Loading...
Agenda 04/22/2025 Item #17 B (Ordinance - Establish the Horse Trials Community Development District (CDD) by adoption of an ordinance (PL20250000514))4/22/2025 Item # 17.B ID# 2025-1035 Executive Summary Recommendation to approve an Ordinance establishing the Horse Trials Community Development District on 1,767.35± acres located north of County Road 858 (Oil Well Road), west of State Road 29, and east of Ranch One Road in Sections 7, 8, 17, and 18, Township 48 South, Range 30 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20250000514] OBJECTIVE: Review and consider a petition for an Ordinance to establish the Horse Trials Community Development District (CDD) by adoption of an ordinance. CONSIDERATIONS: The proposed CDD encompasses approximately 1,767.35 acres of land, and fully includes the 1,217.84+ acres of land comprising the proposed Stewardship Receiving Area (SRA). A map showing the location of the land area to be serviced by the District appears as Exhibit “1” in the petition. A metes and bounds description of the proposed CDD can be found in Exhibit “2” of the petition. On January 15, 2025, Jonathan T. Johnson of Kutak Rock, L.L.P., on behalf of Collier Land Holdings, LTD, a Florida limited partnership, and CDC Investment Properties, a Florida limited liability company (the “Petitioner”), submitted a petition to the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, requesting the establishment of the Horse Trials Community Development District, in order to manage and finance certain basic infrastructure for the benefit of the landowners and residents of the proposed Horse Trials SRA. The statutorily required $15,000 application fee was submitted with the petition. The proposed CDD includes an area planned for development of approximately 3,205 residential units, 282,000 square feet of non-residential development, a school facility, and a fire station within the 1,767.35+ acres. Exhibit “6” of the petition shows the proposed development plan for lands within the District. By adopting the ordinance and granting the petition, the District is authorized through its Board of Supervisors to manage and finance certain basic infrastructure for the benefit of the landowners and residents of the Horse Trials development. This infrastructure, under section 190.012(1), Florida Statutes, includes basic urban systems, facilities, and services, including potable water supply, sewers and wastewater management, surface water control and management (drainage), irrigation quality water distribution, and roads, bridges, and streetlights. If adopted, this ordinance would consent to the further exercise of certain additional special powers authorized by Section 190.012(2), Florida Statutes, to plan, establish, acquire, construct, reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate and maintain systems and facilities for: a) parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural and educational uses; and b) security, including, but not limited to, guard-houses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion-detection systems, and patrol cars; provided, however, that the District may not exercise any police power, but may contract with the appropriate local general purpose government agencies for an increased level of such services within the District boundaries; and c) control and elimination of mosquitoes and other arthropods of public health importance. The petitioner shall commit to providing disclosure to purchasers, acknowledging that the CDD may levy and impose special assessments upon landowners. The final assessment amounts will be market-driven and will be based on market acceptance, the amount of bonds ultimately issued, and the amount of the bonds paid down by the developer at closings. No exact amounts are determinable at this time, and will not be determinable until the bonds are issued, as much as a year or more after the District is established. The District Board of Supervisors is initially elected in a property-based election (one-acre, one-vote), which has been specifically ruled constitutional (State of Florida v. Frontier Acres Community Development Dist., 472 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 1985)). By operation of law, after six (6) years of duration and at least 250 registered electors residing within the District, the Supervisors are elected on a one-person, one-vote basis by such registered electors. In order to provide the basic systems, facilities, and services, the District has certain management and financing powers. It may only exercise those powers, however, if they comply with certain strict and detailed procedural requirements, including ethics in government, disclosure, conflict of interest requirements, notice of meetings, government-in-the- sunshine conduct, accounting and reporting requirements to various local and state agencies, consultants' competitive negotiation procedures, competitive bidding procedures and others. Page 5831 of 6355 4/22/2025 Item # 17.B ID# 2025-1035 To provide these systems, facilities and services, the District is also given certain eminent domain powers, within tight constraints, as well as the authority to require service charges, fees or taxes for the various services rendered, ranging from installation of capital facilities to long-term maintenance and repair. Without the County's consent, the aforementioned eminent domain power is limited to the boundaries of the District. Accordingly, if Collier County adopts the ordinance, then it establishes the Horse Trials Community Development District as a management tool to benefit both Collier County's existing and future landowners with pinpointed responsibility for timely, efficient, reliable, and flexible service provision without burdening the existing taxpayers and the financial structure of Collier County. In addition, the District is a financing tool of the balance sheet of Collier County and the developer. It will provide long-range and sustained quality service to initial and subsequent landowners without burdening Collier County and its taxpayers. Finally, such a District may not outlive its practical utility and usefulness. If, at any time during its existence, Collier County determines by a non-emergency ordinance that it can provide any one of the District's services in a more economical manner, over the long term, at lower cost but with higher quality, Collier County may then rescind the service provided by the District and provide the service itself. Additionally, within five (5) years of the effective date of the Ordinance establishing the District, if a landowner has not received a development permit as defined in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, on some part or all of the area encompassed by the District, it will automatically be disbanded by state law. Also, if the District becomes inactive pursuant to section 189.062, Florida Statutes, Collier County shall be informed of such an occurrence and shall take appropriate action, which may include the dissolution of the District. Finally, if the District has no outstanding financial obligations and no operating or maintenance responsibilities, upon petition of the District, Collier County may determine by a non-emergency ordinance to dissolve the District. Section 190.005, Florida Statutes provides that the exclusive and uniform method for the establishment of a CDD of less than 2,500 acres shall be by county ordinance. Section 190.005, Florida Statutes outlines the specific content required in the petition and further outlines six (6) factors for the Board of County Commissioners to consider in determining whether to grant or deny a petition for the establishment of a CDD, as follows: 1. Whether all statements contained within the petition have been found to be true and correct. 2. Whether the creation of the District is inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government comprehensive plan. 3. Whether the area of land within the proposed District is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community. 4. Whether the District is the best alternative available for delivering community development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the District. 5. Whether the community development services and facilities of the District will be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community development services and facilities. 6. Whether the area that will be served by the District is amenable to a separate special District government. County legal and planning staff have reviewed the petition and exhibits submitted by the petitioner (attached) relative to these six (6) factors and have found the proposed Horse Trials CDD petition to be compliant with each of the review factors. Staff analysis relative to the six factors can be found in Attachment 1. This petition supports the objective of the Community Development strategic focus area to implement prudent and inclusive policy development through effective planning for transportation, land use, and growth management. FISCAL IMPACT: Exhibit “10” of the petition, “Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs for Horse Trials Community Development District” delineates the fiscal impacts and timing of impacts to be managed by the District. It is noteworthy that the estimated internal infrastructure and services to be financed by the CDD is estimated to be $196,784,000 consisting of stormwater management, on-site water and sewer utilities, offsite utilities, a trail system, landscaping, roadways, signage, and street lighting. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The 1,767.35+ acres of the Horse Trials CDD are designated Agricultural Page 5832 of 6355 4/22/2025 Item # 17.B ID# 2025-1035 with the Rural Land Stewardship Area Overlay, as depicted on the Collier County Future Land Use Map. Although the establishment of this District does not constitute any development approval, the plan of development proposed for the subject property (Horse Trials SRA) and its compatibility with the Growth Management Plan (GMP) will be determined at the time of its establishment. Accordingly, any future petitions for rezone or development permits will be subsequently reviewed at the time of submittal and will be subject to the requirements and limitations specified in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and will be required to be consistent with the GMP in effect at that time. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality, and it requires a majority vote for Board approval. (DDP) RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends adoption and enactment of the proposed ordinance establishing the Horse Trials Community Development District. PREPARED BY: Jessica Malloy, Planner II, Growth Management Community Development Department, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section ATTACHMENTS: 1. Petition to Establish Horse Trials CDD 2. Attachment 1 - Proposed Ordinance 3. Attachment 2 - Six Factors: Staff Analysis 4. Advertisements - March 28, 2025; April 4, 2025; April 11, 2025 Page 5833 of 6355 PETITION TO ESTABLISH HORSE TRIALS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Submitted by: Jonathan T. Johnson Florida Bar No. 986460 Jonathan.Johnson@Kutakrock.com KUTAK ROCK LLP 107 West College Avenue Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (850) 692-7300 (telephone) Page 5834 of 6355 1 BEFORE THE COUNTY COMMISSION OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA IN RE: AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE HORSE TRIALS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PETITION TO ESTABLISH Collier Land Holdings, LTD and CDC Investment Properties, LLC (together, “Petitioner”), hereby submit this Petition to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, pursuant to the Uniform Community Development District Act of 1980, Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, to establish a Community Development District with respect to the land described herein. In support of this Petition, Petitioner states as follows: 1.Location and Size. The proposed District is generally located north of County Road 858 (Oil Well Road), west of State Road 29, and east of Ranch One Road in unincorporated Collier County, Florida, and contains approximately 1,767.35 acres. Exhibit 1 depicts the general location of the project. The metes and bounds description of the external boundaries of the District is set forth in Exhibit 2. 2. Excluded Parcels. There is no land within the external boundaries of the proposed District, which is to be excluded from the District. 3. Landowner Consent. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 and made a part hereof is written consent of the owner of 100% of the real property to be included within the District. 4. Name. The proposed name of the District to be established is Horse Trials Community Development District (the “District”). 5.Initial Board Members. The five-persons designated to serve as initial members of the Board of Supervisors of the proposed District are as follows: Mason Rose 999 Vanderbilt Beach Road, Suite 507 Naples, Florida 34108 Jennifer Silguero 975 New Harvest Rd. Immokalee, Florida 34142 Manny Cordova 2639 Professional Circle Naples, Florida 34119 Page 5835 of 6355 2 Margret Emblidge 7400 Trail Blvd., Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34108 Brandon Yarusi 999 Vanderbilt Beach Road, Suite 507 Naples, Florida 34108 All of the above listed persons are residents of the State of Florida and citizens of the United States of America. 6.Existing Land Uses. The existing land uses within and abutting the proposed District are depicted in Exhibit 4. The adjacent property surrounding the proposed District is zoned Agriculture-MHO and designated in the Rural Land Stewardship Area Overlay as Open and Water Retention Area to the north and west, Agriculture-MHO and designated in the Rural Land Stewardship Area Overlay-ACSC/ST, PUD-RLSA02 as Open and Water Retention Area to the east, and Agriculture-MHO and designated in the Rural Land Stewardship Area Overlay as Open, Water Retention Area and Habitat Stewardship Area Collier Rod and Gun Club at the Preserves (SRA) to the south. The lands within the proposed District are zoned Agriculture-MHO and designated in the Rural Land Stewardship Area Overlay as Open and Water Retention Area. 7.Future Land Uses. The future general distribution, location and extent of the public and private land uses proposed within the District are shown on Exhibit 5. The proposed development of the lands within the District contemplates the construction of approximately 2,900 market-rate residential units, 305 affordable residential units, an approximate 50-acre Village Center for non-residential development, estimated at approximately 282,000 square feet, a 30-acre school site, and a 2.5-acre fire station site on an estimated 1,218 acres. These proposed land uses are consistent with the state comprehensive plan and Collier County Comprehensive Plan. Exhibit 6 shows the proposed development plan for the lands within the District. 8.Major Water and Wastewater Facilities. There are no existing major trunk water mains and wastewater interceptors within the currently undeveloped lands to be included within the proposed District. Exhibit 7 shows the proposed major trunk water mains, sewer connections, and reclaimed water mains serving the lands within and around the proposed District. 9.District Facilities and Services. Exhibit 8 describes the type of services and facilities Petitioner presently expects the District to fund, construct and install. The estimated costs Page 5836 of 6355 3 of construction are set forth in Exhibit 9. At present, these improvements are estimated to be made, acquired, constructed and/or installed from 2026 to 2038. These are good faith estimates but are subject to change. Actual construction timetables and expenditures will likely vary, due in part to the effects of future changes in economic conditions upon costs such as labor, services, materials, interest rates and market conditions. 10.Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs. Exhibit 10 is a Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes. 11.Petitioner and Authorized Agent. The Petitioner, Collier Land Holdings, LTD is a Florida limited partnership, and CDC Investment Properties, LLC is a Florida limited liability company, both which are located at 999 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. #507, Naples, Florida 34108. Exhibit 11 identifies the authorized agent for the Petitioner. Copies of all correspondence and official notices should also be sent to the authorized agent for the Petitioner: Jonathan T. Johnson Kutak Rock LLP 107 West College Avenue Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (850) 692-7300 Jonathan.Johnson@Kutakrock.com 12.This petition is to establish the Horse Trials Community Development District should be granted for the following reasons: a. Establishment of the District and all land uses, and services planned within the proposed District are not inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the state comprehensive plan or the effective local government comprehensive plan. b. The area of land within the proposed District is part of a planned community. It is of a sufficient size and is sufficiently compact and contiguous to be developed as one functional and interrelated community. c. The establishment of the District will prevent the general body of taxpayers in the Collier County from bearing the burden for installation of the infrastructure and the maintenance of the above-described facilities within the development encompassed by the District. The District is the best alternative for delivering community development services and facilities to the proposed community without imposing an additional burden on the general population of the local general- Page 5837 of 6355 4 purpose government. Establishment of the District in conjunction with a comprehensively planned community, as proposed, allows for a more efficient use of resources. d. The community development services and facilities of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and use of existing local and regional community development services and facilities. In addition, the establishment of the District will provide a perpetual entity capable of making reasonable provisions for the operation and maintenance of the District services and facilities. e. The area to be served by the proposed District is amenable to separate special- district government. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida to: a.Hold a public hearing to consider the establishment of the Horse Trials Community Development District in accordance with requirements of Section 190.005(2)(b), Florida Statutes; and b. Adopt an ordinance pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, granting this Petition and establishing the Horse Trials Community Development District pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes; and c. Consent to the District’s exercise of certain additional powers to finance, plan, establish, acquire, construct, reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate, manage, and maintain systems and facilities for: (1) parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational uses, (2) security, including but not limited to, guardhouses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion-detection systems, and patrol cars, and (3) control and elimination of mosquitoes and other arthropods of public health importance, as authorized and described in Sections 190.012(2)(a), 190.012(2)(d) and 190.012(2)(e),Florida Statutes; and d. Grant such other relief as may be necessary or appropriate. Page 5838 of 6355 5 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 15th day of January 2025. KUTAK ROCK LLP ______________________________ Jonathan T. Johnson Florida Bar No. 986460 Jonathan.Johnson@kutakrock.com 107 West College Avenue Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (850) 692-7300 (telephone) (850) 692-7319 (facsimile) Attorneys for Petitioner Page 5839 of 6355 EXHIBIT 1EXHIBIT 1EXHIBIT 1EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT 1 Page 5840 of 6355 SCALE DEPICTED FORFULL SIZE 24"x36" PRINTSDOUBLE SCALE FOR11"X17" PRINTS ANDDIGITAL VIEWINGNN,PROJECT LOCATION1Engineering Firm Number: 31200 Surveying Firm License: LB8569 Collier County 7400 Trail Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108 P: 239.597.3111 F: 239.566.2203 EMPLOYEE OWNED CLIENT FOCUSED HORSE TRIALS 3TARPON BLUE & C.E., LLC PROJECT LOCATION MAP CDD EXHIBITS13751 EXHIBIT 1 HORSE TRIALSAVE MARIAPage 5841 of 6355 EXHIBIT 2EXHIBIT 2EXHIBIT 2EXHIBIT 2 EXHIBIT 2 Page 5842 of 6355 WY WY a a SECTION 33 SECTION 34 SECTION 36 SECTION 31 x a © © = = T 47 S T 47S wy wy R29 E R 30 E 4X4 FCM COLLIER 4X4 FCM STAMPED jf MONUMENT 11ST \ —— orn N T 48S T 48S R29 E R SOE 3X3 FCM 5» 3” FIRC STAMPED STAMPED "HW 1677" WW » » LS 2995 ALL FOUND POINTS ON LINE ARE SCALE: 1” = 1000’ 3” FIRC STAMPED "LS 2995 % >) “iy —e5 =~ = me 4X4 FCM/PIN es = b & WASHER \ c Ss 2 \ S oe 2 SECTION 3 STAMPED 1|6 ru \Y\ O ‘e) , \ <= SECTION 4 SECTION 1 3 NS S su No LEGEND S 7 + 2 au ae Pe O = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT AS SHOWN — > SECTION 6 »y2Bs NS mn Dv oFt ® = FOUND DRILL HOLE = ce » Deo DRAINAGE EASEMENT 6 —m Mu 5 S a zz © = FOUND IRON PIPE AS SHOWN WEST LINE < @ (O.R. 2496, PG. 619) a 27% or ae > = FOUND IRON ROD AS SHOWN OW4word | =|. 8 ia ae S WEPBrwS SS < = FOUND PK NAIL AS SHOWN Q |& ~ QS S | B | Via G NW z= 3X3 FCM R/W 4X4 FCM COLLIER ) = FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE AS SHOWN ~ 10 | —s GW / £1 co | Gn a com STAMPED 1677” MONUMENT x] > ! ON 3X3 FCM / STAMPED _ @ = SET IRON ROD & CAP STAMPED m f ! 3S (BROKEN) fH a "ABBINC 3664” JDL 27 7a —@ —H) OSW 3 , r 0 7 7) TT]! 60 DRAINAGE EASEMENT / i|fs N 89°06'14" E |) 4X4 FCM conerS P.O.B. SOUTHWEST CORNER (O.R 2496. PG 619) ~] 5 ‘be C33 1462.67 NOTE: SET 15° 0/S WITNESS MONUMENT OF SECTION 6 AND “™ , ‘ NS wee i]! : /. STAMPED 116 NORTHWEST CORNER OF & Gs 2 | POINTS ON EAST R/W LINE > SECTION 7, T 48 S, R 30 E . SS s iN OF S.R.29 ; N18 WOE 29 DL 23-6 Are FOUND POINTS ON LINE, ARE OSes || N= DRAINAGE EASEMENT SURVEYORS NOTES: IES 5 osw 51 /% J | (OR. 4457, PG. 2019) THIS BOUNDARY SURVEY MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE a JDL 26% 2 at FLORIDA BOARD OF LAND SURVEYORS IN CHAPTER 5J—17, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE " < ° ol | Y CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. 8s au THIS BOUNDARY SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL ce oe No WY SEAL OF THE FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS WEST QUARTER CORNER ) SAT] | m TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTIES WITHOUT THE 4 , © WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED BY CHAPTER SECTION 7 m x4 SECTION 9 | 60.00'—>| + = ILLEGIBLE JDL 2 Co 5 THIS BOUNDARY SURVEY IS CERTIFIED AS TO THE DATE OF FIELD SURVEY, NOT SECTION 12 “osw 7 SY Oo THE SIGNATURE DATE. SJ WEST R.O.W. WEST LINE LINE S.R. 29 SECTION 7 _ Ul 1,767.35 ACRES + JDL 19 CENERAL NOTES: SIs 3X3 FCM STAMPED /— 60’ LCEC EASEMENT aS mW 1677" \ (O.R. 353, PC. 861) 1. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. AO NIS Hy 2. P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING. = ~~ NORTHWEST CORNER Ss 3. R.O.W. = RIGHT-OF-WAY. SECTION 18 AND ww OF SOUTHWEST CORNER Ally eat 4. JDL = JURISDICTION LINE. SECTION 7 m — 4X4 FCM/PIN WSN JDL 22 Fi 5. OSW = OTHER SURFACE WATER. (LOCATION PROVIDED BY PASSARELLA & i Li 3X3 FCM STAMPED RR SPIKE ASSOCIATES, INC.) "HW 1677” — 60.00'—+| +b \ »d rH » » 6. ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD88 DATUM. 9S JDL SAN] -) cq Cl JDL 4 BS Y) 7. BEARINGS AND COORDINATES ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLANE GRID, osw 9-” _e 2 PBN S im EAST ZONE, 83/90 ADJUSTMENT. ~ SO BUNS oT WN _! : 4 =: < of mI | oO THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE SEARCH REPORT PREPARED SECTION 8° ~ Co es =z BY ATTORNEY'S TITLE FUND SERVICES, LLC, FILE NUMBER 1391086, DATED APRIL 25, mane ~ Ps _ SECTION 16 SECTION 15 2023. FROM THE RESTRICTIONS/EASEMENTS SECTION, AS SHOWN ON PAGE 3 AND 4 OF > JDL 5 = N THE ABOVE REFERENCED DOCUMENT, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE SHOWN AND IDENTIFIED WEST QUARTER CORNER 38 NORTH R.O.W. Ss 0 ON THIS SURVEY: 2, 7 AND 8. ITEMS 1, 3, 4, 5, 9 AND 11 ARE NOT PLOTTABLE. ITEM 6 SECTION 18 a LINE C.R. 858 mM JDL ey, o IS A 16 FOOT WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT THAT IS NOT PLOTTABLE AS DESCRIBED. ITEM 10 4X4 FCM BROKEN /DISC bo 14 52 § mie 5 89°38'11" W a RR SPIKE IS A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT GRANTING SITE ACCESS THAT IS NOT PLOTTABLE. COLLIER MONUMENT Cnt 2591.24 GQrvdl 7 STAMPED 13|18 4 ON n \ LINE TABLE we > T Ss a, \. RR SPIKE/WASHER LINE — LENGTH BEARING Vr, SECTION 13 SS >a v Qd RR SPIKE /WASHER LI 578.44 N 89°57'32” E yw W "Ny WEST LINE ossa gv C R. DOT 18|17 L2 534.46 S 13°49'30" W Ge WHA 0,” SECTION 18 = Sw &S : RR SPIKE /WASHER L3 829.62 S 54°28’52” E oO "<1 8, 44% CERTIFIED TO: TARPON BLUE CE MANAGEMENT LLC SiS ws } CURVE TABLE L4 214.09 N 85°56’32” E = Y at Cig’, AN oa Px =< CURVE DELTA RADIUS ARC CHORD CHORD BEARING L5 241.84 N 39°04'43” E = ow Oe A ake a Cl 64'07'49”, 102.00 114.17, 108.30 S_ 13°35'03” E L6 65.77. -N 05'25'32” W = . NIN JDL 16 s) RR SPIKE/WASHER C2 4417'05" 110.00 85.02 82.92 § 681612” E L7 343.75 N 89°58'45” E = No. 5606 : DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: MAY 24, 2005 = vOSW 11 Le DOT PC C3 -58713'09” 108.00 109.74 105.08 N 63°46'41" E L8 276.04 § 17°50’39” E = STATE OF : . \ C4 45°44’47” ~— 111.00 88.63 86.29 N 2310°47” E L9 325.15 N 88°51'21" E 7 la AGNOLI, BARBER & BRUNDAGE, INC. Ss & N= JDL 9 RR SPIKE/WASHER C5 92711745” 95.00 152.87 136.90 § 44°39°33” W L10 986.94 N 02°39'23” E im “ a PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS, SURVEYORS & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS © 4 Osw 12 JDL 11. DOT PT C6 83°14’57” 93.00 135.13 123.55 N 5115°15” W L11 175.26 N 58°09’06” E 2 er \or Xx Ra a C7 611759”, 263.00 = 281.38 = 268.15 S_ 43°45’52" E L12 155.33. N 29°29°41” E &, x ". OR\K ars : JDL 10 ce C8 430512”. 170.00 127.84. 124.85 ~~ N 35°08’47" E L13 141.27 N 02°33'46” E O ot 8 BY 2” FIRC STAMPED ~S 1 ACRE EASEMENT C9 -31°30’26” «100.00 «54.99 54.30 S_ 45°49°39” W L14. 205.22 —-N 1870841” W 114, SURVEN Vs FLA DOT (O.R. 209, PG. 741) C10 52°54°37”. 141.00 = 130.21 125.63. =N 44°07'58" E L15 465.08 N 7778'51” W Treayan GEORGE W. HACKNEY, PSM 5606 DECEMBER 4, 2023 5” CIRC STAMPED Cll -39°54’35” 250.00 = 174.14. 170.64. —N 17°07°40" E L16 145.47. N 21°57'25” W RR SPIKE /WASHER g,, C12 -19°53'01”. 336.00 116.60 = 116.02.—sN:11°56’42” W L17 48.47 N 3713732” E STAMPED DOT 82 HW 1677 C13. 89°58’58” 100.00 157.05 141.40 N 36°45°54” W L18 120.06 ~—N 88°30'51" E RR SPIKE /WASHER C14. 76'24'34” 72.00 96.02 89.06 S$ 52°4210” E L19 173.88 N 25'21°46” E DOT PC C15 651412”, 28.00 31.88 30.19 S 08°05’46" W 120 470.56 N 79°34’44” £ C16 63°3078" 92.00 101.97 96.83 § 59°24’02” W L21 234.08 N 88°39'06” E C17 9770928”, 75.00 = 127.18 = 112.48 ~—-N 57°05'49" E 122. 301.00 ~—-S_80°44’38” E T 48 S T 48 S C18. 67°33'40”. 69.00 ~—- 81.36 = 76.73 ~——«S:53°34'05” W L23 1030.44 § 34°51'40” E C19. 74336” = «724.00 97.63 = 97.56 ~—S 852013” W 124 261.35. S 771632” E R 29 E R SOE C20. 015'34" 15781.00 71.46 ~=71.46 ~—-N 86°05'27” W L25 9.08 S$ 39'21'33” E LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED C21. 721313” 53.00 66.81 62.47 N 59°02’03” W L26 422.16 S 420204” E oo roa 7 S iss _ C22 86°17'18” 73.00 109.94 99.84 S 54°36’25" E£ L27 29.62 S 20°50’21” E revision: or: TARPON BLUE CE MANAGEMENT LLC esign: C23. 53'21'04” 98.00 91.25 87.99 N 68°41'23” W 128 848.34 S 06°51'32” E 8-2-23 ADDED JDL C24 98°08'17” 50.00 85.64 75.55 N 17°56'07” E 129 231.27 S 42°36’35” W LINES. title: drawn: C25 -98°14’52” 71.00 121.75 107.37 S$ _19°48'40” W L30 390.74 S 08°01'46” E 8—15-23 REVISE MAP 5.6 eo eaRY ene. ALL ie ING IN, JAN C26 —-12°45'19”, 810.00 ~—«- 180.32—s« 179.95 N 06°03'03” W L31 326.95 S 08'02’58” E JDL LINES. TOWNSHIP 48. RANGE 30 EAST checked: C27 101°50’44” 78.00 138.65 121.10 S 41°07'18” E 132 493.82 § 0219'23” W 11-6-23 ADD 60’ COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA GWH C28 = 3915112”, 154.00 105.51 103.45 N 61°46'41" E 133 104.89 S 88°47'54” E LCEC EASEMENT & {\ , ) acad #: C29 79°03'20” 93.00 128.32 118.38 S 83°20'56” W L34 1.12 N 00°52'39” W REVISE BOUNDARY. / bk: . ; ~ 13459—BS C30. 31°47'09”, 207.00 114.84. 113.37 S_78715'09" E L35 163.93 N 49'03'53” E 11-28-23 REVISE nn008 “| Pg Odie 30. 2023. “ew C31 1350712”, 125.00 =. 294.79 231.07 = N 00°23°40" E L36 588.70 S 69°18'36" E JDL LINES Ht GNOLI : : LIMITS C32. 20°37'05” ~—- 192.00 69.09 68.72 S 36°54'08” E 137 111.68 N 71°51°47” E 12-423 ADDED TTT scale: ; project #: C33 3515'56”. 167.00 102.79 101.17 § 20°50'44" E 138 344.38 N 50°30’02” wW OSW LINES eee ODER & 1 = 1000 14-0018 C34. 49°00'07”. 3113.00 2662.38 2581.97 S 65°19'07” W L39 91.49. N 30'27'05” Ww : SS COgO ##: —CEM C35 47°58'54” 3300.00 2763.55 2683.50 S 64°49'25” W 140 290.65 N 0215’57” W S ae RO UNDAGE anc w J|sheet # oO ’ ° rs Professional engineers, planners, surveyors & landscape architects - 1 of 6 5. 7400 Trail Blvd., Suite 200, Naples, FL 34108 Ph.: (239)597-3111 Fax: (239)566-2203 file if: Q Certificate of Authorizati Nos. LB 3664, EB 3664 d LC26000620 \S JK JK ertificate oO utnorization os an JAA 3459 J Page 5843 of 6355 Page 2 of 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PART OF SECTIONS 5, 6, 7, 8, 17 AND 18, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 30 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE N 00°00'54" E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6 A DISTANCE OF 1318.98 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE N 89°57'32" E A DISTANCE OF 578.44 FEET; THENCE S 13°49'30" W A DISTANCE OF 534.46 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 71°31'09" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 102.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 64°07'49" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 114.17 FEET; THENCE S 54°28'52" E A DISTANCE OF 829.62 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 43°52'20" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 110.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°17'05" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 85.02 FEET; THENCE N 85°56'32" E A DISTANCE OF 214.09 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 02°53'15" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 108.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58°13'09" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 109.74 FEET; THENCE N 39°04'43" E A DISTANCE OF 241.84 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 43°56'49" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 111.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45°44'47" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 88.63 FEET; THENCE N 05°25'32" W A DISTANCE OF 65.77 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 88°33'40" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 95.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 92°11'45" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 152.87 FEET; THENCE N 89°58'45" E A DISTANCE OF 343.75 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 02°52'44" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 93.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 83°14'57" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 135.13 FEET; Page 5844 of 6355 Page 3 of 6 THENCE S 17°50'39" E A DISTANCE OF 276.04 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 76°53'08" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 263.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 61°17'59" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 281.38 FEET; THENCE N 88°51'21" E A DISTANCE OF 325.15 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 33°18'37" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 170.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43°05'12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 127.84 FEET; THENCE N 02°39'23" E A DISTANCE OF 986.94 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 59°55'34" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°30'26" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 54.99 FEET; THENCE N 58°09'06" E A DISTANCE OF 175.26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 19°24'44" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 141.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°54'37" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 130.21 FEET; THENCE N 29°29'41" E A DISTANCE OF 155.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 52°55'02" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39°54'35" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 174.14 FEET; THENCE N 02°33'46" E A DISTANCE OF 141.27 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 87°59'49" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 336.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19°53'01" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 116.60 FEET; THENCE N 18°08'41" W A DISTANCE OF 205.22 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 81°46'25" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°58'58" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 157.05 FEET; THENCE N 77°18'51" W A DISTANCE OF 465.08 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 00°54'27" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 72.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 76°24'34" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 96.02 FEET; THENCE N 21°57'25" W A DISTANCE OF 145.47 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 65°28'40" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 28.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 65°14'12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.88 FEET; THENCE N 37°13'32" E A DISTANCE OF 48.47 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 62°21'07" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 92.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 63°30'18" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 101.97 FEET; Page 5845 of 6355 Page 4 of 6 THENCE N 88°30'51" E A DISTANCE OF 120.06 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 15°40'33" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 75.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 97°09'28" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 127.18 FEET; THENCE N 25°21'46" E A DISTANCE OF 173.88 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 70°12'45" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 69.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 67°33'40" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 81.36 FEET; THENCE N 79°34'44" E A DISTANCE OF 470.56 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 08°31'35" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 724.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07°43'36" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 97.63 FEET; THENCE N 88°39'06" E A DISTANCE OF 234.08 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 03°46'46" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 15781.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°15'34" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 71.46 FEET; THENCE S 80°44'38" E A DISTANCE OF 301.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 05°08'40" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 53.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 72°13'13" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 66.81 FEET; THENCE S 34°51'40" E A DISTANCE OF 1030.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 78°32'14" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 73.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86°17'18" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 109.94 FEET; THENCE S 77°16'32" E A DISTANCE OF 261.35 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 05°21'55" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 98.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°21'04" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 91.25 FEET; THENCE S 39°21'33" E A DISTANCE OF 9.08 FEET; THENCE S 42°02'04" E A DISTANCE OF 422.16 FEET; THENCE S 20°50'21" E A DISTANCE OF 29.62 FEET; THENCE S 06°51'32" E A DISTANCE OF 848.34 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 58°51'58" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 98°08'17" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 85.64 FEET; THENCE S 42°36'35" W A DISTANCE OF 231.27 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 21°03'54" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 71.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 98°14'52" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 121.75 FEET; THENCE S 08°01'46" E A DISTANCE OF 390.74 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 8 AND THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; Page 5846 of 6355 Page 5 of 6 THENCE S 08°02'58" E A DISTANCE OF 326.95 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 77°34'17" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 810.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°45'19" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 180.32 FEET; THENCE S 02°19'23" W A DISTANCE OF 493.82 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 80°11'56" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 78.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 101°50'44" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 138.65 FEET; THENCE S 88°47'54" E A DISTANCE OF 104.89 FEET; THENCE N 00°52'39" W A DISTANCE OF 1.12 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 08°35'43" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 154.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39°15'12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 105.51 FEET; THENCE N 49°03'53" E A DISTANCE OF 163.93 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 46°10'44" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 93.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 79°03'20" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 128.32 FEET; THENCE S 69°18'36" E A DISTANCE OF 588.70 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 27°38'25" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 207.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°47'09" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 114.84 FEET; THENCE N 71°51'47" E A DISTANCE OF 111.68 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 22°02'44" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 125.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 135°07'12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 294.79 FEET; THENCE N 50°30'02" W A DISTANCE OF 344.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 42°47'19" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 192.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20°37'05" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 69.09 FEET; THENCE N 30°27'05" W A DISTANCE OF 91.49 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 51°31'18" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 167.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35°15'56" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 102.79 FEET; THENCE N 02°15'57" W A DISTANCE OF 290.65 FEET; THENCE N 89°06'14" E A DISTANCE OF 1462.67 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 60.00 FEET WESTERLY FROM AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF S.R. 29 (R.O.W. VARIES); THENCE S 00°48'12" E ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 4035.32 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE S 00°46'54" E A DISTANCE OF 1108.33 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF AFORESAID SECTION 8; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE S 00°46'54" E A DISTANCE OF 2617.97 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF C.R. 858 (100’ R.O.W.); Page 5847 of 6355 Page 6 of 6 THENCE LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE S 89°38'11" W ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 2591.24 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 00°10'49" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3113.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49°00'07" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 2662.38 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE S 40°52'00" W A DISTANCE OF 707.94 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 49°10'02" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3300.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47°58'54" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 2763.55 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE S 88°47'45" W A DISTANCE OF 109.34 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE N 00°33'27" W ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 2605.37 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE N 00°32'46" W A DISTANCE OF 2667.94 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE N 00°41'05" W ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 2646.47 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE N 00°41'15" W A DISTANCE OF 2646.58 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED. CONTAINING A TOTAL AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 1,767.35 ACRES. REFERENCE ABB DRAWING #13459-BS Page 5848 of 6355 EXHIBIT 3EXHIBIT 3EXHIBIT 3EXHIBIT 3 EXHIBIT 3 Page 5849 of 6355 CONSENT AND JOINDER TO ESTABLISHMENT OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT The undersigned is the owner of certain lands more fully described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (“Property”). The undersigned understands and acknowledges that Petitioner intends to submit a petition to establish a community development district in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 190 of the Florida Statutes. As the owner of lands which are intended to constitute all or a portion of the community development district, the undersigned understands and acknowledges that pursuant to the provisions of Section 190.005, Florida Statutes, the Petitioner is required to include the written consent to the establishment of the community development district of one hundred percent (100%) of the owners of the lands to be included within the community development district. The undersigned hereby consents to the establishment of the community development district which will include the Property within the lands to be a part of the community development district and agrees to further execute any documentation necessary or convenient to evidence this consent and joinder during the application process for the establishment of the community development district. The undersigned acknowledges that the consent will remain in full force and effect until the community development district is established or a written revocation is issued, which ever shall first occur. The undersigned further agrees that it will provide to the next purchaser or successor in interest of all or any portion of the Property a copy of this consent form and obtain, if requested by Petitioner, a consent to establishment of the community development district in substantially this form. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that it has taken all actions and obtained all consents necessary to duly authorize the execution of this consent and joinder by the person executing this instrument. [signatures on following page] Page 5850 of 6355 Executed this DA day of COKUMILY , 2024. WITNESSES: CDC Investment Properties, LLC., a Florida limited liability company, formerly known as CDC Land Investments, Inc., as provided in the Articles of Conversion filed on J ha Carre September 13, 2022 with the Florida Name: Livoa m. CAWNARSA Secretary of State, by Tarpon Blue CE Address: 999 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Management, LLC, a Delaware limited Naples, FL 34108 liability company its Manager Name: WZ Name: Patrick L. Utter Address: 999 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Title: Vice President Naples, FL 34108 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of & physical presence or O online —notarization this QA day of ue 2024, by PAT L. Ue sas ICR Pyeaident of DL MveAmont Rvopattes LLCwho is O personally known to me_ or O produced as identification. Se, LAUREN TAYLOR CLARKE MORALES Signature & Seal) 4 Commission # HH 261093 Sree Expires May 4, 2026 Print Name: LAO TAM (Ade ovales Notary Public, State of F lorida wey set. Rota “ Exhibit A: Property DescriptionPage 5851 of 6355 Page 2 of 6 Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PART OF SECTIONS 5, 6, 7, 8, 17 AND 18, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 30 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE N 00°00'54" E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6 A DISTANCE OF 1318.98 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE N 89°57'32" E A DISTANCE OF 578.44 FEET; THENCE S 13°49'30" W A DISTANCE OF 534.46 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 71°31'09" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 102.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 64°07'49" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 114.17 FEET; THENCE S 54°28'52" E A DISTANCE OF 829.62 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 43°52'20" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 110.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°17'05" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 85.02 FEET; THENCE N 85°56'32" E A DISTANCE OF 214.09 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 02°53'15" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 108.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58°13'09" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 109.74 FEET; THENCE N 39°04'43" E A DISTANCE OF 241.84 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 43°56'49" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 111.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45°44'47" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 88.63 FEET; THENCE N 05°25'32" W A DISTANCE OF 65.77 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 88°33'40" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 95.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 92°11'45" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 152.87 FEET; THENCE N 89°58'45" E A DISTANCE OF 343.75 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 02°52'44" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 93.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 83°14'57" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 135.13 FEET; THENCE S 17°50'39" E A DISTANCE OF 276.04 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 76°53'08" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 263.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 61°17'59" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 281.38 FEET; Page 5852 of 6355 Page 3 of 6 THENCE N 88°51'21" E A DISTANCE OF 325.15 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 33°18'37" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 170.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43°05'12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 127.84 FEET; THENCE N 02°39'23" E A DISTANCE OF 986.94 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 59°55'34" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°30'26" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 54.99 FEET; THENCE N 58°09'06" E A DISTANCE OF 175.26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 19°24'44" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 141.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°54'37" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 130.21 FEET; THENCE N 29°29'41" E A DISTANCE OF 155.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 52°55'02" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39°54'35" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 174.14 FEET; THENCE N 02°33'46" E A DISTANCE OF 141.27 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 87°59'49" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 336.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19°53'01" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 116.60 FEET; THENCE N 18°08'41" W A DISTANCE OF 205.22 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 81°46'25" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°58'58" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 157.05 FEET; THENCE N 77°18'51" W A DISTANCE OF 465.08 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 00°54'27" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 72.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 76°24'34" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 96.02 FEET; THENCE N 21°57'25" W A DISTANCE OF 145.47 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 65°28'40" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 28.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 65°14'12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.88 FEET; THENCE N 37°13'32" E A DISTANCE OF 48.47 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 62°21'07" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 92.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 63°30'18" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 101.97 FEET; THENCE N 88°30'51" E A DISTANCE OF 120.06 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 15°40'33" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 75.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 97°09'28" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 127.18 FEET; Page 5853 of 6355 Page 4 of 6 THENCE N 25°21'46" E A DISTANCE OF 173.88 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 70°12'45" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 69.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 67°33'40" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 81.36 FEET; THENCE N 79°34'44" E A DISTANCE OF 470.56 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 08°31'35" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 724.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07°43'36" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 97.63 FEET; THENCE N 88°39'06" E A DISTANCE OF 234.08 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 03°46'46" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 15781.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°15'34" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 71.46 FEET; THENCE S 80°44'38" E A DISTANCE OF 301.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 05°08'40" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 53.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 72°13'13" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 66.81 FEET; THENCE S 34°51'40" E A DISTANCE OF 1030.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 78°32'14" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 73.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86°17'18" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 109.94 FEET; THENCE S 77°16'32" E A DISTANCE OF 261.35 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 05°21'55" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 98.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°21'04" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 91.25 FEET; THENCE S 39°21'33" E A DISTANCE OF 9.08 FEET; THENCE S 42°02'04" E A DISTANCE OF 422.16 FEET; THENCE S 20°50'21" E A DISTANCE OF 29.62 FEET; THENCE S 06°51'32" E A DISTANCE OF 848.34 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 58°51'58" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 98°08'17" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 85.64 FEET; THENCE S 42°36'35" W A DISTANCE OF 231.27 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 21°03'54" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 71.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 98°14'52" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 121.75 FEET; THENCE S 08°01'46" E A DISTANCE OF 390.74 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 8 AND THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE S 08°02'58" E A DISTANCE OF 326.95 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 77°34'17" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 810.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°45'19" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 180.32 FEET; Page 5854 of 6355 Page 5 of 6 THENCE S 02°19'23" W A DISTANCE OF 493.82 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 80°11'56" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 78.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 101°50'44" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 138.65 FEET; THENCE S 88°47'54" E A DISTANCE OF 104.89 FEET; THENCE N 00°52'39" W A DISTANCE OF 1.12 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 08°35'43" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 154.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39°15'12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 105.51 FEET; THENCE N 49°03'53" E A DISTANCE OF 163.93 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 46°10'44" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 93.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 79°03'20" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 128.32 FEET; THENCE S 69°18'36" E A DISTANCE OF 588.70 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 27°38'25" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 207.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°47'09" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 114.84 FEET; THENCE N 71°51'47" E A DISTANCE OF 111.68 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 22°02'44" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 125.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 135°07'12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 294.79 FEET; THENCE N 50°30'02" W A DISTANCE OF 344.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 42°47'19" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 192.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20°37'05" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 69.09 FEET; THENCE N 30°27'05" W A DISTANCE OF 91.49 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 51°31'18" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 167.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35°15'56" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 102.79 FEET; THENCE N 02°15'57" W A DISTANCE OF 290.65 FEET; THENCE N 89°06'14" E A DISTANCE OF 1462.67 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 60.00 FEET WESTERLY FROM AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF S.R. 29 (R.O.W. VARIES); THENCE S 00°48'12" E ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 4035.32 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE S 00°46'54" E A DISTANCE OF 1108.33 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF AFORESAID SECTION 8; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE S 00°46'54" E A DISTANCE OF 2617.97 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF C.R. 858 (100’ R.O.W.); THENCE LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE S 89°38'11" W ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 2591.24 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 00°10'49" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3113.00 FEET; Page 5855 of 6355 Page 6 of 6 THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49°00'07" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 2662.38 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE S 40°52'00" W A DISTANCE OF 707.94 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 49°10'02" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3300.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47°58'54" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 2763.55 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE S 88°47'45" W A DISTANCE OF 109.34 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE N 00°33'27" W ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 2605.37 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE N 00°32'46" W A DISTANCE OF 2667.94 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE N 00°41'05" W ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 2646.47 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE N 00°41'15" W A DISTANCE OF 2646.58 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED. CONTAINING A TOTAL AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 1,767.35 ACRES. REFERENCE ABB DRAWING #13459-BS Page 5856 of 6355 CONSENT AND JOINDER TO ESTABLISHMENT OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT The undersigned is the owner of certain lands more fully described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (“Property”). The undersigned understands and acknowledges that Petitioner intends to submit a petition to establish a community development district in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 190 of the Florida Statutes. As the owner of lands which are intended to constitute all or a portion of the community development district, the undersigned understands and acknowledges that pursuant to the provisions of Section 190.005, Florida Statutes, the Petitioner is required to include the written consent to the establishment of the community development district of one hundred percent (100%) of the owners of the lands to be included within the community development district. The undersigned hereby consents to the establishment of the community development district which will include the Property within the lands to be a part of the community development district and agrees to further execute any documentation necessary or convenient to evidence this consent and joinder during the application process for the establishment of the community development district. The undersigned acknowledges that the consent will remain in full force and effect until the community development district is established or a written revocation is issued, which ever shall first occur. The undersigned further agrees that it will provide to the next purchaser or successor in interest of all or any portion of the Property a copy of this consent form and obtain, if requested by Petitioner, a consent to establishment of the community development district in substantially this form. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that it has taken all actions and obtained all consents necessary to duly authorize the execution of this consent and joinder by the person executing this instrument. [signatures on following page| Page 5857 of 6355 Executed this QA day of _eprenpe_, 2024. WITNESSES: Collier Land Holdings, LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership by Tarpon Blue CE Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company its Sole General Partner Lorrdity Cpe Name: Lin®2A M CANNALSA Address: 999 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Naples, FL 34108 Name: Patrick L. Utter ft: Title: Vice President gee oy Chavke ovale Address: 999 Vandérbilt Beach Rd. Naples, FL 34108 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of (physical presence or O online notarization this Q4 = day of DPWMyer _,— «2024, by Patick L. Yate vas Ie Weide of | \ TD who is © personally known to me_ or © praduced as identification. buon Yule) Se . LAUREN TAYLOR CLARKE MORALES (Official Notary Signature & Seal) * =<: Commission # HH 261093 eS: 4, 2026 ; = DEE aS Expires May Print Name: | AWM (aunlov Clave MoyaleS ~ Notary Public, State of Florida Exhibit A: Property DescriptionPage 5858 of 6355 Page 2 of 6 Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PART OF SECTIONS 5, 6, 7, 8, 17 AND 18, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 30 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE N 00°00'54" E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6 A DISTANCE OF 1318.98 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE N 89°57'32" E A DISTANCE OF 578.44 FEET; THENCE S 13°49'30" W A DISTANCE OF 534.46 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 71°31'09" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 102.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 64°07'49" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 114.17 FEET; THENCE S 54°28'52" E A DISTANCE OF 829.62 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 43°52'20" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 110.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°17'05" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 85.02 FEET; THENCE N 85°56'32" E A DISTANCE OF 214.09 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 02°53'15" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 108.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58°13'09" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 109.74 FEET; THENCE N 39°04'43" E A DISTANCE OF 241.84 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 43°56'49" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 111.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45°44'47" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 88.63 FEET; THENCE N 05°25'32" W A DISTANCE OF 65.77 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 88°33'40" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 95.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 92°11'45" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 152.87 FEET; THENCE N 89°58'45" E A DISTANCE OF 343.75 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 02°52'44" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 93.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 83°14'57" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 135.13 FEET; THENCE S 17°50'39" E A DISTANCE OF 276.04 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 76°53'08" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 263.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 61°17'59" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 281.38 FEET; Page 5859 of 6355 Page 3 of 6 THENCE N 88°51'21" E A DISTANCE OF 325.15 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 33°18'37" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 170.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43°05'12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 127.84 FEET; THENCE N 02°39'23" E A DISTANCE OF 986.94 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 59°55'34" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°30'26" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 54.99 FEET; THENCE N 58°09'06" E A DISTANCE OF 175.26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 19°24'44" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 141.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°54'37" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 130.21 FEET; THENCE N 29°29'41" E A DISTANCE OF 155.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 52°55'02" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39°54'35" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 174.14 FEET; THENCE N 02°33'46" E A DISTANCE OF 141.27 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 87°59'49" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 336.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19°53'01" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 116.60 FEET; THENCE N 18°08'41" W A DISTANCE OF 205.22 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 81°46'25" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°58'58" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 157.05 FEET; THENCE N 77°18'51" W A DISTANCE OF 465.08 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 00°54'27" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 72.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 76°24'34" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 96.02 FEET; THENCE N 21°57'25" W A DISTANCE OF 145.47 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 65°28'40" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 28.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 65°14'12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.88 FEET; THENCE N 37°13'32" E A DISTANCE OF 48.47 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 62°21'07" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 92.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 63°30'18" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 101.97 FEET; THENCE N 88°30'51" E A DISTANCE OF 120.06 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 15°40'33" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 75.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 97°09'28" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 127.18 FEET; Page 5860 of 6355 Page 4 of 6 THENCE N 25°21'46" E A DISTANCE OF 173.88 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 70°12'45" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 69.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 67°33'40" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 81.36 FEET; THENCE N 79°34'44" E A DISTANCE OF 470.56 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 08°31'35" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 724.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07°43'36" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 97.63 FEET; THENCE N 88°39'06" E A DISTANCE OF 234.08 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 03°46'46" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 15781.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°15'34" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 71.46 FEET; THENCE S 80°44'38" E A DISTANCE OF 301.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 05°08'40" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 53.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 72°13'13" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 66.81 FEET; THENCE S 34°51'40" E A DISTANCE OF 1030.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 78°32'14" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 73.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86°17'18" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 109.94 FEET; THENCE S 77°16'32" E A DISTANCE OF 261.35 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 05°21'55" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 98.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°21'04" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 91.25 FEET; THENCE S 39°21'33" E A DISTANCE OF 9.08 FEET; THENCE S 42°02'04" E A DISTANCE OF 422.16 FEET; THENCE S 20°50'21" E A DISTANCE OF 29.62 FEET; THENCE S 06°51'32" E A DISTANCE OF 848.34 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 58°51'58" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 98°08'17" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 85.64 FEET; THENCE S 42°36'35" W A DISTANCE OF 231.27 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 21°03'54" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 71.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 98°14'52" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 121.75 FEET; THENCE S 08°01'46" E A DISTANCE OF 390.74 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 8 AND THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE S 08°02'58" E A DISTANCE OF 326.95 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 77°34'17" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 810.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°45'19" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 180.32 FEET; Page 5861 of 6355 Page 5 of 6 THENCE S 02°19'23" W A DISTANCE OF 493.82 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 80°11'56" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 78.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 101°50'44" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 138.65 FEET; THENCE S 88°47'54" E A DISTANCE OF 104.89 FEET; THENCE N 00°52'39" W A DISTANCE OF 1.12 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 08°35'43" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 154.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39°15'12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 105.51 FEET; THENCE N 49°03'53" E A DISTANCE OF 163.93 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 46°10'44" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 93.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 79°03'20" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 128.32 FEET; THENCE S 69°18'36" E A DISTANCE OF 588.70 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 27°38'25" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 207.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°47'09" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 114.84 FEET; THENCE N 71°51'47" E A DISTANCE OF 111.68 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 22°02'44" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 125.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 135°07'12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 294.79 FEET; THENCE N 50°30'02" W A DISTANCE OF 344.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 42°47'19" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 192.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20°37'05" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 69.09 FEET; THENCE N 30°27'05" W A DISTANCE OF 91.49 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 51°31'18" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 167.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35°15'56" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 102.79 FEET; THENCE N 02°15'57" W A DISTANCE OF 290.65 FEET; THENCE N 89°06'14" E A DISTANCE OF 1462.67 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 60.00 FEET WESTERLY FROM AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF S.R. 29 (R.O.W. VARIES); THENCE S 00°48'12" E ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 4035.32 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE S 00°46'54" E A DISTANCE OF 1108.33 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF AFORESAID SECTION 8; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE S 00°46'54" E A DISTANCE OF 2617.97 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF C.R. 858 (100’ R.O.W.); THENCE LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE S 89°38'11" W ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 2591.24 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 00°10'49" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3113.00 FEET; Page 5862 of 6355 Page 6 of 6 THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49°00'07" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 2662.38 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE S 40°52'00" W A DISTANCE OF 707.94 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N 49°10'02" W AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3300.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47°58'54" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 2763.55 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE S 88°47'45" W A DISTANCE OF 109.34 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE N 00°33'27" W ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 2605.37 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE N 00°32'46" W A DISTANCE OF 2667.94 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE N 00°41'05" W ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 2646.47 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE N 00°41'15" W A DISTANCE OF 2646.58 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED. CONTAINING A TOTAL AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 1,767.35 ACRES. REFERENCE ABB DRAWING #13459-BS Page 5863 of 6355 EXHIBIT 4EXHIBIT 4EXHIBIT 4EXHIBIT 4 EXHIBIT 4 Page 5864 of 6355 S.R. 29C.R. 858 (OIL WELL RD.) ZONING A-MHO-RLSAO ZONING A-MHO-RLSAO ZONING A-MHO-RLSAO-ACSC/ST ZONING A-MHO-RLSAO COLLIER ROD AND GUN CLUB AT THE PRESERVE (SRA) ZONING PUD-RLSAO2 ZONING A-MHO-RLSAO 4 Engineering Firm Number: 31200 Surveying Firm License: LB8569 Collier County 7400 Trail Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108 P: 239.597.3111 F: 239.566.2203 EMPLOYEE OWNED CLIENT FOCUSED HORSE TRIALS EXHIBIT 4 3 TARPON BLUE & C.E., LLC EXISTING ZONING CDD EXHIBITS 13751 SCALE DEPICTED FOR FULL SIZE 24"x36" PRINTS DOUBLE SCALE FOR 11"X17" PRINTS AND DIGITAL VIEWING NN ,CDD BOUNDARY 60' LCEC EASEMENT PANTHER COORIDORPage 5865 of 6355 EXHIBIT 9EXHIBIT 9EXHIBIT 9EXHIBIT 9 EXHIBIT 5 Page 5866 of 6355 Zoning Open Zoning: WRA Zoning Open Zoning WRA Zoning ACSC Zoning ACSC Zoning Open Exhibit 4 B - Existing Land Uses per Collier County Future Land Use Map Collier County Rural & Agricultural Area Assessment Stewardship Overlay Map Zoning: WRA Page 5867 of 6355 EXHIBIT 6EXHIBIT 6EXHIBIT 6EXHIBIT 6 EXHIBIT 6 Page 5868 of 6355 SCHOOL SITE 30.05 Ac. FIRE 2.70 Ac. AMENITY CENTER MULYI-FAMILY PARK AF-1 VILLAGE CENTER AF-2 PARK PARK PARK PARK PARKPARK UTILITY SITE 8.62 Ac. PARK S.R. 29C.R. 858 (OIL WELL RD.) 2 Engineering Firm Number: 31200 Surveying Firm License: LB8569 Collier County 7400 Trail Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108 P: 239.597.3111 F: 239.566.2203 EMPLOYEE OWNED CLIENT FOCUSED HORSE TRIALS EXHIBIT 2 3 TARPON BLUE & C.E., LLC CDD MASTER PLAN CDD EXHIBITS 13751 SCALE DEPICTED FOR FULL SIZE 24"x36" PRINTS DOUBLE SCALE FOR 11"X17" PRINTS AND DIGITAL VIEWING NN ,CDD BOUNDARY 60' LCEC EASEMENT PANTHER COORIDORPage 5869 of 6355 EXHIBIT /EXHIBIT /EXHIBIT /EXHIBIT / EXHIBIT 7 Page 5870 of 6355 S.R. 29C.R. 858 (OIL WELL RD.)AVE MARIA BOULEVARDC.R. 858 (OIL WELL RD.)CAMP KEAIS ROAD AVEMARIAHORSETRIALSSCALE DEPICTED FORFULL SIZE 24"x36" PRINTSDOUBLE SCALE FOR11"X17" PRINTS ANDDIGITAL VIEWINGNN, PANTHER COORIDOR 5Engineering Firm Number: 31200 Surveying Firm License: LB8569 Collier County 7400 Trail Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108 P: 239.597.3111 F: 239.566.2203 EMPLOYEE OWNED CLIENT FOCUSED HORSE TRIALS 3TARPON BLUE & C.E., LLC FUTURE UTILITY SERVICE ROUTE CDD EXHIBITS13751 EXHIBIT 5UTILITY SITEUTILITY MAINS ROUTEPage 5871 of 6355 EXHIBIT 8EXHIBIT 8EXHIBIT 8EXHIBIT 8 EXHIBIT 8 Page 5872 of 6355 Horse Trials Community Development District Proposed Facilities and Services Infrastructure Category Funded By Maintained By Ownership Onsite Roads CDD CDD CDD Stormwater Management Facilities & Drainage CDD CDD CDD On Site Water, IQ & Sewer Utilities CDD CDD CDD Trail System, Landscape, Streetscape, Signage, Electric & Street Lighting CDD CDD CDD Offsite Traffic Signal CDD County/State County/State Offsite Utilities CDD CDD CDD Page 5873 of 6355 EXHIBIT 9EXHIBIT 9EXHIBIT 9EXHIBIT 9 EXHIBIT 9 Page 5874 of 6355 Horse Trials Community Development District Capital Improvements Cost Estimates Category Estimated Budget $ Onsite Roads Paving & Grading $34,518,520 Stormwater Management Facilities & Drainage Drainage $15,003,390 Lake Excavation $15,542,100 On Site Water, IQ & Sewer Utilities Potable Water & Fire $14,766,500 Wastewater $22,359,000 IQ System $13,303,000 Trail System, Landscape, Streetscape, Signage, Electric & Street Lighting Electric & Street Lights $8,923,240 Landscaping & Irrigation $4,000,000 Traffic Signal $2,000,000 Offsite Utilities $14,699,875 Miscellaneous $1,285,226 Contingency $16,267,368 TOTAL $97,604,209 TOTAL (rounded)$175,700,000 TOTAL (rounded)$175,700,000 Regulatory Review & Inspection Fees $5,271,000 Mobilization $3,514,000 Design Fee $12,299,000 TOTAL $196,784,000 Page 5875 of 6355 EXHIBIT 10EXHIBIT 10EXHIBIT 10EXHIBIT 10 EXHIBIT 10 Page 5876 of 6355 STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS ACCOMPANYING THE PETITION TO ESTABLISH THE HORSE TRIALS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT January 2025 Prepared for: Members of the County Commission, Collier County, Florida Prepared on January 14, 2025 PFM Group Consulting LLC 3501 Quadrangle Boulevard, Ste 270 Orlando, FL 32817 Page 5877 of 6355 _______________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS Horse Trials Community Development District January 14, 2025 ______________________________________________________________ 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose This statement of estimated regulatory costs (“SERC”) serves as an exhibit to the petition (“Petition”) to establish the proposed Horse Trials Community Development District (“District”). The District, upon establishment, will include approximately 1,770+/- acres of land on which Collier Land Holdings, Ltd and its associated development affiliates (“Petitioner”) plans to develop its mixed-use development (“Project”). The District is planned to include the preliminary mix of uses within the Project including the following: 2,900 residential units and 50+/- acre Village Center for non-residential development (estimated at approximately 500,000 square feet of non-residential development). This development will be located on an estimated 1,218+/- acres within the District. The lands within the District are located within the boundaries of Collier County, Florida (“County”). The District proposes to provide community services to the land uses planned for the District, as described in more detail below. 1.2 Scope of the Analysis The limitations on the scope of this SERC are explicitly set out in Section 190.002(2)(d), Florida Statutes (governing Community Development District formation or alteration) as follows: "That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general law be fair and based only on factors material to managing and financing the service delivery function of the district, so that any matter concerning permitting or planning of the development is not material or relevant” (emphasis added). Page 5878 of 6355 1.3 Requirements for Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs Section 120.541(2), F.S. defines the elements that a statement of estimated regulatory costs must contain: a)An economic analysis showing whether the rule directly or indirectly: 1.Is likely to have an adverse impact on economic growth, private sector job creation or employment, or private sector investment in excess of $1 million in the aggregate within 5 years after the implementation of the rule; 2.Is likely to have an adverse impact on business competitiveness, including the ability of persons doing business in the state to compete with persons doing business in other states or domestic markets, productivity, or innovation in excess of $1 million in the aggregate within 5 years after the implantation of the rule; or 3.Is likely to increase regulatory costs, including any transactional costs, in excess of $1 million in the aggregate within 5 years after the implementation of the rule. b)A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the rule, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the rule. c)A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues. d)A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities, including local governmental entities, required to comply with the requirements of the rule. As used in this paragraph, “transactional costs” are direct costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard business practices, and include filing fees, the cost of obtaining a license, the cost of equipment required to be installed or used or procedures required to be employed in complying with the rule, additional operating costs incurred, and the cost of monitoring and reporting. e)An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. f)Any additional information that the agency determines may be useful. g)In the statement or revised statement, whichever applies, a description of any good faith written proposal submitted under paragraph (1) (a) and either a statement adopting the alternative or a statement of the reasons for rejecting the alternative in favor of the proposed rule. Page 5879 of 6355 2.0 An economic analysis showing whether the establishment of the proposed District directly or indirectly will have an adverse impact on economic growth, private job creation or employment, private sector investment, business competitiveness or regulatory costs As outlined above, the proposed District will not have an adverse impact on economic growth, private job creation or employment, private sector investment, business competitiveness or regulatory costs. Rather, the District’s establishment is likely to increase the overall economic development described herein. This is because the District will provide infrastructure improvements within and surrounding the District’s boundaries, allowing for the development of the land within the District. This development is planned to include a diverse mix of uses which will require goods and services. This new demand created by the District’s development will increase economic growth, private job creation and employment, private sector investment and business competitiveness in the areas surrounding the District The District will have the ability to assess its property owners to pay for the installation, operation and maintenance of its infrastructure improvements. However, such costs will not be in addition to, or unique to the District. The infrastructure improvements to be funded by the District would be required to support development of the mixed-use project regardless of the District’s existence. Community development districts such as the proposed District can fund their infrastructure improvements with long-term bond financing that typically carries more favorable terms than other sources of funding. Thus, the costs related to the installation of the public infrastructure serving the planned new development will not be increased due to the existence of the District. 3.0 A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the ordinance, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the ordinance As outlined above, the proposed District is planned to include various types of commercial development with the potential for multiple property owners at build-out. It is the property owners within the District that will be served by, and therefore most affected by the District. All initial property owners within the District have consented to the formation of the District and those who choose to purchase property within the District will be aware of the District and will purchase property within the District on a voluntary basis. The District will provide community services to the properties within its boundaries, as outlined in Table 1. Page 5880 of 6355 Table 1. Proposed Facilities and Services* Infrastructure Category Funded By Maintained By Ownership Onsite Roads CDD CDD CDD Stormwater Management Facilities & Drainage CDD CDD CDD On Site Water, IQ & Sewer Utilities CDD CDD CDD Trail System, Landscape, Streetscape, Signage, Electric & Street Lighting CDD CDD CDD Offsite Traffic Signal CDD County/State County/State Offsite Utilities CDD CDD CDD Source: Developer *Preliminary (subject to change based on further discussion with local municipality) All of the property owners within the District will be subject to District rules related to the services provided by, and the facilities owned or operated by, the District. District property owners will also be responsible for paying District assessments to install the public infrastructure improvements listed above and to fund the District’s operations and maintenance expenses incurred thereafter on an ongoing basis. Of course, all of the undeveloped land owned by the petitioner and any other landowner within the District will also be under the jurisdiction of the District and subject to funding their share of the District’s operations and maintenance expenses. Consistent with the District’s ability to assess landowners for operation and maintenance activities, this applies to operation and maintenance of any and all portions of the stormwater management system under District control and responsibility referenced in the South Florida Water Management District’s Letter to the Petitioner dated November 6, 2024 regarding Application No. 240202-42238 specifically the language referenced below: Page 5881 of 6355 4.0 Good faith estimate of the cost to state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues 4.1 Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Ordinance State Governmental Entities The cost to State entities to review or enforce the proposed ordinance will be very modest. The District comprises less than 2,500 acres and is located within the boundaries of the County. Therefore, the County (and not the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission) will review and act upon the Petition to establish the District. There are minimal additional ongoing costs to various State entities to implement and enforce the proposed ordinance. The District is a special purpose unit of local government, and is required to file various reports with the State of Florida, the Department of Economic Opportunity and other agencies of the State. The District’s filing requirements are outlined in the attached Appendix. However, the additional costs to the State and its various departments to process the additional filings from the District are very low, since the State routinely processes filings from many other similar districts. Additionally, the District will pay an annual special district fee to the Department of Economic Opportunity which largely offsets any such costs. Collier County, Florida The Petition to establish the District will require the County to review the Petition and its supporting exhibits. In addition, the County will hold a public hearing to discuss the Petition and consider any public input on the establishment of the District. These activities will require the time of County staff members and of the County Commission. However, these costs will be modest at most for the following reasons. First, the review of the Petition to establish the District does not include an analysis of the project itself. In fact, such a review of the project is prohibited by statute. Second, the Petition contains all of the information necessary for the County’s review. Third, no capital costs are involved in the review. Fourth, there are significant economies of scale as it relates to comprehensive knowledge of the Project gained via the relevant Land Use Approvals for the Project. The County will incur negligible continuing costs if the Petition is approved. The District is an independent unit of local government, so the District is responsible for its own budget, reporting, and the full conduct of its powers within its boundaries. The District will provide the County with its budget each year for the County’s review and comment, but no County action on the budget is required. Table 2 below outlines the Petitioner’s current good faith estimate of the capital facilities or services the District is planning on providing to the properties within the District. Page 5882 of 6355 4.2 Impact on State and Local Revenues Adoption of the proposed ordinance will have no negative impact on State or County revenues. The District is an independent unit of local government. The District is designed to provide community facilities and services to serve the Project. Any non-ad valorem assessments levied by the District will not count against any millage caps imposed on other taxing authorities providing services to the lands within the District. It is also important to note that any debt obligations the District may incur are not debts of the State of Florida or any other unit of local government. By Florida State law, debts of the District are strictly its own responsibility. 5.0 A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities required to comply with the requirements of the ordinance The District may impose non-ad valorem assessments on the properties within its boundaries to fund the both the installation of its public infrastructure and for the ongoing operation and maintenance of this infrastructure. Community development districts are efficient providers of maintenance services as they are subject to government bidding requirements, professionally managed, and have the ability to place non-ad valorem assessments on the County tax roll to fund these activities. A good faith estimate of the costs of the District’s public infrastructure is found below in Table 2. Page 5883 of 6355 Table 2. Proposed District Capital Improvements* Cost Estimates Category Estimated Budget $ Onsite Roads Paving & Grading $34,518,520 Stormwater Management Facilities & Drainage Drainage $15,003,390 Lake Excavation $15,542,100 On Site Water, IQ & Sewer Utilities Potable Water & Fire $14,766,500 Wastewater $22,359,000 IQ System $13,303,000 Trail System, Landscape, Streetscape, Signage, Electric & Street Lighting Electric & Street Lights $8,923,240 Landscaping & Irrigation $4,000,000 Traffic Signal $2,000,000 Offsite Utilities $14,699,875 Miscellaneous $1,285,226 Contingency $16,267,368 TOTAL $97,604,209 TOTAL (rounded)$175,700,000 TOTAL (rounded)$175,700,000 Regulatory Review & Inspection Fees $5,271,000 Mobilization $3,514,000 Design Fee $12,299,000 TOTAL $196,784,000 Source: LJA Engineering, Inc.*not all improvements may be owned, operated, and maintained by the CDD The public improvements outlined above will likely be funded through the District’s issuance of long-term bond debt. Repayment of the District’s bond debt will be secured by assessments levied on all properties within the District in proportion to the relative benefit received by each property within the District. Thus, the properties located within the District will be the sole security for the repayment of any debt issued by the District. Page 5884 of 6355 It is important to note that the costs incurred by the District in providing its infrastructure and services are typical for development of the type contemplated here. In other words, there is nothing peculiar about the District’s financing activities that would require additional funding over and above what would normally be needed. Therefore, these costs are not in addition to normal development costs. Thus, District-imposed assessments for operations and maintenance costs will be similar to what would be charged in any event by a property owners’ association common to most master planned commercial developments. Real estate markets are generally efficient, because property owners evaluate all of the costs and benefits associated with various alternative locations. The operations and maintenance charges for property within the Project must be in line with the competition. Furthermore, the decision by new property owners to locate within the District is completely voluntary. So, ultimately, all owners and users of the affected property choose to accept the District’s costs in exchange for the benefits that the District provides. 6.0 An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. There will be no impact on small businesses because of the formation of the proposed District. If anything, the impact may be positive. This is because the District must competitively bid certain of its contracts. This affords small businesses the opportunity to bid on District work. The District is not located within a county with a population of less than 75,000 or within a City with a population of less than 10,000. Therefore, the proposed District is not located in either a county or City that is defined as “small” by Florida Statute § 120.52. 7.0 Any additional useful information. It is useful to reflect upon the question of whether the proposed formation of the District is the best alternative for providing community facilities and services to the Project. As one alternative to the District, the County could approve an ad valorem assessment area for services. However, this alternative is inferior to the District. Unlike the District, it would require the County to continue to administer the project and its facilities and services. As a result, the costs for these services and facilities would not be fully sequestered to the land directly benefiting from them, as the case would be with the District. Another alternative to the District would be for the developer to use a property owners association (“POA”) for operations and maintenance of community facilities and services. A District is superior to a POA for a variety of reasons. First, unlike a POA, a District can impose and collect its assessments in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes. Therefore, the District is far more assured of obtaining Page 5885 of 6355 its needed operational funds than is a POA. Second, the proposed District is a unit of local government. Therefore, unlike the POA the District must abide by all governmental rules and regulations, including government-in-the-sunshine requirements. A District also is preferable to these alternatives from an accountability perspective. With a District as proposed, property owners within the District would have a focused unit of government under their direct control. The District can then be more responsive to property owner needs without disrupting other County responsibilities. PFM Group Consulting LLC certifies that this SERC meets the requirements for a SERC as set out in Chapter 120.541, F.S. PFM Group Consulting LLC (formerly Fishkind and Associates, Inc.) has developed over 100 SERCs for various clients. Below is a listing of some of the other community development district clients for which we have prepared SERCs. The Lake Nona “Family” of Community Development Districts in Orlando Urban Orlando (Baldwin Park) Community Development District in Orlando The Villages “Family” of Community Development Districts in Lake, Sumter, and Marion Counties Winter Garden Village at Fowler Groves Community Development District in Winter Garden Highlands Community Development District in Tampa The Tradition “Family” of Community Development Districts in Port St. Lucie Page 5886 of 6355 APPENDIX LIST OF DISTRICT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FLORIDA STATUTE REPORT SECTION DATE Annual Financial Audit 218.39 9 months after end of fiscal year Annual Financial Report (AFR) 218.32 Within 45 days after delivery of audit Financial Disclosure Form 1 112.3145 By July 1 Public Depositor 280.17 By November 30 Proposed Budget 190.008 By June 15 Adopted Budget 190.008 By October 1 Public Facilities Report 189.08 Initial report w/in 1 year of creation, Updates every 7 years Public Meetings Schedule 189.015 Beginning of fiscal year Notice of Bond Issuance 218.38 Within 120 days after delivery Registered Agent 189.014 30 days after first Board Meeting Notice of Establishment 190.0485 30 days after formation Creation Documents 189.016 30 days after adoption Notice of Public Finance 190.009 After financing Page 5887 of 6355 EXHIBIT 11EXHIBIT 11EXHIBIT 11EXHIBIT 11 EXHIBIT 11 Page 5888 of 6355 AUTHORIZATION OF AGENT This letter shall serve as a designation of Jonathan T. Johnson of Kutak Rock LLP, whose address is 107 West College Avenue, Tallahassee, Florida 32301, to act as agent for Collier Land Holdings, LTD and CDC Investment Properties, LLC (together “Petitioner”) with regard to all matters regarding the petition to establish a community development district to the Board of County Commissioners for Collier County, Florida, pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes. The petition is true and correct. This authorization shall remain in effect until revoked in writing. Collier Land Holdings, LTD., CDC Investment Properties, LLC., a Florida Limited Partnership by Tarpon Blue a Florida limited liability company, formerly CE Management, LLC, a Delaware limited known as CDC Land Investments, Inc., as liability company its Sole General Partner provided in the Articles of Conversion filed on September 13, 2022 with the Florida Secretary of State, by Tarpon Blue CE Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company its an Manager Name: Patrick L. Utter Title: Vice President i/ Z / il i] Name: Patrick L. Utter Title: Vice President STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of © physical presence or O online notarization this aA day of Coptember- , 2024, by Patrick L. Utter, as Vice President of Tarpon Blue CE Management, LLC, Sole General Partner of Collier Land Holdings, LTD and as Vice President of CDC Investment Properties, LLC, who is (personally known to me or O produced as identification. usu AuSable’ m (Official Notary Signature & Seal) SM. LAUREN TAYLOR CLARKE MORALES Print Name: LAWN Talor ar Ke Movad eG it; IR it} Commission # HH 261093 Notary Public, State of Florida TEE ROS Expires May 4, 2026 Page 5889 of 6355 [25-CMP-01237/1933208/1] 32 PL20250000514 | 3/25/2025 Page 1 of 5 ORDINANCE NO. 25 -____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE HORSE TRIALS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LOCATED IN UNINCORPORATED COLLIER COUNTY AND CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 1,767.35+/- ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE AUTHORITY FOR ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE BOUNDARIES FOR THE HORSE TRIALS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE DESIGNATION OF INITIAL BOARD MEMBERS; PROVIDING FOR THE DISTRICT NAME; PROVIDING STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONSENT TO SPECIAL POWERS; PROVIDING FOR PETITIONER’S COMMITMENTS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Collier Land Holdings, LTD and CDC Investment Properties, LLC, have petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, to establish the HORSE TRIALS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (“District”); and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, after proper published notice has conducted a public hearing on the petition and determined the following with respect to the factors to be considered in section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes, as required by section 190.005(2)(c), Florida Statutes: 1. The petition is complete in that it meets the requirements of § 190.005, Florida Statutes; and all statements contained within the petition are true and correct. 2. Establishment of the proposed District is not inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the local comprehensive plan of Collier County, known as the Collier County Growth Management Plan, or the State Comprehensive Plan. 3. The area of land within the proposed District is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community. 4. The District is the best alternative available for delivering community development services and facilities to the area that will be serviced by the District. CAOPage 5890 of 6355 [25-CMP-01237/1933208/1] 32 PL20250000514 | 3/25/2025 Page 2 of 5 5. The community development services and facilities of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community development services and facilities. 6. The area that will be served by the District is amenable to separate special-district government; and WHEREAS, it is the policy of this State, as provided for in section 190.002(2)(c), Florida Statutes, that the exercise by any independent district of its powers as set forth by uniform general law comply with all applicable governmental laws, rules, regulations, and policies governing planning and permitting of the development to be serviced by the district, to ensure that neither the establishment nor operation of such district is a development order under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and that the district so established does not have any zoning or permitting powers governing development; and WHEREAS, section 190.004(3), Florida Statutes, provides that all governmental planning, environmental, and land development laws, regulations, and ordinances apply to all development of the land within a community development district. Community development districts do not have the power of a local government to adopt a comprehensive plan, building code, or land development code, as those terms are defined in the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act. A district shall take no action which is inconsistent with applicable comprehensive plans, ordinances, or regulations of the applicable local general-purpose government. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: AUTHORITY FOR ORDINANCE This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to section 190.005(2), Florida Statutes, and other applicable provisions of law governing county ordinances. SECTION TWO: ESTABLISHMENT OF THE HORSE TRIALS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT The Horse Trials Community Development District is hereby established within the boundaries of the real property described in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. CAOPage 5891 of 6355 [25-CMP-01237/1933208/1] 32 PL20250000514 | 3/25/2025 Page 3 of 5 SECTION THREE: DISTRICT NAME The community development district herein established shall henceforth be known as “Horse Trials Community Development District”. SECTION FOUR: DESIGNATION OF INITIAL BOARD MEMBERS The following persons are herewith designated to be the initial members of the Board of Supervisors: 1. Mason Rose 999 Vanderbilt Beach Road Suite 507 Naples, Florida 34108 2. Jennifer Silguero 975 New Harvest Road Immokalee, Florida 34142 3. Manny Cordova 2639 Professional Circle Naples, Florida 34119 4. Margret Emblidge 7400 Trail Boulevard Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34108 5. Brandon Yarusi 999 Vanderbilt Beach Road Suite 507 Naples, Florida 34108 SECTION FIVE: STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE DISTRICT The Horse Trials Community Development District shall be governed by the provisions of Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and all other applicable general and local law. SECTION SIX: CONSENT TO SPECIAL POWERS Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, the Horse Trials Community Development District will be duly and legally authorized to exist and exercise all of its powers as set forth in section 190.012(1), Florida Statutes, and as otherwise provided by law. Further, the Board hereby consents to the exercise by the Board of Supervisors of the District of the special powers set forth in sections 190.012(2), Florida Statutes, to plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate, and maintain additional systems and facilities for: (i) parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational uses; (ii) security, including, but not limited to, guardhouses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion-CAOPage 5892 of 6355 [25-CMP-01237/1933208/1] 32 PL20250000514 | 3/25/2025 Page 4 of 5 detection systems, and patrol cars, when authorized by proper governmental agencies; provided, however that the District may not exercise any police power, but may contract with the appropriate local general-purpose government agencies for an increased level of such services within the District boundaries; and (iii) control and elimination of mosquitoes and other arthropods of public health importance; all as authorized and described in sections 190.012(2)(a), 190.012(2)(d), and 190.012(2)(e), Florida Statutes. SECTION SEVEN: PETITIONER’S COMMITMENTS The adoption of this Ordinance is predicated upon the following: that the Petitioner, its successors and assigns, shall (1) elect one resident of the District to the five member Board of Supervisors at such time as residents begin occupying homes in the District, and (2) record a Notice of Assessments containing the specific terms and conditions of any special assessments imposed to secure bonds issued by the District, which notice shall be recorded immediately after any such bond issuance. The Board of County Commissioners shall retain any and all rights and remedies available at law and in equity to enforce Petitioner’s Commitments against Petitioner, its successors and assigns. SECTION EIGHT: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION NINE: INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinances may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such, and the word “ordinance” may be changed to “section,” “article,” or any other appropriate word. SECTION TEN: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State. CAOPage 5893 of 6355 [25-CMP-01237/1933208/1] 32 PL20250000514 | 3/25/2025 Page 5 of 5 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ____ day of ___________________ 2025. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: ____________________________ By: ________________________________ , Deputy Clerk Burt L. Saunders, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: _______________________________ Derek D. Perry Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit “A” – Sketch and Legal Description of the District Boundaries CAO3/25/2025Page 5894 of 6355 [25-CMP-01237/1933208/1] Exhibit “A” Sketch and Legal Description of the District Boundaries CAOPage 5895 of 6355 CAOPage 5896 of 6355 !"#$% &%!"’#$ !%"#$( &&!"%# &’$ &!"%# $ !’"’#’%$’( &&!’"’# &$ &!"# $’ !"’#’$%( &&’!"# &$ &!"%# %$ %!"#’$( &&!"%# &$ &!"# $ !’"’#$( &&!"# &%$ &%’!"# ’$ %!"#$( &&’!’"# &%$ &!"# $ CAOPage 5897 of 6355 !"%#’$( &&!"# &’$ &!"%# ’$ !"’#’$( &&!"# &$ &!"’# ’$ ’!%"’#%$%( &&%!"# &$ &!"’# $%% !%"#$’( &&%!’"# &$ &’!"# $’ ’%!’%"#$( &&’!"’# &’$ &%!"# $ ’!"#$’( &&!%"%# &$ &%!"# $ !"#’$’’( &&!"’# &$ &%!"# $ !"#$( &&!"’# &’$ &!’"# %$’ ’!"’#$( &&!’"# &’$ &!"’# $ !"’#$( &&’!’"# &%’$ &!"# $% CAOPage 5898 of 6355 !"#’$( &&!"# &$ &%!%"’# ’$ ’!’"#$( &&!’"# &%$ &!"# $ %!"#$( &&!"# &’$ &!"# %$ !%"#’$( &&!"# &$ &!"# $ !"#$( &&!"# &$ &’!"# $ !"#$( &&!’"# &$ &!"# %$% !"’#’$( &&!’"# &%$ &!’"# %$’ %!’"#%$ ’!’"#’’$ ’!"’#’%$’ !"’#$( &&!"# &$ &%!"# $ ’!"#’$’( &&’!"# &$ &%!"’# ’$ !"#%$ CAOPage 5899 of 6355 !’"#’$%( &&!"# &$ &’!"%# $’ ’!%"’#%$’( &&!"# &$ &!"# $ !"#$% !’"%#$’( &&!"# &$ &%!"’# $ %!"#$%( &&!"# &%$ &%!"’# ’$’ %!"#$( &&’!"’# &’$ &!"%# $ !"#$( &&’’!’"# &’$ &!"’# ’%$% !"’#$( &&’!"%# &%’$ &’!"# %$% !’"#%$%( &&!"# &$ &!"# ’$% ’!"#’%$ %!"#’$ $(( $$’%)$$$&* !"’#$’ !"#$ !"#’$% (($$)+ $$$* CAOPage 5900 of 6355 &%!"#(( ’%$’(& &!"%#& $ (( &%!"#’’$ ((!’"# $%(&& %!"’#& $ (( &!"#’$ ((!"# %$ !"’#’$ , !’"#’$% !"#’$ , !"#’$ $ -$$ .%(CAOPage 5901 of 6355 1 ATTACHMENT 2 STAFF ANALYSIS RELATIVE TO THE SIX (6) FACTORS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FORMATION FOR HORSE TRIALS CDD Background: Section 190.005, Florida Statutes, outlines the specific content required in a Community Development District (CDD) petition and further outlines six (6) factors for the Board of County Commissioners to consider in determining whether to grant or deny a petition for the establishment of a CDD, as follows: 1. Whether all statements contained within the petition have been found to be true and correct. 2. Whether the creation of the district is inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government comprehensive plan. 3. Whether the area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community. 4. Whether the district is the best alternative available for delivering community development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the district. 5. Whether the community development services and facilities of the district will be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community development services and facilities. 6. Whether the area that will be served by the district is amenable to separate special-district government. Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the six factors referenced above and makes the following findings with regard to the proposed Horse Trials Community Development District: 1. Whether all statements contained within the petition have been found to be true and correct. Comprehensive Planning Department staff, along with the staff of the County Attorney's Office, has reviewed the referenced Community Development District petition. Based upon the review of the petition and sufficiency information, staff believes that the information found within these documents is substantially true and correct. 2. Whether the creation of the district is inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government comprehensive plan. Formation of the Horse Trials Community Development District is to provide infrastructure and services to approximately 3,205 dwelling units on 1,767.35± acres within the proposed Horse Page 5902 of 6355 2 Trials Stewardship Receiving Area (SRA). The Horse Trials SRA is currently in the review process. The entire land area of the Horse Trials CDD encompasses the proposed Horse Trials Village SRA. The future land use designation of the area and surrounding area are designated as Agricultural/Rural Mixed-Use District and is within the Rural Land Stewardship Area Overlay, as depicted on the Collier County Future Land Use Map. The proposed CDD will be a unit of local government established specifically for the purpose of carrying out the proposed development. The CDD does not authorize any form or amount of development not previously approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Therefore, staff finds that the establishment of the CDD is consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. As to consistency with the State Comprehensive Plan, the County staff notes that the CDD process is established within Section 190 of the Florida Statutes. The petitioner has not deviated from the standard process, as established by the Statute. Section 187.201, Florida Statutes, contains the text of the State's Comprehensive Plan. Subsection (2)(a) is the State Plan Goal for Governmental Efficiency, which reads as follows: " Goal. --Florida governments shall economically and efficiently provide the amount and quality of services required by the public." Policy 2 within this goal area reads as follows: "2. Allow the creation of independent special taxing districts which have uniform general law standards and procedures and do not overburden other governments and their taxpayers while preventing the proliferation of independent special taxing districts which do not meet these standards." As an "independent special taxing district", the proposed Horse Trials CDD is consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether the area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community. The proposed Horse Trials Community Development District, if approved, would be within the size range of other CDDs within Collier County at 1,767.35± acres. For instance, the Mediterra CDD is 1,647.87± acres, and Pelican Marsh CDD comprises 2,075.00± acres. Based upon previous experience and the subsequent success of other Collier County CDDs, Comprehensive Planning Department staff believes that the Horse Trials Community Development District meets the above criteria. 4. Whether the district is the best alternative available for delivering community development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the district. Page 5903 of 6355 3 As noted within Exhibit 10 (“Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs”) of the CDD petition, there are numerous alternatives available for the provision of infrastructure and services by and for an approved development. These include but are not limited to the following: private funding procured by the developer; establishment of a homeowner’s association; establishment of a Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU); establishment of a Municipal Services Benefit Unit (MSBU); establishment of a Community Improvement District (limited to drainage and irrigation related improvements); establishment of a County-managed special purpose district; or direct County management. All alternative options have various legal, financial or other limitations on their operations or do not provide a focused, compact approach to the provision of infrastructure and services. Therefore, staff finds that establishment of the proposed CDD is the best alternative available for delivering community development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the proposed district. 5. Whether the community development services and facilities of the district will be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community development services and facilities. The proposed CDD cannot develop any facilities and services that are incompatible with the surrounding area. This is because the CDD's sole purpose is to implement conditions and developer commitments that are part of the PUD approval. The District Board of Supervisors will not have the legal authority to implement any facilities, services or development that would be inconsistent with its existing development approvals. 6. Whether the area that will be served by the district is amenable to separate special- district government. Based upon staff findings concerning the previous five criteria, Comprehensive Planning Department staff finds that the subject area for the proposed CDD is amenable to special district government. Furthermore, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the Ordinance, as contained in Attachment 1, establishing the Horse Trials Community Development District. Page 5904 of 6355 MARCH 28 - APRIL 3, 2025 | BUSINESS OBSERVER _ CoffeeTallkk Wicked good IMAGE VIA KELLY’S ROAST BEEF FLORIDA / FACEBOOK Kelly's Roast Beef opened its north Naples location on March 19. A New England restaurant known for its made-to-order roast beef sandwiches and seafood now has five Florida locations, with its latest opening in Naples on March 19. Kelly’s Roast Beef welcomed custom- ers to its newest venture, in the Gateway Shoppes on Tamiami Trail North. The 3,500-square-foot restaurant offers dine- in, drive-thru and carryout service. The classic Kelly's roast beef sandwich features medium-rare roast beef, a sesame bun, James River BBQ sauce, mayonnaise and American cheese. The menu also features lobster rolls, homemade clam chowder, scallops, whole-bellied clams and soft-serve ice cream. Each restaurant roasts its beef in-house throughout the day, according to a. statement. This marks the second Kelly’s restau- rant for Naples, where an eatery opened in August 2023 in Founders Square, and it comes as the franchise is expanding on the Gulf Coast. Kelly's initialiy entered the Florida mar- ket in 2022 with the opening ofits location at University Town Center, the popular shopping and dining district in Sarasota and Manatee counties. The company deemed Florida a good location for franchising because ofits dynamic business climate, pandemic-era policies and the sizable number of New ‘Englanders who are residents, snowbirds or frequent visitors to the state, an execu- tive with Kelly’s Roast Beef Franchising told the Business Observer in 2023. Atthe time, the plan was to have 10 Florida res- taurants open in two years. With the opening of the Gateway Shop- pes restaurant on Wednesday, Kelly’s now has five locations in the Sunshine State: @ 8465 Dani Drive at Palmetto Commons, Fort Myers @ 8900 Founders Square Drive, Naples ® 13585 Tamiami Trail N., Naples B® 1530 Pasadena Ave. S., South Pasadena @ 5407 University Parkway, University Park Asixth location is expected to open this spring off US 301 at Creekside Commons in Parrish. The Kelly’s website also shows a restaurant is coming soon to 8140 Little Road in New Port Richey. RAVentures Hospitality is the franchisee for Kelly’s Roast Beef on the west coast of Florida, where officials say the concept has taken off. “Our guests in Southern Florida have proven that they enjoy Kelly’s uniquely New England fare along with the quality and value we bring to these communi- ties,” RAVentures Hospitality Regional Director Jeff Doward says in a statement. “We truly enjoy serving our crave-worthy food to both newcomers to Kelly's and to those who consider us a ‘taste of home’ for some of our locals and tourists from Kellv’s hometown in the Northeast.” The company has locations in Massa- chusetts and New Hampshire in addition to Florida. Kelly's was founded in 1951 outside Boston. Salvage sale COURTESY IMAGE The 11,632-square-foot industrial flex building was sold by Symphony Salvage. The Sarasota property long the home of Symphony Salvage has sold. The flex industrial building, which is 11,632 square feet and sits on 1.82 acres, was bought by a Myakka City LLC named the Keel Property Group. Sarasota County property records show that Keel paid $3.5 million and, according to other public records, took a $3.million mortgage on the property. ‘That mortgage is held.by an LLC belonging to the owners of Symphony Salvage. Chris DiBitetto, managing broker for the commercial real estate firm ERES Cos., says Symphony Salvage built the complex at 6289 Tower Lane in.2020.and sold it because it needed more space. Symphony Salvage, which is a go-be- tween for nonprofits and wholesale textile buyers, according to its Facebook profile, moved into a leased building nearly twice the size in Lakewood Ranch. A marketing flyer shows that along with warehouse space, the Tower Lane prop- erty has four private offices, a conference room and reception area, as well as a new HVAC and fire suppression systems. DiBitetto says the sale is a “high water mark” with the building selling for $300 per square foot, about $100 above the market, in 90 days. “It just speaks to speak to the demand,” DiBietto says. “We put that thing on the market two weeks before Christmas and my phone didn't stop ringing through the holidays. And then we were under contract in mid- January for a 30-day close. So it was fast.” Symphony Salvage paid $625,000 for the property in 2000, according to prop- erty records. BusinessObserverFL.com a F NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (the “Board”) will hold a public hearing on April 22, 2025, commencing at 9:00 a.m. in the Commission Board Room, Third Floor, W. Harmon Turner Building (Bldg. F), Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112. The purpose of the hearing is to consider the Establishment of a Community Development District to be known as the Horse Trials Community Development District by Collier. County Ordinance pursuant to Section 190.005(2), Florida Statutes. The title of the proposed ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE HORSE TRIALS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LOCATED IN UNINCORPORATED COLLIER COUNTY AND CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 1,767.35+/- ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE AUTHORITY FOR ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE BOUNDARIES FOR THE HORSE TRIALS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE DESIGNATION OF INITIAL BOARD MEMBERS; PROVIDING FOR THE DISTRICT NAME; PROVIDING STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONSENT TO SPECIAL POWERS; PROVIDING FOR PETITIONER’S COMMITMENTS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION INTHE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The proposed District is comprised of approximately 1,767.35+/- acres and located entirely within Collier County, Florida, and generally located north of County Road 858 (Oil Well Road), west of State Road 29, and east of Ranch One Road, as depicted on the map below. The proposed District, a special purpose government, is a way to provide infrastructure subject to the regulatory requirements of both the State of Florida and Collier County governing any existing or future lawful use and development of the land described below, and specifically governing the planning, implementation, maintenance, and financing of basic community facilities, systems, and services which may be required of any such development consistent with principles of concurrency, comprehensive planning, and development permitting. On January 15, 2025, Collier Land Holdings, LTD and CDC Investment Properties, LLC (together, “‘Petitioner”) filed its petition to establish the proposed District (the “Petition”) to Collier County, along with the application processing fee of $15,000 for review by the County. The Board’s consideration of the Petition will comply with Sections 190.005(2)(b) and (c), Florida Statutes. as well as Sections 190.012(1) and 190.012(2)(a) and (d) in conducting this hearing. The purpose of this hearing is to consider the relationship of the petition to the six factors listed in Section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes, and to determine whether Collier County will establish the Horse Trials Community Development District by adoption of an ordinance. A copy of the Petition and any of its documentation, including the statement of estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of Section 210.541, Florida Statutes, is available for review at the Office of the County Clerk, Collier County, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 401, Naples, Florida and at the County Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida. All interested persons and affected units of general-purpose government shall be given.an opportunity to appear at the hearing and present oral or written comments on the Petition. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he/she will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Lf you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112- 5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office, Project Location Camp Keais Road Oil Well Road Horse Trials Community Development District BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BURT L, SAUNDERS, CHAIR CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK 4eéaQ« Page 5905 of 6355 Page 5906 of 6355 Page 5907 of 6355