Loading...
Backup Documents 05/27/2025 Item #11B PresentationMulti-family Parking On-Site Demand Study May 27, 2025 Background On October 22, 2024, the Board directed staff to compare Collier County multifamily parking standards with various other Florida jurisdictions On January 14, 2025, staff presented a multifamily parking standards matrix comparing Collier and 11 other Florida jurisdiction. The findings identified Collier to be within the middle range, not too lenient or too restrictive. To get a better understanding of multifamily parking supply/demand needs within Collier the Board directed staff to: Conduct on-site evaluations of multifamily developments within the County and report back findings. Additionally, the Board directed staff to halt the approval of any multifamily APRs moving forward . LDC 4.05.04 Multi-Family Parking Space Requirements (Includes Townhomes, Apartments and Condominiums): Building/Unit Type Parking Requirement Multi-family dwellings (per unit)1 space per unit Visitor parking Efficiency unit: 0.5 spaces per unit 1-bedroom unit: 0.75 spaces per unit 2-bedroom or larger unit: 1 space per unit Office/Administrative buildings 50% of normal parking requirements Small-scale recreation facilities If majority of units are not within 300 feet: 50% of normal parking requirements If majority of units are within 300 feet: 25% of normal parking requirements Minimum of 2 spaces for recreation facility (exclusive of dwelling unit parking spaces) Staff Study In response to this directive, the Zoning Division staff compiled a list of 12 communities representing a broad cross-section of multifamily projects located throughout the County including: 4 Townhome , 5 Apartment & 3 Condominium communities 5 Communities with Administrative Parking Reductions (APRs) 7 Communities without APRs. Prior to each on-site visit staff reviewed: Parking reductions Prior parking related code enforcement complaints Site Development Plans (SDP) & Construction Plan and Final Subdivision Plats (PPL) Windshield survey were conducted: February 11 and March 4, 2025 6:30 - 8:00 PM Tuesday-Thursday On-site Observations Key questions staff asked during site visits: Is there enough parking for residents, visitors, and service vehicles? What percentage of parking occupied/vacant? Are there issues with illegally parked cars or other parking-related nuisances? Does the site have designated spaces for guest parking, handicapped parking, and other needs? Are parking issues an enforcement issue or an issue with sufficient public parking? Parking Observation Comparison Community Name Findings Aster @ Lely No issues observed Marco Shores Country Club No issues observed The Crest No issues observed The Ranch at Orange Blossom Parking exceeded the minimum requirement but had on-street and off-street parking issues. 10-12 unlawful parked vehicles. Meadow Lake Apartments Unlawful parking by a food truck was observed, but no unlawful street parking. Naples Walk No issues observed St. Croix at Pelican Marsh No issues observed Allura No issues observed Largo Apartments No issues observed Summit Place in Naples 20 vehicles unlawfully parked on the street; parking area largely vacant (enforcement issue not parking availability issue) Ol ́𝑒𝑒 at Lely Resort No issues observed Avion Woods 50% of driveways vacant, no unlawful parking observed. SEE “ATTACHMENT A” FOR MORE DETAILED ON-SITE OBSERVATIONS Parking Observations: The Orange Blossom Ranch Townhome Parking Observation Comparison: Development Parking Sufficient Required Parking Provided Parking Olé at Lely Resort 1,399 Spaces 1,605 Spaces (22 % above required parking) Summit Place in Naples 532 Spaces 844 Spaces (58% above required parking) The Ranch at Orange Blossom 528 Spaces 604 spaces (14% above required parking) Avion Woods 54 Spaces 54 Spaces Note: Driveways and garages are counted towards off-street parking requirements Multifamily Parking Standard Comparison – Attachment C Conclusion: The Ranch at Orange Blossom was the only multifamily community of the 12 observed with a significant parking issue. Based on the amount of empty driveways observed within the Ranch at Orange Blossom and the under provided publicly accessible parking staff determined further examination, and focus should be placed on townhome style developments. Staff observed no parking issues within the 5 multi-family communities with approved APRs. Staff will await direction from the Board regarding administrative parking reductions and deviations for multifamily developments. If directed, staff will initiate the process of reviewing and drafting proposed amendments to the Land Development Code. Board Consideration: An increase in the multi-family parking may render a larger percentage of existing multifamily complexes as ‘non-conforming’ under a more restrictive standard . Ch. 2023-349, Laws of Florida (amending “Senate Bill 250”) prohibits a more restrictive amendment to LDC before October 1, 2026.