Loading...
PBSD MSTBU Agenda 11/12/2025PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION Municipal Services Taxing &Benefit Unit NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2025 THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD WILL MEET AT 1:30 PM ON NOVEMBER 12 AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER AT PELICAN BAY, 8960 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34108. AGENDA 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda approval 4. Approval of 10/8/25 Regular Session meeting minutes 5. Audience comments 6. Administrator's Report a. Update on projects b. Review of the Oct. 31 financials 7. Nomination to PBF Government Affairs Committee 8. Chairman's Report a. Clam Bay Committee 9. Old Business 10. New Business/Miscellaneous Correspondence 11. Adjournment *indicates possible action items ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK ON AN AGENDA ITEM WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER ITEM TO ADDRESS THE BOARD. THE BOARD WILL SOLICIT PUBLIC COMMENTS ON SUBJECTS NOT ON THIS AGENDA AND ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES. THE BOARD ENCOURAGES YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS IN WRITING IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD IS MADE, WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS AN ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING YOU ARE ENTITLED TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION AT (239) 252-1355. 11 /4/2025 3:00 PM PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD REGULAR SESSION OCTOBER 8, 2025 The Pelican Bay Services Division Board met on Wednesday, October 8, 2025, at 1:30 p.m. at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples, Florida 34108. In attendance were: Pelican Bay Services Division Board Michael Fogg, Chairman Joe Chicurel, Vice -Chairman Jacob Damouni (absent) Nick Fabregas Peter Griffith Brad Hildebrandt Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Neil Dorrill, Administrator Dawn Brewer, Ops. Support Spec. II Chad Coleman, Deputy Director Darren Duprey, Supervisor — Field I Also Present Carol Hartman, Pelican Bay Foundation Bob Lufkin (by telephone) Cindy Polke Michael Rodburg Greg Stone (absent) Rick Swider Michael Weir Dave Greenfield, Supervisor -Field II Karin Herrmann, Project Manager I Lisa Jacob, Project Manager II Barbara Shea, Admin. Support Spec. II APPROVED AGENDA (AS PRESENTED) 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda approval 4. Approval of 6/11/25 Regular Session meeting minutes 5. Audience comments 6. Administrator's Report a. Update on projects b. Review of the Sept. 30 financials 7. PBF Government Affairs Committee Committee Reports a. Landscape &Safety i. *Approval of a pilot project to replace crosswalks at one intersection bI Water Management 9. Chairman's Report a. Clam Bay update 10. Old Business 11. New Business/Miscellaneous Correspondence 12. Adjournment ROLL CALL Mr. Damouni and Mr. Stone were absent, Mr. Luflcin participated by phone, and a quorum was established. Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session October 8, 2025 Mr. Fogg motioned, Mr. Rodburg seconded to allow Mr. Lufkin to appear by hone due to extraordinary circumstances. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Griffith motioned, Mr. Fogg seconded to approve the agenda as presented. The motion carried unanimouslv. Mr. Griffith motioned, Mr. Fabregas seconded to approve the 6/11/25 regular session meetinu minutes as aresented. The motion carried unanimously. AUDIENCE COMMENTS None ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT UPDATE ON PROJECTS OPERATIONS BUILDING PROJECT Mr. Dorrill provided a recent photo and update of our Operations Building construction project including (1) the project is at substantial completion including site work and improvements, (2) a new entry road was installed which was cost shared with the Collier County Utilities Dept., and (3) a certificate of occupancy is expected in the very near future. Mr. Coleman commented that we are waiting on a few additional approvals including fire marshal and FDEP approvals. Mr. Dorrill commented that the board will be invited to the dedication of the new building. SIDEWALK PROJECT Mr. Dorrill reported that our sidewalk improvement project is now complete, which is a great new amenity to the community. He commented that last month our sidewalks passed the required County D.O.T. inspections, and therefore the one-year warranty period began at the time of that approval. Mr. Dorrill reported that final invoice reconciliation for the project is underway. He noted that we may do a "demo" with a vendor in consideration of purchasing a riding pressure washer to be used for staff to clean our new sidewalks. CLAM PASS/SAND RECLAMATION WORK Mr. DorTill provided a recent video of the coastline from Wiggins Pass to Clam Pass Park, exhibiting outstanding conditions in general. He commented on some areas of mangrove die -off in the Bay Colony area, which are now showing some improvement. Mr. Dorrill commented that maintenance will be performed in die -off areas within Clam Pass Park and we will also be permitting new hand -dug channels in this area to improve tidal flushing which will improve mangrove health. He reported that our Clam Pass dredge project is scheduled to begin in about a month, for which we have received TDC funding approval. Mr. Dorrill reported that last week, one of our sand reclamation projects began, starting with the reclamation of sand behind the Brighton to be used to reconstruct the dune in this area. This work will be followed by the County's beach renourishment project in late fall/early winter. Ms. Jacob Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session October 8, 2025 commented that she expects this project to last 34 months. Mr. Dorrill commented that a second sand reclamation project in and around Clam Pass Park will commence later this fall. Ms. Polke questioned how the six -feet high sand pile behind South Beach will be addressed. Mr. Dorrill responded that this sand will be excavated and used to reconstruct the dune in this area. He noted that per our permit, sand dredged from Clam Pass will first be used to fill the template on the south side of the Pass (historically about 60%), and then the remainder will be deposited in the template on the north side of the Pass. Ms. Pollee questioned how the sand will be removed out of the canals within the Clam Bay system. Mr. Dorrill commented that there is an area just south of "Section C" where some dredging is planned. He noted that we have never removed sand out of the areas north of Clam Pass as our existing permits do not allow this. Mr. Dorrill commented that he will follow up with Dr. Dabees (Engineer with Hurniston & Moore) on this issue. Ms. Police commented on her sighting of a speedboat entering Clam Pass last weekend. Mr. Dorrill noted that this is not unusual and that this may have been possible as a result of extraordinary high tides and related higher water levels, caused by the harvest moon. Ms. Polke commented on the sand piled up at the first bridge east of Clam Pass, which is restricting water flow and causing the reduction of wildlife. Mr. Dorrill commented that there is a correlation between dredging events and a subsequent increase in wildlife. He noted that the sand discussed by Ms. Polke is part of our sand reclamation project and will be used to reconstruct the dune in this area. Mr. Dorrill commented that staff has observed that there is very little debris in the sand which was overwashed into mangrove areas, and therefore, our reclamation efforts will not be hindered. He noted that in some areas the sand is eight feet deep. Mr. Dorrill reported that we are planning to do further work to eliminate the ancient mangrove roots, located just offshore. BAY COLONY DUNE SWALE Mr. Dorrill commented on the Bay Colony dune Swale which is the main drainage facility and outfall for all of the buildings along the Bay Colony beach. He noted that the PBSD has been working with the Contessa and the master HOA for some time to complete the dune swale further south and running back towards the east. Mr. Dorrill noted that these areas were never developed in accordance with the original master plan of Bay Colony and as a result, the conservation area that is just south of the Contessa has experienced a substantial mangrove die -off. Several months ago, PBSD staff met with the Contessa and Bay Colony management staff during which Mr. Dorrill suggested that if Bay Colony/Contessa were willing to convey drainage easements (to the PBSD), that currently do not exist, and undertake certain improvements to that system (to increase flow), then the PBSD would maintain those in perpetuity. Mr. Dorrill commented that this will require a recommendation from the PBSD Board, approval by the BCC, and further engineering and construction by Bay Colony/Contessa. Subsequent to all of these actions, the PBSD would assume the maintenance obligation of these drainage areas. Mr. Dorrill commented that draft easements and an executive summary are under review by the respective attorneys. PINE CREST Mr. Dorrill reported that a lake bank restoration project has been completed at Pine Crest Lake 2-3, to address erosion and escarpment. Work included re -grading and the addition of rip rap and fill. He noted that the project was completed on time and under budget. REVIEW OF THE SEPTEMBER 30 FINANCIALS c Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session October 8, 2025 Mr. Dorrill reviewed the September 30 financial statements and discussed highlights including (1) $5.922 million in cash, (2) $1.391 million in outstanding payables, and (3) $5.187 million in total assessments received. He noted that overall, at year end, total expenditures came in within budget. PBF GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS COMMITTEE Ms. Carol Hartman, PBF Board, provided a discussion of the history/mission/goals of the proposed PBF Government Affairs Committee which included the following highlights. • Ms. Hartman is a newly appointed member of the PBF Board of Directors. • At an August PBF Board meeting, the board created a new Government Affairs Committee. • Ms. Hartman was appointed chair of this new committee. • A solicitation of applications to join this committee has been posted; 4 applications have been received. Mr. Hartman will bring recommended member names to the board on 10/27. • The purpose of this committee has been advertised in the PBF e-blast and included in today's agenda packet. There is some overlap of interests with PBSD interests. • There are 6,500 owners and 1,800 registered voters in Pelican Bay; $8 billion in assessed value. • Pelican Bay is among the largest HOAs in the state. • The PBF is looking to be more engaged at the state level in relation to PB interests, seeking to add lobbying efforts to protect PB interests. • Ms. Hartman would like a PBSD Board member to join this committee. • Once the committee is established, a charter will be established, and shared with the PBSD. • The intent of the committee is to supplement the work of the PBSD, especially at the state and federal level. Ms. Polke commented that she is excited about this committee and would like to join it. She noted that recently she attempted to reach out to Governor Desantis regarding PB beach renourishment issues, without any success. Dr. Chicurel commented that of the 12 items listed under "purpose and scope" of this committee, seven are PBSD responsibilities dictated by County ordinances. IIe noted that the PBSD Board is comprised of members of the PB community. IIe questioned why the PBF needs to create a committee which is duplicating what the PBSD does. Ms. Hartman commented that the interests of each entity are not identical; PBF needs are different and distinct from the PBSD. Dr. Chicurel expressed concern that the PBSD Board was referred to as a weakness within a PBF master plan document. Ms. Hartman apologized for this. She noted that the intent of this new committee is to utilize the capabilities of PB residents to advance the interests of Pelican Bay which are not cmTently being addressed. Mr. Griffith commented that he agreed with Dr. Chicurel's comments. Ms. Polke commented that Ms. Hartman's work is very important and suggested that the PBSD is not doing everything correctly. She questioned why the PBSD did not schedule an emergency dredge of Clam Pass after the 2024 hurricanes. Ms. Polke noted that we need more open dialogue. Mr. Rodburg commented that the work of this committee would be a positive in relation to lobbying efforts and legislation review at the state level. He noted that the Board of County Commissioners has delegated certain responsibilities to the PBSD; the PBSD Board is advisory to the BCC. Mr. Rodburg questioned whether a PBSD Board member can serve on this committee. Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session October 8, 2025 Mr. Fogg commented that he supports the PBF in creating this committee, especially for lobbying efforts related to PB interests. He cautioned about certain circumstances where there would be a conflict of interest between this new committee and the PBSD Board. Mr. Fogg noted that PBSD Board members are publicly elected and that PBSD meetings are all publicly held. Mr. Swider commented on the expertise and depth of knowledge of PBSD consultants, who have provided reports and recommendations to us over the past 30 years. LANDSCAPE &SAFETY Dr. Chicurel reported that the Landscape & Safety Committee met on 9/11/25 and noted that the background information for the proposed pilot project to replace crosswalks at one intersection was included in the agenda packet. His discussion of this proposal included the following. • At two Landscape & Safety Committee meetings (Spring 2025), Johnson Engineering reviewed seven different options to remedy our crosswalk issues (many of them continue to fail, requiring constant repairs), and the community and committee discussed these options at length, learning and understanding technical information regarding crosswalk construction. • The Landscape & Safety Committee voted unanimously to recommend to the full board that we proceed with a pilot project to see if a new construction approach using similar colored pavers, rated for heavy traffic and large trucks, utilizing weep holes to prevent water buildup in the crosswalk basin, would result in a stable crosswalk, that is ADA compliant and consistent with the look of the existing crosswalks throughout Pelican Bay, Ms. Polke commented that she attended recent Landscape &Safety Committee meetings and feels that this proposed expenditure is an unnecessary expense. She suggested that our crosswalks are repairable and that this project is not urgent or a priority. Ms. Polke commented that trees and beaches are more important and that we should let the community vote on this issue. In response, Dr. Chicurel commented (1) this issue was brought to the committee by staff, as staff is constantly addressing loose and/or damaged crosswalk pavers, (2) there have been resident accidents as a result of loose and/or damaged pavers, (3) stronger pavers, graded for heavy traffic, are needed in our community, and (4) this is a pilot project; not an expected community -wide project. Mr. Griffith commented in favor of the proposed pilot project, using the proposed stronger pavers which will look the same as the existing pavers. He noted that although this is the more expensive option, we will not have to replace all of our crosswalks. Mr. Griffith commented that the committee did not make a firm decision on the length of time needed to adequately review the sturdiness of the newly installed pavers. Dr. Chicurel motioned, Mr. Griffith seconded that the PBSD Board approves a pilot construction project replacing the two crosswalks at the intersection of Gulf Park Drive and Ridgewood Drive utilizing the specifications provided by Johnson Engineering. The motion carried 84, with Ms. Polke dissenting. WATER MANAGEMENT Mr. Swider commented that the Water Management Committee met on Oct. 6 and reviewed the coastal engineering assessment and management recommendations regarding the Bay Colony dune swale by Dr. Mohamed Dabees, Coastal Engineer with Humiston & Moore Engineers. The committee 5 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session October 8, 2025 and staff agreed with the recommendations, and agreed not to undertake a large restoration project to include a concrete pipe. Mr. Coleman commented that the committee recommended that the board approves going forward with the Humiston & Moore recommendations, which were read by Mr. Swider as follows. • Continue to monitor the physical and environmental changes along the swale banks and beach/dune systems. • Develop a nature -based plan to restore the vegetations and mangrove shorelines along the dune back slopes where possible. • Restore and maintain dune vegetation to reduce sand over wash into the Swale during heavy rain and storm events. • Periodic monitoring of the hydraulic function and water flow in the Swale to address any blockage or restriction to the flow. Mr•. Fogg commented that this issue came about as a result of the inundation of sand into the Bay Colony dune swale from 2024 hurricanes. He noted that a few individuals in Bay Colony had suggested a multi -million -dollar pipe hardening solution. Mr. Fogg commented that he agrees with Humiston & Moore recommendations and suggested that we meet with Bay Colony to discuss them. Ms. LuAnn Giovannelli, General Manager/COO of Bay Colony Community Association, commented that there are a few (but not all) Bay Colony residents who favor a pipe hardening solution and that she agreed that a meeting of stakeholders to discuss the Humiston & Moore recommendations would be beneficial. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT CLAM BAY Mr. Fogg commented that several months ago there was a proposal, driven by Seagate and Naples Cay residents (with concerns on water quality issues in their canals and damage in Outer Clam Bay from hurricanes), for the creation of a Clam Bay oversight committee. At a July BCC Board meeting, the BCC made a decision not to form a new committee, and requested that the PBSD commits to working with Seagate and Naples Cay on Clam Bay issues. Mr. Fogg reported that he attended a meeting on Sept. 9 with staff and key residents of Seagate and Naples Cay to discuss Clam Bay issues; notes on this meeting were included in the agenda packet. He suggested that the next Clam Bay Committee meeting is conducted as a workshop. Mr. Fogg discussed the following issues which were addressed at the Sept. 9 meeting. • The possibility of an annual dredge was discussed, and if this direction were taken, an analysis of the optimal time of year should be studied. This may improve water quality in Outer Clam Bay. • Historically, Clam Pass has been dredged in the fall, after the storm season, often causing sand deposits in the Pass. • A survey is needed to trigger a dredge project. It was suggested that a survey is targeted for the late fall to enable a spring dredge event. • We are facing permit renewal delays due to staff shortages in the U.S.A.C.E. Humiston & Moore recommends renewing our permit "as is" to prevent a further approval delay. • It was suggested that Humiston & Moore, along with staff, takes a broader view, starting from scratch, of what a desired plan would be in view of current environmental circumstances. Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session October 8, 2025 Seagate resident Patrick Wack has suggested that the Clam Bay Committee meets on some sort of regular session at least every other month, in season. Ms. Polke questioned why we cannot obtain a dredging permit from the Florida Environmental Protection Agency, in light of delays in the renewal of our permit with the U.S.A.C.E. Mr. Rodburg responded that both U.S.A.C.E. and FDEP dredging permits are required. Ms. Polke commented that Florida Fish and Wildlife (FWC) stated that they never received a request (in 2025) for an emergency dredge of Clam Pass, Ms. Polke commented that we have extensive sand in Clam Bay canals which is preventing water flow to the Gulf; 13 years with no dredging has not helped. She suggested that January/February would be a good time of year for an annual dredge. Mr. Rodburg commented that the permit requested from FWC was to reclaim the over washed sand behind South Beach, to restore the dunes. Because of turtle nesting in this area, we were denied approval for this project in the spring/summer timeframe and FWC suggested that we submit another request later in the season. Later on, we did submit another request which was approved, and now this work has begun. He noted that Ms. Polke's letter to FWC referred to Clam Pass dredging, which had nothing to do with our PBSD request. Ms. Polke commented that we are permitted to dredge during turtle season and we did not make use of our permit (to dredge during spring/summer 2025). Mr. Rodburg commented that the purpose of dredging Clam Pass is to preserve the tidal flows so as to maintain the health of the mangroves and overall ecosystem, and has nothing to do primarily with beach renourishment or over washed sand. He noted that we have been asked to take a closer look at the parameters needed for a dredge event and whether our templates are appropriate. Mr. Rodburg commented that our next dredge event is scheduled to occur in about a month and is based on a long -running program of tidal ratio monitoring. Mr. Rodburg reported that a Clam Bay Committee meeting is scheduled for Nov. 20, which should have occurred in early October. Unfortunately, the scheduled meeting in early October had to be canceled when we lost our quorum for the meeting. He noted that it is difficult to schedule committee meetings when committee members do not respond to inquiries on availability to attend a meeting. Mr. Rodburg commented that Ms. Polke never responded as to her availability to attend our Nov. 20 Clam Bay Committee meeting. OPERATIONS BUILDING DEDICATION CEREMONY Mr. Coleman suggested that the board attends a dedication ceremony of om• new Operations Building directly following a monthly board meeting. POSSIBLE LIVE STREAMING OF PBSD BOARD MEETINGS Mr. Fogg commented that at the last board meeting there was some discussion on the possibility of the PBF live streaming our board meetings. Mr. Dorrill commented that in the past, the PBF live streamed a joint PBSD/PBF meeting. He noted that the BCC Chamber has this capability, and could be used if the board thought a specific board meeting was important enough to live stream. Mr. Rodburg commented that the County is clearly not in favor of ZOOM meetings and suggested that the PBF could live stream our meetings, if they chose to. Mr. Fogg suggested that staff follows up with the PBF to determine whether they would be interested in live streaming our board meetings. The meetinE was adjourned at 3:06 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session October 8, 2025 Michael Fogg, Chairman Minutes approved [] as presented OR �] as amended ON 1 date Agenda Item #6 Page 1 of 1 Pelican Bay Services Division Project Tracking Summary 11/7/2025 PBSD New Maintenance Facilities (Project 50211) Construction is at substantial completion and a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy is imminent. Sidewalk Improvements (Project 50212) The work is completed and the sidewalk passed inspection on 9/9/2025. A one-year warranty is in effect beginning on 9/9/2025. The Contractor will submit a final invoice and then the project will be closed out. Clam Pass Funding in the amount of $434,758.50 was obtained from the Tourist Development Council to dredge Clam Pass and reclaim sand to rebuild the dune at Clam Pass Park. Work began on November 3 and is anticipated to be completed within 3-4 months. The contractor will also reclaim sand from Clam Pass Park beach, and the South beach restaurant area to rebuild the dune. Planting of mangroves back in Clam Bay and dune vegetation will follow this project. Sand Reclamation and Dune Restoration The Division was given approval by Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission and work began on October 1 to reclaim sand that was pushed east into the mangroves by Hurricanes Helene and Milton. This sand will be used to rebuild the dune and be completed ahead of Collier County Coastal Zone Management beach renourishment project anticipated to begin in December. The approximate cost for this project is $1.4 million Collier County Coastal Zone Management Beach Renourishment Collier County Coastal Zone Management's beach renourishment project is anticipated to begin in December starting at Marker 36. The contractor will work from the area slightly south of the North Beach restaurant and head north back to Vanderbilt Beach. PBSD will pay approximately $2.4 million for the sand which includes costs for trucking, environmental monitoring, surveying, placement/grading, and project management for the portion generally from Marker 36 to the Bay Colony Beach Club. Mangrove and Dune Plantings Following the Collier County beach renourishment project, mangroves will be replanted in Clam Bay and sand tolerant plantings (seagrape, buttonwood, sea oats) will be installed along the new done. Contessa and Bay Colony Community Association Drainage Easements The Contessa Condominium and Bay Colony Community Association have initiated the process to grant PBSD drainage easements to improve flow and effectively extend the existing Dune Swale drainage easement further south across the Contessa property to the southern property line shared with BCCA and allow for both entities to obtain permit approval for construction of initial drainage improvements, that once completed, are intended to maintained by PBSD. Pinecrest Lake 2-3 Restoration Lake bank restoration project is completed. Erosion was repaired with a combination of regrading and sod, and riprap. Pelican Bay Decorative Traffic Signs The first set of 30 new decorative traffic signs are in production and the work is tentatively scheduled to begin in late December/early January. All traffic signs will be replaced over a period of five years. PELICAN BAY BALANCE SHEET Oct 31, 2025 )UNAUDITED) Pell[an Bay Landscape, Pelican Bay Street Safety, Lake &Beach Clam Bay Capital Assessment Financed Cepltal Operating Fund Lighting Projects Projects funded Activities Projects " OLD FUND NUMBER INT)8 322 320 323 1007O00OND 1008000000 3041000000 3040000000 Total 3042000000 TOTAL ASSETS Cash and investments Interest receivable Trade receivable, net ROU Lease Recelable-Current Due from other Funds Due from other governments Total asseU 1,4]4,)56.6) 146,509.56 2,]38,594.23 142,061.30 q,48q,]21.]0 3T6,91D52 I 4,861,632.26 LIABILITIFS AND FUND BAIANCE Liabilities: Accounts payable 46,998.27 40960.81 213,896.34 - 265,855.42 150]]9.80 281,635.22 Wages payable - - - - - - Retainage payable - 251,860.14 - 2510860.14 325,000.00 576,860.14 Due to other Government - - - - - - - Deferredlnnows-Leasea - - - - - - - CommercialPaperLoan 5,130,000.00 5,130,000.00 5,130,OOD.00 Total liabilities 46,998.27 4,960.81 5,595,756,40 5,641,715.56 340,))9.80 5,988,495.36 Fund balances: Fund balance 1,428,590.48 143,548.75 (2,84),401.6]) 1424861.30 (101320393.14) 36,130.72 (14096,362.42) Total liabilities and fund balances 1,4)5,596.)5 148,509,56 2,740,354.e1 142,861.30 4,515,322.42 3760910.52 4,892,232.94 Fund Balance at the end of the period 1,428,598.40 143,548.75 (2,84],401.6)) 1420861.30 36,130.73 Approved Project Financing Available to Draw Unspent balance of projects: Small projects undar$200K- 50303-PB$D 9lgnage- 50126-Beach Renourishment - - 4,629,764.58 - 50211-PBSD OPS BUD - - ]]40869.27 - 50212-PBSD P112-SW - - 281,247.81 - 51026-PBSD take Bank Restoration - - 48%591.49 - 51100-Gam Bay Restoration 363,698.04 Total unspent balance of major projects )1)97,))3.39 363,698.04 Budgeted reserves 991000-Reserve for contingencies 136,400.00 11,000.00 - - ', - 991700-Reserve fordisas[er relief - - - - i - I 992090-Reserve rsinking fund - 993000-Reserve for capital outlay 129,300.00 28,900.00 - - - 994500- Reserve for future construction and improvement - - - - - 998000-Reserve for cash 475,000.00 40*000.00 Total budgeted reserves 701,200.00 79,900.00 Budgeted commitments at the end of the period 701,200.00 79,900.00 707970773.39 3630698.04 1 7270398.48 63,648.75 (101645,175.06) (220,836.74) -_�$ 36J30.72 Financing Recap: Funding forcurrent sidewalk program planned 6,500,000.00 This is the difference between interest Funding reserved for future capital projects 3,500,000.00 earned on unspent proceeds and Financing Secured 10,000,000.00 accrued interest paid on the borrowing. § 06 ` §� ( �) cj „ \ \ \4a \ a\ \ } ¥" §} \u a � � J\ )k §P§§}[ \\ ! 606 �4 � � 2 $ } )j § &) go � \_\ §2 _}§ k {\} §! 49 {\\ k \))\\\ -- - r�§`}\_/\ §�;([ 2 \� -\\\ \ k*� \�w &/A {§§/\a`§ o § § §) §§! !I! )§ 5 Lfi !! 95 5 vi J� \) .� \} }} k} §\[ i} )/}k§ \ )) mw ,. a , 3,3..3...§5 §! ..,.,... ` 5 /{ } \\\\ ! , §5 ! ........ ].§..1...§5 | ! & J( }) &})§;\})/»\ E \ \ \(\/ \\\\\\\\\\ \\ \� i \/(k 7 m§ i/ f2 ( (\/} � / \ \\� ) : § #\\§§\\§§%\/\{ \ _ \\! !!{ !$, \)\ oq 46 \ \. / 1 ( ) ) ) 2 _ ,§ \u \§ )/ . , as e. §§)m(� «m13 bR . \\\ \ ��\\/ �!(\ )/ Agenda Item#9 Page 1 of 1 Barbara Shea Prom: Cindy POlke Sent: Monday, November 3, 2025 11:11 AM To: Barbara Shea Cc: NeilDorrill; Chad Coleman Subject: Agenda Items for consideration Barbara, I would like to ask for the following items be considered for discussion to the November 12th agenda: piscuss adding a stop light at Gulf Park and Tamiami Trail N. Obtain drone videos of the areas PBSD is responsible for maintaining in the Pelican Bay Community: Clam Bay, Clam Pass, the beaches, adjacent waterways, Berm, lakes, streets, signs, landscape, pipes, and sidewalks. Add PBSp board member emails and phone numbers on the website with their consent. Torm limits for PBSD members Schedule beginning and end of year PBSD workshops for board members to meet informally in public. Thanks, Cindy Pollee Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing: Pyenda Item #10 Page 1 of 2 Barbara Shea Subject: FW: Traffic Light— Gulf Park and US 41 ----- Forwarded Message From: Michael and Rosalie Johnson -Fogg <iohnson-foggCcDatt.net> To: John Duken (PBF BOD) <iohn.dukenApelicanbay.org> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2025 at 04:11:14 PM EDT Subject: Re: Traffic Light Discussion — Gulf Park and US 41 Hi John, This issue goes back quite a while. Many residents complained over the danger posed by vehicles turning left (going north) out of Gulf Park onto 41, Both because that is inherently dangerous, requiring the vehicle crossing 4 or 5 lanes of high speed traffic on 41, and because it is endangers north bound vehicles turning on to Gulf Park from 41. Often Gulf Park exiting traffic does not wait for both north and south bound lanes of 41 to clear before exiting, and park themselves in the north bound turn lane on 41, blocking the intersection and the view of oncoming 41 south bound traffic from those turning on Gulf Park. So the danger is clear and the FDOT study of the intellection concluded that it meets their criteria for a traffic light installation. However, they also state that there is no FDOT money available in their 5 year plan. Several years ago, PBSD in response to concern over this issue did what it could within the confines of Pelican Bay, by putting in "right turn only" signage and temporary barriers to encourage same. PBSD has no jurisdiction over the intersection itself as it on 41 which is a State road. This was done to some degree as a trial. Most vehicles follow the signage, those that don't appear mainly to be non-residents of Pelican Bay, such as contractors. There has been little feed back from the community to the PBF or PBSD suggesting the change was not supported by the community. A few residents have mentioned at PBSD meetings the risk encountered by vehicles wishing to turn left from Gulf park having to cross 3 lanes of southbound 41 to make a u-turn., something that can be dangerous if vehicle owners are not patient. Some residents (not clear how many) would prefer to go further and put a traffic light at the intersection and some (not clear how many) would not. Those against mainly appear to be residents who live adjacent to the intersection and have concerns over the increased in noise generated from vehicles starting and accelerating from the light. An added benefit of a traffic light is it's positive effect on traffic calming. Almost everyone agrees that traffic on 41 travels too fast. Installation of a traffic light is possible per FDOT if Pelican Bay pays for the installation, estimated at $2.0 million. It might also be possible to mount a lobbying campaign to move the project up on FDOT's priority list, and perhaps have them pay for it ( perhaps an issue for the "Government Affairs Cormmitte"). The outstanding issue is community support one way or another. In discussions with Susan Levine it was agreed that this issue might best be addressed as a safety issue within the PBF strategic planning activity. PBF is better positioned than PBSD to poll residents and set tip community meetings on these type of topics, but the issue has not been a high priority in their considerations, Based on PBSD actions and early encouragement FDOT are prepared make PBSD's temporary tight turn solution permanent by extending the median on 41, to prevent the left turn out of Gulf Park. They would do this as part of a resurfacing project planned for 41 in 2027. For those that favor the traffic light solution there is concern that if this is done it would take the traffic light solution off the table, at least for the foreseeable future. Agenda Item #10 Page 2 of 2 PBSD's position is that the right turn only solution is a safety improvement and has been in place for some time. We have not taken a position on the traffic light. My best reading of the current board is that we would support and be pleased to work with PBF to pursue installation of a traffic light if it has broad support in the community. I am not sure whether PBSD could contribute funds to the installation, being outside our jurisdiction, although the end of the day that does not matter because it is the residents of Pelican Bay who would be paying one way or another. Another thing to ascertain on the traffic light is whether this would receive support from the Sheriffs office and County Commissioners both of whom would have a say in this. Hope this is helpful. Please call me if you want to discuss further. Best regards, MJF