Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agenda 10/14/2025 Item # 9A (Ord. Amending Ord. 11-41 as amended the Hacienda Lakes Mixed-Use PUD - ASW-PL20240011790)
10/14/2025 Item # 9.A ID# 2025-3540 Executive Summary *** This item to be heard at 1:00 PM. *** This item requires that Board members provide ex-parte disclosure. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 11-41, as amended, the Hacienda Lakes Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development, to approve an insubstantial change to the PUD, to add deviations for relief from the Collier County Land Development Code relating to architectural glazing standards, building façade massing, light fixture heights, loading spaces, landscape standards for interior vehicular use areas, and signage, and providing for an effective date. The subject parcel is in the Commercial Tract of the MPUD located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Road in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of +/-25.86 acres of the +/-2,262 acre MPUD. (PL20240011559) (This Item is a companion to 8.A. ASW-PL20240011790) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff's findings and recommendations regarding the above-referenced petition and render a decision regarding the petition; and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The site is approximately ±25.86 acres in the Commercial Tract of the ±2,262 acre Hacienda Lakes MPUD located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The petitioner requests an Insubstantial Change to the PUD (PDI) for the development of a new Costco Wholesale with deviations for relief from the Collier County Land Development Code relating to architectural glazing standards, building facade massing, light fixture heights, loading spaces, landscape standards for interior vehicular use areas, and signage. More specifically, the following six deviations are requested (deviations are numbered below consistent with how they appear in the PUD Exhibit E "List of Requested Deviations from the LDC" in the attached draft Ordinance): Deviation #20 - From LDC Section 4.02.08 for relief from the maximum light pole height of 25 feet. Deviation #21 - From LDC Section 4.05.04.C for relief from the additional requirement to obtain a variance and provide double the interior landscaping if the commercial project includes more than 120% of the required parking. Deviation #22 - From LDC Section 4.05.06.B for relief from the minimum loading spaces required to allow five loading spaces. Deviation #23 - From LDC Section 5.05.08.D.2.b.i for relief from the requirement for 45% glazing on three combined primary facades of the building to allow a combination of glazing and planted trellis for a total of 23% (12% glazing and 11% planted trellis). Deviation #24 - From LDC Section 5.05.08.D.4 for relief from the required variations in building facades greater than 150 feet in length for a break in massing. Deviation #25 - From LDC Section 5.06.04.F.4 for relief from the maximum signage square footage requirement in nonresidential districts and number of signs. The petitioner has made refinements to the requested changes since original submittal. Originally, nine deviations were requested, along with a change to defer a transportation commitment and provide a transit bus stop/shelter on the subject site to an alternative future outparcel location. Through the review and hearing process, two deviations were removed by the petitioner per staff recommendation, and one other deviation was removed per the petitioner's preference. One was for the foundation planting bed requirement, and the other was for the light poles not being located in the landscaped islands with trees. The third deviation removed was to retain the Auto-Service Station Waiver as a separate petition, as preferred by the applicant, due to separate application fees being paid. During the July 17, 2025, CCPC hearing on this item, the petitioner further refined the request by agreeing to eliminate the request to defer the transportation commitment, thereby providing a transit bus stop/shelter. Additionally, the petitioner agreed to increase the buffer landscaping by 25% and to reduce the extent of the sign deviation request by eliminating the south-facing sign, thereby reducing the proposed total square feet of signage from 1,117 to 801 square feet. The 30-square-foot liquor sign is permitted separately. All these refinements are reflected in the attached draft Ordinance. Page 474 of 6526 10/14/2025 Item # 9.A ID# 2025-3540 COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: Insubstantial Changes to PUDs are typically decided by the Hearing Examiner; however, this item was considered by the CCPC at its July 17, 2025, hearing as a companion to the Auto Service Station Waiver petition ASW-PL20240011790. During the July 17, 2025, CCPC hearing, several members of the public spoke in opposition to the intensification of the vacant site, expressing concerns about traffic, safety, and the proposed development's impact on the neighborhoods to the east. The Planning Commission ultimately recommended approval, subject to three conditions: Deviation #21 shall be subject to an increase in buffer landscaping by 25%; Deviation #25 shall be revised to reflect that the south-facing sign is eliminated with a corresponding reduction in total sign area; and the petitioner shall maintain the transportation commitment to provide the bus stop/shelter (rather than defer it). The petitioner has agreed to these recommendations, and they are incorporated in the Draft Ordinance accompanying this summary. This item is consistent with the Collier County strategic plan objective to encourage diverse economic opportunities by fostering a business-friendly environment. FISCAL IMPACT: The insubstantial change, by itself, will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build-out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the waiver is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new development will likely have an impact on Collier County's public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impact of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by the application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The site is within Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict 7. The Mixed Use Activity Center concept is designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated, thereby avoiding strip and disorganized patterns of commercial development and creating focal points within the community. Transportation Planning staff has evaluated the proposed changes. The changes present no transportation related issue with consistency. There are no additional uses proposed, no changes to the PUD trip impacts, and no additional impacts on the adjacent roadways. Therefore, Transportation Planning staff finds the petition consistent with the GMP. The policies of the Future Land Use Element and Transportation Element of the GMP have been reviewed and applied to this proposal. Staff finds that the changes are insubstantial, and the project continues to be consistent with the GMP and the Subdistrict. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is an insubstantial change to the Hacienda Lakes Planned Unit Development. LDC Section 10.02.13.E.2 provides: “An insubstantial change to an approved PUD Ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13.E.1 [criteria for substantial changes] and shall … be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application ….” LDC Section 10.02.13.E.1 provides in part: For the purpose of this section, a substantial change shall be deemed to exist where: a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)? b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units, the intensity of land use, or the height of buildings within the development? Page 475 of 6526 10/14/2025 Item # 9.A ID# 2025-3540 c. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development greater than 5% of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five acres in area? d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses to include institutional, commercial, and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation, or open space), or a proposed relocation of non-residential land uses? e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development, which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation, changes in traffic circulation, or impacts on other public facilities? f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention or otherwise increased stormwater discharge? h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or amendments to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan, or which modification would increase the density or intensity of the permitted land uses? j. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such a change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. §380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13, or k. Any modification to the PUD master plan, PUD document, or amendment to a PUD ordinance that impacts any consideration is deemed to be a substantial modification, as described under this LDC section 10.02.13. The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Executive Summary and the oral testimony presented at the hearing, as these items relate to these criteria. Should this item be denied, Florida Statutes section 125.022(3) requires the County to provide written notice to the applicant citing applicable portions of an ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority for the denial. This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for approval. – (HFAC) RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 11-41, as amended, the Hacienda Lakes Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development for Costco Wholesale Petition PDI-PL20240011559, an insubstantial change to the PUD, to add deviations for relief from the Collier County Land Development Code. PREPARED BY: Ray Bellows, AICP, Zoning Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Costco PDI - Staff Report (7-17 CCPC) 2. Costco PDI - Attachment A - Backup Package (7-17 CCPC) 3. Costco PDI - Attachment B - Conceptual Site Plan (7-17 CCPC) 4. Costco PDI - Attachment C - Legal Ad and Sign Posting (7-17 CCPC) 5. Costco PDI - Attachment D - Ordinance - 092325 6. Costco PDI - Attachment E - Public Opposition Correspondences (7-17 CCPC) 7. Costco PDI - Attachment F - Public Support Correspondences (7-17 CCPC) 8. Costco PDI - Attachment G - Ord 11-41 & Original Hacienda Lakes MPUD Findings 9. Costco PDI - Attachment H - 7-10-25- From MSpokojny - Costco Traffic Document For CCPC July 2025 10. Sign Posting Affidavit for 10-14 BCC 11. legal ad - agenda IDs 25-3540 & 25-3533 - Costco (Hacienda Lakes) PDI & ASW -10.14.25 BCC Page 476 of 6526 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JULY 17, 2025 SUBJECT: PDI-PL20240011559, COSTCO WHOLESALE APPLICANT/AGENT: Owner: Applicant and Agent: Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Brad C. Wester 7742 Alico Road Costco Wholesale c/o Driver, McAfee, Ft. Myers, FL 33912 Hawthorne & Diebenow, PLLC 1 Independent Drive, Ste 1200 Jacksonville, FL REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests for an insubstantial change to the to add deviations for relief from the Collier County Land Development Code relating to architectural glazing standards, building façade massing, light fixture heights, loading spaces, landscape standards for interior vehicular use areas, and signage, to revise a transportation commitment, and providing for an effective date. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The approximately ±25.86 acres subject parcel is in the Commercial Tract of the ±2,262 acre MPUD and is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Road in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on page 2). Page 477 of 6526 PDI-PL20240011559, Costco Wholesale Page 2 of 14 June 17, 2025 Page 478 of 6526 PDI-PL20240011559, Costco Wholesale Page 3 of 14 June 17, 2025 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The governing document for the Hacienda Lakes Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD), Ordinance 22-18, approved the subject property as the Commercial Tract in the MPUD, approximately 25.86 acres. The request is for an Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) for the development of a new Costco Wholesale store located generally at the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Drive and Collier Boulevard. More specifically, the subject property is identified by the Collier County Parcel ID Number 48586002021 (the “Property”) in the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. The MPUD was most recently amended in 2022 by way of Ordinance 22-18. The PDI is a request specific to the commercially designated property within the MPUD, as further described below. The PDI is required for the proposed Costco Wholesale development, specifically for relief from architectural glazing standards, massing, and light fixture heights per LDC 5.05.08, as well as loading spaces and landscape standards for additional parking per LDC 4.05.04.C, and signage per Land Development Code (LDC) 5.06.04. This Insubstantial Change to a PUD request is based on the six (6) deviations that are being requested, which are: 1. From LDC Section 4.02.08 for relief from the maximum light pole height of 25 feet. 2. From LDC Section 4.05.04.C for relief from the additional requirement to obtain a variance and provide double the interior landscaping if the commercial project includes more than 120% of the required parking. 3. From LDC Section 4.05.06.B for relief from the minimum loading spaces required. 4. From LDC Section 5.05.08.D.2.b.i for relief from the façade requirement for 15% of glazing (‘glass’) on primary facades for a reduction from the total 45% for all facades. 5. From LDC Section 5.05.08.D.4 for relief from the required variations in building facades greater than 150 feet in length for a break in massing. 6. From LDC Section 5.06.04.F.4 for relief from the maximum signage square footage requirement in nonresidential districts These deviations will be explained more in the Staff Analysis section of this Staff Report. LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties near the portion of the PUD affected by the request. North: Rattlesnake Hammock Road R.O.W. and developed mixed-use commercial and residential, zoned Hammock Park Commerce Center Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) East: Vacant, zoned “Residential/Medical Use” tract in the Hacienda Lakes MPUD South: Developed commercial, zoned Collier Regional Medical Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) West: Collier Boulevard R.O.W. and developed commercial, zoned Sierra Meadows PUD Page 479 of 6526 PDI-PL20240011559, Costco Wholesale Page 4 of 14 June 17, 2025 Subject Property Zoning Map; Source: Collier County GIS, ESRI Base Zoning Map; Source: Collier County GIS, ESRI SUBJECT PROPERTY SUBJECT PROPERTY Page 480 of 6526 PDI-PL20240011559, Costco Wholesale Page 5 of 14 June 17, 2025 STAFF ANALYSIS: Comprehensive Planning: The site is situated within Mixed-Use Activity Center Subdistrict 7. The Mixed-Use Activity Center concept is designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can readily be accommodated, to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial development, and to create focal points within the community. The proposed Insubstantial amendments do not affect the applicability of the GMP language; therefore, the proposed PDI is consistent with the Future Land Use Designation. The policies of the Future Land Use Element of the GMP have been reviewed and applied to this proposal. Staff finds that the changes are insubstantial, and the project continues to be consistent with the GMP and the Subdistrict. Architectural Review: In accordance with LDC Section 5.05.08, the Architectural and Site Design Standards shall apply unless additional or different design standards that deviate from 5.05.08, in whole or in part, are submitted to the County. The proposed Costco Wholesale PDI will allow for the deviation process in Section 5.05.08 G of the LDC. The applicant intends to propose an alternative design and justification at the time of SDP application to accomplish the purpose and intent of the architectural and site design standards of LDC Section 5.05.08. Architectural review staff can support the Costco Wholesale PDI Development Document and recommends approval. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has evaluated the proposed changes. The changes present no transportation related issue with consistency. There are no additional uses proposed, no changes to the PUD trip impacts, and no additional impacts on the adjacent roadways. Therefore, Transportation Planning staff finds the petition consistent with the GMP. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition and recommends approval of this request. Zoning Review: Zoning staff reviewed the Insubstantial Change to the PUD request based on the six (6) deviations for the development of a Costco Wholesale at the subject property. Based on the nature of the request, petition, and the responses provided by the applicant to the criteria for an Insubstantial Change to a PUD, LDC Sec. 10.02.13.E.1. a through k, this petition is sufficient for an insubstantial change request. The subject property is zoned as a Commercial Tract within the existing Hacienda Lakes MPUD. This is also located within Activity Center 7, at the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard, as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Element. Accordingly, “The maximum amount of commercial uses allowed at Activity Center #7 (Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard) is 40 acres per quadrant,…”. The proposed development is permitted on the subject property because it is a commercial retail use. The PDI requests are for specific development deviations in order for a Costco Wholesale to be developed on site. Page 481 of 6526 PDI-PL20240011559, Costco Wholesale Page 6 of 14 June 17, 2025 Activity Center 7 Map displaying subject property location of Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI in Tract G Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI – Master Plan, Commercial Tract Identification SUBJECT PROPERTY Page 482 of 6526 PDI-PL20240011559, Costco Wholesale Page 7 of 14 June 17, 2025 Regarding the requested deviations, zoning staff has provided a thorough review and analysis of each request in the Deviation Discussion. Since the beginning of the application process, the applicant has submitted nine deviations. Two deviations were removed by the applicant per staff recommendation, and one other deviation was removed per the applicant’s preference. One was for the foundation planting bed requirement, and the other was for the light poles not being located in the landscape islands with trees. The last deviation removed was to retain the Auto- Service Station Waiver as a separate petition, as preferred by the applicant, due to separate application fees being paid. Staff determined the PDI request more sufficient with a reduction in deviations requested. The remaining six deviations pertain specifically to light pole height, interior landscaping, loading spaces, glazing façade requirements, variations in building façades for massing, and, lastly, building signage requirements. The justification for each deviation has been deemed sufficient, and more analysis is provided in the Deviation Discussion section below. A specific deviation that relates directly to adjustments to signs is Deviation 7. This deviation is from maximum sign area requirements, and the applicant was considerate in removing signs facing the residences to the east, due to possible nuisance issues with the residences. This reduced the overall request for this deviation request, gaining staff’s support for the necessity and execution of signs for the proposed wholesale store. Zoning Staff determined that the final six (6) proposed deviations are sufficient in order for the development of the proposed Costco Wholesale. Staff concurs that the deviations provided by the applicant are sufficient for the PDI request and will help maintain the general health, safety, and welfare of the public. Therefore, zoning staff is recommending APPROVAL. Landscape Review: Landscape review, analysis, and recommendation is included in the analysis and recommendation below in the Deviation Discussion section below, in Deviation #2, Staff Analysis and Recommendation, and Zoning Staff recommends APPROVAL. Conservation Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has determined that this project is consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). No revisions to the environmental portions of the PUD are being requested. Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff have reviewed this petition. The request is to amend (Ordinance 22-18) to modify the PUD to obtain relief from architectural standards and landscape standards. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as it falls outside the scope of land development project reviews identified in Section 2- 1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the proposed petition. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE CRITERIA: There are three types of changes to a PUD Ordinance: Substantial, Insubstantial, and Minor. An insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or minor change. An insubstantial change to an approved PUD Ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. The LDC Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 set forth the Page 483 of 6526 PDI-PL20240011559, Costco Wholesale Page 8 of 14 June 17, 2025 criteria by which insubstantial amendments to a PUD Master Plan and/or minor text changes to a PUD document are to be reviewed before they can be approved. The criteria and a response to each have been listed as follows: LDC Section 10.02.13.E.1: a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)? No, there is no proposed change in the boundary of the MPUD. b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units, the intensity of land use, or the height of buildings within the development? No, there is no proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of commercial uses or height of buildings within the MPUD development. c. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development greater than 5% of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five acres in area? No, there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the MPUD development. d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses to include institutional, commercial, and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation, or open space), or a proposed relocation of non-residential land uses? No, there is no proposed increase in the size of commercial areas, or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses in the MPUD. e. Is there a substantial increase in the impact of the development, which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation, changes in traffic circulation, or impacts on other public facilities? No, there is no proposed substantial increase in the impacts of the MPUD based on existing approved commercial land uses. f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? No, there is no proposed change in existing approved commercial land use allowances that generate a higher level of traffic. Page 484 of 6526 PDI-PL20240011559, Costco Wholesale Page 9 of 14 June 17, 2025 g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? No, there is no proposed change that will result in increased stormwater retention or discharge. h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? No, there is no proposed change to the subject property’s existing commercial land use within the MPUD that will bring about any adjacent incompatibility. i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan, PUD Document, or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan, or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? No, there is no proposed change in the existing approved commercial land use in the MPUD that results in any inconsistency with the FLUE or GMP. j. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. §380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly does not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13. No, there is no proposed change in the existing approved commercial land use in the MPUD that results in any requirement to amend the DRI. k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this LDC section 10.02.13. No, the request is not considered a substantial modification. LDC Section 10.02.13.E.2: Insubstantial change determination. An insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or minor change. An insubstantial change to an approved PUD Ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. The Planning Commission approval shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application, attached as Attachment G to the staff report, and be an action taken at a regularly scheduled meeting: The petition proposes site-specific modifications in order to develop and construct a Costco Wholesale on the Commercial Tract within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. As such, it is an insubstantial change and successfully meets the criteria of LDC 10.02.13 E.1, and the proposed Page 485 of 6526 PDI-PL20240011559, Costco Wholesale Page 10 of 14 June 17, 2025 changes do not change the original analysis, rezone findings, or PUD findings for the original application and staff report included as Attachment G. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking six (6) deviations from the requirements of the Land Development Code (LDC). The deviations are listed below with staff analysis and recommendations. Proposed Deviation #1 seeks relief from the LDC Section 4.02.08 for the maximum light pole height of 25 feet to a new maximum height of 36.5 feet. Petitioner’s Justification: This deviation is required since the 25-foot height standard will add up to 13 more poles to the overall site. The requested 36.5-foot height allows for a reduced amount of poles overall reducing visual clutter and will still adhere to the photometric standard at the property edge. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: To meet the code requirement of 25-foot light poles, the subject property would require 62 light poles and 88 fixtures. This deviation seeks an increase of 11.5 feet to an overall height of 36.5 feet; however, this will reduce the overall number of light poles by 13 and result in a reduction of 19 fixtures, thereby reducing the clutter of light poles. The applicant will still adhere to the photometric standard at the property edge, reducing spillover and light pollution onto adjacent residential properties. The applicant also provided an exhibit comparing the light poles with royal palms, which reach full growth in 25 years, and the light poles are nearly 10 feet shorter, providing evidence for less clutter on site. This exhibit is included in the backup package, which is found in Attachment A. Therefore, Zoning Staff recommends APPROVAL. Proposed Deviation #2 seeks relief from the LDC Section 4.05.04.C for the additional requirement to obtain a variance and provide double the interior landscaping if the commercial project includes more than 120% of the required parking. The relief will not require a variance and allow the normal landscape requirements to apply to this commercial project. Petitioner’s Justification: This deviation is required per the enclosed parking exhibit, 149 spaces are depicted as overflow and provided in an existing FPL utility easement. 670 spaces are proposed outside the FPL easement on the main development area and is approximately 103% of the parking standard maximum, which is below the 120% threshold on-site. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff findings indicate that approximately 217 trees will be required to meet the tree requirement of LDC 4.06.03. This will include two trees in each island in double rows of parking and one tree in each island in single rows of parking (with the possible exception of some of the islands that are located in the FPL transmission easement, where the FPL criteria for trees in transmission easements cannot be met). This is in addition to the required buffer trees and foundation trees for the building. Staff findings indicate that approximately 54,416 square feet of landscape area in and around the parking area will be required to meet the requirements of LDC 4.06.03. Given the amount of trees and landscape area that will be required in and around the parking area to meet LDC 4.06.03, Zoning Staff Page 486 of 6526 PDI-PL20240011559, Costco Wholesale Page 11 of 14 June 17, 2025 recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community,” and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” Proposed Deviation #3 seeks relief from the LDC Section 4.05.06.B for the minimum loading spaces required (3 plus 1 for each 25,000 square feet over 50,000 square feet) for a total amount of 5 loading spaces, which is the standard for this type of Costco Wholesale store. Petitioner’s Justification: This deviation is required for the requested 5 loading spaces is the required amount for Costco Wholesale (4 at the store building and 1 at the gas facility). The required Code amount is excessive and not warranted for this Costco Wholesale use as customarily used. Current Costco standard is 4 loading spaces attached to the building and 1 at the fuel facility. This number of spaces is standard for Costco operations. There is no need for additional loading spaces. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: According to current code standards, the minimum number of loading spaces required equals a total of 8 loading spaces. The justification provided is that the current Costco standard requires 4 loading spaces attached to the building and 1 at the gas facility. This Costco Wholesale will include a members-only gas station pending the approval of the companion Auto-Service Station Waiver (ASW), project number PL20240011790. The total of 5 loading spaces is the standard for Costco operations nationwide. Additional loading spaces are not required for this specific Costco use and would not be utilized if the required Code standard amount is adhered to. Therefore, Zoning Staff recommends APPROVAL. Proposed Deviation #4 seeks relief from the LDC Section 5.05.08.D.2.b.i for relief from the façade requirement for 15% of glazing (‘glass’) on primary facades for a reduction from the total 45% for all facades to a total of 23% (12% glazing and 11% planted trellis) per the architectural exhibit and descriptive chart included with this request. Petitioner’s Justification: This deviation is required because the building will incorporate planted metal trellises structurally attached to the building façade as an alternative to glazing in certain areas. This approach aims to mitigate the absence of glazing as much as possible, in alignment with the project’s program, while also contributing to the architectural aesthetics and functionality. Please see below calculations per elevation, totals provided by type and location, and overall totals compared to the overall provided. Page 487 of 6526 PDI-PL20240011559, Costco Wholesale Page 12 of 14 June 17, 2025 Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The applicant intends to propose alternative design and justification at the time of SDP application to accomplish the purpose and intent of the architectural and site design standards of LDC Section 5.05.08. After several adjustments to the deviation request, the applicant decided to include trellises that are attached to the building. Trellises that look free-standing away from the building are connected up high to the building. There are two types of trellises: Type A and Type B. Type A is designed to be directly anchored to the CMU wall, with a minimal separation between the building wall and the planted trellis wall. Type B is also connected to the CMU wall, has overhead beams that connect the detached planted trellis wall to the building. The planted trellis wall is 10 feet away from the building to generate the elevation break-up needed. These trellis types are being incorporated into the building as an alternative to glazing requirements. Where the trellises are located will help improve the building aesthetics rather than just removing the glazing altogether with no alternative. The required glazing is 5,462.2 SF, and the deviation request will reduce this to 3,072 SF in total for each side, which equates to a total of 23% for all sides, 12% glazing, and 11% trellises. Architectural review staff can support the Costco Wholesale PDI Development Document and recommends approval. Therefore, Zoning Staff recommends APPROVAL. Proposed Deviation #5 seeks relief from the LDC Section 5.05.08.D.4 for the required variations in building facades greater than 150 feet in length for a break in massing. Petitioner’s Justification: This deviation is required for the variation on the massing, the structurally attached planted trellis is providing an elevation break out for visual interest variations along the façade length. They are also strategically placed to work with the project’s program while contributing to the architectural aesthetics and meeting the spirit and intent of the requirement. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The applicant intends to propose alternative design and justification at the time of SDP application to accomplish the purpose and intent of the architectural and site design standards of LDC Section 5.05.08. After several adjustments to the deviation request, the applicant decided to include trellises that are attached to the building. Trellises that look free-standing away from the building are connected up high to the building. As mentioned in Deviation #5, these trellis types are being incorporated into the building as an alternative to glazing requirements where the trellises are located which will improve on the building aesthetics rather than just removing the glazing altogether with no alternative. Architectural review staff can support the Costco Wholesale PDI Development Document and recommends approval. Therefore, Zoning Staff recommends APPROVAL. Page 488 of 6526 PDI-PL20240011559, Costco Wholesale Page 13 of 14 June 17, 2025 Proposed Deviation #6 seeks relief from the LDC Section 5.06.04.F.4 for relief from the maximum signage square footage requirement in nonresidential districts for a proposed total of 367 square feet over the maximum combined of 750 square feet. The proposed signage total is 1,117 square feet. Elevations 1 & 3 are the North facing elevations and are 264 square feet over the maximum required amount for the ‘Costco Wholesale’ signage and ‘Liquor Sales’ directional/way-finding signage combined. Elevation 2 is the East-facing elevation, and it's not permitted to have a ‘Costco Wholesale’ advertisement wall sign, so it does not include one, but it will include a small, non-illuminated, 31 square foot directional/wayfinding ‘Tire Center’ sign over the tire center entrance. Elevation 4 is the South elevation and is 36 square feet over the required amount for the ‘Costco Wholesale’ signage. Likewise, Elevation 5 is the West elevation and is 36 square feet over the required amount for the ‘Costco Wholesale’ signage. Petitioner’s Justification: This deviation is required based on the signage exhibit enclosed, which provides the relief request for a total of 367 square feet over the required standard, respectively, for the combined amount. This signage square footage increase is commensurate with the size of the building face for increased visibility for promotion, orientation, and wayfinding. Additionally, no other signage, including pole signs, ground signs, projecting signs, or other per LDC Section 5.06.04, is proposed for this site except for the requested signage on the face of the building. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff reviewed this deviation request in a similar manner to how sign variances are reviewed. Staff suggested that the applicant respond to the LDC Sec. 5.06.08.B.1.a. through f. The applicant provided an elevation exhibit, which is included in Attachment A, Backup Package. However, the applicant stated that they will provide additional justification with the presentation at the scheduled hearings. Through a thorough staff review, the applicant reduced what was originally requested as an additional 903 square feet over the maximum down to 367 square feet, which included removing the one-store sign on the east façade of the building since this would be permanently facing residences. Staff determined that the east sign was unnecessary, and the applicant abided by removing it and reducing their extension request. The applicant’s request is based on a national standard signage program for Costco. Staff determined that all other signs show sufficiency, as they are all oriented towards the traveling public and visiting patrons. Therefore, Zoning Staff recommends APPROVAL. All six (6) deviations have been determined to be sufficient by staff reviewers; therefore, staff are supportive of all requested deviations. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The NIM was advertised and held at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 18, 2025, at the Florida Sports Park Reception Hall, located at 8520 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd, Naples, FL 34114. There is a copy of the transcript drafted by the applicant that includes the applicant’s presentation and the concerns of the attending public. Page 489 of 6526 PDI-PL20240011559, Costco Wholesale Page 14 of 14 June 17, 2025 The public expressed their concerns about the petition request, in no specific order: • More traffic along Rattlesnake Hammock Road • The gas station waiver application and its relation to the project • The decision to develop at the subject property • Impact on surrounding property values • Environmental impacts from the gas station • How the construction of the site will be managed • When will the delivery times be for supplies and products • Safety issues and emergency services There were 5 commitments made outside the request for the insubstantial change: • The gas station closes when the store closes, gas will not be a “24/7” operation • Number of fuel pumps is less than other stations, but will service up to 70 vehicles in queue • Loading for vehicles and trucks will be at night • Times for delivery will only be at night, away from the residences • Store is designed to serve 4,500 customers per day The applicant presented both the PDI and the ASW petitions at the NIM even though the NIM was only required for the PDI petition. A copy of the NIM advertising, summary, and the prepared presentation are included in the Backup Package, Attachment A. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward Petition PDI- PL20240011559, Costco Wholesale, to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of APPROVAL, subject to include the following attachments: Attachments: Attachment A – Backup Package Attachment B – Conceptual Site Plan Attachment C – Legal Ad and Sign Posting Attachment D – Revised Ordinance 22-18 Attachment E – Public Opposition Correspondences Attachment F – Public Support Correspondences Attachment G – Ord. 11-41 & Original Hacienda Lakes MPUD Rezone Findings Page 490 of 6526 Revised 5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information\Job Aides or Help Guides HEARING PACKAGE CHECKLIST Return this form with printed materials A. Backup provided by the County Planner The Planner is responsible for all required data included in the printed packets of information for the Hearing Examiner (Hex) or the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC). DO NOT ACCEPT DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. MAKE SURE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. PLEASE CONFIRM THE DOCUMENTS ARE IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED IN “BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT.” Planner responsible for providing the County Attorney-drafted Ordinance for PUDs and placing in backup materials. AGENTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE PUD DOCUMENT – STAFF PROVIDES THIS TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WHEN THE ORDINANCE IS DRAFTED FOR A PUD. THE FINAL PUD ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT. [FOR HEX, THE REQUESTED LANGUAGE/ PROPOSED PLAN IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT] B. Backup provided by Applicant: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED BELOW. DO NOT PROVIDE DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. PROVIDE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. IF THE BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT IS IN DISARRAY-MEANING IT IS NOT IN THE PROPER ORDER AND/OR THE APPLICANT PROVIDES MULTIPLE DUPLICATES-THE APPLICANT COULD LOSE ITS HEARING DATE. ____ Application, to include but not limited to the following: ____ Narrative of request ____ Property Information ____ Property Ownership Disclosure Form ____ Any other documents required by the specific petition type; such as a variance, a boat dock extension; PUD amendment, rezone request, etc. ____ Disclosure of Property Ownership Interest (if there is additional documentation aside from disclosure form) ____ Affidavit of Unified Control ____ Affidavit of Representation ____ Drawings (may include Cross-Section (for BDEs generally), proposed Boat Dock(s) with Water depth, location maps etc.) ____ NIM Information (Sign in sheet, notes, minutes and transcript/or summary) ✓ Include 3 thumbnail drives of video and/or audio ____ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) ____ Environmental Data ____ Historical/Archeological Survey or Waiver ____ Utility Letter ____ Deviation Justifications X X X X X X X X X X X X X X PL20240011559 (PDI Application) Page 491 of 6526 Revised 5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information\Job Aides or Help Guides ____ Boundary Survey ____ Other documents, as needed, on a case-by-case basis such as relevant prior Ordinances, Conditional Uses, historical documents, any “private or legal” agreements affecting the PUD etc. ___ Submerged Resource Surveys may be included here if required. ____ CD with only one pdf file for all documents in the same order as the packets are put together. They must be in the same order. I understand that by submitting the above materials, it is the agent ’s/applicant’s responsibility to ensure all materials are in the same order for all copies of backup materials to provide to the Hex/CCPC and the CD must contain the documents in one pdf file (not multiple files) in the same order as the printed materials. It is the agent’s responsibility to ensure no documentation is left out. ________________________________________ ____________________ Signature of Agent Representative Date ________________________________________ Printed Name of Signing Agent Representative X X Brad Wester June 17, 2025 N/A N/A (Electronic PDF file provided in lieu of CD). Page 492 of 6526 Insubstantial Change to PUD (PDI) 4/12/24 Page 1 of 4 Planning and Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.colliercountyfl.gov APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION DETAIL OF REQUEST Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.2 and shall require the review and approval of the Hearing Examiner or Planning Commission. The approval shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application. Name of Property Owner(s): Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: City: State: ZIP: Telephone: Cell: E-Mail Address: Name of Agent: Firm: Address: City: State: ZIP: Telephone: Cell: E-Mail Address: On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE to PUD (PDI) LDC Section 10.02.13 Chapter 3.E of the Administrative Code Need Help? GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides Page 493 of 6526 Insubstantial Change to PUD (PDI) 4/12/24 Page 2 of 4 PUD NAME: ORDINANCE NUMBER: FOLIO NUMBER(S): Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). If applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a legal description for subject portion. Yes No Yes No Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change. Does amendment comply with the G rowth Management Plan? If no, pl ease explain: Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If yes, in whose n ame? Has any portion of the PUD been SOLD and/or DEVELOPED? Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? Yes No If yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet. Page 494 of 6526 Insubstantial Change to PUD (PDI) 4/12/24 Page 3 of 4 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) Pre-Application Meeting notes Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes and why amendment is necessary Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy Revised Text and any exhibits PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance # Warranty Deed Legal Description of area of amendment Boundary survey, no older than 6 months, if boundary of original PUD is amended If PUD is platted, include plat book pages Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized Completed Addressing Checklist , no older than 6 months Property Ownership Disclosure Form Copy of 8 ½ in. x 11 in. graphic location map of site Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: •Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. •Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. Page 495 of 6526 Insubstantial Change to PUD (PDI) 4/12/24 Page 4 of 4 FEE REQUIREMENTS PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Utilities Engineering: Parks and Recreation: Emergency Management: Naples Airport Authority Conservancy of SWFL: Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Other: PUD Amendment Insubstantial (PDI): $1,500.00 Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00 Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 Same fee applies if the petition is referred to the Collier County Planning Commission, where the CCPC serves as the deciding authority instead of the HEX. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. Please submit the completed application online via GMCD Public Portal. If you need assistance submitting the application or help with payment online, please review the E-Permitting Guides and Online Payment Guide. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. Agent/Owner Signature Date Applicant/Owner Name (please print) Page 496 of 6526 1 of 3 Monday, October 14, 2024 at 15:53:56 Eastern Daylight TimeMonday, October 14, 2024 at 15:53:56 Eastern Daylight Time Subject:Subject:RE: Pre-Application Meeting PL20240011559 Costco Wholesale (SDP) Date:Date:Friday, October 11, 2024 at 4:51:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time From:From:Ray Bellows To:To:Brad Wester, Sean Sammon CC:CC:Maria Martinez, Lisa Blacklidge, Christine Willoughby Attachments:Attachments:image001.png, image002.png, image003.png, image004.png, image005.png, image006.png, CountyLogo-FullColor_948165c4-9665-41b4- 9162-fbb16abW557.png, Facebook_0522f546-5e75-4698-95f9-f15590a3defe.png, Instagram_a8da4774-4b5b-4ad1-8d23- 20e69b3b605d.png, X-Twitter_8d678efc-bd14-44ce-97cf-7fbab1003b00.png, Youtube_0078f7f1-7789-4afd-a015-50689fe1f99b.png, 311IconforSignature_87c558eb-83f5-449b-87c1-3cc5ac8b0859.png Good afternoon, Please be advised that the requested waiver from holding a preapplication meeting has been approved. Respectfully, Ray Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Telephone: 239.252.2463 Ray Bellows Manager - Planning Zoning Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov From:From: Brad Wester <BWester@drivermcafee.com> Sent:Sent: Friday, October 11, 2024 11:28 AM To:To: Ray Bellows <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc:Cc: Maria MarLnez <Maria.MarLnez@colliercountyfl.gov>; Lisa Blacklidge <Lisa.Blacklidge@colliercountyfl.gov>; ChrisLne Willoughby <ChrisLne.Willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject:Subject: FW: Pre-ApplicaLon MeeLng PL20240011559 Costco Wholesale (SDP) EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Ray, Good morning and hope all is well after the storm. Per below, I am seeking a waiver for our PDI pre-application review for the Costco Wholesale project. As you know we’ve had an oWicial pre-app in Jan and then another meeting with you and Sean late August on these matters related to the PDI and the ASW. There was some initial confusion on how to upload these into the portal. We’d like to commence with the oWicial submittals for review to start the process. Please let me know if we are authorized to proceed without a pre-app submittal. I’ve copied Maria on this per our original email this morning. Thanks. Brad Page 497 of 6526 2 of 3 From: From: Maria Martinez <Maria.Martinez@colliercountyfl.gov> Date: Date: Friday, October 11, 2024 at 11:21 AM To: To: Brad Wester <BWester@drivermcafee.com> Subject: Subject: RE: Pre-Application Meeting PL20240011559 Costco Wholesale (SDP) Hello Brad, I’m sorry for the confusion; the waiver request will be for the new SDP Pre-Application PL20240011559 (since the one you initially had was for the SDP as well ) and for the PDI. The original SDP Pre-Application was changed to ASW. ! Let me know if you have any questions. Respectfully, Maria Martinez Program Coordinator Operations & Regulatory Management Office:239-252-2906 Maria.Martinez@colliercountyfl.gov From:From: Brad Wester <BWester@drivermcafee.com> Sent:Sent: Friday, October 11, 2024 11:16 AM To:To: Lisa Blacklidge <Lisa.Blacklidge@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc:Cc: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>; Maria MarLnez <Maria.MarLnez@colliercountyfl.gov>; ChrisLne Willoughby <ChrisLne.Willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject:Subject: Re: Pre-ApplicaLon MeeLng PL20240011559 Costco Wholesale (SDP) EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Lisa and Ray, Good morning. Per the email below from Maria and my recent portal upload, I would like to request a waiver for the ASW pre-app review of this ASW for Costco Wholesale gas distance matter. We originally met in January to discuss the full scope of the project and required approval processes, which included a PDI and ASW. My team also met with Ray and Sean in late August to discuss further. Since then, my team has prepared each app, the PDI and ASW, and uploaded for review. Please let me know. Thank you. Brad From: From: Maria Martinez <Maria.Martinez@colliercountyfl.gov> Date: Date: Friday, October 11, 2024 at 10:34 AM To: To: Brad Wester <BWester@drivermcafee.com> Subject: Subject: Pre-Application Meeting PL20240011559 Costco Wholesale (SDP) Good morning, I am reviewing your request for a Pre-ApplicaLon meeLng for Costco Wholesale (SDP). We have noLced that a previous Pre-ApplicaLon meeLng was held for the same project type under PL20240000445, but the applicaLon type selected was Auto Service StaLon Waiver. Would you like to request a waiver from the Planning Manager for the meeLng, or do you want to proceed with the Pre-ApplicaLon meeLng for the SDP? Respec_ully, Page 498 of 6526 3 of 3 Maria Martinez Program Coordinator Operations & Regulatory Management Office:239-252-2906 Maria.Martinez@colliercountyfl.gov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Page 499 of 6526 Costco Wholesale PDI NARRATIVE SUMMARY OF REQUEST The request is for an Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) for relief from certain standards for the development of a new Costco Wholesale store and gas facility located generally at the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Drive and Collier Boulevard on approximately 25- acres, more specifically, Collier County Parcel ID Number 48586002021 (the “Property”) in the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). The MPUD was most recently amended in 2022 by way of Ordinance 22-18. The PDI is a request specific to the existing commercially designated Property within the MPUD. Page 500 of 6526 ORDINANCE NO. 2022- 18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 11-41, THE HACIENDA LAKES MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TO CHANGE THE BUSINESS PARK AND RESIDENTIAL TRACT LINES, REMOVE THE RV TRACT AND ADD ACCESS POINTS ALONG THE NORTHERN MPUD BOUNDARY; BY REVISING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; AND BY ADDING DEVIATIONS. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, CONSISTING OF 2,262+/- ACRES IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951) AT THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE-HAMMOCK ROAD AND NORTH AND SOUTH OF SABAL PALM ROAD IN SECTIONS 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24 AND 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, AND SECTIONS 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20210001791] WHEREAS, on October 25, 2011, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance No. 11-41, which created the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development MPUD"); and WHEREAS, Alexis Crespo, AICP of RVI Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. representing Toll FL XIII Limited Partnership, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the MPUD. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The MPUD Document attached as Exhibits "A" through "G" to Ordinance No. 11-41 is hereby amended in accordance with the revised PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through"G" and incorporated by reference herein. 21-CPS-02163/1715485/1]152 Isles of Naples-Hacienda PUDA 1 of 2 4/22/22 Page 501 of 6526 SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this aay of Al Gc i 2022. J ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTA - .eMlJ,,., CLERK COLLIER CO DA By: Ar, * • By: r bep Clerk Wil f.m L. McDaniel, Jr., Chairman Atte0.to Ct . ^1 signatt004,too Approved as to form and legality: V f lied with the 1/ This ordMortce 4f f e' 011 L' b otof fiate 5L Ahton-Cicko lY °f that Managing Assistant County Attorney and ackn°wted 7E daY 411tCAm4" received thisfiling of Attachments: Exhibit A —Permitted Uses Exhibit B —Development Standards Exhibit B-1—Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Project Location Map [Hex 2015-06] Exhibit B-2—Azure at Hacienda Lakes Project Location Map [Hex 2016-20] Exhibit B-3—Hacienda Lakes North Area Project Location Map Exhibit C —Master Plan Exhibit C-1—R/MU Access to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. and Southern Buffer Exhibit Project [Hex 2021-33] Exhibit C-2—Hacienda Lakes North Area-Enlargement of Master Plan Exhibit D —Legal Description Exhibit D-1—Hacienda Lakes of Naples Legal Description [Hex 2014-18 & 2015-06] Exhibit E —List of Requested Deviations Exhibit E-1—Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Project Location Map [Hex 2014-18] Exhibit E-2—Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Entry Sign Location Map [Hex 2014-18] Exhibit E-3—Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Entry Sign Plan and Elevation Hex 2016-20] Exhibit E-4—Hacienda Lakes North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit Exhibit F —List of Owner Commitments includes Master Mobility Plan Exhibit G —Master Use and Conversion List 21-CPS-02163/1715485/1 J 152 Isles of Naples-Hacienda PUDA 2 of 2 4/22/22 Page 502 of 6526 EXHIBIT A PERMITTED USES PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS TRACT TYPE UNITS. ACREAGE± TRACT"R" RESIDENTIAL 1,714 447.86 TRACT "R/MU" RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE 25 min.* 38.82 TRACT"BP" BUSINESS PARK 1 35.38 TRACT"C" COMMERCIAL 17 min.* 34.16 TRACT"A" ATTRACTION 1 47.27 TRACT"P" PRESERVE 0 1,544.14 TRACT"PF"PUBLIC FACILITY 0 1.33 TRACT"JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY 2 21.62 TRACT"ROW"PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 72.01 TRACT"S"SCHOOL 0 19.55 Total 1,760 2262.14 Denotes the minimum number of dwelling units that must be constructed in the associated land use tract. Given that Tract C may generate up to 55 residential dwelling units, thirty (30%) percent of those residential units (17 units)must be constructed in Tract C. Tract R/MU is required by this document to have no less than 25 residential dwelling units constructed within that Tract. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one-third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. GENERAL PERMITTED LAND USES Streets, alleys, water management facilities and structures, utilities and other infrastructure improvements are generally permitted anywhere within this MPUD except for in the P, Preserve Tract. II TRACT"R",RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 1,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi-family units are permitted in the entire PUD.No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi-family, as defined in the LDC. Residential units may be converted to senior housing units or recreational vehicle(RV) units, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion,the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B.Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure,or part thereof,shall be erected,altered or used,or land used,in whole or in part,for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family detached dwellings; 2. Zero lot line,detached dwellings; 3. Two-family and duplex dwellings; Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 1 of 79 Page 503 of 6526 4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 5. Multi-family dwellings; 6. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities.Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B.These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD; 7. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses,as determined by the BZA,by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including,but not limited to: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures,recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing, apartment rental,as well as resale and rental of units within the MPUD in perpetuity(group 6531); 3. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests; 4. Horse stables and related equestrian facilities to serve the PUD that complement the MPUD's proximity to the Picayune Strand State Forest may be allowed on residential lands lying east of the proposed north/south public roadway,subject to applicable permitting.This private,non-commercial,accessory use is intended for stabling for residents of the PUD.Horse racing,dressage, or horse jumping events open to the public are prohibited; 5. Private stables on single-family lots greater than 43,560 square feet in lot area,on residential lands lying east of the proposed north/south public roadway are permitted to allow one horse for each 21,780 square feet of lot area; 6. Horse trails. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 2 of 79 Page 504 of 6526 III Tract"RV": the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be ected altered o sed r land , ed i ..hele a part other then,the following• A. Principal Uses: 1. Recreational vehicle parks(Group 7033, recreational vehicle parks only), subject to the criteria co.,tai e.d i Exhibit D n d only in the loc tion .depicted "" Exhibit the entire MPl D Except., ,ifled herein, the All District shell .. ..1y with the Land Development Code(LDC)including Sections 2.03.03.F and 5.5.10. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in-this4and-use-tr-ast--ineludifig-swimming-peets—spas—deeks—lseat-heuses—aft€1 sereen-en,.l„ .. ire e atie al fa ilities de ed to a the de elopment; 2. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, bo r.dw lks playgro„n d playf:el,d ter, is courts n d r miler ten de.d to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests; IV III TRACT"R/MU",RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE PERMITTED USES: Up to I,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi-family units are permitted in the entire PUD.No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi-family as defined in the LDC. The residential units may be converted to senior housing units, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion,the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office related land uses are also allowed in this tract,less up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical related office land uses approved by plat or SDP in Tract C. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure,or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or uses,or and used, in whole or in part,for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family detached dwellings; 2. Zero lot line,detached dwellings; 3. Two-family and duplex dwellings; 4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 5. Multi-family dwellings; Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck thro„gh--are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 3 of 79 Page 505 of 6526 6. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities.Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses for the purposes of density,but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B.These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. 7. Drug Stores and Proprietary Stores(Group 5912). If this retail use is developed in the Ft/MU Tract then the square footage of gross floor area of this retail use shall reduce the square footage of gross floor area of retail uses permitted in Tract C.; 8. Health Services,(Groups 8011-8049, 8071-8072, 8082,and 8092- 8099); 9. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals("BZA") by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: I.Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures,recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing; 3. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD including clubhouses,health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests. IV TRACT"BP"BUSINESS PARK PERMITTED USES: Up to 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and a hotel of up to 135 rooms capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. However, if owner elects not to build a hotel on Tract C or BP,then the square footage limitation of business park land uses could be exceeded if a hotel conversion to business park of up to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area is used based on the land use conversions in Exhibit B. In place of the business park and hotel land uses,a school may be developed.If a hotel is constructed on Tract C or BP,based on an approved plat or SDP,then the hotel conversion shall terminate. Tract"BP"is located directly north of the Attraction Tract that accommodates the Swamp Buggy land uses and facilities. This acreage is meant to provide for a transition from the Attraction land uses to the Residential Tract and intended land uses further north. This Tract shall be permitted to be developed for either a business park or a school.If the Tract is developed as a school,only those uses permitted in Section XI shall be allowed. Should the 35.38 acre tract be proposed for development as a business park,no building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used,or land used, in whole or in part,for other than the following: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 4 of 79 Page 506 of 6526 A. Principal Uses: 1. Apparel and other finished products(groups 2311-2399); 2. Building construction(groups 1521-1542); 3. Business services(group 7311); 4. Communications(groups 4812-4899, including communication towers limited in height to 100 feet); 5. Construction: Special trade contractors(groups 1711-1799); 6. Depository and non-depository institutions(groups 6081,6082); 7. Drugs and medicines(groups 2833-2836); 8. Eating places (group 5812,not including fast foods, walk-up windows and drive- thru restaurants); 9. Educational services(groups 8221-8299); 10. Electronics and other electrical equipment manufacturing, indoor only (groups 3612-3699); 11. Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services (groups 8711- 8748); 12. Food manufacturing (groups 2034, 2038, 2053, 2064, 2066, 2068, 2096, 2098, 2099); 13. Furniture and fixtures manufacturing(groups 2511-2599); 14. Government offices/buildings (groups 9111-9222, 9224-9229, 9311, 9411-9451, 9511-9532, 9611-9661 ); 15. Health services(groups 8011-8049); 16. Industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment (groups 3524, 3546, 3571 -3579); 17. Industrial inorganic chemicals(groups 2833,and 2844); 18. Job training and vocational rehabilitation services(group 8331); 19. Leather and leather products(groups 3131-3199); 20. Measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks manufacturing(groups 3812-3873); Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words strusk4hfeugh-are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 5 of 79 Page 507 of 6526 21. Medical laboratories and research and rehabilitative centers (groups 8071, 8072, 8092, 8093); 22. Miscellaneous manufacturing industries(groups 3911-3999); 23. Motion picture production(groups 7812-7819); 24. Motor freight transportation and warehousing(group 4225,mini-and self-storage warehousing only),subject to the following criteria: i. The use of metal roll-up garage doors located on the exterior of the perimeter buildings and walls of buildings which are visible from a public right-of-way is prohibited; and ii. Access to individual units whether direct or non-direct must be from the side of the building that is oriented internally; iii. No building shall exceed 100 feet in length when adjacent to a residential tract within the MPUD; iv. No outdoor storage of any kind is permitted, and v. Storage units shall be utilized for storage purposes only. 25. Printing,publishing and allied industries(groups 2711-2796); 26. Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products(groups 3021, 3052, 3053); 27. Security/commodity brokers(group 6211); 28. Transportation equipment(groups 3714,3716, 3732, 3751, 3792,3799); 29. U.S. Postal Service(group 4311); 30. Wholesale trade durable goods(groups 5021, 5031,5043-5049, 5063- 5078,5091, 5092, 5094- 5099); 31. Wholesale trade non durable goods (5111-5153, 5181, 5182, 5191, except that wholesale distribution of chemicals,fertilizers,insecticides,and pesticides shall be a minimum of 500 feet from a residential tract within or abutting the MPUD,5192- 5193); 32. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses,as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Limited Principal Uses: The following uses shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the total acreage of the Business Park tract: 1.Business services (7312, 7313, 7319, 7331, 7334- 7336, 7342, 7349, 7352, 7361, no labor pools,7371-7384,7389); 2. Child day care services(group 8351); Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struclE-thr-eugli-are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 6 of 79 Page 508 of 6526 3. Depository and non-depository institutions(groups 6021-6062,6091,6099,6111- 6163); 4. Drug stores (group 5912, limited to drug stores and pharmacies) in conjunction with health service groups and medical laboratories/research/rehabilitative groups; 5. Hotels(group 7011) up to 135 rooms, capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. Hotel square footage does not reduce the business park square footage cap. If the hotel conversion is applied to Tract BP,then a hotel is not permitted; 6. Membership organizations (group 8611); business associations (group 8621); professional organizations(8631); labor unions and similar labor organizations; 7. Personal services(groups 7215-7231, 7241); 8. Physical fitness facilities and bowling centers(groups 7991, 7933); 9. Professional offices; insurance agencies(group 6411); insurance carriers (groups 6311-6399); real estate (6531, 6541, 6552, 6553); holding and other investment offices(groups 6712-6799); attorneys(group 8111 ); 10. Travel agencies(group 4724). C. Uses Accessory to Principal and Limited Uses: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right; 2. One(1)caretaker's residence within Tract BP,Business Park Tract, subject to the following: i. The residence shall be constructed as an integral part of the principal structure and shall be entered from within the principal structure. Exits required to comply with fire code shall be permitted; ii. The caretaker's residence shall be an accessory use and shall be for the exclusive use of the property owner,tenant,or designated employee operating or maintaining the principal structure; iii. Off-street parking shall be as required for a single-family residence. 3. For primary business park uses,retail sales and/or display areas as accessory to the principal uses shall not exceed an area greater than 20 percent of the gross floor area of the permitted principal use and is further subject to retail standards for landscaping, parking and open space. VI TRACT"C",COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail land uses and up to 70,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office uses reduced by medical-related retail use square footages approved by SDP in Tract R/MU and reduced by up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office land use square footages approved by plat or SDP in Tract R/MU.The 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office may be exceeded if the retail land uses are converted to office thereby reducing the retail square footage, not to exceed 25% of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 7 of 79 Page 509 of 6526 retail land use allocation.Additionally, a hotel of up to 135 rooms and up to 92,000 square feet of gross floor area shall be allowed in Tract C unless a hotel is developed within Tract BP or if the hotel use is converted to BP uses in Tract BP based on an approved plat or SDP. No building or structure,or part thereof,shall be erected, altered or used,or land used, in whole or in part,for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 2. Multi-family dwellings; 3. Residential land uses integrated into commercial buildings with residential units located above commercial land uses to create a mixed-use building; 4. Accounting,auditing and bookkeeping services(group 8721); 5. Adjustment and collection services(group 7322); 6. Advertising agencies(group 7311); 7. Advertising-miscellaneous(group 7319); 8. Amusements and recreation services, indoor (groups 7911-7922, 7991, 7993, 7999,only billiard parlors,bingo parlors,martial arts and yoga instruction,bicycle and golf cart rentals); 9. Apparel and accessory stores with(groups 5611-5699); 10. Auto and home supply stores(groups 5211-5261,and 5531); 11. Automotive dealers,not elsewhere classified(group 5599); 12. Automobile parking(group 7521),including garages-automobile parking,parking structures,no towing yards; 13. Automotive repair,services and parking(groups 7513 -7533, 7536-7549); 14. Barber shops(group 7241),except barber schools; 15. Beauty shops(7231), except beauty schools; 16. Boat dealers(5551); 17. Bookkeeping services(8721); 18. Bowling centers, indoor(7933); 19. Building construction-General contractors(groups 1521 - 1542); 20. Building materials,hardware and garden supplies(groups 5211-5261); Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck thro gl-are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 8 of 79 Page 510 of 6526 21. Business associations(group 8611); 22. Business consulting services(group 8748); 23. Business credit institutions(groups 6153-6159); 24. Business services(groups 7311-7353, 7359, except labor contractors, 7371-7379, 7381 except armored car and dog rental, 7382-7389 except auctioneering service, automobile recovery, automobile repossession, batik work, bottle exchanges, bronzing, cloth cutting, cosmetic kits, cotton inspection, cotton sampler, drive- away automobile,exhibits-building,filling pressure containers,field warehousing, fire extinguisher, floats-decoration, folding and refolding, gas systems, bottle labeling, liquidation services,metal slitting and shearing, packaging and labeling, patrol of electric transmission or gas lines, press clipping service, repossession service, rug binding, salvaging of damaged merchandise, scrap steel cutting and slitting,shrinking textiles,solvent recovery,sponging textiles,tape slitting,texture designers,textile folding,tobacco sheeting and window trimming service); 25. Cable and other pay television services(group 4841); 26. Senior housing for persons over age 55,limited to independent and assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities, and nursing homes. This housing is included in the retail square foot limitation and no greater than 450 senior housing units shall be developed in this entire MPUD; 27. Child day care services(8351); 28. Commercial printing(2752,excluding newspapers); 29. Civic,social and fraternal associations(group 8641); 30. Coin operated amusement devices,indoor(group 7993); 31. Communications (groups 4812-4841) including communications towers up to specified height,subject to LDC Section 5.05.09; 32. Construction-special trade contractors(groups 1711 - 1793, 1796, 1799); 33. Dance studios,schools and halls(group 7911); 34. Drug stores(group 5912); 35. Depository institutions(groups 6011-6099); 36. Eating and drinking establishments(group 5812,and group 5813)excluding bottle clubs. Outdoor amplified sound is prohibited; 37. Educational services(groups 8221, 8222, 8243 - 8249); Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 9 of 79 Page 511 of 6526 38. Engineering, accounting, research, management and related services (groups 8711-8748); 39. Food stores(groups 5411-5499); 40. Gasoline service stations(group 5541 subject to LDC requirements); 41. General merchandise stores(groups 5311,5331-5399); 42. Glass and glazing work(1793); 43. Health services(groups 8011-8049,8051-8059,8071-8072,8082 and 8092-8099); 44. Home furniture,furnishing, and equipment(groups 5712- 5736); 45. Hotels and motels (groups 7011, 7021, and 7041) only if a hotel is not built in Tract BP and the hotel conversion is not applied to Tract BP; 46. Insurance carriers,agents and brokers(groups 6311-6399,6411); 47. Landscape architects,consulting and planning(group 0781); 48. Legal services(group 8111); 49. Libraries(group 8231); 50. Management and public relations services(groups 8741-8743, 8748); 51. Membership organizations(8611-8699); 52. Membership sports and recreation clubs,indoor(group 7997); 53. Miscellaneous personal services(7291, 7299,debt counseling only); 54. Miscellaneous repair services(groups 7622- 7699); 55. Miscellaneous retail(groups 5912-5963, 5992-5999); 56. Motion picture theaters(group 7832); 57. Motorcycle dealers(group 5571); 58. Motor freight transportation and warehousing(group 4225 mini- and self-storage warehousing only); 59. Museums and art galleries(group 8412); 60. Non-depository credit institutions,and loan brokers(groups 6111-6163 ); 61. Offices for engineering,architectural,and surveying services(groups 0781, 8711- 8713); Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 10 of 79 Page 512 of 6526 62. Paint,glass and wallpaper stores(5231); 63. Passenger car leasing(group 7515); 64. Passenger car rental(group 7514); 65. Personal services(groups 7211,7212, 7215,7216 nonindustrial dry cleaning only, 7217, 7219, 7221-7251, no beauty or barber schools, 7261 except crematories, 7291,7299,excluding massage parlors,escort services,steam baths,Turkish baths and tattoo parlors); 66. Photographic studios(7221); 67. Physical fitness facilities(7991); 68. Political organizations(group 8651); 69. Printing,publishing, and allied industries(groups 2711,2721); 70. Professional membership organizations(group 8621); 71. Public Administration (groups 9111-9199, 9229, 9311, 9411- 9451, 9511-9532, 9611-9661); 72. Public or private parks and playgrounds; 73. Public relations services(group 8743); 74. Radio,television, and consumer electronics stores(group 5731); 75. Radio and television broadcasting stations(groups 4832,and 4833); 76. Real estate(group 6512, 6531-6552); 77. Record and prerecorded tape stores(group 5735),excluding adult oriented rentals and sales; 78. Recreational vehicle dealers(group 5561); 79. Religious organizations(group 8661); 80. Research,development,and testing services(group 8731-8734); 81. Retail nurseries,lawn and garden supply stores(group 5261); 82. Security and commodity brokers, dealer, exchanges and services (groups 6211- 6289); 83. Theatrical producers and miscellaneous theatrical services, indoor (groups 7922- 7929); Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 11 of 79 Page 513 of 6526 84. Tour operators(group 4725); 85. Travel agencies(group 4724); 86. United States Postal Service(4311 except major distribution center); 87. Veterinary services(groups 0742, 0752 excluding outside kenneling); 88. Videotape rental (7841),excluding adult oriented rental and sales; 89. Vocational schools(groups 8243-8299); 90. Any other commercial use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses and consistent with the purpose and intent statement of the district as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. A. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including,but not limited to: 1. Parking facilities and signage; 2. Eating/Picnic Area; 3. One(1)caretaker's residence within the C,Commercial Tract; 4. Child care, outdoor play areas. Where play areas are constructed as an accessory use to a permitted use,the following conditions shall apply: a. A minimum five-foot, six-inch high reinforced fence shall be installed on all sides of the play area which are not open to the principal structure; b. Ingress to and egress from the play area shall be made only from the principal structure,however an emergency exit from the play area shall be provided which does not empty into the principal structure; c. The play equipment shall be set back a minimum distance of five feet from the required fence and from the principal structure. 5. Kiosks,that are small separate structures,often movable and open on one or more sides,used as a newsstand,vending stall,or other conveniences,Individual kiosks shall not to exceed 200 square feet.; VII TRACT"A"ATTRACTION PERMITTED USES: No building or structure,or part thereof,shall be erected, altered or used,or land used,in whole or in part,for other than the following: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 12 of 79 Page 514 of 6526 A. Principal Uses: 1. "Swamp Buggy"race track(group 7948, swamp buggy track only); 2. County fair and similar expositions, including circuses, carnivals, and other recreation/entertainment activities; 3. Exhibition hall/community center; 4. Amateur soccer, softball, lacrosse, volleyball, football, and similar outdoor recreational sports and activities and shall not be limited in the number of occurrences; 5. Indoor target ranges,including archery; 6. Stock car, monster trucks, and motorized vehicle race track (group 7948, motorized vehicle race track only); 7. Motocross(including bicycle and motorcycle)race course(group 7948,motocross race course only); 8. Stadium, training, and practice facilities for professional baseball (group 7941). This use is allowed only if a Notice of Proposed Change or Substantial Deviation Application for Development Approval is processed in accordance with Section 380.06,F.S.,or any successor statute,and the Hacienda Lakes DRI is amended.If state law changes such that DRI review or other state review is no longer required then this provision shall terminate; 9. Administrative offices and supportive service facilities; 10. Any other use or structure that is comparable in nature to the foregoing and that is approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including,but not limited to: 1. Any accessory uses and structures that are incidental to and customarily associated with those uses permitted herein; 2. Onsite water management,utility, and service facilities; 3. Signs as permitted or required by the applicable Collier County Land Development Code at the time of application for construction permits; 4. Residential facilities (one (1) residential unit within the A, Attraction Tract) for housing of security personnel or caretakers whose work requires residence on the property; 5. Concessions,ticketing,bleachers,and other spectator-related facilities; Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 13 of 79 Page 515 of 6526 6. Picnicking and playground areas,as well as areas for camping that may be utilized only three days prior to,during, and three days after a major event weekend. C. Conditional Uses: 1. Fuel storage and related facilities. VIII TRACT"P"PRESERVE PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof,shall be erected,altered or used, or land used,in whole or in part,for other than the following: A. Principal Uses 1. Upland preserves; 2. Wetland preserves; B Accessory Uses and Structures Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including,but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, horse trails, shelters, viewing platforms, educational signs,and information kiosks; 2. Water management structures; 3. Archaeological sites and associated research of said sites. VIIIX TRACT"PF"PUBLIC FACILITY PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof,shall be erected,altered or used,or land used,in whole or in part,for other than the following: A. Principal Uses 1. Public safety facilities intended to provide emergency medical, ground transportation services. B. Accessory Uses Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures,including,but not limited to: 1. Parking facilities and signage; 2. Administrative offices and support service facilities; 3. Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 14 of 79 Page 516 of 6526 IX TRACT"JD"JUNIOR DEPUTY PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof,shall be erected,altered or used,or land used, in whole or in part,for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Open space and outdoor recreational uses, including, but not limited to hiking, biking,fishing,boating,camping,picnicking and nature trails; 2. Sporting and recreational camps; 3. Caretaker's residence, limited to two for the JD,Junior Deputy Tract. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including,but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, shelters, pavilions, viewing piers, viewing platforms, educational signs, kiosks, and docks or platforms for launching and mooring or storage of non-motorized vessels utilizing movable storage racks; 2. Covered camping pavilion(s)(i.e.:concrete,or similar hard surface,that is roofed, and may, or may not be enclosed with screen/plastic sheeting, or walls), which may include kitchen/cooking facilities, office and restroom facilities; 3. Passive parks and passive recreational uses; 4. Pervious roads, driveways,and pervious and/or impervious parking facilities; 5. Project identification and directional signage; 6. Water management structures; 7. Restrooms/bath houses; 8. Roofed or unroofed storage for maintenance and recreational equipment; 9. Fencing and security gates,which may include barbed wire; 10. Archery and air rifle range(s). XI TRACT"S" SCHOOLS PERMITTED USES: No building or structure,or part thereof,shall be erected,altered or used,or land used, in whole or in part,for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 15 of 79 Page 517 of 6526 1. Schools,public or private, including Educational Services(Group 82). B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including,but not limited to: 1. Educational facilities; 2. Parking facilities and signage; 3. Administrative offices and support service facilities; 4. Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures; 5. Recreational facilities. XII SIGNS: A. Seven on-premise,ground signs shall be permitted on property corners fronting on existing, proposed,or future public roadways as depicted and labeled"Boundary Marker"on Sheets 3 and 4 of the MPUD Master Plan Set. These ground signs shall be allowed in addition to other signage allowed by Section 5.06.00 of the LDC. Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development(See Exhibit E, Deviation#3). B. One real estate sign shall be permitted in the Commercial Tract for the purposes of marketing residential products within the MPUD. This additional real estate signage may be utilized by any of the developers of the residential communities within the MPUD(See Exhibit E,Deviation#6). C. The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain until new signage can be permitted in Tract C.(See Exhibit E,Deviation#7) D. Two entry signs along Collier Boulevard associated with the Hacienda Lakes-North Area shall be permitted to include multiple residential communities on a single sign to accommodate developments which share access to Collier Boulevard as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes—North Area Signage Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 2 of 2 (See Exhibit E,Deviations#14, 15, and 16). Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 16 of 79 Page 518 of 6526 EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GENERAL: Development of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code(LDC) and Growth Management Plan GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. Conversion of residential land use types are provided for below which may be utilized to apportion units to senior housing or recreational vehicle units relative to the mix of residential land uses within this MPUD and their relation to public facility impacts. Table I below, sets forth the development standards for residential land uses within the MPUD, including residential land uses that are required to be developed in Tracts C and R/MU. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Figures 1 thru 7 generally depict typical development standards for the various residential products. Table II below, sets forth the development standards for commercial land uses, senior housing units, and public facility land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table III below, sets forth the development standards for the business park land uses and school land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table IV below,sets forth the development standards for the Attraction land uses and Junior Deputy passive recreation land uses within the MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. The facilities and improvements that are depicted on Exhibit C,the MPUD Master Plan shall be considered conceptual in nature. The design, location, and configuration of land improvements shall be defined at either site development plan,or construction plans and plat approval(s). Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. MAXIMUM DENSITY AND INTENSITY: Residential Density: This MPUD shall be limited to 1,760 residential dwelling units(du)that equates to a density of 0.78 dwelling units per gross acre. The 1,760 residential units are either single- or multi-family units as defined in the LDC.No more than 1,232 multi-family units may be constructed in the entire PUD. Caretakers residences shall be deducted from the 1,760 unit allocation.A minimum of 25 residential units shall be constructed in the R/MU Tract,and a minimum of 17 residential units shall be constructed in Tract Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 17 of 79 Page 519 of 6526 C. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units)must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R,within one-third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS Residential Density: 1.0 residential unit equates to 290 RV units in the cntirc PUD),or 4 Senior Housing Units(not to exceed 450 Senior Housing Units in the entire PUD). Up to 1,232 of the total 1,760 residential units may be multi-family as defined in the Land Development Code. Commercial Intensity: Hacienda Lakes is intended to be developed with a mixture of commercial land uses that include 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail uses,50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office uses, 20,000 square feet of gross floor area of general office uses, 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and 135 hotel rooms. In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 PM Peak Hour Trips. Such maximum trip generation cap was developed based on 327,500 gross square feet of retail land uses,50,000 gross square feet of medical office land uses, 20,000 gross square feet of general office land uses, 140,000 gross square feet of business park land uses,a primary school with a contemplated enrollment of 919 students, 135 hotel rooms,not to exceed 92,000 gross square feet, 704 single-family units, and 1,056 multi-family units. However, the hotel shall not count against the 140,000 square foot cap associated with the business park. Should the BP Tract not be developed as a business park but be developed as a school facility (excluding Collier County School District public schools), such facility shall not exceed the maximum 140,000 gross square feet allowed in that Tract. The developer shall be allowed to convert retail land uses to office land uses at a one to one(1: 1)ratio,not to exceed 25%of the retail land use allocation,provided only if the converted use is an allowed use in the tract. The developer shall also be allowed to wholly convert the hotel development opportunity of 135 rooms not to exceed 92,000 square feet to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses. All existing land uses and facilities in the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts shall not count against the overall trip and land use cap. Senior Housing Intensity: The intensity of any senior housing project shall have a maximum Floor Area Ratio(FAR)of 0.60. The 1,760 dwelling unit cap is only intended to limit the number of single family and multi-family residential units, as those units are defined in the Land Development Code. The development may include in excess of 1,760 residential units if some are developed as senior housing units. With the exception of senior housing development in the C, Commercial Tract, senior housing units shall be developed through the conversion of residential land uses.Residential units shall be allowed for conversion to senior housing units based on the Land Use Conversion Factors, above. However, 1 single-family dwelling unit equates to 1 single-family style independent living units. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. Total Project Intensity: In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 pm Peak Hour Trips. Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing Senior housing may be composed of one or more types of care/housing facilities.These care/housing types are limited to independent living,assisted living,and skilled nursing units,each of which can have varying operational characteristics.The following characteristics of senior housing care units distinguish them from Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struckough are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 18 of 79 Page 520 of 6526 residential land uses, and all of the characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a senior housing care unit: a. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older; b. There shall be on-site dining facilities to the residents,with food service being on-site,or catered; c. Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents needs, including but not limited to medical office visits; d. There shall be an onsite manager/activities coordinator to assist residents,who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; e. An on-site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents. f. Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency; g. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. h. Lands described as Hacienda Lakes Tracts G and I and designated as R/MU on the Master Plan are subject to the following: One Hundred Percent(100%)of the units will be restricted to households with 80%Annual Median Income (AMI)or less. This restriction shall remain in place for no less than thirty (30)years from the date issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. In combination with the commitment to affordability,the following operational characteristics apply to this project: a. The facility shall be for residents 62 years of age or older; b. There shall be an onsite manger/ activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; c. An on-site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents; d. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. e. The TIS shall use ITE use code 252 Senior Living Attached due to the limited on-site services to better reflect projected trip generation. [HEX 2021-331 In addition to the above operational characteristics,the following site design characteristics apply to the Allegro at Hacienda Lakes project(lands described in PL20200001717): a. All principal structures on Tract I will be set back a minimum of 80 feet from the parcel boundary.[HEX2021-33.1 b. The one(1)dumpster external to the building on Tract I will be located on the east side of the principal structure and a minimum of 350 feet from the southern property line. The dumpster will be concrete block enclosure with gates and used for disposal of bulk household items only, such as furniture. Household refuse, such as food products, will be housed in trash compactors internal to the principal structure. IHEX2021-331 c. An enhanced 10-foot Type"A"buffer will be provided on Tract I along the portion of the southern property line adjacent to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes meeting the following minimum specifications: 1. Total of 44 trees comprised of 11 canopy trees and 33 sabal palms. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 19 of 79 Page 521 of 6526 2. Canopy trees shall be a minimum of 10 feet tall at the time of planting. 3. Sabal palm trees shall be a minimum of 15'-30' staggered height at time of planting grouped in clusters with a minimum of three (3) palms per cluster, 10 feet on center. HEX2021-331 d. Temporary construction fencing with a minimum height of five (5) feet shall be installed along the southern and eastern property lines throughout the duration of construction activities and shall include screen mesh fabric. JHEX2021-331 e. A 6-foot-tall earthtone (brown or beige) PVC fence shall be installed along the southern portion of the eastern property line as shown on Exhibit C-1. [HEX2021-331 f. All light fixtures/poles will be limited to a maximum height of 25 feet and will be "Dark Skies" compliant. Exterior wall lighting, on the buildings shall not be located above the second story.JHEX2021-331 g. On-site security measures shall include a recorded license plate reader at the entrance to the Allegro at Hacienda Lakes. All recorded data is private and confidential and will be provided to law enforcement upon their request.JHEX2021-331 h. The developer/operator agrees to provide a Resident Assurance Check-In Program materially consistent Florida Housing Finance Corporation requirements as referenced below: The developer will provide and use an established system of checking in with each resident on a pre-determined basis not less than once per day, at no cost to the resident. Residents may opt out of this program with a written certificate that they choose not to participate. HEX2021-33] Recreational Vehicle Park Criteria Any RV Park may be located in one location as generally depicted on Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan. This area shall be developed either with an RV Park or residential land uses, and not be a bination of'both The RV Park shall be limited to Clac A motorcoachcs only. In no instance shall greater than 290 Recreational Vehicle units be developed in the entire MPUD. The density of the RV Park shall not exceed 12 RV units for each acre of the development parcel not less than 20 acres]. The Lord's way shall be the principal access to Collier Boulevard(CR 951). A 25 foot Type C landscape buffer shall be located between any RV land use and adjoining residentially zoned or developed parcel. Sign Development Standards Boundary Markers shall be no greater than 15 feet in height,and shall not exceed 64 square feet of sign content area(See Exhibit E, Deviation#3). Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 20 of 79 Page 522 of 6526 Any signage proposed for identifying the on-site Swamp Buggy Attraction land use in the Commercial Tract may be illuminated and manually changeable so the traveling public may learn of upcoming events in the Attraction Tract. Any land uses permitted within the boundaries of the MPUD shall be considered on-site for the purposes of providing for signage within the Commercial Tract. Site Development,or Plat Approval At the time of each development order application subsequent to rezone approval,the developer or its successors and assigns shall submit a list of previously approved land uses (approved via site development plan,or plat),and the trips,commercial square footage and residential units consumed to date. Developer shall also provide to County a copy of its master list of land uses and converted uses for this PUD with each SDP or plat application in the form attached as Exhibit G. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck hrough are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 21 of 79 Page 523 of 6526 TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CLUB FSINGLETWOHOUSE/ SETBACK FAMILY ZERO LOT FAMILY/ TOWNHOUSE MULTI-FAMILY REC t9NAL DETACHED LINE DUPLEX DWELLINGS REATION aiE141Eb6 PARKS BLDGS Principal Structures Minimum Lot Area 4,800 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF 1,800 SF per lot 1 acre 10,000 SF 800 SF per per lot spaee/unit Minimum Lot Width 40' 35' 35'per lot 18'per lot or 150' N/A 3-51 unit 15'or1/4 15'or1/4 15'or1/4 15'or%z Minimum Distance From BH,BH, BH, 15'or%z BH, 15'or'A BH, BH, MPUD Boundary**whichever whichever whichever whichever is whichever is whichever a 3 greater.is greater. is greater. is greater. greater. is greater. 20',or 15' 20',or 15' 20',or 15' 20'or%z BH, Front Yard Setback with side with side with side 20' whichever is N/A 4424loadloadload garages garages garages greater. Side Yard 6'5'0'or 10' 0'or 6' 0'or 6' z BH N/A 3a 15'or%z BH, Rear Yard 15' 15' 15' 15' whichever is N/A S' greater From Preserve 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 251 Maximum Zoned Height 35' 35' 35' 45' 75' 40' 3441 Maximum Actual Height 42' 42' 42' 50' 85' 50' 3-5 Floor Area Minimum(SF) 1200 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 900 SF 750 SF N/A N/A Minimum Distance IS'or''/z Between Principal 12' 10' 12' 12' 1/4SBH SBH, Structures whichever is greater Accessory Structures Front SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Side SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Rear 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 10' SPS From Preserve 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 4-02- Minimum Distance Between Accessory 0'or 10' 0'or 10' 0'or 10' 0'or 10' 0'or 10'0'or 10' 4W Structures on same lot Minimum Distance Between Accessory and 0'or 10' 0'or 10' 0'or 10' 0'or 10' 0'or 10'0'or 10' 0'or 10' Principle Principal Structures on same lot Maximum Zoned Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 35' SPS SPS Maximum Actual Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 35' SPS SPS 15'or/ 15'or/ 15'or1/4 15'or1/4 15'or'/z BH 15'or%z BH 15'or BH Minimum Distance From BH BH BH BH whichever is whichever is whi MPUD Boundary**whichever whichever whichever greater greater whichever greaterisgreaterisgreaterisgreaterisgreater SPS: Same as Principal Structure LL: Lot Line BOC: Back of Curb Paseo: A pedestrian only access way to and from residences. N/A:Not Applicable BH: Zoned Building Height SBH: Sum of Building Heights Principal and Accessory Uses shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 22 of 79 Page 524 of 6526 General application of setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i.If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non-platted private drive,the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. iii. For corner lots, only one (1) front yard setback shall be required. The yard that does not contain the driveway/vehicular access to the residence shall provide 10' setback. This setback applies only to single family detached, zero lot line, and two family/duplex dwelling types with a maximum zoned building height of 35' within-the-Esplanade-at Hacienda Lalies-property, a lepicted on Exhibit B ,, and theAzur t a T , property,as depicted on Exhibit B 2, attached hereto.At the time of platting,intersections subject to the secondary front yard setback shall demonstrate compliance with sight distance triangles as set forth in LDC Section 6.06.05.f HEX 2015-06&HEX 2016-201 Notes: 1) Structures adjacent to a lake may have no setback from the lake maintenance easement. 2) Entrance features(i.e.:guard house,clock towers and colonnades)are limited in height to no greater than 35 feet in actual height. 3) Two or three story multi-family structures may have terraced setbacks. Terraced setbacks shall be measured from the ground floor exterior wall,as long as a minimum 15-foot building wall setback is provided as depicted in Figure 1 below. 4) For all residential units,garages shall be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk closest to the garage, except for side loaded garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth must be provided perpendicular to the sidewalk to prevent vehicles being parked across a portion,or all of the referenced sidewalk. 5) No residential buildings greater than 50 feet in actual height shall be permitted west of the Florida Power and Light easement. 6) Minimum distance between principal structures for multi-family dwellings shall be 20 feet for multi-family buildings where both buildings have a zoned height less than 35 feet, or 'h SBH for multi-family buildings exceeding 35 feet in zoned height, only for multi-family buildings within Azure at Hacienda Lakes,as depicted on Exhibit B-2,attached hereto.f HEX 2016-201 7) In the event the property is developed as a unified development with the San Marino PUD in the area west of the FPL easement, a zero-foot setback shall be allowed along the common property PUD boundary and no landscape buffer shall be required(See deviation#18). 8) Where the property owner in the San Marino PUD agrees to the elimination of a buffer east of the FPL Easement,a ten-foot setback shall be allowed along the common property PUD boundary and no landscape buffer shall be required(See deviation#18). Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 23 of 79 Page 525 of 6526 PROPERTY I WRACK H ja IL r r• "1 i n 0---T Figure 1 Terraced Setbacks PRESERVE S' MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY i STRUCTURE SETBACK 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE 1 1 iS' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL 1 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRMgPA1 I I STRUCTURE SETBACK STRUCTURE SETBACK ACC. SIR.' FROM PRESERVE 1 1 1 1 6' I 12' MIN. B' MIN. -.4^B' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL I 1 STRUCTURE SETBACK I PRINCIPAL I 23' MIN. STRUCTURE 1 1 1 1 FROM YARD PRINCIPAL I 1 FRONT YARD PRINCIPALNT STRUCTURE sETBACK ROW I 18'L. 2IINN.- 3 pN i STRUCTURE SETBACK S' SIDEWALK- L BACK OF CURB - 10' MIN. CENTERLINE_ - ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 2 Detached Single-Family Units Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 24 of 79 Page 526 of 6526 PRESERVE 3 5' MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY I(' 1 i 7 STRUCTURE SETBACK I 1 ------ 1---^__ 18' MM. REAR YARD PRINCIPALFROMPRESERVEIT17STRUCTURESETBACK25FOOTMINIMUMEPSICKSTRUCTUSETELAC \ ( SIR.I FROM PRESERVE I I I I I I I 10' MIN. J ___I0' MIN. I- 10' MIN. I.-0' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL 1 I STRUCTURE SETBACK I I PRINCIPAL I 23' MIN. I11 1 FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL I r- I — ITT FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK I II STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 1_ 1N. IROW mr 5' SIDEWALK— BACK OF CURD 10' MIN. CENTERLINE--.-1— - ACC. STR. .. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 3 Detached Single-Family/Zero Lot Line Units PRESER4E B'U .REAR YARD ACCESSORY I_..r 1._,n ..s_ --_- --- S11 NCIURE SRTBACK TO FOOT WINYUM ACCESSORY 7- I--_ 1 STRUCFFTURE SMACK PRESERVE i I 1I II I 15'MN.REM YARD PRINCIPAL 25 FOOT PR1 ASTRUCTUREL- 1 f STNVCTURE SETBACK ACC. STR ACC. STR. FR7M PRESEAVE I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1T NO SIDE YND RWURED FOR I 6'N AN. I 4--12' YM1. I t VT PRNICFAL UNITS I I I I I I -23' YIN. I I STRUCRE r W.j S NiRl1C a TAROSflTiMCKPMNCIPK I I I I I I 1 I I I FAINT YARD PRoc,AL^L-.1_,j_t1 I 4_j J--IRONf YMD PRINCIPAL S1RUC1tIRE SETBACK 1 1 12y1s t 1 STRUCTURE SETBACKi 5' _ I ` IS _ _ I 1 .". _ _ _.-J BACK of CURB N. CENTERLINE ACC. STR. -ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE Nor DRANN PROPORTONMLY Figure 4 Duplex and Two-Family Units Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 25 of 79 Page 527 of 6526 PRESERVE a MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 O FOOT P I I 1,/ 15ST' NIA.RREAR YARD E SETBACK PINPALFRONIf1 II25FOOTMINIMUMPRIKPAL— I I I 1 A...." SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL ED FOR DTS STR FRO&PRESERVE DIN I I I 1 srR 12' I MIN. RE SETBACK rPEALSTRUCTURE 5' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL STRl1CTURE SETBACK I II FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK I I I 1 1 I I ROW 5' SIDEWALK-- BACK OF CURB I 1 I < I 10' MIN. CENTERLINE ACC.STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 5 Attached Single-Family and Townhouse Units PP6OR( r W.RUN! CSl) rs12INTP4 1ccC11NAtmoRI atTatat TEXT UN 10 FOOT WY 1 IIM t^' `/../s%J,/-Gti/` SORICIAMSTICAMY 1 1 RU11 YMO 26 FOOT IAIAIANI ACC.STIL ACC.a,- I I AL WWI TNON 1 019 2c__ I 1K=AI[R211110 1/2 XI°NOWT WPM SOS YAM PROICIPA, PRINCIPAL IIMNCRAK SCIINCK SRRICTUK S[1SAOt TRACT LINC- RI TAN)PIS#AI.K \\\RIM I STPNCRAK SMACK tt 1' ACCCSS TAW NT/NOT* S'SA701WA— Mbt Or w A. .w._ .i _., CO/RIRINE E NCO.RN..ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT 10 SCALE NOT MANE MICeornO$ULY Figure 6 Multi-Family Units Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL2O21OOO1791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 26 of 79 Page 528 of 6526 TABLE II COMMERCIAL,INCLUDING MIXED USE BUILDINGS,PUBLIC FACILITY,AND SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM LOT 25 FEET OR 'A THE 10 FEET BOUNDARY) BUILDING HEIGHT, WHICHEVER IS GREATER*** MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD 25 FEET 10 FEET BOUNDARIES **** PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN.DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FT. OR'h THE SUM OF 10 FEET BUILDING HEIGHTS* MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET***** 25 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 60 FEET***** 30 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA—COMMERCIAL 600 SQUARE FEET**N/A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA-SENIOR HOUSING 350 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA-PUBLIC FACILITY 1,500 SQUARE FEET N/A MIN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT 600 SQUARE FEET** 80 SQUARE FEET** Whichever is greater Not applicable to kiosks General application for setbacks:Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way,the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non-platted private drive,the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. Principal and Accessory Structures shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer. except that a hotel,destination resort,senior housing or mixed use building may be up to 75 feet in zoned height and 85 feet in actual height. Note:Any independent living unit proposed for development in a single-family type of configuration shall comply with the development standards for single-family land uses set forth in Table I. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 27 of 79 Page 529 of 6526 TABLE III BUSINESS PARK AND SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 8,000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 80 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS(MEASURED FROM TRACT 50 FEET*** 10 FEET BOUNDARY)-BUSINESS PARK MINIMUM YARDS(MEASURED FROM TRACT 50 FEET*** 25 FEET BOUNDARY)-SCHOOL MINIMUM YARDS(MEASURED FROM MPUD N/A N/A BOUNDARIES)-BUSINES PARK 50 FEET 10 FEET MINIMUM YARDS(MEASURED FROM MPUD 50 FEET 25 FEET BOUNDARIES)-SCHOO L PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN.DISTANCE BETWEEN 15 FT.ORY2 THE SUM OF 10 FEET STRUCTURES-BUSINESS PARK BUILDING HEIGHTS * MIN.DISTANCE BETWEEN OR 18 FEET 10 FEET STRUCTURES-SCHOOL MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT-BUSINESS PARK 35 FEET 35 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT-SCHOOL 50 FEET 50 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT-BUSINESS PARK 50 FEET 35 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT-SCHOOL 60 FEET 60 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA-BUSINESS PARK 1000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA-SCHOOL OR 350 SQUARE FEET 35 SQUARE FEET MIN.GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT BUSINESS PARK 500 SQUARE FEET 80 SQUARE FEET SCHOOL N/A N/A Whichever is greater General application for setbacks:Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i.If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non-platted private drive,the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. The Lord's Way Access Improvements: In the event that Tract BP is developed as a business park, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer with roadway facilities as depicted by LDC Appendix B-4, a Commercial/Industrial typical Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 28 of 79 Page 530 of 6526 roadway section, prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for a business park land use. In the event that Tract BP is developed as an educational facility, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer as depicted by LDC Appendix 8- 3, a Local Street typical roadway section. TABLE IV ATTRACTION AND JUNIOR DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 1 ACRE N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS(MEASURED FROM 20 FEET,PLUS 1 FOOT FOR 20 FEET TRACT BOUNDARY) EACH 2 FEET OF BLDG.HT. OVER50 FEET MINIMUM YARDS(MEASURED FROM 25 FEET 20 FEET MPUD BOUNDARIES PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN.DISTANCE BETWEEN 15 FT.ORY2 THE SUM OF 10 FEET STRUCTURES BUILDING HEIGHTS* MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET 50 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 75 FEET 75 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1000 SQUARE FEET** N/A Whichever is greater Not applicable to modular units,trailers,towers,camping pavilion,and similar structures to support the utilization of the attraction facilities,which have no minimum floor area limitations Parking for Junior Deputy:Required parking for the JD designated areas of the MPUD shall be calculated at the rate of one parking space for each 1000 square feet of covered camping pavilion. Junior Deputy Target Orientation: Archery and air rifle ranges shall be oriented for a line of fire only to the east, or north, and shall have a back stop that shall be comprised of absorbing materials such as an earthen berm, hay bales, or similar treatments, each installed according to industry standards, to prohibit projectiles from exiting the range area. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struckeugh-are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 29 of 79 Page 531 of 6526 Approved by HEX Decision 2015-06 B_I Exhibit B ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES Page 3 of 3 PROJECT LOCATION MAP F NORTH APhhiN kiv 11 7 e 1111111 t L_s_ r\i__,_______ 4 PROJECT, to DRI SITE __,BOUNDARY) 22 it 20C p C__....- n 1___ 24 II . 1"Lia 0 1,..)4 1-7- illk r" Page 532 of 6526 i I Exhibit "1" Approved by HEX Decision 2016-20 Page 3 of 7 EXHIBIT B-2 AZURE AT HACIENDA LAKES PROJECT LOCATION MAP i N_— 1 ! NORTH 3t -, a 7in y f 1 a p a L.. PROJECT LOCATION i RATTL U xoc DRI r. y CR-8S4 a— ' i zGfir BOUNDARYglgr4 • I U R SABAL PAL RJ J 1I 1 i k1 Y Page 533 of 6526 EXHIBIT B-3 HACIENDA LAKES NORTH PROJECT LOCATION MAP I NORTH PROJECT 14, SITE 11 DR!/PUD jBOUNDARY C lip r/ y, ryLi a: p 13 18 THE LORDS WAY j/ a U o w• RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD j/ 100-/ jopoInUi, /jj % . / w i.-1,' 4'::\1):_, 0.„„,,,,„„ f., 3„,„,„kl,01-1,„,,,,,;.„..,,,;,,/j JOHNS ROAD I 112 k U CS o z \rz._ 10 W 2; 2 701. 30/ r x ITj A ...t/1/ i ii,ip,,,,, a , 34 dAb , Z0 itI 36 31 32 U PREPARED FOR: FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHROIZATION#8636 hI WALDROP0oSECTION: 14 TOWNSHIP:50 RANGE:e Brothers ENGINEERING cocv CIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREAMERICA'S LUXURY HOME BUILDER' COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA 24201 WALDEN CENTER DRIVE,SUITE 204 1-3 BONITA SPRINGS,FLORIDA 34134 FILE NAME: 1284100E I5 28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE•SUITE 305 O BONITA SPRINGS,FL34135 P:239-405-7777 F:239405-7 899 g PHONE:(239)596-6600 m SHEET: 1 OF 1 EMAIL InfoBwaldropenglnnnCing.com Page 534 of 6526 i - w t Exhibit C2t. if= RtcooR w,arw.rb r.> 2 *A " ; ---- - NQ g v:I o o Rz i1Ao g P. (i I e1.I 1; '; - Z) 'IVm€ t L nmt Ili l Il t011 veil'. W i' 1; Z9' 1,ti4i Ii 9 1 I, I Pi I i a= w jai : 7eItea II.,. I 0 a , 1 1 1 r A •n •• ry e > DD J 6 p Ii joai .' ; 4 ; 1 , - IA ril 3jsi i aa r t € Yk 1, ,:- ilqiii jlirIli tiii3! 11 la-- ri, li 1 1 TI ' 1- . gf II N 1 r f its/ J i 94 s ! i 3 1P 1 1; r.R 1illi 4i g g e i;as ° . ' u - it. x i kg E Y 6 1.1i pj r §e ;kRt filgMilL 3 MiNal_lg11 3e ,- pi "pi '--le-' r xi ii's^ Ra il:s vi-x Pliiiiii r g e as-s 4 d]; Ei° S , i e E;3:+.:1 as 3$x ,5 R-v rR °lx e ¢ , gkvA i6 E p p H H e @ xl '412i.! iA rx;a $ I i # a Ni Rh3 R " 0- p o 3 i i 3 ;S 3E R ' dd l RR `a q ! - aQ a 2y a 1 5,g,- Rag t iv. 7 1 .-`g a!• ka y R3Gl, I j l 6 Suaits t YY e$'] a: F. § i 01 g.! R 5ixi tvi 3:0 as tii. A.; CUF184Ra iq TkR,' { a."I:, ...,. ax gxggi!t - R s gl 1.0Ag! 2Ri rro e-.`_rs; A "r+ I =9! !Y INC HACIE;VDALAKES OF'APLES,LLC HACIENDA LAKES 1?\ATA c vr eadm r, OVERALL MPL'D/DRI NSUL N :1+{t ; MPUD/DR/i VV a,twat p MASTER PLANPage 535 of 6526 LAND USE SUMMARY W 1{ 'J Z I DESIGNATOR LAND USE ACREAGE W 6! COMMERCIAL 34.160 ACRES I COMMERCIAL LANDS ENCUMBERED BY PUBLIC ROW TRACT"2.51S ACRES N - Z 11 A' ATTRACTION 447.BA ACRERESIDENTIAL147.BBt ACRES BUSINESS PARK 35.38s ACRES P PRESERVE 1546.11S ACRES qq PUBLIC FACIUTY 1.33O ACRES 1 JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY 2162U ACRES t P' S" SCHOOL 19.55*ACRES PRESERVE R/MU' RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE 38.82U ACRES TRACT ROW PUBLIC ROW/EASEMENTS 70,04s ACRES TOTAL 2262.14m ACRES V) THE COMBINED TOTAL OF THESE TWO ACREAGES EQUALS THE ACTIVITY CENTER ACREAGE OF 3S.BT EXCLUDE THIS ACREAGE WHEN TOTALING PROJECT AREA AS IT IS INCLUDED IN THE A AGRICULTURE y A. -'- ROW'TRACT UNDEVELOPED WILLOW RUN SPUD YL a LEGEND 1 A - ATTRACTION TRACT IL BP - BUSINESS PARK I R ^ IICC.yy Il ,1 R G - COMMERCIAL WM L R / Ra R LRLLUWRUN RPuo P - PRESERVE TRACT O R /1 VOTF re ,. PF - PUBUC FACILITIES TRACT(EMS) 4 R P JD 5j PRESERVE JUNIOR DEPUTY FIRST/ ANNIST IES PUD 3e i:AC. R O TRACT s - SCHOOLS MIrvISnIFS PGD R RESIDENTIAL TRACT L -'..-•RAW - RESIDENTIAL I MEDICAL USE ROW PUBLIC ROW/EASEMENTSumu.J OTw P; , AceEwAr o r PROPOSED PUBIC R.0 W. 1 PW AENST O PB SERVE.- OEVEI OPED RESERVATION I 1 3-.1.,iERELOCATED OR EXISTINGACCESSEASEMENTSNOT V/DEVEOPES TP r " PROPOSED FOR VACATION 1 e300 M N AAORCA URE MMEAaunR MUNP['vi oa UNCEVElOPED AAORICULi-E 3NAmmocs 1.11,10 JD M1 NOEVELOPED CODER 6.11109,111. RUTTLESNA c xT S. L 1211M RNTAI RFB' i o 11. Riip PRESERVE r O D 0RAW fL/fr4 1 L j J ) MAST urnioeiEi o y = _ km.. MATCH LINE-SEE SHEET] FT"^ 11' Page 536 of 6526 L s r MATCH LINE-8EE SHEET 1 COLLIER REGIONAL R r r r _, z 1 SMEDICALCENTERPUDAAAC= U r r 11 L I L / uN RIcuLTUREDRR R R I Y^ r_ DEVELOPED A W3r RAAU l I Z G SOLE-FFAMILY yJ 5 HOMES AND PRIVATE A rel ei I. r - •Pi NURSERY uses —AMAOR..TWE p H p DLEfAMILY I. eRESERVB 3-RPUO ROLNEOOE I HOMES AND PRIVATENURSERYUSES - _ r YT _ AaORICULTURE 4UNDEVELOPED wwu r jjgg PRE P S RYE- r g G' TRACT.•• r _. __ _ _ DABAL PALM ROAD t r r r A AGRICULTURE CYPRESS(DRS DEVELOPED D P LAND USE SUMMARY r UNDEVELOPEDOPEDED L1 eDESIGNATORLANDUSEACREAGEr COMMERCIAL 51.tSa ACRES Q O. COMMERCIAL LANDS ENCUMBERED BY PUBLIC ROW TRACT"2.51a ACRES N ATTRACTION 42211 ACRES r r UFO RESIDENTIAL 441BBa ACRES BP BUSINESS PARS 3.ba ACRES FI r •••' r AADRIg1lTWE AAGRICULTURE fTlPRESERVE15M.1.ACRES naY r UNDEVELOPED UNDEVELOPED F PUBLIC FACILITY 1.ACRES 1 LAD'JUNIOR DEPUTY 2182a ACRES q.ittat:4110.* r I 1 SCHOOL 1a55a ACRES W.U. RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE 3B.824 ACRES WOW PUBLIC ROW/EASEMENTS 20011 ACRES r Tar TOTAL net.11:ACRES P ARCpEL PEAEA S RRESERVE r UNDEVELOPEDE dRE...•.L AT" L OF THESE TWO ACREAGES EQUALS THE ACTIVRYCENTER j r Tdr — T TH i t ROW TRACT ACREAGE OF 36 67 EXCLUDE THIS ACREAGEWHENTo NGPROJECTAREAAS T SINCLUDEG N E 1_ _ _ a - - D A • ATTRAGOrNON TRACT , r r r r r _ PRESERVE', TRACT 9 o • BUSINESS PARR r ma R • PREeERVETM AGRICULTURECT JI AAORIC1URE AAGRCULTURE jy RP • PUBLIC FACILITIES TRACT(EMS1 UNDEVELOPED UNDEVELOPED{ Sa • SCNHOOLSEPUTY IOR TUL RACT ROW PUBLIC PIL ITEA9 EL E IIIIStir EASEMENTS r I I REeERYATAN ROW 11 I J PROPOSED FOR VACATaN 1 Page 537 of 6526 5 fil %!HACIENDA LAKES NATIVE PRESERVE SUMMARY Z k ' yyDESCRIPTIONTOTALURBAN(AC) RURAL(AC) IL Si 81 PROJECT AREA 2262.14 625.07 1637.07 MAXIMUM DENSITY AND INTENSITY Z ` 4ON-SITE NATIVE VEGETATION 1721.97 29538 1426.59 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY:THIS MPUD SHALL BE UMITED TO 1,780 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING GZ L4I LEES THE NATIVE WO WITH.RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK MI 2.02 2.02 0.00 UNITS(DU)THAT EQUATES TO A DENSITY OF 0.78 DWELLING UNITS PER GROSS ACRE.THE 2 ' I1,760 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE EITHER SINGLE ORLESSTHENATIVEVEGWITH. LORDSTHE WAY EXT. 0.42 0.42 000 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS AS DEFINED IN THE 4!J iiLOC.NO MORE THAN 1.232 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE ENTIRE PUD. 1LESSTHENATIVEMIWITH.04 THE 8ENf1ELO ROADCORRIOOR 11.00 5.01 5.93 CARETAKERS RESIDENCES SHALL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE 1,780 UNIT ALLOCATION.A 1. LESS THE NATIVE V60 WITH.ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVES 6.07 1.06 5.02 MINIMUM OF 25 RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE R/MU TRACT,AND A NATIVE VEGETATION FOR REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS 1702./6 286.87 14IS 64 MINIMUM OF 17 RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN TRACT C.THE BALANCE OF THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS GENERATED FROM TRACT C(13 UNITS)MUST BE PERCENTAGE FOR REQUIRED NATIVE PRESERVE 25%CONSTRUCTED IN EITHER THE RAIL/TRACT,OR ON A PORTION OF TRACT R.WITHIN 8• REQUIRED NATIVE VEGETATION 921.09 71. 71 949.38 ONE-THIRD OF ONE MILE OF THE BOUNDARY OF TRACT C PRESERVED NATIVE VEGETATION•• 1395.35 40.81 1354. 54 LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS COMPENSATING NATIVE PRESERVEI'+.MT DEPlaT1•• 61.80 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY:1.0 RESIDENTIAL UNIT EQUATES TO 4 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS(NOTTOTALPRESERVEAREA1546.11 53.06 1493.05 TO EXCEED 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN THE ENTIRE PUD).UP TO 1,232 OF THE TOTAL 1,760 RESIDENTIAL UNITS MAY BE MULTI-FAMILY AS DEFINED IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. NATIVE PRESERVE REQUIREMENT(LDC SUBSECTION 2.05.02 B.2.G.II.)OF SO%WITHIN COMMERCIAL INTENSITY: HACIENDA LAKES IS INTENDED TO BE DEVELOPED WITH A THE RFMUD SENDING LANDS EXCEEDS 60%OF THE TOTAL PROJECT RFMUD MIXTURE OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES THAT INCLUDE 327,500 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS SENDING LANDS.THEREFORE,OVER 80%OF THE TOTAL PROJECT RFMUD SENDING FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL USES,50,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF MEDICAL 0...1 LANDS SHALL BE THE REQUIRED RURAL NATIVE VEGETATION AREA OFFICE USES,20, 000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF GENERAL OFFICE USES, X COMPLIANCE WITH LDC SUBSECTION 3.05. 07 H.1.A.,REQUIRES NATIVE VEGETATION 140,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BUSINESS PARK LAND USES,AND 135 Q PLANTING ENHANCEMENT OF A MINIMUM OF 12.24 ACRES OF THE PROJECTS URF HOTEL ROOMS. SUBDISTRICT PRESERVE TRACT.COMPLIANCE WITH 100%OF THE NATIVE IN NO EVENT SHALL THE PROJECT EXCEED 3,328 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS.SUCH MAXIMUM PIFCjy iVEGETATIONPRESERVATIONREQUIREMENTSHALLBEACHIEVEDTHROUGHTRIPTLLANDGENNDAUSE CAP WAS DEVELOPED BASED OFO 327,500DICA OFFICEROSS SQUARE S.25ET OFPRESERVINGRFMUDPROJECTNATIVEVEGETATIONINANAMOUNTTWOTIMESTHE RETAIL USES,50,000 GENERAL SQUARE FEET MEDICAL LAND USES,20,000 DEFICIENT NATIVE VEGETATION PRESERVE ACREAGE IN THE URF SUBDISTRICT GROSS SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE LAND USES,140,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PARK LAND USES,A PRIMARY SCHOOL WITH A CONTEMPLATED ENROLLMENT OF F M PROJECT LANDS AS IS PROVIDED FOR THROUGH THE ADOPTED GMP AMENDMENT. 919 STUDENTS,135 HOTEL ROOMS,NOT TO EXCEED 92,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET,704 USINGLE-FAMILY UNITS,AND 1,058 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS.HOWEVER,THE HOTEL SHALL NOT MPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES: COUNT AGAINST THE 140,000 SQUARE FOOT CAP ASSOCIATED WITH THE BUSINESS PARK. SHOULD THE BP TRACT NOT BE DEVELOPED AS A BUSINESS PARK BUT BE DEVELOPED AS A SCHOOL (EXCLUDING COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS), SUCH 1. VMTHIN THE MPUD BOUNDARIES THERE WILL BE A MINMUM OF 60%USEABLE FACILITY SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM 140,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET ALLOWED IN OPEN SPACE. THAT TRACT. 2. THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PUD MASTER PLAN SHALL THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE ALLOWED TO CONVERT RETAIL LAND USES TO OFFICE LAND 7 BE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. USES AT A ONE TO ONE(1: 1)RATIO,NOT TO EXCEED 25%OF THE RETAIL LAND USE 3. THE DESIGN,LOCATION,AND CONFIGURATION OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS, ALLOCATION PROVIDED ONLY IF THE CONVERTED USE IS AN ALLOWED USE IN THE TRACT. LAKES,AND/OR ENTRY POINTS SHALL BE DEFINED AT EITHER SDP OR THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE ALLOWED TO WHOLLY CONVERT THE HOTEL DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL. OPPORTUNITY OF 135 ROOMS NOT TO EXCEED 92,000 SQUARE FEET TO 80,000 SQUARE I 4. IF THE ROAD EASEMENTS IN THE PETITION PL20210002887 ARE VACATED BY THE FEET OF BUSINESS USE LAND USES. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,THEN THESE ACCESS CONNECTIONS ARE ALL EXISTING LAND USES AND FACILITIES IN THE ATTRACTION AND JUNIOR DEPUTY TRACTS ALLOWED.IF THE PETITION FOR VACATION IS NOT APPROVED,THEN THESE SHALL NOT COUNT AGAINST THE OVERALL TRIP AND LAND USE CAP. SENIOR HOUSING INTENSITY:THE INTENSITY OF ANY SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT SHALL ACCESS CONNECTIONS ARE NOT ALLOWED. HAVE A MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO(FAR)OF 0.80.THE DWELLING UNIT CAP IS ONLY I 5. SEE EXHIBIT C-2 FOR NORTH AREA DEVIATION LOCATIONS. INTENDED TO UMIT THE NUMBER OF SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS IAS THOSE UNITS ARE DEFINED IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.THE DEVELOPMENT MAYINCLUDEINEXCESSOF1,780 RESIDENTIAL UNITS IF SOME ARE DEVELOPED AS SENIOR HOUSING UNITS.MATH THE EXCEPTION OF SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN THE C COMMERCIAL TRACT, SENIOR HOUSING UNITS SHALL BE DEVELOPED THROUGH THEY CONVERSION OF RESIDENTIAL LAND USES.RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR 11110." IeormemnrmmemmrICONVERSIONTOSENIORHOUSINGUNITSBASEDONTHELANDUSECONVERSIONFACTORS ABOVE HOWEVER,1 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT EQUATES TO 1 SINGLE-FAMILY STYLE I INDEPENDENT LAVING UNITS.IN NO INSTANCE SHALL GREATER THAN 450 SENIOR HOUSING 1 UNITS BE DEVELOPED IN THE MPUD. TOTAL PROJECT INTENSITY IN NO EVENT SHALL THE PROJECT EXCEED 3,328 PM PEAT( f HOUR TRIPS. 4 Page 538 of 6526 te*LEGEND 41-III. INGRESS/EGRESS Approved by HEX Decision 2021-33 NORTH 9 LAKE r . ' PROJECT AREA=6.71±ACRES TRACT"C"=COMMERCIAL NOT TO SCAI F TRACT"R/MU"=RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE 14.. TRACT"R"=RESIDENTIAL RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD l'i.' /'''—---:"------ --__ /- ''; lb Mr_ A I ,„:„ Y,, 1 TRACT 1 R/MU" I 1 i TRACT rc,,7 A Ar C " '1,7/-7 r'-i' v WAY j 1 TRACT iffs0/0011° c- COLLIER REGIONAL PALACIO MEDICAL CENTER TERRACE PALACIO NORTH TERRACE WEST I I I HACIENDA LAKES MPUD EXHIBIT C-1: R/MU ACCESS TO I/\I A AlumMRATTLESNAKEHAMOCKROADI/\I ENGINEERING PREPARED FOR:SECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: COLLIER COUNTY ovAENGINEE.NG I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC 23 50 26 FLORIDA 213100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE•SUITE 305 7742 ALICO ROAD REVISION DATE: 11/11/2020 P:2 BONITA SPRINGS.FL 3413539-405-7777 F:239405-7899 FORT MYERS,FLORIDA 33912 SHEET:I OF 1 EhlAIL:191:20waJdropengineering.com Page 539 of 6526 Approved by HEX Decision 2021-33 cI'm - oo.u 3 v c i'a,L o 3uu< „ min1.1 'v a=III1 r Ir IL E s` a illiw 172 o iti o Idit 1bsmti Tooom0 1--1- 1--.11-11) ' k-A i i I A. o Lu E.1 o i i/ 4" r D c i r 3 v W r 1 E. Z i'''\ t •' , NV 1'V_ ' F... v 3 9 1 a13 o'o o 1 'o p•oooa Q 8 Q - 3.0 Sr v v _ m o5„ c.Z 3"zWmai 4C Page 540 of 6526 LEGEND 1 Z /id ' A • ATTRACTION TRACT ROW • PUBLIC ROW/EASEMENTS I 61• W Cy iMP • BUSINESS PARK Q • DEVIATION LOCATION I 1 I A - PRESERVE TRACT PROPOSED PUBIC RO W IY I N ? XRESERVATION I PP PUBLCFACILRIEB TRACT(EMS) I 1 D X ' Z gy RELOCATED OR E%ISTIND w W yRR • RESIDENTIAL TRACT 1 ACCESSEASEMENTSNOT 0I LL EPROPOSEDFORVACATION Z' a W IF THE ROAD EASEMENTS IN THE PETITION PI.ECTI00028B)ARE VACATED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY 12 10 UCOMMISSIONERSTHENTHESEACCESSCONNECTIONSAREALLOWED.IF THE PETITION FOR VACATION U.IZ U A,AGRICULTURE S NOT APPROVED.THEN THESE ACCESS CONFECTIONS ARE NOT ALLOWED I 1— 0 re B 1 j UNDEVELOPED J F;LL WILLOW RUN RPUD A'—Wi, InWICIn 1 z; o wCN z; X O W A R A co' m H WU1F1 mi 11116 Rii R L QQRWWILLOWRUNRPUD LZccj® R 1 C : 1 ILI R I Ai P 7 : PRESERVE BP L ; /: TRACT W I FIRST ASSEMBLY 35.38 AC. R L 1 I MINISTRIES PUD j' ,i ROW 120' i OU 1 I7 RESERVATION - I I f PF I q HAG1Fr1PAJ AKE PKW II , EXISTING SWAMP a 0 IBUGGYBUILDINGSZ'Q o12 '60'HA¢ENDA I I [ ; P 1 Z A,AGRICULTUREjceIo• Igt IAKES;PKWr PRESERVE UNDEVELOPEDiWIUZ:w 1 EXTENSION A +, ..,','1I j IY W f2ESERVATION I 1, ,/ // W iCC I J i j I EXISTING 'ItRACT U W'd SWAMP \,;`.jsjIGu-- A;-AGRfeCftTti 2E I I BUGGv1RjIUIDEVELOPEPHHTRACK 1 Page 541 of 6526 EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER, LYING IN SECTION 11 THROUGH 14 AND 23 THROUGH 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST AND SECTION 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING FURTHER BOUND AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.89°10'42"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2835.68 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89°I I'14"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2906.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25;THENCE S.89°09'39"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2693.18 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89°I I'01"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2693.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION;THENCE N.00°13'35"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2636.34 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00°14'15"W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 2637.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION;THENCE N.87°07'13"E.ALONG A LINE COMMON TO SAID SECTION 24 AND 25 FOR 1704.07 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.01°08'02"E.ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 684.58 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°12'28"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 340.01 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.01°04'11"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2052.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87° 28'21"W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2025.64 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 23 AND 24;THENCE S.89°0I'58"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 1328.51 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01°18'52"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 679.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.89°22'00"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 663.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01°14'38"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 675.75 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S.89°01'58"W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 664.25 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE S.89°01'58"W. ALONG SAID LINE FOR 627.16 FEET; THENCE N.01°01'15"E. FOR 1699.99 FEET; THENCE S.89°01'58"W. FOR 701.42 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF A 170 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE S.01°0I'15"W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 68.31 FEET; THENCE S.89°0I'58"W. FOR 1232.97 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY; THENCE N.00°51'54"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 956.27 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 30. 00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR) THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87°37'31"E. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1237.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.OI°0I'15"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 30.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87°37'31"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1337.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.00°48'00"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2683.32 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87°31'38"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 334.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°48'11"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1341.38 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION;THENCE S.87°28'42"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 1002.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.00°48'45"E. ALONG SAID WEST Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 40 of 79BCCApproved10/25/1 1 Page 542 of 6526 AND EAST LINE FOR 335.13 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER;THENCE S.87°27'58"W.ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1236.32 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183; THENCE N.00°49'30"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 1004.62 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE N.00°50'27"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 344.07 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N.87° 28'56"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1235.95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00° 49'13"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 342.92 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87°25'45"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1336.32 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE CONTINUE N.87° 25'45"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 668.16 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00°47'37"W.ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.11 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14; THENCE N.87°27'14"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 668.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°47'14"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°28'42"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 1336.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE N.87°30' 06"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1328.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°38'50"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.26 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12;THENCE N.00°41'44"E.ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2707.07 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°40'34"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1321.29 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°36'23"W.ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2701. 30 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION SAID POINT BEING THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S,87°26'11"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 662.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00°35'02"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345. 93 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87° 30'06"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 664.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°38'S0"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°32'03"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°35'02"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION;THENCE S.87°33'59"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.81 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°38'51"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 1345.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87°37'27"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 667.27 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°42'40"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87°40'54"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2006.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°56'29"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1368.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87° 34'58"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1343. 68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°41'32"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1365.31 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°41'38"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER FOR 1337.58 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00°26'32"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 1703.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE Hacienda Lakes,PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/1 l Page 41 of79 Page 543 of 6526 NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.87°33'18"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 672.60 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°34' 02"W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 1022.89 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°28'21"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 674.89 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19;THENCE S.88°12'42"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 3093.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.03°39'20"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2676.74 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION;THENCE N.88°56'I0"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2940.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87°07' 20"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 FOR 2726.50 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87°07'I3"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 807.16 FEET; THENCE S.03°18'31"E. FOR 1451.00 FEET; THENCE N.88°56'54"E. FOR 1582.00 FEET; THENCE S.00°31'35"E. FOR 1130.61 FEET; THENCE S.89°I5'59"E. FOR 1823.18 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.89° 57'58"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2200.53 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°37'14"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89° 34'43"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 365.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.00°41'48"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89°23'00"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 364.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89°22'35"E. FOR 710.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.00°52'45"E. FOR 1334. 78 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89°46'12"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°49'34"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF FOR 668.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89° 57'58"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2497.82 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION;THENCE S.01°12'08"W.ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FOR 2640.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 101,084,043 SQUARE FEET OR 2,320.6 ACRES+/- LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS: PARCEL"A" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.00°59'IO"W. FOR 1329.95 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89°22' 35"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 355.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°55' 57"E. FOR 1332.36 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF;THENCE N.89°46'12"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 473,270 SQUARE FEET OR 10.9 ACRES+/- PARCEL"B" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTEROF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87°28'21"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1349. 77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°40'10"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1361.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87°I7'48"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1356.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°56'29"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR Hacienda Lakes,PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/I1 Page 42 of 79 Page 544 of 6526 682.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87°23' 02"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 338.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.OI°00'20"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 683.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°28'21"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 337.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2,072,100 SQUARE FEET OR 47.6 ACRES+/- Hacienda Lakes,PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 43 of 79 BCC Approved 10/25/I 1 Page 545 of 6526 OR 4938 PG 2435 Exhibit D-1 Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Legal Description Approved by HEX Decision 2014-18 Exhibit"A" HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES TRACT A A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,BEING BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE 4 INCH SQUARE CONCRETE MONUMENT REFERENCED IN FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD NUMBER 84343 MARKING THE EAST ONE QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST; THENCE ALONG THE EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 23,SAID LINE BEING THE BASIS: de' s ,' f + )rlL IS DESCRIPTION, S.89°0I'58"W.,FOR 30.03 FEET • s ` ON -;'4; l' : WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BENFIELD RO CM- THE POINT OF : .:.'NING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE CONTINUING • s I. s/'ii '` %)" • 0 T i ;;' SECTION LINE, S.89°01'58"W.,FOR 1,298.4: :.1 i j' % ! ;" .,. At. '' . CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE NORTHEA !o RNER OF THE~!; ` t- ! .NE QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTEb.AID SECTION ,*+` ''i,:l,M ALONG THE EAST, SOUTH AND WEST LINES 0 441,11%,ORMEAST 0A TER OF THE i. -NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER 0 0 !,t rar 1., •. QUARTER THE FOLLOWING THREE(3)COURSES: CO'''- 1. THENCE S.01°18'52"W.,FOR 679.65 FEET TO A 5/8"IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER; 2. THENCE S.89°22'00"W.,FOR 663.28 FEET TO A 5/ 8"IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER; 3. THENCE N.01°14'3 8"E.,FOR 675.75 FEET TO A 5/ 8" IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER AND A POINT ON SAID EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE S.89°01'58"W., FOR 664.251;TI TO A 5/8"IRON ROD WITH CAP LB 6990 MARKING THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST-WEST ONE QUARTER SECTION LINE S.89°01'58"W.,FOR 627.16 FEET TO A 5/8"IRON ROD MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST ONE HALF OF THE EAST ONE HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF N.01°01'15"E.,FOR 1,699.99 FEET TO A 5/8"IRON ROD; THENCE S.88°58'45"E.,FOR 445.48 FEET; Page 44 of 79 Page 546 of 6526 OR 4938 PG 2436411 THENCE N.01° 01' 15"E.,FOR 400.00 FEET; THENCE S.88°58'45"E.,FOR 151.77 FEET; THENCE N.01°01' 15"E.,FOR 457.04 FEET TO A POINT ON THE FUTURE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD EXTENSION AND A POINT ON A CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID FUTURE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING SIX(6)COURSES: 1. THENCE EASTERLY 268.58 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 949.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°12'55"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.82° 44'27"E.FOR 267.68 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; 2. THENCE EASTERLY 297.08 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28°22'07"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.88°49'03"E.FOR 294.05 FEET TO A POINT OF COMP!': T ' II, t:laf; 3. THENCE EASTERLY 211.21 •$ :c • 10 't V" A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RAD la ' o 1,040.00 FEET ' *I • A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11°38'09"AND BEING SUB r.i n a ;_ A ' : ' i 1 t ER - ' S.71°10'49"E.FOR Nk 210.84 FEET TO A POINT • ' ' '' -'' 6 t 4. 4. THENCE EASTERLY 54•.8, air iu` • c N.E CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A ' . ' •t R; .a- ' t'i c ! :I ANGLE OF 27°00'44"AND BEING SUB :44"ED BY A CHO' , ' t tt ' S.78°52'07"E.FOR 541.84 FEET; 1' Q 5. THENCE N.87°3731"E.,FO' FEET TO A PO 1 • • ' 'VATURE; 6. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY '# + * • • C OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A '11t-L. al i+ :e EET THROUGH A CEN t KAL ANGLE OF 90°5T22"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.46°53'48"E.FOR 71.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE FUTURE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BENFIELD ROAD AND A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE ALONG SAID FUTURE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING FOUR(4)COURSES: 1. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 955.48 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,160.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47°11'39"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.25°00'56"E. FOR 928.70 FEET; 2. THENCE S.48° 36'46"E.,FOR 641.57 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 3. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 909.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,040.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50°04'53"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.23° 34'19"E.FOR 880.38 FEET; 4. THENCE S.01°28'07"W.,FOR 239.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN. Page 45 of 79 Page 547 of 6526 EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation#1 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.01.B, related to streets in subdivisions,that requires subdivisions to have platted road rights-of-way for streets,to allow private streets to be provided by separate access easements rather than platted road rights-of way. Deviation#2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c that limits the number of model homes,to allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the various phases or communities within the project. The number of model homes may exceed five for each phase or community within the project,but shall not exceed a total of 60 models for the entire MPUD development. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 to allow "boundary marker" signage on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways that provide access to the MPUD. The sign content area for"boundary markers"to be located in the Residential Tract R may be 15 feet in height rather than 8 feet in height as limited in LDC Subsection 5.06.02B.6.b. Deviation#4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2. that limits fence or wall heights to six (6') feet, to allow fences or walls to be no greater than eight(8')feet throughout the development. Where associated with existing or future public roadways, or Tract A, a 20 foot tall visual screen may be installed as a wall, berm, or wall/berm combination. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.02.13 G., and 4.06.02 CS., that requires a six foot tall opaque architecturally finished masonry wall, or berm, or combination thereof be provided around the boundaries of a business park. Buffering around the proposed Business Park Tract would be as required by the entirety of the referenced sections of the LDC, but the six foot wall, or berm, or combination thereof will not be required on the Business Park Tract along the frontage of Lord's Way. Deviation #6 seeks to allow one real estate sign in addition to the real estate signage permitted in LDC Section 5.06.02 B.2.,that would be erected off-site from the Residential Tract, in the Commercial Tract. Deviation #7 The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain in the present location until: the sign is relocated to allow the construction of the bridge to extend Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and/or a new sign can be permitted in Tract C. Deviation#8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1. that limits care unit Floor Area Ratio(FAR)to 0.45,to allow a care unit FAR of 0.60. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to a residential development with a maximum height of 8 feet, to allow for one (1) ground sign with a maximum height of 13 feet at the entrance to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes as shown on Attachment E-2, Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Entry Sign Location Map.fHEX 2014-181 Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06. 02.B.6, which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 10 feet for residential entry signage at Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E-3,Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto.IHEX 2016-201 Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 46 of 79 Page 548 of 6526 Deviation #11 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6. b, which permits two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet, to allow for one (1) total ground or wall sign with a maximum sign area of 80 square feet at the entrance to the Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E-3, Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-201 Deviation#12 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead-end streets,to allow one(1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development, as depicted on Exhibit E-3, Sign Location Map, Sheet 3 of 3,attached hereto.[HEX 2016-201 Deviation #13 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.02.F, which requires that off-street parking must be arranged so that no motor vehicles have to back onto any street, excluding single-family and two-family residential dwellings and churches, to allow for back out parking from the proposed off-street parking for multi-family dwellings within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development,as depicted on Exhibit B-2, attached hereto. [HEX 2016-20] Deviation #14 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 12 feet for residential entry signage at Hacienda Lakes—North Area as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes —North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 2 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #15 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two (2)ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet,to allow for two (2) ground or wall signs that are 64 square feet each. which include signage for each of the residential developments which share access to Collier Boulevard at the entrance to the Hacienda Lakes —North Area, as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes—North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. This deviation is subject to conditions that secondary signage is specifically for the two "R" Tract properties labeled "Future Development" that are immediately fronting and adjacent to the intersection of the entry road with Collier Boulevard, and no other signage for these two "R" Tract properties is permitted facing Collier Boulevard. Deviation #16 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.14, which allows boundary marker signs to be a maximum of 24 square feet to allow for two boundary marker signs with a maximum of 32 square feet at the Hacienda Lakes—North Area,as depicted on Ex hibit E-4,Hacienda Lakes—North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #17 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead-end streets except when designed as a cul-de-sac, to allow one (1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Hacienda Lakes—North Area residential development,as depicted on Exhibit E-4,Hacienda Lakes—North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2,attached hereto. Deviation #18 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, which requires landscape buffers to separate developments, to allow for no buffer along the northern PUD boundary in either or both of the following circumstances: 1) West of the FPL easement if the abutting properties are rezoned or amended to provide for a unified development plan of the northern property (currently Agriculture-zoned property) and the Hacienda Lakes -North Area properties prior to approval of an SDP or PPL; 2)East of the FPL easement if the abutting property to the north (currently Willow Run RPUD) is rezoned to provide for no adjacent buffer, as depicted on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 47 of 79 Page 549 of 6526 Deviation#19 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2,which permits a maximum fence/wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts,to instead allow for a decorative wall with maximum height of 14 feet in the location shown on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words strrek—threugh are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 48 of 79 Page 550 of 6526 Approved by HEX Decision 2014-18 ATTACHMENT E-1 ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES PROJECT LOCATION MAP PDI-PL2014-0000973 r f { NORTH t f\7, it 7 e 11 ENTRY SIGN f PROJECTS ' 111 ' DRI c SITE ,, BOUNDARYr MI/USN 4. I 1 44/ 7/ 1. I I— ET: I P > 1r ol {:,.___ s L i 1 I 1_1;5"-' f— Exhibit B Page 3 of 4 Page 551 of 6526 Approved by HEX Decision 2014-18 ATTACHMENT E.2 ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES ENTRY SIGN LOCATION MAP PDI-PL2014-0000973 ENTRY SIGN RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD r-~ : C il ilfro. 4".d` r----r— ____:_•.......---\\) , _ I : K."' flk Yu In•....., — t-"'- :JUG - `` r "..."" .._ fr I f- a 1 1 1 7- Exhibit B cage. 4 ,f 4 k Page 552 of 6526 Approved by HEX Decision 2016-20 Exhibit "1"Page 5of7nIIV.i a AO 1.1331.19M.C.O IVEt t../1901141E1 LwP ICarBSYCMORN J1IVII1.II 7s..s tu+.. c 7 tiSOWUM•Nm. AMC VIDAR e.1e J a 1Cl.LQ VQ RU•1•IO.I.I 19N11133N19N31 lI d xOd aa8VVdaxdw.my.aaravn..iv an uvx+uw,vanm+i 1 4 1 V/Si I I NOLtVA313'V NV-Id NOIS AIII.N3 AVVWfad-E 30 1133HS'E-3118I1-1X3-S3AV'1 VQN3IDVH IN 3Nf1ZV911,131011.400 A1Nf103 ONV 1N3l3lI3d Q331A311 BItCVC61N311W00ALN/100(INV 1N3f10)213d 0360.9t1 BLitt 12 V_9II1121«CRI HAMS, 00A3L1 SNOISIATA N 1J 1 I} i E.—, 0 a V- 4. 4\, 111 w M I w I x 4 w 4.) E i iS'i 7 c9 a. 1. ii' L _ g'E 6 Ia i x U8 01 1 19hgruBIS-eseBSI-EO l09 meu.ld A+eirt0111g14x3 9011e1Ae0 AS Nita I03-00.9 LS;39914'9-9BulMai0119reue.,7(eae 901—.e)1el BPtepeH)00.919%;r Page 553 of 6526 no ..,. Os* Approved by HEX Decision 2016-20 Exhibit "1" Page6of7 NORTH ESPLANADE AT 3 HACIENDA LAKES s T - 4_, PROJECT LOCATION RATTL HAMMOC I DR ICR- r---b4 BOUNDARY, 1 PROPOSED I BEhFIELD ROWi iilt`.a.,:" r, SidAL PAL;I RD 1 t 8 L , 9 i UeH I 7. EXHIBIT E-3, SHEET 2 OF 3 3 AZURE AT HACIENDA LAKES EXHIBIT LOCATION MAP WALDROP SECTION:TOWNSHIP.RANGE: 'cm"CI"MCan[a"vnsauwnww"w I: I_ENGINEERINGPREPAREDFOR: 14,23 24 SOS 26E cna EN 0°' 0 I M»0I lvwc aori" urtauv TOLL BROTHERS. AMERICAS LUXURY HOME BUILDER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA WOOA a a ws•t aee IOWA VIM'.R SI 1 28 FILE NAME: SI801 EOSOi.dwg g1yµ0y7m FyMoy h SHEET: 3 OF 4 nun, Page 554 of 6526 1- ,,,, WA ',e Ai ' 4 s.Approved by HEX Decision 2016-20 Exhibit"1"1 4o, tFill 41"11111111r Z"' 11111h 1117 °UitOs1 .il ill 1041L m0.,CL w 10Ot eni...1 aJ g e > .,,,- os2 \ itt III 11111." in _ At•4 S ik urn Mtirt > I - <A.. N N c,33 1 ki 5 ' 7 .4s.)::,%:.,..,-(0 .., -,„, .. . 0, .. .:. *i . , 1, r.: < ,.. p ,,,, ;.0. ., g as et t e' f,:.i.' ,(...‘‘,.: ei ,, .9t , , 0--, .4/ rm ,....:,-,4. / • .ii w >-z-,4!kiitiiik, co < o 1... o m f - '''-., •X ° Ll• E2 yz W R rrei. 2 Z 1.14 E 0 ' a. U) fr-3 WV ESL 9111MAI Mir tOiriCOLOWAdl...7611.41.0..1 all mormiromwriwomoomno(.041P1 917vr Page 555 of 6526 n A I,i N 1 r I iI BOUNDARY PROPERTY BOUNDARY.TYPICAL EVELO j MARKER i (32 SF) FUTURE i ENTRY , PMENT L_--, . 1.oc. - ., \\ i t , SIGN d PROPOSED I ENTRY ACCESS E' SIGN S tt IARE3 ' F 84 SF) I 6i ''' EASEMENT1pLAKE LAKE 1 \_ (AMENITY I FUTURE r i CENTER PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT_II pI DEAD-END t l I. BOUNDA(( yy l 1 -- --_ I _ S(MAX?150') MARKER SF) 1 LAKE. LAKEi LAKE. TT lM J_ _WALUROP ENGINEERING HACIgLTA LAKES FUTURE NORTH AREA ROAD CONECTION ....,.. PREPARED FOR: EXHIBIT E-4,HACIENDA LAKES-NORTH AREA SIGN DEVIATION EXHIBIT,SHEET I OF 2 Page 556 of 6526 38' ACCENT WALL(SUM•&ONE) 20' TOTAL SIGN AREA 8/SF ACCENT- PRiMARv: : A:4. 2)SECONOMYNNAE1]!F) WALL AIL////ORPLANTER 10• 1HACIENDA1 L NORTH J SECONDARY NAME 12' SECONDARY NAME L J 22 12' SIGN ACCENT WALL SIGN AREA 32 SF r 1 HACIENDAi- WALL OR I NORTH IA1PUNTERL_ J 1r WALDROP t ENGINEERING HACIENDA LAKES NORTH AREA ermakiegimmmag I 15'PREPARED FOR: t It Brothers 1! EXHIBIT E-4,HACIENDA LAKES-NORTH AREA SIGN DEVIATION EXHIBIT,SHEET 2 OF 2 =,t, ---: Page 557 of 6526 EXHIBIT F LIST OF OWNER COMMITMENTS For the purposes of this PUD, the owner commitments set forth below are applicable to Hacienda Lakes of Naples,LLC, its successors, and/or assigns. The owner commitments below shall not be enforceable upon Swamp Buggy Days, Inc., nor Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc. I LEGAL A. Access to Parcel"A",as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via a new roadway easement from Owner that shall be recorded in the public records of Collier County, and shall run in a north-south direction from the existing thirty-foot roadway easement recorded in O.R. Book 857, Page 1800. This easement shall be recorded within 90-days of approval of this PUD. B. Access to Parcel "B",as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via the existing roadway and ingress/egress easements recorded in O.R. Book 271, Page 505, O.R. Book 622, Page 1609, O.R. Book 245, Page 124, and O.R. Book 287, Page 18. C. No existing public access/roadway easements shall be vacated to preclude access to off-site private and public lands without providing replacement access easements. This new roadway easement shall be equivalent to the existing easement and shall be recorded concurrently with the vacation. II ENVIRONMENTAL A. Native vegetation shall be preserved in this MPUD in accordance with the table below: Hacienda Lakes Native Preserve Summary Description Total Urban(ac) Rural(ac) Project Area 2262.14 625.07 1637.07 On-Site Native Vegetation 1721.97 295.38 1426.59 Less the Native Veg Within Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. 2.02 2.02 0.00 Less the Native Veg Within The Lords Way Ext. 0.42 0.42 0.00 Less the Native Veg Within the Benfield Road Corridor 12.91 5.01 7.90 Less the Native Veg Within Archaeological Preserves 6.07 1.06 5.02 Native Vegetation For Requirement Calculations 1700.54 286.87 1413.67 Percentage for required Native Preserve 25% Required Native Vegetation* 921.09 71. 71 849.38 Preserved Native Vegetation ** 1395.35 40.81 1352.57 Compensating Native Preserve(2x URF Deficit)"61.80 Total Preserve Area 1544.14 53.06 1491.08 Hacienda Lakes,PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 56 of 79 Page 558 of 6526 Native Preserve Requirement (LOC Subsection 2.05.02.B.2.g.ii.) of 90% within the RFMUD Sending Lands exceeds 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands. Therefore, over 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands shall be the required Rural native vegetation area. Compliance with LOC Subsection 3.05.07 H.1.a., requires native vegetation planting enhancement of a minimum of 12.24 acres of the project's URF Subdistrict Preserve Tract. Compliance with 100% of the native vegetation preservation requirement shall be achieved through preserving RFMUD project native vegetation in an amount two times the deficient native vegetation preserve acreage in the URF Subdistrict project lands as is provided for through the adopted GMP amendment. B. A Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring plan is to be submitted once approved from SFWMD, for County review. C. The MPUD shall be developed in accordance with the Wildlife Habitat Management Plan accepted by Collier County as contained in the Environmental Impact Statement. D. An updated listed species survey for the future development areas shall be submitted prior to the next development order approval. E. Installation of the Sabal Palm Road culvert crossings and spreader swales shall occur prior to the first preliminary acceptance. III ENGINEERING A. A SFWMD ROW permit will be required for widening the bridge at Rattlesnake Hammock/951 over the Henderson Creek Canal. IV ARCHAEOLOGICAL and HISTORIC RESOURCES A. The five archaeological sites identified within the Hacienda Lakes parcel are denoted AP, Archaeological Preserve on Sheets 3 -12 in the MPUD Master Plan Set. These sites must remain undeveloped. A public access easement around the archaeological sites for potential digs and further study has been provided. Disturbance to these five protected archaeological sites may only occur with County approval and approval of the State Division of Historical Resources,and any disturbance shall only be permitted under the direct supervision of a qualified archaeologist. B. Historical/archeological areas are not used to meet preserve requirements because if an archaeological dig is required,then native vegetation would have to be removed. V EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES A. In order to mitigate for the project impacts and demand on Emergency Medical Services EMS), the developer shall provide a one acre parcel to Collier County. This public facility site is identified as "PF"on the MPUD Master Plan (Exhibit C). The dedication of the one acre site shall be by deed to Collier County and is subject to an Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit based on the fair market value of the donated property. The valuation of the one acre site dedication has been determined to be $30,000 per acre, for the purposes of the Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit,and the conveyance shall occur no later than at the time the 500th residential unit is included in a development order request (site development plan, or plat), subsequent to the adoption of the DRI Development Order. If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances described in this paragraph, then Owner shall be entitled to an EMS impact fee credit for the value of the Hacienda Lakes,PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 57 of 79 BCC Approved 10/25/I 1 Page 559 of 6526 mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. The total cost of State and Federal mitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. In lieu of EMS impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County-owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the EMS impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this paragraph. VI TRANSPORTATION For the purposes of the following commitments, it must be understood that the property was divided into three main areas: North area being north of The Lord's Way extension; South area being south of Rattlesnake Hammock Road plus School; Benfield Road Improvements. The South area commitments shall be constructed in a sequential manner. However, the rest of the commitments are not sequential and can be accomplished in no specific order. Similarly, the three areas identified above are not required to be developed in a sequential manner. SOUTH AREA The Owner shall construct (here forward to mean "constructed to meet minimum County requirements for acceptance"), at its sole expense without road impact fee credits, the initial two lanes (south side) of Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from C. R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement(approximately 0.25 miles). In addition,the Owner shall construct the Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below and to improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below. Upon completion (here forward to mean "completed construction to County minimum requirements, and reserved for future conveyance to the County at the County's request.") of all of such improvements, the Owner shall be allowed to develop up to 327,500 square feet of Retail Land Uses, or Residential Pod A, or some combination of the two land uses. However, the total number of gross trips to be generated by this portion of development shall not exceed 1,409 PM peak hour trips. In the event that Residential Pod A is developed, access to Pod A will be either an internal private roadway or via an extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road to the entrance of Pod A. These improvements and the areas allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 1, below. All of these improvements are site related improvements. Hacienda Lakes,PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 58 of 79 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 560 of 6526 Figure 1-Hacienda lakes DRI-Commitment I Wand v Existing Lanes/Turn Lanes t Lanes/Turn Lanes tote Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed i Potential Areas to be Developed y***.' T, h p i it at 7 11tttr 1 Rattlesnake Hammock Road tension I r, ' . it Residenwl y .`,.. ii illb \ j 4 1 t Florida Power Line Easement II. The Owner shall construct, at its own expense and without road impact fee credits, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from Florida Power Line Easement to the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds (approximately 0.25 miles) and improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the final geometry as shown is Figure 2, below. These improvements are site related improvements. Upon completion of Such itttp'oventcnt,the-Owner-shall be allowed to--develop-the-following additional land uses: 20,000 Square Feet of General Office,and; 50,000 Square Feet of Medical Office,and; 135 Room Hotel,and; Remaining portion of the 327, 500 Square Feet of Retail (if applicable pursuant to Commitment 1),and; Remaining portion of Residential Pod A (if applicable pursuant to Commitment I), and; Required residential uses within Activity Center land use; Hacienda Lakes,PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 59 of 79 Approved CCPC Consent-Rev.09/15/I 1 Page 561 of 6526 These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 2,below. Figure 2—Hacienda Lakes DIG•Commitment II lettag 11. 12111ExistingLanes/Turn ii 1 t lanes/Turn Lanesto be Constructed/Reconstructed l' wax.. Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed r---1 Area Previously Developed Area to be Developed 3 Potential Area to be Developed i it 4. ,__ .Nt,,,.. I* r Y 1 41'1ttte r i Rattlesnake Hammock R• . ension Residential ; .' J t • Pod 111 se 1 Florida Power line Easement HI. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds to the future Benfield Road as a two lane road, including construction of the Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension at Benfield Road intersection. Upon completion of such improvement,the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 919 Student Elementary School,and; Residential Pod B. Since only a portion of the capacity to be provided by this two lane section will be consumed by the Hacienda Lakes PUD, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits equal to 50% of the cost of this improvement. The cost of this improvement will be determined at the time Hacienda Lakes,PUDZ-2006-AR-1 0 1 46 Approved CCPC Consent—Rev.09/15/11 Page 60 of 79 Page 562 of 6526 of construction, and shall include the fair market value of the land or easement when the Owner conveys the road right of way to the County, free and clear of liens and encumbrances. Fair market value has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 3, below. Fifty percent(50%)of the cost of this improvement is deemed a site-related improvement. Figure 3—Hacienda Lakes DRI-Commitment NI 6. 1Wand Existing Lanes/Turn Lanes to Lanes/Turn Lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed y 1 Roadway Segment to be Constructed r' Area Previously Developedl_ Area to be Developed 0 ILtsiR7?lf r AU i STOP ! L' 11r s' Rattlesnake Hammock Ro • ension i y j' 2 u ` Residential i• y l 4 I Residential Pod B P PodA Florida Power Line Easement NORTH AREA IV. With no improvement other than a bridge to be constructed by the Owner,at its sole cost and without road impact fee credit, over the water canal that runs parallel to C.R.951 at the northern project site access,the Owner shall be allowed to develop Residential Pod C (not to exceed 300 PM peak hour trips at the connection to C.R.951). This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 4, below. At no time will the County accept ownership of this bridge. This improvement is a site related improvement. Hacienda Lakes,PUDZ-2006-A R-1 0 146 Page 61 of 79 Approved CCPC Consent—Rev.09/15/11 Page 563 of 6526 Figure 4—Hacienda Lakes DRI-Commitment IV P Residential PodC int" . r :2"":1 77s t Florida r : Power Line Easement Rattlesnake Hammock R• erasion N. ti Residential '. Residential - Pod B i pod A .. Imand Existing Lanes/Turn Lanes t lanes/Turn Lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed jJ Area Previously Developed Area to be Developed V. The Owner shall, at its sole expense and without road impact fee credits, complete the reconstruction of The Lord's Way from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement and construct the extension of The Lord's Way from Florida Power Line Easement to the west entrance to the Business Park with a two lane undivided cross section. In addition,when the Collier Boulevard at The Lord's Way intersection is signalized upon meeting warrants, the cost of the signalization of this intersection will be shared proportionately among the Owner and other developments located in the area (east and west of C.R.951) and at no cost to Collier County and without road impact fee credits. These improvements are site-related improvements. Upon completion of such road improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Business Park,and; Residential Pod D. Hacienda Lakes,PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 62 of 79 Approved CCPC Consent—Rev.09/15/11 Page 564 of 6526 These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 5, below. I Figure S-Madenda Lakes DRI-Commitment V I Florida Power line Easement ip..044. ential dC a \v i Residential Ia Pod 0 l Thelord's Wa _ 011ie* li:1' 1 r '"•• l Rattlesnake ;mockR i ,, f- -' c' ti y1 P. i.ti t \ Residential \ '; 1 Residential Pod B 1 PodA ,. I *r 111, Existing Lanes/Turn Lanes t lanes/Tum lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed s. Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed Area Previously Developed 0 Area to be Developed a" When the DRI has received certificates of occupancy for 66 percent of the total commercial and residential development authorized by the DRI, Collier County will perform an evaluation and inform the Owner if it is necessary to convey road right of way to the County for the section of The Lord's Way Extension from the west entrance to the Business Park/School to Benfield Road. If Collier County requests the road right of way, the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the needed road right of way up to a width of 60 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, and shall receive impact fee credits equal to 100 percent of the fair market value of the road easement conveyed to the County which has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. No further certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the road easement conveyance is recorded in the public records of Collier County. If this segment of The Lord's Way is not deemed necessary (through documentation, or lack thereof, in the LRTP or the CIE) by the time the development achieves 66 percent of the total approved development quantities, this commitment shall be considered expired.___. Hacienda Lakes,PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 63 of 79 Approved CCPC Consent—Rev.09/15/1 l Page 565 of 6526 BENFIELD ROAD IMPROVEMENTS VI. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense Benfield Road from Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension to the entrance of Residential Pod E with a two lane undivided cross section and reserve the right of way necessary for the final 4 lane divided cross section. Residential Pod E shall be connected in a consistent manner with the County's right of way reservation plans or construction plans for future Benfield Road sections. Upon completion of such improvement and acceptance by Collier County of the improvements, the Owner shall convey to the County a road easement for the road right of way needed for this section of Benfield Road up to a width of 120 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon recordation of the road easement in the public records of Collier County, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 50% of the fair market value of the road easement necessary for this section of Benfield Road and for 100% of the increase in cost resulting from the construction of the road according to County Standards (arterial) instead of as a local subdivision road. The fair market value of 50%of the conveyance of the road right of way easement to the County has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. Fifty percent 50%) of the fair market value of the road right of way easement and the total cost of the improvements are site-related improvements. The Cost of this improvement will be determined at the time of construction. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Residential Pod E. These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 6, below. Hacienda Lakes,PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 64 of 79 BCC Approved 10/25/I 1 Page 566 of 6526 F —Hacienda DRI•Commitment VI Florida Power Line Easement Resldendal Pod y'. k. .-,,,4 Rnidetkial h ,a Pod 0 ift rResidenial Pod E Mt lord's W s T.. Rattlesnake Hammock Ito • a tO r s & + N Residential Resldentlai z .+'* Pod d 'Ai Pad A ` e Existing Lanes/rum Lanes unes/Twn Lanes to be Comtructed/Raconstrutted Roadway Sepnent Prevwusly Constructed Roadway Sett/twin to be Constructed Al ea Previously oeveeoped 4ea to be Developed VII. Benfield Road South of Rattlesnake Hammock Extension and north of Residential Pod E connection to Benfield Road: the Owner will convey right of way to Collier County by road easement for Benfield Road on areas not to be built by Owner up to a width of 120 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon such conveyance, Collier County will provide road impact fees credits for 100% of the fair market value of the road easement. The value of the right of way has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. The area to be conveyed is depicted in Figure 7, below, Hacienda Lakes,PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 65 of 79 Approved CCPC Consent—Rev.09/15/I 1 Page 567 of 6526 Hews 7-Madenda Lairs ORR-Commitment VW Florida Power Line Easement ReltidaRtisl Pod C s iar•9:40.;) um.. Pod oittiy• Jews, sessionalsesionalPodE Thettxd's Way I Ratdesnalir Hxnmock anetcts t 4 L r•_ .. Air rJE3a•' Apo.: y y S+S ` Reside/SW Retadenttaly ti.. Pod tl p, Pod A c a ter.,,Nu- le FsntirgLanes/TumLanes L Lanes/Turn Lanes to be Camtnxted/Reconstructe0 Roadway Segment liveaousty Constructed Rat d Way to be P Tr,e.ved Area.tessousty lkaMoPed r .Area to be Uevetapd VIII. Benfield Road South of Sabal Palm Road: the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the right of way needed for the future construction of Benfield Road south of Saba! Palm Road (approximately 1.00 mile) up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and at no expense to the County. In addition, the Owner shall receive no impact fee credits for such right of way conveyance. This is a site-related improvement.The area to be dedicated is depicted in Figure 8,below. Hacienda Lakes,PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 66 of 79 Approved CCPC Consent—Rev.09/15/11 Page 568 of 6526 Figure 8-Hacienda Lakes DRI•Commitment VIII Florida Power Line I Easement i is'+ ' - i 25+a Y M J wand Right of Way to be Dedicated IX. As a part of its State and Federal permits, the Owner shall pay for mitigation required for State and or Federal environmental impacts arising from the permitting for portions of Benfield Road described in Commitments VI and VII. In addition to this commitment,the Owner shall at no cost to County either: (1)Convey drainage easement(s) to the County for their stormwater management facility needs free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, or 2) agree to accept stormwater from Benfield Road into the Project's stormwater management system. These are site-related contributions. X. At two thresholds during construction of this DRI,the Owner shall provide to Collier County a transportation analysis which compares the value of the Owner's contribution to the County's public road network against the DRI's proportionate share, (as defined in the State of Florida's HB 7207) of which this DRI impacts County and State road segments. If Owner's contribution is less than its impact based on the transportation analysis,then Owner shall pay to County the difference in three installments starting 90 days after the transportation analysis is agreed to by both parties, and then each 90 days thereafter until paid in full. The transportation contribution by the Developer shall be defined as the sum of all road impact fees paid to date, the costs of the non site-related transportation Hacienda Lakes,PUDZ-2006-AR-1 0 146 Page 67 of 79 Approved CCPC Consent—Rev.09/15/11 Page 569 of 6526 improvements (those receiving road impact fee credits) on Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Benfield Road and the Lords Way, plus the value of any road right-of-way conveyance by donation to the County unless otherwise calculated as an impact fee credit. The first transportation analysis shall be submitted to the County when 33%of approved development trips (1,109 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, without projecting forward growth. The second transportation analysis will be submitted when 66% of the approved development trips (2,219 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, with a projection toward build out. The second analysis and reconciliation will finalize any transportation related assessments owed by the Developer for the build out of the Project.With the annual PUD monitoring report,Developer shall provide an annual trip generation analysis of trips approved by Site Development Plan approval and building permit issuance compared to total trips approved within the DRI. Upon triggering 33% or 66% as described above, Developer shall submit the transportation analysis described in this paragraph within six months. No certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the traffic analysis and annual trip generation analysis required by this paragraph and any payments due have been delivered to County,unless the BCC grants an extension. XI. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 75,000 square feet of retail land uses, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop/shelter fronting the Commercial Tract C that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop/shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site-related contribution. XII. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 70,000 square feet of business park land uses, or prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a school or educational facility in the Business Park Tract, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop/shelter fronting the Business Park Tract BP that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop/shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site-related contribution. XIII. DRI traffic studies identified an off-site impact at the interchange of I-75 and S.R. 951 Ramps Intersection, specifically in the left-turn movement serving the northbound S.R. 951 to westbound(northbound) I-75 turning movement. Assessments of this operation in 2011 indicate that changes to lane usage and signage could augment the acceptable operation of the intersection and delay the impacts of the DRI. Hacienda Lakes traffic becomes significant (exceeds five percent of service volume) at this location at 46.2 percent of site traffic generation. When the first transportation analysis required under subsection X above is undertaken(e.g. at 33 percent of site traffic generation),the existing traffic flow and level of service at this location will be reviewed and projected to the build-out of the DRI. If the 2011 operational assessment is confirmed and the intersection is, or will be, operating at an unacceptable level of service as determined by County or FDOT, then the Developer will identify a solution to offset its impacts and/or restore acceptable operating conditions, and contribute its proportionate share, per subsection X above, of the cost of the improvement to the appropriate government agency. If a proportionate share payment is identified as needed,the owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 100 percent of this contribution. Hacienda Lakes,PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 68 of 79 BCC Approved 10/25/1 t Page 570 of 6526 XIV. If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances that are eligible for impact fee credits described in Subsections III, V, VI and VII of this Article VI, Transportation, then Owner shall be entitled to a transportation impact fee credit for the value of the State and Federal environmental mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. The total cost of State and Federal mitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. In lieu of transportation impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County-owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the transportation impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this Subsection XIV. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 69 of 79 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 571 of 6526 1l Legend Land Use aCAT STOP/SHELTER Attraction Tract Proposed CAT Route 4A&4B Extension Business Park or School Existing CAT Route 4A 6 48 Commercial 0 o Existing CAT Facility 4A EN Preserve Tract ci W Existing CAT Facility 48 Public Facilities Tract(EMS) Existing CAT Route 7 Junior Deputy 2777 Proposed Pedestrian Facilities School 3 Existing Shared Use Path Residential Traci Project Boundary 7',;i Residential 1 Medical Use I Development Boundary Public ROW Reservation CC XISTING CAT iii ROUTE 7 TO "CO ISLAND) Proposed IAccess II 111111.1111b- ilk A . . Pedestrian Facilities Wilt DEVELOPER Be Extended Along All PROPOSED CAT Internal Roads Even if Not Show STOP/SHELTER THE LORIYS WAY POTENTIAL CAT STOP/SHELTER PROPOSED 4A&46CAT ROUTE EXTENSION DEVELOPER Proposed PROPOSED Access CAT STOP/SHELTER RATTLESNAKE PROP.RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK r•HAMMOCK RD.EXT. V POTE AL 111 Mr I I I _ CAT STOP/S LTER rEXISTING 1 CAT i ROUTE 4A i 1 W Q Pedestrl. acilltles Will RA Be ExtenQ• Along All Internal Roads E en If Not Shown EXISTIN' EXISTING I 1 EXISTING CAT CAT I ' CAT FAC TY FACILITY ROUTE 4A 4 VP) 4B(TYP) STATE 4B LANDS t I_ c SOO 1000 T Hacienda :kes Fne, j I, r !i i. Master r.bility Plan 1 Prced 6Y:nrymee N perPrint.;bale:Odd.e.20I0 Frio:T.%Pro l4U00A05 0150.02, 03 NetlendrnMeltGulnuexcTTr.n10MP and 19 ipdated 08/27/20 lb Page 70 of 79 Page 572 of 6526 IIII Legend Land Use elCAT STOP/SHELTER Attraction Tract Proposed CAT Route 4A&4B Extension Business Park or School 4--Existing CAT Route 4A&40 Commercial m a Existing CAT Facility 4A Preserve Tract K II Existing CAT Facility 4B Public Facilities Tract(EMS) Existing CAT Route 7 Junior Deputy K Proposed Pedestrian Facilities II.School j Existing Shared Use Path Residential Tract W nProject Boundary Residential/Medical Use O n Development Boundary Public ROW ReservationCO wW J EXISTING CAT Proposed 1\ 1 ROUTE 7 Access (TO MARCO ISLAND)41.Pedestrian Facilities Will Proposed14.1..........t........164144 Be Extended Along All Access Internal Roads Even if Not Shown Access IDEVELOPER PROPOSED CAT STOP/SHELTER HACIENDA LAKES PKWY t - l es e. POTENTIAL 4 CAT STOP/SHELTER/ PROPOSED e 4A&4B CAT ROUTE EXTENSION DEVELOPER Proposed PROPOSED Access CAT STOP/SHELTER RATTLESNAKE PROP.RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK-•HAMMOCK RD.EXT. 7; I I POTENTIAL li IF CAT STOP/SHELTER EXISTING IV EAUCAT ROUTE 4A i A , RQ I Pedestri ecilltles Will I*Q Be Exten ,Along All i*Internal Roads en If Not Shown EXISTING\EXISTIN 1 EXISTING CAT CAT CAT FACILITY FACILITY ROUTE 4A 4A(TYP) 4B(TYP) STATE 4B LANDS 000 i.(100 ATA Hacienda Lakes noel y ,rA Master Mobility Plan REVISED(07120I2022) Prepared By:nReeee PrIMYq only ocbtn s.2010 N Ode:FiPrel:412005`as 0150.02.00 HarlmmrLxkxnA0ao0r.0ZZ ira.IPAP.mad Page 71 of 79 Page 573 of 6526 VII PUBLIC UTILITIES A. Per the current 2008 Water and Sewer Master Plan Update, the majority area of this project is located within the Collier County Water-Sewer District Boundary; there are some areas of this project that currently are outside of the Collier County Water & Sewer District Boundary. The areas that are not part of Collier County Water-Sewer District also do not belong to any other Water-Sewer District. Since Public Utilities can provide service as requested by this project, Impact Fees will be applied to the entire area to be developed. B. The project shall connect to the CCWSD potable water system at a location to be determined by the CCWSD when capacity is available. C. The project shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a location determined by CCWSD, when capacity is available. D. This future development is located on the zone of the existing South Hawthorn Wellfield for the wellfield-SCRWTP expansion to 20 MGD. The Rules and Regulations for protection of well fields shall be followed. All well sites and pipeline easements located on and close to this development needs to be shown on all future site development plans, PPL or any other site plans applications. VIII PLANNING A. Prior to the issuance of the first residential Development Order in the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, the Base TDR Credits and Early Entry TDR Bonus Credits shall be severed and redeemed from all Sending Lands to be preserved within one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe and the filing of executed Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s)shall occur for these same lands. B. A permanent conservation mechanism, including Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s), [shall] be attached/applied to all Sending Lands to be preserved beyond one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe prior to final approval of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) for the Hacienda Lakes project. IX SWAMP BUGGY DAYS RECREATION AND SPORTS PARK PUD GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS The following commitments shall only apply to the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts: General Provisions A. All motor racing shall normally be limited to weekends and holidays. No motor racing or practice will commence earlier than 9:00 a.m. and all racing shall be completed no later than 1 1:00 p.m. B. The shooting and archery ranges shall meet accepted design standards regarding safety and shall be operated and maintained in accordance with accepted safe practices. For security and safety, access to the shooting and archery range areas shall be limited by fencing or other suitable barriers. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 72 of 79 BCC Approved 10/25/I 1 Page 574 of 6526 C. Fencing and/or other suitable barriers will be provided on the site by the Owner for security, safety,and traffic control. Roadways and Traffic A. Roadways within the subject property shall be private roadways and shall be maintained by the Owner. Therefore, said roadways shall be constructed and surfaced in accordance with accepted practices and as permitted by the County Engineer. B. For special events such as the Swamp Buggy races, and as deemed necessary by the County Sheriff, the Owner will arrange for special traffic control at the intersection of the main entrance road with CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Utilities and Service Facilities A. The potable water supply source for the project shall be the County regional water system (now known as the Collier County Water Sewer District). B. Permanent sanitary facilities shall be provided for everyday use by administrative and other personnel. Treatment and disposal of wastewater from said facilities shall be by septic tank/drainfield, or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies. C. Sanitary facilities for spectators and participants at scheduled events shall consist of portable toilets (provided by a licensed commercial service), or permanent restroom facilities, or both. Wastewater from any permanent facilities provided for spectator use shall be stored in a buried holding tank of suitable capacity and subsequently removed and disposed of offsite by a licensed commercial service; or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies. D. Onsite water well or wells may be constructed (as permitted) for flooding of the Swamp Buggy track and other non-potable uses. X DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD and DRI monitoring until close-out of the PUD and DRI, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD/DRI commitments until close-out of the PUD and DRI. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD and DRI by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Hacienda Lakes,PUDZ-2006-AR-I0146 Page 73 of 79 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 575 of 6526 Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD and DRI are closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD and DRI commitments. CP\I 0-CPS-01024\119 Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 74 of 79 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 576 of 6526 EXHIBIT HACIENDA LAKES PUD IMASTERUSEANDCONVERSIONLIST FOR SDP/PLAT/BUILDING PERMITS APPROVED USES including square footages) APPROVED RESIDENTIAL USES(SDP&PLAT&BUILDING PERMIT) TOTAL RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY MANDATED OR PROJECT DATE PERMIT# DISTRICT UNITS RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL NON-MANDATED TOTAL NOTE: IF BUILDING DUPLEX ON ONE LOT,ADD SECOND UNIT AT BUILDING PERMIT APPROVED COMMERCIAL USES IN GROSS FLOOR AREA(SDPs) TOTAL TOTAL PROJECT DATE PERMIT# DISTRICT RETAIL OFFICE TOTAL BP HOTEL TOTAL I of 5 Page 75 of 79 Page 577 of 6526 APPROVED CONVERSIONS(SDPs&PLAT) FROM USE TO USE DATE PERMIT# QUANTITY) QUANTITY) FROM DISTRICT TO DISTRICT ATTACHMENTS: RESIDENTIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP/PLAT/BUILDING PERMIT COMMERCIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP 2of5 Page76of79 Page 578 of 6526 HACIENDA LAKES PUD RESIDENTIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP/PLAT/BUILDING PERMIT TOTAL PROJECT RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 1,760 [UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI-FAMILY] MANDATED UNITS BY GMP 17 IN C DISTRICT 13 IN R/MU FROM C 25 IN RMU 55 MANDATED RES UNITS NON-MANDATED UNITS: 1,705 UNITS [UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI-FAMILY IN ENTIRE PUD] REDUCED BY: 1. CARETAKER'S RESIDENCES IN ENTIRE PUD 2. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO RV [UP TO 106 RES UNITS IF 290 RV UNITS ARE DEVELOPED] 1 RES UNIT—2.73 RV UNITS 37 2. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO SENIOR HOUSING [UP TO 112.50 RES UNITS FOR 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IF DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL] 1 RES UNIT=4 SENIOR HOUSING EXCEPT INDEPENDENT LIVING SINGLE FAMILY STYLE UNITS ARE 1 TO 1. AT SDP, DETERMINE WHICH MANDATED RES UNITS OR NON-MANDATED UNITS ARE MULTI-FAMILY AND WHICH ARE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICTS THAT ALLOW RES: C DISTRICT: 17 RES UNITS (MANDATED) R DISTRICT: RMU DISTRICT: 38 UNITS (MANDATED) CONVERSIONS: TO RV IN RV DISTRICT: DEDUCT:UP TO 106 RES UNITS IF 290 RV UNITS ARE DEVELOPED] TO SENIOR HOUSING: DEDUCT UP TO 112.50 IF RES UNITS ARE DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL.] TOTAL: 1,760 Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words struck through are deleted; PL20210001791 Words underlined are added Last Revised: April 21, 2022 Page 77 of 79 Page 579 of 6526 HACIENDA LAKES PUD COMMERCIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP TOTAL PROJECT COMMERCIAL INTENSITY 327,500 RETAIL IN GROSS FLOOR AREA: 70,000 OFFICE 140,000 BP 92,000 HOTEL OF 135 ROOMS BP DISTRICT: A) _ 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES; AND IF HOTEL BUILT HERE AND NOT IN C DISTRICT, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA FOR HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS (HOTEL CONVERSION DISAPPEARS) OR IF NO HOTEL IN BP &NO HOTEL IN C, ADD 60,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES (THIS IS HOTEL CONVERSION) OR B) PRIVATE OR PUBLIC SCHOOL UP TO 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) R/MU DISTRICT: UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF MEDICAL-RELATED USES ALL USES ARE OFFICE USES EXCEPT FOR DRUG STORES AND PROPRIETORY STORES (GROUP 5912) WHICH IS RETAIL] CHECK APPROVED RETAIL IN TRACT C —CAN'T GO OVER 327, 500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL IN THE ENTIRE PUD] CHECK OFFICE IN TRACT C —CAN'T GO OVER 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA IN ENTIRE PUD] TRACT C: 327, 500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL; 1. DEDUCT MEDICAL RETAIL APPROVED IN RMU 2. DEDUCT SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF SENIOR HOUSING NOT DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL UNITS [MAX 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] 4 of 5 Page 78 of 79 Page 580 of 6526 3. UP TO 81,875 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE [= 25% OF TOTAL]; AND IF NO HOTEL IN BP& HOTEL CONVERSION NOT USED IN BP, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS; AND 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE USES 1. DEDUCT UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE IF APPROVED IN RMU DISTRICT CONVERSIONS IN TRACT C: UP TO 25%OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO OFFICE ON A ONE-TO-ONE BASIS [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO SF SENIOR HOUSING ON A ONE-TO-ONE BASIS [MAY HAVE 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] 5of5 Page 79 of 79 Page 581 of 6526 r v 4 ham-F r 40 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Of STATE RON DESANTIS LAUREL M.LEE Governor Secretary of State May 31, 2022 Martha S. Vergara, BMR &VAB Senior Deputy Clerk Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court Comptroller of Collier County 3329 Tamiami Trail E, Suite#401 Naples, Florida 34112 Attention: Ann Jennejohn Dear Martha Vergara: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 2022-18, which was filed in this office on May 27, 2022. Sincerely, Anya Owens Program Administrator ACO/mas R. A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (850) 245-6270 Page 582 of 6526 June 11, 2025 PL20240011559 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.01.B, related to streets in subdivisions, that requires subdivisions to have platted road rights- of-way for streets, to allow private streets to be provided by separate access easements rather than platted road rights-of-way. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c that limits the number of model homes, to allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the various phases or communities within the project. The number of model homes may exceed five for each phase or community within the project but shall not exceed a total of 60 models for the entire MPUD development. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 to allow " boundary marker" signage on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways that provide access to the MPUD. The sign content area for " boundary markers" to be in the Residential Tract R may be 15 feet in height rather than 8 feet in height as limited in LDC Subsection 5.06.02B.6.b. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2. that limits fence or wall heights to six (6') feet, to allow fences or walls to be no greater than eight (8') feet throughout the development. Where associated greater with existing or future public roadways, or Tract A, a 20 foot tall visual screen may be installed as a wall, berm, or wall/ berm combination. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.02.13.G., and 4.06.02.C.5., that requires a six-foot tall opaque architecturally finished masonry wall, or berm, or combination thereof be provided around the boundaries of a business park. Buffering around the proposed Business Park Tract would be as required by the entirety of the referenced sections of the LDC, but the six-foot wall, or berm, or combination thereof will not be required on the Business Park Tract along the frontage of Lord' s Way. Deviation #6 seeks to allow one real estate sign in addition to the real estate signage permitted in LDC Section5.06.02.B.2., that would be erected off-site from the Residential Tract, in the Commercial Tract. Deviation #7 The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain in the present location until: the sign is relocated to allow the construction of the bridge to extend Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and/or a new sign can be permitted in Tract C. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.1. that limits care unit Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 0.45, to allow a care unit FAR of 0.60. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to a residential development with a maximum height of 8 feet, to allow for one (1) ground sign with a maximum height of 13 feet at the entrance to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes as shown on Attachment E- 2, Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Entry Sign Location Map. Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 10 feet for residential entry signage at Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E- 3, Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto. Page 583 of 6526 June 11, 2025 PL20240011559 Page 2 of 3 Deviation #11 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two ( 2) ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet, to allow for one ( 1) total ground or wall sign with a maximum sign area of 80 square feet at the entrance to the Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E- 3, Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto. Deviation #12 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead-end streets, to allow one (1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development, as depicted on Exhibit E-3, Sign Location Map, Sheet 3 of 3, attached hereto. Deviation #13 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.02.F, which requires that off-street parking must be arranged so that no motor vehicles have to back onto any street, excluding single- family and two- family residential dwellings and churches, to allow for back out parking from the proposed off-street parking for multi-family dwellings within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development, as depicted on Exhibit B-2, attached hereto. Deviation #14 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 12 feet for residential entry signage at Hacienda Lakes - North Area as depicted on Exhibit E- 4, Hacienda Lakes - North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 2 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #15 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet, to allow for two (2) ground or wall signs that are 64 square feet each. which include signage for each of the residential developments which share access to Collier Boulevard at the entrance to the Hacienda Lakes - North Area, as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1of 2, attached hereto. This deviation is subject to conditions that secondary signage is specifically for the two "R" Tract properties labeled "Future Development" that are immediately fronting and adjacent to the intersection of the entry road with Collier Boulevard, and no other signage for these two "R" Tract properties is permitted facing Collier Boulevard. Deviation #16 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.14, which allows boundary marker signs to be a maximum of 24 square feet to allow for two boundary marker signs with a maximum of 32 square feet at the Hacienda Lakes – North Area, as depicted on Exhibit B -4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #17 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead-end streets except when designed as a cul-de-sac, to allow one (1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Hacienda Lakes - North Area residential development, as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes - North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #18 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, which requires landscape buffers to separate developments, to allow for no buffer along the northern PUD boundary in either or both of the following circumstances: 1) West of the FPL easement if the abutting properties are rezoned or amended to provide for a unified development plan of the northern property (currently Agriculture- zoned property) and the Hacienda Lakes - North Area properties prior to approval of an SDP or PPL; 2) East of the FPL easement if the abutting property to the north (currently Willow Run RPUD) is rezoned to provide for no adjacent buffer, as depicted on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. Deviation #19 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, which permits a maximum fence/ wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts, to instead allow for a decorative wall with maximum height of 14 feet in the location shown on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. Page 584 of 6526 June 11, 2025 PL20240011559 Page 3 of 3 DEVIATIONS #20 THROUGH #25 APPLY TO THE WESTERN 25.86 (+/-) ACRES OF TRACT G OF THE HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES PLAT RECORDED IN PB 55 PAGE 19, LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD AND COLLIER BOULEVARD (THE “COSTCO PARCEL”) Deviation #20 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.08, which requires a maximum light pole height of 25 feet, to instead allow a new maximum height of 36.5 feet. Deviation #21 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04.C, which requires commercial projects with a minimum 80 parking spaces and off-street parking in excess of 120% to obtain a variance and provide double the landscaping required in interior vehicular use areas, to instead not require a variance and only provide the landscaping required in interior vehicular use areas as required in LDC Section 4.06.03 without doubling the required landscaping. Deviation #22 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.06.B, which requires minimum loading spaces of 3, plus 1 for each 25,000 square feet over 50,000 square feet, to instead allow for a total amount of 5 loading spaces. Deviation #23 seeks relief from LDC Section 05.05.08.D.2.b.i, which requires a total of 45% glazing (‘glass’) on the total three combined primary façades of the building, to instead allow a combination of glazing and planted trellis features for a total of 23% (12% glazing and 11% planted trellis). Deviation #24 seeks relief from LDC Section 05.05.08.D.4, which requires variations in building façade massing greater than 150 linear feet for buildings 40,000 square feet or larger, to include a break in the façade massing, to instead allow structurally attached planted trellis features as an alternative to provide an elevation break out for visual interest along the building façade length. Deviation #25 seeks relief from LDC Section 05.06.04.F.4, which requires a maximum signage square footage in nonresidential districts of 750 square feet, to instead allow for an increase of 367 square feet over the maximum for a total of 1,117 square feet as shown on Exhibit E-6, Costco Warehouse Signage Elevation Exhibit. Page 585 of 6526 EXHIBIT F LIST OF OWNER COMMITMENTS Revised text to Section VI (Transportation), XI in Ordinance 22-18: XI. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 75,000 square feet of retail land uses, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop/ shelter fronting the Commercial Tract C that shall include a 10' x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop/ shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site-related contribution with the exception for the Costco Wholesale development (PL20240011790 and PL20240011559) that defers the requirement to the future retail commercial outparcel at the southeast corner of Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Road to better serve the public that utilize public transportation for a variety of retail uses. Page 586 of 6526 Docusign Envelope ID: 4346C63D-0709-4094-8A70-D1FCFEB4B14B AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) Costco Wholesale POI and ASW Applications I, Rainey L. Astin (print name), as Assistant Secretary (title, if applicable} of Costco Wholesale Corporatjon (company, If applicable}, swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one} ownerc=J applicantOcontract purchaser0and that: ;,Notes: 1 _ I have full authority to secure the approval(s} requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2.All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3.I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4.The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5.We/I authorizeDriver McAfee Hawthorne & Diebenow, PLLC to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. •If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. •If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L. C.) or Limited Company (L. C.), then the do cuments sho uld typically be signed by the Company's uManaging Member." •If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnersh ip_ •If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. •If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee n. •In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e_g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Au thorization and that the facti111�11J�d in it are true. c���� Signature � N\a(l� ' ' � OF FLORIDA-'lf L'itlr\cD.., 2/24/2025 Date COUNTY OF-G8�u,.("\ The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of D physi ca_l...eresence or m'6nliqe notarization thisa day of 1i?J,z(\A� , 20.z5, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) �1 '1':J �f7 r1 Su�erson(s) Notary Public must check app licable box: CB'Are personally known to me D Has produced a current drivers license _____ _ D Has produced ________ as identification. Notary Signature: __ Ce:.::::.1..����:i..-.._..,...i.C�:vJ;....z.::::;0 ..)o,_, ... d�----- Caroline Amlreh Commonwealth of Virginia · ", ... , Notary Public' ,:>< •• 'Coim,isston No. 00341120 My ComnuslOn E.lpies 10/31f202II PL20240011559 & PL20240011790 Page 587 of 6526 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT/SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE The undersigned, John Sullivan, hereby certifies as follows: 1)I am the duly elected Executive Vice President and Secretary of Costco Wholesale Corporation, a Washington corporation (the "Corporation"). 2)Rainey Astin has been duly elected to and holds the office of Assistant Secretary. 3)I certify that the following resolution was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on January 27, 2011: RESOLVED, that any one of the Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer, the President, the Chief Financial Officer, any Executive or Senior Vice President, the Secretary, the Treasurer, or any Assistant Secretary of the Corporation is hereby authorized to execute any and all documents regarding the acquisition, leasing, sale or development of real property, including, without limitation, the execution of purchase agreements, deeds, escrow instructions, leases, closing statements, easements, deeds of dedication, restrictive covenants and construction agreements. I further certify that said Resolution remains in full force and effect as of the date hereof. Dated this __ day of January, 2025. John Sullivan Executive Vice President/Secretary Page 588 of 6526 Page 589 of 6526 Addressing Checklist 6/14/2024 Page 1 of 2 Growth Management Community Development • Operations & Regulatory Management 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • www.colliercountyfl.gov/ Addressing Checklist GMCD Public Portal Land Development Code Administrative Code Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with a * are required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. *Name of Owner/Agent: Firm [if agent]: *Address:*City:*State:*ZIP: *Telephone:Cell:Fax: *E-Mail Address: *Folio (Property ID) Number(s) of the subject property or properties [Attach list if necessary]: *Legal Description of subject property or properties [Attach list if necessary]: Street Address(es) where applicable, if already assigned: Applicant Contact Information Location Information Page 590 of 6526 Collier County Addressing Checklist 6/14/2024 Page 2 of 2 Growth Management Community Development • Operations & Regulatory Management 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • www.colliercountyfl.gov/ Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre-approval of project name and/or street name may be requested by contacting us at GMD_Addressing@colliercountyfl.gov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. Current Project Name: Proposed Project Name: Proposed Street Name: Latest Approved Project Number [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include. Checkmark the items included with this application: Requirements for Review: Required: LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. ☒ List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. ☐ E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre-approved project and/or street names.☐ Project Information Submittal Requirement Checklist The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department | GMCD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: Front.Desk@colliercountyfl.gov Page 591 of 6526 rCounty � - Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 I Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a.If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL. tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b.If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership �c.. (Y")l\-r. �-r "--•l�.(')r \ l ll c.If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership 01/2023 Page 1 of3 Page 592 of 6526 N/A Page 593 of 6526 r�unty ..... - Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239} 252-1036 I Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov Date of option: f�-12- ZQZ4 Date option terminates: N/A. . or Anticipated closing date: AIJt,. 20 2D25 AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest-holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMO Portal: https:// cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov / cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov �$ Who/ts�Ctv� fti,��,�ki �d � �Ut- Agent/0 01/2023 Page 3 of 3 Revised Dec. 13, 2024 Page 594 of 6526 Page 595 of 6526 Page 596 of 6526 Page 597 of 6526 AERIAL MAP & PICTURES MAY 2024 | CW20-0503 | STONE MTN, GASEPTEMBER 2024 | CW23-0757 | COLLIER COUNTY FL (SOUTH NAPLES) 4 1 1 2 3 4 32 RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD COLLIER BVLDPage 598 of 6526 RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD/CR 864 COLLIER BOULEVARD (COUNTY ROAD 951)PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL LAKE 13 ±0.50 ACRES FUTURE OUTPARCEL ±4.1 ACRES V V VV V V V V V V V V 20'20'20' 45' 126' 20' 60' 30'61'50'327.7'30'30'20' 20' 20' 20' 30' 30'20'10'10'10' 10'R55'7'12.5'52.5'61'43.9'24'10' 10' 10' 10' 10'63.5'96.5' 10.98' 111.9'204'33.4'112.6'162,671 SF 20'2 0 ' 49' 18' 18' 18' 20' 37'20'12' 15' 4'50'50'11'7.8'6'5.9'7.4'11'15'15'5.9'15'15' 20'20'30'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'7'20'30'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'7'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'24'20'20'24'20'11.5'24' 10'30'11.5' 8' 18.5' 495.5'20'24' 24' 24' 24'24'15'9.3'7' 24' 10' 28'92.5' 11.5' COSTCO DEMISED AREA BUILDING SETBACK LINE PROPOSED FULL ACCESS DRIVEWAY PROPOSED RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT DRIVEWAY PROPOSED RIGHT-IN / LEFT-OUT ACCESS DRIVEWAY RELOCATED STONE FPL SERVICE ROAD FUTURE FUEL FACILITY EXPANSION PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB (TYP.) PROPOSED CONCRETE STEP OFF CURB (TYP.)PROPOSED PAINTED WHITE STRIPPING, 4" WIDE (TYP.) PROPOSED CONCRETE STEP OFF CURB (TYP.) PROPOSED CONCRETE STEP OFF CURB (TYP.) PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT JOINT PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT JOINT PROPOSED PAINTED WHITE STRIPPING, 4" WIDE (TYP.) PROPOSED PAINTED WHITE STRIPPING, 4" WIDE (TYP.) PROPOSED CONCRETE STEP OFF CURB (TYP.) PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB (TYP.) THREE (3) - 40,000 GALLON FUEL STORAGE TANKS PROPOSED TRASH COMPACTOR FUEL FACILITY KIOSK (197 SF) PROPOSED MASONRY COMPACTOR SCREENING WITH METAL GATE PROPOSED STRUCTURALLY ATTACHED AND PLANTED TRELLIS (TYP) PROPOSED STRUCTURALLY ATTACHED AND PLANTED TRELLIS (TYP) PROPOSED GENERATORS BUILDING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 20' 210' DECELERATION RIGHT TURN LANE 210' DECELERATION RIGHT TURN LANE OUTPARCEL ACCESS DRIVE OUTPARCEL ACCESS DRIVE WHEEL STOP (TYP) LIGHT POLE BASE (TYP) FOUR (4) LOADING SPACES ONE (1) LOADING SPACE PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP) PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP) FUEL FACILITY GENERATOR FUEL FACILITY ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER WITH BOLLARDS R25' R65' R56' R56' R56' R56' R25' R25' R25' R25' R45' R45' R74' R74' R74' R74' R85' R50' 12'12' 5' R25' R50'R35' R35' R50' R50'R35' R50' R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R35'R10' R20' R20' R35' R15' R25' R35' R25' R15' R20' R25' R10' R25'R2' R43' R65' R26' R30' R47.5' R10' R50' R60' R43' R50' R70' R100' R40' R15' R50' R65' R25' PROPOSED STRUCTURALLY ATTACHED AND PLANTED TRELLIS (TYP) R35' R3' 'LEFT ONLY' SIGN R25' R5' R20' Engineering & Design Architecture, Landscape Architecture,Surveying, CT P.C.Engineering& Design, Engineering & Design Architecture, Landscape Architecture,Surveying, CT P.C.Engineering& Design, UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO A SURVEY OR ENGINEERING MAP BEARING A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209, SUB-DIVISION 2, OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW.ONLY MAPS WITH THE LAND SURVEYOR OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S SEAL ARE GENUINE TRUE AND CORRECT COPIES OF THE LAND SURVEYOR OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER’S ORIGINAL WORK AND OPINION.REVDATEDRAWN BYDESCRIPTIONSHEET NUMBER: SCALE: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY:DATE: DRAWING NAME: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE: PROTECT YOURSELF Copyright © 2025. Colliers Engineering & Design All Rights Reserved. This drawing and all the information contained herein is authorized for use only by the party for whom the services were contracted or to whom it is certified. This drawing may not be copied, reused, disclosed, distributed or relied upon for any other purpose without the express written consent of Colliers Engineering & Design. ALL STATES REQUIRE NOTIFICATION OF EXCAVATORS, DESIGNERS, OR ANY PERSON PREPARING TO DISTURB THE EARTH'S SURFACE ANYWHERE IN ANY STATE FOR STATE SPECIFIC DIRECT PHONE NUMBERS VISIT: WWW.CALL811.COM C-LAYT 2024\24000317A\Engineering\Site Plans\C-LAYT.dwg\C-03-Dimension Plan By: SDONLEVIER REVIEWED BY: NOTE: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION. CITY OF PITTSBURGHDEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNINGAPPROVED: _______________________ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION _______________________ CHAIRMANATTEST: _______________________ _______________________SECRETARY Phone: www.colliersengineering.com C O N S U L T I N G ENGINEERS + SURVEYING REVDATEDRAWN BYDESCRIPTIONSITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA AS SHOWN 01/17/25 SVD RTM 24000317A 18101/31/25SVDREVISED PER FPL COMMENTS202/27/25JEHREVISED PER PDI REVIEW DATED 02/12/25303/18/25SVDREVISED PER COUNTY SUFFICIENCY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 01/27/25....................................................................___________________________ of FOR PTH EXTON 410 Eagleview Boulevard, Suite 104 Exton, PA 19341 610.254.9140 COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS MASER CONSULTING Doing Business as Russell T. McFall II FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LICENSE NUMBER: PE75738 COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC. N S EW NORTH50 50 100 SCALE : 1" = 50' 0 Linear unit of measure: US Survey Foot (1 ft = 1200/3937 m) DIMENSION PLAN 3 LEGENDEXISTING PROPOSED TRAVERSE LINE, CENTER LINE OR BASELINE (LABEL AS SUCH) RIGHT OF WAY LINE PROPERTY LINE EDGE OF PAVEMENT CURB DEPRESSED CURB SIDEWALK FENCES TREELINE ROADWAY SIGNS WETLAND LINE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY LINE X X X X 13+0012+00 BACK FACE 10 VHC STALL COUNT ADA ACCESSIBLE STALL DEPRESSED CURB AND ADA RAMP DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW 1.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS KNOWN AS PORTION OF TRACT 'G' OF HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, TRACT G REPLAT, PLAT BOOK 55, PAGES 10 THROUGH 21. 2.THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE HACIENDA LAKES MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONE DISTRICT AND CONTAINS A TOTAL TRACT AREA OF ±1,125,715 SF, ±25.84 ACRES. OWNER:HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC APPLICANT:COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 7742 ALICO ROAD 45940 HORSESHOE DRIVE, SUITE 150 FORT MYERS, FL 33912 STERLING, VA 20166 904-762-4454 703-885-4002 3.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS PRESENTLY UNDEVELOPED, HEAVILY WOODED LAND WITH A CLEARED UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE EASTERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CLEAR THE REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY AND FILL IT IN TO CONSTRUCT A COSTCO WHOLESALE WAREHOUSE WITH A FUEL FACILITY, PARKING LOTS, AND OTHER ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE. 4.ZONE DATA: MPUD - MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (E) = PRE-EXISTING NON-CONFORMING CONDITION (V) = VARIANCE REQUIRED * = VALUES ARE ALLOTMENTS FOR THE FUTURE AND ARE NOT A PART OF THIS SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5.THE FOLLOWING DEVIATIONS (PER AMENDED EXHIBIT E LIST OF DEVIATIONS TO ORD. 22-18) ARE BEING REQUESTED AS A PART OF AUTO SERVICE STATION WAIVER (ASW) PL20240011790 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE (PDI) PL20240011559: 5.1.DEVIATION #20 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.02.08, WHICH REQUIRES A MAXIMUM LIGHT POLE HEIGHT OF 25 FT, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A NEW MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36.5 FT. 5.2.DEVIATION #21 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.05.04.C, WHICH REQUIRES COMMERCIAL PROJECTS WITH A MINIMUM 80 PARKING SPACES AND OFF-STREET PARKING IN EXCESS OF 120% TO OBTAIN A VARIANCE AND PROVIDE DOUBLE THE LANDSCAPING REQUIRED IN INTERIOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS, TO INSTEAD NOT REQUIRE A VARIANCE AND ONLY PROVIDE THE NORMAL LANDSCAPING REQUIRED IN INTERIOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS AS REQUIRED IN LDC SECTION 4.06.03. 5.3.DEVIATION #22 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.05.06.B, WHICH REQUIRES MINIMUM LOADING SPACES OF 3, PLUS 1 FOR EACH 25,000 SF OVER 50,000 SF, TO INSTEAD ALLOW FOR A TOTAL OF 5 LOADING SPACES. 5.4.DEVIATION #23 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5.05.05.B.1, WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM 500 FT SEPARATION BETWEEN FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A MAXIMUM 132 FT SEPARATION BETWEEN THE COSTCO PARCEL AND THE 7-ELEVEN PARCEL LOCATED TO THE NORTH, SEPARATED BY RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD, A 4-LANE ARTERIAL. 5.5.DEVIATION #24 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.05.08.D.2.b.i, WHICH REQUIRES A TOTAL OF 45% GLAZING (GLASS) ON THE TOTAL COMBINED PRIMARY FACADES OF THE BUILDING, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A COMBINATION OF GLAZING AND PLANTED TRELLIS FEATURES TO ACCOUNT FOR A TOTAL OF 23% (12% GLAZING & 11% PLANTED TRELLIS). 5.6.DEVIATION #25 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.05.08.D.4, WHICH REQUIRES VARIATIONS IN BUILDING FACADE MASSING GREATER THAN 150 LINEAR FEET TO INCLUDE A BREAK IN THE FACADE MASSING, TO INSTEAD ALLOW STRUCTURALLY ATTACHED PLANTED TRELLIS FEATURES AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO PROVIDE AN ELEVATION BREAK OUT FOR VISUAL INTEREST ALONG THE BUILDING FACADE LENGTH. 5.7.DEVIATION #26 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.06.04.F.4, WHICH REQUIRES A MAXIMUM SIGNAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN NONRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS OF 750 SF, TO INSTEAD ALLOW FOR AN INCREASE OF 367 SF OVER THE MAXIMUM FOR A TOTAL OF 1,117 SF. 6.BOUNDARY SURVEY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS TAKEN FROM A PLAN ENTITLED “ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR COSTCO WHOLESALE”, DATED JANUARY 3, 2024, PREPARED BY COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN. 7.THE HORIZONTAL DATUM IS RELATIVE TO THE FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD1983 EAST (2011 ADJUSTMENT). THE VERTICAL DATUM IS RELATIVE TO NAVD 1988. 8.BENCHMARK REFERENCE: NGS BENCHMARK STAMP Y 526, ELEVATION: 11.42' (NAVD 1988). 9.THE LIMITS OF FRESHWATER WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED “ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR COSTCO WHOLESALE”, DATED JANUARY 3, 2024, PREPARED BY COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN AND IS PRELIMINARY AND WAITING FOR FINAL APPROVAL. 10.THE FLOOD ZONES DEPICTED HERON ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED “ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR COSTCO WHOLESALE”, DATED JANUARY 3, 2024, PREPARED BY COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN WHICH WAS PLOTTED BASED ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 12021C0606J, LAST REVISED FEBRUARY 8, 2024. 11.GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION AND SOIL TEST PIT LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE AS PRESENTED IN A REPORT ENTITLED “COSTCO WHOLESALE WAREHOUSE: NAPLES, FL - CW23-1027 - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT”, DATED MARCH 27, 2024, PREPARED BY TERRACON. 12.THIS SET OF PLANS IS NOT DEPICTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS OR A CERTIFICATION/WARRANTY REGARDING THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY IMPACTED SITE CONDITIONS. 13.THIS IS A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ELSEWHERE HEREON, IS NOT A SURVEY. 14.DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS AS THEY PERTAIN TO ADJACENT AND SURROUNDING PHYSICAL CONDITIONS, BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, ETC. THEY ARE SCHEMATIC ONLY, EXCEPT WHERE DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN THERETO. 15.THIS SET OF PLANS HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSES OF MUNICIPAL AND AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL. THIS SET OF PLANS SHALL NOT BE UTILIZED AS CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS UNTIL ALL APPROVALS REQUIRED HAVE BEEN OBTAINED, ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL HAVE BEEN SATISFIED AND THE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN STAMPED “ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION”. THIS SHALL INCLUDE APPROVAL OF ALL CATALOG CUTS, SHOP DRAWINGS AND/OR DESIGN CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT OWNER AND/OR MUNICIPAL ENGINEER. 16.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROJECT SAFETY, INCLUDING PROVISION OF ALL APPROPRIATE SAFETY DEVICES AND TRAINING REQUIRED. 17.PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL 811 TO REQUEST A UTILITY MARKOUT. 18.THE COSTCO WAREHOUSE BUILDING WILL BE OF TYPE V-B CONSTRUCTION AND THE COSTCO FUEL FACILITY WILL BE OF TYPE II-B CONSTRUCTION. SITE NOTES 1.BUILDING FOOTPRINT DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE. FINAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT DIMENSIONS FOR EACH BUILDING SHALL BE FURNISHED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS WHEN APPLYING FOR A BUILDING PERMIT. ALL STRUCTURES SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROVED BULK ZONING REQUIREMENTS. 2.CURB RAMPS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED FLUSH WITH THE FINISHED PAVEMENT SURFACE. ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPS INSTALLED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY ARE TO HAVE DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES COMPLIANT WITH FEDERAL ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC ROW. 3.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE/STRIPING SHALL CORRESPOND TO THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. 4.REFUSE AND RECYCLABLES SHALL BE STORED WITHIN OUTSIDE SCREENED COMPACTORS AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND PICKED UP BY PRIVATE WASTE DISPOSAL HAULER. 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPER DISPOSAL OF ALL WASTE MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING REGULATIONS AND AGENCIES. 6.THERE SHALL BE NO ON-SITE BURIAL OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, TREE BRANCHES, STUMPS, OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS. 7.MATERIALS, WORKMANSHIP, AND CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH: A.THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, LATEST VERSION. B.FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION," LATEST VERSION. C.CURRENT PREVAILING MUNICIPAL, COUNTY, AND/OR STATE AGENCY SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, CONDITIONS, AND REQUIREMENTS. D.CURRENT PREVAILING UTILITY COMPANY/AUTHORITY SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, AND REQUIREMENTS. E.CURRENT MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, AND REQUIREMENTS. REQUIRED EXISTING COSTCO FUTURE OUTPARCEL MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 SF ±1,125,715 SF ±25.84 ACRES 949,044 SF 21.79 ACRES 176,677 SF 4.06 ACRES MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FT 1,235 FT 1,114 FT 253 FT PRINCIPAL BUILDING MINIMUM YARD (FROM LOT BOUNDARY)25 FT N/A 52.5 FT T.B.D. MINIMUM YARD (FROM MPUD BOUNDARY)25 FT N/A 61 FT T.B.D. MAXIMUM ZONED BUILDING HEIGHT 50 FT N/A 34 FT T.B.D. MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 60 FT N/A 34 FT T.B.D. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 600 SF N/A 162,671 SF T.B.D. MINIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT 600 SF N/A 162,671 SF T.B.D. ACCESSORY BUILDING MINIMUM YARD (FROM LOT BOUNDARY)10 FT N/A 111.9 FT T.B.D. MINIMUM YARD (FROM MPUD BOUNDARY)10 FT N/A 204 FT T.B.D. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 10 FT N/A N/A T.B.D. MAXIMUM ZONED BUILDING HEIGHT 25 FT N/A 8.92 FT T.B.D. MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 30 FT N/A 8.92 FT T.B.D. MINIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT 80 SF N/A 197 SF T.B.D. MAXIMUM BUILDING (LOT) COVERAGE N/A 0.00%17.2%25.5% * MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE N/A 1.48%71.4%51.0% * BUFFER 10 FT 10.98 FT 11 FT T.B.D. PARKING USE: 1 SPACE/250 SF RETAIL/OFFICE AREAS 652 SPACES 0 SPACES 819 SPACES T.B.D. LOADING PER TABLE 18 IN COLLIER COUNTY LD CODE SECTION 4.05.06.B 8 SPACES 0 SPACES 5 SPACES (V)T.B.D. ADA SPACES 2% TOTAL 0 SPACES 17 SPACES T.B.D. BUILDING AREA N/A 107 SF 162,868 SF 45,061 SF* NON-BUILDING IMPERVIOUS AREA N/A 16,541 SF 514,612 SF 45,028 SF* LAKE/WETLAND AREA N/A 848,716 SF 18,515 SF 3,265 SF* GREEN AREA N/A 260,352 SF 253,049 SF 83,323 SF* GENERAL NOTES 09/01/22MCNJ-CVER-NOTE-1000 MOD: 09/10/24 5.THE FOLLOWING DEVIATIONS (PER AMENDED EXHIBIT E LIST OF DEVIATIONS TO ORD. 22-18) ARE BEING REQUESTED AS A PART OF AUTO SERVICE STATION WAIVER (ASW) PL20240011790 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE (PDI) PL20240011559: 5.1.DEVIATION #20 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.02.08, WHICH REQUIRES A MAXIMUM LIGHT POLE HEIGHT OF 25 FT, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A NEW MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36.5 FT. 5.2.DEVIATION #21 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.05.04.C, WHICH REQUIRES COMMERCIAL PROJECTS WITH A MINIMUM 80 PARKING SPACES AND OFF-STREET PARKING IN EXCESS OF 120% TO OBTAIN A VARIANCE AND PROVIDE DOUBLE THE LANDSCAPING REQUIRED IN INTERIOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS, TO INSTEAD NOT REQUIRE A VARIANCE AND ONLY PROVIDE THE NORMAL LANDSCAPING REQUIRED IN INTERIOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS AS REQUIRED IN LDC SECTION 4.06.03. 5.3.DEVIATION #22 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.05.06.B, WHICH REQUIRES MINIMUM LOADING SPACES OF 3, PLUS 1 FOR EACH 25,000 SF OVER 50,000 SF, TO INSTEAD ALLOW FOR A TOTAL OF 5 LOADING SPACES. 5.4.DEVIATION #23 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5.05.05.B.1, WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM 500 FT SEPARATION BETWEEN FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A MAXIMUM 132 FT SEPARATION BETWEEN THE COSTCO PARCEL AND THE 7-ELEVEN PARCEL LOCATED TO THE NORTH, SEPARATED BY RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD, A 4-LANE ARTERIAL. 5.5.DEVIATION #24 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.05.08.D.2.b.i, WHICH REQUIRES A TOTAL OF 45% GLAZING ('GLASS') ON THE TOTAL COMBINED PRIMARY FACADES OF THE BUILDING, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A COMBINATION OF GLAZING AND PLANTED TRELLIS FEATURES TO ACCOUNT FOR A TOTAL OF 23% (12% GLAZING & 11% PLANTED TRELLIS). 5.6.DEVIATION #25 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.05.08.D.4, WHICH REQUIRES VARIATIONS IN BUILDING FACADE MASSING GREATER THAN 150 LINEAR FEET TO INCLUDE A BREAK IN THE FACADE MASSING, TO INSTEAD ALLOW STRUCTURALLY ATTACHED PLANTED TRELLIS FEATURES AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO PROVIDE AN ELEVATION BREAK OUT FOR VISUAL INTEREST ALONG THE BUILDING FACADE LENGTH. 5.7.DEVIATION #26 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.06.04.F.4, WHICH REQUIRES A MAXIMUM SIGNAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN NONRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS OF 750 SF, TO INSTEAD ALLOW FOR AN INCREASE OF 367 SF OVER THE MAXIMUM FOR A TOTAL OF 1,117 SF. BUFFER PER LDC BUFFER PER LDC BUFFER PER LDC BUFFER PER LDC (PENDING FPL APPROVAL) BUFFER PER LDC Page 599 of 6526 RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD/CR 864 COLLIER BOULEVARD (COUNTY ROAD 951)PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL LAKE 13 ±0.50 ACRES FUTURE OUTPARCEL ±4.1 ACRES V V VV V V V V V V V V 20'20'20' 45' 126' 20' 60' 30'61'50'327.7'30'30'20' 20' 20' 20' 30' 30'20'10'10'10' 10'R55'7'12.5'52.5'61'43.9'24'10' 10' 10' 10' 10'63.5'96.5' 10.98' 111.9'204'33.4'112.6'162,671 SF 20'2 0 ' 49' 18' 18' 18' 20' 37'20'12' 15' 4'50'50'11'7.8'6'5.9'7.4'11'15'15'5.9'15'15' 20'20'30'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'7'20'30'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'7'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'24'20'20'24'20'11.5'24' 10'30'11.5' 8' 18.5' 495.5'20'24' 24' 24' 24'24'15'9.3'7' 24' 10' 28'92.5' 11.5' COSTCO DEMISED AREA BUILDING SETBACK LINE PROPOSED FULL ACCESS DRIVEWAY PROPOSED RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT DRIVEWAY PROPOSED RIGHT-IN / LEFT-OUT ACCESS DRIVEWAY RELOCATED STONE FPL SERVICE ROAD FUTURE FUEL FACILITY EXPANSION PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB (TYP.) PROPOSED CONCRETE STEP OFF CURB (TYP.)PROPOSED PAINTED WHITE STRIPPING, 4" WIDE (TYP.) PROPOSED CONCRETE STEP OFF CURB (TYP.) PROPOSED CONCRETE STEP OFF CURB (TYP.) PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT JOINT PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT JOINT PROPOSED PAINTED WHITE STRIPPING, 4" WIDE (TYP.) PROPOSED PAINTED WHITE STRIPPING, 4" WIDE (TYP.) PROPOSED CONCRETE STEP OFF CURB (TYP.) PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB (TYP.) THREE (3) - 40,000 GALLON FUEL STORAGE TANKS PROPOSED TRASH COMPACTOR FUEL FACILITY KIOSK (197 SF) PROPOSED MASONRY COMPACTOR SCREENING WITH METAL GATE PROPOSED STRUCTURALLY ATTACHED AND PLANTED TRELLIS (TYP) PROPOSED STRUCTURALLY ATTACHED AND PLANTED TRELLIS (TYP) PROPOSED GENERATORS BUILDING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 20' 210' DECELERATION RIGHT TURN LANE 210' DECELERATION RIGHT TURN LANE OUTPARCEL ACCESS DRIVE OUTPARCEL ACCESS DRIVE WHEEL STOP (TYP) LIGHT POLE BASE (TYP) FOUR (4) LOADING SPACES ONE (1) LOADING SPACE PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP) PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP) FUEL FACILITY GENERATOR FUEL FACILITY ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER WITH BOLLARDS R25' R65' R56' R56' R56' R56' R25' R25' R25' R25' R45' R45' R74' R74' R74' R74' R85' R50' 12'12' 5' R25' R50'R35' R35' R50' R50'R35' R50' R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R35'R10' R20' R20' R35' R15' R25' R35' R25' R15' R20' R25' R10' R25'R2' R43' R65' R26' R30' R47.5' R10' R50' R60' R43' R50' R70' R100' R40' R15' R50' R65' R25' PROPOSED STRUCTURALLY ATTACHED AND PLANTED TRELLIS (TYP) R35' R3' 'LEFT ONLY' SIGN R25' R5' R20' Engineering & Design Architecture, Landscape Architecture,Surveying, CT P.C.Engineering& Design, Engineering & Design Architecture, Landscape Architecture,Surveying, CT P.C.Engineering& Design, UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO A SURVEY OR ENGINEERING MAP BEARING A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209, SUB-DIVISION 2, OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW.ONLY MAPS WITH THE LAND SURVEYOR OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S SEAL ARE GENUINE TRUE AND CORRECT COPIES OF THE LAND SURVEYOR OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER’S ORIGINAL WORK AND OPINION.REVDATEDRAWN BYDESCRIPTIONSHEET NUMBER: SCALE: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY:DATE: DRAWING NAME: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE: PROTECT YOURSELF Copyright © 2025. Colliers Engineering & Design All Rights Reserved. This drawing and all the information contained herein is authorized for use only by the party for whom the services were contracted or to whom it is certified. This drawing may not be copied, reused, disclosed, distributed or relied upon for any other purpose without the express written consent of Colliers Engineering & Design. ALL STATES REQUIRE NOTIFICATION OF EXCAVATORS, DESIGNERS, OR ANY PERSON PREPARING TO DISTURB THE EARTH'S SURFACE ANYWHERE IN ANY STATE FOR STATE SPECIFIC DIRECT PHONE NUMBERS VISIT: WWW.CALL811.COM C-LAYT 2024\24000317A\Engineering\Site Plans\C-LAYT.dwg\C-03-Dimension Plan By: SDONLEVIER REVIEWED BY: NOTE: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION. CITY OF PITTSBURGHDEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNINGAPPROVED: _______________________ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION _______________________ CHAIRMANATTEST: _______________________ _______________________SECRETARY Phone: www.colliersengineering.com C O N S U L T I N G ENGINEERS + SURVEYING REVDATEDRAWN BYDESCRIPTIONSITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA AS SHOWN 01/17/25 SVD RTM 24000317A 18101/31/25SVDREVISED PER FPL COMMENTS202/27/25JEHREVISED PER PDI REVIEW DATED 02/12/25303/18/25SVDREVISED PER COUNTY SUFFICIENCY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 01/27/25....................................................................___________________________ of FOR PTH EXTON 410 Eagleview Boulevard, Suite 104 Exton, PA 19341 610.254.9140 COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS MASER CONSULTING Doing Business as Russell T. McFall II FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LICENSE NUMBER: PE75738 COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC. N S EW NORTH50 50 100 SCALE : 1" = 50' 0 Linear unit of measure: US Survey Foot (1 ft = 1200/3937 m) DIMENSION PLAN 3 LEGENDEXISTING PROPOSED TRAVERSE LINE, CENTER LINE OR BASELINE (LABEL AS SUCH) RIGHT OF WAY LINE PROPERTY LINE EDGE OF PAVEMENT CURB DEPRESSED CURB SIDEWALK FENCES TREELINE ROADWAY SIGNS WETLAND LINE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY LINE X X X X 13+0012+00 BACK FACE 10 VHC STALL COUNT ADA ACCESSIBLE STALL DEPRESSED CURB AND ADA RAMP DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW 1.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS KNOWN AS PORTION OF TRACT 'G' OF HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, TRACT G REPLAT, PLAT BOOK 55, PAGES 10 THROUGH 21. 2.THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE HACIENDA LAKES MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONE DISTRICT AND CONTAINS A TOTAL TRACT AREA OF ±1,125,715 SF, ±25.84 ACRES. OWNER:HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC APPLICANT:COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 7742 ALICO ROAD 45940 HORSESHOE DRIVE, SUITE 150 FORT MYERS, FL 33912 STERLING, VA 20166 904-762-4454 703-885-4002 3.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS PRESENTLY UNDEVELOPED, HEAVILY WOODED LAND WITH A CLEARED UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE EASTERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CLEAR THE REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY AND FILL IT IN TO CONSTRUCT A COSTCO WHOLESALE WAREHOUSE WITH A FUEL FACILITY, PARKING LOTS, AND OTHER ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE. 4.ZONE DATA: MPUD - MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (E) = PRE-EXISTING NON-CONFORMING CONDITION (V) = VARIANCE REQUIRED * = VALUES ARE ALLOTMENTS FOR THE FUTURE AND ARE NOT A PART OF THIS SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5.THE FOLLOWING DEVIATIONS (PER AMENDED EXHIBIT E LIST OF DEVIATIONS TO ORD. 22-18) ARE BEING REQUESTED AS A PART OF AUTO SERVICE STATION WAIVER (ASW) PL20240011790 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE (PDI) PL20240011559: 5.1.DEVIATION #20 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.02.08, WHICH REQUIRES A MAXIMUM LIGHT POLE HEIGHT OF 25 FT, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A NEW MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36.5 FT. 5.2.DEVIATION #21 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.05.04.C, WHICH REQUIRES COMMERCIAL PROJECTS WITH A MINIMUM 80 PARKING SPACES AND OFF-STREET PARKING IN EXCESS OF 120% TO OBTAIN A VARIANCE AND PROVIDE DOUBLE THE LANDSCAPING REQUIRED IN INTERIOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS, TO INSTEAD NOT REQUIRE A VARIANCE AND ONLY PROVIDE THE NORMAL LANDSCAPING REQUIRED IN INTERIOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS AS REQUIRED IN LDC SECTION 4.06.03. 5.3.DEVIATION #22 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.05.06.B, WHICH REQUIRES MINIMUM LOADING SPACES OF 3, PLUS 1 FOR EACH 25,000 SF OVER 50,000 SF, TO INSTEAD ALLOW FOR A TOTAL OF 5 LOADING SPACES. 5.4.DEVIATION #23 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5.05.05.B.1, WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM 500 FT SEPARATION BETWEEN FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A MAXIMUM 132 FT SEPARATION BETWEEN THE COSTCO PARCEL AND THE 7-ELEVEN PARCEL LOCATED TO THE NORTH, SEPARATED BY RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD, A 4-LANE ARTERIAL. 5.5.DEVIATION #24 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.05.08.D.2.b.i, WHICH REQUIRES A TOTAL OF 45% GLAZING (GLASS) ON THE TOTAL COMBINED PRIMARY FACADES OF THE BUILDING, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A COMBINATION OF GLAZING AND PLANTED TRELLIS FEATURES TO ACCOUNT FOR A TOTAL OF 23% (12% GLAZING & 11% PLANTED TRELLIS). 5.6.DEVIATION #25 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.05.08.D.4, WHICH REQUIRES VARIATIONS IN BUILDING FACADE MASSING GREATER THAN 150 LINEAR FEET TO INCLUDE A BREAK IN THE FACADE MASSING, TO INSTEAD ALLOW STRUCTURALLY ATTACHED PLANTED TRELLIS FEATURES AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO PROVIDE AN ELEVATION BREAK OUT FOR VISUAL INTEREST ALONG THE BUILDING FACADE LENGTH. 5.7.DEVIATION #26 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.06.04.F.4, WHICH REQUIRES A MAXIMUM SIGNAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN NONRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS OF 750 SF, TO INSTEAD ALLOW FOR AN INCREASE OF 367 SF OVER THE MAXIMUM FOR A TOTAL OF 1,117 SF. 6.BOUNDARY SURVEY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS TAKEN FROM A PLAN ENTITLED “ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR COSTCO WHOLESALE”, DATED JANUARY 3, 2024, PREPARED BY COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN. 7.THE HORIZONTAL DATUM IS RELATIVE TO THE FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD1983 EAST (2011 ADJUSTMENT). THE VERTICAL DATUM IS RELATIVE TO NAVD 1988. 8.BENCHMARK REFERENCE: NGS BENCHMARK STAMP Y 526, ELEVATION: 11.42' (NAVD 1988). 9.THE LIMITS OF FRESHWATER WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED “ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR COSTCO WHOLESALE”, DATED JANUARY 3, 2024, PREPARED BY COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN AND IS PRELIMINARY AND WAITING FOR FINAL APPROVAL. 10.THE FLOOD ZONES DEPICTED HERON ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED “ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR COSTCO WHOLESALE”, DATED JANUARY 3, 2024, PREPARED BY COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN WHICH WAS PLOTTED BASED ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 12021C0606J, LAST REVISED FEBRUARY 8, 2024. 11.GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION AND SOIL TEST PIT LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE AS PRESENTED IN A REPORT ENTITLED “COSTCO WHOLESALE WAREHOUSE: NAPLES, FL - CW23-1027 - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT”, DATED MARCH 27, 2024, PREPARED BY TERRACON. 12.THIS SET OF PLANS IS NOT DEPICTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS OR A CERTIFICATION/WARRANTY REGARDING THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY IMPACTED SITE CONDITIONS. 13.THIS IS A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ELSEWHERE HEREON, IS NOT A SURVEY. 14.DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS AS THEY PERTAIN TO ADJACENT AND SURROUNDING PHYSICAL CONDITIONS, BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, ETC. THEY ARE SCHEMATIC ONLY, EXCEPT WHERE DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN THERETO. 15.THIS SET OF PLANS HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSES OF MUNICIPAL AND AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL. THIS SET OF PLANS SHALL NOT BE UTILIZED AS CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS UNTIL ALL APPROVALS REQUIRED HAVE BEEN OBTAINED, ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL HAVE BEEN SATISFIED AND THE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN STAMPED “ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION”. THIS SHALL INCLUDE APPROVAL OF ALL CATALOG CUTS, SHOP DRAWINGS AND/OR DESIGN CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT OWNER AND/OR MUNICIPAL ENGINEER. 16.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROJECT SAFETY, INCLUDING PROVISION OF ALL APPROPRIATE SAFETY DEVICES AND TRAINING REQUIRED. 17.PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL 811 TO REQUEST A UTILITY MARKOUT. 18.THE COSTCO WAREHOUSE BUILDING WILL BE OF TYPE V-B CONSTRUCTION AND THE COSTCO FUEL FACILITY WILL BE OF TYPE II-B CONSTRUCTION. SITE NOTES 1.BUILDING FOOTPRINT DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE. FINAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT DIMENSIONS FOR EACH BUILDING SHALL BE FURNISHED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS WHEN APPLYING FOR A BUILDING PERMIT. ALL STRUCTURES SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROVED BULK ZONING REQUIREMENTS. 2.CURB RAMPS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED FLUSH WITH THE FINISHED PAVEMENT SURFACE. ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPS INSTALLED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY ARE TO HAVE DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES COMPLIANT WITH FEDERAL ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC ROW. 3.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE/STRIPING SHALL CORRESPOND TO THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. 4.REFUSE AND RECYCLABLES SHALL BE STORED WITHIN OUTSIDE SCREENED COMPACTORS AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND PICKED UP BY PRIVATE WASTE DISPOSAL HAULER. 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPER DISPOSAL OF ALL WASTE MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING REGULATIONS AND AGENCIES. 6.THERE SHALL BE NO ON-SITE BURIAL OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, TREE BRANCHES, STUMPS, OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS. 7.MATERIALS, WORKMANSHIP, AND CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH: A.THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, LATEST VERSION. B.FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION," LATEST VERSION. C.CURRENT PREVAILING MUNICIPAL, COUNTY, AND/OR STATE AGENCY SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, CONDITIONS, AND REQUIREMENTS. D.CURRENT PREVAILING UTILITY COMPANY/AUTHORITY SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, AND REQUIREMENTS. E.CURRENT MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, AND REQUIREMENTS. REQUIRED EXISTING COSTCO FUTURE OUTPARCEL MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 SF ±1,125,715 SF ±25.84 ACRES 949,044 SF 21.79 ACRES 176,677 SF 4.06 ACRES MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FT 1,235 FT 1,114 FT 253 FT PRINCIPAL BUILDING MINIMUM YARD (FROM LOT BOUNDARY)25 FT N/A 52.5 FT T.B.D. MINIMUM YARD (FROM MPUD BOUNDARY)25 FT N/A 61 FT T.B.D. MAXIMUM ZONED BUILDING HEIGHT 50 FT N/A 34 FT T.B.D. MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 60 FT N/A 34 FT T.B.D. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 600 SF N/A 162,671 SF T.B.D. MINIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT 600 SF N/A 162,671 SF T.B.D. ACCESSORY BUILDING MINIMUM YARD (FROM LOT BOUNDARY)10 FT N/A 111.9 FT T.B.D. MINIMUM YARD (FROM MPUD BOUNDARY)10 FT N/A 204 FT T.B.D. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 10 FT N/A N/A T.B.D. MAXIMUM ZONED BUILDING HEIGHT 25 FT N/A 8.92 FT T.B.D. MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 30 FT N/A 8.92 FT T.B.D. MINIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT 80 SF N/A 197 SF T.B.D. MAXIMUM BUILDING (LOT) COVERAGE N/A 0.00%17.2%25.5% * MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE N/A 1.48%71.4%51.0% * BUFFER 10 FT 10.98 FT 11 FT T.B.D. PARKING USE: 1 SPACE/250 SF RETAIL/OFFICE AREAS 652 SPACES 0 SPACES 819 SPACES T.B.D. LOADING PER TABLE 18 IN COLLIER COUNTY LD CODE SECTION 4.05.06.B 8 SPACES 0 SPACES 5 SPACES (V)T.B.D. ADA SPACES 2% TOTAL 0 SPACES 17 SPACES T.B.D. BUILDING AREA N/A 107 SF 162,868 SF 45,061 SF* NON-BUILDING IMPERVIOUS AREA N/A 16,541 SF 514,612 SF 45,028 SF* LAKE/WETLAND AREA N/A 848,716 SF 18,515 SF 3,265 SF* GREEN AREA N/A 260,352 SF 253,049 SF 83,323 SF* GENERAL NOTES 09/01/22MCNJ-CVER-NOTE-1000 MOD: 09/10/24 5.THE FOLLOWING DEVIATIONS (PER AMENDED EXHIBIT E LIST OF DEVIATIONS TO ORD. 22-18) ARE BEING REQUESTED AS A PART OF AUTO SERVICE STATION WAIVER (ASW) PL20240011790 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE (PDI) PL20240011559: 5.1.DEVIATION #20 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.02.08, WHICH REQUIRES A MAXIMUM LIGHT POLE HEIGHT OF 25 FT, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A NEW MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36.5 FT. 5.2.DEVIATION #21 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.05.04.C, WHICH REQUIRES COMMERCIAL PROJECTS WITH A MINIMUM 80 PARKING SPACES AND OFF-STREET PARKING IN EXCESS OF 120% TO OBTAIN A VARIANCE AND PROVIDE DOUBLE THE LANDSCAPING REQUIRED IN INTERIOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS, TO INSTEAD NOT REQUIRE A VARIANCE AND ONLY PROVIDE THE NORMAL LANDSCAPING REQUIRED IN INTERIOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS AS REQUIRED IN LDC SECTION 4.06.03. 5.3.DEVIATION #22 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.05.06.B, WHICH REQUIRES MINIMUM LOADING SPACES OF 3, PLUS 1 FOR EACH 25,000 SF OVER 50,000 SF, TO INSTEAD ALLOW FOR A TOTAL OF 5 LOADING SPACES. 5.4.DEVIATION #23 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5.05.05.B.1, WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM 500 FT SEPARATION BETWEEN FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A MAXIMUM 132 FT SEPARATION BETWEEN THE COSTCO PARCEL AND THE 7-ELEVEN PARCEL LOCATED TO THE NORTH, SEPARATED BY RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD, A 4-LANE ARTERIAL. 5.5.DEVIATION #24 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.05.08.D.2.b.i, WHICH REQUIRES A TOTAL OF 45% GLAZING ('GLASS') ON THE TOTAL COMBINED PRIMARY FACADES OF THE BUILDING, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A COMBINATION OF GLAZING AND PLANTED TRELLIS FEATURES TO ACCOUNT FOR A TOTAL OF 23% (12% GLAZING & 11% PLANTED TRELLIS). 5.6.DEVIATION #25 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.05.08.D.4, WHICH REQUIRES VARIATIONS IN BUILDING FACADE MASSING GREATER THAN 150 LINEAR FEET TO INCLUDE A BREAK IN THE FACADE MASSING, TO INSTEAD ALLOW STRUCTURALLY ATTACHED PLANTED TRELLIS FEATURES AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO PROVIDE AN ELEVATION BREAK OUT FOR VISUAL INTEREST ALONG THE BUILDING FACADE LENGTH. 5.7.DEVIATION #26 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.06.04.F.4, WHICH REQUIRES A MAXIMUM SIGNAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN NONRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS OF 750 SF, TO INSTEAD ALLOW FOR AN INCREASE OF 367 SF OVER THE MAXIMUM FOR A TOTAL OF 1,117 SF. BUFFER PER LDC BUFFER PER LDC BUFFER PER LDC BUFFER PER LDC (PENDING FPL APPROVAL) BUFFER PER LDC 170' WIDE FPL EASEMENT OVERFLOW FPL EASEMENT PARKING 149 STALLS 103% OF CODE REQUIRED PARKING 670 STALLS PARKING EXHIBITREVISED PARKING EXHIBIT BASED ON CURRENT DIMENSION PLAN405/12/25SVDPage 600 of 6526 APRIL 2024 | CW23-0567 | ALLEN, TEXAS 331'-0"331'-0"334'-0" WAREHOUSE SIGNAGE ELEVATIONS PL20240011559 NORTH ELEVATION (NTS)1 EAST ELEVATION - NO SIGN (NTS)2 SOUTH ELEVATION - HOSPITAL (NTS) 4 WEST ELEVATION (NTS)5 NE ENTRY ELEVATION (NTS)3 SIGN PACKAGE6 - A -- B -- C - 329'-6"331'-0"334'-0" SEE VIEW 3 332'-6"332'-6" 331'-0"334'-0"331'-0" 334'-0" 32'-0" 6'-0"5'-0" 26'-8"17'-4" 1'-9" SMOOTH FACE CMU "GRAY" STRIPE "COSTCO RED" KINGSPAN INSULATED METAL PANEL "METALLIC CHAMPAGNE" COPING "MEDIUM DARK BRONZE"316'-0" SMOOTH FACE CMU "GRAY"COPING "MEDIUM DARK BRONZE" SMOOTH FACE CMU "BUFF" STRIPE "COSTCO RED"VERTICAL RIBBED PANEL "SANDSTONE" KINGSPAN INSULATED METAL PANEL "SURREY BEIGE" COPING "MEDIUM DARK BRONZE" COPING "MEDIUM DARK BRONZE" VERTICAL RIBBED PANEL "SURREY BEIGE" SCREEN METAL TRELLIS "PLANTED" ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING SPANDREL GLAZING COPING "MEDIUM DARK BRONZE" VERTICAL RIBBED PANEL "SURREY BEIGE" A A BCB A 334'-0"334'-0" SPANDREL GLAZING METAL CHANNEL "MEDIUM DARK BRONZE" KINGSPAN INSULATED METAL PANEL "SANDSTONE" SCREEN METAL TRELLIS "PLANTED" SCREEN METAL TRELLIS "PLANTED" ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING METAL CHANNEL "MEDIUM DARK BRONZE" VERTICAL RIBBED PANEL "SURREY BEIGE" 334'-0"330'-0"331'-0" VERTICAL RIBBED PANEL "SURREY BEIGE" 330'-0" 330'-0"331'-0"334'-0"331'-0" JANUARY 2025 COLLIER COUNTY, FL (SOUTH NAPLES) 18'-0"1'-9" LIQUOR SALES - D - RONZE" GREEN SIGNS DETERMINES SIZES PER CODE TOTAL 250 SF / CODE 250 SF / CODE 250 SF / CODE PART OF THE 250 SF @ NORTH ELEVATION2 3 24 22 A-286 sf (36 sf over) C-31 sf (31 sf over) Requires variance for 31 sf of sign-age B-198 sf (angled to rattlesnake) Elevation 1 & 3 combined exceed allowable display area by 36 sf +30 sf + 198 sf. Requires waiver for 264 sf of signage.25 21 A-286 sf (36 sf over) A B C D QTY 4 1 1 1 SIGNAGE AREA TABULATION - WALL SIGNS SIGN COSTCO WHOLESALE COSTCO WHOLESALE TIRE CENTER LIQUOR SALES SIZE 6'-0" "C" 5'-2" "C" 17'-4" X 1'-9" 18'-0" X 1'-9" AREA (SF) EA 286 SF 198 SF 31 SF 30 SF TOTAL SF 1,144 198 31 30 1,403TOTAL SIGNAGE AREA 286 SF 198 SF 31 SF 30 SF SPANDREL GLAZING SMOOTH FACE CMU "SAHARA BROWN" TYPE TRELLIS TYPE TRELLIS B B A A BB A A B B A B B TRELLIS CONNECTION TO THE BUILDING TRELLIS OVERHEAD TRELLIS CONNECTION TO THE BUILDING PERMITTED SEPARATELY FROM THE MAIN BUILDING 30 SF DIRECTIONAL / WAY-FINDING SIGNAGE 31 SF DIRECTIONAL /WAY-FINDING SIGNANGE Page 601 of 6526 1 IN ATTENDANCE • John Alvarado & Jim Ostrowski- Costco Wholesale representatives • Brad Wester – Driver McAfee Hawthorne & Diebenow (Agent) • David Torres – Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC (subject property owner) • Chris Riggle, PE - Colliers Engineering & Design (Civil Engineering) • Ryan Cunningham, PE – Kittleson & Associates (Traffic Engineering) • Juan Zapata – Ware Malcomb (Architectural) • Collier County planning department staff members • Laura Layden (attended virtually on the Microsoft ‘Teams’ video/audio link) • General public, news media, local residents & other community participants • Security personnel and owners of the Swamp Buggy Race/Rec Park facility MEETING MINUTES* Introduction by Brad Wester setting the tone as a recorded public meeting workshop (not a public hearing, but a Neighborhood Information Meeting) as part of the requirement to the group in attendance. Explanation of format of the meeting and timeframe. Identify the six graphic display boards showing project maps and details in the room. Frank Cipolla, the local opposition organizer spoke and thanked the crowd for the turnout and generally echoed what Brad said. Explanation that the facility is for a new Costco Wholesale store with gas on a site that is already commercially zoned for the use. The reason for NIM meeting is explain and present: 1. slight waivers/modifications to PUD Hacienda Lakes Development 2. gas facility within 500 feet of another gas facility (7-eleven) – requires waiver and public notice. This one is a member-only gas facility for Costco, unlike the 7-eleven. COSTCO WHOLESALE NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Date: February 18th, 2025 Time: 6:00 PM – 7:00 PM Meeting called to order by: Brad Wester, DMH&D Page 602 of 6526 2 QUESTIONS & ANSWERS Community member question (Q)– if you do not get the variance for gas use, will it kill the project? Team Answer (A) – right now it’s early in the process, going though comments Q – 135/140 feet from 7-eleven how will you get that waiver granted? A – Local law requires a 500ft separation, but the process allows the application/request to the county to review of all elements for a waiver. The difference is that this is a member-based service. Q - # of people/patrons getting fuel? Staffing A – that has been programmed into the design for maximum efficiency regarding cars using the facility – traffic and civil engineer in attendance to answer if needed. Q – how many lanes will it be? A – 12 fuel pumps double sided, to avoid line issues and maximize flow of vehicles. Q – where will queuing cars go? A – designed to hold 70 vehicles on site in the queuing lanes. Q – concern RE environmental impact of fueling/ gas facility, doesn’t matter how many cars there are. A – we are adhering to all the federal and local requirements. Q – concern of single entrance and exit and concerns of accidents A – there will be multiple access points to the main roadways. Q – seems like too much in one place A – it’s a commercially zoned site for this type of use already, inherently it comes with need for multiple access points, currently we have 3 – pointed to on physical maps. Q – elementary school nearby? A – cannot comment because not family with the specifics of the school– but it is a factor to the accepted traffic methodology current in review by the county. Q – why Costco has to go here? Is your reward predicted on Costco building in the Hacienda development? It seems ludicrous to take a facility like that with a service station and large building into this small property with 3,000 apartments being built with larger homes, there is larger property on Rt 41 South on way to Goodland where there is public complex. Recommended 2nd site on Collier Blvd as perfect place. Your 3rd entrance has been denied so there are only 2, the hospital should be against this for emergency vehicle access. A - this site is already commercially zoned, that’s one factor, Costco puts a lot of resources into research of the best locations for growth to provide best services and access to members. This is an ideal location for Costco Q – gas facility in proximity to another gas facility Page 603 of 6526 3 A – this gas facility comes with the Costco store, its not abutting the other gas facility, its across the street and it is member based and not public open. Q – when was the last traffic impact study done regarding this and will there be another study be done? How will you address the amount of traffic that is coming? A – last traffic study was submitted in January. is currently in review and going back and forth with county comments. This site is already zoned commercial, its already programmed for a retail store like this. Q – how many people go through Costco in a day? A – traffic wise we anticipate 4500. Q – if you don’t get the waiver? A – its too early to say regarding the waiver, it still has to go through the full process Q – have you taken into account that there are 2 story apartments, nursing homes, etc. in the driving study? A – yes Q – Will there be another community meeting related to the waiver? A – going through the waiver process now, comments and responses, requesting this use specifically, there will be public hearings and there will be more information and detail on landscape, traffic, lighting, etc presented as part of the application details and hearing stage. Q – is there a way to get the gas station without the waiver? A – only if over 500 ft away per code. Q – is there a way to get that distance? A – may be a way to flip the plans, orientation and wayfinding is key to the site for Costco for the consumer, they’re going through the best plan possible now with the current orientation. Q – 500ft regulation is that for a safety concern? A – don’t have an answer but will find out Q – if you can get a waiver on safety. A – safety is # 1 for Costco too. Q – amount of traffic and trips on roadway A – traffic study is in the county’s hands and is public record, going back and forth on comments and responses Q – who do we go to for due process to provide their comments? A – staff, local elected officials and boards. Q – traffic concern, is a county comment – events in area create traffic that blocks the residents, and the road needs to be widened with a light there, she doesn’t have a problem with Costco but big concern for traffic Page 604 of 6526 4 A – going through the process now with county staff for facility Q – traffic – how come study is at specific seasonal time? A – we have a methodology for studies, they followed that process. Q – traffic study – a lot of the new growth was not built yet A – factors of traffic study account for all uses, which started last May (2024) and submitted in Jan (2025). Q – traffic – appreciate studies done but don’t believe it to be accurate since the growth A – traffic methodology is agreed upon from the state level, not by us and going through comments and responses Q – about square footage A – it’s already approved in the PUD, as well as the access points, we are not increasing what is already allowed as square footage, or the use, its already defined as a specific commercial activity center, turn lanes and deceleration lanes are also included Q – 1 – are you looking for any other locations in SE Naples? Q – wouldn’t it be better south of that on E 41? Q – 2 – never seen stand alone Costco, usually in midst of other residential community like this. A – this is the site we are here to talk about tonight Q – why does Costco want to build there? A – Costco has a lot of resources in selecting a site, density, permissibility, and many other factors, this was an optimal site based on emerging growth and existing Costco in the area. They assess many factors. The biggest element is that it is already zoned for commercial use activity. Q – what is the effect of Costco for property values? A – don’t have an answer to property valuation that based on commercial use going into commercial property Q – about the study of environmental aspects, has Costco studied that? A – yes not only in the beginning, but Costco is always in compliance with all regulations federal, and state, unlike other facilities – its tied to operation of store so gas facility closes when the store closes. Q – gas facility on map A – infrastructure looks bigger but its built on whats there. Idk what hes saying less pumps for gas, not typical gas station, latest technology Q – construction vehicles entering and exiting site? A – dedicated loading facility and loading vehicles with products at night not during operating hours, they have it down to a science, its not in street, showed on map, regarding construction. Q – descriptions on delivery times? Page 605 of 6526 5 A – only at night, during closed hours, not operating hours, you won’t see it from residential areas. Regarding construction – there is an element to the construction plan for maintenance of MOT – maintenance of traffic. I don’t have an answer of where it is but there is a specific plan. Q – children, grandchildren – how would you like 4500 cars daily – did you study the height of the traffic and emissions? A – study of cars emissions are not part of the study, different regulations for Naples than California. ANNOUNCEMENT TO WRAP UP MEETING DUE TO TIME EXPIRATION IN RESERVED ROOM *Meeting minutes are generalized and paraphrased. An audio recording of this meeting is also provided. Page 606 of 6526 Page 607 of 6526 Page | 1 The public is invited to attend a Neighborhood Information Meeting to discuss the proposed Costco Wholesale store and gas facility on: February 18, 2025, beginning at 6:00pm, at The Florida Sports Park Reception Hall, located at 8520 Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Naples, FL 34114, (the location of the World Famous Swamp Buggy Races). Formal applications have been submitted to Collier County seeking approval for the following: Insubstantial Change to Planned Unit Development (PDI- PL#20240011559) and Auto Service Station Waiver (ASW- PL#20240011790). The request is for a PDI (PL#20240011559) for relief from certain standards and an ASW (PL#20240011790) for a gas distance separation waiver for the development of a new Costco Wholesale store and gas facility located generally at the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Drive and Collier Boulevard on approximately 25-acres (County Parcel ID# 48586002021) in the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). Project Location Map On-line participation in the meeting will be made available by request. If you have questions related to the project or would like to participate virtually, please contact the agent for the Costco Wholesale matters listed below. Bradley C. Wester Driver McAfee Hawthorne & Diebenow, PLLC. One Independent Drive, Suite 1200 Jacksonville, Florida 32202 904-301-1269 bcw@drivermcafee.com Page 608 of 6526 Page 609 of 6526 Page 610 of 6526 Page 611 of 6526 Page 612 of 6526 Page 613 of 6526 Page 614 of 6526 Page 615 of 6526 Page 616 of 6526 Page 617 of 6526 Page 618 of 6526 Page 619 of 6526 Page 620 of 6526 Page 621 of 6526 Page 622 of 6526 GIS PROCESSING REQUEST (Property Notification Address Listing) Lists do not include Civic or Homeowner Associations. Submit completed form to DL-GMDNorthGIS@colliercountyfl.gov Please allow 3-5 business days for your request to be completed. NOTE: Incomplete or altered forms will not be accepted. Request Date: NIM Date (if scheduled): Name of Agent/Applicant: Business: Telephone #: E-Mail: PL Number (required): Folio Number(s) of Property: and/or PUD Name (required) Buffer Distance Around Site Location (select one): [ ] 150 ft [ ] 500 ft [ ] 1,000 ft [ ] 1 Mile Properties Included (select all applicable): [ ] Internal [ ] External [ ] Names, Addresses, and Property Descriptions Results: [ ] Names and Addresses Only Product(s) and Processing Fees [ ] Spreadsheet (MS Excel, Electronic) [ ] Mailing Labels (Printed) [ ] Spreadsheet and Mailing Labels $70.00 $80.00 + $0.06 for every record over 1,500 $85.00 + $0.11 for every record over 1,500 Disclaimer: The data used in this request belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided. As such, Collier County and its employees make no guarantees, implied or otherwise as to the accuracy or completeness. Collier County therefore do not accept any responsibilities as to its use. AGENT/APPLICANT INFORMATION SITE LOCATION INFORMATION REQUESTED PRODUCTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Page 623 of 6526 8360 SIERRA MEADOWS MOB LLC 841 PRUDENTIAL DR #200 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207---0 CCMR RESPONSIVE LLC RLC RESPONSIVE LLC RLC RESPONSIVE PARTNERS LLC ATTN: BARRY J HASKELL 9777 VITRAIL LN DELRAY BEACH, FL 33446---0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 COLLIER HMA INC % ALTUS GROUP PO BOX 92129 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092---0 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC 7742 ALICO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC 7742 ALICO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC 7742 ALICO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC 7742 ALICO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 HAMMOCK PARK DEVELOPMENT LLC 7742 ALICO ROAD FT MYERS, FL 33912---0 HAMMOCK PARK RESIDENTIAL LLC 7742 ALICO ROAD FT MYERS, FL 33912---0 HAMMOCK WOODS LLC 12580 UNIVERSITY DR STE 102 FORT MYERS, FL 33907---5686 HAMMOCK WOODS LLC 42 BARKLEY CIR STE 3 FORT MYERS, FL 33907---4543 MHP FL VII LLLP 601 BRICKELL KEY DR # 700 MIAMI, FL 33131---0 MHP FL VII LLLP 601 BRICKELL KEY DR #700 MIAMI, FL 3313---0 PX REALTY LLC 5355 TOWN CENTER RD #430 BOCA RATON, FL 33486---0 RACETRAC INC ATTN PROPERTY TAX DEPT 200 GALLERIA PARKWAY SE STE 900 ATLANTA, GA 30339---0 RACETRAC INC ATTN PROPERTY TAX DEPT 200 GALLERIA PARKWAY SE STE 900 ATLANTA, GA 30339---0 S-H NAPLES DEVELOPMENT PROPCO LLC % DISCOVERY MANAGEMENT GROUP 27599 RIVERVIEW CENTER BLVD STE 201 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 SIERRA MEADOWS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN INC 24600 S TAMIAMI TRL # 212 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 SIERRA MEADOWS PROPERTY INC 12580 UNIVERSITY DR STE 102 FORT MYERS, FL 33907---5686 SIERRA MEADOWS PROPERTY INC 12580 UNIVERSITY DR STE 102 FORT MYERS, FL 33907---5686 TCW 2082 LLC 2082 TRADE CENTER WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---0 TRACT L DEVELOPMENT LLC 7742 ALICO ROAD FORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 Page 624 of 6526 Costco Wholesale Deviation & Justification List June 11, 2025 Deviations Descriptions & Justifications 1. A deviation from LDC Section 4.02.08 for relief from the maximum light pole height of 25 feet to a new maximum height of 36.5 feet. Justification: The 25 foot height standard will add up to 13 more poles to the overall site. The requested 36.5 foot height allows for a reduced amount of poles overall reducing visual clutter and will still adhere to the photometric standard at the property edge. 2. A deviation from LDC Section 4.05.04.C for relief from the additional requirement to obtain a variance and provide double the interior landscaping if the commercial project includes more than 120% of the required parking. The relief will not require a variance and allow the normal landscape requirements to apply to this commercial project. Justification: Per the enclosed parking exhibit, 149 spaces are depicted as overflow and provided in an existing FPL utility easement. 670 spaces are proposed outside the FPL easement on the main development area and is approximately 103% of the parking standard maximum, which is below the 120% threshold on-site. 3. A deviation from LDC Section 4.05.06.B for relief from the minimum loading spaces required (3 plus 1 for each 25,000 square feet over 50,000 square feet) for a total amount of 5 loading spaces, which is the standard for this type of Costco Wholesale store. Justification: The requested 5 loading spaces are the required amount for Costco Wholesale (4 at the store building and 1 at the gas facility). The required Code amount is excessive and not warranted for this Costco Wholesale use as customarily used. Current Costco standard is 4 loading spaces attached to the building and 1 at the fuel facility. This number of spaces is standard for Costco operations. There is no need for additional loading spaces. 4. A deviation from LDC Section 05.05.08.D.2.b.i for relief from the façade requirement for 15% of glazing (‘glass’) on primary facades for a reduction from the total 45% for all facades to a total of 23% (12% glazing and 11% planted trellis) per the architectural exhibit and descriptive chart included with this request. Justification: The building will incorporate planted metal trellises structurally attached to the building façade as an alternative to glazing in certain areas. This approach aims to mitigate the absence of glazing as much as possible, in alignment with the project program, while also contributing to the architectural aesthetics and functionality. Please see below calculations per elevation, totals provided by type and location, and overall totals compared to the overall provided. Page 625 of 6526 Costco Wholesale Deviation & Justification List June 11, 2025 5. A deviation from LDC Section 05.05.08.D.4 for relief from the required variations in building facades greater than 150 feet in length for a break in massing. Justification: For the variation on the massing, the structurally attached planted trellis is providing an elevation break out for visual interest variations along the façade length. They are also strategically placed to work with the project’s program while contributing to the architectural aesthetics and meeting the spirit and intent of the requirement. 6. A deviation from LDC Section 05.06.04.F.4 for relief from the maximum signage square footage requirement in nonresidential districts for a proposed total of 367 square feet over the maximum combined of 750 square feet. The proposed signage total is 1,117 square feet. Elevations 1 & 3 are the North facing elevations and are 264 square feet over the maximum required amount for the ‘Costco Wholesale’ signage and ‘Liquor Sales’ directional/way-finding signage combined. Elevation 2 is the East facing elevation and it's not permitted to have a ‘Costco Wholesale’ advertisement wall sign so it does not include one, but it will include a small non-illuminated 31 square foot directional/way-finding ‘Tire Center’ sign over the tire center entrance. Elevation 4 is the South elevation and is 36 square feet over the required amount for the ‘Costco Wholesale’ signage. Likewise, elevation 5 is the West elevation and is 36 square feet over the required amount for the ‘Costco Wholesale’ signage. Justification: The signage exhibit enclosed provides the required and relief request for a total of 367 square feet over the standard respectively, for the combined amount. This signage square footage increase is commensurate with the size of the building face for increased visibility for promotion, orientation and way-finding. Additionally, no other signage, including pole signs, ground signs, projecting signs and or other per LDC Section 5.06.04 is proposed for this site except for the requested signage on the face of the building. Page 626 of 6526 BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FIELD BOOK:PAGE: 01 XXXX UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO A SURVEY OR ENGINEERING MAP BEARING A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209, SUB-DIVISION 2, OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW.ONLY MAPS WITH THE LAND SURVEYOR OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S SEAL ARE GENUINE TRUE AND CORRECT COPIES OF THE LAND SURVEYOR OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER’S ORIGINAL WORK AND OPINION.REVDATEDRAWN BYDESCRIPTIONSHEET NUMBER: SCALE: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY:DATE: DRAWING NAME: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE: PROTECT YOURSELF Copyright © 2024. Colliers Engineering & Design All Rights Reserved. This drawing and all the information contained herein is authorized for use only by the party for whom the services were contracted or to whom it is certified. This drawing may not be copied, reused, disclosed, distributed or relied upon for any other purpose without the express written consent of Colliers Engineering & Design. ALL STATES REQUIRE NOTIFICATION OF EXCAVATORS, DESIGNERS, OR ANY PERSON PREPARING TO DISTURB THE EARTH'S SURFACE ANYWHERE IN ANY STATE FOR STATE SPECIFIC DIRECT PHONE NUMBERS VISIT: WWW.CALL811.COM V-SURV 2021\21007015A\Survey\Plans\V-SURV.dwg\SURVEY NOTES PG 1 By: DFERRAROR REVIEWED BY: NOTE: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION. CITY OF PITTSBURGHDEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNINGAPPROVED: _______________________ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION _______________________ CHAIRMANATTEST: _______________________ _______________________SECRETARY Phone: Engineering & Design www.colliersengineering.com C O N S U L T I N G Engineering & Design ENGINEERS + SURVEYING ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY TRACT G PLAT BOOK 55, PAGES 10 THROUGH 21 SEC. 23, TWS 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST CITY OF NAPLES COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA AS SHOWN 01/03/2024 KE 21007015A 02........................................__________________________ of FOR PTH TAMPA 7284 West Palmetto Park Rd Suite 201-S Boca Raton, FL 33433 561.717.6496 COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS MASER CONSULTING Doing Business as I N F O R M A T I O N O F F A C T 1.THIS SURVEY AND PLAN IS BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING DATA AND/OR EXCEPTIONS: CERTIFIED TO : COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. 2.AREAS: TRACT G = 1,125,715.44 SQ. FT.± / 25.84 ACRES±. 3.THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THIS MAP OR PLAN IS THE RESULT OF A FIELD SURVEY PERFORMED ON 12/19/23, BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS PROMULGATED BY THE "FLORIDA BOARD OF SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS." THE INFORMATION DEPICTED HEREON, CORRECTLY REPRESENTS THE CONDITIONS FOUND AT, AND AS OF THE DATE OF THE FIELD SURVEY, EXCEPT SUCH IMPROVEMENTS OR EASEMENTS, IF ANY BELOW THE SURFACE AND NOT VISIBLE. ACCORDINGLY THE UNDERSIGNED PROFESSIONAL IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PRESENCE OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, IF SAME ARE NOT VISIBLE OR OTHERWISE DISCLOSED BY ANY AFOREMENTIONED DATA LISTED ABOVE. 4.THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2016 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 11, 13, 14, OF TABLE A THEREOF, THE FIELDWORK WAS COMPLETED ON DECEMBER 19, 2023. 5.THE USE OF THE WORD "CERTIFY" OR "CERTIFICATION" CONSTITUTES AN EXPRESSION OF PROFESSIONAL OPINION REGARDING THOSE FACTS OR FINDINGS WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE UNDERSIGNED PROFESSIONAL'S KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION, AND BELIEF, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMMONLY ACCEPTED PROCEDURE CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE, AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. 6.THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE BASED ON VISIBLE ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES. NO EXCAVATIONS WERE MADE DURING THE PROGRESS OF THIS SURVEY TO LOCATE BURIED UTILITIES/STRUCTURES, ADDITIONAL BURIED UTILITIES/STRUCTURES MAY BE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES FIELD VERIFIED BY THE PROPER UTILITY COMPANIES BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. 7.HORIZONTAL DATUM = FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (FL S.P.C.S.) NAD 1983 EAST(2011 ADJUSTMENT) WAS ESTABLISHED AT THE PROJECT SITE BASED ON REAL TIME KINEMATIC (RTK) GPS OBSERVATIONS. 8.VERTICAL DATUM = NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88) WAS ESTABLISHED AT THE PROJECT SITE BASED ON A NGS BENCHMARK STAMP Y 526 WITH AN ELEVATION OF 11.42' (NAVD88). 9.THE UNDERSIGNED PROFESSIONAL IS NOT QUALIFIED TO DETERMINE THE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF WETLANDS AND/OR TOXIC WASTES. THEREFORE IT SHOULD NOT BE ASSUMED OR CONSTRUED THAT ANY STATEMENT IS BEING MADE BY THE FACT THAT NO EVIDENCE OF WETLANDS OR TOXIC WASTES IS PORTRAYED HEREON. IT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CLIENT TO PURSUE THESE MATTERS AS SEPARATE CONCERNS APART FROM THIS SURVEY. 10.THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY THE SURVEYOR. ALL INFORMATION REGARDING RECORD EASEMENTS, ADJOINERS, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS THAT MIGHT AFFECT THE QUALITY OF TITLE TO TRACT SHOWN HEREON WAS GAINED FROM A TITLE REPORT LISTED IN NOTE 1E ABOVE. 11.THE PARCEL SHOWN HEREON LIES IN FLOOD ZONE "A, AE & X" PER THE FLOOD RATE MAP FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA MAP NUMBER 12021C0606J, WITH A REVISION DATE OF FEBRUARY 8, 2024 AS ESTABLISHED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA). ALL FLOOD ZONE LINES SHOWN HEREON WERE DIGITIZED FROM FLOOD ZONE MAP. COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN MAKES NO GUARANTIES OR WARRANTIES ON LOCATION ACCURACY. 12.THIS PLAN IS MADE FOR AND CERTIFIED TO THE PARTIES NAMED HEREON FOR THE PURPOSE(S) STATED. NO OTHER PURPOSE IS INTENDED NOR IMPLIED. THE UNDERSIGNED PROFESSIONAL IS NEITHER RESPONSIBLE NOR LIABLE FOR THE USE OF THIS PLAN BEYOND ITS INTENDED PURPOSE. 14.BASIS OF BEARING: THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD. ALSO BEING THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF TRACT G HAVING A BEARING OF : N00°51'39" E (RTK) 15.WETLAND LINE SHOWN HEREON WERE PREPARED BY COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN ON DECEMBER 8, 2023. WETLAND LINE ARE PRELIMINARY AND WAITING FOR FINAL APPROVAL. 16.SUBJECT PROPERTY ACCESS RIGHT OF WAY: "RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD/CR 864" 17.THE PROPERTY HEREON DESCRIBED IS THE SAME AS THE PERTINENT PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY'S, COMMITMENT NO. NCS-119939-ATL, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF NOVEMBER 6, 2023. C.) FIELD SURVEY B.) DEED OF RECORD E.) TITLE REPORT D.) PLAT F.) OTHER (SEE REFERENCES) A.) OWNER YES NO FIELD LOCATED ON 12/19/2023 ITEM X PLAT BOOK 55, PAGES 10 THROUGH 21, "HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES" FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENTS NUMBER: NCS-1199393-ATL EFFECTIVE DATE: MAY 20, 2024 AT 7:30 AM X X X X X MAP OF SURVEY ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ATION THEREOF TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, SUBJECT TO NOTES STATUES, AND THAT THE SKETCH HEREON IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE REPRESENT- 5J-17, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS CHAPTER THIS CERTIFIES THAT THE SURVEY REPRESENTED HEREON WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE SET OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER FIELD SURVEY: 02/14/2024 DATE OF AND NOTATIONS SHOWN HEREON. S U R V E Y O R ' S C E R T I F I C A T E NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL CHARLES D. FERRARO - REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR FLORIDA CERTIFICATION NO. 4768 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC. FO CABX FL HY DN S EW NORTHDETAIL 18" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP - INDICATES REBAR W/ CAP FOUND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED - INDICATES CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND L E G E N D - INDICATES REBAR W/ CAP OR MAG NAIL SET, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) - INDICATES MAG NAIL & DISK FOUND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION COMMITMENT PREPARED BY "FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY", UNDER COMMITMENT NUMBER NCS-1199393-ATL, WITH A COMMITMENT DATE OF MAY 20, 2024 AT 07:30 AM. THE BELOW REFERENCED ITEMS ARE NUMBERED AS THEY APPEAR IN SCHEDULE B SECTION II OF THE TITLE COMMITMENT AS FOLLOWS: SCHEDULE B-II EXCEPTIONS: 10.Matters shown on the Plat of Hacienda Lakes of Naples, recorded in Plat Book 55, Page 10; as affected by Scrivener's Affidavit recorded in Book 5154, Page 316 of Official Records; as affected by Scrivener's Affidavit recorded in Book 5154, Page 318 of Official Records; as affected by Clerks Reference Sheet recorded in Book 5024, Page 2448 of Official Records.(DOES AFFECT, PLOTTED) 11.The terms, provisions, and conditions contained in that certain Ordinance 75-20, by the board of County commissioners of Collier county, Florida, recorded in Book 619, Page 1177 of Official Records; as affected by Ordinance 75-21, by the board of County commissioners of Collier county, Florida recorded in Book 619, Page 1182 of Official Records. (DOES AFFECT, BLANKET IN NATURE) 12.Easement granted to Florida Power & Light Company by instrument recorded in Book 692, Page 774 of Official Records; as affected by Memorandum of Right-of-Way Consent Agreement recorded in Book 3857, Page 1047 of Official Records. (DOES AFFECT, PLOTTED) 13.Easement granted to Florida Power & Light Company by instrument recorded in Book 870, Page 343 of Official Records; as affected by Memorandum of Right-of-Way Consent Agreement recorded in Book 3857, Page 1047 of Official Records. (DOES AFFECT, PLOTTED) 14.Easement, granted from William Henry Martin and Inez L. Martin, his wife to Peter P. Hawryluk and Ann M. Hawryluk, recorded in Book 882, Page 1867 of Official Records. (DOES NOT AFFECT) 15.Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions as set forth in Warranty Deed recorded on September 10, 1999 as Book 2590, Page 2071, of Official Records, but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction indicating a preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin to the extent such covenants, conditions or restrictions violate 42 USC 3604(c). (DOES NOT AFFECT) 16.Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions as set forth in Warranty Deed recorded on March 18, 2003 as Book 3241, Page 3460, of Official Records, but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction indicating a preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin to the extent such covenants, conditions or restrictions violate 42 USC 3604(c). (DOES NOT AFFECT) 17.Terms and conditions of the Joint Access Easement Agreement between Vision & Faith, Inc., a Florida corporation and Collier HMA, Inc., a Florida corporation recorded in Book 3241, Page 3464 of Official Records; as affected by Amendment to Joint Access Easement Agreement recorded in Book 4045, Page 2151 of Official Records. (DOES AFFECT, BLANKET IN NATURE) 18.The terms, provisions, and conditions contained in that certain Environmental Resource Permit Notice by South Florida Water Management District, recorded in Book 3845, Page 2681 of Official Records. (DOES AFFECT, BLANKET IN NATURE) 19.The terms, provisions, and conditions contained in that certain Order of Taking, recorded in Book 3910, Page 3745 of Official Records; as affected by Stipulated Final Judgment recorded in Book 4631, Page 1163 of Official Records. (DOES AFFECT, PLOTTED) 20.The terms, provisions, and conditions contained in that certain Notice of Environmental Resource or Surface Water Management Permit by the South Florida Water Management District, recorded in Book 4765, Page 504 of Official Records. (DOES AFFECT, PLOTTED) 21.Terms and conditions of the Assignment of Residential Development Rights between Swamp Buggy, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation and Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, a Florida limited liability company recorded in Book 4845, Page 1286 of Official Records. (DOES NOT AFFECT) 22.Terms and conditions of the Assignment of Residential Development Rights between Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation and Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, a Florida limited liability company recorded in Book 4845, Page 1290 of Official Records. (DOES NOT AFFECT) 23.The terms, provisions, and conditions contained in that certain Notice of Department of the Army Permit, recorded in Book 4845, Page 2209 of Official Records. (DOES AFFECT, BLANKET IN NATURE) 24.The terms, provisions, and conditions contained in that certain Notice of Establishment of Hacienda Lakes Community Development District, recorded in Book 4852, Page 1137 of Official Records; as affected by Amended and Restated Notice of Establishment of the Hacienda Lakes Community Development District recorded in Book 5500, Page 3229 of Official Records. (DOES AFFECT, BLANKET IN NATURE) 25.The terms, provisions, and conditions contained in that certain Declaration of Consent to Jurisdiction of Hacienda Lakes Community Development District and to Imposition of Special Assessments, recorded in Book 4928, Page 3894 of Official Records. (DOES AFFECT, BLANKET IN NATURE) 26.Temporary easement granted to Taylor Morrison of Florida Inc., a Florida corporation, according to instrument recorded in Book 4938 page 2470 of Official Records. (DOES NOT AFFECT, PLOTTED) 27.The terms, provisions, and conditions contained in that certain Notice of Adoption of a Development Order, recorded in Book 4968, Page 860 of Official Records. (DOES AFFECT, BLANKET IN NATURE) 28.Easement, granted from Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC to Embarq Florida, Inc., d/b/a CenturyLink, recorded in Book 5009, Page 1293 of Official Records. (DOES AFFECT, PLOTTED) 29.Easement granted to Florida Power & Light Company by instrument recorded in Book 5010, Page 833 of Official Records. (DOES NOT AFFECT, PLOTTED) 30.Easement granted to Florida Power Corporation by instrument recorded in Book 5103, Page 569 of Official Records. (DOES NOT AFFECT) 31.The terms, provisions, and conditions contained in that certain Vacation of Dedicated Easement, recorded in Book 5154, Page 313 of Official Records. (DOES AFFECT, PLOTTED) 32.Easement, granted from Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, a Florida limited liability company to Hacienda Lakes Community Development District, a Community Development district formed and existing pursuant to chapter 190, Florida Statues, its successors and assigns, recorded in Book 5154, Page 320 of Official Records; as affected by Amendment to Sign Easement recorded in Book 5363, Page 382 of Official Records. (DOES AFFECT, PLOTTED) 33.The terms, provisions, and conditions contained in that certain Notice of Hurricane Vulnerability Zone, recorded in Book 5451, Page 531 of Official Records. (DOES AFFECT, BLANKET IN NATURE) 34.The terms, provisions, and conditions contained in that certain Recorded Notice of Environmental Resource Permit, recorded in Book 5942, Page 2406 of Official Records. (DOES AFFECT, BLANKET IN NATURE) 35.Easement, granted from Dr. Charles V. Gnau and Elizabeth K. Gnau, et. ux. to Collier County, Florida, Recorded in 981,Ppage 296. (Does not affect) 36. Matters shown on the Plat of Cadenza at Hacienda Lakes of Naples, recorded in Plat Book 74, Page 16. (Does not affect) 37. Easement, granted from Collier HMA Inc. to Collier County, Florida, recorded in Book 3958, Page 2205 of Official Records. (Does not affect) 38. Easement, granted from Sembler Family Partnership #42, ltd. to Collier HMA Inc., recorded in Book 4045, Page 2113 of Official Records. (Did affect at one time, however, expired November 30, 2006) 39. Riparian rights are not guaranteed or insured. Title to no portion of the herein described land lying below ordinary high water mark is hereby insured. 40. Riparian and/or littoral rights are not insured. 41. ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey prepared by Colliers Engineering & Design under certification and seal of Charles D. Ferraro, Florida Registered Land Surveyor No. 4768, dated February 14, 2024, last revised _______, 2024, designated as Project Jo. 21007015A, discloses the following matters: none NOTE: ALL OF THE RECORDING INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN REFERS TO THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ANY REFERENCE HEREIN TO A BOOK AND PAGE IS A REFERENCE TO THE OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK OF SAID COUNTY, UNLESS INDICATED TO THE CONTRARY. PURSUANT TO SECTION 6(C)(ii) OF THE MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS (EFFECTIVE DATE 2021) COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN HAS PLOTTED ANY RIGHTS OF WAY, EASEMENTS AND SERVITUDE'S BURDENING THE SURVEYED PROPERTY AS IDENTIFIED IN THE TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT OR OBTAINED BY THE SURVEYOR AND STATED IF EACH IS “SHOWN” OR “NOT SHOWN” ON THE SURVEY. THIS CLIENT HAS REQUESTED THAT THE SURVEYOR STATE IF, AS AN OPINION, THE RIGHTS OF WAY, EASEMENTS AND SERVITUDE “AFFECT” OR “DO NOT AFFECT” THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THESE OPINIONS ARE NOT TO BE CONSIDERED TO BE MADE WITH ANY LEGAL EXPRISE AND SHOULD BE REVIEWED BY CLIENT'S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE TO VERIFY VALIDITY PRIOR TO RELYING ON THOSE STATEMENTS. TRACT G, HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55, PAGES 10 THROUGH 21, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF, CONVEYED TO MHP FL VII, LLLP, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY VIRTUE OF THAT CERTAIN SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED, RECORDED IN BOOK 6170, PAGE 301 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 2: EASEMENTS AND OTHER INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY AS SET FORTH IN THAT CERTAIN JOINT ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN VISION & FAITH, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION AND COLLIER HMA, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION RECORDED IN BOOK 3241, PAGE 3464 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; AS AFFECTED BY AMENDMENT TO JOINT ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED IN BOOK 4045, PAGE 2151 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DEED BOOK 6170, PAGE 301 PRELIMI N A R Y Page 627 of 6526 RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD/CR 864 FO TEPED TEPED E FO E E COLLIER BOULEVARD (COUNTY ROAD 951)HY DG TEPED G G G HY D HY DHY D TEPED FO WHYDTEPED TEPED TEPED TEPED E TEPED G HY DTEPEDTEPED CURVE DATA 60 60 120 SCALE : 1" = 60' 0 Linear unit of measure: US Survey Foot (1 ft = 1200/3937 m) ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY FIELD BOOK:PAGE: 02 XXXX N S EW NORTHUNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO A SURVEY OR ENGINEERING MAP BEARING A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209, SUB-DIVISION 2, OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW.ONLY MAPS WITH THE LAND SURVEYOR OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S SEAL ARE GENUINE TRUE AND CORRECT COPIES OF THE LAND SURVEYOR OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER’S ORIGINAL WORK AND OPINION.REVDATEDRAWN BYDESCRIPTIONSHEET NUMBER: SCALE: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY:DATE: DRAWING NAME: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE: PROTECT YOURSELF Copyright © 2024. Colliers Engineering & Design All Rights Reserved. This drawing and all the information contained herein is authorized for use only by the party for whom the services were contracted or to whom it is certified. This drawing may not be copied, reused, disclosed, distributed or relied upon for any other purpose without the express written consent of Colliers Engineering & Design. ALL STATES REQUIRE NOTIFICATION OF EXCAVATORS, DESIGNERS, OR ANY PERSON PREPARING TO DISTURB THE EARTH'S SURFACE ANYWHERE IN ANY STATE FOR STATE SPECIFIC DIRECT PHONE NUMBERS VISIT: WWW.CALL811.COM V-SURV 2021\21007015A\Survey\Plans\V-SURV.dwg\V-02-SURVEY By: DFERRAROR REVIEWED BY: NOTE: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION. CITY OF PITTSBURGHDEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNINGAPPROVED: _______________________ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION _______________________ CHAIRMANATTEST: _______________________ _______________________SECRETARY Phone: Engineering & Design www.colliersengineering.com C O N S U L T I N G Engineering & Design ENGINEERS + SURVEYING ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PORTION TRACT G PLAT BOOK 55, PAGEs 10 THROUGH 21 SEC. 23, TWS 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST CITY OF NAPLES COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA AS SHOWN 01/03/2024 KE XXX 21007015A 02........................................__________________________ of FOR PTH HOLMDEL (Headquarters) 101 Crawfords Corner Road, Suite 3400 Holmdel, NJ 07733 732.383.1950 COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS MASER CONSULTING Doing Business as FO CABX FL HY D PRELIMI N A R Y Page 628 of 6526 RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD/CR 864 COLLIER BOULEVARD (COUNTY ROAD 951)PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL LAKE 13 ±0.50 ACRES FUTURE OUTPARCEL ±4.1 ACRES V V VV V V V V V V V V 20'20'20' 45' 126' 20' 60' 30'61'50'327.7'30'30'20' 20' 20' 20' 30' 30'20'10'10'10' 10'R55'7'12.5'52.5'61'43.9'24'10' 10' 10' 10' 10'63.5'96.5' 10.98' 111.9'204'33.4'112.6'162,671 SF 20'2 0 ' 49' 18' 18' 18' 20' 37'20'12' 15' 4'50'50'11'7.8'6'5.9'7.4'11'15'15'5.9'15'15' 20'20'30'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'7'20'30'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'7'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'20'24'20'24'20'20'24'20'11.5'24' 10'30'11.5' 8' 18.5' 495.5'20'24' 24' 24' 24'24'15'9.3'7' 24' 10' 28'92.5' 11.5' COSTCO DEMISED AREA BUILDING SETBACK LINE PROPOSED FULL ACCESS DRIVEWAY PROPOSED RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT DRIVEWAY PROPOSED RIGHT-IN / LEFT-OUT ACCESS DRIVEWAY RELOCATED STONE FPL SERVICE ROAD FUTURE FUEL FACILITY EXPANSION PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB (TYP.) PROPOSED CONCRETE STEP OFF CURB (TYP.)PROPOSED PAINTED WHITE STRIPPING, 4" WIDE (TYP.) PROPOSED CONCRETE STEP OFF CURB (TYP.) PROPOSED CONCRETE STEP OFF CURB (TYP.) PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT JOINT PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT JOINT PROPOSED PAINTED WHITE STRIPPING, 4" WIDE (TYP.) PROPOSED PAINTED WHITE STRIPPING, 4" WIDE (TYP.) PROPOSED CONCRETE STEP OFF CURB (TYP.) PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB (TYP.) THREE (3) - 40,000 GALLON FUEL STORAGE TANKS PROPOSED TRASH COMPACTOR FUEL FACILITY KIOSK (197 SF) PROPOSED MASONRY COMPACTOR SCREENING WITH METAL GATE PROPOSED STRUCTURALLY ATTACHED AND PLANTED TRELLIS (TYP) PROPOSED STRUCTURALLY ATTACHED AND PLANTED TRELLIS (TYP) PROPOSED GENERATORS BUILDING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 20' 210' DECELERATION RIGHT TURN LANE 210' DECELERATION RIGHT TURN LANE OUTPARCEL ACCESS DRIVE OUTPARCEL ACCESS DRIVE WHEEL STOP (TYP) LIGHT POLE BASE (TYP) FOUR (4) LOADING SPACES ONE (1) LOADING SPACE PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP) PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP) FUEL FACILITY GENERATOR FUEL FACILITY ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER WITH BOLLARDS R25' R65' R56' R56' R56' R56' R25' R25' R25' R25' R45' R45' R74' R74' R74' R74' R85' R50' 12'12' 5' R25' R50'R35' R35' R50' R50'R35' R50' R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R5' (U.N.O.) R35'R10' R20' R20' R35' R15' R25' R35' R25' R15' R20' R25' R10' R25'R2' R43' R65' R26' R30' R47.5' R10' R50' R60' R43' R50' R70' R100' R40' R15' R50' R65' R25' PROPOSED STRUCTURALLY ATTACHED AND PLANTED TRELLIS (TYP) R35' R3' 'LEFT ONLY' SIGN R25' R5' R20' Engineering & Design Architecture, Landscape Architecture,Surveying, CT P.C.Engineering& Design, Engineering & Design Architecture, Landscape Architecture,Surveying, CT P.C.Engineering& Design, UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO A SURVEY OR ENGINEERING MAP BEARING A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209, SUB-DIVISION 2, OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW.ONLY MAPS WITH THE LAND SURVEYOR OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S SEAL ARE GENUINE TRUE AND CORRECT COPIES OF THE LAND SURVEYOR OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER’S ORIGINAL WORK AND OPINION.REVDATEDRAWN BYDESCRIPTIONSHEET NUMBER: SCALE: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY:DATE: DRAWING NAME: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE: PROTECT YOURSELF Copyright © 2025. Colliers Engineering & Design All Rights Reserved. This drawing and all the information contained herein is authorized for use only by the party for whom the services were contracted or to whom it is certified. This drawing may not be copied, reused, disclosed, distributed or relied upon for any other purpose without the express written consent of Colliers Engineering & Design. ALL STATES REQUIRE NOTIFICATION OF EXCAVATORS, DESIGNERS, OR ANY PERSON PREPARING TO DISTURB THE EARTH'S SURFACE ANYWHERE IN ANY STATE FOR STATE SPECIFIC DIRECT PHONE NUMBERS VISIT: WWW.CALL811.COM C-LAYT 2024\24000317A\Engineering\Site Plans\C-LAYT.dwg\C-03-Dimension Plan By: SDONLEVIER REVIEWED BY: NOTE: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION. CITY OF PITTSBURGHDEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNINGAPPROVED: _______________________ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION _______________________ CHAIRMANATTEST: _______________________ _______________________SECRETARY Phone: www.colliersengineering.com C O N S U L T I N G ENGINEERS + SURVEYING REVDATEDRAWN BYDESCRIPTIONSITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA AS SHOWN 01/17/25 SVD RTM 24000317A 18101/31/25SVDREVISED PER FPL COMMENTS202/27/25JEHREVISED PER PDI REVIEW DATED 02/12/25303/18/25SVDREVISED PER COUNTY SUFFICIENCY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 01/27/25....................................................................___________________________ of FOR PTH EXTON 410 Eagleview Boulevard, Suite 104 Exton, PA 19341 610.254.9140 COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS MASER CONSULTING Doing Business as Russell T. McFall II FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LICENSE NUMBER: PE75738 COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC. N S EW NORTH50 50 100 SCALE : 1" = 50' 0 Linear unit of measure: US Survey Foot (1 ft = 1200/3937 m) DIMENSION PLAN 3 LEGENDEXISTING PROPOSED TRAVERSE LINE, CENTER LINE OR BASELINE (LABEL AS SUCH) RIGHT OF WAY LINE PROPERTY LINE EDGE OF PAVEMENT CURB DEPRESSED CURB SIDEWALK FENCES TREELINE ROADWAY SIGNS WETLAND LINE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY LINE X X X X 13+0012+00 BACK FACE 10 VHC STALL COUNT ADA ACCESSIBLE STALL DEPRESSED CURB AND ADA RAMP DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW 1.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS KNOWN AS PORTION OF TRACT 'G' OF HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, TRACT G REPLAT, PLAT BOOK 55, PAGES 10 THROUGH 21. 2.THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE HACIENDA LAKES MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONE DISTRICT AND CONTAINS A TOTAL TRACT AREA OF ±1,125,715 SF, ±25.84 ACRES. OWNER:HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC APPLICANT:COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 7742 ALICO ROAD 45940 HORSESHOE DRIVE, SUITE 150 FORT MYERS, FL 33912 STERLING, VA 20166 904-762-4454 703-885-4002 3.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS PRESENTLY UNDEVELOPED, HEAVILY WOODED LAND WITH A CLEARED UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE EASTERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CLEAR THE REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY AND FILL IT IN TO CONSTRUCT A COSTCO WHOLESALE WAREHOUSE WITH A FUEL FACILITY, PARKING LOTS, AND OTHER ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE. 4.ZONE DATA: MPUD - MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (E) = PRE-EXISTING NON-CONFORMING CONDITION (V) = VARIANCE REQUIRED * = VALUES ARE ALLOTMENTS FOR THE FUTURE AND ARE NOT A PART OF THIS SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5.THE FOLLOWING DEVIATIONS (PER AMENDED EXHIBIT E LIST OF DEVIATIONS TO ORD. 22-18) ARE BEING REQUESTED AS A PART OF AUTO SERVICE STATION WAIVER (ASW) PL20240011790 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE (PDI) PL20240011559: 5.1.DEVIATION #20 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.02.08, WHICH REQUIRES A MAXIMUM LIGHT POLE HEIGHT OF 25 FT, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A NEW MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36.5 FT. 5.2.DEVIATION #21 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.05.04.C, WHICH REQUIRES COMMERCIAL PROJECTS WITH A MINIMUM 80 PARKING SPACES AND OFF-STREET PARKING IN EXCESS OF 120% TO OBTAIN A VARIANCE AND PROVIDE DOUBLE THE LANDSCAPING REQUIRED IN INTERIOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS, TO INSTEAD NOT REQUIRE A VARIANCE AND ONLY PROVIDE THE NORMAL LANDSCAPING REQUIRED IN INTERIOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS AS REQUIRED IN LDC SECTION 4.06.03. 5.3.DEVIATION #22 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.05.06.B, WHICH REQUIRES MINIMUM LOADING SPACES OF 3, PLUS 1 FOR EACH 25,000 SF OVER 50,000 SF, TO INSTEAD ALLOW FOR A TOTAL OF 5 LOADING SPACES. 5.4.DEVIATION #23 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5.05.05.B.1, WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM 500 FT SEPARATION BETWEEN FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A MAXIMUM 132 FT SEPARATION BETWEEN THE COSTCO PARCEL AND THE 7-ELEVEN PARCEL LOCATED TO THE NORTH, SEPARATED BY RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD, A 4-LANE ARTERIAL. 5.5.DEVIATION #24 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.05.08.D.2.b.i, WHICH REQUIRES A TOTAL OF 45% GLAZING (GLASS) ON THE TOTAL COMBINED PRIMARY FACADES OF THE BUILDING, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A COMBINATION OF GLAZING AND PLANTED TRELLIS FEATURES TO ACCOUNT FOR A TOTAL OF 23% (12% GLAZING & 11% PLANTED TRELLIS). 5.6.DEVIATION #25 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.05.08.D.4, WHICH REQUIRES VARIATIONS IN BUILDING FACADE MASSING GREATER THAN 150 LINEAR FEET TO INCLUDE A BREAK IN THE FACADE MASSING, TO INSTEAD ALLOW STRUCTURALLY ATTACHED PLANTED TRELLIS FEATURES AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO PROVIDE AN ELEVATION BREAK OUT FOR VISUAL INTEREST ALONG THE BUILDING FACADE LENGTH. 5.7.DEVIATION #26 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.06.04.F.4, WHICH REQUIRES A MAXIMUM SIGNAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN NONRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS OF 750 SF, TO INSTEAD ALLOW FOR AN INCREASE OF 367 SF OVER THE MAXIMUM FOR A TOTAL OF 1,117 SF. 6.BOUNDARY SURVEY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS TAKEN FROM A PLAN ENTITLED “ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR COSTCO WHOLESALE”, DATED JANUARY 3, 2024, PREPARED BY COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN. 7.THE HORIZONTAL DATUM IS RELATIVE TO THE FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD1983 EAST (2011 ADJUSTMENT). THE VERTICAL DATUM IS RELATIVE TO NAVD 1988. 8.BENCHMARK REFERENCE: NGS BENCHMARK STAMP Y 526, ELEVATION: 11.42' (NAVD 1988). 9.THE LIMITS OF FRESHWATER WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED “ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR COSTCO WHOLESALE”, DATED JANUARY 3, 2024, PREPARED BY COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN AND IS PRELIMINARY AND WAITING FOR FINAL APPROVAL. 10.THE FLOOD ZONES DEPICTED HERON ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED “ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR COSTCO WHOLESALE”, DATED JANUARY 3, 2024, PREPARED BY COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN WHICH WAS PLOTTED BASED ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 12021C0606J, LAST REVISED FEBRUARY 8, 2024. 11.GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION AND SOIL TEST PIT LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE AS PRESENTED IN A REPORT ENTITLED “COSTCO WHOLESALE WAREHOUSE: NAPLES, FL - CW23-1027 - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT”, DATED MARCH 27, 2024, PREPARED BY TERRACON. 12.THIS SET OF PLANS IS NOT DEPICTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS OR A CERTIFICATION/WARRANTY REGARDING THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY IMPACTED SITE CONDITIONS. 13.THIS IS A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ELSEWHERE HEREON, IS NOT A SURVEY. 14.DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS AS THEY PERTAIN TO ADJACENT AND SURROUNDING PHYSICAL CONDITIONS, BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, ETC. THEY ARE SCHEMATIC ONLY, EXCEPT WHERE DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN THERETO. 15.THIS SET OF PLANS HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSES OF MUNICIPAL AND AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL. THIS SET OF PLANS SHALL NOT BE UTILIZED AS CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS UNTIL ALL APPROVALS REQUIRED HAVE BEEN OBTAINED, ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL HAVE BEEN SATISFIED AND THE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN STAMPED “ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION”. THIS SHALL INCLUDE APPROVAL OF ALL CATALOG CUTS, SHOP DRAWINGS AND/OR DESIGN CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT OWNER AND/OR MUNICIPAL ENGINEER. 16.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROJECT SAFETY, INCLUDING PROVISION OF ALL APPROPRIATE SAFETY DEVICES AND TRAINING REQUIRED. 17.PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL 811 TO REQUEST A UTILITY MARKOUT. 18.THE COSTCO WAREHOUSE BUILDING WILL BE OF TYPE V-B CONSTRUCTION AND THE COSTCO FUEL FACILITY WILL BE OF TYPE II-B CONSTRUCTION. SITE NOTES 1.BUILDING FOOTPRINT DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE. FINAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT DIMENSIONS FOR EACH BUILDING SHALL BE FURNISHED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS WHEN APPLYING FOR A BUILDING PERMIT. ALL STRUCTURES SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROVED BULK ZONING REQUIREMENTS. 2.CURB RAMPS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED FLUSH WITH THE FINISHED PAVEMENT SURFACE. ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPS INSTALLED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY ARE TO HAVE DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES COMPLIANT WITH FEDERAL ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC ROW. 3.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE/STRIPING SHALL CORRESPOND TO THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. 4.REFUSE AND RECYCLABLES SHALL BE STORED WITHIN OUTSIDE SCREENED COMPACTORS AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND PICKED UP BY PRIVATE WASTE DISPOSAL HAULER. 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPER DISPOSAL OF ALL WASTE MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING REGULATIONS AND AGENCIES. 6.THERE SHALL BE NO ON-SITE BURIAL OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, TREE BRANCHES, STUMPS, OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS. 7.MATERIALS, WORKMANSHIP, AND CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH: A.THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, LATEST VERSION. B.FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION," LATEST VERSION. C.CURRENT PREVAILING MUNICIPAL, COUNTY, AND/OR STATE AGENCY SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, CONDITIONS, AND REQUIREMENTS. D.CURRENT PREVAILING UTILITY COMPANY/AUTHORITY SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, AND REQUIREMENTS. E.CURRENT MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, AND REQUIREMENTS. REQUIRED EXISTING COSTCO FUTURE OUTPARCEL MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 SF ±1,125,715 SF ±25.84 ACRES 949,044 SF 21.79 ACRES 176,677 SF 4.06 ACRES MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FT 1,235 FT 1,114 FT 253 FT PRINCIPAL BUILDING MINIMUM YARD (FROM LOT BOUNDARY)25 FT N/A 52.5 FT T.B.D. MINIMUM YARD (FROM MPUD BOUNDARY)25 FT N/A 61 FT T.B.D. MAXIMUM ZONED BUILDING HEIGHT 50 FT N/A 34 FT T.B.D. MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 60 FT N/A 34 FT T.B.D. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 600 SF N/A 162,671 SF T.B.D. MINIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT 600 SF N/A 162,671 SF T.B.D. ACCESSORY BUILDING MINIMUM YARD (FROM LOT BOUNDARY)10 FT N/A 111.9 FT T.B.D. MINIMUM YARD (FROM MPUD BOUNDARY)10 FT N/A 204 FT T.B.D. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 10 FT N/A N/A T.B.D. MAXIMUM ZONED BUILDING HEIGHT 25 FT N/A 8.92 FT T.B.D. MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 30 FT N/A 8.92 FT T.B.D. MINIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT 80 SF N/A 197 SF T.B.D. MAXIMUM BUILDING (LOT) COVERAGE N/A 0.00%17.2%25.5% * MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE N/A 1.48%71.4%51.0% * BUFFER 10 FT 10.98 FT 11 FT T.B.D. PARKING USE: 1 SPACE/250 SF RETAIL/OFFICE AREAS 652 SPACES 0 SPACES 819 SPACES T.B.D. LOADING PER TABLE 18 IN COLLIER COUNTY LD CODE SECTION 4.05.06.B 8 SPACES 0 SPACES 5 SPACES (V)T.B.D. ADA SPACES 2% TOTAL 0 SPACES 17 SPACES T.B.D. BUILDING AREA N/A 107 SF 162,868 SF 45,061 SF* NON-BUILDING IMPERVIOUS AREA N/A 16,541 SF 514,612 SF 45,028 SF* LAKE/WETLAND AREA N/A 848,716 SF 18,515 SF 3,265 SF* GREEN AREA N/A 260,352 SF 253,049 SF 83,323 SF* GENERAL NOTES 09/01/22MCNJ-CVER-NOTE-1000 MOD: 09/10/24 5.THE FOLLOWING DEVIATIONS (PER AMENDED EXHIBIT E LIST OF DEVIATIONS TO ORD. 22-18) ARE BEING REQUESTED AS A PART OF AUTO SERVICE STATION WAIVER (ASW) PL20240011790 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE (PDI) PL20240011559: 5.1.DEVIATION #20 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.02.08, WHICH REQUIRES A MAXIMUM LIGHT POLE HEIGHT OF 25 FT, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A NEW MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36.5 FT. 5.2.DEVIATION #21 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.05.04.C, WHICH REQUIRES COMMERCIAL PROJECTS WITH A MINIMUM 80 PARKING SPACES AND OFF-STREET PARKING IN EXCESS OF 120% TO OBTAIN A VARIANCE AND PROVIDE DOUBLE THE LANDSCAPING REQUIRED IN INTERIOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS, TO INSTEAD NOT REQUIRE A VARIANCE AND ONLY PROVIDE THE NORMAL LANDSCAPING REQUIRED IN INTERIOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS AS REQUIRED IN LDC SECTION 4.06.03. 5.3.DEVIATION #22 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.05.06.B, WHICH REQUIRES MINIMUM LOADING SPACES OF 3, PLUS 1 FOR EACH 25,000 SF OVER 50,000 SF, TO INSTEAD ALLOW FOR A TOTAL OF 5 LOADING SPACES. 5.4.DEVIATION #23 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5.05.05.B.1, WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM 500 FT SEPARATION BETWEEN FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A MAXIMUM 132 FT SEPARATION BETWEEN THE COSTCO PARCEL AND THE 7-ELEVEN PARCEL LOCATED TO THE NORTH, SEPARATED BY RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD, A 4-LANE ARTERIAL. 5.5.DEVIATION #24 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.05.08.D.2.b.i, WHICH REQUIRES A TOTAL OF 45% GLAZING ('GLASS') ON THE TOTAL COMBINED PRIMARY FACADES OF THE BUILDING, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A COMBINATION OF GLAZING AND PLANTED TRELLIS FEATURES TO ACCOUNT FOR A TOTAL OF 23% (12% GLAZING & 11% PLANTED TRELLIS). 5.6.DEVIATION #25 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.05.08.D.4, WHICH REQUIRES VARIATIONS IN BUILDING FACADE MASSING GREATER THAN 150 LINEAR FEET TO INCLUDE A BREAK IN THE FACADE MASSING, TO INSTEAD ALLOW STRUCTURALLY ATTACHED PLANTED TRELLIS FEATURES AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO PROVIDE AN ELEVATION BREAK OUT FOR VISUAL INTEREST ALONG THE BUILDING FACADE LENGTH. 5.7.DEVIATION #26 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 05.06.04.F.4, WHICH REQUIRES A MAXIMUM SIGNAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN NONRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS OF 750 SF, TO INSTEAD ALLOW FOR AN INCREASE OF 367 SF OVER THE MAXIMUM FOR A TOTAL OF 1,117 SF. BUFFER PER LDC BUFFER PER LDC BUFFER PER LDC BUFFER PER LDC (PENDING FPL APPROVAL) BUFFER PER LDC Page 629 of 6526 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) at 9:00 A.M. on July 17, 2025, in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL to consider: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 11-41, AS AMENDED, THE HACIENDA LAKES MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TO APPROVE AN INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE PUD, TO ADD DEVIATIONS FOR RELIEF FROM THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE RELATING TO ARCHITECTURAL GLAZING STANDARDS, BUILDING FAÇADE MASSING, LIGHT FIXTURE HEIGHTS, LOADING SPACES, LANDSCAPE STANDARDS FOR INTERIOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS, AND SIGNAGE, TO REVISE A TRANSPORTATION COMMITMENT, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PARCEL IS IN THE COMMERCIAL TRACT OF THE MPUD AND IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF ±25.86 ACRES OF THE ± 2,262 ACRE MPUD. [PL20240011559] AND A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, GRANTING A WAIVER FROM THE MINIMUM REQUIRED SEPARATION OF 500 FEET BETWEEN FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS PURSUANT TO SECTION 5.05.05.B OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A COSTCO WHOLESALE, WITH A RESULTING SEPARATION DISTANCE OF 132 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE OF THE EXISTING 7-ELEVEN. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE COMMERCIAL TRACT OF THE HACIENDA LAKES MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF ±25.86 ACRES OF THE ± 2,262 ACRE MPUD. [PL20240011790] Page 630 of 6526 All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed Ordinance will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 401, Naples, FL 34112, one (1) week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, prior to July 17, 2025. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/calendar- of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done i n advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Ray Bellows at 252-2463 or email to Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Page 631 of 6526 Collier County Planning Commission Joseph K. Schmitt, Chairman Page 632 of 6526 See reverse for more information PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Costco Wholesale (PDI) & (ASW) Petition Type: Planned Unit Development Insubstantial Change & Auto Service Station Waiver Petition No.: PL20240011559 & PL20240011790 Planner Name: Sean Sammon Phone: (239) 252-8422 Collier County Planning Commission: Date: 7/17/2025 Time: 09:00 AM Location: 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Building F, Naples, FL 34112 This is to advise you of an upcoming public hearing because you may have interest in the proceedings, or you own property located near the vicinity of the following property. For more information, or to register to participate remotely: https://bit.ly/Public__Hearings *Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For difficulties registering please call Ailyn Padron at (239) 252-5187 or email to ailyn.padron@CollierCountyFL.Gov. Meeting information: Individual speakers may be limited to five (5) minutes on any item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the agenda packets must submit materials a minimum of ten (10) days prior to the respective public hearing, to the county staff member noted above. All material used in presentations before the Collier County Planning Commission will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. This petition and other pertinent information related to this petition is kept on file and may be reviewed at the Growth Management Community Development Department building located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Page 633 of 6526 Collier County Planning Commission to consider the following: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 11-41, AS AMENDED, THE HACIENDA LAKES MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TO APPROVE AN INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE PUD, TO ADD DEVIATIONS FOR RELIEF FROM THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE RELATING TO ARCHITECTURAL GLAZING STANDARDS, BUILDING FAÇADE MASSING, LIGHT FIXTURE HEIGHTS, LOADING SPACES, LANDSCAPE STANDARDS FOR INTERIOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS, AND SIGNAGE, TO REVISE A TRANSPORTATION COMMITMENT, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PARCEL IS IN THE COMMERCIAL TRACT OF THE MPUD AND IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF ±25.86 ACRES OF THE ± 2,262 ACRE MPUD. [PL20240011559] AND A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, GRANTING A WAIVER FROM THE MINIMUM REQUIRED SEPARATION OF 500 FEET BETWEEN FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS PURSUANT TO SECTION 5.05.05.B OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A COSTCO WHOLESALE, WITH A RESULTING SEPARATION DISTANCE OF 132 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE OF THE EXISTING 7-ELEVEN. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE COMMERCIAL TRACT OF THE HACIENDA LAKES MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF ±25.86 ACRES OF THE ± 2,262 ACRE MPUD. [PL20240011790] Page 634 of 6526 SOUTH FRONTAGE Page 635 of 6526 NORTH FRONTAGE Page 636 of 6526 WEST FRONTAGE Page 637 of 6526 [24-CPS-02559/1971349/1]158 Hacienda Lakes/PL20240011559 9/23/25 Text underlined is added; text struck-through is deleted. 1 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-_____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 11-41, AS AMENDED, THE HACIENDA LAKES MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TO APPROVE AN INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE PUD, TO ADD DEVIATIONS FOR RELIEF FROM THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE RELATING TO ARCHITECTURAL GLAZING STANDARDS, BUILDING FAÇADE MASSING, LIGHT FIXTURE HEIGHTS, LOADING SPACES, LANDSCAPE STANDARDS FOR INTERIOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS, AND SIGNAGE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PARCEL IS IN THE COMMERCIAL TRACT OF THE MPUD AND IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF ±25.86 ACRES OF THE ± 2,262 ACRE MPUD [PL20240011559] WHEREAS, on October 25, 2011, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance No. 11-41, which established the Hacienda Lakes Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning district; and WHEREAS, on May 22, 2022, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance No. 2022-18, which amended the Hacienda Lakes MPUD; and WHEREAS, Costco Wholesale Corporation, a Washington corporation, represented by Brad C. Wester of Driver McAfee Hawthorne & Diebenow, PLLC, filed a petition to request approval of an insubstantial change to the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT E, LIST OF DEVIATIONS, ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 11-41, AS AMENDED, THE HACIENDA LAKES MPUD Exhibit “E” attached to Ordinance No. 11-41, as amended, the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, is hereby amended and replaced with Exhibit “E” and Exhibit “E-5”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Page 638 of 6526 [24-CPS-02559/1971349/1]158 Hacienda Lakes/PL20240011559 9/23/25 Text underlined is added; text struck-through is deleted. 2 of 2 SECTION TWO: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ______ day of __________________, 2025. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: _______________________ By: ____________________________________ Deputy Clerk Burt L. Saunders, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: _________________________________ Heidi F. Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Exhibit E – Revised List of Requested Deviations Exhibit E-5 – Costco- Elevation and Signage Exhibit Page 639 of 6526 September 17, 2025 PL20240011559 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.01.B, related to streets in subdivisions, that requires subdivisions to have platted road rights- of-way for streets, to allow private streets to be provided by separate access easements rather than platted road rights-of-way. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c that limits the number of model homes, to allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the various phases or communities within the project. The number of model homes may exceed five for each phase or community within the project but shall not exceed a total of 60 models for the entire MPUD development. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 to allow " boundary marker" signage on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways that provide access to the MPUD. The sign content area for " boundary markers" to be in the Residential Tract R may be 15 feet in height rather than 8 feet in height as limited in LDC Subsection 5.06.02B.6.b. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2. that limits fence or wall heights to six (6') feet, to allow fences or walls to be no greater than eight (8') feet throughout the development. Where associated greater with existing or future public roadways, or Tract A, a 20 foot tall visual screen may be installed as a wall, berm, or wall/ berm combination. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.02.13.G., and 4.06.02.C.5., that requires a six-foot tall opaque architecturally finished masonry wall, or berm, or combination thereof be provided around the boundaries of a business park. Buffering around the proposed Business Park Tract would be as required by the entirety of the referenced sections of the LDC, but the six-foot wall, or berm, or combination thereof will not be required on the Business Park Tract along the frontage of Lord' s Way. Deviation #6 seeks to allow one real estate sign in addition to the real estate signage permitted in LDC Section5.06.02.B.2., that would be erected off-site from the Residential Tract, in the Commercial Tract. Deviation #7 The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain in the present location until: the sign is relocated to allow the construction of the bridge to extend Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and/or a new sign can be permitted in Tract C. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.1. that limits care unit Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 0.45, to allow a care unit FAR of 0.60. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to a residential development with a maximum height of 8 feet, to allow for one (1) ground sign with a maximum height of 13 feet at the entrance to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes as shown on Attachment E- 2, Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Entry Sign Location Map. Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 10 feet for residential entry signage at Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E- 3, Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto. Page 640 of 6526 September 17, 2025 PL20240011559 Page 2 of 3 Deviation #11 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two ( 2) ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet, to allow for one ( 1) total ground or wall sign with a maximum sign area of 80 square feet at the entrance to the Azure at Hacienda Lakes as depicted on Exhibit E- 3, Azure at Hacienda Lakes Primary Sign Plan Elevation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 3, attached hereto. Deviation #12 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead-end streets, to allow one (1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development, as depicted on Exhibit E-3, Sign Location Map, Sheet 3 of 3, attached hereto. Deviation #13 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.02.F, which requires that off-street parking must be arranged so that no motor vehicles have to back onto any street, excluding single- family and two- family residential dwellings and churches, to allow for back out parking from the proposed off-street parking for multi-family dwellings within the Azure at Hacienda Lakes residential development, as depicted on Exhibit B-2, attached hereto. Deviation #14 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which allows for a maximum height of 8 feet for residential entry signs, to allow for a maximum sign height of 12 feet for residential entry signage at Hacienda Lakes - North Area as depicted on Exhibit E- 4, Hacienda Lakes - North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 2 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #15 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet, to allow for two (2) ground or wall signs that are 64 square feet each. which include signage for each of the residential developments which share access to Collier Boulevard at the entrance to the Hacienda Lakes - North Area, as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1of 2, attached hereto. This deviation is subject to conditions that secondary signage is specifically for the two "R" Tract properties labeled "Future Development" that are immediately fronting and adjacent to the intersection of the entry road with Collier Boulevard, and no other signage for these two "R" Tract properties is permitted facing Collier Boulevard. Deviation #16 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.14, which allows boundary marker signs to be a maximum of 24 square feet to allow for two boundary marker signs with a maximum of 32 square feet at the Hacienda Lakes – North Area, as depicted on Exhibit B -4, Hacienda Lakes – North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #17 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead-end streets except when designed as a cul-de-sac, to allow one (1) dead-end street at the terminus of a local street within the Hacienda Lakes - North Area residential development, as depicted on Exhibit E-4, Hacienda Lakes - North Area Sign Deviation Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2, attached hereto. Deviation #18 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, which requires landscape buffers to separate developments, to allow for no buffer along the northern PUD boundary in either or both of the following circumstances: 1) West of the FPL easement if the abutting properties are rezoned or amended to provide for a unified development plan of the northern property (currently Agriculture- zoned property) and the Hacienda Lakes - North Area properties prior to approval of an SDP or PPL; 2) East of the FPL easement if the abutting property to the north (currently Willow Run RPUD) is rezoned to provide for no adjacent buffer, as depicted on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. Page 641 of 6526 September 17, 2025 PL20240011559 Page 3 of 3 Deviation #19 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, which permits a maximum fence/ wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts, to instead allow for a decorative wall with maximum height of 14 feet in the location shown on Exhibit C-2, attached hereto. DEVIATIONS #20 THROUGH #25 APPLY TO THE WESTERN 25.86 (+/-) ACRES OF TRACT G OF THE HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES PLAT RECORDED IN PB 55 PAGE 19, LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD AND COLLIER BOULEVARD (THE “COSTCO PARCEL”) Deviation #20 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.08, which requires a maximum light pole height of 25 feet, to instead allow a new maximum height of 36.5 feet. Deviation #21 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04.C, which requires commercial projects with a minimum 80 parking spaces and off-street parking in excess of 120% to obtain a variance and provide double the landscaping required in interior vehicular use areas, to instead not require a variance and only provide the landscaping required in interior vehicular use areas as required in LDC Section 4.06.03 without doubling the required landscaping, and provide 25% additional tree/plant quantities calculated by the distance of the full perimeter buffers to be located along select areas of the perimeter of the property. Deviation #22 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.06.B, which requires minimum loading spaces of 3, plus 1 for each 25,000 square feet over 50,000 square feet, to instead allow for a total amount of 5 loading spaces. Deviation #23 seeks relief from LDC Section 05.05.08.D.2.b.i, which requires a total of 45% glazing (‘glass’) on the total three combined primary façades of the building, to instead allow a combination of glazing and planted trellis features for a total of 23% (12% glazing and 11% planted trellis). Deviation #24 seeks relief from LDC Section 05.05.08.D.4, which requires variations in building façade massing greater than 150 linear feet for buildings 40,000 square feet or larger, to include a break in the façade massing, to instead allow structurally attached planted trellis features as an alternative to provide an elevation break out for visual interest along the building façade length. Deviation #25 seeks relief from LDC Sections 5.06.04.F.4 and 5.06.04.F.a for on-premises non- residential wall, mansard, canopy or awning signs as follows: 1. Single occupancy parcels where there is double frontage on a public right of way are allowed 2 signs, to instead allow 4 signs as shown on Exhibit E-5, Costco Warehouse Sign Elevation Exhibit ; and 2. Which allows a maximum display area of 250 square feet per sign for a total of 500 square feet, to instead allow a total maximum display area of 801 square feet for 4 signs. Page 642 of 6526 Page 643 of 6526 1 Sean Sammon From:Ray Bellows Sent:Friday, April 18, 2025 1:26 PM To:Sean Sammon Subject:FW: Proposal for Collier and Rattlesnake Hammock FYI Ray Bellows Manager - Planning Zoning Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov From: johnsweeney224560@gmail.com <johnsweeney224560@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2025 11:53 AM To: Ray Bellows <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Proposal for Collier and Rattlesnake Hammock EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners Members of the Collier County Planning Commission Thank you for taking a few minutes to read this message and I appreciate your consideration of this suggestion. The intersection of Collier and Rattlesnake Hammock is poised to be one of the most densely populated residential areas in Collier County. Besides the existing single family, condo and RV developments near that intersection, five very large multi-family buildings have been recently constructed and five more are currently under construction. There are more multi-family buildings planned just east of the existing five under construction. That is an enormous amount of people moving to the area within a short distance of the Collier-Rattlesnake Hammock intersection. The land at the Southeast corner of Collier and Rattlesnake Hammock was designated commercial many years ago when the Hacienda Lakes PUD was created. I am sure at that time the County had no idea there would be so much residential development at that corner. Currently there are no Collier County public park or recreational facilities anywhere east of Collier Blvd between Beck Blvd and Tamiami Trail – a distance of approximately 7 miles. Page 644 of 6526 2 Given the massive population growth expected over the next 2 years, it would be wonderful if Collier County would use the land at the SE corner of Collier and Rattlesnake Hammock to create some public park facilities. Of course I understand that it would have to be re-zoned, but I do hope the County put its residents first. Here are some thoughts: Plan 1 – Collier County to purchase the land to create a very nice park, with a nature walk, pickleball courts, dog park, playground, etc. The County would then sell of part of the land to a developer for a small strip mall that would serve the local residents. Plan 2 – Collier County to purchase the land and create a “downtown” for Hacienda Lakes. Some shops, some entertainment venues and a walkable “downtown” with parks and nature area. Maybe even add a library branch as well. I know this is a huge departure from the current plans and designs, but I ask you to please give it some thought. Sincerely, John Sweeney 9220 Cayman, Naples Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Page 645 of 6526 1 Sean Sammon From:Michael Bosi Sent:Monday, March 10, 2025 8:04 AM To:Sean Sammon; Ray Bellows Subject:FW: Proposed Costco on Collier Sean, For the file on the petitions. Thanks, mike Michael Bosi AICP Division Director - Planning & Zoning Zoning Office:239-252-1061 Mobile:239-877-0705 2800 North Horseshoe drive Naples, Florida 34104 Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov From: jschmitt@comcast.net <jschmitt@comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, March 9, 2025 3:55 PM To: Ray Bellows <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; Michael Bosi <Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Proposed Costco on Collier EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Forwarded for the petition record. Joe From: johnsweeney224560@gmail.com <johnsweeney224560@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, March 9, 2025 11:09 AM To: jschmitt@comcast.net Subject: Proposed Costco on Collier Dear Mr. Schmitt, My wife and I are homeowners in the Azure subdivision of Hacienda Lakes. We were very happy to read that the proposed new Costco at Collier and Rattlesnake-Hammock will have to be reviewed by the Collier County Planning Commission rather than a hearing examiner. Page 646 of 6526 2 I did attend the recent “information” meeting with Costco, but to be honest, Costco was not very open, and they certainly gave a very different picture of the situation than what Rick LoCastro has written in his newsletter. The Collier-Rattlesnake Hammock area is primarily residential, but we do know that the parcel upon which they want to build is zoned Commercial. Most of us had been expecting smaller stores that would serve the neighborhood. The proposed Costco with a gas station with the entrance and exit on the Rattlesnake Hammock extension was quite a shock. I suggest that the County purchases that land and create a public park, with maybe a few smaller stores on out lots. There are no public parks on the East side of Collier from Davis to 41, yet there are an amazing number of new residential buildings and houses going up in the area. A park with a nature walk, dog park, etc., would so very welcome by the residents of the apartments, condos, senior living and houses in the area. I know this would be a very ambitious project to change the zoning, but please give some thought to creating a public park which is badly needed in the area. At the end of this letter are some thoughts from my wife and I on the Costco situation. Please read if you have a few more moments. Sincerely, John Sweeney, Celeste Sweeney 1. TRAFFIC At the recent meeting where Costo did a Q&A for local residents, the Costco representative said they expect a minimum 4500 vehicles a day to enter and exit their facility (before the extended hours announcement). The majority of those vehicles would have to enter and exit onto Rattlesnake Hammock. The Costco representative said that since Rattlesnake Hammock is a multi-lane divided highway, there should be no issue with the traffic. While Rattlesnake Hammock west of Collier is pretty much exactly that with 3 lanes in each direction and a 45mph speed limit, Rattlesnake Hammock east of Collier is more of a residential parkway that is a little less than a mile in length, 2 lanes in each direction and a 40mph speed limit. Clearly Rattlesnake Hammock is different east and west of Collier. There are no businesses east of Collier on Rattlesnake Hammock facing Rattlesnake Hammock. A number of new apartment and condos are being constructed – all residential. With less than 1,000 homes in Azure and Esplanade, there are no current traffic concerns east of Collier on Rattlesnake Hammock. At the time of the meeting, Costco hours were 10am to 8pm. 4500+ vehicles a day on Rattlesnake Hammock would mean an average of 560+ vehicles an hour, or 10 vehicles every minute. That is a huge increase in traffic for a residential parkway. Costco indicated that the volume of traffic would be so significant that they proposed a stoplight be constructed in the middle of the residential neighborhood on Rattlesnake Hammock to make sure their customers can exit. Costco has since decided to expand their gasoline sales hours, so the number of vehicles will likely increase. Rattlesnake Hammock east of Collier was not designed as a commercial road and is certainly not a “highway” as characterized by Costco. The best way to eliminate the traffic issues on Rattlesnake Hammock is to add an entrance and exit on Collier. I realize this has its own issues, including disruption of the multi-use path, bridges over the canal, negotiations with the hospital, etc., but it makes so much more sense than feeding all the traffic into a residential neighborhood. I believe it is unusual to have Costco store with a gas station and service bays built in the middle of a residential area. 2. Fuel Station Currently the intersection of Collier and Rattlesnake Hammock has two fueling stations in existence and both have access from Collier. Over the years, the County has developed many statutes, building codes, ordinances, etc. that allow our County to remain beautiful. The proposed Costco has indicated that they will apply for a variance to the 500 foot distance rule. We see no reason why the County should grant this variance. The county rules have been established for good reasons and Costco should not receive any special treatment. They have options – move the fuel operation so it is further away or build a Costco without a fuel station. Without a fuel station, the traffic would be less and alleviate some of the traffic concerns listed above. Page 647 of 6526 1 Sean Sammon From:Lauren Trethewey <ltretheweysunshinestate@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, February 24, 2025 12:36 PM To:Christine Willoughby Cc:Sean Sammon Subject:Re: Inquiry Regarding Costco Planning Project (PL20240000445) Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello Christine, Thank you for your quick response, I really appreciate the information. I understand that Costco has not submitted any Site Development Plans for review yet, and I appreciate the clarification on the review process. Sean , I know both Communities have some concerns on this project, how do we go about a public petitions. Thank you in advance for your help, On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:27 PM Christine Willoughby <Christine.Willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Hello Lauren, Costco has not submitted any Site Development Plans for review, as of yet. I only review the SDP plans and do not review the public petitions. Site Development Plans are administratively approved and do not require public input. Sean Sammons is the reviewer for the public petitions, I have copied him on this email to make him aware of your concerns. I am not sure what road you are speaking about since I have not reviewed any site development plans. Page 648 of 6526 2 Christine Willoughby Planner III Development Review Office:239-252-5748 , Collier County Growth Management Division Christine.Willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov From: Lauren Trethewey <ltretheweysunshinestate@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2025 11:49 AM To: Christine Willoughby <Christine.Willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Inquiry Regarding Costco Planning Project (PL20240000445) EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Afternoon Christine, I hope you're doing well. I am reaching out regarding the Costco Planning Project Application Number PL20240000445. I was wondering if there have been any updates or new information available on this matter. I am particularly concerned about the zoning waiver discussed at the last meeting, where Costco seemed confident they would receive approval. My main concern is the proximity of the proposed gas station. The 500-foot distance requirement is clearly in place for environmental reasons, among others. However, the fact that the proposed distance is only 132 feet is troubling. While I understand the property is zoned commercial, the anticipated increase in traffic—especially with the addition of 4,500 more cars, including those from new apartments and the upcoming school—makes the gas station's proximity even more concerning. Additionally, I was hoping you could provide more information about the new road being constructed near the Azure Hacienda Lakes gate. Do you know where this road will lead, and whether it will provide Page 649 of 6526 3 another access point to the Rattlesnake Costco? Unfortunately, Costco was unable to provide clarification on this. I appreciate any insights you can provide and look forward to your response. Best regards, -- To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. May be an image of 1 person and text that says 'Lauren RE Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. -- To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. May be an image of 1 person and text that says 'Lauren RE Page 650 of 6526 1 Sean Sammon From:Linda Ann Ventura <venturalindaann@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, March 2, 2025 7:37 AM To:Sean Sammon Subject:Yes to COSTCO near us!! EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Sean: We would love for COSTCO to be built near or next to Rattlesnake Hammock ( not certain the exact location) in east Naples. We have much housing construction going on and many families will appreciate the proximity to a pretty amazing grocery/everything store. Not to mention the jobs that will be created! Hoping this happens, Linda Ann Ventura 307 Tamarindo Ln Naples, Fl 34114 239-777-4976 Page 651 of 6526 1 Sean Sammon From:Norma H <quakefriscofog@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, February 19, 2025 6:50 AM To:Sean Sammon Subject:Costco EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I support the new costco to be located on the corner of Rattlesnake and Collier Blvd. Page 652 of 6526 1 Sean Sammon From:Frank E. LaPorta <felaporta@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:56 PM To:Sean Sammon Subject:Costco EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I am a full time resident of the Tamarindo Community just down the road from the proposed new Costco off Collier & Rattlesnake. Please know I am in full support of this project. Frank E. LaPorta 325 Spiaggio Court Naples, Florida 34114 Page 653 of 6526 1 Sean Sammon From:Tiffany Bray <tiffany.bray13@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, February 19, 2025 5:55 PM To:Sean Sammon Subject:Proposed Costco PL20240011559/PL20240011790 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Evening Sean, I wanted to reach out and express my support for the proposed Costco in Hacienda Lakes. I am a homeowner in a nearby community (Tamarindo) and I believe having a resource like Costco would be a good value to our area. I wasn't able to attend last night's NIM but I do work for a civil engineering firm and I understand the County's zoning process. I've been tracking this for some time and I hope they get to move dirt on this one. As a native to Naples my husband and I see the value of this new development being something that will support working class year round residents and not just the seasonal residents that appear to have been in abundance at the meeting yesterday. I've heard rumor that this will be scheduled for HEX, would you please let me know when the next hearing is scheduled for this site? Thank you, Tiffany Bray tiffany.bray13@gmail.com 239-776-9499 Page 654 of 6526 1 Sean Sammon From:Jessica Rodriguez <jesjoyrod@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 7:12 PM To:Sean Sammon Subject:Costco EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good evening Mr. Sammon, I hope you are doing well. I wanted to reach out to let the County know that I am in full support of the proposed Costco and to ask that this email be made part of their application. I am a resident in Tamarindo HOA near Hacienda Lakes where the neighborhood informational meeting for the Costco was held tonight. I attended that meeting and am very much in support of the proposed Costco. I was born and raised here in Naples and in this area of town there’s a lot of housing but not enough other infrastructure to support the area. People who work full time like myself often can’t go to these types of meetings and so often our voices aren’t heard, but please know that there is community support for this type of project. I would much rather see a Costco or some other retailer that provides goods and services that benefit the community and generate employment opportunities than another self-storage or more housing. Thank you. -- Sincerely, Jessica Rodriguez Claro 239-293-6709 Page 655 of 6526 1 Sean Sammon From:John M. Ventura <jventur4@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, March 2, 2025 7:36 AM To:Sean Sammon Subject:Costco in 34114 Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Sean, I fully support the addition of putting a Costco in the 34114 zip code of Naples FL (it is my understanding that it would be between Physicians Regional Hospital on Collier Blvd and the Hacienda Lakes development, on the east side of Collier). I'm sure you are investigating environmental and traffic impact and would trust the opinions of those experts. So, barring any significant detrimental effects of either of those two items, I fully support this addition of a new Costco. John John M Ventura 307 Tamarindo Lane Naples, FL 34114 585-943-7680 Page 656 of 6526 1 Sean Sammon From:John Bender <jrbender@comcast.net> Sent:Friday, February 21, 2025 9:26 AM To:Sean Sammon Subject:Costco on Rattlesnake Hammock EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme cauon when opening a#achments or clicking links. My wife and I live in Tamarindo located at Sabal Palm and Collier Blvd., very close to the proposed Costco. We are very excited about Costco coming to Ra#lesnake Hammock as are many of our neighbors. We just wanted to voice our support of the new locaon. Thank you, John Bender 419 Polihale Way, Naples Sent from my iPad Page 657 of 6526 g1Q117^ t9z4b° N l ORDINANCE NO. 11- 41pJ AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE 9ZSZVS NUMBER 2004 -41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE AGRICULTURAL (A) AGRICULTURAL- SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY (A -ST) AND PUD ZONING DISTRICT SWAMP BUGGY DAYS PUD) TO THE MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT KNOWN AS THE HACIENDA LAKES MPUD THAT WILL ALLOW A MAXIMUM OF 327,500 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS RETAIL COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA; 70,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF PROFESSIONAL AND MEDICAL OFFICE SPACE INCLUDING A CONVERSION OF RETAIL USE TO PROFESSIONAL AND MEDICAL OFFICE; 135 HOTEL ROOMS INCLUDING A CONVERSION TO BUSINESS PARK; 140,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PARK OR EDUCATION FACILITY; A PUBLIC SCHOOL; CONTINUATION OF EXISTING "SWAMP BUGGY” ATTRACTION AND "JUNIOR DEPUTY" PASSIVE RECREATION; AND A MAXIMUM OF 1,760 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS INCLUDING CONVERSIONS TO RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK AND SENIOR HOUSING FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING, ASSISTED LIVING AND NURSING CARE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, CONSISTING OF 2,262 +/- ACRES IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951) AT THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE- HAMMOCK ROAD AND NORTH AND SOUTH OF SABAL PALM ROAD IN SECTIONS 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24 AND 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, AND SECTIONS 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 84 -26 FOR SWAMP BUGGY GROUNDS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Dwight Nadeau of RWA, Inc., Robert Mulhere of Mulhere and Associates and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Page 1 of BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 658 of 6526 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24 and 25, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, and Sections 19 and 30, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the Agricultural (A), Agricultural- Special Treatment Overlay (A -ST) and PUD zoning district (Swamp Buggy Days PUD) Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for the 2,262 +/- acre project to be known as the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, to allow a maximum of 327,500 square feet of gross retail commercial floor area; 70,000 gross square feet of professional and medical office space; 135 hotel rooms; 140,000 gross square feet of business park or education facility; continuation of existing "swamp buggy" attraction and "Junior Deputy" passive recreation; and a maximum of 1,760 residential dwelling units in accordance with the Hacienda Lakes MPUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "G" and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004 -41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is /are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Ordinance No. 84 -26, the Swamp Buggy PUD, is hereby repealed. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super- majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 25`h day of October, 2011. ATTEST: D WICcI (CLERK t. By: PU DZ- 2006 -Ak -16 i 4-6'-- BCC Approved 10/25/11 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Page 2 of 3 FRED W. COYLE, Ch&rinan Page 659 of 6526 Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: i ', ,4- - - 0((2 Heidi Ashton -Cicko Assistant County Attorney Section Chief, Land Use /Transportation Attachments: Exhibit A – Permitted Uses Exhibit B – Development Standards Exhibit C – Master Plan Exhibit D – Legal Description Exhibit E - List of Requested Deviations Exhibit F - List of Owner Commitments Exhibit G – Master Use and Conversion List CP\ ] 0- CPS - 01024\ 118 This ordinance s! ,,' with Secretary of ., ll3i?t day of and acknowledgeme pf that filinga received ti,isi day of py- - Deputy lerlc Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Page 3 of 3 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 660 of 6526 EXHIBIT A PERMITTED USES PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS TRACT TYPE UNITS. ACREAGE+ TRACT "R" RESIDENTIAL 1,714 447.86 TRACT "R/MU" RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE 25 min.* 38.82 TRACT "BP" BUSINESS PARK 1 35.38 TRACT "C" COMMERCIAL 17 min.* 34.16 TRACT "A" ATTRACTION 1 47.27 TRACT "P" PRESERVE 0 1,544.14 TRACT "PF" PUBLIC FACILITY 0 1.33 TRACT "JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY 2 21.62 TRACT "ROW" PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY 0 72.01 TRACT "S" SCHOOL 0 19.55 Total 1,760 2262.14 Denotes the minimum number of dwelling units that must be constructed in the associated land use tract. Given that Tract C may generate up to 55 residential dwelling units, thirty (30 %) percent of those residential units (17 units) must be constructed in Tract C. Tract R/MU is required by this document to have no less than 25 residential dwelling units constructed within that Tract. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one -third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. GENERAL PERMITTED LAND USES Streets, alleys, water management facilities and structures, utilities and other infrastructure improvements are generally permitted anywhere within this MPUD except for in the P, Preserve Tract. II TRACT "R ". RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 1,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi- family units are permitted in the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi - family, as defined in the LDC. Residential units may be converted to senior housing units or recreational vehicle (RV) units, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion, the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Single family detached dwellings; 2. Zero lot line, detached dwellings; Two - family and duplex dwellings; 4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 1 of 51 Page 661 of 6526 Multi- family dwellings; Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD; 7. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the BZA, by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: I. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing, apartment rental, as well as resale and rental of units within the MPUD in perpetuity (group 6531); Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests; 4. Horse stables and related equestrian facilities to serve the PUD that complement the MPUD's proximity to the Picayune Strand State Forest may be allowed on residential lands lying east of the proposed north /south public roadway, subject to applicable permitting. This private, non - commercial, accessory use is intended for stabling for residents of the PUD. Horse racing, dressage, or horse jumping events open to the public are prohibited; Private stables on single - family lots greater than 43,560 square feet in lot area, on residential lands lying east of the proposed north/south public roadway are permitted to allow one horse for each 21,780 square feet of lot area; 6. Horse trails. III TRACT "RV ": Up to 290 RV units are allowed only if residential units are converted to RV in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, other than the following: Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 2 of 51 Page 662 of 6526 A. Principal Uses: Recreational vehicle parks (Group 7033, recreational vehicle parks only), subject to the criteria contained in Exhibit B, and only in the location depicted on Exhibit C. In no instance shall greater than 290 Recreational Vehicle units be developed in the entire MPUD. Except as provided herein, the RV District shall comply with the Land Development Code (LDC) including Sections 2.03.031 and 5. 5.10. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests; IV TRACT "R/MU ", RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE PERMITTED USES: Up to 1,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi - family units are permitted in the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi - family as defined in the LDC. The residential units may be converted to senior housing units, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion, the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office related land uses are also allowed in this tract, less up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical related office land uses approved by plat or SDP in Tract C. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or uses, or and used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Single family detached dwellings; Zero lot line, detached dwellings; Two - family and duplex dwellings; 4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); Multi - family dwellings; Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 3 of 51 Page 663 of 6526 for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. 7. Drug Stores and Proprietary Stores (Group 5912). If this retail use is developed in the R/MU Tract then the square footage of gross floor area of this retail use shall reduce the square footage of gross floor area of retail uses permitted in Tract C.; 8. Health Services, (Groups 8011 -8049, 8071 -8072, 8082, and 8092 - 8099); 9. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ( "BZA ") by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing; Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests. V TRACT `BP" BUSINESS PARK PERMITTED USES: Up to 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and a hotel of up to 135 rooms capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. However, if owner elects not to build a hotel on Tract C or BP, then the square footage limitation of business park land uses could be exceeded if a hotel conversion to business park of up to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area is used based on the land use conversions in Exhibit B. In place of the business park and hotel land uses, a school may be developed. If a hotel is constructed on Tract C or BP, based on an approved plat or SDP, then the hotel conversion shall terminate. Tract "BP" is located directly north of the Attraction Tract that accommodates the Swamp Buggy land uses and facilities. This acreage is meant to provide for a transition from the Attraction land uses to the Residential Tract and intended land uses further north. This Tract shall be permitted to be developed for either a business park or a school. If the Tract is developed as a school, only those uses permitted in Section XI below shall be allowed. Should the 35.38 acre tract be proposed for development as a business park, no building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Apparel and other finished products (groups 2311- 2399); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 4 of 51 Page 664 of 6526 2. Building construction (groups 1521- 1542); 3. Business services (group 7311); 4. Communications (groups 4812 -4899, including communication towers limited in height to 100 feet); 5. Construction: Special trade contractors (groups 1711- 1799); 6. Depository and non - depository institutions (groups 6081, 6082); 7. Drugs and medicines (groups 2833 - 2836); 8. Eating places (group 5812, not including fast foods, walk -up windows and drive - thru restaurants); 9. Educational services (groups 8221- 8299); 10. Electronics and other electrical equipment manufacturing, indoor only (groups 3612- 3699); 11. Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services (groups 8711- 8748); 12. Food manufacturing (groups 2034, 2038, 2053, 2064, 2066, 2068, 2096, 2098, 2099); 13. Furniture and fixtures manufacturing (groups 2511- 2599); 14. Government offices /buildings (groups 9111 -9222, 9224 -9229, 9311, 9411 -9451, 9511 -9532, 9611- 9661); 15. Health services (groups 8011- 8049); 16. Industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment (groups 3524, 3546, 3571 - 3579); 17. Industrial inorganic chemicals (groups 2833, and 2844); 18. Job training and vocational rehabilitation services (group 8331); 19. Leather and leather products (groups 3131- 3199); 20. Measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks manufacturing (groups 3812- 3873); 21. Medical laboratories and research and rehabilitative centers (groups 8071, 8072, 8092,8093); 22. Miscellaneous manufacturing industries (groups 3911- 3999); 23. Motion picture production (groups 7812- 7819); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 5 of 51 Page 665 of 6526 24. Motor freight transportation and warehousing ( group 4225, mini- and self- storage warehousing only), subject to the following criteria: i. The use of metal roll -up garage doors located on the exterior of the perimeter buildings and walls of buildings which are visible from a public right -of -way is prohibited; and ii. Access to individual units whether direct or non - direct must be from the side of the building that is oriented internally; iii. No building shall exceed 100 feet in length when adjacent to a residential tract within the MPUD; iv. No outdoor storage of any kind is permitted, and v. Storage units shall be utilized for storage purposes only. 25. Printing, publishing and allied industries (groups 2711- 2796); 26. Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products (groups 3021, 3052, 3053); 27. Security/commodity brokers (group 6211); 28. Transportation equipment (groups 3714, 3716, 3732, 3751, 3792, 3799); 29. U.S. Postal Service (group 4311); 30. Wholesale trade durable goods (groups 5021, 5031, 5043 -5049, 5063 -5078, 5091, 5092, 5094 - 5099); 31. Wholesale trade non durable goods (5111 -5153, 5181, 5182, 5191, except that wholesale distribution of chemicals, fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides shall be a minimum of 500 feet from a residential tract within the MPUD, 5192 - 5193); 32. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Limited Principal Uses: The following uses shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the total acreage of the Business Park tract: Business services (7312, 7313, 7319, 7331, 7334 -7336, 7342, 7349, 7352, 7361, no labor pools, 7371 -7384, 7389); 2. Child day care services (group 8351); 3. Depository and non - depository institutions (groups 6021 -6062, 6091, 6099, 6111- 6163); 4. Drug stores (group 5912, limited to drug stores and pharmacies) in conjunction with health service groups and medical laboratories /research /rehabilitative groups; Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 6 of 51 Page 666 of 6526 Hotels (group 7011) up to 135 rooms, capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. Hotel square footage does not reduce the business park square footage cap. If the hotel conversion is applied to Tract BP, then a hotel is not permitted; 6. Membership organizations (group 8611); business associations (group 8621); professional organizations (8631); labor unions and similar labor organizations; 7. Personal services (groups 7215 -7231, 7241); 8. Physical fitness facilities and bowling centers (groups 7991, 7933); 9. Professional offices; insurance agencies (group 6411); insurance carriers (groups 6311 - 6399); real estate (6531, 6541, 6552, 6553); holding and other investment offices (groups 6712- 6799); attorneys (group 8111); 10. Travel agencies (group 4724). C. Uses Accessory to Principal and Limited Uses: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right; 2. One (1) caretaker's residence within Tract BP, Business Park Tract, subject to the following: i. The residence shall be constructed as an integral part of the principal structure and shall be entered from within the principal structure. Exits required to comply with fire code shall be permitted; ii. The caretaker's residence shall be an accessory use and shall be for the exclusive use of the property owner, tenant, or designated employee operating or maintaining the principal structure; iii. Off - street parking shall be as required for a single - family residence. 3. For primary business park uses, retail sales and/or display areas as accessory to the principal uses shall not exceed an area greater than 20 percent of the gross floor area of the permitted principal use and is further subject to retail standards for landscaping, parking and open space. VI TRACT "C" COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail land uses and up to 70,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office uses reduced by medical- related retail use square footages approved by SDP in Tract R/MU and reduced by up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office land use square footages approved by plat or SDP in Tract R/MU. The 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office may be exceeded if the retail land uses are converted to office thereby reducing the retail square footage, not to exceed 25% of the retail land use allocation. Additionally, a hotel of up to 135 rooms and up to 92,000 square feet of gross floor area shall be allowed in Tract C unless a hotel is developed within Tract BP or if the hotel use is converted to BP uses in Tract BP based on an approved plat or SDP. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 7 of 51 Page 667 of 6526 A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 2. Multi - family dwellings; 3. Residential land uses integrated into commercial buildings with residential units located above commercial land uses to create a mixed -use building; 4. Accounting, auditing and bookkeeping services (group 8721); 5. Adjustment and collection services (group 7322); 6. Advertising agencies (group 7311); 7. Advertising — miscellaneous (group 7319); 8. Amusements and recreation services, indoor (groups 7911 -7922, 7991, 7993, 7999, only billiard parlors, bingo parlors, martial arts and yoga instruction, bicycle and golf cart rentals); 9. Apparel and accessory stores with (groups 5611- 5699); 10. Auto and home supply stores (groups 5211 -5261, and 5531); 11. Automotive dealers, not elsewhere classified (group 5599); 12. Automobile parking (group 7521), including garages - automobile parking, parking structures, no towing yards; 13. Automotive repair, services and parking (groups 7513 — 7533, 7536 - 7549); 14. Barber shops (group 7241), except barber schools; 15. Beauty shops (7231), except beauty schools; 16. Boat dealers (5551); 17. Bookkeeping services (8721); 18. Bowling centers, indoor (7933); 19. Building construction — General contractors (groups 1521 — 1542); 20. Building materials, hardware and garden supplies (groups 5211- 5261); 21. Business associations (group 8611); 22. Business consulting services (group 8748); 23. Business credit institutions (groups 6153- 6159); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 8 of 51 Page 668 of 6526 24. Business services (groups 7311 -7353, 7359, except labor contractors, 7371 -7379, 7381 except armored car and dog rental, 7382 -7389 except auctioneering service, automobile recovery, automobile repossession, batik work, bottle exchanges, bronzing, cloth cutting, cosmetic kits, cotton inspection, cotton sampler, drive -away automobile, exhibits - building, filling pressure containers, field warehousing, fire extinguisher, floats- decoration, folding and refolding, gas systems, bottle labeling, liquidation services, metal slitting and shearing, packaging and labeling, patrol of electric transmission or gas lines, press clipping service, repossession service, rug binding, salvaging of damaged merchandise, scrap steel cutting and slitting, shrinking textiles, solvent recovery, sponging textiles, tape slitting, texture designers, textile folding, tobacco sheeting and window trimming service); 25. Cable and other pay television services (group 4841); 26. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent and assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities, and nursing homes. This housing is included in the retail square foot limitation and no greater than 450 senior housing units shall be developed in this entire MPUD; 27. Child day care services (8351); 28. Commercial printing (2752, excluding newspapers); 29. Civic, social and fraternal associations (group 8641); 30. Coin operated amusement devices, indoor (group 7993); 31. Communications (groups 4812 -4841) including communications towers up to specified height, subject to LDC Section 5.05.09; 32. Construction — special trade contractors (groups 1711 — 1793, 1796, 1799); 33. Dance studios, schools and halls (group 7911); 34. Drug stores (group 5912); 35. Depository institutions (groups 6011- 6099); 36. Eating and drinking establishments (group 5812, and group 5813) excluding bottle clubs. Outdoor amplified sound is prohibited; 37. Educational services (groups 8221, 8222, 8243 — 8249); 38. Engineering, accounting, research, management and related services (groups 8711- 8748); 39. Food stores (groups 5411 - 5499); 40. Gasoline service stations (group 5541 subject to LDC requirements); 41. General merchandise stores (groups 5311, 5331 - 5399); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 9 of 51 Page 669 of 6526 42. Glass and glazing work (1793); 43. Health services (groups 8011 -8049, 8051 -8059, 8071 -8072, 8082 and 8092 - 8099); 44. Home furniture, furnishing, and equipment (groups 5712 - 5736); 45. Hotels and motels (groups 7011, 7021, and 7041) only if a hotel is not built in Tract BP and the hotel conversion is not applied to Tract BP; 46. Insurance carriers, agents and brokers (groups 6311 -6399, 6411); 47. Landscape architects, consulting and planning (group 0781); 48. Legal services (group 8111); 49. Libraries (group 8231); 50. Management and public relations services (groups 8741 -8743, 8748); 51. Membership organizations (8611- 8699); 52. Membership sports and recreation clubs, indoor (group 7997); 53. Miscellaneous personal services (7291, 7299, debt counseling only); 54. Miscellaneous repair services (groups 7622 — 7699); 55. Miscellaneous retail (groups 5912 -5963, 5992 - 5999); 56. Motion picture theaters (group 7832); 57. Motorcycle dealers (group 5571); 58. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (group 4225 mini- and self - storage warehousing only); 59. Museums and art galleries (group 8412); 60. Non - depository credit institutions, and loan brokers (groups 6111- 6163); 61. Offices for engineering, architectural, and surveying services (groups 0781, 8711- 8713); 62. Paint, glass and wallpaper stores (5231); 63. Passenger car leasing (group 7515); 64. Passenger car rental (group 7514); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 10 of 51 Page 670 of 6526 65. Personal services (groups 7211, 7212, 7215, 7216 nonindustrial dry cleaning only, 7217, 7219, 7221 -7251, no beauty or barber schools, 7261 except crematories, 7291, 7299, excluding massage parlors, escort services, steam baths, Turkish baths and tattoo parlors); 66. Photographic studios (7221); 67. Physical fitness facilities (7991); 68. Political organizations ( group 8651); 69. Printing, publishing, and allied industries (groups 2711, 2721); 70. Professional membership organizations (group 8621); 71. Public Administration (groups 9111 -9199, 9229, 9311, 9411 -9451, 9511 -9532, 9611- 9661); 72. Public or private parks and playgrounds; 73. Public relations services (group 8743); 74. Radio, television, and consumer electronics stores (group 5731); 75. Radio and television broadcasting stations (groups 4832, and 4833); 76. Real estate (group 6512, 6531- 6552); 77. Record and prerecorded tape stores (group 5735), excluding adult oriented rentals and sales; 78. Recreational vehicle dealers (group 5561); 79. Religious organizations (group 8661); 80. Research, development, and testing services (group 8731- 8734); 81. Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores (group 5261); 82. Security and commodity brokers, dealer, exchanges and services (groups 6211- 6289); 83. Theatrical producers and miscellaneous theatrical services, indoor (groups 7922- 7929); 84. Tour operators (group 4725); 85. Travel agencies (group 4724); 86. United States Postal Service (43 11 except major distribution center); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 1 1 of 51 Page 671 of 6526 87. Veterinary services (groups 0742, 0752 excluding outside kenneling); 88. Videotape rental (7841), excluding adult oriented rental and sales; 89. Vocational schools ( groups 8243 - 8299); 90. Any other commercial use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses and consistent with the purpose and intent statement of the district as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. A. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Parking facilities and signage; 2. Eating/ Picnic Area; 3. One (1) caretaker's residence within the C, Commercial Tract; 4. Child care, outdoor play areas. Where play areas are constructed as an accessory use to a permitted use, the following conditions shall apply: a. A minimum five -foot, six -inch high reinforced fence shall be installed on all sides of the play area which are not open to the principal structure; b. Ingress to and egress from the play area shall be made only from the principal structure, however an emergency exit from the play area shall be provided which does not empty into the principal structure; c. The play equipment shall be set back a minimum distance of five feet from the required fence and from the principal structure. 5. Kiosks, that are small separate structures, often movable and open on one or more sides, used as a newsstand, vending stall, or other conveniences, Individual kiosks shall not to exceed 200 square feet.; VII TRACT "A" ATTRACTION PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Swamp Buggy" race track (group 7948, swamp buggy track only); 2. County fair and similar expositions, including circuses, carnivals, and other recreation/entertainment activities; Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 12 of 51 Page 672 of 6526 3. Exhibition hall /community center; 4. Amateur soccer, softball, lacrosse, volleyball, football, and similar outdoor recreational sports and activities and shall not be limited in the number of occurrences; 5. Indoor target ranges, including archery; 6. Stock car, monster trucks, and motorized vehicle race track (group 7948, motorized vehicle race track only); 7. Motocross (including bicycle and motorcycle) race course (group 7948, motocross race course only); 8. Stadium, training, and practice facilities for professional baseball (group 7941). This use is allowed only if a Notice of Proposed Change or Substantial Deviation Application for Development Approval is processed in accordance with Section 380.06, F.S., or any successor statute, and the Hacienda Lakes DRI is amended. If state law changes such that DRI review or other state review is no longer required then this provision shall terminate; 9. Administrative offices and supportive service facilities; 10. Any other use or structure that is comparable in nature to the foregoing and that is approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Any accessory uses and structures that are incidental to and customarily associated with those uses permitted herein; 2. Onsite water management, utility, and service facilities; 3. Signs as permitted or required by the applicable Collier County Land Development Code at the time of application for construction permits; 4. Residential facilities (one (1) residential unit within the A, Attraction Tract) for housing of security personnel or caretakers whose work requires residence on the property; 5. Concessions, ticketing, bleachers, and other spectator- related facilities; 6. Picnicking and playground areas, as well as areas for camping that may be utilized only three days prior to, during, and three days after a major event weekend. C. Conditional Uses: 1. Fuel storage and related facilities. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 13 of 51 Page 673 of 6526 VIII TRACT "P" PRESERVE PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses 1. Upland preserves; 2. Wetland preserves; B Accessory Uses and Structures Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, horse trails, shelters, viewing platforms, educational signs, and information kiosks; 2. Water management structures; 3. Archaeological sites and associated research of said sites. IX TRACT "PF" PUBLIC FACILITY PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses 1. Public safety facilities intended to provide emergency medical, ground transportation services. B. Accessory Uses Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Parking facilities and signage; 2. Administrative offices and support service facilities; 3. Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures. X TRACT "JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 14 of 51 Page 674 of 6526 A. Principal Uses: 1. Open space and outdoor recreational uses, including, but not limited to hiking, biking, fishing, boating, camping, picnicking and nature trails; 2. Sporting and recreational camps; 3. Caretaker's residence, limited to two for the JD, Junior Deputy Tract. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, shelters, pavilions, viewing piers, viewing platforms, educational signs, kiosks, and docks or platforms for launching and mooring or storage of non- motorized vessels utilizing movable storage racks; 2. Covered camping pavilion(s) (i.e.: concrete, or similar hard surface, that is roofed, and may, or may not be enclosed with screen/plastic sheeting, or walls), which may include kitchen/cooking facilities, office and restroom facilities; 3. Passive parks and passive recreational uses; 4. Pervious roads, driveways, and pervious and /or impervious parking facilities; 5. Project identification and directional signage; 6. Water management structures; 7. Restrooms /bath houses; 8. Roofed or unroofed storage for maintenance and recreational equipment; 9. Fencing and security gates, which may include barbed wire; 10. Archery and air rifle range(s). XI TRACT "S" SCHOOLS PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Schools, public or private, including Educational Services (Group 82). Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 15 of 51 Page 675 of 6526 B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Educational facilities; 2. Parking facilities and signage; Administrative offices and support service facilities; Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures; Recreational facilities. XII SIGNS: A. Seven, on- premise, ground signs shall be permitted on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways as depicted and labeled "Boundary Marker" on Sheets 3 and 4 of the MPUD Master Plan Set. These ground signs shall be allowed in addition to other signage allowed by Section 5.06.00 of the LDC. Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3). B. One real estate sign shall be permitted in the Commercial Tract for the purposes of marketing residential products within the MPUD. This additional real estate signage may be utilized by any of the developers of the residential communities within the MPUD (See Exhibit E, Deviation #6). C. The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain until new signage can be permitted in Tract C. (See Exhibit E, Deviation #7) Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 16 of 51 Page 676 of 6526 EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GENERAL: Development of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. Conversion of residential land use types are provided for below which may be utilized to apportion units to senior housing or recreational vehicle units relative to the mix of residential land uses within this MPUD and their relation to public facility impacts. Table I below, sets forth the development standards for residential land uses within the MPUD, including residential land uses that are required to be developed in Tracts C and R/MU. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Figures 1 thru 7 generally depict typical development standards for the various residential products. Table II below, sets forth the development standards for commercial land uses, senior housing units, and public facility land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table III below, sets forth the development standards for the business park land uses and school land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table IV below, sets forth the development standards for the Attraction land uses and Junior Deputy passive recreation land uses within the MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. The facilities and improvements that are depicted on Exhibit C, the MPUD Master Plan shall be considered conceptual in nature. The design, location, and configuration of land improvements shall be defined at either site development plan, or construction plans and plat approval(s). Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and /or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. MAXIMUM DENSITY AND INTENSITY: Residential Density: This MPUD shall be limited to 1,760 residential dwelling units (du) that equates to a density of 0.78 dwelling units per gross acre. The 1,760 residential units are either single- or multi - family units as defined in the LDC. No more than 1,232 multi - family units may be constructed in the entire PUD. Caretakers residences shall be deducted from the 1,760 unit allocation. A minimum of 25 residential units shall be constructed in the R/MU Tract, and a minimum of 17 residential units shall be constructed in Tract C. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one -third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 17 of 51 Page 677 of 6526 LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS Residential Density: 1.0 residential unit equates to 2. 73 Recreational Vehicle units /spaces (not to exceed 290 RV units in the entire PUD), or 4 Senior Housing Units (not to exceed 450 Senior Housing Units in the entire PUD). Up to 1,232 of the total 1,760 residential units may be multi - family as defined in the Land Development Code. Commercial Intensity: Hacienda Lakes is intended to be developed with a mixture of commercial land uses that include 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail uses, 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office uses, 20,000 square feet of gross floor area of general office uses, 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and 135 hotel rooms. In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 PM Peak Hour Trips. Such maximum trip generation cap was developed based on 327,500 gross square feet of retail land uses, 50,000 gross square feet of medical office land uses, 20,000 gross square feet of general office land uses, 140,000 gross square feet of business park land uses, a primary school with a contemplated enrollment of 919 students, 135 hotel rooms, not to exceed 92,000 gross square feet, 704 single- family units, and 1,056 multi - family units. However, the hotel shall not count against the 140,000 square foot cap associated with the business park. Should the BP Tract not be developed as a business park but be developed as a school facility (excluding Collier County School District public schools), such facility shall not exceed the maximum 140,000 gross square feet allowed in that Tract. The developer shall be allowed to convert retail land uses to office land uses at a one to one (1:1) ratio, not to exceed 25% of the retail land use allocation, provided only if the converted use is an allowed use in the tract. The developer shall also be allowed to wholly convert the hotel development opportunity of 135 rooms not to exceed 92,000 square feet to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses. All existing land uses and facilities in the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts shall not count against the overall trip and land use cap. Senior Housing Intensity: The intensity of any senior housing project shall have a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.60. The 1,760 dwelling unit cap is only intended to limit the number of single family and multi- family residential units, as those units are defined in the Land Development Code. The development may include in excess of 1,760 residential units if some are developed as senior housing units. With the exception of senior housing development in the C, Commercial Tract, senior housing units shall be developed through the conversion of residential land uses. Residential units shall be allowed for conversion to senior housing units based on the Land Use Conversion Factors, above. However, 1 single - family dwelling unit equates to 1 single - family style independent living units. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. Total Project Intensity: In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 pm Peak Hour Trips. Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing Senior housing may be composed of one or more types of care/housing facilities. These care/housing types are limited to independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing units, each of which can have varying operational characteristics. The following characteristics of senior housing care units distinguish them from residential land uses, and all of the characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a senior housing care unit: Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 18 of 51 Page 678 of 6526 The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older; There shall be on -site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on -site, or catered; Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents needs, including but not limited to medical office visits; There shall be an onsite manager /activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents. Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency; Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. Recreational Vehicle Park Criteria Any RV Park may be located in one location as generally depicted on Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan. This area shall be developed either with an RV Park or residential land uses, and not be a combination of both. The RV Park shall be limited to Class A motorcoaches only. In no instance shall greater than 290 Recreational Vehicle units be developed in the entire MPUD. The density of the RV park shall not exceed 12 RV units for each acre of the development parcel [not less than 20 acres]. The Lord's way shall be the principal access to Collier Boulevard (CR -951). A 25 foot Type C landscape buffer shall be located between any RV land use and adjoining residentially zoned or developed parcel. Sign Development Standards Boundary Markers shall be no greater than 15 feet in height, and shall not exceed 64 square feet of sign content area (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3). Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development. Any signage proposed for identifying the on -site Swamp Buggy Attraction land use in the Commercial Tract may be illuminated and manually changeable so the traveling public may learn of upcoming events in the Attraction Tract. Any land uses permitted within the boundaries of the MPUD shall be considered on -site for the purposes of providing for signage within the Commercial Tract. Site Development, or Plat Approval At the time of each development order application subsequent to rezone approval, the developer or its successors and assigns shall submit a list of previously approved land uses (approved via site development plan, or plat), and the trips, commercial square footage and residential units consumed to date. Developer shall also provide to County a copy of its master list of land uses and converted uses for this PUD with each SDP or plat application in the form attached as Exhibit G. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 19 of 51 Page 679 of 6526 TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SETBACK SINGLE ZERO LOT TWO TOWNHOUSE MULTI- CLUB RECREAT- FAMILY LINE FAMILY/ FAMILY HOUSE/ IONAL DETACHED DUPLEX DWELLINGS REC- VEHICLE REATION PARKS BLDGS PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES Minimum Lot Area 4,800 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF per 1,800 SF per lot 1 acre 800 SF per lot 10,000 SF space/unit Minimum Lot Width 40' 35' 35' per lot 18'per lot or 150' 35' unit N/A 15' or '/2 BH, 15' or 1/2 BH, 15' or 1/2 BH, 15' or % BH, 15' or '/2 BH, 15' or 1/2 BH, 15' Minimum Distance From whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is MPUD Boundary greater. greater. greater. greater. greater. greater. 20', or 15' 20', or 15' 20', or 15' 20' 20' or '/2 BH, 10' with side with side with side whichever is Front Yard Setback load garages load garages load garages greater. N/A Side Yard 6' 0' or 10' 0' or 6 0' or 6' 1/1 BH 5' N/A Rear Yard 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' or '/2 BH, 8' whichever is greater N/A From Preserve 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25 Maximum Zoned Height 35' 35' 35' 45' 75' 40' 30' Maximum Actual Height 42' 42' 42' 50' 85' 50' 35' Floor Area Minimum SF 1200 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 900 SF 750 SF N/A N/A Minimum Distance 15' or 1/2 10' Between 12' 10' 12' 12' Yz SBH SBH, Principal Structures whichever is greater ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Front SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Side SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Rear 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 10' SPS From Preserve 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' Minimum Distance 10' Between Accessory Structures on same lot 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' Minimum Distance 0' OR 10' Between Accessory and Principle Structures on same lot 0' or 10' 0' or10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' Maximum Zoned Height SPS SPS SPS 35' SPS SPS Maximum Actual Height SPSLSPSSPSSPS35' SPS Minimum Distance From 15' or'' /2 BH 15' or' /2 BH 15' or'' /2 BH 15' or'' /] BH 15' or %: BH 15' or'' /2 BH MPUD Boundary" whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is reater reater reater eater eater eater SPS: Same as Principal Structure LL: Lot Line BOC: Back Of Curb Paseo: A pedestrian only access way to and from residences. N /A: Not Applicable BH: Zoned Building Height SBH: Sum of Building Heights Principal and Accessory Uses shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 20 of 51 Page 680 of 6526 General application of setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right -of -way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right -of -way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non - platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. Notes: 1) Structures adjacent to a lake may have no setback from the lake maintenance easement. 2) Entrance features (i.e.: guard house, clock towers and colonnades) are limited in height to no greater than 35 feet in actual height. 3) Two or three story multi - family structures may have terraced setbacks. Terraced setbacks shall be measured from the ground floor exterior wall, as long as a minimum 15 -foot building wall setback is provided as depicted in Figure 1 below. 4) For all residential units, garages shall be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk closest to the garage, except for side loaded garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth must be provided perpendicular to the sidewalk to prevent vehicles being parked across a portion, or all of the referenced sidewalk. 5) No residential buildings greater than 50 feet in actual height shall be permitted west of the Florida Power and Light easement. PPo Figure 1 Terraced Setbacks Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 21 of 51 Page 681 of 6526 PRESERVE ) 5' E STRUCTURE SETBACK 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY - STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 1 FROM PRESERVE I 1 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK ACC SM. . FROM PRESERVE 1 1 i 1 8' MIN. 12' MIN 6' MIN. 6' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL 1 1 STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 PRINCIPAL 1 23' MIN. STRUCTURE 1 I TYP.) I I FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL I 15' i FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 MIN. 20' MIN.- 23' MIN. I STRUCTURE SETBACK ROW L 5' SIDEWALK- - BACK OF CURB 10' MIN. CENTERLINE i - ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 2 Detached Single - Family Units i PRESERVE 5' MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY 01-1-1 STRUCTURE SETBACK 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY - -- -- r--- ---- - - -- - STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 FROM PRESERVE I 1 I 1 1 I 1 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL I ACC. STR. STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE I 1 1 I 1 I I 10' MIN. 10' MIN, 10' MIN. _O' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL 1 1 1 1 STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 PRINCIPAL I 1 23' MIN. STRUCTURE 1 I I I 1 TYP-) 1 I 1 I FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL I I I I T AKSTRUCTURESETBACK1I120' 213' I IRPRI SETBAC 15, MIN. MI . IROW MIL 5' SIDEWALK BACK OF CURB 10' MIN. CENTERLINE i - ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 3 Detached Single- Family /Zero Lot Line Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 22 of 51 Page 682 of 6526 PRESERVE 1, 5' MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY i/`/ i!16C URE SMACK 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY ---- -- --- - -I -- ---- --- STRUCTURE SETBACK I I I 1 1 FROM PRESERVE I I i I 1 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL I I I STRUCTURE SETBACK STRUCTURE SETBACK I ACC. STR I ACC. STR FROM PRESERVE I I 1 I I I i I I 1 NO SIDE YARD REQUIRED FOR ATTACHED PRINCIPAL UNITS MIN. 12' MIN. i 1 1 PRINCIPAL I STRUCTURE 6' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL 23' MIN. I I (TYP) STRUCTURE SETBACK FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL I I STRUCTURE SETBACK i I 15' MIN. ROW 5' SIDEWALK — BACK OF CURB 10' MIN. CENTERUNE — --" — ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE I I1.77 N I I NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 4 Duplex and Two - Family Units MOW STIRUCTURE SETBACK 5' Sinn BACK OF CURB— CENTERLINE— I ACC. STIR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 5 Attached Single- Family and Townhouse Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 23 of 51 PRESERVE 1 5' MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY i STRUCTURE SETBACK 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK I I I 1 STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE I I I I I I I I SIDE FOR 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL I I ATTACHEDYPRIINC PALI UNITS STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE 12' 1 1 MIN. PRI IPA ST; RE PRINCIPAL J. STRUCTURErEE i MOW STIRUCTURE SETBACK 5' Sinn BACK OF CURB— CENTERLINE— I ACC. STIR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 5 Attached Single- Family and Townhouse Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 23 of 51 ACC. STIR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 5 Attached Single- Family and Townhouse Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 23 of 51 Page 683 of 6526 PRESERVE TRACT UNE- 10 FOOT MINIMUM .../ J.J J _ _ — \_ _ ACCESSORY ( SE FROM PRESERVE — — — _ _ — _ _ -- — — 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE 1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT MDU M—} SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK 7RACT LINEN 5' Sic BACK OF ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 6 Multi- Family Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 SETBACK 15' MIN. REAR YAM PRINCIPAL T7 STRUCTURESETBACK OF THE BUI DM Page 24 of 51 Page 684 of 6526 TABLE II COMMERCIAL, INCLUDING MIXED USE BUILDINGS, PUBLIC FACILITY, AND SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM LOT BOUNDARY) 25 FEET OR %: THE BUILDING HEIGHT, WHICHEVER IS GREATER * ** 10 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD BOUNDARIES * * ** 25 FEET 10 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FT. OR %: THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS* 10 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET * * * ** 25 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 60 FEET * * * ** 30 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — COMMERCIAL MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — SENIOR HOUSING MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — PUBLIC FACILITY 600 SQUARE FEET ** 350 SQUARE FEET 1,500 SQUARE FEET N/A N/A N/A MIN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT 600 SQUARE FEET ** 80 SQUARE FEET ** Whichever is greater Not applicable to kiosks General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right -of -way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right -of -way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non - platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. Principal and Accessory Structures shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer. except that a hotel, destination resort, senior housing or mixed use building may be up to 75 feet in zoned height and 85 feet in actual height. Note: Any independent living unit proposed for development in a single - family type of configuration shall comply with the development standards for single- family land uses set forth in Table I. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 25 of 51 Page 685 of 6526 TABLE III BUSINESS PARK AND SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 8,000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 80 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT 50 FEET * ** 10 FEET BOUNDARY) — BUSINESS PARK MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT BOUNDARY) — SCHOOL 50 FEET * ** 25 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD N/A N/A BOUNDARIES PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN 15 FT. OR %: THE SUM OF 10 FEET STRUCTURES - BUSINESS PARK BUILDING HEIGHTS MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN or 18 FEET 10 FEET STRUCTURES- SCHOOL MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT - BUSINESS PARK 35 FEET 35 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT - SCHOOL 50 FEET 50 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT — BUSINESS PARK 50 FEET 35 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT - SCHOOL 60 FEET 60 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — BUSINESS PARK 1000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — SCHOOL or 350 SQUARE FEET 35 SQUARE FEET MIN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT BUSINESS PARK 500 SQUARE FEET 80 SQUARE FEET SCHOOL N/A N/A Whichever is greater General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right -of -way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right -of -way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non - platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. The Lord's Way Access Improvements: In the event that Tract BP is developed as a business park, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer with roadway facilities as depicted by LDC Appendix B -4, a Commercial/Industrial typical roadway section, prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for a business park land use. In the event that Tract BP is developed as an educational facility, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer as depicted by LDC Appendix B -3, a Local Street typical roadway section. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 26 of 51 Page 686 of 6526 TABLE IV ATTRACTION AND JUNIOR DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 1 ACRE N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT BOUNDARY) 20 FEET, PLUS 1 FOOT FOR EACH 2 FEET OF BLDG. HT. OVER 50 FEET 20 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD BOUNDARIES 25 FEET 20 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FT. OR %Z THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS* 10 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET 50 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 75 FEET 75 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1000 SQUARE FEET ** N/A Whichever is greater Not applicable to modular units, trailers, towers, camping pavilion, and similar structures to support the utilization of the attraction facilities, which have no minimum floor area limitations Parking for Junior Deputy: Required parking for the JD designated areas of the MPUD shall be calculated at the rate of one parking space for each 1000 square feet of covered camping pavilion. Junior Deputy Target Orientation: Archery and air rifle ranges shall be oriented for a line of fire only to the east, or north, and shall have a back stop that shall be comprised of absorbing materials such as an earthen berm, hay bales, or similar treatments, each installed according to industry standards, to prohibit projectiles from exiting the range area. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 27 of 51 Page 687 of 6526 og' r s9mmoDgZFZ. IT =m500Zf9iemso Exhibit C7F L 55 9 j s o fr lit i3 M N uM M N M n ev ° °sue ply lip S A,X a 54 sass o a I €€ InR(H 2flln Cf 4. 5r X1.11E HAciE rew[tT. CIENDA LAKES OFNAPLES, LLC. HACIENDA LAKES mc c OVERALL MPUD/DRI CONSUL IN QvdHo eaa r, MPUD/DRI i I& ..a sus" oM.v MASTER PLAN .,o ....°,....:m.,..>,. Page 688 of 6526 EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER, LYING IN SECTION 11 THROUGH 14 AND 23 THROUGH 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST AND SECTION 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING FURTHER BOUND AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.89 °10'42 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2835.68 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89 01 I'14 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2906.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S.89 009'39 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2693.18 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89 °I 1'01 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2693.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00 °13'35 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2636.34 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00 014'15 "W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 2637.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.87 °07'13 "E. ALONG A LINE COMMON TO SAID SECTION 24 AND 25 FOR 1704.07 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.01 °08'02 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 684.58 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 012'28 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 340.01 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.01 °04'11 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2052.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °28'21 "W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2025.64 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 23 AND 24; THENCE S.89 °01'58 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 1328.51 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01 0 18'52 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 679.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.89 022'00 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 663.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01 ° 14'38 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 675.75 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S.89 °01'58 "W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 664.25 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE S.89 °01'58 "W. ALONG SAID LINE FOR 627.16 FEET; THENCE N.01 °01'15 "E. FOR 1699.99 FEET; THENCE S.89 °01'58 "W. FOR 701.42 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF A 170 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE S.01 °01'15 "W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 68.31 FEET; THENCE S.89 °01'58 "W. FOR 1232.97 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY; THENCE N.00 °51'54 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 956.27 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 30.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR) THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °37'31 "E. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1237.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.01 °01'15 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 30.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °37'31 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1337.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.00 °48'00 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2683.32 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 °31'38 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 334.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °48'11 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1341.38 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °28'42 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 1002.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.00 °48'45 "E. ALONG SAID WEST Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 29 of 51 Page 689 of 6526 AND EAST LINE FOR 335.13 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE 5. 87 °27'58 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1236.32 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183; THENCE N.00 °49'30 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 1004.62 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE N.00 050'27 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 344.07 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N.87 °28'56 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1235. 95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE 5.00 °49'13 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 342.92 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °25'45 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1336.32 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE CONTINUE N.87 °25'45 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 668.16 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 °47'37 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.11 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °27'14 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 668.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 047'14 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °28'42 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 1336.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE N.87 °30'06 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1328.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °38'50 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.26 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N.00 °4 1'44 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2707.07 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °40'34 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1321.29 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °36'23 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2701.30 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION SAID POINT BEING THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S.87 °26'11 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 662.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 °35' 02 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345. 93 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 030'06 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 664.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 038'50 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °32'03 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °35'02 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 °33'59 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.81 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 038'51 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 1345.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE 5.87 °37'27 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 667.27 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 °42'40 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87 °40'54 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2006.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE 5.00 °56'29 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1368.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °34'58 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1343.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °4 1'32 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1365.31 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °41'38 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER FOR 1337.58 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 026'32 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 1703.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 30 of 51 Page 690 of 6526 NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE 5.87 033'18 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 672.60 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 °34'02 "W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 1022.89 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °28'21 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 674.89 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE S.88 °12'42 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 3093.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.03 °39'20 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2676.74 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.88 °56'10 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2940.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE 5.87 007'20 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 FOR 2726.50 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °07'13 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 807.16 FEET; THENCE S.03 °18'31 "E. FOR 1451.00 FEET; THENCE N.88 056'54 "E. FOR 1582.00 FEET; THENCE 5.00 °31'35 "E. FOR 1130.61 FEET; THENCE S.89 °15'59 "E. FOR 1823.18 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.89 °57'58 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2200.53 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 037'14 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 034'43 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 365.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.00 041'48 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 023'00 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 364.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 °22'35 "E. FOR 710.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.00 °52'45 "E. FOR 1334.78 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89 046'12 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 049'34 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF FOR 668.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 °57'58 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2497.82 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01 ° 12'08 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FOR 2640.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 101,084,043 SQUARE FEET OR 2,320.6 ACRES +/- LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS: PARCEL "A" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.00 °59' 10 "W. FOR 1329.95 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89 022'35 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 355.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °55' 57 "E. FOR 1332.36 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.89 °46'12 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 473,270 SQUARE FEET OR 10.9 ACRES +/- PARCEL "B" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTEROF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87 °28'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1349.77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °40'10 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1361.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 017'48 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1356.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 056'29 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 31 of 51 Page 691 of 6526 682.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 °23'02 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 338.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01 000'20 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 683.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °28'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 337.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2,072,100 SQUARE FEET OR 47.6 ACRES +/- Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 32 of 51 Page 692 of 6526 EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.0l.B, related to streets in subdivisions, that requires subdivisions to have platted road rights -of -way for streets, to allow private streets to be provided by separate access easements rather than platted road rights -of way. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c that limits the number of model homes, to allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the various phases or communities within the project. The number of model homes may exceed five for each phase or community within the project, but shall not exceed a total of 60 models for the entire MPUD development. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 to allow "boundary marker" signage on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways that provide access to the MPUD. The sign content area for "boundary markers" to be located in the Residential Tract R may be 15 feet in height rather than 8 feet in height as limited in LDC Subsection 5.06.02B.6.b. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2. that limits fence or wall heights to six (6') feet, to allow fences or walls to be no greater than eight (8') feet throughout the development. Where associated with existing or future public roadways, or Tract A, a 20 foot tall visual screen may be installed as a wall, berm, or wall /berm combination. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.02.13 G., and 4.06.02 C.5., that requires a six foot tall opaque architecturally finished masonry wall, or berm, or combination thereof be provided around the boundaries of a business park. Buffering around the proposed Business Park Tract would be as required by the entirety of the referenced sections of the LDC, but the six foot wall, or berm, or combination thereof will not be required on the Business Park Tract along the frontage of Lord's Way. Deviation #6 seeks to allow one real estate sign in addition to the real estate signage permitted in LDC Section 5.06.02 B.2., that would be erected off -site from the Residential Tract, in the Commercial Tract. Deviation #7 The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain in the present location until: the sign is relocated to allow the construction of the bridge to extend Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and /or a new sign can be permitted in Tract C. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1. that limits care unit Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 0.45, to allow a care unit FAR of 0.60. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 33 of 51 Page 693 of 6526 EXHIBIT F LIST OF OWNER COMMITMENTS For the purposes of this PUD, the owner commitments set forth below are applicable to Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, its successors, and/or assigns. The owner commitments below shall not be enforceable upon Swamp Buggy Days, Inc., nor Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc. LEGAL A. Access to Parcel "A ", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via a new roadway easement from Owner that shall be recorded in the public records of Collier County, and shall run in a north -south direction from the existing thirty-foot roadway easement recorded in O.R. Book 857, Page 1800. This easement shall be recorded within 90 -days of approval of this PUD. B. Access to Parcel "B ", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via the existing roadway and ingress /egress easements recorded in O.R. Book 271, Page 505, O.R. Book 622, Page 1609, O.R. Book 245, Page 124, and O.R. Book 287, Page 18. C. No existing public access /roadway easements shall be vacated to preclude access to off -site private and public lands without providing replacement access easements. This new roadway easement shall be equivalent to the existing easement and shall be recorded concurrently with the vacation. II ENVIRONMENTAL A. Native vegetation shall be preserved in this MPUD in accordance with the table below: Hacienda Lakes Native Preserve Summary Description Total Urban ac Rural ac Project Area 2262.14 625.07 1637.07 On -Site Native Vegetation 1721.97 295.38 1426.59 Less the Native Veg Within Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. 2.02 2.02 0.00 Less the Native Veg Within The Lords Way Ext. 0.42 0.42 0.00 Less the Native Veg Within the Benfield Road Corridor 12.91 5.01 7.90 Less the Native Veg Within Archaeological Preserves 6.07 1.06 5.02 Native Vegetation For Requirement Calculations 1700.54 286.87 1413.67 Percentage for required Native Preserve 25% Required Native Vegetation* 921.09 71. 71 849.38 Preserved Native Vegetation ** 1395.35 40.81 1352.57 Compensating Native Preserve 2x URF Deficit)" 61.80 Total Preserve Area 1544.14 53.06 1491.08 Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 34 of 51 Page 694 of 6526 Native Preserve Requirement (LDC Subsection 2.05.02.B.2.g.ii.) of 90% within the RFMUD Sending Lands exceeds 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands. Therefore, over 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands shall be the required Rural native vegetation area. Compliance with LDC Subsection 3.05.07 H.1.a., requires native vegetation planting enhancement of a minimum of 12.24 acres of the project's URF Subdistrict Preserve Tract. Compliance with 100% of the native vegetation preservation requirement shall be achieved through preserving RFMUD project native vegetation in an amount two times the deficient native vegetation preserve acreage in the URF Subdistrict project lands as is provided for through the adopted GMP amendment. B. A Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring plan is to be submitted once approved from SFWMD, for County review. C. The MPUD shall be developed in accordance with the Wildlife Habitat Management Plan accepted by Collier County as contained in the Environmental Impact Statement. D. An updated listed species survey for the future development areas shall be submitted prior to the next development order approval. E. Installation of the Sabal Palm Road culvert crossings and spreader swales shall occur prior to the first preliminary acceptance. III ENGINEERING A. A SFWMD ROW permit will be required for widening the bridge at Rattlesnake Hammock/951 over the Henderson Creek Canal. IV ARCHAEOLOGICAL and HISTORIC RESOURCES A. The five archaeological sites identified within the Hacienda Lakes parcel are denoted AP, Archaeological Preserve on Sheets 3 -12 in the MPUD Master Plan Set. These sites must remain undeveloped. A public access easement around the archaeological sites for potential digs and further study has been provided. Disturbance to these five protected archaeological sites may only occur with County approval and approval of the State Division of Historical Resources, and any disturbance shall only be permitted under the direct supervision of a qualified archaeologist. B. Historical /archeological areas are not used to meet preserve requirements because if an archaeological dig is required, then native vegetation would have to be removed. V EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES A. In order to mitigate for the project impacts and demand on Emergency Medical Services EMS), the developer shall provide a one acre parcel to Collier County. This public facility site is identified as "PF" on the MPUD Master Plan (Exhibit Q. The dedication of the one acre site shall be by deed to Collier County and is subject to an Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit based on the fair market value of the donated property. The valuation of the one acre site dedication has been determined to be $30,000 per acre, for the purposes of the Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit, and the conveyance shall occur no later than at the time the 500`h residential unit is included in a development order request (site development plan, or plat), subsequent to the adoption of the DRI Development Order. If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances described in this paragraph, then Owner shall be entitled to an EMS impact fee credit for the value of the Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 35 of 51 Page 695 of 6526 mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. The total cost of State and Federal mitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. In lieu of EMS impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County-owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the EMS impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this paragraph. VI TRANSPORTATION For the purposes of the following commitments, it must be understood that the property was divided into three main areas: North area being north of The Lord's Way extension; South area being south of Rattlesnake Hammock Road plus School; Benfield Road Improvements. The South area commitments shall be constructed in a sequential manner. However, the rest of the commitments are not sequential and can be accomplished in no specific order. Similarly, the three areas identified above are not required to be developed in a sequential manner. SOUTH AREA I. The Owner shall construct (here forward to mean "constructed to meet minimum County requirements for acceptance "), at its sole expense without road impact fee credits, the initial two lanes (south side) of Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement (approximately 0.25 miles). In addition, the Owner shall construct the Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below and to improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below. Upon completion (here forward to mean "completed construction to County minimum requirements, and reserved for future conveyance to the County at the County's request. ") of all of such improvements, the Owner shall be allowed to develop up to 327,500 square feet of Retail Land Uses, or Residential Pod A, or some combination of the two land uses. However, the total number of gross trips to be generated by this portion of development shall not exceed 1,409 PM peak hour trips. In the event that Residential Pod A is developed, access to Pod A will be either an internal private roadway or via an extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road to the entrance of Pod A. These improvements and the areas allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 1, below. All of these improvements are site related improvements. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 36 of 51 Page 696 of 6526 Figure 1— Hacienda Lakes DRI - Commitment I II. The Owner shall construct, at its own expense and without road impact fee credits, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from Florida Power Line Easement to the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds (approximately 0.25 miles) and improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the final geometry as shown is Figure 2, below. These improvements are site related improvements. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 20,000 Square Feet of General Office, and; 50,000 Square Feet of Medical Office, and; 135 Room Hotel, and; Remaining portion of the 327,500 Square Feet of Retail (if applicable pursuant to Commitment I), and; Remaining portion of Residential Pod A (if applicable pursuant to Commitment 1), and; Required residential uses within Activity Center land use; Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 37 of 51 Page 697 of 6526 These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 2, below. Fiture 2 — Hacienda Lakes DRi - Commkment 11 III. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds to the future Benfield Road as a two lane road, including construction of the Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension at Benfield Road intersection. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 919 Student Elementary School, and; Residential Pod B. Since only a portion of the capacity to be provided by this two lane section will be consumed by the Hacienda Lakes PUD, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits equal to 50% of the cost of this improvement. The cost of this improvement will be determined at the time Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 38 of 51 Page 698 of 6526 of construction, and shall include the fair market value of the land or easement when the Owner conveys the road right of way to the County, free and clear of liens and encumbrances. Fair market value has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 3, below. Fifty percent (50 %) of the cost of this improvement is deemed a site - related improvement. Flaure 3 — Hacienda Lakes DRI - Commitment 111 NORTH AREA IV. With no improvement other than a bridge to be constructed by the Owner, at its sole cost and without road impact fee credit, over the water canal that runs parallel to C.R.951 at the northern project site access, the Owner shall be allowed to develop Residential Pod C (not to exceed 300 PM peak hour trips at the connection to C.R.951). This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 4, below. At no time will the County accept ownership of this bridge. This improvement is a site related improvement. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 39 of 51 Page 699 of 6526 Figure 4 — Hacienda lakes SRI - Commitment IV rl__„, Residential Pod C I 6 S 1%_1 Florida Power Line Easement Rattlesnake 7 Residential Residential Pod B 17, 14PodA \ I L Existing Lanes/Turn Lanes — — L Lanes/Turn Lanes to be Constructed /Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed j_ Area Previously Developed Area to be Developed V. The Owner shall, at its sole expense and without road impact fee credits, complete the reconstruction of The Lord's Way from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement and construct the extension of The Lord's Way from Florida Power Line Easement to the west entrance to the Business Park with a two lane undivided cross section. In addition, when the Collier Boulevard at The Lord's Way intersection is signalized upon meeting warrants, the cost of the signalization of this intersection will be shared proportionately among the Owner and other developments located in the area (east and west of C.R.951) and at no cost to Collier County and without road impact fee credits. These improvements are site - related improvements. Upon completion of such road improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Business Park, and; Residential Pod D. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 40 of 51 Page 700 of 6526 These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 5, below. Residential Pod C Florida Power Une Easement Residential" x; Pod r ttt ry Residential r. Pod A 1mid to Existing Lanes/Turn lanes Lanes/Turn Lanes to be Constructed /Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed Area Previously Developed Area to be Developed Residential Pod B k \ c When the DRI has received certificates of occupancy for 66 percent of the total commercial and residential development authorized by the DRI, Collier County will perform an evaluation and inform the Owner if it is necessary to convey road right of way to the County for the section of The Lord's Way Extension from the west entrance to the Business Park/School to Benfield Road. If Collier County requests the road right of way, the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the needed road right of way up to a width of 60 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, and shall receive impact fee credits equal to 100 percent of the fair market value of the road easement conveyed to the County which has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. No further certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the road easement conveyance is recorded in the public records of Collier County. If this segment of The Lord's Way is not deemed necessary (through documentation, or lack thereof, in the LRTP or the CIE) by the time the development achieves 66 percent of the total approved development quantities, this commitment shall be considered expired. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 41 of 51 Page 701 of 6526 BENFIELD ROAD IMPROVEMENTS VI. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense Benfield Road from Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension to the entrance of Residential Pod E with a two lane undivided cross section and reserve the right of way necessary for the final 4 lane divided cross section. Residential Pod E shall be connected in a consistent manner with the County's right of way reservation plans or construction plans for future Benfield Road sections. Upon completion of such improvement and acceptance by Collier County of the improvements, the Owner shall convey to the County a road easement for the road right of way needed for this section of Benfield Road up to a width of 120 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon recordation of the road easement in the public records of Collier County, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 50% of the fair market value of the road easement necessary for this section of Benfield Road and for 100% of the increase in cost resulting from the construction of the road according to County Standards (arterial) instead of as a local subdivision road. The fair market value of 50% of the conveyance of the road right of way easement to the County has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. Fifty percent 50 %) of the fair market value of the road right of way easement and the total cost of the improvements are site - related improvements. The Cost of this improvement will be determined at the time of construction. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Residential Pod E. These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 6, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 42 of 51 Page 702 of 6526 Florida Power line Easement Resksendal`' Pod C v Resdential Pod ; Residential Pod E The lad' Rattlesnaft Hammock 1 i g ResldeMisl ` _ Pod B Pod A `k IV 'Xna g Lanes/Tum Lanes L ianrt/Twn Lanes to be Canuructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Constructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed Area Prevlou* Dew4oped Area to be Developed VII. Benfield Road South of Rattlesnake Hammock Extension and north of Residential Pod E connection to Benfield Road: the Owner will convey right of way to Collier County by road easement for Benfield Road on areas not to be built by Owner up to a width of 120 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon such conveyance, Collier County will provide road impact fees credits for 100% of the fair market value of the road easement. The value of the right of way has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. The area to be conveyed is depicted in Figure 7, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 43 of 51 Page 703 of 6526 Hacienda Lakes ON - Florida Power Line Easement to Residenttai ` ' I Residents Pod D Residential Pod E VIII. Benfield Road South of Sabal Palm Road: the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the right of way needed for the future construction of Benfield Road south of Sabal Palm Road (approximately 1.00 mile) up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and at no expense to the County. In addition, the Owner shall receive no impact fee credits for such right of way conveyance. This is a site - related improvement. The area to be dedicated is depicted in Figure 8, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 44 of 51 Ratdemm Mammal; Rpa4wension Netider ttal Pod B Pod A Lti>i ti y E sLsueg Larvra/Tum Lanes L Lanes/Tum Lanes to be Constructed/Reconst..ted Roadway Segment Previously Corntrutud r_ Riet of Way to be Preserved Atea PteviocMy Developed Area to be Developed VIII. Benfield Road South of Sabal Palm Road: the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the right of way needed for the future construction of Benfield Road south of Sabal Palm Road (approximately 1.00 mile) up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and at no expense to the County. In addition, the Owner shall receive no impact fee credits for such right of way conveyance. This is a site - related improvement. The area to be dedicated is depicted in Figure 8, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 44 of 51 Page 704 of 6526 IX. As a part of its State and Federal permits, the Owner shall pay for mitigation required for State and or Federal environmental impacts arising from the permitting for portions of Benfield Road described in Commitments VI and VII. In addition to this commitment, the Owner shall at no cost to County either: (1) Convey drainage easement(s) to the County for their stormwater management facility needs free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, or 2) agree to accept stormwater from Benfield Road into the Project's stormwater management system. These are site - related contributions. X. At two thresholds during construction of this DRI, the Owner shall provide to Collier County a transportation analysis which compares the value of the Owner's contribution to the County's public road network against the DRI's proportionate share, (as defined in the State of Florida's HB 7207) of which this DRI impacts County and State road segments. If Owner's contribution is less than its impact based on the transportation analysis, then Owner shall pay to County the difference in three installments starting 90 days after the transportation analysis is agreed to by both parties, and then each 90 days thereafter until paid in full. The transportation contribution by the Developer shall be defined as the sum of all road impact fees paid to date, the costs of the non site - related transportation Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 45 of 51 Page 705 of 6526 improvements (those receiving road impact fee credits) on Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Benfield Road and the Lords Way, plus the value of any road right -of -way conveyance by donation to the County unless otherwise calculated as an impact fee credit. The first transportation analysis shall be submitted to the County when 33% of approved development trips (1,109 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, without projecting forward growth. The second transportation analysis will be submitted when 66% of the approved development trips (2,219 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, with a projection toward build out. The second analysis and reconciliation will finalize any transportation related assessments owed by the Developer for the build out of the Project. With the annual PUD monitoring report, Developer shall provide an annual trip generation analysis of trips approved by Site Development Plan approval and building permit issuance compared to total trips approved within the DRI. Upon triggering 33% or 66% as described above, Developer shall submit the transportation analysis described in this paragraph within six months. No certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the traffic analysis and annual trip generation analysis required by this paragraph and any payments due have been delivered to County, unless the BCC grants an extension. XI. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 75,000 square feet of retail land uses, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop /shelter fronting the Commercial Tract C that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop /shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site - related contribution. XII. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 70,000 square feet of business park land uses, or prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a school or educational facility in the Business Park Tract, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop /shelter fronting the Business Park Tract BP that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop /shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site - related contribution. XIII. DRI traffic studies identified an off -site impact at the interchange of I -75 and S.R. 951 Ramps Intersection, specifically in the left -turn movement serving the northbound S.R. 951 to westbound ( northbound) I -75 turning movement. Assessments of this operation in 2011 indicate that changes to lane usage and signage could augment the acceptable operation of the intersection and delay the impacts of the DRI. Hacienda Lakes traffic becomes significant (exceeds five percent of service volume) at this location at 46.2 percent of site traffic generation. When the first transportation analysis required under subsection X above is undertaken (e.g. at 33 percent of site traffic generation), the existing traffic flow and level of service at this location will be reviewed and projected to the build -out of the DRI. If the 2011 operational assessment is confirmed and the intersection is, or will be, operating at an unacceptable level of service as determined by County or FDOT, then the Developer will identify a solution to offset its impacts and/or restore acceptable operating conditions, and contribute its proportionate share, per subsection X above, of the cost of the improvement to the appropriate government agency. If a proportionate share payment is identified as needed, the owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 100 percent of this contribution. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 46 of 51 Page 706 of 6526 XIV. If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances that are eligible for impact fee credits described in Subsections III, V, VI and VII of this Article VI, Transportation, then Owner shall be entitled to a transportation impact fee credit for the value of the State and Federal environmental mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. The total cost of State and Federal mitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. In lieu of transportation impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County-owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the transportation impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this Subsection XIV. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 47 of 51 Page 707 of 6526 Proposed Acest" Proposed \ Acmes RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RQ, 1 1 1 Ch / U / W / J / O / M / d' W J J O LoWnd CAT STOPISHELTER Proposed CAT Routs 4A 8 48 Extension Existing CAT Rouse 4A 8 48 Q Exbung CAT Fadkty 4A 10 Exis" CAT Facility 48 Exi"CAT Routs 7 Proposed Pedestrian Facilities Exabrig Shared Use Pah pProject Boundary Development Boundary EXISTING CAT ROUTE 7 i (TO MARCO ISLAND) DEVELOPER 1 PROPOSED CAT STOP /SHELTER, THE LORD'S WAY POTENTIAL CAT STOP /SHELTER/ PROPOSED 4A 3 48 CAT ROUTE EXTENSION DEVELOPER PROPOSED CAT STOP/SHELTE 1 PROP. RATTLESNAK HAMMOCK RD. EX1 Land Use Attraction Tract Business Park or School Commercial Preserve Tract Public Fadities Trad (EMS) Junior Deputy School Residential Trad Residential i Medical Use Public ROW Reservation pedaWlan Fadlities VWU as Extended Along AN Internal Ras" Even it Not Shown POTENTIAL CAT STOP/SHELTER EXISTING CAT ROUTE 4A aeiStles WWI as Alerq AB Wornal Roads K Not shown EX13TING CAT ROUTE 4A 348\ evneTrun_ CAT CAT W FACILITY FACILITY 4A (TYP) 48 (TYP) I Hacienda Lakes d Fea Master Mobility Plan STATE LANDS 1?A '1IA " is i a- P—Or_, r+...o oe.: ear e. mro c,,. na Page 708 of 6526 VII PUBLIC UTILITIES A. Per the current 2008 Water and Sewer Master Plan Update, the majority area of this project is located within the Collier County Water -Sewer District Boundary; there are some areas of this project that currently are outside of the Collier County Water & Sewer District Boundary. The areas that are not part of Collier County Water -Sewer District also do not belong to any other Water -Sewer District. Since Public Utilities can provide service as requested by this project, Impact Fees will be applied to the entire area to be developed. B. The project shall connect to the CCWSD potable water system at a location to be determined by the CCWSD when capacity is available. C. The project shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a location determined by CCWSD, when capacity is available. D. This future development is located on the zone of the existing South Hawthorn Wellfield for the wellfield- SCRWTP expansion to 20 MGD. The Rules and Regulations for protection of well fields shall be followed. All well sites and pipeline easements located on and close to this development needs to be shown on all future site development plans, PPL or any other site plans applications. VIII PLANNING A. Prior to the issuance of the first residential Development Order in the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, the Base TDR Credits and Early Entry TDR Bonus Credits shall be severed and redeemed from all Sending Lands to be preserved within one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe and the filing of executed Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s) shall occur for these same lands. B. A permanent conservation mechanism, including Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s), [shall] be attached/applied to all Sending Lands to be preserved beyond one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe prior to final approval of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) for the Hacienda Lakes project. IX SWAMP BUGGY DAYS RECREATION AND SPORTS PARK PUD GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS The following commitments shall only apply to the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts: General Provisions A. All motor racing shall normally be limited to weekends and holidays. No motor racing or practice will commence earlier than 9:00 a.m. and all racing shall be completed no later than 11:00 P.M. B. The shooting and archery ranges shall meet accepted design standards regarding safety and shall be operated and maintained in accordance with accepted safe practices. For security and safety, access to the shooting and archery range areas shall be limited by fencing or other suitable barriers. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 49 of 51 Page 709 of 6526 C. Fencing and/or other suitable barriers will be provided on the site by the Owner for security, safety, and traffic control. Roadways and Traffic A. Roadways within the subject property shall be private roadways and shall be maintained by the Owner. Therefore, said roadways shall be constructed and surfaced in accordance with accepted practices and as permitted by the County Engineer. B. For special events such as the Swamp Buggy races, and as deemed necessary by the County Sheriff, the Owner will arrange for special traffic control at the intersection of the main entrance road with CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Utilities and Service Facilities A. The potable water supply source for the project shall be the County regional water system (now known as the Collier County Water Sewer District). B. Permanent sanitary facilities shall be provided for everyday use by administrative and other personnel. Treatment and disposal of wastewater from said facilities shall be by septic tank/drainfield, or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies. C. Sanitary facilities for spectators and participants at scheduled events shall consist of portable toilets ( provided by a licensed commercial service), or permanent restroom facilities, or both. Wastewater from any permanent facilities provided for spectator use shall be stored in a buried holding tank of suitable capacity and subsequently removed and disposed of offsite by a licensed commercial service; or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies. D. Onsite water well or wells may be constructed (as permitted) for flooding of the Swamp Buggy track and other non - potable uses. X DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD and DRI monitoring until close -out of the PUD and DRI, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD /DRI commitments until close -out of the PUD and DRI. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD and DRI by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 50 of 51 Page 710 of 6526 Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD and DRI are closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD and DRI commitments. CP \10- CPS - 01024 \119 Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 51 of 51 Page 711 of 6526 i w 0 UtiQOHti amaFQtxW Qz Z a WWd Wrn AWr>~ app Azd xwa W o oC) w H C) a U v w a Q D z w W a rs awl a w 0 Page 712 of 6526 O 4 a O w cn a w o w H x w a C7 Q a H H d w xx UU dd W w O z xx co 33 Q zW wo 5 C4 U v H z w x U d d 0 N Page 713 of 6526 HACIENDA LAKES PUD RESIDENTIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP / PLAT / BUILDING PERMIT TOTAL PROJECT RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 1,760 [ UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI - FAMILY] MANDATED UNITS BY GMP: NON - MANDATED UNITS: REDUCED BY: 1. 17 IN C DISTRICT 13 IN R/MU FROM C 25 IN RMU 55 MANDATED RES UNITS 1,705 UNITS [UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI - FAMILY IN ENTIRE PUD] CARETAKER'S RESIDENCES IN ENTIRE PUD 2. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO RV [UP TO 106 RES UNITS IF 290 RV UNITS ARE DEVELOPED] 1 RES UNIT = 2.73 RV UNITS 3. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO SENIOR HOUSING [UP TO 112.50 RES UNITS FOR 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IF DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL] 1 RES UNIT = 4 SENIOR HOUSING EXCEPT INDEPENDENT LIVING SINGLE FAMILY STYLE UNITS ARE 1 TO 1. AT SDP, DETERMINE WHICH MANDATED RES UNITS OR NON - MANDATED UNITS ARE MULTI - FAMILY AND WHICH ARE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICTS THAT ALLOW RES: C DISTRICT: 17 RES UNITS (MANDATED) R DISTRICT: RMU DISTRICT: 38 UNITS (MANDATED) TO RV IN RV DISTRICT: DEDUCT ARE DEVELOPED] TO SENIOR HOUSING: DEDUCT RESIDENTIAL] TOTAL: 1,760 CONVERSIONS: UP TO 106 RES UNITS IF 290 RV UNITS UP TO 112.50 IF RES UNITS ARE DERIVED FROM 3 of 5 Page 714 of 6526 HACIENDA LAKES PUD COMMERCIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP TOTAL PROJECT COMMERCIAL INTENSITY 327,500 IN GROSS FLOOR AREA: 70,000 140,000 92,000 BP DISTRICT: A) _ 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES RETAIL OFFICE BP HOTEL OF 135 ROOMS AND IF HOTEL BUILT HERE AND NOT IN C DISTRICT, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA FOR HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS (HOTEL CONVERSION DISAPPEARS) OR IF NO HOTEL IN BP & NO HOTEL IN C, ADD 60,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES (THIS IS HOTEL CONVERSION) OR B) PRIVATE OR PUBLIC SCHOOL UP TO 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) R/MU DISTRICT: UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF MEDICAL - RELATED USES ALL USES ARE OFFICE USES EXCEPT FOR DRUG STORES AND PROPRIETORY STORES (GROUP 5912) WHICH IS RETAIL] CHECK APPROVED RETAIL IN TRACT C — CAN'T GO OVER 327,500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL IN THE ENTIRE PUD] CHECK OFFICE IN TRACT C — CAN'T GO OVER 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA IN ENTIRE PUD] TRACT C: 327,500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL; 1. DEDUCT MEDICAL RETAIL APPROVED IN RMU 2. DEDUCT SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF SENIOR HOUSING NOT DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL UNITS [MAX 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] 4of5 Page 715 of 6526 3. UP TO 81,875 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE [= 25% OF TOTAL]; AND IF NO HOTEL IN BP & HOTEL CONVERSION NOT USED IN BP, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS; AND 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE USES 1. DEDUCT UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE IF APPROVED IN RMU DISTRICT CONVERSIONS IN TRACT C: UP TO 25% OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO OFFICE ON A ONE -TO -ONE BASIS [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO SF SENIOR HOUSING ON A ONE -TO -ONE BASIS [MAY HAVE 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] 5of5 Page 716 of 6526 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of: ORDINANCE 2011 -41 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 25th day of October, 2011, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 28th day of October, 2011. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk Ex- officio to Board, of....._r ti• County Commissio7si ••,RS•, 3 ' r, r z By: Martha VercYa, Deputy Cle' k;8 ",L -` V • V lte' Page 717 of 6526 Hacienda Lakes MPUD: PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 1 of 7 Revised: 9/21/11 BCC Hearing Date 10/11/11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PUDZ-2006-AR-10146: Hacienda Lakes MPUD -- An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Agricultural (A), Agricultural-Special Treatment Overlay (A-ST) and PUD zoning district (Swamp Buggy Days PUD) to the Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning district for a project known as the Hacienda Lakes MPUD that will allow a maximum of 327,500 square feet of gross retail commercial floor area; 70,000 gross square feet of professional and medical office space including a conversion of retail use to professional and medical office; 135 hotel rooms including a conversion to business park; 140,000 gross square feet of business park or education facility; a public school; continuation of existing “swamp buggy” attraction and “Junior Deputy” passive recreation; and a maximum of 1,760 residential dwelling units including conversions to recreational vehicle park and senior housing for independent living, assisted living and nursing care. The subject property, consisting of 2,262 +/- acres is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) at the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake- Hammock Road and north and south of Sabal Palm Road in Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24 and 25, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, and Sections 19 and 30, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida; providing for repeal of Ordinance Number 84-26, for swamp buggy grounds; and by providing an effective date (Companion to Petitions DRI-2006-AR-10147 and CP-2006-11). OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) review staff’s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding this PUD rezone petition; and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: Approval of this project to allow for a mix of residential, commercial (retail and office), hotel, business park or education facility uses as well as the continuation of existing junior deputies passive recreation and existing swamp buggy attraction uses. The petitioner is requesting approval of this PUD for Hacienda Lakes to allow development as shown below. TRACT TYPE UNITS. ACREAGE± TRACT “R” RESIDENTIAL 1,714 447.86 TRACT “R/MU“ RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE 25 min. 38.82 TRACT “BP” BUSINESS PARK 1 35.38 TRACT "C" COMMERCIAL 17 min 34.16 TRACT “A” ATTRACTION 1 47.27 TRACT “P” PRESERVE 0 1,544.14 Page 718 of 6526 Hacienda Lakes MPUD: PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 2 of 7 Revised: 9/21/11 BCC Hearing Date 10/11/11 TRACT “PF” PUBLIC FACILITY 0 1.33 TRACT “JD” JUNIOR DEPUTY 2 21.62 TRACT “ROW” PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 72.01 TRACT “S” SCHOOL 0 19.55 Total 1,760 2262.14 (NOTE: If the developer decides to develop an RV use, it must consist of not less than 20 acres, and that acreage would be subtracted from the R designated area.) As proposed the project will be developed in one eight-year phase that is to be divided into two stages (2012-2016 and 2015-2019 as shown below as an excerpt from Master Plan), with development to begin in 2012. Buildout is projected to occur in 2019. These dates could be adjusted based upon approval date and appeal periods. This PUD application is one of three applications under consideration for the subject site. Companions to this application are a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (GMPA) and an Application for Development Approval (ADA) of a Development of Regional Impact (DRI). The Swamp Buggy Days lands are included within this project. The project incorporates the Swamp Buggy Days PUD (Ordinance #84-26) uses. That will allow the uses that were permitted in that project to continue, or be established if they have not been. Please refer to Section VI. Tract “A” Attraction Permitted Uses,” and IX. “Swamp Buggy Days Recreation and Sports Park PUD General Development Commitments.” FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The County’s Future Land Use Map designates [approximately 1,637 acres] of the subject site as Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) Sending Lands, Belle Meade Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA) Overlay. The balance of the site has the future land use designations of the Urban Residential Fringe (URF) Subdistrict, and Mixed Use Activity Center (MUAC) No. 7. Policies and Provisions for these designations are located in the FLUE and the CCME of the Growth Management Plan. The property owner submitted an application to amend the GMP (GMPA) in petition CP-2006- 11 seeking to amend the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Conservation and Coastal Page 719 of 6526 Hacienda Lakes MPUD: PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 3 of 7 Revised: 9/21/11 BCC Hearing Date 10/11/11 Management Element (CCME). That petition is a companion to this petition and it must be approved in order for this petition to be consistent with the GMP. For more details, please refer to the Comprehensive Planning Staff memo, dated July 12, 2011. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard this petition on September 1, 2011, and by a vote of 7 to 0 (Paul Midney was not present and there is one vacant position on the Commission), with Commissioner Schiffer making the motion and Commissioner Ahern seconding the motion, recommended forwarding this petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval subject to the following changes to be made to the PUD document: Exhibit A: 1) Project Land Use Tracts: Adjust Tract C to remove 2.51 acres because it is already included in Tract ROW; 2) Tract R/MU: Remove "units or RV" from introductory paragraph; 3) Tract BP Permitted Uses: Correct #16; 4) Tract C: Change "PB" to "BP" in the introductory paragraph; 5) Tract A Principal Uses: Revise Item 8 to address DRI substantial deviation requirements; 6) Tract S Accessory Uses: Add "Recreational Facilities"; 7) Signs: Renumber the deviation references to reflect the petitioner's withdrawal of the previous deviation #1; Exhibit B: 1. Revise Table II paragraph to address Collier County public schools; 2. Revise Table III paragraph to address Collier County public schools; 3. Maximum Density and Intensity – Residential Density: correct the number 1,332 to 1,232; 4. Land Use Conversion Factors – Residential Density: Refine the RV, Senior Housing Uses and total residential uses; 5. Land Use Conversion Factors: Clarify the BP tract school facilities use; 6. Land Use Conversion Factors – Senior Housing Intensity: add the word "project"; 7. Land Use Conversion Factors: Clarify the total project intensity; 8. Recreational Vehicle Park Criteria: Remove references to Tract R as the applicant has added a separate RV designation; 9. Recreational Vehicle Park Criteria: Clarify that the RV parcels cannot be less than 20 acres in size instead of 24.2 acres; 10. Sign Development Standards: Renumber the deviation reference to reflect the petitioner's withdrawal of the previous deviation #1; 11. Site Development or Plat Approval: add "with each SDP or plat application" to the end of the item. 12. Table I: Remove the column townhouse alley design; 13. Table I: Add "or ½ the building height whichever is greater" to Minimum Distance for MPUD; 14. Table I footnote: Add "zoned" to Building Height; 15. Table I notes – Remove Note #2 about Firewall protrusion; 16. Table I notes Note #3: Change 50 feet to 35 feet; 17. Figures 2-5: Revise each exhibit to correct the "Preserve Cloud" location; 18. Figure #6: Delete this figure; Page 720 of 6526 Hacienda Lakes MPUD: PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 4 of 7 Revised: 9/21/11 BCC Hearing Date 10/11/11 19. Table II: Add "including mixed use buildings" to the title; 20. Table II -- Minimum yards: Replace "tract" with "lot" and add "or ½ the building height whichever is greater"; 21. Table II – Revise Maximum zoned height from 75 feet to 50 feet and 85 feet to 60 feet actual height, adding a footnote to exempt hotel, destination resort, senior housing or mixed use buildings that can be up to 75 feet in zoned height and 85 feet in actual height; 22. Table II Footnotes: remove the unused iii. 23. Table III – Add "Collier County School District" to the exclusion in the title; 24. Table III – Remove "SBR" and "including portable classrooms" from all locations in this table; 25. The Lord's Way Access Improvements: Remove two instances of the word "generally"; Exhibit C: Modify R/RV to R or RV; Exhibit E: 1. Deviation #1 was withdrawn by the applicant, therefore the deviations shall be re-numbered. 2. Deviation #5 (now #4) shall be revised to reflect a wall will not be required on the Business Park tract for the Lord's Way frontage only. Exhibit F: 1. I--Legal Item C: Add language to require a replacement easement for the Boness tract; 2. II--Environmental: Table footnote. Correct citation to read LDC Subsection 2.05.02.B.2.g.ii; 3. IV--Archaeological and Historic Resources: Add language to require approval from the State of Florida Division of Historical Resources; 4. V--Emergency Medical Services: Add language to address EMS impact fee credits for mitigation; 5. V--Emergency Medical Services: Add the number $30,000 for acreage valuation. 6. VI—Transportation – South Area III: Add the $30,000 per acre number for fair market value; 7. VI—Transportation – North Area V: Remove "140,000 square feet of" at the beginning of Business Park; 8. VI—Transportation – North Area V: Change width of 90 feet to width of 60 feet; 9. VI—Transportation – North Area V: Add the $30,000 per acre number for fair market value; 10. VI—Transportation – Benfield Road Improvements VI: Change width of 150 feet to 120 feet; 11. VI—Transportation – Benfield Road Improvements VI: Add "100% of" before "the increase in cost…;" 12. VI—Transportation – Benfield Road Improvements VI: Add the $30,000 per acre number for fair market value; 13. VI—Transportation – Benfield Road Improvements VII: Change width of 150 feet to 120 feet; 14. VI—Transportation – Benfield Road Improvements VI: Add the $30,000 per acre number for fair market value; Page 721 of 6526 Hacienda Lakes MPUD: PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 5 of 7 Revised: 9/21/11 BCC Hearing Date 10/11/11 15. VI—Transportation – Benfield Road Improvements VIII: Change width of 150 feet to 120 feet; 16. VI—Transportation – Benfield Road Improvements XIII: Add language into the PUD document similar to what is in the DRI DO Transportation Item G; 17. VII—Public Utilities – Revise language to mirror the Utilities information from the DRI DO; The changes requested have been made to the draft Ordinance, and the petition was approved on the September 15, 2011 CCPC Consent agenda. Because the staff report recommended approval and CCPC approval recommendation was unanimous, and there is no correspondence in opposition, this petition can be placed on the Summary Agenda. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: [Quasi-judicial, Four-fifths vote for approval] This PUD gives the applicant multiple options for development by allowing conversions from one use to another, both within a proposed district and also from one district to another. These conversions make the PUD very complex and difficult to administer. The LDC does not expressly allow conversions. If the BCC elects to approve this PUD with the conversions, then the County Attorney’s Office recommends an LDC amendment to allow for conversions. This is a site specific rezone to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for MPUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed MPUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Page 722 of 6526 Hacienda Lakes MPUD: PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 6 of 7 Revised: 9/21/11 BCC Hearing Date 10/11/11 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with MPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed MPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested MPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. Page 723 of 6526 Hacienda Lakes MPUD: PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 7 of 7 Revised: 9/21/11 BCC Hearing Date 10/11/11 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot (“reasonably”) be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a “core” question…) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed MPUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the MPUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The BCC must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney’s Office. This item has been reviewed for legal sufficiency and is legally sufficient for Board action. An affirmative vote of four is necessary for Board approval. (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendations of the CCPC and further recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request subject to the attached PUD Ordinance that includes both the staff recommendation and the CCPC recommendation. PREPARED BY: Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section, Land Development Services Department, Growth Management Division, Planning and Regulation Attachments: 1) Staff Report 2) Comprehensive Planning Memo, dated July 12, 2011 3) Ordinance 4) Back up material information sheet Page 724 of 6526 Page 725 of 6526 Page 726 of 6526 Page 727 of 6526 Page 728 of 6526 Page 729 of 6526 Page 730 of 6526 Page 731 of 6526 Page 732 of 6526 Page 733 of 6526 Page 734 of 6526 Page 735 of 6526 Page 736 of 6526 Page 737 of 6526 Page 738 of 6526 Page 739 of 6526 Page 740 of 6526 Page 741 of 6526 Page 742 of 6526 Page 743 of 6526 Page 744 of 6526 Page 745 of 6526 Page 746 of 6526 Page 747 of 6526 Page 748 of 6526 Page 749 of 6526 Page 750 of 6526 Page 751 of 6526 Page 752 of 6526 1 LauraDeJohnVEN From:LauraDeJohnVEN Sent:Thursday, July 10, 2025 1:31 PM To:'mspokojny@aol.com' Cc:Ailyn Padron; Ray Bellows; Michael Sawyer; Michael Bosi Subject:RE: Planning Commission Meeting July 17, 2025 Milt, Thank you for providing input for the 7/17 CCPC meeting. I will include your email and attachment in the backup documentation for the meeting. Please be aware that the Traffic Study referenced in your correspondence (the applicant’s January 2025 Traffic Study) is associated with the pending Site Development Plan application (County application # PL20240000445). The Planning Commission and Board do not consider or review Site Development Plan petitions. Site Development Plans do not go to public hearing. The Planning Commission and Board will be considering these two items: Auto Service Station Waiver of Distance (for facility with fuel pumps) - (ASW-PL20240011790) Insubstantial Change to the PUD (PDI-PL20240011559) These two items considered by the Planning Commission and Board relate to the distance of the proposed fuel pumps from existing fuel pumps at 7-Eleven, and the deviations from design standards that are being sought related to: architectural glazing, building façade massing, light fixture heights, loading spaces, landscape standards, signage, and timing of a future transit stop/shelter at time of future development of the commercial outparcel at the SE corner of Collier Blvd/Rattlesnake Hammock. During the public hearing process, the Planning Commission and Board will be deliberating these items only. They will not be evaluating the Traffic Study that is associated with the Site Development Plan in their decision making. If you have questions on this, feel free to contact me or Ray. Thanks, Laura From: mspokojny@aol.com <mspokojny@aol.com> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2025 10:50 AM To: LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercountyfl.gov>; Ray Bellows <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>; Ailyn Padron <Ailyn.Padron@colliercountyfl.gov>; MILTON SPOKOJNY <mspokojny@aol.com> Subject: Re: Planning Commission Meeting July 17, 2025 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Ray Bellows Attached please find a cover and traffic analysis that I request that you include for in your packet the CCPC to review regarding the July 17, 2025 meeting before the CCPC. Thanks, Milt Spokojny Page 753 of 6526 2 On Thursday, July 10, 2025 at 09:29:43 AM EDT, Ray Bellows <ray.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Hi Laura, Please provide Milt Spokojny with the applicable information requested below. Thank you for your assistance. Ray Bellows Manager - Planning Zoning Office:239-252-2463 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov From: mspokojny@aol.com <mspokojny@aol.com> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2025 8:25 AM To: Ray Bellows <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>; Ailyn Padron <Ailyn.Padron@colliercountyfl.gov>; MILTON SPOKOJNY <mspokojny@aol.com> Subject: Fw: Planning Commission Meeting July 17, 2025 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Ailyn Padron suggested that I reach out to you in order to receive the following information: The Collier County Planning Department's written recommendations on Costco's request for incidental changes and the their request for a 500 foot waiver in order to construct a gas station. These are the recommendations that would be sent to the CCPC for their July 17th meeting on Costco's proposals. As always, thanks for your assistance. Page 754 of 6526 3 Milt Spokojny Sent from AOL on Android ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: "mspokojny@aol.com" <mspokojny@aol.com> To: "Ailyn Padron" <ailyn.padron@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: "Ray Bellows" <ray.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>, "Sean Sammon" <sean.sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>, "MILTON SPOKOJNY" <mspokojny@aol.com> Sent: Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 12:02 AM Subject: RE: Planning Commission Meeting July 17, 2025 Good morning Ailyn, I was just wondering if the agenda for the CCPC meeting on July 17th has been prepared yet. Also, has the Planning Department made their written recommendations yet on Costco's request for incidental changes and the the 500 foot waiver request to construct a gas station. Please send me these documents at your earliest convenience. Thanks, Milt Spokojny Sent from AOL on Android On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 10:08 AM, Ailyn Padron <Ailyn.Padron@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: You’re very welcome,, Milt. Have a great day! Page 755 of 6526 4 Ailyn Padron Management Analyst I Zoning Office:239-252-5187 2800 Horseshoe Dr. Naples, Florida 34104 Ailyn.Padron@colliercountyfl.gov From: mspokojny@aol.com <mspokojny@aol.com> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 9:38 AM To: Ailyn Padron <Ailyn.Padron@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Ray Bellows <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>; MILTON SPOKOJNY <mspokojny@aol.com> Subject: RE: Planning Commission Meeting July 17, 2025 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thank you Ailyn Sent from AOL on Android On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 9:26 AM, Ailyn Padron <Ailyn.Padron@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Good morning, Milt, Thank you for your email. Please see my responses in blue. Thank you. Page 756 of 6526 5 Ailyn Padron Management Analyst I Zoning Office:239-252-5187 2800 Horseshoe Dr. Naples, Florida 34104 Ailyn.Padron@colliercountyfl.gov From: mspokojny@aol.com <mspokojny@aol.com> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2025 11:54 AM To: Ailyn Padron <Ailyn.Padron@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Ray Bellows <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov>; MILTON SPOKOJNY <mspokojny@aol.com> Subject: Planning Commission Meeting July 17, 2025 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Ailyn Padron Hi Ailyn, Sean Sammon suggested that I contact you regarding the upcoming Planning Commission meeting scheduled for July 17th, 2025 regarding Costco's proposal to construct a Costco facility on the corner of Collier and Rattlesnake Roads. In this regard, I am a homeowner at Hacienda Lakes and have several questions. 1. When will homeowners receive official notification of the Planning Commission meeting that is scheduled for July 17, 2025. The property owner letters were mailed out on 6/27/25 and the advertisement was published on the Clerk’s website on 6/27/25. Also, the signs have been posted on the property. Please use the link below: Search Results: – Collier Legal Notices 2. What is the mechanism for a person to speak at the Planning Commission meeting? Is there a sign in sheet and how long can a speaker speak? The public may participate in person or virtually at the Planning Commissioner’s hearing. If the public chooses to speak in person, a speaker form will need to be filled out. The speaker forms along with the agenda will be provided at the hearing. The agenda is published a week prior to the hearing; it will include the registration link. Page 757 of 6526 6 3. What is the Zoom link for property owners to sign into to watch the meeting?; Can a homeowner address the Planning Commission via the Zoom link and what is the mechanism for doing this? The public may watch the hearing on Collier TV. Please see below. Homepage - Collier Television The public may participate and/ or observe through Zoom. The registration link will be included in the agenda, which is published a week prior to the hearing. If you prefer, I can add you as an attendee, however, you will still need to register virtually. Please be advised that the county is not responsible for any technical difficulties that may arise with virtual participation. 4. If a homeowner wants to send a written document to the Planning Commission for their review prior to the meeting, what is the mechanism for doing this? I will defer this question to Ray. Respectfully submitted, Milt Spokojny 248-821-7184 Sent from AOL on Android Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Page 758 of 6526 July 10, 2025 Collier County Planning Commission Collier County Government Center 3303 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112-4961 Subject: Traffic Impact Analysis for Proposed Costco at SR-951 and SR-863 Dear Collier County Planning Commissioners: A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) has been prepared for Costco by Kittelson and Associates in support of constructing a Costco warehouse at the southeast corner of Collier Blvd (SR- 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road (SR-864). We understand that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and associated departments have been in the process of reviewing the study. In support of this effort, residents of Hacienda Lakes are hereby providing additional input to the review process for your consideration. In light of the large volume of new residential and commercial construction underway in the immediate area, a number of concerns have been raised by residents of Hacienda Lakes communities regarding traffic and related safety impacts that a large volume commercial enterprise (such as Costco) may create if the traffic design and controls are not optimized. We believe the CCTDR will conduct a thorough analysis, and in support of this effort we have reviewed the TIS from our own, non-professional perspective. To this end, attached is a brief review of the January 2025 Traffic Impact Study for your consideration. We hope this is constructive and helpful as you work through analysis and important decisions. A few brief observations: The TIS seems to be limited in scope with respect to areas of analysis that are of interest to the CCPC and Collier County Transportation Operations Development Review Department (CCTDR), especially Safety, Access Management and Neighborhood Impacts. For example, bicycle and pedestrian traffic and historical accidents at the intersection were not considered. Also, most of the residents in Hacienda Lakes are constricted to ingress/egress via Rattlesnake Hammock without alternative means of access to the nearest artery. Secondly, Capacity analysis appears to be somewhat fiawed in that it utilizes baseline data not refiective of true peak traffic and does not consider the rapid rate of construction in the immediate area. Also, many new communities in the area were not included in the analysis, especially those without direct access to Rattlesnake Hammock, but that do have convenient indirect access and will add to the traffic. Finally, the overall traffic fiow design is not well justifled in the TIS. The locations of access points, ineffectiveness of the access to the hospital road, number of Page 759 of 6526 entrances on Rattlesnake Hammock, pedestrian and bicycle traffic and access to Publix (requiring delays for pedestrians) should also be considered in a thoughtful design. We encourage the CCPC to request a more comprehensive traffic fiow design from Costco (or any large-scale retail or commercial enterprise considering this location), or possibly even contracting an independent professional traffic consultant to address some of these concerns. Our goal is simply to support the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and the CCTDR so that the end result is not simply a code-compliant construction project, but an integrated design that attempts to optimize access, traffic fiow, safety and quality of life for residents and visitors to the Hacienda Lakes area, as well as users of these key roads. Thank you for your consideration and please let us know if further clariflcation is needed. We appreciate your willingness to listen. Sincerely, Submitted on Behalf of Residents of Esplanade and Azure at Hacienda Lakes Page 760 of 6526 Costco South Naples January 2025 Traffic Impact Analysis Review 6/24/2025 1 Overview This document summarizes observations regarding the Traffic Impact Analysis commissioned by Costco in support of potentially locating a new warehouse facility on the southeast corner of CR-951 (Collier Blvd) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road in Collier County. The Analysis was prepared by Kittelson and Associates (Orlando FL office) and issued in January 2025. The purpose of this summary is to provide constructive input to the Collier County Planning Commission as they consider traffic and safety concerns of the proposed project on the surrounding businesses and residents of the area, and particularly those that are not fully addressed in the Analysis. This is not an exhaustive review but hopefully it serves to highlight speciflc areas where further analysis should be considered. This summary was not prepared by professional engineers, but by residents of adjacent communities, and therefore may include inaccurate assumptions or naïve questions, so we ask the CCPC for their understanding as they consider these inputs. The Analysis appears to be thorough in its methodology, but it should be noted that: 1) There are important safety and traffic concerns that may have been outside the scope of the Analysis which should be considered, 2) It may be advisable to reflne several underlying assumptions 3) There may be changes or additions to the overall design that the CCPC could consider to result in improved safety and convenience for residents and visitors of the area. These topics are briefiy described below and speciflc cross-references to the Analysis are shown in the attached table. Traffic and Safety Concerns Outside the Scope of the Analysis • Pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Many already use the existing bike lanes and walking paths in the area and this traffic will only continue to grow with new residential construction underway. Of special concern are: crossing Collier to/from new residential buildings to/from Publix and added delays to car traffic fiow at all controlled intersections. This was not considered in the Analysis. • Impact of residential and commercial construction currently underway that is not directly on Rattlesnake Hammock. There will be signiflcant additional traffic related to developments not directly on Rattlesnake Hammock (e.g. Seven Shores, Sapphire Page 761 of 6526 Costco South Naples January 2025 Traffic Impact Analysis Review 6/24/2025 2 Cove, proposed school), a number of large residential buildings north of 7/11, Florida Sports Park, all of which will produce some traffic on Rattlesnake Hammock and to/from Costco. Also, there is a new road under construction from Rattlesnake Hammock to Seven Shores near the entrance to Azure. This was not considered in the Analysis. • Emergency access to/from Physicians Regional and the CC EMS Station. The concern is that emergency vehicle movement could be impeded by additional traffic and controlled intersections. Also, the Costco proposal includes an entrance on a hospital emergency room access road that directs exiting traffic onto the hospital property, rather than towards Collier Blvd. There would be no direct access for flre equipment to the proposed fueling area or other structures in the Costco area. This was not considered in the Analysis. • Recent accidents and fatalities at the intersection of Collier and Rattlesnake Hammock. There have been at least two fatalities in recent years at this intersection. Design and/or improvements should consider reducing such incidents. This was not considered in the Analysis. • Proximity of Costco fueling location to other adjacent fueling locations vs. County Policy. A waiver is under consideration; however, the existing policy was created out of interest in safety. Strong justiflcation should be required and made public. There are already two gasoline stations at the intersection and Costco’s additional fueling station would beneflt less than one third of the area residents (membership required). Some Assumptions and Baseline Data May Be Inaccurate • Assumed traffic growth rate of 5%/year is not based on construction plans in the whole area or real estate data. See comments below regarding pages 80-81 of the Analysis. • Baseline roadway Level of Service (LOS) does not include peak months of February and March. • Baseline traffic data was collected in May 2024 (used to deflne seasonable adjustment); actual peak season analysis not shown. Why not use actual data instead of a formula for adjustment? • Costco trip data and fueling queueing is based on national averages. North Naples store may be a better comparison due to seasonality. Additional Thoughts for Improvement • There is no rationale for the decision to install a second traffic light on Rattlesnake Hammock. The Analysis claims that other options (like a traffic circle) were analyzed, but such analysis is not provided. Perhaps there is a more effective design. Page 762 of 6526 Costco South Naples January 2025 Traffic Impact Analysis Review 6/24/2025 3 • In general, traffic fiow in the area was not optimized, only analysis of proposed changes (e.g. adding turn lanes and lights) to keep traffic within Level of Service parameters was considered. Two examples of possible improvement: a) Costco customers making U-turns on Rattlesnake Hammock or in the Hospital parking lot to get back to Collier does not make sense for good fiow. One solution would be to make the Hospital entrance road into the main Costco entrance. This could work if the Hospital would agree to share the access. b) The northbound right turn lane on Collier is often blocked today by northbound traffic at the light; this will only become worse unless the turn lane is extended or the Costco entrance on the Hospital road is changed. • The Analysis does not address Collier County Access Management Policy clause 5.02.9 or 5.02.10. A number of communities (e.g. Azure and Esplanade) rely on Rattlesnake Hammock as the only access to a main artery; residents are otherwise captive in a cul- de-sac situation. The proposed additional traffic lights and traffic on Rattlesnake Hammock signiflcantly impedes access for residents, which is important for a number of reasons. Perhaps the Hospital Road could be converted to a main entrance to Costco. This would facilitate fiow for Costco customers and may be acceptable for the Hospital since they have another existing main entrance. Page 763 of 6526 Costco South Naples January 2025 Traffic Impact Analysis Review 6/24/2025 4 Notes on Specific Pages of the Document Page Content Comment 9 The Study is based on 2023 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory (AUIR). This does NOT include data on Rattlesnake Hammock (RSH) east of Collier. This determines existing baseline assumptions regarding traffic capacity and usage at the intersection. Later in the study they simply assumed that 4% of the trips entering the intersection come from RSH east of Collier. 9 Baseline data was acquired on May 22, 2024. This obviously avoids peak season which is shown to be Week 3 – Week 15 (page 53). Therefore baseline data is not representative of peak requirements and uses a questionable seasonable adjustment factor (SF) of 1.04. Clariflcation from Collier County would be helpful as to how this factor is to be applied and to which roads (e.g. feeders vs arteries). 15 Project will generate an estimated 7,319 new net daily trips through the intersection. At the public meeting Costco told the residents it would be 4500. 18 Background traffic was assumed to grow at 4.59% per year. This is a general average, not based on speciflc analysis of known growth in the area which is not changing linearly over many years but with a number of steps up as new residence facilities open in the next 1-2 years. 20 Planned development analysis only considers projects on RSH. Analysis does not consider traffic generated by new developments with access to RSH (e.g. Seven Shores with new access road being built, properties north of 7/11, Sapphire Cove, potential school). 22 The plan proposes a right in / left out access on the hospital “driveway”. It is currently an Emergency Entrance road to the hospital emergency room. The proposal only allows traffic to enter Costco from the hospital property (westbound) and only allows traffic to exit eastbound onto the hospital property. There is not direct access to Collier Blvd. for regular traffic or flre equipment access to Costco fueling area. This right in / left out design is not practical except for construction traffic or ambulance trips to Costco. Page 764 of 6526 Costco South Naples January 2025 Traffic Impact Analysis Review 6/24/2025 5 Page Content Comment 26, 131 Turn lanes are to be constructed to the County standard which is based on speed limit. The north bound ramp from Collier to RSH is currently too short due to long wait lines at the light. This will only become worse unless the access ramp is lengthened. 28 Fueling area capacity is calculated based on national averages for Costco stores. Perhaps an analysis of the existing North Naples store at peak season would give a more accurate capacity analysis. 32 “The proposed full access driveway is projected to have inadequate capacity as a stop-controlled intersection. A traffic signal and a roundabout were evaluated as potential intersection control alternatives in an Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) and Signal Warrant Analysis report under a separate cover. A traffic signal is the recommended traffic control alternative at the full access intersection.” This second traffic light and the anticipated u- turning customers from Costo will add signiflcant delays on westbound RSH. There is no analysis of this delay or associated safety considerations. The “separate cover” analysis of traffic circle vs. traffic light should be provided to local residents. 36 Planned build out year is 2026. Just an item to note. 42 “Data contained within the 2023 AUIR will be used to analyze the proposed study roadway segments.” This should be updated with 2024 or even 2025 data. This is the baseline data set used to model all assumptions. It should be as current as possible before approval. The County could require a rerun of the data tables with most recent data available (including the segment of RSH east of Collier). Page 765 of 6526 Costco South Naples January 2025 Traffic Impact Analysis Review 6/24/2025 6 Page Content Comment 47 “Level of service calculations for road facilities means calculations for peak hour traffic on a roadway segment for maximum service volumes at the adopted LOS. Peak hour is calculated as the 100th highest hour based on a 10 month period (omitting February and March), which is generally equivalent to the 250th highest hour for a twelve (12) month period. For design of roadway capacity projects, the 30th highest hour for a 12-month period at LOS "D" will be utilized.” Their method of determining traffic Level of Service (LOS) omits data from February and March. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that traffic will be actually worse than the analysis during those months. 53 Seasonable adjustment factor for May (1.04) was applied for the analysis. This avoids peak season which is shown to be Week 3 – Week 15. Therefore baseline data is not representative of peak requirements and uses a seasonable adjustment factor (SF) of 1.04 instead of 0.88 (end of Feb or early March). Why not use actual data from peak season? 67- 69 Trip generation for Supermarket exceeds assumed additional allowed traffic for out parcels. Appears to preclude a supermarket in the out parcel area. Current Publix cannot handle the anticipated volume of new residents in the immediate area. This is an unaddressed need. 70- 72 Trip generation for a Drive-in Bank is within assumed additional allowed traffic for out parcels. Nore: a bank could go in the out parcel area. 73- 75 Trip generation for a small General Office Building is within assumed additional allowed traffic for out parcels. Allows only a very small office building in the out parcel area Page 766 of 6526 Costco South Naples January 2025 Traffic Impact Analysis Review 6/24/2025 7 Page Content Comment 80- 81 Traffic growth trend analysis starts in 2018 and assumes linear growth of about 5%. Trend assumptions may not be accurate. The following are not considered in the model: Growth was typical in 2018-2019. Heavily impacted by Covid in 2020-2021. Prices and construction in South Naples peak 2022-2023. Residence inventory in South Naples continues to grow very quickly 2024-2026. Traffic load probably follows the number of residents. 84- 108 Traffic impact of new developments that are included in the analysis. Includes: Cadenza, Allegro, 7/11 & shops, Hammock Park, Watercrest (assisted living facility). Analysis does not consider traffic due to properties that are not directly on east RSH but with access roads to RSH: Sapphire Cove, Seven Shores (new road under construction), large complexes directly north of 7/11. 128 Collier County Access Management Policy Collier County will determine if clause 5.02.9 is being followed. Residents of Azure and Esplanade do not have a reasonable alternative route to a main artery except through Costo traffic and control lights. 128 Collier County Access Management Policy Collier County will determine if clause 5.02.10 is being followed. Residents of Azure and Esplanade could take the position that emergency services from Collier EMS Station at Hacienda Lakes Parkway and Caimen Dr or Physicians Regional Hospital are hampered in their access to the communities. Page 767 of 6526 Page 768 of 6526 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at 9:00 A.M. on October 14, 2025, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL to consider: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 11-41, AS AMENDED, THE HACIENDA LAKES MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TO APPROVE AN INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE PUD, TO ADD DEVIATIONS FOR RELIEF FROM THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE RELATING TO ARCHITECTURAL GLAZING STANDARDS, BUILDING FAÇADE MASSING, LIGHT FIXTURE HEIGHTS, LOADING SPACES, LANDSCAPE STANDARDS FOR INTERIOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS, AND SIGNAGE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PARCEL IS IN THE COMMERCIAL TRACT OF THE MPUD AND IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF ±25.86 ACRES OF THE ± 2,262 ACRE MPUD. [PL20240011559] AND A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, GRANTING A WAIVER FROM THE MINIMUM REQUIRED SEPARATION OF 500 FEET BETWEEN FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS PURSUANT TO SECTION 5.05.05.B OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A COSTCO WHOLESALE, WITH A RESULTING SEPARATION DISTANCE OF 132 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE OF THE EXISTING 7-ELEVEN. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE COMMERCIAL TRACT OF THE HACIENDA LAKES MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF ±25.86 ACRES OF THE ± 2,262 ACRE MPUD. [PL20240011790] Page 769 of 6526 A copy of the proposed Ordinance/ Resolution is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted ten (10) minutes to speak on an item. Written materials int ended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.collier.gov/Calendar-Events-directory after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a court esy and is at the user’s risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.Willig@collier.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Page 770 of 6526 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BURT L. SAUNDERS, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER Page 771 of 6526