbay.com Address of Subject Property (If available): N.A. City: State: Zip: 34119 PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: 1548 / 25 Lot: N.A. Block: N.A Subdivision: N.A. Metes & Bounds Description: See Exhibit D of the PUD Exhibits Plat Book: N.A. page #: N.A. Check applicable system: Property ID Number: 00153160004 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System X b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System d. Package Treatment Plant e. Septic System Check applicable system: Provide Name: (GPD Capacity): Type: TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System X b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: No increase in density or intensity Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: N.A. B. Sewer -Peak: NA Average Daily Demands: N.A. Average Daily Demands: N•A. PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 6 of 11 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Attach additional pages if necessary. rkM Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 7 of 11 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code H Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G.2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code The following submittal requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please upload the submittal items with cover sheets attached to each section via the GMCD Portal. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted, or processed. View sample PUD document. REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with narrative statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary Completed application with required attachments (download latest version) Pre -application meeting notes Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized Property Ownership Disclosure Form Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control Completed Addressing Checklist (no older than 6 months) Warranty Deed(s) Signed and sealed Boundary Survey (no older than 6 months) ❑X Architectural rendering of proposed structures X Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. Q ❑ Statement of utility provisions Li Statement of compliance with Growth Management Plan Environmental data requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 X Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. See Chapter 7 A. of the Administrative Code ❑ ❑X Listed or protected species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. ❑ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Historical and Archaeological Survey or Waiver 0 ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable with residential uses X Location of existing public facilities that will serve the PUD Electronic copy of all required documents Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑X ❑ Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and one (1) 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ ❑X *Checklist continues on next page PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 9 of 11 Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑X ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined ❑X ❑ Development Commitments (infrastructure and related matters) 01 Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification Li I X +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: ■ Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses ■ Exhibit B: Development Standards Table for each type of land use • Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code • Exhibit D: Legal Description • Exhibit E. List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each • Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas, pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08 A.2.a.(2)(b)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS— INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nicole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Anthony Stolts Parks and Recreation Director: ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ Stormwater Management: ❑ Fire: City of Naples Planning Director: Erica Martin Q Other: ❑ City of Naples Utilities: ❑ Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS ® Fire Pre -Application Meeting: $150.00 (Applied as credit towards fire review fee upon submittal of application if within 9 months of the pre-app meeting date) ® Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 XJ Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 Q Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 ® Transportation Review Fees: • Methodology Review: $500.00 (Methodology by Email to Staff) *Additional fees tc be determined at Methodology Meeting • Minor Study Review: $750.00 • Major Study Review $1,500.00 PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 10 of 11 ® Fire Planning Review Fee: ($300 PUD2, PUDR) ($150 PUDA) ® Estimated Legal Advertising fee: • CCPC: $1,125.00 • BCC: $500.00 ® If appiicable, an additional fee for Property Owner Notifications will be billed to the applicant after Hearing Examiner hearing date. (Variable) ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: • Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District incoordination with the County All fees are collected at the time of application. Property Notification Letters, if required by The Land Development Code, will be invoiced after the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, l attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package, l understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee far the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department i GMCD Public Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountvfl.gov Signature of Petitioner or Agent D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Printed Named of Signing Party 9/29/2025 Date PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 11 of 11 Imperial Lakes RPUD (PL20250006588) Evaluation Criteria Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staffs analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. The Imperial Lakes PUD is vested for 430 conventional multi -family dwelling units. The PUD amendment proposes to add a range of dwelling unit types including single-family detached, two-family attached and townhomes. Appropriate development standards for each dwelling unit type have been added. The development standards, while different than conventional zoning district standards, are consistent with those utilized by the applicant in other PUDs. These standards will allow the project to be developed in an innovative way due to the presence of the non-contiguous wetland preserves and an active Bald Eagle nest. The PUD will have a maximum of 430 total multi -family dwelling units or a maximum of 313 dwelling units if a combination of dwelling unit types are constructed. The conceptual master plan has been revised, and it is shown in the current PUD master plan format. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The additional types of dwelling units proposed are appropriate and consistent with the pattern of development in the area. The area to the east, north and south are developed with a variety of single family and multi -family dwellings. Veteran's Memorial Boulevard must be extended west from its current terminus at the adjacent Aubrey Rogers High School and will serve as access to the Imperial Lakes PUD. The Collier County Transportation Management Services Department Head has confirmed that County funds are available to construct the extension of Veteran's Memorial Boulevard past the project's entrance, and the applicant will be meeting with the Department Head to discuss entering a Developer Agreement, if it elects to at its sole discretion. Development of Imperial Lakes can occur following the extension of Veteran's Memorial Blvd. to the project's entrance or, at the Developer's option, following the entering of a Developer's Agreement with Collier County. The site will have water and sewer services provided by Collier County Utilities and will be obtaining a surface water management permit from the South Florida Water Management District. Based upon the findings of the PUD's Traffic Impact Statement, it was determined that the most -intense development alternative of Imperial Lakes RPUD will not have a negative impact upon the surrounding road network or cause any roadways to operate below their adopted level of service standard. It was determined that all roadways within the project's area of impact, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the net new nonvested traffic generated by the maximum development intensity of up to 313 single family dwelling units. More specifically, the existing property rights would allow for the development of 313 single-family units or as vested up to 430 multi -family units or 216 single-family or any combination of multi-family/single-family dwelling units that does not exceed the previously vested trip cap of 205 new PM peak hour two-way trips. GradMinor Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx GradyMinor 27, 2025 a vav�-owwsan company Page 1 of 11 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-] i44 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.gradyminor.com b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. The applicant is the owner of the PUD. G Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) The Imperial Lakes PUD lies within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict of the Future Land Use Map of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The subdistrict permits residential and non-residential land uses at a base density of 4 dwelling units per acre. The original PUD was approved in 1982 at 5.5 dwelling units per acre, which was consistent with the Growth Management Plan at that time. The property was determined to be exempt from the 1990 Zoning Re-evaluation Ordinance due to the required roadway dedication for the Veteran's Memorial Boulevard ROW. Policy 5.10 of the Future Land Use Element recognizes that those properties determined to be exempt or having been issued a compatibility exception are deemed to be consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. The legally vested density for the 430 multi -family development is 5.5 dwelling units per acre. This PUD amendment application proposes to add a range of residential dwelling unit types including single family, two family, variable lot line, and townhouse. The Imperial Lakes PUD was deemed consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan through an exemption determination by the County during the 1990 zoning re- evaluation program. Policy 5.1 of the Future Land Use Element permits changes to be made to projects that received compatibility exemptions provided that the change does not result in an overall increase in the intensity of development compared to that allowed in the current zoning district. The site today would be eligible for up to 313 market rate units (78.2 ac x 4 du/ac = 313). The proposed option that would include multi -family and non -multi- family units has been capped at a maximum of 313 units and the cap for multi -family only will remain at the vested maximum of 430 units. Any combination of uses are subject to the trip cap established in the PUD. The alternative development scenario of 313 dwellings would include a combination of multi -family and non -multi -family dwelling units which is consistent with the current density rating system of the Growth Management Plan. Future Land Use Element Policy 5.4 requires that all applications must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan as determined by the Board of County Commissioners. The Imperial Lakes PUD was deemed consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan through an exemption determination by the County during the 1990 zoning re- evaluation program. Policy 5.1 of the Future Land Use Element permits changes to be made Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 2 of 11 to projects that received compatibility exemptions provided that the change does not result in an overall increase in the intensity of development compared to that allowed in the current zoning district. The site today would be eligible for up to 313 units market rate units (78.2 ac x 4 du/ac = 313). The proposed single-family option has been capped at a maximum of 313 units and the cap for multi -family will remain at the vested maximum of 430 units. The proposed PUD amendments are consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Policies 5.5 and 5.7 discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl by utilizing urban areas for development before redesignating new property for urban intensity. The subject PUD is an existing and vested project. It is also an infill project due to its adjacency to developed properties to the south and east. The site is within the Urban designated area and has access to potable water and sanitary sewer facilities located within Veteran's Memorial Parkway, which terminates at Aubrey Rogers High School, located immediately to the east. The PUD amendment does not promote urban sprawl. Policy 5.6 requires that new projects will be compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses. The proposed amendments to the existing PUD are compatible and complementary to the surrounding land uses. The project was previously approved for multi -story, multi -family development. This amendment adds dwelling unit types and appropriate development standards. The master plan has also been revised to reflect changing preservation areas due to current regulatory standards, and proximity to an existing Bald Eagle nest. Objective 7, and implementing Policies 7.1-7.7, promote smart growth policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to adhere to the development character of the County. The proposed project cannot be interconnected to the adjoining propertyto the west, south or east as these lands are utilized for preservation (Conservation Collier), gated residential development and existing High School respectively. No direct interconnection to the high school is proposed; however, pedestrian access to the high school will be available via the sidewalk that will be connected to the existing sidewalk in the Veteran's Memorial Boulevard ROW. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The project will connect directly to Veteran's Memorial Boulevard, which is a designated 2- lane collector roadway, which will be extended along the project's property frontage. The property owner previously provided an easement for Veteran's Memorial Boulevard, and the easement has been identified on the conceptual PUD Master Plan. Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The project proposes a single access point along Veteran's Memorial Boulevard and provides for an internal roadway network. Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 3 of 11 Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. The subject PUD is an infill project due to its adjacency to developed properties to the south and east. Interconnection to the fully developed single-family golf course neighborhood to the south is not feasible as it is a gated community. Property to the west is owned by Collier County and was acquired as an urban preserve as part of the Conservation Collier program. Interconnection with the property immediately east of Imperial Lakes is not feasible to provide vehicular connection as it is owned by the Collier County Public School District and developed as the Aubrey Rogers High School. Pedestrian connectivity will occur via the sidewalk that will be constructed on Veteran's Memorial Boulevard. The PUD is consistent with the intent of Goal 7 and implementing policies of the Future Land Use Element. Access will be to a collector roadway as encouraged and a range of housing types are proposed consistent with the County policies. No direct interconnection can be provided to the nearby residential developments due to their developed status. FLUE Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. The Imperial Lakes RPUD is consistent with this Policy. The project will have either sidewalks on both sides of the internal loop road or an optional separate bike lane and sidewalk on either side of the local street. The project will be connected to a sidewalk that will be constructed within the Veteran's Memorial Boulevard ROW, which will provide pedestrian access to the nearby school and other residential neighborhoods. Transportation Element Please see the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by which demonstrates compliance with the Level of Service Standards for the surrounding roadways. Conservation and Coastal Management Element The PUD is consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, and specifically Policy 6.1.1. Policy 6.1.1 requires preservation of 25% of the existing native vegetation on sites exceeding 20 acres in size. The site contains approximately 47.86± acres of native vegetation and 15.45± acres are proposed to be preserved on -site in conservation easements. The Comprehensive Plan requires preservation of 25% of the on -site native vegetation, and the 15.45± acres of on -site preserve shown on the conceptual master plan represents 25% of the on -site native vegetation, which meets the 25% standard. The on -site preserve areas are not contiguous due to prior excavated areas on the property. These designated preserve areas do represent the highest quality native vegetation and habitat on -site. A deviation to permit the non-contiguous preserve areas has been requested. Policy 6.2.5 is directed at reducing impacts to wetlands. The conceptual PUD master plan has been designed to minimize impacts to the existing on -site wetlands. The preserve areas identified on the conceptual PUD master plan are wetland areas that will be preserved with permitted impacts to other wetlands on -site to be permitted through the ERP process with the Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 4 of 11 SFW and USCCOE. The wetland areas are not naturally connected; therefore, a deviation has been submitted to permit the non-contiguous preserve areas. The two preserve areas located along the eastern property boundary do abut off -site preserve areas on the Collier County Public School site and provide a buffer to an active eagle nest. The radius from the Bald Eagle nest is shown on the conceptual PUD master plan. Please see the environmental assessment prepared by Turrell Hall & Associates for a discussion on the vegetation associations on the site, and further discussion on the nearby Bald Eagle nest. Objective 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. The environmental assessment discusses the proximity to listed species and acknowledges that the site will be developed with guidelines of the Florida Wildlife Commission or regulating agencies. The site does propose preserve areas adjacent to the nearby Bald Eagle nest. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The PUD contains development standards for each residential dwelling unit type, which are similar to other previously approved projects in the vicinity. The site does contain some good quality native vegetation, and the conceptual PUD master plan identifies the locations of the proposed buffer areas and native preservation areas which provide buffers and open space consistent with the LDC requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. Usable open space will be provided within the PUD as required by the LDC and will meet the 60% requirement. Native preservation areas have been designated and are provided consistent with Section 3.05 of the LDC. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The project is subject to concurrency and adequate infrastructure must be in place to support future development on the site. There are no known capacity issues that will impact this project. Development cannot commence until the extension of Veteran's Memorial Boulevard occurs. The Collier County Transportation Management Services Department Head has confirmed that County funds are available to construct the extension of Veteran's Memorial Boulevard past the project's entrance, and the applicant will be meeting with the Department Head to discuss entering a Developer Agreement, if it elects to at its sole discretion. If a Developer Agreement is not entered into, development will not occur until Veteran's Memorial Boulevard is extended to the projects entrance. g The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The Imperial Lakes PUD is an existing PUD, which is surrounded by zoned undeveloped and developed land. Expansion of the PUD boundary is not proposed. Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 5 of 11 h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The Imperial Lakes PUD was originally approved September 14,1982, by Ordinance Number 82-81. The proposed PUD includes uses and development standards appropriate for the site and consistent with the policies expressed in the Growth Management Plan. LDC Section 10.02.08 F - Requirements for Amendments to the Official Zoning Atlas Nature of requirements of Planning Commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08 E shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistentwith the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth ManagementPlan. Future Land Use Element Policy 5.4 requires that all applications must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan as determined by the Board of County Commissioners. The Imperial Lakes PUD was deemed consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan through an exemption determination by the County during the 1990 zoning re- evaluation program. Policy 5.1 of the Future Land Use Element permits changes to be made to projects that received compatibility exemptions provided that the change does not result in an overall increase in the intensity of development compared to that allowed in the current zoning district. The site today would be eligible for up to 313 units market rate units (78.2 ac x 4 du/ac = 313). The proposed development option of multi -family and non -multi- family dwelling units has been capped at a maximum of 313 units, and the cap for the multi- family dwelling unit only option will remain at the vested maximum of 430 units. Policies 5.5 and 5.7 discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl by utilizing urban areas for development before redesignating new property for urban intensity. The subject PUD is an existing and vested project. It is also an infill project due to its adjacency to developed properties to the south and east. The site is within the Urban designated area and has access to potable water and sanitary sewer facilities located within Veteran's Memorial Boulevard, which terminates at the Aubrey Rogers High School, located immediately to the east. The PUD amendment does not promote urban sprawl. Policy 5.6 requires that new projects will be compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses. The proposed amendments to the existing PUD are compatible and complementary to the surrounding land uses. The project was previously approved for multi -story, multi -family development. This amendment adds dwelling unit types and appropriate development Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 6 of 11 standards. The master plan has also been revised to reflect changing preservation areas due to current regulatory standards, and proximity to an existing Bald Eagle nest. Objective 7, and implementing Policies 7.1-7.7, promote smart growth policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to adhere to the development character of the County. The proposed project cannot be interconnected to the adjoining property to the west, south or east as these lands are utilized for preservation, gated residential development and an existing High School respectively. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The project will connect directly to Veteran's Memorial Boulevard, which is a designated 2- lane collector roadway, which will be extended along the project's property frontage. Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The project proposes a single access point along Veteran's Memorial Boulevard and provide for an internal roadway network. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. The subject PUD is an infill project due to its adjacency to developed properties to the south and east. Interconnection to the fully developed single-family golf course neighborhood to the south is not feasible as it is a gated community. Property to the west is owned by Collier County and was acquired as an urban preserve as part of the Conservation Collier program. Interconnection with the property immediately east of Imperial Lakes is not feasible to provide vehicular connection as it is owned by the Collier County Public School District and developed as the Aubrey Rogers High School, which is an access -restricted school property. Pedestrian connectivity will occur via the sidewalk that will be constructed on Veteran's Memorial Boulevard. The PUD is consistent with the intent of Goal 7 and implementing policies of the Future Land Use Element. Access will be to a collector roadway as encouraged and a range of housing types are proposed consistent with the County policies. No direct interconnection can be provided to the nearby residential developments due to their developed status. FLUE Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. The Imperial Lakes RPUD is consistent with this Policy. The project will have either sidewalks on both sides of the internal loop road or an optional separate bike lane and sidewalk on either side of the local street. The project will be connected to a sidewalk that will be constructed within the Veteran's Memorial Boulevard ROW, which will provide pedestrian access to the nearby school and other residential neighborhoods. Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 7 of 11 Transportation Element Please see the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by which demonstrates compliance with the Level of Service Standards for the surrounding roadways. Conservation and Coastal Management Element The PUD is consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, and specifically Policy 6.1.1. Policy 6.1.1 requires preservation of 25% of the existing native vegetation on sites exceeding 20 acres in size. The site contains approximately 47.86± acres of native vegetation and 15.45± acres are proposed to be preserved on -site in conservation easements. The Comprehensive Plan requires preservation of 25% of the on -site native vegetation, and the 15.45± acres of on -site preserve shown on the conceptual master plan represents 25% of the on -site native vegetation, which meets the 25% standard. Policy 6.2.5 is directed at reducing impacts to wetlands. The conceptual PUD master plan has been designed to minimize impacts to the existing on -site wetlands. The preserve areas identified on the conceptual PUD master plan are wetland areas that will be preserved with permitted impacts to other wetlands on -site to be permitted through the ERP process with the SFWMD and USCCOE. The wetland areas are not naturally connected; therefore, a deviation has been submitted to permit the non-contiguous preserve areas. The two preserve areas located along the eastern property boundary do abut off -site preserve areas on the Collier County Public School site and provide a buffer to an active eagle nest. The radius from the Bald Eagle nest is shown on the conceptual PUD master plan. Please see the environmental assessment prepared by Turrell Hall & Associates for a discussion on the vegetation associations on the site, and further discussion on the nearby Bald Eagle nest. Objective 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. The environmental assessment discusses the proximity to listed species and acknowledges that the site will be developed with guidelines of the Florida Wildlife Commission or regulating agencies. The site does propose preserve areas adjacent to the nearby Bald Eagle nest. 2. The existing land use pattern. The subject property has developed residential properties to the south and southeast. Lands to the west are owned by Collier County and are part of the County's Conservation Collier Urban Land preservation program. Lands to the east are owned by the Collier County School District and are developed as the Aubrey Rogers High School. The PUD has previously been approved and is a vested PUD for up to 430 dwelling units. The PUD is located in the urban area and will have urban services available at the site. Further, the applicant is coordinating with Collier County to extend Veteran's Memorial Boulevard to the site. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property is already zoned PUD and is entitled to construct 430 multi -family dwellings on the site. An isolated district will not be created as a result of the proposed amendment to the PUD. Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 8 of 11 4. W ether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The PUD boundaries are not illogically drawn and reflect the entirety of property owned by the applicant. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The existing PUD provides for only multi -family dwelling unit product types. The amendment proposes to add a full range of housing types, and the potential for development of affordable housing option. These modifications are proposed in response to changing market conditions and continuing demand in the urban area for a variety of housing types. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change to the PUD to add a full range of dwelling unit product types will not have any adverse impact on living conditions in the area. The PUD is an active PUD and has the ability to construct up to 430 multi -family dwellings on the property today. The development standards and perimeter buffers are adequate to ensure that the PUD will not adversely affect living conditions in the surrounding area. The type of dwelling units proposed are consistent with those types of units developed in the surrounding communities. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect publicsafety. Based upon the TIS, the project will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion. The applicant will be responsible for completing a portion Veteran's Memorial Boulevard along the property frontage. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. Prior to development occurring on the property, a surface water management permit will need to be issued by the South Florida Water Management District. The District permit will address surface water management on -site as well as the amount of water that may be discharged off -site. The applicant is working with Collier County to address stormwater needs for the Veteran's Memorial Boulevard extension. Drainage problems will not result from development of this property. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Open space will be provided in accordance with the Collier County Land Development Code. The PUD amendment will not result in reduction of light or air to adjacent areas. 10. W ether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 9 of 11 The residential development resulting from the proposed PUD amendment will not adversely affect property values. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The PUD amendment will have no impact to the improvement or redevelopment of adjacent properties. The PUD has been in existence since 1982, which preceded any of the residential development near this PUD. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The PUD amendment is consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and LDC and does not constitute a grant of special privilege to the property owner. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used inaccordance with existing zoning. The PUD does currently permit 430 multi -family residences to be constructed on -site. The amendment adds product types consistent with the real estate market trends, which may include single-family, multi -family and townhome dwelling types. The Growth Management Plan encourages projects to include a variety of product types. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The PUD amendment to add a wider variety of dwelling unit product types does not change the scale of the currently approved project and is not out of scale with the needs of the community. The increase in density for a potential affordable housing component is in response to the need Countywide for affordable housing. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The property is already zoned PUD and permits up to 430 dwelling units. The owner of the property simply wishes to modify the PUD to permit additional dwelling unit product types, including an option for affordable housing. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The property has previously been altered with the construction of the two existing lakes on - site. Additional land alteration will be required to clear and fill the residential development pads, which is typical for most land development activities in Collier County. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilitiesand services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx October 27, 2025 Page 10 of 11 Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. There are adequate roadways and utilities available for the site. There are no public facilities deficiencies at the present time, and none will occur as a result of this project. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. The project is consistent with the Growth Management Plan, and it is compatible with surrounding development. Evaluation Criteria- rLdocx October 27, 2025 Page 11 of 11 -t, Collier County GMCD Public Portal Land Development Code Administrative Code Zoning Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: PUD An-tendment (PUDA ) Date and Time: Tuesday 7/1/2025 at 3 : OOpm ZOOM Property Information Assigned Planner: Laura DeJohn Project Name: Imperial Lakes [PUDA] PL.#: 20250006588 Property lD #: 00153160004 Current Zoning: Imperia'. Lakes (PUD) Project Address: City: Naples -State: FL Zip: 3 411 C Applicant: GradyMinor - Sharon Umpenhour Agent Name radyMinor - D. Wayne ArnoldpkoC 2 9-947-1144 Agent/Firm Address; 3800 Via Del Rey Cisonita Spr s, ;"L 34134 y: 'Sete:_ Zip: Property Owner: N A Realty Trust Inc Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: 78.48 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: Max 313 SF Units 4 d/u per Acre iii. Proposed # of Affordable Housing Units: iv. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: V. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: vi. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vii. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#IPL.#: viii. is Project within an Area of Historical/Archaeological Probability? Pre -Application Meeting Notes 3/10/2025 Page 1 of 5 Growth Managcmcnl 01rnwunity Dovelopracnt • Piannino & Zoning 2800 North Horscshoe Drikc • \'aPlc., FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • %%%%w collicrrfjomY _,soN, Collier County J Meeting Notes 5,e-,o- AVWC-h,Q vTeS oN ?A+G,a �. t �� �• 3.a. S ¢10 Y4774chJ-C) nkA-t L � ► cit�.r c -q a b. rpm t Nfa wired: The most current Application Forms & the Property Ownership Disclosure Form are required for your submittal. Download from this link: https:1/www.co1Hercou fl. oil a�ernmentJ rowth-mana emerttldi�isionsl Fannin -and- zoninp• divisionlland-use-a lications#!I Disclaimer., inforrnation provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LAC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required date - Pre -Application Meeting Notes 3/10/2025 Page 2 of 5 Growth Management Community Development • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naplez, FL 34104 • 239-252-24M • N%m %%,. nl irrruu nt, tl ui, r PL20250006588 - Imperial Lakes PUDA - 2,-"j ! V C. P 0 s Site is 78.5 acres per Property Appraiser. Site area was 78.28 acres per Ord. 82-081. Site area was 76.81 acres per PUDA-PL20150001695, recognizing reduction of 1.47 acres due to ROW dedication. Camp Planning staff determined during review of PUDA- PL20150001695 that the original78.28 acres should be used for density calculations, due to the Imperial Lakes PUD being approved prior to Zoning Re -Evaluation Program. Zoning: Imperial Lakes PUD (Ord. 82-081) and ST Parcels 15C & 15D Past actions: • Determination Letter 2/4/91 - exemption granted from the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance based ❑n the dedication of 50 feet of ROW along the north property line by Warranty Deed recorded in the public records of the County (for Veterans Memorial Parkway). • Resolution 97-72 - extended PUD approvat recognizing density of the PUD has previously been determined to be vested and Final Site Development Plan (FSDP) No. 89-134 • PUDA-PL20150001695 seekingto add a variety of residential unit types became inactive and did not go to hearing. This PUD Amendment is for a max. 430 multifamily units (market rate) or max. 313 single family units (market rate), and add itionaLty up t❑ 320 bonus units through the affordable housing bonuses of LDC Sec. 2.06.03. for a total maximum of 750 units. Site access is proposed from Veterans Memorial Parkway extension. Provide a PU❑ Master Plan that includes all the required information on the Master Plan as outlined in the Administrative Code for Land Development, Chapter 3, Section G.1, PU❑ Master Plan Contents (items #1 through 13). If cut de sacs are proposed in excess of 1,000 feet, deviation is needed from LDC 6.06.01.J. List the deviations in Exhibit E and indicate deviation locations with symbots on the Master Plan. Also provide a document that states the deviation along with justifications demonstrating such master plan elements may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community (LDC section 10.02.13.A.3), and/or demonstrating that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivaLent to literal application of such regulations" per 10.02.13.B.5.h.A Historical & Archeological Survey or Waiver is required. Lands to west, north and small corner of at the northwest corner of the subject site is in the County's designated area of f�G�,�.r Archeological Probability. State Master Site File #CR00737 lies along the northern edge of subject property. Ray Bellows stated during Pre Application meeting that boundary survey is not required, considering that the previously approved PUD boundary is not changing_ Note: In Exhibit F, list development commitments, do not categorize any commitments with a heading of "Other" or "Miscellaneous." A Neighborhood Information Meeting is required. See Administrative Cade, Chapter 8, B. for guidance updated per Resolution 2023-211. Two public hearings are required for PU❑ Rezones: Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners. P6 ,� N.;� ThornasClarkeVEN From: 5tephenne Barter Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2025 11:15 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: James Sabo Subject: Pre-App Meeting Notes - PL20250006588 Imperial Lakes (PUMA) Attachments: PL20250006588 - imperial Lakes (PUDA).pdf Thomas, Attached is my Pre -Application notes for the referenced petition. Stephenne Barter Planner II Zoning Office: 239-252-7707 2800 Horseshoe ❑r. Naples, Florida 34104 Stephenne.BarterCcD,coliiercountyfl .gov j& Collier County affloom Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing. Pre -Application — 7/1/2025 Stephenne Barter PL20250006588 - Imperial Lakes (PUDA) Request/Proposal: The applicant is proposing an amendment to modify the PUD to add a maximum of 430 multi -family units or a maximum of 313 single-family dwelling units and appropriate development standards. Future Land Use (FLU) designation is Urban Residential Subdistrict of the Urban Mixed -Use District. Per Ordinance 82-081, the Imperial Lakes PUD was approved for a maximum of 430 multi -family units or 5.5 DU/A in which the total dwelling count is not to exceed 430. If the applicant wishes to develop the proposed maximum of 313 single-family dwelling units, the density would be 4 DU/A (313 Dus/78.28 = 3.99 which is 4 ❑U/A allowed by the ❑ensity Rating System. There appear to be no issues with the proposed change as it relates to Comprehensive Planning, as this designation allows for residential uses, including single-family and multi -family. Please list and address Policy 5.6 and Policies 7.1-7.4 ?A, G 4-1 d Z J - ThomasClarkeVEN From: Michael Sawyer Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2025 2:36 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: LauraDeJohnVEN Subject: RE: Pre-App Notes for Imperial Lakes (PUDA)- PL20250006588 Apologies, I was working on deadlines and did not see the meeting reminder. Ptease provide the fat€awing notes to the applicant. Transportation Planning; A methodology meeting by email is required and provide a note on the TIS cover sheet that the fee will be collected at the time of PU❑ submittal. Address all transportation elements of the GMP. Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. Provide trip limit/cap Commitment based on TIS using standard language. "The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the 1TE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision ,plat approval." ADDITIONALLY, A meeting is required with County staff to discuss Veterans Memorial Parkway Phase 2, directly adjacent to this development. There are issues related to the construction timing and related concerns. Respectfully, Michael Saviyer Project Manager 11 Transportation Management Services Department Transportation Planning 239-252-2926 tilicliael.saxvveLcCvcolliercouiitvfl.gov Michael Sawyer Project Manager 11 Transportation Engineering Office:239-252-2926 Michael.Sawyer@col.liercountyfl.gov From: ThomasClarkeVEN Thomas.Clarke@coiliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2025 10.17 AM To: Michael Sawyer <Michael.Sawyer@ coIIiercountyfl.gova Cc: LauraDeiohnVEN Laura.DeJohn@coliiercountyfl.gov> Subject: Pre-App Notes for Imperial Lakes (PUDA)- 131-20250006588 Z_ Collier County nifflocom �+ (.;, %a_ C� C, Hi Mike, ThomasClarkeVEN From: Mark Templeton Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2025 3:18 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN 01 e S Subject: RE: Zoning Pre-App*E�I=1 - Imperial Lakes (PUDA) - PL20250006588 Hi Thomas, Comments forth is one below: East buffer should be all Type B. Add the 6' wide reservation area outside of the preserve on the East and include the typical mote about preserves meeting b uffer requirern en ts after removal of exotics orsupplemental planting will be provided in the 6' wide reservation area..... If the property is greater than or equal to 15 acres, the Type D buffer should be 20' wide. Mark Templeton Planner III Development Review Office:239-252-2475 2800 North Horseshoe ❑r. Naples, FL 34104 Mark.Templeton colliercountyfLgov From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Collier County UNOOM Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2025 10:28 AM To: Heidi Ashton <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; Austin Grubb <Austin.Grubb@coliiercountyfl.gov>; Claudia Carmenate Claudia.Carmenate@colliercountyfl.gov>; Jaime Cook <Jaime.Cook@colliercountyfl.gov>; Cormac Gibfin <Cormac.Giblin@coiliercountyfl.gov>; Craig Brown Craig.Brown@colliercountyfl.gov>; Daniel Turner <Daniel.Turner@cofliercountyfl.gov>; David Roe <David.Rae@colliercountyfl.gov>; Drew Cody <Drew.Cody@ coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Impact Fees <ImpactFees @colliercountyfl.gov>; James Sabo <James.Sabo@coIIiercountyf1.gov>; Jessica Constantinescu <Jessica.Constantinescu@ coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Jocelyn NageondeLestang <J.NageondeLestang@colliercountyff.gov>; Jocelyn NageondeLestang EJ.NageondeLestang@colliercountyfl.gov>; Laurie Beard <Laurie.Beard@coiliercountyfl.gov>; Lisa Blacklidge Lisa.Blacklidge@coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Maria Estrada <Maria.Est rada@coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Mark Templeton Mark.Templeton@coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Michael Sawyer <Michael.Sawyer@ coiIiercountyf1.gov>; Michele Mosca <Michele.Mosca@colliercountyfl.gov>; NaplesUnda <Linda.Naples@colliercountyfl.gov>; Parker Klopf <Parker.Klopf@coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Sally Ashkar<Sally.Ash kar@coIIiercountyfl.gov,; Sarah Harrington <Sarah.Harrington@colliercountyfl.gov>; Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>; Thomas Mastroberto <Thomas.Mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercounty€I.gov>; Stephenne Barter<Stephenne.Barter@colliercountyfl.gov>; Ray Bellows <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Zoning Pre-App RESEARCH - Imperial Lakes (PUDA) - PL20250006588 Good morning all, Please see the attached Zoning Pre-App Research for: Imperial Lakes (PUDA) - PL20250006588 Collier County 0- Meeting Notes -Continued G(TjilTl �o'5 - ['G &�Dja T-Ve W 4 h L! 7. E .7, . C W� �3S 1 �e Qa-- 'QLVKA-tL Aeu C, 6 L,, �, Tirc`r Cv rYr rrc_ li+,,r 7 0 .f - S� •! G e a x- `-e c r w F-a -� e-41#rt p}'� rt, p wvF�o.uwt�w?- Qe lLL+SG a Pa- & _)3a,� Note 1: Ifsite is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Department along with a request that the}, send us a letter or email of "no objection " to the petition. Bob Middleton R.�liddleton(d na les ov.coni ,Allyson Holland AMliolland d a les ov.com Robin Singer RShi er u;nu lest ay.cori? Erica Martin enrartinLa:!ua lesnov.c•om Nnte2: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help ojj'set the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maiWain the adopted Level 4?f Service (LOS).for public, facilities. Other fees collected prior to the issuance of a building permit include building permit reviewfees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. Pre -Application Meeting Notes 3/10/2025 Page 3 of 5 Growdl Management Community Deveiopment • Planning & Zoning 2SW North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 •239-252-2400 • %vw%r ro. I I iercou ng 11,r ❑/ ThomasClarkeVEN From: Claudia Carmenate Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2025 4:19 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Utilities Website htt s: www.coII!ercoUnt fl. ov overnment ubIic-utilities water -sewer -district en ineerin -and- p ro ect- rn an age m e nt/resou rces Claudia Carmenate Project Manager I Public Utilities Engineering & Project Management J5 Office:239-252-1335 Collier Count) J 3339 Tartiiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 91 M00 M Claudia. CarmenateCcx7cclliercountyfl.gav From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Cfarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 4.18 PM To: Claudia Carmenate <Claudia.Carmenate@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Utilities Website Hi Claudia, Could you send me that link to that Utilities website and the form you mention during the Zoning Pre-App meetings so when you mention it in the Zoom meeting 1 can send it to the applicant if applicable. Thank You, 7� �farle Operations Analyst - Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2526 Thomas Clarke Operations Analyst ❑eveloprnent Review Off ice:239-252-2526 ff Collier County ThomasClarkeVlEN From: Laurie Beard Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2025 3:22 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: Pre-App Meeting PL20250006588 Imperial Lakes (PUDA) Attachments: PU❑ monitoring pre app handout 2024.docx Fallow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged PUS Monitoring pre-app notes attached. Also, please contact Cormac Giblin to discuss the Affordable Housing option at 239-252-2450. Laurie Beard Project Manager II Development Review Ofice:239-252-5782 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 Laurie. Beard(a)colIiercountyfl.gov xs_ Collier County GEMOM Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your a -mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing. PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments; Transportation Planning " The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. PUD Monitoring "One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." Miscellaneous Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. r ThomasClarkeVEN From: Craig Brown Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2025 6:06 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN NOS FS Subject: RE. Zoning Pre-App R#SZd*C1 - imperial Lakes {PUDA) - PL20250006588 Attachments: Imperial Lakes Environmental Data PUDA.doc Thomas, Here are my notes for this one. There is an existing eagle nest so there wilt need to be an eagle management plan as part of the development commitment. The preserves will require a deviation request with justifications for the request for preservations not be interconnected. 1. Please provide Environmental Data: Please provide a FLUCFCS aerial map of the subject property please include the invasive exotic plant percentage amounts and indicate which FLUCFCS are being considered Native Vegetation. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location, and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other naturalI land features, located on abutting properties. Please provide wetland functionality scores WRAP or UMAM if they have been created and or reviewed by the D E P or SFWMD. Please provide a current Listed species survey, which should include listed plants far the subject property. Provide supporting exhibits (i.e. Panther zones ect.) be sure to include Black Bear and Florida Bonneted Bat as part of the evaluation. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03. 3. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site ❑r mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.E-D; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H.1.d-e) (25% of native vegetation is required for preservation). 4. Please address how the Proposed promect is consistent with Conservation Coastal Management Element CCME Policy 6.1 and Obiective 7.1. S. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation requirements and minimizes impacts to listed species as required in the CCME, (The preservation Requirement is 25% of native vegetation). 6. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. (If found onsite). Please address how potential listed species that may be present on Conservation Collier property (East/North) will be deterred from entering the subject property. 7. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. Environmental. Data fee $2,500. Craig Brown Manager - Environmental Services Development Review Office:239-252-2548 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Craig. Brown(7colliercountyfl. gov Collier County Uffloom From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colfiercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2025 10:28 AM To: Heidi Ashton <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; Austin Grubb <Austin.Grubb@colliercountyfl.gov>; Claudia Carmenate Claudia -Ca rmenate@col liercountyfl.gov>; Jaime Cook rJaime.Cook@colliercountyf4�gov>; Cormac Giblin <Cormac.GibIin@ccIIiercountyfl.gov>; Craig Brown <Craig.Brow n@coIIiercountyfi.gov>; Daniel Turner •Daniel.Turner@ coIIiercountyf€.gov>; David Roe < David. Roe @coIIiercountyf,.gov>; Drew Cody •Drew.Cody@coIIiercountyfl.gov>; impact Fees<ImpactFees @coIIiercopnfyfl.gov>; James Sabo games.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov>; Jessica Constantinescu <Jessica.C6nstantinescu@colliercountyfl.gov>; Jocelyn NageondeLestang <J.NageondeLestang@ coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Jocelyn NageondeLestang <J.NageondeLestang@colliercountyfl.gov>; Laurie Beard LaurieBeard@colliercountyfl.gov>; Lisa Blacklidge Lisa .Blacklidge@ colliercountyfl.gov>; Maria Estrada <Maria"Estrada@ coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Mark Templeton <Mark.Templeton@colliercountyfl.gov>; Michael Sawyer/�Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>; Michele Mosca <Michele.Mosca@colliercountyfl.gov>; NaplesLinda <Linda.Naples@col lie rcountyfl.gov>; Parker Klopf Parker.Klopf@coIIiercountyfl.gov>; Sally Ash kar <,Q61ly.Ashkar@ co11iercountyfl.gov>; Sarah Harrington <Sarah.Harrington@colliercountyfl.gov>; Sean Sarrnrnon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>; Thomas Mastrobert❑ <Thomas. Mastroberto@col liercountyfl.gov> Cc: LauraDelohnVEN Laura, DeJohn@collilercountyfl.gov>; Stephenne Barter<Stephenne.Barter@colliercountyff.gov>; Ray Bellows Ray. Bellows @ coIIiercountyfl.ggv� Subject: Zoning Pre-App RESEARCH - fcnperial Lakes (PUDA) - PL20250006588 Good morning all, ; Please see the attached Zoning Pre-App Research for: Imperial Lakes This Zoning Pre�App ZOOM meeting is scheduled for today Tuesda 7/1/2025 at 3:00 m See attached link below: Zoom Invite: Topic: Pre-App Meeting PL20250006588 Imperial Lakes (PUDA) Time: Jul 1, 2025, 03:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada) �r<1 C,� 3 �• a Environmental Data Checklist The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 1. Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. 2. WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida 3. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. 4. SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. S. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3,05.07 H have been met. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans d. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered 7. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 8. Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Identify the Iocation of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the � ('..' '5C,3. location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 9. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agEiLultural operation, provide documentation that the parce](s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parce](s) are in compliance with the I0 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06. 10. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. a. Provide descriptions of each FLUCFCS code Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. a. Demonstrate on map. b. Provide a companion chart. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 11. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 12. Where off site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05,07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off -site parcel(s) if off -site donation of land is to occur. 13. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 14. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. I5. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) a. Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. b. Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. c. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. e. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 4�A_ (, -a 3 (�_,y. 16. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PU❑ rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement {EIS} document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. Collier Countv J Zoning Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20250006588 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Mike Bosi Division Director-Planning&Zoning 252-1061 Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov LiKRay Bellows Manager — Planning & Zoning 252-2463 raymond.beliows@co11iercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Hende.rlong Zoning -Planner III 252-2464 rchard.henderlong@colliercountyfi.gov Laura DeJohn Zoning - Vendor 252-5587 Laura.dejohn@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Kelly Zoning -Planner Ill 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning - Planner 111 252-4312 timothy.finn@coiliercountyfl.gov ❑ Nancy Gund lach, AICP Zoning — Planner 111 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Eric Ortman Zoning — Planner ill 252-1032 Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sean 5ammon Zoning— Planner 111 252-8422 Sean.sammon@colliercountyfl.gov 0' Maria Estrada Zoning Planner II 252-2408 Maria Estrads@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP zoning - Planner III 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke zoning - Operations Analyst 252-2526 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Anthony Stoltz Utility Planning - Supervisor 252-5835 Anthony.stoltz@colllercountyfl.gov ❑ Drew Cody Utility Planning— Project Mgr. III 252-2917 Drew.cody@col IiercountyfLgov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 bra ndi.pollard@ col I lerco u ntyf Lgov Claudia '��' Zw s "� Utility Planning — Project Mgr. 1 252-2917 Dr-�y@cal IiercountyfLgov LI 5hon Fandrich Utilities -Project Mgt -Supervisor 252-8835 Shon.fandrich@colliercountyfi.gov _ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baiuch@colliercountyfl.gov I_I Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov Michael Gibbons Structural/Resident Plan Review 252-2426 michae!.gibbons@coiliercountyfl.gov L Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring -Project Mgr. II 252-5782 laurie.beard@colfiercountyfl.gov U Sean Lintz Battalion Chief - N. Collier Fire 597-9227 slintz@northcoliierfire.com 0 Bryan Horbal Captain — N. Collier Fire 552-1367 Bryan.horbal@colliercountyfl.gov FFf' Daniel Turner Plan Examiner - N. Collier Fire 252-2521 Daniel.turner@colliercountyfl.gov L%' Linda Naples Sr. Plan Examiner — N. Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.napies @col lie rcountyfi.gov Shar A. Beddow Dep. Fire Marshal - Gr Naples Fire 241-1422 sbeddow@gnfire.org Thomas Mastroberto Gr. Naples Fire Site Plans Rev. III 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov PJ James Sabo, AICP GMP, Comp Planning Manager 252-2708 james.sabo@colliercountyff.gov Lir Parker Klopf GMP—Comp Planning— Planner III 252-2471 Parker.klopf@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Malloy GMP-Comp Planning -Planner 11 252-4329 Jessica.malloy@coiliercountyfl.gov Stephen ne Barter GMP—Comp Planning — Planner II 252-7707 Stephenne.barter@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Austin Grubb GMP—Comp Planning— Planner III 252-2834 Austin.Grubb@coIIiercountyfl.gov Pre -Application Meeting Notes 3/10/2025 Page 4 of 5 Growth Management Community Development • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 2 39-252.2400 1 WM., iercouni 1 rovI Collier County J ❑ Michele Mosca,A1CP Community Development 252-2834 Michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov Planner III Craig Brown Environmental Review -Mgr. 252-2548 craig.brown @coiliercountyfLgov ❑ Alexandra Mitchel Environmental Specialist 252-2907 Alexandra.Mitchel@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ David Roe Environmental Specialist 252-2915 David.Roe@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Lauren Murray Environmental Specialist 252-2306 Lauren.murray@colliercountyfl.gov _ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision Vend. 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov Jocelyn Nageon De Lestang,P.E. Engineering -5tormwater 252-2434 Jocel n.Na eondeLesta ngft cc) liiercount fl, ov Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack.mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov Matt McLean, P.E. Division Director - IF, CPP & 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov PM Cormac Giblin, AICP Division Director— 252-2460 Cormac.giblin@coil iercountyfLgov Economic. Dev. & Housing ❑ Sarah Harrington Manager— Planning 252-4211 Sarah.harrington@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Division Director- 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov Development Review ❑ Lisa 6lacklidge Development Review 252-2758 Lisa.blacklidge@cclliercountyfl.gov Manager- Planning Li Christine Willoughby Planner Ill 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brett Rosenblum-P.E. Development Review— 252-2905 Brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov Supervisor Pro'ect M r. Mark Templeton Landscape Review— Planner Ill 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov J Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov Ll Gino Santabarbara Impact Fees — Planner [II 252-2925 Gino.santabarbara@colliercountyfl.gov J Diane Lynch Management Analyst I 252-4283 diane.iynch@colliercountyfi.gov LJ Renald Paul Program Coordinator 252-2443 Renaid.pauf@colliercountyfl.gov Ll Connie Thomas Client Services -Supervisor 252-6369 Cons uela.thomas@colFercountyfLgov J Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov Ll Derek Perry Assistant County Attorney 252-8066 Derek.perry@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email jnu�.r'� r tft-h n.or—. W14rN4-A&,AOo tD t iL+G�1 duN�+aV, CY 1G LAW Pre -Application Meeting Notes 3/10/2025 5of5 Growth Management Community Development • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104. 239-252.2400 • col liercokip ytl,go_I Pre-App Zoom Attendance: Meeting Date: 7 aaaday 7/1/2.Q25 at ❑aM Irn trial. Lak _dAj- PL20250006588_ Planner: Laura De ohn 4S Participants (16) — ❑ x Q Find a participant thomasciarkeven (Me) !/ Craig Brown 0 CDJ aLauraDeJohnVEN 0 0 Richard's Wad 4 vsurripenhour D Cs; 0 Beard_I ClaudiaCarmenate 0 Daniel Turner. NCFR f vestradamaria CDq lantzlorraine LindaNaples V- 0 MarkTempleton 133 0 Parker Kopf C-.0 0 Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager aStephenne.Barter (/ 0 Tim Hail C r Gam--- y Growth Management Community Development Dept. ZONING STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING Meeting Date: Tuesday 7 1 2025 at 3:00 m ZOOM Zoning Operations Staff : Thomas Clarke Imperial Lakes PUDA - PL20250006588 Planner: Laura DeJohn • Applicant Submitting Request: GradyMinor—Sharon Umpenhour 239-947-1144 sumpenhour@gradyminor.com ■ Agent to list for PL# GradyMi nor — D. Wayne Arnold AICP • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) N A Realty Trust Inc. Parcel # 00153160004 ■ Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: Amendment to Imperial Lakes PU❑ (PUDA) Is Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): Maximum 313 Single Family Dwelling Units at 4 d/u per acre • Details about Project: Proposed amendment to modify the PUD to add single family dwelling units and appropriate development standards. the amendment is also intended to correct a scrivener's error that did not remove the "ST" Overlay from the County zoning map, even though the PUD Ordinance states it was removed. Cancellation & Reschedule Requests: Contact: Client Services Email: g►ndclientservices colliercountyfi gov Phone: 239-252-1036 May 15, 2025 Location: G:�CDES Planning Services\Current\Zonirig Staff Information Meru IM P L5P•gxh C MCP i14_ x f Create � ❑ X toms Fdit Convert t-Sign Rnd text artods Q a i;)D. !� Q" s.7 ROADWA) E.►sa11- :1 r❑ Ok x-fl .PG laf 1 Ofi;JaPOP 13AND OR'+_PG_'1 U 7TS>� i 1-r m �-n'1KSCAFE 11 1 AA ITER $' 'a1:�. A n-n i R I R k =-.,. _ Tom• `II r `���f }•� R IS WD—t MG A O ate AIDS aC>~:FIS A taC- 4 CAME von AT "MLAL P n L>=MND I� DFVL'iTIOV r+9s'iIIwew �35�G sn Dis.4i'�A� ��sFs�V'F ZOADA:'1'i AS��`�� �RiLtiAGE E AMI—IT� 3 R RESiD NFI;i o1e sau watt va,a wa: a: v :kA ANfL-.% AREA OR •tiiGPt3 L LAKE I0117D CK > r P PRESERVE aYrPs u CUES CILT- �r�T trL'I1119T n ... w IYPERlA7. r,nwS 1PF'G7 •� -SM PLAN AD ry 4 d C—z L Sw •N 4knlwh Imperial Lakes RPUQ Location Map ALIM� [nr cur. i3�/f .+, D a q q ii o-� L T Mi N b a I � Q C � e®� sass DAT.1 T07AL517E ARF.L 76311 AG MsWENITAL 48.43l AC E63%] AMUNnAREA L65eACEPW4 FRESERri 14.T3YAC{1.9W WAT(R}IANACEMEM 11 DDk AC[T4%) MAi1SlHM MVAS.[NG UNTS ISM NOF1:5± A_wD 311 MULTI-FA.WLl': 4X 6,6 DUMC1 • SEE NOTES SINGLEFAMLY. 313C40DOIAC] 5EEN07E3 An(mmRI.F- BOMBING 75G 0 7e DUµC) WE Nfl'T'E ± ME"i REQUIKV>'-3.9IS ACRES fSS.W_ AMES NATIVE r'EGEIATM Y_55i1 PRODDED: I 5411 ACRES 6^ pRvnDlu 6mr OEMATIUN$ 1- kmLBEF FPDM LDC SECTRH E06.0I. •STREET MSTEM ermUU1 VrS• AND APPE! um E. 71PlCAL S WM SECTIONS AND RI6d1T-OF-WAl DESIGN 5TAFDA WS' THE LDC EMABLLSHE] A YA[iNUM ✓Sa lODT RIGHT OF%%AY k7DT4 MR LOCAL SfREEn THI& OEr7ATIOF PROPOSES TO JNVEAD ALLOW FOR PRIVATE ROADS MTFNIN THE $Tff TO BE LCKAMD IN A SO FOOT trTDEACCE3S E.TSEML4T OR RIGF70F WRY. AEdEF FROM LSO SP.C•EIOX 1.oM7 AS. -ME51.RVATTWI STAHDARIIS. N7ITGN I EUgUMES PRESERVATION AREAS SHALL BE JNTERGONPECTFD "TT IB! THE SITE AND SO AUIOPSM OFT -SITE PRESERVATION AREAS OR NILOUFE CfWRH)ORS TO INSTc ALIAAti THE 0nsm PRLSEIam TO BE NON-CONTI000U5 YOTfi I. ALL AREAGM p3 UT PRESERVE ARE AP"MIMATE A.YD RHHECT TO MOOMC.A71% AT ME TIM OF 5DP OR FLAT AFPRul'AL LN ACLDRD0.YCE WITH THE EDL THE PAO]ECT TS LIMITED TO A MAMMOAI OF 43D MM.LLNG UNITS. 11HLLS6 THE DEVELOPER ELECTS TO CONSTRICT ON -SITE AFFORDABLE HOUSING- Ip A}7:ORDASLE HOUSING UNITS ARE DEVELOPED. THE MAgMU31 TOTAL WMBER OF DIrTLLIN6 BITS YERMITTEDN7THINTNF. MMTDSHALL UE nO IA%Tla,YOlII�TM AFFORDABLE ONTLlR70 UKITS MUST Be PROWDED IR ACCCIRDANCE IVITK IDC SECTION :D6. AFPORDAEU KOti % OEHS[TY WHIM AFTf THE LTOOML' AND DENSITY RO!IHSES PAOVLDED P< IBC SECTHM 7A 03, TA4UA. 3, ANY EOMBIHATIOK OF MLILTT-EAMPLY AND SIMAL FAMILY %M To E EEu THE FRIp OAP LY FXIHBIT'P. TRANWMATIUb COMMIPMENT. ITEJM C_ �C]!'•M1Itl10: _ _ fYAlw:tf u8 r ercn . y,�'.� - � .. —_ Cobh Yf3at• Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G.2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 GA of the Administrative Code The following submittal requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please upload the submittal items with cover sheets attached to each section via the GMCD Portal. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted, or processed. View sample PUD document. REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with narrative statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary Completed application with required attachments (download latest version) Q� Pre -application meeting notes Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized Pro e rty Ow;ne rs h ip Disclosure Form Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control Com P leted Add ressin Checklist (no older than 6 months) X Warranty Deed(s) Signed and sealed Boundary Survey (n❑ older than 6 months) Architectural rendering of proposed structures X Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 0 ❑ Statement of utility provisions Li Statement of compliance with Growth Management Plan Environmental data requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. See Chapter 7 A. of the Administrative Code ® ❑ Listed or protected species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. ❑ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Historical and Archaeological Survey or Waiver X School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable with residential uses X Location of existing public facilities that will serve the PUD N Electronic copy of all required documents Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additionai information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) Q ❑ Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and one (1) 8 %2' x II" copy 0 ❑ *Checklist continues on next page PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PURR) 4122124 Page 9 of 11 Original PLED document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD Q ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined ❑ Development Commitments (infrastructure and related matters) Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 7C +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: ■ Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses • Exhibit B: Development Standards Table for each type of land use • Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code • Exhibit D: Legal Description • Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each • Exhibit R List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed [Ise] Receiving Laird Areas, pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08 A.2.a.(2)(b)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: 0 School District (Residential Components); Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nicole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Anthony Stolts Parks and Recreation Director: Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay El Water/Sewer District: 0 Stormwater Management: ❑ Fire: City of Naples Planning Director; Erica Martin Other: ❑ City of Naples Utilities: ❑ Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS ® Fire Pre -Application Meeting: $150.00 (Applied as credit towards fire review fee upon submittal of application if within 9 months of the pre-app meeting date) ® Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 ® PUD Rezane: $10,000.00* plus $25,00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 ® Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet {submittal determined at pre -application meeting}: $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 ] Transportation Review Fees: • Methodology Review: $500.00 (Methodology by Email to Staff) *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting • Minor Study Review: $750.00 • Major Study Review $1,500.00 PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PURR) 4/22/24 Page 10 of 11 Fire Planning Review Fee: ($300 PUDZ, PUDR) ($150 PUDA) Estimated Legal Advertising fee: • le , CCPC: $ �• 0 00 ■ 6CC: $500.00 If applicable, an additional fee for Property Owner Notifications will be billed to the applicant after Hearing Examiner hearing date. (Variable) ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: • Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School district incoordination with the County All fees are collected at the time of application, Property Notification letters, if required by The Land Development Code, will be invoiced after the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the Sth and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to. Growth Management Community Development Department I GMCD Public Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.govlcityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDc#ientservices colliercount i. ov w Signature of Petitioner or Printed Na6ed of Signing Party Date PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 11 of 11 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20250006588 1 Joseph Livio Parisi (print name), as Vice President (title, If applicable) of N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner0 applicant=contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Q. Grady Minorand Associates, LLC and Coleman, Yovanovich R Koester, P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee': • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of 19physical presence or 0 online notarization this -day of 20 25 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Joseph Livio Parisi as Vice President Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Eff Are personally known to me ® Has produced a current drivers license ® Has produced as identification. Notary Signature: 12L"- Y CP108-COA-001151155 REV 3/4/2020 Notary Public State of Florida �1 Aaron A. Hask 1� 111» My Commission HH 635291 Expires 2/212029 Cote er County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov ww.colliercountyfl.gov PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. Realty Trust, Inc., 8156 Fiddler's Creek Parkway, Naples, FL 100 34114 Aubrey J. Ferrao, Director, President (Ownership Interest) Also see attached Annual Report If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. 01/2023 Page 1 of 3 Cottle' r County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov ww.colliercountyfl.gov e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, includingthe officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, orpartners: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, ortrust: Name and Address N.A. g. Date subject property acquired 1988 ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: 01/2023 Page 2 of 3 Cote er County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov ww.colliercountyfl.gov on reauired to have Property Ownership Disclosure. will not be accepted without this form. Reauirements I AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION I for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, 1 attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. 1 understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *The completed appli(ation, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal: littps;//cvl)ortal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityvie%-jwel) Questions? Email: GMDclientseryices@colliercountyfl.gov June 10, 2025 Agent/Owner Signature Date D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Agent/Owner Name (please print) 01/2023 Page 3 of 3 COVENANT OF CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Imperial Lakes PUD (Parcel ID #00153160004) Petition Number PL20250006588 (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in ExhibitA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Residential planned unit development ( R PUD) zoning. We hereby designate,' Wa Y h Kces� 1e9'" , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Si ature of Owner Signature of Owner Joseph Livio Parisi, as Vice President of N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. Printed Name of Owner Printed Name of Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of 91 physical presence or ❑ online notarization this day of 20 25 by Joseph Livio Parisi, as Vice President of N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. who is 21personally known to me or ❑ has produced as identification. l Notary Public State of Florida Aaron A. Haak Sign re of No Pu711/ +III My commission HH 635291 Expires 212/2029 /f/y) 1. Print Name of Notary Public PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 8 of 11 Imperial Lakes RPUD (PL20250006588) Exhibit A Legal Description THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHEAST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY OVER AND UNDER THE SOUTH THIRTY FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 10, AND ALSO ON, OVER AND UNDER THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH THIRTY FEET OF SAID SECTION 15 EXTENDING FROM THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) TO THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF SECTION 15 LESS ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND ALSO ON, OVER, AND UNDER A STRIP OF LAND SIXTY FEET IN WIDTH LYING THIRTY FEET ON EACH SIDE OF A LINE COMMON TO THE NORTH ONE-HALF AND THE SOUTH ONE- HALF OF THAT PORTION OF SAID SECTION 15 LYING EAST OF U.S. HIGHWAY 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) RIGHT- OF-WAY EXCEPT THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, ALL LYING AND BEING IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. June4, Zozs 0GradyMinor Exhibit Legal Description. docx Page 1 of I a once-nAwsau company Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engincering@gradyminor.com • www.gradymJnor.com Collier County Addressing Checklist GMCD Public Portal Land Development Code Administrative Code Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with a * are required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Applicant Contact Information *Name of Owner/Agent: Sharon Umpenhour Firm [if agent]: Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC *Address: 3800 Via Del Rey *Telephone: (239) 947-1144 *City: Bonita Springs Cell: *E-Mail Address: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Location Information *State: FL *ZIP: 34134 Fax: *Folio (Property ID) Number(s) of the subject property or properties [Attach list if necessary]: 00153160004 *Legal Description of subject property or properties [Attach list if necessary]: S 15 T48 R25 Street Address(es) where applicable, if already assigned: Not assigned Addressing Checklist 6/14/2024 Page 1 of 2 Growth Management Community Development • Operations & Regulatory Management 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104. 239-252-2400 • www.colliercountyflgov/ Collier County Project Information Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre -approval of project name and/or street name may be requested by contacting us at GMD Addressing (cDcolliercountyfl.gov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. Current Project Name: Imperial Lakes PUD Proposed Project Name: N.A. Proposed Street Name: N.A. Latest Approved Project Number [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] N.A. Submittal Requirement Checklist Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include. Checkmark the items included with this application: Requirements for Review: Required: LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. ❑x List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. ❑ E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre -approved project and/or street names. ❑ The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMCD Portal: https://cvportal.col liercountyfl.gov/citvviewweb Questions? Email: Front. Des k(a)colIiercountyfl.gov Addressing Checklist 6/14/2024 Page 2 of 2 Growth Management Community Development • Operations & Regulatory Management 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104. 239-252-2400 • www.collicrcountyf1.�ov/ ((J► IN Ttll: '1WL3N(__*"t'Il JUDIC11h CIItCUI'P IN AND KUIt (�l lat (ll )l iPtl'Y, V I 1 1It I I H1 RCC o ° PRM sr-0 v Laws of r-lorida, 1971, Chapter 28093 DO C N f Z44A0 Section 702.02 (4) , Florida Statutes 1971 lade CD l 4rocorrect uproperty ndescription.✓ T w ANNE ELIZABETH NORTH ) plaintiff o vs CASE NO. 87-0178-CA-01-HDH In w CKT INVESTMENTS, INC., FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, ) � etc . , etal .— r ^, Defendant n — � �1 N 0 i ! 9 7 40 ° 1388 JUL i � pal 12: 13 ��JpICATE OP TITU-" / �•riECORDEt� V COLLIER COUNTY r� r t— Ln c-:1 Cn M _ w 0 o C) U O to d* T$ The tu)de.rsigned, JAMES C. GILFS, Clark of the Court, certi fits tlwt tw executed and filed a certif cate._pf sale in this action on June 22nd tl'19 88,for the propRt� scAb �J4 e,and that no ot.�je�ctitans to tie_ sa]t� iulvt� time all forLCo,ty,, n+ obiva ions. been filed within t� — �rt llic r t F]crid,i: The folla+iing ProFx. q etr of Section 15, Township The East and-haf of o cn 48 South, Rapge'02 togher with an easement for under die Souk th k,y egtOf the Southeast one -quarter roadway over,, and of Section 1( �d also on, over end 'l nde�7 ­, t portion of the North thirty feet of id Section 15 d f om the East right-of-way line of U.S. 41 (T Trail) to the E t �ondary line of Section 15 less Atlantic Coastu.r, 4lroad ri h�-o and also on, over, and under gh a strip of land sixty'e Aw' feet on each side of a line common to the Noma 6 Z11-'and the South one-half of that portion of said Section 15 lying East of U.S. Highway 41 (Tamiami Trail) right -of- o way except the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad right-of-way, all lying and being in Collier County, Florida. , cs was sold tO N.A. REALTY TRUST, INC. ~ 6101 Pelican Bay Blvd., Naples, Florida 33963 o WITNESS My hand and seal of the court on July 6th , 19_88,_. '• • r. M 238 137992 TIC DIED DEED made this 4(,7 by Traverse Cprporat corporation Incorporated and existing under the laws of the !hate of Florida '­4T " whose post office address Is 365 Fifth Avenue South. I a$, Florida Inafter called the Grantor) to the grantees hereinafter named, whose post' on,glyd. nd,Rap�48. Michigan 49506., office address Is 928 Princeton S. E. ra 4 WITNESS I T 4 The,Grantor, In consideration of-,the%sum of Ton Dollars and other good i and valuable considerations, the recelpt;y"mof-vis cknowledgedp1hb .... rantsi.kargaInsi.sells, transf hereby A ars and convoys M.,an u n d 1,4 1 d a d 3/4 Inter t .... In the following described lands,to.Loonard 0sterink,and,JanIce F , UP' . husband ,and wife, and their heIrss succat.sars,.and assigns. divided. 1/4 ',interest In the following described lands to Bruce J. Osterink and Margo J. OstorInk. husband and wife, and their,,heirso-successors.and The West -half (WI).of the Northeast quor ter (NEI). except,,At lent le Coast Line Railroad Alght-of-way In Soctlon 15i Township 48 Southo Range 25 East, ubjgc'j',to­inid'together with (and the Grantor her:by rasarvess excepts, : In favor of the Grantor rants and declares) an easement for roadway signs and 9 successors and as and Grantee. and their respective heirs, also In favor of all current owners of butting land and the public on over, and under :,:trip of land sixty (60) feet In width, lying S S2 I thirty (30) feet On h side of section I thir Ins. of Sections 10 and 15 lying East of U. S. Hlghviaya-41,��rlot�,t-cf-way,ex-, cept the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad right -of! we and also is strip of land nd sixty (60) feet In width lying thirty (301 feet on each side ,of a line common to the Nurth-half (NO and South -half ($I) of that portion of Section 15 lying East of U. , Sright-of-way, mlghway 41 right-of-way except xcept.the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad gh t -of4aj, all being In Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier Cjunty, Florida. 4 TOGETHER wiWall tonements'i rten hereditaments and,appu 'ihiei"'ind,a I ' ""I , , V . A, rights, powers, privileges, titles, Interests. eitMOS,�-roiirslons. remainders easem I an ts, and'.r I - pirlan and littoral rights thereto belonging or In any wise per- i taming. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. SUBJECT to any oil, gas or mineral leases or Interests of record, and to any'" rights of way,. easements or, conveyances of record or4 t hot an accurate Sur Tslaor,- ",,Z, _iq­� 46 4i r railroads. I road$ f -mi, Inspectlo" would disclose for roads* construction of oads public utilities, telephone and power lines. borrow pits, outfoll dltc'�es and dralnsqsq,'�' A0 K. P 7-.;- MLP. V, s N 4S �« 238 nrt 914 ' STAT0e►FLOF�It�A CU�7cNYTAs'Nga"4SO0g T ! tMt2t{7�ie �xoa>Ana(>I�aoaxtoaxeha(xb(a�aoaaaaaoc i IN VIThiSS 1.'}�I•iEOFA the Orantor has signeds sealsd and delivered this deed the day and year first above mentioned. II i Signed, scaled and deli- TRAVERSE CDRPOP..ITICN vered in our presences Bye Via President ► a c i -may ATTEBT s ' Secretary STATE OF FLORI111 ) i' s.• , I r COUNTT OF coyT=R) �•, IA an officer authorised to tale acknowledgments of deeds according to the laws of the State of Florida, duly qualified and acting# . hereby certify that E. N. Parker; and George K. Wall respectively, as Vice President and Secretary of Traverse Corporation, W ® Boa = C W to me personally known, this day acknowledged before me that they executed rn o CD -Z c the foregoing deed as such officers of said corporations and that they affixed o0 a -r, thereto the official goal of said corporation{ and I further certify that I v o n n M O making said acknowledgments to be the individuals de- D r- p )MOW the said persons 0 . scribed in and who executed the said deed.Fm 1 YJJa t' a v IN tilITkiESS k1kiEREOFA I have hereunto not gT hand and official 19 seal�.hls ��� day of ���'i 67. QJ i C) g r� s Tyr E FLOPIDA •<� L Notary PYb110 r� DOCUw.E21T,.^r STAMP tAY, _ 4 v tir2re�/rrY"s t `. ' 9 RolAsn ronK saAn os noeo� r Wit 3 C 0= / YT COMMISSION tiFl4LS A►L-11. Ili? � "4 •� .w..M� .M. �. M/K1..MA• . „.. 004�1 ROWAN soft M COLLIER COUNTY. /LMDA "An"RaT T. e0017 - 01A e1 on" ago FFU pit 242 251 - 140051 Jv,19 10 07 AN'67 rT.SCOiT Ci • r• u1T Count bi.;ES ,-OJSIf. FLORIDA ;- s:ade this JI. A.'& �J IY67 by Evernie Corporation, a corporation incorporated and Wdsiiog under the laws of the 1' Stata of Florida, whose poet office address is 365 Fifth !revue South, Naples, Florida (hereinafter ctlled the Grantor) to Leven S. North, Sr. and Anne Elizabeth North, his WIN 1307 Felton Court Lutherville, Maryland (hereinafter called the Grantee). 3. 11 I T N E S S 15 T H s s Grantor, in consideration of the suss of Ten Dollars and other good and valua'.ls considerations, the receipt whereof is hereby aolmowledged, hereby grants, barEains, sells, transfer and conveys to the Grantee, and the Grantee's heir&, eucceesorr and assigns, the following described lands situate, lying and being in Cal Iler County, State of Fioridat The East-heif (Q) of the Northeast quarter (N°}) of Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, subject to and together with (and the Grantor hereby declares) an easement for roadway in favor of reserves, excepts, grants and the Grantor and the Grantee and their respective heirs, s4ccessors, and assigns and also in favo- of all current owners of abutting lands and the public on, (30) feet of the Southeast quarter (SE}) of over and under the South thirty Section 10, and also on, over and under that portion of the North thirty (30) feet of said Section 15 extending from the east right-of-way line of U. S. #41 (Taniani Trail) to the East boundary line of Section 15 less Atlantic Coast Line R.ilroad right-of-way, and also on, over, and under a strip of land sixty (60) feet In width lying thirty (30) feet on each side of a line T common to the North -half (NO and the South -half (Si) of that portion of said Section 15 lying East of U. S. Highway #41 (Tamiaml Trail) right-of-way except the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad right-0-way. TOGS:h'Fai with all tenements, hersditaments and appurtenances, mad all rights,', powers, privileges, titles, interests, estates, reversiono, remainder&, easements, and ripariaa mad littoral righte thereto belonging or in wW vies pertaining. TO HAVE AN'D TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. SUMCT to any oil, gas or mineral leases or interests of record, and to arr rights of way, ease wrte or (conveyances of record or that an accurate surrey or inspection would disclose for reads, construction of roads, railroads, public utilities, telephone and power lines, borrow pits, cutfall ditches and drainage. r, Pill, cu cr cvt tr.''ul ;�curcCA t �� �• :f aEc 242 ma 252 irzmTXKLNNXINXiK/Xlk1II2NfItlIYX2lIlI> In r. III WITNESS W"MZOF, the Orantor has signed, sealed and delivered this deed the day end year first above rAntioned. , Signed, sealed and deli— vered in our presences i EVERNIA CORPORATION 1�ys Vice President ATTESTi i J -,J 4+ a �G ' ► Secretary STATE OF FLORML COOA'I'Z OF COMM U' I, an officer authorized to take acknowledgments of deeds .'�• `�' ' according to the laws of the State of Florida, duly qualified and acting, hereby certify that E. N. Parker abd George K. Mall respectively, as Vice President and Secretary of Evernla Corporation, to as persona.117 known, this day acknowlolrad before me that they executed the foregoing deed as such officers of said corporation, and that they affixed thereto the official seal of said corporation) and I further certify that I know the said persons making said acknowledgments to be the individuals de— scribed in and who executed the said deed. Ili UITIMS IWIMREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal this A) f� '' day of X ' e , 19 c� 7 STATE: - FL0R'fBA u�:: 0OCU.%'=,_ ?_FT4t�0 TA J � � ,: tills%! • lti' 9;005 IDA y { �� ?`i 1✓ TV 4A1 phis is a tie and coat C e� �t 1t rF �' tt the -OFFICIAL �. - tECgS my hand _ ano oEial DWo r j Notary Public NOTARY ►Otl1c.:TAT, of /IORI/� AT NO Mr CO ,v1S; ox C7p1RES Art 17 u vvvnv i..w...wu r,. . N71 r erv.r�.N���t•.,, �� r Mw.... 1. Oarr..l *~ft 0"6 of 609AM9 DOWN". ne.ra MA"IkRCT T. =" Curt A MCNA CW 5CP 00842235 1983NOV 16 PH 2257 W ARRANI'Y OECD .RAMCa FORM 37 irstom `aRnORATraN' COLLIER COUNTY RECORDED This 10arranty ]Deed 4\111de (furl executed file 9 slay D. to 6? l,y IMPERIAL LAKE, INC, a Florida corporation a corpornlio n existing under llte lmas of FLORIDA and having its principal pince of business of Route 2, Box 1704, Naples, Florida 33940 hereinafter caller) tire grantor, to COLLIER COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, a whose postoffice address Is 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 33962, a C hereinafter called the grnutee: G I N'h rnrr nrd herein the term+ ..rann,r" nd "at ntre" inrlu it ail the Parties to this 'mamnent and the brio, Irral rrpreuntati.o and arum. of individuals, and the surcnenn and in of rmpantiom) bitneWth: Thal flat, grantor, for and in consideration of llte stun of S 1.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged. 6y these presents does grant, bargnln, sell, alien, remise, release• convey and ronfirm unto fhe grantee, all flint certain land siluafe In County, Florida, viz: The North 50 feet of: The East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 15, 'township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, subject to and together with all easements for roadways (the above referenced North 50 feet includes an already existing 30 foot road right—of—way easement with reference to O.R. Book 242, Page 251, Public Records, Collier County, Florida). "lopSubject to all asn�, rgtcs, and reservations of record b \. Together tell all wise appertaining. To Vaue at�d t a F Rnd tie prang beg, v simple; Iltal it hasopgk,, rl rants llte title to Sanl'ik lafl� aid that said land t Urea all encumbrances belonging or in any- w4irk, it'W lawfully �seized of said land in feo and only sar%lan►1; Ibot it hereby fully war- inst l ai+,..1aiYTfu1 c tms of all persons whomsoever: cei� l octiitory Stamp Tax ") a bunty, Florida r rxi J. Reon,Clerk" A M te n $$ 1� RI1,,:� "11t I grantor has caused these presents to (CORPORATE SEAL) Y "+:,� • n hr r.Yt c'htJ.c ; it ins Jrarrir, gpdwils corporate sent to be hereunto affixed, by its V, 11 proper of firers Ihrreunlo duly authorized, llte day (still year first above written. ATTEST:....................................................................... IMPERIAL LAF,E, IN . Secretary ..................... �............ ....... ............... .................. .Signed, stale(] 1 delivered in (he pmsertce of: \� NDy'Pau1.......Tl.......n ...:.................... r P + STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER I HEREBY CERTIFY that on thi+ tar, helurr me, an officer duly authorised in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, .. 14 fi.,,.11y ape .... d PAUL E. TOPPINO wrli•knvKn%b meto be the ]'resident and regseairely of the corporation named allNrantnr In, the Torntyirut 'deed, and that they se+.nlly .cknowlydged executing the mine in the presence of two .ulmFibing witnesses freely and vnlunlarily. e+•'.siarlrr •asiihnritr duly voted in them by said corporation and that the seal affixed thereto is the true corporate seal d laid emenratiun. C ' WITNESS Jar hand and oIri,i.1 ..I in the County and State last aforesaid this / day of �(/Ul�E7 %�E�.' . A. D. 19 83 f 7JI& lbsiruferia prrpnrrrf Gy: ✓ p !1W/fJi NDIART PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA n NY C0NNJ551 ONXP, OCT A, 1987 HOW IHRU GENERAL INS. UND. B �• 1 C 0 fT co rn xY�F,�ry '.' jam. J�. ^•, ��, ..( p.:- i k. .;1:.• EG� DOC INT iel= YR. ruce Anew prcpued by: �'EP (0 f H 23 o n; van A;,uerNV.m.doe S Benton. P.A. 0 1 7 3 9 4 3 9 801 eOak Drive, suite 700 COLLIER COUNTY RECORDED Naples, Fl Florida 77%7 (817) 597.21114 DRAINAGE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 27 day of January , 1993, by and between IMPERIAL GOLF CLUB, INC., a Florida Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "IMPERIAL"), and N.A. C �L REALTY TRUST, INC., a Florida Corporation (hereinafter referred to _, as "REALTY TRUST"). cc ao O O rn RECITALS 7X 4+' A. There presently exists a drainage easement recorded in Official Record Book 808, Pages 1897-1898, Official Records of Collier County, Florida, which easement was granted to Collier County, Florida, by the predecessor in interest of both IMPERIAL and REALTY TRUST to provide for drainage easement discharge and storage rights from the real property now owned by REALTY TRUST onto the real property now owned by IMPERIAL; B. Said drainage easement is not now being utilized by o either REALTY TRUST or Collier County, Florida; o o C. Both IMPERIAL and REALTY TRUST desire to relocate said m drainage easement and Collier County, Florida has requested that v• IMPERIAL and REALTY TRUST enter into this Agreement to agree to relocate said easement prior to issuance of certain development approvals by Collier County to REALTY TRUST; NOW, THEREFORE, II4P�Rn�Y TRUST agree as follows: 1. The above "�tcsiare trues inorporated by reference herein as a part 9 t �s Agreement. 2. Subject recorded in Of tic County Public," Re Agreement, IMP RIP easement for pu referenced in th property descrl1 incorporated by,., easement. Said attached hereto 4. TRUST to dischar4 described in Exh: :o 1 e a 51 v , in,„ Ex ri dAt2whidl ference herein,4, inc .sement shall b 'I -in chibit "B" . Sal dV,�s store surface a Maintenazlc� easement shall be °'-thleJ*e'sPP-P-9..? "" successors and assigns* sw , t e "existing easement ag�s 897-1898, Collier oI1,� execution of this � , , r.un%y a new drainage iie I drainage easement a ci !across the real -4s at ached hereto and ud�r) I a sketch of the sqb' stdntially the form (at,/Ahall enable REALTY can the real property reponsibility for said of REALTY TRUST or its 3. Upon execution of this Agreement, REALTY TRUST shall, at its own cost and expense, petition Collier County, Florida to abandon the existing drainage easement and to accept a new drainage easement over and across the real property described in Exhibit "A". IMPERIAL shall join in the petition with REALTY TRUST, at REALTY TRUST'S cost and expense, and execute all documents deemed necessary by Collier County or REALTY TRUST to effectuate this Agreement. REALTY TRUST, its successors and assigns, shall indemnify and hold IMPERIAL harmless and free from any liability, expenses or damages resulting from the easement. Use, maintenance and repair of the easement shall not interfere with normal golf course use and REALTY TRUST shall reimburse IMPERIAL for damages if it does. 4. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between IMPERIAL and REALTY TRUST and may not be modified except in writing signed by both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, IMPERIAL GOLF CLUB, INC. and N.A. REALTY TRUST, INC., have executed this easement as of the day and year first above written. Iy- 1?3 - 00-5- CC, 9/7/43 ;� �,', �•'* toasy11,��" u��"� �,apf*L.4� pit p Witnesses: Signature Nurse Printed i "",/" l " Signature Nurse Printed Wi se si .�oNnature 04 N hg �� a Printed n ure Nurse Printed STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE ME, an offi last aforesaid to tale" day personally appe#"c as President of WEIR� me well known and/'knhi the for,,6goi'iid me that he/she bxee expressed. WITNESS MY napal'an- STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 1864 000448 OR BOOK PAGEy IMPERIAL GOLFS,'SUB, INC. a Florida C p ra do By: Prins N.me. FRANK J. BRINKMAN Its: PRESIDENT (CORPORATE SEAL) N.A. REAETY TRUST, INC. a Flo d Co pora�,injl By: Print Name: Aub a Fe a0 Its• President FRANK J. GOLF CLUB, INC., o me_ to be the p -.cl (instrument f ojfi�i4 dki pa, i1 Notary 'ub1F Print Name°,,.,> (CORPORATE SEAL) in the state and County administer oaths, this 3brida Corporation, Lo on described in and who Fwlelged to and before ,r,the, purposes therein OR FLORIDA. M March J , 1"S. .IC UNDUBMUTER& of BEFORE ME, an officer duly authorized in the state and County last aforesaid to take acknowledgments and administer oaths, this day personally appeared AL)&egq FEgago I as President of N.A. REALTY TRUST, INC. a Florida Corporation, to me well known and known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to and before me that he/she executed said instrument for the purposes therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and official se is day of , 1993. Notary u is Print Name Commission Number 20881M NOTARY PL'&LIc St*t6 of IFLONIDA _ NY COMISSI011 T.RF. 11AX. 5,1994 WINDED TNP.0 (2112RAL JN,^. CND. -2- V i N x O .4 43 a Q 0 1864 000449 JR BOOK PAGE NWTH LINE SE 1/4 SEC 15-45-25 HMA FILE NO. 68.46 FEBRUARY 15, 1990 DRAINAGE EASEMENT v 15' D.E. A strip of land 15 foot wide located In the Southeast Quarter of a Section 15. Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, a Florida being further described as follows Commence at the Northeast comer of the Southeast Quartero Section 15, Township 48 South, Collier County, Florida; thence n North 89' 17' 40" W ILO 00 1 i P.O.B. ' / I W u7 O - N89' 1 T0 W 4260.84 - W b to O NE COR SE 1/4 SEC 15-48-25 W O I Z Z cn ' � J cn Q pt, along the North line of the Southebs�arter of the said Section 15 for a distance of 260.84 feet to 0q T OF BEGINNING of the parcel of land herein described; thence u{i South 35' 42' 20" West for a distance ad 115.25 feet; t�ieaFj jrun �� m North 54' 17' 40" West for a distance of 15.DO feet; thience ir�1n North 35' € 42' 20" East for a distance of 104.75 feet to a point the North line of the Southeast Quarter of the sold Section n,£, ence p, run South 89' 17' 40' East along the North line fo the t�ast Quarter of the said Section 15 for a distance of 18.31 f�ei� the POINT OF BEGINNING 1 i Containing 0.0379 Acres, more or less. e `: �` `s i Bearings shown hereon refer to on assumed bearing of N89 1'7 Yit 9 along the North line of the SE 1/4 Section 15, Township 48 South Range 25 East SIGNED. ' zz 9cF ` .. HOLE MONTES & ASSOCIATES, INC. BY: � ', �/ G -- P.I-S. 3741 Thomas J. Garris State of no. • NOT A SURVEY • '� HOLE, MONTES & ASSOCIATES •P, ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS NAPLES - FORT MYERS - BONITA SPRINGS 80 0 80 160 SCALE IN FEET SKETCH OF A LEGAL DESCRIPTION 88.46 DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 SEC. 15, TMP 48 S. RGE 25 E SSE uE f vwmm ` a164'1T 4Cw �' <� gT4Y 7?E2_'' iTP 1T 40'E °;tOl7S *02'29" E 50' �25' r I' I 00'00" E HMA FILE NO. 88.46 FEBRUARY 15. 1990 DRAINAGE EASEMENT E 1/4 COR. SEC. 15-48-25 N8917'40'W 788.43 SOUTH LINE NE 1/4 SEC. 15-48-25 N89'17'40'W N89'17'40'W 788.43 A strip of land 50 foot wide located in Section 15. Township 4 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida being further described as follows: The South 25 feet of the East 788.43 feet of the Northeast ic of Section 15. Township 48 South, Range 25 East. Collier Coon Florida; and the North 25 feet of the East 788.43 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 15. Township 48 South. Range 4: Collier County, Florida. Containing 0.905 Acres, more or less Bearings shown hereon refer to an assumed bearing of N89'17' along the South line of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 15 Twp 48 S, Rge SIGNED: G' Z HOLE, MONIES k ASSOCIATES. INC. BY: P.L.S. 3741 Thomas J. Garris t State of Flo. * NOT A SURVEY * m or. nm 4u 2 HOLE, MONTES do ASSOCIATES I'm 6Y. DATE �D. 2 00 �� ENGINEERS — PLANNERS — SURVEYORS 117, D Err: DAZE NAPLES — FORT MYERS — SONITA SPRINGS 25' L0 N I 00 1 Lo U Uj In w� z o -� o � O Q 80 0 80 160 SCALE IN FEET SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED IN THE E 1/2 OF SEC 15. TWP 48 S. RGE 25 E O cn m x x H q B-1295 ro PRO&= NO. q G� 88.46 N RUEF"CE NO. o ee{ewr .� N - �� d` 7 Thin laalrument prepared by: R. Brae Anderson, Esq. Young, ran Auenderp, Vamadoe d Benton, P.A. 801 IAurel Oat Drive, Suite 700 Naples, Florida 77967 (817) 597_7814 1864 OR BOOK EXHIBIT "B" 000451 PAGE GRANT OF REVISED DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made and entered into this 27 day of January , 1993, by and between IMPERIAL GOLF CLUB, INC., a Florida corporation, as Grantor, and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, its successors, assigns and licensees, as Grantee: WITNESSETH: That the Grantor for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, by these presents does hereby grant to the Grantee, its successors, assigns and licensees, a perpetual, nonexclusive easement for drainage purposes, over, under, upon and across the following lands, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, described in the attached Exhibit "Art which is incorporated by reference herein.,r x.. Subject to easemeptstl cs f reservations of record. To have and t3iold the same -,,unt said Grantee, its successors, assi ns;,°And licensees, toghewith the right to enter upon said lands`"ti C"onstruct and maint`gin rainage facilities thereof, together *ith^� impro improvements, rates, fills, cuts, drains, ditches anc other i►cidettals vwhich Grantee, its successors, asst�igns,,in&44C"o o e wCes ary or convenient in connection tthewthnc nit' no»� '�th,this instrument. By accept.ncs"fig xof hsnsrument, Grantee abandons, relinq�iishes and waives 4,ta11 n eVgt' in that certain drainage easem�� ecorded at 0 R" .k"JoC B BB Pages 1897-1898, Official Recorder ,Collier County -al loiic'a� in acknowledgement that the easement", rented by this j�nl% 'umeFlt is to replace the prior recorded dr 2,h (6.easement. This dedication,' -ands? - 0 e of the same shall not place any duty, burden or 11i Al u pn Collier County, by formal act of the governing body,o_aacQept the of herein and hereby dedicated, not obligate Collier County to improve the aforesaid property in any manner, nor shall acceptance of this dedication by Collier County obligate Collier County to improve the aforesaid property in any manner. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the be executed in its name and hereto by its proper officer year first above written. witnesses: AZ,c.J4f-:e•p �• ��'-eta signature Name Printed Si�nature t: r Name Printed 1% - q,3 -0 11 Grantor has caused these presents to its corporation seal to be affixed thereunto duly authorized the day and IMPERIAL GOLF B, INC. a Florida C p ratio By Print Name: FRANK J. BRINKMAN Its: PRESIDENT _ (CORPORATE SEAL) JFirtjk Q4 - �'°p.� w I ATTEST: Dy �AW ,,SROCS, CLBRR ,y _f ',�Approved,ap"to form and legal • stif tiency Assistant Co'tty Attorney STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 1864 OR BOOK 000452 PAGEi BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, F,1.9RIDA - BORT L. SAUNDERS, y�IjIMAN Its• Chairman /�/ BEFORE ME, an officer duly authorized in the state and County last aforesaid to take acknowledgments and administer oaths, this day personally appeared FRANK J. BRINKMAN as President of IMPERIAL GOLF CLUB, INC., a Florida Corporation, to me well known and known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to and before me that he/she executed said instrument for the purposes therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and official seal this Z day of Jftn ce ��Zv , 1993. N STATE OF FLORI COUNTY OF COLT WA ANNE SANZAR Print Name' ~ C 088158 S` x=\ ' an officer duly I HEREBY d FY,- iat this ay, iiefbrO' ►i°, Y authorized in tTe State and 4�gount�y �resaid to take acknowledgments;j`p tsonally appeared'�'URTIL [NA!'RS well known to me to be they ft- Arman of the Bo�I�d bf ,ty commissioners, Collier County, F is , As The Governing' ody of Collier County and as Ex-Officio e� c ,rnin Board o tie,, ollier County Water- g Sewer District, bean utkorized sO �"g , executed the foregoing Grant of Revised DrainAc�t-E se,m mar abandonment of Existing Drainage Easement for thereTT:aes`" therein contained under authority duly invested by the Board of County Commissioners, and that the seal affixed thereto is the true seal of said Board. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this day of , 1993. Notary ublic )a - Printed Name Commission Number My Commission expires: Y SEAL 2088IM FF ItOLYN OS'Uf E IC FILSON OF FL rJDA NOT PU4LIC STAfFCC��44 COMMISSION NO. htY S--- EXP. AUG. 6,1996 CUraN' IR64 000453 OR BOOK RM PAGE 1 OF 3 EXHIBIT "A" DRAINAGE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION The North 25 feet of the East 788.43 feet of Southeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida and A strip of land 15 foot wide located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida being further described as follows: Commence at the Northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida; thence run North 89'17'40" West, along the North line of the Southeast Quarter of the said Section 15 for a distance of 260.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel of land herein described; thence run South 35'42'20" West for a distance of 115.25 feet; thence run thence run North 35*42'2� North line of the So,th 89*17140" East alon 15 for a distance o, Containing 0.4904 A Bearings shown here line of the SE 1/4 - " %stfor a distance Quarter of the said North line o to Souea 1 tie to` the kPQ N� O ' E $y' .'er to an assumed be ring Ze, r"5, Township 48 SoAilk t a distance of 15.00 feet; '�,75 feet to a point on the t�ctioti 15; thence run South Otart�r of the said Section 4011W along the North East. E 1/4 COR. SEC. 15-48-25 ?'29" E F25' (- 50' _ N89'17'40"W 788.4.3 -�' SOUTH LINE NE 1/4 SEC. 15-48-25 N8917'40'W —� NB917'40'W 788.43 YOO" E HMA FILE NO. 88.46 FEBRUARY 15. 1990 DRAINAGE EASEMENT locatedA strip of land 50 foot wide In Section 15�- South. Range 25 EwL CollierCoun IP Florid being further described as follows: The South 25 feet of the East 788.43 feet of the Northeast Du of Section 15. Township 48 South. Range 25 East. Collier Counts Florida; and the North 25 feet of the East 788.43 feet of the Southeast Oundnr of Suction 15. Township 48 s-,th -Remga 25 Collier County. Florldo. Containing 0.905 Acres. more or lass Bearings shown hereon refer to an assumed bearing of N89'17'4 along the South line of the HE 1/4 of Sec. 15 Twp 48 S. Rge SIGNED: * FZ HOLE. MONTES & ASSOCUITM INC. P.L.S. 3741 Thomas .L Gorris State of Fla • NOT A SURVEY • L HOLE. MONTES do ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS —PLANNERS —SURVEYORS NAPLES — FORT MYERS — BONRA SPRINGS 25' 1 25' LO N 1 Go i U W rn W1 Z O J O I-- o Na b KTZ 80 0 80 160 SCALE IN FEET SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED IN THE E 1/2 OF SEC 15. TWP 48 S. RGE 25 E B-1295 88.46 W46ea.. C: � O ao O M 51 a E4 FA on F-4 X ril 1�64 000455 lik BOOK PAGE] NORTH UNE SE 1/4 SEC 15-48-25 PROPOSED 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT A strip of land 15 foot wide located in the Southeast Ouarter" Section 15. Township 48 South, Range 25 East, CollierCounty. Florido being further described as follows: Commence at the Northeast corner of the S0pjhea_st , arter Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East,-!,C��O�k�'1 r County. Florida; thence run North 89'17'40- West, c�o -t_hpe North line the Southeast Quarter of the said Sectlarl,'1r3ar O distance c 278.35 feet; thence run South 00'42'20 _* tt or a distance" 25.00 feet to the P&INT OF BEGINNING Ofr ,parcel at 4a71d 1 described: thence run South 35'42'20 1VGst for a distance of feet; thence run South 45'31'36' West for 4 Idistance of r53.4 thence run North 44'2824" West for agdistorlce of 1500 feet thence run North 45*31'36- East fora 41i t a of 5215#feet; run North 35'42'20- East for a distance r 71,3.59 feet to o"dp 25.00 feet South of, as measured at ri es to, )Ke Not Of the Southeast Ouarter of the said Sectn 15; then e r" South 89'17'40 East parallel with the Narth of the S, utt Ouorter of the said Section 15 for a drs� t§18.3 ft t POINT OF BEGINNING, Containing 0.0455 Aaregre +pr ss, Bearings shown hereon refer to on assumed bepru of_N,.89, along the North line of the Southeast Quarter oT Section TSr. Township 48 South, Range 25 East. N IMPERIAL LAKES ao , W _ O N89-1 40 W 278.35 0 7DD.E. L1 O P.O.B. NE COR SE 1/4 SEC 15-48-25 W O Z CO J Z LLtn Q W UNE ', DfRi;Q ON DISTANCE W 7`. 25.00 85.M 3 'W � 5 t)4,5�f7��'E 52.1D5 6 ft `4 40 E ?O 73.59 11131 18 31 7 �`t k; SCALE SIGNED: 08/20/92 ZZTES AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BY: P.L.S. #4175 Stephen Seidler State of no. * NOT A SURVEY HOLE, MONTES & ASSOCIATES SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION �PROPOSED 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS ENGINEERS - BONRA SPRINGS LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 SEC- 15, TWP 48 S. RGE 25 E � NAPLES -FORT MYERS a 1864 000456 JR BOOK PAGE1 This Instrument prepared by: R. Bruce Anderson, Esq. Young, van Assenderp, Va rnadoe 6 Benton, P.A. a01 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 33963 (813) 597-2814 GRANT OF REVISED DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT 'H S ND NTURE, made and entered into this -.- day of 1993, by and between N.A. REALTY INC., a Florida corporation, as Grantor, and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, its successors, assigns and licensees, as Grantee: WITNESSETH: That the Grantor for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($l.00) and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, by these presents does hereby grant to the Grantee, its successors, assigns and licensees, a perpetualand nonexclusive easement for drainage purposes, over, under, up across the following lands, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, described in the attached Exhibit All which is incorporated by reference herein. Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record. To have and successors, assigns enter upon said lands thereof, together 5 drains, ditches / successors, assigns in connection t"rei By accept abandons, reli drainage easen Official Recor that the easen prior recorded to hold the__ same other inciden licensees, may( aft-C not in con :a 3 ®0L1 mid. pia s ala: rec t E �i�r `CCu1Fit( � t isx in easement. unto said Grantee, its ,gether with the right to `1gtain drainage facilities ' grades, fills, cuts, a,is)p;aPhich Grantee, its �e�tne ssary or convenient lic w ih this instrument. this instrument, Grantee est` in that certain o`,808, 'Pages 1897-1898, Lbr�daj J-4 acknowledgement t nimerLF- s to replace the This dedic i and the recor*ion )o 'VJie same shallno place any duty, bit e or liability ubdn','S6i County, by formal act of the governs body, to accept the.,,,, he 33�o)$erty herein and hereby dedicated, not obli }a� slier Conyt� "improve the aforesaid property in any manned, rl Sla Ccece of this dedication by Collier County obligatedl >e,, to improve the aforesaid .. property in any manner. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name and its corporation seal to be affixed hereto by its proper officer thereunto duly authorized the day and year first above written. N.A. TY TRUST, C. Wi se a F1 r' a Cow, t n r�i 3 � _ Signature By. M J C►M.1 HAMGS �.j Print Name: UBRE FERRAO S Name Printed V � • Its: President ignature Z Q (CORPORATE SEAL) X m Name Printed 0 V. 7 ,r Or ,k. ATT ps�S .(�Icock, Cleck ;-49 �!%&bved. ap,.to form and q���] " tciency Assistant Cou y Attorney STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 1864 OR BOOK 000457 PROM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER OUNT FL O IDA By: BURT L. SAUNDERS Its• Chairman BEFORE ME, an officer duly authorized in the state and County last aforesaid to take acknowledgments and administer oaths, this day personally appeared AUBREY FERRAO, as President of N.A. REALTY TRUST, INC., a Florida Corporation, to me well known and known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to and before me that he executed said instrument for the purposes therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and official seal this 3day of 1993. Ncatax Public jZ Commissioir'�Ner OTARY ►UBM STATE OF ►LORmA AT LARW M . COMMOSION EXPIRES AUGUST M.1994 ,f 80 ED THRU AGENT'S NOTARY BROKERAGR s STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER . I HEREBY CERL'X z�L nL u11g t-110', z I authorized irk ' rekerid: Co' acknowledgment6`s i s r al appe "rd BI to me to be tla airman of the Bo Collier County,:�'�'Jida, As The Gov4a and as Ex -Of f iciq the, Governing Board Sewer District, b'A6ng°\,authorized so to Grant of Revised e Easement a, Drainage Easement ob �Purpps�:s authority duly investdd by ]Ae PQ 9 that the seal affixed tharm is a �t 6r met, an officer duly aforesaid to take SANDERS, well known "..= Commissioners, OdA Cy $'cads?,. of Collier County e co llier County Water- - cuted the foregoing donment of Existing e'rein contained under unty Commissioners, and seal of said Board. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this _2111- day of 1993. Notary Pu is C-0111n't�eNa�me� Commission Number My Commission expires: 208 81M 9I;1� Qa(jN �I(1'fi AV 0 3KXSTARE (OF 1 - ��/COA�ON NO. OC= lk �864 000458 OR BOOK MO PAGE 1 OF 2 EXHIBIT "A" DRAINAGE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South 25 feet of the East 788.43 feet of the Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Containing 0.4525 Acres, more or less. { E 1/4 COR. SEC. 15-48-25 3'02'29" E , 50 0' �25 N8997'40*W 788.43 SOUTH LINE NE 1/4 SEC. 15-48-25 �—�E — — — — — — — — N89'17'40'W ,0 N89'17'40"W 788.43 O'00'00" E HMA FILE NO. 88.46 FEBRUARY 15. 1990 DRAINAGE EASEMENT A strip of land 50 t wideSouth. Range 25 East.Collie, County. Flor1 Floridaod being further described as follows The South 25 feet of the East 788.43 feet of the NortheasO Fof lorida;Section 15. nd the NorthIP48 South. 25 feet of thRange tEast 71B&43 feet of(1 Southeast Ouader ofSection,M TmenshlP 48 South._Raogs. Collier County, Florida Containing 0.905 Acres. more or less Bearings shown hereon refer to an assumed bearing of N89 along the South line of to NE 1/4 of Sea 15 TwP 48 S. F SIGNED: * HOLE. MONTES do ASSOCIATES. INC. P.L.S. 3741 BY: T ` ' Thomas J. Game State of Fla 0, e. ' -> ;c o - x j F7 s >, 3 3 -'"` ro .-.,:i,�✓ - ns�xr 3 gip' g. _, -. v 25' 1 25' to N I 00 I U W nn LaZ Q J o � o 80 0 80 160 SCALE IN FEET to x x H m ;X' OCO O C" ;K 4w- -0 O 1 c,n co SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION 88.46 HOLE, IrfONTES do ASSOCIATES dN a DRAINAGE EASEMENT 0 A� ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS LOCATED IN THE E 1/2 OF SEC 15. TWP 48 S. RGE 25 E ee+e.a. MAPLES - FORT MYERS - BONITA SPRINGS * NOT A SURVEY * B-1295 V! • 1 r - F r' - 61991 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 3301 E. TAMIAMI TR. GROWTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FL 33962 (813)774-8282 A CERTIFIED BLUE CHIP COMMUNITY February 4, 1991 Mr. R. Bruce Anderson, Agent Young, Van Assenderp, Varnadoe and Benton, P. A. 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 33963 Re: EXM-031--NN (second response) for Property Described as the E 1/2 of NE 1/4 of Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East,.STRAP #482515-010.000; Owner: N. A. Realty Trust, Inc.. ZONING: PUD - Imperial Lakes (residential) Dear Bruce: Please be advised the following determination has been made by the Growth Planning Department regarding the above -referenced Exemption application. Though the subject property is deemed inconsistent and unimproved, it is exempted from the Zoning Reevaluation Program contained in the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance 90--23, pursuant to the Exemption granted below: Determination Exemption Requested * approved Development Dedications, Contributions and Conveyances (Sec. 2.4.6) Limitations I. A determination which grants anyexemption shall exempt development only to the extent expressly contained in such exemption provision. 2. An exemption applies to the land and is therefore transferable from owner to owner of the land subject to the exemption. See enclosed memorandum from Bob Blanchard dated January-28, 1991. Mr. Anderson February 4, 1991 Page 2 3.. Anything in the Zoning Reevaluation ordinance to the contrary notwithstanding, an exemption may be revoked upon a showing by the County of a peril to public health, safety or general welfare of the residents of Collier County unknown at the time. of approval. it is important that a copy of this Exemption approval letter accompany all development order (e.g. Final Site Development Plan, building permit, sign permit, etc.) applications to assist in avoiding any delay in processing and reviewing of that development order application(s). Should you have any questions regarding the contents of this letter, or the Zoning Reevaluation ordinance in general, please call me at 774--8282. PREPARED BY P-4,"-j " "�~ David Weeks Senior Planner REVIEWED BY Growth Planning Director cc: EXM/File DW/2.491/BA MEMORANDUM TO: David Weeks, Se�or Planner Y'eFROM: Bob Blanchardi Growth Planning Director DATE: January 28, 1991 SUBJECT: EXM-031-NN, Imperial Lakes PUD, R. Bruce Anderson Agent, Request For Exemption 2.4.6 f BACKGROUND Section.2.4.6 of the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance (Ordinance 90-23) permits the following exemption to the application of the Ordinance: 2.4..6 Development Dedications, Contributions and Conveyances. The provisions of this Ordinance shall not affect the validity of any lawfully issued and effective development order (including a development order that acquired its density or intensity of use through the transfer of development rights) which was approved or issued subject to a condition that required a dedication, contribution or conveyance of a substantial interest in real or personal property to any governmental agency if: 2.4.6.1 The dedication, contribution or conveyance on which the development order was conditioned has been lawfully granted, accepted by the applicable governmental agency and recorded, if appropriate, in the public records of Collier County, Florida; and 2.4.6.2 The dedication, contribution or conveyance on which the development order was conditioned benefits the public; and 2.4.6.3 The dedication, contribution or conveyance on which the development order was conditioned is in excess of those required under the Collier County Subdivision Regulations (Ordinance No. 76-6), as amended, the Collier County Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No.,82-2.), as amended, and the Collier County Growth Management Plan, as amended, and clearly benefits the public or property other than the subject property. This exemption is subject to the same limitations outlined in Section 2.4.7 as all other exemptions provided for in the Ordinance. The applicant has submitted for. an exemption to the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance for the.Imperial Lakes PUD based on the dedication of fifty (50) feet of right of way along the north property line to accommodate a portion of Livingston Road. ANALYSIS The applicant has furnished all of the information required by the exemption application. This analysis and any conclusion based thereon is conditioned upon the accuracy and validity of the facts, evidence or information as presented by the applicant. It is clear that the referenced dedications represent a substantial interest of real or personal property. The property owner at the time of development order approval and the time of the dedication was the sole owner of the property including the property subject to the dedication. Ordinance 82-81 is the development order that approves what is known as Imperial Lakes PUD. The development order requires the developer to reserve fifty feet of right of way along the north property boundary to accommodate an east/west arterial road (the planned Livingston Road). The development order provides that the developer could be released from this reservation if the planned arterial is ever deleted from the comprehensive plan. However, the applicant dedicated the property subject to the reservation to Collier County in the form of a Warranty Deed which was recorded in the public records of the County. The dedication will benefit the public as Livingston Road is actually constructed. The ultimate construction of this corridor will provide an alternative corridors for travel in this area of the County. The Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance requires that the dedication,. conveyance and contributions that are the subject of the exemption application be in excess of the County's Subdivision Regulations (Ordinance 76-6), Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance 82-2) and the Collier County Growth Management Plana these references make it clear that the comparison is to the regulations currently in effect, not those regulations in effect at the time of development order approval. The dedication of this right of way is beyond the requirements outlined in these three regulations. FINDINGS Based on the material provided by the applicant and the above analyses, I have made the following findings: 1. The property owner at the time of the dedication of the right of way for a portion of the Livingston Road Corridor had a substantial interest in the property which included the right of way. The property owner was the sole owner of the property. 2. The reservation of fifty feet of right of way was a condition of the development order (Ordinance 82W81) approving the Imperial Lakes PUD. 3. The dedication of the right of way was accepted by Collier County and recorded in the Public Records of Collier County. 4. The provision of right of way is in excess of the requirements of the Subdivision Regulauions, Zoning Ordinance and ti he Growth Management Plan. CONCLUSION This application meets the criteria for an exemption to the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance under Section 2.4.6 of that Ordinance and is approved. El r r E8 I I mi RESOLUTION 97- 72 A RESOLUT10N BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.7.3.4 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AFFECTING ORDINANCE 82-81 KNOWN AS IMPERIAL LAKES PUD, EXTENDING THE CURRENT PUD APPROVAL TO FEBRUARY 11, 2002; AND PROVIpING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Imperial Lakes PUD, Ordinance 02-81 adopters on September 14, 1982, may be subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.1., of the Land Development Cade (LDC), Time Limite for Approved PUD Zoning Districts together with their respective Master Pl.a,nni and WHEREAS, the PUD was adopted consistent with and under the provisions of the Colliers County Grewth Management Plan and has a valid and effective Final Site Development Plan approval, which approval prohibited the issuance of building permits for the PUD until Livingston Road was constructed by the County, and said road has not yet been constructed; and WHEREAS, the density of the PUD has previously been determined, to be vested; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has reviewed the PUD and has determined to extend the current PUD Zoning for five years, until February 11, 2002. NOW, 'THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of County commissioners of Collier County, Florida that: 1. The above recitals are adopted herein by reference as if fully set forth herein. 2. This Resolution shall constitute evidence of the County's compliance with the review requirements of Section 2.7.3.4 of the LDC. 3. Pursuant. to said section of the LDC, the current PUD approval is hereby extended to February 11, 2002; at the end of which time it may be determined whether the PUD property owner is required to submit to the procedures its LDC Section 2.7.3.4. 4. Prior to construction under the authority of approved Final. Site Development Plan (VSDP) No. 89-134, Said FSDP 9ha11 be reviewed for compliance with the r_DC requirements in of fact on the date of this Resolution and shall be amended to be brought into compliance to the extent that said requirements do not invalidate or require changes or amendments to the permits of other agencies and do not cause the placement of buildings and infrastructure shown an the FSDP to be changed or the buildable area to be reduced. FEB 1 1 S7 This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its approval. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board and in the records of the Petition For which the extension is granted. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this _Z day of February, 1997. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ,,;,...., TIMOTHY HANCOCK, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E: ; BRQGK, CLERK i. �1 ROV-D AB.,TQVFORM'AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: MARJ IE M. STUDENT ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY 50•rba\r*to1ution V, COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 0 WATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING D November 22, 1988 N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. 6101 Pelican Bay Blvd. Naples, FL 33963 RE: Excavation Permit No. 59.148 "Imperial Lakes" Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East Collier County, Florida Dear Gentlemen: Collier County records show that the property located east of Old US 41 (see attached map) and more particularly described as: The East 1/2 of the NE la of Section 15, T 48 S, R 25 E, subject to easements, was purchased to you in July 1988. The Board of County Commissioners had issued an excavation permit on this property several years ago. However, due to the lapse in activity on the excavation, the permit is considered to be void. During an inspection of the site on October 18, 1988, it was discovered that work was being done to clear the area and prepare it for excavation. The operator indicated that "West Coast" had purchased the property. I would greatly appreciate any information you could provide as to the proposed intentions to do work on this site. If you are not directly involved or have subsequently sold this property, please provide any information you can as to who can be contacted to discuss this project. Thank you for your help in this matter. Please contact rme'or Stephanie R. Smith of this office at 813--774-8277, as soon as possible. Sincerely, 1 & .,' John H. Boldt, P.E. Water Management Director JHB/S RS/als Enc. 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FLORIDA 33962-4977 813-774-8999 WATER W1ANAGEMENT PLAN Figure � VIUINiTY MAP d o e z 2000 0 2000 4000 z '~ �1 t scale i"= 20C?0 ' ` ,eef' SECrTjo:j COR.11ER , e d `° •?. EAST BOUNDARY. co cv SEC7. 6. T1`i P.46S.R G E.25E s - a- 'SITE .PLAN `9-2B6 1000 0 - 1000 scale V=1000 feet 77— �. p rt• ,. p. Development Services Department F rah Community Development Division 1 Collier County Government ;k. = ;= 2800 North Horseshoe Drive 1 Naples, FL 33942.6917 Phone; 813 1 643.8400 D f`^ r PROJECT REVIEW SERVICES may. July 24, 1990 Mr. Jeff Nunner Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc. 715 Tenth Street South Naples, Florida 33939 r f� JU t4 u� RE: Development Excavation Permit No. 59.148 "Imperial Lakes" Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East Collier County, Florida Dear Jeff: In accordance with the authority given in Section 6.B of County Ordinance No. 88-26, your application for a "Development" Excavation is hereby approved subject to the following stipulations: 1. The excavation shall be limited to a bottom elevation of -3.0 ft. ngvd. All disturbed areas proposed for lake excavation shall be excavated to a minimum elevation of 1.5 ft. ngvd. 2. No excavated material shall, be removed from the project site. Since we are in receipt of the excavation performance guarantee in the amount of $10,000.00 and the permit fee in the amount of $154.00 this letter is your authorization to proceed with the excavation project in accordance with your plans and the above -mentioned stipulations. Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact us at (813).:643-8471. cerely Gre Robertson Sent gineer GHR/ gs cc: Clyde Fugate, Engineering Inspection Supervisor Margaret Kincaid; SFWMD Field Engineer (Naples) July 11, 1990 N A REALTY TRUST A = N C 1� 6401 PELICAN BAY BLVD. MAPLES, FLORIDA 33963 e"i c� 1 VIA HAND DELIVERY Mr. Gregory H. Robertson Senior Engineer Collier County Development Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, F1 33942 RE: DEVELOPMENT EXCAVATION NO, 59.148 "IMPERIAL LAKES" Section 1S, Township 48 South, Range 25 East Collier County, Florida Dear Greg: Enclosed for your use and review .is an irrevocable standby Letter of credit issued by Barnett Bank of Naples for the above referenced project and excavation permit. Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to ca 11 . Your,s �u , John Hayes / — Development( Manager JH/hg Enclosure CC'. Jeff Nunner, Hole Montes k IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 513 ISSUER: Barnett Bank of Naples, 796 Fifth Ave. S. Naples, F133940 (hereinafter "Issuer") PLACE AND DATE OF ISSUE: 796 fifth Ave.. S., Naples, FL 33940 June 5, 1990 PLACE OF EXPIRY: At Issuer's Counters DATE OF EXPIRY: This Credit shall be valid until June 5, 1991 and shall thereafter be automatically renewed for successive one-year periods on the anniversary of its issue unless at least sixty (60) days prior to any such anniversary date, th.e Issuer notifies the Beneficiary in writing by registered mail that the Issuer elects riot to renew this Credit. APPLICANT: N.A. Realty 'Trust 6401 Pelican Bay Blvd. Naliles, FL 3396340 (hereinafter "Applicant") BENEFICIARY: The Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida (Hereinafter "Beneficiary") Collier County Courthouse Complex Naples, Florida 33962, Attn: Project Review Services AMOUNT: $10,000.00 (U.S.) up town aggregate thereof. CREDIT AVAILABLE WITH: Issuer BY: Payment against documents detailed herein and Beneficiary's drafts at sight drawn on the Issuer. DOCUMENTS REQUIRED: AVAILABLE BY BENEFICIARY`S DRAFT(S) AT SIGHT DRAWN ON THE ISSUER AND ACCOMPANIED BY BENEFICIARY'S STATEMENT PURPORTEDLY SIGNED BY THE COUNTY MANAGER, CERTIFYING THAT: "N.A. Realty Trust" has failed to meet or complete the requirements of the Excavation Permit #59.148, Site Development Plan #89-184 for the project named Imperial Lakes or a final inspection satisfactory to Collier County, pursuant to Colli.erCounty Ordinance No. 88-26, has not been performed prior to the date of expiry and satisfactory alternative performance security has not been provided to and formally accepted by the "Beneficiary". DRAFT(S) DRAWN UNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT MUST BE MARKED: "Drawn under Barnett Bank of Naples, Credit No. 513 dated June 5, 1990. The original letter of credit and all amendments, if any, must be presented for proper endorsement. Letter of Credit No. 513 N.A. Realty Trust Page 2 This Letter of Credit sets forth in full the terms of the Issuer's undertaking and such undertaking shall not in any way be modified, amended or amplified by reference to any documents, instrument, or agreement referenced to herein or in which this letter of credit relates, and any such reference shall not be deemed to incorporate herein by reference any document, instrument or agreement. Issuer hereby engages with Beneficiary that draft(s) drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this credit will be duly honored by Issuer if presented within the validity of this credit. This credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (1983 Revision) International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 400. BARNETT BANK OF NAPLES .1 BY Ldc t..t _ !/ Sri Christ pher C Houtchens Senior Vice President Senior Loan Officer `a w al Y i a•y - w � , Y �1. r r j It 1 _ • !�i!' ^� a 4 � ■mow � � +!+ ' �. r ' •r� - 1 r. +. g�ayypp �'., pr i � � � . rri ■ 'r arc #' .•s�Ew�vgrrr Ap ■ ti rt r.�ri= ■ •• +. IF v.r:'64. nil: tauR wl•�r Afar �� w"Parwooma ' ■ _'r" r l u ' ■ -,arch �. jo Ila i' } 'a. r•'i.•'-r..• .,rls� •i�• lap + ,• +•l�s_'� ■ j i nt pp Epold to _ a .rY , ' •. RRr 'l+sj�,; -+'M �Iiti4r ;ci -r `L Af 9w, UPC r�, I 1 1,400 700 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLEMENT IMPERIAL LAKES JULY 2025 Prepared by: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. Marine & Environmental Consulting PHONE:239-643-0166 WWW.THANAPLES.COM Table of Contents 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................................1 2 Existing Conditions (Pre-Development).......................................................................................................3 2.1 FLUCFCS Codes and Habitat Descriptions...........................................................................................3 2.2 Vegetative Associations............................................................................................................................4 2.3 Topography and Drainage Patterns.......................................................................................................6 2.4 Wetlands & Other Surface Waters..........................................................................................................7 2.4.1 Wetland Seasonal High -Water Table & Hydroperiod.....................................................................7 2.4.2 Jurisdictional Status of Wetlands and Other Surface Waters.........................................................7 2.5 Native Habitat...........................................................................................................................................8 2.6 Listed Plant and Animal Species.............................................................................................................9 2.7 Historical and Archaeological Resources............................................................................................10 2.8 Soils...........................................................................................................................................................10 3 Proposed Conditions (Post Development).................................................................................................19 3.1 Proposed Project......................................................................................................................................19 3.2 Project Impacts to Wetlands..................................................................................................................20 3.2.1 Direct, Permanent Impacts................................................................................................................20 3.2.2 Temporary Impacts............................................................................................................................20 3.2.3 Secondary Impacts to Wetlands and Water Resources..................................................................20 3.2.4 Cumulative Impacts to Wetlands.....................................................................................................21 3.3 Preservation of Wetlands, Other Surface Waters, and Uplands.......................................................21 3.4 Project Impact to Listed Species............................................................................................................22 3.5 Project Impacts to Archaeological/Historical Resources..................................................................26 4 Avoidance and Minimization of Wetland Impacts..................................................................................27 5 Project Consistency with CCME..................................................................................................................28 AppendixA: Exhibits................................................................................................................................................1 Appendix B: Listed Species Survey........................................................................................................................2 Appendix C: Initial Coordination with Division of Historical Resources .....................................................3 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 1 INTRODUCTION The Imperial Lakes PUD is approximately 78.28 acres in size and contains the 76.81-acre project site and approximately 1.47 acres of road right-of-way set aside for the Veterans Memorial Blvd Extension in northern Collier County, east of Old U.S. 41 and west of Livingston Road, just south of the Lee/ Collier County line. The property is located within Sections 14 and 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, in Collier County, Florida. The project site is identified as folio number 00153160004 by the Collier County property appraiser's office. Access to the project is via Veterans Memorial Extension from Livingston Road to the northern property line. A general location map is provided in the included exhibits. The proposed project lands have been used in the past as a fill borrow pit (Collier County Excavation Permit # 59.148), and it was permitted through the SFWMD permit for a residential development in 1990 (Permit #11-00684-S), though the property is currently undeveloped/vegetated land. There are residential developments and golf courses in the vicinity to the east and south. There are also commercial and industrial uses within 1,000 feet to the west and northwest of the property. The property directly adjacent to the east is a new high school. Properties immediately west and northwest of the site are part of the Collier County Railhead Preserve which was purchased and protected as part of the Conservation Collier Program. The overall project boundary is limited to the approximately 76.81-acre Imperial Lakes property. The site consists primarily of undeveloped, forested land surrounding two man-made fill pit ponds from when the site was mined for fill. These ponds will be partially preserved and incorporated into the development's surface water management program and there will be no loss of surface waters as a result of the project. A majority of the site has been infested to varying degrees by exotic vegetation including melaleuca and Brazilian pepper. The property has also been impacted by historic ORV use. The property contains about 39.13 acres of upland habitats (51% of the project area) and 23.04 acres of wetland habitats (30% of the project area) as well as 14.64 acres of other surface waters (OSW) (19% of the project area). Development of the access roadway to the project site has been initiated by Collier County. Planning and permitting for the Veterans Memorial Extension will soon be underway. The proposed project is occurring on a site which has been heavily impacted by past mining and off -road vehicle activities. The proposed development does impact state jurisdictional wetlands, though these impacts have been minimized to the maximum extent practicable. The majority of the wetlands proposed to be impacted are relatively low functioning wetlands due to past impacts and exotic vegetation infestation. A wetland enhancement program is proposed which will improve the long-term viability prospect of the remaining on -site wetlands as well as provide increased functional value and wading bird foraging values to the local watershed. The preserved wetlands meet the County hierarchy with respect to native vegetation preservation requirements for the project, though they are not interconnected with each other or to the off -site Railhead Preserve. 1 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 This document provides information concerning the proposed Imperial Lakes project site as it relates to natural resources and environmental issues. It is submitted to Collier County in support of an Amended Planned Unit Development zoning request. The document was compiled by Timothy Hall, Senior Ecologist and Vice President at Turrell, Hall & Associates Inc. Mr. Hall received his Bachelor's and Master's degrees in Wildlife and Wetlands Ecology from University of Florida has been conducting wetland and wildlife surveys in Collier County for the past 25 years. 2 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PRE -DEVELOPMENT) Of the total 76.81 acres contained within the Imperial Lakes property boundary, approximately 51% are considered uplands (39.13 ac.) and 49% are considered wetlands or other surface waters (23.04 ac. of wetlands and 14.64 ac. of OSW). Several portions of the property have been infested and taken over to some degree by noxious exotic vegetation; including earleaf acacia, melaleuca and Brazilian pepper. 2.1 FLUCFCS CODES AND HABITAT DESCRIPTIONS The Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) manual was used to classify all of the vegetative communities occurring within the parcel boundaries. The attached FLUCFCS exhibit shows the subject property together with its vegetative cover and depicts the approximate limits of the wetland and upland areas. A general description is provided below in Table 1. Table 1: FLUCFCS Codes and Descriptions of Community Types FLUCFCS Code Description Acres Jurisdictional Wetlands/OSW_ 322 Coastal Scrub 3.91 No 411E1-E3 Pine Flatwoods 22.83 No 411E4 Pine Flatwoods (Brazilian pepper)** 11.50 No 414 Pine - Mesic Oak 0.89 No 520 OSW - Ponds 14.64 Yes 621E1-E3 Cypress 13.15 Yes 621E4 Cypress (Melaleuca)** 0.51 Yes 624E2 Cypress - Pine - Cabbage Palm 3.33 Yes 625E1-E3 H dric Pine Flatwoods 2.91 Yes 625E4 H dric Pine Flatwoods (Melaleuca)** 2.30 Yes 641 Freshwater Marsh 0.84 Yes Total: 76.81 23.04 / 14.64 **Areas do not qualify as native habitat under Collier County guidelines. There is a small remnant coastal scrub component in the north-west corner of the project site which has been severely impacted by off -road vehicle use. There are no other rare or exceptional vegetation associations present on the project lands. 3 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 2.2 VEGETATIVE ASSOCIATIONS A list of plant species observed within each habitat type is found below. C = Canopy M = Midstory G = Groundcover V = Vine E = Epiphyte * - Protected species 322 - Coastal Scrub, 3.91 acres in Imperial Property Slash pine Pinus elliottii C & M Dominant Saw palmetto Serenoa repens G Dominant Tarflower Bejaria racemosa G Occasional Florida rosemary Ceratiola ericoides G Common Gallberry Ilex glabra G Occasional Rusty lyonia Lyonia fruticose G Occasional Scrub oak Quercus inopina G Occasional Pennyroyal Piloblephis rigida G Occasional 411(E1-E3) - Pine Flatwoods. 29.95 acres in Imperial Pronert Slash pine Pinus elliottii C & M Dominant Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M & G Dominant Occasional Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M & G Dominant Australian Pine Casuarina equisetifolia C Common Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquinervia C, M & G Common Sand live oak Quercus geminate C Occasional Earleaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis C Occasional Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M & G Common Wax myrtle Myrica cerifera M & G Occasional Caesar weed Urena lobate G Occasional Wire grass Aristida stricta G Common Broom grass Andropogon virginicus G Common Saw palmetto Serenoa repens G Occasional Greenbriar Smilax spp. V Occasional Grapevine Vitis rotundifolia V Occasional 411(E4) - Pine Flatwoods Brazilian Penner. 4.38 acres in Imperial Pronert Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Rare Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M & G Dominant Cabbage Palm Sabal palmetto C Occasional Australian Pine Casuarina equisetifolia C Occasional Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M & G Rare Wax myrtle Myrica cerifera M & G Rare 4 to Caesar weed Greenbriar Urena lobate Smilax spp. 414 - Pine - Mesic Oak. 0.89 acres in Imperial Prover Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto Slash pine Pinus elliottii Myrsine Myrsine guianensis 621 (El-E3) - Cypress -13.15 acres in Imperial Property Cypress Taxodium distichum Melaleuca Melaleuca quiquinervia Carolina Willow Salix caroliniana Pond apple Annonna glabra Brazilian Pepper Schinus terebinthifolia Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum Alligator flag Thalia geniculata Royal fern Osmunda regalis 621 (E41 - Cvpress / Melalueca- 0.51 acres in Imperial Propert Cypress Taxodium distichum Melaleuca Melaleuca quiquinervia Slash Pine Pinus elliottii Brazilian Pepper Schinus terebinthifolia Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum 624 - Cvpress-Pine-Cabbage Palm - 3.33 acres in Imperial Proper Cypress Taxodium distichum Slash Pine Pinus elliottii Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum Sawgrass Cladium jamaicense Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 G V C C C M&G C&M C, M & G M&G M&G M G G G C C, M & G C M G C, M, & G C&M C,M&G C&M G G M&G Occasional Common Dominant Dominant Common Common Dominant Common Dominant Common Occasional Common Common Occasional Rare Rare Dominant Rare Common Common Dominant Occasional Common Common Dominant Occasional Common 625 (El-E3)- Hydric Pine Flatwoods - 3.57 acres in Imperial Property Slash pine Pinus elliottii C, M & G Dominant Dahoon holly Ilex cassine C & M Occasional Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M & G Common 5 to Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 Common to Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquinervia C, M & G Dominant Earleaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis C & M Occasional Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M & G Common Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia M Common Wax myrtle Myrica cerifera M Common Coco plum Chrysobalanus icaco M Occasional Saw grass Cladium jamaicense G Occasional Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Common Wire grass Aristida stricta G Occasional 625 (E4)- Hydric Pine Flatwoods / Melaleuca -1.64 acres in Imperial Property Slash pine Pinus elliottii C, M & G Cabbage palm Melaleuca Cypress Myrsine Brazilian pepper Wax myrtle Coco plum Sabal palmetto Melaleuca quinquinervia Taxodium distichum Myrsine guianensis Schinus terebinthifolia Myrica cerifera Chrysobalanus icaco 641- Freshwater Marsh - 0.84 acres in Imperial Property Alligator flag Thalia geniculate Pond apple Annona glabra 2.3 TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE PATTERNS AN C, M & G C M&G M M M G M Occasional Rare Dominant Rare Occcasional Common Occasional Rare Dominant Occasional According to the SFWMD, the project lands as well as surrounding off -site lands are located within the Cocohatchee drainage basin sandwiched between the much larger Estero Bay and West Collier drainage sub -basins. The basin boundary (divide) to the south generally follows Immokalee Road (SR 846) east and west approximately 1.5 miles south of the southern property boundary of the project site. The basin divide to the north generally follows the county boundary about 1 mile to the north. Historically, prior to extensive human development of the area, water generally flowed from northeast to southwest driven by the land elevations dropping toward the Gulf of Mexico. Water generally flows in this same direction but largely via the existing stormwater swales and ponds associated with the surrounding developments. Surface water moves to tide quickly once it reaches the Cocohatchee canal and river. Surface water within the project boundary is not tidally connected and has been isolated and contained by the surrounding development. Once developed, water flow will move towards the river slowly via overland flow through stormwater management lakes, pipes, and swales south and west of the project site. n Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 2.4 WETLANDS & OTHER SURFACE WATERS Qualified Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. (THA) environmental staff inspected the project site for the purpose of delineating wetlands and other surface waters. The wetland delineation methodologies and criteria set forth by the state (in Chapter 62-340, FAC, Delineation of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface Waters) and the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) (in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual) were followed in determining whether an area was considered as a wetland or other surface water and in delineating the limits (boundaries) of potential jurisdictional wetlands and other surface waters. THA biologists flagged the boundaries of those areas which are considered wetlands according to the state and federal guidelines. There were very few cases where it appeared wetland lines established based on the state methodology would differ from those established based on the federal (Corps) methodology. Where this did occur, the feature boundary was flagged based on the landward -most extent of the two methods - in other words, the methodology that produced the greatest extent of wetlands was used to flag the wetland line. Sheet 03 of the enclosed exhibits depicts wetlands present on the project lands. Within the Imperial Lakes property there are 3 distinct wetland areas which are connected to each other through the on -site ponds. These "on -site" wetlands are not individually identified and are treated as one contiguous wetland system. All of the on -site wetlands are jurisdictional to the State of Florida but are not jurisdictional to the Corps of Engineers due to the lack of open water or wetland connectivity to navigable waters. 2.4.1 Wetland Seasonal High -Water Table & Hydroperiod The hydrologic regime on this property is extremely altered from historical levels and patterns by surrounding urban uses. Seasonal high water elevations were determined using water lines, lichen lines, adventitious rooting, and other hydrologic indicators. Nails were placed in several trees at the seasonal high water level indicators and will be later surveyed to determine elevations and help establish final control elevations for the development. The wetland areas are interconnected with each other and the existing ponds. Water flow appears to be from the northeast to the south into the site. Water from adjacent properties is now mostly cut off as a result of the construction of multi -family housing developments and golf courses to the northeast and south, and the school to the east, therefore the wetland hydroperiod is driven by rainfall events. There is standing water in the ponds year-round, however the remainder of the site dries out seasonally before being inundated again during rainy season. There is no natural outfall from the project site. An outfall structure was placed in the southeast portion of the property as part of the 1990 SFWMD permitting effort. When water stages up high enough on the property, it can overflow into the outfall box which directs water into the adjacent golf course lakes. 2.4.2 Jurisdictional Status of Wetlands and Other Surface Waters Almost all of the wetlands now present on the project lands were assumed to be jurisdictional with the SFWMD. The wetland areas within the property are believed to not be jurisdictional to the Corps due to their isolation from navigable waters. Wetlands are all isolated both vegetatively 7 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 and hydrologically by surrounding developments. Flows from the property are via lakes, pipes, and swales through those developments to downstream waters. These on -site wetlands were assumed to not be Corps jurisdictional because of these factors though this determination will still need to be verified by the USACE under a formal jurisdictional determination during their review of the permit applications. The other surface waters present on the property are man-made fill pit ponds excavated in the mid-1980's for fill that was used on nearby projects and sand that was used by the nearby concrete plant. Due to the lack of connectivity via surficial permanent water connections to downstream navigable waters of the U.S. (tidal waters), these OSWs were assumed to be jurisdictional with the SFWMD but not with the Corps. 2.5 NATIVE HABITAT Collier County Land Development Code regulations require that projects preserve a portion of their on -site native habitat as part of their development proposal. Calculations are based on a percentage of the acreage of native habitat existing on the site. Since the Imperial Lakes property is greater than 20 acres in size, it will be required to preserve 25% of the native vegetation on the site. The property is 76.81 acres in size and based on the FLUCFCS mapping 14.64 acres are open water lakes and 14.31 acres are dense exotics, which did not count towards native vegetation totals. The remaining 47.86 acres qualify as existing native vegetation (see Native Vegetation Table Below). The project will be required to preserve 25% of this acreage or a minimum of 11.97 acres. The project is proposing to preserve 15.45 acres of native habitat onsite; therefore, it is compliant with the County LDC preservation requirements of section 3.05.07. Table 2: Native Vegetation Acreages Wetland Habitat FLUCCS Code Imperial Lake Acreage Native Vegetation Acreage Coastal Scrub 322 3.91 3.91 Pine Flatwoods 411 34.33 22.83 Pine - Mesic Oak 414 0.89 0.89 Man-made Ponds 520 14.64 0.00 Cypress 621 13.66 13.15 Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm 624 3.33 3.33 Hydric Pine Flatwoods 625 5.21 2.91 Freshwater Marsh 641 0.84 0.84 76.81 47.86 25% Native Vegetation Retention 11.97 Proposed Onsite Preservation 15.45 Surplus 3.48 1.1 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 2.6 LISTED PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIES Endangered species are as any species of plant, insect, or wildlife naturally occurring in Florida, whose prospects of survival are in jeopardy due to modification or loss of habitat; over -utilization for commercial, sporting, scientific or educational purposes; disease; predation; inadequacy of regulatory mechanisms; or other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence (F.S. 372.072). Threatened species include any species of plant or wildlife naturally occurring in Florida, which may not be in immediate danger of extinction, but which exist in such small populations as to become endangered if it is subjected to increased stress as a result of further modification of its environment. Several listed animal species have the potential to occur onsite. The probability of these animals utilizing suitable habitats ranges from high to low depending on the particular species. It is improbable that most of these species currently reside or nest onsite. A list of potential listed species and their designations are provided below in Table 4. Table 3: Potential Threatened and Endangered Species Common Name Scientific Name Status Eastern indigo snake Drymarchon cou eri FT Gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus ST Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus P Little blue heron Egretta caerulea ST Roseate spoonbill Platalea ajaja ST Tricolored heron Egretta tricolor ST Wood stork Mycteria americana FT Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia ST Florida bonneted bat Eumops floridanus FE FE = Federally Endangered FT = Federally Threatened ST = State Threatened P = Protected FT (S/A) = Federally designated Threatened species due to Similarity of Appearance A survey for listed animal and plant species has been conducted within the project area by THA biologists. This threatened and endangered species survey and its results are discussed in the attached Appendix B. The Threatened & Endangered Species report describes the approximate locations where listed animal species were observed on and near the project area during the course of the survey. During the survey events white ibis (Eudocimus albus), snowy egret (Egretta thula), wood stork (Mycteria americana), and little blue heron (Egretta caerulea) were observed. Several gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrows were located on or in close proximity to the site. More recent survey efforts located 22 burrows within the project boundaries. These burrows will be impacted or isolated by the proposed development and tortoises present will need to be relocated off of the project. Appropriate permits from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) will be obtained prior to construction. None of the other listed species observed reside on or nest within the project area. 6 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 Several listed animal species in addition to those documented on the project lands by TH have some potential for occurring in certain habitats present on project lands. These species are discussed in Appendix B and include; indigo snake, gopher frog, roseate spoonbill, limpkin, burrowing owl, southeastern American kestrel, Big Cypress fox squirrel, Florida bonneted bat, Florida black bear, and Florida panther. The probability of these animals utilizing suitable habitats in project lands ranges from very low to moderate depending upon the particular species (see discussion in Appendix B). It is improbable that any of these species currently reside or nest on the project lands. These listed species records and the source of these records are also discussed in Appendix B. It is highly unlikely that any federally listed plant species could be present on the project lands. Several butterfly orchids (Encyclia tampensis) were observed growing on cypress trees on the project site. These orchids are listed as "less rare' in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The orchids were located within areas proposed to be preserved so no relocation will be required. Due to isolation, exotic species encroachment, off -road vehicle use, and degradation of foraging habitat, it is apparent that this site offers only minimal value to local wildlife. The surrounding developments, golf courses and roads have partially isolated this property and made travel to it by larger terrestrial wildlife difficult. Management plans for Bald eagle, black bear, and gopher tortoises will be coordinated with FWC and FWS as appropriate and provided to the County as part of the site development reviews. 2.7 HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Florida Master Site File (MSF) is a database of the known historic and archaeological sites in the state of Florida. The MSF office was contacted and the response back indicated that there were two recorded archaeological sites in close proximity to the subject property. One of these sites (CR00737) is located right on the northern border of the site. According to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) evaluation, this site was not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The second site (CR00242) is located approximately 3/4 of a mile west of the project site and will not be affected at all by the proposed project. Given the past disturbance and mining of the site, the likelihood of any historical or archaeological site remaining is unlikely. If a suspected archaeological or historical artifact is discovered during the course of site development activities (construction, clearing, etc.), the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. 2.8 SOILS Based on the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) "Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida" (NRCS, 1998) there are five (5) different soil types (soil map units) present on the project lands. Exhibit 9 provides a soils map for the project area as derived from the NRCS mapping. The following sub -sections provide a brief description of each soil map unit identified 10 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 on the project lands. Information is provided about the soil's landscape position (i.e. it's typical location in the landscape on a county -wide basis), the soil's profile (i.e. textural composition and thickness or depth range of the layers or horizons commonly present in the soil), and the soil's drainage and hydrologic characteristics. The soils occurring on project lands are as follows: (25) Cypress Lake -Riviera -Copeland Fine Sands, Frequently Ponded These level, very poorly drained soils are found primarily in depressions, cypress swamps and marshes. This soil mapping unit is found in the southwest corner of the project area within the area identified as wetlands. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape and range from 100 to 3000 acres. The slope is 0 to 1 percent. Typically, the Cypress Lake soil has surface layer of very dark gray fine sand to a depth of about 26 inches; the upper part is light gray and the lower part is brown. The subsoil is dark grayish brown fine sandy loam to a depth of about 30 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 30 inches. Typically, the Riviera soil has a surface layer of gray fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 32 inches; the upper part is light brownish gray and the lower part is light gray. The subsoil is sandy clay loam to a depth of about 54 inches; the upper part is grayish brown and the lower part is dark gray. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 54 inches. Typically, the Copeland soil has a surface layer of black fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 18 inches; the upper part is very dark grayish brown and the lower part is dark gray. The subsoil is light gray mottled, sandy clay loam to a depth of about 24 inches. The substratum is light gray marl to a depth of about 30 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 30 inches. Areas mapped can consist entirely of Cypress lake soil, Riviera, limestone substratum, soil Copeland soil, or any combination of the three soils. These three soils were not separated in mapping because of similar management needs brought about by ponding. The characteristics of Holopaw, Malabar, and Pineda soils are similar. Soils of dissimilar characteristics included in these units are small areas of Basinger, Dania, Gator, and Hallendale soils on similar landscape positions. These soils make up about 20 percent or less of the units. The permeability of the Cypress lake soil is moderate and the available water capacity is very low. The permeability of the Riviera soils is moderately rapid to moderately slow and the available water capacity is low. The permeability of the Copeland soil is moderated and the available water capacity is moderate. In most years, under natural conditions, these soils are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more each year. In other months the water table is within 12 inches of the surface and recedes to a depth of 12 to 40 inches during extended dry periods. 11 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 These soils are not suited for cultivated crops or citrus because of flooding, ponding and wetness. These soils are used for natural wetlands. Natural vegetation consists mostly of bald cypress, pickerelweed, rushes, fire flag, saw grass and Florida willow. The Cypress lake, Riviera and Copeland soils have no range site. These soils are in the Cypress Swamp ecological community. These soils have severe limitations for all urban and recreational uses because of ponding. An effective drainage system that keeps the water table at a given depth is expensive and difficult to establish and maintain. Also, these soils act as a collecting basin for the area; therefore, a suitable outlet to remove the water is not available. These soils require an adequate amount of fill material to maintain house foundations and roadbeds above the high water table. Even when a good drainage system is installed and the proper amount of fill material is added, keeping the area dry is a continuing problem because of seepage water from the slightly higher adjacent sloughs and flatwoods. The Cypress lake, Riviera and Copeland soils are in capability subclass VIIw. (101) Basinger Fine Sand This nearly level, poorly drained soil is in sloughs and poorly defined drainage ways. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape, and they range from 20 to 800 acres in size. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. Typically, the surface layer is grayish brown fine sand about 3 inches thick. The subsurface layer is light brown fine sand to a depth of about 25 inches. The subsoil is brown fine sand to a depth of about 44 inches. The substratum is brown fine sand to a depth of about 80 inches. In 95 percent of the areas mapped as Basinger fine sand, Basinger and similar soils make up 83 to 98 percent of the map unit. In the remaining areas, the Basinger soil makes up either a higher or lower percentage of the mapped areas. The characteristics of Malabar soils are similar to those of the Basinger soil. The dissimilar soils in this map unit are small areas of Immokalee soils on flatwoods. These soils make up 17 percent or less of the map unit. The permeability of this soil is rapid. The available water capacity is low. Under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table is within a depth of 12 inches for 3 to 6 months during most years. During the other months, the water table is below a depth of 12 inches, and it recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. During periods of high rainfall, the soil is covered by shallow, slowly moving water for about 7 days. 12 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 The natural vegetation consists of scattered areas of South Florida slash pine, cypress, cabbage palms, saw palmetto, wax myrtle, blue maidencane, sand cordgrass, pineland threeawn, chalky bluestem, and St. Johns's wort. This soil is poorly suited to cultivated crops because of the wetness and droughtiness. With good water -control and soil -improving measures, this soil is suitable for many fruit and vegetable crops. A water -control system is needed to remove excess water during wet seasons and to provide water through subsurface irrigation during dry seasons. Because of the rapid permeability, the water table is difficult to maintain. Row crops should be rotated with cover crops. Seedbed preparation should include bedding of the rows. Applications of fertilizer and lime should be based on the needs of the crops. With proper water -control measures, the soil is moderately suited to citrus. A water -control system that maintains good drainage to an effective depth is needed. Planting on raised beds provides good surface and internal drainage and elevates the trees above the seasonal high water table. Planting a good grass cover crop between the trees helps to protect the soil from blowing when the trees are younger. With good water -control management, this soil is well suited to pasture. A water -control system is needed to remove excess water during the wet season. This soil is well suited to pangolagrass, bahiagrass, and clover. Excellent pastures of grass or a grass clover mixture can be grown with good management. Regular applications of fertilizer and controlled grazing are needed for the highest possible yields. This soil is well suited to range. The dominant forage consists of blue maidencane, chalky bluestem, and bluejoint panicum. Management practices should include deferred grazing. This Basinger soil is in the Slough range site. This soil has severe limitations for most urban uses because of the high water table. It has severe limitations for septic tank absorption fields because of wetness and poor filtration. Building sites and septic tank absorption fields should be mounded to overcome these limitations. This soil also has severe limitations for recreational development because of wetness and the sandy texture. The problems associated with wetness can be corrected by providing adequate drainage and drainage outlets to control the high water table. The sandy texture can be overcome by adding suitable topsoil or by resurfacing the area. This Basinger soil is in capability subclass IVw. (103) Cypress Lake -Riviera -Copeland Fine Sands, Frequently Ponded-Urban Land Association These level, very poorly drained soils are found primarily in depressions, cypress swamps and marshes. This soil mapping unit is found in the southwest corner of the project area within the area identified as wetlands. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape and range from 100 to 3000 acres. The slope is 0 to 1 percent. 13 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 Typically, the Cypress Lake soil has surface layer of very dark gray fine sand to a depth of about 26 inches; the upper part is light gray and the lower part is brown. The subsoil is dark grayish brown fine sandy loam to a depth of about 30 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 30 inches. Typically, the Riviera soil has a surface layer of gray fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 32 inches; the upper part is light brownish gray and the lower part is light gray. The subsoil is sandy clay loam to a depth of about 54 inches; the upper part is grayish brown and the lower part is dark gray. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 54 inches. Typically, the Copeland soil has a surface layer of black fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 18 inches; the upper part is very dark grayish brown and the lower part is dark gray. The subsoil is light gray mottled, sandy clay loam to a depth of about 24 inches. The substratum is light gray marl to a depth of about 30 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 30 inches. Areas mapped can consist entirely of Cypress lake soil, Riviera, limestone substratum, soil Copeland soil, or any combination of the three soils. These three soils were not separated in mapping because of similar management needs brought about by ponding. The characteristics of Holopaw, Malabar, and Pineda soils are similar. Soils of dissimilar characteristics included in these units are small areas of Basinger, Dania, Gator, and Hallendale soils on similar landscape positions. These soils make up about 20 percent or less of the units. The permeability of the Cypress lake soil is moderate and the available water capacity is very low. The permeability of the Riviera soils is moderately rapid to moderately slow and the available water capacity is low. The permeability of the Copeland soil is moderated and the available water capacity is moderate. In most years, under natural conditions, these soils are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more each year. In other months the water table is within 12 inches of the surface and recedes to a depth of 12 to 40 inches during extended dry periods. These soils are not suited for cultivated crops or citrus because of flooding, ponding and wetness. These soils are used for natural wetlands. Natural vegetation consists mostly of bald cypress, pickerelweed, rushes, fire flag, saw grass and Florida willow. The Cypress lake, Riviera and Copeland soils have no range site. These soils are in the Cypress Swamp ecological community. These soils have severe limitations for all urban and recreational uses because of ponding. An effective drainage system that keeps the water table at a given depth is expensive and difficult to establish and maintain. Also, these soils act as a collecting basin for the area; therefore, a suitable outlet to remove the water is not available. These soils require an adequate amount of fill material 14 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 to maintain house foundations and roadbeds above the high water table. Even when a good drainage system is installed and the proper amount of fill material is added, keeping the area dry is a continuing problem because of seepage water from the slightly higher adjacent sloughs and flatwoods. The Cypress lake, Riviera and Copeland soils are in capability subclass VIIw. (117) Immokalee Fine Sand This nearly level, poorly drained soil is on flatwoods. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape, and they range from 10 to 500 acres in size. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. Typically, the surface layer is black fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is light gray fine sand to a depth of about 35 inches. The subsoil is fine sand to a depth of about 58 inches. The upper part of the subsoil is black, the next part is dark reddish brown, and the lower part is dark brown. The substratum is pale brown fine sand to a depth of about 80 inches. In 95 percent of the areas mapped as Immokalee fine sand, Immokalee and similar soils make up 89 to 99 percent of the map unit. In the remaining areas, the Immokalee soil makes up either a higher or lower percentage of the mapped areas. The characteristics of Myakka and Oldsmar soils are similar to those of the Immokalee soil. The dissimilar soils in this map unit are small areas of Basinger and Holopaw soils in sloughs. These soils make up about 1 to 11 percent of the unit. The permeability of this soil is moderate. The available water capacity is low. Under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table is at a depth of 6 to 18 inches for 1 to 6 months during most years. During the other months, the water table is below a depth of 18 inches, and it recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. The natural vegetation consists of South Florida slash pine, saw palmetto, wax myrtle, chalky bluestem, creeping bluestem, and pineland threeawn. This soil is poorly suited to cultivated crops because of the wetness and droughtiness. The number of adapted crops is limited unless very intensive management practices are used. With good water -control and soil -improving measures, this soil is suitable for many fruit and vegetable crops. A water -control system is needed to remove excess water during wet seasons and to provide water through subsurface irrigation during dry seasons. Row crops should be rotated with cover crops. Seedbed preparation should include bedding of the rows. Applications of fertilizer and lime should be based on the needs of the crops. With proper water -control measures, the soil is well suited to citrus. A water -control system that maintains good drainage to an effective depth is needed. Planting on raised beds provides good surface and internal drainage and elevates the trees above the seasonal high water table. Planting 15 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 a good grass cover crop between the trees helps to protect the soil from blowing when the trees are younger. With good water -control management, this soil is well suited to pasture. A water -control system is needed to remove excess water during the wet season. This soil is well suited to pangolagrass, bahiagrass, and clover. Excellent pastures of grass or a grass -clover mixture can be grown with good management. Regular applications of fertilizer and controlled grazing are needed for the highest possible yields. This soil is moderately suited to range. The dominant forage consists of creeping bluestem, lopsided indiangrass, pineland threeawn, and chalky bluestem. Management practices should include deferred grazing and brush control. This Immokalee soil is in the South Florida Flatwoods range site. This soil has severe limitations for most urban uses and septic tank absorption fields because of the wetness. If this soil is used as a septic tank absorption field, it should be mounded to maintain the system well above the seasonal high water table. For recreational uses, this soil also has severe limitations because of wetness and the sandy texture; however, with proper drainage to remove excess surface water during wet periods, many of the effects of these limitations can be overcome. This Immokalee soil is in capability subclass IVw. (132) Rivera, Limestone Substratum, Copeland Fine Sand, Urban Land Association These level, very poorly drained soils are found primarily in flatwoods and depressions on marine terraces. This soil mapping unit is found in the southwest corner of the project area within the area identified as wetlands. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape and range from 100 to 3000 acres. The slope is 0 to 1 percent. Typically, the Riviera soil has a surface layer of gray fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 32 inches; the upper part is light brownish gray and the lower part is light gray. The subsoil is sandy clay loam to a depth of about 54 inches; the upper part is grayish brown and the lower part is dark gray. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 54 inches. Typically, the Copeland soil has a surface layer of black fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 18 inches; the upper part is very dark grayish brown and the lower part is dark gray. The subsoil is light gray mottled, sandy clay loam to a depth of about 24 inches. The substratum is light gray marl to a depth of about 30 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 30 inches. Areas mapped are generally around 36 percent Rivera, 30 percent Urban, and 27 percent Copeland. These three soils were not separated in mapping because of similar management needs brought about by ponding. The characteristics of Holopaw, Malabar, and Pineda soils are similar. 16 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 The permeability of the Riviera soil is moderately rapid to moderately slow, and the available water capacity is low. The permeability of the Copeland soil is moderate, and the available water capacity is moderate. In most years, under natural conditions, these soils are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more each year. In other months the water table is within 12 inches of the surface and recedes to a depth of 12 to 40 inches during extended dry periods. These soils are not suited for cultivated crops or citrus because of flooding, ponding and wetness. These soils are used for natural wetlands. Natural vegetation consists mostly of bald cypress, pickerelweed, rushes, fire flag, saw grass and Florida willow. These soils have severe limitations for all urban and recreational uses because of ponding. An effective drainage system that keeps the water table at a given depth is expensive and difficult to establish and maintain. Also, these soils act as a collecting basin for the area; therefore, a suitable outlet to remove the water is not available. These soils require an adequate amount of fill material to maintain house foundations and roadbeds above the high water table. Even when a good drainage system is installed and the proper amount of fill material is added, keeping the area dry is a continuing problem because of seepage water from the slightly higher adjacent sloughs and flatwoods. The, Riviera Urban and Copeland soils are in capability subclass VIIw. (133) Satellite Fine Sand This nearly level, somewhat poorly drained soil is on low coastal ridges. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape, and they range from 10 to 400 acres in size. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. Typically, the surface layer is gray fine sand about 3 inches thick. The substratum is light gray to white fine sand to a depth of about 80 inches. In 95 percent of the areas mapped as Satellite fine sand, the Satellite soil makes up 81 to 100 percent of the map unit. In the remaining areas, it makes up either a higher or lower percentage of the mapped areas. The dissimilar soils in this map unit are small areas of Oldsmar soils in landscape positions similar to those of the Satellite soil. The permeability of this soil is very rapid. The available water capacity is very low. Under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table is at a depth of 18 to 42 inches for 1 to 6 months during most years. During the other months, the water table is below a depth of 40 inches. The natural vegetation consists of Florida rosemary, sand live oak, South Florida slash pine, saw palmetto, prickly pear, pineland threeawn, and creeping bluestem. This soil is poorly suited to 17 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 cultivated crops because of the droughtiness. The number of adapted crops is limited unless very intensive management practices are used. With good water -control and soil -improving measures, this soil is suitable for many fruit and vegetable crops. A water -control system is needed to remove excess water during wet seasons and to provide water through subsurface irrigation during dry seasons. Because of the rapid permeability, the water table is difficult to maintain. Row crops should be rotated with cover crops. Seedbed preparation should include bedding of the rows. Applications of fertilizer and lime should be based on the needs of the crops. With proper water -control measures, the soil is well suited to citrus. A water -control system that maintains good drainage to an effective depth is needed. Planting on raised beds provides good surface and internal drainage and elevates the trees above the seasonal high water table. Planting a good grass cover crop between the trees helps to protect the soil from blowing when the trees are younger. The soil is moderately suited to pasture. Pangolagrass and bahiagrass are adapted species, but they produce only fair yields with good management. Regular applications of fertilizer and controlled grazing are needed for the highest possible yields. This soil is poorly suited to range. The dominant forage consists of creeping bluestem, lopsided indiangrass, pineland threeawn, and chalky bluestem. The dense growth of scrubby oaks, saw palmetto, and other shrubs dominates the desirable forage. Management practices should include deferred grazing and brush control. Livestock usually do not use this range site, except for protection as dry -bedding ground during the wet seasons. This Satellite soil is in the Sand Pine Scrub range site. This soil has severe limitations for most urban uses because of wetness and droughtiness. It has severe limitations for septic tank absorption fields because of wetness and poor filtration. If this soil is used as a septic tank absorption field, it should be mounded to maintain the system well above the seasonal high water table. For recreational uses, this soil also has severe limitations because of wetness and the sandy texture; however with proper drainage to remove excess surface water during wet periods, many of the effects of the wetness can be overcome. Suitable topsoil or other material should be added to improve trafficability. This Satellite soil is in capability subclass VIs. IM TABLE 4. IMPERIAL LAKES PROJECT CUMULATIVE ACREAGE SUMMARY LAND TYPES IMPERIAL LAKES PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPOSED PROTECT -PROPERTY ACREAGE EXISTING CONDITIONS Total Area 78.28 Acres Road Right of Way 1.47 Acres Project Site 76.81 Acres Existing Wetlands &Waters Wetlands 23.04 Acres OSW 14.64 Acres man-made fill it ponds) TOTAL Wetlands &Waters 37.68 Acres Uplands 39.13 Acres PROPOSED PROTECT ACREAGE Wetlands to be Impacted Wetland Impacts Direct 9.29 Wetland Impacts Secondary 2.07 TOTAL Wetlands to be Impacted 11.36 Acres Uplands to be Developed 37.43 Acres Wetlands &Waters to be Enhanced and Preserved Wetlands 13.75 Acres Uplands to be Enhanced and Preserved Uplands 1.70 Acres TOTAL Lands Preserved 15.45 Acres Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 3 PROPOSED CONDITIONS POST DEVELOPMENT) 3.1 PROPOSED PROJECT The purpose of the proposed Imperial Lakes project is to develop a new residential community within the northern Collier County area. The location of the project is in a region where there is currently a demand for upscale home sites with access to community amenities such are found in the northern Collier County area (access to beaches, golf courses, shopping, etc.). Various acreage estimates for the proposed project are provided in Table 4 below. 19 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 The proposed project will impact a portion of the existing wetlands on the development site (approximately 9.29 acres of direct impacts and 2.07 acres of secondary impacts). The wetlands that will be directly impacted have been degraded to varying degrees by exotic vegetation infestations and alteration of the hydrology on -site and off -site. The enclosed exhibit (Sheet 06) illustrates the wetlands that will be impacted by development. 3.2 PROJECT IMPACTS TO WETLANDS 3.2.1 Direct, Permanent Impacts Development of the proposed project cannot be done without impacting some wetlands. The location of the wetlands across the project site are spread throughout the project area. The proposed development will result in direct, permanent impacts on the project site to a total of 9.29 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and 2.07 acres of secondary impacts. Please see attached Exhibit (Sheet 06) for more detail. As used herein, the term "direct impacts" refers to actions that will result in the complete elimination of jurisdictional areas (i.e. dredging and filling). The remainder of the existing wetlands on -site will be preserved (13.75 acres which includes the secondary impacted areas). The wetlands proposed to be impacted are all somewhat degraded by exotic vegetation. The proposed project is occurring on a site which has been heavily impacted by past mining and off -road vehicle activities. The wetlands proposed to be impacted are relatively low functioning wetlands due to these past impacts and the exotic vegetation infestation. UMAM scores for the existing functional values of these wetlands range from 0.30-0.63. The wetlands to be preserved on the eastern side of the property are contiguous to off -site preserve associated with the high school and eagle nest tree. The wetlands to be preserved internal to the development adjacent to the existing man-made fill pit ponds are of the highest quality and diversity. Transient use of these wetlands by wading birds will continue to be available within the preserves proposed. 3.2.2 Temporary Impacts Minimal temporary impacts are expected with this development. Prior to construction commencement all preserved areas will be enclosed with siltation -prevention devices, which will remain in place until the adjacent construction is completed. Temporary impacts may occur within the preserve areas as a result of the exotic removal activities. Any impacts will be restored immediately following the exotic removal. 3.2.3 Secondary Impacts to Wetlands and Water Resources The proposed layout of the project's development features will result in 2.07 acres of secondary impacts due to encroachment of the development. Secondary impacts were calculated for those wetland areas where there is not a minimum 25 foot naturally vegetated upland buffer between the development and the wetland. This is consistent with the State's Environmental Resource 20 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 Permitting guidelines. The proposed wetland and upland preserve along the eastern boundary will prevent additional secondary impacts to any off -site wetland areas. 3.2.4 Cumulative Impacts to Wetlands Most of the lands around the proposed project lands have already been developed with a mix of residential and golf course construction. There are two remaining partially undeveloped properties to the southwest of the proposed project which are part of the concrete plant. The two properties to the north and west are lands purchased under the Conservation Collier program and are currently designated as the Railhead Scrub Preserve so future development of these parcels is not anticipated. As such, no adverse cumulative impacts are anticipated with the currently proposed project. Mitigation for the project will comply with the State guidelines and be purchased from a mitigation bank that has a service area covering the project site. If an out -of - basin mitigation bank is used, the appropriate proximity factor as outlined in SB 492. 3.3 PRESERVATION OF WETLANDS, OTHER SURFACE WATERS, AND UPLANDS Development of the proposed Imperial Lakes project will impact 9.29 acres of the existing wetlands within the property boundaries. The proposed project will impact predominately disturbed, exotic infested habitat areas on the property. Higher quality native wetland areas will be preserved. All of the preserved areas will be enhanced through the removal of exotic vegetation and improvements to hydrology. The proposed Imperial Lakes project will include 4 conservation areas within the project boundaries which will contain preserved and enhanced wetlands and uplands. These conservation areas will include the two cypress domes adjacent to the existing pit ponds, the wet flatwood habitat in the northeast corner of the property, and the buffer zone around the eagle nest tree along the eastern boundary. The attached Exhibits (Sheet 07) illustrate the location of the proposed conservation areas. The preserved wetlands will be hydrologically connected to the stormwater management lakes within the development. Once water quality treatment criteria have been met, water can enter into the wetlands from the lakes and contribute to the hydrologic connectivity and health of the wetlands. All of the preserved areas will be placed under appropriate conservation easements as required, which will protect the future integrity of the wetland and upland habitats contained in these areas. Appropriate access easements will also be provided to ensure future maintenance of the preserved areas can be undertaken. All preserve areas will be delineated and marked with appropriate signage identifying the preserve boundary and restrictions associated with the preserve. Signage will be placed at least 150 feet apart and no more than 300 feet apart along all interfaces with the development. Signage will not be placed along the shared borders with existing Conservation lands or lakes. 21 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 3.4 PROJECT IMPACT TO LISTED SPECIES A survey for listed animal and plant species was initially conducted on the project site by THA biologists in 2014 and updated in late 2016/early 2017 and more recently in 2024/2025. The listed animals associated with this project site as observed directly or indirectly by THA included the white ibis, snowy egret, wood stork, and little blue heron. During the initial surveys conducted in 2014, several gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrows were also located on -site. More recent survey updates have located 22 burrows within the Imperial Lakes property and several more within the adjacent roadway ROW. These burrows will be impacted or isolated by the proposed site plan and will need to be relocated. Appropriate permits from FWC will be required prior to any land clearing activities. A small alligator was also documented in the northern pond. Currently there is one documented active eagle's nests within very close proximity of the project site. Nest number C0071 is located along the eastern property boundary between this project site and the adjacent high school. This nest was documented as active in 2024/25 nesting season. Additionally, nest number C00047 is located approximately 0.5 miles to the south and was last documented as active in 2014. And nest C0001 is located approximately 1 mile to the southwest of the project site and was last documented as active in 2015. A few listed animal species, in addition to those documented, have the potential to occur in certain habitats present on -site. These species include but are not limited to the indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi), tricolor heron (Egretta tricolor), roseate spoonbill (Platalea ajaja), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger), and Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus). The probability of these animals utilizing suitable on -site habitats ranges from high to low depending on the particular species. It is improbable that any of these species currently reside or nest on -site. The following subsections provide an assessment of the proposed project's potential impacts to various listed animal species. The species addressed include those observed on or in close proximity to the subject property as well as certain species that could potentially occur on the Imperial Lakes site or on nearby off -site parcels. Wood Storks (Mt/cteria americans) No wood stork nests, rookeries, or roosting sites have been found on the subject property though one wood stork was observed foraging in the freshwater marsh area during the listed species investigations. The closest documented wood stork colony is located approximately 11 miles to the northeast at Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary. The site is appropriate for foraging within the littoral zone of the existing man-made fill pit ponds, cypress habitats, and freshwater marsh habitats. The small cypress area immediately adjacent to the open waters of the pit pond could be appropriate for establishment of a small rookery. This cypress area adjacent to the existing pond will be preserved under the current project proposal. The proposed project will impact 9.29 acres of wetlands on -site, however these areas are of lower value foraging habitat for the wood stork. The foraging opportunities provided can vary significantly during a given year due to a wide array of factors that include but are not limited to: water levels present; variable abundance of prey species; and available access of prey species 22 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 to wetland areas. The proposed wetland preserve area will result in the preservation and enhancement of suitable wood stork foraging habitats. Proposed Determination of Effect: Given these considerations, use of the USFWS Wood Stork Key, outlined in the USFWS South Florida Programmatic Concurrence Letter dated January 25, 2010 and the May 18, 2010 addendum, to conduct a sequential effect determination for the species resulted in the following key sequential determination: A-B-C-E-NLAA and it is concluded that the proposed project "may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect" wood storks (MANLAA). Various Listed Wading Birds Snowy egrets (Egretta thula), little blue herons (Egretta caerulea), and white ibis (Eudocimus alba) have been documented in the wetlands on -site and within the vicinity of the site. No nests of these species have been observed within the project area. In addition to the observed species, other listed wading birds that could frequent appropriate habitats within the project area include roseate spoonbills (Platalea ajaja), tricolor herons (Egretta tricolor), and limpkins (Aramus guarauna). Development of the project area will result in the loss of 9.29 acres of on -site wetlands that could be utilized by the wading birds mentioned, though it is important to note that the majority of these wetlands are infested by dense exotic vegetation and do not provide high quality foraging opportunities. The on -site preserve will enhance and protect 13.75 acres of appropriate on -site habitats that could be utilized by foraging wading birds in addition to maintaining the lake shorelines where the majority of foraging activities have been observed. Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus Polyphemus) There are two suitable gopher tortoise habitat areas on this site. Both areas are coastal scrub and dominated by saw palmetto, scrub oak, and other upland shrubs. The larger of the two areas is located on the northwest corner of the property and contains a majority (all except for 2) of the burrows observed on site. All documented burrows located were georeferenced by handheld GPS and are shown on the attached Listed Species Observations Exhibit. A summary of the results gives; Potentially Occupied burrows -16 Abandoned burrows - 6 Total burrows - 22 To estimate the population of tortoises actually on the site a correction factor is applied to the number of active plus inactive burrows. The correction factor reflects the habitat type and the estimated utilization of burrows across the site. Using the FWC protocols of 0.50 times the number of potentially occupied burrows results in (16 * 0.50 = 8) tortoises on -site. However, based on our site analysis we believe the number could be closer to 60% of the burrows on site, which would increase the number of tortoises to (16*0.60=10). 23 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 Relocation methods will involve a combination of mechanical and hand digging. All burrows will be surveyed again prior to relocation and all active and inactive burrows within the proposed development footprint will be excavated. Where mechanical methods are employed (digging with a small backhoe), digging by hand will take over during the last few feet. Any tortoise burrow that lies within the proposed upland preserve and is greater than 25 feet from the proposed impacts will be left undisturbed. Proposed Determination of Effect: The gopher tortoise was listed as threatened by the FWC in 2007. While it is not federally listed, it is a candidate for listing and protected under the current State of Florida regulations. Coordination with the FWC and adherence with all state guidelines will ensure that that no adverse impacts occur to the gopher tortoise. Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais coy eri� No indigo snakes have been observed on -site, however the majority of the project area does provide suitable habitat for indigo snakes. Considering their elusive nature, their large home range, and the wide array of habitats they may utilize, there is potential that indigo snakes could occasionally frequent portions of the project area. The presence of gopher tortoise burrows observed during the surveys conducted on the project site indicate that there is potential for indigo snake utilization on -site, as well as the presence of suitable habitats. Proposed Determination of Effect: In consideration of these points and given the potential probability of any indigo snakes occurring on the project lands, use of the USFWS Eastern Indigo Snake Key outlined in the USFWS' North and South Florida Programmatic Concurrence Letter, dated January 25, 2010 and the August 13, 2013 Addendum, to conduct a sequential effect determination for the species resulted in the following key sequential determination: A-B-C-D-E- NLAA and results in a "May affect, not likely to adversely affect" determination for this species. Florida Bonneted Bat (Eumops oridanus) The Florida bonneted bat (FBB) utilizes habitats such as hardwoods and pinelands for foraging. The project area consists of pine flatwoods, pine-mesic oak, and cypress -pine -palm habitats suitable for Florida bonneted bat foraging though it is important to note that much of this habitat is densely infested with exotic vegetation which would preclude bat flight through the forested areas. Much of this habitat will be impacted with the development of the proposed project, however, following the enhancement activities, the entire preserve area will consist of open forested habitat suitable (1.70 acres of pine flatwoods, 8.28 acres of cypress wetlands, 1.22 acres of cypress -pine -cabbage palm, and 3.42 acres of hydric pine) that will be restored to open forested habitats) for Florida bonneted bat foraging. The project will also preserve and maintain 0.83 acre of freshwater marsh. The project site is located within the FBB consultation area but is not located within any of the Focal Areas that have been designated by FWS. 24 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 Surveys of the site have been conducted to search for potential roosts. Cavity trees observed were peeped to determine if any roosting was present. To date no evidence of any bat presence on the site has been observed. Proposed Determination of Effect: Based on our analysis of the existing conditions of the site, the proposed, enhanced, open forested preserve areas, and the lack of any documented FBB presence, our use of the USFWS Florida Bonneted Bat Consultation Key provided in the USFWS' Florida Bonneted Bat Consultation Guidelines, 2024 Revision resulted in the following key sequential determination: 1a-2a-3c-4b-9b-11a-NLAA with required BMPs and results in a "May affect, not likely to adversely affect" determination for this species as long as appropriate BMPS are enacted within the development. Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus !t erg The Big Cypress Fox Squirrel has not been observed on -site or in the ROW, however they have been known to utilize habitats such as cypress, cypress -pine -cabbage palm, and pine flatwoods that do exist on the project site. They are also documented on the golf courses to the south and northeast of the project site. Much of the habitat has been infested with dense exotic vegetation which precludes fox squirrel use and foraging. The proposed project would result in impacts to 5.39 acres of cypress, 2.11 acres of cypress -pine -cabbage palm, and 1.79 acres of hydric pine flatwoods. Fox squirrels have been shown in many locations to prefer suburban habitats including golf courses and low -density residential areas. The area surrounding the Imperial Lakes project does contain golf courses and residential components. There are suitable preferred habitats on -site as well, a portion of which will be preserved (1.70 acres of pine flatwoods, 8.28 acres of cypress wetlands,1.22 acres of cypress -pine - cabbage palm, and 3.42 acres of hydric pine). The preserve habitats will be enhanced for fox squirrel utilization through the elimination of exotic vegetation and the opening up of the site through said removal. With the preservation and enhancement of suitable habitat and the proximity of the preserves to the adjacent open golf course, little effect to the Big Cypress fox squirrel is expected. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) There is an eagle nest located along the eastern property line of the project site. A 330 foot buffer will be left around the nest tree and development will be timed so that work between 660 and 330 feet of the nest tree will be done outside of the eagle nesting season. Proposed Determination of Effect: Eagle nesting and utilization has been documented on the project site. Since the proposed development is less than 660 feet from the eagle nest tree, permitting under the Bald and Golden Eagle protection act will likely be required. The project will pursue an incidental take permit from the FWS for development impacts within the 660 to 330 foot buffer around the nest. The 330 foot buffer around the nest will be cleared of exotic vegetation and preserved as natural habitat. 25 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 3.5 PROJECT IMPACTS TO ARCHAEOLOGICAWHISTORICAL RESO CES The Florida Master Site File (MSF) is a database of the known historic and archaeological sites in the state of Florida. The MSF office was contacted and the response back indicated that there were two recorded archaeological sites in close proximity to the subject property. One of these sites (CR00737) is located right on the northern border of the site. According to the MSF this site is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The second recorded site is located approximately 3/4 of a mile west of the project site near US 41 and will not be impacted at all by the proposed project. Should any archaeological evidence be discovered during construction, the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. 26 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 4 AVOID E AND MINIMIZATION OF WETLAND IMPACTS Alternative Site Plans The applicant has made all appropriate and practicable steps to minimize impacts to existing jurisdictional wetlands. The final site plan as presented in this document shows that the majority of the higher quality natural wetlands within the project boundary have been avoided. The wetland preserves will be avoided and tied into the project's surface water management system so that hydrology is maintained and improved over the current conditions. The preservation of upland and wetland areas along the eastern boundary will provide a buffer between the development and the adjacent eagle nest tree. Avoidance During; Construction During construction, appropriate best management practices will be employed to help protect water quality and avoid the discharge of sediments and/or turbid water from the project site into both the on -site and off -site wetlands. The specific erosion/sediment/turbidity control methods and devices used will conform to applicable standards and criteria set forth in the "FDER Florida Development Manual," Sections 6-301 through 6-500 (FDER. 1988. "The Florida Development Manual: A Guide to Sound Land and Water Management," Chapter 6: "Storm Water and Erosion Control Best Management Practices for Developing Areas; Guidelines for Using Erosion and Sediment Control Practices," ES BMP 1.01-1.67. FDER, Tallahassee, FL.). These methods will also conform to applicable standards and guidelines set forth in the "Florida Stormwater, Erosion, and Sedimentation Control Inspector's Manual" (FDEP, 2002). The boundaries of all the wetland areas adjacent to the construction activities will be delineated with silt fencing in order to clearly identify the wetland areas and to protect them from inadvertent impacts or encroachment by the machinery during project construction. Preserve Management Plan The Imperial Lakes project has proposed to establish on -site preserve areas to minimize wetland impacts associated with the proposed residential development. The project will also undertake enhancement activities within the preserved areas which will improve the functional value of the wetlands and ensure that no long-term impacts will occur as a result of the proposed development activities. A Management Plan for the short and long-term enhancement and maintenance activities will be created and submitted for review at the time of the site development plan approval. 27 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 5 PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH COME The following Section outlines how the project is consistent with the Goals and Objectives of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Each of the 13 Goals of the CCME is listed along with how that Goal is applicable to the proposed project. For those Goals that are not applicable, no further description is included. GOAL 1: TO PLAN FOR THE PROTECTION, CONSERVATION, MANAGEMENT AND APPROPRIATE USE OF THE COUNTY'S NATURAL RESOURCES. This Goal is more applicable to the County process in general than to any single project. The project has used data available from the County resources to plan the project and protect species, habitats, and resources to the greatest extent practicable. GOAL 2: TO PROTECT THE COUNTY'S SURFACE AND ESTUARINE WATER RESOURCES. The Project will undergo review by the South Florida Water Management District as part of the ERP process. The project will also be reviewed by County reviewers during the PUD and SDP applications. Surface water management, water quality concerns, and outfall quantities and locations will all undergo review and will be consistent with any regional or local Watershed Management Plans. The Project stormwater will meet all applicable State and Local water quality criteria. GOAL 3: TO PROTECT THE COUNTY'S GROUND WATER RESOURCES TO ENSURE THE HIGHEST WATER QUALITY PRACTICAL. The Project will undergo review by the South Florida Water Management District as part of the ERP process. Groundwater extractions for the purposes of irrigation may be permitted upon SFWMD review. Any irrigation use will be monitored to ensure that adverse impacts to groundwater resources are not adversely impacted. GOAL 4: TO CONSERVE, PROTECT AND APPROPRIATELY MANAGE THE COUNTY'S FRESH WATER RESOURCES. The Project will undergo review by the South Florida Water Management District as part of the ERP process. Groundwater extractions for the purposes of irrigation may be permitted upon SFWMD review. If applicable and available, the Project will utilize treated effluent (re -use) water for irrigation. GOAL 5: TO PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE THE COUNTY'S MINERAL AND SOIL RESOURCES. The Project site was formerly permitted as a mining operation and the resultant lakes will be incorporated into the Project stormwater management system under the current residential development proposal. No future mineral extraction is contemplated on the Project property. 0. Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 The Project will utilize appropriate BMPs to protect soils on the project site from erosion or disturbance during construction activities. Silt fencing, protective barriers, berms, and swales could all be used during construction activities on the site. GOAL 6: TO IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. The Project as proposed is consistent with Goal 6 and its objectives specifically; Objective 6.1 - The Project will preserve a minimum of 25% of the existing native habitat on the project site. The property contains 47.86 acres of native vegetation and is required to preserve a minimum of 11.97 acres. As proposed, the project will preserve 15.45 acres of native habitats. In addition, the areas proposed for preservation meet the hierarchy standards of this Objective in that the areas are utilized by listed species and do include the higher functional wetlands. Because of the separation of the high -quality areas by water and dense exotic vegetation, the preserves are not interconnected within the site. One of the preserve areas is contiguous with offsite lands to the east while the remaining three preserves are completely contained within the development area. Objective 6.2 - The Project will preserve higher quality functional wetlands within the project boundary and will appropriately mitigate for lost functions through purchase of mitigation credits from an approved wetland mitigation bank. Valuation of the functionality of the wetlands to be impacted and the mitigation requirements will be reviewed by both the SFWMD and the USACE as part of the ERP review process. Preservation of the higher quality wetland habitats will be a priority for the state and federal permitting agencies. Objective 6.5 - The Project is adjacent to the Conservation Collier Railhead preserve lands. Appropriate buffers and setbacks from construction activities on the project site will be maintained from this existing adjacent preserve. GOAL 7: TO PROTECT AND CONSERVE THE COUNTY'S FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. The Project as proposed is consistent with Goal 7 and its objectives specifically; Objective 7.1 - The Project has conducted a Protected Species Survey over the Project lands. This survey will be updated periodically during the permitting process to ensure that new species do not take up residence on the Project lands without knowledge. Lands known to be inhabited by listed species, such as the eagle nest tree along the east property line of the project have been proposed for preservation. Species Management Plans will be completed for the Project which will outline how the proposed project can move forward while minimizing the risk of adversely impacting any protected species. Coordination and review with both the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) will be undertaken to ensure that potential impacts to state and federally protected species are minimized. GOAL 8: TO MAINTAIN COLLIER COUNTY'S EXISTING AIR QUALITY. The Project will comply with all applicable State and Federal air quality standards. All site construction equipment will be maintained appropriately in terms of emissions standards and potential air pollution. 29 Imperial Lakes Environmental Supplement October 2025 GOAL 9: TO APPROPRIATELY MANAGE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE TO PROTECT THE COUNTY'S POPULOUS AND NATURAL RESOURCES AND TO ENSURE THE HIGHEST ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. This Goal is more applicable to County efforts than to individual projects. Consistent with Objective 9.3, the project will encourage resident participation in hazardous waste collection days to try and help ensure that household hazardous wastes are disposed of properly in coordination with the County's efforts. GOAL 10: TO PROTECT, CONSERVE, MANAGE, AND APPROPRIATELY USE THE COUNTY'S COASTAL BARRIERS INCLUDING SHORELINES, BEACHES AND DUNES AND PLAN FOR, AND WHERE APPROPRIATE, RESTRICT ACTIVITIES WHERE SUCH ACTIVITIES WILL DAMAGE OR DESTROY COASTAL RESOURCES. This Project will not affect any coastal barriers, dunes, beaches, shorelines, or any other coastal resources. GOAL 11: TO PROVIDE FOR THE PROTECTION, RESERVATION, AND SENSITIVE RE- USE OF HISTORIC RESOURCES. This Project will not affect any historical or archaeological properties or resources. GOAL 12: TO MAKE EVERY REASONABLE EFFORT TO ENSURE THE PUBLIC SAFETY, HEALTH AND WELFARE OF PEOPLE AND PROPERTY FROM THE EFFECTS OF HURRICANE STORM DAMAGE. The Project is not located within the County's Coastal High Hazard Area. All building construction on the Project will be subject to building code regulation and will adhere to construction standards with respect to wind loadings and hurricane protection. On -site construction will have a hurricane preparedness plan outlining steps to follow should a hurricane approach while site construction is under way. GOAL 13: TO AVOID UNNECESSARY DUPLICATION OF EXISTING REGULATORY PROGRAMS. The Project will undergo review by the SFWMD, the USACE, the FWC, and the FWS. All correspondence and permitting undertaken with these agencies will be provided to the County upon request to assist with County review and minimize duplication of permitting efforts. 30 APPENDIX A: EXHIBITS S—F^—FE OF FLC)P.,ID^ 11 EVERGLADES CITY COLLIER COUNTY SUBJECT 70FT.MYERQS VNAPLAS MIA I D' KEY WEST v- -#'-Q SITE ADDRESS <>00146640104,00145720106,00146080007,00153160 —NAPLES.FL NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURP AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION — LATITUDE: N 26.298232 — LONGITUDE: W -81.787992 Buup Ran pub Caa/�fev4 'ur WCA.Ukri-Vd h Rd O'l VICINITY MAP COUNTY AERIAL 1-19 DESIGNED: TH I Twell, Hall & Associates, Inc. I M F> I—= FZ I A I— LAKES DRAWN BY RMJ 2. Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED 07-31-25 3 JOB NO, 7372 4. )��3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 LOCATION MAP SHEET NO. 01 OF 13 1 I Email: tunaCawnell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E ROADWAY DEDICATION (1.47 AC)�'f,. 25500 1000 SC�fLE 9N ��2:7 I I SUBJECT I PROPERTY NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "Q. GRADY MINOR' SURVEY DATED: 8-19-13 DESIGNED: TH 1, Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. I M P S IR I A L L A K E S DRAWN BY: RMJ 2. Marine 0- Enviroment, 1 Consulting CREATED: 07-31-25 3. OG 1: 1 l� 1 JOB NO.: 1342 4. P2��773584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 EXISTING AERIAL SHEET NO.: 102 OF 13 5. Email:tllna®tall-associates.com Phone:(239) 643.0166 Fax: (239)643.6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E 322 411 E2 ROADWAY DEDICATION (1.47 AC) 625 SUBJECT PROPERTY 411E4 621 322 624E2 520 411E2 - 621 641 --621E3 Zol 621E4 411 621 E2 520 621 625 414 621 E2 i 641 411E4 411E3 411 E 621 E2 J —v w S 0 250 500 +ol JC7{LE 9N �EE� FLUCCS DESCRIPTION AREA (AC) 322 COASTAL SCRUB 3.91 411 PINE FLATWOODS 0.96 411 E2 PINE FLATWOODS 15.77 411E3 PINE FLATWOODS 6.10 411E4 PINE FLATWOODS 11.50 414 PINE & MESIC OAK 0.89 520 LAKES 14.64 621 CYPRESS 4.63 621 E2 CYPRESS 8.05 621 E3 CYPRESS 0.47 621 E4 CYPRESS 0.51 624E2 CYPRESS -PINE -CABBAGE PALM 3.33 625 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 1.31 625E2 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 1.60 625E4 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 2.30 641 FRESHWATER MARSHES 0.84 TOTAL 76.81 EXOTICS NOTE: E1: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING <25% EXOTIC SPECIES. E2: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING 25-50 % EXOTIC SPECIES. E3: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING 50-75 % EXOTIC SPECIES. E4: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING>75% EXOTIC SPECIES. Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. DESIGNED TH 2. M P E R I A L L A K E S DRAWN D: RMJ 2. Marne 9 LnYlr01)men 1 Consulting g CREATED: 1342 25 3. OG 1: 1 l� 1 JOB NO.: 1342 4. IP2��773584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 SITE F L U C C S MAP SHEET NO.: 03 OF 13 5. Email:tuna®tall-associates.com Phene:(239) 643.0166 Fax: (239)643.6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25F UPLAND (ACRES): 39.13 ® WETLAND (ACRES): 23.04 OSW (ACRES): 14.64 PROJECT (ACRES): 76.81 NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "Q. GRADY MINOR" SURVEY DATED: 8-19-13 1 — — 322 411 E2 625E4 411 E4 621 322 624E2 520 411 E4 411E2 621 641 520 411 621 E 621 625 414 6 21 E2 641 411E3 1 E 621 E2 —v w Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Marine & Environmental Consulting P2��>�358Mxchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 Email: tuna®tall-assoeiates.00m Phone: (239) 643.0166 Fax: (239) 643.6632 r3.C';1,AT — SUBJECT E3 PROPERTY E4 s a ego goo f000 S00CE 9N FEE7 FLUCCS DESCRIPTION AREA (AC) 322 COASTAL SCRUB 3.91 411 PINE FLATWOODS 0.96 411E2 PINE FLATWOODS 15.77 411E3 PINE FLATWOODS 6.10 414 PINE & MESIC OAK 0.89 621 CYPRESS 4.63 621 E2 CYPRESS 8.05 621E3 CYPRESS 0.47 624E2 CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM 3.33 625 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 1.31 625E2 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 1.60 641 FRESHWATER MARSHES 0.84 TOTAL 47.86 NATIVE HABITAT ACRES : 47.86 EXOTICNOTE: ( ) El: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING <25% EXOTIC SPECIES. E2: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING 25-50 % EXOTIC SPECIES. E3: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING 50-75 % EXOTIC SPECIES. NATIVE VEGETATION E4: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING>75% EXOTIC SPECIES. 47.86 ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION. GMP NOTES: REQUIRES 25% PRESERVATION OF NATIVE THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND VEGETATION. FOR THIS SITE, A MINIMUM OF ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. 11.97 ACRES OF NATIVE VEGETATION MUST BE SURVEY COURTESY OF: "Q. GRADY MINOR" PRESERVED. SURVEY DATED: 8.19.13 M P E R I A I— L A K FEE `E3 NATIVE HABITAT MAP DESIGNED: TH 1Ew. BRAWN BY: RMJ — TREATED: 07-31-25 3. E JOB NO.: 1342 4. SHEET NO.: 04 OF 13 5. SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E A O O m N m l t In= `/rOSED �CPMENT f / f �I /f /f ff fj f f/ /f fj f fj f ff f / f /f f PROPOSED / I PRESERVE PROPOSED PRESERVE PROPOSED PRESERVE SUBJECT PROPERTY PROPOSED PRESERVE PROPERTY AREAS TYPE AREA SITE 76.81 S' 0 250 goo f000 SCAZZ 9N?EE7 DESIGNED: TH 1. Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. M P E R I A L LA K E S DRAWN BY RMJ 2 Marine & Environmental Consulting JOB NO.: 342 CREATED: 125 3. 342 4. 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104.3732 PROPOSED SITE SHEET NO.: 05 OF 13 5. Email:taaa@turrell-assoelates.uom Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax:(239) 643-6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E I SECONDARY WETLAND IMPACTS EXISTING LAKE I 'r r r r jr WETLAND r IMPACTS r r rr r rr EXISTING LAKE SUBJECT �� PROPERTY ♦♦♦Oi♦i♦i ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Marine & Environmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104.3732 Email: t ma@harell-assoeiates.eom Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643a , h -_ 1 I t . WETLAND IMPACT (AC) 9.29 © SECONDARY WETLAND IMPACT (AC) 2.07 NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "Q. GRADY MINOR" SURVEY DATED: 8-19-13 b, V- 3v� x >E 0 250 500 foe SCALE9NFEE7 SITE WETLANDS IMPACTS FLUCCS DESCRIPTION AREA (AC) 621 CYPRESS 1.98 621E2 CYPRESS 3.38 621E3 CYPRESS 0.03 624E2 CYPRESS -PINE -CABBAGE PALM 2.11 625 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 0.28 625E2 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 0.80 625E4 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 0.71 TOTAL 9.29 SITE SECONDARY WETLANDS IMPACTS FLUCCS DESCRIPTION AREA (Ac) 621 CYPRESS 0.35 621E2 CYPRESS 0.73 621E3 CYPRESS 0.02 624E2 CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM 0.39 625 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 0.08 625E2 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 0.12 625E4 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 0.38 TOTAL 2.07 EXOTICS NOTE: E1: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING <25 % EXOTIC SPECIES. E2: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING 25-50 % EXOTIC SPECIES. E3: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING 50-75 % EXOTIC SPECIES. E4: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING >75 % EXOTIC SPECIES. ED: TH 1- IMPERIAL LAKES DRAWN BY: I ^ CREATED: 07--31-25 13. - - - - JOB NO.: 1342 4. SITE IMPACTS MAP SHEET NO.: 06 OF 13 15. 1 1 1 1- I-E-1--ESECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E 11 PROPOSED PRESERVE \11 �� I PROPOSED PRESERVE r'r�r�i r rrrrrr r I rr i PRO 0 DEVEL01� r r rr rr rr rr rrrr rr✓ PROPOSEDI PRESERVE I L PROPOSED I PRESERVE 7) — SUBJECT PROPERTY 0 250 500 1000 SCALE9N'FEE7 ® UPLAND (ACRES): 1.70 WETLAND (ACRES): 13.75 TOTAL PRESERVE (ACRES): 15.45 (REQUIRED PRESERVE 11.97 AC.) NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND EXOTICS NOTE: ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. E1: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING <25% EXOTIC SPECIES. - - T E2: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING 25-50% EXOTIC SPECIES. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "0. GRADY MINOR" E3' INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING 50-75% EXOTIC SPECIES. SURVEY DATED: 8-19-13 E4: INDICATES AREAS CONTAINING >75% EXOTIC SPECIES. Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. DESIGNED: TH 2. M P E R I A L L A K E S DRAWN B. RMJ 2. Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 1342 25 3. JOB NO.: 1342 4. 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 341043132 PRESERVES MAP SHEET NO.: 07 OF 13 s. Email:tana@tulnll-associates.com Phone: (239)643.0166 Fax: (239)643.6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E FLUCCS DESCRIPTION AREA (AC) 411 PINE FLATWOODS 0.64 411E2 PINE FLATWOODS 0.38 411E3 PINE FLATWOODS 0.66 411E4 PINE FLATWOODS 0.02 621 CYPRESS 2.66 621E2 CYPRESS 4.66 621E3 CYPRESS 0.45 621E4 CYPRESS 0.51 624E2 CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM 1.22 625 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 1.03 625E2 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 0.80 625E4 HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS 1.59 641 FRESHWATER MARSHES 0.83 TOTAL 15.45 25 101 � 117 1 132 117 — 1 103 103 0 N 128 S 0 250 500 a000 J'C7{LE 7N �EE7 L31 UBJECT ROPERTY CODE DESCRIPTION HYDRIC ACRES CYPRESS LAKE-RIVIERA-COPELAND 25 FINE SANDS, FREQ. PONDED YES 5.35 99 WATER 14.01 101 BASINGER FINE SAND YES 29.69 CYPRESS LAKE-RIVIERA-COPELAND FINE 103 SANDS, FREQUENTLY PONDED-URBAN YES 25.30 LAND ASSOCIATION 117 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND 0.97 RIVIERA, LIMESTONE 132 SUBSTRATUM-COPELAND FINE YES 0.40 SAND -URBAN LAND ASSOCIATION 133 SATELLITE FINE SAND 1.09 TOTAL 76.81 DESIGNED: TH 1. Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. I M P E R I A L L A K E S DRAWN BY RMJ 2 ---_ Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 07-31-25 3. JOB NO.: 1342 4. 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104.3732 SOILS MAP SHEET NO.: 08 OF 13 s. E41: hma@tmrell-associws.Com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E AB GT PO ■ ■ LJ SE AA GT O LB �- AA® B WS PO SUBJECT PROPERTY EAGLE NEST 330' EAGLE NEST BUFFER v 4� rex4z- z S 0 25o goo 1000 SC?ICE 9N PEE7 SPECIES LEGEND SYMBOL ID DESCRIPTION QUANTITY GT GOPHER TORTOISE - POTENTIALLY OCCUPIED 16 AB GOPHER TORTOISE - ABANDONED 6 ® AA AMERICAN ALLIGATOR 2 LB LITTLE BLUE HERON 2 '* WS WOOD STORK 1 X WI WHITE IBIS 2 SE SNOWY EGRET 1 NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "Q. GRADY MINOR" SURVEY DATED: 8-19-13 x Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. DESIGNED: TH M P E R I A L LAKES DRAWN BY RMJ 2. Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 5 3. JOB NO.: 1342 1342 14. TV 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104.3732 LISTED SPECIES SHEET NO.: 109 OF 13 15. Email:tuna@Wmll-associafs.Com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E L- i'7KF 2� 20.0 3 12.411.8 ,11.4 10.0 o I . 11.8 1.8 .12.9 9.1 tt55 tt 14.3 16:5 I 12.6 36 14.6 SUBJECT 55 tt2.& 28 13.1 .2 PROPERTY 11 2 115.0 �3:4 16.6 11.4 15.3 14.4 16.5 16.3 10.8 10.2 1 Jpp .2 10.7 9.2 F 14.13.9 10.4 15.5 10.3 15.1 1511.9 12.9 9.6 I 14.9 14.7 15.1 92.9 gg 4 3 13.9 0.2 1i597 162�% 14.5 �5:0 14:� 14.91414 6 ! 1.2 16.0 122811.0 12.1 10.0 10.8 -v w N \` 0 2g0 goo 101 DESIGNED: TH 1, Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. M P E R I A L L A K E S DRAWN BY: RMJ 2. Marne 0 LnV�r�l)men1 Consulting CREATED: 07-31-25 3. OG E 1 C 1 JOB NO.: 1342 4. 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SHEET NO.: ,o OF 13 5. Email:lnna®tnll-assomates.e0m Phone:(239) W-0166 Fax: (239)643.6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E 50' O.C. TRANSECTS — SUBJECT PROPERTY w OVLI'. AS o 250 500 10l SCAZZ NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "Q. GRADY MINOR" SURVEY DATED: 8-19-13 DESIGNED: TH 1, Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. I M P S IR I A L L A K E S DRAWN BY: RMJ 2. Marine 0 LnV�r�en1 Consulting CREATED: 07-31-25 3. OG E 1 C 1 JOB NO.: 1342 4. P2��773584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 T RA N S E C T MAP SHEET NO.: 111 OF 13 5. _ _ Email:lnna®tnll-associates.com Phone:(239) 643.0166 Fax: (239)643.6632 SECTION-14&15 TOWNSHIP-48S RANGE-25E Ba y c luL FcwfY 51 0 1 2 �I • Mi • Bonita L r i3tinii ELk%.bRdSY4 1�JIj $ ° ..._ ApnitS{X't�achf�d� �111-r 0 0 )TMILE BUFFER may,^�=1•V`k,II= - .c-%iniFr'_.'uL. • o j 'O O • • ° • �`° ♦ bl• lb { a eimeRc' ,t4L'esl Golf • � o • 4 ° ':ountry Glub °O`•O • • 00 O 0 0 • • 0 •• Q • O a 17 0 • ° F 4 • 0"1 • aS - 0 • O rJ u31 C me3, 0c) Co uetiv C luti C 4. 00 • <'O 0 0 _i 5tooe ° 0 p • La kv 0 Co •&0 0•0 Legend •• s • • Q PROPERTY BOUNDARY 0 e • I' • • ° 3 MILE BUFFER Im rvok BBB Ru. " • • ° • Bear Report Date (Total: 268) • 0 2023 (QTY: 37) PROPERTY BOUNDARY ° - ° 2022 (QTY: 82) - 2021 (QTY: 32) 2020 (QTY: 35) I 0 2019 (QTY: 82) Twell, Hall &Associates, Inc DRAWN BY: RMJ REVISION: SCALE: I 1 -1.13 mi CREATED: 10-14-25 N/A FILE PATH: Marine & Environmental Consulting 3484ExchangeAve.SuiteB.Naples,FL34104-3732 IMPERIAL LAKES BEAR RELATED CALL MAP JOB NO.: 1342 N/A P:\1342-Imperial Lakes\GIS\ 1342-BEARS CALLS—d SHEET: 01 OF01 N/A Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone:(239)643-0166 Fax:(239)643-6632 SECTION-15 TOWNSHIP-48S RA GE-25E APPENDIX B: LISTED SPECIES SURVEY THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SUMMARY IMPERIAL LAKES UPDATED JUNE 2025 Prepared by: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLEs, FL 34104 1.0 INTRODUCTION & SITE DESCRIPTION The Imperial Lakes project site is approximately 76.81 acres located in northern Collier County, east of Old U.S. 41 and west of Livingston Road, just south of the Lee/Collier County line. The project property is located within Sections 14 and 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The project is identified as folio number 00153160004 by the Collier County property appraiser's office. Access to the project is via a road access easement from Livingston Road to the northern property line. A general location map is provided in the included exhibits. The proposed project is located on undeveloped land, with multifamily developments and golf courses in the vicinity on all sides. The properties directly adjacent to the parcel are mostly undeveloped, with the exception of the property to the south and to the east near the southern end of the subject parcel. The property boundary encompasses approximately 76.82 acres and consists primarily of undeveloped, forested land and two lakes. The lakes were excavated for fill between 1984 and 1985. A majority of the site has been infested to varying degrees by exotic vegetation including melaleuca and Brazilian pepper. The property contains about 39.85 acres of upland habitats (52% of the project area) and 22.33 acres of wetland habitats (29% of the project area) as well as 14.64 acres of other surface waters (OSW) (19% of the project area). A Threatened and Endangered Species Survey was performed to consider potential effects of the proposed project on any state or federally listed species that may utilize the property for feeding/foraging and/or nesting. All observations to date are described in the following report. 2.0 LISTED SPECIES SURVEYS Wildlife and listed species surveys were conducted by Turrell, Hall & Associates (THA) biologists on the project lands. As used herein, the term "listed animal species" refers to those animals listed as endangered or threatened by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) or the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) as well as those animal species listed as species of special concern by the FWC. The term "listed plant species" refers to those plants listed as endangered or threatened by the FWS. Several animal species listed by FWC are also classified (listed) by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) as wetland dependent species. THA's wildlife/listed species surveys were supplemented by research concerning listed species. The following subsections document these efforts and the results of these efforts. 2.1 DATABASE RESEARCH Prior to field investigations, aerial photos, soils maps, and prior mapping for the Imperial Lakes property were reviewed to identify the various vegetation associations potentially present on and adjacent to project lands. Various publications and databases were reviewed to determine listed plant and wildlife species which could occur and those that had been previously documented on or near the project lands as well as to gather information concerning listed species (see listed references in Section 4). Based on the habitat types identified, existing knowledge of the project area, contact with agency biologists, and review of publications and databases, a preliminary list of listed plant and animal species with the potential to occur within or near the project lands was determined. 2.2 FIELD BIOTIC SURVEY METHODOLOGY Preliminary biotic and listed species surveys for the proposed project have been conducted by THA personnel in 2016, 2018, 2021, and 2025. Table 2 provides the specific dates and times of these surveys, the total number of man-hours spent surveying on a given date, and the ecologists who conducted the surveys on a given date. In excess of 60 staff hours (man-hours) have thus far been spent conducting the surveys. Surveys were conducted such that observations included time periods ranging from sunrise to sunset and across multiple years. Barring seasonal considerations, the survey dates allowed for observations during likely times of probable occurrence for the majority of the listed animal species which could occur on or immediately adjacent to the project lands. The field surveys consisted of ecologists walking relatively straight and meandering transects through the various habitats found on the project lands. Space between transects usually varied, depending on type of habitat, visibility limits, and density of vegetation. Observers were equipped with aerials, wildlife and plant identification books and notes, binoculars, field notebooks, and hand- held GPS units. Along the transects, the biologists periodically stopped, looked for wildlife and signs of wildlife, looked for listed plant species in appropriate habitats, and listened for wildlife vocalizations. The approximate location of observed listed wildlife and plant species and their numbers were mapped on aerials and recorded in field notebooks on a daily basis as were signs of listed wildlife species that were noted. In the same fashion, observed non -listed wildlife species encountered or signs of such species were recorded daily. When performing the pedestrian transects through appropriate habitats, particular consideration was given to looking for signs of gopher tortoise burrows and potential bonneted bat roosting locations. These efforts included examining all pine trees greater than 6"dbh for evidence of cavities. All dead snags were also examined for cavities that could support bonneted bat roosting. The field survey methodologies utilized on the project lands were generally consistent with those prescribed by the FWC (GFC, 1988). The following provides a discussion of how the methodologies employed deviated from the specific subcategories of wildlife survey methods recommended in the referenced FWC (formerly GFC) document. "Small Mammal Sampling" No small mammal trapping was performed. None of the species listed under this methodology could be reasonably expected to occur on the project lands due to inappropriate habitat and/or the range of the species not extending into the project area. "Gopher Tortoise Burrow Surveys" Methods used were consistent except for: (1) survey transects occupied a higher density of transects than is recommended plus covered a higher percentage of potentially suitable habitats than is recommended; (2) survey transects included habitat types not normally considered appropriate for gopher tortoises. The surveys were performed by the following THA personnel: Tim Hall Education: B.S. in Forest Resources and Conservation, M.S. in Wildlife Ecology. Experience: 26 years as an environmental consultant with emphasis on listed species surveys and management plans, environmental impact analyses and assessments, wetland delineation, environmental permitting, and various other environmental topics. Christina Hall Education: B.A. in Environmental Studies. Experience: 5 years of professional environmental consulting and ecological studies experience in Florida including performing wetland delineations, listed species/wildlife surveys, habitat mapping, tortoise relocations, and environmental permitting. Sara Packard Education: B.A. in Environmental Studies. Experience: 1 year of professional environmental consulting and ecological studies experience in Florida including performing wetland delineations, habitat mapping, and environmental permitting. 2.3 RESULTS 2.3.1 Research Results The review conducted of the various existing databases concerning documented listed species (FWC, FWS, FNAI) did not reveal records of any listed plant species documented on the project lands. Conversations with FWC personnel indicated that black bears were suspected of crossing the property for transient passage, though this use has decreased with all of the development that has occurred in the area. THA's review of these existing databases included searching records for documented listed species occurring within approximately 5,000 feet of the subject property boundary. Other listed animal species previously documented outside the project lands but within 5,000 feet of the Imperial Lakes property included little blue heron, tricolored heron, and bald eagle. There were no records of any listed plant species occurring in the query area. 2.3.2 Listed Animal Species Observed Several different animal species, including six protected species, were observed during the course of THA's wildlife/listed species surveys. Table 3 provides a listing of all the wildlife (animal) species observed on the Imperial Lakes property during the course of THA's surveys. Surveys specific to the bonneted bat resulted in no observations of roosting activities. Surveys specific to gopher tortoises resulted in location of 22 tortoise burrows from an estimated population of 12 to 14 tortoises. The following subsections briefly address the listed animal species observed on -site (i.e. within the Imperial Lakes property boundary). Snowy Egret Snowy egrets (Egretta thula) were observed several occasions foraging along the pond shorelines. No snowy egret nests or signs of nesting were observed on -site or in the adjacent areas. White This Several white ibis (Eudocimus albus) were observed on different occasions foraging within the open trails and adjacent wooded areas between the two ponds. White ibis were also observed perching in cypress trees within the southern cypress dome. No white ibis nests or signs of nesting were observed on -site or in adjacent areas. Little Blue Heron Little blue herons (Egretta caerulea) were also documented foraging along the shorelines of the two ponds. No heron nests or signs of nesting were observed on -site or in adjacent areas. Wood Stork Two wood storks (Mycteria americana) was observed within the marsh area at the center of the southern cypress dome. No wood stork nests or signs of nesting were observed on -site or in adjacent areas. Bald Eagle A bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) nest has been documented along the southeastern property line of the site. This nest (CO071) was active during the 2024/25 nesting season and is apparently acclimated to some disturbance as the adjacent high school was constructed while this nest has been in use. Gopher Tortoise Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrows were observed predominately in the scrub habitat at the northwest corner of the site. Approximately 22 burrows were located and flagged. 2.3.3 Listed Animal Species Which Have the Potential to Occur but Were Not Observed Although not observed on the project lands during the listed species surveys, additional state and/or federally listed faunal species could potentially occur on the Imperial Lakes property or on lands adjacent to the property. Based on habitats present within these areas, land uses, species observed near the project during biotic surveys, habitats present in the general area, review of various sources of information previously, and personal experience of project ecologists, assessments were made as to the probability of occurrence of other listed species on the project lands. Three species of mammals, 1 species of reptile, 1 amphibian species, and 1 species of birds were considered to have some potential for occurring on the Imperial Lakes property. These species are listed in Table 4. This table provides the state and federal designation status of each species along with a generalized rating as to the probability for each species to occur on project lands. By "occur", it is meant that the species could either utilize project lands for hunting/foraging purposes, traverse/pass through project lands, directly reside on the project lands (unlikely), or use the lands for nests, burrows, or dens as applicable to the species. The following sub -sections address the identified species. Big Cypress Fox Squirrel The Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) (BCFS) is considered a threatened species by the FWC and is classified as a wetland dependent species by SFWMD. BCFS typically reside in pine flatwoods and mixed pine and cypress forests and prefer mature forests that are open and "park -like" (e.g., have a scattered subcanopy and a ground cover not dominated by woody species or vines). BCFS can also be found in melaleuca infested forests provided some desirable habitat remains in the general area and can also forage areas containing hardwoods such as oaks and cabbage palms. The areas of pine flatwoods present on -site are thoroughly infested with exotic vegetation, predominately melaleuca. As a result, the site does not have the open mid -story that is normally favored by BCFS. The golf course immediately to the south of the project site has documented fox squirrels on the course so it is likely that BCFS could theoretically occupy some habitats around the southern project lands, and there is a very limited possibility that BCFS may occasionally forage in semi -appropriate habitats present elsewhere on the property. During the course of the listed species/wildlife surveys, no BUS individuals were observed. Day beds and chewed cones were observed on -site but were attributed to grey squirrels which were observed. Given this and the absence of suitable habitats, the potential for BUS residing on the project lands is judged to be moderate. Florida Black Bear The Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) was recently delisted from threatened status by the FWC and is classified as a wetland dependent species by SFWMD. Black bears are known to travel great distances to forage and mate. The range of habitat types used and traversed by the Florida black bear is very broad and could theoretically encompass the project lands. Personal conversations with FWC staff revealed several records within 5 miles of the project lands. During the course of THA's biotic surveys, staff did not find any Florida black bears or positive signs of this species' presence. However, black bear presence has been noted on the adjacent Conservation Collier lands to the west of this site. It is unlikely that any black bears would den on the project lands due to the relatively small size and proximity to adjacent development. Suitability of the majority of the project lands for bear foraging is low due to the melaleuca and other exotic vegetation infestation, thus it is anticipated that chances of bears using the project lands to any significant degree are limited. There is a high chance that black bears may occasionally roam through portions of the project lands considering the number of reported sightings within 5 miles of the project. Florida Bonneted Bat The Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) was listed as endangered by FWS in December 2013. There is very little information regarding the life history or distribution of the Florida bonneted bat. The majority of roosts are found in non-native habitat or artificial roosts such as bat houses. Typically, the colonies are small consisting of one male and several females. Roosting can occur in tree cavities or in artificial structures such as bat houses or buildings. Foraging typically occurs in native habitats including hardwoods, pinelands and mangrove habitats, but golf courses and neighborhoods may also be utilized. A thorough survey of the project lands was conducted to search for tree cavities or other structure that could be utilized by bonneted bats. A total of 5 cavities were located in 4 dead snags in the northern portions of the project site. These cavities were peeped with a small camera and monitor system and were determined to be unoccupied. No evidence of any bat utilization was observed on the project site. Gopher Frog Gopher frogs (Rana capito), listed as a Species of Special Concern (SSC) by the FWC, are potential commensals with gopher tortoises. Several gopher tortoises were found on the Imperial Lakes property and adjacent lands so it is possible that gopher frogs could also be present. Special care will be taken when relocating tortoises to insure that gopher frogs or other commensals are not harmed during the relocation efforts. Although gopher frogs are highly dependent upon gopher tortoise burrows for shelter, they occasionally also find refuge in other burrows (crayfish, rodent) and features such as stump holes. Such features are also present on the Imperial Lakes property, however the on - site wetlands are not highly suitable gopher frog habitats and appropriate nearby wetlands are a necessary component of the frog's life cycle. Eastern Indigo Snake The eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) is listed as threatened by FWS and FWC. Generally this species lives and hunts in a wide variety of habitats and its territory can cover large areas. They can be associated with gopher tortoise burrows (as a commensal) and favor pine flatwoods, palmetto prairies, and scrub habitats as well as wetland edges. They are relatively reclusive in nature and observations in the wild are rather rare. There would seem to be a moderate probability that one or more eastern indigo snakes may occasionally utilize any number of different habitats present in the project lands. It seems unlikely that such snakes actually reside on the Imperial Lakes property given the restricted access due to past disturbances and surrounding development. Indigo snakes could theoretically reside on the property, however chances seem remote. Southeastern American Kestrel American kestrels are represented in south Florida by two subspecies. The year-round resident, the Southeastern American kestrel (Falco sparverius paulus), is listed by FWC as threatened, while the second subspecies, the Eastern American kestrel (F. sparverius sparverius) migrates to Florida in the winter months and is not listed by the FWC. Kestrels typically forage for insects and lizards in pastures, open fields, and park -like landscapes with a relatively open midstory and canopy and short herbaceous groundcover (Stys, 1993). They typically nest in dead trees in cavities created by other avian species. The nest trees are usually in close proximity to suitable foraging areas. Listed kestrels may infrequently spend time hunting the open fairways of the golf courses to the south of the project site, though there is no appropriate foraging habitat on the site itself. Although listed kestrels may forage in such areas on occasion, it is unlikely that any reside on the property. No listed kestrels were seen on or adjacent to the property nor were signs of possible kestrel nests observed. 2.3.4 General Wildlife Observations During the biotic surveys conducted on the project lands, ecologists recorded sightings and signs of non -listed wildlife in addition to listed species. Table 3 contains all wildlife observed on the project lands. Signs of larger mammals, such as white-tailed deer, were observed in portions of the Imperial Lakes property. Other mammals actually observed on the Imperial Lakes property were armadillo, raccoon, and gray squirrels. Observations of non -listed bird species were generally widely scattered and low in number and were particularly infrequent in the interior of the site. Although several species of non -listed birds are indicated in Table 3, the actual number of individuals and number of species observed during any given period of wildlife observations was typically low. A few of the non -migratory bird species may reside on the project lands, however very few nests were observed. Observations of non -listed herps were largely restricted to the Imperial Lakes property's ponds. 2.3.5 Listed Plant Species According to the FWS, no federally listed plant species have been documented in Collier County (USFWS, 2015). No listed plant species were observed on the project lands during the course of the listed species/wildlife surveys conducted and a review of pertinent databases concerning listed plant species found no records of such plants occurring on project lands or within 5,000 feet of these lands. Considering these points, it seems highly improbable that any plant species currently listed by FWS may be present on project lands. Several butterfly orchids (Encyclia tampensis) were observed on cypress trees within the on -site cypress domes. All of the observed specimens are within the proposed preserve areas and will not be impacted by the proposed development. Any orchid specimens found within the development footprint will be relocated to within the preserve boundaries. REFERENCES Chafin, L.G. 2000. Field guide to the rare plants of Florida. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee, Florida. Deyrup, Mark and R. Franz (ed.). 1994. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume IV, invertebrates. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 1999. Florida land use, cover, and forms classification system. FDOT, Tallahassee, FL. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). 2013. Florida's endangered species, threatened species, and species of special concern - official lists. FWC, Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). 2014. Florida panther telemetry data, 2/23/1981 through 7/24/2014 — GIS database. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. FWC. 2015. Florida panther mortality data, 2/13/1972 through 12/31/2015 — GIS database. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. FWC. 2015. Florida black bear nuisance report data, 1980 through 2014 — GIS database. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). 2015. Florida's waterbird colony locator. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. Available online: http://atoll.floridamarine.org/WaterBirds/ (Accessed June, 2015) FWC. 2015. FWC eagle nest locator; data for 2000 through 20014. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. Available online: http://myfwc.com/eagle/eaglenests. (Accessed June, 2015) Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (GFC). 1988. Wildlife methodology guidelines for section 18.1) of the Application for Development Approval. GFC, Tallahassee, FL. Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI). 2014. Species and natural communities tracking list for Collier County, Florida. FNAI, Tallahassee, FL. Available online: http://www.fnai.org/trackinglist.cfm (accessed June, 2015) Gilbert, C.R. 1992. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume II, fishes. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Hipes, D., D.R. Jackson, K. NeSmith, D. Printiss, and K. Brandt. 2000. Field guide to the rare animals of Florida. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee, Florida. Humphrey, Stephen R. (ed.). 1992. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume I, Mammals. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Kautz, R., R. Kawula, T. Hoctor, J. Comiskey, D. Jansen, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti, R. McBride, L. Johnson, and K. Root. 2006. How much is enough? Landscape -scale conservation for the Florida panther. Biological Conservation 130, 118-133. Moler, Paul E. (ed.). 1992. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume IIl, amphibians and reptiles. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Multi-Species/Ecosystem Recovery Implementation Team (MERIT) for South Florida, Florida Panther Subteam. 2002. Landscape conservation strategy for the Florida panther in south Florida. USFWS, Vero Beach, FL. Rodgers, J.A, H.W. Kale, and H.T. Smith (ed.). 1996. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume V, birds. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Runde, D.E., J.A. Gore, J.A. Hovis, M.S. Robson, and P.D. Southall. 1991. The Florida atlas of breeding sites for herons and their allies. Nongame wildlife program technical report No. 10. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL. South Florida Water Management District. June, 2005. Basis of review for environmental resource permit applications within the South Florida Water Management District - Table 4.2.7-1: Listed wildlife species that are aquatic or wetland dependent and that use upland habitats for nesting or denning. SFWMD, West Palm Beach, Florida. Stys, Beth. 1993. Ecology and habitat protection needs of the Southeastern American kestrel on large- scale development sites in Florida. Nongame Wildlife Technical Report #13. FWC, Tallahassee, FL. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. South Florida multi -species recovery plan. USFWS, Vero Beach, FL. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Red -cockaded Woodpecker South Florida Survey Protocol. USFWS, Vero Beach, FL. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015. Federally listed and candidate species in Collier County, Florida, Vero Beach, FL. Available online: http://www.fws.gov/verobeach/ (Accessed June, 2015). Ward, Daniel B. (ed.). 1991. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Volume V, plants. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Appendix 1: Tables APPENDIX 1 TABLES Table 1. Existing FLUCFCS categories present on the Imperial Lakes property. FLUCFCS FLUCFCS Description Acres % of Total Code Property 322 Coastal Scrub 3.91 5.1 411 Pine Flatwoods 0.96 1.2 411E2 Pine Flatwoods (25% - 50% exotics) 15.77 20.5 411E3 Pine Flatwoods (50% - 75% exotics) 6.10 7.9 411E4 Pine Flatwoods (75% - 100% exotics) 11.50 14.9 414 Pine Mesic Oak Flatwoods 0.89 1.1 520 Lakes 14.64 19.1 621 Cypress 4.63 6.0 621E2 Cypress (25% - 50% exotics) 8.05 10.5 621E3 Cypress (50% - 75% exotics) 0.47 0.1 621E4 Cypress (75% - 100% exotics) 0.51 0.1 624E2 Cypress / Pine / Palm (50% - 75% exotics) 3.33 4.3 625 Hydric Pine Flatwood 1.31 1.7 625E2 Hydric Pine Flatwood(25% - 50% exotics) 1.60 2.1 625E4 Hydric Pine Flatwood (75% - 100% exotics) 2.30 3.0 641 Freshwater Marsh 0.84 1.1 TOTAL ACRES 76.81 Appendix 1: Tables Table 3. Wildlife species observed on or immediately adjacent to the Imperial Lakes property. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS FWC FWS SFWMD REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS American alligator Alligator mississippiensis WDS Green anole Anolis carolinensis -- -- -- Brown anole Anolis sagrei -- -- -- Southern black racer Coluber constrictor priapus -- -- -- Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus T -- -- Red rat snake Pantherophis guttatus -- -- -- BIRDS Great blue heron Ardea herodias -- -- -- Cattle egret Bubulcus ibis -- -- -- Red-shouldered hawk Buteo lineatus -- -- -- Northern cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis -- -- -- Turkey vulture Cathartes aura -- -- -- Belted kingfisher Ceryle alcyon Common killdeer Charadrius vociferus -- -- -- Ground dove Columbina passerina -- -- -- Black vulture Coragyps atratus -- -- -- Yellow-romped warbler Dendroica coronata -- -- -- Pileated woodpecker Dryocopus pileatus -- -- -- Gray catbird Dumetella carolinensis Swallow-tailed kite Elanoides forficatus -- -- -- White ibis Eudocimus albus SSC -- WDS Little blue heron E retta caerulea SSC -- WDS Snowy egret E retta thula SSC -- WDS Bald Ea le Haliaeetus leucoce halus -- -- WDS Loggerhead shrike Lanius ludovicianus -- -- -- Red-bellied woodpecker Melaner es carolinus -- -- -- Northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos -- -- -- Boat-tailed grackle Quiscalus major -- -- -- Carolina wren Thryothorus ludovicianus -- -- -- Mourning dove Zenaida macroura -- -- -- MAMMALS Feral dog (Coyote?)* Canis spp. -- -- -- Nine-banded armadillo* Dasypus novemcinctus -- -- -- White-tailed deer* Odocoileus virginianus -- -- -- Raccoon Procyon lotor -- -- -- Gray squirrel Sciurus carolinensis -- -- -- FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service SFWMD = South Florida Water Management District E = Endangered SSC = Species of Special Concern T = Threatened T (S/A) = Threatened (due to similarity of appearance to crocodile) WDS = Wetland dependent species -- = Not Listed * = Indicates species not directly observed but signs of the species (i.e. scat, tracks, etc.) were documented. Note: This table is based on species the results of listed species/wildlife surveys conducted by THA, Inc. Table 4. Animal species listed by FWS and FWC that were not observed on -site but could utilize or reside on the Imperial Lakes property, along with their relative probability of occurrence. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE FWS FWC REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS Eastern indigo snake Drymarchon corais couperi T T Moderate Gopher frog Rana capito -- SSC Very Low BIRDS Southeastern American kestrel Falco sparverius paulus -- T Moderate / Low MAMMALS Florida bonneted bat Eumops floridanus E E Very Low Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia -- T Moderate Florida black bear Ursus americanus floridanus -- -- Moderate FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service E = Endangered SSC = Species of Special Concern T = Threatened -- = Not Listed PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE = Relative probability of indicated species inhabiting or utilizing the sites as based on the following scale: Very High, High, Moderate, Low, Very Low. A rating of "none" indicates it is highly unlikely that the species may inhabit or utilize the area (no probability). APPENDIX C: INITIAL COORDINATION WITH DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES This record search is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute a project review. This search only identifies resources recorded at the Florida Master Site File and does NOT provide project approval from the Division of Historical Resources. Contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333 for project review information. March 2, 2016 Arielle Poulos Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 3584 Exchange Avenue Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 643-0166 Email: Ariellek,Turrell-Associates.com In response to your inquiry of March 2, 2016 the Florida Master Site File lists two archeological sites and no other cultural resources found at the designated parcel in Collier County, Florida Township 48S Range 25E Sections 14 & 15 as submitted with the search request When interpreting the results of our search, please consider the following information: • This search area may contain unrecorded archaeological sites, historical structures or other resources even if previously surveyed for cultural resources. • Because vandalism and looting are common at Florida sites, we ask that you limit the distribution of location information on archaeological sites. • While many of our records document historically significant resources, the documentation of a resource at the Florida Master Site File does not necessarily mean the resource is historically significant. • Federal, state and local laws require formal environmental review for most projects. This search DOES NOT constitute such a review. If your project falls under these laws, you should contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding the results of this search. Sincerely, Eman M. Vovsi Historical Data Analyst, FMSF EMVovsi@DOS.MyFlorida.com 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 • www.flheritage.com/preservation/sitefile 850.245.6440 ph 1 850.245.6439 fax I SiteFile@dos. state.fl.us 1 13 4k— All II l Il 4- -, ANINA-7 2 11 11 II II 0111<4 LLJL.11. IJ I I LAU �j II rj' ]IF Trade r 5- fir III Qk- CROO559 II CF4&,60 . .. . .... . . . . * . w - 0 • 0 ......... . .1, . ........... o db Gof C C� 10 30-1 rce: Esn 3qiQitA'G.Idbe e apping.- �erd, r I.G�I , 1-9 urse , J� a --- — ------ . ■ij�■ Golf Cou Se Nq:n. )-,Z-.aOstar eographmds, CNE&AAirbus DS­ USDA, US b At wis ,,Stapd, and the GIS User Co'[n::t' nity Florida Master Site File 'TFiTlorida AR=2 Master ss=e CM=O Site AMb RG=O File otal=2 Tota SitelD Type Site Name CR00242 AR SAND KNOLL CR00737 AR LIVINGSTON ROAD NONE <4 MILES Cultural Resource Roster Address Additional Info SHPO Eval Not Eligible Created: 3/2/2016 NR Status Page 1 of 1 E-A V C lu L } N TFY� � 0 1 2 I�I • Mi • Bonita oaaliag�.YcnRdSW ° prings c. Apnitaa,t� h"S �1-r o ° ° 3 MILE BUFFER N N �i ;asin'j _..uL. • O %• u� • O O• .. __•�'w—_I ._—Q �, .�.. --=�—ice._,_-O• -- • -—— — - — — — — —— • —• MedmeRa • ::ounvy lub • •� 4 o 00 • �0 • O° • O ` V °• • • 8 i �° o o •� o °°g,. ,a o • riu=Nlceea3, ;i ,. O®46 ou CI • Co uti Cl _. i! r'4.. n L ° •1% • Legend • • _ • 00 e • • 00 Q PROPERTY BOUNDARY • ' 1. 3 MILE BUFFER , ui .•iP it -- _ ._.. im rvok Ifte Mu. • • O • '�; Bear Report Date (Total: 268) • 2023 (QTY: 37) PROPERTY BOUNDARY O - c _ ti 17° 2022 (QTY: 82) v'. t - 2021 (QTY: 32) 2020 (QTY: 35) I ' • 2019 (QTY: 82) lwrell, Hall &Associates, Inc DRAWN BY: RMJ REVISION: SCALE: 1 1-1.13— CREATED: 10-14-25 N/A FILE PATH: Marine & Environmental Consulting 3484ExchangeAve.SuiteB.Naples,FL34104-3732 IMPERIAL LAKES BEAR RELATED CALL MAP JOB NO.: 1342 N/A R\,342-m,p�n.l Lak.\GIS\ 1342-BEARS CAias.—d SHEET: 01 OF01 N/A Email: llma@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION- 15 TOWNSHIP-48 S RANGE-25 E J MB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT Imperial Lakes RPUD Amendment (Veterans Memorial Boulevard, Collier County, Florida) October 12, 2025 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = ,$500.00 TIS (Major Study) Review Fee = $1,500.00 Prepared by: v MB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 471 1 7Tw AvENuE SW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 1 9 (239) 227-2355 CERTIFICATE of AUTHORIZATION NO. 278313 (PROJECT No. 1 701 1 1) TABLE OF CONTENTS Summation and Conclusions 2 Methodology S Scope of Project 6 Table A - Proposed Development Scenarios 6 Figure i - Project Location & Roadway Classification 6.1 Master Concept Plan 6.2 Project Generated Traffic 7 Table B - Net New Trips Generated 7 Table 1A - Trip Generation Computations 7.1 Table 113 - Trip Generation Computations 7.2 Existing + Committed Road Network 8 Project Generated Traffic Distribution 8 Area of Significant Impact 8 Figure 2 - Project Traffic Distribution 8.1 Table 2 - Area of Impact/Road Classification 8.2 2024 thru 2029 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions 9 Table 3 - 2024 & 2029 Link Volumes 9.1 Table 4 - 2029 Link Volumes/Capacity Analysis 9.2 1 Summation and Conclusions Imperial Lakes RPUD is an existing PUD that was approved and vested for the development of 430 multi -family dwelling units and having a vested trip cap of 205 new PM peak hour two-way trips. The vested 430 multi -family dwelling units are equivalent to 216 single-family dwelling units that would also have a trip cap of 205 PM trips. It is proposed to amend the Imperial Lakes RPUD which would allow for two (2) potential development scenarios for the subject property as described below. A. Development Pursuant to Growth Management Plan (GMT) - The property could be developed with 313 single-family and/or multi -family dwelling units and would have a trip cap of 290 new PM peak hour two-way trips- B. Vested Development Rights - 430 multi -family dwelling units having a vested trip cap of 205 new PM peak hour two-way trips. The vested 430 multi -family units are equivalent to 216 single-family dwelling units that would also have a trip cap of 205 PM trips. Based upon the findings of this report, it was determined that the two development alternatives for Imperial Lakes RPUD will not significantly or negatively impact the surrounding road network or cause any roadways to operate below their adopted level of service standard. It is noted that per Collier County's 2024 AUIR, the current traffic demand on the segment of U.S. 41 (between Immokalee Road and Wiggins Pass Road) and Old 41 (north of U.S. 41) exceeds the adopted level of service capacity. These roadway links are not within the project's area of impact and are not significantly or negatively impacted by the project's net new trips_ The project's vested trips (i.e., 205 two-way PM peak hour trips) are, by vested rights, included in the 2024 background traffic and the net new trips will not significantly or negatively impact these roadways. Those specific roadway links currently operate at a level of service that exceed their respective adopted LOS standards, regardless of the development of Imperial Lakes PUD. All other roadways, within the project's area of influence, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the net new traffic generated by the maximum development intensity of 313 single-family units or as vested up to 430 multifamily units having a vested trip cap of 205 new PM peak hour two-way trips. The vested 430 multi- family dwelling units are equivalent to 216 single-family dwelling units that would also have a trip cap of 205 PM trips. Although the project does not adversely impact any roads or cause any roads to operate below the adopted LOS standard, the Developer will be required to pay for its portion of "consumed" capacity via payment of road impact fees. As set forth by Collier County's Impact Fee Ordinance, the fees are a pro rata assessment towards the funding of area - wide transportation improvements to support new growth. The amount of road impact fees paid per type of land use are determined via a "consumption -based impact fee approach", in which new development is charged based upon the proportion ofvehicle- 2 miles of travel (VMT) that each unit of new development is expected to consume of a lane mile of roadway network. The cost of consumed lane mule is based upon current roadway construction costs within Collier County. Therefore, the payment of road impact fees is the projects pro rata share of funding transportation improvements that are deemed necessary to support the demands generated by new growth. Northwest Traffic Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) The proposed residential project is located within the Northwest Traffic Concurrency Management Area (NW-TCMA) and is subject to Collier County's Growth Management Plan. The following summarizes the GMP conditions and the project's compliance status. Policy 5.6 In order to be exempt from link -specific concurrency, developments within the TCMA must provide documentation to the Transportation Planning Section that at least two (2) Transportation Demand Management (TD* strategies utilized meet the criteria of the LDC. Monitoring of the use and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the required annual monitoring report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report shall, for three (3) years following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the use and effectiveness of the selected strategies in a, forma provided by the County. Modifications to the applied TDM strategies may be made within the first three (3) years of'development if they are deemed ineffective. Modifications to the new TDMstrategies may be made within this second three-year period and subsequent three-year periods if the TDM strategies are deemed ineffective. Another assessment shall be completed within three (3) years and in three- year increments until the TDMstrategies are deemed effective. Project Status -- Satisfied The net new nonvested trips associated with the most -intense development scenario (i.e., 313 single-family units) as proposed by the PUD amendment will not directly access a road or significantly impact a road that currently operates below its adopted level of service. Therefore, the project is not requested to be exempt from link -specific concurrency. Policy 5.7 Each TCMA shall maintain 85% of its lane miles at or above the LOS standards described in Policies .1.5.A and I.5.B of the Capital Improvement Element. If any Tragic Impact Statement (TIS)for a proposed development indicates that fewer than 85% of the large miler in a TCMA are achieving the LOS standards indicated alcove, the proposed development shall not be permitted where such condition occurs awnless modification of the development is made sufficient to maintain the LOSS' standard for the TCMA, or the facilities required to maintain the TCMA LDS standard are committed utilizing the standards for committed improvements in Policy 5.3 of the Capital Improvement Element of the Plan. 3 Project Status - Satisfied The Northwest TCMA has 85% of its north/south and east/west lane miles operating at or above the LOS standards described in Policies 1.5.A. and 1.5.B. of the GMP, and therefore, no further action is required to address this policy. Policy 5.8. Should the TIS far a proposed development reflect that it will impact either a constrained roadway lank andlor a deficient roadway link within a TCMA as determined in the most current Annual Update and Inventory Report (A UIR), by more than a de minimis amount (more than I % of the maximum service volume at the adopted LOS), yet continue to maintain the established percentage of lanes miles indicated in Policy 5.7 of this Element, a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment shall be required as follows: (YI)(IX)a. Congestion mitigation payments shall be calculated using the formula established in Section 163.3180(5)(h), Florida Statutes. The facility cast for a constrained roadway link shall be established using a typical lane mile cost, as determined by the Collier County Transportation Administrator, of adding Ianes to a similar arealfacility type as the constrained facility. (VI)b. Congestion mitigation payments shall be utilized by Collier County to add trip capacity within the impacted TCMA, road segments) andlor to enhance mass transit or other non -automotive transportation alternatives, which adds trip capacity within the impact fee district or adjoining impact fee district_ (VI)c. Congestion mitigation payments under this Policy shall be determined subsequent to a finding of concurrency for a proposed project within a TCMA and shall not influence the concurrency determination process. (W)(IA)d. No impact will be de minimis if it exceeds the adopted LOS standard of any affected designated hurricane evacuation routes within a TCMA. Hurricane routes in Collier County are shown on Map TR-7. Any impact to a hurricane evacuation route within a TCMA shall require a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment provided the remaining LOS requirements of the TCMA are maintained. Project Status — Satisfied The net new nonvested trips associated with the most -intense development scenario (i.e., 313 single-family units) as proposed by the PUD amendment will not directly access a road or significantly impact a road that currently operates below its adopted level of service. Furthermore, any road that currently or will operate below its adopted level of service, it was determined that the project has a de minimis impact on that road, except for Old 41 which the project's impact is less than 2.%. 4 Methodology On June 20, 2025, a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Methodology Report was submitted to the office of Collier County Transportation Planning Department. The $500.00 methodology meeting fee will be paid at the time of submitting the zoning application. Revisions to the TIS subse uent to Methodology Approval I. The TIS reflects the funded extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard from its western terminus to U.S. 41, per Collier County's 5-year CIP. 2. The distribution of trips were revised based upon the extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard. 3. The maximum development intensity will be limited to 313 single-family units. 4. Based upon the new and reduced maximum development intensity having a .net new trips of 85 vph during the PM peak hour, the project is now considered a "minor" TIS vs. a major study. 5 Scope of Project It is proposed to amend the Imperial Lakes RPUD which would allow for two (2) potential development scenarios for the subject property as described below. 5. Development Pursuant to Growth Management Plan (GMP) - The property could be developed with 313 single-family and/or multi -family dwelling units and would have a trip cap of 290 new PM peak hour two-way trips. 6. Vested Development Rights - 430 multi -family dwelling units having a vested trip cap of 205 new PM peak hour two-way trips. The vested 430 multi -family units are equivalent to 216 single-family dwelling units that would also have a trip cap of 205 PM trips. The site is located on the south side of the future Veterans Memorial Boulevard West extension and approximately 1.3 miles west of Livingston Road, within Collier County, Florida. Access to the site will be created by the funded extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard (VMB) from its west terminus to the project site and to intersect U.S. 41 as funded per Collier County's 5-year CIP. Table A Proposed Development Scenarios Development Scenario Proposed Land Use Maximum Number of Dwelling Units Trips Cap Per Dev. Scenario Development Scenario A Single -Family 290 Trips (Development Per GMP) and/or 313 d.u.'s 183 enterll07 exit Multi -Family (Refer to Table I R) Development Scenario B1 205 Trips {Vested Development) Multi -Family 430 d.u.'s 129 enter176 exit (Refer to Table 1 C) Note 1 Vested Development Rights - 430 multi -family dwelling units having a vested trip cap of 205 new PM peak hour two-way trips. The vested 430 multi -family units are equivalent to 216 single-family dwelling units that would also have a trip cap of 205 PM trips. 0 Pennsylvan'so Ave --Bonito Seach Rd — ! I Dean 5t ' a`ao a I I w � c w a a x 0 ' #I U 7 e 9 m _ EI 0 0 I a+ C IP C J 1 --- -----1-------- Veterans Mem. Blvd 1 Learning Lone Raving Way IEntrodo Ave 1-F I � I I � � m x c y � I � y � I 0 0 1 Immokolae Rd 0 LEGEND FUNDED 4-LANE ARTERIAL 6-LANE ARTERIAL • 4-LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR — — — 2-LANE ARTERIAL 2-LANE COUECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD — MTRANSPORTATI❑N ENGINEI=RINm. INC. Imperial Lakes RPUD I N m i NORTH N.r.s. u� n' Lakes Blvd 4mmokolee Rd a a o .a a � rn m C I � Q � Project Location & Roadway Classification FIGURE 'I a 5U ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY 1N FEE SIMPLE i N 60' ROADWAY EASEMENT OR 238 PG 913 AND OR 242 PG 251 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 2[1a { V ZONE: I SCALE. 1" = 400' UNDEVELOPED ---FC.]TIIRP3II TFR�,l�.gMPMOPIAT- .-naLTUVAJnA so�01t 90 _-4ss ------_-===f ==w _ - - - - - �l AA , ZONED: A CONSERVATION COLLIER 6 WIDE PRESERVE j - - , RESERVATION BUFFER -- I5WIDE TYPES' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 6 WIDE I rrr rrrrr f RESERVATION PROJECT 1 ' �� BUFFER BOUNDARY ZONED A f - HIGH SCHOOL 15' WIDE TYPE �' rr rr R ' ►��c3o: L BUFFERPE rrr l I 1 IS WIDE TYPE'B' ZONED: A . ' . " - - \ _ t —LANDSCAPE BUFFER CONSE11VATTON COLLIER PRESERVE j[ TRACT"B'I R CASTLEWOOD AT IMPERIAL PUD PB39 PG 81-82 II RESIDENTLA . _ NO BUFFER RE_UIRED R � LEGEND �— ---- E?aSTING 15' EXISTING 69 EXISTING 50' ® DEVIATION DRAINAGE EASEMENT DRAINAGE EASF8viTNT R RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY 23 EASEMENT 913 OR 1864 PG 451459 PS 39, PG 81-82 DR 238 PG 913 AA AMENITY AREA L LAKE ZONED- GC P PRESERVE IMPERIAL GOLF CLUB �ti P&{��'i�1110C' a. cMva 1111i MHIia up ON cl,e IMPERIAL LAKES RPUD .41tw Y13 la 1 - RPS IMww-mmm lwcfmpnnv P&A. $pA.rL Pluada 3 r I S I mw EXHIBIT C 11 v111inglnlx;rs L�n1w sufvcYars I�1anRCIy [,al:dsrape nl,�Ilcects REVISED w.—sl oun�ISI cu�wnula.wawa�n, pwm...I.e xemme.R MASTER PiAisi 09/29/2025 - - D- ;prra": 299.947.11.14 kv w Ir, rragrnfan at. vnm Irun Nbcm; 239.If96.93BO YOHM 1 OF 2 61 Project Generated Traffic Traffic that can be expected to be generated by the project was estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, I I'h Edition. That is, historical traffic data collected at similar land uses was relied upon in estimating the project's traffic. It was concluded that land use codes Single -Family (LUC 210) and Multi -Family (LUC 220) were most appropriate in estimating the project traffic of the most intense land uses. Note, the project's traffic impact assessment is based upon the most -intense development scenario (i.e., Development Scenario A), which will generate a total net new nonvested (i.e., more than vested) trips of 85 PM peak hour trips. This study assesses the project's impact based upon the net new trips generated. Table l A and 1 B provide a detail of the estimated total trips for the two development scenarios. Table B provides a summary of the results. Table B Proposed Development Scenarios and Maximum Trips Cap Net PM Pk Hour Max Number Trips Cap Trips Increase Development Scenario Proposed of Dwelling Per vs. Land Use Units Dev. Scenario Vested Scenario C Trips Development Scenario A Single -Family 290 Trips (+} 85 Trips (Development Per GMP) and/or 313 d.u.'s 183 enter/107 exit (+) 54 enterl31 exit Multi -Family (Refer to Table IA) Development Scenario Bx 205 Trips (Vested Development) Multi -Family 430 d.u.'s 129 enter/76 exit None (Refer to Table 1 B) Note 2 Vested Development Rights - 430 multi -family dwelling units having a vested trip cap of 205 new PM peak hour two-way trips. The vested 430 multi -family units are equivalent to 216 single-family dwelling units that would also have a trip cap of 205 PM trips. The report concludes that the project will generate more than 50 net new nonvested trip ends during the weekday highest peak hour_ As such, the report investigates the traffic impacts associated with the project based upon the criteria set forth by the Collier County Government's Traffic Impact Statement Guidelines for developments generating "more than 50 trips", which is defined as a minor study. Note, the project's traffic impact assessment is based upon the most -intense development scenario (i.e., Development Scenario A), which will generate a total net new (i.e., more than vested) trips of 85 PM 7 TABLE 1A TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Imperial Lakes RP❑ Development by Right Land Use Cade Land Use Description Build Schedule 210 Single -Family Detached Housing 313 Units Cade Trip Period Trip Generation Equation LUC 210 Daily Traffic (ADT) = Ln(T) = 0.92Ln(X)+2.68 = AM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.91Ln(X)+0.12 = 26% Enter/ 74% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.94Ln(X)+0.27 = 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 2,883 ADT 210 Kph 55 / 156 vph 290 Kph 183 / 107 vph 7.1 TABLE 1B TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Imperial Lakes RPD Vested Development Rights Land UsQ Code Land Use Description 220 Multi -Family (Low Rise) Build Schedule 430 Units Land Use Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips Trips EnterzExit LUC 220 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T = 6.41(X) + 75.31= 2,832 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.31(X) + 22.85 = 156 vph 37 / 119 vph 24% Enter/ 76% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.43(X) + 20.55 = 205 vph 129 / 76 vph 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = Equivalent to the Vested Development Rights Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 210 Single -Family Detached Housing 216 Units Land Use Code Trip Period LUC 210 Daily Traffic (ADT) _ AM Peak Hour (vph) _ PM Peak Hour (vph) _ Trio Generation Equation Ln(T) = 0.92Ln(X)+2.68 = Ln(T) = 0.91Ln(X)+0.12 = 26% Enter/ 74% Exit = Ln(T) _ ❑.94Ln(X)+0.27 = 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 2,049 ADT 150 vph 39 1 111 vph 205 vph 129 f 76 vph peak hour trips. This study assesses the project's impact based upon the net new trips generated. Existing + Committed Road Network Table 2 provides a detail of the surrounding E + C road network and their respective minimum level of service performance standards and capacity. Access to the site will be created by extending Veterans Memorial Boulevard from its west terminus to the project site and extended to intersect Old 41 and U.S. 41 which will provide the project with an alternate means of ingress/egress from the west. Veterans Memorial Boulevard (west of Livingston Road) functions as a four -lane divided arterial that is approximately 1.5 miles in length and extends to the east and west at its intersection with Livingston Road. As funded per Collier County"s 5-year CIP, Veterans Memorial Boulevard (VMB) will be extended from its west terminus to intersect U.S. 41. The 2027 estimated and vested traffic for Veterans Memorial Boulevard (900 vphpd on Table 3) was based upon the assumption that the newly created parallel facility to Immokalee Road might have a demand of about 1 /3 that of the averaged demand along the same segments of lmmokalee Road. In this case, the averaged demand is slightly less than 900 but the results were rounded up to 900 vphpd. Livingston Road is classified as a six -lane divided arterial. The road functions as a primary north/south corridor that extends from its southern terminus at its intersection with Radio Road to the Collier/Lee County boundary where it continues north/south and is known as Imperial Parkway. Within proximity of the site, the posted speed limit of Livingston Road is 45 MPH. Livingston Road & Veterans Memorial Boulevard is a four-way signalized intersection. Project Generated Traffic Distribution The project's net new traffic was distributed to the surrounding road network based upon logical means of ingress/egress, current and future traffic patterns in the area and business opportunities, as well as growth trends for the surrounding areas. Figure 2 provides a detail of the traffic distributions based on a percentage basis and Table 2 depicts the expected net new AM and PM traffic assignments for peak hour peak direction and non - peak direction. Area of Significant Impact The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2%, 2% and 3% criteria (i.e., if the project's traffic is 2% or more of a roadway's adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Table 2 describes the project traffic distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. Roads that were identified as being within the project's area of impact are shown in ['able 2- 8 Pennsylvania Ave 1 �! Bonita Beach Rd Tamarind Cay Ln , I o-J 1 a. o �❑1 rl_ 1 45% Way i I Y 61 mI n Y C Dean L p i F i U C a a: f C yam.. N �I �I tv i — 55%— ra Vetens Mem. Blvd i Learning Lane , Ravinp Woy Entrada Ave I i a 4 I d I a 0 Immokaiee Rd 0 T—— LEGEND 1 5t L i � c i La a o O�- PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT %WTRAN^aPORTATICN ENGINEERINI;, INC. I T, L m m NORTH N.T.S. f f u� r. f r Lakes Blvd H i f IN U ! H i r T_rn_■..___�_ krnokalee Rd i o a Of f \ a- to3 Imperial Lakes RPUD Project -Generated FIGURE Z September 29, 2025 Traffic Distribution TABLE 2 PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = 54 Entering NET NEW NONVE5TED TRIPS Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) = 31 Exiting NET NEW NONVESTED TRIPS LOtiS Service Project Project PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project Roar! Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Nan-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significant Class LO5 v{ php) % Dist. V( phod) a Qir (vph) DiR Standard Imlact Impaat Veterans Memorial Blvd NW-TCMA N/A U.S. 41 to Site 4D ❑ 2000 45% 24 E 14 W 2% 1.20% No NW-TCMA NIA Site to Livingston Road 4D ❑ 2000 55% 30 W 17 E 2% 1.50% No Airport Pulling Rd NW-TCMA 4 1.0 Immokalee to Vanderbilt 4D ❑ 2200 15% 8 N 5 S 3% 0.36% No N Immokalee Road NW-TCMA 41.2 G o od lette-F ra n k to Airport 6D E 3100 5% 3 E 2 W 3% 0.10% No NW-TCMA 42.1 Airport Road to Livingston Rd 6D E 3100 15% 8 E 5 W 3% 0.26% No NWTCMA 42.2 Livingston Rd to 1.75 61D/813 E 3500 10% 5 W 3 E 3% 0.14% No Livingston Road NW-TCMA 51.a Imperial St to Veterans Memorial 6141D ❑ 3000 20% 11 S 6 N 2% 0.37% No NWTCMA 51.b Veterans Memorial to Immokalee R( 6140 D 3000 35% 19 N 11 S 2% 0.63% No NW-TCMA 52.0 Immokalee Rd to Vanderbilt 6D E 3100 10% 5 N 3 S 3% 0.16% No Old 41 NW-TCMA E2.a Lee/Collier Line to VMB Ext 2U D 1000 5% 3 S 2 N 2% 0.30% No NW-TCMA 62.ti VIM Ext to U.S. 41 21J D 1000 25% 14 N 8 S 2% 1,40% No Tamiami Trail North NW-TCMA 98.0 N. of Wiggins Pass 6D E 3100 25% 14 N 8 8 2% 0.45% No roadways. Roads that were identified as being within the project's area of impact are shown in Table 2. 2024 thru 2029 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions In order to establish 2024 thru 2029 project build -out traffic conditions, two forecasting methods were used. The first traffic forecasting method was the County's traffic count data was adjusted for peak season conditions, peak hour conditions, peak direction, and an annual growth rate was then applied. The peak season/peak hour/peak direction factor and annual growth rate were derived from the 2024 Collier County AUIR Report. Using the annual growth rate, the 2029 background traffic conditions were determined, which are depicted in Table 3- The second traffic forecasting method was to add the vested trips (trip bank) identified in the 2024 AUIR report to the adjusted peak season, peak hour and peak direction traffic counts. The 2029 vested trips "V' background traffic volumes are depicted in Table 3. The greater of the two values produced by the two forecasting procedures was then considered to reflect the 2029 background traffic. The net new nonvested project generated traffic was then added to the background traffic. Table 4 provides a summary of the 2024 thra 2029 traffic conditions and the roadways' level of service and remaining available capacity. As shown, all project impacted roadways will continue to operate at the County's adopted minimum level of service thresholds at project build -out. Based upon the findings of this report, it was determined that the two development alternatives for Imperial Lakes RPUD will not significantly or negatively impact the surrounding road network or cause any roadways to operate below their adopted level of service standard. It is noted that per Collier County's 2024 AUIR, the current traffic demand on the segment of U.S. 41 (between Immokalee Road and Wiggins Pass Road) and Old 41 (north of U.S. 41) exceeds the adopted level of service capacity_ These roadway links are not within the project's area of impact and are not significantly or negatively impacted by the project's net new trips. The project's vested trips (i.e., 205 two-way PM peak hour trips) are, by vested rights, included in the background traffic and the net new trips will not significantly or negatively impact these roadways. Those specific roadway links currently operate at a level of service that exceed their respective adopted LDS standards, regardless of the development of Imperial Lakes PUD. All other roadways, within the projects area of influence, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the net new traffic generated by the maximum development intensity of 313 single-family units or as vested up to 430 multi -family units having a vested trip cap of 205 new PM peak hour two-way trips. The vested 430 multi- family dwelling units are equivalent to 216 single-family dwelling units that would also have a trip cap of 205 PM trips. 0 TABLE 3 2024 & 2029 ROADWAY LINT{ VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Meths Per Growth Rate Method 2029 2027 2029 Peak Hour 2024 Estimated Growth Peak Hour PIS Direction AUIR & Vested AUIR Rate PIC Direction Trip Background Traffic Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips (Vphpol (vohod] DiR AUIR Ivnhodl { phpol (vohod) Veterans Memorial Blvd NW-TCMA NIA U.S. 41 to Site See Note 1 900 E 2.00% 936 936 NW-TCMA N/A Site to Livingston Road See Note 1 900 W 2.00% 936 936 Livingston Road NW-TCMA 51.a imperial St to Veterans Memorial 1570 N 2.61 % 1786 37 1607 NW-TCMA 51.b Veterans Memorial to Immokalee Rd 1570 N 2.61 % 1786 37 1607 NW-TCMA 52.0 Immokalee Rd to Vanderbilt 2100 N 2 00% 2319 0 2100 Immokalee Road NW-TCMA 41.2 G o od I ette- Fra n k to Airport 2620 E 2.15% 2914 27 2647 NW-TCMA 42.1 Airport Road to Livingston Rd 2930 E 2.00% 3235 3 2933 NW-TCMA 42.2 Livingston Rd to 1-75 3140 E 2.00°/a 3467 56 3196 Old 41 NW-TCMA 62.a LeelCollier Line to VMB Ext 1130 N 2.00% 1248 0 1130 NW-TCMA 62.b VMB Ext to U.S. 41 1130 N 2.00°/6 1248 0 1130 Note 1 The 2027 estimated and vested traffic for Veterans (900 vphpd) was based upon the assumption that the newly created parallel facility to Immokalee Road might have a demand of about 1/3 that of the averaged demand along the same segments of Immokalee Road. In this case, the averaged demand is slightly less than 900 but rounded up to 900. Veterans Memorial Blvd NW-TCMA NIA U.S. 41 to Site NW-TCMA NIA Site to Livingston Road Livingston Road NW-TCMA 51.a Imperial St to Veterans Men NW-TCMA fi1.b Veterans Memorial to Immo NW-TCMA 52.0 immokalee Rd to Vanderbilt TABLE 4 2029 ROADWAY LINT{ VOLUMEXAPACITY ANALYSIS 2029 2029 2029 2029 2029 2024 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build -Cut Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak How Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hour Project PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dh Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Direction Significant phpd, LOS (vphpol Dir LOS [Vphi)d) Dir (vvh) fir (phpd) (phpd) We Ratio LOS Impact 900 E 936 E B 24 E 14 W 961 2000 0.48 B No 900 W 936 W B 30 W 17 E 966 2000 0.48 B NO 1570 C 1786 N C 11 S 6 N 1792 3000 0.50 C No 1570 C 1786 N C 19 N 11 S 1805 3000 0.60 C No 2100 C 2319 N C 5 N 3 S 2324 3100 0.75 C No Co Ier COU14ty Growth Management Community Development Department Need Help? GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides L. WAIVER APPLICATION FROM REQUIRED HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT LDC Subsection 2.03.07 E 2.j. SUBMITTAL DATE: ASSIGNED PLANNER: PETITION NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH WAIVER: PL20250006588 PROJECT NAME: Imperial Lakes RPUD LOCATION: (Common Description) The PUD is located northeast of the Krehling concrete plant, north of the Imperial Golf Club and west of Castlewood at Imperial PUD. SUMMARY OF WAIVER REQUEST: See attached (Properties located within an area of Historical and Archaeological Probability but with a low potential for historical/archaeological sites may petition the Growth Management Community Development to waive the requirement for a Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment. Once the waiver application has been submitted, it shall be reviewed and acted upon within five (5) working days. The waiver request shall adequately demonstrate that the area has low potential for historical/archaeological sites.) Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 1 of 5 Planning and Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.coiliercountVfl.gov/ APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): N .A. Realty Trust, Inc Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 8156 Fiddler's Creek Pkwy City. Naples Telephone: 239.732.9400 Cell: E-Mail Address: parisij@gulfbay.com Name of Agent: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Firm: Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC State: FL ZIP: 34114 / Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. / Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Address: 3800 Via Del Rey City: Bonita Springs Telephone: 239.947.1144 Cell: E-Mail Address: warnold@gradyminor.com / ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com State: FL ZIP: 34134 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Property I.D. Number 00153160004 Section/Township/Range: 15 / 48 125 Subdivision: N•A• Block: N.A- Lot: N.A. Plat Book N.A. Page # N.A. Metes & Bounds Description. See attached Summary of Waiver Request If the applicant includes multiple contiguous parcels, the legal description may describe the perimeter boundary of the total area, and need not describe each individual parcel, except where different zoning requests are made on individual parcels. A boundary sketch is also required. Collier County has the right to reject any legal description, which is not sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property, and may require a certified survey or boundary sketch to be submitted. Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 2 of 5 PROPERTY INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS Size of Property: 1 268+/ft. x 2634+/- ft. Total Sq. ft. 3345408+/- Acres 78.28 Width Along Roadway: 1 ,268+/- feet Depth: 2, 634+/- feet Present Zoning Classification: Imperial Lakes RPUD Present Use of Property: Undeveloped REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with narrative statement detailing the reason for the waiver request Completed application with required attachments (download latest version) Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized Property Ownership Disclosure Form Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. Any other conditions in previously approved development order(s). ❑ ❑ Other: Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 3 of 5 WAIVER CRITERIA Note: This provision is to cover instances in which it is obvious that any archaeological or historic resource that may have existed has been destroyed. Examples would be evidence that a major building has been constructed on the site or that an area has been excavated. A. Waiver Request Justification. I . Interpretation of Aerial Photograph shows property is undeveloped 2. Historical Land Use Description: undeveloped 3. Land, cover, formation and vegetation description: The site contains vegetation and water retention areas. 4. Other: B. The County Manager or designee may deny a waiver, grant the waiver, or grant the waiver with conditions. He shall be authorized to require examination of the site by an accredited archaeologist where deemed appropriate. The applicant shall bear the cost of such evaluation by an independent accredited archaeologist. The decision of the County Manager or designee regarding the waiver request shall be provided to the applicant in writing. In the event of a denial of the waiver request, written notice shall be provided stating the reasons for such denial. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the County Manager or designee regarding a waiver request may appeal to the Preservation Board. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the Preservation Board regarding a waiver request may appeal that decision to the Board of County Commissioners. Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 4 of 5 CERTIFICATION A. The applicant shall be responsible for the accuracy and completeness of this application. Any time delays or additional expenses necessitated due to the submittal of inaccurate or incomplete information shall be the responsibility of the applicant. B. All information submitted with the application becomes a part of the public record and shall be a permanent part of the file. C. All attachments and exhibits submitted shall be of a size that will fit or conveniently fold to fit into a legal size (8 1/2" x 14") folder. Signature of Applicant or Agent D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Printed Name of Applicant or Agent TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION - NOTICE OF DECISION ::1 The County Manager or designee has made the following determination: ❑ Approved on: an ❑ Approved with Conditions on: By: (see attached) ❑ Denied on: (see attached) Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 5 of 5 Imperial Lakes RPUD (PL20250006588) Summary of Waiver Request The Imperial Lakes RPUD property is approximately 78.28± acres, which is undeveloped. The Archaeological Probability Map #1 shows the project is located east of known areas of Historical/Archaeological probability and south of an archaeological site (CR737). The small portion of the northwestern corner may be located within an area of Historical/Archaeological probability. The project is located in Section 15, Township 48 S, Range 25 E. trom hnvironmental KeDort: 2.7 HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Florida Master Site File (MSF) is a database of the known historic and archaeological sites in the state of Florida. The MSF office was contacted and the response back indicated that there were two recorded archaeological sites in close proximity to the subject property. One of these sites (CR00737) is located right on the northern border of the site. According to the State Historic Preseivation Office (SHPO) evaluation, this site was not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The second site (CR00242) is located approximately 3/4 of a mile west of the project site and will not be affected at all by the proposed project. If a suspected archaeological or historical artifact is discovered during the course of site development activities (construction, clearing, etc.), the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the fund and determine the proper course of action. July 11, zozs GradyMinor Summary of Waiver Request. docx Page 1 of 3 a PApm-oawsoN company Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com Historical/Archeological Map #1: July 11, 2025 Summary of Waiver Request. docx Page 2 of 3 Legal Description: THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHEAST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY OVER AND UNDER THE SOUTH THIRTY FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 10, AND ALSO ON, OVER AND UNDER THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH THIRTY FEET OF SAID SECTION 15 EXTENDING FROM THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) TO THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF SECTION 15 LESS ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND ALSO ON, OVER, AND UNDER A STRIP OF LAND SIXTY FEET IN WIDTH LYING THIRTY FEET ON EACH SIDE OF A LINE COMMON TO THE NORTH ONE-HALF AND THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF THAT PORTION OF SAID SECTION 15 LYING EAST OF U.S. HIGHWAY 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) RIGHT-OF-WAY EXCEPT THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, ALL LYING AND BEING IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONSISTING OF 78.28 ACRES MORE OR LESS. July 11, 2025 Summary of Waiver Request. docx Page 3 of 3 Strict Schoo/ 4 � TV � o � jollier ou- Collier County School District School Impact Analysis Application Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for each new residential project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management Department at 239-377-0267. Please check [v] type of application request (one only): OSchool Capacity Review Exemption Letter F-�Concurrency Determination [] Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, Project Name: Imperial Lakes PUD Project Information: Municipality: Collier County Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): 00153160004 Location/Address of subject property: North of Imperial Golf Club, west of Castlewood at imperial PU❑ Closest Major Intersection: U.S- 41 and Old 41 Road Owner/Contract Purchaser Name(s) Agent/Contact Person: n- Wayne Arnold, II. Ownership/Agent Information: N.H. Realty Trust, Ina. (Attach location map) (Please note that if agent or contact information is completed the District will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: 0. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Telephone#: 2 39-94 7-1144 Fax: Email warnoId@gradyminor.com I hereby certify the statements and/or information contained in this application with any attachments submitted herewith are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Owner or Authorized Agent Signature III. Development Information July 7, 2025 Date Project Data Unit Types defined on page 2 of application) Current Land Use Designation: Undeveloped Proposed Land Use Designation: Residential Current zoning: Imperial Lakes PUD Proposed Zoning: Imperial Lakes PUD Project Acreage: Unit Type: SF MF MH C G Total Units Currently Allowed by Type: 0 430 Total Units Proposed by Type: 313 430 Is this a phasedproject: Yes or No If yes, please complete page 2 of this application. Date/time stamp: Worksheet is required to be completed by the Applicant only if the project is to be phased: Unit Type Yrl Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yrb YO Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ Years SF MF MH C G Totals bv Yr Grand Total Insert totals by unit type by years. Unit Types: SF = Single Family MF = Multi-Family/Apartments MH = Mobile Homes C = Condo/Co-Op G = Government EXAMPLE: Unit Yrl Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yrb Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 YrI O Yr 1 1-20 20+ Years _Type SF 25 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- MF 50 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- MH NIA C NIA G NIA Totals by Yr 75 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Grand Total Grand Total I I50 2 Types of Reviews: School Impact Analysis: This review should be divided into two categories: - School Capacity Review (land use and rezonings), and; - Concurrency ❑eterminations (site plans and subdivisions). School Capacity Review is the review of a project in the land use and rezoning stage of development. It is a review of the impact of the development on school capacity and is considered long range planning. This may be a review resulting in mitigation being required. In situations where the applicant may be required to mitigate, capacity may be reserved dependent on the type of mitigation. Concurrency Determination is the review of residential site plans and subdivisions to determine whether there is available capacity. When capacity is determined to be available a School Capacity Determination Letter (SCADL) will be issued verifying available capacity to the applicant and the local government. If a project exceeds the adopted level of service standards, the applicant is afforded the option of a negotiation period that may ❑r may not result in an executed/recorded mitigation agreement Mitigation at this stage is expressed as a Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement. For those residential developments that may have an impact but are otherwise exempt from concurrency, an exemption letter will be prepared for the applicant upon request. For those residential developments that are determined to not have an impact, a letter of no impact will be prepared for the applicant upon request. Exemption Letter: An applicant may request an Exemption Letter as documentation for the local government. These are projects that would be exempt from school concurrency review or projects that d❑ not impact the public schools. Exemptions from school concurrency are limited to existing single family or mobile home lots of record; amendments to previously approved site plans or plats that do not increase the number of dwelling units or change the dwelling unit type; age restricted communities with no permanent residents under the age of 18; or residential site plans or plats or amendments to site plans or plats that generate less than one student; or are authorized as a Development of Regional Impact (Chapter 380, F.S.) as of July 1, 2005. Concurrency ❑etermination Amendment: An applicant may request an amendment to a previously issued School Concurrency ❑etermination or to an application being processed. This review may require additional staff time beyond the initial concurrency determination review and results in a modified determination being issued. An amendment could result in a negotiation period and/or a mitigation agreement being issued or a previously approved determination being modified and reissued. 3 war ORDINANCE 82- 81 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 82-2 THE COM- PREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCOR- PORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 48-25-5 BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "A-2 AND "ST" TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR IMPERIAL LAKES LOCATED NE OF KREHLINC CONCRETE PLANT AND NORTH OF IMPERIAL WEST GOLF COURSE ; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE: WHEREAS, Paul Toppino, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the Zoning Classification of the herein described real property; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Count4l Commissioners of Collier County. Florida: �. SECTION ONE: The Zoning Classification of the herein described real property'_ r -" located in Section 15, Township 48, Range 25, CollierCounty, Florida is changed from "A-2 and ST" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD document attached hereto as Exhibit "A" which is incorporated heroin and by reference made part hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas Map Number. Number 48-25-5, as described in Ordinance 82-2, is hereby amended accordingly: rn ir East of the NEIc of Section 15, Township 48 South. fi r2.. -71 Rance 25 East a -c CoCa x 1 of 9 ti? y i 800ic 019 PACT W ti �, t.....4 b0WWA..) • L ►aurricr , • Plll.f,l' GA11 • SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of notice that is has been filed with the Secretary of State. DATE: September 14, 1982 ATTEST: •,'" Oil LL;MI J. REAGAN, C t,01., C. R=82'--25e PUD +, S`I717, • OF FLORIDA ) COC1N N OF COLLIER ) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY : )A..�~ C. . ' L' VIM , CHAIRMAN I, WIII.IAM J. RE74CM, Clerk of Courts in and for the Nmtieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true original of: ORDINANCE NO. 82-81 which was adopted by the Board of County Cmmissioners during Regular Session September 14, 1982. WIn;ESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Com- missioners of Collier County, Florida, this 1.5th day of September, 1982. WII Z M J. REAMN • ' Clerk of Courts and Clret�c�' Ex-officio to Board' of County Commissioners 13Y • Deputy Clark'• '''••......... This ordinance filed with the Secretary of State's office the-21at day of September, 1982 and acknowledgement of that filing received this 23rc1 day of September, 1982. Virg magi , Deputrelerk bm 016 PACs 74 2 of 9 • sn N JL i1 L'�' if LD fu% •�111 IMPERIAL LAKES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT DISTRICT ZONE: PUD PERMITTED USES: Multi -family dwellings; temporary sewage treatment and disposal facilitj PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES 6 STRUCTURES: Recreational and utilitarian accessory uses and structures which are customary In multi -family residential communities; administrative and sales offices, which offices may be located In temporary or permanent structures and may bo located within a residential structure. Temporary commercial fill pits. Removal of commercial fill from a proje lake shall be tarminatod prior to the development of dwelling units on that lake, and shall only occur in accord with standards Incorporated In a County approved commercial excavation permit. MAXIMUM GROSS PROJECT DENSITY: 5.5 units per acre. Total dwelling unit count shall not exceed 430. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: MULTI -FAMILY SITES: Minimum building setback from street: 50 ft. from back of curb for multi -family structures, 30 ft. from back of curb for accessory structures. Minimum rear yard: 25 feet Minimum side yards: One-half the buiiding height, but not less than 10 feet. Maximum building height: 5 stories. Minimum dwelling unit floor area: 1,000 sq. ft. Minimum offstreet parking spaces: 2 spaces per dwelling unit, 1} of which shall be Improved, 1 /2 of which may be unimproved and landscaped. Planned, but unimproved spaces shall be Improved at a future date when warranted by the Zoning Director. 3of9 1 BOOK 016 PAU U f Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document Page 2. • MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING UNIT DISTRIBUTION: Multi -family dwelling unit distribution shall occur generally as Indicated on the approved Master Plan. Two or more adjoining multi -family sites may be joined to become a single development site. With the approval of the Director, minor changes in lot line location and in the distribution of multi -family dwelling units indicated on the approved Master Plan may be made, so long as the total multl-family dwelling unit count does not exceed 430. MASTER PLAN: The approved Imperial Lakes Master Plan shall also constitute the approved Subdivision Master Plan. STREETS: Streets within the project will be privately owned and maintained. All streets within the project shall be classified as local. EXCEPTIONS TO COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS: Article X, Section 19: Street name signs shall be approved by the County Engineer but need not meet the U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Street pavement painting, striping, and reflective edging requirements shall be waived, except at the project entrance drive and at interior intersections. Artic►e Xi, Section 17.F. & G.: Street right-of-way and cross section shall be as shown on the following page. Article Xi, Section 17.H.: The 1,000 ft. maximum dead-end street length requirement shall be waived. Article X1, Section 17.1.: Back of curb radii at street intersections shall be minimum of 30 feet. Article XI, Section 17.K.: The requirement for 100 ft. tangent section between reverse curves of streets shall be waived. Article XI, Section 21.: The requirement for blank utility casings shall be waived. 4 of 9 I Kq"K 016 Fne 72. 6mmJ Imperla,%( Lakes, Pub!, 'Pa6� 3. W HVIPEf IAL. LAKES • ROADWAY TYPIOALS >OI , �'- 4' 4/ 1 E A A A ORA3� PERIMETER ROAD N.T.S-. �i w—. SOUTHERN' INTERIOR ROAD N.T.S. NOTES I) ZICfI.IALK LOLATIOAJ �AQIF-fa AND \�✓IL.L MEANCETZ IN ANC OUT OF THE V(AHT-Of-WAY L.IWF-' Z)AD01-rIONAL UTILI'TI L°ASEnnew-rS OUTSIDL Rtt„HT-oF-WAY I-I►+ES AS CEOD. 3)Fu:ure connection may be allowed to perimeter road from soath easement. A. 12" STAaLIZED SUF3C rZADE Lf3 R ■ ?�C, �. C." LIMEROCK BASE (PRIMEO) I" ASPHALTIL CON—c rzF-Tc 7YPE. (5-1) MOO. �. SL JPE To MEET EXI4jT1N4 CaRADIL E. SIC!51-, ALK = a"THILK- 4' WIDE s%tr-r I as 2 ao�>< 016 PAru 73 , 3 5,of 9 11 5 as r o 'J*A GRADE C, P, ACCESS ROAD N.T.S. SEE NOTES ON DETAIL SHEET IOP2- to cy :lu fr. Cl 47, • imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document Pago S. PUD APPROVAL STIPULATIONS. The following stipulations were made a part of the Board of County Commissioners approval of this PUD document. TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS: 1. The developer shall provide left and right turn storage lanes on CR-887 at Its intersection with the project entrance road. 2. Fifty feet of right-of-way (1 /2 of a planned 100 ft. right- of-way) shall be reserved along the north property boundary to accomodate an east/west arterial road shown on the County Comprehensive Plan. If this planned oast/west arterial Is deleted from the comprehensive plan at a future date, the developer shall be released from this right-of-way reservation obligation. UTILITIES: 1. All construction plans and technical specification for the proposed Utility Facilities must be reviewed and approved by the Utility Division prior to commencement of construction. 2. All on -site and off -site Utility Facilities construction by the Developer in connection with the Development shall be constructed to County Standards at no cost to the County and shall be deeded to the County Water -Sewer District, In accordance with applicable County Ordinances and Regu- lations. 3. All customers connecting to the sanitary sewer and water distribution facilities will be customers of the County Water -Sewer District and will be billed in accordance with a rate structure approved by the County. 4. All construction of proposed sanitary sewer system shall utilize the proper methods and materials to Insure water tight conditions. 7 of 9 I DOCK Ole PAu 75 Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document Page 6. S. Data pertaining to percolation rates for the proposed sewage disposal ponds shall be submitted with the con- struction plans to aid in evaluating the capacity of the site to handle the proposed wastewater flow. G. Appropriate Utility Easement dedicated to the County Water -Sower District must be provided for the proposed water and sewer facilities to be constructed, when they do not lie within public right-of-way or Utility Easomen 7. Data required under County Ordinance No.80-112 must submitted and approved prior to approval of the constr documents for the project. A copy of the approved DE permit application for the sewage collection and transmit system and a copy of the approved DER permit applieat and construction permit for the wastewater treatment fa to be utilized shall be submitted to the County Utility Department. 8. The petitioner and/or his assigns acknowledges that ado water supply and pressure may not be available from tt County's Regional Water System to the project when cor structlon is ready to commence. 9. If both adequate supply and pressure are not available the time construction is to start, building permits will i be issued until the petitioner or his assigns presents p specifications, and cost estimates prepared by a Florida registered engineer to the Fire Control District and Utl Division for their approval. These documents must she that the petitioner Is able and committed to provide on - water supply or storage facilities adequate and capable meeting the water demands of the proposed developmen' .These on -site facilities must not adversely affect the operation and safety of the existing water supply and service area. 8 of 9 I Ec'JK 016 rh;i 76 Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development Document Page 7. 10. If interim on -site facilities are required, the Developer Is strongly encouraged to coordinate his planning efforts with Utilities Division. A Joint financial cooperation and effort on the part of the Developer and other Developers in similar circumstances may permit the construction of permanent facilities in advance of the Districts schedule and financial abilities. 11. Connection to the County's Central Water and Sewer facilities will be made by the owners, their assigns or successors, at no cost to the County Water -Sewer District within 90 days after such facilities become available. COMMERCIAL EXCAVATION PIT: 1. All applicable provisions of Excavation Ordinance No.80-26 shall be adhered to. Z. Depth of excavation is limited to elevation -7.0 ngvd. for the north lake (Lake 1) and -4.0 ngvd. for the south lake(Lake 11) and a water quality monitoring program shall be initiated. 3. No blasting shall be conducted unless a Blasting Permit is obtained from the County Engineer. 4. There shall be no off -site discharge of groundwater from the excavation pits. S. The commercial excavation shall not exceed three years in duration from the date of issuance of the excavation permit. 6. The South.easement may be used for hauling of fill for one GO year after start of operations of fill activity. 9 of 9 HE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT SITE Imperial Lakes RPUD (PL20250006588) Deviation justification 1. Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, "Street System Requirements" and "Appendix B, Typical Street Sections and Right -of -Way Design Standards". The LDC establishes a minimum 60- foot right of way width for local streets. This deviation proposes to instead allow for private roads within the site to be located in a 50-foot wide access easement or Right -of -Way. justification: Number of lanes, required lane width, and other infrastructure can be accommodated within the proposed 50-foot access easements or rights of way and the reduction in the minimum required width will provide for a more efficient and compact development project. The reduced right-of-way width will allow for more flexibility in designing the internal road network due to the presence of three separate wetland preserves and two existing lakes within the project. This deviation will not have a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community as the 50 foot right of way width is sufficient to accommodate all required elements for a local roadway. The internal roadways will be private and have no impact to the public. Deviation 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02 A.2, "Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements", which requires Sidewalks and bike lanes must be constructed within public and private rights -of -way or easements, which are internal to the site both sides of the local/internal accessway to instead allow the option to construct a sidewalk on one side and a bike path on the other side of the roadway as depicted on Exhibit E1. justification: This deviation is warranted as the owner wishes to provide the option for separating cyclists from pedestrians within the community. This has been successfully utilized by the applicant in the Fiddler's Creek development and is well utilized by residents of the community. The deviation will not have a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community and will provide a safer opportunity for both cyclists and pedestrians to move about the Imperial Lakes community without conflicts or requiring use of the local streets by cyclists. Deviation 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07 A.5., "Preservation Standards", which requires preservation areas shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors, to allow the onsite preserves to be non-contiguous. justification: The deviation is warranted because the native vegetation areas are not naturally contiguous on -site. The proposed preserves represent areas of the highest quality vegetation (wetlands) on -site and their locations are consistent with the SFWMD Permit application. The proposed preserves represent areas of the highest quality vegetation (wetlands) and buffering around a bald eagle nest tree. Their locations are consistent with the SFWMD Permit application. The deviation will not have a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community. The deviation will enhance the opportunity to preserve the highest quality native vegetation on site as well as an area surrounding a bald eagle nest. There will be no detrimental impact to the community by granting this deviation GradyMinar a vav�-owwsan rompany Deviation Justification-rl. docx September 29, 2025 Page 1 of 1 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-] 144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.gradyminor.com Nigh boyhood Information M¢¢ting AfSdavit of Compliance I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tox rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who hove made a formal request of the Coazn[y to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site pmperty of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, an�cgpy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Af£dayit of Compliance / \I [mperlal Lakes PUDA V 1 / PL20250006588 /\ <Sign of Applicant) STATE OF FLORIOA, COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowletlged before me by means of 0✓ Physical presence or Qonline registration this � day of October 20 25 by sna,on umpannour as senior planning Tarhnicinn who is Q personally known to me or Qhas produced ///j / entification. �£e'x yAtER1E N. PARKER / �' � � 9�i"� �' �s MIYCOMN18alON•NH aTl03r Sign a of Notary P bile •i: ��'` EKP6tES: tA•Y410A V aria N. Parker Print Name of Notary Public GradyMinor a Pape—DAWSON company Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING PETITION: PL20250006588 - Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment A formal application has been submitted to Collier County seeking approval of a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Amendment. The Imperial Lakes PUD is an existing 78+/- acre PUD and is vested for 430 conventional multi- family dwelling units. The PUD amendment proposes to add a range of dwelling unit types including single-family detached, two-family attached and townhomes. Appropriate development standards for each dwelling unit type have been added. The PUD will have a maximum of 430 total conventional dwelling units and an allowance for up to 750 dwelling units if affordable housing is provided. The PUD option to develop up to 750 multi -family dwellings if the project exceeds 430 dwelling units, is consistent with the affordable housing density bonus requirements per LDC 2.06.03. A percentage of the units above 430 units must meet the affordable housing density bonus requirement. In compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC (GradyMinor) and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. (Applicant) will be held at the location and time shown below. Headquarters Library, Sugden Theatre, 2385 Orange Blossom Dr, Naples, FL 34109 October 21, 2025, 5:30 pm (The Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program.) The subject property (Parcel ID:00153160004) consists of 78± acres and is located approximately 885 feet west of the terminus of Veterans Memorial Blvd., Collier County, Florida. Scan for Location Man RR... SLI6JECT���•ry PROPERTY `#'m i.._.._. •� 'u�ws I � q{V Veterans Memorial t3LVD :5 Ha.p.,,emorhi•BA' �_J >p�. Fwnricr •�i n... �iLLerdeex AVE�1'.'71 X 11 � WfJ�neY Q - iv rwcdr Lmn,+•r i If you have questions, contact Sharon Umpenhour with GradyMinor by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com or phone: 239-947-1144, Extension 4249. For project information or to register to participate remotely* visit our website at GradyMinor.com/Planning. Any information provided is subject to change until final approval by the governing authority. The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. *Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The applicant and GradyMinor are not responsible for technical issues. Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com PL20250006588- Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Parcelld OwnerLinel OwnerLine2 OwnerLine3 OwnerLine4 OwnerLine5 Country City State MailCode SiteStreetAddress 143120009 COLLIER CNN C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 USA NAPLES FL 34112 144640054 SOUSSI, MOHAMMED I C/O PREMIER DISPS (U K) LTD #16 CLIFFE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE SOUTH STREET LEWES EAST ENGLAND SUSSEX BN8611- 145680259 FADEL ETAL, BASHIR 1BNU YAHIAALLAITY STREET ANDALUSAREA LIBYA TRIPOLI 145681504 SEMINOLE GULF RAILWAY LP 4110 CENTERPOINTE DRIVE STE 207 USA FORT MYERS FL 33916 1439 WIGGINS PASS RD 146120006 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S USA NAPLES FL 34104 151600003 SCHOOL DISTRICT-GGG AUBREY ROGERS HIGH % SUPERINTENDENT 5775 OSCEOLA TRL USA NAPLES FL 34109 15100 PATRIOT PL 152600002 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 USA NAPLES FL 34112 14510 OLD 41 152960001 CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA LLC PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2883 USA WEST PALM BEACH FL 33402 153240005 IMPERIAL GOLF CLUB INC 1808 IMPERIAL GOLF CRS BLVD USA NAPLES FL 34110 1594IMPERIAL GOLF CO BLVD 153280007 CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA LLC PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2883 USA WEST PALM BCH FL 33402 1400 WIGGINS PASS RD 153840007 MCCABE, PATRICK L 13272 WEDGEFIELD DR USA NAPLES FL 34110 13272 WEDGEFIELD DR 154240004 IMPERIAL GOLF CLUB INC 1808 IMPERIAL GOLF CRS BLVD USA NAPLES FL 34110 25778041020 CASTLEWOOD AT IMPERIAL HOMEOWNER'S ASSN INC 74512TH AVE S STE 103 USA NAPLES FL 34102 25778041046 CASTLEWOOD AT IMPERIAL HOMEOWNER'S ASSN INC C/O MOORE PROPERTY MGMT 5603 NAPLES BLVD USA NAPLES FL 34109 1747 SUPREME CT 25778041224 PIETROPAOLO, TINA M & PANFILO 1741 SUPREME CT USA NAPLES FL 34110 1741 SUPREME CT 25778041240 WILLIAM D MURLICK LIVING TRUST SHARON K MURLICK LIVING TRUST 6062 HAMPTON CT USA BRIGHTON MI 48116 1745 SUPREME CT 25778041266 G R & P A BLAKE REV TRUST 1749 SUPREME CT USA NAPLES FL 34110 1749 SUPREME CT 25778041282 CHARLOTTE P FRANCEN REV TRUST 1753 SUPREME CT USA NAPLES FL 34110 1753 SUPREME CT 25778041305 SCARSELLA, JEAN 1757 SUPREME CT USA NAPLES FL 34110 1757 SUPREME CT 25778041321 EWING, PAUL W=& JULIE 1761 SUPREME CT USA NAPLES FL 34110 1761 SUPREME CT 25778041347 JUDITH ANN GOTSCHALL REV TRUST 1765 SUPREME CT USA NAPLES FL 34110 1765 SUPREME CT 25778041363 FIORITO, MARY E 1769 SUPREME COURT USA NAPLES FL 34110 1769 SUPREME CT 25778041622 LINDAA HOLMES TRUST 1740 SUPREME CT USA NAPLES FL 34110 1740 SUPREME CT 25778041648 REICHART, ANGELA C & JAMES J 1766 SUPREME CT USA NAPLES FL 34110 1766 SUPREME CT 59960012040 MEDITERRA COMMUNITY ASSN INC 15735 CORSO MEDITERRA CIR USA NAPLES FL 34110 59960012189 MEDITERRA COMMUNITY ASSN INC 15735 CORSO MEDITERRA CIR USA NAPLES FL 34110 15164 BROLIO LN 59960012529 TREVES, ALEXANDER K GRETCHEN F TREVES % COLEMAN YOVANOVICH & KOESTER 4001 TAMIAMI TRAIL N STE 300 USA NAPLES FL 34103 15210 BROLIO WAY IMPERIAL GOLF ESTATES HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION 1808 IMPERIAL GOLF CRS BLVD USA NAPLES FL 34110 500' Radius NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING PETITION: PL20250006588 — Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment A formal application has been submitted to Collier County seeking approval of a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Amendment. The Imperial Lakes PUD is an existing 78+/- acre PUD and is vested for 430 conventional multi- family dwelling units. The PUD amendment proposes to add a range of dwelling unit types including single-family detached, two-family attached and townhomes. Appropriate development standards for each dwelling unit type have been added. The PUD will have a maximum of 430 total conventional dwelling units and an allowance for up to 750 dwelling units if affordable housing is provided. The PUD option to develop up to 750 multi -family dwellings if the project exceeds 430 dwelling units, is consistent with the affordable housing density bonus requirements per LDC 2.06.03. A percentage of the units above 430 units must meet the affordable housing density bonus requirement. In compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of 0. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC (GradyMinor) and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. (Applicant) will be held at the location and time shown below. Headquarters Library, Sugden Theatre, 2385 Orange Blossom Dr, Naples, FL 34109 October 21, 2025, 5:30 pm (The Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program.) The subject property (Parcel ID: 00153160004) consists of 78± acres and is located approximately 885 feet west of the terminus of Veterans Memorial Blvd., Collier County, Florida. r;y wv 74 SUBJECT — r.q PROPERTY t' d i... fVelerans MemUfiaTi3q.VD i� "s Y r4aF Ll �` If you have questions, contact Sharon Umpenhour with GradyMinor by email: sumpenhourC gradyminor.com or phone: 239-947-1144, Extension 4249. For project information or to register to participate remotely* visit our website at GradyMinor.com/Planning. Any information provided is subject to change until final approval by the governing authority. The Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. *Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The applicant and GradyMinor are not responsible for technical issues. ND42645941 October 21, 2025, Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) GradyMinor a PAPE-DAWSON Company Project information and a copy of this presentation can be found on our website: GRADYMINOR.COM/PLANNING/ PROJECT TEAM: • N.A. Realty Trust, Inc. - Applicant • Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., Land Use Attorney - Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. • D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner - Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC • James M. Banks, P.E., Traffic Engineer - JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. • Tim Hall, Environmental Consultant - Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. *Please note, all information provided is subject to change until final approval by the governing authority. LOCATION MAP % n y' •� l e rrf !l ee•+.+i %.yr • f ` N� ,. Y .. � �. r�r :1 .mac ; ,,;;y '■ I Y IL 3 CONSERVATION COLLIER LAND CONSERVATION COLLIER LAND AUBREY ROGERS H.S. IMPERIAL GOLF COURSE FUTURE LAND USE (FLU) DESIGNATION: Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict ZONING: Imperial Lakes Planned Unit Development (PUD) PROJECT ACREAGE: 78.2+/- acres PROPOSED REQUEST: • Add a range of dwelling unit types including single-family detached, two-family attached and townhomes • Vested for 430 multi -family dwelling units MAXIMUM DENSITY: A maximum of 430 multi -family residential dwelling units or up to 313 residential dwelling units in any combination of dwelling unit types, not to exceed the trip cap specified in Exhibit F, item 3.C, shall be permitted within the RPUD. 120. LO RISE UNITS GROSS'; PROJECT AREA: 78.28 ACRES 310_ MID-RISE`IdN1TS GROSS. DENSITY: 5.49 UNITS/ACRE 43-0 TOTAL UNITS — - — L ry � II '•1 — Nry , ili LAKE it a� LAKE fF w I1I 1 ;mc I - w W I, VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD I CTTF TIATA TOTAL SITE AREA: 78.28E AC VETERANS MEMORIAL ROW 1.47E AC (2%) RESIDENTIAL 49.75E AC (64%) AMENITY AREA 2.2-h AC (3Fly) PRESERVE 15.45E AC (19°%) WATER MANAGEMENT 9.41E AC (12%) MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS (SEE NOTE 3): MULTI -FAMILY: 430 (5.6 DU/AC) ANY COMBINATION OF DWELLING UNIT TYPES- 313 (4.0 DU/AC) PRESERVE: REQUIRED: 11.97E ACRES (47.86f ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION X 25°/a) PROVIDED- 15.45E ACRES CIPFTV SPACT.- REQUIRED: 46± ACRES (78.28f AC - 1.47E AC (VETERANS MEMORIAL ROW) = 76.81 X 60%) PROVIDED- 4&L ACRES DEVIATIONS (SEE EXHB3IT E) RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.0 LN, "STREET SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS" AND "APPENDIX B, TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DESIGN STANDARDS. 2❑ RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.02 A.2, "SIDEWALKS, BIICE LANE AND PATHWAY REQUIREMENTS". 0 RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 3.05.07 A.5, "PRESERVATION STANDARDS". 5V ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY IN FEE SID4PLE 60' ROADWAYEASELT-W OR 239 PG 913 AND OR 242 PG 251 20' WIDE T TE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER ZONE: I UNDEVELOPED -------------- __Fk:ll-iR-F.Zk'CE R:F; A4.45C�H{„E - ZONED: A CO,NSERVATfON COLLIER PRESERVE I I� I SIR PRDJECT��� BOLINDAR� I �I 1T WIDE TYPE B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ZONED: A CONSERVATION COLLIER PRESFRZE LEGEND DEVIATION R RESIDENTIAL AA AMENITY AREA L LAKE P PRESERVE R rr ti r rrrrr R R �rr�rrr ` rrr�r � rr rr r m RSYROA�ENT O238 PG 913 ©i"N VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD 6 WIDE RESEILVATION SUFFER -IS RIDE TYPE B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER RES£OL itvnTlON BUFFER i ZONED: A HIGiSCHOOL f 4� f 15'L6'IDETYPE'B' 1 LAMWAPEBUFFFR IRACF'W' CASTLE WD AT E,4PF7trai PUD RESIDENTTAI. RFiLUmmt_�R----___ l TING 15' ESG5TING50 DRAINAGE EA5TTAFFTf DRAINAGE EASENIEN T OR 1864 PG 451 A59 PB 39, PG 81-82 ZONED: GC LV1PERIAL GOLF CLUB 7 Deviation 1: Relief from LDC Section 6.06.01, "Street System Requirements" and "Appendix B, Typical Street Sections and Right -of -Way Design Standards". The LDC establishes a minimum 60-foot right of way width for local streets. This deviation proposes to instead allow for private roads within the site to be located in a 50-foot wide access easement or Right -of -Way. See Exhibit E1, Typical ROW Cross Section. Deviation 2: Relief from LDC Section6.06.02 A.2, "Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements", which requires Sidewalks and bike lanes must be constructed within public and private rights -of - way or easements, which are internal to the site both sides of the local/internal accessway to instead allow the option to construct a sidewalk on one side and a bike path on the other side of the roadway as depicted on Exhibit El. Deviation 3: Relief from LDC Section 3.05.07 A.5., "Preservation Standards", which requires preservation areas shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors, to instead allow the onsite preserves to be non-contiguous. r� R R , NO BUFFER REQUIRED PROPOSED: APPROVED: (Ordinance 82 PERMITTED USES - Multi -family dwellings; temporary sewage treatment and disposal facility. PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES b STRUCTURES; Recreational and utilitarian accessory uses and structures which arc customary In multi -family residential communities; administrative and sales offices, which offices may be located In temporary or permanent structures and may be located within a residential structure. Temporary commercial fill pits. Removal of commercial fill from a project lake shall bo terminated prior to the development of dwelling units on that lake, and shall only occur in accord with standards Incorporated In a County approved commercial excavation permit. 1. RESIDENTIAL TRACT: A Principal Uses: 1. Residential Dwelling Units a. Single FanvlyResidendal; b. Two family; c. Townhouse; d. Multi -family Residential; 2. Gatehouses and access control structures. 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not hinite d to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas. 4. Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing. S. Any other use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or the hearing examiner. II. AMENITY AREA TRACE: A Principal Uses: 1. Clubhouses with cafes, snack bars and similar uses intended to serve residents and guests, 2. Community administrative and recreation facilities. Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis/pickle ball courts and basketball courts, parks, playgrounds, pedestrian/bikeways, and passive and/or active water features (private intended for use by the residents and their guests only). 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, bikeways, landscape nurseries, gazebos, boat and canoe docks, fishing piers, picnic areas, fitness trails and shelters to serve residents and their guests. 4. Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing (permitted until 90% of project sales are complete). PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES *2, SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED TOWNHOUSE TWO FAMILY MULTI- FAMILY AMENITY CENTER Minimum Floor Area [per unit] 1,250 SF 1,200 SF 1,900 SF 700 N/A Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 1,600 SF 3,500 SF 1 acre 5,000 SF Minimum Lot Width 50 feet 16 feet 35 feet 100 feet N/A Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 100 feet 90 feet 100 feet NIA Minimum Setbacks Front Yard *6 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet N/A Side Yard 5 feet 5 feet *7 5 feet'*7 10 feet 5 feet Rear Yard *4 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet PUD Boundary 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet Preserve 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Minimum Distance Between Structures 10 feet 10 feet *3 10 feet *3 10 feet N/A Maximum Height *5 Zoned Actual 35 feet 45 feet 35 feet 45 feet 35 feet 45 feet 60 feet 70 feet 35 feet 45 feet ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Minimum Setbacks *1 Front Yard *6 SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Side Yard SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Rear Yard *4 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet PUD Boundary 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Preserve 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Distance Between Structures 10 feet 10 feet *3 10 feet *3 10 feet 10 feet Maximum Height *5 Zoned Actual 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 35 feet 45 feet SPS - Same as Principal Structure *1- Does not apply to passive recreational uses such as trails/pathways, which may be located within internal open space areas. *2 - Community structures such as guardhouses, gatehouses, fences, walls, columns, decorative architectural features, streetscape, passive parks and access control structures shall have no required internal setback, and are permitted throughout the PUD; however, such structures shall be located such that they do not cause vehicular stacking into the road right-of-way or create site distance issues for motorists and pedestrians or where they would conflict with utility standards for required separation between utility infrastructure and buildings or structures. *3 - Zero feet if attached, 10 feet if detached. *4 - May be reduced to O feet where abutting an open space, water management or landscape buffer tract, provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into design. *5 - Maximum Height for Guardhouses/Gatehouses: Zoned: 25' Actual: 30' *6 - Applies to attached or detached Garages. Front facing garages shall provide a minimum of 23 feet from sidewalk to the garage. *7 - Zero feet if attached, 5 feet if detached. General Notes: a. Nothingin this PUD Document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in the list of deviations in Exhibit E. b. Seth acks must comely with the required separation between utilitv infrastructure and buildings or structures provided in the Utilitv Standards and Procedures Ordinance. Chanter 134. Article III of the Collier Countv Code of Laws and Ordinances • File resubmittal • CCPC and BCC Hearing Notices mailed by Collier County to adjacent property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. • CCPC and BCC Hearing sign posted by applicant on property advertising hearing dates. • HEARING DATES: • CCPC - TBD, 9:00 a.m., Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd floor BCC Chamber, Naples, FL, 34112 • BCC - TBD, 9:00 a.m., Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd floor BCC Chamber, Naples, FL, 34112 11 WWW. GRADYMINOR.COM/PLANNING Collier County Growth Management Department (GMD) Public Portal: https:/Tportal.colliercouniyfl.gov/Ci!yViewWeb/Planning/Locator Petition Number: PL20250006588 CONTACTS: M in QI 0M • Q. Grady Minor and Associates, LLC: Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician; sumpenhour@gradyminor.com or 239.947.1144, Ext. 4249 • Collier County Staff: Laura DeJohn; Laura. deiohn@collier.g_ov, (239) 252-2484 �r Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript Wayne Arnold: 00:00 1 think the sound's carrying fine in this area, so I apologize. If you want to move forward, we got plenty of seats right here. So I'll try to speak up as loud as I can and we'll move on through it. 00:11 So we're here for a project called the Imperial Lakes Planned Development. And we're in the process of amending that PUD that was approved many years ago. 00:21 So let me make a few introductions here. Our team consists of Rich Yovanovich, our counsel, who's here. We have representatives from Atwell here, who's going to be the civil engineer. This is Sharon Umpenhour, who's recording the meeting for us tonight. And Laura DeJohn is the county staff person in attendance. She'll be monitoring the meeting. 00:43 So the Imperial Lakes Project is shown here on the aerial photograph. It's on the extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard and it's immediately west of the new Aubrey Rogers High School. 00:57 So this project was originally zoned back in the early 1980s for 430 multifamily housing units. And we filed an amendment a couple of months ago to increase that density to 750 with an affordable housing component. And since we filed the application, we have abandoned the affordable housing component and the 750 unit request has been withdrawn. 01:22 So our request is to retain the 430 multifamily units or to develop a combination of multifamily and single family at a maximum density of 313 units. We were vested back before the county adopted its more recent comprehensive plan when it allowed higher densities in this area than it does today. Today the general cap of development is about four units per acre, which is the 313 units. 01:50 Just some of the locations that it shows you. Imperial Golf Course is to our south. Aubrey Rogers High School is to the east. Conservation Collier owns the two tracks of land immediately west and north of us. 02:02 And obviously there's a planned expansion and extension of Veterans Memorial all the way over to US 41 that will go across the site. And part of the reason the site was vested several years ago, the owner dedicated an easement for Collier County so that they could expand that roadway across their property. IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page I of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript 02:21 Again, our request is to amend the existing community. And as I said, it's already allowed to have 430 multifamily today, but it didn't make any provisions for there to be anything other than multifamily. So part of our request is to offer a variety of housing types that would include single family, two family, multifamily, and town homes. And we would restrict that density if it's a combination of dwellings to 313 units. 02:48 This is the existing adopted master plan which features two lakes and a couple of preserve areas. If you look back at the area, there was former excavation on site. There was a commercial excavation that occurred, which created the lakes. And there's actually an easement that goes west through the trailing on the south side of this property that's depicted there. But all of those tracks were meant to be multifamily development tracks. 03:14 So we've created a newer master plan and it's configured still with a - Automated: 03:22 Recording in progress. Wayne: 03:23 ... with a roadway network that circulates around the site. We only connect to Veterans Memorial Boulevard. There's no connection proposed to the east, west, or south. And we've identified the preserve areas in the P in the crosshatch section. They're a little different than it was on the original master plan, but we have updated information that Turrell, Hall has been working on. 03:44 And there's also, you see a circle to the right side of the exhibit, there's an eagle nest that's right on the property line of Aubrey Rogers High School. And that radius where you have a protected radius extends onto our property. So that's one of the features of the site. 04:03 We've asked for a couple of deviations here, actually three of them. And two of them were previously approved back in the 1980s and we're carrying those forward, but with new references. We've asked for the internal roads to be a minimum of 50 feet wide rather than 60 feet. And we've also asked for there to be an alternative to the sidewalk, which would allow us to put a sidewalk on one side of the local street and a bike path on the other side of the street, to give the people an option to either circulate to the amenity center by either bike or pathway. IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 2 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript 04:39 And the other deviation relates to the preserves. Collier County requires that we have our preserves to be interconnected through the property, but they don't occur naturally in that state. So we've asked for those preserves that are not connected to not be connected by county standard. And so I think that's pretty straightforward request. 05:03 Again, I have language up here that talks about multifamily owners on the original approval. And then you can see we've asked for single family, two family, townhouse, and multifamily for the revised master plan. We have development standards that we've proposed. The prior approval for the multifamily allowed for five story multifamily buildings throughout the site. We've asked for now the county prefers a guess for actual and zone height numbers. So we've asked for a zone height of 60 feet with an actual height of 70 feet. That would, again, allow probably the same five -story buildings that were previously permitted. 05:43 Just to explain where we are in the process, so we've submitted our application to the county. They've made comments on our original submittal. We're in the process of responding to their comments and we'll be submitting those changes very soon. And they'll again, Laura might be new or I can't remember if we even had the conversation about withdrawing the affordable housing requests, but you'll see that in our response letter. 06:09 So this is a required informational meeting for the county that we do to let the community that surrounds us know what we're doing. And if you have some questions or input, we'll be happy to take those. Our next step will be to continue to work with the county, and then ultimately we'll go to the planning commission, and then to the board of county commissioners for final decision. But no hearing dates have been established for that at this time. 06:32 So we've got those as to be determined on the screen. And then we usually like to conclude with some information here that if you're interested, you can take a photo of this or you can go to our webpage or you can go to the county's portal and follow along as we make public submittals. Then those are live on our website. And on the county's websites, you can follow along with the changes that occur. 06:56 If you received notice for this meeting tonight, you should receive the next notice from Collier County when we're scheduled to go to the planning commission sometime, probably after the first of the year at this point, I would imagine. IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 3 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript But that, in a nutshell, is what we're proposing to do, so if anybody has any questions, comments, we'll open up the floor. And try to speak up or if you can come forward and use the microphone, that would probably be best. Yes, sir? Can you come forward or speak up? Speaker 3: 07:20 How will you gain access to the property? Wayne: 07:21 I'm sorry, I couldn't understand what you were saying. Speaker 3: 07:22 How will you gain access to the property? Wayne: 07:24 Okay. Access to the property will be with an extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard. Go back to an aerial here. So you can see to the east on the northeast corner is the high school. And they extended Veterans Memorial to their property line. And we'll be working out an agreement with staff, how that's going to occur. 07:46 It could work out so that our timing for development coincides with their improvement. Because it's in the five-year work plan for them to go ahead and extend Veterans Memorial, but otherwise we would have a developer agreement so that we would probably build it and have some form of reimbursement with the county. Yes, ma'am? Speaker 4: 08:03 You're back up to our Castlewood's Lake. Now, what are you going to do so that your plan and your homes aren't going to be obstructing, are going to lower our - Speaker 3: 08:18 Will there be any kind of a buffer between them and us? Wayne: 08:21 Yes, there is. There's a required buffer. So you can see most of our eastern property line has a large preserve in the middle. But your lake is a little farther south and we're required to have a 15-foot wide type B landscape buffer that would be for multi- family to another use. 08:37 And the type B buffer is it can be a combination of a berm, a wall, a hedge that has to be planted and become six foot high and 80% opaque within one year. So that's kind of what the county requires us to do. We don't know at this point if we are doing any kind of fence or wall or berm combination, but that's the type of buffer we're proposing. Speaker 5: 08:59 How many story units are these? IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 4 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript Wayne: 09:02 Well, we're defining this, the question was how many stories are these units? So the existing zoning allows for five stories. It didn't express a height. So we're having to put this in terms of numbers of feet. So we're proposing a zoned height of 60 feet and an actual height of 70 feet, which gets about the same five - story building that's permitted today. Speaker 4: 09:23 And where would they be located on the property? Wayne: 09:26 The designation for multifamily and single family and other types hasn't been defined, so they could occur throughout. But keep in mind that the existing plan today... Oops. That plan allows multifamily to be five stories everywhere that there's a development track on that side, including to the southeast. So we think that the plan is very similar and compatible with what was previously approved. Speaker 4: 09:55 And what will be the ratio between a multi -story and individual? Wayne: 10:05 So the question is the ratio between the multifamily and the single family or other types. We don't know yet. I mean, there's a chance it could be 100% multifamily, but there's a better chance that it's going to be a mixture of the two but that's not been defined yet. Speaker 5: 10:18 Do you have any pictures, drawings, or whatever of what these units look like? Wayne: 10:23 We do not. No, there's been really... This is the stage of zoning, we, again, it's already been approved for the 430 multifamily units and we don't identify the architectural style yet. This gentleman behind you, sir. Yes, sir, in the blue shirt? Speaker 6: 10:41 Can we get a copy of this presentation? Wayne: 10:43 You sure can. If you'll get Sharon's card on the back table and you can email her or call her. And we'll be happy to either mail you one or email you a copy of it. Or it's available on the website that I had identified at the end of the presentation. 11:00 Yes, sir. Have another question? Speaker 3: 11:02 In the event that you did not get this amendment through, would you resort back to the 313 that you originally was? Wayne: 11:12 Well, we were originally approved for 430. So our option would be to either continue on with this and get the option to add IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 5 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript single family townhouse and two family to the multifamily mix and then reduce the density. Otherwise, our only option would be to develop the maximum of 430 units as all multifamily. Speaker 3: 11:30 And what would be the maximum height of those units? Wayne: 11:31 Those are already approved to be five stories tall. Speaker 3: 11:36 Thank you. Wayne: 11:39 Yes, ma'am? Speaker 7: 11:39 Is there any kind of price range that you were going to start these units at? Wayne: 11:44 No, they're all market rate now that we've withdrawn the request for affordable housing. So whatever the market bears when these come out of the ground. At this point, we're starting the water management district and environmental resource permitting process. And that's going to take us, I don't know, gosh, six months at least to get through that process. 12:04 And then go through the other county approvals once they determine if it's multifamily, they do an administrative site plan review. If it becomes single family or two family or townhouse, they have to go through a planning process and that takes many more months to get through the county. And then you have to mobilize and actually construct it. So it's probably at least a year out before anything can even come out of the ground here. Speaker 8: 12:27 The multi dwelling - Wayne: 12:28 Yes, sir? Speaker 8: 12:29 Oh, sorry. Wayne: 12:30 You can go ahead, ma'am. Speaker 8: 12:31 Multi dwelling, will that be a mix of ownership and rental? Or just straight one or the other? Wayne: 12:38 Well, we didn't define whether or not those units would be rentals or owner occupied. It's just multifamily as a dwelling unit type, just as the prior zoning allowed. Yes, sir? Speaker 3: 12:49 In the event you do get approval for low income housing, can you give us an idea? IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 6 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript Speaker 10: 12:57 They're not doing that. Speaker 3: 12:57 You withdrew it? Wayne: 12:57 Yeah, we have withdrawn the request for affordable housing. Speaker 3: 12:59 I'm sorry, I did not hear that. Wayne: 13:04 Okay. Yes, sir? Speaker 6: 13:05 Can you go back to your proposed map? Since Castlewood is the only single family housing development that abuts your property, why can't you put us or give us a bigger buffer there so that we're not looking at your stuff? Speaker 7: 13:22 [inaudible 00:13:29] five -story buildings. Speaker 4: 13:22 That's not even our property though. That's the high school abuts. Speaker 6: 13:22 But this all, there's the high school and the planned commercial. Wayne: 13:39 Keep in mind, the buffers that we provided are what the code requires us to provide. And it doesn't mean that you can't create larger buffers. But at this point, your comment's well noted and and we can certainly look at that. Speaker 6: 13:50 1 think we're going to demand that because we're going to attend every meeting. And we're just not in favor without having some protection. Wayne: 13:57 Understood. Speaker 9: 13:57 Keep on applying. Speaker 7: 13:57 We do make [inaudible 00:14:02]. Wayne: 14:02 Hang on. We're trying to record. We can't have more than one person talk at a time. What's your comment, ma'am? Speaker 9: 14:07 1 was just saying, that doesn't abut the houses in Castlewood. It abuts the lake and a golf course of Imperial Golf Course. Speaker 4: 14:20 But we own the lake. Speaker 9: 14:23 Yes. The high school abuts the houses. IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 7 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript Wayne: 14:25 Yeah, you can see that the lake separates you from our property line. Speaker 7: 14:29 It's not that big of a lake. Wayne: 14:32 I'm just telling you the facts that you're separated by a lake. So yes, have a comment here? Speaker 10: 14:37 Can you go back to what's approved today? Wayne: 14:38 Sure. Speaker 10: 14:45 Okay. So right there is what, without any zoning change, you could build, correct? Wayne: 14:50 That's correct. Speaker 10: 14:51 And 430 units. Wayne: 14:53 Correct. Speaker 10: 14:54 When I look at the southern end, which seems to be Castlewood's, doesn't that have a road? I see Cypress Preserve and the lake, but what's on the south side of the road? Wayne: 15:06 There's a drainage easement and a roadway easement. Speaker 10: 15:09 So would there be any residences? Wayne: 15:12 No, there are no residences. Well, there could be residences on our side, but there are no residences on the - Speaker 10: 15:19 Golf course. Wayne: 15:20 On the golf course side, obviously. Speaker 10: 15:21 So if you would, Wayne, go back to the, what's currently approved. I'm trying to figure out, because we can't read the very below. Is that development on the south side of the road, closest to them? Speaker 4: 15:36 We're actually on the eastern side. Wayne: 15:39 Their project is located here. There's a drainage easement here. There's a drainage easement and a roadway easement that runs across the south boundary. But the homes for Castlewood are located roughly in here. IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 8 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript Speaker 10: 15:54 So right now to their property, what would be the setback and the vegetation on their side currently as it speaks? What's the distance? Wayne: 16:07 Well, if we developed it today, we would be required to put in the type B buffer that we're proposing. Speaker 10: 16:12 Same thing? Wayne: 16:13 Same thing. Speaker 10: 16:14 Okay. Go now to what you're asking for. Okay. First of all, the roads that you're reducing from 60 feet to 50 feet, one, is that what development has done recently? Like there are lots of PUDs that - Wayne: 16:33 Yes. It's a very common deviation that we ask for. A public county road is typically 60 feet, and we typically ask for a 50- foot right of way. This was previously approved actually, if you look at the document. There's some diagrams in there, and they allow 50-foot private roadways inside the community today. Speaker 10: 16:50 Okay. Because Veterans Memorial is not developed in front of you, you may have some notice requirements. Could we request that those be put more out at Old 41 and/or Livingston where... Because if you put them on your property, which I know is probably the code, but just so more people know that this is... Is that something that could be done? Wayne: 17:16 Well, it's subject to whoever owns the property allowing us to do that. Rich and I are working on another project and some of the neighbors wanted us to put the notice on their property closer to Collier Boulevard. And the homeowner's association told us, "No, thank you. We don't want to talk to you." 17:29 So we had no option but to post them only on our site. So we can certainly talk to the school district or somebody where at least they can be put at the end of the road, but I can't guarantee that that would happen. Speaker 10: 17:40 1 was curious. Wayne: 17:40 But we'll note that for sure. Speaker 10: 17:41 Sidewalks on one side of the street, as well as you say bike, is that another sidewalk? Or is that on the street? IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 9 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript Wayne: 17:50 It would be a separate bike path off the street is what we're proposing. So we would have one side would have a sidewalk and the other side would have some, a bike path to try to separate pedestrians from bikers that might be wanting to utilize the site. 18:04 It's something that the developers utilized in Fiddlers Creek and I think there's another property in Pelican Bay that has kind of a similar concept. Staff hasn't taken a position on that, so I don't know if they're going to support that or not but that is our request. Yes, ma'am? Speaker 9: 18:23 Because we're a gated community, do you have any specifics you have to do, whether you have to put up a wall or protect our property? Or is there anything that you have to do in compliance? Wayne: 18:36 No, we have to provide buffers according to code, but it's very likely we're going to be a gated community as well. But I don't know what, if we're going to put up a perimeter fence or anything. I don't know if we would do that or not. Yes, ma'am? Speaker 8: 18:52 The road that you're showing on the lower right-hand corner, okay, that would be, Castlewood would be to the right of that? Wayne: 18:58 Correct. Speaker 8: 18:59 Would the buildings be... Would that road be on the inside of the property or the outside of the property? So in other words, the building would be on the right-hand side? Wayne: 19:06 Correct. Speaker 8: 19:06 Then the road? Wayne: 19:06 This is designed so that buildings could be anywhere in this [inaudible 00:19:14], on this side of the road or on the inside of the road in that area. I saw another hand up somewhere. Yes, sir? Speaker 3: 19:24 Do you envision that Veterans Memorial is going to be extended over to 41? 1 mean, that's going to be very tight access for that piece of property. Wayne: 19:32 It is. It's our understanding, talking to Trinity Scott at the county, that that road is funded and it's going to be built within the next five years over to 41. IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 10 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript Speaker 9: 19:41 That's how we hear about it. Speaker 3: 19:45 Well, I didn't think they were making this progress. Wayne: 19:48 Any other questions, comments? Yes, sir? Speaker 10: 19:51 Transportation. At 430 you're vested. So you already meet all of the traffic patterns or do you have to do any kind of a trip? Wayne: 20:04 We've had to prepare a new traffic analysis and we'll have a trip cap established for this project. It'll probably be based on the 313 lower number because theoretically those could all be single family. But we run the numbers and we don't think there's any, there's certainly no network issues associated with what we're proposing. Speaker 6: 20:24 What do you mean by network issues? Wayne: 20:28 The county looks at their network of public roads and we have to analyze our impacts on different segments of that road. Speaker 10: 20:35 In that document, the county or the, whoever it is, it was Banks. Wayne: 20:41 Yes. Speaker 10: 20:42 He talks about a 199 VPH. So with the lowering of the dead speed, do you see that being an issue or not? Wayne: 20:50 1 don't think so. I mean, we'll have a revised traffic analysis to accompany this submittal. And we'll see what Mike Sawyer and the county staff have to say, but we don't expect any issues. Yes, ma'am? Speaker 8: 21:03 The lakes that are there now, the problem we have in Imperial is with sheet flow because all the sheet flow goes south. So everything will come through where Castlewood is, where the golf course is, and across that area. 21:22 What are the plans about discussing the sheet flow? Because we had a problem with Mediterra when they built their wall disturbing what was the sheet flow coming south. And the school has a retention basin on the corner of the school. When you come into school on the left-hand side of the school, they have a retention basin that affects the properties inside Imperial Golf Estates because it floods out in that corner. Wayne: 21:53 Right. Well? IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page I I of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript Nick Walters: 21:55 So as far as corner goes... Nick Walters from Atwell. Wayne: 21:58 Why don't you come use the microphone, Nick? Nick Walters: 21:59 We're required... Might even be better over there, I'm not sure. So we'll be required to take on any offsite flows from the north to take on that sheet flow that you're talking about. We'll attenuate and treat it onsite and discharge at the allowable rate per state and federal requirements. Speaker 8: 22:17 Where will it go into the two lakes that you have? Or will it? Nick Walters: 22:20 Yes. And then we're, the site plan shows an expansion of the lakes. We're going to utilize the existing lakes as much as we can. But yes, it'll be on the onsite lakes. Wayne: 22:30 And then discharge offsite. Nick Walters: 22:31 And then discharging south offsite, yeah. Speaker 8: 22:34 It's not discharging further west, it's all going to discharge south? Or is it going to discharge west? Nick Walters: 22:41 Southwest would be what I'm saying. Speaker 8: 22:44 So out towards 41? Nick Walters: 22:46 I'm going to say more south, not towards 41. Speaker 6: 22:48 It's going to the golf course? Speaker 9: 22:48 Going down the golf course. Speaker 8: 22:48 It's going towards the golf course. Nick Walters: 22:49 It goes around the golf course through a conveyance well. Speaker 4: 22:54 Through what? Speaker 3: 22:56 Through a what? Speaker 4: 22:57 [inaudible 00:22:57]. Saying something already done. Wayne: 22:57 Yeah, it's already in place for this additional [inaudible 00:23:01]. Speaker 8: 23:00 So all that- IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 12 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript Speaker 6: 23:01 Speaker 8: 23:02 That whole area floods now. It floods now. Nick Walters: 23:04 There's an existing connection. Well, we're going to be able to maintain that sheet flow and have an allowable discharge. So we should slow that rate down because now we're going to add attenuation on site. Wayne: 23:16 If I can? Nick Walters: 23:17 Yep. Wayne: 23:18 One of the other things too, that you have to realize, the site as it exists is unimproved. But when we actually develop it, we have to put in additional water management facilities and more attenuation, which holds water back. 23:30 And then we have a discharge rate that's established by the county, which is a very low amount of discharge we can actually put off the site. That's why we're designing this to have more lake area plus additional dry detention areas to attenuate the flow of water. Yes, sir? Speaker 10: 23:46 Veterans Memorial, what are you planning to do? And I know these are site development plan, but what will be the? Will there be a right in, right out, light? What do you think is going to happen at the entrance? Wayne: 24:00 Honestly, I don't think we know yet whether we have a traffic signal there. There's no real opposing property across from us as the Conservation Collier Preserve. So there's no other development across from us, so I doubt very seriously we have a traffic signal. Speaker 8: 24:14 So you think it'll be just a median that you might be able to go this way because - Wayne: 24:18 1 would imagine we'll be able to make right and lefts out of there, at least for the foreseeable future. There's no other development along that corridor that could be developed unless Mediterra comes back in to add additional units, which I don't think is on the table. Yes, sir? Speaker 6: 24:33 Isn't Veterans Parkway going to cross Old 41? Wayne: 24:37 Yes, sir. It's designed to go all the way up to new 41. IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 13 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript Speaker 6: 24:39 Right now, Old 41 backs up way past the point where Veterans will cross Old 41. So what's the plan to fix that? Wayne: 24:49 1 don't know. I don't know what the county's plan is. Speaker 6: 24:51 Well, you're asking us to pay for this indirectly because we're the taxpayers. Wayne: 24:56 Right. And we pay impact fees for all the homes that get built and we pay a heavy traffic impact fee, which the county utilizes. Plus this is, I think, an already funded project for the county. So I don't know that you're going to see any direct cost related to that improvement. 25:13 But I think that very likely at some point there could be a signal at Old 41, New 41, but I don't know if that decision's been made yet. Anything else we haven't touched on? Again, I can put up the contact information. Speaker 10: 25:28 Can you go back to what you're proposing? Wayne: 25:30 Sure. Speaker 10: 25:34 So this you believe to be the optimum development pattern? Is it all the way, I mean, it's a narrow piece of land. It's 76 acres. But you don't see it being any... The reason why I'm pointing out is the residential is closest to the Castlewood. There's no way to design it so the preserve would be more in their area equaling... Don't you all have a preserve? Speaker 4: 26:06 Right, yeah. Wayne: 26:07 We typically don't design preserves to be the buffer because the preserves are meant to be native vegetation, preservation areas where the highest quality of vegetation exists. And in this case, that's wetland, and that's the highest priority for protection by Collier County. So if those are wetlands, we show those as preserves. Speaker 10: 26:26 And you have to have the lake dug out. Go back to what you're proposing. The full length, isn't that a lake, the whole? So it's a reconfiguring of the lake? Wayne: 26:37 Yes, we're connecting the two lakes that have been divided in the middle here. It's a much more efficient design to get filled for our own site out of that larger lake system, and it gives us more water management area to store water. IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 14 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript Speaker 10: 26:49 So the movement of the preserve to the north of that lake couldn't go down? You deemed that to be the best environmental area? Wayne: 26:58 1 didn't. But you can see here that we had preserve areas largely in three areas anyway. One to the east, one to the south, and one to the north. So our road system still maintains. This one was very inefficient. It didn't connect. But there, we've created a pathway around the part of that preserve. 27:19 Because it's all been, remember this was done 40 years ago, when this thing was created. So there's been a lot more ground truthing by Turrell, Hall & Associates. So we think our plan reflects the likely scenario of getting the actual permits we need to develop that plan. Speaker 5: 27:38 However, is this lake going to be used for recreational purposes? Wayne: 27:44 The lake will not be used for recreational purposes. Typically, for these water management district lakes, they're restricted for use to just water management. Occasionally there could be some limited use of them, but not motorized activities or anything like that, probably not even kayaking allowed. They tend to attract alligators, as you know, from your golf course. Yes, sir? Speaker 5: 28:06 What is your envisioned timeframe for this whole development? Wayne: 28:10 Well, probably won't start for a year from now. Realistically, that would be the earliest. But beyond that, it's really going to depend on the market and the market for bringing new homes to the market. Speaker 4: 28:23 Yes. Speaker 5: 28:28 You know, you're talking about some of the units being 50, 60 foot high. Is there any thought about putting single dwelling in the area, in the buffer zone there where it would be... We'd be seeing our homes rather than having 50, 60 foot buildings that looking down on us? Wayne: 28:55 Well, keep in mind, today it's approved for five story buildings, and that's what we carried forward, that same development standard in just a little bit different format, because the county doesn't use stories to define buildings any longer. IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 15 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript 29:07 But we don't have a breakdown of how many of these might be multifamily. There could be no multifamily. They could all be single family. But we made provisions - Speaker 4: 29:16 But before approval - Wayne: 29:17 Excuse me, ma'am. Only one at a time, please. That we won't know that until the developer decides what's best for the market when he decides to develop the property. Speaker 4: 29:25 But do we have a say in that by the time that happens? Wayne: 29:28 You can certainly express your opinions at the public hearings. Speaker 4: 29:35 Yeah, just told me how to do that. Wayne: 29:35 Do we have anyone on Zoom that has indicated they want to speak, Sharon? We have, I think, a few Zoom participants, so I don't want to disrespect them. Sharon Umpenhour: 29:43 Just going to tell them to raise their hand if they do. Wayne: 29:47 If anybody's on Zoom and would like to ask a question or make a comment, please unmute and go ahead. I don't see anybody un-muting. Speaker 10: 30:00 So, in the current ordinance, there's a setback and a rear, at one point it says one half the building height. So, if you were to put residential 50, 60, 70 feet, what would be your setback from the property line in the back? Wayne: 30:21 So, we established a development table. This is the modern way that we do it. So, you can follow, for instance, we have multifamily here. And what we made a provision from HUD boundary for the buildings to be 15 feet, which is the same as the buffer width. In reality, that's probably not going to be the case because we usually have a transition to the landscape buffer, but that's what we've established as our proposed minimum. Speaker 10: 30:49 So, let me understand, you would have 15 feet of the buffer. Wayne: 30:52 Yep. Speaker 10: 30:53 How far back from that, additional, would the building begin and go up to a height of 70 feet? Because remember, I realize you have the current, it's vested. But the people that live as IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 16 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript neighbors, while they may have a preserve, it's really that southern end that somehow... Because I can't imagine it being very close to the property line, not having some commitment or consideration to that setback. Just at that - Wayne: 31:32 1 understand your comment, but I mean, I'm just showing you what we've proposed today. And we'll be continuing to have dialogue with probably yourself and county staff on that. Speaker 7: 31:43 Could they possibly move that southern preserve to the right? Wayne: 31:47 1 don't think so. Speaker 7: 31:48 Bring the road around? Wayne: 31:49 The preserve reflects where the best quality vegetation exists today, so that's what we proposed through our environmental consultant. Speaker 7: 31:57 If they would move that over, it would give us a much deeper buffer. Wayne: 31:59 No, I understand what you're saying. Speaker 7: 32:02 It's still close but I think it would probably be pretty much the same. Wayne: 32:03 But we just can't move preserves. Preserves are where the vegetation exists today that should be protected, so that's why they're where they're shown. Speaker 10: 32:12 Can you compare the approved plan today with what you're seeking? Where those preserves are and where they are in what you're seeking? Can you look at the map and show us where the preserves are? That's what you want. Wayne: 32:29 This is our proposed plan. We have three distinct preserve areas, generally where they were previously located. Speaker 10: 32:35 And where were they in the old one? Wayne: 32:39 In the old one, they were one to the north, one to the east, and one to the south. Speaker 10: 32:43 So, it seems like they're about in the same location. Wayne: 32:45 Generally, yes. IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 17 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript Speaker 10: 32:46 So, you deem those to be the most environmentally sensitive? Wayne: 32:51 Yes. Speaker 10: 32:52 Or your - Wayne: 32:52 Our environmental consultant has, yes. Ma'am? Speaker 13: 32:52 Okay. I have a question about this. So, you're talking about these preserves that were based on something that happened 40 years ago. Is that what you're saying? Wayne: 33:10 No, ma'am. The ones shown on the original plan were. We've updated an environmental assessment for today that the county's reviewing, and it reflects that the areas we've shown on this plan are the highest quality vegetation. Speaker 13: 33:24 That's with you moving the lakes? So, when you've moved the lakes, that's where the preserve then is now because - Wayne: 33:32 No, if you'll notice the preserves are always one to the south, one to the north, and one to the west. Speaker 13: 33:36 1 see that. But that doesn't mean anything. Speaker 3: 33:41 Go back to the map of what it is today, the picture that you have. I don't know about the picture that you have. Speaker 7: 33:41 The aerial. Speaker 9: 33:52 Can we look at two pictures side by side? Wayne: 33:54 I cannot. I don't have that on the slide here. I'm not sure, sir, what you're asking me to show you. Sharon Umpenhour: 34:01 The aerial. Speaker 3: 34:02 The picture that you have of the type there, that one. That area that adjoins Castlewood Lake, I guess, I don't know if you can call that a preserve, but certainly it's a wooded area. Wayne: 34:14 Yeah, there's a lot of - Speaker 3: 34:15 What we're saying is if we could retain some of that, it'd make it more acceptable to us. IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 18 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript Wayne: 34:20 No, I understand your comment, and we can certainly look at that and talk to our consultant about that. Speaker 3: 34:24 We're trying to avoid 70-foot buildings and no buffer adjacent to us. Wayne: 34:31 Understood. Speaker 3: 34:31 If you can put the 70-foot building somewhere else and not looking directly at us - Speaker 4: 34:35 And not affect us. Wayne: 34:35 Hang on. One at a time. Speaker 4: 34:36 [inaudible 00:34:38]. Speaker 3: 34:38 ... then we would be more amenable to it. Speaker 4: 34:38 Right. Wayne: 34:41 Okay. Understood. Any other comments we haven't touched on the subject matter tonight? Speaker 8: 34:46 Just one, that lower right-hand corner where the Supreme Court is. The building that would be proposed to go on that yellow line opposed to that yellow line is 70 foot building. The parking for that building would be on which side? 35:01 The reason I'm asking the question is because of street light because we have that problem right now with the high school and the lighting from the high school. So, if the parking is, if the building is there, then the parking should be on the far side, not on the side closest to Supreme because otherwise they're going to be having a lighting problem. Wayne: 35:22 Okay. I don't think we know that tonight, but I appreciate your comments and we'll certainly note that. Speaker 7: 35:26 What are you going to do about the deer? Wayne: 35:30 Well, they're everywhere. Speaker 4: 35:34 They're running out of places to be. Wayne: 35:34 We understand. The county asks us to look at protected species and the whitetail deer or not. They've got a lot of preservation IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 19 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript area. They exist in your community. They exist in communities where Rich used to live, or Sharon lives today. So, I mean, they can coexist and we certainly accommodate them and they'll continue to utilize the site if they're using it today. Speaker 10: 35:58 What is five stories? What's the height of five stories? Wayne: 36:02 Could be 90 feet. I don't know. I could build 20 foot tall stories. Speaker 10: 36:08 What would the county approve? Any height? Wayne: 36:12 Yeah, any five story building could be approved here today. Speaker 10: 36:14 Hmm. Wayne: 36:15 Yeah. That's why they like us to express it in feet rather than stories. Speaker 6: 36:21 They won't call up 75 because that's the high rise code. If they go above 75, they have to do all these alternate things to the buildings to meet the high rise code. Wayne: 36:33 Anything else? You want me to go back to our contact info so you can get in touch with us if you have some other questions? We'll leave that up. Speaker 3: 36:46 Can we look forward to another meeting where perhaps you have implemented some of what we've suggested? Wayne: 36:51 We typically do one of these meetings that's required by the county and our next public meeting becomes the planning commission. If you all have a representative that you'd like to reach out to us, we'd be happy to start some dialogue, but we probably won't have another noticed meeting like this. Yes, ma'am? Speaker 9: 37:13 Okay. So, are you interested in being good neighbors to us? Wayne: 37:17 Absolutely. Speaker 9: 37:17 That's my big question. Wayne: 37:18 Sure. We always are. Speaker 9: 37:18 Okay. Wayne: 37:18 I'm happy to help you. IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 20 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript Speaker 9: 37:20 Then our concerns about keeping, if you're going to do... I don't think we would have any real problem with any single family that would be buffering our lake, which is our single family. I don't think we'd have a problem with that. But if you put up a 50-foot building and it blocks our sun. Wayne: 37:40 1 understand. Speaker 9: 37:41 And our access to nature. Speaker 3: 37:44 See, that's what Vm- Speaker 9: 37:45 That's what our problem is. Wayne: 37:46 1 understand your comments. Just keep in mind, if we weren't amending this plan, we could go build five -story buildings there today. Speaker 7: 37:52 That doesn't make it right. Wayne: 37:55 It may not be right, but that's what is legally allowed today. Rich Yovanovich: 37:58 We've been approved at five stories since 1982, which predated your project. So, I don't think it's fair to - Speaker 5: 38:08 So, what you're saying is you can do anything you want. Rich Yovanovich: 38:10 No, what I'm saying is we have the right to go five stories. And I'm responding to the gentleman with the glasses where he says, "We'll still fight you." Okay. But we're coming in with a proposed plan that could reduce the density and also put in single family. Speaker 9: 38:25 And I appreciate that. Rich Yovanovich: 38:26 And I told her, we hear your comments, we may not change anything, but we hear your comments. But I don't think you're saying, you're accusing my client of being a bad neighbor when my client was approved in 1982. Speaker 9: 38:43 Things have changed since 1982. Building codes have changed. Rich Yovanovich: 38:57 There have been a few things that have changed. Wayne: 38:57 Hang on, hang on. Please. Please, please, please. IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 21 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript Rich Yovanovich: 38:57 I'm just responding to the comment. I don't want to debate it. I just wanted to clarify that [inaudible 00:38:58]. Speaker 5: 38:57 That is why I'm asking - Wayne: 38:57 Sir, can you please be more respectful. Speaker 5: 38:57 1 am being respectful. Speaker 9: 38:57 Why can't we have a single family development closest to us and move the - Rich Yovanovich: 39:03 My client will evaluate your comments and he may choose not to make any changes. I just, we will talk that through with my client. Speaker 9: 39:15 1 did not accuse you of being a bad neighbor. Rich Yovanovich: 39:16 1 didn't say you did. I didn't say you did. Speaker 9: 39:19 1 would like you to take that into consideration. There's a high school that it doesn't matter if there's five -story buildings next to the high school. It's already. And there's another side that's the preserve that won't ever get built on. Is that a problem to have the five -story buildings on that side and to protect the neighborhoods of Imperial? 39:47 1 realize you're not Imperial, you're not part of our gated community. But we have a community there that has been there maybe after your planned unit development. But you put in a development that you had no way of even building on because you didn't have roads. You didn't have a road system. You didn't have. So if you had built it 40 years ago - Rich Yovanovich: 40:11 And that's when the county promised my client they would build the road. We gave the county the road right away, so we've been waiting for the county to provide the access they promised us. Speaker 9: 40:21 For 40 years? Rich Yovanovich: 40:23 40 years ago. Speaker 9: 40:24 Okay, I get that. Rich Yovanovich: 40:25 Okay. IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 22 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript Speaker 9: 40:25 But our development wouldn't have been put in the way it was put in had that been the case. Rich Yovanovich: 40:36 1 don't know that. [inaudible 00:40:37]. Speaker 9: 40:37 1 know we just didn't read it. Wayne: 40:41 Well, like Rich said, we'll certainly take all your comments under advisement and discuss with our client, but we can't make promises tonight that anything may change. Yes, ma'am. All the way in the back? Speaker 1S: 40:50 Are you at liberty to share who your client is? Wayne: 40:52 Yes, the client is listed on the first page. Speaker 1S: 40:54 Okay. I came in later, I apologize. Wayne: 40:59 It's NA Realty Trust, Inc. Going once? Speaker 10: 41:05 Somewhere in here, you have the list of housing types. Wayne: 41:10 Yep. Speaker 10: 41:11 Is it the next page? Wayne: 41:12 No, it's not too far away. So on the right side, this is where we've listed the types of units that we could build. Speaker 10: 41:23 Got it. At some point, earlier, several years ago, you guys may have come forward and were asking for senior housing. Wayne: 41:32 Correct. Speaker 10: 41:33 But that is not on the - Wayne: 41:35 That's not on the table. We're not pursuing that today. Speaker 10: 41:38 Okay. And then there's a term called Live Local. Is that anything? I know you don't have affordable, you're going down to 330. But could you qualify for? Wayne: 41:50 Let Rich clarify me if I'm wrong, but we're not zoned commercial, therefore we could not come in for Live Local. Speaker 10: 41:55 Okay. But the affordable housing, going back to that, because that's what the ad said. IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 23 of 24 Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment (PL20250006588) October 21, 2025 NIM Transcript Wayne: 41:59 Correct. Speaker 10: 42:01 Some reason as to why, I mean why you abandoned that? Wayne: 42:07 1 think our client just felt that it wasn't a fight he necessarily wanted and didn't really need. The density seemed to be adequate to just put in conventional housing. 42:23 Everybody ready to go home? Thanks everybody for coming out. Appreciate it. And like I said, grab Sharon's card or get in contact with us. And anybody from Imperial, if you've got a contact person you'd like us to reach out to. [inaudible 00:42:41]. Automated: 42:43 Recording stopped. IMPLSP Imperial Lakes Oct 21, 2025 NIM Page 24 of 24 LauraDeJohnVEN From: LauraDeJohnVEN Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2025 4:51 PM To: 'Jim Reichart' Cc: Craig Brown; Chris Hall; Louise Jarvis Subject: RE: RPUD PL20250006588 - Imperial Lakes (PUDA) Mr. Reichart, Thank you for your input. I'll include your email in the backup material for this item as it moves through the public hearing process at the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners. Laura From: Jim Reichart <jreichart@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2025 4:03 PM To: LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@collier.gov>; Craig Brown <Craig.Brown@collier.gov>; Chris Hall <Chris.HaII@collier.gov>; Louise Jarvis <Louise.Jarvis@collier.gov> Subject: RPUD PL20250006588 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. [•Y•]a:•�e�:1<•1����:��y,1:�11L21:»•r_1IW_NM►dI_VOIN110MU•1.1.11101I1_1IWA Dear Ms. DeJohn and Mr. Brown In this recent PUD modification and reference to your zoning review comment 14. 1 and all of Castlewood are very concerned about the proposed layout. 1.This brings their development much closer to Castlewood, the only residential neighborhood adjacent to their proposed development. We like the original Proposed PUD much better and its corresponding setbacks 2. It also appears that in the revised PUD Documents (18 RPUD Exhibits A-fv.pdf) They are attempting to revise all the setbacks in a table. These modifications are not welcomed by the Castlewood community. Please keep the setbacks per the original PUD. 3. Environmental Review Comment 2 Bear Activity The Bear Report is inaccurate as it is over two years old and does not account for the construction of the High School. In addition, there have been 3 Bear sightings in Castlewood in the last year. In Addition There is nothing in the wildlife report about cougars. There have been numerous reports on the golf course of cougar sightings along with sightings in Castlewood. Deviations 1. In the original PUD the distance from Castlewood had a 60ft access easement then a 50 ft set back from the road to the property line and then a 50" road ROW then a Building setback of 50 ft from the road. Or 310 ft from Castlewood property line. 2. There were 3 deviations requested a. Deviation 1 Relief from street system requirements of a 60 ROW to 50 ROW We do not recommend this deviation as it will have adverse effects on visibility from Castlewood. In an area with already difficult traffic flow. b. Deviation 2 Sidewalk, Bike Lane and Pathways Requirements Too many deviations have been given in the past and this has led to poorly planned areas and pedestrian transportation i. There are also requirements for sidewalks and bikeways for access to the high school C. Deviation 3 Preservation standards This needs to be enforced as the wild life continues to be forced into smaller and smaller areas. With the construction of the High School the wildlife has moved everywhere else. They need to have continuous preserves for migration. Thank you for taking this into consideration Jim Reichart 1766 Supreme Ct Naples, FL. 34110 312-339-4402 LauraDeJohnVEN From: LauraDeJohnVEN Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2025 3:56 PM To: Jim Reichart Cc: Chris Hall; Living Waters Canoe; Ron Anderson; Trevor Calhoun Subject: RE: The other morning at about 3:30am — Nextdoor Bear in the neighborhood (PL20250006588 - Imperial Lakes (PUDA)) Mr. Reichart, Security settings do not allow me to access the Nextdoor post you linked in your email. If you would like information or images to be included as public correspondence for the pending Imperial Lakes PUD Amendment, please send in the body of an email or as a still image. Thank you, Laura Laura DeJohn Planner, Sr. Development Review Office: (239)252-5587 Laura. DeJohn(a)collier.gov My email address has changed. Effective immediately, please update your contact list to use this new address: Laura. DeJohn(a-)collier.gov Z) Collier Count O�DOm -----Original Message ----- From: Jim Reichart <jeichart@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2025 11:21 AM To: Chris Hall <Chris.Hall@collier.gov>; LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@collier.gov>; Living Waters Canoe <paul@john738.com>; Ron Anderson <randrande63017@gmail.com>; Trevor Calhoun <whitehawk959@gmail.com> Subject: The other morning at about 3:30am — Nextdoor Bear in the neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Checkout this post on Nextdoor: https://nextdoor.com/p/cx9Hf7- P7KYL?utm_source=share&extras=NjkxOTA2NzM%3D&share platform=6&utm_campaign=1766506707362&share_ action_ id =19d3a9f0-15da-4439-a26d-e1 e1 a3c64dc6 Jim Reichart Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. LauraDeJohnVEN From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hi Laura and Ray, Please read below. Thank you. Ailyn Padron Management Analyst I Zoning Office:239-252-5187 2800 Horseshoe Dr. Naples, Florida 34104 Ailyn. Padron(a)-collier.gov Ailyn Padron Wednesday, February 18, 2026 2:31 PM LauraDeJohnVEN; Ray Bellows Michael Bosi FW: [Spam] Proposed development PL20250006588- Imperial Lakes (PUDA) My email address has changed. Effective immediately, please update your contact list to use this new address: Ailyn.Padron(cDcollier.gov From: Jim Reichart <jreichart@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2026 2:28 PM To: Chris Hall <Chris.Hal I@collier.gov>; Ailyn Padron <Ailyn.Padron@collier.gov>; Amy Patterson it Collier Count GE000 <Amy.Patterson @colIier.gov> Cc: Living Waters Canoe <paul@john738.com>; linhampton@aol.com; Ron Anderson <randrande63017@gmail.com>; Julie Ewing <eteam6@gmail.com>; Thomas and Norine Petruzelli <petruzelli@me.com>; LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colIier.gov>; bill@murlick.com; SMurlick02@gmail.com Subject: [Spam] Proposed development PL20250006588 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. FullSizeRender.heic 1 R Nn R Commissioner Hall and Ms.Patterson I recently received a letter about a revision to the Imperial Lakes PUD circa 1960.1 have difficulty how the applicant can request a revision to the PUD without providing a layout plan other than a generic layout that does not show what or where they plan to build. How could the county even entertain this proposal? The new proposed layout will adversely impact the only residential community that is adjacent to this proposed PUD revision. With the generic layout that was submitted with the revised PUD it will move their proposed development even closer to Castlewood at Imperial Golf. I look forward to hearing back from you. Thanks Jim Jim Reichart 1766 Supreme Ct Naples, FL. 34110 312-339-4402 I ` iijC{{iHap1F Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 4 (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s) NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED D. WAYNE ARNOLD WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPERNOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER(S) PL20250006588. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT D. Wayne Arnold, AICP for Pape -Dawson Consulting Engineers, LLC NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF LEE 3800 Via Del Rey STREET OR P.O. BOX Bonita Springs, Florida 34110 CITY, STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 10 day of February , 2026, by identifir.atien and who did not take an oath. ,s""vP"kb SHARON UMPENHOUR •.. •- •° MY COMMISSION # HH 742571 P" EXPIRES: December 4, 2029 My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Public Sharon Umpenhour Printed Name of Notary Public Rev. 3/4/2015 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IMPERIAL LAKES RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) AMENDMENT PETITION NUMBER: PL20250006588 CCPC: MARCH 5, 2026 - 9:00 A.M. BCC: APRIL 28, 2026 - 9:00 A.M. _ 'COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, 3RD FLOOR, NAPLES, FL 34112 LAURA DEJOHN: 239-252-5587 GY7ENSlON U)F VETERANS MEh9�NfALY LSUBJECTRPROPERTY IS LOCATED WESTOF iNE HIGH YSCHOOL, ON 7HE sou Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller - Crystal K. Kinzel Collier County, Florida 3315 Tamiami Trail East, Ste. 102 - Naples, FL 34112-5324 Phone: (239) 252-2646 Publication Confirmation COLLIER COUNTY STATE OF FLORIDA The attached copy of advertisement, 4/28/26 BCC- Imperial Lakes (PUDA) (PL20250006588) was published on the publicly accessible website https://notices.collierclerk.com as designated by Collier County, Florida on 04/08/2026. THIS IS NOT AN AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at 9:00 A.M. on April 28, 2026, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 200441, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ZONING DISTRICT AND SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY (ST) TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS IMPERIAL LAKES RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 430 MULTIFAMILY DWELLING UNITS OR AN ALTERNATIVE OF 313 DWELLING UNITS INCLUDING SINGLE FAMILY, TWO FAMILY, TOWNHOUSE AND MULTIFAMILY SUBJECT TO A TRIP CAP; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO.82-81. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD, NORTH OF IMPERIAL GOLF CLUB, WEST OF CASTLEWOOD AT IMPERIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, CONSISTING OF 78.28t ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL202500065881 �ti ti Sun Century- RD_� •r Project Location Veterans Me ---- BLX'D .o S� B L�' D ___ o � J CT NN- 1 Pass R D !Ro I DR ou�`� ss Duke DR Imperial GooP>i�� -Uc0rV- Course BLV tj f�eV WAY- -- �" Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted ten (10) minutes to speak on an item. Written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.collier.gov/Calendar-Events-directory after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.WilliQna collier.Qov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DAN KOWAL, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER