The URL can be used to link to this page

Backup Documents 06/10/2025 Item #16J 2 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 1 6 J 2 TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the County Attorney Office at the time the item is placed on the agenda. All completed routing slips and original documents must be received in the County Attorney Office no later than Monday preceding the Board meeting. ** ROUTING SLIP** Complete routing lines#1 through#2 as appropriate for additional signatures,dates,and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exception of the Chairman's signature,draw a line through routing lines#1 through#2,complete the checklist,and forward to the County Attorney Office. Route to Addressee(s) (List in routing order) Office Initials Date 2. 911/Communications Tech Division Sheriff's Office BFIII 6/10/2025 3. County Attorney Office County Attorney Office 5Ak/, 0/2,5 4. BCC Office Board of County Commissioners 1554//4 //i/zs 5. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office 1( Vicroce PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the Executive Summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above may need to contact staff for additional or missing information. Name of Primary Staff Bob Finney,Collier County Sheriff's Office Phone Number 239-252-3366 Contact/Department 239 253-4989 Agenda Date Item was 06/10/2025 Agenda Item Number 16.J.2 Approved by the BCC Type of Document(s) Grant agreement signature and MOU Number of Original 2 (73 pages) Attached Documents Attached PO number or account N/A number if document is to be recorded INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark"N/A"in the Not Applicable column,whichever is Yes N/A(Not appropriate. (Initial) Applicable) 1. Does the document require the chairman's signature?(stamped unless otherwise stated) BFIII 2. Does the document need to be sent to another agency for additional signatures? If yes, N/A provide the Contact Information(Name;Agency;Address;Phone)on an attached sheet. 3. Original document has been signed/initialed for legality. (All documents to be signed by BFIII the Chairman,with the exception of most letters,must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney.) 4. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney N/A Office and all other parties except the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board. 5. The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the BFIII document or the final negotiated contract date whichever is applicable. 6. "Sign here"tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's BFIII •gnature and initials are required. 7. In most cases(some contracts are an exception),the original document and this routing slip BFIII should be provided to the County Attorney Office at the time the item is uploaded to the agenda. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines! 8. The document was approved by the BCC on 6/10/2025 and all changes made during BFIII N/A is not the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney an option for Office has reviewed the changes,if applicable. this line. 9. Initials of attorney verifying that the attached document is the version approved by the N/A is not BCC,all changes directed by the BCC have been made,and the document is ready for the /�i 4 an option for Chairman's signature. 'v�`/ this line. I:Forms/County Forms/BCC Forms/Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04;Revised 1.26.05;2.24.05; 11/30/12;4/22/16;9/10/21 16J 2 AGENDA TRANSMITTAL SLIP Agenda Item Date Submitted : 05/27/2025 Requested - Agenda Date:06/10/2025 APPROPRIATE HEADING(CIRCLE ONE) ❑(2) Pledge of Allegiance ❑ (3)Approval of Agenda and Minutes 0 (4) Proclamations ❑(5) Presentations 0(6) Public Petitions ❑ (7) Board of Zoning Appeals ❑(8) Advertised Public Hearings ❑(9) Board of County Commissioners 0 (10) County Manager's Report ❑ (11) Public Comments on General 0(12) County Attorney's Report ❑ (13)Other Constitutional Officers Topics 0(14)Airport Authority 0(15) Staff and Commissioner General X (16)Consent Agenda Communications ❑(17) Summary •enda Review b Date:thefr Requested b f 1,' Date: /?7P3 Lori Sams. •cting Finance i ctor CCSO Legal ---� ��y Date: Division Head: Da . %`o—• unty Manager: , Sheriff Item Title: Approve request to accept and sign the FY2025 grant application under the E911 State Grant Program. List of Documents Attached: 1. Executive Summary(required) 2. Draft grant application 3. MOU addendum 16J 2 ITEM NO: DATE RECEIVED: FILE NO. : ROUTED TO: DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS SPACE REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES F:eaee type .'r ;r: r. Date: May 27, 2025 To: Office of the County Attorney Attention: Tammy Althouse From: Stephanie Driscoll Finance Director (Name) (Title) Sheriff ' s Office Finance Division Division! (Department) Re: Grant submittal - Florida E911 State Grant Program (Subject) BACKGROUND OF REQUEST/PROBLEM: (Describe problem and give background information - be specific, concise, and articulate) . Sheriff Kevin Rambosk is seeking approval from the Board of County Commissioners for the submittal of the Florida E911 State grant and MOU addendum, which would provide for the 911 System Upgrade (CPE Upgrade and i3 Interoperability) . (Are there documents or other information needed to review this matter? If yes, attach and reference this information) . Yes - last year's delegation letter. THIS ITEM HAS/HAS NOT BEEN PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. (If previously submitted, provide County Attorney's Office file number.) ACTION REQUESTED: (Be very specific. Identify exactly what you need in the way of legal services.) Legal review to place this item on the Board' s June 10 , 2025 . OTHER COMMENTS: CC: Kevin Rambosk, Sheriff All requests must be copied to your appropriate Division Head or Constitutional Officer.) ;h/1egalscaap2C09 16J 2 911 Grant Programs Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin. Code R. 6OFF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 1 1 6J 2 1. Purpose 3 2. Eligibility 3 3. Definitions 3 4. 911 Grant Programs Calendar 5 5. General Conditions 6 6. Guidelines for 911 Grant Expenses 9 7. Approval and Award 10 8. Financial and Administrative Requirements 11 9. Grant Reporting Procedures 12 10. Change Requests 13 Application 15 Appendix I: Florida 911 Regional Map 21 Addendum I: Funding Priorities 22 Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs,revised January 2025 W Form 3A,incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin.Code R.6OFF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 2 16J 2 1. Purpose Each county, group of counties or region applying for 911 State Grant, to assist counties with the replacement or upgrade of 911 Systems; for counties to develop and maintain statewide 911 routing using Emergency Services Internet Protocol (IP) networks (ESlnet), Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and services, and Management Information Systems (MIS); and develop and maintain Next Generation 911 (NG911) systems and services. The State 911 Grant Programs distributes funds collected pursuant to section 365.172-173, Florida Statutes. 2. Eligibility Any county in the State of Florida is eligible to apply for these grant programs. 3. Definitions 3.1. Alternate Contract Source (ACS) — A competitively procured contract led by a federal, state, or local government. The ACS contract is cost-effective, contains language contemplating its use for cooperative purchasing, and the best interest of the county to use for purchases, provided the county's purchase is not over expansive in size and scope. 3.2. 911 System: The Public Safety Answering Point equipment, in accordance with the State 911 Plan, including 911 call routing, processing, mapping, and call answering communications equipment. 3.3. Cybersecurity: Cybersecurity is the practice of safeguarding digital assets from unauthorized access or criminal use. The aim is to prevent, detect, and respond to cyberattacks. State Grant funds may be used to assess cyber vulnerabilities in PSAPs, implement protective hardware and software, and maintain these security measures. 3.4. Enhanced 911 (E911): An enhanced 911 system or enhanced 911 service that is an emergency telephone system or service that provides a subscriber with 911 service and also directs 911 calls to appropriate public safety answering points by selective routing based on the geographical location from which the call originated, or as otherwise provided in the state plan under section 365.171, Florida Statutes, and that provides for automatic number identification and automatic location-identification features 3.5. GIS Maintenance: Ongoing GIS maintenance of a county's GIS data that consists of road centerline, site/structure address points, primary PSAP boundaries, MSAG and ALI maintenance services and address assignment services. Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin.Code R.60FF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 3 6J 2 3.6. Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB): The independent organization that establishes and improves standards of accounting and financial reporting for U.S. state and local governments. 3.7. Grantee: The county, group of counties, or region awarded a grant. 3.8. Hosted Services: Technology services using the vendor's off premises remote servers for a fee. 3.9. Maintenance Contract: a business agreement between a contractor and customer covering the maintenance of equipment over a specified period. 3.10. Memorandum of Understanding: A signed agreement between a group of counties outlined in a formal document. It signals the willingness of the parties to move forward together. The MOU can be seen as the starting point, as it defines the scope and purpose. 3.11. Next Generation 911 (NG911): The designation for an advanced 911 emergency communications system or service that provides a communications service subscriber with 911 service. NG911 also directs 911 emergency requests for assistance to appropriate public safety answering points based on the geographical location from which the call/signal originated, or as otherwise provided in the State 911 Plan and that provides for automatic number identification and automatic location identification features and emergency data information through managed IP-based networks. 3.12. Next Generation 911 Core Services (NGCS): The base set of services needed to process a 911 call/signal on an ESlnet. Includes the Emergency Service Routing Proxy (ESRP), Emergency Call Routing Function (ECRF), Location Validation Function (LVF), Border Control Function (BCF), Bridge, Policy Store, Logging services, and typical IP services such as Domain Name System (DNS) and Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP). The term NG911 Core Services encompasses the services but does not include the network on which they operate. 3.13. NG911 Equipment Hardware equipment and peripherals needed to implement and maintain NG911 services. 3.14. Public Safety Answering Point(PSAP): The public safety agency that receives incoming 911 requests for assistance and dispatches appropriate public safety agencies to respond to the requests in accordance with the State 911 plan. 3.15. Region: Refers to counties grouped by the Florida 911 Regional Map. 3.16. Regional Next Generation 911 project: A project in support of the NG911 interoperability with at least two-thirds of the counties in a region with the intention of achieving a NG911 statewide call routing capability in accordance Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin. Code R.60FF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 4 16J 2 with Section 365.177, F.S._Regional projects in support of the Board strategic initiatives may be considered for 5-year grant award. 3.17. Service contract: A written contract to perform, over a fixed period or for a specific duration, duties relating to informal and technical services. 3.18. Warranty Contract: A written guarantee given to the purchaser of a new item by the manufacturer or dealer, usually specifying that the manufacturer will make any repairs or replace defective parts free of charge for a stated period. 4. 911 Grant Programs Calendar The Emergency Communications Board (Board) will accept applications as noticed in the Florida Administrative Register. Action Eligible entity submits Submission date(s) as application published in the Florida Administrative Register Board members evaluate Within 45 days of the applications application closing date Board votes on applications to Within 60 days of the fund at regularly scheduled meeting application closing date Board sends notification of Within 90 days of the awards approved or denied for application closing date funding to the counties Performance Period County, group of counties or Two years from receipt of regional implementation/ award notification installation period -Two Year Award Regional NG911 Project— up If at least 2/3 of the counties in to a Five Year Award a region participate, maximum of up to five years Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin. Code R.6OFF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 5 16J 2 County grant conversion to a Up to three years from the regional project (5-yr grant) original grant expiration date Initial database synchronization Two years from receipt of (such as ALI, MSAG, and award notification Centerline) Approved only with Regional Database maintenance (such Projects as ALI, MSAG, Centerline....) A county hosted services grant Up to five years from receipt application of award notification 5. General Conditions Applications must be delivered to the following address: electronically to the DMS Grant Portal at https.//publicsatety.ti.govistart/#/login Alternatively, grant application can be submitted at ECBSubmissions@dms.fl.gov Electronic receipt of the grant application and all attachments is preferred. 5.1. The applicant shall provide Application Form items 1 through 14 and the applicable procurement documents. The grant application package must be received on or before the submission date specified in the Board notification of an 911 Grant Programs published in the Florida Administrative Register. Failure to timely provide these documents will result in a rejection of the grant application. 5.2. Pursuant to sections 365.172(6), 365.172(10), and 365.173(2) Florida Statutes, grant funds must only be used for the following items/services: to upgrade or replace 911 systems; to develop and maintain statewide or regional 911 routing; geographic information and management information systems (GIS and MIS); to develop and maintain Next-Generation 911 (NG911) services and equipment, and remotely provided hosted 911 answering point call-taking equipment and network services directly attributable to establishing and provisioning 911 or NG911 services. Warranty costs shall be calculated to account for only the first-year warranty. 5.3. GIS grant funding will be limited once the county, group or region has achieved the minimum 98% accuracy rate as identified in the NENA GIS Data Model. 5.4. Although a Next Generation 911 Regional Project can be awarded for up to five years, the cost shall be accounted for on a yearly basis. Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin. Code R.6OFF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 6 16J 2 5.5. To be eligible for Next Generation 911 (NG911) grant funding, all applicants must require all vendors involved in the NG911 project to certify in writing that their systems are interoperable and capable at the time of implementation with those of neighboring counties, regions, and adjacent states, where applicable, and that their systems comply with current NENA NG911 standards. This certification shall be submitted as part of the application package. 5.6. Only the percentage of service and equipment directly attributable to provisioning of 911 services is eligible. 5.7. All maintenance requests, within a single priority, for eligible services and equipment shall be combined into a single application, including the breakdown of line-item costs. See funding limitations in sections 6.2.1 5.8. All grant applications shall be accompanied by at least one complete quote for equipment or services. 5.8.1. Grant applications totaling $35,000.00 or more must be accompanied by at least two written substantiated quotes from different vendors. Complete quote submittals shall include a detailed scope of work, all pages included in the vendor proposal, breakdown of all costs, including equipment, service tasks, and deliverables. Any county that has made a good faith effort to obtain at least two quotes in accordance with the competitive procurement process in 287.057(1), Florida Statutes, and has not been able to obtain the quotes can request Board review based on substantiated proof of posting of the request with documentation of the limited responses subject to the following exceptions: a) When purchasing from a DMS State Term Contract or DMS authorized Alternate Contract Source, the county shall follow the DMS State Purchasing ordering instructions and their county procurement rules and policies. Counties shall provide vendor contract number with the grant application. Should the DMS State Purchasing ordering instructions and their county procurement rules and policies conflict, the county procurement rules and policies shall prevail. b) When purchasing from an Alternate Contract Source that has not been approved by DMS State Purchasing, the county shall follow their county procurement rules and policies, with provision of a letter from the county's purchasing department stating that purchase meets the county's purchasing requirement. c) Services or commodities provided by governmental entities do not require more than one quote. d) The county, group of counties, or region can initiate a request for approval to procure from a single-source vendor. These will be Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin. Code R.60FF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 7 16J 2 considered on a case-by-case basis. Justification for single-source procurement shall be provided with the application. The single- source procurement will be considered if provided in accordance with chapter 287, Florida Statutes. A letter or appropriate documentation from the applicable county's purchasing department(s) that the project is a single-source procurement based on section 287.057(3)(c), Florida Statutes, shall be provided with this grant application. e) When a county piggybacks on another governmental agency competitive purchasing process, no additional quotes are required. 5.9. Applicants requesting items from different funding priorities should complete a separate Budget Report (Rule 6OFF1-5.0035(1), F.A.C) for each priority. See Addendum 2 - Funding Priorities for the 911 Grant Programs, for a listing of funding priorities. Items from the same funding priorities should be combined in the same Budget Report and shall comply with General Conditions, item 5.9. 5.10. An individual county application must include: 5.10.1. A detailed description of line item and cost. This would include the item, model, or version. Additional information requests shall be made for more clarification, as needed. 5.10.2. If possible, software service/maintenance dates. 5.10.3. Budget Report. 5.10.4. Most current Form 6A in Rule 6OFF1-5.006(2), F.A.0 The form can be submitted during the annual collection of county fiscal data for the annual report or with the grant application. 5.11. Should a region or a group of counties apply for a grant, the following additional information needs to be provided: 5.11.1. A summary of the costs for the entire region or group of counties detailing the following: a) Total amount of funds being requested. b) The scope of work (SOW) that clearly establishes the tasks and deliverables being performed for the successful completion of the project. All deliverables must be directly related to the SOW and include information on how the region will be interoperable. c) Single source documentation if applicable. d) All individual county application(s), see requirements in 5.11. 5.12. A memorandum of understanding (MOU) or an inter-local agreement from all counties involved must be completed within 3 months of Board award. The Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin.Code R.60FF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 8 16J 2 timeline will begin after the last county in the region grant application for the regional project is approved by the Board. 5.13. Funding application requests must include a scope of work that establishes the tasks and deliverables to be performed. The applications shall include all tasks that are required for the successful completion of the project. The project shall be divided into quantifiable units of deliverables that shall be received and accepted in writing by the county, group of counties, or region before payment. Each deliverable must be directly related to the scope of work and must specify the required minimum level of service to be performed and the criteria for evaluating the successful completion of each deliverable. 5.14. Funding application requests must include all necessary costs required for full implementation of the proposed solution including that of any third party. Should the county, group of counties or region grant application request or grant award be less than the projected cost of the equipment or service, the county, group of counties or region should provide verification of the ability to fund the difference. Pricing submitted cannot be contingent upon "yet to be" determined fees for products and services by the proposer or any other third party required for implementation. 5.15. The county shall provide information on the county's preceding year fee revenue amount and the preceding year's carryforward amount. Use Form 6A in Rule 6OFF1-5.006(2), F.A.C._ for this purpose. The form can be submitted during the annual collection of county fiscal data for the annual report or with the grant application. 5.16. A state grant award may be limited by the carry forward balance. 5.17. Detailed information is required for any grant application requesting funding for systems that require immediate system replacement for provisioning of enhanced 911 in the county, group of counties, or region. Include detailed justification and explanation for any 911 system with an expected remaining life of less than one year. 5.18. Funding application requests contingent upon "beta testing" or products and services not in general production and installation will not be funded. 6. Guidelines for 911 Grant Expenses 6.1. The following expenses will not be funded through grant award: 6.1.1. Salaries and associated expenses for 911 coordinators, call takers, or other 911 personnel 6.1.2. Wireline database costs 6.1.3. Vehicle expenses Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin.Code R.6OFF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 9 16J 2 6.2. Funding limitations are specified on the following items: 6.2.1. Equipment maintenance and warranty costs will not be funded for more than the first-year implementation period. 6.2.1.1 Service contracts for Next Generation 911 Regional Projects may can be approved for up to 5 years on a case-by-case basis. Ongoing cybersecurity maintenance may be approved on an annual basis. 6.2.2. Grant funding shall be limited (per grant cycle) to eligible expenditures for one PSAP per county, either one primary or one secondary PSAP. Counties with only one PSAP with no other primary or secondary PSAPs, may be eligible for grant funding for one backup PSAP. Geo- diverse systems may be considered one PSAP for the purpose of grant funding. 6.2.3. Except for NGCS, selective router equipment costs are limited to a primary PSAP system. 6.2.4. Training cost funding is limited to the new system and equipment training. 6.2.5. The allowable grant funding for travel expenses is limited to the authorized amounts established in Section 112.061, Florida Statutes, and the Department of Financial Services Guidelines for State Expenditures. 7. Approval and Award 7.1. The Board will review each application for compliance with the requirements of terms and conditions. 7.2. DMS grant agreements shall be signed by an authorized signatory authority for the county after the grant is approved. 7.3. Grant awards will be withheld for any county, group of counties, or region that has a grant with a past-due quarterly report or past-due final documentation and closeout of previous Board grant awards. Grant awards are eligible to be withheld if the county, group of counties, or region is not in compliance with Board reporting requirements. 7.4. Applications will be awarded based upon the priorities set by the Board as listed in Addendum I - Funding Priorities for the 911 Grant Programs. 7.5. The Board will adjust the amount awarded to a county, group of counties, or region based upon the availability of funds, the reasonableness of the cost of requested items, published quotes, increased effectiveness of grant funds, minimum system requirements for performing the needed 911 function as specified in section 365.173(2)(g)1.,2., and 3., Florida Statutes, State 911 Plan, or documented factors provided in the grant application submission. NG911 network systems should include a comparative presentation of network Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin. Code R.6OFF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 10 1 6 J 2 alternatives, including applicable LEC, CLEC, County, group of counties or region, and State alternatives. All stepped pricing should be thoroughly explained, including the corresponding benefits for the county, group of counties or region, and the Board. 8. Financial and Administrative Requirements 8.1. Grant funds are provided on a cost-reimbursement basis. 8.2. Each grantee shall submit reimbursement claims to the Board as needed; however, each county is limited to only a single claim request per grant, per month. Receipt of reimbursement funds from the Board is contingent on the timely and accurate submittal of funding requests. Requests for reimbursement of expenditures must be submitted on the approved Financial Reimbursement of Expenditures Form in Rule 6OFF1-5.0035(4), F.A.C. Incomplete claim forms or claims not submitted on the correct form cannot be processed and will be returned for corrections. Submit only for the amounts in each budget category in which you have incurred expenditures. Incomplete reimbursement requests will be returned after 14 days if no updates are received from the county. 8.3. Upon written request and with documentation justifying the need, a progress disbursement shall be considered with a completed Financial Reimbursement of Expenditures Form in Rule 6OFF1-5.0035(4), F.A.C., itemized purchase order, and vendor itemized invoice. All items must comply with the Florida Department of Financial Services (DFS) Reference Guide for State Expenditures. Within 45 days of receipt of funding, the grantee shall submit verification of vendor payment. Abuse of this policy will lead to denial of future payment. 8.4. Reimbursement claims shall include only expenditures related to the specific grant and include purchase orders, itemized invoices, and proof of successful payment to the vendor. The reimbursement request must match the scope of work and budget proposed in the grant applications to include the quote provided with the application. Grants that include costs defined by a set number of work hours dedicated to a project must include additional documents as requested by DMS staff. All items must comply with the DFS Reference Guide for State Expenditures. 8.5. To assure prompt processing, complete reimbursement claims should be e-mailed to: ECBSubmissions@dms.fl.gov 8.6. Grant funds can only be expended between the beginning and end dates of the grant term, unless the Board authorizes an extension. Request for reimbursements may be submitted up to 120 days after the end of the grant term. 8.7. It is the county responsibility to maintain the property, equipment, or services in accordance with the scope of work. If a sale or transfer of such property or equipment occurs within five years after a grant ends, funds must be returned to Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin. Code R.6OFF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 11 16J 2 the Board on a pro-rata basis. If the equipment costs over $5,000, a county, group of counties, or region must maintain it on an inventory for five years unless the item becomes obsolete. 8.8. If a grantee terminates a contract for prepaid services, the unused portion must be returned to the Board on a pro-rata basis. 8.9. The grantee agrees that any improvement, expansion, or other effect brought about in whole or part by grant funds will be maintained until the system or equipment becomes obsolete (on average five years). 8.10. If a grantee materially fails to comply with any term of an award, the Board shall take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: • Withhold grant payments pending grantee correction of the deficiency. • Disapprove all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. • Suspend or terminate the current award for the grantee's project. • Suspend or deny future grant awards. 8.11. The Board will provide the grantee an opportunity for a hearing, appeal, or other administrative proceeding to which the grantee is entitled under Florida Statutes. 8.12. When a grantee wants to terminate a grant award or portion thereof, the grantee shall provide written notification to the Board, detailing the reasons for such termination, the effective date, and the release of allocated funds. The Board will then consider the request. 8.13. Proof of payment and deliverables, met in accordance with the DFS Reference Guide for State Expenditures, shall be provided by the grantee. When the information is unclear, additional documentation to confirm the information provided will be requested by Board staff. 9. Grant Reporting Procedures 9.1. Grantees will be required to submit: 9.1.1. Quarterly Status Report in Rule 6OFF1-5.0035(2), F.A.C. 9.1.2. Reporting will begin at the conclusion of the first full quarter after the award. The report periods will end on March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31 of each year. Reports are due within 30 days of the ending report period. 9.1.3. The Quarterly Status Report shall inform the Board of significant impacts on grant-supported activities and provide a summary of completed tasks/deliverables. Significant impacts include project status developments affecting time schedules and objectives, anticipated lower costs, or producing beneficial results in addition to those originally planned. Additionally, problems, delays, or adverse conditions that will Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin. Code R.6OFF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 12 16J 2 materially impair the ability to meet the timely completion of the award must be reported. The disclosure must include a statement of the action taken or contemplated and any assistance needed to resolve the situation. 9.2. Final Reporting: 9.2.1. Upon receipt of final reimbursement from DFS, a final Quarterly Status Report, in Rule 6OFF1-5.0035(2), F.A.C, shall be submitted based on the same reporting requirements described in grant reporting item 9.1. 9.2.2. Final reporting shall be submitted within 90 days of project completion. The "Final Report" box on the Quarterly Status Report, shall be marked and include your project completion date. Grants that were for equipment installation should include date of final acceptance and start of warranty period. Service grants should include the date service was started. 9.2.3. Final document submission and closeout of a grant does not affect the Board's right to disallow costs and recover funds based on an audit or financial review. The county shall remain obligated to return any funds expended that do not comply with the terms and conditions of the grant award. 9.2.4. The counties must provide DMS with a copy of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), consistent with section 218.32 Florida Statutes, no later than June 30. 9.3. All reports, associated information, and final reporting documents should be e- mailed to: ECBSubmissions(&dms.fl.gov. 10. Change Requests 10.1. Change requests shall be submitted prior to deviation from any awarded grant application. No changes or departures from the original request are authorized unless approved in writing by the Board. Such requests shall be submitted using the Change Request Form in Rule 6OFF1-5.0035(3), FA.C. 10.2. Prior to a county signing a contract with a different vendor from the original vendor stated in the grant application, the county, group of counties, or region must request a grant change on the Change Request Form in Rule 6OFF1- 5.0035(3), F.A.C, and include an itemized quote and a copy of the new contract. 10.3. Time extension requests will not be granted unless the county has executed a contract for the grant equipment and services or demonstrates good cause for Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin.Code R.6OFF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 13 16J 2 failure to execute a contract within one year of the award. Good cause documentation shall include a new project timeline schedule. 10.4. Time extensions shall be limited to a maximum of one additional year if approved by the Board. 10.5. Conversion from a two-year grant up to a five-year grant will add up to three additional years from the grant's original expiration date. 10.6. Change requests must be submitted 10 business days prior to a Board meeting to be reviewed. Late submissions will be reviewed at the next Board meeting. 10.7. The Change Request Form and associated information should be e-mailed to ECBSubmissions@dms.fl.gov. Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin. Code R.6OFF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 14 16J 2 Application County COLLIER Total Amount Requested: $ 5,032,702 Project Title: 911 CPE UPGRADE & i3 Interoperability 1. Chair, Board of County Commissioners: CHRIS HALL Mailing Address: 3299 TAMIAMIA TRAIL EAST STE. 303 City: NAPLES State: FLORIDA Zip: 34112 Phone: ( 239 ) 252-8602 Fax: Email Address: CHRIS.HALL@COLLIERCOUNTYFL.GOV 2. County, 911 Coordinator: BOB FINNEY III Mailing Address: 3319 TAMIAMI TRAIL E City: NAPLES State: FL Zip: 34112 Phone: ( 239 ) 252-9366 Fax: Email Address: BOB.FINNEY@COLLIERSHERIFF.ORG 3. Federal Tax ID Number: 59-6000561 4. County information Number of PSAPs 2 Primary, 1 Mobile Number of Call-taking Positions per PSAP CCSO —49, NPD —6, MOBILE -11 PSAP(s) in which grant funding will apply. Collier County Sheriffs Office & Naples PD Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin. Code R.60FF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 15 16J 2 Is the call handling solution associated with Yes X No this grant request Geo-diverse? Not Applicable 5. Financial Information a. What are the current annual costs for your€911 system (e.g., circuits, customer records, hardware and software, etc.) not including maintenance? $1,289,484 b. What are the current annual costs for maintenance of items included in 5a? $1,430,013 c. Total amount of fee revenue received in the preceding county fiscal year. This does not include any special disbursement, Rural County supplements or training disbursements. $2,280,304 d. Total amount of county carry-forward funding retained in the preceding county fiscal year. $218,300 e. Total-amount of county carry forward funding your county currently has accrued. $1,162,700 f. Two-year maximum calculated amount for applied carry forward funding. (2 times the amount calculated on your Form 6A, item 9, in rule 6OFF1-5.006) $1,368,182 g. Subtract the amount in 5f from the amount in 5e. ($205,482) h. If the amount in 5g is greater than zero, insert that number in the Budget Report as "carry forward funds applied." i. What is the cost per seat per year for the equipment or service? — $6,685 j. What is the funding source to continue this service or system once the grant period has expired? 911 Revenue and County Operating Funds Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin. Code R.60FF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 16 16J 2 6. Describe the existing system or service associated with this grant application. Include specific information on existing system equipment upgrades and when the installation of this equipment was completed. Please include the PSAP(s) that the grant will be implemented and number of position seats per PSAP. If applicable, please state if this is a part of a group or regional project and how you will be interoperable. Remaining system life less than 1-year. Last equipment refresh was in 2019. The current Vesta 911 Call Handling Equipment (CHE)is due for refresh or replacement due to hardware(Geo-diverse servers, routers, and console PC/hardware)age. Collier County would like to migrate to the new Vesta NXT full i3 cloud-based Call Handling(Infrastructure as-a-service—laaS) Equipment. This migration would take place over the period of the full grant period across both Primary PSAPs. System replacement (rather than refresh) is required to provision NG-911 i3 features and compatibility. In addition to the refresh, this project will allow Collier County with the i3 interoperability as identified in § 365.177, F.S. and the "Proposed Plan to Upgrade Florida's PSAPs". Specifically "prioritize the upgrade of PSAPs based on the population served by each PSAP, the capability of a jurisdiction or region to modernize PSAPs beyond legacy 911 infrastructure, and the ability of a jurisdiction or region to address interoperability between PSAPs." 7. Describe the scope of work for the proposed project including any goal(s) and objectives. Include the tasks to be performed as part of the project. Provide scope of work in quantifiable units of deliverables that shall be received and accepted. For each deliverable specify the required minimum level of service to be performed and the criteria for evaluating the successful completion of each deliverable. For any scope of work that includes milestones, please describe in detail what deliverables are expected to be provided in each milestone. The SOW includes a contract for project management& oversight, the purchase of on-premise firewalls, gateways, console PCs and associated hardware as well as system provisioning (Professional Services), 100 user licenses and 60 months of cloud services for all Collier County PSAP positions. Finally, included in this SOW is work required with other NGCS providers in the State to provide a transfer capability into at least one primary PSAP in each FL County as per§365.177, F.S. Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin. Code R.60FF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 17 16J 2 8. Justification of the need for the proposed project. Provide detailed information on the existing systems/components that need replacement. Document the condition with details to justify any system with an expected lifespan of less than one year. Each component on the system, (e.ci. memory, hardware, size of drives), updates of software and/or replacement versions needed, standalone equipment, and additional upgrades jinclude UPS1 must be listed in the requests. Existing Vesta 911 is not a fully-compliant i3 Call Handling system. In order to take advantage of the i3 feature set, migration requires a full system change, including system provisioning for call routing, answering positions, users, mapping, interoperability(call transfer and policy routing), etc. Additionally, moving to an laaS requires new agency provisioning and changes to the local ESlnet to ensure redundant connectivity to the cloud providers. 9. Describe why your county, group of counties or region will not be able to complete this project without this grant funding. Ultimately, this project will benefit from reduced system and circuit costs as NGCS will reside in the cloud alongside the Vesta NXT call handling instance. However, during the migration period, there will be costs associated with the existing CHE that will not be immediately eliminated and thus will overlap with the new service. There are also costs to establish the interoperability to the other PSAPs in Florida. There are not sufficient funds in the County's 911 Revenue to bear these additional start-up costs to implement the Next Gen system. Additionally, interoperability costs for this grant will reduce the cost for other counties to have similar functionality. 10. Describe the required steps with an anticipated time schedule which includes procurement and payment milestones and a total project completion date. • Project kick-off will be scheduled within 45 days of grant award. • Data gathering and cloud set up will begin after kick-off and take up to six months. • CCSO would expect to be "live"on Vesta NXT within eight months, while still leveraging Vesta911 at NPD in a hybrid mode. • Vendor will work on interoperability(911 policy routing and transfer to every FL County) over the remainder of the grant period. Milestone payments for interoperability as well as commencement for MRC will be based on NGCS connectivity with other NGCS providers. Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin. Code R.60FF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 18 16J 2 11. If applicable, sole source justification must meet the state procurement guidelines and chapter 287.057 (3)I, F.S. A sole source letter is provided for the interoperability work between Collier County's current NGCS provider MSI and the other NGCS providers in the State. Project management is using an ACS and the CHE upgrade includes two quotes. 12. If applicable, please include your previous service dates for any maintenance or support services. N/A System replacement. Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A,incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin. Code R.6OFF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 19 16J 2 13. Assurances ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS: The grantee accepts all grant terms and conditions. Grantee understands that grants are contingent upon the availability of funds. DISCLAIMER: The grantee certifies that the facts and information contained in this application and any attached documents are true and correct. If this requirement is violated, the grantee is subject to revocation of the grant and return of all grant funds and interest accrued (if any), pursuant to the Board authority and any other remedy provided by law. NOTIFICATION OF AWARDS: The grantee understands and accepts that the notice of award will be advertised on the Florida 911 website. MAINTENANCE OF IMPROVEMENT AND EXPANSION: The grantee agrees that any improvement, expansion or other effect brought about in whole or part by grant funds will be maintained. No substantial changes or departures from the original proposal shall be permitted unless the Board gives prior written authorization. Any unauthorized change will necessitate the return of grant funds, and accrued interest (if any) to the Board. The county certifies that all applicable state procurement rules/procedures have been met. Failure to use grant funds as represented jeopardizes the grantee's eligibility to be considered for future funding. 14. Authority I hereby affirm my authority and responsibility for the use of funds requested. rats SIGNA URE —CHAIR, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATE OR COUNTY MANGER/ADMINISTRATOR Burt L. Saunders, Chairman Po;.ition R:.g'.n:I ''gnatur- if Applicable (add additional lines if needed) Appro :I; , arm and legality l r ll i� ° i . rATTEST s Jeffrey A. atz w,County Attorney CRYST UK.KINZEL,CLERIC 'il BY: v> f -Aloe b Chairman's ltatur•01l1y Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin. Code R.6OFF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 20 16J 2 911 Grant Program Appendix I: Florida 911 Regional Map F.r.,..n Molokai x.v m Santa Reed Mahn. Wife. " -i - _ __ _ vmm�gron Gadsden ,... ./ Nee..0 ,bra Ber LaMrn i umn aew.en Aledbm .- 7`y/ H �^^' Baker Duvet LMry Waitaki / I Swwnw Cd,mt ai "-' - -S ,'Un,mn.,- Ctey G FranklinLrdryrdte SIirt . e.eemre Jo,,,, J f GkNM Dice Putnam ... F Wei . Lew —J Madan Whoa , Cimr Lake .j\ Sumter Florida 911 Regional Map Hernando Oran. (' l*PI ~r \ . Region 1 - Pensacola ""'`°°rough Polk"NI &weld\ Fill Region 2 -Tallahassee it _i Indian , i diver Region 3 -Jacksonville Manatee Wad*, � i -- ---rtigntene. Lroe Region 4 -Tampa ,S L (Won F. Region 5 - Orlando C"e"°gv Region 6 - Ft. Myersvvto:I. "lend" en Pe Beach • Region 7 - Miami Crrllt Bmwrd • Updated April 19,2023 - !r MsmKlaee Monroe A. .1,,. ar Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin.Code R.6OFF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 21 16J 2 911 Grant Program Addendum I : Funding Priorities The criteria for determining acceptability for disbursement of funds from the state of Florida 911 Grant Programs will be made on a PRIORITY basis. Regional 911 system project requests related to systems and equipment will be considered the highest priority within each priority category. If you do not see your specific 911 project listed, you are still eligible to receive funding and can apply. Funding may be adjusted by the Board. See section 7.4 1.0 Prepaid Funding Priorities PRIORITY 1: Primary and Secondary PSAP systems that require immediate system replacement to provision NG-911 status or when the expected remaining life of the system is less than one year. PRIORITY 2: Development and maintenance of statewide or regional routing, including geographic, and management information systems. A. Statewide routing system B. Regional, as an incremental step towards systems statewide 1. NGCS 2. GIS Repository 3. Map Display and Services C. GIS Services required for the delivery of a call 1. GIS Data support-assisting counties in meeting the 98% NENA GIS Data minimum standards 2. Creation of the required layers of the NENA GIS Data model 3. GIS Maintenance Tools- this includes software or Software as a Service (SaaS) D. Management Information System and services E. Cybersecurity 1. Cybersecurity assessments 2. Cybersecurity hardware and software 3. Ongoing cybersecurity maintenance PRIORITY 3: Implementation and maintenance of Next Generation 911 services and equipment. Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin. Code R.60FF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 22 16J 2 A. Maintenance costs for Next-Generation capable call handling systems for medium-sized counties with fewer than 100,000 residents as determined by Florida Association of Counties population data. Counties receiving grants under this priority are not eligible for annual CHS maintenance cost reimbursement. PRIORITY 4: Mapping system and services necessary for provisioning Geographic Information Systems (GIS). This includes the following, listed in order of funding priority: A. Map System Equipment - map generation hardware and software licensing are limited to components for two stations. B. GIS Centerline point generation and map accuracy systems C. Synchronization of GIS data and databases that support location repositories to meet a minimum 98% data accuracy for Geospatial call routing. D. Tactical mapping and services PRIORITY 5: Systems that require new or replacement of critical or necessary hardware or software. This includes the following back-up PSAP's system equipment, listed in order of funding priority A-J: A. Hardware and software for communications or terminal equipment located at a PSAP for 911 call processing, ANI and ALI display, call answering, and transcription service. B. Map Display Equipment C. Logging Equipment D. Lightning Protection Equipment E. Uninterruptible Power Supply system and or Generator Equipment F. County, group of counties or region Standalone ALI Database Equipment G. 911 Call Taker Position Equipment H. Net clock J. Computer Aided Dispatch Application and instructions for 911 Grant Programs, revised January 2025 W Form 3A, incorporated by reference in Fla.Admin.Code R.60FF1-5.003 911 Grant Programs 23 1 6 J 2 \ @ \ R NC q ? \ / \ \ \ / 0 N. $ƒ\ ƒ/ƒ q q 8 — ° 7 0 0 ~ In Q i : 2 \ - / - o 0 2 J - c 15 a. o co S Q E % >, c ¢ \ C CI J k a / — / / £ 08 Q 0 - - 2 2 , I. C0 k F ) / J % / & > - 0 2 — 11 D k2 L= CIS 2 ± / a \\\ } \ \ 0 ° 1 0 / @ t$ 2 @ $ / 2\/ g co 7 \ n g a f a % _1 J o ) / � S 2 d � - ± a CC© ) 2 CO 4.9 > ° / d CD - / / § PR o CDU. Lt mi. @ 7 = _ M £ Q R 2 { g Co kf _ U. cz 0 S m 2 _ ] & { E co 0 K a)c3 £ » ow f 2 C 2 -0 ® e & k 2 \ /m ± k £ / C) @ / _\ 6 \ � - \ c } § a •/ @% a r Q 73 a \ kE / /Gr 2 7 7c 0 = 03 / \ ? \ « x _ C. } k / \ ^ .E 6 / � g7 ./ .[ j \ \ 2 / / q 2 � � / ') 644 § 44 � ' ® ` a. 1— 2\« \ t 7 ® / \ ƒ co }ƒ ( - a 2 E ) ' \ ° \ » ¢ — / ) ( ) - } k0 • � @ > z •7E e z � - E \ / $ , $ a @ C) o » ^ C I 0 O. o m2 < > -. 6 j = � z 6J 2 Master Sales Agreement#: C13594 PSMTMS Date: 5/23/2025 Master Maintenance Agreement#: C13594 PSMTMS Page#: 1 of 3 Documents#: OP-000829021 SO-000936213 Solution Name: VESTA NXT Cloud Services Customer: Collier County Sheriff's Office Solution Summary VESTA NXT Cloud Services -- ---- ----- Customer: Collier County Sheriff's Office Primary Contact: Justin Koval Ship To Address: 3319 TAMIAMI TRL E Email: justin.koval@colliersheriff.org NAPLES, FL 34112-4901 Phone: (239)252-9374 Bill To Address: 3319 TAMIAMI TRL E Account Executive: Brian Kelley NAPLES, FL 34112-4901 Customer ID: VTWCOLC000001 Email: bkelley@onecl.com Customer PO: Phone: +17202795812 Solution Summary Billing Frequency Due Total Project Hardware Per the Agreement $2,320,647.79 $2,320,647.79 Professional Services One-Time $168,479.87 $168,479.87 Maintenance Other Maintenance Prepaid $900.00 $900.00 Resale Services Prepaid $69,609.69 $69,609.69 Project Subtotal $2,559,637.35 Estimated Tax NOT INCLUDED Estimated Freight NOT INCLUDED Estimated Recycling Fee NOT INCLUDED Project Total $2,559,637.35 This Solution Summary summarizes the document(s)that are attached hereto and such documents are incorporated herein by reference(collectively,this"Order"). Customer's signature on this Order(or Customer's issuance of a purchase order in connection with this Order)shall represent Customer's agreement with each document in this Order and acknowledgement that such attached document(s)are represented accurately by this Solution Summary. Unless otherwise specified in this Order,this Order shall be subject to the following terms and conditions(the"Agreement"):(i)the Master Sales Agreement or other applicable agreement in effect as of the date hereof between ConvergeOne,Inc.and/or its subsidiaries and affiliates(collectively,"Cl"or"Seller")and Customer;or(ii)if no such applicable agreement is currently in place between Cl and Customer,the Online General Terms and Conditions currently found on the internet at: https://www.onecl.com/agreements. If Customer's Agreement is a master agreement entered into with one of Cl predecessors,affiliates and/or subsidiaries("Legacy Master Agreement"),the terms and conditions of such Legacy Master Agreement shall apply to this Order,subject to any modifications,located at: https://www.onecl.com/agreements. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions in the Agreement and this Order,the order of precedence shall be as follows:(i)this Order(with the most recent and specific document controlling if there are conflicts between the Solution Summary and any applicable supporting document (s)incorporated into this Order),(ii)Attachment A to the Agreement(if applicable),and(iii)the main body of the Agreement. This Order may include the sale of any of the following to Customer:(a)any hardware,third party software,and/or Seller software(collectively,"Products");(b)any installation services,professional services,and/or third party provided support services that are generally associated with the Products and sold to customers by Seller (collectively,"Professional Services"); (c)any Seller-provided vendor management services,software release management services,remote monitoring services and/or, troubleshooting services(collectively,"Managed Services"); and/or(d)any Seller-provided maintenance services ordered by Customer to maintain and service Supported Products or Supported Systems at Supported Sites to ensure that they operate in conformance with their respective documentation and specifications(collectively, "Maintenance Services"). For ease of reference only,Professional Services,Managed Services and Maintenance Services may be referred to collectively as"Services." Unless otherwise defined herein,capitalized terms used herein will have the same meanings as set forth in the Agreement. Products and/or Services not specifically itemized are not provided hereunder. This Order will be valid for a period of thirty(30)days following the date hereof. Thereafter,this Order will no longer be of any force and effect. Due to rapidly changing prices in the market for third party Products and/or Services,after the expiration of the foregoing 30 day period,Seller reserves the right to adjust offerings and/or prices accordingly prior to issuing any new Order(s). This Order is a configured order and/or contains software. ACCEPTED BY: BUYER: DATE: SELLER: DATE: TITLE: TITLE: CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF Cl 1 6 J 2 Ell Master Sales Agreement#: C13594 PSMTMS Date: 5/23/2025 Master Maintenance Agreement#: C13594 PSMTMS Page#: 2 of 3 Documents#: OP-000829021 SO-000936213 Solution Name: VESTA NXT Cloud Services Customer: Collier County Sheriff's Office Master Agreement Rider # Item Number Description Term In Qty Unit Price Extended Price Months Emergency Services Center 1 SSVOOS02795A VESTA NXT CLOUD* 60 1 $20,554.82 $20,554.82 2 04000-09206 SWITCH 9200 24-PORT W/24X7 5YR 4 $4,250.75 $17,003.00 3 SSVOOS03945A PUBLIC INPUT SERVICE* 60 1 $0.00 $0.00 4 SSVOOS03946A TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE* 60 1 $0.00 $0.00 5 SSVOOS03947A MAPPING SERVICE* 60 1 $0.00 $0.00 6 SSV00S03948A DATA ASSIST SERVICE* 60 1 $0.00 $0.00 7 64007-50026 KEYPAD 24-KEY USB CBL 6FT 49 $90.50 $4,434.50 8 SSVOOS01450B LEARNER LXP SUBSCRIPTION* 60 100 $0.00 $0.00 9 Professional Professional Services $58,022.62 Services 10 04000-00220 RS-232 2-PORT SHARING 1U 110/220VAC 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 11 03800-03070 FIREWALL 60F 2 $685.75 $1,371.50 12 04000-00219 8-PORT RS-232 DATACAST 1U 110/220VAC 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 13 03800-03075 WARR FIREWALL 60F 5YR 2 $600.00 $1,200.00 14 65000-03040 CBL NULL MODEM DB25M/M 3 $16.50 $49.50 15 SSVOOS04903A SSVOOSO4903A-VESTA NXT CLOUD PER USER FEE 100 $14,042.77 $1,404,277.00 16 04000-02919 USB CONSOLE CBL 4 $75.00 $300.00 17 SSVOOSO4916A SSVOOSO4916A-SOFTWARE SUPPORT 1 $0.00 $0.00 18 854304-00101 854304-00101-RTI HARDWARE KIT 49 $1,675.00 $82,075.00 Emergency Services Center Subtotal: $1,591,987.94 Naples Police Department 19 SSVOOS02795A VESTA NXT CLOUD* 60 1 $25,896.33 $25,896.33 20 04000-09206 SWITCH 9200 24-PORT W/24X7 5YR 2 $4,250.75 $8,501.50 21 SSVOOS03945A PUBLIC INPUT SERVICE* 60 1 $0.00 $0.00 22 SSVOOS03946A TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE* 60 1 $0.00 $0.00 23 SSVOOS03947A MAPPING SERVICE* 60 1 $0.00 $0.00 24 SSV00S03948A DATA ASSIST SERVICE* 60 1 $0.00 $0.00 25 64007-50026 KEYPAD 24-KEY USB CBL 6FT 7 $90.50 $633.50 26 SSVOOS01450B LEARNER LXP SUBSCRIPTION* 60 15 $0.00 $0.00 27 Professional Professional Services $43,793.57 Services 28 04000-00220 RS-232 2-PORT SHARING 1U 110/220VAC 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 29 854431-00001 VESTA NXT NETWORK Appliance 1 $7,485.14 $7,485.14 30 04000-02919 USB CONSOLE CBL 2 $75.00 $150.00 31 03800-03070 FIREWALL 60F 2 $685.75 $1,371.50 32 03800-03075 WARR FIREWALL 60F 5YR 2 $600.00 $1,200.00 33 04000-00219 8-PORT RS-232 DATACAST 1U 110/220VAC 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 34 65000-03040 CBL NULL MODEM DB25M/M 3 $16.50 $49.50 35 SSVOOSO4903A SSVOOSO4903A-VESTA NXT CLOUD PER USER FEE 15 $17,692.01 $265,380.15 36 SSVOOSO4916A SSVOOSO4916A-SOFTWARE SUPPORT 1 $0.00 $0.00 37 854304-00101 854304-00101-RTI HARDWARE KIT 7 $1,675.00 $11,725.00 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF Cl 16J 1 El Master Sales Agreement#: C13594 PSMTMS Date: 5/23/2025 Master Maintenance Agreement#: C13594 PSMTMS Page#: 3 of 3 Documents#: OP-000829021 SO-000936213 Solution Name: VESTA NXT Cloud Services Customer: Collier County Sheriff's Office # Item Number Description Term In Qty Unit Price Extended Price Months 38 04000-01605 WARR NBD Z240/Z2 WKST 5YR 2 $450.00 $900.00 Naples Police Department Subtotal: $369,786.19 District 4 39 SSVOOS02795A VESTA NXT CLOUD* 60 1 $23,158.54 $23,158.54 40 04000-09206 SWITCH 9200 24-PORT W/24X7 5YR 2 $4,250.75 $8,501.50 41 SSV00S03945A PUBLIC INPUT SERVICE* 60 1 $0.00 $0.00 42 SSVOOS03946A TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE* 60 1 $0.00 $0.00 43 SSVOOS03947A MAPPING SERVICE* 60 1 $0.00 $0.00 44 SSVOOS03948A DATA ASSIST SERVICE* 60 1 $0.00 $0.00 45 64007-50026 KEYPAD 24-KEY USB CBL 6FT 11 $90.50 $995.50 46 SSVOOS01450B LEARNER LXP SUBSCRIPTION* 60 30 $0.00 $0.00 47 Professional Professional Services $39,163.68 Services 48 04000-00220 RS-232 2-PORT SHARING 1U 110/220VAC 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 49 03800-03070 FIREWALL 60F 2 $685.75 $1,371.50 50 04000-00219 8-PORT RS-232 DATACAST 1U 110/220VAC 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 51 03800-03075 WARR FIREWALL 60F 5YR 2 $600.00 $1,200.00 52 65000-03040 CBL NULL MODEM DB25M/M 3 $16.50 $49.50 53 SSVOOSO4903A SSVOOSO4903A-VESTA NXT CLOUD PER USER FEE 30 $15,821.60 $474,648.00 54 04000-02919 USB CONSOLE CBL 2 $75.00 $150.00 55 SSVOOSO4916A SSVOOSO4916A-SOFTWARE SUPPORT 1 $0.00 $0.00 56 854304-00101 854304-00101-RTI HARDWARE KIT 11 $1,675.00 $18,425.00 District 4 Subtotal: $570,363.22 ConvergeOne Professional Services 57 Professional Professional Services $27,500.00 Services ConvergeOne Professional Services Subtotal: $27,500.00 Total: $2,559,637.35 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF Cl 1 6J 2 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS May 22, 2025 Bob Finney III 911 Coordinator 8075 Lely Cultural Parkway Naples, FL 34113 RE: Motorola Sole Source for Collier County's NENA i3 Conference/Transfer Service Dear Mr. Finney: You have requested that Motorola Solutions Connectivity, Inc. (Motorola), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Motorola Solutions, Inc., provide Collier County, FL a sole source letter for NENA i3 call conference and transfers between Collier County and to all Florida County Primary 9-1-1 centers. Because Collier County currently subscribes to Motorola's 9-1-1 call routing service, NENA i3 call conference and transfer service between other jurisdictions/systems and Collier County can only be provided by the applicable provider of the call routing service, Motorola. Any other proposed solution would require bypassing Motorola's 9-1-1 call routing service. Sincerely, Katharine Gard Motorola Solutions Connectivity, Inc. Director, NG9-1-1 Core Services Sales Niotorol.Solution..( on nec In it .Inc.,( hic.go Office 500 W.Monroe St. Chicago,IL 60661 1 6 J 2 il/I © MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS Collier County, FL NENA i•3 Transfer Budgetary May 22, 2025 Motorola Solutions Connectivity,Inc.,is a wholly owned subsidiary of Motorola Solutions,Inc.This document is protected by copyright law and international treaties,and is the information of Motorola Solutions Connectivity,Inc.All trademarks,service marks,product names,brands,company names and logos appearing in this document are the property of their respective owners VESTA®is a registered trademark of Motorola Solutions Connectivity,Inc. MOTOROLA, MOTO, MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, and the Stylized M Logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC and are used under license All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners ©2025 All rights reserved. 16J 2 Collier County,FL May 22,2025 i3 Transfer Proposal Table of Contents 13 to i3 Interoperability 2 High Level Budgetary Pricing 2 Additional Considerations 3 Table of Contents GI MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS Use or disclosure of this proposal is subject to the restrictions on the cover page. Motorola Solutions Connectivity Confidential Restricted Page 1 16J 2 Collier County,FL May 22,2025 i3 Transfer Proposal May 22, 2025 Bob Finney III 911 Coordinator 8075 Lely Cultural Parkway Naples, FL 34113 Dear Bob: Motorola Solutions Connectivity, Inc. (Motorola), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Motorola Solutions, Inc., is pleased to provide Collier County, FL this high-level pricing for NENA i3 call conference and transfers to all Florida County Primary 9-1-1 centers. This pricing is for budgetary purposes only and is not an offer for sale. Should Collier County choose to move forward and connect to any of the PSAPs, a firm quote and finalized contract documentation will be required prior to execution of a change order. i3 to i3 Interoperability Improving interoperability between agencies is a goal of the current NENA i3 Standard (NENA-STA- 010.3-2016). An i3 call consists of SIP delivery with header information such as Subscriber.info, Provider.info, Service.info, and possibly device.info as well as location delivered in CLDXF formatted PIDF-LO. Motorola is prepared to support Collier County's NENA i3 interconnection with other agencies in Florida. This high-level cost estimate outlines the operational and technical interactions required for interoperability in the form of NENA i3 call conferencing and transfers between Collier County and other PSAPs in the State of Florida. The timeframe of accomplishing NENA i3 interconnection with other Florida PSAPs is dependent on other 9-1-1 call routing service providers demonstrating NENA i3-defined transfer capabilities, and the ability of the call handling equipment utilized by the relevant peer PSAPs being able to receive and process the NENA i3 call. Therefore, a Motorola project manager will generate a matrix of each PSAP to which Collier County requests to interconnect with for the purpose of NENA i3-based call conference & transfer. It will be incumbent upon Collier County to inform Motorola of a PSAP's readiness to engage in this process. As PSAPs and their 9-1-1 call routing service providers are capable of accepting an i3 call, we will coordinate the configuration of those transfers to allow the testing of call conference and transfers to those relevant PSAPs. High Level Budgetary Pricing The following section provides high level budgetary pricing for testing and implementing NENA i3 call conference and transfer between Collier County and one primary PSAP in each Florida county. This proposed scope of services includes relevant network interconnection, configuration, testing, and associated project management services. ®MOTOROLA SO II 7-IONS Use or disclosure of this proposal is subject to the restrictions on the cover page Motorola Solutions Connectivity Confidential Restricted Page 2 16J 2 Collier County,FL May 22,2025 i3 Transfer Proposal Cost Estimate for NENA i3 Call Transfer Capabilities Motorola NENA i3 Call Transfer Service- Scope NRC Monthly Total for 60 (range) Rate per months month Estimate of cost per County Primary PSAP $14,640 $354 $35,880 Estimate of Total Cost across the State of Florida $980,881 $23,718 $2,403,961 66 Transfer Points + Collier County The ability for the Collier County Emergency Communication Center to initiate a NENA i3 9-1-1 call conference and transfer capability to each relevant Florida County PSAP defined will be contracted via individual change orders. These change orders will be provided when the target PSAP and their associated 9-1-1 call routing service provider are ready to receive a NENA i3 call conference and transfer from external 9-1-1 call routing service providers, such as Motorola. Additional Considerations • Each target PSAP must meet specific criteria prior to Motorola's engagement: - Each respective PSAP's 9-1-1 call routing service provider must have executed an i3 Network-to-Network Interface (NNI) agreement with Motorola. - Each respective PSAP's 9-1-1 call routing service provider must have successfully completed Motorola's peer i3 Network-to-Network (NNI) interoperability testing lab and certification program - Each PSAP's call-handling equipment must be able to receive and process NENA i3-based call conferences and transfers. • Motorola will inform Collier County when peer 9-1-1 call routing service providers operating within the state of Florida have a fully executed NNI agreement and have successfully completed Motorola's peer call routing network NNI interoperability certification. • Collier County will be responsible to inform Motorola of a county's, or group of counties', readiness to engage in the NENA i3 call conference/transfer interoperation and to request a change order to initiate each project. • Collier County and/or their existing 9-1-1 call handling service provider, ConvergeOne, will be responsible for any and all configuration changes required to their VESTA 9-1-1 call handling system, including the set-up of transfer buttons and testing the transfer capability. Motorola appreciates the opportunity to assist Collier County and the State of Florida in advancing NENA i3 call transfer capabilities. Sincerely, Katharine Gard Motorola Solutions Connectivity, Inc. Director, NG9-1-1 Core Services Sales ®MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS Use or disclosure of this proposal is subject to the restrictions on the cover page. Motorola Solutions Connectivity Confidential Restricted Page 3 16J 2 © MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS May 22, 2025 Mr. Bob Finney, Director Communications Technology 8075 Lely Cultural Pkwy Naples, FL 32113 Mr. Finney, I am in receipt of your request for Motorola Solutions to provide a direct quote to you for a VestaNXT call-handling system. Due to contractual obligations, we are unable to provide Collier County FL with a direct quote. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Dan Bornstein Sr. Account Manager- Florida Motorola Solutions 951-401-1744 Mailing Address:Vesta Solutions, Inc. P.O. Box 9007,Temecula, CA 92589-9007 U.S.A. Physical Address:Vesta Solutions, Inc.42555 Rio Nedo,Temecula, CA 92590 U.S.A. vestapu bl icsafety.com 16J 2 , __mi t A_ ,11111111111‘ diiiiiii•K -:— 1„ , AL . ..0.. i , / .01. / ' \ i, \ , iL, _...,,, -.L.- ,..\ iff " .. Waillh6. i , , //, . . , N., v .\\,„ / , 4. -... , 1 - . , f -, t ..„ ,,e. -- 1 , • _ , , d 0 ,, pm Proposal i3 Call Handling Equipment Migration Support May 15, 2025 ■VI Collier County Sheriff's Office, Florida MissionCriticalPartners 16 Table of Contents Introduction Letter Statement of Services Project Understanding 3 Project Approach 3 Scope of Work 3 Task 1: Project Kickoff and Contract Review/Negotiations 3 Task 2: Implementation Support 4 Project I eaiu 5 Organizational Chart 6 Resumes 7 Experience 14 Representative Project Experience 15 Pricing 20 M MissionCriticalPartners 1 6 J 2 Introduction Letter May 15, 2025 Bob Finney Director of Communications Technology Collier County Sheriffs Office 3319 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Re: Proposal for i3 Call Handling Equipment Migration Support Dear Mr. Finney: Mission Critical Partners® (MCP) appreciates the opportunity to provide this proposal to the Collier County Sheriff's Office (CCSO), for i3 call handling equipment(CHE) migration support. The MCP team serves as an independent agent with considerable experience in local government management roles and extensive experience in performing public safety consulting services for state, local, and federal government entities. MCP is prepared to serve the Collier County Sheriff's Office by assisting with achieving optimal delivery of emergency communications services—because the mission matters. If you have any questions regarding the information submitted, please contact me at 724.333.4590, or via email at BrianMelcer(a�MissionCriticalPartners.com. On behalf of our entire team, we stand behind the Collier County Sheriff's Office to serve as your partner and advocate. Sincerely, Mission Critical Partners -i777 /7/ Brian R. Melcer, ENP Regional Director, Client Services M MissionCriticalPartners 1tiJ 'L Statement of Services 16J 2 Project Understanding Mission Critical Partners®understands that the Collier County Sheriffs Office (CCSO) has identified the need to obtain project management support of the migration from Vesta 911 to Vesta NXT call handling services. Project Approach MCP will use proven methods, its industry expertise and experience, as well as knowledge of best practices, to help CCSO realize its vision to transition to Vesta NXT CHE. The tasks associated with the success of this project include: • Providing technical support, review and suggested edits during contract negotiation • • Assessing what success looks like for every stakeholder and working to achieve success metrics • Coordinating with CCSO to assess the CHE connection options • Assisting with mitigating risks while operating in hybrid mode prior to full implementation • Assisting with CHE interoperability design and acceptance testing • Supporting CHE system implementation Scope of Work Task 1 : Project Kickoff and Contract Review/Negotiations MCP will conduct an on-site project initiation meeting with CCSO's project team stakeholder representatives to: Initiation Meeting Review • Establish mutual acquaintance • Project and task milestones • Clarify roles and expectations • Schedules and deliverables • Review and seek alignment on the desired outcomes, deliverables, and timeline • Project budget • Establish a decision-making process to guide the project • Scheduling of progress and enable successful outcomes to be achieved review meetings MCP's project manager will facilitate the meeting. To establish the • Review of existing project baseline, MCP will meet with CCSO and its stakeholders to documentation capture expectations regarding the project and definition of success. CCSO and MCP will use Task 1 to secure a mutual understanding of CCSO's future vision. Task 1 1. Contract Negotiation Support Projects involving migrations, such as CHE implementation, have multiple complexities and nuances that require a holistic view before embarking on execution. Requirements need to be enforced in the contract language. Without these requirements, MCP has observed that other 911 entities have been contractually required to pay for equipment that did not function as expected.. M MissionCriticalPartners 3 16J 2 MCP will assist CCSO in the negotiation of the contract with the selected vendor. This includes: • Analyzing the respondent's proposed solution to confirm it meets the requirements • Provide technical expertise to review the CHE contract and make recommendations on suggested edits • Supporting CCSO in its review of"mandatory"versus"optional" costs, where applicable, and serving as CCSO's advocate in this process • Supporting the development of the contract statement of work (SOW) based on the vendor's proposal The deliverables and assumptions related to Task 1 are listed below: El Deliverables. Ef0 ❑ • Meeting agenda one week before meeting date ❑ • Meeting notes within 10 business days of meeting • Review and red-line edits of proposed SOW from vendor • Contract review and recommendations • Scheduled project update calls, frequency based on CCSO's guidance Assumptions: g • CCSO will coordinate the schedules of non-MCP stakeholders. • CCSO will provide a meeting space to accommodate all stakeholders. Task 2: Implementation Support MCP will provide technical subject-matter expertise assistance to CCSO in support of preparation and transition to the new CHE, including vendor oversight and coordination. This assistance is to ensure that CCSO information is provided in a consistent and timely fashion to the vendor in support of a timely migration to the new CHE. MCP will coordinate between CCSO and Motorola to ensure future compatibility. MCP will document integration points and data exchange requirements and ensure the system design meets contractual commitments. MCP will provide technical assistance to CCSO to assess the CHE connection options. In addition, MCP will assist CCSO in maintaining an overall schedule for the implementation and assist to mitigate risks while operating in a hybrid environment. MCP will support CCSO in preparing comprehensive test cases and service validation checklists to assist in acceptance testing preparation and transition cutover to the new CHE. The deliverables related to Task 2 are listed below: a Deliverables: Eff0 O • SME support for vendor coordination and meetings ❑ • Technical guidance on interconnection options • Review and update the vendor's test plan • Prepare and execute CHE acceptance testing for CCSO • MissionCriticalPartners 4 16J L Project Team 16J 2 With more than 225 staff members, MCP's specialized professionals are integral members of our team: MCP's Specialized Professionals • Former public safety communications operations • Emergency Number Professionals (ENPs) staff, managers, directors, and executives • Project Management Professionals (PMPs) • Technology, forensic, and policy specialists • Former law enforcement, fire, and EMS • Operations and training specialists • Programming, design, and construction • GIS specialists specialists MCP has identified in the figure below the key team members from our staff that we plan to assign to this important project. Organizational Chart COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, FLORIDA Brian Melcer, ENP J _ _ _ — Sherri Griffith Powell, ENP Client Services Director Program Manager Robert Horne,ENP Project Manager Jamie Sullivan, PMP Dave Boyce Technical SME Network SME Phil Rizzo Other MCP SMEs Technical SME As Required Figure 1: Project Team M MissionCriticalPartners 6 16J 2 Each team member brings a unique skill set and depth of experience in 911 CHE and networks. Additional resources and subject-matter experts are available also, as we are a full-service firm focused on all aspects of public safety communications. Resumes Resumes highlighting our qualifications and experience are included on the following pages. M Mission 'Partners 7 16J 2 Brian R. Melcer, ENP Regional Director, Client Services — Eastern US, Mission Critical Partners Brian, as the former Director of Public Safety(DPS)in Lawrence County, Pennsylvania, oversaw several transformational projects including the complete rewrite of the County's operational policies, training program, new hire recruitment program and quality assurance program. In his tenure at Lawrence County, he also served as the County's voting delegate to the Southwestern Pennsylvania Emergency Response Group(Region 13)Counter Terrorism Task Force, where he served as chair of the regional ESlnet and WestCORE upgrade subcommittees. Brian served as President of PA NENA during Pennsylvania's rewrite of its 911 legislation and funding program. He has significant experience in program review, budgeting and operational analysis, consolidation of systems, statewide deployments as well as regionalization of shared resources. Brian is still active in the fire service as a Deputy Fire Chief in his community and is an active fire instructor with the Pennsylvania State Fire Academy. Industry Experience 34 years Representative Experience Education Stele/h'eyiorial Expetiencc • Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency(PEMA) B.S., Human Resources, - NG911 planning, procurement and implementation Geneva College, PA Rewrite NG911 legislation and funding program Certifications * Pennsylvania counties of Allegheny, Armstrong. Beaver, Butler, Fayette, Greene, Indiana, Lawrence, Mercer, Somerset,Westmoreland, Washington and Venango Emergency Number - Technical support for regional CAD and NG911 GIS system implementations Professional(ENP) • Southwestern Pennsylvania Emergency Response Group(PA Region 13) Advanced Emergency - ESlnet expansion and lifecycle management, enterprise client manager Management - Regional NG911 GIS readiness Coordinator, FF-I, FF-II, - Regionwide cybersecurity assessment, remediation and monitoring Fire Instructor I, Hazardous Materials City/Courity txperri;ric Awareness/Operations, • Allegheny County, PA-911 technology and operational support of PSAP relocation Vehicle Rescue • Cuyahoga County, OH—Communications system assessment Technician, Hazardous • Hamilton, OH—Strategic planning Materials Technician • Butler, Cambria, Lawrence, Mercer and Washington counties, PA—Radio communications Associations project for new P25 radio system • Kane, Lake, St. Clair and Winnebago counties, IL—Consolidation implementation and National Emergency migration plans Number Association • Richmond, VA—Emergency Management Agency assessment (NENA) PA Past • Washington, DC—Office of Unified Communications technology and facility programming President Association of Public- Additional Experien.7, Safety Communications • Lawrence County, PA—Former Director of Public Safety Officials(APCO) Oversaw vision, design and implementation of a multimillion-dollar capital program for the DPS (9-1-1 and EOC)facility and a countywide P25 VHF International Association Phase II radio system including green field tower site construction of Fire Chiefs(IAFC)— - Reorganized and consolidated emergency management and 911 functions Volunteer&Combination * Southwestern Pennsylvania Emergency Response Group(PA Region 13) Officers Section(VCOS) Led 13-county regional Vesta CPE solution, serving as WestCORE Committee Pennsylvania Keystone chair from inception to implementation phase Chapter Fire Service - Supported procurement of a regional CAD solution with multiple counties Instructors - Implemented county fire academy M 0 Missioncritica!Partners 8 16J 2 Sherri Griffith Powell, ENP Manager, 91 i Services, Mission Critical Partners Sherri, as the manager of MCP's 911 services team, specializes in NG911 planning, funding, procurement, implementation and text-to-911 Sherri has presented text-to-911, as well as other industry topics, at the national, state and local levels and is recognized as an industry • SME on the interim short message service(SMS)text-to-911 solution. Her additional ON A► experience includes 911 legislation, 911 leadership training and facilitation of NG911, strategic planning and NASNA groups. • Representative Experience Fr,ri,,.n!FY;nrrinnrr •a • U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)National 911 Program—Leader of State of 911 webinar series and SME contributor Industry Experience • National Association of State 911 Administrators(NASNA)—Facilitator of Emergency 30 years Communications Interoperability workshops to assist states with creating statewide interoperability initiatives Education State/Rec'; ,at Experien B.A., Theatre Arts, • New York Division of Homeland Security& Emergency Services—Project manager for St. Edwards University, NG911 readiness assessment, strategic plan, and legislative assessment TX • Gulf Coast Regional 9-1-1 Emergency Communications District, TX—Project manager for Certifications NG911 readiness assessment, call-handling equipment(CHE)assessment, GIS assessment and network assessment; program manager for NG911 and CHE Emergency Number procurement and implementation Professional(ENP) • Maryland—Working group facilitator and funding SME for the 911 Commission Report to Public Communication Legislature; creator of text-to-911 public education campaign and Issues Management • Minnesota—Program manager for crisis communications planning, NG911 transition Certificate Series, planning and 911 cost study University of Texas • New Mexico—Project manager for NG911 assessment, strategic plan, network Leadership Development assessment and NG911 requirements Training, Daniels College • Oklahoma—Project manager for NG911 strategic plan, NG911 feasibility study and report of Business, CO to assess the deployment of E911 in five counties North Central Texas Emergency Communications District(NCT9-1-1)—Program manager Associations • in developing master plan, crisis communications plan, certificated telecommunications National Emergency utility requirements policy, Next Generation 911 Core Services requirements, CHE Number Association procurement, SmartRegion network design and continuity planning (NENA) • 911 Association of Central Oklahoma Governments(911 ACOG)—Project manager for Association of Public NG911 and CHE implementation, a participant in strategic planning and workforce Safety Communications optimization reports and leader in funding assessment Officials(APCO) • Capital Area Council of Governments(CAPCOG),TX—Project manager for strategic planning and CHE procurement Chair, NENA Text-to- • Western Pennsylvania County Regional ESlnet(WestCORE), PA—Technical support for 9-1-1 Working Group text-to-91 1 regional deployment Co-Chair of the NENA Women in 9-1-1 Alliance • Cincinnati, OH—Project manager for GIS operational support, CAD network assessment, Communications Security radio microwave requirements and PSAP assessment Reliability and • Tarrant County, TX—Project manager for NG911 procurement and text-to-911 feasibility Interoperability Council study; participant in NG911 assessment (CSRIC) • MissionCriticalPartners 9 � 6J 2 Robert Horne Manager, GIS/911 Technology, Mission Critical Partners Robert has built a successful career fostering prosperous relationships between local, regional, state and federal technology programs. He has experience with integrating people, processes, systems and data into 911 PSAPs, EOCs, fire and police command centers and ,. fusion centers across the country. Areas of specialization include federal, state, tribal, and regional interoperability, strategic and implementation planning, data modeling and reporting, business process reengineering and standard operating procedures development. Robert is the Manager of the GIS and 911 Technologies teams. 1. Representative Experience ' Fprlprni Fxnerienrr • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)National 911 Program— Industry Experience National GIS capabilities gap analysis and strategic plan 31 years Stale/Kegiunal Experience Maryland 911 Board—NG911 Spatial Interface(SI)data analysis and readiness Education • assessment and statewide NG911 GIS strategic plan and implementation support: B.S., Computer Science, continuous contract since 2018 Business Information • Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency(PEMA)—NG911 GIS strategic planning Systems, Columbia and statewide implementation coordination: continuous contract since 2017 Southern University, AL • Pennsylvania Region 13 Task Force—NG911 GIS readiness gap analysis and five-year Certifications strategic plans for each of the 15-member jurisdictions and the region • Arizona 911 Program—NG911 GIS strategic plan and statewide education and outreach Federal Emergency Arizona 911 Program—NG911 GIS readiness gap analysis for every local 911 system Management Agency •• Virginia Information Technologies Agency(VITA)—GIS needs analysis and (FEMA) Emergency implementation planning and NG911 strategic planning roadmap Management Institute, Certified Emergency • Nebraska Public Service Commission(NPSC)—NG911 strategic planning and GIS Operations Center support and wireless integrity testing Manager • Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Emergency Communications Networks—NG911 strategic planning and GIS support The State of Florida, • District of Columbia Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency Disaster Recovery (HSEMA)—Creation of a geospatial program for EMA, providing support for 3 presidential Operations(G385)"Train inaugurations, 78 federal national security special events and more than 100 natural and the Trainer" human-created disaster activations; management of a team of six analysts Associations • Washington. DC, Washington Regional Threat Analysis Center(WRTAC)—Development and management of geospatial intelligence program, providing law enforcement sensitive National Emergency and classified analysis of law enforcement, health and homeland security data for steady Number Association state operations, national security events and emergency response (NENA) Git 'r' mty Exn� � Maryland State Geographic Information • Atlanta, GA—CAD and GIS integration and migration support Committee(MSGIC) • Fairfax County, VA—NG911 GIS readiness assessment project support • Carroll County, MD—NG911 GIS readiness assessment and data improvement • Charles County, MD—Fire and EMS assessment and strategic plan • Burke County, NC—NG911 GIS readiness assessment and project management • Wake County, NC—Emergency management study and gap analysis M MissionCritica►Partners 10 1 6 J Jamie Sullivan, PMP Senior lechnology Specialist, Mission Critical Partners Jamie has years of technical project management experience and a thorough understanding of the technologies serving public safety agencies. For the past eight years, he has focused exclusively on NG911-related projects for various public safety agencies. He takes a do-it 1111. - right-the-first-time approach to work and looks for practical/efficient ways to achieve project objectives. Representative Experience • Arizona—Statewide NG911 transition support • Illinois—Statewide NG911 deployment • Minnesota—Statewide NG911 consulting Industry Experience • Georgia—Statewide NG911 RFP development 20 years • Tennessee Emergency Communications Board (TECB)—General NG911 consulting • North Central Texas Emergency Communications District(NCT9-1-1)—NG911 Education procurement and transition support B.S., Math and Business • Capital Area Council of Governments(CAPCOG), TX—Call-handling RFP development Management, Plymouth • 911 Association of Central Oklahoma Governments(911 ACOG)—NG911 consulting State University, NH • National Capital Region(NCR)—Technical support for various NG911 projects Certifications • Indian Nation Association of Central Oklahoma(INCOG)—NG911 assessment • Kentucky—Statewide NG911 procurement Project Management Professional(PMP) City/County Experience Associations • Baltimore, MD—NG911 transition support • Garland, TX—NG911 procurement Project Management • Philadelphia, PA—Text-to-911 consulting Institute(PMI) • Montgomery County, TX—NG911 procurement and technical support NENA i3 Architecture • Carroll County, MD—NG911 deployment(part of NCR) Working Group • Frederick County. MD—NG911 deployment(part of NCR) Department of Homeland • Prince William County, VA—Call-handling procurement(part of NCR) Security NG911 • City of Aurora, CO—Call-handling procurement Interoperability Task • Harford County, MD—NG911 procurement and implementation support(part of NCR) Force • Macomb County and Oakland County, MI—Call-handling procurements • Cuyahoga County, OH—NG911 and call-handling assessment • Santa Barbara County, CA—Call-handling deployment support • • Managed infrastructure implementation projects in support of NG911, including, i3 functional element testing, i3 OSP call delivery testing, and call-flow verification testing • Managed go-live readiness acceptance testing of the AT&T NG911 ESlnet, and managed CHE interoperability testing • Forecasted, planned and managed PSAP deployments and maintenance projects for NG911 PSAPs, (connectivity, installs, provisioning, consulting, testing, and cutover) • Authored several knowledge-based documents concerning the transition of legacy PSAPs to NG911, including topics such as GIS, policy routing, automatic location identification (ALI)migration, and PSAP cutover test plans • • Member of the NG911 Interoperability Task Force sponsored by the US DHS ,.�• M MissionCriticalPartners 11 16J 2 Dave Boyce Vice President of Emerging Services Development, Mission Critical Partners Dave serves as MCP's leader of technical solutions, and his mission is to solve complex NG911, network, voice and data challenges with client-centric, technology-oriented ideas. He has served more than 35 years in the telecommunications industry. His passion is developing and implementing integrated technology solutions for public safety communications complex tt issues. Being very knowledgeable in the varying vendor approaches for networking, routing, customer premises equipment(CPE)and integration, Dave's primary strength is solving client — challenges within their operating environment's parameters. Areas of specialization include: • Designing/installing statewide 911 ESlnets and next-generation selective router solutions, countywide 911 networks, automatic number identification/automatic location identification (ANI/ALI)controllers, ALI systems and network and CPE procurement and deployment solutions; network engineering, project management, data transmission, central office Industry Experience switching, regulatory tariffs and budgeting 51 years Representative Experience Education B.A., Undergraduate • Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency Chemical Studies, Gannon Stockpile Emergency Preparedness Program—Alabama and Kentucky University, PA - Technical consulting for emergency communications, warning and alert systems Associations Staleikegional Experience National Emergency • Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency—NG911 and EOC design and support Number Association programming (NENA) • Montana-911 network, selective routing, ALI, PSAP CPE and performance management of statewide RFP development Awards • Indiana—Wireless direct RFP, deployment planning and project oversight The State of Ohio, GTE • Arizona—Design and implementation support for Microwave network time-division "Presidential Leadership" multiplexing (TDM)to IP conversion award for excellent • Southwestern Pennsylvania Regional Task Force(PA Region 13) ESlnet project management - Avaya enterprise voice over IP network implementation and maintenance work technical support/provisioned new services on Alcatel-Lucent routers for the 2022 Integrated Justice Western Pennsylvania County Regional ESlnet(WestCORE) Information Systems - WestCORE 911, Polycom video conferencing/regional Internet access (IJIS)Institute"Thomas J. • WestCORE 911 Regional Motorola Vesta Network—Collaboration with Motorola O'Reilly" Innovation engineers to develop regional IP address schema Award C'itv'C'nunty Fxperienr' Award for Project • Philadelphia, PA—Dark Fiber ESlnet replacement project Management of the first • Warren County, OH—Regional network assessment and design enhancements NG911 i3 and ESlnet • Rutherford County Emergency Communication District, TN—Regional ESlnet deployment in Prince • Lubbock Emergency Communication District, TX—Procurement of IP-enabled network George's County, MD services for 911 emergency network Solacom IPSR voice broadcast solution • Collier County, FL—Project management support for the transition of Motorola Radio Frequency Identification(RFID)to Vesta call-handling equipment(CHE) • Motorola-Prince George's County, MD—NG911 i3 design, procurement and project management support • • Allegheny County, PA—Vesta CHE design, procurement and project management support • MissionCriticalPartners 12 16J 2 Phil Rizzo Field Engineer-Telecom, Mission Critical Partners Phil has years of experience as an effective leader in the technical and operational sides of the telecommunications industry. His expertise is bringing together cross-functional teams to develop processes and procedures. Phil specializes in providing technical support for phone . system cutovers and assisting with customer premises equipment(CPE)installation and • maintenance, RFP development, PSAP consolidation and NG911 equipment selection. Representative Experience 1 e(teral/Regional ExpuHu!'.._ • U.S. Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency 7:111( (DHS/FEMA), Chemical Stockpile Emergency Preparedness Program (CSEPP)— - Technical support for RFP development and cutover Industry Experience - Rockcastle County, KY—Avaya phone system and Solacom 911 CPE remote installation oversight 42 years - Powell County, KY—NEC phone system and VESTA 911 CPE remote Education installation oversight - Clark County, KY—Avaya phone system Electronic Institutes, PA -- Madison County. KY—Solacom 911 CPE to replace the current Pallas 911 Certifications system and Avaya CM Enterprise IP phone system to replace the Norte' Business Communication Manager(BCM) Associate Technical Pueblo County, CO—VESTA 911 CPE hardware refresh Degree from Verizon • Southwest Pennsylvania Emergency Response Group(Region 13)—Technical support Lucent Technologies— for the Pittsburgh area that included 14 PSAPs on a shared VESTA system which totaled Systimax Structured 205 VESTA positions including hardware refresh and installation of redundant Service Connectivity Aggregation Routers(SARs)on the existing ESlnet #PA99071410 • Northern Eastern Pennsylvania Emergency Response Group(Northern Tier)—Technical support for the Erie area that included 10 PSAPs on a shared VESTA system which FCC First Class Operator totaled 66 VESTA positions License P1-4-4769 • Southwest Pennsylvania Emergency Response Group(Region 13)—Technical support Criminal Justice for the move to Comtech NG911 that included 14 PSAPs Information Services • South Central Mountain Region, PA—Establishment of a fiber ESlnet between Bedford, (CJIS)System Security Fulton, Huntingdon and Centre counties into the Region 13 counties and Awareness Training • Brazos Valley Council of Governments(BVCOG), TX—IP-enabled network vendor Level 4 selection Associations • North Central Texas Emergency Communications District(NCT9-1-1)—Installation of 43 Positron Vipers in a host/remote relationship National Emergency Number Association City/t uunty t A//tr;ltt r (NENA) • Philadelphia, PA—Cutover of new VESTA 911 solution with 120 VESTA positions • Gahanna, OH—Cutover of a new Solacom 911 solution with 15 positions with a local map • Cumberland County, PA—Airbus Sentinel CM NG911 installation and cutover • Rutherford County, TN—Establishment of a fiber network connecting PSAPs to ESlnet • Myrtle Beach, SC—RFP development and cutover of Solacom Solution 40 positions • Boone County, MO—Technical support for the cutover of a Viper solution that supports 25 call-taker positions • Prince George County, MD-76-position Airbus VESTA CS cutover • Lexington/Fayette County, KY—Enterprise Avaya CM 7 installation cutover support for 911, 311 and EOC operations • MissionCriticalPartners 13 16J Experience 16J 2 Representative Project Experience MCP's proven record of success with similar projects is detailed on the following pages. The table below lists clients and descriptions of MCP's CHE projects. Client ( Description Armstrong County, PA CHE and Network Services Beaver County, PA CHE Consulting Services Berks County, PA Call-Handling Assessment Butler County, PA CHE Consulting Services Cambria County, PA CHE Solution Center for Organ Recovery, PA CHE Analysis Centre County, PA 911 and CHE Assessment Chester County, PA Call-Handling Assessment Coweta County, GA CHE Assessment Fayette County, PA CHE Solution Greene County, PA CHE and Network Solutions Horry County, SC CHE Assessment, Procurement and Implementation Indiana County, PA CHE Solution and Network Design Lawrence County, PA CHE Solution Leesburg, VA CHE Implementation Montgomery County, MD CHE Solution Montgomery County, PA Call Handling Assessment Northern Virginia Emergency Response System (NVERS) Call Handling Study Potter Randall County, TX CHE Hardware Refresh Somerset County, PA CHE Solution • MissioncriticalPartners 15 16J 2 Client Description Tarrant County, TX CHE and Network Project, Equipment Preparation, and Implementation Venango County, PA CHE and Legacy 911 Integration Washington County, PA CHE/Fiber Network Transition • MissionCriticaPPartners 16 16J 2 Tarrant County 9-1-1 District, Texas 911 Customer Premises Equipment Procurement and WHEN SECONDS COUNT Consulting DIAL 911 Challenge: The Tarrant County 9-1-1 District(District)planned to migrate to ©C]© new 911 customer premises equipment(CPE)that would meet current needs, TARRANT COUNTY 9-1-1 DISTRICT support the migration to next generation network methodologies and leverage state-of-the-art technology to achieve cost-effective deployment, maximum sustainability and improved functionality for each PSAP in the District. To Project Length: 7.5 Years accomplish this,the District needed a qualified firm to oversee the Project Dates: June 2012 to qualifications, acquisition and contract negotiations of a vendor that will January 2019 perform the service within budgetary timelines. Population: 1.7 million(2021) Solution: The District retained Mission Critical Partners to develop an RFP for the acquisition and contract negotiations for 911 CPE and services. MCP's Nearest MSA: Dallas-Fort Worth- support included the following: Arlington, TX • Provided technical assistance in developing and drafting an RFP for the Contact: procurement of an optimal NG911 system including all required Sherri Decker components Executive Director • Conducted"due diligence"—fact-finding through vendor meetings and 817.223.7745 data gathering and assisted in developing a conceptual solution design to sdecker(SYtc911.orq support the procurement requirements • Ensured specifications included all legally mandated scopes of service, such as provisions for special needs populations • Provided management support during the bid solicitation • Supported the District in contract negotiations, ensuring the proposed vendor solution met the technical requirements of the RFP and acted as a technical resource to the District Key Result: MCP utilized the information gathered during due diligence to define all technical(CPE and network)requirements and develop a conceptual solution design to support the requirements for procurement. The Tarrant County 9-1-1 District issued an RFP to solicit bids for the 911 CPE and services in September 2012. MCP worked closely with the District to review the bid responses and to select a qualified vendor. Again,working closely with the District, MCP developed and executed tests on the vendor's solution,which ultimately failed to meet performance requirements. MCP assisted the District with contract and performance modifications to allow the vendor to substitute an equivalent solution and conducted similar tests on the vendor's replacement solution. MCP provided oversight and implementation support to the District to bring the project to a successful conclusion. • MissienCriticalPartners 17 16J 2 Lawrence County, Pennsylvania p`�'$RENCF Fiber Expansion j1 Background: Lawrence County(County), acting on behalf of the Pennsylvania Region 13(Southwest)Task Force(Region 13)and Mercer, * �a Fayette and Washington counties, sought professional consulting support to b/ �� provide for the procurement, through a competitive RFP process, for dark fiber Hbq'1�5 enhancements between Lawrence and Mercer counties as well as between Fayette and Washington counties. Project Length: <2 Years With the availability of fiber increased in the region,the counties were seeing Project Dates: December 2018 to opportunities to enhance their capabilities in diversity, capacity, speed and July 2020 reliability by replacing the microwave links installed in the earlier phases of the ESlnet. Solutions Provided: Challenge: The network was responsible for providing the delivery, Fiber Expansion processing and dispatch of 911 calls through the region's shared call- Competitive RFP Development handling, CAD and radio systems. When the Region 13 ESlnet was constructed, it was done using a hybrid of fiber and microwave. Over time,the Oversight of Service Design amount of shared systems, bandwidth needs and necessity of geodiversity of Installation, Configuration and the systems all increased. Migration Support Solution: Mission Critical Partners was selected to support this critical project Population: 86,070(2020) for the County. MCP's support included: Nearest MSA: Pittsburgh, PA • Establishing formal authorization • Developing a competitive RFP for dark and lit broadband services Contact: • Providing individual contract support per county Lawrence County Department • Overseeing dark fiber/IP schema/Layer 2, virtual private LAN service of Public Safety (VPLS)service design 724.202.7101 • Installing fiber optic hardware Icdns@leoc.net • Configuring network IP routes and migration of services Chad Strobel Director of Public Safety Key Result:With MCP's support, the County issued an RFP that was used to 724.202.7102 solicit and support the competitive procurement of dark fiber. This RFP cstrobel(a�leoc.net resulted in enhancements that improved the reliability and diversity of the existing ESlnet that is serving shared CAD, call-handling equipment(CHE), GIS and radio services.Additionally, it eliminated a point of failure in microwave hops and provided each county with geo-redundant fiber routes and the necessary bandwidth to meet county needs. • MissionCriticalPartners 18 16J 2 Greene County, Pennsylvania 11Ec'oG Fiber Expansion Q �� Background: Greene County(County), acting on behalf of the Pennsylvania Region 13(Southwest)Task Force(Region 13)was planning for the ' enhancement of an existing dark fiber network. The network currently provides for the delivery, processing and dispatch of 911 calls through the region's shared call-handling, CAD and radio systems. The availability of fiber has increased in the region, and the counties are Project Length: Ongoing seeing opportunities to enhance their capabilities in diversity, capacity, speed Project Dates: February 2022 to and reliability by replacing the microwave links installed in the earlier phases Present of the ESlnet. The proposed expansion will provide the competitive procurement for diverse fiber into Greene County's PSAPs. Solutions Provided: Challenge:When the Region 13 ESlnet was constructed, it was done using a Fiber Expansion hybrid of fiber and microwave. Over time,the number of shared systems, Competitive RFP Development, bandwidth needs and necessity of geodiversity of the systems have all Evaluation and Procurement increased. Support Solution: Mission Critical Partners was selected by the County to support this Oversight of Service Design critical engagement. MCP's services include: Installation, Configuration and • Establishment of formal authorization Migration Support • Development of a competitive RFP • Individual contract support for each county Population: 35,954(2020) • RFP release,evaluation and procurement support Nearest MSA: Pittsburgh, PA • Oversight of dark fiber/IP schema/Layer 2, virtual private LAN service Contact: (VPLS)service design • Installation of fiber-optic hardware Richard Policz • Configuration of network IP routes and migration of services Director 724.852.2911 Key Result:This project will provide for the procurement,through a rpolicz©co.greene.pa.us competitive RFP process, for dark fiber enhancements to Greene County as well as between Fayette and Washington counties. This enhancement will initially improve the reliability and diversity of the existing ESlnet.At the end of 2022,the County issued a final RFP,with support from MCP, that will help procure the necessary support for the extension of the Region 13 ESlnet from the Greene County PSAP to the Fayette County PSAP.This route will replace an existing microwave route and is required to be designed to not share any common point of potential failure with the existing DQE Communications fiber that currently supports both the Greene County and Fayette County PSAPs. • MissionCriticalPartners 19 16J 2 Pricing 16J 2 Professional services outlined in the scope of work will be provided for a total fee of$69,104. The fee is inclusive of labor and expenses. Mission Critical Partners proposes to deliver services on a per-hour basis based on Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) Purchase Contract#HP08-21, with expenses defined at actual cost. At the close of each month, MCP shall submit a properly executed invoice showing services rendered for that month. Each statement shall include labor and expenses for authorized activities based on the approved scope of work. Reimbursable expenses on this project will be invoiced at the cost incurred. Invoices shall be reviewed and paid within 30 days of receipt. Any additional services will be performed at MCP's then-current fee schedule. Prior to initiating any such additional work, MCP would require a formal letter of authorization from the Collier County Sheriffs Office. Based on the current MCP understanding of what is to be accomplished, the pricing identified represents an estimate of the work anticipated to achieve project success. MCP's priority is for this project to be successful for the Collier County Sheriff's Office. Assumptions • To be more responsive to CCSO's needs, MCP respectfully reserves the right to move professional fees and expenses between tasks, as needed, to complete the SOW, as long as the total amount billed to the Collier County Sheriff's Office does not exceed the contract amount. * Pricing for this SOW does not include on-site support for implementation or acceptance testing. All work for these tasks will be performed remotely. M MissionCriticalPartners 21 16J 2 FLORIDA 911 REGION 6 Next Generation 9-1-1 PROJECT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO TO ADD MANATEE COUNTY AND SARASOTA COUNTY AS PARTIES TO THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) REGARDING A JOINT REGIONAL NEXT GENERATION 911 ROUTING PROJECT BETWEEN CHARLOTTE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, DESOTO COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, GLADES COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, HARDEE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, HENDRY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, HIGHLANDS COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, LEE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,OKEECHOBEE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND ST. LUCIE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. WHEREAS, this addendum number two to the memorandum of understanding ("Addendum") is made and entered into by and between Charlotte County Board Of County Commissioners (hereinafter, Charlotte BOCC), Collier County Board Of County Commissioners (hereinafter, Collier BOCC), Desoto County Board Of County Commissioners (hereinafter, Desoto BOCC) Glades County Board Of County Commissioners (hereinafter, Glades BOCC), Hardee County Board Of County Commissioners (hereinafter, Hardee BOCC), Hendry County Board Of County Commissioners(hereinafter,Hendry BOCC),Highlands County Board Of County Commissioners (hereinafter, Highlands BOCC), Lee County Board Of County Commissioners (hereinafter, Lee BOCC), Manatee County Board of County Commissioners(hereinafter, Manatee BOCC), Martin County Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter, Martin BOCC), Monroe County Board Of County Commissioners (hereinafter, Monroe BOCC), Okeechobee Board Of County Commissioners (hereinafter, Okeechobee BOCC), Sarasota Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter, Sarasota BOCC) and St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners(hereinafter, St. Lucie BOCC) who desire to enter this addendum number two to Memorandum of Understanding regarding the parties Joint Regional Next Generation 911 (NG911) Systems and Services Project("Project"). WHEREAS the Boards of County Commissioners listed in this agreement will be referred to collectively as the "Parties" and individually referred to as a "Party" or" BOCC." WHEREAS the Parties are authorized by 163.01, Florida Statutes, to enter into interlocal agreements to cooperatively and efficiently use their powers to provide public services that will advance the general health, safety and welfare of their respective citizens. 1 16J 2 FLORIDA 911 REGION 6 Next Generation 9-1-1 PROJECT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WHEREAS the Parties entered into a Memorandum of Understanding regarding the parties Joint Regional Next Generation 911 (NG91 1) Systems and Services Project("MOU") in 2022. WHEREAS,the Parties,pursuant to MOU paragraph VII wish to add Manatee BOCC and Sarasota BOCC to the list of participating Boards of County Commissioners. WHEREAS the Parties do not intend to disturb or amend any provision of the MOU as adopted by the Parties. I. ADDENDUM The Parties hereby add Manatee BOCC and Sarasota BOCC as Parties to the MOU on the date when the Manatee BOCC and Sarasota BOCC notify the Parties that their respective Boards have accepted and acknowledged the MOU's terms and conditions. II. MOU PROVISIONS TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED OR FURTHER AMENDED The sole purpose of this addendum is to add Manatee BOCC and Sarasota BOCC as Parties to the MOU.All other provisions of the MOU remain undisturbed and the Parties do not intend to amend such provisions further. III. CONFLICT If any provision of this addendum is deemed by a court of competent jurisdiction to conflict with a provision of the MOU, the Parties intend for the MOU to govern. All parties agree that they will comply with the grant's terms. After the grant project period has ended, any party may terminate their participation in this MOU upon thirty (30)days'written notice to all other parties. Signatures continue on next pages 2 16J 2 FLORIDA 911 REGION 6 Next Generation 9-1-1 PROJECT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 1) Charlotte County Board of County Commissioners (or designee)--required This MOU is passed,duly adopted and signed on this day of , . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Joseph M.Tiseo, Chairman ATTEST: Roger D. Eaton, Clerk of Circuit Court and Ex-Officio Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Janette S.Knowlton,County Attorney 3 16J 2 FLORIDA 911 REGION 6 Next Generation 9-1-1 PROJECT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 2) Collier County Board of County Commissioners (or designee)—required fL j' This MOU is passed, duly adopted and signed on this IA day of 3,/h e , . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER C UNTY, FLORIDA B 3• - r CLERIC -— Burt L. Saunders, Chairman ATTEST: CRYS AL'K:`KINZEL, BY� .+a Deputy Ciefk... Mast as to ChairmaniVy signature only ' Approve, as to f I and legal sufficiency: AAtiog L ,..... Jeffrey X ,atz ow,County Attorney 4 16J 2 FLORIDA 911 REGION 6 Next Generation 9-1-1 PROJECT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 3) Desoto County Board of County Commissioners(or designee) --required This MOU is passed. duly adopted and signed on this day of , . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESOTO COUNTY,FLORIDA By: Elton Langford, Chairman ATTEST: Mandy Hines, County Administrator Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Donald D. Conn, County Attorney 5 16J 2 FLORIDA 911 REGION 6 Next Generation 9-1-1 PROJECT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 4) Glades County Board of County Commissioners (or designee) --required Tim Stanley-Chairman PO Box 1527 500 Ave J Moore Haven, FL 33471 Signature/Date Print Name/Title 6 16J 2 FLORIDA 911 REGION 6 Next Generation 9-1-1 PROJECT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 5) Hardee County Board of County Commissioners(or designee) --required Russell Melendy-Chairman 412 W Orange St, Room 103 Wauchula, FL, 33873 Signature/Date Print Name/Title 7 16J 2 FLORIDA 911 REGION 6 Next Generation 9-1-1 PROJECT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 6) Hendry County Board of County Commissioners (or designee) --required C/O Jennifer Davis, County Administrator PO Box 1760 LaBelle, Florida 33975 Signature/Date Print Name/Title 8 16J 2 FLORIDA 911 REGION 6 Next Generation 9-1-1 PROJECT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 7) Highlands County Board of County Commissioners(or designee) --required C/O County Administrator 600 S Commerce Ave Sebring, FL 33870 Signature/Date Print Name/Title 9 16J 2 FLORIDA 911 REGION 6 Next Generation 9-1-1 PROJECT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 8) Lee County Board of Count'Commissioners(or designee) --required C/O County Manager PO Box 398 Fort Myers, FL 33902 With a copy to: Lee County Attn: 911 Program Manager PO Box 398 Fort Myers, FL 33902 Signature/Date Print Name/Title 10 16J 2 FLORIDA 911 REGION 6 Next Generation 9-1-1 PROJECT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 9) Monroe County Board of County Commissioners (or designee) --required Monroe County Board of County Commissioners 1100 Simonton Street Key West, FL 33040 With a copy to: Monroe County Sheriffs Office Rick Ramsay Sheriff 5525 College Road Key West, FL 33040 Signature/Date Print Name/Title 11 16J 2 FLORIDA 911 REGION 6 Next Generation 9-1-1 PROJECT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 10) Okeechobee County Board of County Commissioners(or designee)—required C/O Deborah Manzo, County Administrator 304 NW 2nd Street Okeechobee, FL 34972 Signature/Date Print Name/Title 12 16J 2 FLORIDA 911 REGION 6 Next Generation 9-1-1 PROJECT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 11)Martin County Board of County Commissioners (or designee)—required The authorized signatory(ies)below acknowledges and agree on behalf of the Martin County Board of County Commissions to be bound to the MOU's terms and conditions. Notices required to be given under this MOU for the Martin County Board of County Commissioners shall be delivered by email or registered or certified mail to: C/O Signature/Date Print Name/Title 13 16J 2 FLORIDA 911 REGION 6 Next Generation 9-1-1 PROJECT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 12) St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners (or designee)—required The authorized signatory(ies)below acknowledges and agree on behalf of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissions to be bound to the MOU's terms and conditions. Notices required to be given under this MOU for the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners shall be delivered by email or registered or certified mail to: C/O Signature/Date Print Name/Title 14 1 '6 J 2 FLORIDA 911 REGION 6 Next Generation 9-1-1 PROJECT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 13) Manatee County Board of County Commissioners (or designee)—required The authorized signatory(ies)below acknowledges and agree on behalf of the Manatee County Board of County Commissions to be bound to the MOU's terms and conditions. Notices required to be given under this MOU for the Manatee County Board of County Commissioners shall be delivered by email or registered or certified mail to: C/O Signature/Date Print Name/Title 15 1 fLJ 2 FLORIDA 911 REGION 6 Next Generation 9-1-1 PROJECT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 14)Sarasota County Board of County Commissioners (or designee)—required The authorized signatory(ies)below acknowledges and agree on behalf of the Sarasota County Board of County Commissions to be bound to the MOU's terms and conditions. Notices required to be given under this MOU for the Sarasota County Board of County Commissioners shall be delivered by email or registered or certified mail to: C/O Signature/Date Print Name/Title 16