Loading...
MPO Agenda 02/14/2025COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization COLLIER Metropolitan Planning Organization AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 February 14, 2025 9:30 AM Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr., Chair Commissioner Dan Kowal, Vice -Chair Commissioner Chris Hall Commissioner Rick LoCastro Commissioner Burt L. Saunders Council Member Berne Barton Council Member Linda Penniman Council Member Bonita Schwan Council Member Tony Pernas This meeting of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is open to the public and citizen input is encouraged. Any person wishing to speak on any scheduled item may do so upon recognition of the Chairperson. Any person desiring to have an item placed on the agenda shall make a request in writing with a description and summary of the item, to the MPO Director or MPO Chairman 14 days prior to the date of the next scheduled meeting of the MPO. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person requiring special accommodations to participate in this meeting should contact the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization 72 hours prior to the meeting by calling (239) 252-5814. The MPO's planning process is conducted in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Related Statutes. Any person or beneficiary who believes that within the MPO's planning process they have been discriminated against because or race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, disability, or familial status may file a complaint with the Collier MPO Title VI Coordinator Ms. Suzanne Miceli (239) 252- 5814 or by email at: Suzanne.Miceli(acolliercountyfl. og_v, or in writing to the Collier MPO, attention: Ms. Miceli, at 2885 South Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104. Page 1 of 184 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Elect Chair and Vice -Chair for 2025 4.A. Elect MPO Board Chair and Vice -Chair for 2025 (2025-538) 5. Approval of the Agenda, Previous Minutes, and Consent Items S.A. December 13, 2024 MPO Minutes (2025-511) S.B. Approve Administrative Change Order 1 for Alfred Benesch & Company for the Zero Emission Fleet Transition Plan (2025-517) S.C. Recommendation to Approve a Sixth Amendment to the Existing Executive Director's Employment Agreement Extending the Term of Employment for One Year. (2025-518) 6. Public Comments for Items not on the Agenda 7. Agency Updates 7.A. FDOT 73. MPO 8. Committee Chair Reports 8.A. Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report (2025-519) 8.B. Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report (2025-521) 8.C. Congestion Management Committee Chair Report (2025-522) 9. Regular Board Action (Roll Call Required) 9.A. Approve an Amendment to the FY 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program for the Addition of a Transit Project for Capital for Paratransit (2025-523) 10. Regular Board Action (No Roll Call) 10.A. Elect Representatives to Serve on the Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council Board for 2025 (2025-524) 10.B. Adopt Florida Department of Transportation Target Zero Safety Performance Targets for Calendar Year 2025 (2025-525) 10.C. Approve a Reappointment to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (2025-526) 10.D. Approve a New Appointment to the Citizens Advisory Committee (2025-527) 10.E. Review and Approve Scope of Services for Joint Lee/Collier Regional Congestion Page 2 of 184 Management Process (2025-529) 11. Presentations (May Require Board Action) 11.A. Safe Streets and Roads for All - Comprehensive Safety Action Plan Update and Presentation on Draft Existing Conditions and Safety Analysis Memorandum (2025-531) 11.B. FDOT Presentation on Old 41 Project Development & Environment Study (2025-532) 11.C. Report on Status of Lee County and Collier MPO Consolidation Feasibility Study (2025- 533) 12. Distribution Items 12.A. Administrative Modification to the FY2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program - Add funds for Livingston/FPL Trail (2025-534) 12.B. Letter of Support for Acquisition of Bonita -Estero Rail Trail (BERT) SUN Trail Application (2025-535) 12.C. Letter of Support for Miccosukee Tribe's Grant Application for the Snake Road Safety Improvement Project (2025-536) 12.D. Updated 2025 MPO Meeting Calendar (2025-537) 13. Member Comments 14. Next Meeting Date W.A. Next Meeting Date: March 14, 2025 1 Board of County Commissioners Chambers, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 (2025-542) 15. Adjourn Page 3 of 184 2/14/2025 Item # 4.A ID# 2025-538 Executive Summary Elect MPO Board Chair and Vice -Chair for 2025 OBJECTIVE: For the Board to elect a Chair and Vice -Chair for calendar year 2025. CONSIDERATIONS: The MPO Bylaws (Attachment 1) provide that the Board shall elect a Chair and Vice -Chair at the first regularly scheduled meeting of each calendar year and that the officers shall be voting members of the MPO. Any Board member may nominate or be nominated as Chair/Vice-Chair. Elections shall be decided by majority vote. The Chair and Vice -Chair shall serve a one-year term or until a successor is elected. Commissioner William McDaniel Jr. is the current Chair; Commissioner Dan Kowal is the current Vice -Chair. FISCAL IMPACT: GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: N/A RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board elect a Chair and Vice -Chair for calendar year 2025. PREPARED BY: Dusty Hansen, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: MPO Bylaws (2024) History of MPO ChairNice-Chair - 2010-2024 Page 4 of 184 THE BYLAWS OF COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) Section 1 Description of Organization 1.01 The Agency 1.02 Composition and Operation of MPO 1.03 Committees 1.04 General Information on the MPO 1.05 Public Access to Agency Meetings and Workshops 1.06 Rights of Review Section 2 Agenda and Scheduling --Meeting and Workshops 2.01 Notice of Meetings and Workshops 2.02 Agenda 2.03 Emergency Meetings and Workshops Section 3 Amendments to Bylaws Section 1 DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION 1.01 THE AGENCY The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization, hereinafter referred to as the MPO, is created pursuant to Florida Statute 339.175 and operates under an Interlocal Agreement, as amended and restated dated February 26, 2015, authorized under Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes. The parties to the interlocal agreement are Collier County, the City of Naples, the City of Marco Island, the City of Everglades City and the Florida Department of Transportation. Creation of the MPO is for the purpose of implementing Title 23, United States Code, Section 134, and Title 49, United States Code, Sections 1602, 1603, and 1604, and Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 450, and Chapter 339.175, Florida Statutes. The MPO is created to work in cooperation with the Florida Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration. 1.02 COMPOSITION AND OPERATION OF THE MPO The composition and operation of the MPO shall be as provided in the aforesaid IC�GJ Page 5 of 184 Interlocal Agreement; the officers of the MPO and their duties, and these rules may be amended as provided by said Agreement. A. Officers — The MPO shall elect a Chairman and a Vice Chairman of the MPO at its first meeting of the calendar year. The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve for a period of one (1) year or until a successor is elected. The Chairman and Vice -Chairman shall be voting members of the MPO. B. Chairman — The Chairman of the MPO shall call and preside at all meetings of the MPO. The Vice Chairman shall serve as Chairman in the absence of the Chairman. C. Agency Clerk — The staff of the MPO shall maintain the minutes and other records of the MPO. The minutes shall accurately reflect the proceedings of the MPO. D. Quorum --- A majority of the voting members of the MPO must be present for the MPO to conduct business. E. Rules of Order — Except as otherwise provided in these Bylaws, Roberts Rules of Order, as revised, shall be followed as to any parliamentary procedures at all meetings. F. Reconsideration of Matters — Except for MPO approved contracts, any matter which has been voted upon by the MPO may be reconsidered as follows: (1) By a motion to reconsider made by a member who voted with the majority if such motion is made prior to the adjournment of the meeting at which the matter was voted upon. If there were no public speakers on the item, or if all of the public speakers for the item are still present in the boardroom following a successful motion to reconsider, the MPO may elect to rehear the matter during that meeting, or direct the MPO Executive Director to place the item on the agenda for a future meeting. In the event that there were public speakers for the item, and not all of the public speakers are still present in the boardroom following a successful motion to reconsider, the MPO Executive Director shall be directed to place the item on the agenda for a future meeting. (2) By a motion to reconsider made by a member who voted with the majority if such motion is made at a regular meeting following the meeting at which the matter was voted upon, but only in accordance with the following: 2 CAO Page 6 of 184 (i) Where a member who voted with the majority wishes the Board to reconsider a matter after the adjournment of the meeting at which it was voted on, the member shall deliver to the MPO Executive Director a written memorandum stating that the member intends to introduce a motion to reconsider. The memorandum shall state the date of the regular meeting at which the member intends to introduce such motion, and shall be delivered to the MPO Executive Director at least six days prior to such meeting. The purpose of this requirement is to allow staff to advise the Board of the legal or other ramifications of reconsideration. (ii) No motion to reconsider shall be made any later than the second regular MPO meeting following the MPO Board's vote on the matter sought to be reconsidered; with the exception of where the basis for such request for reconsideration is found upon MPO's staff's presentation of newly discovered and previously unknown facts which would have been material to the MPO's consideration at the time the item was originally considered but were not known earlier despite the due diligence of MPO staff. (iii) Upon adoption of a motion to reconsider, the MPO Executive Director shall place the item on an agenda not later than the second regular MPO meeting following the meeting at which the motion for reconsideration was adopted. (iv) All parties who participated by speaking, submitting registration forms or written materials at the original meeting the item was addressed by the MPO, shall be notified by the MPO Executive Director of the date of reconsideration. (v) MPO approved contracts may only be reconsidered by motion made prior to the adjournment of the meeting at which the matter was voted upon notwithstanding the discovery of subsequent newly discovered facts. For purposes of this subsection, a contract is defined as an agreement that is legally binding and enforceable in a court of law. 1.03 COMMITTEES There are hereby created five (5) standing committees, which shall be advisory committees to the governing board of the MPO. These advisory committees are the Technical Advisory Committee, Citizens Advisory Committee, the Bicycle 3 (r-AO Page 7 of 184 and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, the Congestion Management Committee and the Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged which shall have the following composition and duties: A. The Technical Advisory Committee — the responsibility of the Technical Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the TAC, shall be to serve the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters regarding all modes of travel, including promoting coordination among agencies, members, and transportation planning and programming; reviewing technical sufficiency, accuracy and completeness of appropriate studies; making priority recommendations for the transportation plan and program implementation, and providing technical analyses on other transportation planning issues. The TAC shall be composed of thirteen (13) voting members and one (1) non -voting member appointed by the division, department or agency that they represent. TAC voting members may designate an alternate to replace them in their absence. B. Citizens Advisory Committee — the responsibility of the Citizen Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the CAC, is to advise the MPO reviewing, reacting to, and providing comment on transportation planning issues and needs regarding all modes of travel from the citizens' perspectives. The CAC shall consist of voting members appointed by the MPO. Membership shall be composed of thirteen (13) citizens residing or whose principal place of business is located in the following areas: City of Naples (2), Collier County Unincorporated Area (5), coinciding with the established Collier County Commission Districts, City of Marco Island (1), City of Everglades City (1), including the area encompassing Chokoloskee and Plantation Island, and; Four (4) citizens at large, including a minimum of one (1) citizen representing the disabled or an advocate for the disabled community, one (1) minority citizen, and two (2) appointed from Collier County to ensure adequate representation from all geographic areas of the county, and to include groups having civic, community and economic interests. C. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee — The responsibility of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the BPAC, is to provide citizen input into the deliberation of bicycle- and 4 CAO R Page 8 of 184 pedestrian -related issues within the community, to advise the MPO on developing a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP) that is responsive to the needs of the community, to recommend policies and advise the MPO Board of opportunities that will improve the walking and bicycling environment, recommend priorities for bicycle and pedestrian projects and program implementation, and contribute to the BPMP's vision and recommendations regarding the development of the bicycle and pedestrian network. Membership shall be composed of twelve (12) at -large voting members representing a wide cross-section of Collier County residents and neighborhoods, bicycle and pedestrian safety professionals, Safe Routes to Schools organizations, transit riders, local bicycle and pedestrian advocacy groups, organizations that encourage active transportation from a community health perspective, and advocates for persons with disabilities, and other transportation disadvantaged populations. D. The Congestion Management Committee — the responsibility of the Congestion Management Committee, hereinafter referred to as the CMC, shall be to serve the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters relating to the update of the MPO's Congestion Management Process (CMP) and the coordination of the CMP with regional Congestion Management System and Intelligent Transportation System architecture. The CMC shall be composed of ten (10) voting members appointed by the division, department or agency that they represent. CMC voting and non -voting members may designate an alternate to replace them in their absence. E. The Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged — the responsibility of the Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged, hereinafter referred to as the LCB, shall be to assist the MPO in identifying local service needs and providing information, advice and direction to the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) on the coordination of services to be provided to the transportation disadvantaged pursuant to Chapter 427.0157, Florida Statutes. In accordance with Rule 41-2.012, Florida Administration Code, all members of the LCB shall be appointed by the designated official planning agency. The designated official planning agency for Collier County is the MPO. The LCB shall be composed of sixteen (16) voting members appointed by the division, department, or agency that they represent. LCB voting members may designate an alternate to replace them in their absence. 0 Page 9 of 184 1.04 GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE MPO All public records of the MPO, TAC, CAC, BPAC, LCB and CMC Committee are open for inspection and examination at the office of the MPO, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. during regular business days. 1.05 PUBLIC ACCESS TO MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS All MPO, TAC, CAC, BPAC, LCB and CMC meetings, workshops and proceedings shall be open to the public. 1.06 RIGHTS OF REVIEW All parties to the Interlocal Agreement, as well as the FHWA and F'TA shall have the rights of technical review and comment of MPO projects. Section 2 AGENDA, SCHEDULING and MEETINGS 2.01 NOTICE OF MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS A. Except in the case of emergency meetings or workshops, the MPO shall give at least seven (7) days public notice of any meeting or workshop through the issuance of a press release to local print and broadcast media in the Naples Area. B. The press release notice of such meeting or workshop shall provide: 1. The date, time. and place of the event. 2. A brief description of the purpose of the event. 3. The address where interested parties may write to obtain a copy of the agenda. A copy of the Agenda may be obtained by writing to the Collier MPO, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Agendas may also be obtained by e-mail at collier.mi)oAcolliercouniyfl.gov or by accessing the MPO's Web site at www.colliermpo.org. 2.02 AGENDA A. At least seven (7) days prior to a meeting or workshop, the MPO staff shall prepare and make available an agenda for distribution on request by any interested person. The agenda shall list the items in the order they are to be considered; provided, however, that for good cause stated in the 6 CAS Page 10 of 184 record by the person who is designated to preside at the meeting, items may be considered out of their listed order. B. The agenda shall be specific as to the items to be considered. All matters shall be listed on the agenda. 1. Any person who desires to have an item placed on the agenda of the meeting of the MPO shall request in writing that the item be considered at the next scheduled meeting of the MPO, provided, however, that such a request must be received fourteen (14) days in advance of the scheduled meeting. Written requests for placing an item on the agenda must describe and summarize the item and shall be mailed or delivered to MPO, at the address in Section 2.01 (B) of these Bylaws. 2. Additional items not included on the meeting agenda may be considered at a meeting if the chairman or his designee feels that the item requires immediate action by the MPO. 2.03 EMERGENCY MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS A. The MPO may hold an emergency meeting or workshop notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 2.01 and 2.02 of these Bylaws, for the purpose of acting upon matters affecting the public health, safety and welfare. B. Whenever an emergency meeting or workshop is scheduled to be held, the MPO shall notify, as soon as possible prior to the meeting, at least one major newspaper of major circulation in the Naples Area stating time, date, place and purpose of the meeting or workshop. Section 3 AMENDMENTS TO BYLAWS These Bylaws may be amended by a majority vote of the voting members, provided a copy of the proposed amendment shall have been sent to all members at least seven (7) calendar days prior to it being voted on. The MPO Board has sole authority to adopt and amend the bylaws of any advisory committee. These Bylaws and any and all amendments to the Bylaws will become effective upon endorsement of the Collier MPO. These Bylaws for the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization were hereby adopted in an open session with a quorum present and voting on , 2024. ®r-plo Page 11 of 184 METROPOLA TAN`PLAIT4ING ORGANIZATION LIM Attested By: illiam L. McDani`e-rJr., MPO Chair Anne McLaughl�Pp Executive Director Approved as to form and COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY %By; L.,, L— — Scott R.Teac Deputy County Attorney CAO Page 12 of 184 Year 2010 • Chair Councilman Trotter MPO Councilwoman Sulick City of Marco Island City of Naples 2011 Councilwoman Sulick Commissioner Coletta City of Naples District 5 2012 Commissioner Coletta Councilman Saad District 5 City of Naples 2013 Councilman Saad Commissioner Fiala City of Naples District 1 2014 Councilman Saad Commissioner Fiala City of Naples District 1 2015 Councilman Saad Commissioner Nance City of Naples District 5 2016 Commissioner Taylor Councilman Batte District 4 City of Marco Island 2017 Commissioner Taylor Commissioner McDaniel District 4 District 5 2018 Commissioner McDaniel Councilwoman Penniman District 5 City of Naples 2019 Councilman Buxton Councilwoman Middelstaedt City of Naples City of Everglades City 2020 Councilwoman Middelstaedt Councilman Brechnitz City of Everglades City City of Marco Island 2021 Councilwoman Middelstaedt Councilman Perry City of Everglades City City of Naples 2022 Council Member Perry Council Member Folley City of Naples City of Marco Island 2023 Council Member Folley Commissioner Hall City of Marco Island District 2 2024 Commissioner McDaniel Commissioner Kowal District 5 District 4 Page 13 of 184 Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 December 13, 2024 1 9:30 a.m. MEETING MINUTES **HYBRID REMOTE — IN -PERSON AND VIRTUALLY VIA ZOOM 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair McDaniel called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m. 2. ROLL CALL Ms. Miceli called roll and confirmed a quorum was present in the room. Members Present (in BCC Chambers) Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr., Chair Commissioner Dan Kowal, Vice -Chair Commissioner Burt L. Saunders Commissioner Chris Hall Commissioner Rick LoCastro Council Member Bonita Schwan Council Member Tony Pernas Council Member Berne Barton Council Member Linda Penniman Members Absent None MPO Staff Dusty Hansen, Senior Planner Suzanne Miceli, Operations Support Specialist II Sean Kingston, Principal Planner FDOT L.K. Nandam, District One Secretary Wayne Gaither, Manager, District 1 Southwest Area Office Jason Heironimus, Public Information Officer Marcellus Evans, District 1 Community Liaison 1 Page 14 of 184 Others Present Scott Teach, Esq., Deputy County Attorney Trinity Scott, Department Head, Collier County Transportation Mgmt. Services Lorraine Lantz, Collier County Transportation Planning, TAC Chair Julianne Thomas, Conservancy of Southwest Florida Sonal Dodia, Jacobs Engineering Michelle Avola-Brown, Naples Pathways Coalition Zoom Participants Anne McLaughlin, MPO Executive Director Dasha Kosheleva, FDOT Julian Guiterrez 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chair McDaniel led the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA, PREVIOUS MINUTES AND CONSENT ITEMS 4.A. Approval of the Agenda and Previous Minutes 4.B. Ratify the Approval of the Executive Director's completion and submission of the NEPA Categorical Exclusion Checklist for Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant as an administrative act 4.C. Approve Amendment 5 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1V40) 4.1). Approve Amendment 4 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G2594) Council Member Pernas moved to approve the agenda, previous minutes, and consent items and Vice -Chair Kowal seconded. Passed unanimously. 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None. 6. AGENCY UPDATES 6.A. FDOT Mr. Gaither presented a video on the FDOT Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-30 Work Program. Mr. Gaither said FDOT had gone through the process of working with the MPO, Collier County, and the local municipalities to identify projects for designation in the Work Program and budget the 2 Page 15 of 184 program to be sure it is balanced. FDOT held public hearings from December 9 —13, 2024. The draft Work Program was presented for comment. FDOT would continue to work with the MPO and the County. FDOT would be working with the MPO and the County to gather feedback to be included when the draft is presented to the State Legislature, and for adoption by Governor DeSantis on July 1, 2025. Vice -Chair Kowal said he had received emails from constituents regarding road surface issues on US 41 from 5' Avenue heading as far east as Golden Gate with potholes and uneven pavement. Secretary Nandam said that US 41 was experiencing major drainage issues and the pipes that run across US 41 were failing. Last year, FDOT started the process of addressing drainage issues. One of the southbound lanes on US 41 would have to be excavated, multiple inlets would be replaced as well as other work. The project estimate was $40 million, as there were many areas all along US 41 that would need to be addressed. A consultant had been hired for the project and the design phase was in progress. FDOT would look for funding for the project in FY 2030-31 to be programmed in the next Work Program cycle, but in the meantime, maintenance repairs would be done as needed. Council Member Penniman asked about the status of raising of US 41. Secretary Nandam said the consultant would assess the possibility of the raising of the road, and the results would be provided. He said the Moving Florida Forward (MFF) projects include the widening of State Rd (SR) 29 from New Market to SR 82 project and the Immokalee loop road project were both scheduled for 2027. The 18.5 mile widening of I-75 from Golden Gate Parkway to Corkscrew Road project was originally programmed as one project at approximately $620 million, but FDOT had received feedback from industry professionals that a project that size would take approximately four to five years to complete. So, in light of an anticipated lengthy project timeline and the unknown of future costs, FDOT developed a Modified Phase Build, dividing the project into four segments for funding in FY 2027-32. The first segment is included in the draft FY 2026-30 Work Program. Spreading out costs for the I-75 widening project made funding available in the first segment of the Work Program for the Immokalee Diverging Diamond Interchange project. FDOT worked with Collier County and the MPO, and local partnership funding from the County helped move the project forward. He said the 951/Collier Blvd. Widening project was pushed out again because of funding. Local partnering could help bring the project back to life. A group discussion followed regarding various projects, including the deferral of the 951 Widening project due to funding, the steady progression of the 951 and I-75 project, project timelines, and the Immokalee loop road project, and that the full 18.5 mile widening of I-75 from Golden Gate to Corkscrew project was estimated to be completed in 2032. Page 16 of 184 Commissioner LoCastro asked for renderings of the projects. Secretary Nandam said he would locate renderings and send them. Ms. Scott expressed her gratitude to Secretary Nandam, the MPO Board, and the County Commissioners for their support in advancing the I-75/Immokalee Road Interchange project. She said she would continue to work with FDOT and the MPO to devise a strategy to advance the fully designed 951 Widening project through local funding. She noted that there were ongoing conversations between the County and FDOT regarding updating the Interlocal Agreement to continue funding after FY 2027 for the operations and maintenance of the fire station facility at Mile Marker 63, which is a very important project for Collier County. Ms. Scott said she was working with FDOT on a strategy to revise the design of MFF project, I-75 at Pine Ridge, as some necessary design elements had been overlooked. Secretary Nandam said during the legislative cycle in the year prior, there had been some modifications of the language and the current funding, which was capped at $2 million, was scheduled to end in 2027. The fire station informed FDOT that expenses were over $2 million. To sustainably source funding for the fire station, FDOT requested that the fire station develop a five-year capital plan to support necessary funding, which would be renegotiated every five years. Mr. Gaither introduced FDOT's new MPO liaison, Mr. Evans. 6.B. MPO None. 7. CHAIR REPORTS 7.A. CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) 7.A.1. Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report Report presented in writing. 7.B. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC) 7.B.1. Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report Report presented in writing. 7.C. BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC) 7.C.1. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report 4 Page 17 of 184 Report presented in writing. Vice -Chair Kowal said that a recent meeting he had with BPAC Chair, Anthony Matonti, local traffic enforcement, and County legal staff, culminated in a possible draft ordinance to regulate e-bikes. The draft was rejected by the County Sheriff legal staff. Vice -Chair Kowal encouraged all concerned to reach out to the Sheriff to inquire as to why the draft ordinance was rejected. He said that the state manages state roads, but attempting to regulate e-bikes on sidewalks is a local issue. Chair McDaniel suggested inviting Sheriff legal staff to a Board meeting to further the discussion. A group discussion followed regarding the need for e-bike regulations because of the dangerous conditions unregulated e-bike riders create by reckless riding, e.g., riding the opposite way on the road, jumping out in front of traffic, et cetera. Secretary Nandam said he is part of statewide bike-ped safety coalition, facing the same challenges regarding e-bikes. Law enforcement informed the coalition that the current definition for electric bikes does not incorporate privately owned electric bikes (only rentals). The coalition proposed a definition change to include personal e-bikes, and Secretary Nandam offered to provide the Board with the language. He suggested the Board talk to their legislative delegates about updating the definition. Vice -Chair Kowal said sidewalks fall under county jurisdiction. If an e-bike leaves the sidewalk and hits a car, the state categorizes the e-bike as pedestrian traffic. The state cannot help if the County doesn't have ordinance in place for e-bikes. A group discussion followed, regarding possible measures that might be taken to combat the e-bike issue and Vice -Chair Kowal said he would have the draft ordinance sent to everyone for reference. 7.D. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (CMC) 7.D.L Congestion Management Committee Chair Report Report presented in writing. 7.E. LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD (LCB) 7.E.1. Local Coordinating Board Chair Report Report presented in writing. 8. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (ROLL CALL REQUIRED) 8.A. Approve an Amendment to the FY 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program for the Addition of a Transit Project to Fund a Replacement Bus Page 18 of 184 Mr. Kingston said the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) requested the Collier MPO to amend its FY 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to add non -budgeted Federal Transit Authority (FTA) funds to purchase vehicles/equipment for a replacement bus over 30 feet. Vice -Chair Kowal moved to approve an Amendment to the FY 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program for the Addition of a Transit Project to Fund a Replacement Bus and Commissioner LoCastro seconded. Roll Call Vote. Commissioner McDaniel — Yes Commissioner Kowal — Yes Commissioner Hall — Yes Commissioner LoCastro — Yes Commissioner Saunders - Yes Council Member Barton — Yes Council Member Penniman — Yes Council Member Schwan - Yes Council Member Pernas — Yes Passed unanimously. 8.13. Approve an Amendment to the FY 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program — Operational and Capital Funding for Easter Seals Transit Projects Mr. Kingston said FDOT requested the Collier MPO to amend its FY 2025-2029 TIP to add funding for operating expenses for the Easter Seals transit program and capital funds for van purchase/expansion for the Easter Seals transit program so that federal funds could be authorized. A local fund match for both would come from Easter Seals. Council Member Barton moved to approve an Amendment to the FY 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program — Operational and Capital Funding for Easter Seals Transit Projects and Commissioner LoCastro seconded. Roll Call Vote. Commissioner McDaniel — Yes Commissioner Kowal — Yes Commissioner Hall — Yes Commissioner LoCastro — Yes Commissioner Saunders - Yes Council Member Barton — Yes Council Member Penniman — Yes Council Member Schwan - Yes Council Member Pernas — Yes 0 Page 19 of 184 Passed unanimously. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (NO ROLL CALL) 9.A. Approve Amendment 1 to the FY 2024/25-2025/26 Unified Planning Work Program Ms. Hansen said the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) serves as the MPO's two-year budget document and identification of the deliverables that the MPO provides. She said a revised Executive Summary had been distributed to the Board to correct an error in the second table included, which had also been corrected in the online version of the December 13, 2024 MPO Agenda Packet. FDOT had provided the MPO with an additional $13,765 in planning funds for the fiscal year and requested that the MPO amend its UPWP (and the underlying MPO agreement) to reflect the additional funds. Since the UPWP was adopted in May 2024, some consultant billings had been reconciled through the end of the last UPWP period. Changes in the Amendment include the addition of a regional element to the Congestion Management Process (CMP) with the Lee MPO in FY 2025 and a reallocation of funds between categories for MPO staff salary tasks, consultant services, and travel and professional development. A transit fare study, funded with the Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement Division (PTNE), had also been added to the scope of work for Task 6 in FY 2025. The amounts of PTNE's funding contributions for both the transit fare study and the zero emission fleet transition plan has also been updated. Council Member Schwan moved to approve an Amendment 1 to the FY 24125-25126 Unified Planning Work Program and Council Member Penniman seconded. Passed unanimously. 9.B. Approve the MPO's Amended Public Participation Plan Ms. Hansen said that the MPO's current Public Participation Plan (PPP) was updated in 2020. The MPO's Federal Certification Review process and request for documents prompted staff to initiate a clean- up amendment to update the PPP to reflect current demographics and requirements. The MPO provided a draft to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The FHWA provided comments on the updated draft, which have been incorporated. The required public comment period was met. Ms. Hansen reviewed some details of the updates that had been made (which can be viewed in the December 13, 2024 MPO Agenda Packet). Commissioner Hall moved to approve the MPO's Amended Public Participation Plan project and Council Member Penniman seconded. Passed unanimously. 9.C. Approve Proposed 2025 MPO Meeting Calendar Ms. Miceli said this was a request for the Board to approve the proposed 2025 MPO Meeting Calendar, which includes a special MPO Board meeting date request on Thursday, December 11, 2025, 7 Page 20 of 184 instead of the regularly scheduled meeting date of December 12, 2025, as the 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) must be adopted by December 11, 2025. The MPO was notified by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) that that there would be no grace period for this deadline. She requested that the Board approve the proposed 2025 MPO Meeting Calendar which includes the special MPO Board meeting date on December 11, 2025. Chair McDaniel asked if the LRTP could be adopted in November. Ms. Hansen said that a November adoption date could be attempted, but that in an abundance of caution, the MPO would also hold the December 11, 2025 date. Council Member Pernas moved to approve the 2025 MPO Meeting Schedule and Council Member Penniman seconded. Passed unanimously. 9.D. Accept the 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan Public Involvement Plan, Chapter 1 Introduction, and Chapter 3 Planning Context and Decision -Making Framework Ms. Hansen said the proposed plan and draft chapters were being presented to the Board for acceptance rather than adoption, as there would likely be modifications to the chapters as the plan continues to be developed. At the last MPO Board meeting, MPO consultant, Jacobs Engineering provided an overview of the documents in the 2050 LRTP process. FDOT provided comments which were incorporated to FDOT's satisfaction. The draft was endorsed by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) endorsed the draft with the provision that bus -rapid transit be included as a weighting criterion. Vice -Chair Kowal moved to accept the 2050 LRTP Public Involvement Plan and Chapters 1 and 3 and Council Member Penniman seconded. Passed unanimously. 9.E. Approve Three Reappointments and Appoint a New Member to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Ms. Miceli said three Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) members were requesting membership renewal and there was also a new appointment request by a BPAC member elect. Reappointments included, Patty Huff, a year-round resident of Everglades City and member of the Naples Pathways Coalition (NPC), BPAC's Vice -Chair, Michelle Sproviero, an active member of both Naples Velo and NPC, and Robert Phelan, active BPAC member who has served on various MPO committees since 2016. BPAC member elect, David Sutton, a financial advisor who served on Colorado's City of Lone Tree Planning Commission before relocating to Naples, expressed great enthusiasm for joining BPAC. Commissioner Hall moved to approve Three Reappointments and Appoint a New Member to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee and Council Member Schwan seconded. Passed unanimously. Page 21 of 184 9.F. Approve the Reappointment of a Citizens Advisory Committee Member Ms. Miceli said Mr. Neal Gelfand was serving as the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Vice - Chair and that he expressed interest in continuing to serve on CAC. Commissioner Hall had expressed his support of the reappointment of Mr. Gelfand to serve a another 3-year term as the District II representative on the CAC. Council Member Penniman moved to approve the Reappointment of a Citizens Advisory Committee Member and Commissioner Hall seconded. Passed unanimously. 9.G. Approve Annual Performance Review of MPO Executive Director Ms. Hansen said that MPO Executive Director Anne McLaughlin's contract calls for an annual evaluation consistent with a previously approved Annual Performance Evaluation Plan. Ms. Hansen thanked all of the Board members for submitting their evaluations. The Board found that Ms. McLaughlin exceeds standards in areas including sustained public outreach, program implementation, and policy and plans. Commissioner Hall moved to approve Annual Performance Review of MPO Executive Director and Vice -Chair Kowal seconded. Passed unanimously. 10. Reports and Presentations 10.A. FDOT FY 2026-2030 Draft Tentative Five -Year Work Program Ms. Hansen said that FDOT released the FY 2026-2030 Draft Tentative Work Program on November 18, 2024, which includes the additions of Moving Florida Forward (MFF) projects, I-75 from Pine Ridge to Immokalee, and from Immokalee to Bonita Beach, and the 1-75 Immokalee Diverging Diamond Interchange. Some Bike-Ped projects had been deferred and some resurfacing projects were deferred or deleted. 10.B. Collier MPO Federal Fiscal Year 2024 Annual Report Ms. Hansen said that the MPO Director prepares an Annual Report for the Board. The Annual Report provides basic information about the MPO such as the annual operating budget and Transportation Improvement Program, and tracks progress made towards achieving the MPO's adopted performance measures and targets. Ms. Hansen provided a brief presentation on the report. 11. Distribution Items 11.A. Administrative Modification to the FY2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program (County Barn Road Bike/Ped, Marco Island Collier Alternate Bike Lane, and Capital and 0 Page 22 of 184 Operating Assistance Transit projects) This item was distributed. 11.B. Administrative Modification to the FY2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program (Transit Sec. 5311 Operating Assistance Increase for FY25) This item was distributed. 12. MEMBER COMMENTS Commissioner Saunders thanked the MPO staff and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for a good year and wished everyone a Happy Holiday. Commissioner Hall wished everyone a Merry Christmas. Council Member Penniman wished everyone a Happy Holiday. Vice -Chair Kowal thanked everyone for their work and wished everyone a Happy Holiday and Merry Christmas and reminded everyone to be safe. Council Member Pernas thanked Collier County and FDOT for their great work clearing the vegetation in Everglades City after the hurricane. Council Member Schwan thanked everyone for welcoming her and she looked forward to representing the City of Marco Island on the Board and wished everyone a Merry Christmas. Council Member Barton wished everyone a Merry Christmas. Commissioner LoCastro thanked Mr. Gaither for his efficiency and attention to the needs of the County. Chair McDaniel said he recently drove 6,000 miles conducting an annual wildlife survey throughout the country and when he got to Florida highways, especially in Collier County, he saw an abundance of trash along I-75 and asked that FDOT attend to it. Commissioner LoCastro said Mr. Gaither had recently corresponded with him regarding the status and activity of the clean-up work FDOT was doing along I-75 and Commissioner LoCastro suggested Mr. Gaither send the information to the entire MPO Board. Mr. Gaither confirmed that he would send the information to the Board. Chair McDaniel wished everyone a Happy Holiday and Merry Christmas. 10 Page 23 of 184 13. NEXT MEETING DATE 13.A. February 14, 2025- 9:30 a.m. Board of County Commssioners Chambers, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 14. ADJOURN a.m. There being no further business, Chair McDaniel adjourned the meeting at approximately 10:46 Page 24 of 184 2/14/2025 Item # 5.13 ID# 2025-517 Executive Summary Approve Administrative Change Order 1 for Alfred Benesch & Company for the Zero Emission Fleet Transition Plan OBJECTIVE: To obtain MPO Board approval of administrative Change Order 1 providing Alfred Benesch & Company (Benesch) with a 35-day extension of time to complete the Collier Area Transit (CAT) Zero Emission Fleet Transition Plan (ZEP). CONSIDERATIONS: The MPO Board approved a work order for Benesch to complete the CAT ZEP at its September 13, 2024, meeting. The ZEP will evaluate the prospect of deploying zero and low emission vehicles in CAT's fleet, including feasibility, infrastructure needs, power needs, high-level cost estimates, and funding source opportunities. The ZEP also assesses the current state of technology of zero and low emission vehicles and resiliency. The ZEP will assist CAT in evaluating and potentially implementing diversification of CAT's fleet in order to be responsive to the community's needs. The ZEP is also required for CAT to be eligible for various competitive Federal Transit Administration grants. A notice to proceed to Benesch for the ZEP was issued on September 26, 2024, and the current expiration date for the project is March 25, 2025. Benesch has requested, and MPO and CAT staff has agreed to, a 35-day extension of time so that committee/Board meeting presentations on the proposed ZEP can take place, and any necessary revisions to the report resulting therefrom can be incorporated into the final report. MPO Staff has prepared Change Order 1 for a 35- day extension of time, making the new expiration date for the project April 29, 2025. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Contracting matters are not presented to committees. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve Change Order 1 granting Benesch a 35-day extension of time to complete the ZEP and authorize the Chair to sign the Change Order. PREPARED BY: Dusty May Hansen, MPO Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Change Order 1 — Benesch / CAT Zero Emission Fleet Transition Plan Page 25 of 184 curler Procurement Order Form ❑ Contract Modification f' ® Work Order Modification Contract #: 18-7432 MP Change #: Purchase Order #: 4500233169 Project #: 33743.6.2.2 [33833.9.1 Contractor/Firm Name: Alfred Benesch & Company Contract/ Project: Zero Emission Fleet Transition Plan Project Manager Name: Dusty Hansen Division Name: Collier MPO Original Contract/Work Order Amount $ 98,540.00 9/13/24, 9A Original BCC Approval Dale; Agenda Item # Current BCC Approved Amount $ 98,540.0 9113/24, 9A Last BCC Approval Date; Agenda Item # Current Contract/Work Order Amount $ 98,540.00 3/11/2026 SAP Contract Expiration Date (Master) Dollar Amount of this Change $ 0.00 0.00% Total Change from Original Amount Revised Contract/Work Order Total $ 98,540.00 0.00% Change from Current BCC Approved Amount Cumulative Changes $ 0.00 0.00% Change from Current Amount Completion Date, Description of the Task(s) Change, and Rationale for the Change Notice to Proceed 9/26l2024 Original 3125/2025 Last Approved 3/25/2025 Revised Date 4/29/2025 Date Completion Date Date (Includes this change) # of Days Added 35 Select Tasks ❑ Add new task(s) ❑ Delete task(s) ❑ Change task(s) ® Other Provide a response to the following: 1.) detailed and specific explanationtrationale of the requested change(s) to the task(s) and / or the additional days added (if requested); 2.) why this change was not included in the original contract; and, 3.) describe the Impact if this change is not processed. Attach additional information from the Design Professional and/or Contractor if needed. 1. Add 35 days to work order to allow the consultant additional time to complete committee/board meetings and outreach per Task 10, and to make any necessary revisions to the final report resulting from the meetings/outreach. The additional time is necessary to provide a complete final report. 2. During the course and development of the study, it was determined that additional time to complete committee/board meetings and outreach is necessary to provide a complete and thorough final report, and ensure the input received can be incorporated into the final report as appropriate. The additional time needed was not incorporated in the scope initially because developments arising from the course of the study had not yet occurred. 3. The consultant will not be able to complete the final report and the committee/board meetings and outreach required by the scope. In addition, changes to the report resulting from the committee/board review and outreach will not be completed if the change is not processed, and the work order will not be able to be completed. Prepared by: Date: I I CJ Acceptance of this Change Order shall constitute a modification to contract / work order identified above and will be subject to all the same terms and conditions as contained in the contract / work order indicated above, as fully as if the same were stated in this acceptance. The adjustment, if any, to the Contract shall constitute a full and final settlement of any and all claims of the Contractor / Vendor / Consultant ! Design Professional arising out oWr,,related to the chan2e3EUQrlh JWein, including claims for impact and delay costs. Accepted by: 111 (Cons ant lfre Benesch 8 Approved by: (Anne mac, au lin, C ier MPO Executive Director) r� . n• Approved by: (Brian Wells, PTNE Division Director) AhmadJa Digitally signed by AhmadJay Approved by: y Date: 2025 01,02 06:26:57-05'00' (Trinity Scott, Transportation Management Services Department Head) Bowden Stephanie Digitally signed by B°wdenStephan'e Approved by: Date: 202s.01.0214:5223-05'00' (Procurement Professional) Revised: 01/1412021 (Divisions who may require additional signatures may include on separate sheet.) Date: /Z//6/Zy Date: Date: i / 1 -,;-L/ Date: Date: PROCUREMENT USE ONLY dmin ec BCC ES Change Order/Amendment Summary CO# AMD# Description COST TIME Justification Additive (+) Deductive () Days Added New Amount 1 Add 35 days to allow consultant to complete committee/board presentations and outreach and make any necessary revisions to the final report resulting therefrom 35 215 Additional time is necessary to complete presentations to committees/boards and associated outreach, to incorporate changes to the report based on the same, and to finalize the report due to developments that have arisen during the normal course of the study. LAO Revised: 01/14/2021 (Divisions who may require additional signatures may include on separate sheet.) PROCUREMENT USE ONLY dmi Rpf BCC ES Attest: COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION By: By: Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Approv d as to form and legality: Scott R. Teach, Deputy County Attorney Collier MPO Chair Printed Name: Revised: 01/14/2021 (Divisions who may require additional signatures may include on separate sheet.) PROCUREMENT USE ONLY dmi Rp[ BCC ES Attachment to Change Order 1 - Alfred Benesch & Co. From: Dusty Hansen To: Blain, Wallv Cc: Anne McLaughlin: Alexander Showalter; Brian Wells Subject: RE: Zero Emission Transition Plan time extension Date: Wednesday, December 18, 2024 10:17:25 AM Attachments: imaae002.ono imaQe003.ona imaae004.ono imaae005.Dna Good Morning, Both the MPO and PTNE are agreeable to extending the work order to April 29, 2025. We will prepare the appropriate time extension documentation. Thank you. Respectfully, Dusty May Hansen Senior Planner Collier MPO 2885 S. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL, 34104 O: 239-252-5850 M: 239-315-1019 Dusty. Hansen aacolliercountyfl.00v 1JJrn Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Blain, Wally <WBlain@benesch.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 3:10 PM To: Dusty Hansen <Dusty.Hansen @colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Zero Emission Transition Plan time extension EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dusty — CAA Based on the current schedule for the Zero Emission Transition Plan, we've identified the need to request additional time. This request is based on the current meeting schedule of MPO advisory committees and the Board. In order to present the findings and recommendations from the study and have time to adequately address comments, we are requesting an extension of this work order (4500233169) through April 29th This time extension does not include a change in the scope of services or the fee for completing this task assignment. Please contact me with any questions or concerns regarding this request. Thank you Wally Wally Blain, AICP Senior Project Manager I Associate wblain ftenesch com direct:615-241-6739 mobile:813-344-7322 office:615-370-6079 574 Franklin Road, Suite 300, Franklin, TN 37069 benesch r in • • Help Benesch CHEER_ this holiday season The information contained in this message may be privileged, confidential, protected from disclosure or subject to copy right/patent protection. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. CND' Collier County DELEGATION OF SIGNATURE AUTHORITY AUTHORIZATION DEFINITIONS. The following terms shall be defined as follows: • "Signature Authority" -- Refers to the ability and discretion of a duly designated employee to formally accept, request, approve, or document by signature various actions pertaining to the administration of the agency. • "Permanent Signature Authority" -- Refers to the appropriate utilization of signature authority on an ongoing basis. • "Temporary Signature Authority" -- Refers to the appropriate utilization of signature authority that has been properly transferred from a permanent signatory for a period not to exceed 60 calendar days in duration. Permanent Signatory Name: Permanent Signatory Position Title: Authorized Signatory Name: Authorized Signatory Position Title: Duration of Delegated Authority: If Temporary, time -frame of delegation: Trinity Scott Department Head Jay Ahmad Division Director Temporary 12/23/24 1/3/25 Signature authorization required for the following documents/records: ❑ Purchase Order Modification Contract Amendments Purchase Requisitions ❑ Budget Amendments Receiving/Invoicing Documents Change Orders ❑ Supplemental Agreements Personnel Requisitions Payroll Records - Leave Other - Describe Below F✓ Select All - authorization applies to all listed documents/records Permanent Signatory Authorization: S cottTrinity Digitally signed 1 :43:48 05' Date: 2024.12.30 15:43:48-OS'00' CAC Page 31 of 184 2/14/2025 Item # 5.0 ID# 2025-518 Executive Summary Recommendation to Approve a Sixth Amendment to the Existing Executive Director's Employment Agreement Extending the Term of Employment for One Year. OBJECTIVE: To recommend that the Board approve a Sixth Amendment to the existing Executive Director's Employment Agreement extending the term of employment one year. CONSIDERATIONS: At the Board's February 9, 2024 meeting, it increased Director McLaughlin's annual salary and extended her Employment Agreement for a year, with the option for the parties to mutually agree to further extend the agreement for up to two additional years. The Director's Employment Agreement is scheduled to terminate on March 9, 2025. The Board voted unanimously to approve the Director's annual performance review on December 13, 2024. Director McLaughlin would like to extend her Employment Agreement for one year to terminate on March 9, 2026. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for Board approval. All employment agreements are subject to approval by the Florida Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. The proposed Sixth Amendment was provided to staff with a request that it have those agencies review the attached amendment. RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to approve the attached proposed Sixth Amendment to the existing Executive Director's Employment Agreement extending the term of her employment one year, and authorizing the Chairman to sign the attached amendment. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: N/A PREPARED BY: Scott R. Teach, Deputy County Attorney ATTACHMENTS: Sixth Amendment to Collier MPO Executive Director Employment Agreement Page 32 of 184 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO COLLIER MPO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT — EXTENSION OF TERM THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT TO COLLIER MPO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Sixth Amendment") is made and entered into this 141n day of February 2025, by and between the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (hereafter, the "MPO") and Anne M. McLaughlin, the Executive Director of the MPO (hereafter, the "Employee"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, on December 11, 2015, the Employee and the MPO entered into an Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") wherein the MPO hired the Employee to serve as its Executive Director; and WHEREAS, the Employment Agreement provides for the terms and conditions of the Employee's employment with the MPO, including but not limited to her term of employment, severance pay benefits, employee benefit package and annual performance evaluation; and WHEREAS, on December 8, 2017, the Employee and the MPO entered into a First Amendment to the Employment Agreement to extend her Employment Agreement through March 31, 2018, to allow an opportunity for the MPO to complete her annual performance evaluation and provide direction on her further employment with the MPO; and WHEREAS, on March 9, 2018, the Employee and the MPO entered into a Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement to extend her Employment Agreement through March 9, 2020; and WHEREAS, on December 13, 2019, the Employee and the MPO entered into a Third Amendment to the Employment Agreement to extend her Employment Agreement through March 9, 2022, which included an optional two-year renewal term; and WHEREAS, on December 12, 2021, the Employee and the MPO entered into a Fourth Amendment to the Employment Agreement to extend her Employment Agreement through March 9, 2024; and WHEREAS, on February 9, 2024, the Employee and the MPO entered into a Fifth Amendment to the Employment Agreement to extend her Employment Agreement for one additional year through March 9, 2025; and WHEREAS, Section 2 of the Agreement further provides that the Parties can amend the provisions of the Agreement when mutually agreed upon in writing, which includes extending the Employee's current term of employment; and CAO Page 33 of 184 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to further amend the Employment Agreement to extend the term of the Employee's employment for one more year through March 9, 2026, at her existing rate of compensation, subject to otherwise permitted cost of living or general wage adjustments allowed under the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained in this Sixth Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration exchanged between the MPO and Employee, the Parties agree as follows: 1. The above RECITALS are true and correct and are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference as if set forth fully below. 2. The termination date of the Agreement as set forth in Section 2 of the Fifth Amendment to the Collier MPO Executive Director's Employment Agreement, which is incorporated by reference herein, is hereby further revised and extended to March 9, 2026, as follows (�ethfa•• = deletions / underscoring = additions): Section 2: Term A. Employee agrees to remain in the exclusive employ of the MPO from December 13, 2019, through and until March 9, 2026 2423; and neither to accept other employment nor to become employed by any other employer until termination of employment pursuant to this Agreement, except as provided in Section 10, infra. B. Neither party has any right to renew or extend this Agreement. If the Employee desires to renew and extend this Agreement, the Employee shall place the request in writing for the MPO's consideration at a regularly scheduled MPO meeting no later than 120 days prior to the expiration of the current term of employment. If the MPO accepts the Employee's request, the term of this Agreement may be extended for a period of up to two (2) years through a mutual written amendment to this agreement executed by the MPO and the Employee. Although both parties retain the right not to extend this Agreement with or without reason or cause, it is contemplated that the MPO will base its decision on the question of whether or not to grant the extension of the term of this Agreement on (1) the Employee's performance and (2) the Employee's ability to successfully achieve goals mutually developed and agreed to by the Employee and the MPO. If the Employee decides not to request further extending the Agreement beyond the termination date provided in Section A above, the Employee will endeavor to provide notice to the MPO no later than the same 120 day timeframe that she would request to extend the Agreement. CAO Page 34 of 184 3. Except as modified by this Sixth Amendment (and as previously amended and not in conflict with this amendment), the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. If there is a conflict between the terms of this Sixth Amendment and the Agreement, the terms of this amendment shall prevail. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the MPO has caused this Sixth Amendment to be signed and executed on its behalf by its Chairman, and the Employee has signed and executed this amendment, on the month, date, and year first written above. Attest: WITNESSES: Print Name: Print Name: Approved as to form and legal' - k �L 7 ry L Scott R. Teach Deputy County Attorney COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Collier MPO Chairman EMPLOYEE Anne M. McLaughlin, Executive Director 3 CAO Page 35 of 184 Executive Summary Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report 2/14/2025 Item # 8.A ID# 2025-519 OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) related to recent committee actions and recommendations. CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. The CAC Chair may provide a verbal report providing additional information regarding recent committee activities. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive Summary for each action item and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: N/A PREPARED BY: Dusty Hansen, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: CAC Chair Report 1-27-25 Page 36 of 184 CAC Members: Elaine Middelstaedt (P); Neal Gelfand (N); Dennis DiDonna (N); Karen Homiak, Chair (P); Josh Rincon (N); Misty Phillips (P); Fred Sasser, Vice -Chair (P); Dennis Stalzer (N); Michelle Arnold (P); Vacancy -City of Naples; Vacancy -City of Marco Island; Vacancy -District 1; Vacancy — District 5. (P: present; N: not present) Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Chair Report The Collier MPO held its regularly scheduled, in -person, CAC meeting on January 27, 2025; a quorum was achieved. Agency Reports • Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) o Marcellus Evans attended on behalf of FDOT with nothing to report. • MPO Director o Anne McLaughlin indicated that there was nothing to report outside of what was included on the agenda. Committee Actions • Elected Karen Homiak as Chair and Fred Sasser as Vice -Chair for the Committee for 2025, passing unanimously. • Endorsed FDOT Target Zero Safety Performance Targets for 2025, passing unanimously. • Endorsed an Amendment to the FY 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program (Add Funds for Paratransit), passing unanimously. • Endorsed draft Scope of work for Joint Lee/Collier Regional Congestion Management Process Element, passing unanimously. • Reviewed and commented on a Lee/Collier MPO Consolidation Feasibility Study Draft Scope of work. Reports and Presentations • Received a presentation from FDOT on the Old 41 PD&E Study. • Received a report from the MPO Director on the FHWA/FTA Collier MPO TMA 2024 Certification Review Report. • Received a status report from the MPO Director on the 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan. Distribution Items • MPO Letter of Support for Acquisition of Bonita -Estero Rail Trail. • Administrative Modification #4 to the FY 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program (Add funds for Livingston/FPL Trail PD&E). The next regularly scheduled meeting will be held on February 24, 2025, at 2:00 PM. Page 37 of 184 Executive Summary Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report 2/14/2025 Item # 8.13 ID# 2025-521 OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) related to recent committee actions and recommendations. CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. The TAC Chair may provide a verbal report providing additional information regarding recent committee activities. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive Summary for each action item and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: N/A PREPARED BY: Dusty Hansen, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: TAC Chair Report 1-27-25 Page 38 of 184 TAC Members: Michael Tisch for Kathy Eastley (P); Alison Bickett, Chair (P); Omar De Leon (P); Ute Vandersluis (P); Justin Martin (N); Harry Henkel (N); Don Scott, Vice -Chair (P); Daniel Smith (N); Margaret Wuerstle (N); Dave Rivera (P); John Lambcke (N); Bryant Garrett (P); Tonia Selmeski for Bert Miller (P); Vacancy - Non -voting Member Representing a Local Environmental Agency. (P: present; N: not present) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Chair Report The Collier MPO held its regularly scheduled, in -person, TAC meeting on January 27, 2025; a quorum was achieved. Agency Reports • Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) o Marcellus Evans attended on behalf of FDOT, with nothing to report. • MPO Director o Anne McLaughlin indicated that there was nothing to report outside of what was included on the agenda. Committee Actions • Elected Alison Bickett as Chair and Don Scott as Vice -Chair for the Committee for 2025, passing unanimously. • Endorsed FDOT Target Zero Safety Performance Targets for 2025, passing unanimously. • Endorsed an Amendment to the FY 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program (Add Funds for Paratransit), passing unanimously. • Endorsed draft Scope of work for Joint Lee/Collier Regional Congestion Management Process Element, passing unanimously. • Reviewed and commented on a Lee/Collier MPO Consolidation Feasibility Study Draft Scope of work. Reports and Presentations • Received a presentation from FDOT on the Old 41 PD&E Study. • Received a report from the MPO Director on the FHWA/FTA Collier MPO TMA 2024 Certification Review Report. • Received a status report from the MPO Director on the 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan. Distribution Items • MPO Letter of Support for Acquisition of Bonita -Estero Rail Trail. • Administrative Modification #4 to the FY 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program (Add funds for Livingston/FPL Trail PD&E). The next regularly scheduled meeting will be held on February 24, 2025, at 9:30 AM. Page 39 of 184 2/14/2025 Item # 8.0 ID# 2025-522 Executive Summary Congestion Management Committee Chair Report OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Congestion Management Committee (CMC) related to recent committee actions and recommendations. CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. The CMC Chair may provide a verbal report providing additional information regarding recent committee activities. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive Summary for each action item and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: N/A PREPARED BY: Sean Kingston, AICP, PMP, Principal Planner ATTACHMENTS: CMC Chair Report 1-15-25 Page 40 of 184 CMC Members: Dan Hall, Chair (P); Christopher Ordonez (N); Justin Martin (N); Karen Homiak (P); Dayna Fendrick (N); Don Scott (P); Omar DeLeon (P); Joe Rauktys for Alison Bickett, Vice -Chair (P); John Lambcke (N); David Rivera (N). (P: present; N: not present) Congestion Management Committee Chair Report The Collier MPO held its regularly scheduled in -person Congestion Management Committee (CMC) meeting on January 15, 2025; a quorum was achieved. Agency Reports • Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) did not attend. • MPO: o Last CMC meeting saw a presentation on the existing conditions memo for the Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP) prepared by project consultant, TY Lin International, and delivered by MPO Principal Planner, Sean Kingston. An updated version will be presented to the MPO Board by the consultant on February 14'. Committee Actions • Annual CMC elections resulted in Dan Hall of Collier County Traffic Operations — Safety for Chairman and Alison Bickett of City of Naples Engineering/Planning for Vice Chairman. • Committee endorsed the Scope of Services for the Lee and Collier MPOs' Regional Congestion Management Process (CMP) Element. Committee reviewed and commented on the Lee and Collier MPO Consolidation Feasibility Study draft Scope of Services. Reports and Presentations • None. Distribution Items • MPO Board Approved 2025 Meeting Schedule. Next Meeting The next regular meeting will be held on March 19, 2025, at 2:00 P.M. Page 41 of 184 2/14/2025 Item # 9.A ID# 2025-523 Executive Summary Approve an Amendment to the FY 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program for the Addition of a Transit Project for Capital for Paratransit OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to approve an amendment to the FY 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to add a new paratransit project. CONSIDERATIONS: The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has requested the Collier MPO to amend its FY 2025-2029 TIP to add the following transit project: • 448810-1: Capital to purchase vehicles/equipment for paratransit. Attachment 1 contains Resolution 2025-01, including Exhibits 1 and 2. The MPO is following the TIP amendment public involvement process outlined in the MPO's Public Participation Plan in that this Amendment has been: • Posted for review by the TAC and CAC; • Public comment period announced on the MPO website; and • Distributed via e-mail to applicable list-serve(s). The comment period began on January 17, 2025, and ends with the MPO Board meeting on February 14, 2025. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Technical and Citizens Advisory Committees voted to endorse the Amendment at their meetings on January 27, 2025. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the Amendment and Authorizing Resolution 2025-01. PREPARED BY: Sean Kingston, AICP, PMP, Principal Planner ATTACHMENTS: MPO Resolution 2025-01, including Exhibits 1 and 2 Page 42 of 184 MPO RESOLUTION No. 2025-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO THE FY 2024/25- 2028/29 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, State and federal statutes, rules and regulations require that each designated Metropolitan Planning Organization develop and adopt a Transportation Improvement Program ("TIP") and set forth the procedures for doing so; and WHEREAS, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's (the "MPO") TIP may require amending as authorized and required by 23 C.F.R. Part 450 Sections 326, 328, 330, 332 and 334, and by F.S. § 339.175(6), (8) and (13); and WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT") requested the Collier MPO to amend its FY 2024/25-2028/29 TIP to add Federal Project Number ("FPN") 448810-1, to add capital to purchase vehicles/equipment for Paratransit as shown in Exhibit 1; and WHEREAS, FDOT has submitted a letter to the MPO stating that the amendment is necessary to include in the MPO's TIP to ensure consistency with FDOT's Work Program, as shown in Exhibit 2; and WHEREAS, the MPO announced the TIP Amendment on its website, distributed it via e-mail to various list -serves, and followed all of the steps of its Public Participation Plan through the expiration of the public comment period, which terminated with the MPO's meeting on February 14, 2025; and WHEREAS, the MPO has reviewed the proposed TIP Amendment for this project and determined that it is consistent with the MPO's adopted plans and policies; and WHEREAS, in accordance with all required State and federal procedures, rules and regulations, including but not limited to the FDOT's MPO Administrative Manual, the TIP Amendment must be accompanied by an endorsement indicating official MPO approval. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization that: 1. The FY 2024/25 - 2028/29 Transportation Improvement Program Amendment set forth in Exhibits 1 and 2 is hereby adopted. 2. The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's Chairman is hereby authorized to execute this Resolution certifying the MPO Board's approval of the Amendment to the FY 2024/25-2028/29 Transportation Improvement Program for transmittal to FDOT and the Federal Highway Administration. 1 CHU Page 43 of 184 This Resolution PASSED and duly adopted by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization Board after majority vote on this 141h day of February, 2025. Attest: COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director MPO Chairman Approved as to form and legality: Ik? L i---, Scott R. Teach, Deputy County Attorney Page 44 of 184 EXHIBIT I to Resolution 2025-01 TIP Amendment for Approval by NIPO Board on February 14, 2025 for FY 2024/25 through FV 2028/29 TIP FPN Action Project Name Requested B Fund Amount FY Phase Responsible Agency TIP Location LRTP Reference 5310 CAPITAL Capital to purchase COLLIER COUNTY BOCC DPTO $64,033 Collier Appendix P6-23, Table 448810-1 vehicles/equipment (CAT)— FDOT DU $512,247 25 CAP County K 6-12 for Paratransit BONITA LF $64,035 SPRINGS UZA Attest: COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Date: By: Anne McLaughlin Collier MPO Executive Director MPO Chair Approved as to form and legality Scott R. Teach, Deputy County Attorney Date: CA Page 45 of 184 COLLIER MPO FY 2025 - 2029 TIP 448810-1 5310 CAPITAL COLLIER COUNTY BOCC (CAT) - BONITA SPRINGS LIZA Type of Work Description IPURCHASE VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT Responsible Agency IMANAGED BY COLLIER COUNTY Project Description Icapital for Paratransit Project Length 10 SIS INo _ 2045 LRTP P6-23 Table 6-12 Fund Phase DPTO CAP LF CAP 2025 64,033 64,035 2026 2027 0 o] 0 0 2028 I ul 0 2029 F--01 1 0 Totals F— $64.033.00 $64,035.00 DU CAP 512,247 0 0 1 0 1 0 F $512,247.00 640,315 0 1 01 1 0 I 0 $640,315.00 j Amended at MPO Board 2-14-25 ,AO Page 46 of 184 Docusign Envelope ID: 8D5BB406-AE32-4387-9D15-A4B92B74BBEA Exhibit 2 FDOT Florida Department of Transportation RON DESANTIS 605 Suwannee Street JARED W. PERDUE, P.E. GOVERNOR Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 SECRETARY January 7, 2025 Collier County MPO ATTN: Mrs. Anne McLaughlin, Executive Director 2885 Horseshoe Dr S Naples, FL 34104 RE: Request to Revise Fiscal Year (FY) 2024/25-2028/29 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Dear Mrs. McLaughlin: Florida Department of Transportation requests Collier County MPO revise the FY 2024/25-2028/29 TIP to reflect project changes as described below. Project # 448810-1 is a new Transit project that received 5310 Federal funds to cover capital expenses. Adding a new project requires a TIP amendment so that federal funds can be authorized. Project # 447514-1 was already included the MPO FY 24/25-28/29 TIP. Additional federal funds have been added to the project. TIP modification is needed for transparency and consistency. Please use the information below to revise the TIP accordingly: FM# Project Description Length Phase Fund Source Amount FY 448810-1 5310 CAPITAL 0.000 CAP DPTO $ 64,033 2025 COLLIER COUNTY miles DU $ 512,247 BOCC (CAT) - BONITA LF 64 035 SPRINGS UZA Total $ 640,315 www.fdot.gov C E\ Page 47 of 184 Docusign Envelope ID: 8D5BB406-AE32-4387-9D15-A4B92B74BBEA 447514-1 LIVINGSTON FPL TRAIL 0.000 PD&E DIH $ 5,000 2025 EXT FROM RADIO RD miles SU 700 000 TO COLLIER COUNTY Total $ 705,500 LINE As always, feel free to contact the Liaison Group at D1-Liaisons(aD-dot.state.fl.us if you have any questions. Sincerely, E DoeuSiyned by: (� �4-. V Y4, zL 358572051DDE4C5... Kristi A. Smith, CPM, PLS Community Liaison Manager Cc: Wayne Gaither, FDOT Marcellus Evans, FDOT CAO Page 48 of 184 FLP: TRANSIT hem Number,4488101 DISMa: 01 Project Description: 5310 CAPITAL COWER COUNTY BOCC (CAT) - BONITA SPRINGS UZA Coumy:COWER Type of Work PURCHASE VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT Project Lenglh:0.000 Fiscal Year PMw/RealsanslbU ry Qp.�r 2025 2026 2027 20P8>2028 ARYean CAPRAI/ MAf/AGED 8Y COWER CW NTY FunO Coda: DPTOSTATE-PfO 114,707 84,033 17&740 DUSTATEPRIM—WIFEDERAL REIM8 917,6601 512.247 IA29,907 LF-LOCALFUNDS 115,133 84,035 179,268 Plw-CAPITALTaOIs 1,147,600 640A15 I,7B7,635 ham:44B81017otMl 1,L172 610.315 1,787,816 Pro ectTouls S,]A7,600 610,315 I,7B7,816 Greo0TftM 1,L7,500 810,315 1,787A15 HIGHWAYS Nam Nuft r..U75141 Dls lct: 01 Protect Descrlptl-: WINGSTON FPL TRAIL EXr FROM RADIO RD TO COWERCOUNTY UNE County: COWER Type of Work BIKE PATHRIWL Pmject LengN:0.000 Fiscal Year Phase/Ras onalOU <2025 2026 2026 2027 2028 >2028 ARYwrs PDiE/MANAGED BY FDOT FUM COM: DI; TATEIN�IOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT 5•000 SUSTP, URBAN AREAS> 200K1 700'000 70B'— TLWR-2015 S52514A-TRAIL NETWORK 1,100,000 PhwPDBETla Mm:a7514171s 11,,110000,00000 770055. ym Pro saieels 1.100,wal 705,.000000000 Gand T-1 I.W9,0001 706.000 CAU Page 49 of 184 2/14/2025 Item # 10.A ID# 2025-524 Executive Summary Elect Representatives to Serve on the Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council Board for 2025 OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to elect or re-elect a Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC) Board representative and alternate for calendar year 2025. CONSIDERATIONS: The administrative rule of the MPOAC provides that "by no later than December 31 st of each year, each metropolitan planning organization shall appoint its representative to the MPOAC to serve for the succeeding calendar year." The current Collier MPO primary representative is Commissioner William McDaniel, Jr., and the current alternate representative is Commissioner Burt Saunders. The MPO Executive Director has reached out to Commissioners McDaniel and Saunders respectively and confirmed that Commissioner McDaniel desires to continue as primary representative for 2025 and Commissioner Saunders desires to continue as an alternate representative for 2025. The MPOAC typically meets quarterly on the fourth Thursday of the month, in Orlando. The tentative dates and locations for the 2025 MPOAC meetings are as follows: February 27, 2025 Orlando, FL April 24, 2025 Orlando, FL July 24, 2025 Orlando, FL October 23, 2025 Orlando, FL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the MPO Board elect or re-elect an MPOAC representative and alternate for calendar year 2025. PREPARED BY: Dusty Hansen, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: None Page 50 of 184 2/14/2025 Item # 10.13 ID# 2025-525 Executive Summary Adopt Florida Department of Transportation Target Zero Safety Performance Targets for Calendar Year 2025 OBJECTIVE: For the Board to adopt the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Safety Performance Targets for calendar year 2025. CONSIDERATIONS: Safety Targets are the only federal Transportation Performance Measure that must be adopted annually. FDOT establishes the State's safety targets in the Highway Safety Improvement Plan. FDOT is maintaining its Target Zero safety performance targets for 2025: zero fatalities and zero serious injuries on Florida roadways. MPOs have the option to either adopt the Statewide safety targets or establish their own quantifiable safety targets. Collier MPO has consistently elected to adopt the FDOT statewide targets. Performance metrics for Collier County (for 2022) are shown in the following screenshots taken from FDOT's online Sourcebook on 11/21/24: Collier County — Number and Rate of Fatalities Select from Drop -down FDOT District County Fatalities 45 'r 9. 80/a in 2022 from 2021 Ra to of Fatalities per 100 Million VNlT 1.10 4. 7O/o in 2022 from 2021 Comparison Year 2021 1 O < %Change in Number -of Fatatit its Nate- Toreturn to the statewide view after filtering Ity FDOT District Ind County, please 9!I!G "All" FDOT DittriCtS and "All" Counties. Highway System Ia6pIIC goads Number of Fatalities 2018 2019 2040 2021 2022 Rate of Fatalities 261E =9 202D 2021 =2 Page 51 of 184 Collier County — Number and Rate of Serious Injuries Select from Drop-dovrn FDOT District County - � Cpllier 0 200 Serious Injuries H 222 0.4% 1CO in 2022 from 2021 Rate of Serious Injurles Fr r per 100 Million VMT } 5.45 5.1% in 2022 from 2021 Com pa ri sort Yea r -E 202: 0 < g --.00 %Change in Number of Serious Injuries �y Note: etum to the statewide View after filtering by FOOT District p , Cour:y, please 0. W sele.: FDOT Districts and"Ali" Counties. Collier County — Pedestrian Fatalities and Serious Injuries Select from Drop -down FOOT District Coun y S •l ' L — — � 7 •.A { Z Highway System Number of Serious Injuries 2019 2020 2O21 2022 Rate of Serious Injuries ---- ---_ �020 2021 2022 Pedestrian Fatalities r - a `k Fatalities 4 5 t25.0°/a in 2022 from 2021 7 2D-! 2OL21 2022 Serious lnjurle5 Pedestrian Serious injuries 21 'r133.30/b Y.i 3v In2022 from 2021 Com parison Year m 2O %Change in Number of Fatalities f'� P 3 C _ 1rS to Nate: To return to "a statewi de view after fiitering by FDOT D-strict 9= Courry, please select"All"FDOTDistrictsand "All"Counties. 2G18_--- 2/14/2025 Item # 10.13 ID# 2025-525 Page 52 of 184 Collier County — Bicyclist Fatalities and Serious Injuries Select from Drop -dawn Ill District County Fatalities 5 'i`25,00/b z in 2022 -- o Zola 20_5 MID 2021 2o22 Serious Injuries` Bicyclist Serious Injuries 20 '[`65.7% in 2022 from 2021 2_ [vmpa ri san Yea r -� 2021 0 { %Change in Numll of Fatalities c N Not.. To return to the s-=:= __. _.. _-_ - ^i n p by F00T Oistri¢= County, please 0 select "AEI" FDOT M5 - : - - : _ = 2018 2M L 2021 2022 Bicyclist Fatalities 2/14/2025 Item # 10.13 ID# 2025-525 FDOT's highway safety performance data from its recent Highway Safety System Performance Report (Attachment 1) is below: FDOT's Statewide Existing Conditions Performance Data HIGHWAY SAFETY PERFORMANCE DATA Ill Pe"Ormsnto M4d:ure iFivwTaar Rolling AtNf29o} 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CALENDAR YEAR 2023 TARGET 9.109 3.192 2.306 3.387 3.441 0 t 1,42 1,47 1.52 1.54 1.54 0 20.181 18.994 18.030 17.146 16.381 0 9.30 8.72 8,25 7.79 734 0 3.290 3,194 3,190 3,154 3.148 0 By supporting FDOT's Target Zero Statewide safety targets, the MPO is making a commitment to support FDOT's investments in safety improvements and to making safety a priority in the development of the Long -Range Transportation Plan and the Transportation Improvement Program. Page 53 of 184 2/14/2025 Item # 10.13 ID# 2025-525 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Technical and Citizens Advisory Committees voted to endorse the Target Zero Safety Performance Targets at their January 27 meetings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board adopt the FDOT Target Zero Safety Performance Targets for calendar year 2025 and authorize the Chair to execute the proposed Resolution (Attachment 2) memorializing the same. PREPARED BY: Dusty Hansen, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: FDOT System Performance Report, Highway Safety, January 2025 MPO Resolution 2025-02 Page 54 of 184 STATEWIDE PM1: HIGHWAY SAFET_" The first of FHWA's performance management rule establishes measures to assess safety on all public roads and the process for tFDOT and Florida's MPOs to establish and report their safety targets. GOALS LAW 2045 FTP GOAL Safety and security for residents, visitors, and businesses. IMPORTANCIA To achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. FDOT's top priority is to provide a safe transportation system that efficiently moves people and goods throughout Florida. Safety is an important focus throughout all of the state's planning efforts. The Florida SHSP, developed by FDOT and its safety partners, serves as a framework of plans and activities that will improve safety and efficiency on our roadways with an ultimate goal of zero fatalities and serious injuries. Florida's safety vision focuses on motor vehicle safety and includes pedestrians, bicyclists, motorcyclists, micromobility device users, and transit users using the roadway system, as well as connections between the roadway system and other modes of transportation. The total number of persons suffering fatal injuries in a motor vehicle crash during a 5-year rolling average. The total number of fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in a 5-year rolling average. The total number of persons suffering at least one serious injury in a motor vehicle crash during a 5-year rolling average. The total number of serious injuries per 100 million VMT in a 5-year rolling average. The combined total number of non -motorized fatalities and non -motorized serious injuries involving a motor vehicle during a 5-year rolling average. Page 55 of 184 HIGHWAY SAFETY PERFORMANCE DATA Federal Performance Measure (Five -Year Rolling Average) 2055 Florida Transportation Plan CALENDAR YEAR 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2023 TARGET The personal and societal costs of traffic crashes in Florida today are unacceptably high. More than 3,100 Florida residents and visitors die in a crash each year, and more than 18,000 are seriously injured. The number of fatalities and fatality rate have increased annually since the last performance report, while serious injuries and the serious injuries rate have shown a steady decrease. Nonmotorized fatalities and serious injuries are also declining. FDOT and the MPOs continuously discuss and reevaluate safety needs and strategies, with an emphasis on making progress toward the target of zero. FDOT closely monitors safety performance and uses this information to guide decision making. The safety projects selected and funded reflect the collaboration between the MPOs and FDOT in recognizing the vision of Target Zero and jointly implementing strategies to achieve zero. FDOT and all 27 Florida MPOs support the vision of zero fatalities and serious injuries. A total of 21 MPOs supported the statewide targets for 2024 and 6 MPOs established specific targets for their planning area. The following table shows performance since the last FTP with data from 2019 to current progress in 2023. Systems Forecasting '0111 01 & Tr nd Off' e S Ice Page 56 of 184 MPO PM1: HIGHWAY SAFETY MPO # of Fatalities 2023 Statewide Target. 0 2019 Performance 2023 Performance Rate of Fatalities per 100M VMT 2023 Statewide Target. 0 2019 Performance 2023 Performance Bay County TPO Broward MPO 31.6 225.4 36.8 249.8 1.584 1.302 1.806 1.531 Charlotte County -Punta Gorda MPO 25.8 30.0 1.063 1.168 Collier MPO 41.2 44.0 1.105 1.117 Florida -Alabama TPO* 85.0 86.0 1.410 1.360 Gainesville MTPO 73.0 58.0 2.250 1.690 Heartland Regional TPO 77.6 93.8 2.465 2.860 Indian River County MPO 25.0 19.0 1.440 1.040 Lake -Sumter MPO 78.8 93.2 1.474 1.606 Lee County MPO 101.0 116.4 1.313 1.430 Martin MPO 28.0 26.4 1.256 1.430 MetroPlan Orlando 272.8 300.4 1.180 1.258 Miami -Dade TPO 303.0 327.6 1.509 1.630 North Florida TPO 226.4 251.4 1.323 1.424 Okaloosa-Walton TPO* 58.0 50.0 1.510 1.240 Palm Beach TPA 176.0 197.6 1.262 1.403 Polk TPO 122.0 146.8 1.598 1.884 Sarasota/Manatee MPO 119.2 125.6 1.448 1.454 Space Coast TPO 87.0 93.4 1.302 1.355 St. Lucie TPO Volusia-Flagler TPO Capital-.. •. 38.2 137.0 9 45.2 134.0 a 1.111 1.800 0 * MPO/TPO includes partial counties, data is presented for whole counties where applicable. Partial county data is not available .149 1.394 Page 57 of 184 2055 Florida Transportation Plan # of Serious Injuries Rate of Serious Injuries per 100M VMT # of Non -Motorized Fatalities and Non -Motorized Serious Injuries 2023 Statewide Target: 0 2023 Statewide Target: 0 2023 Statewide Target: 0 2019 Performance 2023 Performance 2019 Performance 2023 Performance 2019 Performance 2023 Performance 208.2 1363.6 149.0 1156.0 10.449 7.890 7.289 7.019 38.2 311.4 31.8 282.8 109.4 163.0 4.517 6.279 19.0 25.0 233.2 224.2 6.234 5.617 45.0 44.2 306.0 385.0 5.080 6.080 19.0 27.0 305.0 193.0 9.390 5.630 11.0 14.0 467.2 320.2 14.839 9.834 34.8 35.2 106.0 102.0 6.090 5.590 7.0 6.0 521.2 548.8 9.716 9.485 49.2 56.8 562.6 640.0 7.292 7.890 98.8 116.6 111.0 125.2 4.945 5.073 16.2 17.6 2576.8 1763.4 11.318 7.431 382.4 333.4 1662.4 1325.6 8.281 6.578 421.8 385.0 1104.4 860.6 6.486 4.870 178.6 172.0 195.0 338.0 5.090 8.360 13.0 17.0 1095.8 881.2 7.850 6.261 205.4 198.4 474.0 434.2 6.342 5.488 77.0 85.0 1504.0 971.4 18.275 11.304 184.4 171.6 546.6 431.4 8.203 6.265 84.6 88.6 146.0 796.0 158.6 4.277 4.350 25.6 569.0 10.470 6.870 40.0 32.0 45.0 Systems Forecasting A� & Trends Office Page 58 of 184 MPO RESOLUTION No. 2025-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION ADOPTING THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S TARGET ZERO SAFETY TARGETS FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2025 WHEREAS, Under the Highway Safety Improvement Program and Safety Performance Management Measures Final Rule effective 4/14/2016 (see 81 FR 13881 and 23 CFR 490.209), all MPOs were required to adopt Safety Performance Targets by the end of February 2018; and WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT") establishes statewide safety targets for the following calendar year as part of the Highway Safety Improvement Plan Annual Report, which must be submitted by August 31 s' each year; and WHEREAS, MPOs must set targets by February 271 of each year (within 180 days after FDOT sets targets) or establish their own targets for the MPO planning area; and WHEREAS, MPOs must include the most recent reported performance and targets with each Transportation Improvement Program ("TIP") update and include a System Performance Report in the Long Range Transportation Plan ("LRTP") that discusses the performance of the transportation system and progress achieved in meeting the targets over time; and WHEREAS, beginning with the initial deadline in February 2018, the Collier MPO has consistently voted to adopt the FDOT statewide Target Zero safety targets. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization that: 1. The FDOT Target Zero safety targets shown in Exhibit 1 are hereby adopted for calendar year 2025. 2. The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's Chairman is hereby authorized to execute this Resolution certifying the MPO Board's adoption of the safety targets for transmittal to FDOT and the Federal Highway Administration. MPO Resolution 2025-02 Pagel of 3 +,Ao Page 59 of 184 This Resolution PASSED and duly adopted by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization Board after majority vote on this 14" day of February 2025. Attest: Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Approved as to form and legality: Scott R. Teach, Deputy County Attorney COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 26-fi MPO Chairman MPO Resolution 2025-02 Page 2 of 3 (-;FAO Page 60 of 184 EXHIBIT 1 FDOT HIGHWAY SAFETY PERFORMANCE TARGETS FOR 2025 Performance Measure Target Number of Fatalities 0 Rate of Fatalities per 100 Million VMT* 0 Number of Serious Injuries 0 Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 Million VMT 0 Number of Non -Motorized Fatalities & Serious Injuries 0 *VMT: Vehicle Miles Traveled MPO Resolution 2025-02 Page 3 of 3 CAO Page 61 of 184 2/14/2025 Item # 10.0 ID# 2025-526 Executive Summary Approve a Reappointment to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve the reappointment of a member to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC). CONSIDERATIONS: The term for current BPAC member Anthony Matonti is up for renewal, and staff is recommending that he be reappointed for a new two-year term. Mr. Matonti is a native Floridian and currently serves as the BPAC Chair. As an urban planner and builder, Mr. Matonti has worked for the Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority, served as project manager for various major real estate development companies, and currently provides planning, pre - construction, and building services for clients in the private sector. Mr. Matonti has extensive experience working with MPOs, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), and the public. He also serves on the City of Naples Community Redevelopment Agency Advisory Board. (Attachment 1) (The BPAC membership roster is included as Attachment 2). COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the reappointment of Anthony Matonti to BPAC. PREPARED BY: Suzanne Miceli, Operations Support Specialist II ATTACHMENTS: Anthony Matonti BPAC Reappointment Application BPAC Membership Roster 2024.12.13 Page 62 of 184 Alb, COLLIER Metropolitan Planning Organization REQUEST FOR REAPPOINTMENT TO AN MPO COMMITTEE Date: 28 .January 2025 I, Anthony Matonti, have been notified that my term on the Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee has, or will soon expire; therefore, I do hereby request to remain a member of the MPO advisory committee and request that the MPO Board reappoints me to that committee for another term. My updated MPO Advisory Committee Application form is attached. Sincerely, tl wza�';Z& Signatur Page 63 of 184 _ COLLIER MPO (METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION) COLLIER Metropolitan Planning Organization ADVISORY COMMITTEE/BOARD APPLICATION Return Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization Application 2885 South Horseshoe Drive to: Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5884 Email: AnneMcLau hg linkcollier_og v net Name: MATONTI ANTHONY VINCENT Last First Middle Address: 7170 WILTON DRIVE N City: NAPLES Zip Code: 34109 Home Telephone: 9542887083 Contact Time: 8-5 Email Address: ANTHONY@URBANSEEDLLC.COM Referred By: ANNE MCLAUGHLIN Date Available: CURRENT I am applying for: BICUCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE Please note: Year-round residents are eligible to apply. Your application will remain active in the MPO's Office for one (1) year. The application must be complete in order to be considered. Read "Important Information" section on the second page of the application, then sign and date the application. (Use additional pages as needed.) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT LEGIBLY 28 January 2025 Date: Commission District #/City #2 Tribal Affiliation: If you are a member of, or officially represent a nonprofit or public agency, identify here, and provide link to website: Please list any Advisory Committees or Boards on which you currently serve: 1. MPO BPAC 3, 2. City of Naples, CRA Advisory Board 4, Have you previously served on an MPO advisory committee or board? Please specify committee/board and dates served: COLLIER COUNTY MPO BPAC - 2018 to Present Technical Advisory Committees - Forward Pinellas, Sarasota/Manatee MPO, Hillsborough MPO 2015-2017 Occupation & Employer (if retired, please indicate): Self Employed Planner/Builder- Prinicpal, Urban Seed LLC Page 64 of 184 Please describe your background and experience which you feel provides a useful perspective for this Committee/Board. Native Floridian, Urban Planner, and Builder currently serving as the Chair of the MPO Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Cmt. Previously worked as a Senior Planner for the Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority and Senior Project Manager for major real estate development companies. Extensive experience working alongside MPOs, FDOT, and the public. Currently provide planning, pre -construction, and building services for clients in the private sector. Current knowledge of construction methods, materials, and sub contractor pricing. Please describe any public involvement or community service you've been involved in either locally or otherwise (in addition to Committees and Boards you currently serve on.) Community Redevlopment Agency Advisory Board, City of Naples (2023-Present) What other MPO advisory committee(s) would you be willing to serve on? CAC Several of the MPO advisory committees/boards have specific membership requirements. To assist the Collier MPO in its selection process, please check as many of the following categories that apply: 1. Year-round resident of: • Collier County (unincorporated area) X • City of Naples • City of Marco Island • Everglades City 2. Member of one of the following organizations or groups: • AARP • Adventure Cycling • Bicycling/Walking Advocacy Group: • Professional Association: American Planning Association X • Chamber of Commerce: • Visitors & Tourism Bureau • Community Redevelopment Agency X • NAACP • Historical Preservation Society: • Homeowners' Association: Former VP, Avery Square X Page 65 of 184 Environmental Group: Home Builders Association Collier County Public Schools Other NGO, Community Association Agricultural Industry Trucking Industry Other, please specify 3. Representative of one of the following: Persons with Disabilities Major Employer in the MPO Region Small Business Owner Urban Seed LLC & Matonti Dental State, City or County Department of Children & Families State, City or County Department of Health State, City, or County Department of Education Educational Institution Elderly Health Care Provider Other Health Care Provider Transit Rider(s) Developmental Disability Service Provider Elderly — Advocate/Instructor - Mobility and Access to Services Veterans — Advocate/Instructor — Mobility & Access to Services Family Service Provider Police, Sheriff Department Community Transportation Safety Team Member Minorities & Disadvantaged Populations, Advocate/Service Provider Tribal Member, Officially Designated Representative Tribal Member, Acting in Individual Capacity Other, please specify 4. Professional/Career Credentials: Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety Instructor American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) Registered Architect or Landscape Architect Licensed Attorney Licensed Engineer Licensed General Contractor Licensed First Responder or Health Care Professional Licensed Realtor Other, please specify x Page 66 of 184 5. Knowledge, training, background, interest or experience in: • Natural Sciences, Environmental Conservation x • Mobility & Access for the workforce x • Public Finance, Grants, NGOs x • Sustainable Development, Sustainable Transportation x • Planning, Engineering, Architecture, Landscape Architecture x • Economic Development x • Land Development/Redevelopment x • Archaeological, Cultural & Historic Resources _ • Mobility/Active Living (related to community health) x • Tourism Industry _ • Parent, Advocate for Working Families x • Other, please specify Building Construction x The Collier MPO strives to ensure equal access and representation for minorities, women and those with disabilities to serve on advisory boards/committees. Questions 6 through 8 are OPTIONAL 4 r,,..a,,.,. • Female _ • Male x 7. Race/Ethnicity: • White x • Hispanic or Latino _ • Black or African American • Asian or Pacific Islander _ • American Indian or Alaskan Native _ • Other: 8. Handicapped/Disabled: • Yes _ • No x Page 67 of 184 IMPORTANT INFORMATION: • Be advised that membership on certain advisory committees/boards may involve financial disclosure or the submission of other information. • Florida State Statute 119.07 designates that this application as a public document be made available for anyone requesting to view it. .................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 Your application is not complete until you answer the following question, sign and date the form. Are you related to any member of the Collier MPO? YES X NO Applicant's Signature: Date Signed: 28 January 2025 Page 68 of 184 ,t 0) I M N It It N � M N N � N � M N N � � p N � CD m N m M r CD co r M r N CM r N N �j`C1i A N r N N N N r r N N r NLO r r N r N N H LO N N O N O N LO N (.0 N (.0 N LO N (.0N N L •�+ rs CN 00 CN M r —CY) 00 M M r M N 04 N CN N N N N N r N r N N N r NLO r M N r N N S. Qi O I CD 1 CD 1 1 ON N \ N \ N \ N \ (� CO Cfl LO It Cfl CO Ln N r (fl O) N N 0 U EO E O E 15 C W 0 � U O � E o a)V) U U @ ° m E E _� C O E o U O O _ (6 E (6 rCY Q O C Mco C) N ca E o i � O O O > E O C) O O Q ❑ m o O C E E 0 u > N N CD CD O !'. CD 00 Lam') 0') O f— O CR') Cf) O co Z 't '1 OLO 00 O N M N 00 O CA O O) C') O LO O LO co It i N i CO Cfl N 00 O r � 00 00 00 00 0)O 00 00M � � M N Ll- r— O � & 00 A co O) LO 00 It N CD 00 C�) CV N N N 00 M CD M N O) T N co M N V) O O E O E M N ItN O 00 M N It'+ 00 It It U O O a)) 2 2 N LL O O r i6 r UO 07 O ,It L ❑ C) �N _ U� i. C C) L r (6 Z (6CO r J ULL OM CLJ a) r Or O Cr C� Jr aM U� r JOO =CM OM OM 5 N OU > C7CM ACM �cco OJ OLL V)CO Q �r zJ C Cn0 p)J O C Q �� OJ �J M a) �J i. O� O M LL a) L O r � LL C M J Y L V N 0) LL (6 N LL > LL C1 -0 0 LL > 2� J LL > N Q M (0 Q V) N O E i w O N !-' w N O Q Vi o N Vi o0 4) p m> V V) Vi 4) �+ t` M Q � LO i O c) M E (n LO = co t O O C CL O Nz Lnz _O COz r m Mz LO z 00 M LO m rl r 2 ) Z > N C`)LO CD O � Qz 00 M C CEO r CD .0 N 0) 0) C C w+ •y R V N lC C 3 r V L- r = O L p 0 7 >> y a i 0 Cl)Y= O d> U G N 'C Z{ �. � ca a�UQ is = �� C ax r � O o V LO N O O O7 �> c O a > cn> m � Y Y co r O m (fl 0) (0 d 2/14/2025 Item # 10.1) ID# 2025-527 Executive Summary Approve a New Appointment to the Citizens Advisory Committee OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve a new appointment to the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC). CONSIDERATIONS: Harry Henkel was appointed by the City of Everglades City in 2023 to serve on the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). Since the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) representative for the City of Everglades City is retiring her membership, Everglades City has opted to reassign Mr. Henkel to the CAC and will be presenting a new TAC appointee in the near future. (Attachment 2) Mr. Henkel is involved in several community organizations in Everglades City and was an active TAC member with excellent attendance. He has expressed his enthusiasm to serve on the CAC (Attachment 1). (The CAC membership roster is included as Attachment 3.) COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the appointment of Mr. Henkel to the Citizens Advisory Committee for a three-year term. PREPARED BY: Suzanne Miceli, Operations Support Specialist II ATTACHMENTS: Harry Henkel CAC Appointment Application Email notice of Everglades City Mayor's appointment of Mr. Henkel to the CAC CAC Membership Roster 2025.02.07 Page 70 of 184 Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization lJ 1111 ADVISORY COMMITTEEIBOARD APPLICATION COLLIER Metropditan Planning Organ ufflm Please complete this fillable application form and return to: Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, EL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5884 1 Email: Collier.mpo@colliercountyfl.gov City/State Phone: q0 e- 1A 7 1 �k Best hours to contact you: Email 6A,t~0Y./x�ht►)60 W 9ynAiC,e1� Zip Code: - yi I q Aoymo Referred By: L/mni i 0 je -"T Date available: Board/Committee for which you are applying: C, '-I - Please note: Year-round residents are eligible to apply. Your application will remain active in the MPO's Office for one (1) year. The application must be complete in order to be considered. Read "Important Information " section on the second page of the application, then sign and date the application. (Use additional pages as needed.) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT LEGIBLY Date: Commission District #/City Tribal Affiliation: If you are a member of, or officially represent a nonprofit or public agency, identify here, and provide link to website (multi -line fillable text box) Please list any Advisory Committees or Boards on which you currently serve: 3. 2. 4. Have you previously served on an MPO advisory committee or board? Please specify committee/board and dates served (multi -line fillable text box): Occupation & Employer (if retired, please indicate) (multi -line fillable text box): Page 71 of 184 Please describe your background and experience which you feel provides a useful perspective for this Committee/Board. (multi -line fiilable text box): U•G 7.� � �; fr Y� / r✓ ,S tr v�r n� C a ►� Ynv � i �`' Please describe any public involvement or community service you've been involved in either locally or otherwise (in addition to Committees and Boards you currently serve on.) (multi -line fillable text box): 74C Are there MPO advisory committee(s) you would also be interested to serve ? (multi - line tillable text Several of the MPO advisory committees/boards have specific membership requirements. To assist the Collier MPO in its selection process, please check as many of the following categories that apply. 1. Year-round resident of: 0 Collier County (unincorporated area) City of Naples City of Marco Island ® Everglades City 2. Member of one of the followinz or anizations or rou s: AARP ❑ Adventure Cycling Bicycling/Walking Advocacy Group: Professional Association: Chamber of Commerce: Visitors & Tourism Bureau Community Redevelopment Agency NAACP Historical Preservation Society: ® Homeowners' Association: fA , S� yr" (yo 44c_ j e y >Y I L az If Y Page 72 of 184 ❑ Environmental Group: ❑ Home Builders Association ❑ Collier County Public Schools ❑ Other NGO, Community Association ❑ Agricultural Industry ❑ Trucking Industry ❑ Other, please specify 3. Representative of one of the following: ❑ Persons with Disabilities ❑ Major Employer in the MPO Region ❑ Small Business Owner ❑ State, City or County Department of Children & Families ❑ State, City or County Department of Health ❑ State, City, or County Department of Education ❑ Educational Institution ❑ Elderly Health Care Provider ❑ Other Health Care Provider ❑ Transit Rider(s) ❑ Developmental Disability Service Provider ❑ Elderly — Advocate/Instructor - Mobility and Access to Services ❑ Veterans — Advocate/Instructor — Mobility & Access to Services ❑ Family Service Provider ❑ Police, Sheriff Department ❑ Community Transportation Safety Team Member ❑ Minorities & Disadvantaged Populations, Advocate/Service Provider ❑ Tribal Member, Officially Designated Representative ❑ Tribal Member, Acting in Individual Capacity ❑ Other, please specify 4. Professional/Career Credentials: ❑ Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety Instructor ❑ American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) ❑ Registered Architect or Landscape Architect ❑ Licensed Attorney ❑ Licensed Engineer ❑ Licensed General Contractor ❑ Licensed First Responder or Health Care Professional ❑ Licensed Realtor i ® Other, please specify: Ow ���17 m'M �° ✓l Page 73 of 184 5. Knowledge, training, background, interest or experience in: ❑ Natural Sciences, Environmental Conservation ❑ Mobility & Access for the workforce ❑ Public Finance, Grants, NGOs ❑ Sustainable Development, Sustainable Transportation ❑ Planning, Engineering, Architecture, Landscape Architecture ❑ Economic Development ❑ Land Development/Redevelopment ❑ Archaeological, Cultural & Historic Resources ❑ Mobility/Active Living (related to community health) ❑ Tourism Industry Parent, Advocate for Working Families Other, please specify /j�.l "J ey M 1 o 4N 'N 6 v j 1y" The Collier MPO strives to ensure equal access and representation for minorities, women and those with disabilities to serve on advisory boards/committees. uestions 6 through 8 are OPTIONAL 6. Gender: ❑ Female ® Male 7. Race/Ethnicity: Q White ❑ Hispanic or Latino ❑ Black or African American ❑ Asian or Pacific Islander American ❑ Indian or Alaskan Native ❑ Other: 18. Handicapped/Disabled: ❑ Yes No Page 74 of 184 IMPORTANT INFORMATION: • Be advised that membership on certain advisory committees/boards may involve financial disclosure or the submission of other information. • Florida State Statute 119.07 designates that this application as a public document be made available for anyone requesting to view it. Your application is not complete until you answer the foliowing question. si and date the form. Are you related to any member of the Collier MPO? YES NO Applicant's Signature: Date Signed: Z./ G1 / ?-d 2 S Page 75 of 184 From: Anne McLaughlin To: Elaine Middelstaedt Cc: Sean Kingston; Dusty Hansen; Suzanne Miceli Subject: RE: January 27, 2025 1 Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Meeting I Committee Members Date: Friday, January 17, 2025 1:23:31 PM Attachments: ima,e�jpg image002.ong Hi Elaine, We'll take Harry's reassignment to CAC to the MPO Board for approval on February 14th. The change could be effective immediately and he could go the Feb 24th CAC meeting in your place, if you both prefer, or it can wait until the March meeting because your appointment is good through the end of February. Regards, Anne McLaughlin Executive Director A 2885 S. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL, 34104 Anne.McLaughlinCcbcolliercountyfLgov 239-252-5884 (o) 239-919-4378 (cell) www.colliermpo.org From: Elaine Middelstaedt <elaineecity@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2025 12:37 PM To: Suzanne Miceli <Suzanne.Miceli@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Anne McLaughlin <Anne.McLaugh lin@colliercountyfl.gov>; Sean Kingston <Sean.Kingston @colliercountyfl.gov>; Dusty Hansen <Dusty.Hansen @colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: January 27, 2025 1 Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Meeting I Committee Members EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I will attend. Harry Henkel was asked by Mayor Howie Grimm and has agreed to become my replacement. What is the first meeting he should attend? He will drop TAC in favor of the CAC. Elaine On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 10:33 AM Suzanne Miceli <Suzanne.MiceliCa)colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Page 76 of 184 Dear CAC Members, *PLEASE RSVP IF YOU WILL ATTEND THIS IN -PERSON MEETING* This email serves as a reminder: *Note: CAC meetings will be held in the South Conference Room moving forward. Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Meeting Monday, January 27, 2025 1 2:00— 4:00 pm Collier County Transportation Management Services Bldg. South Conference Room 2885 South Horseshoe Drive Naples. FL 34104 The agenda may be viewed at the following link: January 27, 2025 CAC Agenda Meeting information may also be accessed on our website at: colliermpo.org Respectfully, Suzanne Miceli Operations Support Specialist II 2885 S. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL, 34104 Suzanne. Miceli CcDcolliercountyfl.gov colliermpo.org Office: 239-252-5814 Mobile: 239-450-8136 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Page 77 of 184 w CU 0O O N O N O� N N cM N N CD N N N CD N CD O N cd (� N N n p N ON n O N N Ln O N N N CD N N N _^ M f U N U cC Q M °' •� °' o � y ar ce o .� oA y oA � '.� � � `'" w r+•+ +, A Q w Q Q) as 3 U O M F O V OV � G - ~ W 0 cd �# O c17 a\ +- � u O N N � 64 4N N bi U O ~ O, N M iOn�00 NNyN M 6\ o Mu N y� Q.) NN cn cli M O 0 It M O �•-r y N � w M ti CD M l� It M Q w — M 0 w M w w � z 0 o tn ar w Qr z � z z " ,� � W Qo,.�(cd j � U o Z Z LIS ao�"� > �� o o �Q w U o a ova r, a " c7 ��� �N Q V ai a �." O y M . u LrI Z N A 4 Z � ti N W M Q M > > > �� > 00 0 00 m 01 c6 d 2/14/2025 Item # 10.E ID# 2025-529 Executive Summary Review and Approve Scope of Services for Joint Lee/Collier Regional Congestion Management Process OBJECTIVE: To hire a consultant to develop Collier MPO's component of a Joint Lee/Collier Regional Congestion Management Process (CMP) Element for the Long Range Transportation Plan. CONSIDERATIONS: Lee and Collier MPO staff have developed a proposed Scope of Services for a Regional CMP Element to be incorporated into each MPO's LRTP (Attachment 1). Staff presented the draft scope to the Congestion Management, Citizens Advisory, and Technical Advisory Committees for endorsement in January 2025. The Regional CMP Element will address regional roadways within the Bonita Springs -Estero Urban Area that is part of the Lee County Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA), including Alico Road on the north and extending south to include Immokalee Road in Collier County (Attachment 2). The Regional Roadway Network map approved by both MPO Boards in 2017 is shown in Attachment 3. The regional coordination for this project helps fulfill commitments made during discussions that arose from efforts by the Legislature to consolidate the two MPOs last year. Regional coordination on the CMP is consistent with the Unified Planning Work Program, which calls for coordination with Lee MPO in developing Collier MPO's update. Lee MPO's advisory committees and Board have reviewed and approved the Scope of Services. Upon receiving Board approval, Collier MPO staff will initiate the procurement process with the goal of hiring a consultant that is approved under both MPOs' General Planning Contracts and request concurrence from FHWA and FDOT. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Congestion Management, Citizens Advisory, and Technical Advisory Committees reviewed and endorsed the Scope of Services at their January 2025 meetings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board review and approve the Scope of Services and authorize staff to initiate the procurement process. PREPARED BY: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENTS: Regional Congestion Management Process Element Proposed Scope of Services Bonita Springs Urban Area / Regional CMP Study Area Boundary Collier Lee Regional Roadway Network (2017) Page 79 of 184 REGIONAL CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS ELEMENT SCOPE OF SERVICES Background The federal government requires all urbanized areas to have in place a continuing, cooperative and comprehensive transportation (3-C) planning process as a condition to the receipt of federal capital or operating assistance. As part of this 3-C planning process the MPO is required to prepare and adopt a 20 year Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). The LRTP is made up of several components including the Freight and Goods Movement element, the Congestion Management Process (CMP) element, the Bicycle Pedestrian element and Transit element. This Scope of Services has been written for the update and development of the Congestion Management Process Element for the 2050 LRTP. For this LRTP update, the two MPOs are developing a regional Congestion Management Process component of the CMP which will be included in both the Lee and Collier MPO plans. The regional CMP component is being developed to help the MPOs meet one of the commitments that was made as part of the consolidation discussions last year. In addition, this analysis is being done to help address commuting congestion during the peak hours between the two MPO urbanized areas. Task 1 — Kickoff Meeting and Project Management The Consultant will provide overall project management, QA/QC review of documents and provide support services as needed. Coordination between the two Lee and Collier Project Managers and the Consultant Project Manager will be conducted on a routine schedule to ensure management of the schedule, resolve any issues/questions and get timely review of the project deliverables. The Consultant will schedule a virtual meeting with the Lee and Collier MPO staff to discuss the scope, schedule and data/previous reports and studies needed for the update and development of the 2050 CMP Element. Deliverables: • Kick off meeting and meeting summary • Project schedule with updates • Periodic Teams coordination meetings Task 2 — Update of the Current Regional Objectives, Performance Measures and Define the CMP Network The Consultant will update the current regional objectives using the MPOs previous CMP as well as the current goals and objectives in the 2050 LRTP that is under development. This will also include a review of the performance measures that are currently being used to define how the multi -modal transportation system is operating and make recommended changes as needed. 11Page Page 80 of 184 The MPO staff is proposing that the CMP network for this update include the joint regional Lee and Collier roadway network, the most recent version that was approved by the Joint MPO Board's back in 2017 (attached). The separate regional component that will be included in both MPO plans will include the regional roadways that are within the portion of the Bonita urbanized area that is a part of the Lee County MPA down to Immokalee Road in Collier County. From the US census analysis, this equates to the area In Lee County where more than 50% of the commuters living in Lee County commute to the Bonita urbanized area. The Consultant will review and make recommendations to the two MPO's where the regional network needs to be revised to address any recent changes or planned changes to the roadway system. The CMP bicycle pedestrian network will follow the facilities on the regional roadway map as well as the SUN (Shared Use Network) facilities in Lee and Collier Counties. The transit network will follow the service routes and new potential routes consistent with the regional roadway network map as well. Deliverables: • Updated regional CMP objectives and performance measures • Updated regional network maps and tables Task 3 — Overview of Current CMP Policies, Procedures and Requirements The Consultant will provide an overview and background of each of the MPOs CMP requirements and update the documentation, as necessary. This task will also include documenting the current programmed projects on the regional roadway network that are planned to be implemented to help address congestion and safety issues on the CMP network. Examples of these projects for inclusion include the US 41 and Bonita Beach Road displaced left that is programmed for design in FY 2026 and the 1-75 and Pine Ridge Road DDI that is currently being designed. Deliverables: • Documentation and update of each MPOs CMP policies, procedures and requirements • Develop table and map of the programmed congestion and safety improvements 2 1 P a g e Page 81 of 184 Task 4: Identify Congested Corridors and Hot Spots and Document Potential Toolbox Solutions Utilizing existing and prior studies, reports and databases, the Consultant will develop corridor level travel summaries of conditions. The summaries will also include information on peak hour bottlenecks to identify hot spot locations to focus on for identifying potential improvements. This task will include the analysis of non -re -occurring (crash, incidents, construction etc.) congestion and the impacts of that on the other regional facilities. The Consultant should use pictures, video, maps and any other visual data available to illustrate the issues that are experienced on the congested corridors and intersection hot Spots. The data sources that should be reviewed and used for this analysis includes the following: • Prior Lee and Collier Congestion Management Process documents and projects • Lee County Traffic System and Management Operations (TS&MO) Plan • FDOT Districtwide LOS Analysis • District One regional model runs to date (E+C and Alt 1 as of November 2024) • Collier County Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR) • Lee County concurrency analysis • Collier MPO origin and destination study • RITIS • FDOT Lee and Collier mobility profiles • Crash analysis from the Lee and Collier MPO's High Injury Network (HIN) analysis as part of the SS4A projects. FDOT HIN analysis on state roads in Lee County • Travel time data from BlueTOAD sensors and other sources • Transit ridership, operational and coverage information from the TDP's and other recent studies • Corridor and intersection analysis included in the 1-75 Master Plan This task will include conducting a regional origin and destination study focusing on peak hour commuter traffic between Lee and Collier Counties. The breakdown of trips will be by community/planning district and the analysis should be by one of the big data sources that is commonly used. The two MPO's are open to recommendations as to what is used but also how this data can be checked for accuracy as well. The origin and destination data will be used to recommend improvements and strategies. Also as part of this task, the Consultant will develop a process to classify and address congestion and recommend an updated toolbox of projects and CMP Strategies to 3 1 P a g e Page 82 of 184 address recurring and non -recurring congestion. The updated toolbox of projects and strategies should include generalized information on costs of implementation. Deliverables: • Corridor level travel condition summaries • Identification of Intersection hot spots and bottlenecks • Peal hour commuter origin and destination data between Lee and Collier counties • Updated toolbox of projects and strategies to improve recurring and non -recurring congestion with generalized cost data Task 5: Analyze Conditions and Develop Recommended Projects and Strategies for Potential Implementation by the MPO's Using what comes out of task 4, as well as the toolbox of Congestion Management Process strategies, identify specific projects and strategies that will help reduce congestion on roadways and at intersections for implementation. This task will include developing an implementation schedule (short term, mid-term and long term), implementation responsibilities and costs at a planning level cost estimate. The recommended projects and strategies should include a mix of the following: • Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) • Transportation Demand Management (TDM) • Operational improvements • Capacity expansion • Transit improvements • Commuter services and van pools • Technological improvements • Bicycle/pedestrian and micromobility improvements The identification of projects should include where the proposed fix needs further study and include that cost and responsibility for that analysis as well. Deliverables: • Identification of site specific projects and strategies to address congested locations with schedule, responsibility and planning level cost estimates 4 1 P a g e Page 83 of 184 TASK 6: Develop a Prioritization Process to Identify a Prioritized List of Projects and Strategies for Implementation The Consultant will, with the help of the MPO staff, identify the distinct types and amount of funding that is currently available to the MPOs for programming projects and strategies. The Consultant will develop a prioritization process with the input of the MPO staff and MPO committees to develop a list of prioritized projects to be included in the LRTP update for implementation. Deliverables: • Identification of available funding for projects and strategies and prioritization process • List of prioritized projects, strategies and recommendations for both MPOs TASK 7: Monitoring Strategy Effectiveness This Task will address the monitoring of the effectiveness of strategies and projects that are implemented. As part of this task, the Consultant will review the MPO's processes and provisions to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the CMP strategies and projects that have been implemented to address congestion, and recommend ways to improve these provisions. Deliverables: • Technical Memorandum on findings and recommendations to improve and enhance the MPO's current practices to monitor the effectiveness of implemented strategies and recommendations. Task 8: Public Involvement and MPO Committee Presentations The Consultant will participate in the public involvement meetings that take place as part of the development of the Long Range Plan. In addition the Consultant will make presentations (or provide materials for MPO staff to present) and seek input at the MPOs Congestion Management meetings, TAC, CAC and MPO Board as needed. The total number of meetings estimated as part of this task is sixteen over the project time frame. Deliverables: • Summary of comments and recommendations received as part of the public involvement activities 5 1 P a g e Page 84 of 184 Task 9: Develop the Draft and Final Congestion Management Elements Documentation This task will include pulling together the documentation that has been done in the previous tasks and developing the updated congestion management elements for the Lee and Collier MPO's for inclusion in their Long Range Plans. This will also include a separate regional technical memorandum that will be included in both MPO plans. The CMP elements will include the documentation of the deliverables identified in each of the project tasks. The Consultant will compile and present the first draft of the 2040 CMP Element to the MPO's Traffic Management and Operations Committee, Technical Advisory Committee, Citizens Advisory Committee and the MPO Board. A final version of the 2050 CMP Element will be completed after input from the public, staff and the committees. Deliverables: • Draft and final congestion management element documentation for inclusion on the 2050 LRTPs Schedule and Budget The Consultant will perform the scope tasks within twelve months of the Notice to Proceed. The budget for this project is $120,000 for the Lee MPO and $ 67,765 for the Collier MPO for FY2024/25. Collier MPO has an additional FY2025/26 allocation of $155,000 for the Congestion Management Process update, some of which can be applied toward this Regional Element, if necessary. 6 1 P a g e Page 85 of 184 �\ z ■ ::D -0 ui, • 89 ■ Jul � � � � $ � �� � \ � � &a� � � 4 ) _ CD Iq Z..4; 0 ul '6 CU cu LL 0 LL cu 0) W � 0 -0 0) q) E E W 2 mo c [2 CL 2 0) 0 CL � � | | � � � Page 86 of 184 Hendry County Alico Road Legend Lee County U.S. Census Urban Area Boundaries 2020 Collier County Immokalee Rd Gc •n -- Gale Estates - --- - __--- - --- - nn'- SO, pefoqf MF Y %b? _ _ _ Bigrypress _-__-- -_~ _ R i9 _ Bonita Springs -Estero Urban Area - Lee/Collier Regional CMP Study Area Page 87 of 184 2/14/2025 Item # 11.A ID# 2025-531 Executive Summary Safe Streets and Roads for All - Comprehensive Safety Action Plan Update and Presentation on Draft Existing Conditions and Safety Analysis Memorandum OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to be informed about the development of the Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP), ask questions of the consultant, TY Lin, and provide comments on the Draft Existing Conditions and Safety Analysis Memorandum. CONSIDERATIONS: TY Lin will give a presentation introducing the project objectives and timeline, existing conditions, comments received, the High Injury Network (HIN), and next steps followed by a question -and -answer session (Attachment 1). The draft Existing Conditions and Safety Analysis Memorandum is provided in Attachment 2. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: TY Lin gave a similar presentation to the Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee on October 15th and to the Technical and Citizens Advisory Committees on October 28th. The draft Memorandum incorporates revisions made in response to comments received from the advisory committees and the project's Steering Committee (Attachment 3). MPO staff has also provided regular updates on the CSAP to the Community Transportation Safety Team (CTST) and will continue to seek their input throughout the development of the Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: For the MPO Board to receive the presentation and provide comments to further the development of the Plan. PREPARED BY: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENTS: TY Lin Presentation Draft Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Steering Committee Roster Page 89 of 184 i N i N 0 � i f6 E E _0 V) V Q 0 Ln 0 E Z 0 w > V >, Ln z � °' D Ln a E a� E E N �,— X u w w = z N ryi U-i V U E 0 V C- O IA AL W m m O L T� U N M In C- N i O U 7 0 i � O a->1+ V .N V � N ate-J .y � iA O _ D +� U U in 0) cn a� Q N >, LL +.j Cn N O a_' O N Ln Q Q Q L t t 0 N 0) N (0 d 41 h Q E — E N m O E U H H IA p a EL L � V �a L A, 0 -P 'm a i OD N C M N O i rV O O � N E Q O O O 4-j N u +j 111Z +j O +j N N � N V a --+ \ i 4-0 'E - c6 �~ - N N O N p N o V) > O O � N O r- cv Ln � ( cn N u 1�0 u . _ N Ln Q > > X LnN (� L.L L Tit O �� V LA W V O L2 M N co O M N N N O m N O m N O C) l0 I� N lD CO Ol CO N N N O� o T '.0 o Ln m m Il- O V M V N V O rn r WA i IA i k W O " N � W � O \ / V VJ � o L_ O ^/ W o e L_ � W o w Im m W p a) a� V m C) � — V) V) o �a L �a zo X N � I U LU V V L.L •�cc -cc o 00 o I� m d H i 47 V = o O 47 N A m o 0 d) 0 o 0 O M � o 0 J a {A �L ++ O V a1 •i in v -le V \ Ln pl alLn C O1 •� -6 n t Q a) N Q O Ln n O Q- O N i V) °1 N � L a) -O > L a, 0 v�ni O in to L d O N > O L O1 O N cB 0 O1 pl L O O in C -O v v �n C - Fu E C v p O 0 O O c a) •�, � a� � a L c — v aU � v a a a n V � in _0 O 0- i m V }, N _0 >1 \ — _N C6 i, � N • V O N \ • 0i _ 4-j m \ N N 0) N cn ++ O N O) N \ v�i — a� O� N �� O V Ln a O �7 S �� NV 0- cn cn 0 0 }+ 0) N rn 0 0-0 cn u Q)� E S V N 0 H. a All s Z 0 w •� I U a 1'fi I �I� T� N \W � W }' N 4J N W tA 67 mF L C .N L V L O C O L C 0 L O am V) i 0 00 Ln 0 o N � C � (O V) N Vi � 3 V)Ln S � N 41 t v N u N N E Ln v co E (1) N c6 O � OLn �l C > O O O '+� Q E d Ln O c \o 0 9 \o 0 co M t N 0) _N � 0) O N O O i (6 O N E C C � O LA N N Q Ln Z 0 Vf uW r D i LU�/ I.T. EM a 0 • • • v co w 0 co rn N (0 d r f • • � •t _0 Ln* El u = � -1 Y L .2 O C �' � tr is lC Yap a &= Ala y' -- I- I W A' 00 a� a i aJ s H Y L —c `n 0-0 c('� _ �� V •� no 0 00 N " a-' _� V i u �� �N C m O- -c � O O� O M _ O Ln }, f6 —j "VoV 4J • � "-0 i �_ °'0`) S Z 3 E cn LL. u =Ns>, z0 tA 04- O H O V O L. � 00 0 o _o m d O V z O z S �a N O 4-j V C6 N V �O O N ca N � � � N � O w a� a- j u O +, U.)J N Vi � N o O V r Q N N O c� —j z C) -rz In V U- _ :;c ewe �• � ar. �' .t��zt�` �, �`- _ e T = .•+ ' -"# •++fir i� ^ :.. ... . �.._. '�'!r•_ - .: - ._. ? - . 1 j ti. __� Contents ExecutiveSummary....................................................................................................................................................3 PreviousPlans..............................................................................................................................................................5 PlanFindings...........................................................................................................................................................5 CrashTrends.................................................................................................................................................................8 Overall Crash Numbers — Including Interstate Crashes...........................................................................8 Overall Crash Numbers — Non -Interstate Crashes....................................................................................8 Neighboring Counties Fatality Comparison.............................................................................................13 Crashesby Mode................................................................................................................................................13 Crashesby Month and Season......................................................................................................................18 Crashesby Day & Time.................................................................................................................................... 20 CrashesBy Age of Victim................................................................................................................................. 22 Crashes by Driver Contributing Action....................................................................................................... 23 ParkingLot Crashes............................................................................................................................................ 24 SystemicAnalysis..................................................................................................................................................... 26 Crash Type Analysis (Motor Vehicle Crashes).......................................................................................... 26 High -Risk Features Analysis............................................................................................................................ 29 EquityConsiderations........................................................................................................................................ 34 HighInjury Network............................................................................................................................................... 38 Purpose................................................................................................................................................................... 38 Methodology........................................................................................................................................................ 38 Results..................................................................................................................................................................... 40 i mim- in I "IYUn Page 11 mOwLowER�via� �q 9a�aa�� Page 103 of 184 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Collier MPO has included safety goals in many preceding plans which reflect considerable thought, effort, and engagement. The previous plans are fundamental in shaping the Safety Action Plan, providing a foundation and areas for alignment. Collier County reported 929 killed or serious injury (KSI) crashes on their roadway network over a five-year period, averaging about 186 per year (152 serious injury crashes and 34 fatal crashes annually). These crashes resulted in 184 fatalities, averaging 36 traffic deaths per year, as summarized in Table 2. The number of KSI crashes dipped slightly in 2020, in contrast to nationwide trends, but have since surpassed 2019 levels, highlighting a troubling increase in traffic incidents and the urgent need for improved safety measures. Crash data reveals several patterns that provide a better understanding of traffic safety issues in Collier County: - Seasonality: More crashes occur in winter and spring, accounting for nearly 60% of all KSI crashes. Concurrently, over half of pedestrian and bicycle KSI crashes, 66%, occur in winter and spring. This contrasts national trends but aligns with the region's annual population fluctuations during these periods. - Age of Victim: In Collier County, individuals aged 20 to 30 are involved in the highest percentage of KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured) crashes, accounting for 24% despite representing only 9% of the population. Additionally, children and teens (0-19) are disproportionately affected in pedestrian and bicyclist KSI crashes, underscoring their vulnerability. - Contributing Factors: Based on the reported crash data, over half (65%) of all fatal and severe injury crashes are attributed to five main causes: failure to yield, roadway departure, reckless driving, disregarding traffic signals, and speeding. - Location: A large portion of crashes (25%) occur in parking lots. Parking lot locations accounted for 10% of all fatal and serious injury crashes for pedestrians and cyclists, which is disproportionately higher than for all road users (6%). A systemic analysis reveals the relative severity of different types of crashes and types of crash locations: - Crashes by Mode: Motor vehicle crashes account for the majority of all crashes and cause the most serious injuries and fatalities. However, non -motor vehicle crashes tend to be more severe when they occur. Pedestrians and cyclists account for only 4% of all crashes but represent 23% of all KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured) crashes. Motorcyclists are involved injust 1% of all crashes but makeup 14% of KSI crashes. For pedestrian crashes, 1 in every 10 results in a fatality or serious injury. For bicyclists, this figure is 1 in every 9 crashes, and for motorcyclists, it is 1 in every 4 crashes. In contrast, motor vehicle crashes result in a fatality or serious injury every 95 crashes. - Motor Vehicle Crash Types: While rear end, sideswipe, and other / non -collision crashes are the most common motor vehicle crash types, the most severe crash types are roll-over, head-on, left - turn, and ran -off roadway / fixed object crashes (where a motor vehicle strikes a parked car, tree, or other non-moving object). - Intersection Crashes: Risk was assessed for both urban and rural intersections. In urban areas, the relative risk for crashes and KSI (killed or serious injury) crashes is higher at high -volume intersections CM W-o "I, An Page 11 Page 104 of 184 with more lanes. However, the highest risk for pedestrian KSI crashes is at signalized intersections with 1 or 2 lanes and low average daily traffic (under 25,000 vehicles). All crash types are more frequent at intersections with 6 or more lanes, with the greatest risk at high -volume, non -signalized intersections with 6 or more lanes. At rural intersections, non -signalized rural intersections have a greater frequency of KSI crashes yet pedestrian and bicyclist crashes are uncommon at rural intersections. The highest risk for vehicle reported crashes were identified to be speed -related on 6+ lane signalized intersections and related to speed. Segment Crashes: Risk was assessed for both urban and rural roadway segments. On urban roadway segments, the relative risk for roadways with 1 or 2 lanes is consistently low, regardless of average daily vehicle traffic. In general, risk increases with the number of lanes and daily traffic: the risk of KSI crashes is greatest on 6+ lane segments with moderate Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) and of the crash types examined, all occur more frequently than average on 3 to 6+ lane roadway segments with moderate AADT. On rural roadway segments, the risk increases with the number of lanes, even though these roads typically have low average annual daily traffic (AADT) - Equity Assessment: Based on an equity score comprised of demographic and socio-economic factors, areas with a high equity need are overrepresented in the County's crashes and KSI crashes. Although containing only 3% of the county's roadway miles, 9% of KSI crashes occurred in the most disadvantaged communities. A high injury network (HIN), a set of roads and intersections with the highest rates of severe and fatal crashes determined by data analysis, was developed to support Collier MPO in prioritizing safety projects throughout the county. The HIN includes both intersection and segment locations and was developed based on three equally weighted criteria: Severe Crash Risk Score, Facility Risk Score, and Relative Risk Score. C - "MAn Page11 Page 105 of 184 PREVIOUS PLANS This conditions assessment started with a review of relevant past studies and plans that set safety goals impacting the region and future projects. The existing MPO plans and their goals demonstrate significant thought, effort, and engagement, forming the foundation for the Safety Action Plan and providing areas for alignment. Relevant excerpts from these resources are documented below. Several major themes emerged across the plans reviewed: • Increased safety of the transportation system for motorized and non -motorized users. • Safe, connected, efficient, and convenient mobility options including transit. • Accessibility for people walking and biking through investments in the built environment. • Equitable community input and inclusive transportation network outcomes. Overall, Collier MPO's existing plans reflect an intention for a Complete Streets approach where the design, management, operations, and maintenance of the County's streets and transportation systems reflect the needs of all users. These plans are guided by and optimized for broader social, economic, and environmental outcomes, rather than solely focusing on motor vehicle traffic. Plan Findings Below are excerpts from the reviewed plans. Plans that did not contain goals, priorities, or recommendations relevant to a Comprehensive Safety Action Plan have been omitted. "W'..'11111111W Local Roads Safety Plan (LRSP), May 2021 "The purpose is to prioritize opportunities to improve roadway safety on locally owned and maintained roadways in support of Florida Department of Transportation's Vision Zero goal of achieving zero fatalities and serious injuries Statewide." 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) • Goal #6: Increase the Safety of the Transportation System for Users ■ Reduce the number of fatalities, injuries, and crashes. • Ensure adequate bicycle and pedestrian facilities are incorporated into new highway and transit projects. ■ Implement safety -related improvements on high crash corridors. • Goal #7: Promote Multimodal Solutions ■ Improve frequency and reliability of public transit service routes and improve access to park -and -ride lots. ■ Improve pedestrian and bicycle facilities. ■ Implement Complete Streets policies. NOU "I, An Page 11 Page 106 of 184 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) The MPO and its partners prioritize projects listed in the TIP to enhance regional mobility and improve the safety, condition, and efficiency of the transportation system. The TIP includes projects for all transportation modes, including roadways, bicycle and pedestrian paths, transit, and aviation. Its development involves input from all transportation system users, including those traditionally underserved who may face challenges accessing employment and other services. The MPO's LRTP and TIP are developed with consideration of the ten planning factors from MAP-21 and the FAST Act, a selection of which are listed below. • Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non -motorized users. • Increase the security of the transportation system for the motorized and non -motorized users. • Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight. • Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight. • Enhance travel and tourism. FY22-24 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) The Florida Transportation Plan and the State's Strategic Highway Safety Plan prioritize safety, aiming for zero traffic fatalities and serious injuries. MPOs must demonstrate how their Long -Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and priority projects in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) contribute to these safety targets. The UPWP should consider enhancements to data analyses and community involvement to better inform the identification and prioritization of safety projects. Congestion Management Process (CMP), April 2022 The following Objectives were reviewed by the CMP and approved by the MPO Board to provide more specific guidance and direction in evaluating the CMP's performance measures and strategies. • Objective 1: Improve the safety of transportation facilities. • Objective 3: Develop, maintain, expand, and close gaps in pedestrian, bicycle, and shared -use path facility networks for efficient and safe movement of people. Connect these pedestrian and bicycle facilities to existing and future transit stops. • Objective 4: Reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by encouraging alternative modes of transportation, supporting sustainable land use development, and creating an integrated multimodal transportation system. • Objective 6: Promote transportation investments that support the LRTP's priorities, goals, and objectives. LRTP Goal #6: Increase the Safety of the Transportation System for Users; CMP-Related Objectives: o LRTP Goal #7: Promote Multi modal Solutions; CMP-Related Objectives: CHI "I, An Page 11 Page 107 of 184 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, March 2079 Vision: "To provide a safe and comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian network that promotes and encourages community use and enjoyment." This plan aims to provide a safe and comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian network that promotes and encourages community use and enjoyment. It builds on prior efforts to develop a first-class network throughout Collier County. It is not intended to duplicate or conflict with existing local plans and ongoing projects but rather to unify planning efforts and influence facility improvement priorities at the county level. Strategies and objectives of the plan includes: • Safety: Increase safety for people who walk and bicycle in Collier County. o Objectives: ■ Reduce the number and severity of bicycle crashes. ■ Reduce the number and severity of pedestrian crashes. o Strategies: ■ Identify high -crash locations for RSAs. Projects that implement recommendations identified in RSAs will be a high priority for funding. ■ Collaborate with law enforcement to develop and deploy enforcement/education campaigns. ■ Work with FDOT and law enforcement agencies to seek funding for High Visibility Enforcement (HVE) for pedestrian and bicycle safety. ■ Enhance the partnership with the Community Traffic Safety Team ■ Adopt a Complete Streets Policy and work with local governments and the County to develop and adopt their own Complete Streets policies. ■ Work with FDOT, MPO member entities, and other transportation agencies to reduce the number of crashes, particularly those with severe or fatal injuries Safety Performance Targets of Vision Zero Florida and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan: o Number of fatalities: 0 o Rate of fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles traveled (VMT): 0 o Number of serious injuries: 0 o Rate of serious injuries per 100 million VMT: 0 o Number of non -motorized fatalities and serious injuries: 0 One of the primary goals of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is to reduce the number of bicycle and pedestrian serious injuries and fatalities by funding projects that will support this goal. CHI "IYUn Page 11 Page 108 of 184 CRASH TRENDS Unless otherwise noted, all crash analyses were done using crash data from the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (FLHSMV), queried via Signal Four Analytics for the years 2019-2023. All crashes marked as Interstate were removed for analysis, so crashes along 1-75 will not be included. Crash data only includes reported crashes that meet the state's definition of a crash. Throughout the analysis, the term KSI crash describes crashes resulting in fatalities or serious injuries. Overall Crash Numbers — Including Interstate Crashes From 2019 through 2023, Collier County experienced over 60,000 traffic crashes and over 1,000 fatal or serious injury crashes (Table 1). 2023 peaked with 13,399 total crashes and 253 fatal or serious injury crashes. Although there was a decrease in fatal and serious injury crashes (KSI) between 2019 and 2020, the numbers have been steadily increasing since then. These figures include Interstate crashes, which are excluded from the subsequent sections of this report. Interstates have been left out of the remainder of the crash analysis due to differences in jurisdiction, traffic volumes, and the scope of countermeasures and strategies. 13,399 253 60,228 1,054 Table 1. Total crashes and total fatal and serious injury crashes in Collier County from 2019-2023, including interstate crashes. V � Overall Crash Numbers — Non -Interstate Crashes Excluding Interstate crashes, Collier County saw just over 57,000 crashes between 2019 and 2023 (Table 2). Of those, 929 were serious or fatal injury crashes. This equates to an average of 11,401 crashes, 152 serious injury crashes, and 34 fatal crashes per year. Once again, both crashes and KSI crashes decreased below 2019 levels, but have been steadily increasing since. 11,410 216 9,395 137 11,494 172 12,236 186 12,470 218 57,005 929 Table 2. Total crashes and total fatal and serious injury crashes in Collier County from 2019-2023, excluding interstate crashes. Examining serious injury and fatal crashes more closely (Table 3), both fatal and serious injury crashes follow similar trends with a decrease in 2020 from the 2019 level and increases since. Serious injury crashes peaked at 184 in 2023, and fatal crashes peaked at 35 in 2022. NOU "I, An Page 11 Page 109 of 184 151 184 _ .. • 759 Table 3. Total fatal and serious injury crashes in Collier County from 2019-2023. Table 4 and Table 5 summarize non -interstate crashes for three major cities in Collier County, highlighting the total number of crashes and those resulting in fatal or serious injuries. Between 2019 and 2023, the City of Naples accounted for 4,199 crashes, representing 7% of the county's total crashes. However, these crashes were more severe, making up 11% of the county's KSI crashes. Meanwhile, the City of Marco Island experienced 943 crashes, constituting 2% of the total crashes. Of these, 24 were KSI crashes. The City of Everglades reported 43 crashes, representing less than 1 % of the county's total. City of Naples 19,315 4,199 104 City of Marco Island 1 15,942 943 24 City of Everglades 143 43 Jn 3 • 27,753 3,220 82 Table 4. Total crashes and total fatal and serious injury crashes within Major Cities from 2079-2023, excluding interstate crashes. Table 5. Total fatal and serious injury crashes within Major Cities from 2079-2023. C"IY iln Page 11 CID Page 110 of 184 Figure 1 shows a heatmap of crash locations, which are most dense in the city of Naples, Marco Island, and Immokalee, consistent with population centers. C'IYUn Page 111 of 184 00 O N N LL shin RdCL 2 i U E^ i7V 5 sF a Z Z �,rpert Rd N N T � i O wO Nmpp� _ � Z * Oi�`-____. ._. ,qU e l7 U 3 J r,, _--_- -- ---- ---- - - - --, lle.- -- ---------- - - - - -- -- v z;;z Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP As a result of these crashes, there have been 184 fatalities in Collier County associated with traffic crashes from 2019-2023, or an average of 36 traffic fatalities per year (Figure 2). Likewise, there were 968 individuals that were seriously injured from a crash, with an average of 193 annually. Following crash data trends, both fatalities and serious injuries saw a dip from 2019-2020, followed by a steady increase to 2023. Fatalities saw a peak in 2019 at 43 deaths, and serious injuries saw a peak in 2023 at 246. People Seriously Injured or Killed (2019-2023) 300 268 284 250 210 227 200 163 150 100 50 � - 0 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 ■ Fatalities 43 32 35 36 38 ■ Serious Injuries 225 131 175 191 246 Figure 2. People seriously injured or killed in traffic crashes in Collier County from 2079-2023. 'A� I M A W*4 & N.R.U'IYUn Page 113 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP Neighboring Counties Fatality Comparison The following analysis includes a comparison with neighboring counties for fatal crash records from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). Based on the limitations of the FARS data query tool, the data do not filter out the fatal crashes on interstates. The most recent available data is for the period 2019-2022, resulting in this section not perfectly aligned with the timeframe used in the previous and preceding sections. Compared to overall state levels and several neighboring counties, Collier County has one of the lowest traffic fatality rates at 0.46 fatalities per 1,000 people (Table 6). This rate is lower than Florida's average of 0.63 but only slightly lower than Miami -Dade County's rate of 0.47. Collier County's traffic fatality rate is similar to neighboring Lee and Broward Counties, both of which have rates just over 0.5 per 1,000 people. 178 380,221 0.46 456 772,902 0.58 60 39,902 1.50 1,049 1,940,907 0.54 1,267 2,688,237 0.47 13,785 21,634,529 0.63 Table 6. Collier County traffic fatalities per 7,000 people compared to peer counties Naples, the largest city in Collier County, had a traffic fatality rate of 0.36 per 1,000 people, lower than other large cities like Fort Myers, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami, which all had rates above 0.5 (Table 7). 7 19,315 0.36 70 88,699 0.78 177 182,673 0.96 259 443,665 0.58 Table 7. City of Naples traffic fatalities per 7,000 compared to peer cities Crashes by Mode Between 2019-2023, an average of 21 pedestrian, 22 cyclist, 28 motorcyclist, and 160 motorist fatalities or serious injuries occur from crashes every year in Collier County. Of the 184 fatalities in the county over this period, most were motorists (112), followed by motorcyclists (30), and pedestrians and cyclists (21 each). On average per year, this breaks down to 22.4 motorist fatalities, 6 motorcyclist fatalities, and 4.2 fatalities each for pedestrians and cyclists. Vulnerable Road Users are individuals at a higher risk of injury or fatality in the event of a traffic crash due to their lack of physical protection compared to vehicle occupants. These includes pedestrians, cyclists, motorcyclists, users of personal mobility devices (such as scooters), and other non -motorized road users. N.R.U'IYI.in Page 114 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP People Killed or Seriously Injured Since 2019, by Mode 200 0 0 180 22 30 160 140 21 21 120 0 100 80 60 ® m ®m 40 5 ®m M ®®5 ® 5 4 4 m®m mm 6 5 5 3 20 4 3 7 4 4 IMI . 1 0 1111 r�D w 0 0 (D w 0 0 (D w 0 0 (D w 0 0 (D n 0- � o o o- o o o- o o o- o 0 0_ '< 0 0 O O (DO O (DO O (DE O O (DO O v n m v n (DD v n (DD v n r(D v n r<D n n n n n m m (D rD m 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 ■ Serious Injuries _ Fatalities Figure 3. Total fatalities and serious injuries in Collier County from 2019-2023, by mode (pedestrian, bicycle, motorcycle, and motor vehicle). Fatal and serious injuries decreased across most transportation modes from 2019 to 2020, then increased from 2021 to 2023, reaching or surpassing 2019 levels. For example, the number of pedestrians seriously injured fell from 32 to 10, then rose to 21 by 2023. Motorists seriously injured dropped from 160 to 96, then increased to 170 by 2023. While the serious injuries among cyclists and motorcyclists exceeded 2019 levels, rising from 22 to 31 and 24 to 40, respectively. Calculating crash severity shows how severe crashes are for different types of transportation compared to how often they happen. Table 8 Table 8. Total percentage of crashes, total percentage of KSI crashes, and relative severity of crashes in Collier County from 2019-2023, by mode involved (pedestrian, bicycle, motorcycle, and motor vehicle).shows the percentage of total crashes and KSI crashes for each mode from 'IYUn r Page 115 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP 2019-2023. The relative severity score indicates how much more frequent severe crashes are for a specific mode. For example, a pedestrian severity score of 6.1 means severe pedestrian crashes are 6.1 times more common than expected based on the total number of crashes. From 2019-2023, motorist involved crashes made up 95% of all crashes and 63% of the most severe (KSI) crashes. The remaining KSI crashes were fairly evenly split among pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcyclists, even though these groups account for only 5% of all crashes. The relative severity is the ratio of the percent of KSI crashes to the percent of crashes; where the relative severity exceeds 1, KSI are overrepresented for that crash type relative to the number of crashes that occur. The relative severity shows that while crashes involving pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcyclists are less common, they tend to be much more severe. This is especially true for motorcyclists, who are involved in just 1% of all crashes but account for 14% of KSI crashes. Pedestrians and cyclists each account for 2% of all crashes, but pedestrians make up 11% of severe (KSI) crashes, and cyclists 12%. Together, these two groups representjust 4% of all crashes but 23% of all KSI crashes. Figure 4 shows crashes and corresponding KSI crashes by mode involved. Table 8. Total percentage of crashes, total percentage of KSI crashes, and relative severity of crashes in Collier County from 2019-2023, by mode involved (pedestrian, bicycle, motorcycle, and motor vehicle). Imli, Aff*406' Share of Total Crashes Share of KSI Crashes by Mode Pedestrian 2% rcycle Motor Vehi 95% Motor Vehid 63% estrian 11% Bicycle 12% :)rcycle 4% Figure 4. Share of total crashes by mode involved (left) and corresponding share of KSI crashes by mode (right). For pedestrian crashes, 1 in every 10 crashes leads to a fatality or serious injury. For cyclists, this number is just 1 in every 9 crashes and for motorcyclists 1 in every 4 crashes. Motor vehicle crashes, by contrast, result in a fatal or serious injury every 95 crashes. Figure 5 shows the density maps of pedestrian and bicycle, or non -motorized crashes at county level as well as the more detailed maps for municipalities. ROU 'IYIAn Page 116 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP One fatality or serious injury occurs every... 95 Motor Vehicle - Involved crashes Pedestrian - Involved crashes 00ro 9 Cyclist - Involved crashes Motorcycle - Involved crashes NR.0 'IYUn Page 117 of 184 It 00 O OD Q 00 V) a- Oz V A) + V V rr 8u 4 6 / ram m 0. a @ O w a V V 7cU 1t eM ary4, to Kert m� ou ��cl s w 9, O E Awwli Rd � ma S i,l r J I,` J� >TH•15.416 t� a � ,�•`�-]� f s r_ * Zm5 _ _ � a w m3 II •'.'i i U V7 Y Q v _ cn Ja) a 00 0 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP Crashes by Month and Season Examining the months and seasons when crashes occur helps to understand how environmental factors like weather, temperature, daylight, and road conditions affect crash rates and influence travel behavior in Collier County. This analysis looked at the average KSI (killed or seriously injured) crashes for all months from 2019- 2023 and the seasons in which these crashes occurred, as well as all bike and pedestrian KSI crashes: - Winter: December*, January, and February (*includes the December of the previous calendar year) - Spring: March, April, and May - Summer: June, July, and August - Fall: September, October, and November Overall KSI Crashes by Month The number of fatal or serious injury crashes in Collier County varies by month, with a monthly average of 14.8 fatal or seriously injury crashes per month from 2019-2023 (Figure 6). There was a notable dip in the average in August to 9.5 KSI crashes and an increase in December to 18.75 KSI crashes. Likewise, March and May saw above average crashes where people were killed or seriously injured, at 17.75 and 16.5, respectively. 20 15 _.� --- --- --- --- — -- 14.8 10 5 0 Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 5-yrAverage Mk 1111111111111k Figure 6. Average fatal or serious injury crashes by month in Collier County from 2079-2023. On average, 44.4 KSI crashes occur in Collier County each season. Summer and fall have fewer KSI crashes, while winter and spring see significant increases, with spring reaching as high as 51.3 (Table 9). Together, winter and spring account for nearly 60% of all KSI crashes during this period (Figure 7). This aligns with the annual population increases to the region during these periods. Table 9. Average fatal and serious injury crashes per season in Collier County from 2079-2023. ■ Winter ■ Spring ■ Summer ■ Fall Figure 7. Percent share of fatal and serious injury crashes by season in Collier County from 2019-2023. ROU 'IYIAn Page 119 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP Bicycle and Pedestrian KSI Crashes by Month There is an average of 3.3 pedestrian and cyclist KSI crashes per month in Collier County from 2019 to 2023. The winter months, especially December, February, and March, see the highest numbers, with March and December averaging up to six crashes (Figure 8). KSI crashes drop below average during the summer months of June, July, and August. 6 5 4 3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.3 2 1 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 5-yrAverage Figure 8. Total bicycle and pedestrian fatal or serious injury crashes by month in Collier County from 2019-2023. Seasonal data shows more fatal or serious injury bicycle and pedestrian crashes in winter and spring, with both seasons averaging 12.5 crashes, higher than the average of 9.7 (Table 10). The largest share, 66%, of pedestrian and bicycle KSI crashes occur in winter or spring (Figure 9). Again, these crash patterns align with the annual population increases to the region during these periods. They may also align to more moderate temperatures more suitable for walking and biking. Table 70. Average pedestrian and cyclist fatal and serious injury crashes per season in Collier County from 2079-2023. ■ Winter ■ Spring ■ Summer ■ Fall Figure 9. Percent share of pedestrian and cyclist fatal and serious injury crashes by season in Collier County from 2079-2023 ROU 'IYIAn Page 120 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP Crashes by Day & Time Temporal crash trends show how the frequency and severity of traffic incidents vary over time. In addition to analyzing patterns by season, examining time of day, and day of the week can identify risk factors and help improve road safety. This section examines temporal trends for all KSI crashes and those involving cyclists and pedestrians. Overall KSI Crashes by Day & Time Time of Day: For all KSI crashes, 39% occurred between 2 pm and 7 pm, with 4 pm each seeing the highest share of KSI crashes at 8%. Day of Week: KSI crashes are spread somewhat evenly across all days of the week, with 70% occurring on weekdays vs. 30% on weekends. Table 11 shows the total KSI crashes by both time of day and day of week for the time period. Hour Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Total 12 AM 5 2 2 6 0 3 8 26 1 AM 4 2 4 4 1 6 3 24 2 AM 3 2 3 2 0 6 9 25 3AM 0 3 0 0 0 3 4 10 4AM 2 1 2 0 1 1 2 9 5 AM 2 1 3 3 3 3 1 16 6 AM 4 4 3 5 7 3 1 27 7 AM 7 8 4 3 4 0 4 30 8 AM 2 3 3 2 6 5 2 23 9 AM 5 6 5 10 8 10 3 47 10 AM 7 4 4 6 6 2 3 32 11 AM 6 6 8 2 4 4 7 37 12 PM 5 8 8 10 11 8 10 60 1PM 6 3 5 9 6 7 4 40 2 PM 10 7 6 9 7 11 6 56 3 PM 6 7 12 12 7 10 6 60 4 PM 11 10 1 7 10 9 11 14 72 5 PM 5 5 11 7 5 11 61 6 PM 9 11 15 7 10 8 7 67 7PM 8 8 5 8 7 6 6 48 8PM 2 8 6 8 6 9 6 45 9PM 6 2 4 8 7 9 7 43 10 PM 4 5 0 7 10 7 4 37 11 PM 2 2 6 6 9 4 31 Total 121 130 116 148 133 146 132 926 13% 14% 13% 16% 14% 16% 14% Table 11. Total KSI crashes by time of day and day of week in Collier County from 2079-2023. 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 2% 3% 3% 2% 5% 3% 4% 6% 4% 6% 6% 8% 7% 7% 5% 5% 5% 4% 3% 'IYUn Pu� Page 121 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP Bicycle & Pedestrian KSI Crashes by Day & Time Time of Day: Bicycle and pedestrian KSI crashes are evenly spread throughout the entire day with 70% occurring from 7 am — 7 pm. However, evening and late night (8pm-3am) still account for 25% of severe bicycle and pedestrian crashes. Day of Week: For cyclists and pedestrians, 71 % of KSI crashes occur on weekdays. Monday and Sunday see peaks in KSI crashes at 18% and 16% respectively, while all other days see 13%. Table 12 shows the total bicycle and pedestrian KSI crashes by both time of day and day of week for the time period. Hour Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Total 12 AM 1 0 0 1 0 1 6 1 AM 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 4 2AM 0 0 1 0 0 3 2 6 3AM 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 4AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 04 1 5AM 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 5 6AM 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 6 7 AM 4 3 3 2 1 0 2 15 8AM 2 1 2 0 1 1 0 7 9AM 3 1 3 1 1 4 0 13 10 AM 5 1 1 1 3 0 2 13 11 AM 0 2 1 1 2 1 3 10 12 PM 2 3 3 3 1 2 2 16 1PM 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 8 2PM 3 1 1 2 1 0 8 3PM 3 1 1 3 1 9 4PM 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 9 5 PM 3 2 2 1 1 4 13 6 PM 2 3 4 0 2 1 2 14 7PM 2 1 1 2 1 0 13 8 PM 0 1 2 2 3 3 1 12 9PM 2 0 0 4 0 1 2 2 10 10 PM 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 4 11PM 1 0 1 1 8 Total 39 28 28 28 28 34 27 212 18% 13% 13% 13% 13% 16% 13% Table 72. Total bicycle and pedestrian KSI crashes by time of day and day of week in Collier County from 2079-2023. 3% 2% 3% 1% 0% 2% 3% 7% 3% 6% 6% 5% 8% 4% 4% 4% 4% 6% 7% 6% 6% 5% 2% 4% XP,U 'IYIAn Page 122 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP Crashes By Age of Victim In Collier County, the largest share of KSI crashes (24%) involves the age cohort 20 to 30 years old. This age group consists of the most drivers killed or seriously injured in crashes, despite only making up 9% of Collier County"s population. Drivers of other age groups represent between 12%-15% of KSI victims. Collectively, 20-40 year old drivers account for 39% of victims, while only making up 19% of the population. Figure 10 compares KSI victim driver age (left) to share of the population (right). KSI Victim Driver Age 0 to 19 20 to 30 30 to 39 0 LD 40 to 49 ' a, 0) Q 50 to 59 60 to 69 70 plus Collier County 2020 Population 0 to 19 20 to 30 30 to 39 0 0 40to49 a� Q 50 to 59 60 to 69 70 plus Figure 70. Age distribution of drivers killed or seriously injured in crashes in Collier County from 2079-2023 (left) and age distribution of the total population of Collier County in 2020 from the 2020 American Community Survey (right). When examining the ages of pedestrians and cyclists killed or seriously injured in crashes, younger age groups are more prominent. Despite the age cohort of 0-19 years making up only 19% of the population, this age group accounts for 27% of pedestrian and 21% of cyclist KSI victims (Figure 11). While children and teens constitute the largest share of KSI victims, younger adults and middle-aged residents tend to follow as a large share of victims. For both pedestrians and cyclists, the second highest victim age group is 40-49 year olds at 19%, though these individuals only make up 10% of the population in Collier County. Likewise, the ages of 20-29 and 30-39 make up a significant number of victims, representing 26% for pedestrian and 33% of cyclists. Pedestrian Victim Age for KSI Crashes 1 to 19 Z7% 20 to 29 12% 30 to 39 14% 40 to -• 19% 50 to 59 14% .0 to.• 5% 70 plus 10% Cyclist Victim Age for KSI Crashes 0 to 19 20 to 30 fl- 30 to 39 0 0 40 to 49 a� Q 50 to 59 .1 to .• 13% 0 plus3% Figure 11. Age distribution of pedestrian (left) and cyclist victims (right) of KSI crashes in Collier County from 2019-2023. "IYUn Page 122 mOwLowER�via� �q 9 �a�� Page 123 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP Crashes by Driver Contributing Action The actions of drivers that contribute to a crash, as reported by law enforcement, are the most significant factors leading to the crash for each driver involved. These causes are determined by the officer at the scene and may include multiple contributing factors per crash. In Collier County, 65% of all fatal and severe injury crashes result from five primary causes: failure to yield, disregarding traffic signals, speeding, reckless driving, and roadway departure. Reckless driving (24%), failure to yield (18%), and roadway departure (12%) represent the highest shares of contributing actions (Table 13). Table 73. Primary contributing action of crashes in Collier County. Note that 65% represents the share of the sum of these factors against total KSI crashes. These five factors will not sum to 65% due to crashes having multiple reported contributing actions. 1 Reckless driving: A driver who exhibited any two of the following behaviors: Failed to Yield Right of Way (code 3), Followed Too Closely (code 10), Ran Red Light (code 11), Ran Stop Sign (code 13), Improper Passing (code 15), Failed to Keep in Proper Lane (code 25), Disregarded Other Traffic Sign (code 27), or Disregarded Other Road Markings (code 28). More Information and definitions on other contributing actions can be found on: https://signal4analytics.com/assets/files/S4 Data Dictionary_.pdf ��u`u` - "I, An Page 123 mOwLowE,.. P_ _ Page 124 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP 65% of all fatal and serious injury crashes between 2019 and 2023 Parking Lot Crashes Reckless Driving- Improper/Unsafe Lane Usage Failure to Yield Disregarding Traffic Signs & Signals Roadway Departure Speeding Failure to Reduce Speed In Collier County a quarter of all crashes took place in parking lots from 2019-2023, but comprise a relatively low percentage of KSI crashes at 6%. Table 14 details the share of crashes, serious crashes, fatal crashes, and combined KSI crashes in parking lots for all modes. Table 74. Crashes by location for all road users from 2079-2023, including all locations, parking lot locations and percent of crashes in parking lots. Comparatively, parking lots make up a third of crash locations for bicycle and pedestrian crashes. These user types see greater percentages of serious or fatal injury crashes in parking lots, with 11 % of serious injury and 7% of fatal crashes occurring in parking lots. Together, parking lot locations accounted for 10% of all fatal and serious injury crashes for pedestrians and bicyclists, which is disproportionately higher than "MAn Page 124 Page 125 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP for all road users (6%). Table 15 details the share of crashes, serious crashes, fatal crashes, and combined KSI crashes in parking lots involving bicycles and pedestrians. Table 15. Crashes by location for bicycle and pedestrians from 2019-2023, including all locations, parking lot locations and percent of crashes in parking lots. y R 'IYI.in Page 125 Page 126 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP SYSTEMIC ANALYSIS The systemic analysis assesses the relative severity of different types of crashes and types of crash locations. This is helpful, as location prioritization should not just look at where crashes and KSI crashes have occurred, but the types of places in which crashes and KSI crashes commonly occur. The relative severity is the ratio of the percent of KSI crashes to the percent of crashes; where the relative severity exceeds 1, KSI are overrepresented for that crash type relative to the number of crashes that occur. Crash Type Analysis (Motor Vehicle Crashes) Understanding which crash types occur most often, as well as which crash types most often result in fatalities and serious injuries is critical for developing effective safety countermeasures. Between 2019-2023 the most common crash type was rear end, representing 34% of all crashes and 15% of all KSI crashes. Sideswipe and other / non -collision crashes make up the second largest share at 12% and 27%, respectively. However, for KSI crashes specifically, ran off roadway / fixed object crashes represented the highest share of KSI crashes at 19%. This was followed by left turn, rear end, and pedestrian crashes. In addition to share of crashes and KSI crashes, Table 16 includes a measure of relative severity, which helps demonstrate the crash types share of severe crashes relative to its share of total crashes. Crash Type 2 Share Crashes Share KS1W 1 Relative Left Turn 7% Crashes., 17% Severity 2.5 Angle 6% 8% 1.3 Rear End 34% 15% 0.4 Right turn 2% 2% 0.9 Ran off Roadway/Fixed Object 9% 19% 2.3 Head On 1% 6% 5.8 Rollover 0% 5% 10.9 Sideswipe 12% 4% 0.4 Other/ Non -Collision 27% 2% 0.1 Animal 1% 0% 0.3 Table 76. Table of crash types (organized by category) and their share of total crashes, KSI crashes, and relative severity in Collier County from 2079-2023. Analyzing these findings through the lenses of frequency and severity can pinpoint which types of crashes require the most urgent attention for safety interventions. Several key findings can be understood from Table 16: - Intersection / Access Management: - Rear end crashes are common but tend to be less severe when they occur. - Left turn and angle crashes, while only moderately common, tend to be more severe when they occur. 2 Definitions and graphical illustrations of each crash type can be found on https://signal4analytics.com/assets/files/S4 Data Dictionary_.pdf N.1EROU"I, An Page 126 �via� Page 127 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP - Right turn crashes are less common and less severe. - Lane Departure: - Sideswipe crashes are more common, but tend to be less severe when they occur. - Ran off roadway / fixed object crashes represent 9% off all crashes but 19% of KSI crashes, tending to be more severe when they occur. - Both head on and rollover crashes are rare, representing less than 2% of all crashes combined, but these crash types tend to be very severe when they occur. - Other: - While other / non -collision crashes are relatively frequent, they tend to not be very severe. Different crash types may also tend to be more prevalent in different contexts and environments. For example, the distribution of angle, left turning, and ran off roadway/fixed object KSI crashes in Figure 12, Figure 13, and Figure 14, demonstrates a relatively higher concentration of angle and left turn crashes in urban areas. In contrast, ran off roadway/fixed object crashes show more evenly distribution across both urban and rural parts of the county. Figure 72. Crash Density Heat Map: Angle K51 Crashes Imnrokalee -- - - - -- -- - - -- - - w -- pi. N /, OTti� i2 Mlles go City �- ------------- Legend Angle K5I crash Density .Sparse Dense p E can Nap _ Neplesi Ere iare �A i'Ie� � '\iF. csarwm�Yi. _ " f Everglades City, _ Plantation Island, o as i Mias. d gas i, oy�,�w,� Chokoloskee, and City of Napless„- .� ', Copeland , CM R 'IYU n PageI- Page 128 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP Figure 13. Crash Density Heat Map: Left Turn KSI Crashes GImmu miss • W-------------. • iM s City of Marco! Island • a $ Z �.a,;ra.. • s Fo i Iela!M ali.. �r F=�er a•,e Easi Nap ULV • Legend r Left Turn KSI Crash�A Density -•• «,•• • . Sparse ' Everglades City, N Dense - Plantation Island, A s s as 1 a,mzazozs o os Minn. ff `aIM a�,M�.. Cskee, and �s City of Naples Copeland Figure 74. Crash Density Heat Map: Ran off Roadway/Fixed Object KSI Crashes • - • rmmnkalea `' � �� � �� � � 00 -- 0.. ! •� • -- --- -- w.�,...e. .� W n, a oe• i• o s � nue, 'City of Marco Island. ' • `� • �' a Ao�x Green �c t ti Ian ` a f"161 AVv LaSL NAP V No - .. ! 1 w E rRl dg City -------------- Legend Ran Off Roadwayl 1 Fixed Dhject KSr too ,. Crash Density Everglades City, . Sparse . \ Plantation Island. N DenSe - Chokoloskee, and 0 3 B '12Milea 0 OS 1M1 A fl,: n5 1�k� City Naples - Copeland "IYUn Page 1 2g MO�LIER oar � via����e o,ee��=aeon Page 129 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP High -Risk Features Analysis The following sections summarize the likelihood of different intersection and roadway segment types resulting in a crash, serious injury, or fatality. By conducting this systemic analysis, the county can prioritize which locations should be prioritized for future investment. This analysis is conducted using relative risk scores; any value over 1 indicates an above -average risk for that feature. For the segment systemic analysis, all non -Interstate roadways found in the FDOT GIS Data Portal were included. For the intersection systemic analysis, all intersections where segments met were included, along with all signal locations identified using Open Streets Map. Local street classifications were omitted from this analysis due to data limitations on local street features such as number of lanes and Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT). Intersections This section provides an overview of crash data at both rural and urban intersections in Collier County, examining intersection characteristics such as signalization, number of lanes among intersection legs, and the AADT type. The relative risk is calculated for key metrics such as overall crashes, KSI crashes, and various crash types identified as both high -risk and high -frequency in the Crash Type Analysis. Those with greater frequency, or risk ratios greater than 1, are highlighted in red. While all intersection types are included in the analysis to ensure a complete dataset, trends from those with less than 4 intersections are excluded from this highlight due to low sample size. Urban Intersection 1K Table 17 shows the relative risk of key metrics for urban intersections for the crash category and across intersection typologies. On urban roadways in the county, the relative risk of different crashes varies across intersection type: - The relative risk for crashes and KSI crashes tends to be higher at high -volume intersections with a greater number of lanes. This is true at both signalized and non -signalized locations, but highest at non -signalized intersections. - There is an above -average risk of pedestrian and cyclist crashes at 6+ lane, high -volume intersections (both signalized and non -signalized) - However, the highest risk for pedestrian KSI crashes (5.5) is at signalized 1 or 2 lane intersection with low AADT. The highest risk for cyclist KSI crashes is 6 or more lane intersections with moderate to high AADT. - Of the crash types examined, all are more frequent at intersections with 6+ lanes. The greatest risk occurs at 6+ lane, high -volume, non -signalized intersections. NOU "MAn Page 129 Page 130 of 184 O O O O OR OR O O o m o o o o o O N lD N I� ri O r-I ri C1 lfl 00 r**� N I* O O O O 1-1 0 ,:� U1 O Izi: O N O O O O O rI -1 O O IZ:J: O r-I r-I ;t r-I r-I O Lq cA O O N rA r-I O N � Y � u sJljs ,laj7vjvg3 u0147asla4ul U [A m O RO O cM O N O r1 :? O O Z) O O :? O O lO 0 N O O 0 1n o m O O O O 111 � M N r-I N O0 o ri N .I r-I c I OO N r,*� O O O DD � n O O O M ri CO r-I r-, il In N c-I 41 N M M O r-I I O M O O O O O O 00 M 00 r-I r-1 N M O r1 O O N Y C N v .2 C v a ? 'O .E2 v ; m a U1 41 u CL m J p= tt:: v d O C N CL )ISly aAliDlay 0 00 r- 0 r- cM r- N � O (0 4, a a Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP Rural Intersections Table 18 shows the relative risk of key metrics for rural intersections for the crash category and across intersection typologies. In rural roadways in the county, the relative risk of different crashes varies across intersection type: - Overall, non -signalized rural intersections have a greater frequency of KSI crashes. 1 or 2 lane non -signalized intersections are nearly 2 times (1.8) riskier than the average rural intersection. - Signalized rural intersections have less frequent KSI crashes, but a greater risk for crashes in general. The relative risk for a crash is greatest (1.S) for rural signalized roadways involving 6+ lanes. - Of the crash types examined, the highest risk of left turn crashes is at 6+ lane signalized intersections, while ran off roadway risk is found to be higher at unsignalized intersections. - Among crashes marked as speed -related, 6+ lane signalized intersections were found to have the highest risk. - Pedestrian and cyclist crashes are uncommon at rural intersections. KSI 1.8 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.4 Crash 0.7 ----- Pedestrian KSI 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4C Pedestrian 0.0 cc Qj Bicycle KSI 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 *� a Bicycle " 0 0.0 v Left Turn 0.9 4.3 1.4 " " 0.0 1.3 Angle 0.4 0.3 0.4 Ran off Roadway 1.1 .3 0.6 0.3 0.8 Speed -Related 0.7 -_r 0.0 2.4 Table 18. Relative risk of crashes per intersection on rural roadways. 1 'IYUn Me� ER oa 9 =a.o Page 132 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP Segments Following the methodology and format of the intersections analysis, the tables below present a systemic analysis of urban and rural road segments in Collier County, focusing on crash types and severity across different lane types and Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) categories. Relative risk is calculated per lane mile and for key metrics such as overall crashes, KSI crashes, and various crash types identified as both high -risk and high -frequency in the Crash Type Analysis. Those with greater frequency, or risk ratios greater than 1, are highlighted in red. Urban Segments Table 19 shows the relative risk of key metrics for urban roadways - for the crash category and across segment typologies. Those with greater frequency, or risk ratios, are highlighted in red. - On urban segments, relative risk for roadways with 1-2 lanes are consistently lower, regardless of AADT. - There is an increased risk for both crashes and KSI crashes on roadway segments with more than 3 lanes. The risk of KSI crashes is greatest (1.4) on 6+ lane segments with moderate AADT. - Pedestrian crashes (2.1) and pedestrian KSI crashes (1.9) are of greatest risk on 3 to 5 lane urban roadway segments with lower AADT. - The greatest risk for bicycle crashes and bicycle KSI crashes occurs on 6+ lane roadway segments. - Of the crash types examined, all occur more frequently than average on 3 to 6+ lane roadway segments with moderate AADT. Of these, speed -related crashes carry the highest risk - nearly 2x the average risk on 6+ lane roadways. Category KSI 0.7 0.5 1.3 0.9 1.4 1.3 Crash 0.3 0.3 1.4 0.6 1.8 1.4 Pedestrian KSI 0.6 0.9 0.5 1.9 1.3 0.0 N Pedestrian 0.1 0.8 0.9 2.1 1.2 0.2 cc Bicycle KSI 0.0 0.6 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.5 a Bicycle 0.2 0.5 1.3 1.2 1.6 0.7 cc Left Turn 0.4 0.5 1.5 0.8 1.5 1.0 Angle 0.4 0.8 1.6 1.1 1.1 Ran off Roadway Crash 0.5 0.4 1.3 0.8 1.6 1.5 Speed -Related Crash 0.3 0.2 1.4 0.5 Mob" Table 79. Relative risk of crashes per lane -mile on urban roadways C "IY An Page 132 .9LLowER�via� Page 133 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP Rural Segments Table 20 shows the relative risk of key metrics for rural roadways for the crash category and across segment typologies. - In general, rural roadways have low AADT and risk increases with the number of lanes. Crashes are 8.5 times more likely on roadways with 6+ lanes, and KSI crashes are nearly 3 times more likely. However, the greatest number of rural roadway miles have 1-2 lanes. - Risk for all non -motorist crashes appears to be higher on larger rural roadways (3+ lanes); however, there are too few rural non -motorist crashes to definitively identify a trend. - Of the crash types examined, all have the greatest risk on rural roadways with 6+ lanes. Of these, speed -related crashes carry the highest risk — nearly 12x the average risk. Crash Category KSI 0.9 1.4 2.8 Crash 0.7 1.4 8.5 Pedestrian KSI 3.4 0.0 4e Pedestrian Qc Bicycle KSI 0.0 11.7 o Bicycle r Left Turn 0.7 2.2 4.8 Angle 0.7 ■ Ran off Roadway Crash 0.8 1.2 5.5 Speed -Related Crash 0.6 Table 20. Relative risk of crashes per lane -mile on rural roadways CM rl,) Un Paye 1 Page 134 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP Equity Considerations The Role of Equity in a Safety Action Plan Studies show that historically disadvantaged communities — including communities of color, low-income communities, and communities with limited resource availability— face higher injury risks due to lack of infrastructure investment and high rates of walking, bicycling, and transit use. In 2021, Indigenous, Black or African American, and Hispanic or Latino people in the United States faced higher traffic fatality rates than the overall population, with the disparity even more pronounced for certain groups outside of a vehicle. The fatality rate for Black and African American pedestrians and cyclists stood at 4.1 fatalities per 100,000 people while that for American Indian or Alaskan Native stood at 6.6, in comparison to a fatality rate of 2.5 for the total population.3 Evidence suggests that this disparity is widening: between 2017 and 2021, overall fatal traffic crashes rose 15% while fatalities among Black and Hispanic people increased 31% and 28% respectively.4 The USDOT has identified that people living in the 40% of counties with the highest poverty rate had 35% more fatalities than the national average per capita.5 These facts are not only concerning on their own but also contribute to economic insecurity, limited access to opportunities, health disparities, and other inequities, thereby deepening the impact of each fatality on families, neighborhoods, and communities. These same communities often experience less infrastructure and investment compared to more privileged areas or suffer from the negative effects of arterials and highways that divide neighborhoods, hinder mobility, and increase high-speed vehicle traffic. This has resulted in a significant disparity in the quality and design of streets in underserved communities. To effectively address crash factors on the County's roads, it's essential to identify the populations that the Safety Action Plan will serve and determine project priorities. The USDOT, FDOT, and Collier MPO are committed to creating a transportation network that equitably serves all users. Achieving zero traffic fatalities necessitates a dedicated effort to understand and tackle these disparities at their core. Vision Zero's principle of equitable infrastructure investment focuses on allocating more resources to areas that face disproportionate burdens, aiming to correct the impacts of past decisions. By investing equitably in safer streets, we can significantly enhance safety, disrupt the cycles of traffic deaths and serious injuries, and foster healthier, more just, and prosperous communities. Traffic Fatalities & Race in Collier County The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) documents racial data for traffic fatalities through the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). Traffic fatalities in Collier County from 2017 through 2021 were captured and analyzed to identify any racial disparities among traffic fatality victims 3 United States Department of Transportation. 2024. NHTSA's National Center for Statistics and Analysis, Traffic Safety Facts: Race and Ethnicity. Washington, DC: USDOT. Pg. 2-3, 5. 4 Ibid. Pg. 3 5 United States Department of Transportation. 2022. National Roadway Safety Strategy. Washington, DC: USDOT. Pg. 7. N.1EROU"I, An Page 134 �via� Page 135 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP in the County.6 Results from this analysis are outlined in Table 21. Consistent with national trends, non- white populations in Collier County bear a disproportionate number of traffic fatalities. Table 27. Race and fatalities analysis. Data Source: American Community Survey, 2078-2022: ACS 5-Year Estimates; Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), 2017-2021. Traffic Crashes & Disadvantaged Communities in Collier County The MPO's previous identification of Environmental Justice (EJ) communities were used to examine the issue of equity in terms of traffic safety countywide. These designations, updated for use in the 2019 Collier MPO Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, identify disadvantaged communities at the census block group level by analyzing four socio-economic factors: minority status, poverty, no access to a vehicle, and limited ability to speak English. The EJ communities were given ranking scores of low (one) to high (four or five) factors meaningfully greater (>10% points) than the countywide percentage, and refined by MPO staff and advisory committees.' Environmental Justice areas are shown in Figure 15. In Collier County, EJ areas include 34% of the county population and 27% of the total households but contain disproportionately large portions of the County's underserved populations, including non- white, impoverished, disabled, carless, and non-English speaking communities (Table 22). 6 Traffic fatalities include all fatal crashes in FARS database that fall within the County boundary. This matches the methodology for all other crash analyses in the memo. 7 Full details on EJ methodology can be found in the 2019 Collier MPO Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan accessed at https://www.colIiermpo.org/bp-master-plan/ C'IYUn Page 136 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP 380,221 - 129,626 34% 156,768 - 42,985 27% 101,782 27% 58,265 57% 124,784 33% 22,299 18% 39,131 10% 18,578 47% 34,458 22% 9,550 28% 7,270 5% 3,483 48% 10,650 7% 6,199 58% Table 22. Environmental Justice (EJ) areas and disadvantaged communities. Data Source: American Community Survey, 2078-2022: ACS 5-Year Estimates. *EJ populations are approximate to due to slight geographic changes in the block group level in the 2020 Census Between 2019 and 2022, approximately 35% of all crashes, and 38% fatal and serious injury crashes occurred on the 28% of roadway miles in EJ areas (Table 23). Although containing only 3% of the county's roadway miles, 9% of KSI crashes occurred in the most disadvantaged communities (EJ areas with the highest rank). This indicates a disproportionate amount of traffic safety risk to these communities. 3,161 - 885 28% 441 14% 108 3% Table 23. Crashes in Environmental Justice (EJ) Areas *This analysis uses non -interstate crashes 57,005 929 - 20,129 355 38% 8,754 124 13% 4,691 74 8% 2,983 70 8% 3,701 87 9% �IY1,in Page 136 R Page 137 of 184 00 O 00 cM N (0 CL Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP HIGH INJURY NETWORK Purpose A high -injury network (HIN) provides decision -makers with quantitative information about the specific streets and intersections with the highest concentration of severe traffic crashes that can, therefore, benefit most from the implementation of safety countermeasures. The network is identified based on data analysis of the rate of severe and fatal traffic injuries along road segments and intersections. While other tools may complement high injury networks in developing a data -driven safety action plan, high injury networks are useful for: Prioritizing Projects. A high -injury network indicates the major corridors and intersections with both the greatest demonstrated safety need and the greatest opportunities to make progress towards reducing serious injuries and fatalities. - Identifying High Impact Grant Application. A high -injury network indicates the corridors and intersections that are most likely to demonstrate safety need and impact on competitive regional, state, and federal grant applications. - Developing Critical Partnerships. A high -injury network demonstrates where partnerships are most needed, either as part of continuing inter -agency coordination, or as a starting point for collaboration. Methodology Because of the distinct types of crashes and related safety countermeasures at intersections and street segments, the methodology to determine the HIN evaluated both intersections and street segments separately. The HIN development process included several steps: 1) defining candidate locations, 2) crash assignment, and 3) location evaluation criteria and scoring. Candidate Intersections and Street Segments Candidate street segments and intersections follow the same guidelines as those included in the systemic analysis. Therefore, candidate intersections include all non -Interstate roadways found in the FDOT GIS Data Portal and candidate intersections include all intersections where segments meet along with all signal locations identified using Open Streets Map. Because the high -injury network is a tool to identify high - impact locations for safety improvements, local street networks are omitted from this analysis. Interstates have been excluded from the high -injury analysis due to differences in jurisdiction, traffic volumes, and the scope of countermeasures and strategies. Due to the size of the county, a separate high -injury network analysis was conducted for both urban and rural segments. FDOT functional classification was used to distinguish urban and rural segments. Any segment with a functional classification > 10 was marked urban, while any segment with a functional classification <10 was marked rural. Urban segments were defined as continuous roadway stretches between signalized intersections. In contrast, because rural segments often span much greater distances between intersections, they were divided into subsegments, each with a maximum length of two miles. Due to the low number of rural intersections, a single intersection high -injury network analysis was conducted county -wide. Urban and rural segment designations are outlined in Figure 16. M W-aw "I, An Page 138 .9LLowER�via� Page 139 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP Crash Assignment KSI crashes were assigned to intersections or segments: intersection crashes were defined to include crashes within 150 feet of the intersection, all other crashes were assigned as segment crashes. Location Evaluation Criteria and Scoring To evaluate safety risk at candidate intersections and street segments and develop the high -injury network, all intersection and roadway segments were evaluated on three equally weighted criteria: Severe Crash Risk Score, Facility Risk Score, and Relative Risk Score. Each criteria provides different, but equally important, information on the risk of severe crashes and potential impact of safety improvements for each candidate intersection and street segment. - Severe Crash Risk Score assesses the number of severe crashes (killed or serious injury crashes, or KSI crashes) that have occurred at each intersection and street segment in Collier County from 2019- 2023. This metric prioritizes locations with a higher frequency of KSI crashes. Facility Risk Score assesses the risk of each intersection and street segment based on their physical features (i.e. # of lanes, AADT, etc.). This metric is a systemic measure, as it prioritizes locations with a higher risk of crashes occurring, based on the crash frequency of streets or intersections of the same typology. Scores for each type are summarized in the High -Risk Features Analysis section of this memorandum. - Relative Risk Score assesses the number of severe crashes that have occurred at each intersection and street segment relative to all other intersections and street segments within the same typology (i.e. # of lanes, AADT, etc.). This metric prioritizes locations that performed poorly relative to locations with similar characteristics. These three criteria are combined to produce a net HIN score for each segment and intersection. Scores for each assessment criteria are normalized to vary from 0 to 1, with 0 representing the lowest safety risk and 1 representing the highest safety risk. Scores for all criteria are then summed for each intersection and street segment to yield a net score between 0 and 3. Intersections and segments with the highest scores are then included in the HIN. Results Based on the methodology described above, top -ranked intersections and segments were identified for inclusion in the final high -injury network for intersections, urban segments and rural segments. Two tiers of priority locations were identified for each of these high -injury network layers. The top 15% (851h-1001h percentile) of scores are identified as the Tier I High -Injury Network and the next 15% (7011_85th percentile) are identified as the Tier II High -Injury Network. The cutoffs between tiers were identified to provide a substantial portion of KSI within each tier, while not adding an excessive number of intersections or roadway mileage. These networks are shown in Figure 17 and Figure 18. NOU "IYUn Page 140 Page 141 of 184 i N Z d N m 0 z v m 0 U w 01 Y OJo IZi c� m=a w -M'� o Z —1212 N t _ t• � l •c 00 0 N N It 00 0 (M N O rn = Y (O M O M CO u u 1 ♦ t r /i f. � `l Y --n.�R6 PG pooaa}m 7S 4 x Z Q 7 z @u v m ea�8U L ,mi E +T+ A.100 Rd 71 'Z min Cgldon U;--- -_.— / - --- -c- F I 1.16 1 G1 � A i 1 � I � (B 1 n 1 C � QEe 1 V 01 Y • 1 1 y Z I F-� UE mrc -..#1 N - • LU i� d N +� o m ••r a yrIk�_ Q O h o ® ns�w Irf. a -- - --- - m zz z U _ • • ®•i it _ �a VM co i � •Yi � � ;�� a A 0 0 a, ,N_ V ZQ �Ua u u Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP Collectively, the Tier I and Tier II high -injury network captures 463 KSI crashes (92.6/year) acrossjust over 109 total centerline miles of roadway. This includes 56 miles of urban roadways, 49.1 miles of rural roadways, and 80 intersections, equating to 4.5 miles of roadway$ (Table 24). Thus, the HIN captures a substantial portion of KSI within Collier County in just a small portion of roadways and intersections: • Tier I captures 31% of KSI crashes on just 1.6% of roadway miles Tier I & II capture 50% of KSI crashes on just 4.0% of roadway miles. The share of centerline miles and KSI crashes between the tiers, as well as between urban/rural segments and intersections are further detailed in Table 25. High -Injury Network Share Centerline Mileage and KSI Crashes (Percentage)Table 25. The Tier I intersections are summarized in Table 26, Tier I urban segments in Table 27, and Tier I rural segments in 8 Each intersection is counted as 300 feet of centerline miles due to a 150-foot crash assignment buffer. "IY din rage 143 R Page 144 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP Table 28. The HIN is shown in Figure 17 and Figure 18 above. Tier I Tier II Total Urban Segments 20.9 35.1 56.0 Rural Segments 19.3 29.7 49.1 Intersections2.4 2.1 4.5 . 42.7 67.0 109.6 Table 24. High -Injury Network Total Centerline Mileage and KSI Crashes (Miles) Tier I Tier II Total 143 99 242 40 29 69 109 43 152 292 171 463 Urban Segments 0.8% 1.3% 2.1% 15% Rural Segments 0.7% 1.1% 1.8% 4% Intersections0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 12% . . 1.6% 2.5% 4.05vo 31% Table 25. High -Injury Network Share Centerline Mileage and KSI Crashes (Percentage) 1 XD,U 'IYI.in Page 145 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP Table 26. HIN Tier I Intersections .� � ���ruuui�a�•iuuuuu�•��� Oil Well Rd & FL-29 Royal Fakapalm 7 1 Golden Gate Pkwy & Collier Blvd Golden Gate 3 2 Neapolitan Way & Tamiami Trl City of Naples 4 3 Airport Pulling Rd & Pine Ridge Crossing Central Naples 4 3 FL-82 & Corkscrew Rd Corkscrew 4 5 Tamiami Tr1 & Goodlette-Frank Rd City of Naples 4 6 Tamiami Trl & Airport Pulling Rd East Naples 4 7 Golden Gate Pkwy & Goodlette-Frank Rd City of Naples 4 7 Davis Blvd & Airport Pulling Rd East Naples 4 7 Davis Blvd & Collier Blvd Royal Fakapalm 3 10 Tamiami Trl & Rattlesnake Hammock Rd East Naples 3 11 Vanderbilt Beach Rd & Tamiami Trl North Naples 3 12 New Market Rd W & Charlotte St Immokalee 2 13 N Collier Blvd & E Elkcam Cir City of Marco 2 14 Pine Ridge Rd & Collier Blvd Golden Gate 2 15 Immokalee Rd & Collier Blvd Urban Estates 2 15 E Main St & New Market Rd E Immokalee 2 17 Vanderbilt Beach Rd & Oakes Blvd Urban Estates 2 17 Pine Ridge Rd & Naples Blvd North Naples 2 19 Golden Gate Pkwy & Tamiami Trl City of Naples 2 19 Pine Ridge Rd & Airport Pulling Rd Central Naples 2 19 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd & Collier Blvd South Naples 2 19 Golden Gate Pkwy & 1-75 West Ramp Central Naples 2 19 Pine Ridge Rd & 1-75 West Ramp Urban Estates 2 19 91st Ave N & Tamiami Trl North Naples 2 19 Main House Dr & Tamiami Tr1 North Naples 2 19 Corkscrew Rd & Wildcat Dr Corkscrew 2 27 Tamiami Tr1 & Bayshore Dr East Naples 2 28 Immokalee Rd & Logan Blvd N Urban Estates 2 29 Oil Well Rd & Everglades Blvd N Rural Estates 2 29 Solana Rd & Goodlette-Frank Rd Central Naples 2 29 Tamiami Tr1 & Southwest Blvd South Naples 2 29 Tamiami Trl & Broward St South Naples 2 29 Tamiami Tr1 & Saint Andrews Blvd Marco 2 29 Tamiami Trl & Lakewood Blvd East Naples 2 29 Tamiami Tr1 & & Palm Dr East Naples 2 29 COLLIER "IYI,in Page 145 Page 146 of 184 Collier MPO SS4A SAP Existing Conditions & Safety Analysis Memorandum Contract No. 18-7432 MP Davis Blvd & Shadowlawn Dr East Naples 2 29 13th Ave N & Goodlette-Frank Rd N City of Naples 2 29 Fleischmann Blvd & Tamiami Trl City of Naples 2 29 Fleischmann Blvd & Goodlette-Frank Rd N City of Naples 2 29 Old Trail Dr & Tamiami Trl City of Naples 2 29 Old Groves Rd & Airport Pulling Rd North Naples 2 29 Pelican Bay Blvd & Tamiami Trl North Naples 2 29 0 C - 'IYUn Page146 Page 147 of 184 $ 5 $ � \ e m # m z » < c \ Q g g -1 g S ° CL . _ CL m m m » m # / » N # m m m 00 m < c m CT)0 # e m 0) 0) 0) -i m . f \ m @ @ -i m m @ ¥ @ @ q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ $ G u $ G G G -LLI G G $ @ G $ G ®CL a j m 2 5 m 2 / k j 2 2 / j § § 2 = z a y z 0 m z = t t c a / G E » f 0 / _ / z / / O G 7 = O u u = z z \ � 7 7 E / J k \ ± . _ > L CC \ 2 $ = z \ 0 7 / % t { ¥ } / : cr m = $ _ \ z 9 0 = $ u , ® _ ; \ \ E \ \ / / \ \ \ \ \ \ i ; \ ( � 2 _ = 2 4 E < .2 = z / 6 \ } \ cr c W j \ k $ W / k � 2 0 f co ® R / > < ¢ ¥ \ / ® G % G f » @ 2 \ _ A -L 2 u \ LU \ / 2 \ \ \ \ \ u 2 , ¢ _ _ e / �� \ �2 § .w" « ry)7 OMER � � cc� \ % ; &bb bbS ` - _ _ - - a - - - z b / A / bb A w\ \ ( \ \ 7 \ \ \ \ \ 7 ; \ \ 7 \ $ - ! 2 2 2 5 E 7 2 2 7 7 # $ E \ uo I-- Ln I-- I-- E I ¢ a �\ r� 00 Ql O —1 N M I;t In tD I, 00 rr O ci N M a —I a —I a —I N N rV N N N N N N N M M M M r-I M M N 0) N ci r1 rf) Il —1 —1 —1 ci lD N Ln LD I, 00 rV tD N Il Lr) 00 O O O O 00 Lr) a —I Lr) ll:� M M -i li Lq N N N N -i N O O O O O -1 O O O O —1 O O O O -1 O Ln Ln CL Q Q ;a ro 7a (1) r0 cl ;° Q a) cl a) Q Q r0 z ra (D co Q z f6 z ro Q f0 z Q z r0 z z w z _ w z v m ca z rL° O c a) s z - O s "' z O z O 7 U z Z) (D vim) LU U U Z) V) LU U LU U V) U L ao v 00 = � � v Y O a r0 O u O Z T Y Y E E Y > roD_ > a) D_ L m = % m J % > C7 m O C L O on L (6 m L > O (7 C v C C . Q O L QL- O `) Q E O'O 2iL yC O E O In _ O U OO C7 (D H oC m Q U 2 U w z Q C7 v) co w O ra U L 0 > O ->> 0 un ? > > m > L L c0 0o MM o � L > c O Z � Q) L z Ln L N ra �_ L E a� i _> 00 °c_° E m m O > Q a, In m 3 E Q Of u ra + ra w U a 6 a) n C O O a1 ca r0 M V) D_ O -i(.:i O U to rV O LL N -iU O c C t cn m mLL. N cr M > Y i at r (1) Gam) -a O = t7 a 41 m O E E m i -0 m m c Ln > m a = U H •E E H oc C •3 41 O Q- Q H •� E H > m d = U H •E E m y Y O E E oa C 3 41 p 0. Q H M •� m uL E m 7 $ $ % $ q ? % % @ J z m � e # N m e z e N m » m m m « m m o o m @ R ZT m @ ¥ % @ e @ @ 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 o e o 6 » » $ $ » » c $ $ CL CL 0 _» ® s § / 2 2 z § 2 j 0 = 2 % _ % 0 5 = /» » 0 » » \ 7 u o / / Lu u u / _ | > 7 \ E E < / > / / / 7 2 \ z ƒ _< \ e \ \ / s \ / : z u w / \ < 3 # J 2 J § 7 } \ m 6 [ $ _ — u = / \ 7 J / \ m \ F \ a)\ \ u cc= J 2 e u e u � 2 $ ® a bb \ 7 \ F- E 2 \ F- 1& ° E £ M � 00. a 7 \ F- 2 % 2 2 7 ca 7 o _0\ m § > $ 5 / $ \ e CL 2 CL O r-I N m 't LI) ci N m I;j- Ln tD Il 00 Ol ci -1 r-I -i r-I -i m 00 -1 Kt m -i N N N �t .--I m m m O 00 Il tD I;j- N O O N O Kt r-I I, n O Ln lD LT m 00 O tD 00 00 O m tD al a) O m O I O i r I O O O N N O -i c I N O E C ( a) C) Y Y Y Y Y Y Q) (Ii Y U U W W W W W U W U U W U T W V1 1� VI 1� — (6 — l6 —l6 —l6 —l6 V) 1� —(6 V) V) — V) L O L O L 7 L 7 L 7 L 7 L 7 L O L 7 L O L O > O O L 7 U U Of of cr Of C� U of U u K U m cg� ~C_ J C � TO � E O N O O Z > m lD > m O � z > •� �' �' Q 0 N -p 'p W N m 'Q V) O Y Vf c > z L H - 3 m U 'Z- lU j > Q N 00 m � n p v) O 00 N 7 N •� c- E 7 0 In cLa U O C u a� � Y OC J E J Y U l0 In O L N I� i > co N O 0' m `^ "6 O Z • Y 7 cr- 'O N /L L H > O N Q 3 > L CO U U L Y L N fp co T � � � L J c cN CA p m \ OJ \ > c a m z O c� C O C6 Of -i 2 cp G r1 K Ln Ln Q U 7 m a 0 a L i N 2 H L L cc Y Y Y Y Y Y •E •E Y nl -le Y +s+ Ln O E O E O E O E O E N op O E O E G E E N co O E E E E E E E E E m. E o Z LL u I-- U-i � 00 0 LO a) ca a SS4A Safety Action Plan Steering Committee Updated 1117125 amc Name Affiliation 1 John McNamara Concerned Citizen 2 Michelle Avola-Brown NPC Ex. Director & CTST Chair 3 Anthony Matonti BPAC Chair 4 Neal Gelfand CAC Vice -Chair 5 jDan Hall, PE County TMSD, Traffic Ops-Safety 6 Lorraine Lantz (alternate Katherine Eastley) County TMSD, Transportation Planning, TAC Chair 7 Tony Camps County Emergency Management Services 8 Alison Bickett, PE Naples -Traffic Engineering, TAC Vice -Chair, CIVIC 9 Justin Martin, PE Marco Island Public Works Director 10 Captain David Ennis Marco Island PD 11 Sgt. Anna Horowitz County Sheriff Office Traffic Safety 12 Sgt. Greg Sheridan Naples PD Community Oriented Policing 13 Reggie Wilson Dept of Health 14 Kyle Kemmish (alternate Amara DeCicco) FDOT D1, Safety Work Program Team 15 Christie Betancourt Immokalee CRA, Program Manager 16 Tami Scott Bayshore CRA, Program Manager 17 John Dunnuck County CRA, Division Director 18 Kevin Donaldson (alternate Joseph DeBono) Miccosukee Tribe 19 Emran Rahaman (alts: Adam Ahmad, Hector Garcia) 1seminole Tribe 20 John Lambcke Collier Public Schools, Transportation Dir. 21 Monica Ramos lConcerned Citizen, Golden Gate Estates 23 Michaela Henning lConcerned Citizen, Business Owner Page 152 of 184 2/14/2025 Item # 11.13 ID# 2025-532 Executive Summary FDOT Presentation on Old 41 Project Development & Environment Study OBJECTIVE: For the Board to receive an update on FDOT's Project Development and Environment Study (PD&E) for Old 41. CONSIDERATIONS: The Old 41 PD&E (financial project number 435110-2) is to add lanes and reconstruct Old US 41 from US 41 in Collier County to the Lee/Collier County Line. The project is programmed with $3 million in SU funds for Preliminary Engineering (design) in FY 2028 in the MPO's current Transportation Improvement Program (FY25-29) and in FDOT's Draft Tentative Work Program for FY26-30. FDOT recently requested an additional $100,000 from each MPO — Lee and Collier — to revise the concept and complete the necessary technical analysis and documentation due to updates to regulatory requirements and feedback from local agency partners. FDOT will give a presentation on the status of the Old 41 PD&E to the MPO Board. (Attachment 1) COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Technical and Citizens Advisory Committees received the same presentation from FDOT at their January meetings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: No action required; provided for informational purposes only. PREPARED BY: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENTS: FDOT Presentation on Old 41 PD&E Page 153 of 184 v co 0 A co I= >. Zp W �dH �O� J W >2UJ J 0 Z O ~ � nWCO MI) > °oOZ wm W ad L 0 U �-0 ca � E:ry 0 J � U �m 0 U� J m 0 0 U) J E� U LO CD U N C Q cn 1 U) ii m Q Lm m ) A�+ U) _Ile ors4-0 .> U, cn v, o }' U OCDs .N � U L > �C) O ca �_ �� ° �°� 0 Cl) v o LL to � Q v 00 0 LO L2 a� co d M r�0 00 Lon Q Z Q V asayd � a a� u H o `^ I i E ai ovv� £ asayd L u >% E E Z asayd 0 1 asayd co A W O L a) (� p a) _0 � n � Q QUA m U a)•-� to U U) 4-0 U O p O O a_ a_ w a- n Q � H z Z ME O d m N JL �� 11` C r H z_ 5 N Ens ¢ U o m U n d o 0 U U m � m f y f a s � I o d3 � G Q Z J ® J = N Y � W p I H L N ca O O C O � U o � 0 U �0 co m E O Q LO m � O � ._ L •CL > .� m cn co 0 C N N N I L C/) (� s J O � I 0 > mw O l) J E .— U O p O '0 0 0cv U4— cfl V W O W LO O d v 00 0 rn a� m d U) O U L O U) U) O 4-j L (n _0 0 .O O m O > •� p N U p j Q N L O O (L I. . _0 O U 0 C6 O Ocaa) 4-0 (� > O , N m O Ca co _ N N _ O Co N �_t 70 � O O _0 O CT O U O o N to Q m < ' tr+tiM` 7w i v 00 w 0 0 (1) _O Q Q co U) coO 0 CZ •L M U) O O O z O z Q Q O Q Q M O 4' U) O O 0 0 o O > 0 F � r r 0 0 .- 40 z o� o � CM O OV ` U) U) Y o�0 0:4 0 OONNM% 00 V L ■ V m E ■ uu O V CD 1 r r LO M qe 1-1 C; O M M co N H LL . z .� CM 2 O O0 0 ~ O M Ch N O C) M N O O LO � 0 09- N M _O Q O U N O N I O O O O O N N N N T- O N O a) a) _0 _0 _0 p E C C p O O O Z Z Z n c a W 06 .7 _ W O U L U) O U It co w 0 M N r qq 0 00 V r ti M LO M It z, r O r r LO M qq v 00 w 0 Ncoo O N a> N a= U3 J J Z 1 w O Z N U L co Cc 0- 0 0 H O Z y�+� (n L 5� = G A VW/ T co U Q 06 � T:) o o U V :5 O a> N O N N O N a)CO N O N 'L 'L Q Q oo N co ti N i LL U O U N co I N U CO M) `M! 0 CYM0 ) n, t ' J �++ J }i O 0 O N O cn ti +� N N V QCIO N N �+ 0j X � Q O O >.o 00 � > i p L p (JD � LL U)0- 0 U) v 00 0 LO a� m a I V M Lm cu 0 0 0 E 0 E LM LL, 2/14/2025 Item # 11.0 ID# 2025-533 Executive Summary Report on Status of Lee County and Collier MPO Consolidation Feasibility Study OBJECTIVE: For the Board to be informed about, and have the opportunity to provide input on, a draft Scope of Services for a Lee and Collier MPO Consolidation Feasibility Study. CONSIDERATIONS: The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) notified the Lee and Collier MPO Directors that FDOT is funding and administering a consolidation feasibility study, budgeted at $250,000, and requested input on a potential scope of tasks. The two directors coordinated on providing the attached draft Scope of Services in response (Attachment 1). During last year's legislative session, Senate Bill 1032 included a requirement for the Lee and Collier MPOs to conduct a feasibility study on consolidating the two MPOs. Though the legislation did not get to a final vote, it is likely to come back up again. Below is the relevant language that was included in Senate Bill 1032 last year: (i) By February 28, 2025, the M.P.O.s serving Lee and Collier must submit a feasibility report to the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives exploring the benefits, costs, and process of consolidation into a single M.P.O. serving the contiguous urbanized area, the goal of which would be to: 1. Coordinate transportation projects deemed to be regionally significant. 2. Review the impact of regionally significant land use decisions on the region. 3. Review all proposed regionally significant transportation projects in the transportation improvement program. FDOT met with the Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR) to discuss the Scope of Services and asked CUTR to submit a proposal that fine-tunes the draft the directors submitted and to address FDOT's concerns regarding affordability and timeliness. In the meantime, the Lee and Collier MPO Directors are taking the draft Scope to their respective advisory committees and MPO Boards for informational purposes and to report comments to FDOT. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The draft Scope was presented to the Technical and Citizens' Advisory Committees at their January meetings. No formal action was taken. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Provided for information purposes and to receive Board comments. PREPARED BY: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENTS: Draft Lee and Collier MPO Consolidation Feasibility Study Scope of Services Page 167 of 184 Lee and Collier MPO Consolidation Feasibility Study Scope of Services Purpose and Need In response to proposed state legislation during the 2024 Florida Legislative Session and recent support by local legislators and elected officials, FDOT is providing $250,000 to study the feasibility of consolidating the Lee and Collier MPOs. The study will include the issues, revenues/costs/financial management plan, organizational structure, benefits/drawbacks and a potential timeline and process for creating a single metropolitan planning organization serving the Cape Coral and Bonita Springs urbanized areas. FDOT will negotiate a task work order with a consultant firm or team to assist the staff and the Boards of the two MPOs in creating a staffing, management, and procedural framework to fulfill the responsibilities of a federally designated MPO, consistent with federal regulations (23 US Code 134) and state statutes (Chapter 163) for consideration by the two MPO Boards. The Consultant will work with the MPO staff to address the scope tasks listed below to provide the necessary information for the two MPO Boards to determine whether to pursue the creation of a new regional MPO. It is important to note the milestones of each task and coordination with the two MPOs to receive input to determine if those items can be resolved before moving on to the next step in the process. Project Management and Schedule The project will be jointly managed by the two MPOs and FDOT. The MPOs shall each appoint a single project manager to serve as the primary point of contact for the project. Task 1: Kick Off Meeting, Project Management and Coordination Activities The Consultant will hold a kick off meeting with the Lee and Collier MPOs and FDOT staff where the scope tasks and schedule will be discussed. As part of this meeting, the MPO staff for each MPO will provide the Consultant pertinent information on how each MPO currently conducts business in regards to MPO apportionment, agreements, funding, operations and staffing. This task will also include periodic virtual progress meetings with the Lee and Collier MPO Directors and FDOT to provide updates throughout the study, seek input on issues, discuss future work activities and coordinate deliverables. Deliverables: • Kick-off meeting agenda and a summary of the results • A project schedule that MPO staff can share with our respective Boards • Agendas for the progress meetings along with summary notes on what was discussed and any follow up items Page 168 of 184 Task 2: Coordination with FHWA and FTA to Provide Guidance on Questions and Issues The Consultant with the MPO staff and FDOT will coordinate with FHWA and FTA staff on questions and clarifications on items that impact the consolidation of the two TMA areas and need to be answered before drafting an apportionment plan. For example, one of these items includes the interpretation of the central city(ies) of both TMA's in the approval of the apportionment plan. The Consultant and staff will put together questions to be provided to the FHWA and FTA staff ahead of scheduling a coordination meeting to ensure ample opportunity for them to research the answers to the questions. The Consultant will draft a memorandum with the responses and any remaining regulation questions that have not been resolved. The memorandum will also include a breakdown of the remaining issues and how each of the responses impacts positively or negatively the consolidation of the MPO's. Deliverables: • List of questions to be provided to FHWA and FTA • Memorandum with the results of the coordination efforts Task 3: Document Existing Regional Coordination and Benefits/Drawbacks to the Proposed Consolidated MPO The Consultant will develop a memorandum for use in providing information on what the current regional coordination entails along with outlining what a consolidated MPO could do for the area in the future. This analysis will help provide information as to what is currently done but also provide an overview of what could be done as part of a consolidated MPO in the future. The memorandum needs to identify the benefits and drawbacks of combining the MPO's to provide the two MPO Boards with this needed information prior to getting into the discussions regarding the apportionment. This documentation should include examples of other regional MPO's best practices in operations, coordination, duties, public involvement, voting, project prioritization and balancing local versus regional needs. Finally, this memorandum should include recommendations on work responsibilities that Board members think the regional MPO should be doing that are currently not accomplished by the existing regional coordination agreements and requirements. Deliverables: Memorandum that includes current regional activities, benefits/drawbacks of consolidation and best regional practices from other areas. This memorandum will also include input from the current Board members on tasks or responsibilities that they think we should be doing as a consolidated MPO that are beyond our current federal and state requirements. 2 Page 169 of 184 Task 4: Proposed Apportionment Plan The Consultant will assist the two MPOs and their local government partners in identifying proposed apportionment plans for the proposed consolidated board composition consistent with federal and state requirements. This task will include developing a preferred apportionment Board member alternative as well. The proposed and preferred alternative will be presented to the MPO Boards for consideration. The intent of this task is to seek a consensus and draft an agreement on the voting allocations before moving on to the remaining tasks of this scope. The consultant will prepare and present a draft Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU) or some other draft approval process. The Consultant, MPO staff and attorneys shall meet to decide how the draft apportionment plan should be approved before moving on to the next step in the process. If this moves forward, the final apportionment plan will be approved by the MPO Boards at a future date and presented to the Governor for final approval. But it makes little sense to move forward with the remaining tasks in the study if an agreement on the voting appears like it is a barrier that the two MPO's cannot overcome. Deliverables: • Draft apportionment plans to be presented to the two MPO's for consideration • Some form of a draft agreement from the general purpose local governments representing 75% of the population of the urbanized area(s) and the central city(ies) Task 5: Determine the Organization Structure, Costs and Policies/Procedures The Consultant shall review the current MPO structure of both MPO's, operating costs and staffing and put together a memorandum of what a consolidated MPO may look like. This analysis will include a proposed budget (initial start-up and ongoing operations) and staff for the consolidated MPO in enough detail to get input by the member jurisdictions on whether or not they are willing to take on the responsibilities of having the consolidated MPO attached to them for all or certain services. The most important being the capital float/bank as the MPOs are operating on a reimbursement basis. If none of the local entities indicate that they are willing to take this on, the analysis for the new regional MPO will then default to the assumption that it will become an independent entity consistent with how the Lee MPO currently operates. Once a determination on whether the new consolidated MPO is hosted or independent, the Consultant will then identify how the MPO financial, office operations and benefits will be handled (including agreements, if hosted). Examples of these items include IT, legal, accountant, HR, auditor, phones, internet copier, website, insurance, office and meeting space and benefits etc. The Consultant will assess and report on the financial liabilities and assets of each MPO (develop a balance sheet of assets and liabilities) likely to be in place at the time 3 Page 170 of 184 of a merger and develop a transition plan assigning responsibilities to each MPO. The Consultant will develop a financial plan for operating the consolidated MPO based on projected PL allocations and member contributions and show how core planning documents will be funded using TMA SU funds if needed to supplement PL and local contributions. This task will also include recommended MPO policies, procedures, internal controls and bylaws for the proposed consolidated MPO for consideration. Task 5 represents another major milestone in determining whether the two Boards wish to continue on to Task 6. Deliverables: • Determination of a hosted or independent MPO structure • Develop a financial plan for the MPO structure that takes into account projected revenue streams and costs. • Memorandum that includes what the consolidated MPO will look like for financial management, office operations and benefits Task 6: Review of Interlocal Agreements, Contractual Requirements and Recommended Timeline for Inclusion in Final Report The Consultant will review existing agreements and contracts to make recommendations on what needs to be changed regarding existing MPO agreements and contracts as well as what future agreements will need to be put in place. From this review, recommendations will be made on the possible timeline for consolidation. This task will include drafting a final report that includes the information on any issues with existing agreements, future needed new MPO agreements and based on that information, recommendations on the timing for consolidation. The final report will also include the combining of the memorandums from each of the preceding tasks and a synopsis of the findings for review by the two MPO's. Following receipt of comments, the consultant will revise the report and produce a final version. Deliverables: • Review and recommendations on existing and future agreements • Development of final draft report for review by the two MPO's and finalize the report following review 4 Page 171 of 184 2/14/2025 Item # 12.A ID# 2025-534 Executive Summary Administrative Modification to the FY2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program - Add funds for Livingston/FPL Trail OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a copy of the fourth administrative modification made to the FY2025- 2029 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). CONSIDERATIONS: The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) sent a letter (Attachment 1) with State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Detail (Attachment 2) requesting an addition of federal funds to the following project: • FPN 447514-1 — SU and DIH funds for the Project Development and Environment phase of Livingston FPL Bike Path/Trail Extension from Radio Road to Collier County Line of the SUN Trail network. The TIP Administrative Modification signature page and project sheet are shown in Attachment 3. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: For MPO Board to receive a copy of the fourth administrative modification made to the FY2025-2029 TIP. PREPARED BY: Sean Kingston, AICP, PMP, Principal Planner ATTACHMENTS: FDOT Letter 1/7/25 STIP Detail Administrative Modification No. 4 to the FY2025-2029 TIP (1/16/25) Page 172 of 184 Docusign Envelope ID: 8D5BB406-AE32-4387-9D15-A4B92B74BBEA FDOT Florida Department of Transportation RON DESANTIS 605 Suwannee Street JARED W. PERDUE, P.E. GOVERNOR Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 SECRETARY January 7, 2025 Collier County MPO ATTN: Mrs. Anne McLaughlin, Executive Director 2885 Horseshoe Dr S Naples, FL 34104 RE: Request to Revise Fiscal Year (FY) 2024/25-2028/29 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Dear Mrs. McLaughlin: Florida Department of Transportation requests Collier County MPO revise the FY 2024/25-2028/29 TIP to reflect project changes as described below. Project # 448810-1 is a new Transit project that received 5310 Federal funds to cover capital expenses. Adding a new project requires a TIP amendment so that federal funds can be authorized. Project # 447514-1 was already included the MPO FY 24/25-28/29 TIP. Additional federal funds have been added to the project. TIP modification is needed for transparency and consistency. Please use the information below to revise the TIP accordingly: FM# Project Description Length Phase Fund Source Amount FY 448810-1 5310 CAPITAL 0.000 CAP DPTO $ 64,033 2025 COLLIER COUNTY miles DU $ 512,247 BOCC (CAT) - BONITA LF $64,035 SPRINGS UZA Total $ 640,315 www.fdot.gov Page 173 of 184 Docusign Envelope ID: 8D5BB406-AE32-4387-9D15-A4B92B74BBEA 447514-1 LIVINGSTON FPL TRAIL 0.000 PD&E DIH $ 5,000 2025 EXT FROM RADIO RD miles SU $700,000 TO COLLIER COUNTY Total $ 705,500 LINE As always, feel free to contact the Liaison Group at D1-Liaisons(o)-dot.state.fl.us if you have any questions. Sincerely, DocuSigned by: -,,4-. `S,,u 358572051DDE4C5... Kristi A. Smith, CPM, PLS Community Liaison Manager Cc: Wayne Gaither, FDOT Marcellus Evans, FDOT Page 174 of 184 A Y Q N N of O O Ipp� n OI W Of an -I 7 eel O N eNl W Of 1� enl n ei N N N W W M n n n n n n a -I ei ei O O O Oq W w 0 a` w N N N N N N O N M a O N � uJ M eNi O Cpp'l � f0 eNi eNi eNi ppM I M t0 f0 t�0 Y ���ssss Z f a a N _U 2 H Q � a a Y 3 0 d T H Q U N N H F f ~ a � U~ 6 N m U � a Z � �O O U a m N J � 6 O O J U Z p i U m Q � � N � O 6 Y Q Q F 1 S m w a Z LL � O O N O a a j O O N � Z 7 O p U U z a c u O W � U O Q m � � � a � V " N Z � y a E � Q a � a o .2 U C a O O A N Y a N N A N N N N N N N O N O O O O N O I� O O O O O N O O O O O O O N N N W OD EO O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oq W u d .a a` w Y S w N O O O O O O O O c O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Y_ N m a � 3 3 2 U' y S T m N N a � X � a N .. w Z Q J 6 LL j 0 d Y Z O o m 3 J O Y t5 CD Z -- U D o ? U ¢ A D N H O N w a O Q N = Z m N c = m m � � N N o d a y F N s aL S j 3 � N H v U � O c c W O m w Q m d a O W d � b " Q � Z a Q E � o t O a a 00 w- 0 LO r LL Me > w Ln N U W a a c D o 0 0 0 0 E 0 Ln 0 o wV) cn W O a � z w kn .o U -O Q zo N a N � O rN-i O ¢ y � � H � Q W O � w � � O U � � a� N N cd a� a 00 o O o O O O O PI- 6 O o O O O N -Ln O O - a � N 0 C O F .3 y O O O o 00 N O N • • • v O n o F- Ql N � c-I O N O O O O O ^^ 1..� 0 0 F U O Q C/ . N L.L N 0 X w F- O N cV J D Q ~ 0 "' 0 0 0 0 ' ^, u J J L.L O Ln O O O Ln N LPL z oaC m l0 v O O 0 O = 0 c ("'A(D a LU a � u (9 z Q r, Y_ m 2i O — O O Z 1O a N 0 O •L 0 U c O � r LU LU 0 N Q) (3) , a d a LU 40 Q � 4' O v N ao c CL J O o C ° v vLn 0-o o �„ C o LL _ o U 2/14/2025 Item # 12.13 ID# 2025-535 Executive Summary Letter of Support for Acquisition of Bonita -Estero Rail Trail (BERT) SUN Trail Application OBJECTIVE: For the Board to receive a copy of the MPO's BERT letter of support. CONSIDERATIONS: The Collier MPO Director submitted a letter of support (Attachment 1) for Lee MPO's SUN Trail application for $20 million for Phase 1 acquisition of the Seminole Gulf Rail corridor from Wiggins Pass Blvd in Collier County to Estero Parkway in Lee County. The acquisition will make it possible to design and construct the Bonita -Estero Rail Trail, a Collier MPO priority project for the use of SUN Trail funds. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: N/A PREPARED BY: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENTS: Letter of Support for BERT acquisition (12/18/24) Page 178 of 184 COLLIER Metropolitan Planning Organization 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 • (239) 252-5814 • collier.mpo(cD_colliercountyfl.gov December 18, 2024 Ms. Robin Birdsong Statewide SUN Trail Coordinator Florida Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450 Dear Ms. Birdsong: I am writing to express Collier MPO's support for the Lee MPO SUN Trail application for $20 million for Phase 1 acquisition of the Seminole Gulf Rail corridor from Wiggins Pass Blvd in Collier County to Estero Parkway in Lee County. The acquisition of the rail corridor will make it possible to design and construct the Bonita -Estero Rail Trail (BERT) as a safe and attractive venue for cycling and walking that residents and visitors of all ages could enjoy for generations to come. Acquisition also creates opportunities to integrate transit and other multimodal features that support public access to the trail system. The 14.9-mile-long BERT extends 1.5 miles south into Collier County from the Lee/Collier County Line and is an important connecting link in the Florida Gulf Coast Trail. The regional connections and local recreational opportunities that such trails make possible are highly valued, as demonstrated by the Collier MPO Board's unanimous vote on April 12, 2024 to make the acquisition of the Bonita - Estero Rail Trail a priority project. Sincerely, Anne McLaughlin Executive Director Cc: MPO Board Members Page 179 of 184 2/14/2025 Item # 12.0 ID# 2025-536 Executive Summary Letter of Support for Miccosukee Tribe's Grant Application for the Snake Road Safety Improvement Project OBJECTIVE: For the Board to receive a copy of the MPO's letter of support for the Miccosukee Tribe's grant application. CONSIDERATIONS: The Collier MPO Director submitted a letter of support (Attachment 1) for the Miccosukee Tribe's Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Stability and Equity (RAISE) grant application for the Snake Road Safety Improvement Project. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: N/A PREPARED BY: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENTS: Letter of Support for the Miccosukee Tribe's grant application for Snake Rd Safety Project Page 180 of 184 COLLIER Metropolitan Planning Organization 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 • (239) 252-5814 • collier.mpo(cD_colliercountyfl.gov January 15, 2025 Secretary Pete Buttigieg Office of Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Office of the Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 United States RE: Support for Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida's Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Stability and Equity (RAISE) Grant Program, Assistance Listing # 20.933, Number: DTOS59-25-RA-RAISE Dear Mr. Buttigieg, As the Executive Director of the Collier MPO, I am writing to express my support for the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida's proposal for the Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) discretionary grant program. The Snake Road Safety Improvement Project ("Project") is crucial to address the urgent needs of the underserved Miccosukee community. The Project will result in widened lanes, a new shoulder, and road safety improvements. The outcomes of the Project align with the mission and priorities of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) by advancing equity, incorporating climate and sustainability considerations, bolstering economic strength, and positioning the Tribe for global competitiveness. The Project also aligns with the goals of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) because the improvements to Snake Road are safety -driven and will rectify the current operational deficiencies of the facility. The MPO Board has adopted the Florida Department of Transportation's Vision Zero Safety Targets and has consistently offered its full support for the Miccosukee Tribe's endeavors in realizing these objectives. Snake Road, also known as BIA Road 1281, is a winding and narrow two-lane road that serves as the primary access to the Miccosukee Tribe's Alligator Alley Reservation and the Seminole Tribe's Big Cypress Reservation. Located in the western end of Broward County, Florida, this road is a lifeline between these communities and I-75 and is instrumental in fulfilling Tribal members' daily needs. It is a key evacuation route in an area frequently swept by hurricanes and wildfires. Due to substandard, deteriorated, and narrow conditions, many accidents have resulted. Urgent intervention is necessary to resolve safety hazards and improve the resilience of the roadway to meet the social, economic, and emergency needs of Tribal members and the traveling public. Snake Road is prioritized for safety improvements in the 2016 Tribal Transportation Safety Plan (TTSP), the 2016 Snake Road Roadway Safety Audit (RSA), and the Tribe's 2016 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Beyond enhancing safety, the Project will contribute to economic development by better accommodating the movement of goods and connectivity. The Project will translate to job growth and employment opportunities, as the road improvement will serve new development near Snake Road, including the newly constructed Little Trail Casino and expansion of the Little Trail Community. Page 181 of 184 These developments significantly increase traffic on Snake Road, underscoring the urgency to complete the improvements to the roadway. On September 24, 2022, the Miccosukee Tribal Transportation Improvement Program (TTIP) for Snake Road was approved by the Bureau of Indian Affairs Division of Transportation. This confirms the project's national significance, reflecting alignment with the goals established in the National Roadway Safety Strategy (NRSS) to prevent accidents, injuries, and roadway fatalities through a Safe System Approach. The Project has undergone rigorous review in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Therefore, this project is ready to begin as soon as funding becomes available, ensuring an immediate positive impact. The Snake Road Improvement Project exemplifies the type of initiative that the US Department of Transportation aims to support through the RAISE grant program. Grant funding is crucial to implement the improvements needed for the safe, equitable, and viable movement of goods and people along this corridor that is so important to the health and sustainability of the Tribe and all users of the facility. Thank you very much for considering this request. If you require any additional information or clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Anne McLaughlin Executive Director CC: MPO Board Page 182 of 184 2/14/2025 Item # 12.1) ID# 2025-537 Executive Summary Updated 2025 MPO Meeting Calendar OBJECTIVE: For the Board to receive a copy of the updated 2025 MPO Meeting Calendar. CONSIDERATIONS: The updated calendar shows the cancellation of the January 2025 Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) meeting and replaces the regularly scheduled April 15th meeting with a newly planned joint meeting on April 22nd with the Lee MPO Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinating Committee (BPCC). The updated 2025 MPO Meeting Calendar is provided in Attachment 1. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The date and location for the joint bike/ped meeting was the preferred choice of the BPAC at their October, 2024 meeting. Lee MPO staff provided concurrence from the BPCC. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That Board members receive the updated 2025 MPO Meeting Calendar. PREPARED BY: Sean Kingston, AICP, PMP, Principal Planner ATTACHMENTS: Updated 2025 MPO Meeting Calendar Page 183 of 184 Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) - Monthly at 9:30 a.m. MPO Board Meetings are held on the second Friday of the month at the Board of County Commissioners Chambers, Admin. Bldq. F, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL, 34112, unless otherwise noted. Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) - Monthly at 9:30 a.m. TAC Meetings are held on the fourth Monday of the month at the County Transportation Management Services Bldg., South Conference Room, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL, 34104, unless otherwise noted. Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) - Monthly at 2:00 p.m. CAC Meetings are held on the fourth Monday of the month at the County Transportation Management Services Bldg., South Conference Room, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL, 34104, unless otherwise noted. Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) - Monthly at 9:00 a.m. BPAC Meetings are held on the third Tuesday of the month at the Collier County Government Center, Admin. Bldg. F, IT Training Room, 5th Floor, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, 34112, unless otherwise noted. Congestion Management Committee (CMC) - Bi-Monthly at 2:00 p.m. CIVIC Meetings are held on the third Wednesday of every other month at the Collier County Transportation Management Services Bldq., South Conference Room, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL, 34104, unless otherwise noted. Local Coordinating Board (LCB) for the Transportation Disadvantaged - Quarterly at 1:30 p.m. LCB Meetings are held quarterly on the first Wednesday of the corresponding month at the Collier County Government Center, Admin. Bldg. F, IT Training Room, 5th Floor, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, 34112, unless otherwise noted.