Loading...
DSAC Agenda 01/07/2026• .,Co ierCount Growth Management Community Development Department Development Services Advisory Committee Meeting Wednesday, January 07, 2026 3:00 pm 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Growth Management Community Development Department Conference Room 609/610 Please contact Heather Cartwright-Yilmaz at (239) 252-8389 if you have any questions or wish to meet with staff. Collier County GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Development Services Advisory Committee Agenda Wednesday, January 07, 2026 3:00 pm 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Growth Management Community Development, Conference Rooms 609/610 NOTICE: Persons wishing to speak on any Agenda item will receive up to three (3) minutes unless the Chairman adjusts the time. Speakers are required to fill out a "Speaker Registration Form", list the topic they wish to address, and hand it to the Staff member before the meeting begins. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and speak into a microphone. State your name and affiliation before commenting. During the discussion, Committee Members may direct questions to the speaker. Please silence cell phones and digital devices. There may not be a break in this meeting. Please leave the room to conduct any personal business. All parties participating in the public meeting are to observe Roberts Rules of Order and wait to be recognized by the Chairman. Please speak one at a time and into the microphone so the Hearing Reporter can record all statements being made. 1. Call to order — Chairman 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Approval of Minutes: a. DSAC-LDR:11.19.2025 (Page: 04) 4. Annual Selection of Committee Chair and Vice Chair 5. Public Speakers For more information, please contact Heather Cartwright-Yilmaz at (239) 252-8389 or at Heather.Yilmaz@collier.gov Collier County GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6. Staff Announcements/Updates a. Zoning Division — [Mike Bosi] b. Community Planning & Resiliency Division — [Christopher Mason] c. Housing Policy & Economic Development Division — [Cormac Giblin] d. Development Review Division — [Jaime Cook] e. Operations & Regulatory Mgmt. Division — [Evelyn Trimino] f. Building Review & Permitting Division — [Building Division] g. Collier County Fire Review — [Michael Cruz, Captain] h. North Collier Fire Review — [Chief Sean Lintz or designee] i. Code Enforcement Division — [Thomas landimarino] j. Public Utilities Department — [Matt McLean or designee] k. Transportation Management Services Transportation Engineering Division — [Jay Ahmad or designee] 7. New Business 8. Old Business 9. Committee Member Comments 10. Adjourn FUTURE MEETING DATES: February 04, 2026 — 3:00 PM March 04, 2026 — 3:00 PM February 04, 2026 — 3:00 PM For more information, please contact Heather Cartwright-Yilmaz at (239) 252-8389 or at Heather.Yilmaz(@collier.Rov MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING Naples, Florida November 19, 2025 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Development Services Advisory Committee Meeting and Collier County, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 3:00 PM in REGULAR SESSION at the Growth Management Community Development Department Room 609/610 2800 N. Horseshoe DR. Naples, Florida with the following members present: Chairman: Clay Brooker Blair Foley - EXCUSED Jeff Curl Mark McLean - EXCUSED Robert Mulhere The following County Staff were in attendance: Michael Bosi, Director, Planning and Zoning, GMCD Jaime Cook, Director, Development Review, GMCD Michele Mosca, Planner III, GMCD Eric Johnson, LDC Planning Manager, GMCD Heather Cartwright-Yilmaz, Management Analyst/Liaison, GMCD 1 Any person who decides to appeal a decision of This Board you will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based, Neither Collier County nor This Board shall be responsible for providing this record. 1. CALL TO ORDER — Chairman Chairman- Clay Brooker Development Service Advisory Committee — Land Development Review Subcommittee, Wednesday, November 19, 2025 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Motion to approve- Jeff Curl Motion seconded- Robert Mulhere Motion passed unanimously 3. OLD BUSINESS a. PL20240006969 — Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) Overlay — LDCA Eric Johnson, LDC Planning Manager Three changes are being proposed for. LDC 02.03.07 Overlay, LDC 02.03.08 Rural Fringe Zoning, LDC 02.06.01 Generally. Summary of changes • Increase number of based TDR credits generated per Acre • Changing the calculation of TDR bonus credits • Addition of Conservation TDR credits • Addition of Belle Meade hydrologic enhancement overlay provisions • Changes to environmental restoration and maintenance TDR bonus credit generation • Introduction of business and industrial uses in the receiving lands with specific uses, development standards and locational criteria to be identified within the LDC • Revising the table of allowable uses for RFMUD receiving lands outside rural villages • Changes to rural village design standards and density bonus for low-income residential housing units • Addition of clustering provisions for RFMUD sending lands • Introduction of neighborhood commercial uses with affordable housing projects with specific uses, design and development standards and locational criteria to be identified within the LDC • Reduction of open space requirements for housing that is affordable projects • Allowance of active recreation in the sending lands as conditional uses • Additional development standards and locational criteria for housing that are affordable within the receiving lands Jeff Curl- On the density/open space for affordability. Has anyone ever thought about the parking lots and 10 contiguous spaces in the code to allow more parking and less landscape islands? If you increase density, you need more parking, we need to look at densifying the parking lots as well. Eric Johnson- With the increase in the number of units you will have an increase in parking spaces, so in case of that offer a less demanding landscape requirement associated with the number of parking spaces. Robert Mulhere- One way to achieve that is to specify that you could increase the number of spaces in a row without providing the landscape island, provided the same amount of landscape area is provided elsewhere within the site. Jeff Curl- Page 36- Ground cover. I don't understand why we need this. Jaime Cook- In Type D buffer along the roadway. Almost everyone plants sod, this requires you to plant something. Robert Mulhere- On page 36, the last sentence in item C states, shall be a minimum width of 3 feet and a maximum width of 5 ft and achieve 100% opacity, that can't achieve opacity, so that last sentence wouldn't apply to ground cover. Ground cover and opacity can't be related. Jaime Cook- I have no issue with the removal of it. Clay Brooker- On page 4- Section 2I, a, this applies to legal non -conforming lots or parcels of less than 5 acres, this section applies to conforming lots? Robert Mulhere- Yes, this is the TDR bonus credits and how you get them. Clay Brooker- On Page 5 it states, In the case of legal non -conforming lots or parcels less than 5 acres, now all the standards apply. On page 4a apply only to conforming to any size? I don't know why we are drawing a distinction. Eric Johnson- There is an issue that was discovered that required us to address legal non- conforming lots of less than 5 acres. The first section on page 4 would apply to everything else. Clay Brooker- Page 6, lines 8-11, This bonus TDR credit will only be applicable within 2 years of the effective date of adoption which is 5/23/2023, we are past that date. Robert Mulhere- We put a date there because we wanted to incentivize people to move forward with providing the easement we wanted them to go forward in the 2-year period. Eric Johnson- We can strike this line out and reinsert it once we decide to change the GMP, or we keep it in and ask Mike to move forward with a GMP amendment. Jaime Cook- Line 30 has the same date. Clay Brooker- If the GMP states this how do it, we can't state anything different. We can't do anything inconsistent with the GMP amendment. Mike Bosi- In the staff report we will ask the Board of County Commissioners to direct staff to modify the GMP to provide further opportunity and recommend no end date to it. Clay Brooker- Page 23, lines 36-39, states, any use not listed in table uses is prohibited unless the county manager/designee determines that it falls within the same class. What does that mean? Jeff Curl- Wouldn't it be better to say as outlined in section 106011 to reference the comparable use determination? Robert Mulhere- Should say, "Any use not listed in the Table of Uses is prohibited unless the County Manager designee determines that such use is comparable with other uses listed 3 in the table of uses, through the process as determined through the "Comparable Use Determination process." Eric Johnson- If we cite the Comparable Use Determination, that would require a Hex. Mike Bosi- I am much more comfortable with the comparable use process. It used to be staff that could make the determination but not any longer. That would be the more appropriate way. Robert Mulhere- I would rewrite this that any use that can be deemed comparable needs to go through the comparable use process. Eric Johnson- We will proceed in that manner. Eric Johnson- Page 37, This is where Bob asked for relief for landscape island parking. Robert Mulhere- Only for affordable housing projects, Mixed use and Non -Mixed use, allow for up to 15 parking spaces instead of 10 before a landscape island. Eric Johnson- The current requirement is 10 spaces; you want to increase it to 15, correct. Robert Mulhere- Except, that they would provide that additional landscape area elsewhere in the project. Clay Brooker- Page 34, Line 13, 100-foot-wide setback adjacent to a conservation area. In another area I saw 150 ft. Is that appropriate/inappropriate? Michelle Mosca- I have a note that RLSA requires 300 ft? Robert Mulhere- The problem is the term Conservation. It shouldn't apply to an internal preserve for which you may be placing a conservation easement over, but if your building is adjacent to the Picayune Strand then ok. I understand having an enhanced setback, but 100 ft is a lot, and this is affordable housing. Mike Bosi- That is quite a demand on housing that is affordable, it drives up the price of land because you have to part with so much acreage. Robert Mulhere- We need to say, "external boundaries." Jaime Cook- I would agree with that. Robert Mulhere- It would need to say, "an external boundary adjacent to public conservation area." Clay Brooker- You know our thoughts on it, come up with a recommendation and bring it back to the next DSAC meeting. Page 39, Line 39, same concern. States 150 feet here. Clay Brooker- Page 52, Lines 45-49, An additional density bonus of 1 unit for each 1 unit that is provided for low-income residents as identified in the affordable housing section. Is Low income defined, is it different than housing that is affordable. Michelle Mosca- Is that in the table in 2.06.03, the category low income. That language is in the Future Land Use Element. It was a 1 for 1, it was to encourage additional housing. Clay Brooker- I would ask staff to look at "low-income residents" to make sure it is a correct characterization in the affordable housing section of the code. Eric Johnson- We have it defined in our definition section. With Robert leaving we are losing the quorum to vote on this. Can we vote to bring this back to the next meeting? Clay Brooker- We don't need to bring it back; we can just continue it to the next meeting on December 161n 4. NEW BUSINESS None 5. PUBLIC SPEAKERS 4 No public speakers 6. REMINDERS OF UPCOMING DSAC-LDR SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING DATES DISCUSSION: a. Tuesday, December 16, 2025 7. MEETING ADJOURNED There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the order of the chairman at 4:10 p.m. COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE Clay BrookeolrChairman These minutes were approved by the Committee/Chairman on (check one) as submitted X or as amended Building Plan Review Statistics All Permits Applied by Month 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 .� ,• 2,000 • 1,000 M V Ict V I-* V V V V Ict V V IV 0 Ln 0 0 0 In 0 In 0 0 0 LLB N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ci C M L L >, C 0 a r > U C L i >' C a1 a > U N M Q M a M =3 N V O <C d O a O 3' N 7 V O d ' d 0 n u_ 2 4 2 n 4 0 0 Z 0 n u_ 2 4 2 n 4 0 0 Z 0 Top 15 of 35 Building Permit Types Applied Gas, 178 oof, 200 Plumbing, 281 Pool, 89R , _�--r---_� rs/Windows Only, 245 Well Permits, 106 Mechanical, 581 Shutters/Storm Protection/Screening Building, 516 Systems, 74 Electrical, 295 Aluminum Structure, 147 Fence,134 Demolition, 54 ROW Commercial, 68 ROW Residential, 74 Building Plan Review Statistics Monthly 1 & 2 Family Total Construction Value by Applied Date $450,000,000 $400,000,000 $350,000,000 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 I'* N N N LO LO LO LO N N N N N U i C Q U L C Q U +1&2 Family Monthly Total Construction Value by Applied Date $450,000,000 $400,000,000 $350,000,000 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 $- Monthly Multi -family & Commercial Total Construction Value by Applied Date $450,000,000 $400,000,000 $350,000,000 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 N N N N N N N N N U L C Q U L C Q U M (n 0 � M cA � -a-MURi-family Commercial M V �* It 'IT It Itt V 7 V V V V LO V) M M LO Ln V) U') Ln U') LO LO N N N N N NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN U C 4 Q T C C) Q U > U C Q Q T C Q U > U m m � � o � m CO � � m o 0) o � LL2 Q 2 n Q U) O Z o n LL2 Q g n Q cn O Z o �1 &2 Family f Multi -family Commercial Building Plan Review Statistics 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 New Construction Building Permits Issued by Month M * 14 le Iq 11 NT 1* q* It LO M M LO M M LO M M In In M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U C -0 L L A C 0) Q. *1 > V C -0 L L >% i Is 0) Q. *1 > 0 0 -)LL 2 Q M 7 Q fn O Z O 7 LL 2 Q M " Q fn 0 Z a Dec- 23 Jan- 24 Feb- 24 Mar- 24 Apr- 24 May- 24 Jun- 24 Jul- 24 Aug- 24 Sep- 24 Oct- 24 Nov- 24 Dec- 24 Jan- 25 Feb- 25 Mar- 25 Apr- 25 May- 25 Jun- 25 Jul- 25 Aug- 25 Sep- 25 Oct- 25 Nov- 25 Dec- 25 ■ Commercial 2 3 4 4 5 8 4 6 6 4 9 7 4 3 5 6 5 4 8 3 7 4 7 5 8 ■ Multi -family 5 3 11 3 4 4 2 4 1 1 10 2 2 5 0 2 1 6 13 1 6 5 9 2 4 0 1&2Family 183 185 252 174 191 267 188 197 163 132 184 134 181 218 187 158 140 162 178 140 176 138 125 84 145 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 New Multi -family Building Permits Issued by Month MIt It'zi- � u7 u7 LO M u7 LO N N N N N N N N N N N N N U Q C U U Q C U7 U U 0 LL Q � 0 � m Q � 0 Q 0 LL Q (� New Commercial Building Permits Issued by Month 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 MIJ 0 M LO Ln M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N U Q L C U) t U Q L C U) t U p LL Q-5 0 0Q-5 0 a) Q 0 LL Q 0 Building Inspections Statistics 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Well, 115 Building Inspections M 't 't Itt � Itt Itt 't LO U') LO LO LO U') LO U') Ln Lfj Ln U') N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a% C� -6 L " %1 C -15 � Q a"� i U N is f9 7 U O 0 m N m 0-M 7 -, 7 V O 0 0 LL_ Q g Q U)O Z 0 -, LL 2 Q :E -, Q (n O Z 0 Types of Building Inspections Gas, 547 Pollution Control, 0 ROW, 321 Building Inspections Statistics 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Milestones Received by Month M Qft '� -am oft _ d Z' `m m `m `m w d rn a E -0 LL O m CO 2 O 2025 Milestone Inspection Status Completed, 520 Delinquent, 11 Ph2 Required, 0 MI Phase Permit, 15 Land Development Services Statistics 300 250 200 150 100 50 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 All Land Development Applications Applied by Month N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 C .0 L L >, C 0 Q. ++ ' 0 C .0 L L >, C 0 Q �� i 0 d R d �- fC 7 ' 3 G> V 0 N M N W M f0 7 3 0)V 0 d o-) uL a a Cn o z o� LL 2 a a US o z o Top 5 Land Development Applications Applied within 40 the Last 6 Months R 21 16 Commercial Boat Zoning Verification Short -Term Vacation Site Development Plan Code Payoff Request Launch Permit Letter Rental Registration Insubstantial Change Land Development Services Statistics 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 120 100 80 60 40 20 Pre -application Meetings by Month N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N <: C M L L >, C 07 a — > 0 C -0 L L >, C CO Q. t+ > 0 a n w M Q f° ' 3 0 z a-) LL M Q �° n d 0 O a� Front Zoning Counter Permits Applied by Month N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V C M L i >, C 0 Q — > V C M L L >, C ' tm Q — > U N M 0 to a M O 7 N V O 0 M 0 O Q- to 73 d V O d G M LL �2 Q M Q 0 O z a M LL 22 Q 2 M Q fn O z 0 0 Temporary Use Commercial Certificates Land Development Services Statistics 0 7 c 6 0 > 5 3 '^ 4 0 L 3 E 0 z 2 1 C 35 30 0 25 c� a 0 20 m 5 15 II 10 5 0 Number of New Subdivisions Recorded per Month M le 14 le leI-* le le le I* le le le W 0 0 0 LC> 0 0 0 M LO W W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 C.0 L L >, C ' M O. —> 0 C M L L >, C ' O. �' > 0 0)R 0) f6 Q W 7Q 7 O 0 o 0 R 0 0 W 77 O V O d o n LL M Q g n Q 0 0 z o n LL M Q g Q cn 0 z o 35 Plat Pages Recorded per Month 33 29 19 19 18 13 12 7 7 8 5 4 4 4 0 0I�0 1 1 M le't le V le Iq Iq le V V W) W) W) U) W) W) LO LO LO LO LO M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 c L L �, C Q > V C > U d Md O O. cc 3' 3 d v O d ns N O O- Id 3 d v O d o-) LL Q 2 Q fn 0 z o n LL Q n nQ y 0 z 0 Yearly Totals Subdivisions 2020 — 25 2021— 33 2022 — 29 2023 — 21 2024 —18 2025 — 27 Yearly Totals Lots 2021— 1353 2022 — 3100 2023 — 1212 2024 — 1559 2025 — 2324 Yearly Totals Pages 2020 — 152 2021— 188 2022 — 175 2023 —100 2024 — 154 2025 —168 Land Development Services Statistics 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Monthly Total of Subdivision Applications (PSPA, PSP, PPL, PPLA, ICP, FP, CNST) by Month M * Iq 1 1* qe qe le Iq qe q* qI qe 0 LO 0 0 0 0 0 LO 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V C .0 L L >, C a) a - i V C .0 C a9 a - i V 4)M a)fC 3 3 d V O 0 M d f4 a f0 3 � 3 d V 0 d O n, LL Q Q fn o Z o n LL Q � Q to o Z in Monthly Total of Subdivision Re-submittals/Corrections (PSPA, PSP, PPL, PPLA, ICP, FP, CNST) by Month N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 C .0 L L. >, C M a — i 0 C -0 L i >, C M a — i U 0 n Li 2 Q f° 3 3 aD 0 z o n Li 2 Q m 3� 3 a' 0 z 0 Land Development Services Statistics Monthly Total of Site Plan Applications (SIP, SIPI, SDP, SDPA, SDPI, NAP) by Month 60 50 40 30 20 - •• — 10 M NT V Iq '* Iq IV q* Iq NT NT qe qq U') Ln Ln W) Ln U.) LO Ln LO N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LO N Ln LO N N M (D 0 Q f6 7 ' 7 0 V 0 0 M 0 fa 7 ' 7 ( ❑ LL E a E a W o z❑�LL a a N v o > � 0 d z❑ Monthly Total of Site Plan Re-submittals/Corrections (SIP, SIPI, SDP, SDPA, SDPI, NAP) by Month 60 50 40 30 •• 20 10 0 M Iq ICT NT q1 q* NT q* ICT qe q* q* It LO K) W) L LO LO LO LO N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LO N LO LO N N U C -0 L L >% C 0) Q. "' i V C -0 L L >, C 0 0.*1 d fC 0 fa 7 ' d V 0 a)fC 0 fa Q- fQ d ❑ LL a a 0 z❑ LL 2 a 2 a cn V 0 i U 0 d z❑ 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 Reviews for Land Development Services Number of Land Development Reviews N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N > U C L L >+ C 0) Q > U 0 c0 G> =- M 3 7 d V O d R O la R = 3 G> V O d 0 nLL Q M Q 0 0 z o n LL 2 Q 2� Q cn 0 z o Percent Ontime for the Month Late, 6.1 % Top 5 Land Development Reviews 400 378 350 300 250 200 150 137 106 89 77 100 LA 50 0 A P Land Development Services Statistics Total Applied Construction Valuation Estimate $40,000,000 $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V C ME M Q +' > V C M L L >% C LA Q > U 0 f6 0> O O- fC 7 � 3 0 V O d M 0 O O M 3 � 3 0)V O d O M LL 2 Q 2 Q d) 0 Z O M LL 2 Q 2 7 Q y 0 Z O ■ Construction Estimate Utility Estimate Site & Utility Inspections 70 60 I 50 0 I J I E 40 I I U" 30 0 a� 20 a 10 0 M le le l I le le le It 49 In W Ln W) In Ln w 0 0 w 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N d R N O- M 3 O 7 41 V O M w d O Q M 7 O 3 G> V O d M LL Q 7 M Q to 0 Z O -)LL 2 Q E n' Q fn O Z 0 ■ Final Subdivision Inspection ■ Final Utility Inspection Preliminary Subdivision Inspection Tie In Inspection Fire Review Statistics 10 9 8 7 6 m 5 0 4 3 2 1 0 Building Fire Review Average Number of Days rn R* IZT 'IT 'IT Rt Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ill Ln Ln Ln Ln N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U C -0 L c bn a > U C -0 i L c bn a > U 41 M 61 M Q r6 7 7 (U U O a) M 4J M CL r6 7 7 U1 U O 4J o, LL 2 a s Ln O z o, LL g a s Ln o z o Total Number of Building Fire Reviews by Month Fire District Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- 23 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 0 North Collier 411 459 406 508 581 684 634 647 646 733 655 459 481 588 491 621 818 820 771 750 613 755 621 351 434 Collier County (Greater Naples) 403 382 429 425 552 517 511 482 407 464 447 390 432 459 436 484 622 537 547 431 408 549 513 308 467 Planning Fire Review Average Number of Days 10 9 8 7 6 c�a 5 0 4 3 2 1 0 rn N N Kt N N N � I;j- I;j- I* �t Kt Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Ln N Ln Ln Ln N N N b C N r6 -0 N fl- i` C bo Q +� > U C -0 L % C bn M 7 = N U O N M W r0 7 = Q a)U +� > U O a) 0 � LL � Q 75; � Q (n O z C) — L.L Q Q Ln O z � Total Number of Planning Fire Reviews by Month Fire District Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- 23 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 ■ North Collier 57 60 57 37 44 40 43 51 51 62 63 47 46 55 65 47 49 79 48 60 44 59 65 48 45 Collier County(Greater Naples) 39 56 53 60 75 61 55 68 67 64 48 64 58 44 95 75 58 116 87 49 70 61 59 51 52 A Collier County December 2025 Code Enforcement .�to,�thcy Stattsctcs 12/2025 Growth Management Community Development Department Code Enforcement Reports Cases Opened Per Month 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 - 100 0 N M N LL N N a N N N 7 N Code Inspections Per Month 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 V � O N - N U N E N a N 2 N C ,n LO 7 N N aN C N Q N Z N Q N 0 N U) �Ln O N >LO O N Z Code Enforcement Reports 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Origin of Case ■ Code Investigator initiated cases by FY Complaint initiated Cases by FY 2024 2025 CRA Case Opened Monthly ■ Monthly Case Opened ■ Total Cases Opened Bayshore Immokalee Code Enforcement Reports November 22, 2025 — December 12, 2025 Highlights ?s opened: • cases closed due to voluntary compliance: • Property inspections: • Lien searches requested: Top 15 Code Cases by Category Animal Control, 202 Nuisance Abatement, 37 Parking Enforcement, 12 466 125 1602 428 Property Right of Way, 13 Maintenance, 37 Signs, 3 Noise, 17 Site Development, 44 Vehicles, 15 Permit Fees, 14 , Vegetation Requirements, 4 Land Use, 29 VShort-term Vacation Rental, 8 Animals, 8 Accessory Use,16 Response Time - FDEP Permits 40 35 30 25 0 v 20 c Ln CO 15 10 5 0 I■ )1 Jun-25 Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25 Oct-25 Requests Completed Initial Review Time � Revision Review Time � Director Approval Time Requests Received Nov-25 - 40 - 35 - 30 WIV - 20 a v 'Mid.". - 10 - 5 - 0 Response Time - Letters of Availability c CO 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 M 20 15 10 cr av .5 w Jun-25 Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25 Oct-25 Nov-25 � Requests Completed � Minimum ■ Average � Maximum --*—Requests Received Attendance Roster — Date: January 07, 2026 Development Services Advisory Committee **Must have (8) members for a quorum** Committee Members James Boughton: Norman ntry: Clay Brooker: M rk McLean: Jeffrey Curl: Chri Mitchell: Laura Spurgeon DeJohn: obert Mulhere: Excused Nicholas Kouloh as: � Jeremy Sterk: k-v�- John English: Excused Mario Valle: Marco Es n William Varian Blair F I . Hannah Roberts: Excused Attendance Roster — Date: January 07, 2026 Development Services Advisory Committee Staff Members James French Department Head, GMCDD Michael Bosi Director, Planning & Zoning Christopher Mason Director, Community Planning & Resiliency Cormac Giblin Director, Housing Policy and Economic Development Jaime Cook Director, Development Review M&rekae' SMk Evtly r7 Trir'ri n0 Director, Operation & Regulatory Support John McCormick J Director, Building Review & Permitting Thomas landirmarino Director, Code Enforcement Matt McLean or designee Director, Public Utilities Jay Ahmad, Director or designee *-**-M-attX-hefts-&, Manager, Transportation Engineering Diane Lynch, Management Analyst II Staff Liaison, Operations & Regulatory Management Heather Cartwright-Yilmaz, Management Analyst Staff Liaison, Operations & Regulatory Management Present Present Excused Present Present Jh Present Angela Galiano Not Present Present Other County Staff Presenting NOT listed above. Name Signature Attendance Roster— Date: January 07, 2026 Development Services Advisory Committee Public Sign -in Sheet Please Print NAME REPRESENTING PHONE NO. 11 ,, 1U t�"c�rh�t.� I"�ac,bci (.wl C.o•. v�lU�(o'l� —�� T Collier County Government Communications, Government & Public Affairs 3299 Tamiami Trail E., Suite 102 Naples, Florida 34112-5746 December 11, 2025 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Notice of Public Meeting Development Services Advisory Committee Collier County, Florida January 07, 2026 3:00 p.m. �ORlDA� Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Development Services Advisory Committee will meet on Wednesday, January 07, 2026, at 3:00 p.m. in Conference Room 609/610 of the Growth Management Community Development Department building, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida. Individuals who would like to participate in person must complete and submit a speaker form prior to the beginning of the discussion about the item. About the public meeting: Two or more members of the Board of County Commissioners may be present and may participate at the meeting. The subject matter of this meeting may be an item for discussion and action at a future Board of County Commissioners meeting. All interested parties are invited to attend and to register to speak. All registered public speakers will be limited to three minutes unless changed by the chairman. Collier County Ordinance No. 2004-05 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners, an advisory board or quasi-judicial board), register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. Anyone who requires an auxiliary aid or service for effective communication, or other reasonable accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding, should contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail E., Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112, or (239) 252- 8380 as soon as possible, but no later than 48 hours before the scheduled event. Such reasonable accommodations will be provided at no cost to the individual. For more information, call Heather Cartwright-Yilmaz at (239) 252-8389. E' UM