The URL can be used to link to this page

HEX Agenda 06/12/2025COLLIER COUNTY Hearing Examiner AGENDA Growth Management Department Conference Rooms 609/610 2800 Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 June 12, 2025 1:00 PM Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP Hearing Examiner Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes unless otherwise waived by the Hearing Examiner. Persons Wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the hearing report packets must have that material submitted to County staff at Ailyn.Padron&CollierCounVFL.gov 10 days prior to the Hearing. All materials used during presentation at the hearing will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner are final unless appealed to the Board of County Commissioners. Hearing Procedures will provide for presentation by the Applicant, presentation by staff, public comment and applicant rebuttal. The Hearing Examiner will render a decision within 30 days. Persons wishing to receive a copy of the decision by mail may supply County staff with their name, address, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope for that purpose_ Persons wishing to receive an electronic copy of the decision may supply their email address. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Review of Agenda 3. Advertised Public Hearing 3.A. PETITION NO. PL20240014059 VA — 547 106th Ave North - Request for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.02.C.2.b to increase the maximum allowed RMF-6 zoned fence height from 6 feet to 8 feet on the north, west, and east property lines on approximately �0.23 acres located at 547 106th Ave North, also known as west '/z of Lot 12 and all of Lot 13, Block 76 of the Naples Park Unit 6 subdivision in Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Sean Sarnmon, Planner III] Commissioner District 2 (2o25-1796) 3.B. PETITION NO. CU-PL20230006785 — intersection of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Crews Road - One Life Church Naples, Inc., pursuant to Sections 2.03.01.B.1.c.1 and 2.03.02.B.1.c.1. of the Collier County Land Development Code, requests a Conditional Use to allow a f25,000 square foot, 400 seat church on lands zoned Estates (E) and Residential Multi- Family-6 (RMF-6(3)). The subject 14.88f acre property is in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Crews Road in Sections 8 and 17, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Planner III] Commission District 1 (2025-1800) 3.C. PETITION NO. PL20240011350 BD - 388 Calusa Drive - Request for a 72-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow construction of a boat docking facility protruding a total of 92 feet into a waterway that is 2,766f feet wide. The subject property is located at 388 Calusa Drive, approximately 90 feet west of Mangrove Lane in. Chokoloskee, in Section 36, Township 53 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commissioner District 5 ow5-1964} 3.1). PETITION NO. PL20240011254 VA - 3620 White Boulevard - Request for an after -the -fact variance from Land Development Code (LDC) Section 2.03.01.B.2.d, for a 75-foot wide nonconforming lot of record in the Estate (E) Zoning District, to reduce the required eastern side yard from 7.5 feet to 4.2 feet to allow for the continued existence of a pool equipment shed and to allow a further reduction of said side yard to 2.95 feet to accommodate the structure's 1.25-foot roof overhang. The subject property is located at 3620 White Boulevard and further described as the West 150 feet of Tract 84, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 27, in Section 14, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commissioner District 5 po2s-1967) 4. New Business 5. Old Business 6. Public Comments 7. Adjourn COLLIER COUNTY Hearing Examiner AGENDA Growth Management Department Conference Rooms 609/610 2800 Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 June 12, 2025 1:00 PM Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP Hearing Examiner Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes unless otherwise waived by the Hearing Examiner. Persons Wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the hearing report packets must have that material submitted to County staff at Ailyn.PadrongCollierCou�FL.gov 10 days prior to the Hearing. All materials used during presentation at the hearing will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner are final unless appealed to the Board of County Commissioners. Hearing Procedures will provide for presentation by the Applicant, presentation by staff, public comment and applicant rebuttal. The Hearing Examiner will render a decision within 30 days. Persons wishing to receive a copy of the decision by mail may supply County staff with their name, address, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope for that purpose. Persons wishing to receive an electronic copy of the decision may supply their email address. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Review of Agenda 3. Advertised Public Hearing 3.A. PETITION NO. PL20240014059 VA — 547 106th Ave North - Request for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.02.C.2.b to increase the maximum allowed RMF-6 zoned fence height from 6 feet to 8 feet on the north, west, and east property lines on approximately ±0.23 acres located at 547 106th Ave North, also known as west 1/2 of Lot 12 and all of Lot 13, Block 76 of the Naples Park Unit 6 subdivision in Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Sean Sammon, Planner III] Commissioner District 2 (2025-1796) 3.B. PETITION NO. CU-PL20230006785 — intersection of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Crews Road - One Life Church Naples, Inc., pursuant to Sections 2.03.0l.B.l.c.1 and 2.03.02.B.1.c.1. of the Collier County Land Development Code, requests a Conditional Use to Page 1 of 403 allow a ±25,000 square foot, 400 seat church on lands zoned Estates (E) and Residential Multi- Family-6 (RMF-6(3)). The subject 14.88± acre property is in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Crews Road in Sections 8 and 17, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Planner III] Commission District 1 (2025-1800) 3.C. PETITION NO. PL20240011350 BD - 388 Calusa Drive - Request for a 72-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow construction of a boat docking facility protruding a total of 92 feet into a waterway that is 2,766� feet wide. The subject property is located at 388 Calusa Drive, approximately 90 feet west of Mangrove Lane in Chokoloskee, in Section 36, Township 53 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commissioner District 5 (2025-1964) 3.1). PETITION NO. PL20240011254 VA - 3620 White Boulevard - Request for an after -the -fact variance from Land Development Code (LDC) Section 2.03.01.13.2.d, for a 75-foot wide nonconforming lot of record in the Estate (E) Zoning District, to reduce the required eastern side yard from 7.5 feet to 4.2 feet to allow for the continued existence of a pool equipment shed and to allow a further reduction of said side yard to 2.95 feet to accommodate the structure's 1.25-foot roof overhang. The subject property is located at 3620 White Boulevard and further described as the West 150 feet of Tract 84, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 27, in Section 14, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commissioner District 5 (2025-1967) 4. New Business 5. Old Business 6. Public Comments 7. Adjourn Page 2 of 403 6/12/2025 Item # 3.A ID# 2025-1796 PETITION NO. PL20240014059 VA — 547 106th Ave North - Request for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.02.C.2.b to increase the maximum allowed RMF-6 zoned fence height from 6 feet to 8 feet on the north, west, and east property lines on approximately t0.23 acres located at 547 106th Ave North, also known as west'/2 of Lot 12 and all of Lot 13, Block 76 of the Naples Park Unit 6 subdivision in Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Sean Sammon, Planner III] Commissioner District 2 ATTACHMENTS: PL20240014059 - Staff Report - 547 106th Ave N (VA) Attachment A - Backup Package Attachment B - Conceptual Site Plan Attachment C - Legal Ad and HEX Sign Posting Attachment D - Variance Letters of Support Page 3 of 403 id) Collier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JUNE 12, 2025 SUBJECT: PETITION VA-PL20240014059 - 547 106TH AVE N PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Applicant/Owner: Thomas Regner, Trustee Thomas Regner Living Trust 553 106'h Ave N Naples, FL 34108 REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) consider a request for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.02.C.2.b to increase the maximum allowed RMF-6 zoned fence height from 6 feet to 8 feet on the north, west, and east property lines. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is ±0.23 acres located at 547 106th Ave North, also known as west'/2 of Lot 12 and all of Lot 13, Block 76 of the Naples Park Unit 6 subdivision in Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on page 2). VA-PL20240014059 — 547 106th Ave N Page 1 of 7 May 20, 2025 Page 4 of 403 SITE LOCATION MAP � � CD C 2 w � � \ m � � 2 L co ------------ \ co LO m \ / % co � cn c LO § � 2 LO ■ Q 0 � C m Z f Q § � u C6 j . _ k $ PC < k « < ¢ k © ��0� • A ' u. Q e � � « c 2� -- G) Ul) C:) � � C) � � C14 -i CL E 0 .0 E 2 z E 0 � 0 CL VAPU020014059-57106 Ave Page 297 May 2¢2o5 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property is a ±0.23-acre legal conforming lot located in the Residential Multi-Family- 6 (RMF-6) zoning district, subject to the design standards located in the Land Development Code (LDC) Section4.02.0l.A. for principal structures and the LDC Sect ion 5.03.02.C.2.b. for non - waterfront interior lots at 1 acre or less. The applicant requests to increase the maximum allowed RMF-6 zoned fence height from 6 feet to 8 feet on the north, west, and east property lines. The subject property has been developed, and the current property owner purchased the property on February 22, 2024. The subject property is located approximately 600 feet west of the intersection of 6th Street and 106th Ave N at 547 106th Ave N, Naples, FL, 34108, and within the Urban Residential Subdistrict as part of the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of Collier County. (See Attachment B, Conceptual Site Plan). The subject property has been developed since 1968, as originally a duplex under permit number 67-1250. The current owner purchased the property in 2024 and intended to demolish the duplex to construct a new single-family residence. The demolition permit was finalized and completed under permit number PRDM20240522584. The new single-family residence is under permit number PRFH2O240623403, with Inspections Commenced. There is an accessory pool under permit number PRSPL20240729044, with Inspections Commenced. Lastly, the fence, which is being requested in this Variance petition, is under the permit number PRFW20240729045. Prior to the demolition of the duplex in 2024, the slab was at 10.8 feet, approximately 5 inches above the center of the road, measured at 10.4 feet. The current code now requires a new home slab to be a minimum of 18 inches above the crest of the road, which now equates to approximately 12 feet. The new slab for the new residence on the subject property has an approximate elevation of 12.4 feet. This is above the required elevation and matches the adjacent property's elevation. The requested fence to be installed requires a block or wood retaining wall in the public utility easement (PUE) in the rear. The fence along the side property lines is required to have a maximum height of 6 feet above the original grade. Due to fill necessary for the subject property to meet the elevation requirements, the fence will be a total of 8 feet high when measured from the original grade, requiring the need of a 2-foot height variance. The hardship extends beyond the dimensions of the fence when considering the owner's privacy needs for the subject property in comparison with those of the adjacent properties. The property to the east was built in 2019, and installed a 6-foot fence on a 2-foot wall along the entire adjacent side property line. The applicant's request along the east side property line will be a 6-foot fence on backfill up to the current wall, which will be 8 feet above the original grade. The adjacent property to the west is currently under construction for a new residence and is expected to be complete in the spring of 2025 with a raised elevation. The owner/applicant of the subject property requests to build a 6-foot fence along this west side property line on either a 2-foot retaining wall or on the elevated ground, which will be determined by the neighbor's decision to proceed. The adjacent property to the north, along the rear property line, is cleared and expected to be under construction for a new residence. The owner applicant requests to build a 6-foot fence on a 2-foot retaining wall, thereby maintaining an overall fence height of 8 feet along the east, west, and north property lines. The hardship and necessity of the fence variance request are to maintain and protect the privacy of the owner and applicant, as well as their family. Without the variance, the code VA-PL20240014059 — 547 1061h Ave N Page 3 of 7 May 20, 2025 Page 6 of 403 would only allow the owner and applicant to build a fence at a maximum height of 3.5 feet over the elevated slab, which would deprive the homeowner of any possible privacy. Staff recognizes the need for a variance in the fence height on the subject property. Further staff analysis is provided in response to the variance criteria and is included in the Zoning Division Analysis section below. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Vacant single-family residential with a zoning designation of Residential Multi- Family-6 (RMF-6) zoning district. East: Developed single-family residential with a zoning designation of Residential Multi-Family-6 (RMF-6) zoning district. South: 106th Ave N and then developed single-family residential with a zoning designation of Residential Multi-Family-6 (RMF-6) zoning district. West: Developed single-family residential with a zoning designation of Residential Multi-Family-6 (RMF-6) zoning district. Aerial Map — Collier County Property Appraiser VA-PL20240014059 — 547 106th Ave N Page 4 of 7 May 20, 2025 Page 7 of 403 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is located in the Residential Multi-Family-6 (RMF-6) Zoning District and the Urban Residential Subdistrict designated area as identified in the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual variance requests but deals with the larger issue of the actual use. As previously stated, the subject petition seeks a variance for a single- family residential dwelling to increase the maximum allowed RMF-6 zoned fence height from 6 feet to 8 feet on the north, west, and east property lines, which is an authorized use in this land use designation. This land use category is designed to accommodate residential uses, including single- family homes. The single-family residential use and fence is consistent with the Future Land Use Map of the GMP. ZONING DIVISION ANALYSIS: The decision to grant a variance is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.04.03. Staff have analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offer the following responses: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing that are peculiar to the location, size, and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved? Yes, the elevation of the property has been raised to comply with the current flood elevation requirements. The house previously on the property, built in 1968, was on a slab with an elevation of 10.8 feet. Current code requires a minimum slab elevation of approximately 12 feet, which meets the 18 inches above the crest of the road. The new slab is at an elevation of approximately 12.4 feet, slightly above the required elevation. Due to the increase in elevation, a fence allowed by current code with a maximum of 6 feet above original grade, is inadequate for allowing appropriate privacy for the applicant and the neighboring residents. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances that do not result from the action of the applicant, such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? Yes, at the time of the purchase in February 2024, the elevation of the land was inadequate to meet current flood elevation requirements for the slab of the new house. This required significant fill to be added to the property. The land elevation at the time of purchase was not a result of any action taken by the applicant. C. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? Yes, a literal interpretation of the LDC creates a hardship for the applicant. According to the LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2.b., the maximum fence height in the side and rear yard for the subject property interior lot in the RMF-6 zoning district is 6 feet. Due to the required elevation of the new house, this fence height is insufficient to provide the necessary privacy VA-PL20240014059 — 547 106th Ave N Page 5 of 7 May 20, 2025 Page 8 of 403 to the subject property as well as the neighboring properties. d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure and which promotes standards of health, safety, and welfare? Yes, if granted, the variance will be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure and which promotes standards of health, safety, or welfare. This variance request is minimum due to the fence maintaining a height of 6 feet as permitted by the code, however, it will be installed on 2 feet retaining wall along the north, east, and west property lines. e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? No, granting the variance will not allow any special privileges, as a fence and retaining wall are permitted within the RMF-6 zoning district, similar to the adjacent property to the east at 554 106th Ave N. f. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code and not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Yes, granting the variance will be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code. It will not be injurious to the neighborhood or be otherwise detrimental to public welfare. The fence variance will allow for privacy for the applicant's residence as well as the adjacent neighboring residences. Without the variance, this may negatively impact the neighborhood due to diminished privacy. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation, such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? No, there are no natural conditions that create a land hardship. However, the variance is requested due to the current code, which stipulates the elevation of the new slab on the property, the impacts of the increased elevation on the privacy of the applicant and neighboring properties, and the increased height of the slab of the adjacent property. h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Yes, granting the variance will be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: The EAC does not normally hear variance petitions. Since the subject variance does not impact any preserve area, the EAC did not hear this petition. VA-PL20240014059 — 547 106th Ave N Page 6 of 7 May 20, 2025 Page 9 of 403 RECOM NDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve variance petition PL20240014059, a request for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.02.C.2.b to increase the maximum allowed RMF-6 zoned fence height from 6 feet to 8 feet on the north, west, and east property lines, as depicted within Attachment B. AffnehmPntc- Attachment A: Backup Package Attachment B: Conceptual Site Plan Attachment C: Legal Ad and HEX Sign Posting Attachment D: Variance Letters of Support VA-PL20240014059 — 547 106th Ave N Page 7 of 7 May 20, 2025 Page 10 of 403 HEARING PACKAGE CHECKLIST Return ttiis form with printed matehals A. Backup provided by the County Planner The Planner is responsible for all required data included in the printed packets of information for the Hearing Examiner jHex] or the Willer County Planning Commission (CCPC). DO NOT ACCEPT DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. MAKE SURE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/ APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. PLEASE CONFIRM THE DOCUMENTS ARE IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED IN "BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT." Planner responsible for providing the County Attorney -drafted Ordinance for PUDs and placing in backup materials. AGENTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE PUD DOCUMENT — STAFF PROVIDES THIS TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WHEN THE ORDINANCE 15 DRAFTED FOR A PUD. THE FINAL PUD ORDINANCE/RESOLLMON IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT. (FOR HEX, THE REQUESTED LANGUAGE/ PROPOSED PLAN tS THE FIRST ITFM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT] B. Backup provided by Applicant: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED BELOW. DO NOT PROVIDE DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS_ PROVIDE ONLY T14E LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. IF TH E BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT IS IN DISARRAY -MEANING iT 15 NOT IN THE PROPER ORDER AND/OR THE APPLICANT PROVIDES MULTIPLE DU PLI CATE 5-TH E APPLICANT COULD LOSE ITS HEARING DATE. Application, to include but not lirniLed to the following`. {Narrative of request Property Information Property Ownership Disclosure Form Any other documents required by the specific petition type; such as a variance, a boat dock extension; PUCE amendrnent, rezone request, etc. Disclosure of Propeny Ownership Interest (if there Is additional documentation aside from disclosure form) Affidavit of Unified Control Affidav€t of RepresenLadon Drawin8s (may inc€ude Cross -Section (for BDEs generally), proposed Boat Docks) with Water depth, location maps etc.) NIM information (Sign in sheet, notes, mrnuti�s and transertpLfor summary) V Include 3 thumbnail drives of video and/or audio Traffir Impact Study (TIS) Fnvirunmental Data H€storiraIJArcheolog] caI Su rvey or Waiver 7 Utility Letter Deviation Justifications Reufsed S/D 8120153 11rovide vi AgentS G;\COL5 Planning Servrtm_S\G-irrerrtlZaningStaii lsdt miahcnV] bMpihorHcIRGukles Page 11 of 403 Boundary Survey _-- Dther doturnents, as needed, on a case -by -case bass such as relevant prior Ordinances, Conditional Uses, historical documents, any "private or legal" agreements affecting the PUD etc. SLibmerged Res uurce Surveys may be Ind uded here if required. CD with oMy one pdf fide for aII documents in the same order as the packets areput_to egg Cher. They must be in the same order. I understand that by submitting the above materials, It is the 2genl%/applicant's responslblIfty to ensure all materials are in the same order for all copies of backup materials to provide to the Hex/ CCPC and the Ca must cantaln the documents in ore pdf flle (not multiple files) in the Saar, order as the printed materials. It is the agent's responsibility to ensure no documentattan Is left Gaut_ Signature of Agent Ppr sentatixre pate It#aF+h• C.f J Printed Name of Signing Agent Representative RevIsedV18l2018 Provhde10Agerits 6,'CffSPbxingServkeslCuirc tr Mrdng5 Air0ftnKi0n\MbAklEsorHL4pGuides Page 12 of 403 Need Help? O per COWIty Growth Mariagerment Community Development Department GMCD Public portal Online Payment -Guide E-Permittirig Guides VARIANCE PETITION APPLICATION variance -from Setbacks Required fora Particular Zoning District LDC Section 9.04.40 & Code of Laws section 2-83 — 2-130 Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code PROJECT NAME; I APPLICANT CONTACT INFOR MAT11ON I Name of Property Owner(s): f a,.z 1, e1S7 Name of Applicant if different than owner: �4s ,rf a WSF Address., !yd l s V _City: ,L,�j State: ZIP: 3LII,9 Telephone: Cell: �- 6'76 7 Fax: E-Mail Address; 55oe- r S Name of Agent; Firm: Address: Telephone- E-MaiI Address: City: State: ZIP: Cell: Fax: $E AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBOVIST REGUTATION5, GU10E YOURSELF ACC OR DINGLYAND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCF WITH THESE REGULATIONS. FUM74001459 FENCE/ WAC E .160MAS REGNER MAR 24 2Ub 6 �;7 Variance ApplicYtion {VA) 3f27124 gage 1 of 6 p7annm$ and Zoning Division • 2800 North Hafsnshoe Drive - Nnples, FL 34304 - 239-252-24W v !'Wr4countvfi.r-ow Page 13 of 403 PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal deKription of the property covered by the application: (if SpaCe is inadequate, attach an separate page) Property 1.D. Nurn ber. t r 4VO&, - Section/Township/Range: � f 'C ,/f, Sr y f Subdivision: 11�00 r V.- rr Unit: _Lot: / a .Black: 71� r¢13 ?6 Metes & Pounds Description: Total Acreage: Address/ General Location of Subject Property: r- 06 J & ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Ewhi��Iff a t `Ail 7=!1 y, "W--%WfTrAF4-KW— �rffadff ME IN IJ Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property: Front: f.t. Corner Lot: ❑ Yes ® No f.t, Waterfront Lot. ❑ Yes ® No Rear: 10 ;�,r.{1L chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this itennF please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. Fr"240914959 FENCE/ WALL Variance Application (VA) V27124 Page 2 of 6 1 Page 14 of 403 Alta I ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition, Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can he found an the Board of County Commissioner's web s1e at http:U ww.coII fergov.netllridex.aspx?page-774- Name of Homeowner ASSMiation: M Mailing Address: Name flf Homeowner Association: pity: i5tate:�ZIP: Mailing Address: City, State: ZIP: rume of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: City:�State: ZIP: City: City: State; ZIP, Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP - NATURE OF PETI a tON 0n a separatc sheet, attached try the appiication, please provide the foliourino: 1, A detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25 ft. to 18 ft.; when property owner purchased property; when existing principal structure was bullt (include building permit nurnber(s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encreachrant carne to be; etc. 2_ For prcjects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling- 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.134.00, staff shall be guided In their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided In the deterrnination to approve ur deny a variance petition by the criteria (a-h) listed below. Please address the following criteria, aj Are there special conditions and circurnstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the [and, structure, or building involved- FL20 4001405e FrNCF/ VALL � Var}ance AppliUWon (VA) 3127124 J OGN dI S R L U N E R M A C 94 2025 Page 3 of 6 44 Page 15 of 403 b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or -create practical difficulties on the applicant, d) Will the variance, If granted, be the minimum valiance that will make possible the reasonable use of the I8nd, builtding or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. ej Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to Qther lands, buildings, or structures In the same zoning district, F) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this toning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the pubiic welfare, gj Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such a natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? 4_ Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ;7 No ifyes, please provide copies. P00246014059 FENCE I WALL' Variance Apprcation (VA) = 7124 Page 4 pF 6 Page 16 of 403 Pre -Application Meeting and Final SubmIttaI Requirement Checklist far: Variance Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code The fnllowing Submittal Requirement Checktiit is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at tune of application submittal. At time of Submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet_ Please provide the submittal items in the exact order tasted below with cover sheets attached to each sectioln. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR Ri5VIrW REQUIRED NCYT REQUIRED Completed Application (dawn load current farm from County websike) Pre -Application Meeting Notes Project Narrative Lgrnpl tedAdd es irtRChecklist Pre erty []isclosure_Form Conceptual Site Plan 2A" x 36" and one S A " x li" copy urvey ct property s awing the entroae mer_t measur rn et Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarliwd D�dsf i.egal(5} __ Location fnap Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser} with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLU CFCS Codes with I egend included on aerlal E Historical -Surveyor waiver request, if applicable Environmental Data Requirements or exemptlon justlflcatlon Once the first set of (eview comments are posted, provide the assigned planner with drat - Agent Letter and address of property own Us Electroniceapy of all documents a n J plans *PIease advi5e: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically In PDF former, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROaSS: pollowing tale completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall sub rnItall materials electronically to the designated project manager_ + Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required_ PL202 6014059 FENDE ! WA L l 1,9 ;� Variance Appiicatun (VA) 31-17P24 Page 5 0l6 Ar Page 17 of 403 Planners: andicate If the petition needs to be routed to the falfnwing reviewers. 0 Bayshore/GatewayTrianle Redevelopment- Executive Director ❑ Historical Review: [� City of Naples: RuWn Singer, Planning Director ❑ Immokaiee Water/Sewer District, Q Conservancy of SWFL. Nichol Johnson ❑ Parks and Recreatlon Director, aerna Edwards ❑ Emergency Management; Dam Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay I� Schaal Uistrlet (Residential Components)- Amy Lockheart '!o4'L'-/(a V Pre -Application Meeting: $500-00 34 Variance Petition: >< ttesidential- 52,000.00 0 Non-Residential-$5,000.00 0 5141 and Subsequent Revlew- 20% of orlginal fee Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Exam Ines: S1,125_00 13 2� CC, After The Fact2.oning/Land Use Pet3tlons: 2xthe normal petitlon fee _ Listed Species Survey (if EIS is not required). $B,gaQ-00 Fire Corte Plans Review Fees are collected of the thole cf appi+cation submission and those /ees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The land oeveiopment Code requires hleighbarhoad Notiffcotion mailers forAppiication5 heuded to hearing, and this fee is collected plfor to heoHng- A5 the atitherized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included In this submittal package. l understand that failure to Include all necessary submittal information may result iri the delay of processing this petition. AP checks payabla Cc,, fjoard of Coonty Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittai materl�N, and the permit fee shall be submitted to -- Growth Management Community oeveluprrent Department Toning Oivisicn ATTN: Business Center ZEOO north Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 , - ZA0:e1__ Applicant 5i nature I-SOL-lik-41 *SJ Printed Name Dzita fr 1114 Variance AppliCatiori(VA} 7/24 P110240G740519 FENCE ! WA L 12001of0 .x 4 U Ij G Page 18 of 403 ,t Collier County GMCD Public Portal Land Development Code Administrative Code Zoning Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: variance (VA) Date and Time: Tuesday 1/7/25 at 3: 00 ZOO""/ I_ P L's -A, F Property Information Assigned Planner: Sean Sammon Project Name: 547 10 6th Ave N (VA) PL#: 20240014059 PropertylD#: 62844600002 Current Zoning: RMF-6 ProjectAddress�47 106th Ave NCity:_ Naples State: FL Zip; 34108 Applicant: Thomas Regner Agent Name: Thomas Regner Phone: 609-235-6967 Agent/Firm Address: N/A City: State:_ Zip: Property Owner: Thomas Regner Livina Trust Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: 0 .23 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed # of Affordable Housing Units: iv. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: V. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: vi. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vii. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: viii. Is Project within an Area of Historical/Archaeological Probability? Pre -Application Meeting Notes 6/26/2024 Page 1 of 5 Growth Management Community Development - Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive - Naples, FL 34104 - 239-22-2400 - ww%v.collie•aountvfl.vov/ Page 19 of 403 Collier County Meeting Notes �L i4� 1 ` Wil li �Q`C: S l¢!li I r7i e Z-Q a. rz v2 wl_ l_ f4,j v i`,e S /arc-u rat Required: The most current Application Forms & the Property Ownership Disclosure Form are required for your submittal. Download from this link: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/qovernment/growth-management/divisions/planning-and- zoning- division/land-use-applications#!/ Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Pre -Application Meeting Notes 6/26/2024 Page 2 of 5 Growth Management Community Development - Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive - Naples, FL 34104 - 239-252-2400 - xmxa!w.collicrcounty fl.gov/ Page 20 of 403 547 10611 AVE (VA)— PL20240014059 — Pre-App Notes — Zoning — Sean Sammon January 7, 2025, 3:00 pm • Applicant - Fence and wall in the public utility easement. • Subject Property: ±0.23 acres zoned Residential Multi-Family-6 (RMF-6) • Q& A with Applicant: o Q: What is your variance request? Fence height? ■ A: Increasing the fence height from the 6' above original grade o Q: How did this come to be? What is the hardship? Typically land related ■ A: Slab height increase due to flood elevation requirements for new homes o Q: Are there any other variances for the subject property? • A: Just the fence height, and the easement issue to be handled separately • Staff Recommendations & Findings o Use PL20240001659, 824 & 828 98" Ave; final HEX Decision 2024-66 as a guide o Provide a new and current survey of the property o Understand that the Variance request is from the code section that you're varying from. In this instance it's from the LDC Sec. 5.02.03.C.2.b. for a residential lot o Staff recommends providing a clear and exact site design of all impacts from the variance request. The variance will need to be the exact difference of actual height extension, however higher than 6' the max will be (to tenths of feet, i.e. 20.3 feet) o Also, please make a table that includes the Required height, the Actual/Proposed height, and the difference between the two/the Variance; survey can serve as the basis for the site plan. o Justification needs to focus on identifying the land related hardship, such as limiting factors on the property that makes the proposed location the optimal location for proposed use, i.e., property lines & required flood elevation, etc. o Submit all required Easement documentation (EUA and/or LONO) • Please coordinate with Development Review Staff for the EUA issue: • Development Review Staff Reviewer, Tracey DeLaRosa: Tracey. DeLaRosaPcolliercountyfl gov or 239-252-2584 Page 21 of 403 • Development Review Manager, Lisa Blackledge: Lisa. Blacklidge@colliercountyfl gov or 239-252-2758 • Variance Process will reference LDC Sec. 9.04.00 and LDC Sec. 8.10.00 o Appropriate submittal: Complete application & required property & zoning information and supporting documents o Narrative or detailed explanation of request: ■ Explanation why increase is necessarylexplain Land Related Hardship) -THIS IS THE KEY ISSUE FOR THE APPLICATION & how increase came to be ■ Cover all the details of the existing conditions on the property as mentioned above; dates of permits, structures built, & property ownership acquisition date, o Provide responses to LDC Sec. 9.04.03 A - H, also included in the application o Provide a current survey of the subject property; identify any easements, etc. o Conceptual Site Plan (24"x36") and one 8.5xl 1 copy o Copy of last recorded deed, sale agreement, or notarized ownership o 8.5"xl 1"graphic location map of the site o Owner/Agent affidavit o The subject property is not in a historical/archaeological probability area o An Agent Letter shall be sent to property owners within 150 feet of the subject property's property lines covered by the petition following the initial staff review comments and prior to the resubmittal of the petition to the County. • Requires at least 1 advertised public hearing o Public Notice requirements LDC Sec. 10.03.06 F. ■ Mailed notifications & newspaper advertisements • One advertised HEX public hearing • Subject property < 1 acre, staffs responsibility to post a HEX Hearing advertisement sign no later than 15 days prior to scheduled hearing date o Final Decision Maker: Hearing Examiner, written decision complete 30 days after the scheduled hearing date • Any further questions, please contact me at Sean.Sammon@colliercountyflggv - (239)252-8422 2 Page 22 of 403 ThomasClarkeVEN From: Jocelyn NageondeLestang Sent: Friday, January 10, 2025 2:58 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: Sean Sammon Subject: RE: 547 106th Ave N (VA) - PL20240014059 - Pre-App Hi Thomas I don't believe there will be significant drainage (or stormwater) impacts associated with raising the height of this fence. Thanks Joss Jocelyn NageondeLestang Engineer II Development Review Office:239-252-2434 J.NageondeLestanq(a)-colliercountyfl.gov From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2025 1:44 PM To: Jocelyn NageondeLestang <J.NageondeLestang@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Sean Sammon <Sean.Sammon@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: 547 106th Ave N (VA) - PL20240014059 - Pre-App Hi Joss, Collier County offloom Any chance you could let me know today if you have any notes on this one in Naples Park? The applicant is trying to get this resolved, looks like the house will be built before we get to the HEX, and he wanted to get his Application in. Thanks 74amad &/ ale Operations Analyst - Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2526 1 Y, r+ - 6 - , --� 6, Page 23 of 403 Collier County Meeting Notes -Continued Note I: If site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Department along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection " to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddleton(&naplesgov.com ,Allyson Holland AMHolland(&napleszov.com, Robin Singer RSing-er(&nal2lesgov.com, Erica Martin emartin(&naples og v.com Note2: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Other fees collected prior to the issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. Pre -Application Meeting Notes 6/26/2024 Page 3 of 5 Growth Management Community Development - Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive - Naples, FL 34104 - 239-252-2400 - www.colliercount. flv�ov/ Page 24 of 403 Collier County Zoning Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20240014059 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ike Bosi Division Director-Planning&Zoning 252-1061 Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov Ray Bellows Manager— Planning & Zoning 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colIiercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Henderlong Zoning -Planner III 252-2464 rchard.henderlong@colIiercountyfl.gov Laura DeJohn Zoning - Vendor 252-5587 Laura.dejohn@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Kelly Zoning -Planner III 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning - Planner III 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP Zoning — Plannerlll 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ ric Ortman Zoning — Planner III 252-1032 Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov Sean Sammon Zoning— Planner III 252-8422 Sean.sammon@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Maria Estrada Zoning Planner II 252-2408 Maria Estrads@colliercountyfl.gov E Tim Finn, AICP Zoning - Planner III 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke Zoning - Operations Analyst 252-2526 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov Anthony Stoltz Utility Planning - Supervisor 252-5835 Anthony.stoltz@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Drew Cody Utility Planning — Project Mgr III 252-2917 Drew. cody@col liercountyfLgov LE Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov Ll Shon Fandrich Utilities -Project Mgt -Supervisor 252-8835 Shon.fandrich@colliercountyfl.gov Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov Michael Gibbons Structural/Resident Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring -Project Mgr II 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov Sean Lintz Battalion Chief - N. Collier Fire 597-9227 Blintz@northcollierfire.com _I Bryan Horbal Captain — N. Collier Fire 552-1367 Bryan.horbal@colliercountyfl.gov LJ Daniel Turner Plan Examiner - N. Collier Fire 252-2521 Daniel.turner@colliercountyfl.gov L-1 Linda Naples Sr. Plan Examiner— N. Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda. naples@colliercountyfLgov i Shar A. Beddow Dep. Fire Marshal - Gr Naples Fire 241-1422 sbeddow@gnfire.org I Thomas Mastroberto Gr. Naples Fire Site Plans Rev. III 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov Derek Perry Assistant County Attorney 252-8066 Derek. perry@colIiercountyfLgov James Sabo, AICP GMP, Comp Planning Manager 252-2708 james.sabo@colliercountyfl.gov Parker Klopf GMP—Comp Planning — Planner III 252-2471 Parker. klopf@colliercountyfLgov I Jessica Malloy GMP-Comp Planning -Planner II 252-4329 Jessica.malloy@colliercountyfl.gov Stephenne Barter GMP—Comp Planning —Planner II 252-7707 Stephenne.barter@colliercountyfl.gov Pre -Application Meeting Notes 6/26/2024 Page 4 of 5 Growth Management Community Development - Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe DriN e -Naples, FL 34104 - 239-252-2400 - wwxv.collie-aruntvfl.`ov/ Page 25 of 403 Collier County ❑ Michele Mosca,AICP Community Development Planner III 252-2834 Michele. mosca@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Craig Brown Environmental Review -Mgr. 252-2548 craig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov Alexandra Mitchel Environmental Specialist 252-2907 Alexandra.Mitchel@colliercountyfl.gov -' David Roe Environmental Specialist 252-2915 David. Roe@ col IiercountyfLgov _ Lauren Murray Environmental Specialist 252-2306 Lauren.murray@colliercountyfl.gov _ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision Vend. 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov Jocelyn Nageon De Lestang, P.E..e Engineering - Stormwater 252-2434 ocel n.Na eondeLestan colliercount fl. ov ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack. mckenna@coIIiercountyfLgov _ Matt McLean, P.E. Division Director - IF, CPP & PM 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Cormac Giblin, AICP Division Director— Economic. Dev. & Housing 252-2460 Cormac.giblin@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sarah Harrington Manager —Planning 252-4211 Sara h.harrington@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Jamie Cook Division Director- Development Review 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Lisa Blacklidge Development Review Manager- Planning 252-2758 Lisa. blacklidge@colIiercountyfLgov ❑ Christine Willoughby Planner III 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brett Rosenblum-P.E. Development Review— Supervisor Project Mgr. 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Templeton Landscape Review— Planner III 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov L_I Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov Ll Gino Santabarbara Impact Fees — Planner III 252-2925 Gino.santabarbara@colliercountyfl.gov Ll Diane Lynch Management Analyst 1 252-4283 diane.lynch@colliercountyfl.gov Renald Paul Client Services 252-2443 Renald.paul@colliercountyfl.gov L Connie Thomas Client Services -Supervisor 252-6369 Consuela.thomas@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email �10W1A w✓YM �.+�r'j�'V1S� Pre -Application Meeting Notes 6/26/2024 Page 5 of 5 Growth Management Community Development • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • w;ww.collicrcountvfl.vov/ Page 26 of 403 CoiCer Cv__ty Growth Management Community Development Dept. ZONING STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING Meeting Date: Tuesday 1/7/25 at 3:00 Zoning Operations Staff: Thomas Clarke 547 106th Ave N (VA) - PL20240014059 - Planner: Sean Sammon • Applicant Submitting Request: Thomas Regner - Homeowner 609-235-6967 tregner@regnerandassociates.com • Agent to list for PL# Thomas Regner - Homeowner • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) Thomas Regner Living Trust • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: Variance (VA) • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): n/a • Details about Project: Fence and Wall in the Public Utility Easement. 5e 477-,+eti 12 d Su,4 vu Aa.y _v S� 12.t.Jey Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Connie Thomas- Supervisor — Permitting Consuela.thomas@colliercountyfl.gov - Phone: 239-252-2473 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Page 27 of 403 PL20240014059 Summary Request Applicant: Thomas J. Regner, Trustee for Thomas Regner Living Trust 553 106t" Ave N, Naples, FL 34108 Cell. 609-235-6967 Property: 547 10611 Ave N, Naples, FL 34108 Parcel # 62844600002 Permit applications and status: PRDM20240522584 / Demolition / Finaled PRFH2O240623403 / 1-2 Family Home / Inspections Commenced PRSPL20240729044 / Pool / Inspections Commenced PRFW20240729045 / Fence & Wall / Rejected Summary of Request I am in the process of building a new home in Naples Park and am seeking approval to install a 6' fence on a 2' wall in the public utility easement at the rear of the property. Background In February 2024, 1 purchased the property at 545 & 547 1061" Ave N, which is adjacent to my current residence. The property is 1 1/2 lots (75' wide) and there was a single -story duplex on the property that was built in 1968. My intention was to demolish the duplex and build a new single -story house on the property. The elevation of the slab of the existing duplex was 10.8', or approximately 5" above the elevation of the center of the road of 10.37'. The front yard and driveway elevations were lower than both the street and slab. During Hurricane Ian in 2022, it appeared to be the only home on the 500 block of Page 28 of 403 s 106" Ave N with a flooding issue. The front of the property was flooded and required sandbagging of the two front doors. Into uring the house prior to purchase, the building had a strong odor of dampness and mold. Current code requires that the slab of the new home be a minimum of 18" above the crest of the road, or approximately 12'. The new slab is at an elevation of approximately 12.4% slightly above the required elevation and at a similar elevation to my adjoining property. This required significant fill to be added to the property. As noted above, my permit application for the Fence / Wall was rejected. My understanding is that there are two issues. The first is that there are approval requirements to build a block or wood wall within the Public Utility Easement. The second is that a fence / wall height is limited to 6' above original grade, prior to bringing in fill to accommodate the elevation requirements of the new slab. This requirement presents several problems related to slopes within the property and landscaping. However, my greatest concern is related to privacy for myself and my neighbors. Attached are several documents along with discussion below. - Pre-App Survey. This survey was prepared as I was purchasing the property and reflects elevations of the property, including the pre- existing duplex, property lines and center of the road. - Pre-App Survey Supplement. This shows that the average elevation of the rear property line, prior to bringing in fill, was 9.9'. There is an existing 6' wooden fence along that property line with the top of that fence at an elevation of 15.9'. The new slab is at 12.4'. The top of the existing fence, which I believe is the allowable height of a new fence, is only 3.5' higher than the slab. This eliminates privacy for both myself and neighbors. - Pre-App photos numbers 1 thru 4. The property behind my lot, on 107tn Ave N, is a double lot (100') which is vacant. The photos show the following: Page 29 of 403 o Photo #1 was taken from the lanai level of my new house and shows a friend standing in the vacant lot on 107" o Photo #2 was taken of me standing at the lanai level of the new house from the vacant lot. o Photo #3 was taken from the lanai level of my new house and shows the friend standing in the street on 107tn o Photo #4 was taken of me standing at the lanai level of the new house from the street on 107tn All of the photos show the top of the existing fence in which the top of the fence is 6' above original grade. Clearly, no privacy is allowed for the neighbors or me as I use the lanai, pool or outside shower. Also, I understand that the owner of the vacant lot is planning on building. As they raise the property for that new house, privacy would be further reduced for both homes. - Pre-App Easement Use Agreement. EUA dated August 13, 2024. Page 30 of 403 a �aF lP�7snf�E r�17�00'P, 9�f9,"SCTE 134-VAL a 1 vd fr ALF - — -u-I' I _- - 'r w rip. =w War" 0 .w x M /0 6 AVr IV r©,�I' Page 32 of 403 Need Help? Co per County Growth Management Community Development Department GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides VARIANCE PETITION APPLICATION Variance from Setbacks Required for a Particular Zoning District LDC section 9.04.00 & Code of Laws section 2-83 — 2-90 Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code PROJECT NAME:_ �L� 12 P(} C 9 _z -5- £ 6 Fu 2 (z h mac. K Lt5 T 2 �Q�! APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: Telephone: E-Mail Address: Name of Agent: Firm: Address: Telephone: — E-Mail Address: City: Cell: Cell: City: State: ZIP: Fax: State: ZIP: Fax: BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. Variance Application (VA) 3/27/24 Page 1 of 6 Planning and Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.col I iercountyfl.gov Page 33 of 403 PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: Section/Township/Range: _J. Unit: Lot: Block: Total Acreage: Address/ General Location of Subject Property: ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property: Front: f.t. Corner Lot: ❑ Yes ❑ No Side: f.t. Waterfront Lot: ❑ Yes ❑ No Rear: f.t. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. Variance Application (VA) 3/27/24 Page 2 of 6 Page 34 of 403 ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: City• State: ZIP: City: State• ZIP: NATURE OF PETITION On a separate sheet, attached to the application, please provide the following: 1. A detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25 ft. to 18 ft.; when property owner purchased property; when existing principal structure was built (include building permit number(s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc. 2. For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a-h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. Variance Application (VA) 3/27/24 Page 3 of 6 Page 35 of 403 b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. g) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? 4. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, please provide copies. Variance Application (VA) 3/27/24 Page 4 of 6 Page 36 of 403 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checkf or: . Variance Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) Pre -Application Meeting Notes Project Narrative Completed Addressing Checklist Property Ownership Disclosure Form Conceptual Site Plan 24" x 36" and one 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ Survey of property showing the encroac ment mea s u red inteet�__* Affidavit of Authorizationsigned and notarized Deeds/Legal(s) Location map Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial ❑ Historical Survey or waiver request, if applicable EJ Environmental Data Requirements or exemption justification Li Once the first set of review comments are posted, provide the assigned planner with draft Agent Letter and address of property owners ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. Variance Application (VA) 3/27/24 Page 5 of 6 Page 37 of 403 Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following reviewers: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Historical Review: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Parks and Recreation Director: Olema Edwards ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Other: �j�l P di61 tv4Te' A- — ZQ�"- IU�w•u:ti FEE REQUIREMENTS �Y Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 VarlanC Petition: Residential- $2,000.00 o Non -Residential- $5,000.00j0 00 0 51h and Subsequent Review- 20% of original fee Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: , 25.00 1 After The Fact Zoning/Land Use Petitions: 2x the normal petition fee Listed Species Survey (if EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for App lica tio ns headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and the permit fee shall be submitted to: � / �(VWb K L�2 1 . � XX L7 Growth Management Community Development Department Zoning Division ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Date Variance Application (VA) 3/27/24 Page 6 of 6 Page 38 of 403 Nature of Petition PL20240014059 547 106t" Aire N, Naples, FL 84108 1. Detailed Explanation of Request: am requesting@ variance from c. 5.03,02.,2.d..to increae the fence height on my residenti j.- ro pertyfrom W to u nd rutood that the process wiLL r Wne li c hea rirjg with a Hearing amitle�er LD Sec, 8.1. QA also understan.d..thc im lic Gritearia uoder LDQ Sec-1-04.,40and have resraoded to the r ant questions in th�_11 r a_n.C-e PetiCi0-n Application. I am in the process of building a new home in Naples Park and am seeking approval to install a Wfence on a 2'wood retaining wall, including in the public utility easement at the rear of the property. Ire February 2024, 1 purchased the property at 545 & 547 106 "Ave N. The property is 1 1/2 lots (75' wide) and there was a single -story duplex on the property that was built in 1968. fly intention was to demolish the duplex and buitd a new singte-story house on the property. That demolition was completed in JuLy 2024 and construction of the new house began in August 2024. The anticipated completion date of the new house is April 2025. The relevant permits and current status related to this project are: PRDM20240522584 l Demotitton ! Finaled PRFH2O2406234031 1-2 Family Horne l Inspections Commenced P RS PL20240729044I Pool1 Inspections G ommenced PRFW202407290451 Fence &Walll Rejected PE20240014059 FFNOE / WA t �NGMAs REGHER MAR 24 2M Page 39 of 403 The e€evation of the slab of the duplex was 10.8', or approximately 5„ above the elevation of the center of the road of 10. 7'. The front yard and driveway elevations were tower than both the street and slab. During Hurricane Ian in 2022, it appeared to be the only home on the 500 block of 106th Ave N with a flooding issue. The front of the property was flooded and required sandbagging of the two front doors. In touring the house prior to purchase, the buitding had a strong odor of dampness and motel. Current code requires that the slab of the new home be a mini mum of 18" above the crest of the road, or approximately 12'. The new slab is at an elevation of a pp roxi rn ate ly '12.4', slightly above the required elevation and at a similar elevation to the adjoining property at 553 10 111 Ave N. This required significant #ill to be added to the property. My permit application for the Fence 1 Wall was rejected. My understanding is that there are two issues. The first is that there are approval requirements to build a block or wood retaining wall within the Public Utility Easoment. The second is that a fence! waLL height is limited to W above original grade, prior to bringing in fillto accommodate the elevation requirements of the now slab. This requirement presents several problems related to slopes within the property and landscaping. However, my greatest concern is related to privacy for myself and ray neighbors. The property included under this request has three adjoining properties: 1) The property to the east was built in 2019 and has a 6' fence on a 2' allthat runs along the side prope rtyr line. I request approval for a VA l L 13 /�Y Page 40 of 403 G' fence along that property line on backfill up to the current waU. This will, in effect, be 8' above original grade. 2) The property to the west also has a house under construction. The house previously on the property was demolished and the house under construction will likely be cornpleted Spring 2025. 1 request to build a 2'retention wall alongthat side property line with a 6' fence above, for a total of 8' above original grade. The builder of that property expressed preliminary interest in raising that lot as well. If so, it would eliminate the need for the retention wall between the properties and the 6' fence would be on the elevated ground. j There is a 100' property that borders the entire rear length of my property to the north. The property was purchased a few gears ago and the existing house was demolished. I understand that the current owners will be building on that lot and, if so, will have similar elevation concerns. My request is to build a 6' fence on a 2' wood retainingwall in the public utility easement. I am in discussions with Lisa Blacl lidge and Tracey DeLa Rosa from the County regarding a minor exception to the Easement Use Agreement to get approval for the wood retaining wait. Attached are several docurnents atongwith discussion below. - Pre- pp Survey. This survey was prepared as I was purchasing the property and reflects elevations of the property, including the pre-existing duplex, property lines and center of the road. - Pre-App Survey Supplement. This shows that the average elevation of the rear property line, prior to bringing in fill, was 9.9'. There is an existing 6' wooden fence alongthat property line with the top of that fence at an elevation of 15.9'. The new slab is at 12.4'. The top of the existing fence, which I believe is Ft20240014059 FENCE l WALL JHOHAS RE6NER MAR 74 2025 Page 41 of 403 the allowable height of a new fence, is on[y 3.5' higher than the slab. This eliminates privacy for both myself and neighbors. - Pre-App Easement Use Agreement. EUA dated August 13, 2024. - Pre-App photos numbers I thru 3. The property behind my lot, on 10711 Ave N, is a double lot (100') which is vacant. The photos show the following: o Photo #1 was taken from the lanai level of my new house and shaves a friend standing in the vacant lot on 107th. o Photo #2 was taken from the lanai level of my new house and shows the friend standing in the street on 107t". o Photo #3 was taken of me standing at the lanai level of the new house from the street on 107'. Ali of the photos sham the top of the existing fence to which the top of the fence is 6' above original grade. MearLy, no privacy is allowed for the neighbors or me as I use the lanai, pool or outside shower. Also, I understand that the owner of the vacant lot is pLanning on building. As they raise the property for that new house, privacy would be further reduced for both homes. 2. Site Alterations Under LDC Section 9.04.02 The request is to build a W fence on a ' wall. This will require additional fill to the property. 3. Criteria Explanations pursuant to LDC Section 9.04.00 Page 42 of 403 a) Yes. The elevation of the property has been raised to comply with current flood elevation requirements. The house previously on the property, built in 1968, was on a stab with an elevation of 10.8. Current code requires a minimum slab elevation of approximateLy 12', which is 18" above the crest of the road. The new slab is at an elevation of approxirnately12.4°, slightty above the required elevation. Due to the increase in elevation, a fence aRowed by current code with a maximum of W above original grade, is inadequate for allowing appropriate privacy for me and the neighboring residents. b) Yes. At the time of purchase in February 2024, the elevation of the land was inadequate to meet current flood elevation requirements for the slab of the new house. This required significant fill to be added to the property, The land elevation at the tirne of purchase was not a result of any action taken by the applicant. c) Yes. A literal interpretation of the LDC creates a hardship for the applicant. Accordingto the LDC Section 5.0.02..2.b, the maximum fence height in the side and rear yard for the subject property is 6'. Due to the required elevation of the new house, this fence height is insufficient to provide the necessary privacy to the subject property as well as the neighboring properties. d) Yes. The variance, if granted, will be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. This variance request is rnWrnum due to the fence maintaining a 0' height as permitted by code, however, it would be installed on a 2' retaining wall. FL202400I4059 FENCE ! W# 16 1�q THOMAS RE6NER PEAR 24 2025 Page 43 of 403 e) No. Granting the variance will not allow any special privileges since a fence and retaining wall is permitted within the zoning district as similar to the adjacent property to the east at 553 106111 Ave N. f) Yes. Grantingthe variance will be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or be otherwise detrimental to public welfare. The fence variance will aRow for privacy for my home as well as neighboring homes. In fact, disapproval of the variance would negatively impact the neighborhood due to diminished privacy. g) No. Where are no natural conditions that create a hardship - However, the variance is requested because of current code which stipulates the elevation of the new slab on the property, the impacts of the elevation increase to the privacy of the applicant and neighboring properties, and the increased height of the slab of the adjacent property. h) lies. Granting the variance will be consistent with the Growth ManagemQnt Flan. 4. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications To my knowledge there have been no official interpretations or zoning verifications rendered on this property within the last year. PCIEMM959 FUCE7 -WA CC J-Hifts kraxrk is 24 262517 Page 44 of 403 LOT 12 q, S W �Tl�"f 'f3W IW i�. S 07'37A�Y` E i34.4f'Af. # '. HIM, 77i a a a Lf spy*d2"d9-N' i.4CsL�'�. I01,33urw Y34 97'df. �J Cli h d t�I 4 4� $� io £ A 1pa mq ww �� ww Per, R4��}~ u �t g a k€ gill nj sI,L� a � o LU C3-C W 4.4 LLj s Al F00240014059 FENCE/ WALL THOMAS RE6RER i4AR 21 2025 Page 46 of 403 O rCr rrxxnas Rmgf*r Lr9IN Trust Adrms-. 547106Av4NNaplrs1�34lill'J Parmit 'No'�202407'29045 - - - - - EASEMENT USE AGREEMENT T'b'F EASL'M$tk-F [!5F Ai;t El++ll2 'I` f AJ3r Inrar l i4 made es ol`this 12+ day of A mMI _. 24 24 « #,v turf! brittrrmi 7lrarriri:l�a�rlrr LJt+lnp Trust .- _ __ I"Ovrrt+:�'k brut � ulTicr County ("C'u,laty"3, . WHERE AS, {Musser is the wurrcet, fit owner cf lbgt certisln rs.al properry known as _ __r+TAo10a Park UrHk 6 9l_K U W IQ of Lot 12 , r,[r of tot 13 aecardirtfi t« the rAm tlbertiuf at{ rm w&-,d b, I+Im I" of the Fublic l*cor46 0f ('411it•r Cuue,ty, nontla (hsreinsftas`SubjW y"}:,mod WillMPAS, = %at I`onll irl flit Sack 3 Purge 15 - . tl,e raunry ill rtCCVrd QWnCT Of CCFI7in axnrrx rusavr __ P,U,E easrtotmt VO4, as rtFvTLmrcd in pttragraph _. 1 of Jdte Plat dratilr�ttiinns, a POMEH, of vAkh lm`ts bcm the Suhj= and Wl 11;ItEAS, Owner has err wishrs ea Coltmm l ar irmTall a Frtno)rRsltainr�� wail "he "! nemtscrirn ,at"? i t a portiUn of tilt Ctrur�y'sravm,nni I,x tati on ' ►v�er's gr�,p,crty; r W1IEREA51 the Cuutrty ltaa nu PAML r objM-1i0a to Lhe ule atilt E'.rrL7OaKl' FMrtr within tho Baxrn%:nt Arco. prswWkxi that 0%ner agrces W the ternls and cortdititxis ,,o Furth bnit+w. �4i. W. THIE.FLh:F ORE. in couidcrauen irf the Sum Of S 10,00 and 01hcr goad and valuahlt considcratisu,, the rexciTn wW suI iciency of which Is hereby nc"owTcdge4, Ckwncr hcrekv ilk? a as Ialkm%7 I . The elrova meitahq arr titre and corr=L and are incotporatcd here�m. I Owner shall provide to #hr CcNM;y whe(tvcr access the f'Ounty CUgUirrs fa CUat'rniae its CAtCMcgnr rightA and further agrees t+j weive any claim of damage so vic ElnCIVIkChfnrnt arNi Pig our of the Counly'S mair,trnatsCe A66% its`e=s within the l 8aerrrrnr Area whelim "uh darsraw it immdrwini nr 4rh;rArrn;anat- I The County a8rets tlxal tmtil 01ha wise nolifmd, Ow>Itrr may con+inut the use of I;ucgcxar hMcal within Ilw EaF, mint Area, lmwevcr, the Cgwntlr rei¢int the right, iA irs s alC diwre"OV4 up damwd by written -egurm that the Car roacitwPum he removed f)Dm the FAmmmrir Arcw, which owner 5hu11 dtr at dmlr sole car atxl cxPtnW within a rcm.w mole rum Valm rW&P of such ref -I. Fhe L=rwelurwl snail he as dovi Lie orr the buirdirig Pmnnii applicaliuu netu,bcr X2 072W45 Filrsl ►+stlt C"J10 CuLmt}' Gf0V h anagcmcm Dg=rmtctu, wW r o other Caastrnetiorr shall he in CAC trr raid Eu�,rcnt 5, Owner ii$7=� far Ium'}x;rcelf and mzAx—.s,r% sod migm that t#cy shall reli-atir, indenmit� and hull tlw t,Lx tuty harm, Its5 For and agai fist any and ,Jill obliprirrnsr, ulairm.. liabilities, "Penscs a.ndr'ur fees (irwJuding rem-,m ale thorns-y's fees and court casrs) iaeludi09 PCr$otFsl injury Or property d 311112c arising otst r+fdtC tet•C tTJ 1[11V Wctttcm Area by rite OWFmr, hisA�r rcRxctiYc contractors, agents. cnlo s or invitcos at Any time wh He the Frtuuacl,11crtt r ik, within the 1��a,3cmertt Afea. 1=umbet. Uwr , for hi+rbrclf Succ ors and asr;iJpls sgree9 iv rels,t c rind ]loll! tale C'outrty kurmleSA fsurm itm,i 30rW rtny ffixIalI obiigistions. claims. Irabili7jc5. ckTsea.eE u,di+er tuW�luditrg rC.MWWlfir tttkrrnC,�'s {off fit! WW QaMI i,kCladiag Pcr,9031 hqury tV lr+PenYdaniqQ arising ottt of Usti utW of I lit Ea'-wacrrt Area by lief^ Cmmry. inc ludiag bin milt limited in. dm7wge which may occur to th>e ncrn"hrri= dtairg nca marina) vperatim mairncramee, repa it andhlr rcplahxmcm, as appl ieashlt, of th e FASciner,ZAT" undDr the F.ricroubmeni aridr'dr tha infrastrar iwr, which mAy Iynw or in tht Future be Ioca,ed wiLhin the l :,s+eme,rt ,grxa. F.UA - 49)w Chuner j e I QT. t NALL - � WIER F MAR 24 6 q Page 47 of 403 6. Tliu A ttCellacni hall tkl eccurded at tilt I'Jxner's a pcnsc iu Lhc Of1kiai i�rcnrds ofi oltica C'oprbty, t f�arida. and shalt he a covehant funning wltk Lhe lttind and shislt be 15Wing upon silt Iicirs. personal rtpsrsCrR,r¢ivts, grua:sss assign a>td succx"cws- Itw WITNESS W'}IER130F. the partite hurto have executed this Easemeril Uge Agrermenl as of the bate tirhl above wriurn- V41T 14 F.::5"-,' / yr wi '!1'il7i3 A Ownv p I SJ idurc 02. -� TTtiomw Regm Living Trust Witness 1,1 VYwred ?lame i z;r F1 P tcd { Z. — - -4 e--4JV4'p)e5-F1-N1.7 w,rncf, �I Addr w1iiiCSS i!1 t�11 i1C� W b r-2 Printed Name Witness r7 4ddrv.55 Statc of pTorida. Goa ntp srf Collier She N" going iriwuIt1 r was �clCnawlad cd iacfose me bymcmu of I(li+hysical pre-wnre or ❑0L11h1e •11193rc.-7titni this ray of 20 A, by T?sotriss Fl@RRET Such persuntIl Notary Nbl is mugs chuck Appl icnble iavx: �n n h i e �r;�imwl I� kYai.w� ra mC EUSEa PALMM P'Hes Koduced a curr m drivers I IccAm I 0DWONAINS MH NMU []Has produced T _ as idemi trim. r "�"t tq era �ct#inr �iic 4t�a3ature �POEary Public I�i 7+i�unc - - PRE. PARED BY' BOARD O CMNTY COMMISSIONERS OFCO J ILK I~;O12KTY, FI_.ORi0A Prepramrs !�tuua. ��.: >�,s. !s � �� as dcsigne� nfthc �ut�nty l�it�tsg�r� 11'r--parem Address pussrahm to Afcndu Run No, I6,A•25, dalL-d lanuary 14. 2020- _-_ PL20240014059 FENCE/ WALL THOMAS NE6NER MAR 24 2025 Page 48 of 403 • Ao PM240014�59 FENCE / VA L L JNOMAS REUMER IIAR. 24 2921 A y ■: - � . ��■ � � � at �P■IIR Conceptual Site 1 Drainage Plan PL20240014059 547 106" Ave N, Naples, FL 34103 y understanding fronn Lisa Blawcklidge, Manager of Ptanning Development Reviews is that l need to apply for two permits - one for the wall and one for the fence - after the va riance is approved. Attached are two document : The conceptual site plan - An email from Jocelyn NageondeLestang, Engineer II Development Review, stating that there will be no significant drainage or storrnwater impacts associated with raising the height of the fence_ FL2924g0;4059 FCNCEI WALL THOMAS REGNER MAR 74 2025 Page 52 of 403 rt ¢=x t �A �gg } co 0 O M LO ThornasGarke&VEN From: l4c lyn NageardeLermnq Sent: Friday, January 10. 2025 2A PM To. 7'h0rne5CJ,m rkeV E N Cc-- Sean Sa:Z_morr Subject RE. 547 1061hAve.1`4 (VA} • PXZ40014059 • Pre-App I donlbnLreveihere witl be sign ili0an* tlrMn2ge (orstormwatae) ImP=z nmcletod WITh Temngthe halghrol tt i Llence, T• .,jnkz Jq-$5t -,00 �11 idayecr-tO eS'lbri_ C r n r`.w�r7srti - kveiopmenr Review t[Nage OG >Ln"y agv From: ThorrrayCi¢rkpV�hE cTi3arrtiS.C1#rkkl�r,courTtytC.gov? 5errt. Frlday. Jan Lrary 10, 2025 1:44 PM To: Jocelvn NagfmdeLestang J,Nageondetestang rcOflierCount} , rru Cc, Se4[15ammcn cSean.54mrr%un@colfi12rcounryf;.gov> Subject: FI.N. 5q7 t0f h Ave N (VA) - PL2024M14059 - Pre-ADp Fri Jose, P!D 'oIlii 'r CountN f offlace Any chance you could let Me krlD r today if you have any noms or this one in Naal.ea Park? The MPP44i ---ant is trying to got thin raimtvecf, Looks like the Meuse wits bk. Et jilt I�etfom vve get to the I-IE-X. anci he VVartted 10 gOL his Application in. Thanks OpenticmS Analyst -Porting Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Nzp?ts, FL 341 D4 Phone: Z39-252-2526 PL25240014059 FENCE / VACC THOMAS REGNER WAR 24 2025 Page 54 of 403 PreMd by l! ]Kent Amo, P.A. clo Tammy Alter Naples Title, Ins:, 5185 Castello Drive, Suite 2 Naples, FL 34103 (2.39) 643-IW Parcel Identification No 62W600002 Consideration. $900,000,00 Documentary Stamps. $6,300,00 INSM e512107 OR 6332 PC 3009 RECOR❑ED 22CV2024 a'03 AM P40ES 2 C''LE=RK 4F THE= CIRCCUIT COURTANO COMPTROLLER COl_LJER COUNTY FLORIDA ROC@.70 $6,3130.00 REC $18.50 CONG 1900,00b.00 VG Abt d Lniv L" Fa Qk00rmq nut71,_ WARRANTY DEED (STATL TkY FORM- SEC MN 689M, F.3-) Tlhis indenture made the 22ad day of February, 2U24 between Rotheoast Properties LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, whose post office address is 328 CaAtan Place, Maples, FL 34108, Orantor, to Thomas J. Regner, Trustee of The Thomas Regaer Living Trust dated January 15, 2021*, whose post nine address is 553 100b Avenue North, Naples, FL 34108, Grantee: Witnessetli, that said Grantor, for and in consideration of thl< Sinn of TEN DOLLARS (TJ,S,S 10.00) and other good and valuable con stdomdons to said Grantor in hand paid by said G antee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said Grantee, and 'Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the foilowing described land, situate, lying and being in Colliez County, Florida, to -wit. The West 112 of Lot 12, and all of Lot 1.3, Mack 76, UNIT NO.6 NAPLES PARK, acwrdirlg to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page IS, of the Public Records of Collier County, ]" lori€la.. *W;f6 -F-11 .srar &xxd autbon LX t0 grotoot, oonscrvp, ball, lea.s0, ouUwnbgs, VT vtriorwisc rilanage Undlnr dispose of the tract personal and real estate, il�Icludhag the authority to accept notes and mortgages on the sale and disposition of the real estate, or any part thereto, it being the intent to vest in Trustees frill rights as Grantee of the property as authorized and contemplated by Section 689.073. Florida Statutes Together with all the tenemerits, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise apperwning, Subject to taxes for 2024 and subsequent years, not yet due and payable; covenants. restrictions, easements, reservations and limitations of record, if any. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the sane in fee simple forever, And Orwitor hereby covenant with the Cxrantee that the Granter is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple, that Grantor have good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land and that the Grantor hereby fully waiTmit the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of al l persons whornsoever, wn, "r P L ? 0 2 1, 0 0 1 4 D 5 9 FENCE I W A L C THOMAS REGNER MBAR 24 2025 Page 55 of 403 In Witness Whereof, Grantor have hercunto sa Grantees band and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sewed and delivered in our presence: W;�v�u�611=r16Y' #mess 1 Panted Natme / cs d imss � 4P'Vr, der 695. 6, Fla. Star Witness #2 Signature witness 92 Printed N cme Witness Address: Oc.,si4t, �L _ S N L Per Sec. fi95.26, Fla. Stat. STATE OF FLORIDA Rothcoast Properties LL.C, a Florida Iimited liability z atn�� - - Debra Roth, l By: z �Zzff �� William M. Roth, Member COUNTY OF COLLIER � The foregoing insent was acknowledged before me by rneens of { ysi02d presence or () online nota ' On this day of February, 2024 by Debra Roth and William M. Roth, Members of Rothcoast Pr ertie [,LC, a L Limited C.iability Company, oft behalf of the Limited Liability Company. TAMMYLAITER •A V A #HNW26(M igElA l�f 11C ,- `� eSS mher1C.2U4 .w gaa3laarrayFeinln„c�9oo-39�7ar� Print< T e1S p arue of Notary Persorially known: OR Produced ldentification:_ Type of Identification Producedr File No Nr-20244 F qwp „ r ncVA a Page 56 of 403 _t Collier County Addressing Checklist Gmco Public Portal Land Develo ment Code Adrnpnwstrative Corte Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your sut}mittal, IWnr, marked With a * are required for every application, other items are apOonaI and may not apply to every project Forms are valid for G mnths following their submittal-, an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe ail any lime the properties within the project boundary are modified. 'Name of OwnedAgerlt. Applicant Contact Information 51 Sr Firm [1f agent): - Address: 3 Iod 'City. P 'State' L -ZIP- LY. / �� `Telephone: , ' . ' - 6. Cell: 1707. , �61- Fax: '1"-Mali Address: if — Location Information 'Folio (property ID) Nurnber(s) of the subject property or }properties [Attach list if necessary)' R 4* 6 'A 0 D Legal Description of subject property or properties [Attach list if neGessaryT Ill PL� g frs v"'{1- 5neet Add ress{es} wht�ree applicable, if already asuigned- Addressing Checkllst W14r2O24 R 74 7p 7 5 Page 1 01 . Gruwth ManagvZOOM l 11M rn LARAV L)c.ytil„pm Snr -C)plliyU♦1J�A d4 µ%glal Ut— N11hLk?,UnC3r -->liW -Non rla r},wnrw Dr1— • %api ,, FL f4144 -239-252 '244XI • WN,-, rz 9v11 n}__ 0 sllisri��L Page 57 of 403 Collier County Project Information Acceptance of this form does not constitute project: andlor street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. pre -approval of project name andlor street name may be requested by contacfi+lg es at QUID fddressing ?colliercplinLfl_gov or 239-252-2482 prior to your ebmitteI- .s. n-WV 4"Wi- LIAR , 4 "P�frl--- Current Project Name_ Proposed Project Name: Proposed Street Name: #A FL a 0�-Yzpa1 q0 5' Latest Approved Project Number le.g., SDP-94-W PPL.-2002•AR-####, PL2017000 j I Submi#tal Requirement Checklist Additional documents may be atFached to this form and can include. Checkmark the items included with this application: Requirements for Review: Required: LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposi~d project boundary. 9 List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. ❑ E-mail frorn Addressing Official for any pre -approved project andlor street names. ❑ The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to. Growth Management Community Development Department I GMCD Portal: http;:rfcvportal.collie rcountyfl.navfcityyiewweb Questions? Email: Front.Desk@coliiercounW_go_v PkM24004059 FENCE / W t AddreSSIng Checklist 611412O24 Page 2 of 2 t:r m03 ,17"emem C o mmuhLly DEVAVmdhl ' 0[ r1tia;ea & Reguidtvey M4BER=oqr 2800Nvr4hHrw,licuDriv-NaptcA,F1,',41�#•Z�+}?.5�-2#6Q a�inlNcr�nuntrJl,�_, Page 58 of 403 R � gg q �„ i 44 I s � f ■ Z.1.2 _. YNt War la, O LOT ra Tu, —' - w ��t iC7A3' W.Vv 4Y s�I 3 yaF0 a 4 10 qe 3�! ken CY UD V%s Cl) O O N m a. GIS 547 106th Ave N L7 P.rafls AWIW* Wm urban faml 7104 G a I er Caurrty IFrapffWApprelBer 1h M Ctl CaEar Caney PipPM AppFd W mco firnibW 67p(ftiditg Cie m8ti ormrtN grxJ up-0adass ifomla"r� rbywan4nIles NpTened a imMoo Ere Ixaalabd ro, 1Yk datahereiiY ilSa , Ur di irtar-Faelolioi. PL20249014059 FENCE 1 WAL L ! ! THUMAS RL5NER MAR 24 2025 0" Page 60 of 403 Aer Cmnt Growth Management Community developmcknt Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Maples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Emaif:13iMDClientSet'vlaes colliereauntyfl.gna www.cp111ercountyH .gau PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with ail land use petitions, except for AppeaIS and Zoning Verifkation Letters, Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form, Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is awned fee simple by an IWIVIDIJ.AaL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the uercentage of such interest: c. Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is awned by a CORPORATION , list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock awned by each: l Name and Address i If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address , % of Ownership i J V(,p V FL2024001'4040 FENCE ! WA L 0112023 I N O. A S R E 5 N E R MAR 24 2025 ( Rage 1 of 3 Page 61 of 403 o r nt Growth Management Community DeYelopment DOpartrnent 28CO North horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34204 Phone: i239] 252-1036 j Email, CMDCilent5ervices@rolliercountyfl.gov www.00iJiercountyfl.gov d_ If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LINTITED PARTNERSHIP, list the riarne of the general and/or limited partners; -- Name and Address %of Ownership e_ If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the 41ilcers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Narne and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: f_ If any contingency clause or contract terrns involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnCrship, or trust: Name and address g. Date subject property acquired A01V ❑ Leased: Term of Cease years Anonths if, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following; 41JZ023 PMR9 14059 FENCE/ WAUC ,J949AS REGNER NAR 24 �15 4 Page 2 of 3 Page 62 of 403 o ey Clity Growth M a nagernent Com mu nity Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 3+3104 Phone; {239� M-1036 1 Email; faMpClientServites collier€ountyfl.gov www.coliTerrountyfl.gov Date of op#ion: €}a#e option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements For peNtion types are located on the assoCiated applica#lonform. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized ogeplfapphcorit far this petition, r Gttest khat oU of the information it0iMted �r this checklist A 00jided in this svbrrrirtol puckoge, 1 understand that foilure to include di+ necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition_ *The compieted application, ail required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Cornrnun4y Development Department I GIAD Portal: https-//rvpor-tal,colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: C;MDriientservices colliercountyfl_gov Age nr/Gwn'e r S rnat e h` S J Agent/Owner Name (please prin POONG014105 FEMCE/ WALU 01/2023 FURS REGNER 14AR 24 2025 Date Page 3 of 3 Page 63 of 403 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) r 41 -1a � (pdnt value), as tif9e, Ir applicable) of ?rontra= (company, If a Iicable)r SWe3r ar aft�rrriunder oath, that t am the I choose one) owner[K applicanpurchalserEland that. 1. I have full authority to secure the approvals} requested and too impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Lana Development Code, 2- Alt answers to the questions in this applicaaan and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true- 3- 1 have authorized the staff of GoNer County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purposo of investigating and evaluating the request made through this appilcation; and that 4, The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the c&ditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action 5- Well author¢e to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 abova- `Notes: . if Me aPp,ikant is a corporaatforr, then it is usually executed by the cam. pres- or v. Ares- . If the applicant is a Limped Liability Company (L.L C) or Limited Company (L.C-), then the docunvnts should typically be signed by the Company's "Marragh7g Member' ■ if the appi ant is a parfnershfp, than typically a paftfrer can sign on behalf of tJre partnership. • If the applicant is a lirnited partrjefshJp, then the general partner must sign and be lden fed as the general partner' of fife named partnulf: oo . If the appficarrf is a trust, Men they mast rrr ude the bvstea's flame and the words "as kvstee': M each instance, friar determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, parfnershlp, and their use the appropriate €ormof for that cwnemhip. Under penalties of perjury, I dectare that J have read the forogaIng Affidavit of Authorization and that #lee facts stated in it are true_ ��Sla llr�a 'e,'—� -- �y o�:a 91�7- STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The forego) instrurnerlt was acknowleged beore me by nwans of physical pfesenm or El r nllne f-nntarizatiara lhia day f 2Q25, by [pNi ted cradle of owner or quallfler) Such Person(s) 140tary Public Must Check appilcabte box Are personally kr*wrt to me Has prodLrced a airrent drhrers license _��-•.-�--. F05TER RHEINt �•- {-� �• �� • . Nokary Puo-l� • SKate or paanda 8S Qi0d4f0�IJ 1 V , Commi59iot: HH t69a96 as dmtffloatlon, my Canm, tx,�lrrssug 25, Ifl25 Notary Signature: CRU--COA-WI MI ss P L 2 oar 2 4 D O 1 d 0 5 9 F E N r E f H�}1��}L Llg Page 64 of 403 Easement Use Agreement 1 Letters of No Objection PL20240014059 547106' Ave N, Naples, FL 34108 My understanding from Lisa Blacklidge, Manager of Planning Development Review, is that a minor exception to the Easement Use Agreement is required for the 2' wood wall in the Public Utility Basement. The application for the minor exception would be submitted after the fence height variance is approved. Attached are three documents: - A copy of my executed Easement Use Agreement which requires me to remove the wall at my expense should the County request. An email from Orlando Fernandez, Engineer II at FPL, stating that FPL cannot provide a Letter of No Objection for a wall within the Public Utility Easement. - A letter From Orlando Fernandez statingthat FPL has no objection to a fence in the Public Wility Easement, however if FPL needs access to the easement, 1 erg responsihle for removal and re -installation of the fence. - A Letter of No Objection from Xavier Medina at Comcast. PL20 40014059 FENCE 1 WA L THOMAS RIBNER MAR 24 2025 1 c� Page 65 of 403 Owner; Thomas Reigner Living Two Addmsa, 547 106 Ave N lanes R 34108 Permit No- 202 3403 IKA E "NT USE AGREEKEW This EASFMENT USE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made as of this 12m day of August , 20 24 by and between Th meg Reaper I iainn gust ("[owner"), and Collier County ("County") WHEREAS, Owner is the current fee owner of that certain real property kcnown as hulas Park Ueit 6 BLK 76 W ill of Lot 12 r a31 of int 13 according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Rook a l of the Pu6Iic Records 4f Collier County, Florida (hereinafter "Subject Prr pvrty"); and WREPCEAS, as set forth in Plat Book 3 , Page 15 , the County is record owner of certain nun -exclusive _ P.U.E easement rights, as referenced in paragraph 1 of the Plat dedications, a portion of which encumbers the Sul ject Property (hweinafter "Fasoment .Area"); and WHEREAS, Owner has or wishes to construct or hrsmll a TenceMeteinlr* wail (the "Frsu(wftment") in a portion of the Couitty's easement located on Owner's property; and WHEREAS, the County has no present objection to the use of the Encroachment within the Easement Area, provided that Owner UgM to the terms and conditions set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, in considemlion of the sum of S10,00 and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency cf which is hereby acknowledged, Owner hereby agrees as follows- [. The above rceirais am true and correct and are iricorpmated kcrem. '2. Owner shall provide to the Coonzy whatever access the County requires to "n roue its easement rights and further agrees to waivt any claim of damage to the Encroachment arising out of the County's maintenance activities within the Easement AM whether such damage is intentional or unint,eationasl. 3. The County agrees that until otherwise notified, Owner may continue the use of Encroachment within the Easement Area, however, the County reWigs the right, in its sole discretion, to ditmand by written request that the Encrauchrnent be removed from the Ntwmeni Area* which Owner shail do at their solo cost ami expense withim a reasunabl a time from receipt of such regtuwt_ 4. The Encroachment shall be as depicted on the building permit application number ZDZOD8234W filed whir Collier County Growth ManMament DeparlmeztL. and no other conM=ttvn shall be in effect in sas E�ssment_ 3. Owner agrees for him/herself and successors and srssigas that they shall release, indernnify and hold the County harmless for and against any and all obligations, claims. Liabilities, expenses and/or fees (including reasonable attorney's fees aad court casts) including personal injury ar property damage arising out of the use of the Easement Ares by the 4wncr, his/her respet;tive canttuctars, agents, employees or invitees at any time while the Encroachment remains within the Easement Area- Further, Owner, for htmlherseIf, successors and sssigps agrees to release wid hold the County harmless from and against any and all obligations. Oairns. Iiabilities, expenses an.&or Fees (Including reasonable aatomey's fees and court casts} including personal injury or M rty damage arising out of the use of the Easement Area by the County, including but hot limited to, damage which may occur to the Encroachment during the normal operation, maintenance. repair anWor replacement, as applicable, of the Fasemnt Area and)ur the Encroachment atad/or thr; infra,stmaure, which may now or in the future be located within the Easement Area. F L 0 4 0 0 i 4 0 5$ F F N C E I W A L t THOMAS l EUNER BAR �4 2025 EVA - O?w Owner Page 1 0172 Page 66 of 403 6, ni5 Agreemeat shall be recorded at the Owncr's Cxpensu io the OfFciel Rccw&- ofCol liar County, Florida, and 0ai.l be a covonant runit4ng with the land and shall be binding upon the heirs, petsorxal representatives, grantees, assigns and successors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hcrew have executed thix Fasement Use Agreemenf as of the cute first above written. Witne%- 41 Printed ltiame Witness al Address Witness 42 ignifire Witne s #2 Printed )"lame i 44 -& Witness 02 Address OWNER: Owner#1i 5i tare Thomas Regner Using Tryst owner 01 Primed Name State of Florida, County orC7ulIler The foregoing linstnnn nt was acknowWg fore me by means aF phys3ca] presence or ❑onIEnc notarirarion this day of � , 20 � G,f, by Thomas I'legner Livinq Trusl — Such person(s) Notary Public roust check applicable box: 0 Are personally known to ins (alas produced a current drivers license ©Has produced TFotarP c 5ignatur� PR�.'MkED BY; pm� Name Preparers Address Eim PALMM metre Pudic, Sub of Florida �Grlf HN 3480SB aaMrR %am um to xm as irtificstion. Notary Public Printed Name LK)ARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: _ ,,. as designee of the County Manager, pursuant to Agenda Item No. 16..A.25, dated January l4, 2020. E0A One O wnrr CHUM Page 2 0f 2 TROMAS Rf 6MER Page 67 of 403 Wedec,pday. January 22. 207!j at 10:52:31 Eastern Standard Time Subject_ ran, 547 106th AVE N bate: Wednesday, January22. 2025 al 10452:12 AM pastern Stond3rd Tlmc: From, Thomas Regner To: Thomas Bogner Ariaehm�nt$- Imoge001.Jpg, image002•png, image0p3.prig, � m agaU04. png, i magf, 00 5. pn g, Image006.png. image007.prig. irnage008-png. Fence Letter 2[1]-pOf From: Peter Torres <Pfemierfinisb-es5 ,yahoU.ccrn> Date: Thursday, January 16, 2025 at 5:37 PM To: Thomas Regner<tregrtier otggnera47das.�gciates.corri> Su bject: SOnt from Yrahoo Mail for iRhorie Begin forwarded rnessage-. On Thursday, Jantiary 16. 2025. 5:313 PM, Peter Torres < remier5nishes5@sy h�r;em:: Yes Orlando it's only a 2 by 12 wood . I know that some of these people are building Concrete watts there and county is on it, I thank you Seat from Yahoc) Mg[t for iRhgn� On Thursday, January 16. 2025, 4:31 PM. Fernandez, Driando c0dan.(jo-Fernandez a fpLq m> wrote: Peter, I die}, I can add the Some of the wording that the county is requesting but not the "wall" part_ We cannot provide a LON0 for a wall within the easement. See now ketter ottached. Thank you, PL28249014059 FENCE I WAL � INBRAS RIEENER MAR 24 2025 I of Page 68 of 403 i r Fernandez Eny nee r I I Golden Gate Service Center — r P L Cell: 239-367-4156 Email- arlando.fernandeza'[p�.mm PPL L r-0 fl!'-.. Fpf- projact Porw '�L' wSWi"--'0'p Onp A, n �rvoi r;11 eml .1ror., it T?l I If rrvw.' a.p1r, iy ro., iw mr i :le.- I:; -- I.-L 1'J4 4 L&,:; '&J 10 110 J "I-' - Report an Ourallip in You, Amn m FFVm Socirk Daridamg. Irl.1-1 hii"reAnt Prq�em infaftnkmom From- Deter Torres <p re m i erti n i s h e s Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2025 2:19 PM To. Fernandez, Orlando <0f in ndo. Ferri a le > Subject: FEMCE / WA t L' REGNER MAR 24 2825 2 of 3 Page 69 of 403 Ortando I was wondering if got my message for that job 547 106 about the Letter we have of county Sr,n-+r.Qm Yal-on Mai[ rgr jehg PL20 4DO14059 FENCE 1 WAL L THOMN5 REDDER MAR 24 7015 3of3 Page 70 of 403 Fiorlda Power & Ught Company, 410515n' AVE 5W, MAPLES, FL 34126 FPL January 16, 2024 Peter Torres Premier Finishes Inc 2155 Benton Rd Maples, FL 34117 Fence A €ee€nart 547 106' ` AVE MAPLES FL Larne= Peter Torres Thank you for contacting FPL about a 6' fence installation in the public utility easernen#_ FPL has no objection to this fence installation and recommends easily removable fence sections at the access a€ea(s). If access to the easerrent is necessary for any utility work, the homeowner is responsible for the removal and re- installation of the fence_ Prior to any digging you must contact Sunshine State One Call of Florida. Contact them either by telephone tall free at 1-800-432-4770 or by e-mail at ww_calisunshine_cem, forty-eight hours in advance of construction. Sunshine State One Call of Florida will schedule a locator to perform the necessary locates far you at no cost_ If I can be of any further assistance, please contact me at 239-367-4156_ Sincerely, Orlando Fernandez DIS"I'RIBUTION. ENGINEER II FL202 40014059 FFN9E ! WA L � HU AS REGOFR MAR 2.4 0�& A NEXTera ENERGY Company Page 71 of 403 MT February 24, 202.5 Attn: Thomas Regrer IRE- LONG 547 106th Ave N Dear Thomas, Thank you for COntactirig Ccmcast regarding your proposed objection. ThIs Is to infarm. you that Comcast Cable has facilities in the North of PublIL Ut0ity Easement (PUQ. We have no objectlon of the encroar-hrrnent into the easement recorded 547 106th Ave N, Maples, FL, 34108, If Corncast facilities are found and/or damaged within the area as described, the Applicant will bear the cast of repairs of said facilities. If you have any further question or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at If you have any further question or curleerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at (941) 914-7914. sincerely, Manager, ConsrruEtT vn SWFL 12600 Westlinks Dr. Suite 44 Fort Myers, FL 33913 Cell (941) 914-7814 David Lescrynski&Comcos4.corrz PL202AO074059 FENCE / WAS ThOMAS REGNER MAR 74 2A Page 72 of 403 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-72, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did give notice by mail at least 30 days after receipt of letter indicating that the application is sufficient to the following property owners and or condominium and civic associations whose members may be impacted by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a variance or parking: exemption For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change. Per attached letters and or property owner's list, which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. The letters were mailed on April 7. 2025. (Signature of State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this � day of �^ 2025 b who is personally Y� I Y known to me or who has produced r L as identification. (Signs a ofNotary Public) l� Printed Name of Notary (Notary Seal) :A�y 4� 'P THOWSSTEPHENS a" • Wttof FWrida Commission # H% 526550 !Ay Comm. uores May 13, 202/ Page 73 of 403 April 7, 2025 Name Address City, State, Zip Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the sender of this letter has made a formal application to Collier County for a variance from the requirements of the zoning regulations as they apply to the following property: 547 t 061�' Ave N, Naples, FL 34108 Parcel ID 62844600002 As required, this letter has been sent to the owners of all properties within 150 feet of the property requesting the variance. In building a new home on the property, significant fill was required to raise the elevation of the new home to comply with current code. Accordingly, I have filed a Variance Petition Application with the County to allow me to increase the fence height on the property from the permissible height of 6' to 8'. This would be accomplished by installing a 6' fence on top of a 2' retaining wall. I believe that this increase in height is necessary to ensure our respective privacy. To provide you with an opportunity to discuss this matter or any questions that you may have, I have included my contact information below. Please feel free to caLl, email, or mail me at your convenience_ Thankyou. Sincerely, Thomas Regner 553 106'h Ave N Naples, FL 34108 Cell: 609-235-6967 Email: tregner@regnerandassociates.com Page 74 of 403 � Q \_ l c ul ° \ » � Q % Cc m o / \ \ = § $ % LU R q \ % 7 _ % - = e % m E - § o / 2 o-j >± / q 3 E e« = 2 \ e \ / // q ƒ t 7 E- § m » 32 £ - m # / § A = ' 2 e f @ J ± ƒ / k / ƒ � ƒ CO § / / / f / CO I y G= C 3 / 2 2 k / q/ 7 m k 2$ f R ? CD CD CD CD co / / / CD m 7 7 7 7 7 7 ? 2 b b / b / LL 0 Ln � � 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 CDP ( a o VA 3 q 3 q 6 q 3 q S q 3 / m m w a o 0 7 7 7 / � 06 ? 2 t _ A ? .e _ / � � � w 3 CL § f & ro R = « \ / E $ w q ® / ° k ru \ \ . b E 7 O a o m n M CO / / \ / / - q ? \ ƒ / \ / / $ 2 2 2 2 2 g / k ± / / 7 / k / J LL f / ƒ / k ƒ 2 / L ƒ 5 \ 5 q % ® % 6 « § 6 \ \ e % $ a a / J » @ t t g % §¥ 7¥ & U u e U\ e w) 7 e 3 o m o/ m E m 0/ = c a_ G o a- % q k 2 m z ƒ% 2 2 2 2 2 7 2 2 2 2 2 R a k 7 a k k / / / \ k / R k k % \ \ \ 2 CD/ / � / 9 / / CD / / LO to c 00 (D 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 / k k k � k k / Co / \ / / / -i Cl) k k \ k / / / � 2 m _ U 2 � � k § 0 LO � 2 k / % a m Q / / § ® 2 0 $ m � o -j a 2 2 2? m 2 f\\ t « ƒ 3 a e k e \ c $ / / k k2>0 / / / co LL Q LU % ƒ CD \ k 0 = % ƒ Le) / J/ k® O c= > c� r / LA2 7 k ƒ/ z J% k /% » @ 00 » G R R q E ? CD / / / / 11 = m ± @ 3 ( b co b 2 2 2 2 2 CD / k k £ 3 3 - \ / / q k \ / k \ \ 7 e e 2 1' c� w o 5 Z PL � wa a w m Boas W°+y mmmsmm€m® m m QQL � yy W 0 0;;g o 7g'a' m$ s° mmmom O w�o�o of ooe p ¢�poai?arc mZa aa�ozJ m aN mnniWa� yy Pw rcoVoo�z i ��^(UJ OOmarcOU ono m�� f a�aU F � o o �rNw 22 z LL L) - �^ OD oQzo Tf-a LL azdU ? W ICI W z w 5 a WH1O A9 lOOd �O 1111 d b A Sf Z® R g ao � � o NR (n¢ rc El €y' �W �o Q��< �o�€ ga=� r L 9 ssa h= z Noy z wF NwI m¢<tii fAwh ggag� \1 W J z ,T F K fWq o z � '- zo wzo ' i oo a oa3�mo N r. o ¢tea NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 1:00 P.M., June 12, 2025, in the Hearing Examiner's meeting room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104, to consider: PETITION NO. PL20240014059 VA — REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 5.03.02.C.2.B TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED RMF-6 ZONED FENCE HEIGHT FROM 6 FEET TO 8 FEET ON THE NORTH, WEST, AND EAST PROPERTY LINES ON APPROXIMATELY 0.23 ACRES LOCATED AT 547 106TH AVE NORTH, ALSO KNOWN AS WEST'/2 OF LOT 12 AND ALL OF LOT 13, BLOCK 76 OF THE NAPLES PARK UNIT 6 SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one (1) week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Community Development Department, Zoning Division; 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104. Page 79 of 403 As to any petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner may appeal such final action. Such appeal shall be filed per Section 2-88 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances within 30 days of the decision by the Hearing Examiner. An aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision by the Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the approval authorization shall be at their own risk. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/calendar- of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Ray Bellows at 252-2463 or email to Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Zoning Division located at 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr, Naples, Florida 34104, (239) 252- 2400, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida Page 80 of 403 Collier County --��f GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning & Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Hearing Examiner: 547 106th Ave N (VA) Date: 6/12/2025 Petition Type: Variance Time: 01:00 PM Petition No.: PL20240014059 Location: GMCD Conference Room 609/610 Planner Name: Sean Sammon 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-8422 This is to advise you of an upcoming public hearing because you may have interest in the proceedings, or you own property located near the vicinity of the following property. Flamingo AVE Project 110th AVE Heron AVE Location 109th AVE 108th AVE E ret AVE Y 107th AVE Conners AVE 106th AVE N N N N N Seabee vi t Germain' c}c --' net AVE ClhaDR Seagull AVE I_ I �LLLLLL{ 105th AVE N N 104th AVE N 9 103rd AVE N 102nd AVE N For more information, or to register to participate remotely: https://bit.ly/Public_Hearings *Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues For difficulties registering please call Ailyn Padron at (239) 252-5187 or email to ailyn.pad ron@CollierCountyFL.Gov. Meeting information: Individual speakers may be limited to five (5) minutes on any item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the agenda packets must submit materials a minimum of ten (10) days prior to the respective public hearing, to the county staff member noted above. All material used in presentations before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Zoning Division, located at 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104, (239) 252- 2400, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available upon request. This petition and other pertinent information related to this petition is kept on file and may be reviewed at the Growth Management Community Development Department building located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. See reverse for more information Page 81 of 403 Hearing Examiner to consider the following: PETITION NO. PL20240014059 VA — REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 5.03.02.C.2.B TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED RMF-6 ZONED FENCE HEIGHT FROM 6 FEET TO 8 FEET ON THE NORTH, WEST, AND EAST PROPERTY LINES ON APPROXIMATELY 0.23 ACRES LOCATED AT 547 106TH AVE NORTH, ALSO KNOWN AS WEST '/2 OF LOT 12 AND ALL OF LOT 13, BLOCK 76 OF THE NAPLES PARK UNIT 6 SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Page 82 of 403 i r ( a �. Al /54L '.A' per. IT ir , 9 00 'Q r R; O) O co N ,�' k O LL C01 LU h, Ertl. > Qp m �cm Y :A N N Z ;. N N C) CILL CD CL NO 1i t 4„. CU�� p,�o Oa�., Too" r, L!J (� t O C 00 IN NY A Al ;AX� 4,4 fir I q tC�,. ;' !, A '#, 0 May 1, 7025 Collier County Zoning [�--partrnent_ e understand that Thomas Regner has made a formal application to Collier Cou nty fo r a variance for hfs property under construction at 547 1060' Ave N, Naples, FL. We are property owners w thin 150 feet of this address. We also understand that significant fill was required to raise the elevation of the new home to comply with current code. Acrordingiy, Mr. Regner has filed a lfariance Petit#ore Al ppIication with the [aunty to allow h i M to increase the fence Freight are the property from the perm!ssibie height of 5' to 8' to ersur+r privacy for his property and surrounding properties. This would he accomp[is hed 6y installing a 5' fence on top of a 2' retaining omit. Please acCept this niatce aS our support for approval of Mr. Regner s Variance PetRtior; AlppEcatrorr. Thankyou. Sincerely, J 1 4— Micl4al Porernba Susan Roremba 554 146th Ave N, Naples, R c � 1 y l LD.)_J Page 85 of 403 May 1, 2025 Coll lerCounty Zoning ❑epartment: e understand that Thomas Regner has made a formM appLication to Collier County for a variance for his property under construction at 547 1 06s" Ave N, Naples, FL. We are property owners within 150 feet of this address. We also understand that significant fill was required to raise the elevation of the new home to comply lth current code. Accordingly. Mr, Regner has filed a Variance Petition Application with the County to allow him to increase the fence height an the propertyfrcm the permissible height of 6' to 8'to ensure privacyfor his property and surrounding properties. Thiswould be accomplished by installing a 6' fence on top of a 2'retainingwall. Please accept this notice as our supportfor approval of Mr. Regner's Variance Petition Application. Thank you. Since el , J es Ryan Ly Rya 558 106r' Ave N, Naples, FL Page 86 of 403 � �� ' � !.'� ; •7*Jr ,r. .t.:. .C. � � ,t � i s•. r-. � f'; ..' rCr.`r' �i rT �.', f11 �i" � rr .+ rl � � .� � � r� � , � •.. Sri. kk;� ,..k$. �.++:r ; :r �'�"� a.1t;1 1�3 �..,��••��+}{. �.5.,.� •1 ��'�. rah .., .f. �. �'}��'r-J/ �I'�- �] jj�,, 1i,4',f, i�1.1 r:. • a �-u '► - ; ! 14 k :•. i �il I t p i ,rid a, di.)'� � �1. � .+�__.Jl '{.L'r ✓,� �� rJ I Rio h� ".-' 7. r1 ��i�'�r C✓I ��rfi�':, fir {� °H+iLiV'YF' �rh�+�a'ai7fi•f'�.__1kY L}� iLi/ia..f�!/ [ill lLll 'i'I TN �.} rc �ll��•t r Yf}5, f15i1f+}�y` r�}�� TJJ`j� �� r1w`�- .�i.�• L/ c� r�� 7�u�F�.1 Gar,+,r �f� "l lL r., �l .".1-.�.�z+ J ✓6 4 _ f r ,-d ��;:� r�F r+��1� �•:.�.A .w..114� "�. ��+.{s.:�A r^7 .rf � t�i.i:.11� 'f'! �{iL FIL'.:-_f.1. �� ?�� `%eJi«�1r u �• ,5.� ��__+rr' Pei. ld�� s.�,h FfJLih iti �f-'f�"1i« ".! i wJ r..Y:A� f.:f`..�.'��#•' i1..`+I x"`. /.+} T�'-'r'�+� r. �c.n;, I_.�,t "T ',1��;.;� 7{y yy ]('� J� �{ r i[ �� j � ��* 7I" ,,r� �n ip� � l `�+�w+�'.C� ll'fSJ ��G. ..� 1 i if ti.f'-J4' iF.{.4. rL -y ➢l- IT7;iWi.l4J7~ i ; ..� J 1•. �rrti" �• � {S, f j d i. i al�/�F"[� Yy�f'i +q�, •i r-fw x.�-.H-•Y ,r`-- +y_-x��..r 5 t L Ja I-rF I��..kl �•� �..G �� .� �. �+� `�' I.; '-.,. � r: 4 '7 �.+� . Page 87 of 403 6/12/2025 Item # 3.13 ID# 2025-1800 PETITION NO. CU-PL20230006785 — intersection of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Crews Road - One Life Church Naples, Inc., pursuant to Sections 2.03.0I.B.l.c.1 and 2.03.02.B.1.c.1. of the Collier County Land Development Code, requests a Conditional Use to allow a ±25,000 square foot, 400 seat church on lands zoned Estates (E) and Residential Multi-Family-6 (RMF-6(3)). The subject 14.88f acre property is in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Crews Road in Sections 8 and 17, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Planner III] Commission District 1 ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report - One Life Church of Naples Attachment A - Master Site Plan Attachment B - Conditions of Approval Attachment C - FLUE Consistency Memorandum Attachment D - Backup Materials Attachment E - Hearing Advertising Signs Page 88 of 403 'S__-01 Collier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: JUKE 12, 2025 SUBJECT: CU-PL20230006785 - ONE LIFE CHURCH OF NAPLES PROPERTY OWNER/AGENTS: Owner: One Life Church Naples, Inc. 3960 Radio Road, Ste 105 Naples, FL 34104 Agents: Brooks Witcher Fort Construction Group of Naples, Inc 28290 Old 41 Rd, Unit 16 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 REQUESTED ACTION: Alexis Crespo, AICP RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Suite 305 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 The petitioner requests that the Hearing Examiner consider a Conditional Use for One Life Church, Inc., pursuant to Sections 2.03.0l.B.l.c.1 and 2.03.02.B.1.c.1. of the Collier County Land Development Code requesting a Conditional Use to allow a 25,000± square foot, 400 seat church on lands zoned Estates (E) and Residential Multi -Family (RMF-6(3)). The property is in two zoning districts: E and RMF-6(3), where churches are permitted as conditional uses. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject 14.88 ± acre property is in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Crews Road in Section 8, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the location map and conceptual site plan on the following three pages) CU-PL20230006785, One Life Church of Naples Page 1 of 9 May 20, 2025 Page 89 of 403 I Z LU 0 dr%18 exq�eg ewes -- - Q ® Q j G J I ® ow W J � w asun d J A] C ❑;118 t rg.re8 Ulu r., {livi" -Trgarl r;urs �a 41 'w �` li) 0 kn c� c � �¢ C N � N � a CD a J u .'-�., a� vrA E aCd D_ +r CL �] U ca D O p o }, v C3 0 J co 0 0 0 rn m ca a_ CU-PL20230006785, One Life Church of Naples May 20, 2025 Page 2 of 9 s 911111 enn� • ' � 1911111 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of this petition is to obtain Conditional Use (CU) approval for a 25,000± square -foot church with a maximum of 400 seats on a vacant 14.88± acre property. The subject parcel is roughly divided between two zoning districts, Estates (E) and Residential Multi -Family RMF-6(3). Churches are permitted as conditional uses in Estates (E) per LDC Section 2.03.01.B.l.c.1 and Residential Multi -Family RMF-6(3) per (LDC Section 2.03.02.B.1.c.1.) The church has agreed to a list of common conditions of approval, which are included as Attachment B. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: Undeveloped land, with a current zoning designation of Falling Waters PUD (4.95 DU/AC), which is approved for single and multi -family residential dwelling units East: Santa Barbara Boulevard, a six -lane arterial roadway, then Christ the King Presbyterian Church with a current zoning designation of Agricultural (A) zoning district. To the South of the church is land dedicated to preserves. To the south of these preserves, multi- family dwelling units are currently being developed, with a current zoning designation of Santa Barbara -Whitaker RPUD (10 DU/AC), which is approved for multifamily residential dwelling units. South: Whitaker Woods, a multifamily residential development with a current zoning designation of Residential Multi -Family (RMF-6) District, then Whitaker Rd (local CU-PL20230006785, One Life Church of Naples Page 3 of 9 May 20, 2025 Page 91 of 403 road), then undeveloped land with a current zoning designation of Youth Haven PUD that is approved for group care facilities West: Undeveloped land, Sheldon Lane (local road), was developed with single-family dwelling units zoned Estates (E) District. Source: RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The current zoning is Estates (E) and Residential Multi -Family (RMF-6). The intent is to develop the property for church use, featuring a 25,000- square-foot worship facility with 400 seats. Lands within urban -designated areas allow for specific non-residential uses, including community facilities such as churches, as listed in the Urban Designation description within the FLUE in section I.b.4. Based on the above analysis, staff finds the subject petition consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. (See Attachment C — FLUE Consistency Memorandum) Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicants' April 25, 2024, Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2024 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). CU-PL20230006785, One Life Church of Naples May 20, 2025 Page 4 of 9 Page 92 of 403 Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states. "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links, the project traffic is significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition, the proposed development is projected to generate a total of 40+/- PM peak hour, two-way trips on the adjacent roadway segments of Santa Barbara Parkway. The trips generated by this development will occur on the following adjacent roadway link: Link/Roadway Link 2024 AUIR Current Peak 2024 LOS Hour Peak Remaining Direction Capacity Volume/Peak Direction 79.0/ Santa Barbara Davis Blvd. to B 3,100/South 1,637 Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Rd CU-PL20230006785, One Life Church of Naples Page 5 of 9 May 20, 2025 Page 93 of 403 Based on the TIS and the 2024 AUIR, the subject CU is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. The Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) indicates that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Stormwater Review: The proposed conditional use request is not anticipated to create drainage problems or adverse stormwater management impacts to surrounding properties in the area. The site is not currently covered by a South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Environmental Resource Permit (ERP). However, this will be required before any proposed land use or development change. That process will ensure consistency with all applicable state standards for stormwater systems. In addition, site development approval (SDP and/or Plat) will be required from Collier County to ensure that local development standards are maintained and that proposed stormwater system(s) are designed to be consistent with relevant LDC and County Ordinances for water quality and water quantity, during both the interim construction phase and final implementation. Landscape Review: The conceptual site plan depicts that the proposed project meets or exceeds the landscape buffering and wall requirements. Utility Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the South County Water Reclamation Facility wastewater service area of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (CCWSD). Water and wastewater services are available via existing infrastructure within the adjacent right-of-way. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. Any improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the Conditional Use petition to address environmental concerns. The property is devoid of native vegetation; the existing trees onsite do not meet the native vegetation preservation requirements of LDC Section 3.05.07.A. As such, no preservation of native vegetation is required. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) wildlife data indicates the presence of Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) in the area. A black bear management plan must be included in the PPL or SDP review. This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Environmental Services staff recommend approval of the proposed petition. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site is 14.8 acres. The property does not contain native vegetation; no preservation is required. CU-PL20230006785, One Life Church of Naples May 20, 2025 Page 6 of 9 Page 94 of 403 ANALYSIS: When considering a Conditional Use petition, the Hearing Examiner must make a finding that approval of the Conditional Use: 1) will not adversely affect the public interest; 2) will not adversely affect uses of surrounding properties; 3) the petitioner has met any specific requirements pertaining to the conditional use; and 4) satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following matters, where applicable: 1. Sections 2.03.01.B.I.c.1 and 2.03.02.B.1.c.1, of the LDC permits conditional uses in the Estates (E) and Residential Multi-Family-6 (RMF-6(3)) Districts. A church is permitted as a conditional use in the Estates (E) zoning district (LDC 2.03.01.B.l.c.1) and permitted as a conditional use in the Residential Multi-Family-6 (RMF- 6(3) zoning district (LDC 2.03.02.B.1.c.1) provided that the procedures and requirements of LDC 10.08.00 are satisfactorily completed. As discussed below, the proposed project satisfies the requirements of 10.08.00. In the RMF-6(3) Zoning District, the maximum density is three (3) units per acre. 2. Consistency with the Land Development Code (LDC) and the Growth Management Plan (GMP). This request is consistent with the GMP and with the conditions proposed by staff; this project will be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Land Development Code (LDC). 3. Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. Ingress and egress to the subject property will utilize primary access on Crews Road and Whitaker Road, as shown on the master plan. Additional operational impacts for the facility will be reviewed at the time of the Plat or Site Development Plan (SDP). The TIS submitted by the applicant indicates that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period, as noted above, and will not adversely impact the surrounding roadway network. Crews Road will be constructed and repaired along the development's frontage to the access connection on Santa Barbara pavement, meeting Collier County's minimum rural cross-section standards. Moreover, according to LDC Section 4.05.04, Table 17, Parking Space Requirements, the minimum parking requirements for a church are three parking spaces for every seven seats in the chapel or assembly area. The church will have 400 seats; therefore, 172 parking spaces will be required. In addition to this requirement, the associated office use will require four spaces, the recreation use will require 31 spaces, and ADA parking will require seven spaces. The combined total parking requirement of all these uses for this church is 207 spaces. The conditional use site plan shows that 252 spaces will be provided; therefore, this petition shows compliance with the parking LDC requirement. CU-PL20230006785, One Life Church of Naples Page 7 of 9 May 20, 2025 Page 95 of 403 4. The effect the Conditional Use would have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects. The subject site is currently zoned Estates (E) and Residential Multi-Family-6 (3) zoning districts. It is surrounded to the north and west by vacant land. To the east, it is developed with a church, and to the south, it is developed with a multifamily residential. The only proposed outdoor activity will be a small outdoor playground for children. The other proposed uses and activities will be conducted inside the building. Furthermore, outdoor lighting for the parking areas will be designed to reduce light spillage beyond the property lines. Traditionally, churches do not reduce property values, nor will the church emit any noxious odors. Any outdoor event will require a temporary use permit. Noise complaints received by the Code Enforcement Office will be investigated and may result in further Temporary Use Permits being denied. As such, the proposed use should have minimal impact on neighboring properties in terms of noise, glare, economic, or odor effects. 5. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other properties in the district. With setbacks that meet LDC requirements and required landscape buffering that meets or exceeds code requirements, neighboring properties will have an aesthetically appealing view of the property. If the proposed Conditions of Approval are adopted, the proposed church can be compatible with adjacent properties and other properties in the immediate area. Based on the above findings, this conditional use should be recommended for approval, subject to the stipulations outlined in this staff report. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted an NIM on March 3, 2025, at Christ the King Presbyterian Church located at 5510 Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples, FL, which began at 5:30 p.m. Thirty-eight public members attended. The applicant made a brief PowerPoint presentation of the project. One question was asked about when the church will break ground, to which the applicant responded that the church is hopeful to begin construction in the 3rd quarter of this year. Another question was asked about whether anything could occur beyond the outlined development and site plan, to which the applicant responded that the construction would appear as shown on the site plan. The applicant would need to file a new conditional use permit to expand the church's use beyond what was initially described. No commitments were made. A copy of the NIM advertisement, sign -in sheet, NIM summary, and PowerPoint presentation is included in the backup materials (Attachment D). COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed the staff report on 5/20/2025. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve Petition CU - PL20230006785, subject to the following conditions of approval, which are included in Attachment B. CU-PL20230006785, One Life Church of Naples May 20, 2025 Page 8 of 9 Page 96 of 403 Conditions of Approval 1. The One Life Church Conditional Use shall be depicted on the Master Site Plan revised 4/4/2025, prepared by Fort Construction Group of South Florida, Inc., and is limited to a floor area of 25,000 S.F. and a maximum of 400 seats. 2. The conditional use is limited to a 400-seat church with up to 300 members. 3. The church office's hours of operation are limited to 8:00 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Sunday. Church and related services are limited to 8:00 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Sundays and 5:00 p.m. to 9 p.m. for nightly meetings. Additional services provided on Christian Holidays (e.g., Good Friday and Christmas Eve Service) are not limited. 4. The church functions will include two (2) congregations/Sunday services and one (1) youth group. 5. Childcare is limited to the supervision of church members' children during Sunday services. Schools and/or daycare centers use is expressly prohibited. 6. Development of the site is limited to one (1) principal structure, not to exceed 25,000 square feet. 7. Crews Road will be constructed and repaired by the property owner at its sole expense along the development's frontage to provide vehicular connection to the Santa Barbara Blvd. pavement. It will meet Collier County minimum rural cross-section standards before issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. 8. The maximum total daily trip generation for the CU shall not exceed 40 two-way PM peak hour net trips and 884 two-way Sunday trips, based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. Complete Trip Generation information. 9. For services and other periods and events of significant traffic generation, as determined by Collier County staff, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement -approved service provider as directed by Collier County staff, with staffing and at location(s) as directed by the Collier County Transportation Administrator or his designee. Attachments: Attachment A — Master Site Plan Attachment B — Conditions of Approval Attachment C — FLUE Consistency Memorandum Attachment D — Backup Materials Attachment E — Sign Photos CU-PL20230006785, One Life Church of Naples Page 9 of 9 May 20, 2025 Page 97 of 403 FORT UCTION GROUP OF NAPLES INC. ONE LIFE CHURCH — CU-PL20230006785 Conditions of Approval REVISED APRIL 2025 1. The One Life Church Conditional Use shall be depicted on the Master Site Plan revised 4/4/2025, prepared by Fort Construction Group of South Florida, Inc. and is limited to a floor area of 25,000 S.F. and a maximum of 400 seats. 2. The conditional use is limited to a 400-seat church with up to 300 members. 3. Hours of operation for the church office are limited to 8:00 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Sunday. Church and related services are limited to 8:00 a.m. to 1 p.m. Sundays, and 5:00 p.m. to 9 p.m. for nightly meetings. Additional services provided on Christian Holidays (i.e. Good Friday, Christmas Eve Service) are not limited. 4. The church functions will include two (2) congregations/Sunday services and one (1) youth group. 5. Childcare is limited to supervision of church members' children during Sunday services. Schools and/or day care center uses are expressly prohibited. 6. Development of the site is limited to one (1) principal structure not to exceed 25,000 SF. 7. Crews Road will be constructed and repaired by the property owner at its sole expense along the development's frontage to provide vehicular connection to the Santa Barbara Blvd. pavement and will meet Collier County minimum rural cross-section standards prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. 8. The maximum total daily trip generation for the CU shall not exceed 40 two-way PM peak hour net trips, and 884 two-way Sunday trips, based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. Complete Trip Generation information. 9. For services and other periods and events of significant traffic generation, as determined by Collier County staff, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement -approved Page 99 of 403 service provider as directed by Collier County staff, with staffing and at location(s) as directed by the Collier County Transportation Administrator or his designee. Page 100 of 403 ,_.," Collier County CONSISTENCY MEMORANDUM TO: Tim Finn, Planner II, Zoning Services Growth Management Community Development FROM: Jessica Malloy, Planner II, Comprehensive Planning Section Growth Management Community Development DATE: May 16, 2025 SUBJECT: PL20230006785; One Life Church of Naples (CU) REQUEST: To obtain a Conditional Use (CU) on a +14.55 -acre site in the Estates (E) and Residential Multi -Family (RMF-6) zoning districts for a church. LOCATION: The subject site is located on three lots between Crews Road and Whitaker Road, two of which are facing the west frontage of Santa Barbara Boulevard in Section 8, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. Parcel Numbers: 404280002, 426680004, 404240000. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property is designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The current zoning is Estates (E) and Residential Multi -Family (RMF-6). The stated intent is to develop the property for a church use featuring a 24,000 square foot worship facility with 400 seats. Lands within urban -designated areas allow for certain non-residential uses, including community facilities such as churches, as listed in the Urban Designation description within the FLUE in section I.b.4. Certain applicable Future Land Use Element (FLUE) policies are shown as follows in italics followed by staff analysis in bold text. FLUE Policy 5.6 (shown below in italics) followed by staff analysis in [bracketed bold text]. New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). [Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning staff as part of their review of the petition.] Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The property is fronting Santa Barbara Boulevard on the eastern boundary and features two points of access, primarily via Growth Management Community Development • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • www.colliercounMfl.gov/ Page 101 of 403 Crews Road. An additional means of access is provided via Whitaker Road. Both roads directly connect to Santa Barbara Boulevard. The Whitaker Road access allows for further alternate routes to County Barn Road.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [The need to provide internal accesses and loop roads applies to developments of greater intensity and is not applicable to this use.] Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [The adjacent properties at the time of writing of this memorandum are vacant. The potential to provide interconnection points with abutting properties will be evaluated upon any future development requiring a development order or zoning action.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [This policy, in part, would not apply to this project; however, church assembly areas have the potential to serve as civic facilities for meeting spaces, elections, and other activities and/or events in direct relation to the surrounding residential neighborhood uses.] CONCLUSION: Based on the above analysis, staff finds the subject petition consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. PETITION ON CITYVIEW Growth Management Community Development • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • www.colliercounMfl.gov/ Page 102 of 403 ONE LIFE CHURCH Conditional Use Application Hearing Examiner Hearing Package June 12, 2025 PREPARED FOR: One Life Church Naples, Inc SUBMITTED TO: Collier County, Zoning Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Page 103 of 403 PL20230006785 - ONE LIFE CHURCH HEX Package Cont P_nfC Coversheet - Checklist Application Narrative of Conditional Use request Property Ownership and General Description of Site Affidavit of Representation N I M Information Traffic Memorandum Environmental Data Proposed Conditions of Approval Boundary Survey Supporting Information Proposed Conditions Master Site Plan Zoning Verification Page 104 of 403 RVi PL20230006785 - ONE LIFE CHURCH COVERSHEET - CHECKLIST HEX Package Page 105 of 403 Cofer County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov Collier County Planning Commission Agenda Packet Checklist for PUDs to be submitted by Applicants and Agents Please provide the following documents to support your petition request: Materials provided by Planner: • Staff Report • Complete Draft Ordinance /Resolution initialed by County Attorney Materials to be provided by applicant: ZApplication • Narrative of rezone request • Property Information • Property Ownership and general description of site ZDisclosure of Interest /A Affidavit of Unified Control ZAffidavit of Representation ZNIM Information (Sign -in sheet, notes, minutes and/or summary, audio or video recording) ZTraffic Impact Study (TIS) Environmental Data /A Historical/Archeological Survey or Waiver /A Utility Letter /A Deviation Justifications ZBoundary Survey /A Amended PUD Ordinance (the last submitted Ordinance with strikethrough — color preferred) ❑ Other documents (as needed, on a case -by -case basis) such as relevant prior ordinances, conditional uses, historical documents, any "private or legal" agreements affecting the PUD etc. Write details below. Proposed Conditions, Master Site Plan, Zoning Verification l understand that by submitting the above materials, it is the agent/applicant's responsibility to ensure ali materials are in the same order for all copies of backup materials to provide to the CCPC and the Ca must contain the documents in one pdf file {not multiple files) in the same order as the printed materials. 1t is the agent's responsibility to ensure no documentation is left out. 1��' Signature of Agent Representative 5/8/2025 Printed ame of Signing Agent Representative 5/8/2025 Date 09/2022 Page 1 of 1 Page 106 of 403 RVi PL20230006785 - ONE LIFE CHURCH COMPLETED APPLICATION HEX Package Page 107 of 403 Need Help? Co per County Growth Management Community Development Department GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides Application for Public Hearing for Conditional Use LDC subsection 10 Chapter 3 of the Administrative Code ❑ A CONDITIONAL USE TO BE HEARD BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ❑� A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE TO BE HEARD BY THE OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): One Life Church Naples, Inc. Name of Applicant if different than owner: Fort Construction Group of Naples, Inc. Address: 28290 Old 41 Rd Unit 16 Telephone. 239-301-4947 Cell: City: Bonita Springs State: FL Zip: 34135 E-Mail Address: Brooksw@fcgflorida.com Name of Agent(s): Brooks Witcher Firm: Fort Construction Group of Naples, Inc. Address: 28290 Old 41 Rd Unit 16 Telephone: 239-301-4947 Cell: Fax: City: Bonita Springs State: FL Zip: 34135 E-Mail Address: Brooksw@fcgflorida.com Fax: BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. Revised 2023 Page 1 of 12 Page 108 of 403 Need Help? Co per County Growth Management Community Development Department ASSOCIATIONS GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permittina Guides Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: PROPERTY INFORMATION On separate page, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Property I.D. Number: 00404280002, 00404240000, 00426680004 Plat Book: Page #: Section/Township/Range: 17 / 50 / 26 Subdivision: Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds Description: 8 50 26 W1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 5 AC OR 443 PG 381 Size of Property: ft. X ft. = Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 15+/- Address/ General Location of Subject Property: Southwest corner of Santa Barbara/Crews Road Revised 2023 Page 2 of 12 Page 109 of 403 Need Help? Co per County Growth Management Community Development Department ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides Zoning Land Use N Falling Waters PUD PUD preserve S Youth Haven PUD, RMF-6 PUD preserve, multi -family E ROW Santa Barbara Blvd. W RMF-6 Multi -family, single-family and vacant property If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property: (If space is inadequate, attach on a separate page) Section/Township/Range: 17 / 50 / 26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page # Metes & Bounds Description: _ Property I.D. Number: 00404280002, 00404240000, 00426680004 17 50 26 W1/2 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS S 30 FT CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST DETAIL Type of Conditional Use: This application is requesting a conditional use as allowed, pursuant to LDC section 2.03.00, of the EE, RMF-6 zoning district for Churches (type of use). Present Use of the Property: Vacant Revised 2023 Page 3 of 12 Page 110 of 403 ADDITIONAL PARCEL DATA Section/Township/Range: 8/50/26 Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: 00404240000 Metes & Bounds Description: 8 50 26 E1/2 OF SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 5 AC. Page 3b of 12 Page 111 of 403 Need Help? Co per County Growth Management Community Development Department EVALUATION CRITERIA GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides Pursuant to LDC section 10.08.00 and Chapter 3 CA of the Administrative Code, staff's recommendation to the reviewing body shall be based upon a finding that the granting of the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and that the specific requirements governing the individual conditional use, if any, have been met. Further, satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning the following matters, where applicable. On a separate page, provide a narrative statement describing a request for a conditional use and a detailed response to the criteria listed below. Specify how and why the request is consistent with each of the criteria. a. Describe how the project is consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan. Include information on how the request is consistent with the applicable section or portions of the Future Land Use Element. b. Describe the existing or planned means of ingress and egress to the property and proposed structure thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. c. Describe the effect the conditional use will have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic impact, and odor. d. Describe the site's and the proposed use's compatibility with adjacent properties and other properties in the district. e. Please provide any additional information which you may feel is relevant to this request. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? N/A Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ No ❑■ Yes (If yes please provide copies.) Revised 2023 Page 4 of 12 Page 112 of 403 Need Help? Co per County Growth Management Community Development Department GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Fort Construction Group of Naples, Inc Address: 28290 Old 41 Rd Unit 16 City: Bonita springs State: FL Telephone: 239-301-4947 Cell: E-Mail Address: brooksw@fcgflorida.com Address of Subject Property (If available): City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34112 LEGAL DESCRIPTIOIN' Section/Township/Range: 8 J1 50 / 26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Metes & Bounds Description: Check applicable system: Fax: ZIP: 34135 Property I.D. Number: 00404280002, 00404240000, 00426680004 PE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System X❑ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name:. d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ (GPD Capacity): e. Septic System ❑ Collier County 16 MGD TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System 0 b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ PROVIDE NAME Collier County d. Private System (Well) ❑ Total Population to be served: 400 Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 2184 Average Daily: B. Sewer -Peak: 5,288 Average Daily: We 1 1200 Revised 2023 Page 5 of 12 Page 113 of 403 Co per County Growth Management Community Development Department Need Help? GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permittina Guides If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: 12/6/2025 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Project will be tied into public sewer system County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. Revised 2023 Page 6 of 12 Page 114 of 403 Co per County Growth Management Community Development Department Need Help? GMCD Public Portal Online Pavment Guide E-Permitting Guides RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of F.S. §695. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the assigned Principal Planner, Zoning Services Department, within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. Revised 2023 Page 7 of 12 Page 115 of 403 Co per County Growth Management Community Development Department Need Help? GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ A Conditional Use to be heard by the Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals ❑ A Minor Conditional Use to be heard by the Office of the Hearing Examiner Chapter 3 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. Requirements for Review Required Not Required Completed Application ® ❑ Cover letter briefly explaining the project Li Pre -Application Notes Li Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized ® ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist ® ❑ Property Ownership Disclosure Form ® ❑ Warranty Deed(s) ❑ Boundary Survey a✓ Conceptual Site Plan 24" X 36" plus (one 8 % X 11 copy) ✓ Plans showing proposed location for utilities, if required Plans for screening and buffering the use with reference as to type, dimensions, and character, if required ❑ ❑ Plans showing the proposed landscaping and provisions for trees protected by County regulations, if required ID ❑ Plans showing the proposed signs and lighting, including type, dimensions, and if required El Elcharacter, Architectural Rendering of Proposed Structure(s), if applicable ✓ ❑ Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. ❑ ❑ Statement of utility provisions (with all required attachments & sketches) _ Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 `/ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearing. ❑ Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. Traffic Impact Study (TIS) or waiver 0 Historical and Archeological Survey, or waiver El — Electronic copy of all documents and plans ❑ ❑ Revised 2023 Page 8 of 12 Page 116 of 403 Need Help? Co per County Growth Management Community Development Department ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the followine additional reviewers: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Emergency Management or EMS: ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: ❑ GMD Graphics ❑ City of Naples: ❑ Utilities Engineering: y ❑ Parks and Recreation: ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ Other: ❑ School District (Residential Components): Communication Towers: ❑ I Mosquito Control ❑ I Collier County Airport Authority ❑ I Naples Airport Authority Commercial Mining: ❑ Impact Fees Revised 2023 Page 9 of 12 Page 117 of 403 CQ 7eT C014"ty Growth Management Community Development Department FEE REQUIREMENTS Need Help? GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides i Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 (to be credited towards the application fee if the application is filed within 9 months of pre -application meeting) Conditional Use Application Fee: $4,000.00 When filed with Rezone Petition: $1,500.00 In Additional fee for 51 and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee L Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $300.00 Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 L. Listed or Protected Species survey review fee (when an EIS Is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Fee, if required: Methodology Review Fee: $500.00 * Minor Study Review Fee: $750.00 * Major Study Review Fee: $1,500.00 Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Hearing Examiner or CCPC: $1,125.00 Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the BZA, If required: $500.00 Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition, U269� WG�.��I,QiL Agent/Owner Signature Brooks Witcher Agent/Owner Name (please print) 6/14/2024 Date Revised 2023 Page 10 of 12 Page 118 of 403 Co per County Growth Management Community Development Department Public Participation Requirements LDC Section 10.03.06 B. or C. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code Notice for Minor Conditional Use Petitions Need Help? GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permittina Guides Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Requirements: Applicant must conduct a NIM at least 15 days prior to the Hearing Examiner's receipt of the staff report and application materials in accordance with the applicable sections of the Administrative Code. The NIM shall be advertised and a mailed written notice shall be given to the property owners in the notification area at least 15 days prior to the NIM meeting. Mailed Notice: Written notice shall be sent to property owners in the notification area at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing. Newspaper Advertisements: The legal advertisement shall be published at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing in a newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement shall include at a minimum: Date, time, and location of the hearing; Description of the proposed land uses; and 2 in. x 3 in. map of the project location. Sign: A sign shall be posted at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing date. Public Hearing for Minor Conditional Use Petitions Hearing Examiner: The Hearing Examiner shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing. See Chapter 9 of the Administrative Code for the Office of the Hearing Examiner procedures. Notice for Conditional Use Petitions Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Requirements: Applicant must conduct a NIM at least 15 days prior to the advertised public hearing. The NIM shall be advertised and a mailed written notice shall be given to the property owners in the notification area at least 15 days prior to the NIM meeting. Revised 2023 Page 11 of 12 Page 119 of 403 Mailed Notice: Written notice shall be sent to property owners in the notification area at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing. Newspaper Advertisements: The legal advertisement shall be published at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing in a newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement shall include at a minimum: • Date, time, and location of the hearing; • Description of the proposed land uses; and • 2 in. x 3 in. map of the project location. Sign: A sign shall be posted at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing date. Public Hearing for Conditional Use Petitions Environmental Advisory Committee (EAC): The EAC shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing, if required. Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC): The CCPC shall hold at least 1 public hearing. Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA): The BZA shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing. Revised 2023 Page 12 of 12 Page 120 of 403 PL20230006785 - ONE LIFE CHURCH COVER LETTER & NARRATIVE HEX Package Page 121 of 403 F RT TION GROUP OFNAPLES INC. PARKWAY LIFE CHURCH — CU-PL20230006785 STATEMENT NARRATIVE REVISED FEBRUARY 2025 This application requests conditional use approval for a 400-seat church (place of worship) on an approximately 14.55+/- acre parcel of land located at the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Crews Road. The site is zoned EE, as well as RMF-6 District and the LDC, Section 2.03.01.B.1.c.1 as well 2.03.02.B.1.c.1, identifies that a church is permitted as a Conditional Use in this zoning district. A Conditional Use Site Plan has been prepared in support of the application, which depicts the general location of the church building, parking areas, open spaces, and access locations. Perimeter buffers surround the site and meet the LDC. The site is planned to have the primary access to Crews Road, with a secondary access to Sunset Whitaker Road. The site contains no native vegetative habitat; therefore, no native vegetation preserve areas are depicted on the Conditional Use Site Plan. The site will connect to Collier County Utilities for potable water and sanitary sewer services. The Conditional Use Site Plan identifies an approximate area for a sewer tie in as well as potable and non -potable tie in locations. Of note, the Applicant proposes to utilize relatively small portion of the site for development in the far northeast corner to mitigate impacts to residential uses to the west. A. Describe how the project is consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan. Include information on how the request is consistent with the applicable section or portions of the Future Land Use Element. The property is located in the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Sub -District of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan. The Urban Designated lands specifically permit non-residential community facility uses such as churches. Policy 5.4 of the FLUE requires that all applications and petitions for proposed development must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. This Conditional Use for a church is consistent with the FLUE of the Plan. Policy 5.6 requires new developments to be compatible with, and complementary to the surrounding land uses. The property is bounded on three sides by roadways: Santa Barbara Boulevard, Crews Road and Whitaker Road. The Conditional Use Site Plan for the proposed church outlines the planned perimeter buffers. As noted on the site plan, the applicant proposes to install a 10-foot-wide Type D buffer along Crews Road, which is the northern boundary of the site. The southern boundary will also feature a Type D buffer, while the eastern boundary will have a 15-foot-wide Type D buffer, and the western boundary will be equipped with a 15-foot-wide Type B buffer. Additionally, the church building is located more than 100 feet from the right-of-way line of Crews Road. All proposed development is sensitively clustered along Santa Barbara Blvd. to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. 28290 Old 41 Road N. I Suite 16 1 Bonita Springs, FI. 34135 1 P: 239.301.4947 1 F: 239.301.4953 Page 122 of 403 It is important to note that the proposed conditions for Conditional Use limit the property to certain days of service and types of events. Church services will be held on Sundays and Wednesday evenings. The Applicant is not requesting a school or daycare center use as defined in the LDC as part of the proposed conditions. Due to the limited nature of its operations, the overall intensity of the site is expected to be relatively low, resulting in minimal impact on surrounding properties and infrastructure. Policy 6.1.1 Establishes the minimum preservation areas for residential and mix -use projects as 25% of the on -site native preservation. The site is primarily covered with a large amount of exotic nuisance vegetation, with no native vegetation found onside; preservation is not required and the project meets the CCME Policy 6.1.1 requirements. Objective 7.1 Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. (The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A-27.003, 68A- 27.004, and 68A-27.005, F.A.C. and those species designated by various federal agencies as Endangered and Threatened species published in 50 CFR 17.) This project site is currently surrounded by either roadway or development. The parcel is strategically situated with distinct boundaries, including a canal along its eastern edge, which serves as a natural waterway. To the south and north, the parcel is bordered by roadway access, facilitating transportation and connectivity. On the eastern side of the parcel, adjacent to the canal, is Santa Barbara Boulevard, a major thoroughfare that enhances the parcel's visibility and accessibility. To the south, the surrounding infrastructure includes Whitaker Road, contributing to the overall connectivity of the area. Meanwhile, to the west, there exists a vacant parcel of land, which could present future development opportunities or open space. A thorough review of the property was conducted, accompanied by a survey focused on listed species in the area. The findings revealed no signs of endangered, threatened, or species of concern residing on the parcel. Furthermore, it is important to note that this parcel is not situated within a USFWS Panther Consultation Zone, alleviating potential concerns related to the conservation of this species. Overall, the property appears to be in a suitable condition for various uses without significant ecological restrictions. Policy 7.1 requires connections to fronting County arterial and collector streets. Based on discussions with Collier County Transportation Planning Staff, the preferred access to the site is the local street known as Crews Road. Right and left turn lanes were installed on Santa Barbara Boulevard at Crews Road as part of the widening improvements several years ago. Utilizing the existing turn lanes is more appropriate than installing another driveway and turn lane on Santa Barbara Boulevard. Connection is also planned to the southern access point on Whitaker Road where utilities can be easily accessed and provide sufficient offloading from the site if necessary. Page 123 of 403 Policy 7.2 The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The project includes primary and secondary access in accordance with this policy. Furthermore, the traffic analysis provided by TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. indicates that the expected trip generation does not require the installation of traffic signals and the proposed use will have minimal impact on the surrounding roadway network. Policy 7.3 All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection point with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. Due to the proposed use of the site, the connection between the church and surrounding developments would not be suitable. Should internal connectivity be provided, it could potentially lead to unexpected usage or disturbances in surrounding residential areas. Additionally, the applicant is proposing roadway pavement improvements along Crews Rd between Santa Barbara Rd and site access improving this segment to County standards. Policy 7.4 The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. Due to the non-residential nature of the development, this policy is not applicable since the site is proposing a single use as a place of worship. However, the provision of open space exceeds the minimum requirements outlined in the County's land development regulations. B. Describe the existing or planned means of ingress and egress to the property and proposed structure thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. As mentioned throughout the application, primary access to the site will be from Crews Road, with secondary access from Whitaker Road. Turn lanes are currently in place on Santa Barbara Boulevard, providing traffic relief and safe access to Crews Rd and Whitaker Rd. The internal driveways will be designed to accommodate emergency vehicle access. According to the traffic analysis provided by TR Transportation Consultants, Inc., both Crews Road and Whitaker Road have a sufficient level of service to support the proposed 400-seat church. C. Describe the effect the conditional use will have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic impact, and odor. The church is expected to have minimal impact on neighboring properties. There are no residential homes located to the north of Crews Road. The church will provide appropriate buffering in accordance with the Land Development Code (LDC) where adjacent to single-family to the west. Additionally, the parking area lighting will be designed to minimize illumination beyond the property line and clustered along the Santa Barbara Blvd. frontage. The church is also anticipated to generate no odors or noise that would be inappropriate for this location or affect surrounding properties. Further, church services will be held on Sundays and Wednesday evenings, and there are no plans for a school or daycare as part of the proposed conditions. Given the limited nature of its operations, the Page 124 of 403 overall intensity of the site is expected to be relatively low, resulting in minimal impact on surrounding properties and infrastructure D. Describe the site's and the proposed use's compatibility with adjacent properties and other properties in the district. The proposed church as identified on the Conditional Use Site Plan will be over 100' from the northern property line and then separated by almost 1,000' feet from the nearest residentially utilized property. As outlined on the provided site plan, the Applicant proposes buffers that meet the LDC requirements. This includes a 10-foot-wide Type D buffer along Crews Road, which is the northern boundary of the site. The southern boundary will also feature a Type D buffer, while the eastern boundary will have a 15-foot-wide Type D buffer, and the western boundary will be equipped with a 15-foot-wide Type B buffer. It has been determined in numerous instances in Collier County that a church is a compatible use near residential development. The site is bounded on three sides by roadways, and it is the opinion of the certified urban planner preparing this application that the site and use are compatible. The property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement -approved service provider for services and/or other periods of significant traffic generation to accommodate the flux in traffic patterns. E. Please provide any additional information which you may feel is relevant to this request. Supplemental data including a traffic impact statement and environmental data report have been provided with this application. The request for a Conditional Use for Place of Worship in the Agriculture ("EE") zoning district will not negatively affect neighboring properties and will align with the goals, objectives, and policies outlined in the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. The Applicant respectfully requests approval of the Conditional Use and reserves the right to modify this application during the review process to ensure compliance with all code requirements. Page 125 of 403 RVi PL20230006785 - ONE LIFE CHURCH PROPERTY OWNERSHIP HEX Package Page 126 of 403 Crystal K. Kinzel Collier County Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller 3315 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 102 Naples, Florida 34112-5324 Information Sheet for Deeds and Other Documents Transferring Interest in Real Property SUBMITTER INFORMATION Name: Randal Holdman Company/Firm Name: One Life Church Naples Inc. Submitter Address: 3960 Radio Rd. STE 105, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-230-2427 E-mail Address: briannaCa) legal swfl.com PROPERTY INFORMATION Transfer from:a Church (Grantor/Seller) To: one Life Naples Inc. (GranteeiBuyer) Date of Sale/Transfer: September 22, 2024 Purchase Price/Consideration for this transfer was $ 10.00 Is there an existing Mortgage on the property? Yes X No If yes, what is the mortgage balance? $ $0 Are you paying full doc stamps? X Yes No (If No, Please explain below) Are you paying minimal ($0.70) doc stamps? X Yes No (If No, Please explain below) If No, are you exempt under Florida Law or Administrative Code? Yes No (Please explain below) Explanation: Signature of Grantor, Grantee or Agent`. [� . FAILURE TO TO PAY REQUIRED TAXES MAY RESULT IN PENALTIES AND INTEREST. (F.A.C. 9213-4.005) Page 127 of 403 This instrument prepared by and after recording return to: Brianna L. Ayala, Esq. Noble Legal Firm 27499 Riverview Center Blvd Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 00404280002 Property Appraiser's Parcel Identification Number(s) INSTR 6597210 OR 6401 PG 3427 RECORDED 9/26/2024 1.25 PM PAGES 2 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $0 70 REC $18 50 INDX $1 00 QUITCLAIM DEED THIS INDENTURE, made the 22nd day of September 2024 between Grantor: Paul Bellofatto, William Spencer, and Armando Vazquez, as Trustees of the Parkway Life Church of God, an unincorporated church, whose mailing address is 3960 Radio Road, Naples, FL 34104 and Grantee, One Life Church Naples Inc., a Not For Profit Corporation organized under the state laws of Florida, whose mailing address is 3960 Radio Road STE 105, Naples, FL 34104. WITNESSETH, that Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and quitclaim to Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to -wit: THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, SITUATED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA A/K/A TRACT 31, ENCHANTED ACRES, LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. SUBJECT to restrictions, reservations, easements, and covenants of record, reference hereto will not serve to reimpose the same. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim Page 128 of 403 whatsoever of the said Grantor, either in law or equity, to the only proper use benefit and behoof the said Grantee forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. itness: Dana Holdman tartness: Randal Holdman Parkway Life Church of God, an unincorporated church ''' BY: �l Pa Bello atto stee BY: - -- William Spencer Trustee BY: _ Armando Vazquez Trustee Address of Dana Holdman: 775 3Is' St SW, Naples, FL 34117 Address of Randal Holdman: 775 31 st St SW, Naples, FL 34117 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER _ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on September 2024, by Paul Bellofatto, William Spencer, and Armando Vazquez, as Trustees of Parkway Life Church of God, an unincorporated church, who has produced as identification or is pqrson4 known to me by the persons therein. Physical Presences - Online Notarization Personally Known Produced Identification `Eype or Identification a o�Cary-Public--State of Florida Print Notary Name � ,, _ v_ 1 +.w My Commission Number is N W:10116 My Commission Expires: Qh {2b.1� Bialm Gardner Notary Public z State of Florida Commit HH087736 • a r Expires 2/1/2025 Page 129 of 403 INSTR 6597211 OR 6401 PG 3429 RECORDED 9/26/2024 1:25 PM PAGES 3 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA This instrument prepared by REC $27.00 iNDX $2.00 and after recording return to: Brianna L. Ayala, Esq. Noble Legal Firm 27499 Riverview Center Blvd Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 00404280002 Property Appraiser's Parcel Identification Number(s) GENERAL AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally appeared Paul Bellofatto, Armando Vazquez and William Spencer ("Affiants"), who after being duly sworn, deposes and says as follows: 1. This affidavit is made with regard to the following described property: THE WEST 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1!4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP, 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, SITUATED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA A/K/A TRACT 31, ENCHANTED ACRES, LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. 2. On April 19, 2023 the described property was conveyed to the Grantees: Paul Bellofatto, Paul Stanley Dykes, and William Spencer, as Trustees of the Parkway Life Church of God an unincorporated church. 3. Parkway Life Church of God is an unincorporated church governed by Church of God Florida State Office. 4. On or about �,}(� ��a� , Trustee Paul Stanley Dykes resigned as Trustee. Page 130 of 403 5. According to the bi-laws of the Church of God General Assembly minutes (S46. LOCAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES -Section 1) dated April 17, 2024, the following are the currently acting Local Board of Trustees: Paul Bellofatto, William Spencer, Armando Vazquez. 6. The Local Board of Trustees have the power and authority under the Parkway Life Church of God rules to sign all documents related to the above -described property. 7. Affiant further states that Affiant is familiar with the nature of an oath, and with the penalties as provided by the laws of the State aforesaid for falsely swearing to statements made in the instrument of this nature. DATED this the 22nd day of September, 2024. Trustees of Parkway Life Church of God, an uncorporated church Pau Bel ofatto, as Trus e Wi m S enc r, s trustee AnGando V zquez, as Tru ee SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me, this 22nd day of September 2024 by Paul Bellofatto, William Spencer, Armando Vazquez, who is ersonall�known to me or who has produced as identification. My Commission Expires: NTITAX-V KJBLIC - ewe Ammer Notary Public State of Florida Comm# HM087736 Page 131 of 403 parkwaylifechurch April 17, 2024 According to the bi-laws of the Church of God General Assembly minutes (S46. LOCAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES — Section 1) Each local church or congregation that owns any property (either real or personal), shall appoint a Local Board of Trustees, to consist of not less than three members. Parkway Life Church of God along with the recommendation of the local Pastor, Rev. Randal L. Holdman, present Paul Bellofatto; William Spencer; Armondo Vasquez as a Local Board of Trustees. These members shall hold office until their successors are appointed. Senior Pastor - Randal Holdman Board of Trustee -- Paul Be fatto Armando Vaq}uez 3960 Radio Road Naples, I:1 34104 t/ 1.3- Date 14; , Date Date Date 239--455-1534 Page 132 of 403 Crystal K. Kinzel Collier County Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller 3315 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 102 Naples, Florida 34112-5324 Information Sheet for Deeds and Other Documents Transferring Interest in Real Property SUBMITTER INFORMATION Name: Randal Holdman Company/Firm Name: One Life Church Navies Inc. Submitter Address: 3960 Radio Rd. STE 105, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-230 2427 T E-mail Address: brianna* legalswfl.com PROPERTY INFORMATION Transfer from: Parkway Life Church (Grantor/Seller) To: One Life Naples Inc. (Grantee/Buyer) Date of Sale/Transfer: September 22, 2024 Purchase Price/Consideration for this transfer was $ 10.00 Is there an existing Mortgage on the property? Yes X No If yes, what is the mortgage balance? $ $0 Are you paying full doc stamps? ___X. Yes No (If No, Please explain below) Are you paying minimal ($0.70) doc stamps? X Yes No (If No, Please explain below) If No, are you exempt under Florida Law or Administrative Code? Yes No (Please explain below) Explanation: Signature of Grantor, Grantee or Agent: FAILURE TO PAY REQUIRED TAXES MAY RESULT IN PENALTIES AND INTEREST. (F.A.C. 1213-4.005) Page 133 of 403 This instrument prepared by and after recording return to: Brianna L. Ayala, Esq. Noble Legal Firm 27499 Riverview Center Blvd Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 00404240000 Property Appraiser's Parcel Identification Number(s) INSTR 6597007 OR 6401 PG 2624 RECORDED 9/25/2024 3.52 PM PAGES 2 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@ 70 $0.70 REC $18 50 INDX $1.00 CONS $10.00 QUITCLAIM DEED THIS INDENTURE, made the 22nd day of September 2024 between Grantor: Paul Bellofatto, Armando Vaquez, and William Spencer, as Trustees of the Parkway Life Church of God, an unincorporated church, whose mailing address is 3960 Radio Road, Naples, FL 34104 and Grantee, One Life Church Naples Inc., a Not For Profit Corporation organized under the state laws of Florida, whose mailing address is 3960 Radio Road STE 105, Naples, FL 34104. WITNESSETH, that Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO-`100 DOLLARS ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and quitclaim to Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to -wit: THE EAST 112 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1 /4, OF THE SOUTHEAST 1!4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1 4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA; RESERVING THEREFROM THE NORTH 30 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. SUBJECT to restrictions, reservations, easements, and covenants of record, reference hereto will not serve to reimpose the same. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim Page 134 of 403 whatsoever of the said Grantor, either in law or equity, to the only proper use benefit and behoof the said Grantee forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. �ess: Dana Holdman Witness:tancfHoldman Parkway Life Church of God, an unincorporated church IM BY: William Sped r Truste BY -do VazqArm uez Trustee Address of Dana Holdman: 775 3Is' St SW, Naples, FL 34117 Address of Randal Holdman: 775 3111 St SW, Naples, FL 34117 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on September 22, 2024, by Paul Bellofatto, William Spencer, Armando Vazquez, as Trustees of Parkway Life Church of God, an unincorporated church, who has produced as identification or is persona_ known to me by the persons therein. Physical Presence Online Notarization Personally KnaN+n Produced Identifwation Type of Identification Notary ublic--State of Florida Print Notary Name. �� - r My Commission Number is JH f--1 My Commission Expires: 2j � .1 Notary Public: 1 Stan of Florida j COmrntt HH097736 Expires 2/1/2025 Page 135 of 403 INSTR 6597008 OR 6401 PG 2626 This instrument prepared by RECORDED 9/25/2024 3-52 PM PAGES 3 and after recording return to: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Brianna L. Ayala, Esq. REC $27 00 INDX $1.00 Noble Legal Firm 27499 Riverview Center Blvd Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 00404240000 Property Appraiser's Parcel Identification Number(s) GENERAL AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally appeared Paul Bellofatto, Armando Vazquez and William Spencer ("Affiants"), who after being duly sworn, deposes and says as follows : 1. This affidavit is made with regard to the following described property: THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 114, OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA; RESERVING THEREFROM THE NORTH 30 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, 2. On April 19, 2023 the described property was conveyed to the Grantees: Paul Bellofatto, Paul Stanley Dykes, and William Spencer, as Trustees of the Parkway Life Church of God an unincorporated church. 3. Parkway Life Church of God is an unincorporated church governed by Church of God Florida State Office.,�ty�" 4. On or about 1 I Itt.& q t�l© , Trustee Paul Stanley Dykes resigned as Trustee. 5. According to the bi-laws of the Church of God General Assembly minutes (S46. LOCAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES- Section I) dated April 17, 2024, the following are the currently acting Local Board of Trustees: Paul Bellofatto, William Spencer, Armando Vazquez. Page 136 of 403 6. The Local Board of Trustees have the power and authority under the Parkway Life Church of God rules to sign all documents related to the above -described property. 7. Affiant further states that Affiant is familiar with the nature of an oath, and with the penalties as provided by the laws of the State aforesaid for falsely swearing to statements made in the instrument of this nature. DATED this the 22nd day of September 2024. Trustees of Parkway Life Church of God, an unincof ated church aul Bel fc fatto,, as Truste William Sp cc , Trustee t A ndo V quez, as Trust SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me, this 22nd day of September 2024 by Paul Bellofatto, William Spencer, Armando Vazquez, who is personal1y nown to me or who has produced as identification. N V KJBLIC My Commission Expires: 1 /1 /?D�_15 Stake Gerdiw Notary Public z State of Florida CaMM# HH087736 • f IS11)7 Explres 2/1/202S Page 137 of 403 parkwaylifechurch April 17, 2024 According to the bi-laws of the Church of God General Assembly minutes (S46. LOCAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES — Section 1) Each local church or congregation that owns any property (either real or personal), shall appoint a Local Board of Trustees, to consist of not less than three members. Parkway Life Church of God along with the recommendation of the local Pastor, Rev. Randal L. Holdman, present Paul Bellofatto; William Spencer; Armondo Vasquez as a Local Board of Trustees. These members shall hold office until their successors are appointed. Senior Pastor - Randal Holdman Board of Trustee — Paul Be fatto Armando Va44uez 3960 Radio Road Napks, fl 34104 V/ rn-any Date � Date Date Date 239-#55-M4 Page 138 of 403 Crystal K. Kinzel Collier County Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller 3315 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 102 Naples, Florida 34112-5324 Information Sheet for Deeds and Other Documents Transferring Interest in Real Property SUBMITTER INFORMATION Name: Randal Holdman Company/Firm Name: One Life Church Naples Inc._ Submitter Address: 3960 Radio Rd. STE 105, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-230-2427 E-mail Address: brianna@legalswfl.com PROPERTY INFORMATION Transfer from: Parkway Life Church (Grantor/Seller) To: One. Life Naples Inc__— (Grantee/Buyer) Date of Sale/Transfer: SeLtember 22, 2024 Purchase Price/Consideration for this transfer was $ 10.00 Is there an existing Mortgage on the property? Yes X No If yes, what is the mortgage balance? $ $0 Are you paying full doc stamps? X Yes No (If No, Please explain below) Are you paying minimal ($0.70) doc stamps? X Yes No (If No, Please explain below) If No, are you exempt under Florida Law or Administrative Code? Yes No (Please explain below) Explanation: Signature of Grantor, Grantee or Ag FAILURE TO PAY REQUIRED TAXES MAY RESULT IN PENALTIES AND INTEREST. (F.A.C. 1213-4.005) Page 139 of 403 This instrument prepared by and after recording return to: Brianna L. Ayala, Esq. Noble Legal Firm 27499 Riverview Center Blvd Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 00426680004 Property Appraiser's Parcel Identification Number(s) INSTR 6597009 OR 6401 PG 2629 RECORDED 9/25/2024 3.52 PM PAGFS 2 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@ 70 $0.70 REC $18 50 INDX $1 00 CONS $10 00 QUITCLAIM DEED THIS INDENTURE, made the 22nd day of September 2024 between Grantor: Paul Bellofatto, William Spencer, and Armando Vazquez, as Trustees of the Parkway Life Church of God, an unincorporated church, whose mailing address is 3960 Radio Road, Naples, FL 34104 and Grantee, One Life Church Naples Inc., a Not For Profit Corporation organized under the state laws of Florida, whose mailing address is 3960 Radio Road STE 105, Naples, FL 34104. WITNESSETH, that Grantor, for and inconsideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and quitclaim to Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to -wit: THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1-4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF RESERVED FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY PURPOSES, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO KNOWN AS TRACTS 7 AND 8, SECTION 17. ALSO LESS THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY VIRTUE OF THAT CERTAIN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4325, PAGE 2194. SUBJECT to restrictions, reservations, casements, and covenants of record, reference hereto will not serve to reimpose the same. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said Grantor, either in law or equity, to the only proper use benefit and behoof the said Grantee forever. Page 140 of 403 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Witness: Dana Holdman Witness: Randal Holdman Parkway Life Church of God, an unincorporated church , BY: - Paul lofatto T tee Trustee Address of Dana Holdman: 775 3151 St SW, Naples, FL 34117 Address of Randal Holdman: 775 3151 St SW, Naples, FL 34117 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on September 22, 2024, by Paul Bellofatto, William Spencer, and Armando Vazquez, as Trustees of Parkway Life Church of God, an unincorporated church, who has produced as identification or is pgrsomUy known to me by the persons therein. Physical Presence' Online Notarization _ Personally Known /-0 Produced Identification Type of Identification o ary Pubic --State of Florida Print Notary Name: 11.Ve. (y ej 5 " My Commission Number is. j4 14 n I 36 My Commission Expires 211/2,02' BMW Gwdrwr Notary Public State of Florida COMM# HHOO7736 Expires 2/1/2025 Page 141 of 403 This instrument prepared by and after recording return to: IPJSTR 6597Ci0 OR 0401 PG 2G3t RECORDED 9/25/2024 3 52 PM PAGES 3 Brianna L. Ayala, Esq. CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER Noble Legal Firm COL IE CO NTINDX FLORIDA 27499 Riverview Center Blvd REC Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 00426680004 Property Appraiser's Parcel Identification Number(s) GENERAL AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally appeared Paul Bellofatto, Armando Vazquez and William Spencer ("Affiants"), who after being duly sworn, deposes and says as follows : 1. This affidavit is made with regard to the following described property: THE NORTHEAST 1I4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF RESERVED FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY PURPOSES, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO KNOWN AS TRACTS 7 AND 8, SECTION 17. ALSO LESS THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY VIRTUE OF THAT CERTAIN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4325, PAGE 2194. 2. On April 19, 2023 the described property was conveyed to the Grantees: Paul Bellofatto, Paul Stanley Dykes, and William Spencer, as Trustees of the Parkway Life Church of God an unincorporated church. 3. Parkway Life Church of God is an unincorporated church governed by Church of God Florida State Office. 4. On or about (�{��} _(�, Trustee Paul Stanley Dykes resigned as Trustee. Page 142 of 403 5. According to the bi-laws of the Church of God General Assembly minutes (S46. LOCAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES -Section 1) dated April 17, 2024, the following are the currently acting Local Board of Trustees: Paul Beilofatto, William Spencer, Armando Vazquez. 6. The Local Board of Trustees have the power and authority under the Parkway Life Church of God rules to sign all documents related to the above -described property. 7. Affiant further states that Affiant is familiar with the nature of an oath, and with the penalties as provided by the laws of the State aforesaid for falsely swearing to statements made in the instrument of this nature. DATED this the 22nd day of September 2024. Trustees of Parkway Life Church of God, an uninrnorated church Z Bello Wiando uuez, A SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me, this 22nd day of September 2024 by Paul Bellofatto, William Spencer, Armando Vazquez, who is,personally_ known to me or who has produced as identification. N P, LIC My Commission Expires: Blake Q dner Notary Public State of Florida Comm# HH087736 r {! ° ExOreS 2/1/2025 Page 143 of 403 parkwaylifechurch April 17, 2024 According to the bi-laws of the Church of God General Assembly minutes (546. LOCAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES —Section 1) Each local church or congregation that owns any property (either real or personal), shall appoint a Local Board of Trustees, to consist of not less than three members. Parkway Life Church of God along with the recommendation of the local Pastor, Rev. Randal L. Holdman, present Paul Bellofatto; William Spencer; Armondo Vasquez as a Local Board of Trustees. These members shall hold office until their successors are appointed. Senior Pastor - Randal Holdman Board of Trustee — Paul Be fatto Armando Vaj}uez Date Date Date Date 3960 Radio Road Naples. 1:1 34104 239-455-1534 Page 144 of 403 Receipt# 008903234 9/25/2024 3:52:44 PM Crystal K. Kinzel Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller rFp co O 0 O O ��0909�H Egg( �0[pq Customer Deputy Clerk Clerk Office Location RANDAL LEE HOLDMAN Tila C. Griffin Collier County Govt. Center 775 31 ST ST SW TIIa.Griffln@Collierclerk.com Building LA, 2nd Floor NAPLES, FL 34117-3113 239-252-2646 3315 Tamiami Trl E Ste 102 Naples, Florida 34112-4901 4 Documents Recorded DOC TYPE INSTRUMENT BOOK PAGE AMOUNT Deed 6597007 6401 2624 $20.20 Consideration: $10.00, 100% Applied Affidavit 6597008 6401 2626 $28.00 Deed 6597009 6401 2629 $20.20 Consideration: $10.00, 100% Applied Affidavit 6597010 6401 2631 $28.00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $96.40 Check# 23240 ($96.40) BALANCE DUE $0.00 Note: 9/25/2024 3:52:44 PM Tila C. Griffin: Disclaimer: All transactions are subject to review/verification. The Clerk reserves the right to correct for clerical errors and to assess or refund charges as needed. Page 1 of 1 Page 145 of 403 Receipt# 008903435 9/26120241:25:19 PM Crystal K. Kinzel u 1 Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller @ ��o CZ1 0 a Customer . Deputy Clerk Clerk Office Location ONE LIFE CHURCH NAPLES Kyndall A. Ortiz Collier County Govt. Center INC Recordinghelp@CollierClerk.com Building LA, 2nd Floor 3960 RADIO RD STE 105 239-252-2646 3315 Tamiami Trl E Ste 102 NAPLES, FL 34104-3741 Naples, Florida 34112-4901 2 Documents Recorded DOC TYPE INSTRUMENT BOOK PAGE AMOUNT Deed 6597210 6401 3427 $20.20 Affidavit 6597211 6401 3429 $29.00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $49.20 VALUED CUSTOMER Card: 3001 (Approval: 871917) ($49.20) BALANCE DUE $0.00 Note: 9/26/2024 1:25:19 PM Kyndall A. Ortiz: An additional card convenience fee of 3.5% was paid to nCourt LLC for a total card amount of: $50.92. Questions regarding processing fees should be directed to nCourt at (239) 207-3731 or (800) 701-8560. Reference Invoice Number: b9c9e963-a7d6-427a-blb2-1201cf5d82db and Item Number: 14920240926132445 Disclaimer: All transactions are subject to review/verification. The Clerk reserves the right to correct for clerical errors and to assess or refund charges as needed. @@00Page 1 of 1 Page 146 of 403 RVi PL20230006785 - ONE LIFE CHURCH HEX Package AUTHORIZATION FROM TRUSTEES Page 147 of 403 Affidavit of Authorization State of Florida County of Collier 10/21/2024 Affidavit of Authorization I, the undersigned, Armando Vazquez, residing at13680 Troia Drive, Estero, FL 33928, being of legal age and sound mind, do hereby declare and affirm as follows: 1. I am a trustee of One Life Church of Naples, Inc., located at 3960 Radio Rd, STE 105, Naples, FL 34104. 2. This affidavit is made for the purpose of authorizing Randal Holdman, residing at 775 31 st St SW, Naples, FL 34117, to act on behalf of all trustees of One Life Church of Naples, Inc. in matters requiring signature and decision -making authority. 3. Randal Holdman is hereby authorized to sign all necessary documents, contracts, agreements, and any other papers related to the operations and administration of One Life Church Naples, Inc. 4. This authorization is effective as of 10/21/2024 and shall remain in effect until revoked in writing by a majority of the trustees. [Name of Authorizing Trustee] [Title, if appli [Date]Z�- [Name of Authorized Member] [Title, if applicable] [Date] r �. % ras`%�� /©-2.-Y-Z9 [Name of Authorized Member] [Title, if applicable] [Date] Page 148 of 403 Witnes [Name of Witness] [Address of Witness] [Date] Notarization: Subscribed and sworn to before me this ZOday of 4244y 2i9k [Notary Public Na ] // Notary Public I�Cj� My commission expir io1/�!/28 o M�i�lmr -, Notary a'ubec State of Florida • COMM# HH597n6 Expires 10/1 $ Page 149 of 403 RVi PL20230006785 - ONE LIFE CHURCH HEX Package PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM Page 150 of 403 Cottier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 'ROPFRTY n%AiKirRc41ia nISCLOc-1 iRF FnRnn This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address I % of Ownership NOT -FOR -PROFIT b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: C Name and Address % of Ownership Randal Holdman, SR Pastor Representative William Spencer (Trustee) Representative Paul Bellofatto (Trustee) Representative Armando Vaquez (Trustee) Representative One Life Church Congregants 100% If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Created 9/28/2017 Name and Address I % of Ownership Page 1 of 3 Page 151 of 403 Cottier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: e f f. Name and Address I % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the 'I I IL.CI J, a L U L.RI IUIUIn J, UCI ICI luau ICJ, UI f CII LI ICI J. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers. if a corporation. partnership. or trust: Name and Address 4119/2023, 4/25/2023,4/26/2023 Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Page 152 of 403 CAT County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 2S2-1036 I Email: GMDClientServices@coliiercountyfl.gov www.calliercountyfl.gov Date of option: Date option terminates: . or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether Individually or with a Trustee, Company or other Interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately If such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agenVapplicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email- GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov Agent/Owner Signature Date Agent/Owner Name (please print) 01/2023 Page 3 of 3 Page 153 of 403 PL20230006785 - ONE LIFE CHURCH AFFIDAVIT OF REPRESENTATION HEX Package Page 154 of 403 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20230006785 1, Randal Holdman (print name), as Pastor (title, if applicable) of one Life church Naples. Inc (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner�applicant Qcontract purchaserFland that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Weil authorize Fort construction Group of Naples and RVi Planning to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's 'Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of pedury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. 'Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing i Wstrument was acknowleged before me by means of xl physical presence or Q online notarization this U day of kkZftb.,C 202Y by (printed name of owner or qualifier) A�4/ i��yl Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: 0 Are personally known to me ® Has produced a current drivers license [Has produced as identification. Notary Signature CM08-COA-001151155 REV 3/4/2020 BeiOMM MB I&W ry Pubk of Florkla Comm# HHSOM Expires 1W14/2= Page 155 of 403 RVi PL20230006785 - ONE LIFE CHURCH NIM INFORMATION HEX Package Page 156 of 403 February 12, 2024 RE: One Life Church Conditional Use PL20230006785 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that One Life Church Naples, Inc has filed a Conditional Use application (PL20230006785) with Collier County. This application is seeking approval of a 400-seat church (place of worship) within the Agricultural Zoning District. The subject property is Agricultural Zoning District. The property totals 15 +/- acres. The Property is generally located north of Whitaker Road and west of Santa Barbara Blvd. in unincorporated Collier County, Florida. Section 08, Township 50, Range 26, Naples, Florida In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about these applications and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Monday, March 3, 2025, at 5:30 p.m. at Christ The King Presbyterian Church. 5510 Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples 34112 Attending virtually is also available via Zoom. Please visit www.zoom.us, click on "Join A Meeting" in the top right corner, and enter Zoom Meeting ID: 899 2144 9776, Passcode: 629414. The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me directly at (407) 775- 6523 or PMurrav(@RViPlannina.com Thank you, RVi Planning+ Landscape Architecture Patrick Murray, AICP Planning Project Manager RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture • 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Sutie 305 • Bonita Springs, FL 34135 • 239.405.7777 • www.rviplanning.com Page 157 of 403 Location Map 3. �i Crows Rid I 1� h-�eparlunity Ci — 'YilhKaker Rid. Subject t PropertyAl RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture 1 2 of 2 One Life Church Conditional Use PL20230006785 Page 158 of 403 r z W N N N N N N N C) M n C) N N M M N (D m (D M M O C) N C) N M N C) N N N N N N N O M N N . . . . . . . O O N O e-I O O O e-I e-I M e-I O O " O e-I O e-I N e-I O . . . . . e-I e-I w . e-I e-I N �--i e-i e-i e-i e-i e-i e-i Nt e-i N LO Nt e-i Nt Nt Nt e-i e-i e-i m m m w m �--i C) �--i M �--i Nt Nt Nt Nt Nt Nt �--i �--i 00 Nt M M M M M M M M M M M N N 00 M (O M M M M M M M M M M M Cl) M M W H 0 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL O LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL N N Z LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U LL LL LL 2 U ¢ Z _ m O Z ~ M O Y J W u) O LU J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J Z H ¢ Z J LU ¢ J J J J J J J J J J > J J J a a a a a a a a a U a a a a a W a¢ N=¢¢ O a v a Z a a a a a a a a a m a a a U Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z U Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Q U U W Z U Z N Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O Z Z Z M O N 00 2 V H N Nt O x Ln W CF) m Z N W 0 J w N Z O > OD > m < OC U) N N W cc L U 0 0 m LU Z Z Z W H 0 J O = O cc cc ¢ W J m O ¢ 2 H H H Zm > LL C W J m W Q Ln ¢ W ¢ N ¢ < N ¢ ¢ ¢ W N N < ¢¢ w x< = N z ¢ M O ¢ O¢ W N m N 2 H H H CC O Z:)p ~ n ¢ 00 NtLo 00 Cl) Cl) Cl) ¢ O Z O O 04 Z N Cl) Lfi N N N N Z W¢ -4 M U7 J J } LL w Y } U) ¢ H (n (n W H J H H 2 N LU ,--i LU U LL O z w LU J Q m Z O J z zO o o ¢ m W 2~ } �7- _ o O O N O J Z ¢ U W O J W W J U H LU LU Q CC p J J J J J J 0 0 m p �_ m OW D w 0 0 0= p w>> > z z 0 w 0 0 0 0� 0 0 w U 0 O w> w > O CC O cc cc O v x¢ 0¢ J w N J �j O O O O z O O Q z m c m w z m z P J w v� 0 W W� x Q Y o�c w LU Q °�° 0 0 w- z m CO LUJ ¢¢ �--� U C� M ¢ U U W �� 0 Z J Y ¢ cc w cn w w oc o~c Z 2 H Q> D O Q Z LJi Z Z Q w �0 UO U cwn Q Q Q Q O Q Q O w N OQC U) J Q 0 m 0 E � X = H � � = N � j W W W cn c=n o�c c¢n c=n o¢C oQC oQC oQC cc O oQC oQC � U O W Ln Z O O N Lo (n Z m M m -A ¢ ¢ M ~ OC O m � n O w O m O 0 m O O -4 Ln � � O m n QM¢ 00 Ln W ¢ Q r-i O O D U N N W M Ln Ln M n r-i 0 O n M n O O n 00 m (n Ln M Z M¢ N U m N W U m m M 0 o o M LL o o � � N MCD r-I - Q� N M M M� M M M M¢ M M U) m H w X m N O 0 cc J ¢ 0 w 0 U o~c ¢ O O LU 7 m¢ U Z OY Q Z J} w w Z m 2 > m ¢ W M W U OC CC Lu m w W z M> W m W w W J ¢ Lr7 O ¢ ¢ 2 2 O Z M m m 0 0 U U 0 N U U Z U 0 Q 0 0¢ z U Z Z w F- z w N U) U) 0 N LL Z J U U z W¢¢ Z J r m O J �¢ 0 0 J cc Q a W CC = J = H M cc 0 J W ~ N N W 0 > 0 0 N U U¢ CD U LU J a Q ¢¢ CS w Z 11 cn U N N> J J Z — LU¢ cn > ¢ w w a J O J w w N Z w w J p wLU Oz 2 ?� cwn c~n c~n N Y N U 0C m w OC OC D Y m Z Z Z O m U 0 Q m 0 Z w Z w w O Z Z 0=LU LU z z O O Z W p p co Y a Z °C 0 0¢ 0 0 0¢ 0¢C O Z O w w ¢ w w O cn cn w w N Q cn ¢ U U m O O O m Y¢ > w w cc o¢C z a a z a w c¢n � LLLL m� CCC z Y<_ a<¢ J J Z oWC 00 _3 Z Z Z (_� oNC d U~7 w U a j j 0 Q O_ Q z H ¢ W m¢¢ W W_J O N N O Q Z w w¢¢ Z m W O O¢¢ U= Z O 0 0 0 w w w w LL (� (� (� (� 2 Y Z Z z z 0 W oc cc cc 0 N N> > cm 0 a 0 rn Ln m 0 m a Iz co _ of �E �0 OU 0 o Q o a o o 0 LocaliQ Florida GANNETT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Patrick Murray RVI Planning, Inc 28100 Bonita Grande DR # 305 Bonita Springs FL 34135-6221 STATE OF WISCONSIN, COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, who on oath says that he or she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Naples Daily News, a newspaper published in Collier County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Ad in the matter of Public Notices, was published on the publicly accessible website of Collier and Lee Counties, Florida, or in a newspaper by print in the issues of, on: 02/14/2025 Affiant further says that the website or newspaper complies with all legal requirements for publication in chapter 50, Florida Statutes. Subscribed and sworn to before me, by the legal clerk, who is personally known to me, on 02/14/2025 Lega erk Notary, State Co my rown 5.15a 7 My commission expires Publication Cost: $456.72 Tax Amount: $0.00 Payment Cost: $456.72 Order No: 11035340 # of Copies: Customer No: 1126761 1 PO #: THIS IS NOT AN fNVOICE! Please do not use this form for payment remittance. NANCY HEYRMAN Notary Public State of Wisconsin PO Box 631244 Cincinnati, OH 45263-1244 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. on behalf of One Life Church Naples, Inc at the following time and location: Monday, March 03, 2025, at 5:30 P.m. Christ The King Presbyterian Church 5510 Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples 34112 Attending virtually is also available via Zoom. Please visit www.zoom.us, click on "Join A Meeting" in the top right corner, and enter Zoom Meeting I D: 899 2144 9776, Posscode: 629414. Please be advised that One Life Church Naples, Inc has filed a Conditional Use application (PL20230006785) with Collier County. This application is seeking approval of a 400-seat church (Place of worship) within the Agricul- tural Zoning District. The subiect Property is Agricultural Zoning District. The property totals 15 +/- acres. The Property is generally located north of Whitaker Road and west of Santa Barbara Blvd. in unincorporated Collier County, Florida. Section 08, Township 50, Range 26, Naples, Florida. WE VALUE YOUR INPUT The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an impending zoning application and to faster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. Business and property owners and residents are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the Proiect with the owners' representatives. If You are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed to: RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc, c/o Patrick Murray, AICP 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Suite 305, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 (407) 775-6523 OR pJmu=Yj2L11Pj9_nM1Ag_QQM Feb. 14, 2025 #11035340 Page 1 of 1 Page 161 of 403 V W z N j-- � W 0 0 cO0Q0 z D N °moo^^ eW LL 2 = a 00 W = LL J 0 W = z O W z � IN L La cl CZZ 7 W / v �- �- ._ v 1 = y 3 C/ cM O 4- 0 N CD N 0) co Cl) O 0 m 4 v zi LU L ►� ILI 40 M q V CJ a o ~ ce c 4 LU W (� CT ° f S Z � LU z d i Z uj N H W J CWC Q G O O C 00 Q O Z z 2 N O o O M Mix = 14 = a O U = W Y. J m W = z O Lu z N W i 9 0 V r J W W Q Z Q� lv 1 i m M U Q t Q W � N C -� C � 16 � d J 00 00 1� CD C- CD -, m Q) CV N O N � J O WI � E w O 14 Q Ln z O C\, W 0 CD _o ~ O rn zo z � O O (a) U z � a Cl) O � o U a � =V f a O Z Z p co w C 2 EU H J Q 2 J a) N � Z . Cn o opioo rro � 1 � � c i U � � U � o o u Lf) Q V Q i O U � U v O I + + V N r r E 0 o U i o r U Q v Q C O a V) 0 0 U) X _� �j C o N n m Q r _ U zC_ U 0 � V w � 0 ( ) J �0 I__L 0 T ^O W V LL V V 4-j ^� A V) L N O LO V O .L O O O V L O N %- N — V � c64—j X O Q _ , cn N O _ N O � c co Ln 4-j O co V) .� cz O Q) D + V c6 D v' O V }, — N O D •`�' >1 +_+ V .L 4� o V _0 Q Q .L V � V 0 u L ca o Q a-j N N O O O v .E .E OfJ J Ln r ry Q � O � M C6 I E O O E� u Q l/) Ln Lno 0 V k Q } a--j Q O v O � �O m O V � � O � � L v Qc� m N +� O CD L Q) Q) T O O O E-0 E m �� O lJ � � - O Ln I a) w � 0Ln 0 N E N V V V cn O V �6 O Q O O U 4-j Ln � a I T a_ � O a o 0 0 0 m ,_ 0 0 c O N 0 N Q 2 WHITAKER RD ad SM3dD c m a Memorandum To: Tim Flynn, Collier County Growth Management Division From: Alexis Crespo, RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc. Date: March 3, 2025 Subject: One Life Church - Conditional Use (PL2023000678) Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary RVI Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc., Fort Construction Group Naples, and One Life Church conducted a neighborhood informational meeting (NIM) for the One Life Church Conditional Use on Monday, March 3, 2025, at 5:30 p.m. at Christ The King Presbyterian Church; 5510 Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples 34112. A copy of the legal notice, affidavit of publication, a copy of the letter sent to the surrounding property owners and a list of the surrounding property owners are attached as Exhibit "A". The affidavit of legal advertisement is attached as Exhibit "B". Alexis Crespo started the meeting at approximately 5:35. A list of attendees is attached as "Exhibit C". A presentation was provided to attendees explaining the project team, the project location, and the request for the Conditional Use. The presentation is attached as "Exhibit D". The following key conditions/commitments were noted: ✓ The Conditional Use would allow for a 400-seat church "Place of Worship" in the Agricultural (E) zoning district. ✓ Development is limited to one principal structure not to exceed 25,000 sq. ft. ✓ The use is limited to specific days of the week and hours for services ✓ Schools and/or day care center uses are expressly prohibited/not requested Following discussion of the conditions that would be included with the application, Alexis showed the site plan and described the improvements that would be made. This included ingress and egress, buffers, parking requirements, and off -site infrastructure improvements. Lastly, architectural elevations were shown of the church from various perspectives. Following the presentation, the following questions were posed by attendees with responses from the Applicant noted. Q: When will the church break ground? A: The church is hopeful to begin construction in the 3rd quarter of this year. Q: Nothing can occur beyond the outlined development and site plan? RVi Planning + Landscape Architecture • 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Sutie 305 • Bonita Springs, FL 34135 • 239.405.7777 • www.rviplanning.com Page 173 of 403 A: At this time, the construction will occur as shown on the site plan. The Applicant would have to file a new conditional use to expand the church use beyond what was described. The meeting concluded at approximately 5:50 pm. RM Planning + Landscape Architecture 1 2 of 2 Page 174 of 403 RVi PL20230006785 - ONE LIFE CHURCH TRAFFIC STUDY HEX Package llv Page 175 of 403 TRANSPORTATION II Tffm% CONSULTANTS, INC MEMORANDUM 2726 OAK RIDGE COURT, SUITE 503 FORT MYERS, FL 33901-9356 OFFICE 239.278.3090 FAX 239.278.1906 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SIGNAL SYSTEMS/DESIGN TO: Brooks Witcher Fort Construction Group FROM: Yury Bykau, P.E. Senior Transportation Consultant DATE: Revised: April 25, 2024 RE: Parkway Life Church — Conditional Use (PL20230006785) Collier County, Florida METHODOLOGY REVIEW FEE - $500.00 SMALL SCALE STUDY — NO ADDITIONAL FEE TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. has completed a traffic analysis for the Conditional Use (CU) application for the proposed Parkway Life Church to be located at the southwest corner of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Crews Road in Collier County, Florida. Attached Figure I illustrates the approximate location of the subject site. The proposed Conditional Use (CU) application will allow the subject site to be developed with a church use consisting of a total of approximately 23,734 square feet of floor area and 400 seats. Access to the site will be provided to Crews Road and Whitaker Road via a single connection at each location. Crews Road and Whitaker Road both intersect Santa Barbara Boulevard via directional median openings. EXISTING CONDITIONS Crews Road & Whitaker Road are both local roadways that border the subject site to the north and south, respectively. The posted speed limit on Whitaker Road is 30 mph. Since there is no posted speed limit on Crews Road, the speed limit per Florida Statute 316.183(2) is 30 mph. Concurrency is not measured on these local roadways. Santa Barbara Boulevard is a north/south six -lane divided arterial that borders the site to the east. The Level of Service Standard on Santa Barbara Boulevard (Link #79.0) is LOS "E", or 3,100 vehicles. Santa Barbara Boulevard has a posted speed limit of 45 mph and is under the jurisdiction of Collier County. Page 176 of 403 7ATRTRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC TRIP GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION Brooks Witcher Parkway Life Church CU PL20230006785 April 25, 2024 Page 2 The Institute of Transportation Engineers Report titled Trip Generation Manual, I Vh Edition, was referenced to estimate the trip generation for the proposed church development. Pursuant to the attached Methodology Meeting Notes, the trip generation for the proposed church was based on ITE Land Use Code 560 (Church). It is important to note that utilizing the number of seats as opposed to the floor area of the church results in the most conservative trip generation scenario. The trip generation comparison for the church based on the number of seats and the floor area can be found in the methodology meeting notes that are attached to the Appendix of this report. The equations used from the aforementioned land use are also contained in the Appendix of this report for reference. Table 1 provides a summary of the development intensity as currently proposed. Table 1 Land Use Parkwav Life Church ,and Use Size Church 23,734 Sq. Ft. & (LUC 560) 400 Seats Table 2 provides a summary of the weekday trip generation projections for the proposed church based on the number of seats. Table 3 outlines the anticipated Sunday peak hour trip and daily generation of the church based on the number of seats. Table 2 Trip Generation Parkway Life Church Land Use Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Daily (2-way) In Out Total In Out Total Church 17 11 28 18 22 40 355 (400 Seats) Table 3 Sunday Trip Generation Parkway Life Church Land Use Sunday Peak Hour of Generator Sunday In Out Total (2-way) Churc I (400 Seats) 93 97 F190 884 Page 177 of 403 TRANSPORTATION Brooks Witcher 7A TM CONSULTANTS, I N C Parkway Life Church CU PL20230006785 April 25, 2024 Page 3 The weekday peak hour trips shown in Table 2 for the proposed church were then assigned to the site access drives and the surrounding roadway network. The project traffic distribution was determined in the methodology with staff and is illustrated in the attached Figure 2. Figure 2 also illustrates the assignment of project trips (including Sunday peak hour trips from Table 3) to the site access drives based upon the project traffic distribution. CONCURRENCY/LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS In order to determine which roadway segments surrounding the site will be significantly impacted, Table 1A, attached to this Memorandum, was created. This table indicates which, if any, roadway links will accommodate an amount of project traffic greater than the 2%-2%-3% Significance Test. Therefore, the traffic generated as a result of the proposed development (Table 2) was compared with the Capacity for Peak Hour — Peak Direction traffic conditions as defined by the 2023 Collier County Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR). From Table IA, no roadway segments are shown to be significantly impacted by the proposed development. In addition to the significant impact criteria, attached Table 2A includes the concurrency analysis on the Collier County Roadway network. The current remaining capacity and Level of Service Standard for each roadway segment analyzed was obtained from the 2023 Collier County Annual Inventory Update Report (AUIR). A three-year planning analysis was also conducted. In order to estimate the projected 2026 background traffic volumes, the existing 2023 peak hour peak direction traffic volumes from the 2023 AUIR were adjusted by the appropriate growth rate. The growth rate calculations are shown on the attached Table 3A. These projected volumes were then compared with the 2023 existing plus trip bank volumes from the 2023 AUIR. The more conservative of the two volumes was then utilized as the 2026 background traffic volume. The concurrency analysis was then performed by subtracting the project traffic volumes that will result with the proposed development from the 2026 background remaining capacity in order to determine whether or not sufficient capacity will be available after the addition of the new traffic associated with the proposed CU approval. Based on the information contained within Table 2A, there will be sufficient capacity on the surrounding roadway network to serve the new trips generated as a result of the proposed development. Attached Figure 3 was created to summarize the results of the concurrency analysis on the adjacent roadway network. CONCLUSION The proposed Parkway Life Church development meets Collier County Consistency and Concurrency requirements. The surrounding roadway network was analyzed based on the 2023 Collier County Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR) and future 2026 buildout traffic conditions. As a result, sufficient capacity is indicated along surrounding roadways in 2026 both with and without the proposed development. Page 178 of 403 TRANSPORTATION Brooks Witcher 7A TRCONSULTANTS, I N C Parkway Life Church CU PL20230006785 April 25, 2024 Page 4 Site specific turn lane improvements will be evaluated at the time the project seeks a site development plan approval. Attachments KA2023\10 OctoberM Parkway Life of Church Conditional Use Collier County\Sufficiency\4-25-2024 TIS Memorandum.doc Page 179 of 403 METHODOLOGY MEETING NOTES Page 180 of 403 APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Location: via e-mail People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) Yury Bykau, TR Transportation Consultants, Inc., (239) 278-3090 2) Michael Sawyer. Collier County Transportation, (239) 252-2926 Studv Preparer• Preparer's Name and Title: YM Bykau, Transportation Consultant Organization: TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Address & Telephone Number: (239) 278-3090 2726 Oak Ridge Court. Suite 503 Fort Myers, FL 33901 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sawyer, Transportation Collier County Transportation Planning Department Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sawyer, Transportation Collier County Transportation Planning Department Organization & Telephone Number: (239) 252-2926. Applicant: Applicant's Name: Fort Construction Group Address: Telephone Number: Proposed Development: Name: Parkway Life Church PL20230006785(CU) Location: Southwest corner of Santa Barbara Blvd & Crews Rd Land Use Type: Church ITE Code #: Church LUC 560 Proposed number of development units: The applicant is proposing a church consisting of a total of approximately 23.734 square feet of floor area and 400 seats. Other: N/A Description: Church K:1202300 Octoberl05 Parkway Life of Church Conditional Use Collier CountylMethodologyWethodology Meeting Notes 11-16-2023 doc Page 181 of 403 Zoning: N/A Existing: N/A Comprehensive plan recommendation: N/A Requested: N/A Findings of the Preliminary Study: Project is anticipated to generate approximately 40 net new two-way PM peak hour trips. See the attached trip generation. Attached trip generation also shows Sunday peak hour trip generation number of seats. Study Type: Small Scale TIS ® Minor TIS ❑ Major TIS ❑ Study Area: Boundaries: Santa Barbara Blvd (Link #79.0) based upon the Collier County 2%-2%-3% Significant Impact Criteria. Additional intersections to be analyzed: None Horizon Year(s): 2026 Analysis Time Period(s): AM & PM peak hours Future Off -Site Developments: None Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trip Generation, 11 `h Edition Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None: Pass -by trips: None Internal trips (PUD): None Transmit use: n/a Other: n/a Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: None Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: 2022 AUIR Site -trip generation: ITE Trip Generation 111h Edition — LUC 560 Trip distribution method: By Hand — 45% to/from the north of the site on Santa Barbara Blvd, and 45% to/from the south of the site on Santa Barbara Blvd. Remaining 10% of project traffic was assumed to/from the west of the site on Whitaker Rd. Traffic assignment method: By Hand Traffic growth rate: From comparison of the 2011 & 2022 AUIR's K:12023110 October105 Parkway Life of Church Conditional Use Collier CountylMethodologylMethodology Meeting Notes 11-16-2023 doc Page 182 of 403 Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: Sight distance: Queuing: Access location & configuration: One (1) connection to Crews Road and one (1 connection to Whitaker Rd. Traffic control: Signal system location & progression needs: On -site parking needs: Data Sources: ITE Trip Generation Report, 1 lth Edition Base maps: Prior study reports: Access policy and jurisdiction: Review process: Requirements: Miscellaneous: SIGNATURES Study Preparer Reviewers Applicant K12023110 Octoberi05 Parkway Life of Church Conditional Use Collier CountylMethodologyWethodology Meeting Notes 11-16-2023.doc Page 183 of 403 Trip Generation — Based on Number of Seats Park --►car Life Church Land Use Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Daily (2-way) In Out Total In Out Total Church ITE LUC 560 17 11 28 18 22 40 355 (400 Seats) Trip Generation — Based on Floor Area Parks;•av Life Church Land Use Weekda A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Daily (2-way) In Out Total In Out Total Church ITE LUC 560 4 3 7 6 7 13 179 (23,734 S . Ft.) Sunday Trip Generation Parlinvay Life Church Land Use Sunday Peak Hour of Generator Sunday (2-way) In Out Total Church 93 97 190 884 (400 Seats) Page 184 of 403 TABLES IA, 2A & 3A Page 185 of 403 Z _O J = � V V J � J V 6WL J H � 0. Z Y Z � Q Q v n. z O Fn N � N m 1 z z 11 II U U LL LL F F U U W W O O a m w w O O S 2 Y Y Q S W W IL LL Q d J J F F 0 F Z h U U a z z N F INLU U = li ~ LL 0 a O K y F F- L) W 0 O F fY y IL 2 w IL 2 F- CC O z F- (1) zW C U = LL F LL :) O fn F F U W 0 O F K y a a W O z O U z m 7 LL m z F- cM 0 O 00 0) U) m � U z « « Q UJ 0 � m CO E � K j j Q Y 2 0 a Q r- _ } } ) z Cl. I § ) § S 2 \LL � » » CD - \ § � � § � % \ \ § p § § B $ \ z I ■ o W Z ° 2 ( ) § \ z m z % Q w z § Q a « � IL w \ n CN 2 LLI § ) § \ z - § a 2 § k < n [ § N LL d / « m ) o w z 2 k LL § § s z a. 2 « IL k ( ( ] IL S E § k S « § » \ z § § / W J f I ; a J ■ / z ) M a k ® 2 % 2 U) 2 m r 2= ~ ( m z � ] k m 0lu \ \ / 00 � TABLE M ANNUAL GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS BASED UPON HISTORICAL AUIR DATA ROADWAY SEGMENT Santa Barbara Blvd Davis Blvd to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd 2011 2023 ANNUAL ACTUAL CURRENT AUIR AUIR YRS OF GROWTH GROWTH ID# VOLUME VOLUME GROWTH RATE RATE 790 439 1,010 12 7.19% 7.19% All traffic volumes were obtained from the 2011 & 2023 Annual Update Inventory Reports (AUIR) In instances where the historical data indicates a reduction in traffic or insufficient data was available to calculate A growth rate due to construction, a minimum annual growth rate of 2.0% was assumed. SAMPLE GROWTH RATE CALCULATION 2023 AUIR A(lNrs of Growth) Annual Growth Rate (AGR) _ -1 2011 AUIR 1,010 "(1i12) AGR (Santa Barbara Blvd) _ -1 439 AGR (Santa Barbara Blvd) = 7.19% Page 188 of 403 FIGURES 1 - 3 Page 189 of 403 a IVI CV-6 tryjRd j ED A 1 now 1-77 RI iV11'h`ita ker�iRd - i i, .'t ■ 7N W E S N.T.S. 0 Lo 1v N 00 o CREWS RD �15 (16) [84] cn cq [81] (18) 9� 1 � Ico °v o cq 0 SITE p J qCD L.L Q m Q Co Z Q U) CO M d' Lo t WHITAKER RD ♦ 10%♦ [9] (2) 2 [6] (2) 1 ti N 0 Lo LEGEND ♦ 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 4-(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ♦[000] SUNDAY PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ♦20%♦ PERCENT TRIP DISTRIBUTION 7ATRTRANSPORTATION TRIP DISTRIBUTION & CONSULTANTS, INC SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGMENT PARKWAY LIFE CHURCH PfL9MT4A 7N W E S N.T.S. 1,771 (1,763) [1,763] 0.32% CREWS RD 0 O L�. \0 J qm L.L a m a m a z a WHITAKER RD 1,771 (1,766) [1,761] 0.32% LEGEND 000 2026 CURRENT REMAINING CAPACITY (000) 2026 REMAINING CAPACITY W/ AM PROJECT TRAFFIC [000] 2026 REMAINING CAPACITY W/ PM PROJECT TRAFFIC 0.0% PROJECT IMPACT PERCENTAGE -j TRANSPORTATION 2026 REMAINING CAPACITY ON ;vATRCONSULTANTS, INC SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACTED LINKS PARKWAY LIFE CHURCH AUIR REPORT Page 193 of 403 . Ft II W g ii ii I w ".a '� Q ^:'s W❑ 10 :� L 4 C1:1 U 61 R7 U V Q'9 i m U❑ U- Q :J O :! Q m U C7 m m U :J U67�m tD t➢ 'J D.1 Q Q 9 +-�U ac 3 J d -i— J - - - - - _ A. iQ zi - - �t Y _ - - - n s -� ry -. ^ n i =iv nl .fie a'?f•i na _.c. 'T 1 *~Maa^i��_Y - _ _'a�_a �%a �i ��^�e �a aaii Y q. _ Y.: 3 T - -:Q 5IT o 117 T", llsllz T ITIT c iT Z U, Y N CI 3. = ? v N_ " I N K . n $ r - _- t` n Y a T ? .�� G = _ - M Y V 1- n n_ n_ T J - V � i 1/%i - _ _ 1 �. i ry .^ _ ❑ ao _==vm-.> nip J;�7,1 ry m'T. I. f°t T� IT �-._. Ft n�___T S 3 r _ ��'?.��^c3-=n oo E�z`�li TlTri w.w:u.Ww zzzz.E.nzwWwwwwwwm3www3zzz�zzzz my a mW;y:u..x I wW QQ 70...........:rtmWWgf�q'q OvaO xw¢iQ 0000, O Q o qw n �"�.o� S m i:nliG'::»_n ti 00 %q0 V J Qe J V N fl r-. qR >•I y r�l e e V V 0N14 M QOOOOO QQq Q qQG Q �OCQQ V 77,70 �,7 V O ia qJ (] V H aoE 4; rn'U :J a C t t' O U UXn N N H m F c �� E u U ._ U> a Z m uUw 0Z) U O V U '3 `.j p a s z o � z a v a a e n n n 9 r� 1 i' s1 _,s?oF3mmCll iN N��F9 �'YCs'zlz K1nxo�up m, m9m_aa I�rvrV "I x.e3 2� ry z 1' zz'01 -- N XR evy, Y Y Y Y u Y Si !J U V LJ V V V V U U '-. L) 'J u V U :J U u• U Ui:.J U Ci u 1:� u V U u :.+ 11 y y N 4¢2 ,{ F u � L, u Y :J p :JU F u U U F VIA hl= _ u UU V F h{f- U U UU'-- F- [7 F F H F tUl- F 1V- U 's3a_u 3333:a, L,u uu vuu ZZZ W ZZ::wy ZZz ZZ ZWV WW WSW nin cM O 4- 0 N LL TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS Page 195 of 403 Church (560) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 5 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 23 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 7.60 4.35 - 13.14 3.01 Data Plot and Equation 400 300 w v W W a F 200 i H 100 X X 0 0 10 20 30 40 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 5.40(X) + 50.83 RI= 0.69 Rem General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400-799) 467 Page 196 of 403 Church (560) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 6 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 40 Directional Distribution: 62% entering, 38% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.32 0.08 - 0.94 0.24 Data Plot and Equation so 40 N 30 C W N a F i F 20 10 0 0 100 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA X Study Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.37(X) - 1.84 - - - - - Average Rate RI= 0.81 200 468 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 4 i�¢! Page 197 of 403 Church (560) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 11 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 35 Directional Distribution: 44% entering, 56% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.49 0.21 - 2.10 0.41 Data Plot and Equation 50 40 N 30 W n F- 11 - 20 10 X r X rr r X r r rrr r r rrr r r rrr rr. X r r rrr _X._ --- r Xr rr >0( X X 0 0 100 200 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.36(X) + 4.70 RI= 0.64 QGeneral Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400-799) 469 Page 198 of 403 Church (560) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 4 Avg. Num. of Seats: 524 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Seat Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.90 0.48 - 122 0.28 Data Plot and Equation 1000 800 w 600 c W N n H u H 400 200 X r X i - -- -- -- - - - -- i X 0 0 1000 X = Number of Seats X Study Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.93(X) -16.74 - - - - - Average Rate RI= 0.85 2000 I 476 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 4 R Page 199 of 403 Church (560) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 2 Avg. Num. of Seats: 378 Directional Distribution: 60% entering, 40% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Seat Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.07 0.04 - 0.07 *** Data Plot and Equation 50 X -/ 40 / / / / / m 30 C j W d / I I / 20 / 10 X Caution - Small Sample Sig 0 0 200 400 600 600 X = Number of Seats X Study Site - - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given W= "'''' RIE General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400-799) 477 Page 200 of 403 Church (560) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 4 Avg. Num. of Seats: 439 Directional Distribution: 45% entering, 55% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Seat Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.10 0.01 - 0.22 0.10 Data Plot and Equation 200 W N a H 100 i H X -'� X X v 0 0 200 400 X = Number of Seats X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given 600 600 - - - - - Average Rate Rz_ — 478 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 4 "Ur Page 201 of 403 Church (560) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats On a: Sunday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 1 Avg. Num. of Seats: 1000 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Seat Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 2.21 2.21 -2.21 Data Plot and Equation Caution - Small Sample Size 3000 X 2000 v Lu a F- u F 1000 0 p 1000 2000 X = Number of Seats X Study Site - - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R'= *'* 482 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 4 itu Page 202 of 403 Church (560) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats On a: Sunday, Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 14 Avg. Num. of Seats: 840 Directional Distribution: 49% entering, 51 % exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Seat Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.51 0.21 - 0.89 0.15 Data Plot and Equation 2000 w w a H 1000 X H X X X 'X X X, 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 X = Number of Seats X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.53(X) - 21.83 RI= 0.92 =1 General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400-799) 483 Page 203 of 403 PL20230006785 - ONE LIFE CHURCH ENVIRONMENTAL DATA HEX Package Page 204 of 403 Tropical Environmental Consultants www.TropicalEnvironmenta[Consultants.com 3900 Mannix Dr. #118 Naples, Florida. 34114 "Striving for balance between human use and the environment" since 1983 239-455-6232 -INFORMAL WETLAND DETERMINATION (STEP 1)- FIELD INSPECTION AND DATA REPORT For questions regarding wetland delineation procedures, the need for special permits, or to obtain agency verification of the findings and conclusions presented herein prior to site planning or development, please contact TEC Site PID#: 00404240000, 00404280002, 00426680004 Acres: 14.92 County: Collier Subdivision/legal: 8 50 26 W1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 5 AC OR 443 PG 381, 8 50 26 E1/2 OF SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 5 AC., 17 50 26 W1/2 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS S 30 FT Report authorized to (CLIENT'): (BUYER) Brooks Witcher Agent: NOTAUTHORIZED Inspection date: 11 OCTOBER 2023 Prior agency history identified: 0✓ NO ❑ YES: Inspected by: Asher Williams REGULATORY SUMMARY This report is a 'Step F informal wetland survey. Prior to construction, the recommended next step is: ❑ Step 2 QERP (wetland) permit❑Formal Determination ❑Listed Species Survey ❑Other/TBD-see notes Tropical Environmental Consultants identified 14.84 acres of wetland habitat within the study site excluding perennial surface waters, i.e. canals, lakes, ponds. That portion which is not deemed as wetland, or is comprised of other surface waters, is upland as depicted on the accompanying map found within this report. All findings and conclusions presented herein are informal and non-bindinir, subject to agency review and verification. For questions regarding wetland delineation procedures, the need for special permits, or to obtain agency verification of the findings and conclusions presented herein prior to site planning or development, please contact TEC for further assistance. Will State ff—DEP/WMID) permits or approvals be required to address the presence of wetland habitat within the site? I rJ YES (ERP permit) 12-24 Anticipated permitting time -frame (months) ❑ NO ❑ UNDETERMINED Will Federal(USACE/EPA) permits or approvals be required to address the presence of wetland habitat within the site? ✓ YES (dred a and fill permit) 12-24 Anticipated permitting time -frame (months) ❑ NO UNDETERMINED Were listed species (or evidence thereof) observed on site"? ? ❑ YES 0 NO Local county or city municipalities may require a permit prior to an r mechanical actions or land alteration conducted within a property, regardless of the type, location, or scope. TEC recommends obtaining a verification of these findings with the State, as well as reviewing local rules and regulations with the development/environmental services department of the city or county of jurisdiction prior to ANY site work. I All findings are the sole propern of TEC. and the client named above, and may not be released to un-authorized third parties. 2 The wetland delineation provided in this report was conducted per Florida Department of Environmental Protection (Ch.62-340 of the F.A.C.), and United States Army Corps of Engineers (1987 Wetland Delineation Manual-GACPRS) criteria and is subject to agency verification. 3 TEC did not conduct a listed species survey during completion of this report and therefore does not indicate whether listed species are absent from the site. REPORT VERSION 4/2021 PID: 00404240000, 00404280002, 00426680004 Page 205 of 403 Tropical Environmental Consultants www.TropicalEnvironmentalConsultants.com 3900 Mannix Dr. #118 Naples, Florida. 34114 239-455-6232 inT "Striving for balance between human use and the environment" since 1983 BUILDING SUITABILITY SUMMARY Further explanation of each corresponding question is provided within the "Question Detail" sheet at the conclusion of this report. Q1 Shall a state FDEP/SWFMD and/or federal environmental resource permit authorizing for wetland impacts be required for this property? ❑ NO ❑✓ YES ❑ N/A- Upland Q2 If present, is the on -site wetland isolated, contiguous, or undetermined per State definition? ❑ Isolated ❑✓ Contiguous ❑ Undetermined (may connect offsite) ❑ N/A- Upland Q3 Will compensatory mitigation likely be required? ❑ NO ❑✓ YES COMMENTS: SEE NOTES Q4 If wetlands are impacted, what is the functional quality (UMAM/WRAP/ETC) of the wetland resource, and thus the relative cost of mitigation for these areas? ❑ VERY HIGH ❑ HIGH W] MEDIUM ❑ LOW ❑ VERY LOW ❑N/A- Upland Q5 If wetlands are found on site, what is the anticipated seasonal high water (SHW) elevation during a typical rainy -season, and for how long will near -ground water levels persist? MAJORITY OF SITE 4-6 inches 0 above [:]below ground N/A weeks/year. MINORITY OF SITE 6-8 inches ✓❑ above ❑ below ground N/A weeks/year. Q6 Is limestone located near (6" +-) or above the surface of the lot? ❑✓ NO ❑ YES Q7 Will the property potentially qualify for a reduction of the assessed value, and therefore the taxable value, by local county Property Appraiser due to the presence of wetlands on -site? ❑ NO ❑✓ YES Q8 jAre exotic -nuisance plant species prolific throughout the lot? ❑ NO 0 YES Q9 During completion of the field visit, did TEC biologists witness the presence or evidence of protected (listed) animal species? 0 NO ❑ YES The conclusions presented herein are based on TEC staff interpretation of the rules and procedures set fourth by the regulating agencies contemporaneous with the inspection date. The type of environmental resource permit(s) deemed required (if any) is based upon the anticipated impact footprint for a 2,000 sq. ft. residence and associated structures (unless otherwise noted). An environmental resource permit (ERP), approved variance, or exemption is ALWAYS required when impacting wetlands. Local building departments may accept this report as part of a complete building permit application, however this does not exempt you from the need for additional State/Federal permits or approvals should environmental resources be impacted in fact (please refer to "Question Detail" page Q1 for more information). For State verification please contact TEC, FDEP 239-344-5600, or SFWMD 239-338-2929. SUMMARY NOTES: WETLANDS ARE PRESENT ON A SIGNIFICANT MAJORITY OF THE PARCEL AND CONSTRUCTION ON THE SITE WILL REQUIRE AN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT WITH ASSOCIATED MITIGATION PURCHASES. MITIGATION COSTS ARE ANTICIPATED TO BE AT A MEDIUM VALUE. REPORT VERSION 4/2021 PID: 00404240000, 00404280002, 00426680004 Page 206 of 403 LOCATIONAND LANDSCAPE 6 WA TER ENVIRONMENT, 6 COMMUNITY STRUCTURE:3 Tropical Environmental Consultants www.TropicalEnvironmentalConsultants.com 3900 Mannix Dr. #118 Naples, Florida. 34114 T Site Documentation Photographs- Wetland 41 a D 287°W (T) 0 26.1252430,-81.720325414m • 4m Y 'v7i7ocmt m a* 7R vmozi - _Q7 7wilrazo iAm A rm 7 THE COMPOSITION OF THE WETLANDS IS NEARLY UNIFORM ACROSS THE SITE. SEASONAL HIGH WATER ESTIMATES RANGE FROM +4 TO +8 INCHES WITHIN THE WETLANDS ON EACH PARCEL. REPORT VERSION 412021 PID: 00404240000, 00404280002, 00426680004 Page 207 of 403 m Tropical Environmental Consultants www.TropicalEnvironmentalConsultants.com 3900 Mannix Dr. #118 Upland -Wetland Determination Map Naples, Florida. 34114 (approximate- subject to agency verification) 239-455-6232 subject study area Data Point wetland per State and/or Federal wetland criteria. NOTE: The wetland area delineated on the map provided herein is approximate and subject to verification by the appropriate local, State, and/or Federal agencies. Drainage ditches. if present, are shown as linear features and are typically exempted from permitting requirements. uo�,,,.my:� Tropical Environmental Consultants ;' 3900 Mannix Or. Ste. 118 Naples FL, 34114 Nnne* w. - - rultants.com • A r NOW I L i M MM"I I iT. A K I■ REPORT VERSION 4/2021 PID: 00404240000, 00404280002, 00426680004 Page 208 of 403 Tropical Environmental Consultants www.TropicalEnvironmentalConsultants.com 3900 Mannix Dr. #118 Naples, Florida. 34114 239-455-6232 TM "Striving for balance between human use and the environment" since 1983 Flood Zone Map (FEMA) Selected Custom Parcels Streets Mapwlse County Boundaries Parcel Outlines © V - 100-year, wave action, BFE no © VE - 100-year, wave action, BFE yes A - 100-year, BFE no AE - 100-year, BFE yes 0 AN - 100-year, ponding, BFE yes 0 AO - 100-year, sheet flow, BFE yes 0 X500 - 500-year 0 D - undetermined, possible hazard ED AN[ - Area Not Included 0 X - Outside any floodplains - - M,1 r REPORT VERSION 412021 PID: 00404240000, 00404280002, 00426680004 Page 209 of 403 Owner and Property Description Owner Name: � PARKWAY LIFE CHURCH OF GOD j 5S75 GOLDEN GATE PKWY Maldmg Address•; j MAPLES FL 34116 USA Site Address: NAPLES FL 34112 Subdivision: A--REAGE HEADER Courtly: COLLIER h Land Use Code: SS LAM Use Dealt: Acreage not Zoned agrs:u aura: Land Use FDOR Code. LAM Use FDOR Disc: Acwse not zoned agnmitura! � Zoning: Acres: 501 PIN: OW4280D02 P012: 404280002 ALTKEY: 000100 041 05508 Last Data Update:, 0Ag2023 I Legal Description snot official) 8 50 28 W12 OF SE IM OF SE114 OF SE1114 5 AC CR 443 PG 381 Owner and Property Description Owner Name: PARKWAY LIFE CHURCH OF 04 .5976 GOLDEN GATE PKWY Meiling Address: MAPLES FL 34116 USA S!te Addma: MAPLES FL 34112 SubdM21oli: ; ACREAGE HEADER County., COLLIER _ Land Use Code: 166 Land Use Disc:: Acreage not zcne6 agdcudural Land Use FDOR I88 Code: Land Use UeAcreage not zoned agriciltura! Zoning: Acres: 15.01 PIN:i00404240000 PIN2: 404240000 ALTKEN ! 00(11100 040 Mile Last Data Update: 110'592023 f Legal Description (trot official) 18 50 26 E12 OF SWIM OF SE114 OF SE1/4 5 AC. Tropical Environmental Consultants www.TropicalEnvironmenta[Consultants.com 3900 Mannix Dr. #118 Naples, Florida. 34114 239-455-6232 Property Tax Data Details (Obtained from local property appraiser) Parcel Map Parcel Map LA 61F:a i O11mer and Property Descriptions Owner Name: PARK4i'AY LIFE CHURCH OF GOD r 5075 GOLDEN GATE PARK:YAY ! Maift Address:l ! NAPLES FL34116 USA Site Address: ! NAPLES FL 34112 Sulwtivisidn: ! ACREAGE HEADER County: COLLIER Lend Use Code: "0r Land Use Dear. Vaca:M ResidaI Land Use FDOR Do Code: Land Use FOOR ; Va=1 Residentiai Desc:' Zoning: r�—Acres: ; 4.60 r PIN:' 00'4256 .643 PIN2: 4MW1104 ALTKEY: ; 000100 014 ,d817 Last Date Update: 118/062023 Legal Description (not official) 117 50 26 W 12 OF N£114 OF NE114 OF NEI14 LESS S 30 FT Parcel Map REPORT VERSION 412021 PID: 00404240000, 00404280002, 00426680004 Page 210 of 403 I11111111111' 1111111111 I I I I I I III III[[ ISI l I[IIII IIIIIIIII I 111111111 11111� I I 31§ denotes the Rule, subsection,�m23Is7gI 11111121I 14151 paragraph, or subparagraph FDEP SLERC August 2019 Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form referenced from Ch. 62-340, F.A.C. 1. Date: SEE RPRT 2. Staff Present: SEE RPRT 4. County: SEE RPRT 6. Point ID: SEE RPRT 5. Site Name: SEE RPRT GPS Coordinates: 7. Distances and bearings from fixed objects (if no GPS): NIA 8. Current condition of described point: O Authorized or legal condition 9. Work type: (`) Identification (F,, Delineation Point status: 1!, Wetland O Non -Wetland Surface Water 3. Form recorder(s): SEE RPT Tracking #: C) Unauthorized or illegal condition Upland 10. Vegetative Stratum §62-340.400: Using §62-340.400, F.A.C. with reasonable scientific judgment, select the appropriate vegetative stratum. (Do not include FAC species when determining 10% minimum areal extent.) (,Canopy (Min. 10% areal extent) CSubcanopy (Min. 10% areal extent) OGroundcover (No min. areal extent) (_-)Vegetation Absent (skip to #14) (:� Evaluation Impossible (skip to #14) Why? 11. Plant List §62-340.200(2),(6),(16), §62-340.400, §62-340.450, F.A.C.: Areal extent As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations: I estimator: Select and identify plants in an area just large enough to represent and classify the plant community at the described point. Do not extend into different communities or hydrologic conditions. 3. For each species present in the I. Record the scientific name (binomial) 2. Record the percent areal stratum selected in #10, transfer and status of each plant species extent in the canopy, the numbers from only that necessary to identify/delineate and classify subcanopy, and groundcover stratum's column into the the plant community in the selected area. columns for each species. appropriate status columns. # Binomial of Observed Species Status Canopy Subcanopy Groundcover Upland Facultative Fac. Wet Obligate 1. Taxodium sp. CYPRESS 0 5 5 2. Pinus elliottii U 10 10 3. Chrysobalanus Taco FW 15 4. Acacia auriculiformes F 20 5 5 20 5. Melaleuca q. F 45 5 45 6. JTelmatoblechnum serrulatum FW 15 7. 8. - 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. - 20. - Percent areal extent totals for the stratum selected in question 10 10 65 0 5 12. In the stratum selected in #10: What is the % areal extent of Obligate plants? 5 What is the % areal extent of Upland plants? 10 Is the areal extent of Obligate plants greater than that of Upland plants? QYes t:- No 13. In the stratum selected in #10: What is the total % areal extent of Obligate & Facultative Wet plants combined? 5 What is the total % areal extent of Obligate, Facultative Wet, & Upland plants combined? 15 What is the percentage of 0131- + FACW in relation to all plants, excluding FAC? (osL F+FACW UPL) 33.3% Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effective date) Page 1 of 6 Page 211 of 403 Point ID/Location: SEE RPT Soil describer: SEE RPT 14. LRR/MLRA U Textures: Peat, Mucky Peat, Muck, Mucky Mineral (S or F), Sand, Fine, Marl 15. Is a soil profile evaluation possible? C�> Yes 0 No If no, why? (if No, skip to #18) 16. Soil Description: As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations Soil surface, or 0 inch depth for purposes of Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. is the muck or mineral surface (whether natural or fill) for sandy ' Describe soil features: DA (areas darker than matrix), LA (areas lighter than matrix), beginning moist matrix /° RC (redox concentrations): Record in moist condition hue valueichroma; volume in to ending Matrix condition horizons w/ horizon; boundaries (sharp/clear/diffuse); shape (rounded/linear/angular). Horizon Depth Texture Matrix value <_ 3: ° " OB (organic bodies): Record texture (muck or mucky mineral), /o volume in horizon. H2S Indicate depth detected (inches) Hue Value/ % Organic - (hydrogen sulfide odor): shallowest where "Textures" Chroma Coating _ Note if horizon is Physically Mixed (PM), Nonsoil (any material not listed in above), or Fill and describe. ORGANIC BODIES 1 0-3 MM 12 9R LA 10YR 8/1 25% ROUND DIFFUSE 2 3-13 S 1OYR 7/1 4 5 6 17. Hydric Soil Field Indicators: If present, check all Hydric Soil Field Indicators satisfied and specify their beginning 0 All Texture 0 Sandy Texture 0 Fine Texture and ending depths (All) Histosol* _(S4) Sandy Gleyed Matrix* _(F2) Loamy Gleyed Matrix* Indicator Begin End Present Depth Depth A2 Histic E f edon* S5 Sandy Redox F3 Depleted Matrix (A3) Black Histic* ✓ (S6) Stripped Matrix _(F6) Redox Dark Surface 3 13 2 S6 (A4) Hydrogen Sulfide* Dark Surface _(F7) Depleted Dark Surface _(S7) (A5) Stratified Layers* _(S8) Polyvalue Below Surface _(F8) Redox Depression 3. - (A6) Organic Bodies _(S9) Thin Dark Surface _(F10) Marl 4. (A7) 5cm Mucky Mineral* _(S12) Barrier Islands 1cm Muck _(F12) Iron -Manganese Masses 5. (A8) Muck Presence* _(F13) Umbric Surface 6. (A9) lcm Muck* _(F22) Very Shallow Dark Surface (All) Depleted Below Dark Surface * = Stand-alone D Test- both hydric soil To combine layers/indicators to meet thickness (Al2) Thick Dark Surface and hydrologic indicator i requirements, see NRCS Hydric Soils Technical Note 4. 18. Excluding organic horizons, is any nonsoil horizon present at or within the uppermost 12 inches of the ground surface? )Yes (e.g. bedrock, rock outcrop, limestone fill, gravel, etc) C} No (a Soil profile or site inaccessible 19. Is one or more hydric soil field indicators present? C-uYes (77;No r Inconclusive (e.g., evaluation to 12+inches If no or inconclusive, is the soil hydric as determined b other NRCS methods? impeded by disturbance,access,water, y Y nonsoil, no site access, etc.) (1 Yes <- Which method(s)? (,, No (, Inconclusive � Why? (e.g., hydric soil definition, HSTS2 indicator present at drier elevation, indicator would be present but for disturbance) 20. Is the depth of the soil profile 20 inches or greater from the soil surface? C) Yes (:, No If no, depth of soil profile is: 13 inches Why? (e.g., root refusal, nonsoil, water table, loose sand, heavy texture, compaction, weather conditions, inspection interrupted) 21. Observed height or depth of standing water from soil surface: inches CAbove (--)Below C Not Observed Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effective date) Page 2 of 6 Page 212 of 403 Point ID/Location: Indicator evaluator: 22. Hydrologic Indicators: As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations Hydrologic Indicators Present per §62-340.500, F.A.C. at or (and as applied to §62-340.600, F.A.C.) point Predicted during normal high water or wet season* Within 1. Describe the type of all checked indicators. 100 ft 2. Approximate the distance and compass direction of waterward indicators within 100 ft of the point. of point 3. For water level indicators (potential indicators denoted (not for by *) note the height from ground surface at the point upland as well as waterward (with distance from point). points) *Only for indicators not present due to dry season/drought (1) Algal mats* (2) Aquatic mosses or liverworts* (3) Aquatic plants* (4) Aufwuchs (5) Drift lines and rafted debris* (6) Elevated lichen lines* (7) Evidence of aquatic fauna (8) Hydrologic data* (9) Morphological plant adaptations* (10) Secondary flow channels (11) Sediment deposition* (12) Tussocks or hummocks* (13) Water marks* (,Above Ground Surface (j No Water Level Indicators Highest water level indicator height at point: 4 inches (F)Above Soil Surface C')N/A (described point is Upland) 23. Is one or more hydrologic indicator(s) listed in §62-340.500, F.A.C. present or predicted with normal high water or wet season conditions at the described point? CFYes 0 No (—j Evaluation Impossible � Why? 24. Delineation by Wetland Definition §62-340.300(1), F.A.C. As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ' or the legality of any alterations: a) Has a wetland boundary been delineated at the described point? Cc Yes 0, No (If No, skip to #25) b) If yes to 24a, can the boundary be easily delineated using the definition of wetlands? 0 Yes No 26. A & B Test Wetland Criteria §62-340.300(2)(a),(b), F.A.C. As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations: a) Is the areal extent of Obligate plants in the stratum selected in #10 greater than the areal extent of all Upland plants in that stratum? (See #12) C. Yes (�Z No C iVegetation Absent (skip to #250 ('Evaluation Impossible (skip to #26a) b) Is the areal extent of Obligate and/or Facultative Wet plants in the stratum selected in #10 equal to or greater than 80% of all the plants in that stratum, excluding Facultative plants? (See #13) 0 Yes C No c) Is the soil hydric as identified using standard NRCS definitions and practices? (see #19) CYes (7;No (' Indeterminable with current conditions - Why? d) Is the substrate composed of riverwash, nonsoil (see #18), rock outcrop -soil complex, or is the substrate located within an artificially created wetland area? (`,Yes C, No If yes, which condition is present? e) Is one or more of the hydrologic indicators in §62-340.500, F.A.C. present at the described point? (See #23) (FYes O No f) Are the A Test criteria met per §62-340.300(2)(a), F.A.C. at the described point? C'°Yes (Z No (Note: if yes to 25a and yes to either 25c, 25d, or 25e, A Test criteria are met) g) Are the B Test criteria met per §62-340.300(2)(b), F.A.C. at the described point? ('. Yes (, No (Note: If yes to 25b and yes to either 25c, 25d, or 25e, B Test criteria are met) h) Are there any alterations or conditions affecting reliable application of the A or B Test such that the Altered Sites Test is more appropriate? C�Yes C N o Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effective date) Page 3 of E Page 213 of 403 Point ID/Location: 26. C Test Wetland Criteria §62-340.300(2)(c), F.A.C. As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations: a) Per §62-340.300(2)(c), F.A.C. is the described point Pine Flatwoods or Improved Pasture, or does it have drained soils? C Yes (7, No If yes, select which of the following are met, then skip to #26d Pine Flatwoods ❑ Improved Pasture ® Drained Soils Pine Flatwoods must have flat terrain, a monotypic or mixed canopy of long leaf pine or slash pine, and a ground cover dominated by saw palmetto with other species that are NOT obligate or facultative wet. Improved Pasture means areas where the dominant native plant community has been replaced with planted or natural recruitment of herbaceous species which are NOT obligate or facultative wet species and which have been actively maintained for livestock through mechanical means or grazing. Drained Soils are those in which permanent alterations, excluding mechanical pumping, preclude the fonnation of hydric soils. b) Are the soils at the described point saline sands (salt flats -tidal flats), or have they been field verified by NRCS's Keys to Soil Taxonomy (4th ed. 1990) as Umbraqualfs, Sulfaquents, Hydraquents, Humaquepts, Histosols (except Folists), Argiaquolls, or Umbraquults? GYes ('� No c) Do the soils at the described point have a NRCS hydric soil field indicator (see #17), and is the point located within a map unit named or designated by the NRCS as frequently flooded, depressional, or water? Map Unit: C`Yes n No r,, Inconclusive —Why? (skip to #27a)' d) Are the C Test criteria met per §62-340.300(2)(c), F.A.C. at the described point? C Yes (7) No (Note: if no to 26a and yes to either 26b or 26c, C Test criteria are met) e) Are there any alterations or conditions affecting reliable application of the C Test such that the Altered Sites Test is more appropriate? Yes T} No 27. D Test Wetland Criteria §62-340.300(2)(d), F.A.C. As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations: a) Is the soil hydric as verified by a NRCS hydric soil field indicator? (See #17) C:, Yes (' No (skip to #27d) 0Inconclusive F Why? (skip to #28) b) Does any NRCS hydric soil field indicator begin at the soil surface or are any of the following indicators present: A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A7, A8, A9, S4, F2? (e''Yes (-,No (If yes, then hydrologic indicator§62-340.500(8) or (11) is met) c) Is one or more of the hydrologic indicators in §62-340.500, F.A.C. present at the described point? (See #23) (:,Yes ('dNo d) Are the D Test criteria met per §62-340.300(2)(d), F.A.C. at the described point? ( Yes ONo (Note: if yes to 27a and yes to either 27b or 27c, D Test criteria may be met) e) Are there any alterations or conditions affecting reliable application of the D Test such that the Altered Sites Test is more appropriate? (j Yes rt, No 28. Altered Sites Tests §62-340.300(3), F.A.C. (Legal/Authorized or Illegal/Unauthorized) For purposes of Chapter 62-340, F.A. C. altered refers to any natural or man -induced condition(s) which masks or eliminates reliable expression of wetland indicators (i.e. hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and hydrologic indicators). Unaltered or normal does not require a natural condition, only an expression of wetland indicators that is sufficient to reliably identify or delineate the wetland using the criteria in §62-340.300, F.A. C. Are alterations affecting normal wetland condition? C'- Yes C,No (skip to #32) ()Evaluation Impossible (skip to #32) 29. Authorized or Legally Altered Vegetation and Soils Test Criteria §62-340.300(3)(a), F.A.C. a) Are there authorized or legal alterations affecting reliable expression of vegetation at the described point? 0 Yes C No If yes, how? b) Are there authorized or legal alterations affecting reliable soil evaluation at the described point? )Yes )No If yes, how? (if no to both 29a and 29b, skip to #30) c) If yes to 29a or 29b, which criteria tests are affected by the legal alterations? ❑ A Test ❑ B Test © C Test ❑ D Test d) Using the most reliable available information and reasonable scientific judgment, would the types of evidence and characteristics contemplated in §62-340.300, F.A.C. identify or delineate the described point as a wetland with cessation of the legal altering activities? ('Yes (-No If no, why? (If no, skip to #30) e) If yes to 29d, what §62-340.300, F.A.C. evidence is present now and/or will be present in the future with cessation of legal altering activities? ❑ Plants ❑ Soils ❑ Hydrologic indicators f) If yes to 29d, which tests would be passed with cessation of legal altering activities? ❑ Wetland Definition ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test Why? Page 4 of 6 Page 214 of 403 Point ID/Location: 30. Authorized or Legally Altered Hydrology Test Criteria §62-340.300(3)(b), F.A.C. a) Has wetland hydrology of the area been legally drained or lowered? CYes C No (if no, skip to #31) If yes, how? b) Has wetland hydrology been legally eliminated at the described point? C Yes 0 No (if no, skip to #31) c) if yes to 30b, using reasonable scientific judgment or §62-340.550, F.A.C., have dredging or filling activities authorized by Part IV of Chapter 373. F.S. permanently eliminated wetland hydrology at the described point such that the wetland definition cannot be met? ClYes (point is upland) C No (if yes, skip to #31) Chapter 373, F. S. Part 11 activities (e.g., water use permits) or other temporary hydrologic alterations (e.g., surface water pumps, drought) do not apply to this or any other Ch. 62-340, F.A.C. determinations. d) If no to 30c, what §62-340.300, F.A.G. evidence is present now and/or will be present in the future with cessation of temporary hydrologic drainage? ❑ Plants ❑ Soils ❑ Hydrologic indicators e) If no to 30c, Which tests would be passed with cessation of temporary hydrologic alterations? 17 Wetland Definition ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test Why? 31. Unauthorized or Illegally Altered Sites Test Criteria §62-340.300(3)(c), F.A.C. if the altering activity is a violation of regulatory requirements, then application of §62-340.300(3)(c), F.A. C. and all provisions of Chapter 62-340, F.A. C. are utilized to identify or delineate the wetland in a forensic manner. This identification or delineation reflects the condition immediately prior to the unauthorized alteration. a) Have any unauthorized alterations affected the normal wetland condition at the described point? (--)Yes CNo If yes, how? (if no, skip to #32) b) If yes to 31 a, which criteria tests are affected by the unauthorized alterations? A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test c) With reasonable scientific judgment is the described point a wetland, or would it have been a wetland immediately prior to the unauthorized alteration? (7-1Yes C No If no, why? (if no, skip to #32) d) If yes to 31 c, what §62-340.300, F.A.C. evidence is present now and/or was present immediately prior to the unauthorized alteration? ❑ Plants ❑ Soils ❑ Hydrologic indicators e) If yes to 31 c, which tests would be passed immediately prior to the unauthorized alteration? ❑ Wetland Definition ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test Why? 32. Wetland and Other Surface Water Summary §62-340.600(2)(a-e), F.A.C.: Given normal expression, cessation of authorized alterations, or immediately prior to any unauthorized alterations: a) With reasonable scientific judgment is the described point a wetland as defined in §62-340.200(19), F.A.C. and located by Ch. 62-340, F.A.C.? C}Yes )No If yes, which criteria identified or delineated the wetland? ® Wetland Definition ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ® D Test If summary answers differ from answers in 25f, 25g, 26d, or 27d, why? b) Is the described point located at or within the Mean High Water Line of a tidal water body? C-Yes CNo (7.MHWL Unknown c) Is the described point located at or within the Ordinary High Water Line of a non -tidal natural water body or natural watercourse? CYes C No d) Is the described point located at or within the top of the bank of an artificial lake, borrow pit, canal, ditch, or other type of artificial water body or watercourse with side slopes of 1 foot vertical to 4 feet horizontal or steeper, excluding spoil banks when the canals and ditches have resulted from excavation into the ground? (71Yes C No e) is the described point located at or within the Seasonal High Water Line of an artificial lake, borrow pit, canal, ditch, or other type of artificial water body or watercourse with side slopes flatter than 1 foot vertical to 4 feet horizontal or an artificial water body created by diking or impoundment above the ground? C, Y e s (F, No 33. Connection or Isolation of Wetland per Applicant's Handbook Vol.1 Section 2.0 If the described point is a wetland, does it have a connection via wetlands or other surface waters, or is it wholly surrounded by uplands and therefore isolated? C Connected C Isolated C N/A (Point is not wetland) Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effective date) Page 5 of 6 Page 215 of 403 Point ID/Location: 34. Photographs and/or videos: Soil profile with Data Form, Soil profile close-up, Cross section(s) at 6" depth for sandy textures and/or critical depths for fine textures, Hydric soil indicators, Water table or inundation depth, Four cardinal directions of plant strata present, Hydrologic indicators (with scale as necessary), Critical plant ID (optional) # Memory Card # / Metadata j Description, compass direction (if applicable) Taken By 2. 3. 14. Notes: See Site Documentation - WETLAND Helpful Definitions for Applying Gh 62-340, F.A.G. iRSJ stands for Reasonable Scientific Judgment where used throughout this Data Form (See The Florida Wetlands Delineation Manual pg. 2 & 12) ZHSTS stands for Hydric Soils Technical Standard (See NRCS Hydric Soils Technical Note 11) Definition from §62.340.200(19) Florida Administrative Code "Wetlands," as defined in subsection 373.019(17), F.S., means those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or ground water at a frequency and a duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soils. Soils present in wetlands generally are classified as hydric or alluvial, or possess characteristics that are associated with reducing soil conditions. The prevalent vegetation in wetlands generally consists of facultative or obligate hydrophytic macrophytes that are typically adapted to areas having soil conditions described above These species, due to morphological, physiological, or reproductive adaptations, have the ability to grow, reproduce or persist in aquatic environments or anaerobic soil conditions. Florida wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bayheads, bogs, cypress domes and strands, sloughs, wet prairies, riverine swamps and marshes, hydric seepage slopes, tidal marshes, mangrove swamps and other similar areas. Florida wetlands generally do not include longleaf or slash pine flatwoods with an understory dominated by saw palmetto. Definition from §373.019(19) Florida Statutes "Surface water" means water upon the surface of the earth, whether contained in bounds created naturally or artificially or diffused. Water from natural springs shall be classified as surface water when it exits from the spring onto the earth's surface. Definition from §373.019(14) Florida Statutes "Other watercourse" means any canal, ditch, or other artificial watercourse in which water usually flows in a defined bed or channel. It is not essential that the flowing be uniform or uninterrupted. Definition from §62.340.200(15) Florida Administrative Code "Seasonal High Water" means the elevation to which the ground and surface water can be expected to rise due to a normal wet season. From The Florida Wetlands Delineation Manual pg. 37 Ordinary high water is that point on the slope or bank where the surface water from the water body ceases to exert a dominant influence on the character of the surrounding vegetation and soils. The OHWL frequently encompasses areas dominated by non -listed vegetation and non-hydric soils. When the OHWL is not at a wetland edge, the general view of the area may present an "upland" appearance. Definition from §403.803(14) Florida Statutes "Swale" means a manmade trench which: (a) Has a top width -to -depth ratio of the cross-section equal to or greater than 6:1, or side slopes equal to or greater than 3 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical; (b) Contains contiguous areas of standing or flowing water only following a rainfall event; (c) Is planted with or has stablized vegetation suitable for soil stabilization, stormwater treatment, and nutrient uptake; and (d) Is designed to take into acount the soil erodibility, soil percolation, slope, slope length, and drainage area so as to prevent erosion and reduce pollutant concentration of any discharge. Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effective date) Page 6 of 6 Page 216 of 403 il 1111I1111 I111111111 111111I1111 i I II I I I I I f I I1I I( I I I I I II I III 111111111I 111111 1 111111111 111111111 l 11111111I 111111111 111111111111111 11111I 111111111 I § denotes the Rule, subsection,cm1 2 3f C5II 1,11111 paragraph, or subparagraph FDEP SLERC August 2019 Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form referenced from Ch. 62-340, F.A.C. 1. Date: SEE RPRT 2. Staff Present: SEE RPRT 3. Form recorder(s): SEE RPT 4. County: SEE RPRT 5. Site Name: SEE RPRT Tracking #: 6. Point ID: SEE RPRT GPS Coordinates: 7. Distances and bearings from fixed objects (if no GPS): N/A 8. Current condition of described point: 0 Authorized or legal condition O Unauthorized or illegal condition 9. Work type: (`) Identification C, Delineation Point status: (; Wetland (7)Non-Wetland Surface Water Upland 10. Vegetative Stratum §62-340.400: Using §62-340.400, F.A.C. with reasonable scientific judgment, select the appropriate vegetative stratum. (Do not include FAC species when determining 10% minimum areal extent.) (:tCanopy (Min. 10% areal extent) QSubcanopy (Min. 10% areal extent) (J Groundcover (No min. areal extent) (Vegetation Absent (skip to #14) C) Evaluation Impossible (skip to #14) Why? 11. Plant List §62-340.200(2),(6),(16), §62-340.400, §62-340.450, F.A.C.: Areal extent As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations: estimator: Select and identify plants in an area just large enough to represent and classify the plant community at the described point. I Do not extend into different communities or hydrologic conditions. 3. For each species present in the 1. Record the scientific name (binomial) 2. Record the percent areal stratum selected in #10, transfer and status of each plant species extent in the canopy, the numbers from only that necessary to identify/delineate and classify subcanopy, and groundcover stratum's_.column into the the plant community in the selected area. columns for each species. appropriate status columns. # I Binomial of Observed Species Status Canopy; Subcanopy Groundcover Upland Facultative Fac. Wet Obligate 1. Taxodium sp. CYPRESS O 5 5 2. Pinus elliottii . U 10 10 3. Chrysobalanus iaco FW 15 4. Acacia auriculiformes F 20 5 5 20 5. Melaleuca q. F 45 5 45 6. Telmatoblechnum serrulatum FW 15 7. 8. 9. 10.1 - 11.' 12. 13.1 14. 15. 16. 17.1 18. 19. 20.1 Percent areal extent totals for the stratum selected in question 10 10 65 0 5 12. In the stratum selected in #10: What is the % areal extent of Obligate plants? 5 What is the % areal extent of Upland plants? 10 Is the areal extent of Obligate plants greater than that of Upland plants? (',Yes ( No 13. In the stratum selected in #10: What is the total % areal extent of Obligate & Facultative Wet plants combined? 5 What is the total % areal extent of Obligate, Facultative Wet, & Upland plants combined? 15 What is the percentage of OBL + FACW in relation to all plants, excluding FAC? (osL FACw uPL) 33.3% Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effective date) Page 1 of 6 Page 217 of 403 Point ID/Location: SEE RPT Soil describer: SEE RPT 14. LRR/MLRA U Textures: Peat, Mucky Peat, Muck, Mucky Mineral (S or F), Sand, Fine, Marl 16. Is a soil profile evaluation possible? (?-)Yes r, No If no, why? (if No, skip to #18) 16. Soil Description: As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations Soil surface, or 0 inch depth for urposes of Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. is the muck or mineral surface (whether natural or fill) far sandy - Describe soil features: DA (areas darker than matrix), LA (areas lighter than matrix), beginning moist matrix RC (redox concentrations): Record in moist condition hue value/chroma; % volume in to ending Matrix condition horizons w/ horizon; boundaries (sharp/clear/diffuse); shape (rounded/linear/angular). Horizon Depth Texture Matrix value:5 3: - OB (organic bodies): Record texture (muck or mucky mineral), /e volume in horizon. (inches) Hue Value/ o �o Organic - H2S (hydrogen sulfide odor): Indicate shallowest depth where detected Chroma Coating _ Note if horizon is Physically Mixed (PM), Nonsoil (any material not listed in "Textures" above), or Fill and describe. 1 0-3 MM 12OYR ORGANIC BODIES 2 3-13 LA 10YR 8/1 25% ROUND DIFFUSE S 10YR 7/1 3 4 5 6 I 17. Hydric Soil Field Indicators: If present, check all Hydric Soil Field Indicators satisfied and specify their beginning 0 All Texture 0 Sandy Texture Z Fine Texture and ending depths (Al) Histosol* _(S4) Sandy Gleyed Matrix* _(F2) Loamy Gleyed Matrix* Indicator Begin End Present Depth Depth (A2) Histic Epipedon* _(S5) Sandy Redox _(F3) Depleted Matrix 1. A6 0 3 /CG\ M...J.... 1'1.,.1, C...-F.,.... lnJj U CIUR 1 IIALR, V wv/ V U IHPUM MQU In (A4) Hydrogen Sulfide* _(S7) Dark Surface (A5) Stratified Layers* _(S8) Polyvalue Below Surface (A6) Organic Bodies _(S9) Thin Dark Surface (A7) 5cm Mucky Mineral* _(S12) Barrier Islands 1cm Muck (A8) Muck Presence* (A9) 1cm Muck* (Al1) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al2) Thick Dark Surface _(F7) Depleted Dark Surface _(F8) Redox Depression _(F10) Marl _(F12) Iron -Manganese Masses _(F13) Umbric Surface _(F22) Very Shallow Dark Surface * = Stand-alone D Test- both hydric soil 1 combine layers/indicators to meet thickness and hydrologic indicator requirements, see NRCS Hydric Soils Technical Note 4. 2. S6 3. 4. 5. 6. 3 13 18. Excluding organic horizons, is any nonsoil horizon present at or within the uppermost 12 inches of the ground surface? C� Yes (e.g. bedrock, rock outcrop, limestone fill, gravel, etc) C� No Soil profile or site inaccessible 19. Is one or more hydric soil field indicators present? Ce;Yes (--)No 0Inconclusive (e.g., evaluation to 12+inches If no or inconclusive, is the soil hydric as determined by other NRCS methods? nonsoil no siteta ccessse water, (}Yes (-- Which method(s)? No CInconclusive E- Why? (e.g., hydric soil definition, HSTS2, indicator present at drier elevation, indicator would be present but for disturbance) 20. Is the depth of the soil profile 20 inches or greater from the soil surface? Q Yes r No If no, depth of soil profile is: 13 inches Why? (e.g., root refusal, nonsoil, water table, loose sand, heavy texture, compaction, weather conditions, inspection interrupted) 21. Observed height or depth of standing water from soil surface: inches (-',,Above (--� Below (7 Not Observed Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form I Page 2 of 6 Page 218 of 403 Point ID/Location: Indicator evaluator: 22. Hydrologic Indicators: As is undercurrent conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations Predicted Within 1. Describe the type of all checked indicators. Hydrologic Indicators Present during 100 ft 2. Approximate the distance and compass direction of per §62-340.500, F.A.C. at or normal high waterward indicators within 100 ft of the point. of point 3. For water level indicators (potential indicators denoted (and as applied to §62-340.600, F.A.C.) point water or (not for by *) note the height from ground surface at the point wet upland as well as waterward (with distance from point). season* points) *Only for indicators not present due to dry season/drought (1) Algal mats* (2) Aquatic mosses or liverworts* (3) Aquatic plants* (4) Aufwuchs (5) Drift lines and rafted debris* (6) Elevated lichen lines* (7) Evidence of aquatic fauna (8) Hydrologic data* (9) Morphological plant adaptations* (10) Secondary flow channels (11) Sediment deposition* (12) Tussocks or hummocks* (13) Water marks* Above Ground Surface oNo Water Level Indicators 4 Highest water level indicator height at point: inches CmAbove Soil Surface G N/A (described point is Upland) 23. Is one or more hydrologic indicator(s) listed in §62-340.500, F.A.C. present or predicted with normal high water or wet season conditions at the described point? (�-)Yes G No G Evaluation Impossible E- Why? 24. Delineation by Wetland Definition §62-340.300(l), F.A.C. As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations: a) Has a wetland boundary been delineated at the described point? C, Yes C No (if No, skip to #25) b) If yes to 24a, can the boundary be easily delineated using the definition of wetlands? C Yes (7} No 26. A & B Test Wetland Criteria §62-340.300(2)(a),(b), F.A.C. As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations: a) Is the areal extent of Obligate plants in the stratum selected in #10 greater than the areal extent of all Upland plants in that stratum? (See #12) C Yes Cc No C Vegetation Absent (skip to #250 C}Evaluation Impossible (skip to #26a) b) Is the areal extent of Obligate and/or Facultative Wet plants in the stratum selected in #10 equal to or greater than 80% of all the plants in that stratum, excluding Facultative plants? (See #13) G Yes ( -a No c) Is the soil hydric as identified using standard NRCS definitions and practices? (see #19) (: Yes (-`No Ct Indeterminable with current conditions E- Why? d) Is the substrate composed of riverwash, nonsoil (see #18), rock outcrop -soil complex, or is the substrate located within an artificially created wetland area? (, Yes (<', No If yes, which condition is present? e) Is one or more of the hydrologic indicators in §62-340.500, F.A.C. present at the described point? (See #23) (70:;Yes -No f) Are the A Test criteria met per §62-340.300(2)(a), F.A.C. at the described point? C-Yes O No (Note: If yes to 25a and yes to either 25c, 25d, or 25e, A Test criteria are met) g) Are the B Test criteria met per §62-340.300(2)(b), F.A.G. at the described point? G Yes C:,- No (Note: if yes to 25b and yes to either 25c, 25d, or 25e, B Test criteria are met) h) Are there any alterations or conditions affecting reliable application of the A or B Test such that the Altered Sites Test is more appropriate? (--.Yes r:..No Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effective date) Page 3 of 6 Page 219 of 403 Point ID/Location: 26. C Test Wetland Criteria §62-340.300(2)(c), F.A.C. As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ' or the legality of any alterations: a) Per §62-340.300(2)(c), F.A.G. is the described point Pine Flatwoods or Improved Pasture, or does it have drained sails? C Yes r No if yes, select which of the following are met, then skip to #26d © Pine Flatwoods ❑ Improved Pasture ❑ Drained Soils Pine F/atwoods must have fiat terrain, a monotypic or mixed canopy of long leaf pine or slash pine, and a ground cover dominated by saw palmetto with other species that are NOT obligate or facultative wet. Improved Pasture means areas where the dominant native plant community has been replaced with planted or natural recruitment of herbaceous species which are NOT obligate or facultative wet species and which have been actively maintained for livestock through mechanical means or grazing. Drained Soils are those in which permanent alterations, excluding,mechanical.pumL.)ing, preclude the formation of hydric soils. b) Are the soils at the described point saline sands (salt flats -tidal flats), or have they been field verified by NRCS's Keys to Soil Taxonomy (4th ed. 1990) as Umbraqualfs, Sulfaquents, Hydraquents, Humaquepts, Histosols (except Folists), Argiaquolls, or Umbraquults? (-Yes (" No c) Do the soils at the described point have a NRCS hydric soil field indicator (see #17), and is the point located within a map unit named or designated by the NRCS as frequently flooded, depressional, or water? Map Unit: C' Yes ('),No (- ) Inconclusive <-- Why? (skip to #27a) d} Are the C Test criteria met per §62-340.300(2)(c), F.A.C. at the described point? 0 Yes f),No (Note: if no to 26a and yes to either 26b or 26c, C Test criteria are met) e) Are there any alterations or conditions affecting reliable application of the C Test such that the Altered Sites Test is more appropriate? (',Yes (s-) No 27. D Test Wetland Criteria §62-340.300(2)(d), F.A.C. As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations: a) Is the soil hydric as verified by a NRCS hydric soil field indicator? (See #17) (f; Yes C� No (skip to #27d) 0 Inconclusive (--Why? (skip to #28) b) Does any NRCS hydric soil field indicator begin at the soil surface or are any of the following indicators present: Al, A2, A3, A4, A5, A7, A8, A9, S4, F2? (•-. Yes C No (If yes, then hydrologic indicator§62-340.500(8) or (11) is met) c) Is one or more of the hydrologic indicators in §62-340.500, F.A.C. present at the described point? (See #23) (• Yes (.mNo d) Are the D Test criteria met per §62-340.300(2)(d), F.A.C. at the described point? r, Yes QNo (Note: If yes to 27a and yes to either 27b or 27c, D Test criteria may be met) e) Are there any alterations or conditions affecting reliable application of the D Test such that the Altered Sites Test is more appropriate? (-j Yes (f= No 28. Altered Sites Tests §62-340.300(3), F.A.C. (Legal/Authorized or Illegal/Unauthorized) For purposes of Chapter 62-340, F.A. C. altered refers to any natural or man -induced conditions) which masks or eliminates reliable expression of wetland indicators (i.e. hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and hydrologic indicators), Unaltered or normal does not require a natural condition, only an expression of wetland indicators that is sufficient to reliably identify or delineate the wetland using the criteria in §62-340.300, F.A. C. Are alterations affecting normal wetland condition? CD Yes t :,No (skip to #32) 0Evaluation Impossible (skip to #32) 29. Authorized or Legally Altered Vegetation and Soils Test Criteria §62-340.300(3)(a), F.A.C. a) Are there authorized or legal alterations affecting reliable expression of vegetation at the described point? ) Yes C, No If yes, how? b) Are there authorized or legal alterations affecting reliable soil evaluation at the described point? (--)Yes (-) No If yes, how? (If no to both 29a and 29b, skip to #30) c) If yes to 29a or 29b, which criteria tests are affected by the legal alterations? ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test d) Using the most reliable available information and reasonable scientific judgment, would the types of evidence and characteristics contemplated in §62-340.300, F.A.C. identify or delineate the described point as a wetland with cessation of the legal altering activities? ('Yes (',No If no, why? (If no, skip to #30) e) If yes to 29d, what §62-340,300, F.A.C. evidence is present now and/or will be present in the future with cessation of legal altering activities? ❑ Plants ❑ Soils ❑ Hydrologic indicators f) if yes to 29d, which tests would be passed with cessation of legal altering activities? ❑ Wetland Definition ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test Why? Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effective Page 220 of 403 Point ID/Location: 30. Authorized or Legally Altered Hydrology Test Criteria §62-340.300(3)(b), F.A.C. a) Has wetland hydrology of the area been legally drained or lowered? CYes C) No (If no, skip to #31) If yes, how? b) Has wetland hydrology been legally eliminated at the described point? C Yes (') No (If no, skip to #31) c) if yes to 30b, using reasonable scientific judgment or §62-340.550, F.A.C., have dredging or filling activities authorized by Part IV of Chapter 373. F.S. permanently eliminated wetland hydrology at the described point such that the wetland definition cannot be met? CYes (point is upland) C No (If yes, skip to #31) Chapter 373, F.S. Part 11 activities (e.g., water use permits) or other temporary hydrologic alterations (e.g., surface water pumps, drought) do not apply to this or any other Ch, 62-340, F.A.C. determinations. d) If no to 30c, what §62-340.300, F.A.C. evidence is present now and/or will be present in the future with cessation of temporary hydrologic drainage? © Plants ❑ Soils ❑ Hydrologic indicators e) If no to 30c, Which tests would be passed with cessation of temporary hydrologic alterations? Wetland Definition ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test Why? 31. Unauthorized or illegally Altered Sites Test Criteria §62-340.300(3)(c), F.A.C. if the altering activity is a violation of regulatory requirements, then application of §62-340.300(3)(c), F.A. C. and all provisions of Chapter 62-340, F.A. C. are utilized to identify or delineate the wetland in a forensic manner. This identification or delineation reflects the condition immediately prior to the unauthorized alteration. a) Have any unauthorized alterations affected the normal wetland condition at the described point? (-.,Yes CNo If yes, how? (if no, skip to #32) b) If yes to 31 a, which criteria tests are affected by the unauthorized alterations? ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test c) With reasonable scientific judgment is the described point a wetland, or would it have been a wetland immediately prior to the unauthorized alteration? C Yes Cl No If no, why? (If no, skip to #32) d) if yes to 31 c, what §62-340.300, F.A.C. evidence is present now and/or was present immediately prior to the unauthorized alteration? ❑ Plants ❑ Soils ❑ Hydrologic indicators e) If yes to 31 c, which tests would be passed immediately prior to the unauthorized alteration? ❑ Wetland Definition ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test Why? 32. Wetland and Other Surface Water Summary §62-340.600(2)(a-e), F.A.G.: Given normal expression, cessation of authorized alterations, or immediately prior to any unauthorized alterations: a) With reasonable scientific judgment is the described point a wetland as defined in §62-340.200(19), F.A.C. and located by Ch. 62-340, F.A.C.? ( =Yes (7) No If yes, which criteria identified or delineated the wetland? ® Wetland Definition ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ® D Test If summary answers differ from answers in 25f, 25g, 26d, or 27d, why? b) Is the described point located at or within the Mean High Water Line of a tidal water body? (Yes (-I No (,-,,MHWL Unknown c) Is the described point located at or within the Ordinary High Water Line of a non -tidal natural water body or natural watercourse? (7.Yes C)No d) Is the described point located at or within the top of the bank of an artificial lake, borrow pit, canal, ditch, or other type of artificial water body or watercourse with side slopes of 1 foot vertical to 4 feet horizontal or ste_ eper, excluding spoil banks when the canals and ditches have resulted from excavation into the ground? C)Yes (j? No e) Is the described point located at or within the Seasonal High Water Line of an artificial lake, borrow pit, canal, ditch, or other type of artificial water body or watercourse with side slopes fla ter than 1 foot vertical to 4 feet horizontal or an artificial water body created by diking or impoundment above the ground? 0Yes (*-) No 33. Connection or Isolation of Wetland per Applicant's Handbook Vol.1 Section 2.0 If the described point is a wetland, does it have a connection via wetlands or other surface waters, or is it wholly surrounded by uplands and therefore isolated? C Connected 0Isolated N/A (Point is not wetland) Form 62-330.201(1)-Chapter62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effective date) Page 5 of Page 221 of 403 nt ID/Location: 34. Photographs and/or videos: Soil profile with Data Form, Soil profile close-up, Cross section(s) at 6" depth for sandy textures and/or critical depths for fine textures, Hydric soil indicators, Water table or inundation depth, Four cardinal directions of plant strata present, Hydrologic indicators (with scale as necessary), Critical plant ID (optional) Memory Card # / Metadata 5. 7 Description, compass direction (if Notes: See Site Documentation - WETLAND Taken Helpful Definitions for Applying Cb 62-340, F.A.C. 1RSJ stands for Reasonable Scientific Judgment where used throughout this Data Form (See The Florida Wetlands Delineation Manual pg. 2 & 12) 2HSTS stands for Hydric Soils Technical Standard (See NRCS Hydric Soils Technical Note 11) Definition from §62.340.200(19) Florida Administrative Code "Wetlands," as defined in subsection 373.019(17), F.S., means those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or ground water at a frequency and a duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soils. Soils present in wetlands generally are classified as hydric or alluvial, or possess characteristics that are associated with reducing soil conditions. The prevalent vegetation in wetlands generally consists of facultative or obligate hydrophytic macrophytes that are typically adapted to areas having soil conditions described above. These species, due to morphological, physiological, or reproductive adaptations, have the ability to grow, reproduce or persist in aquatic environments or anaerobic soil conditions. Florida wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bayheads, bogs, cypress domes and strands, sloughs, wet prairies, riverine swamps and marshes, hydric seepage slopes, tidal marshes, mangrove swamps and other similar areas. Florida wetlands generally do not include longleaf or slash pine flatwoods with an understory dominated by saw palmetto, Definition from §373.019(19) Florida Statutes "Surface water" means water upon the surface of the earth, whether contained in bounds created naturally or artificially or diffused. Water from natural springs shall be classified as surface water when it exits from the spring onto the earth's surface. Definition from §373.019(14) Florida Statutes "Other watercourse" means any canal, ditch, or other artificial watercourse in which water usually flows in a defined bed or channel. It is not essential that the flowing be uniform or uninterrupted. Definition from §62.340.200(15) Florida Administrative Code "Seasonal High Water" means the elevation to which the ground and surface water can be expected to rise due to a normal wet season. From The Florida Wetlands D,:Iinr ation Manual pg. 37 Ordinary high water is that point on the slope or bank where the surface water from the water body ceases to exert a dominant influence on the character of the surrounding vegetation and soils. The OHWL frequently encompasses areas dominated by non -listed vegetation and non-hydric soils. When the OHWL is not at a wetland edge, the general view of the area may present an "upland" appearance. Definition from §403.803(14) Florida Statutes "Swale" means a manmade trench which: (a) Has a top width -to -depth ratio of the cross-section equal to or greater than 6:1, or side slopes equal to or greater than 3 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical; (b) Contains contiguous areas of standing or flowing water only following a rainfall event; (c) Is planted with or has stablized vegetation suitable for soil stabilization, stormwater treatment, and nutrient uptake; and (d) Is designed to take into acount the soil erodibility, soil percolation, slope, slope length, and drainage area so as to prevent erosion and reduce pollutant concentration of any discharge. Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effective date) Page 6 of 6 Page 222 of 403 1111111111111111111111111111111111 Jill 111115I Jill 111111111111 J i l l 111111 a 1111111111111111 I I 11111111I C denotes the Rule, subsection,CM 1II$11111�2131415 paragraph, or subparagraph FDEP SLERC August 2019 Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form referenced from Ch. 62-340, F.A.C. 1. Date: SEE RPRT 2. Staff Present: SEE RPRT 3. Form recorder(s): SEE RPT 4. County: SEE RPRT 5. Site Name: SEE RPRT Tracking #: 6. Point ID: SEE RPRT GPS Coordinates: F 7. Distances and bearings from fixed objects (if no GPS): N/A 8. Current condition of described point: C` Authorized or legal condition r Unauthorized or illegal condition 9. Work type: C, Identification C•= Delineation Point status: (:, Wetland C} Non -Wetland Surface Water CS Upland 10. Vegetative Stratum §62-340.400: Using §62-340.400, F.A.C. with reasonable scientific judgment, select the appropriate vegetative stratum. (Do not include FAC species when determining 10% minimum areal extent.) C� Canopy (Min. 10%areal extent) C:Subcanopy (Min. 10% areal extent) CGroundcover (No min. areal extent) (Vegetation Absent (skip to #14) (� Evaluation Impossible (skip to #14) Why? 11. Plant List §62-340.200(2),(6),(16), §62-340.400, §62-340.450, F.A.C.: Areal extent As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ' or the legality of any alterations: estimator: Select and identify plants in an area just large enough to represent and classify the plant community at the described point. Do not extend into different communities or hydrologic conditions. 3. For each species present in the 1 Record the scientific name (binomial) 2. Record the percent areal stratum selected in #10, transfer and status of each plant species extent in the canopy, the numbers from only that necessary to identify/delineate and classify subcanopy, and groundcover stratum's column into the the plant community in the selected area. columns for each species. appropriate status columns. # I Binomial of Observed Species Status Canopy Subcanopy Groundcover Upland Facultative Fac. Wet Obligate 5 1. ITaxodium sp. CYPRESS O 5 2. JPinus elliottii U 10 10 3. Chrysobalanus iaco FW 15 4. Acacia auriculiformes F 20 5 5 20 5. Melaleuca q. F 45 5 45 6. Telmatoblechnum serrulatum FW 15 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Percent areal extent totals for the stratum selected in question 10 10 65 0 5 12. 13. In the stratum selected in #10: What is the % areal extent of Obligate plants? 5 What is the % areal extent of Upland plants? 10 Is the areal extent of Obligate plants greater than that of Upland plants? )Yes C:>No In the stratum selected in #10: What is the total % areal extent of Obligate & Facultative Wet plants combined? 5 What is the total % areal extent of Obligate, Facultative Wet, & Upland plants combined? 15 What is the percentage of OBL + FACW in relation to all plants, excluding FAC? (o OBL+FA uPL) 33.3% BL+FAC corm bz-33u.zu1(i) - unapter U-34U, r.A.u. uata corm Incorpafatea Dy rererence In suosecton bz-33U.zU1(1 �, F-.A.G. (errective ante) rage 1 of b Page 223 of 403 Point ID/Location: SEE RPT Soil describer: SEE RPT 14. LRR/MLRA U Textures: Peat, Mucky Peat, Muck, Mucky Mineral (S or F), Sand, Fine, Marl 16. Is a soil profile evaluation possible? C.`-Yes CNo If no, why? (if No, skip to #18) 16. Soil Description: As is under current conditions, without considering RSJI or the legality of any alterations Soil surface, or 0 inch depth for purposes of Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. is the muck or mineral surface (whether natural or fill) for sandy than matrix), ' Describe soil features: DA (areas darker than matrix), LA (areas lighter to beginning moist matrix RC (redox concentrations): Record in moist condition hue value/chroma; volume in /o to ending Matrix condition horizons horizon; boundaries (sharp/clear/diffuse); shape (rounded/linear/angular). Horizon Depth Texture Matrix value <_ 3: : _ OB (organic bodies): Record texture (muck or mucky mineral), % volume in horizon. Indicate depth detected (inches) Hue Value/ "�o Organic _ H2S (hydro en sulfide odor): shallowest where Chroma Coating _ Rote if horizon is Physically Mixed (PM), Nonsoil (any material not listed in "Textures" above), or Fill and describe. ORGANIC BODIES 1 0-3 MM 12 9R LA 10YR 8/1 25% ROUND DIFFUSE 2 3-13 S 10 YR i 3 4 6 6 17. Hydric Soil Field Indicators: If present, check all Hydric Soil Field Indicators satisfied and specify their beginning 0 All Texture © Sandy Texture 0 Fine Texture and ending depths (Al) Histosol* _(S4) Sandy Gleyed Matrix* _(F2) Loamy Gleyed Matrix* Indicator Begin End Present Depth Depth (A2) Histic Epipedon* _(S5) Sandy Redox _(F3) Depleted Matrix 1. A6 0 3 (A3) Black Histic* ✓ (S6) Stripped Matrix _(F6) Redox Dark Surface 3 13 2 S6 (A4) Hydrogen Sulfide* _(S7) Dark Surface _(F7) Depleted Dark Surface (A5) Stratified Layers* _(S8) Polyvalue Below Surface _(F8) Redox Depression 3.- (A6) Organic Bodies _(S9) Thin Dark Surface _(F10) Marl 4• (A7) 5cm Mucky Mineral* _(S12) Barrier Islands lcm Muck _(F12) Iron -Manganese Masses 5• (A8) Muck Presence* _(F13) Umbric Surface 6. (A9) 1cm Muck* _(F22) Very Shallow Dark Surface (All) Depleted Below Dark Surface * = Stand-alone D Test- both hydric soil I To combine layers/indicators to meet thickness (Al2) Thick Dark Surface and hydrologic indicator requirements, see NRCS Hydric Soils Technical Note 4. 18. Excluding organic horizons, is any nonsoil horizon present at or within the uppermost 12 inches of the ground surface? C Yes (e.g. bedrock, rock outcrop, limestone fill, gravel, etc) {j No -)Soil profile or site inaccessible 19. Is one or more hydric soil field indicators present? (:,Yes 0No r Inconclusive (e.g., evaluation to 12+inches If no or inconclusive, is the soil hydric as determined b other NRCS methods? impeded by disturbance, water, y y nonsoil, no site access, etc.) (-)Yes Which methods}? (7) No C� Inconclusive F Why? (e.g., hydric soil definition, NSTS2, indicator present at drier elevation, indicator would be present but for disturbance) 20. Is the depth of the soil profile 20 inches or greater from the soil surface? Q Yes CFa No If no, depth of soil profile is: 13 inches Why? (e.g., root refusal, nonsoil, water table, loose sand, heavy texture, compaction, weather conditions, inspection interrupted) 21. Observed height or depth of standing water from soil surface: inches (,,Above Q Below C1Not Observed (1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effective date) Page 2 of 6 Page 224 of 403 Point ID/Location: Indicator evaluator: 22. Hydrologic Indicators: As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations Predicted Within 1. Describe the type of all checked indicators. HydrologicInds Hydrologic Indicators Present' re a during 100 ft 2. Approximate the distance and compass direction of per §62-34F.A.C. normal high waterward of point indicators within 100 ft of the point. 3. For water level indicators (potential indicators denoted (and as applied to §62-340.60q F.A.C.) port water or (not for by *) note the height from ground surface at the point wet upland as well as waterward (with distance from point). season* points) *Only for indicators not present due to dry season/drought (1) Algal mats* (2) Aquatic mosses or liverworts* (3) Aquatic plants* (4) Aufwuchs (5) Drift lines and rafted debris* (6) Elevated lichen lines* (7) Evidence of aquatic fauna (8) Hydrologic data* (9) Morphological plant adaptations* (10) Secondary flow channels (11) Sediment deposition* (12) Tussocks or hummocks* (13) Water marks* (jAbove Ground Surface (7)No Water Level Indicators 4 Highest water level indicator height at point: inches C:;Above Soil Surface ()N/A (described point is Upland) 23. Is one or more hydrologic indicator(s) listed in §62-340.500, F.A.C. present or predicted with normal high water or )Evaluation Impossible c- Why? wet season conditions at the described point? (Yes Q No (- 24. Delineation by Wetland Definition §62-340.300(l), F.A.C. As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ' or the legality of any alterations: a) Has a wetland boundary been delineated at the described point? C Yes C) No (if No, skip to #25) b) If yes to 24a, can the boundary be easily delineated using the definition of wetlands? C, Yes C No 26. A & B Test Wetland Criteria §62-340.300(2)(a),(b), F.A.C. As is under current conditions, without considering RSJI or the legality of any alterations: a) Is the areal extent of Obligate plants in the stratum selected in #10 greater than the areal extent of all Upland plants in that stratum? (See #12) C, Yes (:1 No C, Vegetation Absent (skip to #250 (--1 Evaluation Impossible (skip to #26a) b) Is the areal extent of Obligate and/or Facultative Wet plants in the stratum selected in #10 equal to or greater than 80% of all the plants in that stratum, excluding Facultative plants? (See #13) C, Yes (F) No c) Is the soil hydric as identified using standard NRCS definitions and practices? (see #19) (7Yes C' No (' Indeterminable with current conditions F Why? d) Is the substrate composed of riverwash, nonsoil (see #18), rock outcrop -soil complex, or is the substrate located within an artificially created wetland area? (' Yes (-) No If yes, which condition is present? e) Is one or more of the hydrologic indicators in §62-340.500, F.A.C. present at the described point? (See #23) (_'�Yes (7) No f) Are the A Test criteria met per §62-340.300(2)(a), F.A.C. at the described point? (-,Yes No (Note: If yes to 25a and yes to either 25c, 25d, or 25e, A Test criteria are met) g) Are the B Test criteria met per §62-340.300(2)(b), F.A.C. at the described point? Yes (0-, No (Note: If yes to 25b and yes to either 25c, 25d, or 25e, B Test criteria are met) h) Are there any alterations or conditions affecting reliable application of the A or B Test such that the Altered Sites Test is more appropriate? c)Yes f No Farm 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effective date) Page 3 of 6 Page 225 of 403 Point ID/Location: 26. C Test Wetland Criteria §62-340.300(2)(c), F.A.C. As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations: a) Per §62-340.300(2)(c), F.A.C. is the described point Pine Flatwoods or Improved Pasture, or does it have drained soils? (--,Yes r No if yes, select which of the following are met, then skip to #26d Pine Flatwoods ❑ Improved Pasture ❑ Drained Soils Pine Flatwoods must have flat terrain, a monotypic or mixed canopy of long leaf pine or slash pine, and a ground cover dominated by saw palmetto with other species that are NOT obligate or facultative wet. Improved Pasture means areas where the dominant native plant community has been replaced with planted or natural recruitment of herbaceous species which are NOT obligate or facultative wet species and which have been actively maintained for livestock through mechanical means or grazing. Drained Soils are those in which permanent alterations, excluding mechanical pumping. preclude the formation of hydric soils. b) Are the soils at the described point saline sands (salt flats -tidal flats), or have they been field verified by NRCS's Keys to Soil Taxonomy (4th ed. 1990) as Umbraqualfs, Sulfaquents, Hydraquents, Humaquepts, Histosols (except Folists), Argiaquolls, or Umbraquults? CYes C No c) Do the soils at the described point have a NRCS hydric soil field indicator (see #17), and is the point located within a map unit named or designated by the NRCS as frequently flooded, depressional, or water? Map Unit: C Yes Q No C Inconclusive <- Why? (skip to #27a) d) Are the C Test criteria met per §62-340.300(2)(c), F.A.C. at the described point? C Yes (7,No (Note: if no to 26a and yes to either 26b or 26c, C Test criteria are met) e) Are there any alterations or conditions affecting reliable application of the C Test such that the Altered Sites Test is more appropriate? C Yes (e_- � No 27. D Test Wetland Criteria §62-340.300(2)(d), F.A.C. As is under current conditions, without considering RSJ1 or the legality of any alterations: a) Is the soil hydric as verified by a MRCS hydric soil field indicator? (See #17) ( � Yes (7, � No (skip to #27d) C, Inconclusive F Why? (skip to #28) b) Does any NRCS hydric soil field indicator begin at the soil surface or are any of the following indicators present: A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A7, A8, A9, S4, F2? �, Yes Cj No (If yes, then hydrologic indicator§62-340.500(8) or (11) is met) c) Is one or more of the hydrologic indicators in §62-340.500, F.A.C, present at the described point? (See #23) (07,Yes CNo d) Are the D Test criteria met per §62-340.300(2)(d), F.A.C. at the described point? (:? Yes CNo (Note: If yes to 27a and yes to either 27b or 27c, D Test criteria may be met) e) Are there any alterations or conditions affecting reliable application of the D Test such that the Altered Sites Test is more appropriate? t)Yes r: No 28. Altered Sites Tests §62-340.300(3), F.A.C. (Legal/Authorized or Illegal/Unauthorized) For purposes of Chapter 62-340, F.A. C. altered refers to any natural or man -induced condition(s) which masks or eliminates reliable expression of wetland indicators (i.e. hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and hydrologic indicators), Unaltered or normal does not require a natural condition, only an expression of wetland indicators that is sufficient to reliably identify or delineate the wetland using the criteria in §62-340.300, F.A. C. Are alterations affecting normal wetland condition? C, Yes (:kNo (skip to #32) C Evaluation Impossible_ (skip to #32) 29. Authorized or Legally Altered Vegetation and Soils Test Criteria §62-340.300(3)(a), F.A.C. a) Are there authorized or legal alterations affecting reliable expression of vegetation at the described point? C Yes C No If yes, how? b) Are there authorized or legal alterations affecting reliable soil evaluation at the described point? CYes (-)NO If yes, how? (if no to both 29a and 29b, skip to #30) c) If yes to 29a or 29b, which criteria tests are affected by the legal alterations? A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test d) Using the most reliable available information and reasonable scientific judgment, would the types of evidence and characteristics contemplated in §62-340.300, F.A.G. identify or delineate the described point as a wetland with cessation of the legal altering activities? (7Yes (',No If no, why? (If no, skip to #30) e) If yes to 29d, what §62-340.300, F.A.C. evidence is present now and/or will be present in the future with cessation of legal altering activities? ❑ Plants ❑ Soils ❑ Hydrologic indicators f) If yes to 29d, which tests would be passed with cessation of legal altering activities? Wetland Definition ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test Why? Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effective date) Page 4 of 6 Page 226 of 403 Point ID/Location: 30. Authorized or Legally Altered Hydrology Test Criteria §62-340.300(3)(b), F.A.C. a) Has wetland hydrology of the area been legally drained or lowered? (-jYes Q No (If no, skip to #31) If yes, how? b) Has wetland hydrology been legally eliminated at the described point? C Yes No (If no, skip to #31) c) If yes to 30b, using reasonable scientific judgment or §62-340.550, F.A.C., have dredging or filling activities authorized by Part IV of Chapter 373, F.S. permanently eliminated wetland hydrology at the described point such that the wetland definition cannot be met? ()Yes (point is upland) (, No (if yes, skip to #31) Chapter 373, F.S. Part it activities (e.g., water use permits) or other temporary hydrologic alterations (e.g., surface waterpumps, drought) do not apply to this or any other Ch. 62-340, F.A.C. determinations. d) If no to 30c, what §62-340.300, F.A.C. evidence is present now and/or will be present in the future with cessation of temporary hydrologic drainage? ❑ Plants ❑ Soils ❑ Hydrologic indicators e) If no to 30c, Which tests would be passed with cessation of temporary hydrologic alterations? ❑ Wetland Definition ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test Why? 31. Unauthorized or Illegally Altered Sites Test Criteria §62-340.300(3)(c), F.A.C. If the altering activity is a violation of regulatory requirements, then application of §62-340.300(3)(c), F.A. C. and all provisions of Chapter 62-340, F.A. C. are utilized to identify or delineate the wetland in a forensic manner. This identification or delineation reflects the condition immediately prior to the unauthorized alteration. a) Have any unauthorized alterations affected the normal wetland condition at the described point? OYes (�No If yes, how? (If no, skip to #32) b) If yes to 31 a, which criteria tests are affected by the unauthorized alterations? A Test ❑ B Test R C Test ❑ D Test c) With reasonable scientific judgment is the described point a wetland, or would it have been a wetland immediately prior to the unauthorized alteration? (` Yes O No if no, why? (If no, skip to #32) d) If yes to 31 c, what §62-340.300, F.A.C. evidence is present now and/or was present immediately prior to the unauthorized alteration? ❑ Plants ❑ Soils ❑ Hydrologic indicators e) if yes to 31 c, which tests would be passed immediately prior to the unauthorized alteration? Wetland Definition ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ❑ D Test Why? 32. Wetland and Other Surface Water Summary §62-340.600(2)(a-e), F.A.C.: Given normal expression, cessation of authorized alterations, or immediately prior to any unauthorized alterations: a) With reasonable scientific judgment is the described point a wetland as defined in §62-340.200(19), F.A.C. and located by Ch. 62-340, F.A.C.? tF� Yes Cj No If yes, which criteria identified or delineated the wetland? ® Wetland Definition ❑ A Test ❑ B Test ❑ C Test ® D Test If summary answers differ from answers in 25f, 25g, 26d, or 27d, why? b) Is the described point located at or within the Mean High Water Line of a tidal water body? (' Yes C. No (', MHWL Unknown c) Is the described point located at or within the Ordinary High Water Line of a non -tidal natural water body or natural watercourse? (' Yes C, No d) is the described point located at or within the top of the bank of an artificial lake, borrow pit, canal, ditch, or other type of artificial water body or watercourse with side slopes of 1 foot vertical to 4 feet horizontal orsteeper, excluding spoil banks when the canals and ditches have resulted from excavation into the ground? (-.Yes (:,) No e) Is the described point located at or within the Seasonal High Water Line of an artificial lake, borrow pit, canal, ditch, or other type of artificial water body or watercourse with side slopes flatter than 1 foot vertical to 4 feet horizontal or an artificial water body created by diking or impoundment above the ground? (';Yes C�No 33. Connection or Isolation of Wetland per Applicant's Handbook Vol.1 Section 2.0 If the described point is a wetland, does it have a connection via wetlands or other surface waters, or is it wholly surrounded by uplands and therefore isolated? () Connected Isolated (' N/A (Point is not wetland) Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effective date) Page 5 of 6 Page 227 of 403 Point ID/Location: 34. Photographs and/or videos: Soil profile with Data Form, Soil profile close-up, Cross section(s) at 6" depth for sandy textures and/or critical depths for fine textures, Hydric soil indicators, Water table or inundation depth, Four cardinal directions of plant strata present, Hydrologic indicators (with scale as necessary), Critical plant ID (optional) # Memory Card # / Metadata Description, compass direction (if applicable) Taken By 1. 2. - 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11, - - 12j - - 13. 14. Notes: See Site Documentation - WETLAND Helpful Definitions for Applying Ch 62-340, F.A.C. IRSJ stands for Reasonable Scientific Judgment where used throughout this Data Form (See The Florida Wetlands Delineation Manual pg. 2 & 12) zHSTS stands for Hydric Soils Technical Standard (See NRCS Hydric Soils Technical Note 11) Definition from §62.340.200(19) Florida Administrative Code "Wetlands," as defined in subsection 373.019(17), F.S., means those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or ground water at a frequency and a duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soils. Soils present in wetlands generally are classified as hydric or alluvial, or possess characteristics that are associated with reducing soil conditions. The prevalent vegetation in wetlands generally consists of facultative or obligate hydrophytic macrophytes that are typically adapted to areas having soil conditions described above. These species, due to morphological, physiological, or reproductive adaptations, have the ability to grow, reproduce or persist in aquatic environments or anaerobic soil conditions. Florida wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bayheads, bogs, ,cypress domes and strands, sloughs, wet prairies, riverine swamps and marshes, hydric seepage slopes, tidal marshes, mangrove swamps and other similar areas. Florida wetlands generally do not include longleaf or slash pine flatwoods with an understory dominated by saw palmetto. Definition from §373.419(19) Florida Statutes "Surface water" means water upon the surface of the earth, whether contained in bounds created naturally or artificially or diffused. Water from natural springs shall be classified as surface water when it exits from the spring onto the earth's surface. Definition from §373.019(14) Florida Statutes "Other watercourse" means any canal, ditch, or other artificial watercourse in which water usually flows in a defined bed or channel. It is not essential that the flowing be uniform or uninterrupted. Definition from §62.340.200(15) Florida Administrative Code "Seasonal High Water" means the elevation to which the ground and surface water can be expected to rise due to a normal wet season. From The Florida Wetlands Delineation Manuai pg. 37 Ordinary high water is that point on the slope or bank where the surface water from the water body ceases to exert a dominant influence on the character of the surrounding vegetation and soils. The OHWL frequently encompasses areas dominated by non -listed vegetation and non-hydric soils. When the OHWL is not at a wetland edge, the general view of the area may present an "upland" appearance. Definition from §403.603(14) Florida Statutes "Swale" means a manmade trench which: (a) Has a top width -to -depth ratio of the cross-section equal to or greater than 6:1, or side slopes equal to or greater than 3 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical; (b) Contains contiguous areas of standing or flowing water only following a rainfall event; (c) Is planted with or has stablized vegetation suitable for soil stabilization, stormwater treatment, and nutrient uptake; and (d) Is designed to take into acount the soil erodibility, soil percolation, slope, slope length, and drainage area so as to prevent erosion and reduce pollutant concentration of any discharge. Form 62-330.201(1) - Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. Data Form Incorporated by reference in subsection 62-330.201(1), F.A.C. (effective date) Page 6 of 6 Page 228 of 403 Tropical Environmental Consultants www.TropicalEnvironmentalConsultants.com 3900 Mannix Dr. #118 Naples, Florida. 34114 239-455-6232 n`T "Striving for balance between human use and the environment" since 1983 Question Detail Q1: The Florida Department of Environmental Protection will require E.R.P's (Environmental Resource Permits) for most projects proposing to alter the topography of the land via digging, filling, building, or machine clearing. Non -regulated or exempt activities include, but are not limited to; residential construction when confined to upland habitat, alteration of man- made isolated wetlands, and agricultural impacts. Unless noted otherwise, TEC determined the project's need for an ERP permit based upon a conceptual site configuration designed to minimize environmental loss as much as practicable. ***Prior to planning or land alteration efforts, TEC recommends the applicant obtain agency verification of the findings and conclusions including, but not limited to; the location and extent of uplands and wetlands on site as presented by TEC*** Neglecting to secure agency verification may subject the applicant to otherwise avoidable compliance/enforcement/ actions in cases where an agency concludes wetlands or surface waters were in fact adversely impacted after the fact. In addition, city or county regulations typically require prior notification or permits for vegetation removal actions in both upland and wetland areas.*** Please contact TEC with questions or for further assistance with the verification or permit process. Q2: Isolated wetlands do not flow into other wetlands or surface waters that are themselves connected to waters of the State. A wetland may connect via a man-made ditch or stream and eventually flow into the Gulf of Mexico or the Atlantic Ocean. Impacts to "Isolated" wetlands are generally considered minor, and wetland mitigation is often not required. 03: State and Federal agencies typically require wetland mitigation when a project proposes to eliminate or diminish the function of wetlands on site, and when impacts exceed 0.10 acres. Special exceptions allowing the applicant to avoid mitigation vary between the State and Federal agencies, and include, but are not limited to; property creation date, prior permit history, verification of "isolated" or "contiguous", minimization of impact, and several other site -specific criteria. For many projects, wetland mitigation is a specific condition of the permit, and must be completed prior to construction activities. The final determination shall be made by the applicable regulatory agencies. Q4: Mitigation -related costs increase for impacts to higher quality wetlands, and for impacts which exceed generally accepted standard square footage thresholds for the use proposed. Therefore, construction of a typical -size residence positioned within low -quality wetland habitat will be less costly to mitigate than for the same residence constructed within high -quality wetlands. Likewise, a larger home will require more mitigation than a smaller home built within the same functioning wetland. The amount of mitigation required is directly related to the'Quality' of wetlands being impacted. The quality of wetland(s) on this site is described on page one (1). Q5: South Florida experiences a dry and wet season, typical to tropical and sub -tropical environments. Florida's rainy season occurs May/June and runs through September/October, with surface water levels dropping several feet after October. Excessive water levels within the building footprint will likely increase the need for fill material to elevate the building/septic ground and could increase overall project costs. Additionally, standing water may contribute to reduced recreational, building, gardening, or livestock use. A local builder knowledgeable of building and engineering -related elevation requirements may assist you in understanding what additional costs may be incurred as a result of low-lying or submerged lands. These levels will occur during the latter part of the summer rainy season. Standing water is anticipated to remain at or near ground level for approximately weeks. South Florida's rainy season occurs from June/July-October. Q6: Limestone located near the surface of the lot may require special design/construction considerations including the placement of an on -site sewage treatment system in areas of elevated limestone. A general building contractor or septic Engineer may assist you in understanding these considerations. Q7: Contact TEC or your local property tax collector for more information regarding the valuation of wet land for property tax purposes. REPORT VERSION 412021 PID: 00404240000, 00404280002, 00426680004 Page 229 of 403 Tropical Environmental Consultants www.Tropica[EnvironmentalConsultants.com 3900 Mannix Dr. #118 Naples, Florida. 34114 239-455-6232 TM "Striving for balance between human use and the environment" since 1983 Q8: Exotic -nuisance vegetation is difficult to control in the landscape and when found in dense quantities on vacant land, can spread rapidly, and tends to decrease the value of that land to wildlife and other native plant species. For these reasons, local county regulations often require a property owner to remove non-native nuisance species prior to issuing a Certificate of Occupancy, adding additional development costs to a project. Removal of any vegetation (including exotic species) by mechanical means may require a vegetation removal permit from your local County/City builiding department. 09: Federal and State agencies provide special protections for endangered or threatened species. Additional environmental surveys and procurement of permits or verification of no negative affect may be required when altering habitat, even if listed species were not identified during completion of the informal wetland determination. It is up to the applicant via the services of an environmental consultant to ensure development actions do not adversely affect listed species. Federal agencies will conduct a review for listed species prior to the issuance of permits including permits for jurisdictional wetland impacts. Often the applicant will be responsible for providing to these agencies a species survey report during the review process. ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? NEED ASSISTANCE? CONTACT TEC FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Thank you for allowing TEC to assist you with your environmental project needs! "Finding balance between human use and the environment" since 1983 Jurisdictional Wetland Evaluations*Environmental Resource Permitting*Listed Species Surveys*Water Use Permitting*Restorations*Consultations Collier*Lee*Hendry*Charlotte*DeSoto www.TropicalEnvironmentalConsultants.com REPORT VERSION 4/2021 PID: 00404240000, 00404280002, 00426680004 Page 230 of 403 PL20230006785 - ONE LIFE CHURCH BOUNDARY SURVEY HEX Package Page 231 of 403 PAGE 1 OF I TYPE OF SURVEY: PURPOSE OF SURVEY )SEE GENERAL NOTES BELOW): N ❑ BOUNDARY ■ CONSTRUCTION ❑ CONDOMINIUM FUTURE CONSTRUCTION -PURCHASE ❑ ALTAINSPS ❑ TOPOGRAPHIC ❑ SPECIAL PURPOSE BEARING REFERENCE: W IO E s� s� SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST CALCULATED AS ON N 88°57'18N W FROM STATE PLANE COORDINATES N.A.D. 83 AS RECORDED ON LABINS.ORG. S SCALER"=zoo' ALL BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON REFERENCED THERETO. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH (MAYNOT SHOW LATEST IMPROVEMENTS) (NOT -TO -SCALE) REMAINDEROF 5ECTION 8 TOWN511IP 50 5 RANGE 26 E (NOT INCLUDED) CREWS ROAD LINE TABLE LF55 7HE NORTH 30' IBEARING DISTANCE 78Z`" FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY L2 (CM) 4.d ASPHALT ROADWAY It_7.92' 8_ 7.88' LI N89°Od 44"W 333.42' — L2 589'O519'E I 667.84' 5ET 112" IRON _. 333,92' 7,94' 7.69' 333.92' 7,81' 7.83' 5ET 1/2" IRON ROD W/CAP ROD WICAP L5 7274 L5 7274 I o 0 REMAINDER OF _ ORTTIONO PORTION OF PARCEL 2 o RfMAINDEROF 5ECTION 8 SECTION 8 PORTION OF 5ECTION 6 TOWNSHIP 50 5 TOWNSHIP 5ECTION B 5 TOANGE RANGE 26 E _ E RANGE 26 E TOWNSHIP 505 RANGE 26 E 2G NOT INCLUDED) y (INCLUDED) RANGE .,, (NOT INCLUDED) (OCCUPIED) VACANT LOT (INCLUDED) (OCCUPIED) ED) PARCEL ID: '00405480005' 6489750FT. VACANTLOT PARCELID: 14.8 °Opg04480006" 14.B79 N TOTAL) - THE 5E CORNER OF SECTION 8 (BEARING BA5I5)+TCW1 N88°5T 18"W 334.I I'(CN)SHIP 505 sET/2'IRON NBtg° 57' 18"W FOUND/z' SET I/2^IRON NGE26 EROD W/CAP TESOUTH THE PROPERTY ADDRE55: L5 7274 334. (CRaM) IRON ROD ROD UNE OFND NE CORNER 5ECNON 8, T-50 5. 5ECTION I7 2CAP R-26OF XXXX CREWS ROAD 4 X%X%WHITAKER ROAD �� 5 LS 7274 AND NORTH UNE OF TOWNSHIP 50 5 NAPLf5, FL. 34112 ON LINE SECTION 17, T-50 S. R-26 E. RANGE 2G E LEGAL DE5CRIPTION: HFA PARCEL I: o THEWE5T 112 OF THE NOKTHEA5T 1/4 Of THE NOKTHEA5T 1/4 Of THE NOKTHEA5T 1/4 OF 5ECTION o REMAINDER OF 17, TOWN5HIP 50 5OUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, LE55 THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF RE5ERVED FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PARCEL I 5ECTION I7 CD PORTION OF �' TOWNSHIP 50 5 5 PURP05E5, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. A5 RECORDED IN OR 932 PG 1425. AL50 KNOWN A5 - o m TRACT5 7 AND 8, SECTION 17. 5ENON 17 RANGE 25E PARCEL2: w TOWNSHIP 505 0 (NOT INCLUDED) THE WE5T 1120E THE SOUTHEAST 1140E THE 50UR1EAST 1140E THE 50UR1EA5T 1140E RANGE 26E N (OCCUPIED) 5ECTION 8, TOWN5HIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EA5T, 5nUATED IN COWER v (INCLUDED) PARCEL ID: COUNTY, FLORIDA NI"JA TRACT 31, ENCHANTED ACRE5, LE55 THE NORTH 30 VACANT LOT 00404480006" REMAINDER OF ZP FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ROAD RIGHTOf-WAY PURP05E5, PUBLIC 5ECTION 17 RECOKD5 OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOWNSHIP 50T" ' PARCEL 3: THE FA5T 1120E THE 50UTHWf5T 1/4 or THE 50UN1FA5T 1140E RANGE 26E FOUND5/8' (NOT INCLUDED) IRON ROD THE 50UTHEAST 1/4 Or SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 505OUTH, (OCCUPIED) ONVv/RO RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA: RESERVING PARCEL ID: ILLEGIBLE THEREFROM THE NORTH 30 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. '00426800004' SITE BENCHMARK' I" WITNE55 10' N 5ET NAIL t D15C 51TE BENCHMARK 5E1' II2" IRON FLOOD INFORMATION. 0.0615 ELfV = 7.15' 5U NAIL t DI5C ROD W/CAP ZONE:'AH' _— EItV = 7.85' L5 7274 MAP PANEIR: 12021 C0601 H 7.36' ZI3-,F7.04' .I5' 7.35'.w-7.6T 93, EFFECTIVE DATE: 05116'2012 SET I/2^IRON WHITAKER ROAD F4D15C a (cRSMi4 °g �DW/1 4D15CI` 20.0' ASPHALT ROADWAY L5 7274 NO ID LE55 THE 5OUTH 30 NO ID CP FOR RIGHT-0E-WAY 0.28'W REMAINDER OF 0.07' 5 5ECTION 17 CERTIFIED TO TOWNSHIP 50 5 DO INSURANCE AGENCY OF FLORIDA, INC. RANGE 26 E PARKWAY LIFE CHURCH OF GOD (NOT INCLUDED) DO TITLE INSURANCE, INC. "CP"= CONTROLLING POINT POINT OF ROTATION "HFA'=HELD FOR ALIGNMENT - ALL OTHER MONUMENTATION AND IMPROVEMENTS RELATIVE THERETO Platted Easements & Notable Conditions (unplatted easements also listed it provided): IF APPLICABLE, RECIPIENTS OF THIS SURVEY SHOULD REVIEW THE POSITION OF ANYFENCE LINES SHOWN AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO THE BOUNDARY LINE. NO NOTABLE CONDITIONS FOUND. This survey has been issued by the ABBREVL4TIONIEGENDBOMEHEMSIN LEGEND MAY NOT APPEAR ON DRAWING): SYMBOLS (SOW ITEMS IN LEGEND MAY NOTAPPEARONDRAWING-NOTTOSI. LINETYPES: q. UTILITY POLE ® =WELL -HANDICAP PARKING following Landtec Surveying 0(6Ce: 9 Y 9 Co=CL AACL I, -ELEVATON = ECURVE M=MEASURED WM=WATEAMETER CAJ=CLEINOUT PL Fa PT=POINTOFTANGENCY OHC=OVERHEADCFBIE WJ=WAIERVALVE BOUNDARY 700 West Hillsboro Boulevard, Suite 4-100 am CA=CEMRNANGIB PC=P H-CURVE=ELEtTMtA= OTR=OLLwiDi 4=LIGHTPOIE N CENTER LINE BUILDING Deer6eldBeach,FL33441 CAN=GBLE NMSER PCC=POIMOFCONCUND -PHIIBHEDRODRELEV. a=CALCULATEDFROMHMO C E HR=FOLNDECARDD Arvc=RaxcE =CATCH BASIN TL =PARTY WALL V =FIRE HYDRANT ® =AIR EASEMENT ------ CHAIN LINK FENCE —"—•— Office: 561 367-3587 ( I CH=CNORDDISTA H•POOLHEATER FN=FOUNDNAIL _IIECTION CoNC=CONCRETE R—WOF INTFRSECTAN FND=FOUND TR=TELEPHONE RISER cps = SEC. QTR. CORNER CONDmONER RED: (561)465-3145 —CUUTEDFROM PDB=PON-BBCIrxwG C GARA INSHED Tws.TGwBsnIP ®=MANHOLB ® =SEPTIC LID WOODFENCE„— { www.LandfBC$u7vey.com RECRD ROD =POINTOFCOMMENCEMEM BOOR UE=UTEITYEUEM L=I£GLLDEBCRIPIION UP=UTMNPoLE � w =WATER VALVE=SECNON CORNER pWM =WATER METER X =ELEV. SNOT MASTIC DCAB OVERHEADGABLE — I. THIS SURVEY B BASED UPON RECORD INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CUEM. NO SPECIFIC SEARCH OFTHE PUBLIC RECORD HAS BEEN MODE BY THIS OFFICE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. AS INDICATED ABOVE, UNDER TURPOSE OF III IF THIR MI HAB BEEN PREPARED FOR A PURCH0.5E OR REFINANCE, ITS SCOPE IS LIMITED TO THE DETERMINATION OF TITLE DEFICIENCIES, AND 16 NOT INTENDED FOR USE IN DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. UANDTEC SURVEYINGASSUMES NORESPONSIBILIIIES FOR ERRORS RESULTING FROMFNLURETOADHERETOTHIS CLAUSE. 3, ANY FENCES SHOWN HEREON ARE ILLUSTR IVE OF THEIR GENERAL POSITION ONLY. FENCE TIES SHOWN ARE TO GENERAL CENTERLINE OF FENCE. THIS OFFICE WILL HOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES RESUIING FROM THE REMOVAL OF, OR CHANGES MADE TO, ANY FENCES UNLESS WE HAVE PROVIDED A SURVEY SPECIFICALLY LOCATING SAID FENCES FOR SUCH PURPOSES. DETERMINATION OF FENCE POSITIONS SHOULD BE BASED SOLELY ON THEIR PHYSICAL RELATIONSHIP TO THE MONUMENTED BOUNDARY LINES. 4. GRAPHIC REPRESENTATIONS MAY HAVE BEEN EXAGGERATED TO MORE CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE MEASURED RELATIONSHIPS- DIMENSIONS SHALL HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED POSITIONS. 5. UNDERGNOU D IMPROVEMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED MEET AS SPECIFICALLY SHOWN. 6, ELEVANONSAREBASED UPON NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM IN OVIDIM)ORNOmMMERIGNN VERDI (NAV.D. III SHOWN ABOVE, 7. ALL BOUNDARY AND CONTROL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE RED MEASURED AND CORRESPOND TO HECORD INFORMATION UNLESS SPEI RCALLYNOTEDOTHERWISE B. ANY CORNERSSHOWN 9SET"HAVE EITHER BEEN SET ON THE DATE OF FIELDWORK, ORWILL BESET WITHIN 2BUSINESSWEEKSOFSAID DATEAND AREIDEMFIED Job Nr: 169479-SW Date of Field Work: 0411217023 Drawn E.I. WITH A CAP MARKED LS(LICENSED SURVEYOR) f-L Y' Elevations, if shown: PRINTING INSTRUCTIONS: HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY MEETS THE STANDARDS OFPPACTIGE ASOUTLINEOIN CHAPTER S}77.051 H 6P170520F WHEN PRINTING THIS PDF IN ADOBE. SELECT 'ACTUAL SIZE' TO ENSURE CORRECT SCALING. THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472,027, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND THAT ME ELECTRONIC DO NOT USE'FlT'. SIGNATUREAND SEAL HEREON MEETS PROCEDURES ASSET FORTH IN CHAPTER 5J-17062. PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.025, Benchmark: B534 FLORIDA STATUTES. Benchmark Elev.: 9.89, Benchmark k Datum: N � e in:.86 Elevations on Drawing are in:j�•yy LAkND T c N.G.V.D.29 ❑ N.A.V.D.88 ■ U R V E Y I N G RWsions: IS ATURE ` 0513112024 - REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTION -K.T • DATE 31-2024 PABLOALVAAREZ PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER FLORIDAREGISTRATION NO. 7274 (NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OR THE ELECTRONIC SEAL LICENSED BUSINESS No. 8507 OF THE FLOMDA LICENSED SURVEYORAND MAPPER SHOWN ABOVE) Page 232 of 403 RVi PL20230006785 - ONE LIFE CHURCH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS HEX Package Page 233 of 403 RVi PL20230006785 - ONE LIFE CHURCH PROPOSED CONDITIONS HEX Package Page 234 of 403 FORT UCTION GROUP OF NAPLES INC. ONE LIFE CHURCH — CU-PL20230006785 Conditions of Approval REVISED APRIL 2025 1. The One Life Church Conditional Use shall be depicted on the Master Site Plan revised 4/4/2025, prepared by Fort Construction Group of South Florida, Inc. and is limited to a floor area of 25,000 S.F. and a maximum of 400 seats. 2. The conditional use is limited to a 400-seat church with up to 300 members. 3. Hours of operation for church office hours of operation are limited to 8:00 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Sunday. Church and related services are limited to 8:00 a.m. to 1 p.m. Sundays, and 5:00 p.m. to 9 p.m. for nightly meetings. Additional services provided on Christian Holidays (i.e. Good Friday, Christmas Eve Service). 4. The church functions will include two (2) congregations/Sunday services and one (1) youth group. 5. Childcare is limited to supervision of church members' children during Sunday services. Schools and/or day care center uses are expressly prohibited. 6. Development of the site is limited to one (1) principal structure not to exceed 25,000 SF. 7. Crews Road will be constructed and repaired along the development's frontage to the access connection on Santa Barbara pavement to meet Collier County minimum rural cross-section standards. 8. The maximum total daily trip generation for the CU shall not exceed 40 two-way PM peak hour net trips, and 884 two-way Sunday trips, based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. Complete Trip Generation information. 9. For services and other periods and events of significant traffic generation, as determined by Collier County staff, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement -approved service provider as directed by Collier County staff, with staffing and at location(s) as directed by the Collier County Transportation Administrator or his designee. Page 235 of 403 RVi PL20230006785 - ONE LIFE CHURCH MASTER SITE PLAN HEX Package Page 236 of 403 PL20230006785 - ONE LIFE CHURCH ZONING VERIFICATION HEX Package Page 238 of 403 CO 7EY County Growth Management Community Development Department Zoning Services Section March 14, 2023 Brooks Witcher Fort Construction Group of Naples, Inc. 28290 Old 41 Rd Unit 16 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 ZLTR-PL20230002947; Zoning Verification Letter for the property located at E1/2 OF SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 5 AC and W1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 5 AC in Section 8, Township 50, Range 26, and W1/2 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS S 30 FT in Section 17, Township 50, Range 26 of unincorporated Collier County, Florida. Property ID/Folio Number(s): 00404240000, 00404280002, 00426680004 comprising a total of +/- 14.55 acres. Mr. Witcher, This letter is in response to a Zoning Verification Letter (ZLTR) Application that you submitted on or about February 20, 2023. The applicant has asked the questions below in bold print. Staff responses follow each question. Supporting documentation is at the end of the letter. Zoning: The current official zoning atlas, an element of the Collier Land Development Code (LDC), Ordinance 04- 41, as amended, shows that the subject property is located in the Estates (E) Zoning District as well as in the Residential Multi-Family-6 (RMF-6(3)) Zoning District, which has a maximum density of 3 dwelling units per acre. Question: 1. Is combing all three subject parcels allowed? Combining all three subject property parcels is allowed and can be done in two ways. They can either be combined using the Lot Combination form, attached to the letter, from the tax appraiser for tax purposes and will be clean transition during the SDP process, or, they can be combined during the SDP application process by listing the parcels to be included. 2. Is constructing and developing a church permitted on the subject property? The subject property lots are legal conforming according to LDC Sec. 4.02.01. In both the Estates and RMF-6(3) Zoning District, churches are allowed only as a Conditional Use. A Conditional Use application is required for the church and must reference the number in each zoning district. According to LDC Sec. 2.03.0l.B.l.c.1., for the Estates Zoning District, it is Conditional Use #1. Churches. According to LDC Sec. 2.03.02.B.1.c.1., for the RMF-6(3) Zoning District, it is Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • www.colliercountyfl.gov Page 239 of 403 Zoning Verification Letter ZLTR-PL20230002947 Page 2 of 40 Conditional Use #1. The Conditional Use application is attached and must follow the standards and procedures in LDC Sec. 10.08.00, also attached. What are the other allowable uses for the subject property if this were to be developed as a Master Site Development Plan (SDP)? Since there are two different zoning districts included in the subject property, only the uses designated in that district are allowed on the specific parcels. Therefore, for parcel numbers 00404240000, 00404280002, only the permitted uses subject to LDC Sec. 2.03.0LB. 1. are allowed in the Estates Zoning District. For parcel number 00426680004, only the permitted uses subject to LDC Sec. 2.03.02.B.1 are allowed in the RMF-6(3) Zoning District. In the RMF-6(3) Zoning District, the maximum density is three (3) units per acre. Any use developed on these parcels will be subject to the Site Design Standards from LDC Sec. 4.02.01. All LDC sections information is attached to this letter. The information presented in this verification letter is based on the Collier County LDC and/or Growth Management Plan in effect as of this date. It is possible that subsequent amendment(s) to either of these documents could affect the validity of this verification letter. It is also possible that development of the subject property could be affected by other issues not addressed in this letter, such as, but not limited to, concurrency related to the provision of adequate public facilities, environmental impact, and other requirements of the Collier County LDC or related ordinances. This letter represents a determination of Zoning Services Section staff. Should you disagree with this determination, you may request an Official Interpretation by the Zoning Director of the provisions of the Land Development Code pursuant to Sections 1.06.01. and 10.03.06.P of that Code. The fee for an Official Interpretation is identified in the most recent GMD Fee Schedule Resolution as approved by the Board of County Commissioners. To obtain copies of any document referenced herein, please contact the GMD Records Section at (239)252-5730 or GMDPublicRecordRequest(c�r�,CollierCountyFL.gov. The LDC may be viewed online at www.municode.com / Municode Library / Florida / Collier County. Validated Ordinances may be viewed online via the Clerk of Court's website, www.collierclerk.com / Records Search / BMR Records / Boards, Minutes, Records / BMR Validated Ordinances. Disclaimer: Issuance of a development permit by the County does not create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. Should you require additional information, please do not hesitate to call my office at (239) 252-8422. Researched and prepared by: Sean Sammon, Principal Planner Zoning Services Section Reviewed by: Raymond Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Services Section Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • www.colliercountyfl.gov Page 240 of 403 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No 00404240000 Site Address Site City NAPLES *Disclaimer i Name / Address VACAYNAPLES LLC 2540 ROYAL PALM CT City NAPLES State I FL Site Zone 34112 *Note Zip 134103 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 51308 L000100 040 51308 8 50 26 5 Legal 8 50 26 E1/2 OF SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 5 AC. Millage Area O 261 Millage Rates O *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 8 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 4.459 6.5042 10.9632 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book -Page Amount 05/06/21 5953-480 $ 0 05/08/20 5765-665 $ 168,000 2022 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 262,500 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value (_) Assessed Value (_) School Taxable Value $ 262,500 $ 262,500 $ 262,500 (_) Taxable Value $ 262,500 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 241 of 403 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No 00404240000 Site Address Site City NAPLES *Disclaimer Name / Address VACAYNAPLES LLC 2540 ROYAL PALM CT City NAPLES State I FL Site Zone 34112 *Note Zip 134103 Permits (Provided for reference purposes only, *Full Disclaimer. ) Tax Yr I Issuer I Permit # I CO Date I Tmp CO I Final Bldg Type Land # Calc Code Units 10 ACREAGE 5 Building/Extra Features # I Year Built I Description I Area Adj Area Page 242 of 403 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Address Site Zone Parcel No 00404280002 *Disclaimer Site City NAPLES *Note 34112 Name / Address DAN D QUIN N REV TRUST 1895 TARPON RD City NAPLES State I FL Zip 134102 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 51308 L000 100 041 5B08 8 50 26 5 Legal 8 50 26 W1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 5 AC OR 443 PG 381 Millage Area O 261 Millage Rates O *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 8 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZON D AGRICULTURAL 4.459 6.5042 10.9632 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book -Page Amount 03/26/15 5136-1016 $ 0 11/05/01 2919-743 $ 0 2022 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 262,500 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 262,500 (-) 10% Cap $ 128,524 (_) Assessed Value $ 133,976 (_) School Taxable Value $ 262,500 (_) Taxable Value $ 133,976 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 244 of 403 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No 00404280002 Site Address Site City NAPLES Name / Tax Yr *Disclaimer ress DAN D QUINN REV TRUST 1895 TARPON RD City NAPLES Permits Issuer Land vided for referenc Permit # I CO Date # Calc Code Units 10 ACREAGE 5 State I FL Site Zone 34112 *Note Zip 134102 e purposes only, *Full Disclaimer.) Tmp CO I Final Bldg I Type Building/Extra Features # Year Built I Description I Area Adj Area Page 245 of 403 State I FL Site Zone 34112 *Note Zip 134102 e purposes only, *Full Disclaimer.) Tmp CO I Final Bldg I Type Building/Extra Features # Year Built I Description I Area Adj Area Page 245 of 403 31ft Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Address Site Zone Parcel No 00426680004 *Disclaimer Site City NAPLES *Note 34112 Name / Address MEYER TR, ULRIKE A ERIK H MEYER MARTINA MEYER UTD 12/13/76 41555 GLOCA MORA ST City HARRISON TWP State I M I Zip 1 48045-1450 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5B17 L000100 014 5B17 17 50 26 4.55 Legal 17 50 26 W1/2 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS S 30 FT Millage Area O 261 Millage Rates O *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 8 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 4.459 6.5042 10.9632 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book -Page Amount 04/25/00 2667-2616 $ 0 04/25/00 2667-2612 $ 0 04/25/00 2667-2608 $ 0 08/25/81 932-1425 $ 0 05/01/76 651-86 $ 0 2022 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 223,600 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value (_) Assessed Value (_) School Taxable Value $ 223,600 $ 223,600 $ 223,600 (_) Taxable Value $ 223,600 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 247 of 403 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No 00426680004 Site Address Site City NAPLES Name / *Disclaimer ress MEYER TR, ULRIKE A ERIK H MEYER MARTINA MEYER UTD 12/13/76 41555 GLOCA MORA ST City HARRISON TWP Permits (Provided for referenc Tax Yr Issuer I Permit # I CO Date Land # Calc Code Units 10 ACREAGE 4.47 20 ACREAGE 0.08 State I M I Site Zone 34112 *Note Zip 1 48045-1450 e purposes only, *Full Disclaimer.) Tmp CO I Final Bldg I Type Building/Extra Features # Year Built I Description I Area Adj Area Page 248 of 403 State I M I Site Zone 34112 *Note Zip 1 48045-1450 e purposes only, *Full Disclaimer.) Tmp CO I Final Bldg I Type Building/Extra Features # Year Built I Description I Area Adj Area Page 248 of 403 4* 0AABilosphS , 4P- md�l , 7:"t; ?L rm LL� Al LLJ 16 'T L LL _m mm _ &+eeq m = buileubisopanos #noo mao Z 0%zz Bmmz,� s ae Amm_�w#a7am60109E mm _O ( © I210 _ &+eeq m = buileubisopanos #noo mao @L$&ZL Bmmz,� s ae Amm_�w#a7am60109E 2.03.01 Agricultural Districts. B. Estate District (E). The purpose and intent of the estates district (E) is to provide lands for low density residential development in a semi -rural to rural environment, with limited agricultural activities. In addition to low density residential development with limited agricultural activities, the E district is also designed to accommodate as conditional uses, development that provides services for and is compatible with the low density residential, semi -rural and rural character of the E district. The E district corresponds to and implements the estates land use designation on the future land use map of the Collier County GMP, although, in limited instances, it may occur outside of the estates land use designation. The maximum density permissible in the E district shall be consistent with and not exceed the density permissible or permitted under the estates district of the future land use element of the Collier County GMP as provided under the Golden Gate Master Plan. 1. The following subsections identify the uses that are permissible by right and the uses that are allowable as accessory or conditional uses in the estates district (E). a. Permitted uses. 1.Single-family dwelling. 2.Family care facilities, subject to section 5.05.04. 3.Essential services, as set forth in section 2.01.03. 4.Educational plants, as an essential service. b. Accessory Uses. 1.Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right in the (E) district. 2.Fruits, vegetables, and nursery plants grown for both personal consumption and off -site retail sale, such as farmer's markets. Farm operations that grow fruits, vegetables, and nursery plants for off -site retail sale shall be subject to LDC section 5.02.00 Home Occupations, as amended, and the following standards: i. Farm operations shall not occupy more than 50 percent of the lot. ii. Farm operations shall conform to minimum setbacks established in LDC sections 2.03.01 B.2 and 4.02.01 A. Table 2.1, however, no side, rear or front setbacks are required greater than 30 feet. iii. Vegetation removal for farm operations shall be subject to LDC section 3.05.05 F, as amended. 3.Keeping of fowl or poultry, not to exceed 25 in total number, provided such fowl or poultry are kept in an enclosure located a minimum of 30 feet from any lot line, and a minimum of 100 feet from any residence on an adjacent parcel of land. 4.Keeping of horses and livestock (except for hogs), not to exceed two such animals for each acre, and with no open feedlots. Any roofed structure for the shelter and feeding of such animals shall be a minimum of 30 feet from any lot line and a minimum of 100 feet from any residence on an adjacent parcel of land. i. Notwithstanding the above, hog(s) may be kept for a 16 week period in preparation for showing and sale at the annual Collier County Fair and/or the Immokalee Livestock show. The following standards shall apply: Created: 2022-08-25 18:42:37 [EST] (Supp. No. 26) Page 1 of 4 Page 253 of 403 a) One hog per child enrolled in a 4-H Youth Development Program, Collier County Fair Program or similar program is permitted. In no case shall there be more than 2 hogs per acre. b) Premises shall be fenced and maintained in a clean, healthful, and sanitary condition. c) Premises or roofed structure used for the sheltering, feeding, or confinement of such animals shall be setback a minimum of 30 feet from lot lines and a minimum of 100 feet from any dwelling unit on an adjacent parcel of land. d) Hog(s) shall not be returned to the property once removed for showing and/or sale. 5.One guesthouse, subject to section 5.03.03. 6.Recreational facilities that serve as an integral part of a residential development and have been designated, reviewed and approved on a site development plan or preliminary subdivision plat for that development. Recreational facilities may include but are not limited to golf course, clubhouse, community center building and tennis facilities, parks, playgrounds and playfields. 7.Excavation and related processing and production subject to the following criteria: These activities are incidental to the permitted used onsite. The amount of excavated material to be removed from the site cannot exceed 4,000 cubic yards total. Amounts in excess of 4,000 cubic yards shall require conditional use approval for earth mining, pursuant to the procedures and conditions set forth in LDC section 10.08.00. C. Conditional uses. For Estates zoning within the Golden Gate Estates subdivision, the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in the GMP restricts the location of conditional uses. The following uses are permissible as conditional uses in the estates district (E), subject to the standards and procedures established in LDC section 10.08.00: (Supp. No. 26) 1.Churches. 2.Social and fraternal organizations. 3.Child care centers and adult day care centers. 4.Schools, private. 5.Group care facilities (category 1); care units, subject to the provisions of LDC subsection 2.03.01 B.3.f; nursing homes; assisted living facilities pursuant to § 429.402 F.S. and ch. 59A-36 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to ch. 651 F.S. and ch. 690- 193 F.A.C.; all subject to LDC section 5.05.04. 6.Group care facilities (category II) care units subject to section 5.05.04 only when tenancy of the person or persons under care would not: Constitute a direct threat to the health or safety of other individuals; Result in substantial physical damage to the property of others; or iii. Result in the housing of individuals who are engaged in the current, illegal use of or addiction to a controlled substance, as defined in section 802 of title 21, U.S. Code. Created: 2022-08-25 18:42:37 [EST] Page 2 of 4 Page 254 of 403 7.Extraction or earthmining, and related processing and production not incidental to the development of the property subject to the following criterion and subsection 4.02.02 C. i. The site area shall not exceed 20 acres. S.Essential services, as set forth in LDC section 2.01.03 G. 9.Model homes and model sales centers, subject to compliance with all other LDC requirements, to include but not limited to section 5.04.04. 10.Ancillary plants. 11.Public schools without an agreement with Collier County, as described in LDC section 5.05.14. Additional standards in LDC section 5.05.14 shall also apply. 12.Communication towers up to specified heights, subject to LDC section 5.05.09. d. Prohibited uses. 1.0wning, maintaining or operating any facility or part thereof for the following purposes is prohibited: i. Fighting or baiting any animal by the owner of such facility or any other person or entity. ii. Raising any animal or animals intended to be ultimately used or used for fighting or baiting purposes. iii. For purposes of this subsection, the term baiting is defined as set forth in F.S. § 828.122(2)(a), as it may be amended from time to time. 2. Minimum yard Requirements. See subsection 4.02.01 A. Table 2.1 for the general requirements. The following are exceptions to those requirements: a. Conforming Corner lots. Conforming corner lots, in which only one full depth setback shall be required along the shorter lot line along the street. The setback along the longer lot line may be reduced to 37.5 feet, so long as no right-of-way or right-of-way easement is included within the reduced front yard. (See Exhibit A) n 160 LOT WIDTH V R.O. W (Supp. No. 26) ESTATES: CONFORMING CORNER LOT R.O. W PIL R.O. W P; L 75' FULLFRONT SETBACK FRONT SETBACK 37 5' REDUCED BY 50,X, PIL 4 � a ,CK W SIDE 30' SETBACK V PIL * Example -lol width may vary, but never less Ih— 150' ROW - SETBACKS MEASURED FROM R.O.W. LINE WIDTH MEASURED BETWEEN PROPERTY LINES ROW _ LINE PROPERTY LIME Created: 2022-08-25 18:42:37 [EST] Page 3 of 4 Page 255 of 403 Nonconforming Corner lots. Nonconforming corner lots of record, in which only one full depth setback shall be required along the shorter lot line along the street. The setback along the longer lot line may be reduced to 15 feet, so long as no right-of-way or right-of-way easement is included within the reduced front yard. (See Exhibit B) ESTATES: NON -CONFORMING CORNER LOT R.O.W R.O.W 15, REDUCED FRONT SETBACK T 75' LOT > 10e%LOT 10 WIDTH FULL FRONT WIDTH L SETBACK I LOT WIDTH I W IDTH P(L 0.5' Pyt _— R,O.W 1i ) - 5LTBACK5 MEASURED FROM R.O.W. LINE - WIDTH MEASURED BETWEEN PROPERTY LINES R.O.W. LINE PROPERTYLINE — C. Nonconforming through lots, i.e. double frontage lots, nonconforming lots of record with double road frontage, which are nonconforming due to inadequate lot depth, in which case, the front yard along the local road portion shall be computed at the rate of 15 percent of the depth of the lot, as measured from edge of the right-of-way. The nonconforming through lot utilizing the reduced frontage shall establish the lot frontage along the local road only. Reduced frontage along a collector or arterial roadway to serve such lots is prohibited. Front yards along the local road shall be developed with structures having an average front yard with a variation of not more than six feet; no building thereafter erected shall project beyond the average line so established. Nonconforming lots of record, which are nonconforming due to inadequate lot width, in which case the required side yard shall be computed at the rate of ten (10) percent of the width of the lot. (Ord. No. 06-63, § 3.C; Ord. No. 07-67, § 3.C; Ord. No. 08-11, § 3.1); Ord. No. 08-63, § 3.C; Ord. No. 10-23, § 3.E; Ord. No. 12-38, § 3.13; Ord. No. 13-56, § 3.6; Ord. No. 14-40, § 2.A; Ord. No. 16-27, § 3.6; Ord. No. 21-05 , § 3.6) (Supp. No. 26) Created: 2022-08-25 18:42:37 [EST] Page 4 of 4 Page 256 of 403 2.03.02 Residential Zoning Districts B. Residential Multi-Family-6 District (RMF-6). The purpose and intent of the residential multi-family-6 district (RMF-6) is to provide for single-family, two-family and multi -family residences having a low profile silhouette, surrounded by open space, being so situated that it is located in close proximity to public and commercial services and has direct or convenient access to collector and arterial roads on the county major road network. The RMF-6 district corresponds to and implements the urban mixed use land use designation on the future land use map of the Collier County GMP. The maximum density permissible in the RMF-6 district and the urban mixed use land use designation shall be guided, in part, by the density rating system contained in the future land use element of the Collier County GMP. The maximum density permissible or permitted in the RMF-6 district shall not exceed the density permissible under the density rating system, except as permitted by policies contained in the future land use element. 1. The following subsections identify the uses that are permissible by right and the uses that are allowable as accessory or conditional uses in the RMF-6 district. a. Permitted uses. 1.Single-family dwellings. 2.Duplexes, two-family dwellings. 3.Multi-family dwellings, townhouses as provided for in section 5.05.07. 4.Family care facilities, subject to section 5.05.04. 5.Educational plants and public schools with an agreement with Collier County, as described in LDC section 5.05.14; however, any high school located in this district is subject to a compatibility review as described in LDC section 10.02.03. b. Accessory uses. 1.Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right in the RMF- 6 district. 2.Private docks and boathouses, subject to section 5.03.06. 3.Recreational facilities that serve as an integral part of a residential development and have been designated, reviewed and approved on a site development plan or preliminary subdivision plat for that development. Recreational facilities may include, but are not limited to, golf course, clubhouse, community center building and tennis facilities, playgrounds and playfields. C. Conditional uses. The following uses are permissible as conditional uses in the RMF-6 district, subject to the standards and procedures established in LDC section 10.08.00. 1.Churches. 2.Schools, private. Also, "Ancillary Plants" for public schools. 3.Child care centers and adult day care centers. 4.Civic and cultural facilities. 5.Recreational facilities not accessory to principal use. 6.Group care facilities (category I and 11); care units; nursing homes; assisted living facilities pursuant to § 429.02 F.S. and ch. 59A-36 F.A.C; and continuing care retirement Created: 2022-08-25 18:42:37 [EST] (Supp. No. 26) Page 1 of 2 Page 257 of 403 communities pursuant to ch. 651 F.S. and ch. 690-193 F.A.C.; all subject to LDC section 5.05.04. 7.Noncommercial boat launch facilities, subject to the applicable review criteria set forth in section 5.03.06. 8.Cluster development, subject to section 4.02.04, except for affordable housing projects which qualify under section 4.02.39 C. which do not require a conditional use. 9.Model homes and model sales centers, subject to compliance with all other LDC requirements, to include but not limited to, section 5.04.04. 10.Public schools without an agreement with Collier County, as described in LDC section 5.05.14. Additional standards in LDC section 5.05.14 shall also apply; however, any high school located in this district is subject to a compatibility review as described in LDC section 10.02.03. d. Prohibited animals in residential districts. The following animals are to be considered farm animals and are not permitted to be kept in residential districts except as provided for in zoning district regulations: turkeys, chickens, ducks, geese, pigs, horses, cows, goats, hogs, and the like. (Ord. No. 08-11, § 3.E; Ord. No. 16-27, § 3.C; Ord. No. 21-05 , § 3.C) (Supp. No. 26) Created: 2022-08-25 18:42:37 [EST] Page 2 of 2 Page 258 of 403 4.02.01 Dimensional Standards for Principal Uses in Base Zoning Districts A. The following tables describe the dimensional standards pertaining to base zoning districts. Site design requirements apply to the principal building on each site. Table 1. Lot Design Requirements for Principal Uses in Base Zoning Districts. Zoning District Minimum Lot Minimum Lot Width Maximum Area (linear feet) Building Coverage (square feet) (%) E 98,010 150 None RMF-6 S.F. 6,500 60 None Duplex 12,000 80 3+ units 1 5,500 per unit 1 100 Table 2. Building Dimension Standards for Principal Uses in Base Zoning Districts. Zoning District Maximum Minimum Minimum Floor Area of Floor Area Building Distance Buildings Ratio Height Between (square feet) N (feet) Buildings E 30 None 1,000 None RMF-6 35 A 750 None A = 50% of the sum of the heights of the buildings, but not less than 15 feet. B = 50% of the sum of the heights of the buildings. C = Buildings within 100 feet of an adjoining district are limited to the height of the most restrictive of an adjoining district. D = 50% of the sum of the heights of the buildings, but not less than 25 feet. 1. Principal Structure Minimum Yard (Setback) Requirements: Table 2.1, below, provides the minimum yard requirements for principal structures on conforming lots of record in base zoning districts. The following shall apply for all other lots: a. Corner Lots: Corner lots shall have front yards along each street frontage. The other yards shall be considered side yards. See LDC section 2.03.01 for Estates setbacks. b. Nonconforming Lots of Record: Minimum yard requirements for nonconforming lots of record are provided in LDC section 9.03.03 A. Table 2.1- TABLE OF MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS (SETBACKS) FOR BASE ZONING DISTRICTS Note as to setback line measurement: minimum setback lines are typically measured from the legal boundary of a lot, regardless of all easements burdening a lot, with the exception of easements that comprise a road right-of- way where the minimum setback line is to be measured from the road right-of-way easement line. (Supp. No. 26) Created: 2022-08-25 18:42:46 [EST] Page 1 of 4 Page 259 of 403 Zoning Minimum Minimum Side Yard (feet) Minimum Rear Yard (feet) Public School district Front Requirements Yard (feet) E 75 30 75 x RMF-6 I S.F.25 10 7.5 20 x Duplex 10 10 20 25 15 15 20 3 + units 30 x = for principal structures: 50 feet from all property lines; for accessory structures: 25 feet from all property lines. B. Open space requirements. Usable open space shall be provided as follows, except as required in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District within the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. In residential developments, at least 60 percent of the gross area shall be devoted to usable open space. This requirement shall not apply to individual single-family lots less than 2.5 acres in size. In developments of commercial, industrial and mixed use including residential, at least 30 percent of the gross area shall be devoted to usable open space. This requirement shall not apply to individual parcels less than five acres in size. Historical/archaeological resources that are to be preserved may be utilized to satisfy required setbacks, buffer strips or open space up to the maximum area required by development regulations. Conservation of such historic or archaeological resources shall qualify for any open space requirements mandated by the development regulations. C. Specific Requirements for Uses Involving Shopping Carts. When the operating characteristics of a duly authorized business require the utilization of shopping carts by customers, provision shall be made for outside storage areas to be illustrated on a site development plan, and said shopping carts shall be collected at the close of business each day and stored at the front of that business establishment. It shall be the responsibility of the merchant to collect any and all shopping carts that stray from the premises upon which they are intended to be utilized. A name -plate on a shopping cart shall be prima facia evidence of ownership. Exemptions and exclusions from design standards. The height limitations contained in LDC subsection 4.02.01 A. Table 2. Building Dimension Standards for Principal Uses in Base Zoning Districts do not apply to infrastructure in support of the building, such as mechanical penthouses, elevator shafts, stair shafts, mechanical equipment, mechanical screening, spires, belfries, cupolas, flagpoles, antennas, communications towers, water tanks, fire towers when operated by a branch of government, ventilators, chimneys, feed storage structures, silos, windmills, airport control towers, or other appurtenances placed above the roof level and not intended for human occupancy or for commercial purposes as provided below: Structural elements shall be no higher than necessary to accomplish the purpose it is intended to serve. The aggregate area of structures or appurtenances shall not exceed one-third the area of the supporting roof. C. Where this section conflicts with section 5.05.08, the provisions of section 5.05.08 will control. (Supp. No. 26) Created: 2022-08-25 18:42:46 [EST] Page 2 of 4 Page 260 of 403 d. The heights of these structures or appurtenances thereto shall not exceed any height limitations prescribed by the Federal Aviation Agency or airport zoning regulations within the flight approach zone of airports. (See section 2.03.07 C.). In instances where off-street parking is provided within the principal structure, the County Manager or designee may waive the maximum height requirements to the extent necessary to permit off-street parking within the principal structure, provided however: (1) the number of off-street parking spaces required by this LDC for the use involved may not be reduced; (2) the waiver in height shall not be greater than that necessary to provide for the off-street parking within the principal structure, with a maximum of two parking levels; (3) the waiver of the maximum height requirements are compatible with the uses on adjacent properties; and (4) for each off-street parking space permitted within the principal structure for which the maximum height waiver is granted, 300 square feet of additional open space beyond that which is otherwise required by this LDC shall be provided. 3. Every part of every required yard shall be open and unobstructed from thirty (30) inches above the general ground level of the gradedlot upward to the sky except as hereinafter provided or as otherwise permitted in this LDC. 4. Sills and other architectural and design treatments shall not project over twelve (12) inches into a required yard. 5. Movable awnings shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the yard is less than five (5) feet in width the projection shall not exceed one-half (1/2) the width of the yard. 6. Window- or wall -mounted air conditioning units, chimneys, fireplaces, bay windows, or pilasters shall not project over two (2) feet into a required yard. 7. Fire escapes, stairways, and balconies which are unroofed (except as otherwise permitted within this section) and unenclosed shall not project over five (5) feet into a required side or rear yard and three (3) feet into a front yard of a multi-familydwelling, hotel or motel and not over three (3) feet into a required front, side or rear yard of a single-family residential dwelling. Regardless of the extent of encroachment, the minimum requirement for separation of structures shall be maintained. 8. Hoods, canopies, or roof overhangs shall not project over (3) three feet into a required yard, but shall not come closer than one (1) foot to the lot line. 9. Fences, walls and hedges, subject to section 5.03.02, ground mounted air conditioners, unenclosed pool equipment and well pumps, are permitted in required yards, subject to the provisions of section 4.06.00. This includes air conditioners that are ground mounted and those required to be elevated to meet flood elevation, including their supporting structures, provided the minimum separation of structures is maintained. 10. Cornices, eaves or gutters shall not project over three (3) feet into a required yard, provided that where the required yard is less than six (6) feet in width, such projection shall not exceed one-half (%2) the width of the yard. 11. Except as otherwise provided by this LDC, when lots on both sides of an undeveloped recorded lot contain a residential structure whose front yardsetback is less than is now required, the average of the setbacks of the two (2) contiguous developed lots shall serve to establish the minimum front yard requirement for the vacant lot. 12. In commercial, industrial and multi -family residential developments, carports which are open on all sides may encroach into the required yards provided they do not encroach into the required landscape buffers, as required by this LDC; and furthermore, if the landscaping is deficient where the carports are proposed, the landscaping must be upgraded to comply with the LDC requirements to the greatest (Supp. No. 26) Created: 2022-08-25 18:42:46 [EST] Page 3 of 4 Page 261 of 403 extent possible prior to the issuance of a building permit for said carports. This shall be accomplished by a site development plan amendment or a site improvement plan approval. 13. Permanent emergency generators may be placed within the rear yard with a 10-foot rear yard setback. Permanent emergency generators may encroach into side yards up to 36 inches. Generators are not permitted to encroach into required front yards. For single-family and two-family dwelling units, see LDC section 5.03.07 for exceptions and requirements. Above -ground fuel tanks for the generators are subject to the same setbacks; however, underground tanks are not subject to setback requirements. In order to reduce noise during required routine exercising of the generators, this exercising is restricted to operating the generator for no more than 30 minutes, once every seven days, during the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and shall not exceed sound level limits for Manufacturing and Industrial uses as set forth in Ordinance No. 90-17, the Noise Ordinance, as amended. All permanent emergency generators must be equipped with sound attenuating housing to reduce noise. a. Facilities with fuel pumps. Permanent emergency generators and related fuel storage installed at existing facilities with fuel pumps may encroach into any required side or rear yards, provided the encroachment does not create a hazard to pedestrian or vehicular traffic. b. Assisted living facilities and nursing homes. Permanent emergency generators and related fuel storage installed at existing assisted living facilities or nursing homes that are subject to LDC section 5.05.04 E. may encroach into any required side or rear yards or buffers, provided the encroachment does not create a hazard to pedestrian or vehicular traffic. (Ord. No. 04-72, § 31; Ord. No. 05-27, § 3.P; Ord. No. 07-67, § 3.1; Ord. No. 10-23, § 3.Q; Ord. No. 12-38, § 3.J; Ord. No. 14-33, § 3.1; Ord. No. 18-18, § 3.G; Ord. No. 18-32, § 3.A; Ord. No. 19-13, § 3.A) (Supp. No. 26) Created: 2022-08-25 18:42:46 [EST] Page 4 of 4 Page 262 of 403 - CHAPTER 10 APPLICATION, REVIEW, AND DECISION -MAKING PROCEDURES 10.08.00 CONDITIONAL USE PROCEDURES 10.08.00 CONDITIONAL USE PROCEDURES A. General. A conditional use is a use that would not be appropriate generally or without restriction throughout a particular zoning district or classification, but which, if controlled as to number, area, location, or relation to the neighborhood, would promote the public health, safety, welfare, morals, order, comfort, convenience, appearance, or the general welfare. Such uses may be permissible in a zoning district as a conditional use if specific provision for such conditional use is made in the LDC. All petitions for conditional uses shall be considered first by the Planning Commission in the manner herein set out. Decisions regarding conditional uses shall be quasijudicial in nature. B. Applicability. Conditional use approval is required before the construction or establishment of a conditional use. C. Application. The Administrative Code shall establish the submittal requirements for a conditional use application. Conditional use application processing time. An application for a conditional use will be considered "open," when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. An application for a conditional use will be considered "closed" when the applicant withdraws the subject application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the conditional use, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and shall be withdrawn and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. The Planning and Zoning Department will notify the applicant of closure by certified mail, return receipt requested; however, failure to notify by the County shall not eliminate the "closed" status of a petition. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submitting a new application, repayment of all application fees and granting of a determination of "sufficiency." Further review of the request will be subject to the then current LDC. Findings. The Planning Commission shall make a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the conditional use to the Board of Zoning Appeals. The Planning Commission's recommendation of approval or approval with conditions shall find that the granting of the conditional use will not adversely affect the public and any specific requirements pertaining to the conditional use have been met by the petitioner. Further, that satisfactory provision and arrangement has been made for the following matters, where applicable: 1. Consistency with the LDC and Growth Management Plan. 2. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. 3. The effect the conditional use would have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects. 4. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district. Planning Commission actions. Conditions and safeguards. In recommending approval of a conditional use, the Planning Commission may also recommend appropriate conditions and safeguards in conformity with the LDC. Violation of such conditions and safeguards, which are made a part of the terms under which the conditional use is granted, shall be deemed a violation of the LDC. Collier County, Florida, Land Development Code (Supp. No. 26) Created: 2022-08-25 18:42:59 [EST] Page 1 of 3 Page 263 of 403 - CHAPTER 10 APPLICATION, REVIEW, AND DECISION -MAKING PROCEDURES 10.08.00 CONDITIONAL USE PROCEDURES Denial by the Planning Commission. If the Planning Commission shall recommend denial of a conditional use, it shall state fully in its record its reason for doing so. Such reasons shall take into account the factors stated in section 10.08.00 D. above or those factors that may be applicable to the action of denial and the particular regulations relating to the specific conditional use requested, if any. Status of Planning Commission report and recommendations. The report and recommendations of the Planning Commission required above shall be advisory only and shall not be binding upon the Board of Zoning Appeals. Consideration by the Board of Zoning Appeals. Upon receipt of the Planning Commission's report and recommendations, the Board of Zoning Appeals shall make a finding that the granting of the conditional use will not adversely affect the public and any specific requirements pertaining to the conditional use have been met by the petitioner. Further, that satisfactory provision and arrangement has been made for the matters identified in LDC section 10.08.00 D were applicable. The Board of Zoning Appeals shall approve, by resolution, or deny a petition for a conditional use. The approval of a conditional use petition shall require 4 affirmative votes of the Board of Zoning Appeals. If the Board of Zoning Appeals denies the conditional use, it shall state fully in its record its reason for doing so. Such reasons shall take into account the factors stated in section 10.08.00 D. above or those factors that may be applicable to the action of denial and the particular regulations relating to the specific conditional use requested, if any. G. Expiration and re -review. 1. A conditional use shall expire 5 years from the date of approval, if by that date the use for which the conditional use was granted has not commenced. 2. A conditional use shall expire 1 year following the discontinuance of the use for which the conditional use was granted unless the site was improved and/or structures built for the specific uses approved by a conditional use and which cannot be converted to a use permitted by the underlying zoning designation of the site. 3. The Board of Zoning Appeals may grant one 2-year extension of an approved conditional use upon written request of the petitioner. 4. If a conditional use permit is approved with stipulations or conditions, a re -review of the permit, stipulations, or conditions shall take place in accordance with the resolution approving the conditional use permit or by request of the applicant. Public facility dedication. The Board of County Commissioners may, as a condition of approval of the conditional use, require that suitable areas for streets, public rights -of -way, schools, parks, and other public facilities be set aside, improved, and/or dedicated for public use. Where impact fees are levied for certain public facilities, the market value of the land set aside for the public purpose shall be credited towards impact fees. Said credit shall be based on a negotiated amount no greater than the market value of the set aside land prior to the approval of the conditional use, as determined by an accredited appraiser from a list approved by Collier County. Said appraisal shall be submitted to the County Attorney's Office and the real property office within 90 days of the date of approval of the conditional use, or as otherwise extended in writing by Collier County, so as to establish the amount of any impact fee credits resulting from said dedication. Failure to provide said appraisal within this time frame shall authorize the County to determine the market value of the property. Impact fee credits shall only be effective after recordation of the document conveying the dedicated property to Collier County. Where the term Collier County, Florida, Land Development Code (Supp. No. 26) Created: 2022-08-25 18:42:59 [EST] Page 2 of 3 Page 264 of 403 - CHAPTER 10 APPLICATION, REVIEW, AND DECISION -MAKING PROCEDURES 10.08.00 CONDITIONAL USE PROCEDURES Collier County is used in this section, it shall be construed to include the Collier County Water and Sewer District or other agency or dependent district of Collier County Government. Land set aside and/or to be improved as committed as part of the conditional use approval shall be deeded or dedicated to Collier County within 90 days of receipt of notification by the county that the property is needed for certain pending public improvements or as otherwise approved by the Board of County Commissioners during the conditional use process. In any case, however, the County shall take title to set aside property, at the latest, by a date certain established during, and conditioned on, the approval of the conditional use. The land set aside and/or to be improved shall be made free and clear of all liens, encumbrances and improvements, at the developer's sole expense, except as otherwise approved by the Board. Failure to complete the dedication within the appropriate time frame noted above may result in a recommendation to the Board of reconsideration of approved conditional use and may result in a violation of the LDC pursuant to section 8.08.00. Should said dedication of land also include agreed upon improvements, said improvements shall be completed and accepted by the Collier County Board of Commissioners at the development phase which has infrastructure improvements available to the parcel of land upon which said improvements are to be made, or at a specified time provided for within the resolution approving the conditional use. Conditional usesfor school or religious purposes. A use which has been approved as part of a preliminary subdivision plat or a planned unit development for schools, religious or eleemosynary uses shall be exempt from the provisions of this section. Such uses must comply with the provisions of section 10.02.03, site development plan approval, as applicable, and all other zoning requirements. Changes and amendments. The County Manager or designee may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by the conditional use. Additional uses or expansion of permitted uses not shown on the conceptual site development plan or otherwise specifically provided for in the conditional use application shall require the submission, review, and approval of a new conditional use application. (Ord. No. 05-27, § 3.000; Ord. No. 06-07, § 3.Y; Ord. No. 12-38, § 3.LL; Ord. No. 13-56, § 3.VV) Collier County, Florida, Land Development Code (Supp. No. 26) Created: 2022-08-25 18:42:59 [EST] Page 3 of 3 Page 265 of 403 COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER ABE SKINNER, C.F.A. 3950 Radio Road, Naples, Florida 34104-3750 Phone: (239) 252-8141 Fax: (239) 252-2071 www.collierappraiser.com Property Combine or Split Request Form For Taxin! Purposes Only Combining or Dividing property with this form is for "Tax Billing" purposes only and does not comply with any other county or government regulations. Please contact the appropriate land development or planning and zoning department for your jurisdiction for questions concerning the development of the parcel(s). By requesting to have your property either split or combined you acknowledge the possibility of loss of assessment reduction received through the Save Our Homes Benefit, 10% Non -Homestead Cap or Agricultural Classification. Instructions: Please read and cornj2lctc the form sign, date and return to our office. Request made on or before September 1" will appear on the next Tax Roll except (1). CCPA will "Combine" parcels that are contiguous, adjacent and ownership is identical. CCPA will "Divide" parcels that are unimproved. If improved, a site plan must be submitted locating all buildings and structures. (1) Improvements are assessed as of December 31"of prior year. Any improvements that overlap split lines will not be divided until tax roll year improvements are removed. (Ex. Removed by December 31" 2018 worked for 2019 Tax Roll, Removed by December 31" 2019 worked for 2020 Tax Roll ete.l It is hereby requested by the Owner(s) of record to combine or split the follois ing parecl(s). Combine: Property ID #(s) Split: Property ID #(s) New (Revised) Legal Descriptions: Property Owner(s) Name: CHECK — ONE Rcquested for: Permitting: Multiple tax bills: Other: Comments: Owner(s) Signature: Date: ALL REQUESTS MUST HAVE OWNER'S SIGNATURE, PHOTO ID REQUIRED. Telephone # ( Tax Roll Year Received by: Fax # ( to be worked. Date: Revised 4/28/2020 P:1Forms\CCPA_Split_Combine_2020.doc Page 266 of 403 CUffIeY County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierxov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR: CONDITIONAL USE LDC Section 10.08.00 & Code of Laws section 2-83 — 2-90 Chapter 3 C.1 of the Administrative Code PETITION NO (PL) PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ❑ A CONDITIONAL USE TO BE HEARD BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ❑ A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE TO BE HEARD BY THE OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): One Life Church Naples, Inc. Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 28290 Old 41 Rd Unit 16 Telephone. 239-301-4947 Cell: Fort Construction Group of Naples, Inc. City: Bonita Springs State: FL E-Mail Address: Brooksw@fcgflorida.com Name of Agent(s): Brooks Witcher Firm: Fort Construction Group of Naples, Inc. Address: 28290 Old 41 Rd Unit 16 Telephone: 239-301-4947 Cell: Fax: City: Bonita Springs State: FL E-Mail Address: Brooksw@fcgflorida.com Fax: ZIP: 34135 ZIP: 34135 BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 5/08/2018 Page 1 of 12 Page 267 of 403 CUffIBY County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net ASSOCIATIONS 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: PROPERTY INFORMATION On separate page, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Property I.D. Number: 00404280002, 00404240000, 00426680004 plat Book: Page #: Section/Township/Range: 17 / 50 / 26 Subdivision: Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds Description: 8 50 26 W1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 5 AC OR 443 PG 381 Size of Property: ft. X ft. = Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 15+/- Address/ General Location of Subject Property: Southwest corner of Santa Barbara/Crews Road 5/08/2018 Page 2 of 12 Page 268 of 403 CUffIeY County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning land Use N Falling Waters PUD PUD preserve S Youth Haven PUD, RMF-6 PUD preserve, multi -family E ROW Santa Barbara Blvd. W RMF-6 Multi -family, single-family and vacant property If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property: (If space is inadequate, attach on a separate page) Section/Township/Range: 17 / 50 / 26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page # Metes & Bounds Description: _ Property I.D. Number: 00404280002, 00404240000, 00426680004 17 50 26 W1/2 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS S 30 FT CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST DETAIL Type of Conditional Use: This application is requesting a conditional use as allowed, pursuant to LDC section 2.03.00, of the EE, RMF-6 zoning district for Churches (type of use). Present Use of the Property: Vacant 5/08/2018 Page 3 of 12 Page 269 of 403 CO&T County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC section 10.08.00 and Chapter 3 CA of the Administrative Code, staff's recommendation to the reviewing body shall be based upon a finding that the granting of the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and that the specific requirements governing the individual conditional use, if any, have been met. Further, satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning the following matters, where applicable. On a separate page, provide a narrative statement describing a request for a conditional use and a detailed response to the criteria listed below. Specify how and why the request is consistent with each of the criteria. a. Describe how the project is consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan. Include information on how the request is consistent with the applicable section or portions of the Future Land Use Element. b. Describe the existing or planned means of ingress and egress to the property and proposed structure thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. c. Describe the effect the conditional use will have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic impact, and odor. d. Describe the site's and the proposed use's compatibility with adjacent properties and other properties in the district. e. Please provide any additional information which you may feel is relevant to this request. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? N/A Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ No 0 Yes (If yes please provide copies.) 5/08/2018 Page 4 of 12 Page 270 of 403 CUffIeY County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 141fit "ITHA01gel 911j9141CA9.190 &1101,11161 FOR CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Fort Construction Group of Naples, Inc Address: 28290 Old 41 Rd Unit 16 City: Bonita springs State: FL Telephone: 239-301-4947 Cell: E-Mail Address: brooksw@fcgflorida.com Address of Subject Property (If available): City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34112 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section/Township/Range: 8 J1 50 / 26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Metes & Bounds Description: Check applicable system: Fax: ZIP: 34135 Property I.D. Number: 00404280002, 00404240000, 00426680004 APE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System X❑ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name:. d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ (GPD Capacity): e. Septic System ❑ Collier County 16 MGD TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System 0 b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ PROVIDE NAME Collier County d. Private System (Well) ❑ Total Population to be served: 400 Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 2184 Average Daily: B. Sewer -Peak: 5,288 Average Daily: We 1 1200 5/08/2018 Page 5 of 12 Page 271 of 403 CO&T County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: 12/6/2025 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Project will be tied into public sewer system County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 5/08/2018 Page 6 of 12 Page 272 of 403 CUffIBY County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of F.S. §695. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the assigned Principal Planner, Zoning Services Department, within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. 5/08/2018 Page 7 of 12 Page 273 of 403 CUffIBY County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ A Conditional Use to be heard by the Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals ❑ A Minor Conditional Use to be heard by the Office of the Hearing Examiner Chapter 3 C.1. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. Requirements for Review # Of Copies Required Not Required Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 ® ❑ Cover letter briefly explaining the project 1 Li Pre -Application Notes 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 ® ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ® ❑ Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 ® ❑ Warranty Deed(s) 1 Boundary Survey 1 a ❑ Conceptual Site Plan 24" X 36" plus (one 8 % X 11 copy) ❑ ✓ Plans showing proposed location for utilities, if required ❑ Plans for screening and buffering the use with reference as to type, dimensions, and character, if required ❑ ❑ ❑ Plans showing the proposed landscaping and provisions for trees protected by County regulations, if required ❑ ID Plans showing the proposed signs and lighting, including type, dimensions, and character, if required ❑ ❑ ❑ Architectural Rendering of Proposed Structure(s), if applicable 1 ✓ ❑ Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ ❑ Statement of utility provisions (with all required attachments & sketches) 1 Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 �/ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearing. ❑ ❑ ❑ Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 Traffic Impact Study (TIS) or waiver 1 ❑✓ Historical and Archeological Survey, or waiver 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans * Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 ❑ ❑ * If located in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 5/08/2018 Page 8 of 12 Page 274 of 403 coffiBY County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the followine additional reviewers: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ GMD Graphics ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ Other: ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Communication Towers: ❑ I Mosquito Control ❑ I Collier County Airport Authority ❑ I Naples Airport Authority Commercial Mining: ❑ Impact Fees 5/08/2018 Page 9 of 12 Page 275 of 403 CioC[iBr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 FEE REQUIREMENTS All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 (to be credited towards the application fee if the application is filed within 9 months of pre -application meeting) Conditional Use Application Fee: $4,000.00 o When filed with Rezone Petition: $1,500.00 o Additional fee for 5t" and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee ❑ Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $300.00 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species survey review fee (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Fee, if required: Methodology Review Fee: $500.00 Minor Study Review Fee: $750.00 Major Study Review Fee: $1,500.00 Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Hearing Examiner or CCPC: $1,125.00 Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the BZA, if required: $500.00 Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Date Agent/Owner Name (please print) 5/08/2018 Page 10 of 12 Page 276 of 403 CoffIBY County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Public Participation Requirements LDC Section 10.03.06 B. or C. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code Notice for Minor Conditional Use Petitions Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Requirements: Applicant must conduct a NIM at least 15 days prior to the Hearing Examiner's receipt of the staff report and application materials in accordance with the applicable sections of the Administrative Code. The NIM shall be advertised and a mailed written notice shall be given to the property owners in the notification area at least 15 days prior to the NIM meeting. Mailed Notice: Written notice shall be sent to property owners in the notification area at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing. Newspaper Advertisements: The legal advertisement shall be published at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing in a newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement shall include at a minimum: • Date, time, and location of the hearing; • Description of the proposed land uses; and • 2 in. x 3 in. map of the project location. Sign: A sign shall be posted at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing date. Public Hearing for Minor Conditional Use Petitions Hearing Examiner: The Hearing Examiner shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing. See Chapter 9 of the Administrative Code for the Office of the Hearing Examiner procedures. Notice for Conditional Use Petitions Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Requirements: Applicant must conduct a NIM at least 15 days prior to the advertised public hearing. The NIM shall be advertised and a mailed written notice shall be given to the property owners in the notification area at least 15 days prior to the NIM meeting. 5/08/2018 Page 11 of 12 Page 277 of 403 CUffIBY County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Mailed Notice: Written notice shall be sent to property owners in the notification area at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing. Newspaper Advertisements: The legal advertisement shall be published at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing in a newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement shall include at a minimum: • Date, time, and location of the hearing; • Description of the proposed land uses; and • 2 in. x 3 in. map of the project location. Sign: A sign shall be posted at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing date. Public Hearing for Conditional Use Petitions Environmental Advisory Committee (EAQ The EAC shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing, if required. Collier County Planning Commission (CCPQ The CCPC shall hold at least 1 public hearing. Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA): The BZA shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing. 5/08/2018 Page 12 of 12 Page 278 of 403 (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the signs NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED Patrick Murray WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER PL2023000. 785 I I I N. Magnolia Ave Suite 1350 SIGN E OF APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX Patrick Murray, AICP NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Orlando, Florida 32757 CITY, STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 7V Patrick Murray, personally known to me or who produced and who did/did not take an oath. N K M%ssloN -, NOTARY N: PUBLIC p� 6.-, My Commission Expires: i tl' .!Lj Gj (Stamp with serial number Signature of Notary Public day of `M �� , 20 D" , by Printed Name of Notary Public identification Rev. 3/4/2015 Page 279 of 403 4++•_ 1�� .:� .�k#{' •fir 'F• Ll AL •� }. {�' 2ir,"• _, _ },'ti FAA. ilk-5' r LU CD co { i _ ** • _ } �' y KS. - .. 14 CD # a 00 41 CN CL IL" {�+�,*i•+� y;+' , k S' , ..�I��S�i' r5' •,O.{ y'l. jx.'I� a .F. r•sLr; � � � .4.r 1p pk ~i, i F. �- ��,� •_ ter, -: �' ' F '� .. � •� - _ y. :�,. 6/12/2025 Item # 3.0 ID# 2025-1964 PETITION NO. PL20240011350 BD - 388 Calusa Drive - Request for a 72-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, to allow construction of a boat docking facility protruding a total of 92 feet into a waterway that is 2,766f feet wide. The subject property is located at 388 Calusa Drive, approximately 90 feet west of Mangrove Lane in Chokoloskee, in Section 36, Township 53 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commissioner District 5 ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report 05232025 Attachment A - Legal Description Attachment B - Proposed Dock and Relate Plans Attachment C - Applicant's Backup - application and supporting documents Attachment D - Public Hearing Sign Posting 05282025 Page 283 of 403 Collier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JUKE 12, 2025 SUBJECT: BD-PL20240011350, 388 CALUSA DRIVE — BOWMAN/ILLHWA DOCK PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: Harold A. Bowman and Illhwa Cassidy 6197 Woodstone Dr. Naples, FL 34112 REQUESTED ACTION: Nick Pearson Bayshore Marine Consulting, LLC 2025 Monroe Ave Naples, FL 34112 The petitioner requests a 72-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.I of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for waterways greater than 100 feet in width to allow a boat docking facility protruding a total of 92 feet into a waterway that is 2,766± feet wide, for the benefit of the subject property. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 388 Calusa Drive, approximately 90 feet west of Mangrove Lane in Chokoloskee, in Section 36, Township 53 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. See Attachment A for a complete legal description. (See location map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property comprises 0.65 acres with 90 feet of water frontage, consisting of a mangrove fringe in front of a rip -rap revetment, located within a Village Residential (VR) Zoning District, which has been recently improved with a single-family dwelling. The petitioner proposes a 4-foot- wide finger pier -style dock facility with a 10-foot-wide, 15-foot-long terminal platform and two boatlifts, each capable of accommodating a 27-foot vessel. The proposed dock will extend 92 feet, as measured from the rip -rap line, into a waterway approximately 2,766 feet wide. The required 15-foot side/riparian setback will be respected on both sides of the dock facility. BD-PL20240011350 — 388 Calusa Drive Page 1 of 7 May 23, 2025 Page 284 of 403 CO i m / 0 HU PoOmIlptus it =1 I.. Z 9, 0 w S 0 U 19 0 j 0 N BD-PL20240011350 — 388 Calusa Drive May 23, 2025 Page 2 of 7 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: Calusa Dr (Right -of -Way), then a Single-family residence, Village Residential (VR) South: Chokoloskee Bay East: Single-family residence, Village Residential (VR) West: Single-family residence, Village Residential (VR) Collier County GIS --Remainder of Page Left Blank— BD-PL20240011350 — 388 Calusa Drive May 23, 2025 Page 3 of 7 Page 286 of 403 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. The property is located adjacent to an ST overlay zone, which will require an ST- permit for the proposed docking facilities prior to issuance of any building permits. The shoreline of this property is lined with mangroves. The proposed dock will be constructed waterward through the mangrove fringe. The access walkway will be four feet wide. Any additional impacts to mangroves will require written approval from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). A submerged resources survey provided by the applicant found no submerged resources within 200 feet of the proposed docking facility (Submerged Resource Survey exhibit sheet 6 of 7). This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council Board (EAC) review because this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. STAFF ANALYSIS: In accordance with LDC Section 5.03.06.H., the Collier County Hearing Examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a dock facility extension request based on certain criteria. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve this request, at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria must be met: Primary Criteria: 1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The applicant's agent states: "The subject property is zoned Village Residential (VR), which allows for single and multiple dwelling units. The lot's current use is single-family residential, which warrants no more than two slips per the CC-LDC. The proposed project consists of a single dock with two boat lifts." Zoning staff concurs. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion met. The applicant's agent states: "Protrusion at this site is measured from the rip rap line, which is more than 20' landward of the average high tide line. Meaning that at a BD-PL20240011350 — 388 Calusa Drive May 23, 2025 Page 4 of 7 Page 287 of 403 distance of 20' from the rip rap line, there is no water at all for the entirety of any normal tidal cycle (i.e., both high and low tides). So, of course, protrusion allowance of 20' is, in this case, not adequate for mooring or navigation of any type of vessel." Based upon Attachment B, Cross Sections AA and BB, Zoning staff concurs. 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel, thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Criterion met. The applicant's agent states: "There is no marked or charted channel within the footprint or near to the proposed project location. The nearest marked channel generally follows the contour of land around Chokoloskee and will be over 500 feet away to the south, east, and west. Therefore, no marked or charted channels will be affected by the proposed project." Zoning staff concurs. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion met. The applicant's agent states: "The waterway at this location is approximately 2,766' wide as measured from the Mean High Water Line (MHWL) on -site to the nearest opposite landmass. As depicted on exhibit sheet 07 of 07. The proposed dock will protrude a maximum of 90' from the rip rap line or 64' from the Mean High -Water Line. In the case of either measurement, the dock will not exceed 25% of the width of the waterway, and more than 50% of the waterway width will remain for public navigation." Zoning staff concurs. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. The applicant's agent states: "The proposed dock facility is oriented in the same direction as the neighboring dock to the east and will occupy a similar footprint. The angle of ingress and egress to both docks will be the same, and they will not interfere with one another. There is no dock present at the neighboring property to the west. Therefore, no neighboring docks should be affected by the project as proposed." Zoning staff concurs. Secondary Criteria: 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth related to the subject property or waterway that justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) BD-PL20240011350 — 388 Calusa Drive May 23, 2025 Page 5 of 7 Page 288 of 403 Criterion met. The applicant's agent states: "The shoreline configuration at the subject property consists of a small rip rap revetment beyond which is a mangrove fringe that on average exceeds 20' in width. Therefore, the Mean High Water Line (MHWL) on -site corresponds with the water -ward limit of the mangroves. The standard 20' of protrusion that the county usually limits dock protrusion to, in this case, prohibits the dock from reaching the water at all since protrusion is, in this case, measured from the rip rap revetment. As a result, a functional dock (one that actually reaches the water) cannot be constructed at this site without exceeding the typical protrusion limit. Zoning staff concurs. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area. Criterion met. The applicant's agent states: "The proposed facility will utilize only a single 4' wide access, and the terminal platform is a 10' by 15' area of decking totaling 150 square feet, which will be necessary for staging of gear. The total square footage for the dock will be 445 square feet, which includes the decking above the Mean High Water Level (MHWL) in the mangrove. This square footage is minimal and, in our opinion, not excessive." Zoning staff concurs. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel or vessels in combination described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion not met. The applicant's agent states: "The applicant's length of shoreline is 92', and the proposed vessels will be cumulatively 54' as well. Zoning staff concurs. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. The applicant's agent states: "The use of the facility will be for a private, recreational single-family residential dock, which is the same use as the neighboring dock and which is less than the multi -slip use that the VR zoning designation can allow. Additionally, the proposed dock configuration will be oriented in the same direction as the neighboring structure and occur entirely within the riparian lines and side setbacks of the applicant. Therefore, we do not believe that the proposed project will cause any major impacts to the views of the neighbors." Zoning staff concurs. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.J of the LDC must be demonstrated.) BD-PL20240011350 — 388 Calusa Drive Page 6 of 7 May 23, 2025 Page 289 of 403 Criterion met. The submerged resources survey provided indicates that no seagrass beds exist within 200 feet of the proposed dock. No seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.) Criterion is not applicable. LDC Section 5.03.06.E.11 stipulates that "multi -slip docking facilities with 10 or more slips will be reviewed for consistency with the Manatee Protection Plan (MPP)." The proposed project is for a private 2-slip docking facility accessory to a single-family residence in Chokoloskee. The proposed facility does not have more than 10 slips, and so is not subject to review for consistency with the MPP. Staff analysis finds this request complies with all five of the five Primary Criteria and four of the six Secondary Criteria, with the sixth criterion being not applicable. CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS: None. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved party may appeal such final action. Such appeal shall be filed per Section 2-88 of the Collier County Code of Ordinances within 30 days of the Decision by the Hearing Examiner. An aggrieved non-party may appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner to the Circuit Court of Collier County within 30 days of the decision. In the event that the Hearing Examiner has approved the petition, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceed with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. Any construction work completed ahead of approval authorization shall be at the owner's own risk. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner APPROVE Petition BD-PL20240011350 to allow for the permitting and construction of the proposed dock facility as depicted within Attachment B. Attachments: A. Legal Description B. Proposed Dock and Related Plans C. Applicant's Backup - application and supporting documents D. Public Hearing Sign Posting BD-PL20240011350 — 388 Calusa Drive May 23, 2025 Page 7 of 7 Page 290 of 403 Legal Description Description of Parcel G-8 A parcel of land lying in and being a part of Lot 11, Smallwood's Division, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 27, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast Corner of Lot 7, Smallwood's Division; Thence along the South line of said Lot 7, South 89 Degrees 14 Minutes 38 Seconds West 431.70 feet; Thence South 07 Degrees 19 Minutes 15 Seconds West 325.25 feet; Thence North 76 Degrees 09 Minutes 47 Seconds West 106.00 feet to the Point of Beginning of the herein described lands; Thence continue North 76 Degrees 09 Minutes 47 Seconds West 76.00 feet; Thence South 14 Degrees 07 Minutes 14 Seconds West 190 feet, more or less, to the approximate shore line of Chokoloskee Bay; Thence Southeasterly along said shore line for 90 feet, more or less; Thence North 10 Degrees 42 Minutes 35 Seconds East 190 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning; Together with an Easement for Ingress and Egress over and across the following described lands: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Lot 7 Smallwood's Division; Thence along the South line of said Lot 7, South 89 Degrees 14 Minutes 38 Seconds West 421.60 feet to the Point of Beginning of the herein described Easement; Thence continue along the South line of said Lot 7, South 89 Degrees 14 Minutes 38 Seconds West 252.25 feet; Thence South 20 Degrees 54 Minutes 43 Seconds West 21.52 feet; Thence North 89 Degrees 14 Minutes 38 Seconds East 237.16 feet; Thence South 07 Degrees 19 Minutes 15 Seconds West 282.37 feet; Thence North 76 Degrees 09 Minutes 47 Seconds West 167.75 feet; Thence South 19 Degrees 17 Minutes 9 Seconds West 20.09 feet; Thence South 76 Degrees 09 Minutes 47 Seconds East 192.05 feet; Thence North 07 Degrees 19 Minutes 15 Seconds East 327.87 feet to the point of beginning. Page 291 of 403 06 00 M U W ❑ Zp 0 o t- z z o w w a Mz J W 0 0 LL Z W W O } H Qvi fn o °'M O4 MLU az �L Z - ❑ (M L0L l. 0 o n 00 COLL pW= fn QpO W LU U UU U) w W o N Z z Z Q0 W ML0 N MU N J Q J r y Z U Z ❑ (q J O W a W �i0W �WU) U d Z = ❑ wo pp pcnz W Z 0 z � xt C7 w ) UaO U z W H U NO � <n -1zF-=LL -1 a W 00 N I ID i � O yet � O .fin J �M I1A :LU Li T • _ • G Y a LU • H 0 a c co 0 0 N OD N (6 d C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2456 - K&C Bowman, 388 Calusa Dr\CAD\CC\BDE set.dwg LOCATION MAP 3/5/2025 07-2 L W W • LL O ? • / YY IL • ' L) N IA O T AD �y I wo aZ 0::) a0 CO .y t Z ►" LL 0 U) w Q 04,IL DZy- m d N S 6 MEWui U _ Be O m m wa O Zow- Oi-ay Q w o w Z Q U x m X N aaoa W a:3a z Q Z _ J d Z Y L.1� Q vJ V! V Z 00 it � 1. Z '991 ! Z O Wa"- x� Q U Ar o�W 5 O Q Q X �n H p * o %� o Vi N cnco 0 x X o ° x OM X _ X q X W W i. t X o co 6d M x o o 'x o ;� q x x a z<U � Z Q 00 Q o � Q�uJ U) U) 2 a d L0 r �� r: 2 �❑ Q J U W ❑ Z LU ❑ .. 0 a M O 0 e') M N N M a_ C'\Bayshore Marine Consulbng12456 - K&C Bowman, 388 Calusa Dr\CAD\CC\BDE set.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 31512025 r (j AlLoOP W Z m�a w>s wz°w LL w a J o ° W. 1. o C/) Q lZ z WLU of Q O w c Z Q + d z N W Z C� J Q ,r Z W wa y o cQc CO C m G c w O 0 G = O O ww z W Y O Z zwwo J 0¢Oa d I oo Q r ¢O�wnrwq +X O co . , M ED X W \ NoL X O � Q cn �. s0& bo> X O m O 'zs CL ry. h I (O m —•o anw 14 OR, F: ., ft M h X O O ^Ov, �O O w X cs- 2 Q Q co W 0 X a- Z O60 am O _ oo� Z ae U)QJ 04 pYQ g J a °omP* a Q�- - 6g w U)2 z cn o QQ a1 V M O O It N m d C: \Bay sG��OYia�Odeeogir�q,48g(9i ni�658eJ1r$�,EBBS&�alrys28•'CGIYD.it�®dQ'�.€$C®i1�C1�C4R06� D3y�¢�4 $/5/2025 N° u0 w o w a LU LU Z CV Z IL a N W o®® �W z� Qz LLLL O a0 N W Z z Y U � CD Z o +1.2 LL 0 w p o Z J J_ Z L) o 2 +p 3' Q ) ° I �cn o W L z I W Q U IL J O U) ❑ Y I MM W o � (no -� 3' ° o o I O a 0 W LL `-' o LL O J m o J �I NI II a LLI -O VLJ OO❑O �/ Z❑ QZ I� Z I L W H O $ L.L �00LL ° +17 $, ❑Q d �x L.L W == c� c -0 • G 1� CABayshore Marine Consultinq\2456 -K&C Bowman, 388 Calusa Dr\CAD\CC\BDE set.dwq CROSS SECTION AA 3/5/2025 CD 0 I I c 0 N o u i w w a I I ooi� F W W I I U. Z in W J a U FT to O > z U) m �w I Qz 0- C7� > OJco T cV Q02 I = J�==) �C do2U) w w � 00 J ¢�mm V m Q m 0 O Z � I I acn �co cn �0 Q U m I I �YHCA ccp00� O UZ_ O p in J N Y 0 g W Of X Q 0Of Y U O of o I a� > c� I z l o Hg x CABayshore Marine Consultinq\2456 -K&C Bowman, 388 Calusa Dr\CAD\CC\BDE set.dwq CROSS SECTION BB 3/5/2025 0 0 S M O O •: W 0 D cZ m G �l 3- a c.� W z cn C:1Ba y sFW�aaeYim�QOaentt i6�8969 i Fl K`�85 BeJfi$�,E3B�&,41a1gs��OC:9lD.t8®B,Qff.€$EBi1&C�S4�t32frdPp �5/2025 W Z J Z Q Q 0") ► fi zo N w o w a 1= 9 i �m C� m OW 0 U Z CO aW �LU W OLU 00 2 m m co 0 0 00 rn N (6 d C: \Bay sFid�3peFim�QOaentt i6�8969 i Fl K�85 BeJfi��,EBB&�ak\s88�CC�1D38®doff,€$Edi�d'HA'�ERJ�VA�i/SI8APH85 Bowman BDE Petition 388 Calusa Dr. Chokoloskee, FL 34138 PL20240011350 BAYSHORE MARINE CONSULTING LLC Page 299 of 403 HEARING PACKAGE CHECKLIST A. Backup provided by the County Planner The agent is responsible for all required data included in the digital file of information for the Hearing Examiner (Hex) or the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC). DO ACCEPT DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. MAKE SURE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. PLEASE CONFIRM THE DOCUMENTS ARE IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED IN "BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT." Planner responsible for providing the County Attorney -drafted Ordinance for PUDs and placing in backup materials. AGENTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE PUD DOCUMENT — STAFF PROVIDES THIS TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WHEN THE ORDINANCE IS DRAFTED FOR A PUD. THE FINAL PUD ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT. [FOR HEX, THE REQUESTED LANGUAGE/ PROPOSED PLAN IS THE FIRST ITEM AFTER THE STAFF REPORT] B. Backup provided by Applicant: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS IN THE ORDER DESCRIBED BELOW. DO NOT PROVIDE DUPLICATES OF ANY DOCUMENTS. PROVIDE ONLY THE LATEST, ACCEPTED/APPROVED COPY OF THE BELOW DOCUMENTATION. IF THE BACKUP PROVIDED BY APPLICANT IS IN DISARRAY -MEANING IT IS NOT IN THE PROPER ORDER AND/OR THE APPLICANT PROVIDES MULTIPLE DUPLICATES -THE APPLICANT COULD LOSE ITS HEARING DATE. X Application, to include but not limited to the following: X Narrative of request X Property Information X Property Ownership Disclosure Form X Any other documents required by the specific petition type; such as a variance, a boat dock extension; PUD amendment, rezone request, etc. X Disclosure of Property Ownership Interest (if there is additional documentation aside from disclosure form) Affidavit of Unified Control X Affidavit of RepFesentati^^ Authorization X Drawings (may include Cross -Section (for BDEs generally), proposed Boat Dock(s) with Water depth, location maps etc.) NIM Information (Sign in sheet, notes, minutes and transcript/or summary) ✓ Include 3 thumbnail drives of video and/or audio Agent Letter Pkg. Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Environmental Data Historical/Archeological Survey or Waiver Utility Letter X Deviation Justifications Revised5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDESPlanningServices\Current\Zoning Staff Information\Job Aides or Help Guides Page 300 of 403 X Boundary Survey X Other documents, as needed, on a case -by -case basis such as relevant prior Ordinances, Conditional Uses, historical documents, any "private or legal" agreements affecting the PUD etc. X Submerged Resource Surveys may be included here if required. X _ flash drive with only one pdf file for all documents OR e-mailed .pdf file I understand that by submitting the above materials, it is the agent's/applicant's responsibility to ensure all materials are in the same order for flash drive must contain the documents in one pdf file. It is the agent's responsibility to ensure no documentation is left out. 5/21 /25 Signature of Agent Representative Nick Pearson Printed Name of Signing Agent Representative Date Revised5/18/2018 Provide to Agents G:\CDESPlanningServices\Current\Zoning Staff Information\lobAides orHelp Guides Page 301 of 403 Application Form Page 302 of 403 Coder CO1.nt y Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov Boat Dock Facility Extension OR Boathouse Establishment Petition Land Development Code Section 5.03.06 Chapter 3 B of the Administrative Code THIS PETITION IS FOR (check one): �✓ DOCK EXTENSION ❑ BOATHOUSE APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): Harold Bowman and Ilhwa Cassidy Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 6197 Woodstone Dr. Telephone: E-Mail Address: Name of Agent: Nicholas Pearson Firm: Bayshore Marine Consulting, LLC City:Naples State: FL Zip: 34112 Cell: Address: 2025 Monroe Ave. City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34112 Telephone: 239-404-7982 E-Mail Address: Nick@Bayshoremarineconsulting.com Cell: PROPERTY LOCATION Section/Township/Range: 36 /53 S / 29 E property I.D. Number: 26088570002 Subdivision: Chokoloskee Address/ General Location of Subject Property: Unit: Lot: 11 Block: 388 Calusa Dr. Chokolosee FL, 34138 / near southernmost point of Chokoloskee Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: VR / Single-family residential 03/2023 Page 1 of 7 Page 303 of 403 Co*eY Cau-int y Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N VR Single-family residential S ST open water / vacant E VR Single-family residential W VR Single-family residential DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): See attached Narrative SITE INFORMATION 1. Water Width: 2766 ft. Measurement from ft. other (specify) 2. Total Property Water Frontage: 90 ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: 15 ft. Required: 15 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 92 5. Number and Lengths of Vessels to Use Facitlity: 1. 27 ft. 2. 27 ft. ❑ plat Z survey Z visual estimate 6. If applicable, the distance between dock facilities per the Land Development Code section 5.03.06 H.1.d. ft. 7. List any additional dock facilities inclose proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: See exhibit sheet 07 of 07 03/2023 Page 2 of 7 Page 304 of 403 Cott ier COUVIty Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov 8. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are one (1) acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? 0.65 Acres 9. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property Yes No (If yes, please provide copies.) within the last year? ❑ I DOCK EXTENSION PRIMARY CRITERIA I The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25% of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50% of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) 03/2023 Page 3 of 7 Page 305 of 403 • Co er County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov DOCK EXTENSION SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/ unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage.(The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 J must be demonstrated.) 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) BOATHOUSE CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06 F, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the decision maker. The decision maker will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Boathouse request. In order for the request to be approved, all of the criteria must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Minimum side setback requirement: Fifteen feet. 2. Maximum protrusion into waterway: Twenty-five percent of canal width or 20 feet, whichever is less. The roof alone may overhang no more than 3 feet into the waterway beyond the maximum protrusion and/or side setbacks. 3. Maximum height; Fifteen feet as measured from the top of the seawall or bank, whichever is more restrictive, to the peak or highest elevation of the roof. 4. Maximum number of boathouses and covered structures per site: One. 5. All boathouses and covered structures shall be completely open on all 4 sides. 6. Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on principal structure or may be a palm frond "chickee" style. A single-family dwelling unit must ve constructed on the subject lot prior to, or simultaneously with, the construction of any boathouse or covered dock structure. 7. The boathouse or covered structure must be so located as to minimize the impact on the view of the adjacent neighbors to the gratest extent practical. 03/2023 Page 4 of 7 Page 306 of 403 Co*er COunt y Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Home Owner / Civic Association(s) that could be affected by this petition and located within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Civic Associations and Communities page on the Board of County Commissioner's website. Applicant is responsible for and shall confirm the current mailing addresses for each association as registered by the Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations. Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: City: State: ZIP: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: 03/2023 Page 5 of 7 Page 307 of 403 Coder Count Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑✓ Dock Extension ❑ Boathouse Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted or processed. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) ✓❑ Property Ownership Disclosure Form ❑✓ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized Q Completed Addressing Checklist Site plan illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline ❑ (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); • Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Signed and sealed survey ✓❑ ❑ Chart of site waterway ❑ I ❑ ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 03/2023 Page 6 of 7 Page 308 of 403 Co*er CDu14t y Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Historical Review: ❑ Addressing: Parks and Recreation: ❑ City of Naples Planning Director ❑ School District (Residential Components): ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: ❑ Other: Emergency Management: Other: ❑ ❑ FEE REQUIREMENTS: �✓ Boat Dock Extension / Boathouse Petition fee: $1,500.00 �✓ Pre -Application Meeting fee $500.00 ❑� Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 ❑� If applicable, an additional fee for Property Owner Notifications will be billed to the applicant after Hearing Examiner hearing date. (Variable) Fire Planning Review fee: $100.00 All fees are collected at the time of application. Property Notification Letters, if required by The Land Development Code, will be invoiced after the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov Signature of Petitioner or Agent Nicholas Pearson Printed Name 12/9/2024 Date 03/2023 Page 7 of 7 Page 309 of 403 Narrative Statement Page 310 of 403 BAYSHORE MARINE CONSULTING, LLC www.Bayshore-Marine.com 0 NICK@BAYSHOREMARINECONSULTING.COM • 239-404-7982 BDE Petition #PL20240011350 — 388 Calusa Dr. Narrative Description of Project Narrative description of project: (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): The property at 388 Calusa Dr., owned jointly by Harold Bowman and his wife Ilhwa Cassidy since April 12th of 2022, is a rectangular shaped lot located on the southern tip of Chokoloskee, approximately 530 feet west of Smallwood Dr. fronting Chokoloskee Bay. The lot is zoned Village Residential (VR), which allows for the construction of single-family residences, which is the current use of the property. The platted lot depth is 190' and the width tapers from 76' along the north property line to 87' along the southern property line. Additionally, the property line extends into the water and so the actual depth of land within the property ranges from 129' to 165'. The shoreline, which consists of a natural mangrove fringe in front of a rip rap revetment, exists on an angle within the lot boundary, and so can be measured at a length of 92 linear feet. There are no docks currently existing at the site. We propose to construct a single finger pier -style dock that would extend from the rip rap line (which is the most restrictive point from which to measure under Chapter 5.03.06 of Collier County L.D.C.) a maximum of 92' (including moorings) and provide access to 2 boat slips. The dock would be constructed of 2 distinct segments: a main access walkway, which will be 4' wide from edge of deck to edge of deck and 74' in length; and a terminal platform which will be 10' in width and 15' in length. Total over water area of the facility will amount to 445 square feet, including area within the mangroves. The terminal platform will provide access to 2 boatlifts, which will both be 12.5' in width on the lift pile centers. These slips will hold 2 vessel, not to exceed 27' in overall length, from back of motor to the furthest forward fixed point on the bow. The riparian area of the subject property falls within a mudflat that is very shallow for a great distance from shore. This topographic feature, combined with the mangroves on site make construction of a functional dock within the normal limits of Collier County's L.D.C. nearly impossible. The waterway width at this location is approximately 2,766' as measured from the MHWL on site to the nearest opposite land mass. The proposed dock would protrude approximately 64' from the MHWL, which is about 2.3% of the waterway width, or about 3.3% if the full 92' is utilized for the calculation. Additionally, over 2,500 feet of space will remain for public navigation of the area, which far exceeds the 50%-of-waterway-width retention requirement. In layman's terms, the more important detail here is that the proposed dock will not be impacting public navigation. Views should not be majorly affected either with consideration of the fact that although the number of docks along the southern portion of the island is limited, the few that do exist also exceed the county's usually allowance of protrusion under Chapter 5.03.06 L.D.C. Additionally, it is particularly well known that Chokoloskee is a popular fishing area, and access to the water via docks is a customary and common practice for the area. Page 1 of 2 Page 311 of 403 Lastly, as previously mentioned, there are mangroves present within the vicinity and footprint of the project. Therefore, the project has been positioned and designed specifically so as to provide the desired dock function to the property owner, and also to comply with environmental protection regulations of Chapter 5.03.06 J. of the Collier County L.D.C. There are no seagrasses present within the vicinity of the project, and so impacts to grasses are not expected as a result of the project. Considering the details above, we believe that this BIDE would therefore allow the property owner to make reasonable use of the waterway and docking facility for mooring and other water -based recreational activities with consideration to potential concerns of the neighbors, the public, and environment. Page 2 of 2 Page 312 of 403 Property Information Page 313 of 403 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel ID 26088570002 Site Address 388 CALUSA DR Site City CHOKOLOSKEE *Disclaimer 107 Name / Address BOWMAN, HAROLD A ILHWA CASSIDY 6197 WOODSTONE DR City NAPLES State IFL Site Zone 34138 *Note Zip 134112 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 8E36 219100 130 08E36 36 53 29 0.37 CHOKOLOSKEE 36 53 29 G-8 DESC AS: COM AT SE CNR LOT 7, S 89 DEG W 431.70FT, S 7DEG W 325.25FT, N 76 DEG W 106FT TO POB, N 76 DEG W 76FT, S 14 DEG W 190FT, SELY ALG SHORE 90FT, N 10 DEG E 190FT TO POB, OR 2053 PG 2096 Millage Area O 216 Sub./Condo 219100 - CHOKOLOSKEE Use Code O 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book -Page Amount 04/12/22 6113-4000 $ 407,500 04/26/18 5506-3917 $101,500 04/28/95 2053-2096 $ 87,500 10/01/87 1 1304-1273 1 $ 0 Millage Rates O *Calculations School Other Total 4.3132 8.3754 12.6886 2024 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 284,308 +� Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 284,308 (_) Assessed Value $ 284,308 (_) School Taxable Value $ 284,308 (_) Taxable Value $ 284,308 Ad Valorem Taxes $ 3,607.48 (+) Non -Ad Valorem Taxes $ 0 (_) Total Taxes $ 3,607.48 Values are as of January 1st each year. If all values are 0, this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll. Disclaimer: The actual total property taxes may vary due to changes in millage rates set by taxing authorities, the addition of non -ad valorem assessments, and special assessments. For the most accurate and up-to-date tax information, please visit the Collier County Tax Collector's office to see the final Tax bills. Page 314 of 403 Warranty Deed Page 315 of 403 INSTR 6237892 OR 6113 PG 4000 E—RECORDED 4/20/2022 7:47 AM PAGES 3 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Doc@.70 $2,852.50 REC $27.00 CONS $407,500.00 This Document Prepared By and Return to: Nicola L. Zagarolo, Esq. Champagne Title Services, Inc. 3800 NE 3rd Avenue Pompano Beach, FL`3i3064 Parcel ID Numbei Warranty IVA This Indenture, Made this a, Calusa Breeze West, LLC, a Flo State of Florida, grantor, and Harot address is: 253 Conners Avenue, P grantees. *Tenancy by April, 2022 A.D., Between Thomas Falls, Manager of limited liability company of the County of Palm Beach, .-Bowman and Ilhwa Cassidy, husband and wifAyhose e -VL 34108 of the County of Collier, State of Florida, Witnesseth that the GRANTOR for and in cord and other good and valuable consideration to GR hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and s and assigns forever, the following described land, Florida to wit: Legal Description is attached herewith and made the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10) DOLLARS, hand paid by GRANTEES, the receipt whereof is did GRANTEES and GRANTEES' heirs, successors (g end being in the County of Collier, State of as EXHIBIT "A" The property herein conveyed DOES NOT constitute the'HOMESTEAD property of the Grantor. The Grantor's HOMESTEAD address is 2379 NW 30th Street,,,Boca,Raton, FL 33432 Subject to current taxes, easements and restrictions of record. .Subject to restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any".6id taxes subsequent to 2021. " and the grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same agairtst lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. In Witness Whereof, the grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal the day and year first above written. Page 316 of 403 OR 6113 PG 4001 Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Calusa Breeze West, LLC, a Florida limited . laity company By: \ Thouils !t2 ; r aj P.O. AddrVi FL 33431 t��i�l\�l i Tyr 30th Street, Boca Raton, State of Florida County of ,t)psi The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by me` a,] notarization, this /� A -day of April, 2022, by Thomas Falls,'ik LLC, a Florida limited liability company who is personally Florida's driver license as identification. DOROTHY r: r E. P.-E�COOK fiAY COMMISSION # GG 921024 EXPL :ES: c eni6e _3 •:, a �: I� v r320 , � Sz rt o Thru Notary Fu<:iic tlec�ans�rifars isical presence or [ ] online of Calusa Breeze West, IxW or who has produced his Notary Public t My Commission Ex Page 317 of 403 *** OR 6113 PG 4002 *** DESCRIPTION OF A Parcel of land ly 1, Page 27, Public EXHIBIT "A" G-8 4 being a Part of Lot 11, Smallwood's Division, as recorded in Plat Book ;df Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast + of said Lot 7, South 89 De - Ap=, Degrees 19 Minutes 15 Seconds. Seconds West 106.00 feet ttjw-,e North 76 Degrees 09 Minutes 47 14 Seconds West 190 feet, more Southeasterly along said shore li 35 Seconds East 190 feet, more Together with an Easement for Ing er of Lot 7, Smallwood's Division; Thence along the South line Minutes 38 Seconds West 431.70 feet; Thence South 07 �st 325.25 feet; Thence North 76 Degrees 09 Minutes 47 int of Beginning of the herein described lands; Thence continue con,ds West 76.00 feet; Thence South 14 Degrees 07 Minutes E sS, to the approximate shore line of Chokoloskee Bay; Thence 170 90 feet, more or less; Thence North 10 Degrees 42 Minutes ss,,to-trice Point of Beginning; over and across the following described lands: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Lot 7,a wood's Division; Thence along the South fine of said Lot 7, South 89 Degrees 14 Minutes 38 �eco+idls West 421.60 feet to the Point of Beginning of the herein described Easement; Thence contin e a10' g the South line of said Lot 7, South 89 Degrees 14 Minutes 38 Seconds West 252.25 fee ;'Tll ehce South 20 Degrees 54 Minutes 43 Seconds West 21.52 feet; Thence North 89 Degrees f4 Knutes 38 Seconds East 237.16 feet; Thence South 07 Degrees 19 Minutes 15 Seconds st 2 37 feet; Thence North 76 Degrees 09 Minutes 47 Seconds West 167.75 feet; Thence South , 'Qegrees 17 Minutes 09 Seconds West 20.09 feet; Thence South 76 Degrees 09 Minutes 47 S on Js^°Fast 192.05 feet; Thence North 07 Degrees 19 Minutes 15 Seconds East 327.87 feet to the Ppinit Beginning. Page 318 of 403 Ownership Disclosure Form Page 319 of 403 Coder Count y Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Harold Bowman 50 Ilhwa Cassidy 50 b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address I % of Ownership 01/2023 Page 1 of 3 Page 320 of 403 CO�ler County 0 e f f* Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address I % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the 'I I IL.CI J, JLUL.RI IUIUCI J, UCI ICI lual ICJ, UI i.Jdl LI ICI J. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease Name and Address years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: 01/2023 Page 2 of 3 Page 321 of 403 Coder Count y Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov Agent/Owner Signature Nicholas Pearson Agent/Owner Name (please print) 12/9/2024 Date 01/2023 Page 3 of 3 Page 322 of 403 Affidavit of Authorization Page 323 of 403 FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION PL20240011350 1, f4A2o1.D /A lac v_; P4A 0 AsJr, TWWA (AO"( name), as (title, if applicable) of (company, If a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner=✓ applicant=contract purchasei�r9and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2'. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property, during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Bayshore Marine Consulting, LLC to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the `general partner' of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I decla\a that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true.� ,0 A 6o i ✓cc �saa� • Signatiue Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing in tru ent was acknowle ed before me b means of h sicalprese ce or online no arization this 3Q dayof g L hoc 20?`�, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) h�,�� ,� M z a �L/�+xt•_. ��' W% Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: ❑ Are personally known to me 01�as produced a current drivers license fz [] Has produced /f �S identification. Notary Signature: CP\0S-00)1-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 ```�IIIIIIO/'/ gin....; �% �� : •Notary •:°'.' �� My Comm. Expires: a June 2, 2025 w � No. HH 137343 •. s�pw�'e r1 111 OI```` Page 324 of 403 Petition Exhibits Page 325 of 403 ' 06 00 M U W ❑ Zp 0 o t- z z o w w a Mz J W 0 0 LL Z W W O } H Qvi fn o °'M O4 M az LL "'✓ Z D - ( co 0LU LL l. 0 o n 00 M COLL pW= fn Q❑O W LU U UU U) w W o N Z z Z Q0 W ML0 N MU N J Q J r y Z U Z (q J O W a W �i0W �WU) U d Z = ❑ wo pp pcnz W Z 0 z � xt C7 w ) UaO U z W H U NO � <n -1zF-=LL -1 a W 00 N I ID i � O .fin J �M I1A :LU Li T • _ • G Y a LU • H 0 a c C:\Bayshore Marine Consulting\2456 - K&C Bowman, 388 Calusa Dr\CAD\CC\BDE set.dwg LOCATION MAP 3/5/2025 07-2 wo aZ 0::) a0 CO .y t Z ►" LL 0 U) w Q 04 .` ❑ �.r. Z rT �z y- m d N S 6 MEWui K U _ D� O wQ o o� vi>aa - wow, O,ay Q w o w Z U x m X N aaoa a:3a z Q Z _ J d Z Y L.1� Q vJ V! V Z 00 it � 1. It Z i 0) C) � 'Sg� --;4 - Z O Wa" -x� Q U oU)W J ,x 5 O r Q Q I ��z _ X a �n G Z_ H c N cnco 0 X X a ° X OM X 2 X q X W W 9 X i. X o coIO 6d i=. -"x+ M x 0 x I? o 'x o ;� q x ; x a z<U � 00 Z Q Q o � Q�uJ U) U) 2 a d � r �� r: 2 Q �❑ J U W ❑ Z Q LU ❑ .. 0 � a M O 0 rl- M N M a_ C'\Bayshore Marine Consulbng12456 - K&C Bowman, 388 Calusa Dr\CAD\CC\BDE set.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 31512025 r (j AlLoOP W Z m�a w>s wz°w LL w a J o ° W. 1. o C/) Q lZ z WLU of Q O w c Z Q + d z N W Z C� J Q ,r Z W wa y o cQc CO C m G c w O 0 G = O O ww z W Y O Z zwwo J 0¢Oa d I oo Q r ¢O�wnrwq +X O co . , M ED X W \ NoL X O � Q cn �. s0& bo> X O m O 'zs CL ry. h I (O m —•o anw 14 OR, F: ., ft M h X O O ^Ov, �O O w X cs- 2 Q Q co W 0 X a- Z O60 am O _ oo� Z ae U)QJ 04 pYQ g J a °omP* a Q�- - 6g w U)2 z cn o QQ a1 V M O O 00 N M a) 0) m d C: \Bay sG��OYia�Odeeogir�q,48g(9i ni�658eJ1r$�,EBBS&�alrys28•'CGIYD.it�®dQ'�.€$C®i1�C1�C4R06� D3y�¢�4 $/5/2025 N° u0 w o w a LU LU Z CV Z IL a N W o®® �W z� Qz LLLL O a0 N W Z z Y U � CD Z o +1.2 LL 0 w p o Z J J_ Z L) o 2 +p 3' Q ) ° I �cn o W L z I W Q U IL J O U) ❑ Y I MM W o � (no -� 3' ° o o I O a 0 W LL `-' o LL O J m o J �I NI II a LLI -O VLJ OO❑O �/ Z❑ QZ I� Z I L W H O $ L.L �00LL ° +17 $, ❑Q d �x L.L W == c� c -0 • G 1� M O O 0) N M N M a_ CABayshore Marine Consultinq\2456 -K&C Bowman, 388 Calusa Dr\CAD\CC\BDE set.dwq CROSS SECTION AA 3/5/2025 CD 0 I I c 0 N o u i w w a I I ooi� F W W I I U. Z in W J a U FT to O > z U) m �w I Qz 0- C7� > OJco T cV Q02 I = J�==) �C do2U) w w � 00 J ¢�mm V m Q m 0 O Z � I I acn �co cn �0 Q U m I I �YHCA ccp00� O UZ_ O p in J N Y 0 g W Of X Q 0Of Y U O of o I a� > c� I z l o Hg x M O O O cM M N U) M a_ CABayshore Marine Consultinq\2456 -K&C Bowman, 388 Calusa Dr\CAD\CC\BDE set.dwq CROSS SECTION BB 3/5/2025 O O F- LU W LL o i `n w J y N •: W 0 D cZ m G �l 3- a W z cn C:1Ba y sFW�aaeYim�QOaentt i6�8969 i Fl K`�85 BeJfi$�,E3B�&,41a1gs��OC:9lD.t8®B,Qff.€$EBi1&C�S4�t32frdPp �5/2025 M O N 01. 0 �. c 0 0: a M w w c m u m Z 2 } U > Q LU Q W Z ry O 0 CO m W m W w0fn 1= �m C� m OW 0 U Z CO aW �LU W OLU 00 2 m m co 0 0 N co co CD (6 d C: \Bay sFid�3peFim�QOaentt i6�8969 i Fl K�85 BeJfi��,EBB&�ak\s88�CC�1D38®doff,€$Edi�d'HA'�ERJ�VA�i/SI8APH85 Primary Criteria Page 333 of 403 PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) The subject property is zoned Village Residential (VR) which allows for single and multiple dwelling units. The lot's current use is single-family residential, which warrants no more than 2 slips per the CC-LDC. The proposed project consists of a single dock with 2 boat lifts. This criteria is therefore met. 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) Protrusion at this site is measured from the rip rap line, which is more than 20' landward of the average high tide line. Meaning, at a distance of 20' from the rip rap line, there is no water at all for the entirety of any normal tidal cycle (i.e. both high and low tides). So, of course, protrusion allowance of only 20' is in this case not adequate for mooring or navigation of any type of vessel. This criteria is therefore met. 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within any adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) There is no marked or charted channel within the footprint or near to the proposed project location. The nearest marked channel generally follows the contour of land around Chokoloskee and will be over 500 feet away to the south, east, and west. Therefore, no marked or charted channels will be affected by the proposed project and this criteria is met. 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) The waterway at this location is approximately 2,766' wide as measured from the Mean High Water Line (MHWL) on site to the nearest opposite landmass, as depicted in exhibit sheet 07 of 07. The proposed dock will protrude a maximum of 92' from the rip rap line, or 64' from the Mean High Water Line. In the case of either measurement, the dock will not exceed 25% of the width of waterway and more than 50% of the waterway width will remain for public navigation. This criteria is therefore met. 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Page 1 of 2 Page 334 of 403 The proposed dock facility is oriented in the same direction as the neighboring dock to the east, and will occupy a similar footprint. The angle of ingress and egress to both docks will be the same and they will not interfere with one another. There is no dock present at the neighboring property to the west. Therefore, no neighboring docks should be affected by the project as proposed. This criteria is therefore met. Page 2 of 2 Page 335 of 403 Secondary Criteria Page 336 of 403 SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) The shoreline configuration at the subject property consists of a small rip rap revetment beyond which is a mangrove fringe that on average exceeds 20' in width. Therefore, because the Mean High -Water Line (MHWL) on site corresponds with the water -ward limit of the mangroves, the standard 20' of protrusion that the county usually limits dock protrusion to, in this case prohibits the dock from reaching the water at all since protrusion is, in this case measured from the rip rap revetment. As a result, a functional dock (one that actually reaches the water) cannot be constructed at this site without exceeding the typical protrusion limit. This criteria is therefore met. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) The proposed facility will utilize only a single 4' wide access, and the terminal platform is a 10' by 15' area of decking totaling 150 square feet which will be necessary for staging of gear. The total square footage for the dock will be 445 square feet, which includes decking above the MHWL in the mangrove. This square footage is minimal and in our opinion, not excessive. This criteria is therefore met. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) The applicant's length of shoreline is 92', and the proposed vessels will be cumulatively 54' as well. This criteria is therefore not met. 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) The use of the facility will be for a private, recreational single-family residential dock, which is the same use as the neighboring dock, and which is less than the multi -slip use that the VR zoning designation can allow. Additionally, the proposed dock configuration will be oriented in the same direction as the neighboring structure and occurs entirely within the riparian lines and side setbacks of the applicant. Therefore, we do not believe that the proposed project will cause any major impacts to the views of the neighbors. This criteria is therefore met. 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 J must be demonstrated.) There are no seagrass beds present within a 200' area surrounding the subject property and so no impacts to seagrasses are expected as a result of the proposed project. This criteria is therefore met. 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 EA 1. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) Page 1 of 2 Page 337 of 403 Section 5.03.06 of Collier County's Land Development Code (LDC) stipulates that "multi -slip docking facilities with 10 or more slips will be reviewed for consistency with the Manatee Protection plan (MPP)". The proposed project is for a private, recreational 2-slip dock associated with a single-family residential lot. The proposed facility does not have more than 10 slips and so is not subject to review for consistency with Collier County's MPP. This criteria is therefore not applicable per county staff's usual interpretation of the LDC. Page 2 of 2 Page 338 of 403 Boundary Survey Page 339 of 403 OYm a m0 J��O a O w0 n ZNN z\€�� 00 o a"m� wwwiz a3owwnw mx a`-'z_ w Winn p0¢ W2N FF O^ - O gz_ Z� 003z�wvOi�N�o 2 m yy0.1 � ps�a Ov01 KO40N��N�n U� -4 } Wiw I7 -mOm a m3w�3rco zo <O N3w333w A A Jo [� oo��wz�NJ - w ate✓' �Q�ao o o�00 v~iaam��pN -�_w3=�^ WWI CC$ oga4 v/"F 'pmrc i o€`oi o- ao _ ¢ _ _QZZ� owe Q a3aa o a w z3w?3�OOwm oi:mz - UNwmFFmFFOx4x0 O< Uom- �rrrrrrm aoa-ss380mi .oZ s Ni a .j{ a r z"rc �M'....pa $,Aa o n iom S e V) N N o i. i... � z o CID m d t Ism zoo aSa a.a.�" O / Wy Nyz 22 qW �k o > � o U 0061 a b JNOJ \ n / NOp06! m�vl, o/ i co / LL i 3.,b L.GO. bL gar a z o� U 3� O Submerged Resource Survey Page 341 of 403 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY REPORT OCTOBER 2024 388 CALUSA DR. CHOKOLOSKEE, FL 34138 FOLIO #26088570002 BAYSHORE MARINE CONSULTING, LLC NICK@BAYSHOREMARINECONSULTING.COM 239-404-7982 Page 342 of 403 Submerged Resource Survey 388 Calusa Dr. October 2024 1 INTRODUCTION Bayshore Marine Consulting, LLC (BMC) has been contracted to provide environmental services in the form of a Submerged Resource Survey (SRS) at 388 Calusa Dr. in Chokoloskee, FL 34138. The site is located within Section 36, Township 53 S, and Range 29 E of Collier County and can be identified by folio #26088570002. This resource survey will provide planning assistance to both the property owner and regulating agencies during any project review process. The subject property consists of a 0.37-acre parcel that can be found approximately 0.1 mile due west of Smallwood Dr. at the very southernmost point of Chokoloskee. The property currently contains a single-family residence and a mangrove shoreline with no dock facility. The property is neighbored to the north, east, and west by single-family homes and to the south by the waters of Chokoloskee Bay. The SRS was conducted on October 30t", 2024, between approximately 3:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. Site conditions consisted of clear skies with mild winds. Water clarity was moderate for the area, allowing for submerged visibility of approximately 1 to 2 feet. The ambient air temperature was approximately 84 degrees Fahrenheit and wind speeds averaged 15 mph from the East. The average ambient water temperature was approximately 75 degrees Fahrenheit. High tide occurred prior to the site visit at approximately 2:30 p.m. and reached approximately 3.2' above the Mean Low -Water Line. Low tide occurred following the site visit at approximately 9:11 p.m. and reached approximately 0.8' above the Mean Low -Water Line. 2 OBJECTIVE The objective of the SRS was to identify and locate any existing submerged resources within or around the riparian area of the subject property. Ordinarily, if seagrasses are present within the vicinity of a proposed project area, an analysis will be required regarding species, percent coverage, and impacts projected by the project. The presence of seagrasses may be cause for re -configuration of the project design so as to minimize impacts. The scope of work performed during a typical submerged resource survey is summarized below: • Conducting a site visit and swimming a series of transects within the project site in order to verify the location of any submerged resources. • Identifying submerged resources within the vicinity of the project site and delineating the approximate boundary limit of the resources. • Producing an estimate of the percent coverage of any resources found. 3 METHODOLOGY BMC has designed the methodology of the SRS to cover the entire property's shoreline and riparian area. The components utilized for this survey included: 1 Page 343 of 403 Submerged Resource Survey 388 Calusa Dr. October 2024 • Reviewing aerial photography of the surveyed area. • Establishing survey transect lines (spaced approximately 10 feet apart) overlaid onto aerials. (See attached Exhibits) • Physically swimming the transects while using snorkel equipment, GPS locating the limits of any submerged resources found, and determining the percent coverage within the area. • Documenting and photographing all findings into this report The surveyed area was evaluated by following the established transect lines throughout the project site as shown on the attached exhibit. Neighboring properties, docking facilities, and other landmarks provided reference markers which assisted in maintaining correct positioning over each transect. 4 RESULTS The substrate found within the surveyed area consists of a silty muck material with frequent shell debris and rocks. Depths increase gradually with distance from the shoreline from approximately 0 to 5 feet. During the submerged portion of the survey, no seagrasses, living shellfish, or other resources were observed in any capacity on the benthic surface with exception to some oysters that can be seen recruited on some of the neighboring dock piles. A list of species observed during the SRS can be seen below in Table 1. Table 1: Observed species of wildlife and vegetation within the vicinity of the project site Common Name Scientific Name Eastern oyster Crassostrea vir inica Common barnacle Balanus s . Common bottlenose dolphin Tusio s truncatus Red mangrove Rhizophora mangle Black mangrove Avicennia germinans White mangrove La uncularia racemosa 5 CONCLUSION The submerged resource survey was conducted and completed throughout the riparian area of the subject property and yielded no results. No seagrasses or other resources were otherwise observed anywhere within the vicinity of the survey area. 2 Page 344 of 403 6 PHOTOS Submerged Resource Survey 388 Calusa Dr. October 2024 Photo 1: Riparian area and survey area at subject property. Photo 2: Typical view of benthic substrate within survey area. 3 Page 345 of 403 0w go Z❑ zz wa �w ~ oo= M ~ LU F- ❑ M LU 0 U) LL N p r, 00 M M d Z W J fn N "I W LL W Q w U.)M Q(1) J U w U J 00 c Noo Wzz OU M� 04 00a M Z N Z U) Q W Z_JU Z �i 0� g w wp �WU) P Z = 0 N ui ❑ ❑❑ ❑cn z Z w00 � O U ?: O W W 0 Z J -J H W d' W H LLL LU U fA U d Z d > V/ W U � a Oz (n O LU � O LU V W M2 W v/ C:1Bayshore Marine ConsultingQ456 - K&C Bowman, 388 Calusa Dr\CAWSRS\SRS set.dwg LOCATION MAP 315/2025 k i ' o o L Li w� ?U WK Z oWao a� o1'o�a UZ 'o Z a v~i o ran O 1� W H a w w W J ."• z Z W >�/ Q J LL 2 W V XD IQ LD = w 416t V z O 00 o �? z NUJ ,U^ J W Q ILL W Y * NN V ' o Z) 'L Z U LPL Z oo p - m W i� N moo , - �� W x } U Z f� W t 86L m Wry -- W J �t W W Lu z O r " <T- -s ' � a W `? i *Z2 M V rl- It M ^M LL CABayshore Marine Consulting\2456 - K&C Bowman, 388 Calusa Dr\CAD\SRS\SRS set.dwg EXISTING CONDITIONS 3/5/2025 z U) ,• �' '1i Z wn� V w w Z m > w w 0�O W CO wOw < �U)fn(n �° Owmof �? X z0�Ocn w J O >J C CL 2 <2 zQ� L� W U LU O Q O � � zC� Q \W LL Cl) W a OW W cn 0 w W 0 w W m D U) M O O 00 It M N 0) m d John Kelly From: Maria Estrada Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2025 3:20 PM To: John Kelly Subject: 388 Calusa Dr.- PL20240011350 Attachments: IMG_8569.JPG; IMG_8570.JPG The public hearing sign was posted today. Maria Estrada Planner II Zoning Office:239-252-2408 2800 N Horseshoe Dr Naples, Florida 34104 Maria. Estrada(a)colliercountyfl.gov -S Collier Gaunt, (INECOM Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Page 349 of 403 6/12/2025 Item # 3.1) ID# 2025-1967 PETITION NO. PL20240011254 VA - 3620 White Boulevard - Request for an after -the -fact variance from Land Development Code (LDC) Section 2.03.01.B.2.d, for a 75-foot wide nonconforming lot of record in the Estate (E) Zoning District, to reduce the required eastern side yard from 7.5 feet to 4.2 feet to allow for the continued existence of a pool equipment shed and to allow a further reduction of said side yard to 2.95 feet to accommodate the structure's 1.25- foot roof overhang. The subject property is located at 3620 White Boulevard and further described as the West 150 feet of Tract 84, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 27, in Section 14, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Planner III] Commissioner District 5 ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report VA 05202025 Attachment A - Site Plan Attachment B - Survey Sketch of Boundary Survey Attachment C - Code Enforcement Case Details - CESD20210012586 Attachment D - Applicant's Backup, Application and Supporting Documents Page 351 of 403 Collier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION- ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JUNE 12, 2025 SUBJECT: VA-PL20240011254 - 3620 WHITE BOULEVARD — KOGOK SHED PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: William N. Kogok, Jr. 3620 White Blvd. Naples, FL 34117 REQUESTED ACTION: Kira Orangio Phoenix Associates of Florida 13180 Livingston Rd., Suite 206 Naples, FL 34109 To have the Collier County Hearing Examiner consider an after -the -fact variance from Land Development Code (LDC) Section 2.03.0l.B.2.d, for a 75-foot wide nonconforming lot of record in the Estate (E) Zoning District, to reduce the required eastern side yard setback from 7.5 feet to 4.2 feet to allow for the continued existence of a pool equipment shed and to allow a further reduction of said side yard to 2.95 feet to accommodate the structure's roof overhang. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 3620 White Boulevard, AKA: the West 150 feet of Tract 84, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 27, in Section 14, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject 1.14-acre property is a legal nonconforming Lot of Record as defined within Section 1.08.02 of the LDC. As per LDC Section 4.02.0l.A, Table 1, the minimum lot area within the E District is 43,560 square feet, and the minimum lot width is 150 feet. The subject property measures 75 feet by 660 feet, which equates to 49,500 square feet, as evidenced by the provided Sketch of Boundary Survey; therefore, the subject property is deficient in both lot area and width. LDC Section 2.03.0l.B.2.d states: "Nonconforming lots of record, which are nonconforming due to inadequate lot width, in which case the required side yard shall be computed at the rate of ten (Continued on Page 5) VA-PL20240011254; 3620 White Blvd - Kogok Page 1 of 8 5/20/2025 Page 352 of 403 81 (91} C1.D 84 LU F nI 103 143 - rF u 0 I G� W.A44s IS'9' K �:j, N CL CL ca 0 - --+ Q J r CD N J a_ e� N Z c O 4D 0- M O O co LO co N O) (0 VA-PL20240011254; 3620 White Blvd - Kogok Page 2 of 8 5/20/2025 SURVEY SRC TCH OP BOUNDARY SURVEY N WV"T 2021 FBA SLRYEY4 COW 11W FD< R11(E CdK11A.:IKN IK Logs m t " SKY04 00 NOT (0."11011 000 WIP NOT Kit COGINXIaN PACE ! OF 3 0O1 rat atom SU KWRT( IM FOR ►ArA 3 Or 3 Leland Dig ltallysigned by NAPLE�R KLO �� Leland DySard, P.L S LWAL 'mr PTIOM i DySard, P.L.S 13:3626-05'00'0 THE EAST 75 FEET OF THE t11EST 150 FEET OF TRACT $4, OOLDEN CATE ESTATES. UNIT -' NO. 27 . A Su90MSI0H ACCORDING 10 THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOR 7. PACE 17 AND IS OF M PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CERTIRRD 70 WILUAM KOOOI(. A $ Ifull, &W S E S 6Y02'A2 t 000 42' (G) CROr AOAO 1O O i S42%"rT.AON.LY O) EtLP"TI M (N °1 FMTE BLVD (so. Rw SCALE: 1- . 100' ` ma a rpmrtAKarr rOKt Np'3Iy}1 >y 7T 1M1 .� M S N.89'SI'Al'C 7500' 1q 0 r' 9 NarAFAst. fA IN' INO S.B9'LD'SOY. 75. P) N.B9'31'A/i 75.00' (G) ' S W40'SO'E. 7&00' (►) Am y ■ Iry + wr Af 1 Y[ BAR „A.\r 7• + T N1A It 61F NAGt a.as �S 7 } S�6T•16 T allggnA HON , gb 1t1H AYE Sw I gHg gHg (60' ROW)c � qs8 be tl}' 8wr_ 5 8� I N I 1 me or �ipP IRK7M Ir t= )T ✓N N01A ~1 KIAA NOT 10 SOALL 1 ]Pot sntw r NS r--Kt r p• ' ' rAr NRI# rcArt ro c07 LAE rO Irmt Is MAK E TS OF La LAC' 11d1Y r,E IiLM(PIf A) • 150' O �_ ALL LOCAUDW �VR l N ' }t 1 1 1 - 1 1 N 1 1 I \ 1 1 1 1 IDNC( 1 1 I ( M S1A LOT LR[ i0-II. 75.00' ■M q Is CERTOICA710N I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS SWAY WAS MADE UNDER LAY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE AS SET FORTH BY THE FLOM" BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS R MA►PERS CHAPTER 5417.06-062. FLORIDA ADMIMSTRAIIK CODE. PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 FLORIDA STATUTES 0(rA 101 10 SCALL cNfItyI (MIRY ONC START KUKIRY FrT - 50' MAW A %-, SEKIN,"1AS NNW FIFE . rW101JM 5NaW 1m `HAW TETAC v GlifAat Isy NNW 111' wW OL(A-N MEASURED KARNGS SHOMN ARE BASED ON STATE PLANE COORDINATES (FLORIDA EAST ZONE). WHICH IS GRID NORTH AS ESTABLISHED BY MOS. AS ACOCARED BY USING GPS TECHNOLOGY AND Is THE -BASIS Or KARINW MEASUREMENTS LAKL.ED AS (0) ARE THE CALCULATED CPS PLAT KAII NGA 0 1DO 200 BY __ p��A �I — RLE SUY DATE 02/01/2022 CLINTON MIMB . TAD-Pd CM PLO F2463 RONALD B. •AWNO PBM /GAYS WAND ► D76ARA PIS 038" MAR' R. TMRTAD, Cr1L PSM 0"M QUAIRY C011T OL o2fos12022 NOT VALID NTHOUT SURVEYOR'S SONATURE AND EMBOSSED SEAL BY K_ DATEE NOT A CERTNICAIM OF T11LL ZONING, EASEMENTS OR WIDOW OF ENCUMBRANCES FLORIDA STATUTE 5.-1705 (3) (0 W Olt KNCMyAFstS KOURED FOR CCNNSTWKbo N NOW PROPERTY OWER ANOCTD OBTAIN 11I11rTEN FLP00 ZONE DE$RMNAI)ON FROM LOCAL PERMTRNG, NOTE F APPUCABLL FENCES SNOM M[AINDR PLAMNMG AND BUITDING DEPARAEN7 PRIOR FO ANY COWS(RUCDON FLAW W AAO/OR C0NS11XKSTpY. m 00 M Lr[S (APMO[ LOCAftM Oar) 3884 PROCNESS AYE, SUITE 104 TE REVISIONS F.L.A. SURVEYS CORP. MAPLES. FL 3AIOA 239-403-16M FAX 003-UM N COVUNIC9 1711" r.AC. 6J 17.057 III (e) (4) (r tOCATNLN O LALENENTS GARA&I PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS A MAPPERS -LB 6569 130-.oA-Br M-sBD-2m I}-250-2 2 OORuw T1as[ ow ec(IF CK is n�R 10/03/2023 9220 BONITA BEACH ROAD. STE 200 SAIrNED. T11N5 KOg1AT10N NrST K URNSHKD 10 RB VAYTYCIN AND PROJECT NO. DRAIN". I SVJ PARTY CHIEF I AD KNITA SPRINGS. FL 34136 MAPPER 22-10016-SPC VA-PL20240011254; 3620 White Blvd - Kogok 5/20/2025 Page 3 of 8 Page 354 of 403 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: White Boulevard (Right -of -Way), then a single-family dwelling located within the Estate (E) Zoning District East: A single-family dwelling located within the Estate (E) Zoning District South: A single-family dwelling located within the Estate (E) Zoning District West: A single-family dwelling located within the Estate (E) Zoning District 0 Collier County GIS VA-PL20240011254; 3620 White Blvd - Kogok 5/20/2025 Page 4 of 8 Page 355 of 403 r. r M Collier County GIS Purpose/Description of Project (Continued) (10) percent of the width of the lot." The side setback for this property is therefore 7.5 feet. The petitioner requests the side setback on the eastern side be reduced to 4.2 feet to allow for the continued existence of a pool equipment shed that was constructed by a prior property owner. A further 1.25-foot reduction of the eastern side yard is required to accommodate the structure's roof overhang. No building permits have been located for the offending structure; however, the petitioner has agreed to obtain a building permit should this variance be approved. VA-PL20240011254; 3620 White Blvd - Kogok 5/20/2025 Page 5 of 8 Page 356 of 403 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (G ) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is in the Residential Estates Subdistrict land use classification of the Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. This land use category is designed to accommodate single-family residential development at a maximum density of one unit per 2.25 acres, or one unit per legal non -conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. The petitioner seeks a Variance for an existing storage shed that is accessory to a single-family dwelling unit which is an authorized land use. The Growth Management Plan (GMP) does not address individual variance requests related to land use. ZONING DIVISION ANALYSIS: The decision to grant a variance is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.04.03. Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size, and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved? The applicant's agent states: "This is a non -conforming lot with a lot width of 75'." Staff concurs; the minimum lot width by today's standard is 150 linear feet. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances that do not result from the applicant's action, such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? The applicant's agent states: "The encroaching accessory structure, a pool equipment shed, was constructed in 2010, prior to the purchase of the subject property in 2021 by the current owner. It has had no negative impact to the existing site." Staff acknowledges the shed was constructed in 2010, prior to the current ownership of the property; however, further notes that the shed is part of a Code Case (CESD20210012586) that was initiated by a neighbor in December of 2021. C. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work cause unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? The applicant's agent states: "Yes. It will be very difficult to move a structure that has existed for 14 years. The structure was already built prior to the purchase in 2021. It has had no negative impact to the existing site. We will be applying for a building permit for this structure as well." Zoning staff agrees that the property was purchased by the current owner in 2021 and has no doubt that a literal interpretation of the zoning code would cause practical difficulties for the applicant. d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure and which promotes standards of health, safety, and welfare? The applicant's agent states: "Yes." Zoning staff notes that the requested variance will VA-PL20240011254; 3620 White Blvd - Kogok 5/20/2025 Page 6 of 8 Page 357 of 403 accommodate both the footprint of the encroaching structure and the related roof overhang. There is no reason to believe that the existing structure would impair the standards of health, safety, or welfare, given that it has existed for at least 14 years. e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? The Applicant's agent states: "Yes." By definition, a variance bestows some dimensional relief from the zoning regulations specific to a site. LDC Section 9.04.02 allows relief through the variance process for any dimensional development standard. As such, other properties facing a similar hardship would be entitled to make a similar request and would be conferred equal consideration on a case -by -case basis. f. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code and not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? The applicant's agent states: "Yes. This structure has existed for 14 years and has had no negative impact to the site or neighboring properties." Zoning staff concurs; however, must note that the existing Code Case does not reveal the reason the complainant initiated the case. The only known violation is the failure to obtain a building permit. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation, such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? The applicant's agent states: "No." Staff notes that there appears to be a hedge along the eastern property line and that there appears to be a driveway on the opposite side of the fence. h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Approval of this Variance will not affect or change the requirements of the GMP concerning density, intensity, compatibility, access/connectivity, or any other applicable provisions. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: The EAC does not normally hear variance petitions. Since the subject Variance doesn't impact any preserve area, the EAC did not hear this petition. CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS: None. PUBLIC NOTICE: Notice Requirements for variance petitions are contained within LDC Section 10.03.06.F.2. The required Agent Letter was sent to all property owners located within 150 feet of the subject property on or about April 24, 2025, as evidenced by an executed Affidavit of Compliance contained within Attachment D. VA-PL20240011254; 3620 White Blvd - Kogok 5/20/2025 Page 7 of 8 Page 358 of 403 Notice of the Hearing Examiner meeting was provided by posting on the Clerk of Court's website and through a mailed notice to owners within 500 feet of the site on or about May 23, 2025, and the posting of a public notice sign on the site on May 27, 2025, as per a notarized Affidavit contained within Attachment D. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner APPROVE variance petition VA- PL20240011254, to reduce the eastern side yard setback to 4.2 feet for the vertical structure and to 2.95 feet for the roof overhang, to allow for the continued existence of a pool shed as depicted within Attachments A and B, subject to the following condition: 1. An after -the -fact building permit must be applied for and obtained for the construction of the storage shed, as described herein, in the specified location. Required inspections must be requested and, upon satisfaction of said inspections, a Certificate of Completion must be obtained. Attachments: A. Site Plan B. Survey Sketch of Boundary Survey C. Code Enforcement Case Details - CESD20210012586 D. Applicant's Backup, application and supporting documents E. Public Hearing Sign Posting VA-PL20240011254; 3620 White Blvd - Kogok 5/20/2025 Page 8 of 8 Page 359 of 403 Qa € 5 a ,s+w+numww.ovn o.mwmxun..a _ w ns� =Sep". _ J Z f0 w¢ i Z 10— ia iLf9 �' I.- �, t c a> x_ H LL U m e u a mw ^ vaziao��1S y W �} mom � � o w W W 1..L off;, €gym q.e =`�@s a "�� , , `�' =V� eo salt' oossv a9.....,n X I N 3 O H d 6J MZ° ' a L a 0 N J n W FT---- Z -------- - ---- s a<< W i IL Lij JO a SURVEY SKETCH OF BOUNDARY SURVEY NOT FOR FENCE CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR DESIGN COPYRIGHT 2021: F.L.A. SURVEYS CORP. THE LINES ON THIS SKETCH DO NOT CONSTITUTE OWNERSHIP. PAGE 1 OF 3 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR PAGE 3 OF 3 NAPLES, FL LEGAL DESCRIPTION : THE EAST 75 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET OF TRACT 84, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 27 , A SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED TN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 17 AND 18 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LEL ACE TIF/GgFO Leland Digitally signed by Leland DySard, P.L.S ee DySa rd, P.L.$ 13:36 26-05 00 0 p1pNt� s'PT'9 TE OF FLO pB S/0 [ SURVEY 0 CERTIFIED TO : WILLIAM KOGOK, JR of S.82°02'42"E. 409.42' (G) CROWN OF ROAD FIR 5/8'. 5.82'02'07"E., 409.29' (M) ELEVATION = NO ID 11.2' NAVD OPRM LOCATION WHITE BLVD. (60' ROW) CENTERLINEI EDGE OF PAVEMENT ASPHALT q• ALUMINUM FENCE � RIGHT OF WAY FIR 5/8" FIR 5/8" N NO ID ��C MN_ 1.2 ¢LUMN NO ID N.89'38'59"W. 73.77' (M) �� FIR 5/8" 1 N.893141'E. 75.00' NO ID Iy2gU N.89'44'40"E. 74.88' (M) 5.89°40'50"E. 75. (P) I _ N.89'31'41"E. 75.00' (G) 5.89°40'50"E. 75.00' (P) ICONC. IDRIV WAY CO APT SEED AID 6$5p2';�i 2 Zy06gy1� 9.0 '9 2.0 1FIR pA.E. W 75' OF 5/8" 5 8 O.0.a6eV1'� �6 AB �'Z5o TRACT 84 # 357 0.3' E sb°613 BENT _ 5 (n CENTERLINE 1 N 3 FIR 5/8" d 9.9 v E 9 14.5 4.2 = o o No ID 11 TH AVE SW o o N I _1 jio 0 C'o (60' ROW) GO m o t0 LJ 11 .3 110 GRAY w 3 O m N rn ro ° N o E 180' OF DEC ro m N TRACT 84 o PAD oQ 0 Zz I 7.5' vi vi HOUSE/FENCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE DISTANCE FROM HOUSE TO LOT LINE LOT LINE DISTANCE FROM FENCE TO LOT LINE (FENCE IS INSIDE E 75' OE .THE PROPERTY AT IW 150. OF ALL LOCATIONS TRACT 84 1 235,1 II I I I I I CERTIFICATION : I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS & MAPPERS CHAPTER 5J17.05-052, FLORIDA ADMINSTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 FLORIDA STATUTES. FIR 5/8" #8357 I I I I FIR 5/8" FIR 51) 1NO ID NO ID S.89'30'55"W. 74.83' (M) S.89°31'41"W. 75.00' (G) N.89°40'50"W. 75.00' (P) TRACT 85 'I N W � E i SCALE: 1" — 100' DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 5.7' o COVERED ENTRY ONE STORY RESIDENCE FEE _ 15.0' NAVD 5g.2' ^ COVERED AREA SCREENED IN PULL FFE = 11.0' NAVD \ 20.2 N `GARAGE 20.2 OVER -HANG rt = 4.3' NAVD FEE _ POOL s,g• 12.5• NAVD EQUIP. SHE Li L CON WA NC CONC � FEE /= FEE _ 13.3' NAVD 11.1' NAVD MEASURED BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON STATE PLANE COORDINATES (FLORIDA EAST ZONE), WHICH IS GRID NORTH AS ESTABLISHED BY NOS, AS ACQUIRED BY USING GPS TECHNOLOGY AND IS THE "BASIS OF BEARINGS". MEASUREMENTS LABELED AS (G) ARE THE CALCULATED GPS PLAT BEARINGS. 0 100 200 BY : _ SURVEY DATE : _02/01/2022 CLINTON W. FINSTAD, , CFM, PLS #2453 RONALD W. WALLING PSM #6473 LELAND F. DySARD, PLS #3859 MARY E. FINSTAD, CFM, PSM #5901 QUALITY CONTROL NOT VALID WITHOUT SURVEYOR'S SIGNATURE AND EMBOSSED SEAL BY :MEF______ DATE :_02/03/2022 NOT A CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, EASEMENTS OR FREEDOM OF ENCUMBRANCES. FLORIDA STATUTE 5J-17.05 (3) (c): TWO SITE BENCHMARKS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTE: PROPERTY OWNER SHOULD OBTAIN WRITTEN FLOOD ZONE DETERMINATION FROM LOCAL PERMITTING, NOTE: IF APPLICABLE, FENCES SHOWN MEANDER PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION PLANNING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION. ON OR OFF LINES. (APPROX. LOCATION ONLY) 3884 PROGRESS AVE., SUITE 104 NOTE: REVISIONS NAPLES, FL 34104 INCOMPLIANCE WITH F.A.C. 5J-17.052 F.L.A. SURVEYS CORP. 239-403-1600 FAX 403-8600 (2) (d) (4) (IF LOCATION OF EASEMENTS GARAGE 239-404-7129 239-580-2795 OR RIGHT-OF-WAY OF RECORD, OTHER 10/03/2023 PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS &MAPPERS -LB 6569 239-250-2792 THAN THOSE ON RECORD PLAT, IS REQUIRED, THIS INFORMATION MUST BE PROJECT NO: 9220 BONITA BEACH ROAD, STE 200 FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR AND DRAWN BY: SVJ PARTY CHIEF: I AD BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 MAPPER. 22-100 - P PAGE 2 OF 3 NOT FOR FENCE CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR DESIGN PHOTO PAGE 3884 PROGRESS AVE., SUITE 104 F.L.A. SURVEYS CORP. NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS & MAPPERS - LB 6569 239-403-1600 FAX 403-8600 9220 BONITA BEACH ROAD, STE. 200 BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34135 239-403-1600 FAX403-8600 PROJECT NO. 22-10016 DRAWN BY: LFD IPARTY CHIEF: N/A Page 362 of 403 PAGE 3 OF 3 75. PBIDDE = PELICAN BAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DRAINAGE EASEMENT NOT VALID WITHOUT PAGES 1 76. PC =POINT OF CURVATURE AND 2 OF 3 77. PCC POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE GENERAL NOTES 78. PCP = PERMANENT CONTROL POINT Pc =PAGE ABSTRACT NOT REVIEWED 8. 0. PI =POINT OF INTERSECTION 81. PK = PARKER KALON NAIL N = NORTH 82. PLS = PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR S = SOUTH 83. POB = POINT OF BEGINNING E = EAST 84. POC = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT W = WEST, OR ANY COMBINATIONTHEREOF 85. PP = POWER POLE 1. ^= DEGREES 86. PRC = POINT OF REVERSE CURVE 2. ' = MINUTES WHEN USED IN A BEARING 87. PRM = PERMANENT REFERENCE 3. " = SECONDS WHEN USED IN A BEARING MONUMENT 4. ` = FEET WHEN USED IN A DISTANCE 88. PSM= PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER 5. " = INCHES WHEN USED IN A DISTANCE 89. P.0 & DE = PUBLIC UTILITY & DRAINAGE 6. ± _ "MORE OR LESS" OR "PLUS OR MINUS" EASEMENT 7. A = ARC DISTANCE 90. PUE = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 8. AC = ACRES 91. PT = POINT OF TANGENCY 9. A/C = AIR CONDITIONING PAD 92. PVS = PAVERS 10. A.E = ACCESS EASEMENT 93. Q.W.P.E. = QUAIL WEST PERPETUAL EASEMENT 10 A. ADJ= ADJUSTED 94. (R) = RADIAL 11. AF = ALUMINUM FENCE 95. R = RADIUS 12. AMUE = AVE MARIA UTILITY EASEMENT 96. RING = ITEM DETECTED BY METAL DETECTOR BUT 12A. APPROX. = APPROXIMATE NOT RECOVERED 12B. AVE = AVENUE 97. RNG= RANGE 13. B.E. = BUFFER EASEMENT 98. ROW = RIGHT-OF-WAY 14. BM = BENCHMARK 99. RR SPK = RAILROAD SPIKE 15. BOB = BASIS OF BEARING 100. SAT= SATELLITE DISH 16. BRG = BEARING 101. S.D.E = STREET DRAINAGE EASEMENT 17. C# = CURVE NUMBER 102. SEC = SECTION 18. C = CALCULATED 103. SDH = SET DRILL HOLE, NO ID 19. CB = CATCH BASIN 104. SIR = SET 5/8" IRON ROD WITH LB 20. CHB = CHORD BEARING NUMBER OF CORPORATION 21. CHD = CHORD 105. SPK&D = SET PK WITH DISC WITH LB NUMBER 22. CLF = CHAINLINK FENCE 106. IBM TEMPORARY BENCH MARK 23. CM = CONCRETE MONUMENT 107. TEL = TELEPHONE FACILITIES 24. CO = CLEAN OUT 108. TOB = TOP OF BANK 25. COL = COLUMN 109. TP = TRANSMITTER PAD 26. CONC = CONCRETE 110. TWP= TOWNSHIP 27. CPP = CONCRETE POWER POLE 111. U.E = UTILITY EASEMENT 28. CSW = CONCRETE SIDEWALK 112. VF = VINYL FENCE 29. CTV= CABLE TV RISER 113. VLV = VALVE 30. C.U.E= COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY 114. W = WATER SERVICE EASEMENT 115.WIT = WITNESS 31. D = DEED 115. WB = WATER BOX 32. D.E= DRAINAGE EASEMENT 116. WF= WOOD FENCE 33. DH = DRILL HOLE 117. WPP= WOOD POWER POLE 34. DI = DROP INLET 118. = DELTA OR CENTRAL ANGLE OF CURVE 35. ELEC= ELECTRIC 119. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND IN 36. EOP = EDGE OF PAVEMENT DECIMALS THEREOF 37. FOR = EDGE OF ROAD 120. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE N.A.V.D. UNLESS 38. EOW = EDGE OF WATER OTHERWISE STATED 39. F= AS LABELED OR FOUND IN THE FIELD 121. ALL PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN WITHOUT 40. F.A.C. = FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE DIMENSIONS ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES 41. FCC = FOUND CROSS CUT ONLY. THAT THEY DO EXIST, BUT WERE NOT 42. FCM = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT NECESSARILY MEASURED IN THE FIELD. 43. FEMA = FEDERAL EMERGENCY 122. NOTE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS FROM LATEST DEED MANAGEMENT AGENCY OF RECORD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 44. FDH = FOUND DRILL HOLE 123. EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAYS SHOWN ARE PER 45. FIE = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION RECORDED PLAT OR AS FURNISHED BY THE CLIENT 46. FH = FIRE HYDRANT 124. FOUNDATION LINE BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE 47. FIP = FOUND IRON PIPE GROUND IS NOT REFLECTED 48. FIR = FOUND IRON ROD 125. THIS SURVEY IS NOT TO BE USED FOR 49. FN = FOUND NAIL CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES UNDER ANY 50. FND = FOUND CONDITION UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED 51. FN&D = FOUND NAIL & DISC 126. NO UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR 52. FPK = FOUND PK NAIL IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT 53. FPK&D = FOUND PK NAIL AND DISC AS NOTED 53. G = GEODETIC 127. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING 54.GPS = GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAYS, AND/OR OWNERSHIP 54. GCE = GOLF COURSE EASEMENT WERE FURNISHED THIS SURVEYOR EXCEPT AS 55. HCP = HANDICAP PARKING SHOWN 56. IE = IRRIGATION EASEMENT 128. THERE ARE NO VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS EXCEPT 57.ELLEG = ILLEGIBLE THOSE AS DELINEATED ON THIS PLAT OF SURVEY 129. 57. LB = LICENSED BUSINESS TIES ARE TO FIELD LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 58. LBE = LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT 130. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS AND/OR 59. LE = LANDSCAPE EASEMENT EASEMENTS THAT ARE NOT RECORDED ON SAID 60. L.M.E = LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT PLAT THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC 61. LP = LIGHT POLE RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY 62. M = MEASURED 131. FENCES MEANDER ON AND OFF LINE, APPROXIMATE 63. ME = MAINTENANCE EASEMENT LOCATION ONLY UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. 132. THE 64. MH = MANHOLE LINES ON THIS SKETCH DO NOT CONSTITUTE 65. N.A.V.D. = NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL OWNERSHIP DATUM 133. THE INTENT OF THIS SURVEY IS FOR TITLE 65.A NAVD = NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL TRANSFER ONLY UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE 134. DATUM FLORIDA STATUTE 61G17-6.004: TWO SITE BENCHMARKS 66. N.G.V.D. = NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL ARE REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION. 135. THIS SURVEY DATUM DOES NOT REFLECT OR DETERMINE OWNERSHIP. 67. NO ID = NO IDENTIFYING MARKINGS 121. F.E.M.A. FLOOD HAZARD MAPPING: THIS DATE 68. (NR) = NON -RADIAL PRODUCT WAS NOT DESIGNED TO MAKE PRECISE 69. NTS= NOT TO SCALE IN/OUT FLOOD RISK DETERMINATIONS. THIS 70.OHP= OVERHEAD POWER PRODUCT IS NOT SUITABLE FOR 71.OHU = OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS AND CANNOT 72.O.R. = OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK BE USED TO 73. OIS = OFFSET DETERMINE ABSOLUTE DELINEATIONS OF FLOOD 74. P = PLAT Page 363 of 403 BOUNDARIES. CALL 1-877-FEMAMAP OR EMAIL A MAP SPECIALIST AT W W W.FEMA.ORG/MITff SD/F, 137. PROPERTY OWNER SHOULD OBTAIN WRITTEN FLOOD ZONE DETERMINATION FROM LOCAL PERMITTING, PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION PLANNING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION 138. IN COMPLIANCE WITH F.A.C. 61G17-6.0031 (4) (E) - IF LOCATION OF EASEMENTS OR RIGHT-OF-WAY OF RECORD, OTHER THAN THOSE ON RECORD PLAT,IS REQUIRED, THIS INFORMATION MUST BE FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 139. IF APPLICABLE, FENCES SHOWN MEANDER ON OR OFF LINES (APPROXIMATE LOCATION ONLY) 140. ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES, SUCH AS FURRING STRIPS, SIDING, CORNICES, STUCCO, ETC., OUTSIDE THE LINE OF THE STRUCTURE HAVE BEEN TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHEN GIVING TIES FROM THE STRUCTURE TO THE LOT LINES. 141. ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO THE FACT THAT THIS SURVEY MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED OR ENLARGED IN SIZE DUE TO REPRODUCTION. THIS SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN OBTAINING SCALED DATA. Page 364 of 403 CA gorimet Report Title Code Case Details 5/23/2025 5:38:35 PM Case Number CESD20210012586 M Case Number: CESD20210012586 Case Type: Site Development Priority: Normal Inspector: BrianOwen Status: Open Date & Time Entered: 12/8/2021 8:56:21 AM Entered By: Rickey.Migal Case Disposition: I Case Pending Jurisdiction: Collier County Code Enforcement Origin: Complaint Detail Description: Unpermitted structures, pump house and garage on estates property. Location Comment: 13620 White Blvd Address 3620 White BLVD, Naples Property 37987840000 Contacts 1111 diiiiiiiii Property Own KOGOK JR, WILLIAM N Business Management & Budget Office 1 Page 365 of 403 Code Case Details Execution Date 5/23/2025 5:38:35 PM Desc Assigned Required Completed Outcome Comments Verify Complainant BrianOwen 12/8/2021 12/8/2021 Verified CE Staff Review Rickey.Migal 12/8/2021 12/8/2021 Complete Complainant: Fortino Mendez, 3610 White Blvd (239-300-8899) CE Case Research Rickey.Migal 12/8/2021 12/8/2021 Complete No related cases Initial Inspection Rickey.Migal 12/8/2021 12/8/2021 Incomplete MigalRickey 12/08/2021 1:10 PM -while responding to a complaint against the property owner Fortino Mendez at 3610 White Blvd, he pointed out that the pump house and garage in the rear of the property were not permitted. Upon review, I found no permits for either structure. They were built in 2010 at the same time that the inground pool was installed (which was permitted). Will submit for determination. Attach Picture(s) Rickey.Migal 12/8/2021 12/8/2021 Complete Initial Inspection Follow-up Rickey.Migal 12/10/2021 12/10/2021 Violation(s) MigalRickey 12/10/2021 11:07 AM - received Found determination from chief building inspector Jon Walsh stating that the garage and pump house need to be permitted separately. He noted that the zoning setbacks may be an issue. Generate Notice of Violation Rickey.Migal 12/13/2021 12/13/2021 Complete Personal Service Attempt Rickey.Migal 12/13/2021 12/13/2021 Complete Record Violations Rickey.Migal 12/13/2021 12/13/2021 Complete Attach Picture(s) Rickey.Migal 12/13/2021 12/13/2021 Complete CE Phone Call Rickey.Migal 1/12/2022 1/12/2022 Complete MigalRickey 01/12/2022 9:35 AM - spoke to property owner Bill Kogok (202-790-2161) to get an update on this case. He has hired AUC Consultant, LLC to help him with the permitting process, and had a meeting with Renald Paul to determine the steps and costs associated with the permits. He is currently working on hiring an engineer and a survey company. to provide the necessary documents to the County. Re -Inspection Rickey.Migal 1/28/2022 1/27/2022 Non- MigalRickey 01/27/2022 2:11 PM - no permits Compliant applied for to this date. Left voicemail message for property owner Bill Kogok (202- 790-2161) asking for an update. If no progress is noted by 2/4/22, will prep for hearing. CE Phone Call Rickey.Migal 2/7/2022 2/7/2022 Complete MigalRickey 02/07/2022 10:57 AM - left voicemail message for property owner Bill Kogok (202-790-2161) to get an update on obtaining the necessary permits for this case. Business Management & Budget Office 2 Page 366 of 403 Code Case Details Execution Date 5/23/2025 5:38:35 PM Desc Assigned Required Completed Outcome Comments Re -Inspection Rickey.Migal 2/9/2022 2/10/2022 Requires MigalRickey 02/10/2022 9:52 AM - no permits Hearing have been applied for. Respondent has not responded to two voicemail messages requesting an update on his case. Notified him in today's voicemail message that I will prep his case for hearing. CE Phone Call Rickey.Migal 2/10/2022 2/10/2022 Complete MigalRickey 02/10/2022 9:51 AM - left voicemail message for property owner Bill Kogok asking for an update on his case. Assign Hearing Type Rickey.Migal 2/10/2022 2/10/2022 Code Enforcemen t Board Hearing CE Supervisor Review (CE) perezcristina 2/10/2022 2/23/2022 Rejected Packet emailed to CP79 on 2/10/22 2/23/22 No proof of service, NOV needs to be scanned. CP79. CE Staff Review Rickey.Migal 2/25/2022 2/25/2022 Complete Rick, please have the notice of violation scanned into the case as proof of service. CP79. Generate Notice of Violation Rickey.Migal 2/25/2022 2/25/2022 Complete CE Staff Review perezcristina 2/28/2022 2/28/2022 Complete NOV proof of serivice. CP79 CE Mailing KimberlyBran 2/28/2022 3/1/2022 Complete Please mail NOV both regular and certified. des NOV Reg/Cert./KB Owner: (NOV) Notice Of Violation mailed Regular/Certified# 7021 950 0000 6364 9428./KB CESD20210012586 NOV RM-66 KOGOK JR, WILLIAM N 3620 WHITE BLVD NAPLES, FL 34117 Post Courthouse Rickey.Migal 2/28/2022 2/28/2022 Complete Post Property Rickey.Migal 2/28/2022 2/28/2022 Complete Update Picture(s) Rickey.Migal 2/28/2022 2/28/2022 Complete Affidavit of Service/Posting Rickey.Migal 2/28/2022 2/28/2022 Complete Personal Service Attempt Rickey.Migal 2/28/2022 2/28/2022 Incomplete CE Staff Review KimberlyBran 3/1/2022 3/1/2022 Complete NOV Scanned & Attached./KB des CESD20210012586 3-1-2022 NOV RM- 66. pdf CE Staff Review KimberlyBran 3/1/2022 3/1/2022 Complete AOM Scanned & Attached./KB des CESD20210012586 3-1-2022 AOM.pdf CE Staff Review KimberlyBran 3/1/2022 3/1/2022 Complete AOP Scanned & Attached./KB des CESD20210012586 2-28-2022 AOP.pdf Generate Notice of Violation Rickey.Migal 3/11/2022 3/11/2022 Complete CE Staff Review Rickey.Migal 3/11/2022 3/11/2022 Complete Affidavit of Service/Posting Rickey.Migal 3/14/2022 3/14/2022 Complete Personal Service Attempt Rickey.Migal 3/14/2022 3/14/2022 Incomplete Business Management & Budget Office 3 Page 367 of 403 Code Case Details Execution Date 5/23/2025 5:38:35 PM Desc Assigned Required Completed Outcome Comments CE Mailing KimberlyBran 3/14/2022 3/14/2022 Complete Please mail regular and certified des NOV Reg/Cert./KB Owner: (NOV) Notice Of Violation Mailed Reg u lar/Certified#7022 0410 0003 3961 4125 CESD20210012586 NOV RM-66 KOGOK JR, WILLIAM N 3620 WHITE BLVD NAPLES, FL 34117 Post Courthouse Rickey.Migal 3/14/2022 3/14/2022 Complete Post Property Rickey.Migal 3/14/2022 3/14/2022 Complete CE Staff Review Rickey.Migal 3/14/2022 3/14/2022 Complete CE Staff Review KimberlyBran 3/14/2022 3/14/2022 Complete NOV Scanned & Attached./KB des CESD20210012586 3-14-2022 NOV RM- 66. pdf CE Staff Review KimberlyBran 3/14/2022 3/14/2022 Complete AOP Scanned & Attached./KB des CESD20210012586 3-11-2022 AOP.pdf CE Staff Review KimberlyBran 3/14/2022 3/15/2022 Complete AOM Scanned & Attached./KB des CESD20210012586 3-14-2022 AOM CE Staff Review Donna.Gentsc 3/30/2022 3/30/2022 Complete Green card NOV received 3/18/22 7022 0410 h 0003 3961 4125 dg Re -Inspection Rickey.Migal 4/13/2022 4/13/2022 Non- MigalRickey 04/13/2022 10:41 AM - property Compliant owner has received the necessary survey and elevation from the surveyor and is working on hiring an engineer. He is working towards being able to apply for the permits for the pump house and the garage. Will continue to monitor. CE Phone Call Rickey.Migal 4/13/2022 4/13/2022 Complete MigalRickey 04/13/2022 10:36 AM - spoke to property owner Bill Kogok (202-790-2161). He has successfully procured the elevation from the surveyor, and is in the process of choosing an engineer to begin working on the permitting process. CE Phone Call Rickey.Migal 5/16/2022 5/16/2022 Complete MigalRickey 05/16/2022 2:27 PM - spoke to property owner Bill Kogok (202-790-2161) and he is having no success finding an engineer who will take his job and draw up engineering plans ATF for the garage and pump house. Will meet with him on 5/17/22 to discuss options. Re -Inspection Rickey.Migal 5/19/2022 5/19/2022 Non- MigalRickey 05/19/2022 11:28 AM - met with Compliant property owner Bill Kogok. His survey is complete, but he cannot find an engineer who will take his case. He is going to expand beyond Naples and call engineers throughout SWFL. Will schedule for hearing if no engineer hired by 6/1/22. CE Phone Call Rickey.Migal 7/20/2022 7/20/2022 Complete MigalRickey 07/20/2022 3:23 PM - at 9:15 AM, left voicemail message and sent an email to Claudine Auclair for AUC Consultant, LLC (239-595-2394) asking for a return call to discuss this case. No response as of this time. Business Management & Budget Office 4 Page 368 of 403 Code Case Details Execution Date 5/23/2025 5:38:35 PM Desc Assigned Required Completed Outcome Comments Re -Inspection Rickey.Migal 7/27/2022 7/27/2022 Requires MigalRickey 07/27/2022 9:27 AM - no Hearing additional progress, beyond a new survey, has been made towards obtaining permits for the detached garage and pump house. Property owner has called several engineers and has been negotiating with AUC Consultants for permit help, but as of this date nothing has been finalized. Prep for hearing. Assign Hearing Type Rickey.Migal 7/27/2022 7/27/2022 Code Enforcemen t Board Hearing CE Supervisor Review (CE) BradleyHolme 8/1/2022 8/12/2022 Rejected s CE Staff Review Rickey.Migal 8/15/2022 8/15/2022 Complete MigalRickey 08/15/2022 8:19 AM - SOV revised to reflect most recent NOV CE Supervisor Review (CE) BradleyHolme 8/16/2022 8/16/2022 Complete s CE Legal Review Ietourneau j. 8/17/2022 8/17/2022 Schedule I reviewed the packet and gave it to the for SM/CEB Hearing Team. JL#34 Generate Hearing Notice (CE) HelenBuchillo 8/23/2022 8/23/2022 Complete n Schedule Case for Hearing helenbuchillon 8/24/2022 8/23/2022 Complete Case scheduled for the September 22, 2022 CEB Hearing — HB Affidavit of Service/Posting Rickey.Migal 8/29/2022 8/29/2022 Complete Hearing Notice Service/Posting Rickey.Migal 8/29/2022 8/29/2022 Complete CE Mailing HelenBuchillo 8/30/2022 8/30/2022 Complete NOH for the September 22, 2022 CEB n Hearing sent regular mail, evidence packet sent certified — HB CE Phone Call BradleyHolme 9/7/2022 9/7/2022 Complete Phone call attempted on 9.6.2022 - call went s to voicemail - message left with call back number. Phone call attempted on 9.7.2022 - call went to voicemail - message left with call back number. BH91 CE Staff Review HelenBuchillo 9/15/2022 9/15/2022 Complete Scanned & attached notarized AOM AOP— n HB CE Staff Review Donna.Gentsc 9/19/2022 9/19/2022 Complete Attached CESD20210012586 Violation h Determination Checklist dg Pre Hearing Inspection Rickey.Migal 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 Complete MigalRickey 09/21/2022 11:29 AM - site visit - observed that no changes have been made to the pump house. The detached garage was not visible from my legal vantage point. Took pictures. Violation remains. Business Management & Budget Office 5 Page 369 of 403 Code Case Details Execution Date 5/23/2025 5:38:35 PM Desc Assigned Required Completed Outcome Comments Record Hearing Results HelenBuchillo 9/27/2022 9/23/2022 Complete 9/22/22 Respondent was present. Code n Enforcement Board found the respondent in violation and ordered to abate all violations by: Obtaining all required Collier County Building Permit(s), or Demolition Permit, Inspections, and Certificate of Completion/Occupancy for the pump house and garage on or before April 22, 2023 or a fine of $250.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter and pay operational costs for the prosecution of this case in the amount of $59.28 on or before October 22, 2022. — HB CE Mailing HelenBuchillo 10/10/2022 10/10/2022 Complete Mailed copy of FF Order (not recorded) to n respondent from the September 22, 2022 CEB Hearing — HB Generate Hearing Results Notice HelenBuchillo 10/24/2022 10/24/2022 Complete Findings of Fact Order attached, OR 6181 PG (CE) n 452 — HB 10/10/22 Scanned & attached FF Order (not recorded) from the September 22, 2022 CEB Hearing and sent Order to be recorded - HB Post Hearing Re -Inspection Charles.Marin 4/23/2023 4/24/2023 Non- No permits on file at this time. No answer os Compliant from Mr Kogok when contact attempt made. Preparing Affidavit of non-compliance. MarinosCharles 04/24/2023 2:36 PM CE Staff Review Charles.Marin 4/24/2023 4/24/2023 Complete Duplicate entry. CM88 os CE Staff Review Charles.Marin 4/24/2023 4/24/2023 Complete Duplicate entry. CM88 os CE Staff Review IlianaBurgos 5/9/2023 5/9/2023 Complete Potential buyer came to GMD to get information about the case. We provided the detailed case report, copy of the Finding of Fact order, and Inv. Marinos' and Renald Paul's business cards. I advised her that the fines had not been imposed at a hearing as of date; however, the ordered compliance date was exceeded and the case could be scheduled for an imposition of fine/lien soon. also let her know that $250/day fine accrues until the violations are confirmed abated by the investigator. - IB CE Phone Call BradleyHolme 5/10/2023 5/10/2023 Complete 5-10-2023 Phone call with the property owner. s Discussed case and CEB order. Owner will be emailing a request for an appearance in front of the code enforcement board. BH91 CE Staff Review HelenBuchillo 5/12/2023 5/12/2023 Complete Scanned & attached notarized AONC — HB n Schedule Case for Hearing Miriam.Lorenz 6/6/2023 6/6/2023 Complete Case has been scheduled for June 22, 2023 o CEB Hearing Generate Hearing Notice (CE) Miriam.Lorenz 6/6/2023 6/6/2023 Complete 0 Hearing Notice Service/Posting Charles.Marin 6/6/2023 6/6/2023 Complete Last day to post June 8, 2023./ML os Property posted on 06Jun2023 at 1207. CM88 CE Mailing Karina.Lopez 6/6/2023 6/6/2023 1 Complete I NOH for June 22, 2023 CEB Hearing Mail Regular. Evidence Pckg mail certf. KL Business Management & Budget Office 6 Page 370 of 403 Code Case Details Execution Date 5/23/2025 5:38:35 PM Desc Assigned Required Completed Outcome Comments Affidavit of Service/Posting Charles.Marin 6/6/2023 6/6/2023 Complete os Re -Inspection Charles.Marin 6/7/2023 6/6/2023 Non- Research shows no new permit activity at this os Compliant time. Violation remains, fines continue to accrue. CM88 CE Staff Review Karina.Lopez 6/7/2023 6/7/2023 Complete Please scan and notorize signed AOP. CM88 CE Legal Review helenbuchillon 6/10/2023 6/6/2023 Schedule On list to check if need to schedule for next for SM/CEB CEB IOF, (not abated by date ordered).— HB Pre Hearing Inspection Charles.Marin 6/21/2023 6/23/2023 Complete Permit check shows no new permits on file at os this time. CM88 Record Hearing Results helenbuchillon 6/23/2023 6/23/2023 Complete 6/22/23 Respondent was present and requested a continuance. Code Enforcement Board granted a continuance for 60 days (August 21, 2023). Fines continue to accrue — HB CE Staff Review HelenBuchillo 6/23/2023 6/23/2023 Complete CORRECT NOTES FOR RECORD HEARING n RESULTS 6/23/23: 6/22/23 Respondent was present and requested a continuance. Code Enforcement Board granted a continuance for 60 days (August 21, 2023), and ordered Respondent to pay $59.28 ops costs for todays IOF Hearing on or before July 22, 2023. Fines continue to accrue — HB CE Mailing Karina.Lopez 7/3/2023 7/3/2023 Complete Mailed (not recorded) order to respondent. KL Generate Hearing Results Notice HelenBuchillo 7/20/2023 7/11/2023 Complete Scanned & attached Granted Continuance (CE) n Order (not recorded) from the June 22, 2023 CEB IOF Hearing. - HB Schedule Case for Hearing Miriam.Lorenz 8/3/2023 8/3/2023 Complete Case scheduled for August 24 , 2023 CEB o Hearing./ML Generate Hearing Notice (CE) Miriam.Lorenz 8/3/2023 8/3/2023 Complete 0 CE Mailing Miriam.Lorenz 8/3/2023 8/3/2023 Complete NOH for the August 24, 2023 CEB Hearing o mailed reg. and evidence packet mailed cert./ML Hearing Notice Service/Posting Charles.Marin 8/7/2023 8/7/2023 Complete Last day to post August 10, 2023./ML os Property posted on 07Aug2023 at 0942. CM88 Affidavit of Service/Posting Charles.Marin 8/7/2023 8/7/2023 Complete CIS Re -Inspection Charles.Marin 8/22/2023 8/29/2023 Non- Received email from owner Bill Kogok, os Compliant building remains. Mr Kogok is working with Claudine from AUC Consultants to obtain required permitting. Will continue to monitor. CM88 Post Hearing Re -Inspection Charles.Marin 8/22/2023 8/29/2023 Non- Received email from owner Bill Kogok, os Compliant building remains. Mr Kogok is working with Claudine from AUC Consultants to obtain required permitting. Will continue to monitor. CM88 CE Legal Review helenbuchillon 8/22/2023 8/3/2023 Schedule 6/22/23 Check if abated by the continuance for SM/CEB date ordered, if not revise on list to check if need to schedule for next CEB IOF — HB Business Management & Budget Office 7 Page 371 of 403 Code Case Details Execution Date 5/23/2025 5:38:35 PM Desc Assigned Required Completed Outcome Comments Not Applicable HelenBuchillo 8/23/2023 8/10/2023 Not n Required CE Staff Review HelenBuchillo 8/25/2023 8/10/2023 Complete Case has been withdrawn it was scheduled in n error, we tried contacting Mr. Kogok a few times and left voicemail explaining the mistake. - HB Update Picture(s) Charles.Marin 8/29/2023 8/29/2023 Complete os CE Staff Review Charles.Marin 8/29/2023 8/29/2023 Complete Duplicate entry. CM88 os CE Staff Review Charles.Marin 8/29/2023 8/29/2023 Complete Duplicate entry. CM88 os Schedule Case for Hearing HelenBuchillo 8/31/2023 8/31/2023 Complete Case scheduled for the September 28, 2023 n CEB IOF Hearing — HB Generate Hearing Notice (CE) HelenBuchillo 8/31/2023 8/31/2023 Complete n CE Legal Review helenbuchillon 8/31/2023 8/31/2023 Schedule On list to check if need to schedule for next for SM/CEB CEB IOF.— HB CE Mailing HelenBuchillo 9/5/2023 9/5/2023 Complete NOH for the September 28, 2023 CEB IOF n Hearing sent regular mail, evidence packet sent certified — HB Hearing Notice Service/Posting Charles.Marin 9/8/2023 9/8/2023 Not Last day to post is September 14, 2023 — HB os Required Pulled from agenda. MarinosCharles 09/08/2023 8:50 AM Not Applicable HelenBuchillo 9/27/2023 9/8/2023 Not n Required CE Staff Review HelenBuchillo 10/1/2023 9/8/2023 Complete 9/8/23 Case has been withdrawn from the n September 28, 2023 CEB IOF Hearing per Supervisor Bradley Holmes — HB (Compliance Efforts) Schedule Case for Hearing Miriam.Lorenz 10/5/2023 10/5/2023 Complete Case scheduled for October 26 , 2023 CEB 0 Hearing./ML Generate Hearing Notice (CE) Miriam.Lorenz 10/5/2023 10/5/2023 Complete 0 CE Staff Review Charles.Marin 10/5/2023 10/6/2023 Complete 0s CE Legal Review helenbuchillon 10/5/2023 10/5/2023 Schedule On list to check if need to schedule for next for SM/CEB CEB IOF.— HB Re -Inspection Charles.Marin 10/19/2023 10/19/2023 Non- Permit PRGR20230834092 for detached os Compliant garage is now in "Rejected" status, applied for on 14Aug2023. Corrections letter generated on 15September2023. Will continue to monitor. Violation remains, fines continue to accrue. MarinosCharles 10/19/2023 10:49 AM CE Staff Review Charles.Marin 10/25/2023 10/25/2023 Complete Duplicate entry. CM88 os Schedule Case for Hearing HelenBuchillo 10/26/2023 10/26/2023 Complete Case scheduled for the November 17, 2023 n CEB IOF Hearing — HB Generate Hearing Notice (CE) HelenBuchillo 10/26/2023 10/26/2023 Complete n Business Management & Budget Office 8 Page 372 of 403 Code Case Details Execution Date 5/23/2025 5:38:35 PM Desc Assigned Required Completed Outcome Comments Hearing Notice Service/Posting Charles.Marin 10/27/2023 10/27/2023 Complete Last day to post is November 2, 2023 — HB os Property posted on 270ct2023 at 1125. CM88 CE Mailing HelenBuchillo 10/27/2023 10/27/2023 Complete NOH for the November 17, 2023 CEB IOF n Hearing sent regular mail, evidence packet sent certified — HB Affidavit of Service/Posting Charles.Marin 10/27/2023 10/27/2023 Complete os CE Staff Review helenbuchillon 10/27/2023 11/8/2023 Complete 11/8/23 Scanned & attached notarized IOF AOM AOP— HB Please scan and notorize signed AOP. CW8 CE Staff Review Miriam.Lorenz 10/30/2023 10/5/2023 Complete Case has been withdrawn from the CEB o October 26, 2023 Hearing, will be rescheduled at a later date, per Supervisor Bradley Holmes./ML CE Staff Review Charles.Marin 11/2/2023 11/1/2023 Complete Duplicate entry. CM88 os Pre Hearing Inspection Charles.Marin 11/16/2023 11/16/2023 Complete Permit PRGR20230834092 remains in os rejected status. Violating structure remains. CM88 Record Hearing Results HelenBuchillo 11/20/2023 11/21/2023 Complete 11/17/23 Respondent was present and n requested a continuance. Code Enforcement Board granted a continuance for 6 months (May 17, 2024), and ordered Respondent to pay $59.56 ops costs for today's IOF Hearing on or before December 17, 2023. Fines continue to accrue — HB CE Mailing HelenBuchillo 11/30/2023 12/5/2023 Complete Mailed copy of Continuance IOF Order (not n recorded) to respondent from the November 17, 2023 CEB IOF Hearing — HB Generate Hearing Results Notice HelenBuchillo 11/30/2023 12/5/2023 Complete 11/30/23 Scanned & attached Continuance (CE) n IOF Order (not recorded) from the November 17, 2023 CEB IOF Hearing — HB Post Hearing Re -Inspection BradleyHolme 5/18/2024 5/20/2024 Non- 5-20-2024 Permit check completed. Permit s Compliant #PRGR20230834092 - exp. 9/7/2024 - status: Issued. Violation remains - fines continue to accrue. BH91 Not Applicable BradleyHolme 5/20/2024 5/20/2024 Not s Required Not Applicable BradleyHolme 5/20/2024 5/20/2024 Not s Required Re -Inspection BradleyHolme 6/20/2024 6/21/2024 Non- 6-21-2024 Permit check completed. Permit s Compliant #PRGR20230834092 - exp. 9/7/2024 - status: Issued. Violation remains - fines continue to accrue. BH91 Re -Inspection BradleyHolme 7/24/2024 7/24/2024 Non- Permit check completed. Permit s Compliant #PRGR20230834092 - exp. 9/7/2024 - status: Issued. Violation remains - fines continue to accrue. BH91 Not Applicable BradleyHolme is 7/24/2024 7/24/2024 Not Required Business Management & Budget Office 9 Page 373 of 403 Code Case Details Execution Date 5/23/2025 5:38:35 PM Desc Assigned Required Completed Outcome Comments Schedule Case for Hearing HelenBuchillo 8/27/2024 8/27/2024 Complete Case scheduled for the September 26, 2024, n CEB IOF Hearing — HB Generate Hearing Notice (CE) HelenBuchillo 8/27/2024 8/27/2024 Complete n Re -Inspection BradleyHolme 8/28/2024 8/28/2024 Non- 8-28-2024 Permit check completed. Permit s Compliant #PRGR20230834092 - exp. 2/24/2025 - status: Inspections Commenced. No permit on file to keep or demolish the pump house. Violation remains - fines continue to accrue. BH91 CE Mailing HelenBuchillo 8/29/2024 8/29/2024 Complete NOH for the September 26, 2024, CEB IOF n Hearing sent regular mail, evidence packet sent certified — HB CE Legal Review helenbuchillon 8/31/2024 8/27/2024 Schedule 5/21/24 Still, on list to check if need to for SM/CEB schedule for next CEB IOF — HB 11/17/23 Check if abated by the continuance date ordered, if not put on list to check if need to schedule for next CEB IOF — HB Hearing Notice Service/Posting BradleyHolme 9/10/2024 9/10/2024 Complete Last day to post is September 12, 2024 — HB s 9-10-2024 NOH for IOF posted on the property at 0919hrs and at the courthouse. Photos taken. BH91 Update Picture(s) BradleyHolme 9/11/2024 9/11/2024 Complete s Affidavit of Service/Posting BradleyHolme 9/11/2024 9/11/2024 Complete s CE Staff Review HelenBuchillo 9/18/2024 9/18/2024 Complete Scanned & attached notarized IOF AOM AOP n —HB Not Applicable HelenBuchillo 9/25/2024 9/25/2024 Not n Required CE Legal Review helenbuchillon 9/30/2024 10/3/2024 Schedule 9/25/24 Still, On list to check if need to for SM/CEB schedule for next CEB IOF — HB CE Staff Review HelenBuchillo 9/30/2024 9/25/2024 Complete 9/25/24 Case has been withdrawn from the n September 26, 2024, CEB IOF Hearing and will be re -scheduled for another CEB IOF Hearing per Manager Jeff Letourneau. — HB Schedule Case for Hearing Miriam.Lorenz 10/3/2024 10/3/2024 Complete Case scheduled for the October 24, 2024, 0 CEB Hearing. /ML Generate Hearing Notice (CE) Miriam.Lorenz 10/3/2024 10/3/2024 Complete 0 CE Mailing Miriam.Lorenz 10/3/2024 10/3/2024 Complete NOH for the October 24, 2024, CEB Hearing o sent regular and evidence packet sent certified. /ML Hearing Notice Service/Posting BradleyHolme 10/7/2024 10/7/2024 Complete Last day to post October 10, 2024./ML s 10-7-2024 NOH posted on the property at 0825hrs and at the Courthouse. Photos taken. BH91 Affidavit of Service/Posting BradleyHolme 10/7/2024 10/7/2024 Complete s CE Staff Review HelenBuchillo 10/21/2024 10/21/2024 Complete Scanned & attached notarized IOF AOM AOP n —HB Business Management & Budget Office 10 Page 374 of 403 Code Case Details Execution Date 5/23/2025 5:38:35 PM Desc Assigned Required Completed Outcome Comments Pre Hearing Inspection BradleyHolme 10/23/2024 10/23/2024 Complete 10-23-2024 Site inspection completed. I met s with the property owner who signed an entry consent form and granted me access to photograph the pump house. No permit is on file to address the structure. The property owner will be requesting additional time from the code enforcement board. BH91 CE Staff Review Adam.Farina 10/24/2024 10/24/2024 Complete I spoke with the property owner (William Kogok) who tried to pay his operational costs from today's hearing but was unable to do so because the hearing was still ongoing. He asked that I note his attempt in the case. \AF Record Hearing Results helenbuchillon 10/28/2024 10/28/2024 Complete 10/24/24 Respondent was present and requested a continuance. Code Enforcement Board granted a continuance for 6 months (April 24, 2025) and ordered Respondents to pay $59.63 ops costs for today's IOF Hearing on or before November 23, 2024 (30 days). Daily Fines to stop accruing as of today — HB CE Mailing HelenBuchillo 11/8/2024 11/12/2024 Complete Mailed copy of Continued IOF Order (not n recorded) to respondent from the October 24, 2024, CEB IOF Hearing — HB Generate Hearing Results Notice HelenBuchillo 11/30/2024 12/2/2024 Complete 12/2/24 Continued IOF Order attached, OR (CE) n 6417 PG 391 — HB 11/8/24 Scanned & attached Continued IOF Order (not recorded) from the October 24, 2024, CEB IOF Hearing and sent Order to be recorded - HB Not Applicable BrianOwen 4/23/2025 4/23/2025 Not Required Not Applicable BrianOwen 4/23/2025 4/23/2025 Not Required Post Hearing Re -Inspection BrianOwen 4/24/2025 4/23/2025 Non- Variance has been applied for under Compliant PL20240011254. Variance is currently under review for pump house. Monitoring continues. Fines resume. OwenBrian 04/23/2025 2:33 PM Re -Inspection BrianOwen 5/23/2025 5/22/2025 Non- Variance has been applied for under Compliant PL20240011254. Variance is currently under review for pump house. Monitoring continues. Fines resume. OwenBrian 05/22/2025 8:12 AM CE Legal Review helenbuchillon 5/31/2025 Pending 4/25/25 Not Abated, Still on list to check if need to schedule for next CEB IOF.— HB 10/24/24 Check if abated by the Continuance date ordered (4/24/25), if not REVISE on list to check if need to schedule for next CEB IOF. — HB Re -Inspection BrianOwen 6/24/2025 Pending Violation Violation Description Status Entered Corrected Amount Comments Improvement Prior to Building Permit NOV Issued 12/13/2021 $0 Business Management & Budget Office 11 Page 375 of 403 Code Case Details Execution Date 5/23/2025 5:38:35 PM Violation Description Status Entered Corrected Amount Comments Building Permit LDC NOV Issued 2/25/2022 $0 Unpermitted structures, pump house and garage on estates property. CO Required ATF Permits NOV Issued 2/25/2022 $0 Unpermitted structures, pump house and garage on estates property. Improvement Prior to Building Permit NOV Issued 2/25/2022 $0 Unpermitted structures, pump house and garage on estates property. Title Reason Result Compliance Fine/Day Condition Code Enforcement Board Hearing on Code Review Guilty $0 CEB Ops Costs - HB 09/22/2022 Code Enforcement Board Hearing on Imposition of Continued $0 CEB ops cost./ML 6/22/2023 Fines by Respondant Code Enforcement Board Hearing on Imposition of Withdrawn $0 CEB ops cost./ML 8/24/2023 Fines Code Enforcement Board Hearing on Imposition of Withdrawn $0 CEB IOF Ops Costs - HB 9/28/2023 Fines Code Enforcement Board Hearing on Imposition of Withdrawn $0 CEB ops cost./ML 10/26/2023 Fines Code Enforcement Board Hearing on Imposition of Continued $0 CEB IOF Ops Costs - HB 11/17/2023 Fines by Respondant Code Enforcement Board Hearing on Imposition of Withdrawn $0 CEB IOF Ops Costs - HB 9/26/2024 Fines Code Enforcement Board Hearing on Imposition of Continued $0 IOF CEB ops cost./ML 10/24/2024 Fines by Respondant Business Management & Budget Office 12 Page 376 of 403 4 6- Co 1'er County Growth Management Community Development Department Need Help? GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permittinq Guides VARIANCE PETITION APPLICATION Variance from Setbacks Required for a Particular Zoning District LDC section 9.04.00 & Code of Laws section 2-83 — 2-90 Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of PropertyOwner(s): William Kogok Jr Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 3620 White Blvd City: Naples Telephone: State: FL ZIP: 34117 Cell:202-790-2161 Fax: E-Mail Address: carriage—house@hotmail.com Name of Agent: Kira Orangio Firm: Phoenix Associates of Florida 13180 Livingston Rd. Ste 206 Address: 239-596-9111 x.219 Telephone: Cell: City: Naples State: FL Fax: E-Mail Address: korangio@phoenix-associates.com 34109 ZIP: BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. Variance Application (VA) 3/27/24 Planning and Zoning Division - 2800 North Horseshoe Drive - Naples, FL 34104 - 239-252-2400 www.colliercountvfl.gov Page 1 of 6 Page 377 of 403 PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) �I Property I.D. Number: 37987840000 Section/Township/Range: 1 `� /49 /26 Subdivision: Golden Gate Estates Unit: 27 Lot: Block: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 27 E 75FT OF W 150FT OF TR 84 Metes & Bounds Description: Total Acreage: 1.14 Address/ General Location of Subject 3620 White Blvd Property: On White Blvd, 1/2 mile east of Collier Blvd, house located on the right ADJALEN i cviviNG AND LAND var Zoning Land Use N Estates Single Family Residential S Estates Single Family Residential E Estates Single Family Residential W Estates Single Family Residential Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property: Front: 75 f.t. Corner Lot: ❑ Yes X❑ No Side: 7. f.t. Waterfront Lot: ❑ Yes ❑ No Rear:75 f.t. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. Variance Application (VA) 3/27/24 Page 2 of 6 Page 378 of 403 ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: City: State• ZIP: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: City: State: ZIP: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: NATURE OF PETITION On a separate sheet, attached to the application, please provide the following: 1. A detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25 ft. to 18 ft.; when property owner purchased property; when existing principal structure was built (include building permit number(s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc. 2. For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a-h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. Variance Application (VA) 3/27/24 Page 3 of 6 Page 379 of 403 b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. g) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? 4. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, please provide copies. Variance Application (VA) 3/27/24 Page 4 of 6 Page 380 of 403 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Variance Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) Pre -Application Meeting Notes Project Narrative Completed Addressing Checklist Property Ownership Disclosure Form Conceptual Site Plan 24" x 36" and one 8%" x 11" copy ❑ ❑ Survey of property showing the encroachment measured in feet Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized Deeds/Legal(s) Li Location map Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial ❑ ❑ Historical Survey or waiver request, if applicable El Environmental Data Requirements or exemption justification Once the first set of review comments are posted, provide the assigned planner with draft Agent Letter and address of property owners ❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. Variance Application (VA) 3/27/24 Page 5 of 6 Page 381 of 403 Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following reviewers: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Historical Review: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Parks and Recreation Director: Olema Edwards ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Other: ❑ FEE REQUIREMENTS ❑ Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 ❑ Variance Petition: o Residential- $2,000.00 o Non -Residential- $5,000.00 o Sth and Subsequent Review- 20% of original fee ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 ❑ After The Fact Zoning/Land Use Petitions: 2x the normal petition fee ❑ Listed Species Survey (if EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Applica t Signature Kira Orangio Printed Name Growth Management Community Development Department Zoning Division ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 09/25/24 Date Variance Application (VA) 3/27/24 Page 6 of 6 Page 382 of 403 Collier County Addressing Checklist GMCD Public Portal Land Development Code Administrative Code Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with a * are required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Applicant Contact Information *Name of Owner/Agent: William KOgok Firm [if agent]: *Address: 3620 White Blvd *City: Naples *State: FL *ZIP: 34117 *Telephone: (202) 790-2161 Cell: Fax: *E-Mail Address: Carriage_hOUse@hotmail.COm Location Information *Folio (Property ID) Number(s) of the subject property or properties [Attach list if necessary]: 37987840000 *Legal Description of subject property or properties [Attach list if necessary]: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 27 E 75FT OF W 150 FT OF TR 84 Street Address(es) where applicable, if already assigned: 3620 WHITE BLVD, NAPLES FL 34117 Addressing Checklist 6/14/2024 Page 1 of 2 Growth Management Community Development • Operations & Regulatory Management 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • www.colhercountyfl.gov/ Page 383 of 403 Collier County Project Information Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre -approval of project name and/or street name may be requested by contacting us at GMD Addressing(cDcolliercountvfl.gov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. Current Project Name: Proposed Project Name: Proposed Street Name: Latest Approved Project Number [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] Submittal Requirement Checklist Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include. Checkmark the items included with this application: Requirements for Review: Required: LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. ❑x List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. ❑ E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre -approved project and/or street names. ❑ The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMCD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountvfl.qov/citvviewweb Questions? Email: Front. Des k(a-)col I iercou ntyfl. gov Addressing Checklist 6/14/2024 Page 2 of 2 Growth Management Community Development • Operations & Regulatory Management 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • xx x� x� xollicrcountvfl.gov- / Page 384 of 403 PHOENIX ASSOCIATES OF FLORIDA, INC. CGC #034149 W W W. PHOENIX -AS SOCIATES. COM Design Build General Contractor February 26, 2025 Collier County Growth Management Department Development Review Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 To: Intake Planner From: Kira Orangio Re: Request for Variance PL20240011254 We would like to submit a Variance Request for a single-family residence setback requirement. We are requesting the required 7.5' side setback required for lots deemed non -conforming due to lot width, be reduced to 2.95' to allow for the continued existence of the pool equipment shed measuring 6.8'x12.2' with a roof over -hang of 1.25'. The offending structure was constructed before the current owner took possession of the property, no permits are known to have been obtained, and a building permit will be applied for and obtained as a condition of approval should the requested Variance be approved. Criteria: A) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved? This is a non -conforming lot with a lot width of 75' B) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is subject to the variance request. The encroaching accessory structure, a pool equipment shed, was constructed in 2010, prior to the purchase of the subject property in 2021 by the current owner. It has had no negative impact to the existing site. C) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardships on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant? Yes. It will be very difficult to move a structure that has existed for 14 years. This structure was already built prior to the purchase in 2021. It has had no negative impact to the existing site. We will be applying for a building permit for this structure as well. CORPORATE OFFICES 13180 LIVINGSTON ROAD - SUITE 204 - NAPLES, FLORIDA 34109 P 239.596.9111 F 239.596.2637 Page 385 of 403 PHOENIX ASSOCIATES OF FLORIDA, INC. CGC #034149 W W W. PHOENIX -AS SOCIATES. COM Design Build General Contractor D) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of land, buildings or structure and which promote standards of health, safety, or welfare? Yes E) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. Yes F) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Yes. This structure has existed for 14 years and has had no negative impact to the site or neighboring properties. G) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. No H) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? No -Does not apply If you have any questions or comments regarding this submittal, please contact me at (239) 596-9111 ext. 219 or by email korangiokphoenix-associates.com . Sincerely, A! " Ki Orangio CORPORATE OFFICES 13180 LIVINGSTON ROAD - SUITE 204 - NAPLES, FLORIDA 34109 P 239.596.9111 F 239.596.2637 Page 386 of 403 INSTR 6016702 OR 5906 PG 2997 E-RECORDED 3/11/2021 12:00 PM PAGES CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $3,150.00 REC $18.50 CONS $450,000.00 After Recording Return to: Allie Pelham Action Title Services 3733 Tamiami Trail North Naples, FL 34103 This Instrument Prepared by: Allie Pelham Action Title Services 3733 Tamiami Trail NQrtK Naples, FL 34103 as a necessary ircn't,-4 contained in a titig irisur e Property Appraisers 37987840000 File No.: 21030192 fulfillment of conditions ommitment issued by it. D. (Folio) Number(s): WARRANTY DEED This Warranty Deed, Made the 4th day of March, 2021, by Lyda M. Sanchez, a married person, joined by Diego Tenorio, her husba4 whos6,post office address is: 711 27th Street NW, Naples, FL 34120, hereinafter called the "Grantor", to l illia N. Kogok, Jr., a single person, whose post office address is: 3620 White Blvd., Naples, FL 3411tipreinafter called the "Grantee". WITNESSETH: That said Grantor, for arid in Dollars and No Cents ($450,000.00) aicf' acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells Grantee, all that certain land situate in Collier The East 75 feet of the West 150 feet of Tract 84 , the plat thereof, of record in Plat Book 7, Page(s Florida. on of the sum of Four Hundred Fifty Thousand able considerations, receipt whereof is hereby mises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the )rids. to wit: GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 27, according to , of the Public Records of Collier County, TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is,lawf y°seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and co ey saiq land; that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same agafnst e lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxesAaccruing subsequent to December 31, 2026, reservations, restrictions and easements of record, if any. (The terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" herein shall be construed to include all genders and singular or p1dral as the context indicates.) File No.: 21030192 Page 1 of 2 Page 387 of 403 °°° OR 5906 pm 2998 °°° IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. SIGNED IN THE PRESIJIINCE OF THE FOLLOWING WITNESSES TWO SEPAR,6TE,PjI �S)NTERESTED WITNESSES REQUIRED Witness Signature: Lyda M. Sanchez Printed Name: 'Signature: "Diego norio State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by meahs_of-9 ph, notarization, this 10th day of March, 2021 by Lyda M. Sanchez, a marriied-pe husband /are perso ally known to me or has/have produced drivirfice /77 Notary Public Signa ur, (SEAL) Printed Name: jand M. Pelham My Commissi Expire : 0 Online tary (Chec ox if acknowledgment done by Online Notarization) sicalpresemce orOonline and Diego 7enoho.her as identification. Bonded T�ru Budget Notary Servces File No.: 21030192 Page 388 of 403 Cofer er County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 I Email: GMDClientservices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership William N. Ko ok, Jr 100 b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the ercentaee of stocK owned by each: I Name and Address I % of Ownership I C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the iercentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership 01/2023 Page 1 of 3 Page 389 of 403 Coder Count 0 e f g Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the 9 CI.C.QI Q11U/U1 111111M Pd1 UICI b. Name and Address % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the �1111.C1b, bLULK11U1UClb, UC11C11Ud11Cb, UI PdlulCrb. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of III.CIb, 11 d LU(PUlduUn, IJdFMt![N1111J, Ur lrUbl: Name and Address Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: 01/2023 Page 2 of 3 Page 390 of 403 M Co er County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 2S2-1036 I Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov Date of option: Date option terminates: . or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, 1 attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. 1 understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov 9/26/24 Agent/Owner Signature Date William N. Kogok, Jr Agent/Owner Name (please print) 01/2023 Page 3 of 3 Page 391 of 403 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20240011254 1, William N. Kogok, Jr (print name), as (title, if applicable) of (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner® applicantQcontract purchasernand that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize Phoenix Associates of Florida, Inc to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. "Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member. " • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that Ithe s stated in it e �tue. 9/26/24 ignature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means oAaqut'ier) ysical presence or online notarization th� �_ day of 2Q&Nby (printed name of owner _,Z� Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: 11Mre personally known to me ❑ Has produced a current drivers license ❑ Has produced as identification. Notary Signature. -- TAM l STIEHL Notary Publk -State of Florida #• ! Commission M HH 137830 V.r' My Comm. Exaires Jun 4, 2025 sond*d through National Notary Assn. CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 Page 392 of 403 : \/; (§, 2 p! RR! § §e; . -- - — +/ _ _ r ~�Qa Q$\ " )\\ ° : (LL ;nIx g 0C R2 . o k \. - R: _ 2z ` )) °E - • .� X| N 3 ❑ H c ) § |; [ _§ { ;/ - ::�------ ( « : � )! (� / •'#- s � Y r r ;➢+�e?�x'`.r s�„k.Ys �"'f `:�•"°r: aye �.- xai rqh ,,� A �Ya,s"k�;�'�"Ik`vY �` N ti 7 1 .4 T �y D/ f�°tf AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-72, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did give notice by mail at least 30 days after receipt of letter indicating that the application is sufficient to the following property owners and or condominium and civic associations whose members may be impacted by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a variance or parking exemption. For the purposes of this requirement, the navies and addresses of property ovtneis shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities vrho have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change. Per attached letters and or property owner's list, which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. (Signature/of Applicant) State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Affidavit of Compliance was acknowledged before me this cP day of Amil _, 2025 by i►'uOmr known to me r who has produced (Si nature of Notary Public) Printed Name of Notary as identification. (Notary Seal) REBECCANIELSEN ■; *` MY COMMISSION # HH 606622 EXPIRES: February 26, 2029 I�FO•F F��P: Page 395 of 403 PHOENIX ASSOCIATES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC. Design Build General Contractor CGC1525327 I www.Phoenix-Associates.com 4/24/2025 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the sender has made a formal application to Collier County for a variance from the requirements of the zoning regulations as they apply to the following described property: The subject property is located at 3620 White Boulevard and further described as the West 150 feet of Tract 84, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 27, in Section 14, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. It is our intent to ask the County to allow us to request for an after -the -fact variance from Land Development Code (LDC) Section 2.03.01.13.2.d, for a 75-foot wide nonconforming lot of record in the Estate (E) Zoning District, to reduce the required eastern side yard from 7.5 feet to 4.2 feet to allow for the continued existence of a pool equipment shed and to allow a further reduction of said side yard to 2.95 feet to accommodate the structure's 1.25-foot roof overhang on the aforementioned property. You are encouraged to contact the sender of this letter in the event you would like additional explanation or further information. In any event, please be advised that we are interested in assuring you that our request should not adversely affect your property interest. Sincerely, Kira Orangio Phoenix Associates of Southwest Florida, LLC 13180 Livingston Rd, Ste 206 Naples, FL 34109 239-596-9111x219 KOrangio@phoenix-associates.com Page 396 of 403 co 0 0 rn co » » » » » » m 0) 000000000000 O O O o O O O O o O O o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 7 cD w o�w N�N(O No ao(omoomooroorrrnrn wornrrwrrrwrrr o) o) o) o o) o) o) a) 000(D o rn rn rn rn rn rn rn a) rn rn rn rn r r r r r r r r r r r r M M M M M M M M M M M M GD O 00 co GD Cl) 0 d LOF- LL LL LL LL OO 0 00 O - 0 W 0 LL LL LL 0 0 W 00 W In W W LL LL LL > w LL LL OOn 000000,000 lFLFNFLLFLLFLLO O LL O LL LL O LL O r!LL_ r r r r W W 2i 3i W W W 2i W 3i W N N N N N N N N N N N N z z z z z z z z z z z z » » 00 » » » wwwwwwwwwwww wwwwwwwwwwww wwwwwwwwwwww ¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢ C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 zzzzzzzzzzzz wwwwwwwwwwww 000000000000 J J J J J J J J J J J J 000000000000 000000000000 MMN 0 0 0 1TITIT 0 0 n n n n n n n n n n 0 0o v v v v v v v v v V M co M co M co co com M M J J J J J J J J J J Z LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL� �I J LL (Q (n (n (n (n (n (Q (n (Q (n Q N •Wwwwwwwwwwg J < J J J J J J J J J J LLLLLLLLLLLL<<<<< o LL z z z z z z z z z z (¢ > > U) J J w m m > W W Q F H = N O M Cl)V coO O m M m Q w w Of LU z W x } > ; Q ¢ w¢ W ¢ U Z) Q Q O>- N 0 0 0 0 Qy z F �Zm W W W —i—i 0>Ji Cl) LU wwww2z �v=orrxxxxw� Uo�< z� m n o 0 0 0 w O N N r �> O n> mID (`07 M (`O') M M c07 > co J Z U LU W U N C7 z F Z LU W of F O W Z Q W O Of Q Q J O 00 > j J U F3: x pmC7<0 LUO¢v~i ¢�O>5; W>d LLwp Q O J Z Y W W z U W 0 OfO ��c07Ofzg Q¢ 0 0 0 x x OY 2 2>3: SURVEY SKETCH OF BOUNDARY SURVEY NOT FOR FENCE CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR DESIGN COPYRIGHT 2021: F.L.A. SURVEYS CORP. THE LINES ON THIS SKETCH DO NOT CONSTITUTE OWNERSHIP. PAGE 1 OF 3 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR PAGE 3 OF 3 VEV 'IT, le STREET ADDRESS O3�' 3620 WHITE BLVD NAPLES, FL LEGAL DESCRIPTIONe r THE EAST 75 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET ssr9 TE OF F��peB OF TRACT 84, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT SURVEY �p NO. 27 , A SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED TN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 17 AND 18 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CERTIFIED TO : WILLIAM KOGOK, JR of S.82°02'42"E. 409.42' (G) CROWN OF ROAD FIR 5/8'. 5.82'02'07"E., 409.29' (M) ELEVATION = NO ID 11.2' NAVD OPRM LOCATION WHITE BLVD. (60' ROW) CENTERLINEI EDGE OF PAVEMENT ASPHALT 4• ALUMINUM FENCE � RIGHT OF WAY \\F2N\G FIR 5/8" FIR 5/8" NO ID ��C MN- NO ID N.89'38'59"W. 73.77' (M) �� FIR 5/8"�� N.8931'41"E. 75.00' No ID N.89'44'40"E. 74.88' (M) 5.89°40'50"E. 75. (P) N.89'31'41"E. 75.00' (G) 5.89°40'50"E. 75.00' (P) o � ;�(O APT Bgy,1� 1FIR W 75' OF90 5 8 O.0.a6eV1'� "6 AB �'Zyo TRACT 84 #8357„ 0.3' E sb°613 BENT _ 5 (n CENTERLINE 1 N 3 FIR 5/8" d v E 9 9.9 14.5 4.2 = o o No ID 11 TH AVE SW o o N ji �1 I o 0 C' (60' ROW) GO m o w 3m 1 .3 j wL,i3 110 GRAY O 0, N rn ro ° N o E 180' OF ro m DEC N TRACT 84 o PAD oQ 0 Zz 7.5' vi vi I DISTANCE FROM HOUSE TO LOT LINE HOUSE/FENCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE DISTANCE FROM FENCE TO LOT LINE (FENCE IS INSIDE .THE PROPERTY AT ALL LOCATIONS LOT LINE CERTIFICATION : I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS & MAPPERS CHAPTER 5J17.05-052, FLORIDA ADMINSTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 FLORIDA STATUTES. FIR 5/8" #8357 E 75' OF IW 150' OF 1 TRACT 84 1 235,1 I ', I I I I I I I I 1 1 FIR 5/8" FIR 5/8" 1 NO ID NO ID S.89'30'55"W. 74.83' (M) S.89°31'41"W. 75.00' (G) N.89°40'50"W. 75.00' (P) TRACT 85 'I N W � E i SCALE: 1" - 100' DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 5.7' o COVERED ENTRY ONE STORY RESIDENCE FEE _ 15.0' NAVD 58.2' ^ COVERED AREA SCREENED IN PULL FFE = 11.0' NAVD \ 20.2 N `GARAGE 20.2 OVER -HANG rt = 4.3' NAVD FEE _ POOL s,g• 12.5 NAVD EQUIP. SHE➢ i CONK WA CONC FEE /= FEE _ 13.3' NAVD 11.1' NAVD MEASURED BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON STATE PLANE COORDINATES (FLORIDA EAST ZONE), WHICH IS GRID NORTH AS ESTABLISHED BY NOS, AS ACQUIRED BY USING GPS TECHNOLOGY AND IS THE "BASIS OF BEARINGS". MEASUREMENTS LABELED AS (G) ARE THE CALCULATED GIPS PLAT BEARINGS. 0 100 200 BY : _ SURVEY DATE : _02/01/2022 CLINTON W. FINSTAD, , CFM, PLS #2453 RONALD W. WALLING PSM #6473 LELAND F. DySARD, PLS #3859 MARY E. FINSTAD, CFM, PSM #5901 QUALITY CONTROL NOT VALID WITHOUT SURVEYOR'S SIGNATURE AND EMBOSSED SEAL BY :MEF______ DATE :_02/03/2022 NOT A CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, EASEMENTS OR FREEDOM OF ENCUMBRANCES. FLORIDA STATUTE 5J-17.05 (3) (c): TWO SITE BENCHMARKS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTE: PROPERTY OWNER SHOULD OBTAIN WRITTEN FLOOD ZONE DETERMINATION FROM LOCAL PERMITTING, NOTE: IF APPLICABLE, FENCES SHOWN MEANDER PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION PLANNING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION. ON OR OFF LINES. (APPROX. LOCATION ONLY) 3884 PROGRESS AVE., SUITE 104 NOTE: REVISIONS NAPLES, FL 34104 INCOMPLIANCE WITH F.A.C. 5J-17.052 F.L.A. SURVEYS CORP. 239-403-1600 FAX 403-8600 (2) (d) (4) (IF LOCATION OF EASEMENTS GARAGE 239-404-7129 239-580-2795 OR RIGHT-OF-WAY OF RECORD, OTHER 10/03/2023 PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS &MAPPERS -LB 6569 239-250-2792 THAN THOSE ON RECORD PLAT, IS REQUIRED, THIS INFORMATION MUST BE PROJECT NO: 9220 BONITA BEACH ROAD, STE 200 FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR AND DRAWN BY: SVJ PARTY CHIEF: I AD BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 MAPPER. 22-100 - P PAGE 2 OF 3 NOT FOR FENCE CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR DESIGN PHOTO PAGE 3884 PROGRESS AVE., SUITE 104 F.L.A. SURVEYS CORP. NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS & MAPPERS - LB 6569 239-403-1600 FAX 403-8600 9220 BONITA BEACH ROAD, STE. 200 BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34135 239-403-1600 FAX403-8600 PROJECT NO. 22-10016 DRAWN BY: LFD IPARTY CHIEF: N/A Page 399 of 403 PAGE 3 OF 3 75. PBIDDE = PELICAN BAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DRAINAGE EASEMENT NOT VALID WITHOUT PAGES 1 76. PC =POINT OF CURVATURE AND 2 OF 3 77. PCC POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE GENERAL NOTES 78. PCP = PERMANENT CONTROL POINT Pc =PAGE ABSTRACT NOT REVIEWED 8. 0. PI =POINT OF INTERSECTION 81. PK = PARKER KALON NAIL N = NORTH 82. PLS = PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR S = SOUTH 83. POB = POINT OF BEGINNING E = EAST 84. POC = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT W = WEST, OR ANY COMBINATIONTHEREOF 85. PP = POWER POLE 1. ^= DEGREES 86. PRC = POINT OF REVERSE CURVE 2. ' = MINUTES WHEN USED IN A BEARING 87. PRM = PERMANENT REFERENCE 3. " = SECONDS WHEN USED IN A BEARING MONUMENT 4. ` = FEET WHEN USED IN A DISTANCE 88. PSM= PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER 5. " = INCHES WHEN USED IN A DISTANCE 89. P.0 & DE = PUBLIC UTILITY & DRAINAGE 6. ± _ "MORE OR LESS" OR "PLUS OR MINUS" EASEMENT 7. A = ARC DISTANCE 90. PUE = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 8. AC = ACRES 91. PT = POINT OF TANGENCY 9. A/C = AIR CONDITIONING PAD 92. PVS = PAVERS 10. A.E = ACCESS EASEMENT 93. Q.W.P.E. = QUAIL WEST PERPETUAL EASEMENT 10 A. ADJ= ADJUSTED 94. (R) = RADIAL 11. AF = ALUMINUM FENCE 95. R = RADIUS 12. AMUE = AVE MARIA UTILITY EASEMENT 96. RING = ITEM DETECTED BY METAL DETECTOR BUT 12A. APPROX. = APPROXIMATE NOT RECOVERED 12B. AVE = AVENUE 97. RNG= RANGE 13. B.E. = BUFFER EASEMENT 98. ROW = RIGHT-OF-WAY 14. BM = BENCHMARK 99. RR SPK = RAILROAD SPIKE 15. BOB = BASIS OF BEARING 100. SAT= SATELLITE DISH 16. BRG = BEARING 101. S.D.E = STREET DRAINAGE EASEMENT 17. C# = CURVE NUMBER 102. SEC = SECTION 18. C = CALCULATED 103. SDH = SET DRILL HOLE, NO ID 19. CB = CATCH BASIN 104. SIR = SET 5/8" IRON ROD WITH LB 20. CHB = CHORD BEARING NUMBER OF CORPORATION 21. CHD = CHORD 105. SPK&D = SET PK WITH DISC WITH LB NUMBER 22. CLF = CHAINLINK FENCE 106. IBM TEMPORARY BENCH MARK 23. CM = CONCRETE MONUMENT 107. TEL = TELEPHONE FACILITIES 24. CO = CLEAN OUT 108. TOB = TOP OF BANK 25. COL = COLUMN 109. TP = TRANSMITTER PAD 26. CONC = CONCRETE 110. TWP= TOWNSHIP 27. CPP = CONCRETE POWER POLE 111. U.E = UTILITY EASEMENT 28. CSW = CONCRETE SIDEWALK 112. VF = VINYL FENCE 29. CTV= CABLE TV RISER 113. VLV = VALVE 30. C.U.E= COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY 114. W = WATER SERVICE EASEMENT 115.WIT = WITNESS 31. D = DEED 115. WB = WATER BOX 32. D.E= DRAINAGE EASEMENT 116. WF= WOOD FENCE 33. DH = DRILL HOLE 117. WPP= WOOD POWER POLE 34. DI = DROP INLET 118. = DELTA OR CENTRAL ANGLE OF CURVE 35. ELEC= ELECTRIC 119. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND IN 36. EOP = EDGE OF PAVEMENT DECIMALS THEREOF 37. FOR = EDGE OF ROAD 120. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE N.A.V.D. UNLESS 38. EOW = EDGE OF WATER OTHERWISE STATED 39. F= AS LABELED OR FOUND IN THE FIELD 121. ALL PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN WITHOUT 40. F.A.C. = FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE DIMENSIONS ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES 41. FCC = FOUND CROSS CUT ONLY. THAT THEY DO EXIST, BUT WERE NOT 42. FCM = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT NECESSARILY MEASURED IN THE FIELD. 43. FEMA = FEDERAL EMERGENCY 122. NOTE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS FROM LATEST DEED MANAGEMENT AGENCY OF RECORD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 44. FDH = FOUND DRILL HOLE 123. EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAYS SHOWN ARE PER 45. FIE = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION RECORDED PLAT OR AS FURNISHED BY THE CLIENT 46. FH = FIRE HYDRANT 124. FOUNDATION LINE BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE 47. FIP = FOUND IRON PIPE GROUND IS NOT REFLECTED 48. FIR = FOUND IRON ROD 125. THIS SURVEY IS NOT TO BE USED FOR 49. FN = FOUND NAIL CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES UNDER ANY 50. FND = FOUND CONDITION UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED 51. FN&D = FOUND NAIL & DISC 126. NO UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR 52. FPK = FOUND PK NAIL IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT 53. FPK&D = FOUND PK NAIL AND DISC AS NOTED 53. G = GEODETIC 127. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING 54.GPS = GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAYS, AND/OR OWNERSHIP 54. GCE = GOLF COURSE EASEMENT WERE FURNISHED THIS SURVEYOR EXCEPT AS 55. HCP = HANDICAP PARKING SHOWN 56. IE = IRRIGATION EASEMENT 128. THERE ARE NO VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS EXCEPT 57.ELLEG = ILLEGIBLE THOSE AS DELINEATED ON THIS PLAT OF SURVEY 129. 57. LB = LICENSED BUSINESS TIES ARE TO FIELD LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 58. LBE = LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT 130. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS AND/OR 59. LE = LANDSCAPE EASEMENT EASEMENTS THAT ARE NOT RECORDED ON SAID 60. L.M.E = LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT PLAT THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC 61. LP = LIGHT POLE RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY 62. M = MEASURED 131. FENCES MEANDER ON AND OFF LINE, APPROXIMATE 63. ME = MAINTENANCE EASEMENT LOCATION ONLY UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. 132. THE 64. MH = MANHOLE LINES ON THIS SKETCH DO NOT CONSTITUTE 65. N.A.V.D. = NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL OWNERSHIP DATUM 133. THE INTENT OF THIS SURVEY IS FOR TITLE 65.A NAVD = NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL TRANSFER ONLY UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE 134. DATUM FLORIDA STATUTE 61G17-6.004: TWO SITE BENCHMARKS 66. N.G.V.D. = NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL ARE REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION. 135. THIS SURVEY DATUM DOES NOT REFLECT OR DETERMINE OWNERSHIP. 67. NO ID = NO IDENTIFYING MARKINGS 121. F.E.M.A. FLOOD HAZARD MAPPING: THIS DATE 68. (NR) = NON -RADIAL PRODUCT WAS NOT DESIGNED TO MAKE PRECISE 69. NTS= NOT TO SCALE IN/OUT FLOOD RISK DETERMINATIONS. THIS 70.OHP= OVERHEAD POWER PRODUCT IS NOT SUITABLE FOR 71.OHU = OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS AND CANNOT 72.O.R. = OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK BE USED TO 73. OIS = OFFSET DETERMINE ABSOLUTE DELINEATIONS OF FLOOD 74. P = PLAT Page 400 of 403 BOUNDARIES. CALL 1-877-FEMAMAP OR EMAIL A MAP SPECIALIST AT W W W.FEMA.ORG/MITff SD/F, 137. PROPERTY OWNER SHOULD OBTAIN WRITTEN FLOOD ZONE DETERMINATION FROM LOCAL PERMITTING, PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION PLANNING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION 138. IN COMPLIANCE WITH F.A.C. 61G17-6.0031 (4) (E) - IF LOCATION OF EASEMENTS OR RIGHT-OF-WAY OF RECORD, OTHER THAN THOSE ON RECORD PLAT,IS REQUIRED, THIS INFORMATION MUST BE FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 139. IF APPLICABLE, FENCES SHOWN MEANDER ON OR OFF LINES (APPROXIMATE LOCATION ONLY) 140. ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES, SUCH AS FURRING STRIPS, SIDING, CORNICES, STUCCO, ETC., OUTSIDE THE LINE OF THE STRUCTURE HAVE BEEN TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHEN GIVING TIES FROM THE STRUCTURE TO THE LOT LINES. 141. ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO THE FACT THAT THIS SURVEY MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED OR ENLARGED IN SIZE DUE TO REPRODUCTION. THIS SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN OBTAINING SCALED DATA. Page 401 of 403 (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. I. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed. lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s) NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTINGNOTI_CE STA fE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED IYLc. o(Zcn ty WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED Bj SECTION 10.03.000F THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER VA- Ptdoa Noo I 1 a5K wcl SIGNA; 1RE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O-e NA 1E (TAfSTATI-ZYPED O PRINTED)IP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 11 The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this of I day of M 207S. by 1 ra o ran / D , personally known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. KALEIGH BELL :Notary Public -State of Florida - oc Commission # HH 108083 My Commission Expires June 28. 2025 My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Signature of NotaryPublic k�UAA—'W1 Printed Nat ie of NotaryPublic Rev. 3/4/2015 Page 402 of 403 � f .. � \ lB � .. 1 4jk.:#� ... ivy ��•{ , iL � Y—r"�J.a" ) ' t Sid. 1.. 66►}�� Aq3620 WHITE BOULEVARD Petition No. PL20240011254 HEX JUNE Growth Management Community Development FL :John Kelly, Planner 111: 239-252-5719 11Horseshoe1 1aP i " 1�14�WRi MNI� ANklbilt� 6 Aig- ?":;!?�."��.,_,._ .. �/As.l"� >-'n Y�,��.,y�' ,. "T�i .,i��-�..-_ ..._,.,a.. ram, ate ,c .. ,.✓.�� .. .�.- - _ ,.,z. '