Agenda 05/13/2025 Item #17D (Ordinance: Petition PL20230016891, Armantrout Land Rezone)5/13/2025
Item # 17.D
ID# 2025-1177
Executive Summary
Recommendation to approve an ordinance rezoning 5.28± acres from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to the
Residential Single-Family District-1 (RSF-1) zoning district to allow up to three single-family dwelling units with a
maximum density of up to one dwelling unit per 1.74± acres on property located at the southeast corner of Sunset
Boulevard and Whitaker Road, at 3498 Sunset Boulevard. (PL20230016891)
OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff's findings and
recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC)
regarding the above-referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition and ensure the
project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's
interests are maintained.
CONSIDERATIONS: The property is 5.28± acres (Parcel No. 00423560004) located at the southeast corner of Sunset
Boulevard and Whitaker Road, at 3498 Sunset Boulevard, in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26, East, Collier
County, Florida. The petitioner requests a rezone from the Rural Agriculture (A) Zoning District to a Residential Single-
Family-1 (RSF-1) Zoning District, allowing up to three single-family dwelling units with a maximum density of one
dwelling per 1.74± acres on 5.28± acres of property.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard petition
RZ-PL20230016891 on April 3, 2025, and by a vote of 7 to 0 recommended to forward this petition to the Board with a
recommendation of approval. No letters of objection have been received. As such, this petition will be placed on the
Summary Agenda.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC and further recommends that the Board
of County Commissioners approves the request for Petition RZ-PL20230016891, Armantrout Land.
This item advances the Collier County Strategic Plan Objective within Quality of Place, supporting and enhancing the
character of our community.
FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset
the impact of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the
Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain the adopted Level of
Service (LOS) for public facilities. Other fees collected prior to the issuance of a building permit include building permit
review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the
Planning Commission to analyze this petition.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The subject site is located within the Urban Designation, Urban Residential
Mixed-Use Subdistrict of the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The subject site is 5.28±
acres and identified by the Property Appraiser as Parcel no. 00423560004. The property is currently zoned Rural
Agricultural, and the maximum density for this subdistrict property is 0.2 DU/acre (1 unit per 5 acres) as identified in
the Land Development Code provisions.
The subject site is not located within an area of a Mixed-Use Activity Center Residential Density Band and is not
eligible for a 3-unit per acre increase under the density rating system provisions. Accordingly, the applicant is seeking to
rezone the property to RSF-1 to allow 1.76 DU/A, which is consistent with the objectives of the GMP. The
Comprehensive Planning staff finds that the proposed project, PL20230016891 Armantrout rezone to allow three
residential dwellings at a density of 1.76 DU/acre is consistent with the goals of the Growth Management Plan.
Comprehensive Planning Staff recommends the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the
Board of County Commissioners.
Transportation Element:
Page 5002 of 5243
5/13/2025
Item # 17.D
ID# 2025-1177
The Transportation Planning staff has evaluated the proposed changes. The changes present no transportation-related
issues with consistency. The proposed rezone represents a deminimis number of additional trips and impacts on the
adjacent roadways. Therefore, Transportation Planning staff find the petition consistent with the GMP.
Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME):
Environmental staff evaluated the petition. The property is 5.28± acres; the project is consistent with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the CCME.
GMP Conclusion:
The GMP is the prevailing document to support land-use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff are required to
make a recommendation regarding whether a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the
recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition.
This petition is consistent with the GMP.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The Petitioner is requesting a rezone from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to
the Residential Single-Family District-1 (RSF-1) zoning district to allow up to three single-family dwelling units. The
attached staff report and recommendations of the Planning Commission are advisory only and are not binding on you.
All testimony given must be under oath. The Petitioner has the burden to prove that the proposed rezoning is consistent
with all the criteria set forth below, and you may question the Petitioner or staff, to satisfy yourself that the necessary
criteria have been satisfied. Should you consider denying the rezone, to ensure that your decision is not later found to be
arbitrary, discriminatory, or unreasonable, the denial must be based upon competent, substantial evidence that the
proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below.
Criteria for Straight Rezones:
1. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, future land use map, and
elements of the Growth Management Plan?
2. Will the proposed rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern?
3. Would the proposed rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and
nearby districts?
4. Are the existing district boundaries illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change?
5. Do changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary?
6. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood?
7. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed
incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic,
including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise, affect public safety?
8. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem?
9. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas?
10. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area?
11. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accordance with existing regulations?
12. Will the proposed change constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with
public welfare?
13. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning?
14. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County?
15. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
16. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be
required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning
classification.
17. What is the impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent
with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and
Page 5003 of 5243
5/13/2025
Item # 17.D
ID# 2025-1177
implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as
amended?
18. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to this rezone request that the Board of County
Commissioners deems important in protecting public health, safety, and welfare?This item has been
approved as to form and legality, and it requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. –DDP
RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve the request for Petition RZ - PL20230016891, Armantrout Land Rezone
PREPARED BY: Timothy Finn, AICP, Planner III, Zoning Division
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Staff Report- Armantrout Land (RZ)
2. Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance
3. Attachment B - Application-Backup Materials
4. Attachment C - Hearing Advertising Signs
5. legal ad - agenda ID 25-1177 -PL20230016891-Armantrout rezone - 5.13.25 BCC
Page 5004 of 5243
RZ-PL20230016891; Armantrout Land
Revised: March 17, 2025 Page 1 of 8
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION
GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
HEARING DATE: APRIL 3, 2025
SUBJECT: RZ-PL20230016891; ARMANTROUT LAND
Owner: Agents:
The Freddie and Tammy Karen Bishop Margaret Emblidge, AICP
Sue Armantrout Family Trust,
dated June 11, 2021
3499 Sunset Boulevard
Naples, FL 34112
PMS Inc. of Naples
3125 54th Terrace SW
Naples, FL 34116
LJA Engineering, Inc.
7400 Trail Boulevard, Ste. 200
Naples, FL 34108
REQUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider a rezone
from the Rural Agriculture (A) Zoning District to a Residential Single-Family-1 (RSF-1) Zoning
District to allow up to three single-family dwelling units with a maximum density of up to one
dwelling per 1.74+/- acres on 5.28+/- acres of property.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The property is 5.28+/- acres (Parcel No. 00423560004) located at the southeast corner of Sunset
Boulevard and Whitaker Road, at 3498 Sunset Boulevard, in Section 16, Township 50 South,
Range 26, East, Collier County, Florida. (see location map, page 2)
Page 5005 of 5243
RZ-PL20230016891; Armantrout Land
Revised: March 17, 2025 Page 2 of 8
Page 5006 of 5243
RZ-PL20230016891; Armantrout Land
Revised: March 17, 2025 Page 3 of 8
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The subject property is a 5.28+/- acre site located at 3498 Sunset Boulevard, at the southeast
corner of the intersection of Whitaker Road and Sunset Boulevard. According to the
boundary survey, the property features one existing single-family dwelling with an attached
accessory garage. To the north of the single-family dwelling is a one-story garage, and to the
east is a two-story garage with an aluminum carport. The property was created by combining
multiple nonconforming lots prior to October 14, 1974, and was deemed to be legal
nonconforming lots. Once they were combined for development purposes, they became a
single, legally conforming lot and lost their non-conforming status. Since the parcel has been
developed, it cannot be split into its former configuration. The property is zoned Rural
Agriculture (A) Zoning District, which has a minimum lot size of five acres. The property, if
split, would need to be rezoned to a residential single-family district. As such, the applicant is
requesting to rezone from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Residential Single-
Family-1 (RSF-1) Zoning District to allow the platting of three lots, with one single-family
dwelling per lot. In essence, the rezone petition will allow the existing single-family dwelling
unit and two additional dwelling units for a total of three units.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North: Whitaker Road (local road) then developed with agricultural uses with a
current zoning designation of Rural Agriculture (A) Zoning District
South: Developed with single-family residential with a current zoning designation of
Rural Agriculture (A) Zoning District
East: Undeveloped with vacant land with a current zoning designation of Rural
Agriculture (A) Zoning District
West: Sunset Boulevard (local road) is currently being developed with multi-family
residential with a current zoning designation of Santa Barbara-Whitaker
RPUD that is approved for 216 multi-family dwelling units
Aerial Map - Collier County Property Appraiser
Page 5007 of 5243
RZ-PL20230016891; Armantrout Land
Revised: March 17, 2025 Page 4 of 8
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY:
The subject site is situated within the Urban Residential Mixed-Use Subdistrict of the Future
Land Use Map in the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The subject site is 5.28+/- acres and is
identified by the Property Appraiser as Parcel No. 00423560004. The property is currently
zoned Rural Agricultural and the maximum density for this subdistrict property is 0.2 DU/acre
(1 unit per 5 acres) as identified in the Land Development Code (LDC) provisions. The subject
site is not located within the area of a Mixed-Use Activity Center Residential Density Band. It
is, therefore, not eligible for a 3-unit-per-acre increase under the density rating system
provisions. Accordingly, the applicant is seeking to rezone the property to RSF-1 to allow 1.76
DU/A, which is consistent with the objectives of the GMP.
The Comprehensive Planning staff finds that the proposed project PL20230016891 Armantrout
rezone to allow three residential dwellings at a density of 1.76 DU/acre is consistent with the
goals of the Growth Management Plan. Comprehensive Planning Staff recommends the
Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the Board of County
Commissioners (Board).
Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has evaluated the proposed changes.
The changes present no transportation-related issues in terms of consistency. The proposed
rezone represents a Deminimis number of additional trips and impacts on the adjacent
roadways. Therefore, Transportation Planning staff finds the petition consistent with the GMP.
Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental staff evaluated
the petition. The property is 5.28+/- acres; the project is consistent with the goals, objectives,
and policies of the CCME.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including Section
10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone
Findings”), which establishes the legal basis to support the CCPC’s recommendation.
Drainage: The proposed zoning amendment request is not anticipated to create drainage
problems in the area. Future site improvements will be addressed through the Environmental
Resource Permitting (ERP) process with the South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD) and also evaluated through the Collier County Site Development Plans (SDP) and
Plat Permit (PPL) permitting process.
Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition. There is little
to no sensitive habitat remaining on the property, as it has been impacted by the development of
homes. The project will be required to preserve 15% of the existing native vegetation, which
will be addressed at SDP/PPL review per LDC 3.05.07.B. No listed animal species were
observed on the property.
Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition and
recommends approval of this request.
Utility Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the south
wastewater service area of the Collier County Water-Sewer District (CCWSD). Water and
wastewater services are available via existing infrastructure within the adjacent right-of-way.
Page 5008 of 5243
RZ-PL20230016891; Armantrout Land
Revised: March 17, 2025 Page 5 of 8
Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. Any improvements to the
CCWSD’s water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the
project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at
no cost to the County upon acceptance of the utilities.
Zoning Services Review: The local area's land use pattern consists of single-family and
multifamily residential areas, as well as agricultural uses. The current zoning is Rural
Agriculture (A) Zoning District, which permits a single-family dwelling with a minimum lot
size of five acres. The rezoning is necessary to develop the site into three lots, each with a
single-family dwelling. Currently, there is one existing single-family dwelling unit on the
property with the intent of two additional dwelling units for a total of three residential units.
According to the current future land use map, the subject property is located within the Urban
Mixed-Use District, which permits four units per acre in the Urban Residential Subdistrict.
The subject property is bordered on the north, east, and south by Rural Agriculture (A)
zoning and is developed with a single-family dwelling and agricultural uses. The property to
the west is currently being developed with multi-family dwellings. The proposed rezoning to
permit two additional single-family dwelling units is compatible and complementary to the
existing single-family dwellings in the vicinity. Therefore, the determination of zoning staff
that the proposed rezone from a Rural Agriculture (A) Zoning District to a Residential
Single-Family-1 (RSF-1) Zoning District to allow the platting of three lots with one single-
family dwelling per lot for a total of three units is comparable and compatible with the
surrounding land uses and consistent with the LDC and the Future Land Use Plan.
REZONE FINDINGS:
LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and
recommendations to the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners…shall
show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in
relation to the following when applicable.” (Zoning Division staff responses in non-bold):
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and
policies of the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and the elements of the GMP.
Comprehensive Planning staff has determined the petition is consistent with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP.
2. The existing land use pattern.
The proposed rezone will not affect the existing land use pattern. The subject property
is situated in an urbanized area of the county, near the intersection of Santa Barbara
Boulevard and Whitaker Road. Single-family residential and agricultural uses
surround the subject property. To the west, a multi-residential development is
currently underway.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby
districts.
The rezoning will not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts
to adjacent and nearby districts. The proposed RSF-1 zoning district intends to permit
two additional single-family dwellings that are compatible and complementary to the
other existing single-family dwellings in the vicinity.
Page 5009 of 5243
RZ-PL20230016891; Armantrout Land
Revised: March 17, 2025 Page 6 of 8
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
The existing district boundaries are logically drawn. There are no boundary changes
proposed.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed
rezoning necessary.
The proposed rezoning from A to RSF-1 is not specifically necessary. However, the
petitioner believes that the rezoning is necessary to accommodate the platting of three
lots, each with a single-family dwelling.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood. Development will meet site design standards set by the LDC.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic
congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land
uses because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including
activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect
public safety.
As noted above, Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the
GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of first development order
(SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other
applicable concurrency management regulations when seeking development
approvals.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
It is not anticipated that the rezone request will create drainage problems in the area.
Future site improvements will be evaluated for compliance with stormwater best
management practices, water quality, and water quantity through the Environmental
Resource Permitting (ERP) process with the South Florida Water Management
District (SFWMD) and also evaluated through the Collier County Site Development
Permit (SDP)/Plans and Plat Permit (PPL) permitting process.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
Development of the site will need to meet the site design standards as set forth in the
Local Development Code (LDC). The proposed rezone from a Rural Agriculture (A)
Zoning District to a Residential Single-Family-1 (RSF-1) Zoning District would not
reduce light or air to adjacent areas.
10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the
adjacent areas.
Property value is affected by many factors. Market conditions drive it, and it is
Page 5010 of 5243
RZ-PL20230016891; Armantrout Land
Revised: March 17, 2025 Page 7 of 8
generally a subjective determination. Zoning alone is not likely to adversely affect
property values. Generally, market conditions prevail.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or
development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
Staff does not anticipate the rezoning would be a deterrent to the improvement of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare.
If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed rezone,
then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they
are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change
does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further
determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans
are in the public interest.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in
accordance with existing zoning.
The existing zoning is Rural Agriculture (A) Zoning District, which permits the
construction of a single-family home on five acres. The petitioner contends that
rezoning is necessary to develop the site with two additional single-family dwellings
for a total of three single-family dwellings.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood
or the County.
It is staff’s position that the proposed rezoning to RSF-1 is not out of scale with the
needs of the community or the County.
15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the
proposed use in districts already permitting such use.
There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the proposed uses;
however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a
zoning decision. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the
GMP and the LDC; staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a
specific petition.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration,
which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of
potential uses under the proposed zoning classification.
Any future development anticipated by the rezoning would require an extensive
evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the
building permit process.
Page 5011 of 5243
RZ-PL20230016891; Armantrout Land
Revised: March 17, 2025 Page 8 of 8
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and
services is consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County
Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier
County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended.
A water main is available along Whitaker Road and wastewater main is available
along Whitaker Road. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities
to serve the project. Any improvements to the CCWSD’s water or wastewater
systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the
responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost
to the County upon acceptance of the utilities.
The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC
regarding Adequate Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all
applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This
petition has been reviewed by county staff responsible for the jurisdictional elements
of the GMP as part of the rezoning process. Staff have concluded that the developer
has provided appropriate commitments, ensuring that the impacts on the Level of
Service (LOS) will be minimized.
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board shall deem important in
the protection of public health, safety, and welfare.
The Board will determine this during its advertised public hearing.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
The NIM was scheduled for January 9, 2025, at 5:30 pm at the South Regional Library, Meeting
Room A, 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples, FL 34113. No members of the public were
present or participating remotely; therefore, no recording or transcript is available. A copy of
the NIM advertising is included in Attachment B – Backup Materials.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION:
This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as it does not
fall within the scope of land development project reviews identified in Section 2-1193 of the
Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances.
COUNTY ATTORNEY REVIEW:
The County Attorney’s Office reviewed this staff report for content and legality on March 17,
2025.
RECOMMENDATION:
Zoning Division staff recommends the CCPC forward petition RZ-PL20230016891 –
Armantrout Land to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation for approval.
Attachments:
A) Proposed Ordinance
B) Application/Backup materials
Page 5012 of 5243
ORDINANCE NO.2O25 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2OO4-4I, AS
AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LANI)
DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR TIIE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING
ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL
PROPERTY FROM THE RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A)
ZONING DISTRICT TO THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE.
FAMILY DISTRICT-I (RSF-I) ZONING DISTRICT TO
ALLOW UP TO THREE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM DENSITY OF UP TO ONE
DWELLING UNIT PER I.74+ ACRES ON 5.28+ ACRES OF
PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF SUNSET BOULEVARD AND WHITAKER ROAD, AT
3,198 SUNSET BOULEVARD, IN SECTION I6, TOWNSHIP
50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
1PL2023001689r1
WHEREAS, Karen Bishop of P.M.S., Inc. of Naples, on behalf of property owners
Freddie E. Amantrout, Jr. and Tammy Sue Amantrout as Trustees of the Freddie and Tammy
Sue Armantrout Family Trust dated June I I , 2021, petitioned the Board of County
Commissioners to changs the zoning classification ofthe herein described real property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. that:
SECTION ONE:
The zoning classification of the herein described real property more particularly
described in Exhibit "A", located in Seclion t6, Township 50 south, Range 26 East, collier
County, Florida, is changed from the Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District to the Residential
Single-Family District-l (RSF-I) Zoning District to allow up to three single family dwelling
units with a maximum density of one dwelling unit per 1.74,r acres on a 5.2g+ acre project,
limited to single-family dwelling use, subject to the conceptual Site plan as shown in Exhibit
"8", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The appropriate zoning atlas map or
I24-CPS-02539/ t927 t87 / tl 33
Armanfout Land (RZ)
RZ-PL2023 00 I 689 I 3 / 4 /202 5R
Page I of2
o"
Page 5013 of 5243
maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land
Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly.
SECTION TWO
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County
ATTEST:
CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK
By,
. Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legality:
Derek D. Perry
Assistant County Attomey
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Legal Description
Exhibit "B" - Conceptual Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Location Site Map
[24-CPS-02539/ 1927 t87
^)
33
Armantrout Land (RZ)
RZ-PL202300 I 689 I 3 / 4 /2025R
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA
By:
Burt L. Saunders, Chairman
,
o
OY
Page 2 of 2
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this _ day of _2025.
Page 5014 of 5243
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE NORTH 119.50 FEET OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE
NW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUIH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS AND EXCEPT
THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY SAID LANDS LYNG AND
BEING IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AND
THE WEST 1/2 OF rHE EAST 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS AND EXCEPT THE
NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY SAID LANDS LYING AND BEING
IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
AND
THE NW 1/4 OF rHE SE 1/4 OF lHE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTTON 16,
TOWNSHIP 50 SOUIH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET AND
THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT.OF-WAY SAID LANDS LYING AND
BEING IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Page I of I
cao
Page 5015 of 5243
c|'o
!
aa
7
JJ
E
!
5
E
e
E
!
-,!
:E!r
!!EBiEtr
9!aE
r rgH
iils
:!e;
ie!E
!j .:?
9:
iE.2
t:
!1
t!!
A
!
ri!t!::
i!iiiii
ll;;l;;
il1t:!!!:ri'
i=i,
-Il1l
'$
i;
I
,!
!r
I
*4!Iii
rr
il!
[r '
;i
I
I
E
ri
!i
!i
!!'!
l:'
Jii
l!
!i
rll
ltqIttr:.
iii!i:!ii!ir
;;cl;'
lir
r!!,
!3lri!llrl!!:iili:i:i
i!!ii
i!i:i
i!i:!
?E;E'lil!!
B!!ili:i
;i
i:
i::
t;;i!
:!
ri
!i r' I-rl !i ll
I; ri ,i,& ;t t!
;!ili!i
:i! ii Ii
;ffili t:
Eili!!ii
;ilifr,lii
fBr rti .!t
ili il! !i;;33. tgz i!3-
. il:E :i:E isig
$ i;:E, i!:i, :;ii
;aiEi
iliE x;:!i; rEE z*:E! u?i !i:
: !r: sE! Se?:il!!;ill
t:
!.:
li
i:
ii
j
li
ii
6
i
il
;l
Ii
!i
r lir
.eq
i1
h
u'tlI
J
rI'!
i
I
z.T
oao
a>ti>i
<da.
)a)
a-, z6A
hco
o.-
=
ii
L
!!
il
ti
I
ii
!
rl
ll!.
it
r--1
E
E
E
{
;-jt.
-r 5_;::- .f
:
t
i
:t
:1
rl
i!
!iil
a-
:*
!c
j
th.
6-
c.
E
o-
E
!
U
!'t
o
*_L,,
I
s
I,,_l_-j
t
Page 5016 of 5243
cAoI(,a.
oo
F
0.
E li!sE;:!I
qEh=
eir5
aii !
Ei:6d!9!
i
i
I
!
i
E
!E
:r
!r!
;
q:
i!loi
I
I
I I.l
!
!
;
IrI
!..i
g
'l
?
i
a
I
?
zl
!l
"i
I-
T
-.i
t p:
I
Nit.i;
I
l-"AE;rgEt:IE:9J",:: iilEr_:Jisti9E-H
!!!;
Ei
it:l
E
Il.\iF
,
F
a
E
:IE6A
JI
tIt!I;T01
:I
r!::!a:
!l!ti!ti
lsii
9ttrE
'I
i
I
t
E;
ahF
E3<
- 9!"E
Y sEi
.-bPE
a !98lJ dlr It4.Ez
t- f bEi
zz\z1l'2..;5eEZ 66:
c( EEo10-E
zd.E
E6
ta*o:ololruxnrucmo Page 5017 of 5243
e'1o@I.t 4ps 16r |6l..*)tiii .LL'€'r] 'FtdoN'p^|t |.ru.S 66rerEAutuV S lwotP.o al r@lutuv t.tPP.rJ II it€.dillIt!
c0
F
m
X
D
n
le11-19-rq3;g .09 prE^alnog tasunS
N
Fo
__-l
\
;+o
.C
.90d.
-o
\o
.E'
r!o&.
!-
0)
-Y
i
=Page 5018 of 5243
\o-(oo)
.EcoN
EE2ol!-EIotJo
G
JEsrrr
g
O)@
@
oo(f)
NONJ
tL
i-o
-o
Efz
c
,o.=
q)
TL
(,
.i
F
X
s.l
o-
(E
Co
o
C)o
---a
s
t2irotlJ=
Pg
J
I
(.)
E
16r
(i
ofo Page 5019 of 5243
PMSInc. of Naples
Land Development Consultant
3125 54th Terrace SW, Naples, FL 34116 / (239) 825-7230 / Fax (239) 234-6096 /Email: karenbishop@pmsnaples.com
August 8, 2024
Intake Team
Collier County Development Services
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
RE: Rezone Request PL20230016891 for Armantrout Acres
Intake Team:
This request is to rezone a parcel to restore the three lots previously allowed prior to the combining
of the parcels to accommodate a garage as an accessory structure, The original lots were non-
conforming single family lots under the AG designation. This request is for RSF-1 keeping the density
and creating conforming lots.
Please accept our submittal of the following items:
• Cover Letter/Project Narrative for Rezone application
• Master plan/ Preliminary Plat
• Addressing Checklist
• Boundary Survey
• Environmental report
• Property ownership disclosure form
• Affidavit of Authorization
• Warranty Deeds
• Aerial Photo
If there are any questions, please call me. 239-825-7230.
Respectfully,
Karen Bishop
Page 5020 of 5243
Standard Rezone Application (RZ) 4/10/24 Page 1 of 8
Planning and Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400
www.colliercountyfl.gov
Need Help?
GMCD Public Portal
Online Payment
Guide
E-Permitting Guides
Name of Property Owner(s):
Name of Applicant, if different than owner:
Address: City: State: ZIP:
Telephone: Cell:
E-Mail Address:
Name of Agent:
Firm:
Address:City: State: ZIP:
Telephone:Cell:
E-Mail Address:
Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application, if space is
inadequate, attach on separate page:
•If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a
separate legal description for property involved in each district;
•The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months,
maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and
•The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise
concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required.
Section/Township/Range: / /
Lot: Block: Subdivision:
Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number:
Size of Property: ft. x ft. = Total Sq. Ft. Acres:
Address/ General Location of Subject Property:
STANDARD REZONE APPLICATION (RZ)
LDC Section 10.02.08
Chapter 3 H. of the Administrative Code
PROPERTY INFORMATION
APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION
Page 5021 of 5243
Standard Rezone Application (RZ) 4/10/24 Page 2 of 8
Zoning Land Use
N
S
E
W
If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal
description of the entire contiguous property: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page)
Section/Township/Range: / /
Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number:
Lot: Block: Subdivision:
Metes & Bounds Description:
This application is requesting a rezone from:
Zoning district(s) to the zoning district(s).
Present Use of the Property:
Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the subject property:
REZONE REQUEST
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE
BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY
AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS.
Page 5022 of 5243
Standard Rezone Application (RZ) 4/10/24 Page 3 of 8
Complete the following for all registered Home Owner / Civic Association(s) that could be affected by
this petition and located within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Provide additional sheets if
necessary. Information can be found on the Civic Associations and Communities page on the Board
of County Commissioner’s website. Applicant is responsible for and shall confirm the current mailing
addresses for each association as registered by the Florida Department of State, Division of
Corporations.
Name of Homeowner Association:
Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP:
Name of Homeowner Association:
Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP:
Name of Homeowner Association:
Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP:
Name of Homeowner Association:
Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP:
Name of Homeowner Association:
Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP:
Pursuant to LDC section 10.02.08, staff’s recommendation to the Planning Commission and the
Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon
consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, please
provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria
noted below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request.
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, future
land use map and elements of the Growth Management Plan.
2. The existing land use pattern.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on
the property for the proposed change.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment
(rezone) when necessary.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create
ASSOCIATIONS
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Page 5023 of 5243
Standard Rezone Application (RZ) 4/10/24 Page 4 of 8
types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or
projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the
development, or otherwise affect public safety.
8.Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
9.Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
10.Whether the proposed change will seriously affect property values in the adjacent area.
11.Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
12.Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner
as contrasted with the public welfare.
13.Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with
existing zoning.
14.Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
county.
15.Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in
districts already permitting such use.
16.The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be
required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the
proposed zoning classification.
17.The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services
consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan
and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities
Ordinance [Code Ch. 106, art. II], as amended].
18.Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the board of county commissioners shall deem
important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare.
Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many
communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners
association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the
request is affected by existing deed restrictions.
Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been
held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing?
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official
interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year?
Yes No If so, please provide copies.
Page 5024 of 5243
Standard Rezone Application (RZ) 4/10/24 Page 5 of 8
STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR STANDARDREZONE REQUEST
Name of Applicant(s):
Address: City: State: ZIP:
Telephone: Cell:
E-Mail Address:
Address of Subject Property (If available):
City: State:ZIP:
Section/Township/Range: / /
Lot: Block: Subdivision:
Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number:
Metes & Bounds Description:
Check applicable system:
a.County Utility System
b.City Utility System
c.Franchised Utility System Provide Name: ____________________________
d.Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity):_____________________________
e. Septic System
a.County Utility System
b.City Utility System
c.Franchised Utility System Provide Name:_____________________________
d.Private System (Well)
Total Population to be Served: __________________________________
Peak and Average Daily Demands:
A.Water-Peak:Average Daily:
B.Sewer-Peak:Average Daily:
If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date
service is expected to be required:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED
TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED
APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION
Page 5025 of 5243
Standard Rezone Application (RZ) 4/10/24 Page 6 of 8
Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of
sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent
and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall
be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer.
Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of
Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate
the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County
Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all
applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that
the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities
Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall
contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer
systems.
Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at
the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any
provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve
the project shall be provided.
This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3
H.of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit
a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8
of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS
Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing
advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the
Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately.
Page 5026 of 5243
Design Criteria:
Residential
Population per Unit = 2.5/unit
Units (Residences) = 5 units
Collier County Per Capita Sewer Flow = 100 gpd per person
Equivalent Population (EP) = Total Average Daily Flow / 100 gpdpc =12.5 people
Peak Factor = 18 + (P)1/2
4 + (P)1/2
P=0.013 (Equivalent Population / 1000)
Peak Factor = 4.40
GPD GPM GPD GPH GPM
Residences 5 2.5 12.5 100 1250 0.87 5506 229.4 3.8
1250 0.87 5506 229.4 3.8
Design Criteria:Potable Water Average Day Demands =Average Daily Flow (Sewer) x 1.4 per 2021 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR)
Potable Water Maximum Day Demand = Average Day Demands x 1.3 per Collier County Design Criteria 2.2.1 C
Equivalent Population (EP) = Total Potable Average Daily Demand / 100 gpdpc
Potable Peak hour factor is from 10 States Standards (Fig 1, page 10-6) and is based on equivalent population
(18+(EP/1000)^0.5)/(4+(EP/1000)^0.5)
1.40
1750 GPD 1.22 GPM
1.30
Max Day Demand = 2275.0 GPD 1.58 GPM
Equivalent Population = 12.5 People
Peak Hour Factor = 4.40
Peak Hour Demand = 7708.5 GPD 5.35 GPM
Max Day Demand Factor
Average Daily Demand =
Average Daily Demand Factor
Average Daily Flow Peak Hour Flow
Water Demand:
WATER DEMAND
Residential
TOTALS
Potable Water Demand & Sanitary Sewer Flows for Statement of Utility Provisions
3498 Sunset Blvd - PUD Rezone Request
Sewer Flows:
Type of Unit Number
of Units
Population
per Unit
Total
Population
Flow Per
Capita
(GPD)
PROPOSED SEWER FLOWS
*100 gal/day per person and 2.5 people per household = 250 GPD per residential unit per Collier
County Design Criteria, Part 2 "Wastewater Collection and Transmission Systems"
Page 5027 of 5243
Standard Rezone Application (RZ) 4/10/24 Page 7 of 8
The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time
of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the
application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets
attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted.
REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW Required
Not
Required
Completed Application (download current form from County website)
Pre-Application meeting notes
Project Narrative
Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized
Completed Addressing Checklist
Property Ownership Disclosure Form
Utility Provisions Statement with sketches
Signed and Sealed Survey
Conceptual Site Plan
Architectural Rendering
Warranty Deeds
Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00
Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous
surveys
Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project
boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial.
Historical Survey or waiver request
Traffic Impact Statement, with applicable fees
School Impact Analysis Application – residential projects only
Electronic copy of all documents and plans
If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas, pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.(2).(b). i.c.,
the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3500 for information regarding “Wildfire Mitigation &
Prevention Plan.”
Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for:
Standard Rezone
Chapter 3 H. of the Administrative Code
Page 5028 of 5243
Karen Bishop
8/8/24
$6000. +$150.25 + $750. + $1,125. + $500. + $500. = $9025.25 -
$500 = $8,525.25
Page 5029 of 5243
Page 1 of 5
Armantrout Acres Rezone PL20230016891
Evaluation Criteria
LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F state, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and
recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners
required… shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed
change in relation to the following findings, when applicable”:
The subject is a +/- 5.28 acre property located at 3499 Sunset Boulevard, Naples, FL.
Specifically, the property is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Sunset Blvd.
and Whitaker Drive. The purpose of this rezone from Agriculture (A) to Residential Single
Family-minimum one acre (RSF-1) to allow the platting of three (3) lots. Based on the acreage
the rezone would allow up to five (5) lots however that is not the intent of the applicant/owner.
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies,
future land use map and elements of the Growth Management Plan (GMP).
The proposed RSF-1 rezoning is consistent with the GMP goals, objectives, and policies as
follows.
Future Land Use Element:
The Future Land Use Category (FLUC) for the subject property is Urban Mixed-Use District,
Urban Residential Subdistrict which allows a base density of four (4) units per acre. However,
the ultimate intent is to revert the parcel back to three (3) lots. The proposed residential use is
consistent with this FLUC.
Policy 5.6 requires new developments to be compatible with and complementary to the
surrounding land uses. The request is to allow single-family lots meeting the minimum of one (1)
acre per the RSF-1 zoning district which is consistent with the FLUC. The LDC defines
Compatibility as “a condition in which land uses or conditions can coexist in relative proximity
to each other in a stable fashion over time such that no use or condition is unduly negatively
impacted directly or indirectly by another use or condition.” In order to ensure compatibility and
consistency with the surrounding area the property will maintain the two existing single family
residences and only add one more for a total of three (3) lots. In addition, the required buffers
along the rights-of-way and existing perimeter property lines will be provided. These provisions
will ensure the single family uses meet the intent of the definition of compatibility. These
provisions are over and above what the surrounding single family residences were required to
provide.
Page 5030 of 5243
Page 2 of 5
Objective 7 and implementing policies 7.1 through 7.4, encourage smart growth policies by
promoting connectivity between developments. The subject property is surrounded by two local
streets and developed and undeveloped properties under separate ownership making it infeasible
to interconnect. This is not a PUD zoning that would be designed to provide internal
interconnectivity. This condition is similar to many of the areawide single family parcels that do
not provide interconnection except via the local roadway system.
Public Facilities Element:
The project is within the service area of the Collier County Water-Sewer District’s (CCWSD)
regional potable water system and the South County Water Reclamation Facility. Potable water
is available and will be extended to the site. Septic tanks will provide the necessary wastewater
treatment. Adequate capacity will be determined at time of construction plans review.
Transportation Element:
Policy 1.3 requires that acceptable levels of service for arterial and collector roadways shall be
maintained. The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIS) prepared in support of this application
demonstrates that available capacity exists on the surrounding collector and arterial roadways.
The TIS specifically concluded: “Based upon the findings of this report, it was determined that
the proposed Lot Split for the property referred to as Armantrout Land will not have a significant
or a negative impact upon the surrounding road network. In fact, the project will have a de
minim.is impact on the adjacent road network (i.e., less than a 1 % impact on any road's adopted
capacity standard). It was verified that all roadways, within the project's area of impact, currently
have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the traffic associated with the proposed three
(3) single-family dwelling units. As determined, the road network will continue to operate at
acceptable levels of service for the foreseeable future and the project will not create any off-site
transportation deficiencies that need to be mitigated.”
Conservation and Coastal Management Element:
Policy 6.1.1 establishes native vegetation preservation standards for the County. Pursuant to the
Environmental assessment the subject property does contain native vegetation primarily along
the boundaries of the property that is shown in a preliminary lot layout. There are no wetlands
onsite. Preservation of native vegetation will be determined during the platting/construction
plans process.
2. The existing land use pattern.
The subject property is located on Sunset Boulevard and Whitaker Road. The surrounding
properties to the North, South, and East of the property are zoned Agriculture and various
RPUDs. The surrounding agriculture lots vary from ¾ acres to five (5) + acres most of which do
not meet the minimum five (5) acre requirement for Agriculture zoning. Some of the RPUDs in
Page 5031 of 5243
Page 3 of 5
the area have densities that range from 4 to 10 units per acre. Immediately west of the subject
property is the approved Santa Barbara -Whitaker Residential Planned development. That RPUD
is approved for 216 multifamily residential dwelling units (± 10 dwellings units per acre
(DU/ac)). The mix of densities and types of residential uses in the area represent an area in
transition which supports the proposed rezoning to RSF-1.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts.
The property is in a transitional area that includes residential parcels as small as +/- .72 acres
zoned Agriculture and Residential Planned Developments with a mix of uses and lots sizes. The
requested rezone is consistent with these surrounding residential uses.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property for the proposed change.
The existing district boundary is illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the
property. The purpose of this rezone is to allow the property owner to plat the property into three
(3) conforming lots for the existing two residences and to establish an additional lot for another
family member. This will allow the existing and future residences to make improvements while
meeting the County regulations.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment
(rezone) necessary.
The property is currently developed with two existing residences with various accessory
structures creating a nonconforming status in the current agriculture zoning district. Rezoning the
subject property to RSF-1 will allow the applicant to create three (3) conforming homesteads for
their immediate family.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
By creating individual residential homesteads, the proposed rezoning will be consistent with the
living conditions in the neighborhood. The surrounding area has urban infrastructure including
water and sewer availability. The resulting subdivision will have a maximum of three (3) single
family homes and will be of similar scale to other development which has been developed in the
Whitaker drive area.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak
volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction
phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety.
The requested change will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of
traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses or otherwise affect public safety. The TIS
Page 5032 of 5243
Page 4 of 5
report states, “it was determined that the proposed Lot Split for the property referred to as
Armantrout Land will not have a significant or a negative impact upon the surrounding road
network. In fact, the project will have minimum impact on the adjacent road network (i.e., less
than a 1% impact on any road's adopted capacity standard). It was verified that all roadways,
within the project's area of impact, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the
traffic associated with the proposed three (3) single-family dwelling units. As determined, the
road network will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service for the foreseeable future
and the project will not create any off-site transportation deficiencies that need to be mitigated.”
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
The proposed amendment does not anticipate creating adverse drainage impacts in the area. The
site currently sheet flows to an adjacent ditch on the corner of Whittaker Road and Sunset
Boulevard, the proposed zoning will not change the drainage conditions.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
The development standards and perimeter buffers ensure that the proposed change will not impact
the adjacent areas. The proposed RSF-1 zoning district and the agriculture zoning district both have
a maximum height allowed of thirty-five (35) ft. which ensures light and air conditions will be
consistent.
10. Whether the proposed change will seriously affect property values in the adjacent area.
The proposed change will not adversely affect property values in the adjacent area because the
intent is to maintain the existing single-family product and add one more all of which are similar to
the adjacent development.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
This proposed change will not impact the rights of the adjacent properties to make improvements
and/or develop their properties as long as they meet the applicable regulations.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
The proposed change does not grant any special privilege as contrasted with the public welfare.
The proposed rezone will bring the existing development into compliance with the current
regulations by allowing the applicant to formally plat three parcels. Other owners have the right
to pursue the same zoning and development plans.
Page 5033 of 5243
Page 5 of 5
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance
with existing zoning.
Currently the two residences and accessory structures are not in compliance with the agriculture
zoning district which requires a minimum of five (5) acres per residence. Any redevelopment or
new development would not be permitted due to this nonconformity.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
county.
The proposed zoning change conforms with the neighborhood. The neighboring lots currently sit
in an Agricultural zone and PUD districts. The proposed zoning change that allows single family
residences will be consistent with the scale of the neighborhood and zoning districts.
15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use
in districts already permitting such use.
There are other areas that allow for single family residences, but the property owner would have
to purchase a new parcel and build a new residence creating an unnecessary financial hardship.
Allowing this request would allow the property owner to keep his existing residence and provide
another opportunity for his family to build another home next door.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which
would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under
the proposed zoning classification.
There will be minimal site alterations as a result of this proposed zoning since the property will
continue to be utilized for single family uses.
17.The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services
consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management
Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public
Facilities Ordinance [Code Ch. 106, art. II], as amended].
Currently the existing two homes are served by onsite well and septic systems. Future connection
to public facilities will be addressed after the rezone is approved.
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the board of county commissioners shall
deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare.
The proposed zoning will bring the existing single family development into conformance with
County regulations by allowing the property owner to plat three lots in conformance with the
RSF-1 zoning regulations and allow the existing residences to make any necessary improvements
that would further protect the public health, safety, and welfare. For example, if the existing
residences were impacted by the recent hurricanes, they technically would not be able to make
any improvements due to the nonconformity status.
Page 5034 of 5243
Page 5035 of 5243
Page 5036 of 5243
Page 5037 of 5243
Page 5038 of 5243
Page 5039 of 5243
Page 5040 of 5243
Page 5041 of 5243
Page 5042 of 5243
Page 5043 of 5243
Page 5044 of 5243
Page 5045 of 5243
Page 5046 of 5243
Page 5047 of 5243
K:\2024\24-0033 Armantrout\Correspondences\Documents\Rezone - NIM\Compliance\Cover Letter.docx
January 10, 2025
The Intake Team Via E-Permitting
Collier County Growth Management Division
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Re: PL20230016891 – Armantrout Land (Rezone)
Neighborhood Information Meeting Compliance
Dear Intake Team:
Attached to this cover letter are the following documents in accordance with Collier County’s
Neighborhood Information Meeting requirements:
• Affidavit of Compliance
• Neighborhood Information Meeting Advertisement as shown in the Naples Daily News
• Neighborhood Information Meeting Property Owner Letters
• Property Owner Mailing List
• Affidavit of Publication from the Naples Daily News (Gannett)
• Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary
• Neighborhood Information Meeting Sign-In Sheets
• PowerPoint Presentation (in PDF format)
• Recording of the Neighborhood Information Meeting (emailed separately)
If you have any questions, you may reach me by telephone or email at memblidge@lja.com.
Sincerely,
LJA ENGINEERING, INC.
Margaret Emblidge
Margaret E. Emblidge, AICP
Planning Director
MEB/drr
Enclosures
Page 5048 of 5243
Page 5049 of 5243
Page 5050 of 5243
Dear Property Owner:
Please be advised that a formal application has been submitted to Collier County seeking approval of a rezone under
PL20230016891. The applicant is petitioning Collier County to approve the rezoning of the property from
Agricultural to Residential Single Family RSF-1 to build two single family homes.
In compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting
will be held on Thursday, January 9, 2025, at 5:30 pm at the Collier County South Regional Library, Meeting
Room A, 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples, Florida 34113. (The Collier County Public Library does not
sponsor or endorse this program.)
Subject Property: Parcel No 00423560004
The subject property is located at 3498 Sunset Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34112.
The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an
impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is
that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly
progress of the meeting. At this meeting, the petitioner will explain the project in detail, record your input as an
interested neighbor and answer any questions you may have.
If you have any questions, comments or do not feel comfortable attending the meeting in person, you do have the
opportunity to participate virtually via an online Zoom meeting. Please note that remote participation is provided as
a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The petitioner and LJA Engineering are not responsible for technical issues. The
link and passcode for the online zoom meeting are shown below.
Zoom Meeting Link: https://lja.zoom.us/j/84053970435?pwd=Azae35ReNo2SjEPOrR31s6lXS5255a.1
Meeting ID: 840 5397 0435
Passcode: 427733
LJA ENGINEERING, INC.
7400 Trail Boulevard, Suite 200
Margaret Emblidge Naples, FL 34108
Telephone: (239) 597-3111
Margaret Emblidge, AICP Email: memblidge@lja.com
Planning Director
Page 5051 of 5243
1
NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME6
BEATY, ALLEN J & SHARON M PO BOX 31 COLUMBUS, MT 59019
BLOOM, JAMES & SAMANTHA 6072 POLLY AVE NAPLES, FL 34112
BOWERMAN III, JACK A & AMANDA % BIG ISLAND DEVELOPMENT OF NAPLES, INC.4601 ENTERPRISE AVE #1 NAPLES, FL 34104
COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104
EBY, DAN A & KAREN L EBY, CLINTON A=& JENNA MARIE 6150 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 34112-2966
FREDDIE & TAMMY SUE ARMANTROUT FAMILY TRUST 3499 SUNSET BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112
GONZALEZ, MADERLINE 6066 ADKINS AVE NAPLES, FL 34112-2979
GS NAPLES OWNER LLC 465 MEETING ST SUITE 500 CHARLESTON, SC 29403
GS NAPLES OWNER LLC 465 MEETING ST SUITE 500 CHARLESTON, SC 29403
GS NAPLES OWNER LLCC 465 MEETING ST SUITE 500 CHARLESTON, SC 29403
HARRIS, BERNADINE 6142 ADKINS AVE NAPLES, FL 34112-2948
LAKE & WETLAND MANAGEMENT-WEST COAST INC.938 TROPIC BLVD DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483
MCCANDLESS, JOHN C 6134 ADKINS AVE NAPLES, FL 34112-2948
MICHAEL C LEE REV TRUST 6120 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 34102
MICHAEL C LEE REV TRUST 6120 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 34102
MICHAEL C LEE REVOCABLE TRUST 6120 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 34102
ROGER L LEMLEY DEC OF TRUST JETTA C LEMLEY DEC OF TRUST 1429 SAN MARCOS BLVD NAPLES, FL 34104
SANTIAGO-RAMIREZ, DORISELBA 6143 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 34112-2967
SCHOESSEL, JUSTIN & ELIZABETH 6100 ADKINS AVE NAPLES, FL 34112
WILLIS, PAUL & LAUREN 6184 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 34112
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES AREA CIVIC ASSOCIATION, INC.2631 4th STREET NW NAPLES, FL 34120
Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The
recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA.
Petition: PL20230016891 | Buffer: 500' | Date: 12/10/2024 | Site Location: 00423560004
ARMANTROUT LAND REZONE - NIM
POList_500 Page 5052 of 5243
Page 5053 of 5243
Page 5054 of 5243
Date: January 9, 2025
To: Tim Finn, Collier County
From: Margaret Emblidge, AICP, Planning Director
Re: Neighborhood Information Meeting
RZ-PL20230016891; Armantrout Land
Meeting Summary
The Neighborhood Information Meeting for RZ-PL20230016891 – Armantrout Land was held on
Thursday, January 9, 2025, at 5:30 PM at the Collier County South Regional Library located at 8065 Lely
Cultural Parkway, Naples, Florida 34113.
There were no attendees from the public, so a presentation was not provided. Meeting was ended at 5:45pm.
All attendees included the Project Team and County Reviewers as listed below:
Fred & Tammy Armantrout, Applicant/Owner
Jesus Fernandez, Jr., Contractor
Michael Fernandez, Contractor
Karen Bishop, PMS Inc. of Naples
Margaret Emblidge, AICP, Planning Director, LJA Engineering
Elise Wilcox, LJA Engineering, Inc.
Edwin Garcia, Planner, LJA Engineering, Inc.
Ray Bellows, Collier County Planner
Tim Finn, Collier County Planner
The sign-in sheets are attached.
The PowerPoint is included in this submittal.
Margaret Emblidge, AICP
Planning Director
LJA Engineering, Inc.
memblidge@lja.com
(239) 597-3111
Page 5055 of 5243
Page 5056 of 5243
ARMANTROUT LAND REZONE
PL20230016891
January 09, 2025, Neighborhood Information Meeting
Page 5057 of 5243
ARMANTROUT LAND REZONE PLANNING TEAM
Applicant and Owner: Freddie Armantrout/Freddie E & Tammie S Family Trust
Land Use Attorney: Rich Yovanovich, Esq. – Coleman Yovanovich Koester
Project Manager: Karen Bishop – PMS, Inc. of Naples
Land Use Planner: Margaret Emblidge, AICP - LJA, Engineering, Inc.
Project Engineer: Jim Carr, P.E. - LJA, Engineering, Inc.
Environmental: Tim Hall – Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.
Transportation Engineer: Jim Banks – JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc.
Page 5058 of 5243
LOCATION MAP
SAN
T
A
B
A
R
B
A
R
A
B
L
V
D
.
SUNSE
T
BLVD.
WHITAKER R
D.ADKINS AVE.SANTA BARBARA-WHITAKER RPUD.
Page 5059 of 5243
PROJECT REQUEST
The subject property is +/- 5.28 acres and is located at the corner of Sunset Boulevard
and Whitaker Drive.
The applicant is proposing to rezone from Agriculture (A) to Residential Single Family -
minimum one-acre (RSF-1) to allow the platting of three (3) lots.
Based on the acreage the rezone would allow up to five (5) lots, however, that is not the
intent of the applicant/owner.
Page 5060 of 5243
ZONING MAP
Page 5061 of 5243
EXISTING GROWTH MANAGEMENT LAND USE
DESIGNATION
The subject property is designated as Urban Residential Subdistrict by the Collier County
Growth Management Plan which allows a base density of four (4) units per acre.
The ultimate intent is to create three (3) parcels with one single family residence per parcel.
This is consistent with the Urban Residential Subdistrict.
Page 5062 of 5243
FUTURE LAND USE MAP
Subject
Site
Page 5063 of 5243
CONCLUSION
The request to rezone to RSF-1 is consistent with the Growth Management Plan
and the Rezone Criteria pursuant to LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F.
In addition, the request is consistent with the surrounding residential properties.
Page 5064 of 5243
Final Staff Review
Public Hearings: Planning Commission and County Commissioners meetings.
Contacts: Margaret Emblidge, AICPmemblidge@lja.com239.597.311
Tim Finn, AICPTimothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov239.252.4312
NEXT STEPS
Page 5065 of 5243
Page 5066 of 5243
Page 5067 of 5243
Page 5068 of 5243
Page 5069 of 5243
Page 5070 of 5243
Page 5071 of 5243
Page 5072 of 5243
Page 5073 of 5243
Page 5074 of 5243
Page 5075 of 5243
Page 5076 of 5243
Page 5077 of 5243
Page 5078 of 5243
Page 5079 of 5243
Page 5080 of 5243
Page 5081 of 5243
Page 5082 of 5243
Page 5083 of 5243
Page 5084 of 5243
Page 5085 of 5243
Page 5086 of 5243
Page 5087 of 5243
Page 5088 of 5243
Page 5089 of 5243
STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE: N 26.121466<> LONGITUDE: W -81.715177SITE ADDRESS:<> 3498 SUNSET BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24047.00 - 3498 sunset blvd\CAD\EIA\24047-EIA.dwg LOCATION MAP 5/20/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-20-2424047-16263498 SUNSET BLVDLOCATION MAP50-------------------01 OF 05COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF MEXICOGULF OF MEXICO8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTYPage 5090 of 5243
NESW0 100 200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24047.00 - 3498 sunset blvd\CAD\EIA\24047-EIA.dwg 2024 AERIAL 5/20/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-20-2424047-16263498 SUNSET BLVD2024 AERIAL50-------------------02 OF 05SITE ADDRESS:,3498 SUNSET BLVDNAPLES FL 34112
SUNSET BLVD
WHITAKER RDSANTA BARBARA BLVD
·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE"MM-DD-YYYYPage 5091 of 5243
NESW0 50 100200SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24047.00 - 3498 sunset blvd\CAD\EIA\24047-EIA.dwg FLUCFCS MAP 5/20/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-20-2424047-16263498 SUNSET BLVDFLUCFCS MAP50-------------------03 OF 05UPLAND (ACRES):WETLAND (ACRES):PROJECT (ACRES):5.285.280·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE"MM-DD-YYYYFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)120RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM DENSITY<TWO-FIVE DWELLING UNITS PERACRE>0.84140COMMERCIAL AND SERVICES3.17222FRUIT ORCHARDS0.08411PINE FLATWOODS0.14411 / 321E1PINE FLATWOODS/PALMETTO PRAIRIES(EXOTICS 0-25%)0.06414E2MESIC OAK (EXOTICS 25-50%)0.06414E3MESIC OAK (EXOTICS 50-75%)0.38414E4MESIC OAK (EXOTICS 75-100%)0.39414 / 321 MESIC OAK/PALMETTO PRAIRIES0.04421XERIC OAK0.02427E3LIVE OAK (EXOTICS 50-75%)0.04428CABBAGE PALM0.04428E4CABBAGE PALM (EXOTICS 75-100%)0.02TOTAL5.28140414E3414E4414E3421414E2427E3414E4414E3414E4222414E4120140414E4428411/321E1411414E3140414/321411222428E4PUMPSUNSET BLVD
WHITAKER RDPROPERTY BOUNDARYPage 5092 of 5243
NESW0 50 100200SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24047.00 - 3498 sunset blvd\CAD\EIA\24047-EIA.dwg SOILS MAP 5/20/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-20-2424047-16263498 SUNSET BLVDSOILS MAP50-------------------04 OF 05·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·SOIL DATA PROVIDED BY:1998 UNITED STATES DEPT OF AGRICULTURESOIL SURVEY OF COLLIER COUNTY AREA, FL"NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE"MM-DD-YYYYCODEDESCRIPTIONHYDRICACRES110BRYNWOOD FINE SAND-URBAN LANDCOMPLEXYES3.06128PINEDA FINE SAND, LIMESTONESUBSTRATUM-URBAN LAND COMPLEXYES2.22TOTAL5.28PROPERTY BOUNDARYSUNSET BLVD
WHITAKER RD128110Page 5093 of 5243
NESW0 50 100200SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24047.00 - 3498 sunset blvd\CAD\EIA\24047-EIA.dwg SPECIES MAP 5/20/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-20-2424047-16263498 SUNSET BLVDSPECIES MAP50-------------------05 OF 05·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE"MM-DD-YYYYTYPICAL TRANSECTSPECIES SIGHTING TYPE 1SPECIES SIGHTING TYPE 2SPECIES SIGHTING TYPE 3SPECIES SIGHTING TYPE 4SUNSET BLVD
WHITAKER RDPROPERTY BOUNDARYPage 5094 of 5243
Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 1 of 5
Planning and Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400
www.colliercountyfl.gov/
Need Help?
GMCD Public Portal
Online Payment Guide
E-Permitting Guides
SUBMITTAL DATE: _______________ ASSIGNED PLANNER: _________________________
PETITION NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH WAIVER:__________________________________
PROJECT NAME: ____________________________________________________________
LOCATION: (Common Description) _____________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
SUMMARY OF WAIVER REQUEST: _____________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
(Properties located within an area of Historical and Archaeological Probability but with a low
potential for historical/archaeological sites may petition the Growth Management
Community Development to waive the requirement for a Historical/Archaeological Survey
and Assessment. Once the waiver application has been submitted, it shall be reviewed and
acted upon within five (5) working days. The waiver request shall adequately demonstrate
that the area has low potential for historical/archaeological sites.)
WAIVER APPLICATION FROM REQUIRED HISTORICAL
AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT
LDC Subsection 2.03.07 E 2.j.
Page 5095 of 5243
Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 2 of 5
Name of Property Owner(s): ___ _____________________________________________
Name of Applicant if different than owner: _____________________________________
Address: ________________ City: __________________ State: ______ ZIP: ____________
Telephone: ________________Cell:________________
E-Mail Address: ________________________________
Name of Agent: _____________________________________________________________
Firm: ________________
Address: ________________ City: __________________ State: ______ ZIP: ____________
Telephone: ________________Cell:_________________
E-Mail Address: ________________________________
Property I.D. Number _____________________________________
Section/Township/Range: / /
Subdivision:____________________________________ Block:________ Lot:_________
Plat Book___________ Page # ____________
Metes & Bounds Description: ________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
If the applicant includes multiple contiguous parcels, the legal description may describe the
perimeter boundary of the total area, and need not describe each individual parcel, except
where different zoning requests are made on individual parcels. A boundary sketch is also
required. Collier County has the right to reject any legal description, which is not
sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property, and may require a certified survey or
boundary sketch to be submitted.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION
Page 5096 of 5243
Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 3 of 5
Size of Property:________ft. x ___________ft. Total Sq. ft. _________ Acres________
Width Along Roadway: ______________________ Depth:__________________________
Present Zoning Classification:_______________________________________ __________
Present Use of Property: _____________________________________________________
REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED NOT
REQUIRED
Cover Letter with narrative statement detailing the reason for the waiver
request
Completed application with required attachments (download latest version)
Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized
Property Ownership Disclosure Form
Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial.
Any other conditions in previously approved development order(s).
Other:
PROPERTY INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS
See Attached Survey
Page 5097 of 5243
Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 4 of 5
Note: This provision is to cover instances in which it is obvious that any archaeological or
historic resource that may have existed has been destroyed. Examples would be
evidence that a major building has been constructed on the site or that an area has
been excavated.
A. Waiver Request Justification.
1. Interpretation of Aerial Photograph _________________________________
2. Historical Land Use Description: ___________________________________
3. Land, cover, formation and vegetation description: _____________________
4. Other: ________________________________________________________
B. The County Manager or designee may deny a waiver, grant the waiver, or grant the
waiver with conditions. He shall be authorized to require examination of the site by an
accredited archaeologist where deemed appropriate. The applicant shall bear the cost
of such evaluation by an independent accredited archaeologist. The decision of the
County Manager or designee regarding the waiver request shall be provided to the
applicant in writing. In the event of a denial of the waiver request, written notice shall
be provided stating the reasons for such denial. Any party aggrieved by a decision of
the County Manager or designee regarding a waiver request may appeal to the
Preservation Board. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the Preservation Board
regarding a waiver request may appeal that decision to the Board of County
Commissioners.
WAIVER CRITERIA
Page 5098 of 5243
From:Miller, Marissa L.
To:Karen Bishop
Subject:RE: Section 16 Township 50 range 26
Date:Thursday, August 15, 2024 12:21:01 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
Map.pdf
Good afternoon Karen,
I have completed your search and there are no previously recorded resources within your requested areas. I have attached a map
for your reference. Let me know if you need anything else or if you have any questions. Have a great day!
This record search is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute a project review. This search only identifies resources recorded
at the Florida Master Site File and does NOT provide project approval from the Division of Historical Resources. Contact the Compliance and
Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333 for project review information.
Marissa Miller
Historic Data Analyst| Florida Master Site File| Bureau of Historic Preservation | Division of Historical Resources| Florida Department of
State | 500 South Bronough Street | Tallahassee, Florida 32399 | 850.245.6424| 1.800.847.7278 |Fax: 850.245.6439 | flheritage.com
From: Karen Bishop <karenbishop@pmsnaples.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2024 12:05 PM
To: FMSFILE <FMSFILE@dos.myflorida.com>
Subject: Section 16 Township 50 range 26
EMAIL RECEIVED FROM EXTERNAL SOURCE
The attachments/links in this message have been scanned by Proofpoint.
Greetings,
I am looking to see if you have any documented findings in the above location. My client has a couple of single homes
built in the mid 1970's. We are in the process of rezoning to add one more single family home. The area has been
impacted as per the attached areal shows.
Thank you in advance.
Karen Bishop
PMSInc. of Naples
3125 54th Terrace , Naples, Fl 34116
239-825-7230
karenbishop@pmsnaples.com
Page 5099 of 5243
Karen Bishop
Page 5100 of 5243
Page 5101 of 5243
NESW0 50 100200SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\24047.00 - 3498 sunset blvd\CAD\EIA\24047-EIA.dwg FLUCFCS MAP 5/20/2024THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-20-2424047-16263498 SUNSET BLVDFLUCFCS MAP50-------------------03 OF 05UPLAND (ACRES):WETLAND (ACRES):PROJECT (ACRES):5.285.280·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE"MM-DD-YYYYFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)120RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM DENSITY<TWO-FIVE DWELLING UNITS PERACRE>0.84140COMMERCIAL AND SERVICES3.17222FRUIT ORCHARDS0.08411PINE FLATWOODS0.14411 / 321E1PINE FLATWOODS/PALMETTO PRAIRIES(EXOTICS 0-25%)0.06414E2MESIC OAK (EXOTICS 25-50%)0.06414E3MESIC OAK (EXOTICS 50-75%)0.38414E4MESIC OAK (EXOTICS 75-100%)0.39414 / 321 MESIC OAK/PALMETTO PRAIRIES0.04421XERIC OAK0.02427E3LIVE OAK (EXOTICS 50-75%)0.04428CABBAGE PALM0.04428E4CABBAGE PALM (EXOTICS 75-100%)0.02TOTAL5.28140414E3414E4414E3421414E2427E3414E4414E3414E4222414E4120140414E4428411/321E1411414E3140414/321411222428E4PUMPSUNSET BLVD
WHITAKER RDPROPERTY BOUNDARYPage 5102 of 5243
AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION
FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) _____________________________________________________________
I, _________________________________ (print name), as _______________________________ (title, if
applicable) of ______________________________________________ (company, If applicable), swear or affirm
under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner ____ applicant ___ contract purchaser ___ and that:
1.I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on
the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this
application and the Land Development Code;
2.All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter
attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true;
3.I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours
for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that
4.The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and
restrictions imposed by the approved action.
5.We/I authorize___________________________________________ to act as our/my representative
in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above.
*Notes:
•If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres.
•If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should
typically be signed by the Company’s “Managing Member.”
•If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership.
•If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the “general
partner” of the named partnership.
•If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee’s name and the words “as trustee”.
•In each instance, first determine the applicant’s status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then
use the appropriate format for that ownership.
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that
the facts stated in it are true.
Signature Date
STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of physical presence or online notarization this
____ day of _______________, 20___, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) __________________________________.
Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box:
Are personally known to me
Has produced a current drivers license ________________
Has produced ______________________ as identification.
Notary Signature: _______________________________________________
Notary Seal
CP\08-COA-00115\155
REV 3/4/2020
Page 5103 of 5243
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM
This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification
Letters.
Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the
date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the
applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form.
Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary.
a.If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in
common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the
percentage of such interest:
Name and Address % of Ownership
b.If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the
percentage of stock owned by each:
Name and Address % of Ownership
c.If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the
percentage of interest:
Name and Address % of Ownership
Page 5104 of 5243
d.If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the
general and/or limited partners:
Name and Address % of Ownership
e.If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation,
Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the
officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners:
Name and Address % of Ownership
Date of Contract: ___________
f.If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or
officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust:
Name and Address
g.Date subject property acquired _______________
Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months
If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following:
Page 5105 of 5243
Date of option: _________________________
Date option terminates: __________________, or
Anticipated closing date: ________________
AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form.
Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether
individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest-holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County
immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition’s final public hearing.
As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is
included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may
result in the delay of processing this petition.
____________________________________________ ____________
Agent/Owner Signature Date
____________________________________________
Agent/Owner Name (please print)
*The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to:
Growth Management Community Development Department | GMD Portal:
https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb
Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov
Page 5106 of 5243
Page 5107 of 5243
Page 5108 of 5243
Page 5109 of 5243
Page 5110 of 5243
Page 5111 of 5243
Page 5112 of 5243
Page 5113 of 5243
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners
(BCC) at 9:00 A.M. on May 13, 2025, in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, third floor, Collier
Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL, to consider:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS
FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE
APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF
THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING
DISTRICT TO THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DISTRICT-1 (RSF-1) ZONING DISTRICT TO
ALLOW UP TO THREE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM DENSITY OF UP
TO ONE DWELLING UNIT PER 1.74± ACRES ON 5.28± ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SUNSET BOULEVARD AND WHITAKER ROAD, AT 3498 SUNSET
BOULEVARD, IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (PL20230016891)
A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested
parties are invited to attend and be heard.
All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the
agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of an
Page 5114 of 5243
individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson
for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Written materials intended to be considered
by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of 7 days prior to the public hearing. All
materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record.
As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide
public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate
remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events
on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/calendar-of-events after the agenda is posted
on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting or any deadline specified within
the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing
how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s
risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call
Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.Willig@colliercountyfl.gov.
Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto
and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the
testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are
entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities
Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at
least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of
County Commissioners Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BURT L. SAUNDERS, CHAIRMAN
CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK
By: Yani Fernandez, Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)
Page 5115 of 5243