HEX Agenda 08/28/2025COLLIER COUNTY
Hearing Examiner
AGENDA
Conference Room 609/610
Growth Management Community Development
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
August 28, 2025
1:00 PM
Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP
Hearing Examiner
Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes unless otherwise waived by the Hearing Examiner. Persons
Wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the hearing report packets must have that material
submitted to County staff at Ailyn.Padron@CollierCountyFL.gov 10 days prior to the Hearing. All materials used
during presentation at the hearing will become a permanent part of the record.
Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner will need a record of the proceedings
pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which
record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Decisions of the Hearing
Examiner are final unless appealed to the Board of County Commissioners.
Hearing Procedures will provide for presentation by the Applicant, presentation by staff, public comment and
applicant rebuttal. The Hearing Examiner will render a decision within 30 days. Persons wishing to receive a copy
of the decision by mail may supply County staff with their name, address, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope
for that purpose. Persons wishing to receive an electronic copy of the decision may supply their email address.
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Review of Agenda
3. Advertised Public Hearing
3.A. Petition No. BD-PL20240013776 – 10 Pelican St. E- Request for a 12-foot boat dock
extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1
of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways greater than 100 feet in
width, to allow a boat docking facility protruding a total of 32 feet into a waterway that is 840±
feet wide, pursuant to LDC Section 5.03.06.H. The subject property is located at 10 Pelican
Street East and is further described as Lot 17 and the east 10 feet of Lot 16, Isles of Capri No.
1, in Section 5, Township 52 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator:
John Kelly, Planner III] Commission District 1 (2025-2569)
4. New Business
5. Old Business
Page 1 of 99
6. Public Comments
7. Adjourn
Page 2 of 99
8/28/2025
Item # 3.A
ID# 2025-2569
Petition No. BD-PL20240013776 – 10 Pelican St. E- Request for a 12-foot boat dock extension from the maximum
permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for
waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow a boat docking facility protruding a total of 32 feet into a waterway
that is 840± feet wide, pursuant to LDC Section 5.03.06.H. The subject property is located at 10 Pelican Street East and
is further described as Lot 17 and the east 10 feet of Lot 16, Isles of Capri No. 1, in Section 5, Township 52 South, Range
26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commission District 1
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Staff Report 08052025
2. Attachment A - Proposed Site and Dock Plans
3. Attachment B - Map of Specific Purpose Survey
4. Attachment C - Partial Permit File, PRFH20240728089
5. Attachment D - Applicant’s Backup; Application and Supporting Documents
6. Attachment E - Public Hearing Posting 08122025
Page 3 of 99
BD-PL20240013776 – 10 Pelican St E
August 5, 2025
Page 1 of 8
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION
GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
HEARING DATE: AUGUST 28, 2025
SUBJECT: BD-PL20240013776, 10 PELICAN STREET EAST - BOAT DOCK
PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT:
Warbler, LLC / Jean M. Unruh Gift Trust Jeff Rogers
Victor O. Unruh, Trustee Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.
1908 Unruh Ct. 3584 Exchange Ave.
New Albany, IN 47150 Naples, FL 34104
REQUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner requests a 12-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of
20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for
waterways 100 feet or greater in width, to allow a new boat dock facility protruding a total of 32
feet into a waterway that is 840± feet wide, pursuant to LDC Section 5.03.06.H.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject property is located at 10 Pelican Street East, also known as Lot 17 and the east 10
feet of Lot 16, Isles of Capri No. 1, in Section 5, Township 52 South, Range 26 East, Collier
County, Florida. (See location map on the following page)
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The subject property, comprising 0.22 acres, is located within a Residential-Single Family – 4
(RSF-4) zoning district. A single-family residence is being constructed per Building Permit No.
PRFH20240728089. The property has approximately 85 feet of seawalled shoreline with
sporadic riprap, adjacent to the Big Marco River located within the Rookery Bay Aquatic
Preserve. The petitioner desires to construct a new residential dock facility comprising a finger
pier with two slips, each with a boatlift, to accommodate two 24-foot vessels. The requested 32-
foot protrusion is measured from the property line, which is landward of the mean high-water
line, and is necessary due to water depths; 15-foot side setbacks are also required.
Page 4 of 99
BD-PL20240013776 – 10 Pelican St E
August 5, 2025
Page 2 of 8
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North: Pelican Street East (Right-of-Way), then a single-family dwelling located within a
Residential Single Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district
East: A Single-family dwelling located within a Residential Single Family-4 (RSF-4)
zoning district
South: Big Marco River is located within an agricultural zoning district and within a
Special Treatment Overlay (A-ST)
West: A Single-family dwelling located within a Residential Single Family-4 (RSF-4)
zoning district
Page 5 of 99
BD-PL20240013776 – 10 Pelican St E
August 5, 2025
Page 3 of 8
Aerial – Collier County GIS
Page 6 of 99
BD-PL20240013776 – 10 Pelican St E
August 5, 2025
Page 4 of 8
Aerial – Collier County GIS
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION:
Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of
this request. The property is located adjacent to an ST overlay zone (Marco River), which will
require an ST-permit for the proposed docking facilities before issuance of any building permits.
The proposed docking facilities will be constructed waterward of the existing seawalled
shoreline. The shoreline does not contain native vegetation. A survey provided by the applicant
found no submerged resources in the area 200 feet beyond the proposed docking facility.
(Submerged Resource Survey exhibit sheet 9 of 10).
This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council Board (EAC) review, because
this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in
Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and
Ordinances.
Page 7 of 99
BD-PL20240013776 – 10 Pelican St E
August 5, 2025
Page 5 of 8
STAFF ANALYSIS:
In accordance with LDC Section 5.03.06.H., the Collier County Hearing Examiner shall approve,
approve with conditions, or deny a dock facility extension request based on certain criteria. In
order for the Hearing Examiner to approve this request, at least four of the five primary criteria
and four of the six secondary criteria must be met:
Primary Criteria:
1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in
relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the
subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier
islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the
property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be
no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling
unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be
appropriate.)
Criterion met. The subject property is located within an RSF-4 zoning district and will
support a single-family dwelling for which the LDC allows two boat slips. The proposed
dock has been designed to accommodate two 24-foot vessels, one to be on a 16-foot by
16-foot lift and the other on a 16-foot by 20-foot lift.
2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the
general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner’s application is
unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner’s application
and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching
and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.)
Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The proposed boat dock extension is
necessary to extend out to sufficient water depths, which is limited by the State’s aquatic
preserve rules on the allowed overall protrusion being limited to terminating at the -4‘
MLW contour line. Additionally, the aquatic preserve will not allow for any dredging
activities, which would limit the overall protrusion to reach greater water depths or create
sufficient depths to reduce the overall proposed dock protrusion.” Zoning staff concurs.
3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation
within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not
intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel, thus impeding vessel
traffic in the channel.)
Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The proposed docking facility design is
consistent with numerous other existing docking facilities along the subject and adjacent
waterways. As proposed, the dock and boatlifts will not impact navigation within the
subject waterway, nor will they alter the existing ingress/egress to both adjacent
neighboring docks and the associated slips. There is a marked channel within the Marco
River which provides safe navigation between the markers, which are just waterward of
Page 8 of 99
BD-PL20240013776 – 10 Pelican St E
August 5, 2025
Page 6 of 8
the existing docking facilities. Based on this, as proposed, there are no new impacts to
any navigation as a result of the proposed project.” Zoning staff concurs.
4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width
of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width
between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility
should maintain the required percentages.)
Criterion met. The approximate waterway width is 840 feet. The requested total dock
protrusion is 32 feet, which is under 4 percent of the width of the waterway. The clear
distance between the subject dock facility and that on the opposite shore is 703 feet;
therefore, 83.81 percent of the waterway is open for navigation.
5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the
facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should
not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.)
Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The proposed docking facility design and
overall location will not interfere with the existing adjacent dock facilities. As proposed,
the dock will be within the allowed buildable area by providing the required setbacks, and
therefore, the views into the subject waterway by the adjacent property owners will not be
impacted, nor will their access to their docks. Zoning staff concurs.
Secondary Criteria:
1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the
subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location
of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related
to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline
configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.)
Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The special conditions taking into
consideration with the proposed dock layout are the two adjacent existing grandfathered
docking facilities [on either side of the subject property]. Both these docks extend out
past the 20-foot mark and the -4’ MLW contour line, limiting access to an angled or
shore parallel dock design. Additionally, both adjacent docks are within the required 15-
foot setback line, further limiting any dock/slip design that would allow the proposed
dock to reduce the overall proposed protrusion and still provide safe access.” Given the
agent’s explanation of the State’s aquatic preserve rules, Zoning staff concurs.
2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel
for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck
area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive
deck area.)
Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The proposed docking facility has been
fully minimized to the fullest extent possible and still provides deck area for routine.
Page 9 of 99
BD-PL20240013776 – 10 Pelican St E
August 5, 2025
Page 7 of 8
maintenance, safe access, as well as recreational activities like fishing, plus storage for
these activities, the dock provides. The total over-water square footage is 899 square
feet.” Zoning staff concurs.
3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in
combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject
property’s linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should
be maintained.)
Criterion not met. The proposed dock facility has been designed for mooring two 24-
foot vessels. The total shoreline at this location is 85 feet. The total length of vessels is 48
feet, which exceeds the 50 percent threshold.
4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of
neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the
view of a neighboring property owner.)
Criterion met. The applicant’s agent states: “The existing on-site conditions consist of
no docking facility, but both adjacent neighboring property owners have docks along the
subject property shoreline. As proposed, the dock has been designed within the
designated setbacks and is consistent with the other existing boat docks on the subject
waterway. Based on this, it’s our opinion that there are no new impacts to either the
adjacent property owner or their current view of the subject waterway. Additionally, this
is a boating community; therefore, docks are all part of the overall atmosphere in this
community.” Zoning staff concurs.
5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass
beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(I) of the LDC must be
demonstrated.)
Criterion met. There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring
properties within 200-feet of the existing dock structure.
6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection
requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance
with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.)
Criterion is not applicable. Criterion not applicable. The provisions of the Collier
County Manatee Protection Plan do not apply to single-family dock facilities except for
those within the seawalled basin of Port of the Islands; the subject property is not located
within Port of the Islands.
Staff analysis finds this request complies with five of the five primary criteria. With respect to
the six secondary criteria, one of the criteria is found to be not applicable; the request meets four
of the remaining five secondary criteria.
CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS:
Page 10 of 99
BD-PL20240013776 – 10 Pelican St E
August 5, 2025
Page 8 of 8
There are no concurrent land use applications under review at the present time.
APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION:
As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an
aggrieved party may appeal such final action. Such appeal shall be filed per Section 2-88 of the
Collier County Code of Ordinances within 30 days of the Decision by the Hearing Examiner. An
aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of
Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that the petition has been approved by
the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at
his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the
approval authorization shall be at their own risk.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above findings, the staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner APPROVE
Petition BD-PL20240013776, allow for the permitting and construction of the proposed dock
facility as depicted within the plans contained in Attachment A, subject to the following
Condition of Approval:
• A Certificate of Completion for the requested accessory dock facility may not be issued
until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the principal structure.
Attachments:
A) Proposed Site and Dock Plans
B) Map of Specific Purpose Survey
C) Partial Permit File, PRFH20240728089
D) Applicant’s Backup; Application and Supporting Documents
E) Public Hearing Sign Posting
Page 11 of 99
STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 25.976580<> LONGITUDE:W -81.729993SITE ADDRESS:<> 10 PELICAN ST E NAPLES, FL 34113Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg LOCATION MAP 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042-052610 PELICAN ST ELOCATION MAP52RMJ---06-10-25----SHEETS 04-06,10----RMJ----01 OF 10COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF MEXICOGULF OF MEXICO8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTYPage 12 of 99
NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg 1952 AERIAL 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042-052610 PELICAN ST E1952 AERIAL52-------------------02 OF 10·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING. INC."06-17-24-1.60'+0.43'85'0840'PROPERTYBOUNDARYPage 13 of 99
-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.7-1.5-2.0-1.5-1.5-1.5-2.0-1.2-2.0-0.2-1.6-2.7-4.0NESW0153060SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,10 PELICAN ST ENAPLESFL34113Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042-052610 PELICAN ST EEXISTING CONDITIONS52-------------------03 OF 10·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING. INC."06-17-24-1.60'+0.43'85'0840'EXISTINGSEAWALLRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARY85'EXISTING SPORADIC RIPRAP-4' MLWCONTOURLINEEXISTINGADJACENTDOCKEXISTINGADJACENTDOCK20.1'EXISTINGADJACENTLIFT PILES7.5'8.7'20.7'11.7'12'85'115'
115'Page 14 of 99
p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg 6/10/2025NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg DOCK PLAN - DIMENSIONS 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042RMJ052610 PELICAN ST EDOCK PLAN - DIMENSIONS52----06-10-25----JR----REVISED LIFT----04 OF 10PILE COUNTTYPESIZEQUANTITYWOOD PILE10"6WOOD PILE12"8PILES IN WATER IMPACTS = 10 SF (QTY: 14)EXISTINGSEAWALLRIPARIANLINERIPARIAN LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARY16' x 16'BOAT LIFT30'5'TERMINALPLATFORM(149 SF)-4' MLW CONTOUR LINEEXISTINGADJACENTDOCKEXISTING SPORADIC RIPRAP16' X 20'BOAT LIFT16'20'12'2' x 16' CATWALK16'16'31'
32'4'
24'24'22'22'25'·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE:"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING. INC."06-17-24-1.60'+0.43'85'0840'21721732'Page 15 of 99
-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.7-1.5-2.0-1.5-1.5-1.5-2.0-1.2-2.0-0.2-1.6-2.7-4.0p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg 6/10/2025NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETTERMINAL PLATFORMTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg DOCK PLAN - DEPTHS 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042RMJ052610 PELICAN ST EDOCK PLAN - DEPTHS52----06-10-25----JR----REVISED LIFT----05 OF 10EXISTINGSEAWALLRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYBOAT LIFT-4' MLW CONTOUR LINEEXISTING SPORADIC RIPRAPAA06BOAT LIFT·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE:"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING. INC."06-17-24-1.60'+0.43'85'0840'21721732'Page 16 of 99
-4.0'-
2
.
0
'0248SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg CROSS SECTION AA 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042RMJ052610 PELICAN ST ECROSS SECTION AA52----06-10-25----JR----ADDED VESSEL----06 OF 10BIGMARCORIVERFIXEDDOCK16' BOAT LIFTMHW = +0.43' NAVDMLW =-1.60' NAVDALL PILES TO BEWRAPPED FROM 12"ABOVE MHWL TO 6"BELOW SUBSTRATE36"EXISTINGSEAWALL32' PROTRUSION FROMPROPERTY LINEFIXEDACCESSDOCKCATWALK4'PROPERTYLINEPage 17 of 99
-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.7-1.5-2.0-1.5-1.5-1.5-2.0-1.2-2.0-0.2-1.6-2.7-4.0NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg ADJACENT DOCK 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042-052610 PELICAN ST EADJACENT DOCK52-------------------07 OF 10PROPERTYLINENOTE:THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATEAND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.32'
70'
63'
56'
66'
54'
82'
71'
71'
147'
47'
50'
34'
51'
33'
29'
43'20'20'Page 18 of 99
-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.7-1.5-2.0-1.5-1.5-1.5-2.0-1.2-2.0-0.2-1.6-2.7-4.0NESW03060120SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg ST OVERLAY 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042-052610 PELICAN ST EST OVERLAY52-------------------08 OF 10STOVERLAYPROPERTYLINEPage 19 of 99
NESW0204080SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042-052610 PELICAN ST ESUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY52-------------------09 OF 10TYPICAL DIVE TRANSECTNO SEAGRASSES WEREOBSERVED GROWINGWITHIN 200 FT OF THEPROPOSED PROJECTTRANSECTPROPERTYLINE200'200'10' O.C.Page 20 of 99
NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg WIDTH OF WATERWAY 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042RMJ052610 PELICAN ST EWIDTH OF WATERWAY52----06-10-25----JR----REVISED DIMENSION----10 OF 10NOTE:THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATEAND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.PROPERTYLINE841'
703'
840'Page 21 of 99
Page 22 of 99
PRFH2024072808901
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PERMIT
PERMIT #: PRFH2024072808901 PERMIT TYPE: Building
DATE ISSUED: October 06, 2024
BUILDING CODE IN EFFECT: FBC 8th Edition 2023
JOB ADDRESS: 10 Pelican ST E, Naples
FOLIO #:
JOB DESCRIPTION: Construction of a new single family home. Roof-Tile. Ref PRROW20240728090
10 PELICAN ST E, Naples, lot 16
OWNER INFORMATION:
WARBLER LLC
1908 UNRUH CT
NEW ALBANY, IN 47150
AREA OF WORK (SQFT): 6142
SETBACKS:
FRONT: 25' REAR: 25' P / 10? A LEFT: 7.5' RIGHT: 7.5'
FLOOD ZONE: VE
SEWER: Septic
WATER: Existing
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION:CERTIFICATE #:
LUXURY HOMES OF SW FLORIDA, INC.
870 BALD EAGLE DR STE 1B
MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145
(239) 293-3627
LCC20240000682
SUB CONTRACTOR INFORMATION:
EC AIR PRO, INC
1110 NE PINE ISLAND RD 11
CAPE CORAL, FL 33909
(239) 574-4700
AR BEST PLUMBING LLC
2741 12TH AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120
(239) 227-3776
A-PLUS ROOFING AND WATERPROOFING LLC
2336 CLEVELAND AVE SUITE D
FORT MYERS, FL 33901
(239) 220-2020
PL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR LLC
4690 25TH AVE SW
NAPLES, FL 34116
(239) 331-9740
Page 23 of 99
PRFH2024072808901
INSPECTION JOB CARD
To schedule inspections call 239-252-3726
or visit https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb
SETBACKS:
FRONT:25'REAR:25' P /
10? A
LEFT:7.5'RIGHT:7.5'SPECIAL:FLOOD
ZONE:
FZVE
INSPECTION OUTCOME COMMENTS
101 - Pile Caps
102 - Grade Beam To include the utility footing rebar (UFR)
103 - Floating Slab
104 - Tie Beam
106 - Columns
107 -
Truss/Sheathing/Bucks
108 - Framing All rough trade inspections must be passed prior to scheduling.
109 - Insulation
111 - Dry-in/Flashing
115 - Building Final
119 - Fill Cells
121 - Elevated Structural
Deck
124 - Steel In Stairs
134 - Roofing Final
136 - Impact Glass
151 - Shearwall/Nailing
152 - Shearwall/Water
Barrier
153 - Shearwall/Stucco Lath
154 - Soffit Coverings In
progress
Please do NOT complete Soffit installation prior to inspection.
200 - Plumbing
Underground
201 - Plumbing Rough-in When applicable a shower pan liner test is required.
202 - Plumbing Stack
203 - Sewer Tap
Page 24 of 99
PRFH2024072808901
204 - Plumbing Final
300 - A/C Rough
301 - A/C Final
501 - Electrical Rough
502 - Electrical Final
505 - Temporary Power
Residential
508 - TV/Telephone Rough
509 - TV/Telephone Final
801 - Site Drainage Type II Stormwater Plan. Signed & Sealed by PE.
802 - Landscaping
805 - Septic in Progress
810 - Exotic Vegetation
Removal
813 - Final Septic
814 - Erosion/Silt The 814 - Erosion/Silt must be passed before any other inspections
are scheduled.
OPEN CONDITIONS
Condition Type:Condition Description:
Informational
NOTICE OF CLEARING RESTRICTIONS: The issuance of a building permit for a single-family dwelling allows up to
one (1) acre of native vegetation to be cleared. Clearing more than one (1) acre may be allowed for accessory
structures and requires a separate Vegetation Removal Permit. Properties located in the following zoning
district overlays may not be allowed to clear one (1) acre: Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMU), Big Cypress
Area of Concern (ACSC), and Special Treatment Overlay (ST). There may be additional restrictions related to
clearing native vegetation and impacts to wetlands or protected species found on the property. State and
Federal agency permits may be required. Contact the Growth Management Department?s Environmental
Services at (239) 252-2400 for additional information.
CO Hold
CO Hold Address or Folio (will, may) change, verify location is correct with addressing prior to Final Typing of Permit
Informational - All Auxiliary Permits must obtain Certificate of Completions (C.C.)
- Satisfy all Required Conditions, including but not limited to approval of uploaded documents.
- Payment of All Outstanding Fees
Inspection Hold Notice of Commencement: Upload to the condition on the portal.
Informational Use the form located at
https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=105797&t=638403984984558370 to request
Permit extensions, cancellations, and changes/withdrawals of Contractors, Subcontractors and Qualifiers.
Instructions are provided with the form. Right-of-Way (ROW) and Well permits may only use this process for
cancellations. Change/withdrawal of contractor does not apply to self-issued permits. Contact Building Permit
Resolution Services at 239-252-2493 for assistance completing the form. Submit the form by clicking the
Page 25 of 99
PRFH2024072808901
Browse button below.
Informational BDT ? Blower Door Test will be uploadable after the PASS of the 109 insulation inspection.
Informational Energy Calculation Summary Sheet will be uploadable after the PASS of the 109 insulation inspection.
Informational FEMA - All equipment must be above flood plus one foot. Any materials used below flood level must comply
with FEMA regulations
Informational A Survey is required and must verify that improvement(s) meet setbacks, easements, and elevation
requirements per Chapter 62, Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Throughout the duration of the
permit, please review the survey conditions for when to upload the survey.
CO Hold Soil Compaction Test. Upload to the condition on the portal.
CO Hold Any required County impact fees will be due prior to issuance of a temporary or final Certificate of Occupancy
CO Hold A separate permit is required for:
- Propane Tank
- Pool
- Planter Wall and Pool Stemwall
CO Hold This building permit has a Type II stormwater management plan, signed and sealed by a registered Florida
Professional Engineer as was reviewed by Development Review. Prior to scheduling the 801 inspection, please
upload the signed and sealed stormwater certification letter to the condition in the portal. If you have further
questions, please contact Engineering Services at 239-252-2417.
CO Hold At the time of permit application, the permitted structure is in the special flood hazard area. An Under
Construction Elevation Certificate is required within 10 days of passing a 103 or 133 inspection of slab or other
foundation system. Prior to obtaining County approval of the Under Construction Elevation Certificate, the
permit holder?s construction activities are at his/her own risk. Under Construction Elevation Certificates must
verify the slab meets minimum elevations per the Florida Building Code and Chapter 62, Collier County Code of
Laws and Ordinances (e.g., BFE +1 or 18? above the crown of the road, whichever is higher, and the elevation
established by the SFWMD permit).
CO Hold BFE= COASTAL AE-10.00 ft NAVD, Per Plans: Crown of Road (CoR)= Not Provided, Proposed Ground Living Level
FFE= 11.00 ft NAVD, Next Living Level FFE= 25.50 ft NAVD (Pg. A-2), Garage's Lowest FFE= 7.00 ft NAVD with 3
each CSBA816 Flood Vents (305 sf ea of capacity) in oppossite walls to vent 772 SF of garage; All Equipment
Pads to be BFE+1 foot minimum, Break away walls provided but missing structural detail. Elevator below Flood
complying with FEMA Techincal Bulletin 4 & ASCE 24 provided (Pg.A-4), Materials Below Flood Note provided
(Pg.A-4). FrancoJohann 09/27/2024 5:52 PM
CO Hold Sub Contractor (Septic) Upload to the condition on portal.
CO Hold All Ancillary permits must be FINAL and ALL conditions on the permit must be resolved prior to Curbside Solid
Waste Collection fee being added to the permit.
NOTE: If you are unable to schedule your inspection, please contact the inspection desk at 252-2400.
NOISE ORDINANCE: Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances 54-92(f) Construction Sound. NOISE LIMITATIONS are
in effect at all times. Work permitted, RESIDENTIAL Areas – 6:30 AM to 7:00 PM Monday thru Saturday; NON-RESIDENTIAL
Areas (more than 500 feet from Residential Area) 6:00AM to 8:00PM Monday thru Saturday. No Work on Sundays or Holidays.
RADIOS, LOUDSPEAKERS, ETC. – Must not disturb peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring inhabitants. FREE CABLE
LOCATIONS – Call 48 Hours prior to digging/FPL 434-1222/UTS 1-800-542-0088/PalmerCATV 783-0638 and all other applicable
utilities.
Per currently adopted building code ordinance, as it may be amended, all work must comply with all applicable laws, codes,
ordinances, and any additional stipulations or conditions of this permit. This permit expires if work authorized by the permit is not
commenced within six (6) months from the date of issuance of the permit. Additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to the
commencement of construction may be imposed. Permittee(s) further understands that any contractor that may be employed must
Page 26 of 99
PRFH2024072808901
be a licensed contractor and that the structure must not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
NOTICE: PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS PRODUCTS OR THE DEMOLITION OF A STRUCTURE, FEDERAL
AND STATE LAWS REQUIRE THE PERMITTEE (EITHER THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR) TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF
THE INTENDED WORK TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEP). FOR MORE
INFORMATION, CONTACT DEP AT (239) 344-5600.
NOTICE: In addition to the conditions of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be
found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as
water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies.
WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF
COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS
TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED
AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND
TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY
BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT.
Page 27 of 99
Page 28 of 99
Boathouse Establishment Petition or Boat Dock Facility Extension (BD) 3/24/24 Page 1 of 7
Planning and Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400
www.colliercountyfl.gov
Need Help?
GMCD Public Portal
Online Payment Guide
E-Permitting Guides
THIS PETITION IS FOR (check one or both, if applicable): BOATHOUSE DOCK EXTENSION
Name of Property Owner(s):
Name of Applicant if different than owner:
Address: City: State: ZIP:
Telephone: Cell:
E-Mail Address:
Name of Agent:
Firm:
Address: City: State: ZIP:
Telephone: Cell:
E-Mail Address:
Section/Township/Range: / / Property ID Number:
Subdivision:
Unit: Block: Lot:
Address/ General Location of Subject Property:
Current Zoning and Land Use of Subject Property:
APPLICANT INFORMATION
PROPERTY LOCATION
BOATHOUSE ESTABLISHMENT PETITION OR BOAT DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION
Land Development Code Section 5.03.06
Chapter 3 B.1 or B.2 of the Administrative Code
BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY
AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS.
Page 29 of 99
Boathouse Establishment Petition or Boat Dock Facility Extension (BD) 3/24/24 Page 2 of 7
Zoning Land Use
N
S
E
W
Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other
pertinent information):
1. Water Width: ft. Measurement from: plat survey visual estimate
other(specify):
2. Total Property Water Frontage:
ft.
3. Setbacks: Provided: ft.
Required: ft.
4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water:
ft.
5. Number and Lengths of Vessels to Use Facility:
1. ft. 2. ft. 3. ft. 4. ft.
6. If applicable, the distance between dock facilities per the Land Development Code section 5.03.06 H.1.d.
ft.
7. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total
protrusion into the waterway of each:
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
SITE INFORMATION
Page 30 of 99
Boathouse Establishment Petition or Boat Dock Facility Extension (BD) 3/24/24 Page 3 of 7
1. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are one (1) acre or larger in size, the applicant
shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property?
Acres
2. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications:
To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property
within the last year? Yes No (If yes, please provide a copy.)
The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining
its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following
criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for
the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary
criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a
narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions.
1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the
waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be
made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to
and from the property.
(The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-
family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips
may be appropriate.)
2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type,
and draft as that described in the petitioner’s application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT).
(The petitioner’s application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch
and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.)
3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent
marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable
channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.)
4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25% of the width of the waterway,
and whether or not a minimum of 50% of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of
the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.)
5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not
interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted
neighboring docks.)
DOCK EXTENSION PRIMARY CRITERIA
Page 31 of 99
Boathouse Establishment Petition or Boat Dock Facility Extension (BD) 3/24/24 Page 4 of 7
1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or
waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be
at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement,
shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.)
2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/ unloading
and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The
facility should not use excessive deck area.)
3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by
the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property’s linear waterfront footage.(The applicable maximum
percentage should be maintained.)
4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring
waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.)
5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are
present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 J must be demonstrated.)
6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection
5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.)
The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06 F, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining
its recommendation to the decision maker. The decision maker will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the
decision to approve or deny a particular Boathouse request. In order for the request to be approved, all of the
criteria must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions.
1. Minimum side setback requirement: Fifteen feet.
2. Maximum protrusion into waterway: Twenty-five percent of canal width or 20 feet, whichever is less. The roof alone
may overhang no more than 3 feet into the waterway beyond the maximum protrusion and/or side setbacks.
3. Maximum height; Fifteen feet as measured from the top of the seawall or bank, whichever is more restrictive, to the
peak or highest elevation of the roof.
4. Maximum number of boathouses and covered structures per site: One.
5. All boathouses and covered structures shall be completely open on all 4 sides.
6. Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on principal structure or may be a palm
frond “chickee” style. A single-family dwelling unit must be constructed on the subject lot prior to, or simultaneously
with, the construction of any boathouse or covered dock structure.
7. The boathouse or covered structure must be so located as to minimize the impact on the view of the adjacent
neighbors to the greatest extent practical.
BOATHOUSE CRITERIA
DOCK EXTENSION SECONDARY CRITERIA
Page 32 of 99
Boathouse Establishment Petition or Boat Dock Facility Extension (BD) 3/24/24 Page 5 of 7
Complete the following for all registered Homeowner / Civic Association(s) that could be affected by this
petition and located within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Provide additional sheets if necessary.
Information can be found on the Civic Associations and Communities page on the Board of County
Commissioner’s website. Applicant is responsible for and shall confirm the current mailing addresses for each
association as registered by the Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations.
Name of Homeowner/Civic Association:
Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP:
Name of Homeowner/Civic Association:
Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP:
Name of Homeowner/Civic Association:
Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP:
Name of Homeowner/Civic Association:
Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP:
Name of Homeowner/Civic Association:
Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP:
ASSOCIATIONS
Page 33 of 99
Boathouse Establishment Petition or Boat Dock Facility Extension (BD) 3/24/24 Page 6 of 7
The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting, and at time
of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the
application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets
attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted or processed.
REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT
REQUIRED
Completed Application (download current form from County website)
Property Ownership Disclosure Form
Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized
Completed Addressing Checklist
Site plan illustration with the following:
•Lot dimensions;
•Required setbacks for the dock facility;
•Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline
(bank, seawall, or rip-rap revetment);
•Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed facility;
•Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located;
•Distance of navigable channel;
•Illustration of the contour of the property; and
•Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view.
•Roof Structure on Dock
Signed and sealed survey
Chart of site waterway
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS:
•Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all
materials electronically to the designated project manager.
•Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required.
Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for:
Dock Extension
Boathouse
Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code
Page 34 of 99
Boathouse Establishment Petition or Boat Dock Facility Extension (BD) 3/24/24 Page 7 of 7
PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS:
Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment:
Executive Director
Historical Review:
Addressing: Parks and Recreation:
City of Naples Planning Director: School District (Residential Components):
Conservancy of SWFL: Other:
Emergency Management:
Other:
FEE REQUIREMENTS:
Boat Dock Extension / Boathouse Petition fee: $1,500.00
Pre-Application Meeting fee $500.00
Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00
If applicable, an additional fee for Property Owner Notifications will be billed to the applicant after Hearing
Examiner hearing date. (Variable)
All fees are collected at the time of application. Property Notification Letters, if required by The Land Development Code, will be invoiced
after the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners.
As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this
submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this
petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re-submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee.
Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date
Printed Name
*The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to:
Growth Management Community Development Department | GMCD Public Portal:
https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb
Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov
Page 35 of 99
Addressing Checklist 6/14/2024 Page 1 of 2
Growth Management Community Development • Operations & Regulatory Management
2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • www.colliercountyfl.gov/
Addressing Checklist
GMCD Public Portal
Land Development Code
Administrative Code
Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with a * are
required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project.
Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after
that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified.
*Name of Owner/Agent:
Firm [if agent]:
*Address:*City:*State:*ZIP:
*Telephone:Cell:Fax:
*E-Mail Address:
*Folio (Property ID) Number(s) of the subject property or properties [Attach list if necessary]:
*Legal Description of subject property or properties [Attach list if necessary]:
Street Address(es) where applicable, if already assigned:
Applicant Contact Information
Location Information
Page 36 of 99
Collier County
Addressing Checklist 6/14/2024 Page 2 of 2
Growth Management Community Development • Operations & Regulatory Management
2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • www.colliercountyfl.gov/
Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by
the Addressing Official. Pre-approval of project name and/or street name may be requested by contacting us at
GMD_Addressing@colliercountyfl.gov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal.
Current Project Name:
Proposed Project Name:
Proposed Street Name:
Latest Approved Project Number [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####]
Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include.
Checkmark the items included with this application:
Requirements for Review: Required:
LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. ☒
List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. ☐
E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre-approved project and/or street names.☐
Project Information
Submittal Requirement Checklist
The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to:
Growth Management Community Development Department | GMCD Portal:
https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb
Questions? Email: Front.Desk@colliercountyfl.gov
Page 37 of 99
Page 38 of 99
Page 39 of 99
Page 40 of 99
Page 41 of 99
Page 42 of 99
I
{
l
I
I
' .l
1 'i :l
I
I
l I
I
l
I
AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION
FOR PETITION NUMBERS($) P La oa. L\ oo l ~ 71 (o
1 / " -k{ of 'fhe. "Ji M Unr o t\ ao~ ~ ,-tr 1 ..v s+-
I, VlG-\o< \AO(UV\ (print name), a OS f1'IA.M,C~viM»\«-\ ti..(, (title, 1 ljt\/d. --A-.
applicable) of ___________ ~ _______ (company, If applicable), swear or affirm f;)./~
under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner~applicantOcontract purchaserOand that:
*Notes:
i. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on
the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this
application and the Land Development Code;
2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter
attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true;
3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours
for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that
4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and
rnstrictions imposed by the ~oved aAtion. ''":"
5. We/I authorize Tu rrtl\, :t~H f tjSSOCAa~ 1 \o( • to act as our/my representative
:., any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above.
• If the applicar;t is a co1poration, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres.
• If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should
typically be s;gned by the Company's "Managing Member."
• If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership.
• If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general
partner' of the named partnership .
.. If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee".
" In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then
use the appropriate format for that ownership.
Under pen;,1\ti2.i; ~;,f pe,·jury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that
the facts steiH! • • ;, ~~ _"l ( ___ a._l f dl.~:)~--
Slgnature Date
ST'.\.TE o::: f ..• ,.t[@Jl\rdi~
COUNTY c+ (IC' i. IIT Fro~ot
Tha foregoing i[,s·::-ur,,ant was acknowleged before me by means of ~physical ~resence or r'.lfnline notarization this
~ day of _J_v \~---' 20~ by (printed name of owner or qualifier) \J \ tfur Llnr UV"\ .
Su·;:;h ;JE:.-~o):, _,.::tay Public must check applicable box:
~ Are personaiiy known to me
[J Has prodL,cea a currem drivers license ------
□ Has producec: . ________ as identification.
Notacy Sigoat,,ce, 4L '4;6 ~
CP\08-C'JA-00! i;_t;\!55
:7.EV 3/4/202()
Page 43 of 99
Page 44 of 99
Page 45 of 99
Page 46 of 99
Page 47 of 99
Page 48 of 99
Page 49 of 99
Page 50 of 99
Page 51 of 99
Page 52 of 99
Page 53 of 99
Page 54 of 99
Page 55 of 99
Page 56 of 99
Page 57 of 99
Page 58 of 99
Page 59 of 99
Page 60 of 99
Page 61 of 99
Page 62 of 99
Page 63 of 99
Page 64 of 99
Page 65 of 99
Page 66 of 99
Page 67 of 99
Page 68 of 99
Page 69 of 99
Page 70 of 99
Page 71 of 99
Page 72 of 99
Narrative Description: The proposed Boat Dock Extension request is to construct a new single-
family docking facility with two boatlifts located at 10 Pelican St. E. on Isles of Capri. The
proposed dock facility will be accessory to a new 2-story single-family residence currently being
constructed, Building Permit No. PRFH20240728089. The subject waterway is the Big Marco
River along the south side of the Isles of Capri. This section of the Big Marco River is considered
state lands which also means in this case is located within the Rookery Bay Aquatic Preserve
and therefore subject to the associated state of Florida aquatic preserve dock rules. The subject
property has approximately 85 linear feet of concrete seawall and sporadic riprap shoreline.
Additionally, the subject plated property line is landward of the mean high-water line therefore
is the most restrictive point and due to shoreline length, the required setbacks are 15-feet from
each property riparian line with Collier County. However, due to being within state lands the
required setbacks are 25-feet with the Department of Environmental Protection which is more
restrictive.
The proposed dock as designed will require a BDE to accommodate the applicant’s 2, 24-foot
LOA vessel. Due to the existing site conditions and being located within the aquatic preserve
the proposed dock will protrude approximately 32-feet from the property line and therefore the
applicant is requesting a 12-foot extension over the allowed 20-feet. The reason for the proposed
overall protrusion is due to shallow water depths which the applicant is not allowed to dredge
being the subject waterway is classified as a natural waterway located within the aquatic
preserve. Dredging is not permitted unless we are able to provide evidence of historic dredging
activities that have occurred on-site which, based on our research and state records, have not
previously occurred. Additionally, due to the two neighboring dock layouts and locations there
were only one dock design option which is to be perpendicular to the seawall with the dock and
associated boat slips.
The subject waterway is approximately 840-foot wide and as proposed the dock and boat lifts
would protrude 4% into the waterway. The subject waterway is a marked waterway but has
sufficient depths throughout allowing for safe navigation between docking facilities. Therefore,
as proposed there are no impacts to navigation expected within the area as a result from the
proposed dock. Furthermore, there are numerous other docking facilities along the same
shoreline that protrude much further than the proposed dock. As proposed, the dock will
provide the required side yard setback being 15-feet with a 25-feet setback being provided from
the east riparian line and a 22-foot setback from the west riparian line which exceeds the county
requirement for lots with 60-feet of shoreline or greater. Also, the adjacent landowner to the
west has signed a setback waiver to allow the dock to encroach into the state required 25-foot
setback.
There are no impacts to any submerged resources, the decking area has been minimized and
still provides sufficient surface area for recreational activities, routine maintenance, and
associated storage. Also, the proposed dock design and overall protrusion are consistent with
the other previously approved docking facilities on the subject waterway as there are not many
docks designs that are allowed due to the more restrictive aquatic preserve rules.
Page 73 of 99
PRIMARY CRITERIA
The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in
determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing
Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a
particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the
request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the
6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response
to the listed criteria and/or questions.
1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in
relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject
property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where
vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number
should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips;
typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged
barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.)
The subject property is zoned for a single-family residential unit which warrants no
more than 2 slips per CC-LDC. The proposed docking facility consists of installing a
new docking facility with two boatlifts, both to accommodate a 24-foot LOA vessel
with one being 16’x16’ and the other is a 16’ x 20’ lift. Each lift will have a 2’x16’
catwalk on the outside. The proposed dock will extend out 32-feet from the plated
property line which is 12-feet of protrusion past the allowed 20-feet, therefore we
are requesting for a 12-foot extension. Additionally, the proposed dock will provide
and exceed the required 15-foot setbacks from both riparian lines and therefore will
not interfere with the adjacent properties as the vessel’s ingress/egress the proposed
boatlifts. As proposed, the docking facility is appropriate for the typical single-
family residential use.
Criterion Met
2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the
general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner’s application is unable to
launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner’s application and survey should
show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s)
described without an extension.)
The proposed boat dock extension is necessary to extend out to sufficient water
depths which is limited by the State’s aquatic preserve rules on the allowed overall
protrusion being limited to terminating at the -4’ MLW contour line. Additionally,
the aquatic preserve will not allow for any new dredging activities which would limit
the overall protrusion to reach greater water depths or create sufficient depths to
reduce the overall proposed dock protrusion.
Page 74 of 99
Based on the owner’s vessel and existing on-site water depths the BDE is needed to
reach sufficient depths as well as to be consistent layout with the two adjacent docks
for ease of access as indicated on the attached BDE exhibits.
Criterion Met
3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation
within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude
into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the
channel.)
The proposed docking facility design is consistent with numerous other existing
docking facilities along the subject and adjacent waterways. As proposed, the dock
and boatlifts will not impact navigation within the subject waterway nor will it alter
the existing ingress/egress to both adjacent neighboring docks and the associated
slips. There is a marked channel within the Marco River which provides safe
navigation between the markers which are just waterward of the existing docking
facilities. Based on this as proposed there are no new impacts to any navigation as a
result from the proposed project.
Criterion Met
4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width
of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width
between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The
facility should maintain the required percentages.)
The approximate waterway width is 840-feet wide. The proposed dock protrusion is
32-feet which is under 4% width of the waterway.
Criterion Met
5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the
facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not
interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.)
The proposed docking facility design and overall location will not interfere with the
existing adjacent docking facilities. As proposed, the dock will be within the allowed
buildable area by providing the and exceeding the Collier County required setbacks
ensuring no impacts to accessing either adjacent docking facility will result from the
proposed dock.
Criterion Met
Page 75 of 99
SECONDARY CRITERIA
1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the
subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the
proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the
property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration,
mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.)
The special conditions taking into consideration with the proposed dock layout are
the two adjacent existing grandfathered docking facilities. Both those docks extend
out past the 20-foot mark and the -4’ MLW contour line limiting access to a angled
or shore parallel dock design. Additionally, both of the adjacent docks are within
the required 15-foot setback line further limiting any dock/slip design that would
allow the proposed dock to reduce the overall proposed protrusion and still provide
safe access.
Criterion Met
2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for
loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not
directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.)
The proposed docking facility and deck area has been minimized to the fullest
extent possible and still provides area for routine maintenance, safe access as well as
recreational activities like fishing plus storage for these activities. The total over-
water square footage is 217 square feet.
Criterion Met
3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in
combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property’s
linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.)
The existing docking facility has been designed with two boatlifts to moor two
vessels, being approximately 24-feet in length. The subject property’s shoreline
length is approximately 85-feet which the proposed vessel is under 42.5-feet as the
PWC’s are not considered vessels by Collier County.
Criterion Met
4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view
of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact
on the view of either property owner.)
The existing on-site conditions consist of no docking facility but both adjacent
neighboring property owners have docks along the subject property shoreline. As
Page 76 of 99
proposed the dock has been designed within the designated setbacks and is
consistent with the other existing boat docks on the subject waterway. Based on this
it’s our opinion that there are no new impacts to either adjacent property owner nor
their current view of the subject waterway. Additionally, this is a boating
community therefore docks are all part of the overall atmosphere in this
community.
Criterion Met
5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If
seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 I must be
demonstrated.)
There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties
within 200’ of the existing dock structure.
Criterion Met
6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection
requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection
5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.)
The proposed work is a single-family dock facility and therefore not subject to
Manatee Protection Requirements.
N/A
Page 77 of 99
STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 25.976580<> LONGITUDE:W -81.729993SITE ADDRESS:<> 10 PELICAN ST E NAPLES, FL 34113Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg LOCATION MAP 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042-052610 PELICAN ST ELOCATION MAP52RMJ---06-10-25----SHEETS 04-06,10----RMJ----01 OF 10COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF MEXICOGULF OF MEXICO8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTYPage 78 of 99
NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg 1952 AERIAL 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042-052610 PELICAN ST E1952 AERIAL52-------------------02 OF 10·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING. INC."06-17-24-1.60'+0.43'85'0840'PROPERTYBOUNDARYPage 79 of 99
-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.7-1.5-2.0-1.5-1.5-1.5-2.0-1.2-2.0-0.2-1.6-2.7-4.0NESW0153060SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,10 PELICAN ST ENAPLESFL34113Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042-052610 PELICAN ST EEXISTING CONDITIONS52-------------------03 OF 10·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING. INC."06-17-24-1.60'+0.43'85'0840'EXISTINGSEAWALLRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARY85'EXISTING SPORADIC RIPRAP-4' MLWCONTOURLINEEXISTINGADJACENTDOCKEXISTINGADJACENTDOCK20.1'EXISTINGADJACENTLIFT PILES7.5'8.7'20.7'11.7'12'85'115'
115'Page 80 of 99
p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg 6/10/2025NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg DOCK PLAN - DIMENSIONS 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042RMJ052610 PELICAN ST EDOCK PLAN - DIMENSIONS52----06-10-25----JR----REVISED LIFT----04 OF 10PILE COUNTTYPESIZEQUANTITYWOOD PILE10"6WOOD PILE12"8PILES IN WATER IMPACTS = 10 SF (QTY: 14)EXISTINGSEAWALLRIPARIANLINERIPARIAN LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARY16' x 16'BOAT LIFT30'5'TERMINALPLATFORM(149 SF)-4' MLW CONTOUR LINEEXISTINGADJACENTDOCKEXISTING SPORADIC RIPRAP16' X 20'BOAT LIFT16'20'12'2' x 16' CATWALK16'16'31'
32'4'
24'24'22'22'25'·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE:"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING. INC."06-17-24-1.60'+0.43'85'0840'21721732'Page 81 of 99
-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.7-1.5-2.0-1.5-1.5-1.5-2.0-1.2-2.0-0.2-1.6-2.7-4.0p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg 6/10/2025NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETTERMINAL PLATFORMTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg DOCK PLAN - DEPTHS 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042RMJ052610 PELICAN ST EDOCK PLAN - DEPTHS52----06-10-25----JR----REVISED LIFT----05 OF 10EXISTINGSEAWALLRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYBOAT LIFT-4' MLW CONTOUR LINEEXISTING SPORADIC RIPRAPAA06BOAT LIFT·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL WATER DEPTHS AND DREDGE ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE:"COURT GREGORY SURVEYING. INC."06-17-24-1.60'+0.43'85'0840'21721732'Page 82 of 99
-4.0'-
2
.
0
'0248SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg CROSS SECTION AA 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042RMJ052610 PELICAN ST ECROSS SECTION AA52----06-10-25----JR----ADDED VESSEL----06 OF 10BIGMARCORIVERFIXEDDOCK16' BOAT LIFTMHW = +0.43' NAVDMLW =-1.60' NAVDALL PILES TO BEWRAPPED FROM 12"ABOVE MHWL TO 6"BELOW SUBSTRATE36"EXISTINGSEAWALL32' PROTRUSION FROMPROPERTY LINEFIXEDACCESSDOCKCATWALK4'PROPERTYLINEPage 83 of 99
-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.7-1.5-2.0-1.5-1.5-1.5-2.0-1.2-2.0-0.2-1.6-2.7-4.0NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg ADJACENT DOCK 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042-052610 PELICAN ST EADJACENT DOCK52-------------------07 OF 10PROPERTYLINENOTE:THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATEAND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.32'
70'
63'
56'
66'
54'
82'
71'
71'
147'
47'
50'
34'
51'
33'
29'
43'20'20'Page 84 of 99
-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.7-1.5-2.0-1.5-1.5-1.5-2.0-1.2-2.0-0.2-1.6-2.7-4.0NESW03060120SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg ST OVERLAY 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042-052610 PELICAN ST EST OVERLAY52-------------------08 OF 10STOVERLAYPROPERTYLINEPage 85 of 99
NESW0204080SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042-052610 PELICAN ST ESUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY52-------------------09 OF 10TYPICAL DIVE TRANSECTNO SEAGRASSES WEREOBSERVED GROWINGWITHIN 200 FT OF THEPROPOSED PROJECTTRANSECTPROPERTYLINE200'200'10' O.C.Page 86 of 99
NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24042.00 - 10 e pelican st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\24042-BDE.dwg WIDTH OF WATERWAY 6/10/2025THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875JRRMJ03-31-2524042RMJ052610 PELICAN ST EWIDTH OF WATERWAY52----06-10-25----JR----REVISED DIMENSION----10 OF 10NOTE:THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATEAND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.PROPERTYLINE841'
703'
840'Page 87 of 99
Page 88 of 99
10 PELICAN ST. E.
NAPLES, FL 34113
FOLIO #52340640000
SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY REPORT
APRIL 2025
PREPARED BY:
Page 89 of 99
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1
2 Objective ............................................................................................................................................. 2
3 Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 3
4 Results ................................................................................................................................................. 4
5 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................... 5
6 Photos .................................................................................................................................................. 6
Page 90 of 99
10 Pelican St. E.
Submerged Resource Survey
April 2025
1
1 INTRODUCTION
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. (THA) has been contracted to provide environmental permitting
services for the proposed dock which includes completing an onsite Submerged Resource Survey
(SRS) at the subject property located at 10 Pelican St. E. in Isles of Capri, FL 34113. The subject
property can be identified by folio #52340640000. This resource survey provides planning
assistance to avoid any potential impacts to submerged resources located in and around the
proposed project to both the property owner and regulating agencies during the review process
for the proposed docking facility.
The subject property consists of a 0.22-acre single-family parcel that can be found on the
southwestern side of Isle of Capri just off the Big Marco River. The subject waterway is considered
a natural waterway that is located within the Rookery Bay Aquatic Preserve which connects
directly to the Gulf of Mexico through the Big Marco River. The upland parcel currently consists
of a single-family residence under construction which has an existing vinyl seawall with scattered
riprap shoreline. The property is neighbored to the east and west by single family residences, to
the south by the subject waterway, and to the north by Pelican St. E.
The SRS was conducted on April 3rd, 2025, between 9:00a.m. and 10:30 a.m. Site conditions on
that day consisted of mostly clear skies with a southeast breeze approximately 5 mph. Water
clarity was good which allowed for approximately 10 inches of visibility. The ambient air
temperature was approximately 88 degrees Fahrenheit with an outgoing tide. High tide occurred
after the site visit at approximately 3:47 p.m. and reached approximately 2.80 feet above the Mean
Low Water Mark. Low tide was achieved during the site visit at approximately 9:54 a.m., reaching
approximately 1.6 feet above the Mean Low Water Mark.
Page 91 of 99
10 Pelican St. E.
Submerged Resource Survey
April 2025
2
2 OBJECTIVE
The objective of the SRS was to identify and locate any existing submerged resources within 200
feet of the proposed dock project. Ordinarily, if seagrasses are present within the vicinity of a
project area, an analysis will be required regarding species, percent coverage, and impacts
projected by the proposed project. The presence of seagrasses may be ample cause for re-
configuration of the design for projects over surface waters in order to minimize impacts. The
general scope of work performed during a typical submerged resource survey is summarized
below:
• THA personnel will conduct a site visit and swim a series of transects within the project
site in order to verify the location of any submerged resources.
• THA personnel will identify submerged resources within the vicinity of the site and
produce an estimate of the percent coverage of any resources found.
• THA personnel will delineate the approximate limits of any submerged resources
observed via a handheld GPS device.
Page 92 of 99
10 Pelican St. E.
Submerged Resource Survey
April 2025
3
3 METHODOLOGY
THA biologists intentionally designed the methodology of the SRS to cover not only the entire
subject property shoreline for the proposed dock but also the area within 200 ft. of the proposed
site as required by the Collier County LDC. The components utilized for this survey included:
• Reviewing aerial photography of the surveyed area.
• Establishing survey transect lines (spaced approximately 10 feet apart) overlaid onto
aerials. (See attached Exhibits)
• Physically swimming the transects, GPS locating the limits of any submerged resources
found, and determining the percent coverage within the area.
• Documenting and photographing all findings
The surveyed area was evaluated systematically by following the established transect lines
throughout the project site as shown on the attached exhibit. Neighboring properties, adjacent
docking facilities, and other landmarks provided reference markers which assisted in
maintaining correct positioning over each transect.
During this SRS, one THA staff member swam the transect lines using snorkel equipment while
a second remained on the shoreline and within a kayak taking notes and compiling findings on
an aerial of the project site. Ordinarily, if any resources are found, they are photographed, GPS
located, delineated, and analyzed for percent coverage within the area via a half meter square
quadrat.
Page 93 of 99
10 Pelican St. E.
Submerged Resource Survey
April 2025
4
4 RESULTS
The substrate found within the surveyed area consists of silty sand material and shell debris.
Depths increased gradually with distance from the shoreline but once past the existing
neighboring dock the depths dropped off significantly.
During the submerged portion of the survey, no seagrasses, oysters, or other resources were
observed in any capacity. Accordingly, no impacts to submerged resources are expected to occur
as the result of the proposed project. A list of species observed during the SRS can be seen below
in Table 1.
Table 1: Observed species of wildlife and vegetation within the vicinity of the project site
Common Name Scientific Name
Eastern mudminnow Umbra pygmaea
Sheepshead Archosargus probatocephalus
Common Snook Centropomus undecimalis
Gray Snapper Lutjanus griseus
Greenback Oncorhynchus clarkii stomias
Page 94 of 99
10 Pelican St. E.
Submerged Resource Survey
April 2025
5
5 CONCLUSION
The submerged resource survey was conducted and completed throughout a 200-foot radius
surrounding the project site and yielded few results. The two adjacent existing docking facilities
and scattered riprap provided surface area for barnacles and a few oysters to grow with
numerous fish swimming about. At the time of the survey there were no seagrasses or other
marine resources that were observed anywhere within the vicinity of the project site. Based off
these observations it is THA opinion that the proposed project will not have any negative impacts
to any submerged resources nor the subject waterway water quality.
Page 95 of 99
10 Pelican St. E.
Submerged Resource Survey
April 2025
6
6 PHOTOS
Photo 1: View to the South of the subject waterway.
Photo 2: View to the West of subject waterway and existing seawall.
Photo 3: View to the East of subject waterway.
Page 96 of 99
10 Pelican St. E.
Submerged Resource Survey
April 2025
7
Photo 4, 5 & 6: Typical sediment observed in survey area.
Page 97 of 99
1
John Kelly
From:John Kelly
Sent:Tuesday, August 12, 2025 6:32 PM
To:John Kelly
Subject:BD-PL20240013776 - 10 Pelican St E - Sign Posting 08122025
Attachments:Sign 1.jpg; Sign 2.jpg
I, John Kelly, personally posted a notice of public hearing sign to the front of the subject property, as evidenced by the
attached photos, at approximately 2:50 P.M. this date.
Respectfully,
John Kelly
Planner III
Zoning
Office:239-252-5719
2800 N Horseshoe Dr.
Naples, Florida 34104
John.Kelly@colliercountyfl.gov
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a
public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
Page 98 of 99
Page 99 of 99