Loading...
BCC Minutes 01/28/2025 RJanuary 28, 2025 Page 1 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Naples, Florida, January 28, 2025 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Board of County Commissioners, in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following Board members present: Chairman: Dan Kowal Chris Hall Rick LoCastro William L. McDaniel, Jr. Burt L. Saunders (Absent) ALSO PRESENT: Amy Patterson, County Manager Ed Finn, Deputy County Manager Jeffrey A. Klatzkow, County Attorney Crystal K. Kinzel, Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller Troy Miller, Communications & Customer Relations January 28, 2025 Page 2 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Community Redevelopment Agency Board (CRAB) Airport Authority AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 January 28, 2025 9:00 AM Commissioner Burt Saunders, District 3; – Chair (Absent) Commissioner Dan Kowal, District 4; – Vice Chair Commissioner Rick LoCastro, District 1 Commissioner Chris Hall, District 2; Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr., District 5 NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. ALL REGISTERED SPEAKERS WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE MINUTES UNLESS THE TIME IS ADJUSTED BY THE CHAIR. ADDITIONAL MINUTES MAY BE CEDED TO AN IN-PERSON SPEAKER BY OTHER REGISTERED SPEAKERS WHO MUST BE PRESENT AT THE TIME THE SPEAKER IS HEARD. NO PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL BE HEARD FOR PROCLAMATIONS, PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC PETITIONS. SPEAKERS ON PRESENTATIONS ARE LIMITED TO 10 MINUTES, UNLESS EXTENDED BY THE CHAIR. ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON A CONSENT ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO THE BOARD’S APPROVAL OF THE DAY’S CONSENT AGENDA, WHICH IS January 28, 2025 Page 3 HEARD AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MEETING FOLLOWING THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. ANYONE WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON PUBLIC PETITION MUST SUBMIT THE REQUEST IN WRITING TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING. THE REQUEST SHALL PROVIDE DETAILED INFORMATION AS TO THE NATURE OF THE PETITION. THE PUBLIC PETITION MAY NOT INVOLVE A MATTER ON A FUTURE BOARD AGENDA AND MUST CONCERN A MATTER IN WHICH THE BOARD CAN TAKE ACTION. PUBLIC PETITIONS ARE LIMITED TO A SINGLE PRESENTER, WITH A MAXIMUM TIME OF TEN MINUTES, UNLESS EXTENDED BY THE CHAIR. SHOULD THE PETITION BE GRANTED, THE ITEM WILL BE PLACED ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON GENERAL TOPICS NOT ON THIS AGENDA OR A FUTURE AGENDA MUST REGISTER TO SPEAK PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC COMMENT PORTION OF THE AGENDA BEING CALLED BY THE CHAIR. SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES, AND NO ADDITIONAL MINUTES MAY BE CEDED TO THE SPEAKER. AT THE CHAIR’S DISCRETION, THE NUMBER OF PUBLIC SPEAKERS MAY BE LIMITED TO 5 FOR THAT MEETING. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003-53 AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY FACILITIES January 28, 2025 Page 4 MANAGEMENT DIVISION LOCATED AT 3335 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, SUITE 1, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380. LUNCH RECESS SCHEDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M. 1. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. Invocation by Pastor David Wildman - Grow Church Estates, the Pledge of Allegiance by Marina Berkovich, Jewish Historical Society of SWFL. 2. AGENDA AND MINUTES A. Approval of today's Regular, Consent, and Summary agenda as amended (ex-parte disclosure provided by Commission members for Consent agenda.) 3. AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS A. Employee 1) 20 Year Attendees a. Angel Tarpley- Building Plan Review & Inspection 2) 25 Year Attendees a. David Engelhart- Building Plan Review & Inspection b. Alfredo Arcia- Parks & Recreation 3) 30 Year Attendees 4) 35 Year Attendees B. Advisory Board Members C. Retirees D. Employee of the Month January 28, 2025 Page 5 4. PROCLAMATIONS 5. PRESENTATIONS 6. PUBLIC PETITIONS 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS - On general topics not on the current or future agenda. 8. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. This item has been continued from the December 10, 2024, BCC Meeting. This item requires that ex-parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve a Resolution designating Plot N of the Rosemary Cemetery as historically significant, pursuant to the historic/archaeological preservation regulations as provided in Section 2.03.07.E of the Collier County Land Development Code. The subject property, approximately .02± acres, is located in the southwest corner of Pine Ridge Road and Goodlette Frank Road, in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, PL20240009511 (This Item is a companion to Item #9B) B. This item has been continued from the December 10, 2024, BCC Meeting. This item requires that ex-parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve a Resolution designating Plot W of the Rosemary Cemetery as historically significant, pursuant to the historic/archaeological preservation regulations as provided in Section 2.03.07.E of the Collier County Land Development Code. The subject property, approximately .04± acres, is located south of Pine Ridge Road, approximately 592 feet east of US 41, in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, PL20240009512. (This Item is a companion to Item #9A) C. This item has been continued from the December 10, 2024, BCC Meeting. Recommendation to review and approve the 2024 combined Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities and Schedule of Capital Improvements as provided for in Section 6.02.02 of the Collier January 28, 2025 Page 6 County Land Development Code and Section 163.3177(3)(b), Florida Statutes and adopt a Resolution that updates the 5-Year Capital Improvement Schedule. (PL20240010770) 10. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 11. COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT A. Recommendation to approve and accept Quit Claim Deeds for two outlying parcels of land which were originally part of Rosemary Cemetery, located south of Pine Ridge Road between US 41 and Goodlette-Frank Road, at a cost not to exceed $62.50 for recording of the Deeds. (This Item is a companion to Items #9A & #9B; continued from the December 10, 2024, BCC Meeting) 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 13. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 14. AIRPORT AUTHORITY AND/OR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 15. STAFF AND COMMISSION GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS A. Public Comments on General Topics Not on the Current or Future Agenda by Individuals Not Already Heard During Previous Public Comments in this Meeting B. Staff Project Updates C. Staff and Commission General Communications Added (Per Agenda Change Sheet) 1) Juvenile Justice Circuit 20 Advisory Board County Representative – Commissioner or their designee (Commissioner LoCastro’ s Request) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 16. CONSENT AGENDA - All matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken by one motion without separate discussion of January 28, 2025 Page 7 each item. If discussion is desired by a member of the Board, that item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Approved and/or Adopted w/changes – 4/0 (Commissioner Saunders absent) A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 1) Recommendation to approve final acceptance of the potable water and sewer utility facilities and accept the conveyance of the potable water and sewer utility facilities and appurtenant utility easement for Caymas Phase One – Phase 1E & 1F, PL20240006738. 2) Recommendation to approve final acceptance of the potable water utility facilities for NCH Business Center Sterile Processing Department, PL20240012598. 3) Recommendation to approve a Resolution for final acceptance of the private roadway and drainage improvements and acceptance of the plat dedications for the final plat of Greyhawk at Golf Club of the Everglades Phase 3, Application Number PL20180001192, and authorize the release of the maintenance security in the amount of $119,996.59. 4) Recommendation to approve a Resolution for final acceptance of the private roadway and drainage improvements and acceptance of the plat dedications for the final plat of Isles of Collier Preserve Phase 14, Application Number PL20190002012, and authorize the release of the maintenance security in the amount of $739,407.70. 5) Recommendation to authorize the Clerk of Courts to release a Performance Bond in the amount of $10,520, which was posted as a development guarantee for an Early Work Authorization (EWA) for work associated with Prima Auto Condos, PL20240009535. 6) This item requires that Commission members provide ex-parte disclosure. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the plat of Santa Barbara Place Villas, approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement, and approval of the performance security in the amount of $995,967.50. January 28, 2025 Page 8 (Application Number PL20240002384) 7) Recommendation for the Board of County Commissioners to review and approve the proposed Temporary Use (Special Event) Permit for the Country Jam Concert proposed for the Paradise Coast Sports Complex on March 1, 2025, located at 3865 City Gate Blvd S., Naples, FL 34117, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. 8) Recommendation to approve ArborX Inc., as a qualified applicant to the Collier County Basic Industry Growth Promotion Incentive Program and authorize the Chairman to execute the attached agreement for Project “CARBO” and approve all necessary Budget Amendments. 9) Recommendation to approve a Special Event Permit and the road closures that are necessary for the Annual Everglades Seafood Festival to be held February 5 – 10, 2024, in Everglades City, in order to fulfill Collier County’s special event permit requirements for road closures. B. TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 1) Recommendation to approve an Agreement for the purchase of a drainage easement (Parcel 148DE) required for the West Goodlette- Frank Road Area Stormwater Improvement Project Phase 2 (Project No. 60142). Estimated Fiscal Impact: $46,328. 2) Recommendation to approve an Agreement for the purchase of right of way (Parcel 1364FEE) required for the Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext. – Phase 2 Project (Project No. 60249). Estimated Fiscal Impact: $82,483. Continued to the February 11, 2025, BCC Meeting (Per Agenda Change Sheet) 3) Recommendation to approve and execute a Purchase and Sales Agreement with Joseph D. Stewart, P.A. for the purchase of unit 105, which is the last remaining available unit to purchase out of 18 condominium office units within the Court Plaza III building situated on 1.17 improved acres on Airport Road South, adjacent to the Government Center, for the Community & Human Services Division. (This Item is a companion to Item #16B4) January 28, 2025 Page 9 Continued to the February 11, 2025, BCC Meeting (Per Agenda Change Sheet) 4) Recommendation to approve and execute a Purchase and Sales Agreement and Addendum with Bigi & Bigi, LLC, the purchase of 14 out of 18 condominium office units within the Court Plaza III building situated on 1.17 improved acres on Airport Road South, adjacent to the Government Center, for the Community & Human Services Division, and authorize any associated Budget Amendments. (This Item is a companion to Item #16B3) 5) Recommendation to award a Work/Purchase Order for a Request for Quotation (“RFQ”) for the 17th Street SW at Keane Avenue Stormwater Improvement project under Agreement No. 20-7800, “Underground Contractor Services,” to Mitchell & Stark Construction, Co, Inc., in the total amount of $824,068.44, which includes a base bid amount of $749,153.13 and an Owner’s Allowance of $74,915.31, approve the necessary Budget Amendment, and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Work/Purchase Order. (Project Number 50238) 6) Recommendation to approve the Resolution authorizing the Chairman to execute Section 5311 Public Transit Grant Agreement (FPN 410120-1-84-43) with the Florida Department of Transportation to accept Federal Transit Administration grant funding in the total amount of $1,568,510 to provide transit service to the rural area of Collier County, and to authorize the necessary Budget Amendments. (CAT Grant Fund 4031) 7) Recommendation to accept a donation of sand from Stewart Materials received by Collier County in advance of Hurricane Helene and Milton's landfalls in the amount of $25,968. 8) Recommendation to approve a Resolution and District Office Lease Amendment with Congressman Mario Diaz-Balart for additional County-owned office space. 9) Recommendation to award a Work/Purchase Order for a Request for Quotation (“RFQ”) for the 23rd Street SW at Keane Avenue Stormwater Improvement project under Agreement No. 20-7800, "Underground Contractor Services," to Mitchell & Stark Construction, January 28, 2025 Page 10 Co., Inc., in the total amount of $879,811.90, which includes a base bid amount of $799.829.00 and an Owner’s Allowance of $79,982.90, approve the necessary Budget Amendment, and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Purchase Order. (Project Number 50238) 10) Recommendation to approve a work order with Humiston & Moore Engineers to provide professional support services for the application of a modification to USACE Permit No. AJ-2004-07621(IP-MJD) to allow dredged sand to be placed on Delnor-Wiggins State Park beach, under the current library services contract #18-7432-CZ for time and material estimated at $21,245; authorize the Chairman to execute the work order; and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. 11) Recommendation to award Invitation to Bid (“ITB”) No. 24-8325, “Concrete: Sidewalks, Curbs & Gutters, and Related Items,” to Pavement Maintenance, LLC (Primary), National Traffic Solution, Inc. (Secondary), and Coastal Concrete Products, LLC, d/b/a Coastal Site Development (Tertiary), and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Agreements. 12) Recommendation to award Invitation to Bid (“ITB”) No. 24-8290 “Irrigation Pump Station Maintenance, Repairs, and Services” to Agricultural Services International, LLC, and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement. C. PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners, as ex- officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District (CCWSD), award Invitation to Bid (“ITB”) #24-8228, “Crane Rental Services,” to Maxim Crane Works, L.P., and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Agreement. D. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT 1) Recommendation to award Invitation to Bid (“ITB”) No. 24-8294, “Senior Meal Program,” to G.A. Food Services of Pinellas County, LLC, and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Agreement. January 28, 2025 Page 11 2) Recommendation to approve technical revisions and clarifying language to the Collier County State Housing Initiatives Partnership Local Housing Assistance Plan for Fiscal Years 2022-2023, 2023- 2024, and 2024-2025 Disaster Assistance and Rental Development strategies; and a SHIP FY 2021/2022 expenditure extension to June 30, 2025. (SHIP Grant Fund 1053) 3) Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign a State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Collier County and MHP FL VII, LLLP to further affordable housing initiatives through a $1,246,600.80 impact fee loan for new construction of rental housing units at the Ekos Cadenza development and authorize the County Manager or designee to execute any and all SHIP-related subordination agreements for this property in accordance with the MOU. (SHIP Grant Fund 1053) E. CORPORATE BUSINESS OPERATIONS 1) Recommendation to approve a Third Amendment to Agreement No. 15-6474R, “Medical Director for Collier County and Employment Physicals and Drug Testing,” with Advance Medical of Naples, LLC. 2) Recommendation to approve the administrative report prepared by the Procurement Services Division for various County Divisions’ after- the-fact purchases requiring Board approval in accordance with Procurement Ordinance 2017-08, as amended, and the Procurement Manual, in the amount of $49,613.51. 3) Recommendation to approve the administrative report prepared by the Procurement Services Division for various County Divisions’ after- the-fact purchases requiring Board approval in accordance with Procurement Ordinance 2017-08, as amended, and the Procurement Manual, in the amount of $18,129.87. 4) Recommendation to ratify Property, Casualty, Workers’ Compensation and Subrogation claim files settled and/or closed by the Risk Management Division Director pursuant to Resolution No. 04-15 for the first quarter of FY 25. January 28, 2025 Page 12 5) Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Third Extension and Amendment to the Service-Learning Agreement between the Florida Gulf Coast University Board of Trustees and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners through January 24, 2029. 6) Recommendation to approve an Assumption Agreement assigning all rights, duties, benefits, and obligations to Integrity Environmental Solutions, LLC, concerning Agreement No. 18-7432-SW, “Professional Services Library Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Engineering Category.” 7) Recommendation to approve modifications to the 2025 Fiscal Year Pay & Classification Plan which consists of two new classifications, two reclassifications, and removal of one obsolete classification from October 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. F. COUNTY MANAGER OPERATIONS 1) Recommendation to approve the expenditure of up to $10,000 of Tourism Development Tax (TDT) Promotion funds to support the upcoming March 2025 Trilogy Lacrosse event and make a finding that these expenditures promote tourism. 2) Recommendation to approve the use of the Paradise Coast Sports Complex for the purpose of a civilian landing site by the United States Armed Forces for a lacrosse game and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Hold Harmless agreement. 3) Recommendation to renew the annual Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (COPCN) for Just Like Family Concierge Medical Transport Services, d/b/a Brewster Ambulance Service, to provide Class 2 Advanced Life Support (ALS) inter-facility transport ambulance service for a period of one year. 4) Recommendation to adopt a Resolution approving amendments (appropriating grants, donations, contributions or insurance proceeds) to the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Adopted Budget. (The Budget Amendments in the attached Resolution have been reviewed and January 28, 2025 Page 13 approved by the Board of County Commissioners via separate Executive Summaries.) 5) Recommendation to award Invitation to Bid (“ITB”) No. 24-8314, construction of the Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park Phase 2A Signalized Intersection on Oil Well Road at Big Corkscrew Drive, to Quality Enterprises USA, Inc., in the amount of $2,442,394.00, approve a $200,000.00 Owner’s Allowance, and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Agreement. (Project No. 80039) Continued to a Future BCC Meeting (Per Agenda Change Sheet) 6) Recommendation to approve Change Order No. 1, adding 180 days to the project time under Agreement No. 22-7951 with Chris -Tel Company of Southwest Florida, Inc., d/b/a Chris-Tel Construction, to support the remaining pre-construction services for the Courthouse Multi-Project Execution contract and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Change Order. (Project No. 50235) 7) Recommendation to ratify administratively approved Change Order No. 6, adding $98,582.08 to the contract amount under Agreement No. 22-7960 with Waypoint Contracting, Inc., for the Collier County Emergency Service Center East Bay Enclosure, and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Change Order. (Project No. 50390) G. AIRPORT AUTHORITY 1) Recommendation to ratify administratively approved Change Order No. 2, adding four days to the contract time and use $12,626.46 from the Owner's Allowance for Work Directive #2 under Agreement No. 23-8120 (Purchase Order 4500229417) with DEC Contracting Group, Inc., for the “Bulk Aircraft Hangar at Marco Island Executive Airport,” and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Change Order. (Project No. 33822) H. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS I. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE J. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS January 28, 2025 Page 14 1) To record in the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners, the check number (or other payment method), amount, payee, and purpose for which the referenced disbursements in the amount of $48,183,993.95 were drawn for the periods between January 2, 2025, and January 15, 2025, pursuant to Florida Statute 136.06. 2) Request that the Board approve and determine valid public purpose for invoices payable and purchasing card transactions as of January 22, 2025. K. COUNTY ATTORNEY 1) Recommendation to authorize the County Attorney to make a settlement offer of $15,000, as a nuisance threshold for litigation strategy purposes, in the matter styled Terri Hohmann Dakan et al. v. Collier County Board of County Commissioners, Case No. 23-CA- 2715, pending in the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida. 2) Recommendation to approve an insurance settlement whereby the County will receive $9,157.44 to settle and release the County’s claim against Evangelina Sierra Havran for costs incurred to replace a damaged light pole, and to authorize the County Manager or designee to execute the release. 3) Recommendation to reappoint two members to the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee. 4) Recommendation to approve an Amendment to a mediated Partial Settlement Agreement with Quality Enterprises USA, Inc., concerning Design-Build Agreement No. 20-7708, pertaining to the construction of the Veteran’s Memorial Boulevard Extension Phase I project, and to authorize the Chairman to sign the attached amended Partial Settlement Agreement. L. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 17. SUMMARY AGENDA - This section is for advertised public hearings and must meet the following criteria: 1) A recommendation for approval from staff; 2) Unanimous recommendation for approval by the Collier County January 28, 2025 Page 15 Planning Commission or other authorizing agencies of all members present and voting; 3) No written or oral objections to the item received by staff, the Collier County Planning Commission, other authorizing agencies or the Board, prior to the commencement of the BCC meeting on which the items are scheduled to be heard; and 4) No individuals are registered to speak in opposition to the item. For those items which are quasi-judicial in nature, all participants must be sworn in. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Adopted – 4/0 (Commissioner Saunders absent) A. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending the Collier County Growth Management Plan to create the Tamiami Trail Greenway Road Mixed Use Subdistrict, to allow construction of 300 multi-family rental units with affordable housing and up to 64,000 square feet of gross floor area of Commercial Intermediate, C-3 Zoning District Uses, and furthermore directing transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Commerce. The subject property is located north of Tamiami Trail East, approximately 441 feet west of intersection of Tamiami Trail East and Greenway Road, in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 24.41± acres. PL20230008643-(GMPA) (This Item is a companion to Item #17B) B. Recommendation to approve an ordinance rezoning property from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District partly with an Airport Zoning Overlay to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District partly with an Airport Zoning Overlay for a project to be known as Tamiami Trail Greenway Road MPUD to allow development of up to 300 multi-family rental units with affordable housing, and up to 64,000 square feet of gross floor area of commercial intermediate (C-3) zoning district uses on property located north of Tamiami Trail East, approximately 441 feet west of intersection of Tamiami Trail East and Greenway Road, in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East; consisting of 24.41± acres. (This Item is a companion to Item #17A) C. Recommendation to adopt a Resolution approving amendments (appropriating carry forward, transfers and supplemental revenue) to the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Adopted Budget. (The budget amendments in the attached Resolution have been reviewed and approved by the Board of County Commissioners via separate Executive Summaries.) January 28, 2025 Page 16 D. This item has been Continued to the February 11, 2025, BCC Meeting. Recommendation to adopt an Ordinance amending the Collier County Land Development Code to establish provisions for Food Truck Parks and Mobile Food Dispensing Vehicles. (Second of two hearings) (This Item is a companion to Item #17E) E. This has been Continued to the February 11, 2025, BCC Meeting. Recommendation to approve a Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending the Administrative Code for Land Development, which was created by Ordinance No. 2013-57, by amending the administrative procedures to create an application for Mobile Food Dispensing Vehicles, Permanent, Permit. (This Item is a companion to Item #17D) F. This item has been Continued from the January 14, 2025, BCC Meeting and has been further continued and will be readvertised. Recommendation to repeal and replace Procurement Ordinance No. 2013- 69, as amended, with the attached updated Procurement Ordinance. 18. ADJOURN INQUIRIES CONCERNING CHANGES TO THE BOARD’S AGENDA SHOULD BE MADE TO THE COUNTY MANAGER’S OFFICE AT 252-8383. January 28, 2025 Page 17 MS. PATTERSON: Chair, you have a live mic. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Thank you. Well, good morning, everyone. Welcome to the Board of County Commissioners meeting on the 28th of January 2025. Just a few things real quick, some housekeeping rules. If you would, please silence your cell phones, especially because somebody's up here saying something important, we want to hear what's going on. We don't want to really hear your ringtone, whatever that may be. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I was going to say, something important today? CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Yeah, maybe. I'm hoping. I'm hoping. I'm hoping -- I think we always say something important, to somebody at least. But that being said... Item #1A INVOCATION BY PASTOR DAVID WILDMAN - GROW CHURCH ESTATES, THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE BY MARINA BERKOVICH, JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF SWFL. MS. PATTERSON: We'll begin with the invocation and the Pledge of Allegiance. Our invocation will be led by Pastor David Wildman, Grow Church Estates, and our Pledge of Allegiance will be led by Marina Berkovich, Jewish Historical Society of Southwest Florida. PASTOR WILDMAN: Let us pray. Heavenly Father, we gather here today with gratitude in our hearts for the privilege to January 28, 2025 Page 18 serve and lead this incredible community of Collier County. Thank you for the beauty and the abundance that surrounds us and for the opportunity to work together to ensure it thrives for generations to come. Lord, I lift up each leader in this room: The Commissioners, the staff, and all those who support the work of guiding this county. Grant them wisdom and discernment as they make decisions that impact the lives of so many. Strengthen their resolve to act with integrity, compassion, and courage, always seeking what is best for those they serve. As Proverbs 11:14 reminds us, people lose their way without wise leadership, but the nation succeeds and stands in victory when it has many good counselors to guide it. May this spirit of collaboration and shared wisdom guide today's discussions. We pray for the residents of Collier County, our families, educators, business owners, first responders, and every individual who contributes to the strength of our community. Protect those who protect us. Comfort those who are hurting, and grant peace to all who call this place home. As this meeting begins today, we ask your presence to fill this room. May the word spoken and decisions made reflect -- may reflect grace, humility, and a commitment to the common good. Help us to be wise stewards of the resources and opportunities you've entrusted to us, mindful of our responsibility to serve both this community and your greater purpose. In all these things, may we seek to reflect your love and truth building a county where every person can flourish, and we ask all these things in the name of Jesus. Amen. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Lead us in the Pledge of Allegiance, please. MS. BERKOVICH: Good morning, everybody. It is my honor and privilege for the first time in 40 years since I became a January 28, 2025 Page 19 naturalized U.S. Citizen to give the Pledge of Allegiance. (Applause.) COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: How'd that feel? MS. BERKOVICH: That feels great, and this is Jewish History Month. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: From what I understand, you want to say a few words since yesterday was Holocaust Recognition Day and -- COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Here, go ahead -- CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Go ahead to the podium, please, and say your name, introduce yourself to everybody here in the room, and then go ahead and -- MS. BERKOVICH: My name is Marina Berkovich. I am president of the Jewish Historical Society of Southwest Florida. Yesterday was the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the most notorious concentration camp that was used for exterminating the Jews in Europe, Auschwitz, and the president of Israel was precluded from attending the ceremony because of extreme anti-Semitism and the warrant for his arrest that is active by the International Court. I want to say that in Florida, since 2003, by Governor Jeb Bush at that time, there is a statute, 6.8 -- 6.3 -- no, 683.195 which actually declares January as the Jewish History Month, and we're always proud to celebrate it at the Jewish Historical Society, and I wish there was more publicity to it so everybody knows that this month is Jewish History Month in Southwest Florida. Thank you. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Thank you. (Applause.) CHAIRMAN KOWAL: County Manager. Item #2 January 28, 2025 Page 20 APPROVAL OF TODAY'S REGULAR, CONSENT, AND SUMMARY AGENDA AS AMENDED (EX-PARTE DISCLOSURE PROVIDED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS FOR CONSENT AGENDA.) - MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER MCDANIEL; SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOCASTRO - APPROVED AND/OR ADOPTED W/CHANGES – 4/0 (COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS ABSENT) MS. PATTERSON: We'll begin with the agenda changes for January 28th, 2025. First, we have an add-on staff report, Item 15C1. This is relative to the Juvenile Justice Circuit 20 Advisory Board County representative commissioner or their designee. This item is brought to the agenda at Commissioner LoCastro's request. Next is to continue Item 16F6 to a future meeting. This is a recommendation to approve Change Order No. 1 adding 180 days to the project time under Agreement No. 22-7951 with Chris-Tel Company of Southwest Florida, Inc., doing business as Chris-Tel Construction, to support the remaining preconstruction services for the courthouse multi-project execution contract, and authorize the chairman to sign the attached change order. This is being moved at staff's request. Continue Item 16B3 to the February 11th BCC meeting. This is a recommendation to approve and execute a purchase and sales agreement with Joseph D. Stewart, P.A., for the purchase of Unit 105, which is the last remaining available unit to purchase out of 18 condominium office units within the Court Plaza III building situated on 1.17 improved acres on Airport Road South adjacent to the government center for the Community and Human Services division. It's a companion item to 16B4, which is also being moved, which is a recommendation to approve and execute a purchase and January 28, 2025 Page 21 sales agreement and addendum with Bigi & Bigi, LLC, for the purchase of 14 out of 18 condominium office units within the Court Plaza III building situated on 1.17 improved acres on Airport Road South adjacent to the government center for the Community and Human Services division and authorize any associated budget amendments. These items both are being moved at staff's request. We do have court reporter breaks scheduled for 10:30 and again at 2:50, if necessary. And with that, County Attorney. MR. KLATZKOW: No changes, thank you. MS. PATTERSON: Commissioners, any changes, and ex parte -- ex parte on the summary and consent agenda. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Commissioner Hall, how about -- COMMISSIONER HALL: No changes and no ex parte. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Commissioner LoCastro. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: On the consent -- no changes. On the consent agenda, 16A6, I had some e-mails. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Commissioner McDaniel. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Good morning, sir. No changes and no ex parte. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Myself, no changes, and I did have meetings on 9A and 9B -- oh, I'm sorry, on the summary and ex parte, no. I jumped ahead, sorry. All right. With that, do I have a motion to approve? COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: So moved. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Second. COMMISSIONER HALL: Second. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: I have a motion and second. All in favor, signify by aye. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Aye. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Aye. January 28, 2025 Page 22 CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Aye. COMMISSIONER HALL: Aye. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Opposed, same sign, same sound. (No response.) CHAIRMAN KOWAL: The ayes have it. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Very good. Item #3A1 AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS – 20 YEAR ATTENDEES MS. PATTERSON: That brings us to Item 3, awards and recognitions. First up, our 20-year attendees, Angel Tarpley, Building Plan Review and Inspections. Congratulations. (Applause.) CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Go ahead and make your rounds. Item #3A2 AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS – 25 YEAR ATTENDEES MS. PATTERSON: That brings us to our 25-year attendees. Mr. Engelhart will be attending in February to receive his award. So next up we have Alfredo Arcia, Parks and Recreation. (Applause.) Item #7 PUBLIC COMMENTS ON GENERAL TOPICS NOT ON THE CURRENT OR FUTURE AGENDA January 28, 2025 Page 23 MS. PATTERSON: Troy, that brings us all the way to Item 7, public comments on general topics not on the current or future agenda. MR. MILLER: I have one registered speaker on this item, Tom Despard. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: I'd just remind everyone, when you come up to the podium, you get three minutes to -- either podium's fine, you can queue up at, and you'll see a little light come on when you have about 30 seconds left. And go ahead and bring your point to a close at that point. MR. DESPARD: Is this working? Okay. Ready? Thank you, Commissioners. I'm a biker and a civil engineer in the East Naples area. I have two quick comments. The -- there's a connection -- a future connection between Bayshore Drive and Sugden Park that I understand is a boardwalk. Fortunately, East Naples Park is already connected to Bayshore Drive. There are just a couple of improvements I would suggest, and I'll give this to the township manager. A need to extend the bike lane from the Botanical Garden down to Republic Street [sic]. It's about 300 feet. Because you're riding your bike down, the bike lane ends, and you have to go the cartway [sic], which is -- there's no shoulder -- or the sidewalk. When you get down to Republic Street, you make a left to get into East Naples Park. There's no signage there. It would be good to have some signage. And then at the end of Republic Drive that goes into the west Naples Park, there's a small pedestrian wooden bridge that needs to be replaced. It's about ready to fall down, actually. The culvert -- or a new bridge, and I'm suggesting it's wide January 28, 2025 Page 24 enough for maintenance vehicles to get into the park from the west side, and also some signage there would be helpful. Secondly, I was riding my bike yesterday on Danford Street, again, and this connects Thomasson, all that beautiful work on Thomasson Drive, and the beautiful Bayside Park. There's no sidewalk. People walk in the street. There's parking out here for boats and trailers and trucks, but you can't -- you can't get to the park, and so you have people walking in the street, and you have pickup trucks with trailers and boats. I'm suggesting that the sidewalk be extended from the park. There's a piece of sidewalk there that could be extended out to Thomasson Drive, and also a bike lane on the south side of Danford Street. I know staff is working on this. I just would urge these two things to become a priority for safety of the community. There also, on Danford Street, needs an overlay because there's a lot of driveways that come in that cut into the shoulder. It's not a good situation. So I know staff's looking at it, and I just would appreciate some work done on that. So thank you very much. MR. MILLER: Mr. Chair, right as he began speaking, I was handed one additional slip for this item. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Okay. That's fine. MR. MILLER: Thank you. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Thank you, sir. MR. MILLER: Cathy Lueers. MR. DESPART: Is the township manager here? CHAIRMAN KOWAL: The County Manager's right there. MS. PATTERSON: Thank you. MR. MILLER: Please start with stating your name. MS. LUEERS: Good morning. I'm Cathy Lueers. I live at 1653 tarpon Bay Drive South in North Naples. Tarpon Bay is a community that intersects with Immokalee Road. And I'm a January 28, 2025 Page 25 full-time resident. In 2001, the community was built by Lennar. My understanding is that the developer was WCI. The -- currently, Tarpon Bay pays for the maintenance of the 41 streetlights and all the irrigation and the landscaping. My understanding is that that was because at the time that it was built, it was a private road. That was our way to get out onto Immokalee Road. Since that time, about 10 years ago, if you're going down -- if you're going down Oakes -- and I have a picture here. I don't know if I'm allowed to pass this around, but if you're going down Oakes, you cannot turn left on Immokalee. You have to turn right on Immokalee and then do a U-turn at Logan to go back left. Subsequently, what that has created is it's become really a public road. What was initially designed as a private road is now a public road. So hundreds of cars a day are using it as a cut-through, yet Tarpon Bay continues to maintain it as a -- as a private road. So I'm not a lawyer or anything like that, but I was just -- I was just reading about the possibility of it being redesignated. It says here, "Any transportation facility, when so located and designated, shall become the property of the state." So I mean, it just -- I'm just wondering, do you ever reassess things or reassign them from a private road to a public road? CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Trinity might have that answer. MS. SCOTT: Trinity Scott, department head for Transportation Management Services. Commissioner, we're working with the HOA association with regard to this issue. It's been a long-standing issue. So we'll continue those discussions, and I'll make sure that I meet her out in the hallway and give her my card. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Yeah, if you could do that; meet up with Trinity, and she'll keep you in touch, and then you can pass on January 28, 2025 Page 26 any information you might have. MS. LUEERS: So, Trinity, you said you've been working on it for a long time with the HOA community? MS. SCOTT: Not for a turnover, but we'll discuss, and I'll catch you in the hallway. MS. LUEERS: Thank you, all. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Let me just chime in. This isn't -- you know, this isn't normally normal. You have your three minutes. But I have so many private roads in my district, and every single one of those communities -- because I'm working it with Trinity -- has the same request. MS. LUEERS: Okay. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: I guess I'll be the first one to say it, No. 1 is Trinity's the expert, so she's been my advisor. It's not as easy as you think to just say -- wave a magic wand. Way back when, that road was -- I have this Championship Drive which is a private road that four different communities use. Even though it's more heavily used now, it doesn't magically make it a private [sic] road. So they want a turn lane as well. Trinity and I had a meeting with all of the HOA senior leaderships, which is where she's leading you. It's a discussion. But in my particular case, a turn lane can be put in. It has to be paid for by the four different communities who use that private road. Your situation might be different. Because they also wanted a stoplight and this and that. And, you know, it's one of the deals, way back when, like you said, when your community -- but one of the things I've told my constituents when they say, "Oh, the county, to take it over and do this and that," the county doesn't take it over. Taxpayers do. So if we all of a sudden took it over and then took care of all the January 28, 2025 Page 27 maintenance and everything -- not impossible, but she is the guru, and she has helped me immensely. But at least in my cases, the citizens were disappointed thinking that it was just, you know, we put in a resolution or an ordinance or something, and then all of a sudden the county takes over. But you're talking to definitely the right person. And I've been dealing with this in six different areas of my -- and I'm sure the other commissioners as well. But thanks for bringing it up. And now you've at least connected, you can separate rumor from fact. MS. LUEERS: Thank you. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Yes, ma'am. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Thank you. COMMISSIONER HALL: On the other hand, I say it's Commissioner Saunders' district. Just ask for whatever you want. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: I make a motion to make the public road private -- or the private road public. All in favor? CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Where is he at? COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: That's a good one. I was wondering why today just felt so much more efficient, right? Everything's just running great and everything. Commissioner Kowal, hats off to you, sir. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: He's in an undisclosed location. He can't phone in. County Manager. Item #9A RESOLUTION 2025-29: A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING PLOT N OF THE ROSEMARY CEMETERY AS HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT, PURSUANT TO THE HISTORIC/ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVATION January 28, 2025 Page 28 REGULATIONS AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 2.03.07.E OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, APPROXIMATELY .02± ACRES, IS LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PINE RIDGE ROAD AND GOODLETTE FRANK ROAD, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PL20240009511 (THIS ITEM IS A COMPANION TO ITEM #9B) - MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER MCDANIEL; SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOCASTRO - ADOPTED 4/0 (COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS ABSENT) Item #9B RESOLUTION 2025-30: A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING PLOT W OF THE ROSEMARY CEMETERY AS HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT, PURSUANT TO THE HISTORIC/ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVATION REGULATIONS AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 2.03.07.E OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, APPROXIMATELY .04± ACRES, IS LOCATED SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 592 FEET EAST OF US 41, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PL20240009512. (THIS ITEM IS A COMPANION TO ITEM #9A) - MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER MCDANIEL; SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOCASTRO - ADOPTED 4/0 (COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS ABSENT) Item #11A January 28, 2025 Page 29 QUIT CLAIM DEEDS FOR TWO OUTLYING PARCELS OF LAND WHICH WERE ORIGINALLY PART OF ROSEMARY CEMETERY, LOCATED SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD BETWEEN US 41 AND GOODLETTE-FRANK ROAD, AT A COST NOT TO EXCEED $62.50 FOR RECORDING OF THE DEEDS. (THIS ITEM IS A COMPANION TO ITEMS #9A & #9B; CONTINUED FROM THE DECEMBER 10, 2024, BCC MEETING) - MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER MCDANIEL; SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOCASTRO - APPROVED 4/0 (COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS ABSENT) MS. PATTERSON: Commissioners, that brings us to items -- our advertised public hearings, Items 9A, 9B, and then 11A is a companion item. I will read these quickly into the record. Item 9A has been continued from the December 10th, 2024, BCC meeting. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by commission members. This is a recommendation to approve a resolution designating Plot N of the Rosemary Cemetery as historically significant pursuant to the historic/archeological preservation regulations as provided in Section 2.03.07.E of the Collier County Land Development Code. The subject property, approximately .02 plus/minus acres, is located at the southwest corner of Pine Ridge Road and Goodlette-Frank Road in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. It's a companion item to 9B, which was also continued December 10th, 2024. This is a recommendation to approve a resolution designating Plot W of the Rosemary Cemetery as historically significant pursuant to the historic/archaeological preservation regulations as provided in Section 2.03.07.E of the Collier County Land Development Code. January 28, 2025 Page 30 And finally, its other -- its last companion is Item 11A, which is a recommendation to approve and accept quit claim deeds for two outlying parcels of the land which were originally part of Rosemary Cemetery located south of Pine Ridge Road between U.S. 41 and Goodland-Frank Road at a cost not to exceed the $62.50 for recording of the deeds. With that, we need to swear everybody in, correct, Court Reporter? So those that are going to be -- and then we'll do ex parte. Those that are going to be participating, could you please stand to be sworn in? That would be anybody that wants to speak as well. THE COURT REPORTER: Do you swear or affirm the testimony you will give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) MS. PATTERSON: And with that, we'll do the ex parte. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: All right. Commissioner Hall, do you have anything on these two items? COMMISSIONER HALL: I have no ex parte. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Commissioner LoCastro. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Yeah, I have no ex parte. I haven't heard anything about this. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: How about Commissioner McDaniel? COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: No ex parte. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Well, I actually do. I have -- 9A and 9B, I have meetings. Believe it or not, this was -- this was brought to my attention about a year and a half ago by the young gentleman in the Boy Scout uniform down there in the second row, and he had asked to come see me in my office, and he filled me in, enlightened me. I didn't even know this actually existed. I knew there was the one cemetery that was closer to 41 on Pine Ridge Road next to the January 28, 2025 Page 31 CVS there, and it was fenced in with the two markers there. But I was not aware of the other parcel that was used, I guess, that was further east of that intersection. And this is the one in question, I believe, we're talking about today. So he kind of enlightened me, but that particular meeting is the one I had with him. So I think we'll hear from him today. So if you go ahead. I guess, staff, go ahead and go first. MS. PATTERSON: Yeah. We have Mr. Bosi, Director of Planning and Zoning, will begin the presentation. MR. BOSI: Good morning. Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director. I was going to introduce the item. County Manager did an extremely efficient job. So I won't repeat that. This was heard by the Historical Archaeological Preservation board in October of 2024. Recommendation of 5-0 to designate the two plots historically significant. It qualifies under Criteria No. 3 within the Land Development Code specifically related to ceremonial burial type of remnants of places has been cited. As we said, this qualifies for it. And specifically, I want to turn this over to Ms. Amanda Townsend, your director of Museums, who's going to give you a little more specificity of the history of these two plots. MS. TOWNSEND: Good morning, Commissioners. Amanda Townsend, the director of your Collier County Museums, for the record. I want to orient you a little bit to Rosemary Cemetery. This is a good-news item, we hope. And I apologize that this is difficult to read, but it is the best historical record we have of Rosemary Cemetery. And it is a survey completed by City Engineer Cambier in 1944. So age hasn't been kind to it. But we'll do our best to walk through it. January 28, 2025 Page 32 This page is divided in half, and on the top half, you'll see the platting of the entire cemetery. So when the cemetery was platted, it was 30 acres, and Pine Ridge Road was its northern edge, U.S. 41 was its western edge, and the railroad tracks, because Goodlette-Frank Road didn't exist at the time, were its eastern boundary. You'll see in the -- on the far left-hand corner, there are some other little bubbles there. Those translate to, on the bottom half of the page, the sort of rounded corner parcel that you see. That's the Unit B of Rosemary Cemetery that most of us, if we're familiar with it at all, are familiar with, and that's the portion that is in front of the CVS at the corner of 41 and Pine Ridge. However, there were two -- according to the engineer, Cambier's records, there were two other parcels of the cemetery that did have burials in them, and those are a tee-tiny little L-shaped parcel about a quarter of the way across, and then a tee-tiny little rectangular parcel all the way over by the railroad tracks, and those are known on the survey as Plots W and Plots N. Those were never made into county property and have never truly been recognized as burial sites, although they were all part of the original cemetery. We know many of the people who are buried in Plot B. And let me give you -- real quickly here. There is an aerial of what Plot W looks like and a few photographs. It's there in front of a shopping plaza, and there's an aerial of what Rosemary Plot N looks like. It's just inside the right-of-way at the corner of Pine Ridge and Goodlette-Frank. We know a little bit about who's buried in most of the plots except for Plot N. Unit B reads like a who's who of early Naples residents. You'll recognize last names of Weeks and Leonard and Kirkland and Hatcher, all families that were very, very early settles here -- early settlers here. January 28, 2025 Page 33 Plot W, we also know who many of those folks are, not all of them, though. Some of their -- some of what's on the survey is really just illegible. And then what the surveyor put on Plot W is that there are eight unknown African-Americans buried there. We'd like to see -- move forward and recognize all of those people, and so we would ask for your consideration to accept the historic designations and the quit claim deeds on these properties. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Thank you. Any questions from the Board? COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: No question. I do have a comment. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: You have a comment. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I do. I do. And if you'd go back to the previous map for me, please, if you would, or that -- MS. TOWNSEND: W or N or the whole thing? COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: The aerial photo that you have there. And in the description, Unit B is the actual cemetery that's over by the CVS now? MS. TOWNSEND: Uh-huh. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Okay. All right. And this is just a little -- a little addition to the -- to the history of this particular site. And I hope that that is the young man that actually went through, did the research, and designated the grave plots that are there. Your favorite County Commissioner, back in the late '80s, early '90s, was the developer of this corner right here where -- there was an Eckert's store that was coming in there, and I proposed to relocate this cemetery to the museum site here on campus. That was, unbeknownst to me, a very contentious suggestion. I actually got -- this was way, way before I was a commish. But I January 28, 2025 Page 34 actually got death threats on the premise of relocating great granddaddy's remains to the shadow of the jail. We then learned -- after I found out that a relocation was not even going to become possible, we then learned that it was a county cemetery. And so we had it designated as a historical site. There was an Eagle Scout that came and marked -- or searched the gravesites and marked the gravesites. And then the county actually spent some money on it, finally, because it was a terrible cemetery. It was just terrible. And, you know of course, me, I didn't think that being next to a six-lane highway was a nice place to go visit the remains of your loved ones, and I thought maybe a quieter place here at the museum was a better location, but it certainly didn't transpire that way. So we ended up leaving the cemeteries where they were. I didn't realize that the plots that are over along Goodlette were not included in that acquisition and fenced off and marked as well. So are both -- my question is, are both of the cemeteries now historically designated? MS. TOWNSEND: With your approval today, all three parcels will be historically designated and become private -- or public property, excuse me. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Good. I know we have public comment coming, but I'll be happy to support that. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: They probably didn't like the idea, because, you know, those words "final resting place" is usually used. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yeah. Well, you know -- CHAIRMAN KOWAL: You know, I don't want to say anything. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Was the Weeks -- the Weeks family that were really upset. Madison Weeks is one of the named ones in Unit B, and he was originally buried in the 1800s next to St. January 28, 2025 Page 35 Ann's Church, and when they expanded St. Ann's Church -- and, of course, if you'll remember, in the 1800s you were lucky to get a pine box. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Burt would remember. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yes. Well, Burt's not here. Burt's not here, so... In the 1800s, you were lucky to get a pine box. Most people were wrapped in rags and placed in the ground, and so there he was next to St. Ann's Church downtown. Well, when they expanded St. Ann's Church and built the annex, they went to get him and relocate him up here to this site -- because Pine Ridge was -- everybody went quail hunting in what is now Pine Ridge Estates. And they went to get Madison Weeks, and he wasn't there, of course. So they took a ceremonial full -- I actually read the newspaper article where they took a ceremonial shovelful of dirt and put it in a box, here he lies, and they brought him up and put him in this particular cemetery. So it was -- it was a rather interesting experience to go through that whole process. So I'm really, really happy that we're actually acknowledging these additional sites that are over on what is now Goodlette. Because back when this was all transpiring, you know, Goodlette Road wasn't even there. It was the old railroad tracks. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Any other questions for staff? Comments? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Okay. We'll go ahead and listen to the public speakers. Troy. MR. MILLER: Mr. Chair, we have three registered speakers for this item. Your first speaker is Lois Bolin, and she'll be followed January 28, 2025 Page 36 by Jonathan Rodriguez. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Good morning. MS. BOLIN: Good morning. Lois Bolin. Do you want my address? CHAIRMAN KOWAL: No. MS. BOLIN: Lois Bolin, okay, fine. Dan's my commissioner. District 4. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Everybody knows you. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Yeah, we know you. MS. BOLIN: I am really delighted to have -- No. 1, to have invited Marina Berkovich to give the Pledge because of International Holocaust Day. I was doubly excited to see this on the Commissioners' agenda. For the past roughly 10 years I've been -- every Christmas I put up wreaths on all of the gravesites and on the gates into Rosemary Cemetery at 41, and I also put wreaths on all of the four markers that are there. I didn't realize it wasn't part of -- and I'm going to call Ms. Amanda. I'd like to do my next article on this -- wasn't part of it, so I'm delighted to see that it's going to be, and I think when it does, maybe we could have, like, a little celebration and do some really good picture to bring some -- bring some notoriety to it. And I wish I'd been around when you made that suggestion. I'm sorry I laughed out loud because I was thinking, "Oh, Lord, have mercy" that you would even try to think about moving -- because they'd already been moved once. They wouldn't want to be moved again, and we know how those pioneers used to be, God love them. Anyway, thank you for bringing this up. Congratulations. Congratulations, young man, and thank you for all -- thank you for all you do. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Thank you. MR. MILLER: Your next speaker is Jonathan Rodriguez, and January 28, 2025 Page 37 he will be followed by Vincent Keeys. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Good morning. Whoop. You broke our mic. MR. RODRIGUEZ: Good morning, County Commissioners. My name is Jonathan Rodriguez. I am a junior at Lorenzo Walker Technical High School. I am also in the HVAC program of their college, and I'm also a freshman at Florida Southwestern State College. I am also a proud Boy Scout in Troop 2 -- these are some of my troop leaders right here -- and trying to earn my Eagle Scout. Now, the Eagle Scout rank is the highest attainable rank in the Scouts VSA program. It is achieved by less than 5 percent of Scouts nationwide. To earn this prestigious rank, Scouts must complete at least 21 merit badges, including 14 mandatory merit badges. While demonstrating leadership service and Scout spirit, reciprocants [sic] of the rank are awarded a badge and a metal with opportunities to earn additional recognition through Eagle Palms. The first Eagle Scout badge was awarded in 1912 to Arthur Eldred of Brooklyn, New York. Notable Eagle Scouts include Neil Armstrong, who was the first person to walk on the moon. The rank represents a commitment to community service, leadership, and character development. I am honored to stand here before you and present to you my Eagle Scout project, Project Reverence. In the early 1920s, a parcel of land was donated to Collier County by Mr. Crayton for the establishment of the Collier County second cemetery named Rosemary Cemetery. Reflecting the social norms at the time, segregation extended even to burial grounds. Along the railroad tracks in the intersection now known as Pine Ridge and Goodlette-Frank Road, the first African-Americans were interned. For my Eagle Scout project, I have chosen to bring attention to January 28, 2025 Page 38 Plot N of the Rosemary Cemetery. For years, Ms. Amanda Townsend of the Collier County Museum, along with Mr. Keeys, the president of the NAACP, have been trying to bring attention to this abandoned hallowed ground. I have joined in their efforts to bring attention to this abandoned hallowed ground, and I have also raised over $18,000 to go towards this project of mine, with the help of people who are willing to give up money. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Nice. MR. RODRIGUEZ: Restoring the abandoned segregated cemeteries is an essential act of justice, dignity, and historical preservation, which is the American way. These cemeteries, often neglected and forgotten, serve as a silent witness to the deep racial divisions and equalities [sic] of the past. By restoring them, we acknowledge the lives and legacies of those who were marginalized and denied equal treatment in life. Such restoration not only honors their memory but also helps to heal and educate communities, providing an opportunity for reflection, understanding, and reconciliation. It is a crucial step in addressing the historical wounds of segregation and ensuring that all individuals, regardless of race, are remembered with respect and reverence. Thank you, all. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Thank you. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Thank you. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Thank you. (Applause.) MR. MILLER: Your next and final speaker -- COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Mr. Chair, can I just say, why don't all the commissioners come down here and we take a picture. This young man, talk about eloquence at the podium. We have meetings here every two weeks, and you have people that come up January 28, 2025 Page 39 here that, you know, they're not a young -- young man like this. They've done so many things. I've got to just commend you for just how eloquent and mature and impressive you've been. Let's take a picture with you down here. UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: That's my grandson. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Oh, wait. Absolutely not. Just us. UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: Future president of the United States. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Might be. Might be. (Applause.) COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Crystal, do we need to audit his books, 18,000? Is there anything we need to do it legally? MS. KINZEL: Transactional. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Okay, okay. That's what I thought, too. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: All right. I believe Mr. Keeys still wants -- MR. KEEYS: Good morning, County Commissioners, Ms. Patterson, staff. It's an honor to be back here in front of you today. I promise not to be so eloquent. Jonathan has done a fantastic job. We are here in support of his efforts. I want to really stand in and thank you, the County Commissioners, for your hard work, but especially I want to thank the museum and the Historical Archaeological Review Board. We've come together with another great public/private partnership. I think a lot of the hard work has already been done. And we are here to hear your acceptance in going forth with this resolution. Our recommendation for this county: To become the greatest county ever throughout the United States, and we want to be that January 28, 2025 Page 40 model county. So I'm really here just to thank you, thank the Collier County Museums, and especially that young man, Jonathan Rodriguez. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Amen. MR. KEEYS: Thank you so very much. Have a great day. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Thank you, Mr. Keeys. I'd just like to make a quick comment. You know, several of us up here, like I said -- you know, early on I knew the one cemetery that was closer to 41 and Pine Ridge, not thinking that, you know, the other one existed, and then when it was brought to my attention and not realizing that it wasn't even part of the original cemetery and was not preserved. And just by the young gentleman coming to my office working on his Eagle Scout badge brought that attention upon us. You know, as a governing body, sometimes we overlook some of these things or don't even realize they're not even already taken care of. So, you know, this is what's so important about our public being involved with our local government, being aware, bringing things to our attention. Because we move very fast. We have a lot of things -- today's not going to be a very, very heavy agenda. Maybe they did that on purpose because it was my fill-in day. But these type of things, you know, sometimes gets lost in our busy, busy days every day of running this county. So it helps to have the public bring some of these things forward so we can take a deeper dive and make sure, that, you know, if it's something that needs to be done, we get it done, and especially a feel-good item like this to recognize the people that sacrificed their lives early on in the building of this county and this nation and that -- you know, that died in -- I believe some of these people, from what I understand, were helping build the railroad at the time? COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: That's right. January 28, 2025 Page 41 CHAIRMAN KOWAL: And, you know, their sacrifice, you know, led to their demise even though they were trying to do something to benefit, you know, the area that we all live in now that brought forth and, you know, became what we are today. So I just -- with that being said -- I don't know. Do I have any other comments or -- it looks like Mr. McDaniel lit up again. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I have just one little thing. And, you know, on the other side of the equation, I actually developed that plaza that's there as well. You see how far off it's set off of Goodlette Road? We had to acknowledge that those gravesites were, in fact, there and set that plaza back with all the landscaping and parking and everything as well, and it never dawned on me that it wasn't included in the original designation for what Amanda designated as Unit B. It never dawned on me that these gravesites weren't actually included in that. So I couldn't be happier -- couldn't be happier that you're doing what you're doing. And we are, hopefully -- and with that, I'll make a motion for approval, unless you want to do it. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Well, Commissioner LoCastro. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: I have a question for you, really, just to understand the history of this, because I don't go back, you know, as far as you or are as plugged in in this. The idea you had way back when that caught so many spears and rocks -- and this is more of an opinionated answer. But I'm just kind of curious, you know, as this area's developed, would that have been the right thing to do? It was just bad timing and nobody could see -- sort of see the future, and now you're sitting here with a cemetery that's surrounded by all this commercial and, you know -- I mean -- you know, if my grandfather was buried there and it was an empty piece of land that was wide open, that's exactly where I'd want to keep him way back then, but I'm not sure I want him to be next January 28, 2025 Page 42 door to a, you know, commercial strip mall. What's your thought now as you leap into the future? Would that have been something that you wish you -- that people would have understood more? COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: You know -- and, Commissioner, you're asking it for an opinionated answer here, and everyone, as has been stated, has a different opinion. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Yeah. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: It certainly wouldn't be my wish to have my loved one's remains next to a six-lane highway. But be that as it may, they are. And the fact that we're actually designating this as a historical site, it accomplishes the goal and provides for proper -- or proper designation. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: I wasn't trying to put you on the spot -- COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: No, no. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: -- but these kind of things pop up where sometimes we get all this pushback but it's like -- you know, sometimes our position is we're trying to have people sort of look into a crystal ball and see what we're trying to sort of see, and it just seemed like a very similar example to some other things that sometimes fall on a deaf ear, and then our replacements 20 years from now are sitting up here saying, "Who were those idiots 20 years ago that weren't smart enough to" -- but, you know, I realize there's more things. Like I said, I wasn't putting you on the spot. But we've already had things that have been presented that seemed ridiculous. But then we kind of go behind the wall and go, "You know what, in 20 years our replacements are going to say, 'Why didn't these guys sort of do it?'" But like you said, we're doing all the things now. Thank you. I was just curious of your perspective. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: All right. Thank you. January 28, 2025 Page 43 COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Motion to approve. Do we want to do them in bulk, 9A, 9B, and 11A? CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Ask Jeff. MS. PATTERSON: Jeff? County Attorney. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: 11 also? MS. PATTERSON: 9A, 9B and 11A. MR. KLATZKOW: Yes. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: I'll second. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: All right. So I have a motion, I have a second. All in favor, signify by aye. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Aye. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Aye. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Aye. COMMISSIONER HALL: Aye. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Opposed, same sign, same sound. (No response.) CHAIRMAN KOWAL: It passes unanimously. Well, four. (Applause.) Item #9C RESOLUTION 2025-31: THE 2024 COMBINED ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT ON PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 6.02.02 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND SECTION 163.3177(3)(B), FLORIDA STATUTES AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION THAT UPDATES THE 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE. (PL20240010770) RESOLUTION 2025-31: MOTION TO APPROVE AND ACCEPT THE AUIR AND CIE PRESENTATIONS W/DISCUSSION January 28, 2025 Page 44 REGARDING CIGM (COLLIER INTERACTIVE GROWTH MODEL) FOR INCLUSION IN THE FUTURE BY COMMISSIONER MCDANIEL; SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HALL – ADOPTED 4/0 (COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS ABSENT) MS. PATTERSON: Commissioners, that brings us to 9C. This item was also continued from the December 10th, 2024, BCC meeting. This is a recommendation to review and approve the 2024 combined Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities and Schedule of Capital Improvements as provided for in Section 6.02.02 of the Collier County Land Development Code, and Section 163.3177(3)(b), Florida Statutes, and adopt a resolution that updates the 5-year capital improvement schedule. Mr. Bosi, your Director of Planning and Zoning, is here to present. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Troy, do we have any public speakers on this? MR. MILLER: We do not, sir. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Thank you. MR. BOSI: Thank you, County Manager. Mike Bosi, director of Planning and Zoning. Tough following such feel-good agenda items that we just had, but what I would say is this is another feel-good item that doesn't get a lot of attention amongst the public but most certainly affects the public most directly on a daily basis. And what am I talking about? I'm talking about the AUIR/CIE. AUIR is the Annual Update and Inventory Report, and the CIE is our Capital Improvement Element. And why do I say that this is something that affects our population, or citizens, on a daily basis? Because these are the new roads, these are the utility projects, these January 28, 2025 Page 45 are the new parks, these are the new police stations, these are the new -- these are your new EMS stations, your new government buildings, your libraries to be able to handle the projected demand that we expect over the next five and 10 years. So when we get the public who comes in during a rezoning process and asks, "Well, do we -- do we make sure that we have enough capacity to be able to handle the loads that we are?" and we can tell them with an honest face that we do, that we administer a Concurrency Management System that requires before a plat is issued, before a Site Development Plan is approved that we can ensure that we have the capacity from our infrastructure providers to be able to accommodate the additional demands that that project's going to be demanding from our infrastructure providers. So the AUIR, it's an annual one-year snapshot in time of projected needs and required capital improvements for the next five years based upon the projected population increases against the adopted level of service that the Board of County Commissioners has designated. It should be noted that this snapshot changes as changes in the demand equation evolve. It's a constantly changing equation, but what we do is every year we give you your annual look at what we need to -- what we need to build to be able to handle those additional demands as I was speaking about. And what's included within it? The concurrency management facilities, that's roads, drainage, potable water, wastewater, solid waste, parks and recreation, and schools. And then we have our Category B facilities: Jails, law enforcement, libraries, EMS, and government buildings. And then finally C, which is our beaches and inlets. Concurrency, and that's facilities and services necessary to maintain the adopted level of service are available when the impacts January 28, 2025 Page 46 of development occur, which are contained within the CIE policy and the Land Development Code. This is what I was talking about. That's where we -- before we issue an approval of a development order of a plat or an SDP, we ensure that we have the capacity within our Category A facilities to be able to handle those additional demands. And how do we project what those demands are going to be? We coordinate with the University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research, affectionately known as BEBR. Per the -- per the direction of BEBR, we utilize the medium-range projections for the population. You've got a high, a medium, and a low. For the early part of the aughts, we were at the high level. About 2008, right when the Great Recession was starting to hit, we switched down to a medium. We've been medium population ever since. But we also know that we've got -- we're in January. We know it's seasonal population. That seasonal population is an additional demand that's going to be placed against our infrastructure. So we have to be able to handle that additional demand utilizing traffic counts, utilizing water usage, wastewater usage, garbage collections. What we've been able to determine, our seasonal population is a 20 percent increase. So when we -- when we gauge the expected demand, we have to factor in an additional 20 percent for our seasonal population. And then how much do we build? We always utilize the libraries because it's pretty straightforward. It's new population times your level of service, and that's your capital improvement project. So for this five-year period, BEBR's projecting that we have 30,131 people. The level of service that's adopted for libraries is .33 square feet per person. So that's 30,131 times .33 square feet, and January 28, 2025 Page 47 that -- we need 9,943 additional square footage of libraries to be able to handle those demands. Now, that's one of the more -- I don't want to say simplistic, but direct. There's some more factors that we utilize when we get to the transportation, utilities. I'll hit on that. Right before that, I wanted to talk about our permanent populations. What we've been receiving from the state over the past six years in terms of what's the consistency that we've been dealing with. And if you look at it, look at the third column to the -- to the right, the five-year growth total. And I think most people would be surprised, but what the University of Florida's population projections have provided for is we are slowing down in our population. You look in 2019, they expected 36,000 people for that five-year period. 2023, that was down to 28,000. For 2024, it's at 30,000. And if you look all the way on the right, which is your growth percent annualized, you can see in the past three years we've dropped down below that -- that one point -- one and a half percent annual growth rate. It doesn't mean we're not growing. It just means that the pace of our growth has changed a little bit. And what -- I think a lot of why that is is because of where we're at within our buildout. The urbanized area is not built out, but it is closer to buildout than it is to just starting. And because of that, the opportunities for large-scale development in your urbanized areas are limited. Where you have those opportunities for large subdivisions and larger projects are out in your eastern lands and within your Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District further removed from your urbanized area, and what we've found is those towns and villages that are associated with those subdistricts are on a much slower pace in terms of what their absorption is in terms of reaching their full buildout. But what it January 28, 2025 Page 48 does do, it allows us every year to take this same snapshot to make sure how are we doing, how are we -- how are we providing for the necessary growth that we need to harness, and also how are we going to plan for it and make sure that we have the revenue to be able to pay for all of the expenditures. As I said, not only was it population, but levels of service is also based upon other areas. Roads and bridges utilize traffic counts at multiple times per year and also a trip bank for your reserved capacity. So it's not only the -- it's not only the population projections, but it's your -- it's your traffic counts that we're getting at the various stations, but also what's being banked within in terms of already approved projects that will dictate, you know, what that level of service is and what your demand is. For your wastewater and your water, we use historical demand usage and population projections plus an additional capacity reserve. There was an issue in 2001 of overcapacity on -- overutilization of our wastewater system. Because of that, we were instructed to be a little bit more cautious and conservative, meaning have a higher percentage of the facilities available than what we are projecting so we would not have a failure. It's one thing to have -- to wait in line for a swing at the playground in terms of making sure you have adequate facilities, but if you're -- if your wastewater or your water facilities aren't working when your citizens need them, it's a much bigger problem. So the wastewater and water are an influence and gauged in a little bit different capacity. Within your stormwater, it's your basin studies of the water management -- of the water management plan. Solid waste is your landfill disposable [sic] capacity. And your coastal zone is your adopted plans and sustainability standards. For this CIE, we have over $2.6 billion worth of improvements January 28, 2025 Page 49 planned. On the right, you can see that between our Transportation Department and our Stormwater Department, we have just over $624 million worth of unidentified funding that is what shows up more on your four and five year of your CIE. The projects that we have moving forward that are banking our capacity, such as Vanderbilt Beach Road extension, those are fully funded. It's the projects in years 4 and 5 that we haven't identified those fundings for. So the CIE that we have provided for you gives you the capacity to continue issuing building permits and COs over the next 12 months, and this -- this slide is to help inform you as you transition to February -- as you transition to February and your budgetary discussions, recognizing that there is a shortfall within your capital improvements, and those will help inform and fill in some of the details of your overall budget program that you're going to be reviewing in February, ultimately, in making decisions in January and September of this year as well. In the recommendations that are in your executive summary, to accept and recommend approval of the attached document as the 2024 Annual Update and Inventory Report on public facilities, to accept and recommend approval of the Category A, B, C facilities related to projects and revenue sources. And within your Category A, set forth inclusion within the Schedule of Capital Improvement Elements of your annual CIE update and amendment. What we do with that is send that to the Department of Commerce. They don't provide a -- they don't provide a commentary. We provide it as a courtesy. But like I said, it's an important step in the sense of adopting your capital improvement program that's going to allow for us to issue those building permits and COs over the 12-month period until we hear the AUIR again next year. January 28, 2025 Page 50 And with that, any questions you may have for the overview. We have representatives of the divisions here if you have any questions on any one specific area. However the Board would like to proceed further, staff will adjust. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Commissioner McDaniel. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yes. Good morning. Good morning, Mr. Bosi. MR. BOSI: Good morning. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: My question is, not once did you mention the CIGM in this process, and that's Collier Interactive Growth Model that we have adopted and been utilizing as an additional tool. But what has led us down a rabbit hole of lacking in infrastructure is not properly estimating the population and then, in fact, its dispersal throughout the community. As you mentioned earlier, you know, growth comes and goes in different waves. Do we need to amend our policies to bring in the model as a more primary utilization for a planning tool? MR. BOSI: And -- Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director, again. I would say that is a contemplation. We've had discussion over the past five to six to seven years as to whether we wanted to propose to the Department of Commerce an alternative to the BEBR medium population growth, for instance. The CIGM is recognized by the Department of Commerce, prior the Department of Economic Opportunity, as an acceptable alternative for population. So they've given us an indication that we can move in that direction. We've just never had that specific directive from the Board of County Commissioners to take that -- to take the next step. What I would say is, the CIGM, where we utilize the CIGM most for our planning processes is within our master planning, within January 28, 2025 Page 51 our LRTP, within our parks master plan, within our jails master plans, within all the master plans of our individual infrastructure providers, because we'll get a 5- and 10-year lookout from BEBR, but that's it. Mr. Farmer and Metro Forecasting can provide all the way to buildout, and the distribution of that population is the most valuable aspect that we find. Where is -- in 25 years, where do we expect those hot spots, so we start identifying and acquiring property for infrastructure and set asides in those regards. So that's a long answer to say, if the Board directed us to make that transition, I think that there would be a positive receptivity from -- from the Department of Commerce. But the utilization primarily from our planning purposes for the CIGM has more been on the long range. The way that we do our allocations for our 5- and our 10-year population is we use regression analysis. So we look at the last three years of COs that have been issued every year that we get our population, and for these -- for the 30,131 people that we expect over five years, we look at that pattern of COs, where have they occurred, and that gives us clues as to how we distribute the population in the short term. The CIGM is a little bit different. They utilize -- they utilize the land-use designation from the Future Land Use Element, zoning designation, as well as current trends and trend analysis in terms of retail, commercial, industrial development. So I would say in, I guess, a long way, is we can make that decision, but what -- where staff has really utilized the CIGM has been more on the long-range side of the shop, and on the short-term -- because really when you get down to the CIE, it's your first two years. It's your first two years that are really giving you the capacity. And staff is comfortable with the past 25 years of utilizing January 28, 2025 Page 52 that regression analysis to kind of dictate where the future growth is going to be in a five-year period, but we do rely upon the CIE when it gets -- you know, when it gets five years and beyond. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Well, just so we don't mess with what we're doing today, I would suggest that maybe we have another agenda item at some stage, bring in Metro Forecasting and have a look at their data. Of the things -- because I'm extremely intimate with the CIGM. It was -- it was founded back when I chaired the East of 951 Horizon Study back in 2008, and we utilized the specific land uses and house -- rooftops as we were actually designating and determining populations and then the dispersal. The second portion of why I really like the CIGM, the Collier Interactive Growth Model, is its modeling component, because we have been able to utilize that apparatus to do forecasting for properties that already exist that have a land designation of green on the map, which is one unit per five or one unit per 10, and we can pretend turn it to pink, which is one per one, or a higher density, and then it flows out with dispersals of population. So let's -- with -- and I'll make a motion for approval and acceptance of the -- of the AUIR and the CIE presentation. And then maybe someday we'll have a -- at a later date we'll have another discussion and actually have a hard look at the CIGM and see if we can actually implement it into some of our shorter-term plans. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: So I have a motion, Commissioner McDaniel, for what's before us right now. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Correct. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: But, Commissioner Hall, you have a comment? COMMISSIONER HALL: Yes, I do. Thank you, Chairman. Taking a look at this, this is my third AUIR, and I understand January 28, 2025 Page 53 the process. I understand what the purpose of it is, but when I read through this thing, I get an overwhelming -- just an overwhelming feeling of I don't know enough. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: You need to read more. COMMISSIONER HALL: I mean, it's -- I don't want to belabor it. I don't want to stop our process. But going forward, maybe include the CIGM. If we have to do a workshop, if we have to bring in the division directors to get specific -- what the specific -- I mean, we're looking at zero to five years. We can't even turn around in five years with -- in government. I mean, we've got roads. You've got transportation needs. You've got stormwater needs. I don't even -- you know, what are the transportation needs in four or five years at a $625 million deficit? I mean, those are the specifics that I would like to get into. Instead of just saying, "We have these needs, and we're going to go into debt for them," I'd really like to know what they are. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Yeah. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Yeah. COMMISSIONER HALL: And, you know, the BEBR reports, I'm sure that they're accurate to some extent, but I call BS on them because they're calling for a decrease in our population. But since COVID, I mean, we've seen extraordinary growth, not just -- I mean 20 percent in season? I live on 41. It's -- it's a bigger increase than 20 percent. I mean, I could live with just an extra car out of -- you know, an extra two cars out of 10, but there's not an extra two cars out of 10. There's -- it's over doubled in the amount of traffic that comes through here. I don't think anybody's going to argue with me on that. You know, you've got -- in the AUIR, you've got Category B, you know, the jails. There's still not specific information for the January 28, 2025 Page 54 increase in mental health beds at the jail. I'm not talking about David Lawrence Center; that's a separate issue. But there's -- you know, we don't even have specifics about male and female care. There's, you know, jury rooms that the Clerk brought up yesterday that are not even included. You know, we're going to add a judge, but we have no place to put anybody. So those are the kind of specifics that I would like to see us -- if we're going to be approving the future of Collier County, I would kind of like to -- need to know those type of things. The levels of service, I get it. You know, you have to have -- you have to have something to throw a dart at. So I get the level-of-service, you know, calculation. But to say we're going to add 30,000 people in Collier County and we need another 10,000 square feet of libraries, I call BS. We're underutilized in the libraries that we have. So those are just some of the things I'd like to be able to sit down and talk about and bring to an awareness of and get a solid plan going forward, because four and five years is not very far at all. I mean, it takes us that long to do a study, which gets on my nerves. But I'm not going to belabor the point, but I just want to make those comments because I'd like to see us going forward, get specific, and do something smart. And with that, I'll second the motion. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: All right. I have a second. Commissioner LoCastro. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Thank you, Chairman. My comment's specific to this, but the comment's a little bit more generic. I agree with Commissioner Hall, there's times where I look at the agenda -- and you guys know this, and we all do -- and I read the paragraph on here, and sometimes I drill down, you know, often, you know, to get more info, but then I'll reach out to staff with January 28, 2025 Page 55 an e-mail or "please come by my office," and you do it for all of us. But that educates us on a complicated topic like this and others, but not the general public. They don't have the benefit of that, like, private meeting in our office or that drill-down. And in here in a public forum, just like Commissioner Hall is saying, we're about to say yay or nay to something that's this big. So my comment is just a little bit more generic, not specifically towards this, but using this as an example, that when we see things that are on the agenda that are sort of bigger than a breadbox, that even though it seems like a fast vote because we've all had behind-the-scenes meetings -- and it's like, "Hey, remember that thing we all talked about? All in favor? Aye." You know, to put a little thought and say, if this was briefed to a stranger at this public meeting, and by a "stranger" I mean citizens, is there a little more we can add? Not a three-hour presentation, but an extra slide, a little drill-down. Like Commissioner Hall was saying, "Hey, educate me a little more as if I didn't know anything and I didn't have a meeting." One of the things we've promised the citizens is that these meetings would be more transparent, you know, more informative. And so I'm not trying to make the meeting an 11-hour meeting, but there are many things that pop up that I knew nothing about, I had a meeting with you-all, now I'm fully educated, but then we're about to vote on it, and the masses and even, you know, we have journalists that are Zoomed in right now listening to what we're voting on, and then we get, you know, half a dozen e-mails going, "That thing you voted on, what was all that about?" So I'm just saying in the future that if something sort of jumps out that -- a little extra line or something -- and this is part of my generic comment -- in the agenda or, more importantly, in the presentation here, even if we're hearing it for the second time, chances are the masses aren't. January 28, 2025 Page 56 You know, the Clerk of Court sends us a -- sends us the agenda with her comments as she does a deeper dive, and that sort of educates us more, but the masses don't see that. So it's more of generic comment because, you know, like the acronym that you just used, yeah, we've heard it, but the public, you know, doesn't know what that means. So just to give it some thought a little bit. And, Mr. Bosi, all that knowledge is right up here in your brain, you know, not in ours. And so you, Mr. French, Trinity, you guys are the perfect people to say, "You know, maybe it could have behooved maybe just one more slide saying, 'hey, what we're trying to do here'" in common, you know, terms. And I really think it would be helpful for the public, because these are big -- some of these big muscle movements that we vote on quickly because we've done the deep dive, but the average person goes, "What the hell did they just do?" And we need to minimize that a little bit. So you'll know the things that require that. So it's just more of a -- just a generic statement so that we can improve these meetings as we go forward, and we've been doing a lot to do that already. Thank you. MS. PATTERSON: Commissioners, if I may, just before you-all vote, we'll look at the calendar and look at the timing for getting a workshop, because there are several important things that are going to be coming up that tie directly to the AUIR and will be time for you-all to get visibility. As Commissioner Hall noted, one of those is level of service and looking at what the implications are, because there's a direct tie to funding sources, and so there's a method to some of this madness with the level of service, but we also have a major update to our impact fee program coming up as well, and that ties straight into the AUIR. January 28, 2025 Page 57 This is one of the most important things that you-all do but probably the most underrated as far as public involvement. And every time that we go out to speak to the public, we talk about the AUIR and encourage the public's involvement. We've not been successful since I don't think anybody but our staff is here today to talk about the AUIR. But it is -- it is how we figure out what we're going to do in the five years and the 10 years. So Trinity doesn't just wake up one day and decide to build a road. It's all of this that goes to that. So we're taking your comments seriously, and we'll find a time that we can get a workshop format so we can really dig into this and look at where those improvements might be able to be made and where -- frankly, where our hands are tied. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Thank you. Well, I would like to make a quick comment. I would definitely -- it would definitely benefit me, you know -- and I don't know the appetite of the rest of the Board -- but having a workshop moving forward every year leading up to this day like today, because, you know, we are all adults. We like visual learning. I'm not one who wants to sit down and read a thousand pages of something when I have staff that are already specialists or experts in the field that can bring it to our attention prior to today's date and when we're sitting here and actually taking a vote on it. So I definitely would strongly recommend moving forward from this day on and setting some sort of -- some process up that we have a workshop prior to -- like today. Just back to a couple of the slides. Mr. Bosi, you had -- you know, you were talking about the BEBR, which is the formula that UF uses and we adopt to make these calculations looking at the future. And Commissioner Hall touched on it. You know, I can almost guarantee that if you look at '19, '20, January 28, 2025 Page 58 and '21, that uptick was due to COVID epidemic. And the fact is that the rest of the country was pretty much closed down, and South Florida was open for business. And, you know, in the real estate business, and the -- it did. It was one of the busiest three years in the county's recent history for sales and transactions of properties. And that's because of what was going on outside of the state of Florida, and that's called motive. A lot of people, their motives to move -- this was -- in that period of time, we had more people move from California to Florida than ever before, which is unheard of, and it's because of what was going on in the nation around us. And don't let us forget the fact that we just -- devastation in southern California is happening right now. Thousands and thousands and thousands of people are displaced, destroyed -- their homes are destroyed. They may never build them again. So I don't want to just depend on UF not giving me factual reasons why things happen but just crunching numbers. I think we're going to see an uptick again starting real soon from the West coming this way again, because where else are you going to go? You're not going to move somewhere cold. You want to move somewhere warm. That's what they're used to. Southern Californians like the ocean, they like warm, and they have deep pockets. They will show up, and we're going to see it again. So we have to be conscious of that and be prepared for this. You know, even though one university might say we're in a downfall, but the reality is we're probably going to have another uptick here real soon. So just keep that in mind. So we have a motion. We have a second. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: One more comment. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Oh, I'm sorry, Commissioner McDaniel, I didn't see you pop up there. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: It's your first day. I'll keep January 28, 2025 Page 59 you on track. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: All right. Thank you. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I just -- and it has to do with what Commissioner Hall was talking about, and it was one of my early learning experiences when I came in. We had an issue where the level-of-service designation for parks was equal -- or was higher on regional parks than it was on community parks. And so it then allowed for money to be moved around and spent in regional parks, and then some of our community parks and maintenance and upkeep were upgraded. And we changed that level of service. So I think having that review, as has been suggested, that we have a workshop and have some discussions with regard to these level of services with regard to libraries and traffic and so on is extremely prudent. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: All right. I see nobody else lit up. We have a motion; we have a second. All in favor, signify by aye. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Aye. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Aye. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Aye. COMMISSIONER HALL: Aye. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Opposed, same sign, same sound. (No response.) CHAIRMAN KOWAL: The ayes have it. It passed. Item #15A PUBLIC COMMENTS ON GENERAL TOPICS NOT ON THE CURRENT OR FUTURE AGENDA BY INDIVIDUALS NOT ALREADY HEARD DURING PREVIOUS PUBLIC COMMENTS IN THIS MEETING MS. PATTERSON: Commissioners, that brings us all the way January 28, 2025 Page 60 to Item 15, staff and commission general communications. Item 15A is public comments on general topics not on the current or future agenda by individuals not already heard during previous comments in this meeting. MR. MILLER: We have none. Item #15C1 JUVENILE JUSTICE CIRCUIT 20 ADVISORY BOARD COUNTY REPRESENTATIVE – COMMISSIONER OR THEIR DESIGNEE (COMMISSIONER LOCASTRO’ S REQUEST) - MOTION TO APPOINT COMMISSIONER KOWAL BY COMMISSIONER MCDANIEL; SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOCASTRO - APPROVED 4/0 (COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS ABSENT) MS. PATTERSON: All right. That brings us to our add-on item. This is under staff communications. This is the add-on of the Juvenile Justice Circuit 20 Advisory Board County representative request. This is brought to the agenda by Commissioner LoCastro. If you can -- Troy, if you can give me the overhead. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: While you're doing that, can I -- CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Commissioner LoCastro, if you want to go ahead. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: I'll set the table here a little bit. Whether you-all know it or not, we all got e-mails from somebody who works with this advisory board looking for a commissioner to volunteer to sit on the advisory board, and although I have no doubt this advisory board has great value and they'd benefit from having a commissioner, the pushback I gave on the e-mail that I January 28, 2025 Page 61 replied to -- and I don't know if any of you, you know, replied to it all -- and I cc'ed Amy Patterson and Mr. Klatzkow -- is I said, "That's great saying you need a commissioner, but that's not how our process works." Mr. Klatzkow and his office does a formal job going through all of the advisory boards and different things that we sit on. We vote on it, we decide who would be the better pick. We get details on the requirements for this board and things. So it was great that they shot out an e-mail looking for a quick volunteer, but I just didn't think that was the way to do it, you know, first come, first serve, especially with very little info. It just said, you know, can you sit on the Board. So that's the only reason why I pulled it. And then between when I added it, I guess I should say, and now I had asked if somebody can dig up a little bit more information, and that's what -- it looks like it's here. And then we all have a chance to think about it, see if we think we're a fit, if we know how often the meetings are, does it fit into our schedules, and, you know, we decide who's the best commissioner to fit, not just sort of first come, first serve off of a two-line e-mail. So that's why I put it on there. I don't know if you recall getting that e-mail. It was a very basic, you know, generic, you know, "Will you serve, yes or no?" and that's it, and that's not how we do it. So, Ms. Patterson, do you want to take it from here? MS. PATTERSON: Yes, sir. So the County Attorney did help me and found the statute as well as how this new advisory board would work. It does allow for a county commissioner or their designee. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: So it is new. It's not that we've been missing all these meetings -- MS. PATTERSON: No. January 28, 2025 Page 62 COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: -- all of a sudden they're, like, where the heck's the commissioner? MS. PATTERSON: It's new. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Okay. MS. PATTERSON: So at this point in time, I think the conversation for the Board is, if there's a Board member that's interested in sitting on this, then that's fine, or if you want to designate somebody. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Commissioner Saunders. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: It's always the guy that's not here. MS. PATTERSON: He'll appreciate that. Or if you want to -- if you want to have a designee, and so that's kind of the first order of business. If a commissioner is interested in taking the seat -- now, I don't have information on how frequently they're going to meet or where. I'm not sure if the County Attorney knows. MR. KLATZKOW: I went to their website. It looks like they meet three or four times a year. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: A year? COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: What do you-all think? Does this require a commissioner? And not that we're trying to downgrade it and just send a person. You know, sometimes it's -- you can make an argument either way that we send a commissioner to the first meeting -- and I know I've gone to meetings where I've left and said, "It was at the wrong level. It was more of a county staff," and then we made the -- and they didn't disagree. But I wanted to just have some open discussion here. I mean, you know, we all serve -- we all serve on different boards now, so it's a matter of, "Hey, do you just want to say yes to this and see what it's like, or do we want a designee?" Do we think this is at the level -- and also, too, the right person, not just somebody to go to the meeting and, you know, this is something that's very specific, so -- January 28, 2025 Page 63 CHAIRMAN KOWAL: I have a question for the County Attorney. If -- let's say if one of us did sit on it, does that -- does that set a precedence moving on to a commissioner always hold that, or we can always back off and have a designee do it? Like, let's say if I volunteered to do it because I'm kind of in the justice background and stuff like that, and did it over this next year one, the one or two or three meetings left, would that set a precedence then the next would have to be a County Commissioner, or would it -- we can actually designate somebody else we feel that might have interest in doing it or have the ability to do it? MR. KLATZKOW: You can always designate somebody. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Okay. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Because you can report back to us and say, "Hey, I went to three meetings. I gave them the benefit of my expertise." CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Yeah. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: "And now I -- you know, I talked with Ms. Patterson, and we're going to -- we're going to send a designee." I sort of am almost about to do that on a board that I sit on because, like you said, I went to three or four meetings, digested it well, and then, you know, am about to give some feedback to county staff saying a staff member actually might be more effective because of what this different board requires. But I mean, I think even if you went to the meeting, you know, Commissioner Kowal, and then reported back to us and said -- you know, I don't think you have to go for a year unless you go, "Wow, they really need a commissioner to" -- because I don't know who the other board members are. None of us do. MS. PATTERSON: I have a list. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Oh, you do. Okay. January 28, 2025 Page 64 MS. PATTERSON: If you'd like to see this, it's two pages. But I'll put the first page up, and then we can flip. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I nominate Commissioner Kowal. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Yeah. Yeah. So there's a lot of designees in there, so we don't really know if it's, you know, Sheriff Rambosk or somebody from his staff. But, yeah, I expected to see sort of a list like this where it was, like, state attorney or his or her designee. I doubt the state attorney's sitting on it, but maybe. It's possible. MS. PATTERSON: And most of the positions do have the person or their designee. So it's -- it will be interesting to see how that -- and if you'd like, I'll put the second page up, and you can see it. It's a wide range of people. Even community members. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: I just think Commissioner Kowal, with his law enforcement background -- and I'd be happy to sit on this board if you came back and said, "Hey, I digested everything. It doesn't really fit into my schedule" -- but I think you having -- you know, going to the first meeting and giving us your, you know, educated digestion of what they're doing, who they need, and either come back and say, "Hey, guys, it really needs to be me" or here's the feedback, I think that would be really valuable to all of us. I don't know when the next meeting is, but -- CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Instead of belaboring it any longer, then I'll step up. I'll volunteer, and I'll see if it does warrant a commissioner being there or not. And who knows? You know, juvenile is the -- they are our future, you know. So maybe we need to have some, you know, good eyes on what they're doing or what they're not doing over there in the organization with the probation and the other things they do. So with that being said, I don't know if we have to nominate. January 28, 2025 Page 65 MR. KLATZKOW: Pleasure of the Board. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Pleasure of the Board. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: So I already moved to put you on. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Second. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: I've got a motion and a second. All in favor of appointing me to the board to do an -- explore a mental health -- COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Exploratory. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Exploratory dive into it -- assessment -- so signify by saying aye, in favor. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Aye. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Aye. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Aye. COMMISSIONER HALL: Aye. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Opposed, same sign, same sound. (No response.) COMMISSIONER HALL: You the man. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: All right. I'm the man. The ayes have it. Give me three more days to work. Item #15C2 CHRISTOPHER MASON – MEETING W/ARMY CORP FOR THE COASTAL STORM WATER ADVISORY COMMITTEE; WILL BE PAUSING WORK DUE TO LACK OF FUNDING; ADVISORY COMMITTEE NOT TO FILL THE VACANT SEATS UNTIL FUNDING IS AVAILABLE; BOARD TO PROVIDE LETTERS TO THE ARMY CORP FOR CONTINUED PARTNERSHIP AND TO REQUEST AN INTERIM REPORT January 28, 2025 Page 66 MS. PATTERSON: Commissioners, next up is staff communications. We do have Mr. Mason here to give a brief update on what is going on with our coastal resilience efforts by the Army Corps. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Good morning, Chris. MR. MASON: Good morning, Commissioners. Christopher Mason, for the record, your director of Community Planning and Resiliency. About -- so to give you a little background, I've been staff liaison to this initiative since April of 2023. We have weekly meetings with the Army Corps, and there's also monthly meetings for the public and the Army Corps and staff to attend. Earlier this month we were informed in one of our weekly meetings that there was a pause coming to this study. And so the pause -- what has initiated the pause or precipitated that pause is a lack of funding. So essentially, the Army Corps folks at this point have -- they're on dwindling funds and would not be able to make certain milestones that were associated with this project. And those -- there were two milestones. One called a tentatively selected plan and then the second milestone was the draft Environmental Impact Statement, which is the overall large report that comes out with all the modeling results and all the data that has been put into the study. So we, like I said, have been informed that there was a pause. Last week there was a public meeting in which the Corps informed the public at large as well. So this pause is looking at six to 12 months, but we believe, potentially, it may run anywhere -- anywhere up to 18 months. But we would be at a pause to restart this study looking, you know, somewhere between 12 and 18 months from now. So there has not been an official statement or document released January 28, 2025 Page 67 to the Board, obviously. I would assume something will come in writing, but we do have, you know, e-mail evidence of back-and-forth of this pause. But I would assume something would probably be issued to the Board stating such, not just in e-mail form. So I wanted to update you on that today. We do also have a matter of our advisory committee that oversees this for your service. So staff would take any type of direction or guidance on where you would like to -- where the Board would like to go with that committee as far as the pause goes. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: All right. I know we had discussion yesterday, and I told you that, you know, I feel we'll have this discussion with the rest of the Board members on what direction they want to go with the committee that represents us, because there's going to be a long period that we're probably going to be idle. We're not going to have anything going on eight -- 18 months possibly, from what I understand. MR. MASON: Potentially. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Potentially. So I know they had asked questions like, "What do we do? Do we fill our two remaining spots? Do we just sit here in limbo, or" -- but I think -- what I pose to my fellow commissioners is that we either just send them a letter saying they're just going to be frozen in time for now as the way they are, and then we'll reevaluate it a few months out if we foresee down the road that -- some light at the end of the tunnel that this is going to start back up, because, you know, with the conversation we had that sometimes people move, they move out of district, so they might not be able to represent, you know, 18 months later. We don't know what -- the nature of what's going on. So I recommend -- but it's totally going to be up to the Board what they feel that -- you know, we send a letter to the chairman of that board and just advise them that they're going to kind of be in a January 28, 2025 Page 68 frozen state, in limbo the way they are, not fill those two remaining positions until we get to a closer time and period that we know that we're going to actually have something to send them to, so -- and then we'll reevaluate. If we have to elect different people or appoint different people to different positions, we'll do that at that time. But I've got Commissioner LoCastro lit up. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Okay. Thank you, Chairman. So we spoke yesterday as well, just -- here's some of my comments, and some of these are just representative from what we talked about yesterday. The Army Corps provides a valuable service, and even if we get a final report that has some crazy things in it that we're not going to do, they don't direct us to do anything. Also, we can't influence their funding, obviously. So when they come to us and say, "We have a significant funding issue," then we just have to, you know, accept it. But I think, you know, it's all in the wording. So if they've got -- if they've gotten to the point they are now and they've actually done an awful lot, I don't look at it as a freeze, but we're taking it -- they're telling us they're taking a pause. And I've worked with the Army Corps a lot in my previous military life, and I have never had a freeze happen. But I think when they come back, they don't -- you know, I use the word "restart," and maybe that's just semantics. You're talking -- I don't believe they restart. I think they pick up where they left off. So we don't want to lose the value of what they've done. The only thing that I would say in whatever letter that gets drafted from the county that says -- and it should be something that we reiterate that we know that everything they're telling us isn't anything we have control over. So we understand what you're telling us. We value what you've done up to this one point. We January 28, 2025 Page 69 will stand by and wait until, you know, you get additional funding to then pick up where you left off. I don't know if we can be -- you know, this is really a question for John Mullins, but if we can be -- and not to come up to the podium, but just if we can be influential in letting the Army Corps' financial leadership know that what we do here is a priority. I know the leadership of the City of Naples just sent several letters to the Army Corps, who they're working with to fix the pier, and they basically said, "Hey, we know that you're in limbo right now on the funding and helping us and things like that," but all the letters said, if you -- "Here's why we hope you're making us a priority because the Naples Pier is a landmark, and it controls tourism and things like that." So something proactive. We don't want to scare them off. And in the last paragraph -- this is just a suggestion, because I've done it before -- ask them for an interim report that gives a summary of what they've done up to this point so maybe we can see a little something. Maybe it won't be all inclusive, and they'll hold some stuff close to their chest because there's a few things that they haven't finished, but something that at least gives us an interim report where we can pause, and we have something on the shelf so that when they come back to us in six, 12, or 18 months, we're both pulling something off the shelf and picking up where we left off. That would just be some thoughts just based on, you know, the dealing that I've had with the Army Corps. But I would say, you know, they're in great demand by a lot of places, and the fact that we've had them here this long and they've spent so many funds, even though, you know, there were some that were saying, "Kick them to the curb," or "We don't need them," or anything. They're just giving us their suggestions and their advice, and it is valuable info. And the key thing we've talked about in this January 28, 2025 Page 70 meeting before is, if we don't get their final report, it makes it impossible to chase grant money in certain areas, because having worked with the Army Corps or the county all the way to the finish line gives us real strength then to go to the next step. And so that's why I'm saying even the interim report could get us a little more prepared and sort of caught up a bit if they agreed to that. They may or may not, so it's just a thought. But, you know, those are my thoughts. And I know they've done a lot of work to this time. I don't think we want to send them a letter that gives the impression, "Thanks, you know, we know you're frozen. See you when we see you." You know, something more of "We want to continue to be a team partner. We understand funding drives everything." We don't have the leverage to provide additional funding to them, but we hope that they're continuing to make us a priority to finish what they started before they maybe move on to other places where they haven't even done anything. So those are just some thoughts that I had that we didn't get to talk about yesterday. MR. MASON: Thank you. Duly noted. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: It sounds like we're going to have two letters, because the only one I was referring to, Commissioner, was just to our civilian board, just to give them an idea of where they're at. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Right. That, hey, they're on a pause. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: You're on pause, not so much the Corps, the letter. But that was what I was referring to when I made the mention of a letter. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: I think a letter to the Corps would be something to consider. I think they'd -- they would appreciate the professionalism of it. January 28, 2025 Page 71 MR. MASON: Understood. Thank you, sir. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Commissioner McDaniel. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yes. And then -- and a letter to the Corps is a good idea, I mean, because they've been here for eight years. I mean, you remember the adventure we had when they were here the first time, and then we established -- and this is -- what this subject matter's about is us managing the committee that this board has appointed. And I concur wholeheartedly with Commissioner Kowal, don't appoint two new members. One of the things that the County Attorney's Office has done has continued to accept applications for membership onto basically all of our advisory committees. So whatever we do, freeze the committee, set it, put it in its current -- leave it in its current status, and then if, in fact, the Corps comes back with additional information and an interim report, as you suggested, Commissioner LoCastro, then we can go back and touch the individual five members, make sure they're still interested in serving, and then go to the alternates and do that thing. We just don't want to extinguish the committee in case funding becomes available and we get something that we need to -- I want to make sure that there is a community liaison with the Corps and the public and then communicating back with our board. So I think your suggestion is perfect with regard to that, and a second letter to the Corps for that interim report, if they have one. They're probably not going to have one, but it doesn't hurt to ask. MR. MASON: Certainly. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: So you have your marching orders. MR. MASON: I do, sir. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: All right. I think that's a good idea, Commissioner LoCastro, to, you know, at least let them know that, you know, we acknowledge the work they've done, you know, and be January 28, 2025 Page 72 good partners in this. And if they want to -- more than willing to show us what they've already done, then that would be even greater for us, too, because then we can start looking at it, see if it's even things we can do or can't do or even have an appetite to do. So we'll get ahead of it. MR. MASON: I'll speak with the -- I'll speak with the project lead from the team for the Corps and see where we can go with this. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Thank you, Chris. MR. MASON: Thank you. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: We don't have to vote anything on this? No. Okay. Thank you. MR. MASON: Thank you. MS. PATTERSON: One last update under staff communications is regarding the Naples Pier. I just wanted to give the Board some visibility. We've been having conversations and meetings with the City of Naples regarding the pier rebuild, and they're looking for some assistance from the county on a launch and staging site, particularly relative to the large pilings that will have to be installed to rebuild the pier. So before this conversation gets any further and we're out talking to the public, one of the sites that they're considering is Bayview Park. So obviously, that's going to generate some community interest and concerns as that conversation evolves. The city is gathering some more information before we start talking more to the CRA and to the community about time frames and how long they would need to utilize it, what does that look like. Lay-down areas, particularly if we can find someplace where they may be able to stage, staging of parking of employees and things like that. So more to come on this, but we didn't want to get out to the public and start having these conversations without first giving this board visibility on that matter. It's obviously a very important January 28, 2025 Page 73 project not only to the City of Naples, but to Collier County. It's a landmark of our community, and we want to do what we can. The City of Naples is also going to look at the use. Maybe we can share the use of their launch site for some of this work as well, and some of the work will be able to be done by access to the pier by landside. But there are certain things that are going to be required to be done by barge. So with that, if you have any questions regarding the pier; if not, I am -- I have no more updates. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Commissioner Hall. COMMISSIONER HALL: Well, it's my understanding that the rock-crushing site is clear. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Here we go. Full circle. That's funny. But I did -- I did express my concerns that I don't want this to turn into, you know, the park down there being a lay-down site, a parking facility for workers that are -- they're traversing back and forth on these barges. That I feel like, once again -- and I hate to say it, but Del's is a piece of property that already has a parking lot, has a large area of grassy area that -- if we do need to stage things in cooperation with this. And the pier is just as important to the county as it is to the city. I wish we had more control over it to get the job done, but we really don't other than some help. And we've already provided some financial help through our tourism board. I think up to a $2.9 million grant to get them moving in the right direction. You know, it is a tourism driver, and, you know, our citizens use it just as much as anybody else. So I'd like to be a good partner in it. I'd like to have the ability to do more, but we don't because it's in their jurisdiction. But if that's something we do -- but I don't want our park to look like a construction site. I don't want -- you know, I want minimal January 28, 2025 Page 74 amount of impact on it. So if we can have a designated area to stage things and their workers and their vehicles in and out type deal, so -- MS. PATTERSON: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Moving forward. Thank you. MS. PATTERSON: That's all I have. County Attorney. MR. KLATZKOW: Nothing, thank you. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: All right. Commissioners. Commissioner Hall, do you have anything? COMMISSIONER HALL: I'm good to go. Thank you. Good job today. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: It's not over. Commissioner LoCastro. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Yes. I wanted to just use this time to clarify a couple of things that have been in the headlines in my district that are significant, and I want to, you know, separate rumor from fact just briefly. But recently there's been some -- what I call sensational headlines on two topics to basically, you know, incite a reaction from citizens, and often these headlines are improper or filled with misinformation. And I shot out a note yesterday to several of those journalists and people who were doing that on social media, and the two topics are Hideaway Beach/Tigertail and Costco. So there's a lot of -- and the reason why I'm talking about this now -- it has nothing to do with anybody in this room, but maybe there's somebody on Zoom who is going to write another article to try to, you know, pump up the masses with incorrect information. And I'm using my newsletter. I responded to every citizen e-mail. I've been all over social media. But, you know, I want to do the max to correct the record so citizens know what's happening and what's not. So when you see headlines that say, "Tigertail Beach under January 28, 2025 Page 75 massive reconstruction again. County wasting tons of money. What do you think?" The fact is, there's nothing happening out at Tigertail that the county is doing. All the work's happening north of Tigertail off of the coast of Hideaway Beach, and it's paid for primarily by the Hideaway Beach tax district, which is money that their residents put into a kitty and pay for on their own. Now, they -- that tax district did come to us. I think late last year or maybe early this year they came to the TDC to ask for a small amount of money to augment their multi -- or their multi-million-dollar investment on their own to complete a couple of small components to basically do the job right because costs had increased. Why did we say yes to that at the TDC? Because everything that Hideaway Beach is doing on their own and they've gotten the permits, they've gotten the permission, whether we hate it or not, this is their project. But the things that they've done to move some sand around and make some repairs due to recent hurricanes and storms, Tigertail Lagoon gets a positive residual effect, because anything they can do to flow water in front of Hideaway Beach better -- water flows downhill, and the downhill is Tigertail Lagoon. So the work's being done at Hideaway. It's not being paid for by the county, but we're getting some positive residual effects in Tigertail Lagoon, which has been a mud puddle for many years because the water hasn't been flowing and because sand has moved around. But the other separating rumor from fact is, you know, a lot of -- a lot of stones and spears have been thrown by journalists who are uninformed and citizens who say, "Oh, my God, every year they're doing something out on Tigertail," and it's really Hideaway Beach and Sand Dollar Island, and how stupid that what they did last year, it all got deteriorated and whatnot. Is Andrew Miller here, or did he leave? So Andrew Miller is in January 28, 2025 Page 76 charge of Coastal Zone Management for Collier County and does a great job. One of the things I said to the journalist is, "Andrew and his team are doing something on every beach every day all year round whether we've had a hurricane or just a king tide. So we're always adding sand. We're always restoring the beaches." It's not that it happened -- we do it every 10 years when a Katrina or an Irma or an Ian hits. Even sometimes when we just have really bad rainstorms and high tides and a lot of erosion, they're out there around the clock keeping our beaches looking the way that they do. So it's really irresponsible to say, "Oh, all this money is being wasted at Tigertail, the county taxpayer dollars," where it's not. It's at Hideaway, and it's their residents who are paying for it, and they're doing what's going to probably happen every year, which is regular maintenance every time sand moves. Now, some people have chimed in and said, "Stupid county, why don't they put, you know, rocks out there or seawall or this or that?" And trust me, we're not sitting on our hands and we're not stupid and neither is Hideaway. Turtles have a hard time climbing rocks to lay eggs. All kinds of other things are negative effects by environmental agencies that Hideaway Beach is working with to get their permits approved. So a lot of great ideas by people that know nothing about what Hideaway Beach residents have worked so hard to do to their community that they feel is right. Whether we do or not is immaterial because the county isn't part of it. But we have seen the residual positive effects of what they've done, so I wanted to mention that. The second thing is Costco. So when I see headlines that say, "Costco aggressively moving forward and making progress" -- and that's, of course, to incite the people who don't want a Costco in East January 28, 2025 Page 77 Naples to go, "My God, stupid county. Don't they realize the traffic and this and that and all that?" And the reality is -- and I'm going to -- I'm going to read the latest, hot off the presses, from our county staff. And I blasted it out in e-mails yesterday. First, Costco hasn't even purchased the property, okay. That's number one. Number two, they have to submit a site development plan to the county staff that gets accepted. They did submit one, and it was turned back, basically, to use citizen terms, "disapproved" with lots of issues and whatnot, so it wasn't something that's allowing them to move forward. So that's not true. So, you know, like Commissioner Saunders says, words matter. So when the headline makes it sound like they're aggressively in overdrive -- I mean, I got e-mails from citizens that said, "Wow, Commissioner, let me get you up to date, because obviously you're disconnected on what's going on with Costco" -- and I think I mentioned this here before. A cashier at the current Costco off Pine Ridge said that everything's approved, they're putting shovels in the ground, and it will be open next spring. Wow, a whole bunch of people from Costco are going to jail because they have no permits, haven't bought the property, haven't brought us a Site Development Plan. And if any of us get questions on how you feel about Costco, my answer always is, "I don't know because I don't know what they're asking for." Yeah, I know what a Costco looks like, but the Site Development Plan is much more detailed, and it talks about all kinds of specifics that really give you an educated view on, "Hey, does this thing really fit?" And even some of the articles -- some of the misinformation about, "Wow, don't they know it will increase traffic," and this and that, all those -- the traffic analysis and fire and all those things we look at for safety, those all come afterwards when we get a Site Development Plan where we say, "Wow, this thing looks possible," January 28, 2025 Page 78 and we haven't gotten that. So I don't know. None of us up here know what the traffic numbers are. We need the experts to analyze it. And it might kill the project if it's over and above what the roads can fit, or it might help it move forward. But right now Costco is in the exploratory phase. They're talking with our county staff. Developers do that all the time, and unbeknownst to citizens a lot of projects die on the vine. Let me just read you -- to conclude here so hopefully journalists that might being Zooming in -- and Mr. Jamie French is the person you want to talk to because he owns the department that has all of the components. So rather than quote a commissioner and take all my words out of context and make me sound like, you know, I'm uneducated and, you know -- the second e-mail I got is, "You should join our bridge club, Commissioner, because everyone at my bridge club knows everything about Costco and when they're cutting the ribbon." And I said, "Wow, that's some bridge club. I haven't seen them in any of the discussions. Neither have I seen the cashiers." But here's what I got from our staff just, you know, minutes ago. Costco has submitted documents to the current Site Development Plan, but it was marked as an incomplete submittal, okay. The property is still listed under the ownership of Hacienda Lakes. It has not been purchased. So you can't build anything or put shovels in the ground or cut a ribbon if you don't own the property, or you go to jail. They were required to apply for a fueling facility -- basically a gas station -- distance waiver that will go to an advertised public hearing with the Hearing Examiner. The application and review process has not been completed yet. The meeting will be scheduled and advertised afterwards. January 28, 2025 Page 79 They have informed us that they are planning on a neighborhood information meeting on 2/18, February 18th. Those of you out there that say, "Oh, my God, an information meeting, that's the final step," it's not. A NIM is so citizens can give their praise, their negativity, their concerns. They will also hear from the Costco folks as to what -- their request or what they're looking at. And a lot of times the NIM does several things. It makes the developer totally change their project because they got so much valuable info from the community. It also can have them continue to move forward and then finally give us a Site Development Plan that has a much more educated design because of the neighborhood information meeting, or at the NIM they could decide, "Wow, the juice isn't worth the squeeze. We'll look somewhere else." A lot of projects have died on the vine from NIMs that gave the developer negative pushback that either slowed, stalled, or ended the project. So the NIM isn't just a -- or it just isn't a ceremonial step before shovels go in the ground. But it says here, "So a NIM on February 18th for only the architectural deviations they are seeking that is not currently supported by the PUD. The land use is already commercial." So I've gotten so many e-mails that say, "Please don't rezone this property so that Costco can build." A rezoning will never come to this commission because that property is already zoned commercial. And several, quote, journalists that have written articles with such specificity need to understand that. The use they are seeking is allowed. This is a -- is a PUD or an insubstantial change to the PUD. This will go to the Hearing Examiner as a public meeting as well. And like I say, that just concerns the fuel stations. Many other things we haven't even gotten. They're just trying to get a feel of is January 28, 2025 Page 80 the fuel -- are the fuel stations a deal breaker or not? Are they in the wrong spot under county code? Are they too close to other gas stations? And then finally it says, "No building permits have been submitted." So not that no building permits haven't been approved, haven't been submitted. So it really does get my goat when, you know, I had a three-hour town hall meeting at Henderson Creek, I had another one in Goodland earlier this week. Mr. French and his team came with me. I've got some other ones scheduled. And my biggest challenge right now is to debunk all of these sensational articles trying to pump people up about the wasted tax dollars at Tigertail and, you know, Costco's on its way tomorrow because a cashier and a bridge club have confirmed it. And I wanted to just go on the record at this meeting to whoever might be listening that we're watching this very closely. I don't prematurely -- no commissioner up here prematurely gives their stance on anything until we have all of the details and the facts. So saying, you know, "Will you vote for Costco or not?" I don't know. I don't know what's coming to us. Nothing may come to us. They may go to this NIM and drop everything. They may go to this NIM and realize they have to go back to the drawing board, and since it's already zoned commercial, it won't need to be rezoned if, in fact, they meet the requirements, the stringent requirements of the county. So if there's one journalist listening to this right now that's about to write another incorrect article on all the stupid things we're doing in Tigertail and how Costco is opening, you know, soon, it's very premature, and you really need to do your homework to help inform our citizens and not just write sensational articles that create hundreds of misinformed e-mails to us and sell a lot of newspapers or maybe January 28, 2025 Page 81 get you a lot of likes or a lot of hate emojis on social media off of total misinformation. So I'm available also to talk to anyone. I'm not throwing this on Mr. French. But the journalists out there that are looking for the specifics of the county's position, hopefully I've set the record straight. And I will put this exact information in a newsletter that we'll release this week, and I also sent out -- and Mr. French and his whole team were on an e-mail that I sent out last night to two very specific media people who are playing games with Costco and also our -- or maybe they're just writing articles faster than they're doing the homework about what's going on at Hideaway Beach and not Tigertail. And, lastly, I'll say more misinformation -- there's three things out in the Hideaway/Tigertail area that keep being confused. You have Hideaway Beach and Sand Dollar Island. That's basically off of the Hideaway Beach community. Then you have Tigertail Lagoon. So when you pull into the park and you park your car, the first thing you see is a lagoon, and then on the other side of the mangroves is Hideaway Beach. So many journalists and citizens keep saying Hideaway Beach when they really mean lagoon. Hideaway Lagoon when they really mean Hideaway -- or Tigertail Lagoon when they really mean Hideaway Beach. And, you know, I'm all for writing long articles in my newsletter that goes to 80,000 subscribers, and I appreciate news media that are helping to get the word out. But what I don't appreciate are sensational headlines just to get readership that they've -- I asked the county staff, "Have you been contacted by this reporter?" "No." So, you know, if you're getting all your information off Facebook and Nextdoor, you might not have the details about two big major things in my district that may or may not come, i.e., Costco, or January 28, 2025 Page 82 what's really happening on Hideaway Beach and on Marco Island. So I wanted to take this time. And I appreciate the chance to expand on that on the record for whoever might be watching. Thank you. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Okay. Thank you. Commissioner McDaniel. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yeah. Well, first of all, I want to just publicly announce Jamie French's personal cell phone. They can just call him and not you. And then number two, you know, the less attention we pay to the media, the better off all of us are, in fact, going to be. So I do have two things that I wish to bring up, if you'll indulge me -- and you're slouching. Do you need a minute? CHAIRMAN KOWAL: I was going to tell her she's going to get a long break here in a few minutes. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yeah. We're going to give her a long break, and I'll try to be brief. Two things: I'd like Iandimarino and Jamie French to come up. We -- and I just want to have a brief discussion today and see if there's consensus to have a hearing at some time in the near future with regard to our code enforcement. We have long gone on the premise of reactionary code enforcement. They don't move unless somebody files a complaint. Well, they do move. Don't take this literally. You understand that, Thomas. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: We can give Tom's cell phone, too. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Oh, yeah. Make sure you put yours up -- put his up on the screen, whoever's running the video. But it has been the habit of our community to have a reactionary code enforcement, and I -- and a balance needs to be sought. We're not the Wild Wild West. People are coming in here from California, January 28, 2025 Page 83 from the other coast, and they move to Golden Gate Estates, and they're in the woods, and then they can do whatever they want, and you can't. And so my question is, if the Board is in the mood to have a discussion with regard to how we can happily ramp up our code, because I'm not all about more government by any stretch of the imagination. And I know -- and a clarification in an actual hearing with regard to the laws, what our code enforcement officers can and cannot do, access visibility, that sort of thing. And then -- and then have a discussion with these folks who are in charge of all this as to how we can reach a happy balance, if you will. Because I remember early on the County Attorney sharing, "Well, our code enforcement is only -- has always been only reactionary," and it can't be that way anymore. There has to be some effort put in from our side to assist folks to come into compliance. Jamie? MR. FRENCH: I'm not quite certain if I want to speak, sir. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: No. Did you -- and you have to say your phone number first. MR. FRENCH: No, I'm not doing that. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Okay. MR. FRENCH: You wouldn't get me anyway, as most of you know. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: 239 -- COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Are you okay with the -- without belaboring the point -- we don't necessarily need to do it today. Basically, are you okay with us bringing -- with me bringing an agenda item forward and going through this? MR. FRENCH: Yes, sir. And, again, for the record, my name's Jamie French. I'm your department head for -- COMMISSIONER HALL: Everything. January 28, 2025 Page 84 MR. FRENCH: -- Growth Management and Community Development. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Everything. MR. FRENCH: A growing group, we'll call them. Nonetheless, sir, you as a Board have recognized some of the consolidation, and through your ResourceX efforts that we've -- that we've really focused on code enforcement as a -- looking at it countywide, as all of our code efforts, to be more of that force multiplier. Now, clearly, we are not -- in any way, shape, or form do we want to intimidate the public nor do we want to remove the quiet enjoyment of their investment or their property, much less remove the highest and best use that they seek for their property. We value that as well. And, currently, we run somewhere between 97 and 98 percent of voluntary compliance based on the complaints we receive. Now, as you mentioned, Commissioner, Chapter 162 of the Florida Statute does require -- throughout the state of Florida, they've preempted local government to say that unless it is a life-safety concern, it -- we have to have a complainant, a validated complainant. And that does put the public at risk at times because what we do see is some retaliatory efforts that occur to someone who had a complaint called on them, then they turn around and they call on their neighbors, their neighbor's friends, or on the community. And we balance that very closely, the best to our ability. But we would certainly love the opportunity to talk to you about some of the programs we've got, what you've seen probably in your budget in the last two years, and your last two fiscal years, with regards to how you as a Board -- and even most recently on a foreclosure of a home that was worth over $600,000, we collected January 28, 2025 Page 85 our 200 and -- or quarter of a million dollars in back fines and liens, and the property has been cleaned up down on Goodland. And I know we've met with Commissioner LoCastro, some of his constituents, and received nothing but, you know, praise, and that's hard to do in some of these communities. Nonetheless, we'd love to have the opportunity to come back, talk to you about it, and maybe seek some of your guidance and perhaps, you know, work more closely with the County Attorney's -- not that we don't have a great relationship with Jeff's office, but maybe to get some clarification from this board on what you'd like us to see, what maybe the considerations of life safety should be with regards to those things that would require a permit, whether by state or by local. And we know -- we know especially, you know, not -- and Commissioner Kowal was dead on accurate as far as the California numbers in 2021 and 2022. We recognize that the demographic of our community has -- is continuing to change rapidly. And through -- we also use that same regression modeling within my group that Mike uses as we contemplate future growth, but it creates future consideration for code efforts and other services that the county brings forward. So love to have a conversation with you. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Great. And are you all okay with doing that? That was my primary reason for bringing it up. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Yeah. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Did you have a comment to him on the code enforcement before I go to my next -- COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: I did. And it's more of an update for all of you. So Tom and Jamie and a few others came with me to a town hall recently, as I said. I usually just do those town halls solo, but when I January 28, 2025 Page 86 know that citizens have been reading all the media and Nextdoor and we're trying to separate rumor from fact, it really does help when senior leadership from the county comes. And you have such credibility. I mean, look at that town hall, right, Tom? When we left after three hours, you won't believe -- well, you would believe the thanks e-mails I got from people that said, "Wow, thank you for really correcting the record." But the one thing I wanted to tell the other commissioners, if you remember, it was last year or maybe even longer than that, I had presented a stronger ordinance or directive, I should say -- I don't believe it was an ordinance. It was a directive to our Code Enforcement Board that our expectation was when people have fines, that they don't come to the podium and say, "Well, you know, I did the best I could," and instead of owing us 300,000, that the Code Enforcement Board, they were sort of turning into Santa Claus where these fines were all going from 300,000 to zero or, you know, there was no in between. And some of the reasons some of these people gave were pretty thin. So we all said unanimously that we wanted direction to go to the Code Enforcement Board, that we would like them to hold people accountable in full because that's not county money that's coming to us in fines, it's taxpayer money that then we utilize for lots of other things. So every time the Code Enforcement Board says, zero, zero, zero, zero, that's money that's being thrown out the door, and then sometimes we have a one-hour meeting here where we're trying to find $50,000 to do something good. And I think I presented the statistic that said, over the last few years, we had, like, 5 million in codes or in fines, and we had only gotten, like, a few hundred thousand dollars. It was something like that. But what I want to tell the commissioners is that our unanimous January 28, 2025 Page 87 direction to the Code Enforcement Board has been heard. The person that I appointed on the Code Enforcement replies back to me to just give them feedback, and he says, "Wow, we are operating much differently." You know, just because you had a hangnail and couldn't cut your grass, and it's 20 feet tall or, you know, you've got the old sick grandmother -- we're very sincere to a realistic reply. But, you know, some people, their reply is, "Well, that was the previous owner. I bought the lot at a huge discount, but I don't think I should have to pay the fine." Just as we learned in Goodland due to Mr. Klatzkow's great work, when we put a lien on that house, that $300,000 fine was paid in full. So I just wanted to say thank you, you know, very much, and that the Code Enforcement Board is operating differently based on our guidance, and actually, it was the county staff at one of the last couple of meetings reiterated to them -- because I was getting reports they were maybe sliding back to old ways and, you know, that has been corrected. So that's part of what we're talking about here, because it's real money, and it's real things, and we want Code Enforcement to have, you know, teeth but also, you know, to be cognizant of what people do have, you know -- you know, very specific, you know, issues that maybe have us readdress the fine, but it's not our default. So anyway, thank you. And I appreciate, you know, all the great words you said at the town hall that really educated that group of citizens who turned out. Thank you. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Thank you, Jamie. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Thank you. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: My other point. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Go ahead. Sorry. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: And I'm sorry. Again, I January 28, 2025 Page 88 wanted to be brief. I would like to know -- we already know that -- COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: She's tough. She's good. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: So my other point is -- and it has to do with fire. I would like to have a discussion. Dr. George doesn't need to come to the podium today, but I have a -- I have a map here of our county with our raw water lines and our potable -- potable water lines throughout the community. We're expanding this map. And I'd like to have a discussion -- and I don't even know if Amy knows about this yet. And certainly under the direction of the County Manager and through Dr. George's office -- about a countywide fire protection service, if you will. We have municipal lines that run all through Golden Gate Estates. Particularly right down Golden Gate Boulevard, there are raw water lines for another municipality who have a policy that don't allow for interconnection to assist us with fire suppression. And so -- you telling me to hurry up? Really? CHAIRMAN KOWAL: This is fun up here. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: It is, I mean -- CHAIRMAN KOWAL: I have something to say today, too, so I feel bad. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Do you really? CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Yeah. We'll get to it. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: That's what this meeting's for, so we can -- COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Exactly. The long and the short of it is is I would like to develop this -- you know, we have to bring everything up to the Board, get consensus, positive head nods. I'll work through this process and bring back another item. And what I'd like to do is establish a countywide fire protection January 28, 2025 Page 89 curriculum, for lack of a better term. We've already got MOUs with municipalities and fire departments and so on, but -- and the initiation of this is -- and, again, we walk in faith, not fear. But the travesty that's going on right now in California. We've already had our own travesty, and we squeezed through that seven, eight years ago -- seven years ago. I don't want to squeeze through another one. There's no reason for us to not have every available public asset available to protect our community. There's no reason whatsoever. And so that's the impetus of this. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Can I just ask you a question? COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Sure. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: I know that Ms. Patterson's been doing a lot of work working with our fire chiefs and the fire commissioners to get an assessment of our fire stations. Even though this is a little different, it's not. It falls under the umbrella of, wow, we want, like you said, an overall assessment. Maybe at that meeting -- and if you think it's inappropriate, you know, you're making the proposal. But as a side briefing, just giving us an update since we're all together, and the topic is fire, where we are, where we're not, what stations we're looking at for possible expansion, rebuild, new stations. You know, that might be a great meeting to do that, you know, under that topic. MS. PATTERSON: Yes, sir. I actually have a meeting this week with another one of the fire districts, so I'll be able to give you an update. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Okay. Cool. Now I am done. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: You're done. You weren't lit up. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I might, though. January 28, 2025 Page 90 CHAIRMAN KOWAL: You gave me the head nod. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: It depends on what you have to say. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: All right. Well, I do have a few things I just want to touch on. It actually came out of the public safety meeting last Friday. You know, I chaired it again this year. Third year in a row. Typically I don't have a whole lot come out of there. Most of the times things are handled in-house between mental health, the courts, things of that nature. But this is something that I think's going to fall back on us and we might want to get ahead of. And in light of the regime change in Washington, D.C., and the marching orders that everybody's publicly seeing on the news, and in light of what's going on, you know, especially with the 130,000 deportation -- criminal alien deportation warrants that are active out in our nation, and the reality is there's a percentage of them here in Florida. I don't have any hard numbers yet. I did have a meeting with Undersheriff Bloom yesterday, and we discussed possibly -- because if you're not aware, we participated back in the late 2000 -- 2008 or 2009, I believe it was. We were heavily participating the 287(g) program. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: We still do. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: And we still do. It's still an active program but, of course, different regimes do certain funding or don't. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: The second portion of that deportation wasn't taken -- wasn't really going well -- CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Yeah. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: -- but our sheriff's been doing a great job. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: No, our sheriff is doing a great job. It's just the fact that the feds have to accept the bodies. I hate to use January 28, 2025 Page 91 that term, but that's the reality. And over the last four years, it hasn't been a cooperation to actually process. When we come across a criminal that commits a crime here in Collier County, they are then taken to our jail. There's an AFIS done. FCIC/NCIS check on every individual that enters the jail system. And there's been -- and over the past four years, there has been active warrants for these individuals for deportation. And the process typically was they take that information. They do a packet on it. The 287G, the individuals in the jail that are trained, they start a process to -- for U.S. Customs and the ICE agents, and then is has to go to the Krome, which is the federal holding facility over in Miami. But they weren't accepting them. So -- so over the last four years -- I don't have a hard number. I'm sure we'll get an idea. And I don't want to quote anything or misquote any number. But there was a lot over the last four, even within the last year, that served their 30 days for petty theft or whatever it was, driving without a license, and they had to be released back into our community again, and they still have an outstanding warrant because the feds wouldn't accept it. That's going to change. I think we all see the writing on the wall right now that that is not going to be the way it's going moving forward. So knowing there's a certain number out there and that our discussion was that -- you know, we've had a -- just without even the program, we've had a steady uptick over the past several years from an average daily inmate count from, like, 650 to, like, right now we're around 750 people, on average, a day within our jail system. Just within that uptick naturally, because of population change, and growth, you know, you're going to have more numbers. But if we're going to possibly have a possibility -- which I'd like Mr. Mullins, at some point, to come up here and explain what was January 28, 2025 Page 92 going on in Tallahassee in a moment. If -- I know it's going to be hard, yeah. He's Roman Catholic, evidently. But with that being said, there was probably, like, 11 counties who participated in the jail side of that program and about five that participated in the active investigative side. We were one of those five of the active investigation, one of the 11. And even back then, Krome was overwhelmed with the amount of warrants coming in for deportation. And from what -- in light of what the governor wanted to do, Mr. Mullins can probably explain a little better than I did in what he was trying to do this week, or attempted to do, was basically increase the 67 counties participating. So, Mr. Mullins, if you want to go ahead and bring everybody up to speed on what -- MR. MULLINS: This is John Mullins, your director of Communications, Government, and Public Affairs. And I will try to do my best to do it in a nutshell. Basically, the governor had called the legislature in previously to act on immigration reforms. He had put together a package of things that he would like to see the legislature consider. The legislative decided to do pushback on that request, and yesterday they convened in special session for the governor, based on his call, and basically immediately adjourned that special session. They then reconvened their own special session with their own slate of ideas for immigration reform and advanced that policy through. Now, I can't give you a point-by-point comparison of what the governor proposed and the legislature ended up advancing yesterday, but I have that information, and I can get it to you quickly after this meeting. January 28, 2025 Page 93 CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Thank you, John. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: And it was quite a bit different? I mean, do you know that for sure? It was -- COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Very different. COMMISSIONER LoCASTRO: Yeah, that's what I thought. It was way different. MR. MULLINS: There was quite a bit of back and forth yesterday between the governor posting on social media and the legislative leadership responding in writing and press releases. So it depends on which camp you're in. If you're in camp legislature, you may think their package is a little better. If you're in camp governor, you probably think that that package is a little better. I think you just really have to parse the details of both and determine what your point of view is. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Thank you, John. And where I'm going with this, I have -- you know, regardless of where the State of Florida ends up in their policies on how much they want to actively take a part in enforcing it, but I feel that our sheriff -- I mean, I don't want to speak for our sheriff, but I feel we are a law-and-order type community here and that I don't think we're going to go against the federal government's demand for assistance when it comes down to actually processing and detaining these people with the active warrants, as in you see some of these sanctuary cities that are pushing back that -- you know, the consequences aren't going to be good because you just can't harbor an active -- a person who has an active warrant from the federal government. We're going to participate. So that being said, we may be looking -- I don't know if we can possibly get somebody -- a representative from the Sheriff's Department to maybe give us a deeper dive on this at our next meeting, I believe on -- the 11th is our next commission meeting? January 28, 2025 Page 94 MS. PATTERSON: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Because we're doing our legislative trip on the 18th. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Right. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: So this may change some of our ask moving forward, because I have a feeling that we're moving forward reopening the stockade in Immokalee. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Perfect. Two hundred beds out there. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: There's about 200, 250 beds in the open-bay-type style, and what -- two things -- the problem is, if we do, we may have certain things that we may have to do to bring it up to speed to pass the inspection, because if we do use it for the housing for the federal prisoners while they're in detention to wait to go to Krome, they do an inspection process that requires -- and then they reimburse the county for each person being held, and that's something I think the Sheriff is going to enter into a renegotiation on what that value is going to be for reimbursement, because I think in the past it was around $71, and that's probably well low [sic] what it would actually cost us to house an individual in population. But -- so these are the type of things we may have to take into consideration as quickly as maybe some asks for some grants or -- who knows. Maybe we can get some partnership where maybe -- because it's going to take manpower. And, you know, how it works, we hire manpower for the maximum amount of prisoners that are held, not the minimum. And even when we don't have the maximum number, we don't lay these people off or fire them. We have to keep them on hand. So there may be a push to get manpower, too, because of the population increase. Because we have no clue where it's going to go with the legislators, if this is something that, you know, the rest of the January 28, 2025 Page 95 counties are going to participate in or not, that's going to put a big stress on the federal prison system here in Florida, and we may have longer terms of holding these people on these warrants within our own housing facilities. So that being said, we may -- I mean, even if there's a possibility to man it with some federal prison guards, you know, as a possible staging area for these individuals while they're waiting, it may even be something in the future. But I don't know. But this may change our ask when we go to Tallahassee for some grant money to make sure we're up to speed to get ahead of it before it becomes too late, so... And one other thing I know that came out of the meeting was possibly looking at another master plan for the jail. I think Commissioner Hall had mentioned something -- I heard you saying something about the female dorm for the mental health dorm. I actually had an opportunity to go in there the other day and check it out. Basically, it's not even a mental health dorm. They took a normal pod, and they tried to convert it into a mental health dorm, which we have an actual men's mental health dorm. Well, the way it's designed is you have -- the CO sits in the middle, and they have a nurse, and they have a station that they observe all the patients at the time they're being held there under criminal charges. And they have access, and they have views into the cells, and it's just a more efficient type way. And the female one is not like that, and it's just a normal pod that has elevated cells, and that they've -- in the past they've actually had people commit suicide by jumping from the balcony. They had to go in and makeshift some fencing and weld some fencing up there to keep that from happening. And then we have a CO that actually just sits at a folding table January 28, 2025 Page 96 right in the middle of the populated area, you know, amongst the inmates, with a nurse. So it's just not conducive to what a typical mental health jail cell would be configured. So they're looking to do another master plan. But they want to be part of, you know, whoever gets the contract to do the design or the planning because they just don't want somebody to come back and say, "Oh, just build another building," or "add on to your building." They want to try to retrofit some empty space they have. So I think we can do -- have us -- at least have their ideas, their inputs on, you know, who we pick to do this master plan again, because they haven't had one since 2016. So it might be time. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yep. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Yes, Commissioner McDaniel. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I sat in when the Sheriff hired the consultants from California to do the last master plan, and your participation in the Juvenile Justice Advisory Committee is key to success, because the entire master planning process deals only with the adult population, the actual population that we have. Little regard, if any, is given to the pipeline that feeds that adult population. So as you're moving through this process, focus the energies on the pipeline, then the necessity for attending the adult population, over time, should reduce. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Okay. We'll do that. So it's kind of like full circle. We're kind of coming around. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yeah, it is. Imagine that. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: But if the Board would be okay if the Sheriff or his representative, in the next meeting, bring forward some hard numbers and what they feel they're going to need to move forward to get ahead of this before it's too late, I'd like to have that entertained, and that way we have the information before the 18th in case we have to change our marching orders when we head up to January 28, 2025 Page 97 Tallahassee. But that's all I have. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Hit the gavel. CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Anything else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KOWAL: Nothing? All right. I guess we're adjourned. ***** ****Commissioner McDaniel moved, seconded by Commissioner Hall, and carried that the following items under the consent and summary agendas be approved and/or adopted**** Item #16A1 FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE POTABLE WATER AND SEWER UTILITY FACILITIES AND ACCEPT THE CONVEYANCE OF THE POTABLE WATER AND SEWER UTILITY FACILITIES AND APPURTENANT UTILITY EASEMENT FOR CAYMAS PHASE ONE – PHASE 1E & 1F, PL20240006738 - FINAL INSPECTION ON OCTOBER 14, 2024, FOUND THESE FACILITIES TO BE SATISFACTORY AND ACCEPTABLE Item #16A2 FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE POTABLE WATER UTILITY FACILITIES FOR NCH BUSINESS CENTER STERILE PROCESSING DEPARTMENT, PL20240012598 Item #16A3 January 28, 2025 Page 98 RESOLUTION 2025-21: A RESOLUTION FOR FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PRIVATE ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PLAT DEDICATIONS FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF GREYHAWK AT GOLF CLUB OF THE EVERGLADES PHASE 3, APPLICATION NUMBER PL20180001192, AND AUTHORIZE THE RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $119,996.59 Item #16A4 RESOLUTION 2025-22: A RESOLUTION FOR FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PRIVATE ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PLAT DEDICATIONS FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF ISLES OF COLLIER PRESERVE PHASE 14, APPLICATION NUMBER PL20190002012, AND AUTHORIZE THE RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $739,407.70 Item #16A5 THE CLERK OF COURTS TO RELEASE A PERFORMANCE BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,520, WHICH WAS POSTED AS A DEVELOPMENT GUARANTEE FOR AN EARLY WORK AUTHORIZATION (EWA) FOR WORK ASSOCIATED WITH PRIMA AUTO CONDOS, PL20240009535 Item #16A6 January 28, 2025 Page 99 RECORDING THE PLAT OF SANTA BARBARA PLACE VILLAS, APPROVAL OF THE STANDARD FORM CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, AND APPROVAL OF THE PERFORMANCE SECURITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $995,967.50. (APPLICATION NUMBER PL20240002384) - A SUBDIVISION OF LANDS LOCATED IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Item #16A7 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED TEMPORARY USE (SPECIAL EVENT) PERMIT FOR THE COUNTRY JAM CONCERT PROPOSED FOR THE PARADISE COAST SPORTS COMPLEX ON MARCH 1, 2025, LOCATED AT 3865 CITY GATE BLVD S., NAPLES, FL 34117, IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Item #16A8 ARBORX INC., AS A QUALIFIED APPLICANT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY BASIC INDUSTRY GROWTH PROMOTION INCENTIVE PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE THE ATTACHED AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT “CARBO” AND APPROVE ALL NECESSARY BUDGET AMENDMENTS Item #16A9 January 28, 2025 Page 100 A SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT AND THE ROAD CLOSURES THAT ARE NECESSARY FOR THE ANNUAL EVERGLADES SEAFOOD FESTIVAL TO BE HELD FEBRUARY 5 – 10, 2024, IN EVERGLADES CITY, IN ORDER TO FULFILL COLLIER COUNTY’S SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR ROAD CLOSURES - ROAD CLOSURES OF SECTIONS OF COUNTY ROAD 29 (CR 29) Item #16B1 THE PURCHASE OF A DRAINAGE EASEMENT (PARCEL 148DE) REQUIRED FOR THE WEST GOODLETTE-FRANK ROAD AREA STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PHASE 2 (PROJECT NO. 60142). ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT: $46,328 Item #16B2 AGREEMENT FOR THE PURCHASE OF RIGHT OF WAY (PARCEL 1364FEE) REQUIRED FOR THE VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD EXT – PHASE 2 PROJECT (PROJECT NO. 60249). ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT: $82,483 Item #16B3 – Continued to the February 11, 2025, Meeting (Per Agenda Change Sheet) PURCHASE AND SALES AGREEMENT WITH JOSEPH D. STEWART, P.A. FOR THE PURCHASE OF UNIT 105, WHICH IS THE LAST REMAINING AVAILABLE UNIT TO PURCHASE OUT OF 18 CONDOMINIUM OFFICE UNITS WITHIN THE COURT PLAZA III BUILDING SITUATED ON 1.17 IMPROVED January 28, 2025 Page 101 ACRES ON AIRPORT ROAD SOUTH, ADJACENT TO THE GOVERNMENT CENTER, FOR THE COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION. (THIS ITEM IS A COMPANION TO Item #16B4) Item #16B4 – Continued to the February 11, 2025, Meeting (Per Agenda Change Sheet) PURCHASE AND SALES AGREEMENT AND ADDENDUM WITH BIGI & BIGI, LLC, THE PURCHASE OF 14 OUT OF 18 CONDOMINIUM OFFICE UNITS WITHIN THE COURT PLAZA III BUILDING SITUATED ON 1.17 IMPROVED ACRES ON AIRPORT ROAD SOUTH, ADJACENT TO THE GOVERNMENT CENTER, FOR THE COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION, AND AUTHORIZE ANY ASSOCIATED BUDGET AMENDMENTS. (THIS ITEM IS A COMPANION TO Item #16B3) Item #16B5 AWARD A WORK/PURCHASE ORDER FOR A REQUEST FOR QUOTATION (“RFQ”) FOR THE 17TH STREET SW AT KEANE AVENUE STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT UNDER AGREEMENT NO. 20-7800, “UNDERGROUND CONTRACTOR SERVICES,” TO MITCHELL & STARK CONSTRUCTION, CO, INC., IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $824,068.44, WHICH INCLUDES A BASE BID AMOUNT OF $749,153.13 AND AN OWNER’S ALLOWANCE OF $74,915.31, APPROVE THE NECESSARY BUDGET AMENDMENT AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE ATTACHED WORK/PURCHASE ORDER. (PROJECT NUMBER 50238) January 28, 2025 Page 102 Item #16B6 RESOLUTION 2025-23: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE SECTION 5311 PUBLIC TRANSIT GRANT AGREEMENT (FPN 410120-1-84-43) WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ACCEPT FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION GRANT FUNDING IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $1,568,510 TO PROVIDE TRANSIT SERVICE TO THE RURAL AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE NECESSARY BUDGET AMENDMENTS. (CAT GRANT FUND 4031) Item #16B7 A DONATION OF SAND FROM STEWART MATERIALS RECEIVED BY COLLIER COUNTY IN ADVANCE OF HURRICANE HELENE AND MILTON'S LANDFALLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,968 Item #16B8 RESOLUTION 2025-24: A RESOLUTION AND DISTRICT OFFICE LEASE AMENDMENT WITH CONGRESSMAN MARIO DIAZ-BALART FOR ADDITIONAL COUNTY-OWNED OFFICE SPACE. (2025-33) Item #16B9 AWARD A WORK/PURCHASE ORDER FOR A REQUEST FOR QUOTATION (“RFQ”) FOR THE 23RD STREET SW AT KEANE AVENUE STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT UNDER January 28, 2025 Page 103 AGREEMENT NO. 20-7800, "UNDERGROUND CONTRACTOR SERVICES," TO MITCHELL & STARK CONSTRUCTION, CO., INC., IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $879,811.90, WHICH INCLUDES A BASE BID AMOUNT OF $799.829.00 AND AN OWNER’S ALLOWANCE OF $79,982.90, APPROVE THE NECESSARY BUDGET AMENDMENT AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE ATTACHED PURCHASE ORDER. (PROJECT NUMBER 50238) - AS DETAILED IN THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Item #16B10 WORK ORDER WITH HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE APPLICATION OF A MODIFICATION TO USACE PERMIT NO. AJ-2004-07621(IP-MJD) TO ALLOW DREDGED SAND TO BE PLACED ON DELNOR- WIGGINS STATE PARK BEACH, UNDER THE CURRENT LIBRARY SERVICES CONTRACT 18- 7432-CZ FOR TIME AND MATERIAL ESTIMATED AT $21,245; AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE THE WORK ORDER; AND MAKE A FINDING THAT THIS ITEM PROMOTES TOURISM Item #16B11 AWARD INVITATION TO BID (“ITB”) NO. 24-8325, “CONCRETE: SIDEWALKS, CURBS & GUTTERS, AND RELATED ITEMS,” TO PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE, LLC (PRIMARY), NATIONAL TRAFFIC SOLUTION, INC. (SECONDARY), AND COASTAL CONCRETE PRODUCTS, January 28, 2025 Page 104 LLC, D/B/A COASTAL SITE DEVELOPMENT (TERTIARY), AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE ATTACHED AGREEMENTS Item #16B12 AWARD INVITATION TO BID (“ITB”) NO. 24-8290 “IRRIGATION PUMP STATION MAINTENANCE, REPAIRS, AND SERVICES” TO AGRICULTURAL SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, LLC, AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT - TO OBTAIN SERVICES FROM A CONTRACTOR FOR PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE, REPAIRS, AND SERVICES FOR IRRIGATION PUMP STATIONS. Item #16C1 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT (CCWSD), AWARD INVITATION TO BID (“ITB”) #24-8228, “CRANE RENTAL SERVICES,” TO MAXIM CRANE WORKS, L.P., AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE ATTACHED AGREEMENT Item #16D1 AWARD INVITATION TO BID (“ITB”) NO. 24-8294, “SENIOR MEAL PROGRAM,” TO G.A. FOOD SERVICES OF PINELLAS COUNTY, LLC, AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE ATTACHED AGREEMENT - TO CONTINUE TO PROVIDE HOME DELIVERED AND CONGREGATE MEAL SERVICES FOR THE SENIOR NUTRITION PROGRAM FURTHERING THE January 28, 2025 Page 105 COUNTY’S STRATEGIC PLAN THROUGH IMPROVING ACCESS TO HEALTH, WELLNESS, AND HUMAN SERVICE Item #16D2 RESOLUTION 2025-25: APPROVED TECHNICAL REVISIONS AND CLARIFYING LANGUAGE TO THE COLLIER COUNTY STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES PARTNERSHIP LOCAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 2022-2023, 2023-2024, AND 2024-2025 DISASTER ASSISTANCE AND RENTAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES; AND A SHIP FY 2021/2022 EXPENDITURE EXTENSION TO JUNE 30, 2025. (SHIP GRANT FUND 1053) Item #16D3 A STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES PARTNERSHIP (SHIP) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY AND MHP FL VII, LLLP TO FURTHER AFFORDABLE HOUSING INITIATIVES THROUGH A $1,246,600.80 IMPACT FEE LOAN FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION OF RENTAL HOUSING UNITS AT THE EKO CADENZA DEVELOPMENT AND AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ANY AND ALL SHIP-RELATED SUBORDINATION AGREEMENTS FOR THIS PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOU. (SHIP GRANT FUND 1053) Item #16E1 A THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT NO. 15-6474R, January 28, 2025 Page 106 “MEDICAL DIRECTOR FOR COLLIER COUNTY AND EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS AND DRUG TESTING,” WITH ADVANCE MEDICAL OF NAPLES, LLC Item #16E2 THE ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT PREPARED BY THE PROCUREMENT SERVICES DIVISION FOR VARIOUS COUNTY DIVISIONS’ AFTER-THE-FACT PURCHASES REQUIRING BOARD APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCUREMENT ORDINANCE 2017-08, AS AMENDED, AND THE PROCUREMENT MANUAL, IN THE AMOUNT OF $49,613.51 Item #16E3 THE ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT PREPARED BY THE PROCUREMENT SERVICES DIVISION FOR VARIOUS COUNTY DIVISIONS’ AFTER-THE-FACT PURCHASES REQUIRING BOARD APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCUREMENT ORDINANCE 2017-08, AS AMENDED, AND THE PROCUREMENT MANUAL, IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,129.87 Item #16E4 RATIFY PROPERTY, CASUALTY, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION AND SUBROGATION CLAIM FILES SETTLED AND/OR CLOSED BY THE RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION DIRECTOR PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 04-15 FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF FY 25 January 28, 2025 Page 107 Item #16E5 THIRD EXTENSION AND AMENDMENT TO THE SERVICE- LEARNING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND THE COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH JANUARY 24, 2029 - TO CONTINUE TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES TO STUDENTS AT FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY (FGCU) Item #16E6 ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT ASSIGNING ALL RIGHTS, DUTIES, BENEFITS, AND OBLIGATIONS TO INTEGRITY ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC, CONCERNING AGREEMENT NO. 18-7432-SW, “PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIBRARY SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING CATEGORY.” Item #16E7 MODIFICATIONS TO THE 2025 FISCAL YEAR PAY & CLASSIFICATION PLAN WHICH CONSISTS OF TWO NEW CLASSIFICATIONS, TWO RECLASSIFICATIONS, AND REMOVAL OF ONE OBSOLETE CLASSIFICATION FROM OCTOBER 1, 2024, THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2024 Item #16F1 January 28, 2025 Page 108 EXPENDITURE OF UP TO $10,000 OF TOURISM DEVELOPMENT TAX (TDT) PROMOTION FUNDS TO SUPPORT THE UPCOMING MARCH 2025 TRILOGY LACROSSE EVENT AND MAKE A FINDING THAT THESE EXPENDITURES PROMOTE TOURISM Item #16F2 THE USE OF THE PARADISE COAST SPORTS COMPLEX FOR THE PURPOSE OF A CIVILIAN LANDING SITE BY THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES FOR A LACROSSE GAME, AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE ATTACHED HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT Item #16F3 RENEW THE ANNUAL CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY (COPCN) FOR JUST LIKE FAMILY CONCIERGE MEDICAL TRANSPORT SERVICES, D/B/A BREWSTER AMBULANCE SERVICE, TO PROVIDE CLASS 2 ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT (ALS) INTER-FACILITY TRANSPORT AMBULANCE SERVICE FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR Item #16F4 RESOLUTION 2025-26: A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS (APPROPRIATING GRANTS, DONATIONS, CONTRIBUTIONS OR INSURANCE PROCEEDS) TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 ADOPTED BUDGET. (THE BUDGET AMENDMENTS IN THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION HAVE January 28, 2025 Page 109 BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS VIA SEPARATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES.) Item #16F5 AWARD INVITATION TO BID (“ITB”) NO. 24-8314, CONSTRUCTION OF THE BIG CORKSCREW ISLAND REGIONAL PARK PHASE 2A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ON OIL WELL ROAD AT BIG CORKSCREW DRIVE, TO QUALITY ENTERPRISES USA, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,442,394.00, APPROVE A $200,000.00 OWNER’S ALLOWANCE, AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE ATTACHED AGREEMENT. (PROJECT NO. 80039) Item #16F6 – (Continued to a Future Meeting, Per Agenda Change Sheet) CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, ADDING 180 DAYS TO THE PROJECT TIME UNDER AGREEMENT NO. 22-7951 WITH CHRIS -TEL COMPANY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC., D/B/A CHRIS- TEL CONSTRUCTION, TO SUPPORT THE REMAINING PRE- CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE COURTHOUSE MULTI- PROJECT EXECUTION CONTRACT, AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE ATTACHED CHANGE ORDER. (PROJECT NO. 50235) Item #16F7 CHANGE ORDER NO. 6, ADDING $98,582.08 TO THE CONTRACT AMOUNT UNDER AGREEMENT NO. 22-7960 January 28, 2025 Page 110 WITH WAYPOINT CONTRACTING, INC., FOR THE COLLIER COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICE CENTER EAST BAY ENCLOSURE, AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE ATTACHED CHANGE ORDER. (PROJECT NO. 50390) Item #16G1 CHANGE ORDER NO. 2, ADDING FOUR DAYS TO THE CONTRACT TIME AND USE $12,626.46 FROM THE OWNER'S ALLOWANCE FOR WORK DIRECTIVE #2 UNDER AGREEMENT NO. 23-8120 (PURCHASE ORDER 4500229417) WITH DEC CONTRACTING GROUP, INC., FOR THE “BULK AIRCRAFT HANGAR AT MARCO ISLAND EXECUTIVE AIRPORT,” AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE ATTACHED CHANGE ORDER. (PROJECT NO. 33822) Item #16J1 TO RECORD IN THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THE CHECK NUMBER (OR OTHER PAYMENT METHOD), AMOUNT, PAYEE, AND PURPOSE FOR WHICH THE REFERENCED DISBURSEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $48,183,993.95 WERE DRAWN FOR THE PERIODS BETWEEN JANUARY 2, 2025, AND JANUARY 15, 2025, PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTE 136.06 Item #16J2 January 28, 2025 Page 111 THE BOARD APPROVE AND DETERMINE VALID PUBLIC PURPOSE FOR INVOICES PAYABLE AND PURCHASING CARD TRANSACTIONS AS OF JANUARY 22, 2025 Item #16K1 THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO MAKE A SETTLEMENT OFFER OF $15,000, AS A NUISANCE THRESHOLD FOR LITIGATION STRATEGY PURPOSES, IN THE MATTER STYLED TERRI HOHMANN DAKAN ET AL. V. COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, CASE NO. 23-CA-2715, PENDING IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Item #16K2 AN INSURANCE SETTLEMENT WHEREBY THE COUNTY WILL RECEIVE $9,157.44 TO SETTLE AND RELEASE THE COUNTY’S CLAIM AGAINST EVANGELINA SIERRA HAVRAN FOR COSTS INCURRED TO REPLACE A DAMAGED LIGHT POLE, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE THE RELEASE Item #16K3 RESOLUTION 2025-27: A RESOLUTION REAPPOINTING TWO MEMBERS TO THE LAND ACQUISITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE – APPOINTING RHYS WATKINS AND MICHELE LENHARD WITH TERMS EXPIRING ON FEBRUARY 11, 2028 Item #16K4 January 28, 2025 Page 112 AN AMENDMENT TO A MEDIATED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH QUALITY ENTERPRISES USA, INC., CONCERNING DESIGN-BUILD AGREEMENT NO. 20-7708, PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE VETERAN’S MEMORIAL BOULEVARD EXTENSION PHASE I PROJECT, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE ATTACHED AMENDED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Item #17A ORDINANCE 2025- 05: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TO CREATE THE TAMIAMI TRAIL GREENWAY ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT, TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 300 MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL UNITS WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND UP TO 64,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF COMMERCIAL INTERMEDIATE, C-3 ZONING DISTRICT USES, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED NORTH OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, APPROXIMATELY 441 FEET WEST OF INTERSECTION OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST AND GREENWAY ROAD, IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 24.41± ACRES. PL20230008643- (GMPA) (THIS ITEM IS A COMPANION TO ITEM #17B) Item #17B January 28, 2025 Page 113 ORDINANCE 2025-06: AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT PARTLY WITH AN AIRPORT ZONING OVERLAY TO A MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT PARTLY WITH AN AIRPORT ZONING OVERLAY FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS TAMIAMI TRAIL GREENWAY ROAD MPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 300 MULTI- FAMILY RENTAL UNITS WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AND UP TO 64,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF COMMERCIAL INTERMEDIATE (C-3) ZONING DISTRICT USES ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, APPROXIMATELY 441 FEET WEST OF INTERSECTION OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST AND GREENWAY ROAD, IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST; CONSISTING OF 24.41± ACRES. (THIS ITEM IS A COMPANION TO ITEM #17A) Item #17C RESOLUTION 2025-28: A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS (APPROPRIATING CARRY FORWARD, TRANSFERS AND SUPPLEMENTAL REVENUE) TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 ADOPTED BUDGET. (THE BUDGET AMENDMENTS IN THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS VIA SEPARATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES.) Item #17D - (Continued to the February 11, 2025, BCC Meeting) January 28, 2025 Page 114 RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ESTABLISH PROVISIONS FOR FOOD TRUCK PARKS AND MOBILE FOOD DISPENSING VEHICLES. (SECOND OF TWO HEARINGS) (THIS ITEM IS A COMPANION TO 17E) (2024- 2205) Item #17E - (Continued to the February 11, 2025, BCC Meeting) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT, WHICH WAS CREATED BY ORDINANCE NO. 2013-57, BY AMENDING THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES TO CREATE AN APPLICATION FOR MOBILE FOOD DISPENSING VEHICLES, PERMANENT, PERMIT. (THIS ITEM IS A COMPANION TO 17D) (2024-2224) Item #17F – (Continued from the January 14, 2025, BCC Meeting, And further continued and to be readvertised. RECOMMENDATION TO REPEAL AND REPLACE PROCUREMENT ORDINANCE NO. 2013-69, AS AMENDED, WITH THE ATTACHED UPDATED PROCUREMENT ORDINANCE. (2025-320) January 28, 2025 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 1 :00 p.m. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL Ae-ejt,e,ezie•ii."--- BURT SAUNDERS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST gC, Y,STAL K. KINZEL, CLERK These minutes approve by the Board on 1 ? I c 5 , as presented or as corrected . TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF FORT MYERS COURT REPORTING BY TERRI L. LEWIS, REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL COURT REPORTER, FPR-C, AND NOTARY PUBLIC. Page 115