The URL can be used to link to this page

HEX Agenda 09/11/2025COLLIER COUNTY Hearing Examiner AGENDA Conf Room 609/610 Growth Management Community Development Department Planning & Regulation Building 2800 N Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 September 11, 2025 1:00 PM Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP Hearing Examiner Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes unless otherwise waived by the Hearing Examiner. Persons Wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the hearing report packets must have that material submitted to County staff at Ailyn.Padron@CollierCountyFL.gov 10 days prior to the Hearing. All materials used during presentation at the hearing will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner are final unless appealed to the Board of County Commissioners. Hearing Procedures will provide for presentation by the Applicant, presentation by staff, public comment and applicant rebuttal. The Hearing Examiner will render a decision within 30 days. Persons wishing to receive a copy of the decision by mail may supply County staff with their name, address, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope for that purpose. Persons wishing to receive an electronic copy of the decision may supply their email address. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Review of Agenda 3. Advertised Public Hearing 3.A. Petition No. DR- PL20240009817 – Calida Ventures, LLC – 2934 Tamiami Trail East - Request for approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks three deviations: (1) from LDC Section 4.02.16.A.1.a.ii to instead allow for a maximum front setback of 53’ along US 41/Tamiami Trail East; (2) from LDC Section 4.02.16.A.1.a.ii to instead allow for a maximum Front setback of 70.1’ along Bayshore Drive; (3) from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4 to instead allow for a gradual reduction in width of a portion of the perimeter landscape buffer from 20’ to 18.9’ as shown on the Site Plan with Deviations, consisting of ±1.92 acres and located at 2934 Tamiami Trail East, in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Planner III] Commissioner District 4 (2025-2524) Page 1 of 271 3.B. Petition No. BD-PL20240009955 - 1609 Gordon River -Request for a 13-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways 100 feet or greater in width, to allow a boat docking facility protruding a total of 33 feet into a waterway that is 122± feet wide, pursuant to LDC Section 5.03.06.H. The subject property is located at 1609 Gordon River Lane and is further described as Lot 16, Nature Pointe, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commission District 4 (2025-2756) 3.C. Petition No. VA-PL20240001811 – 239 Bayfront Drive - Request to reduce the required Front Yard setback from 27.83 feet to 12 feet and to reduce the required Rear Yard setback from 30 feet to 27.07 feet for a single-family residential dwelling pursuant to Sections 10.5.B and 10.5.F of the Lely Barefoot Beach Planned Unit Development (PUD), Ordinance 77-48, As Amended, for property located at 239 Bayfront Drive in Section 06, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commission District 2 (2025-2774) 4. New Business 5. Old Business 6. Public Comments 7. Adjourn Page 2 of 271 9/11/2025 Item # 3.A ID# 2025-2524 Petition No. DR- PL20240009817 – Calida Ventures, LLC – 2934 Tamiami Trail East - Request for approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks three deviations: (1) from LDC Section 4.02.16.A.1.a.ii to instead allow for a maximum front setback of 53’ along US 41/Tamiami Trail East; (2) from LDC Section 4.02.16.A.1.a.ii to instead allow for a maximum Front setback of 70.1’ along Bayshore Drive; (3) from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4 to instead allow for a gradual reduction in width of a portion of the perimeter landscape buffer from 20’ to 18.9’ as shown on the Site Plan with Deviations, consisting of ±1.92 acres and located at 2934 Tamiami Trail East, in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Planner III] Commissioner District 4 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report - Huey Magoos DR 2. Attachment A - Huey Magoos Site Plan with Deviations - Revised 6-13-2025 - to be adopted with HEX decision 3. Attachment B - List of Deviations - to be adopted with HEX decision 4. Attachment C - Building Permit #99-14 5. Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials 6. Attachment E - Hearing Advertising Signs Page 3 of 271 Huey Magoos - DR-PL20240009817 Page 1 of 9 Revised: August 21, 2025 STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2025 SUBJECT: HUEY MAGOOS, SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS, DR-PL20240009817 ______________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/CONTRACT PURCHASER/AGENT: Property Owner: Contract Purchaser: NNN TRS, Inc. Chad Grimm, Managing Member 450 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 900 Calida Ventures, LLC Orlando, FL 32801 2430 Vanderbilt Beach Rd, Suite 108-716 Naples, FL 33109 Agent: Richard DuBois, P.E. RDA Consulting Engineers 791 10th St S., Suite 302 Naples, FL 34102 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant requests that the Collier County Hearing Examiner consider an application for Site Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment (DR) for a reconstruction project for a proposed Huey Magoos restaurant. To better facilitate this reconstruction project, the petitioner requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks three total deviations, including two deviations from LDC Section 4.02.16.A.1.a.ii, to allow for a maximum front setback of 53’ along US 41/Tamiami Trail East and allowing for a maximum side setback of 70.1’ along Bayshore Drive; one deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4, to allow for a gradual reduction in width of a portion of the perimeter landscape buffer from 20’ to 18.9’ with enhanced buffer material consisting of: 4 Pygmy Date Palm trees (Triple plantings with an Page 4 of 271 Huey Magoos - DR-PL20240009817 Page 2 of 9 Revised: August 21, 2025 average height between 5 to 6 feet) as shown on the Site Plan with Deviations for the redevelopment of the existing vacant convenience store/gas station into a restaurant consisting of 1.92± acres. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 2934 Tamiami Trail East, in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida (See location map page 3). PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Currently, the site is occupied by a vacant convenience store/gas station building, which was constructed under Building Permit #99-14. (See Attachment C) The gas station was built in 1999 with a 1,860 SF convenience store, six associated gas pumps, and an associated canopy. It is important to note that Building Permit #99-14 also included the approval of a 5,259 SF automotive service building (Voigts Service Center) located at the southern portion of the parcel, which is not subject to this petition and shall remain existing. The certificate of occupancy (CO) for all structures under Building Permit #99-14 was issued February 8, 2000. The developer will only be redeveloping the northern portion of the parcel, which includes the vacant 1,860 SF convenience store, six associated gas pumps, and an associated canopy. The proposed DR site plan for Huey Magoos includes a 2,277 SF building and an 869 SF patio, drive-thru, and associated site infrastructure. (See Attachment A) This reconstruction project will further redevelop and enhance the subject property. The property is zoned General Commercial- Bayshore Zoning Overlay District-Neighborhood Commercial, C-4-BZO-NC. This DR application requests deviations from setbacks and a landscape buffer. (See List of Deviations - Attachment B) As stated, the existing convenience store/gas station was developed and approved under Building Permit #99-14. Due to Code changes, the portions of the site the applicant wishes to maintain do not meet current LDC provisions. The applicant's site plan, including deviation requests, is detailed in the deviation section below. A summary is provided here. 1. Reduction of the front yard setback along US 41/Tamiami Trail East from a minimum front setback of 5’ and a maximum front setback of 20’ to 53’ for the proposed restaurant. 2. Reduction of the front yard setback along Bayshore Drive from a minimum front setback of 5’ and a maximum front setback of 20’ to 70.1’ for the proposed restaurant. 3. Reduction of the width of the landscape buffer to allow for a gradual reduction in width of a portion of the perimeter landscape buffer from 20’ to 18.9’ with enhanced buffer material consisting of: 4 Pygmy Date Palm trees (Triple plantings with an average height between 5 to 6 feet) as shown on the Site Plan with Deviations. Page 5 of 271 Huey Magoos - DR-PL20240009817 Page 3 of 9 Revised: August 21, 2025 Page 6 of 271 Huey Magoos - DR-PL20240009817 Page 4 of 9 Revised: August 21, 2025 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the boundaries of the subject property, which is currently developed with a vacant convenience store/gas station and is zoned General Commercial-Bayshore Zoning Overlay District-Neighborhood Commercial, C-4-BZO-NC: North: Tamiami Trail East (six-lane arterial), then developed commercial, with a current Zoning designation of Miller Square (PUD) East: Developed commercial, with a current zoning designation of Commercial Intermediate-Gateway Triangle Zoning Overlay District, Commercial Mixed-Use Sub-District, C-3-GTZO-MXD South: Developed commercial, with a current zoning designation of General Commercial- Bayshore Zoning Overlay District, Neighborhood Commercial Sub-District, C-4- BZO-NC West: Bayshore Drive (four lane arterial), then developed commercial, with a current zoning designation of General Commercial-Gateway Triangle Zoning Overlay District, Commercial Mixed Use Sub-District, C-4-GTZO-MXD Source: Collier County Property Appraiser Page 7 of 271 Huey Magoos - DR-PL20240009817 Page 5 of 9 Revised: August 21, 2025 APPLICANT’S JUSTIFICATIONS FOR REQUESTED DEVIATIONS: The petitioner is seeking three deviations from the requirements of the Land Development Code (LDC). The deviations are listed below with staff analysis and recommendations. Proposed Deviation #1: (Front setback – Northern property line to restaurant) “Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC 04.02.16.A.1.a.ii. Table 1, which requires a “minimum Front Setback of 5 feet and a maximum Front setback of 20 feet”, to instead allow for a maximum front setback of 53’ along US 41/Tamiami Trail East.” Petitioner’s Justification: Per the boundary and topographic survey there is an 53 feet front yard setback between the northeast corner of the building and the property line along US-41 / Tamiami Trail. Per record information the property was constructed under SDP Permit Number 99-014 (Voight’s Texaco II) which was approved in May 1999. Sheet 2 of 5 of the aforementioned plan set denotes at the Front yard setback the time of approval as 50’, which is 30’ more than today’s LDC code section 04.02.16.A.1.a.ii. Table 1. We are proposing to maintain the existing setback of 53 feet. This would allow the project to provide a drive-through lane in line with Huey Magoo’s standards while maintaining existing vehicular circulation on the property. Additionally, by maintaining the current setback, the site can provide a drive aisle around the building to meet the stacking requirements. Please note that the existing building is currently being remodeled. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Therefore, Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation as the applicant seeks to retain existing site conditions that were approved in 1999. Proposed Deviation #2: (Front setback – Western property line to restaurant) “Deviation 2 seeks relief from LDC 04.02.16.A.1.a.ii. Table 1, which requires a “minimum Front Setback of 5 feet and a maximum Front setback of 20 feet”, to instead allow for a maximum front setback of 70.1’ along Bayshore Drive.” Petitioner’s Justification: Per the boundary and topographic survey there is an 70.1 feet front yard setback between the northwest corner of the building and the property line along Bayshore Drive Per record information the property was constructed under SDP Permit Number 99-014 (Voight’s Texaco II) which was approved in May 1999. Sheet 2 of 5 of the aforementioned plan set denotes at the Front yard setback the time of approval as 50.0’, which is 30’ more than today’s LDC code section 04.02.16.A.1.a.ii. Table 1. We are proposing to maintain the existing setback of 71 feet. This would allow the project to provide a drive-through lane in line with Huey Magoo’s standards while maintaining existing vehicular circulation on the property. Additionally, by maintaining the current setback, the site can provide a drive aisle around the building to meet the stacking requirements. Please note that the existing building is currently being remodeled. Page 8 of 271 Huey Magoos - DR-PL20240009817 Page 6 of 9 Revised: August 21, 2025 Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Therefore, Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation as the applicant seeks to retain existing site conditions that were approved in 1999. Proposed Deviation #3: (Perimeter landscape buffer – Northern property line) “Deviation 3 seeks relief from LDC 04.06.02.C.4., which requires a “developments within an activity center shall provide a perimeter landscape buffer of at least 20 feet in width regardless of the right-of way width” to instead allow for a gradual reduction in width of a portion of the perimeter landscape buffer from 20’ to 18.9’ with enhanced buffer material consisting of: 4 Pygmy Date Palm trees (Triple plantings with an average height between 5 to 6 feet) in the existing space available as shown on the Site Plan with Deviations.” Petitioner’s Justification: Per the boundary and topographic survey, there is a portion of the landscape buffer along US-41 / Tamiami Trail where the buffer width decreases from 20 feet wide down to 18.9 feet wide. Per the record information the property was constructed under SDP Permit Number 99-014 (Voight’s Texaco II) which was approved in May 1999. Based on the existing aerials provided by google earth and building permits approved after the SDP the landscape buffer along US-41 has never provided the required width by the LDC. We are proposing to significantly improve the existing landscape buffer along US-41 / Tamiami Trail. Although the buffer width decreases by 1.1’ along a portion of US-41/Tamiami Trail, the enhanced buffer consists of the required buffer material plus 4 Pygmy Date Palm trees (Triple plantings with an average height of 5 to 6 feet’). The limited depth of the property required relief from the current Land Development Code to redevelop the site to provide the corporate standards of Huey Magoo’s while maintaining on-site vehicular circulation. This will create a more aesthetically pleasing development for the surrounding area. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Landscaping and Zoning staff have evaluated the proposed deviation to the site plan and found no issue with consistency. Therefore, Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation as the applicant seeks to retain existing site conditions that were approved in 1999. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the request against the established criteria for Site Plans with Deviations under LDC Section 10.02.03.F.7, and provides the analysis below. a. Land uses and densities within the development shall be consistent with the permitted and approved conditional uses in the zoning district. Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the “Surrounding Land Use and Zoning” portion of this report. The proposed deviations will not change the permitted land uses and densities within the development. Page 9 of 271 Huey Magoos - DR-PL20240009817 Page 7 of 9 Revised: August 21, 2025 b. The proposed development is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Staff is of the opinion that the project, as proposed, will remain consistent with GMP FLUE Policy 5.4, requiring the project to be compatible with neighborhood development. Staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. The petition can also be deemed consistent with the CCME and the Transportation Element. Therefore, staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the GMP, because uses are not changing with this amendment. c. The development shall have a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established and upon the unincorporated area as a whole. The proposed deviations will not change the permitted land uses and densities within the development. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed improvements will have a beneficial effect on the surrounding neighborhood and unincorporated Collier County for this currently developed property. d. The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each functional portion of the development shall be adequate to serve its intended purpose The proposed deviations will not change the current land area within the development and are adequate to serve the intended purpose. e. Streets, utilities, drainage facilities, recreation areas, sizes and yards, architectural features, vehicular parking and loading facilities, sight distances, landscaping, and buffers shall be appropriate for the particular use involved. The proposed project is to redevelop the site that includes a 2,277 SF restaurant building and an 869 SF patio, drive-thru, and associated site infrastructure. This reconstruction project will further redevelop and enhance the subject property and will function the same. Staff is of the opinion that these deviations will meet the purpose and intent of the LDC regulations. f. Visual character of the project shall be equal or better in quality than that required by the development standards for the zoning district. The visual character of the project shall be better in quality than the existing project before redevelopment and after it was first permitted. The proposed project will be to redevelop the site with a 2,277 SF restaurant building and an 869 SF patio and drive-thru. The visual character of the project site will be better in quality than the existing project site. Page 10 of 271 Huey Magoos - DR-PL20240009817 Page 8 of 9 Revised: August 21, 2025 g. Areas proposed for common ownership shall be subject to a reliable and continuing maintenance guarantee. At the time of the Site Development Plan Amendment and Building Permit processing, the proposed development improvement is subject to reliable and continuing maintenance requirements as well as standard confirmation and authorization of common ownership(s). h. Deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition and shall be the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project and comply with these standards. Staff finds that the deviations are clearly delineated and is the minimum required to achieve the goals of the gas station redevelopment project. i. The petitioner has provided enhancements to the development. The proposed redevelopment has proposed additional enhancements to the property through the installation of a significant amount of new landscaping and by installing new street walls along the parking areas adjacent to US 41 and Bayshore Drive. Additionally, four Pygmy Date Palms trees (Triple plantings with an average height of 5 to 6 feet) will be installed in the area where the reduction of the landscape buffer occurs along US-41/Tamiami Trail. j. Approval of the deviation(s) will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties. Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the “Surrounding Land Use and Zoning” portion of this report. Furthermore, based on the information provided in the application, the proposed deviations are requested to maintain the existing conditions at the site. The project will not adversely affect adjacent properties. Landscape Review: The Landscape Review Division provided their review in the Deviations section of the report. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the Land Development Code (LDC) Deviations proposed. The proposed deviations do not cause transportation-related issues, consistent with the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Therefore, Transportation Planning staff find the petition consistent with the GMP. At the time of Site Development Plan (SDP) permitting a full TIS will be required that includes operational analysis of all trips resulting from the new proposed use and the impacts on the adjacent road network. Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition and recommends approval of this LDC request deviations. Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition. The request is to remodel the existing building (restaurant) with deviations for building setback and landscaping requirements (buffers). Preservation of native vegetation is not required since the property has been developed and does not contain a preservation area or listed species. This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC Page 11 of 271 Huey Magoos - DR-PL20240009817 Page 9 of 9 Revised: August 21, 2025 scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the proposed petition. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff have determined this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site is not required to set aside a preserve area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve Huey Magoos, Site Plan with Deviations, DR-PL20240009817, with the following condition: 1. Huey Magoos, Site Plan with Deviations, shall be limited to that which is depicted on the “Huey Magoos – Site Plan with Deviation – Revised 6-13-2025,” prepared by Richard B. DuBois, P.E. of RDA Consulting Engineers. Attachments: A. Huey Magoos Site Plan with Deviations – Revised 6-13-2025 – to be adopted with HEX decision B. List of Deviations – to be adopted with HEX decision C. Building Permit #99-14 D. Application/Backup Materials Page 12 of 271 DEVIATION SUMMARY TABLEDEVELOPMENT STANDARDSREQUIREDPROVIDEDLEGENDEXISTING GROUND ELEVATION0SCALE: 1" = 10'20'40'20'NEXISTING FENCERDA CONSULTING ENGINEERS791 10TH STREET SOUTH, SUITE 302NAPLES, FL 34102PHONE: (239) 649-1551FAX: (239) 649-7112WWW.RDAFL.COMALL ELEVATION REFERENCE NAVD88 VERTICAL DATUM.(NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988).RIC H ARDB.DUBOISPROFESSIONALENG INEE RFLORIDA L I CENSENo 93674STATE OFTHIS DOCUMENT WAS DIGITALLY SIGNEDAND SEALED BY RICHARD B. DUBOIS ONTHE DATE LISTED NEXT TO THESIGNATURE. PRINTED COPIES NOTCONSIDERED SIGNED AND SEALED.PLEASE CHECK SIGNATURE AUTHENTICITYFOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES TO BE VALID.US HIGHWAY 41 / SR 90 / TAMIAMI TRAIL E(PUBLIC 120' R.O.W.)BAY SHORE DRIVE(PUBLIC 100' R.O.W.)PROPOSED ASPHALTNOTE1.A POSITIVE DEVIATION FROM STANDARDS REFLECTS PROVIDING A GREATER DISTANCE THAN REQUIREDWHILE A NEGATIVE DEVIATION FROM STANDARDS REFLECTS PROVIDING A LESSER DISTANCE THANREQUIRED.2.MIN/MAX SETBACK PER TABLE 1. "THE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE BZO-NC" FOUND IN 4.02.16.A.1.a.iiOF THE COLLIER COUNTY LDC.3.WIDTH OF LANDSCAPE BUFFER PER SECTION 4.02.16.E.2.iii OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LDC.123333Page 13 of 271 791 10th Street S., Suite 302, Naples, FL 34102 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com List of Deviations: Deviation #1 from LDC Section 04.02.16.A.1.a.ii. Table 1 which requires a “minimum Front Setback of 5’ and a maximum Front setback of 20’” for commercial development to instead allow for a maximum front setback of 53’ along US 41/Tamiami Trail East. Deviation #2 from LDC Section 04.02.16.A.1.a.ii. Table 1 which requires a “minimum Front Street Setback of 5’ and a maximum Front Setback of 20’” for commercial development to instead allow for a maximum side setback of 70.1’ along Bayshore Drive. Deviation #3 from LDC Section 04.06.02.C.4. which requires a “… developments within an activity center shall provide a perimeter landscape buffer of at least 20 feet in width regardless of the right-of way width.” to instead allow for a gradual reduction in width of a portion of the perimeter landscape buffer from 20’ to 18.9’ with enhanced buffer material consisting of: 4 Pygmy Date Palm trees (Triple plantings with an average height between 5 to 6 feet) as shown on the Site Plan with Deviations. Page 14 of 271 Page 15 of 271 Page 16 of 271 Page 17 of 271 Page 18 of 271 Page 19 of 271 Page 20 of 271 Page 21 of 271 Page 22 of 271 Page 23 of 271 Page 24 of 271 Page 25 of 271 Page 26 of 271 Page 27 of 271 Page 28 of 271 Page 29 of 271 Page 30 of 271 Page 31 of 271 Page 32 of 271 Page 33 of 271 Page 34 of 271 Page 35 of 271 Page 36 of 271 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 1/25/2019 Page 1 of 3 SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS FOR REDEVELOPMENT LDC Section 10.02.03 F Ch. 6 I of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): ______________________________________________________ Name of Applicant if different than owner: _________________________________________ Address: _______________________________City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: ______ Telephone: ___________________ Cell: ______________________ Fax: __________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent(s): ______________________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: _______________________________City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: ______ Telephone: ___________________ Cell: ______________________ Fax: __________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ CORRESPONDING SDP, SDPA, SIP INFORMATION This application shall be submitted in conjunction with one of the following: site development plan, site development plan amendment, or site improvement plan. PROJECT NAME/PL # IF KNOWN: ________________________________________________________ PLANNER/PROJECT MANAGER, IF KNOWN: ________________________________________________ DATE OF SUBMITTAL OF SDP/SDPA/SIP: __________________________________________________ To be completed by staff NNN TR, Inc. Calida Ventures, LLC (Managing Member: Chad Grimm) 2430 Vanderbilt Beach Rd, Ste 108-716 Naples FL 34109 904-236-9757 Chad@calidaventures.com Richard DuBois, P.E. RDA Consulting Engineers 791 10th St S., Suite 302 Naples FL 34102 239-649-1551 Richarddubois@rdafl.com Huey Magoo's Restaurant - PL20230016299 - SDPA Stefanie Nawrocki Concurrently with this application Page 37 of 271 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 1/25/2019 Page 2 of 3 INFORMATION REGARDING DEVIATION REQUESTS A site plan with deviations for redevelopment provides a means for a redevelopment project to seek dimensional deviations (excluding height), architectural deviations, and deviations from site features, such as but not limited to, landscaping, parking, and buffers, from the standards established in the LDC when the passing of time has rendered certain existing buildings, structures, or site features nonconforming. A site plan with deviations may be requested for the redevelopment of a site which meets the criteria for a site development plan, site development plan amendment or a site improvement plan as established in LDC section 10.02.03. Except for the requested deviations, the site plan shall comply with LDC section 10.02.03. In accordance with LDC section 10.02.03 F, “redevelopment” shall mean the renovation, restoration, or remodeling of a building or structure, or required infrastructure, in whole or in part, where the existing buildings, structures or infrastructure were legally built and installed. DEVIATION REQUESTS The application must address the follow requirements. Please attach the required narratives and explanations. 1. A narrative of the redevelopment project and how it is consistent with the standards for approval, LDC section 10.02.03 F.7. 2. Description of each requested deviation and justification for each request. Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition. The LDC section for which the deviation seeks relief from shall be identified. 3. Must provide a copy of the building permits and certificates of occupancy for all buildings subject to the DR application to verify the applicable Code at the time of construction. 4. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly identified on the site plan and explanation provided. 5. Deviation Request types: Zoning Deviation Requests - Check all that may be impacted by the request. ❑ Dimensional standards (excluding height):___________________________________________________ ❑ Parking ❑ Architectural ❑ Landscape / Buffers ❑ Other site features: ____________________________________________________________________ Engineering Deviation Requests - Check all that may be impacted by the request. ❑ Stormwater ❑ Pathways ❑ Transportation Planning ❑Other site features: ____________________________________________________________________ X Required Front Street Setback of 5' Min & 20' Max. Proposed front street setback of 53' to US 41 and 70.1' to Bayshore Drive X Page 38 of 271 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 1/25/2019 Page 3 of 3 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Site Development Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment Application 1 Completed SDP/SDPA/SIP application and all associated materials, including all site plan documents. 1 Copy for the Pre-Application Notes, if not submitted with SDP/SDPA/SIP 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Electronic Copy of all documents and plans on CD If application is being submitted as a paper submittal. Not required for electronic submittals. 1 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARNG PROCESS: • At the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated planner. • Please contact the planner to confirm the number of additional copies required. FEE REQUIREMENTS  Site Plan for Redevelopment: $1,000.00  Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department/Zoning Division ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Page 39 of 271 Huey Magoo’s Restaurant Site Plan with Deviations Application - Narrative (PL# 20240009817) Page 1 of 3 791 Tenth Street S, Suite 302, Naples, FL 34102 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com Per the Collier County Land Development Code, Site Plan with Deviations applications must provide a narrative on how the Standards for approval have been achieved. The narrative below addresses how proposed building remodel and parcel redevelopment achieves the following standards outlined in Section 10.02.03.F.7 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Standards for approval and responses: a. Land uses and densities within the development shall be consistent with the permitted and approved conditional uses in the zoning district. Response a: There are no proposed changes to an allowable land use or density proposed within this site plan with deviation application. The purpose of this deviation is to allow for a greater than 20’ setback and a Type ‘D’ Landscape buffer less than 20’ in order to utilize an existing building which will be remodeled into a Huey Magoo’s restaurant. Removing and replacing the existing building was also explored through this design process. In order to provide an adequate stacking lane for vehicles in the drive through, meeting the minimum 5’ and maximum 20’ setback and providing the 20’ wide type ‘D’ landscape buffer along the entirety of US-41 was not possible. b. The proposed development is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Response b: The proposed development is consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The property is located within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Future Land Use area and within a Mixed-Use Activity Center Subdistrict. The proposed Huey Magoo’s restaurant use is consistent with these sections of the Growth Management Plan and the existing building will be substantially remodeled to improve the property. The proposed building remodel and landscape improvements will significantly beautify the corner of US 41 and Bayshore Drive which acts as an entrance to the redeveloping Bayshore Drive area. c. The development shall have a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established and upon the unincorporated area as a whole. Response c: There is a significant benefit to allowing the proposed redevelopment to utilize a setback greater than the allowable maximum of 20’ and not providing a 20’ wide landscape buffer along the entirety of US-41. The proposed site improvements associated with this remodel will transform an existing closed convenience store/gas station into a new Huey Magoo’s restaurant with brand new landscaping, building exterior façade, and stormwater management improvements. In addition, some of the existing mature oak trees are being maintained along the Bayshore Drive and US 41 frontage in order to better buffer the area from the project and additional landscaping is being installed to supplement the existing landscaping. In addition to improving the visual appeal of this existing property, the proposed Huey Magoo’s restaurant will provide additional job opportunities to the area. d. The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each functional portion of the development shall be adequate to serve its intended purpose. Response d: The purpose of this site plan with deviations request is to allow for a deviation to the maximum front street setback requirement of 20’ and a deviation to allow for a portion of the landscape buffer along US- Page 40 of 271 Huey Magoo’s Restaurant Site Plan with Deviations Application - Narrative (PL# 20240009817) Page 2 of 3 791 Tenth Street S, Suite 302, Naples, FL 34102 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com 41 to be less than 20’ wide. The proposed redevelopment is utilizing the existing building to design an efficient site plan which allows for the required functional areas onsite. The most significant functional area to the proposed site plan is the restaurant drive through queue. In order to provide an adequate length queue, it is not possible to meet the minimum setback of 5’ or the maximum setback of 20’ setback and provide a 20’ wide type D landscape along the entirety of US-41. This is why the existing building is being remodeled and redeveloped instead of constructing a brand-new building. e. Streets, utilities, drainage facilities, recreation areas, sizes and yards, architectural features, vehicular parking and loading facilities, sight distances, landscaping and buffers shall be appropriate for the particular use involved. Response e: The proposed streets, utilities, drainage facilities, recreation areas, architectural features, vehicular parking and loading facilities, sight distances, a majority of landscaping and buffers are all appropriate for the type of restaurant business that is being proposed. All of the above items have been designed to meet Collier County Land Development Code and the requirements for development within the Bayshore Gateway Redevelopment Triangle. The only two deviations that are requested is to allow for a setback greater than the 20’ maximum and allow for a portion of the Type D Buffer along US-41 to gradually reduce from 20’ as outlined in the Land Development Code. f. Visual character of the project shall be equal or better in quality than that required by the development standards for the zoning district. The visual character of the project shall be better in quality than the existing project before redevelopment and after it was first permitted. Response f: As the property currently sits today, there is an existing building that was previously used as a convenience store and gas station. This store has been closed for multiple years, and the north portion of the property has not been maintained. The proposed remodel and redevelopment includes remodeling the existing building into a new restaurant with a new interior and exterior façade, installing a significant amount of new landscaping, installing new street walls, and improving the existing stormwater management system. The proposed redevelopment will significantly improve the southeast corner of the intersection of Bayshore Drive and US 41. This parcel is one of the first parcels along the entrance of the Bayshore Drive redevelopment area and the current tenants are excited to significantly improve this parcel and this area. g. Areas proposed for common ownership shall be subject to a reliable and continuing maintenance guarantee. Response g: This standard is noted. There are no areas proposed for common ownership within this deviation application. h. Deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition and shall be the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project and comply with these standards. Response h: Please reference the site plan enclosed within this Site Plan with Deviations application. The enclosed site plan explicitly clouds the proposed setbacks from the remodeled building to the property lines along US 41 and to Bayshore Drive and a gradual reduction of buffer width from 20’ to 18.9’. The proposed deviation is the minimum needed in order to provide the necessary drive through stacking, drive aisle, and stormwater management areas needed for the proposed project. Page 41 of 271 Huey Magoo’s Restaurant Site Plan with Deviations Application - Narrative (PL# 20240009817) Page 3 of 3 791 Tenth Street S, Suite 302, Naples, FL 34102 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com i. The petitioner has provided enhancements to the development. Response i: The proposed redevelopment has proposed additional enhancements to the property though the installation of a significant amount of new landscaping and by installing new street walls along the parking areas adjacent to US 41 and Bayshore Drive. Additionally, 4 Pygmy Date Palms trees (Triple plantings with an average height between 5 to 6 feet) be installed in the area where the reduction of the landscape buffer occurs along US-41/ Tamiami Trail. j. Approval of the deviation will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties. Response j: Approval of this deviation will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties. The current building that will be remodeled is in an existing location that was previously approved under SDP#99-014. The proposed deviations to allow for the existing building to be remodeled and deviate from current Land Development Code which requires a maximum setback of 20’ and provide the 20’ Wide Landscape Buffer along entirety of US-41. Page 42 of 271 $0 $4,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $400,000 $0 Collier County Property Appraiser Summary Parcel ID 71580040001 Site Location 2934 TAMIAMI TRL E, NAPLES 34112 Name / Address NNN TR INC 450 S ORANGE AVE STE 900 City ORLANDO State FL Zip 32801-3339 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5A11 607300 25A11 11 50 25 1.92 Legal ROYAL PALM TERRACE LOTS 1-10 LESS R/W, LOTS 36-42, AND THAT PORTION OF VACATED JOYCE AVE LYING ADJ TO LOTS Sub./Condo 607300 - ROYAL PALM TERRACE Millage Area 63 Use Code 11 - STORES, ONE STORY Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 10/08/09 4502-2431 05/25/07 4234-3520 08/06/01 2871-703 09/18/98 2462-3095 05/18/93 1826-1717 11/01/91 1666-1905 02/01/88 1330-928 2024 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Just Values Amount Land $2,470,802 (+) Improvements $236,303 (=) Total Just $2,707,105 Assessment Reductions Applies To (-) Non-Homestead 10%Non-School $975,776 Assessed Values (=) Non-School Assessed $1,731,329 (=) School Assessed $2,707,105 Taxable Values Millage Rates (=) Non-School Taxable 7.8672 $1,731,329 (=) School Taxable 4.3132 $2,707,105 Tax Amounts Ad Valorem Taxes $25,296.99 (=) Total Tax $25,296.99 Important: Do not rely on current taxes to estimate taxes after a change in ownership. A transfer may significantly affect the taxable value due to loss of exemptions, reset of Save Our Homes or the 10% Cap, and/or market changes. Use our Tax Estimator to estimate taxes under new ownership. Values reflect conditions as of January 1st each year and may differ from the actual tax bill due to millage changes or additional non-ad valorem assessments. For the most accurate and up-to-date tax information, please visit the Collier County Tax Collector ’s Office. 8/5/25, 5:05 PM Collier County Property Appraiser https://www.collierappraiser.com 1/1Page 43 of 271 Page 44 of 271 Page 45 of 271 Page 46 of 271 Page 47 of 271 Page 48 of 271 Page 49 of 271 Page 50 of 271 YQaUW Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 | Emailr GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl'gov www.colliercou ntYfl.gov FROPCNTY OWN [IAS}-II P *?SCLASURE FORf,II This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. lf the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percenta e of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. lf the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the pe of stock owned each: c. lf th rty is in the name of a TRUSTE list the benefici a ries of the trust wit he perce ntage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership % of OwnershipName and Address insert here l0()'( 0€tT SW,e^ #. tfrvn 6o +,t-f '(rt,/r/|(e,tt" tlo,Ul4\f,,€uft vfist k {la"alA"" /t^'ilt I U ,ffLaPl 0Ll2023 Page 1 of 3 Page 51 of 271 Qownty Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (2391 252-1036 | Email; GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov d. lf the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the neral a or limited ners: lf there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the e officers, stockholders, beneficia or rtners: Date of Contract: f. lf any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or offi ifaco ratio artnersh , or trust: g. Date subject property acquired Leased: Ter m or rease ten (1 0) lf, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: years /months % of OwnershipName and Address % of OwnershipName and Address Name and Address T ou2a23 Page 2 of 3 Page 52 of 271 Cawlnty Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (2391 252-L036 | Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov Date of option: Date option terminatest -, oF Anticipated closing date: AFFI RfV! PROPTRTY OW'VERSHIP I FI FOR'VIATIOru Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest-holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the outhorized ogent/appticont for this petition, I ottest thot oll of the informotion indicoted on this checklist is inctuded in this submittal packoge. I understond that failure to include oll necessary submittal information moy result in the delay of processing this petition. NN /V W,T)rc', o ltt\i'rJlh'A cmtorrdtrn (vWWvV er Signature Jon A. Adamo Bxecutive Mce President Agent/Owner Name (please print) Date *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal: https://cvporta l.col liercou ntyf l.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: G M Dclientservices@col I iercou ntyfl.gov ou2023 Page 3 of 3 Page 53 of 271 Page 54 of 271 Page 55 of 271 Page 56 of 271 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETTTTON NUMBERS(S) .lonA.(print name), as Executive Vice President (title, if applicable)9f NNN TRS, lnc (company, if applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) x ownet - applicant - contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and . lf the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." . lf the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. o lf the applicant is a limited partnership, then the generalpartner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnershiP. . lf the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee." . ln each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.9., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/l aUthOfiZg cali;a ventures Lic & RDA consultins Ensineers tO aCt aS OUf/my- ).^_ ;/ representative in an l through 2 above. th;g afiWilr*tlt ts . lf the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. U -. Und and STA er penalties the declare that I have read are true. l/A/Nff{S:,w::n"intfwu it of A ut h o rizati o ntrr^ >'{1a,4" OF AUTHORIZATION WAS ACK ?;y re oF FLORIDA GOUNTY oF gRr$,IGE THE FOREGOING AFFIDAVIT M pHvsrcAl PRESENcE oR- Jon A. Adamo AS NOWLEDGED BEF HB 24AY oF ORE ME BY MEANS OFMoA-flrr+ 2024, BYNE NOTARIZATION T OF NNN TRS, lnc. AS IDENTI F@eo Notary Public - State of [ItORIDA ..tirr'.f9s;'r.. :i+:i. _:,r ':ir.1 .:: lii-ll i-:-Jl.-,.V..::r..- ":J,j;:,:!i"r MARIA KOSTKA MY COMMISSIoN # HH 052274 EXPIRES: November 18, 2024 Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters Printed Name a Kostka (Notary Seal) Page 57 of 271 Page 58 of 271 Page 59 of 271 Page 60 of 271 Page 61 of 271 Page 62 of 271 Page 63 of 271 Page 64 of 271 Page 65 of 271 Page 66 of 271 Page 67 of 271 Page 68 of 271 Page 69 of 271 Page 70 of 271 Page 71 of 271 Page 72 of 271 Page 73 of 271 Page 74 of 271 Page 75 of 271 Page 76 of 271 Page 77 of 271 Page 78 of 271 Page 79 of 271 Page 80 of 271 Page 81 of 271 Page 82 of 271 Page 83 of 271 Page 84 of 271 Page 85 of 271 Page 86 of 271 Page 87 of 271 Page 88 of 271 Page 89 of 271 Page 90 of 271 Page 91 of 271 Page 92 of 271 Page 93 of 271 Page 94 of 271 Page 95 of 271 Page 96 of 271 Page 97 of 271 Page 98 of 271 Page 99 of 271 Page 100 of 271 Page 101 of 271 Page 102 of 271 City of Naples PUBLIC WORKS UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 380 RIVERSIDE CIRCLE ● NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 TELEPHONE (239) 213-5051 ● UTILITIESFORMS@NAPLESGOV.COM Ethics above all else ... Service to others before self ... Quality in all that we do. Page 1 of 2 April 9, 2024 Richard DuBois, P.E. RDA Consulting Engineers 791 10th St S., Suite 302 Naples, FL 34102 RichardDuBois@rdafl.com Subject: Potable Water Service Availability for a restaurant with a drive-through at 2934 Tamiami Trl E, Naples, FL 34112 – Folio #71580040001. Dear Mr. DuBois: In response to the request for a Letter of Availability for potable water service (domestic and /or irrigation use) for the proposed restaurant with drive through project received via email on April 8, 2024. This office has reviewed the subject site for available potable water service. Based on the referenced information and review, this office confirms the following: 1. The subject property is located within the City of Naples potable water service area. 2. The City of Naples has adequate treatment plant capacity for the proposed project. 3. The proposed improvements must meet current City of Naples Utilities Standards and must be submitted to the Utilities Department for review and approval. 4. Should the scope of proposed project change to impact City utility services, the project’s engineer of record shall remain responsible to contact the City for appropriate reviews and analysis. This letter does not imply or guarantee that adequate potable water distribution main facilities of sufficient size and capacity exist at the property; such utilities as may be needed for new site development shall remain the developer’s responsibility to design, permit and construct. Based on the above, this office has no objections to this project subject to appropriate reviews by all utility service providers (including the City of Naples), Collier County, and the Fire District. Should you have any questions or require any additional information or action from this office, please do not hesitate to call this office at (239) 213-5051 or e-mail dmking@naplesgov.com. Page 103 of 271 Ethics above all else ... Service to others before self ... Quality in all that we do. Page 2 of 2 Sincerely, Denise King Utilities Permit Coordinator Cc: Bob Middleton, Utilities Director Michelle Baines, P.E., Deputy Utilities Director David Banter, Utilities Inspector Page 104 of 271 Huey Magoo’s Restaurant Site Plan with Deviations Application – Deviations and Justifications (PL# 20240009817) Page 1 of 2 791 Tenth Street S, Suite 302, Naples, FL 34102 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com Deviation 1: Deviation from LDC 04.02.16.A.1.a.ii. Table 1, Which requires a “minimum Front Setback of 5 feet and a maximum Front setback of 20 feet”, to instead allow for a maximum front setback of 53’ along US 41/Tamiami Trail East. Justification: Per the boundary and topographic survey there is an 53 feet front yard setback between the northeast corner of the building and the property line along US-41 / Tamiami Trail. Per record information the property was constructed under SDP Permit Number 99-014 (Voight’s Texaco II) which was approved in May 1999. Sheet 2 of 5 of the aforementioned plan set denotes at the Front yard setback the time of approval as 50’ which is 30’ more than today’s LDC code section 04.02.16.A.1.a.ii. Table 1. We are proposing to maintain the existing setback of 53 feet. This would allow the project to provide a drive thru lane in line with Huey Magoo’s standards while maintaining existing vehicular circulation on the property. In addition, by maintaining the current setback the site can provide a drive aisle around the building in order to meet the stacking requirements. Please note that the existing building is currently being remodeled. Deviation 2: Deviation from LDC 04.02.16.A.1.a.ii. Table 1, Which requires a “minimum Front Setback of 5 feet and a maximum Front setback of 20 feet”, to instead allow for a maximum side setback of 70.1’ along Bayshore Drive. Justification: Per the boundary and topographic survey there is an 70.1 feet front yard setback between the northwest corner of the building and the property line along Bayshore Drive Per record information the property was constructed under SDP Permit Number 99-014 (Voight’s Texaco II) which was approved in May 1999. Sheet 2 of 5 of the aforementioned plan set denotes at the Front yard setback the time of approval as 50.0’ which is 30’ more than today’s LDC code section 04.02.16.A.1.a.ii. Table 1. We are proposing to maintain the existing setback of 71 feet. This would allow the project to provide a drive thru lane in line with Huey Magoo’s standards while maintaining existing vehicular circulation on the property. In addition, by maintaining the current setback the site can provide a drive aisle around the building in order to meet the stacking requirements. Please note that the existing building is currently being remodeled. Deviation 3: Deviation from LDC 04.06.02.C.4., Which requires a “developments within an activity center shall provide a perimeter landscape buffer of at least 20 feet in width regardless of the right-of way width” to instead allow for a gradual reduction in width of a portion of the perimeter landscape buffer from 20’ to 18.9’ with enhanced buffer material consisting of: 4 Pygmy Date Palm trees (Triple plantings with an average height between 5 to 6 feet) in the existing space available as shown on the Site Plan with Deviations. Justification: Per the boundary and topographic survey there is a portion of the landscape buffer along US-41 / Tamiami Trail where the buffer width decreases from 20 feet wide down to 18.9 feet wide. Per the record information the property was constructed under SDP Permit Number 99-014 (Voight’s Texaco II) which was approved in May 1999. Based on the existing aerials provided by google earth and building permits approved after the SDP the landscape buffer along US-41 has never provided the required width Page 105 of 271 Huey Magoo’s Restaurant Site Plan with Deviations Application – Deviations and Justifications (PL# 20240009817) Page 2 of 2 791 Tenth Street S, Suite 302, Naples, FL 34102 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com by the LDC. We are proposing to significantly improve the existing landscape buffer along US-41 / Tamiami Trail. Although the buffer width decreases by 1.1’ along a portion of US-41/Tamiami Trail, the enhanced buffer consists of the required buffer material plus 4 Pygmy Date Palm trees (Triple plantings with an average height of 5 to 6 feet’). The limited depth of the property required relief from the current Land Development Code to redevelop the site to provide the corporate standards of Huey Magoo’s while maintaining on-site vehicular circulation. This will create a more aesthetically pleasing development for the surrounding area. Page 106 of 271 L-1S 00°04'02" E 243.42' C. & M.S 89°26'51" W 248.14' M.L-2C-1 N 52°00'56" W 1380.82' M. B.R.S 52°02'01" E 688.02' M.1. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. NO EXAMINATION OF TITLE MADE BY SURVEYOR.THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT ABSTRACTED FOR EASEMENTS OR OTHER RECORDEDENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAT.2. THIS CERTIFICATION IS ONLY FOR THE LANDS DESCRIBED. IT IS NOT A CERTIFICATION OFTITLE, ZONING, EASEMENTS OR FREEDOM FROM ENCUMBRANCES OWNERSHIP, ORRIGHTS-OF-WAY.3. UNDERGROUND PORTIONS OF FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WERENOT LOCATED. WALL TIES ARE TO THE FACE OF THE WALL AND ARE NOT TO BE USED TORECONSTRUCT BOUNDARY LINES.4. NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE & ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSEDSURVEYOR AND MAPPER. ONLY VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS LOCATED.5. THIS SURVEY IS INTENDED FOR USE BY THOSE TO WHOM IT IS CERTIFIED.6. ONLY IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN WERE LOCATED. FENCE OWNERSHIP NOT DETERMINED.7. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. NO EFFORT WAS MADE TO PROVE PLATBOUNDARIES.8. PARCEL SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND RIGHT-OF-WAYS OFRECORD.9. WHEN LOCATION OF EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD, OTHER THAN THOSE ONRECORD PLATS, IS REQUIRED, THIS INFORMATION MUST BE FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYORAND MAPPER. PER FLORIDA STATUTE 5J-17.052 (2)4(d)4 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVECODE.10. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNINGPARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY ORPARTIES.11. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY FLOOD ZONEINFORMATION AND BUILDING RESTRICTIONS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION.12. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON N.A.V.D. 1988.I hereby certify that A Survey of the hereon described property wasmade under my direction and meets the Minimum Technical Standardsas per Chapter 5J-17.051 & .052 F.A.C., pursuant to section 472.027,Florida Statutes.Professional Surveyor and Mapper PSM No. 6348 State of FloridaKENNETH SARRIONLots 5 – 10, inclusive (Subject to the Kelly Road Right-of-way over and moss the Westerly 25 feet thereof), and Lots 36 –42, inclusive and including that portion of the abandoned Joyce Avenue which lies between and is contiguous to the:above lots, all being located in ROYAL PALM TEBWACE SUBDIVISION, UNIT 1, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 35, ofthe Pubic Records of Collier County, Florida;ANDLot 3, UNIT ONE, ROYAL PALM TERRACE, UNIT 1, according to the plat recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 35, of thePublic Records of Collier County, Florida, Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, and including any portion ofthat part of the abandoned Joyce Avenue contiguous thereto, EXCEPT that part which lies within 41 feet of the Baselineof Survey according to the Right-of-way Map of Section 03010-21 16 State Road 90, as filled in Map Book 1, Page 92, inthe office of Clerk of Circuit Court, Collier County, Florida,ANDAll that part of Lot 1 and Lot 2, ROYAL PALM TERRACE SUBDIVISION, UNIT 1, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 35,of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, LESS that property conveyed to the State of Florida for RoadRight-of-way which lies within 41 feet of the baseline of the survey according to the right-of-way map section 03010-21 16,State Road 90, as filled in Map Book 1, Page 92, in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, Collier County, Florida;ANDLot 4 of ROYAL PALM TERRACE SUBDIVISION, UNIT 1, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 35, of the Public Records ofCollier County, Florida, and including that part of abandoned Joyce Avenue contiguous thereto, LESS the West 25 feet ofRoad Right-of-way.Property Address:Property Description as Furnished:Flood Certification Information:Surveyors Notes:Community Number: 120067Panel: 0394 Suffix: JEffective Date: 02/08/2024Flood Zone: AE BFE: 9' N.A.V.D. 19882934 Tamiami Trail EastNaples, FL 34112LAND SERVICES, INC.ENCHMARKBABBREVIATIONSCertified To:NN TR INCLOT 10LOT 9LOT 8LOT 7LOT 6LOT 5LOT 4LOT 42LOT 41LOT 40LOT 39LOT 36LOT 37LOT 38LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3JOYCE AVENUE (VACATED)O.R. BOOK 173 PAGE 826245' D.L-2= N 00°00'56" W 345.12' C.N 00°04'29" W 344.92' M.FND. 4"x4" CONC. MON.LB3653 @ N.W. CORNEROF PARCEL NO. 59940902523FND. 5/8"I.R. NO I.D.@ P.I. OF R/W'SBAMBOO DRIVEEAST R/WTAMIAMI TRAIL EAST(IMPROVED) 120' R/W (D.)BAYSHORE DRIVE(IMPROVED) 100' R/W (D.)SOUTH R/WS 52°00'56" E 687.92' C.L-1= S 52°00'56" E 220.29' C.S 51°57'35" E 220.20' M.50.47'51.26'77.96'77.97'133.19'71.17'71.17'125.27'46.19'52.49'70.16'70.41'29.7'28.7'33.3'29.9'1.3'25.4'29.3'34.3'29.4'26.6'6.0'21.5'6.0'8.9'1.0'0.7'0.3'0.3'52.5'35.6'47.4'5.0'10.1'10.0'5.0'30.6'ONE STORYBUILDINGF.FL. ELEV.= 7.78'ONE STORYBUILDING#2934F.FL. ELEV.=7.35'LESS AND EXCEPT 25'FOR R/WSEWER C/OSEWER C/OM.H.M.H.CATV.F.O. SET PKN.&D. LB7502TBM #1ELEV.= 4.72'SET PKN.&D. LB7502TBM #2ELEV.= 4.96'TRAFFIC SIGNALUTILITIESM.H.M.H.M.H.SIGN17.89'15.37'M.H.CONC.CONC.CONC.CONC.CONC.BRICK MEDIANBRICK MEDIANLANDSCAPED MEDIANBRICK MEDIANBRICK MEDIANBRICK MEDIANBRICK MEDIAN2' C.V.G.2' C.V.G.2' C.V.G.2' C.V.G.ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTCONCRETEBRICK WALKBRICK WALKCONC. WALKCONC. WALKCONC. WALKBUS STOPCURBCURBCURBCURBCURBCURBGENERATOR0.00' N.0.60' E.FENCE59.37' S.0.81' E.FENCE33.54' S.1.09' E.RET. WALL0.66' S.74.11' E.FENCE7.6'2' C.V.G.2' C.V.G.PEDESTRIANCROSSWALK SIGNALSW.M.(2)CATV.F.O.S.D. TOP: 4.38'S.D. INV. -0.35'S.D. RIM: 6.00'S.D. INV. 2.46'S.D. RIM: 5.87'S.D. INV. 2.70'S.D. RIM: 7.18'S.D. INV. 1.89'CATV.TEL.O.H.L.O.H.L.O.H.L.G.A.UTILITYVAULT10' U.E.10' U.E.10' U.E. PER O.R. 3074, PG. 3074O.R. 1443 PG. 190215' U.E. PERO.R. 1443 PG. 190215' U.E. PEREAST R/W82836.6 SQ. FT.1.90 ACRESSUBJECT PARCELELEV.= 7.81'BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON A PLATTED BEARING OF N 52°00'56" W FOR THE SOUTH R/W OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST.LOT 11LOT 43FND. 5/8"I.R. ILLEG.FND. 5/8"I.R. NO I.D.ELEV.= 4.44'INV.= -0.27'ELEV.= 4.15'M.H.ELEV.= 4.44'ELEV.= 4.28'INV.= -0.00'O.H.L.SET 1/2"I.R. LB#7502SET 1/2"I.R. LB#7502SET PKNLB#7502IN SIDEWALKCONCRETEINV.= -0.17'RETENTION AREAOF SWALELC(SEALED BY ASPHALT)S.D. RIM: 6.12'S.D. INV. 4.38'ELEC.ASPHALTASPHALTELEV.= 5.56'INV. E.= 0.53'INV. S.= 0.68'INV. N.= 0.74'ASPHALTASPHALTPARCEL NO. 59940902523PARCEL NO. 61834840006Page 107 of 271 DEVIATION SUMMARY TABLEDEVELOPMENT STANDARDSREQUIREDPROVIDEDLEGENDEXISTING GROUND ELEVATION0SCALE: 1" = 10'20'40'20'NEXISTING FENCERDA CONSULTING ENGINEERS791 10TH STREET SOUTH, SUITE 302NAPLES, FL 34102PHONE: (239) 649-1551FAX: (239) 649-7112WWW.RDAFL.COMALL ELEVATION REFERENCE NAVD88 VERTICAL DATUM.(NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988).RIC H ARDB.DUBOISPROFESSIONALENG INEE RFLORIDA L I CENSENo 93674STATE OFTHIS DOCUMENT WAS DIGITALLY SIGNEDAND SEALED BY RICHARD B. DUBOIS ONTHE DATE LISTED NEXT TO THESIGNATURE. PRINTED COPIES NOTCONSIDERED SIGNED AND SEALED.PLEASE CHECK SIGNATURE AUTHENTICITYFOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES TO BE VALID.US HIGHWAY 41 / SR 90 / TAMIAMI TRAIL E(PUBLIC 120' R.O.W.)BAY SHORE DRIVE(PUBLIC 100' R.O.W.)PROPOSED ASPHALTNOTE1.A POSITIVE DEVIATION FROM STANDARDS REFLECTS PROVIDING A GREATER DISTANCE THAN REQUIREDWHILE A NEGATIVE DEVIATION FROM STANDARDS REFLECTS PROVIDING A LESSER DISTANCE THANREQUIRED.2.MIN/MAX SETBACK PER TABLE 1. "THE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE BZO-NC" FOUND IN 4.02.16.A.1.a.iiOF THE COLLIER COUNTY LDC.3.WIDTH OF LANDSCAPE BUFFER PER SECTION 4.02.16.E.2.iii OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LDC.123333Page 108 of 271 Page 109 of 271 Page 110 of 271 9/11/2025 Item # 3.B ID# 2025-2756 Petition No. BD-PL20240009955 - 1609 Gordon River -Request for a 13-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways 100 feet or greater in width, to allow a boat docking facility protruding a total of 33 feet into a waterway that is 122± feet wide, pursuant to LDC Section 5.03.06.H. The subject property is located at 1609 Gordon River Lane and is further described as Lot 16, Nature Pointe, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commission District 4 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report 08192025 2. Attachment A - Proposed Site and Dock Plans 3. Attachment B - Map of Specific Purpose Survey 4. Attachment C - PLAT - Nature Pointe-PB20_PG20-21 5. Attachment D - Applicant's Backup - Application and Supporting Documents 6. Attachment E - Public Hearing Sign Posting 08262025 Page 111 of 271 Page 1 of 8 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2025 SUBJECT: BD-PL20240009955, 1609 GORDON RIVER LANE – KRUKOW DOCK _________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: Eric J. and Heather D. Krukow Jeff Rogers 1609 Gordon River Ln. Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Naples, FL 34104 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner the Hearing Examiner to approve a 13-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways 100 feet or greater in width, to allow a new boat docking facility protruding a total of 33 feet into a waterway that is 122± feet wide, pursuant to LDC Section 5.03.06.H. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 1609 Gordon River Lane, further described as Lot 16, Nature Pointe, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property is located within a residential component of the River Reach Planned Unit Development (PUD), Ordinance 85-71, as amended. The PUD document only references private docks as being an allowable accessory use in conjunction with a single-family residence; therefore, setbacks default to the LDC, Ordinance 04-41, as amended. Said property is improved with a single- family dwelling that has been homesteaded and comprises 0.22 acres and has 75 feet of waterfrontage. The existing dock facility has been damaged by recent hurricanes, and the petitioner desires to replace it with one designed to accommodate a single 30-foot vessel. (Continued on Page 4) Page 112 of 271 Page 2 of 8 Page 113 of 271 Page 3 of 8 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: Single-family dwelling within Tract M-1 of the River Reach PUD East: Gordon River Lane (Right-of-Way) then Tract P (Park)/Preserve area located within the River Reach PUD South: Single-family dwelling within Tract M-1 of the River Reach PUD West: Golden Gate Canal, located within an Agricultural (A) Zoning District, followed by the Gordon River Greenway that is located within a Public (P) Zoning District. Aerial – Collier County GIS Remainder of Page Left Blank Page 114 of 271 Page 4 of 8 Aerial – Collier County GIS Purpose/Description of Project (Continued, from page 1) The subject property is located at the northern end of the Gordon River, and the opposite shoreline is located across from the property located within a Conservation Easement. This portion of the Gordon River is located within a Drainage Easement that allows for docks that are not to exceed 25 percent of the width of the waterway. The subject waterway measures 122 feet, MHWL to MHWL. It has been determined that the property line is landward of the MHWL and is therefore the most restrictive point for the measurement of protrusion; however, as proposed, the dock will only protrude 30 feet from the MHWL or 24.59 percent of the waterway. As the waterfront width of the property is 75 feet, side/riparian setbacks are 15 feet, which will be maintained. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. The property is located adjacent to the Gordon River. The proposed docking facilities will be constructed waterward of the existing riprap shoreline. The shoreline does not contain native vegetation. A submerged resources survey provided by the applicant found no submerged resources in the area 200 feet beyond the proposed docking facility (Submerged Resource Survey exhibit sheet 8 of 8). This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council Board (EAC) review because this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Page 115 of 271 Page 5 of 8 STAFF ANALYSIS: In accordance with LDC Section 5.03.06.H., the Collier County Hearing Examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a dock facility extension request based on certain criteria. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve this request, at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria must be met: Primary Criteria: 1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The subject property is located within the residential development area of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). Section 2.03.B.1 specifically calls out private boat docks as a permitted accessory use to single family dwellings; however, no development criteria are provided therefore we default to the LDC. LDC Section 5.03.06.H.1.a. states that the typical number of slips for single-family use should be no more than two. The proposed docking facility consists of installing a floating dock with one boatlift. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner’s application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner’s application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The proposed docking facility is necessary due to the existing on-site water depth conditions, which are unavoidable; therefore, the best option is to propose a slight reconfiguration to allow the applicant to ensure the safest utilization of their dock. In short, there is a large cap rock that lies within the existing slip, which will be partially removed to provide just enough space and depth to ensure access to the slip. The entire rock cannot be fully removed due to its size and the potential effects the removal could have on the shoreline and upland residences. Therefore, it was determined that removing the outer section was the only feasible option to provide access and allow for full functionality of the slip/boatlift.” Zoning staff concurs. 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel, thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The proposed docking facility design is similar to other docks along the subject and adjacent waterways, but would protrude out slightly further than most. This additional protrusion is being proposed due to the existing on-site conditions as outlined within Primary Criteria 2. As proposed, the dock and boatlift will not create new impacts to existing navigation within the subject waterway, nor will it alter the existing ingress/egress to either adjacent neighboring dock. The subject waterway is unmarked; therefore, the entire waterway provides safe navigation between the docking Page 116 of 271 Page 6 of 8 facilities and the adjacent shoreline. It is our opinion, as proposed, that there are no new impacts to existing navigation, as there are other more restrictive points all passing vessels have to navigate along the subject waterway.” Zoning staff concurs. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion not met. The applicant’s agent states: “The approximate waterway width is 122- foot wide from MHWL to MHWL. The proposed dock protrusion is 33 feet from the most restrictive point, which is the property line on the north end of the property. As proposed, the dock will only protrude 30 feet from the MHWL; therefore, it will be just under the 25% allowed width of the waterway. However, due to the existing waterway conditions associated with vegetation growth, specifically on the CE (west) side encroaching into the waterway, the area open for navigation has been significantly reduced. As proposed, the dock would only leave 40% at best open for navigation, but due to the waterway being an idle speed zone and that no new docks will ever be built on the western shoreline, it is our opinion the dock will not have any effect on safe navigation.” Zoning staff concurs. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The proposed docking facility design is consistent with the previously existing docking facility and other neighboring docks on the surrounding waterways. As proposed, the dock will be within the allowable buildable area by providing the required setbacks, and therefore, as proposed, there will not be any new impacts nor interference to either adjacent docking facility.” Zoning staff concurs. Secondary Criteria: 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include the type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The subject property shoreline consists of a steep rip-rap shoreline with a large natural caprock that extends out below/past the MHWL, which then requires the dock to extend out past. Additionally, based on the waterway width, maintaining the parallel dock/slip layout is the best option to remain within the allowed 25% width of the waterway and be consistent with the other docks along the subject development shoreline.” Zoning staff concurs. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Page 117 of 271 Page 7 of 8 Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The proposed docking facility has been designed to provide sufficient deck area for routine maintenance, safe access, as well as recreational activities, plus a storage area. The deck area on the landward side of the dock could be considered excessive; however, when you put a kayak with a paddleboard and a dry storage box on the dock, the overall open deck area is still necessary to provide sufficient area for safe access and other activities. The floating dock portion of the dock provides safe access for the family, as well as provides access to the water for recreational activities at all tide levels. As proposed, the overall over-water square footage is 800 sq. feet.” Staff concurs. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property’s linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion met. The subject property has 75 feet of water/canal frontage, and the proposed dock facility has been designed to moor a single 30-foot vessel, which equates to 40 percent of said waterfrontage. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The existing on-site conditions consist of a dock with a boatlift and an associated boatlift canopy, which are all proposed to be replaced upon approval. Additionally, as proposed, the dock has been designed to be constructed within the designated side yard setbacks and is consistent with the other existing boat docks along the subject waterway. Based on this and the fact that this is a boating community, it’s our opinion that there are no new impacts to either adjacent property owners’ current view.” Zoning staff concurs. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(I) of the LDC must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties within 200-feet of the existing dock structure. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.) Criterion is not applicable. Criterion not applicable. The provisions of the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan do not apply to single-family dock facilities except for those within the seawalled basin of Port of the Islands; the subject property is not located within Port of the Islands. Staff analysis finds this request complies with four of the five primary criteria. With respect to the six secondary criteria, one of the criteria is found to be not applicable, and the request meets the remaining five. Page 118 of 271 Page 8 of 8 CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS: None. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved party may appeal such final action. Such an appeal shall be filed per Section 2-88 of the Collier County Code of Ordinances within 30 days of the Decision by the Hearing Examiner. An aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of approval authorization shall be at the owner's own risk. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner APPROVE Petition BDE- PL20240009955, to allow for the replacement of the existing dock facility with one that will protrude up to 33 feet into the waterway and is consistent with the Proposed Site and Dock Plans contained within Attachment A. Attachments: A) Proposed Site and Dock Plans B) Map of Boundary Survey – Proposed Dock Site Plan C) Plat – Nature Pointe – PB20_PG20-21 D) Applicant’s Backup – Application and Supporting Documents E) Public Hearing Sign Posting Page 119 of 271 STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.163287<> LONGITUDE:W -81.782630SITE ADDRESS:<> 1609 GORDON RIVER LN NAPLES, FL 34105Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg LOCATION MAP 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LNLOCATION MAP49-------------------01 OF 09COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF MEXICOGULF OF MEXICO8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTYPage 120 of 271 NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg 1952 HISTORIC AERIAL 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LN1952 HISTORIC AERIAL49-------------------02 OF 09SUBJECTPROPERTYPage 121 of 271 NESW0204080SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,1609 GORDON RIVER LNNAPLESFL34105Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LNEXISTING CONDITIONS49-------------------03 OF 09·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC"11-20-23-1.7'+0.44'75'946122'125'75'125'75'122'122'14' 11'SUBJECT PROPERTYMHWLEXISTING DOCK, LIFTAND CANOPY TO BEVOLUNTARILY REMOVEDMHWLEXISTING RIPRAPRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEGORDON RIVER LN24'22'EXISTING ACCESS STAIRSPage 122 of 271 NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,1609 GORDON RIVER LNNAPLESFL34105Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg PROPOSED DOCK - DIMENSIONS 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LNPROPOSED DOCK - DIMENSIONS49-------------------04 OF 09PROPERTY BOUNDARYEXISTING RIPRAPRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEMHWLRIPARIAN SETBACK LINERIPARIAN SETBACK LINE15'15'30'37'PROPOSED 13'X13'BOAT LIFT122'45'PROPOSEDFLOATINGDOCK·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE:PILE COUNTTYPESIZEQUANTITYWOOD PILE10"12WOOD PILE12"6PILES IN WATER IMPACTS = 12 SF (QTY: 30)REFURBISH RIPRAPPROPOSED SEAWALLAA0633'"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC"11-20-23-1.7'+0.44'75'946122'80080033'PROPOSEDFIXED DOCKEXISTING ACCESSSTAIRS TO REMAIN11'14'5'13'13'4'X16' GANGWAY8'PROPOSED 5'X5'ACCESS DOCK4'X10.5' ALUMINUM RAMPPage 123 of 271 7.87.46.50.20.26.5-1.8-3.1-5.1-5.5-1.9-1.1-0.2-3.8-1.8-1.0-5.2-5.8-4.8-2.2-5.8-7.0-7.0-6.8-6.4-6.1-1.80.0-0.3-1.6-3.8-0.7-1.2NESW051020SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,1609 GORDON RIVER LNNAPLESFL34105Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg PROPOSED DOCK - DEPTHS 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LNPROPOSED DOCK - DEPTHS49-------------------05 OF 09PROPERTY BOUNDARYRIPARIAN LINEMHWLHIGH POINT, POSSIBLELARGE ROCK TO BEDREDGED / BROKEN UPPROPOSEDFLOATING DOCKPROPOSEDFIXED DOCKEXISTING ACCESSSTAIRS TO REMAINPage 124 of 271 -7 . 0 ' -1 . 9 '-5.4'-0.3'03510SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg CROSS SECTION AA 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LNCROSS SECTION AA49-------------------06 OF 09PROPOSEDSEAWALLPROPOSEDFIXEDDOCKGORDON RIVERPROPOSEDFLOATINGDOCKMHW = +0.43' NAVDMLW =-1.60' NAVDALL PILES TO BEWRAPPED FROM 12"ABOVE MHWL TO 6"BELOW SUBSTRATE14' BOAT LIFT5'11'36"REFURBISHRIPRAP WHERECAP ROCK ISN'TAT HIGH SPOTSGEOTEXTILEFABRIC33' PROTRUSION FROMPROPERTY LINEPROPERTYLINEHIGH SPOTCAP ROCKROCK TO BEDREDGED /BROKEN UPPage 125 of 271 NESW0204080SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LNSUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY49-------------------07 OF 09PROPERTY BOUNDARY80'90'10'TYPICAL DIVE TRANSECTNO SEAGRASSES WEREOBSERVED GROWING WITHIN 200FT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECTTRANSECT200' GORDON RIVER LN Page 126 of 271 NESW075150300SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg ADJACENT DOCK 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LNADJACENT DOCK49-------------------08 OF 09PROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPOSEDFIXED DOCKNOTE:THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATEAND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.25'30'23'33'18'26'26'25'22'25'18'31'30'GORDON RIVER LN PARCELS PROVIDED BY COLLIERCOUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISERPage 127 of 271 NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,1609 GORDON RIVER LNNAPLESFL34105Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg WIDTH OF WATERWAY 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LNWIDTH OF WATERWAY49-------------------09 OF 09PROPERTY BOUNDARYRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEMHWLRIPARIAN SETBACK LINERIPARIAN SETBACK LINE15'15'30'86'REFURBISH RIPRAPPROPOSED SEAWALL36'51'48'41'44'44'NOTE:THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATEAND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.48'33'PROPOSEDFLOATINGDOCKPROPOSEDFIXED DOCKPage 128 of 271 Page 129 of 271 Page 130 of 271 Page 131 of 271 Page 132 of 271 Revised 5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information\Job Aides or Help Guides HEARING PACKAGE CHECKLIST A.Backup provided by the County Planner The agent is responsible for all required data included in the digital file of information for the Hearing Examiner (Hex) or the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC). DO NOT ACCEPT DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. MAKE SURE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. PLEASE CONFIRM THE DOCUMENTS ARE IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED IN “BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT.” Planner responsible for providing the County Attorney-drafted Ordinance for PUDs and placing in backup materials. AGENTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE PUD DOCUMENT – STAFF PROVIDES THIS TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WHEN THE ORDINANCE IS DRAFTED FOR A PUD. THE FINAL PUD ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT. [FOR HEX, THE REQUESTED LANGUAGE/ PROPOSED PLAN IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT] B.Backup provided by Applicant: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED BELOW. DO NOT PROVIDE DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. PROVIDE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. IF THE BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT IS IN DISARRAY-MEANING IT IS NOT IN THE PROPER ORDER AND/OR THE APPLICANT PROVIDES MULTIPLE DUPLICATES-THE APPLICANT COULD LOSE ITS HEARING DATE. _X__ Application, to include but not limited to the following: _ X__ Narrative of request _ X__ Property Information _ X__ Property Ownership Disclosure Form _ X__ Any other documents required by the specific petition type; such as a variance, a boat dock extension; PUD amendment, rezone request, etc. _ X__ Disclosure of Property Ownership Interest (if there is additional documentation aside from disclosure form) ____ Affidavit of Unified Control _ X__ Affidavit of Representation Authorization _ X__ Drawings (may include Cross-Section (for BDEs generally), proposed Boat Dock(s) with Water depth, location maps etc.) _ ___ NIM Information (Sign in sheet, notes, minutes and transcript/or summary) Include 3 thumbnail drives of video and/or audio Agent Letter Pkg. ____ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) ____ Environmental Data ____ Historical/Archeological Survey or Waiver ____ Utility Letter _ X__ Deviation Justifications BD-PL20240009955 - 1609 Gordon River Ln Page 133 of 271 Revised 5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information\Job Aides or Help Guides _ X__ Boundary Survey _ X__ Other documents, as needed, on a case-by-case basis such as relevant prior Ordinances, Conditional Uses, historical documents, any “private or legal” agreements affecting the PUD etc. _ X_ Submerged Resource Surveys may be included here if required. _ X __ flash drive with only one pdf file for all documents OR e-mailed .pdf file I understand that by submitting the above materials, it is the agent’s/applicant’s responsibility to ensure all materials are in the same order for flash drive must contain the documents in one pdf file. It is the agent’s responsibility to ensure no documentation is left out. ________________________________________ Signature of Agent Representative Date ________________________________________ Printed Name of Signing Agent Representative _____8/18____/2025 ________ Jeff Rogers Page 134 of 271 Page 135 of 271 Page 136 of 271 Page 137 of 271 Page 138 of 271 Page 139 of 271 Page 140 of 271 Page 141 of 271 Addressing Checklist 6/14/2024 Page 1 of 2 Growth Management Community Development • Operations & Regulatory Management 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • www.colliercountyfl.gov/ Addressing Checklist GMCD Public Portal Land Development Code Administrative Code Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with a * are required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. *Name of Owner/Agent: Firm [if agent]: *Address:*City:*State:*ZIP: *Telephone:Cell:Fax: *E-Mail Address: *Folio (Property ID) Number(s) of the subject property or properties [Attach list if necessary]: *Legal Description of subject property or properties [Attach list if necessary]: Street Address(es) where applicable, if already assigned: Applicant Contact Information Location Information Page 142 of 271 Collier County Addressing Checklist 6/14/2024 Page 2 of 2 Growth Management Community Development • Operations & Regulatory Management 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • www.colliercountyfl.gov/ Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre-approval of project name and/or street name may be requested by contacting us at GMD_Addressing@colliercountyfl.gov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. Current Project Name: Proposed Project Name: Proposed Street Name: Latest Approved Project Number [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include. Checkmark the items included with this application: Requirements for Review: Required: LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. ☒ List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. ☐ E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre-approved project and/or street names.☐ Project Information Submittal Requirement Checklist The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department | GMCD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: Front.Desk@colliercountyfl.gov Page 143 of 271 Page 144 of 271 Page 145 of 271 Page 146 of 271 Page 147 of 271 Page 148 of 271 Page 149 of 271 Page 150 of 271 Narrative Description: The proposed Boat Dock Extension request is to remove the existing dock and boatlift canopy which were basically destroyed in the past hurricanes to affect the area. Once removed the applicant is requesting to then construct a new single-family floating docking facility with one boatlift located at 1609 Gordon River Trail in Collier County. The subject property is situated along the northern end of the Gordon River with numerous other existing single-family docks in the surrounding neighborhoods and associated waterways. Additionally, this section of the Gordon River is developed on the east side by Nature Pointe Community which has the river under a Conservation Easement (CE) that extends westward across the entire waterway. The CE is considered a drainage easement that does allow for docks to be installed within and along the entire development shoreline with the proper entity’s approval. The property to the west just landward of the CE area on the opposite shoreline is part of the Collier County Greenway parcels therefore will never be developed with docks. Based on the property’s existing conditions the most restrictive point is the plated property line which is just on the landward side of the MHWL. Due to those site conditions the proposed docking facility’s overall protrusion will be taken from that point as required within the LDC. As proposed the docking facility will extend out 33 feet from the most restrictive point therefore the subject application is requesting a 13-foot extension from the allowed 20-feet. The subject waterway is approximately 122-feet wide from the MHWL to MHWL as indicated on the attached survey with the 25% width of the overall waterway width being 30.5-feet. With that the proposed dock will be within the allowed 25% width of the waterway when measured from MHWL to MHWL. With the opposite shoreline being naturally vegetated the mangrove fringe is the most restrictive factor on the waterway’s navigation but it’s our opinion that the proposed dock will not have an impact on the existing navigation in this area. As stated above, this shoreline falls within the CE and therefore will never be authorized to construct docks but should be better maintained to ensure safe navigation on this section of the river. Additionally, there are a few more restrictive areas regarding the width of waterway that any vessel ingress/egress south to Naples Bay and north must currently navigate. The dock will accommodate one vessel approximately 30-feet in overall length which will be moored to the dock on the inside slip or on the proposed boatlift. The proposed dock location is being driven by existing water depths as well as remaining within the allowed 25% width of waterway. The applicant is now proposing to remove/dredge the existing high cap rocks within the dock area to allow safe mooring and full functionality of the proposed boatlift. Once the high rock spots are removed there will be sufficient water depths within the slip area allowing for a more shoreline parallel mooring layout. Based on this the decking area was able to be further reduced but still providing sufficient surface area for recreational activities, routine maintenance, and associated storage as the original goal was to design a dock that avoided building or mooring the boat over the Cap Rock area. Overall, as proposed the docking facility will provide the required 15-foot setbacks from each riparian line as required for properties with 60-feet or greater shoreline length. There are no impacts to any submerged resources and no new impacts to adjacent properties as there is an existing dock in place now with a boatlift canopy. The community is a boating community that allows docks for recreational activities, so Page 151 of 271 docks are part of the development which the HOA has reviewed and approved of the proposed dock and provided a letter in support. Finally, the proposed dock design and overall protrusion is consistent with the other previously approved docking facilities on the subject waterway. Page 152 of 271 PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) The subject property is zoned for a single-family residential unit which warrants no more than 2 boat slips per the CC-LDC. The proposed docking facility consists of installing a floating dock with one boatlift to accommodate a 30-foot LOA vessel. As designed the proposed dock meets all the other design criteria within, has been approved by the local HOA, and therefore is appropriate based off the upland use/zoning. Criterion Met 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner’s application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner’s application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) The proposed docking facility is necessary due to the existing on-site water depth conditions which are un-avoidable therefore the best option is to propose the slight reconfiguration to allow for the applicant to ensure the safest utilization of their dock. In short there is a large cap rock that lies within the existing slip which will be partially removed to provide just enough space and depths to ensure access to the slip. The entire rock cannot be fully removed due to its size and the potential effects the removal could have on the shoreline and upland residence. Therefore, it was determined removing the outer section was the only feasible option to provide access and allow for full functionality of the slip/boatlift. This new configuration does require a County BDE but based on the waterway dimensions would not have an impact on the existing navigational conditions for others. Page 153 of 271 Criterion Met 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) The proposed docking facility design is similar to other docks along the subject and adjacent waterways but would protrude out slightly further than most. This additional protrusion is being proposed due to the existing on-site conditions as outlined within Primary Criteria 2. As proposed the dock and boatlift will not create new impacts to existing navigation within the subject waterway, nor will it alter the existing ingress/egress to either adjacent neighboring dock. The subject waterway is unmarked therefore the entire waterway provides safe navigation between the docking facilities and the adjacent shoreline. It is our opinion as proposed that there are no new impacts to existing navigation as there are other more restrictive points all passing vessels have to navigate along the subject waterway. Criterion Met 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) The approximate waterway width is 122-foot wide from MHWL to MHWL. The proposed dock protrusion is 33-feet from the most restrictive point being the property line on the north end of the property. As proposed, the dock will only protrude 30 feet from the MHWL therefore will be just under the 25% allowed width of the waterway. However, due to the existing waterway conditions associated with the vegetation growth specifically on the CE (west) side encroaching out into the waterway has significantly reduced the area open for navigation. As proposed the dock would only leave 40% at best open for navigation but due to the waterway being an idle speed zone and that no new docks will ever be built on the western shoreline it is our opinion the dock will not have any effect on safe navigation. But based on the criteria the proposed dock would NOT meet this criterion. 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Page 154 of 271 The proposed docking facility design is consistent with the previously existing docking facility and other neighboring docks on the surrounding waterways. As proposed the dock will be within the allowed buildable area by providing the required setbacks and therefore as proposed there will not be any new impacts nor interference to either adjacent docking facility. Criterion Met Page 155 of 271 SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) The subject property shoreline consists of a steep rip-rap shoreline with a large natural caprock that extends out below/past the MHWL which then requires the dock to extend out past. Additionally, based on the waterway width maintaining the parallel dock/slip layout is the best option to remain within the allowed 25% width of waterway and be consistent with the other docks along the subject development shoreline. Criterion Met 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) The proposed docking facility has been designed to provide sufficient deck area for routine maintenance, safe access as well as recreational activities plus storage area. The deck area on the landward side of the dock could be considered excessive, however when you put a kayak with a paddleboard and a dry storage box on the dock the overall open deck area is necessary to still provide sufficient area for safe access and other activities. The floating dock portion of the dock provides safe access for the family as well as provides access to the water for recreational activities at all tide levels. As proposed the overall over-water square footage is 800 sq. feet. Criterion Met 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property’s linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) The existing docking facility has been designed to moor one vessel being a 30-foot in length overall. Based off this and with the property’s shoreline length being approximately 75-feet the required 50% of the shoreline will remain open. Criterion met. Page 156 of 271 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) The existing on-site conditions consist of a dock with a boatlift and an associated boatlift canopy which are all proposed to be replaced upon approval. Additionally, as proposed the dock has been designed to be constructed within the designated side yard setbacks and is consistent with the other existing boat docks along the subject waterway. Based off this and the fact this is a boating community it’s our opinion that there are no new impacts to either adjacent property owners’ current view. Criterion Met 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 I must be demonstrated.) Based off our observations there are not any seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties and extending out 200’ of the proposed dock structure. Criterion Met 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) The proposed work is a single-family dock facility and therefore not subject to Manatee Protection Requirements. N/A Page 157 of 271 STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.163287<> LONGITUDE:W -81.782630SITE ADDRESS:<> 1609 GORDON RIVER LN NAPLES, FL 34105Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg LOCATION MAP 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LNLOCATION MAP49-------------------01 OF 09COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF MEXICOGULF OF MEXICO8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTYPage 158 of 271 NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg 1952 HISTORIC AERIAL 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LN1952 HISTORIC AERIAL49-------------------02 OF 09SUBJECTPROPERTYPage 159 of 271 NESW0204080SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,1609 GORDON RIVER LNNAPLESFL34105Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LNEXISTING CONDITIONS49-------------------03 OF 09·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC"11-20-23-1.7'+0.44'75'946122'125'75'125'75'122'122'14' 11'SUBJECT PROPERTYMHWLEXISTING DOCK, LIFTAND CANOPY TO BEVOLUNTARILY REMOVEDMHWLEXISTING RIPRAPRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEGORDON RIVER LN24'22'EXISTING ACCESS STAIRSPage 160 of 271 NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,1609 GORDON RIVER LNNAPLESFL34105Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg PROPOSED DOCK - DIMENSIONS 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LNPROPOSED DOCK - DIMENSIONS49-------------------04 OF 09PROPERTY BOUNDARYEXISTING RIPRAPRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEMHWLRIPARIAN SETBACK LINERIPARIAN SETBACK LINE15'15'30'37'PROPOSED 13'X13'BOAT LIFT122'45'PROPOSEDFLOATINGDOCK·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE:PILE COUNTTYPESIZEQUANTITYWOOD PILE10"12WOOD PILE12"6PILES IN WATER IMPACTS = 12 SF (QTY: 30)REFURBISH RIPRAPPROPOSED SEAWALLAA0633'"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING, INC"11-20-23-1.7'+0.44'75'946122'80080033'PROPOSEDFIXED DOCKEXISTING ACCESSSTAIRS TO REMAIN11'14'5'13'13'4'X16' GANGWAY8'PROPOSED 5'X5'ACCESS DOCK4'X10.5' ALUMINUM RAMPPage 161 of 271 7.87.46.50.20.26.5-1.8-3.1-5.1-5.5-1.9-1.1-0.2-3.8-1.8-1.0-5.2-5.8-4.8-2.2-5.8-7.0-7.0-6.8-6.4-6.1-1.80.0-0.3-1.6-3.8-0.7-1.2NESW051020SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,1609 GORDON RIVER LNNAPLESFL34105Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg PROPOSED DOCK - DEPTHS 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LNPROPOSED DOCK - DEPTHS49-------------------05 OF 09PROPERTY BOUNDARYRIPARIAN LINEMHWLHIGH POINT, POSSIBLELARGE ROCK TO BEDREDGED / BROKEN UPPROPOSEDFLOATING DOCKPROPOSEDFIXED DOCKEXISTING ACCESSSTAIRS TO REMAINPage 162 of 271 -7 . 0 ' -1 . 9 '-5.4'-0.3'03510SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg CROSS SECTION AA 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LNCROSS SECTION AA49-------------------06 OF 09PROPOSEDSEAWALLPROPOSEDFIXEDDOCKGORDON RIVERPROPOSEDFLOATINGDOCKMHW = +0.43' NAVDMLW =-1.60' NAVDALL PILES TO BEWRAPPED FROM 12"ABOVE MHWL TO 6"BELOW SUBSTRATE14' BOAT LIFT5'11'36"REFURBISHRIPRAP WHERECAP ROCK ISN'TAT HIGH SPOTSGEOTEXTILEFABRIC33' PROTRUSION FROMPROPERTY LINEPROPERTYLINEHIGH SPOTCAP ROCKROCK TO BEDREDGED /BROKEN UPPage 163 of 271 NESW0204080SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LNSUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY49-------------------07 OF 09PROPERTY BOUNDARY80'90'10'TYPICAL DIVE TRANSECTNO SEAGRASSES WEREOBSERVED GROWING WITHIN 200FT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECTTRANSECT200' GORDON RIVER LN Page 164 of 271 NESW075150300SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg ADJACENT DOCK 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LNADJACENT DOCK49-------------------08 OF 09PROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPOSEDFIXED DOCKNOTE:THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATEAND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.25'30'23'33'18'26'26'25'22'25'18'31'30'GORDON RIVER LN PARCELS PROVIDED BY COLLIERCOUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISERPage 165 of 271 NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,1609 GORDON RIVER LNNAPLESFL34105Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24011.00 krukow - 1609 gordon river lane\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24011-BDE.dwg WIDTH OF WATERWAY 6/19/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ06-19-2524011-35251609 GORDON RIVER LNWIDTH OF WATERWAY49-------------------09 OF 09PROPERTY BOUNDARYRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEMHWLRIPARIAN SETBACK LINERIPARIAN SETBACK LINE15'15'30'86'REFURBISH RIPRAPPROPOSED SEAWALL36'51'48'41'44'44'NOTE:THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATEAND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.48'33'PROPOSEDFLOATINGDOCKPROPOSEDFIXED DOCKPage 166 of 271 Page 167 of 271 Page 168 of 271 1609 GORDON RIVER LN. NAPLES, FL 34104 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY REPORT OCTOBER 2024 PREPARED BY: Page 169 of 271 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Objective ............................................................................................................................................. 2 3 Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 3 4 Results ................................................................................................................................................. 4 5 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................... 4 6 Photos .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Page 170 of 271 1609 Gordon River Ln. Submerged Resource Survey October 2024 1 1 INTRODUCTION Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. (THA) has conducted a Submerged Resource Survey at a property 1609 Gordon River Ln., Florida 34104 (Folio #63770001127) within Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, in Collier County. The property totals approximately .22 acre in size that can be found on a man-made section off the north end of the Gordon River. The project area consists of a single-family residence with an existing riprap shoreline consistent along the entire subject property development. Additionally, this section of the Gordon River is developed on the east side by Nature Pointe Community which has the river under a Conservation Easement (CE) that extends westward across the entire waterway. The CE is considered a drainage easement that does allow for docks to be installed along the entire development shoreline with the proper entity’s approval. The property to the west just landward of the CE area on the opposite shoreline is part of the Collier County Greenway parcels therefore will never be developed with docks. The SRS was conducted on October 14th, 2024, between approximately 10:15 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. Site conditions consisted of mostly sunny skies and a slight breeze. Water clarity was fair and allowed approximately 8- 12 inches of visibility. The ambient air temperature was approximately 76 degrees Fahrenheit and wind speeds averaged 5-10 miles per hour from the northeast. High tide occurred after the site inspection at approximately 10:30 a.m., reaching 3.3 feet above the mean low water mark. A low tide occurred after the site inspection at approximately 4:52 p.m. and reached approximately 0.4 feet above the mean low water mark. Page 171 of 271 1609 Gordon River Ln. Submerged Resource Survey October 2024 2 2 OBJECTIVE The objective of the SRS is to identify and locate any existing submerged resources within the footprint of the proposed dock. Ordinarily, if seagrasses or other marine resources were present within the vicinity of a project area, an analysis will be required regarding species, percent coverage, and impacts projected by the proposed project. The presence of seagrasses may be ample cause for re-configuration of the design for projects over surface waters to avoid or minimize impacts. The general scope of work performed during a typical submerged resource survey is summarized below: • A series of underwater transects is traversed within and adjacent to the project site in order to investigate for the presence of any submerged resources. • Submerged resources within the survey area will be identified, located as accurately as possible, and an estimate of the percent coverage of any resources found will be made. • The approximate limits of any submerged resources observed will be delineated via a handheld GPS device from the surface over the submerged resources. Page 172 of 271 1609 Gordon River Ln. Submerged Resource Survey October 2024 3 3 METHODOLOGY THA biologists intentionally designed the methodology of the SRS to cover not only the entire property shoreline and footprint for the proposed dock installation but also the adjacent areas ingress/egress to the proposed project. The components utilized for this survey included: • Reviewing aerial photography of the surveyed area. • Establishing survey transect lines (spaced approximately 10 feet apart) overlaid onto aerials (See attached Exhibits). • Physically swimming the transects, GPS locating the limits of any submerged resources found, and determining the percentage coverage within the area. • Documenting and photographing all findings. The surveyed area was evaluated systematically by following the established transect lines throughout the project site as shown on the attached exhibit. The survey extends out approximately 200-feet from the subject property in all directions. Neighboring properties, the existing docking facility as well as the adjacent docks, and other landmarks provided reference markers which assisted in maintaining correct positioning over each transect. During this SRS, one THA staff member swam the transect lines using snorkel equipment while a second remained on the shoreline taking notes and compiling findings on an aerial of the project site. Ordinarily, if any resources are found, they are photographed, GPS located, delineated, and analyzed for percent coverage within the area via a half meter square quadrat. Page 173 of 271 1609 Gordon River Ln. Submerged Resource Survey October 2024 4 4 RESULTS The substrate observed within the surveyed area consisted of silty muck material with large cap rocks throughout with scattered shell and vegetative debris present along the seafloor. Table 1: Observed species of wildlife and vegetation within the vicinity of the project site Common Name Scientific Name Striped Mullet Mugil cephalus Red Mangrove Rhizophora mangle Mud Crab Panopius herbstii 5 CONCLUSION The SRS was conducted along the property’s shoreline and extended out approximately 200 feet into the waterway. No resources other than mangroves were observed within the surveyed area which in our opinion is a result of low salinity levels within this section of the Gordon River. Accordingly, negative impacts to submerged resources are not expected as a result of the proposed project as there are no mangroves nor seagrasses present within the proposed dock footprint. Page 174 of 271 1609 Gordon River Ln. Submerged Resource Survey October 2024 5 6 PHOTOS Figure 2-3: View of silty muck substrate material and shell debris present onsite. Photo 3: Typical view of bottom sediment. Page 175 of 271 1609 Gordon River Ln. Submerged Resource Survey October 2024 1 Page 176 of 271 1 John Kelly From:John Kelly Sent:Wednesday, August 27, 2025 2:24 PM To:John Kelly Subject:BD-PL20240009955 - 1609 Gordon River Ln - Public Hearing Sign Posting 08262025 Attachments:Photo 1.jpg; Photo 2.jpg I, John Kelly, posted a Public Notice sign to the front of the subject property on Tuesday, August 26, 2025, at approximately 1:35 P.M. as depicted within the attached photos. Respectfully, John Kelly Planner III Zoning Office:239-252-5719 2800 N Horseshoe Dr. Naples, Florida 34104 John.Kelly@colliercountyfl.gov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Page 177 of 271 Page 178 of 271 9/11/2025 Item # 3.C ID# 2025-2774 Petition No. VA-PL20240001811 – 239 Bayfront Drive - Request to reduce the required Front Yard setback from 27.83 feet to 12 feet and to reduce the required Rear Yard setback from 30 feet to 27.07 feet for a single-family residential dwelling pursuant to Sections 10.5.B and 10.5.F of the Lely Barefoot Beach Planned Unit Development (PUD), Ordinance 77-48, As Amended, for property located at 239 Bayfront Drive in Section 06, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commission District 2 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report 08222025 2. Attachment A - Legal Description 3. Attachment B - Site Plan 4. Attachment C - Elevations 5. Attachment D - Sketch of Survey 6. Attachment E - ZLTR PL20220001059 7. Attachment F - Applicant's Backup - Application, Narrative, Agent Letter, etc 8. Attachment G - Sign Posting 08262025 Page 179 of 271 VA-PL20240001811; 239 Bayfront Dr Page 1 of 8 08/22/2025 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION- ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2025 SUBJECT: PETITION VA-PL20240001811; 239 BAYFRONT DRIVE _____________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: 239 Bayfront LLC Amy S. Thibaut, Esq. 207 Bayfront Dr. Roetzel & Andress LPA Bonita Springs, FL 34134 2320 First St., Suite 1000 Fort Myers, FL 33901 REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Hearing approve a variance request to reduce the required Front Yard setback from 27.83 feet to 12 feet and to reduce the required Rear Yard setback from 30 feet to 27.07 feet for a single-family residential dwelling pursuant to Sections 10.5.B and 10.5.F of the Lely Barefoot Beach Planned Unit Development (PUD), as per Ordinance 77-48, as amended, to allow for the construction of a new single-family dwelling. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 239 Bayfront Drive; see Attachment A for the full legal description. It is situated in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map below) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner seeks a Variance to allow for the construction of a 3-story over-parking single- family dwelling on a razed, irregularly shaped waterfront property, comprising 0.17 acres. The subject property is located within Tract I, a residential component of the subject PUD for which Development Regulations are detailed within Section 10.5. The building height of the proposed residence is 55.65 feet, from the center of the road to the uppermost peak of the roof. Based on the location and the proposed building height, the required yards for principal structures are: Front Yard - 27.83 feet, Side Yards – 7.5 feet, and Rear Yard – 30 feet. (Continued on page 4) Page 180 of 271 VA-PL20240001811; 239 Bayfront Dr Page 2 of 8 08/22/2025 Page 181 of 271 VA-PL20240001811; 239 Bayfront Dr Page 3 of 8 08/22/2025 Page 182 of 271 VA-PL20240001811; 239 Bayfront Dr Page 4 of 8 08/22/2025 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Little Hickory Bay, located within the Lely Barefoot Beach PUD East: Single-family dwelling located within Tract I of the Lely Barefoot Beach PUD South: Bayfront Drive (Right-of-Way), then Tract M - Mangrove Preserve – of the Lely Barefoot Beach PUD West: Single-family dwelling located within Tract I of the Lely Barefoot Beach PUD Collier County GIS Purpose/Description of Project (Continued from Page 1) To allow for the construction of the proposed single-family dwelling, the petitioner seeks a 15.83- foot variance from the required front yard, thereby reducing it to 12 feet, and a 2.93-foot variance from the required rear yard, thereby reducing it to 27.07 feet as depicted within the provided site plan. Page 183 of 271 VA-PL20240001811; 239 Bayfront Dr Page 5 of 8 08/22/2025 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is located within the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict of the Urban Mixed- Use District on the County’s Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual Variance requests but deals with the larger issue of the actual use. The proposed single-family use is consistent with the FLUM of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual variance requests; the Plan deals with the larger issue of the actual land use. ZONING DIVISION ANALYSIS: The decision to grant a variance is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.04.03. Staff have analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size, and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved? The applicant’s agent states: “Yes. The request is intended to accommodate the environmentally sensitive area and narrow lots. At its absolute widest point at the northeast corner of the Property, including overhangs, the proposed home is just over 40’ wide. Where the Property narrows at the southwest corner, the proposed home is less than 18’ wide. The PUD Ordinance for the Property governs setbacks based on height as well. However, in 2017, the PUD regulations were updated to permit three (3) habitable stories versus the two (2) habitable stories permitted prior. Such increased height allows for more resilient development, but in turn, increases the setbacks for new development in the community compared to those homes developed prior to the 2017 permitted height increase. Therefore, the requested variances are intended to address the unusual and narrow shape of the lot paired with the increased height to allow for the development of a single-family dwelling unit that is consistent with the community and area. With respect to the rear yard, there is an environmentally sensitive area between the proposed building footprint and the water body. These sensitive environmental conditions prohibit the installation of a pool and customary outdoor living areas to the rear of the structure. As a result, these amenities have been designed to be elevated, necessitating a taller overall structure to accommodate the habitable area within the dwelling unit. Due to the resulting increased height, the required setbacks have also increased. As such, the variances requested would allow for setbacks that are consistent with the existing development, while allowing for more elevation of the structures on the Property.” b. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the applicant, such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? The applicant’s agent states: “Yes. The lots were not created by the owner, nor did the owner create the environmental conditions that necessitate the need to elevate the pool away from said lands. The narrow lot Page 184 of 271 VA-PL20240001811; 239 Bayfront Dr Page 6 of 8 08/22/2025 dimensions (discussed above), made more restrictive by the presence of environmentally sensitive lands (also discussed above), necessitate the variance. The Applicant did not create those conditions.” Staff concurs. c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? The applicant’s agent states: “Yes, a literal interpretation of the provisions of the LDC would confer an undue hardship on the Applicants and create numerous practical difficulties. Literal interpretation of the Code would create undue hardship by either eliminating typical residential features, such as the pool and/or bedrooms, to accommodate the more expansive setbacks imposed based on height. Conversely, the approval of the variance would allow for the development of the structure in a manner that is consistent and harmonious with existing development in the community, with no deleterious impacts on the general health, safety and welfare.” Staff concurs. d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure and which promotes standards of health, safety, and welfare? The applicant’s agent states: “Yes, the two (2) requested variances are the minimum variances that will make possible the reasonable use of the Property. As demonstrated on the site plan and dimensional floor plan, the Applicant has proposed a four-bedroom home that would contain approximately 4,600 sq. ft. of habitable area (under air), which is reasonable for the community and surrounding area. The lanais and pool are also customary residential features in both the immediate neighborhood and surrounding area. Thus, the variances requested would allow for the development of the Property in a manner that is consistent and harmonious with the area, which in turn promotes health, safety, and welfare. Absent the variances, the structure could not be as tall as currently proposed, although the proposed height is permitted by right. The loss of height would, in turn, result in the loss of bedrooms (likely two (2) bedrooms of the four (4) proposed), thus making unreasonable use of the Property. Thus, the variances requested are the minimum to make reasonable use of the Property.” Staff concurs. e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? By definition, a Variance bestows some dimensional relief from the zoning regulations specific to a site. LDC Section 9.04.02 allows relief through the Variance process for any Page 185 of 271 VA-PL20240001811; 239 Bayfront Dr Page 7 of 8 08/22/2025 dimensional development standard. As such, other properties facing a similar hardship would be entitled to make a similar request and would be conferred equal consideration on a case-by-case basis. f. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? The applicant’s agent states: “No. The variance would allow the property to be developed in the same manner as other nearby structures, retaining a consistent and harmonious scheme of development within the neighborhood and surrounding area. The location of the waterbody offsets impacts to property owners across the waterbody. The waterbody appears to be approximately 110’ wide at that location, so this additional separation between rear yards offsets any impacts to property owners that may have otherwise resulted from the decrease in rear yard. In the same vein, the parcel located across from the subject property is a preserve area owned by the Bayfront Gardens Association. As such, there are no dwellings or other uses across Bayfront Dr. that would be adversely impacted by the decreased front yard area. The decreased front setback would also not obstruct visibility from Bayfront Dr. and therefore would not be injurious to drivers. This is evidenced by the minimum required front setback of 10’, as well as other similarly situated properties in the neighborhood.” Staff concurs; however, they believe the applicant should have responded in the affirmative. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation, such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? The applicant’s agent states: “Yes, there are conditions on this Property which ameliorate the goals and objectives of the zoning code and other regulations, including the preserve across from the Property and the waterbody to the rear of the Property, as discussed above. Each of these features mitigates the goals and objectives of the codified setbacks, as they provide additional buffers between the Property and other potentially affected homes.” Staff concurs. h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? The applicant’s agent states: “Yes, granting this variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. The Property is located in the Urban Residential Subdistrict. The Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan provides that the purpose of the Urban Residential Subdistrict is to is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. This Subdistrict comprises approximately 93,000 acres and 80% of the Urban Mixed Use District. Maximum eligible Page 186 of 271 VA-PL20240001811; 239 Bayfront Dr Page 8 of 8 08/22/2025 residential density shall be determined through the Density Rating System, but shall not exceed 16 dwelling units per acre except in accordance with the Transfer of Development Rights Section of the Land Development Code. The variance will not increase density over what has previously been approved and will allow for the construction of a single family home in a subdistrict that calls for higher densities.” Staff concurs. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: The EAC does not normally hear variance petitions. Since the subject variance doesn’t impact any preserve area, the EAC did not hear this petition. CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS: There are no concurrent land use applications under review at the present time. PUBLIC NOTICE: Notice Requirements for Variance petitions are contained within LDC Section 10.03.06.F.2. The required Agent Letter was sent to all property owners located within 150 feet of the subject property on or about August 7, 2025, as evidenced by an executed Affidavit of Compliance contained within Attachment F. Notice of the Hearing Examiner meeting was provided by a posting on the Clerk of Courts website, mailed notice to owners within 500 feet of the site, and posting of a public notice sign on the site at least 15 days prior to the hearing. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner APPROVE variance petition VA- PL20240001811, to reduce the required front yard from 27.83 feet to 12 feet and to reduce the required rear yard from 30 feet to 27.07 feet, to allow for the construction of a single-family residence with a building height of 55.65 feet as depicted within Attachment B in Tract I of the Lely Barefoot Beach PUD. Attachments: A. Legal Description B. Proposed Site Plan C. Construction Plans D. Sketch of Survey E. Zoning Verification Letter – ZLTR-PL20220001059 F. Applicant’s Backup - Application, Narrative, Agent Letter, etc. G. Public Hearing Sign Posting Page 187 of 271 Page 188 of 271 KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A. (239) 263-9996 www.kukk architecture.com BAYFRONT DRIVE 4.2 4.0 4.04.14.0 4.7 5.04.8 4.5 3.43.3 4.0 4.2 4.1 3.6 4.2 4.2 4.55.0 4.6 4.1 1.5 -1.4 -1.6 4.5 -1.8 3.3 2.1 4.13.93.2 3.9 4.8 4.44.8 4.4 4.2 5.1 5.04.9 4.5 3.6 3.7 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.7 3.8 S T C DYHW WE T O P O F B A N K M .H .W .L .LOT LINELOT LINELOT LINEL O T L IN E 7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K 10' FRONT SETBACK 15' DRAINAGE & U.E. 27.82' REAR SETBACK (1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT FROM C.O.R.) 2 7 .8 2 ' R E A R S E T B A C K (1/2 B U IL D IN G H E IG H T F R O M C .O .R .) 12' FRONT SETBACK 2 7 .0 7 ' R E A R S E T B A C K NSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1 Site Plan Page 189 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA0-0 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureCONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES AND LOCAL STATUTES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCT APPROVAL LIST COLLIER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVIDE POOL COVER OR ALARM ON ALL DOORS LEADING TO POOL BUILDING CODES BUILDING CODE: MECHANICAL CODE: PLUMBING CODE: ELECTRICAL CODE: LIFE SAFETY CODE: ACCESSIBILITY CODE: ENERGY CODE: FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, RESIDENTIAL 2020 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, MECHANICAL 2020 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, PLUMBING 2020 N.F.P.A. 70 N.F.P.A. 101 (2021) FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING 2020 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING 2020 BASIC WIND SPEED: RISK FACTOR: BUILDING OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE: EXPOSURE CATEGORY: WINDBORNE DEBRIS REGION: INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS: 170MPH (ult), 132MPH (asd) II GROUP R - RESIDENTIAL TYPE V B YES (IMPACT RESISTANT GLAZING) +0.18, -0.18 (ENCLOSED) NOT TO SCALE Front View NOTE: A SEPARATE PERMIT SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THE FOLOWING WHEN APPLICABLE: - GAS SERVICE AND GAS CONNECTIONS - SECURITY SYSTEM - FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM - ROLL DOWN STORM SHUTTERS - POOL - GENERATOR Gr ant-239 Bayfront Driv e ARCHITECT KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A . 1300 3rd Street South • Suite 203E • N APLES, FL 34102 TEL (239) 263-9996 GENERAL CONTRACTOR S TRUCTURAL ENGINEER Page 190 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA1-1 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureAREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1st Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,549 1,625 1,423 4,597 sq f t 2,058 218 120 53 222 128 2,799 sq f t 7,396 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -SOUTH LINE OF LOT 13BOATLIFTBAYFRONT DRIVECOASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINERECORDED JUNE 29, 1989**SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE #7**4.2 4.0 4.0 4.04.14.0 4.0 4.04.14.04.0 4.7 5.0 4.8 4.5 3.43.3 4.0 4.2 4.1 3.6 4.2 4.2 4.55.0 4.6 4.1 1.5 -1.4 -1.6 4.5 -1.8 3.3 2.1 -1.6 4.13.93.2 3.9 4.8 4.44.8 4.4 4.2 5.1 5.04.9 4.5 3.6 3.7 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.7 3.8 S T C DYHW WE 1 2 3 4 5 6 123456789123456718'-10 15/16"12'-5 3/16" 7'-7 13/16"20'-7 5/16"15'-3"30'-1 15/16"7'-9 1/2"30'-1 3/4"42'-10 9/16"7'-8 7/16" 9'-4 1/8"7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACKT O P O F B A N K M .H .W .L .19 RISERS (6 27/64")18 RUNS (12")6 RISERS (6 21/64")5 RUNS (12")UP UP LOT LINELOT LINELOT LINEL O T L IN E 10' FRONT SETBACK OR 15' DRAINAGE & U.E. 23'-3 1/2" 27'-9 7/8" FRONT SETBACK (1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT FROM C.O.R.) 2 7 '-9 7 /8 " R E A R S E T B A C K (1/2 B U IL D IN G H E IG H T )3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K Two Car Garage 1 Two Car Garage 2 Storage Pool & MEP Foyer Entry Elev. Pavers (non-structural), to be coordinated w/ landscape NSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Site Plan - 1s t Floor 4.02.01 D.6 Window- or -wall-mounted air conditioning units, chimneys, fireplaces, bay windows, or pilasters shall not project over two (2) feet into a required yard. 4.02.01 D.7 Fire escapes, stairways, and balconies which are unroofed (except as otherwise permitted with thin section) and enclosed shall not project over five (5) feet into a required side yard or rear yard and three (3) feet into a front yard of a multi-family dwelling, hotel or motel and not over three (3) feet into a required front, side or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained. 4.02.01 D.10 Cornices, eaves or gutters shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the required yard is less than six (6) feet in width, such projection shall not exceed one-half (½) the width of the yard. Page 191 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA1-2 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureAREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1st Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,549 1,625 1,423 4,597 sq ft 2,058 218 120 53 222 128 2,799 sq f t 7,396 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -SOUTH LINE OF LOT 13BOATLIFTBAYFRONT DRIVECOASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINERECORDED JUNE 29, 1989**SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE #7**S T C DYHW WE 101112131415161718 19 123456DOWN UP 7.5' SIDE SETBACK1 0 ' F R O N T S E T B A C K 7.5' SIDE SETBACK3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K T O P O F B A N K M .H .W .L .10' FRONT SETBACK OR 15' DRAINAGE & U.E. 3 ' C A N T IL E V E R (4 .0 2 .0 1 D .7 /D .10 ) 27'-9 7/8"FRONT SETBACK (1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT FROM C.O.R.) Kitchen Family Dining Living Lanai Pantry Elev.Pwdr.NSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Site Plan - 1s t Floor Page 192 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA2-1 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureSOUTH LINE OF LOT 13BAYFRONT DRIVE 4.0 4.04.14.0 4.7 5.0 4.8 4.5 3.43.3 4.0 4.2 4.1 3.6 4.2 4.2 4.55.0 4.6 4.1 1.5 -1.4 -1.6 4.5 -1.8 3.3 2.1 -1.6 4.13.93.2 3.9 4.8 4.44.8 4.4 4.2 5.1 5.04.9 4.5 3.6 3.7 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.7 3.8 T C DYHW WE 1 2 3 4 5 6 1234567891234567W02 W02 W02 D32 W02 D18 D32 D01W D01W W02 D18 W02 W02 W02 D01A D01 W02 D01W W02W02DXX 92' 55'-8"15'21'-4" 29'-9"5'-7"1'-2"18'1'-2"2'-1"5'-5"5'-5"2'-1"1'-8"18'1'-8"32'32'6'-9 3/4"9'-2 3/8"9'-2 3/8"6'-9 3/4"32'10'11'-8"10'-4"10'7'-8"4'2'-2"3'-2"5'92' 23'12'-4"19'-8 3/8"36'-11 5/8" 23'6'-9"5'-7"5'-4"9'5'-4 3/8"19'-3 5/8"10'-4 5/8"7'-3 3/8"30.26'30. 1 5'30.32'30.21 ' 7'-9 1/2"15.25'15.25'15.25'2" 3'-8" 1 A4-1 2 A4-2 2 A4-1 1 A4-2 7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACKT O P O F B A N K M .H .W .L .19 RISERS (6 27/64")18 RUNS (12")6 RISERS (6 21/64")5 RUNS (12")UP UP LOT LINELOT LINELOT LINEL O T L IN E 10' FRONT SETBACK OR 15' DRAINAGE & U.E. 23'-3 1/2" 27'-9 7/8" FRONT SETBACK (1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT FROM C.O.R.) 2 7 '-9 7 /8 " R E A R S E T B A C K (1/2 B U IL D IN G H E IG H T )3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K Two Car Garage 1 Two Car Garage 2 Storage Pool & MEP Foyer Entry Elev. AA A5-1 AA A5-1 BB A5-1 BB A5-1 CC A5-1 CC A5-1 #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID Pavers (non-structural), to be coordinated w/ landscape AREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1s t Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,549 1,625 1,423 4,597 sq f t 2,058 218 120 53 222 128 2,799 sq f t 7,396 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -NSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 Ground Floor 4.02.01 D.6 Window- or -wall-mounted air conditioning units, chimneys, fireplaces, bay windows, or pilasters shall not project over two (2) feet into a required yard. 4.02.01 D.7 Fire escapes, stairways, and balconies which are unroofed (except as otherwise permitted with thin section) and enclosed shall not project over five (5) feet into a required side yard or rear yard and three (3) feet into a front yard of a multi-family dwelling, hotel or motel and not over three (3) feet into a required front, side or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained. 4.02.01 D.10 Cornices, eaves or gutters shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the required yard is less than six (6) feet in width, such projection shall not exceed one-half (½) the width of the yard. ALL OVERHANGS & CANTILEVERS OVER SETBACKS & EASEMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH COLLIER COUNTY Page 193 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA2-2 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureSOUTH LINE OF LOT 13BAYFRONT DRIVECOASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINERECORDED JUNE 29, 1989**SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE #7**T C DYHW WE 101112131415161718 19 123456W02 W02 W02 W02 W02 D18 W02 W02W02 D01W D01 D01W D01 W17W17 W17 W02W02 W02 D18 1 A4-1 2 A4-2 2 A4-1 1 A4-2 69'8"7 5/8"5'-1/2"5 1/2"7 5/8"1'-2 3/8"9'-10"8" 7 5/8" 19'-3/4"7 5/8"5'-1/2"5 1/2"4'5 1/2"5'-1/2"7 5/8" 32'-8"15'21'-4" 1'-10"9'-10"8"4'12'-4"4'2'-8 1/8"4'-10"4'-10"2'-8 1/8"4'-9 5/8"11'-8 3/4"4'-9 5/8"37'32'5'16'9'-2 3/8"6'-9 3/4"5'1'-10"14'1'-10"4'2'3'-4"5'5'9'-10"8"10'-2"9'-6 3/8"8'-1 5/8"7'-6"3'-8"3'7'-4"7'-4" 19'-8 3/8"15'-7 5/8"21'-4"17'-8"4'5'-4"10'37'30.26'15.25'16.63'13.25'30.21 '30.32'30. 1 5'27.7'15.25'7.67' AA A5-1 AA A5-1 BB A5-1 BB A5-1 CC A5-1 CC A5-1 #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID DOWN UP 7.5' SIDE SETBACK1 0 ' F R O N T S E T B A C K 7.5' SIDE SETBACK3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K T O P O F B A N K M .H .W .L .10' FRONT SETBACK OR 15' DRAINAGE & U.E. 3 ' C A N T IL E V E R (4 .0 2 .0 1 D .7 /D .10 ) 27'-9 7/8"FRONT SETBACK (1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT FROM C.O.R.) Kitchen Family Dining Living Lanai Pantry Elev.Pwdr. 7.79' AREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1s t Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,549 1,625 1,423 4,597 sq f t 2,058 218 120 53 222 128 2,799 sq f t 7,396 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -NSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 1s t Floor 4.02.01 D.6 Window- or -wall-mounted air conditioning units, chimneys, fireplaces, bay windows, or pilasters shall not project over two (2) feet into a required yard. 4.02.01 D.7 Fire escapes, stairways, and balconies which are unroofed (except as otherwise permitted with thin section) and enclosed shall not project over five (5) feet into a required side yard or rear yard and three (3) feet into a front yard of a multi-family dwelling, hotel or motel and not over three (3) feet into a required front, side or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained. 4.02.01 D.10 Cornices, eaves or gutters shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the required yard is less than six (6) feet in width, such projection shall not exceed one-half (½) the width of the yard. ALL OVERHANGS & CANTILEVERS OVER SETBACKS & EASEMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH COLLIER COUNTY Page 194 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA2-3 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureWD78910111213141516 17 18 19 20 21 22 12345W02 W02 W02W17 W02 W02D18W02 W02 D01 D01W D01W D01W D01 D01W W17 D01W D01W D01W D01W D01W D18 W17 D01 D18 W 1 7 W17 W02W02 W02 W02 W02 W02CU 11 A4-1 2 A4-2 2 A4-1 1 A4-2 AA A5-1 AA A5-1 BB A5-1 BB A5-1 CC A5-1 CC A5-1 #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID 32'-8"15'21'-4" 1'-10"4'-2"10'-4"2'-2"4'4'2'-2"4'2'-8"4'-10"4'-10"2'-8"4'-9 5/8"5'-10 3/8"5'-10 3/8"4'-9 5/8"2'7 5/8"6'-7 1/2"2'-2"3 1/2"11'-11 3/8"2'7 5/8"4'3 1/2"4'-6"3 1/2"12'-1 3/4"1'-9 5/8"3'-4"3'-3"7 5/8"5'-11 3/4"3 1/2"3'-8"3 1/2"7'-6 1/2"3 1/2"15'7 5/8"7 5/8"6'-3"3 1/2" 7 5/8"13'-7 1/4"3 1/2"6'-2"7 5/8" 1'-10 5/8"9'-9 3/8"8"6'-6"3'-8"3'-8"5'-10 3/8"3'-3 5/8"9'-7 7/8"2'-8 1/8"2'-5 5/8"4'-2 1/2"7'-4"7'-4" 32'-3/8"7 5/8"1'-10"5'-6"1'-4"7'-2"1'-10"4'2'3'-4"5'2'-4"3'-4"69'3'-3"8'-8 7/8"5'-10 3/4"10'-6 5/8"9'-1 3/4"3'-4"3'-3"34'-4"3'-4"40'-11"12'-4"19'-8 3/8"15'-7 5/8"6'-8"14'-8" 69'7'-4"10'-4"4'12'-8"3'-4"37'-8"15.25'13.25'15.25'32.06' 29.32' 7.67'30. 1 8'30. 1 5'30.32'30.21 '27.07'7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K BED NOT CENTERED BENCH W/D STACK 20 RISERS (6 51/64")19 RUNS (12")DOWN UP3' C A N T IL E V E R (4 .0 2 .0 1 D .7 /D .10 ) 10' FRONT SETBACK 15' DRAINAGE & U.E. 27'-9 7/8"FRONT SETBACK (1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT FROM C.O.R.) VIP/Study M. Bath Hers Master HisUtility Elev. Lanai 2 VIP BathVIP Cl MEP 1 AREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1s t Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,549 1,625 1,423 4,597 sq f t 2,058 218 120 53 222 128 2,799 sq f t 7,396 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -NSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 2nd Floor 4.02.01 D.6 Window- or -wall-mounted air conditioning units, chimneys, fireplaces, bay windows, or pilasters shall not project over two (2) feet into a required yard. 4.02.01 D.7 Fire escapes, stairways, and balconies which are unroofed (except as otherwise permitted with thin section) and enclosed shall not project over five (5) feet into a required side yard or rear yard and three (3) feet into a front yard of a multi-family dwelling, hotel or motel and not over three (3) feet into a required front, side or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained. 4.02.01 D.10 Cornices, eaves or gutters shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the required yard is less than six (6) feet in width, such projection shall not exceed one-half (½) the width of the yard. ALL OVERHANGS & CANTILEVERS OVER SETBACKS & EASEMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH COLLIER COUNTY Page 195 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA2-4 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureWD12345 67891011121314 15 16 17 18 19 20 W02 W02 W02 W02 W02 W02 D18 W02 W02 W17 D18 W02W02 W02 W02W02 D02 D01 W17W17 D18 D01W D01W D01W D01W D02W D01W D01W D01W CU 2CU 3CU 4 1 A4-1 2 A4-2 2 A4-1 1 A4-2 AA A5-1 AA A5-1 BB A5-1 BB A5-1 CC A5-1 CC A5-1 #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID 3'-3"7 5/8"11'-5/8"3 1/2"5'-1/2"3 1/2"5'-1/2"3 1/2"11'-5/8"7 5/8"7 5/8"19'-3/4"7 5/8"15'7 5/8"5'-11 1/8"3 1/2"4'3 1/2"9'-6 5/8"7 5/8"7 5/8"5'-1/2"7 1/4"6'-4 7/8"3 1/2"4'-10 1/2"3 1/2"5'-3 5/8"3 1/2"7'-7 1/2"7 5/8"5'-10" Verify5'-10" Verify12'-4"19'-8 3/8"15'-7 5/8"21'-4" 12'-4"4'-2 7/8"12'-4 3/8"3'-1 1/8"3'-3 5/8"4'-10"4'-10"2'-8 1/8"10'-8"10'-8"3'-3"34'-4"3'-3"2'-4 3/4"7'-10"4'-3 1/4"5'-4"4'-3 1/4"7'-10"2'-4 3/4"12'-4"19'-8 3/8"15'-7 5/8"6'-8"14'-8" 12'-4"3'-9 7/8"2'-8 1/8"3'-8"3'-8"2'-8 1/8"3'-2 1/4"8'-1 5/8"7'-6"4'-9"1'-11"7'-4"7'-4"26'-11"8'-4"3'-3"17'-8"6'3'-4"5'2'-4"3 '-1 0 7 /8 "2 '-1 0 3 /4 "69' 6 '-9 5 /8 "6'-1 5/8"8"6'6'-6"8'-6"69' 7.67' 29.32' 32.06'30. 1 8'30. 1 5'30.32'30.21 '15.25'12.45'15.25'12'27.24'7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K QUEEN QUEEN DOWN 20 RISERS (6 51/64")19 RUN (12")10' FRONT SETBACK W/D STACK CONFIRM EQUIMENT 3 ' C A N T IL E V E R (4 .0 2 .0 1 D .7 /D .10 ) 15' DRAINAGE & U.E. 27'-9 7/8"FRONT SETBACK (1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT FROM C.O.R.)Elev. Cloud Room Siting Room MEP 2 Upper Deck Bed 3 Bed 4 B4 B5 Cl 4 Utility Stor. AREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1s t Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,549 1,625 1,423 4,597 sq f t 2,058 218 120 53 222 128 2,799 sq f t 7,396 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -NSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 3rd Floor 4.02.01 D.6 Window- or -wall-mounted air conditioning units, chimneys, fireplaces, bay windows, or pilasters shall not project over two (2) feet into a required yard. 4.02.01 D.7 Fire escapes, stairways, and balconies which are unroofed (except as otherwise permitted with thin section) and enclosed shall not project over five (5) feet into a required side yard or rear yard and three (3) feet into a front yard of a multi-family dwelling, hotel or motel and not over three (3) feet into a required front, side or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained. 4.02.01 D.10 Cornices, eaves or gutters shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the required yard is less than six (6) feet in width, such projection shall not exceed one-half (½) the width of the yard. ALL OVERHANGS & CANTILEVERS OVER SETBACKS & EASEMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH COLLIER COUNTY Page 196 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA4-1 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitecture13'-8"2"12'-2"2"11'-2"2"9'-4"1'6'-8"4.1'Crown Of Road ±0" T.O. Ground Floor Slab6.0' N.A.V.D. +6' Base Floor Elevation12.0' N.A.V.D. +7' Design Flood Elevation13.0' N.A.V.D. +13'-8" T.O. 1st Floor Slab19.67' N.A.V.D. +13'-10" T.O. 1st Floor Fin.19.83' N.A.V.D. +26' T.O. 2nd Floor Slab32.0' N.A.V.D. +26'-2" T.O. 2nd Floor Fin.32.17' N.A.V.D. +37'-4" T.O. 3rd Floor Slab43.33' N.A.V.D. +37'-6" T.O. 3rd Floor Fin.43.5' N.A.V.D. +46'-10" Roof Bearing52.83' N.A.V.D.46'-9" From D.F.E.(23'-4 1/2" Setback @ 1/2 Height)55'-7 3/4" From C.O.R.(27'-9 7/8" Setback @ 1/2 Height)4.1'Crown Of Road ±0" T.O. Ground Floor Slab6.0' N.A.V.D. +6' Base Floor Elevation12.0' N.A.V.D. +7' Design Flood Elevation13.0' N.A.V.D. +13'-8" T.O. 1st Floor Slab19.67' N.A.V.D. +13'-10" T.O. 1st Floor Fin.19.83' N.A.V.D. +26' T.O. 2nd Floor Slab32.0' N.A.V.D. +26'-2" T.O. 2nd Floor Fin.32.17' N.A.V.D. +37'-4" T.O. 3rd Floor Slab43.33' N.A.V.D. +37'-6" T.O. 3rd Floor Fin.43.5' N.A.V.D. +46'-10" Roof Bearing52.83' N.A.V.D.13'-8"2"12'-2"2"11'-2"2"9'-4"1'6'-8"SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 Front Ele vation SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 Rear Ele vation Page 197 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA4-2 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitecture4.1'Crown Of Road ±0" T.O. Ground Floor Slab6.0' N.A.V.D. +6' Base Floor Elevation12.0' N.A.V.D. +7' Design Flood Elevation13.0' N.A.V.D. +13'-8" T.O. 1st Floor Slab19.67' N.A.V.D. +13'-10" T.O. 1st Floor Fin.19.83' N.A.V.D. +26' T.O. 2nd Floor Slab32.0' N.A.V.D. +26'-2" T.O. 2nd Floor Fin.32.17' N.A.V.D. +37'-4" T.O. 3rd Floor Slab43.33' N.A.V.D. +37'-6" T.O. 3rd Floor Fin.43.5' N.A.V.D. +46'-10" Roof Bearing52.83' N.A.V.D.13'-8"2"12'-2"2"11'-2"2"9'-4"1'6'-8"4.1'Crown Of Road ±0" T.O. Ground Floor Slab6.0' N.A.V.D. +6' Base Floor Elevation12.0' N.A.V.D. +7' Design Flood Elevation13.0' N.A.V.D. +13'-8" T.O. 1st Floor Slab19.67' N.A.V.D. +13'-10" T.O. 1st Floor Fin.19.83' N.A.V.D. +26' T.O. 2nd Floor Slab32.0' N.A.V.D. +26'-2" T.O. 2nd Floor Fin.32.17' N.A.V.D. +37'-4" T.O. 3rd Floor Slab43.33' N.A.V.D. +37'-6" T.O. 3rd Floor Fin.43.5' N.A.V.D. +46'-10" Roof Bearing52.83' N.A.V.D.13'-8"2"12'-2"2"11'-2"2"9'-4"1'6'-8"SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 Lef t Side Ele vation SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 Rigth Side Ele vation Page 198 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA8-1 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureFront View Rear View Page 199 of 271 Page 200 of 271 Zoning Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 ● www.colliercountyfl.gov March 14, 2022 Jonathan Kukk Kukk Architecture & Design, P.A. 1300 3rd Street South, Suite 203E Naples, FL 34102 ZLTR-PL20220001059; Zoning Verification Letter for 239 Bayfront Drive, in Section 6, Township 48, Range 25 of unincorporated Collier County. Property ID/Folio Number: 23095001208 for this listed address comprising of +/- 0.17 acres. Mr. Kukk, This letter is in response to a Zoning Verification Letter (ZLTR) Application submitted on or about February 10th, 2022. The applicant requested verification of the questions listed below in bold print, which are followed by Staff’s responses. 1. Can pool and/or infinity edge cantilever over the setback? Per LDC section 4.02.01 D.7. attached, “Fire escapes, stairways, and balconies which are unroofed (except as otherwise permitted within this section) and unenclosed shall not project over five (5) feet into a required side or rear yard and three (3) feet into a front yard of a multi-family dwelling, hotel or motel and not over three (3) feet into a required front, side or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained.” An unroofed, unenclosed balcony may project up to three (3) feet into a required front, side, or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained. The above criteria applies to the “infinity edge trough cantilever over setback” of the pool deck as shown on building plans provided. This does not apply to the pool itself, which must comply with the LDC section as noted in response 2., below. 2. Can the house cantilever over the front setback? Per LDC section 4.02.01 D.3. attached, “Every part of every required yard shall be open and unobstructed from thirty (30) inches above the general ground level of the graded lot upward to the sky except as hereinafter provided or as otherwise permitted in this LDC.” The house itself, including its cantilevered elements must not encroach into the setback. See answer to question 1., above, for balcony encroachment. Page 201 of 271 Zoning Verification Letter ZLTR-PL20220001059 Zoning Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 ● www.colliercountyfl.gov 3. Building setbacks & height requirements (Information was relayed to us that the ordinance requiring yards half the building height is no longer required for this property. Please confirm.): The current official zoning atlas, an element of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Ordinance 04-41, as amended, reveals the subject property is zoned: Planned Unit Development (PUD), known as “Lely Barefoot Beach.” This was established by Ordinance 77-48, as amended with ordinances amending it attached. The following are the current requirements from section 10.5. Minimum Lot Yards (regarding C., the subject property is within Bayfront Gardens Subdivision): A. Yards which abut Lely Beach Boulevard: 25 feet. Required yards abutting Lely Beach Boulevard are also easements within which utilities, walkways, etc. may be installed. B. Yards which abut a public or private street right-of-way other than Lely Beach Boulevard: 10 feet or ½ the building height, whichever is greater. C. Yards which abut an adjoining homesite: 7½ feet or ½ the building height, whichever is greater, except for Bayfront Gardens Subdivision, as recorded in P.B. 14, Pg. 114-117, Public Records of Collier County: 7½ feet.. D. Yards between adjoining buildings on the same site: 15 feet or ½ the sum of the building heights, whichever is greater, except that in the case of clustered development wherein the site plan has been approved by the appropriate Collier County agency, separation between buildings may be less. E. Yards which abut beachfront common open space: none. F. Waterfront yards other than gulf front: 30 feet or ½ the building height, whichever is greater. G. Rear yards other than waterfront: 25 feet or ½ the building height, whichever is greater. Maximum Building Height for Tract I (the subject property is within Tract I; see attached PUD masterplan): three habitable floors, with the option of having one floor of parking and associated non-habitable utilitarian space beneath the first habitable floor. The maximum actual height is limited to 70 feet. Page 202 of 271 Zoning Verification Letter ZLTR-PL20220001059 Zoning Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 ● www.colliercountyfl.gov The information presented in this verification letter is based on the Collier County LDC and/or Growth Management Plan in effect as of this date. It is possible that subsequent amendment(s) to either of these documents could affect the validity of this verification letter. It is also possible that development of the subject property could be affected by other issues not addressed in this letter, such as, but not limited t o, concurrency related to the provision of adequate public facilities, environmental impact, and other requirements of the Collier County LDC or related ordinances. This letter represents a determination of Zoning Services Section staff. Should you disagree with this determination, you may request an Official Interpretation by the Zoning Director of the provisions of the Land Development Code pursuant to Sections 1.06.01.A and 10.02.02.F.1 of that Code. The fee for an Official Interpretation is identified in the most recent GMD Fee Schedule Resolution as approved by the Board of County Commissioners. To obtain copies of any document referenced herein, please contact the GMD Records Section at (239)252-5730 or by email at GMDPublicRecordRequest@colliercountyfl.gov. The LDC may be viewed online at www.municode.com / Municode Library / Florida / Collier County. Validated Ordinances may be viewed online via the Clerk of Court’s website, www.collierclerk.com / Records Search / BMR Records / Boards, Minutes, Records / BMR Validated Ordinances. Disclaimer: Issuance of a development permit by the County does not create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. Should you require additional information, I encourage you to contact me at my office at (239) 252-2599 or sean.kingston@colliercountyfl.gov. Researched and prepared by: Reviewed by: __________________________________ ___________________________________ Sean Kingston, Senior Planner Raymond Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division Zoning Services Section Page 203 of 271 $ 1,750,000 $ 1,710,000 $ 850,000 $ 100 $ 1,690,000 $ 670,000 $ 670,000 $ 0 $ 165,000 $ 165,000 $ 952,481 $ 7,704 $ 960,185 $ 124,906 $ 835,279 $ 25,000 $ 810,279 $ 25,000 $ 785,279 Collier County Proper ty AppraiserProperty Summar y Parcel No 23095001208 SiteAddress*Disclaimer 239BAYFRONTDR Site City BONITASPRINGS Site Zone*Note 34134 Name / Address 239 BAYFRONT LLC % DAN DAVIS 2445 BROWN RD City ORION State MI Zip 48359 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A06 180400 123A06 6 48 25 0.17 Legal BAYFRONT GARDENS LOT 12 AND THAT PORT LOT 13 DESC AS: BEG SE CNR LOT13, N 53DEG W TO MHWL AND PT CALLED POINT "A", RETURN TO POB ANDRUN N 39DEG E 4FT, N 50DEG W TO MHWL, THENCE SLY ALG MHWL TO POINT"A" Millage Area 3 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 180400 - BAYFRONT GARDENS School Other Total Use Code 1 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 4.889 6.0293 10.9183 Latest Sales Histor y (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 11/12/21 6045-2728 01/01/15 5213-446 12/13/11 4750-527 10/18/11 4728-1620 04/15/05 3776-77 10/28/99 2605-3113 06/09/99 2556-1300 02/16/95 2051-592 03/01/90 1510-1339 03/01/90 1510-1337 2021 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (-) Save our Home (=) Assessed Value (-) Homestead (=) School Taxable Value (-) Additional Homestead (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll Page 204 of 271 Collier County Proper ty AppraiserProperty Detail Parcel No 23095001208 SiteAddress*Disclaimer 239BAYFRONTDR Site City BONITASPRINGS Site Zone*Note 34134 Name / Address 239 BAYFRONT LLC % DAN DAVIS 2445 BROWN RD City ORION State MI Zip 48359 Permits (Provided for reference purposes only. *Full Disclaimer. ) TaxYr Issuer Permit #CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type 1992 COUNTY 91-10025 04/27/92 1992 COUNTY 92-1230 POOL 1992 COUNTY 92-1231 SCREEN ENCLOSURE 2020 COUNTY PRBD20181060876 02/12/19 02/11/19 RESIDENCE,DEMOLITION Land #Calc Code Units 10 RESIDENTIAL FF 8032 Building/Extra Features #YearBuilt Description Area AdjArea 10 1992 RESIDENTIAL 1809 0 20 1992 WOOD DOCK 220 220 30 1992 ALUM SCREENENC 3052 0 40 1992 SWIMMING POOL 450 0 50 1992 SPA 30 0 60 1992 KEYSTONE DECK 752 0 Page 205 of 271 Collier County Proper ty AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No 23095001208 SiteAddress*Disclaimer 239BAYFRONTDR Site City BONITASPRINGS Site Zone*Note 34134 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 206 of 271 ORDINANCE NO 06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA AMENDING SECTION XV ENTITLED TRACT J UTILITY SITE OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 77 48 AS AMENDED AND ORDINANCE NUMBER 85 21 AS AMENDED THE LEL Y BAREFOOT BEACH PUD CHANGING THE PERMITTED LAND USES ON TRACT J FROM UTILITY OR UTILIT ARIAN FACILITIES TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FOR ONE DWELLING UNIT TOGETHER WITH ACCESSORY USES AND ADDING REGULATIONS FOR MINIMUM LOT AREA MINIMUM LOT WIDTH MINIMUM YARDS MINIMUM FLOOR AREA OF PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES OFF STREET PARKING MAXIMUM HEIGHT AND SPECIAL ENVIRONMENT AL PROTECTION REGULATIONS ADDING EXHIBIT F AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CONSERVANCY INC LEL Y ESTATES INC AND COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE w I 1 WHEREAS on September 9 1977 the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 77 48 which established the Lely Barefoot Beach Planned Unit Development and WHEREAS on June 4 1985 the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 85 21 which reestablished the Lely Barefoot Beach Planned Unit Development Zoning District while at the same time amended Ordinance Number 77 48 and WHEREAS subsequent to these dates amendments to the Lely Barefoot Beach Planned Unit Development Zoning District were duly adopted by the Board of County Commissioners and WHEREAS Robert Andrea of Coastal Engineering Consultants Inc representing Lely Development Corporation petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to further amend the Lely Barefoot Beach PUD Ordinance NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA that SECTION ONE AMENDMENTS TO SECTION XV UTILITY SITE OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 77 48 AS AMENDED AND ORDINANCE NUMBER 85 21 AS AMENDED THE LEL Y BAREFOOT BEACH PUD Section XV entitled Utility Site of Ordinance Number 77 48 as amended and Ordinance Number 85 21 as amended the Lely Barefoot Beach PUD is hereby amended to read as follows TRACT J UTILITY SITE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Words stmel thrslIgk are deleted words underlined are added Page I of 4 Page 207 of 271 tltllltltltltltl r I 1 I I 1 1 I I I NN WWz p t b g g g gIIIr1rc1r IPJnrnnrtnr1 rt n r r r r r r r rr t Cf 0 r rT r W If o Oo I I I ItrI Z 10 0Ir1 I Ir r I I al b 10 0 I c r ll lI 1 11 III 1I I I I I I I W t to f 0 lJ1 loJ Q ln I J In NOO ONI ggggggg I g ICf 0 IeIrT I 11 10 rtl lID Ift I J 1 ll IfDOOtn0OlO 0 0 0000 NO IoOOOOOCllf r 1lIWloloONWI nc Q N01 1 I I I I I I I N o N lo tl III rT W II N 0 Z r00N lI ft wr0 JI 0 0 N r W Q Q l1 P 1 IV JlI o 0 l S Ill l 1I ft 1 III ft n nr o l 1I n 1 D ntl o 1 1 JlI tin ft llo o IttD l 0 D ti ggr l III 0 CII 01 tD II o III l rt0 tD t n Ot1 l I tD0l0 ID S cnnO 0 Cbgg1 g I I 011 tD 0 I tD 2 tll llontD tlll 0 tD III l tD n l nontl0 11I1OJ D 0 ft111 1i u 0 n i r m r oo JJ m0 n t z o u I r IIn n t l tD CII o l m X r J J i il I r iI l cnrl o ell tl c t1 ft Yo f1 r 01 txl rT tl tD 11 0 I n I nr J ft po I z11 A r l ft tDr Z 0 rT r w Q g o lI W Page 208 of 271 Page 209 of 271 H IS P A N IO L A GULF OF MEXICO 1 1 4 BLVD.BE ACHBAREFOOTTRACT 3 4 6LOT 35 PRESERVE AREA82 BAYFRONT DR.654 S T .3 4 1 3 4 21 3 4 6 2 CIALU 3 LN. 1 J U M E N T O C A Y L N .K A U L A L A N E 1 9 12 13 1011 423 5 6 16 17 12131415 11 3 1 27 8 BLVD10 9 8 11 13 12 LELY BAREFOOT BEACHPUD1,2,3,4,7,20,22,24,31 BD B E A C H 6432 IN A G U A L A N E10 13 1 12 43 11 9 5 6 7 B A R E F O O T 8 7 5V L N .5 1 2 4 HICKORY 6 7 LITTLE 5 14 15 16 BAY 19 2 17 LOT6 3418 2 1 5 5 5 H I J K 12 8,11,19V BD9 10BD 12BD 15BD16V 17BD BD 21 14BD 18BD BD13 23BD TRACT P TRACTA6 3 6 6 2 25,30CCCL 25,30CCCL 25,30CCCL 25,30CCCL 2 6CCCL 2 7CCCL 2 9CCSL 28CCCL LAST REVISION: ZONING ___________________ OTHER ___________________SUBDIVISON INDEX ATTEST___________________________CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TWP 48S RNG 25E SEC(S) 06 SO 1/2 MAP NUMBER: BY___________________________CHAIRMAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION$8506S 8507N 8505S8506N The Historic/Archaeological Probability Maps are the officialCounty source designating historic or archaeologic resources.NO. NAME P.B. Pg. 1 LELY BAREFOOT BEACH UNIT 1 12 34-372 BAYFRONT GARDENS 14 114-1173 LELY BAREFOOT BEACH UNIT 2 15 71-724 LELY BAREFOOT BEACH UNIT 3 16 55-585 BUSCAINO ESTATE 24 3-46 LELY BAREFOOT BEACH UNIT 5 49 31-3278910 ZONING NOTES1 6-4-85 PDA-85-1C 85-212 7-21-87 PDA-86-17C 87-833 7-21-87 PDA-86-18C 87-524 8-2-88 PDA-88-7 88-635 4-12-94 V-94-2 94-2796 7-6-89 BD-89-6 89-97 5-24-94 PUD-77-19(6) 94-288 10-8-96 V-96-18 96-4629 4-17-97 BD-97-8 97-1510 6-5-97 BD-97-14 97-2711 9-23-97 V-97-6 97-37812 1-15-98 BD-97-27 98-213 3-4-99 BD-98-45 99-1314 8-19-99 BD-99-15 99-3115 4-20-00 BD-00-2 00-0816 5-9-00 V-00-3 00-13417 11-2-00 BD-00-24 00-3018 12-21-00 BD-00-30 00-3619 3-13-01 V-00-33 01-8820 6-26-01 PUDA-01-AR-546 01-3521 10-2-03 BD-03-AR-4392 03-1322 5-23-06 PUDZ-04-AR-6283 06-2223 7-21-07 BD-07-AR-11344 07-0724 2-22-11 PUDA-PL-09-742 11-0425 10-27-87 CCCL-87-7C 87-25826 8-2-88 CCCL-88-12C 88-17927 8-2-88 CCCL-88-11C 88-18028 2-13-90 CCCL-89-7 90-6829 7-26-94 CCSL-94-11 94-52930 5-26-87 CCCL-87-3 87-11731 9-11-18 PUDA-PL-17-4421 18-41THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A PAGE OF THEOFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS REFERRED TO AND ADOPTEDBY REFERENCE BY ORDINANCE NO. 04-41 OF THECOUNTY OF COLLIER, FLORIDA, ADOPTED JUNE 22, 2004,AS AMENDED BY THE ZONING NOTES AND SUBDIVISIONINDEX REFERENCED HEREON. NO. NAME P.B. Pg. 11121314151617181920 0 400 SCALE9/19/18Page 210 of 271 Page 211 of 271 ORDINANCE 85 83 3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 8521 ORINAKCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 7748 LELy BEFOOTBEACH PUD BY AMENDING THE TITLE PAGE AND SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION cPROVIDE FOR THE REVISIONS AMENDING SECTION II fROJECT DEVELOPMENT TO REVISE THE DEVELOPMENF c TRACTS ADD FRACTIOALIZATION AND CONCEPTUAL PLAI oAPPROVAL PROCEDURES AD REVISE FINAL SITE EVELOPME PLA5 APPROVAL PROCEDURES ENDING SECTION X SING OR LTIFILY RESIDENTI DEVELOPMENT TO DELET5 TCTS E F AND G INCLUDING RELATED DEVELOPMEHI STAARDS AND PROVIDE FOR TCTS H D I ONLY REPCING SECTION XI TCT J UTILITY SITE WITH SECTION XI TCT LELY BEACH NORTH S INGLE OR LTIFILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS AND PROVIDIHG DEVELOPMENT STDDS D REGULATIONS REPCIG SECTION XII TCTS K AND L CONITY RECREATION AREAS WI SECTION XII TCT ACTIVE CONI2Y RECRTION AREA AND PROVIDING DEVELOPMENT STDAS A REGATIONS REPCING SECTION XIII TCTS M N A O NGROVE PRESERVES WITH SECTION XIII TC LELY BEACH SOUTH D PROVIDING DEVELOPMENT STDAS A REGUTIONS REPCING SECTION XIV EXCEPTIONS 0 CO SUBDIVISION REGATIONS WI SECTION XIV PASSIVE COMITY RECRTION kEA AND PROVIDIG DEVELOPMENT STDARDS D REGI AT IONS REPCIG SECTION XV UTILITIES CONDITIONS WITH SECTION XV TCT J UTILI SITE ICH WAS PREVIOUSLY SECTION XI AND PROVIDING THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT STANDAS REPCING SECTION IPOJECT IROVENTSWIiH SECTION XVI TCTS M N A O GROVE PRESERVES ICH WAS PREVIOUSLY SECTION XIII PROVIDING E ORIGINAL DEVELOPNT STA5S AND DEDCATION OF THESE TRACTS TO THE STATE REPCING SECTION II ENVIRONNTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL STIPATIONS WI2H SECTION XVII EXCEPFIONS TO COUN SUBDIVISION REGUTIONS ICH WAS PREVIOUSLY SECTION XIV PROVIDING THE ORIGINAL STDARDS D DITIONAL EXCEPTION TO THE REQUIRED STREET RIGHTOFWAYWIDTHS D ALIGNMENT REPCING SECTION XVIII PROTECTIVE COVENTS WITH SECTION XVIII UTILITIES CONDITIONS ICH WAS PREVIOUSLY SECTION D PROVIDING THE ORIGINAL GUTIONS DING SECTION XIX PROJECT IROVENTSICH WAS PREVIOUSLY SECTION I PROVIDING THE ORIGINAL REGUTIONS WITH MINOR MENTS TO PROVIDE FOR OTHER REVISIONS DING SECTION SPECIAL ENVIRONTAL PROTECTIOn REGATIONS TO PROVIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDAS REGUTIONS ICH A PART OF THE SELTDING SECTION IEIROT VISORY COCIL STIPU TIONS ICH WAS PVIOUSLY SECTION XVII D PROVIDING THE ORIGINAL STIPTIONS DNG SECTION II PROTEIVE COVENTS ICH WAS PREVIOUSLY SECTION III PROVIDING THE ORIGINAL PROTECTI COVENTS DING EXHIBITS A THROUGH E D PROVIDING EFFECTIVE DATE ERS on September 9 1977 the Board of County Coissioners approved Ordinance Number 7748 which established the Lely Barefoot Beach Planned Unit Development and ERS on June 4 1985 the Board of County Coissioners approved Ordinance Number 8521 which amended Ordinanca Number 7748 anf Page 212 of 271 I WHEREAS thereafter Robert H Blades filed a lawsuit in th Circuit Court for Collier County Florida Circuit Civil Number 851570CA01CTC against Lely Estates Inc a Florida Corporation and Collier County and WHEREAS simultaneously the Conservancy Inc a NotForProfit Florida Corporation filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court for Collier County Florida Circuit Civil Number 851571CAOCTCgainst Lely Estates Inc a Florida Corporation and Collier County and WHEREAS the Conservancy Inc and Lely Estates Inc desire to settle the above referenced casea and WHEREAS said settlement entails amendments to Ordinance Number 8521 an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 7748 which established the Lely Barefoot Beach Planned Unit Development NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COEMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA SECTION ONE Ordinance Number 8521 an Ordinance Amending Ordinance Number 7748 the Lely Barefoot Beach PUD is hereby amended as shown on the revised Barefoot Beach PUD Document attached heretc as Exhibit A and by reference made a part hereof SECTION TWO This Ordinance shall become effective upon notice that it has been received by the Office of the Secretary of State DATE December 17 1985 OdinanceAmend Barefoot Beach Page 213 of 271 RevseMay22986 BAREFOOT BEACH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LELY ESTATES INC 5101 East Tamiami Trail Naples Florida 33962 This PUD amends PUD ordinance 7748 and 8521 PREPARED BY Napeseda32940 COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INC 3883 Davis Boulevard PO Box 8306 aples Florida 33941 CEC File No 85149 MAR6Hg86 NOVEMBER 1985 DATE ISSUED DATE APPROVED BY CAPC DATE APPROVED BY BCCt27I15ORDINANCENUMBER8583 Page 214 of 271 SECTION I SECTION II SECTION III SECTION IV SECTION V SECTION VI SECTION VII SECTICN VIII SECTION IX SECTION X SECTION XI SECTION XII SECTION XIII SECTION XIV SECTION XV SECTIClN XVI INDEX PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DESCRIPTION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLATTED LELY BAREFOOT BEACH UNIT 1 BLOCKS A through K LOW DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LELY BAREFOOT BEACH UNIT 1 TRACT A GATEHOUSE COMPLEX SITE PLATTED LELY BAREFOOT BEACH UNIT 1 IRACT B COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER 1 SITE PLATTED LELY BAREFOOT BEACH UNIT 1 TRACT C LANDSCAPED ENTRANCE DRIVE STRIP PLATTED LELY BAREFOOT BEACH UNIT BEACH GARDENS A through K PLATTED LELY BAREFOOT BEACH TRACT BF BEACHFRONT COMMON OPEN SPACE TRACT D LOW DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TRACTS EFG H AND I NWMDRSESINGLE OR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT RAGJNETRACTLELYBEACHNORTHSINGLEORMULTIFAMILYRESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENTRAGKNMMNRGRANARATRACTACTIVECOMMUNITYRECREATIONAREARAGMNOMANGROVEPRESERVETRACTLELYBEACHSOUTHPASSIVECOMMUNITYRECREATIONAREAUEEGONDQNTRACTJUTILITYSITEPRJEGMPRgVEMENTRACTSMNOMANGROVEPRESERVES1thru23thru1011thru1415thru1617thru192021thru222324thru2728thru3435thru3840thru4344thru4849thru505152 Page 215 of 271 SECFION XVII NVRNMENAAVSDRGNG6PANEXCEPTIONSTOCOUNTYSUBDIVISIONREGULATIONSSECTIONXVIIIUTILITIESCONDITIONSSECTIONXIXPROJECTIMPROVEMENTSSECFIONXXSPECIALENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONREGULATIONSSECTIONXXIENVIRONMENTALADVISORYCOUNCILSTIPULATIONSSECTIONXXIPROTECTIVECOVENANTS53thru5455thru6162thru6768thru7374thru7576 Page 216 of 271 oo SECTION X TRACTS EiPTG H AND I SINGLE OR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 101 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to establish development regulations for the areas designated on ExhibtAas Tracts ETG H and I Low to Midrise Single or Multiple Family Residential 102 SITE PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS 6 27SeeSection25 Aakeeveeaaeawewae4sebdeveepedas aufepweeadeaeadmeRseese eumbewefdweRusweadwayswvesaRd pagaFeameweaealesanaeMe aeessewyusesaeUseeeuwessMa1epepawea geeeGeuayaeRe4espweeMessuaeeee beldgpewmsheseplaeappevalpeeess gaRaaeeaMemeseplaeappwevals seugh BRheeveRkaabwassebeeveepeR feaeeRalpawseaekpaeelaevelepeskall submadeaedaadd4meseeedsepae appepaeGeewGeuyageReeseae bu4degypesaadeeaeaeumbeedweeuRksTeadwaysdPSvesaRdpaPkRaPeasPeePe28mm Page 217 of 271 sueuwesPweweappwevagedeveapmee sePaaaeeeuaeesaRdeewappabe geuaewdaeeesbesepaappwevapeeess waaaeeaemesepanappevas 103 USES PERMITTED No building or structure or part thereof shall be erected altered or used or land used in whole or part for other than the folloing A Principal Uses 1 Detached single family residences 2 Attached single family residences such as villas zero lotltne homes cjuster homes townhouses etc 3 Two family residences 4 Multiple family residences 5 Common recreational areas B Accessory Uses 1 Customary uses and structures 2 Signs as permitted as per zoning ordinance in effect at the time permits are required or requested 29 Page 218 of 271 3 Model dwelling units shall be permitted in conjuncticn with the promotion of the proj ect Such model dwelling units shall be converted to privately owned dwelling units at the end of a two year period unless otherwise specifically approved by the County 4 Docks either individual or common 104 MAXIMUM PERMITTED DWELLING UNITS aeEe aeG 99ss Tract H 77 units Tract I 30 units The maximum number of dwelling units permitted on individual tracts EGadmaybeeeasee deeeasedby0pevedhathegesspeee awedRguemamumef69gweeguasse eeeee H and I may be tncreased provided that the gross project dwelling unit maximum of 690 units is not exceeded 105 REGULATIONS 1051 GENERAL All yards setbacks etc shall be in relation to the individual tract or parcel boundaries 1052 MINIMUM LOT AREA 6000 square feet for detached single family dwellings 30 mm mm mm Page 219 of 271 1053 1054 4000square feet per dwelling unit to two family structures 3000square feet per dwelling unit for three or more dwelling unit structures MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 60 feet for single family dwellings 100 feet for two or more family dwellings MINIMUM LOT YARDS Yards which abut Lely Beach Boulevard 25 feet Required ards abutting Lely Beach Boulevard are also easements within which utilities walkways etc may be installed Yards which abut a public or privatestreet rightofway other than Lely Beach Boulevard 10 feet or 12 the building height whichever is greater Yards which abut an adjoining homesite 7 feet or 12 the building height whichever is greater De Yards between adjoining buildings on the same site 15 feet or 12 the sum of the building heights whichever is greater except that in the case of cjustered development wherein the site plan has been approved by the appropri ate Collier County agency separation between buildings may be less Yards which abut beachfront commnopen space none 31 Page 220 of 271 1055 1056 FGuffeeetyadaeeestuetuemayeted uCwadeftheiReappevedbytheusees eheteteweatmpwevemeauaasavaw aeeeeheSategeasaSebakEee appwevedbyheeeagepatmeaeNatuwa ReseueesGeveeadaegabete GF Waterfront yards other than gulf front 30 feet or 12 the building height whichever is greater Rear yards other than waterfront 25 feet or 12 the building height whichever is greater MINIMUM DWELLING UNIT FLOOR AREA Each residential unit shall have a minimum floor area of 1200 square feet MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT Ao Tract ETGtamd H four habitable floors with the option of having one floor of parking and associated nonhabitable utilitarian space beneath the first habitable floor epleeefavageaefeeefpakagad asseeaeeRhababeuaPaRspaee beReathhepshababefee GB Tract I two habitable floors with the option of having one floor of parking and 32 mm mm Page 221 of 271 associated nonhabtable utilitarian space beneath the first habitable floor l 1057 OFFSTREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS As required by Collier County regulations in affect at the time permits are sought 1058 STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR BEACH FRONT BUILDINGS Special structural requirements designed to protect beachfront buildings from storm tide or wave damage are incorporated in the State of Florida approved protective covenants for the Lely Barefoot Beach project as contained in Coastal Setback Line Variance 7475V 40 heseeea seRsadasshabeappabeea bugsdeveepedeaesEFandG 99 MAtMUMBIEBNGGOVERAGENRAGEiFG hegeudeeveaebypeemdedesdeSa swueswaeEGsMaeeeeeeMe ma4mumesdeasueuegeuRdeeveae hesamebeaehfeRdeveepmeRspwwas pemeuedethePggdeeumeawheht4sPU medesepweveusypemtedmaaemweued eeveaebyesdaabudaswasSg4sS squareCeeb g6gBEAGHFRgNGgRRggRWHNWHGHWEEEGUN GONRUGONtGPRONBtED UpejeadeemeaeabyhegeeeyEeeeewe gepameeaedeBaeeeBeaepeJeeeaeee efebeaehweeeeaeaswehawemes 33 Page 222 of 271 BOOK suseeptSbeeeeepassbpeaWhweuebaYe GfeeSeeeheaeeFseuhaeeessead adsmaseaeweeweaSeCaeesmabe paeedkeeewdeswhehaepehbedwem Page 223 of 271 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER THE LELY BAREFOOTBEACH PUD AS AMENDED BY PROVIDING FOR SECTION ONE WHICH AMENDS SECTIONO MINIMUM LOT YARDS ANDSECTIONTW WHICH PROVIDES AN EFFECTIVE DATE S on September t Board of Co y Commissioners approved Ordinance Number which established the ely Barefoot Beach Planned Unit Developmentand ereas onDecember the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County Florida approved Ordinance Number and on July Ordinance and on August Ordinance all of which amended OrdinanceNOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Boardof County Commissioners of Collier County Florida XMINIMUM LOT YARDS Subsection C Minimum LotYards of Ordinance Number as amended Lely Barefoot Beach Planned Unit Development is hereby amended to read as follows C Yards whichabutanadjoining home site feet or the building heightwhichever is greaterv exceDt foT Bavfromt Gardens Subdivisiom as recorded in P B Pa Public Records CollierCountyfeetu EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shallbecome effective upon receipt of notice from the Secretary of StatethatthisOrdinancehasbeenfiled with the Secretaryof State words areadditions Words e pee are deletions Page 224 of 271 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissoners of Collier County Florida this r day of BOARD COUNTY C MIIONERS K IGHTE B RCK CLRK ARJORIE M BTUDENT d AMENDING ORDINANCE NO gkWordsJ are additions Words ez aepearedeletions Page 225 of 271 ORDINANCE NO. 18 - 41 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 85-83, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING NO. 85-21, WHICH AMENDED NO. 77-48, THE LELY BAREFOOT BEACH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD); BY AMENDING SECTION 10.5.6 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT FOR TRACT I TO INCREASE THE HEIGHT FROM TWO HABITABLE FLOORS TO THREE HABITABLE FLOORS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY KNOWN AS BAYFRONT GARDENS IS LOCATED SOUTH OF BONITA BEACH ROAD IN SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20170004421] WHEREAS, on September 27, 1977, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 77-48, which established the Lely Barefoot Beach Planned Unit Development PUD");and WHEREAS,the Board has subsequently approved multiple amendments of the PUD; and WHEREAS, Sarah Spector, Esquire of Roetzel & Andress, P.A., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend Ordinance No. 85-83, the relevant amendment to Ordinance No. 77-48, the Lely Barefoot Beach PUD. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO SECTION 10.5.6 TO INCREASE MAXIMUM HEIGHT. Subsection 10.5.6, Maximum Building Height, of Section X, Tracts H and I, Single or Multi-Family Residential Development, of Ordinance Number 77-48, as amended, Lely Barefoot Beach Planned Unit Development, is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.5.6 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT A. Tract H: four habitable floors, with the option of having one floor of parking and associated non-habitable utilitarian space beneath the first habitable floor. 18-CPS-01761/1409788/1]32 Underlined text is added; Strueli-thfeugh text is deleted. Barefoot Beach PUDA-PL20170004421 Page 1 of 2 7/27/2018 Page 226 of 271 B. Tract I: we-three habitable floors, with the option of having one floor of parking and associated non-habitable utilitarian space beneath the first habitable floor. The maximum actual height is limited to 70 feet. SECTION TWO: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by su er-majority vote by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida,this // ay of j'ejl-r,Y7 ,f , 2018. ATTEST:s.. t "BOARD 0 0 1 TY CO s•.SIONERS CRYSTAL ICckThrAW, Clerk COLLI ' CO ' TY, FL ciT j ABy: ! I _: /i By 1.ep We- ANDY SOLIS, Chairman Attest as to .,iiaifMan$ signature only. Approved as to form and legality: Ad4 Ait------ s,-;(\ L' h' v eidi Ashton-Cicko A '). Managing Assistant County Attorney This ordinance flied with the Se2}cretary of Sto c's Offic clay ofm '-- and acknowledgement of root hot filing received this Fly rThini, c e, -DeouSv 1 18-CPS-01761/1409788/1]32 Underlined text is added; sk-through text is deleted. Barefoot Beach PUDA-PL20170004421 Page 2 of 2 7/27/2018 Page 227 of 271 Created: 2021-09-07 10:00:01 [EST] (Supp. No. 24) Page 1 of 2 4.02.01 Dimensional Standards for Principal Uses in Base Zoning Districts D. Exemptions and exclusions from design standards. 1. The height limitations contained in LDC subsection 4.02.01 A. Table 2. Building Dimension Standards for Principal Uses in Base Zoning Districts do not apply to infrastructure in support of the building, such as mechanical penthouses, elevator shafts, stair shafts, mechanical equipment, mechanical screening, spires, belfries, cupolas, flagpoles, antennas, communications towers, water tanks, fire towers when operated by a branch of government, ventilators, chimneys, feed storage structures, silos, windmills, airport control towers, or other appurtenances placed above the roof level and not intended for human occupancy or for commercial purposes as provided below: a. Structural elements shall be no higher than necessary to accomplish the purpose it is intended to serve. b. The aggregate area of structures or appurtenances shall not exceed one-third the area of the supporting roof. c. Where this section conflicts with section 5.05.08, the provisions of section 5.05.08 will control. d. The heights of these structures or appurtenances thereto shall not exceed any height limitations prescribed by the Federal Aviation Agency or airport zoning regulations within the flight approach zone of airports. (See section 2.03.07 C.). 2. In instances where off-street parking is provided within the principal structure, the County Manager or designee may waive the maximum height requirements to the extent necessary to permit off-street parking within the principal structure, provided however: (1) the number of off-street parking spaces required by this LDC for the use involved may not be reduced; (2) the waiver in height shall not be greater than that necessary to provide for the off-street parking within the principal structure, with a maximum of two parking levels; (3) the waiver of the maximum height requirements are compatible with the uses on adjacent properties; and (4) for each off-street parking space permitted within the principal structure for which the maximum height waiver is granted, 300 square feet of additional open space beyond that which is otherwise required by this LDC shall be provided. 3. Every part of every required yard shall be open and unobstructed from thirty (30) inches above the general ground level of the gradedlot upward to the sky except as hereinafter provided or as otherwise permitted in this LDC. 4. Sills and other architectural and design treatments shall not project over twelve (12) inches into a required yard. 5. Movable awnings shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the yard is less than five (5) feet in width the projection shall not exceed one-half (1/2) the width of the yard. 6. Window- or wall-mounted air conditioning units, chimneys, fireplaces, bay windows, or pilasters shall not project over two (2) feet into a required yard. 7. Fire escapes, stairways, and balconies which are unroofed (except as otherwise permitted within this section) and unenclosed shall not project over five (5) feet into a required side or rear yard and three (3) feet into a front yard of a multi-familydwelling, hotel or motel and not over three (3) feet into a required front, side or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained. 8. Hoods, canopies, or roof overhangs shall not project over (3) three feet into a required yard, but shall not come closer than one (1) foot to the lot line. Page 228 of 271 Created: 2021-09-07 10:00:01 [EST] (Supp. No. 24) Page 2 of 2 9. Fences, walls and hedges, subject to section 5.03.02, ground mounted air conditioners, unenclosed pool equipment and well pumps, are permitted in required yards, subject to the provisions of section 4.06.00. This includes air conditioners that are ground mounted and those required to be elevated to meet flood elevation, including their supporting structures, provided the minimum separation of structures is maintained. 10. Cornices, eaves or gutters shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the required yard is less than six (6) feet in width, such projection shall not exceed one-half (½) the width of the yard. 11. Except as otherwise provided by this LDC, when lots on both sides of an undeveloped recorded lot contain a residential structure whose front yardsetback is less than is now required, the average of the setbacks of the two (2) contiguous developed lots shall serve to establish the minimum front yard requirement for the vacant lot. 12. In commercial, industrial and multi-family residential developments, carports which are open on all sides may encroach into the required yards provided they do not encroach into the required landscape buffers, as required by this LDC; and furthermore, if the landscaping is deficient where the carports are proposed, the landscaping must be upgraded to comply with the LDC requirements to the greatest extent possible prior to the issuance of a building permit for said carports. This shall be accomplished by a site development plan amendment or a site improvement plan approval. 13. Permanent emergency generators may be placed within the rear yard with a 10-foot rear yard setback. Permanent emergency generators may encroach into side yards up to 36 inches. Generators are not permitted to encroach into required front yards. For single-family and two-family dwelling units, see LDC section 5.03.07 for exceptions and requirements. Above-ground fuel tanks for the generators are subject to the same setbacks; however, underground tanks are not subject to setback requirements. In order to reduce noise during required routine exercising of the generators, this exercising is restricted to operating the generator for no more than 30 minutes, once every seven days, during the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and shall not exceed sound level limits for Manufacturing and Industrial uses as set forth in Ordinance No. 90-17, the Noise Ordinance, as amended. All permanent emergency generators must be equipped with sound attenuating housing to reduce noise. a. Facilities with fuel pumps. Permanent emergency generators and related fuel storage installed at existing facilities with fuel pumps may encroach into any required side or rear yards, provided the encroachment does not create a hazard to pedestrian or vehicular traffic. b. Assisted living facilities and nursing homes. Permanent emergency generators and related fuel storage installed at existing assisted living facilities or nursing homes that are subject to LDC section 5.05.04 E. may encroach into any required side or rear yards or buffers, provided the encroachment does not create a hazard to pedestrian or vehicular traffic. (Ord. No. 04-72, § 3.L; Ord. No. 05-27, § 3.P; Ord. No. 07-67, § 3.I; Ord. No. 10-23, § 3.Q; Ord. No. 12-38, § 3.J; Ord. No. 14-33, § 3.I; Ord. No. 18-18, § 3.G; Ord. No. 18-32, § 3.A; Ord. No. 19-13, § 3.A) Page 229 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA1-1 2185Grant ResidenceCLIENT: 12/16/21 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 12.16.21.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 12.16.21.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureAREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1st Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,540 1,625 1,423 4,588 sq f t 2,068 227 120 53 222 128 2,818 sq f t 7,406 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -SOUTH LINE OF LOT 13BOATLIFTBAYFRONT DRIVECOASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINERECORDED JUNE 29, 1989**SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE #7**4.2 4.0 4.0 4.04.14.0 4.0 4.04.14.04.0 4.7 5.0 4.8 4.5 3.43.3 4.0 4.2 4.1 3.6 4.2 4.2 4.55.0 4.6 4.1 1.5 -1.4 -1.6 4.5 -1.8 3.3 2.1 -1.6 4.13.93.2 3.9 4.8 4.44.8 4.4 4.2 5.1 5.04.9 4.5 3.6 3.7 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.7 3.8 S T C DYHW WE 1 2 3 4 5 6 1234567891234567891019'-6 9/16"13'-13/16"8'-3 7/16" 8'-4 5/8" 1 0 ' F R O N T S E T B A C K O R 1 /2 H A L F B U IL D IN G H E IG H T T O B E C O N F IR M E D 15' DRAINAGE & U.E.7.5' SIDE SETBACKOR 1/2 HALF BUILDING HEIGHTTO BE CONFIRMED7.5' SIDE SETBACKOR 1/2 HALF BUILDING HEIGHTTO BE CONFIRMED2' CANTILEVER FROM EASEMENT, VERIFY 3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K O R 1/2 H A L F B U IL D IN G H E IG H T T O P O F B A N K M .H .W .L .19 RISERS (6 27/64")18 RUNS (12")6 RISERS (6 21/64")5 RUNS (12")UP UP 3' CANTILEVER FROM EASEMENT, VERIFY 2' CANTILEVER FROM SETBACK, VERIFY 3' CANTILEVER FROM SETBACK, VERIFY 2 ' C A N T IL E V E R F R O M S E T B A C K , V E R IF Y 5 ' C A N T IL E V E R F R O M S E T B A C K , V E R IF Y Two Car Garage 1 Two Car Garage 2 Storage Pool & MEP Foyer Entry Elev.NSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Site Plan - 1s t Floor Page 230 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA1-2 2185Grant ResidenceCLIENT: 12/16/21 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 12.16.21.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 12.16.21.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureAREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1st Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,540 1,625 1,423 4,588 sq f t 2,068 227 120 53 222 128 2,818 sq f t 7,406 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -SOUTH LINE OF LOT 13BOATLIFTBAYFRONT DRIVECOASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINERECORDED JUNE 29, 1989**SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE #7**S T C DYHW WE 101112131415161718 19 12345DOWN UP 15' DRAINAGE & U.E.7.5' SIDE SETBACKOR 1/2 HALF BUILDING HEIGHTTO BE CONFIRMED1 0 ' F R O N T S E T B A C K O R 1 /2 H A L F B U IL D IN G H E IG H T T O B E C O N F IR M E D 7.5' SIDE SETBACKOR 1/2 HALF BUILDING HEIGHTTO BE CONFIRMED3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K O R 1 /2 H A L F B U IL D IN G H E IG H T T O P O F B A N K M .H .W .L .2' CANTILEVER FROM EASEMENT, VERIFY 3' CANTILEVER FROM EASEMENT, VERIFY 2' CANTILEVER FROM SETBACK, VERIFY 3' CANTILEVER FROM SETBACK, VERIFY 2 ' C A N T IL E V E R F R O M S E T B A C K , V E R IF Y 5 ' C A N T IL E V E R F R O M S E T B A C K , V E R IF Y Kitchen Family Dining Living Lanai Pantry Elev. POOL INFINITY EDGE TROUGH CANTILEVER OVER SETBACK/ EASEMENT TO BE CONFIRMED NSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Site Plan - 1s t Floor Page 231 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA2-1 2185Grant ResidenceCLIENT: 12/16/21 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 12.16.21.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 12.16.21.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureSOUTH LINE OF LOT 13BAYFRONT DRIVE 4.0 4.04.14.0 4.7 5.0 4.8 4.5 3.43.3 4.0 4.2 4.1 3.6 4.2 4.2 4.55.0 4.6 4.1 1.5 -1.4 -1.6 4.5 -1.8 3.3 2.1 -1.6 4.13.93.2 3.9 4.8 4.44.8 4.4 4.2 5.1 5.04.9 4.5 3.6 3.7 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.7 3.8 T C DYHW WE 1 2 3 4 5 6 12345678912345678910W02 W02 W02 D32 W02 D18 W02W02DXXD32 D01W D01WD01W W02 D18W02 W02 W02 D01A D01 W02 92' 55'-8"15'21'-4" 29'-9"5'-7"1'-2"18'1'-2"2'-2"5'-4"5'-4"2'-2"1'-8"18'1'-8"32'32'6'-9 3/4"9'-2 3/8"9'-2 3/8"6'-9 3/4"32'10'11'-8"10'-4"10'7'-8"4'2'3'-4"5'92' 23'12'-4"19'-8 3/8"15'-7 5/8"21'-4" 23'6'-9"5'-7"5'-4"9'5'-4 3/8"15'-7 5/8"21'-4" 1 A4-1 2 A4-2 2 A4-1 1 A4-2 1 0 ' F R O N T S E T B A C K O R 1 /2 H A L F B U IL D IN G H E IG H T T O B E C O N F IR M E D 15' DRAINAGE & U.E.7.5' SIDE SETBACKOR 1/2 HALF BUILDING HEIGHTTO BE CONFIRMED7.5' SIDE SETBACKOR 1/2 HALF BUILDING HEIGHTTO BE CONFIRMED2' CANTILEVER FROM EASEMENT, VERIFY 3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K O R 1/2 H A L F B U IL D IN G H E IG H T T O P O F B A N K M .H .W .L .19 RISERS (6 27/64")18 RUNS (12")6 RISERS (6 21/64")5 RUNS (12")UP UP 3' CANTILEVER FROM EASEMENT, VERIFY 2' CANTILEVER FROM SETBACK, VERIFY 3' CANTILEVER FROM SETBACK, VERIFY 2 ' C A N T IL E V E R F R O M S E T B A C K , V E R IF Y 5 ' C A N T IL E V E R F R O M S E T B A C K , V E R IF Y Two Car Garage 1 Two Car Garage 2 Storage Pool & MEP Foyer Entry Elev. AA A5-1 AA A5-1 BB A5-1 BB A5-1 CC A5-1 CC A5-1 #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID AREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1s t Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,540 1,625 1,423 4,588 sq f t 2,068 227 120 53 222 128 2,818 sq f t 7,406 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -NSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 Ground Floor 4.02.01 D.6 Window- or -wall-mounted air conditioning units, chimneys, fireplaces, bay windows, or pilasters shall not project over two (2) feet into a required yard. 4.02.01 D.7 Fire escapes, stairways, and balconies which are unroofed (except as otherwise permitted with thin section) and enclosed shall not project over five (5) feet into a required side yard or rear yard and three (3) feet into a front yard of a multi- family dwelling, hotel or motel and not over three (3) feet into a required front, side or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained. 4.02.01 D.10 Cornices, eaves or gutters shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the required yard is less than six (6) feet in width, such projection shall not exceed one-half (½) the width of the yard. ALL OVERHANGS & CANTILEVERS OVER SETBACKS & EASEMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH COLLIER COUNTY 1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT SETBACKS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH COLLIER COUNTY Page 232 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA2-2 2185Grant ResidenceCLIENT: 12/16/21 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 12.16.21.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 12.16.21.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureSOUTH LINE OF LOT 13BAYFRONT DRIVECOASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINERECORDED JUNE 29, 1989**SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE #7**T C DYHW WE 101112131415161718 19 12345W02 W02 W02 W02 W02 D18 W02 D18 W02W02 W02W02W02 D01W D01 D01W D01 W17W17 W17 1 A4-1 2 A4-2 2 A4-1 1 A4-2 69'8"7 5/8"5'-1/2"5 1/2"7 5/8"5'-1/2"5 1/2"4'5 1/2"5'-1/2"7 5/8" 32'-8"15'21'-4" 1'-10"9'-10"8"4'-2"12'4'-2"2'-8 1/8"4'-10"4'-10"2'-8 1/8"4'-9 5/8"11'-8 3/4"4'-9 5/8"37'32'5'16'9'-2 3/8"6'-9 3/4"5'7 5/8"1'-10"14'1'-10"4'2'3'-4"5'5'1'-10"9'-10"8"10'-2"9'-6 3/8"8'-1 5/8"7'-6"3'-8"3'7'-4"7'-4" 69' 12'-4"19'-8 3/8"15'-7 5/8"21'-4"17'-8"4'5'-4"10'37'AA A5-1 AA A5-1 BB A5-1 BB A5-1 CC A5-1 CC A5-1 #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID DOWN UP 15' DRAINAGE & U.E.7.5' SIDE SETBACKOR 1/2 HALF BUILDING HEIGHTTO BE CONFIRMED1 0 ' F R O N T S E T B A C K O R 1 /2 H A L F B U IL D IN G H E IG H T T O B E C O N F IR M E D 7.5' SIDE SETBACKOR 1/2 HALF BUILDING HEIGHTTO BE CONFIRMED3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K O R 1 /2 H A L F B U IL D IN G H E IG H T T O P O F B A N K M .H .W .L .2' CANTILEVER FROM EASEMENT, VERIFY 3' CANTILEVER FROM EASEMENT, VERIFY 2' CANTILEVER FROM SETBACK, VERIFY 3' CANTILEVER FROM SETBACK, VERIFY 2 ' C A N T IL E V E R F R O M S E T B A C K , V E R IF Y 5 ' C A N T IL E V E R F R O M S E T B A C K , V E R IF Y Kitchen Family Dining Living Lanai Pantry Elev. POOL INFINITY EDGE TROUGH CANTILEVER OVER SETBACK/ EASEMENT TO BE CONFIRMED AREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1s t Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,540 1,625 1,423 4,588 sq f t 2,068 227 120 53 222 128 2,818 sq f t 7,406 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -NSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 1s t Floor 4.02.01 D.6 Window- or -wall-mounted air conditioning units, chimneys, fireplaces, bay windows, or pilasters shall not project over two (2) feet into a required yard. 4.02.01 D.7 Fire escapes, stairways, and balconies which are unroofed (except as otherwise permitted with thin section) and enclosed shall not project over five (5) feet into a required side yard or rear yard and three (3) feet into a front yard of a multi- family dwelling, hotel or motel and not over three (3) feet into a required front, side or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained. 4.02.01 D.10 Cornices, eaves or gutters shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the required yard is less than six (6) feet in width, such projection shall not exceed one-half (½) the width of the yard. ALL OVERHANGS & CANTILEVERS OVER SETBACKS & EASEMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH COLLIER COUNTY 1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT SETBACKS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH COLLIER COUNTY Page 233 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA2-3 2185Grant ResidenceCLIENT: 12/16/21 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 12.16.21.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 12.16.21.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureWD67891011121314 15 16 17 18 19 20 12345W02 W02 W02W17W02W02 W02 W02 W02 W02 W02D18W02 W02 D01 D01W D01W D01W D01 D01W W17 D01W D01W D01W D01W D01W D18 W17 W 1 7 W17 D01 D18 W02CU 11 A4-1 2 A4-2 2 A4-1 1 A4-2 AA A5-1 AA A5-1 BB A5-1 BB A5-1 CC A5-1 CC A5-1 #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID 32'-8"15'21'-4" 1'-10"4'-2"6'-4"4'-2"2'4'4'2'4'-2"2'-8"4'-10"4'-10"2'-8 1/8"4'-9 5/8"5'-10 3/8"5'-10 3/8"4'-9 5/8"2'7 5/8"6'-7 1/2"2'-2"3 1/2"11'-11 3/8"2'7 5/8"4'3 1/2"4'-6"3 1/2"12'-1 3/4"1'-9 5/8"3'-4"3'-3"7 5/8"5'-11 3/4"3 1/2"3'-8"3 1/2"7'-6 1/2"3 1/2"15'7 5/8"7 5/8"6'-3"3 1/2" 7 5/8"13'-7 1/4"3 1/2"6'-2"7 5/8" 1'-10 5/8"9'-9 3/8"8"6'-6"3'-8"3'-8"5'-10 3/8"3'-3 5/8"9'-7 7/8"2'-8 1/8"2'-5 5/8"4'-2 1/2"7'-4"7'-4" 32'-3/8"7 5/8"1'-10"5'-6"1'-4"7'-2"1'-10"4'2'3'-4"5'2'-4"5'69'3'-3"8'-8 7/8"5'-10 3/4"10'-6 5/8"9'-1 3/4"5'3'-3"34'-4"5'42'-7"12'-4"19'-8 3/8"15'-7 5/8"6'-8"14'-8" 69'7'-4"10'-4"4'12'-8"5'39'-4"CANTILEVER OVER EASEMENT TO BE CONFIRMED CANTILEVER OVER EASEMENT TO BE CONFIRMED 15' DRAINAGE & U.E.7.5' SIDE SETBACKOR 1/2 HALF BUILDING HEIGHTTO BE CONFIRMED1 0 ' F R O N T S E T B A C K O R 1 /2 H A L F B U I L D I N G H E I G H T T O B E C O N F I R M E D7.5' SIDE SETBACKOR 1/2 HALF BUILDING HEIGHTTO BE CONFIRMED3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K O R 1/2 H A L F B U IL D IN G H E IG H T T O B E C O N F IR M E D BED NOT CENTERED BENCH W/D STACK 20 RISERS (6 51/64")19 RUNS (12")DOWN UP 2' CANTILEVER FROM EASEMENT, VERIFY 3' CANTILEVER FROM EASEMENT, VERIFY 2' CANTILEVER FROM SETBACK, VERIFY 3' CANTILEVER FROM SETBACK, VERIFY 2 ' C A N T IL E V E R F R O M S E T B A C K , V E R IF Y5' C A N T IL E V E R F R O M S E T B A C K , V E R IF Y VIP/Study M. Bath Hers Master HisUtility Elev. Lanai 2 VIP BathCl # MEP 1 AREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1s t Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,540 1,625 1,423 4,588 sq f t 2,068 227 120 53 222 128 2,818 sq f t 7,406 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -NSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 2nd Floor 4.02.01 D.6 Window- or -wall-mounted air conditioning units, chimneys, fireplaces, bay windows, or pilasters shall not project over two (2) feet into a required yard. 4.02.01 D.7 Fire escapes, stairways, and balconies which are unroofed (except as otherwise permitted with thin section) and enclosed shall not project over five (5) feet into a required side yard or rear yard and three (3) feet into a front yard of a multi- family dwelling, hotel or motel and not over three (3) feet into a required front, side or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained. 4.02.01 D.10 Cornices, eaves or gutters shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the required yard is less than six (6) feet in width, such projection shall not exceed one-half (½) the width of the yard. ALL OVERHANGS & CANTILEVERS OVER SETBACKS & EASEMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH COLLIER COUNTY 1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT SETBACKS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH COLLIER COUNTY Page 234 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA2-4 2185Grant ResidenceCLIENT: 12/16/21 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 12.16.21.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 12.16.21.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureWD12345 67891011121314 15 16 17 18 19 20 W02 W02 W02 W02 W02 W02 D18 W02 W02 W17 D18 W02W02 W02 W02 W02 D02 D01 W17W17 D18 D01W D01W D01W D01W D02W D01W D01W D01W CU 2CU 31 A4-1 2 A4-2 2 A4-1 1 A4-2 AA A5-1 AA A5-1 BB A5-1 BB A5-1 CC A5-1 CC A5-1 #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID 3'-3"7 5/8"11'-5/8"3 1/2"5'-1/2"3 1/2"5'-1/2"3 1/2"11'-5/8"7 5/8"4'-8"7 5/8"19'-3/4"7 5/8"15'7 5/8"5'-11 1/8"3 1/2"4'3 1/2"9'-6 5/8"7 5/8"7 5/8"5'-1/2"5 1/2"6'-6 5/8"3 1/2"4'-10 1/2"3 1/2"5'-3 5/8"3 1/2"7'-7 1/2"7 5/8"5'-10" Verify5'-10" Verify12'-4"19'-8 3/8"15'-7 5/8"21'-4" 12'-4"4'-2 7/8"12'-4 3/8"3'-1 1/8"3'-3 5/8"4'-10"4'-10"2'-8 1/8"10'-8"10'-8"42'-3"3'-3"34'-4"4'-8"3'-3"2'-4 3/4"7'-10"4'-3 1/4"5'-4"4'-3 1/4"7'-10"2'-4 3/4"4'-8"12'-4"19'-8 3/8"15'-7 5/8"6'-8"14'-8" 12'-4"3'-9 7/8"2'-8 1/8"3'-8"3'-8"2'-8 1/8"3'-2 1/4"8'-1 5/8"7'-6"4'-9"1'-11"7'-4"7'-4"42'-3"26'-11"8'-4"7'3'-3"17'-8"6'3'-4"5'2'-4"4'-8"3 '-1 0 7 /8 "2 '-1 0 3 /4 "69' 6 '-9 5 /8 "6'-1 5/8"8"6'6'-6"8'-6"69' CANTILEVER OVER EASEMENT TO BE CONFIRMED CANTILEVER OVER EASEMENT TO BE CONFIRMED 15' DRAINAGE & U.E.7.5' SIDE SETBACKOR 1/2 HALF BUILDING HEIGHTTO BE CONFIRMED7.5' SIDE SETBACK1 0 ' F R O N T S E T B A C K O R 1 /2 H A L F B U I L D I N G H E I G H T T O B E C O N F I R M E DOR 1/2 HALF BUILDING HEIGHTTO BE CONFIRMED3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K O R 1/2 H A L F B U IL D IN G H E IG H T T O B E C O N F IR M E D QUEEN QUEEN DOWN 20 RISERS (6 51/64")19 RUN (12")2' CANTILEVER FROM EASEMENT, VERIFY 3' CANTILEVER FROM EASEMENT, VERIFY 2' CANTILEVER FROM SETBACK, VERIFY 3' CANTILEVER FROM SETBACK, VERIFY 2 ' C A N T IL E V E R F R O M S E T B A C K , V E R IF Y 5 ' C A N T IL E V E R F R O M S E T B A C K , V E R IF Y W/D STACK CONFIRM EQUIMENT Elev. Cloud Room Siting Room MEP 2 Upper Deck Bed 3 Bed 4 B4 B5 Cl 4 Utility Stor. AREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1s t Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,540 1,625 1,423 4,588 sq f t 2,068 227 120 53 222 128 2,818 sq f t 7,406 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -NSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 3rd Floor 4.02.01 D.6 Window- or -wall-mounted air conditioning units, chimneys, fireplaces, bay windows, or pilasters shall not project over two (2) feet into a required yard. 4.02.01 D.7 Fire escapes, stairways, and balconies which are unroofed (except as otherwise permitted with thin section) and enclosed shall not project over five (5) feet into a required side yard or rear yard and three (3) feet into a front yard of a multi- family dwelling, hotel or motel and not over three (3) feet into a required front, side or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained. 4.02.01 D.10 Cornices, eaves or gutters shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the required yard is less than six (6) feet in width, such projection shall not exceed one-half (½) the width of the yard. ALL OVERHANGS & CANTILEVERS OVER SETBACKS & EASEMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH COLLIER COUNTY 1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT SETBACKS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH COLLIER COUNTY Page 235 of 271 VARIANCE PETITION APPLICATION 239 BAYFRONT DRIVE, BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 PROJECT NARRATIVE I. REQUEST 239 Bayfront LLC (“Applicant”) is requesting approval of two (2) variances related to the property located at 239 Bayfront Drive, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 (the “Property”). The Property, located with the Bayfront Gardens neighborhood, is currently vacant. A site plan has been prepared for the proposed single family home to be constructed on the Property. For purposes of calculating the required setbacks, the actual height of the proposed single family home will be 55.65’ Required Proposed Variance Requested Front 10’ or ½ the building height (27.83), whichever is greater 12.00’ (maximum) 15.83’ Side 7.5’7.67’N/A Rear 30’ or ½ the building height, whichever is greater 27.07’ (maximum) 2.93’1 Based on the foregoing, we are requesting a front setback variance from Section 10.5.4.B, Ordinance 85-83, to allow for a setback of only 12’ when the required setback, one half of the building height, is 27.83’. We are also requesting a rear setback variance from Section 10.4.5.G, Ordinance 85-83, to allow for a setback of 27.07’ when the required setback is 30’. II. PROPERTY HISTORY The Bayfront Gardens subdivision plat (the “Plat”) was approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners at a regular meeting held on October 27, 1987. The Plat created 33 lots, 10 of which front on Barefoot Beach Road and 23 of which front on Bayfront Drive. All lots back up to Little Hickory Bay, which creates a natural constraint on development of the properties created by the Plat, including the Property. There was previously a home on the Property, but it was demolished in the beginning of 2019. The Property has remained vacant since that time. III.LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CRITERIA 1 It is noted that Section 4.02.01(D)(7) of the Collier County Land Development Code provides that stairways and balconies may overhang a maximum of three feet (3’) into a required rear yard setback applicable to single-family residential dwelling units. That being said, Section 4.02.01 addresses dimensional standards for principal uses in base zoning districts. Given that the Property is located within a Planned Unit Development, and has not been given a base zoning designation, we are requesting a rear setback variance in an abundance of caution. Page 236 of 271 (a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved? Yes. The request is intended to accommodate the environmentally sensitive area and narrow lots. At its absolute widest point at the northeast corner of the Property, including overhangs, the proposed home is just over 40’ wide. Where the Property narrows at the southwest corner, the proposed home is less than 18’ wide. The PUD Ordinance for the Property governs setbacks based on height as well. However, in 2017, the PUD regulations were updated to permit three (3) habitable stories versus the two (2) habitable stories permitted prior. Such increased height allows for more resilient development, but in turn, increases the setbacks for new development in the community compared to those homes developed prior to the 2017 permitted height increase. Therefore, the requested variances are intended to address the unusual and narrow shape of the lot paired with the increased height to allow for the development of a single-family dwelling unit that is consistent with the community and area. With respect to the rear yard, there is an environmentally sensitive area between the proposed building footprint and the waterbody. These sensitive environmental conditions prohibit the installation of a pool and customary outdoor living areas to the rear of the structure. As a result, these amenities have been designed to be elevated but necessitate a taller overall structure to accommodate the habitable area within the dwelling unit. Due to the resulting increased height, the required setbacks have also increased. As such, the variances requested would allow for setbacks that are consistent with the existing development, while allowing for more elevation of the structures on the Property. (b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of this variance request? Yes. The lots were not created by the owner, nor did the owner create the environmental conditions that necessitate the need to elevate the pool away from said lands. The narrow lot dimensions (discussed above), made more restrictive by the presence of environmentally sensitive lands (also discussed above), necessitate the variance. The Applicant did not create those conditions. (c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant? Yes, a literal interpretation of the provisions of the LDC would confer an undue hardship on the Applicants and create numerous practical difficulties. Literal interpretation of the Code would create undue hardship by either eliminating typical residential features, such as the pool and/or bedrooms, to accommodate the more expansive setbacks imposed based on height. Conversely, the approval of the variance would allow for the Page 237 of 271 development of the structure in a manner that is consistent and harmonious with existing development in the community, with no deleterious impacts on the general health, safety and welfare. (d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote the health, safety or welfare? Yes, the two (2) requested variances are the minimum variances that will make possible the reasonable use of the Property. As demonstrated on the site plan and dimensional floor plan, the Applicant has proposed a four-bedroom home that would contain approximately 4,600 sq. ft. of habitable area (under air), which is reasonable for the community and surrounding area. The lanais and pool are also customary residential features in both the immediate neighborhood and surrounding area. Thus, the variances requested would allow for the development of the Property in a manner that is consistent and harmonious with the area, which in turn promotes health, safety, and welfare. Absent the variances, the structure could not be as tall as currently proposed, although the proposed height is permitted by right. The loss of height would in turn result in the loss of bedrooms (likely two (2) bedrooms of the four (4) proposed), thus making unreasonable use of the Property. Thus, the variances requested are the minimum to make reasonable use of the Property. (e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? No, the variances requested would not confer on the Applicants any special privilege, but rather would allow the property to be developed in conformity with the surrounding neighborhood. (f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of the LDC, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? No. The variance would allow the property to be developed in the same manner as other nearby structures, retaining a consistent and harmonious scheme of development within the neighborhood and surrounding area. The location of the waterbody offsets impacts to property owners across the waterbody. The waterbody appears to be approximately 110’ wide at that location, so this additional separation between rear yards offsets any impacts to property owners that may have otherwise resulted from the decrease in rear yard. In the same vein, the parcel located across from the subject property is a preserve area owned by the Bayfront Gardens Association. As such, there are no dwellings or other Page 238 of 271 uses across Bayfront Dr. that would be adversely impacted by the decreased front yard area. The decreased front setback would also not obstruct visibility from Bayfront Dr. and therefore would not be injurious to drivers. This is evidenced by the minimum required front setback of 10’, as well as other similarly situated properties in the neighborhood. (g) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc.? Yes, there are conditions on this Property which ameliorate the goals and objectives of the zoning code and other regulations, including the preserve across from the Property and the waterbody to the rear of the Property, as discussed above. Each of these features mitigates the goals and objectives of the codified setbacks, as they provide additional buffers between the Property and other potentially affected homes. (h) Will granting this variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Yes, granting this variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. The Property is located in the Urban Residential Subdistrict. The Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan provides that the purpose of the Urban Residential Subdistrict is to is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. This Subdistrict comprises approximately 93,000 acres and 80% of the Urban Mixed Use District. Maximum eligible residential density shall be determined through the Density Rating System but shall not exceed 16 dwelling units per acre except in accordance with the Transfer of Development Rights Section of the Land Development Code. The variance will not increase density over what has previously been approved and will allow for the construction of a single family home in a subdistrict that calls for higher densities. 21660174 _1 Page 239 of 271 INSTR 6163304 OR 6045 PG 2728 E-RECORDED 11/23/2021 8:17 AM PAGES 3 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $12,250.00 REC $27.00 CONS $1,750,000.00 Prepared by Without Opinion of Title: Craıg D. Blume, P.A. 750 11th Street South, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34102 Parcel I.D. (Folio) No. 23095001208 Consıderation: $1,750,000.00 WARRANTY DEED THIS WARRANTY DEED is made the 12 day of November, 2021, by Donald Louis Foianı II, and Lucia Foiani, husband and wife, whose post office address is 12543 Colliers Reserve Drive, Naples, FL 34110, hereinafter called the Grantors, to 239 Bayfront LLC, a Florida limited lıabılity company, whose post office address 1s c/o Dan Davıs, 2445 Brown Road, Orion, MI 48359, hereinafter called the Grantee: WITNESSETH: That the Grantors, for and in consideration of the sum of $10 and other valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grant, bargain, sell, alıen, remıse, release, convey and confirm unto the Grantees, all that certaın land situated in Collier County, Florida, and described as: SEE ATTACHED EХHІBІT А 1n TOGETHER with all tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever. AND the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantees that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2021; subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record common to the subdivision. Page 240 of 271 Page 241 of 271 Page 242 of 271 Page 243 of 271 Page 244 of 271 Page 245 of 271 Page 246 of 271 Page 247 of 271 Page 248 of 271 Page 249 of 271 Page 250 of 271 Page 251 of 271 Page 252 of 271 Page 253 of 271 Page 254 of 271 KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A. (239) 263-9996 www.kukk architecture.com BAYFRONT DRIVE 4.2 4.0 4.04.14.0 4.7 5.04.8 4.5 3.43.3 4.0 4.2 4.1 3.6 4.2 4.2 4.55.0 4.6 4.1 1.5 -1.4 -1.6 4.5 -1.8 3.3 2.1 4.13.93.2 3.9 4.8 4.44.8 4.4 4.2 5.1 5.04.9 4.5 3.6 3.7 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.7 3.8 S T C DYHW WE T O P O F B A N K M .H .W .L .LOT LINELOT LINELOT LINEL O T L IN E 7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K 10' FRONT SETBACK 15' DRAINAGE & U.E. 27.82' REAR SETBACK (1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT FROM C.O.R.) 2 7 .8 2 ' R E A R S E T B A C K (1/2 B U IL D IN G H E IG H T F R O M C .O .R .) 12' FRONT SETBACK 2 7 .0 7 ' R E A R S E T B A C K NSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1 Site Plan Page 255 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA0-0 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureCONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES AND LOCAL STATUTES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCT APPROVAL LIST COLLIER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVIDE POOL COVER OR ALARM ON ALL DOORS LEADING TO POOL BUILDING CODES BUILDING CODE: MECHANICAL CODE: PLUMBING CODE: ELECTRICAL CODE: LIFE SAFETY CODE: ACCESSIBILITY CODE: ENERGY CODE: FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, RESIDENTIAL 2020 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, MECHANICAL 2020 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, PLUMBING 2020 N.F.P.A. 70 N.F.P.A. 101 (2021) FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING 2020 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING 2020 BASIC WIND SPEED: RISK FACTOR: BUILDING OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE: EXPOSURE CATEGORY: WINDBORNE DEBRIS REGION: INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS: 170MPH (ult), 132MPH (asd) II GROUP R - RESIDENTIAL TYPE V B YES (IMPACT RESISTANT GLAZING) +0.18, -0.18 (ENCLOSED) NOT TO SCALE Front View NOTE: A SEPARATE PERMIT SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THE FOLOWING WHEN APPLICABLE: - GAS SERVICE AND GAS CONNECTIONS - SECURITY SYSTEM - FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM - ROLL DOWN STORM SHUTTERS - POOL - GENERATOR Gr ant-239 Bayfront Driv e ARCHITECT KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A . 1300 3rd Street South • Suite 203E • N APLES, FL 34102 TEL (239) 263-9996 GENERAL CONTRACTOR S TRUCTURAL ENGINEER Page 256 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA1-1 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureAREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1st Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,549 1,625 1,423 4,597 sq f t 2,058 218 120 53 222 128 2,799 sq f t 7,396 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -SOUTH LINE OF LOT 13BOATLIFTBAYFRONT DRIVECOASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINERECORDED JUNE 29, 1989**SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE #7**4.2 4.0 4.0 4.04.14.0 4.0 4.04.14.04.0 4.7 5.0 4.8 4.5 3.43.3 4.0 4.2 4.1 3.6 4.2 4.2 4.55.0 4.6 4.1 1.5 -1.4 -1.6 4.5 -1.8 3.3 2.1 -1.6 4.13.93.2 3.9 4.8 4.44.8 4.4 4.2 5.1 5.04.9 4.5 3.6 3.7 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.7 3.8 S T C DYHW WE 1 2 3 4 5 6 123456789123456718'-10 15/16"12'-5 3/16" 7'-7 13/16"20'-7 5/16"15'-3"30'-1 15/16"7'-9 1/2"30'-1 3/4"42'-10 9/16"7'-8 7/16" 9'-4 1/8"7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACKT O P O F B A N K M .H .W .L .19 RISERS (6 27/64")18 RUNS (12")6 RISERS (6 21/64")5 RUNS (12")UP UP LOT LINELOT LINELOT LINEL O T L IN E 10' FRONT SETBACK OR 15' DRAINAGE & U.E. 23'-3 1/2" 27'-9 7/8" FRONT SETBACK (1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT FROM C.O.R.) 2 7 '-9 7 /8 " R E A R S E T B A C K (1/2 B U IL D IN G H E IG H T )3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K Two Car Garage 1 Two Car Garage 2 Storage Pool & MEP Foyer Entry Elev. Pavers (non-structural), to be coordinated w/ landscape NSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Site Plan - 1s t Floor 4.02.01 D.6 Window- or -wall-mounted air conditioning units, chimneys, fireplaces, bay windows, or pilasters shall not project over two (2) feet into a required yard. 4.02.01 D.7 Fire escapes, stairways, and balconies which are unroofed (except as otherwise permitted with thin section) and enclosed shall not project over five (5) feet into a required side yard or rear yard and three (3) feet into a front yard of a multi-family dwelling, hotel or motel and not over three (3) feet into a required front, side or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained. 4.02.01 D.10 Cornices, eaves or gutters shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the required yard is less than six (6) feet in width, such projection shall not exceed one-half (½) the width of the yard. Page 257 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA1-2 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureAREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1st Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,549 1,625 1,423 4,597 sq ft 2,058 218 120 53 222 128 2,799 sq f t 7,396 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -SOUTH LINE OF LOT 13BOATLIFTBAYFRONT DRIVECOASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINERECORDED JUNE 29, 1989**SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE #7**S T C DYHW WE 101112131415161718 19 123456DOWN UP 7.5' SIDE SETBACK1 0 ' F R O N T S E T B A C K 7.5' SIDE SETBACK3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K T O P O F B A N K M .H .W .L .10' FRONT SETBACK OR 15' DRAINAGE & U.E. 3 ' C A N T IL E V E R (4 .0 2 .0 1 D .7 /D .10 ) 27'-9 7/8"FRONT SETBACK (1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT FROM C.O.R.) Kitchen Family Dining Living Lanai Pantry Elev.Pwdr.NSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Site Plan - 1s t Floor Page 258 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA2-1 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureSOUTH LINE OF LOT 13BAYFRONT DRIVE 4.0 4.04.14.0 4.7 5.0 4.8 4.5 3.43.3 4.0 4.2 4.1 3.6 4.2 4.2 4.55.0 4.6 4.1 1.5 -1.4 -1.6 4.5 -1.8 3.3 2.1 -1.6 4.13.93.2 3.9 4.8 4.44.8 4.4 4.2 5.1 5.04.9 4.5 3.6 3.7 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.7 3.8 T C DYHW WE 1 2 3 4 5 6 1234567891234567W02 W02 W02 D32 W02 D18 D32 D01W D01W W02 D18 W02 W02 W02 D01A D01 W02 D01W W02W02DXX 92' 55'-8"15'21'-4" 29'-9"5'-7"1'-2"18'1'-2"2'-1"5'-5"5'-5"2'-1"1'-8"18'1'-8"32'32'6'-9 3/4"9'-2 3/8"9'-2 3/8"6'-9 3/4"32'10'11'-8"10'-4"10'7'-8"4'2'-2"3'-2"5'92' 23'12'-4"19'-8 3/8"36'-11 5/8" 23'6'-9"5'-7"5'-4"9'5'-4 3/8"19'-3 5/8"10'-4 5/8"7'-3 3/8"30.26'30. 1 5'30.32'30.21 ' 7'-9 1/2"15.25'15.25'15.25'2" 3'-8" 1 A4-1 2 A4-2 2 A4-1 1 A4-2 7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACKT O P O F B A N K M .H .W .L .19 RISERS (6 27/64")18 RUNS (12")6 RISERS (6 21/64")5 RUNS (12")UP UP LOT LINELOT LINELOT LINEL O T L IN E 10' FRONT SETBACK OR 15' DRAINAGE & U.E. 23'-3 1/2" 27'-9 7/8" FRONT SETBACK (1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT FROM C.O.R.) 2 7 '-9 7 /8 " R E A R S E T B A C K (1/2 B U IL D IN G H E IG H T )3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K Two Car Garage 1 Two Car Garage 2 Storage Pool & MEP Foyer Entry Elev. AA A5-1 AA A5-1 BB A5-1 BB A5-1 CC A5-1 CC A5-1 #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID Pavers (non-structural), to be coordinated w/ landscape AREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1s t Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,549 1,625 1,423 4,597 sq f t 2,058 218 120 53 222 128 2,799 sq f t 7,396 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -NSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 Ground Floor 4.02.01 D.6 Window- or -wall-mounted air conditioning units, chimneys, fireplaces, bay windows, or pilasters shall not project over two (2) feet into a required yard. 4.02.01 D.7 Fire escapes, stairways, and balconies which are unroofed (except as otherwise permitted with thin section) and enclosed shall not project over five (5) feet into a required side yard or rear yard and three (3) feet into a front yard of a multi-family dwelling, hotel or motel and not over three (3) feet into a required front, side or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained. 4.02.01 D.10 Cornices, eaves or gutters shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the required yard is less than six (6) feet in width, such projection shall not exceed one-half (½) the width of the yard. ALL OVERHANGS & CANTILEVERS OVER SETBACKS & EASEMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH COLLIER COUNTY Page 259 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA2-2 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureSOUTH LINE OF LOT 13BAYFRONT DRIVECOASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINERECORDED JUNE 29, 1989**SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE #7**T C DYHW WE 101112131415161718 19 123456W02 W02 W02 W02 W02 D18 W02 W02W02 D01W D01 D01W D01 W17W17 W17 W02W02 W02 D18 1 A4-1 2 A4-2 2 A4-1 1 A4-2 69'8"7 5/8"5'-1/2"5 1/2"7 5/8"1'-2 3/8"9'-10"8" 7 5/8" 19'-3/4"7 5/8"5'-1/2"5 1/2"4'5 1/2"5'-1/2"7 5/8" 32'-8"15'21'-4" 1'-10"9'-10"8"4'12'-4"4'2'-8 1/8"4'-10"4'-10"2'-8 1/8"4'-9 5/8"11'-8 3/4"4'-9 5/8"37'32'5'16'9'-2 3/8"6'-9 3/4"5'1'-10"14'1'-10"4'2'3'-4"5'5'9'-10"8"10'-2"9'-6 3/8"8'-1 5/8"7'-6"3'-8"3'7'-4"7'-4" 19'-8 3/8"15'-7 5/8"21'-4"17'-8"4'5'-4"10'37'30.26'15.25'16.63'13.25'30.21 '30.32'30. 1 5'27.7'15.25'7.67' AA A5-1 AA A5-1 BB A5-1 BB A5-1 CC A5-1 CC A5-1 #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID DOWN UP 7.5' SIDE SETBACK1 0 ' F R O N T S E T B A C K 7.5' SIDE SETBACK3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K T O P O F B A N K M .H .W .L .10' FRONT SETBACK OR 15' DRAINAGE & U.E. 3 ' C A N T IL E V E R (4 .0 2 .0 1 D .7 /D .10 ) 27'-9 7/8"FRONT SETBACK (1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT FROM C.O.R.) Kitchen Family Dining Living Lanai Pantry Elev.Pwdr. 7.79' AREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1s t Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,549 1,625 1,423 4,597 sq f t 2,058 218 120 53 222 128 2,799 sq f t 7,396 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -NSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 1s t Floor 4.02.01 D.6 Window- or -wall-mounted air conditioning units, chimneys, fireplaces, bay windows, or pilasters shall not project over two (2) feet into a required yard. 4.02.01 D.7 Fire escapes, stairways, and balconies which are unroofed (except as otherwise permitted with thin section) and enclosed shall not project over five (5) feet into a required side yard or rear yard and three (3) feet into a front yard of a multi-family dwelling, hotel or motel and not over three (3) feet into a required front, side or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained. 4.02.01 D.10 Cornices, eaves or gutters shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the required yard is less than six (6) feet in width, such projection shall not exceed one-half (½) the width of the yard. ALL OVERHANGS & CANTILEVERS OVER SETBACKS & EASEMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH COLLIER COUNTY Page 260 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA2-3 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureWD78910111213141516 17 18 19 20 21 22 12345W02 W02 W02W17 W02 W02D18W02 W02 D01 D01W D01W D01W D01 D01W W17 D01W D01W D01W D01W D01W D18 W17 D01 D18 W 1 7 W17 W02W02 W02 W02 W02 W02CU 11 A4-1 2 A4-2 2 A4-1 1 A4-2 AA A5-1 AA A5-1 BB A5-1 BB A5-1 CC A5-1 CC A5-1 #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID 32'-8"15'21'-4" 1'-10"4'-2"10'-4"2'-2"4'4'2'-2"4'2'-8"4'-10"4'-10"2'-8"4'-9 5/8"5'-10 3/8"5'-10 3/8"4'-9 5/8"2'7 5/8"6'-7 1/2"2'-2"3 1/2"11'-11 3/8"2'7 5/8"4'3 1/2"4'-6"3 1/2"12'-1 3/4"1'-9 5/8"3'-4"3'-3"7 5/8"5'-11 3/4"3 1/2"3'-8"3 1/2"7'-6 1/2"3 1/2"15'7 5/8"7 5/8"6'-3"3 1/2" 7 5/8"13'-7 1/4"3 1/2"6'-2"7 5/8" 1'-10 5/8"9'-9 3/8"8"6'-6"3'-8"3'-8"5'-10 3/8"3'-3 5/8"9'-7 7/8"2'-8 1/8"2'-5 5/8"4'-2 1/2"7'-4"7'-4" 32'-3/8"7 5/8"1'-10"5'-6"1'-4"7'-2"1'-10"4'2'3'-4"5'2'-4"3'-4"69'3'-3"8'-8 7/8"5'-10 3/4"10'-6 5/8"9'-1 3/4"3'-4"3'-3"34'-4"3'-4"40'-11"12'-4"19'-8 3/8"15'-7 5/8"6'-8"14'-8" 69'7'-4"10'-4"4'12'-8"3'-4"37'-8"15.25'13.25'15.25'32.06' 29.32' 7.67'30. 1 8'30. 1 5'30.32'30.21 '27.07'7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K BED NOT CENTERED BENCH W/D STACK 20 RISERS (6 51/64")19 RUNS (12")DOWN UP3' C A N T IL E V E R (4 .0 2 .0 1 D .7 /D .10 ) 10' FRONT SETBACK 15' DRAINAGE & U.E. 27'-9 7/8"FRONT SETBACK (1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT FROM C.O.R.) VIP/Study M. Bath Hers Master HisUtility Elev. Lanai 2 VIP BathVIP Cl MEP 1 AREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1s t Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,549 1,625 1,423 4,597 sq f t 2,058 218 120 53 222 128 2,799 sq f t 7,396 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -NSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 2nd Floor 4.02.01 D.6 Window- or -wall-mounted air conditioning units, chimneys, fireplaces, bay windows, or pilasters shall not project over two (2) feet into a required yard. 4.02.01 D.7 Fire escapes, stairways, and balconies which are unroofed (except as otherwise permitted with thin section) and enclosed shall not project over five (5) feet into a required side yard or rear yard and three (3) feet into a front yard of a multi-family dwelling, hotel or motel and not over three (3) feet into a required front, side or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained. 4.02.01 D.10 Cornices, eaves or gutters shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the required yard is less than six (6) feet in width, such projection shall not exceed one-half (½) the width of the yard. ALL OVERHANGS & CANTILEVERS OVER SETBACKS & EASEMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH COLLIER COUNTY Page 261 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA2-4 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureWD12345 67891011121314 15 16 17 18 19 20 W02 W02 W02 W02 W02 W02 D18 W02 W02 W17 D18 W02W02 W02 W02W02 D02 D01 W17W17 D18 D01W D01W D01W D01W D02W D01W D01W D01W CU 2CU 3CU 4 1 A4-1 2 A4-2 2 A4-1 1 A4-2 AA A5-1 AA A5-1 BB A5-1 BB A5-1 CC A5-1 CC A5-1 #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID #DrgID #LayID 3'-3"7 5/8"11'-5/8"3 1/2"5'-1/2"3 1/2"5'-1/2"3 1/2"11'-5/8"7 5/8"7 5/8"19'-3/4"7 5/8"15'7 5/8"5'-11 1/8"3 1/2"4'3 1/2"9'-6 5/8"7 5/8"7 5/8"5'-1/2"7 1/4"6'-4 7/8"3 1/2"4'-10 1/2"3 1/2"5'-3 5/8"3 1/2"7'-7 1/2"7 5/8"5'-10" Verify5'-10" Verify12'-4"19'-8 3/8"15'-7 5/8"21'-4" 12'-4"4'-2 7/8"12'-4 3/8"3'-1 1/8"3'-3 5/8"4'-10"4'-10"2'-8 1/8"10'-8"10'-8"3'-3"34'-4"3'-3"2'-4 3/4"7'-10"4'-3 1/4"5'-4"4'-3 1/4"7'-10"2'-4 3/4"12'-4"19'-8 3/8"15'-7 5/8"6'-8"14'-8" 12'-4"3'-9 7/8"2'-8 1/8"3'-8"3'-8"2'-8 1/8"3'-2 1/4"8'-1 5/8"7'-6"4'-9"1'-11"7'-4"7'-4"26'-11"8'-4"3'-3"17'-8"6'3'-4"5'2'-4"3 '-1 0 7 /8 "2 '-1 0 3 /4 "69' 6 '-9 5 /8 "6'-1 5/8"8"6'6'-6"8'-6"69' 7.67' 29.32' 32.06'30. 1 8'30. 1 5'30.32'30.21 '15.25'12.45'15.25'12'27.24'7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK3 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K QUEEN QUEEN DOWN 20 RISERS (6 51/64")19 RUN (12")10' FRONT SETBACK W/D STACK CONFIRM EQUIMENT 3 ' C A N T IL E V E R (4 .0 2 .0 1 D .7 /D .10 ) 15' DRAINAGE & U.E. 27'-9 7/8"FRONT SETBACK (1/2 BUILDING HEIGHT FROM C.O.R.)Elev. Cloud Room Siting Room MEP 2 Upper Deck Bed 3 Bed 4 B4 B5 Cl 4 Utility Stor. AREA CALCUL ATIONS AC Space Non AC Space 01. 1s t Floor 02. 2nd Floor 03. 3rd Floor 01. Ground Floor 02. Lanai 1 03. Lanai 2 04. MEP 1 05. Upper Deck 06. MEP 2 1,549 1,625 1,423 4,597 sq f t 2,058 218 120 53 222 128 2,799 sq f t 7,396 sq f t - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -NSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 3rd Floor 4.02.01 D.6 Window- or -wall-mounted air conditioning units, chimneys, fireplaces, bay windows, or pilasters shall not project over two (2) feet into a required yard. 4.02.01 D.7 Fire escapes, stairways, and balconies which are unroofed (except as otherwise permitted with thin section) and enclosed shall not project over five (5) feet into a required side yard or rear yard and three (3) feet into a front yard of a multi-family dwelling, hotel or motel and not over three (3) feet into a required front, side or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained. 4.02.01 D.10 Cornices, eaves or gutters shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the required yard is less than six (6) feet in width, such projection shall not exceed one-half (½) the width of the yard. ALL OVERHANGS & CANTILEVERS OVER SETBACKS & EASEMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH COLLIER COUNTY Page 262 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA4-1 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitecture13'-8"2"12'-2"2"11'-2"2"9'-4"1'6'-8"4.1'Crown Of Road ±0" T.O. Ground Floor Slab6.0' N.A.V.D. +6' Base Floor Elevation12.0' N.A.V.D. +7' Design Flood Elevation13.0' N.A.V.D. +13'-8" T.O. 1st Floor Slab19.67' N.A.V.D. +13'-10" T.O. 1st Floor Fin.19.83' N.A.V.D. +26' T.O. 2nd Floor Slab32.0' N.A.V.D. +26'-2" T.O. 2nd Floor Fin.32.17' N.A.V.D. +37'-4" T.O. 3rd Floor Slab43.33' N.A.V.D. +37'-6" T.O. 3rd Floor Fin.43.5' N.A.V.D. +46'-10" Roof Bearing52.83' N.A.V.D.46'-9" From D.F.E.(23'-4 1/2" Setback @ 1/2 Height)55'-7 3/4" From C.O.R.(27'-9 7/8" Setback @ 1/2 Height)4.1'Crown Of Road ±0" T.O. Ground Floor Slab6.0' N.A.V.D. +6' Base Floor Elevation12.0' N.A.V.D. +7' Design Flood Elevation13.0' N.A.V.D. +13'-8" T.O. 1st Floor Slab19.67' N.A.V.D. +13'-10" T.O. 1st Floor Fin.19.83' N.A.V.D. +26' T.O. 2nd Floor Slab32.0' N.A.V.D. +26'-2" T.O. 2nd Floor Fin.32.17' N.A.V.D. +37'-4" T.O. 3rd Floor Slab43.33' N.A.V.D. +37'-6" T.O. 3rd Floor Fin.43.5' N.A.V.D. +46'-10" Roof Bearing52.83' N.A.V.D.13'-8"2"12'-2"2"11'-2"2"9'-4"1'6'-8"SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 Front Ele vation SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 Rear Ele vation Page 263 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA4-2 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitecture4.1'Crown Of Road ±0" T.O. Ground Floor Slab6.0' N.A.V.D. +6' Base Floor Elevation12.0' N.A.V.D. +7' Design Flood Elevation13.0' N.A.V.D. +13'-8" T.O. 1st Floor Slab19.67' N.A.V.D. +13'-10" T.O. 1st Floor Fin.19.83' N.A.V.D. +26' T.O. 2nd Floor Slab32.0' N.A.V.D. +26'-2" T.O. 2nd Floor Fin.32.17' N.A.V.D. +37'-4" T.O. 3rd Floor Slab43.33' N.A.V.D. +37'-6" T.O. 3rd Floor Fin.43.5' N.A.V.D. +46'-10" Roof Bearing52.83' N.A.V.D.13'-8"2"12'-2"2"11'-2"2"9'-4"1'6'-8"4.1'Crown Of Road ±0" T.O. Ground Floor Slab6.0' N.A.V.D. +6' Base Floor Elevation12.0' N.A.V.D. +7' Design Flood Elevation13.0' N.A.V.D. +13'-8" T.O. 1st Floor Slab19.67' N.A.V.D. +13'-10" T.O. 1st Floor Fin.19.83' N.A.V.D. +26' T.O. 2nd Floor Slab32.0' N.A.V.D. +26'-2" T.O. 2nd Floor Fin.32.17' N.A.V.D. +37'-4" T.O. 3rd Floor Slab43.33' N.A.V.D. +37'-6" T.O. 3rd Floor Fin.43.5' N.A.V.D. +46'-10" Roof Bearing52.83' N.A.V.D.13'-8"2"12'-2"2"11'-2"2"9'-4"1'6'-8"SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 Lef t Side Ele vation SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 Rigth Side Ele vation Page 264 of 271 REVISIONS DATE: FILE NAME: 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLORIDA REGISTRATION AA-0003541 ARCHITECTS © Kukk Architecture & Design,P.A. All rights Reserved. Permit SHEET NUMBER: SIGN & SEAL;TELThe Proposed Plans ForA8-1 2185Grant-239 Bayfront DriveCLIENT: 4/10/24 00/00/00239 Bayfront DriveBonita Springs,FL/Volumes/KAD Data/KAD Data/000-Projects/2185 Grant 5 - 239 Bayfront/2185 - Drawings/00_KAD/2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln2185 - 239 Bay Front 04.05.24.pln 2022KUKK ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN, P.A.•1300 Third Street SouthSuite 203E•NAPLES,FL34102(239) 263-9996www.kukkarchitecture.comwww.houzz.com/pro/kukkarchitectureFront View Rear View Page 265 of 271 Page 266 of 271 2320 First Street, Suite 1000 Fort Myers, FL 33901 Direct Dial 239.744.3469 PHONE 239.337.3850 FAX 239.337.0970 zliebetreu@ralaw.com WWW.RALAW.COM August 7, 2025 VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL Property Owners within 150 feet of 239 Bayfront Drive Re:Variances Requested for 239 Bayfront Drive Dear Property Owners: Please be advised that the sender has made a formal application to Collier County for a variance from the requirements of the zoning regulations as they apply to the following described property: 239 Bayfront Drive, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Turn South at the intersection of Bonita Beach Road and Barefoot Beach Boulevard; Travel approximately 0.7 miles; Turn left on Bayfront Drive; Travel approximately 300 feet on Bayfront Drive; Arrive at 239 Bayfront Drive, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 It is our intent to ask the County to allow us to reduce the required front yard setback from 27.83 feet to 12 feet and to reduce the required rear yard setback from 30 feet to 27.07 feet for a single-family residential dwelling on the aforementioned property. You are encouraged to contact me at 239.337.3850 or zliebetreu@ralaw.com in the event you would like additional explanation or further information. In any event, please be advised that we are interested in assuring you that our request should not adversely affect your property interest. Very truly yours, ROETZEL & ANDRESS, LPA Zachary A. Liebetreu Page 267 of 271 1 NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 LEGAL1 LEGAL2 LEGAL3 LEGAL4 FOLIO ADDRESSTYPE 239 BAYFRONT LLC % DAN DAVIS 2445 BROWN RD ORION, MI 48359---0 BAYFRONT GARDENS LOT 12 AND THAT PORT LOT 13 DESC AS: BEG SE CNR LOT 13, N 53DEG W TO MHWL AND PT CALLED POINT "A",23095001208 U BAYFRONT GARDEN'S ASSOC INC % STERLING PROP SERVICES LLC 27800 OLD 41 RD BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---5607 BAYFRONT GARDENS LOT 34 (STREET-BAYFRONT DRIVE)OR 1512 PG 1255 23095003400 U BAYFRONT GARDEN'S ASSOC INC C/O KRINSKY PROPERTY MGMT PO BOX 7335 NAPLES, FL 34101---7335 BAYFRONT GARDENS LOT 35 (PRESERVE AREA) OR 1512 PG 1255 23095003507 U COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 06 48 25 UNREC TRS M & N (LELY BAREFOOT PUD)DESC IN OR'S 1397 PG 2170 & 1459 PG 760 LESS OR 1459 PG 752 146.66 AC 00141842305 U COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 LELY BAREFOOT BEACH UNIT FIVE TRACT P 54775121325 U DEVI-ESQUE LLC 920 ST STEPHENS GREEN OAK BROOK, IL 60523---0 BAYFRONT GARDENS LOT 8 23095000801 U GROSS, ANDREW M & GINA LEAKE 242 BAREFOOT BEACH BLVD BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---8505 BAYFRONT GARDENS LOT 10 23095001004 U GUDZIAK, MARKO R & ROMA M 3235 INTERLAKEN STREET WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48323---0 BAYFRONT GARDENS LOT 15 23095001509 U MALDONADO, NELSON A ROMINA MALDONADO 240 BAREFOOT BEACH BLVD BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 BAYFRONT GARDENS LOT 9 23095000908 U OWENS, DAVID G & SUSAN S 241 BAYFRONT DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---8548 BAYFRONT GARDENS LOT 11 23095001101 U TOMARCHIO JR, JOSEPH MARY ANNA TOMARCHIO 2556 ESCADA DR NAPLES, FL 34109---0 BAYFRONT GARDENS LOT 14 23095001402 U TUCKER, WILLIAM M MAURA LEAHY-TUCKER 237 BAYFRONT DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 BAYFRONT GARDENS LOT 13, LESS THAT PORT DESC AS: BEG SE CNR LOT 13, N 53DEG W TO MHWL AND PT CALLED POINT "A", RETURN TO 23095001305 U Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA. Petition: PL20240001811 | Buffer: 150' | Date: 7/3/2025 | Site Location: 23095001208 Page 268 of 271 Page 269 of 271 1 John Kelly From:John Kelly Sent:Wednesday, August 27, 2025 1:10 PM To:John Kelly Subject:VA-PL20240001811 - 239 Bayfront Dr - Public Hearing Sign Posting 08262025 Attachments:Photo 1.jpg; Photo 2.jpg I, John Kelly, posted a Public Notice sign to the front of the subject property on Tuesday, August 26, 2025, at approximately 1:35 P.M. as depicted within the attached photos. Respectfully, John Kelly Planner III Zoning Office:239-252-5719 2800 N Horseshoe Dr. Naples, Florida 34104 John.Kelly@colliercountyfl.gov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Page 270 of 271 Page 271 of 271