Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agenda 05/13/2025 Item #17E (Ordinance: Petition PUDZ-PL202300016622, Sainvilus Subdivision)
5/13/2025 Item # 17.E ID# 2025-1178 Executive Summary Recommendation to approve an ordinance rezoning 4.52± acres of the Residential Single-Family District-3 (RSF-3) zoning district with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4) to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4) to be known as Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD to allow up to 27 single family dwelling units on property located approximately 500 feet west of North 11th Street between Roberts Avenue West and Forrester Avenue in Immokalee. (PL20230016622) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (“Board”) review staff’s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above-referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property is located approximately 500 feet west of North 11th Street between Roberts Avenue West and Forrester Avenue in Immokalee, in Section 4, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 4.52+/- acres. This petition seeks to allow the rezoning from the Residential Single Family (RSF-3) Zoning District with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4) to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4) to be known as Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD to allow up to 27 single- family dwelling units. The subject property is comprised of four parcels owned by SAINVILUS LLC, James Sainvilus, Francesca Sainvilus, Jean Calixte Sainvilus, and Eliamene Sainvilus. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC, heard Petition PUDZ-PL20230016622, Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD, on April 3, 2025, and voted 7-0 to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval. There was one public attendee with design modifications pertaining to emergency evacuation access points; however, the agent declined as these modifications are not required by code. The public attendee also had concerns about there being no property management to maintain the property. The agent explained that there will be an HOA to maintain the property. It should be noted that these were only concerns and did not constitute an objection to the project. Moreover, the agent agreed to place a sidewalk along the western side of the PUD boundary, adjacent to the landscape buffer, during the SDP/plat review. This change was accepted by staff, and this revision was added to the Ordinance. As such, these concerns were resolved, and this petition will be placed on the Summary Agenda. RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC, which is reflected in the attached Ordinance and recommends that the Board approve the applicant’s request to rezone to the RPUD zoning district. This item advances the Collier County Strategic Plan Objective within Quality of Place to support and enhance the character of our community. FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Other fees collected prior to the issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The subject property is located within the Medium Residential Subdistrict (MR) of the Urban Mixed-Use District, as defined in the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP) and depicted on the Immokalee Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map (IAMP-FLUM). This designation allows for a mix of housing types and supporting uses, promoting the area's development and alignment with the broader goals of the IAMP. The IAMP focuses on creating a balanced mix of residential uses to support community growth and sustainability. Page 5116 of 5243 5/13/2025 Item # 17.E ID# 2025-1178 The proposed Sainvilus Subdivision consists of 26 single-family attached zero-lot-line dwellings, designed in a 'villa' style, and one single-family detached dwelling, totaling 27 dwelling units. This type of development is compatible with the MR Subdistrict, which allows for a range of housing types, including residential units of moderate density. The petition aligns with the allowable uses of the MR Subdistrict and contributes to achieving the objective of maintaining and developing cohesive neighborhood units, as set out in Objective 5.1 of the IAMP. The MR Subdistrict allows for residential density of up to six (6) dwelling units per gross acre. As the subject property is 4.52 acres in size, the IAMP would allow for a maximum of 27.12 dwelling units per acre. Based on this density calculation, the site can accommodate up to 27 units, which matches the proposed number of units in the Sainvilus Subdivision. As a result, the proposed density for this project is consistent with the maximum allowable density outlined in the IAMP. Further analysis is provided in the attached Consistency Memorandum, as shown in Attachment B - GMP Consistency Memo. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's August 21, 2024, Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP), using the 2024 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states: "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has a significant impact if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links, the project traffic is considered significant up to the point where it equals or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways." Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition, the proposed development is projected to generate a total of +/- 30 PM peak hour, two-way trips on the adjacent road network. The trips generated by this development will occur on the following adjacent roadway network links: Roadway/Link Link Current Peak Hour Peak Direction Volume/Peak Direction Projected P.M. Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Traffic (1) 2024 Level of Service (LOS) 2024 Remaining Capacity State Road SR-29/85 9th to CR- 29A North 900/SB 11/SB D 79 Lake Trafford Road/47 Carson Rd. to SR-29 800/EB 3/EB D 162 1. Based on the TIS supplied by the applicant, and the 2024 AUIR, the subject PUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Page 5117 of 5243 5/13/2025 Item # 17.E ID# 2025-1178 Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. The Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): The Environmental review staff have found this project to be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site has been cleared; no preservation is required. The project site is 4.52± acres. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding whether a finding is consistent or inconsistent with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a site specific rezone to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as the Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners, should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory, or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for PUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contracts, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed RPUD with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with RPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, future land use map, and the Growth Management Plan elements? 10. Will the proposed RPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested RPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion, create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? Page 5118 of 5243 5/13/2025 Item # 17.E ID# 2025-1178 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot (“reasonably”) be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a “core” question…) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed RPUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the RPUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners deem important in protecting public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons, and the oral testimony presented at the Board hearing as these items relate to these criteria. Should this item be denied, Florida Statutes section 125.022(3) requires the County to provide written notice to the applicant citing applicable portions of an ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority for the denial. This item is approved for form and legality and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. (DDP). RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve the request for Petition PUDZ - PL202300016622, Sainvilus Subdivision PREPARED BY: Timothy Finn, AICP, Planner III, Zoning Division ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report - Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD 2. Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance - revised 041625 3. Attachment B - GMP Consistency Memo 4. Attachment C - Application-Backup Materials 5. Attachment D - Hearing Advertising Signs 6. legal ad - agenda ID 25-1178 -PL20230016622-Sainvilus subdivision - 5.13.25 BCC Page 5119 of 5243 PUDZ-PL20230016622 Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD Page 1 of 16 Revised: March 20, 2025 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: APRIL 3, 2025 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20230016622; SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION (RPUD) ______________________________________________________________________________ Owner: SAINVILUS LLC James & Francesca L Jean Calixte & Eliamene Sainvilus 1215 Forrester Ave & 1300 Roberts Ave W Immokalee, FL 34142 Agent: Canon Sandora, PE Canon Sandora Civil Engineering, Inc. 9201 Tangelo Blvd Fort Myers, FL 33967 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider rezoning 4.52± acres from the Residential Single Family (RSF-3) Zoning District with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4) to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4) to be known as Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD to allow up to 27 single- family dwelling units. The subject property is comprised of four parcels owned by SAINVILUS LLC. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is situated approximately 500 feet west of North 11th Street, between Roberts Avenue West and Forrester Avenue, in Immokalee, Section 4, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. It consists of 4.52+/- acres (see the location map on page 2). Page 5120 of 5243 PUDZ-PL20230016622 Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD Page 2 of 16 Revised: March 20, 2025 Page 5121 of 5243 PUDZ-PL20230016622 Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD Page 3 of 16 Revised: March 20, 2025 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The site is comprised of four parcels identified as Parcel IDs #001275520007, 00127564005, 00121520003, and 00127565509. Most of the site is currently vacant, with an existing single- family dwelling unit fronting Roberts Avenue West. The proposed rezoning to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) is intended to allow development of the site with up to 27 single- family dwelling units, which calculates to a density of 6 units per acre. The PUD Master Plan depicts the majority of the site as consisting of detached single-family and attached single-family (zero-lot-line) homes. The main access point is depicted from Forrester Avenue, and three access points will provide access to the development from Roberts Avenue West, serving three single-family dwelling units. It should be noted that the existing single-family dwelling unit from Roberts Ave West will be removed at the time of Plat approval. A 0.82-acre stormwater management area is proposed between the three single-family dwelling units along Roberts Ave West and the remainder of the development to the north. The development will provide 2.71 acres of open space. The proposed maximum building height is 35 feet zoned/40 feet actual for principal structures. One deviation from the Land Development Code (LDC) is proposed to reduce the right-of-way width for local streets from 60 feet to 45 feet. Petitioners proposed Master Concept Plan. (Exhibit C of the Draft Ordinance attached to this staff report) Page 5122 of 5243 PUDZ-PL20230016622 Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD Page 4 of 16 Revised: March 20, 2025 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses, zoning classifications, and maximum approved densities for properties surrounding boundaries of Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD: North: Forrester Road, a local road, was developed with single-family residential properties, currently zoned as the Residential Single-Family (RSF-5) District. East: Developed with single-family residential, with a current zoning designation of Residential Single-Family (RSF-3) District South: Roberts Ave W, then developed with Immokalee Pioneer Museum at Roberts Ranch, with a current zoning designation of R. Roberts Estate MPUD that is approved for multi-family residential (8.78 du/ac), commercial, institutional, and office uses West: Developed with single-family residential fronting Forrester Ave and to the west is undeveloped with vacant residential land, with a current zoning designation of Residential Single-Family (RSF-3) District Source: Collier County Appraiser Page 5123 of 5243 PUDZ-PL20230016622 Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD Page 5 of 16 Revised: March 20, 2025 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is situated within the Medium Residential Subdistrict (MR) of the Urban Mixed-Use District, as outlined in the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP) and depicted on the Immokalee Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map (IAMP-FLUM). This designation provides for a mixture of housing types and supporting uses to increase the development of the area, ensuring alignment with the broader goals of the IAMP, which focuses on creating a balanced mix of residential uses to support community growth and sustainability. The proposed Sainvilus Subdivision consists of 26 single-family attached zero lot line dwellings, which are designed in a ‘villa’ style, and one single-family detached dwelling, totaling 27 dwelling units. This type of development is compatible with the MR subdistrict, which allows for a range of housing types, including residential units of moderate density. The petition aligns with the allowable uses of the MR subdistrict. It contributes to the fulfillment of the objective to maintain and develop cohesive neighborhood units, as set forth in Objective 5.1 of the IAMP. The MR subdistrict allows for residential density of up to six (6) dwelling units per gross acre. As the subject property is 4.52 acres in size, the IAMP would allow for a maximum of 27.12 dwelling units per acre. Based on this density calculation, the site can accommodate up to 27 units, which matches the proposed number of units in the Sainvilus Subdivision. As a result, the proposed density for this project is consistent with the maximum allowable density outlined in the IAMP. Further analysis is provided in the attached Consistency Memorandum, as shown in Attachment B - GMP Consistency Memo. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s August 21, 2024, Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2024 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: Page 5124 of 5243 PUDZ-PL20230016622 Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD Page 6 of 16 Revised: March 20, 2025 a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links, the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition, the proposed development will generate a projected total of +/- 30 PM peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent road network. The trips generated by this development will occur on the following adjacent roadway network links: Roadway/Link Link Current Peak Hour Peak Direction Volume/Peak Direction Projected P.M Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Traffic (1) 2024 Level of Service (LOS) 2024 Remaining Capacity State Road 29/85.0 9th to CR- 29A North 900/SB 11/SB D 79 Lake Trafford Road/47 Carson Rd. to SR-29 800/EB 3/EB D 162 1. Source for P.M. Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Traffic is August 21, 2024, Traffic Impact Statement provided by the petitioner. Based on the TIS provided by the applicant, the 2024 AUIR, the subject PUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site has been cleared; no preservation is required. The project site is 4.52 acres. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding the consistency or inconsistency of the proposed action with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. Page 5125 of 5243 PUDZ-PL20230016622 Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD Page 7 of 16 Revised: March 20, 2025 STAFF ANALYSIS: Applications to rezone to or to amend RPUDs shall be in the form of an RPUD Master Plan of development, along with a list of permitted and accessory uses and a development standards table. The RPUD application shall also include a list of developer commitments and any proposed deviations from the LDC. Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC’s recommendation. The CCPC uses the criteria above as the basis for its recommendation to the Board, which, in turn, uses these criteria to support its action on the rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below under the heading “Zoning Services Analysis.” In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the petition to address environmental concerns. The property has been developed and maintained clear of native vegetation required to be preserved. The Master Plan does not show a preserve since no minimum preservation is required. One gopher tortoise burrow was observed on the property, which will require a permit from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). Additionally, FWC wildlife data indicate the presence of a Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) in the area. A black bear management plan will need to be included in the PPL or SDP review. Finally, the property is located in the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay zone (ST/W-4) and must comply with groundwater protection requirements as outlined in LDC Section 3.06.12. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Utilities Review: Public Utilities staff did not review this petition as the property is not within the Collier County Water-Sewer District. Landscape Review: The applicant is not seeking any deviations related to landscaping. The buffers labeled on the Master Plan are in accordance with the Land Development Code. Stormwater Review: Stormwater Management Section staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) – The subject property is located within the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area. As such, the CRA serves as the primary vehicle for community and professional input on petitions. The agent presented the project at the CRA meeting on December 11, 2024. The project was heard again at the March 19, 2025, CRA Meeting, but did not have enough information to fully support the project and asked the agent to attend a future meeting to address their concerns to facilitate action on a letter of support. Page 5126 of 5243 PUDZ-PL20230016622 Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD Page 8 of 16 Revised: March 20, 2025 Zoning Services Review: Zoning Division staff has evaluated the proposed uses related to intensity and compatibility. The density of the proposed development is +6.0 units per acre (27 units/4.52 acres). The subject site is located within the Medium Residential Subdistrict of the Urban Mixed-Use District, as identified in the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP). The Medium Residential District allows for a variety of housing types, which would include the proposed detached and attached single-family units. Residential base density is allowable at up to six dwelling units per gross acre, and the petitioner complies with this base density allowance. Moreover, the property is within the boundaries of the Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area. The Urban Infill and Redevelopment Plan (Ord. 2000-17) encourages the revitalization and enhancement of the Immokalee community. This RPUD complies with the goal that it will revitalize the neighborhood through a comprehensive housing improvement project that will include the development or rehabilitation of single and multi-family structures and the installation of additional streetlights and sidewalks to increase safety in the area. To the north and east of the subject property are single-family dwellings. To the west is single- family residential and vacant residential land. To the immediate south are single-family homes, and across Roberts Ave West is the Immokalee Pioneer Museum at Roberts Ranch, which is county-owned. Below is a summary chart of the nearby zoning districts. Zoning District Future Land Use designation Density North: Residential Single- Family (RSF-5) District Medium Residential Subdistrict 5 dwelling units per acre East: Residential Single-Family (RSF-3) District Medium Residential Subdistrict 3 dwelling units per acre South: Residential Single- Family (RSF-3) District and then across from Roberts Ave West is zoned R. Roberts Estate MPUD Medium Residential Subdistrict and across from Roberts Ave West is Commercial Mixed- Use Subdistrict 3 dwelling units per acre and then south across from Roberts Ave West within the R. Roberts Estate MPUD, the density is 8.78 dwelling units per acre on Tract B (multi-family residential) West: Residential Single- Family (RSF-3) District Commercial Mixed- Use Subdistrict 3 dwelling units per acre Proposed Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD Medium Residential Subdistrict 6 dwelling units per acre Per LDC Section 4.07.02.E. governing PUDs, dimensional standards within any tract or increment of the proposed PUD shall conform to the minimum dimensional and other standards of the zoning district to which it most closely resembles in type, density, and intensity of use. Where there is uncertainty, the more restrictive standards shall apply. The zoning district that most closely resembles the detached and single-family tract for the Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD is the RSF-5 district. Standards for the RSF-5 district are compared below to the proposed standards for the Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD per the Development Standards Table I in Exhibit B of the draft Ordinance (Attachment A). Page 5127 of 5243 PUDZ-PL20230016622 Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD Page 9 of 16 Revised: March 20, 2025 The proposed Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD development standards are reduced from the most similar zoning district, which is RSF-5. Within the proposed Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD boundaries, the minimum PUD setback is 15 feet. The proposed heights have a zoned height of 35 feet and an actual building height of 40 feet. To the south, west, north, and east of the subject property, the structures have a maximum height of 35 feet. As such, the proposed heights within Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD are compatible with the immediate neighborhoods. As illustrated in the PUD Master Plan, a 10-foot-wide Type D Buffer is proposed along Forrester Avenue, a 15- foot Type B buffer is proposed along the western perimeter, a 15-foot-wide Type B buffer is along the eastern boundary, and a 10-foot-wide Type D Buffer is proposed along Roberts RSF-3 Standards LDC Sec. 4.02.01 RSF-5 Standards LDC Sec. 4.02.01 R. Roberts Estate MPUD – Tract B Proposed Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD – both detached and attached single-family Min. Lot Area – Single Family 10,000 s.f. 6,600 s.f. 1 acre 3,500 s.f. Min. Lot Width – Corner 95’ 70’ n/a n/a Min. Lot Width – Interior 80’ 60’ 150’ 45’ Min. Front Yard 30’ 25’ 25’ plus one foot for each two feet of building height over 30’ 23’ Min. Side Yard 7.5’ 7.5’ 7.5 feet plus one foot for each two feet of building height over 30’ 7.5’ – detached and 0/7.5’ attached Min. Rear Yard 25’ 20’ 25’ plus one foot for each two feet of building height over 30’ 17’ Maximum Height Principal – 35’ Accessory – 20’ Principal – 35’ Accessory – 20’ Principal – 30’ Accessory – 20’ Zoned – 35’ Actual – 40’ Page 5128 of 5243 PUDZ-PL20230016622 Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD Page 10 of 16 Revised: March 20, 2025 Avenue W. The 60% open space requirement will meet LDC requirements at 2.71 acres. As such, the landscaping buffers, open space, and preserves will provide natural transitions around and within the RPUD. The development standards will provide adequate setbacks, height limitations, and buffers to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, “In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08”: 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Water distribution and wastewater collection mains are available within this portion of the Immokalee Water and Sewer District franchise service area, and there is adequate water and wastewater treatment capacity to serve the proposed PUD. Moreover, stormwater management details related to flood protection, attenuation, floodplain compensation, conveyance, and treatment will be evaluated at the time of South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) and County Site Development Permit (SDP)/Plans and Plat Permit (PPL) permitting. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which the County Attorney’s Office reviewed, demonstrate unified control of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff have reviewed this petition and provided an analysis of its conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP, as outlined in the GMP Consistency section of this staff report. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Staff Analysis section of this staff report subsection Landscape Review, staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The buffer labels on the Master Plan are consistent with the LDC. Page 5129 of 5243 PUDZ-PL20230016622 Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD Page 11 of 16 Revised: March 20, 2025 5. The adequacy of existing and proposed usable open space areas to serve the development. The RPUD is required to provide at least 60% of the gross area for usable open space. No deviation from the open space requirement is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or platting. The 60% open space requirement will meet LDC requirements at 2.71 acres. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. As noted above, Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought, including, but not limited to, any plats and/or site development plans. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. According to the February 21, 2024, letter from the Immokalee Water & Sewer District, the plant has the capacity to provide water and sewer services to the project. (See Attachment C) 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations. One deviation is proposed in connection with this request to rezone to RPUD. Refer to the deviations section of the staff report, starting on page 14. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners…shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following when applicable”: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies outlined in the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. Page 5130 of 5243 PUDZ-PL20230016622 Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD Page 12 of 16 Revised: March 20, 2025 2. The existing land-use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The properties that abut the project to the east, north, south, and west allow for residential uses. Therefore, the proposed petition would not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. As shown on the zoning map included at the beginning of this report, the existing district boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed PUD zoning boundaries follow the property ownership boundaries. The zoning map on page 2 of the staff report illustrates the perimeter of the outer boundary of the subject parcel. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions necessitate the passage of the proposed rezoning. The proposed rezone is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. The petitioner believes that rezoning is necessary to accommodate housing construction. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed RPUD is not anticipated to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. As noted above, Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when seeking development approvals. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed RPUD request is not anticipated to create a stormwater management problem for the area. The site is not currently covered by a South Florida Water Page 5131 of 5243 PUDZ-PL20230016622 Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD Page 13 of 16 Revised: March 20, 2025 Management District (SFWMD) Environmental Resource Permit (ERP). However, this will be required prior to any proposed change in land use or development. That process will ensure consistency with all applicable state standards for stormwater systems. In addition, site development approval (SDP and/or Plat) will be required from Collier County to ensure that local development standards are maintained and that proposed stormwater system(s) are designed to be consistent with relevant LDC and County Ordinances for water quality and water quantity, during both the interim construction phase and final implementation. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated this RPUD would reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based on anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is influenced by a range of factors, including zoning; however, zoning alone may or may not impact values, as value determination is primarily driven by market forces. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The approval of the RPUD rezone request is unlikely to deter development activity in the surrounding properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. The proposed 27 single-family dwelling units, at six dwelling units per acre, are consistent with the Medium Residential Subdistrict of the IAMP, which constitutes a public policy statement supporting the development parameters as being appropriate. Consequently, the zoning action would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning to develop residential uses; however, the proposed uses and intensities cannot be achieved within the scope of this PUD rezoning action. Page 5132 of 5243 PUDZ-PL20230016622 Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD Page 14 of 16 Revised: March 20, 2025 14. Whether the suggested change is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. The subject site is located within the Medium Residential Subdistrict of the Urban Mixed-Use District, as identified in the Immokalee Area Master Plan. The Medium Residential District allows for a variety of housing types, which would include the proposed detached and attached single-family units. Residential base density is allowable at up to six dwelling units per gross acre, and the petition complies with this base density allowance. The surrounding properties to the north and east are also in the Medium Residential Subdistrict of the IAMP and would be governed by the same policies as the subject property. Compliance with the Medium Residential Subdistrict of the IAMP and implementation of enhanced development standards and commitments contribute to keeping in scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The site is partially developed, featuring an existing single-family dwelling that fronts Roberts Avenue West. The redevelopment will be evaluated in relation to all applicable federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, as well as later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services, consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. According to the February 21, 2024, letter from the Immokalee Water & Sewer District, the plant has the capacity to provide water and sewer services to the project. (See Attachment C) 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners (Board) shall deem important in the protection of public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking one deviation from the requirements of the LDC. The deviation is Page 5133 of 5243 PUDZ-PL20230016622 Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD Page 15 of 16 Revised: March 20, 2025 directly extracted from PUD Exhibit E. The petitioner’s rationale and staff analysis/recommendation are outlined below. Proposed Deviation #1: (Right-of-Way Width) “Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N Street System Requirements, which require a minimum local street right-of-way width of 60 feet, to allow a 45-foot right-of-way width for the internal streets, with a 10-foot public utility easement on both sides of the right-of- way.” Petitioner’s Justification: The proposed right-of-way is for a dead-end road which only serves the proposed PUD development. The proposed local road is 24 feet wide, with 5 foot sidewalks on either side, leaving 11 feet for open space within the proposed 45 foot right-of-way. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Similar deviations were approved for the Brandon, Argo Manatee, Rockedge, Vincent Acres, The Triad, and The MAC RPUDs; as such, staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community.” LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h states if the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on December 11, 2024, at CareerSource SWFL, located at 750 South 5th Street, Immokalee, FL. The meeting commenced at approximately 4:30 p.m. and concluded at 5:15 p.m. Canon Sandora, the agent, conducted the meeting, which included introductions to the consultant team and staff, followed by a presentation. The presentation consisted of an overview of the proposed RPUD rezoning application. Following the agent’s presentation, the meeting was opened to attendees, who could make comments and ask the consultant team questions regarding the proposed development. The concerns discussed were generational housing, housing affordability, drainage, and flooding. No commitments were made. A copy of the NIM Summary, sign-in sheet, and NIM presentation are included in Attachment C. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) REVIEW: This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Environmental Services staff recommend approval of the proposed petition. Page 5134 of 5243 PUDZ-PL20230016622 Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD Page 16 of 16 Revised: March 20, 2025 COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney’s Office reviewed this staff report on March 17, 2025. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: A) Proposed Ordinance B) GMP Consistency Memo C) Application/Backup Materials Page 5135 of 5243 ORDINANCE NO.2025 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COT]NTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.2OO4-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISTIED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING TIIE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED RXAL PROPERTY FROM THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DISTRICT-3 (RSF-3) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OYERLAY ZONE W-4 (ST^V-4) TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONE W-4 (ST/W-4) TO BE KNOWN AS SAINVILUS SUBDI\ISION RPUD TO AILOW UP TO 27 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON 4.52+ ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 5OO FEET WEST OF NORTH IITH STREET BETWEEN ROBERTS AVENUE WEST AND FORRESTER AVENUE IN IMMOKALEE, IN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFI,CTM DATE. (PL202300I6622) WHEREAS, Canon Sandora, P.E., ol Canon Sandora Civil Engineering, Inc., representing Sainvilus, LLC, James Sainvilus, Francesca Sainvilus, Jean Calixte Sainvilus, and Eliamene Sainvilus, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COT]NTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA that: SECTIONONE: ZoningClassification. The zoning classification of the herein described real property located Section 4, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from the Residential Single-Family District-3 (RSF-3) Zoning District with a wellfield Risk Management Speciat Treatment overlay Zone w-4 (sr/w-4) to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RpUD) Zoning District with a wellfield Risk Management Special rreatment overlay Zone w-4 124-CPS-02 s20 I I 927 2't 4 I I I 3 5 Sainvilus Subdivision (PUDZ) PL202300 | 6622 3t4/2025 Page I of2 CAOPage 5136 of 5243 (STAV-4) for a 4.52* acre parcel to be known as Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD in accordance with Exhibits A through F attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWC): Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majorit, vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this _ day of 2025. ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By Deputy Clerk Approved as to lorm and legality: Derek D- Perrv Assistant CounR Altomey Attachments: Exhibit A - Permitted Uses BOARD OF COLTNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COLTNTY, FLOzuDA By: Burt L. Saunders, Chairman Exhibit B - Development Standards ExhibitC-MasterPlan Exhibit D - Legal Description Exhibil E-1 - Deviations Exhibit E-2 - Typical R.O.W. Section Exhibit F - Developer Commitments 124-CPS-02520 I I 927 27 4 / I | 3 5 Sainvilus Subdivision (PUDZ) P L202300 t 6622 3 / 4 1202 5 Page 2 of 2 qo Page 5137 of 5243 EXHIBlT A IIST OF PERMITTED USES SAINV!LUS SUBDIVISION RPUD A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVETOPMENT Regulations for development of this PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document and all applicable sections of the Growth Management Plan (GMD), the Land Development Code (LDC), and the Administrative Code in effect at the time of approval of the Site Development Plan (SDP) or plat. Where the PUD ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provision of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable sh all apply. A maximum of 27 single-family dwelling units (6 units per acre) shall be permitted in this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, sh all be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1. Residential o Detached single-family units r Attached single-family units (zero lot line) 2. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board ofZoning Appeals (BZA) or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Customary accessory uses associated with the principal uses permitted in this PUD, including but not limited to garages, carports, swimming pools, spas, screen enclosures, sheds, utility buildings and infrastructure. 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas. Soinv il us Subdiv is ion P UDZ P L2 02 3 00 I 662 2 Febru(rry 27th. 2025 Page I of 11 CAO PERMITTED USES: A. Principal Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 2. Walls, berms, signage, and development excavations for stormwater drainage d ete nt io n/retent ion areas. Page 5138 of 5243 4. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. Sainvilus Subdivision PUDZ PL202300 t 6622 februory 271h,2025 Page2ofll C4uPage 5139 of 5243 EXHIBIT B IIST OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The standards for land uses within the development shall be as stated in these development standard tables. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. Table 1 below sets forth the development standards for the land uses within the Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD. TABTE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVETOPMENT STANDARDS DETACHED SINGTE FAMITY ATTACHED SINGTE FAMITY (ZERO rOT UNEI PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA 1500 sF 3,500 sF MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 45 FEET 45 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,000 sF MINIMUM FRONT YARD 23 FEET 23 FEET MINIMUM SIDE YARD 7.5 FEET o17.5 FEET MINIMUM REAR YARD 77 FEET L7 FEET MINIMUM EXTERNAL BOUNDARY SETBACK 15 FEET 15 FEET MINIMUM PRESERVE SETBACK N/A 10 FEET 10 FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHI ZONED ACTUAL 35 FEET 40 FEET 35 FEET 40 FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 20 FEET 20 FEET MINIMUM SIDE YARD 5 FEET 5 FEET MINIMUM REAR YARD 5 FEET 5 FEET MINIMUM PRESERVE SETBACK N/A MINIMUM EXTERNAL BOUNDARY SETBACK 15 FEET 15 FEET Maximum Height zoned Actual 35 FEET 40 FEEI 35 FEET 40 FEET Sainv ilus Subdiv is ion P U DZ P L2 02 3 00 I 662 2 February 27th, 2025 1,000 sF MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES MINIMUM FRONT YARD Page 3 of ll ,hr, Page 5140 of 5243 GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcelor lot boundary lines, or between structures. condominium, and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. Landscape buffers and lake maintenance easements shall be platted as separate tracts at time of subdivision plat approval. Note: Nothing in this PUD document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in a list of deviations, Exhibit E-1. S ainv ilus Subdivis ion P UDZ P L2 02 3 00 I 662 2 February 27th,2025 Page4ofll qo Page 5141 of 5243 EXHIBIT C MASTER PIAN Sainvilus Subdivision PUDZ PL202 300 I 6622 Februan 27th. 2025 Page5ofll qo Page 5142 of 5243 c!'c floc f c-sct!!v\u vtoa'3c-scoNoNvc lgaeerl'sal^lt -B o^l€ ot3gNvl tozs t0€!6 t lsNlct] volao'u io llvls 'cNt eNNSlNleNf-IAtC vuooNvs NoNva snthNtvs NOtStAloAnS :lJlaoad .I|aIHI] I I I I I ) .Y -L L C( L- I IL ,1 €CY J . : .l .--t .-.:.J- zotr3 ? -4\ =z _6 H3S>ai ?16:9t'o=a 6E-86t ei6 aEd 6< ErA Io t>>,,9fz?ln n= I t F6s I.5=;Eti 3:: g:;{ *EE:93E silE*EE " 3:EE;EH E irEHii; ";3 r>qi ?<6 Eie;1[ 6dU.-9,3i EE-[ -5 6.IirE ..-"-iE_ 1..,: =:z iEaY!i3io 66ll5YQH:tr gPjv!Y;: H :;iEli6E6, g!!;{E6E g EEg:gHE;qi 6!E*Ei6*6 !65+8EE+H EggCt!EC ":? n= z': o 646-1 2 ;;tt TP E o L zo FIlo () L!!)loz 5 I q I p3 =sY >2 -o n6 E -E"h:i si$H bi*6i;(,(o33d Ydoollvs NoNyJ a3ftl9Na -ff! l-T;-'l "l' Lt+ I! I rCY aI I t , _T t" I Page 5143 of 5243 EXHIBIT D LEGAT DESCRIPT!ON THE SOUTH 2O5.OO FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: THE SOUTHEAST % OF THE NORTHWEST % OF THE NORTHWEST % OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, EXCEPT THE EAST 45O.OO FEET AND THE SOUTH 23O,OO FEET. AND PARCEL tD # 00121520003 PARCEL 2 PARCEL tD # 0012756ss09 & 00127520007: THE WEST 210 FEET OF THE EAST 450 FEET OF THE SOUTH 660 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST % OF THE NORTHWEST % OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT.OF-WAY. LESS BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE WEST 210 FEET OF THE EAST 450 FEET OF THE SOUTH 660 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER (NW %) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER (NW %) THENCE NORTHERLY FOR 140.12 FEET TO AN EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG AN ExtSTtNG CHAIN LINK FENCE, FOR 270.52 FEET; THENCE sourHERLY, LEAVING sAlD cHAtN LINK FENCE FoR 126.17 FEET; THENCE wEsrERLy FoR 27o.oo FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 4.52 Totol Acres Sainvilus Stidivision PIJDZ PL202300 t 6622 PageTofll cao PARCEL tD # 00127564005: PARCEL 7 THE SOUTH 2JO' OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, EXCEPT THE EAST 450' THEREOF AND SUBJECT TO RIGHT OF WAY COUNTY ROAD OVER AND ALONG SOUTH 30 FEET. LYING AND BEING IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS THE WESTERLY 15 FEET THEREOF FOR UTILITY EASEMENT, THE WESTERLY 75 FEET OF THE SOUTH 230 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, SUBJECT TO RIGHT OF WAY OF COUNTY ROAD OVER AND ALONG THE SOUTH 30 FEET. Februory 271h, 2025 Page 5144 of 5243 EXHIB!T E-l LIST OF DEVIATIONS Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N Street System Requirements, which requires A minimum local street right-of-way width of 60 feet, to allow a 45 foot right-of- way width for the internal streets with a 10 foot public utiliry easement on both sides of the right-of-way, as depicted in Exhibit E-2. Soinv ilus Subdiv is ion P U DZ P L2 02 3 00 I 662 2 February 27'h.2025 Page 8 of 1l cao Page 5145 of 5243 ch'o 0!lfa5t{6tz),tor':fsc r!\ryv\ ,loc 3xc@NoNvc rt6ca 1! sa3!t ! o^ls ot39Nv-t t0a6 cm96 I fsttlSatl vot!o]! fo :tlv1s fd 'vrooNYs floN\,"1 .urrNrorl 'aNt 9NI!:l]NtCtl ltac vaooNvs NoNvc NOISIAloAnS ilcSaold r{oucls ssota z-l llalHxl Il/t LLo O L-r.l -o_]NII M/U ).IVM]CIS i,r t-l ^ <_) a>o-- Lr) tr)+lSvds Nldo ZO (J t-!-lU) =q E. ___l (-) o_ l-- TCL ;Lrr_ fLrl<aa> C\ =.Y io< O 0v0u d0Ed :Nr ul1Nl3 O u ta C\ tr)+lSvds Ntd0 )-]VM]CISLO rNt't M/l L-r--l_fo_ \ \ \ l.. C d L t \ ( Page 5146 of 5243 EXHIBIT F LIST OF DEVETOPMENT COMMITMENTS PURPOSE: The purposed of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of th is project. 1, GENERAL: A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is SAlNVlLUS, LLC and/or its successors assigns. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy ofa legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the ManaBing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not berelieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. B. lssuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. (Section 725.O22, FSI C. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 2. TRANSPORTATION: A. The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 29 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. B. A maximum of three units will access the development directly from Roberts Ave. West, as shown on the Master Concept Plan. The existing residential unit will be removed at time of Plat approval. Sainv ilus Subdiv ision P U DZ P L2 02 3 00 I 66 2 2 February 27'l', 2025 Page l0 of I I cao Page 5147 of 5243 3. LANDSCAPING: The PUD shall provide a buffers on all sides of development, as shown on the Master Concept Plan. The width of the sidewalk to be determined at the time of subsequent development order approval. 4. ENVIRONMENTAL: One gopher tortoise was found which will be removed, but no other listed or endangered species were found on the property. The site is mostly cleared. Therefore, no preserve area is necessary. 5. PUBLIC UTILITIES: Development in the PUD will be serviced by the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. Sainvilus Strbdivision PUDZ PL202 30016622 Februory 27'h, 2025 Page ll ofll qo Page 5148 of 5243 Growth Management Community Development • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • www.colliercountyfl.gov/ CONSISTENCY MEMORANDUM TO: Tim Finn, Planner III, Zoning Services FROM: Jessica Malloy, Planner II, Comprehensive Planning Growth Management Community Development Department DATE: March 7, 2025 SUBJECT: Sainvilus Subdivision (PUDZ) _________________________________________________________________________________ REQUEST: To change the zoning district of a property from Residential Single Family (RSF-3) to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD), allowing for development of a residential neighborhood of 27 dwelling units. LOCATION: The subject site is located in Immokalee, north of the R. Roberts Estate MPUD on Roberts Avenue West and south of Forrester Avenue. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property is located within the Medium Residential Subdistrict (MR) of the Urban Mixed-Use District, as defined in the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP) and depicted on the Immokalee Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map (IAMP-FLUM). This designation provides for a mixture of housing types and supporting uses to increase the development of the area, ensuring alignment with the broader goals of the IAMP, which focuses on creating a balanced mix of residential uses to support community growth and sustainability. The proposed Sainvilus Subdivision consists of 26 single-family attached zero lot line dwellings, which are designed in a ‘villa’ style, and 1 single-family detached dwelling, totaling 27 dwelling units. This type of development is compatible with the MR subdistrict, which allows for a range of housing types, including residential units of moderate density. The petition is aligned with the allowable uses of the MR subdistrict and contributes to the fulfillment of the objective to maintain and develop cohesive neighborhood units as set by Objective 5.1 of the IAMP. The MR subdistrict allows for residential density of up to six (6) dwelling units per gross acre. As the subject property is 4.52 acres in size, the IAMP would allow for a maximum of 27.12 dwelling units per acre. Based on this density calculation, the site can accommodate up to 27 units, which matches the proposed number of units in the Sainvilus Subdivision. As a result, the proposed density for this project is consistent with the maximum allowable density outlined in the IAMP. Certain applicable Future Land Use Element (FLUE) policies are shown as follows in italics followed by staff analysis in bracketed bold text. Page 5149 of 5243 Growth Management Community Development • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • www.colliercountyfl.gov/ FLUE Policy 5.6 (shown below in italics) followed by staff analysis in [bracketed bold text]. New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). [Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning staff as part of their review of the petition.] Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The proposed RPUD does not front a collector or arterial road. Roberts Avenue West and Forrester Avenue are both classified as rural local roads. Analysis of this policy would not be applicable to this site.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [The conceptual plan proposes three access points connecting to individual units on Roberts Avenue West. The remainder of the units are accessed from Forrester Avenue. Additional traffic signals would not be feasible nor necessary.] Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [The surrounding development of the site is a vacant 3.28-acre parcel to the east and improved single-family lots on all other boundaries. Future interconnection with the adjacent site on the eastern boundary will be considered at the time of its development.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [The site is designed to provide a moderate level of density consistent with the Medium Residential subdistrict and features connected sidewalks throughout the development along the roadway. No common areas nor civic facilities are proposed. The primarily attached dwellings offer a range in housing types to the Immokalee community by providing multi-generational housing to encourage long-term housing stability.] CONCLUSION: Based on the above analysis, staff finds the subject petition consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. PETITION ON CITYVIEW Page 5150 of 5243 Canon Sandora, PE Canon Sandora, PE Canon Sandora Civil Engineering, Inc. Page 5151 of 5243 & 00127565509 (Single-family attached) (one existing single family house to remain) Page 5152 of 5243 Page 5153 of 5243 Page 5154 of 5243 Page 5155 of 5243 Canon Sandora, PE - Canon Sandora Civil Engineering, Inc. & 00127565509 & 00121520003 Page 5156 of 5243 Page 5157 of 5243 Page 5158 of 5243 Page 5159 of 5243 X X X X Page 5160 of 5243 Page 5161 of 5243 Page 5162 of 5243 CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION PUDZ canon@cs-ce.com ∙ (239)-692-6738 ∙ 9201 Tangelo Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33967 Cover Letter with Narrative Statement The proposed project is a 4.4 acre residential planned unit development located at 1215 Forrester Ave. and 1300 Roberts Ave. W. in Immokalee, Florida. The owner is proposing a new, safe, hurricane resistant, residential development including a new road as well as drainage and utility infrastructure. The project proposes a total of 25 single-family homes, including one existing single-family home and 24 single-family zero lot line (attached by one common wall) homes. Key site features of the proposed Master Concept Plan and buildings include the following: Multi-story, +/-2,000 square foot, single-family houses. The proposed single-family attached homes are highly compatible with the surrounding areas single-family home land use. Landscape buffers are provided (see proposed Master Concept Plan). Lots very in size from 3,900+ square feet. Frontage for lots varies from 45+ feet. The maximum height will not exceed 35’ above the finished floor elevation. 45’ public right-of-way proposed ending in a cul-de-sac. This leaves space for a sidewalk and open space. Approximately 66% open space, which is adequate considering other residential developments in the county. No preserve is required because the site is mostly cleared (see environmental report). Since the land is mostly cleared and no protected species exist on the property, it is suitable for development. The proposed dry detention is approximately 12.5% of the site. Stormwater will drain to the detention area, and discharge will go into the swale along Forrester Ave. Utility connections will be proposed to connect into existing Immokalee Water and Sewer District gravity sewer and potable water on Forrester Ave. Immokalee Water and Sewer District has provided a statement confirming they will be able to provide their services to the development. Fire hydrants will also be added at a spacing no greater than 600 feet from each units. The local road, Forrester Ave., which the development is accessed from is suitable in terms of the additional traffic due to the additional 24 single-family attached homes. The proposed development conforms with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan, specifically the Immokalee Are Master Plan purpose for Medium Residential Subdistrict future land use to provide for a mixture of housing types. The number of units proposed in the development (25 total) is within the base density allowance of 6 units per acre, as the property is 4.4 acres allowing for 26 units. The proposed PUD conforms with PUD regulations, with the exception of LDC deviations which justifications are provided with this submittal. Evidence of unified control is provided in this submittal including a signed unified covenant of control form and sunbiz report for Sainvilus LLC. Page 5163 of 5243 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a.If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b.If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c.If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Page 5164 of 5243 d.If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e.If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ___________ f.If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g.Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Page 5165 of 5243 Date of option: _________________________ Date option terminates: __________________, or Anticipated closing date: ________________ AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest-holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition’s final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. ____________________________________________ ____________ Agent/Owner Signature Date ____________________________________________ Agent/Owner Name (please print) *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department | GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov Page 5166 of 5243 Page 5167 of 5243 Page 5168 of 5243 Page 5169 of 5243 Page 5170 of 5243 Page 5171 of 5243 Page 5172 of 5243 CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION PUD canon@cs-ce.com ∙ (239)-692-6738 ∙ 11500 Villa Grand #324, Fort Myers, FL 33913 Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary The Neighborhood Information Meeting for the Sainvilus Subdivision PUD was held on December 11 th , 2024 at 4:30pm at CareerSource SWFL located at 750 South 5th Street, Immokalee, FL, and also via Microsoft Teams. The meeting was advertised in The News-Press on November 24 th and invitations were mailed and received for all property owners within 500 feet more than 15 days in advance of the meeting (please see attached news ad and neighbor invitation letters for text). There were 12 people in attendance (see attached list). Three individuals presented information at the meeting: Architect, Willaim Glass, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP, and Civil Engineer, Canon Sandora, PE. Canon Sandora started off the meeting by introducing the project included the following information: The property is 4.52 acres including two addresses: 1300 Roberts Ave. W and 1215 Forrester Ave. The Future Land Use is Medium Density Residential Subdistrict which has a base density of 6 units/acre. 4.52 acres x 6 units/acre = 27 dwelling units Not proposing affordable housing density The owner is proposing 27 dwelling units, 26 single-family attached (zero lot line) and 1 detached single-family. The current zoning is RSF-3: 3 single-family units per acre, 10,000 SF min., 30 feet min. front setback, 7.5 feet sides setback, 20 feet rear setback, 80 foot width (interior lots), 95 foot min width (corner lots) Master Concept Plan features (see attached): Entrance coming off Forrester Ave., basically extending a dead-end. Some units access on Roberts Ave. W. Minimum lot sizes proposed: 84 foot width x 46.5 foot depth = 3,906 SF Minimum setbacks proposed 23 foot front, 15 foot rear, 7.5 one side Maximum 35 foot height Right-of-way proposed, with sidewalks on both sides. Project Architect William Glass shared the following information about the proposed units: 2,300 SF Units proposed Two-car garage units Multi-generational so mother and/or father can live downstairs Attached units share one common wall Attendees Questions and Comments: Why access on Forrester, instead of Roberts? Folks are comfortable with the fact that not a lot has been going on Forrester. Our response: The site lends itself to an access on Forrester, minimizing the amount of road needed, allowing for lots on either side of the road, and room for detention. Page 5173 of 5243 CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION PUD canon@cs-ce.com ∙ (239)-692-6738 ∙ 11500 Villa Grand #324, Fort Myers, FL 33913 Concerned that market rate housing is not affordable for a family. Concerned that a large amount of people are going to move into one unit. This will be become multi-family with multiple deeds to one unit. Garages will get converted to living space for more people to move in. Our response: The HOA documents will be specific not to allow this, and code violations will need to be enforced. Comment that this would give people an option to stay in Immokalee and increase property values. However, people may not like changes the developer will bring, and the owner has not communicated with neighbors. Our response: This project will bring up property values, and is positive for the neighborhood. Could the number of units be reduced? Our response: No bonus densities are proposed, so the density proposed are low compared to projects where the affordable housing bonus densities are proposed. People will pave their yards, causing drainage issues. Our response: That would be not be permitted for them to be. Privacy of neighbors impacted due to the units being proposed. Our response: Landscaping will be provided to create privacy. The project is needed, but not wanted by the neighbors. Page 5174 of 5243 Neighborhood Information Meeting Affidavit of Compliance I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance ?AA4-4L of the Collier Couaty Land DevelopmentCode, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisernent to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose mernbers may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezodng, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purpases of this requirement, the names and addresses af praperty owners shalt be deemed tkose appearing on the latest tax rolls qf Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the County to be rcoffied. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change aod the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Informaticn Meeting. Per the attached letters, proper(y owoer's list, and copy of oewspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Complianee ,4 '-ru'w* (Signature of Applicant) ?nlwu Srtla"Coqfr STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COII.IER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means ot%hVsicalpresence or ilonline registration *is7-L aavor T,ntloY za")fi,by I anpn 5 ol&* or h,4has produced who is f!L Signature H elre'*t>i#3r:"t Print Name of Notary Public personally known to me as identification. e ,r--e**HALIE DICKSON Notary Public, State of Florida Commission# HH 459905 My comm. expires Oct. 30,2027 Page 5175 of 5243 *LocaliQ Florida GANNETT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PO Box 631244 Cincinnati, OH 45263-1244 James Sainvilus James Sainvilus 1300 Roberts AVE W lmmokalee FL 34142-3610 STATE OF WISCONSIN, COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, who on oath says that he or she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Naples Daily News, a newspaper published in Collier County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Ad in the matter of Main Legal CLEGL, was published on the publicly accessible website of Collier and Lee Counties, Florida, or in a newspaper by print in the issues of, on: 11/24/2024 Affiant further says that the website or newspaper complies with all legal requirements for publication in chapter 50, Florida Statutes. Subscribed and sworn to before me, by the legal clerk, who is personally known to me, on 11/24/2024 ~ ~;;;;--- My commission expires Publication Cost: Tax Amount: Payment Cost: Order No: Customer No: PO#: THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE! $234.78 $0.00 $234.78 10789503 1497055 # of Copies: 1 Please do not use this form for paym ent rem ittance. NANCY HEYRMAN Notary Public State of Wisconsin Page 1 of 2 Page 5176 of 5243 N eig hb orho od Inform ati on M eeting for Sain vilus S ub division PU D Z (P L202 3 0016 6 22 ) The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by Canon Sandora, PE of Canon Sandora Civil Engineering, Inc. and William Glass, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP of G2 Architecture, Inc., representing the developer, James Sainvilus, regarding the proposed rezoning of a 4.52 acre property located at 1215 Forrester Ave. and 1300 Roberts Ave. West. The rezone from RSF-3 to RPUDZ has been proposed to accommodate for new, safe, hurricane resistant single-family units (zero lot line) and detached single-family units on the property (27 units total). The meeting will be held on December 11th, 2024 at 4:30pm at the CareerSource SWFL Conference Room located at 750 South 5th Street, lmmokalee, Florida. Please call (239)-692-6738 if you have any questions. ✓• lmmokak, UR l~l,·r ,\\'t ,, Project Location ... ',f \nhin~a " CIR Page 5177 of 5243 CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION PUDZ canon@cs-ce.com ∙ (239)-692-6738 ∙ 9201 Tangelo Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33967 9201 Tangelo Blvd. Fort Myers, FL 33967 canon@cs-ce.com 11/19/2024 Dear Property Owner, Please be advised that a formal application has been submitted to Collier County seeking approval of a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUDZ) for the following described property: 4.52 acre property with addresses 1215 Forrester Avenue and 1300 Roberts Avenue West, located 400 feet west of the intersection of Forrester Avenue and North 11th Street. The petitioner is asking the County to approve this application to allow development of 27 units, including 26 single-family attached units (zero lot line) and 1 single-family detached unit, on the 4.52 acre property. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on December 11th, 2024 at 4:30pm at the CareerSource SWFL Conference Room located at 750 South 5th Street, Immokalee, Florida. The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. At the meeting the petitioner will make every effort to illustrate how the property will be developed and to answer any questions. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me. Sincerely, 11/19/24 ∙ Canon Sandora, P.E. Date Page 5178 of 5243 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA INC 7500 DAVIS BLVD NAPLES, FL 34104---0 CERVANTES, JACINTO ROSALINDA F CERVANTES 1204 ROBERTS AVE W IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3608 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 DELACRUZ, CARLOS FIDEL ANA LAURA DELACRUZ 601 PALM RIDGE DR IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---4219 DELACRUZ, CARLOS FIDEL ANA LAURA DELACRUZ 601 PALM RIDGE DR IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---4219 DIVINE TOMATOES INC PO BOX 3413 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 DIVINE TOMATOES INC PO BOX 3413 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 ESCAMILLA, FRANCISCO HUAPILLA 1207 TYLER AVE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 FIRST BANK 300 EAST SUGARLAND HWY CLEWISTON, FL 33440---0 FIRST BANK PO BOX 1237 CLEWISTON, FL 33440---0 GOMEZ, ARMANDO & MARIA 307 N 11TH ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3426 GOMEZ, ARMANDO & MARIA 307 N 11TH ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3426 GOODWILL INDUST OF SW FL INC 5100 TICE ST FORT MYERS, FL 33905---0 GUERRERO, MARTIN ALVARADO CLEOTILDE ALVARADO 1212 FORRESTER AVE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 HOWEL ROBERTS LLC PO BOX 5158 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 HOWELL ROBERTS LLC PO BOX 5158 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 HOWELL ROBERTS LLC PO BOX 5158 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 HOWELL ROBERTS LLC PO BOX 5158 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---5158 HUAPILLA, GENARO PO BOX 2723 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 HUAPILLA, GENARO & ROSA M PO BOX 2723 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---2723 HUAPILLA, RODRIGO 420 N 11TH ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 JANE BROWN GRAVEYARD 1380 ROBERTS AVE W IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3610 MARTIN TOMAS, MARTIN P 3284 72ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 MARTINEZ, LORENZO 803 MANATEE ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 MARTINEZ, LORENZO 803 MANATEE ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 MARTINEZ, LORENZO 803 MANATEE ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3009 MENDOZA, JOSE DEBORAH AVELAR 1212 TYLER AVE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3424 MIRALLES JR, ALFREDO 3751 CROFTON CT FT MYERS, FL 33916---0 MONTELONGO, LEONOR 1201 TYLER AVE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 Page 5179 of 5243 MORENI, MAURICIO PEREZ EVELYN BAHENA 1207 FORRESTER AVE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 OCANAS, JORGE & SYLVIA 1225 FORRESTER AVE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3408 ORO, LUIS JAVIER HUAPILLA PABLO HUAPILLA ZAPOTE 1203 TYLER AVENUE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 PEDRO, MANUEL MIGUEL EVANGELINA PEREZ GONZALEZ 1212 ROBERTS AVE W IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3608 QUINTANA, GULMARO 705 HIGHLAND AVE LEHIGH ACRES, FL 33972---0 QUINTANA, LUCIO PO BOX 395 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---395 REBOLLEDO, CARLOS A GARCIA 1218 FORRESTER AVE IMMOKALEE, FL 33934---0 ROBERTS, RICHARD & JACQUELYN 5288 RIVER BLOSSOM LN FORT DENAUD, FL 33935---603 ROJAS, MARIO A 1208 TYLER AVE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3424 SAINT VILUS, JEAN C ELIAMENE SAINT VILUS 1122 FORRESTER AVE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3407 SAINT VILUS, SAINVIL 1104 FORRESTER AVE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3407 SAINVILUS LLC 1122 FORRESTER AVE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 SAINVILUS, JAMES & FRANCESCA L JEAN CALIXTE & ELIAMENE SAINVILUS 1300 ROBERTS AVE W IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 SAINVILUS, JAMES & FRANCESCA L JEAN CALIXTE & ELIAMENE SAINVILUS 1300 ROBERTS AVE W IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3610 SANCHEZ, PAMELA J 1300 ROBERTS AVE W IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 SANDOVAL WHOLESALES INC 424 E NEW MARKET RD UNIT 5 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 SANDOVAL WHOLESALES INC 424 E NEW MARKET RD UNIT 5 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 SCHOOL DISTRICT-IMS IMMOKALEE MIDDLE % SUPERINTENDENT 5775 OSCEOLA TRL NAPLES, FL 34109---919 SIERRA, GILBERTO & ILIANA PO BOX 1782 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1782 TREVINO, RICARDO 1200 ROBERTS AVE W IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 VINCENT, IMMACULA PO BOX 2249 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---2249 Page 5180 of 5243 Page 5181 of 5243 123456789101413121115161718192021222324252627REF.DWWDWH LANAI9'-4" CLGKITCHENLOWER MASTER2 CAR GARAGELIVINGPORCHENTRY9'-4" CLG9'-4" CLG2 CAR GARAGELIVING9'-4" CLGENTRYPORCHLOWER MASTER9'-4" CLGLANAI9'-4" CLGKITCHENDECKFAMILY ROOMMASTER BEDROOMM. WICM. BATHBEDROOM #3DECKBEDROOM #4DECKDECKScaleProject numberDateDrawn byChecked byWILLIAM K . GLASS#AR 929260SEAL:THE DRAWING AND DESIGN WITHINTHIS HARDCOPY OR DIGITAL FILE ISTHE PROPERTY AND CREATION OFG2 ARCHITECTURE INC. AND SHALLNOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE ORIN PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSEDWRITTEN CONSENT OFG2 ARCHITECTURE INC. © 2024As IndicatedA1Site Plan -Floor Plans-12-11-2024MBRWGNo.DescriptionDate3525 BONITA BEACH RD. #110BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134OFFICE : 239-319-0105CELL : 239-877-2500w:GLASS˫GBAIL.COBôôô.©2دÂ.ÈÁProject: Sainvilus SubdivisionSITE PLANFIRST FLOOR PLANSECOND FLOOR PLANScale : 1" = 40'Scale : 1/16" = 1' - 0"Scale : 1/16" = 1' - 0"Page 5182 of 5243 First Floor0' -0"Second Floor10' -4"Roof19' -8"First Floor0' -0"Second Floor10' -4"Roof19' -8"512First Floor0' -0"Second Floor10' -4"Roof19' -8"ScaleProject numberDateDrawn byChecked byWILLIAM K . GLASS #AR 92960SEAL:THE DRAWING AND DESIGN WITHIN THIS HARDCOPY OR DIGITAL FILE IS THE PROPERTY AND CREATION OF G2 ARCHITECTURE INC. AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF G2 ARCHITECTURE INC. © 20233525 Bonita Beach Rd SW # 110Bonita Springs, FL 34134Phone: 239-877-2500wkglass@gmail.comwww.g2archinc.com1/8" = 1'-0"7/31/2024 12:21:15 PMA3Elevations-Project: New Duplex7-31-22AuthorCheckerNo. Description Date1/8" = 1'-0"1Front Elevation1/8" = 1'-0"2Left Side Elevation1/8" = 1'-0"3NorthPage 5183 of 5243 5:125:125:125:125:125:125:127:127:127:127:125:125:125:125:125:1216"16"16"ScaleProject numberDateDrawn byChecked byWILLIAM K . GLASS #AR 92960SEAL:THE DRAWING AND DESIGN WITHIN THIS HARDCOPY OR DIGITAL FILE IS THE PROPERTY AND CREATION OF G2 ARCHITECTURE INC. AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF G2 ARCHITECTURE INC. © 20233525 Bonita Beach Rd SW # 110Bonita Springs, FL 34134Phone: 239-877-2500wkglass@gmail.comwww.g2archinc.com1/8" = 1'-0"7/31/2024 12:21:15 PMA4Unnamed-Project: New Duplex7-31-22AuthorCheckerNo. Description Date13D View 11/8" = 1'-0"2Roof Plan Copy 1Page 5184 of 5243 CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY canon@cs-ce.com ∙ (239)-692-6738 ∙ 9201 Tangelo Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33967 APPENDIX I METHODOLOGY MEETING NOTES Page 5185 of 5243 SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION PUDZ 1215 FORRESTER AVE. & 1300 ROBERTS AVE. W. APPLICATION # PL20230016622 APPLICANTS: SAINVILUS LLC 1122 FORRESTER AVE., IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 JAMES & FRANCESCA SAINVILUS, JEAN CALIXTE & ELIAMENE SAINVILUS 1300 ROBERTS AVE. W., IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 (239)-839-0322 PREPARER: CANON SANDORA, PE CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. 9201 TANGELO BLVD., FORT MYERS, FL 33967 (239)-692-6738 January 10th, 2025 Page 5186 of 5243 CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY canon@cs-ce.com ∙ (239)-692-6738 ∙ 9201 Tangelo Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33967 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. DEVELOPMENT INTRODUCTION II. EXISTING CONDITIONS III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IV. TRIP GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION V. PROJECTED SIGNIFICANT IMPACT & CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS VI. CONCLUSION Page 5187 of 5243 CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY canon@cs-ce.com ∙ (239)-692-6738 ∙ 9201 Tangelo Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33967 I. INTRODUCTION The proposed development is for 27 single-family housing units on a 4.52 acre property located at 1215 Forrester Ave. and 1300 Roberts Ave. West, in Immokalee, Florida. To allow for the development to take place, the applicant is seeking a rezone from RSF-3 to PUDZ. The development has proposed access on Forrester Ave. and on Roberts Ave. West. The attached TIS Appendix II illustrates the proposed development along with a location map for the property. Canon Sandora Civil Engineering, Inc. completed a TIS Methodology Meeting with Collier County Growth Management staff to complete this TIS report. The initial meeting checklist notes are included in Appendix I of this report. Trip generation, distributions and projected concurrency computations have been completed to analyze the development’s impact on surrounding roadways. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject property currently has one single-family house (which will remain). The rest of the property is currently vacant. Bordering the subject property is Forrester Ave. to the north, Roberts Ave. W. to the south, single-family housing units to the east, and vacant land to the west. III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development is for 27 single-family housing units. The access for 24 of the units to the subject property is from a connection point on Forrester Ave., and 3 of the units will access from Roberts Ave. West, as shown on the Master Concept Plan. The posted speed limits for Forrester Ave, and Roberts Ave West are 25 mph and 30 mph. respectively. Since both streets have residential homes and are within the same neighborhood, both streets are well suited for access to the proposed single- family homes. Because of the unique shape of the development and frontage on both Forrester Ave. and Roberts Ave. West, having access points on both is thought to be the most practical option significantly reduces the amount of impervious area for right-of-way that would be needed to interconnect all units by one access, and therefore increases the amount of proposed open space. IV. TRIP GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION Trip generations for the proposed development was completed from the Institute of Transportation Engineer’s (ITE) report, titled Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. The single-family detached housing Land Use Code 210 was utilized (see Appendix III) because it is more conservative (more trips) than single-family attached housing Land Use Code 215. The fitted curve method was utilized to project the Trip Generation data. Trip Distribution assignments are illustrated in Appendix II. TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION LAND USE WEEKDAY AM PK HR WEEKDAY PM PK HR DAILY (2- WAY) ENTER (26%) EXIT (74%) TOT ENTER (63%) EXIT (37%) TOT 27 SINGLE FAM-DETACH 210 6 17 23 18 11 29 303 Page 5188 of 5243 CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY canon@cs-ce.com ∙ (239)-692-6738 ∙ 9201 Tangelo Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33967 V. PROJECTED SIGNIFICANT IMPACT & CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS Table 2 was completed to determine if State Road 29, between 9th Street and County Road 29A North as well as Lake Trafford Road would be significantly impacted due to the project. Appendix II was used to determine the projects peak hour trips in the peak direction, and Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), shown in Appendix IV, was used to determine the peak hour allowable volume in the peak direction. Tabel 2 shows that projects peak hour trips in the peak direction would have a 1.2% impact on this segment of State Road 29 and 0.4% on Lake Trafford Road, so this major collector is not projected to be significantly impacted. The local roads, Forrester Avenue and North 11 th Street will be impacted at greater than 2%, however due to the minimal amount of traffic on the streets currently, these local roads can handle the traffic due to the proposed development. TABLE 2 PROJECTED SIGNIFICANT IMPACT SEGMENT ID# LOS STD PK HR PK DIR PROJ TRAFFIC PK HR PR DIR % LOS STD PK HR PK DIR SIGNIFICANT IMPACT SR 29 BTWN 9TH & CR29A NORTH 85.0 900 10 1.1% NO LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD 47.0 800 3 0.4% NO Table 3 was completed to determine the 2023 AUIR volume with banked trips as well as the Future Background Traffic for the build-out year (2029). AUIR traffic volumes were obtained from the 2023 Collier County AUIR Reports, Shown in Appendix IV. The 2029 Future build-out year was calculated using the 2023 AUIR volume, and adding the Annual Growth Rate (2%) for 6 years of growth. TABLE 3 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC SGMNT ID# 2023 AUIR VOL 2023 TRIPS BANKED 2023 AUIR VOL W/ BANKED TRIPS YRS OF GRWTH ANNUAL GRWTH RATE 2029 FUTURE BCKGRND SR 29 BTWN 9TH & CR29A NORTH 85.0 690 146 836 6 2.0% 777 LAKE TRAFF- ORD ROAD 47.0 480 133 613 6 2.0% 541 Table 4 was completed to determine if State Road 29, between 9th and County Road 29A North would have sufficient available capacity during the peak hour in the peak direction once the project trips were Page 5189 of 5243 CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY canon@cs-ce.com ∙ (239)-692-6738 ∙ 9201 Tangelo Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33967 added in. Since the 2023 AUIR volume with banked trips were higher than the 2029 Future Background Trips, the peak hour peak direction trips were added to the 2023 AUIR volume with banked trips. It was determined that the segment would not have sufficient capacity available for the proposed development, please see the conclusion for further explanation. Lake Trafford Road will have available capacity. TABLE 4 PROJECTED CONCURRENCY SEGMENT ID# PK DIR LOS STD PROJECT PK HR PK DIR AUIR 2023 VOL 2023 AUIR VOL W/ BANKED TRIPS 2029 FUTURE BCKGND BCKGRND + PROJ TRAFFIC VOL SUFF CAP AVAIL? SR 29 BTWN 9TH & CR29A NORTH 85.0 900 10 690 836 777 846 YES LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD 47.0 800 3 480 613 541 616 YES VI. CONCLUSION The proposed 27 single-family unit development was analyzed based on the 2023 AUIR and future 2029 build-out traffic estimates. It was determined per Collier County requirements that the proposed development will not significantly impact to the surrounding roadway (1.2% impact), State Road 29, between County Road 29A North, and therefore expected deficiency in availability is due to trip bank not cause by this development. Additionally, FDOT has Link 86.0 expansion to 4-lane as cost feasible, plus the SR-29 round-about and bypass are both Florida Forward projects. Furthermore, the proposed development is expected to be completed over the course of 5 years, so only 2 trips are expected to be banked on State Road 29, between County Road 29A North and 9th per year due to the project. Also, Lake Trafford Road will not be significantly impacted and has ample available capacity, and the local roads connecting the proposed development to the collector will be significantly impacted but have sufficient available capacity. Turn lane improvements will be evaluated at the Site Development Plan application stage. Page 5190 of 5243 CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY canon@cs-ce.com ∙ (239)-692-6738 ∙ 9201 Tangelo Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33967 APPENDIX I METHODOLOGY MEETING NOTES Page 5191 of 5243 CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY canon@cs-ce.com ∙ (239)-692-6738 ∙ 9201 Tangelo Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33967 APPENDIX II TRIP DISTRIBUTION EXHIBIT WITH AERIAL MAP Page 5192 of 5243 CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY canon@cs-ce.com ∙ (239)-692-6738 ∙ 9201 Tangelo Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33967 APPENDIX III ITE TRIP GENERATION MANUAL, 11 TH EDITION TRIP GENERATIONS EQUATIONS Page 5193 of 5243 CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY canon@cs-ce.com ∙ (239)-692-6738 ∙ 9201 Tangelo Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33967 APPENDIX IV 2013 & 2023 COLLIER COUNTY AUIR REPORTS Page 5194 of 5243 Page 5195 of 5243 Page 5196 of 5243 Special Features:(from preliminary study or prior experience) Accident locations:N/A Sight distance :30 0'to stop si0n Queuing:N/A Plan Access location & configuration:ve Traffic control:s Signal system location On-site parking needs: &progression needs : N/A N/A Data Sources:NIA Base maps:NIA Prior studY rePorts:N/A Access policY and jurisdiction:NiA Review process : N/A Requirements:N/A Miscellaneous: N/A SIGNATURES Study Reviewers 29 Page 5197 of 5243 CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY canon@cs-ce.com ∙ (239)-692-6738 ∙ 9201 Tangelo Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33967 APPENDIX II TRIP DISTRIBUTION EXHIBIT WITH AERIAL MAP Page 5198 of 5243 FORRESTER AVE.NORTH 11 ST.ROBERTS AVE. W.SR 29 - W MAIN ST.IMMOKALEE DR. PEAK AM ENTERING: 1 TRIPSPEAK AM EXISTING: 3 TRIPSPEAK PM ENTERING: 3 TRIPSPEAK PM EXISTING: 2 TRIPS AM LEFT IN: 5 AM RIGHT OUT: 15 PM LEFT IN: 16 PM RIGHT OUT: 9 AM RIGHT IN: 4 AM LEFT OUT: 11 PM RIGHT IN: 12 PM LEFT OUT: 7 AM LEFT IN: 1 AM RIGHT OUT: 4 PM LEFT IN: 4 PM RIGHT OUT: 2 AM RIGHT IN: 1 AM LEFT OUT: 5 PM RIGHT IN: 5 PM LEFT OUT: 3 AM LEFT IN: 3 AM RIGHT OUT: 8 PM LEFT IN: 9 PM RIGHT OUT: 5 75% DISTRIBUTION25% DISTRIBUTION75% DISTRIBUTION 25% DISTRIBUTION AM LEFT IN: 1 AM RIGHT OUT: 3 PM LEFT IN: 3 PM RIGHT OUT: 2 AM RIGHT IN: 3 AM LEFT OUT: 8 PM RIGHT IN: 9 PM LEFT OUT: 5 LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD SR 2967% DISTRIBUTION33% DISTRIBUTION AM RIGHT IN: 1 AM LEFT OUT: 3 PM RIGHT IN: 3 PM LEFT OUT: 2 AM STRAIGHT IN: 3 AM STRAIGHT OUT: 7 PM STRAIGHT IN: 7 PM STRAIGHT OUT: 4 AM LEFT IN: 1 AM RIGHT OUT: 1 PM LEFT IN: 1 PM RIGHT OUT: 1 AM RIGHT IN: 0 AM LEFT OUT: 1 PM RIGHT IN: 1 PM LEFT OUT: 1 50% DISTRIBUTION 50% DISTRIBUTION AM LEFT IN: 1 AM RIGHT OUT: 1 PM LEFT IN: 1 PM RIGHT OUT: 1 60% DISTRIBUTION25% DISTRIBUTION15% DISTRIBUTION AM STRAIGHT IN: 1 AM STRAIGHT OUT: 1 PM STRAIGHT IN: 1 PM STRAIGHT OUT: 1 AM RIGHT IN: 0 AM LEFT OUT: 0 PM RIGHT IN: 0 PM LEFT OUT: 0 AM RIGHT IN: 0 AM LEFT OUT: 1 PM RIGHT IN: 1 PM LEFT OUT: 1 CANON SANDORACIVIL ENGINEERING, INC.NO. DESCRIPTION DATEPROJECT:SAINVILUSSUBDIVISIONPROJECT NO. 23-022 DATE 8/21/24 BY CGS SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALE 1"=200'ENGINEER: CANON SANDORA, PESTATE OF FLORIDA LICENSE # 953039201 TANGELO BLVD. FT. MYERS, FL 33967CANON@CS-CE.COM WWW.CS-CE.COM(239)-692-6738PROPERTY OWNER:SAINVILUSTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDYAPPENDIX IITRIP DISTRIBUTIONPage 5199 of 5243 CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY canon@cs-ce.com ∙ (239)-692-6738 ∙ 9201 Tangelo Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33967 APPENDIX III ITE TRIP GENERATION MANUAL, 11 TH EDITION TRIP GENERATIONS EQUATIONS Page 5200 of 5243 Page 5201 of 5243 Page 5202 of 5243 Page 5203 of 5243 CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY canon@cs-ce.com ∙ (239)-692-6738 ∙ 9201 Tangelo Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33967 APPENDIX IV 2013 & 2023 COLLIER COUNTY AUIR REPORTS Page 5204 of 5243 Attachment "F" Collier County 2012 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) Based on Adopted LOS, Trip Bank and Traffic Counts COLLIER COUNTY 2011 ANNUAL UPDATE INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) - Collier County Transportation Database (Based on LOSPLAN and current traffic volumes) 1.0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 32 2009 CH2MHill 2011 AUIR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2012 2012 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak 2013 2013 Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Actual Percent 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Diff L Year DistanceExist Cnt. Min Peak Service Service Service Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Variation Variation Trip Trip Trip Trip Trip Trip Trip Trip Total Remain. O Expected ID#CIE#Proj#Road#Link From To (Miles)Road Sta.Std Dir Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume To Volume To Volume Bank Bank Bank Bank Bank Bank Bank Bank Volume Capacity V/C S Deficient Notes HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE 1.0 99910 CR31 Airport Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 4D 554 D S 2,200 2,200 2,460 1,420 1,449 1,423 1,309 1,252 1,247 1,310 63 5.05%227 203 157 157 157 156 158 2 1,468 732 66.7%C Northwest TCMA 2.1 55 62031 CR31 Airport Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Orange Blossom Dr.6D 599 E N 3,000 3,000 3,970 1,730 1,860 1,814 1,831 1,746 1,857 1,910 53 2.87%408 376 345 345 345 345 345 0 2,255 745 75.2%D Northwest TCMA 2.2 55 62031 CR31 Airport Road Orange Blossom Dr.Pine Ridge Rd.6D 503 E N 3,000 3,000 3,970 1,730 2,036 1,900 1,734 1,809 1,709 1,790 81 4.72%408 302 281 281 281 188 188 0 1,978 1022 65.9%C Northwest TCMA 3.0 39 60121 CR31 Airport Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway 6D 502 E N 3,000 3,000 3,830 2,100 1,757 1,687 1,738 1,588 1,619 1,750 131 8.11%316 352 253 253 253 247 107 (140)1,857 1143 61.9%C 4.0 99906 CR31 Airport Road Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 6D 533 E N 2,800 2,800 3,230 1,690 2,045 2,159 1,923 2,017 1,976 2,150 174 8.83%213 233 165 165 167 148 65 (83)2,215 585 79.1%D 5.0 3 66031 CR31 Airport Road Radio Road Davis Boulevard 6D 553 E N 2,800 2,800 4,100 2,270 2,258 2,164 1,776 2,138 1,828 1,890 62 3.37%193 181 208 208 208 151 151 0 2,041 759 72.9%C 6.0 3 66031 CR31 Airport Road Davis Boulevard US 41 6D 552 E S 2,700 2,700 2,580 1,660 1,818 1,562 1,412 1,473 1,474 1,520 46 3.14%193 181 182 182 182 182 182 0 1,702 998 63.0%C TCEA 7.0 99911 Bayshore Drive Tamiami Trail Thomasson Drive 4D 521 D S 1,800 1,700 1,950 710 661 569 614 551 510 530 20 4.00%41 86 91 91 91 55 27 (28)557 1243 30.9%B TCEA 8.0 31 60021 CR 865 Bonita Beach Road West of Vanderbilt Dr.Hickory Boulevard 4D 653 D E 1,900 1,900 1,620 1,350 1,355 937 1,392 1,014 984 990 6 0.62%85 0 0 0 0 0 0 990 910 52.1%B 9.0 Carson Road Lake Trafford Road Immokalee Drive 2U 610 D N 600 600 760 270 263 251 251 262 289 280 (9)-2.95%0 0 0 0 0 0 280 320 46.7%B 10.0 33 60101 County Barn Road Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Road 2U 519 D S 900 900 860 650 666 584 754 407 285 280 (5)-1.60%160 153 108 108 108 107 107 0 387 513 43.0%B 11.0 99912 CR29 CR 29 Tamiami Trail Everglades City 2U 582A D S 1,000 1,000 875 140 145 141 141 151 154 120 (34)-21.89%4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 124 876 12.4%B 12.0 SR84 Davis Boulevard Tamiami Trail Airport Road 6D 558 E E 2,700 2,600 3,420 1,770 1,691 1,614 1,530 1,331 1,409 1,400 (9)-0.66%67 58 51 51 51 51 44 (7)1,444 1256 53.5%C TCEA 13.0 48 60161 SR84 Davis Boulevard Airport Road Lakewood Boulevard 4D 559 D E 2,000 2,000 2,080 1,760 1,641 1,642 1,470 1,431 1,413 1,440 27 1.88%62 57 70 70 70 46 46 0 1,486 514 74.3%C 14.0 49 60161 SR84 Davis Boulevard Lakewood Boulevard County Barn Road 4D 658 D E 2,000 2,000 2,430 1,760 1,641 1,642 1,470 1,471 1,490 1,420 (70)-4.70%142 127 162 162 162 162 162 0 1,582 418 79.1%D East Central TCMA 15.0 83 60161 SR84 Davis Boulevard County Barn Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 538 D E 2,200 2,200 2,575 1,730 1,616 1,468 1,482 1,386 1,374 1,310 (64)-4.67%277 259 282 343 343 98 91 (7)1,401 799 63.7%C East Central TCMA 16.1 83 SR84 Davis Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Rd.4D 560 D E 2,900 2,600 1,040 863 742 665 648 627 627 (0)-0.04%209 207 427 427 427 418 418 0 1,045 1855 36.0%B East Central TCMA 16.2 83 SR84 Davis Boulevard Radio Rd.Collier Boulevard 6U 601 D W 2,900 2,600 1,530 1,410 1,184 1,113 998 1,073 1,011 1,011 (0)-0.04%209 484 773 773 773 773 773 0 1,784 1116 61.5%C East Central TCMA 17.0 62 63041 CR876 Golden Gate Boulevard Collier Boulevard Wilson Boulevard 4D 531 D E 2,300 2,300 2,350 2,090 1,693 1,551 1,517 1,507 1,564 1,550 (14)-0.88%263 300 269 269 270 130 128 (2)1,678 622 73.0%C 18.0 99913 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway US 41 Goodlette-Frank Road 6D 530 E E 2,700 2,600 3,180 1,010 1,151 1,018 987 991 975 1,070 95 9.78%75 63 51 51 51 51 51 0 1,121 1579 41.5%B 19.0 5 60027C CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road 6D 507 E E 3,300 3,200 4,350 1,770 2,447 2,295 3,157 2,442 2,422 2,590 168 6.94%142 112 105 105 105 105 105 0 2,695 605 81.7%D 20.1 74 60006 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Airport Road Livingston Rd.6D 508 E E 3,300 3,300 4,370 1,330 2,093 2,298 2,409 2,376 2,350 2,410 60 2.55%178 150 141 141 141 141 141 0 2,551 749 77.3%D Northwest TCMA 20.2 74 60006 CR886 Golden Gate Pwky Livingston Rd.I-75 6D 691 E E 3,300 3,200 4,370 1,330 2,517 2,468 2,657 2,405 2,683 2,600 (83)-3.09%178 150 148 148 151 140 140 0 2,740 560 83.0%D East Central TCMA 21.0 74 60027 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway I-75 Santa Barbara Boulevard 6D 509 E E 3,300 3,200 3,730 1,600 2,084 1,929 1,937 1,711 2,021 2,090 69 3.40%176 139 134 137 137 137 137 0 2,227 1073 67.5%C East Central TCMA 22.0 99916 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 4D 605 D E 1,800 1,800 1,980 1,700 1,603 1,600 1,388 1,301 1,390 1,510 120 8.63%173 164 154 154 154 121 121 0 1,631 169 90.6%D East Central TCMA 23.0 19 68041 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 2U 594 D N 1,000 1,000 1,190 730 708 675 722 711 686 700 14 1.98% 238 238 163 163 163 163 144 (19)844 156 84.4% D Northwest TCMA 24.0 65 60134 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 6/4D 596 E N 2,400 2,300 2,790 1,540 1,520 1,415 1,481 1,473 1,512 1,600 88 5.84% 181 180 82 82 82 82 82 0 1,682 718 70.1% C Northwest TCMA 24.1 65 60134 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Orange Blossom Dr. 4D 595 E N 2,400 2,000 2,790 1,540 1,520 1,415 1,481 1,473 1,512 1,370 (142)-9.38% 181 180 82 82 82 82 82 0 1,452 948 60.5% C Northwest TCMA 24.2 65 60134 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Orange Blossom Dr. Pine Ridge Road 6D 581 E N 2,400 3,000 2,790 1,540 1,520 1,415 1,481 1,473 1,512 1,570 58 3.85% 181 180 82 82 82 82 82 0 1,652 748 68.8% C Northwest TCMA 25.0 88 60005 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway 6D 505 E N 3,000 3,000 3,420 1,800 1,690 1,685 1,728 2,082 1,736 1,760 24 1.38%158 90 77 77 77 63 62 (1)1,822 1178 60.7%C 26.0 99917 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Golden Gate Parkway Tamiami Trail 6D 504 E N 2,700 2,600 3,500 1,860 2,087 2,015 1,894 1,872 1,790 1,900 110 6.14%115 96 128 128 128 104 104 0 2,004 696 74.2%C 27.0 87 68055 Green Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 2U 642 D E 900 900 1,040 820 659 570 707 581 587 610 23 3.95% 18 17 17 17 17 17 17 0 627 273 69.7% C East Central TCMA 28.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a NA NA n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 n/a 29.0 66011 Gulfshore Drive 111th Avenue Vanderbilt Beach Road 2U 583a D N 800 800 530 190 205 244 244 210 236 150 (86)-36.39%16 12 12 12 12 12 12 0 162 638 20.3%B 30.1 37 65061 CR951 Collier Boulevard Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Rd.6D 655 E N 3,000 2,900 3,270 1,120 1,120 1,100 1,100 1,321 1,285 1,490 205 15.93%612 595 648 648 648 648 771 123 2,261 739 75.4%D 30.2 37 65061 CR951 Collier Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Rd.Golden Gate Boulevard 6D 584 E S 3,000 2,880 3,270 1,926 1,822 1,817 1,824 1,581 1,515 1,070 (445)-29.37%612 592 564 564 564 564 564 0 1,634 1366 54.5%C 31.0 85 68056 CR951 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Boulevard Green Blvd 6/4D 536 D N 2,880 2,880 2,180 2,170 1,884 1,817 1,824 1,710 1,717 1,800 83 4.82%333 311 310 310 310 0 1,800 1080 62.5%C 2013 Construction 31.1 85 68056 CR951 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Boulevard Pine Ridge Road 6D 536 D N 3,000 2,880 2,450 1,824 1,710 1,717 1,800 83 4.82%310 310 310 310 0 2,110 890 70.3%C FY 14 Construction 31.2 85 68056 CR951 Collier Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Green 6D 536 D N 3,000 2,880 2,450 1,824 1,710 1,717 1,800 83 4.82%310 310 310 310 0 2,110 890 70.3%C East Central TCMA 32.1 76 65062 CR951 Collier Boulevard Green Boulevard Golden Gate Pwky 4D 525 D N 2,300 2,300 2,360 1,750 1,444 1,550 1,458 1,468 1,368 1,250 (118)-8.65%586 553 712 712 714 714 715 1 1,965 335 85.4%D East Central TCMA 32.2 76 68056B CR951 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Pwky I-75 4D/8D 607 D/E N 3,000 2,960 2,450 1,540 1,384 1,313 1,212 1,248 1,278 1,130 (148)-11.57%586 617 951 951 951 873 857 (16)1,987 1013 66.2%C East Central TCMA 32.2 76 68056B CR951 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Pwky Golden Gate Main Canal 4D 607 D N 2,300 2,960 2,450 1,540 1,384 1,313 1,212 1,248 1,278 1,130 (148)-11.57%586 617 951 951 951 873 857 (16)1,987 313 86.4%D East Central TCMA 32.3 76 68056B CR951 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Main Canal I-75 8D 607 E N 3,600 2,960 2,450 1,540 1,384 1,313 1,212 1,248 1,278 1,130 (148)-11.57%586 617 951 951 951 873 857 (16)1,987 1613 55.2%C East Central TCMA 33.0 61 60092 SR951 Collier Boulevard I-75 Davis Boulevard 8D 573 E N 3,600 3,600 3,000 2,750 2,483 2,252 2,120 2,193 2,016 2,016 0 0.00%402 767 929 929 929 929 929 0 2,945 655 81.8%D East Central TCMA/State 34.0 86 60001 CR951 Collier Boulevard Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Road 6D 602 E N 3,000 3,000 3,270 2,000 1,894 1,894 1,894 1,374 1,420 1,490 70 4.93%352 334 749 751 751 749 787 38 2,277 723 75.9%D 35.0 86 60001 CR951 Collier Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock RoadTamiami Trail 6D 603 E N 3,200 3,200 3,330 1,780 1,658 1,658 1,569 1,413 1,321 1,420 99 7.52%307 511 484 484 484 478 506 28 1,926 1274 60.2%C 36.1 12 64041 SR951 Collier Boulevard Tamiami Trail Wal-Mart Driveway 6D 557 E N 2,500 2,500 2,370 1,810 1,744 1,489 1,489 1,696 1,652 1,820 168 10.17%499 856 390 390 390 394 723 329 2,543 (43)101.7%F Existing State 36.2 SR951 Collier Boulevard Wal-Mart Driveway Manatee Rd.4D 700 D N 2,000 2,000 1,970 1,614 1,547 1,560 1,560 1,793 1,277 1,500 223 17.47%222 710 390 390 390 390 390 0 1,890 110 94.5%D 2017 State 37.0 12 64041 SR951 Collier Boulevard Manatee Road Mainsail Dr 4D 627 D N 2,200 2,300 2,590 1,400 1,384 1,392 1,392 1,173 1,187 1,340 153 12.87%257 540 386 395 395 384 384 0 1,724 476 78.4%D State 38.0 51 64041 SR951 Collier Boulevard Mainsail Dr Marco Island Bridge 4D 627 D N 2,200 2,000 2,480 1,400 1,384 1,276 1,276 1,173 1,187 1,340 153 12.87%5 5 5 5 7 6 6 0 1,346 854 61.2%C State 39.0 64 99901 CR846 111th Avenue N.Gulfshore Drive Vanderbilt Drive 2U 585 D E 700 700 760 220 251 254 274 302 261 240 (21)-8.07%22 17 30 30 30 8 8 0 248 452 35.4%B Northwest TCMA 40.0 1 60031 CR846 111th Avenue N.Vanderbilt Drive Tamiami Trail 2U 613 D E 900 900 1,040 350 380 348 348 360 376 380 4 1.10%105 107 109 109 109 109 109 0 489 411 54.3%C Northwest TCMA 41.1 6 66042 CR846 Immokalee Road Tamiami Trail Goodlette-Frank Rd.6D 566 E W 3,100 3,000 3,030 1,538 1,632 1,632 1,936 1,612 1,850 238 14.79%384 387 265 265 265 228 226 (2)2,076 1024 67.0%C Northwest TCMA 41.2 6 66042 CR846 Immokalee Road Goodlette-Frank Rd.Airport Road 6D 625 E E 3,100 3,000 3,030 2,060 1,865 2,104 2,104 2,166 2,153 2,390 237 11.01%384 475 340 340 340 338 338 0 2,728 372 88.0%D 2017 Northwest TCMA 42.1 6 66042 CR846 Immokalee Road Airport Road Livingston Rd.6D 567 E W 3,100 2,900 3,290 2,750 2,773 2,411 2,411 2,349 2,557 2,740 183 7.17%417 300 257 257 257 240 264 24 3,004 96 96.9%E 2016 Northwest TCMA 42.2 6 66042 CR846 Immokalee Road Livingston Rd.I-75 6D/8D 568 E E 3,500 3,500 3,800 2,750 2,773 2,773 2,773 2,461 1,940 2,240 300 15.48%417 295 252 252 252 252 294 42 2,534 966 72.4%C Northwest TCMA 43.1 8 66045 CR846 Immokalee Road I-75 Logan Boulevard 6D/8D 656 E E 3,500 3,500 3,800 1,800 1,800 1,788 1,788 1,858 1,647 1,750 103 6.28%776 741 669 687 727 711 763 52 2,513 987 71.8%C 43.2 CR846 Immokalee Road Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 656 E E 3,200 3,100 3,629 1,399 1,650 1,590 1,858 1,647 1,750 103 6.28%292 272 321 321 330 330 516 186 2,266 934 70.8%C 44.0 71 60018 CR846 Immokalee Road Collier Boulevard Wilson Boulevard 6D 674 E E 3,300 3,300 3,790 1,580 1,401 1,613 1,613 1,406 1,451 1,620 169 11.63%460 418 481 481 481 389 416 27 2,036 1264 61.7%C 45.0 71 60018 CR846 Immokalee Road Wilson Boulevard Oil Well Road 6D 675 E E 3,300 2,800 3,670 1,570 1,597 1,549 1,549 1,322 1,443 1,640 197 13.64%339 312 398 398 398 398 398 0 2,038 1262 61.8%C 46.0 73 60165 CR846 Immokalee Road Oil Well Road SR 29 2U 672 D E 900 900 860 330 262 277 318 249 245 250 5 2.17%85 80 99 99 99 93 79 (14)329 571 36.6%B 47.0 66 99903 Lake Trafford Road Carson Rd SR 29 2U 609 D E 800 800 875 370 367 362 362 396 396 410 14 3.54%67 73 65 65 65 0 0 0 410 390 51.3%B 48.0 60166 Logan Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 2U 587 D N 1,000 1,000 990 590 571 603 606 512 523 570 47 8.96%95 81 81 81 81 81 81 0 651 349 65.1%C 49.0 22 68051 Logan Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Green Boulevard 4D 588 D S 1,900 1,900 2,070 1,410 1,141 1,066 1,100 1,163 1,198 1,280 82 6.85%191 158 158 158 158 158 158 0 1,438 462 75.7%D East Central TCMA 50.0 79 60166 Logan Boulevard Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 2U 644 D N 1,000 1,000 1,100 355 379 603 422 420 430 10 2.37%0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 430 570 43.0%B 51.0 21 65041 CR881 Livingston Road Imperial Street Immokalee Road 6/4D 673 D N 3,000 3,000 3,260 1,080 1,039 1,098 1,103 1,074 1,095 1,240 145 13.24%144 155 118 118 118 74 115 41 1,355 1645 45.2%B Northwest TCMA 52.0 57 62071 CR881 Livingston Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 6D 576 E N 3,100 3,100 3,840 1,500 1,551 1,443 1,882 1,667 1,511 1,590 79 5.20%91 67 67 67 67 13 36 23 1,626 1474 52.5%B Northwest TCMA 53.0 58 62071 CR881 Livingston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 6D 575 E S 3,100 3,000 3,800 1,800 1,300 1,246 1,402 1,090 1,335 1,430 95 7.12%314 303 260 260 260 248 171 (77)1,601 1499 51.6%B Northwest TCMA 54.0 52 60071 CR881 Livingston Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway 6D 690 E N 3,100 3,100 3,800 1,650 1,351 1,432 1,361 1,323 1,787 1,510 (277)-15.52%293 292 257 257 257 250 250 0 1,760 1340 56.8%C East Central TCMA 55.0 53 60061 CR881 Livingston Road Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 6D 687 E N 3,000 2,900 3,760 1,780 1,742 1,323 1,067 1,067 1,156 1,130 (26)-2.22%142 132 114 114 114 115 115 0 1,245 1755 41.5%B East Central TCMA 56.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #VALUE!n/a 0 n/a 57.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #VALUE!n/a 0 n/a 58.0 67 99904 N. 1st Street New Market Road SR-29 (Main Street)2U 590 D N 900 900 1,000 590 457 431 397 364 453 420 (33)-7.26%16 15 13 13 13 13 13 0 433 467 48.1%B 59.0 New Market Road Broward Street SR 29 2U 612 D E 900 900 1,010 430 448 415 415 407 430 420 (10)-2.34%17 15 15 23 37 37 21 (16)441 459 49.0%B 60.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #VALUE!n/a 0 n/a 61.0 36 Camp Keais Oil Well Road Immokalee Road 2U 626A D S 1,000 1,000 860 230 272 250 250 143 125 130 5 4.23%203 162 162 162 162 162 162 0 292 708 29.2%B 62.0 68 99905 CR887 Old US 41 Lee County Line Tamiami Trail 2U 547 D N 1,000 1,000 1,010 940 893 863 833 725 758 820 62 8.19%56 120 65 65 65 57 58 1 878 122 87.8%D 63.0 99924 CR896 Seagate Drive Crayton Road Tamiami Trail 4D 511 D E 1,700 1,700 1,620 730 856 800 639 692 765 810 45 5.88%50 45 41 41 41 41 41 0 851 849 50.1%B Northwest TCMA 64.0 14 69042 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Tamiami Trail Goodlette-Frank Road 6D 512 E E 2,800 2,800 2,730 2,020 2,209 1,952 1,684 1,785 1,863 1,830 (33)-1.79%151 127 90 90 90 90 90 0 1,920 880 68.6%C Northwest TCMA 65.0 14 69042 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Goodlette-Frank Road Shirley Street 6D 514 E W 2,800 2,800 3,300 2,650 2,805 2,410 2,056 1,879 1,877 1,890 13 0.71%297 266 134 134 134 118 129 11 2,019 781 72.1%C Northwest TCMA 66.0 14 69042 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Shirley Street Airport Road 6D 515 E E 2,800 2,800 3,730 2,710 2,802 2,720 2,889 1,970 2,103 2,070 (33)-1.56%239 232 139 139 139 139 139 0 2,209 591 78.9%D Northwest TCMA 67.1 41 60111 CR846 Pine Ridge Road Airport Road Livingston Rd.6D 526 E E 3,000 2,800 3,730 3,030 2,887 2,705 2,489 2,318 2,415 2,480 65 2.70%523 555 355 355 355 351 351 0 2,831 169 94.4%D 2017 East Central TCMA 67.2 41 60111 CR846 Pine Ridge Road Livingston Rd.I-75 6D 628 E E 3,000 3,000 3,730 3,493 3,087 2,661 2,064 2,388 2,030 (358)-15.00%523 693 421 421 421 206 109 (97)2,139 861 71.3%C East Central TCMA 68.0 41 99907 CR896 Pine Ridge Road I-75 Logan Boulevard 6D 600 E E 2,800 2,700 3,790 2,650 2,531 2,237 2,071 1,908 1,963 1,880 (83)-4.23%167 225 205 205 205 204 204 0 2,084 716 74.4%C East Central TCMA 69.0 15 65032 CR856 Radio Road Airport Road Livingston Road 4D 544 D E 1,800 1,800 2,180 1,390 1,230 1,145 985 1,050 985 1,030 45 4.57%120 110 109 109 109 109 109 0 1,139 661 63.3%C 70.0 15 65033 CR856 Radio Road Livingston Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 527 D E 1,800 1,800 2,120 1,330 1,550 1,154 1,139 882 885 890 5 0.53%78 66 75 75 75 75 75 0 965 835 53.6%C East Central TCMA 71.0 16 65031 CR856 Radio Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard 4D 685 D W 1,800 1,800 2,100 1,000 750 502 490 600 495 510 15 3.12%113 97 283 283 283 283 283 0 793 1007 44.1%B East Central TCMA Page 5205 of 5243 2009 CH2MHill 2011 AUIR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2012 2012 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak 2013 2013 Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Actual Percent 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Diff L Year DistanceExist Cnt. Min Peak Service Service Service Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Variation Variation Trip Trip Trip Trip Trip Trip Trip Trip Total Remain. O Expected ID#CIE#Proj#Road#Link From To (Miles)Road Sta.Std Dir Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume To Volume To Volume Bank Bank Bank Bank Bank Bank Bank Bank Volume Capacity V/C S Deficient Notes HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE HIDE 1.0 99910 CR31 Airport Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 4D 554 D S 2,200 2,200 2,460 1,420 1,449 1,423 1,309 1,252 1,247 1,310 63 5.05%227 203 157 157 157 156 158 2 1,468 732 66.7%C Northwest TCMA 72.0 17 65021 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock RoadTamiami Trail Charlemagne Boulevard 4D 516 D W 1,800 1,800 1,940 1,080 1,080 1,007 1,613 1,536 1,486 1,630 144 9.69%146 146 132 132 119 119 160 41 1,790 10 99.4%E 2014 73.0 17 65021 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock RoadCharlemagne Boulevard County Barn Road 4D 517 D W 1,800 1,800 1,940 820 767 705 1,099 806 684 640 (44)-6.45%111 95 122 122 122 122 163 41 803 997 44.6%B 74.0 17 65021 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock RoadCounty Barn Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 534 D W 1,900 1,900 2,340 730 696 715 868 621 622 630 8 1.35%82 66 99 99 99 93 95 2 725 1175 38.2%B 75.0 77 60169 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock RoadSanta Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 518 E W 2,900 2,900 3,200 500 500 419 563 494 378 410 32 8.59%263 150 267 267 267 267 305 38 715 2185 24.7%B 76.0 56 62081B Santa Barbara Boulevard Green Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway 4D 529 D N 2,100 2,200 1,930 1,410 1,410 1,410 1,102 1,055 1,084 1,090 6 0.54%171 143 143 143 143 143 143 0 1,233 867 58.7%C East Central TCMA 77.0 56 62081A Santa Barbara Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 6D 528 E N 3,100 3,100 3,100 1,470 1,470 1,470 1,328 1,398 1,455 1,630 175 12.03%321 257 228 228 228 228 228 0 1,858 1242 59.9%C East Central TCMA 78.0 56 62081A Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Road Davis Boulevard 6D 537 E N 3,100 3,100 3,250 950 950 950 895 1,104 1,171 1,160 (11)-0.96%435 395 319 319 319 319 319 0 1,479 1621 47.7%B East Central TCMA 79.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake-Hammock Rd.6D 702 E S 3,100 3,100 3,250 439 695 750 55 7.88%0 111 111 0 861 2239 27.8%B 80.0 SR29 SR 29 Tamiami Trail CR 837 (Janes Scenic Dr)2U 615A D N 900 800 875 100 129 91 91 125 98 110 12 11.85%0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 790 12.2%B 81.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 837 (Janes Scenic Dr)I-75 2U 615A D N 900 800 875 100 129 91 91 125 98 110 12 11.85%0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 790 12.2%B 82.0 SR29 SR 29 I-75 Oil Well Road 2U 615A D N 900 800 875 100 129 91 91 125 98 110 12 11.85%35 28 28 28 28 28 36 8 146 754 16.2%B 83.0 SR29 SR 29 Oil Well Road CR 29A South 2U 665A D N 900 800 875 440 404 365 385 386 386 320 (66)-17.10%46 46 53 53 64 56 36 (20)356 544 39.6%B 84.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 29A South 9th Street 4D 664 D W 1,700 1,700 1,860 630 661 653 642 622 568 560 (8)-1.46%85 118 94 94 94 79 79 0 639 1061 37.6%B 85.0 SR29 SR 29 9th Street CR 29A North 2U 663 D S 900 900 875 620 550 598 539 532 498 500 2 0.46%50 92 112 112 125 68 95 27 595 305 66.1%C 86.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 29A North SR 82 2U 663 D S 900 700 875 550 598 539 532 498 500 2 0.46%86 75 64 64 64 64 64 0 564 336 62.7%C 87.0 SR29 SR 29 Hendry County Line SR 82 2U 591A D S 800 800 875 340 402 352 352 304 260 310 50 19.28%10 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 319 481 39.9%B 88.0 SR82 SR 82 Lee County Line SR 29 2U 661A D S 800 800 875 680 740 650 650 560 581 570 (11)-1.85%55 48 48 48 48 48 48 0 618 182 77.3%D 89.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East Four Corners Goodlette-Frank Road 6D 2,700 89 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 0 City of Naples 90.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East Goodlette-Frank Road Davis Boulevard 8D 3,200 206 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 City of Naples 91.0 43 US41 Tamiami Trail East Davis Boulevard Airport Road 6D 545 E E 2,900 2,900 2,750 1,800 1,867 1,731 1,821 1,558 1,492 1,520 28 1.91%214 203 203 203 203 203 203 0 1,723 1177 59.4%C TCEA 92.0 47 US41 Tamiami Trail East Airport Road Rattlesnake Hammock Road 6D 604 E E 2,900 2,900 3,200 2,200 2,521 2,471 2,491 2,068 2,108 2,170 62 2.94%379 397 329 355 367 343 320 (23)2,490 410 85.9%D TCEA 93.0 46 US41 Tamiami Trail East Rattlesnake Hammock RoadTriangle Boulevard 6D 572 E E 3,000 3,000 3,500 1,980 2,118 2,053 2,038 1,926 1,970 1,980 10 0.51%492 1022 665 665 659 564 577 13 2,557 443 85.2%D 94.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East Triangle Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 571 E E 3,000 2,800 3,200 1,200 1,613 1,460 1,705 1,299 1,374 1,310 (64)-4.64%405 888 527 527 527 533 533 0 1,843 1157 61.4%C Intersection Construction FY2012/2013 95.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East Collier Boulevard San Marco Drive 2U 608 C E 1,075 1,260 1,075 750 672 588 754 550 557 640 83 14.97%402 532 460 432 432 481 237 (244)877 198 81.6%D 2015 US41 Intersection imp & SR951 resurf 95.1 US41 Tamiami Trail East Collier Boulevard Joseph Lane 6D 608 D E 3,100 1,260 1,075 557 640 83 14.97%432 481 299 (182)939 2161 30.3%B Construction FY2013 95.2 US41 Tamiami Trail East Joseph Lane Greenway Road 4D 608 D E 2,000 1,260 1,075 390 448 58 14.87%432 481 299 (182)747 1253 37.4%C .70 times the total of 95.1 95.3 US41 Tamiami Trail East Greenway Road San Marco Drive 2U 608 D E 1,075 1,260 1,075 180 192 12 6.67%432 481 299 (182)491 584 45.7%B .30 times the total of 95.1 96.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East San Marco Drive SR 29 2U 617A D E 1,000 1,000 1,075 230 298 200 200 232 222 160 (62)-28.01%10 19 14 14 18 5 0 (5)160 840 16.0%B 97.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East SR 29 Dade County Line 2U 616A D E 1,000 1,000 875 180 241 165 165 210 185 140 (45)-24.24%3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 143 857 14.3%B 98.0 71 US41 Tamiami Trail North Lee County Line Wiggins Pass Road 6D 546 E N 3,100 3,000 3,300 2,380 2,143 2,091 2,046 1,763 1,812 1,870 58 3.21%148 310 274 274 274 84 97 13 1,967 1133 63.5%C Northwest TCMA 99.0 50 US41 Tamiami Trail North Wiggins Pass Road Immokalee Road 6D 564 E N 3,100 3,000 3,520 2,890 2,864 2,800 2,688 2,711 2,541 2,540 (1)-0.04%380 537 399 399 414 358 353 (5)2,893 207 93.3%D 2017 Northwest TCMA 100.0 45 US41 Tamiami Trail North Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 6D 577 E N 3,100 2,800 3,370 2,720 2,616 2,453 2,103 2,643 2,239 2,140 (99)-4.42%434 437 311 311 323 0 0 0 2,140 960 69.0%C Northwest TCMA 101.0 45 US41 Tamiami Trail North Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulf Park Drive 6D 563 E N 3,100 2,900 3,440 2,470 2,211 2,263 2,180 2,261 2,179 2,240 61 2.80%230 210 194 202 202 202 193 (9)2,433 667 78.5%D Northwest TCMA 102.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Gulf Park Drive Pine Ridge Road 6D 562 E N 3,100 3,000 3,550 2,270 2,398 2,093 2,003 1,982 2,000 2,240 240 12.00%187 174 167 167 167 165 165 0 2,405 695 77.6%D Northwest TCMA 103.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Pine Ridge Road Solana Road 2,900 3,410 2,810 2,549 2,428 1,748 1,770 89 86 64 64 96 70 70 0 City of Naples 104.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Solana Road Creech Road 2,900 3,470 52 48 48 48 48 31 31 31 0 City of Naples 105.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Creech Road Golden Gate Parkway 2,800 3,320 60 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 0 City of Naples 106.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Golden Gate Parkway Central Avenue 3,000 3,860 73 65 53 53 53 53 53 0 City of Naples 107.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Central Avenue Four Corners 2,600 3,880 54 48 48 48 48 48 48 City of Naples 108.0 Thomasson Drive Bayshore Drive Tamiami Trail 2U 698 D E 800 800 760 470 356 419 420 1 0.19%105 108 60 60 58 58 105 47 525 275 65.6%C TCEA 109.0 42 65071 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulfshore Drive Tamiami Trail 2U/4D 524 E E 1,400 900 1,290 1,020 920 869 929 863 838 890 52 6.16%92 79 61 61 61 61 61 0 951 449 67.9%C Northwest TCMA 110.1 23 67021 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Tamiami Trail Goodlette-Frank Road 4D 646 D E 1,900 1,900 1,820 1,500 1,500 1,361 1,237 1,360 123 9.95%210 236 168 168 171 171 171 0 1,531 369 80.6%D Northwest TCMA 110.2 23 67021 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Goodlette-Frank Rd.Airport Road 4D/6D 666 D E 2,500 2,400 2,750 1,450 1,520 1,480 1,896 1,570 1,785 1,870 85 4.76%210 638 392 392 392 392 293 (99)2,163 337 86.5%D 2018 Northwest TCMA 111.1 63 63051 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Airport Road Livingston Rd.6D 579 E W 3,000 2,900 3,540 1,490 1,404 1,471 2,240 1,572 1,644 1,830 186 11.29%297 289 219 219 219 219 219 0 2,049 951 68.3%C Northwest TCMA 111.2 63 63051 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Livingston Rd.Logan Blvd.6D 668 E E 3,000 2,900 3,540 1,490 1,709 2,391 1,648 1,659 1,640 (19)-1.12%297 289 225 225 225 221 221 0 1,861 1139 62.0%C Northwest TCMA 112.0 24 63051 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 580 E E 3,000 2,900 3,600 890 624 751 890 953 1,089 1,210 121 11.11%258 236 245 245 245 227 229 2 1,439 1561 48.0%B 113.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 800 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #VALUE!n/a 0 n/a 114.0 25 69061 CR901 Vanderbilt Drive Bonita Beach Road Wiggins Pass Road 2U 548 D N 1,000 1,000 1,075 440 429 356 411 358 375 380 5 1.26%90 158 158 158 158 158 158 0 538 462 53.8%C Northwest TCMA 115.0 69061 CR901 Vanderbilt Drive Wiggins Pass Road 111th Avenue 2U 578 D N 1,000 1,000 1,150 420 436 412 440 370 374 380 6 1.51%51 58 58 58 58 58 58 0 438 562 43.8%B Northwest TCMA 116.0 26 69021 Westclox Rd Carson Rd SR 29 2U 611 D W 800 800 760 130 147 143 143 166 184 170 (14)-7.64%0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 630 21.3%B 117.0 99928 CR888 Wiggins Pass Road Vanderbilt Drive Tamiami Trail 2U 669 D E 1,000 800 1,050 380 386 375 437 364 353 360 7 2.10%97 139 131 131 133 133 133 0 493 507 49.3%B Northwest TCMA 118.0 Wilson Blvd Immokalee Road Golden Gate Blvd.2U 650 D S 900 900 920 610 505 391 351 280 259 270 11 4.23%120 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 270 630 30.0%B 119.0 60044 CR858 Oil Well Road Immokalee Road Everglades Boulevard 4D 725S D E 2,000 1,900 1,010 550 525 565 565 349 418 340 (78)-18.63%119 139 272 272 272 271 165 (106)505 1495 25.3%B Under Construction 120.0 60044 CR858 Oil Well Road Everglades Desoto 2U 694 D W 1,100 800 1,010 410 397 377 378 133 118 170 52 44.01%139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 930 15.5%B 121.0 60044 CR858 Oil Well Road DeSoto Camp Keais Road 2U 694 D E 800 1,100 1,010 410 397 377 378 133 118 170 52 44.01%144 0 0 51 51 0 170 630 21.3%B 121.1 Oil Well Road DeSoto Oil Well Grade 2U 694 D W 1,100 1,100 118 170 52 44.01%51 51 51 0 221 879 20.1%B 121.2 Oil Well Road Oil Well Grade Camp Keais 4D 694 D W 2,000 800 118 170 52 44.01%51 51 51 0 221 1779 11.1%D 122.0 Oil Well Road Camp Keais Road SR 29 2U 694 D W 800 1,100 1,010 410 397 377 378 133 118 170 52 44.01%144 0 0 51 51 42 42 0 212 588 26.5%B 123.0 60040 Golden Gate Blvd.Wilson E of Everglades 2U 652 D E 1,010 900 1,010 1,320 1,162 1,058 1,078 962 977 950 (27)-2.72%150 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 955 55 94.6%D 2016 Intersection Construction FY2014/2015 ROW 124.0 60040 Golden Gate Blvd.E of Everglades DeSoto 2U 652 D E 1,010 900 1,010 1,162 1,058 1,078 962 977 950 (27)-2.72%0 0 0 0 0 0 0 950 60 94.1%D 2017 ROW 125.0 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard 4D 535 D E 2,400 2,000 2,800 1,630 1,509 1,359 1,290 1,238 1,207 1,300 93 7.67%93 90 96 96 96 96 96 0 1,396 1004 58.2%C East Central TCMA 126.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #VALUE!n/a 0 n/a 127.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #VALUE!n/a 0 n/a 128.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #VALUE!n/a 0 n/a 129.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #VALUE!n/a 0 n/a 130.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #VALUE!n/a 0 n/a 131.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #VALUE!n/a 0 n/a 132.0 Randal Blvd.Immokalee Everglades 2U 651 D E 900 900 900 720 686 669 723 764 749 730 (19)-2.49%84 0 21 21 21 21 21 0 751 149 83.4%D 133.0 Randal Blvd.Everglades DeSoto 2U 651 D E 900 900 900 720 686 669 723 764 749 730 (19)-2.49%57 0 0 0 21 21 21 0 751 149 83.4%D 134.0 Everglades I-75 Golden Gate Blvd 2U 637S D S 800 1,100 900 420 336 370 341 305 308 370 62 19.99%23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 370 430 46.3%B 135.0 Everglades Golden Gate Blvd.Oil Well 2U 636S D N 800 900 900 480 330 299 299 304 264 270 6 2.38%74 7 7 7 7 7 7 0 277 523 34.6%B 136.0 Everglades Oil Well Immokalee 2U 635S D N 800 900 900 460 389 360 360 326 348 320 (28)-8.03%61 12 12 12 7 7 7 0 327 473 40.9%B 137.0 DeSoto Blvd.I-75 Golden Gate Blvd.2U 639A D S 800 1,100 900 120 95 92 115 92 103 120 17 16.83%20 0 0 0 12 12 12 0 132 668 16.5%B 138.0 DeSoto Blvd.Golden Gate Blvd.Oil Well Rd.2U 638A D S 800 800 900 120 109 75 75 87 80 80 (0)-0.49%16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 720 10.0%B 139.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #VALUE!n/a 0 n/a 140.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #VALUE!n/a 0 n/a 141.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 900 900 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a #VALUE!n/a 0 n/a 142.0 Orange Blossom Goodlette Airport 2D 647 D W 1,200 1,000 850 700 668 603 599 575 645 550 (95)-14.75%97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 550 650 45.8%B 143.0 Orange Blossom Airport Livingston Rd.2U 647 D W 1,000 900 920 700 668 603 599 575 645 550 (95)-14.75%97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 550 450 55.0%C 144.0 Shadowlawn Dr.Tamiami Trail Davis 2U 523 D N 800 700 770 280 268 259 261 252 231 230 (1)-0.61%32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 230 570 28.8%B 145.0 66066 Bridge Repairs/Improvements 147.0 60016 Intersection Safety/Capacity Improve 148.0 60172 Traffic Ops Enhancements 150.0 60163 Traffic Calming/Studies 151.0 69081 Pathways/Sidewalks Bike Lanes 152.0 35010 Transit Facility & Transfer Site 153.0 61010 Transit Enhancements 154.0 60077 Enhanced Resurfacing (Transfer to 101/111) 155.0 60077 Safety Enhancements 156.0 60003 Collector Roads/Minor Arterial Roads 157.0 60171 Advanced ROW 158.0 Transfers to other funds 159.0 Impact Fee Refunds 161.0 Debt Service Payments 162.0 Contigency * Items in RED are proposed projects, projects without prior year comparison, or are negative trips of remaining capacity Page 5206 of 5243 Attachment "F"57 58 61 63 64 65 66 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) Based on Adopted LOS, Trip Bank and Traffic Counts Peak 2023 2022 Net Percent 2023 2023 Traffic Hour 1 Peak Peak Change Change 2023 Counts + 2023 w/TB Counts Trip Bank Peak Dir Hour Hour In Volume In Volume Total Counts +Trip Bank Counts +L Year Year TCMA or Exist Cnt. Peak Service Peak Dir Peak Dir From From Trip Trip Bank Remaining Trip Bank O Expected Expected ID# CIE# TCEA Road# Link From To Road Sta. Std *Dir Volume Volume Volume 2022 2022 Bank Volume Capacity V/C S Deficient Deficient 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 # 12 13 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Min 41.2 6 NW-TCMA CR846 Immokalee Road Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road 6D 625 E E 3,100 2690 2410 280 10.41% 20 2710 390 87.4% D 2029 42.1 6 NW-TCMA CR846 Immokalee Road Airport Road Livingston Road 6D 567 E E 3,100 2830 2820 10 0.35% 6 2836 264 91.5% D 2028 2028 42.2 6 NW-TCMA CR846 Immokalee Road Livingston Road I-75 6D/8D 679 E E 3,500 3020 3160 -140 -4.64%56 3076 424 87.9% D 2030 43.1 8 CR846 Immokalee Road I-75 Logan Boulevard 6D/8D 701 E E 3,500 2590 2480 110 4.25% 505 3095 405 88.4% D 2030 43.2 CR846 Immokalee Road Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 656 E E 3,200 2870 2640 230 8.01% 682 3552 (352)111.0% F 2026 Existing 44.0 71 CR846 Immokalee Road Collier Boulevard Wilson Boulevard 6D 674 E E 3,300 2600 2540 60 2.31% 680 3280 20 99.4% E 2024 45.0 71 CR846 Immokalee Road Wilson Boulevard Oil Well Road 6D 675 E E 3,300 2370 2020 350 14.77% 516 2886 414 87.5% D 2030 46.0 73 CR846 Immokalee Road Oil Well Road SR 29 2U 672 D E 900 580 510 70 12.07% 249 829 71 92.1% D 2026 47.0 66 Lake Trafford Road Carson Rd SR 29 2U 609 D E 800 480 490 -10 -2.08%133 613 187 76.6% C 48.0 Logan Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 2U 587 D N 1,000 590 620 -30 -5.08%46 636 364 63.6% C 49.0 22 EC-TCMA Logan Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Green Boulevard 4D 588 D S 1,900 1550 1520 30 1.94% 0 1550 350 81.6% D 50.0 79 Logan Boulevard Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 2U 644 D N 1,000 760 670 90 11.84% 34 794 206 79.4% D 2031 51.0 21 NW-TCMA CR881 Livingston Road Imperial Street Immokalee Road 6/4D 673 D N 3,000 1600 1820 -220 -13.75%203 1803 1197 60.1% C 52.0 57 NW-TCMA CR881 Livingston Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 6D 576 E N 3,100 1740 2000 -260 -14.94%0 1740 1360 56.1% C 53.0 58 NW-TCMA CR881 Livingston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 6D 575 E N 3,100 1630 1530 100 6.13% 0 1630 1470 52.6% B 54.0 52 EC-TCMA CR881 Livingston Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway 6D 690 E N 3,100 1470 1360 110 7.48% 20 1490 1610 48.1% B 55.0 53 EC-TCMA CR881 Livingston Road Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 6D 687 E N 3,000 1760 1700 60 3.41% 23 1783 1217 59.4% C 58.0 67 N. 1st Street New Market Road SR-29 (Main Street) 2U 590 D N 900 660 680 -20 -3.03%24 684 216 76.0% C 59.0 New Market Road Broward Street SR 29 2U 612 D E 900 750 670 80 10.67% 22 772 128 85.8% D 2028 61.0 36 Camp Keais Oil Well Road Immokalee Road 2U 626A D S 1,000 330 300 30 9.09% 211 541 459 54.1% B 62.0 68 NW-TCMA CR887 Old US 41 Lee County Line US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 547 D N 1,000 1120 1200 -80 -7.14%7 1127 (127)112.7% F Existing Existing 63.0 NW-TCMA CR896 Seagate Drive Crayton Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 4D 511 D E 1,700 920 960 -40 -4.35%0 920 780 54.1% B 64.0 14 NW-TCMA CR896 Pine Ridge Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road 6D 512 E E 2,800 2060 1970 90 4.37% 6 2066 734 73.8% C 65.0 14 NW-TCMA CR896 Pine Ridge Road Goodlette-Frank Road Shirley Street 6D 514 E E 2,800 2290 2360 -70 -3.06%3 2293 507 81.9% D 66.0 14 NW-TCMA CR896 Pine Ridge Road Shirley Street Airport Road 6D 515 E E 2,800 3270 3060 210 6.42% 21 3291 (491)117.5% F Existing Existing 67.1 41 NW-TCMA CR896 Pine Ridge Road Airport Road Livingston Road 6D 526 E E 3,900 3600 3480 120 3.33% 17 3617 283 92.7% D 2028 2027 67.2 41 EC-TCMA CR896 Pine Ridge Road Livingston Road I-75 6D 628 E E 3,900 2840 2800 40 1.41% 35 2875 1025 73.7% C 68.0 41 EC-TCMA CR896 Pine Ridge Road I-75 Logan Boulevard 6D 600 E E 2,800 2470 2360 110 4.45% 0 2470 330 88.2% D 2030 69.0 15 CR856 Radio Road Airport Road Livingston Road 4D 544 D E 1,800 1050 1110 -60 -5.71%57 1107 693 61.5% C 70.0 15 EC-TCMA CR856 Radio Road Livingston Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 527 D E 1,800 1560 1580 -20 -1.28%18 1578 222 87.7% D 2030 71.0 16 EC-TCMA CR856 Radio Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard 4D 685 D W 1,800 680 650 30 4.41% 89 769 1031 42.7% B 72.0 17 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Charlemagne Boulevard 4D 516 D E 1,800 1190 1080 110 9.24% 84 1274 526 70.8% C 73.0 17 TCEA(pt) CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Charlemagne Boulevard County Barn Road 4D 517 D E 1,800 940 920 20 2.13% 59 999 801 55.5% B 74.0 17 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road County Barn Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 534 D E 1,900 900 840 60 6.67% 74 974 926 51.3% B 75.0 77 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 518 E W 2,900 720 770 -50 -6.94%157 877 2023 30.2% B 76.0 56 EC-TCMA Santa Barbara Boulevard Green Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway 4D 529 D N 2,100 1570 1530 40 2.55% 14 1584 516 75.4% C 77.0 56 EC-TCMA Santa Barbara Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 6D 528 E N 3,100 2100 2060 40 1.90% 52 2152 948 69.4% C 78.0 56 EC-TCMA Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Road Davis Boulevard 6D 537 E N 3,100 1720 1560 160 9.30% 226 1946 1154 62.8% C 79.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake-Hammock Road 6D 702 E S 3,100 1010 1000 10 0.99% 319 1329 1771 42.9% B 80.0 SR29 SR 29 US 41 (Tamiami Trail) CR 837 (Janes Scenic Dr) 2U 615A D N 900 160 170 -10 -6.25%0 160 740 17.8% B 81.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 837 (Janes Scenic Dr) I-75 2U 615A D N 900 160 170 -10 -6.25%0 160 740 17.8% B 82.0 SR29 SR 29 I-75 Oil Well Road 2U 615A D N 900 160 170 -10 -6.25%67 227 673 25.2% B 83.0 SR29 SR 29 Oil Well Road CR 29A South 2U 665A D N 900 530 480 50 9.43% 118 648 252 72.0% C 84.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 29A South 9th Street 4D 664 D W 1,700 560 610 -50 -8.93%201 761 939 44.8% B 85.0 SR29 SR 29 9th Street CR 29A North 2U 663 D S 900 690 660 30 4.35% 146 836 64 92.9% D 2028 86.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 29A North SR 82 2U 663 D S 900 690 660 30 4.35% 68 758 142 84.2% D 2033 87.0 SR29 SR 29 Hendry County Line SR 82 2U 591A D S 800 300 300 0 0.00% 10 310 490 38.8% B 88.0 SR82 SR 82 Lee County Line SR 29 2U 661A D S 800 950 958 -8 -0.84%55 1005 (205)125.6% F Existing Existing 91.0 43 TCEA US41 Tamiami Trail East Davis Boulevard Airport Road 6D 545 E E 2,900 1700 1730 -30 -1.76%200 1900 1000 65.5% C MASTER Attachment F-2023 PUBLIC Page 5207 of 5243 Listed Species Survey revised Property Numbers: 00127520007 00127564005 Legal Descriptions: 4 47 29 W 210FT OF E 450FT OF S 660FT OF NW 1/4 NW1/4 LESS AS DESC IN OR 3318 PG 2074 AND LESS N 210FT. 4 47 29 S 435 FT OF SE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 LESS E 450FT LESS W 15FT OF S 230FT OF SE 1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 LESS E 450 FT Collier County, FL Prepared for: SAINVILUS, JAMES February 2, 2024 Report valid 90 days. Field survey and report completed by: Tropical Environmental Consultants 3899 Mannix Dr. #118 Naples, FL 34114 (239) 455-6232 Page 5208 of 5243 Listed Species Survey – Collier County Property Numbers 00127520007, 00127564005 I. INTRODUCTION Tropical Environmental Consultants (TEC) conducted a species survey on the subject properties located at 1300 ROBERTS AVE W IMMOKALEE FL 34142 (west parcel) as well as the abutting vacant land (property number 00127520007; Figure 1) The site is located within Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) codes 740 Disturbed Lands with abutting code 111 Fixed Single Family Units (Figure 2, Map -A3). The site is located within the Consultation and focal area for various species with the habitat on the lot particularly suitable for Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus). An abbreviated outline of the animal’s biology is inset below: A medium-sized turtle (to 10 in. = 254 mm) fully adapted for life on land. Upper shell brown and relatively flat above; lower shell yellowish, without hinge, and projecting forward, especially in male; skin brown to dark gray. Forelimbs greatly expanded for digging; hind limbs reduced, stumpy, lacking any form of webbing between toes. Lower shell of male somewhat concave. Young: scales of carapace often with yellow centers, skin yellowish to tan; approximately 2 in. (51 mm) shell length at hatching (FNAI 2018). The present survey was conducted to determine the potential or actual occupancy of Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) in accordance with Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission regulation provided in the state permitting guidelines. Figure 1. Location of survey in Collier County, Florida with subject parcels identified in yellow. Page 5209 of 5243 Listed Species Survey – Collier County Property Numbers 00127520007, 00127564005 Fig 2. Images of Collier County Property Nos. 00127520007, 00127564005 Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) codes 740 Disturbed Lands (A) with abutting code 111 Fixed Single Family Units (B,C). II. METHODS TEC staff conducted transects, oriented from east to west, ensuring 100 percent visual coverage of the site. Transects were spaced 15’ apart and did not include areas within the 25 ft. buffer surrounding the subject parcels. Photos were taken of all identified tortoise burrows and assessed as “Abandoned” or “Potentially Occupied” as per FWC guidelines. Photographs of the burrows are provided in Figure 3. These statuses are differentiated as “An abandoned burrow appears unused and dilapidated. The en- trance is partially or completely collapsed, and the burrow is partially or completely filled with leaves or soil. Recent rains, or recent activity by livestock or humans, do not appear to be the primary reason for burrow collapse. The burrow may lack the classic half-moon shaped entrance. Abandoned burrows must be recorded on burrow location maps but not included in tortoise density calculations.” III. RESULTS A total of one occupied gopher tortoise burrows were recorded within the assessment area (i.e; the parcel and a 25 foot surrounding buffer; Map - A1). No abandoned burrows were recorded during the survey. The burrow was documented with a sequential inventory and flagged in the field with pink flagging tape labeled with number, status and location marked by GPS coordinates (Figure 3; Map - A1). The primary considerations related to the presence of the Gopher tortoise on the parcel are summarized however permitting procedures are required prior to potential development of the parcel: Gopher tortoises, their eggs, and burrows are protected by state law, Chapter 68A – 27.003, FL Administrative Code, which prohibits the take, molestation, or harassment of tortoises and Page 5210 of 5243 Listed Species Survey – Collier County Property Numbers 00127520007, 00127564005 their nests unless authorized by a Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) permit and any works will have to remain at a minimum distance of 25 ft away from the burrow (Map – A2). If the burrows cannot be avoided by more than 25 ft, then either of the two following permits will be required: o On-site relocation permits are required where 10 or fewer burrows within 25 ft of final site plan. o Off-site relocation permits are required where greater than 10 burrows are within 25 ft of final site plan. Because the burrow/animal is located in the pathway of the tracks of an access gate, it is strongly advised that the gate is not operated until the animal is relocated. Fig 3. Image of Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Burrow recorded at Collier County Property Nos. 00127520007, 00127564005 during site survey. Page 5211 of 5243 Listed Species Survey – Collier County Property Numbers 00127520007, 00127564005 Map - A1. Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrow identified on Property Nos. 00127520007, 00127564005. Burrows are identified with sequential inventory (number) proceeding potentially occupied (PO) and abandoned (AB) status. Burrow identified by orange point mark. Page 5212 of 5243 Listed Species Survey – Collier County Property Numbers 00127520007, 00127564005 Map – A2. Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrow identified on Property Nos. 00127520007, 00127564005 with the surrounding 25 ft. diameter buffer required to avoid impacts/permitting. Burrows are identified using orange point marks and buffers are designated within opaque orange. Buffers are only located in relation to potentially occupied burrows. Page 5213 of 5243 Listed Species Survey – Collier County Property Numbers 00127520007, 00127564005 Map – A3. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) codes within Collier County Property Nos. 00127520007, 00127564005. Page 5214 of 5243 Listed Species Survey – Collier County Property Numbers 00127520007, 00127564005 Map – A4. Transect Map with Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrow identified on Property Nos.00127520007, 00127564005. Red lines depicts the transects taken during listed species survey. Page 5215 of 5243 Listed Species Survey – Collier County Property Numbers 00127520007, 00127564005 IV. Parcel Data Page 5216 of 5243 Listed Species Survey – Collier County Property Numbers 00127520007, 00127564005 Page 5217 of 5243 82 82 29 Pepper Ranch Pr eser v e F e l d a Lake Trafford Corkscrew Swamp Baucom Cypress Strand 846 I m m o k a l e e 29 1-YEAR 2-YEAR 5-YEAR 1-YEAR 2-YEAR 5-YEAR1-YEAR 2-YEAR 5-YEAR 20-YEAR 20-YEAR State of Florida, Maxar, University of South Florida, County of Collier, FDEP, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, USDA, USFWS ± 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,0002,500 Feet Notes: 1. This exhibit is for permitting purposes only. 2. Property data obtained from Collier County Property Appraiser. 3. SEC 4 TWN 47 RGE 29 4. Parcel Id. 00127520007, 00127564005 5. Abbreviations: AC=Acres Wellfield Overlay Map Exhibit Created: 16FEB2024 By Bob Clarke Tropical Environmental Consultants LEE - 28200 Old 41 Road #209, Bonita Springs FL 34135 COLLIER - 3900 Mannix Drive #118, Naples FL 34114 Office: (239) 455-6232 Direct: (239) 558-3106 https://tropicalenvironmentalconsultants.com/ PARCEL ID. 00127520007 PARCEL ID. 00127564005 1300 ROBERTS AVE W IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 Legend Property Boundary (4.309 Ac.) Existing Wellfields Page 5218 of 5243 FDEP,WRM, ERP, FDEPCadastral 2023 (Property Appraiser Parcels) - Public ViewEnvironmental Resource Permits (ERP) from PAERPEnvironmental Resource Permits (2007-present)ERP - Currently PermittedFebruary 16, 202400.050.10.03 mi0 0.08 0.160.04 km1:2,257Map created by Map Direct, powered by ESRI.Florida Department of Environmental Protection makes no warranty,expressed or implied,or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy,completeness,or usefulness of any information,apparatus,product,or process disclosed,or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.Page 5219 of 5243 86*HRORJLFDO6XUYH\$HULDO,PDJHU\ &ROOLHU&RXQW\)/)ROLR1RVPage 5220 of 5243 0DSZLVH$HULDO,PDJHU\ &ROOLHU&RXQW\)/)ROLR1RVPage 5221 of 5243 0DSZLVH$HULDO,PDJHU\ &ROOLHU&RXQW\)/)ROLR1RVPage 5222 of 5243 FDEP,WRM, ERP, FREAC, FDEPCadastral 2023 (Property Appraiser Parcels) - Public ViewEnvironmental Resource Permits (ERP) from PAERPEnvironmental Resource Permits (2007-present)ERP - Currently PermittedFebruary 16, 202400.050.10.03 mi0 0.08 0.160.04 km1:2,257Map created by Map Direct, powered by ESRI.Florida Department of Environmental Protection makes no warranty,expressed or implied,or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy,completeness,or usefulness of any information,apparatus,product,or process disclosed,or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.Page 5223 of 5243 0D[DU7HFKQRORJLHV$HULDO,PDJHU\&ROOLHU&RXQW\)/)ROLR1RVPage 5224 of 5243 Page 5225 of 5243 CANON SANDORA CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. SAINVILUS PUDZ February 27th, 2025 canon@cs-ce.com ∙ (239)-692-6738 ∙ 9201 Tangelo Blvd., Fort Myers, FL 33967 Requested Deviations & Justifications Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N Street System Requirements, which requires minimum local street right-of-way width of 60 feet, to allow a 45 foot right-of-way width for the internal streets that with a 10 foot public utility easement on both sides of the right-of-way. Justification: The proposed right-of-way is for a dead-end road which only serves the proposed PUD development. The proposed local road is 24 feet wide, with 5 foot sidewalks on either side, leaving 11 feet for open space within the proposed 45 foot right-of-way. Page 5226 of 5243 Page 5227 of 5243 Sainvilus Subdivision PUDZ PL20230016622 February 27th, 2025 Page 1 of 11 EXHIBIT A LIST OF PERMITTED USES SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION RPUD A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Regulations for development of this PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document and all applicable sections of the Growth Management Plan (GMD), the Land Development Code (LDC), and the Administrative Code in effect at the time of approval of the Site Development Plan (SDP) or plat. Where the PUD ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provision of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. PERMITTED USES: A maximum of 27 single-family dwelling units (6 units per acre) shall be permitted in this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Residential Detached single-family units Attached single-family units (zero lot line) 2. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Customary accessory uses associated with the principal uses permitted in this PUD, including but not limited to garages, carports, swimming pools, spas, screen enclosures, sheds, utility buildings and infrastructure. 2. Walls, berms, signage, and development excavations for stormwater drainage detention/retention areas. 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas. Page 5228 of 5243 Sainvilus Subdivision PUDZ PL20230016622 February 27th, 2025 Page 2 of 11 4. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. Page 5229 of 5243 Sainvilus Subdivision PUDZ PL20230016622 February 27th, 2025 Page 3 of 11 EXHIBIT B LIST OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The standards for land uses within the development shall be as stated in these development standard tables. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. Table 1 below sets forth the development standards for the land uses within the Sainvilus Subdivision RPUD. TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY (ZERO LOT LINE) PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA 3,500 SF 3,500 SF MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 45 FEET 45 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,000 SF 1,000 SF MINIMUM FRONT YARD 23 FEET 23 FEET MINIMUM SIDE YARD 7.5 FEET 0/7.5 FEET MINIMUM REAR YARD 17 FEET 17 FEET MINIMUM EXTERNAL BOUNDARY SETBACK 15 FEET 15 FEET MINIMUM PRESERVE SETBACK N/A N/A MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 10 FEET 10 FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT ZONED ACTUAL 35 FEET 40 FEET 35 FEET 40 FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURES MINIMUM FRONT YARD 20 FEET 20 FEET MINIMUM SIDE YARD 5 FEET 5 FEET MINIMUM REAR YARD 5 FEET 5 FEET MINIMUM PRESERVE SETBACK N/A N/A MINIMUM EXTERNAL BOUNDARY SETBACK 15 FEET 15 FEET Maximum Height Zoned Actual 35 FEET 40 FEET 35 FEET 40 FEET Page 5230 of 5243 Sainvilus Subdivision PUDZ PL20230016622 February 27th, 2025 Page 4 of 11 GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners’ association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. Landscape buffers and lake maintenance easements shall be platted as separate tracts at time of subdivision plat approval. Note: Nothing in this PUD document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in a list of deviations, Exhibit E-1. Page 5231 of 5243 Sainvilus Subdivision PUDZ PL20230016622 February 27th, 2025 Page 5 of 11 EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN Page 5232 of 5243 CANON SANDORACIVIL ENGINEERING, INC.NO. DESCRIPTION DATEPROJECT:SAINVILUSSUBDIVISIONPROJECT NO. 23-022 DATE 4/15/24 BY CGS/JS SHEET 6 OF 11 SCALE 1"=50'ENGINEER: CANON SANDORA, PESTATE OF FLORIDA LICENSE # 953039201 TANGELO BLVD. FT. MYERS, FL 33967CANON@CS-CE.COM WWW.CS-CE.COM(239)-692-6738PROPERTY OWNER:SAINVILUSEXHIBIT CMASTER PLANSITE DENSITY ALLOWABLE BASE DENSITY: 6 UNITS/AC X 4.52 AC = 27 UNITS NOTES 1) THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AT THE TIME OF AGENCY PERMITTING, PLAT APPROVAL, OR DEVELOPMENT ORDER. HOWEVER, ANY SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDC) DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES. 2) NO PRESERVATION REQUIRED. REQUESTED DEVIATION DEVIATION #1 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.01.N STREET SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS, WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM LOCAL STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH OF 60 FEET, TO ALLOW A 45 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH FOR THE INTERNAL STREET WITH A 10 FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ON BOTH SIDES OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT E-2. DEVIATION #2 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC APPENDIX B TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS, WHICH REQUIRES VALLEY GUTTERS ON BOTH SIDES OF A LOCAL STREET, TO ALLOW FOR AN INVERTED CROWN LOCAL STREET AS DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT E-2, WHICH WILL SLOPE AT LEAST 0.5% LONGITUDINALLY TO DRAINAGE STRUCTURE(S) IN THE CENTER OF THE LOCAL STREET. ZONING:RSF-5 FLU: MR USE: SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ZONING: RSF-3 FLU: MR USE: SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ZONING: RSF-3 FLU: CMU USE: VACANT ZONING: MPUD FLU: CMU USE: SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES KEY - DEVIATION - ACCESS R - RESIDENTIAL TRACT LAND USE CALCULATIONS RESIDENTIAL 3.64 AC RIGHT-OF-WAY 0.88 AC TOTAL 4.52 AC PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPERTY BOUNDARY 15' TYPE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15' TYPE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15' TYPE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15' TYPE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE REQUIRED: 2.71 AC (60%) OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 2.71 AC (60%) NOTES 1) THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AT THE TIME OF AGENCY PERMITTING, PLAT APPROVAL, OR DEVELOPMENT ORDER. HOWEVER, ANY SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDC) DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES. 2) NO PRESERVATION REQUIRED. SITE DENSITY ALLOWABLE BASE DENSITY: 6 UNITS/AC X 4.52 AC = 27 UNITS NOTES 1) THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AT THE TIME OF AGENCY PERMITTING, PLAT APPROVAL, OR DEVELOPMENT ORDER. HOWEVER, ANY SUCH MODIFICATIONS REQUESTED DEVIATION DEVIATION #1 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.01.N STREET SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS, WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM LOCAL STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH OF 60 FEET, TO ALLOW A 45 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH FOR THE INTERNAL STREET WITH A 10 FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ON BOTH SIDES OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT E-2. DEVIATION #2 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC APPENDIX B TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS, WHICH REQUIRES VALLEY GUTTERS ON BOTH SIDES OF A LOCAL STREET, TO ALLOW FOR AN INVERTED CROWN LOCAL STREET AS DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT E-2, WHICH WILL SLOPE AT LEAST 0.5% LONGITUDINALLY TO DRAINAGE STRUCTURE(S) IN THE CENTER OF THE LOCAL STREET. LAND USE CALCULATIONS RESIDENTIAL 3.64 AC RIGHT-OF-WAY 0.88 AC TOTAL 4.52 AC OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE REQUIRED: 2.71 AC (60%) OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 2.71 AC (60%) NOTES 1) THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AT THE TIME OF AGENCY PERMITTING, PLAT APPROVAL, OR DEVELOPMENT ORDER. HOWEVER, ANY SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDC) DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES. 2) NO PRESERVATION REQUIRED. Page 5233 of 5243 Sainvilus Subdivision PUDZ PL20230016622 February 27th, 2025 Page 7 of 11 EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL ID # 00127564005: PARCEL 1 THE SOUTH 205.00 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: THE SOUTHEAST ¼ OF THE NORTHWEST ¼ OF THE NORTHWEST ¼ OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, EXCEPT THE EAST 450.00 FEET AND THE SOUTH 230.00 FEET. AND THE SOUTH 230’ OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, EXCEPT THE EAST 450’ THEREOF AND SUBJECT TO RIGHT OF WAY COUNTY ROAD OVER AND ALONG SOUTH 30 FEET. LYING AND BEING IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS THE WESTERLY 15 FEET THEREOF FOR UTILITY EASEMENT. PARCEL ID # 00121520003 PARCEL 2 THE WESTERLY 15 FEET OF THE SOUTH 230 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, SUBJECT TO RIGHT OF WAY OF COUNTY ROAD OVER AND ALONG THE SOUTH 30 FEET. PARCEL ID # 00127565509 & 00127520007: THE WEST 210 FEET OF THE EAST 450 FEET OF THE SOUTH 660 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST ¼ OF THE NORTHWEST ¼ OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. LESS BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE WEST 210 FEET OF THE EAST 450 FEET OF THE SOUTH 660 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER (NW ¼) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER (NW ¼) THENCE NORTHERLY FOR 140.12 FEET TO AN EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG AN EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE, FOR 210.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, LEAVING SAID CHAIN LINK FENCE FOR 126.17 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY FOR 210.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 4.52 Total Acres Page 5234 of 5243 Sainvilus Subdivision PUDZ PL20230016622 February 27th, 2025 Page 8 of 11 EXHIBIT E-1 LIST OF DEVIATIONS Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N Street System Requirements, which requires A minimum local street right-of-way width of 60 feet, to allow a 45 foot right-of- way width for the internal streets with a 10 foot public utility easement on both sides of the right-of-way, as depicted in Exhibit E-2. Page 5235 of 5243 CANON SANDORACIVIL ENGINEERING, INC.NO. DESCRIPTION DATEPROJECT:SAINVILUSSUBDIVISIONPROJECT NO. 23-022 DATE 4/15/24 BY CGS/JS SHEET 9 OF 11 NTSENGINEER: CANON SANDORA, PESTATE OF FLORIDA LICENSE # 953039201 TANGELO BLVD. FT. MYERS, FL 33967CANON@CS-CE.COM WWW.CS-CE.COM(239)-692-6738PROPERTY OWNER:SAINVILUSEXHIBIT E-2CROSS SECTIONPage 5236 of 5243 Sainvilus Subdivision PUDZ PL20230016622 February 27th, 2025 Page 10 of 11 EXHIBIT F LIST OF DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS PURPOSE: The purposed of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of this project. 1. GENERAL: A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is SAINVILUS, LLC and/or its successors assigns. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. B. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. (Section 125.022, FS) C. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 2. TRANSPORTATION: A. The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 29 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. B. A maximum of three units will access the development directly from Roberts Ave. West, as shown on the Master Concept Plan. The existing residential unit will be removed at time of Plat approval. Page 5237 of 5243 Sainvilus Subdivision PUDZ PL20230016622 February 27th, 2025 Page 11 of 11 3. LANDSCAPING: The PUD shall provide a buffers on all sides of development, as shown on the Master Concept Plan. 4. ENVIRONMENTAL: One gopher tortoise was found which will be removed, but no other listed or endangered species were found on the property. The site is mostly cleared. Therefore, no preserve area is necessary. 5. PUBLIC UTILITIES: Development in the PUD will be serviced by the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. Page 5238 of 5243 SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTTONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COLNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel lbr a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the tirst public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, hor.vever these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrativ'e Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely a{fixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other shucture. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. tfthe sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFF,IDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORI(NG DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSICNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COLNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED wHo oN OATH SAYS THAT HEISr{E HAS POSTED PROPERNOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTTON i0.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEYELOPMENT CODE ON TTIE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NLIMBER ii CIa 00i ilEoo V,ll^ 6nnil il(321| SIGN OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX NAME (TYPED OR PRTNTED)t CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COLTNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was swom to and subscribed before me this 1-' ' day Cnlt/ol S ftt/port-h .1.20*LJ, by @, personally known to me or who pmduce a ?t )r,)er ir.e-ll'(- *identification and who did/did not take an oath. VINCENT SARDO III MY COMMISSION # HH457230 EXPIIi.ES: aaober 23. 2027 of Notary Public ,: iL:it^rLt.!,!i\f, My Commission Expires: tLt/ t>/)^22-7 (Stamp with serial mrmber) Rev.3/4/2015 Name of Notary t <erJ rtT- Page 5239 of 5243 SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTTONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COLNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel lbr a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the tirst public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, hor.vever these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrativ'e Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely a{fixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other shucture. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. tfthe sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFF,IDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORI(NG DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSICNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COLNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED wHo oN OATH SAYS THAT HEISr{E HAS POSTED PROPERNOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTTON i0.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEYELOPMENT CODE ON TTIE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NLIMBER ii CIa 00i ilEoo V,ll^ 6nnil il(321| SIGN OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX NAME (TYPED OR PRTNTED)t CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COLTNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was swom to and subscribed before me this 1-' ' day Cnlt/ol S ftt/port-h .1.20*LJ, by @, personally known to me or who pmduce a ?t )r,)er ir.e-ll'(- *identification and who did/did not take an oath. VINCENT SARDO III MY COMMISSION # HH457230 EXPIIi.ES: aaober 23. 2027 of Notary Public ,: iL:it^rLt.!,!i\f, My Commission Expires: tLt/ t>/)^22-7 (Stamp with serial mrmber) Rev.3/4/2015 Name of Notary t <erJ rtT- Page 5240 of 5243 Page 5241 of 5243 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) commencing at 9:00 A.M. on May 13, 2025, in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL, to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DISTRICT-3 (RSF-3) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONE W-4 (ST/W-4) TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONE W-4 (ST/W-4) TO BE KNOWN AS SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION RPUD TO ALLOW UP TO 27 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON 4.52± ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET WEST OF NORTH 11TH STREET BETWEEN ROBERTS AVENUE WEST AND FORRESTER AVENUE IN IMMOKALEE, IN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (PL20230016622) A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. Page 5242 of 5243 All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of 7 days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov/our-county/visitors/calendar-of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.Willig@colliercountyfl.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BURT L. SAUNDERS, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By: Yani Fernandez, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Page 5243 of 5243