HEX Final Decision #2025-23HEX NO. 2025-23
HEARING EXAMINER DECISION
DATE OF HEARING.
June 12, 2025
PETITION.
Petition No. VA-PL20240011254 - 3620 White Boulevard -Request for an after -the -fact
variance from Land Development Code (LDC) Section 2.03.O1.B.2.d, fora 75-foot wide
nonconforming lot of record in the Estate (E) Zoning District, to reduce the required eastern
side yard from 7.5 feet to 4.2 feet to allow for the continued existence of a pool equipment
shed and to allow a further reduction of said side yard to 2.95 feet to accommodate the
structure's 1.25- foot roof overhang. The subject property is located at 3620 White Boulevard
and further described as the West 150 feet of Tract 84, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 27, in
Section 14, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION.
The petitioner is requesting an after -the -fact variance from Land Development Code (LDC)
Section 2.03.O1.B.2.d, fora 75-foot wide nonconforming lot of record in the Estate (E) Zoning
District, to reduce the required eastern side yard setback from 7.5 feet to 4.2 feet to allow for the
continued existence of a pool equipment shed and to allow a further reduction of said side yard to
2.95 feet to accommodate the structure's roof overhang.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
Approval with conditions.
FINDINGS.
1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87(2) of the
Collier County Code of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter
9 of the County Administrative Code.
2. The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all
County and state requirements.
3. The public hearing was conducted electronically and in -person in accordance with
Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04.
4. The County Staff presented the Petition followed by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's
representative, public comment and then rebuttal by the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's
representative. There were no objections for this item at the public hearing.
Page 1 of 5
5. The offending shed structure is substantial and contains plumbing and electrical equipment
and would be extremely difficult if not impossible to relocate. The underlying code
enforcement case is stayed pending the outcome of this decision.
6. The County's Land Development Section 9.04.03 lists the criteria for variances. The Hearing
Examiner having the same authority as the Board of Zoning Appeals may grant, deny, or
modify any request for a variance from the regulations or restrictions of the Collier County
Land Development Code.1
1. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location,
size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved?
The recor°d evidence cmd testimony from the public hear°ing reflects that the applicant's
expert stated, "This is anon -conforming lot with a lot width of 75'. " County staff
concurred; the minimum lot width by today's standard is I50 linear• feet
2. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the
applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of
the Variance request?
The record evidence and testimony ji°or�� the public hearing reflects that the applicant's
exper°t stated, "The encroaching accessory sh°ucture, a pool equipment shed, was
constructed in 2010, prior• to the pza•chase of the subject propert�� in 2021 by the current
owner•. It has had no negative impact to the existing site. "County staff acknowledged the
shed was constructed in 2010, prior to the current ownership of the property; hola�ever,
firr•ther noted that the shed is part of a Code Case (CESD20210012586) that �-vas initiated
by cr neighbor in December of 2021.
3. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and
undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant?
The record evidence and testimony ji•om the public hearing reflects that the applicar��t's
expert stated, "Yes. It i-Hill be ver°y cliff cult to move a structure that has existed for 14 years.
The structure �-vas ah•eady builtprior to the purchase in 2021. It has had no negative impact
to the existing site. We will be applying for a building permit for• this structure as well. "
Courat)� staff agreed that the proper°ty was purchased by the current ola�ner in. 2021 cmd has
no doubt that a literal interpretation of the zoning code lvoirld cause practical difficulties
for the applicant.
4. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health,
safety, and welfare?
1 The Hearing Examiner's findings are italicized.
Page 2 of 5
The record evidence crud testimony from the pzrblic hearing �°eflects that the applicant's
expert stated, "Yes. "County staff' noted that the requested variance will accommodate
both the footprint of the encroaching st��•ucture and the related roof overhang. There is no
reason to believe that the existing st�•uctirre would impair the standards of health, safety,
or° �•>>elfare, given that it has existed for• crt least 14 years.
5. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by
these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district?
The record evidence crud testimony from the public hearing reflects that the applicant's
expert stated, "Yes. " By definition, a variance bestows some dimensional relief from the
zoning regulations specifrc to cr site. LDC Section 9.04.02 allows relief throzrgh the
variance process for any dimensional development standcn°o' As such, other properties
facing a similar hardship would be entitled to make a similar request and tia�ould be
conferred egzral consideration on a case -by -case basis.
6. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land
Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to
the public welfare?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that the applicant's
exper°t stated, "Yes. This structure has existed fog° 14 years and has hcrd no negative impact
to the site or• neighbor°ing properties. "Zoning staff concurs; however, n2zrst note that the
existing Code Ccrse does not reveal the reason the complainant initiated the case. The only
kno���n violation is the failure to obtain a building permit.
7. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and
objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.?
The record evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects Hurt the applicant's
expert stated, "No. "County staff noted that there appears to be a hedge along the eastern
property line and that there appears to be a driveway on the opposite side of the fence.
8. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the GMP?
The recor°d evidence and testimony from the public hearing reflects that approval of this
hcrriance ���ill not c�ect or change the r°equir°ements of the GMP concerning density,
intensity, compatibility, access/connectivity, or any other applicable provisions.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY.
The subject property is in the Residential Estates Subdistrict land use classification of the Urban
Golden Gate Estates Future Land LJse Map. This land use category is designed to accommodate
single-family residential development at a maximum density of one unit per 2.25 acres, or one unit
per legal non -conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. The petitioner seeks a Variance
for an existing storage shed that is accessory to asingle-family dwelling unit which is an authorized
Page 3 of 5
land use. The Growth Management Plan (GMP) does not address individual variance requests
related to land use.
ANALYSIS.
Based on a review of the record including the Petition, application, exhibits, the County's staff
report, and hearing comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner's
representative(s), County staff and any given by the public, the Hearing Examiner finds that there
is enough competent, substantial evidence as applied to the criteria set forth in Section 9.04.03 of
the Land Development Code to approve the Petition.
DECISION.
The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition No. VA-PL20240011254, filed by the Kira
Orangio of Phoenix Associates of Florida, on behalf of the owner William N. Kogok, Jr., with
respect to the property legally described as s located at 3620 White Boulevard, AKA: the West
150 feet of Tract 84, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 27, in Section 14, Township 49 South, Range
26 East, Collier County, Florida, for the following:
® An after -the -fact variance from Land Development Code (LDC) Section 2.03.O1.B.2.d, for
a 75-foot wide nonconforming lot of record in the Estate (E) Zoning District, to reduce the
required eastern side yard. setback from 7.5 feet to 4.2 feet to allow for the continued
existence of a pool equipment shed and to allow a further reduction of said side yard to
2.95 feet to accommodate the structure's roof overhang.
Said changes are fully described in the Site Plan attached as Exhibit "A" and the Survey Sketch Of
Boundary Survey attached as Exhibit "B", and are subject to the conditions) set forth below.
ATTACHMENTS.
Exhibit A —Site Plan
Exhibit B —Survey Sketch Of Boundary Survey
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
The subject property is located at 3620 White Boulevard, AKA: the West 150 feet of Tract 84,
Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 27, in Section 14, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier
County, Florida.
CONDITIONS.
1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the
development.
2. The equipment in the structure needs to be well maintained.
3. The structure itself needs to be well kept and well maintained to mitigate noise from the
equipment.
Page 4 of 5
DISCLAIMER.
Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any
way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency
and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant
fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or
undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.
APPEALS.
This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done
in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES
AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR
VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE
NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
July 10, 2025
Date
��-
�
Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP
Hearing Examiner
Page 5 of 5
9 rib � ��t$� .�..om... s m...,� a J�Z W� �Z
_,�,���ms $���� ���`�;��'�"�"� W _ who of og r
e o a vi o n �� a e roos�riwuv-s,•���ewxs krsr-sa; (ccx> w I ilia-vzs (ux) xa t H J U d- �-
A .- ie��� rain scm»'s3mrd sax nti<s Aron xoucn�.v�mice - =W� -�v N�
��j+T'•, �„��a t/a12101� oiw ��; o _ w� _�
y � i �' @ � do eaivraoa®v � m J "�+; � � - f1 Q
�.!'��,�' ���� d X I N 3 0 H d �Z� z's a aa��a®® p o �
e:
e
e
O
lP1E�
F
4
F"`..
�.
�
�
pp66
p
�
�
a is
�4e
��
a
'
9
:
:
e
�
<
�r{C
g
E �
p
�� 2i
i� �6�i
`''
S
�
"
a
�
� !E
f��
$ ��
i F
O
� d
N
a
€
¢
��
W
� g� g� � �
Z
y..,
y
�
�
?qo
"'
���Y
E
�g�gV
ZaK
g�
'y 9
f E 7 Q
S?�
y�
r�
i
p����a
€
g
9t
O
S� �
y$
i
`m
3
(u
.�
a
N
(V
N
O
♦--
Vl
F
Z
9
4
a
2
O
—
U
-
N
z
�'
E
tt1
\ R
z
�
O
U
�
- _
((
J
��
��
p
h
p
!
W
N
Z
W
---
.E911
a
�
W
�
�u�
a
J
ti�_i �_
Ofi
O
�
�'S%
a
Uh' tlUUNUAKY b'UXV�'Y
NOT FOR FENCf CONSTRUCTION
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOT FOR DESIGN
COPYRIGHT 2021: F.LA. SURVEYS CORP.
THE LINES ON 7HIS SKETCH DO NOT COtJSTITUTE ORNERSHIP.
PAGF, i OF 3
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR PAGE 3 OF S
STREET ADDRESS
3s2o v�TITE pl.w
NAPLES, FL
LEGAL DESCRIP'PION
THE EAST 75 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET
OF TRACT 84. GOLDEN GATE ESTATES. UNIT
N0. 27 A SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE
PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED TN PLAT
BOOK 7, PAGE 17 AND 18 OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA.
CERTIFIED TO
YflLLIAM KOGOK, JR o 0
a 5.82'02'42"E. 409.42' (G)
FIR05/DH" � � 5.82'02'07'E.,409.29' (M)
OPRM LOCATION /� WHITE BLVD.
,� / (60' ROW)
�^
3
OISTMIL
FROH HL
rQ car
FIR
NO
N.89'38'S9�W. 73.77' (M)
N.89'31'41"E. 75.00'
S.89'40'50'E. 75.Q0�
MY <b�
2685Dg.t1, �' tPT
DA,E, Zb�b8y.1
bD.AB'S6.V''vl
ti Aa, .25�
S bs'6`.36
/ CENTERLINE
FlR 5/8'
NO ID 11TH AVE SW
(60' ROW)
HOUSE/FENCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE
LOT UNE
DISTANCE FRON
FENCE iQ LOT LINE
CFENLE IS INSIDE
,.-THE PRQPERTY AT
ALL LQCATfQ,VS
' FlR 5/8' I
NO ID 15i
� �
V
U N
Q I
I
sEE
9.0 9
W 75' OF
TRACT 84 �
ex
CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTJFY THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER A1Y
RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL
SURVEYORS &MAPPERS CHAPTER SJ17.05-052, FLORIDA
ADMINSTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 FLORIDA
STATUTES.
�
C�
��
ooH
�w�
�
�
�
I.i?�
0
0,
r
a'
�o
T
N
o
�
ooz
Z
Z
FlR
ND
i
1b•
I
Leland Digitally signed by
t� Leland DySard, P.LS
DySard, F.LS D3:3626?050'000
CROWN OF ROAD
ELEVATION =
11.2' NAw
fit' ALUMINUM FFNCE
P1GHT OF WAV 1
FlR 5/8'
NO ID
`\� N.89'44'40'E. 74.88' (M)
N.89'31'41"E. 75.00' (G)
5.89'40'S0'E. 75.00' (P)
FlR 5/8"
¢8357
0.3' E
DENT
S
�
a
o
p
o'er
n
�
�
f
I.i
3
omo
'-
E 180' OF
Sv
�
�
TRACT 84
O
O
�
N
VI
I 4' CIF i.q'
1 I
3Bt.6 I FlR 5/8'
I I ®8357
1 I
I I
IE 75'OF I
Iw tso' of
TRACT 84 I
I a�sF
FIR 5/8'
IJO ID
5.89'30'S5"W. 74.83' (M)
S.89'31'41"V1. 75.00' (G)
N.89'40'50"W. 75.00' (P)
TRACT 85
TYE
SCALE: 1" = 100'
DETAIL NOT TO SCALE
ENTRY
ONE STDRY
RESIDENCE
FEE
15.0' NAw
SCREERED
IN PDOL
FFE _
11.0' NAw
f \ 20.2
u GAFAGE
RO.R
OVER -HANG
NAw
FFE _
PDDL e,,• 12.5; NAw
EOUIP. � /
SHED N �
C
VIA
CaJC ��
FFE/= FFE _
13.3' tJAw 11.1• NAw
MEASURED BEARINGS SHOYM ARE BASED ON
STATE PLANE COORDIIJATES (FLORIDA EAST
ZONE), YMICH IS GRID NORTH AS
ESTABLISHED BY NOS, AS ACQUIRED BY
USING GPS TECHNOLOGY AND IS THE "BASIS
OF BEARINGS". MEASUREMENTS LABELED AS
(G) ARE THE CALCULATED GPS PLAT
BEARINGS.
0 100 200
02/O1/2022
BY : ____ � __ SURVEY DATE : _________
CL[NTON 1P. FINSTAD, CFAI, PIS �2453 RONALD W. 1YALLING PSN #8473
LELAND F. DySARD, PIS �(3859 MARY E. FINSTAD, CFAl, PSM #5901 QUALITY CONTROL
NOT VALID VATHOUT SURVEYOR'S SIGNATURE AND EMBOSSED SEAL pY : __ MEF____________ PATE : _02/03/2022
NOT A CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, EASEMENTS OR FREEDOM OF ENCUMBRANCES.
FLORIDA STANTE SJ-17.05 (3) (c): TVJO SITE BENCHMARKS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOTE: PROPERTY O{WER SHOULD OBTAIN PiJ21T7EN FLODD ZONE DETERA✓INA7IDN FROJ.I LOCAL FERAf/771NG, NOTE IF APPLICABLE, FENCES SHOVM MEANDER
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTb1ENT PR10R TO ANY CDN57RUCTION PLANNING AND/GR CONSTRUCTJON. ON OR OFF LINES. (APPROX. lOCA7JON ONLY)
388h PROGRESS AVE., SUIIE 104 NOTE:
NAPLES, FL 34104 IN COlAPLJANCE \NTH F.A.C. SJ-17.052 REVISIONS
F.I,.F1. SURVEYS CORP. 239-403-1600 FAX 403-8600 (2) (d) (4) (IF LOCATION OF EASEMENTS GARAGE
239-404-7129 239-580-2795 OR RIGHT-OF-WAY OF RECORD. OTHER 10/03/2023
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS &MAPPERS —LB 6569 239-250-2792 'THAN THOSE ON RECORD PLAT. IS
REQUIRED, THIS INFORMATION MUST DE PROJECT N0:
9220 BONITA BEACH ROAD, STE 200 FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR AND
nnniunl ❑v. coil DnoTv I`u�cC• nn Rl1NITA CPRINl:C FI id135 MAPPER. 77-1(1(T1F—CP('
PAGE 2 OF 3
NOT FOR FENCE CONSTRUCTION
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOT FOR DESfGN
PHOTO PAGE
�:.��. . � r't:
�j� 7�•
F.L.A. SURVEYS CORP.
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS &MAPPERS - LB 6569
DRAWN BY: LFD PARTY CHIEF:
•� V
a' . ��►+
3884 PROGRFSS AVE., SUITE 104
NAPLES, FLOR[DA 34104
239-003-1600 FAX 403-8600
9220130NITA BEACH ROAD, STE. 200
BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34I35
239-003-1600 FAX 403-8600
REVISIONS
PROJECT NO.
22-10016
PAGE 3 OF 3
75. PBIDDE =PELICAN BAY I\IPROPEDCENT
DISTRICT DRAINAGE EASEDIENT
NOT VALID WITHOUT PAGE51
76, PC =POINT OF CURVATURE
AND 2 OF 3
77. PCC POLYT OF CODIPOGA'D CURVATURE
GENERAL NOTES
78. PCP =PERMANENT CONTROL POINT
ABSTRACT NOT REVIER'ED
79. PG =PAGE
80. PI = POINT OF INTERSECTION
Bl. PK = PARKER K.4LON NAII.
N =NORTH
82. PLS =PROFESSIONAL LAND SURI'E]'OR
5 =SOUTH
83. POB =POINT OF BEGINNING
E =EAST
84. POC = POINT OF CODIDiENCEDIENT
ll' = REST, OR ANY CODIBLYATIONTHEREOF
gg, pp = pOR'ER POLE
1. `=DEGREES
86. PRC =POINT OF REPF,RSE CURVE
2. ` _MINUTES ll'HEN USED IN A BEARING
S7. PR\I =PER\IANENT REFERENCE
3. "=SECONDS R"HEN USED LY A BEARING
DIONUDIENT
4. ` =FEET ll'I�N USED IN A DISTANCE
gg, pSDI=PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
"=INCHES R'HEN USED IN A DISTANCE
S9. P.0 & D.E =PUBLIC UTILITY 18 DRAINAGE
6. ± _ "\TORE OR LESS" OR "PLUS OR DIINUS"
EASE\[ENT
7. A =ARC DISTANCE
90, PUE =PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
8. AC =ACRES
91. PT = POINT OF TANGENCY
9. A/C =AIR CONDTTIONING P.AD
92. Pl'S =PAPERS
10. A.E =ACCESS EASEDIENT
93. Q.ICP.E. =QUAIL ]VEST PERPETUAL EASEMENT
10 A. ADJ=ADJUSTED
94, (R) = RADLAL
11. AF = ALUMINUDI FENCE
95. R = R9DIUS
12. ADIUE =AVE \[ARIA UTILITY EASE\PENT
96. RLYG = ITEDI DETECTED BY DIETAL DETECTOR BUT
L'A. APPROY. = APPRO.l'L\IATE
NOT RECOVERED
12B. AVE =AVENUE
97. RNG= RANGE
13. B.E. =BUFFER EASEMENT
98. ROR' = RIGHT•OF-WA]'
14. BDI = BENCHDLARK
99. RR SPK =RAILROAD SPIKE
15. BOB =BASIS OF BEARING
100. SAT= SATELLITE DISH
16. BRG =BEARING
101. S.D.E = STREET DRALYAGE EASE\CENT
1T. C# = CURI'E NUDIBER
102. SEC =SECTION
18. C =CALCULATED
103. SDH =SET DRILL HOLE, NO ID
19. CB =CATCH BASIN
104. SIR =SET 5/S" IRON ROD ]PITH LB
20. CHB =CHORD BEARING
NUDIBER OF CORPOR�ITION
21. CHD =CHORD
105. SPKRD = SET PK ]PITH DISC R'ITH LB NUDIBER
22. CLF = CHAINLINK FENCE
106. TBDt TEA[PORARY BENCH \LARK
23. CDI = CONCRETE DIONUDIENT
107. TEL =TELEPHONE FACILTTIES
24. CO =CLEAN OUT
108. TOB = TOP OF BANK
25. COL = COLUDIN
109. TP =TRANSMITTER PAD
26. CONC =CONCRETE
110. T]VP= TOII'NSHIP
27. CPP = CONCRETE POA'ER POLE
111. U.E UTTLTTY EASEDIENT
28. CSIP =CONCRETE SIDEWALF
=
112, \'F = l'INYL FENCE
29. CTV= CABLE TV Risen
113. \'LV =VALVE
30. C.U.E=COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY
114. R' = IVATER SERVICE
EASEDIENT
115.1VIT = R'ITNESS
31. D =DEED
115. ll'B = IVATER BOS
32. D.E=DRAINAGE EASEMENT
116. ll'F=WOOD FENCE
33. DH =DRILL HOLE
117. IVPP=1Y00D POWER POLE
34. DI = DROP INZET
118. = DELTA OR CENTRAL ANGLE OF CURPE
35. ELEC=ELECTRIC
119, DIDIENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND IN
36. EOP = EDGE OF PAl'EDIENT
DECL\LII,S THEREOF
37. FOR =EDGE OF ROAD
120. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE N.A.V.D. UNLESS
38. HOW = EDGE OF ll'ATER
OTHERRZSE STATED
39. F= AS LABELED OR FOUND IN THE FIELD
121. ALL PHYSICAL L\IPRO]'E�IENTS SHO]PN WITHOUT
40. F.A.C. = FLORIDA ADDHNISTRATI]'EOODE
DIDiENSIONS ARE FOR INFORDL]TIONAL PURPOSES
41. FCC =POUND CROSS CUT
ONL]'. THAT THEY DO E1LST, BUT IIBRE NOT
42. PCDI =POUND CONCRETE DIONU\PENT
N'ECESSARH.Y D[EASURF.D IN THE FIELD.
43. FEDIA = FEDERAL EDIERGENC]'
122. NOTE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS PROM LATEST DEED
DIANAGE\TENT AGENCY
OF RECORD UNLESS OTHERR'ISE NOTED.
44. FDH =FOUND DRILL HOLE
123. EASEDIENTS AND RIGHT OF WAYS SHOWN ARE PER
45. FFE = FLYISH FLOOR ELEVATLON
RECORDED PLAT OR AS FURNISHED BY THE CLIENT
46. FH =FIRE HYDRANT
124. FOUNDATION LINE BELOR' THE SURFACE OF THE
47. FIP = FOUNll IRON PIPE
GROUND IS NOT REFLECTED
48. FIR =FOUND IRO\ ROD
125. THIS SURPEY IS NOT TO BE USED FOR
49. FN =FOUND NAIL
CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES UNDER AN]'
50. FND =FOUND
CONDITION UNLESS OTHERR'ISE STATED
51. FNSD =FOUND NAIL K DISC
126. NO UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR
52. FPR =FOUND PK NAIL
IDIPROI'EDIENTS HA]'E BEEN LOCATED ESCEPT
53. FPKRD = FOUN'D PK NAH. AND DISC
AS NOTED
53. G =GEODETIC
127. NO INSTRU\TENTS OP RECORD REFLECTING
S4.GPS =GLOBAL POSITIONING SY STEM
EASEDIENTS, RIGHT OF 1V'.�1YS, ANDlOR 011'IVERSHIP
54. GCE =GOLF COURSE EASEDIENT
]]'ERE FURNISHED THIS SURI'El'OR El'CEPT AS
55. HCP =HANDICAP PARKING
SHOR-N
56. IE =IRRIGATION EASEMENTC
128. THERE ARE NO VISIBLE ENCROACR\fENTS E%CEPT
57.ILLEG =ILLEGIBLE
THOSE AS DELINEATED ON'CHIS PLAT OF SURPEY 129.
51. LB = LICENSED BLiSLYESS
TIES ARE TO FIELD LINES UNLESS OTHERR'ISE NOTED
58. LBE =LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEDIENT
130. THERE DIAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS AND/0R
59. LE =LANDSCAPE EASE\LENT
EASEDIENTS THAT ARE NOT RECORDED ON SAID
60. L.DLE =LAKE DL�.LYTENANCE EASEMENT
PLAT THAT DIAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC
61. LP =LIGHT POLE
RECORDS OF THIS COUNT]'
62. M = DIEASURED
131. FENCES MEANDER ON AND OFF LINE, APPROl'IDIATE
63. DIE = DIAINTENANCE EASEDIENT
LOCATION ONLY UNLESS STATED OTHERR7SE. 132. TILE
64. MH = DIANHOLF.
LINES ON THIS SKETCH DO NOT CONSTTTUTE
65. N.A.]{D. = NORTH ADIERICAN PERTICAL
OR'NERSIHP
DATCiM
133. THE LYTENT OF TCHS SURPEY IS FOR TITLE
65.A NAl'D = NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL
TRANSFER ONLY UNLESS STATED 01'HERlPISE 134.
DATUDC
FLORIDA STATUTE 61G17-6.004: Tll'O SITE BENCHDLARKS
66. N.G.\SD. =NATIONAL GEODETIC PERTICAL
ARE REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION. 135. THIS SURPEY
DATUDI
DOES NOT REFLECT OR DETER\LINE ORNERSHIP.
67. NO ID = NO IDENTIFYLYG DIARKINGS
121. RE.DI.A. FLOOD ILIZARD DAPPING: TINS DATE
68. (NR) = NON•RADL4L
PRODUCT R'AS NOT llESIGNED TO DCAKE PRECISE
69. NT5= NOT TO SCALE
IN/OUT FLOOD RISK DETER\IWATIONS. THIS
70.OHP= OVERHEAD POWER
PRODUCT IS NOT SLZTABLE FOR
71.OHU =OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS ANZ CANNOT
72.O.R. =OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
BE USED TO
73. O/S =OFFSET
DETERDILYE ABSOLUTE DELINEATIONS OF FLOOD
74. P =PLAT
BOUNDARIES. CALL 1.877•FE1L4\TAP OR EilIAIL A
�fAP SPECL4LIST AT 1VtVR'.FEJLI.ORG/JHT/1'SDlFO
AIAPI7.HT\I.
137. PROPERTY OR�NER SHOULD OBT.�fLY R'RITTEN
FLOOD ZONE DETER\tINATION FRODI LOCAI.
PERMITTLYG, PLANNING AND BCIILDLYG
DEPARTDIENT PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCIION
PL,�YNLYG AND/OR CONSTRUCTION
138.IN CO\IPLL�.NCE tt'ITH F.A.C. 61G17-6.0031 (4) (E) - L?
LOCATION OF EASE\TENTS OR RIGAT-OF-tVAY OF
RECORD, OTHER THAN THOSE ON RECORD PLAT,iS
REQUIRED, THIS INTOR\IATION bIL1ST BE
FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR AND \[APPER.
139. IF APPLICABLE, FENCES SHORN MEANDER ON OR
OFF LINES (APPROl'I\I-ATE LOCATION ONLY) 140.
ARCHI1'EC1'URaL FEATURES, SUCH A5 FURRING
STRIPS, SIDLYG, CORNICES, STUCCO, ETC., OUTSIDE
THE LINE OF THE STRUCTURE IL4VE BEEN T-4KEN
INTO ACCOUNT R'HEN GIVING TIE5 FROM THE
STRUCTURE TO THE LOT LINES.
141. ATTENTION LS DIRECTED TO THE FACT THAT THIS
SURVEY \LAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED OR ENLARGED IN
SIZE DUE TO REPRODUCTIO\. THLS SHOULD BE
TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION RHEN OBTAINING
SCALED DATA.