Agenda 03/25/2025 Item # 2B (BCC Workshop Minutes 03/04/2025)
Page 1
March 4, 2025
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Naples, Florida - March 4, 2025
WORKSHOP
LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Board of County
Commissioners, in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as
the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such
special districts as have been created according to law and having
conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in SPECIAL
SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples,
Florida, with the following Board members present:
Chairman: Burt L. Saunders
Dan Kowal
Chris Hall
Rick LoCastro
William L. McDaniel, Jr.
ALSO PRESENT:
Amy Patterson, County Manager
Ed Finn, Deputy County Manager
Jeffrey A. Klatzkow, County Attorney
Troy Miller, Communications & Customer Relations
Page 132 of 5415
Page 2
March 4, 2025
MS. PATTERSON: Chair, you have a live mic.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Thank you.
Ms. Patterson, we have -- we're going to start off the
meeting hopefully in the right way. I'm going to ask
Commissioner Hall to lead us in the prayer, and then I'm going to
ask Commissioner LoCastro to lead us in the Pledge.
Item #1
INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - INVOCATION
GIVEN BY COMMISSIONER HALL; PLEDGE LED BY
COMMISSIONER LOCASTRO
COMMISSIONER HALL: Father, we just thank you. We
come to you today asking you for your presence and your
wisdom. We love you, we trust you, and we welcome your
presence in the meeting, and we pray this in the name of Jesus.
Amen.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Please join me.
(The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.)
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Just a reminder to folks that
may want to speak on any particular topic, if you've not already
done so, please register to speak, and we'll call you on the
specific item that you want to comment on.
Ms. Patterson.
MS. PATTERSON: Welcome to our March 4th workshop.
Item #2A
CLAM PASS - PRESENTED BY NEIL DORRILL
Page 133 of 5415
Page 3
March 4, 2025
(ADMINISTRATOR PELICAN BAY SERVICES), CHAD
COLEMAN (DEPUTY DIRECTOR PELICAN BAY SERVICES),
AND DR. MOHAMED DABEES (PROJECT ENGINEER -
HUMISTON & MOORE) – DISCUSSED WITH DIRECTION
GIVEN
MS. PATTERSON: We have several topics on the agenda
today, so we're going to jump right in and start out with Item 2A,
which is Clam Pass. We have several self members from the
Pelican Bay Services Department here -- or Division here to
present and to answer questions.
So with that, let me turn it over to Mr. Dorrill.
MR. DORRILL: Good morning, Commissioners, and
thank you for what you do. Additionally, with me today is our
deputy director, Chad Coleman. I also have Jeremy Sterk, who
is our leading environmentalist, and Dr. Mohamed Dabees, who
is our coastal engineer who can speak separately to both civil
engineering issues as well as water-quality issues and the
management plan that is in place there.
I think what I'd like to do is perhaps give you a quick
overview and history of the more modern times associated with
the system that is there. And I'll need a little help flipping
through these slides.
What I want to do is I want to talk a little bit about dredging.
The permits, there are two that are behind the dredging. The fact
that the Clam Bay system was the county's first Natural Resource
Protection Area and designated as such and then what that entails
and then specifically the management plan that is in place there.
With that, I would want you to know that from the
beginning, I think the Clam Bay residents and taxpayers have
Page 134 of 5415
Page 4
March 4, 2025
really been wonderful stewards of your first Natural Resource
Protection Area. They have devoted themselves to the science
and the research behind what is one of the smallest natural inlets
on the West Coast of Florida, and they have spent an awful high
amount of their own tax dollars, in addition to support from the
BCC, where applicable for both their beaches and the mangroves
and the inlet itself.
I want to go back about 25 years this morning. The first
real I'll call it modern-day issues associated with the system
began in the late '90s. Fortunately, a year after I left county
government. And so it manifests itself in a fairly large
mangrove die-off that occurred in the north end of the system.
There was widespread concern throughout the entire area as to
what was causing the mangrove die-off that began in 1998.
And so that began the first attempt to create a management
plan and a set of circumstances and conditions in support of the
system. It also resulted in a fairly novel and innovative series of
miles of hand-dug channels in the north end of the system to be
able to convey stormwater out of the system and into the
saltwater system as a way of saving the mangroves. But that all
started in the late 1990s with the first management plan and then
the first joint permit between the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection and the Army Corps of Engineers.
The first hydraulic dredge occurred the following year, in
1999. The system has been hydraulically dredged with a mini
dredge on at least three occasions and has been mechanically
dredged with either drag lines or track hoes or excavators on
about seven other occasions over the last 25 years. Every two to
three years, the system needs some sort of help in that regard.
Let's go to the next slide.
Page 135 of 5415
Page 5
March 4, 2025
The permit was set to expire in 2008, and over the course of
the last 25 years, approximately 21 of those years the Pelican Bay
Services Division was responsible for the operation,
maintenance, and oversight of Clam Bay and the estuary that is
there. There was a brief period of time when our colleagues at
Coastal Zone Management were responsible for the system.
And as a result of some changes in the design parameters and a
fair amount of opposition within the environmental community
countywide and Pelican Bay in particular, there were a series of
challenges associated with the inlet there that delayed the
issuance of a permit even with an extension.
The long and the short of it was that in 2012 the inlet closed
completely and created a fair amount of alarm on the part of
people throughout the entire urban area as a result of that. And
with a revision to our ordinance the following year in 2013, the
stewardship of that system was given back to the Pelican Bay
Services Division.
And at the same time, the pass was reopened mechanically.
This is actually a picture from about 12 years ago when that
occurred.
Next slide.
In conjunction with that and with an effort to obtain new
10-year permits from both the Army Corps and the DEP, there
was a condition put upon us which became, I think, a
bell-weather event, that there needed to be a new and more
comprehensive approach to the management plan that was in
place.
So the following year, after the pass was reopened -- again,
this is a picture of a post-event there -- work was underway.
There were an astounding number of 28 public meetings and
Page 136 of 5415
Page 6
March 4, 2025
workshops that took place during that particular period of time.
Next slide.
So these are the various elements of what became Collier
County's first Natural Resource Protection Area and the overlay
for that. You can see the legal description in the boundary on
the exhibit that is there to the left. It shows very well inner,
outer, and upper Clam Bay, which are very integral to the system
there.
The original goal was to establish a basin in conjunction
with the permits, and the permits are tied to the management plan
and cannot be amended or changed unless the management plan
is supportive of that change.
The objectives, though, were to maintain and protect the
very unique natural flora and fauna within the various
communities that were there to ensure; number two, that the
estuary had an adequate tidal prism or flushing and combination
of freshwater flows out of the inlet, perhaps most importantly to
monitor and control water quality. Believe it or not, there are
some ancient Calusa archaeological shell middens that are there
that are incorporated within the plan and unique protection status
given to the archaeological sites; and then to promote passive
recreation. And those were the original goals of the Board of
County Commissioners at the time that the plan was taken
underway.
Next slide.
The plan was finally adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners in 2015, and as a result of that, new permits were
issued early the following year by both the Corps and the DEP
for maintenance, dredging activities, and a whole host of
conditions associated with what is now an annual report that
Page 137 of 5415
Page 7
March 4, 2025
needs to be compiled and submitted and approved by the board at
Pelican Bay Services.
Again, there had been a total of about 12 events, either
excavation, grading, mechanical dredging, or the hydraulic
dredging with the little mini dredgers that have taken place over
time. Our costs have been the lowest per cubic yard of any
comparable work because I'd like to think that we thought a little
bit outside the box, and, frankly, we were able to do certain
things mechanically as opposed to paying fairly high
mobilization costs on the part of people who own and operate
mini dredges in environments like this.
Former County Manager Ochs commissioned a five-year
review of the management plan and the operating parameters that
occurred in 2019, and it was accepted at that time.
Here is a copy -- and did we bring extra copies? Let's pass
those out.
This is the current design dredge, fill, and grading template
for the inlet. It might be helpful. It's hard to read this one, so
we brought copies when we get into questions and answers and
concerns on the part of our city residents who are to the south of
us.
The average dredge cut is anywhere between four and a half
to five and a half NVD, which is essentially mean sea level. It is
a fairly shallow design dredge cut, and that is for particular
reasons that enhance the outgoing tide's flushing ability to flush
or to scour out sand that finds its way into the inlet.
There are three different sections. Section A is actually the
mouth of the inlet. It has the deepest parameters. Section B
historically has the largest accumulation of sand that will impact
the system. Section C, to the east where it makes a 90-degree
Page 138 of 5415
Page 8
March 4, 2025
turn and heads south into the bay there, has the least amount of
sand.
The most recent bathymetric surveys which were submitted
in January --
DR. DABEES: February.
MR. DORRILL: February, this past month, show that
there's currently about 10,000 cubic yards of material in the
system. The highest in history was when the pass closed back in
2012. It had 20,000 cubic yards. On average, it will have
anywhere between 13,000 to 13,500 cubic yards before it needs
help. And the way that we know that is through underwater
bathymetric surveys, and also we measure tide levels in real time,
and we correlate the difference in the tide between low tide and
high tide. And we need to have at least a half a foot of
difference between low tide and high tide in terms of elevation in
order to get enough water into the system on an incoming tide to
be able to help with that scour and prolong the ability for this
thing to maintain itself.
And currently, it has been in excess of six-tenths of a
percent. So while it's got 10,000 cubic yards of sand in it, as
reported last month, the tide range ratios are still about a tenth to
about a 15-tenths of a foot over where they need to be, which is a
good thing.
As a result of that, as I stand here today, I don't believe that
we will try to rush to do a dredge event there in advance of sea
turtle nesting season. I think the preference and
recommendations of our engineers and consultants would be we'd
be better off to wait till the fall at the end of sea turtle nesting
season and hopefully what will not be a busy tropical storm
season.
Page 139 of 5415
Page 9
March 4, 2025
The entire system is very, very affected by wave energy and
prevailing winds. Prevailing winds, over time, is measured, and
within our management report prominently come from the west
on shore. And if you have a bad hurricane season where the
winds are from the south, west, or the west/southwest, it pushes a
lot of that beach renourishment sand up into the system, and that
has been an area of concern.
We've had a number of beach renourishment projects in the
last three years. There's one currently underway this year in
Park Shore. Some of that sand will be up in Clam Pass at the
park in the inlet probably this time next year. There's another
beach renourishment project that is contemplated, I believe, for
Vanderbilt and Pelican Bay. During the winter cold front
season, some of that sand can push south as well.
So we're dealing with a lot of dynamics, but we're primarily
dealing with historical prevailing winds, the intensity of the
winds, and the height of the waves. And so wave energy is
something that we monitor very closely.
Next slide.
A little bit of the most recent history and work associated
there. Really, in the last eight years, there have been about six
events. Some of that is because of the hurricane activity of the
most recent period of time. And, again, over the course of that
time, there was only one hydraulic dredge, and the last one
occurred seven years ago in 2018. So, again, it's fairly rare for
us to do and commission a hydraulic dredging event. We've
been very effective over time and very cost effective by being
able to do both grading and excavation and mechanical dredging
where necessary.
Next slide.
Page 140 of 5415
Page 10
March 4, 2025
I already talked a little bit about this. The current permit
expires a year from today, and so permit renewal is underway.
Fortunately, the new cycles are that they will be 15-year permits,
not 10-year permits. And so that work is underway as we speak
at the moment.
You will probably hear from residents of Naples Cay and
Seagate today. They sort of commissioned an independent civil
engineering review of the management plan and the current
dredge and fill and grading parameters of our management plan
and are going to have some recommendations of their own. I
think we're willing to explore or evaluate or model alternatives,
but it would need to take place as part of a permit modification or
a permit amendment.
The time that it takes and the review and the comment and
the notice periods, I would not want to be trying to evaluate
alternative designs over the course of the next 12 months to
potentially change the fill and cut characteristics of a dredge
event. It is better to do that through an amendment process, and
we have done that in the current cycle.
As a result of a lot of the beach renourishment sand, the fill
template, or where I can put the sand when we remove it from the
inlet, we ran out of capacity. The current management plan
obligates us to fill to capacity the public park first at Clam Pass
before any of the sand can go on the north side of the inlet and
onto the beaches at Pelican Bay.
We ran out of places to place sand both in terms of elevation
and length and width, and so we amended the most recent permits
about a year and a half ago to be able to enlarge and lengthen
further north and further south on the fill side, and it's a much
easier process. So if we're going to contemplate any changes to
Page 141 of 5415
Page 11
March 4, 2025
the design, it needs to be as part of a little more deliberative
process, I think.
With that, I want to stop because I had sort of thought
we'd -- you know, my comments from an overview perspective
could be accomplished in about 15 minutes. What I would like
to do is see what initial questions or observations are there on the
part of the Commission and then see whether or not our two
consultants this morning feel like they should elaborate and then
presumably turn to the public. So happy to answer your
questions.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Thank you. That was very
well done, very informative.
Are there any questions or comments from the Commission
before we turn to the public?
Commissioner Hall -- oh, I'm sorry.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: You can let him go first.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Okay. Commissioner Hall.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I was just quicker on the
button than he was.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Thank you, Mr. Dorrill.
So I have several little questions. And I may have missed
it, but just what happened when Mother Nature was in charge? I
know that this thing closed one year and that there was a die-off.
But way before that, what happened with this pass?
MR. DORRILL: Going back into the late '60s and early
'70s, dredge and fill --
COMMISSIONER HALL: I remember that.
MR. DORRILL: -- development both north and south took
place in the Naples Cay/Seagate/Parkshore Unit 5, which is the
most northern, and all of the Vanderbilt Beach Estates and the
Page 142 of 5415
Page 12
March 4, 2025
Vanderbilt Lagoon. So it went from an identical type of
mangrove estuary to a 1960s, 1970s dredge/fill canal in the
backyard sort of approach.
As a result of that, the hydraulics of Clam Pass were altered.
While there is a series of culverts that are underneath the main
drive into Naples Cay and Seagate, there's not a lot of tidal
flushing or transfer that takes place there. And the northern end
of what was a long linear mangrove estuary was blocked when
Vanderbilt Beach Road was constructed, and then the ensuing
Connors Estate and Vanderbilt Beach communities were
developed in the early 1970s.
COMMISSIONER HALL: All right.
MR. DORRILL: So we've got a system that is hampered or
hamstrung and needs help in order to prevent what actually
occurred in my hometown in Sarasota at Midnight Pass. About
40, 50 years ago the pass closed, the commission elected to let
Mother Nature take its course under those -- it never reopened.
It reopened briefly following Hurricane Helene, I think, and
closed up like a day later. So systems that are hampered need
some help from a hydrology perspective because, otherwise, they
will fail over time. It's a great question.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Yeah. I wasn't advocating for
that. I was just -- so basically, the development spread the
water -- spread the flow out, and that's the reason why we need
help today. I get that.
So secondly, how long does it take? How long does the
dredge take? You know, you said we can't do it before sea turtle
season, or we don't recommend that. But I was just curious as to
how long it takes to dredge it.
MR. DORRILL: I'm going to get Chad to help answer that
Page 143 of 5415
Page 13
March 4, 2025
from a procurement side, because it takes much longer to do the
preconstruction than it takes to actually physically do the work.
MR. COLEMAN: The physical work is only about a
month’s worth of work, but going through the procurement
process and getting the right contracts -- right now we're using a
beach maintenance contract, which has expired, and we're
looking for an extension there.
We've talked with Coastal Zone about including a hydraulic
piece to that because right now it's just mechanical. But actual
construction, you're looking at a month to two months for actual
physical work: Mobilization, execution, and demobilization.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: For our record, could you go
ahead and state your name.
MR. COLEMAN: Chad Coleman, operations -- my title
changed.
MR. DORRILL: Deputy director.
MR. COLEMAN: Assistant.
MR. DORRILL: I worked hard to create that position.
MR. COLEMAN: Assistant director or deputy director,
Neil's bodyguard, whatever you want to call it, for Pelican Bay
Services Division, Chad Coleman.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Great. So, basically, we're in
the way. Government's in the way of getting things done?
MR. COLEMAN: No, not necessarily. Like I said, we're
using that contract. We work with CZM. When they renew
that contract, if we can add that piece. As long as we have that
contract in place, we can mobilize, and we can do that work. In,
actually, 2020 we did an in-house project where I just rented
equipment and we did it in-house. That's -- it was COVID time
frame. We couldn't get anybody to do the work, so we made it
Page 144 of 5415
Page 14
March 4, 2025
happen at that time.
But I wouldn't say that the government is in the way. We
have the contracts in place. It's just their availability as well.
So if you're on a tight time frame before sea turtle season, that's
asking a lot, especially when these companies are doing beach
renourishment.
COMMISSIONER HALL: It wasn't that. I was just -- I
was curious as to how long it took. I wasn't wanting it before or
after.
MR. COLEMAN: Yeah. And the only thing that changes
it, if you have an event during the work. We've had that happen,
too, a storm event or anything, because it is very sensitive. And
if you have prevailing winds or a lot of storms, and if you have a
hydraulic dredge in there, it gets a little rocky, and they have to
pull that thing out and restage it.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Gotcha. And then lastly, when
we do dredge, is there a definite positive result for the Seagate
community, or does that result degrade over time?
MR. DORRILL: The entire system will degrade over time,
again, depending on wave heights and prevailing winds.
As soon as we reopen the pass, the difference between low
tide and high tide can be eight-tenths to a foot. That's a lot of
saltwater that will, you know, fan out through the estuary there.
And dilution is a wonderful thing when it comes to water quality,
because the more saltwater you get in, the more it improves the
overall measurable things, whether it's nitrogen, phosphorus,
dissolved oxygen, E. coli, copper. Those are the big four things
that we monitor also on an annual basis and produce
water-quality reports.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Thank you, sir.
Page 145 of 5415
Page 15
March 4, 2025
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner Kowal.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Thank you, Chairman.
Thank you, Chairman.
Good afternoon, Neil. I'm glad you got this picture up
because I had a few questions about it. I know with our chart,
permitting the A, B, and C sections, and in reality in this picture,
it only goes up to where, I think, the one, two -- the third bend,
basically, in that photograph.
Have you ever or at any point do you remember -- because
there's a manmade structure which was down by the park which
is the bridge. That bridge is over the main body of the Outer
Clam Bay portion, which is a large body of water that's a part of
this system.
Even in this picture, you can see -- this is just, what, a
couple weeks ago -- you can see that it looks like a buildup of
sand in front of that manmade structure.
Do you ever get in there and clear that out to help the rise
and fall of the actual tide in the large body of the Outer Clam Bay
Pass?
MR. DORRILL: We do not in the vicinity of the bridge,
and the primary reason for that is -- you can actually see some
areas of dry sand in that picture, and I will tell you that as it
makes the 90-degree turn to the south, that's really the last viable
tidal flat that has seagrass in it. Seagrass is another parameter
that's important to the health of the overall system, so we don't
tend to dredge in there because it is adjacent to what is sort of the
last viable seagrass flat that is there.
We met with the residents of the city several months ago
and made them aware that we were going to do a bathymetric
survey and that we were going to extend the survey south of
Page 146 of 5415
Page 16
March 4, 2025
Section C all the way to, essentially, where the sea kayak
launching area is. And we just got the results of that, and they
show that, honestly, there has been little change in shoaling or the
areas of elevation south of there. I can have Dr. Dabees speak to
that. I don't even know if we've shared the results with Seagate
and Naples Cay yet, but we had the entire system bathymetrically
surveyed --
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: South of the bridge?
MR. DORRILL: Yes, sir. All the way down to where the
resident sea kayak launching area is there adjacent to your
parking lot.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: So that elevation south of
the bridge has not changed?
MR. DORRILL: No.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: But let's say the level of
water passing before the bridge, has that changed? Depth of
water, I guess.
MR. DORRILL: We have both the last entire survey and
the one that was just done in --
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Mr. Dorrill, if you could use
the microphone, that will --
MR. DORRILL: Yeah, sorry. We have both the last entire
survey of the system and also have just received the analysis of
the new entire bathymetric survey that was done in December.
DR. DABEES: For the record, Mohammed Dabees, project
engineer. I'm vice president of Humiston & Moore Engineers.
The section between where we end the dredging in Section
C or around the bend was only dredged once when the first
management plan was implemented. So the dredging extended
from Clam Pass all the way, which was Cut 4 to Outer Clam Bay,
Page 147 of 5415
Page 17
March 4, 2025
and then we had three cuts between inner and upper bay in 1999.
Those sections were made primarily to make sure that we have
adequate flushing throughout the mangrove forest. And from
the monitoring the years after, the area of dynamics and main
changes were limited, as Neil indicated, to the mouth of the inlet
in Section B and to some extent Section C.
When -- and also when we modified the permit in 2014, we
had to kind of reduce Section C by 50 feet to accommodate
buffers to viable seagrass habitat which is a protected resource.
So the -- as far as -- the current survey that we completed
indicates that we don't have significant or measurable change
over the past seven years from the last time we surveyed Outer
Clam Bay. The survey is basically showing, for the most part,
everything is stable, and I have the results in -- if the discussion
would necessitate that we look over them.
But there are areas where the shoals shift. And as far as
flow, while -- that shift might be critical to just how the shape or
size of a shoal is, but it is not as far as flow, because the flow
kind of meanders around the shoals. So what we look at in our
assessment is through any critical section, what's the
cross-sectional area of flow? And if we find restrictions, that's
when we recommend intervention.
And lastly, as Neil indicated, this system has, I would say,
an unparallel system of monitoring that does not really exist in
any inlet that I've worked on, and I've worked on almost all the
inlets of Southwest and Central Florida, because we have real-
time monitoring. We look at the tide ratios almost on a daily
basis at our end, and we report it to the -- to Pelican Bay Service
District once -- Division, sorry -- once a month. And when we
see deficiencies or critical nature of the flow, we take action in
Page 148 of 5415
Page 18
March 4, 2025
additional physical monitoring and then recommendations for
dredging.
So we have an early sensing system, and we also have
physical monitoring that is done at six months to one year to
allow us to make sure that the system remains functional.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: You agree with Neil that the
best way for a healthy bay is the natural flow and inflow of
natural saltwater from the gulf into it during a normal tide cycle?
Do you agree with him on that?
DR. DABEES: Yes. That's the main premise of the
management plan is that we need to maintain the flow that is
necessary to, number one, provide the vital needs for the
environmental system because it is an NRPA, or a natural
protected system, and its main directive or objective is the
ecology of the system. We have a comprehensive monitoring
system that monitors the -- all the environmental resources --
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: So you -- out of everything
you've been saying, so basically you're saying that the people that
live adjacent to Outer Clam Bay, the people that live right on it,
within feet of it, like the city residents to the south, they shouldn't
have noticed any change in the bay according to what you're
monitoring and saying, that -- you haven't noticed anything that's
changed over this last several decades or few decades?
DR. DABEES: No. I'm not saying that. What I'm saying
is when we dredge --
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Okay. So there is a
problem, then?
DR. DABEES: There are problems throughout the system
when you have the intensity of storms that we get.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Okay.
Page 149 of 5415
Page 19
March 4, 2025
DR. DABEES: And the --
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: But that's on us human
beings to work that out and fix it, correct?
DR. DABEES: To the extent that we can, because there
are -- every system has an --
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Have you guys ever applied
for a navigational dredging permit?
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner Kowal, if you
would, just to help me out a little bit, he's in the middle of
answering that question. I'd like to --
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: He was talking a lot, and I
was just trying to get to where -- the easy simple parts of it.
Either the bay's healthy or not, and do we have a way to fix it.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Yeah. I was -- I just wanted
to hear the answer to his -- you've asked some great questions.
I'd just like maybe to hear his full answers.
DR. DABEES: So every system equilibrates to the balance
of the forces that are making it. So if you dig a deep hole that
doesn't current to keep it open, it will shoal right away. And the
more you dig, the faster it will fill in.
So by that token, if we dredge Clam Pass bigger and wider
and deeper, it would be to the detriment of the system. We have
to dredge it to what balances with the volume of water that can
go in and out of the system.
And even right after we dredge, it can never stay the way we
just dredged it, because by nature, when you have a backwater
and an open water with an inlet connecting it, you have to have
the formation of flood shoals, which is on the landward side of
the inlet, and ebb shoals on the seaward of the system. When
you first dredge it, as Neil indicated, you will have almost
Page 150 of 5415
Page 20
March 4, 2025
synonymous tide range inside as much as in the gulf, but that is
not sustainable because it's going to start to reach that
equilibrium, and we monitor that equilibrium. And once we
audit the critical threshold, we continue to monitor it, and when it
crosses it, that's when we recommend dredging.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: But, once again, you're an
engineer, so you understand the concept of volume --
DR. DABEES: Yes.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: -- right?
So the largest volume of this whole system is the outer
bay --
DR. DABEES: Yes.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: -- right?
So we have the most narrow area just to the north of the
large part of the bay which is the manmade structure, which is the
bridge. And all I'm saying is the dredging always ends at that
third bend. We never really go down and see how much
restrictions, how much actual flow to give the volume, the largest
volume the ability to rise and fall naturally. And I mean, is there
a way to fix that? I guess that's all I'm asking.
DR. DABEES: So I can tell you that we have two gauges,
one by Section C and one inside Outer Clam Bay, and we
measure the flow. And when we measure the flow in these two,
they are almost the exact same. It diminishes between the gulf
and the one in Section C because most of the shoaling is in that
section. But between Marker 14 and Marker 4, these two are
almost synonymous, and we monitor that on daily and monthly
and yearly basis.
If we see deficiency between 4 in Outer Clam Bay and 14,
that means there is a clog in between, and there is none. Even
Page 151 of 5415
Page 21
March 4, 2025
the consultant that Seagate commissioned acknowledged that fact
that we do not have flow deficiency in that section as far as flow.
Because what I'm saying is you could see a shoal, but the water
finds its way around that shoal. And I look at the entire
cross-sectional area, and if it's reduced, then that is critical, but if
it's just shifted from here to there and it's still the same
cross-sectional area, the same amount of flow is getting through.
MR. DORRILL: Let's see if there are any questions.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Are you telling me I'm
done?
MR. DORRILL: No. I said see if you had other questions.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Oh, I'm sorry. Yeah, I had
one, but Commissioner Saunders had told me not to ask it yet.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: No, no, no. I just --
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: I'm going to ask it again.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Yeah, go ahead. No, all I'm
suggesting -- all I was suggesting is that you were asking great
questions, but he wasn't able to complete his answer. And I was
just asking to let him do that because it was interesting.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: I had asked one, but he
never got back to it, but I want to ask it again.
Have you ever applied for a navigational dredging permit?
DR. DABEES: The -- to my understanding, during the 25
years that I've been working on Clam Pass, navigation is not one
of the objectives of Clam Pass.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Is it -- because I know you
guys have -- well, it's a natural body of water.
DR. DABEES: There are many natural bodies of water
throughout the state that are maintained for hydraulic efficiency
and health of the system and are not navigational connections,
Page 152 of 5415
Page 22
March 4, 2025
and if people navigate through them, it's at their own risk. But
there is also the declaration or the fact that this is declared a
NRPA, which means the priority is to the health of the system.
When you have a navigation inlet, especially commercial
navigation inlets, those become more of a public interest at a
level that requires -- that allows for environmental impacts.
In this case, it's the other way around. It's an environmental
protected system that the priorities should be to the health of the
mangrove and the ecosystem. And from the environmental
studies that were done in 1999 and then in 2014 and then current
monitoring, we -- as engineering and as physical change, we
follow the lead of the environmental needs, and then we work
with the community on the recreational benefits that can be
accommodated within the ecosystem, similar to if it's a national
park or any protected body of water. You just have to allow
recreational benefits that does not cause detrimental impacts to
the system.
And as Neil indicated that path, that section between end of
Section C to the bridge, the shoulders of that natural channel is
where all the documented seagrasses in the system have been,
and the shoal that you see from the bridge is actually the place
where we have the most observable seagrasses to date.
So it is just -- even if we want to and we go to the agencies,
they will say, "Thou shall not impact one blade of seagrasses,"
and that is a very high burden to clear with the environmental
agencies.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: So, I mean, long story
short -- because the way it's categorized and the way it has been
for several decades of the ecological side of it, that you wouldn't
be able to get a navigational permit through that section anyways,
Page 153 of 5415
Page 23
March 4, 2025
right? I mean, is that the answer? I'm just --
MR. DORRILL: Over the course of 25 years, there was
one attempt to conduct what I would -- to your point, would have
been a navigational project with navigational markers similar to
intercoastal type markers for boating --
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: I'm leaning more towards --
MR. DORRILL: -- that was not approved.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: -- figuring out a way to get
permitting more to help the water flow in and out. I was not so
much saying to navigate, but in reality navigational permits
sometimes are easier than getting the other permits. I was just
asking if that's a possibility, and from your answer it sounds like
it's not because of that seagrass section south of C. Does that
sound right?
DR. DABEES: And the nee -- since the flow doesn't show
that there is a deficiency in flow between the back section of the
Clam Pass and Outer Clam Bay. I would say most of the
deficiency in the flow is in the upper bays. Most of our
mangrove die-off’s are in the upper bays, other than storm
impacts. Because Outer Clam Bay has very robust tidal flow
that is made possible by us maintaining Clam Pass.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: So my last question: Do
you think since, let's say, Ian -- because we've probably -- this is
probably the most active surge storm seasons we've had the past
several years, because we've been putting a lot more manmade
sand in these areas, do you think that's hampering some of this or
exacerbating or speeding up the process of this sand flowing back
in? Because typically we're not putting that much loose silica
sand around the mouth of this thing, you know, over the years
because now all of a sudden we've had several events that we've
Page 154 of 5415
Page 24
March 4, 2025
had to add a lot more sand that's probably not fixed well to the
ground to begin with. So it does flow a lot easier, almost like
silt, in and out of the bay. Do you think that may have been
adding to why we're seeing maybe a little bit more recently than
in the past?
DR. DABEES: Hurricane Ian and the storms that followed
Hurricane Ian have impacted the entire coastline from Marco
Island to Clearwater in Pinellas County, and none is more than
what you see in that picture if you see the extent of the sand
intrusion into the vegetation. So our most impact is actually we
lost a fringe of mangroves that could be 50- to 100-foot wide
throughout the system from the sand intrusion from the coastal
side.
In the interior side -- and as Neil indicated, we just
completed a survey of Outer Clam Bay, and that survey shows no
significant change with the exception of very small migration of
shoals between the -- this current 2025 survey and 2017 survey.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: I guess what I'm trying to
say is hopefully we don't get hit with some more storms here over
the next decade like that and that it should start correcting itself
because we'll get ahead of it with the last dredging project I think
you just completed. Hopefully we'll see some change in the
outer bay pass -- or outer bay.
DR. DABEES: Yeah.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: All right. Thank you.
Thank you, guys.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner LoCastro.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Neil, I just had one
question. When you were going through your presentation, did I
hear you right where you said when we're moving around the
Page 155 of 5415
Page 25
March 4, 2025
sand and doing dredging your quote -- and it was mixed in with,
you know, your presentation -- was sometimes we run out of
places to put the excessive sand that we have; is that -- is that a
case?
MR. DORRILL: That's why we amended the permit to
extend the fill templates for that sand.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Okay. I mean -- and this
is just me thinking out loud. I mean, I work very closely with
Andy in Coastal Zone Management, and in my district we're
buying sand. You know, we have places that were totally
eroded; Cape Marco and lots of other places that even the
doctor's aware of, and he's educated me, and groups of people
saying, hey, sometimes, you know, moving sand from Point A to
Point B -- you know, the terminology I always say is the juice
isn't worth the squeeze, you know, by the time you or -- or the
sand isn't of the quality, you know. It has different things in it.
But I just wanted to confirm, do we have good sand that
we're dumping in places or we're getting rid of that we could be
recycling and using in other places that would make sense? And
maybe it's for the doc. Maybe it's for you. Andy's sitting in the
back. I just know that we're buying a lot of sand and trucking a
lot of it into my district. You know, when I just caught that little
phrase of, "Wow, sometimes we're running out of places to put
it," it's like, well, we might want to put it somewhere else, if it's
feasible. Sometimes it doesn't make sense.
MR. DORRILL: It's a good -- it's a good problem to have.
On the level of magnitude, it's probably less than a thousand
cubic yards --
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Oh, okay.
MR. DORRILL: -- which in Andy's world is nothing.
Page 156 of 5415
Page 26
March 4, 2025
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Nothing. Yeah. Okay.
That's -- I just wanted to get that clear. Thank you, sir.
DR. DABEES: I'll just add to that clarification --
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: You need to get on the
microphone.
DR. DABEES: -- what we did is that we run out of space
in the permitted templated.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: I gotcha.
DR. DABEES: So we expanded the template to kind of
supplement areas where truck haul is the main source. So it's
actually -- the area where we expanded it, adding dune and berm
in areas that typically would get sand through truck hauls.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Got it. Makes sense.
Thank you.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Okay. I'm, again, going to
urge the speakers to get closer to the microphone so everyone can
hear.
Commissioner McDaniel.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yes, sir. Good morning.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Good morning.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: And I want to blame
those two nice people there for my tardiness this morning. They
were in the way for me to get in the parking lot, and that's the
reason I was late. It didn't have anything to do with us not
building any roads.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: I want to thank both of them
for trying to block his entry.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: You followed our
direction perfectly.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: I wish you more success next
Page 157 of 5415
Page 27
March 4, 2025
time.
Commissioner McDaniel.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Thank you. Thank you,
Commissioner.
Mr. Dorrill, would you go to a previous map that you
showed where -- upper, lower, middle Clam Bay was on
your -- on your -- oh, you've got to get your lady to help you with
the buttons. Okay. That one right there.
MR. DORRILL: Upper, inner, and outer.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Sir?
MR. DORRILL: Upper, inner, and outer north to south.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Upper, inner, and outer.
Are we still -- because I notice all of our maps in the
pictures that I'm seeing have the upper portion cut off. Are we
still experiencing loss of mangroves in that upper?
MR. DORRILL: I think that we have experienced a lot of
regrowth. And, Jeremy, if you don't mind -- because he's just
submitted the annual report. Jeremy Sterk is the one who not
only does the monitoring, but their crews are the ones that are
maintaining those hand-dug channels there. He can speak
maybe a little more in terms of the acreage and things of that
nature.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Okay.
MR. STERK: Sure. For the record, Jeremy Sterk,
EarthTech Environmental.
Yeah. We've been monitoring the mangroves since about
2015, my company. And, you know, obviously, with the storms
that we've seen since Ian and Irma to begin with, and Ian, there's
been a lot of impacts to the mangrove system, external impacts.
The majority of the stress to mangroves that we've had have been
Page 158 of 5415
Page 28
March 4, 2025
in the north of the system.
Generally, they're recovering. You know, we usually see
immediately after a storm like Irma or Ian there's -- the first
monitoring event is about six months later. We typically see a
decline in the scoring that we give the mangroves. And then
usually at about the year point we see a rebound. And that's
even what we've seen even after the storms last year.
We're seeing the mangroves recover. Now, that's not to say
that they don't have a long way to go, but they're very resilient.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Thank you. Thank you.
I'm not done by any stretch, Mr. Chair.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Oh.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I'm not done by any
stretch. That was my lead-in question to get to where -- to get to
where I'm going next.
MR. DORRILL: There was an area in Bay Colony adjacent
to what is known -- the dune swale, which is a natural drainage
feature. Hurricane Ian overwashed the dune, and as Mohamed
said, that sand has pushed inland by about 150 feet. Some of the
mangroves that are in the dune swale area are now under six to
eight feet of sand and are expected to die.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: You can -- you can see
just from this picture to the last picture that you had up that that
100- to 150-foot swath has destroyed those mangroves inside,
almost like a little barrier of mangroves, and then there's a swath
in there where the sand got pushed up.
And the reality of this is, this entire system is behind at all.
The entire system has silted in. I mean, you actually alleged that
some of the channels in the -- in the upper Clam Bay have to be
hand dug, my goodness. And we also know that this is a very
Page 159 of 5415
Page 29
March 4, 2025
complex subject. I mean, there are archaeological sites, as
you've already mentioned early on. I don't know -- and I haven't
seen a picture as to necessarily where they are, but it's really not a
part of this discussion. Relatively speaking we have -- we have
short-term circumstances, and that's the renewal of the existing
permit, the modification of where we can then, in fact, disperse;
and then we have a long-term issue with how we're doing and
what we're doing and what we have been doing for 25 years-plus.
I have lived here, Mr. Dorrill, almost as long as you, and I
recall when the folks that lived in Seagate had deepwater access.
There was navigability out of Seagate. I think -- I'm not an
expert, but I think that seagrass -- thou shalt not destroy seagrass
has to have certain elevations of sand underneath it so that it has
proper sunlight for it to, in fact, grow.
And so when the -- when the -- when continuous dredging
isn't effectuated, seagrass develops, and so therefore, then, thou
shalt not destroy the seagrass. And so then an additional
bureaucratic restriction comes online that then, in turn, impacts
the entire health of the system with regard to the necessary flush
so that we have good mangrove growth all the way through the
system.
If we don't have proper flush with the normal tidal
flows -- storms are going to come and go. We all know that.
We became very -- Collier County became very apathetic to
storm and surge associated with the storms because the last surge
event we had was 1960, before you were born. Pretty close.
And so we really didn't have any kind of a surge event that
actually transpired.
And then what we ultimately learned, even in advance of
Ian, which was the largest storm surge event that our community
Page 160 of 5415
Page 30
March 4, 2025
had, we had a converse impact with Irma with 30-plus inches of
rainfall that happened on the inland side and, conversely, we
couldn't get the freshwater off our people from the outside.
And so back to Commissioner Kowal's discussion with
regard to the dredging that's, in fact, necessary. I would like for
us to holistically view the whole system for, ultimately, to get to
the -- and, again, it's going to come and go. You know the
minute you dredge -- I'm a dredger. But the minute you dredge,
it begins to silt back in.
Over time, that natural flush that comes every 12 hours with
our tidal flows will allow for the health of the entire system to
be -- to be ultimately main [sic]
, have the necessary saltwater flush that the mangroves, in
fact, need in order to survive and be healthy, and have the whole
system work for the betterment of the environment at the same
time.
My -- I guess my question, it comes back around to, have we
done any exploration with regard to the history and the silting of
the Outer Clam Bay? Because if I'm not mistaken, there are
culverts that go underneath Seagate Drive that allow for
additional flush, theoretically, in and out of the northern end of
Venetian Bay. Am I correct with that?
MR. DORRILL: Correct.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: If I remember that.
So I think the -- this is just me looking at the entire system
for quite some time. I think that we have to take -- certainly take
care of the short-term circumstances with the expiration of the
upcoming permit and its modification so we have a place to put
the sand, but I think a longer, more holistic plan needs to be
developed for the entire system. What we have been doing,
Page 161 of 5415
Page 31
March 4, 2025
personally -- and I've been watching it for eight years as a
commissioner. I've been watching it for 40 years -- 44 years that
I've lived in Collier County. We -- that entire system
has -- hasn't been managed properly. There has been a struggle
between recreational uses, and people that kayak don't want the
motorboats, and the people that have motorboats don't want the
kayaks, and then -- and by the way, the compliment is the
positive impact that the foundation has had with human runoff. I
mean, you folks have done an amazing job to clean the
freshwater that inevitably ends up in this estuary.
But I think we really need to work towards a holistic
approach on the long-term process with regard to the entire
system.
MR. DORRILL: The first thing that you said -- and the $10
word for that is eutrophication. And over time, wetland systems
will become eutrophic, meaning that, you know, sediment comes
in, and as a result of that, the types of vegetation that it can
sustain evolve over time, as systems become eutrophic. And so I
hear you. And I think that's some of what we are experiencing
and attempting to manage in upper reaches of the system by
maintaining those hand-dug channels in order to get the
freshwater out of there and away from the important, you know,
roots of the mangroves.
But the other element -- and there needs to be, perhaps,
some discussion at some point. The Naples Cay and Seagate
communities are not in our taxing district, and they are not in the
Natural Resource Protection Area. My understanding is that
those canals have a large amount of sediment in them. Water
quality is an issue there. I don't believe that there's been any
maintenance of those canals or anything taken into context with
Page 162 of 5415
Page 32
March 4, 2025
work that we're doing to the north of there.
And so I mean, if we're going to look at the entire
system -- and I think they're going to share more about their
feelings and plans and desires in just a few minutes.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I'm sure that they will.
But there again, that needs to be encompassed in the entire
system study, the water quality that's coming out of the southern
end that's outside of the NRPA as well as what you folks have
going on within the -- within the NRPA area.
MR. DORRILL: And I will also submit to you that the
water quality in the north end of Park Shore, in Doctors Bay, is
overall worse because of the urban environment that it is within
than the natural system that is the -- the protection area.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I would concur with that
statement as well, sir.
DR. DABEES: And if we can add to this.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Excuse me. Excuse me.
Hang on just a second. If you're going to speak, that's fine, but
I'm going to insist that you use the microphone.
DR. DABEES: Yeah. In adding to this, the system in
Moorings Bay and Doctors Pass have almost synonymous tide
fluctuation because it's maintained and jettied. So the flushing is
not the only answer to water quality.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I don't disagree with that
either.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner McDaniel, are
you finished now or --
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Relatively speaking, yes,
sir.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: I just have one or two quick
Page 163 of 5415
Page 33
March 4, 2025
questions, then we'll get back to Commissioner Hall.
In terms of the outer bay, from all of the diagrams and
everything you've said, it sounds like the health of the mangroves
has been pretty consistently good. But I want to hear on the
record, what is the condition of the mangroves in the Outer Clam
Bay as well as Inner Clam Bay? Are there areas where it's
becoming degraded? What's the condition of those?
MR. DORRILL: There are some new areas that are in your
park that are showing stress from high-resolution aerial
photography, and we intend to have that monitored as part of this
year's -- this fiscal year's cycle. We committed to that when we
met with the Seagate. It's sort of midway in the park on the east
side, obviously, in the mangrove there. There are some new
mangrove areas that are stressed at the regional park.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Okay. And at this point you
don't know what's causing that stress, but you're going to evaluate
that?
MR. DORRILL: Yes. I presume that it is the same, and
they don't have the hand-dug channels that were engineered to
help drain that area the way that they were in the north. There's
some, but there's not a lot.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: How big an area is that?
MR. DORRILL: Acreage wise?
Maybe two acres, but it's new.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Okay. Commissioner Hall.
COMMISSIONER HALL: So I've just got a question. I
am more familiar with handling and managing water in a terrace
in a cotton field than I am this. So I'm just going to throw
something out. I just want to know if there's a possibility or if
there's a no possibility or if it's taboo. But on this map, the one
Page 164 of 5415
Page 34
March 4, 2025
that you handed us, there's a little inlet in that -- in the Clam Bay
that gets towards -- there's a little skinny spot of mangroves. So
my thought was, what would happen if you open that and
allowed, like, another inlet?
MR. DORRILL: It would -- short answer, there would be
less water to go out the main inlet that would accelerate the
shoaling and the types of performance concerns that we're
concerned about. It's a good question, though.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Okay. Troy, do we have
some registered speakers?
MR. MILLER: We do, sir. We have seven registered --
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Oh, I'm sorry. Commissioner
McDaniel, you had something else before we get to the speakers?
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I just have one statement,
and the statement it similar to what Commissioner Kowal said.
Width, breadth, and depth creates volume. Remember that as
you're going forward. Creation of volume within the entire
system will help the entire system both north, south, east, and
west.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: All right. For our speakers, if
you were -- we limit our speakers to three minutes. We'll be a
little bit flexible, if you've got some technical data, and I would
ask that you not be repetitive.
Troy.
MR. MILLER: Yeah. Mr. Chair, we traditionally do
in-room speakers first, but the group from Clam Bay have asked
that we let their member on Zoom go first --
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Sure.
MR. MILLER: -- as he wants to lead off.
Patrick Wack. Patrick, you're being prompted to unmute
Page 165 of 5415
Page 35
March 4, 2025
yourself, if you'll do so at this time. There you go. Patrick, you
have three minutes, sir.
MR. WACK: I'll be less than that. Thanks for your time.
Patrick Wack, president of the Seagate Association in Naples.
I'm joined by many members of our community at Naples Cay.
As you know, Clam Bay is our backyard, and thank you for
organizing this. It's also a valuable county resource.
I think to us the fundamental issue is our communities have
no representation with regard to the water quality, ecological
health of the dredging of the bay. You all know what happened
in 2016. Essentially, control was given to Pelican Bay. We're
having this meeting because we've been very frustrated along a
lot of the elements of it and feeling like we're not being heard.
In addition, as you know, most of the activities are
reimbursed by the county. I guess the only analogy is we're like
farmers down the stream where somebody else controls the water
flow. We're concerned with the water quality, which is
impaired, the declining ecological health. In fact, the latest
environmental report showed basically no seagrass in the
management of these issues.
In fact, a Pelican Bay Services Division board member
described the latest environmental report is sobering. As you
know, we spent our own money to start an alternative
engineering analysis. We'll have another speaker which will get
into some of these suggestions. You know, I'm not going to
repeat this too much, but we all know the bay is shallow.
And, you know in 2022, when, during a dredging operation,
there was an unauthorized land bridge, our water flow was shut
off for six weeks, and very detrimental.
Listen, our goal today is not to, you know, suggest overly
Page 166 of 5415
Page 36
March 4, 2025
specific environmental solutions. You know, it's very
complicated. There's mangrove maintenance, dredging, dune
restoration, the use of fertilizers, reclaimed irrigation water that
all require, I think, per Commissioner McDaniel's comment, a
fresh look.
And we feel this so strongly this look requires the equal
representation for all stakeholders including, to some degree, the
county. Therefore, we ask the following: That there's the
creation of a Clam Bay advisory committee to oversee and advise
the county on all issues related to the bay's water quality,
ecological health, and dredging. We just believe this is fair. It
brings more brain power to this complex problem in the hopes of
finding a solution to this, you know, treasured piece of the real
estate, and, you know, our backyard. So we just feel very
strongly that almost more than anything that's the fundamental
issue here.
So thank you for your time.
MR. MILLER: Your next speaker is Katherine
Cunningham. She'll be followed by Susan DeVoe.
MS. CUNNINGHAM: Good morning. Thank you for
your time and attention to this issue.
I just wanted to pick up on Patrick's description of this as
our backyard. It's literally our backyard. We bought our home
in Seagate 14 years ago. We've lived there most of that time.
We did lose our home in Hurricane Ian, so we've been out of our
house for the past two and a half years. And, quite honestly, we
can't wait to come back, and the reason that we can't wait to come
back is this is a beautiful place. This backyard, this
environmentally protected area is absolutely beautiful, and we
can't wait to come back. We're in the middle of rebuilding our
Page 167 of 5415
Page 37
March 4, 2025
home. We hope it will be finished this year.
We have a long -- we have a long time span living here.
We're full-time residents. We're really looking forward to
having this be our backyard.
I think all of us really think that the most important part is
protecting the health and the well-being of this environmental
system. We do also use the bay. We use it in all kinds of
different ways. When we first bought our home 14 years ago,
we had a kayak, and we had a small Boston Whaler. We've
since -- long since sold the Whaler, sold the kayak. We picked
up a small fishing boat from a neighbor who gave us this little
plastic boat that our kids learned to drive when they were little;
5-horsepower motor. We've also had Sea-Doos. We currently
have a couple of paddleboards, and we have a 23-foot Panga
motorboat.
So we use the bay in all of these ways, and we don't see it as
a fight between the use for navigation and the environment. We
think all of these uses are important. We want to -- we all love
the bay. I think our neighbors in Pelican Bay love this bay as
well. I've got family members, friends, clients. My office is in
Pelican Bay. I think we all have an interest in protecting it and
making it better in the future.
So thank you. Thank you for your attention.
MR. MILLER: Your next speaker is Susan DeVoe. She'll
be followed by JoAnn Jany.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Hang on. Ms. Cunningham,
we have -- a commissioner has a question.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Ma'am, can I just ask you
a quick question? I've only talked to a few people -- more than a
few, but I've got you right in front of me here. You say, you
Page 168 of 5415
Page 38
March 4, 2025
know, you lost your house in Ian, and you're rebuilding it. Just
out of my own curiosity and education, what changes did you
make to your new house, you know, compared to the damage?
Because, you know, some people aren't making many
changes, and it's like, okay, this is going to happen again. But I
have a feeling you probably didn't do that. I can tell just by your
presentation.
Just give me the short version, and it's more for my own,
you know, education as to, you know, people that got hit hard
and then had to totally rebuild like you did.
What's different? I mean, was your house totally gone or
you had a little bit of the structure left and now you've, you
know, been sort of, you know, rebuilding what was left?
MS. CUNNINGHAM: We had nearly five feet of water in
our home.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Okay.
MS. CUNNINGHAM: It was an original 1969 ranch
house. It was about 2,800 square feet. It was basically
destroyed. The structure was still there. My husband and I did
have a conversation about whether we could save it. We
decided not to do that because of the risk it would happen again.
So the number-one change we made, you could probably guess.
We elevated it.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Elevation.
MS. CUNNINGHAM: So it used to be about six feet
above sea level. It's now 14 feet above sea level.
One issue that we did run into is in trying to elevate the
garage. There are limits in how much you can elevate the
garage, and we were able to elevate a couple of feet. It would be
helpful if we could elevate more.
Page 169 of 5415
Page 39
March 4, 2025
With the home, quite honestly, we would have gone higher
than 14 feet, but we hit the ceiling. So that -- yeah, we did. We
built it as high as we could and, quite honestly, it seems to me it
would be nice if we could go higher.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Any big insurance
nightmares, FEMA, anything, you know, short version, just to get
it directly from --
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Let's move on. Let's move
on.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: I'd like to hear her
answer.
MS. CUNNINGHAM: Well, I'd love to very quickly
answer this. Lori Bessano (phonetic) is the best insurance agent
in the world, and she is great. We are -- our claim was filed
while the storm was happening. We got full value on our claim
without any fight or hassle. That said, it's about 10 percent of
what we needed to rebuild.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Okay.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Can we move on now,
Commissioner?
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Yeah. Thank you,
ma'am.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Let's move on to the topic.
MR. MILLER: Your next speaker is Suzanne DeVoe.
She'll be followed by JoAnn Jany.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: It's part of the topic.
MS. DeVOE: All right. Hi. I'm Susan DeVoe. I'm a
Seagate board member. We've already discussed, for a small
inlet, it's important to have optimal dredging to promote the
flushing. Even small improvements can make a big difference.
Page 170 of 5415
Page 40
March 4, 2025
On average, the current dredging only achieved 60 percent
of the theoretical maximal flow. Other approaches might
increase this. To evaluate this, we spent a significant sum of our
own money on independent analysis. We hired Taylor
Engineering to examine historical data and meet with Pelican
Bay's engineer. As a result, they're making three
recommendations. So Taylor is making three recommendations:
That there should be a planned annual dredge before turtle
nesting season, which is May 1st. The current scheme has a
variable time frame of 12 to 24 months, and it's more reactive,
and it often runs into delays, as we are experiencing now.
Delays increase the risk of closure and have resulted in
unnecessary periods of reduced flow.
The dredge should be consistent throughout the entire
allowable area. Recently it's been limited to about 50 percent or
less of the inlet.
And number three, there should be a computer modeling of
the alternate dredging configurations. This is very standard and,
to our knowledge, has never been done. This would cost
approximately $75,000. Our goal would be to find a plan to
allow more tidal flow.
For sure there are complexities with each of these items
which go beyond the scope of this meeting; however, for the
health of the system, we believe that our suggestions should
and -- should be thoroughly and independently evaluated in
parallel with the March 2026 permit renewal.
So we've been able to be involved in several of the Pelican
Bay Services Division meetings. We brought this up several
times, and it -- it feels like everything runs in slow motion.
So it was brought up last, I think it was last November, that
Page 171 of 5415
Page 41
March 4, 2025
we were exploring the dredge, and then it was put off and put off
and put off, and now we are into turtle nesting season. So now
it's going to be in November.
My concern is in waiting for this kind of behemoth process
to keep moving forward, mangroves have suffered and are dying,
as several of us discussed, and I think that -- I think it was -- was
it you, Mr. Saunders, that brought up -- or Mr. Hall that brought
up what would happen if we just let them all die, and there would
be a breach there.
You know, half of me says, "Great, let's do it," because then
I've got, you know, gulf property. But it's not the right thing to
do, because as we all know that -- I think the number one thing is
the mangrove health in that they're carbon eaters and that they're
also the infrastructure in keeping the sand where it's supposed to
be and also a habitat for young wildlife.
And that's all I have to say today.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Thank you.
MR. MILLER: Your next speaker is JoAnn Jany. She'll
be followed by Scott Schultz.
MS. JANY: Good morning. I'm JoAnn Jany from Naples
Cay.
As a Florida Master Naturalist and a volunteer for Collier
County Parks and Recreation, I spend almost every day in Clam
Pass Park. In addition to our community's lack of say in matters
relative to my backyard, I'm very concerned about the
well-documented water quality and ecological issues. Although,
unfortunately, the water quality of many estuaries in Southwest
Florida are considered impaired, I do not believe that's the reason
to continue with business as usual.
Furthermore, since 2016, the mangrove and seagrass health
Page 172 of 5415
Page 42
March 4, 2025
in the park has declined, even before the recent hurricanes.
The slow degradation of the system has many causes, some
natural and others manmade; however, we believe that there
needs to be more attention on two aspects. First, controlling
excessive nutrient levels entering the system and, two, inadequate
flushing of the bay.
The former is partially related to the county's use of
reclaimed water for irrigation. For example, Pelican Bay's
nutrient levels are multiple times that of Clam Bay. Inadequate
flushing is partially due to suboptimal dredging processes. Our
engineers have made some recommendations with regard to the
dredging.
There are additional environmental issues. For example,
there's a strip of hurricane-damaged mangroves that in all of
Collier County was targeted by the U.S. Army Corps as an area
of restoration. If that breaches, the park will become an island,
and my fellow homeowners in Naples Cay may be at risk.
With the Army Corps study on hold, we've been told that the
county and PBSD have a joint responsibility for this damaged
area, yet when I inquire about getting plants or dune plantings
there to help protect the area, the county -- even the county
repetitively don't seem clear about who has responsibility for this.
Second example, there are large areas of dying mangroves
with standing water that have been trapped in there since
Hurricane Ian. I brought this to the attention of the PBSD
environmental consultants for the bay and the attention of the
PBSD water committee at several meetings last year and the year
before. It was finally noted in the last monitoring report as
issued a few weeks ago.
These mangroves will not likely come back even if the
Page 173 of 5415
Page 43
March 4, 2025
channels are dug out now. It's a fragile system, and it needs
more urgent care and response.
I do realize that over 500 acres of mangrove areas under the
NRPA that -- the PBSD has responsibility for. That's a lot to
deal with. But there is only one small area south of Clam Pass
inlet on their list of mangrove areas that they regularly monitor,
and if it isn't on their radar, it's never going to make it to our
mediation list.
Maybe the PBSD needs more funding to do the hard work
that needs to be done to protect this fragile area, but something
needs to happen much sooner than waiting years to address the
issues; otherwise, the cost of restoration will be even more
significant as areas continue to deteriorate.
In addition to a fundamental issue of fairness, I believe our
representation -- a broader representation for our surrounding
communities, including perhaps an independent environmental
consultant, will produce a better result for the health of this
estuary. Thank you.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Thank you.
MR. MILLER: Your next speaker is Scott Schultz. He'll
be followed by John Cross.
MR. SCHULTZ: Hello, there. I'm Scott Schultz, 60
Seagate Drive in Naples Cay. I live in Baypointe, specifically
the building there. I'm also the chairman of your Collier County
Coastal Storm Risk Management Ad Hoc Advisory Committee.
And we're sitting on the ice cube now nice and cold and waiting
for the Army to come back with more funds.
So I'm somewhat familiar with this. I got to meet
Mr. Wack, Patrick Wack, in my endeavors as chairman. As I
went to meet with 14 of the 18 HOAs throughout Naples and
Page 174 of 5415
Page 44
March 4, 2025
found him to be the most -- one of the most earnest folks that I
have dealt with.
I am concerned again, though, with the issues that are
coming back. My activities in this project began with the first
Army Corps project, which people wanted slough gates and walls
and all sorts of good stuff. And, you know, I hear about building
concrete on the beaches. It sort of scares the daylights out of
me.
But nonetheless, some folks believe that fortification of a
place is possible.
Mr. -- Commissioner LoCastro, forts. I think you know a
little bit about those. You can't fortify against a storm. I don't
believe it's really possible to do that.
Hurricane Ian -- I was in the building when that hurricane
hit, and we got more stuff up from the drains, from Clam Bay,
and from the canals that hit our building. We didn't get blasted
from the ocean. We get blasted from the side, from underneath,
and from behind. That's never been remedied, and I'm sure that
those pipes haven't been dredged. That all came up and was all
sort of human effluent in there, so it's quite a mess.
But nonetheless, the ability to put sand back on the beach
over concrete and run it at length, it just doesn't make a whole lot
of sense to me. I know folks are scared and folks need
protection. But concrete on the beach is something I just -- don't
make any sense, in my judgment. But if there is a plan to move
forward with Clam Pass and Clay Bay with being some -- a
volunteer committee, given the experience I've had the last two
and a half years representing you-all, I'd be glad to volunteer to
serve on that committee.
Thank you for your time.
Page 175 of 5415
Page 45
March 4, 2025
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Thank you.
MR. MILLER: Your next speaker is John Cross. He'll be
followed by Sue Black.
MR. CROSS: Hi, thank you. Some of you may know me.
I'm the chair of the Planning Advisory Board, City of Naples.
I just want to reemphasize one point, and that is that the
approach that has been taken is -- with Clam Pass is wait until
there's a problem. Wait until -- wait until we have to dredge,
then go about the process of applying for a permit, and ultimately
dredging, which may -- which takes the better part of a year at
least.
So you have a situation where Clam Bay is threatened,
mangroves are dying. You dredge. Then you wait for Clam
Bay to be threatened. Mangroves are dying. You know, a year
later you dredge. And we should have a higher standard for
maintenance of Clam Bay. We should have -- we should have
a -- there should be an annual dredging, and the criteria should be
health. The criteria should be “maintain the health of Clam
Bay,” not wait until Clam Bay is threatened. Wait until Clam
Bay is in poor condition, and then solve the problem.
That's -- that isn't responsible stewardship of a natural resource.
And that really is the only point I would like to make. Thank
you.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I have a quick -- before
you go, sir.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner McDaniel.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Forgive me, Mr. Chair.
I didn't hit my button while he was --
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Make it a good question.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I'll make it a good
Page 176 of 5415
Page 46
March 4, 2025
question, I promise.
I concur with what you're saying, absolutely. While we're
working on the second portion of what you were discussing,
which is the long-term plan, work with us to ensure the highest
quality of freshwater runoff that's coming out of the northern end
of the City of Naples as is possible, please.
MR. CROSS: Absolutely.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Okay.
MR. CROSS: I mean, I would -- and I should add, you
know, the City of Naples -- I think the number-one financial
priority and municipal priority in the City of Naples is water
quality. The city is spending, I believe, about $200 million on
the stormwater outfalls and on the cleanup of lakes.
The City of Naples is committed to water quality. They
realize that the experience of the outdoors, the experience of the
beach is foundational to the economy of Collier County.
Without it, we're all -- you know, we let this -- if we don't take
care of what we have, we're -- you know, tourism is out the
window. Real estate values are out the window. It's just -- it's
economically -- it's an economic necessity that we care for what
we have.
Thank you very much.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Thank you. Your next
speaker is Sue Black. She'll be followed on Zoom by your final
speaker, Mary McLean Johnson.
MS. BLACK: Good morning. Resident of Seagate for 24
years, and I'm just a common sense kind of girl.
So if you look at this picture that's currently on the display,
you'll see a nice shade of Upper Clam Bay, a nice shade of Inner
Clam Bay, and all of a sudden we see Outer Clam Bay. It's a
Page 177 of 5415
Page 47
March 4, 2025
little bit different. It's green. I'm a visual learner. And also
what I've told my kids through the years is when you want to get
something done, take baby steps. The approach that we're taking
right now, disaster, big step; disaster, big step.
Why don't we have an annual dredge? That way, if a storm
hits, it won't be catastrophic. We will do a dredge -- minor
dredge as opposed to getting these big trucks in there, the
hydraulic. I'm not sure the science about it. But just watching
these machines on the beach, it's just too much for our system.
So ever since the storm, the speaker from --
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Naples Cay.
MS. BLACK: -- Naples Cay, she said that there's a ridge of
sand that flew over on Ian. If you guys go back there, there's a
ledge now of sand, and all those mangroves in front are dying.
So Outer Clam Bay has to be addressed right now.
So I'm -- I'm in support of an annual dredge, taking baby
steps every year, just take on a little bit, take on a little bit, take
on a little bit. That's all I have to say.
Thank you.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Thank you.
MR. MILLER: Your final speaker is Mary McLean
Johnson who is on Zoom. You've been asked to unmute
yourself, Mary, if you'll do so at this time. You're unmuted.
You have three minutes, ma'am.
MS. JOHNSON: Good morning. I am a resident of
Pelican Bay for more than 20 years and also a member of the
Mangrove Action Group, which is a group of conservationists
from Pelican Bay and outside, who are interested in monitoring
the health of Clam Bay and the mangroves, and we've been active
for the past -- since really the mangrove die-off in the
Page 178 of 5415
Page 48
March 4, 2025
early -- mid 1990s and really stimulated the county and PBSD to
institute management of Clam Bay.
Since that time, the mangrove die-off which had reached
54 acres was restored under PBSD's first management and
permit, and PBSD has continued to manage Clam Bay in a way
that is responsible and that takes into consideration the entire
ecosystem. It is a holistic approach.
And in the past, for example, when the plan was revised in
2014, the planning process was open to the entire community of
Collier County, including Seagate, and many people participated
in that planning process that led to the current parameters for
dredging.
I do not think it's correct to say that the PBSD waits until
there's a problem, and mangroves are dying and then steps in to
dredge. Rather it has established a system of monitoring that
carefully considers when the parameters indicate a dredging is
needed, and it's timed appropriately.
I'm sure everyone realizes that dredging is very, very
expensive. So if you dredge before the summer storm season,
it's very likely that a hurricane could come and fill in what you've
just dredged out. Similarly, about what they're looking at now, a
November dredging will help protect the ecosystem throughout
the winter when there are also storms. So the timing of the
dredging is very carefully considered according to parameters
that are constantly monitored.
The latest concern about Outer Clam Bay and the collapse of
the dune system is very worrying, and people of Pelican Bay
share that concern with people of Naples Cay and Seagate, and
we are -- the PBSD is right now considering all the options as to
what could be done to restore that stretch.
Page 179 of 5415
Page 49
March 4, 2025
Similarly, they're looking at what could be done to increase
the hand-dug channels in Outer Clam Bay that will help release
the water and maintain the health of that section.
So I -- the Pelican Bay Services Division is a county
division. It is open to input from everyone in the county, and I
think that Pelican Bay Services Divisions' record of management
of Clam Bay is stellar. And a lot this criticism, I think, needs to
look at what other water-quality contributors may be coming in.
And, you know, Neil Dorrill mentioned some of the issues
with dredging perhaps and cleanup being needed in the Seagate
canals as a factor affecting water quality.
So I urge people to work through the Pelican Bay Services
Division. They have an extensive history of successful
management of Clam Bay.
Thank you very much.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Thank you, Ms. Johnson.
MR. MILLER: And that was your final registered speaker.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: We're in a workshop, so we
can't make any decisions, but we can give direction to staff in
terms of future meetings.
So, Commissioner McDaniel, you're lit up.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I just have one quick
point that I'd like to make. The nice lady from Naples
Cay -- will you put up her picture on the visual, Ms. Amy? That
one. The one that's there.
And then we were given a copy of a map of a photo from
19 -- yeah, it was 2018. March 19th of 2018. And I just want
to show the strip of mangroves that goes north from Naples Cay
that was there in 2018 that is not now. And so, therefore, in lies
why we're here today and the conversations that we're having
Page 180 of 5415
Page 50
March 4, 2025
going forward.
I mean, restoration of mangroves is really nice, but we can't
control what Mother Nature's going to, in fact, hand us on a
regular basis.
So -- and I really appreciate the comments that came with
regard to baby steps. Consistency with regard to our
management efforts, our dredging efforts, and what we're here, in
fact, doing all the way across the board.
There's no argument that PBSD has done an amazing job
with the monitoring efforts with what, in fact, is transpiring. We
need to know from you -- and I'm looking at you, Mr. Dorrill. I
know you're hiding right now. But we need to know from you
what we can do to help you with regard to these steps along the
way for the overall health of the overall -- of the entire system,
not just -- not just upper, lower, inner, all of that.
MR. DORRILL: No, I think going back to some of my
opening comments, I think the most important thing that we need
to do is to renew the existing permits but then commit ourselves
to evaluate reasonable amendments and to rethink some of the
engineering or at least investigate it.
This is an oversimplification. But the reason that we don't
dredge it every year is the same reason that I don't replace the
tires on my car every year. It's not warranted.
And there's a huge difference between having a desire and
having the ability to get permits to do it that are tied to the
management plan that is in place. And it is -- it's just a
time-consuming thing. We have already committed to do the
full bathymetric survey and provide that to Seagate. We've
already committed to evaluate areas of concern following Ian of
mangrove die-off in your regional park. We are the entity who's
Page 181 of 5415
Page 51
March 4, 2025
got a proven track record of being able to reclaim and regrow
mangroves.
I can make a really good argument, though, that the county's
General Fund needs to help contribute some money, or the
Unincorporated Area General Fund, and not the people of Pelican
Bay when it comes to restoring or reclaiming the regional park
that is there. That's kind of a detail to work out with the County
Manager and see what she prefers.
So kind of a three-part process. But the third
element -- first element it to get the permit. Second element is to
evaluate amendments to the permit long term for the next 15
years.
Area No. 3, though, is to also evaluate what, if anything, the
city is going to do with the Seagate drainage system, because,
frankly, the stormwater system and the street stormwater system
are a first generation shotgun discharge straight into the canals.
There's no water retention. There are no water detention
facilities.
And so to a certain extent, the sediment and the
water-quality issues within the south end of what we're talking
about are because they were built in the 1960s at the same time
that they were dredging and filling. And so when it rains, the
water goes straight to the canal and thus the problem. And I
think that the people in Pelican Bay have a 40-year history of
taxing themselves to provide world-class amenities and, in
particular, have been good stewards of the system. So I think
there's kind of three tasks going forward, and that would be our
recommendations.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner Kowal.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Thank you, Chairman. I
Page 182 of 5415
Page 52
March 4, 2025
just have two questions. I'm not 100 percent sure, but where's
the majority of the funding source come from for the actual
dredging process itself?
MR. DORRILL: It all comes from tourist taxes.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Okay. All right. And I
guess the second question, I'm just -- I'm going to try to
reapproach, because it just piqued when Commissioner Hall had
asked the question about that. I think it's the area at R43. And
if you look at this, it almost looks like at one point, maybe
Mother Nature at one point, that was a natural flow in and out
because of the way that is saddled, because evidently that's a
deeper part in the outer bay. You know, it's like a V shape right
at 43 -- or 43.
MR. DORRILL: My understanding is there was never one
there, but there was -- if you look at the inlet on that same flow,
look at the actual inlet, just east of the inlet is sort of a little
mangrove peninsula. At one time in the last 15 years, there was
a second channel that fed and went down to Outer Clam Bay. It
sort of bypassed Section B and Section C. As soon as you got
inside the inlet, it made a hard right. And you can see, it's still
there, but it has filled in partially, and that's one of those things
that I'm talking about long-term that needs to evaluate. That
contributed a source of incoming saltwater that --
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Yeah.
MR. DORRILL: -- was more apt to end up in Outer Clam
Bay and in the south end of the system. And we've got aerial
records of that that would be evaluated at that time.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Because we all know -- well,
your own expert said that from Point A to Point B, our flow
doesn't change much, right?
Page 183 of 5415
Page 53
March 4, 2025
MR. DORRILL: Right.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: So we know that.
So that being a second source of saltwater coming in, it may
be a healthy thing for it if that is a possibility in the future.
MR. DORRILL: And historic.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Historic.
MR. DORRILL: Because at the end of the day, I've got to
convince the agencies that what we're doing is not altering a
system without some historic reference to be able to point to
benefits.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Yeah, I was just curious
because just -- if you look at that design and the way it jet -- it Vs
into the actual mangroves -- and there's not much room, even in
that newer picture. It's pretty much right up onto the beach.
I like to use little anecdotes, too, and I liked your tire one.
But you know, the reality is, if you put an extra 60,000 miles on
your car that year, you might want to change your tires. Mother
Nature's not stagnant. She's fluid. From year to year she
changes. So just, you know, food for thought.
MR. DORRILL: I put the tires on my wife's car before I
put them on my own car.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner McDaniel.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I have to get over the
changing the tire thing. Forgive me one second.
Historically is what we need to be talking about, Mr. Dorrill.
Our -- you know as well as I do -- and I said it at the beginning of
this -- Seagate used to have deepwater access for all of those
homes that are up in there. It's no longer there.
We have to look at the history with regard to it. We have to
look at the seagrass that's been created by that fancy word you
Page 184 of 5415
Page 54
March 4, 2025
used. I think my word was -- I had a different word before. But
you used a fancy word for the creation of seagrass that is there
now that thou shalt no longer destroy.
Has there been any exploration in an MSTU for the northern
portion of the city with regard to contribution for water quality
that's coming out of that particular area, for the substandard
drainage system that's coming out of that area, with regard to the
freshwater runoff that's coming in? Because that has an impact
on the sea -- thou shalt not harm the seagrass, but also if
you're -- if you're putting high nutrient-loaded water coming in
off of -- off of the land, that's going to have as large, if not a
larger detriment to the seagrass than anything.
MR. DORRILL: That and turbidity. Grass needs light to
grow. And as a result of sediment that gets stirred, especially
during tropical storm and hurricane and cold front season, cloudy
water is one of the leading contributors to seagrass decline. And
so anything that we can do to improve clarity as part of the
water-quality issue is smart.
But your main point is would our board welcome some sort
of cost-sharing or interlocal agreement with the city? I think the
county and the city have a long history of interlocal agreements.
But up to this point, that was also my point that was intended to
say that the Seagate system needs some maintenance of its own,
and it has not been maintained since probably the 1960s or the
early 1970s.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: All right. As I mentioned,
we're in a workshop, so we can't make any decisions, but we can
give some direction to the staff. And no one else is lit up here,
so I'm going to spend just a couple minutes.
The idea of creating an advisory board, I think that's a good
Page 185 of 5415
Page 55
March 4, 2025
idea. I'm not sure how that would be structured, but it would be
purely a board that would meet to give advice to the County
Commission and to the Pelican Bay folks. That board would
have no authority but to study an issue and report back to us.
So I'd like to just see if the manager would place on an
agenda item -- and I'll see if the Board agrees with this -- an item
to discuss the creation of that type of an advisory board to report
back to the County Commission and to Pelican Bay on issues
dealing with the -- with Clam Bay.
Ms. Patterson, is that something that would be reasonable
and something that you could evaluate and kind of report back to
us on?
MS. PATTERSON: Yes, sir. I'll work with the County
Attorney, and we'll bring something back.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: All right. If there's nothing
else on this particular issue, then we're going to be in recess until,
we'll say, 10 minutes till 11. You have one more point?
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: One quick point.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner McDaniel.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Only just as additional
direction. If you-all are of the mind, I would not only like to
have the advice with regard to how and what and when we need
to be doing, but I also would like to -- exploration of funding
sources. It isn't the total responsibility of Pelican Bay or the
county or the city. We're all in this together.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: All right. We will be in
recess until 10:50.
(A brief recess was had from 10:36 a.m. to 10:50 a.m.)
MS. PATTERSON: Chair, you have a live mic.
Page 186 of 5415
Page 56
March 4, 2025
Item #2B
LANDFILL/SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE - PRESENTED
BY KARI ANN HODGSON (DIVISION DIRECTOR - SOLID
WASTE), DR. GEORGE YILMAZ (DEPARTMENT HEAD -
PUBLIC UTILITIES), AND DANIEL DIETCH (PLANNING
CONSULTANT, SCS ENGINEERS) - DISCUSSED WITH
DIRECTION GIVEN
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Thank you. We're going to
get into the county landfill. I'm going to suggest, just in the
interest of -- I've said this before -- the shortness of human life,
let's not spend time on the history. I think we've read this, and
we understand that. I think the real issue is what are we going to
be doing going forward. So if we could start at that point, I
think -- unless there's some objection, I would ask that we do
that. Carrie.
MS. HODGSON: No, we can do that, Commissioner.
We'll fast forward through a few slides and get to that point.
And good morning, Commissioners. Thanks for your time
today. For the record, my name is Kari Hodgson. I'm your
director for solid and hazardous waste. And as mentioned, we're
here today to talk about long-term solid waste management
disposal.
When most people put out their garbage, all they really want
is for it to disappear. Once collected, it's out of sight, out of
mind. Moreover, they want it responsibly managed. To see
how our wastes are managed responsibly, I would like to invite
each of you to tour our county landfill, our recycling center, or
the Immokalee transfer station. A tour will give you a visual
Page 187 of 5415
Page 57
March 4, 2025
perspective behind today's presentation, as one cell remains to be
lined before the landfill expands vertically.
Solid Waste has a great presence and engagement in our
community with providing over 170 tours last year at our
county's landfill for businesses, community, specialized
leadership groups, as well as universities, public, private, and
homeschool groups.
As you heard earlier, the constituents of Collier County care
about preserving our paradise, and the policy actions that come
from today's workshop can serve for the future generations of
Collier County.
Commissioners, this is the third Solid Waste workshop that
has convened in Collier County. Extensive research, evaluation,
and analysis has gone into the presentation that you'll hear today.
The supporting information, including a recent report from
FDEP, as well as several major universities in Florida regarding
landfill capacity in Florida can be found on the agenda portal, and
we also have a binder representing a lot of the backup research
that's went into this presentation for today.
I'd like to thank our Public Utilities director, Dr. George
Yilmaz, and our County Manager for their support to bring this
topic to the Board today. Leading today's presentation will be
our Solid Waste industry expert, Mr. Daniel Dietch, who's
worked on various projects with Collier County over the past 20
years.
And with that, I will hand it off to Daniel Dietch. Thank
you, Daniel.
MR. DIETCH: Thank you, Kari. Good morning, Chair,
Vice Chair, Commissioners, professional staff and citizens of
Collier County who may be out there.
Page 188 of 5415
Page 58
March 4, 2025
For the record, as Kari said, I am Daniel Dietch, a solid
waste planning consultant with SCS Engineers. I am joined
today by some key members of our project delivery team,
Dr. George Yilmaz and Kari Hodgson and Bart Zautcke. And
we appreciate this opportunity to participate in this workshop.
We want to keep this informal and conversational and, consistent
with your direction, we're going to skip some slides, and I'll work
with Troy to make sure that we accomplish that.
We know the magnitude of this topic, so we want to be clear
eyed about the challenges and the opportunities before you. We
also want to set the intention that we do plan to return to you for
policy direction based on your feedback today.
Next slide, please. It should be Slide 2.
Let me start with an overview of the items that we will
discuss today. We're going to touch on the workshop purpose
and the bottom line. We are going to skip over the history and
many parts of your current system. And we really want to focus
on the long-term options, and we'll regroup with policy direction
and action items.
Next slide, please.
The county's made great progress over the past few decades
that we will not touch on, but it's in your briefing package. But a
true long-term disposal solution has not yet been realized, and the
options decrease as your population growth continues. So
long-term disposal is an important matter and critically important
to secure a best-value approach before the county faces a crisis.
I should share that the needs extend beyond any single
election cycle, and it requires an understanding of issues and
opportunity to achieve a true long-term best-value solution.
So why are we here today? We want to have a
Page 189 of 5415
Page 59
March 4, 2025
conversation about a few items related to solid waste
management that will come back to you, and those three areas
are, one, amending County Ordinance 2005-54 to create a single
solid waste district comprised of Municipal Service Benefit Units
1 and 2.
The second is to align the Landfill Operating Agreement
with your integrated solid waste management strategy, and third
is to achieve concurrence on the preferred option or options to
control your long-range solid waste management destiny in terms
of future solid waste disposal capacity.
It is also important to note that our discussion today is
consistent with the County Manager's strategic plan related to
solid waste which is to provide services and programs that
sustainably manage the county's solid waste.
All right. Troy, if we could slide -- advance to Slide 12.
And I just think it's important that we acknowledge where
you are today. And this slide simply reflects the results or the
benefits of implementing your current solid waste strategy.
So significantly, Collier County is one of three counties in
the state of Florida that is meeting or exceeding the State of
Florida's 75 percent recycling goal. This achievement is a
testament to having an integrated solid waste management
strategy, a long and connected history of solid waste leadership,
and capable partners that provide contracted best-value solid
waste services.
Next slide, please.
So let's turn our attention to Action Item 1, which is
essentially a housekeeping item to amend County Ordinance
2005-54 to create a single solid waste district comprised of
Municipal Service Benefit Units 1 and 2. It doesn't practically
Page 190 of 5415
Page 60
March 4, 2025
change anything at this point, but it does allow for service-level
parity, administrative efficiency, reduced ambiguity to the
customer, and affords greater flexibility for disposal if needed,
which can best be accomplished with a single solid waste district.
Next slide, please.
The second action item is to align the Landfill Operating
Agreement with your integrated solid waste management
strategy. Historically, the Landfill Operating Agreement has
focused on operations and odor management. As important as
that focus is, preserving disposal capacity is also critically
important. Currently, the Landfill Operating Agreement does
not have any standards for waste compaction, so there is little
incentive to preserve airspace from an operational standpoint.
And as we know, the greatest population growth is planned
for the northeast portion of the county. One critical focus area is
to optimize the disposal operations at the Collier County Landfill.
This can best be accomplished by aligning the Landfill Operating
Agreement with the integrated solid waste management strategy,
including establishing a performance specification for in-place
waste density. It also means securing new long-term disposal
agreements for solid waste and disaster-related debris that
prioritize operational flexibility. Again, before a crisis arises.
Next slide, please.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Daniel, can I ask you a
question real quick?
MR. DIETCH: Sure.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Back on the Action Item No. 1,
you said something about ambiguity to the customers or -- what
did you say about the customers?
MS. HODGSON: Yeah. So because we have
Page 191 of 5415
Page 61
March 4, 2025
commissioner districts, a lot of our customers think that when we
refer to districts for collection, they think that we're referring to
your districts. So we have the -- so we would like to remove that
ambiguity.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Sure, thank you.
MR. DIETCH: Okay. So let's now turn our attention to
Action Item 3, which is controlling your long-range solid waste
management destiny. And this is a challenge that is not unique
to Collier County. There are several long-term disposal options
that were explored by your staff that we will discuss. These
options include -- and, Troy, if you could advance
through -- out-of-county disposal, a new landfill, technology
conversion, landfill reclamation, and expanding your existing
landfills.
MS. HODGSON: You can keep going through those, Troy.
MR. DIETCH: Yep, until we get to the next slide.
MS. HODGSON: There you go.
MR. DIETCH: Okay. Here we are. So we're going to
start with outer county disposal. And based on our analysis, we
found that Marion County is the only county comparable in
population to Collier County that does not provide final disposal
of solid waste within their county.
Out-of-county disposal requires infrastructure such as rail
lines and/or transfer stations, and we have looked at all the rail
lines, both currently and abandoned, and found that all options
are cost prohibitive. Also, the county only has one transfer
station, which is located at the Immokalee landfill, and it would
need to be improved to manage any more waste generated in
District 2 than is currently managed.
Further, a new transfer station would be required at the
Page 192 of 5415
Page 62
March 4, 2025
Resource Recovery Business Park in District 1 immediately north
of the Collier County Landfill. Still, we must be sensitive to the
impacts of transferring waste out of county, especially traffic. A
rule of thumb is that 1,000 tons, which is what goes to the Collier
County Landfill each day, would require more than 50
tractor-trailers on the roads, and that would adversely impact the
quality of life for many in the county as well as increased road
maintenance requirements.
Also, significantly, the closest private landfill is
approximately two and a half hours away one way. It's a
tremendous impact not just in Collier County, but for every
community along the way and back. Also, the cost to transfer
waste out of county is approximately 135 percent greater than
managing it within the county. In addition, when waste is
transferred out of county, the county assumes risks that are
different than for in-county disposal. These include the fact that
the county would assume liability for every other source of solid
waste that is disposed of at that landfill as well as the risk of an
unplanned closure of that disposal facility. So the bottom line is
that out-of-county disposal alone is not controlling your solid
waste destiny.
Next slide, please.
Next we're going to talk about a new landfill. The idea of a
new landfill has been discussed and explored over at least the last
30 years. Going back to the late '90s, three properties were
presented to the County Commission to be explored as potential
sites, but unfortunately, the county was sued for the potential
acquisition.
At that time, the Commission directed staff to instead focus
on recycling and maximizing existing assets. That has
Page 193 of 5415
Page 63
March 4, 2025
absolutely worked and bought some time.
Developing a new landfill is challenging, as evidenced by
the length of time since the last new municipal landfill opened in
Florida, which was in 1998. That's just to the north of us, in
Sarasota County. Siting a new landfill is no easy task; however,
landfills generally have lower capital costs and operational costs
compared to other volume, reduction, or management alternatives
such as waste to energy. It typically takes 10 years or more to
site, permit, and construct a new landfill.
Ideally, if you're going through that effort, you're going to
want a site that is large enough to earn a decent return on your
investment. We typically look for a site that is a thousand acres
or more, recognizing that much of the space would serve as a
buffer to separate on-site activities from the offsite uses.
This is important, especially as more and more communities
are expanding and as Collier County continues to be developed.
Still, siting is the single greatest challenge; however, it will
certainly be easier today than it will be in the future because we
know land scarcity is going to increase rather than decrease going
forward. But we also have to be clear that there will be public
opposition to a new landfill. Regardless, a new landfill is
controlling your solid waste management destiny, but it is often
described as the fight of a lifetime.
Next slide, please.
Next I'll talk about technology conversion. The county has
explored thermal conversion technologies over the last 40 years.
The conclusion of a lot of work is that only mass burn and
refuse-derived fuel waste-to-energy facilities are commercially
proven volume-reduction systems. And even with the use of
such an approach, a landfill is still needed to dispose of the ash
Page 194 of 5415
Page 64
March 4, 2025
that is generated from the combustion process.
Collier County has been down this road before. In 1985,
the county issued bonds for a new waste-to-energy facility, and
just five years later the concept was abandoned and the bonds
were closed.
At the turn of the century, the Commission directed staff to
discuss a waste-to-energy partnership with Lee County, and at
that time Lee County was not interested.
Then in 2002, the county issued a solicitation for a large
capacity thermal conversion technology, which was ultimately
abandoned due to the high costs.
While there were many interesting thermal conversion
concepts that are being touted, only mass burn and refuse-derived
fuel waste-to-energy systems are operating on a commercial scale
with the proven reliability needed to manage the solid waste that
is generated in Collier County every day.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Can you say that last
statement again.
MR. DIETCH: Sure. When -- only -- I'll read it verbatim,
and then I will explain it further. Only mass burn and
refuse-derived fuel waste-to-energy systems are operating on a
commercial scale with the proven reliability needed to manage
the solid waste that is generated every day in Collier County.
Still, to be responsive to the marketplace and to keep abreast
of opportunities, Collier County recently issued a request for
expressions of interest to technology firms worldwide. The
responses varied, but the only thermal systems that operate
commercially are traditional waste to energy.
Now, Palm Beach County has taken a different approach
than Collier County. They also have an integrated solid waste
Page 195 of 5415
Page 65
March 4, 2025
management system with waste to energy as its primary volume
reduction technology. They tried to develop a new landfill on
the western portion of their county about 15 years ago, but there
was a lot of concern, and by "concern" I mean outrage from
interested parties about a landfill located there. The county
ultimately abandoned their plans to develop a new landfill, sold
the land, and instead built a new mass burn waste-to-energy
facility at a cost of nearly $700 million, and now they're planning
to replace their original refuse-derived fuel waste-to-energy
facility when it reaches the end of its useful life and replace it
with a new mass burn waste-to-energy facility.
As you may be aware, Miami-Dade County is going through
similar challenges right now. Their refuse-derived fuel
waste-to-energy facility suffered a fire two years ago, and it has
remained closed since, and it has changed their solid waste
management system dramatically.
The county has been unable to select a site for a new
waste-to-energy facility. And while they are now exploring
other opportunities, even though waste to energy was their
preferred path forward, they are now looking at landfills, and
specifically landfilling outside of the county.
It is our belief that using a conversion technology is
controlling your solid waste management destiny, but it is not
advisable due in part to the amount of waste that Collier County
has remaining after recycling. It simply doesn't achieve the
economies of scale that make these sorts of technologies cost
effective.
Next we'll talk about landfill reclamation.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: One moment, please.
Commissioner Hall.
Page 196 of 5415
Page 66
March 4, 2025
MR. DIETCH: Sure.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Thank you.
It seems to me like we've been getting emails from one
company or maybe two that they want to take our trash and do
something with it and do it on their dime. I never have really
gotten into it. I think I probably just forwarded those to
Dr. George. What is that guy all about? And would that
help -- would that be helpful to us in -- or maybe doing a hybrid
system?
MR. DIETCH: Yeah. So I think I'm familiar with the
company, or the consortium that you're referring to. We
have -- part of the reason that we conducted the request for
expressions of interest, which is really the lowest level, in terms
of effort, of solicitation. We asked for information: Where
have they done it before where they're processing municipal solid
waste either a portion of what Collier County generates or all of
what Collier County generates? And unfortunately, the
technology has not been demonstrated to manage waste on a
consistent basis and at a commercial scale. And we asked for
those reference projects so that we could be diligent in our
analysis.
The handful of responses that were received, we ranked
them in terms of technology readiness. And believe me, not just
the consulting team, your entire team is always looking out over
the horizon to see where the emerging technologies are. And it's
often described as we want to be on the leading edge but not the
bleeding edge. So oftentimes, you may want to consider being
the second entity that has adopted, you know, the next greatest
technology.
But our assessment is that mass burn, waste to energy, and
Page 197 of 5415
Page 67
March 4, 2025
refuse-derived fuel are proven. They've been -- they have an
operating record in the United States over many, many decades.
I'll also share that there's a lot of technologies that are being
adapted from other industries, and solid waste is not like -- for
example, gasification is well proven in the coal industry, but coal
is -- you can have a consistent particle size, consistent dryness,
right? So the attributes of that material are very different than
municipal solid waste.
COMMISSIONER HALL: What was that guy's
technology? It was not burn?
MR. DIETCH: It was three-phase microwave reactors.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Yeah, microwave.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Okay.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner McDaniel.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Just -- and this is just a
quick clarification for me. When I was reading ahead, as
Ms. Kari suggested that I do, in this -- in this total amount of
collected tons, is the total recycling tons part of that dark blue, or
is it in addition to the dark blue?
MS. HODGSON: That is the recycling tons only. Let me
double-check.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Because that doesn't
answer my question.
MS. HODGSON: I apologize.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Don't be sorry. I just -- I
want a clarification. Because to me it looks like -- if the dark
blue is our total tons collected and the light blue is the total tons
recycled, that means about 20 percent of our total collected needs
to be disposed in some form or format, because we're
manipulating -- about 80 percent of our collections are being
Page 198 of 5415
Page 68
March 4, 2025
recycled.
MR. DIETCH: That's correct.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Is that correct?
MS. HODGSON: That is correct. The dark blue is the
total tons collected, and the light blue is part of those total tons
collected.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Very good. Thank you.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: And let me ask you another
question. Other technologies, have we explored any
technologies out of Europe or other countries? You know, I say
that because -- you know, just take nuclear, for example. France
is almost all nuclear power for electricity. They're way ahead of
us. Are there other countries that are doing things a little
differently? Has that been explored?
MR. DIETCH: Yes, but not for solid waste, municipal
solid waste. There are technologies that, for example, in Japan
that are processing, quote-unquote, select waste. So
that -- there's a lot of preprocessing and segregation and then
manipulation of the material to make it more uniform, so more
homogenous rather than heterogeneous. But that is not what
you're generating here, right? When it's picked up at the curb, it
is commingled, and -- well, to be kind, it's heterogeneous. So --
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: The reason I mention that is,
you know, obviously, you do a request for some interest. You're
going to get some presentations. But I don't know how broad
that would have gone, and at some point we might want to just
take a look at what they're doing in other countries.
MR. DIETCH: Yeah. And I'm going to remind
Dr. George, because he went on a world tour back in 2002, when
the county issued a solicitation for an emerging conversion
Page 199 of 5415
Page 69
March 4, 2025
technology system, and there were facilities operating in
Germany, in Italy that, unfortunately, were no longer
operating -- or at this point they're no longer operating.
But, yeah, regularly looking out over the horizon, not just in
Florida, not just in the United States, but globally, and that was
the intention with the request for expressions of interest through
the procurement system to announce it to the world that Collier
County was --
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: I guess if there's a worldwide
trip that comes up, Dr. George probably wouldn't be the
representative going. It will probably be, you know, some
commissioner. I'm just kidding.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Maybe the Chairman.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: It depends on who the
Chairman is.
MS. HODGSON: To add to that -- to add to that, when we
look at the technologies that have been presented -- and these
companies did respond to our request of -- or expressions for
interest, we look at the applicability to Collier County. We have
to look at the waste generation, if there's opportunities for
partnerships. But again, ensuring that it's proven as well and the
types of collection we have and if that would also need to be
impacted by the technology or the alternative disposal that's
presented to us.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Thank you.
MR. DIETCH: Okay. So Collier County has a rich
history with landfill reclamation. It is an approach that is
typically used to address an environmental -- environmental
liability. It is not commonly used to reclaim airspace at modern
landfills. Reclamation has been performed twice for unlined
Page 200 of 5415
Page 70
March 4, 2025
portions of the Collier County Landfill. The first section that
was reclaimed was associated with an old county gun range, and
there was lead contamination.
Then subsequently, a 22-acre area was reclaimed to allow
for the buildout of the new lined disposal cells at the Collier
County Landfill. In both cases, what it provided was the
removal of an environmental hazard that cleared the way for your
planned landfill development.
With the Immokalee Landfill, it's a very different situation.
That is an unlined, enclosed landfill. When I say "unlined," I
mean there's no liner at the bottom, just a liner at the top. And as
mentioned earlier, the solid waste that is received at the
Immokalee transfer station is delivered -- transferred out of
county to the Okeechobee landfill.
Significantly, that site is located in a part of the county that
is experiencing rapid and what we expect to be sustained
population growth, and reclaiming the Immokalee Landfill would
present an opportunity to reduce an environmental liability while
creating an opportunity to develop new disposal capacity for the
future.
Next slide, please.
The Immokalee Landfill reached capacity in 2003. The
whole site is approximately 120 acres, and the footprint for the
disposal cells is less than 21 acres. The maximum height of the
site is 80 feet.
The neighbors immediately to the left are county jail and a
county fleet facility, and we know that there are some challenges
that we're exploring now in terms of distance to the Immokalee
airport. But we also know that the surrounding sections of that
site are agricultural, which would provide a great buffer. Our
Page 201 of 5415
Page 71
March 4, 2025
conclusion is that reclaiming and redeveloping the Immokalee
Landfill is controlling your solid waste management destiny.
Next slide, please. The last option we want to explore is
optimizing your existing landfill.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Before you move on with that,
Daniel, Commissioner Hall.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Thank you, Chairman.
I can't help but think about the Grinch. One man's trash is
another man's potpourri. Is there any potential at all for some of
the -- maybe for something smaller like Immokalee, is there
any -- in the reclamation process for privatization or
private-public partnership, or is it just all on us?
MS. HODGSON: As far as the disposal?
COMMISSIONER HALL: As far as just -- yeah, you
know.
MS. HODGSON: So right now we currently are contracted
with Waste Management to operate the Immokalee Transfer
Station as well as the Collier County Landfill. As part of the
action items here, we discussed as No. 2 amending that Landfill
Operating Agreement to secure disposal capacity at other
landfills, not just for garbage generated in Collier County but also
for hurricane debris.
So we have a great partnership that's been long standing
with Waste Management as far as the operation of our disposal,
but there's -- there could also be opportunities. That's why we
look at these requests for information or express interest for
technologies to see if there are other compatible partnerships for
Collier County.
Does that answer your question?
COMMISSIONER HALL: Yeah, similar -- I mean, kind
Page 202 of 5415
Page 72
March 4, 2025
of. I guess my mind was going to if we turned over the waste
management in an area to some private company, they could
basically wholesale our trash and sell it to somebody that wants
to do the three-phase microwave. You know, I didn't know if
that was an -- I'm just sitting up here freewheeling.
MS. HODGSON: No, no. I appreciate the engagement.
So when we put out for these expressions for interest to see,
again, what kind of partnerships could exist, those could be
potentials. So if the microwave theory existed and that was a
partnership between either us indirectly with the processor or
directly with another private company then to the processor,
those are all opportunities that would be explored and presented
if they existed.
COMMISSIONER HALL: My thoughts were, if we turned
it over to somebody that's a -- you know, to a private company, if
they're buying our trash from us so that they can sell it to a
microwave, then they can prove the process. It's on their dime,
it's on their risk, and we still get our trash moved. So that's all I
was thinking about.
MR. DIETCH: And you would absolutely just want a
backup plan because the garbage that's generated is generated
every day, and it's picked up nearly every day. So you do have
to make sure that it is managed responsibly every day.
And I will tell you, in the solicitation that was issued in
2002, the Commission at that time was interested in innovative
technologies. One of the provisions in the contract, which was
never consummated, was if the county provides a site for a
demonstration facility, if the project never achieves substantial
completion, the site has to be returned to its original state. So
there are ways to incorporate safeguards so that the county is not
Page 203 of 5415
Page 73
March 4, 2025
buying undo risk.
COMMISSIONER HALL: I guess, in Commissioner
LoCastro's terms, I was just up here spitballing.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Hey, stick to the topic.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner McDaniel.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yeah. Well -- and if I
heard you correctly, even though the three-phase microwave
sounds pretty smurfy, it's not really viable technology. Is that
what I heard?
MR. DIETCH: It may very well be. It has not
demonstrated as a system to process municipal solid waste the
way that it is placed at the curb in Collier County or any other
community.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Because of -- just
because. So even though it sounds like a wonderful idea, it
hasn't yet been proven to --
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Not for us.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: -- be actually viable as of
yet, number one. Number two, the reason you're here today is
because we do care. The Board that heard this in 2002 were told
they had 52 years before the landfill expired. Now we're looking
at 30 years. And you've already told us what it takes to site a
new landfill and go through all of the processes. So that's the
reason that you're here today. We don't want to have this
discussion in another 20 years and with another board and we're
like this (indicating).
Now, my question for you is -- you mentioned reclamation
twice, but I haven't -- I didn't see a good synopsis of that. What
actually transpires with reclamation? We've already done it once
at the big landfill or -- okay, twice, to correct me.
Page 204 of 5415
Page 74
March 4, 2025
What actually transpires with reclamation? Or am I getting
ahead of where you're going?
MR. DIETCH: No. It's a timely question. I mean, it's a
permitted process, and the permit is through the State of Florida,
where the material is excavated and screened. Because historic
disposal practices used a lot more soil and higher quality soil than
is currently available.
So you separate out the soil from the recyclable materials.
And there's various mechanisms to segregate out the plastics and
the metals and the like. The recyclable materials can then be
processed. The sand -- the soil can be stockpiled, and the waste
can be placed into a new disposal cell. That's exactly what
happened at the Collier County Landfill. And the concept that
we've been exploring is doing the same thing at Immokalee to
remove that environmental liability but first develop new lined
cells so that excavation occurs, the screening occurs, but then that
material has a place to go that is on site.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: That's what I thought I
heard you say. I just wanted you to say it again. I'm sorry for
making you repeat yourself.
MR. DIETCH: No, no. It's quite all right.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner Kowal.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Thank you, Chairman.
So I was following what Commissioner Hall and
Commissioner McDaniel were talking about, this three-phase
microwave thing, and I totally agree with you that this -- you
know, everything sounds like it's a good thing until you actually
sit down and actually watch it work and if it actually does work
or not.
But let's say, you know, if it was an opportunity
Page 205 of 5415
Page 75
March 4, 2025
to -- because evidently, the gentleman -- they must make a profit
off of whatever their by- -- whatever the result of their process is,
or they wouldn't be in the business.
Why would we have to have -- like, Commissioner Hall,
with a -- somebody to sell our landfill to just to give it -- just to
sell it to another -- to a third party? Why couldn't that [sic]
something we can do in the future if it does become a viable
operation that we could sell directly to this individual so he could
make a profit off of his three-phase microwave whatever he calls
it?
But, you know, that would offset what we're already
spendings anyways. So instead of having a third party involved,
is that something possibly in the future, if this does become
something -- if it's the next greatest thing since sliced
toast -- which was not even a good idea. It actually brought
bacteria into the food. But I'm going off subject again.
But -- so, I mean, is that a possibility, too?
MS. HODGSON: Yeah. So the partnerships could be 3P;
they could be between the county and the processors. It
could -- it would really just depend on the business plan, how that
looks for the county. For these emerging technologies, or any
technology, we would want the county to be in the most least-risk
position.
So having an agreement where they're buying our waste
would be an ideal solution. Most companies will not buy your
waste even if they're generating a byproduct. And, again, it
comes back to when we talk about the pyrolysis, the microwave.
The only thing in the United States we've seen is waste to energy
and landfilling, and the waste is betting paid to go, and it's a
waste minimization technique.
Page 206 of 5415
Page 76
March 4, 2025
So if it ever does come to fruition that those technologies are
proven and economically feasible and scalable to Collier County,
and applicable, that's something that we would bring back to the
Board with recommendations for the type of agreement that
would be in place.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: I've got a --
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Oh, I'm sorry.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: I'm sorry. I thought you were
finished. I'm sorry.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: And I don't know if I'm
jumping ahead, but I remember after Hurricane Ian and touring,
you know, the northern section over there where the landfill is,
we occupied a large portion to the north of the road, kind of
where our deepwater injection area is --
MS. HODGSON: Uh-huh.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: -- for all that white material,
like refrigerators, stoves, things of that nature, and a lot
of -- some other debris that didn't go into our landfill. Now
that -- using that, was that a temporary thing, or is that already
existing permits for those properties as part of the original
landfill, north of the landfill?
MS. HODGSON: So couple things for that.
That's -- when we have a hurricane, we have debris management
sites to manage the debris that's picked up by a separate
contractor, not your standard curbside contractor, but our debris
removal contractors. And FEMA requires that we separate out
those recycle materials, such as the white goods, appliances.
That also happens every day in collection, just for the -- for what
it's worth noting.
The land that is north of the landfill does have a permitted
Page 207 of 5415
Page 77
March 4, 2025
debris management site. So that is permitted specifically for that
use during those emergency times for the debris removal mission,
and it is part of the contract and part of FEMA requirements that
the materials that can be recycled are recycled, such as the white
goods.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Like our Immokalee site,
which we know has some older technology, is not lined, but
which it sounds like -- that what we get out of there is actually
quality dirt to mix with new fill when we do line an area to keep,
like, an ongoing process when you're taking here and building
there or taking here, building there. You have material on site to
do it.
That northern section, would that be something easier to
bring into a permit that already exists than going out and trying to
get a whole new permitting process for property we already own?
MR. DIETCH: That is correct. The information that
needs to be submitted to the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection is the same. So the goal would be to
modify your long-term care closure permit for development,
construction, and then operation.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Thank you.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Yeah. That was one of the
questions I was going to ask in terms of Immokalee. It's
120 acres, and that's a permitted landfill for the whole 120, or is it
just for the 20 acres that's being -- that was being used?
MR. DIETCH: The site is permitted, but for disposal; it
was the two disposal cells that are now closed.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Just the 20.5 acres?
MR. DIETCH: Correct. But you have flexibility within
the entire site if you were to change from a long-term care
Page 208 of 5415
Page 78
March 4, 2025
operation to active landfilling again.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Now, 120 acres, does that -- in
terms of just duration, how much time does that get you if you're
looking at the growth in the county, if you had a 120-acre
landfill? Because I'm assuming you can't, at each of the borders,
have a --
MR. DIETCH: I'm going to give you an unsatisfying
response, and that is "It depends."
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Yeah.
MR. DIETCH: So with -- you know, with direction, we
can analyze the site and try to figure out, within that footprint,
what could be accomplished, because there is an ongoing project
at that site to build a new recycle center. So that's taken a
portion of the site out of play.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Is there land around there that
could be acquired to expand that site?
MR. DIETCH: There is.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: So at least theoretically we do
have a small site that might serve as a landfill in an emergency.
MS. HODGSON: And, Troy, if you could go back a slide,
please.
So this slide shows the Immokalee Landfill outlined in red
to your left, and there's surrounding acres that are agricultural
around it, and the 20 acres of landfill cell that are on that property
are very small. It's the two most eastern hills, if you will, on that
property.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Okay.
MS. HODGSON: Thank you.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: All right. Commissioner
Hall.
Page 209 of 5415
Page 79
March 4, 2025
COMMISSIONER HALL: Thank you, Chairman.
I want to go back to the idea -- I'm not advocating for this by
any means. I'm just trying to freewheel think. Since the
guy -- on the microwave, since he doesn't have any history,
doesn't have anything to base his credibility on, what if we were
to allow him to take a small portion on his dime and give him a
small portion and let him test himself and get his history with us,
and if he's successful, we grow it. If he's not, we boot him. So
those are just things I'm thinking.
DR. YILMAZ: If I might, for the record, George Yilmaz,
your department head for Public Utilities.
Commissioner, by answering your inquiry or question, I'm
going to address at the same time similar inquiry that came from
our Commissioner Kowal as well as Commissioner McDaniel.
So one way to achieve going after emerging and proven
technologies is that optimizing opportunities north of the landfill,
which is called Solid Waste Park, business park. We own that
land, and it's permitted for all activities but landfilling. So that
will require some permitting and land-use change.
But for the purpose of a pilot program -- like you laid out,
for a purpose of a pilot program, out of RFI, request for
information, we have a number of applicants, and we're in the
process of looking into number of RFPs, which is next step for
looking into technologies, proven, and if some proven, entertain a
pilot program, small portion of the waste, demonstrate to us. We
have very smart minds on our team to develop a contract, an
agreement, which will put no liability to our board and the county
but get into some kind of demonstration project.
I think that we have the intellectual power and American
ingenuity for us to be able to take reasonable risk and get close to
Page 210 of 5415
Page 80
March 4, 2025
leading edge but definitely test the cutting edge.
So I just want to share this with our board that we're not
running away from risk. We want to manage it all the way to
line leading edge. And I think that a pilot program north of the
landfill for this emerging technologies, called Solid Waste
Business Park and permitted for such, would be a good location,
and you will see, as part of this workshop, we will have number
of solicitations going out, and adjustments will be made in terms
of our integrated solid waste management, and I hope I did
answer your inquiries about how we're going to go about
emerging non-proven technologies that I think we need to be
open-minded for.
COMMISSIONER HALL: No, that satisfies mine. I
mean, I'm all about taking a risk without it being risky. It's
possible.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner McDaniel.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yes. And on that note, I
think we have to have faith that our staff is looking at all
emerging technologies and looking at all alternatives for us,
because this is as dire a concern with them as it is for us and the
long-term impacts for our entire community.
So with that said, you've been real good about talking about
the waste-to-energy cost, $700 million. What's the revenue?
MR. DIETCH: The cost is for --
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Well, that was an
example you used at Palm Beach. That was a $672 million
expense for Palm Beach.
MR. DIETCH: Correct.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: But I don't -- I didn't
see -- what's the revenue? How do you get the money back, or
Page 211 of 5415
Page 81
March 4, 2025
what's the rate of return for that investment other than longevity?
MR. DIETCH: Typically, the bonds are paid off. It's a
20-year note. But remember, solid waste is a cost. There can
be an offset, so some of the offsets are metal recovery on the
back end, sale through a power purchase agreement of electricity
to the utility. In their case it's Florida Power & Light. But it is
still a net cost. So, really, I can answer your question that the
expense is offset by revenue. That's really in, you know, two
directions, the energy and the material that is recovered. But it
is paid for as an essential service for managing the solid waste.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I understand --
DR. YILMAZ: If I might, Commissioners. It's paid by the
customers. Revenue is coming from customers with increased
cost of municipal solid waste management disposal. So instead
of costing us $54, customer's paying per ton, it will go up $150
whatever that matching revenue will be. So it will be burdened
by our own current customers.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I understand. But -- and
I understand that that becomes a cost for the customer base. But
is there any data coming from the revenue generated for the
waste-to-energy conversion for the disposition of the steel if it's
extracted out or the energy that's, in fact, created? Do we have
any idea of what the revenue generation is that offsets that initial
burden?
MS. HODGSON: I can -- I can answer that. We can
follow up with some data information based on some counties
that have waste-to-energy, such as Lee County, Palm Beach.
And also just to put on the record and keep in mind is your solid
waste management is an enterprise fund and to -- so far in
history, it has been cash and carry. It doesn't mean that can't
Page 212 of 5415
Page 82
March 4, 2025
change, but I just want to make sure I did put that on the record
for how it has been for the past, since conception [sic]. We can
certainly come back with that.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: A portion of our
discussions going forward if, in fact, we start looking at
waste-to-energy conversion and the siting of a facility, we need
to have the entire picture as to what can happen, not just the
expense associated, and that was the reason why I asked that
question.
MS. HODGSON: No, understood, and that makes
complete sense, and we'll have to follow up with some of the
agreements that those counties have with their operating entities
for those -- that different technology, yep.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner LoCastro.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: With regard to
Commissioner Hall's question when he basically was saying,
"How long would it take for the landfill to run out?" and then you
said, "Oh, you're going to hate this answer, but it depends," I
think for purposes of this workshop -- and it does kind of go in
line with the data that Commissioner McDaniel was talking
about. I think it would be helpful to have data that shows, "Hey,
all things being equal, if nothing changed, there was no growth in
Collier County, here's the number for the landfill. With
10 percent growth, here's when the landfill would be filled up."
And it's somewhat hypothetical, but it's at least a starting
point to put up on the wall, and then as you get through the years,
you grade it and say, "Wow, we were off. You know, we
expected 10 percent growth; there was 17 percent growth. So
now instead of the landfill being filled in 22 years, it's got maybe
19 years." And we know it's a little bit fluid, but when we're
Page 213 of 5415
Page 83
March 4, 2025
talking about, like, data that could be helpful, especially to our
replacements, as they sort of get -- start tracking those
guesstimates and then measuring them when we actually pass the
five-year point and go, wow, we were pretty close.
We -- you know, we guessed about a 9 percent growth in
population or what have you, and that shaved a couple of years
off the landfill, where, you know, the chart is going a little bit the
wrong way. We're about to run out of space a little quicker if it
continues or, you know, we're about right on track.
And that wouldn't have to be something that, you know,
NASA would need to figure out for us, but it would just be a
good guesstimate, you know, a chart to see about where we are
and then grade it, you know, over time during these workshops to
see if we're close. That would just be, you know, my input,
because I think it would sort of be important to sort of monitor
how close we're getting to really, you know, a cautious time that,
"Hey, we need to really start looking for something because we're
tracking that we're about to run out of space, you know, in 13
years," something like that.
MS. HODGSON: So -- yeah. And I just wanted to point
out, so we do that every year as part of the AUIR process for the
Collier County Landfill, and knowing that the garbage that goes
into the Collier County Landfill is all from what is -- we call
Municipal Service District 1, which is basically everywhere
except Ave Maria and Immokalee, which is transferred out.
We take -- we use the BEBR chart, which is based on
populations, not the unit growth. It's based on population
growth, and we look at the waste generation per unit. And we
adjust that every year, and we reflect on where we were.
So if you looked at the AUIR two years ago, the opening
Page 214 of 5415
Page 84
March 4, 2025
would say the estimated live was 2060; however, it's been
reduced by one year because we saw a waste generation increase
due to COVID or whatever it might be that we've seen in the
industry.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: And in that, does it show
a projection as to a guesstimate? Okay.
MS. HODGSON: Yes. So -- and that's -- so currently the
Collier County Landfill estimated capacity reaches 2059.
So -- and that's based on data from previous years, annual survey,
waste generation, and taking averages of those. That's part of
the Growth Management Plan for ensuring that capacity as well
as the 10-year lined -- I'm sorry -- 10-year of capacity
requirement and a two-year lined capacity.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: It still does depend, but
we at least have the --
MR. DIETCH: Yeah. Not to belabor the point, it was a
slightly different question from the Chair in terms of how much
disposal capacity could be gained at Immokalee --
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Right.
MR. DIETCH: -- with the scenario that we described.
And it does require, not putting a person on the moon, but some
engineering analysis, but that's why we wanted to have the
conversation, because if there was no interest from the
Commission, we're not going to advance that analysis.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Okay. Thank you.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner Kowal.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Thank you, Chairman.
I was just looking at the Immokalee site again, and I had
noticed that those four parcels around it are all owned by Silver
Strand, LLC. Do we know who that is, or do we have any clue?
Page 215 of 5415
Page 85
March 4, 2025
MS. HODGSON: Yeah. So as part of the -- we really did
a due diligence before we came here today, making sure that
anything we presented to you would end with an action item that
we could bring back to the Board for some policy direction.
So there is a current -- I think it might be listed on there.
There is a current application in for a mining in some parts of that
agricultural land. We have a study done on the permitting
feasibility. We have a study done on the land planning
feasibility. The owners are the Colliers that own that currently,
yes.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: So even that one parcel
that's -- that butts up to the original Immokalee, you're talking an
extra 460 -- about 580 -- you'd increase the footprint about
580 acres with just that one parcel of that LLC. And I know I
got people giggling at me way back in the day when we were
talking about the Colliers wanting a piece of our property that
they sold to us or we bought or whatever over there near their
new development by 29 and Oil Well.
And I says, "Everything comes with a price."
So if the Colliers have a piece of property that might
increase our waste management or our footprint around one of
our dumps, maybe that could be a tradeoff. And, you know, a
lot of people were like, "Ha, ha, ha."
Well, you know what, this might be an opportunity to strike
a deal. I don't know. Because they want something from us
that we have, and we could use something that they have.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: All right. Daniel --
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: We're in negotiations
with them on that 500 acres right now to exchange that 500 acres
for the east 500 of the Camp Keais piece that we already own. It
Page 216 of 5415
Page 86
March 4, 2025
isn't a secret. It's a matter of public record. We're going
through the environmental surveys. We're going through the
appraisals. We're going through all of the stuff. So that's in the
works today.
MS. HODGSON: And to add, as one of the last action
items that you'll see on here when we talk about the policy
direction to come back to the Board with, it does list the potential
to revitalize the Immokalee Landfill. So if it was to the Board's
pleasure, we would then work closely with the Growth
Management division on that discussion as -- and make sure that
we came back to the Board for any direction. But we certainly
don't want to leave it off the list of options without giving you the
due diligence.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: So you're telling me we have
a chance?
COMMISSIONER HALL: So you're saying there's a
chance.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Saying there's a chance.
All right, thank you.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Daniel, if you can go ahead
and proceed.
MR. DIETCH: If we could advance to --
MS. HODGSON: That's it.
MR. DIETCH: So we want to talk about optimizing your
existing landfill. This slide simply shows constraints and
opportunities. The Collier County Landfill has been there for
decades. The 305 property to its west was purchased by the
county, is now part of the City Gate Planned Unit Development,
or PUD, and it is used, as you know, for a marque sports
complex. The area to the north is the Resource Recovery
Page 217 of 5415
Page 87
March 4, 2025
Business Park PUD that was established for ancillary and support
services for the county landfill and other county functions;
however, there are two specific opportunities we would like to
talk about.
Next slide, please.
When we think about the two optimization opportunities,
one is contiguous to the Collier County Landfill but beyond the
current site, and that's what we're going to talk about first.
Eastern optimization really is a long-term opportunity.
When I say "long term," based on our preliminary analysis, we're
talking about potentially 15 generations worth of disposal
capacity if you were to optimize the Collier County Landfill
laterally, or to the east.
Next slide, please.
The entire acre [sic] is a square. It's 645 acres. The waste
area that we analyzed is 411 acres. And, again, it would be
contiguous as originally modeled to be aligned with the current
footprint of the Collier County Landfill, so on the northern
two-thirds of that site.
As I mentioned, we're looking at nearly 300 years of
capacity if built to the same height as the Collier County Landfill
is permitted to, or 200 feet. The capacity estimate does consider
adequate buffers to the north and to the east while the estimated
capacity would decrease if there were wider buffers. By any
measure, it would still be significant capacity gained; however, as
we talked about earlier, it would not be an easy lift. It would
require land acquisition, modifications of the Land Development
Code or LDC and PUD to allow a landfill in Section 31. It
would also require modifying a number of federal, state, local
environmental permits and the state or FDEP operating permit,
Page 218 of 5415
Page 88
March 4, 2025
including the operating and closure plans, and it may require
wetlands mitigation; may.
This opportunity has significant value, and it absolutely
would enable the county to control its solid waste destiny through
achieving a best-value solution.
It is important to note that your predecessors have provided
the policy direction, and your professional staff have done an
incredible job at maximizing recovery and expanding capacity.
What is presented to you is the opportunity to do what they have
not been able to do, which is provide a long-term solid waste
management solution for up to 15 generations.
Next slide, please.
The other opportunity for optimizing is within the existing
Collier County Landfill site. If both on-site areas were taken
advantage of, you would gain approximately 29 years of
additional capacity. That optimization has some of the same
requirements as the eastern expansion option we just discussed in
terms of modifying the LDC and PUD to expand the landfill
footprint to the south as well as modifying similar permits. This
is important. It would require moving stormwater west to the
305 property, and that is currently your stormwater is managed
on site in the southwest portion of the parcel.
So the only way to expand in that area would be to manage
the stormwater off site, and it would absolutely require wetland
mitigation if you developed these areas, because these areas are
designated as wetlands today.
Next slide, please.
Okay. Beyond the initiatives presented, I did want to share
some of the continued actions of your staff based on past policy
direction, and these activities include maximizing source
Page 219 of 5415
Page 89
March 4, 2025
reduction, reuse, and recycling as evidenced by Collier County
being one of three counties that is meeting or exceeding the
state's 75 recycling goal.
Continuous engagement with stakeholders soliciting their
feedback, including both the community as well as the vendors.
Benchmarking performance with peer counties, which is -- we
consider a best interest to understand where you stand relative to
your region, the state, and the country, and in some cases the
world. Evaluating best industry practices to enhance current and
developed new services and programs. As we've talked about,
maintaining situational awareness of emerging market trends and
technologies, and delivering best-value solid waste management
services that are consistent with your enduring guiding principles.
Last slide.
So as we complete our discussion today, I want to thank you
for your time and your valuable and insightful input. I will close
with the following action items to return to the Commission to
seek the following policy direction.
As we started with, amending County Ordinance 2005-54 to
create a single solid waste district. Again, this is viewed as a
housekeeping item that does not have any impact today but could
be provided with greater flexibility in the future.
The second is amend the Landfill Operating Agreement to
align with the integrated solid waste management strategy and,
for all intents and purposes, clean it up. There have been a
number of amendments to the Landfill Operating Agreement over
its life, and it would certainly benefit from being conformed as
well as better aligning the service expectations and opportunities
to maximize the value of that asset.
As we touched on, establishing compaction performance
Page 220 of 5415
Page 90
March 4, 2025
standards to maximize airspace. And again, we talk about
having mitigation plans. You currently have long-term disposal
capacity agreements with Waste Management at their other
facilities, but they're somewhat limited in terms of tons or
volume. So it's also an opportunity to secure long-term disposal
capacity at their regional landfills, not only for solid waste that's
generated every day but also disaster debris, which as you can
speak to your neighbors to the north, they have been reckoning
with over the past several hurricane seasons.
And lastly, to achieve concurrence to control your
long-range solid waste management destiny. So identifying a
time frame to secure eastern properties to expand the Collier
County Landfill; modifying the LDC/PUD and the permits;
negotiate expansion of the operational boundaries with Waste
Management, your contract operator of the landfill; and engage
with stakeholders and potential partners regarding revitalizing the
Immokalee Landfill to address the growing needs in that area.
We now look to you to provide your guidance and direction,
and our team is available to answer any questions you might
have.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner Hall.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Thank you, Chairman. So
great presentation, well laid out. Made me think, made me think
a lot. And as I'm looking at the latest one for the landfill
expansion, you mentioned it's $390 million development cost for,
what, another 300 years of use. Has there been any thought of
how much it would be or how much money or obstacles you
anticipate to get us another 100 years? Instead of taking such a
big bite of the pie, maybe a smaller bite.
MR. DIETCH: I mean, it's scalable.
Page 221 of 5415
Page 91
March 4, 2025
COMMISSIONER HALL: It is scalable?
MR. DIETCH: Yeah, and we can run that analysis and get
you --
COMMISSIONER HALL: You don't have to. I was just
thinking. I'm up here spitballing.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Three hundred years is a long
time.
COMMISSIONER HALL: It's a long time.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Are we paying him to
think?
COMMISSIONER HALL: Not very much.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: They'll have that microwave
thing down pat by then.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Anything else, Commissioner
Hall?
COMMISSIONER HALL: No.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Okay. Commissioner
McDaniel.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yes. And, you know,
going to the east is a terribly, terribly arduous process. There's
people, there's businesses, there's houses out there. Oh, my.
Oh, my. You want -- you want -- you want pitchforks and
torches? So -- but the scalability aspect of it, Mr. Hall, is
certainly a discussion point that we can have.
The one thing that I saw you gloss over, because it was my
read-ahead -- and I read ahead, by the way, just so you
know -- were the bioreactors. We didn't have a discussion with
regard to the bioreactors. There's a picture of them in here that I
saw, but we really didn't talk about those and whether or not that
they could be technology or availability to help us lengthen our
Page 222 of 5415
Page 92
March 4, 2025
useful life. Are you not talking about them on purpose?
MS. HODGSON: So which slide are you referring to for
the bioreactors?
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Well, it's what I thought,
they were bioreactors. It was a picture -- let me find the picture.
This one. Resource Recovery Business Park here. These look
like bioreactors down here. Is that not bioreactors?
MS. HODGSON: No, that's not bioreactors. So that is
basically explaining that in order for the vertical expansion at the
landfill, which is where all the landfill life and capacity is, a lot
of the operations, which is the slide before that, will be relocated
to that Resource Recovery Business Park. So that's a -- what
you're looking at is a conceptual plan of the activities that will
take place on the Resource Recovery Park. So we look at the
potential for digesters if they were needed as well for renewable
gas service sources.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Okay. And so I
misconstrued that picture. And so what do bioreactors do for us
with regard to adding longevity to our landfill and its operations?
DR. YILMAZ: Commissioners, I'll take that.
Bioreactors, active landfilling, designed to convert Class 1
landfill, which we have currently, Naples Landfill permitted as
Class 1 landfill.
You actively manage the leachate and recirculate, and you
virtually turn landfill into an anaerobic digester. So it's a wet
landfill operation versus dry landfill operation. Dry landfill
operation takes all the leachate, as much as possible, with no
recirculation, let the landfill settle and biodigest itself over 30
years, 40 years. Bioreactors can be designed, smaller cells, and
every seven to 11 years, you're able to go back there, reuse the
Page 223 of 5415
Page 93
March 4, 2025
same place for new waste stream.
So scalability comes in. So if you have, let's say, 10
bioreactors in the form of landfills, advanced bioreactors, it will
take five years to fill one, and you go to next one, and you go to
next one. By the time 10 to 15 year hits, you're already
reclaiming the first one that you filled. So it's not a permanent
landfill you walk away from. It's a bioreactor. You're
managing the biodegration [sic] through leachate, and
micro-biome and, through means and methods, managing the gas.
So every bioreactor becomes renewable energy gas source. So
you get biogas, about 50 plus percent in this process.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: So for my nonscientific
brain, Doc, we actually, then, as part of the scalability of this
entire discussion, could add bioreactors into our world with the
expansion of the existing landfill or the reclamation of the
Immokalee Landfill. That would be a prudent thing, I would
think, if you're in the reclamation process, that you add an
installation of an apparatus that would allow for that
ultimate -- the newly created cell to be reclaimed and reutilized
again.
DR. YILMAZ: Yes, sir. And I think when you look at the
action items here from a policy decision-making standpoint, we
can bring those items; however, this is more on a strategic level,
as you know.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I understand.
DR. YILMAZ: Those are more tactical moves. So if we
need to -- for instance, if the Board says, "We don't want to be in
landfill business. Go after waste reduction technologies, like
waste to energy and other emerging technologies," that's the
direction we're going to take. But if the -- if the Board's wishes,
Page 224 of 5415
Page 94
March 4, 2025
we want to buy more land next to our current landfills and
optimize those landfills and close those landfills using current
sites that we own, and then we close the landfills in long term, it's
going to be our legacy.
Do we want to have Egyptian pyramid, or do we want to
have something like Baker's Park where landfill becomes
invisible and you can actually restore it as part of being a park,
passive and active use.
So if the Board wishes to say, "Go ahead and go after every
single action item you've got here, staff" -- and we'll come back
with hybrid solutions looking into visibility, land acquisition
surrounding Immokalee Landfill and permitability, same with our
current landfill, and go further, put RFPs out there, look into
options for waste reduction and energy technologies. And I
think that our consultant and staff give you -- these three action
items give us those flexibilities; am I correct?
MS. HODGSON: Correct.
DR. YILMAZ: Oh, by the way, I just want to mention,
Daniel Dietch is very unique engineer. Not only he's an
engineer, but he's an applied scientist. There's a difference. So
applied scientists think above and beyond four corners.
So thank you for being on board. Also, he's a former
mayor, so he knows and understands policy, what it takes to
move long-term decisions and lock it in so that it is one of those
legacy policy decisions and action items, regardless of
what -- what the Board might look like 10, 15 years from now.
That's a legacy program in front of you that you will shape while
you're on Board that will impact 15 generations.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Thank you, Doc.
DR. YILMAZ: Thank you, sir.
Page 225 of 5415
Page 95
March 4, 2025
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: And we're totally
impressed with you, just so you know. At least I am. I don't
know.
The quick question is, what effectively is the cost associated
with the bioreactors from an investment standpoint?
DR. YILMAZ: Plus/minus 5 percent, as same as dry
Class 1 landfill, because you're going after Class 1 landfill.
What you're doing with bioreactors is that you're regenerating
airspace, and that optimization financial portfolio can be
presented in terms of selection of Class 1 dry or wet landfill. So
short answer is, it's going to be equivalent to what we're doing
now.
MS. HODGSON: And to add to that, if -- a bioreactor is
essentially very similar to an existing landfill except you're
recirculating the liquids within. So you're just enhancing the
breakdown of the composition.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yes.
MS. HODGSON: So that's the short answer, simple of it.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I understand the short
answer. I understand the technology. But you haven't said how
much -- because I saw a picture early in my life as a county
commissioner. There were bioreactors situated around this
landfill -- that landfill. There were bioreactors on the perimeter
somewhere.
DR. YILMAZ: Commissioner, you're right, and then we
purchased Site 305 right west of current landfill. That site
were -- that site was purchased with the intent to look into
visibility of road alignment, Benfield Road alignment, and right
next to current landfill on the west side, identified five to seven
bioreactors to be located; however, the purchased land was
Page 226 of 5415
Page 96
March 4, 2025
repurposed through policy decision-making process to be a sports
complex. So that's why that's not on table here. We continue
to, as our chair indicated, look to the future, not question past and
past policy-making actions by the Board.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: We weren't questioning
it. I just had -- I just had a recollection of it out there
somewhere. Has any consideration been given to the Resource
Recovery Park to the north for the utilization of the bioreactors to
be in that vicinity?
MS. HODGSON: I can answer that. So right now the
PUD for that property does not permit landfilling, and bioreacting
is a type of landfilling. So it is prohibited in the PUD for that
property. Essentially, because after the waste breaks down, you
are then digging it back up, reclaiming it. So for -- all the
activities that take place in a landfill would be the same as a
bioreactor.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I understand. So my
question is, who created the PUD?
MS. HODGSON: So the PUD's history goes back to
two -- I'd have to get back to you on the PUD.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: The short answer is the
Board of County Commissioners created a PUD.
MS. HODGSON: Of course, sir.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Trick question.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Another short
answer -- another short answer for you is is that --
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: He knew the answer. He
was just --
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Excuse me. Another
short answer for you is that which is created by the Board of
Page 227 of 5415
Page 97
March 4, 2025
County Commissioners can and often is adjusted by the Board of
County Commissioners. So don't stay linear, Ms. Engineer, in
your thought processes.
MS. HODGSON: Understood.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner LoCastro.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Yeah. I think the one
question we answered today is -- and you had asked it in the
beginning -- how -- is this important to us? I think you've seen
that it is.
So one of the things that I would say, and I think it goes
without saying, when we have these workshops, you guys should
always have a seat at the table. There's a bunch of things you-all
are doing, a lot of things that you're doing that are really great
and worth spotlighting in a forum like this and not just behind the
scenes.
You've met with us all separately, and you've been able to
show how you've saved citizens money on, you know, garbage
pickup. And it's not district specific. Every citizen in our
district gets their garbage picked up. The awards you've won for
recycling, you know, those are things that shouldn't be glossed
over.
And then the other thing that I think begs having you here
on a regular basis -- and we talked about it a little
bit -- technology's changing so much. So some of the things we
hypothetically talked about here where we go, "Eh, still remains
to be seen," we might be sitting here in three years going, "Man,
they're doing it in Pinellas County," and we just took a trip
there -- we didn't have to go overseas or anything -- and we
discovered some things.
So keeping the commissioners, you know, abreast of what's
Page 228 of 5415
Page 98
March 4, 2025
going on in the technology standpoint, this is why we have these
workshops.
Totally separate things, Action Item 1, if I understand you
correctly, to alleviate confusion and ambiguity, all of Collier
County is now District 1 when it comes to trash pickup, or
whatever -- the solid waste; is that what we're saying?
MS. HODGSON: Yeah. So essentially, it's one solid
waste district. And all the county residents that receive our
service receive the same service. So there's no reason to
differentiate between District 1 and District 2.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: But we're calling it
District 1 or -- okay. We're not calling it that.
MR. DIETCH: Essentially, the MSBUs are still separate
because you have collection contracts that are aligned with those,
but it would create a single solid waste district that has the benefit
units within it.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: And what would
that -- what would that district be called? Nothing specific? No
numbers?
MS. HODGSON: Solid waste district. Yes, no numbers.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Okay. Solid waste
district.
And the reason I say that is I'm always the district that bears
the confusion because FDOT has a District 1, but it's not me. It's
a bigger thing. And so when I saw the chart and it looked like
everything in light blue is now District 1, I was, like, okay, you're
making it better for these guys, worse for me. So you just
answered that question. Because there is that confusion a lot of
times by people in my district. They'll hear FDOT say
something that they're doing in District 1, and they think it's us.
Page 229 of 5415
Page 99
March 4, 2025
And we don't -- you know, we're trying to alleviate. So you're
spot on.
Thank you.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Okay. Commissioner Kowal.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Thank you, Chairman.
I really liked this presentation. It's very informative, and I
really do think this is a very important thing we all need to
discuss and get ahead of. It may not affect us personally, but it
will affect this county and the people that come behind us, and
they'll say, "You know what, thank God these guys thought of
this."
But I did -- in the last couple slides, when you were showing
expansion to the east, the expansion to the two preserve areas,
you actually assigned some numbers to them like the life, you
extend -- one of them says almost 300 years, 298 years of
capacity. But I didn't see anything -- because we discussed
earlier that, you know, moving some of this acreage to the north,
which is a possibility on property we already own. Was there
any studies to what -- how many years that can add or what
portion of that footprint we could use to increase -- because I
know the two little parcels at the bottom doesn't appear to really
add a whole lot, like 20 years or something.
MS. HODGSON: Yeah. I'm going to ask Daniel to also
elaborate on the life of eastward, move it based on the analysis
that was performed, because I think that's important to clarify
the -- how far out the analysis went on that eastern property.
Daniel.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: I'm not so concerned about
the eastern, because we have to buy that. We don't have to buy
what's north.
Page 230 of 5415
Page 100
March 4, 2025
MS. HODGSON: Yeah.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: I'm just curious how much
life we'll add going to the north.
MR. DIETCH: So we have not conducted that analysis.
We don't have the authority to change the PUD.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Go ahead.
MR. DIETCH: But hearing that, if we could --
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: That's why we're here.
MR. DIETCH: Yeah. If we could advance one slide.
There are some planned activities. So the reason that we showed
the previous slide is to show, to identify where yard trash, where
your construction and demolition debris or Class 3 materials are
being sorted on the landfill today. They need to be moved off
the landfill to build out the landfill as it's currently permitted.
And they are designated for placement on the Resource Recovery
Business Park.
And you'll probably notice on the right-hand side, there was
a very large area for disaster debris management. And again,
trying to be forward thinking, what are the kinds of related uses
that support solid waste management and disaster recovery.
Space, it's -- you know, it's constrained, but it's also fungible
within those constraints.
If it is the will, with the exception of the deep injection well,
which is in place, as well as some of the planned other county
activities within the Resource Recovery Business Park, there is
some flexibility, but there are lakes, and maybe the lakes could
be filled in, right?
There's a lot of thought that needs to be -- or a lot of
consideration that needs to be managed to figure out, as was
stated at the prior workshop, how much juice can be squeezed out
Page 231 of 5415
Page 101
March 4, 2025
of that fruit. Because size in this case does matter, not just for
how high you can get -- and it's a point that I did not make on the
southern expansion. Because of the width of those sections, you
can't get to the otherwise permitted height. So that's part of the
reason that it diminishes the value of developing those areas.
So, again, it is not rocket science, but it would benefit us to
have, you know, direction to, "Well, go explore this and report
back to us," which has been the approach that has worked
sufficiently over the last 20-plus years between your professional
staff and the County Commission, because you really shouldn't
leave stones unturned if there might be something beneficial
under.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: That has been a really
thorough and very well-done presentation. I certainly appreciate
it.
Anyone registered to speak? Anybody online or anything?
MR. MILLER: No.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: So we don't have any public
speakers.
Commissioner McDaniel, I see you're lit up again.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: And I already gave
direction to the County Attorney to begin the amendment of the
PUD, just so you know. I would make a recommendation. I
know we can't vote on anything, but it would be my wish --
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Consider it now.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: -- to consider your
recommendations for all three of these action items to be on the
radar plus the other things that this board has talked about today.
The -- and again, optimization of everything doesn't all have to
happen at once. Scalability is an important factor; where we go,
Page 232 of 5415
Page 102
March 4, 2025
how we go, what we do, and so on. So don't take bioreactors out
just because you can't do all eight of them at one shot.
Don't -- so that would be my recommendation, that we go
forward on all three action items along with that.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Maybe we can break this
down into some pieces here, because the Action Item No. 3 is a
pretty broad action item.
Action Items 1 and 2 are -- I think are fairly simple. The
County Attorney would be involved in amending the ordinance
and amending the operating agreement. So I think there
certainly is consensus, I would assume, to have --
COMMISSIONER HALL: Yes.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: -- the staff do that.
Let's talk a little bit more for just a minute about No. 3
because, basically, I think if we just say, "Go do No. 3," that
doesn't really give you a whole lot of direction. Because you've
got every item on here that you would have to look at, and I think
a couple of them are perhaps not worth looking at right away.
So just as an example, Commissioner McDaniel, you
pointed out that expansion to the south you believe would create
some tremendous problems.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: To the east, not to the
south.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: I'm sorry, to the east. I meant
to the east.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I actually like the idea of
the expansion to the south. We'd have to redo some water
management things.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: That's what -- and that's what I
was getting at. I just used the wrong direction. That, you
Page 233 of 5415
Page 103
March 4, 2025
know, let's eliminate -- for our discussion today and direction to
our staff, eliminate the things that we feel right now that are just
not doable, but let's focus on the things that are. So expansion to
the east is a problem, but expansion to the south may be worth
looking at; is that correct?
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: And, you know, maybe
just to simplify it is -- and to the north as well. I mean, just to
simplify it. I don't want to discount going to the east at all,
because we may have an opportunity at some stage to acquire
more land or do something out there. But I think for now, just
modifying the direction to staff that we negotiate with the
expansion of the operations in a cost-feasible manner is a good
enough description. I mean, we can -- we can -- we already own
the land to the south. We already own the land to the north. So
those are the most cost-feasible places that I think we should
focus our energies on right now.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Okay.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Yeah, I agree, because it
just -- it makes sense that -- because those lands, permitting-wise,
too, are much easier that we can acquire, you know, the long
process and arduous process of getting the permitting because
they're already attached to parts of our project anyways,
and -- you know, and it's not costing the taxpayers any more
money to purchase land. And even if we get -- you know, we're
looking -- we're looking at some crazy numbers, 300 years. Like
you said, that's a lot of years. If we can gain 90 years, 100 years
out of this north and south, I mean, that's a step in the right
direction that, you know --
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: By then, new technology
will be available.
Page 234 of 5415
Page 104
March 4, 2025
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Then the other item that we've
discussed is the Immokalee Landfill. And I think it's worthwhile
for staff to look at reclaiming that landfill and maybe even
possibly expanding it. I don't like the thought that we would be
reliant on sending waste out of the county.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Agreed.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Because, regardless, it's our
waste. If something breaks down along the way, you know, if
the landfill we're sending it to closes, we have to have capacity.
So I think adding that, kind of, to the list would be beneficial.
So let us know what that would entail and how much life we can
get out of something like that.
Commissioner LoCastro.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: I think we have to be
careful about the wordage we use when we dismiss you-all from
this table. I understand what's being said here. "Oh, going out
to the east would be problematic, but maybe not south or north."
I think smaller baby steps are, we need analysis on all the
directions. If not, you know what the front page of the paper's
going to say tomorrow? "Collier County Commissioners decide
that moving east is impossible, so they're going to move south."
Okay. I think we'll start to hear from people south that go,
"When did that happen?"
So -- I don't think anybody is saying that, but I think just a
smaller baby step saying, "We know we need to analyze all the
different directions of what makes the most sense." We own
land in certain areas, and just being able to say, you know, we're
not force-feeding something in a certain direction and ruling out a
certain direction.
Commissioner McDaniel's right, there's certain directions
Page 235 of 5415
Page 105
March 4, 2025
that become problematic, but this isn't the meeting to say it's off
the table, and nobody was saying that. But I just wanted to sort
of clarify and say that, you know, one of the homework
assignments here is do the analysis and then, you know, we take a
look and see, "Hey, down the road, what sounds the most feasible
and the reasons why," is what I would say. And we're kind of
saying that, but just wanted to clarify it.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner McDaniel.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: And then just as a point,
Commissioner Saunders, you talked about Action Item No. 3
being maybe a little bit broad, but if we just -- if we just added
the language, "time frame, cost feasibility to secure additional
properties," not just -- and not specify the eastern properties as
direction to our staff, are you okay with Action Item No. 3 if we
changed eastern to add --
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: I just -- my concern was
simply that if we just simply go do your analysis on everything,
we do have some limited capacity to evaluate everything, and
that's --
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Agreed.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: -- all I was trying to get at to
try to get more of a rifle shot as opposed to a, you know, shotgun
shot in terms of coming back to us, because we do have some
time to evaluate things, but...
Commissioner Hall.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Thank you, Chairman.
I think what we're saying is, as far as direction, is we'll keep
our eyes and ears open to new technology to wherever that can
apply, the landfill reclamation, that we're going to look at the
Immokalee Landfill where that concerns, and then the smartest
Page 236 of 5415
Page 106
March 4, 2025
way to expand the existing landfill. We're just kind of
narrowing it down for those three areas. Would that be a fair
assumption?
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: That sounds good to me. Is
that -- everybody sort of concur with that then?
All right. Anything else you need to have from us?
MR. DIETCH: I don't mean to be gratuitous, but I do want
to thank all of you because so often we see that decisions are
made when facing a crisis. You are not in a crisis, and it's really
owed to the hard work that your professional staff have been
doing over the past few decades. So thank you for allocating
this time and entertaining the conversation and providing your
feedback. That gives us clear direction on where we're moving
to.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Thank you. Again, a very
good presentation, so thank you for that.
Ms. Patterson, we have one other item left on our workshop,
but do you have any idea approximately how long that would
take? Is that a one-hour thing or a three-hour thing? What's
your best guess?
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Two more.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: We have two more?
COMMISSIONER HALL: Strategic planning and
ResourceX.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Ah, okay.
MS. PATTERSON: Yes, sir.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Well, the reason I was
asking -- started that discussion is should we break for lunch?
COMMISSIONER HALL: I say yes.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: All right. Everybody sort of
Page 237 of 5415
Page 107
March 4, 2025
agree? All right.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I was not listening to
you. Imagine that.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Do you want to break for
lunch?
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: We're going to take a
break for lunch? Yes.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: This is a big change.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Then how much time do we
need? Now, I brought my lunch, so I'm good with 15 minutes,
but...
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Come back at 1.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: One o'clock, is that enough?
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: One o'clock is fine.
COMMISSIONER HALL: One o'clock is great.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: All right. We will be in
recess until 1 o'clock.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: If you don't mind me
eating on the dais, I'll bring it in here.
(A luncheon recess was had from 12:13 p.m. to 12:59 p.m.)
MS. PATTERSON: Chair, you have a live mic.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: All right. Ms. Patterson, let's
go to the --
Item #2C
STRATEGIC PLANNING - PRESENTED BY MICHAEL NIEMAN
(DIVISION DIRECTOR - STRATEGIC INITIATIVES) AND
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON (DIVISION DIRECTOR -
Page 238 of 5415
Page 108
March 4, 2025
CORPORATE FINANCIAL & MANAGEMENT SERVICES) –
DISCUSSED
MS. PATTERSON: Yes, sir. That brings us to Item 2C
and 2D. It looks like we're going to do a combo here. So we're
going to start out with Item 2C, strategic planning. Is that where
we're starting, Chris?
MR. JOHNSON: Yep.
MS. PATTERSON: All right. Mr. Chris Johnson is going
to be here at the podium presenting, and we have some other
guests at the table. So several people will be participating.
Do you want to go ahead and let them introduce themselves
while we --
MR. JOHNSON: Certainly. I'll start, guys. For the
record, Christopher Johnson, your director of Corporate Financial
and Management Services.
MR. FABIAN: All right. Chris Fabian from Tyler
Technologies, ResourceX, your partner in priority-based
budgeting.
MR. MUNIZ: Commissioners, Jesse Muniz, also with
Tyler Technologies, ResourceX, head of customer success
leading the implementation of this project.
MR. NEIMAN: Good afternoon. Mike Neiman from
Strategic Initiatives, our new division we have. Thank you.
MR. JOHNSON: And we'll start with Mr. Neiman here and
the Collier County strategic plan and priority projects.
MR. NEIMAN: Thanks, Chris.
Before I begin, I want to take this time to thank the Board
for having this topic on the workshop today. This is a very
important item, and it's important that the Board takes ownership
Page 239 of 5415
Page 109
March 4, 2025
of the strategic plan. It's great that you-all are doing that. It
wasn't always the case before, and it's important, and it's -- I want
to give the Board recognition for doing that, and I appreciate that.
I also want to take the time to thank the County Manager for
her support of our division and what we're trying to accomplish
and her leadership in this.
The agenda for today, if you want to go forward, Chris, is
briefly to talk about the current strategic plan. As you can see
behind me, the two. The one on the left is the strategic plan, and
that is what we created as our priority project list. We'll talk
about those individually as we move forward. But just a brief
recap of what we did last year and the recap of what we
accomplished throughout the year as we reported some of these
projects.
Go ahead, Chris, follow through that.
This is the framework we chose. Basically, each year our
division goes through the framework to make sure its current
relevant to the issues we see of the day. We review the current
plan; we evaluate the priorities that we track throughout the year,
which last year was 57 projects; and then we report them
quarterly and publish them on the website.
And then the last box is something that we're working with
Chris Fabian and his team on linking some performance
measurements to the strategy and to the programs that we offer.
I think Chris will talk more about that as he gives his presentation
later. But that's something that Chris Johnson and I have talked
about for a couple years now, and I'm glad that ResourceX is here
to help maybe implement that for us.
This is the framework that we chose two years ago when we
came before you to dramatically change the way we conducted
Page 240 of 5415
Page 110
March 4, 2025
our strategic planning process. At the top you'll see our vision,
mission, and values. They remain constant. We don't -- we're
not asking to change those this years. Same with our focus
areas. Those were the four general topics: The quality of place,
infrastructure, community development, and responsible
governance. And then the objectives are what we map a lot of
our projects to, and those you see in the bullet points underneath
the focus areas.
And then last year we initiated the bottom purple box, which
is the priority projects, that -- we may have gotten a little bit too
aggressive, but we chose 57, which turned out to be a little bit too
much for two people to handle, but -- we will go through those in
a minute, but that's the final piece to the two-page strategic plan.
This is a methodology that I kind of came up with after
experiencing the 57 projects that were a little bit too much, and I
came up with this -- kind of these three objectives. To make the
list for the priority project list, it should have high visibility and
importance to the Board, county staff, and the public. And the
middle one is the important one we found that may not have been
present, which is that there should be measurable work planned
throughout the calendar year on these projects. Many of them
have that; some did not.
And then finally, they should be aligned with what Chris
Fabian and Chris Johnson are trying to do with priority-based
budgeting. And we believe that the ones we chose this year
satisfy all three of those criteria.
Next. You can skip that, Chris.
And here is, again, the current strategic plan and the values
the leads: Leadership, ethics, accountability, dedication, and
service. The vision and mission, that's been with us for quite
Page 241 of 5415
Page 111
March 4, 2025
some time. Again, those things are not proposed to change
moving forward.
Same goes for the four focus areas. We believe those are
still current and relevant and fit with what we're trying to
accomplish. And the objectives, again, still meet the same
interests that we think meet the programs that ResourceX is
trying to focus on and what Chris and budget team are focusing
on. So those are going to be proposed to remain the same.
Now, next is the second page, which is the priority list.
Now, this one, as you can see, is quite extensive. A lot of these
we're going to see in a few minutes proposed to remove from this
list for a variety of reasons. One is completed, so that is
why -- that one we removed. And others will simply be
combined under one heading. So the partnership projects will
continue. We'll still track them but under one heading, not the
separate bullet points you see here.
Same goes with Dr. George's programs in the northeast.
They'll be -- we'll still monitor those programs but do it in one
slide, not seven.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Can I interrupt real
quick, just --
MR. NEIMAN: Yes, sir.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: And I don't mean
to -- well, I am interrupting, so I've already done it. I hate that
when people -- "I don't mean to interrupt," but -- well, you
already have.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: I'm about to.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Are these the 57 projects
that -- or projects that you picked last year --
MR. NEIMAN: Yes, sir.
Page 242 of 5415
Page 112
March 4, 2025
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: -- to be priorities?
MR. NEIMAN: Yes, sir. And we tracked them each
quarter. In the backup there is a copy of our last -- I believe out
last quarterly report, which indicates the updates for the particular
projects. And an example is the aquatics program. We tracked
Sun-N-Fun so that we have the most recent updates up to last
quarter on what they were doing.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: It wasn't even open, so
there was nothing to track.
MR. NEIMAN: It was tracking the development, sir, of
Mr. DeLony. But, yeah. So there -- but a lot of these didn't
have updates, and that's kind of why we're going to pare this
down maybe to 25.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: And I'm not -- I
don't -- I'm not trying to tell you how to do your job, but isn't this
supposed to be more of a divisional departmental tracking thing?
Couldn't that be dished off to those individual departments so that
you became more -- as opposed to limiting your scope -- because
I love what you're doing. But as opposed to limiting your scope,
couldn't we -- couldn't we push these to the individual
departments for -- with a written decree or a written list of dos
and don'ts and reporting times and so ons and so forth so that you
became -- your department became more of a checks and
balance, if you will, so that when Sun-N-Fun's off project or
Trinity's not getting a road built in time or something along those
lines.
MR. NEIMAN: Well, they're doing it currently. What we
chose to do is highlight some high-level projects for public
consumption, so it's always on the website. Because I found that
a few years ago when I came back, that a lot of these projects
Page 243 of 5415
Page 113
March 4, 2025
you-all were asking for updates every meeting. And so I
thought, wouldn't it be a good idea to put this somewhere where
we're tracking them on a regular basis, so if you wanted an
update, you potentially could look on the website and kind of see
in a general form.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: The public could look at
the website?
MR. NEIMAN: Absolutely. So it was kind of an
education in transparency attempt.
But, yeah -- no, division's still -- the ones that we are
removing or asking to remove are going to be tracked by the
divisions themselves in their own method.
Go ahead, Chris.
This just discusses how we evaluate each of these
throughout the year, and then in December, go through and make
sure that we're ready for this workshop and whether or not we
want to make substantive changes.
But let me go back. The intent of the strategic plan itself,
on the first page was to be a three- to five-year document. And
we're beginning Year 3 of that current iteration, so I think it's still
relevant. So I don't expect to make any changes for the next few
years. But again, the next slide will show how we mapped.
That's the corner -- the bottom left corner is a copy of the table
that we issue each quarter, and in that table it will have the
priority, the department, the alignment with a strategic plan focus
area, a description of what is going to be accomplished for that
priority, and then finally the farthest right column is the update,
and it will give the update each quarter as to what the staff is
doing on that particular project.
And ultimately, we -- I guess on the right you'll see the
Page 244 of 5415
Page 114
March 4, 2025
annual report. We kind of tied that with our life cycle of
strategic planning, and then, essentially at the end of the year, we
wrote an updated annual report that highlighted on the
accomplishments of the county staff, and so that is another area
of how we kind of circled the wagon on that.
Okay. Chris.
Yeah. This just indicates that we tracked the progress of
the 57 projects on a quarterly basis. We summarized the results
and then published the report each quarter on the website for
transparency and visibility. In doing so, when I would evaluate
the reports each quarter, things became clear that there were
some projects that had some flaws in our tracking, and it
was -- and it would have been my fault, not staff's fault, because I
think we went too big on some of them. So sometimes the scope
was too big. Sometimes there were some outside resources that
were holding projects up so there were no real updates because of
either FDOT or other federal agencies that were involved.
And some of the projects that were broken into multiple
phases, then it became kind of a headache for us. And some of
the projects were more operational in nature, which belonged in
the divisions. It shouldn't -- it didn't deserve the tracking that we
were doing at this high level.
And then the final one was the one that caught my attention
was that some of these just didn't have meaningful work to report.
So we were just saying "no updates" each quarter. So we
figured if there are going to be no updates, we may as well
remove them from the list.
Which leads to the last bullet point, which is our focus going
forward in 2025 is to reduce the number only for those critical
achievable priorities for the current year, and we tracked them in
Page 245 of 5415
Page 115
March 4, 2025
a calendar year, not fiscal year.
And these are the proposed changes moving forward for this
year. Again, no proposed changes to the actual strategic plan
itself, the focus areas or objectives. Only you'll see in a minute
that visual appearance is a little bit different, and that was done to
kind of coincide with the rebranding efforts of our
communications division. So no changes to those areas.
And the next one, Chris.
That's what that would look like. That is the proposed new
strategic plan that we would publish.
And then if you want to go back real quick, Chris, to the one
before.
And then we proposed to remove that 57 number to 25.
Twenty-four of those would be simply removed for the reasons
we discussed earlier, and 11 of them would be combined into
three existing priority projects. So those 11 wouldn't go away;
they would simply just roll up under another one.
Go ahead. And so that would be it. And this would be the
proposed second page. The life cycle, it looks a little bit
different, which kind of tells us what we do each quarter in the
life cycle of strategic planning and -- but the priorities would fall
underneath those headings. And I think there are 25 there. But,
of course, we're open to the Board to add or subtract from that list
here today if there are any other -- something we may have
missed. But that is the proposed strategic plan for next year -- or
this year, actually.
Go ahead, Chris. Thanks.
And that's just a list of ones we're removing, and there's a
variety of reasons as to why. Those -- a lot of those are
real -- still real priorities. They made more sense to live in the
Page 246 of 5415
Page 116
March 4, 2025
divisions or departments who own them, and some of them are
more, again, operational. The asset management plan's very
important; we're doing this every day. But it's something that we
felt, after discussing with the County Manager, that it shouldn't
make this particular list.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner Hall.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Thank you, Chairman.
So, Mike, as I'm looking at this, you know -- and I do, I get
it, the scope needs to shrink a little bit. But in keeping balance
between what is too much versus what is manageable --
MR. NEIMAN: Yeah.
COMMISSIONER HALL: -- I would like to see that in
these determinations that business as usual is challenged.
MR. NEIMAN: Right.
COMMISSIONER HALL: I don't want to make these
determinations based on just business as usual. Well, we
couldn't get this done in this amount of time in the past, so we're
going to go ahead and just put that off. I just would like to see
that -- you know, with division leaders and stuff, like that, I'd like
to see that challenged as well as made manageable, if that makes
any sense at all.
MR. NEIMAN: It did. It certainly did.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Okay.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Maybe to you.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: I mean, there are some
big things on here that -- you know, and when you use the word
"removed," you know, people that see slides that aren't sitting in
this briefing right now that will go, "Wow, they're not going to
even focus on that," you know. So, you know, maybe the
wordage could be better. It's not like you're going to ignore
Page 247 of 5415
Page 117
March 4, 2025
these things, but you're trying to skinny down to the things you're
going to do a deep dive into, but we're not ignoring these things.
There's some -- there's some pretty meaty ones on here, but -- you
know. I know we can do anything, can't do everything, but...
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: And if I can clarify,
they're not being removed from our strategic focus. They're --
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Right.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: -- just being removed
from your strategic focus necessarily. They're still being
necessarily attended to. We're not -- we're not going to give up
on affordable housing.
MR. NEIMAN: Of course not.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I mean -- but it's not
going to be something that your department is going to --
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: That clarity should be on
there, though, because this is a Collier County slide. Bottom
right, you know, the logo says "Collier County." So if
somebody got these slides and had no benefit of this briefing and
got them in the mail or just saw them posted online --
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Right.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: -- or watched this without
the -- without the audio, it would be, you know, front-page news.
So there might be just some better verbiage to explain what we're
really focusing on here.
MR. NEIMAN: Understood.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: "Redirected priorities."
Because you're going to be able to shift those back to the
individual departments we have. We have a housing department
that can help and oversee with that. We're not -- we're not
removing affordable housing as a priority. We're just -- it's
Page 248 of 5415
Page 118
March 4, 2025
redirected back to the department where it needs to be living.
I'm using that as the example because it's the first one.
MR. NEIMAN: Right.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Beach parking is another.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Or I would say -- you
know, I mean, we're just at a workshop here. We're talking.
But you have the priorities you're focused on, but then these
could be county focus areas, so it's not -- you're not doing a deep
dive into this, but you're keeping them on our list. But just the
word "removed" on a county slide is dangerous, especially when
that's not the intention.
MR. NEIMAN: Yeah.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: All right.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Department in-house
priorities.
MR. NEIMAN: Next, Chris. I think we're wrapping it up
here. That's -- you can skip that one. That's the proposed
combination.
And then briefly, you know, our role with priority-based
budgeting is that we believe we have to make sure that the plan
itself is aligned with what they're trying to do and accomplish, so
our team is working with ResourceX on the next phases of their
implementation of priority-based budgeting. And so it simply
reflects that we are mindful of that, and everything that we do is
tied to what they're trying to accomplish as well.
And I think lastly should be the next steps. And the next
steps is to take the feedback from you-all today to finalize this set
of priority projects moving forward to present that list to you for
approval in a few meetings from now, and then the last one is,
again, to establish a framework to initiate some performance
Page 249 of 5415
Page 119
March 4, 2025
measurements or metrics working with Chris Fabian and his team
from ResourceX. And those are our next steps. That should be
it.
MR. JOHNSON: That's it.
MR. NEIMAN: That's it. Any questions or comments?
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: You know, let me ask you a
question, because I'm a little dense here and I'm missing
something. These removed priorities are not really removed
priorities, but they're going to be placed somewhere else.
MR. NEIMAN: Correct.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: And you're removing them
because 57, or whatever that number was, was a fairly large
number.
MR. NEIMAN: Yep.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: But I'm not sure I understand
that.
MR. NEIMAN: It wasn't -- that may be the focus. It was a
lot of it didn't have the meaningful updates each quarter. So
when we were tracking these, for whatever reason, there was a
gap in what staff was working on, so it became -- the intent was
to provide a quarterly report on the progress on these reports.
And we found that some of them we were having no updates, and
some were removed for that reason. Other -- the majority of
them are asked to be shifted back to the divisions because they
were more operational. They weren't projects, per se. The asset
management plans and some of the other HR functions were
something that we felt didn't belong on this particular list.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: So on your list that you're
going to keep, could you have a line and then say, "Priorities
shifted to the departments," and then list -- just put these, and that
Page 250 of 5415
Page 120
March 4, 2025
solves the problem of them being removed.
MR. NEIMAN: Absolutely.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Okay.
MR. JOHNSON: Anything else on this, gentlemen, before
we move on to the inside update from ResourceX on the
priority-based budgeting? All right.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I did.
MR. JOHNSON: Oh, sorry.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner McDaniel.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Just -- and this -- and this
maybe is what we just got done saying, but on the slide right
before the next steps, or the -- is, you know, the combined
priority. Maybe the next slide up. Those. Right there. I was
looking at those, and those are almost operational things that
could be -- you know, Dr. George and his department does a
wonderful job with our utilities. It's an enterprise fund. Same
with stormwater. It's necessarily under one house. We're
not -- we're not -- are these proposed changes to add in for 25 or
being redirected?
MR. NEIMAN: These combined -- we tracked these last
year, and they were great updates. We felt that the different
phases should be just merged into one "water resources" heading
but keep track in our table -- we would differentiate in the table,
you know, Phase 1, Phase 2, tanks, pump station. And it would
be in the table itself.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Thank you for that
clarification.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Mr. Johnson.
MR. JOHNSON: All right. Thank you, Mike.
MR. NEIMAN: Thanks.
Page 251 of 5415
Page 121
March 4, 2025
MR. JOHNSON: All right. I've just got to pull up my
slides here. Give me one second. It's moving on its own.
Item #2D
BUDGET/ RESOURCE X - PRESENTED BY CHRIS FABIAN
(TYLER TECHNOLOGIES) AND JESSE MUNIZ (TYLER
TECHNOLOGIES) – DISCUSSED
MR. JOHNSON: All right. Commissioners, again, Chris
Johnson, your director of OMB, for the record.
Today we're going to go through -- it's kind of exciting. It's
been about a year since we started ResourceX. And I know
we've -- this summer we went through a few of -- the ROI report
and these program insights. Today we're going to give you an
update on ResourceX program insights and kind of what the
departments in the county have accomplished to date, what we're
looking at in the future. And I'll just start by kind of going
through an overview, and then we'll go through the implemented
insights that have already been implemented, we'll go to the
in-process opportunities that we're working through, and then a
few additional opportunities that are also kind of in the works or
on the horizon.
Just to kind of orient us here, I'm going to quickly go over
an overview. We received the draft report -- sorry -- the draft
return on investment report in July of 2024. From there,
we -- the report contained 381 programs that were included and
kind of analyzed. Of those programs, 957 insights and example
case studies came out of that.
During your summer regular board meetings, we had a
Page 252 of 5415
Page 122
March 4, 2025
couple meetings where we talked about some of the insights we
were going to look into and where we were going to head with
that expansive list of insights.
So the insights included multiple different types. We had
in-sourcing insights, revenue generation insights, grant
opportunities, efficiency insights, and partnership insights.
That's kind of background on the insights.
So the first thing I wanted to go through was kind of some
of the implemented insights that we've accomplished in the time
since we started this about a year ago.
So this is a summary, and I have individual slides on all
these that we can go through briefly, but I just wanted to give you
guys the overall view of what has been implemented. The total
there is about $37.3 million. We go down here, we have our
workforce prioritization pool. We have grants for Palm River
and Naples Park. PUD financial operations has adjusted user
fees, impact fees, and implemented the charges for the credit
cards on their end.
TMSD, road and bridge, Trinity's area, they've adjusted the
mulch they're using, the inefficiency there.
Landscape maintenance contracts have been rebid. They're
still in the process of being rebid. This has allowed for some
redirection of ad valorem dollars there.
Irrigation controllers and IQ water. We've updated
irrigation controllers to control irrigation flows and switched over
a few of our medians -- actually, I think it was substantial, and
we'll get into that in the slide -- to IQ water instead of regular
potable water.
That CAT -- the CAT buses, we've updated the data plan,
which resulted in a savings of about $19,000. Pollution control
Page 253 of 5415
Page 123
March 4, 2025
has updated their fee schedule.
The Airport Authority has also updated their fee schedule.
Within the stormwater maintenance area, we received a
legislative appropriation for an aquatic weed harvester. That
was about $116,000.
In the Facilities and CRAs department, we've received a
grant for additional land purchase for a stormwater project to the
tune of a million dollars.
And finally, in our Growth Management and Community
Development area, they also updated their fee schedule, and the
expected revenue for this year based on early projections is
$4.9 million.
So I'm going to go through a couple of these in a little bit
more detail. So overall, this will kind of tie into -- the first slide
here's on the countywide reorganization, and this will -- this will
kind of tie into the workforce prioritization pool.
As you see here, some of the organizational changes we've
streamlined the management structure. We've merged Real
Property with Right-of-Way under Transportation. We've
centralized financial operations under my division for a few of
the areas that had individual financial -- financial staff. We've
pulled them under an umbrella. We've centralized grants under
Transportation and CHS. Transportation is handling our
infrastructure grants, and CHS is handling our programmatic
grants.
We've created the Strategic Initiatives division, which is
Mike's division. Facilities in the CRAs have combined. Fleet
has gone under the CBO, putting all of our internal services under
the CBO umbrella now. And we've also consolidated
Transportation's capital projects under the Transportation
Page 254 of 5415
Page 124
March 4, 2025
Engineering section.
Any questions on that from anybody?
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: CBO.
MR. JOHNSON: Sorry. Corporate business operations.
Too many three letter words, right?
All right. Now, what has this -- what has this
reorganization done? You can see here this is the workforce
prioritization pool. We're all familiar with this. The projected
savings are about 2.6 million for this year within this pool.
Over on the left-hand side there you can see we've included
a Deputy County Manager within that pool, department head, two
division directors, four managers, four supervisors, and 19 other
nonmanagement positions that are currently sitting in there.
Now, throughout the year, we will obviously be diving in there
for a strategic alignment with what we're doing with positions,
but I think so far this year we've had one out and one in, so it's
been a net zero change within -- within that actual cost center.
Because we've organized these as their own individual cost
centers.
Any questions on the workforce prioritization pool?
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: No one's lit up, so...
MR. JOHNSON: All right. I'll just keep on moving on
then.
Public Utilities Engineering Department, they've received
$10.5 million in grants this year. Three million for Palm River
septic-to-sewer conversion, 4.5 million for Naples Park, and
another 3 million for the Palm River Areas 3, 5 and 6. And
you'll see another number there that kind of comes in a future
summary here. They've applied for additional grant revenue of
about $28.9 million.
Page 255 of 5415
Page 125
March 4, 2025
Financial planning under Public Utilities, again, they've
updated their user fees, their impact fees, and they've
implemented that credit card processing fee for the customers.
The total projected additional revenue on that is $16.5 million.
The majority of that is attributable to the user fee updates.
Landscape beautification, we just briefly went over this, but
overall savings of 98,000 in '24, 35,000 so far this year, and I
believe that was just the color of the mulch that we changed from
our own -- if I'm correct there, Trinity -- from our own special to
cocoa brown. So there's an efficiency there.
Landscape beautification, again, we increased bid
competition, put all the landscape contracts out on the street to
rebid with basic services, and we're bidding separate irrigation
pump services and, again, mulching contracts. So that has
allowed us to reallocate approximately a million dollars to date.
Irrigation, this is the control systems with Motorola smart
controllers. The 122 miles of irrigation now go through radio
control towers to allow us to monitor them. In addition, as I
spoke upon earlier, 70 miles of irrigation have been switched
over to reclaim irrigation water, which is a significant cost
savings.
CAT buses, again, this is the WiFi access. Staff looked at
the contracts and updated to a more reasonable plan, saving
$19,000 a year.
Pollution control, as you know, this is one of your ad
valorem funds. By updating the fee model, they're projecting
162,000 in additional revenue annually to offset ad valorem.
Airports, again, they updated their fee schedule, CPI
increases on aeronautical land leases, monthly vehicle parking
and storage fees, increased minimal fuel purchases required to
Page 256 of 5415
Page 126
March 4, 2025
waive fees. Tie-down overnight parking fees increased
and -- increased for after-hours services. Again, they also
looked at their fuel pricing methodology and administrative
recovery costs. This is generating an additional $65,000
annually.
And this is the Weedoo. This things looks pretty cool. Is
that what's it's called? The Weedoo or the weed harvester?
MS. PATTERSON: Weedoo. It's an aqua harvester.
MR. JOHNSON: Weedoo, Weedoo. It looks kind of fun
to drive, but this was a legislative appropriation for 115-,
$116,000 to mechanically harvest weeds within our canals, which
again, this is a pilot, could -- moving forward, it could lead to
additional savings because we do spray in our canals, and this
may be more cost effective and potentially environmentally
friendly.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Is there any way for us to
track that? Because we all know intuitively those are wonderful
things, and we're not putting pesticides in our water and our
groundwater. Is there any way to track those intuitive potential
savings, or just watch it, how it goes?
MR. JOHNSON: I can tell you, we can -- we can definitely
track the -- what are we doing with the Weedoo costs, because
we have asset management that we're using work
orders -- compared to the spraying. As far as environmental
effects, I'd have to talk to someone in pollution.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Can that Weedoo pull up
seagrass?
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Quit. Thou shalt not
touch seagrass, remember.
MR. JOHNSON: Any other questions on the aquatic weed
Page 257 of 5415
Page 127
March 4, 2025
harvester?
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: I just have a quick one.
Chris, did we buy this or lease this?
MR. JOHNSON: We bought it.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: We bought it.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: It was with a grant.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Grant money.
MR. JOHNSON: Yep. So it was -- I believe it was
100 percent covered.
COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: I mean, you've got here
"apply for state grant," but we got the grant money.
MR. JOHNSON: Yes, we did, and we purchased it with
that.
All right. The next one is for the CRA, Bayshore CRA, a
million dollar grant for land acquisition, which I believe the plan
is to utilize that for a purchase of property to expand stormwater
pond capacity in the district.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Wonderful.
MR. JOHNSON: And this is for Growth Management and
Community Development. As you know, on -- I believe it was
last June. Right down there, yep -- June 25th, 2024, the Board
approved their updated fee schedule. That is estimated to
generate an additional $4.9 million in revenue in '25.
The -- there is currently a study as well moving forward to
right-size these fees further. This included additions for things
we weren't charging for, like a new FEMA review fee, and also
fees for permit extensions, et cetera.
Any questions on any of those at all?
(No response.)
MR. JOHNSON: That concludes the already implemented
Page 258 of 5415
Page 128
March 4, 2025
insights. You guys --
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner Hall has some
comments or questions.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Thank you, Chairman.
Chris, I get it, you know, where we're implementing the
efficiencies and the insights. Those are permanent and those are
predictable, but the grants -- you know, in that 37 million, I think
the grants were a little over maybe 12 million, and those are
temporal with the exception of we get to keep the asset for the
Weedoo.
MR. JOHNSON: Correct.
COMMISSIONER HALL: But that's small potatoes
compared to the rest of it. But those grants are -- they're
nonpredictable and they're temporal. And I'm hoping that as we
get in the end process opportunities we're going to get to -- get to
the real meat of what's predictable and what's permanent. Don't
let me down, Chris.
MR. JOHNSON: I'm diving in right now. I'm diving in
right now. So the next step is our in-process opportunities.
Here's the list on these. And I mean, if the Board likes, I can go
through them slide by slide, or I can just kind of summarize them
on this slide for you.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: What's the preference of the
Board? You want to just hear the summaries or --
COMMISSIONER HALL: Just the summaries.
MR. JOHNSON: Okay. So, again, the -- I kind of pointed
out on the additional -- on the additional -- the initial, sorry, PUD
slide, the -- that the department has applied for an additional
28.9 million in grants. That includes 25 million for the Golden
Gate wastewater plant and a pump station as well and a
Page 259 of 5415
Page 129
March 4, 2025
septic-to-sewer conversion.
CHS is looking at implementing fees for affordable housing
monitoring. That could produce an additional $250,000 in
revenue. The CRAs are looking at partnerships for their holiday
decorations, getting sponsors for that. That has the potential to
offset about $20,000.
Strategic initiatives, libraries looking at fee schedule,
nonresident and program fee schedules; that could introduce
additional revenue of about $150,000.
Human resources is partnering with the universities for
professional development. That has the potential to save about
$150,000.
Stormwater, we're looking at the potential for a specific
stormwater fee and/or revenue source. Current -- the current
budget policy for moving into '26 is allocating about
$20.5 million from ad valorem revenue for that purpose. So
looking into those additional revenue sources to fund that is on
the horizon.
CAT, they're looking at potentially advertising on our
fixed-route buses. That has the potential to raise us a million
dollars a year.
Again, another grant with engineering. A lot of these
grants go to our roads which, Commissioner, we do -- we do
keep -- again, get to use, but again, there is upkeep associated
with those in maintenance. But looking at CIGP trip grants for
Pine Ridge and Santa Barbara widening, that's to the tune of $12
million. SCOP grants for Immokalee Road widening and a few
improvements out east, 1.2 million -- I'm sorry -- 1.9 million.
This one I know the Board -- I believe it was two years ago
during the budget cycle we discussed Immokalee Road and the
Page 260 of 5415
Page 130
March 4, 2025
Immokalee Road corridor, and we put into our five-year plan
$40 million to try to move forward with the Immokalee
interchange.
Through a partnership with FDOT -- I know Trinity's been
working really hard on that. FDOT has moved that up into their
plan, and they're also planning on providing us an additional
$2 million for utility relocations, and that has a -- that partnership
has a value of about $55.7 million.
Looking at Facilities, they also are looking at -- I'm sorry.
Parks and Recreation, they're also looking at their fee
schedule with the potential to update and right-size fees for their
sports facilities and other facilities. That has the potential for
$250,000 in additional revenue.
And then within Growth Management, they're also looking
at expedited site plan review fees with the potential of $75,000
and then transferring the cost of some of these community studies
onto the area that the studies affect, which has the potential for a
million dollars in additional revenue.
And finally, we have DAS strategic partnerships through
animal welfare vets and other organizations with the potential to
raise about $1.5 million.
So I'm not sure if that answered your question,
Commissioner Hall, but these are a lot of the insights that are
currently in process that we're working towards.
COMMISSIONER HALL: You danced at it. That doesn't
quite get to where I want to get to, but I understand the process.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Mr. Chair?
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner McDaniel.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yes. And just on a
couple of notes as we're going through here. When are we going
Page 261 of 5415
Page 131
March 4, 2025
to have a more broadened discussion on the stormwater revenue?
MR. JOHNSON: You're talking the stormwater utility
potentially or revenue?
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yes.
MR. JOHNSON: I believe that's in -- that the plan for that
is to start looking at that at the end of this year, like -- am I right,
Trinity? -- with the potential implementation in '27, for FY '27.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Okay. I thought it was
determined, and then under -- and that isn't okay. I'd rather we
talk about it sooner than '27. But I mean, it's okay if that's what
we're going to do, but I think if it's implemented properly, that we
don't have to wait till '27. We can effectuate a very subjective
adjustment in how we're utilizing our ad valorem money with
a -- with a ramp-up on that -- on that utility fee, so -- but my -- as
far as advertising on the CAT bus, I thought we decided some
time ago that we really couldn't do that without opening
Pandora's box to allow anybody to advertise.
MR. JOHNSON: I'm going to look to Trinity on this. I
don't know the specifics.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Trinity's coming. And
while Trinity's coming -- don't go away, Chris. And while she's
coming up, what's CIGP, SCOP? I know what FDOT stands for.
But what do those other two stand for?
MR. JOHNSON: She can answer those questions for you
as well.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Okay.
MS. SCOTT: CIGP is County Incentive Grant Program.
It's a special grant program through a discretionary grant program
through the Florida Department of Transportation, and SCOP is
Small County Outreach Program, which is a program that allows
Page 262 of 5415
Page 132
March 4, 2025
us to add paved shoulders specifically within the Immokalee area.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: We've been doing that
already, haven't we?
MS. SCOTT: We put in for these grant programs. We
utilize our five-year program as the basis. So actually, what
we're doing is offsetting things that we already have programmed
within our five-year program.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Okay. Thank you.
MS. SCOTT: And with regard to CAT advertising, it is
something that we've been working through the County
Attorney's Office. You're correct, it is a very difficult item to
move forward with. There has been some recent litigation in a
county to the north of us, and we're kind of waiting to see how
that all plays out to determine if we're going to be bringing that
back. But it is still something that we want to keep on the radar
that if we can make something work, that we would want to bring
that to the Board to give that opportunity.
MR. KLATZKOW: You cannot regulate content, so the
concern was always, on a bus, for, like, an abortion sign or
whatever, and that's why we've always -- when we do
advertising, we tend to do it inside so that the public doesn't see
it. But it's a content management issue.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Right. And we had a
fairly lengthy presentation on that, Commissioner Saunders, you
may recall better than I, but it just became extremely complicated
because we lifted the lid on Pandora's box, and once we started,
we really couldn't prohibit anybody unless -- unless it was just
absolutely vulgar.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: We just decided not to do it.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: And so we decided not to
Page 263 of 5415
Page 133
March 4, 2025
do it.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: We could always take another
look at it, but that was --
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Absolutely. And before
you go away -- and I wanted to add -- I wanted to touch on the
diverging diamond at Immokalee Road. Didn't we get a report at
the MPO that the DOT, through their value engineering on the
Moving Florida Initiative, is going to pick up that interchange
improvements at 75?
MS. SCOTT: That's exactly what Chris was saying. In
our five-year program, we had allocated $40 million towards that,
but Florida Department of Transportation is going to foot that bill
now, so the Board of County Commissioners and the taxpayers of
Collier County will not be.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Just for a little clarification,
because Ms. Scott directed us in this. By putting it in our
program and funding it, Ms. Scott was of the opinion that by
doing that we would ultimately be able to get the FDOT to pick it
up. So that was a strategic plan on your part that worked out.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Outstanding.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Too bad you don't get 10
percent of the --
MS. SCOTT: Listen, I was in the back with my calculator
out, Commissioner McDaniel, 10 percent.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yeah. I'd be happy to do
that if somebody would make the motion.
And, Chris, if you would, just as one last point, for future
reference, I'd like to see timelines on these estimates of
reallocation and things that are in process, when you expect to
see them, and then -- so we have track-ability when we're looking
Page 264 of 5415
Page 134
March 4, 2025
into the future as to whether or not we choose to advertise on the
buses, what we -- on the CAT transport, whether or not we do
that and whether or not we've received enough revenue to make it
worthwhile, so on and so forth, on all of these, just -- because
this -- when Commissioner Hall looks at these things, it's already
supposed to have happened. And it's -- yeah, exactly.
MR. JOHNSON: That was the first section, these ones.
And if I may, Commissioner, we'll provide the commissioners
with the full deck. They do have implementation timelines on
the slides.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Okay.
MR. JOHNSON: It's just not in the summary table. It was
getting too small when I included everything in it, and I -- you
know, hard to read on a prompter, so...
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner Kowal.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Thank you, Chairman.
Yeah. I know when we had started this a little over a year
and a half ago, a year ago --
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Two.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: -- with ResourceX and
moving forward, and I think initially our game plan was to take
this deep dive and find all this fat and, you know, this, this, and
that to cut. And, I mean, I'm even looking at some of this
in-process opportunities summary, and if you really break it
down, I mean, our whole idea was to save taxpayers money and
have the government run more efficient, streamline.
And even if you look at these numbers, when you take the
seven -- or revenue programs, so basically we're just charging the
citizens to use these programs. So that's about $25 million. So
that's still a tax. Grants, $44 million worth of grants. Those are
Page 265 of 5415
Page 135
March 4, 2025
still taxes, right?
MR. JOHNSON: (Nods head.)
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Fifty-five million from the
state for Move Florida Forward, those are taxes, right?
MR. JOHNSON: (Nods head.)
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: So we're well over that
number, half of what we were talking about savings. And then, I
mean, in reality -- I mean, are we just getting to the point where
we're not -- we're not as fat as we thought we were in the way we
operate, or are we just reaching for things to say, well, this
is -- you know, these are -- this is what we're saving, but in reality
we're just --
MR. JOHNSON: Well -- and if I may, Commissioner --
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: It's all coming from the same
source, right?
MR. JOHNSON: Theoretically, the way you're saying that,
grants are tax dollars that go up to the federal government -- or
the state, they come back down.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Tax dollars. Government
doesn't create their own money.
MR. JOHNSON: Revenues are generated for specific
programs. What I will say is --
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Fees, right?
MR. JOHNSON: Through fees, correct; for the actual users
of it instead of being a tax where --
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Everybody uses their water.
MR. JOHNSON: Yes, exactly. But the people who
actually use it get paid [sic], you know, based on their usage.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Stormwater.
MR. JOHNSON: Yeah, whereas a tax --
Page 266 of 5415
Page 136
March 4, 2025
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Indirectly, everybody uses it.
MR. JOHNSON: Indirectly, correct.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Indirectly.
MR. JOHNSON: I will just point out again -- and I know I
brought this up last Tuesday, but with the reduction in the millage
rate, we have saved our local taxpayers $152 million over the last
two years.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Oh, I agree with you.
MR. JOHNSON: So when you ask about the -- where
we -- how close we are to the bone, keep in mind that when
we -- when we do that, we are now operating more lean. I mean
$152 [sic] a year.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: I'm not saying you aren't.
What I'm saying is we've come into a reality. We've come into a
point where ResourceX and the work you guys are doing in
saying that -- you know, reality, we weren't wasting as much
money as we thought we were or vice versa. Because, you
know, there's not, like, real, like, this big, like, hidden thing that
we discovered that we were, you know, like --
MR. JOHNSON: Well -- and to your point, I think there's
always room to continue to evaluate, look at our programs, look
at our process, make --
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: No, I think the process is
great.
MR. JOHNSON: -- them more efficient. And you're
actually going to give me a great segue right here to Mr. Fabian
to talk about -- talk about what our next steps are with
ResourceX, and it does involve looking now -- now we have
program data -- looking at process data. And I'll -- with that, I
can turn it over to him, or if you guys still have some more
Page 267 of 5415
Page 137
March 4, 2025
questions.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: I've got a few more
commissioners. Commissioner Hall.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Thank you, Chairman.
Tell me how the stormwater thing works. I'm brain dead on
that right now. Are we going to charge for stormwater?
MS. PATTERSON: This is an old wound. So we have the
ability, via Florida Statute, to charge what is called a -- oh, it's a
special assessment relative to stormwater. In order to do it,
there's a statutory process that we have to go through to establish
the fees, and it measures -- in part, it's tied to the actual amount of
stormwater discharge created by individual properties.
So the test for a special assessment's even higher than the
test for, like, an impact fee or other fees because it has to directly
benefit the fee payer.
So the last round of stormwater utility, we actually evaluated
every parcel in Collier County, unincorporated county, to look at
their impervious area and calculate that stormwater discharge.
There are some complexities because of managed systems,
so modern stormwater development versus some of the old
stormwater systems that we have, how you give credits for
people that have private systems that they maintain them. But
essentially, it looks at establishing a fee for us to not only do
maintenance but also for -- stormwater maintenance, also for us
to provide for those capital projects.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner Hall, just so
you know, we're a long, long way from any kind of a stormwater
user fee. We unanimously rejected it the last time it came before
the Board several years ago, and so it's going to be a tough road
to hoe. And I know Commissioner McDaniel is committed to it,
Page 268 of 5415
Page 138
March 4, 2025
but we'll look forward to seeing the details when you have them.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Commissioner McDaniel
killed the last one, so and we have --
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: I think it was a unanimous
kill. I'm not so sure that it was --
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yeah.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: But anyway --
COMMISSIONER HALL: I'm not finished yet.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: It was a unanimous kill.
COMMISSIONER HALL: So I understand it, but we're
still focusing on all of this. We're still focusing on creative ways
to increase our revenue. We're moving dollars around and
calling it victory. Whether it's taxing the people, whether it's
getting grants from the government or whatever it is, it's still not
focused on -- what I want to get to is what Commissioner Kowal
was saying. I want to get to the fat, to the inefficiencies, to
the -- to the -- to where we're operating as big government when
we can operate as a smaller government entity. Whether we can
get there or not, but that's the direction that I want to see us
taking, and I haven't seen that so far. I'm being patient, but I'm
not -- plain talk is the easiest understood.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner McDaniel.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yeah, and he jumped to a
new slide. The comment that I had to make was these
propositions are what ResourceX -- a portion, I believe, of what
ResourceX talked to us about on their first report. And I kind of
chided you, Chris, a little bit, because I know that reallocation
means cutting. Something is getting cut when you're moving
money from here when you're reallocating.
And so reallocating, bringing in additional grant monies,
Page 269 of 5415
Page 139
March 4, 2025
alternative sources from other agencies, yes, they are tax money,
but at the same time we're freeing up available ad valorem that
we have that we had put forth, as Commissioner Saunders
pointed out on the diverging diamond at Immokalee Road. We
had appropriated in our five-year plan to budget for that. The
DOT saw our willingness to participate and stepped up and
grabbed onto it and saw the need for it, and that allows us to
reallocate previously committed funds back into other necessary
infrastructure and capital projects that we direly need, so -- and
having a timeline will help us a lot as we're -- and maybe help
Commissioner Hall. I don't know if we can or not, but --
COMMISSIONER HALL: No, no. I mean -- excuse me
for jumping in there. But I'm all about -- I'm good with what
we're doing --
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yep.
COMMISSIONER HALL: -- but I just don't want to see it
be all that we do. That's where I'm being patient.
MR. JOHNSON: And I appreciate that input. I just
wanted to show you guys one more slide before I turn it over to
Chris, and this is just the additional opportunities that we're kind
of looking at, and some of these are the efficiencies that I believe
that you're speaking to, Commissioner Hall. The Transportation
area's looking at updating their pavement inspection model
utilizing technology to more efficiently work on our repaving
programs.
We're also looking at the potential of organizing tourism on
the promotional side as a CVB under a 501(c)(6). That may
be -- that may be a better way to do that, provide some efficiency
and some taxpayer savings.
And Utilities, they're working on a pilot to implement AMI
Page 270 of 5415
Page 140
March 4, 2025
meter reading. Now, that reads the meters from a tower so you
don't have to send people out and around, driving around reading
meters every day. So there could be potential cost savings with
that. Trimming a little bit of the fat, if you will, in that area.
Another thing that the utility is looking into is low pressure
wastewater systems. Instead of having lift stations that are
buried way, way under the ground where you -- if you have
maintenance, you've got to dig all the way down and deal with
that, they have -- I guess it's more -- and, again, I'm not an
engineer, so I'm just going to do it in laymen's terms. Pipes are
close to the surface, there's more pumps, it's low pressure, and it's
easier to access and maintain.
So those are a few that might fit in what you're looking at
there for efficiencies and working towards that, and some of
those are already in process, so...
COMMISSIONER HALL: Perfect.
MR. JOHNSON: And with that, if the Board chooses, I can
turn it over to Chris. Thank you.
One second here, Chris. I'll get this up for you.
MR. FABIAN: Wonderful.
Thank you, Commissioners. Thank you, staff, for having
us back. We are very fortunate to be moving into the next phase
of priority-based budgeting, and we will get into some of exactly
what you are looking for for the next step.
My name is Chris Fabian, as a reminder, from Tyler
Technologies. And with me today is Jesse Muniz, who many of
you have had the chance to meet. As a reminder, Jesse was a
former client and then came to work with us full time and leads
implementations across the country.
Let's get into where we are and where we're headed next.
Page 271 of 5415
Page 141
March 4, 2025
Chris, go ahead with the next slide, please. We put
this -- this is a new slide that you have not seen before to help us
explain timeline in terms of where we have been and where we
are headed. And the title of the slide is priority-based budgeting
data, PBB acronym, as the foundation, the key dataset for the
type of changes that we're looking for.
So you see that over on the left-hand side, our very first
effort last year, just one year ago, was to create data that did not
exist before in order to use this data to now advance into where
are we going to find budget savings and new revenue
opportunities.
So last year -- and Jesse will go into this in just a moment as
a recap -- we created that foundational dataset of every program
provided by your departments, the costs of those programs, and
the measurement of the alignment of programs to your strategic
plan results.
You see, as we move towards the middle set of bubbles in
the diagram, if you will, these -- the middle set is what we use
data to produce by way of insights. And at the very top, PBB
data served the county last year and will continue to serve the
county in terms of the basic budget process.
So as you think about how the base budget is evaluated,
where does the current money go, what programs do you fund,
and why do you fund them, that's a base budget question. And
as you think about new proposals that come from departments,
whether they're additions to their budget or new revenues or
efficiencies, you now have, by way of that first budget process
transformation, a lens with which to see how any spending
request relates to your priorities or does not, and that's the basic
budget process.
Page 272 of 5415
Page 142
March 4, 2025
As you move down, resource optimization was our very first
set of insights, and that came with the ROI report last year. So
what was that all about? That was the first cut to say, all right,
now that we see every program that you're providing, let us
provide options to say, given this program, are there ways to
generate new revenue to fund the program, or are there ways to
reduce expenses?
With every program evaluated against priorities, an
opportunity that everyone has all the time, is really important, is
not to do the program. And you have -- we have the data now to
be able to address that type of question. But the first set of
insights was a list of options to say, anticipating that you may
wish to continue this program, here are different ways that other
local governments have funded it before, and that's really critical.
Commissioner McDaniel, as you discussed cost recovery
and revenue, which has been a subject of some of the initial
insights, it is important to think through. If we do bring in new
alternative revenue to fund a program, whether that's grants or
fees, you're exactly right that that is a new source of revenue.
Perhaps -- all revenue ultimately comes from some source of a
fee payer or a taxpayer, but what it allows you to do is reduce the
subsidized element of the program, the backfill, if you will, and
give you the option to either reallocate it towards something else
you want to fund or refund it back to taxpayers.
So those are -- that is the -- that's the point of a new revenue
that's interesting to be able to take into consideration. If I bring
in new alternative revenue sources and I don't have to use
General Fund or ad valorem subsidization, you now free up those
resources to either fund something else that you couldn't fund
before or provide it back to the taxpayers overall, and that's
Page 273 of 5415
Page 143
March 4, 2025
a -- that's a really handy option to have.
And furthermore, as far as expense reduction, efficiencies,
partnerships, many of which -- not all the insights have been
revenue based. There are a number of efficiencies, but there's
more to come. Staff has taken the most actionable insights to
move forward with, but it's not -- it's not exhausted. So
there -- that effort will continue on.
So 2024 was the kickoff, 2025 now we move into action and
execution, and that will continue on. I have another section of
the presentation specifically on those insights for probably years
to come and will continue to be refreshed.
One thing you're building is a culture of resourcefulness
where you're always looking for new ways to consider how
you're funding these programs and how to be optimized by way
of your resources.
Okay. Let's move to that third bubble down. Program
efficiency is the task at hand this year, and I hope that this is
directly on the mark with what you're hoping to get into. But
this will be a new set of insights.
So the first set of insights were understanding from that PBB
blueprint, how to fund something differently or how to look at the
revenue model, the funding model itself. This year we'll be
tackling all programs with process efficiency. What are the key
business processes that go into delivering services? How can we
come to understand how these processes work and where we
have insights for process streamlining, new technology
utilization, the kind of approaches that can help make a program
more efficient.
So there will be a new set of insights specific to efficiencies
this year. And just like last year, you'll get your first report of
Page 274 of 5415
Page 144
March 4, 2025
program efficiencies, consider them, move to those that are most
actionable and begin to take action on those just like you have
taken action on the first set of resource optimization insights this
go-round.
Finally, last but not least, while resource optimization and
program efficiency are two key areas to take a crack at finding
ways to use the resources you have more efficiently, we need to
move to effectiveness and impact. And the very last step which
we're proposing to consider, perhaps a pilot department as late
as -- later this year. And moving into 2026, we'll be looking at
program impact insights.
So shifting the focus from how do we run the program as
streamlined as possible to how do we deliver impact to the
maximum degree by way of KPIs. And this, hopefully, is a
better depiction, this slide, of the multiple layers or the different
sets of insights which are recommendations to question what we
do, why we do it, can we run it more efficiently, and ultimately,
can we run it more effectively, and that's an impact question.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner Hall.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Great. I mean, I said it last
year, and I'm going to say it again: "I'm beginning to see the
method to the madness."
Can you just give us an example, a real-life example of a
key performance indicator for efficiencies.
MR. FABIAN: For efficiencies.
COMMISSIONER HALL: KPI.
MR. FABIAN: I will be getting into that in just a few
slides for building inspections.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Okay.
MR. FABIAN: You got it.
Page 275 of 5415
Page 145
March 4, 2025
So we're going to take this step by step. Jesse's going to
cover the PBB data foundation, then I'm going to move into the
resource optimization insights, the program efficiency insights
for this year, Jesse will bring us home with program impact, and
then we'll show this slide again to see if we're getting clear. All
right.
MR. MUNIZ: Commissioners, again, thank you for having
me here today. I'm excited to have been a part of this project.
It's been fun to work with the staff and, as I mentioned -- as I
wanted mention to the Board here is, you know, Collier County
has done some amazing work with building the PBB data, right?
And from its foundation, it's building that data, an additional data
layer set that you didn't have before.
And so staff's been very engaging, they're asking a lot of
good questions, and building that dataset to allow us to get to the
point that we're getting here today.
So I'm going to go through really quick just some
foundational data development of how we got here.
Chris, next slide.
As Chris has kind of mentioned, you know, priority-based
budgeting is what we call transformative because it's clearly
revealing what we do, what it costs, and then why we do it, right?
And so up there you see some of the accomplishments I feel
like we should point out over the last year is translating that
general ledger data into more program focused. I think one of
the biggest challenges and one of the biggest barriers that
organizations face when they're doing this project is having that
open mind about looking at their budget from a program lens,
right? Everyone's so used to seeing budgets at a line-item level,
everyone's so used to seeing budgets at a fund
Page 276 of 5415
Page 146
March 4, 2025
department/division, tax source level, and so to take a step back
and actually identify the program and services you identify and
put those in a report that says, "Here's what we do, and here's
why we do it." And the staff here has been amazing in
developing that data, and that's a huge Step 1 to get going.
Again, as we mentioned, each program was evaluated, and it
was based on the alignment with your strategic priorities ensuring
there's transparency about how those resources are directly
supporting your goals, and then by also adding the element of
program revenues, we've created some greater clarity around true
cost recovery, right?
And so a lot of the cost recovery opportunities that we see
throughout this presentation is by identifying those program
remedies from the beginning, where can we have some additional
where possible.
And it's -- basically what we did to get to the data that we
have today, we went through these stages. So we developed a
comprehensive list of all the programs, which last year we
developed almost 500 programs, and the staff is already looking
at this year and have added a few more throughout the process.
And so again, this sounds very engaging in getting this done.
We mapped those costs from the line-item Level 2
programs. Again, we mapped the revenue as well, a strategic
alignment.
And then that last one there is something that is very
important is the program attributes, right? So not only did we
look at the programs and align them with the priorities, we also
looked at the why, right? So why are we providing these
services? Why are we providing these programs? And that's a
huge key data point to identify, because at that -- with those data
Page 277 of 5415
Page 147
March 4, 2025
points, you can now determine what service levels do you need to
have in order to run your government officially?
You talk about running a lean government, a big
government at a smaller price, that's where we start to get those
data points is where -- when we look at the data points of the
why, why we're doing it, is it mandated, is the demand
increasing, or is it decreasing, is it something that we're the only
ones that can do, when you evaluate against these basic points,
now you can start looking for, quote-unquote, the fat of
government and where you can kind of pull back on service
levels. So that's where we're going to be aiming towards is those
key data points are going to help us get there.
Next slide.
And, yeah, I'll turn it over to Chris to kind of talk about the
ROI report in general.
MR. FABIAN: So Insight Set 1, the ROI report and
resource optimization.
Go ahead, next slide.
So this is what Chris has talked about. This is what you're
most familiar with, the ROI report, so we're re-remembering what
this one was all about. But the first set of insights allowed you
to evaluate or scrutinize how all of your resources are going
towards the programs that you fund and asking the question:
Can we provide this program differently than how we're
providing it today in order to reduce subsidization? Whether
that's through new alternative revenue, program efficiencies,
partnerships, and some of the examples that Chris pointed to
today.
If you remember, that very first report had upwards
85 million to over 100 million across all departments that were
Page 278 of 5415
Page 148
March 4, 2025
evaluated. And again, scrutinizing all the possible strategies,
and we need that. We need all of the options on the table
besides reducing services. That's one option. But other options
are efficiency, partnership, service-level tradeoffs, new revenue,
fees and charges, grant funding. Those are the alternative
options to resource or fund a current program overall.
Next slide, Chris. And you can advance through the
animations, but it's the reminder visually of the report, the
summary of the insights, the first look at some of the insights in
action, and ultimately -- one more, Chris -- the types of specific
insight-by-insight reports that we really love to see staff taking
on. It gets back to that accountability of each and every insight
that we're looking at. What's the timeline? Are we actually
able to move forward with each of these?
So, again, just as a reminder, a comprehensive look at all of
the programs backed by case study examples of how other
organizations have been able to do this before and, as Chris
mentioned, the immediate progress on approximately 37 million
with others in the hopper is really critical.
And here's the last point on the current program insights that
you have. You will have months and years to come of
continuing to scrutinize these program insights to look for cost
efficiencies and alternative revenue approaches to fund your
programs. So that's the insights that you know, all about
resource optimization.
Next slide.
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: One quick one.
MR. FABIAN: This year we move -- oh, sorry.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Hang on just a second.
Question, Commissioner McDaniel?
Page 279 of 5415
Page 149
March 4, 2025
COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Before we go there -- and
that moves into a discussion that we had the other day with
regard to the merit pay and Trinity's joke about the 10 percent. I
made a joke a while back in a private session that we could work
for free just on a percentage of what we save our taxpayers as
opposed to the salaries that we, in fact, get, and moving towards
that merit pay program will incentivize our staff to be looking at
these things.
I'm already seeing a cultural shift transpiring right in the
recent past. So having -- having that merit pay plan of some
form or format -- it certainly can't be 10 percent. But it can be
something to incentivize our staff, because I think Chris Hall -- or
Commissioner Hall said it quite some time ago, the folks that are
on the ground doing the job all day every day are the best people
to be able to come and tell us where our inefficiencies, in fact,
are, and they should be compensated for that when, in fact, they
identify those things.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: All right.
MR. FABIAN: Okay. Next slide.
This year is when we move into program efficiencies. So
think about it this way, last year we took your priority-based
budgeting data, all your programs, and we studied different
business models, different funding models, and we came up with
recommendations and options. This year it's a different analysis.
Same programs, but now we're looking at efficiencies.
We're looking at business processes. We're looking at ways to
streamline the same programs that you're providing, so it's
entirely focused on service delivery, the types of programs that
you provide, and efficiency insights. Those will be the types of
recommendations that come back to the organization.
Page 280 of 5415
Page 150
March 4, 2025
Just like last year, to the greatest extent possible, we will
cross-reference any efficiency recommendation that we have with
other organizations, because benchmarking and case studies are
really important to build faith that this can be done, that another
organization has taken a different approach, and that there are
innovations out there.
Chris, next slide, please.
Okay. So, Commissioner Hall, back to some -- an example.
So let's take an example like building inspections. You have
building inspections. It's one of your current programs which
entails -- well, I should say, first and foremost, here's the -- here's
the good news. Here's how we use priority-based budgeting
data. We have identified this program 366 days ago, over one
year ago. I didn't know if you did building permits or
inspections or what went into it. Now we can see across the
organization the multiple inspections that actually take place
here, among which are building inspections and plan review.
So current-state assessment is understanding do you offer
this service? What is the service? What's the program
description? Is it mandated? What's the regulatory requirement
for providing it? Does it pay for itself? Did it partially pay for
itself? So we built that PBB data so we have the current state
assessment.
What we'll move into this year are items like you see, a
process flow. What's -- how does business get done? What are
the key business processes that take place to go from initial plan
review and applying for a permit or an inspection to all the steps
that take place in the middle to ultimate permit issued? What's
the timing? What are other metrics to measure?
Chris, next slide, please.
Page 281 of 5415
Page 151
March 4, 2025
So as we go through building inspection, an example of key
areas to begin to analyze program efficiencies include process
simplification. So what are the steps that take place? Are these
the normal steps that other organizations go through to issue a
permit? Is there anything out of the norm that we see that's
taking place in Collier County compared to other organizations?
And is this for a good reason, or is there an opportunity to
consider a streamlined approach?
We'll move into technology utilization. Chris, in one of the
insights, already identified meter reading as a great example of
this where technology is added to change -- successfully deliver a
key step in a business process but to do it more efficiently with
the use of technology, which has a one-time cost and perhaps
ongoing maintenance costs allowing you to free up human
resources and time and reallocate or save the money in a business
process. And that's really key to think through, because even for
all of these efficiency recommendations, you will find there will
be personnel savings, and there will be non-personnel savings to
consider overall.
And the same option will be before you, what do you do
with those savings? Do we free up and reallocate to fund
something else, or do you free up in order to refund? And that's
the point of a program efficiency.
We'll look at cross-departmental collaborations. So one of
the really powerful use cases for your priority-based budgeting
data is to look at how many different departments are involved in
delivering any given program or service or involved in a process.
So we've seen tremendous examples already of centralization and
streamlining within the organization.
So again, Commissioner McDaniel, back to your culture
Page 282 of 5415
Page 152
March 4, 2025
that's taking -- that already is moving in this direction. We'll
double down on cross-departmental collaboration and continue to
work in lockstep with staff to look for ways that we can look for
streamlining across departments.
And ultimately, customer interaction point, where does that
come into play? Because that sets us up for the performance
component that Jesse will get into.
Last but not least, Chris, last slide here on efficiency for the
programs that we analyze from the efficiency lens, whether we're
looking at streamlining recommendations, automation, staffing,
funding model. Change in policy might be one. We may very
well find out that part of the reason you provide a program that
you provide is because you require it of yourselves. It's your
own policies. It's your own ordinances. And that will be a
question back to the organization is to take a look at ways that
you can free up your own requirements upon yourself as opposed
to a state mandate or a federal requirement or best practice.
So hopefully this is helpful to understand, by way of an
example, of one program, the type of program efficiency
evaluation that we'll go through and, ultimately, the type of
recommendations that we will be able to get into.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Commissioner Hall.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Thank you, Chairman.
So in this example, you know, I can understand -- so we're
going to go to $130 per inspection as an increase in revenue for
what we do as a service. Is there anything that's going to take
into consideration -- let me back up. So that's -- that could be a
KPI; that could be a key performance indicator that gives you
immediate -- you know, immediate feedback to what's going on.
But at the same time, is there anything that's going to be
Page 283 of 5415
Page 153
March 4, 2025
implemented with the data or with the streamlining or with the
efficiencies that says, "Hey, at this point we're counterproductive.
Yes, we're -- we're having more inspections, but are we doing it
on purpose to raise money, or are we aggravating the industry,"
or are we -- or can we just say, you know, in one inspection, you
know, give us your feedback or give us your solve online or, you
know, a picture or -- I'm just bringing up, if there's -- I don't want
to create something and know it's going on but not have it in the
best interest of the people that we serve.
MR. FABIAN: I think it's ultimately a great question. So
first and foremost, I can say we'll have the data before us to be
able to ask that type of question. And with benchmarking and
other community examples, we can at least put that data into
context to arrive at the hypothesis: Is this appropriate, the fees
that we're charging for a permit in order to deliver it with a
certain turnaround time? Looking for -- we have customer
service enhancements. Interviewing of stakeholders will be a
key component as well to look for.
COMMISSIONER HALL: Okay.
MR. FABIAN: Can we get the rest of the story?
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: All right. Thank you. Is
there anything else?
MR. FABIAN: We do.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Yes.
MR. FABIAN: Okay. So that's this year. And now think
about the insights that Chris just went through, Chris Johnson.
Last year you got the ROI report and the resource optimization,
different funding model insights, and this year you see a report on
first progress and tremendous progress, and it's ongoing.
So picture a parallel path now where we'll have efficiency
Page 284 of 5415
Page 154
March 4, 2025
insights for each program. Coming to you later this year, same
vetting process will take place. And by this time next year, you
start to look for progress on those efficiency insights before you.
And last but not least, so at that point you've said, "All right,
we know the programs we offer. We know how much they cost.
We know why we provide them. We can question whether we
should be in this business or not. We can question what's the
appropriate funding model. We can question efficiency," and
with those questions answered -- this is why we do it in the order
that we do -- the last question -- not the last, but among the last
questions to answer is, how can we increase effectiveness or
impact?
And I'll turn it over to Jesse. Next slide, please.
MR. MUNIZ: I think the key here on this slide -- and I
won't read it word for word, but I think the key here is that now
that we have that program inventory, now that we have all the
data that we've developed, it's about just continuous
improvement. It's about constantly evaluate the data, constantly
reviewing the programs that we offer, and just finding ways to
ensure that we're accountable for all the dollars that we're
investing, right?
I think the key theme here is value. You know, what we're
looking for is, you know, being able to provide more results with
the same money, you know, being able to provide less [sic]
results for less money, et cetera, right?
And so we're looking for value in this whole exercise. And
by having this data, by having what we've built now, that's where
we can start to find those efficiencies and those value
propositions.
And so I think what we're -- what I want to say is over the
Page 285 of 5415
Page 155
March 4, 2025
last year, this -- Collier County has kind of jumped ahead. We
usually have this process in Years 3 or 4 when we're working
with organizations and we get to this stuff, but you guys were
already, after Year 1, in this process of looking for these types of
efficiencies and optimizations.
And so it's a credit to what you're doing as a staff and
changes of culture that you're here at this point.
And so although I know it sounds like, you know, things
aren't moving as quickly as -- maybe as you want, I think you
are -- you are way ahead than most organizations that we work
with at this level.
And so I commend you all for being that, and that all is
because -- based on leadership. That's all based on the direction
that you want to go and having a staff that is really willing to step
in and to do that.
So, again, you guys are doing an excellent job, and it's been
fun to work with you on this project, and really looking forward
to seeing what those efficiency gains that we can get over the
next year and going forward.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: Mr. Johnson, what's our next
steps here? No one's lit up for questions at this point. So what's
next?
MR. JOHNSON: This is the end of our presentation today.
So as far as --
COMMISSIONER HALL: Aren't you glad?
MR. JOHNSON: I'm having a great time.
As far as the budget process goes, next board meeting, on
the 11th, we'll revisit policy for adoption. From there, staff will
begin the process of putting the budget together.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: I think I'd like to spend a half
Page 286 of 5415
Page 156
March 4, 2025
hour or so after this meeting with Jesse just to go over a few
things.
MR. JOHNSON: If I can get him for 20 minutes after that,
that would be good, too, you know.
COMMISSIONER KOWAL: Uber standing by or --
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: No one's lit up. We have no
speakers online, I assume.
MR. MILLER: No.
CHAIRMAN SAUNDERS: If there's nothing else, then
we're going to go ahead and adjourn. If that's the will of the
Board, we are adjourned.
*******
Page 287 of 5415
Page 157
March 4, 2025
There being no further business for the good of the County, the
meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 2:19 p.m.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX
OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF
SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL
___________________________________
BURT SAUNDERS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST
CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK
______________________________
These minutes approved by the Board on ____________, as
presented ______________ or as corrected _____________.
TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF FORT MYERS
COURT REPORTING BY TERRI L. LEWIS, REGISTERED
PROFESSIONAL COURT REPORTER, FPR-C, AND
NOTARY PUBLIC.
Page 288 of 5415