HEX Final Decision #2026-15Page 1 of 7
HEX NO. 2026-15
HEARING EXAMINER DECISION
DATE OF HEARING.
February 26, 2026
PETITION.
PETITION NO. BD PL20250005726 -1843 Gordon River Lane - Request for a 19-foot boat dock
extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of
the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways 100 feet or greater in width, to
allow a boat docking facility protruding a total of 39 feet into a waterway that is 114-120 feet wide,
pursuant to LDC Section 5.03.06.H. The subject property is located at 1843 Gordon River Lane
and is further described as Lot 7, Nature Pointe, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East,
Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commissioner District 4 (2026-
399)
GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION.
The petitioner requests that the Hearing Examiner approve a 19-foot boat dock extension from the
maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County
Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways 100 feet or greater in width, to allow a new boat
docking facility protruding a total of 39 feet into a waterway that is 114 - 120 feet wide, pursuant
to LDC Section 5.03.06.H.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
Approval with conditions.
FINDINGS.
1.The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87(4) of the
Collier County Code of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter
9 of the County Administrative Code.
2.The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all
County and state requirements.
3.The public hearing was conducted electronically and in-person in accordance with
Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04.
4.The public hearing was conducted in the following manner: the County Staff presented the
Petition followed by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner’s representative, public comment and then
rebuttal by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner’s representative. There were no objections received.
Page 2 of 7
5.The hearing examiner disclosed having reviewed the record associated with the petition and
having no ex parte communications.
6.In accordance with LDC Section 5.03.06.H., the Collier County Hearing Examiner shall
approve, approve with conditions, or deny a dock facility extension request based on certain
criteria. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve this request, at least four of the five
primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria must be met.1
Primary Criteria:
1.Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate
in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the
subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier
islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the
property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be
no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling
unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be
appropriate.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
is met. The subject property is located within the residential development area of a
Planned Unit Development (PUD). Section 2.03.B.1 specifically calls out private boat
docks as a permitted accessory use to single family dwellings; however, no
development criteria are provided, therefore, we default to the LDC. LDC Section
5.03.06.H.1.a states that the typical number of slips for single-family use should be no
more than two. The proposed docking facility consists of installing one boatlift to
accommodate a 30-foot LOA vessel and a second platform boatlift for 2 Personal
Watercraft (PWCs).
2.Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the
general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner’s application is
unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner’s application
and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching
and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
is met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The proposed docking facility is necessary due
to the existing on-site water depth conditions, which are unavoidable and will still
require additional maintenance dredging to ensure safe access to the proposed docking
facility. This particular property and associated riparian area have been directly
affected by natural shoaling within the subject waterway, creating a large shallow area
within the applicant’s riparian rights. Due to this, the proposed dock location is being
proposed to minimize the maintenance dredging activities required. The dock’s overall
1 The Hearing Examiner’s findings are italicized.
Page 3 of 7
protrusion has been maximized to extend out to the 25 percent width of waterway line
on the southern portion of the shoreline due to these existing on-site conditions.”
Zoning staff concurred.
3.Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation
within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not
intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic
in the channel.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
is met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The proposed docking facility design is
consistent with other docks along the subject and adjacent waterway, but would
protrude out slightly further than most. This additional protrusion is being proposed
due to the existing on-site conditions as outlined within Primary Criteria 2. As
proposed, the dock and boatlifts will not create new impacts on navigation within the
subject waterway, nor will it alter the existing ingress/egress to both adjacent
neighboring docks. The subject waterway is unmarked; therefore, the entire waterway
provides safe navigation between the docking facilities, existing natural shoals, and the
adjacent natural shoreline. It is our opinion, as proposed, that there are no new impacts
to existing navigation, as there are other more restrictive points all passing vessels
must navigate along the subject waterway south.” Zoning staff concurred.
4.Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the
width of the waterway and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway
width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The
facility should maintain the required percentages.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
is met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The waterway width is 154 feet, and the proposed
dock facility protrudes a total of 36 feet from MHWL, which is 23.38 percent of the
waterway width. Thus, the dock facility does not protrude more than 25% of the
waterway width and maintains more than 50% of navigable waterway width.” Staff
concurred.
5.Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the
facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should
not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
is met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The proposed docking facility design is
consistent with the existing docking facility and other neighboring docks on this
waterway. As proposed, the dock will be within the allowed buildable area by providing
the required setbacks, and therefore, as proposed, there will not be any new impacts
nor interference to either adjacent docking facility.” Zoning staff concurred.
Page 4 of 7
Secondary Criteria:
1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the
subject property or waterway, that justify the proposed dimensions and location
of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related
to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline
configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
is met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The subject property shoreline consists of a steep
rip-rap shoreline with a large natural caprock that extends out below/past the MHWL,
which then requires the dock to extend out past. Additionally, based on the waterway
width, maintaining the parallel dock/slip layout is the best option to remain within the
allowed 25% width of waterway and be consistent with the other docks along the
subject development shoreline.” Zoning staff concurred.
2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the
vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive
deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use
excessive deck area.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
is met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The design of the proposed boat dock is for
recreational vessels to be maintained safely without incident. No excessive deck area
is being proposed outside of the normal 20-foot limits, as shown in the site plan. A
small deck area for safely loading and storage of non-motorized crafts is proposed
within the regular limits on the west side.” Staff concurred.
3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel or vessels in
combination described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject
property’s linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage
should be maintained.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
is met. The subject property has 139 feet of water/canal frontage, and the proposed
dock facility has been designed to moor a single 30-foot vessel and two PWCs to be
moored side-by-side. Staff typically only counts one PWC when stored side by side,
therefore watercraft will occupy 55 feet (30’ + 25’) or 39.57 percent of said
waterfrontage.
4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view
of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on
the view of a neighboring property owner.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
is met. The applicant’s agent stated: “The existing on-site conditions consist of a dock
Page 5 of 7
with a boatlift, which are all proposed to be replaced upon approval. Additionally, as
proposed the dock has been designed to be constructed within the designated side yard
setbacks and is consistent with the other existing boat docks along the subject
waterway. Based off this and the fact that this is a boating community, it’s our opinion
that there are no new impacts to either adjacent property owners’ current view.”
Zoning staff concurred.
5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass
beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.J of the LDC must be
demonstrated.)
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
is met. There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring
properties within 200-feet of the existing dock structure.
6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection
requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance
with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that this criterion
is not applicable. The provisions of the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan do not
apply to single-family dock facilities except for those within the seawalled basin of Port
of the Islands; the subject property is not located within Port of the Islands.
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION.
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that Environmental Planning
Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. The property
is located adjacent to a man-made canal. The proposed docking facilities will be constructed
waterward of the existing seawalled shoreline. The shoreline does not contain native vegetation.
A submerged resources survey provided by the applicant found no submerged resources in the
area 200 feet beyond the proposed docking facility.
This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council Board (EAC) review, because
this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in
Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and
Ordinances.
ANALYSIS.
The Hearing Examiner concludes that there is enough competent, substantial evidence based on
the review of the record that includes the Petition, application, exhibits, the County’s staff report,
and comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or their representative(s), County staff and
anyone from the public, to approve the Petition for the boat dock. The boat dock petition meets
four of the five primary criteria and five of the six secondary criteria with one criterion found to
be not applicable. The criteria are set forth in Section 5.03.06.H of the Land Development Code.
Page 6 of 7
DECISION.
The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition Number BD-PL20250005726, filed by Jeff
Rogers of Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. representing the owner/applicant(s) Tim and Maria
Myers with respect to the property described as located at 1843 Gordon River Lane, further
described as Lot 7, Nature Pointe, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 20, Pages
20 through 23, inclusive, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, in Section 35, Township 49
South, Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida., for the following:
• To allow a 19-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet
allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for
waterways 100 feet or greater in width, to allow a new boat docking facility protruding a
total of 39 feet into a waterway that is 114 - 120 feet wide, pursuant to LDC Section
5.03.06.H. of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC).
Said changes are fully described in the Proposed Dock and Site Plan attached as Exhibit "A" and
the Boundary and Topographic Survey attached as Exhibit “B” and are subject to the condition(s)
set forth below.
ATTACHMENTS.
Exhibit A – Proposed Site and Dock Plan
Exhibit B – Map of Specific Purpose Survey
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
The subject property is located at 1843 Gordon River Lane, further described as Lot 7, Nature
Pointe, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 20, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive,
Public Records of Collier County, Florida, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East.
Collier County, Florida.
CONDITIONS.
1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the
development.
2. A Certificate of Completion for the proposed dock facility shall not be issued before a
Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the principal structure on the subject property.
DISCLAIMER.
Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any
way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency
and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant
fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or
undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.
Page 7 of 7
APPEALS.
This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done
in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES
AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR
VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE
NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
March 9, 2026
Date Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP
Hearing Examiner
EXHIBIT “A”
STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE: N 26.165247<> LONGITUDE: W -81.782646SITE ADDRESS:<> 1843 GORDON RIVER LN NAPLES, FL 34104Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24030.00 ignashkin - 1843 and 1817 gordon river ln\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24030-BDE-1843.dwg LOCATION MAP 2/10/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-27-2524030RMJ35251843 GORDON RIVER LNLOCATION MAP49RMJ---08-13-2502-10-26---JRJR---SHEETS 3-7SHEETS 3-4,10---01 OF 10NESWCOLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF AMERICA8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896KEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY
NESW0 100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24030.00 ignashkin - 1843 and 1817 gordon river ln\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24030-BDE-1843.dwg 1952 HISTORIC AERIAL 2/10/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-27-2524030-35251843 GORDON RIVER LN1952 HISTORIC AERIAL49-------------------02 OF 10SUBJECTPROPERTY
-5.1-0.70.30.60.30.3-3.0-1.0-2.0-1.0-2.0-0.3-0.3-0.5-3.3-1.0-1.0-1.0-3.7-1.7-0.4-1.3-1.70.1-0.20.2-0.2-0.20.20.50.30.30.30.50.60.70.90.30.30.70.90.90.70.30.3NESW0 102040SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,1843 GORDON RIVER LNNAPLES FL 34104·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"COURT GREGORY"04-26-24-1.70'+0.38'139'858114' - 120'RIPARIANLINE25% WIDTH OFWATERWAY LINERIPARIANLINEBRICK /RETAININGWALLMHWL = +0.38'NAVD88MLWL = -1.7'NAVD88EXISTINGRIPRAPEXISTINGDOCK TOREMAINTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24030.00 ignashkin - 1843 and 1817 gordon river ln\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24030-BDE-1843.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 2/10/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-27-2524030RMJ35251843 GORDON RIVER LNEXISTING CONDITIONS49RMJ---08-13-2502-10-26---JRJR---REVISED LABELSREVISED TABLE---03 OF 10EXISTINGSTAIRS TOREMAIN30'
19'
NESW0 102040SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,1843 GORDON RIVER LNNAPLES FL 34104RIPARIANLINE25% WIDTH OFWATERWAY LINERIPARIANLINEBRICK /RETAININGWALLMHWL = +0.38'NAVD88MLWL = -1.7'NAVD88EXISTINGRIPRAPRIPARIANSETBACKLINERIPARIANSETBACKLINE15'15'109'29'
39'30'18'30'12
'12'12'EXISTING STAIRSNEW FIXEDDOCKNEW BOATLIFTNEW BOATLIFT WITHNEW STAIRSDOWN TO 30"ABOVE MHWL(ELEV = 2.8'NAVD88)28'8'8'34'21'4'
2'Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24030.00 ignashkin - 1843 and 1817 gordon river ln\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24030-BDE-1843.dwg PROPOSED DOCKS -DIMENSIONS 2/10/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ07-16-2524030RMJ35251843 GORDON RIVER LNPROPOSED DOCKS -DIMENSIONS49RMJ---08-13-2502-10-26---JRJR---REVISED DOCKREVISED TABLE---04 OF 1067'30'·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE:"COURT GREGORY"04-26-24-1.70'+0.38'139'776114' - 120'76776739'
0.30.60.30.3-3.0-1.0-2.0-1.0-2.0-0.3-0.3-0.5-3.3-1.0-1.0-1.0-3.7-1.7-0.4-1.3-1.70.1-0.20.2-0.2-0.20.20.50.30.30.30.50.60.70.90.30.30.70.90.90.70.30.3NESW0 102040SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,1843 GORDON RIVER LNNAPLES FL 34104RIPARIANLINERIPARIANLINEMHWL = +0.38'NAVD88MLWL = -1.7'NAVD88EXISTINGRIPRAPEXISTINGDOCKRIPARIANSETBACKLINERIPARIANSETBACKLINENEW FIXEDDOCKNEW FIXEDDOCKAA06Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24030.00 ignashkin - 1843 and 1817 gordon river ln\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24030-BDE-1843.dwg PROPOSED DOCKS - DEPTHS 2/10/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-27-2524030RMJ35251843 GORDON RIVER LNPROPOSED DOCKS - DEPTHS49RMJ---08-13-2502-10-26---JRJR---REVISED DOCKREVISED TABLE---05 OF 10BB07BRICK /RETAININGWALL·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE:"COURT GREGORY"04-26-24-1.70'+0.38'139'776114' - 120'76776739'
12'4'18'20'0 2 510SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24030.00 ignashkin - 1843 and 1817 gordon river ln\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24030-BDE-1843.dwg CROSS SECTION AA 2/10/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-27-2524030RMJ35251843 GORDON RIVER LNCROSS SECTION AA49----08-13-25----JR----ADDED VESSEL----06 OF 10EXISTING DECKBOTTOM STAIRTO BE BURIEDEXISTINGRIPRAPEXISTINGUPLANDPATIONEW DECKEDOVER BOAT LIFTPROPOSEDDOCKMHW = +0.38' NAVD 88MLW = -1.70' NAVD 88PROPOSEDDOCKSTEMWALLALL PILES TO BEWRAPPED FROM 12"ABOVE MHWL TO 6"BELOW SUBSTRATEPROPERTYLINE39'30' TO MHWL
0 3 510SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24030.00 ignashkin - 1843 and 1817 gordon river ln\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24030-BDE-1843.dwg CROSS SECTION BB 2/10/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-27-2524030RMJ35251843 GORDON RIVER LNCROSS SECTION BB49----08-13-25----JR----ADDED VESSEL----07 OF 10EXISTINGRIPRAPEXISTINGUPLANDPATIOMHW = +0.38' NAVD 88MLW = -1.70' NAVD 88PROPOSEDDOCKEXISTINGSTAIRSPROPOSEDDOCK12' BOATLIFTALL PILES TO BEWRAPPED FROM 12"ABOVE MHWL TO 6"BELOW SUBSTRATESTEMWALL30' FROM MHWL
NESW0 75150300SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24030.00 ignashkin - 1843 and 1817 gordon river ln\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24030-BDE-1843.dwg ADJACENT DOCK 2/10/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-27-2524030-35251843 GORDON RIVER LNADJACENT DOCK49-------------------08 OF 10PROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPOSEDFIXED DOCKNOTE:THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATEAND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.PARCELS PROVIDED BY COLLIERCOUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER27'18'26'26'25'22'25'18'30'39'30'27'25'21'
-5.1-0.70.10.30.60.30.3-3.0-1.0-2.0-1.0-2.0-0.3-0.3-0.5-3.3-1.0-1.0-1.0-3.7-1.7-0.4-1.3-1.70.1-0.20.2-0.2-0.20.20.50.30.30.30.50.60.70.90.30.30.70.90.90.70.30.3NESW0 204080SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24030.00 ignashkin - 1843 and 1817 gordon river ln\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24030-BDE-1843.dwg SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 2/10/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-27-2524030-35251843 GORDON RIVER LNSUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY49-------------------09 OF 10PROPERTY BOUNDARY100'10'TYPICAL DIVE TRANSECTTRANSECT200'
G
O
R
D
O
N
R
I
V
E
R
L
N 120'PROPOSED DOCKS AND LIFTSNO SEAGRASSES WEREOBSERVED GROWING WITHIN 200FT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
-5.1-0.70.1NESW0 153060SCALE IN FEETPROPERTYBOUNDARYRIPARIANLINE25% WIDTH OFWATERWAY LINERIPARIANLINEEASEMENTBRICKMHWL = +0.38'NAVD88MLWL = -1.7'NAVD88EXISTINGRIPRAPEXISTINGDOCK114'
120'Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24030.00 ignashkin - 1843 and 1817 gordon river ln\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24030-BDE-1843.dwg WIDTH OF WATERWAY 2/10/2026THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-27-2524030-35251843 GORDON RIVER LNWIDTH OF WATERWAY49RMJ----02-10-26----JR----REVISED DIMENSIONS---10 OF 1039'22'
9'MHWL = +0.38'NAVD88NOTE:THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATEAND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.11'
9'
EXHIBIT “B”
05/05/2024Digitally signed by Court Gregory DN: cn=Court Gregory, o=Court Gregory Surveying Inc, ou, email=cgs6004@comcast.net, c=US Date: 2024.05.06 12:18:18 -04'00'
05/05/2024Digitally signed by Court Gregory DN: cn=Court Gregory, o=Court Gregory Surveying Inc, ou, email=cgs6004@comcast.net, c=US Date: 2024.05.06 12:18:52 -04'00'