Loading...
Immokalee MSTU Minutes 12/11/2024 Enclosure 1 1 MINUTES Joint Meeting of the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency Immokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board and the Immokalee MSTU Advisory Committee on December 11, 2024. The Advisory Board members, staff, and public appeared virtually and in person. Hybrid Remote Public Meeting CareerSource 750 South 5th Street Immokalee, FL 34142 A. Call to Order. The meeting was called to order by CRA Chair Mark Lemke at 8:32 A.M. B. Pledge of Allegiance and Moment of Silence. Mark Lemke led the Pledge of Allegiance and Mike Facundo led the opening prayer. C. Roll Call and Announcement of a Quorum. Christie Betancourt opened roll call. A quorum was announced for the CRA and MSTU Board. CRA Advisory Board Members Present in Person: Mark Lemke, Patricia Anne Goodnight, Mike Facundo, Andrea Halman, Edward “Ski” Olesky, Lupita Vazquez Reyes, and Paul Thein. CRA Advisory Board Members Present via Zoom: None. CRA Advisory Board Members Absent/Excused: Estil Null and Yvar Pierre. MSTU Advisory Committee Members Present: Andrea Halman, Bernardo Barnhart, David Turrubiartez Jr., Cherryle Thomas, and Jimmy Nieves (8:38 A.M.). MSTU Advisory Committee Members Present via Zoom: None. MSTU Advisory Committee Members Absent/Excused: None. Others Present in Person: Canon Sandora, Bill Glass, Sylvia Ocanas, Jorge Ocanas, Evelyn Bahena, Mauricio Perez, Maria C. Huapilla, Jacinto Cervantes, Illiana Montez, Armando Yzaguirre, Carlos Garcia, Sarah Harrington, Lucio Quintana, Dusty Hansen, and Commissioner Bill McDaniel. Others Present via Zoom: Cristina Perez, Katiria Ocanas, Lorraine Lantz, Melissa Silva, Rosemary Ocanas, Sean Kingston, and Tricia De Cambra, Sonal Dodia and Colleen Ross. Staff Present in Person: John Dunnuck, Christie Betancourt, Yvonne Blair, and Yuridia Zaragoza. D. Voting Privileges for Board Members via Zoom Staff announced no members will present via Zoom. No Action taken. E. Approval of Agenda. Staff presented the Agenda to the Boards for approval. Agenda was approved as presented. Page 1749 of 2001 Enclosure 1 2 CRA Action: Ms. Patricia Anne Goodnight made a motion to approve the Agenda as presented. Ms. Andrea Halman seconded the motion, and it passed by unanimous vote. 7-0. MSTU Action: Mr. David Turrubiartez Jr. made a motion to approve the Agenda as presented. Ms. Cherryle Thomas seconded the motion, and it passed by unanimous vote. 4-0. F. Approval of Consent Agenda 1. Minutes i. Joint CRA & MSTU Advisory Board Meeting for October 16, 2024 (Enclosure 1) ii. MSTU Advisory Committee Meeting for November 13, 2024 (Enclosure 2) 2. Budget Reports (Enclosure 3) 3. Code Enforcement Report (Enclosure 4) 4. Staff Reports i. Assistant Director Report (Enclosure 5) ii. Project Manager Report (Enclosure 6) iii. Project Observation Field Report (Enclosure 7) iv. Community Meetings (Enclosure 8) Staff presented the Consent Agenda to the Boards for approval. Consent Agenda was approved as presented. CRA Action: Ms. Patricia Anne Goodnight made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Ms. Lupita Vazquez Reyes seconded the motion, and it passed by unanimous vote. 7-0. MSTU Action: Mr. David Turrubiartez Jr. made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Ms. Cherryle Thomas seconded the motion, and it passed by unanimous vote. 4-0. G. Announcements. 1. Public Comments speaker slips CRA Staff reiterated on the public 3-minute speaker slip policy for each Topic. The Board will give more time if they feel it necessary. 2. Communications Folder Staff reviewed the communication folder with the board and members of the public. The folder included the public notice for the Joint CRA and MSTU meeting, Collier Area Transit (CAT) survey, the Community Campus attachments provided at the Neighborhood Information Meeting, Notice for the Neighborhood Information Meeting for the Sainvilus Development, Cowboy Christmas and Cherryle Thomas Christmas Around the World Parade and Gala Event flyer. A thank you letter by the CRA Staff to all participants and for other county staff who helped was presented as well. CRA Staff thanked everyone for the success of the 11th Annual Christmas Tree Lighting. Staff also thanked Mr. Armando Yzaguirre and his team for decorating the Zocalo Plaza and the Christmas Tree. His staff trimmed the trees, added mulch to the area, and picked up trash. Overall, the area looked very nice. Page 1750 of 2001 Enclosure 1 3 Mr. Armando Yzaguirre commented that his wife deserves all the credit for the decorating of the Tree and Zocalo Plaza. He hopes this event continues so that they may continue to serve the community in this way. He provided a couple of maintenance updates, the banner arms are up on the poles that have been fixed, A&M staff are waiting on some of the poles. As soon as they are provided, they will put them up as well. Mr. Yzaguirre reiterated that he and his team enjoy serving the community and they hope to continue doing so. Ms. Christie Betancourt commented that staff have received a complaint that a couple of the angels on the light poles are out. This is due to the transformer. Due to the time now, staff will not be able to fix it this year, however, they will make sure this is fixed for the upcoming year. Mr. Armando Yzaguirre commented that when he puts the decorations on the poles, he has no power in the daytime due to the timer. Next year, a schedule could be done to solve some of these issues in this matter. Ms. Andrea Halman commented that this event has been held for 10 years now and the number of cookies has not increased. Many people are coming to this event, and they are enjoying it. She commented that staff cannot get rid of this event. She hopes that more cookies can be purchased as more community members continue to attend this event. Ms. Patricia Anne Goodnight provided information on what is set to be discussed at the Immokalee Water and Sewer District Meeting. She commented that a group of people would like to discuss with Immokalee Water and Sewer District from eliminating fluoride in their water. She has always worked to protect Immokalee, and in her opinion, eliminating fluoride from the water will affect many. The meeting will be held at 3:30 p.m. on Wednesday, December 20, 2024, at the Immokalee Water and Sewer District office. 3. Public Meeting Calendar (Enclosure 9) i. Proposed 2025 Meeting Calendar Staff presented the proposed 2025 Meeting Calendar. Both Boards are set to meet jointly on January, June, July, October, November, and December for 2025. The schedule could change depending on what staff brings forward for the merging of the boards. A decision for the Chair and Vice-Chair will be made by the board in January 2025. Staff will provide any further updates. Staff also included the 2025 Holiday Schedule that the Board of Collier County Commissioners follow. Boards approved the 2025 Calendar as presented noting that meeting dates will change if board merger is approved. CRA Action: Ms. Patricia Anne Goodnight made a motion to approve the 2025 Public Meeting Calendar as presented. Ms. Lupita Vazquez Reyes seconded the motion, and it passed by unanimous vote. 7-0. Page 1751 of 2001 Enclosure 1 4 MSTU Action: Mr. David Turrubiartez Jr. made a motion to approve the 2025 Public Meeting Calendar as presented. Ms. Cherryle Thomas seconded the motion, and it passed by unanimous vote. 5-0. H. Other Agencies 1. FDOT Updates No updates. 2. Other Community Agencies No updates. I. Community Presentations 1. Sainvilus Subdivision – Canon Sandora, PE (Enclosure 10) Mr. Canon Sandora introduced himself and Mr. Bill Glass. Mr. Canon Sandora is the Civil Engineer for this project and Mr. Bill Glass is the Architect. Mr. Sandora commented that the developer is local, and his name is Mr. James Sainvilus. Mr. Canon Sandora provided information on the property. There is an existing house on the property. The property is four and a half acres. The property is located South of Roberts Ave and North of Forrester Ave. The developer is going through a Planned Unit Development (PUD) process with Collier County to allow for the development of 27 units total. Mr. Canon Sandora presented the conceptual plan of this development. They are proposing 13 buildings that are 2 single-family with a zero-lot-line attached and one common wall. The buildings will be on their own lot but are attached by one common wall. For lot 27, there will be a single- family home for the developers’ parents to live at, the existing home will be taken down. The current use for this property is for a Residential Single Family 3 (RSF-3), which is 3 units per acre. The PUD would allow for 6 units per acre, which is under the Immokalee Future Land Use Plan, where land use for Medium Residential Subdistrict allows a base density of 6 units per acre. The developer is not going for affordable housing, so the developer will be able to choose the lot sizes that work for the site. There are plans to have one road coming down on Forrester Ave with a cul -de-sac at the end, which 24 units would access through Forrester where sidewalks will be put on both sides of the road. The other 3 units will have access through Roberts Ave, that is less of a road but allows them to keep a lot of retention area in case of a flooding. Mr. Sandora commented that the retention plan could vary since they are not at the final stages. He reiterated that this is all conceptual. For lots size RSF-3, 10,000 square feet is the minimum lot size, setbacks are 30 feet in the front, 25 feet in the rear, 7 and a half on the sides, the minimum widths are 95 feet, and th e corner lot and interior lot are 80 feet minimum width. They are proposing a minimum lot size of 3,900 square feet, front setback of 23 feet, rear setback of 15 feet, unattached side setback of 7.5 feet and a side setback to the Right of Way of 15 feet. Page 1752 of 2001 Enclosure 1 5 Mr. Mike Facundo asked for clarification on where the property is located and asked why lots 25, 26, and 27 are accessible only through Roberts Ave. He also asked if they have reached out to the neighbors in Forrester Ave. Mr. Canon Sandora commented that while doing the conceptual plan, the layout worked well with Forrester Ave. The traffic studies and the level of service did not change based on the 27 units. They have mailed letters to all neighbors surrounding the area. A neighborhood information will be held at the CareerSource SWFL Conference Room at 4:30 p.m. on December 11, 2024. Mr. Mark Lemke asked for clarification on the buildings and was confirmed that there’s one building on 2 lots. Mr. Patricia Anne Goodnight commented whether this is affordable housing and if individuals will be able to own or rent the homes. Mr. Canon Sandora said this development is not for affordable housing and the developer is planning for others to own the homes. The development will be for market rate housing. An Ad Valorem Tax would be paid for this development. Ms. Lupita Vazquez Reyes commented the idea for this property to increase housing that attracts service professionals such as teachers and firefighters. She hopes this development is an average cost for them. Mr. Bill Glass commented that Mr. James Sainvilus has been adamant about doing something that out of the ordinary. Mr. Sainvilus wanted to make these units multi-generational. They have designed 2 master bedrooms in the lower level with a master kitchen, living and dining room, and a 2-car garage. The higher level will consist of another master, 2 other bedrooms, and a big living room. He reiterated that this is still in the conceptual stages. Mr. Glass presented the elevations of the units. Ms. Christie Betancourt asked if this has been presented to the County. Mr. Canon Sandora commented that they are going through the PUD process, they are close to that point but have not presented anything yet. Ms. Lupita Vazquez Reyes asked who would be managing the property or if an HOA will be established. Mr. Bill Glass followed up and said that a few discussions have been made with Mr. James Sainvilus and it could be that an HOA is established. Ms. Cherryle Thomas asked when they anticipate starting this development, if all is approved. Mr. Bill Glass commented that he is unsure, it all depends on how Mr. James Sainvilus wants to phase this development. Page 1753 of 2001 Enclosure 1 6 Mr. Mark Lemke asked if they need an approval from the CRA Board. Mr. Canon Sandora commented that they are just presenting to the CRA Board to receive feedback. Ms. Andrea Halman commented on the roundabout in the plans presented and asked if they plan to stick with this concept. She mentioned that many people need to be able to get out of the property. She also asked if firetrucks will be able to go in and out of the property. Mr. Canon Sandora commented that it allows some space for retention area; by not having a complete road to Roberts Ave. He commented on the cul-de-sac, and said it would be helpful to have only the community members of the area go in the property and hopefully help alleviate others from coming in. As for firetrucks, they will be able to get in and out of the property, the County has a standard on this matter. Mr. Mike Facundo commented on the grid system and asked if it mirrors the existing grid system. Mr. Facundo provided brief information on a location in Gainesville, where the developer connected and tied into the city grid fabric. He asked if they have any consideration or any exploration on this. Mr. Canon Sandora commented that they have viewed into adding an exit onto Roberts Ave and have a road go all the way through, which will add another stop sign on Roberts Ave. He commented that this could lead into an additional interruption in traffic but by just having traffic go through Forrester, there will not be much interruption. Ms. Lupita Vazquez Reyes asked if there are any plans to extend Forrester Ave to Main Street. Ms. Christie Betancourt commented that this may be developed later but it’s not something that’s in the plan. A previous developer looking to get the area was planning to make an access all the way through. Mr. Mark Lemke asked on the amount of driveway for additional vehicles since the plans show for a 2-car garage. He provided concerns on having cars parked on the street or over the sidewalk if there’s not enough space. Mr. Mike Facundo further commented on the Arrowhead property in Immokalee and said that this is a good example of a development not having sufficient parking and how cars are piled up all over the yard and driveway. He also provided a few comments on the need of urban planning and gave an example of the TIGER grant and how there could have been more consideration into it. Overall, the goal is to have a development like this fit within the urban planning and create a neighborhood that fits with the community. Page 1754 of 2001 Enclosure 1 7 Mr. Canon Sandora commented that Mr. James Sainvilus is a local person, and he cares about the community, and how he probably understands the importance of taking in considerations such as landscaping and much more. Mr. Sandora provided information on the driveway and said there will be a 2-car garage and the driveaway will allow for about 4 vehicles to fit comfortably. Mr. Mike Facundo commented on the fact that Immokalee is a walking community and how we must consider others who will most likely have to walk around if there is no pathway to Roberts Ave. He said urban fabric allows not only for the vehicle to exist but for a person to be able to utilize and move around the area. Mr. Mark Lemke further commented on Mr. Mike Facundo point and said even though there is no exit road onto Roberts Ave, a sidewalk that comes out Roberts Ave would be nice so that community members can come out and get to Main Street Ms. Lupita Vazquez Reyes commented on a good example in Estero Park and said there’s a neighborhood that that is connected by a small trail to the park. She said this could be suggested to Mr. James Sainvilus and have him consider this as well. Mr. Bill Glass commented that having some sort of connectivity like a sidewalk or trail is a good idea, however, he doesn’t think that having open access for motor vehicles to go through is the best idea. Brief discussion was made that this development would not be a gated community. Ms. Lupita Vazquez Reyes addressed that the person wanting to invest in the community is local and is wanting to do something with the property that will bring some impact on the tax base and provide middle to higher income homes. Especially culturally, since there are many who want to live with their families. She agreed that there needs to be some way of helping alleviate others from zooming into this community, but she also believes that there should be some type of pedestrians’ connectivity since Immokalee is a walking community. She also elaborated on the access of food points. Mr. Bernardo Barnhart commented that he loves the concept of this development. This will help bring value to the community. Mr. Barnhart commented to Mr. Canon Sandora and Bill Glass that they may need to consider talking to Mr. James Sainvilus on the 2-car garage. Mr. Bernardo Barnhart said that Ave Maria is a good example and said nobody uses 2-car garage. The majority use it for either storage or as an extra room. Mr. Canon Sandora commented on the idea of the sidewalks and pedestrian connectivity. They will bring this up to Mr. James Sainvilus. Ms. Sylvia Ocanas commented and said that Immokalee is an agricultural town where many people have huge trucks. She said that they will have a clutter in the area where there is not going to be a pathway. Page 1755 of 2001 Enclosure 1 8 She does not see why there’s not 2 entrances and why they choose Forrester Ave as the access point if Forrester Ave is a dead-end street. She cannot imagine having 2 houses on that acreage and being able to keep it cleaned up and appropriate for the kids to play. She acknowledged that this would be a good tax money revenue, however, there will be a lot of traffic on a dead-end street. She lives on Forrester Ave., and she commented that she is not satisfied with any kind of housing going on this property. She also commented on the trash and asked where the trash will be going and if there is going to be a trash can for each unit. She also commented that the garages will most likely be used for additional housing and said that people do need housing but, in an area where there is plenty of space for people to move around and where kids can play. Mr. Canon Sandora commented that the acreage came about on the future land use according to the Immokalee Area Master Plan which allows a Medium Residential Sub District which allows for a base density. Ms. Sylvia Ocanas further commented on how the property is being used right now and said that there are kids playing around in that empty lot and said there is no supervision out on this property. They will have to encounter more of this with 27 units. Mr. Jacinto Cervantes lives off of Roberts Ave. He commented on the concept of this development and said the units will all be 2-story buildings and will have windows facing towards the neighbors. He asked what they plan to do to keep others from viewing other neighbors and making sure there is privacy for others. Mr. Bill Glass commented that the zoning allows the ability of 35 feet, but they are below that. He commented that more landscaping could help with this matter. Mr. Jacinto Cervantes asked if a privacy wall could be built since landscaping such as trees or bushes could get into others property and maintenance would be needed. Mr. Bill Glass followed up and commented that even with a privacy wall, the second floor still has view of the area surrounding them. Mr. Glass commented that landscaping will probably be the best way to help with others getting that privacy, however, they have not addressed this yet in their plan. Mr. Jacinto Cervantes commented that he is against this, and said it’s not a great idea. He further commented on Mr. James Sainvilus other property. Ms. Eveyln Bahena lives on Forrester Ave. She commented on an incident that occurred during Hurricane Milton. She said Mr. James Sainvilus tree fell on top of her roof; She and her husband went to speak with Mr. James Sainvilus about the incident; however, she was told by Mr. Sainvilus’ son that it was not Mr. Sainvilus responsibility to remove the tree. Ms. Bahena husband had to pay to remove the tree. She provided this example to show the responsibility of Mr. Sainvilus and commented on who will take care of this property with all the units. She further commented that these units will be an inconvenience, and it will affect all the residents nearby especially with traffic, privacy, and the children who play in the area. Page 1756 of 2001 Enclosure 1 9 Mr. Mike Facundo commented that it may be that the developer and all who are working on this development consider making an access point off of Roberts Ave. Ms. Bernardo Barnhart agreed with Mr. Mike Facundo and also commented on the garages. He has seen where many use the garages as a living space and said it would be helpful to have some type of communication with those who reside in the development on the amount of people who are able to live in the home. Ms. Lupita Vazquez Reyes commented on the importance of management to occur in developments like this. At the FRA Conference, she and other board and staff members attended this year, she learned that many people who live in urban sprawl areas in Florida are accustomed to having their own space and she understand it a change to the community. She further commented on the concerns of the community with limited housing and empty lots being owned by people who are not doing anything with the property. She elaborated on the importance of having a good relationship with the community members and believes that Mr. James Sainvilus should have been present at this meeting to address the concerns made by the neighbors near this property. Mr. Jimmy Nieves asked Mr. Canon Sandora and Mr. Bill Glass, if they have an idea as to how much trash will be accumulated or if they will be using a trash compactor. He also asked if a garbage truck will be able to access in and out of this property. Mr. Canon Sandora commented on this and expressed that progress is needed on how the disposal of trash will be. As for the access of a garbage truck, there will be accessibility since they have to follow the Collier County code. Ms. Andrea Halman said that no one is able to control how this land will be used. She commented that others may view Mr. James Sainvilus differently than his neighbors. Mr. Mark Lemke commented that Mr. Canon Sandora and Bill Glass should discuss all that was discussed at this meeting and what is set to be discussed at the Neighborhood Information Meeting to Mr. James Sainvilus. Ms. Andrea Halman reiterated the Mr. James Sainvilus is allowed to do what he likes on his property, and said she takes pride in the fact that he is trying to something really well for the community. Ms. Sarah Harrington introduced herself to the members of the public. She commented that as long as the property owner follows the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan, one may do what they wish with their property. She noted that it’s important to take information in meetings like this and relay it to the property owner to incorporate the best development possible in the neighborhood. She commented on the density and the structure that has been presented. She asked both Mr. Canon Sandora and Mr. Bill Glass on the current progress. Page 1757 of 2001 Enclosure 1 10 Mr. Bill Glass commented that they are in the soft schematics at this point. He further commented that discussions will be done with Mr. James Sainvilus on a connection to Roberts Ave. He also commented that an HOA structure would be beneficial and a trash compactor. Ms. Patricia Anne Goodnight commented on the development and confirmed on the concept of the single-family home with room for another close family member and having this development be for families to buy. Mr. Mike Facundo commented that they could have a design session with the community members to see other solutions they can come up with moving forward. He also commented that everyone has to keep an open mind, especially with trying to welcome development because we all need the tax base for the community. Mr. Canon Sandora commented that a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held, and this could help them understand those who live around the property and hear their suggestions. Ms. Sarah Harrington provided information on the occurrence of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Ms. Christie Betancourt commented on the Neighborhood Information Meeting for the Sainvilus development. Mr. Canon Sandora said that Mr. James Sainvilus will try to attend the Neighborhood Information Meeting online. Mr. Jacinto Cervantes asked if there would be any other meetings for this development. Mr. Canon Sandora followed up and said there will be other public hearings. Mr. Mark Lemke applauded the public who attended the meeting to voice out their concerns on this development. He commented that the board and staff like to see others show up when there is concern and wishes that others join as well when they have concerns. He asked that they continue to work together so that there is progress for all. Mr. Canon Sandora commented that there is a Teams link for those who are interested in attending online. 2. 2050 LRTP (Long Range Transportation Plan) Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Anne McLaughlin, Executive Director (Enclosure 11) (Time Certain 10:00 a.m.) Ms. Dusty Hansen introduced herself. She is a planner with the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), who is presenting on behalf of the Collier MPO Executive Director, who is sick. Page 1758 of 2001 Enclosure 1 11 Ms. Dusty Hansen thanked the CRA Board for placing them into the Agenda and allowing them to present. The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is working on the Long Range Transportation Plan, which looks at the anticipated transportation need through 2050. Jacobs Engineering, who is the consultant for the plan, will provide a presentation on the status and overview of the plan. Ms. Sonal Dodia, who is representing Jacobs Engineering, introduced herself. Ms. Colleen Ross introduced herself as well. She is the with Jabos Engineering and is the Project Manager for the Long-Range Transportation Plan update. Ms. Sonal Dodia presented the Agenda for the presentation. The LRTP overview, schedule, planning emphasis area and factors, vision and goals, roadway needs, cost feasible plan, Immokalee roadway needs, Immokalee resilience needs, and next steps are discussed. Ms. Sonal Dodia provided information on the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and said it is updated every 5 years and it’s a master plan for the MPO. The last update was for the 2045 LRTP and it was adopted in December 2020. The LRTP is required to receive federal transportation funds. The LRTP is a guiding document for the future improvements to the County transportation network and it covers a broad range of issues including environmental impacts, economic development, mobility, safety, security and quality of life. The LRTP Schedule • March 2024: Project kick off • 2024: Establish Goals & Objective and Financial Resources • 2024: System Needs. MPO staff are currently in this process of developing the needs. They would like to receive input from the boards on this, however, they would like to introduce the vision and goals, all planning emphasis, factors, and sources they used to develop the plan. One of the major factors that contributed to the development of the LRTP vision and goals was the federal planning emphasis areas that were outline in the Infrastructure Investments and Jobs Act (IIJA). This law provides federal funding for highway safety programs, transit program, and other transportation programs. Under the IIJA, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHA) issued the 2021 planning emphasis areas that are required for long range transportation planning. The Planning Emphases Areas include transportation resilience, equity and justice 40, meaningful public involvement, infrastructure connectivity, complete streets, data sharing principles, and planning and environment linkages. MPO Staff considered all areas when they developed the vision, goals and objective for the LRTP update. Additionally, FDOT also periodically issue their own planning emphasis areas to encourage transportation planning agencies to give priority to particular issues when developing their planning programs. Page 1759 of 2001 Enclosure 1 12 The FDOT planning emphasis area include Safety, Equity, Emerging Mobility and Resilience. The FDOT planning emphasis area were also considered for the vision, goals and objectives. The LRTP is also legally required to consider projects, strategies and services that will address the 10 Federal Planning Factors. 1. Economic Vitality 2. Safety 3. Security 4. Accessibility and Mobility 5. Environmental Quality 6. Multimodal Connectivity 7. System Efficiency 8. System Preservation 9. Resiliency & Reliability 10. Travel and Tourism Many of the factors overlap with the Federal and State planning emphasis areas and were also considered when the vision, goals, and objectives were developed. 2050 LRTP Vision: The Collier MPO 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan envisions the development of an integrated, equitable, multimodal transportation system to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of people and goods while addressing current and future transportation demand, environmental sustainability, resilience, and community character.” Ms. Sonal Dodia commented that the LRTP is a multimodal plan that incorporates the needs and cost feasible projects through the MPO’s other plans, which are incorporated by reference. The other plans include the Management Process, Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, Safety Action Plan and Transit Development Plan. The LRTP goals and objective were developed to reflect the roadway needs specifically for Collier County. The large component of the LRTP update is to project the roadway network needs by the year 2050. This involves coordination with FDOT’s District One Regional Planning Model. The first step for staff to develop the roadway needs is to understand what changes in the roadway network have taken place since the last LRTP update as well as the projected socioeconomic data distribution by the year 2050. To understand the changes, staff developed the 2028 Existing + Committed Network. This network includes existing projects which are new roadways or widened roadways that were constructed and open to the public by 2019 and the committed projects that will be in construction by 2028. The socioeconomic data for 2050 was developed and included factors such as population housing, employment, and school enrollment. A growth model was used to predict where growth in the County is likely to occur by 2050. FDOT used the MPO’s 2028 Existing + Committed Network and 2050 Socioeconomic data from the MPO’s and TPO’s within the district. The results are referred to as a deficiency analysis. Page 1760 of 2001 Enclosure 1 13 The deficiency analysis projects where significant congestion problems may occur by the year 2050. The deficiency analysis was used to develop the future roadway needs in Collier County. Ms. Sonal Dodia commented that staff would like to hear from Immokalee community members on the needs that have occurred since the last LRTP update. FDOT allows each MPO to model five alternative networks to test potential networks that could resolve deficiencies. The first alternative network was to find deficiencies or needs for Collier. Jacbos Engineering staff and Collier MPO staff have received the draft results of the alternative, one from FDOT which are being vetted. Ms. Sonia Dodia commented that they are now preparing alternative 2, which is being coordinated with the Lee County MPO. This alternative will examine the benefits of adding new potential reliever roadways that could improve connectivity between Lee and Collier County. Alternative 3 and 4 will build off the 1st and 2nd alternatives and help determine the future cost feasible plan. These alternatives are financial constraint and include cost associated with design, right of way construction and mitigation of environmental impacts. Jacob Engineering will be coordinating with Collier County Transportation Management, Lee County MPO and other stakeholder like the CRA and MSTU Board. Alternative 5 will be a transit run where staff will be provided an idea of where transit is used and needed and the best use of transit dollars. Ms. Sonal Dodia presented the 2050 Potential Roadways Needs within the Immokalee CRA and MSTU. A summarized table was presented to show the current status of roadway projects that were identified in the 2045 update. The first two projects on State Road 29 are in the 2020 existing and committed network. The following two projects are funded or partially funded in the 2045 plan. The last State Road 29 project in the potential roadway needs table is a new need that was identified in this update. The remaining projects are local projects that were identified as either fully funded, partially funded or a need in the 2045 plan. They were also identified as needs for the 2050 update. Staff would like to receive the boards input on this list. Ms. Sonal Dodia also commented on another important topic that needs to be considered when developing the LRTP and that is resilience. The resilience is a federal planning emphasis area under both the IIJA and FDOT. Newer requirements have emphasized a greater need for resilience in Collier network since Collier County is susceptible to storm surge and flooding as well as other water related hazards. The next phase of the LRTP includes continuing stakeholder coordination, obtaining input on roadway needs, and developing travel model alternatives to help inform on the cost feasible projects. Ms. Sonal Dodia asked if anyone had any input to what was presented. Mr. John Dunnuck asked if they had any plans to look at existing cross section to bring them up to the standard that they should be. He commented that coming into Immokalee Road, the community is dealing with some of the improvements on First Street that deal with constrained Right of Way. Page 1761 of 2001 Enclosure 1 14 He further asked if there are any plans to acquire the necessary Right of Way to bring it up to a full standard for a 4-lane cross section. Ms. Colleen Ross asked for further clarification on the road. Mr. John Dunnuck further commented that there is a project that staff is working on to do sidewalk improvements, but they are dealing with holes in the middle of the sidewalks due to an expansion of 4 lanes and it was expanded within the existing Right-of-Way. Ms. Colleen Ross said that this would probably be part of the Bike Pedestrian Master Plan that will then be incorporated into this plan. She further commented that she is unaware if this project is in the plan, but they will find out and add it in the needs list. Ms. Collen Ross provided information on the roadway needs and said the needs are modeled with FDOT District One D1 Regional Planning Model. This model does not get into the specifics and can only really recognize roadway expansion, new relievers, and extensions of a road. Ms. Collen Ross asked if there are just sidewalks on 1st Street or if there are any bike lanes. Mr. John Dunnuck commented that there are no bike lanes on First Street, just sidewalks. There are light poles in the sidewalk as well. Ms. Colleen Ross commented that they will have to discuss this and see if this is in as a need and note it as an issue. She noted that the sidewalks on First Street might not be up to standards. Ms. Dusty Hansen commented that she could provide Mr. Dunnuck comment to the Executive Director, Ms. Anne McLaughlin, and Project Manager for the Bike Master Plan, which is currently underway. Mr. Mike Facundo commented on the Westclox Street Extension and asked for clarification if this will be a need in 2050. Ms. Collene Ross commented that the extension was identified as a need in the 2050 plan. If it becomes cost feasible, then the cost feasible is broken up into funding periods. Staff are understanding what is cost feasible, how much funding they have, and in what year it could be funded from 2028 to 2050. Mr. Mike Facundo acknowledged that there is set to be a 4-lane improvement from the roundabout on SR29 down to New Market Road, however, currently when there are accidents on the SR 29 there’s no other outlet and how people have to go around. He doesn’t understand on how the priorities are done but he would like to know if they had any alternative solution and if there’s anything that can be done to move this item further along. Ms. Colleen Ross commented that she understood what he meant and commented that the Westclox Extension is a priority for the community. Page 1762 of 2001 Enclosure 1 15 Ms. Christie Betancourt commented that the Little Leaue Rd Extension and Westclox Street Extension have been in the list for a while. She noticed that they both now have the word funded and asked if specifics could be given as to when the design will become funded. Ms. Colleen Ross clarified that the Little League Road Extension in 2045 update was funded for design and Right of Way. Westclox Street Extension in the 2045 update was funded for design, right of way and construction. She commented that they have less funds this time and that the needs are similar to the previous update. The only new need that was identified is SR29/North Main Street. Ms. Ross reiterated that the input from everyone is important as far as prioritizing the funding and if they are important, then they will note that as well. The needs do not change necessarily bit the funding does. They will continue to work with the County as well on funding and other needs. Brief discussion was made on the list and how input is received by other boards. Commissioner McDaniel commented that this is the need analysis. There’s a process on the needs, then cost feasibility, and the available amount of funding. He followed up on Mr. Mike Facundo comment and said that an alternative route would be a Little League Extension North up to SR 82. With the acquisition of the Willams Farm, the County should get the road Right of Way necessary to take Little League Road down to Immokalee Road and have an alternative route in case there is blockage on SR 29. He said with the improvements that are coming in with the 4-lane should help alleviate traffic significantly. Ms. Andrea Halman commented on the other boards such as the Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), and Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) and is unaware if any other Immokalee community members are on these board to provide input. Commissioner McDaniel commented that the BPAC, TAC, and CAC are all Advisory Committees. The presentation presented is for the Immokalee community to make their needs known. The Long Range Transportation Plan is done every 5 years. Discussion was made on the need to have other representatives from Immokalee be part of Advisory Committee like the BPAC, TAC, and CAC and also provide input on the needs for Immokalee. Ms. Colleen Ross commented on the number of years for a project to get into the list. She said as long as it’s a need, it helps because if there’s funding and it fits the requirement then there’s a possibility that it could be completed. She reiterated that they have presented on what they identified as a need and would like to know if there are any other needs. Ms. Dusty Hansen commented that there is an Immokalee representative on the Citizens Advisory Committee. As for the Technical Advisory Committee, all committee members are technical staff, although she is not aware if they reside in Immokalee. Page 1763 of 2001 Enclosure 1 16 She also provided information on the LTRP and said that that the LRTP does place an emphasis on equity and the Justice 40 initiative and making sure that transportation disadvantaged individuals in areas that need connectivity the most are focused on. Ms. Lupita Vazquez Reyes asked if any of the input received will be affected by Federal change and Federal administration on how funding occurs. Commissioner McDaniel commented that administration after administration have emphasized on multimodal transportation. Ms. Colleen Ross commented that IIJA has a few more years to be in place. As each administration comes up, the administration will come up with their own funding mechanism for transportation. Ms. Lupita Vazquez Reyes concern included on whether or not rural areas would become deprioritized. Commissioner McDaniel commented that this will not be happening for rural areas. There are many movements that support economically deprived rural communities. Through his tenure, the priorities listed have remained on the list. Ms. Christie Betancourt asked if the Little League Extensions Road to Immokalee Road will be added to the list or if it will be tackled separately. Ms. Colleen Ross commented that it would be added in the needs list. Staff will be coming back to the boards once they know how much funding they have and where they will be able to spend it on and what they can afford to do. Discussion was made on having an advocate for Immokalee on other boards. Commissioner McDaniel further commented on the blended funding source coming out of Federal, State, and Local dollars. He also commented on the priorities of Coller County and the success of tax savings for the community that has occurred. Ms. Dusty Hansen commented that there will be opportunities for public workshops for everyone to attend. Residents and Advisory Committee members will be welcomed and are encouraged to attend and provide their input. They can keep the boards updated on this. Ms. Colleen Ross reiterated that they will be reaching back out and will be getting public input on both the roadway needs and cost feasible. They are looking to start public outreach in January and will most likely post it on social media with maps that show where the needs are at. She also said they are open taking input on intersection improvements. Page 1764 of 2001 Enclosure 1 17 Mr. Mark Lemke asked on the Little League Extension South from Lake Trafford Rd to Immokalee Road. Commissioner McDaniel commented that the Little League Extension South is from a separate local funding source. He also reiterated that everyone is welcome to provide input on any intersection improvements. Ms. Colleen Ross said everyone may also email County Staff, Ms. Anne McLaughlin and Ms. Dusty Hansen, if anyone would like to provide any needs. Commissioner McDaniel commented on how long the community has to provide input before the LRTP is complete. Ms. Colleen Ross said that all who would like to provide comments have about a couple of months, they would like to receive comments by the end of January. Commissioner McDaniel suggested that an Agenda Item be made on the next few months for the CRA and MSTU to provide input on the Immokalee list for the 2050 Potential Roadway Needs. Ms. Lupita Vazquez Reyes asked if including other suggestion or needs would affect the listing and bump other needs off the list. Ms. Colleen Ross commented that from a need standpoint there will be an adding to the list, no bump offs will occur, and all become documented for when future money is available. She suggested that all needs be provided so that it assists when funding becomes available. Ms. Lupita Vazquez Reyes asked if it’s multi-funding for various different projects and if there is a certain way to know what would move up to a priority. Ms. Colleen Ross commented that some funding has strings attached to it. Ms. Ross reiterated that they will be coming back to the boards to inform other on their funding and what they believe is cost feasible. Ms. Dusty Hansen commented that the most important thing is to make sure that a need is documented because if a funding source becomes available later in the future or there’s a new funding source, it provides the ability to secure the money. Ms. Colleen Ross provided information on the Resilience Needs. She commented that FDOT have identified a couple of areas in Immokalee. SR29 and South 1st Street are on the map. She commented that if there are significant issues in the area as far as resilience like flooding, they would also like to hear input on that as well so that it’s at least documented. Ms. Christie Betancourt commented that New Market Road should be added in the resilience needs list. She provided information on the specific limits and how the TIGER Grant is addressing some areas of concerns. Ms. Colleen Ross asked if the TIGER grant information could be provided to them, so they have a better understanding on how this is being addressed. Ms. Andrea Halman commented on whether or not Zoom will ever become available for other Immokalee community members to attend other meeting as well like the BPAC. Ms. Dusty Hansen addressed this matter and said that many have noticed that having the ability to attend by Zoom has affected the in-person quorum requirement for the MPO Advisory Committees. However, there are several public workshops, and public meetings that offer virtual participation related to the plans. Page 1765 of 2001 Enclosure 1 18 She further commented that there may be a public outreach event in Immokalee, at least one for the Long Range Transportation Plan and also for the Transit Development Plan. Ms. Christie Betancourt asked on the Alternative 5 – Transit Run, and if there are any comments being taken for public transit connectivity. Ms. Colleen Ross said through the Transportation Development Plan, they are taking public comments. The alternatives help staff in exploring the different ways with a cost feasible plan in mind. Ms. Christie Betancourt commented that the transit from Lee County Transit to Collier County Transit would benefit many. Ms. Colleen Ross commented that the needs are there, but they are working through it. Ms. Dusty Hansen commented that the analysis will be presented in Immokalee in a public workshop as for the connectivity with Lee and Collier, this is something that staff anticipate being incorporated into the Transit Development Plan overall. The Long Range Transportation Plan is a higher-level view of the transit, and the Transit Development Plan goes more into the details of the needs, recommendations, and services. Ms. Dusty Hansen said she will provide the public workshop information to all so that plenty of time is given to spread the word. Commissioner McDaniel commented that the expansion of transit with Lee and Collier are being discussed within both MPOs. CRA Staff thanked County staff and Johnson Engineering staff. CRA Staff will add the needs list to the agenda in the next meeting and continue to take comments. J. Old Business. 1. Advisory Board update Staff will provide information in the January meeting. 2. Contractor Maintenance Reports i. A&M Property Maintenance Report & Schedule (Enclosure 12) CRA Staff provided Enclosure 12, which is the maintenance report and the look ahead for January. Staff commented that any pending invoices approved and processed are shown in the footnotes of the reports. Staff approved a 50% payment to A&M Property Maintenance for the tree and decorations at the Zocalo. The rest will be paid when everything is put away. Ms. Christie Betancourt commented that she does have an assignment through the County for the maintenance department to provide a listing of the A&M contract, the work FDOT and A&M does, and to also provide the 60% plans of Main Street, even though it’s on a stop work notice. Staff noticed in their walk through that the areas that need improvement on Main Street have been marked. Page 1766 of 2001 Enclosure 1 19 Ms. Lupita Vazquez Reyes asked if there has been a significant increase with A&M Property Maintenance. Ms. Christie Betancourt commented that there is a very strenuous solicitation process. Staff have a 3-year contract with 2-year renewable every 5 years. This is the third time A&M has won the bid, in the last round staff received 5 bids but A&M won the bid. Maintenance was in the lower ends of $175,000, however staff have included other work for A&M, so the cost is up to $200,000 plus more. Ms. Lupita Vazquez Reyes asked if Parks and Recreation had any budgeting to help with the Zocalo Maintenance. Ms. Chrisie Betancourt commented that there is a cost share between the CRA and MSTU for the Zocalo. Parks and Recreation Park Rangers and the Sherrif’s Department are still monitoring the area. Parks and Recreation staff have been very helpful with the event and there was a full staff helping CRA Staff during the tree lighting event. 3. Brief Staff Project update i. Immokalee Sidewalk Phase III – Eustis Ave. and W. Delaware Ave. (Enclosure 13) Staff provided a staff report so that board and members of the public have an update on this project. The solicitation process ended in September, staff had to make sure that the contractors met all the requirements and had all the paperwork. The selected contractor is M arquee Development, Inc. Staff hope to take this award to the Board of Collier County Commissioners in January, this award is still with Procurement. Staff commented that this was under the cost the staff estimated. The grant received by staff was $987,000 but the proposed cost is $1,101,179.50. Staff provided a brief step process once the award is approved. Mr. Mark Lemke asked how many linear feet of sidewalks are set to be installed. Staff commented that it’s 2,500 linear feet on each side, so overall 5,000 feet. Ms. Lupita Vazquez Reyes asked if water and sewer, and drainage are of any concern in this area. Staff commented that they are working on this project to address the concerns. Ms. Lupita Vazquez Reyes asked if the Immokalee Water and Sewer have the resources or infrastructure to help address this matter as well. Staff commented that the Immokalee Water and Sewer District have seen the plans and provided comments on most conflicts, however, there are issues at times once work is being done. ii. First Street Corridor Safety Project update Staff will provide a staff report at the next meeting. Staff are working to phase this project. A Grant Agreement was presented to the Board of Collier County Commissioners and staff will have an Amendment to the second Agreement for the construction. The staff report at the next meeting will give an update on the progress for this project. Page 1767 of 2001 Enclosure 1 20 iii. Land Development Code (LDC) update Staff provided an update. A presentation will be given at the next meeting. The CRA and MSTU Board will be meeting jointly to get an update on added language for a Community Facility (CF) mobile food truck vehicles to be allowed on Community Facility zone areas. The Executive Director, Mr. John Dunnuck, asked that this be presented to the boards. K. New Business. No new business. L. Citizen Comments Ms. Christie Betancourt commented that the CRA, Immokalee Library and the Shelter for Abused Woman and Children will be presenting at the Interagency Meeting, all are invited to attend. The meeting is today at 11:30 a.m. in this room. Commissioner McDaniel provided information on the Private Emergency Repair Roads. The Board of Collier County Commissioners approved an amendment to Ordinance 2023-71 to remove roadways that are no longer unpaved, add unpaved private roadways and establish an opt out provision. He commented that in order to do spend taxpayer money on private land, a state of emergency must be declared. He hopes that in the second BCC meeting in January, they will be able to issue the declaration of emergency. Commissioner McDaniel also addressed that when one decides to live on a private road, it their responsibility to fix their own. Since this is the first time something like this is done in Florida, Commissioner McDaniel hopes that this item continues to progress. M. Next Meeting Date The CRA Board and MSTU Board will be meeting jointly on Wednesday, January 15, 2025, at 8:30 A.M. at CareerSource SWFL. N. Adjournment Meeting adjourned at 11:04 A.M. * Zoom Meeting chat is attached to the minutes for the record. Page 1768 of 2001 CANON SANDORACIVIL ENGINEERING, INC.NO. DESCRIPTION DATEPROJECT:SAINVILUSSUBDIVISIONPROJECT NO. 23-022 DATE 4/15/24 BY CGS SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALE 1"=40'ENGINEER: CANON SANDORA, PESTATE OF FLORIDA LICENSE # 953039201 TANGELO BLVD. FT. MYERS, FL 33967CANON@CS-CE.COM WWW.CS-CE.COM(239)-692-6738PROPERTY OWNER:SAINVILUSEXHIBIT CMASTER PLANSITE CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR SAINVILUS SUBDIVISION LOT CALCULATIONS MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS: 84' X 46.5' = 3,906 SF MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT DIMENSIONS: 44' X 30' = 1,320 SF DRIVEWAY AND WALKWAY FOOTPRINT = +/-500 SF MINIMUM OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 66% LOCATION MAP ADJACENT ZONING / FLU / USE NORTH: RSF-5 / MR / SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES SOUTH: MPUD / CMU / SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES EAST: RSF-3 / MR / SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES WEST: RSF-3 / CMU / VACANT PROJECT SITE SITE DATA TABLE PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1300 ROBERTS AVE W. 1215 FORRESTER AVE. IMMOKALEE, FL PARCEL NUMBER:00121520003 00127565509 00127564005 00127520007 SITE AREA:4.67 ACRES UNINCORPORATED AREA: COLLIER COUNTY CURRENT ZONING: RSF-3 FUTURE LAND USE: MR EXISTING LAND USE: SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE, VACANT PROPOSED LAND USE: PUDZ - SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED SITE DENSITY ALLOWABLE BASE DENSITY: 6 UNITS/AC X 4.67 AC = 28 UNITS PROPOSED UNITS: 28 UNITS NOTE THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AT THE TIME OF AGENCY PERMITTING, PLAT APPROVAL, OR DEVELOPMENT ORDER. HOWEVER, ANY SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDC) DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES. REQUESTED DEVIATION DEVIATION #1 SEEKING RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.01.N STREET SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS, WHICH REQUIRES MINIMUM LOCAL STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH OF 60 FEET. PARKING REQUIRED SPACES; 27 UNITS X 2 SPACES/UNIT = 54 SPACES PROPOSED SPACES: 1 CAR GARAGE + 1 CAR DRIVEWAY 27 UNITS X 2 SPACES/UNIT = 54 SPACES DRY DETENTION AREA 0.93 AC 1 2 3 4 56 11 13 40' ROW46.5' 84' 46.5' 89.5' 84' 46.5' 89.5' 40' ROW LAKE TRAFFORD RD.W. MAIN ST.IMMOKALEE DR. ROBERTS AVE. W. 46.5' 78910 12 14 15 16 17 54' 55.5' 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 54' SIDEWALK SIDEWALK20' LAND USE CALCULATION SINGLE-FAMILY HOME LOTS: 3.21 AC RIGHT-OF-WAY: 0.53 AC DRY DETENTION: 0.93 AC 52.5' LOT BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT: 20' REAR: 15' UNATTACHED SIDE: 7.5' SIDES ADJACENT TO ROW: 15' 10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15' TYPE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15' TYPE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER 46.5' 89.5' 252627 105.5'56.5' 112' 1 Joint CRA & MSTU Advisory Board Meeting - December 11, 2024 Agenda Item: I.1 Sainvilus Subdivision - Canon Sandora, PE Enclosure 1 Page 1769 of 2001 123456789101413121115 161718192021222324252627REF.DWWDWH LANAI9'-4" CLGKITCHENLOWER MASTER2 CAR GARAGELIVINGPORCHENTRY9'-4" CLG9'-4" CLG2 CAR GARAGELIVING9'-4" CLGENTRYPORCHLOWER MASTER9'-4" CLGLANAI9'-4" CLGKITCHENDECKFAMILY ROOMMASTER BEDROOMM. WICM. BATHBEDROOM #3DECKBEDROOM #4DECKDECKScaleProject numberDateDrawn byChecked byWILLIAM K . GLASS#AR 929260SEAL:THE DRAWING AND DESIGN WITHINTHIS HARDCOPY OR DIGITAL FILE ISTHE PROPERTY AND CREATION OFG2 ARCHITECTURE INC. AND SHALLNOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE ORIN PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSEDWRITTEN CONSENT OFG2 ARCHITECTURE INC. © 2024As IndicatedA1Site Plan -Floor Plans-12-11-2024MBRWGNo. Description Date3525 BONITA BEACH RD. #110BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134OFFICE : 239-319-0105CELL : 239-877-2500w:GLASS˫GBAIL.COBôôô.©2‚ؐ­¯Â.ÈÁProject: Sainvilus SubdivisionSITE PLANFIRST FLOOR PLANSECOND FLOOR PLANScale : 1" = 40'Scale : 1/16" = 1' - 0"Scale : 1/16" = 1' - 0"2Enclosure 1Page 1770 of 2001 ScaleProject numberDateDrawn byChecked byWILLIAM K . GLASS#AR 929260SEAL:THE DRAWING AND DESIGN WITHINTHIS HARDCOPY OR DIGITAL FILE ISTHE PROPERTY AND CREATION OFG2 ARCHITECTURE INC. AND SHALLNOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE ORIN PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSEDWRITTEN CONSENT OFG2 ARCHITECTURE INC. © 20241/8" =1' 0"A2Elevations-12-11-2024MBRWGNo.Description Date3525 BONITA BEACH RD. #110BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134OFFICE : 239-319-0105CELL : 239-877-2500w:GLASS˫GBAIL.COBôôô.©2‚ؐ­¯Â.ÈÁProject: Sainvilus Subdivision FRONT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONSIDE ELEVATION3Enclosure 1Page 1771 of 2001 ScaleProject numberDateDrawn byChecked byWILLIAM K . GLASS#AR 929260SEAL:THE DRAWING AND DESIGN WITHINTHIS HARDCOPY OR DIGITAL FILE ISTHE PROPERTY AND CREATION OFG2 ARCHITECTURE INC. AND SHALLNOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE ORIN PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSEDWRITTEN CONSENT OFG2 ARCHITECTURE INC. © 20241/8" =1' 0"A2Elevations-12-11-2024MBRWGNo.Description Date3525 BONITA BEACH RD. #110BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134OFFICE : 239-319-0105CELL : 239-877-2500w:GLASS˫GBAIL.COBôôô.©2‚ؐ­¯Â.ÈÁProject: Sainvilus Subdivision FRONT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONSIDE ELEVATION4Enclosure 1Page 1772 of 2001 Zoom Chat December 11, 2024 Joint CRA & MSTU Hybrid Public Meeting  01:42:55 Lorraine Lantz: I have to leave temporarily but wil be back on Page 1773 of 2001 Page 1774 of 2001