Loading...
Agenda 04/08/2025 Item #16B 2 (PRS for Contract #24-8313 Design Services for Everglades Blvd. Widening from Oil Well Rd. to Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Ext.)4/8/2025 Item # 16.B.2 ID# 2025-702 Executive Summary Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking for Request for Professional Services (“RPS”) No. 24- 8313, “Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext,” and authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with the top-ranked firm, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., so that staff can bring a proposed agreement back for the Board’s consideration at a future meeting. OBJECTIVE: To approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS No. 24-8313 and direct staff to negotiate an agreement to engage professional design services for the Everglades Boulevard Widening project. CONSIDERATIONS: This design project encompasses a three-mile segment of Everglades Boulevard from Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (Phase II) to Oil Well Road. The proposed roadway improvements will widen Everglades from a two-lane undivided road to a four-lane divided collector. The proposed improvements are intended to increase connectivity and traffic capacity for the Estates community, and include other roadway enhancements such as turn lanes, bicycle lanes, pedestrian facilities, signal system upgrades, and improved drainage and stormwater management. Roadway lighting justification for the corridor will also be established. Consistent with the Long-Range Transportation Plan and Objective, the final improvements are intended to maintain an acceptable level of service and safety. Where needed, the County plans to acquire the necessary right-of-way along Everglades Boulevard. As documented in the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization’s 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan, the Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road Corridor Study, and the Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road Project Development and Environment Study, the widening of Everglades Boulevard is a key component of the County’s future plans to improve the overall traffic network and system connectivity in Golden Gate Estates and the eastern Collier County area. On October 17, 2014, the Procurement Services Division posted RPS No. 24-8313, “Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext,” and received five responsive and responsible proposals by the November 18, 2024, deadline. The evaluation criteria included the ability of the professional personnel, past performance, project approach, workload of the firm, and other performance-based criteria. The solicitation also required the firms to submit references from clients on projects of a similar size for which the firms provided services similar in scope and complexity. On January 8, 2025, the selection committee scored each of the proposals and shortlisted the three top firms. On January 27, 2025, the selection committee met for presentations from those firms and arrived at the following ranked order: Firm Names Final Ranking Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1 Kimley-Horn & Associates Inc. 2 Patel, Greene & Associates, LLC 3 Staff is requesting authorization to begin negotiations with the top-ranked firm, Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. In the event that an agreement cannot be reached with Jacobs, staff will continue negotiating with the remaining ranked firms in an effort to bring a proposed agreement back for the Board’s consideration. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., is a qualified design consultant that has designed numerous road and bridge projects in Collier County over the past 20 years. Jacob’s civil engineering/survey sub-consultant, Johnson Engineering, is also a qualified local engineering firm with extensive experience working on County projects. Subject to the Board’s approval of the above recommendation, staff will begin contract negotiations with Jacobs in accordance with the Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act, Florida Statutes § 287.055, so that a proposed agreement can be brought back for the Board’s consideration at a future meeting. This item is consistent with the Collier County strategic plan objective to design and maintain an effective transportation system to reduce traffic congestion and improve the mobility of the County's residents and visitors. Page 1158 of 5277 4/8/2025 Item # 16.B.2 ID# 2025-702 FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this item does not result in a direct fiscal impact; however, the source of funding for the future contract (subject to Board approval at a subsequent meeting) will be Impact Fees/ Gas Taxes and/or General Fund. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management impact. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for Board approval. —SRT RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve the selection committee’s ranking for Request for Professional Services No. 24- 8313, “Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext,” and authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with the top ranked firm, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., so that staff can bring a proposed agreement back for the Board’s consideration at a future meeting. PREPARED BY: Robert White, PE, Project Manager III, Transportation Engineering ATTACHMENTS: 1. 24-8313 - Solicitation 2. 24-8313 NORA_Executed 3. 24-8313 Final Ranking 4. 24-8313 Jacobs Engineering Proposal Page 1159 of 5277 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (RPS) In accordance with Florida Statute 287.055 Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act FOR Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext RPS NO.: 24-8313 MATTHEW WEBSTER, PROCUREMENT STRATEGIST PROCUREMENT SERVICES DIVISION 3295 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, BLDG C-2 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 TELEPHONE: (239) 252-8491 Matthew.Webster@colliercountyfl.gov (Email) This proposal solicitation document is prepared in a Microsoft Word format (rev 8/16/17). Any alterations to this document made by the Consultant may be grounds for rejection of proposal, cancellation of any subsequent award, or any other legal remedies available to the Collier County Government. Page 1160 of 5277 SOLICITATION PUBLIC NOTICE REQUEST FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (RPS) NUMBER: 24-8313 PROJECT TITLE: Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext RPS OPENING DAY/DATE/TIME: November 18, 2024 at 3:00 PM EST PLACE OF RPS OPENING: Procurement Services Division 3295 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg. C-2 Naples, FL 34112 All proposals shall be submitted online via the Collier County Procurement Services Division Online Bidding System: https://procurement.opengov.com/ INTRODUCTION As requested by the Transportation Engineering Division (hereinafter, the “DIVISION”), the Collier County Board of County Commissioners Procurement Services Division (hereinafter, “COUNTY”) has issued this Request for Professional Services (hereinafter, “RPS”) with the intent of obtaining proposals from interested and qualified Consultants in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications stated or attached. At a minimum, the Consultant must achieve the requirements of the specified Scope of Work. BACKGROUND This project encompasses a three-mile section of Everglades Boulevard from Oil Well Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension. The proposed roadway improvements will widen Everglades from a two-lane undivided road to a four-lane divided arterial. These improvements shall increase connectivity and traffic capacity for the Estates community. The improvements proposed will provide other roadway enhancements such as turn lanes, bicycle lanes, pedestrian facilities, signal upgrades, and improved stormwater drainage. Consistent with the Long-Range Transportation Plan and Objective, these improvements will maintain an acceptable level of service and safety. TERM OF CONTRACT The County reserves the right to modify this scope during negotiations for budgetary reasons. The contract term, if an award is made, will commence on the date of the Notice to Proceed and end upon acceptance and approval of the final payment. Prices shall remain firm for the term of the awarded contract. Surcharges will not be accepted in conjunction with this award, and such charges should be incorporated into the pricing structure. DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK 1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Exhibit is to describe the scope of work and the responsibilities of the CONSULTANT and the COUNTY in connection with the design and preparation of a complete set of construction contract documents and incidental engineering services, as necessary, for improvements to the transportation facility described herein. Provide services as defined in this Scope of Services, which references the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) manuals and procedures. For this project, the CONSULTANT and/or Sub-Consultant(s) must be FDOT qualified (Rule Chapter 14-75) to perform the required work and/or services. At a minimum, the CONSULTANT and/or Sub-Consultant(s) must be qualified to perform the following types of work: Major work mix includes: 0221 Widen & Resurface Existing Lanes 0205 Sidewalk 0715 Traffic Engineering Study 0716 Traffic Signals Page 1161 of 5277 0774 Signing/Pavement Markings 0777 Lighting Major work groups include:  3.2 Major Highway Design  4.1 Miscellaneous Structures and Minor Bridge Design  6.1 Traffic Engineering Studies  6.2 Traffic Signal Timing  7.1 Signing, Pavement Marking & Channelization  7.2 Lighting  7.3 Signalization  8.1 Control Surveying  8.2 Design, Right of Way, and Construction Surveying  8.3 Photogrammetric Mapping  8.4 Right of Way Mapping  9.1 Soil Exploration  9.2 Geotechnical Classification Lab Testing  9.3 Highway Materials Testing  9.4 Foundation Studies  9.5 Geotechnical Specialty Lab Testing Minor work groups include:  6.1 Traffic Engineering Studies  6.3.1 ITS Analysis & Design  7.1 Signing, Pavement Marking & Channelization  7.2 Lighting  7.3 Signalization  8.1 Control Surveying  8.2 Design, Right of Way, and Construction Surveying  8.4 Right of Way Mapping  9.1 Soil Exploration  9.2 Geotechnical Classification Lab Testing  9.3 Highway Materials Testing  9.4 Foundation Studies  9.5 Geotechnical Specialty Lab Testing The general objective is for the CONSULTANT to prepare a set of contract documents, including plans, specifications, supporting engineering analysis, calculations, and other technical documents in accordance with FDOT and COUNTY policy, procedures, and requirements. These Contract documents will be used by the contractor to build the project and test the project components. These Contract documents will be used by the COUNTY or its Construction Engineering Inspection (CEI) representatives for inspection and final acceptance of the project. The CONSULTANT shall follow a systems engineering process to ensure that all required project components are included in the development of the Contract documents and that the project can be built as designed and to specifications. The Scope of Services establishes which items of work in the FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance (Florida Greenbook), COUNTY Code and other pertinent manuals are specifically prescribed to accomplish the work included in this contract and also indicate which items of work will be the responsibility of the CONSULTANT and/or the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall be aware that as a project is developed, certain modifications and/or improvements to the original concepts may be required. The CONSULTANT shall incorporate these refinements into the design and consider such refinements Page 1162 of 5277 to be an anticipated and integral part of the work. This shall not be a basis for any supplemental fee request(s). The CONSULTANT shall demonstrate good project management practices while working on this project. These include communication with the COUNTY and others as necessary, management of time and resources, and documentation. The CONSULTANT shall set up and maintain throughout the design of the project a contract file in accordance with COUNTY procedures. CONSULTANTs are expected to know the laws and rules governing their professions and are expected to provide services in accordance with current regulations, codes and ordinances and recognized standards applicable to such professional services. The CONSULTANT shall provide qualified technical and professional personnel to perform to COUNTY standards and procedures, the duties and responsibilities assigned under the terms of this agreement. The CONSULTANT shall minimize to the maximum extent possible the COUNTY'S need to apply its own resources to assignments authorized by the COUNTY. The COUNTY will provide contract administration, management services, and technical reviews of all work associated with the development and preparation of contract documents, including Construction documents. The COUNTY'S technical reviews are for high-level conformance and are not meant to be comprehensive reviews. The CONSULTANT shall be fully responsible for all work performed and work products developed under this Scope of Services. The COUNTY may provide job-specific information and/or functions as outlined in this contract if favorable. It is imperative that all signal, roadway lighting, and signing and pavement marking designs be reviewed and approved by Collier County Traffic Operations at each phase of the project. The designer shall adhere to the current Collier County Traffic Operations specifications to minimize redesign. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & BACKGROUND The project encompasses a 3-mile section of Everglades Boulevard, from the intersection with Oil Well Road extending south past the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension. Oil Well Road intersects with a series of future planned communities while Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (under construction) provides a direct route for those commuting from the Estates to Naples. The improvements proposed will provide connectivity and roadway enhancements to those communities and improve emergency response times and safety along the corridor. The CONSULTANT shall investigate the status of any active and/or recently completed projects and become familiar with concepts and commitments (typical sections, alignments, Developer Contribution Agreements, etc.) developed from prior studies and/or activities. The CONSULTANT shall incorporate all future improvements by “others” as an existing condition unless otherwise directed by the COUNTY Project Manager. The existing typical section, going southbound from Oil Well Road to 29th Avenue NE, starts as a 6-lane divided highway and tapers down to two lanes, respectively. There are bike lanes, but they end at 31st Avenue NE. There are no pedestrian facilities. The existing typical section of the undivided roadway from 29th Avenue NE to Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension consists of two 12-foot travel lanes, narrow unpaved shoulders, and roadside ditches on both sides. No sidewalks or bike lanes are on either side of the existing roadway. The proposed roadway improvements for this project consist of additional lane width and shoulders by widening to the west of the existing roadway, stormwater drainage and ponds, and traffic signals. The new typical roadway section will have four 11-foot wide travel lanes with 7-foot bike lanes on each side along the entire length of the project. On the west side of the roadway a 6-foot concrete sidewalk will be constructed to connect paths from Oil Well Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension. Traffic signals are installed at the intersections of Everglades Boulevard and the following streets:  Randall Boulevard  18th Avenue NE, and  Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Phase II (currently under design) 2.1 Project General and Roadway (Activities 3, 4, and 5) Public Involvement: See Public Involvement Scope, Section 3.1 Page 1163 of 5277 Other Agency Presentations/Meetings: See Public Involvement Scope, Section 3.1 Joint Participation Agreements: N/A Local Agency Program Agreement: N/A Specification Package Preparation: See Specifications Package Preparation, Section 3.3 Value Engineering: Value Engineering/Independent Peer Review services will be conducted for this project. Please review Section 3.5 for details. Plan Type: Roadway Plans Plan/Profile: The CONSULTANT shall provide all plans and details necessary for the construction of the project described herein. The CONSULTANT is expected to follow all design criteria and processes provided in the latest version of the FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction, and Maintenance (commonly known as the Florida Greenbook). Additional criteria from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), the Construction Standards Handbook for Work Within the Public Right-of-way Collier County, Florida, and the Collier County Urban Land Development Code (CCULDC) should also be utilized. The latest FDOT Design Manual (FDM) criteria and the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Bikeway Design Guide should be considered for best practice. The COUNTY must approve deviations from the criteria and processes provided in the FDM in writing. Typical Section: The CONSULTANT shall develop and submit a signed and sealed Typical Section Package. Pavement Designs: The CONSULTANT shall provide all pavement designs required for the project. The CONSULTANT shall submit a signed and sealed Pavement Design Package before the 30% plan submittal for COUNTY approval. Pavement Type Selection Report(s): N/A Cross Slope: As needed. The CONSULTANT shall evaluate any necessary modifications to cross slopes of existing pavement to be retained as part of this project. Access Management Classification: The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with adjacent developments to ensure proposed or existing access connections are incorporated in the plans. The County and Developer must agree on the location, number of access point connections, and type of median openings. Transit Route Features: The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the PTNE (CAT) to identify existing and future transit locations. Major Intersections/Interchanges: The design shall incorporate the tie-in of the project to the existing conditions at:  Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension. (Phase II is currently in design)  18th Ave NE  Randall Boulevard  Oil Well Road Minor Intersections: The design shall incorporate the tie-in of the project to the existing conditions at:  10th Ave NE  12th Ave NE  14th Ave NE  16th Ave NE Page 1164 of 5277  20th Ave NE  22nd Ave NE  24th Ave NE  27th Ave NE  29th Ave NE  31st Ave NE Bridges: N/A Roadway Alternative Analysis: N/A Level of Temporary Traffic Control Plans (TTCP): The project is anticipated to require Level II Plans. Therefore, the CONSULTANT shall provide Temporary Traffic Control Plans appropriate for this level. Ensuring public health, safety, and welfare during construction is critical. Special consideration shall be given to local businesses and emergency services access through the work zone. The CONSULTANT shall develop maintenance of traffic plans that limit impacts to the public while minimizing the cost and duration of construction. Temporary Lighting: The CONSULTANT is responsible for any temporary lighting designs necessary for the project. Temporary Signals: Only if required for Maintenance of Traffic Temporary Drainage: The CONSULTANT is responsible for any temporary drainage designs necessary for the project and ensures that the design maintains positive drainage at all times. Design Variations/Exceptions: Two (2) are anticipated (Bike Lanes 5 ft vs 7 ft, Shared use pathway offset). The CONSULTANT is responsible for designing and applying all variances, clearances, and waivers. Back of Sidewalk Profiles: The CONSULTANT shall perform all engineering analysis for the project, even if it is not included in the delivered plans. Selective Clearing and Grubbing: TBD Landscaping: See Section 3.12 2.2 Drainage (Activities 6a and 6b) System Type: As required. The stormwater systems shall be designed to meet the permitting requirements of all applicable permitting agencies (South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Florida Environmental Protection (FDEP), and the United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACE)). The stormwater system designs shall consider best management practices, such as open system, closed system, lateral ditches, exfiltration, etc., or a combination thereof, within or outside the existing right-of-way. Floodplain compensation may be part of the solution within or outside the existing right-of-way. The design/coordination of all off-site ponds is part of this Scope of Services. The Consultant shall explore if existing ponds at Oilwell and Everglades have additional capacity for this project. The CONSULTANT shall develop all hydraulic requirements, designs, and Construction Contract Documents for all hydraulic features, such as but not limited to all stormwater conveyance, storage, and treatment facilities required for the project. All existing drainage structures and features shall be shown on the construction plans and shall be inspected for existing scour, erosion, structural integrity, and accumulation of sediments as necessary. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate all repairs or modifications with the COUNTY Project Manager before adding them to the Construction Contract Documents. 2.3 Utilities Coordination (Activity 7) The CONSULTANT is responsible for certifying that all necessary arrangements for utility work on this project have been Page 1165 of 5277 made and will not conflict with the physical construction schedule. The CONSULTANT should coordinate with COUNTY personnel to coordinate transmittals to Utility Companies and meet production schedules. The CONSULTANT shall ensure FDOT and Collier County standards, policies, procedures, practices, and design criteria are followed concerning utility coordination. The CONSULTANT may employ more than one individual or utility engineering consultant to provide utility coordination and engineering design expertise. The CONSULTANT shall identify a dedicated person responsible for managing all utility coordination activities. This person shall be contractually referred to as the Utility Coordination Manager and shall be identified in the CONSULTANT proposal. The Utility Coordination Manager shall be required to satisfactorily demonstrate to the COUNTY Project Manager that they have the following knowledge, skills, and expertise:  A minimum of 4 years of experience performing utility coordination in accordance with FDOT, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards, policies, and procedures.  A thorough knowledge of the FDOT plans production process and Collier County Water and Sewer District (CCWSD) coordination processes.  A thorough knowledge of COUNTY agreements, standards, policies, and procedures. The Utility Coordination Manager shall be responsible for managing all utility coordination, including the following:  Assuring that Utility Coordination and accommodation is in accordance to the FDOT, FHWA, and AASHTO standards, policies, procedures, and design criteria.  Assisting the engineer of record in identifying all existing utilities and coordinating any new installations. Assisting the Engineer of Record with resolving utility conflicts.  Scheduling and performing utility coordination meetings, keeping and distribution of minutes/action items of all utility meetings, and ensuring expedient follow-up on all unresolved issues.  Distributing all plans, conflict matrixes and changes to affected utility owners and making sure this information is properly coordinated and documented.  Identifying and coordinating the completion of any COUNTY or utility owner agreement that is required for reimbursement, or accommodation of the utility facilities associated with the project.  Review and certify to the COUNTY Project Manager that all Utility Work Schedules are correct and in accordance with the COUNTY's standards, policies, and procedures.  Prepare, review and process all utility related reimbursable paperwork inclusive of betterment and salvage determination. The CONSULTANT's utility coordination work shall be performed and directed by the Utility Coordination Manager that was identified and approved by COUNTY Project Manager. Any proposed change of the approved Utility Coordination Manager shall be subject to review and approval by COUNTY Project Manager prior to any change being made in this contract. Anticipated utilities include but not limited to:  CenturyLink/Lumen  City of Naples- Water  Comcast  Florida Power and Light  Crown Castle  Summit Broadband, Inc.  TECO Peoples Gas  Collier County IT  Collier County Water and Sewer District  Collier County Traffic Operations 2.4 Environmental Permits and Environmental Clearances (Activity 8) Page 1166 of 5277 The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with all appropriate regulatory agencies to obtain all necessary permits, which may include but are not limited to:  Environmental Resource Permit (SFWMD)  Right-of-way Occupancy Permit (BCB/SFWMD)  FDEP Section 404 Permit  USACE Nationwide Permit The CONSULTANT is responsible for identifying, applying for, and obtaining all necessary permits for the project. The CONSULTANT is responsible for all permit coordination and revisions necessary to obtain the required permits. The CONSULTANT shall obtain COUNTY approval of the plans and applications before submitting them to the permitting agencies and assist the COUNTY in developing the permitting strategy for the project. The COUNTY shall pay all application and processing fees associated with permitting activities directly to each applicable agency. The COUNTY will direct the use of mitigation banks as required. 2.5 Structures (Activities 9 - 18) Bridge: N/A Bridge Number: N/A Please see section 2.1 for typical section requirements. Type of Bridge Structure Work: N/A  BDR or Bridge Type Study  Temporary Bridge  Short Span Concrete  Medium Span Concrete Retaining Walls: The CONSULTANT shall provide all design services and deliver construction documents for any temporary and/or permanent retaining walls required for the project. Noise Barrier Walls: The County will consider noise impacts on the corridor due to adding new travel lanes; however, due to the significant number of driveways, an insertion loss design goal of 7dB(A) may not be reached, and reasonably cost less than $42,000. If these goals are met from the results of the Noise Study (Activity 32), the design of the barrier will be negotiated separately. Miscellaneous Structures: The CONSULTANT shall provide all design services and deliver construction documents for any miscellaneous structures required for the project. 2.6 Signing and Pavement Markings (Activities 19 & 20) The CONSULTANT shall provide all design services and deliver construction documents for all signing and pavement markings required for the project. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY’s Traffic Operations Section to maintain the integrity of COUNTY’s sign asset database. The CONSULTANT shall include the following notes in the contract documents, “Contractor to follow Traffic Operations Signing and Pavement Markings special provision details which include but are not limited to using a 2.5” x 2.5” galvanized metal square tubular signpost.” 2.7 Signalization (Activities 21 & 22) The existing Randall Boulevard and 18th ST NE signal systems are spanwire with concrete strain poles. These shall be Page 1167 of 5277 upgraded to mast arm configurations. The Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Phase II project will construct a signal at Everglades Boulevard, which may be in place before the construction of this project. The CONSULTANT should consider this an existing condition and coordinate the signal plans as necessary. Traffic Data Collection: The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY’S Transportation Planning and Traffic Operations sections to see if required traffic data is available. Traffic Studies: TBD Count Stations: TBD Traffic Monitoring Sites: TBD 2.8 Lighting (Activities 23 & 24) The CONSULTANT shall include lighting design within the project limits. The CONSULTANT shall provide all design services and deliver construction documents for all lighting required for the project. The CONSULTANT will analyze the luminescence needs for the project and offer recommendations for street lighting compatible with a four-lane configuration for Everglades Boulevard, documented in a lighting justification report and a lighting design analysis report. For budgeting purposes, the CONSULTANT will assume the entire corridor will be lit for report(s) (Lighting and Voltage Drop) purposes. However, intersection lighting will only be part of the basic scope of services. The COUNTY will direct the CONSULTANT if full corridor lighting is to be implemented; this will be considered an additional service. 2.9 Landscape (Activities 25 & 26) Landscape Irrigation or Planting Plans: These are not included in this Project. The required level of landscaping shall consist of proposed conduits and sleeves for future landscaping areas and adding architectural pavers in designated median locations along with topsoil. 2.10 Survey (Activity 27) Design Survey: The CONSULTANT shall provide all surveying services necessary for the project. It is anticipated this will include a detailed topographic and control survey for the project limits extending approximately 500 feet north of Oil Well Road to 500 feet south of 10th Avenue NE and to the edge of the existing ROW, including all access points in between, beyond or within Collier County existing ROW. The 11 intersecting side streets will be surveyed approximately 300 feet in each direction. Randall Boulevard shall be surveyed 750 feet in each direction. If an outfall is located at a side street(s), the limits of the survey shall extend to that outfall point, including the side street swales. At a minimum, anticipate five (5) outfalls; more than six (6) outfalls will be considered an additional service. Pond sites will be surveyed once locations are finalized. At a minimum, anticipate six (6) pond sites. Additional pond sites will be considered an additional service. Boring Layout: The CONSULTANT shall provide boring locations for the proposed mast arms at 18th Ave NE, and Randall Boulevard. Subsurface Utility Exploration: The CONSULTANT is responsible for designating all utilities within the project limits. The CONSULTANT shall employ the standards for Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) per the American Society of Civil Engineers accepted guidelines for the collection and depiction of existing subsurface utility data using Quality Level “A” at any proposed mast arm foundations in an area two (2) times the proposed drilled shaft diameter prior to the final design. Proposed SUE locations must be approved by the COUNTY prior to authorization of this task. Right of Way Survey: The CONSULTANT is responsible for all Right of Way Surveys and defining all official Collier County maintained right of way necessary for the project. Pond Site and Floodplain Compensation Area: The CONSULTANT shall identify ponds within the project limits. Vegetation Survey: N/A Page 1168 of 5277 Bathymetric Survey: N/A 2.11 Photogrammetry (Activity 28) – N/A 2.12 Mapping (Activity 29) Control Survey Map: The CONSULTANT is responsible for the Control Survey Maps necessary for the project. Right-of-Way Map: The CONSULTANT is responsible for all Right-of-Way Maps for right-of-way acquisitions necessary for the project. Legal Descriptions and Sketches: The CONSULTANT is responsible for all Legal Descriptions and Sketches and for Technical Memorandums for right-of-way acquisitions necessary for the project. Obtaining any Title Searches that may be required is the CONSULTANT's responsibility. Copies of all Title Searches shall be furnished to the COUNTY upon receipt. Maintenance Map: The CONSULTANT shall provide an aerial-based maintenance map utilizing Collier County Aerial Mapping for the project limits, showing the local agency's jurisdictional areas. Miscellaneous Items: N/A 2.13 Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR (Activity 30) – N/A 2.14 Architecture (Activity 31) – N/A 2.15 Noise Barriers (See Activities 2.5 & 32) 2.16 Intelligent Transportation Systems (Activities 33 & 34) – N/A 2.17 Geotechnical (Activity 35) The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for all necessary geotechnical activities associated with/required for this project. Types of boring anticipated include roadway, structures, storm pipes, ponds, lighting, and signals. 2.18 3D Modeling (Activity 36) – N/A 2.19 Project Schedule The anticipated design schedule for the project is 720 calendar days (approx. 24 months) from the date of Notice to Proceed (NTP). The targeted total contract schedule is 1,620 calendar days (approx. 54 months) from the issuance of the NTP. This will consist of a design phase (720 days), a construction bid phase (150 days) and a post design phase (750 days). A separate NTP will be issued for the post design services phase. Within ten (10) days after the NTP is issued, and prior to the CONSULTANT beginning work, the CONSULTANT shall provide a detailed project activity/event schedule in Microsoft Project for COUNTY and CONSULTANT to meet the completion date(s) for all phases of design. The CONSULTANT shall indicate each milestone activity/event that is included in the scope of work and at a minimum, submission dates for Bridge Inspection Report, 30% plans, 60% plans, 90% plans, Final plan, and SFWMD submittal packages. The schedule shall allow for a minimum of 30 calendar days for FDOT and/or COUNTY reviews of the 30% plans, 60% plans, 90% plans and Final plans. All fees and price proposals are to be based on a contract schedule of 1620 calendar days for final construction contract documents and post design services. In no event shall the contract deadline exceed 1620 calendar days from the date of initial Notice to Proceed. Page 1169 of 5277 An independent consulting firm hired by the COUNTY will conduct a constructability review between the 60% and 90% plan submittals. The Bid Plans shall be submitted after obtaining a notice of intent to permit from the governing permitting agencies, which may include FDEP, USACE, and SFWMD. Periodically, throughout the life of the contract, CONSULTANT shall review the project schedule and, with the approval of the COUNTY, adjust as necessary to incorporate changes in the Scope of Services and progress to date. The approved schedule and schedule status report and progress report shall be submitted with the monthly progress report and invoice. 2.20 Submittals & Deliverables The CONSULTANT shall furnish construction contract documents as the COUNTY requires to adequately control, coordinate, and approve the project concepts. At each submittal phase, the CONSULTANT shall provide all sheets pertaining to the roadway design and those of the other component plans in strict conformance to the FDOT Design Manual sequence of plans preparation. Partial-phase deliverables will not be accepted. The COUNTY prefers to use the Bluebeam Revu Studio software platform to expedite the design reviews. The CONSULTANT shall set up studio project collaboration sessions in Bluebeam at each phase submittal if the CONSULTANT is accustomed to and uses this platform. The CONSULTANT shall manage the marked-up documents so that comments can be tracked and are easily organized for hard copy print outs. The comment and review process for all deliverables for this Contract shall utilize Bluebeam Studio Sessions. The CONSULTANT’s Bluebeam setup shall include comment tracking and a response mechanism. The CONSULTANT shall provide session access to COUNTY’s staff (and other independent CONSULTANTs) as identified by COUNTY Project Manager. The CONSULTANT shall provide a response to each comment until the comment is identified and marked with a “CLOSED” status by the Reviewer. The CONSULTANT shall maintain copies of all Session files and submit to COUNTY as supplementary files to the Final Deliverable. Use of Bluebeam Sessions for submittal reviews (including setup, upload and maintain comment records) is considered as part of the design approval process; subsequently no separate payment shall be made for Bluebeam Sessions. If the CONSULTANT does not have the use of Bluebeam, a File Transfer server should be used to submit deliverables in Adobe PDF format. All submitted documents shall be digitally signed and sealed in accordance with applicable Florida Statutes. All documents shall be developed and submitted in accordance with the latest edition of the FDOT Greenbook unless otherwise directed by the COUNTY in writing. Each submittal shall include one (1) digital copy of all documents required for the submittal as defined herein. The method of delivery must be preapproved by the COUNTY. In addition to the delivery of the files produced during project development, the COUNTY requires the inclusion of Engineering Data files (prepared by or for the CONSULTANT) for critical geometrics in the design. These can include the alignments, profiles, cross sections, surfaces, etcetera necessary to create the corridor model(s). Critical roadway geometric items, such as the centerlines and profiles of the proposed mainline, side streets, special ditches, and utilities, must be included. These Engineering Data files are considered “Project Documents” as defined in the contract and shall be provided when the COUNTY requests. Drawing files shall be provided in most current versions of a fully functional MicroStation V8i (.dgn) or AutoCAD 2019(.dwg) or later software format and plotted or scanned to an Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format in individual sheets. Specifications shall be provided in Microsoft Word 2003 or later. The CONSULTANT shall use the most current FDOT CADD Manual to produce engineering plans preparation. The CADD Manual addresses the requirements to utilize Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) for the production and delivery of digital project data. 2.21 Provisions for Work All work shall be prepared with English units (unless otherwise specified) in accordance with the latest editions of standards and requirements utilized by the COUNTY which include, but are not limited to, publications such as: Page 1170 of 5277  General o Title 29, Part 1910, Standard 1910.1001, Code of Federal Regulations (29 C.F.R. 1910.1001) – Asbestos Standard for Industry, U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) o 29 C.F.R. 1926.1101 – Asbestos Standard for Construction, OSHA o 40 C.F.R. 61, Subpart M - National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) o 40 C.F.R. 763, Subpart E – Asbestos-Containing Materials in Schools, EPA o 40 C.F.R. 763, Subpart G – Asbestos Worker Protection, EPA o Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards for Accessible Design o AASHTO – A Policy on Design Standards Interstate System o AASHTO – Roadside Design Guide o AASHTO – Roadway Lighting Design Guide o AASHTO – A Policy for Geometric Design of Highways and Streets o AASHTO – Highway Safety Manual o Rule Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), Standards of Practice for Professional Surveyors and Mappers o Chapter 469, Florida Statutes (F.S.) – Asbestos Abatement o Rule Chapter 62-257, F.A.C., Asbestos Program o Rule Chapter 62-302, F.A.C., Surface Water Quality Standards o Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) o Florida Administrative Codes (F.A.C.) o Chapters 20, 120, 215, 455, Florida Statutes (F.S.) – Florida COUNTY of Business & Professional Regulations Rules o Florida Department of Environmental Protection Rules o FDOT Basis of Estimates Manual o FDOT Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) Manual o FDOT Standard Plans o FDOT Flexible Pavement Design Manual o FDOT – Florida Roundabout Guide o FDOT Handbook for Preparation of Specifications Package o FDOT Standard Plans Instructions o FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways (“Florida Greenbook”) o FDOT Materials Manual o FDOT Pavement Type Selection Manual o FDOT Design Manual o FDOT Procedures and Policies o FDOT Procurement Procedure 001-375-030, Compensation for Consultant Travel Time on Professional Services Agreements o FDOT Project Development and Environment Manual o FDOT Project Traffic Forecasting Handbook o FDOT Public Involvement Handbook o FDOT Rigid Pavement Design Manual o FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction o FDOT Utility Accommodation Manual o Manual on Speed Zoning for Highways, Roads, and Streets in Florida o Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) - Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) o FHWA – National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 672, Roundabouts: An Informational Guide o FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) and Guideline Handbook o Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Standard Manatee Construction Conditions 2005 o Florida Statutes (F.S.) o Florida’s Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual for Planning o Model Guide Specifications – Asbestos Abatement and Management in Buildings, National Institute for Building Sciences (NIBS) o Quality Assurance Guidelines Page 1171 of 5277 o Safety Standards o Any special instructions from the COUNTY  Roadway o FDOT – Florida Intersection Design Guide o FDOT – Project Traffic Forecasting Handbook o FDOT – Quality/Level of Service Handbook o Florida’s Level of Service Standards and Highway Capacity Analysis for the SHS o Transportation Research Board (TRB) – Highway Capacity Manual  Permits o Chapter 373, F.S. – Water Resources o US Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species Programs o Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Protected Wildlife Permits o Bridge Permit Application Guide, COMDTPUB P16591.3C o Building Permit  Drainage o FDOT Bridge Hydraulics Handbook o FDOT Culvert Handbook o FDOT Drainage Manual o FDOT Erosion and Sediment Control Manual o FDOT Exfiltration Handbook o FDOT Hydrology Handbook o FDOT Open Channel Handbook o FDOT Optional Pipe Materials Handbook o FDOT Storm Drain Handbook o FDOT Stormwater Management Facility Handbook o FDOT Temporary Drainage Handbook o FDOT Drainage Connection Permit Handbook o FDOT Bridge Scour Manual  Survey and Mapping o All applicable Florida Statutes and Administrative Codes o Applicable Rules, Guidelines Codes, and authorities of other Municipal, COUNTY, State and Federal Agencies. o FDOT Aerial Surveying Standards for Transportation Projects Topic 550-020-002 o FDOT Right of Way Mapping Handbook o FDOT Surveying Procedure Topic 550-030-101 o Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way Procedures Manual o Florida Department of Transportation Surveying Handbook o Right of Way Mapping Procedure 550-030-015  Traffic Engineering and Operations and ITS o AASHTO - An Information Guide for Highway Lighting o AASHTO - Guide for Development of Bicycle Facilities o FHWA Standard Highway Signs Manual o FDOT Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies (MUTS) o FDOT Median Handbook o FDOT Traffic Engineering Manual o National Electric Safety Code o National Electrical Code  Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise o Florida’s Turnpike Plans Preparation and Practices Handbook (TPPPH) o Florida’s Turnpike Lane Closure Policy o Florida’s Turnpike Drainage Manual Supplement o Rigid Pavement Design Guide for Toll Locations with Electronic Toll Collection o Flexible Pavement Design Guide for Toll Locations with Electronic Toll Collection o Florida’s Turnpike General Tolling Requirements (GTR) o Additional Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise standards, guides, and policies for design and construction can be found on the FTE Design Website: http://design.floridasturnpike.com Page 1172 of 5277  Traffic Monitoring o American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) Manual of Steel Construction, referred to as “AISC Specifications” o American National Standards Institute (ANSI) RP-8-00 Recommended Practice for Roadway Lighting o AASHTO AWS D1.1/ANSI Structural Welding Code – Steel o AASHTO D1.5/AWS D1.5 Bridge Welding Code o FHWA Traffic Detector Handbook o FDOT General Interest Roadway Data Procedure o FHWA Traffic Monitoring Guide o FDOT’s Traffic/Polling Equipment Procedures  Structures o AASHTO Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Bridge Design Specifications and Interims o AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Bridge Design Specifications and Interims o AASHTO Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires and Traffic Signals, and Interims. o AASHTO/-AWS-D1. 5M/D1.5: An American National Standard Bridge Welding Code o AASHTO Guide Specifications for Structural Design of Sound Barriers o AASHTO Manual for Condition Evaluation and Load and Resistance Factor Rating (LRFR) of Highway Bridges o FDOT Bridge Load Rating Manual o FDOT Structures Manual o FDOT Structures Design Bulletins (available on FDOT Structures web site only)  Geotechnical o FHWA Checklist and Guidelines for Review of Geotechnical Reports and Preliminary Specifications o Manual of Florida Sampling and Testing Methods o Soils and Foundation Handbook  Landscape Architecture o Florida COUNTY of Agriculture and Consumer Services Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants  Architectural o Building Codes o Florida Building Code:  Building  Fuel Gas  Mechanical  Plumbing  Existing Building o Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction o Rule Chapter 60D, F.A.C., Division of Building Construction o Chapter 553, F.S. – Building Construction Standards o ANSI A117.1 2003 Accessible and Usable Building and Facilities o Titles II and III, Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), Public Law 101-336; and the ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG)  Architectural – Fire Codes and Rules o National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) - Life Safety Code o NFPA 70 - National Electrical Code o NFPA 101 - Life Safety Code o NFPA 10 - Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers o NFPA 11 - Standard for Low-Expansion Foam Systems o NFPA 11A - Standard for High- and Medium-Expansion Foam Systems o NFPA 12 - Standard for Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems o NFPA 13 - Installation of Sprinkler Systems o NFPA 30 - Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code o NFPA 54 - National Gas Fuel Code o NFPA 58 - LP-Gas Code o Florida Fire Prevention Code as adopted by the State Fire Marshal– Consult with the Florida State Fire Marshal’s office for other frequently used codes. Page 1173 of 5277  Architectural – Extinguishing Systems o NFPA 10 - Fire Extinguishers o NFPA 13 - Sprinkler o NFPA 14 - Standpipe and Hose System o NFPA 17 - Dry Chemical o NFPA 20 - Centrifugal Fire Pump o NFPA 24 - Private Fire Service Mains o NFPA 200 - Standard on Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems  Architectural – Detection and Fire Alarm Systems o NFPA 70 - Electrical Code o NFPA 72 - Standard for the Installation, Maintenance and Use of Local Protective Signaling Systems o NFPA 72E - Automatic Fire Detectors o NFPA 72G - Installation, Maintenance, and Use of Notification Appliances o NFPA 72H -Testing Procedures for Remote Station and Proprietary Systems o NFPA 74 - Household Fire Warning Equipment o NFPA 75 - Protection of Electronic Computer Equipment  Architectural – Mechanical Systems o NFPA 90A - Air Conditioning and Ventilating Systems o NFPA 92A - Smoke Control Systems o NFPA 96 - Removal of Smoke and Grease-Laden Vapors from Commercial Cooking Equipment o NFPA 204M - Smoke and Heating Venting  Architectural – Miscellaneous Systems o NFPA 45 - Laboratories Using Chemicals o NFPA 80 - Fire Doors and Windows o NFPA 88A - Parking Structures o NFPA 105- Smoke and Draft-control Door Assemblies o NFPA 110 - Emergency and Standby Power Systems o NFPA 220 - Types of Building Construction o NFPA 241 - Safeguard Construction, Alteration, and Operations o Rule Chapter 69A-47, F.A.C., Uniform Fire Safety For Elevators o Rule Chapter 69A-51, F.A.C., Boiler Safety  Architectural – Energy Conservation o Rule Chapter 60D-4, F.A.C., Rules For Construction and Leasing of State Buildings To Insure Energy Conservation o Section 255.255, F.S., Life-Cycle Costs  Architectural – Elevators o Rule Chapter 61C-5, F.A.C., Florida Elevator Safety Code o ASME A-17.1, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators o Architectural – Floodplain Management Criteria o Section 255.25, F.S., Approval Required Prior to Construction or Lease of Buildings o Rules of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)  Architectural – Other o Rule Chapter 64E-6, F.A.C., Standards for On Site Sewage Disposal Systems (Septic Tanks) o Rule Chapter 62-600, F.A.C., Domestic Wastewater Facilities o Rule Chapter 62-761, F.A.C., Underground Storage Tank Systems o American Concrete Institute o American Institute of Architects - Architect’s Handbook of Professional Practice o American Society for Testing and Materials - ASTM Standards o Brick Institute of America o DMS - Standards for Design of State Facilities o Florida Concrete Products Association o FDOT – ADA/Accessibility Procedure o FDOT – Building Code Compliance Procedure o FDOT – Design Build Procurement and Administration o LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Building Rating System o National Concrete Masonry Association Page 1174 of 5277 o National Electrical Code o Portland Cement Association - Concrete Masonry Handbook o United State Green Building Council (USGBC) 2.22 Services to be Performed by the COUNTY when appropriate and /or available, the COUNTY will provide project data including:  All certifications necessary for project letting.  All information that may come to the COUNTY pertaining to future improvements.  All future information that may come to the COUNTY during the term of the CONSULTANT’s Agreement, which in the opinion of the COUNTY is necessary for the prosecution of the work.  Available traffic and planning data.  Engineering standards review services.  All available information in the possession of the COUNTY pertaining to utility companies whose facilities may be affected by the proposed construction  All future information that may come to the COUNTY pertaining to subdivision plans so that CONSULTANT may take advantage of additional areas that can be utilized as part of the existing right of way.  Previously constructed Highway Beautification or Landscape Construction Plans  Existing right of way maps (if available)  PD&E Documents  Design Reports (if available)  Letters of authorization designating the CONSULTANT as an agent of the COUNTY in accordance with F.S. 337.274.  Phase reviews of plans and engineering documents.  Regarding Environmental Permitting Services: o Approved Permit Document when available. o Approval of all contacts with environmental agencies. o Payment for permitting and mitigation fees o General philosophies and guidelines of the COUNTY to be used in the fulfillment of this contract. Objectives, constraints, budgetary limitations, and time constraints will be completely defined by the Project Manager. o Appropriate signatures on application forms. 3 PROJECT COMMON AND PROJECT GENERAL TASKS Project Common Tasks Project Common Tasks, as listed below, are work efforts that are applicable to many project activities, 4 (Roadway Analysis) through 36 (3D Modeling). These tasks are to be included in the project scope in each applicable activity when the described work is to be performed by the CONSULTANT. Project Research: The CONSULTANT shall perform research on existing PD&E Studies, DCA, PUD, and DRI documents that are applicable for developments adjacent to the project for commitments regarding Right-of-way, Stormwater Management, Roadway Improvements, or any other commitments involving the interests of the COUNTY. Cost Estimates: The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for producing an opinion of probable construction cost estimate and reviewing and updating the cost estimate at project milestones – Phase I (30%), II (60%), III (90%), and IV (100% or final) including the bid schedule. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for inputting the pay items and quantities into a Summary of Pay Items sheet with all required Plans submittals as required. Technical Special Provisions: The CONSULTANT shall provide Technical Special Provisions for all items of work not covered by the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and recurring special provisions. Standard Specifications, recurring special provisions, and supplemental specifications should not be modified unless necessary to control project-specific requirements. The first nine sections of the FDOT standard specifications, recurring special provisions, and supplemental specifications shall be modified with written approval of the COUNTY. The Technical Special Provisions shall provide a description of work, materials, equipment, and specific requirements, method of measurement, and basis of payment. Page 1175 of 5277 When printed or copied, these provisions shall be formatted on 8-1/2"x11" sheets. Technical Special Provisions will be developed using Microsoft Word (.doc). Furnishing electronic copy in a format other than Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) will not be accepted. If the COUNTY requests another format than specified herein, it shall be considered an additional service. Supplemental Terms and Conditions (Exhibit I): The CONSULTANT shall provide Supplemental Terms and Conditions (STC) as required by the project. Supplemental Terms and Conditions are defined as follows: A Supplemental Terms and Conditions shall not modify the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction in any way. Still, they shall provide instructions to the contractor regarding the contract documents not covered by the FDOT’s Standard Specification and are not classified as a Technical Special Provision. STCs are project-specific and related to the COUNTY’s general procedures and practices and take precedence over any conflicting terms in the order of contract documents. Field Reviews: The CONSULTANT shall make as many trips to the project site as required to obtain necessary data for all project elements. Technical Meetings: The CONSULTANT shall attend all technical meetings necessary to execute the Scope of Services of this contract. This includes meetings with COUNTY and FDOT or other Agency staff, between disciplines and subconsultants, such as access management meetings, pavement design meetings, local governments, railroads, airports, progress review meetings (phase review), and miscellaneous meetings. The CONSULTANT shall prepare and submit to the COUNTY Project Manager to review the meeting minutes for all meetings they attend. The meeting minutes are due within five (5) working days of attending the meeting. Quality Assurance/Quality Control: The CONSULTANT shall be accountable for their work's professional quality, technical accuracy, and quality. CONSULTANT-prepared surveys, construction plans, and contract documents that contain errors or omissions and result in cost and time overruns on a construction project may result in a claim against the CONSULTANT per F.S. 337.015 (3). The CONSULTANT shall, through all stages of design and project construction, without additional compensation, correct all errors or deficiencies in the designs, maps, drawings, specifications and/or other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. The CONSULTANT shall provide a Quality Control Plan that describes the procedures to be utilized to verify, independently check, and review all maps, design drawings, specifications, and other documentation prepared as a part of the contract. The CONSULTANT shall describe how the checking and review processes will be documented to verify that the required procedures were followed. The Quality Control Plan shall be one specifically designed for this project. The CONSULTANT shall submit a Quality Control Plan for approval within twenty (20) business days of the written Notice to Proceed and it shall be signed by the CONSULTANT’s Project Manager and the CONSULTANT’s QC Manager. The Quality Control Plan shall include the names of the CONSULTANT’s staff that will perform the quality control reviews. The Quality Control reviewer shall be a Florida Licensed Professional Engineer fully prequalified under F.A.C. 14-75 in the work type being reviewed. A marked-up set of prints from a Quality Control Review indicating the reviewers for each component (structures, roadway, drainage, signals, geotechnical, signing and marking, lighting, surveys, etc.) and a written resolution of comments on a point-by-point basis will be required, if requested by the COUNTY, with each phase submittal. The responsible Professional Engineer, Landscape Architect, or Professional Surveyor & Mapper that performed the Quality Control review will sign a statement certifying that the review was conducted and found to meet the required specifications. The CONSULTANT shall, without additional compensation, correct all errors or deficiencies in the designs, maps, drawings, specifications and/or other products and services. Independent Peer Review: The COUNTY will furnish the Independent Peer Review tasks under a separate contract at 30%, 60%, and 90% design submittal phases and occur concurrently with ERC/COUNTY review. The CONSULTANT shall provide the Independent Peer Reviewer access to all project plans and documents when requested. The independent peer review does not relieve the CONSULTANT from the responsibility of their internal quality control process and shall remain accountable for the professional quality and technical accuracy of their work product. The Independent Peer Review for design Phase Plans submittals shall ensure the plans meet the FDM, the FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways (“Florida Greenbook”), Standard Plans and FDOT CADD Manual. The Constructability/Biddability Review shall ensure the project can be constructed and paid for as designed. Constructability/Biddability Reviews should be conducted prior to the 90% and Final submittals, using the FDOT Phase Review Checklist (Guidance Document 1-1-A) from the Construction Project Administration Manual (CPAM) as a minimum guideline. The CONSULTANT shall submit this checklist, as well as the “marked-up” set of plans during this review, and review comments and comment responses from any previous Constructability/Biddability reviews. These items will be reviewed by COUNTY Page 1176 of 5277 Project Manager. Supervision: The CONSULTANT shall supervise all technical design activities. Coordination: The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with all disciplines of the project to produce a final set of construction documents. Project General Tasks Project General Tasks, described in Sections 3.1 through 3.7 below, represent work efforts that are applicable to the project as a whole and not to any one or more specific project activity. The work described in these tasks shall be performed by the CONSULTANT when included in the project scope. 3.1 Public Involvement The CONSULTANT shall prepare for and attend (2) public meetings after the 30% and 60% Phases as directed by the COUNTY. Public involvement includes communicating to all interested persons, groups, and government organizations information regarding the development of the project. The CONSULTANT shall provide to the COUNTY drafts of all Public Involvement documents (i.e., newsletters, property owner letters, advertisements, etc.) associated with the following tasks for review and approval at least five (5) business days prior to printing and / or distribution. Public input will heavily influence construction schedule, construction phasing and maintenance of traffic for the project defined herein. The CONSULTANT shall develop coordinated project solutions that will maintain necessary public access during construction. The public meetings will be scheduled after the 30% and 60% submittals and may be a public workshop. The goal of the public meeting will be to show all the design components of the project to the public and receive feedback. The CONSULTANT shall process the public information received, discuss the results with the Project Manager, and advise the County of the economic, cultural, and social feasibility of implementing the request. If approved, the CONSULTANT will integrate the needs of the public into the project. The CONSULTANT shall develop and provide all necessary exhibits for the public meetings, meeting agenda, sign-in sheets, and meeting minutes. Collect Public Input: This activity occurs throughout the life of the project, requiring the CONSULTANT to maintain files, newspaper clippings, letters, emails, and any record of direct contact before, during, and after the Public Workshops. Input will be gathered during the Public Workshops or by other methods, such as personal contact, letters, surveys, visits, phone calls, and website comments in response to or following said meeting. Comments and Coordination Report: The CONSULTANT shall prepare a comments and coordination report containing documentation of the public participation accomplished throughout the design period. This report should summarize and respond to the comments from the public involvement workshops, agency coordination, etc. 3.1.1 Community Awareness Plan Prepare a Community Awareness Plan (CAP) for review and approval by the COUNTY within 30 calendar days after receiving Notice to Proceed. The objective of the plan is to notify local governments, affected property owners, tenants, and the public of the COUNTY’S proposed construction and the anticipated impact of that construction. The CAP shall address timeframes for each review and shall include tentative dates for each public involvement requirement for the project. The CAP will also document all public involvement activities conducted throughout the project’s duration. In addition to the benefits of advance notification, the process should allow the COUNTY to resolve controversial issues during the design phase. This item shall be reviewed and updated periodically as directed by the COUNTY throughout the life of the project. 3.1.2 Preparing Mailing Lists At the beginning of the project, The CONSULTANT shall identify all impacted property owners and tenants Page 1177 of 5277 (within a minimum of 300 feet of the project corridor in all directions) The CONSULTANT shall develop and maintain a computerized database of contacts, beginning with a list of those notified in the Kickoff Notification Process, Public officials, community service organizations, environmental agencies, local and regional transportation officials, and special interest groups shall be identified by the CONSULTANT as those individuals or groups to be affected by the project. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a mailing list of all such entities and shall update the mailing list as needed during the life of the project. 3.1.3 Median Modification Letters – N/A The CONSULTANT shall include a Typical Section of Everglades Boulevard in the Public Involvement Meeting Mailing(s) and Project Newsletter(s) and wording related to the proposed roadway modification from undivided to divided. 3.1.4 Driveway Modification Letters – N/A The ROW Agreements will address the driveway modifications. The Sketch and Descriptions for the ROW acquisition and Temporary Driveway Restoration Easements will be available for discussions with individual homeowners affected. The Plans and Public Involvement displays will reflect the required modifications. 3.1.5 Newsletters If requested by the COUNTY, the CONSULTANT shall prepare and mail a newsletter on COUNTY Letterhead for distribution to elected officials, public officials, property owners along the corridor, and other interested parties. 3.1.6 Renderings and Fly-Throughs The CONSULTANT shall prepare renderings and fly-throughs for use in public meetings. 3.1.7 PowerPoint Presentations The CONSULTANT shall prepare PowerPoint presentations for use in public meetings. 3.1.8 Public Meeting Preparations The CONSULTANT shall prepare the necessary materials for use in all public meetings. The COUNTY will investigate potential meeting sites to advise the CONSULTANT on their suitability. The COUNTY will pay all costs for meeting site rents and insurance. No COUNTY meetings will be held on public school system properties. 3.1.9 Public Meeting Attendance and Follow-up The CONSULTANT shall attend the public meetings, assist with meeting setup, and take down. The CONSULTANT shall also prepare a summary of each public meeting that includes all copies of all materials shown or provided at the public meeting. The summary shall also include a listing of all written comments made during or after the meeting and responses to those written comments. The CONSULTANT shall attend the meetings with an appropriate number of personnel to assist the COUNTY Project Manager. The CONSULTANT shall anticipate two public information meetings and one public hearing during the design process. Other Agency Meetings. In addition to scheduled public meetings the CONSULTANT may be required to participate in meetings with local governing authorities and/or Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Homeowner’s Associations, Community Development District Board, and Golf Club Board. The CONSULTANT’s participation may include, but not be limited to, presentations during the meeting, note taking, and summarizing the meeting in a memo to the file. It is estimated that for this project there will be at least two (2) meetings with each of the entities mentioned earlier. Page 1178 of 5277 3.1.10 Web Site CONSULTANT shall provide Public Involvement Graphics to the COUNTY for its Website. 3.2 Joint Project Agreements – See Section 2.1 3.3 Specifications Package Preparation The CONSULTANT shall prepare and provide a specifications package for those specifications NOT considered FDOT Standard Specifications. The CONSULTANT shall obtain Lighting and Traffic Signal Specifications from the COUNTY’S Traffic Operations website. The specifications package shall address all items and areas of work and include any Mandatory Specifications, Modified Special Provisions, and Technical Special Provisions. The specifications package must be submitted for review to the COUNTY Project Manager at least 30 days prior to the 90% plans submittal. This submittal does not require signing and sealing and shall be coordinated through the COUNTY Project Manager. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY on the submittal requirements, but at a minimum shall consist of (1) the complete specifications package, (2) a copy of the marked-up workbook used to prepare the package, and (3) a copy of the final project plans. Final submittal of the specifications package must occur at least 10 working days prior to the Final 100% plan submittal. This submittal shall be signed, dated, and sealed in accordance with applicable Florida Statutes. 3.4 Contract Maintenance and Project Documentation The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for contract maintenance, which includes project management efforts for the complete setup and maintenance of files, electronic folders, and documents, as well as developing technical monthly progress reports and schedule updates. Project documentation includes but is not limited to the compilation and delivery of final documents, reports or calculations that support the development of the contract plans; it includes uploading files to an FTP server. 3.5 Value Engineering (Multi-Discipline Team) Review – N/A 3.6 Prime Consultant Project Manager Meetings Includes only the Prime CONSULTANT Project Manager's time for travel and attendance at Activity Technical Meetings and other meetings listed in the meeting summary for Task 3.6 on tab 3 Project General Task of the staff hour forms. Staff hours for other personnel attending Activity Technical Meetings are included in the meeting task for that specific Activity. 3.7 Plans Update The effort needed for Plans Update services will vary from project to project, depending on size and complexity of the project, as well as the duration of time spent "on the shelf". Specific services will be negotiated as necessary as a contract amendment. 3.8 Post-Design Services Post Design Services may include, but not be limited to meetings, bidding assistance, construction assistance, plans revisions, shop drawing review, survey services, as-built drawings, and load ratings. The CONSULTANT will provide the COUNTY the following limited services during the bid phase and construction phase: Pre-Bid Conference The CONSULTANT shall: • Attend the pre-bid conference to receive oral/written questions regarding interpretation and clarification of Bid Documents. • Respond to bidders written questions regarding interpretation and clarification of Bid Documents • Assist the COUNTY with Addenda. Page 1179 of 5277 Review Bids The CONSULTANT shall: • Evaluate bidders’ qualification and ability to perform the work per the Plans and Specifications. • Evaluate bids, via Bid Analysis, to ensure all quantities and costs are consistent with the Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost. Any significant deviation shall be documented and justified. • Providing written letters of recommendation Management Engineering Services The CONSULTANT shall perform the management engineering services (as requested by the COUNTY) to help facilitate the activities of the parties involved in accomplishing completion of the project. The CONSULTANT shall provide interpretations of the plans, specifications and contract provisions; and to make recommendations to the COUNTY to resolve disputes which arise in relation to the construction contract. Services include the following: • Attend the pre-construction conference with the low bidder. • Assist the COUNTY with interpretation of the plans, specifications, and contract provisions, the CONSULTANT shall consult with the County when an interpretation involves complex issues or may impact the cost and duration of performing the work. • Assist the COUNTY with analyzing changes to the plans, specification, or contract provisions and extra work which appear to be necessary to carry out the intent of the contract when it is determined that a change or extra work is necessary and such work is within the scope and intent of the original contract. Recommend such changes to the County for approval. • Assist the COUNTY with monitoring the project to the extent necessary to determine whether construction activities violate the requirements of the permits. Notify the contractor of any violations or potential violations and require his immediate resolution of the problem. • The CONSULTANT shall, receive, review, reject and/or approve shop drawings, product data and test results to be submitted by the contractor for all pertinent items needed in construction. The CONSULTANT shall review the submittals to determine satisfactory compliance with the project plans and specifications, noting his approval or stipulations. Determine the acceptability, subject to County approval, of substitute materials and equipment proposed by the contractor and receive and review (for general content as required by the specifications) maintenance operating instructions, schedules, guarantees and certificates of inspection which are to be assembled by the contractor in accordance with the contract documents. • The CONSULTANT shall attend, up to 18, COUNTY monthly construction conferences with the contractor, COUNTY, and Utility Companies to discuss in detail the requirements and responsibilities for such items as contractor’s responsibilities for shop drawings submittal, maintenance of traffic, safety, etc. • Upon completion of construction and upon preparing the record drawings from as-built drawings provided by the contractor, the CONSULTANT shall prepare the required certification of completion letters to SFWMD, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), and other permitting agencies as required. • The CONSULTANT shall conduct the necessary site visits to address any design related questions that may arise during construction. • Upon Substantial Completion of construction and establishment of the Final Punchlist items, the County may request the Consultant to provide a cost estimate for the Final Punchlist items. The Consultant shall conduct a site walkthrough to have a better understanding of the Final Punchlist items to properly estimate the Final Punchlist cost. • Provide contract document interpretation and assistance in addressing requests for information (RFI) and unforeseen conditions when requested by the COUNTY. • Assist COUNTY with South Florida Water Management (SFWMD) permit certification, including reviewing contractor’s as-built plans, preparing certification form and submittal to the agency. • Periodic meeting attendance (assumes one (1) meeting per month during construction.) and field visits (as required to respond to RFI’s and review construction progress). • Assist COUNTY with shop drawing review(s). • Review and assist in field changes, including minor redesign, as requested by the COUNTY. • Perform a review of contractor’s final as-built drawings. • Attend one (1) substantial completion walk through and (1) one final completion meeting in the field. Post Design Services are not intended for instances of CONSULTANT errors and/or omissions. All CONSULTANT contact with the Contractor shall be made through the COUNTY Construction Project Manager. The CONSULTANT shall not contact the Contractor directly unless there is a possible immediate threat to public health and/or safety. The COUNTY Page 1180 of 5277 Construction Project Manager must be contacted immediately thereafter. The COUNTY CEI is responsible for confirming that all quality control testing and requirements of the approved Quality Control Plan have been executed and the results are satisfactory per the design requirements. The CONSULTANT shall visit the construction site at key phases of the project to verify as-built conditions. This will require the CONSULTANT to coordinate with the COUNTY Project Manager during construction and attend construction meetings as required or requested by the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall meet with the COUNTY Project Manager during the Quality Control submittal/review to establish the anticipated stages of construction. The CONSULTANT must notify the COUNTY Project Manager of any design related issues as soon as possible. It is important that all significant changes made during construction be documented by the Contractor in the final as- built plans. The Contractor shall markup sheets requiring minor (non-engineering analysis) as-built changes and show those changes on the Final Signed and Sealed As-Built Signature Sheet(s). Major changes resulting in the issuance of revised contract documents must also be included in the as-built package and recorded appropriately on the Final Signed and Sealed As-built Signature Sheet(s). CONSULTANT will provide electronic Plans to Contractor for preparation of As-Built Drawings by Contractor. Any changes proposed by the Contractor must be signed and sealed by the Contractor’s EOR and approved by the CONSULTANT. This may be a Cost Savings Initiative Proposal (CSIP) redesign or an original design of certain components, including Shop Drawings. All original documents obtained by the CONSULTANT will be turned over to the COUNTY at the project’s close-out or upon request by the COUNTY. All documents obtained for inclusion in the Final As-Built Documents Package must be Quality Control reviewed by the CONSULTANT to ensure correctness and legibility. The CONSULTANT shall contact the COUNTY if any deficiencies are identified. The Final As-Built Document Package Certification(s) must be digitally signed and sealed by the CEI Consultant. Quality assurance material testing shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. 3.9 Digital Delivery The CONSULTANT shall deliver final contract plans and documents in digital format. The final contract plans and documents shall be digitally signed and sealed files delivered to the COUNTY on acceptable electronic media, as determined by the COUNTY. Deliverables shall be provided in both pdf and CADD formats. 3.10 Risk Management – N/A 3.11 Railroad, Transit and/or Airport Coordination – N/A 3.12 Landscape and Existing Vegetation Coordination – N/A 3.13 Transit Coordination The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY Project Manager and Transit Coordinator to include any features needed by the Collier Area Transit (CAT). 3.14 Other Project General Tasks The CONSULTANT shall assist the COUNTY during the construction bidding phase of the project including, but not limited to, attending the pre-bid meeting, addressing addendums, evaluating bids and bidders, and providing written letters of recommendation. 4 ROADWAY ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Roadway Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. 4.1 Typical Section Package The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Typical Section Package. 4.2 Pavement Type Selection Report – N/A 4.3 Pavement Design Package Page 1181 of 5277 The CONSULTANT shall provide an approved Pavement Design Package at the 30% plan submittal. The COUNTY shall approve the Pavement Design prior to proceeding with the 60% design. 4.4 Cross-Slope Correction The CONSULTANT shall investigate the existing pavement to be retained as part of the project and include in the design any required correction of existing cross-slopes. Cross slope information will be collected at 100’ intervals. After the analysis of the cross slopes a recommendation will be provided as part of the pavement report. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with Collier County Road Maintenance to help identify any known locations which may be deficient. 4.5 Horizontal/Vertical Master Design Files The CONSULTANT shall design the geometrics using the design standards that are most appropriate with proper consideration given to the design traffic volumes, design speed, capacity and levels of service, functional classification, adjacent land use, design consistency and driver expectancy, aesthetics, existing vegetation to be preserved, pedestrian and bicycle concerns, ADA requirements, Safe Mobility For Life Program, access management, PD&E documents, and scope of work. The CONSULTANT shall also develop utility conflict information to be provided to the project Utility Coordinator in the format requested by the COUNTY. 4.6 Access Management The CONSULTANT shall incorporate access management standards for each project in coordination with COUNTY staff. The CONSULTANT shall review adopted access management standards and the existing access conditions (interchange spacing, signalized intersection spacing, median opening spacing, and connection spacing). Median openings that will be closed, relocated, or substantially altered shall be shown on plan sheets and submitted with supporting documentation for review with the first plan’s submittal. 4.7 Roundabout Final Design Analysis – N/A The CONSULTANT shall finalize the design of the roundabout in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. The CONSULTANT shall perform a final roundabout operational analysis that recommends a functional geometric layout that is cost effective, safe and meets the needs of the community. A final roundabout design will be recommended for implementation, and all geometric and operational analysis will be documented in a final roundabout report. 4.8 Cross Section Design Files The CONSULTANT shall establish and develop cross-section design files in accordance with the applicable FDOT CADD manual sections for the Bentley Microstation platform. The CONSULTANT shall Coordinate with all utility owners to obtain the location of subsurface facilities. The cross sections will show both existing locations and proposed relocations of all utilities. 4.9 Temporary Traffic Control Plan (TTCP) Analysis The CONSULTANT shall design a safe and effective TTCP to move vehicular and pedestrian traffic during all phases of construction. The design shall include construction phasing of roadways ingress and egress to existing property owners and businesses, routing, signing and pavement markings, and detour quantity tabulations, roadway pavement, drainage structures, ditches, front slopes, back slopes, drop offs within clear zone, transit stops, and traffic monitoring sites. Special consideration shall be given to the construction of the drainage system when developing the construction phases. Positive drainage must be maintained at all times. The design shall include construction phasing of roadways to accommodate the construction or relocation of utilities when the contract includes Joint Project Agreements (JPAs). The CONSULTANT shall investigate the need for temporary traffic signals, temporary highway lighting, detours, diversions, lane shifts, and the use of materials such as sheet piling in the analysis. The Traffic Control Plan shall be prepared by a certified designer who has completed training as required by the COUNTY. Before proceeding with the TTCP, the Page 1182 of 5277 CONSULTANT shall meet with the appropriate COUNTY personnel. The purpose of this meeting is to provide information to the CONSULTANT that will better coordinate the Preliminary and Final TTCP efforts. The CONSULTANT shall consider the local impact of any lane closures or alternate routes. When the need to close a road is identified during this analysis, the CONSULTANT shall notify the COUNTY's Project Manager as soon as possible. Proposed road closings must be reviewed and approved by the COUNTY. Diligence shall be used to minimize negative impacts by appropriate specifications, recommendations or plans development. Local impacts to consider will be local events, holidays, peak seasons, detour route deterioration and other eventualities. CONSULTANT shall be responsible to obtain local authorities’ permission for use of detour routes not on state highways. 4.10 Master TTCP Design Files The CONSULTANT shall develop master TTCP files showing each phase of the TTCP. This includes all work necessary for designing lane configurations, diversions, lane shifts, signing and pavement markings, temporary traffic control devices, and temporary pedestrian ways. 4.11 Selective Clearing and Grubbing – N/A 4.12 Tree Disposition Plans – N/A 4.13 Design Variations and Exceptions The CONSULTANT shall prepare the documentation necessary to gain COUNTY and FDOT approval of all appropriate Design Variations and/or Design Exceptions before the first submittal. 4.14 Design Report The CONSULTANT shall prepare applicable report(s) as listed in the Project Description section of this scope. The CONSULTANT shall submit to the COUNTY design notes, data, and calculations to document the design conclusions reached during the development of the contract plans. The design notes, data, and computations shall be recorded on size 8½"x11" sheets, fully titled, numbered, dated, indexed, and signed by the designer and the checker. Computer output forms and other oversized sheets shall be folded to 8½"x11" size. Digital copies of all paper submittals above shall be provided in pdf or Microsoft Word format for submittal to the COUNTY. 4.15 Quantities The CONSULTANT shall develop accurate quantities and the supporting documentation, including construction days when required. 4.16 Cost Estimate The CONSULTANT shall provide the Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost at each submittal phase. The Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost shall be updated and adjusted at each submittal to be maintained up to and including final bid document submittal. 4.17 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions The CONSULTANT shall provide Technical Special Provisions for all items of work not covered by the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and recurring special provisions. Standard Specifications, recurring special provisions and supplemental specifications should not be modified unless necessary to control project specific requirements. The CONSULTANT shall justify all modifications to other sections to the COUNTY and to be included in the project's specifications package as Technical Special Provisions. The Technical Special Provisions shall describe work, materials, equipment, and specific requirements, method of measurement and basis of payment. These provisions shall be submitted Page 1183 of 5277 electronically (PDF’s). 4.18 Other Roadway Analyses This scope item is considered an Additional/Optional Service if requested by the COUNTY. Fees for this item are not included in the negotiated contract fees. If this item is determined necessary and is requested by the COUNTY, scope and fee will be negotiated at that time and will be implemented via Change Order. When applicable, the staff hourly rates established in the contract shall be utilized for fee determination. 4.19 Field Reviews Field reviews will be conducted upon completion of COUNTY and Independent Peer Reviewer reviews of plans submitted by the CONSULTANT for each submittal period. The anticipated format for these meetings will be an in-office review of COUNTY comments in the morning and may be followed by an afternoon field visit if there are areas of concern at the project site. This item also includes all trips required to obtain necessary data for all elements of the roadway analysis identified in this scope of work. 4.20 Monitor Existing Structures The CONSULTANT shall perform field observations to visually identify existing structures within the project limits which may require settlement, vibration or groundwater monitoring by the contractor during construction in accordance with FDM Chapter 117. The CONSULTANT shall identify the necessary pay items to be included in the bid documents to monitor existing structures. Optional Services (may be negotiated at a later date if needed): The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with and assist the geotechnical engineer and/or structural engineer to develop mitigation strategies (when applicable). 4.21 Technical Meetings Includes meetings with the COUNTY or other Agency staff, between disciplines and CONSULTANTS, such as access management meetings, pavement design meetings, progress review meetings (phase review), and miscellaneous meetings necessary for all elements of the roadway analysis identified in this scope of work. 4.22 Quality Assurance/Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of all surveys, designs, drawings, specifications, and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. 4.23 Independent Peer Review See Section 3.0. 4.24 Supervision Includes all efforts required to supervise all technical design activities. 4.25 Coordination Includes all efforts to coordinate all elements of the roadway analysis to produce a final set of construction documents. 5 ROADWAY PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare Roadway, TTCP, Utility Adjustment Sheets, plan sheets, notes, and details as shown in the FDM Summary of Phase Submittals Table 301.2.2. The plans shall include the following sheets necessary to convey the intent and scope of the project for the purposes of construction. Page 1184 of 5277 5.1 Key Sheet 5.2 Typical Section Sheets 5.2.1 Typical Sections 5.2.2 Typical Section Details 5.3 General Notes/Pay Item Notes 5.4 Project Layout 5.5 Plan/Profile Sheet 5.6 Profile Sheet 5.7 Plan Sheet 5.8 Special Profile 5.9 Back-of-Sidewalk Profile Sheet 5.10 Interchange Layout Sheet 5.11 Ramp Terminal Details (Plan View) 5.12 Intersection Layout Details 5.13 Special Details 5.14 Cross-Section Pattern Sheets 5.15 Roadway Soil Survey Sheets 5.16 Cross Sections 5.17 Temporary Traffic Control Plan Sheets 5.18 Temporary Traffic Control Cross Section Sheets 5.19 Temporary Traffic Control Detail Sheets 5.20 Utility Adjustment Sheets 5.21 Selective Clearing and Grubbing Sheets 5.21.1 Selective Clearing and Grubbing 5.21.2 Selective Clearing and Grubbing Details 5.22 Tree Disposition Plan Sheets 5.22.1 Tree Disposition Plan Sheets 5.22.2 Tree Disposition Plan Tables and Schedules 5.23 Project Control Sheets (furnished by Surveyor) 5.24 Environmental Detail Sheets – (where applicable) Preparation of detail sheets for potential environmental issues such as, underground fuel tanks and monitoring wells, septic tanks within the proposed right of way. All piping and pumps in association with the above referenced issues shall also be located and identified by the survey. The CONSULTANT shall relay to the COUNTY any findings of contaminated soil, monitoring wells, or any features (particularly springs or sinks) relating to contamination or hazardous material. Coordination with Permits/Environmental staff and preparing Dredge & Fill Detail sheets where applicable. 5.25 Utility Verification Sheets (SUE Data) 5.26 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 5.27 Supervision 6a DRAINAGE ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Drainage Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for designing a drainage and stormwater management system. All design work shall comply with the requirements of the appropriate regulatory agencies and the FDOT Drainage Manual. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate fully with the appropriate permitting agencies and the COUNTY staff. All activities and submittals should be coordinated through the COUNTY Project Manager. The work will include the engineering analyses for any or all of the following: 6a.1 Drainage Map Hydrology Create a (pre- and/or post-condition) working drainage basin map to be used in defining the system hydrology. This map Page 1185 of 5277 shall incorporate drainage basin boundaries, existing survey and/or LiDAR and field observations, as necessary, to define the system. Basin delineations shall also include any existing collection systems in a logical manner to aid in the development of the hydraulic model. Include coordination hours needed to convey drainage hydrologic features onto produced drainage maps. 6a.2 Base Clearance Calculations Analyze, determine, and document high water elevations per basin which will be used to set roadway profile grade and roadway materials. Determine surface water elevations at cross drains, floodplains, outfalls and adjacent stormwater ponds. Determine groundwater elevations at intervals between the above-mentioned surface waters. Document findings in a Base Clearance Report. 6a.3 Pond Siting Analysis and Report Evaluate pond sites using a preliminary hydrologic analysis. Document the results and coordination for all the project's pond site analyses. The Drainage Manual provides specific documentation requirements. 6a.4 Design of Cross Drains Analyze the hydraulic design and performance of cross drains. Check existing cross drains to determine if they are structurally sound and can be extended. Document the design as required. Determine and provide flood data as required. 6a.5 Design of Ditches Design roadway conveyance and outfall ditches. This task includes capacity calculations, longitudinal grade adjustments, flow changes, additional adjustments for ditch convergences, selection of suitable channel lining, design of side drain pipes, and documentation. (Design of linear stormwater management facilities in separate task.) 6a.6 Design of Stormwater Management Facility (Offsite or Infield Pond) Design stormwater management facilities to meet requirements for stormwater quality treatment, attenuation and aesthetics. Develop proposed pond layout (contributing drainage basin, shape, contours, slopes, volumes, tie-ins, aesthetics, etc.), perform routing, pollutant/nutrient loading calculations, recovery calculations, design the outlet control structure and buoyancy calculations for pond liners when necessary. 6a.7 Design of Stormwater Management Facility (Roadside Treatment Swales and Linear Ponds) Design stormwater management facilities to meet requirements for stormwater quality treatment, attenuation and aesthetics. Develop proposed pond layout (contributing drainage basin, shape, contours, slopes, volumes, tie-ins, aesthetics, etc.), perform routing, pollutant/nutrient loading calculations, recovery calculations and design the outlet control structure. 6a.8 Design of Floodplain Compensation Determine floodplain encroachments, coordinate with regulatory agencies, and develop proposed compensation area layout (shape, contours, slopes, volumes, etc.). Document the design following the requirements of the regulatory agency. 6a.9 Design of Storm Drains Delineate contributing drainage areas, determine runoff, inlet locations, and spread. Calculate hydraulic losses (friction, utility conflict and, if necessary, minor losses). Determine design tailwater and, if necessary, outlet scour protection. 6a.10 Optional Culvert Material Determine acceptable options for pipe materials using the Culvert Service Life Estimator. Page 1186 of 5277 6a.11 French Drain Systems Design French Drain Systems to provide stormwater treatment and attenuation. Identify location for percolation tests and review these, determine the size and length of French Drains, design the control structure/weir, and model the system of inlets, conveyances, French Drains, and other outfalls using a routing program. 6a.11.1 Existing French Drain Systems Include this task if French Drains are proposed and the existing systems must be analyzed for a pre- versus post comparison of the peak stages and/or discharges. 6a.12 Drainage Wells Design the discharge into deep wells to comply with regulatory requirements. Identify the location of the well, design the control structure/weir, and model the system using a routing program. 6a.13 Drainage Design Documentation Report Compile drainage design documentation into report format. Include documentation for all the drainage design tasks and associated meetings and decisions, except for stand-alone reports, such as the Pond Siting Analysis Report and Bridge Hydraulics Report. 6a.14 Bridge Hydraulic Report Calculate hydrology, hydraulics, deck drainage, scour, and appropriate counter measures. Prepare report and the information for the Bridge Hydraulics Recommendation Sheet. 6a.15 Temporary Drainage Analysis Evaluate and address drainage to adequately drain the road and maintain existing offsite drainage during all construction phases. Provide documentation. 6a.16 Drainage Quantities for EQ Report The CONSULTANT shall determine drainage pay items and quantities and the supporting documentation. 6a.17 Cost Estimate Prepare cost estimates for the drainage components, except bridges and earthwork for stormwater management and flood compensation sites. 6a.18 Technical Special Provisions / Modified Special Provisions 6a.19 Hydroplaning Analysis Perform a hydroplaning analysis to assist in the determination of the appropriate roadway geometry for all necessary locations (both typical sections and critical cross sections) as needed. See the FDOT Hydroplaning Guidance and FDOT Design Manual (FDM) Chapters 210 and 211 for more information. 6a.20 Existing Permit Analysis Data gathering including desktop analysis of local, state and federal Drainage permits. 6a.21 Other Drainage Analysis Includes all efforts for a drainage task not covered by an existing defined task. Page 1187 of 5277 6a.22 Noise Barrier Evaluation Evaluate the capacity of drainage openings in noise barriers and locate them to ensure flows are accommodated. 6a.23 Erosion Control Plan Includes analysis and design of the Erosion Control Plan. Includes creating the design file. 6a.24 Field Reviews 6a.25 Technical Meetings Meetings with COUNTY staff, regulatory agencies, local governments such as meetings with District Drainage Engineer, the Water Management District, FDEP, etc. 6a.26 Environmental Look-Around Meetings Convene a meeting with COUNTY staff, regulatory agencies, local governments and other stakeholders to explore watershed wide stormwater needs and alternative permitting approaches. 6a.27 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 6a.28 Independent Peer Review 6a.29 Supervision 6a.30 Coordination 6b DRAINAGE PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare Drainage plan sheets, notes, and details. The plans shall include the following sheets necessary to convey the intent and scope of the project for the purposes of construction. 6b.1 Drainage Map (Including Interchanges) 6b.2 Bridge Hydraulics Recommendation Sheets 6b.3 Drainage Structures 6b.4 Lateral Ditch Plan/Profile & Cross Sections 6b.5 Retention/Detention/Floodplain Compensation Pond Details & Cross Sections 6b.6 Erosion Control Plan 6b.7 SWPPP 6b.8 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 6b.9 Supervision 7 UTILITIES The CONSULTANT shall identify utility facilities and secure agreements, utility work schedules, and plans from the Utility Agency Owners (UAO) ensuring all conflicts that exist between utility facilities and the COUNTY’s construction project are addressed. Page 1188 of 5277 The CONSULTANT shall follow FDOT and COUNTY standards, policies, procedures, and design criteria. COUNTY standards are located at: http://www.colliergov.net/your-government/divisions-s-z/water/utilities-standards-manual. 7.1 Utility Kickoff Meeting Before any contact with the UAO(s), the CONSULTANT shall meet with the COUNTY Transportation Engineering Division and Public Utilities Department to receive guidance, as may be required, to assure that all necessary coordination will be accomplished in accordance with COUNTY procedures. CONSULTANT shall bring a copy of the design project work schedule reflecting utility activities. The CONSULTANT shall be prepared to discuss the project’s applied utility schedule logic and current UAO contact information. 7.2 Identify Existing Utility Agency Owner(s) The CONSULTANT shall identify all Utility Agency Owners (UAOs) in the corridor and within and adjacent to the project limits that may be impacted by the project. Identification shall include the updates UAO contact information. The CONSULTANT shall contact Sunshine 811, perform a field visit, and review prior COUNTY utility permits, reports, existing plans, and surveys provided. 7.3 Make Utility Contacts First Contact: The CONSULTANT shall send emails and electronic (.pdf) sets of plans to each utility, to the utility office, and to the COUNTY Offices as required by the Department. Includes contact by phone for meeting coordination. Request type, size, location, easements, and cost for relocation if reimbursement is claimed. Request the voltage level for power lines in the project area. Send UAO requests for reimbursement to COUNTY for a legal opinion. Include the meeting schedule (if applicable) and the design schedule. Include typical meeting agenda. When scheduling a meeting, the CONSULTANT shall give 4 weeks advance notice. Second Contact: At a minimum of 4 weeks prior to the meeting, the CONSULTANT shall send complete sets of Phase II plans and the utility conflict information (when applicable and in the format requested by the COUNTY) to each UAO having facilities located within the project limits, and email one set to the COUNTY Offices as required by the Department. Third Contact: Identify agreements and assemble packages. The CONSULTANT shall send agreements, letters, the utility conflict information (when applicable and in the format requested by the COUNTY) and an electronic set of plans to the UAO(s) including all component sets, to the utility office and to construction and maintenance if required. Include the design schedule. Not all projects will have all contacts as described above. 7.4 Exception Processing The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for transmitting/coordinating the appropriate design reports including, but not limited to, the Resurfacing, Restoration and Rehabilitation (RRR) report, Preliminary Engineering Report, Project Scope and/or the Concept Report (if applicable) to each UAO to identify any condition that may require a Design Alternative. The CONSULTANT shall identify and communicate to the UAO any facilities in conflict with their location or project schedule. The CONSULTANT shall assist with the processing of design alternative involving Utilities with the UAO and the COUNTY. Assist with processing per the UAM. 7.5 Preliminary Utility Meeting The CONSULTANT shall schedule (time and place), notify participants, and conduct a preliminary utility meeting with all UAO(s) having facilities located within the project limits for the purpose of presenting the project, reviewing the current design schedule, evaluating the utility information collected, provide follow-up information on compensable property rights from the COUNTY Transportation ROW office, discuss the utility work by highway contractor option with each utility, and discuss any future design issues that may impact utilities. This is also an opportunity for the UAO(s) to present proposed facilities. The CONSULTANT shall keep accurate minutes and distribute a copy to all attendees. 7.6 Individual/Field Meetings The CONSULTANT shall meet with each UAO as necessary, separately or together, throughout the project design duration Page 1189 of 5277 to provide guidance in the interpretation of plans, review changes to the plans and schedules, standard or selective clearing and grubbing work, and assist in the development of the UAO(s) marked/RGB plans and work schedules. The CONSULTANT is responsible for motivating the UAO to complete and return the necessary documents after each Utility Contact or Meeting. 7.7 Collect and Review Plans and Data from UAO(s) The CONSULTANT shall review utility marked plans and data individually as they are received for content. Ensure information from the UAO (utility type, material, and size) is sent to the designer for inclusion in the plans. Forward all requests for utility reimbursement and supporting documentation to the COUNTY. 7.8 Subordination of Easements Coordination The CONSULTANT, if requested by the COUNTY, shall transmit to and secure from the UAO the executed subordination agreements prepared by the appropriate COUNTY office. 7.9 Utility Design Meeting The CONSULTANT shall schedule (time and place), notify participants, and conduct a Utility meeting with all affected UAO(s). The CONSULTANT shall be prepared to discuss impacts to existing trees/vegetation and proposed landscape, drainage, traffic signalization, temporary traffic control plans (TTCP) (construction phasing), review the current design schedule and letting date, evaluate the utility information collected, provide follow-up information on compensable property rights from COUNTY Legal Office, discuss with each UAO the utility work by highway contractor option, discuss any future design issues that may impact utilities, etc., to the extent that they may have an effect on existing or proposed utility facilities with particular emphasis on drainage and TTCP with each UAO. The intent of this meeting shall be to assist the UAOs in identifying and resolving conflicts between utilities and proposed construction before completion of the plans, including utility adjustment details. Also, to work with the UAOs to recommend potential resolutions between known utility conflicts with proposed construction plans as may be deemed practical by the UAO. The CONSULTANT shall keep accurate minutes of all meetings and distribute a copy to all attendees within 3 days. See Task 4.5 (Horizontal/Vertical Master Design File) and Task 4.9 (Cross Section Design Files) for utility conflict location identification and adjustments. 7.10 Review Utility Markups & Work Schedules and Processing of Schedules & Agreements The CONSULTANT shall review utility marked-up plans and work schedules as they are received for content and coordinate review with the designer. Send color markups and schedules to the appropriate COUNTY office(s) such as survey, geotechnical, drainage, structures, lighting, roadway, signals, utilities, landscape architecture, municipalities, maintaining agency, and COUNTY Traffic Operations for review and comment. Coordinate with the COUNTY Project Manager for execution. Distribute Executed Final Documents. Prepare Work Order for UAO(s). The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the Collier County PUD the programming of necessary Work Program funds. 7.11 Utility Coordination/Follow-up The CONSULTANT shall provide utility coordination and follow-up. This includes follow- up, interpreting plans, and assisting the UAOs with completion of their work schedules and agreements. Includes phone calls, face-to-face meetings, etc., to motivate and ensure the UAO(s) complete and return the required documents in accordance with the project schedule. Ensure the resolution of all identified conflicts. The CONSULTANT shall keep accurate minutes of all meetings and distribute a copy to all attendees. This task can be applied to all phases of the project. 7.12 Utility Constructability Review The CONSULTANT shall review utility schedules against construction contract time, and phasing for compatibility. Coordinate with and obtain written concurrence from the construction office. See Task 4.5 (Horizontal/Vertical Master Design File) and Task 4.8 (Cross Section Design Files) for utility conflict identification and adjustments. Page 1190 of 5277 7.13 Additional Utility Services The CONSULTANT shall provide additional utility services. The CONSULTANT shall, via soft-dig, potholing, or other non-destructive method, physically obtain the horizontal and vertical location, size, type, material, and condition, of all underground utilities within and surrounding all proposed foundations for signal poles, light poles, retaining walls, piles, piers, culverts, tunnels, air release valves or other critical locations where foundation construction is proposed, or as directed by the COUNTY’S Construction Project Manager. Refer to Section 27.10 for SUE services.  County Utility Analysis – The CONSULTANT shall review the existing Collier County utilities within the project area and evaluate potential impacts cause by the proposed project improvements. The CONSULTANT will obtain County GIS data to assist with evaluating water, wastewater, and irrigation quality assets that will conflict with the proposed road work. The CONSULTANT will survey above-ground utility infrastructure. The CONSULTANT shall perform an SUE investigation at “Tie-in” points and said impacted utilities should be documented per a conflict matrix. For the 0 to 60% design phase, the CONSULTANT will be responsible for identifying all those utilities impacted by the roadway improvements and determining whether additional right-of-way will be required for their relocation.  County Utility Design – After creating the conflict matrix, the CONSULTANT will be responsible for Utility Relocation Designs. The CONSULTANT will not be responsible for any Utility Upgrade Designs for the COUNTY utilities. Utility upgrade design will be considered an Additional Service. 7.14 Processing Utility Work by Highway Contractor (UWHC) This includes coordinating utility design efforts between the COUNTY and the UAO(s). The CONSULTANT shall conduct additional coordination meetings, prepare and process the agreements, review tabulation of quantities, perform UWHC constructability and biddability review, review pay items, cost estimates , and Technical Special Provisions (TSP) or Modified Special Provision (MSP) prepared by the UAO. This does not include the utility design effort. This item is not usually included in the scope at the time of negotiation. 7.15 Contract Plans to UAO(s) If requested by the COUNTY, the CONSULTANT shall transmit the contract plans as processed for letting to the UAO(s). Transmittals to UAO(s) via electronic delivery or another agreeable format. 7.16 Certification/Close-Out This includes hours for transmitting utility files to the COUNTY and preparation of the Utility Certification Letter. The CONSULTANT shall certify to the COUNTY Project Manager the following: All utility negotiations (Full execution of each agreement, approved Utility Work Schedules, Technical Special Provisions or Modified Special Provisions written, etc.) have been completed with arrangements made for utility work to be undertaken and completed as required for proper coordination with the physical construction schedule. OR An on-site inspection was made, and no utility work will be involved. OR Plans were sent to the Utility Companies/Agencies; no utility work is required. OR A No Response letter on COUNTY letter, delivered to the UAO via certified mail, return receipt requested, documenting all failed attempts to obtain RGBs, UWS or No Conflict letter from any non-responsive UAO. 7.17 Other Utilities This scope item is considered an Additional/Optional Service if requested by the COUNTY. Fees for this item are not included in the negotiated contract fees. If this item is determined necessary and is requested by the COUNTY, scope and fee will be negotiated at the time and will be implemented via Change Order or Contract Amendment. If applicable, the staff hourly rates established in the contract shall be utilized for fee determination. Page 1191 of 5277 8 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS and ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCES The CONSULTANT shall notify the COUNTY Project Manager, Environmental Permit Coordinator, and other appropriate COUNTY personnel in advance of all scheduled meetings with the regulatory agencies to allow a COUNTY representative to attend. The CONSULTANT shall copy in the Project Manager and the Environmental Permit Coordinator on all permit related correspondence and meetings. The CONSULTANT shall use current regulatory guidelines and policies for all permits required as identified in Section 2.4. 8.1 Preliminary Project Research The CONSULTANT shall perform preliminary project research and shall be responsible for regulatory agency coordination to assure that design efforts are properly directed toward permit requirements. The research shall include but should not be limited to a review of the project’s PD&E documents including the Environmental Document, Natural Resources Evaluation Report, and Cultural Resources Assessment Survey Report. The CONSULTANT shall research any existing easements or other restrictions that may exist both within or adjacent to the proposed project boundary. Project research may include but should not be limited to review of available: federal, state, and local permit files and databases; and local government information including COUNTY and property appraiser data. The CONSULTANT shall determine if any Sovereign Submerged Lands easements need to be modified or acquired. Any applicable information will be shown on the plans as appropriate. 8.2 Field Work 8.2.1 Pond Site Alternatives: The CONSULTANT shall review alternative pond sites as directed by the COUNTY and information shall be included in the Pond Siting Report. 8.2.2 Establish Wetland Jurisdictional Lines and Assessments: The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for, but not limited to, the following activities:  Determine landward extent of wetlands and other surface waters as detailed in Rule Chapter 62-340, F.A.C., as ratified in Section 373.4211, F.S..; United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y-87- 1); Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (ERD/EL TR-10-20).  Collect all data and information necessary to determine the jurisdictional boundaries of wetlands and other surface waters as defined by the rules or regulations of each permitting agency processing a COUNTY permit application for the project.  Set seasonal high-water levels in adjacent wetlands with biological indicators  Obtain a jurisdictional determination as defined by the rules or regulations of each permitting agency processing a COUNTY permit application for the project.  Prepare aerial maps showing the jurisdictional boundaries of wetlands and other surface waters. Aerial maps shall be reproducible, of a scale of 1"=400'or more detailed and be recent photography. The maps shall show the jurisdictional boundaries of each agency. Photocopies of aerials are not acceptable. When necessary, a wetland specific survey will be prepared by a registered professional surveyor and mapper. All surveyed jurisdictional boundaries are to be tied to the project's baseline of survey.  Prepare a written assessment of the current condition and functional value of the wetlands and other surface waters. Prepare data in tabular form which includes the ID number for each wetland (and other surface water, if necessary) impacted, size of wetland to be impacted, type of impact, and identify any wetland (by ID number and size) within the project limits that will not be impacted by the project.  Prepare appropriate agency forms to obtain required permits. Forms may include but are not limited to the USACE "Wetland Determination Data Form – Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region"; the USACE "Request for Corps Jurisdictional Determination"; Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method forms and/or project specific data forms. Page 1192 of 5277 8.2.3 Species Surveys: The CONSULTANT shall conduct wildlife surveys as defined by rules or regulations of any permitting agency, or commenting agency that is processing a COUNTY permit. Species specific survey included for gopher tortoise burrows, fox squirrel nests, Florida bonneted bat (roost and acoustic survey). No species-specific survey for red-cockaded woodpecker and Florida scrub-jay. The CONSULTANT shall conduct a field review of the project site and document existing conditions with regard to habitats and potential presence of listed species. CONSULTANT will prepare the required supplemental environmental technical memorandum necessary to facilitate FDOT review and support for a Type 2, Categorical Exclusion Re-evaluation to meet National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance. CONSULTANT will prepare the required documentation to support the Type 2 CE Re-evaluation and will submit the required information for the Type 2 CE Re-evaluation to the COUNTY and FDOT to achieve the required Environmental Certification required for the LAP Agreement. The above scope and corresponding fees include consultation with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). The CONSULTANT is to coordinate with the SFWMD and any other regulatory agencies having jurisdiction to assure that design efforts are properly directed toward permit requirements. The CONSULTANT will prepare a complete permit package necessary to construct the project, including site and system design information required by and acceptable to the District and all other regulatory agencies. The CONSULTANT will professionally endorse the permit package(s) for District permitting and any regulatory agency exercising jurisdiction. The CONSULTANT is responsible for permit package submittal, agency coordination and for all the information necessary to secure permits from these regulatory agencies. 8.3 Agency Verification of Wetland Data The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for verification of wetland and other surface water data identified in Section 8.2 and coordinating regulatory agency field reviews, including finalization of assessments and jurisdictional determinations with applicable agencies. 8.4 Complete and Submit All Required Permit Applications The CONSULTANT shall collect all the data and information necessary to prepare the permit applications and obtain the environmental permits required to construct the project as identified in the Project Description and as described in 8.4.1, 8.4.2, and 8.12 (Other Permits). The CONSULTANT shall prepare each permit application in accordance with the rules and/or regulations of the regulatory agency responsible for issuing a specific permit and/or authorization to perform work. The permit application packages must be approved by the COUNTY and FDOT prior to submittal to regulatory agencies. The CONSULTANT will submit all permit applications, as directed by the COUNTY. The COUNTY will be responsible for payment of all permit fees. 8.4.1 Complete and Submit all Required Wetland Permit Applications: The CONSULTANT shall prepare, complete, and submit required wetland permit (i.e., ERP, Section 404) application packages to the appropriate regulatory agencies. This includes, but is not limited to, applications submitted to WMDs and/or DEP. The application package may include but is not limited to attachments (i.e., project location map, aerials, affidavit of ownership, pictures, additional technical analysis, etc.), a cover letter with project description as well as completion of applicable agency forms. The CONSULTANT shall prepare and respond to agency Requests for Additional Information (RAIs), including necessary revisions to the application package. All responses and completed application packages must be approved by the COUNTY prior to submittal to the regulatory agencies. Geotechnical permitting should also be prepared, submitted, and obtained. Page 1193 of 5277 8.4.2 Complete and Submit all Required Species Permit Applications: The CONSULTANT shall prepare, complete, and submit required species permit applications to the appropriate agencies. This includes federal and state protected species permit application packages as required. The work includes completion of application package (i.e., project location map, aerials, affidavit of ownership, pictures, additional technical analysis, etc.), and cover letter with project description as well as completion of applicable forms. The CONSULTANT shall respond to agency RAIs, including necessary revisions to the application package. All responses and completed applications must be approved by the COUNTY prior to submittal to the regulatory agency. Permit applications limited to FWC 10 or fewer gopher tortoise relocation permit and modification of existing USFWS Biological Opinion. 8.5 Coordinate and Review Dredge and Fill Sketches The CONSULTANT shall review Dredge and Fill Detail sheets to ensure information on the sketch(es) meet the requirements of the regulatory agencies and are appropriate for environmental permit application submittal and acquisition. The CONSULTANT will also provide environmental data/information as needed to support the preparation of the Dredge and Fill sketches. 8.6 Complete and Submit Documentation for Coordination and/or USCG Bridge Permit Application The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the level of effort needed for the USCG authorization in accordance with the regulatory agency requirements. 8.6.1 Prepare and submit required documents for USCG Coordination The CONSULTANT shall complete appropriate documentation required for the USCG to determine the navigability of the waterway and whether a USCG permit will be required. 8.6.2 Complete and submit USCG Bridge Permit Application The CONSULTANT shall prepare and submit required USCG bridge permit application. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for acquiring the USCG approval. 8.7 Prepare Water Management District or Local Water Control District Right of Way Occupancy Permit Application The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the preparation of the ROW Occupancy permit application in accordance with the regulatory agency requirements. 8.8 Prepare Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) Permit Application The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the preparation of the CCCL permit application and acquire the final "Notice to Proceed" authorization from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Legal advertisements shall be published one time in a newspaper that meets the notification requirements of the FDEP. 8.9 Prepare USACE Section 408 Application to Alter a Civil Works Project The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the preparation of Section 408 (33 USC 408) application and obtaining Section 408 permission. 8.10 Compensatory Mitigation Plan Prior to the development of mitigation alternatives, the CONSULTANT shall meet with the Project Manager to determine the COUNTY’s policies in proposing mitigation. The CONSULTANT will be directed by the COUNTY to investigate the mitigation options that meet federal and state requirements in accordance with section 373.4137, F.S. Below is the only mitigation options:  Purchase of mitigation credits from a mitigation bank Page 1194 of 5277  Payment to DEP/WMD for mitigation services  Monetary participation in offsite regional mitigation plans  Creation/restoration of wetlands In the event that physical creation or restoration is the only feasible alternative to offset wetland impacts, the CONSULTANT shall collect all of the data and information necessary to prepare mitigation plans acceptable to all permitting agencies and commenting agencies who are processing or reviewing a permit application for a COUNTY project. Prior to selection of a final creation/restoration mitigation site, the CONSULTANT will provide the following services in the development of a mitigation plan:  Preliminary jurisdictional determination for each proposed site  Selection of alternative sites  Coordination of alternative sites with the COUNTY/all environmental agencies  Written narrative listing potential sites with justifications for both recommended and non- recommended sites. 8.11 Mitigation Coordination and Meetings The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with COUNTY personnel prior to approaching any environmental permitting or commenting agencies. Once a mitigation plan has been reviewed and approved by the COUNTY, the CONSULTANT will be responsible for coordinating the proposed mitigation plan with the environmental agencies. The CONSULTANT will provide mitigation information needed to update the COUNTY Project Manager. 8.12 Regulatory Agency Support The CONSULTANT shall provide regulatory agency support which may include but is not limited to preparing: a Statement of Findings or Memorandum for the Record; Public Notice; Findings of Fact; and Biological Opinion. 8.13 Technical Support to the DEPARTMENT for Environmental Clearances and Re-evaluations (use when CONSULTANT provides technical support only) The CONSULTANT shall provide engineering and environmental support for the COUNTY to obtain environmental clearances for all changes to the project after the PD&E study was approved. These changes include but are not limited to pond or mitigation sites identified, land use or environmental changes, and major design changes. 8.13.1 NEPA or SEIR Re-evaluation During the development of the final design plans, the CONSULTANT shall be responsible for coordinating with the COUNTY Project Manager to provide necessary engineering information required in the preparation of the re-evaluation by the COUNTY. The preparation of environmental re-evaluations includes those as listed in Part 1, Chapter 13 of the FDOT’s PD&E Manual: Right of Way, Design Change, and Construction Advertisement. Re-evaluations will be completed in accordance with Part 1, Chapter 13 of the PD&E Manual. The CONSULTANT shall provide information to update the Project Commitment Record for incorporation into the re-evaluation. It is the responsibility of the CONSULTANT to provide the COUNTY Project Manager with engineering information on major design changes including changes in typical section, roadway alignment, pond site selection, right of way requirements, bridge to box culvert, drainage, and traffic volumes that may affect noise models. 8.13.2 Archaeological and Historical Resources The CONSULTANT shall provide necessary technical information to the COUNTY Project Manager to analyze the impacts to all cultural and historical resources due to changes in the project in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 8 of the PD&E Manual. Page 1195 of 5277 8.13.3 Wetland Impact Analysis The CONSULTANT shall provide necessary technical information to the COUNTY Project Manager to analyze the impacts to wetlands and other surface waters in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 9 of the PD&E Manual due to changes in the project. 8.13.4 Essential Fish Habitat Impact Analysis The CONSULTANT shall provide necessary technical information to the COUNTY Project Manager to analyze the impacts to essential fish habitat in accordance Part 2, Chapter 17 of the PD&E Manual due to changes in the project. 8.13.5 Protected Species and Habitat Impact Analysis The CONSULTANT shall provide necessary technical information to the COUNTY Project Manager to analyze the impacts to all protected species and habitat in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 16 of the PD&E Manual due to changes in the project. The CONSULTANT shall perform the necessary analysis to complete agency consultation in accordance with Section 7 or Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act. 8.14 Contamination Impact Analysis The CONSULTANT shall prepare Contamination Screening Evaluation for the project limits including stormwater ponds and floodplain compensation sites as described in Part 2, Chapter 20, of the PD&E Manual. The appropriate level of analysis and deliverable type will be approved by the COUNTY Project Manager and District Contamination Impact Coordinator. The draft Level 1 Contamination Screening Evaluation document shall be submitted to the COUNTY Project Manager for review and final approval. The CONSULTANT shall include an evaluation of any new contamination impacts due to changes to the project from the PD&E design concept, if applicable, and any new discharges or new potential contamination impacts not evaluated in any previously completed Contamination Screening Evaluation. The project impacts, conclusions and recommendations, figures, tables, and appendices will be provided in a Level I Contamination Screening Evaluation Report. The CONSULTANT shall provide Level II assessment services. If contamination is identified within the limits of construction, the CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY Project Manager to properly mark identified contamination areas in the plans and develop specifications as appropriate. 8.14.1 NEPA or SEIR Re-evaluation During the development of the final design plans, the CONSULTANT shall be responsible for collecting the data and preparing a re-evaluation in accordance with Part 1, Chapter 13 of the PD&E Manual. 8.14.2 Archaeological and Historical Resources The CONSULTANT shall collect data necessary to completely analyze the impacts, due to changes in the project or project area, to all cultural and historic resources, and prepare a Cultural Resource Assessment Survey Report, in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 8 of the PD&E Manual. 8.14.3 Wetland Impact Analysis The CONSULTANT shall analyze the impacts to wetlands due to changes to the project and complete the wetlands section of a Natural Resources Evaluation Report, in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 9 of the PD&E Manual. 8.14.4 Essential Fish Habitat Impact Analysis The CONSULTANT shall analyze the impacts to essential fish habitat due to changes to the project and complete the Essential Fish Habitat section of a Natural Resources Evaluation Report, in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 17 of the PD&E Manual. Page 1196 of 5277 8.14.5 Protected Species and Habitat Impact Analysis The CONSULTANT shall collect data necessary to prepare the protected species and habitat section of the Natural Resources Evaluation Report and analyze the impacts to protected species and habitat by the changes to the project, in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 16 of the PD&E Manual. The CONSULTANT shall perform the necessary analysis to complete agency consultation in accordance with Section 7 or Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act. 8.15 Other Environmental Permits 8.16 Asbestos Survey The COUNTY will provide asbestos and metal-based coatings survey services. If asbestos or metal based coatings above threshold levels are found on the bridge(s), the CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY Project Manager to obtain plan notes, general notes, specifications, pay item notes, and Operation and Maintenance (O&M) plan for any asbestos to remain in place. 8.17 Technical Meetings 8.18 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 8.19 Supervision 8.20 Coordination 9 STRUCTURES - SUMMARY AND MISCELLANEOUS TASKS AND DRAWINGS The CONSULTANT shall analyze, design, and develop contract documents for all structures in accordance with applicable provisions as defined in Section 2.19, Provisions for Work. Individual tasks identified in Sections 9 through 18 are defined in the Staff Hour Estimation Handbook and within the provision defined in Section 2. 20, Provisions for Work. Contract documents shall display economical solutions for the given conditions. The CONSULTANT shall provide Design Documentation to the COUNTY with each submittal consisting of structural design calculations and other supporting documentation developed during the development of the plans. The design calculations submitted shall adequately address the complete design of all structural elements. These calculations shall be neatly and logically presented on digital media or, at the COUNTY'S request, on 8 ½"x11" paper and all sheets shall be numbered. The final design calculations shall be signed and sealed by a Florida licensed professional engineer. A cover sheet indexing the contents of the calculations shall be included and the engineer shall sign and seal that sheet. All computer programs and parameters used in the design calculations shall include sufficient backup information to facilitate the review task. 9.1 Key Sheet and Index of Drawings 9.2 Project Layout 9.3 General Notes and Bid Item Notes 9.4 Miscellaneous Common Details 9.5 Incorporate Report of Core Borings 9.6 Standard Plans- Bridges 9.7 Existing Bridge Plans 9.8 Structures Quantities for EQ Report 9.9 Cost Estimate 9.10 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions 9.11 Field Reviews 9.12 Technical Meetings 9.13 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 9.14 Independent Peer Review 9.15 Supervision 9.16 Coordination Page 1197 of 5277 10 STRUCTURES - BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT REPORT – N/A 11 STRUCTURES - TEMPORARY BRIDGE – N/A 12 STRUCTURES - SHORT SPAN CONCRETE BRIDGE – N/A 13 STRUCTURES - MEDIUM SPAN CONCRETE BRIDGE – N/A 14 STRUCTURES - STRUCTURAL STEEL BRIDGE – N/A 15 STRUCTURES - SEGMENTAL CONCRETE BRIDGE – N/A 16 STRUCTURES - MOVABLE SPAN – N/A 17 STRUCTURES – RETAINING WALLS General Requirements 17.1 Key Sheet 17.2 Horizontal Wall Geometry Permanent Proprietary Walls 17.3 Vertical Wall Geometry 17.4 Semi-Standard Drawings 17.5 Wall Plan and Elevations (Control Drawings) 17.6 Details Temporary Proprietary Walls 17.7 Vertical Wall Geometry 17.8 Semi-Standard Drawings 17.9 Wall Plan and Elevations (Control Drawings) 17.10 Details Cast-In-Place Retaining Walls 17.11 Design 17.12 Vertical Wall Geometry 17.13 General Notes 17.14 Wall Plan and Elevations (Control Drawings) 17.15 Sections and Details 17.16 Reinforcing Bar List Other Retaining Walls and Bulkheads 17.17 Design 17.18 Vertical Wall Geometry 17.19 General Notes, Tables and Miscellaneous Details 17.20 Wall Plan and Elevations 17.21 Details General Requirements 18 STRUCTURES – MISCELLANEOUS The CONSULTANT shall prepare plans for Miscellaneous Structure(s) as specified in Section 2.5. Concrete Box Culverts 18.1 Concrete Box Culverts 18.2 Concrete Box Culverts Extensions 18.3 Concrete Box Culvert Data Table Plan Sheets 18.4 Concrete Box Culvert Special Details Plan Sheets Page 1198 of 5277 Strain Poles 18.5 Steel Strain Poles 18.6 Concrete Strain Poles 18.7 Strain Pole Data Table Plan Sheets Mast Arms 18.8 Strain Pole Special Details Plan Sheets Mast Arms 18.9 Mast Arms 18.10 Mast Arms Data Table Plan Sheets 18.11 Mast Arms Special Details Plan Sheets Overhead/Cantilever Sign Structure 18.12 Cantilever Sign Structures 18.13 Overhead Span Sign Structures 18.14 Special (Long Span) Overhead Sign Structures 18.15 Monotube Overhead Sign Structure 18.16 Bridge Mounted Signs (Attached to Superstructure) 18.17 Overhead/Cantilever Sign Structures Data Table Plan Sheets 18.18 Overhead/Cantilever Sign Structures Special Details Plan Sheets High Mast Lighting 18.19 Non-Standard High Mast Lighting Structures 18.20 High Mast Lighting Special Details Plan Sheets Noise Barrier Walls (Ground Mount) 18.21 Horizontal Wall Geometry 18.22 Vertical Wall Geometry 18.23 Summary of Quantities – Aesthetic Requirements 18.24 Control Drawings 18.25 Design of Noise Barrier Walls Covered by Standards 18.26 Design of Noise Barrier Walls not Covered by Standards 18.27 Aesthetic Details Special Structures 18.28 Fender System 18.29 Fender System Access 18.30 Special Structures 18.31 Other Structures 18.32 Condition Evaluation of Signal and Sign Structures, and High Mast Light Poles 18.33 Condition Evaluation of Signal and Sign Structures, and High Mast Light Poles (No As built or Design Plans Available) 18.34 Analytical Evaluation of Signal and Sign Structures, and High Mast Light Poles Concrete Box Culverts 18.35 Ancillary Structures Report 19 SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Signing and Pavement Markings Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. 19.1 Traffic Data Analysis The CONSULTANT shall review the approved preliminary engineering report, typical section package, traffic technical memorandum and proposed geometric design alignment to identify proposed sign placements and roadway markings. Perform queue analysis. Page 1199 of 5277 19.2 No Passing Zone Study The CONSULTANT shall perform all effort required for field data collection, and investigation in accordance with the FDOT Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies. The CONSULTANT shall submit the signed and sealed report to the COUNTY for review and approval. 19.3 Signing and Pavement Marking Master Design File The CONSULTANT shall prepare the Signing & Marking Design file to include all necessary design elements and all associated reference files. 19.4 Multi-Post Sign Support Calculations The CONSULTANT shall determine the appropriate column size from the COUNTY’S Multi-Post Sign Program(s). 19.5 Sign Panel Design Analysis Establish sign layout, letter size and series for non-standard signs. 19.6 Sign Lighting/Electrical Calculations The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Lighting/Electrical Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a photometric analysis to be submitted as part of the Lighting Design Analysis Report. An analysis shall be provided for each new and/or modified sign panel which requires lighting. The Consultant shall submit voltage drop calculations and load analysis for each new and/or modified sign panel which requires lighting. 19.7 S&PM Quantities for EQ Report The CONSULTANT shall determine signing and pavement marking pay items and quantities and the supporting documentation. 19.8 Cost Estimate 19.9 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions 19.10 Other Signing and Pavement Marking Analysis 19.11 Field Reviews 19.12 Technical Meetings 19.13 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 19.14 Independent Peer Review 19.15 Supervision 19.16 Coordination 20 SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare a set of Signing and Pavement Marking Plans in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums that includes the following: 20.1 Key Sheet & Signature Sheet 20.2 General Notes/Pay Item Notes 20.3 Project Layout 20.4 Plan Sheet 20.5 Special Details Page 1200 of 5277 20.6 Service Point Details 20.7 Guide Sign Data 20.8 Cross Sections (Sign Installations) 20.9 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 20.10 Special Service Point Details as required 20.11 Special Details 20.12 Interim Standards 20.13 Quality Assurance/Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of traffic design drawings, specifications and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. The CONSULTANT shall provide a Quality Control Plan that describes the procedures to be utilized to verify, independently check, and review all design drawings, specifications and other services prepared as a part of the contract. The CONSULTANT shall describe how the checking and review processes are to be documented to verify that the required procedures were followed. The Quality Control Plan may be one utilized by the CONSULTANT as part of their normal operation or it may be one specifically designed for this project. 20.14 Supervision 21 SIGNALIZATION ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Signalization Analysis Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. 21.1 Traffic Data Collection The CONSULTANT shall perform all efforts required for traffic data collection, including crash reports, 24 hr. machine counts, 8 hr. turning movement counts, 7 day machine counts, and speed & delay studies. 21.2 Traffic Data Analysis The CONSULTANT shall determine signal operation plan, intersection geometry, local signal timings, pre-emption phasing & timings, forecasting traffic, and intersection analysis run. 21.3 Signal Warrant Study 21.4 Systems Timings – N/A The Collier County Traffic Operations will perform the signal timing determination. 21.5 Reference and Master Signalization Design File The CONSULTANT shall prepare the Signalization Design file to include all necessary design elements and all associated reference files. 21.6 Reference and Master Interconnect Communication Design File – N/A 21.7 Overhead Street Name Sign Design The CONSULTANT shall design Signal Mounted Overhead Street Name signs. 21.8 Pole Elevation Analysis 21.9 Traffic Signal Operation Report – N/A 21.10 Signalization Quantities for EQ Report Page 1201 of 5277 The CONSULTANT shall determine signalization pay items and quantities and the supporting documentation. 21.11 Cost Estimate 21.12 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions The CONSULTANT shall meet the latest version of the Collier County Signalization Technical Special Provisions. 21.13 Other Signalization Analysis The CONSULTANT is required to incorporate into the project the following elements: Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Cameras (as necessary) – the specification for these devices can be found on Collier County’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/your-government/divisions-s-z/traffic-operations/traffic-technical-special- provisions. Vehicle Detection (Inductive loops); web address for these specifications is above. Any additional Technical Special Provisions (must be approved by Traffic Operations Engineers). 21.14 Field Reviews The CONSULTANT shall collect information from the maintaining agencies and conduct a field review. The review should include, but is not limited to, the following:  Existing Signal and Pedestrian Phasing  Controller Make, Model, Capabilities and Condition/Age  Condition of Signal Structure(s)  Type of Detection as Compared with Current District Standards  Interconnect Media  Controller Timing Data 21.15 Technical Meetings 21.16 Quality Assurance/Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of traffic design drawings, specifications and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. The CONSULTANT shall provide a Quality Control Plan that describes the procedures to be utilized to verify, independently check, and review all design drawings, specifications and other services prepared as a part of the contract. The CONSULTANT shall describe how the checking and review processes are to be documented to verify that the required procedures were followed. The Quality Control Plan may be one utilized by the CONSULTANT as part of their normal operation, or it may be one specifically designed for this project. 21.17 Independent Peer Review 21.18 Supervision 21.19 Coordination 22 SIGNALIZATION PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare a set of Signalization Plans in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums, which includes the following: Page 1202 of 5277 22.1 Key Sheet 22.2 Signature Sheet 22.3 Tabulation of Quantities 22.4 General Notes/Pay Item Notes 22.5 Signalization Plan Sheets 22.6 Interconnect Plans 22.7 Traffic Monitoring Site 22.8 Guide Sign Data 22.9 Special Details 22.10 Service Point Details 22.11 Mast Arm/Monotube Tabulation Sheet 22.12 Strain Pole Schedule 22.13 TTCP Signal 22.14 Temporary Detection Sheet 22.15 Utility Conflict Sheet 22.16 Interim Standards 22.17 Quality Assurance/Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of traffic design drawings, specifications and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. The CONSULTANT shall provide a Quality Control Plan that describes the procedures to be utilized to verify, independently check, and review all design drawings, specifications and other services prepared as a part of the contract. The CONSULTANT shall describe how the checking and review processes are to be documented to verify that the required procedures were followed. The Quality Control Plan may be one utilized by the CONSULTANT as part of their normal operation, or it may be one specifically designed for this project. 22.18 Supervision 23 LIGHTING ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Lighting Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. 23.1 Lighting Justification Report The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Lighting Justification Report. The report shall be submitted under a separate cover with the Phase I plans submittal, titled Lighting Justification Report. The report shall provide analyses for mainlines, interchanges, and arterial roads and shall include all back-up data such that the report stands on its own. Back up data shall include current ADT's, general crash data average cost from the Florida Highway Safety Improvement Manual, crash details data from the last three years, and preliminary lighting calculations. The report shall address warrants to determine if lighting warrants are met and shall include a benefit-cost analysis to determine if lighting is justified. The report shall include calculations for the night-to-day crash ratio as well as a table summarizing the daytime and the night-time crashes. The report shall follow the procedures outlined in the FDOT Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies (MUTS) manual which utilizes ADT, Three Year Crash Data, night/day crash ratio, percentage of night ADT, etc. 23.2 Lighting Design Analysis Report (LDAR) The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Preliminary Lighting Design Analysis Report in accordance with the requirements of the FDOT Design Manual. The report shall be submitted under a separate cover with the Phase II plans submittal. After approval of the preliminary report, the CONSULTANT shall submit a revised report for each submittal. Page 1203 of 5277 23.3 Voltage Drop Calculations The CONSULTANT shall submit voltage drop calculations showing the equation or equations used along with the number of luminaries per circuit, the length of each circuit, the size conductor or conductors used and their ohm resistance values. The voltage drop incurred on each circuit (total volts and percentage of drop) shall be calculated, and all work necessary to calculate the voltage drop values for each circuit should be presented in such a manner as to be duplicated by the COUNTY. The Voltage Drop Calculations shall be submitted as part of the Lighting Design Analysis Report. 23.4 FDEP Coordination and Report 23.5 Reference and Master Design Files The CONSULTANT shall prepare the Lighting Design file to include all necessary design elements and all associated reference files. 23.6 Temporary Highway Lighting The CONSULTANT shall develop a Temporary Highway Lighting design and, when required, a Temporary Highway Lighting design file. The Temporary Highway Lighting design must account for all phases of the TTCP and includes the analysis, calculations, and placement of luminaires, supports, conductors, conduits, pull boxes, and electrical power service. 23.7 Design Documentation The CONSULTANT shall submit a Design Documentation with each plans submittal under a separate cover and not part of the roadway documentation book. At a minimum, the design documentation shall include:  Phase submittal checklist.  Structural calculations for special conventional pole concrete foundations.  Correspondence with the power company concerning new electrical service. 23.8 Lighting Quantities for EQ Report The CONSULTANT shall determine lighting pay items and quantities and the supporting documentation. 23.9 Cost Estimate 23.10 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions 23.11 Other Lighting Analysis 23.12 Field Reviews The CONSULTANT shall collect information from the maintaining agencies and conduct a field review. The review should include but is not limited to the following:  Existing Lighting Equipment  Load Center, Capabilities and Condition/Age  Condition of Lighting Structure(s)  Verification of horizontal clearances  Verification of breakaway requirements 23.13 Technical Meetings 23.14 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 23.15 Independent Peer Review 23.16 Supervision 23.17 Coordination Page 1204 of 5277 24 LIGHTING PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare a set of Lighting Plans in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. 24.1 Key Sheet & Signature Sheet 24.2 General Notes/Pay Item Notes 24.3 Pole Data, Legend & Criteria 24.4 Project Layout 24.5 Plan Sheets 24.6 Special Details 24.7 Service Point Details 24.8 Temporary Highway Lighting Plan Sheets 24.9 Quality Assurance/Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of traffic design drawings, specifications and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. The CONSULTANT shall provide a Quality Control Plan that describes the procedures to be utilized to verify, independently check, and review all design drawings, specifications and other services prepared as a part of the contract. The CONSULTANT shall describe how the checking and review processes are to be documented to verify that the required procedures were followed. The Quality Control Plan may be one utilized by the CONSULTANT as part of their normal operation or it may be one specifically designed for this project. 24.10 Supervision 25 LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS – N/A 26 LANDSCAPE PLANS – N/A 27 SURVEY The CONSULTANT shall perform survey tasks in accordance with all applicable statutes, manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memoranda. The CONSULTANT shall submit all survey notes and computations to document the surveys. All field survey work shall be recorded in approved media and submitted to the COUNTY. Field books submitted to the COUNTY must be of an approved type. The field books shall be certified by the surveyor in responsible charge of work being performed before the final product is submitted. The survey notes shall include documentation of decisions reached from meetings, telephone conversations or site visits. All like work (such as bench lines, reference points, etc.) shall be recorded contiguously. The COUNTY may not accept field survey radial locations of section corners, platted subdivision lot and block corners, alignment control points, alignment control reference points and certified section corner references. The COUNTY may instead require that these points be surveyed by true line, traverse or parallel offset or Global Positioning Systems (GPS) methods. 27.1 Horizontal Project Control (HPC) Establish or recover HPC, for the purpose of establishing horizontal control on the Florida State Plane Coordinate System or datum approved by the COUNTY Project Manager may include primary or secondary control points. Includes analysis and processing of all field collected data, and preparation of forms. 27.2 Vertical Project Control (VPC) Establish or recover VPC, for the purpose of establishing vertical control on datum approved by the COUNTY Project Manager may include primary or secondary vertical control points. Includes analysis and processing of all field collected data, and preparation of forms. Page 1205 of 5277 27.3 Alignment and/or Existing Right of Way (R/W) Lines Establish, recover or re-establish project alignment. Also includes analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports for identifying mainline, ramp, offset, or secondary alignments. Depict alignment and/or existing R/W lines (in required format) per COUNTY R/W Maps, platted or dedicated rights of way. 27.4 Aerial Targets Place, locate, and maintain required aerial targets and/or photo identifiable points. Includes analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports. Placement of the targets will be at the discretion of the aerial firm. 27.5 Reference Points Reference Horizontal Project Control (HPC) points, project alignment, vertical control points, section, ¼ section, center of section corners and General Land Office (G.L.O.) corners as required. 27.6 Topography/Digital Terrain Model (DTM) (3D) Locate all above ground features and improvements for the limits of the project by collecting the required data for the purpose of creating a DTM with sufficient density. Shoot all break lines, high and low points. Effort includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports. 27.7 Planimetric (2D) Locate all above ground features and improvements. Deliver in appropriate electronic format. Effort includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports. 27.8 Roadway Cross Sections/Profiles Perform cross sections or profiles. May include analysis and processing of all field-collected data for comparison with DTM. 27.9 Side Street Surveys Refer to tasks of this document as applicable. 27.10 Underground Utilities Designation includes 2-dimensional collection of existing utilities and selected 3-dimensional verification as needed for designation. Location includes non-destructive excavation to determine size, type and location of existing utility, as necessary for final 3-dimensional verification. Survey includes collection of data on points as needed for designates and locates. Includes analysis and processing of all field collected data, and delivery of all appropriate electronic files. The CONSULTANT shall SUE all locations that include new underground infrastructure or earthwork excavation (i.e., drilled shafts, bridge piles, strain poles, mast arms, miscellaneous foundations, drainage structures, pipe culverts, new ditches, etc.). The expectation is for the CONSULTANT to know exactly where all existing underground utilities and infrastructure are located in areas that work will be performed to properly design for any new underground infrastructure or earthwork excavation that will be constructed on the project. The CONSULTANT’S approach to practicing SUE shall be consistent with the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Standard (CI/ASCE 38-02) entitled “Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data” as follows: • Identify utility owners that have facilities on, or may be affected by, the project limits. Contact these utility owners (face to face meetings recommended) and provide them with information about the proposed project and schedule periodic follow- up meetings. (ASCE Quality Level D). • Review all information that can be obtained and plot on utility composite drawing (CADD file to be furnished). (ASCE Page 1206 of 5277 Quality Level D). • Make field observations to identify visible above-ground utility features. Provide all information in field sketches so surveyor can prepare a complete survey and plot a rectilinear grid. (ASCE Quality Level C) • Use appropriate surface geophysical methods (i.e., pipe and cable locators, terrain conductivity methods, resistively measurements, metal detectors, Ground Penetrating Radar, etc.) to designate existing subsurface utilities or to trace a particular utility system. This provides two-dimensional horizontal information. Place paint marks on the ground. Place identification flags or stakes on the paint marks or coding on the pavement and survey to project controls. Depict resulting information via computer aided design and drafting (CADD). Provide notes and sketches to designer of record and/or on- site engineer. Non-tonable (non-metallic) utilities will be discussed at this time with the designer of record and/or on-site engineer. (ASCE Quality Level B). • Meet with designer of record and/or on-site engineer to determine utility conflicts and ASCE Quality Level A test hole locations. • Expose selected subsurface utilities to obtain three-dimensional information. Use minimally intrusive excavation methods, such as vacuum excavation and Air-Lance. Depict resulting information. Resolve differences between all information gathered. Provide test hole data sheets (THDS) to designer of record and/or on-site engineer. All test holes are to be back-filled as described below. (ASCE Quality Level A). On completion, test holes shall be restored to the following: a. Backfilled with in-kind material b. Placed backfill using proper techniques c. Restored pavement with in-kind material d. Restored areas outside of pavement to pre-excavation conditions • Collect and store utility location and condition information in a database for asset management. Provide a detailed report of utility locations, depths, size, type, etc. All information shall be provided in the format preapproved by the COUNTY. 27.11 Outfall Survey Locate all above ground features and improvements for the limits of the project by collecting the required data for the purpose of a DTM. Survey with sufficient density of shots. Shoot all break lines, high and low points. Includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports. 27.12 Drainage Survey Locate underground data (XYZ, pipe size, type, condition and flow line) that relates to above ground data. Includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports. 27.13 Bridge Survey (Minor/Major) Locate required above ground features and improvements for the limits of the bridge. Includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports. 27.14 Channel Survey Locate all topographic features and improvements for the limits of the project by collecting the required data. Includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, maps, and/or reports. 27.15 Pond Site Survey Refer to tasks of this document as applicable. 27.16 Mitigation Survey Refer to tasks of this document as applicable. Page 1207 of 5277 27.17 Jurisdiction Line Survey Perform field location (2-dimensional) of jurisdiction limits as defined by respective authorities, also includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, preparation of reports. 27.18 Geotechnical Support Perform 3-dimensional (X,Y,Z) field location, or stakeout, of boring sites established by geotechnical engineer. Includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data and/or reports. 27.19 Sectional/Grant Survey Perform field location/placement of section corners, 1/4 section corners, and fractional corners where pertinent. Includes analysis and processing of all field-collected data and/or reports. 27.20 Subdivision Location Survey all existing recorded subdivision/condominium boundaries, tracts, units, phases, blocks, street R/W lines, common areas. Includes analysis and processing of all field collected data and/or reports. If unrecorded subdivision is on file in the public records of the subject COUNTY, tie existing monumentation of the beginning and end of unrecorded subdivision. 27.21 Maintained R/W Perform field location (2-dimensional) of maintained R/W limits as defined by respective authorities, if needed. Also includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, preparation of reports. 27.22 Boundary Survey Perform boundary survey as defined by COUNTY standards. Includes analysis and processing of all field-collected data, preparation of reports. 27.23 Water Boundary Survey Perform Mean High Water, Ordinary High Water and Safe Upland Line surveys as required by COUNTY standards. 27.24 Right of Way Staking, Parcel / Right of Way Line Perform field staking and calculations of existing/proposed R/W lines for on-site review purposes. 27.25 Right of Way Monumentation Set R/W monumentation as depicted on final R/W maps for corridor and water retention areas. 27.26 Line Cutting Perform all efforts required to clear vegetation from the line of sight. 27.27 Work Zone Safety Provide work zone as required by COUNTY standards. 27.28 Vegetation Survey Locate vegetation within the project limits. Page 1208 of 5277 27.29 Tree Survey Locate individual trees or palms within the project limits. 27.30 Miscellaneous Surveys Refer to tasks of this document, as applicable, to perform surveys not described herein. The percent for Supplemental will be determined at negotiations. This item can only be used if authorized in writing by the COUNTY Project Manager or their representative. 27.31 Supplemental Surveys Supplemental survey days and hours are to be approved in advance by DS or DLS. Refer to tasks of this document, as applicable, to perform surveys not described herein. 27.32 Document Research Perform research of documentation to support field and office efforts involving surveying and mapping. 27.33 Field Review Perform verification of the field conditions as related to the collected survey data. 27.34 Technical Meetings Attend meetings as required and negotiated by the Surveying and Mapping Department. 27.35 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Establish and implement a QA/QC plan. Also includes subconsultant review, response to comments and any resolution meetings if required, preparation of submittals for review, etc. 27.36 Supervision Perform all activities required to supervise and coordinate project. These activities must be performed by the project supervisor, a Florida P.S.M. or their delegate as approved by the COUNTY Project Manager. 27.37 Coordination Coordinate survey activities with other disciplines. These activities must be performed by the project supervisor, a Florida P.S.M. or their delegate as approved by the COUNTY Project Manager. 28 PHOTOGRAMMETRY – N/A 29 MAPPING The CONSULTANT will be responsible for the preparation of control survey maps, right of way maps, maintenance maps, sketches, other miscellaneous survey maps, and legal descriptions as required for this project in accordance with all applicable COUNTY and FDOT Manuals, Procedures, Handbooks, District specific requirements, and Florida Statutes. All maps, surveys and legal descriptions will be prepared under the direction of a Florida Professional Surveyor and Mapper (PSM) to COUNTY size and format requirements utilizing COUNTY approved software and will be designed to provide a high degree of uniformity and maximum readability. All right of way maps shall include temporary easements except for the final right of way map, which shall exclude all temporary easements, and which shall be presented in a form suitable for recording (similar to the recordation of plat maps) and shall comply with all requirements of the Collier County Clerk of Courts Recording Department. The CONSULTANT will submit maps, legal descriptions, quality assurance check prints, checklists, electronic media files and any other documents as required for this project to the COUNTY for review at stages of completion as negotiated. The Sketch and Page 1209 of 5277 Description shall meet the Accuracy Standards as adopted by ALTA and ACSM and the Minimum Technical Standards of the State of Florida in effect on the date of certification. A Closure Report will be certified by the licensed land surveyor and submitted with or on the Sketch and Description. All Sketches accompanying Descriptions shall include a graphical depiction of the location of all utility easements that encumber the described parcel. Sketches shall also include a reference to the Official Records Book and page number of each utility easement depicted thereon. Obtaining any Title Searches that may be required is the responsibility of the CONSULTANT. Master CADD File 29.1 Alignment 29.2 Section and 1/4 Section Lines 29.3 Subdivisions / Property Lines 29.4 Existing Right of Way 29.5 Topography 29.6 Parent Tract Properties and Existing Easements 29.7 Proposed Right of Way Requirements The ENGINEER OF RECORD (EOR) will provide the proposed requirements. The PSM is responsible for calculating the final geometry. Notification of Final Right of Way Requirements along with the purpose and duration of all easements will be specified in writing. 29.8 Limits of Construction The limits of construction DGN file as provided by the EOR will be imported or referenced to the master CADD file. Additional labeling will be added as required. The PSM is required to advise the EOR of any noted discrepancies between the limits of construction line and the existing/proposed right of way lines, and for making adjustments as needed when a resolution is determined. 29.9 Jurisdictional/Agency Lines These lines may include, but are not limited to, jurisdictional, wetland, water boundaries, and city/county limit lines. Sheet Files 29.10 Control Survey Cover Sheet 29.11 Control Survey Key Sheet 29.12 Control Survey Detail Sheet 29.13 Right of Way Map Cover Sheet 29.14 Right of Way Map Key Sheet 29.15 Right of Way Map Detail Sheet 29.16 Maintenance Map Cover Sheet 29.17 Maintenance Map Key Sheet 29.18 Maintenance Map Detail Sheet 29.19 Reference Point Sheet This sheet(s) will be included with the Control Survey Map, Right of Way Map and Maintenance Map. 29.20 Project Control Sheet This sheet depicts the baseline, the benchmarks, the primary and secondary control points and their reference points including the type of material used for each point, their XYZ coordinates, scale factors and convergence angles. This sheet(s) may be included with the Control Survey Map, Right of Way Map and Maintenance Map. 29.21 Table of Ownerships Sheet Miscellaneous Surveys and Sketches 29.22 Parcel Sketches 29.23 TIITF Sketches Page 1210 of 5277 29.24 Other Specific Purpose Survey(s) 29.25 Boundary Survey(s) Map 29.26 Right of Way Monumentation Map 29.27 Title Search Map 29.28 Title Search Report 29.29 Legal Descriptions 29.30 Final Map/Plans Comparison The PSM will perform a comparison of the final right of way maps with the available construction plans to review the correctness of the type of parcel to be acquired and the stations/offsets to the required right of way. The PSM will coordinate with the EOR to resolve any conflicts or discrepancies and provide documentation of the review. 29.31 Field Reviews 29.32 Technical Meetings 29.33 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 29.34 Supervision 29.35 Coordination 29.36 Supplemental Mapping This task is to cover efforts resulting from major design and/or development changes after 60% map development that affect the right of way requirements/parent tract property lines and may include any number of tasks. Request and approval to utilize the Supplemental Mapping hours will be in writing and approved by the COUNTY project manager prior to any work being done under this task. 30 TERRESTRIAL MOBILE LiDAR – N/A 31 ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT – N/A 32 NOISE BARRIERS IMPACT DESIGN ASSESSMENT IN THE DESIGN PHASE The CONSULTANT shall fulfill the commitments resulting from the traffic noise analysis and noise barrier evaluation performed during the Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Phase, as directed and clarified by the COUNTY. The noise analysis shall be performed in accordance with the FDOT's Noise Policy (Part 2, Chapter 17 of the FDOT's PD&E Manual) and the FDOT's Traffic Noise Modeling and Analysis Guidelines. The noise analysis and noise abatement evaluation shall be performed by or supervised/reviewed by a person(s) who has attended the Department's Traffic Noise Analysis training course or has attended and successfully completed the National Highway Institute's Highway Traffic Noise Course (FHWA-NHI- 142051). The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) approved noise model, the Traffic Noise Model (TNM) Version 2.5 (or most current version) shall be used for the noise analysis, unless otherwise directed by the COUNTY. 32.1 Noise Analysis The CONSULTANT shall review the preferred PD&E alternative to identify any design changes that would require a reanalysis of traffic noise. Coordination will be held with the District Environmental Management Office, prior to initiating any reanalysis, to discuss possible effects of design changes on the validity of in the noise study performed during PD&E. The CONSULTANT shall perform a land use review to identify noise sensitive sites that may have received a building permit subsequent to the PD&E noise study but prior to the Date of Public Knowledge (DPK), or to identify areas where the land use may have changed or is subject to change. New noise sensitive sites meeting DPK requirements that were not considered during the PD&E phase will be subject to a traffic noise analysis to be performed by the CONSULTANT. Additionally, noise sensitive sites analyzed in the PD&E phase may have to be re-analyzed if affected by design changes. The CONSULTANT shall review any commitments made during the PD&E phase regarding possible traffic noise impacts to special use locations. Analysis of special use locations shall be performed using the FDOT's "A Method to Determine Reasonableness and Feasibility of Noise Abatement at Special Use Locations" document and shall be coordinated with the District Environmental Management Office. Page 1211 of 5277 The CONSULTANT shall review the commitments made during the PD&E phase regarding noise barrier concepts determined to be potentially feasible and reasonable. The CONSULTANT will update the analysis of feasibility and reasonableness for noise barriers recommended for further consideration during the design phase and for any additional noise barriers required, using design information (e.g., profile data, horizontal alignment data, etc.) and incorporate into the analysis any new conditions or additional costs related to noise barrier construction that have been identified during design. A design phase noise analysis will be performed at any additional locations required (based on DPK requirements or roadway design changes). Additional survey may also be required at proposed barrier locations. Changes to, or fulfillment of, the original noise abatement commitments made during PD&E shall be documented in a Noise Study Report (NSR) Addendum to be prepared by the CONSULTANT in coordination with the District Environmental Management Office. A copy of the final NSR Addendum shall be provided to the District Environmental Management Office. Traffic Data: The CONSULTANT shall review the traffic data obtained during the PD&E phase to determine if the data remains valid for design phase reanalysis. If the traffic data is no longer valid, the CONSULTANT shall provide to the noise analyst the following data for each road segment (i.e. intersection to intersection) for the design year with the proposed improvements to the road:  Level of Service C (LOS C) directional volumes  Demand peak hour volumes (peak and off-peak directions)  Posted speed  Percentage of heavy trucks (HT) in the design hour  Percentage of medium trucks (MT) in the design hour  Percentage of buses in the design hour  Percentage of motorcycles (MC) in the design hour Except for LOS C volumes, the data above shall also be provided for all interchange/highway ramps. The COUNTY Project Manager may also identify cross streets for which the same data is necessary. (i.e., a cross street for which noise sensitive sites are in close proximity to the project). The CONSULTANT shall contact the COUNTY Project Manager for direction on the format to be used for providing the traffic data and any requirements regarding approval of the data prior to its use for noise analysis. The traffic data to be used in the noise analysis must be generated by a qualified traffic engineer/planner who works for the COUNTY or is a COUNTY consultant. 32.2 Noise Barrier Evaluation The CONSULTANT will present the data along with recommendations to the COUNTY for selection of the noise barrier's locations, barriers heights and lengths to be incorporated into the design plans. These recommendations shall consider the noise barrier feasibility and reasonableness. An evaluation of proposed noise barriers will be performed to identify any engineering conflicts or constraints. The CONSULTANT will be responsible for documenting any resolutions to engineering conflicts or issues that require modification to or preclude construction of a noise barrier. At a minimum, the engineering review will consider the following:  Right of way needs including access rights (air, light, view, ingress/egress, outdoor advertising conflicts)  Limited access issues  Necessary construction and maintenance easements  Safety issues (e.g., line of sight)  Maintenance issues  Structural and vegetative restrictions within easement  Utility conflicts  Drainage issues  Environmental issues Page 1212 of 5277  Other criteria as applicable The CONSULTANT shall re-analyze noise barrier(s) for feasibility and reasonableness and re-establish barrier height and length if design constraints require alteration in a barrier's location or dimensions. After reestablishing the recommended height and length of the barrier(s), the CONSULTANT shall coordinate with design engineers and the COUNTY Project Manager to include the barrier(s) on the design plans. In addition, the CONSULTANT will present a memo to the COUNTY Project Manager containing a recommendation for selection of the barrier height and length to be carried forward for public input. This recommendation shall consider amount of noise reduction provided, engineering constraints and cost (reasonableness). In addition, the CONSULTANT will also consider the overall visual appearance in relation to the existing and proposed site conditions. This includes smoothing the profile along the top of a noise barrier to the extent possible while minimizing any loss in the amount of noise reduction provided and extending the ends of a noise barrier to cover additional receivers. Extending the ends of a noise barrier will not exceed the cost criteria and will only be performed when it is appropriate and in the public interest. 32.3 Public Involvement If noise barriers are determined to be feasible and cost reasonable, the CONSULTANT shall carry out the public involvement and surveys necessary to report to the COUNTY whether or not the majority of the impacted and/or benefited receptors desire the construction of a noise barrier. Input shall also be obtained from the public regarding barrier aesthetics (color and texture) on one or both sides of the barrier. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for coordinating with local government officials. As a minimum, the following tasks shall be completed by the CONSULTANT for public involvement purposes:  Identification of impacted and/or benefited property owners  Identification of renters and non-residing property owners (for a property that may be rented)  Preparation of a mailing list (property owners, renters and non-residing property owners)  Preparation of a summary package (including an information letter, aerial showing the noise barrier location and a survey form to document the recipients position to be sent to property owners, and occupants/non-residing property owners informing them of the proposed noise barrier  If necessary, preparation of additional mailings and/or door-to-door/telephone surveys until a majority decision is obtained or until directed by the COUNTY Project Manager  Tallying of survey results  Noise barrier aesthetics coordination  Public meetings coordination (including arranging the meeting location, advertisements, displays, etc.)  Responding to public inquiries on an individual basis in coordination with the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall bring to the attention of the COUNTY unforeseen conditions and issues which are relevant to the project decision. Other than noise barrier length, height and location, the CONSULTANT shall abstain from indicating preferences for any of the barrier options prior to or during contact with the property owners unless specifically requested to do so by the COUNTY. Following the public involvement process, the CONSULTANT shall produce a final noise barrier recommendation that identifies the starting and ending points for all noise barriers, the top elevation(s), and the aesthetic elements to be provided (e.g. - color, texture, graphics). 32.4 Outdoor Advertising Identification The CONSULTANT shall identify potential noise barriers that may block the view of an existing lawfully erected sign that is governed by and conforms to state and federal requirements for land use, size, height and spacing consistent with the requirements of Florida Statute (FS) 479.25 and the FDOT Noise Policy (Part 2, Chapter 17 of the PD&E Manual). The CONSULTANT shall notify the COUNTY Project Manager of a potential noise barrier(s) that may affect the visibility of a legally permitted outdoor advertising sign. Resolution of the potential conflict shall be documented in the NSR and included in the environmental document. Page 1213 of 5277 32.5 Noise Study Report (NSR) Addendum The results of noise barrier evaluations performed by the CONSULTANT shall be documented in the NSR Addendum (in accordance with Chapter 264 of the FDOT Design Manual (FDM)) and shall include the results of the computer modeling (electronically), public involvement activities and final noise abatement commitments. 32.6 Technical Meetings Prior to proceeding with the noise barrier analysis, the CONSULTANT shall discuss and coordinate with the appropriate COUNTY Project Manager and the Transportation Management Office staff. The purpose of this discussion will be for the COUNTY to provide the CONSULTANT with all pertinent project information and to confirm the methodologies to be used to conduct the noise analysis. This meeting is mandatory and should occur after the Notice to Proceed is given to the CONSULTANT. It is the responsibility of the CONSULTANT to undertake the necessary action (e.g. phone calls, meetings, correspondence, etc.) to ensure that COUNTY Project Manager is kept informed of the noise analysis efforts so that these tasks are accomplished in a manner that will enhance the overall success of the project. 32.7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control QA/QC reviews will be performed for all NSR Addendums submitted to the COUNTY. Documentation of the QA/QC will be provided to the COUNTY Project Manager. The CONSULTANT shall ensure that the noise barrier(s) location(s), length, height and aesthetics as shown on the final design plans are consistent with the results of the noise barrier evaluation and recommendation documented in the original NSR and/or the NSR Addendum. 32.8 Supervision 32.9 Coordination 33 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Intelligent Transportations System (ITS) Analysis Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, existing ITS standard operating procedures, ITS master and strategic plans, Florida's SEMP guidelines, National, statewide and/or regional ITS architectures, and current design bulletins. 33.1 ITS Analysis The CONSULTANT shall review the approved preliminary engineering report, typical section package, traffic technical memorandum and proposed geometric design alignment to identify impacts to existing ITS components (if applicable) and proposed ITS field device placements. The CONSULTANT shall review all related District ITS plans and documentation for the project corridor to ensure all cited ITS elements are included in this project, and develop a Concept of Operations (ConOps), Project Systems Engineering Management Plan (PSEMP), RTVM, and other documents as necessary for conformance with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requirements. The CONSULTANT shall use applicable COUNTY and FDOT requirements and guidelines, including, but not limited to, the FDM, Standard Plans, and Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction in the design of ITS. The CONSULTANT design is expected to include the following attributes, facilities, infrastructure, ITS devices, systems, and associated work: [Insert project specifics (e.g. TMC facilities; communication system design; SunGuide software system installation or expansion; deployment of ITS device such as DMS, CCTV cameras, vehicle detection systems, etc.)] CCTV camera system shall provide 100 percent coverage of all mainline lanes, entrance and exit ramps, interchanges (includes view of crossing arterials), blind spots (such as those caused due to existing and proposed bridges, existing and proposed signage, vegetation, and horizontal and vertical curvatures). Cameras shall be spaced to meet the Project requirements, guidance from the ConOps, and as approved by the COUNTY. Vehicle detection devices shall be spaced as required to meet the Project requirements (speed, volume, and occupancy detection), guidance from the ConOps and as approved by the COUNTY. Page 1214 of 5277 Both expressway and arterial dynamic message signs (DMS) shall be located to meet the Project requirements, guidance from the ConOps, and as approved by the COUNTY. All FDOT FDM requirements shall be met for DMS locations. DMS locations shall be designed in conjunction with the Project’s master signing design. The CONSULTANT shall review the existing TMC Operations and develop additional incident management service requirements as necessary to support during the Construction Phase of the Project. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with COUNTY and the COUNTY’s Traffic Operations ITS Office for additional information regarding existing Incident Management and TMC Operational Procedures (If desired by the COUNTY or District). All ITS devices shall be compatible with the latest version of the National Transportation Communications for ITS Protocol (NTCIP) and compatible with SunGuide software platform. The CONSULTANT shall design the project such that all ITS field devices and ancillary components comply with FDOT’s Approved Product List (APL) and are supported within the SunGuide software or other software approved by the COUNTY. Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Camera Assembly The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design and exact field locations for the camera assemblies. The camera subsystem shall provide overlapping coverage to overcome visual blockage. Camera assemblies may include a camera lowering device (CLD). The camera subsystem shall be designed to provide additional benefits such as the monitoring of DMS operations and security surveillance of critical infrastructure elements. A stand-alone DMS confirmation camera shall be designed and installed to support TMC operations to verify and confirm the posted DMS messages (if desired by the COUNTY). The position, height, and design of each camera pole shall be finalized during the design phase of the project. Each site shall be designed for overall monitoring capability, as well as designed to provide safe and effective maintenance conditions. The camera assembly deployment shall be designed to provide fields of view that give the required corridor coverage. The CONSULTANT shall determine the camera location by performing a videography study at each proposed camera site. The study shall include video at the proposed camera location and elevation with respect to the roadway elevation. The CONSULTANT shall identify the final number and locations of the camera assemblies based on the videography study. The camera system design shall ensure that the video quality is not degraded due to wind or vibration. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design of the poles and foundations to minimize the potential for vibration. The CONSULTANT shall prepare cross section plan sheets showing details of horizontal and vertical clearances of the proposed equipment with identified utilities. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design of the grounding and lightning protection system based on FDOT criteria. The CCTV camera assembly shall comply with the latest version of FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Supplemental Specification 682. Vehicle Detection Subsystem The CONSULTANT shall select vehicle detection technology to meet the Project needs, ConOps requirements, and as approved by the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design of a non-intrusive vehicle detection subsystem for the roadway facilities. The detectors shall be positioned near other ITS field device infrastructure including the fiber-optic splice vaults when feasible to reduce cost. Final detection station locations shall be based on a number of location variables identified during the design phase. The vehicle detection subsystem shall collect and process volume, speed and occupancy data on a lane-by-lane basis for the corridor mainlines, in both directions of travel. The data will be used by the TMC for functions including detecting incidents, Page 1215 of 5277 determining travel times, estimating traffic conditions for dissemination to travelers, sharing information with other agencies, and data archiving for transportation planning and historical data analysis. The vehicle detection subsystem shall allow for connectivity to the TMC. Vehicle detectors must meet the Project requirements under all environmental and traffic conditions expected for the corridors. The detection system shall produce accurate volume, speed and occupancy data for all corridor traffic operation conditions. The CONSULTANT design must limit the likelihood of occlusions, other blocking of vehicles and adjacent lanes detection that degrade the detection system performance below specified accuracy. Design the system so that signs, walls, guardrails, and other physical elements do not degrade detection performance. The system shall allow remote configuration, calibration, monitoring, and diagnostic of real-time traffic activities from a remote location, such as the TMC, using the FDOT SunGuide central software and software provided by the detection system vendor. The CONSULTANT shall determine the exact location of the field devices to meet the desired coverage and functional requirements of vehicle detectors. The detector and associated cabinet locations shall be identified by the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT will coordinate and perform a detailed site survey with a factory trained and certified representative of the detection system manufacturer being proposed in their design. The site survey must confirm that the design does not exceed the operational capabilities of the proposed detection technology or device. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design of a vehicle detection system that allows travel times to be automatically calculated for roadway facilities. The travel time system may utilize a variety of vehicle detection systems, including loop, video, microwave, wireless magnetometer, and Automatic Vehicle Identification (AVI) systems. The system shall utilize the project communications backbone in order to collect and distribute travel time data to the TMCs. When utilizing transponders, they will be read by AVI reader equipment placed at checkpoints along the roadway. As a transponder passes a checkpoint, its data shall be acquired by the AVI system. The AVI system shall automatically add the time, date, transponder reading antenna number, and the antenna location to the transponder identification code and store the data. Systems that rely upon transponders shall utilize supplemental toll tag readers placed at appropriate existing device locations as applicable, as well as interchanges and at intermediate locations throughout the project as required to provide the required coverage to satisfy travel time measurement requirements. Using the designed communications, the transponder information shall be forwarded to the TMC for further processing. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate all design efforts for use of SunPass AVI transponders with the Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise (FTE) Tolls group. The vehicle detection system utilized shall comply with the latest version of FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Specification 660. Dynamic Message Sign Subsystem – As needed. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design of the DMS subsystem for the roadway facilities. The position of each DMS shall be finalized during the design phase of the project. The CONSULTANT shall select DMS technology, type, and display to meet the Project requirements and ConOps requirements. The CONSULTANT shall locate the DMS to satisfy the required sign functionality and to provide the required visibility of the signs. The project communications system shall enable full control of the DMS from the TMC facilities. All DMS hardware, software and related infrastructure components shall be fully compatible with SunGuide software. All DMS shall include a dedicated confirmation camera that allows for visual verification of the messages posted on the DMS by a TMC Operator (if desired by the COUNTY). The CONSULTANT shall design support structures to accommodate the specified DMS to meet the design functional, operational, and maintenance requirements. Page 1216 of 5277 The DMS shall be designed in accordance with the latest version of FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Supplemental Specification 700. All Highway Signing, including Dynamic Message Signs, shall comply with the latest version of FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Specification 700. Roadway Weather Information Systems (RWIS) -As needed. The CONSULTANT shall develop Technical Special Provisions or Modified Special Provisions for RWIS based upon the unique needs of the project. The CONSULTANT shall ensure that, each RWIS site consists of a remote processing unit (RPU), communication hardware, and determine the site-specific components as required from below: Fog/Smoke Detection Sensor; Classifying Precipitation; Precipitation Occurrence Sensor; Air Temperature/Relative Humidity Sensor; Wind Speed and Direction Sensor; RWIS Tower/Pole Structure, foundation, base, and cabinet with electrical service, and lightning protection & grounding assembly; and, Communication hardware. The RWIS subsystem shall include all hardware, software, and licenses to operate, including SQL database for the TMC and RWIS Central Hardware for TMC. 33.2 Communications Subsystem Analysis See FDM 233.4, 233.5, and 233.8 for communication systems design requirements. The CONSULTANT shall review the existing communication files in GIS or PDF format provided by the COUNTY and or the local highway agencies and create an overall communication map to summarize mapping data associated with the fiber optic conduits and cables connectivity. This provides a communication location-based intelligence for the project and will be used in the communication design. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall include high level overview of how the project corridor(s) are connected to the TMC communication network including the existing and proposed master communication hubs. The CONSULTANT shall develop a communications plan to determine the optimal communications medium for the project corridor. The plan shall be developed prior to submittal of Phase I plans. The plan shall identify communications media alternatives and provide a cost estimate that includes initial, operations and maintenance cost for the life cycle of the communications network. The plan shall ensure that video, voice, and data will be communicated in real-time between center to-field and center-to-center (C2C) nodes as applicable. The communications system design must utilize non- proprietary, open- architecture, standards-based, robust, scalable, and proven technology. The communication plan analysis shall address communication and connections between field devices, communications and connections between field devices and the TMC, center-to-center communications between TMCs, and any other communication links or connections required to meet project goals and ConOps guidance. The plan must include bandwidth analysis and recommendations, needs assessment, and provide recommendations regarding minimum requirements, media, network devices, protocols, network topology, communication redundancy, future needs, spare capacity, and any communications or data sharing with other agencies. The plan must include loss budget analysis and calculations for the optical cable lengths and bandwidth. The CONSULTANT shall provide the calculations confirming the loss budgets are in conformance with allowable values established in the standard specifications. The CONSULTANT shall calculate the loss budgets based on distance, anticipated fusion splices, and connectors to ensure the cabling will work with the links intended to be used. After installation, the loss budget for the cabling is compared to the actual test results during final acceptance to ensure the cable plant is installed properly. For major widening projects where the existing underground fiber optic communication cables and ITS sites are impacted, the CONSULTANT shall review the roadway, drainage, and TTCP plans to analyze and identify the magnitude of impact to the existing ITS infrastructure. The CONSULTANT shall prepare the Maintenance of Communication (MOC) concept that supports the final design in efforts to maintain and sustain center-to-field device connectivity and operability to the existing Page 1217 of 5277 ITS field devices previously deployed along the project corridor. The MOC analysis shall consider and mitigate the impacts of the project's various construction phases so as to sustain center-to-field devices connectivity and operability in order to maintain operational quality as a minimum at the level provided prior to construction start and minimizing down time of the critical devices. After approval of the plan, the CONSULTANT shall submit a revised plan including a detailed design analysis for each submittal. The CONSULTANT's communications design shall include multiple redundant paths for each location, which allows for automatic switching of communications path onto a secondary path, if the primary path is impacted (if desired by the COUNTY). 33.3 Grounding, Surge Suppression, and Lightning Protection Analysis The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for a complete and reliable grounding, surge suppression, and lightning protection design to provide personnel and equipment protection against faults, surge currents and lightning transients. When Standards Plans depicting air terminal device heights above poles or equipment are not available, the height of the air terminal above poles or equipment shall be determined using applicable standards. See FDM 233.3.8 for additional design requirements. 33.4 Power Subsystem See FDM Section 233.3 for ITS Power Design Requirements. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for an electrical design in accordance with all NEC requirements. No solar power should be utilized as a power solution for the Project unless otherwise approved by the COUNTY. To enhance power reliability, the CONSULTANT shall design a power distribution and backup system consisting of, at a minimum, underground power conduits and conductors, transformers, diesel fuel generators, automatic transfer switches (ATS), uninterruptable power supply (UPS), electrical distribution panel, equipment framing, reinforced concrete pad for the generator, site drainage, site security fencing and security camera (as directed by the COUNTY), power command and control, Ethernet-based Modbus, and ITS Cabinet with Remote Power Management Unit (RPMU), and all associated equipment. The power backup system shall supply electrical power in event of commercial power supply failure for all system components. Power equipment shall be installed in areas to avoid wet locations. All connections and equipment shall be protected from moisture and water intrusion. The CONSULTANT shall ensure that vandal resistant mechanisms for all electrical infrastructure shall be included as part of the Design. The CONSULTANT shall submit the power system design and voltage drop calculations for the power distribution system as part of phase II, III, and IV design submittals. The CONSULTANT shall conduct a short circuit and protection coordination study for the designed power system and document the study as part of the power system design report. 33.5 Voltage Drop Calculations See FDM Section 233.3.6 for voltage drop design requirements. The electrical design shall address allowable voltage drops per the NEC. The CONSULTANT shall submit voltage drop calculations for any electrical circuit providing power to the ITS field devices beyond the electric utility service point. The calculations shall document the length of each circuit, its load, the size of the conductor or conductors and their ohm resistance values and the required voltages from the service point to the respective ITS devices to maintain voltage drops within allowable limits. The voltage drop incurred on each circuit (total volts and percentage of drop) shall be calculated, and all work necessary to calculate the voltage drop values for each circuit should be presented in such a manner as to be duplicated by the COUNTY. Load analysis calculations shall be submitted covering electrical path from all power sources to each ITS site connected to each power source. All voltage drop calculations shall allow for future expansion of ITS infrastructure, if identified in the Project ConOps. 33.6 Design Documentation The CONSULTANT shall submit a Design Documentation Book with each plan submittal under separate cover and not part of the roadway documentation book. At a minimum, the design documentation book shall include:  Quantities and engineers estimate for all applicable items on plans.  Phase submittal checklist.  Three-way quantity check list  Structural calculations for all structures Page 1218 of 5277  Power Design Analysis, voltage drop calculations, and load analysis calculations  Correspondences including utility design meeting and conflict resolutions  Electrical Power Service Letter of Confirmation  Subsurface Utility Exploration tables for each ITS support structure 33.7 Existing ITS The CONSULTANT shall research any required legacy system or system components that may be impacted by new work, such as: existing communications; existing types, numbers, locations, models, manufacturers, and age of ITS devices; as- built plans; existing operating software; existing center-to-field devices; and C2C communications and capabilities. The project intelligence files provided by the COUNTY and researched by the CONSULTANT may include the following documents:  Existing ITS field devices compared to the latest FDOT Standards and District requirements: device type, model, manufacturer, capabilities, condition, date installed, and historical maintenance logs. The COUNTY will provide the ITS FM data, when available, to the CONSULTANT upon request.  Condition of support structure(s), and associated mechanical brackets, and vertical hangers.  Electrical power related to the existing demand loads, sizes of the main and branch circuit breakers for the service disconnect, underground or overhead service feeder sizes from the power company transformer to the meter base.  Existing fiber optic allocation as a graphical display of the existing buffer tube for the ITS devices at the Managed Field Ethernet Switch points, the buffer allocated for the existing local communication hubs, given number of connections within a corridor while maintaining the maximum number of physical connection on a specific Local Area Network (LAN), and local hubs to existing master communication hubs.  A KMZ file of the existing fiber optic pull and splice boxes, ITS devices, local hubs, power service poles with latitudes and longitudes data.  Underground infrastructure.  Proximity to utilities.  Other field reconnaissance as necessary to develop a complete ITS design package. 33.8 Queue Analysis The CONSULTANT shall perform a queue analysis at high volume interchanges and high frequency conflict / crash locations to determine optimal placement of DMS using project forecasted traffic volumes. This analysis shall be performed prior to submittal of the Phase I plans. The Consultant shall perform other traffic engineering analysis as necessary to ensure that the DMS locations are selected based on optimum message delivery to the motorists. The CONSULTANT shall perform field observation of the existing traffic patterns during the normal peak hours to determine the optimal placement of DMS, ADMS, CCTV cameras, and detection sites. The CONSULTANT shall perform lane closure analysis and determine the time periods where construction activities can be performed. The lane closure analysis shall be performed using the available traffic data. In cases when traffic technical memorandums have been performed by others and are available through the COUNTY, or available from TMC CCTV camera surveillance sites, the CONSULTANT shall use these reports and information in lieu of performing traffic engineering and safety analysis. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with COUNTY Transportation Operations for additional information regarding existing Incident Management and TMC Operational Procedures to address maintenance of ITS and post construction requirements. 33.9 Reference and Master ITS Design File The CONSULTANT shall prepare the ITS design file to include all necessary design elements and the reference files for topo, R/W roadway, utilities files, etc. This effort includes the design and layout of all proposed ITS devices and electrical service points, conduits, pull boxes, conductor sizing, generators, and transformers. All existing ITS infrastructure shall be Page 1219 of 5277 referenced to the new ITS plan sheets (if applicable). 33.10 Reference and Master Communications Design File The CONSULTANT shall prepare the communication design file to include all necessary design elements and all associated reference files as well as reference files of topo, R/W, roadway, utilities files, existing ITS communications infrastructure, etc. This effort includes design and layout of proposed communications conduit, cabinet, pull boxes, splice boxes, standard route markers, communications plan overview, fiber optic sizing, fiber optic splicing, connections, communications hubs, etc. 33.11 ITS Poles and Overhead Structures Elevation Analysis See FDM Section 233.6 for ITS Poles and Structures design requirements. The CONSULTANT shall evaluate pole elevation requirements and design pole heights to meet the Project requirements including field of view; elimination of occlusion; site access for maintenance vehicles and personnel; access to pole mounted equipment, such as CCTV cameras, traffic detectors, and cabinets; and probability of lightning strike. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with roadway, structures, and drainage disciplines to confirm that the elevations are updated during various design phases, and the ITS poles and overhead structure details are revised and designed with the correct heights, lengths, foundation depths and sizes. 33.12 DMS Sign Panel Design Analysis The CONSULTANT shall design all ITS signing in conjunction with the Roadway Master Signing. This includes any static sign panel that includes changeable message elements. Expressway and arterial full size DMS shall not be co-located with other static signs. [If desired by the COUNTY]. 33.13 ITS Quantities for EQ Report The CONSULTANT shall determine ITS pay items and quantities and the supporting documentation. 33.14 Cost Estimate The CONSULTANT shall prepare an engineer's cost estimate for the project using historical data from the FDOT or from other Industry sources. The CONSULTANT shall also load the category information, pay items, and quantities into AASHTOWare Project Preconstruction. 33.15 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions The CONSULTANT shall develop Technical Special Provisions (TSP) and Modified Special Provisions (MSP) for the specific items or conditions of the project that are not addressed in the FDOT's Standard Specifications, Supplemental Specifications and Special Provisions. 33.16 Other ITS Analyses – N/A 33.17 Field Reviews The CONSULTANT shall conduct a field review for the required phase submittals. The review shall identify necessary data for all elements of the project including, but not limited to, the following:  Existing ITS Field Devices as compared with the latest FDOT standards and District requirements  Device Make, Model, Capabilities, Condition / Age, Existence of SunGuide Software Driver  Condition of Structure(s), cabinets, and other above-ground infrastructure and devices  Type of Detection as Compared with Current COUNTY Standards and preferences.  Underground Infrastructure  Proximity of other utilities Page 1220 of 5277  Traffic Operations  Any other field reconnaissance as necessary to develop a complete ITS design package 33.18 Technical Meetings The CONSULTANT shall attend meetings as necessary to support the project. 33.19 Quality Assurance / Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of designs, drawings, specifications, and other services and work furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. The CONSULTANT shall provide a Quality Control Plan that describes the procedures to be utilized to verify, independently check, and review all design drawings, specifications, and other documentation prepared as a part of the contract. The CONSULTANT shall describe how the checking and review processes are to be documented to verify that the required procedures were followed. The Quality Control Plan may be one utilized by the CONSULTANT as part of their normal operation or may be one specifically designed for this project. The CONSULTANT shall utilize the COUNTY’s quality control checklist. The responsible Professional Engineer that performed the Quality Control review shall sign a statement certifying that the review was conducted. The CONSULTANT shall, without additional compensation, correct all errors or deficiencies in their work. 33.20 Supervision The CONSULTANT shall provide all efforts required to supervise all technical design activities. 33.21 Coordination The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with Survey, Geotech, Drainage, Structures, Lighting, Roadway Design, Utilities, municipalities, maintaining agencies and Traffic Operations to produce a final set of construction contract documents and to ensure that a high degree of accuracy for the design plans is achieved. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the roadway Utility Adjustment Plan to incorporate all ITS support structural foundations symbols drawn to scale in the Utility Adjustment Plans and attend the utility design meetings conveying the information to all utility owners to preserve the location of the proposed foundations and avoid any conflicts. 34 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare a set of ITS Plans in accordance with the FDOT Design Manual that includes the following: 34.1 Key Sheet The CONSULTANT shall prepare the key sheet in accordance with the latest format depicted in the FDM, MUTCD, Standard Specifications, Developmental Specifications and Standard Plans 34.2 Tabulation of Quantities The CONSULTANT shall place pay item numbers, descriptions, quantities and grand totals on the tabulation sheet(s) and provide updating of the tabulation of quantities sheets during the design period. 34.3 General Notes / Pay Item Notes The CONSULTANT shall include all pertinent general notes and pay item notes as deemed fit and as established by the COUNTY. Page 1221 of 5277 34.4 Project Layout The CONSULTANT shall prepare plan sheet(s) with an overview of the entire project that include stations and offsets, project limits, intersection locations, ramps, railroads crossings, devices, device identification using SunGuide nomenclature, and plan sheet numbering and coverage. 34.5 Typical and Special Details The CONSULTANT shall prepare typical and / or special details for conditions in the project not addressed by the FDOT's Standard Plans for Design, Construction, Maintenance, and Utility Operations on the State Highway System. The CONSULTANT shall prepare special details not addressed by FDOT Standard Plans, including block diagrams, hub cabinets, wiring diagrams, solar power service, and special mounting details, horizontal directional drilling at critical crossings, wireless ethernet equipment for local and broadband communication, Ethernet based Blue Toad, Ramp Signaling System, RSU block diagrams, Power station site plan, Field Equipment Shelters for master hubs, electrical and communication conduit, equipment inside box girders. 34.6 Plan Sheet The CONSULTANT shall prepare the ITS plan sheets utilizing the Design file to include all necessary information related to the project design elements and all associated reference files. The plan sheets shall include general and pay item notes and pay items. The plans shall depict the location of ITS devices and cabinets, pull boxes, splice boxes, conduit runs, electrical service points, conduit, pull boxes, and conductors, and underground and overhead utilities, if applicable. Devices shall be located by station and offset as well as setback from the travel way. The CONSULTANT shall ensure the ITS sites and ground mounted cabinets locations are not in wetlands or wet drainage channels, do not interfere with protected species, meet the OSHA circle of safety from the overhead energized lines, and do not conflict with underground utilities. 34.7 ITS Communications Plans The CONSULTANT shall prepare plans for the communications network. These plans shall consist of block diagrams, splicing diagrams, port assignments, wiring diagrams, and all other information necessary to convey the design concept to the contractor. These plans shall be included in the ITS plan set and be prepared in a manner consistent with immediately adjacent ITS project installations (planned or installed). Communication plans shall include conduit, fiber, pull and splice boxes, ITS devices, communication lateral drops, fiber connection hardware, pay items etc. The communication system shall be an open-architecture, non-proprietary, real-time, multimedia communications network. The communication system design must be compatible and completely interoperable with the existing systems. The CONSULTANT's design shall include protecting and maintaining the existing ITS infrastructure. For locations where existing ITS infrastructure is impacted, the CONSULTANT's design shall include mitigation to minimize the downtime of existing system as per the COUNTY's requirements and prepare the Maintenance of Communication (MOC) plans. The CONSULTANT shall develop the MOC sheets for the project, providing temporary communications as necessary, notes, details, and direction applicable to the ITS elements and associated communications for inclusion in the MOC plans. The MOC plans shall include the notes, plan sheets, cross sections showing existing and proposed grades with the tables defining the stations limits for the conduit depths below existing and proposed grades for various construction phases. If applicable, the CONSULTANT shall review the roadway TTCP, drainage, structures, and landscaping plans and prepare the MOC plans for each construction phase. The MOC plans shall include construction phasing notes, half cross sections depicting existing and proposed grades, roadway templates, drainage ponds, flood mitigation zones, provide tables depicting the station range, location and depth of the proposed fiber optic trunk line below existing and proposed grades. The MOC plans shall optimize the reliable field-to-center (F2C) connectivity and operability of the ITS field devices previously deployed along the project corridor. The MOC design effort shall mitigate the impacts of the project's various construction phases so as to sustain center-to-field devices connectivity and operability, maintaining operational quality as a minimum at the level provided prior to construction start and minimizing down time as much as possible. In cases, where major alteration to the existing roadway begins in the areas where the existing ITS devices and underground communication will be impacted at the initial construction phase, the CONSULTANT shall include the permanent ITS and Page 1222 of 5277 communication and electrical power work to be constructed in the early phase and stage of the construction to activate the devices. The notes referencing the MOC plan details shall be included in the TTCP plans alerting the Contractor and emphasizing the importance of keeping the ITS devices operational. Subsequently, the CONSULTANT shall attend the utility design and pre-construction meeting conveying the importance of the MOC and operability of the overall system. The CONSULTANT shall include the MOC plan sheets in the beginning of the ITS plans. The CONSULTANT is responsible for the design of the communication infrastructure and its integration with the COUNTY's communication system. Additionally, the CONSULTANT shall determine the most cost effective, best performing, communication connectivity option. The communication system must allow command and control as well as data and video transmission between the field devices and the TMC. Conduit paths shall be selected to provide a continuous duct system on one side of the road unless otherwise requested by the COUNTY. The various components of ITS sites will be located on both sides of the freeway and therefore under pavement bore and lateral conduits will be necessary to access equipment locations. The CONSULTANT is responsible to locate the ITS sites so they are accessible by maintenance vans. 34.8 Fiber Optic Splice Diagrams The CONSULTANT shall produce fiber optic cable splicing diagrams to show the connectivity of the fiber optic cable from its termini at field devices to the TMC. The diagrams shall denote new and existing fiber routes, splices, and terminations involved in the work. The diagrams shall identify cables by size, tube color / number and stand colors / numbers. All cables shall be identified either by numbering system identified either by numbering system identified on the plans or by bounding devices. The diagrams shall denote the types of connectors in the patch panels. The CONSULTANT shall determine physical connection points and methods between the existing project limits to make the desired physical connection. The CONSULTANT shall determine and identify the Buffer Tube/Fiber and Ring allocation to maintain acceptable maximum number of the local intersection per ring before redundant ringing to a master communication hub and manage the transmission bandwidth. The CONSULTANT shall analyze existing and proposed fiber optic communication infrastructure for physical and logical connectivity into existing infrastructure. 34.9 Grounding and Lightning Protection Plans The CONSULTANT shall include efforts to design a complete and reliable lightning protection design for each pole and associated devices, ITS device installation, as well as device cabinets and communications hubs, etc. if not already addressed in the FDOT's Standard Plans for Design, Construction, Maintenance and Utility Operations on the State Highway System. Where the ITS site is located on viaducts and bridges, the CONSULTANT shall provide the grounding and lightning protection details in the plans and show the work that is integral to the elevated superstructure and substructure. 34.10 Cross Sections The CONSULTANT shall prepare cross sections for all ITS devices and support structures including the ground mounted cabinets or local hubs. The cross section shall include the underground and overhead utilities with utility relocation provisions. 34.11 Guide Sign Work Sheets The CONSULTANT shall prepare the guide sign work sheets to include all necessary information related to the design of the static and DMS, Embedded DMS, and DTBS in the project corridor. 34.12 Special Service Point Details The CONSULTANT shall design any special service point and electrical distribution system beyond the electric utility company's service point. The plan shall depict with pay items, general and plan notes the locations of transformers, switches, disconnects, conduits, pull boxes and power conductors. The plans shall identify the location of underground and overhead service points with identifying pole and transformer numbers. The CONSULTANT shall prepare the plan sheets depicting the electrical riser diagram and the line diagram for each location. Page 1223 of 5277 34.13 Strain Pole Schedule The CONSULTANT shall incorporate the schedule detail chart for concrete or steel strain poles in the plan set. The strain pole schedule details shall include stations, offsets, the ground elevations, proposed elevations, top of foundation elevation, all attachment tie-in heights, pole length, and embedment length. 34.14 Overhead / Cantilever Sign Structure The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for preparing the civil and structural plans of the overhead/cantilever structures, for proper installation of the DMS on the horizontal truss, viewing angle and decision site distance as per Chapter 2e - Guide Signs-Freeways and Expressways in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and Florida Department of Transportation FDOT Design Manual (FDM) and all other applicable manuals and guidelines as per governing regulations. The details shall include stations, offsets, the existing ground elevations, proposed elevations, top of drilled shaft foundation elevation, all attachment tie-in heights, upright length, and drilled shaft embedment length. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate the design with the roadway, structural, and MSE wall disciplines and cross reference the critical information on the respective plans for installation, routing of conduits for electrical power and communication inside the substructure and superstructure, and parapets and pilasters. In segments where concrete median barrier walls are proposed, The CONSULTANT shall coordinate the design with the roadway, drainage, and structural disciplines to design the drilled shafts integral to the barrier walls and minimizing the shoulder width reduction. 34.15 Other Overhead Sign Structures (Long Span, Monotube, etc.) The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for preparing the civil and structural plans when determining the requirements for other type of structures (long span, monotube, etc) used as part of the project for proper installation of the DMS, viewing angle and decision sight distance requirement as per AASHTO Green Book, Chapter 2e - Guide Signs-Freeways and Expressways in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and Florida Department of Transportation FDOT Design Manual (FDM) and all other applicable manuals and guidelines as per governing regulations. The details shall include stations, offsets, the existing ground elevations, proposed elevations, top of drilled shaft foundation elevation, all attachment tie-in heights, upright length, and drilled shaft diameter and embedment length. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate the design with the roadway, drainage, structural, and MSE wall disciplines and cross reference the critical information in the respective plans for installation, routing of conduits for electrical power and communication inside the substructure and superstructure, bridge deck, and parapets with pilasters. 34.16 Temporary Traffic Control Plans The CONSULTANT shall prepare Temporary Traffic Control Plans (TTCP) to minimize impact to traffic during the construction of ITS field devices and associated communications infrastructure that will be deployed along the project corridor. The TTCP shall strive to maintain and sustain center-to-field device connectivity and operability to the ITS field devices previously deployed along the project corridor. The TTCP effort shall consider and mitigate the impacts of the project's various construction phases so as to sustain center-to-field devices connectivity and operability, maintaining operational quality as a minimum at the level provided prior to construction start and minimizing down time as much as possible. The CONSULTANT shall develop the TTCP sheets for the project, providing temporary communications as necessary, notes, details, and direction applicable to the ITS elements and associated communications for inclusion in the TTCP. The CONSULTANT shall review the existing TMC Operations and develop additional incident management service requirements as necessary to support during the Construction Phase of the Project. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with COUNTY’s Traffic Operations for additional information regarding existing Incident Management and TMC Operational Procedures. 34.17 Interim Standards The CONSULTANT shall adhere to all COUNTY Interim Standards for ITS applications. Page 1224 of 5277 34.18 GIS Data and Asset Management Requirements The CONSULTANT is responsible for providing Geographic Information System (GIS), spatial data, for the ITS components design. This information is required to integrate ITS components to the SunGuide software. A coordinate point compatible with the Florida State Plane System or FDOT's current coordinate plane system shall be collected for all ITS components part of the Project design. All GIS information provided shall be compatible with the FDOT's ITS FM asset management software. The information shall be transferred to the as-built plans and submitted to the COUNTY in electronic format along with the as-built plans. The Global Positioning System (GPS) unit shall be provided by the CONSULTANT and used to collect data with a minimum accuracy of three (3) meters when differentially corrected. The CONSULTANT shall collect spatial data points and physical address location for:  DMS, Embedded DMS, ADMS, DTBS location (mainline and arterial)  Vehicle detection pole location  CCTV camera pole location  WWVDS sites  Ramp Signal system sites  RWIS locations  RSU sites  Ground mounted cabinets  Fiber optic cable path (fiber backbone)  Communications hubs  Standard route markers  Lateral fiber optic cable connections  Lateral power cable connections  Pull boxes (power and fiber)  Splice boxes  Power drops (service point and cable path)  Power station site equipment (Generator, Power Distribution, ITS Cabinet, Pad Mounted Transformers, power service pole) 34.19 Quality Assurance / Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall utilize the COUNTY’s quality control checklist for traffic design drawings in addition to the QC effort described in Section Three. 34.20 Supervision The CONSULTANT shall supervise all technical design activities. 35 GEOTECHNICAL The CONSULTANT shall, for each project, be responsible for a complete geotechnical investigation. All work performed by the CONSULTANT shall be in accordance with COUNTY and FDOT standards, or as otherwise directed by the COUNTY Project Manager. The COUNTY Project Manager will make interpretations and changes regarding geotechnical standards, policies and procedures and provide guidance to the CONSULTANT. Before beginning each phase of investigation and after the Notice to Proceed is given, the CONSULTANT shall submit an investigation plan for approval and meet with the COUNTY Project Manager or representative to review the project scope and COUNTY requirements. The investigation plan shall include, but not be limited to, the proposed boring locations and depths, and all existing geotechnical information from available sources to generally describe the surface and subsurface conditions of the project site. Additional meetings may be required to plan any additional field efforts, review plans, resolve plans/report comments, Page 1225 of 5277 resolve responses to comments, and/or any other meetings necessary to facilitate the project. The CONSULTANT shall notify the COUNTY in adequate time to schedule a representative to attend all related meetings and field activities. 35.1 Document Collection and Review CONSULTANT will review printed literature including topographic maps, county agricultural maps, aerial photography (including historic photos), ground water resources, geology bulletins, potentiometric maps, pile driving records, historic construction records and other geotechnical related resources. Prior to field reconnaissance, CONSULTANT shall review U.S.G.S., S.C.S. and potentiometric maps, and identify areas with problematic soil and groundwater conditions. Roadway The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for coordination of all geotechnical related field work activities. The CONSULTANT shall retain all samples until acceptance of Phase IV plans. Rock cores shall be retained as directed in writing by the COUNTY Project Manager. Obtain pavement cores as directed in writing by the COUNTY Project Manager. If required by the COUNTY Project Manager, a preliminary roadway exploration shall be performed before the Phase I plans submittal. The preliminary roadway exploration will be performed, and results provided to the Engineer of Record to assist in setting roadway grades and locating potential problem areas. The preliminary roadway exploration shall be performed as directed in writing by the COUNTY Project Manager. The CONSULTANT shall perform specialized field-testing in accordance with the FDOT Soils and Foundation Handbook and as required by project needs which may include but not be limited to:  Roadway auger borings every 100 feet to a depth of 6 feet.  LBR sampling and testing at 3 per mile.  Pavement core sampling and testing at 1 sample per 1,000 feet.  Corrosion series testing at sample per abundant stratum per 500 feet.  Buried storm sewer system SPT borings to a depth of 10 feet every 500 feet.  SPT borings on all corners of intersection for all new signals and/or mast arm to a depth of 25 feet.  Two corrosion series tests at each intersection location.  Four double-ring infiltrometer tests along drainage swales.  Two borehole permeability tests at each wet detention pond location.  Piezometer installations at 1 per pond for Seasonal High Groundwater Level (SHGWL) determinations.  Exfiltration test per 500 feet of exfiltration trench. All laboratory testing and classification will be performed in accordance with applicable COUNTY and FDOT standards, ASTM Standards or AASHTO Standards, unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents. 35.2 Develop Detailed Boring Location Plan Develop a detailed boring location plan. Meet with COUNTY Project Manager for boring plan approval. If the drilling program expects to encounter artesian conditions, the CONSULTANT shall submit a methodology(s) for plugging the borehole to the COUNTY for approval prior to commencing with the boring program. 35.3 Stake Borings/Utility Clearance Stake borings and obtain utility clearance. 35.4 Muck Probing Probe standing water and surficial muck in a detailed pattern sufficient for determining removal limits to be shown in the Page 1226 of 5277 Plans. 35.5 Coordinate and Develop TTCP for Field Investigation Coordinate and develop Temporary Traffic Control Plan (TTCP). All work zone traffic control will be performed in accordance with the FDOT Standard Plans Index 102 series. 35.6 Drilling Access Permits Obtain all State, County, City, and Water Management District permits for performing geotechnical borings, as needed. 35.7 Property Clearances Notify property tenants in person of drilling and field activities, if applicable. Written notification to property owners/tenants is the responsibility of the COUNTY's Project Manager. 35.8 Groundwater Monitoring Monitor groundwater, using piezometers. 35.9 LBR / Resilient Modulus Sampling Collect appropriate samples for Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) testing. 35.10 Coordination of Field Work Coordinate all field work required to provide geotechnical data for the project. 35.11 Soil and Rock Classification - Roadway Refine soil profiles recorded in the field, based on results of laboratory testing. 35.12 Design LBR Determine design LBR values from the 90% and mean methods when LBR testing is required by the COUNTY. 35.13 Laboratory Data Tabulate laboratory test results for inclusion in the geotechnical report, the report of tests sheet (Roadway Soil Survey Sheet), and for any necessary calculations and analyses. 35.14 Seasonal High Water Table Review the encountered ground water levels and estimate seasonal high ground water levels. Estimate seasonal low ground water levels, if requested. 35.15 Parameters for Water Retention Areas Calculate parameters for water retention areas, exfiltration trenches, and/or swales. 35.16 Delineate Limits of Unsuitable Material Delineate limits of unsuitable material(s) in both horizontal and vertical directions. Assist the Engineer of Record with detailing these limits on the cross-sections. If requested, prepare a plan view of the limits of unsuitable material. Page 1227 of 5277 35.17 Electronic Files for Cross-Sections Create electronic files of boring data for cross-sections. 35.18 Embankment Settlement and Stability Estimate the total magnitude and time rate of embankment settlements. Calculate the factor of safety against slope stability failure. 35.19 Monitor Existing Structures Provide Roadway EOR guidance on the radius to review existing structures for monitoring. Optional services (may be negotiated at a later date if needed): Identify existing structures in need of settlement, vibration and/or groundwater monitoring by the contractor during construction and coordinate with the EOR and structural engineer (when applicable) to develop mitigation strategies. When there is risk of damage to the structure or facility, provide recommendations in the geotechnical report addressing project specific needs and coordinate those locations with the EOR. See FDM Chapter 117 and Chapter 9 of the Soils and Foundations Handbook. 35.20 Stormwater Volume Recovery and/or Background Seepage Analysis Perform stormwater volume recovery analysis as directed by the COUNTY. 35.21 Geotechnical Recommendations Provide geotechnical recommendations regarding the proposed roadway construction project including the following: description of the site/alignment, design recommendations and discussion of any special considerations (e.g. removal of unsuitable material, consolidation of weak soils, estimated settlement time/amount, groundwater control, high groundwater conditions relative to pavement base, etc.) Evaluate and recommend types of geosynthetics and properties for various applications, as required. 35.22 Pavement Condition Survey and Pavement Evaluation Report If a pavement evaluation is performed, submit the report in accordance with Section 3.2 of the Materials Manual: Flexible Pavement Coring and Evaluation. Enter all core information into the Pavement Coring and Reporting (PCR) system. 35.23 Preliminary Roadway Report If a preliminary roadway investigation is performed, submit a preliminary roadway report before the Phase I plans submittal. The purpose of the preliminary roadway report will be to assist in setting road grades and locating potential problems.  Copies of U.S.G.S. and S.C.S. maps with project limits shown.  A report of tests sheet that summarizes the laboratory test results, the soil stratification (i.e. soils grouped into layers of similar materials) and construction recommendations relative to Standard Plans Indices 120-001 and 120-002.  The results of all tasks discussed in all previous sections regarding data interpretation and analysis.  An appendix that contains stratified soil boring profiles, laboratory test data sheets, sample embankment settlement and stability calculations, design LBR calculation/graphs, and other pertinent calculations.  The CONSULTANT will respond in writing to any changes and/or comments from the COUNTY and submit any responses and revised reports. 35.24 Final Report The Final Roadway Report shall include the following:  Copies of U.S.G.S. and S.C.S. maps with project limits shown. Page 1228 of 5277  A report of tests sheet that summarizes the laboratory test results, the soil stratification (i.e. soils grouped into layers of similar materials) and construction recommendations relative to Standard Plans Indices 120-001 and 120-002.  The results of all tasks discussed in all previous sections regarding data interpretation and analysis.  An appendix that contains stratified soil boring profiles, laboratory test data sheets, sample embankment settlement and stability calculations, design LBR calculation/graphs, and other pertinent calculations.  The CONSULTANT will respond in writing to any changes and/or comments from the COUNTY and submit any responses and revised reports. 35.25 Auger Boring Drafting Draft auger borings as directed by the COUNTY. 35.26 SPT Boring Drafting Draft SPT borings as directed by the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for coordination of all geotechnical related fieldwork activities. The CONSULTANT shall retain all samples until acceptance of Phase IV plans. Rock cores shall be retained as directed in writing by the District Geotechnical Engineer. CONSULTANT shall perform specialized field-testing as required by needs of project and as directed in writing by the COUNTY Project Manager. All laboratory testing and classification will be performed in accordance with applicable COUNTY and FDOT standards, ASTM Standards or AASHTO Standards, unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents. The staff hour tasks for high embankment fills and structural foundations for bridges, box culverts, walls, high-mast lighting, overhead signs, mast arm signals, strain poles, buildings, and other structures include the following: 35.27 Develop Detailed Boring Location Plan Develop a detailed boring location plan. Meet with COUNTY Project Manager for boring plan approval. If the drilling program expects to encounter artesian conditions, the CONSULTANT shall submit a methodology(s) for plugging the borehole to the COUNTY for approval prior to commencing with the boring program. 35.28 Stake Borings/Utility Clearance Stake borings and obtain utility clearance. 35.29 Coordinate and Develop TTCP for Field Investigation Coordinate and develop TTCP plan. All work zone traffic control will be performed in accordance with the FDOT's Standard Plans Index 102 series. 35.30 Drilling Access Permits Obtain all State, County, City, and Water Management District permits for performing geotechnical borings, as needed. 35.31 Property Clearances Notify property tenants in person of drilling and field activities, if applicable. Written notification to property owners/tenants is the responsibility of the COUNTY Project Manager. 35.32 Collection of Corrosion Samples Collect corrosion samples for determination of environmental classifications. Page 1229 of 5277 35.33 Coordination of Field Work Coordinate all field work required to provide geotechnical data for the project. 35.34 Soil and Rock Classification - Structures Soil profiles recorded in the field should be refined based on the results of laboratory testing. 35.35 Tabulation of Laboratory Data Laboratory test results should be tabulated for inclusion in the geotechnical report and for the necessary calculations and analyses. 35.36 Estimate Design Groundwater Level for Structures Review encountered groundwater levels, estimate seasonal high groundwater levels, and evaluate groundwater levels for structure design. 35.37 Selection of Foundation Alternatives (BDR) Evaluation and selection of foundation alternative, including the following:  GRS-IBS  Spread footings  Prestressed concrete piling - various sizes  Steel H- piles  Steel pipe piles  Drilled shafts  Foundation analyses shall be performed using approved COUNTY and FDOT methods. Assist in selection of the most economical, feasible foundation alternative. 35.38 Detailed Analysis of Selected Foundation Alternate(s) Detailed analysis and basis for the selected foundation alternative. Foundation analyses shall be performed using approved COUNTY methods and shall include:  GRS-IBS (including the parameters identified in the Instructions for Developmental Design Standard D6025 to be provided by the Geotechnical Engineer)  Spread footings (including soil bearing capacity, minimum footing width, and minimum embedment depth).  For pile and drilled shaft foundations, provide graphs of ultimate axial soil resistance versus tip elevations. Calculate scour resistance and/or downdrag (negative skin friction), if applicable.  CONSULTANT shall assist the Engineer of Record in preparing the Pile Data Table (including test pile lengths, scour resistance, downdrag, minimum tip elevation, etc.)  Provide the design soil profile(s), which include the soil model/type of each layer and all soil-engineering properties required for the Engineer of Record to run the FBPier computer program. Review lateral analysis of selected foundation for geotechnical compatibility.  Estimated maximum driving resistance anticipated for pile foundations.  Provide settlement analysis. 35.39 Bridge Construction and Testing Recommendations Provide construction and testing recommendations including potential constructability problems. Page 1230 of 5277 35.40 Lateral Load Analysis (Optional) Perform lateral load analyses as directed by the COUNTY. 35.41 Walls Provide the design soil profile(s), which include the soil model/type of each layer and all soil engineering properties required by the Engineer of Record for conventional wall analyses and recommendations. Review wall design for geotechnical compatibility and constructability. Evaluate the external stability of conventional retaining walls and retained earth wall systems. For retained earth wall systems, calculate and provide minimum soil reinforcement lengths versus wall heights, and soil parameters assumed in analysis. Estimate differential and total (long term and short term) settlements. Provide wall construction recommendations. 35.42 Sheet Pile Wall Analysis (Optional) Analyze sheet pile walls as directed by the COUNTY. 35.43 Design Soil Parameters for Signs, Signals, High Mast Lights, and Strain Poles and Geotechnical Recommendations  Provide the design soil profile(s) that include the soil model/type of each layer and all soil properties required by the Engineer of Record for foundation design. Review design for geotechnical compatibility and constructability. 35.44 Box Culvert Analysis  Provide the design soil profile(s) that include the soil model/type of each layer and all soil properties required by the Engineer of Record for foundation design. Review design for geotechnical compatibility and constructability.  Provide lateral earth pressure coefficients.  Provide box culvert construction and design recommendations.  Estimate differential and total (long term and short term) settlements.  Evaluate wingwall stability. 35.45 Preliminary Report - BDR The preliminary structures report shall contain the following discussions as appropriate for the assigned project:  Copies of U.S.G.S. and S.C.S. maps with project limits shown.  Summary of structure background data, S.C.S., U.S.G.S., geologic and potentiometric data.  The results of all tasks discussed in all previous sections regarding data interpretation and analysis).  Recommendations for foundation installation, or other site preparation soils-related construction considerations with plan sheets as necessary.  Any special provisions required for construction that are not addressed in the FDOT's Standard Specifications.  An Appendix which includes SPT and CPT boring/sounding profiles, data from any specialized field tests, engineering analysis, notes/sample calculations, sheets showing ultimate bearing capacity curves versus elevation for piles and drilled shafts, a complete FHWA check list, pile driving records (if available), and any other pertinent information. 35.46 Final Report - Bridge and Associated Walls The final structures report shall include the following:  Copies of U.S.G.S. and S.C.S. maps with project limits shown.  Summary of structure background data, S.C.S., U.S.G.S., geologic and potentiometric data. Page 1231 of 5277  The results of all tasks discussed in all previous sections regarding data interpretation and analysis.  Recommendations for foundation installation, or other site preparation soils-related construction considerations with plan sheets as necessary.  Any special provisions required for construction that are not addressed in the FDOT’s Standard Specifications.  An Appendix which includes SPT and CPT boring/sounding profiles, data from any specialized field tests, engineering analysis, notes/sample calculations, sheets showing ultimate bearing capacity curves versus elevation for piles and drilled shafts, a complete FHWA check list, pile driving records (if available), and any other pertinent information. 35.47 Final Reports - Signs, Signals, Box Culvert, Walls, and High Mast Lights The final reports shall include the following:  Copies of U.S.G.S. and S.C.S. maps with project limits shown.  Summary of structure background data, S.C.S., U.S.G.S., geologic and potentiometric data.  The results of all tasks discussed in all previous sections regarding data interpretation and analysis).  Recommendations for foundation installation, or other site preparation soils-related construction considerations with plan sheets as necessary.  Any special provisions required for construction that are not addressed in the FDOT's Standard Specifications.  An Appendix which includes SPT and CPT boring/sounding profiles, data from any specialized field tests, engineering analysis, notes/sample calculations, sheets showing ultimate bearing capacity curves versus elevation for piles and drilled shafts, a complete FHWA check list, pile driving records (if available), and any other pertinent information. Final reports will incorporate comments from the COUNTY and contain any additional field or laboratory test results, recommended foundation alternatives along with design parameters and special provisions for the contract plans. These reports will be submitted to the COUNTY Project Manager for review prior to project completion. After review by the COUNTY the reports will be submitted to the COUNTY Project Manager in final form and will include the following:  All original plan sheets (11" x 17")  One set of all plan and specification documents, in electronic format, according to COUNTY requirements  Two sets of record prints  Six sets of any special provisions  All reference and support documentation used in preparation of contract plans package Additional final reports (up to four), aside from stated above, may be needed and requested for the COUNTY Project Manager and other disciplines. The final reports, special provisions, as well as record prints, will be signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Florida. Draft the detailed boring/sounding standard sheet, including environmental classification, results of laboratory testing, and specialized construction requirements, for inclusion in final plans. 35.48 SPT Boring Drafting Prepare a complete set of drawings to include all SPT borings, auger borings and other pertinent soils information in the plans. Include these drawings in the Final Geotechnical Report. Draft borings, location map, S.C.S. map and U.S.D.A. map as directed by the COUNTY. Soil symbols must be consistent with those presented in the latest Florida Department of Transportation Soils and Foundations Handbook. 35.49 Other Geotechnical Other geotechnical effort specifically required for the project as determined by the COUNTY and included in the geotechnical upset limit. 35.50 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions Page 1232 of 5277 35.51 Field Reviews Identify and note surface soil and rock conditions, surface water conditions and locations, and preliminary utility conflicts. Observe and note nearby structures and foundation types. 35.52 Technical Meetings 35.53 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 35.54 Supervision 35.55 Coordination 36 3D MODELING The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Roadway Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. The CONSULTANT shall deliver all master design files, 3D surface design models, and all supporting digital files for the development of plans as required in the FDOT CADD Manual. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a 3D model using the latest FDOT software in accordance with the FDOT CADD Manual. Includes all efforts required for developing files for 3D deliverables supporting automated machine guidance for design models. This includes importing survey data and creation of existing 3D surface features and models and developing proposed corridor models with necessary detail of features to depict the proposed project in 3D to comply with the FDOT CADD Manual. The CONSULTANT shall add detail to the corridor and design model for 3D design. Includes many elements that contribute to this including but not limited to slope transitions, typical section transitions, changes in pavement depth, berms, swales/ditches, and other feature transitions. Extra corridor structure leads to extra assemblies, extra targeting, etc. The CONSULTANT shall create an accurate roadway design model which includes modeling the intersections. The CONSULTANT shall submit .dgn files associated with the 3D Model and their respective components. 36.1 Phase I 3D Design Model The CONSULTANT shall prepare, submit and present for review by the COUNTY, Phase I 3D interactive model, comprised of, but not limited to: Existing features (pavement, shoulders, sidewalk, curb/gutter, utilities-if required per scope, drainage - if required per scope) and proposed corridor(s). 36.2 Phase II 3D Design Model The CONSULTANT shall prepare, submit and present for review by the COUNTY, Phase II 3D model, comprised of, but not limited to: Modification of the Phase I model to update the model to comply with changes based on the Phase I review comments and to include the addition of ponds, floodplain compensation sites, retaining walls, barrier walls, guardrail terminals, cross overs, gore areas, side street connections, roundabouts, and driveways. [List optional services to be included, e.g. 3D deliverables files for review, Curb Ramps, Closed Drainage Network, Bridge Modeling, Bridge Abutment, Overhead sign post/structures with foundation, Toll gantry and overhead DMS structures with foundation, proposed utilities (pressure pipe/gravity), etc.]. 36.3 Phase III 3D Design Model The CONSULTANT shall prepare, submit and present for review by the COUNTY, Phase III 3D model and 3D deliverables files for review, comprised of, but not limited to: Modification of the Phase II model to update the model to comply with changes based on the Phase II review comments and to further refine areas of transition between templates, detailed grading Page 1233 of 5277 areas, bridge approaches and end bents, median noses, shoulder transition areas, retaining walls, barrier walls and guardrail. 36.4 Final 3D Model Design The CONSULTANT shall prepare for review by COUNTY, the Phase IV 3D model and deliverables, comprised of, but not limited to: Modification of the Phase III model to update the model to comply with changes based on the phase III review comments and to accurately generate, export and otherwise prepare the final 3D deliverable files as described in the FDOT CADD Manual. 36.5 Cross Section Design Files The CONSULTANT shall establish and develop cross section design files in accordance with the FDOT CADD manual and FDOT Design Manual. Includes all work required to establish and utilize intelligent/automated methods for creating cross sections including determining the locations for which all cross sections will be shown, existing and proposed features, cross section refinement, placement of utilities and drainage, soil boxes, R/W lines, earthwork calculations, and other required labeling. 36.6 Template and Assembly Development (Optional) The CONSULTANT shall prepare for approval by COUNTY, project specific templates/assemblies needed to develop the features required to deliver the 3D model. 36.7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 36.8 Supervision 36.9 Coordination 37 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS 37.1 Liaison Office The COUNTY and the CONSULTANT will designate a Liaison Office and a Project Manager who shall be the representative of their respective organizations for the Project. While it is expected the CONSULTANT shall seek and receive advice from various state, regional, and local agencies, the final direction on all matters of this project remains with the COUNTY Project Manager. 37.2 Key Personnel The CONSULTANT's work shall be performed and directed by the key personnel identified in the proposal presentations by the CONSULTANT. Any changes in the indicated personnel shall be subject to review and approval by COUNTY. 37.3 Progress Reporting The CONSULTANT shall meet with the COUNTY as required and shall provide a written monthly progress report with approved schedule, schedule status, and payout curve or by using the earned value method that describe the work performed on each task. The report will include assessing project risk through monthly documentation of identifying and updating the risk category and approach for monitoring those tasks. Invoices shall be submitted after the COUNTY approves the monthly progress report and the payout curve or with earned value analysis. The COUNTY Project Manager will make judgment on whether work of sufficient quality and quantity has been accomplished by comparing the reported percent complete against actual work accomplished. 37.4 Correspondence Copies of all written correspondence between the CONSULTANT and any party pertaining specifically to this contract shall be provided to the COUNTY for their records within one (1) week of the receipt or mailing of said correspondence. Page 1234 of 5277 37.5 Professional Endorsement The CONSULTANT shall have a Licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Florida sign and seal all reports, documents, Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions, and plans as required by COUNTY standards. 37.6 Computer Automation The project will be developed utilizing Computer Aided Drafting and Design (CADD) systems. It is the responsibility of the CONSULTANT to meet the requirements in the FDOT CADD Manual. The CONSULTANT shall submit final documents and files as described therein. The CONSULTANT shall submit all required plan submittals (60%, 90% & 100%) in CADD format. 37.7 Coordination with Other Consultants The CONSULTANT is to coordinate his work with any and all adjacent and integral consultants so as to effect complete and homogenous plans and specifications for the project(s) described herein. 37.8 Optional Services At the COUNTY's option, the CONSULTANT may be requested to provide optional services. The fee for these services shall be negotiated in accordance with the terms detailed in the resultant agreement, for a fair, competitive and reasonable cost, considering the scope and complexity of the project(s). Additional services may be authorized by Change Order or supplemental amendment in accordance with paragraph 2.00 of the Standard Consultant Agreement. The additional services may include Construction Assistance, Review of Shop Drawings, Final Bridge Load Rating, update (Category II) bridge plans electronically (CADD) for the Final "As-Built" conditions, based on documents provided by the DEPARTMENT (CADD Services Only) or other Services as required. RESPONSE FORMAT AND SCORING CRITERIA FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SHORTLIST: Proposals must be assembled, at minimum, in the order of the Evaluation Criteria listed or your proposal may be deemed non-responsive Evaluation Criteria Maximum Points 1. Ability of Professional Personnel 20 Points 2. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 5 Points 3. Past Performance 25 Points 4. Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements 20 Points 5. Location 10 Points 6. Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm 20 Points TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS 100 Points For complete explanation of each evaluation criteria, please see the file titled “RPS Instructions” included with this advertisement. VENDOR CHECKLIST ***Vendor should check off each of the following items as the necessary action is completed (please see, Vendor Check List)**** Page 1235 of 5277 Notice of Recommended Award Solicitation: 24-8313 Title: Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext Due Date and Time: November 18, 2024, at 3:00 PM EST Respondents: Company Name City County State Final Ranking Responsive/Responsible Jacobs Engineering Group Inc Naples Collier County FL 1 YES/YES Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Naples Collier County FL 2 YES/YES Patel, Greene and Associates, LLC Temple Terrace Hillsborough County FL 3 YES/YES DRMP, Inc. Orlando Orange County FL Not Ranked YES/YES LJA Engineering, Inc. Naples Collier County FL Not Ranked YES/YES Utilized Local Vendor Preference: Yes No On October 17th, 2024, the Procurement Services Division released notices for Request for Professional Services (RPS) No. 24-8313, “Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext,” to two thousand four hundred and forty-two (2,442) vendors. One thousand one hundred and fifty-three (1,153) firms viewed the solicitation information, and five (5) proposals were received by the November 18, 2024, submission deadline. Staff reviewed the proposals received and found all five (5) firms to be responsive and responsible, with DRMP, Inc. having a minor irregularity. The Selection Committee convened on January 8th, 2025, and as described in step 1 of the solicitation documents, the committee scored each of the proposals and shortlisted three (3) firms to move to step 2 in the order listed below: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Patel, Greene and Associates, LLC On January 27th, 2025, the Selection Committee reconvened for step 2 presentations, and ranked the firms as shown above. Staff is recommending negotiations with the top ranked firm, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Contract Driven Purchase Order Driven Docusign Envelope ID: CE788EF8-9CD5-47AA-AEDD-D19D062DBBE6 Page 1236 of 5277 Required Signatures Project Manager: Procurement Strategist: Procurement Services Director: __________________________________ _________________ Sandra Srnka Date Docusign Envelope ID: CE788EF8-9CD5-47AA-AEDD-D19D062DBBE6 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 Page 1237 of 5277 Selection Committee Final Ranking Sheet RPS #: 24-8313 Title: 24-8313 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext Name of Firm Robert White Ray Girgis Bee Thao Anthony Stolts Andrew Miller Total Selection Committee Final Rank Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.1 1 2 1 1 6 1.0000 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.3 2 1 2 2 10 2.0000 Patel, Greene and Associates, LLC 2 3 3 3 3 14 3.0000 Procurement Professional Matthew Webster Date 1/27/2025 Step 1: Upon direction by the Procurement professional, the individual selection committee member should provide their ranking of the proposals (from highest being number one (1) to lowest. Step 2: The procurement professional will review the mathematically calculated final rank and call out the final rank order. Page 1238 of 5277 County of Collier, FL Procurement -, - 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 [JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT GEN No. 24-8313 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext RESPONSE DEADLINE: November 18, 2024 at 3:00 pm Report Generated: Monday, November 18, 2024 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Response CONTACT INFORMATION Company: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Email: bill.gramer@jacobs.com Contact: Bill Gramer Address: 5811 Pelican Bay Blvd. Suite 305 Naples, FL 34108 Phone: (239) 860-4922 Website: www.jacobs.com Submission Date: Nov 18, 2024 1:31 PM (Eastern Time) Page 1239 of 5277 [JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT GEN No. 24-8313 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext [JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT undefined - Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext Page 2 ADDENDA CONFIRMATION No addenda issued QUESTIONNAIRE 1. I certify that I have read, understood and agree to the terms in this solicitation, and that I am authorized to submit this r esponse on behalf of my company.* Confirmed 2. Request for Professional Services (RPS) Instructions Form * Request for Professional Services (RPS) Instructions have been acknowledged and accepted. Confirmed 3. Collier County Purchase Order Terms and Conditions* Collier County Purchase Order Terms and Conditions have been acknowledged and accepted. Confirmed 4. Insurance Requirements* Vendor Acknowledges Insurance Requirement and is prepared to produce the required insurance certificate(s) within five (5) da ys of the County's issuance of a Notice of Recommended Award. Confirmed 5. Collier County Required Forms PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL* Page 1240 of 5277 [JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT GEN No. 24-8313 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext [JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT undefined - Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext Page 3 Please submit a proposal per Evaluation Criteria outlined in Solicitation. RPS_24-8313_-_Design_Services_for_Everglades_Blvd_Widening_from_Oil_Well_Rd_to_Vanderbilt_Beach_Rd_Ext_Jacobs.pdf VENDOR CHECK LIST* Vendor_Checklist.pdf VENDOR DECLARATION STATEMENT (FORM 1)* Form_1.pdf CONFLICT OF INTEREST AFFIDAVIT (FORM 2)* Form_2.pdf IMMIGRATION LAW AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATION (FORM 3)* Form_3.pdf LOCAL VENDOR PREFERENCE CERTIFICATION (FORM 4) Form_4.pdf REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE (FORM 5)* The County requests that the vendor submits no fewer than three (3) and no more than ten (10) completed reference forms from clients whose projects are of a similar nature to this solicitation as a part of their proposal. Provide information on the projects completed by the Proposer that best represent projects of similar size, scope and complexity of this project using form provided in Form 5. Proposer may include two (2) additional pages for each project to illustrate aspects of the completed project that provides the PSC information to assess the experience of the Proposer on relevant project work. Form_5.pdf E-VERIFY - MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING* Jacobs_E-Verify_MOU.pdf W-9 FORM* W9_Form.pdf Page 1241 of 5277 [JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT GEN No. 24-8313 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext [JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT undefined - Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext Page 4 PROOF OF STATUS FROM DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE (SUNBIZ)* http://dos.myflorida.com/sunbiz/ should be attached with your submittal. Sunbiz.pdf SIGNED ADDENDUMS (IF APPLICABLE) No response submitted MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENTS Final_Forms_-_Combined.pdf Page 1242 of 5277 Page 1243 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page i COVER LETTER Dear Selection Committee Members: To successfully complete the Everglades Boulevard Widening Design, the Collier County Transportation Engineering Division (County) needs to partner with a proven, local team of consultants with a comprehensive understanding of the required roadway design elements, bicycle and pedestrian needs, CCPS infrastructure, existing and proposed site conditions, proposed development, access management, constructability issues, needed utility relocations, drainage requirements, and “Critical Path” schedule items such as Permitting and ROW acquisition. Jacobs is that team! As documented in the Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan, the Collier MPO 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan (Draft), the Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road Corridor Study, the Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study, and the Everglades Boulevard Interchange Justification Report, the widening of Everglades Boulevard is a key component of the County’s future plans to improve the overall traffic network and system connectivity in Golden Gate Estates and the eastern Collier County area. Everglades Boulevard will be the first four-lane north-south roadway east of Wilson Boulevard and will improve mobility and connectivity along the corridor and within the area. The future Everglades Boulevard will need to accommodate more than 44,000 (AADT) vehicles north of Randall Boulevard, and nearly 30,000 (AADT) vehicles south of Randall Boulevard once the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (VBRX) is constructed (per latest Florida Department of Transportation [FDOT] District 1 Traffic Model). This design project should not only consider the future intersection of VBRX Phase II along its corridor, but also the future Randall Boulevard Widening project and the future Oil Well Road Widening Project.Jacobs has unique and specific experience along all these corridors, including Everglades Boulevard (See Section 3)! It is crucial that the County’s consultant team understands the complexities associated with these intertwining network projects, as well as the many associated design, permitting, and construction challenges associated with Everglades Boulevard. As shown in the above typical section, the Everglades Boulevard Widening project is very similar to the Wilson Boulevard Widening project, that Jacobs is currently designing. Based on our direct project experience with not only the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study and Design, as well as all projects shown in Section 3 Past Performance, Jacobs has an exceptional understanding of this project’s unique needs and is ready to help the County deliver this project efficiently and effectively. The 2- lane to 4-lane widening will require significant ROW (easement) for the typical section, as well as the pond sites required for stormwater treatment and attenuation, and floodplain impact compensation.Note:The proposed 10’ pathway (not in RPS) is shown since the latest FDOT SUN Trail Network route is currently proposing Everglades Boulevard as the north-south connection from Vanderbilt Beach Road to Oil Well Road. The FDOT SUN Trail Network project (FDIP 455291-1-22-01) is currently in the procurement process. Our team, led by Project Manager (PM) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP, has full access to all the staff resources required to deliver the Everglades Boulevard Widening Design project. Bill has 37 years of transportation planning, design, and construction experience and has managed or coordinated 15 of our firm’s major Collier County roadway projects and 15 general service Contracts. Bill will be your primary point of contact, and he’ll leverage his experience delivering County projects with aggressive schedules and stakeholder coordination challenges to lead our talented, multi-firm team in advancing November 18, 2024 Matthew Webster Procurement Strategist Procurement Services Division 3295 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg. C-2 Naples, FL 34112 Subject: RPS No.: 24-8313 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext Our team members have already evaluated the project and identified recommended improvements to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes, while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. These recommendations will maximize operational efficiency, improve constructability, minimize impacts, reduce costs, and expedite permitting!Our team’s experience, particularly from the similar Wilson Boulevard Widening project, will help streamline our approach to this project and will expedite alternatives analyses of the horizontal and vertical alignments of the roadway, stormwater/pond siting requirements, ROW (easement) needs, and permitting. Page 1244 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page ii COVER LETTER the design to construction while minimizing County effort. Your staff knows Bill as a proactive client service manager who has been 100% dedicated to Collier County for the last 25 years! Bill combines the best of planning, design, and construction—a combination that is hard to match. He meets all the stated requirements in your Request for Professional Services (RPS), including knowledge and experience with current construction and regulatory conditions, good communication skills with a strong commitment to team collaboration, and successful delivery of contract documents in accordance with FDOT and County policies, procedures, and requirements. Nick De Ciccio, PE, will be Bill’s Deputy PM and lead the project’s community outreach. The Jacobs team is certified with FDOT in all required work groups for this project. Supporting Jacobs on this project are six subconsultants that bring specialized expertise and recent, relevant experience working with both Jacobs and the County: Johnson Engineering, Capital Consulting Solutions (CCS), Environmental Science Associates (ESA), Archaeological & Historical Conservancy (AHC), Ardaman & Associates, and I.F. Rooks & Associates. Jacobs has previously worked with each of these firms, and they are a perfect complement to our team from both a professional and personal perspective. These firms bring specialized skills and relevant knowledge of both the County and the project area. Our team’s understanding of the history behind this project and the planned development within the area means no time or money is wasted re-evaluating or pursing alternatives that have already been deemed non-feasible or that don’t conform to the needs and desires of the County and many project stakeholders. Unique features that set Jacobs apart Our team offers world-renowned planning, engineering, and construction expertise, a strong local presence, a multi-disciplined in-house team, and directly applicable local experience. Extensive design experience on roadway widening projects on Everglades Boulevard (4-Lane and 6-Lane concepts) and around the project area, including Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension and Oil Well Road. Provides the County access to the in-house expertise of professionals who have designed and built more than a dozen major roadway widening projects in Collier County. Proximity to County offices and project site result in highest level of responsive, on-demand service. Our Naples office, less than 15 minutes from the County offices and less than 30 minutes from the project site, serves as the principal and coordinating office. Many staff live within the Golden Gate Estates area. Our team members have decades of experience successfully delivering projects for Collier County and offers the County the right mix and level of expertise required, which allows for a cost-effective delivery of services. Our team has also conducted comprehensive field work and data collection (i.e., GIS survey, utility information, field photos, and aerial photos) to prepare for this proposal. We’ve reviewed all relevant project documentation and researched project issues, including access management, drainage, right-of-way and easements, developer agreements, and required permits. Our team will ensure this project is designed properly, so that it is constructible, and functions safely and efficiently. Our Public Involvement Plan will build consensus from the local residential community and other stakeholders. Our team offers world-renowned planning, engineering, and construction expertise, a strong local presence, a multi- disciplinary in-house team, and directly applicable local experience. Jacobs is uniquely positioned to deliver this project on time and within budget, with your goals in mind. Our team members are committed to serving you on the Everglades Boulevard Widening Design project throughout the duration of this contract. We look forward to continuing to partner with the County and help you achieve your goals and visions for our community. If you have any questions or require additional information, contact me at 239.860.4922 or Bill.Gramer@jacobs.com.Our team stands ready to begin work immediately! Sincerely, Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Project Manager - Jacobs Nick has previously served as the Deputy PM for the Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening Project and Collier Boulevard Widening III Phase II Project and has been instrumental in the successful coordination and completion of these projects. Page 1245 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 1-1 Evaluation Criteria No. 1 Ability of Professional Personnel 2-1 Evaluation Criteria No. 2 Certified Minority Business Enterprise 3-1 Evaluation Criteria No. 3 Past Performance 4-1 Evaluation Criteria No. 4 Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements 5-1 Evaluation Criteria No. 5 Location 6-1 Evaluation Criteria No. 6 Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm A-1 Appendix A Required Forms B-1 Appendix B Licenses C-1 Appendix C Resumes Page 1246 of 5277 Page 1247 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 1 - 1 1. ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL Since 1977, Collier County (County) has consistently relied upon our team to provide planning, design, permitting, and construction management services on a multitude of roadway, utility, site-civil and permitting projects. Our long- term partnership has helped our Naples-based staff develop a thorough understanding of local conditions, existing infrastructure, County requirements, Agency criteria, and stakeholder concerns. We have more than 30 years of experience delivering projects in the County, and we are familiar with your organization and preferred project delivery process. Our Naples team understands the critical elements necessary to successfully deliver the Everglades Boulevard Widening Design project and ensure that it complies with all applicable design standards.Our team is pre-qualified with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) in all required work groups for this project. Our Subconsultant Partners “Preference will be given to companies making up the team that have worked together on delivery of similar projects.” We have assembled a team of trusted subconsultant partners to deliver this project. Leveraging our proven track record of collaborating to deliver County projects and drawing on each firm’s unique strengths, we will identify cost-feasible and technically sound solutions for the Everglades Boulevard Widening Design with a focus on solutions that will gain agency and public consensus quickly. Jacobs has worked with each of these firms on numerous Collier County Transportation projects. Johnson Engineering, Inc.will provide all required survey/SUE/right-of-way (ROW) services and assist with utility and environmental tasks. Johnson Engineering provides a wide variety of engineering services for transportation design, utility improvements, environmental permitting, land development, land planning, landscape architecture, and construction observation and inspection. Their surveying and mapping group specializes in subsurface utility location and mapping or subsurface utility exploration (SUE), transportation surveying, hydrographic surveying, and geographic information systems (GIS). Johnson Engineering has provided services on many projects in the County, including work on Livingston Road. Jacobs and Johnson Engineering have worked together on many varied projects throughout Florida, including multiple County projects.We recently worked together on the Wilson Boulevard Widening Project, Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study, Wilson Boulevard Wellhouse & Infrastructure Improvements Project, Pine Ridge Road Corridor Improvements, Tamiami Wellfield Wilson Boulevard Widening Impact Study, Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening, Lake Trafford Road Improvements, and Collier Boulevard III Widening Projects. Capital Consulting Solutions (CCS) (MBE)will provide support for data collection, maintenance of traffic (MOT), and public outreach. CCS brings local knowledge and relationships with a variety of Southwest Florida stakeholders, including Collier County, Collier MPO, Lee County, Lee County MPO, FDOT District One, and the City of Bonita Springs. CCS has worked side-by-side with our Naples-based staff on multiple projects, including many County General Services Contracts, FDOT LAP projects, Wilson Boulevard Widening, and Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening. CCS is a Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) firm based in Collier County, and its founder Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP, CGC, has direct experience on County roadways, including Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening, Collier Boulevard, and Tree Farm Road. Environmental Science Associates (ESA)will conduct noise studies for this project. An environmental consulting and planning firm committed to sustainability principles, ESA brings more than 50 years of experience in all aspects of project planning, environmental assessment, natural resource management, and regulatory compliance. ESA has 30 years of experience in the Florida transportation industry, including conducting noise studies for surface transportation projects. ESA staff have helped clients with traffic noise-related policy Our current workload is such that this project aligns perfectly with our team’s availability.The core team from our Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening Project (which just recently finished design) and Collier Boulevard Widening Project (which will finish design by early 2025) is ready to transition to this project. Page 1248 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 1 - 2 1. ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL and guidance document development, peer reviews, and development and instruction of traffic noise training courses. ESA staff has received formal training in the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA’s) Traffic Noise Model (TNM) and Highway Traffic Noise Analysis from the National Highway Institute and are FDOT-certified to perform traffic noise studies.ESA has provided Noise Studies for numerous Jacobs Collier County projects including Collier Blvd I, Collier Blvd II, Collier Blvd III, Vanderbilt Beach Road, and the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension. Archaeological and Historical Conservancy (AHC)will provide archaeological and historical services. AHC is a Florida not-for- profit corporation that has been active since 1985. They have provided pivotal leadership documenting and assessing historical, archaeological, and architectural sites throughout Southwest Florida. AHC has helped developers and property owners meet local and state historic preservation requirements and worked with the local government to develop historic preservation ordinances and County- and city- wide surveys. They have conducted surveys in Collier, Broward, Martin, Monroe, and Palm Beach counties, including over 500 assessments since 1985.Specifically, AHC has conducted archaeological assessments in Collier County since 1988. These have included private parcels, national parks, preserves, and road ROW projects, including the Immokalee Road Widening, Livingston Road Expansion, Collier Boulevard Widening and Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension. Ardaman & Associates, Inc.will provide geotechnical services. They prepared the Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report for our Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study and have direct knowledge of the Golden Gate Estates & project area. They bring extensive experience in Florida’s transportation infrastructure, including geotechnical engineering on hundreds of transportation projects ranging from full design of complex interchanges and high-level marine bridge structures to small County roadway widening projects and Project Development and Environment (PD&E) studies. Ardaman has continually provided geotechnical services in Southwest Florida since 1974. Their staff understands and is experienced implementing current FDOT and local County design standards and methodologies.Ardaman has provided geotechnical services for numerous Jacobs, Collier County, and FDOT projects—many managed by our team members—including the Collier Boulevard (CR 951) Widening, Gator Canal Bridge, Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, Alligator Alley Collier County Toll Plaza, and North Collier Boulevard from Jolley Bridge to San Marco Road Phase II projects. I.F. Rooks & Associates is a full- service geospatial firm, serving clients throughout the Southeastern United States. I.F. Rooks (IFR) provides a full suite of geospatial services including Low Altitude Photogrammetry and Aerial LiDAR. I.F. Rooks is pre-qualified by the FDOT in the 8.3 Workgroup – Photogrammetry and have completed mapping projects in every District in the State.IFR has provided Photogrammetry services for numerous Jacobs FDOT projects managed by our team members. Table 1-1:Jacobs’ history of successfully working with sub consultants on similar projects as the prime consultant. Project:Johnson Capital ESA AHC Ardaman Wilson Boulevard Widening Design YES YES YES YES YES Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension YES YES YES YES YES Collier Boulevard Widening YES YES YES YES YES Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening YES YES YES YES YES Page 1249 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 1 - 3 1. ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL The Jacobs team offers the County specialized skills and recent, relevant experience to successfully deliver all of the scope items outlined in the RPS on schedule and within budget. The key personnel committed to working on the County’s project bring a broad base of technical expertise and familiarity with Collier County. Our project management, design, permitting, and production teams are locally based, accessible, and available to meet with County staff as needed. Our team organization structure is shown in Exhibit 1-1 below. Exhibit 1-1 Team Organization Chart Page 1250 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 1 - 4 1. ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL MEET YOUR KEY STAFF The following are brief overviews of our team management and task leads and their unique qualifications to serve you on this project. Resumes for all team leaders shown on our team’s organization chart can be found in the Appendices of this submittal. Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Project Manager/Highway and Roadway/TTC Bill has more than 37 years of experience managing and coordinating a wide range of planning and engineering assignments. He routinely manages and coordinates multi-firm team efforts and provides insight into local conditions, clients, and agencies.Bill is well known to the County as a proactive manager who has been 100 percent dedicated to Collier County for more than 25 years, including serving as project manager and roadway task lead for all of our teams’ major Collier County roadway projects and 15+ General Services Contracts. Bill successfully led the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Project, Collier Blvd Widening Project(s) I, II, & III (from US-41 to Immokalee Road), Pine Ridge Road II, Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening, Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study, and is actively managing the Wilson Boulevard Widening Design Project, giving him unmatched insight into this project area Joseph Martin, PE Principal-In-Charge Joe has over 34 years of experience working as a designer as well as a contractor, which provides him a unique perspective on the design, maintainability and constructability of highway and bridge projects. His design philosophy ensures the delivery of projects that exemplify constructability, quality, and best value. Joe has supported our Naples office for more than a decade.Joe is currently assisting with three Collier County Roadway projects: Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, Collier Blvd Widening III-Phase I, and the Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening Project. In addition, Joe was the Project Manager on the State Road (Sr) 806/Atlantic Ave from W. of State Road (Sr) 7 to East of Lyons Road (See Section 3). Nick De Ciccio, PE Deputy Project Manager Nick brings 7 years of experience as a project manager, deputy project manager and transportation project engineer, delivering various major transportation and site/civil projects. Nick has worked on an array of projects including traffic, roadway, transit, facilities, pedestrian bridge relocations and bridge replacement. He has an excellent working relationship with Collier County’s growth management department, public works departments, and the Seminole Tribe of Florida, and has extensive stakeholder interaction experience.Nick was Project Engineer/ Deputy Project Manager for several Collier County projects including the Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening Design, and Collier Blvd Widening III-Phase II, giving him in-depth knowledge of this project area. Ken Wooten, PE QA/QC Roadway Ken has more than 23 years of experience designing roadways, managing multidisciplinary design projects, and conducting PD&E studies. He specializes in roadway design and planning for highway facilities, including interstate highways, interchanges, freeways, intersections, and urban and rural arterial roads. He has managed multiple roadway and intersection design projects throughout Florida, including milling and resurfacing. Ken has experience performing quality control reviews of design and concept plans and has served as a quality manager responsible for project’s overall quality control on multiple projects.Ken brings extensive design experience, served as QA/QC Manager on numerous Collier County Roadway projects and was a key team member on the County’s Oil Well Road Widening project. Page 1251 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 1 - 5 1. ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL KEY STAFF, CONT. Danh Lee, PE QA/QC – Drainage/Permitting Danh has over 21 years of experience designing transportation and drainage projects and developing plans for major and minor roadways, expressways, and interstate highways, including major multi-level interchanges. He has successfully procured numerous surface water and environmental permits for clients across Florida, including permits from St. Johns River Water Management District, the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).Danh brings in-depth knowledge of drainage needs and considerations along the project corridor, having served as Drainage QC Lead for the Pond Siting Report as part of the Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study and is familiar with the Golden Gate Estates area and permitting requirements. Velvet Bridges, PE, MSCE QA/QC – Structures Velvet has 34 years of experience in the design of concrete bridges, ship impact, structural modeling, and quality control. Her experience also includes preliminary and final design of major bridge structures in concrete, including grade separations and water crossing, post-tensioned segmental concrete, and long-span cable-stayed types.She has experience with miscellaneous structure design for projects including gravity walls, retaining walls, sign structures, and signal pole foundation design which will be applicable to this project. Brett Rakita, PE Structural Design Lead Brett has 25 years of work experience in the field of structures design with 23 years focusing on transportation structures, including performing structural analysis and design for steel and concrete bridges and buildings. He also has experience with shop drawing review, bridge inspection, and load rating for various bridge types.He has experience with miscellaneous structure design for projects including gravity walls, retaining walls, sign structures, and signal pole foundation design which will be applicable to this project. Brett has a broad experience of major design-build projects and post design services. Brett has been the structural Engineer of Record and Structural Project Engineer for numerous Collier County projects, including Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext., Wilson Blvd Roadway Widening, and Collier Blvd Widening III-Phase II. Mohamad Gebarin, PE Roadway Design Lead Mohamad is a Transportation Design Professional Engineer with 9 years of roadway design, production, and project management experience. He is experienced and detail-oriented and has extensive experience in design- build, conventional RRR, widening, intersection improvements, sidewalk / trail improvements, and complete street safety projects. He is well versed in design and production utilizing MicroStation, OpenRoads Designer and MicroStation v8i GEOPAK, and is an expert in 3D corridor modeling. Mohamad thrives in a collaborative team setting and has been successful in producing high quality deliverables for clients. He prides himself in his ability to communicate with team staff and clients. Page 1252 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 1 - 6 1. ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL KEY STAFF, CONT. Nathan Lunsford, PE Developer/Adjacent Project Coordination/Graphics/Roadway Nathan has 5 years of experience in transportation roadway, bridge design, transportation planning, developer review, site/civil projects, and project management. He has worked on an array of projects including traffic, roadway, transit, planning, bridge relocation, utility relocations, project pursuits and business development, corridor studies, and presentations. He has an excellent working relationship with Collier County’s Growth Management Department, Collier County Public Works Departments, and extensive stakeholder interaction experience.Nathan has extensive experience with the nearby and relevant Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study and Wilson Boulevard Widening design which will prove useful in this project. Darren Dyer, PE Drainage Design Lead Darren’s 16 years of experience includes drainage design, environmental permitting, and plans production for infrastructure projects in South Florida. He is experienced preparing preliminary design, final design, and post-design and brings design build experience as owner’s representative. His Florida-specific drainage and permitting experience will add tremendous value to this project. Darren was lead drainage engineer on many of Jacobs and Collier County’s largest roadway projects.Darren brings in-depth knowledge of drainage needs and considerations along the project corridor and is currently the senior drainage engineer for the nearby similar Wilson Boulevard Widening Project and provided extensive drainage design for Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension. Mike Dickey, PE Utilities Design Lead Mike has 25 years of experience on utility projects, including planning and distribution and collection systems. Mike’s experience includes working for a local utility contractor, giving him an in-depth understanding of how engineering designs are translated from paper to pipes in the ground. This experience has also honed Mike’s ability to develop designs that emphasize constructability.Mike has been the project manager and engineer of record for many water and wastewater utility projects in Southwest Florida. Rick Gorsira Permitting / Environmental Lead Rick has over 40 years of experience in ecological assessments, stormwater, surface water, groundwater, wetland delineation, sediment sampling design, and wildlife assessments. He has expertise monitoring wellfield withdrawal impacts on wetland hydrology and other water supply projects. Rick has managed numerous projects involving National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permitting and environmental compliance, and he brings extensive experience in aerial photo interpretation, hydroperiod assessments, water supply and reuse water recharge applications, and Environmental Resource Program permitting for water supply projects throughout Florida.Rick assisted with the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study, Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening Project and Collier Boulevard Widening project(s). Page 1253 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 1 - 7 1. ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL Jacobs has successfully worked with our subconsultant partners on many past Collier County Roadway Projects. The team members shown have all worked successfully together on similar projects, creating a synergy which will ensure efficient and effective project delivery. Exhibit 1-2 Team members’ roles and past Collier County Roadway Projects Experience Page 1254 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 1 - 8 1. ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL Our team members know Collier County and understand every aspect of the Everglades Boulevard Widening Design Project. The Everglades Boulevard Widening Design team must possess the right combination of technical expertise and relevant experience to seamlessly advance the design to construction. This requires a team with knowledge of the project’s technical complexities including associated drainage and permitting requirements, constructability constraints, temporary traffic control (TTC) requirements and ROW needs (roadway and ponds). Our team possesses institutional knowledge of the various project components, including existing and future traffic, urban roadway typical section requirements, bicycle and pedestrian needs, existing and future development conformance, access management criteria, environmental impacts and mitigation, utility coordination and relocations, and project stakeholder involvement. As the team who delivered the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Project, Oil Well Road Widening Segments I, II, & III, the Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road Corridor Study (all successful projects within the project area),we are confident that we have the technical expertise, local, relevant experience, and established relationships to deliver this project in a streamlined, timely, and cost-effective manner. We will capitalize on our previous design project experience to provide implementable, cost-effective solutions that protect environmentally sensitive resources and build consensus by engaging the multiple project stakeholders.The relevant experience our team has delivering the nearby Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study and actively designing the Wilson Boulevard Widening Project will allow our experienced team to immediately move into design without unexpected issues, as Everglades Boulevard Widening and Wilson Boulevard Widening are two very similar projects. Our Team will Focus on Critical Project Elements Our experience designing Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, Wilson Boulevard Widening, and conducting the Wilson Boulevard Corridor Widening Study allows us to hit the ground running on this project. We already have a deep understanding of the project’s challenges, particularly with utilities, drainage, pond site acquisition and ROW needs, giving us a head start on locking in the design footprint and expediting permitting to move this project from design to construction on time and with potential cost savings for the County. Our task leads will focus on the following “CRITICAL PATH”project components: 1.ROW needs for the widening and associated stormwater treatment facilities – Provide 12 Month Schedule for ROW acquisition (From Sketch and Description) 2.SFWMD ERP, FDEP Permit, SFWMD ROW Permit(s) – Provide 9-12 Month Schedule for Permit(s) These two Critical Path Items will require early resolution of the following design components: Roadway Typical Section –Final Refinement to Typical Section, Turn-lane requirements, access management, Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Environmental Surveys (including Wetland, T&E Species, etc.) – Surveys, Coordination and Field Reviews with Agencies Drainage Basin and Pond Location Refinement –Proximity to residential well sites, residential septic fields, and conveyance and discharge locations Access management for planned developments along Everglades Boulevard Utility easements required utility agencies (FPL, Comcast, Summit Broadband) – Our team has already completed a Sunshine One Call to identify known agency utilities in the area. Constructability, construction phasing, and TTC – Traffic requirements, adjacent residential requirements (access, safety, etc.) Roadway Design Our team members have already performed preliminary engineering analyses for the corridor and associated intersection improvements. There are several constraints and considerations along the project corridor, including the residential properties and driveways, non-residential properties, school bus accommodation, pedestrian accommodation (including children’s access to bus stops), and more. To minimize impacts as much as possible, we evaluated multiple typical section options to find the optimal typical section and roadway alignment. We are proposing the need for a 165’ ROW (32.5’ from the west and east in addition to the 100’ ROW),with the need for a 10’ shared use pathway to accommodate the SUN Trail Network, provide a pathway for children to nearest bus stop/pick-up (side streets), and tie into Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Phase II northern pathway. = Unique Understanding Page 1255 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 1 - 9 1. ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL Drainage Drainage is a major issue for this project, as flooding occurs along the roadway and adjacent properties during moderate rain events. The major flooding on the corridor’s side streets that occurs during normal rain events will need to be addressed. Our team will coordinate with County ROW department for early identification of potential pond sites (well ahead of a typical design schedule) due to the rapid development of residential homes on top of limited, viable pond sites. Our team has developed a set of procedures during the Wilson Boulevard Widening Design for early identification of potential pond sites for the County and Board of County Commissioner approval and County acquisition of the pond site. As an example of the rapid development in the area 10 parcels were all under development at the same time earlier this year, (as pictured to the right) just south of the project limits (between 10th AVE NE and 8th AVE NE). Similar to Wilson Boulevard Widening Design, rapid development along the corridor will limit pond site alternatives and require an accelerated acquisition process for pond sites. Traffic Because of our experience managing the Collier MPO 2045 and 2050 Long Range Transportation Plans, as well as traffic studies associated with the Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study, Vanderbilt Beach Road Corridor Study, and Randall Boulevard Corridor Study projects, our team is uniquely familiar with the traffic needs in the area. We will perform traffic analyses at the intersections of 18th AVE NE, Randall Boulevard, and Oil Well Road to provide the appropriate intersection configurations that meet future traffic operation demands. 18th AVE NE feeds Sabal Palm Elementary and Cypress Palm Middle School, and we will ensure the turn lanes and turning radii will accommodate the needs for the influx of school traffic and buses. Our traffic experience involves analyzing intersection control evaluation and traffic signal physical and operational requirements to optimize efficiency and safety, signal warrant and interconnection analyses, and final design plans, specifications, cost estimates, and construction contract documents. Our team has performed this type of work for cities, counties, and FDOT. Construction We have significant County experience on construction projects where we performed constructability and biddability reviews of our or other firms design plans. Our team includes licensed Florida contractors and inspectors who possess the critical local knowledge to serve the County, including construction phase and construction engineering and inspection experience on roadway, bridge, and sidewalk projects. Our team will work with the County ROW department to coordinate with homeowners to ensure their new driveway’s tie-down to their existing driveway will have a smaller slope that allows for a smoother driving experience for the homeowner and is more conducive for low-riding cars.As part of our Wilson Boulevard Widening Design, our team has identified several driveways that will require “Rights of Entry” that extend beyond the proposed ROW; this is done in coordination with the homeowner to ensure the homeowner is receiving a driveway that meets standards and maintains high stakeholder approval. Our team will implement that same design philosophy in the Everglades Boulevard Widening Design. Community/Business Coordination The surrounding land along the project corridor is primarily residential, and our experience with the public outreach will prove invaluable to gaining consensus. Based on our experience with the public feedback from the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study and Randall Boulevard Corridor Study, the major public concerns we anticipate with this project will include ROW acquisition, pedestrian and bicycle safety, lighting, access management changes, flooding, and general aesthetics. We have successfully prepared for and held more than 100 Public Meetings, HOA Meetings, One on Ones, etc. (formal and informal) and worked with numerous stakeholders on other County projects in the area, including Vanderbilt Beach Road, Wilson Boulevard, Oil Well Road, Collier Boulevard, Immokalee Road, and Randall Boulevard. Construction of Southbound Lanes will commence while traffic flows on existing roadway (Phase I), then switch over to construct the northbound lanes (Phase II). Residential Development Residential Flooding Page 1256 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 1 - 10 1. ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL Permitting and Regulatory Experience in Southwest Florida Because of our experience in Collier County and particularly the Golden Gate Estates area, we have valuable insight on latest agency concerns and processes, which allows us to streamline the application and review process and expedite wherever feasible. Potential permitting issues for this project include wetland impact mitigation, panther habitat mitigation (secondary zone impacts), gopher tortoise mitigation, floodplain compensation, and impacts to other listed species. We have successfully worked with the SFWMD, USACE, and FDEP and prepared permitting plans that meet state and federal guidelines. Based on our experience with the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (VBRX) project and Wilson Boulevard Widening project, we anticipate a Florida bonneted bat survey may/will be required as well as gopher tortoise mitigation. Our local team members have extensive experience surveying wetlands and assessing sites for gopher tortoise mitigation needs. We have successfully worked with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and FDOT reviewing the plans for meeting state and federal guidelines. Our experience in Collier County and the Golden Gate Estates area keeps us up to date on the latest agency concerns and processes, allowing us to streamline the application and review process and expedite wherever feasible. Exhibit 1-3 Permitting Experience Our team has a proven track record of successfully working with local, regional, and state permitting and regulatory agencies. Exhibit 1-3 Demonstrates our team’s experience with regulatory agencies (including those with jurisdiction in Collier County). Page 1257 of 5277 Page 1258 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 2 - 1 2. CERTIFIED MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE Jacobs is not a Certified Minority Business Enterprise (MBE). However, people are the heart of our business, and inclusion is one of our core values. We have an unparalleled focus on inclusion, and we have earned a positive reputation for assisting and protecting the interests of minority-owned businesses to promote competition and encourage free market opportunities for MBEs on our contracts both locally and globally. Along with building a team that does quality work, we involve MBE firms as team members who deliver significant and meaningful project assignments. Jacobs assigns our MBE partners work that will challenge and grow their technical capabilities and capacity. We believe that building diverse teams helps us unlock greater potential for ourselves, our clients, and our communities. Jacobs has an outstanding reputation for equal employment and workforce development. We’ve been recognized nationally with more than 30 awards for MBE/Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) contracting since 1999, including the Small Business Administration Dwight Eisenhower Award for Excellence and the Frances Perkins Vanguard Award—two of the most prestigious national awards. We’ve also received recognition throughout the state of Florida that includes exceeding our commitment to FDOT, where we have received an “A” rating for our DBE partnerships. Our industry leadership in mentoring MBE/DBE firms is something we pride ourselves on. For this project, we have teamed with Capital Consulting Solutions (CCS), a Naples-based MBE firm, to provide MOT, graphics, data collection, drone photography, and constructability review support. CCS is also a certified DBE/SBE firm. CCS is pre-qualified by FDOT in Group 3: Highway Design– Roadway, Group 6: Traffic Engineering and Operations Studies, Group 7: Traffic Operations Design, Group 10: Construction Engineering Inspection, and Group 13: Planning. Prior to founding CCS in 2017, the firm’s principal, Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP, CGC, worked for Jacobs in the firm’s Naples office. Adam worked side-by-side with Project Manager Bill Gramer and the entire Jacobs Naples-based staff on a daily basis. They collaborated with Jacobs on many projects in Collier County, including County’s general services contracts, Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening, Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, and Wilson Boulevard Widening. This established working and personal relationship will mean seamless integration of the resources of CCS and Jacobs team members. While Jacobs does not maintain minority business status, we have teamed with Capital Consulting Solutions (CCS), a Naples-based MBE firm who has worked closely with our team and Collier County for many years. Page 1259 of 5277 Page 1260 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 1 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Our proposed project team has extensive experience in Collier County as well as in the Golden Gate Estates area. In addition, we have a long, proven record of successful performance on a large number of roadway widening projects in the County (see Exhibit 3-1 and Exhibit 3-2). Many of our proposed team members delivered the relevant Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study and are currently designing Wilson Boulevard Widening, and they have provided services for or in the County on many other projects. These professionals bring their understanding of local conditions, priorities, regulations, and agencies, as well as your preferred methods of project delivery and standards for quality.Just as important, we have the technical expertise and lessons learned gained from our work on these projects, allowing us to proactively and efficiently address key challenges that affect project success. As illustrated in Exhibit 3-1, our proposed team members routinely work well together to deliver roadway improvement projects for the County. Our team’s history of working together on similar projects results in a truly integrated team with a demonstrated ability to successfully complete your project—on time and within budget. Unparalleled Knowledge of Collier County We bring an acute understanding of this project and existing conditions in the area that we’ve developed over decades of planning, studies, design, and construction management experience on County projects. In addition to delivering more than a dozen major roadway designs for Collier County, our team has completed hundreds of projects under general services contract assignments. Our task order work has consisted of transportation planning, traffic impact study reviews, developer contribution agreement reviews, roadway planning, roadway designs, complete streets, roundabouts, intersection designs, transit designs (bus shelter design, bus stop design), 100 miles of sidewalks and bike lanes, 40 miles of pathways, boardwalk designs, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) surveys for 400+ County facilities, grant writing (i.e., Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery [TIGER], Safe Routes to Schools, Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program [EECBG]), bridge designs, box culvert designs, pedestrian bridges, weir structural evaluations, 100+ miles of utility designs, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permitting, drainage design, South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) permitting, environmental surveys (i.e., threatened and endangered species, wetlands, contamination), US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) permitting, consultant peer reviews, pavement evaluations (1,000+ lane miles), site and civil plans, architectural designs, facilities designs, landfill design (i.e., master planning), construction engineering and inspection, and emergency response services. Jacobs, led by Project Manager, Bill Gramer, has partnered with Collier County over the last 25 years to plan, design, and construct 15 roadway projects within the County requiring services directly related to the Everglades Boulevard Widening Design.The experience gained over the last 25 years of successful planning and design will allow the Jacobs team to deliver this project efficiently and effectively. Exhibit 3-1:Decades of Experience Working Together Our team members have more than a decade of experience partnering on projects for the County, particularly in the Golden Gate Estates area, resulting in a truly integrated approach to the Everglades Boulevard Widening Design Project. Wilson Boulevard Widening Design (2-Lane to 4-Lane) Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (New 6-Lane/2-Lane) Vanderbilt Beach Road I (2-Lane to 6-Lane) Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening (4-Lane to 6-Lane) Oil Well Road Widening Segment I, II, and III (2-Lane to 4-Lane/6-Lane) Collier Boulevard Widening I (2-Lane to 6-Lane) Collier Boulevard Widening II (4-Lane to 6-Lane) Collier Boulevard Widening II Extension (4-Lane to 8-Lane) Collier Boulevard Widening III Phase I (4-Lane to 6-Lane) Collier Boulevard Widening III Phase II (4-Lane to 6-Lane) Pine Ridge Road II (4-Lane to 6-Lane) Immokalee Road I (2-Lane to 4-Lane Widening) Immokalee Road II (4-Lane to 6-Lane Widening) Page 1261 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 2 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Past/Current Project Experience Within Project Area Exhibit 3-2 Experience Within Project Area Page 1262 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 3 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Unique Project Understanding (South Section: Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension to 22nd AVE NE) Exhibit 3-3 Our extensive project area experience over the decades has allowed our team to begin to identify unique project challenges/opportunities in preparation for this RPS. As shown by Exhibit 3-3 and Exhibit 3-4, our team has a detailed understanding of the project and what opportunities/challenges the project brings. This will help the County and Jacobs create a comprehensive scope of work (similar to our rapid scope of work development for Wilson Boulevard Widening Design) which will assist in preventing schedule/budget over-runs. Page 1263 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 4 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Unique Project Understanding (North Section: 22nd AVE NE to Oil Well Road) Exhibit 3-4 Our extensive project area experience over the decades has allowed our team to begin to identify unique project challenges/opportunities in preparation for this RPS. As shown by Exhibit 3-3 and Exhibit 3-4, our team has a detailed understanding of the project and what opportunities/challenges the project brings. This will help the County and Jacobs create a comprehensive scope of work (similar to our rapid scope of work development for Wilson Boulevard Widening Design) which will assist in preventing schedule/budget over-runs. Page 1264 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 5 3. PAST PERFORMANCE GIS Data Collection: Everglades Boulevard Our team members’ previous experience on Collier County roadways and within the Everglades Boulevard project area, including Oil Well Road Widening Segments 1, 2, & 3, Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension and Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road Corridor Study, gives our team a unique perspective on what important issues will need to be resolved early in the design process to ensure an on-time and on-budget delivery of this Everglades Boulevard Widening project. For this proposal, our team has researched and put together the following GIS maps, which will help formulate the final scope of work and allow our team to work efficiently upon notice to proceed. Exhibit 3-5:GIS Maps Page 1265 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 6 3. PAST PERFORMANCE The Jacobs Team Experience Within and/or Near the Project Corridor Under this study and design, our team evaluated alternatives to widen Wilson Boulevard from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road (approximately 3.2 miles) from a two-lane undivided roadway to a four-lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. We evaluated alternative alignments to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. Proposed improvements also included the addition of sidewalks, a shared-use path, bike lanes for improved multimodal mobility, and bus stop enhancements. Additional project elements included changes to access at the intersections, drainage system upgrades, bridge replacement, utility relocation, and acquisition of right-of-way (ROW). This Everglades Blvd Widening project shares multiple similarities to the Wilson Blvd Widening project, including typical section, ROW needs, constructability issues, side street access, drainage needs, wetland impacts, and environmental impacts. During the design, our team has held numerous coordination meetings with developers to review site plans, access management, fair-share cost estimates, drainage assessments, and more. Additionally, we have coordinated with numerous homeowners who are constructing their house along the corridor to discuss the construction of their fence/gate. Our team has identified drainage requirements, including pond site locations, early in the process to expedite ROW acquisition due to limited available parcels along the corridor for ponds. Jacobs managed design for the extension of Vanderbilt Beach Road, a new 7-mile road from east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) to 16th Street Northeast. We led public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, maintenance of traffic (MOT), structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. The project includes relocating a 2-mile section of the Cypress Canal to the south of the roadway and three new bridges at Curry Canal, Corkscrew Canal, and Orange Tree Canal. Minor improvements to existing intersecting streets included Weber Boulevard, Danbury Boulevard, Massey Street, Douglas Street, Wilson Boulevard, 8th Street Northeast, 16th Street Northeast and a new intersection to Greyhawk Trail for the Golf Club of The Everglades. Our team provided stormwater design for 16 drainage basins, including 11 wet detention ponds and 5 dry detention ponds to treat water quality prior to discharge to the canals.The project included continuous coordination with SFWMD conceptual Environmental Resource Program and construction permits. The project also included utility relocation and wastewater, potable, and raw water main design. The project included ROW acquisition of over 300 parcels comprising of 314 acres. We conducted an environmental assessment, developing innovative approaches to wetland delineations and Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System mapping using a mobile data collection platform. The project included a listed species assessment and surveys as well as wetland and other surface water impacts. Jacobs successfully coordinated mitigation credits for the County to purchase from mitigation banks to address impacts to both wetlands and the Florida panther. An environmental resource permit was issued by SFWMD in 2021 with a single request for additional information. We coordinated with USACE and FDEP and obtained a state 404 permit. VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD EXTENSION Client: Collier County, FL Completed: 2022 (Design) Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Kevin Heldorfer, Nick De Ciccio, Nathan Lunsford, Felicia Kirby, Darren Dyer, Adam Ahmad,Rick Gorsira WILSON BOULEVARD WIDENING CORRIDOR STUDY & DESIGN Client: Collier County, FL Completed: 2022, Design Ongoing Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Nathan Lunsford, Kevin Heldorfer Nick De Ciccio, Felicia Kirby, Rick Gorsira, Sonal Dodia, Darren Dyer, Adam Ahmad, Vanessa Davis Page 1266 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 7 3. PAST PERFORMANCE We are managing the widening of 4 miles of the existing four-lane, urban divided roadway to a six-lane facility. Tasks included public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting (SFWMD, USACE, and FDEP), MOT, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. Phase I (Green to Golden Gate Boulevard) has been constructed. Phase II (Main Golden Gate Canal to Green Boulevard) is currently post 90% Design and will be completed early 2025.Our stormwater design team utilized the extra treatment and attenuation constructed as part of the Collier Boulevard Phase I Widening Project to satisfy the permitting requirements of the Collier Boulevard Phase III Widening Project. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 1 initiated a Project Development and Environment (PD&E) study to evaluate proposed improvements at the intersection of Immokalee Road (County Road 846) and Randall Boulevard in Collier County, Florida. Intersection capacity improvements are needed to accommodate the projected future traffic demand. The proposed project will improve future intersection operations and result in enhanced mobility and safety. Additionally, intersection improvements will increase regional transportation network connectivity, reduce crashes, improve operations on existing evacuation routes, and expand multi-modal access to pedestrian and bicycle traffic in the area. We prepared an initial alternatives technical memorandum to document the need for the project, developed intersection improvement alternatives, and conducted a preliminary comparative evaluation based on engineering constraints, environmental effects, and preliminary cost estimates. Proposed alternatives include at-grade alternatives and grade-separated alternatives to increase the intersection capacity. Jacobs delivered design plans for the median widening of 1.7 miles of the existing four-lane roadway to a six-lane roadway. Tasks included public involvement meetings, roadway design, drainage, permitting (SFWMD), MOT, structural design of a double barrel 9’ x 5’ box culvert to replace an existing 72” pipe, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. The design bid plans have been submitted, and construction is anticipated to start in the summer of 2025. Johnson Engineering and Capital Consulting were sub consultants on this project, providing a synergy and familiarity that will carry over to this project. Our team has also held numerous public engagement meetings with the Pelican Marsh Community, homeowners’ association boards, and Naples Christian Church to educate the stakeholders about the impacts of the widening and the box culvert installation, and how our team has implemented multiple mitigation efforts to minimize impact to their establishments. IMMOKALEE ROAD AT RANDALL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION PD&E STUDY Client: Collier County, FL Completed: 2019 Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Nick De Ciccio, Kevin Heldorfer, Felicia Kirby, Tara Jones, Adam Ahmad, Colleen Ross COLLIER BOULEVARD III DESIGN Client: Collier County, FL Completed: Ongoing (3/2025 Final) Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Nick De Ciccio, Kevin Heldorfer, Nathan Lunsford, Felicia Kirby, Darren Dyer, Adam Ahmad, Rick Gorsira VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD WIDENING (US-41 TO FONTANA DEL SOL WAY) Client: Collier County, FL Completed: 2024 Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Nick De Ciccio, Kevin Heldorfer, Nathan Lunsford, Felicia Kirby, Darren Dyer, Adam Ahmad,Brett Rakita Page 1267 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 8 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Jacobs designed the widening of 1.5 miles of State Road 806/Atlantic AVE from an existing 2-lane rural roadway to a 4-lane divided roadway with accommodations for a future 6-lane roadway (median widening). The project included 6’ sidewalks and 7’ buffered bicycle lanes on both sides of the roadway, expanding the intersection of SR 7 and SR 806 to include a third northbound and southbound through lane and a second northbound right turn lane on SR 7, expanding the intersection of Lyons Rd and SR 806 to include three eastbound and westbound lanes, dual eastbound and westbound left turn lanes, and single eastbound and westbound right turn lanes, and to relocate Lake Worth Drainage District L-34 Canal to accommodate the widening. This process also engaged the public with an in-person public involvement meeting in coordination with FDOT. Jacobs conducted a congestion analysis for future (5-year and 20-year) conditions along a 2.3-mile segment of Immokalee Road from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard, including nine intersections. Our team obtained traffic counts, evaluated surrounding land use, and projected traffic forecasts along the corridor and at the intersections for existing (2019), 2025, and 2040 conditions. Due to the severe congestion projected and limited ROW available, we performed an alternatives analysis to evaluate both conventional and innovative alternatives at each of the intersections. The corridor was modeled in SYNCHRO software by Trafficware to conduct the analysis for delay, volume to capacity ratio, and level of service for existing and future conditions under the no-build and build scenarios. Types of innovative improvements evaluated at each of the nine intersections using the FDOT’s Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE)process and evaluated intersection types included a continuous-flow intersection (CFI), jug handle, single point urban interchange (SPUI), restricted crossing U-turn (R-CUT), diverging diamond interchange (DDI), median U-turn (MUT), and Continuous Green-T, as applicable. We prepared concepts for the recommended improvements at each intersection and along the corridor. Concepts with innovative solutions included: SPUI at Livingston Road A CFI at Strand Boulevard and Juliet Boulevard A DDI at the I-75 interchange A CFI and SPUI at Logan Boulevard We prepared a video presentation, including animation for a CFI and DDI, and used it for public involvement activities. We also conducted a public meeting (virtual due to COVID-19 restrictions), and coordinated meetings with stakeholders such as homeowners associations (HOAs), business owners, Fire District, FDOT, Collier County Sheriff’s Department, and social media. IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY Client: Collier County, FL Completed: 2021 Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Nick De Ciccio, Robert Grubel, Tom Ross, Felicia Kirby, Nathan Lunsford, Kevin Heldorfer, Vanessa Davis STATE ROAD (SR) 806/ATLANTIC AVE FROM W. OF STATE ROAD (SR) 7 TO EAST OF LYONS ROAD Client: FDOT District 4 Completed: Ongoing (Construction) Key Team Members: Joseph Martin, Tara Jones, Colleen Ross OIL WELL ROAD WIDENING SEGMENTS 1, 2, 3 (Immokalee Rd to Everglades Blvd N, Oil Well Grade Rd to Camp Keais Rd) Client: Collier County, FL Completed: 2017 Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Tom Ross, DeeAngela Tjikueni, Kevin Heldorfer, Ken Wooten Page 1268 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 9 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Jacobs led design and permitting for the widening and reconstruction of 11.1 miles of Oil Well Road. The project involved widening a two-lane rural section to a four-lane and six-lane urban section. We led extensive public involvement due to impacts to environmentally sensitive areas as well as heavily developed sections of the corridor. Coordination with Collier County Public Schools was required due to the 3 schools on Oil Well Rd. The permitting effort included drainage and environmental impacts as well as wildlife crossings for endangered species such as the Florida Panther. Our team prepared a bridge design report and design and plans for three bridge replacements, two box culvert extensions, and miscellaneous structures. All three bridge replacements involved three-span American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Type II beam superstructures on conventional pile bents. The bridge lengths are 132 feet, 135 feet, and 150 feet, respectively. Jacobs performed this environmental and engineering study to evaluate potential roadway network improvements near Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road in Collier County. The improvements included development of an east-west corridor to reduce congestion, improve traffic flow, and accommodate future travel demand through 2045. We evaluated potential improvements to Randall Boulevard, Oil Well Road, Desoto Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard and potential corridors on a new alignment. We developed alternatives and comparatively evaluated the social and environmental effects and overall cost of each option. Proposed alternatives included 4 and 6 lane designs for Everglades Blvd and Desoto Blvd. The study considered traffic operation improvements such as roundabouts, grade separated overpasses, frontage roadways, access management, and new traffic signal locations for the recommended alternative. The study process blended preliminary engineering, environmental impact assessments, public outreach, and agency coordination. Our team led public involvement, data collection and projections, corridor alternatives development, evaluation methodology and criteria development, corridor alternatives analysis and ranking, and selection of a preferred corridor alternative. The project consisted of improvements to the Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard intersection to provide additional capacity (triple-lefts) and extend Collier Boulevard north by about a half-mile. Our team provided roadway alternatives analysis, roadway design, drainage design, sidewalks, bike lanes, pathways, Cocohatchee Canal Relocation (USACE NW permitting), prefabricated bridge crossing of Cocohatchee Canal, CR 951 box culvert extension, signalization, lighting, utility design (36-inch water main, 30-inch water main (42-inch by 540-linear-foot directional drill), 16-inch force main, and 24-inch reclaimed water main), and coordinating transmission and distribution line relocation with Florida Power & Light (FPL). We led permitting with SFWMD, USACE, and FDEP; designed a boat ramp; and coordinated with adjacent developments such as NCH Hospital and CVS. The SFWMD permit included onsite treatment and attenuation and compensatory storage within the adjacent development to minimize costs and maximize treatment. Jacobs’ Immokalee Road-Collier Boulevard Intersection design has been constructed in pieces to accommodate traffic needs and construction budgets. However, we designed the intersection to eventually accommodate a single point urban interchange (SPUI) at this location. RANDALL BOULEVARD AND OIL WELL ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY Client: Collier County, FL Completed: 2019 Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Tom Ross, Nick De Ciccio, Tara Jones, Kevin Heldorfer, Adam Ahmad, Colleen Ross IMMOKALEE ROAD-COLLIER BOULEVARD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS - FUTURE SPUI Client: Collier County, FL Completed: 2017 Key Team Members: Bill Gramer, Tom Ross, DeeAngela Tjikueni, Kevin Heldorfer, Adam Ahmad, Rick Gorsira Page 1269 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 10 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Jacobs’ Collier County Roadway Design and Planning Experience Includes: We managed the design to widen Pine Ridge Road from four to six lanes, converting the existing rural section to an urban section. The 3.3-mile project included widening Pine Ridge Road through the I-75 interchange. A unique aspect of the project was redesigning northbound on and off-ramps to accommodate dual left turn lanes. We provided complete roadway design and permitting services, signal design, roadway lighting, landscaping, traffic studies, and services during construction. Our team conducted a bridge location study to evaluate four potential bridge locations to replace the existing bridge at 25th Avenue Southwest, which will be removed to accommodate the Collier Boulevard Roadway Widening Project. We developed alternatives; evaluated existing and future traffic demand, traffic operational needs, access management requirements, multimodal needs, and physical and environmental constraints; and led a public involvement meeting. We managed the widening of 4 miles of the existing four-lane, urban divided roadway. Tasks included public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting (SFWMD, USACE, and FDEP), MOT, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. Phase I (Green to Golden Gate Boulevard) has been constructed. Phase II (Main Golden Gate Canal to Green Boulevard) is currently under design. We managed development of design plans and specifications for widening the existing four-lane roadway to a six-lane facility, including four major intersections, as part of a roadway capacity improvements project for a 7-mile segment. We coordinated SFWMD, USACE and FDEP permits. Our team managed the widening design of existing two-lane roadway to a six-lane, urban divided roadway along a 3-mile corridor. This project required extensive attention to public concerns regarding local access, circulation, traffic demands, impacts to businesses and residential areas, and aesthetics. We led public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting (SFWMD, USACE, and FDEP), MOT, structural, environmental impacts, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. Jacobs led design for the half-mile segment of Tree Farm Road. This two-lane roadway section links four roadways with a new roundabout. The new two-lane roadway includes sidewalks, pathways, bike lanes, and a new roundabout. The project included water main and force main design and permitting. Our design used three adjacent development ponds for stormwater treatment and attenuation. We prepared design plans in MicroStation, conducted public involvement meetings, prepared permitting packages (SFWMD, USACE, and FDEP), and performed field calculations. Collier Boulevard II Design (US 41 to Davis Boulevard) Pine Ridge Road Design (Airport Road to Logan Boulevard) Collier Boulevard I Design (Golden Gate Blvd to Immokalee Rd) Collier Boulevard Bridge Location Study Tree Farm Road Phase II Design (Davila Street to Woodcrest Drive) Collier Boulevard III (Main GG Canal to Golden Gate Boulevard) Page 1270 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 11 3. PAST PERFORMANCE We managed the design of an 8.1-mile widening from two to four lanes (in a 6-lane footprint) and designed the ultimate 6-lane facility converting the existing rural section to an urban section. Our team provided complete roadway design, utility design, permitting (SFWMD, USACE), and drainage design. Our team managed the design to replace the existing 4-span precast slab Palm River Bridge, constructed in 1960 over the Palm River Canal, and reconstruct roadway approaches to accommodate the new structure while improving safety and adopting current FDOT standards. The roadway design enhanced the safety at the intersections by improving the existing signing and pavement markings. The bridge development report investigated a 3-span (21.5 feet-27.5 feet- 21.5 feet) precast Florida Slab Beam structure as well as a cast-in-place flat slab structure on conventional pile bents. Deterioration of existing timber piling was a major factor in the decision to replace the existing structure, so our team implemented a detour option instead of cutting the existing bridge and phased construction to eliminate potential risks and expedite work. Vibration and settlement monitoring was a key consideration due to proximity of residences. The recommended structure used a cast-in-place superstructure upon careful constructability review with potential contractors, given the moderate span lengths and relatively short bridge length. The bridge typical section carries 11-foot traffic lane, 5.5-foot shoulders and raised 6.5-foot sidewalks on both sides. We implemented ADA requirements in the design. We conducted a comprehensive analysis to determine the type, design, and location of proposed future improvements to Collier Boulevard from U.S. 41 to Immokalee Road, a distance of approximately 15 miles. As part of the study, we developed and analyzed various typical sections and roadway geometry and evaluated drainage and utility adjustment requirements, site constraints, preliminary environmental, and right-of-way requirements for a six-lane urban divided section with bike lanes, sidewalks, and stormwater management facilities. The Collier MPO selected Jacobs to prepare their 2045 LRTP. The purpose of the plan update was to advance a 20-year planning horizon and to adopt a Cost Feasible Plan (CFP) that encourages and promotes a safe and efficient, multi-modal transportation system that addresses the future year transportation demands. The LRTP includes roadways, public transportation (transit), freight, bicycle and pedestrian and multi- use trail facilities. The results of the LRTP process are to serve the overall mobility needs of the area while also being cost effective and consistent with national, state, and local goals and objectives. The 2045 LRTP addresses national Performance Measures and state adopted (FDOT) Performance Targets. The 2045 LRTP also addresses the effects of Climate Change and Autonomous Connected Electric Vehicle Shared Mobility. Immokalee Road Design I/II (Collier Boulevard to 45th AVE NE) Palm River Bridge Replacement Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Collier Boulevard Alignment Study Page 1271 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 1 3. PAST PERFORMANCE References Client reference forms for projects similar in nature to the scope of the Everglades Blvd. Widening project can be found on the following pages. Ref #Project Name Client Score 1 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Collier County 100 2 Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Design (Collier Boulevard to 16th Street NE)Collier County 99 3 Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening (US 41 to Fontana Del Sol Way)Collier County 99 4 State Road (Sr) 806/Atlantic Ave from W. Of State Road (Sr) 7 to East of Lyons Road FDOT District 4 97 Page 1272 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 12 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Reference Form #1: Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Client:Collier County Our Role: Prime Size: 3.2 Miles Key Personnel: Bill Gramer, Nathan Lunsford, Felicia Kirby, Nick De Ciccio, Kevin Heldorfer, Rick Gorsira, Sonal Dodia, Darren Dyer, Vanessa Davis Relevance 2-lane rural to 4-lane urban roadway widening Significant ROW requirements Stormwater analysis/design Project site and design constraints Stakeholder involvement Utility impacts analysis and coordination Project Description and Services Provided On this study, our team evaluated alternatives to widen Wilson Boulevard from a 2-lane undivided roadway to a 4- lane divided roadway with curb and gutter from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road (approximately 3.2 miles). The study involved evaluating alternative alignments to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. Proposed improvements also included adding sidewalks, a shared-use path, and bike lanes for improved multimodal mobility and bus stop enhancements. Additional project elements included changes to access at the intersections, drainage system upgrades, replacement of the existing bridge, utility relocation, and right-of-way acquisition. As the prime consultant, our team provided access management analysis, alternatives analysis, preliminary bridge type selection report, drainage and pond siting analysis, utility analysis, environmental analysis, right-of-way analysis, a public involvement meeting, and cost estimates. Jacobs’ experience conducting the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study and subsequent Wilson Boulevard Widening design gives us unique insight into the Everglades Boulevard widening design., due to their similar nature. Key subconsultants and delivery partners Johnson Engineering – Survey Ardaman & Associates, Inc. – Geotechnical ACH – Archeological Survey Page 1273 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 13 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Intersection of Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Bill Gramer with Collier County staff during the Tamiami Wellfield Wilson Boulevard Widening Impact Study field meeting. Proper well house driveway access along Wilson Boulevard for utility and maintenance vehicles will be incorporated into design Feedback from public meeting participants: Thank you for your help and continued help with being proactive in these growth demand problems! I strongly believe this department(s) [is] the most productive and best results producing department in all of Collier County areas of responsibilities.” Very informative meeting; hoping to be kept in the loop as the project develops.” Project manager Bill Gramer interfacing with members of the community at the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public meeting Members of the community interacting with renderings at the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study public meeting ““ Page 1274 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 14 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Reference Form #2: Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Client:Collier County Our Role: Prime Size: 7 miles of roadway and 314 acres Key Personnel: Bill Gramer, Kevin Heldorfer, Nick De Ciccio, Felicia Kirby, Nathan Lunsford Rick Gorsira, Sonal Dodia, Darren Dyer, Adam Ahmad, Vanessa Davis Relevance New 6-lane and 2-lane roadway facilities with a shared-use pathway In-depth knowledge of the Golden Gate Estates area conditions, including hydrology and permitting with FDEP/ACOE and SFWMD on environmental, wetland mitigation, Extensive public involvement/stakeholder engagement Experience working with the County for ROW acquisition and the settlement process Familiarity with Golden Gate Estates area residents’ concerns developed over numerous public involvement meetings across multiple years Utility impacts analysis and coordination Project Description and Services Provided The Vanderbilt Beach Road (VBR) Extension project involves widening and designing a new 7-mile road from east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) to 16th Street Northeast. Our team led public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, traffic maintenance, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical access management, and utility services. The project involves relocating a 2-mile section of the Cypress Canal to a location south of the roadway and included three new bridges at Curry Canal, Corkscrew Canal, and Orange Tree Canal. Our design includes minor improvements to existing intersecting streets at Weber Boulevard, Danbury Boulevard, Massey Street, Douglas Street, Wilson Boulevard, 8th Street Northeast, and 16th Street Northeast and a new intersection to Greyhawk Trail for the Golf Club of The Everglades. We provided stormwater management at 16 drainage basins, including 11 wet detention ponds and 5 dry detention ponds to treat water quality prior to discharge to Page 1275 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 15 3. PAST PERFORMANCE the canals. We coordinated regularly with SFWMD on the conceptual ERP permit and construction permit. We also provided utility relocation and design for wastewater, potable, and raw water mains. The project included ROW acquisition with over 276 parcels across 314 acres. Jacobs prepared an environmental assessment, developed innovative approaches to wetland delineations, and performed FLUCCS mapping using a mobile data collection platform. We prepared a listed species assessment, conducted surveys, and assessed wetland and other surface water impacts. We coordinated mitigation credits for the County to help them purchase from mitigation banks from impacts to both wetlands and the Florida panther. An environmental resource permit was issued by SFWMD in 2021 with a single request for additional information (RAI). We coordinated with USACOE and FDEP and obtained a state 404 permit. Key subconsultants and delivery partners Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. Capital Consulting Solutions Johnson Engineering, Inc. RWA Engineering Page 1276 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 16 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Reference Form #3: Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening Client:Collier County Our Role: Prime Size: 1.7 Miles Key Personnel: Bill Gramer, Nick De Ciccio, Nathan Lunsford, Felicia Kirby, Kevin Heldorfer, Sonal Dodia, Darren Dyer, Adam Ahmad, Vanessa Davis Relevance Roadway widening Maintaining the flow of traffic during construction Permitting (SFWMD) Utility coordination/design Extensive stakeholder coordination Project Description and Services Provided Jacobs managed the widening of 1.7 miles of the existing four-lane roadway to a 6-lane facility (Median Widening). Tasks included public involvement meetings, roadway design, drainage, permitting (SFWMD), MOT, structural design of a double barrel 9’ x 5’ box culvert to replace an existing 72” pipe, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. The design bid plans have been submitted, and constructed is anticipated to start in the summer of 2025. Johnson Engineering and Capital Consulting are our sub consultants on this project, providing a synergy and familiarity that will carry over to this project. Key subconsultants and delivery partners Johnson Engineering – SUE, Utility Design Capital Consulting – Signing and Pavement Marking, MOT Page 1277 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 17 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Our team held a public involvement meeting informing the public of the roadway widening improvements and impacts during construction. Our team prepared 3D renders illustrating the temporary traffic control plans for the installation of the double barrel 9’ x 5’ box culvert. Our team has also held numerous public engagement meetings with the Pelican Marsh Community, homeowners’ association boards, and Naples Christian Church to educate the stakeholders about the impacts of the widening and the box culvert installation, and how our team has implemented multiple mitigation efforts to minimize impact to their establishments. Our team performed multiple field reviews with County staff to review project elements/issues and develop solutions. Page 1278 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 18 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Reference Form #4: FDOT Client:FDOT District 4 Our Role: Prime Size: 1.5 Miles Key Personnel: Joseph Martin, Colleen Ross, Tara Jones Relevance 2-lane to 4-lane widening Maintaining the flow of traffic during construction Utility coordination/design Extensive stakeholder coordination Project Description and Services Provided Jacobs designed the widening of 1.5 miles of State Road 806/Atlantic AVE from an existing 2-lane rural roadway to a 4-lane divided roadway with accommodations for a future 6-lane roadway (median widening). The project included 6’ sidewalks and 7’ buffered bicycle lanes on both sides of the roadway, expanding the intersection of SR 7 and SR 806 to include a third northbound and southbound through lane and a second northbound right turn lane on SR 7, expanding the intersection of Lyons Rd and SR 806 to include three eastbound and westbound lanes, dual eastbound and westbound left turn lanes, and single eastbound and westbound right turn lanes, and to relocate Lake Worth Drainage District L-34 Canal to accommodate the widening. This process also engaged the public with an in-person public involvement meeting in coordination with FDOT. Page 1279 of 5277 Page 1280 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 4 - 1 4. PROJECT APPROACH, WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET REQUIREMENTS Project Approach Our technical approach is based on a comprehensive understanding of required roadway design elements, bicycle, and pedestrian needs, Collier County Public School (CCPS) infrastructure and needs, existing and proposed site conditions, proposed development, access management, constructability issues, utility relocations, drainage requirements, and “Critical Path” schedule items, as defined in Section 1. The following sections further describe the design elements of our project approach and key considerations. Roadway Design The existing Everglades Boulevard N runs within a 100-foot ROW easement. To satisfy the project’s purpose and need and design criteria, Jacobs identified the need for a 165 feet ROW (easement) with closed drainage system (ponds). Because of the multiple constraints along the corridor, including the proximity of residential structures to the roadway, our approach recommends ROW/easement from both sides of the road (32.5 feet to the west and 32.5 feet to the east). The proposed “Urban” typical section will require a “saw-tooth” profile (0.30% +/-). To accommodate cross slope and the base clearance requirements between the roadway base layer and seasonal high-water table, and to facilitate stormwater hydraulics, the vertical profile will change significantly (increasing approximately 2.0 to 3.0 feet - varies). The vertical alignment will be optimized to provide smooth transitions to cross streets. Relocating to proposed right turn locations will improve safety and operations. Each side street will have an open median allowing for left turns out of the side street (similar to the Wilson Boulevard Widening project). An aspect of this RPS we feel is necessary to discuss with the County is the lack of a pathway/sidewalk on the eastern side of Everglades Blvd. The CCPS buses stop at every side street, meaning any child wishing to board the bus that lives on the eastern side of Everglades Blvd will have to walk up to 700’ in unpaved, uneven terrain to the nearest bus pick-up area/home. Additionally, the SUN Trail Network currently identifies the eastern side of Everglades Blvd N as the north-south connector from Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension to Oil Well Road and is partially funded for pre-construction (FDOT FPID 455291- 1-22-01). Therefore, we have shown a 10’ multi-use asphalt pathway along the eastern side in our typical section, anticipating its need. Additionally, this pathway will connect to the future VBRX Phase II northern pathway. We will update the typical with further guidance from the County, as needed, and reduce our anticipated ROW needs. Currently, children utilize street sign poles to secure their bikes while at school. Additionally, the children have no safe resting area to await their school bus in the morning. Therefore, we propose school bus pads with bike racks and a bench at each side street to provide the children a safe area to await their school bus and safely secure their bicycles. We will coordinate with CCPS. Everglades Blvd N will be raised several feet to accommodate the urban typical section. As a result, residential driveways will need to be reconstructed.The minimum slope standards allowed by FDOT are in many cases too drastic for comfort. We will design smoother transitions to accommodate homeowners, which requires coordination with the County and homeowner to tie- down the driveway beyond the proposed ROW.Jacobs team has designed 500+ driveways throughout Collier County in our extensive roadway design experience and is currently designing smooth-transition driveways for the Wilson Blvd Widening project. Our team understands the complexities and needs of the project, and we are ready to serve you. Our team has worked on nearly every major roadway in the County over the past two decades, including numerous projects within the area and will use the knowledge gained by that history to successfully deliver this project. Temporary Traffic Control Development of Temporary Traffic Control (TTC) plans must incorporate regional and local traffic needs to safely direct traffic through the work zone. TTC will consider transitions at the major intersections including Oil Well Road, Randall Boulevard, 18th AVE NE, and Vanderbilt Beach Road (if constructed), signage, signalization, etc. A key consideration for this project’s TTC is the significant change in the roadway’s new vertical profile. Phased construction will be required. Phase 1 will keep the existing Everglades Boulevard travel lanes open to traffic while the two new lanes are = Unique Understanding Tie-Down Steep Slope Similar to Wilson Widening, constructability will dictate the alignment of the widening project. Access management and drainage needs will be considered. must meet OSHA slope standards. Page 1281 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 4 - 2 4. PROJECT APPROACH, WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET REQUIREMENTS constructed to the west. The vertical change between the existing travel lanes and the newly constructed lanes will be too steep for drivers to cross. Therefore, the intersections/cross streets will remain open with proper sloping, for drivers to access safely through the construction zone to their driveways. Phase 2 shifts traffic to the two new travel lanes while the existing travel lanes are reconstructed. Again, cross streets/intersections will be opened to access safely through the construction zone to their driveways. The unimpeded, safe movement of emergency vehicles and school bus traffic will be a special concern. We will coordinate directly with the Collier County Public Schools Board on the need/feasibility for expanding their existing bus structure system. Currently, there are no Collier Area Transit (CAT) routes located on the corridor. Some night-time operations may be necessary to minimize traffic impacts and enable the contractor to complete the work as quickly as possible. The use of black base may be recommended in some areas to reduce construction time. Drainage Because of the length of the project, flat topography, conveyance feasibility limitations, and hydraulic gradient concerns, dividing onsite basins into multiple segments that drain to multiple stormwater ponds along the project is required. ponds are anticipated for the corridor. Our team has already explored innovative stormwater treatment strategies including combining wet and dry detention ponds to meet SFWMD water quantity and water quality criteria including dry pre-treatment and nutrient removal requirements for North Golden Gate Sub-Basin (WBID 3278S) which is impaired for dissolved oxygen, with total nitrogen as the causative pollutant. Ponds must be located a minimum of 75 Feet from residential drinking Well (SFWMD Criteria).It is imperative that the Final Pond siting effort begin at NTP, as it is the most critical path for this project. Keeping in mind that permitting the stormwater ponds and associated impacts could take close to a year, pond siting must be completed early in the project to meet your 24-month design schedule. Additionally, ROW acquisition of the pond site parcels could also take up to a year after Sketch and Descriptions are prepared.Note: our proposed schedule reflects this critical path. Our team will coordinate with County ROW department for early identification of potential pond sites (well ahead of a typical design schedule) due to the rapid development of residential homes on top of limited, viable pond sites. Our team has developed a set of procedures during the Wilson Boulevard Widening Design for early identification of potential pond sites for the County and Board of County Commissioner approval and County acquisition of the pond site. Runoff from Everglades Boulevard would drain to a closed storm sewer system along curb and gutter to convey to the proposed pond sites for water quality treatment and water quantity attenuation. The two surface waters are Main Golden Gate Canal (west) and Faka Union Canal (east) both of which are anticipated to have minimal impacts to the surface water system. The canals run parallel to Everglades Blvd N at the ends of the side streets and are where the treated and attenuated stormwater will outfall. The existing roadway ditches will be relocated to the edges of the typical section to maintain existing offsite drainage patterns. The ditches will also maintain the hydraulic connections to the existing side street ditches. Based on our field reviews, the existing side street ditches are not properly conveying water to the canal systems, and some of the side streets lack conveyance at the outfalls due to years of sediment build up and are often overly vegetated. Several side street ditches will be improved due to the piped canal outfalls from pond sites, though the remaining side street ditches may require improvements as well. The project is anticipated to impact 50+ acres of 100-year floodplain, where no net encroachment is required. While the roadway improvements will reduce floodplain storage, our preliminary analysis demonstrates that the stormwater ponds and roadside swales will provide enough storage compensation to satisfy SFWMD requirements. Drainage is a major issue for this project, as flooding occurs along the roadway and adjacent properties during heavy rain events.We anticipate 4 to 5 drainage basins resulting in 4 to 5 pond sites for this roadway widening project (see Exhibit 3-3 and Exhibit 3-4). We understand the existing drainage conditions along the corridor and propose an accelerated drainage design schedule. We are experienced in all aspects of drainage design required for Everglades Boulevard, as we are currently ahead of a typical schedule for drainage design with Wilson Boulevard Widening due to the urgency needed to acquire parcels for drainage ponds. We have planned and designed closed and open drainage systems on more than 100 miles of roadways for Collier County, including over 30 pond systems. Floodplain Map Overly vegetated canal outfall Residential Flooding Page 1282 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 4 - 3 4. PROJECT APPROACH, WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET REQUIREMENTS Surveying and Right-of-Way Surveying and ROW mapping are also critical path elements for this project. Sketch and Descriptions, survey of the corridor, and pond site parcels are needed to inform the ROW acquisition process.ROW acquisition, which can take up to a year to complete, cannot begin until pond sites are selected, and the Sketch and Descriptions are complete.We understand the critical paths of this project and will begin working with Robert Bosch/ROW Department early in the project to coordinate pond sites and survey results. This early coordination will allow us to complete the design in 24 months. Utilities During our initial assessment of the corridor, Jacobs identified nine (9) Utility Agency Owners (UAOs) within the study area in our Sunshine One Call ticket. Major utilities include overhead electric (FP&L), Collier County Traffic Operations, and a gas line (TECO). The TECO gas line is our most significant impact and will require relocation to the edge of the new ROW on the western side, under or immediately adjacent to the new swale to avoid conflicts with pond outfall piping. The FP&L overhead electric will need to be relocated to the proposed eastern ROW line. Jacobs will coordinate with FP&L to relocate distribution poles along the corridor. Johnson Engineering will perform subsurface utility exploration to better identify utility locations. Physical utility locates (pot-holing) will be done immediately in critical areas to ensure proper location identification. Advance utility notification letters will be sent to the utility companies immediately upon NTP. Through early identification and resolution of potential conflicts, we will be able to reduce impacts to the design schedule. Upon NTP, letters will be distributed to local utilities informing them of the project. Once prepared, 30% plans will be sent to the utility companies, so they can confirm the location of their utilities, modify locations shown on the plans, and provide desired locations for relocations and future planned utilities. A utility meeting will be held shortly thereafter to discuss potential conflicts and give UAOs sufficient time to begin planning their redesigns (if necessary). Utility meetings will be held again after 60% submittal and utility work schedules will be requested prior to finalizing bid plans. ROW Acquisition Our preliminary analyses included an evaluation of ROW requirements.For Everglades Boulevard a minimum of 199 parcels will be impacted, not including pond sites or potential side street impacts. In addition, Temporary Construction Easements and Temporary Driveway Restoration Easements will also be required for the majority of these parcels with residential or commercial access for driveway connections. We understand the ROW acquisition needs and additional easements required for the roadway expansion and stormwater pond sites. Our experience assisting the County through the ROW acquisition and the settlement process is unmatched. Our recent project experience with the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension project included ROW acquisition, full property takes, and easement acquisition for 320+ parcels, and our ongoing Wilson Boulevard Widening Project includes ROW acquisition, full property takes, and easement acquisition for 300+ parcels. We also provided expert witness services and helped the County navigate legal challenges from property owners. Jacobs will capitalize on this experience while managing ROW and easement needs during the design to reduce potential legal challenges. Residential Development The Everglades Boulevard area is experiencing rapid growth and development, with numerous new homes being constructed each year. Our team brings a unique understanding of the challenges and opportunities associated with such projects, drawing from our extensive experience with the nearby Wilson Boulevard Widening project. One key insight we have gained is the importance of proactive coordination with new homeowners regarding the placement of gates and fences. During the Wilson Boulevard project, we encountered numerous instances where homeowners were concerned about the future impact of roadway widening on their properties. To address these concerns, our team took the initiative to engage with homeowners early in the process. We provided detailed guidance on how and where to position their gates and fences to align with the ultimate roadway design. This proactive approach not only alleviated homeowner concerns but also minimized the need for costly and disruptive relocations in the future. By applying this experience to the Everglades Boulevard project, we will ensure that new homeowners are well-informed and prepared for the upcoming changes. Our team will continue to work closely with the community, offering personalized consultations and clear illustrations to help homeowners make informed decisions about their property boundaries. This collaborative effort will foster a smoother transition and enhance community satisfaction with the project. Commercial Development The Everglades Boulevard area is not only seeing a surge in residential development but also significant commercial growth. Many developers have expressed interest in rezoning parcels, constructing gas stations, commercial building centers, and even building cellular towers. This commercial expansion is vital for supporting the growing community and enhancing local amenities. Our team’s experience with the nearby Wilson Boulevard Widening project has equipped us with the skills and insights necessary to effectively manage these commercial development challenges. Throughout the Wilson project, we successfully coordinated with several key developers, including Tractor Supply Co., St. John Paul II Sunshine One Call Ticket Page 1283 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 4 - 4 4. PROJECT APPROACH, WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET REQUIREMENTS Parish, Florida Power & Light (FPL), and Comcast. This coordination was crucial in ensuring that the roadway project progresses smoothly while accommodating the needs and timelines of these commercial entities. One of the critical aspects of our approach is proactive communication and collaboration with developers. By engaging with them early in the planning stages, we were able to address potential conflicts and align their development plans with the roadway project. This included detailed discussions on site access, utility relocations, and construction schedules to minimize disruptions and ensure a seamless integration of commercial developments with the widened roadway. For the Everglades Boulevard project, we will leverage this proven approach to facilitate successful commercial development. Our team will continue to work closely with developers, providing clear guidance and support to help them navigate the complexities of building alongside a major infrastructure project. This includes coordinating with local authorities on rezoning requests, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements, and addressing any concerns related to the construction of new facilities such as gas stations and cellular towers. In summary, our extensive experience in coordinating with commercial developers during the Wilson Boulevard Widening project uniquely positions us to manage the commercial development aspects of the Everglades Boulevard Widening project. We are committed to fostering a collaborative environment that supports the growth of local businesses while delivering a high-quality infrastructure project that benefits the entire community. Signing and Pavement Marking/Signals Signing and pavement markings and signal plans will be designed to comply with the requirements established in the latest FDOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards and the FHWA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The principle of positive vehicular guidance and consistency of sign messages will be followed when performing the signing and pavement marking design. Roadside signs will conform to Elder User Guidelines. In addition, signal interconnect will coordinate all signals within the corridor, and signal adjustments will be made to VBRX intersection (if constructed). Safety & Crash Data In preparation for this RPS, Jacobs obtained the crash data along the corridor to help identify problematic areas which need to be addressed during design. Environmental Impacts Wetland impacts and threatened and endangered (T&E) species impacts are anticipated. Because this is already a developed corridor, the majority of wetland impacts are primarily associated with the pond sites needed. Jacobs will perform field reviews to determine which undeveloped parcels have substantial wetlands to inform preliminary pond siting decisions. Therefore, we can anticipate UMAM scoring of impacted parcels to efficiently estimate mitigation costs. No surface water impacts (minimal and temporary) are anticipated. Review of T&E species and habitat within the project area and particularly the pond sites, indicates the following have a high potential of occurrence: Florida panther, Florida bonneted bat, wood stork, big cypress fox squirrel, and ghost orchid. A Florida Bonneted Bat Acoustic/Roost Survey as well as a Gopher Tortoise Survey will likely be required by USFWS at pond sites with potential roosting habitat. As soon as pond sites are determined, Jacobs will coordinate with the agencies to expedite any requirements. Coordination This project must be well-coordinated from the start. Coordination of the design effort with County staff, SFWMD, FDEP, utilities, residential properties, FDOT (SUN Trail Network), CCPS and commercial businesses is essential for a successful project. Effective project coordination is the key to avoiding delays and completing the project on schedule. Our public involvement program will begin at project kick-off, by creating our mailing lists, County website, and setting up early coordination meetings with key stakeholders. Our outreach will also include coordinating the public meetings when design plans are 30% and 60% complete. By establishing lines of communication, updating project information regularly on the County website, and maintaining an open dialogue, our team will promote public understanding and acceptance of the project, allowing it to move forward on schedule. Project Schedule Bill Gramer, PE, AICP, Project Manager and Deputy Project Manager Nick De Ciccio PE, will schedule and coordinate project activities. Changes will inevitably occur during the course of a project that could affect the schedule. When this happens, Bill will work with the County’s project manager to manage the change, with the least impact on project schedule and budget. Exhibit 4-3 identifies target milestones and critical path items for this project. Schedule monitoring will consist of bi-weekly reviews of the schedule with specific focus on Critical Path elements. A working schedule will be maintained that documents performance to date vs. target and predicts future events. Florida Panther Map CCPS coordination will be required Everglades/Randall Crash Data Page 1284 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 4 - 5 4. PROJECT APPROACH, WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET REQUIREMENTS Good schedule control means expediting completion of the project.We will conduct monthly team meetings to discuss key project milestones or any arising challenges with County staff. We will meet with each subconsultant bi-weekly to review the as-planned schedule and for a “look-ahead” review to ensure that we stay on schedule. Our teams’ extensive experience and understanding of the project’s needs and potential challenges will facilitate a project delivered on budget and, potentially, quicker than 24 months. Ability to Meet Schedule and Budget Requirements A comprehensive approach is essential to meet the budget and schedule requirements for your contract. Commitment to providing the right personnel is just the first step. Active project management is crucial, involving detailed planning to ensure realistic budgets and schedules are set and adhered to. This operational discipline is a cornerstone of Jacobs' strategy to deliver successful projects. Collaborating with the County from project start offers several key benefits: Clear Project Scope:Early collaboration ensures that all parties have a shared understanding of the project’s goals, requirements, and limitations. This helps prevent misunderstandings and scope issues as design progresses. Baseline Schedule:Establishing a baseline schedule with critical milestones helps keep the project on track. Stakeholder Alignment: Engaging with the stakeholders early on ensures that their ideas and needs are documented, addressed and are aligned with project goals. This can facilitate approvals and reduce potential delays. Risk Management:Identifying potential risks and challenges early allows for proactive mitigation strategies, reducing the likelihood of issues arising during later stages of the project. Resource Optimization: Early collaboration helps in identifying the necessary resources and expertise required, ensuring that the right people are involved from the start. This will result in a cost-effective project delivery. Bi-weekly or monthly team meetings with internal team members to address project tasks, budgets, deliverables and schedule requirements. Monthly progress meetings with County staff to discuss project progression and discuss project elements. OUR COMMITMENT TO COLLIER COUNTY OUR DELIVERABLES PROJECT START-UP AND EXECUTION PLAN Upon notice-to-proceed, we will work with the County to develop a plan that lays out the protocols and standards that will mitigate risk, identify opportunities, and guide the successful and efficient execution of this project. Conduct kick-off meeting and submit meeting minutes Prepare Project Procedures Manual, which includes items such as team roles, communication and safety protocols, document storage, and QA/QC plan Document County expectations with client survey PROJECT CONTROLS: BUDGET & SCHEDULE MANAGEMENT We are committed to timely completion of this project on budget. Bill, Nick, and our task leads will quickly communicate project issues to staff. Create baseline schedule for the project, including milestones Utilize financial management software to track budgets PROJECT CONTROLS: RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN AND RISK REGISTER We will mitigate the County’s risk by identifying, tracking, and mitigating potential project risk, as well as identifying opportunities to reduce risk early in the project. Develop a Risk Management Plan Track project risk and opportunities using a Project Risk Register Identify potential strategies for mitigating risk and ways to capitalize on opportunities PROJECT CONTROLS: PROGRESS REPORTING We will keep the County well informed on how all projects are progressing with monthly progress meetings, in-person workshop meetings, and milestone deliverable meetings. Provide monthly invoices & progress reports that document work completed, potential issues, and forecasted activities Hold monthly progress meetings with County Provide the County with a List of Action Items FILE TRANSFER TOOLS We will provide the County all project documentation, including large model outputs, GIS, and CADD files, in formats that are compatible with the County. Provide the County with milestone deliverables Ensure all project-related documentation is received QUALITY CONTROL/PROJECT CONTROLS We will integrate QA/QC procedures through every level of our services, ensuring technical feasibility, innovation, and compliance with the County’s objectives. Provide concentrated, rigorous reviews (including constructability reviews) at key milestones in the projects Integrate use of Subject Matter Experts into the production of technically challenging work elements CLIENT SURVEY AND PROJECT CLOSE- OUT We will ensure staff implement the Quality Plan and that the County is satisfied with project deliverables. Jacobs will provide a brief client survey to verify County’s satisfaction with deliverables Conduct close-out meeting with the County Exhibit 4.1 Our Project Management Commitment to Collier County Page 1285 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 4 - 6 4. PROJECT APPROACH, WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET REQUIREMENTS Demonstrated Success Managing Costs on Past County Projects Cost Control We will focus on two critical areas: on-time decision making and top-quality, committed project staffing. Specific strategies we will implement to control project design and construction costs include: Conduct task-specific workshops with County staff to discuss and evaluate project elements. Early integration of County staff into the design process will allow us to evaluate deliverables during development as opposed to milestone submittals thereby minimizing surprises and reducing late changes. Bi-Weekly or monthly internal team meetings to discuss tasks requiring additional manpower, items ready for quality review, and the most efficient approaches to upcoming work tasks. Close and early coordination with project stakeholders to avoid negative project image by agencies or public. Establishing construction cost estimates based on current FDOT Data and adjusting data based on local bidding environment, refining those estimates as design proceeds. Quality control, spearheaded by QA/QC team members to provide input throughout the project. Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) At Jacobs, quality is more than a service we provide. Quality is a critical piece of successful project delivery. Our Quality Control Process is guided by the principle that all team members are responsible for quality. As part of our Quality Control Process, we assign senior reviewers who are independent of the project and have the experience to provide concentrated, rigorous reviews throughout the project. Our senior reviewers are subject matter experts in roadway, structures, and drainage, and were selected due to their successful completion of similar design projects. Formal quality control reviews are performed prior to draft and final deliverables. These reviews concentrate on issues of consistency, completeness, clarity, coordination, constructability (when applicable), and cost effectiveness. Quality assurance reviews are performed to assure the deliverables will, on completion, conform to the specified requirements and meet your expectations. Collier County SUBMITTAL TO COLLIER COUNTY Exhibit 4.2 Our Proven Five-Step Quality Process Avoids Costly Rework and Overruns Page 1286 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 4 - 7 4. PROJECT APPROACH, WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET REQUIREMENTS Exhibit 4-3 Project Schedule Page 1287 of 5277 Page 1288 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 5 -1 5. LOCATION Local Team Members Within Minutes of County Offices and the Project Site Providing the County with appropriately skilled, highly responsive personnel requires a locally based team that brings superior technical capabilities and project management experience to meet the unique requirements of this critical project.Our Naples office, located less than 7 miles from the County offices and less than 30 minutes to the project site, serves as the principal and coordinating office for this contract.As needed, we will draw on the technical expertise of staff from our other Florida offices, who bring recent and relevant experience providing services on Collier County transportation planning, design, and construction projects, as well as Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization and FDOT District 1 projects. Two of our core subconsultant team members, Johnson Engineering and Capital Consulting Services, are also in Collier County, a short drive from our Naples office. Ardaman & Associates’ main office is located in Lee County. Environmental Science Associates will provide services from their Tampa offices, AHC team members will provide services from their office in Davie, Florida, and I.F. Rooks & Associates, LLC. are located in Plant City, Florida. See Exhibit 5-1 below. Approach to Management and Execution of Work Project Manager, Bill Gramer, PE, AICP, will lead day-to-day management and coordination. Bill has the authority and resources to deliver all services that may be required throughout preparation of the design plans and construction documents and all related tasks required for this project. Bill has over 37 years of experience on a wide variety of transportation and transit projects, including planning, traffic, roadway, drainage, utility, environmental, minor local roadways, major urban arterials, state routes, and interstate highways. Bill has expertise in project management, roadway and transit studies and design, bicycle and pedestrian plans (including designing over 100 miles of sidewalks, pathways, and bicycle lanes), design-build criteria packages, underground utility design and relocations, Project Development and Environment (PD&E) studies, and community outreach. He has managed more than 50 public involvement meetings and well over 100 project stakeholder meetings. Bill will work with Principal-in-Charge Joseph Martin, PE and Deputy Project Manager, Nick De Ciccio, PE, to ensure that appropriately skilled staff are readily available to deliver all services required to complete this project throughout the duration of the contract. Exhibit 5-1:Proximity of Our Core Team Page 1289 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 5 -2 5. LOCATION Project Stakeholders Communication Process Coordination between our team members, County staff, the public, affected property owners and stakeholders such as utility agencies, SFWMD, FDOT (SUN Trail Network Project – FDIP 455291-1-22-01) and CCPS must be consistent and continuous to successfully bring the Everglades Boulevard Widening Design project to reality. Bill’s extensive Collier County experience and specific experience on Wilson Boulevard Widening,Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, and Oil Well Road makes him the best resource to lead and coordinate the various tasks required to complete this project on schedule and within budget. He will meet face-to-face with our subconsultant partners regularly, making sure we take a fully integrated team approach to this project. Bill applies proven methods to successfully manage communication, people, and resources. Efficient communication between our team and the County is essential to establishing project goals and performance standards early in the project. We’ll communicate continuously with your staff in written format (i.e., email, memos, and letters) as official direction to avoid misinterpretations. Proactive communication with the County and project stakeholders will also help identify issues and concerns that need to be resolved early. Project Kick-Off, Planning, and Operations Upon Notice to proceed, we will hold a project kickoff meeting with all team members and County staff outlining the path forward. Bill will be responsible for day-to-day coordination, holding regular staff meetings and issuing frequent action item reports to document required actions. As Deputy Project Manager, Nick De Ciccio, PE will work with task managers to ensure project elements are well coordinated and receive a proper QA/QC prior to delivering milestones to the County. We will submit technical memoranda and monthly progress reports to County staff for review as the project progresses. Using technical memoranda and monthly progress reports has proven effective in achieving an orderly flow of work on past projects. This approach provides concise, detailed data and the ability to track action items and the record of decisions made throughout the life of the project. Project-Specific Work Plan We understand the importance of developing a detailed, task-specific work plan for this project that provides the appropriate level of management, reporting, and communication. Bill will meet with County staff once work is authorized to proceed. At this meeting, we establish clear lines of communication and review and finalize the project work plan. Planning is crucial to project success. A quality work plan defines all roles and responsibilities and describes how team knowledge and skills will be used to meet the project requirements. Development of the work plan is essential because it helps the team work together efficiently. Effective instruction in the work plan eliminates cost overruns, schedule slippages, and ineffective personnel assignments, while also promoting quality results. Our sophisticated computer network allows us to transfer documents and share project information between our Naples office and other Jacobs’ offices quickly and cost-effectively. Through Microsoft Teams or Zoom, we can easily host teleconferences and review meetings with County staff and remote team staff. Bill Gramer has assisted Collier County since 2002 on more than 15 roadway projects, many within the project area (see Exhibit 3-1 and Exhibit 3-2 in Section 3). In addition, many of the staff and all of the subconsultants chosen for this project have contributed to relevant Collier County roadway projects such as Vanderbilt Beach Rd Extension, Vanderbilt Beach Rd Widening, Oil Well Rd Widening Segments I,II, &III, Collier Blvd Widening I,II, &III and the ongoing Wilson Blvd Widening Design. This unparalleled experience will prove invaluable for this complex project, expediting project delivery and avoiding rework resulting from pursuing previously vetted and dismissed alternatives from similar projects. Exhibit 5-2 Florida Office Locations Map Page 1290 of 5277 Page 1291 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 6 - 1 6. RECENT, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED WORKLOADS OF THE FIRM Available Resources and Current and Projected Workload Our team members have served Collier County on dozens of major projects in the last 30 years, and we’re ready to partner with you again on this project. We fully understand the scope of services requirements and have the resources to begin work immediately. Our team thoroughly understands the processes required to successfully complete the tasks outlined in Section 4 (Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements). Jacobs commits to making the resources available to deliver the Everglades Boulevard Widening Design project on time and within budget. Commitment of Key Team Members Our team members were selected for their proven experience delivering similar projects for Collier County and for other Southwest Florida clients, reputation for providing top-quality service, and ability to commit to this project for its duration. Collier County has been a priority client for Jacobs for the last 20+ years, as many of our staff members are County residents. Your success is our success, and we are fully committed to making the place where we live and work the best it can be. As members of the Naples community, our team has a vested interest in quickly and efficiently completing projects that help our County meet its transportation infrastructure goals. Availability of Key Team Members We analyzed our existing projects and projected work, as well as that of our subconsultant partners, and can assure the County that we have the depth of staff needed to begin work immediately. Our team is composed of qualified planners, engineers, scientists, and construction phase personnel, and we’re supported by an extensive pool of firm-wide resources who are available to provide services to the County.Exhibit 6-1 and Exhibit 6-2 on the following pages show key team members’ availability to support this project. Our team is fully committed to providing the County quality deliverables for the duration of this contract. Project Manager, Bill Gramer, working in collaboration with our Naples-based team members, will ensure that appropriate staff is available to meet any project needs the County may request at any time under this contract. Our team has been carefully crafted to make sure there are overlaps in all disciplines, which means no gaps in experience, knowledge, or availability. As shown in Exhibit 6- 1, the Jacobs team has excess availability for the duration of this project. The staff, project roles, current commitments, availability, and requirements for this project are detailed below. As you can see from Exhibit 6-2, the current and projected commitments of our project management staff, task leads, and technical staff are such that this project is critical to our team’s future workload. Our project management staff and task leads average more than 50 percent availability for all disciplines, bolstering our team’s efficient and effective coordination and project delivery. Our current workload is such that this project aligns perfectly with our team’s availability.The core team from our Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening Project and Collier Boulevard Widening Project, which will finish design by end of 2024 and early 2025 respectively, is ready to transition to this project.Bill Gramer and Nick De Ciccio are the project manager and deputy project manager for these two projects, and therefore will have availability for this Everglades Boulevard Widening project. Based on the procurement schedule, the Everglades Boulevard project will likely begin design in May of 2025.The Jacobs team will be ready! Jacobs’ unique staffing structure will allow our management team to allocate staff to support the early project requirements, such as roadway design refinement and drainage modeling, while other key technical staff will be made available for later project stages. Our Jacobs team has a proven recipe that has repeatedly delivered successful projects for Collier County! Page 1292 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 6 - 2 6. RECENT, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED WORKLOADS OF THE FIRM Our team has been carefully crafted to make sure that there will be no gaps in experience, knowledge, and availability. The staff, project roles, current commitments, availability, and requirements for this project are detailed below, clearly showing that the Jacobs team has excess availability for the duration of this project. Exhibit 6-1. Average Staff Availability for Key Personnel (May 2025 to May 2027) Page 1293 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 6 - 3 6. RECENT, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED WORKLOADS OF THE FIRM Exhibit 6-1. Average Staff Availability for Key Personnel (May 2025 to May 2027), cont. Page 1294 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 6 - 4 6. RECENT, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED WORKLOADS OF THE FIRM Exhibit 6-1. Average Staff Availability for Key Personnel (May 2025 to May 2027), cont. As you can see from Exhibit 6-1, the current and projected commitments of our project management staff, task leads, and technical staff are such that this project is critical to our team’s future workload. Our project management staff and task leads average more than 50 percent availability for all disciplines, bolstering our team’s efficient and effective coordination and project delivery. Exhibit 6-2. Average Staff Availability for Project Management (May 2025 to May 2027) COMITTED AVAILABLE Ray Dechert ROW Mapping 40%60% Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP MOT & TTC; Graphics 60%40% Nathan Shay Traffic Data & Modeling 40%60% Mike Mulbarger Noise Study 50%50% Ryan Horstman Noise Study 50%50% Robert Carr Archaeological/Historical 50%50% Ryan Franklin, PhD Archaeological/Historical 50%50% John Beriault Archaeological/Historical 50%50% Ivan Sokolic, PE Geotechnical & Lab Testing 50%50% Cory Schulte, EI Geotechnical & Lab Testing 50%50% Dave Mckay, PSM, CP Photogrammetric 50%50% David Vineyard, CP Photogrammetric 50%50% Team Member Role AVG. PERCENT TECHNICAL TEAMPage 1295 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 6 - 5 6. RECENT, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED WORKLOADS OF THE FIRM Exhibit 6-3:Resource Loaded Project Schedule The “Resource Loaded Project Schedule”shown below, aligns with Jacobs proposed Project Schedule shown in Exhibit 4-3. This schedule defines when staff will be required during each milestone of the project. As shown in the section,our staff has excess availability to complete the serves required for this project. This tool will serve as the basis for developing staff hour estimates and will help expedite project negotiations. Page 1296 of 5277 Page 1297 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -1 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1298 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -2 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1299 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -3 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1300 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -4 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1301 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -5 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1302 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -6 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1303 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -7 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1304 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -8 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1305 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -9 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1306 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -10 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1307 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -11 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1308 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -12 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1309 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -13 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1310 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -14 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1311 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -15 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1312 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -16 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1313 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -17 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1314 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -18 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1315 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -19 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1316 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -20 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1317 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -21 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1318 of 5277 Page 1319 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page B -1 APPENDIX B: LICENSES Collier County Business Tax License – Engineering Business Collier County Business Tax License – Administrative Office Page 1320 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page B -2 APPENDIX B: LICENSES Page 1321 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page B -3 APPENDIX B: LICENSES Page 1322 of 5277 Page 1323 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C: RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 1 EDUCATION/ QUALIFICATIONS BS, Civil Engineering, Polytechnic University, NY REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer: FL (License No. 59090) Certified Planner: AICP (#314390) YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 37 TEAM MEMBER RESUMES — KEY PERSONNEL Bill Gramer,PE, AICP PROJECT MANAGER (JACOBS) Bill brings more than 37 years of experience managing and coordinating a wide variety of transportation and transit projects, including planning, traffic, roadway, drainage, utility, environmental, small local roadways, major urban arterials, state routes, and interstate highways. Bill has managed or coordinated 15 of our firm’s major Collier County roadway projects and 15 general service contracts. In addition, he has managed or coordinated 45 different general service contracts for clients throughout Florida. Bill has expertise in project management, roadway and transit studies and design, bicycle and pedestrian plans (including experience designing over 100 miles of sidewalks, pathways, and bicycle lanes), design- build criteria packages, underground utility design/relocations, Project Development and Environment (PD&E) studies, and community outreach. He has also managed over 40 public involvement meetings and over 100 project stakeholder meetings. Selected Projects Project Manager. Wilson Boulevard Widening - Design & Corridor Study, Collier County. Collier County, FL. Jacobs conducted a study to evaluate potential roadway corridor improvements to widen Wilson Boulevard from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road in northern Collier County. Specifically, the study evaluated widening Wilson Boulevard from a two-lane undivided facility to a four-lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. This study included the development of alternatives, a comparative evaluation of the social and environmental effects, and the overall cost of each option. The project also included adding sidewalks, a shared-use path, and bike lanes and enhancing the existing bus stops. As PM, Bill managed the alternatives analysis to determine the best-suited alignment for Wilson Boulevard, which considered impacts to residential and commercial properties and impacts to the existing County production wells along the project corridor. Bill managed several successful workshops with the County regarding a left, center, and right alignment and the associated impacts, as well as additional ROW required. Bill managed an extensive public involvement process, which included a public meeting, social media engagement, mailer/newsletter, the project website, and an online survey with several public-friendly exhibits to portray project alternatives, such as complex 3D designs and renderings to show design features of the recommended alternative. Bill successfully presented the results of the study and recommendation for approval to the Board of County Commissioners. Bill is currently managing the design of Wilson Boulevard Widening. Project Manager. Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Design, Collier County, FL.Bill managed the design of a new 7-mile, six-lane roadway from Collier Boulevard to 16th St. NE. Providing public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, maintenance of traffic (MOT), structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. Project Manager. Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study, Collier County, FL. Bill managed a congestion analysis for future (5-year and 20-year) conditions along an approximately 2.3-mile segment along Immokalee Road from of Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard, including nine intersections. Jacobs obtained traffic counts, evaluated surrounding land use, and projected traffic forecasts along the corridor and at the intersections for existing (2019), 2025, and 2040 conditions. Due to the severe congestion projected and limited right-of-way (ROW) available, the team performed an alternatives analysis evaluating both conventional and innovative alternatives at each of the intersections. The team modeled the corridor in SYNCHRO software by Trafficware to conduct the analysis for delay, volume to capacity ratio, and level of service for existing and future conditions for the no-build and build scenarios. Types of innovative improvements evaluated at each of the nine intersections included a continuous flow intersection (CFI), jug handle, single point urban interchange (SPUI), restricted crossing U-Turn (R-CUT), diverging diamond interchange (DDI), median U-turn (MUT), and Continuous Green-T. The team prepared concepts for the recommended improvements at each intersection and along the corridor. Concepts with innovative solutions included: Page 1324 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C: RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 2 –SPUI at Livingston Road –CFI at Strand Boulevard and Juliet Boulevard –DDI at the I-75 interchange –CFI and SPUI at Logan Boulevard Project Manager. Collier-Immokalee Intersection Improvements Design, Collier County, FL.Bill managed intersection improvements to the Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard Intersection, which will provide additional capacity to the intersection and extend Collier Boulevard north by about a half mile. The intersection improvements were planned and designed to accommodate a future SPUI at this intersection. Services included roadway alternatives analysis, roadway design, drainage design, sidewalks, bike lanes, pathways, canal relocation, prefabricated bridge crossing of canal, box culvert extension, signalization, lighting, utility design, coordination with FPL for relocation of transmission and distribution lines and permitting. Project Manager. Tree Farm Road Phase II Design, Collier County, FL.Bill managed the design for the half-mile segment of Tree Farm Road. This two-lane roadway section links four roadways with a new roundabout. Design included a new two-lane new roadway with sidewalks, pathways, bike lanes, and a new roundabout. He managed water main and force main design and permitting. The project used three adjacent development ponds for stormwater treatment and attenuation. Project Manager. Collier Boulevard III – Phase I (Golden Gate Boulevard to Green Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL.Bill managed the widening of 2 miles of the existing four-lane, urban, divided roadway. Managed a multi-firm team providing public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, MOT, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. Project Manager. Collier Boulevard III – Phase II (Golden Gate Canal to Green Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL.Bill managed the widening of 2 miles of the existing four-lane, urban, divided roadway. His responsibilities included managing a multi-firm team providing public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, MOT, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. This project is currently on hold at 60%. Project Manager/Coordinator. Collier Boulevard II (US 41 to Davis Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL.Bill coordinated and managed this design project involving roadway capacity improvements to a 7-mile segment from US 41 to Davis Boulevard. Managed preparation of design plans and specifications for widening the existing four-lane roadway to a six-lane facility, including four major intersections. Permits included the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Project Coordinator. Oil Well Road Widening and Reconstruction, Collier County, FL.Bill coordinated design and permitting for the widening and reconstruction of 11.1 miles of Oil Well Road. The project involved widening a two-lane rural section to a four-lane and-six lane urban section. The project included extensive public involvement due to impacts to environmentally sensitive areas as well as heavily developed sections of the corridor. The permitting included drainage and environmental impacts as well as wildlife crossings for endangered species such as the Florida Panther. Our team prepared a bridge design report and design and plans for three bridge replacements, two box culvert extensions, and miscellaneous structures. Project Manager. Collier Boulevard I (Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road) Design, Collier County, FL.Bill managed the Collier Boulevard (CR 951) project that involved widening three miles of the existing two-lane roadway to a six-lane, urban, divided roadway from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. He led public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, MOT, structural design, environmental impacts, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. Permits included SFWMD, USACE, and FDEP. Project Manager. Vanderbilt Beach Road (Airport-Pulling Road to Collier Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL.Bill managed the widening of 5.5 miles of the existing two-lane roadway to a six-lane, urban, divided roadway. The project required extensive attention to public concerns regarding local access, circulation, traffic demands, impacts to businesses and residential areas, and aesthetics. Project Manager. Immokalee Road (Collier Boulevard to 43rd Avenue NE) Design, Collier County, FL.Bill managed this design project that involved the 8.1-mile widening of Immokalee Road from two to six lanes. He managed complete roadway design, permitting services, drainage design, wetland mitigation, water and force main design, signal design, roadway lighting, traffic studies, and services during construction. Project Manager. Pine Ridge Road (Airport- Pulling Road to Logan Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL.Managed this design project involving widening Pine Ridge Road from four to six lanes and converting the existing rural section to an urban section. The 3.3-mile project included widening Pine Ridge Road through the I-75 interchange. One unique aspect of the project was the redesign of the northbound on- and off-ramps to accommodate dual left-turn lanes. Project Manager/Coordinator. Webber Street (McIntosh Road to Cattleman Road) Design, Sarasota County, FL.Bill managed and coordinated design for this two-mile, four-lane divided collector roadway including bicycle lanes, a grassed center median with streetscaping, retaining walls, a 200-foot bridge (Phillippi Creek), major crossroad culverts, privacy walls for residences, intersection improvements, traffic control devices, a closed storm drain system to serve the roadway, stormwater system to intercept runoff from private properties adjacent to the roadway, pond design compensation for filling within the 100-year flood plain, and facilities for mitigation of environmental and neighborhood impacts. Project Manager. Pine Street (Dearborn St. to US41) Design, Sarasota County, FL.Bill managed new roadway design for as a six-lane divided arterial with a majority of the alignment using a rural section. Led preparation of preliminary and final design drawings, geotechnical investigations, obtaining environmental and drainage permits, traffic signal design, preparation of right-of- way plans, and surveying. The project was developed in stages, with the first 3,000- foot section designed to 100% plans. The project involved extensive wetland mitigation along with mitigation for the Florida Scrub Jay. Page 1325 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C: RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 3 Transportation Planning Project Experience Project Manager. Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan, Collier County, FL.Bill managed this project with the Collier MPO to complete the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan update identifying implementable projects through 2045. The update includes developing a land use alternative and socioeconomic data for 2045; analyzing modeling results; recommending alternative projects; developing costs for these projects; refining goals, objectives, policies, and performance measures; evaluating potential projects; developing a Needs Plan and Cost Feasible Plan; and completing long-range transportation plan (LRTP) documentation. The team initiated a virtual public engagement program to reach out the stakeholders, agency representatives, elected officials, and the community during the update. Project Manager. Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road Corridor Study, Collier County, FL. Bill managed an environmental and engineering study to evaluate potential roadway network improvements near Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road in Collier County. The purpose was to develop an east-west corridor to reduce congestion and improve traffic flow and accommodate future travel demand through 2045. He led evaluation of potential improvements to existing Randall Boulevard, Oil Well Road, Desoto Boulevard, and Everglades Boulevard, as well as potential corridors on a new alignment. Bill managed development of alternatives and a comparative evaluation of the social and environmental effects and the overall cost of each option. The study considered traffic operation improvements including roundabouts, grade-separated overpasses, frontage roadways, access management, and new traffic signal locations for the recommended alternative. The study blended preliminary engineering, environmental impact assessments, public outreach and agency coordination. Managed public involvement, data collection and projections, development of corridor alternatives, development of evaluation methodology and criteria, analysis and ranking of corridor alternatives, and selection of a preferred corridor alternative. Project Coordinator. Immokalee Road at Randall Boulevard Intersection PD&E Study, Collier County, FL.The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 1 initiated a PD&E study to evaluate proposed improvements at the intersection of Immokalee Road (County Road [CR] 846) and Randall Boulevard in Collier County. These intersection capacity improvements are needed to accommodate projected future traffic demand. The proposed project will improve future intersection operations and result in enhanced mobility and safety. Intersection improvements will also increase regional transportation network connectivity, reduce crashes, improve operations on existing evacuation routes, and expand multi-modal access to pedestrian and bicycle traffic in the area. The team prepared an initial alternatives technical memorandum to document the need for the project, develop intersection improvement alternatives, and conduct a preliminary comparative evaluation based on engineering constraints, environmental effects, and preliminary cost estimates. Proposed alternatives include at-grade alternatives and grade- separated alternatives to increase the intersection capacity. Project Manager. Collier Boulevard Alignment Study, Collier County, FL.Bill managed a comprehensive analysis to determine the type, design, and location of proposed future improvements to Collier Boulevard (CR 951) from US 41 to Immokalee Road, approximately 15 miles. The team developed and analyzed various typical sections and roadway geometry and evaluated drainage and utility adjustment requirements, site constraints, and preliminary environmental and ROW requirements for a six-lane urban divided section with bike lanes, sidewalks, and stormwater management facilities. Project Manager. Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Corridor Study, Collier County, FL. Bill managed a corridor study to investigate the feasibility of extending Vanderbilt Beach Road by approximately 10 miles. The initial objective of the study was to identify existing and future transportation demands along the fast-growing extension corridor. That led to creation of conceptual new alignment alternatives that would potentially relieve existing congestion and accommodate future traffic volumes. He led evaluation of alternatives for their traffic impacts, cost-effectiveness, impacts to area businesses and residents, environmental impacts, and consistency with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Bill managed extensive ROW investigations to determine potential impacts of 15 different corridor alternatives. Project Manager. Miscellaneous Planning Services, Collier County, FL.Bill led the efforts for a variety of transportation planning and engineering services for the Collier MPO and Collier County Planning Department under Jacobs (then CH2M’s) general services contracts spanning from 2004 to the present. Services have included roadway planning and conceptual designs, intersection improvement concept development, grant application preparation, project cost estimate development, and coordination with FDOT 1 for proposed improvements. Project Manager. Old US 41 Redevelopment Complete Streets Concepts, City of Bonita Springs, FL.Bill managed conceptual roadway and stormwater designs for Old US 41 from Bonita Beach Road to W. Terry Street. Evaluated alternatives for roadway, bike lanes, pathways, sidewalks, access management, and stormwater improvements. The concepts included roundabout designs at Pennsylvania Avenue and W. Terry Street. Page 1326 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C: RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 4 Sidewalk/Pathway Project Experience Project Manager. Golden Gate Collector Sidewalks and Sunshine Boulevard Sidewalks and Pedestrian Bridge Local Agency Program (LAP) Projects, Collier County, FL.Bill managed design and final design document preparation for constructing a 6-foot sidewalk on the south side of Golden Gate Parkway. He led County coordination, quantities and engineer’s estimate of cost preparation, utility coordination, and post-design services. Design complies with FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards (“Florida Green Book” criteria). Senior Advisor. Golden Gate City Walkable Community Study, Collier MPO, Collier County, FL.Bill advised a study that sought to develop a prioritized list of sidewalk and pedestrian amenity projects to promote and enhance walkability, bicycle use, transit use, and social equity throughout the community. The study used field data collection, community engagement, quantitative and qualitative technical analyses, and best practices to develop and validate prioritized recommendations for a more walkable, safer, and healthier community. When implemented, the recommendations will result in a community where mobility options, safety, social engagement, and a “sense of place” are the foundation of the neighborhood. Project Manager. Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) Grant Application – Immokalee Complete Streets, Collier County Planning, Collier County, FL. Bill managed preparation of a TIGER grant application for the Immokalee Complete Street. He managed preparation of grant application, exhibits, estimates, benefit-cost analysis, and all required documentation. Project was successful and resulted in a $13,132,691 grant. Project Manager. Complete Streets Design-Build Criteria Package for TIGER Grant Application, Lee County MPO, Lee County, FL.Bill managed the conceptual design for the 11 planned projects listed in the Complete Streets Initiative TIGER Grant application. He led preparation of conceptual plans and typical sections that defined project features such as sidewalks, pathways, bike lanes, shoulders; quantities and project estimates; conceptual design; and construction schedule. Project Manager. Safe Routes to School Grant Application, Collier County, FL.Bill helped the County develop a successful Safe Routes to School Grants for Eden Elementary. Prepared conceptual roadway plans, typical sections location maps, existing condition map, student location map, and proof of ROW and analyzed crash data and traffic data. Evaluated field conditions with representatives from FDOT and Collier County. They received $717,071 through Safe Routes to School Funding under the requirements of the Local Agency Program (LAP). Project Manager. Safe Routes to School Grant Application, Collier County, FL.Bill helped the County develop a successful Safe Routes to School Grants (Shadowlawn Elementary). Prepared conceptual roadway plans, typical sections location maps, existing condition map, student location map, proof of right-of-way, and analyzed crash data and traffic data. He also evaluated field conditions with representatives from FDOT and Collier County. They received $851,459 through Safe Routes to School Funding under LAP requirements. Project Manager. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Surveys, Collier County, FL.Bill is managing physical surveys of 363 various County structures located on 127 sites (over 2.1million square feet). The surveys include a report of findings regarding ADA compliance and a statement of probable construction cost for remediation of any ADA items found out of compliance. Transit Project Experience Project Manager. FTA 5339 Fiscal Year 2015 and 2016 Bus Stop Improvements, FDOT. Florida.Bill managed design and preparation of final design documentation for nine bus stops throughout Collier County. The project ensured all federal guidelines as outlined in the ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Transportation Facilities are met per code and added bus shelters for each site. Bus stops meet the latest design standards as detailed in the 2012 Florida Accessibility Code (Florida Building Code, Chapter 11). He managed preparation of itemized quantities and engineer’s opinion of probable cost, preparation of bid-form and RFP bid-package, plan quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC), and services during construction. Project Manager. Bus Shelter Planning and Design, Collier County, FL.Bill managed various services related to the planning and design of two new bus shelters for their Collier Area Transit bus system. The work involved assisting the Alternative Transportation Modes staff in developing and evaluating various bus shelter alternatives to improve the existing bus shelters’ passenger comfort and convenience (e.g., standing areas, seating, protection from sun and rain, and information). He prepared a bus shelter alternatives technical memorandum and bus shelter amenities survey questionnaire. He also prepared for and attended the Public Transit Ad Hoc Advisory Committee meetings. Project Manager. Bus Shelter Design to Achieve ADA Compliance, Collier County, FL. Bill managed preparation of plans, details, quantities, specifications, cost estimates, and bidding and services during construction for site modifications required to bring 50 bus stops located along the state highway system in Collier County up to ADA compliance. Designed bus stops to meet federal guidelines as outlined in the ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Transportation Facilities. Site/Civil Project Experience Project Coordinator. Gordon River Water Quality Park, Collier County, FL.Bill was directly involved in the creation of this 50-acre constructed treatment wetland and public park. Project involves a rare consortium of government agencies and municipalities that joined together to design and build a constructed wetland facility that will provide flood attenuation and stormwater treatment for a two-square-mile urban watershed. Page 1327 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C: RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 5 EDUCATION/ QUALIFICATIONS BS, Civil Engineering, University of Miami REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer: Florida (License No. 47621) MEMBERSHIPS/ AFFILIATIONS Member, WTS Central Florida Chapter YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 36 Joseph Martin,PE PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE (JACOBS) Joe brings extensive experience in designing and managing complex, major limited access highways, and minor highway projects. His expertise includes geometric design, drainage design, signing and pavement markings (S&PM), utility design and coordination, construction engineering and inspection, and all elements required to successfully deliver a project. His six years spent as a construction Design- Build (DB) Manager for heavy civil highway contractors provides him with the versatility and unique ability to develop designs that are practical, facilitate construction to avoid claims, and provide innovation to achieve quality, cost savings, and maintainability making him the ideal project manager for your project. Selected Projects Project Manager. FDOT District 4, SR 806/Atlantic Avenue from West SR 7/US 441 to East of Lyons Road, Palm Beach County, FL.Complete reconstruction and canal relocation that modified an existing 2-lane undivided roadway to a 4-lane divided roadway while maintaining availability for the ultimate six-lane section. Joe coordinated all design disciplines including roadway, drainage, S&PM, TTCP, lighting, signalization, and right-of-way (ROW) acquisition. Project Manager. FDOT District 4, Continuing Services for LAP Project Delivery, City of Fort Lauderdale West Lake Drive Bridge Replacement, Broward County, FL.The project includes the replacement of three bridges over water along West Lake Drive in Fort Lauderdale. Phase 1 is completed, which included extensive stakeholder coordination to establish the bridge aesthetics, span arrangement, vertical clearances, and roadway to residential driveway connections. Joe coordinated all design disciplines, including roadway, structural, drainage, S&PM, TTCP, and ROW acquisition. Design/DB Project Manager. FDOT District 4, I-95 and Spanish River Boulevard Interchange, Palm Beach County, FL.Joe was responsible for direct supervision of roadway, drainage, maintenance of traffic, and S&PM design teams for the new interchange of Spanish River Boulevard on I-95. This included the construction of a new interchange, modification to the existing Yamato Road and I-95 interchange, addition of auxiliary lanes from Glades Road to Congress Avenue on I-95, and cross-street improvements for Spanish River and Yamato Road. The three-level interchange included coordination with the FAA, Boca Raton Airport, the City of Boca Raton, and Florida Atlantic University. Joe was Project Manager during the conventional design project and the Project Manager when the project was changed to DB. He was responsible for preparing the RFP Criteria Package and providing technical support to the FDOT through the DB procurement process. Project Manager. FDOT District 4, SR 7 Roadway Construction from Lake Worth Road to Southern Boulevard, Palm Beach County, FL.Joe was responsible for the direct supervision of the roadway design, drainage design, maintenance of traffic, and S&PM design teams. This project included the reconstruction of SR 7 from a 2-lane rural section to a 6-lane divided roadway within the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) C- 51 drainage basin. The drainage design was key to the project's success, with zero stormwater discharge allowed by SFWMD. Project Manager FDOT District 4, SR 5 Roadway Reconstruction from North Lake Boulevard to Port of Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, FL.Joe was responsible for the direct supervision of the roadway, drainage, maintenance of traffic, and S&PM design teams. This project included the reconstruction of a concrete roadway within a highly urbanized area and a large-diameter clay storm sewer system. The typical section included the incorporation of aesthetic medians and the addition of a city water main. This project involved significant community awareness issues and coordination with discharge to the Lake Worth Lagoon. DB Project Manager. FDOT District 4, Bridges of Isles on Las Olas, Broward County, FL. Joe was responsible for the design and construction coordination, including replacing five structurally deficient bridges. The existing two-lane bridges were the only access points to islands, creating TCP challenges to maintain continuous access and containing historical components. Joe’s responsibilities included managing the design consultant and construction technical teams to ensure the preliminary and final designs were innovative, cost-effective, and enhanced efficiency. Page 1328 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C: RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 6 Continued:Joseph Martin,PE DB Project Manager. Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX), SR 836 Ultimate from NW 57th Avenue to NW 17th Avenue, Miami-Dade County FL.Joe was responsible for the design and construction coordination of 4.7 miles of limited access mainline roadway widening to an ultimate 8-lane roadway typical section, which included 9 new bridges, 21 bridge widenings, 2 diverging diamond interchanges, 3 CD roads, and 5 arterial road crossings. Joe’s responsibilities included managing the design consultant and construction technical teams to ensure proper design implementation. Innovative and cost-effective solutions were vetted to enhance efficiency and being hands-on with construction personnel to identify issues in the design and construction planning phases ensured constructability. Joe was also responsible for addressing any changed field conditions with innovative solutions to best serve the client and the public while maintaining the contractor’s budget and schedule without compromising safety, quality, or maintainability. Deputy Director. MDX, SR 826 and SR 836 Interchange, Miami-Dade County, FL;Joe was responsible for the plan review coordination of this complex DB interchange. He facilitated regular review meetings to ensure the fast-tracked engineering met FDOT and AASHTO geometry requirements. Plan submittals were phased and reviewed in phases per section/ramps. Joe’s responsibilities included swift design coordination and review with the large team of subconsultants. Project Manager. FDOT District 6, SR 826/Palmetto Expressway from East of NW 32nd Avenue to West of NW 17th Avenue – Segment 6, Miami-Dade County, FL.The purpose of this project was to relieve congestion on the SR 826 corridor by increasing capacity and improving system connectivity; enhancing safety by addressing operational, structural, and functional deficiencies; and providing additional travel options. Improvements included adding express lanes, auxiliary lanes, reconstruction of the mainline, and improvements to the existing interchanges. Joe’s responsibilities included coordinating adjacent project segments, improvements to the Golden Glades Interchange, and overseeing design disciplines. TTCP Discipline Manager. FDOT District 6, SR 826/Palmetto Expressway from East of NW 57th Avenue to East of NW 42nd Avenue – Segment 4, Miami-Dade County, FL. The purpose of this project was to relieve congestion on the SR 826 corridor by increasing capacity and improving system connectivity; enhancing safety by addressing operational, structural, and functional deficiencies; and providing additional travel options. Improvements included adding express lanes, auxiliary lanes, reconstruction of the mainline, and improvements to the existing interchanges. Joe’s responsibilities included managing the TTCP plans and coordinating with the adjacent segments. Project Manager. Palm Beach County Engineering, SR 7 Widening from Lake Worth Road to Belvedere Road, Palm Beach County, FL.Joe was responsible for overseeing the design and construction administration of the 6 to 8-lane widening project. He directly supervised the roadway design, including project management and coordinating Palm Beach County’s Public Facility Agreement and FDOT permitting requirements. In the construction phase, Joe’s responsibilities shifted to construction administration. His responsibilities included the supervision of field inspectors and project office engineers. DB Project Manager. FDOT Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Homestead Extension Florida Turnpike (HEFT) Widening from North of 72nd Street to North of Bird Road, Miami-Dade County, FL.Joe was responsible for the design and construction coordination of 2.25 miles of limited access mainline roadway widening to accommodate the addition of two NB and two SB Express Lanes, which included one new bridge, eight bridge widenings, a new AET mainline gantry, a one-way frontage road, and over one mile of arterial roadway widening. He managed the design consultant and construction technical teams to ensure the preliminary and final designs were innovative, cost-effective, and enhanced efficiency. Page 1329 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C: RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 7 Nick De Ciccio,PE DEPUTY PROJECT MANAGER (JACOBS) EDUCATION/ QUALIFICATIONS B.S., Civil Engineering, Florida Gulf Coast University, Estero, FL REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer: Florida (License No. 94489) YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 7 Nick has experience in transportation and site/civil projects. As a project manager and transportation project engineer, Nick has worked on an array of projects including traffic, roadway, transit, facilities, pedestrian bridge relocations and bridge replacement. Nick’s experience includes working on a successful TIGER grant application team, as well as two FDOT federally funded LAP projects. He has an excellent working relationship with Collier County’s growth management department, public works departments, Seminole Tribe of Florida, and extensive stakeholder interaction experience. Selected Projects Deputy Project Manager. Wilson Boulevard Widening Design, Collier County FL.Assisting with the design of widening an existing 2 lane rural roadway to a 4-lane urban roadway with bike lanes, bridge replacement, box culvert extension, multi-use pathway and sidewalk with an estimated construction cost of nearly $80M and a combined design fee and corridor study fee of nearly $6M. Specific responsibilities include creating roadway corridor linework, incorporating the adjacent Wilson Wellfield project along the corridor, conceptual design drawings, pond siting, wetland delineation, cost estimates, ROW mapping, and facilitating multiple public involvement and client workshop meetings. Deputy Project Manager. Collier Boulevard III Design, Collier County FL.Assisting with the design of widening an existing 2 lane rural roadway to a 4-lane urban roadway with bike lanes, bridge replacement, box culvert, multi-use pathway and sidewalk with an estimated construction cost of nearly $50M and a combined design fee and corridor study fee of nearly $6M. Specific responsibilities include creating roadway corridor linework, incorporating the adjacent Wilson Wellfield project along the corridor, conceptual design drawings, pond siting, wetland delineation, cost estimates, ROW mapping, and facilitating multiple public involvement and client workshop meetings. Deputy Project Manager. Vanderbilt Beach Road 6-Lane Widening, Collier County FL.Nick’s responsibilities included managing staff of various disciplines of the project. Additional key responsibilities include, maintaining project schedule, assisting with milestone delivery, and client relations, assisting with temporary traffic control, conceptual design drawings, stakeholder involvement, cost estimates, and facilitating multiple workshop meetings. The projects scope includes the median-widening design of 1.7 miles of an existing 4-lane roadway to a 6-lane facility with a design fee of $1.9M and an estimated construction cost of $30M. The widening will elevate traffic congestion for Vanderbilt Beach Road as well divert traffic from more congested roadways such as Immokalee Road and Pine Ridge Road. Project Manager. FY 23-24 Traffic Impact Study, Collier County FL.As the project manager, Nick is responsible for managing the projects budget and schedule. Nick is responsible for communicating with traffic engineers to ensure deliverable are being met. Nick is also the key point of contact for the project and is required to provide updates to the client. Traffic impact studies (TIS) reviews for concurrency analysis, consistency with the Collier County growth management plan, and development-related operational analyses. Jacobs is responsible for traffic and operational plan reviews and site plan reviews coordination with other municipalities, local and state agencies as required. Deputy Project Manager. Pine Ridge Road Corridor Design, Collier County FL. Specific responsibilities include creating roadway corridor linework alternatives, conceptual design drawings, cost estimate and cost benefit analyses, main electrical transmission utility relocation, technical memorandum, and delivery, and facilitating multiple client workshop meetings. Assisting with the design nearly 1.6 miles of innovative intersection alternatives at Pine Ridge Road and Livingston Road which include a Jughandle, Continuous Flow Intersection, and a Single Point Urban Interchange as well as evaluating an R-cut innovative intersection. The design fee is $2.62M with estimated construction costs for the three alternative innovative intersections ranging from $21M to $60M. Page 1330 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C: RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 8 Continued:Nick De Ciccio,PEContinued:Nick De Ciccio,PE Project Manager. Administrative Building “F” Planning and Feasibility Study, Collier County FL. Nick’s was responsible for managing the projects schedule and budget. As the project manager, Nick oversaw each of the discipline (structural, architectural, MEP/plumbing, Electrical) while also being the key point of contact for the client. Other responsibilities included QA/QC for the final reporting. The project value was to provide an overall assessment of the existing administration building “F” located at the Collier County government center. The building was originally constructed in 1973 has been the primary offices for the Collier County Commissioners and County Managers. Deputy Project Manager.Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study, Collier County FL. Assisting with the design of incorporating 3 innovative intersection improvements along Immokalee Road including a Continuous Flow Intersection, Diverging Diamond Interchange, and a Single Point Urban Interchange as well as conventional improvements to the other 6 intersections along the corridor’s limit, auxiliary lane design, box culvert extensions, and bridge replacements. Specific responsibilities include creating roadway corridor linework, conceptual design drawings, cost estimates, and facilitating multiple public involvement meetings. Project Manager. Del’s Corner Environmental Assessment, Collier County FL.As the project manager, Nick was the key point of contact for the client. Nick was responsible for maintaining a healthy project budget and schedule. Nick met with the Collier County client and environmental engineers at the project site to complete preliminary walkthroughs. Nick was present to oversee field sampling. Nick also assisted with review of reports for final delivery to client.After the Phase I ESA concluded that there are 2 Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) present, Collier County contracted Jacobs to provide phase II ESA Assessment. Major tasks for the project included planning, field sampling and reporting on findings. Project Manager. Naples Manor Sidewalks, Collier County FL.Responsibilities: Nick’s was responsible for the design and preparation of final design documents for constructing sidewalk along to segments, project A: construction of 6-foot- wide sidewalk on one side (south/west side) of Carolina Avenue from Warren Street to Broward Street (approx. 0.65 miles); identify and design necessary improvements to existing sidewalk and bus stop locations to achieve ADA Compliance and Project B: Construction of 6-foot wide sidewalk on one side of Warren Street from St. Andrews Blvd to Carolina Ave. (approx. 0.26 miles). Nick was also the project manager for the project and was the key point of contact for the client. Nick also managed the projects budget and schedule. The projects provided much needed connectivity to a high volume of pedestrian network in a residential area. Allowing pedestrians, a safe way to commute. Project Manager. East Naples Community Park Welcome Center, Collier County FL. Nick’s responsibilities included managing the design and post-design for the new construction of the ENCP Welcome Center. The new 6,000 SF Welcome Center is a one‐story containing pickleball pro-shop, offices, lockers/toilets, and office space. The project design included various AE disciplines such as structural, mechanical, electrical and fire protection/life safety. Nick’s responsibilities included overseeing all disciplines (Civil Engineering, Architectural, MEP, Electrical, Fire Protection/ Life Safety) and working to satisfy the client’s and stakeholders needs. East Naples Community Park is the host of the annual U.S. Open Pickleball tournament. The tournament brings in thousands of patrons and spectators and watch the tournament. The addition of the new Welcome Center provides an increase in restroom facilities for park users while also providing and cover patio area for spectators to watch the tournament. Deputy Project Manager. Palm River Blvd Bridge Replacement, Collier County FL.Nick was responsible for managing designs efforts to reconstruct the existing roadway to satisfy FDOT criteria. The project consists of a new 2-lane urban roadway with bike lanes, and a 6’ sidewalk on the east side of roadway. The project also involves replacement of existing Palm River Blvd Bridge. The new bridge is equipped with 11 ft lanes, paved shoulders, sidewalks, and pedestrian/ bicycle bullet railing. Additional responsibilities for this project include utility coordination, preparation of typical sections package, coordination with geotechnical engineering for boring data, coordination for SUE, and plans quality assurance and quality control. The original Palm River Bridge, built in 1960, provides direct access to 464 homes in the Palm River Estates, the River Royale and the Royal Palm Condominiums as well as the La Playa Golf Club. The project consisted of replacement of the existing bridge due its obsolete condition resulting from timber piles of unknown depth which are also experiencing exponential decay. Reconstruction of the bridge roadway approaches, to transition to the new bridge section and profile and construction of roadway drainage system. Project Engineer. Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, Collier County FL. Assisting with the design of a new 7 mile 6-Lane roadway corridor and 3 miles of Massey Street with a design fee of nearly $10M and construction cost of $153M. Specific responsibilities include creating conceptual design drawings, pond siting, wetland delineation, and facilitating public involvement meeting. Specific responsibilities include creating conceptual design drawings, pond siting, client workshops, wetland delineation, and facilitating multiple stakeholder involvement meetings. Page 1331 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C:RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 9 Ken Wooten,PE QA/QC – ROADWAY (JACOBS) EDUCATION/ QUALIFICATIONS BS, Environmental Engineering, University of Florida REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer: Florida (License No. 58817) YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 26 Ken has 24 years of roadway design and project management experience on multidisciplinary design projects and PD&E studies. He specializes in roadway design and planning for highway facilities, including interstate highways, interchanges, freeways, intersections, and urban and rural arterial roads. Ken brings comprehensive experience on transportation projects throughout Florida for FDOT and other clients, including Collier County. He led the roadway design for Collier County’s Oil Well Road project. Ken’s previous experience with Collier County and specific expertise in FDOT plan production requirements, including quantities, specifications, and electronic delivery, will add tremendous value to his role leading QA/QC for this project. Selected Projects Quality Manager. Carillon Intersection Improvements, City of St. Petersburg, FL.The project involved the development of proposed intersection alternatives at two intersections in St. Petersburg. The preferred alternatives included a roundabout at the intersection of Carillon Parkway with Tower Place and Echelon City Center and a signalized intersection at the intersection of Fountain Parkway with Echelon City Center and Baycreek Lane. In Phase 2, the team prepared design for the preferred alternatives. Roundabout design analyses included fastest path and design vehicle simulation. Quality Manager. SR 655/Recker Highway Construct a Bridge Spanning CSX RR Track in Polk County, FDOT District 1, FL.Ken was Quality Manager for a grade separation project to replace the existing CSX at-grade railroad crossing at SR 655/Recker Highway. Potential conflicts and crash potential will be eliminated with an overpass over the railroad for SR 655/Recker Highway and adjacent cross-streets. The proposed bridge will span from CSX ROW line to CSX ROW line and requires CSX coordination and approval. Improvements to US 92 include reconstruction of the SR 655/Recker Highway/US 92 intersection with high polymer asphalt pavement and milling and resurfacing to the east to Kelly Lane, where a U-turn movement is to be installed to mitigate driveway closures along SR 655/ Recker Highway, north of the CSX railroad crossing. Thornhill Road will be realigned to accommodate the grade separation along SR 655/Recker Highway. Quality Manager. SR 580/West Busch Boulevard Corridor Study, FDOT District 7. Hillsborough County, FL.This was a corridor study for West Busch Boulevard (SR 580) from North Dale Mabry Highway to North Nebraska Avenue in Hillsborough County. The outcome of the study will be a Corridor Alternatives and Strategies Report outlining the vision for short-term and long-term improvements within the corridor to meet the mobility and connectivity needs of all users, regardless of their transportation mode of choice. Ken reviewed all documents for conformance with the project Quality Management Plan. Quality Manager. SR 580/West Busch Boulevard Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation (RRR), FDOT District 7. Tampa, FL.Jacobs is providing RRR design services for 1.3 miles of SR West Busch Boulevard (SR 580) from east of Armenia Avenue to west of Florida Avenue. Ken serves as Quality Manager and reviews all documents for conformance with the project Quality Management Plan. QC Reviewer. Beachline East (SR 528) Expressway PD&E Study, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise. Orange and Brevard Counties, FL.This PD&E Study evaluated the proposed Beachline widening to eight lanes from SR 520 to SR 524 (Industry Road). The PD&E Study includes overlapping design (milling and resurfacing) for critical roadway segments, feasibility evaluation of a potential service plaza, multimodal accommodations for rail and transit facilities, and extensive environmental resources within the study area. As QC Reviewer, Ken was responsible for reviewing the engineering documents and concept plans. Page 1332 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C:RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 10 Continued: Ken Wooten, PE Technical Resource/Roadway/MOT. Wekiva Parkway Corridor Consultant, Central Florida Expressway Authority (CFX) and FDOT District 5. Orange, Lake, and Seminole Counties, FL.This was a design project for a new 25-mile section of the Wekiva Parkway for CFX and FDOT. Jacobs managed six design teams in the delivery of five roadway and three toll facility projects with a constructed value of $550M and provided comprehensive reviews of all necessary design submittals for CFX. Jacobs provided contractual support services for negotiations and contract administration, ensuring all contracts were audit compliant for CFX, and helped CFX with the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan application process through the Federal Highway Administration through final loan approval. We coordinated with the public involvement consultant and the CFX public involvement officer. Jacobs also provided technical reviews and environmental compliance for the design of the FDOT’s nine design sections required as part of the Wekiva Parkway corridor. Ken provided technical reviews on roadway and MOT plans. Project Manager. US 41/SR 45/Broad Street Improvements, FDOT District 7. Hernando County, FL.This project involved the milling and resurfacing of the asphalt pavement and correcting cross slope to meet current design criteria for 4.76 miles of roadway. The existing typical section is a two-lane rural section with deficient cross slope and vertical curves. Project also includes correcting super-elevation rate and super-elevation transitions, developing two separate pavement designs to account for varying cracking and rutting depths, replacing existing cracked concrete ditch pavement, designing signing and pavement marking upgrades to improve the safety at the intersection of US 41 and CR 481/Snow Memorial Highway, and processing design variations for deficient design features. Project Manager. Harney Road and Williams Road Intersection Improvements Design, Miscellaneous Professional Engineering Services General/Civil Contract. Hillsborough County, FL.Ken managed a wide range of engineering services for this intersection safety improvements design project. The primary improvements included new traffic signals with the incorporation of pedestrian facilities and bicycle lanes within the project limits. Ken managed the project involved design for the relocation of two Hillsborough County force mains and coordination with multiple private utilities. Project Manager. Himes Avenue and Kirby Street Intersection Improvements Design, Miscellaneous Professional Engineering Services General/Civil Contract. Hillsborough County, FL.This project included milling and resurfacing of existing pavement, widening for the turn lane, adding paved shoulders, adding sidewalks, drainage improvements, permitting, utility coordination, and surveying and mapping. Ken managed this design project, which added a southbound left turn lane on a two-lane rural facility. Page 1333 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C:RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 11 Velvet Bridges,PE, MSCE QA/QC – STRUCTURES (JACOBS) EDUCATION/ QUALIFICATIONS MS, Civil Engineering, University of South Florida BS, Civil Engineering, University of South Florida REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer: FL (#52061); AZ (#33653); OH (#73384); CA (#77494); MN (#48751); GA (#46992); PR (#28464); TN (#126487) Structural Engineer: UT (3083617-2202) YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 35 Velvet has 35 years of experience providing concrete bridge design, ship impact, structural modeling, and quality control. Her experience includes preparing preliminary and final design of major concrete bridge structures, including grade separations and water crossing, post-tensioned segmental concrete, and long-span cable-stayed types. Velvet has substantial experience providing services in projects’ construction phases, including inspection, load rating, and rehabilitation of new and existing bridges. Selected Projects EOR. I-4 Ultimate Improvement Project, FDOT District 5 (Design Builder SGL Constructors Design Build Joint Venture). Orange County, FL.Velvet prepared design of a curved arch steel cable pedestrian bridge over I-4 at Maitland Boulevard. I-4 is often called the backbone of Florida transportation system. The bridge is situated over ten lanes of I-4 as well as seven lanes of off/on ramps. The simple span bridge is 600 feet long with a 12- foot- wide deck curved in-plan. The steel arch rib is 708 feet long. This design-built project is based on LRFD. EOR. Miami Intermodal Center-Earlington Heights Guideway Structures (MIC-EHT), Miami Dade Transit. Dade County, FL.Velvet served as EOR for the final design of 13 segmental box girder bridges by balanced cantilever method of construction. The MIC-EHT connector consists of a 2.4-mile extension to the elevated, heavy-rail Metrorail line from Earlington Heights Station at NW 22nd Avenue and NW 41st Street to the Miami Intermodal Center near Miami International Airport. This $230M extension has numerous challenges involving long-span segmental concrete box girder design over the Miami River, an active tri-rail freight corridor, and a major expressway (SR112). The project included a four-level station integrated with a bus terminal plaza and a pedestrian overpass which connects the station to the airport’s rental car facility and automated people mover station. The design-bid project was based on LRFD. EOR. SR408/SR417 Ultimate Interchange Improvements (Project 253F), Orlando- Orange County Expressway Authority. Orange County, FL.Velvet served as EOR for the final design of three curved precast spliced U-Beam Flyover Ramps (maximum span of 200’-0”). This type of structure has been successfully used in other states but is new to Florida. The method of construction consists of temporary supports at the splice sections using post-tensioning. The design-bid project was based on LRFD. Lead Design Engineer. SR 826/SR 836 (Palmetto Expressway/Dolphin Expressway) Interchange, FDOT District 6. Miami-Dade County, FL.The SR 826/SR 836 Interchange is the second largest highway project in Florida. It is a four-level interchange in the heart of Miami-Dade County adjacent to the Miami International Airport. The project includes reconstruction of two miles of SR 826 and three miles of SR 836 to provide five lanes in each direction. The project also includes the introduction of roads along SR 836 and construction of 51 bridges, including eight segmental bridges. Velvet prepared final design of three precast segmental box girder highway bridges (maximum span of 240 feet). The design assumed a balanced cantilever method of erection. This design-bid project was based on LRFD. Design Engineer. Thomas B. Manuel Bridge, FDOT Turnpike Authority. Martin County, FL.Velvet designed the superstructure of a multi-span precast/prestressed Florida Bulb-T 78 Beam northbound bridge addition over the St. Lucie Canal. This design-build project was based on LRFD. Design Engineer. SR 55 (US 19) over Countryside Blvd. and SR 55 (US 19) over SR 580, FDOT District 7. Pinellas County, FL.Velvet was responsible for the independent design of the cast-in-place multi cell box girders. She performed the load rating analysis of both bridges using FDOT’s established procedure. Page 1334 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C:RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 12 Continued: Velvet Bridges, PE Design Engineer. Acosta Main River Bridge, FDOT District 2. Duval County, FL.Velvet performed the calculations necessary for a required crane permit for the Jacksonville Express Skyway system. She determined the maximum allowable crane loads in the bridge by performing a longitudinal and transverse analysis of a five-span cast-in-place concrete box girder erected in balanced cantilever with a 630-foot main span and cast- in-place concrete box girder approaches erected on falsework. This entailed structural loading to carry light rail transit. Design Engineer. Old Sunshine Skyway Bridge over Tampa Bay, FDOT District 7. Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties, FL.Velvet prepared design to upgrade the northbound and southbound approach spans of the existing bridge concrete deck for recreational fishing piers. Independent Technical Peer Review. Interchange Plan Review, Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority. Orange County, FL.Velvet conducted the independent technical peer review of a co-consultant’s design (Parsons & BS) of curved precast spliced U-beam flyover ramps for the SR 417 Boggy Creek Road Interchange. The design-build project was based on LRFD. Construction Shop Drawings Reviewer. Miami Intermodal Center-Earlington Heights Guideway Structures, Miami Dade Transit. Dade County, FL.Velvet provided construction support, including reviewing shop drawing and assisting the contractor during construction of the pre-cast segmental box girder segments by balanced cantilever method. This design-bid project was based on LRFD. Independent Technical Peer Reviewer. SR 826/SR 836 (Palmetto Expressway/Dolphin Expressway) Interchange, FDOT District 6. Dade County, FL. Velvet provided construction support through shop drawing reviews and independent peer review of the pre-cast segmental box girder box girder segments by balanced cantilever method of construction. This design- build project was based on LRFD. Independent Technical Peer Reviewer. Major Structures Plan Review, FDOT Districts 2 and D4. St. Johns, Broward and Volusia Counties, FL.Velvet was responsible for the independent design review of segmental alternates for the Hallandale Beach Blvd; Broward County and Broadway Bridge; Volusia County, Florida. The method of construction consisted of span-by- span erection. Under the same contract an independent design review was performed for the SR-312 Bridge over Matanzas River; St. Johns County, Florida. Independent Technical Peer Reviewer. Major Structures Plan Review, FDOT Districts 4, 5 and 6. Martin, Volusia and Dade County, FL.Velvet was responsible for the independent design review of segmental alternates for the Mac Arthur Causeway Bridge; Dade County, Roosevelt Boulevard Bridge Replacement, Martin County and Seabreeze Bridge; Volusia County, Florida. The method of construction consisted of balanced cantilever erection over intercoastal waterway. Under the same contract an independent ship impact study was performed for the Merrill Barber Bridge. Bridge Inspection. Evaluation of Existing Bridges, FDOT Districts 4 and 5. Broward, Palm Beach and Osceola Counties, FL.Velvet was responsible for the production Bridge Rating Reports for concrete bridges after performing bridge inspection evaluations. Bridge Research. Epoxy Coated Rebar Study, Key West Bridges. FDOT District 6. Monroe County, FL.Velvet was responsible for the evaluation of Corrosion of Epoxy Coated Reinforcing Steel in Concrete Key West Bridges. Page 1335 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C:RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 13 Danh Lee,PE QA/QC - DRAINAGE/PERMITTING (JACOBS) EDUCATION/ QUALIFICATIONS BSCE, Civil Engineering, University of Central Florida REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer: Florida (License No. 68228) FDOT, LRE Certified FDOT, CES Certified YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 22 Danh has over 20 years of experience preparing transportation and drainage design and developing plans for major and minor roadways, expressways, and interstate highways, including major multi-level interchanges. His project experience includes planning, preliminary design, and final design, including stormwater management and environmental permitting education. His permitting experience includes procuring surface water and environmental permits from St. Johns River Water Management District, SFWMD, Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), FDEP, USACE, and EPA. Danh brings in-depth knowledge of drainage needs and considerations along the project corridor from his experience serving as the Drainage QC Lead for the Pond Siting Report portion of the Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study. Selected Projects Drainage QC Lead. Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study, Collier County. Collier County, FL.Jacobs conducted a study to evaluate potential roadway corridor improvements to widen Wilson Boulevard from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road in northern Collier County. Specifically, the study evaluated widening Wilson Boulevard from a two-lane undivided facility to a four-lane divided roadway with curb and gutter. This study included the development of alternatives, a comparative evaluation of the social and environmental effects, and the overall cost of each option. The project also included the addition of sidewalks, a shared-use path, and bike lanes and bus stop enhancements. Danh served as Drainage QC Lead for the Pond Siting Report. Drainage Engineer. I-4/SR 408 Interim Interchange, Central Florida Expressway Authority. Orange County, FL.Danh designed the storm sewer pipe network system and prepared the Storm Water Pollution Prevention plan. The interchange improvements will widen I-4 and SR 408 from six to eight lanes and redesign the existing facility to a four-level interchange. This project represents a joint undertaking between the Orlando-Orange CFX and FDOT District 5. Drainage Engineer. I-75 Widening, FDOT District 5. Sumter County, FL.This project involved preparing final design and construction documents for widening I-75 from south of CR 470 to south of Florida’s Turnpike. The project scope was limited to developing 60% plans and supporting documents to a stage far enough to identify ROW requirements, prepare final ROW maps, and obtain environmental permits. This project also includes analysis of a single-point interchange at CR 470. Senior Drainage Engineer. SR 40 Improvements, FDOT District 5. Marion County, FL.This project included improvements to SR 40 at three locations. Location A was the I-75 Interchange, Location B was the SW 27th Avenue Intersection, and Location C was NW 52nd Avenue to East of I-75. Location A involves widening SR 40 to provide for two left-turn lanes onto the northbound and southbound I-75 on-ramps, including widening these ramps. Location B involves improvements to the intersection to provide dual left-turn lanes in all directions. Location C involves milling and resurfacing SR 40 and adding sidewalk and dedicated bike lanes on both sides. The scope of services for all three locations also involves signing and pavement marking, signalization, environmental permitting, geotechnical investigation, and design survey. Locations A and B also involved lighting and ROW mapping. Drainage Engineer. General Consultant, FDOT District 5. FL.Danh conducted a drainage plan review during this contract to assist FDOT with the final design review to implement the design/build/maintain contract for the 61-mile commuter rail transit project, SunRail project, which will run from DeLand to Poinciana in Central Florida. Danh reviewed final drainage design plans for the track corridor and all stations including all site civil design reviews for 12 commuter rail stations, including 6 with park-and-ride and similar facilities. Page 1336 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C:RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 14 Continued: Danh Lee, PE Lead Drainage Engineer. SR 50 from Sumter/Lake County Line to CR 33, FDOT District 5. Lake County, FL.As Lead Drainage Engineer, Danh prepared drainage design for both primary and secondary systems and permitting for the SR 50 widening project. This project consisted of reconstruction of 4 miles of a two-lane major arterial roadway to a four-lane divided roadway. About half the project length is rural with a 65 mph design speed and the other half is urban with a 45 mph design speed. The project includes a roundabout at Tuscanooga Road, relocation of the CR 33 intersection, a shared use path, and an emergency access only signalized intersection. Lead Drainage Engineer. SR 408 and SR 417 Ultimate Interchange Improvements, Central Florida Expressway Authority. Orange County, FL.As Lead Drainage Engineer, Danh prepared drainage design of both primary and secondary systems for the SR 408 and SR 417 Interchange. The project included interchange movements to and from SR 417 south of the interchange and improvements to SR 417 extending south over Econlockhatchee Trail and Lake Underhill Road. The interchange includes five new ramp structures, two of which are high-level multiple-span curved structures using prestressed concrete U beams—one of the first of this beam type used in Florida. Senior Drainage Engineer. SR 528 Widening, FDOT District 5. Brevard County, FL.This project included development of final design and preparation of construction documents, permits, and specifications for the five-mile SR 528 widening from east of SR 3 to Port Canaveral Interchange. As Senior Drainage Engineer, Danh prepared drainage design and specifications. This project will add one express lane in each direction separated by a four- foot buffer from the general use lanes and a 12-foot multi-use trail along the north side of SR 528. This project involves three interchanges at Banana River Drive, SR 401, and George King Boulevard and replacement of five twin bridges at Sykes Creek, Banana River Drive, Banana River Relief, Banana River, and SR 401. Drainage Engineer. SR 429 Wekiva Parkway Section 7A, FDOT District 5. Seminole, FL. Danh developed stormwater pond design, cross drain design, ditch design, and special gutter profiles to complete SR 429 Wekiva Parkway corridor and interchange. The design for this project includes design and preparation of final construction plans and permits for approximately 3.5 miles of an Urban Expressway (SR 429 Wekiva Parkway) with adjacent frontage roads, from east of River Oaks Circle to Orange Blvd (CR 431) in Seminole County. This project involves five roundabouts and seven bridges. Lead Drainage Engineer. Viera Interchange PD&E Study, FDOT District 5. Brevard County, FL.This was a PD&E study for Viera Boulevard, a two- and four-lane arterial from Power Line Road to US 1, including a four-lane overpass of I-95. Brevard County built the overpass in 2007 as the first phase of a new interchange with I-95. As part of the Viera DRI, FDOT recognized the potential for increased traffic congestion at the Fiske Boulevard interchange to the north and the Wickham Road interchange to the south, as well as on Fiske Boulevard. This led to a proportionate share agreement with FDOT in which The Viera Company (TVC) is committed to funding the PD&E Study, final design, and permitting and construction phases of the project. As a funding partner and primary landowner, TVC is a major project stakeholder, requiring an additional level of coordination. Services provided on this contract include preliminary engineering, constructability and MOT, cost estimates, traffic operations, interchange concepts, structural, drainage, floodplains, geotechnical, threatened and endangered species, wetlands, and public involvement. Drainage Designer. I-4 Ultimate Design, Section 4, FDOT District 5. Orange County, FL. Danh designed the storm sewer pipe network system for the final design of I-4 from south of Orange Blossom Trail to south of Ivanhoe Boulevard. This reconstruction project improves four miles of I-4 to six general use lanes and four HOV express lanes. The project also includes roadway improvements along two miles of SR 408. The project has major interchanges along I-4 at OBT, Kaley and Michigan, SR 408, and SR 50. SR 408 and I-4 is a complex four-level interchange with extensive ramp reconstruction. Senior Drainage Engineer. SR 869/Sawgrass Expressway (from N of Atlantic Blvd. to SR 7) Widening from 6 to 10 lanes, Reconstruct/Rehabilitate interchanges at Sample Rd., Coral Ridge Dr. & University Dr., FTE. Broward County, FL.This project includes roadway widening, modification of the stormwater management systems, signing, structures, ITS, and lighting. Danh is responsible for both primary and secondary drainage design, including Sample Road and University Drive. Page 1337 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C:RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 15 Mohamad-Waleed Gebarin,PE ROADWAY DESIGN ( JACOBS ) EDUCATION/ QUALIFICATIONS BS, Civil Engineering, University of South Florida REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer: Florida (License No. 88994) YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 9 Mohamad is a transportation design professional engineer with 9 years of roadway design, TTCP, plans production, and project management experience. He is highly motivated and detail-oriented with project experience in design-build, conventional RRR, widening, intersection improvements, sidewalk/trail improvements, and complete street safety projects. He is well versed in design and production utilizing MicroStation OpenRoads Designer and an expert in 3D corridor modeling. He thrives in a collaborative team setting and finds joy in producing high-quality deliverables for clients. He prides himself in his ability to communicate and mentor staff. Selected Projects Deputy Project Manager, SR 60 Resurfacing/Rigid Pavement Reconstruction, FDOT District 7, Hillsborough County, FL.This 1- mile RRR project involves the replacement of existing asphalt pavement with rigid pavement, safety analysis, and upgrades, bringing ADA features into conformance, and improving access management via turn lane reconstruction. TTC was essential to this project’s success due to rigid pavement reconstruction constraints and drop-off conditions with high speed and high traffic volumes. Roadway Engineer of Record, Green Key Neighborhood Drainage Improvements, Pasco County, FL.The Green Key Neighborhood is an 11-acre area with substantial drainage issues due to their low lyinig elevations and proximity to Oyster Creek. Tidal and Sunny-day flooding are normal conditions for the residents of the neighborhood. Improvements will upsize the existing drainage system with a potential for seawalls if property acquisition can be made. Roadway and drainage improvements work together to remove low points, enhance stormwater runoff slopes, and alleviate drainage issues. Full depth reclamation (FDR) is the preferred method of pavement restoration. Responsibilities include roadway design, plans production, internal and external coordination. Lead Roadway Engineer, Orient Road at Sligh Avenue Intersection Improvements, Hillsborough County, FL.This project involved preparing final design and construction documents for widening I-75 from south of CR 470 to south of Florida’s Turnpike. The project scope was limited to developing 60% plans and supporting documents to a stage far enough to identify ROW requirements, prepare final ROW maps, and obtain environmental permits. This project also includes analysis of a single-point interchange at CR 470. Deputy Project Manager E Columbus Drive / N 46th Street Complete Street Improvements, District 7 LAP, City of Tampa, FL.Both projects were part of the City’s Walk-Bike program to enhance accessibility and safety for vulnerable users within the project limits. The projects included reconstruction, widened sidewalks, RRFBs, intersection bulb-outs, a mini-roundabout, corridor lighting, and landscaping. After construction, Columbus Dr was announced as the “model project” for complete street projects in the City of Tampa. Roundabout Designer, Doyle Carlton Drive and Laurel Street Roundabout Design, District 7 LAP, City of Tampa, FL.This project converted a high-accident 4-way stop intersection in the downtown area into the City’s first single-lane roundabout with a dedicated circulating bicycle track. Proposed improvements include 10-ft wide sidewalks, buffered bike lanes over the Laurel Street bridge, and raised pedestrian crosswalks. This project is in line with the City’s Vision Zero initiative by significantly reducing serious and fatal accidents, increasing traffic operation levels, and providing safe access to all roadway users. Lead Roadway Engineer, Miscellaneous Services – Bridge Feasibility Studies, Hillsborough County, FL.This miscellaneous structural engineering and inspection services contract included feasibility studies for bridge rehabilitation and bridge replacement. Each study incorporated three alternatives with a preferred alternative encompassing all major anticipated design challenges including roadway horizontal/vertical geometry, TTCP, and roadside safety assessments and recommendations. The assessments provided allowed for the prioritization of bridge replacements county-wide. Page 1338 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C:RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 16 Continued:Mohamad-Waleed Gebarin, PE Lead Roadway Engineer, Miscellaneous Services – Sun City Center Assessment, Hillsborough County, FL.This miscellaneous services contract included an assessment of Sun City Center (SCC) in Hillsborough County. This 50-linear mile project included roadway and sidewalk ADA assessment for the SCC community with an aggressive 2- month schedule. Mohamad led the assessment and production of nearly 500 plan sheets and delivered the project on time and budget, allowing for an accurate probable cost of construction for Hillsborough County and the SCC community. Lead Engineer / Deputy Project Manager, DeCubellis Road Widening from Little Road to Town Center Drive, Pasco County, Pasco County, FL.This 4-mile widening project widens existing two-lane undivided roadways into four-lane divided roadways with improvements along 3 miles of DeCubellis Road and 1 mile along Starkey Boulevard. Additional items include intersection improvements, lighting, signing and pavement markings, and signalization improvements. An intersection control evaluation (ICE) was conducted at the intersection of DeCubellis Road and Starkey Boulevard. This led to the design of a partial displaced left turn (DLT) intersection that significantly increases traffic operations. As a lead roadway designer and deputy project manager, Gebarin has taken care of plans production, and internal and external coordination. Lead Engineer / Deputy Project Manager, Tampa Palms Boulevard from Ebensburg Drive to Bruce B. Downs Boulevard Complete Streets Project, District 7 LAP, City of Tampa, FL.This complete street project intends to create a basis for a design report for this 4-mile-long corridor. Project improvements included traffic study analysis, lane repurposing, pavement reclamation, buffered bicycle lanes, enhanced crossings, school queue lanes adjacent to both elementary schools, and roundabout analysis. Conceptual plans include roadway, drainage, lighting, signing and pavement, and signalization design. As a lead roadway designer and deputy project manager, Gebarin has taken care of plans production, and internal and external coordination. Lead Engineer / Deputy Project Manager, Buckingham Road and Gunnery Road Roundabout, Lee County, District 1 LAP, Lee County, FL.The project involves designing improvements for Gunnery Road at the Buckingham Road intersection in Lee County. Both Gunnery Road and Buckingham Road are two-lane undivided arterial roadways. Improvements include reconstruction of the sharply skewed intersection to a two-lane roundabout with pedestrian facilities, lighting, landscaping, and drainage/ stormwater treatment facilities for permitting through SFWMD. As a lead roadway designer and deputy project manager, Gebarin has taken care of plans production, and internal and external coordination. Lead Engineer / Deputy Project Manager, East Columbus Drive from North Nebraska Avenue (SR 45) to 14th Street, City of Tampa, District 7 LAP, City of Tampa, FL. This 0.5-mile project includes developing conceptual plans and a final design to alleviate unsafe conditions while enhancing aesthetics and improving safety for bicyclists and pedestrians. Work is part of the City of Tampa’s Center City Plan that proposes roadway “right-sizing” and traffic rebalancing. Services include roadway realignment, intersection improvements, and variable depth milling and resurfacing. Additional improvements include traffic studies, widened sidewalks and buffered bicycle lanes, public involvement, permitting, and utility coordination. As a lead roadway designer and deputy project manager, Gebarin has taken care of plans production, and internal and external coordination. Lead Engineer / Deputy Project Manager, 46th Street from SR 580 (Busch Boulevard) to SR 582 (Fowler Avenue), District 7 LAP, City of Tampa, FL.This 1.5-mile project includes pavement design, milling and resurfacing, drainage improvements consisting of additional inlets, gutter profiling, sidewalk widening from 5 feet to 10 feet, signing and marking, and maintenance of traffic. Project provides sidewalk connectivity, sidewalk widening includes multiple mid-block crossings and share-the-road pavement markings, and intersection and travel lane improvements. A key project feature is a mini roundabout at the intersection of 46th Street and Linebaugh Avenue, which has a high record of accidents. Page 1339 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C:RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 17 Brett Rakita, PE STRUCTURAL DESIGN ( JACOBS ) EDUCATION/ QUALIFICATIONS MCE, Civil Engineering, University of South Florida, 2001 BS, Civil Engineering, University of South Florida, REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer: Florida (License No. 59474), Georgia (License No. 44063) YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 25 Brett has 25 years of work experience in the field of structures design with 23 years focusing on transportation structures, including performing structural analysis and design for steel and concrete bridges and buildings. He also has experience with shop drawing review, bridge inspection, and load rating for various bridge types. He has a broad experience of major design-build projects and post design services. Selected Projects Structural Lead/Engineer of Record, I-4 Ultimate Design-Build PPP, FDOT District 5, Orange/Seminole County, FL.Major Design-Build project (PPP) consisting of 21 miles of reconstruction extending from Kirkman Rd. to SR 434. Involves the widening of I-4 to the ultimate lane configuration of 8 general use lanes and 4 managed lanes as well as interchange improvements and replacement of overpass bridges throughout the corridor. Responsibilities include structural lead for twenty-four bridges in the Ivanhoe Area (From New Hampshire Street to Kennedy Boulevard) through very narrow right-of-way and complex design phasing. Bridges include a major curved steel plate girder 270-foot single span multi- road crossing as well as Engineer-of-Record for several bridges and miscellaneous structural components. Structural Lead/Engineering of Record, I-16 Widening and I-16/I-95 Interchange Improvements Design-Build, I-95, GDOT, Chatham County, GA. This major design- build project consists of replacing the current interchange with a partial turbine configuration to improve safety and widen I-16 to improve capacity 7 miles east to I-516. Responsibilities include design and lead of drawing production of two multi-span curved prestressed concrete beam ramp bridges along a tight radius, the 200-ft wide I-95 bridge over I-16 consisting of mainline traffic and collector-delivery access under phased construction to remove the existing interchange bridge and production of permanent wall plans. In addition, coordination with the contractor and client at a continuous basis Design Engineer, I-275 Segment 2A Bridges, FDOT District 7, Tampa, FL.This project involved widening a section of a major interstate highway through the City of Tampa. An understanding of the impacts of the proposed bridges on the existing land was required. Additionally, full design of the miscellaneous structures was required for both cantilever and span monotube signs. Responsibilities included design of miscellaneous structures and post-design services. Design Engineer, SR 44 Signalization, FDOT District 7, Citrus County, FL.This project required the design of mast arms at an intersection for a fire rescue facility. Responsibilities include design of structures and post-design services coordination. Design Engineer, Pinellas County ATMS Final Design, FDOT District 7, Clearwater, FL.This project included the use of cameras and an electronic message panel. The cameras were placed on high mast poles and mast arms, which required analysis. The message panel required design of a cantilevered sign. Responsibilities include design of structures and post- design services coordination. Engineer-of-Record, SR 559 over SR 400 (I-4) Design-Build (DB), FDOT District 1, Polk County, FL. Served as Engineer-of-Record for overpass, retaining walls, and CCTV pole foundation. The bridge over I-4 is 110 feet wide with dual directional vehicular and pedestrian traffic separated by a raised median and flared at the north end to accommodate site distance for traffic. The three-span arrangement of the bridge is to provide for an Ultimate I-4 multi-modal corridor containing a widening as well as future high-speed rail. To meet rail clearance, a removable fascia is in place at the center span for future use. A unique intrusion prevention wall with caged fencing aligns the sides of the bridge for safety and to prevent debris from falling on the I-4 multi-modal corridor. The bridge utilizes Florida-I Beams over each of the three spans with the maximum spans of 155 feet over the vehicular lanes of the multi-modal I-4 corridor and a shorter 67-foot span over the future high-speed rail. Design responsibilities included structural design of superstructure and substructure elements using Leap Software among various other programs including ones provided by FDOT and other created in Mathcad as well as generation of load rating documentation for the bridge. His other responsibilities included coordination with the contractor, other departments, and subconsultants as well as package together submittals and QC documentation. Page 1340 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C:RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 18 Continued: Brett Rakita, PE Design Engineer, SR 55/US 19 over Enterprise Road, FDOT District 7, Pinellas County, FL.Project involved the design and load rating of a horizontally curved box girder superstructure and other bridge components. Responsibilities included technical calculations for superstructure steel beam design, design of miscellaneous structures, and CADD of drawings. Structural Reviewer, I-4 and Lee Roy Selmon Crosstown Connector Interchange, FDOT District 7, Hillsborough County, FL.The interchange bridges for the concrete alternative include several high-level truck ramps. Span-by-span and balanced cantilever segmental construction methods are being utilized on this project. Responsibilities included quality control review of various geometry layouts for this complex interchange system. Design Engineer, SR 50 (Colonial Drive) over SR 436 (Semoran Boulevard), FDOT District 5, Orange County, FL.This single point urban interchange (SPUI) crossing is a 117-foot-wide bridge with three lanes in each direction and an overall length of 516 feet. The proposed pier shape and location impacted the span arrangement. Other difficult issues encountered in the bridge design were constructability, fabrication, and erection. Elements of note in this bridge are post-tensioned pier caps, steel box-girder bridges, and dapped end/ledge connections. Responsibilities included full bridge design and load rating. His post-design responsibilities included coordination with the contractor and CEI, on-site inspections during construction, shop drawing review, and addressing RFI’s and RFM’s.. Design Engineer, SR 694 (Gandy Boulevard Bridges) from West of 9th Street to East of 4th Street, FDOT District 7, Pinellas County, FL.This project consists of four pairs of bridges. The bridges over 4th Street crosses a single point urban interchange (SPUI) and consists of a three-span continuous steel plate girder with a main span of 280 feet and prestressed concrete Florida-I beams at approach spans over Roosevelt Boulevard. The bridges over 9th Street (Martin Luther King Jr. Street) are considered a diamond interchange and consists of a three-span continuous steel plate girder crossing with simple-span approach spans over retention ponds. The 9th Street bridge's main span is 317 feet long with skewed, intermediate piers. The two remaining pairs of bridges are over 16th Street and a Frontage Road connector. Each of these contains a bridge skew and consists of Florida-I beams. Responsibilities included structural design and load rating of superstructure and design of substructure elements using Leap Software and MDX Analysis. Design Engineer, SR 93 (I-75) from North of SR 80 to South of SR 78, FDOT District 1, Lee County, FL.This project involved widening of eight bridges from four to eight lanes along I-75 including a 62-span bridge over the Caloosahatchee River that contains a three-span continuous steel structure over the channel crossing. Responsibilities included design and review of bridge calculations and load ratings of existing bridges and completed widening. Page 1341 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C:RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 19 Darren Dyer,PE DRAINAGE (JACOBS) EDUCATION/ QUALIFICATIONS BS, Civil Engineering, Florida International University BS, Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer: FL (License No. 73951) YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 14 Darren is responsible for drainage design, environmental permitting, and plans production for transportation, infrastructure, aviation, and environmental projects. He has 14 years of experience in various drainage, infrastructure, aviation, defense, and site development projects. He has assisted in the production of technical proposals; contract documents; and plans, specifications, cost estimates, and engineering reports for various projects. Darren has also obtained construction and closeout permits for projects in Miami-Dade and Broward Counties from a variety of state and local agencies, as well as participated in construction administration activities, including site inspections, coordinating field changes, and construction closeout.. Selected Projects Drainage Project Engineer. FDOT District 4, Districtwide Drainage Studies and Environmental Permitting, FL. Darren was responsible for drainage engineering and analysis and permitting task work order contract that involves all aspects of drainage analysis, design, and permitting for projects throughout the District. The project had 28 active or completed Task Work Orders, including the SR A1A Manalapan Drainage Improvements, US-1 at Tanglewood Village, SR 808/Glades Road Drainage Study, I-95 Rest Areas Drainage Study, Broward County Mitigation Project, I-95 Rest Areas Push-Button Plans, SR A1A Flap Gates, I-95/ I-595 Pond Armoring Push-Button Plans, CSX Railroad Ditch Drainage Improvements, and SR A1A Lantana Drainage Improvements. Darren was responsible for the production of complete plans, specifications, estimates, and all permits/certifications. Drainage Project Engineer. FDOT District 4, Districtwide Drainage Studies and Environmental Permitting, FL.Darren was responsible for drainage engineering and analysis for Drainage and permitting task work order contract that involves all aspects of drainage analysis, design, and permitting for projects throughout the District. Task Work Orders include Davie Boulevard at SW 25th Ave Drainage Improvements. Darren was responsible for the production of complete plans, specifications, estimates, and all permits/certifications. Lead Drainage Engineer. FDOT District 4, I-75 Alligator Alley Environmental Project, FL.Darren was responsible for drainage engineering design and permitting services for the improvement of the existing I-75 Alligator Alley rest area in Broward County. The project scope included constructing educational amenities within the existing site, including a wetland exhibit. Lead Drainage Engineer. DOT District 4, RRR along SR-25 /US-27 from Hendry/Palm Beach County Line to SR-80, FL.Darren was responsible for drainage engineering and analysis for a Resurfacing, Restoration and Rehabilitation (RRR) and safety improvements project on rural US 27 for a total of 12.59 miles. Lead Drainage Engineer. FDOT District 4, SR 710/Beeline Highway Widening, FL.Darren was responsible for drainage engineering and analysis for a Major Strategic Intermodal System corridor project that involves the reconstruction of an existing two-lane facility to four-lane divided facility with concrete pavement and a new open drainage system with linear dry detention ponds (swales). Responsible for developing all conceptual and final design drainage deliverables, and obtaining all required environmental permit approvals, including a South Florida Water Management District Environmental Resource Permit and United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Dredge and Fill Permit. Senior Drainage Engineer. FDOT District 6, Districtwide Drainage Plans Review and Design, Miami-Dade County, FL.Responsible for drainage design tasks, push-button plans, drainage plans review, and environmental permitting. The scope of services includes review of design plans and reports for compliance with current design standards and criteria, providing drainage design and permitting support, and providing staff for field reviews and plans preparation for resolution of flooding complaints and drainage deficiencies. Page 1342 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C: RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 20 Continued: Darren Dyer, PE Drainage Project Engineer. FDOT District 4, I-95 Express Lanes Phase III Design-Build, FL. Mega-project involving 29 miles of interstate widening and High Occupancy Vehicle to High- Occupancy Toll Lane conversions. Responsible for drainage design and environmental permitting, as well as preparing Conceptual Drainage Report and obtaining South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Individual Environmental Resource Planning (Conceptual), SFWMD Right-of-Way Occupancy Permits, United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Dredge/Fill Permit, USACE Section 408 Approvals, and the United States Coast Guard Bridge Permits. Provided design-build procurement support and served as owner’s representative providing drainage and environmental permitting support during final design and construction by the design-build firm. Owner’s Representative; Drainage Project Engineer. FDOT District 4, I-595 Corridor Design Consultant, FL.Tasked with providing drainage and environmental permitting support during final design and construction by P3 Concessionaire. Darren was responsible for drainage support, evaluation of drainage construction issues, and shop drawing reviews. Drainage Project Engineer. FDOT District 4, I-95 (SR 9) at Gateway Boulevard Design, FL.Design-bid-build project at the SR-9/Interstate 95 Gateway Boulevard Interchange and along Gateway Boulevard in the City of Boynton Beach in Palm Beach County. The purpose of the project is to widen, mill and resurface the existing SR 9/I- 95 at Gateway Boulevard interchange (Exit 59) to enhance operational capacity, reduce congestion, and increase safety. Darren was responsible for the development of a drainage report, plans production, drainage calculations, and AdICPR model, as well as hydraulic grade line calculations and drainage construction plans using GeoPak Drainage. Drainage Project Engineer. FDOT District 4, New Interchange I-95 at Oslo Road, FL.A new interchange at the junction of Oslo Road/County Road 606 and I-95/SR-9 to provide additional capacity to accommodate future traffic needs. The proposed interchange will provide improved incident response time along I-95, improve regional connectivity and travel time for area travelers, provide an additional evacuation route for area residents, complement and facilitate the County’s planned vision for this area, and provide roadway improvements that are compatible with adjacent planning and construction projects. Darren was responsible for environmental permit sketches and wetland impact summaries. Prepared SJRWMD wetland impact sketches and impact summary tables. Drainage Project Engineer. FDOT District 4, I-95 at SR 842/Broward Boulevard Project Development and Environment Study, FL.This study developed three viable alternatives and alignments to increase the level of service of the interchange and adjacent intersections, enhance system linkage and modal interrelationships at I-95 and Broward Boulevard, reduce congestion, and increase safety at the interchange through the 2040 design year horizon. The study was compatible with the 95 Express Lane Improvements Phase 3 and will evaluate comprehensive improvements to the surrounding multimodal facilities. Darren was responsible for drainage analysis for the study for major interchange modifications at Broward Boulevard Boulevard. Page 1343 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C: RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 21 Rick Gorsira PERMITTING/ENVIRONMENTAL ( JACOBS) EDUCATION/ QUALIFICATIONS BS, Zoology, University of Florida REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Wetland Delineator (provisional): US Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Florida YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 41 Rick is experienced in ecological assessments, stormwater, surface water, groundwater, wetland delineation, sediment sampling design, and wildlife assessments. He specializes in monitoring wellfield withdrawal impacts on wetland hydrology and other water supply projects. Rick has extensive experience in aerial photointerpretation, hydroperiod assessments, water supply and reuse water recharge applications, and Environmental Resource Program (ERP) permitting of water supply projects throughout Florida. Rick has successfully delivered several projects for Collier County, including the Pine Ridge Road Improvements project and Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension project. Selected Projects Lead Scientist. Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, Collier County. Collier County, FL.This project involved permitting and design of a new road from Collier Boulevard (CR 951) to 16th Street NE in Collier County, Florida, including expansion of an existing two-lane road. The proposed right-of-way width was 200 feet for a total length of seven miles. Proposed canal improvements included the relocation of Cypress Canal at two locations and two new bridges over Cypress Canal and one bridge over Curry Canal, Corkscrew Canal, and Orange Tree Canal each for the proposed roadway. As Lead Scientist, Rick coordinated the acquisition of wetland mitigation credits from existing wetland banks and panther habitat units to offset impacts to habitats. Task Manager. Pine Ridge Road Improvements, Collier County. Collier County, FL.Rick served as Task Manager on the permitting of Pine Ridge Road (CR 896), an existing four-lane, divided roadway in Collier County. Collier County contracted our team for design services to improve this section of roadway, from Airport Pulling Road to Logan Boulevard, from a four-lane, rural roadway to a six-lane divided urban section. As Task Manager, Rick was responsible for wetland assessments, endangered and threatened species surveys, and permitting for this roadway. He submitted permit applications for the proposed widening including a Management and Storage of Surface Waters (MSSW) stormwater management permit, wetland resource permit, FDOT permit, Collier County well drilling and vegetative removal permit, and SFWMD Big Cypress Basin Board ROW Use Permit. Rick submitted permit applications upon the completion of 65% design drawings. Rick worked closely with the engineering team by reducing impacts to wetlands so no mitigation would be required for the roadway construction. Ecologist. Paradise Run 50-mgd Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Technology Demonstration Project, South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). FL. Jacobs supervised ecological field site reconnaissance to support planning and conceptual design of the Paradise Run ASR Demonstration System, which is proposed as a 10-well, 50-mgd surface water storage facility on the Kissimmee River/C-38 just downstream of S-65E. Information was needed to assess potential ecological impacts on wetlands associated with the proposed constructed wetland system to serve as an initial pretreatment prior to water storage in the upper and middle Floridan aquifer in stacked ASR wells. Rick participated in field surveys to confirm the presence of threatened and endangered wildlife species within the project site footprint. Project Scientist/Quality Control Analyst. Wellfield, City of Fort Myers. Fort Myers, FL.Jacobs conducted a study for the City’s wellfield to assess operational effects of the shallow wells on the surrounding wetland communities and hydrology. This wellfield was augmented with surface water from the Caloosahatchee River, which was pumped to infiltration galleries within the wellfield. The wellfield operation has since been modified to deeper artesian and Floridan aquifer sources to accommodate the growing demand on the water supply. Monitoring demonstrated that augmentation of the wellfield has limited the extent of hydrological impact and has resulted in positive impacts on the forested wetlands within the wellfield. Project Manager. Water Use Permit Monitoring, Bonita Springs Utilities. Bonita Springs, FL.Rick managed the monitoring of a wetland habitat to assess the impact of water withdrawals of two wellfields as part of a Consumptive Use Permit. Rick led biannual assessments of vegetation and hydrologic response to operation of the wells located in the Tamiami aquifer. Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method assessments were performed on a biannual basis to determine effects of wellfield operation during the dry and wet seasons. The team successfully negotiated with the SFWMD to reduce monitoring requirements, resulting in significant cost savings to the client. Page 1344 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C: RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 22 Continued: Rick Gorsira Senior Scientist/Ecologist. Compliance Monitoring Program, Tampa Bay Water Bill Young Regional Water Supply Reservoir. Hillsborough County, FL.Rick served as a senior scientist and ecologist supporting a semiannual habitat monitoring program for the construction of the Tampa Bay Regional Reservoir. A total of 12 transects were established within floodplain wetlands of adjacent creeks to assess baseline conditions. Based on the current monitoring data, operational effects from the reservoir were determined during system operation. The monitoring stations were established with the goal of assessing the potential hydrological effects on the nearby vegetation communities and downstream habitats. Project Scientist. Freedom Park Stormwater Storage, City of Naples. Collier County, FL. Rick served as Project Scientist for the offline stormwater storage for the Freedom Park in Collier County. He conducted wetland delineation of freshwater forested wetland and listed species survey and prepared an onsite wetland mitigation design and plan. He submitted an ERP application and coordinated with SFWMD, USACE, and FWC for ERP review. The ERP application included the park development including educational facility, wetland enhancement, and treatment wetlands. He conducted gopher tortoise surveys and coordinated with FWC for an incidental take permit for 16 gopher tortoise burrows. Project Manager. Stormwater Canal Sediment Removal, Pinellas County. Pinellas County, FL.Rick managed permitting services for the removal of accumulated sediment in the stormwater outfall canals at 16 locations within the County. He managed ecological studies of the stormwater canals to assess impacts to wetlands, listed species, and water quality, especially receiving waters to assess impacts from proposed sediment removal. Under his leadership, the team developed innovative strategies for permitting which resulted in channel geometry improvements and slope stabilization to reduce sediment load and reduce future maintenance within these stormwater canals in Pinellas County. Lead Scientist. Northwest Five Watershed Management Plan Update, Hillsborough County. Hillsborough County, FL.Rick worked with the team to conduct field investigations for devising best management practices (BMPs) for Northwest Five Watersheds, which included Rocky Brushy, Sweetwater/Lower Sweetwater, Double Branch, and Brooker Creek. Conducted assessments post-summer floods to respond to citizen concerns and investigate potential impediments to stormwater conveyance. As a result of these investigations, Hillsborough County requested development of a comprehensive sediment management plan. Lead Scientist. Crews Lake Natural Systems Restoration, Pasco County. Pasco County, FL.The team prepared a plan of study for the Crews Lake Natural Systems Restoration project, which will use hydrologically-altered wetlands in Crews Lake to receive Pasco County reclaimed water for storage of wet-weather flow, as allowed under the Wetlands Application Rule, Ch. 62 611, FAC. Baseline monitoring requirements will involve water and sediment quality, biological community composition, and hydrologic characterization for one year as required in the rule. Project Manager. McKay Creek Sediment Analysis and Nutrient Reduction Credit, Pinellas County, FL.Rick managed a sediment assessment within McKay Creek to evaluate the potential to receive reduction credits towards the total maximum daily load (TMDL) based on the sediment nitrogen load to the estuarine segment of the creek and characterized sediments to determine disposal options and provide information to contractors for sediment removal with equipment. Project Manager. Kissimmee Lakes Littoral Zone, SFWMD. Osceola County, FL.Rick managed a littoral zone study of the four Kissimmee River headwater lakes (Cypress, Hatchineha, Kissimmee, and Tiger). The study was designed to document littoral zone vegetative community conditions as a baseline for future monitoring of ecological response to the proposed implementation of the Headwaters Revitalization Water Regulation schedule. Species level vegetation cover of the littoral zone and FLUCCS cover of the upland transects were recorded on a PC tablet with a database application. Airboat access and use of innovative field data documentation technologies were an essential element of this project. The team analyzed transect and quadrat replication to make sure the statistical power of the data was adequate to support future monitoring efforts of change in vegetation community characteristics. Project Scientist/Quality Control Analyst. Ave Maria Reclaimed Water System Wetland Storage Project, Collier County. Collier County, FL.The team conducted routine monitoring of the water quality, vegetation, soils, fish, invertebrate, wildlife, and surface and groundwater water levels of hydrologically impacted cypress and marsh wetlands near Immokalee. Rick’s responsibilities included field platform maintenance, well sampling, logistics planning, water quality sampling and quality control review, vegetation and wildlife data collection, office data base input and quality control review, analysis, and report preparation. Page 1345 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C: RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 23 Mike Dickey, PE Utilities ( JOHNSON ENGINEERING ) EDUCATION/ QUALIFICATIONS BS Civil Engineering (1997), University of South Florida REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer: FL (License No. 60057) YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 27 Mike brings extensive experience delivering utility projects and currently serves as Director of Johnson Engineering’s utilities market group. His project experience includes master planning, hydraulic modeling, and designing water distribution systems, wastewater collection systems, irrigation systems, and pumping facilities. Mike’s experience also includes working for a local utility contractor, which gave him a unique perspective of how the utilities he designs today come together in the field. With both utility design and construction experience, Mike has a comprehensive understanding of the entire utility development process from planning through design, permitting, and construction. He knows how to develop a design that works both in theory and in practice. Selected Projects Project Manager. Northeast Service Area Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), IQ and Potable Booster Pump Stations, Collier County. Collier County, FL.Johnson Engineering is a member of a design-build team that is constructing an interim wastewater treatment plant, potable water pumping and storage facilities, irrigation water facilities, and pipeline infrastructure for Collier County. The interim WWTP will have a capacity of 1.5 MGD and will serve Collier County’s Northeast Service Area. Mike managed surveying, site development plans, pipeline design, electrical design, development of a groundwater monitoring plan, and permitting assistance. The project is expected to be completed in 2021 at a cost of approximately $75 million. Project Manager. 91st and 92nd Street Water Main Replacement, Collier County. Collier County, FL.Mike managed design of the replacement of approximately 10,000 linear feet of 12-inch and 8-inch water main in Collier County along 91st and 92nd street located within the Naples Park area. Key design elements included identifying an alignment within congested rights of way that would accomplish project goals while minimizing impacts to the existing residents and allow the existing asbestos cement water main to remain in service during construction. Design also included provisions to remove the entire AC water main once the new system was in service. Mike managed survey, design, permitting, and bidding services. Project Manager. Vanderbilt Cul-de-Sacs Water Main Replacement, Collier County. Collier County, FL.Mike served as Project Manager for the replacement design of approximately 16,000 linear feet of 8-inch and 4-inch water main in Collier County along Vanderbilt Drive and finger streets between Vanderbilt Beach Road and Immokalee Road. Key design elements included identifying an alignment within congested rights of way that would accomplish project goals while minimizing impacts to the existing residents and allow the existing asbestos cement water main to remain in service during construction. Design also included provisions to remove the entire AC water main once the new system was in service. Mike managed the survey, design, permitting and bidding services. Project Manager. Field Data Collection, Collier County. Collier County, FL.Mike is managing ongoing services for Collier County to determine wastewater system pressure and flow conditions. Work includes installing pressure transducers at various locations on the force main system to record pressure and installing low pressure data collectors in lift station wet wells to monitor water levels over an extended period of time. Using known geometry of wet well and supervisory control and data acquisition information provided by Collier County, flow rates can be determined along with corresponding pressures. This is similar to performing multiple pumps downs over an extended period of time and allows for a higher level of confidence in comparison to a single pump down performed one moment in time. This information can be used to determine force main connection head, force main system and lift station deficiencies and potential for infiltration and inflow in the wastewater collection system. Page 1346 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C: RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 24 Continued: Mike Dickey, PE Project Manager. Heritage Bay Master Pump Station, Collier County. Collier County, FL.The County tasks Jacobs with various Developer Responsibility projects throughout the County Mike managed design of a Master Pumps Station capable of conveying a peak flow of approximately 2,700 gpm from the Heritage Bay development and serving as a re-pump for various stations along the CR 951 corridor in Collier County. Project Manager. South Conveyance 30” Water Main, Lee County. Lee County, FL. Mike managed the design and permitting of 13,000 linear feet of pipeline. This project required FDOT permitting to cross I-75. Mike managed preparation of multiple design alternatives including directional drilling before deciding on a jack and bore crossing for I-75. Page 1347 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C: RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 25 Nathan Lunsford, PE PROJECT ENGINEER ( JACOBS ) EDUCATION/ QUALIFICATIONS B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer: FL (License No. 98697) YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 4 Nathan has experience in transportation roadway, bridge design, and site/civil projects, and project management. He has worked on an array of projects including traffic, roadway, transit, planning, bridge relocation, utility relocations, project pursuits and business development, corridor studies, sidewalk, inspections, cost estimating, and presentations. Nathan’s experience includes working on successful corridor studies of Immokalee Road (2 miles), Wilson Boulevard (4 miles), and Collier Boulevard (4 miles). He has an excellent working relationship with Collier County’s Growth Management Department, Collier County Public Works Departments, Seminole Tribe of Florida, and extensive stakeholder interaction experience. Selected Projects Project Engineer. Pine Ridge Road Corridor Design, Collier County, FL.Assisting with the design of innovative intersection alternatives at Pine Ridge Road and Livingston Road which include a Jughandle, Continuous Flow Intersection, and a Single Point Urban Interchange as well as evaluating an R-cut innovative intersection. Specific responsibilities include creating roadway corridor linework alternatives, conceptual design drawings, cost estimate and cost benefit analyses, main electrical transmission utility relocation, technical memorandum and delivery, and facilitating multiple client workshop meetings. Project Engineer, Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study & Design, Collier County, FL.Assisting with the conceptual design of widening an existing 2 lane rural roadway to a 4-lane urban roadway with bike lanes, bridge replacement, box culvert extension, multi-use pathway and sidewalk. Specific responsibilities include creating roadway corridor linework, incorporating the adjacent Wilson Wellfield project along the corridor, conceptual design drawings, pond siting, wetland delineation, cost estimates, ROW mapping, and facilitating multiple public involvement and client workshop meetings. Project Engineer. Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening, Collier County, FL.Assisting with the median-widening design of 1.7 miles of an existing 4-lane roadway to a 6- lane facility. Specific responsibilities include creating roadway corridor linework, design of skewed double barrel 9’x5’ box culvert and accompanying temporary traffic control, conceptual design drawings, stakeholder involvement, cost estimates, and facilitating multiple workshop meetings. Project Engineer. Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, Collier County, FL.Assisting with the design of a new 7 mile 6-Lane roadway. Specific responsibilities include creating conceptual design drawings, pond siting, client workshops, wetland delineation, and facilitating multiple stakeholder involvement meetings. Project Manager & Project Engineer. General Services Contract – Transportation Planning, Collier County, FL.The County tasks Jacobs with various transportation planning projects throughout the County on an as-needed basis. Responsibilities as project manager include project kick-off, client coordination, and invoicing. Specific tasks under the General Services Contract include Bayshore Drive street diet, Danford Street roadway and drainage improvements, Palmetto Ridge Highschool traffic congestion study, Roundabout Review at Golden Gate Blvd/Desoto Blvd, Corkscrew Middle/Elementary School traffic congestion study, Town of Big Cypress future roadway concept, Camp Keais roundabout conceptual design, Pepper Ranch building assessment, creating conceptual design drawings, and multiple client workshops. Project Manager & Project Engineer. General Services Contract – Developer Responsibility, Collier County, FL.The County tasks Jacobs with various Developer Responsibility projects throughout the County on an as-needed basis to evaluate proposed developments and their connection and impact to the County transportation network. Responsibilities as project manager include project kick-off, client coordination, and invoicing. Specific tasks under the General Services Contract include Noah’s Way/Abercia North Development, Big Shots Golf Development, VA Hospital Development, Affordable Housing Development, Tractor Supply Co. Development, Group Housing Development, creating conceptual design drawings, and multiple client workshops. Page 1348 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C: RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 26 Continued: Nathan Lunsford, PE Project Engineer. Immokalee Road Corridor Study, FL.Assisting with the design of incorporating 3 innovative intersection improvements along Immokalee Road including a Continuous Flow Intersection, Diverging Diamond Interchange, and a Single Point Urban Interchange as well as conventional improvements to the other 6 intersections along the corridor’s limit, auxiliary lane design, box culvert extensions, and bridge replacements. Specific responsibilities include creating roadway corridor linework, conceptual design drawings, cost estimates, and facilitating multiple public involvement meetings. Project Engineer. Collier Boulevard III Widening & Bridge Location Study, Collier County, FL.Assisting with the design of widening an existing 4-lane urban roadway to a 6-lane urban roadway with bike lanes and multi-use pathway, auxiliary lane, and sidewalk. Specific responsibilities include creating roadway corridor linework, bridge location alternatives, adjacent developer coordination, conceptual design drawings, cost estimates and facilitating multiple public involvement and client workshop meetings. Project Engineer. Lake Trafford Road Bicycle and Drainage Improvements, Collier County, FL.Assisting with the design 5’ shoulder extensions to an existing 2 lane rural roadway and sidewalk design. Specific responsibilities include creating roadway corridor linework, conceptual design drawings, pond siting, cost estimates and facilitating multiple public client workshop meetings. Project Engineer and Manager. Collier County Water Control Structures Evaluation, Collier County, FL.Assisting with the inspections and evaluations of 59 weir structures (fixed and adjustable) throughout Collier County. Specific responsibilities include management of the project, field inspections of all weirs, report generation, GIS and KMZ file creation for Client, and conceptual design drawings. Project Engineer. Seminole Tribe of Florida, Big Cypress Reservation, FL.Inspecting the condition of several hundreds of existing signs in the Seminole Tribe of Florida. Specific responsibilities include field inspections, creating GIS linework for client, report generation and consolidation, project memorandum and delivery. Project Engineer. East Naples Community Park Electrical Evaluation and Pickleball Expansion, Collier County, FL.Assisting with the electrical design improvements an existing facility to incorporate the addition of several dozen pickleball courts and welcome center. Specific responsibilities include conceptual design drawings, cost estimates and facilitating multiple client workshop meetings. Project Engineer. Wilson Boulevard Widening Wellfield Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum, Collier County, FL.As part of the Wilson Boulevard Roadway Widening, a separate project of incorporating the Wellfields along the corridor included incorporating the Wilson Boulevard Widening design, conceptual design drawings, upgrading or relocating existing wellheads without interrupting production of the wells. Project Engineer. Pavement Evaluations, Collier County, FL.Inspecting the condition of several thousands of lane miles of pavement. Specific responsibilities include field inspections and verifying pavement, creating GIS linework for client, report generation and consolidation, project memorandum and delivery. Page 1349 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C: RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 27 Engineering Licenses Page 1350 of 5277 Cover LetterAPPENDIX C: RESUMES mes Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page C - 28Page 1351 of 5277 Page 1352 of 5277 Vendor Check List IMPORTANT:Please review carefully and submit with your Proposal/Bid. All applicable documents shall be submitted electronically through OpenGov. Vendor should checkoff each of the following items. Failure to provide the applicable documents may deem you non-responsive/non-responsible. ☒ General Bid Instructions has been acknowledged and accepted. ☒ Collier County Purchase Order Terms and Conditions have been acknowledged and accepted. ☒ Form 1: Vendor Declaration Statement ☒ Form 2: Conflict of Interest Certification ☒ Proof of status from Division of Corporations - Florida Department of State (If work performed in the State) - http://dos.myflorida.com/sunbiz/should be attached with your submittal. ☒Vendor MUST be enrolled in the E-Verify -https://www.e-verify.gov/at the time of submission of the proposal/bid. ☒ Form 3: Immigration Affidavit Certification MUST be signed and attached with your submittal. ☒ E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding or Company Profile page should be attached with your submittal. ☒ Form 4: Certification for Claiming Status as a Local Business,if applicable, has been executed and returned. Collier or Lee County Business Tax Receipt should be attached with your submittal to be considered. ☒ Form 5: Reference Questionnaire form must be utilized for each requested reference and included with your submittal, if applicable to the solicitation. ☒Form 6: Grant Provisions and Assurances package in its entirety,if applicable, are executed and should be included with your submittal. NOT APPLICABLE ☒ Vendor W-9 Form. ☒ Vendor acknowledges Insurance Requirements and is prepared to produce the required insurance certificate(s) within five (5) days of the County’s issuance of a Notice of Recommend Award. ☒ The Bid Schedule has been completed and attached with your submittal, applicable to bids. ☒ Copies of all requested licenses and/or certifications to complete the requirements of the project. ☒ All addenda have been signed and attached.NOT APPLICABLE ☒County’s IT Technical Architecture Requirements has been acknowledged and accepted, if applicable. ☒ Any and all supplemental requirements and terms has been acknowledged and accepted, if applicable. Page 1353 of 5277 Form 1: Vendor Declaration Statement BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners: The undersigned, as Vendor declares that this response is made without connection or arrangement with any other person and this proposal is in every respect fair and made in good faith, without collusion or fraud. The Vendor hereby declares the instructions, purchase order terms and conditions, requirements, and specifications/scope of work of this solicitation have been fully examined and accepted. The Vendor agrees, if this solicitation submittal is accepted by Collier County, to accept a Purchase Order as a form of a formal contract or to execute a Collier County formal contract for purposes of establishing a contractual relationship between the Vendor and Collier County, for the performance of all requirements to which this solicitation pertains. The Vendor states that the submitted is based upon the documents listed by the above referenced solicitation.The Vendor agrees to comply with the requirements in accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications denoted herein and according to the pricing submitted as a part of the Vendor’s bids. Further, the Vendor agrees that if awarded a contract for these goods and/or services, the Vendor will not be eligible to compete, submit a proposal, be awarded, or perform as a sub-vendor for any future associated work that is a result of this awarded contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto subscribed our names on this _18___ day of __November_______, 2024__ in the County of _Collier______________, in the State of _Florida____________. Firm’s Legal Name:Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Address:5811 Pelican Bay Blvd, Suite 305 City, State, Zip Code:Naples, FL 34108 Florida Certificate of Authority Document Number P13217 Federal Tax Identification Number *CCR # or CAGE Code *Only if Grant Funded 95-4081636____ ___________________________________________________________________ Telephone:239.860.4922 Email:Ellen.Patterson@jacobs.com Signature by: (Typed and written) Ellen B. Patterson Title:Vice President Page 1354 of 5277 Additional Contact Information Send payments to: (required if different from above) Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Company name used as payee Contact name:Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Title:Project Manager Address:800 Market Street, Lockbox 18713F City, State, ZIP St. Louis, MO 63150-8713 Telephone:239.860.4922 Email:Bill.gramer@jacobs.com Office servicing Collier County to place orders (required if different from above) Naples, FL Contact name:Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Title:Project Manager Address:5811 Pelican Bay Blvd, Suite 305 City, State, ZIP Naples, FL 34108 Telephone:239.860.4922 Email:Bill.gramer@jacobs.com Page 1355 of 5277 Form 2: Conflict of Interest Certification Affidavit The Vendor certifies that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, the past and current work on any Collier County project affiliated with this solicitation does not pose an organizational conflict as described by one of the three categories below: Biased ground rules – The firm has not set the “ground rules” for affiliated past or current Collier County project identified above (e.g., writing a procurement’s statement of work, specifications, or performing systems engineering and technical direction for the procurement) which appears to skew the competition in favor of my firm. Impaired objectivity – The firm has not performed work on an affiliated past or current Collier County project identified above to evaluate proposals / past performance of itself or a competitor, which calls into question the contractor’s ability to render impartial advice to the government. Unequal access to information – The firm has not had access to nonpublic information as part of its performance of a Collier County project identified above which may have provided the contractor (or an affiliate) with an unfair competitive advantage in current or future solicitations and contracts. In addition to this signed affidavit, the contractor / vendor must provide the following: 1.All documents produced as a result of the work completed in the past or currently being worked on for the above-mentioned project; and, 2.Indicate if the information produced was obtained as a matter of public record (in the “sunshine”) or through non-public (not in the “sunshine”) conversation (s), meeting(s), document(s) and/or other means. Failure to disclose all material or having an organizational conflict in one or more of the three categories above be identified, may result in the disqualification for future solicitations affiliated with the above referenced project(s). By the signature below, the firm (employees, officers and/or agents) certifies, and hereby discloses, that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, all relevant facts concerning past, present, or currently planned interest or activity (financial, contractual, organizational, or otherwise) which relates to the project identified above has been fully disclosed and does not pose an organizational conflict. _Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.___________ Company Name _____________________________________ Signature ____Ellen B. Patterson, Vice President__________________ Print Name and Title State of _Florida__________________ County of _Palm Beach________________ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of ☐ physical presence or ☒online notarization, this __18___day of _November______ (month), 2024 (year), by Carlos Alonso-Fernandez (name of person acknowledging). _________________________________________ (Signature of Notary Public) ___Carlos Alonso-Fernandez________________________ (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) Personally Known OR Produced Identification ______________________________________ Type of Identification Produced Page 1356 of 5277 Form 3: Immigration Affidavit Certification This Affidavit is required and should be signed, by an authorized principal of the firm and submitted with formal solicitation submittals. Further, Vendors are required to be enrolled in the E-Verify program (https://www.e-verify.gov/), at the time of the submission of the Vendor’s proposal/bid. Acceptable evidence of your enrollment consists of a copy of the properly completed E- Verify Company Profile page or a copy of the fully executed E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding for the company which will be produced at the time of the submission of the Vendor’s proposal/bid or within five (5) day of the County’s Notice of Recommend Award. FAILURE TO EXECUTE THIS AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATION AND SUBMIT WITH VENDOR’S PROPOSAL/BID MAY DEEM THE VENDOR’S AS NON-RESPONSIVE. Collier County will not intentionally award County contracts to any Vendor who knowingly employs unauthorized alien workers, constituting a violation of the employment provision contained in 8 U.S.C. Section 1324 a(e) Section 274A(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). Collier County may consider the employment by any Vendor of unauthorized aliens a violation of Section 274A (e) of the INA. Such Violation by the recipient of the Employment Provisions contained in Section 274A (e) of the INA shall be grounds for unilateral termination of the contract by Collier County. Vendor attests that they are fully compliant with all applicable immigration laws (specifically to the 1986 Immigration Act and subsequent Amendment(s),that it is aware of and in compliance with the requirements set forth in Florida Statutes §448.095, and agrees to comply with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding with E-Verify and to provide proof of enrollment in The Employment Eligibility Verification System (E-Verify), operated by the Department of Homeland Security in partnership with the Social Security Administration at the time of submission of the Vendor’s proposal/bid. _Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.___________ Company Name _____________________________________ Signature __Ellen B. Patterson, Vice President______________ Print Name and Title State of _Florida__________________ County of _Palm Beach________________ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of ☐ physical presence or ☒online notarization, this __18___day of _November______ (month), 2024 (year), by Carlos Alonso-Fernandez (name of person acknowledging). _________________________________________ (Signature of Notary Public) _____ Carlos Alonso-Fernandez ___________________________________ (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) Personally Known OR Produced Identification ______________________________________ Type of Identification Produced Page 1357 of 5277 Page 1358 of 5277 Page 1359 of 5277 Page 1360 of 5277 Page 1361 of 5277 Page 1362 of 5277 Page 1363 of 5277 Page 1364 of 5277 Page 1365 of 5277 Page 1366 of 5277 Page 1367 of 5277 Page 1368 of 5277 Page 1369 of 5277 Page 1370 of 5277 Page 1371 of 5277 Page 1372 of 5277 Page 1373 of 5277 Page 1374 of 5277 Page 1375 of 5277 Page 1376 of 5277 Page 1377 of 5277 Page 1378 of 5277 Page 1379 of 5277 Page 1380 of 5277 Page 1381 of 5277 Page 1382 of 5277 Page 1383 of 5277 Form 4: Vendor Submittal – Local Vendor Preference Certification (Check Appropriate Boxes Below) State of Florida (Select County if Vendor is described as a Local Business) ☒ Collier County Lee County Vendor affirms that it is a local business as defined by the Procurement Ordinance of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners and the Regulations Thereto. As defined in Section Fifteen of the Collier County Procurement Ordinance: Local business means the vendor has a current Business Tax Receipt issued by the Collier County Tax Collector prior to bid or proposal submission to do business within Collier County, and that identifies the business with a permanent physical business address located within the limits of Collier County from which the vendor’s staff operates and performs business in an area zoned for the conduct of such business. A Post Office Box or a facility that receives mail, or a non-permanent structure such as a construction trailer, storage shed, or other non-permanent structure shall not be used for the purpose of establishing said physical address. In addition to the foregoing, a vendor shall not be considered a "local business" unless it contributes to the economic development and well-being of Collier County in a verifiable and measurable way. This may include, but not be limited to, the retention and expansion of employment opportunities, support and increase to the County's tax base, and residency of employees and principals of the business within Collier County. Vendors shall affirm in writing their compliance with the foregoing at the time of submitting their bid or proposal to be eligible for consideration as a "local business" under this section. A vendor who misrepresents the Local Preference status of its firm in a proposal or bid submitted to the County will lose the privilege to claim Local Preference status for a period of up to one year under this section. Vendor must complete the following information: Year Business Established in ☒ Collier County or Lee County: _2004_______ Number of Employees (Including Owner(s) or Corporate Officers):_52,000________ Number of Employees Living in ☒ Collier County or ☒ Lee (Including Owner(s) or Corporate Officers):_73______ If requested by the County, Vendor will be required to provide documentation substantiating the information given in this certification.Failure to do so will result in vendor’s submission being deemed not applicable. Sign and Date Certification: Under penalties of perjury, I certify that the information shown on this form is correct to my knowledge. Company Name: __Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.________________Date: __November 18, 2024________ Address in Collier or Lee County: _5811 Pelican Bay Blvd, Suite 305_, Naples, FL 34108________________________ Signature: ____________________________________________Title: _Vice President________________ Page 1384 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 1 3. PAST PERFORMANCE References Client reference forms for projects similar in nature to the scope of the Everglades Blvd. Widening project can be found on the following pages. Ref #Project Name Client Score 1 Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Collier County 100 2 Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Design (Collier Boulevard to 16th Street NE)Collier County 99 3 Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening (US 41 to Fontana Del Sol Way)Collier County 99 4 State Road (Sr) 806/Atlantic Ave from W. Of State Road (Sr) 7 to East of Lyons Road FDOT District 4 97 Page 1385 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 12 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Reference Form #1: Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Client:Collier County Our Role: Prime Size: 3.2 Miles Key Personnel: Bill Gramer, Nathan Lunsford, Felicia Kirby, Nick De Ciccio, Kevin Heldorfer, Rick Gorsira, Sonal Dodia, Darren Dyer, Vanessa Davis Relevance 2-lane rural to 4-lane urban roadway widening Significant ROW requirements Stormwater analysis/design Project site and design constraints Stakeholder involvement Utility impacts analysis and coordination Project Description and Services Provided On this study, our team evaluated alternatives to widen Wilson Boulevard from a 2-lane undivided roadway to a 4- lane divided roadway with curb and gutter from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road (approximately 3.2 miles). The study involved evaluating alternative alignments to improve mobility, enhance safety, and accommodate future traffic volumes while avoiding or minimizing impacts to the community and natural environment. Proposed improvements also included adding sidewalks, a shared-use path, and bike lanes for improved multimodal mobility and bus stop enhancements. Additional project elements included changes to access at the intersections, drainage system upgrades, replacement of the existing bridge, utility relocation, and right-of-way acquisition. As the prime consultant, our team provided access management analysis, alternatives analysis, preliminary bridge type selection report, drainage and pond siting analysis, utility analysis, environmental analysis, right-of-way analysis, a public involvement meeting, and cost estimates. Jacobs’ experience conducting the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study and subsequent Wilson Boulevard Widening design gives us unique insight into the Everglades Boulevard widening design., due to their similar nature. Key subconsultants and delivery partners Johnson Engineering – Survey Ardaman & Associates, Inc. – Geotechnical ACH – Archeological Survey Page 1386 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 13 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Intersection of Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Bill Gramer with Collier County staff during the Tamiami Wellfield Wilson Boulevard Widening Impact Study field meeting. Proper well house driveway access along Wilson Boulevard for utility and maintenance vehicles will be incorporated into design Feedback from public meeting participants: Thank you for your help and continued help with being proactive in these growth demand problems! I strongly believe this department(s) [is] the most productive and best results producing department in all of Collier County areas of responsibilities.” Very informative meeting; hoping to be kept in the loop as the project develops.” Project manager Bill Gramer interfacing with members of the community at the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study Public meeting Members of the community interacting with renderings at the Wilson Boulevard Widening Corridor Study public meeting ““ Page 1387 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 14 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Reference Form #2: Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Client:Collier County Our Role: Prime Size: 7 miles of roadway and 314 acres Key Personnel: Bill Gramer, Kevin Heldorfer, Nick De Ciccio, Felicia Kirby, Nathan Lunsford Rick Gorsira, Sonal Dodia, Darren Dyer, Adam Ahmad, Vanessa Davis Relevance New 6-lane and 2-lane roadway facilities with a shared-use pathway In-depth knowledge of the Golden Gate Estates area conditions, including hydrology and permitting with FDEP/ACOE and SFWMD on environmental, wetland mitigation, Extensive public involvement/stakeholder engagement Experience working with the County for ROW acquisition and the settlement process Familiarity with Golden Gate Estates area residents’ concerns developed over numerous public involvement meetings across multiple years Utility impacts analysis and coordination Project Description and Services Provided The Vanderbilt Beach Road (VBR) Extension project involves widening and designing a new 7-mile road from east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) to 16th Street Northeast. Our team led public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, traffic maintenance, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical access management, and utility services. The project involves relocating a 2-mile section of the Cypress Canal to a location south of the roadway and included three new bridges at Curry Canal, Corkscrew Canal, and Orange Tree Canal. Our design includes minor improvements to existing intersecting streets at Weber Boulevard, Danbury Boulevard, Massey Street, Douglas Street, Wilson Boulevard, 8th Street Northeast, and 16th Street Northeast and a new intersection to Greyhawk Trail for the Golf Club of The Everglades. We provided stormwater management at 16 drainage basins, including 11 wet detention ponds and 5 dry detention ponds to treat water quality prior to discharge to Page 1388 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 15 3. PAST PERFORMANCE the canals. We coordinated regularly with SFWMD on the conceptual ERP permit and construction permit. We also provided utility relocation and design for wastewater, potable, and raw water mains. The project included ROW acquisition with over 276 parcels across 314 acres. Jacobs prepared an environmental assessment, developed innovative approaches to wetland delineations, and performed FLUCCS mapping using a mobile data collection platform. We prepared a listed species assessment, conducted surveys, and assessed wetland and other surface water impacts. We coordinated mitigation credits for the County to help them purchase from mitigation banks from impacts to both wetlands and the Florida panther. An environmental resource permit was issued by SFWMD in 2021 with a single request for additional information (RAI). We coordinated with USACOE and FDEP and obtained a state 404 permit. Key subconsultants and delivery partners Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. Capital Consulting Solutions Johnson Engineering, Inc. RWA Engineering Page 1389 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 16 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Reference Form #3: Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening Client:Collier County Our Role: Prime Size: 1.7 Miles Key Personnel: Bill Gramer, Nick De Ciccio, Nathan Lunsford, Felicia Kirby, Kevin Heldorfer, Sonal Dodia, Darren Dyer, Adam Ahmad, Vanessa Davis Relevance Roadway widening Maintaining the flow of traffic during construction Permitting (SFWMD) Utility coordination/design Extensive stakeholder coordination Project Description and Services Provided Jacobs managed the widening of 1.7 miles of the existing four-lane roadway to a 6-lane facility (Median Widening). Tasks included public involvement meetings, roadway design, drainage, permitting (SFWMD), MOT, structural design of a double barrel 9’ x 5’ box culvert to replace an existing 72” pipe, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. The design bid plans have been submitted, and constructed is anticipated to start in the summer of 2025. Johnson Engineering and Capital Consulting are our sub consultants on this project, providing a synergy and familiarity that will carry over to this project. Key subconsultants and delivery partners Johnson Engineering – SUE, Utility Design Capital Consulting – Signing and Pavement Marking, MOT Page 1390 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 17 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Our team held a public involvement meeting informing the public of the roadway widening improvements and impacts during construction. Our team prepared 3D renders illustrating the temporary traffic control plans for the installation of the double barrel 9’ x 5’ box culvert. Our team has also held numerous public engagement meetings with the Pelican Marsh Community, homeowners’ association boards, and Naples Christian Church to educate the stakeholders about the impacts of the widening and the box culvert installation, and how our team has implemented multiple mitigation efforts to minimize impact to their establishments. Our team performed multiple field reviews with County staff to review project elements/issues and develop solutions. Page 1391 of 5277 3. Past Performance Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page 3 - 18 3. PAST PERFORMANCE Reference Form #4: FDOT Client:FDOT District 4 Our Role: Prime Size: 1.5 Miles Key Personnel: Joseph Martin, Colleen Ross, Tara Jones Relevance 2-lane to 4-lane widening Maintaining the flow of traffic during construction Utility coordination/design Extensive stakeholder coordination Project Description and Services Provided Jacobs designed the widening of 1.5 miles of State Road 806/Atlantic AVE from an existing 2-lane rural roadway to a 4-lane divided roadway with accommodations for a future 6-lane roadway (median widening). The project included 6’ sidewalks and 7’ buffered bicycle lanes on both sides of the roadway, expanding the intersection of SR 7 and SR 806 to include a third northbound and southbound through lane and a second northbound right turn lane on SR 7, expanding the intersection of Lyons Rd and SR 806 to include three eastbound and westbound lanes, dual eastbound and westbound left turn lanes, and single eastbound and westbound right turn lanes, and to relocate Lake Worth Drainage District L-34 Canal to accommodate the widening. This process also engaged the public with an in-person public involvement meeting in coordination with FDOT. Page 1392 of 5277 Page 1393 of 5277 Page 1394 of 5277 Page 1395 of 5277 Page 1396 of 5277 Page 1397 of 5277 Page 1398 of 5277 Page 1399 of 5277 Page 1400 of 5277 Page 1401 of 5277 Page 1402 of 5277 Page 1403 of 5277 Page 1404 of 5277 Page 1405 of 5277 Page 1406 of 5277 Page 1407 of 5277 Page 1408 of 5277 Page 1409 of 5277 Page 1410 of 5277 Page 1411 of 5277 Page 1412 of 5277 Page 1413 of 5277 Page 1414 of 5277 Page 1415 of 5277 Page 1416 of 5277 Page 1417 of 5277 Page 1418 of 5277 Fonn W•9 Request for Taxpayer Give Fonn to the (Rev. October 2018) Identification Number and Certification requester. Do not Department ol the Treasuiy send to the IRS. lntilmal Revooue Service ► Go to www.lrs.gov/FormW9 for Instructions and the latest information. 1 Name (as shown on your Income tax return), Name Is nlqUlred on this lino; do not leave thlJ Une blank. JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. 2 8uaineu nameldlsn,ganied eotlty name, if different from above (') 3 Che<:k appropriate bo11 fQf federal ta,c classlftc:ation of the person whose name Is entwed °" line 1. Cheek only on• of the 4 Exemptions (codes apply only to t following seven boxes. cettaln entities, not lndlvidi.lats: eee IZJ C Corpotallon D TIUSt/estato lnstMtlons on page 3): � 0 Individual/sole proprietor or D S Corporation 0 Partna1$hlp � i slnglO·member U.C Exempt payee Code (II any) la □Limited Uabillty company. Enter lhe !all Cla$$11icatlon (C,.C corporation, s-s COfl)Oralion, P•Partnetshlp) ►�i Note: Check the appropriate box In the fine above for the tax clasamcatlon ol the single•member owner. Oo not check Exemptioo from FATCA repo,tlng fu LLC II the LLC Is classlfied as a slngl&-mamber U.C that Is disregatded from lho owner unless ll1e owner ol the LLC Is eode(tlany) another LLC that Is not disregan:ted from the OWfflll' for U.S. fedel'al tax pl#J)()SeS, Otherwise, a slng!e•membet LLC that= Is disn,garded from !he owner shOuld check the appropriate bo1t lot the tax classiflcallon ot Its owner.·u D Other (see lnstructiQna) ► �,.,_,,_autsldt..,_11.S) & 5 Address (number. slteel, and ept. or suite no.) See lnstructlona. Requester's name and address (opllonaU U) I 1999 BRYAN STREET u City, state , 11nd ZIP c;Qde DALLAS, TX 75201 7 Lisi account numbefta) here (optlonaU .Tax1>aver Identification Number mM I Social MCUrity number I Enter you� TIN In the app_rop�te box. The TIN provided must match �e name given on ine 1 to avoidbackup w1lhholdlng, For individuals, this i5 generally your social security numbw {SSN), However, for a resident alien, sole proprietor, or disregarded entity, see the Instructions for Part I, later. For other entities, it is your employer ldentlflcation number (ElN). If you do not have a number, see How to get a TIN, later. ITlJ -DJ -I I I I I or Note: lf the account is In more than one !lame, ,ee the instF\lclions f0t line 1. Also see What Nama snd Number To Give the Requester for guidelines on whose number to enter. I Employer 1c1entlfloet1on nw'1bor Certiflcatton Under penaltiel> of perjury, I certify that: 1.The number shown on this form Is my correct taxpayet Identification number (or I am wafting for a number to be Issued to me): and2.I am not subjoct to backup wlthholdin9 because: (a) l am exempt from backup withholding, or (b) I have not been notified by the lntema1 RevenueService (IRS) that I am subject to backup withhOldlng as a result of a failure to report all Interest or dividends, or (c) the IRS has notified me that I amno longer subject to backup withholding; and 3. I am a U.S. citizen or other U.S. person (defined below): and 4. The FATCA code(s) entered on this fonn �f any) Indicating that 1 am exempt from FATCA reporting la correct. Certification Instructions. You must cross out Item 2 above if you have been notified by the IRS that you are currently subject to backup withholding because you have faffed to report all interest and dividends on your tax retum. For real estate transactions, item 2 does not apply, For mortgage Interest paid, acquisition or abandonment of secured property, canceUatlon of debt, contributions to an individual retirement arrangement (IRA), and generally, payments other than interest and di ou are not required to sign the certification, but you must provide your cooect TIN. See the lnstructlons for Part 11, later. ns tntemal Revenue Code unless otherwise Futu,. developments. For the latest inlonnatlon about developments related to Fonn W-9 and ils Instructions, such as legislation enacted after they were published, go to www.lrs.gov/FormW9. Purpose of Form An individual or entity (Form W-9 requester) who is required to file an Information retum with the IRS must obtain your correct taxpayer ldentlflcation number {TIN) which may be your social security number ($SN), Individual taitpayer identlflcation number (ITIN), adoption ta11payer ldentificatlon number {ATIN), or employer idemllication nulllQeT {EIN}. to report on an Information return the amount i:,ald to you, or other amount reportable on an Information retum. Examples of information returns include, but are not fimlted to, the following. •Form 1099-INT finterest eamed or paid} Cat. No. 10231X October 1, 2024 •Form 1099-DIV (dividends, including those frcm stocks or mutualfunds) • Form 1099•MISC (various types of Income, priles, awards, or grossproceeds) •Form 1099·8 (stock or mutual fund :.ales and certain othertransactions by brokers) • Fonn 1099-S (proceeds from real estate transactions} • Form 1099-K (merchant card and third party network transactions) •Form 1098 (home mortgage Interest), 1098-E (student loan Interest),1 09S. T (tuition) • Form 1099-C (canceled debt) • Fom, � 099-A (acquisition or abandonment ol secured property) Use Form W•9 onlv if vou are a U.S. person Qncluding a residentalien). to provide your c:otrect TIN. If you do not tetum Form W-9 to the requester with a TIN, you mightbe subject to backup withholding. See What is backup withholding, later. Form W�9 (Rev. 10-201&) Page 1419 of 5277 Proof of status from Division of Corporations – Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Page 1420 of 5277 Page 1421 of 5277 Page 1422 of 5277 Page 1423 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -1 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1424 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -2 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1425 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -3 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1426 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -4 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1427 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -5 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1428 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -6 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1429 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -7 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1430 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -8 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1431 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -9 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1432 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -10 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1433 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -11 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1434 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -12 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1435 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -13 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1436 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -14 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1437 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -15 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1438 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -16 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1439 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -17 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1440 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -18 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1441 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -19 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1442 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -20 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1443 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page A -21 APPENDIX A: REQUIRED FORMS Page 1444 of 5277 Page 1445 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page B -1 APPENDIX B: LICENSES Collier County Business Tax License – Engineering Business Collier County Business Tax License – Administrative Office Page 1446 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page B -2 APPENDIX B: LICENSES Page 1447 of 5277 Design Services for Everglades Blvd Widening from Oil Well Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext | RPS No. 24-8313 Page B -3 APPENDIX B: LICENSES Page 1448 of 5277